Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-142.-1-27
'TOWN~ SOUTHOLD PLAN~ 3ARD ~ 5 SITE PLAN APPLICATION . SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Site Plan Name: ~4~ ~T(~eO~V~t~~t ~ SuffoikCoua~Taxaapgl000-/~2- 0] - ~7 trier ~ll~ ~s'. ~0~ ~ Street Address: ~ ~1~ ~OA~ Hamlet: ~ ~l~ Dist~ce to nearest intersection: 0 ' - O" Type of Site Plan: ~ New __~ended Residential If Amended, last approval date: / · SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and phone number for the people below: Telephone ~ ~ 5'.'- ~'(o I--~0000ther Zip { Z,~ I Applicant Street City ~5:1~¢O~ 6 t4~ State l~a~-Telephone ~qg' "~to{ --l-tk000 Other pphcant s Agent or R~el/rqsentahve: , t __" , V ~l~,t~ ~<:~.~ Ul~ Contact Person(s) ~0 ~ E ~9 g~7 I City ~7 ~a~y~ ~ State Zip t t 70 ~- OfficeTelephone (0 :~1--~ Zl- 7777 Other ~:]~I"- b6 [-Oc~°~ *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. ~/l~'l~ ~'0q -4':?-~0 Page 1 of 2 10/05/05 ~S,~TION C: Site Data Proposed construction type: __ Property total acreage or square footage: X Modification of Existing"Srtructure Change of use Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: ~.l b ~' ~.(~'"~ ! Agricultural Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes __ If yes, explain: No ~( Property Zoning District(s): ~:~- (~/k~(~(...~ Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: /2- /~-~ / ~ Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes __ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. No Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: List all proposed property uses: Other accessory uses: tt rOAt, Existing lot coverage: 8 % Proposed lot coverage: / ~ % Gross floor area of existing structure(s): [C[~O sq. t~. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): 3 ] ~a° Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: # of proposed spaces: '2_. Loading Berth: Yes No ~ Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: ~.O % Proposed landscape coverage: //, 5" % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes No ~ Ifyesexplain: I, the undersigned, certify that all the above information is true. Signature of Preparer: ~ Date: Page 2 of 2 10/05/O5 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: December 27, 2005 REVISED: December 28, 2005 RENEWED: April 26, 2006 AMENDED: August 2, 2006 RENEWED & AMENDED: July 17, 2007 AMENDED: August 2, 2007 AMENDED: August 21, 2007 ~ AMENDED: September 21, 2007 TO: Warex Terminal Corp. 9945 Route 25 Mattituck, NY 11952 Please take notice that your application dated December 7, 2005 For permit to add a car wash bay for a car wash use and make additions and alterations to an existing gas station and convenience store use at Location of property: 9945 Route 25, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 142 Blockl Lot 2~7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this 24,829 square foot parcel in the B District, is not permitted pursuant to Article X Section 100-102, which states; "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet, following the proposed construction, the building will have a side yard setback of+/- 15 feet. In addition, the extension of the existing canopy is not permitted pursuant to Article III, Section 100 242, A., which states; "Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling, reconstruction or enlargement of a nonconforming building containing a conforming use, provided that such action does not create any new nonconformance or increase the degree of nonconformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings. On January 4, 1995, the applicant was issued a variance (g4290) to construct a canopy with an insufficient front yard setback of 11.5 feet. Following the proposed construction, the size of the canopy will be increased and is noted having an 8.33-foot front yard setback (from SR 25}. Also, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-103, C., which states; "A project shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than 60 linear feet of frontage on one street." Followin~ the proposed construction, the building will have +/-67.08 feet of frontage on Factory Avenue (canopy). In addition, the proposed car wash use requires special exception approval ~om the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Both proposed uses require site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. This Notice of Disapproval was amended on August 2~ 2006~ following the submission of a new site plan showing additional proposed work and on July 17~ 2007~ following changes to the proposed p.roiect.~nd~on September 21~ 2007~ to make changes to the disapproval regarding the need for~ ~ sqpm~-~tage varian~ Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A., PLANNING TO: Warex Terminal Corp. 9945 Route 25 Mattituck, NY 11952 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: December 27, 2005 REVISED: December 28, 2005 RENEWED: April 26, 2006 AMENDED: August 2, 2006 RENEWED & AMENDED: July 17, 2007 AMENDED: August 2, 2007 Please take notice that your application dated December 7, 2005 For permit to add a car wash bay for a car wash use and make additions and alterations to an existing gas station and convenience store use at Location of property: 9945 Route 25, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 142 Blockl Lot 27 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this 24,829 square foot parcel in the B District, is not permitted pursuant to Article X Section 100-102, which states; "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet, following the proposed construction, the building will have a side yard setback of+/- 15 feet. In addition, the extension of the existing canopy is not permitted pursuant to Article IH, Section 100- 242, A., which states; "Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling, reconstruction or enlargement of a nonconforming building containing a conforming use, provided that such action does not create any new nonconformance or increase the degree of nonconformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings. On January 4, 1995, the applicant was issued a variance (#4290) to construct a canopy with an insufficient front yard setback of 11.5 feet. Following the proposed construction, the size of the canopy will be increased and is noted having a 13.33-foot front yard setback. Also, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-103, C., which statesl "A proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than 60 linear feet of frontage on one street." Following the proposed construction, the building will have +/-120 feet of frontage on Factory Avenue and +/- 70 feet of frontage on Main Road. In addition, the proposed car wash use requires special exception approval fi.om the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Both proposed uses require site plan approval fi.om the Southold Town Planning Board. This Notice of Disapproval was amended on August 2, 2006~ following the submission of a new site plan showing additional proposed work and on July 17~ 2007~ following changes to the orooosed oroiect. Authorized Si~a---~Sii~ Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A., PLANNING 617.20 Appendix State Environmental ~ FULL ENVIRONMENTAL A Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies dst; be significant. The question of vvhethar an action may be significant a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It ia also understood thal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in en~ in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affec The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby appticar has been ordedy, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to silo Full EAF Componenta: The full F_~F is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a give a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impect; aa to whether an impact is likely to be considered art form also identifies whether an impact can be mltiga Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified aa potentially-lar; actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEADA DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Identify the Portions of FAF completed for this project: I I Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 a~ cone daring both the magn rude and importance of each impact, it is ~ DA. The project will not any large import; in significant impact on the environment, therefore · ~ DB. Although the project could have a significant effeo for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation me a CONDITIONED negative deela~atlon will be prep~ The project may result in one or more large and im environment, therefore a positive declaration will *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlis Name of A( Name of Lead Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency · webeito A lualltF Review 3SESSMENT FORM rmlne, in an ordedy manner, whether a project or action may r not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of those who determine significance may have little or no formal ironmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge lng the question of significance. ts and agencies can be assured that the determination process ,/introduction of information to fit a project or action. project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists and 3. that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance ~11 to moderate or whether it Is a potentially-large impact. The :ed or reduced. e, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is 3ENCY USE ONLY -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Part1 DPart 2 DPart 3 ~d 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and 3asenably determined by the lead agency that: nt impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a ~egatlve declaration wgl be prepared. on the enviror~nent, there will not be a significant effect ,sures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore torrent impacts that may have a significant impact on the prepared. d Actions tion ~,gency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of R'eparer (If different from refl3onslble officer) Date Page 1 ot 21 PART 1--PROJECT IN; Prepared by Projecl NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether th, environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answ application for approval and may be subject to further verification and pub will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on inform; research or Investigation. If information requiring s~ch additional work I.~ Location of Action (include StTeet Address, Municipality and County) Name of Applicant/Sponsor D~(~ Name of ~.er (if dlforent) ~R~ Address ~ O. ~ ~ Description of Action: ORMATIC~ Sponsor r~!be cons dored., part of C"4 II ~ tion cu~enay ~vaih hie a ......... ~nv~ve n~ _._ unavailable, ~ inc cate and spe~'~ach ~ance. ZipCode 1 Page 2 of 21 ~ ./ Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if no1 A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped ar 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial ~r~ommerci O Forest D Agriculture •Other 2. Total acreage of Project area: O.¢~ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) ., Wate~ Surface Area / ./f_ Unvegetated (Rock, eaith or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (indicate type) What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: '~Well drained [~'~ % of site ~Poorly drained __% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [] Yes J~ a. What is depth to bedrock ~' I-I~O (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: % . Is project substantialhLgontiguous to, or contain a building, site, 6. Historic Places? []Yos ~ No 7. is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register 8. What is the depth of the water table? ~'G (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole sourqe aquifer? 10. Do hunting, fishing or shetl fishing opportunities presently exist ir applicable D Residential (suburban) D Rural (non-farm) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION _(~./.-_-_-~,~, acres O, 5 [ acres O. acres Oe. acroa 1Moderately well drained % of site. classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land No greater district, listed on the State or National Registers of :National Natural Landmarks? [] Yea []No [] No the project area? [] Yes ~No Page 3 of 1 I. Does project'site contain any species of plant or animal life that According to: j dentlf each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site7 {i DYes "~No Describe: 13. Is the projeCt site presently used If yes, explain: I ~ 4. Does tho prosont aito / by ti~e community or neighborhc a views known to be im identified as threatened or endangered? e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ad as an open space or recreation area? to the community? Dyes 1 5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 1 6. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area b. Size {in acres): I Page 4 off 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to altow connection? b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to A 18. 304? E]Yes '~No 19. IS the site located in or substantia_lly c)~tiguous to a Critical Envir and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~"]Yes ~o [] No []Yes 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project {fill in dimensions as apl a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project spo b. Project acreage to be developed: (~. ~' acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: (~) ,~'-'~'~ acres. d. Length of project, in mi~es: ~ ! ~ {if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion of off-street parking spaces existing ~_____~: prol f. Number g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: ~, ~:3 (up( h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: Initially Ultimately ~ i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will ( 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes a. if yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? I Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes b. c, Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will DNo DYes ~'~o riculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and nmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, wastes7 r~Yes ropriate). ~,~,~' acres ultimately. ? ropos . 5(0 ,d ompletion of projeot)? Multiple Family Condominium height: [LI;~ width: ~.length. ccupyis?~~. =rom the site? ~ tons/~ DN/A (es .~No be removed from site? O,O~ acres. Page 5 of ~.1 ~ 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other Iocally-imporl If singla phaee proioct: Anticipatsd period of construction: 7. ~[ multi-phased: a. lotel numbar o~ phaaes anticipsted __ {number} b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? []Yes ~ No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction (~ ; after 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Ye If yea, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal Involved? __ Yes o a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industdal, stc) and err b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged liquid waste disposal involved? DYes [] 3. Is 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease b If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood pla 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes [] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? ~_, tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [~ Yes ant vegetation be removed by this project? "nonths, (including demolition) year, (including demolition) __ year. iect is complet,e ~ No No Type~ proposal? [] Yes ~No '-1No Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into Page 6 of .>1 a sanitary landfill? DYes ~[~No e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons b, If yes, what s the anticipated sit_e life? __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes ~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day] 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient 21.-~WiJl project result in an increase in energy use? [~Yes [] If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~ 23. Total anticipated water usage per day~ gallons/day. 24, Does project involve Local State or Federal funding? [] Yes'~ If yes, explain: month. D Yes"~No 3ise levels? DYes~No sllons/minute. / No Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board ]Yes '~No City, Town, Village Planning Beard ~Yes [] No City, Town Zoning Board RYesN No City, County Health Department ~Yes [] No Other Local Agencies [] Yes ~No Other Regional AGencies DYes l~No State Agencies DYes ~o Federal Agencies []Yes '~No Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision7~ If Yes, indicate decision required: [] Zoning amendment 'l~Zoning variance ~Site plan ,: ASpe6ia, use permit Page 8 of Type fas [] No r"J New/revision of master plan ]Resource management plan Submittal Date · [] Subdivision D 0ther 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if devel( )d as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? §. What is the maximum potential development of the site if devel( 3d as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6, Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in dopted local land use plans? ~jYes I 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of lend, how many lots a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? / ithin a ~ mile radiums o~/propoeed action~ uses with a ~ mile? es proposed, DNo ,i Page 9 of; ~ 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation 1 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community prov a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected dema 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significa~ a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the adc D. In~ormetionel ~etsile )' / Attaoh any adriifionsl information ss may bs~e~:led to clarify your associated with your proposal, please discuss ~uch impacts and the rm E. Verification of sewer or water districts? [] ~es~_ No dad services (recreation, education, policef fire protection? ~d? [] Yes ~ No ~tly above present levels? itional traffic. []Yes D Ye~ No ~No project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts asures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of r ~y knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Signature If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete th assessment. Coastal Assessment Form before proceedrn~ with this Page 10 of 2 ~ Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: 07/24/06 * * * RECEIPT * * * Receipt~: 2566 Transaction(s): 1 1 Application Fees Reference Subtotal 142-1-2 $828.00 Check~:2566 Total Paid: $828.00 Name: Clerk ID: Warex, Mattituck S P 1050 Udall Road Corp 1050 Udall Rd Bay Shore, NY 11706 LINDAC Internal ID: 142-1-27 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone:'~31 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk From: Planning Department Date: July 24, 2006 Re: Checks Enclosed herewith is/are the check(s) listed below. Please return a receipt to us., Thank you. Project Name & Type Werex Mattituck SP TaxMap# / Amount / Date of Check 142-1-27 [ $828.00app. 5/10/06 LR eric. RECEIVED JUL 2 rl 2005 SITE PLAN. A~PLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: / / Site Plan Name: Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- Other SCTM #s: ~t~/0tt t~. Street Address: q ~ t4 ~ Distance to nearest intersection: Type of Site Plan: ltd~l/A~ flOA~ Hamlet: 0'~ 0~t X New __Amended If Amended, last approval date: / / Residential SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please li~t name, mailing address, and phone number for the people below: Telephone ,~ t~.,,c... ~'(o (~-"~O000ther Street City. ~tI~OR 6 t4~ State ~q? ~elephone ~>htg' ''~'/o¢ -t4000 Other Applicant's Agent or R~grq, sentafive: . · - ..... g~ ContactPerson(s)* l~Olq c-~I~'Vi'| stx t 6 4-0 'ot, iate :q uwt City ~- ~ff]g~l,'~t~l State ~ Zip ltTO~' *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 1 of 2 SFCTION C: Site Data Proposed construction type: __New Property total acreage or square footage: Modification of Existing Structure Change of use Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: ~.16 ~> ~-~ / Agricultural Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes __ If yes, explain: No ~< Property Zoning District(s): ~>- ~~/~J{~lO''~(~ Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: /2-- /~¢~ / O~ Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals~.required? Yes __ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes ~ No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. No Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: List all proposed property uses: Other accessory USes: Existing lot coverage: 8 % Proposed lot coverage: I ~ % ~ross floor area ofcxi~i,g s~ct~e(s): lCtgo sq. n. ~ross noor area ofp~oposed str,ctur~(s): 3 1 6,P Parking Space Data: # of existing spaces: # of proposed spaces: Loading Berth: Yes__ No ~' Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: ~,0 % Proposed landscape coverage: Waterfront Data: ,, Is this property within 500 of a wetland area? Yes No ~ Ifyesexplain:, I, the undersigned, certify that all the above information is true. SignatureofPreparer: ~~' Date: <J' - Page 2 of 2 10/05/05 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agenci ~hall c~pl~.~?,~..,~CAF fo~: proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfi-~~ assessment is intended to supplement other information used b: ~~g~l; .~ making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt rn '~in~Ba~ilitihg Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfxont Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- suooortino facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# /~/2 - ~/t_ 2 7 PROJECT NAME OA/'~. tdAo°~. COg' The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board [-~ Planning Board [-~ Building Dept. ~ Board of Trustees Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital ~-~ construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) ~-~ (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Cogv l- g'gRv'/e Siteacreage: o ,tC. tqL , 140 Present land use: ~ qg ~1~ Present zo~ng cl~sificafion: ~- ~~ ~ If ~ application for the proposed action h~ been filed wi~ ~e Town of Sou~old agency, ~e following info~ation sh~l be provided: (a) N~eofapplic~t: ~ ~[~ ¢) Mhlingad&ess: ~. ~, ~OX CW, t 2 50 (0 Tel~hone nmb~: ~ea Code ~0 ~ ~ - Z ~ ~ (d) Application nmb~, iffy: Will ~e action be ~ectly ~d~ req~re ~dhg, or approval by a state or fed~al agmcy? Yes ~ No ~ If yes, whch state or f~al agency?_ C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattera of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes ~ No ~-~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ~ Yes ~ NO ~ NOt Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria [] Yes ~-~ No ~ Not Applicable' Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ~-~ Yes ~-~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ~-~ Yes ~-~ No ~ ]Not Applicable Attach additional sheets ifnecessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes ~ No ~[ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary i Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Yes [~ No ~, Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Yes ~ No ~ Not Applicable Attsch additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold'~ate.r-dependen!. uses and promote suitable locations. See LWRl~ctmn III - Pohcies; Pages 47 throu~]l~6 [] Yes [--] No ~, Not Applicable of new water-dependent uses in for evaluation criteria. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ~-~ Yes V-~ No [~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [~ No ~ Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes [--] No ~ Not Applicable PREPARED BY ~ Amended on 8/1/05 TITLE ~X~~DATE ~CA~ION FOR SPE~ EX~ON A~l~ti~ No. Date cby ~ly to the ZON~G BO~D OF APP~L5, Sou~ol~ New Y~k I~r a S~EC~L ~ION in acco~cc ~ ~hc ZON~ ~IN~, AR~C~ .~. , SE~[ON NO~; ~a~li~ is not ~ o~, s~ i{appl{~t is o~t a~ol~', at,hi, ~t~¢l, buil~r, the bel~--des~ pro~' f~ ~ follo~ng ~s ~d ~s~ (md ~ sbo~m on te a~ehed p~ ~ ~ scale): (a~cb s~a~c shc=~ ffuccdcd) Statement of Owners½it~ and Interest: (Ho~No. S~ Ha~eO id~fifi~ ~ t~ Su~o~ Coun~ Tax Msp* ~ Dis~ct 10~, Scc~on /~ ~ ~ ~ a~ved by ~ So~old Tow, P=~g Board on as a ~e ~ ~ orai~-~ee ~ would not be de~i~l to pr~C~ or p~ ~ ~e ~bo~ood for ~e follo~g m~: ~ ~ w~ is ~e ~bj~ of ~ appiiaafioa is ~ned ~d is ~t cons~t ~ the C~ca~ of Ooc~cy ~ f~shod h~ for ~ [ ] is vaca~lt land STATE OF NEW YORK) Swomtobefote~mls ~- dayof ~1~ / .200~' Nota~ ~blic, State of New York No. 01BU00~82~8 TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK: · (Residence, House No. and Str O~amlet, State, Zip Code, Telephone Number} hereby apply to THE ZONI. NG BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in acmordance the ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE /t. , SECTION lo Z~ , SUBSECTION for the below-described property for the following uses and purposes (and.as shown the attached plan drawn to scale): ~) j.~ ~,/J~2~ $(~'/~£~ ~ ~ ~F r~q~_ A. Statement of Ownership and Interest~ . ~/~'~fic '-T-~/~/~L ~_~/~ is(j~) the owner(~)!o property known and referred to as ~ ~_~J~-7~-~~ ~'~n~r/'~ ~ ,. (House No., Street, Hamlet) identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District lO00, section'£~, Block Lot(lr~ ~_?- , which is not (is) on a subdivision Map (Piled' "Map of' "Filed Map No. and has been approved by the Southold Town Planning Board on as a [Minor] [Major] Subdivision). : The above-described property was acquired by the owner on ~ ' . . , B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony: the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms the standards prescribed therefor in said ordinance and would not be detrimental property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: C. The property which is, the subject of this application is zoned ~) . [~] i~ .cmn)i~%¢nt with the.use(s) described in the Certificate of Occupancy beiK furnis~led herewith. [ ] is noticonsistent with the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewit? for th? following reason(s): ~-~ x- [ ] is vac~nt land. ~~ i/~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEWiYORKi ss.: / Y / QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION Is the subject premises listed on the rea[estate market for sale? fi] Yes ~I~No Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? [] Yes ~No 1) Are there any areas that contain wetland grasses? ~,c. 2) Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with this application? ~ 3) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? 4) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of thq Town Trustees for its determination ofjurisdict/on? Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or belOw feet above mean sea level? ~ (If not applicable, state "n/a".) ~ Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? b~'~ (If none exist, please Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? t~' ffyes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department. If none, please state. G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? If yes, please eipl, where or submit copies of deeds. : H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel CZ~.f ~-;r~-'r ~ ~ .4 C3, ~ i~ and Date ' PROJECT DESCI~ON (Please include with Z.B+ Application) B. Please give the d/mensions and square footage of'm ext~d be, fond the ex/sting build/rig: Dimeasiol~/size: Square footage:. ~llS al~ DrOOO~: ~e of~t~sions b~vond exisfino building: w proposed foundat/on ar~s wh/ch do not · Ifa sign'is proposed, plea.sc: A. Criv~ dinamsions of existing sign wkh photograph c r skotch with details. B. Give dimensicr, s of new sign. C. Is tho now sign replacing an cxisting sign? Yes__ No~ Ifso, ploaseoxplain: Squam foota~: i Height: ] HI. Propose and usc of new construction requested in this a IV. A~4~/onal information about the surrounding contoun in meeting the code requir~tmt(s): )r nearby buildin? th~ r~l~'e to the difl%ulty V. Please submit seven (7) photos/sets after ~ cornel S of the proposed new constntction. 