Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-07/13/1998PLANNING BOARD I~EMBI~I~q BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chmrman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCI-IIE LATHAM, JR. RICYIARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Present were: MINUTES July 15. 1998 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Richard G. Ward G. Ritchie Latham Kenneth Edwards William Cremers Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Melissa Spiro, Planner Robert G Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer Absent: Martha Jones, Secretary Mr. Orlowski: Good evening. I'd like to cai this meeting to order. Board to set Monday, August 10, IgC8 au 5:30 p.m. at Southold Town Hall, Main Rd., Southold, as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board meeting. Mr. Cremers: So moved Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Al those n favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carned. PUBLIC HEARINGS Site Plans: Mr. Orlowski: 5:30 p.m. - Nextel Communications - This proposed site plan is for a 77 square foot prefabricated equipment enclosure and to affix three (3) antennas to an existing monopole tower, in Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-108- Southold Town Planning Board 2 July '13, '1998 4-11.3. Any comments? Lawrence Re': Yes, first of all, I have the affidavit of posting and the affidavit of mailing and the green cards. I submit them to the Board. Appearing for the applicant, Lawrence Re' of law firm Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re' with offices at 32 Woodbury Rd. in Huntington. Mr. Chairman, I'll be brief. This application seeks site plan approval for Nextel to affix three antennas to the existing pole on Elijah's Lane in Mattituck. Just by way of background, Nextel is licensed by the FCC to construct and operate a specialized mobile radio system, or SMR, in Suffolk County. Nextel strives to provide reliable service throughout the licensed coverage area. At the present time in Cutchogue and Mattituck,, Nextel coverage is poor. These antennas would eliminate this coverage gap. The antennas themselves measure 2-I/2 inches in diameter and a little over 13 feet, plus a 2 foot bracket, so fifteen feet if you count the bracket. They would be affixed to the existing pole at the top of the pole, but facing down so they that they will not increase the height of the pole, as depicted on the plans. The enclosure measures 11 feet by 7 feet and would enclose related telecommunications equipment. This site would not require any water, would not generate any garbage, would be unmanned, would be monitored remotely on a continuous basis 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. It will operate at a very Iow power level. As the Board is probably aware, the Telecommunications Act of ~ 996 preempts local govemments from regulating the placement of wireless facilities on the basis of their effects on the environment, so long as the radio frequency emissions are within limits set by the FCC. And we've had our proposal studied by Bell Labs and 'm going to be submitting a report that shows that the emissions from this site would be less than 2/100 of 1% of the FCC standard, so we're quite a bit below the FCC standard. So, I think this is a good site from every standpoint, it will eliminate the service gap and at the same time we would be complying with the Town policy to try to co-locate wherever possible, thereby obviating the need to build a new tower (inaudible)in the Cutchogue-Mattituck area. I have Rob O'Connor who is the engineer with Dvirka & Bartilucci present. He could describe the layout of the site in a little more detail for you, if that's Southold Town Planning Board necessary. Rob, why don't you come up. address on the record. July 1;5, 1998 If you could state your name and Rob O'Connor: My name is Rob O'Connor. I represent Dvirka & Bartilucci, Consulting Engineers, 550 Cross Place Park Drive in Woodbury, New York. Mr. Re': And you're a licensed engineer? Mr. O'Connor: Yes, I am. Licensed in New York State. Mr. Re': And you're familiar with the proposed site? Mr. O'Connor: Yes, lam. Mr. Re': OK, could you describe and use the plans that are up on the board, describe the site layout? Mr. O'Connor: Sure. The site is an industrial site. The proposed equipment will be located in a small enclosure set back from the roadway. There's a barn or storage garage up near the road and in the rear there is an existing cellular communications building. Just to the rear of the property within the fenced in compound they will install a gravel pad and they will install this pre-fabricated shelter that will come with a little 7xli concrete pad and then the enclosure will just sit right on top of that. The cables will then run underground from this enclosure to the existing monopole and will run up inside the monopole. And services will be provided underground from the Main Rd. - it looks like LILCO pole...there's no number here, but the nearest pole right on the (inaudible). Mr. Re': If the Board has any other questions, that really concludes my presentation with respect to the site plan. Mr. Odowski: OK, are there any other comments on this site plan? Dorothy Conlon: Yes, I'm representing Rosalie Maston, my mother, and I'm representing my sister Karen Maston, and myself Dorothy Conlon. Now, he was talking about this pre-fabricated equipment. Is it going to be on the west side, behind our home, or is it going to be behind the barn? I need to know. Southold Town Planning Board 4 July 13, 1998 Mr. Re': OK, as shown on the plans it's west of the other cellular building, sort