7/02 61Z21 Sta~ Environ~ntal S~O~ ~.3~O~ ~ For UNL IS ~ ACt ~ON~ 0~l~ ;~omor) tName · 5. Is proposed action: ( ) NEW' ~ EXPANSION ( ) MODIFICATION/ALTERATION 6. Describe projec~ briery: 7, ~nount of land affectad: Ir~ally: acres; U~mately:. I ~-% t ¢.~,~,~. ~..r . -.r-~ ~'~c~ ~ ¢ t 4. 8, Will proposed ac~on comp~ vath e,~s~ng or o~he~ e,,~Js~ng land use reaCh'dons: 9. What is pre~ent land use in vicinity of project: (describe): ( )Residential ( )Industrial (~_.ommercia/ ( )Agricultural ( )P 10. Does action involve a permit approval or funding, now or ultimately from any ot~ If Ye~, list agency(s) and permit/approvals: ( )YES ~O 11. Does any aspect of ~e ac~on have a currency valid permit or approval? If Ye~. list agency(s) and permit/approvals: ( )YES 12. As a result of proposed action, will e:dsting pemllt/approval require modification? Ii' )¥~s p,mo If Ye~, list agency(s) and permit/approvals: I cefttty tllat ii. Imagination provided alcove ~at~to the ~ of my /(/.. ,, ,, I /' · ~ ,fl- ,/ I / ~stal Assessment Form before proceeding with this as~ ) YES ( ) NO If NO, describe briefly:. id~JForest/Open Space ( ) Other r Governmental agencT,(Fedeml, Slate er Local) ? IApplicant / Sponsor .,N~me: Signature: the at,fan I$ in the Coastal Area, and you are a siam agency, complete the APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers ~ ea~nployees, The p~trpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the ToTM of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Cheek all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other If"Other", Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" inehid~ by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, includi/~g a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO ~ If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. . Name of person employe4 by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the apace provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check albthat apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when'the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: December 27, 2005 REVISED: December 28, 2005 TO: Warex Terminal Corp. 9945 Route 25 Mattimck, NY 11952 Please take notice that your application dated December 7, 2005 For permit to add a convenience store use and a car wash bay for a car wash use in an existing gas .s. tation at Location of property: .9.945 Route 25, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section !42 Block_l Lot 2__~7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this 24,829 square foot parcel in the B District, is not permitte~l pursuant to Article X Section 100-102, which states; "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking, and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same fome and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side ward setback of 25 feet, following the proposed construction, the building will have a side yard setback of+/- 2 feet In addition, the proposed car wash use requires special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appenls. Both proposed uses require site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the abol~e referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. WAREX TERMINALS CORPORATION P.O. BOx 488, Newburgh, N.Y. 12551 (e4s) SS~-4000 Octobor 31, 2005 DSC Construction 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Town of Southold Southold, NY 11971 Re: Citgo Service Station Main Road & Factory Avmue Mattituck, NY To Whom It May Concern, I (und~a~isned), hereby give DSC Construction and George Abizeid p~it&seion to apply for and receive all permits necessary to upgrade the above mmtioncd service station to conslmct a convenienc~ store and cmwash. Vice President APPLICATION TO TIlE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS -- Fiied By: For Office Use Only Date Assigned/Assignraent No. Parcel Location: House No.~-~Street SCTM 1000 Section ]42. Block · (~/q-I~d /~0/~'.-~ Hamlet !v?,q-'7'Tt'70~C~_~ Lot(s) t~1: Lot Size ~ Zone District I (WE) APPEAL TIlE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR Address: Telephone: NOTE: [f applicant is ~lot the ~wner, state if applicant is owner's attorney, agent, architect~ builder, contract vendee, etc. Authorized Representative: Plea~specify who you wish correspondence t~ be mailed to, from the above listed nnm~s: ~Applican~Owner(s) ~ Authorized Representative ~ Other: FOR: ~ufi~ng Permit ~ Certificate of Occupancy 0 Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ~ Change of Use ~ Permit for As-Built Cons~uetion Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article ,~. Section 100- (v2~ Subsection Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: ~'A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. [3 A 'Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. 13 Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section [] Reversal or Other A prior appeal [] has~h~s not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No, Yesr Page 2 of 3 - Appeal Application Part A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS Caffach extra sheet as needed): (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neJghbo.rhood or a detriment to nearby prope~Jes, if .grant. ed, b~c?s_e: "~ ,~/~d£.c (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method.feasible for th. applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: ~ (3) The amount'of relief requested is not substantial because: (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmentc conditions in the neighborhood or district because: ~¢~ ~R~4.¢_..,¢c f.~' (5} Has fl~e variance been self-created? (~) Yes, or ( ) No. If not, Is the constructio existing, as built?. ( ) Yes, or ( ) No. (6) Additional information about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate fo the dllflculty In meeting~fhe code requirements: (attach extra sheet as needed) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and' at the same time pre--erves an protects the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of th community. ( ) Check this box and complete PART B, Questions on neXt page fo apply USE VARIAN¢ ~blfol~se consult your attorney.) .C)the~w,J~,, please proceed fo f.~l~ si.clnature an nota a ea below. ~--~e of ~'~pellant or Auth.orized Agent _Swom to before me th. is /(Agent must submit Authorization from Owner) (Notary Publl ) Notary Public, State of New York No. 01BU6098268 Qualified ~n Suffolk Page 3 of 3 - Appeal Application Part B: REASONS FOR USE VARIANCE (if requestecO: For Each and Every Permitted Use under the Zoning Regulations for the Partcular Dis~cf Whe the Project Js Located (please consult your attorney before completing): 1. Applicant cannot realize a reasonable return for each and every permltted use under the zoning regulations for the particular district where the property is located, demonstrated by compe.tenf financial evidence. The applicant CANNOT realize a REASONABLE RETURN beca~ (describe on a separate sheet). 2. The alleged hardship relating fo the property is unique because: 3. The alleged hardship does not apply to a substantial portion of the dis~ct or neighborhoc because: 4. The request will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood because: 5. The alleged hardship has not been self-created because: 6. This is the minimum relief necessary, while at the same time preserving and protecting th~ character of the neighborhood, and the health, safety and welfare of the community. (Plea~ explain on a separate sheet Jf necessary.) 7. The spirit of the ordinance will be observed, public safety and Welfare will be secured, an substantial Justice will be done because: (Please explain on a separate sheet if necessary.) ( ) Check this box and complete PART A, Questions on previous page to apply .~ VARIANCE STANDARDS. (Please cOnsult your attorney.) Otherwise, please proceed to signature and notmv area below. gnature of Appellant or Authorized Agent ent must submit Authorization from Owner) ZBA App 9/30/0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Please include with Z.B.A. Application) Applicant(s): ~ o~; I. Ifbuildin~ is existin~ and alterations/additions/renovations are oro~osed: A. Please g/ye the d/mensions and overall square footage of e~ions bcwond existing building: Dimensions/size: /,~ f.X ~ 2 Square footage: /! 7 ~ B. Please give the dimensions and square footage of new proposed foundation areas which do not ext~ b~ond the existirm building: Dimensions/size: Square footage: If a sign is proposed, please: A. Give dimensions of existing sign with photograph or sketch with details. B. Give dimensions of new sign. C. Is the new sign replacing an existing sign? Yes __ No __. If so, please explain: Please give dimensions and overall square footage of new oonstmetion: Dimension/size: Square foota~:. Height: I][I. Purpos~ and usc ofnew construction requested /n this. applicafion: ~: ~Ze'~r /q'~,Q[2 ' IV. Additional imeormation about the surrounding contours or neafoy builrlin~ flla,t relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): V. Please submit seven (7) photos/sets after staking comers of the proposed new construction. 7/02 APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics ~rchibits conflicts of interest on the mart of Town officers and omnlovces. The Duroose of this form is to vrovide information~ which can alit the Town ~f possible e~nflicts of in£~eSt and allow it to take whatever action is neo~.~ary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in th~ name of SOmeone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate thc other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance 'variance ~ Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exe~nption from Plat or Official Map ff "Other", name th~ a~ivity: Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Sonthold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or basiness interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officor or employee has ~ven a partial ownership of (or employm~t by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the YES NO r~ If y~u answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and dat~ and sign where indicated. Name of person.employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself (thc applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate Line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officor or employee or his or her spouse, sibling~ parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, direc~tor, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the ae'alal applicant. DESCRIlrrION OF RELATIONSHIP ., SHORT ENVIRO~AL , SSI~M~37'FORM · For UNI, ZEI'ED AC~ ~iON~I Only [~ )N~ ~SION ( )MOOIFI~TION/~ON 6. D~;De p~b~ What is present land use in vicinity of project: (describe): ' )Reside.[i.l ( )lndus'~al ( _~mmercial ( )Agricultural (/ParldF°rest/OpenSpac~ ( )Other O. Does acOon involve, pe~n/t approval or funcru19, now or ulUmatel¥ from any other Governmental agency,(Fede~a~, ~late ~' LocaJ). ( ) YES ~0 If Yet, list agency(s) and pe~mit/a ppm,rals: 11. Does any aspect of ~le action have a ctm'ently'valid pemlit or approval? (')YES ((~ ifYes, listagency(s)andpem~it/appmvals: ~2. As a result of proposed acl~on, ~ existing permit/approval require m~diflcation? )YES ~NO If Y., list agency(s) and pemflt/approva,.: WAREX TERMINALS CORPORATION P.O. Box 488, Newburgh, N.Y. 12551 (845) 561-4000 October 31, 2005 DSC Construction 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Town of Southold Southold, NY 11971 Re: Citgo Service Station Main Road & FactoD' Avenue Mattituck, NY To Whom It May Concern, I (undersigned), hereby Abizeid permission to apply for and receive all peru mentioned service station to construct a convenienc, .( oanne Conley v' ' Vice President .ye DSC Construction and George ts necessary to upgrade the above store and carwash. FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: December 27, 2005 REVISED: December 28, 2005 TO: Warex Terminal COrp. 9945 Route 25 Mattituck, NY 11952 Please take notice that your application dated December 7, 2005 For permit to add a convenience store use and a car wash bay for a car wash use in an existin~ ~as station at Location of property. 9945 Route 25, Mattimek, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 142 Block. ii Lot 2._27 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: 'x The p~oposed c~tmction, on this 24,829 square foot parcel in the B District, is not permitted pursuant to Article X Section 100-102, which states; "No building or p~.ini~es shall be used and no buildin~ or l~art thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same c~nforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parkin~ and LoarllnE Scheduies incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such re~' ]latlons were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet, foll6win~ the l~roposed construction, the build~n~ will have a side yard setback of+/- 2 feet. In addition, thc pfolJosed ear wash use requires special exception approval l~om the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Both proposed uses require site plan approval f~om the Southold Town Planning Board. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. WAREX TERMINALS CORPORATION P.O. BOX 488 NEWBURGH, N.Y. 12551 I Joanne Conley, Vice-President of Warex Terminals Corporation, hereby authorize Jo)~a~ Huttick, Architect, Don Cannetti, and Vivian D. Kamath to act as my ager~s on t'~e property of SCTM# 1000-142-01-27 in Southold, NY, and handle all ~ecessa~ work involved in/tb)e Variance Application and Site Plan Application ~vith the ~outhold Planning/Board. Notary Public, State of New V0rk Qualified in the County of Orange No. 4873118 APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~-~.,v'~ ~(J~/~ being du~sworn, deposes and says that.~e resides at in the State qf/~y York, an.d that he is the owner of the above property, or that. fn~/is the o, the (Title) (Specif, J whether Partnership or Corp.) which is hereby making application, that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. SIgne/ ,ne'er / ~.er or Corporate O~cer and ~e)~/' I%tary Public, State of New York Qualified in the County of Orange I~lo, 4873118 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: 10/25/07 * * * RECEIPT * * * Receipt~: 1009 Transaction(s): 1 1 Application Fees Reference Subtotal 142-1-27 $1,500.00 Check~: 1009 Total Paid: $1,500.00 I,!!i-~ 0CT 2 6 2007 Name: Gama, Properti se/~ Deer Park Inc Clerk ID: LYNDAB Internal ID: 142-1-27 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Olfl~'lCE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave,) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk From: Planning Department Date: October 24, 2007 Re: Checks Enclosed herewith is/are the check(s) listed. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Name & Type Tax Map Amount bate of ~ Check Warex 5ire Plan 142-1-27 $1,500 app fee 9/27/07 Blue Duck Baker~ SP 63~3-12 $500 app fee 8/14/07 LR encs. ST SITE PLAN TYPE: WITHDRAWN INCOI~"PLETE PROJECT NAM.E: ~qJ~l~. ~ ~_,o t~__4'-- ZONEI: ~) ZONE2:__ ZONE3:__ LOCATION: qq ~¢ ~ pa:,X:. HAMLET: ~ SCTM# 1000- 14'2-- I . IAPPLICANT NAME: ,, -' TEL# ( E~ST~GUSE: ~ $~ , ~ g~l~ PROPOSED USE:/ BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE: S/P REQUIRED Y OR N ZBA APPEAL REQUIRED Y OR N PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRITTEN REQUEST) NOTES: FNFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: ~:'PLICATION RECEIVED DATE:__/~/ , APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: PAYMENT RECEIVED: b {o-*.b_c_ ~ AMOUNT RECEIVED:$ qEW SP: $500./ACRE &.10/SF, AMENDED SP: $250. + A0/SF, AGRIC SP: FLAT $500 FEE AMOUNT: ($ .00X =$ ~ )+($.10X-~>O SF=$ ~&~:~ )=$ qEW APPLICATION WORK SESSION (WITHIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT), PB ACCEPTED Y OR N APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF REVIEW) BUILDING DEPARTMENT IviEEETING 100-254B3 ('WITHIN 30 DAYS) NOTES: REVISED SUBMISSION RECEIVED: NOTES: DATE / / / / / / REFEI~ED A~ENCIES~WIT},I MAPS=W/P)/ / .. / / {~ /ZZ-/Oc ST~BA v .STBD" .STC/TB~, JHv', STBT__,STE~.SCDHS ~ .NYSDEC~USACORPS__,NYSDOT~, SCWA__, SCPD~, SCDPW__, LXx~.p~ LEAD AGENCY: wos~m~,o'm~:__ R~VlEW: PARII_..j PAR? 2_~ Palll 3__, SIIORI EAF__, LONGEAF__ I ~1~1 ~ NOTES: ACTION ~PE: COO~I~TED:~ UNCOO~I~TED:~ (~PEI:~ ~PE2: UNLISTED:~) SEQ~DETE~ATION'NEGDECYORN, ~)~ ~/.~/~.~ ~.PPROVALS REQUIRED: REFERRED DATE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: .WRP COORDINATOR: ~/~Z/~.~_ ~IUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: FIRE COMMISSIONERS: tOWN ENGINEER APPROVAL: 3EP.OF TRANSPORTATION: DOT~DPW~, TOS SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING: SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH: PERMIT #: ~PTIONAL APPROVALS: NOTES APPROVAL DATE NOTES / / ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: FIELD INSPECTION FOR C/O: NOTES DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: SUILDING DEPT / / TOWN ENG / / J Eugene G. Kempey, P. E. 640 St nrise 11ighwa3 W. Babylon, New York 11704 T. 631-321-7777 F. 631-661-0486 December 12. 2007 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall. 53095 Main Road. Southold, New York 11971 ATTN: Mrs. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse RE: GAMA Properties / Warex Terminals 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-141-01-27 Zoning District: B Dear Mrs. Woodhouse, As per the Town Engineers letter on the abis'{/~ i-~'i~enced project dated December 3, 2007, the following are responses to the comments. The drainage calculations that have been provided on SP-Zbl indicate an increase in hardened Surfaces because as per the proposed site plan the existing landscaped area in the North of the property will be used for a drivexvay to enter the carwash tunnel, thus eliminating much of the landscape in the North of the property. As per the drainage calculations Existing and proposed square fbotages fbr lm~dscape asphalt and building/canopy have been shown. The existing pools size and depth will be shown. For the runoff from the Car Wash tunnel xve will install a catch basin that will tie into an existing drywell to prohibit any excess runoff from entering into Factory Avenue. We have altered the Site Plan to show a four loot minimtnn of landscaping between the Easterly and Westerly parking areas as per Section 280-95. We have taken this into consideration and we are proposing to add in several trees throughout the site to compensate for the removal of the existing trees located along the Northwesterly Property line. Eugene G. Kempey, P. 15. 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New' York 11704 T. 631-321-7777 F. 631-661-0486 The proposed pavement radius at the entrance of the Car Wash has been taken into consideration and with consnltation from Dunn Engineering who are our Traffic Consultants, have found this radius to be satisfactory. There will be a separate retaining wall that xvill be installed at this location to provide for the grade change. Guard rails will be installed at this location. Details will be provided with the revised Site Plans. 6. We have made a submission to the NYSDOT and are awaiting con-nnents. The area of dedication is flexible and ~ve are agreeable to reconfigure this parcel according to NYSDOT's comments and suggestions. If you have any questions or require any additional infbnnation, please advise. ~Sincerely,c'x ~) ~emln, Bruno From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Vincent Corrado [vcofrado@dunn-pc.com] Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1:38 PM Semon, Bruno Vivian Kamath (E-mail); George [NEWSENDER] - GAMA Realty Mattituck (Citgo, n/e/c Route 25 at Factory Avenue) - Message is from an unknown sender Trip gen letter.pdf Trip gen letter, pdf (85 Ks) Bruno Thanks for spending the time with us to go over the above on 12/3. Attached is a memo we sent to the Planning Board regarding comparisons between automated and full service car washes. Please call if you have any questions. VC <<Trip gen letter.pdf>> VINCENT ANGELO CORRADO P.E. Associate Engineer Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 631-288-2480 x1128 631-288-2544 Fax vcorrado~dunn-pc.com Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 631-288.2480 631-288-2644 Fax December 17, 2007 Ms. Jori Woodhouse, Chair Planning Board Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Car Wash Addition GAMA Properties N/E Comer NYS Rte. 25 Mattituck, NY Madam Chair and Members of the Board: This letter provides additional information requested at the planning board work session on December 3, 2007. As you may recall, the board sought reassurance that the number of vehicles estimated to be generated by the addition of an automated car wash to the existing gas station oporation at the above site represents a conservative examination of the potential impact on traffic due to the project. In our original traffic impact assessment, information provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers report "Trip Generation" (seventh edition) was utilized to estimate the number of trips anticipated due to the addition of an automated car wash to the site. Utilizing information in the report regarding automated car washes (Land Use Code 948) resulted in an estimated 18 (9 entering and 9 exiting) new trips during the weekday AM peak hour, and 22 ( 11 emoring and 11 exiting) new trips during the weekday PM peak hour. However, the infomaation provide in the report was based on studies at a small number of car washes, and no information was available on Saturdays for this land use. Therefore, the analysis performed in our original traffic study also considered data from the ITE report on full service car washes, known as conveyor type car washes in the industry. The information in the ITE report on full service car washes, under Land Use Code 946, estimated that a full service ear wash would generate 40 new trips (22 entering and 18 exiting), during the weekday AM peak, approximately double the number of trips estimated using the data on automated car washes. Similarly, 38 new trips (17 entering and 21 exiting) during the weekday PM peak were predicted, 73% higher than predicted using the data on automated car washes. In the interest of providing a conservative worst-case estimation of the potential traffic impact of the proposed car wash addition, the higher numbers predicted using the full service car wash data was utilized in all analysis performed for our study. Madam Chair and Members of the Board December 17, 2007 Page 2 In order to reassure the board that in fact thc information in our study does provide a conservative estimate, information regarding characteristics for several types of car washes was obtained. A report provided by representatives of the car wash industry regarding activities at different types of car washes indicates that the number of washes per year at a full service car wash can be expected to be 50% higher than at an automated car wash. In raral areas, the disparity was found to be even higher. Trips generated by automated ear washes of the type proposed in this project were found to be approximately half the number generated by a typical full service (conveyor) type ear wash. Nationwide, the average full service ear wash provided 82,000 washes per year, while the average automated car wash provided 54,200. In rural areas, the report indicates that the average full service car wash provided 48,177 washes per year, while the average automatic car wash provided 23,583 washes per year. Thus, it can be seen that data provided by the car wash industry supports the fact that automated car washes can be expected to generate significantly less traffic than full service car washes, and that the estimates of potential new trips utilized in the analyses performed in out original traffic assessment present a conservative worst case scenario. Since the results of those analyses indicate that the addition of the traffic generated by the proposed car wash will have minimal impact on the adjacent roadway network, and that the layout of the proposed ear wash can successfully accommodate the conservatively estimated number of trips, we recommend that, based on transportation engineering considerations, the project be approved. Thank you for your continued attention to this matter. If you have any questions, or need any further information, please call me. Enjoy the holiday season. Vincent A. Corrado, P.E. Associate Engineer VC:as L207376 P26069 Vivian Kamath, DSC Construction, via e-mail Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold, via e-mail DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C. 66 Main Street WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 (631) 288-2480 (631) 288-2544 Fax TO: Town of Southold Planning Department PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 WE ARE SENDING YOU: / x Attached Under separate cover via Shop drawings Prints Plans Samples Copy of letter Change order LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: 11/2/20071JOB NO. ATTENTION: Am}' Thiel RE: GAMA Properties (Warex) the following items: Specifications Copies Date No. Description 3 Nov-07 Traffic Impact Assessment for Proposed Car Wash THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit X For your use Approved as noted Submit X As requested Returned tot corrections Return For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE: copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints REMARKS: Amy Enclosed are 3 copies of the reportl emailed to you on Fdday. The applicant has resubmitted the revised report to I~"~SDOT for their review as well. Please call if you have an}, questions. //// //// Vincent A. Corrado, PE Dunn Engineering Associ~J~es, P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 63'1-288-2480 631-288-2544 Fax November 2, 2007 Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp. 640 Sunrise Highway 6West Babylon, NY 11704 Rc: Traffic Engineering Assessment Proposed Car Wash Addition N/e comer NYS Rte. 25 Mattituck, NY Dear Mr. Kamath: As requested, Dunn Engineering Associates PC has completed our professional traffic engineering evaluation in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the existing gasoline station, located on the northeast comer of Main Road (NYS Route25) at Factory Avenue, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The project envisions the expansion of the existing convenience store and addition of an automatic car wash to the gasoline station. Figure 1 shows the location of the project site and Figure 2 shows the boundaries of the property and the adjacent roadway network. Our examination was performed to evaluate the potential traffic impact of the proposed development, including trip generation, access, roadway capacity and safety. During the course of the study, the following specific work tasks were performed: 1. Several personal visits to the site to attest to our observations of existing traffic movements at various times of the day and under different conditions. 2. Collection and analysis of existing traffic data as available from the Town of Southold, New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. Estimates of the additional traffic that will be generated by the proposed project. These estimates were based on information provided in the latest (7th) edition of the report Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. FIGURE 1 ~ DUNN ENGINEERING AREA MAP ^SSOC~ATES, FIGURE 2 SITE MAP DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 (631) 288-2480 Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 4 Examination of thc ability of the strcct network to accommodate the additional volumes that will be generated by the proposed use. Intersection capacity analyses was perforated at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Aveoue and Factory Avenue at the site access driveway for the following scenarios: a. 2008 No-Build Traffic b. 2008 Build Traffic 5. Examination of access to and from the site and the parking area from the standpoint of location and design. 6. Evaluation of the geometric features of the proposed queue storage area. 7. Preparation of a letter report setting forth our findings and conclusions. The following sections present the results of our efforts in this regard. Existing Conditions As previously stated, the site is located on the northeast corner of NYS Route 25, Main Road, at Factory Avenue, in Mattituck. The gas station is surrotmded on two sides by a shopping center. At present, the site contains a gas station with eight fueling stations, two service bays that are currently unused, and a small convenience store. The site has access to both NYS Route 25 and to Factory Avenue. There is one existing driveway on Factory Avenue and two on Main Road. In order to determine the amount of traffic being generated by the existing use of the site, traffic counts were performed at the three existing site driveways during the weekday 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM peak periods, and during the Saturday Midday peak period. The results of these traffic counts are presented in Table 1. As can be seen, the weekday AM peak hour occurs between 7:00 an 8:00 AM, when 28 vehicles entered the site and 30 vehicles left the site, and the weekday PM peak hour occurred between 4:00 and 5:00 PM, when 32 vehicles entered the site and 33 left the site. On Saturday, 53 vehicles entered the site and 46 vehicles left the site during the peak hour, which occurred between 1:00 and 2:00 PM. Existing Gas Station Traffic 28 30 38 34 53 46 Table 1 Site Generated Traffic Existing Gas Station with Convenience Store Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 5 Main Road is a New York State highway facility that provides direct access to the site. Although NYS Route 25 extends the entire length of Long Island, it serves as Main Street for many of the communities along the north fork of Long Island, including Mattituck. Near the site of the proposed development, Main Road provides one lane in each direction, flanked by shoulders, with additional turning lanes at major intersections. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Development along Main Road near the site is primarily commercial. According to information provided by New York State Department of Transportation, the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on Main Road in Mattituck in 2004 was 12849 vehicles per day. Note that AADT is a transportation engineering and planning term defined as the average traffic volume at a given location on any day of the year, including weekends, and is not utilized in detailed analyses. The intersection of NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue is controlled by a traffic signal that is maintained by NYSDOT. This signal also controls the northbound approach of Sigsbee Avenue, which is off-set to the west from Factory Avenue. Factory Avenue forms an acute angle with Maine Road, as it is skewed to the northeast. The very tight turning radius presents difficulties for vehicles turning from westbound Main Road onto northbound Factory Avenue, particularly trucks. Future Site Trip Generation The current site plan for the proposed development envisions the expansion of the existing small convenience store, and the addition of an automated carwash to the site. The eight fueling stations will be retained, and the service bays will be removed. Information contained in the report "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, was consulted to estimate th_.e number of new trips expected to be generated by the proposed project. Under Land Use ~rt~_~.-)~~utomated Car Wash, the ~ITE report presents data on trip making characteristics for a stand-alone car wash. Automated car washes are defined in the ITE report as "facilities that allow for the mechanical cleaning of the exterior of vehicles". Although, some of the sites in the ITE report l~rovided auto detailing and other relat~_se_~_ic~s.,_0n~l~ ~xterior cleanin~ is proposed ~ sit~e o~'-m~ehor-¢t~aning-§~ices are to be provide~ The information in the report ~f~ ~ ~.~inndicates that a car wash of the s,ze prop'~sed under this application might be expected to generate 18 ew trips (9 entering and 9 exiting) during the weekday PM peak hour and 22 new trips (11 entering Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 6 site would generate a total of 98 trips during the weekday AM peak hour, and 110 trips during the weekday PM peak hour. This represents an increase of 40 new trips in the AM and 38 during the w.eekday PM above the e"-xisting traffic. On Saturda~is metbodolo~g~results in a'total q~ !n__ps 32 en_led_n~hich is considerably higher than the ITE report predicts that a new standalone automated car wash would generate, and is in fact greater than a new fidl service car wash j,w~uld generat~t'g~' n(~i~..~at information provided by the applicant regarding automated car 'i ~shes indicted ii'at the number of washes at a .... : a . utomated car washes ~~and 50~/o of fulL-~-4Yl~ serwce car washes. Therefore, use of this methodoloev result~ss i~n an extremely consc~rvativc estimate of the traffic expected to be generated by the site. it should also be noted ~'at not all the traffic visiting the car wash would be new traffic added to the roadway.n_etwork. Rather, it is likely that some portion of the traffic would akeady be on tl~road__wa_.y networ~k for another purpose, and will visit the car wash as part of t~multipurpose trip. ~I0waker, for the purposes of this report, it has ~'@.eeu assumed that all the traf~i~visitin~ the-'P~osed car wash would ~- .......... ~- -'- ' '-4uppr)rhng ~ conservative ~vorst-case evaluagtioh. This trip generation informat on is presented in Table 2. The site-generated traffic was then((4is[ributed on the new driveway configur~nd on the roadway net~vork~ It has been assumed tha{ i~h~ h~W ~{{~' ~n~raTi~-d-i-i-3t~'~T ~'~ have origins and destinations similar to the traffic already visiting the site. Note that the existing gas station traffic. was also redistributed on the roadway network to reflect the new driveway configuration. Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash 50 48 55 55 N/A N/A LUC 946 Less Existing Gas Station Traffic 28 30 38 34 53 46 Total New Site Generated Traffic 22 18 17 21 32* 28* text for explanation. Table 2 Site Generated Traffic Gas Station with Convenience Store and Car Wash Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 7 Access Examination As stated, there are curret~tly three driveways serving the site, two on Main Road and one on Factory Avenue. The westerly driveway on Main Road is located less than 25 feet east of Factory Avenue. The driveway on Factory Avenue is located less than 50 feet north of Main Road and less than 20 feet north of the stop line for southbound traffic at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue. In keeping with good access management practices and in conformance with NYSDOT's policy regarding driveways on State highways, the w..~eesternmost driveway_on Main Road will be eliminated. The remaining driveway on Main Road will be configured to allow for right turn~y into and out of the site. Left and right turns into and out of the site will be permitted at the driveway on Factory Avenue. Note also that car wash patrons will have access only to Factory Avenue and no internal access to the car wash will be possible from the fueling area. While this driveway configuration is not considered ideal, the access design reflects the desire on the d~ected by on-site signing to access the car wash by turning onto Factory Avenue from Main Road. Finally, note that, as re u n the applicant has attempted to obtain access to the park!r~g _lot of the adjacent shopping center property, c~Ho~-Wever, the owner of that property ~ c2__unwilling to provide access at thi? fime.~q'he applicant remain~ Willing to enter into a cross access> agreement with the adjacent property owner. Intersection Capacity Analyses In order to ensure that the proposed project willr_.__not haye any. detrimental_impact on. qE_Eperating conditirms-on the roadway network, and to ensure that the site driveways will operate in a safe and efficient manner, without undue delay for vehicles entering and leaving the proposed development, signalized and unsignalized intersection capacity analyses have been performed. These capacity analyses were performed utilizing software based on the methodologies set forth in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, and utilized the traffic volumes described above, adjusted to reflect peak summer season, and the estimates of new vehicles expected to be generated by the proposed development, and also reflect the traffic generated by the new CVS drugstore on itie southwest corner of Main Road at Factory Avenue. The results of these capacity analyses indicate that excellent levels of service can be expected to prevail at the driveway, and that no undue dela~ to vehicles traveling on Factory Avenue will occur. In addition, the low volumes new traffic generated by the project will have minimal impact on operating conditions at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue, and no deterioration in the levels of service at this intersection will occur during the three peak hours examined. During the weekday AM peak, the intersection will function at LOS C, and no deterioration in LOS is predicted due to the proposed project. Similarly, Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 8 during the weekday PM and Saturday peak, LOS D is predicted and again no changes occur due tO the proposed project. N9te that these capacity analyses have been prepared using the extremely conservative worst case projections for site generated traffic for the proposed site. Copies of the results of these intersection capacity analyses are attached. Turning Radius Improvement · , / As previously stated, the tum]ng radius for westbound Main Road to northbound Factory Avenue is //~/59-. In order to assist the Town of Southold and/or NYSDOT in improving this existing deficiency, the ir l~plicant is willing to dedicate property on the northeast comer of the sitez, o tllat a lar~er tumin ~t--~ ~ radius can be lnstalled~h~ ap~ox]mate area of this dedication is shown on the site nlah~ ~ · J Car Wash Queue t~ ~ ,~,-' > The site plan shows queuing storage for e~leven vehicles on-site. Based on wa~me of thr~_~ i/ ~. ,og_c~n~tes per 3e~d queuing for eleven vehicles 31 vehicles er hour can he nroce~o; J4 /> ~ o~gn-s~f_~The con~_e~ativ~timat~ of site-generated traffic prepared for this study indicate ~a~-~--'a '-- ~_~ maximnm ,~f' i'~~ x~h;,-l~e per hour w0h]d v~Sit ~1/~ ~ar w3:ghT. Shus, more than sufficient queue storage space is available to ensure that all vehicl~ to use-~the car wash could be stored on the site, and no vehicles would need to wait on Factory Avenue to access the car wash. Conclusions t,,l ~ ;[~ Although the site will generate additional traffic, this traffic can be adequately accommodated by -' the existing roadway network. 2. Intersection capacity analyses performed in accordance with the methodology set forth in the 2000 edition of the H~ghway Capacity Manual indicate that the additional traffic generated by the proposed development will have minimal impact on operations at the signalized intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue. 3. In keeping with good access management practices, the site plan for the project proposes a single driveway on Main Road and two driveways on Factory Avenue· One existing driveway on Main Road will be closed· · 4.The access driveways will operate in a safe and efficient manner, without causing undue delays. 5. The applicant remains willing to enter into a cross access arrangement with the adjacent shopping center property, at such time as the property owner would be willing to provide cross access. Mr. Vivian Kamath Nove~nber 2, 2007 Page 9 6. More than sufficient queue storage will be available on the site so that no vehicles will need to wait on Factory Aven. ue to access the car wash. 7. The applicant is willing to dedicate property on the northeast comer of Factory Avenue at Main Road to facilitate the improvement of the existing turning radius deficiency at that location. In light of the foregoing, and based on professional transportation engineering considerations, it is ~rrecommel~ded that the proposed project be approved. If you have any questions or need any further information, please call me. i~ent Corrad6-~ P.E. Associate Engineer VC:as L207329 P26069 Attachments ¢;ene_ral I~nt.o_fn]ation __ . Arr,dys~ VC Agency or Co. DE,4 Date Podormed 10'30/07 Time Pedod Weekday AM Peak Hour ....... ~.ite ]m'orzr ¢t_io~n Area fype Jurisdiction AnaJysis Yea* Pioject ID Szgsbee f?d FactoQ ,4 ye Al~ otho; nre.]s To,wi of SouthoM. NYSDOT 2008 No Uufld (Se~sAd]ust) Citgo Volume and Timing Input qumber of lanes, N, _ane group /oiume, V (vph) o Heavy vehicles, %HV ~eak-hour factor, PHF ~retimed (P) or actuated (A) ;tad-up lost time, I~ !xtension of effective green, e ,rrival type, AT Init extension, UE iltering/motering, I ,itial unmet demand, Qb ] O0 I O.O_._~____-- ed / Bike / RTOR volumes aoewidth j 11.0 112,0 arking/Grade / Parking I N I 0 arking maneuvers, Nm uses stopping, Na j 0 I O in. time for pedestrians, Gp 3,2 hasing I EB Only I EW Perm EB I WB I NB I SB 0 .j_o. I 32 o~o j 0.0 _10.o j__ Io.o j_o.o I,~0.0 I,oo j ,0.0 i,o.o- ~0 I~ ~! o IN 32 I 3.2 uration of Analysis, T = 0.25 I I Cycle Length, C 80.0 ~ ~dup (2~padfty, Control Oe~ay, and LOS Determination : ' ~ ~ ~' .......... LT iTH L mILT me groupcapacity, c I 182~1174 I .J 313 0 11 '064 --_ -- ,tel green ratio, g/C J 0.11 I .... J j 0 49 ~iform delay, d, ~ ¢*' I ~ ro. o ;renlenta, delay, d2 J 1.0_J-2.4 tie ClLe~odelay, d3 I ___ / ,ntroldelay 34.0 ~ 107 I ~ 112 proach delay proach LOS 3mection delay WB J NB / SB i THRTI UT I TH IRT] LT TH ~W I~¢~ ~ I I o.¢¢ I-o,¢ I~ o.¢~ / o.~. I-o.~ j ] _~o., I~ ~.,~o. I,o¢o~- j-~,.ooo i,.oo~ I,.ooo Jo I J_ I~ Jo I Ic I~ 29.0 ]~ .... ~ intersection [ OS C 'i : ENGINEERIN ~ CIATES NEW YORK 11978 FILE NAME: [AM [ TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION: TIME PERIOD: DONE BY: IMAIN ROAD (NYS ROUTE 25) A'r SIGSBEE ROAD / FACTORY, AVENUE IDEA/VC EXISTING YEAR: HORIZON YEAR: APPROACH ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES DEC. 2006 eXlST*NG 9 ~ ~3 ~4 ~ ~ ~ ~6~ ~ ~ S~S 22 DTHER DEVELOPMENTS 1) CVS Pharmacy 12 4 C 2 3 0 6 13 5 2 C 0 ~) 0 0 6 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 3) 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 C 0 0 su~umA~ 12 4 0 2 3 C 0 13 5 2 0 0 SITE TRAFFIC Add Car Wash 9 1 0 7 0 7 9: 0 0 0: 3 8 ':: ;12 :': ~8":,75~ ~ :38 VC Agency or Co DEA Pate Pedormed 103,007 Fime Period Weekday/AM Pe:~k Hou~ Volume and Timing Input Site Information [ntorsectJon Area Type gLldsdiction AnaJysis Year Project ID Main Rd & SIgsbeeFld,'FactoryA ve All othe~ areas Town of SouthoM, N YSDO · 2008 Build (SeasAdjust) Citgo ~lumber of lanes, Nr ane group /olume, V (vph) Heavy vehicles, %HV )eak-hour factor, PHF 'retimed (P) or actuated (A) ;tart-up rost time, ~, xtension of effective green, e rrival type, AT ~nit extension, UE iltering/metering, I dtial unmet demand, Qb od / Bike / RTOR volumes ane width arking / Grade / Parking arking maneuvers, Nm uses stopping, N8 in. time for pedestrians, Gp Jration of Analysis, T = 0.25 ~b ~rOb~ ca~ity, cO~Eoi O~iay, ~nd NB I LT I TH~ .Rr~ J 1 I_o~ _t~ I-- __J_ I I IoLol__ Y= 5.9 0 N I,ooo i ,_oo_o jo.o 1oo Io I~ 3.2 Ijusted flow rate, v tne group capacity, c : ratiOr X )tal green ratio, g/C fiortn delay d~ egress on factor, PF )ray calibration, k lial queue delay, d3 ,ntror delay ne group LOS proach delay proach LOS emection delay J33.3 13 ~ 24 128 B 30.~9 10,8 -- I 050 I 0.4 --I 11.2 46.0 I_ D I1.000 ____J I 1 03 I J 34.6 J __ C Intersection LOS 34 9 FILE NAME: INTERSECTION: TIME PERIOD: DONE BY: ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY HORIZON YEAR: APPROACH RQADtFA¢~rORYAVENUE I General Information Analys~ VC Agency o~ Co. DEA Date Performed Time Period Weekdoy PM Peak Hour Volume and Timing Input Information Areu Type Judsdiction Analysis Year Project ID Main Rd & S~gsbeeRd Fmctoo,Ave All other a~eas Town of SouthoM NYSDO / 2008 No Build ($onsAd]ust! Citgo _ EB j WB LT ] TH ~RT J L] ] TH ] BT ~umOer o, ,anes, L TR 18 769 2 'retimed(P) oractuated(A) I a I p I p J_ p j p I p 20 Init extension, U~ litial unreel demand, ab 0.0 ~.0 ~ 0 j~ 0 arking, Grade, Parking arking maneuvers, ~m uses stopping, NB in. time for pedestrians, Gp I 3.2 I 3.2 32 I--- 3.2 '~asing I EB Only I EW Perm I 03 04 I SB Only I NB Only I 07 I 08 ~: 8o~=,~.~ ~= ~= i~: ~.~ l~~ 1~: ~=-- .]ration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cyc e Leng h C = 80 0 ' RT ' 107 1059 ,tal green ratio, g/C j0.08 liform delay, d1 ~ 12 8 ,lay oal, ration, k ,n,rol delay preach delay ~ 28.5 Genera/i~formation Analyst VC Agency or Co. DEA Date Performed Time Period Weekday PM Peak Hour Volume and Ti~ing Input Site Information Main Rd & SigsbeeR c/ Fc]ctoryA ve All other areas Town of Southold, NYSDOT 2008 BuiM (SeasAd/ust) Citgo Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID EB I WB 1. NB I SB LT j~TH IRT J LT j TH ] ~ ~ TH ~ RT LT J~ R qumber of lanes, ., ' ~/ 0 I ' I/~- O I-O X ' I ' I- 0 I ' I~ anegroup L~ , TR , __~ i9 TR ~___ j~, LT~~~ LT , t~ /olume, V(vph) '06 [923 L28 ~.Z ~ 25 j 35 ~ 2,~ 19 1~-21 ~ 101 '; Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 ~ ~ I 4 ~ 2 j 2 'eak-hourfactor, P.F ~0.88 ~0.88 ~0.88 ~0.88 10.88 0.88 ~0.88 ~~0.88 ~0.88 I~ 'retimed(P) or actuated (A) A ~ , I ' I ' Im ' I~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ 20 20 --~ ;xtensio~ofeffec vegreen, e 3.7 I 4.1 I ~ 4,1 ~ 41 ~ ~ 39 3.9 --~ ~ 3.9 I 3.9 Initextension, UE 3.0 I 3.0 ~ 3.0 3.0 ~ ~ I 3.0 ~ 3.0 ~ -- ~ ed/Bike/RTORvolumes I 0 ~ ~ 0 -- j 0 ~~ anewidth j 110 j 12.0 I ]100 j 115J ~ 10.0 ii0.0 j~ 10.0 j 10.0 arking/Grade/Parking IN I~I_ N--[ N I~/~ ~ N 0 ~--N I N ~-0 I N arking maneuvers' Nm ~--J- ~ I ~ J.-- I ~ l~ I~ "ses st°pping, N8 j 0 ~ 0 ~ } ~ 0 J--~l I0 I0 I 0 I 0 in. time for pedestrians, Gp [ 3.2 3.2 { - 3.2 I 3.2 ming 5.0 IG= 37,9 G= JG= 79 j~= 5.6 JG= uration of Analysis, T = 0,25 ~ ~ Cycle Length, C = 80.0 I LT ' T~~ ' R- ! , WB , J~ NB Sk ......... ' ~ q~~. / [ LT [ TH J_ RT } LT I TH [RT [ ET TH J R F ,Justedflowrate, v ~ 120 11081 [ ~_22 ~ 922 ~ J ~ 64 } 18 ~ ~ 167 [ *' me group capacity, c ~ '~¢ J''¢¢ I I * I¢¢¢ ~ ~- ',¢¢ ' ,¢¢ ' ~o~' ; ratio, X d-O 84 I~ , , - q ] I I ~ 18 ~ ~green rat,o, g/C [0.08 0.~ II O.¢O J O.¢O J J~ 0.0~ I O0¢ I 0,~ 0,' - ~iform delay d~ 36 1 132 ~1 -- - ~ "~ ' ~ -"~ -- I ' I ' I I .4 d 20.0 I J~~ 33.3 ~ I 34,2 ~ 3~ ~ l,.ooo i,.ooo L I_ ,ooo d,.ooo j-i,.ooo I,.,,o ' /°-¢~ I°-¢° I Io.¢o jo~ojj qo.,, io.,, I~m~¢ I~ tiatqL'euedelay'd3 I-~.~1 ~ I I ---J~__l ~1 I ~J_ DUN N ENGINEERING 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON FILE NAME: ITM TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION: TIME PERIOD: DONE BY: IMAIN ROAD (NYS ROUTE 25) AT,SIGSBEE R_O.~D! FACTORYAVENUE I ALT X CLEARS ISAT I EXISTING YEAR: iDEA/Vc iHORIZON YEAR: APPROACH DEC. 2006 EX,STING 10920 93 15 '7 80 ~1, .~ :1 ~,)~1 '60L 27 1) Cvs Pham~r, cy 34 10 C 5 5 0 01 23J ~ol 41 ol o ~) 0 0 C 0 I 0 0 01 01 01 01 01 0 ~ 0 0 C 0 0 C o/ ol ol ol ol o ~) o c ~ o o ~'""'" 34 1C 0 . 5 BUILD TRAFF C 5 ~eneral Information ~,nalyst VC ~gency or Co DEA )ate Performed 103007 -ime Period SJturctny MMday Peak Hour /olume and Timing Input DE r,,\!LED REPOFiT Site Information Intersection MJfl~ Rd & SigsbeeRd'FactoryAve Area Type Afl other areas J u risdiction Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty Analysis Year 2008 No Build (SeasAdiust) Project ID Citgo Jumbor of lanes, N ane group 'olume, V (vph) nit extension, UE j~.O itial unme demand, Qu I O.O j 0.0 ~J O.O I0-0 I I.-'-~ l-O.O _ O0 O0 ~d ' Bike ,' RTOR volumes ]ne width ,ses slopping. N~ Y= 5.7 Y= 6.1 JY= y= Y= 5,9 Y= 5. g jy= ~ration of Analysis, T = 0.25 J J Cycle Length, C = 120,0 ~ ~ TH IRT / LT I TH ~ RT UT TH IRT [ LT TH RT ne group capaoty, c ~1199 remontal delay d~ 132 8 R 7 ~,nalyst ~,gSncy or Co. )ate Pedormed Fime Period VC DEA 10/30/07 Saturday Midday Peak Hour /~h~me ahd Timing Input h~tersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID Main Rd & SIgsbeeRd FactoryA ve Afl other areas Town of Southold, NYSDOT 2008 Build (SeasAd. lust) Citgo LT ,lumber of lanes, N~ 1 .ane group L /olume, V (vph) 137 ;~ Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 ~eak-hour factor. PHF I 0.90 'retimed (P) or actuated (A) I A ;tart-up lost time, I~ I 2.0 ixtension of effective green, e ,rrival type, AT EB I WB I TH 895 I 2.0 RT I_~T 2 I_~ _2.0 init extension, UE iltering/metering, I I1'000 11'000 I ed~i~e~o~volumes I ° ____j o arking / Grade / Parking I~ Io uses st°pping' NB I0 I0 in. time for pedestrians, G? I 3.2 hasing I EB Only I EW Perm G= 10.0 IG= 64.0 ming Y= 5 IY= 5 I 03 -G = 04 I SB Only I NB Only 07 I 08 I Cycle Length, C ~ 120.0 I.__, 19 I,oo 1 ;o.o j.__1,0.o _119.% Io I~ I~ I© 3.2 I 3.2 uration of Analysis, T = 0.25 EB I LT TH RT I LT 152~ 1013 40 I°'1° I°'~8 I-- I°.55 44.6 4.6 - 4.5 wa I NB I SB ~justed flow rate, v ~ne group capacity, c : ratio, X ~tal green ratio, g/C ~iform delay, d~ ogression factor, PF day calibration, k ;remontal delay, d2 rial queue delay, d3 )ntrol delay ne group LOS ,preach delay ,preach LOS TH IRT 1.ooo I 11.70 -I,.t¢0 I t D E ersection delay 48.6 Intersection LOS i D APPEALS BOARD MEMBI~$ Oernrd F. Ooeh~mger, Chnimmn Chntles Otigon/~, Ir, Serge Doyen, James D/niz~o. Jr. Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOAIU) OF APPEAL~ TOWN OF $OUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BO.~RD OF APPEALS SCOTT L HARRIS Town ~ 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 8outhold, New York 11971 Fax (516~ 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Upon application of SUN REFINING & Fu%P~ETING CO. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section 100-102: (1) for permission to establish convenience store use in conJ~nction with and accessory to the existing gasoline station use on this substandard parcel which contains less than 30,000 sq. ft. in lot ares for each use, and (2) for interpretation as to the height limitation of accessory [canopy} structure, and (3) for approval of canopy structure in the front yard location. Location of Property= Corner of the Easterly Side of Factory Avenue and Northerly Side of the Main Road, Mattituck, NY; District 1000, Section 142, Block 1, Lot 27. W~EEEAS, a public hearing was held on November 1, 1990 and continued on November 29, 1990, in the Matter of the Application of SUN REFINING & MARInaTING CO. under Appeal No. 3788; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WH~, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation sulxaitted coneer~ing this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familla~ with the.preauLses in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and Wn/u~kAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. T~ne premises inq ueation is a corner lot with 158.0 feet along the east side of Factory Avenue and with 198.0 feet along the north side of the Main Road, in the Hamlet of Mattituck, Town of SoHthold, and more particularly identified on the Suffolk Co%tnty Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 142, Block 1, Lot 27. 2. The subject pre~ees contains a total area of 24,139 sq. ft., is located in the "B" ~eneral Business Zone District, and is improved with a 30' x 66' principal building and two gasoline service (concrete] islands, all as shown:on Drawing No. Page 2 - Appl. No. 88 Matter of SUN REFINING & MARKETING 'Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 13-1318 (Rev. 11) as updated October 29, 1990, prepared by Sun Refining & Marketing Company. 3. By this application, the appellant requests Variances: (a) to convert the existing principal building from gasoline sales and vehicle/engine repairs to gasoline sales and accessory convenience store for the on-premises.sales of packaged food and nonfood items, withouton-premises food s~rvices, incidental to andin conjunction with the existing gasoline service station use, and (bi for approval of the location of a new 30 ft. by 103 ft. canopy over new gasoline pumps/islands with its closest set-backs at 29 ~eet fro~the westerly property line along Factory Avenue and at 29 feet from the southerlyproperty line along the Main Road, as shOwnon Drawing 13-1318-M (Rev. 2) dated September ~14, 1988 (also revised May 7, 1990), at a3 height at not more than 18 feet above ground. 4. For the record, it is noted that under previous Action of this Board under Appl. No. 1225 rendered janUary 2, 1969, a Special Exception was granted for a gasoline service and indoor repair station. 5. In considering this application, it is the understanding of the Board Members that the items to be sold would include small variety store items, such as packaged and canned foods, magazines, refrigerated items, mtcrowaved items, and the like. 6. The following information.is also noted for the record: (a) the premises has continuously for the past 22 years been used as an office for sales of gasoline and other incidental merchandise, with small engine/vehicle repairs within the enclosed three bay areas of the principal building, and gasoline 'sales at the pumps; (b) the use as a convenience store is to be used accessory and incidental to the gasoline-service station and not as a separate principal use or business establishment; (c) the existing vehicle lifts and (three) bay areas will be eliminated and replaced with the accessory convenience store use; (d) the.principal building will not be enlarged without prior approval of the Board of Appeals by st~bsequent application; Matter of SUN' REFINING & MAi~KETING Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 (e) also noted is the interpretation of the board, as' requested'by the aPPlicant, in that the subject canopy stracture is an accessorystructure, limited to the 18-ft. maximum height requiiement {and not the height limitation for a principal building at 35 feet}, an~ subject, of Course, to the rules as apply to accessory structures. 7. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (a) the subject parcel is surrounded by other properties to the north, west, eas~, and south of the Main Road which'are also located and used as regulated by the General Business "B" Zone District; (b) thevariance, as conditionally noted below, the minimum necessary to. afford relief; (c) the accessory use as authorized will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; (d) the difficulties are unique, are not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood, and are not personal in nature; (e) there is no other feasible method for appellants to pursue other than a variance;. · (f) the relief as conditionally granted will not prevent the orderly and reasonable .use of this district or of adjacent use districts; (g) the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and order of the Town will not be adversely affected by.the. proposed business use and its location; (h) in light of all of the above, the interests of j.uStice will .be served by granting the'variances requested and as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested for permission to convert the existing principal building for sales of gasoline and related items, together with an accessory convenience store, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Page 4 - Appl. NO. 3788 Matter of SUN REFINIMG & MAP/~ETING Decision Rendered January 11, 1991 1. No cooking, except by portable microwave; 2. No food preparation (must be pre-packaged - inclu&ling cold cuts and sandwiches); 3. No table service or seating for public use; 4. No signs advertising the convenience store use, except by approval of the Board of Appeals; 5. All engine/vehicle repairs and/or car washing services muat cease; 6. No drive-thru or drive in services; 7. Convenience store sales shall be limited to eelf=eervice (including vending machines, refrigerators}; 8. Convenience store is permitted only as an acceesoryuse incidental to the principal use as a gasoline service station (as proposed herein) and within the principal building only, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance for the canopy structure of a size 30 ft. by 103 ft., 29 feet from the westerly property line (along Factory Avenue) and 29 feet from bhe southerly property line (along the State Highway), provided that the canopy structure not exceed 18 feet in height in the front yard area, as applied. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen and Dinizio. (Absent was: Member Grigonis due to illness.