of to the southwest of the other cellular building. Ms. Conlon: Now also, are these antennas going to interfere with our TV, our radio, any of our electrical equipment? Mr. Re': No, as a matter of fact I have a radio frequency engineer also, Mr. Rathweiler, if you'd give your name and address and address that issue. John Rathweiler: My name is John Rathweiler, Nextel CommuniCations, I North Broadway, White Plains, NY 10601. The telecommunications equipment uses frequency (inaudible) by the FCC. Those frequencies will operate within our band but not interfere with other telecommunications devices. Ms. Conlon: I have another question. want our property value to go down. and she does not want it. How about the property value? I don't ActUally, my mother is a senior citizen Mr. Re': He's an engineer, but I think I can address that. This site is already established as a telecommunications site. What's proposed here is just simply a very small enclosure, 11x7, and three antennas that are 2-1/2 inches in diameter, so that the character of the neighborhood will remain the same, it will be very unobtrusive. Ms. Conlon: Where did you also say where this pre-fabricated equipment will be located? Mr. Re': If you'd like to come up and look, it's hard to describe... Ms. Conion: You'll have to show me her house, where everything is located. Mr. Re': This is just south of the pole. The pole is located here - here is the existing cellular building and the little new building will be right here, the little enclosure. Ms. Conlon: Where's our house? Mr. Re': I'm not sure - do you live on Elijah's, across the road from...oh north of that. This is where Main Rd. is right here. You live on the other side of the pole, I guess. This would be on the opposite side of the pole here. Ms. Conlon: Why did they pick that area, that particular area? Southold Town Planning Board 5 July '1:5, '1998 Mr. IRe': I can give you a short answer and if that's not satisfactory, I can give a longer one. When there's not good coverage in a particular area, the engineers, Mr. IRathweiler and his crew will go out and measure the reception in the surrounding area and determine where a site should be located that would eliminate that service gap. And the first thing that the engineers and the folks at Nextel will do is, in that area there if there is an existing pole tower or tall building, or water tower, they will see if that works, so that we don't have to build a new tower. Fortunately, in the Mattituck area there was an existing pole there that does meet the needs and so we right away decided that that would probably be the best route to go. Because if that didn't work we would have to build a new tower or pole in the (inaudible) area and we try not to do that. So, the first thing we do is look where the service gap is, they look to see where in that area antennas could be placed that would get rid of the service gap, and then they look to see if there are any existing structures. So that's how it was decided. We have a map that we had prepared that shows on the map where the other sites are and this site lies between...there's a site in IRiverhead, and then there's another one in Southold and there's nothing in between. And so this is right in between and will fill in the gap that exists between the IRiverhead site and the site in Southold. Ms Conlon: But still it's coming backto the property value. If my mother wants to sell, is she going to get the amount of money that she's going to ask for her property, or is this equipment back there going to... Mr. Re': I don't see that the building of an 11x7 shed in an area that's already been proved by a 100 foot tower and other Duildings would have any effect on property value whatsoever, because it's already been established and we're simply trying to go on that site so that we don't effect possibly the character of a different neighborhood or the same neig[~oorhood by building a new structure. Ms. Conlon: But that is a family neighborhood. It really shouldn't have been built in the beginning. Mr. Orlowski: OK, any other comments. Terry Matthews: My name is Terry Matthews. I live across the street. I was wondering if there was any documentation of the signal strength or what the power output would be for these new antennas? Mr. Rathweiler: The output power of the site will be 100 watts of radiated power which is well below the FCC specifications and other governing Southold Town Planning Board 6 July 15, 1998 bodies, and there is an expert witness who could testify to that fact. In comparison, many people have stereos in their house that operate at 100 watts, so I mean this is a Iow power transmitter. These frequencies were previously used...are licensed by the FCG for high power television - UHF TV, and they've been re-licensed to Nextel for much lower powered use. Mr. Re': Let me interject. Was that the nature of your question or were you concerned about surrounding sites. Because I have somebody from Bell Labs who could probably give you more details on the radio frequency emission as compared to the FCC standard. Mr. Matthews: Actually, I was concerned with both. Mr. Re': OK, well Ron why don't you come up and address that. Ronald Peterson: My name is Ronald Peterson and i'm employed by Bell Laboratories. I manage a group called The Wireless and Optical Technologies, Safety Department. Mr. Re': And Mr. Peterson, you've prepared the report that I submitted to the Board a little while ago that studied the radio frequency emissions of the proposed site? Mr. Peterson: Yes. Mr. Re': OK, if you could address that in a little more detail. Mr. Peterson: We were provided with the antenna type