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERA~D P. GOEHRINGER, ~A~RMAN Gera~ P: Goeb~inger,'Chairman Serge Doyen, Jr. James'Din~o, Jr. Robert A, ,ViI~ Richard C. Wiit~n BOARD 0 F APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southoid Town Ha~l 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1:L¥9 Southold, New York ~1971 Fax (516) 765-1823: Telephone (516) 765-1809 R~I~:'EEQ~ST~: ~OPY s~ over ~ ~ p~ps D~ ~:~.~t~ 9/22/94 pre~d by MOT.ION ~DE BY: ACTION]~OL~ION' ~TED: App~v~ ~on ~'hc~o~ ~opy P~:~e ~ appHe~; (3) s~b~ect ~ o~ appH~ble ff~ ~d s~ ~ ~e ~old To~ Zo~ ~e. VOTE OF THE BOARD: Ayes: Se~ J. D~en, Member rite lc) The variance (does) Cdce~ not) -observe the spirit of the Ordinance end (would) change the cl~racter of the diztrict because (would not) located At a meeting on April 3, 1969, a motion was made and carried to correct error in item ~ 2 (above). It should read as follows: 2. Pumps, lubricating, and other devices shall be w*mYwd~at least 15 feet from the line of any stree~r highway, right-of-way or property line. SUBIMAL CHAKRABOrtl, F~e. R EG)ONAL DIRECTOR July 7, 2006 Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp. 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Dear Mr. Kamath: STATE Of NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION TEN 250 VETERANS M~MORI~L Highway t <. =~.dot.state.ny. us ;~>'" ~.~ JUL I I 2006 [[ I S0uthold '~ow~ ~ ?lannin[ Boar~ .I ~ i Town of Southold June 22, 2006 Submission Proposed Site Plan for Warex Proiect 9945 Main Road Site Plan Dated 11/22/05, Last Revision 5/30/06 Route 25, Southold SCTM 1000-142-1-27 Our Case No. 01-99P THOMAS J. MADISON, JR. COMMISSIONER We are writing to advise you that the Town of Southold has informed us that you are proposing work at the subject site located on the northeast comer of Route 25 and Factory Ave. In order for you to initiate the Highway Work Permit process so we can provide a comprehensive review of this site please submit four (4) sets of plans that include all of the information noted on the attached checklist. The following items shall also be addressed by your submission: In recent years, many states have employed access management as a major technique to address conflicts between through traffic and that generated by developments. The goals of access management are to limit the number of access points, separate conflict points and remove turning traffic from through movements. New York State is utilizing this technique to minimize impacts to State highways. We recommend, therefore, that cross access to this site be obtained from adjacent properties. If this is not presently possible, it should be shown on the plans for implementation as part of future redevelopment. Work along this section of Route 25 was recently completed by the CVS opposite this site. As part of our review of the CVS site we recommended all access be removed from Route 25 as the site had access to the local road network. In the interest of public safety and increasing mobility along this busy con'idor we recommend right turn ingress only for this site. The Route 25 access must be designed to promote that movement and the access radius shall be offset from the property line a minimum of five (5) feet as per our driveway policy. Please reference our Policy for access on our website at www.dot.state.n¥.us/traffic/safet¥/hwp/dwpolind.pdf so you can present us with a design that conforms to our policy requirements. Mr. Vivian Kamath July 7, 2006 Page 2 3. All traffic control signal equipment including underground conduit shall be shown on the plans. The following traffic signal notes shall also be included: a. The contractor shall be responsible for and shall replace all signal interconnect cable, detector cable, conduit and all underground accessory equipment damaged during construction. b. Prior to starting any work at this location, the contractor shall notify the New York State Department of Transportation that a tone-out of signal equipment is needed. c. All traffic signals shall be maintained in a traffic responsive operation and all interconnect, where existing, shall be maintained. The contractor shall pay a liquidated damages charge of $500.00 per calendar day if actuation and coordination is not maintained. A note shall be added to the plans requiring the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the Route 25 site frontage at the completion of construction. The plans appear to indicate on site runoff will enter the State highway ROW. Provisions shall be made to collect and contain all on site drainage. All proposed drainage features shall be submitted for our review along with the calculations supporting your proposal. 6. The plan must include the note "Repair existing shoulder, sidewalk and curbing as ordered by State Engineer." If applicable, a note shall be added to the plans stating "All sidewalk surfaces shall be given a slip resistant texture. A coarse broom finish perpendicular to the sidewalk slope is acceptable." 8. The ROW lines shall be clearly shown and called out on the plans. ROW markers shall be installed at the property limits along the State highway frontage and at any intermediary turning points along the State highway frontage in accordance with NYSDOT standard sheet M625-1R1. Please include the appropriate detail. 10. Any utility work proposed in State Highway right-of-way will require separate application and submission of plans (installation details, restoration details and Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan - all referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) to our Riverhead Maintenance facility. The applicant may contact Mr. Kevin Matthaei at (631) 727-1731 for further directions regarding Utility Highway Work Permit (HWP) applications. The applicant should be made aware that utility HWP issuance is subject to issuance of the HWP required for site work. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or I495, whichever is farther south, north to Long Island Sound. Mx. Vivian Kamath July 7, 2006 Page 3 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By Shaik A. $aad SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachment cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold Ms. Amy Ford, Senior Planner, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:SME Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 14978 63t-288-2480 63t-288-2544 Fax July12,2006 Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp. 640 Sunrise Highway 6West Babylon, NY 11704 Re: Traffic Engineering Assessment Proposed_Car Wash Addition N/e corner NYs Rte. 25 Mattituck, NY Dear Mr. Kamath: As requested, Du/m Engineering Associates PC has completed our professional traffic engineering evaluation in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the existing gasoline station, located on the northeast comer of Main Road (2qYS Route25) at Fac~0ry A.¥enne, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The project envisions the expansion of the existing convenience store and addition of a car wash to the gasoline station. Figure 1 shows the location of the proj eot site and Figure 2 shows the boundaries of the property and the adjacent roadway network. Our examination was performed to evaluate the potential traffic-impact of the proposed development, including trip generation, access, roadway capacity and safety. During the course of the study, the following specific work tasks were performed: 1. Several persortal visits to the site to attest to our observations of existing traffic movements at various times of the day and under different conditions. 2. Collection and analysis of existing traffic data as available fi:om the Town of Southold, New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. 3. Estimates ofthe additional traffic that will be generated by the proposad project. These estimates were based on information provided in the latest (7~) edition of the report Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Mr. Vivian g~math July 12, 2006 Page 4 4. Examination of the ability of the street network to accommodate the additional volurnes that will be generated by the proposed use. Intersection capacity analyses was performed at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue and Factory Avenue at the site access driveway for the following scenarios: a. 2007 No-Build Traffic b. 2007 Build Traffic 5. Examination of access to and from the site and the parking area from the standpoint oflocation and design. 6. Preparation of a letter report setting forth our findings and conclusions. The following sections present the results of our efforts in this regard. Existing Conditions As previously stated, the site is located on the northeast comer of NYS Route 25, Main Road, at FactoryAvenue, in Mattituek. The gas station is surrounded on three sides by a shopping center. At present, the site cont~in~ a gas station with eight fueling stations, and a small convenience store. The site has access to both NYS Route 25 and to Factory Avenue. There is one existing driveway on Factory Avenue and two on Main Road. In order to determine, the angount of traffic being generated by the existing use of the site, traffic counts were performed at the three existing site driveways during the weekday 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM peak periods, and during the Satarday Midday peak period. The results of these traffic counts are presented in Table 1. A, can be seen, the weekday AM peak hour occurs between 7:00 an 8:00 AM, when 28 vehicles entered the site and 30 vehicles lef~ the site, and the weekday PM peak hour occurred between 4:00 and 5:00 PM, when 32 vehicles entered the site and 33 le~ tho site. On Saturday, 53 vehicles entered the site and 46 vehicles lef~ the site during the peak hour, which occurred between 1:00 and 2:00 PM. Main Road is a New York State highway facility that provides direct access to the site. Although NYS Route 25 extends the entire length of Long Island, it serves as Main Street for many of the communities along the north fork of Long Island, including Mattituck. Near the site of the proposed development, Main Road provides one lane in each direction, flanked by shoulders, with additional turning lanes at major intersections. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Development along Main Road near the site is primarily commercial. According to information provided by New York State Department of Transportation, the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on Main Road in Mattituck in 2004 was 12849 vehicles per day. AADT is a transportation engineering and pla~nlng term defined as the average traffic volume at a given location on any day of the year, including weekends. Mr. Vivian Kamath July 12, 2006 Page 5 Existing Gas Station ITraffic 28 3O 38 34 53 46 Table 1 Site Generated Traffic Existing Gas Station with Convenience Store Future Site Trip Generation Thc current site plan for the proposed development envisions the expansion of the existing small convenience store, and the addition of a full service car wash to the site. The eight fueling stations will be retained. Information contained in the report "Trip Generation", 7u~ Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, was consulted to estimate the number of new trips expected to be generated by the proposed project. Under Land Use Code 948, Automated Car Wash, the ITE report presents data on trip making characteristics for a car wash. This information indicates that a car wash of the size proposed under this application might be expected to generate 18 new trips (9 entering and 9 exiting) during the weekday PM peak hour,-and 2-2- new trips (11 entering and 11 exiting) during the Saturday Midday peak hour. However, the information in the report is based on studies conducted at one or two car washes, and the user is cautioned in its use due to the small sample size. In addition, no information is provided as to trip generation at car washes du6_ng the weekday AM peak hour. The ITE report also provides data regarding trip making at gas stations with convenience stores and car washes, under Land Use Code 946, Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash. Based on this information, the site would generate 98 trips during the weekday AM peak hour, and 110 trips during the weekday PM peak hour. This represents an inerease of 40 new trips in the AM and 38 during the weekday PM. Once again, under this Land Use Code, no data is presented for the Saturday peak hour. Therefore, it has been assumed for thc purposes of this report that the new trips generated by the site during the Saturday middaypeak hour will be proportional to the increase in trips during the other peak hour analyzed for this report. This results in a total of 60 new trips, 32 entering and 28 exiting, which is considerably higher than the ITE report predicts that a new car wash would generate. It should be noted that not all the trafSc visiting the car wash would be new traffic added to the roadway network. Rather, it is likely that some portion of the traffic would ah'eady be on the roadway network for another purpose, and will visit the car wash as part of that multipurpose trip. However, for the purposes of this report, it has been assumed that all the traffic visiting the proposed car wash would be new traffic, thereby presenting a conservative worst-ease evaluation. This trip generation information is preseated in Table 2. Mr. Vivian Karaath July 12, 2006 Page 6 The site-generated traffic was then distributed on the new driveway configuration, and on the roadway network. It has been assumed that the new site generated U'a~fic will have origins and destinations similar to the traffic already visiting the site. Note that the existing gas station traffic was also redistributed on the roadway network to reflect the new driveway configuration. Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash 50 48 55 55 N/A N/A LUC 946 Less Existing Gas Station Traffic 28 30 38 34 53 46 Total New Site 22 18 17 21 32' 28 ~ Generated Traffic Assumed number of new trips. See text for explan~ti0n. Table 2 Site Generated Traffic Gas Station with Convenience Store and Car Wash Access Examination As stated, there arc currently three driveways serving thc site, two on Main Road and one on Factory Avenue. lu keeping with good access management practices, the site plan for the project proposes a single driveway on Main Road and a single driveway on Factory Avenue. The second, westernmost driveway on Main Road will be eliminated. The remaining driveway on Main Road will be eon_figured to allow for fight tums only into the site. Left and right tums into and out of the site wiU be permitted at the driveway on Factory Avenue. Note that, as requested by the T own, the applicant has attempted to obtain access to the parking lot of the adjaceat shopping center property. However, the owner of that property is unwilling to provide access at this time. The applicant remains willing to enter into a cross access agreement with the adjacent property owner. Mr. Vivian Kamath July 12, 2006 Page 7 Intersection Capacity Analyses In order to ensure that the proposed project will not have any detrimental impact on operating conditions on the roadway network, and to ensure that the site driveways will operate in a safe and efficient manner, without undue delay for vehicles entering and leaving the proposed development, signalized and unsignalized intersection capacity analyses have been performed. These capacity analyses were performed utilizing sottware based on the methodologies set forth in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, and utilized the traffic volumes described above, adjusted to reflect peak summer season, and the estimates of new vehicles expected to be generated by the proposed development, and also reflect the traffic generated by the new CVS drugstore on the southwest corner of Main Road at Factory Avenue. The results of these capacity analyses indicate that excellent levels of service can be expected to prevail at the driveway, and that no undue delays to vehicles traveling on Factory Avenue will occur. In addition, the new traffic generated by the project will have minimal impact on operating conditions at Ih~_intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue, and no deterioration in the levels of service at this intersection will occur during the three peak hours examined. Copies of the results of these intersection capacity analyses are attached. Conclusions I. Although the site will generate additional traffic, this traffic can be adequately accommodated by the existing roadway network. 2. Intersection capacity analyses performed in accordance with the methodology set forth in the 2000 edition of the Highway Opacity Manual indicate timt th~'additional traffic generated by the proposed development will have minimal impact on operations at the signalized intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue. 3. In keeping with good access management practices, the site plan for the preject proposes a singie driveway on Main Road and a single driveway on Factory Avenue. One existing driveway on Main Road will be closed. 4. The access driveways will operate in a safe and efficient manner, without causing undue delays. 5. The applicant remain~ willing to enter into a cross access arrangement with the adjacent shopping center property, at such time as the property owner would be w/fling to provide cress access. In light of the foregoing, and based on prefessiunal transportation engineering considerations, it is recommended that the proposed preject be approved. Mr. Vivian Kamath Suly 12, 2006 Page 8 If you have any questions or need any further information, please call me. Sincerely, Vincent Corrado Senior Engineer / Senior Transportation Planner VC:as L206230 P26069 Attachments FILE NAME: INTERSECTION: TIME PERIOD: DONE BY: ALT X CLEARS TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY EXISTING YEAR: HORIZON YEAR: APPROACH DEC, 2006 EXISTING 9 6 13 34 5 64 38 463 5 11 545 22 I , 33.00 :; :; ,; : ;;; ;t OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 1) CVS Ph~w 12 4 C 2 3 O 0 12 2 C C 3) O O a o o o o c o a o c 4) a o o o o o o c 8 o a c suB~z~ 12 4 0 2 3 0 0 13 5 2 0 ~,~?.,o I I I I I I I Add Car Wash 0 0 0 8 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 Analyst VC Agency or Co. DEA Date Performed 7-12-06 Time Pedod Wealcday AM Peak Hour Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year ProjectlD Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryA ve All other areas Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty 2007 No Build (SeasAdjust) Citgo EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT ",lumber of lanes, N~ I I 0 I I 0 0 I 1 0 1 1 _ene group L TR £ TR L T R L T R ffolume, V (vph) ,52 641 12 17 740 30 24 12 17 48 10 87 Yo Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 =eak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 ~.93 ~retJmed (P) or actuated (A) A P P P P P A A A A A A ~tar~-up lost time, ~ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 --xtension of e~fective green, e 3. 7 4.1 4.1 4. 1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 ~,rrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Jnit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 :iltering/metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 aitial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 ~ed / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 20 - .ane width 11.0 12.0 10.0 11.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 ~arkJng / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N ~arking maneuvers, Nm ~uses stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,tin. time for pedestrians. Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 t 3.2 'hasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 G= 6.8 Gm 36.9 G= G= G= 7.1 G= 5.6 G= G= 'iming Y= 5.7 Y= 6.1 Y= Y= Y= 5.9 Y= 5.9 Y= Y= )ur~,~,a!ion o?~__~alysis, T = 0.25 Cyel.~e_Length, C = 80.~ 0 EB WB NB SB ~:~: LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT ~djusted flow rate, v 56 702 18 828 39 15 63 72 ane group capacity, c 182 1173 323 871 158 139 188 166 /c ratio, X 0.31 0.60 0,06 0.95 0.25 O. 11 0.34 0.43 oral green ratio, g/C 0.11 0.64 0.49 0.49 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.11 Iniform delay, dI 33.0 8.3 10.8 19.6 33.6 33.2 32. 7 33.1 rogression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ,elay calibration, k 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 tcremantaJ delay, d2 1.0 2.3 0.3 20.6 0.8 0.3 I. 1 1.8 litial queue delay, d3 ontro[ delay 34.0 10.5 11.1 40.2 34.4 33.5 33.8 34.9 anegroup LOS C B B D C C C [ C pproach delay 12.3 39,6 34.2 34.4 pproach LOS B D C C ~tersection delay 27.5 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM DETAILED REPORT Analyst VC Agency or Co. DEA Date Performed 7-12-06 Time Period Weakday AM Peak Hour Main Rd & Intersection SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty Analysis Year 2007 Build (SeasAdjust) EB NB SB Lane group Volume, V (vph) % Heavy vehicles, %HV Peak-hour factor, PHF Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) Start-up lost time, I~ Extension of effective green, e Arrival type, AT Unit extension, UE Filtering/metering, I Initial unmet demand, Qb Pad / Bike / RTOR volumes Lane width Parking / Grade / Parking Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB Min. time for pedestrians, Timing Y= 5.7 Y= 6.1 Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 04 SB Only G= 7.1 Y= 5.9 Adjusted flow rate, v Lane group capacity, c v/c ratfo, X Total green ratio, g/C Uniform delay, d1 Progression factor, PF }elay calibration, k ncremental delay, d2 nitial queue delay, d3 ;eetrol delay _ane group LOS -~pp reach delay 12.5 ~,pproach LOS B ntersection delay 27.6 EB NB D C C SB Interaecflon LOS C FILE NAME: INTERSECTION: TIME PERIOD: DONE BY: ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY EXISTING YEAR: HORIZON YEAR: APPROACH 33.00 2.00 DTHER DEVELOPMENTS l) CVS Pharma~ BTOTAL HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT Area Type Main Rd & Analyst VC Intersection SigabeeRd/FactoryAve Agency or Co. DEA Ail other areas Date Pedormed 7/12/06 Jurisdiction Town of $outhold, SuffolkCoun~ Time Period Weekday PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2007 Build (SeasAdjust) Pro act ID Citgo EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT '~umber of lanes, Nt 1 I 0 I I 0 0 I I 0 I 1 _ane group L TR L TR L T R L T R 7olume, V (vph) 99 905 27 18 769 21 35 20 19 125 20 99 Yo Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 :~eak-hourfactor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 ! 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 ~retimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P P P P A A A A A A ~tart-up lost time, It 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ~xtension of effective green, e 3. 7 4.1 4.1 4. 1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 ~,rrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Jnit extension, UE 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 =iltering/metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 nitial unmat demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ~ed / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 20 - .anewidth 11.0 12.0 10.0 tl.5 10.0 ; 10.0 10.0 10.0 >arking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N )arking maneuvers, Nm ~uses stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /~ln. time for pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 ~hasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 G= 5.0 G= 37.9 G= G= G= 7.9 G= 5.6 G= G= 'iming Y= 5.7 Y= 6.1 Y= Y= Y= 5.9 Y= 5.9 Y-- y= )uration of Analysis, T = 0.28 ............. ~!~Length, C= 80.~0 LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT [djusted flow rate, v 113 1059 20 898 63 18 165 90 ~ne group capacity, c 143 1153 90 895 158 139 204 181 /c ratio, X 0.79 0.92 0.22 1.00 0.40 O. 13 0.81 0.50 'oral green ratio, g/C 0.08 0.63 0.50 0.50 0.09 0.09 0.12 O. 12 Iniform delay, d1 36,0 12.8 11.3 20.0 34.1 33.3 34.2 32.8 ~rogression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1,000 t. O00 )elay calibration, k 0.34 0.50 0.50 0.50 O, 11 O. 11 0.35 O. 11 lcremental delay, d2 25.2 13.0 5.6 30.9 1.7 0.4 21.0 2.1 litial queue delay, d3 :ont roi delay 61.1 25.8 16.9 50.9 35.8 33.7 55.2 34.9 ane group LOS E C B D D C E C .pproach delay 29.2 50.2 35.3 48.1 ,pproach LOS C D D D Itersection delay 39.3 Intersection LOS D Analyst VC Agency or Co. DEA Date Pedormed 7/12/06 Time Period Weekday PM Peak Hour HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FacforyAve All other areas Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty 2007 No Build (SeasAdjust) SB Number of lanes, N1 Lane group Volume, V (vph) % Heavy vehicles, %HV Peak-hour factor, PHF Prattled (P) or actuated (A) Start-up lost time, I~ Extension of effective green, e Arrival type, AT Unit extension, UE Filtering/metering, 1 nitial unmet demand, Qb Ped/ Bike / RTOR volumes _ane width ~arking / Grade / Parking ~arking maneuvers, Nm ~uses stopping, Ne Vlin. time for pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 ~hasing EB On,y EW Perm 03 04 SB Only -~ NB Only I 07 ~urat~f Analysis, T = 0.~ [~l~,?~.~ngth, C~ = 80.0 EB ~,djusted flow rate, v .ane group capacity, c ~/c ratio, X ~otal green ratio, g/C )niform delay, d1 )rogression factor, PF )elay calibration, k ncremental delay, d2 nitial queue delay, d3 ~ontrol delay .ane group LOS [pproach delay [pproach LOS 28.5 50.2 43.8 C D D D ~tersection delay 38.5 Intersection LOS FILE NAME: TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION: TIME PERIOD: EXISTING YEAR: HORIZON YEAR: DONE BY: APPROACH ALT X CLEARS DEC. 2006 EXISTING J 10 9 20 93 15 87 80 570 5 211 560 27 I 47.00 OTHER D~ELOPMENTS I I) CVS Pha~a~ 34 10 0 5 5 0, ( 23 10 4 0 0 ~) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 0 0 0 0 ~) 0 0 0 0 0 ( ~ 0~ 0 0 0 ~4) 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 0 ;OB~X~ 34, 10 0 5 5 C ~ 23 10 0 0 ~dd Car Wash 13 7 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT Analyst VC Agency or Co, DEA Date Performed 7-12.06 Time Period Saturday Midday Peak Hour Intersection Area 3'ype Jurisdiction Analysis Year Main Rd & $igsbeeRd/FactolyAve All other areas Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty 2007 No Build (SeasAdjust) EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N~ I I 0 1 1 0 0 I I 0 1 Lane group L TR L TR L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 120 878 17 36 839 41 49 23 30 145 27 131 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 4 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P P P P A A A A A A Star~-up Jost time, I~ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 Extension of effective green, e 3.7 4.1 4.1 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 L~nit extension, UE 3.0 30 3.0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, I 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1,000 1.000 nitial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pad / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 30 Lane width 11.0 12,0 10.0 11.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Jerking maneuvers, Nm ~uses stopping, Ne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vtin. time for pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 ~hasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 G= 9.3 G= 61.9 G= G= G= 17.1 G= 8.1 G= G= riming Y= 5.7 Y= 6.1 Y= Y= Y= 5.9 Y= 5.9 Y= y= ;)uratJon of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, © = 120.0 EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT ~,djusted flow rate, v 13.?, 996 40 978 80 29 191 112 .ane group capacity, c 157 1199 142 952 140 123 264 234 ~/c ratio, X 0.85 0,83 0.28 1,03 0.57 0.24 0.72 0,48 -oral green ratio, g/C 0.09 0.66 0.53 0.53 0,08 0.08 O. 16 O. 16 )niform delay, d1 53. 7 15.4 ! 15.4 28.0 52.9 51.4 48,0 46.0 )rogression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 )elay calibration, k 0.38 0.50 0.50 0,50 0.17 O. 11 0.28 0.11 3cremental delay, d2 32.8 6.7 4.9 36.3 5.5 1,0 9.4 1.5 !!rial queue delay, d3 :ontrol delay 86.4 22.2 20,3 64,3 58,5 52.4 57.4 47.5 ane group LOS F C C E E D E D pproach delay 29. 7 62. 