that was going to be installed - transmitter power. Plus the same parameters for the AT&T equipment that's now on the site. We use a computer model to calculate what the (inaudible) - could be anywhere from the base of the tower out as far as you could go so, that would include the surrounding neighborhood. The model that we use overestimates the actual signals. We made measurements on losses and we always find. that the actual values are lower than what we predict. But what we predict is [ess than two thirds of a percent of what the FCC guidelines are, which is also the same guidelines that are used by New York State Department of Health. (Inaudible) when we make measurements it's anywhere from three to ten times lower than that, so it's a small signal compared to other types of transmission facilities. Southold Town Planning Board 7 July 15, 1998 Mr. Matthews: Is that reviewed and measured frequently, constantly...? Mr. Peterson: it really doesn't have to...no it's not and the reason is because the antenna, it's pattern is fixed, The transmitter output power is monitored so as long as that's not changing then the signal strength is not going to change. And what we found in the past and when we do these reports, we assume that it operates at the maximum power that it could operate at. And what we find is that most of them operate at lower powers than that to keep from interfering with themselves. Mr. Matthews: At that power (inaudible), should there be any interference with radio, TV reception, that is, other than cable? Mr. Peterson: No there won't be. It's a band of frequencies set aside by the FCC that no one else operates in and the requirements on the equipment that keep from interfering with other people and adjacent bands such as cellular and higher frequencies - VCS, really precludes it from causing any interference. We talk to the FCC quite a bit on issues such as this and they have no verifiable instances of where any of these sites cause any interference with any kind of consumer products or medical device or anything of that sort. Mr. Matthews: is there a ground meter affixed to this? Mr. Peterson: No. You mean something that would monitor this? Mr. Matthews: Yes. Mr. Peterson: No. The level is small. If it were an AM broadcast station or perhaps an FM broadcast station that operates at 50,000 or 100,000 watts, that might be a concern, but this is such a small signal thaT... Mr. Re': If I could just interject also, Nextel and other carriers, but I know Nextel for certain, have sites right on hospital roofs. For instance, we had an application on Huntington Hospital last year and the antennas are up and transmitting and they don't interfere with any of the hospital equipment as well as any radio signals, television signals, heart monitoring devices or anything of that sor~. And Huntington Hospital has been pleased as a landlord with respect to our site there. Thank you. Mr. Matthews: Unrelated to the question of power and the (inaudible) it would present - the driveway, would that use the existing stone driveway? Would that be shared? Sou~hold Town Planning Board 8 July 15, 1998 Unknown: Yes. That's (inaudible). There's an existing third driveway that goes past the barn? Mr. Matthews: it's actually stone. Unknown: Or dirt and stone. That's how Nextel would access the site. Mr. Matthews: So the existing buildJng...I 'm not sure where this building going, it was unclear on the site...but it did not show it southwest on the information, at least it didn't appear to (inaudible). Mr. Re': This is the existing cellular telephone building. (Everyone talking). Mr. Matthews: The only concern that I would have, if not for the frequency and the output which although I haven't seen the actual documentation I go by the word of the people who are presenting, is this pre-fabricated building or whatever type of building it is, is it going to be more visible in the neighborhood than the existing building? This building appears it's going to be straight back at the end of the road and I too would have to share concerns of the property value in the area. Quite frankly, the tower went up the last time before I knew it was going up. It has been a good neighbor, it's quiet, but this building that's planned to be built apparently is going to be a little more obvious from the Main Rd. And I do have concerns about property value in the area. Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Matthews, is there any effect now to your television? Mr. Matthews: When it was first put in there was no cable, so there was a definite effect. Since I hooked up to cable, no. I would say to the radio station certainly AM stations out of New York City I've noticed that that was effected, but I don't anticipate that that would be any greater than what it is now. My feeling is that's the tower and not necessarily the output from the attachments to it. The concern that I would have now is this building looks like it would be rather apparent from Elijah's Lane. Mr. Orlowski: Ms, Maston does your mother have any effect from the... Ms. Maston: NO, not at the moment. I have another question. Is this for the truck drivers? Is it used for CB, that they want to transmit, talk to each other or get in touch with someone in another state or...? Mr. Re': It's not CB but there are commercial users who use Nextel as well as individuals so there are all different types of users. Some may be driving Soutl~old Town Planning Board 9 July 15, 1998 trucks and vans and cabs and things like that but it's not a CB... Mr. Orlowski: How tall is that building? Mr. Re': The building, I believe is eight feet tail...is that right? Approximately eight feet. Mr. Kassner: Mr. Re' can I ask what color the enclosure Mr. Re': I think it's going to be set up to match the existing ...brown agreate, I'm told, with a stone finish. Mr. Kassner: Just for the record, it looks like the equipment structure is about 300 feet back from Elijah's Lane. Mr. Re': I believe that's right, about 300 feet. Mr. Orlowski: You wouldn't have any problem buffering that with plantings? Mr. Re': No, we could put some landscaping around it. Yes. Mr. Orlowski: Are there any other questions or comments on this? Hearing none, are there any questions from the Board? Mr. Ward? Any questions from the Board? Mr. Ward? Mr. Ward: No. Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Latham? Mr. Latham: Only about this interference. If there is any interference, what recourse do the people have? Who do they go to to correct the interference if it ever happens? Mr. Peterson: If there is interference it's up to the service provider to remedy it, but I can assure you it's not. It just operates at a completely different part of the spectrum and other communications: But the service provider is responsible for insuring that it doesn't happen. Mr. Latham: So if there is a problem, the people around it would have some recourse. Mr. Peterson: Yes. July '15, '1998 Southold Town Planning Board 10 Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Cremers? Mr. Cremers: No. Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Edwards? Mr. Edwards: No. Mr. Odowski: Ms. Scopaz? Ms. Scopaz: My only question is whether it would be possible to just shift the building over a few feet so that it's out of direct line of site. Mr. Odowskh They're willing to landscape it though, and hide it so...OK, I'll entertain a motion to close the hearing. Mr. Ward: So moved. Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to offer the following resolution regarding the State Environmental Quality Review Act. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as Lead Agency, and as Lead Agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Mr. Odowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. CremerS. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Southold Town Planning Board 11 July 15, 1998 Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to also make a further resolution, WHEREAS, William J. Baxter and Jane P. Ooeller are the owners of the property known and designated as SCTM# 1000-108-4-11.3 located at Etijah's Lane, Mattituck; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on April 28, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on July 13, 1998; and WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by Ed Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement, on July 13, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals in a letter to the applicant dated May 28, 1998 determined that a Special Exception was not required for this project; and WHEREAS, applicant has agreed to screen equipment cabinet from view down driveway from Elijah's Lane and from neighbors adjacent to property with 6 foot evergreens; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the Surveys dated June 11, 1998, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject t° a one year review from date of building permit. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Just on that motion, we ask for the landscaping. We'd like to see a landscaping plan. Mr. Re': Would that be completely surrounding the building or for facing Elijah's Lane? Mr. Orlowski: Well it appears...we'd like to cut it off from the neighbors and the people around it so they can't see it, so some tall arborvitae would probably make it look a whole lot better. But we would like to see that ona plan. So then maybe the neighbors will come in and take a look. Southold Town Planning Board 12 Jui¥ 1:5, 1998 Mr. Re': Yes, we could do that. Mr. Odowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Odowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Hearings Held Over From Previous Meetings: Mr. Orlowski: Jimbo Realty Corp. - This proposed site plan is for a 54,200 square foot self service dry storage building; a 1,750 square foot residence, and a 1,575 square foot office building on a 2.9 acre site on Rt. 48 (a.k.a. North Rd., Middle Rd.) in Southold. SCTM# I000-59-4-8 & 9. At this time I'll entertain a resolution to hold the hearing open, pending receipt of revised site .plans from the applicant. The hearing is open. I think we've heard all the comments. I don't know if anybody else has anything new, otherwise we're just going to hold this hearing open until the next meeting. Mr. Latham: So moved. Mr. Ward: Second. Mr. Odowski: Any questions? All those in favor? Bernard Heinisch: I have a question. My name is Bernard Heinisch, I live on County Rt. 48. How long do you hold these meetings oPen if the recipient does not comply? Mr. Orlowsld: Well, he's called and said he would so we're giving him the benefit of the doubt until the next meeting. We'll decide after that. Mr. Heinisch: Thank you. Mr. OrloWski: All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Donna Dzugas Smith: When it's held open too...like weattended the last Southold Town Planning Board July 13, 1998 Architectural Review Committee that was held about this.. :because it seems like you have public hearings and you have work sessions and (inaudible) so I'm trying to follow this. But things that were brought up at the Architectural Review Committee gets (inaudible) over to Jimbo and that gets all considered, then is that open to public comment again? Because there were things that were changed at the last Architectural Review... Mr. Orlowski: Did you get the last report? Ms. Dzugas Smith: No we didn't. There was (inaudible) talk and then we were told that we can't ask questions and so it makes it hard when you can't communicate at meetings, so we're kind of waiting for our point to make comments about what was said and decided at that meeting. So when is that appropriate to bring that up? Mr. Orlowski: Well, there is a report from the Architectural Review which this Board is in favor of, and it's available and you can take a look at it. (CHANGE TAPE). That's the one the Board is asking the applicant to amend his site plan and respond to it and we're waiting for that site plan. Ms. Dzugas Smith: So at the next public hearing we could... Mr. Kassner: Could I make a comment. I just might inform you that next Monday, which is the 20th, at the work session at 4:30 Mr. Gray is coming in and we're going to review this with him and the Architectural Review Board. Ms. Dzugas Smith: That's good to know. Thank you. Mr. Orlowski: I didn't even know that. MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES AND SET OFF APPLICATIONS Final Determinations Mr. Orlowski: Corso-Steele-Modlin - This application which is for 4 lot line changes is to subtract 51,020 square feet from a 17.94 acre parcel and to add 1,188 square feet to existing Lot 1, 17,554 square feet to existing Lot 2, 13,802 square feet to existing Lot 3, 18,476 square feet to existing Lot 4, and to relocate an existing 50 foot right of way to run along the southeasterly line of the revised parcels SCTM# 1000-83-2-10.2, I0.3, 10.4, July I$, 1998 Southold Town Planning Board 14 10.5 & 10.6. Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman I'll offer the following resolution. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Ghairman to endorse the final surveys dated August 20, 1997. Conditional final approval was granted on October 6, 1997. All conditions have been fulfilled. Mr. Ward: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Setting of Final Hearings: Mr. Orlowski: Ore,qon LLC - Corso - This proposed lot line change consists of 3 applications which are being reviewed concurrently. The 3 original parcels are 17,4 acres, 4.7 acres and 2.1 acres in area. The 3 revised parcels will be 16.1 acres, 4.7 acres and 3.4 acres in area upon completion of the lot line applications. SCTM# 1000-83-2-11.3 & 11.4 and 83-2-I0.6. Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to offer tl~e following resolution regarding the State Environmental Quality Review Act. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, do an uncoordinated review of this unlisted action. The Planning Board establishes itself as Lead Agency, and as Lead Agency makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Southold Town Planning Board 15 July 15, 1998 Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Odowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Ward: And further, BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, August '10, '1998 at 5:30 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated June '15, '1998. Mr. Cremers: Second that motion. Mr. Odowskk Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Odowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. SITE PLANS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Determinations: Mr. Odowski: Bell Atlantic - This proposed site plan is to erect a 99 foot telecommunication tower for cellular antennas and an associated 12 foot by 40 foot unmanned equipment shelter, in Mattituck. SCTM# '1000-'14'1-3-34. What's the Board's pleasure? Mr. Ward: Mr Chairman, i'd tike to offer the following resolution. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as Lead Agency, and as Lead Agency makes a determination of significance, and grants a Positive Declaration. Mr. Latham: Second, Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? Atl those in favor? Ayes: Mr, Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards. Mr. OdowSki: Opposed? Motion carried. Southold Town Planning Board 16 Ju1¥1~,1998 Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I abstain. Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Cremers abstained. Mr. Orlowskh ~ - This application is to amend an approved site plan for construction of 118 single family detached cottages; '132 apartment units; 24 unit assisted living center; and 32 bed skilled care center with supPorting amenities. SCTM# 1000-35-I-25. I'm going to take that off from a resolution because there are things that we just got late this afternoon that the BOard has not reviewed it. There are some questions on here. I know you're all here for that, but you can hang around when we go into our work session, we'd appreciate it because we'd like to review some of these with you. So we're going to put that on hold for right now. APPROVAL OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Mr. Orlowskh Board to approve the June 15, 1998 minutes. Mr. Ward: So moved. Mr. Cremers: Second. Mr. Odowskh Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? AyeS: Mr. Odowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr, Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. I have nothing left on my agenda. Is there anyone here that would like to talk on the agenda on anything? If not, I'll entertain a motion to adjourn. Mr. Edwards: So moved. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Odowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Southold Town Planning Board 17 July '13, 1998 There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Bennett Orlo'~¢~ki: Jr,, Martha A. Jones Secretary RECEIVED AND FILED BY ~ sou~o~ ~o~ c~ To'~n Clezk, Town of Southold~