6 56.9 53.8 pproach LOS C E E D Itersection delay 46.8 intersection LOS D Analyst VC Agency or Co. DEA Date Performed 7-12-06 Time Period Saturday Midday Peak Hour HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT .-- ........ : ......... t $igsbeeRd/FactoryA ve Ama Type All uther areas Jurisdiction Town of Southold. SuffolkCounty Anatysis Year 2007 Build ~$easAdjust) Proiect ID Citgo EB WB NB SB Number of lanes, N~ Lane group Volume, V (vph) % Heavy vehicles, %HV Peak-hour factor, PHF Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) Start-up lost time, 14 Extension of effective green, e Arrival type, AT Unit extension, UE Filterir~g/metering, I Inibel unmet demand, Qb Ped / Bike / RTOR voJumes Lane width Parking / Grade / Parking Parking maneuvers, Nm 5uses stopping, NB ~lin. time for Pedestrian.~ 3hasing ER Only G= 9.3 riming Y= 5.7 ;)uration 0.25 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 EW Perm 03 04 NB Only 07 08 G= 61.9 G= G= G= 17.1 G= 8,! G= G= Y= 6.1 Y= y= Y= 5.9 Y= 5.9 y= y= Cycle Length, C= 120.0 ~,djusted flow rate, v -ane group capacity, ,/c ratio, X -otaJ green ratio, g/C Jniform delay, d1 >rogression factor, PF )elay calibration, k 3cremental delay, d2 litial queue delay, d3 ~ontrol delay .ane group LOS ~pproach delay ~pproach LOS ~tereaction delay 62.6 C E 48.4 Intersection LOS D ~c ce_sS Page 1 of 1 Winser, Kristy From: Lanza, Heather Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:15 AM To: Winser, Kristy Subject: SEQR cost Warex/7-11 application Kristy, Please print this for the file. We will accept 50% of the SEQR fee we asked the applicant for 7-11 Mattituck to pay on their previous application's SEQR review (Warex). It came to light that there may have been some miscommunications during that review process due to all the staff turnover that led to a misunderstanding on the part of the applicant of what the costs of the SEQR review would be. I conveyed this information to Vivian Kamath by telephone on October 28, in answer to his request that they be allowed to pay only 50% of the remaining balance. He said that they will be sending in the 50% ($1,350) in the next few days along with the fee for the site plan application. Heather Lanza, AICP Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: heather.lanza~town.southold.ny.us 11/3/2008 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 6, 2008 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Vivian Kamath 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 RE: Warex Project- SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Municipal SEQR Review Dear Mr. Kamath: Enclosed is a copy of our Purchase Order #18394 for Municipal SEQRA review through February 20, 2008 in connection with your client's site plan before the Planning Board. Pursuant to 6NYCCR Part 617, State Environmental Quality Review, the Town may charge a fee to the applicant to recover the costs of SEQR reviews. Accordingly, you have made a partial payment of $1,500 towards the total amount of $4,235. Therefore please have your client send a check in the amount of $2,735 payable to the Town of Southold. Sincerely, Senior Planner Eric. cc: Heather Lanza, Planning Director Purchase Order # '1 394 Date i)WN OF SOUTHOLDO Tax Exempt # A163554 IDeliver and send billing to: Department P ( (~tt~(~ Address VENDOR **Return this copy and Town of Southold voucher itemized and signed for payment** ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UN IT COST TOTAL THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE DEPT. HEAD AND THE SUPERVISOR I CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE SUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE IN T~E?,.P P ROPF~TION C HARG ED D ep/~e~~ ~ I CERTIFY THIS TO BE A JUST AND UEPURCHA EORDER Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: 10/25/07 * * * RECEIPT * * * Receipt#: 1009 Transaction(s): 1 1 Application Fees Reference Subtotal 142-1-27 $1,500.00 Check#: 1009 Total Paid: $1,500.00 OCT 2 6 2007 Name: Gama, Properties Deer Park Inc Clerk ID: LYNDAB Internal ID: 142-1-27 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, NewYork I1971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries September 8, 2008 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Southold Town Planning Board Mrs. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: GA24A Deer Park, 1000-142-1-27 Inc (Mattituck 7-11) ........ Dear Chairpersons and Board members: The owner wishes to withdraw the previous application for accessory car wash and submit the enclosed application to construct addition to the existing building. This application will convert existing garage structure, accessory convenience store and three repair bays to the one retail use. The gas dispensing island and canopy will be removed. The existing uses on the property will be reduced to one retail use (7-11 convenience store). Enclosed please find an application for site plan and an application for variances required to expand existing building for the above referenced property. Please place this matter on the calender at the earliest possible date. w-~tricia C. Moore cc: GA/qA Deer Park, Inc. pLANNING BOARD MENIBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND pLANNING BOARD OFFICE ToWN OF sOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April 21,2008 Mr. Vivian Kamath 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 RE: Warex Project- SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Municipal SEQR Review Dear Mr. Kamath: Enclosed is a copy of our Purchase Order #18394 for Municipal SEQRA review through February 20, 2008 in connection with your client's site plan before the Planning Board. Pursuant to 6NYCCR Part 617, State Environmental Quality Review, the Town may charge a fee to the applicant to recover the costs of SEQR reviews. Accordingly, please have your client send a check in the amount of $4,235 payable to the Town of Southold. Sincerely, Heather Lanza, AICP Planning Director Eric. cc: Bruno Semon Purchase Order # ' 18394 J)WN OF SOUTHOLD~i Tax Exempt # A163554 Account # -~'~ o · q -~::)o -~,~o JDeliver and send billing to: Department Address ITEM JVendor ~ t t.~j (D~ J VENDOR **Return this copy and Town of Southold voucher itemized and signed for payment** QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE DEPT. HEAD AND THE SUPERVISOR I CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE SUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE IN IH~P~ARGED Dept. l-lead I CERTIFY THIS TO BE A JUST AND/~RUE PURCHA~;E ORDER t,vetson, t ope & voort is, LLC ~72 Walt Whitman Road Phone: 63~7-5655 Melville NY 11747 Fax: $31-4~'~-5620 Invoice operty: 07298 Project: arex Project, Mattituck Manager: Voorhis, Charles VA02518 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 State Rte 25 PO Box 1179 Southold NY 1 I971-0959 Attention: Heather Lanza Invoice #: 5732 Invoice Date: March 31, 2008 MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO NELSON POPE & VOORHIS Invoice Amount $4,235.00 Professional Services Bill ltours Bill Rate Charge Municipal SEQRA Review Work Performed thru 2/20/08 Administrative Assistant Environmental Planner Managing Partner Planner Municipal SEQR Review Municipal SEQR Review Municipal SEQR Review Municipal SEQR Review Municipal Total: Professional Services Totals 0.25 80.00 20.00 1.50 1 i0.00 165.00 I 1.75 200.00 2,350.00 20.00 85.00 1,700.00 33.50 $4,235.00 $4,235.00 *** Total Project Invoice Amount $4,235. O0 All invoices are due net 30 days. A late charge of 1% per month will be added to any unpaid balance after 30 days. Please make ali checks payable to NELSON POPE & VOORHIS Please include invoice number on check NELSON POPE & VOORHIS NOW ACCEPTS CREDIT CARDS VISA - MASTERCAR~ - AMERICAN EXPRES~ ~ ,'-'d L~d:, ~8 98~ 8~ 'sgO 9~JE ~g& ~'~ : ON X~ Ll~k~O:~ rjFIN,IIIUqd I'II'IOL ~1701~1i/~1S : IJOd~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 13,2008 Environmental Notice Bulletin 50 Wolf Road - Room 538 Albany, NY 12233-1750 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Warex Terminals Corporation State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) Determination Located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue, known as 9945 Main Road, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: General Business (B) To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find the following: ~ 3/11/08 Southold Town Planning Board resolution ~ SEQRA Positive Declaration ~ Nelson, Pope & Voorhis Environmental Planning Review dated 2/25/08 Kindly post this information. If you have any questions about this request, please call my office. Senior Site Plan Reviewer Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Ch~ir KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'raCE LOCATION: Town Hedl Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 11,2008 Mr. Vivian Kamath c/o DSC Construction Corporation 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, New York 11704 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Warex Terminals Corporation State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) Determination Located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue, known as 9945 Main Road, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: General Business (B) Dear Mr. Kamath: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 10, 2008: WHEREAS, this site plan is for the proposed alteration of an existing gas station which will include the removal of the existing 3-bay service station to expand the existing convenience store, expand the existing gas pump canopy and add a new car wash, where 1,146 sq. ft. is for the convenience store, 907 sq. ft. is for the car wash and approximately 3,434 sq. ft. is for the canopy including 12 parking spaces onsite, on a .55-acre parcel in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue, known as 9945 Main Road, in Mattituck, SCTM#1000-142-1-27; be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to 6NYCRR Part 617, of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes SEQR lead agency of this coordination process for this Unlisted Action and issues a Positive Declaration. Attached is the Positive Declaration for your review. Warex Terminals Corp. Pa.qe Two 3/11/08 If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, house Chairperson CC: Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Clerk, Town Board Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Engineer Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Water Authority NYSDEC, Commissioner, Albany New York State Department of Transportation NYSDEC, Regional Office, Stony Brook, NY SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI~ FEE, REGIONAL DIRECTOR March 3, 2008 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION REGION TEN 250 VETeRaNS MeMorIAL HIgHWaY Hauppauge, New YOrK 11788 www. nysdot.gov ASTR[D C. GLYNN COMMISSIONER Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp. 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Dear Mr. Kamath: Your November 19, 2007 Submission Proposed Site Plan for Warex Proiect 9945 Main Road Site Plans Revised 11/19/07 Route 25, Southold SCTM 1000-14200-0100-027000 Our Case No. 01-099P This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: The proposed site design does not appear to allow all the potential site users to access all services on site. If a customer were to access the fuel / convenience store facilities and then decide to access the car wash facility the customer would need to exit the site and use a public highway to do so. We recommend that a site design that permits site users to access all site facilities internally be considered. This proposed site design has the potential to degrade the mobility and operational safety of public facilities for the benefit of a private enterprise. The Town of Southold has recommended that the site owner dedicate property on the east side of the Factory Avenue / NY 25 intersection to the Town and improve the radius as part of the site improvements. We concur with the proposed disposition of the property dedication at this location and we support the Town's recommendation to improve the intersection radius as part of the site improvements. Please provide us with revised plans. Mr. Vivian Kamath March 3, 2008 Page 2 Please identify all features proposed within the NY 25 right-of-way (ROW) along this sites NY 25 frontage. Previously submitted plans showed landscape features such as trees, benches, fountains, etc. The subject site plan does not identify what exists and what is proposed within the NY 25 ROW. Please revise the plans accordingly. If any propose features are planned for this area please contact Mr. Brace Branigan of our Real Estate Group at 631-952-6092 to ascertain what requirements / permits may be necessary for the use and occupancy of the ROW. At the site access on Rt. 25, the pedestrians will have to zig zag from sidewalk to median and back to sidewalk. The design of the driveway island should be improved to allow for pedestrians to efficiently transverse the driveway. Please revise the plans to satisfactorily address this issue. 5. The driveway radius should conform to our policy standard of thirty-three (33) feet. Traffic control signage is required for the proposed driveway entrances to direct vehicles ingress and egress, along with a pavement marking plan displaying type of markings and its item number. Additional measures are needed to deter motorist traveling eastbound on Main Street from making lefts into the driveway. This may be done by pavement marking hatching extended to the edge line. On Sh SP-i: a. b. Increase line thickness for property line. Update note 8 to include survey markers 9. Add sidewalk, curb detail. 10. Please include the note: "All work shall be done in accordance with the NYS DOT Regional Traffic Detail Sheets and the NYSDOT Standard Sheets." 11. Please update the detail sheets on SP-3 to reflect the latest revised detail sheets. Detail M608-3R3 has been revised to sheets M608-10, 11 & 12. Sheet M608-5R2 has been revised to sheet M608-13. 12. Please supplement sheet M608-7R 1 with Regional Driveway Standard Sheet MS-2 13. Please see marked-up plans for additional comments. 14. Please provide a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan with applicable details and NYSDOT Standard Sheets. Mr. Vivian Kamath March 3, 2008 Page 3 15. Please provide a landscape plan with applicable details and NYSDOT Standards Sheets. 16. The addition of wire friendly street trees along NY 25 should be considered. 17. An "All Traffic" sign with a three o'clock arrow should be installed at the site driveway on Route 25. "No Left Turn" signs should be installed on Route 25. 18. Pedestrian countdown timers should be installed Please submit six (6) copies of revised plans for our review. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject Case Number and County Tax Map number. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, ORIGINAL Sl~ SHAIK A. S~AD, P.E. 7'-'~-~ Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachment cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold ~/Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:JMN LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Project Type: Site Plans Status: Withdrawn SCTM #: 1000- 142.-1-27 Project Name: Warex Project 06 Address: 9945 Main Road, Mattituck Hamlet: Mattituck Applicant Name: Warex Terminals Corp. Owner Name: WarexTerminals Corp. Zone 1: B Approval Date: End SP Date: Zone 2: Location: n/s/o OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information Zone 3: New York State Road 25, on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue known as 9945 Main Road in Mattituck SC Filin,q Date: C and R's · Home Assoc: R and M A.qreement: SCAN Date; SCANNED -------4~ ~l- ~ ¢': ~ 0 ;'?99 Reco__ rds Manngeme~,~ Semon, Bruno From: Sent: To: Subject: Lanza, Heather Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:11 AM Semon, Bruno; 'Carol' Warex SEQR documents Please see that the review and Part 2 EAF are faxed to Vivian this moming. I will give my copy to Carol to do so. I have Vivian's two fax numbers (he wants it sent to both) on a note attached to the documents. I don't have his last name. Thank you. Heather Lanza, A.I.C.P. Town Planning Director 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone: (631)765-1938 E-mail: heather.lanza~town.southold.ny.us P.O. Box 1179 54375 Route 25 - Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 To; Vivian Kamath, DSC Construction From: Corp. Heather Lanza/Carol F~c 661-0486/482-8110 Page~: 25 - including cover Phone: 804-9770 Date: 2/26/08 Re: Warex cc: urgent ~ Please Comment Please Reply As Requested Following, please find Part 2 - Environmental Planning Review Project Impacts and Their Magnitude, Discussion of the Importance of Impacts and EAF prepared by Nelson, Pope & Voorhis. A hard copy is in the mail. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQRA POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Town of Southold Planning Board Contact: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chair Address: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 FEB 25 Southold, New York 11971 Date: February 25, 2008 This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act - SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and Chapter 44 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) will be prepared. The Town seeks to conduct the scoping process in conformance with 6NYCRR Part 617.8, and requests the applicant to prepare and submit a Draft Scope. Title of Action: Self Car Wash and Convenience Store (and gasoline filling station) Warex Terminal Corp. SEQRStatus: Unlisted Action Description of Action: The proposed action involves the alteration of an existing gas station, which will include the removal of the existing 3-bay service station to expand the existing convenience store, expansion of the existing gas pump canopy and addition of a new car wash. The expansion involves a 146 square feet (SF) addition to the convenience store, 907 SF for the car wash and approximately 3,434 SF for the canopy. Location: The site address is: 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The overall project site is located at the northeast coruer of the intersection off Main Road (aka NYS Route 25) and Factory Avenue, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The site is an existing Citgo Gasoline Service Station. The parcel is zoned B (General Business) district and is 0.55 acres in size. SCTM No.: 1000-142-1-27 Determination of Significance Self Car Wash and Convenience Store (and Gasoline Filling Station); Warex Terminals Corp., Mattituck Reasons Supporting This Determination: The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCRR Part 617.7 (c). The following reasons are given in support of this determination of significance. The Planning Board has conducted a thorough review of the information submitted by the applicant with respect to the proposed project. · Part 1 - Long Environmental Assessment Form · Site plan (revised submittal: 10/30/07) Certified Survey · Construction Plans/elevations · Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated July 12, 2006 to Vivian Kamath (client representative) · Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated November 2, 2007 to Vivian Kamath (client representative) · Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated December 17, 2007 to Jeri Woodhouse, Planning Board Chair Members of the Planning Board have inspected the subject site and have deliberated on information supplied by the applicant, information supplied at public work sessions and the following additional information: · Mattituck Fire District letter of June 28, 2006 · NYS Department of Transportationletter of July 7, 2006 · Suffolk County Water Authority letter of Julyl 3, 2006 · Office of the Engineer, Town of Southold letter dated October 25, 2006 · Southold Transportation Commission letter dated July 6, 2007 · Office of the Engineer, Town of Southold letter dated December 3, 2007 · Southold Transportation Commission letter dated November 27, 2007 · Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC Consultant report to the Planning Board dated February 20, 2007, including Part 2 EAF and discussion of importance of impacts. One or more potential significant adverse impacts have been identified as described herein. The identification of such impacts warrants the preparation of a DEIS. A DEIS will permit the Planning Board to coordinate with involved agencies and examine mitigation measures and possible alternatives which may reduce potential significant adverse impacts. Water Resources Impacts - The project has water use considerations; car wash water reclamation is proposed; the project involves dispensing of gas using underground storage tanks. Grading, a neighboring retaining wall and the intervening fill and slopes between the north property line and the project site may result in erosion. Transportation System Impacts - There is potential traffic generation, flow and safety impacts to Factory Avenue and the Factory Avenue and State Route 25 (Main Road) intersection due to car wash access and gas/convenience store vehicle movements; the proximity of the project in relation to the shopping center to the north; the retail and storage uses to the west and the retail uses to the south of the proposed project complicate vehicle movements in this area. The parcel is located on the northeast comer of the Factory Avenue and State Route 25 intersection adjacent to the largest shopping center in the Hamlet of Mattituck. Tenants of the shopping center include a large grocery store (anchor), several restaurants and retail uses and the Town's only movie Page 2 Determination of Significance Self Car Wash and Convenience Store (and Gasoline Filling Station); Warex Terminals Corp., Mattituck theater. One of the ingress and egress points of this shopping center is located on Factory Avenue; this access offers the only traffic light controlled intersection available to users of the shopping center. The project proposes two ingress and one egress on Factory Avenue located between the shopping center access and the S.R 25/Factory Avenue intersection. Truck stacking along Factory Avenue is also a concern. In addition, there is a boat storage facility which involves trailer movements at a yard directly west of the proposed new car wash access. There are also concerns with respect to the Magic Fountain ice cream store located opposite the site at the northwest corner of Main Road and Factory Avenue due to high levels of seasonal activity, as well as routine activity at this location, particularly due to the uncontrolled curb cuts existing at Main Road and Factory Avenue for this use. 6. Noise and Odor Impacts - The project will introduce a new activity, specifically the car wash, near residential use and zoning and will remove screening vegetation. Public Safety Impacts - The project will add to intensification of site use and resultant congestion in an area subject to truck traffic and stacking, boat storage and hauling and activity at the Magic Fountain ice cream shop, in addition to traffic activity already associated with Factory Avenue, Main Road and the intersection. Pedestrian movement and safety due to this congestion and reported accidents should be examined. Community Character and Aesthetics - Route 25 is a scenic by-way; landscaping and building design should consider aesthetics. The site is in proximity to residential uses diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Additional car wash access is in proximity to residential zoning and use and will remove vegetation which may provide screening from commercial activities. As a result, the Planning Board finds that a Positive Declaration is appropriate and a DEIS must be prepared. For Further Information Contact: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone: (631) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Town of Southold, Supervisor's Office Town of Southold, Town Clerk Town of Southold, Planning Board Town of Southold, Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Suffolk County Water Authority NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation, Commissioner, Albany NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation, Regional Office, Stony Brook NYS Dept. of Transportation Applicant Parties of Interest Officially on Record with the Town Clerk (if applicable) Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING REVIEW PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE DISCUSSION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Warex Pgoject, 9945 Main Rd. Mattituck Prepared for: ~¢C~ 2r'3 ~'~ eparedby: Date: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT TYPE: LOCATION: SCTM: ZONING DISTRICT: OVERLAYS: TOTAL PROJECT AREA: Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 (631) 427-5665 Contact: Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP February25,2008 Warex Project, Mattituck Site Plan Application 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk 1000-142-1-27 B - General Business District NA 0.55 acres INTRODUCTION This document is a consultant report to assist the Planning Board and staff in the review of the above noted project. The site has been inspected by Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) and the submission materials noted herein have been evaluated. This report includes a summary of the site conditions and the proposed project, review of submitted materials, documentation of referrals, SEQRA Status, environmental and planning considerations, completion of a Part 2 EAF to examine project impacts and their magnitude, and a discussion of the importance of impacts to assist the Planning Board in evaluating the project and issuing a Determination of Significance under SEQRA. Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 SITE DESCRIPTION The overall project site is located at the intersection of: Main Road (aka State Route 25) and Factory Avenue, Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The 0.55-acre parcel is cun~ently improved with an existing gas station, which consists of: a gas canopy housing three pumps, a 3-bay service station and a convenience store. The site is zoned B - General Business District, as are the parcels in the immediate area surrounding the site and fronting Main Road. The adjacent zoning districts north and south of Main Road are residentially zoned, with the exception of a parcel in the MI - Marine zoning district to the southeast. The MI zoning district is situated at the end of James Creek; it serves as a marina for boats to access Peconic Bay, through James Creek. Bay Avenue Park is located on Bay Avenue, along James Creek, south of the MI zoning district, consisting of a Little League baseball field, two tennis courts, a parking area and a wetlands area along James Creek. REQUESTED ACTION The proposed action involves the alteration of an existing gas station, which will include the removal of the existing 3-bay service station to expand the existing convenience store, expansion of the existing gas pump canopy and addition ora new car wash. The expansion involves a 146 square feet (SF) addition to the convenience store, 907 SF for the car wash and approximately 3,434 SF for the canopy. The existing gas pump canopy currently has three (3) gas pumps and is proposed to be expanded for a total of four (4) gas pumps, requiring an area large enough to satisfy the twelve (12) car queuing requirement. The proposal will require curb cuts and site access alterations: the existing curb cut on Main Road, closest to the intersection of Main Road and Factory Ave is proposed to be removed, patched, and improved with landscaping, the second existing curb cut along Main Road is proposed to be altered to allow right turn in and right turn out only. Along Factory Avenue the curb cut closest to the intersection of Main Road and Factory Avenue is proposed to be removed, patched, and improved with landscaping. Farther north along Factory Avenue a curb cut is proposed to allow full movements for site ingress and egress. At the northwest comer of the property a third curb cut is proposed that will serve as the entrance into the queuing line for the proposed car wash. The car wash is proposed to have a "Zero Discharge Car Wash Water Reclamation System", which will require approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The perimeter of the property is to be improved with two benches along Main Road and landscaping as detailed in the site plan. SITE PLAN SUBMISSION AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION The Applicant has provided the following forms, which comply with the Town's Site Plan Application submission requirements: · Part 1 - Long Environmental Assessment Form · Site plan (revised submittal: 10/30/07) Page 2 Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 · Certified Survey · Construction Plans/elevations In addition, the applicant has retained a traffic engineer to provide consultation on site access and transportation impacts. The following letters were received and reviewed: · Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated July 12, 2006 to Vivian Kamath (client representative) This letter documents capacity analysis of the Factor Avenue/Main Road intersection finding that the project will have minimal impact on the intersection. The letter includes an access evaluation which notes that reduction of existing curb cuts is recommended and access will be adequate. The letter notes that cross access to the shopping center to the east was attempted, but not successful. The document does not address movement within the site, parking, queuing for site uses and the second site access for the car wash. · Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. letter dated November 2, 2007 to Vivian Kamath (client representative) This letter is a revision to the July 12, 2006 letter prepared to address turning radius on westbound Main Road to northbound Factory Avenue, and car wash queuing. The applicant has offered a dedication of land to improve the above noted turning radius. Car wash queuing was evaluated finding that stacking for 11 vehicles is provided and at 3 minutes per vehicle, 31 vehicles per your evaluation can be processed or stored on site. Given the car wash trip generation of 16 vehicles per hour, the study contends that queuing is adequate. The study does not address movements within the site, contingencies or the additional access on Factory Avenue for the car wash. · Dunn EngineeringAssociates, P.C. letter datedDecember 17, 2007 to Jeri Woodhouse, Planning Board Chair This letter responds to questions from the Planning Board meeting of December 3, 2007 regarding trip generation of the car wash by providing data to support the assertion that self-serve car washes generate less trips than full service car washes. The letter contends that the trip generation used in the analysis is conservative and results in a "worst-case" analysis. REFERRALS · Mattituck Fire District letter of June 28, 2006 This letter indicates that the existing fire hydrants in the area provide adequate water supply. The letter recommends that all roads and driveways meet Town clearance and fight-of-way requirements. · NYSDepartment of Transportation letter of July 7, 2006 The letter outlines the permit requirements for access to the State Highway and recommends only a fight mm ingress on Route 25 (Main Road). The letter also notes that the drainage design appears to contribute runoff to the State Highway, and should be revised to contain stormwater on the site. The most recent plan shows egress (right turn out) access to Route 25. · Suffolk County WaterAuthority letter of Julyl3, 2006 SCWA states that the project is not expected to impact the Laurel Lake Wellfield, but due to potential high water use, there may be extraordinary water tap requirements. · Office of the Engineer, Town of Southold letter dated October 25, 2006 The letter notes that the project requires a lot line change, permission of the adjoining owner, and recommends an evaluation of the impact the lot line change will have on the adjoining parking Page3 Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 lot. The Engineer comments that this is a major renovation which should meet current standards including location of underground storage tanks; existing and proposed tanks and appropriate SCDHS permits should be produced. The letter notes that NYSDOT curb cut approvals are necessary. Finally, drainage calculations are required. In closing, the letter notes that the traffic circulation on the 6/28/06 architect site plan is better than prior proposals. Southold Transportation Commission letter dated July 6, 2007 The Commission expressed concern over the width of the Factory Avenue access and the turnaround radius for the car wash. The letter also notes that Route 25 is a NYS Scenic Road and landscaping/design should ensure the project is aesthetically pleasing without adversely impacting sight distance at the intersection. Office of the Engineer, Town of Southold letter dated December 3, 2007 This letter updates comments for current site plans dated 10/30/07. 1) Drainage comments note the following: only new impervious surfaces are used to determine new drainage; concern over runoff to Factory Avenue; inlet sizes and numbering of leaching pools are needed; and, potential for determining new drainage based on the entire site; 2) The pavement, property line required setback of 4 feet, is reduced to 2 feet in the northwest and northeast parts of the site; 3) The proposed curb and pavement in the northwest part of the site will remove 2 large trees; is replacement being considered?; 4) The car wash entrance radius of 24' is tight and may create conflicts for vehicles accessing the car wash; 5) With respect to grading, proposed elevations north of the building and at the end of the turning radius are too high relative to the retaining wall on the adjoining property. Comments indicate that the existing retaining wall should not support additional fill; erosion control is of concern due to slopes; guard rails may be needed due to the steep drop and further engineering review is needed for grading; 6) NYSDOT approval is needed and the plan modified per DOT review; and 7) The dedication of 231 square feet at the intersection (Factory/Main) is noted, but NYSDOT input is requested to ensure that the dedicated area is sufficient to permit adequate radius and design changes. The Town Engineer also found the Dunn Engineering traffic assessment to be adequate. Southold Transportation Commission letter dated November 27, 2007 This updates the prior Commission letter with a recommendation for approval subject to scenic quality being addressed through landscaping and building design. It is noted that the applicant addressed the Town Engineer comments in a letter dated December 12, 2007 with 3 plan revisions: 1) Drainage calculations/design are changed to address all site generated nmoff and to prohibit excess runoff from entering Factory Avenue; 2) The 4 foot pavement to property line setback is now provided; and 3) Trees have been added to the plan to compensate for removal of large trees at the north property line. ZBA VARIANCES The proposed project requires three variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), specifically, a side yard setback variance for the building (15' where 25' is required), a front yard setback variance due to the canopy (8.33' where previous relief was given to 11.5') and an increase in size of the canopy above the 60 linear foot limit of frontage on one street to allow a 67' structure. The ZBA is also considering a Special Exception for the car wash use. Page4 Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 SEQRA STATUS The Planning Board conducted a coordinated review for lead agency commencing on September 11, 2007. The action was classified as an Unlisted Action, and the Planning Board assumed lead agency for SEQRA review of the project on October 15, 2007. A SEQRA Determination of Significance should be issued once the Planning Board determines that there is sufficient information to render a determination. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES There are no designated tidal or freshwater wetlands within approximately 1,500 feet of the property. The entire property is already developed with the gas station and parking lot. The underlying soil according to the Suffolk County Soil Survey (Warner, 1975) is identified as CuB - Cut and Fill, gently sloping. Any development constraints were mitigated during the original construction of the gas station, therefore no significant impact on soils and topography are anticipated. The site is an existing gasoline filling station with underground tanks for fuel storage. A review of the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) Distribution Maps from 2007 indicates that there are two water mains near the subject property: the first is located along Main Road and the second along Factory Avenue. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the USGS Water Resources Investigation Report 2000. The topographic elevation of the property is approximately 25 feet above msl, based on the USGS Topographic Quadrangle for the area. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 22 feet. The subject property is located south of the north fork groundwater divide. The direction of groundwater flow is expected to be horizontal and to the south towards James Creek and Peconic Bay. The site is in an area of archaeological sensitivity according to the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation maps, but has been subject to substantial disturbance as a result of prior development and therefore is not expected to yield cultural artifacts. No other significant natural resources were encountered as the site is current a developed gas station. Page 5 Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS The site is zoned B (General Business) and is surrounded by businesses fronting Route 25 in this area of the site. Diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest is R-40 zoning and residences fronting Factory Avenue. The site is an existing gas station with 3 repair bays and an office which sells some convenience items; 2 pump islands are located beneath an existing canopy. There are currently 2 curb cuts on Main Road and 1 curb cut on Factory Avenue; with the west Main Road curb cut and the Factory Avenue curb cut located close to the Main/Factory intersection. Vegetation north of the building provides some screening and green between the shopping center and service station; however, it is noted that most of the existing landscaping is sparse and not well maintained. The proposed project will remove the service bays, expand the convenience store, add a car wash to the back of the building and maintain the existing pump islands under a new enlarged canopy. There is an improvement to curb cuts on Route 25 by removing the west curb cut, and only allowing rights-in, rights-out for the east curb cut. Along Factory Avenue, a full ingress/egress of 30 feet in width is proposed farther north than the existing curb cut; however, a separate 15 foot car wash ingress is added. Factory Avenue is a heavily used connector road between CR 48 and Main Road. In addition, a boat storage facility which involves trailer transport movements is located directly opposite the new ingress for the car wash and near the relocated driveway access and trucks entering the shopping center to the north and east often "stack" along the east side of Factory Avenue before entering the shopping center. The proposed action requires three (3) dimensional variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals, as well as a Special Permit to permit a car wash use on the property. Other involved transportation approvals include the NYSDOT for curb cuts on State Route 25, and a curb cut modification on the Town controlled Factory Avenue. The SCDHS must approve tank storage and facilities for storage and handling of toxic and hazardous materials (Article 12) and must approve sanitary facilities under Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. There is significant concern with respect to intensification of the use of the site, particularly in view of its location at a busy intersection with various levels of vehicle movement caused by conditions and uses in proximity to the subject site. The Planning Board seeks a thorough review of potential impacts, available mitigation and alternatives in order to conduct site plan review and coordinate with other involved agencies. POTENTIAL IMPACTS A Part 2 Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) has been completed for the proposed action and is included as an Attachment. Several items were identified as potential impacts and are Page 6 Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 tentatively indicated as Small to Moderate Impact; however, further information may be needed to finalize this category and ensure that no adverse environmental impacts will occur. Further discussion is provided below: Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? The project has water use considerations; car wash water reclamation is propose& the project involves dispensing of gas using underground storage tanks. The Town Engineer requested information concerning SCDHS tank permits and identification of existing and proposed tanks on the site. No additional information was provided to NP&V. SCWA indicated that them may be extraordinary water tap requirements associated with this project. It is noted that the project will receive water from SCWA, and the Authority has indicated that water can be supplied to the site. Additional water tap requirements may depend upon the car wash facility, since the convenience store and gas station have relatively low water supply demand. The site is 0.55 acres in size and has an allowable flow of 330 GPD, with an expected design flow of 81 GPD indicating low water use and discharge. Reclamation of car wash water is proposed which will reduce water demand. SCDHS review is required under Article 6 for density, and Article 12 for tank storage. The gas station currently exists and must have tanks registered under Article 12. SCDHS applications should be filed for facilities on the site and for site plan approval of the sanitary systems and flow. SCWA should be contacted for water supply availability and approvals. Agency coordination will assist in assessing potential impacts. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? Grading, a neighboring retaining wall and the intervening fill and slopes between the north property line and the project site may result in erosion. Comments by the Town Engineer expressed concern with respect to grading and the transition to the neighboring property near the north property line. No additional information was provided to NP&V. The bottom of curb height of 24.63 feet, and the top of wall height of 21.92 feet indicates a vertical change of 2.71 feet over a 4 foot distance, or a slope of 68%. Potential erosion toward the neighboring property needs to be adequately addressed to the satisfaction of the Town Engineer. Grading, drainage and erosion control must be evaluated and mitigated. 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? Route 25 is a Designated New York State Scenic Byway; landscaping and building design should consider aesthetics. The site is in proximity to residential uses diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest. A rendering of the new building has been provided and the landscape plan reviewed. The architectural design appears to be a substantial improvement based on the new canopy design as compared to the existing canopy. The sloped roof and shingle treatment is an improvement over the current canopy. The building will remain much the same but will be architecturally enhanced. Site landscaping will be coordinated and much improved over current conditions. The plant materials include trees where space permits and will use deciduous as well as coniferous trees. Other areas will be enhanced with groundcover vegetation and flowering plants. The reduction of a curb cut on Route 25, and replacement with a right-in, right-out configuration that permits a landscape triangle will also be an improvement; however, an additional curb cut will he added to Factory Avenue. There are residential homes diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest. Trees on the north part of the site will be removed and will reduce aesthetics and screening with Page 7 Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 limited area for replanting of landscape vegetation. Installation of benches in a landscape setting along Route 25 is viewed as an improvement over existing conditions; however, the aesthetics of this site development with respect to the Route 25 scenic by-way is an important consideration for evaluation and appropriate mitigation. 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? There is potential impact to Factory Avenue and the State Route 25 intersection due to car wash access and gas/convenience store vehicle movements. In addition, there is a boat storage facility which involves trailer movements at a yard directly west of the proposed new car wash access. Truck stacking associated with the shopping center along Factory Avenue is also a concern. The area is also subject to seasonal traffic fluctuations which increase trip generation to the area and complicate traffic flow and interaction. Movement of traffic within the site, and on Factory Avenue and the State Route 25 intersection adjoining the site, is of concern. The turning radius for the car wash was identified as an issue by the Town Engineer. The end of the turn at the point where vehicles maneuver to enter the self- service car wash building opening seems problematic, particularly for larger SUV/van vehicles. If a vehicle cannot enter the building, the ensuing backup and logistics of correction of the situation could be very problematic. The separate self-service car wash entrance is understandable as not all patrons of the gas station will wash their cars. However, an additional curb cut for entrance and the need for those who do obtain gas or convenience items to exit, then re-enter the site is not optimum. There is potential traffic generation, flow and safety impacts to Factory Avenue and the Factory Avenue and State Route 25 (Main Road) intersection due to car wash access and gas/convenience store vehicle movements; the proximity of the project in relation to the shopping center to the north; the retail and storage uses to the west and the retail uses to the south of the proposed project complicate vehicle movements in this area. The parcel is located on the northeast comer of the Factory Avenue and State Route 25 intersection adjacent to the largest shopping center in the Hamlet of Mattituck. Tenants of the shopping center include a large grocery store (anchor), several restaurants and retail uses and the Town's only movie theater. One of the ingress and egress points of this shopping center is located on Factory Avenue; this access offers the only traffic light controlled intersection available to users of the shopping center. The project proposes two ingress and one egress on Factory Avenue located between the shopping center access and the S.R 25/Factory Avenue intersection. There is a situation where tracks stack along the east side of Factory Avenue to access the shopping center driveway to the north of the subject site. In addition, there is a boat storage facility which involves trailer movements at a yard directly west of the proposed new car wash access. There are also concerns with respect to the Magic Fountain ice cream store located opposite the site at the northwest comer of Main Road and Factory Avenue due to high levels of seasonal activity, as well as routine activity at this location, particularly due to the uncontrolled curb cuts existing at Main Road and Factory Avenue for this use. The area is also subject to seasonal traffic fluctuations which increase trip generation to the area and complicate traffic flow and interaction. These concerns, together with potential stacking issues due to the fight radius noted above, and vehicle movements do warrant further evaluation. In addition, Planning staff indicates that personal communication with the police department indicates that 61 accidents were recorded at Page 8 Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 the Factory/Main Road intersection in the past five years. As a result, car wash turning radius, vehicle stacking and movements within the site and toward the new car wash entrance warrant further evaluation and mitigation to the satisfaction of the Planning Board. 17. Will &ere be objectionable odors, noise or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? The project will introduce a new activity, specifically the car wash, near residential use and zoning and will remove screening vegetation. The proposed action will result in a new activity in the north part of the site, not far from existing residential zoning (R-40) and an existing residence diagonally across Factory Avenue from the northwest comer of the site. It is noted that residences along Factory Avenue in this area, are situated near Factory Avenue, and across from a parking lot for a commercial center which also has an access farther north on Factory Avenue. In addition, the southernmost residence adjoins a boat storage facility. As a result, the dominant source of noise is expected to be Factory Avenue, with other levels of activity present along this segment of road. The relative impact of adding a curb cut in an active area, removal of existing trees that provide screening and and possible attenuation with limited area for reinstallation of landscaping is a noted impact. The hours of operation and noise/odors associated with the facility warrant further evaluation. 18. V~ill Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Safety related to pedestrian movements in the vicinity of the site due to traffic congestion and intensification of site use. The project will add to intensification of site use and resultant congestion in an area subject to truck traffic and stacking, boat storage and hauling and activity at the Magic Fountain ice cream shop, in addition to traffic activity already associated with Factory Avenue, Main Road and the intersection. Pedestrian movement and safety due to this congestion and reported accidents should be examined. 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Additional car wash access is in proximity to residential zoning and use and will remove vegetation which may provide screening from commercial activities. The project site is zoned B (General Business) and the site is currently occupied by a gas station and 3 service bays. The proposed project will result in certain aesthetic improvements to the site including architecture of the canopy and a coordinated landscape plan. The convenience store will result in some increase in use intensity but the facility currently does provide some convenience goods to patrons. The site plan provides parking for the convenience store and queuing for the gas station, a dumpster location (which is improved over current conditions), as well as improved access and reduction in curb cuts on Route 25. The gas station and convenience store do not represent a concern. The car wash is a self-service type that does involve less activity than a full car wash; however, concern over queuing, turning radius and potential impact on Factory Avenue expressed above remain a concern that should be addressed. The overall intensification of the site use is of concern. The combination of a car wash, gas station and convenience store, on a small site in proximity to an active intersection with other vehicle and truck movements will exacerbate the current level of congestion and activity. The proximity to residences and intensification of site use including the removal of trees and added car wash activity, coupled with the additional curb cut on Factory Avenue is expected to change the character of the community. Page 9 Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION This document addresses information available to date and offers consideration of potential impacts of the project in the context of the State Enviromnental Quality Review Act. The Part 1 EAF was reviewed and a Part 2 EAF has been completed and attached. Further evaluation of the issues identified in the Part 2 EAF indicate that potential impacts are potentially large. The Planning Board feels that additional information is warranted in order to evaluate impacts, mitigation and alternatives, and the Board also finds that coordination with other involved agencies through SEQRA would be beneficial for project review. These issues are summarized as follows: Water Resources The project has water use considerations; car wash water reclamation is proposed; the project involves dispensing of gas using underground storage tanks. Grading, a neighboring retaining wall and the intervening fill and slopes between the north property line and the project site may result in erosion. Transportation and Safety There is potential impact to Factory Avenue and the intersection of State Route 25 due to car wash access and gas/convenience store vehicle movements. In addition, there is a boat storage facility which involves trailer movements at a yard directly west of the proposed new car wash access. The Magic Fountain ice cream store located across Factory Avenue, opposite the site, is cause for concem due to high levels of seasonal activity, and particularly due to the uncontrolled curb cuts existing at Main Road and Factory Avenue for this use. Track stacking along Factory Avenue is also a concern, as is the seasonal increase in traffic. Safety related to pedestrian movements in the vicinity of the site due to traffic congestion and intensification of site use is also an issue. Noise and Odors The project will introduce a new activity, specifically the car wash, near residential use and zoning and will remove existing screening vegetation. Community Character and Aesthetics Route 25 is a Designated New York State Scenic Byway; landscaping and building design should consider aesthetics. The site is in proximity to residential uses diagonally across Factory Avenue to the northwest. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Additional car wash access is in proximity to residential zoning and use and will remove vegetation which may provide screening from commercial activities. If during the course of review the Planning Board identifies one or more potential significant adverse impacts, then a Positive Declaration is required and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement must be prepared. The review contained herein has identified a number of potential significant adverse impacts and as a result, the preparation of a DEIS is appropriate. A DEIS will also allow the Planning Board to more thoroughly evaluate necessary mitigation measures and possible alternatives to the proposed action that may reduce anticipated impacts. Page 10 Warex, Mattituck Environmental Planning Review NP&V No. 07298 ATTACHMENT A PART 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Page 11 Warex Project, 9945 Main Road, Matfituck NP&V//07298 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAi~NITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question; Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would tdgger a response in column 2. The examples ars generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, foranyspeciflcpreject orsite otherexamples andlcrlawerthresholds may be appropriate fora Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each questinn. In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read corefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it ia also necessarily significant Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. [ If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be miggated by change(s) iR the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. ~-. -- '~ 1 2 3 Smallto Potential Canlmpact Be .... 08 / Moderate Large Mitigated by FEB 5 zu impact Impact PrejactChange 1 Impact on Land _~ 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO [] YES [] Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 fuot rise per 100 foot cf length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Construction of pave¢~ parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. [] [] r Yes E No [] [] DY" nNo [] [] [] Yes E No Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing 9round surfaco. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or Involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining pu~3oces that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural matsdal (i.e., reck or soil) per year. [] [] r Yes r' No [] [] nY,, r"l.o [] [] []Yes []No Page 11 of 21 1 Small to Moderate Impact Wnrex Projeet, 9945 Main Road, Matfiruck NP&V #07298 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change Construction or expansion cfa santary landfill. [] Construction in a designated floodway. [] Other impacts: [] [] r'-lyco [].o [] []yco r-l.o Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) i;1.o F-lYES Specific land forms: [] Impact on Water [] C3Y~ I'"l.c 3. Will Proposed Action alfect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ~'~No []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: 4, Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? [].o r"]'~s Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the aurlsce area of any body of water or mom than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: [] r"t~sa I-I.o I Page 12of21 Warex Project, 9945 Main Road, Mail,tuck NP&V #07298 I g 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quanr~?NO [~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Propcaed Action will requira a disuharga permit. [] [] F'~ Yes ['"'~ No Propcesd Action requires use of a aourco of water that does not [] [] []Yes r~No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater [] [] CYea [-"]No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination cfa water [] [] [] Yes [] No supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. [] [] [] Yes [] No Liquid effluent will be convoyed off the site to facilities which [] [] DYes r']No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.g00 gallons [] [] [] Yes [] No par day. Proposed Action will ,ike,y cause siltation or other discharge into [] [] []Yes r"~ No an existing body cf water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the ctorage of petroleum or [] [] []Yes [].o chemical preducta ~raater then 1,'100 §aliens. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without [] [] [] Yes [] No water and/or sewer services, Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses [] [] [] Yes [] No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: [] [] r-'~Yes [] NO IWater use considorslJocs; car wash water reclamation existing and proposed tank storage; project site involves dispensing ] of gas using underground storage tanks. Page 13 of 21 1 Small te Moderate Impact Warex Project, 9945 Main Road, Mattit~ck NP&V #07298 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or sun%ce water Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. [] Proposed Action will allow development in a designated [] floodway. Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No [] []Yes r--l.o [] r'-IY-- I--1"o [] []Yea [].c [] []Ye. [].o Grading, retaining wall and slope between north property line and property to north may result in erosion IMPACT ON AIR Will Proposed Action affect air quality? [].o I-'lYEs Examples that would apply to column 2 Propcsed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Proposed A~tion will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of reMse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will altow an increase in the density cf industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: [] [] []--lYes [].o [] [] []Yes [].o [] [] []Yes F-~No [] [] []Y. [].o Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? .~mroplaa that would apply to ~ctumn 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, ever or near the site, or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife h abitaL Application of pesticide or herbicide mom than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts; 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? [].o r-lyEs Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, she[lfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. 1 Small to Moderate Impact Warex Project, 9945 Main Road, Mnt~tuck NP&V #07298 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change [] []vss r"l.o [] Elves Other impacts; IMPACT ON AGRIC:-UL'II. JRAL LAND RESOURCES Examples that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hay§elds, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil pm~i[e of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irrevemibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or. if located in an AgricuJtural District, mora than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. []Yes F"~ No DTM E]No E]Yes J'~.o F-'] Yes I'"~ N o Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: Warex Project, 9945 Main Road, Ma~tack NP&V #07298 1 2 3' SmaJ~ to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON AES~'IETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action alfect aesthetic resources? (If neceusary, use the Visual FAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visibts to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. [] [] DYes [].o Project components that will result in the elimination or signiflcent screening of scenic views known to be important to the area, Other impacts: [] [] [] Yes [] No Route 25 is a scenic road; landscaping and building dusign should consider aesthetics; site is in proximity to residential use I diagonally across Factoo' Avenue to ~c northeast. IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site inventory. [] [] E] se [] [] D es I-l.o Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: 1 Small to Moclerate Impact Warex Project, 9945 Main Road, Mnttituck NP&V #07298 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or ~ufore open spaces cr recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 The peffnanent foreclosure of a fufore recreational opportunity. A major reduction cf an open space important to the community. Other impacts: tiV~ACT ON CRmCAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS [] []Yea [].o [] []Y. 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? [].o []~Es List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation the CEA, Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within Ihe CEA? Proposed Action wiJl result Jn a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will resuJt in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the Other impacts: [] []~. I'-I.o [] I-I~se 1'%o I Page 17 of 21 IMPAOT ON TRAN~PORTA'RON Warex project, 9945 Main Rond, Matt[tuck NP&V g07298 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impsot Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? [] NO [] YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Altereticn of present patterns of movement of people and/or [] [] []Yes []No goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. [] [] [] Yes [] No Oth.r~mpacts: [] FI ~Y. [].e IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? rq.o []Y~S Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed ^etlon will couse a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or lo serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT [] [] ~Yes []"o [] [] []Yes E]No 17. Will there be objecticnable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Pmposed Act[on? []NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating no]se exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. [] [] [] [] [] r']yes [].O [] DYes I-I.o [] DY- r-I.o [] r'1¥.~ •.o Proposed Action will remove natural bardere that would act as a Other impacts: [] [] []yes r'l.o JProject will introduce a new activity (car wash) near residential use and zoning and will remove screening vegetation. Page 18 of 21 Warex Projec~ 9945 Main Road, Mat~tuck NP&V #07298 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will ~>ed Acti~]a~t public health and safety? Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or ralease of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident o r upset conditions, or there may be a chronic iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) [] [] C]~es C.o [] [] []Yes []NO [] [] CY-- r-l.o Storage ~acilltles for one million or more gallons of liquefied naturaJ gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the dispceal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No Safety related to pedestrian reovements in the vicinity of thc site due to traffic congestion and intensification of site use. IMPACT ON GROWI~-I AND CHARACl'~R OF COMMUNITY OR NE~;~IBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? I--1.O []YES Examples that wouk:i apply to column 2 The psn'~anent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for cepital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of histedc importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc. J [] [] DYes ~.o [] [] []Yes r--lNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I--1y. [].o Page lg of 21 Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Wnrex Project, 9945 Main Road, Mn~tuck NP&V #07298 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Other impacts: [] [] []Yes ['--]No i Additional car wash access in proximity to residential zoning and use; and will remove existing vegetation which may provide screening from commercial activities. , 20. Is Ihere, or is there likely lo be, public controversy related to potential adveme environment Impacts? If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B~ WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L, EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOVfNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: ~/~ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N-Y 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: James Richter, Town Engineer ~/..~ Heather Lanza, Town Planning Director December 27, 2007 GAMA Properties (Warex Terminals Corp.) SCTM#1000-142.1-27 Please review the attached correspondence from Eugene Kempey, P.E. and advise me as to whether the comments in your report to the Planning Board, dated December 3, 2007, have been satisfied. Thank you. Att. Eugene G. Kempey, P. E. 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New York 11704 T. 631-321-7777 F. 631-661-0486 December 12, 2007 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Planning Board Town Hall. 53095 Main Road. Southold, New York 11971 ATTN: Mrs. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse GAMA Properties / Warex Terminals 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-141-01-27 Zoning District: B Dear Mrs. Woodhouse, As per the Town Engineers letter on the abb'{/~ ~eferenced project dated December 3, 2007, the following are responses to the comments. The drainage calculations that have been provided on SP-Zbl indicate an increase in hardened surfaces because as per the proposed site plan the existing landscaped area in the North of the property will be used for a driveway to enter the carwash tunnel, thus eliminating much of the landscape in the North of the property. As per the drainage calculations Existing and proposed square footages for landscape asphalt and building/canopy have been shown. The existing pools size and depth will be shown. For the runoff from the Car Wash tunnel we will install a catch basin that will tie into an existing drywell to prohibit any excess runoff from entering into Factory Avenue. We have altered the Site Plan to show a four foot minimum of landscaping between the Easterly and Westerly parking areas as per Section 280-95. We have taken this into consideration and we are proposing to add in several trees throughout the site to compensate for the removal of the existing trees located along the Northwesterly Property line. Eugene G. Kempey, P. E. 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New York 11704 T. 631-321-7777 F. 631-661-0486 The proposed pavement radius at the entrance of the Car Wash has been taken into consideration and with consultation from Dunn Engineering who are our Traffic Consultants, have found this radius to be satisfactory. There will be a separate retaining wall that xvill be installed at this location to provide fbr the grade change. Guard rails will be installed at this location. Details will be provided with the revised Site Plans. 6. We have made a submission to the NYSDOT and are awaiting comments. The area of dedication is flexible and we are agreeable to reconfigure this parcel according to NYSDOT's comments and suggestions. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please advise. _,SincerelyF,, Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Weathampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 631-288-2480 631-288-2544 Fax November 2, 2007 Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp. 640 Sunrise Highway 6West Babylon, NY 11704 Dear Mr. Kamath: NOV - 7 2007 $outhold Town Piannin~ Board Re: Traffic Engineering Assessment Proposed Car Wash Addition N/e comer NYS Rte. 25 Mattituck, NY As requested, Dunn Engineering Associates PC has completed our professional traffic engineering evaluation in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the existing gasoline station, located on the northeast comer of Main Road (NYS Route25) at Factory Avenue, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The project envisions the expansion of the existing convenience store and addition of an automatic car wash to the gasoline station. Figure 1 shows the location of the project site and Figure 2 shows the boundaries of the property and the adjacent roadway network. Our examination was performed to evaluate the potential traffic impact of the proposed development, including trip generation, access, roadway capacity and safety. During the course of the study, the following specific work tasks were performed: 1. Several personal visits to the site to attest to our observations of existing traffic movements at various times of the day and under different conditions. 2. Collection and analysis of existing traffic data as available from the Town of Southold, New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. 3. Estimates ofthe additional traffic that will be generated by the proposed project. These estimates were based on information provided in the latest (7th) edition of the report Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. FIGURE 1 AREA MAP I~ DUNN ENGINEE1RJNG ASSOCIATES, P.C. FIGURE 2 SITE MAP DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C. Consalting Engineers 66 Main Stneet Westh~mpton BeaCh, NY 11978 (631 } 288-2480 Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 4 Examination of the ability of the street network to accommodate the additional volumes that will be generated by the. proposed use. Intersection capacity analyses was performed at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue and Factory Avenue at the site access driveway for the following scenarios: a. 2008 No-Build Traffic b. 2008 Build Traffic 5. Examination of access to and from the site and the parking area from the standpoint of location and design. 6. Evaluation of the geometric features of the proposed queue storage area. 7. Preparation ora letter report setting forth our findings and conclusions. The following sections present the results of our efforts in this regard. Existing Conditions As previously stated, the site is located on the northeast comer of lx~S Route 25, Main Road, at Factory Avenue, in Mattituck. The gas station is surrounded on two sides by a shopping center. At present, the site contains a gas station with eight fueling stations, two service bays that are currently unused, and a small convenience store. The site has access to both NYS Route 25 and to Factory Avenue. There is one existing driveway on Factory Avenue and two on Main Road. In order to determine the amount of traffic being generated by the existing use of the site, traffic counts were performed at the three existing site driveways during the weekday 7:00 to 9:00 A/Vi and 4:00 to 6:00 PM peak periods, and during the Saturday Midday peak period. The results of these traffic counts are presented in Table 1. As can be seen, the weekday AM peak hour occurs between 7:00 an 8:00 AM, when 28 vehicles entered the site and 30 vehicles left the site, and the weekday PM peak hour occurred between 4:00 and 5:00 PM, when 32 vehicles entered the site and 33 left the site. On Saturday, 53 vehicles entered the site and 46 vehicles left the site during the peak hour, which occurred between 1:00 and 2:00 PM. Existing Gas Station Traffic 28 30 38 34 53 46 Table 1 Site Generated Traffic Existing Gas Station with Convenience Store Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 5 Main Road is a New York State highway facility that provides direct access to the site. Although NYS Route 25 extends the entire length of Long Island, it serves as Main Street for many of the communities along the north fork of Long Island, including Mattituck. Near the site of the proposed development, Main Road provides one lane in each direction, flanked by shoulders, with additional turning lanes at major intersections. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Development along Main Road near the site is primarily commercial. According to information provided by New York State Department of Transportation, the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on Main Road in Mattituck in 2004 was 12849 vehicles per day. Note that AADT is a transportation engineering and planning term defined as the average traffic volume at a given location on any day of the year, including weekends, and is not utilized in detailed analyses. The intersection of NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue is controlled by a traffic signal that is maintained by NYSDOT. This signal also controls the northbound approach of Sigsbee Avenue, which is off-set to the west from Factory Avenue. Factory Avenue forms an acute angle with Maine Road, as it is skewed to the northeast. The very tight turning radius presents difficulties for vehicles turning from westbound Main Road onto northbound Factory Avenue, particularly trucks. Future Site Trip Generation The current site plan for the proposed development envisions the expansion of the existing small convenience store, and the addition of an automated car wash to the site. The eight fueling stations will be retained, and the service bays will be removed. Information contained in the report "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, was consulted to estimate the number of new trips expected to be generated by the proposed project. Under Land Use Code 948, Automated Car Wash, the ITE report presents data on trip making characteristics for a stand-alone car wash. Automated car washes are defined in the ITE report as "facilities that allow for the mechanical cleaning of the exterior of vehicles". Although, some of the sites in the ITE report provided auto detailing and other related services, only exterior cleaning is proposed at the site. No vacuuming or interior cleaning services are to be provided. The information in the report indicates that a car wash of the size proposed under this application might be expected to generate 18 new trips (9 entering and 9 exiting) during the weekday PM peak hour, and 22 new trips (11 entering and 11 exiting) during the Saturday Midday peak hour. However, the information in the report is based on studies conducted at one or two car washes, and the user is cautioned in its use due to the small sample size. In addition, no information is provided as to trip generation at car washes during the weekday AM peak hour. The ITE report also provides data regarding trip making at gas stations with convenience stores and car washes, nnder Land Use Code 946, Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash. Once again, under this Land Use Code, no data is presented for the Saturday peak hour. Therefore, it has been estimated for the purposes of this report that the new trips generated by the site during the Saturday midday peak hour will be proportional to the increase in trips during the other peak hour analyzed for this report. Based on this information, all the combined future uses on the Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 6 site would generate a total of 98 trips during the weekday AM peak hour, and 110 trips during the weekday PM peak hour. ~This represents an increase of 40 new trips in the AM and 38 during the weekday PM above the existing traffic. On Saturday, this methodology results in a total of 60 new trips, 32 entering and 28 exiting, which is considerably higher than the ITE report predicts that a ne~v standalone automated car wash would generate, and is in fact greater than a new full service car wash would generate. It must be noted that information provided by the applicant regarding automated car washes indicted that the number of washes at automated car washes is between 25 and 50% of full service car washes. Therefore, use of this methodology results in an extremely conservative estimate of the traffic expected to be generated by the site. It should also be noted that not all the traffic visiting the car wash would be new traffic added to the roadway network. Rather, it is likely that some portion of the traffic would already be on the roadway network for another purpose, and will visit the car wash as part of that multipurpose trip. However, for the purposes of this report, it has been assumed that all the traffic visiting the proposed car wash would be new traffic, thereby supporting a conservative worst-case evaluation. This trip generation information is presented in Table 2. The site-generated traffic was then distributed on the new driveway configuration, and on the roadway network. It has been assumed that the new site generated traffic will have origins and destinations similar to the traffic already visiting the site. Note that the existing gas station traffic was also redistributed on the roadway network to reflect the new driveway configuration. Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash 50 48 55 55 N/A N/A LUC 946 Less Existing Gas Station Traffic 28 30 38 34 53 46 Total New Site Generated Traffic 22 18 17 21 32* 28* lsume, hum of new trips. See text for explanation. Table 2 Site Generated Traffic Gas Station with Convenience Store and Car Wash Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 7 Access Examination As stated, there are currei~tly three driveways serving the site, two on Main Road and one on Factory Avenue. The westerly driveway on Main Road is located less than 25 feet east of Factory Avenue. The driveway on Factory Avenue is located less than 50 feet north of Main Road and less than 20 feet north of the stop line for southbound traffic at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue. In keeping with good access management practices and in conformance with NYSDOT's policy regarding driveways on State highways, the westernmost driveway on Main Road will he eliminated. The remaining driveway on Main Road will be configured to allow for right tums only into and out of the site. Left and right turns into and out of the site will be permitted at the driveway on Factory Avenue. Note also that car wash patrons will have access only to Factory Avenue and no internal access to the car wash will be possible fi.om the fueling area. While this driveway configuration is not considered ideal, the access design reflects the desire on the part of the Town of Southold that no access to the car wash be provided from the State highway due to concerns regarding potential queues on Main Road. Due to the low volume of traffic expected to be generated by the car wash, such queues are considered unlikely; however, the access configuration shown on the site is considered more desirable by the Town. Patrons leaving the fueling area will be directed by on-site signing to access the car wash by turning onto Factory Avenue fi.om Main Road. Finally, note that, as requested by the Town, the applicant has attempted to obtain access to the parking lot of the adjacent shopping center property. However, the owner of that property is unwilling to provide access at this time. The applicant remains willing to enter into a cross access agreement with the adjacent property owner. Intersection Capacity Analyses In order to ensure that the proposed project will not have any detrimental impact on operating conditions on the roadway network, and to ensure that the site driveways will operate in a safe and e.fficient manner, without undue delay for vehicles entering and leaving the proposed development, signalized and unsignalized intersection capacity analyses have been performed. These capacity analyses were performed utilizing software based on the methodologies set forth in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, and utilized the traffic volumes described above, adjusted to reflect peak summer season, and the estimates of new vehicles expected to be generated by the proposed development, and also reflect the traffic generated by the new CVS drugstore on the southwest comer of Main Road at Factory Avenue. The results of these capacity analyses indicate that excellent levels of service can be expected to prevail at the driveway, and that no undue delays to vehicles traveling on Factory Avenue will occur. In addition, the low volumes new traffic generated by the project will have minimal impact on operating conditions at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue, and no deterioration in the levels of service at this intersection will occur during the three peak hours examined. During the weekday AM peak, the intersection will function at LOS C, and no deterioration in LOS is predicted due to the proposed project. Similarly, Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 8 during the weekday PM and Saturday peak, LOS D is predicted and again no changes occur due to the proposed project. Ngte that these capacity analyses have been prepared using the extremely conservative worst case projections for site generated traffic for the proposed site. Copies of the results of these intersection capacity analyses are attached. Turning Radius Improvement As previously stated, the turning radius for westbound Main Road to northbound Factory Avenue is limited due to the alignment of Factory Avenue. Vehicles have been observed experiencing difficulty in executing this movement, especially when southbound left turning vehicles are queued at the stop line on Factory Avenue. It is highly recommended that this existing turning radius deficiency be improved. In order to assist the Town of Southold and/or NYSDOT in improving this existing deficiency, the applicant is willing to dedicate property on the northeast comer of the site so that a larger turning radius can be installed. The approximate area of this dedication is shown on the site plan. Car Wash Queue The site plan shows queuing storage for eleven vehicles on-site. Based on wash time of three minutes per vehicle, and queuing for eleven vehicles, 31 vehicles per hour can be processed or stored on-site. The conservative estimates of site-generated traffic prepared for this study indicate that a maximum of 16 vehicles per hour would visit the car wash. Thus, more than sufficient queue storage space is available to ensure that all vehicles waiting to use the car wash could be stored on the site, and no vehicles would need to wait on Factory Avenue to access the car wash. Conclusions 1. Although the site will generate additional traffic, this traffic can be adequately accommodated by the existing roadway network. 2. Intersection capacity analyses performed in accordance with the methodology set forth in the 2000 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual indicate that the additional traffic generated by the proposed development will have minimal impact on operations at the signalized intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue. 3. In keeping with good access management practices, the site plan for the project proposes a single driveway on Main Road and two driveways on Factory Avenue. One existing driveway on M~ Road will be closed. 4. The access driveways will operate in a safe and efficient manner, without causing undue delays. 5. The applicant remains willing to enter into a cross access arrangement with the adjacent shopping center property, at such time as the property owner would be willing to provide cross access. Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 9 6. More than sufficient queue storage will be available on the site so that no vehicles will need to wait on Factory Avenue to access the car wash. 7. The applicant is willing to dedicate property on the northeast comer of Factory Avenue at Main Road to facilitate the improvement of the existing turning radius deficiency at that location. In light of the foregoing, and based on professional transportation engineering considerations, it is recommended that the proposed project be approved. If you have any questions or need any further information, please call me. i~ent Corrado~ P.E. Associate Engineer VC:as L207329 P26069 · Semon, Bruno From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Trip gen letter, pdf (85 KB) Bruno Vincent Corrado [vcorrado@dunn-pc.com] ;/' Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1:38 PM Semon, Bruno Vivian Kamath (E-mail); George [NEWSENDER] - GAMA Realty Mattituck (Citgo, n/e/c Route 25 at Factory Avenue) - Message is from an unknown sender Trip gen letter, pdf Thanks for spending the time with us to go over the above on 12/3. Attached is a memo we sent to the Planning Board regarding comparisons between automated and full service car washes. Please call if you have any questions. VC <<Trip gen letter.pdf>> VINCENT ANGELO CORRADO P.E. Associate Engineer Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 631-288-2480 x1128 631-288-2544 Fax vcorrado@dunn-pc.com Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. ~onsulting Engineer~ 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 631-288-2480 631-288-2544 Fax December 17, 2007 Ms. Jeff Woodhouse, Chair Planning Board Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Proposed Car Wash Addition GAMA Properties N/E Comer NYS Rte. 25 Mattituek, NY Madam Chair and Members of the Board: This letter provides additional information requested at the planning board work session on December 3, 2007. As you may recall, the board sought reassurance that the number of vehicles estimated to be generated by the addition of an automated car wash to the existing gas station operation at the above site represents a conservative examination of the potential impact on traffic due to the project. In our original traffic impact assessment, information provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers report "Trip Generation" (seventh edition) was utilized to estimate the number of trips anticipated due to the addition of an automated car wash to the site. Utilizing information in the report regarding automated car washes (Land Use Code 94g) resuked in an estimated 18 (9 entering and 9 exiting) new trips during the weekday AM peak hour, and 22 (11 entering and 11 exiting) new trips during the weekday PM peak hour. However, the information provide in the report was based on studies at a small number of car washes, and no information was available on Saturdays for this land use. Therefore, the analysis performed in our original traffic study also considered data from the ITE report on full service ear washes, known as conveyor type car washes in the industry. The information in the ITE report on full service car washes, under Land Use Code 946, estimated that a full service car wash would generate 40 new trips (22 entering and 18 exiting), during the weekday AM peak, approximately double the number of trips estimated using the data on automated car washes. Similarly, 38 new trips (17 entering and 21 exiting) during the weekday PM peak were predicted, 73% higher than predicted using the data on automated car washes. In the interest of providing a conservative worst-case estimation of the potential traffic impact of the proposed car wash addition, the higher numbers predicted using the full service car wash data was utilized in all analysis performed for our study. Madam Chair and Members of the Board December 17, 2007 Page 2 In order to reassure the board that in fact the information in our study does provide a conservative estimate, information regarding characteristics for several types of car washes was obtained. A report provided by representatives of the car wash industry regarding activities at different types of car washes indicates that the number of washes per year at a full sen/ce car wash can be expected to be 50% higher than at an automated car wash. In rural areas, the disparity was found to be even higher. Trips generated by automated car washes of the type proposed in this project were found to be approximately half the number generated by a typical full service (conveyor) type car wash. Nationwide, the average full service car wash provided 82,000 washes per year, while the average automated car wash provided 54,200. In rural areas, the report indicates that the average full service ear wash provided 48,177 washes per year, while the average automatic car wash provided 23,583 washes per year. Thus, it can be seen that data provided by the car wash industry supports the fact that automated car washes can be expected to generate sigdifieantly less lzaffic than full service ear washes, and that the estimates of potential new trips utilized in the analyses performed in out original traffic assessment present a conservative worst ease scenario. Since the results of those analyses indicate that the addition of the traffic generated by the proposed car wash will have minimal impact on the adjacent roadway network, and that the layout of the proposed car wash can successfully accommodate the conservatively estimated number of trips, we recommend that, based on transportation engineering considerations, the project be approved. Thank you for your continued attention to this matter. If you have any questions, or need any further information, please call me. Enjoy the holiday season. Vincent A. Corrado, P.E. Associate Engineer VC:as L207376 P26069 CC: Vivian Kamath, DSC Construction, via e-mail Bruno Semen, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold, via e-mail December 17, 2007 Ms. Jeri Woodhouse, Chair Planning Board Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dunn Engineering Associatl~ P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 631-288-2480 631-288-2544 Fax ']7 Re; Proposed Car WashAddition GAMA Properties N/EComerNYSRte. 25 MaRituck, NY Madam Chair and Members of the Board: This ie~er provides additibnal information requested at the planning board Work sess~oti on December 3, 2007. As you mayrecall, the board sought reassurance that. th~ nUmber of 9chicles estimated to be generated by the additiOn Of an automated car wash to the ~xiSting gas statiori operation at the above site represents a conservative examination of the potential impact on traffic due to the project. In our original traffic impact assessment, information provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers report "Trip Generation" (seventh edition) was utilized to estimate the number of trips anticipated due to the addition of an automated car wash to the site. Utilizing information in the report regarding automated car washes (Land Use Code 948) resulted in an estimated 18 (9 entering and 9 exiting) new trips during the weekday AM peak hour, and 22 ( 11 emering and 11 exiting) new trips during the weekday PM peak hour. However, the information provide in the report was based on studies at a small number of car washes, and no information was available on Saturdays for this land use. Therefore, the analysis performed in our original traffic study also considered data from the ITE report on full service car washes, known as conveyor type car washes in the industry. The information in the ITE report on full service car washes, under Land Use Code 946, estimated that a full service car wash would generate 40 new trips (22 entering and 18 exiting), during the weekday AM peak, approximately double the number of trips estimated using the data on automated car washes. Similarly, 38 new trips (17 entering and 21 exiting) during the weekday pM peak ?vere ~:edi~ted~ 73% higher than predicted using the data on automated. Car Washes. In the imerest 6f providing a 'conservative W°rStZcase estimation of the potential traffic'impact Of the propO d Car wash addition, the higher numbers predicted using the full service car wash data was utilized in all analysis performed for our study. Madam Chair and Members of the Board December 17, 2007 Page 2 In order to reassure the board that in fact the information in our study does provide a conservative estimate, information regarding characteristics for several types of car washes was obtained. A report provided by representatives of the car wash industry regarding activities at different types of car washes indicates that the number of washes per year at a full service car wash can be expected to be 50% higher than at an automated car wash. In rural areas, the disparity was found to be even higher. Trips generated by automated car washes of the type proposed in this project were found to be approximately half the number generated by a typical full service (conveyor) type car wash. Nationwide, the average full service car wash provided 82,000 washes per year, while the average automated car wash provided 54,200. In rural areas, the report indicates that the average full service car wash provided 48,177 washes per year, while the average automatic car wash provided 23,583 washes per year. Thus, it can be seen that data provided by the car wash industry supports the fact that automated car washes can be expected to generate significantly less traffic than full service car washes, and that the estimates of potential new trips utilized in the analyses performed in out original traffic assessment present a conservative worst case scenario. Since the results of those analyses indicate that the addition of the traffic generated by the proposed car wash will have minimal impact on the adjacent roadway network, and that the layout of the proposed car wash can successfully accommodate the conservatively estimated number of trips, we recommend that, based on transportation engineering considerations, the project be approved. Thank you for your continued attention to this matter. If you have any questions, or need any further information, please call me. Enjoy the holiday season. Vincent A. Corrado, P.E. Associate Engineer VC:as L207376 P26069 CC; Vivian Kamath, DSC Construction, via e-mail Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold, via e-mail Eugene G. Kempey, P. E. 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New York 11704 T. 631-321-7777 F. 631-661-0486 December 12, 2007 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall. 53095 Main Road. Southold, New York 11971 ATTN: Mrs. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse GAMA Properties / Warex Terminals 9945 Main Road, Matfituck SCTM# 1000-141-01-27 Zoning District: B Dear Mrs. Woodhouse, As per the Town Engineers letter on the.abb'/;6 ~'f~renCed project dated December 3, 2007, the following are responses to the comments. The drainage calculations that have been provided on SP-Zbl indicate an increase in hardened surfaces because as per the proposed site plan the existing landscaped area in the North of the property will be used for a driveway to enter the carwash tunnel, thus eliminating much of the landscape in the North of the property. As per the drainage calculations Existing and proposed square footages for landscape asphalt and building/canopy have been shown. The existing pools size and depth will be shown. For the runoff from the Car Wash tunnel we will install a catch basin that will tie into an existing drywell to prohibit any excess runoff from entering into Factory Avenue. We have altered the Site Plan to show a four foot minimum of landscaping between the Easterly and Westerly parking areas as per Section 280-95. We have taken this into consideration and we are proposing to add in several trees throughout the site to compensate for the removal of the existing trees located along the Northwesterly Property line. Eugene G. Kempey, P. E. 640 Sunrise Highway W. Babylon, New York 11704 T. 631-321-7777 F. 631-661-0486 o The propoSed pavement radius at the entrance of the Car Wash has been taken into consideration and with consultation from Dunn Engineering who are our Traffic Consultants, have found this radius to be satisfactory. There will be a separate retaining wall that will be installed at this location to provide for the grade change. Guard rails will be installed at this location. Details will be provided with the revised Site Plans. 6. We have made a submission to the NYSDOT and are awaiting comments. The area of dedication is flexible and we are agreeable to reconfigure this parcel according to NYSDOT's comments and suggestions. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please advise. F/~incerely~ ~ ~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND December 11, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DSC Construction Corp. Mr. Vivian Kamath 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: Warrex Terminals Site Plan - Town Engineer Comments. 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-141-01-27 Zoning District B Dear Mr. Kamath, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated December 3, 2007 from the Southold Town Engineer. The Planning Board held a work session on December 10, 2007 to review the enclosed letter and agreed to accept the comments as submitted. Please review the enclosed comments. Please revise the site plan as required based on the comments of the Town Engineer. For convenience prior to revising the site plan you may submk a draft version with hand drawn notes of proposed changes for review. This can be completed prior to submitting the formal changes to the Planning Department. The Planning Department will require a minimum of six (6) revised site plans to be submitted for referral to the agencies with jurisdiction. Please indicate in writing if the proposed changes will be incorporated to satisfy the concerns addressed. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. "~rnn; ~'emon Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. (TE letter dated December 3, 2007) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND December 11, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC. Mr. Charles Voorhis 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747-2188 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re~ Warrex Terminals Site Plan - Town Engineer Comments. 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-141-01-27 Zoning District B Dear Chic, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated December 3, 2007 from the Southold Town Engineer and Southold Town Transportation Commission letter dated November 27, 2007. The Planning Board held work sessions to review the enclosed letters and agreed to accept the comments as submitted. Additionally, the comments were sent to the agent to be incorporated into a revised site plan. Please be advised that the Planning Board has accepted the Traffic Study sent to your office on November 14, 2007 for the file and the Planning Board will refrain from a SEQRA determination until receipt of revised comments from NPV. Please review the enclosed comments, Traffic Study, revised site plan and issue a report to the Planning Board. Be advise the next scheduled Planning Board Public Meeting Date is January 14, 2008. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. ~Senior Site ~lan Riviewer CC:file enc. (TE letter dated December 3, 2007, Southold Transportation Conunission letter dated November 27, 2007) SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAiN ROAD Fax. (631)-765-9015 JAMES A. RICHTER,R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel. (631) - 765 - 1560 JAMIE.RICHTER~TOV~rN.SOUTHOLD.NY.U S OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: Re; December 3, 2007 WAREX Site Plan 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, NY SCTM #: 1000-142-01-27 As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. This project includes the reconstruction of the existing facility to include a new Car Wash. In addition, the project includes the renovation of the existing Gas Station & Convenience Store. This site plan has been prepared by the office of Eugene G. Kempey, PE. and has a revision date of 10/30/07. Please consider the following: 1. Drainage Calculations have been provided on drawing SP-Zbl. These calculations indicate that only the net increase in hardened surface areas will be used to determine new drainage. I have reviewed this issue with the Highway Superintendent. His concern is whether or not run-off will be directed out onto Factory Ave. Existing Inlet Structures have been noted on the drawing but the size of these existing drainage pools have not been indicated. This information will be required to evaluate the adequacy of the existing drainage system. All leaching pools, both new as well as those indicated as existing, should be numbered and their size should be referenced. This information should be added to the Site Plan for review. If this information can not be determined satisfactorily, the drainage calculations should be revised to include the entire site when determining the required amount of new drainage. 2. The requirement for Landscaping Parking Areas under Section 280-95 requires a minimum of four (4') feet between Pavement and Property Lines. The proposed new setback along the Northwesterly and Northeasterly Property Lines would appear to be only two (2') feet. This item should be addressed by the Planning Board. 3. The proposed concrete curb and pavement areas along the Northwesterly Property Line will require the removal of several mature trees that are between twelve (12") and twenty four (24") inches in diameter. Will there be any consideration for new tree planting specifically to replace these trees? 4. The proposed pavement radius at the entrance to the Car Wash shows an outside turning radius of twenty four 24' feet. This radius appears to be tight and may create conflicts for vehicles accessing the Car Wash. This item should be reviewed by the applicants Engineer. Page - 1 of 2 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Re: WAREX Site Plan SCTM #: 1000-142-01-27 December 3, 2007 Page - 2 of 2 5. The proposed new Concrete Curb and Pavement Elevations located immediately north of the existing building would appear to be excessively high when compared to the height of the existing Retaining Wall located on the adjacent property. Along the Northwesterly Property line, the top of new curbing will be approximately three (3') feet above the existing wall that is less than four (4') feet away. The curbing at the end of the turning radius appears to be more than three (3') feet above the wall that is less than two (2') feet away. This existing retaining wall should not be used to support the proposed new construction or additional fill that will be placed to achieve these design grades. In addition, how will erosion be controlled in this sloped area? Will Guard Rails be required to protect vehicles from the steep drop to the adjacent property? It is recommended that the project Engineer review this matter and provide additional retaining wall and Guard Rail details that would address these concerns. 6. Has the NY State Dept of Transportation reviewed this project? Curb Cut and or Highway Work Permits should be required for this project. Some of the items that have been shown in the State ROW may not be approved bythe DOT and should not be shown on the filed map. 7. There is also a note shown on the Site Plan which indicates that 231 Sq. Ft. of the Southerly comer of this site will be dedicated for future turning radius improvements for the west bound traffic of State Route 25 turning North onto Factory Ave. This item should also be reviewed and commented on by the State DOT Traffic Engineers. The configuration of the area that will be dedicated should be flexible enough to allow the designs of a new turn to dictate how this area should be shaped. In addition to the items above, I have also had the opportunity to review the Traffic Engineering Assessment that has been prepared by Dunn Engineering. Some of the items listed in my report herein have been addressed and/or supported by this Dunn Engineering Traffic Assessment. At this time, this Traffic Engineering Report would appear to be a comprehensive review of all site conditions related to traffic and its conclusions have been supported in a suitable manner. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. cc: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) SOUTHOLD TItANSPOI~TATI ON COI~[~IISSION ITown Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971*0959 Phone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Ms. Amy Thiel Senior Planner Neboysha R Brashich{~.. ~_ Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Further to your letter dated November 14, the Commission reviewed subject project proposal for the third time at its November 26 meeting. The Commission approves the revised proposal with one proviso. As you are aware, State Route 25 is a designated NYS scenic byway. We request that the proposed scenic quality of the site be maintained via appropriate plantings and that the proposed building be as architecturally pleasing as possible along the lines of the Hess stations in Easthampton and Bridgehampton on the South Fork. ~ DSC C( NSTRUCTIO CORP. 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Tel. 631-321-7777 Fax 631-661-0486 August 23, 2007 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, NY 11952 Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee RE: SCTM: DATE: 1000-142-1-27 July 26th, 2007 ARC Meeting Warex Proiect: Regarding the conditional approval, pending the submitted revised plan; 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. We have shown on the rendering the doggy dormers on the rendering to matching the elevations as per the site plan. We have also adjusted the windows from the arched shaped to the square shape on the rendering, and have also specified them on the elevations. We have redesigned the cupola to match the existing, as well as maintaining the original cupola as best as possible. We have matched the design of the columns supporting the canopy with the pilasters attached to the building. We have shown the pattern of the cultured stone on the elevations, and will decide on a suitable color during construction. We have eliminated the white band around the canopy on the elevations. As per the site plan SP-Zb, and SP-Zbl we have shown and denoted the landscaping. We have also updated the front elevation to show a split window with the grills being on top portion of the window to allow for signage and a clear view into the store. This is also mimicked in the transom unit above the main double door entrance. Attached please find in jpeg format the existing signage that will remain. Regards, Evan Ramlochan DSC CONSTRUCTION CORP. 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Tel. 631-32D7777 Fax 631-661-0486 Figure I Figure 1: Signage for Warex looking northwest from the adjacent parking area. Main rd. is to the left of this sign, and Factory Avenue is behind this sign. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator From: Amy Thiel, Senior Planner ~ Date: November 27, 2007 Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM#: 1000-142-1-27 In reference to the above, please find enclosed a copy of the revised traffic engineering assessment prepared byDunn Engineering, P.C. dated November 2, 2007 and a revised site plan prepared by Eugene Kempey dated June 13, 2007 and last revised October 30, 2007. The Phnning Board initiated SEQRA lead agency on September 10, 2007 and assumed lead agency on October 15, 2007. In addition, the Planning Board has authorized Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLCto complete the environmental review of this project. As discussed please review the enclosed along with the LWRP consistency forn~ Once accepted bythe Planning Board, the LWRP report will forwarded on to Nelson, Pope & Voorhis for incorporation into their environmental review. Your comments will assist the Planning Board in making a SEQRA determination. The enclosed information is for your review and records and does not need to be retumed to the Planning Board. Thankyouinadvance. Cc: File Eric.: One (1) revised site plan prepared by Eugene Kempey dated June 13, 2007 and last revised October 30, 2007. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM James Dinizio, Chairman Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals From: Amy Thiel, Senior Planner Date: November 27, 2007 Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituclg New York SCTM#: 1000-142-1-27 In reference to the above, please find enclosed a copy of the revised traffic engineering assessment prepared by Durra Engineering, P.C. dated November 2, 2007. The Planning Board initiated SEQRA lead agency on September 10, 2007 and assumed lead agency on October 15, 2007. In addition, the Planning Board has authorized Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC to complete the environmental review of this project. Please notify this office if you have any comments regarding the enclosed. Your comments will assist the Planning Board in making a SEQRA determination. The enclosed information is for your review and records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: File Eric.: Traffic Engineering Assessment dated November 2, 2007 prepared byDunn Engineering Associates, P.C PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND November 14, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC, Mr. Charles Voorhis 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747-2188 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business Dear Mr. Voorhis: As referenced in the previous letter dated October 24, 2007, please find enclosed a copyof the revised Traffic Engineering Assessment prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C dated November 2, 2007. Please be aware tiffs traffic assessment will be presented to the Phnning Board for their review on November 26, 2007. We kindly request you refrain from making any final determination until such time as the Planning Board has had an opportunity to review the enclosed traffic assessment and obtain comments from other involved/interested agencies. Anycomments/concems of the Planning Board and involved/interested agencies will be forwarded to you following review. In addition, please find enclosed a letter from Eugene Kempey regarding a change in the proposed site plan and a copy of the revised site plan dated June 13, 2007 and last revised October 30, 2007 prepared by the Ple.ase do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. inc. Cc: File PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND November 14, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Neboysha Braskich Southold Transportation Commission 175 Emory Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business Dear Mr. Brashich: In reference to the above, enclosed you will find a revised site plan prepared by Eugene Kempey dated June 13, 2007 and last revised October 30, 2007. The site plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. As stated in the attached cover letter from Eugene Kempeythe proposed building has been enlarged approximately 3'. In addition, please find enclosed a copy of the proposed traffic engineering assessment prepared byDunn Engineering, P.C dated November 2, 2007. The Planning Board initiated SEQRA lead agency on September 10, 2007 and assumed lead agency on October 15, 2007. In addition, the Planning Board has authorized Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC to complete the environmental review of this project. Your comments will assist the Phnning Board in making a SEQRA determination. The enclosed site plan and subsequent information is being referred to you for your review and recommendations. We respectfully request this be added to the November 26, 2007 agenda of the Southold Transportation Commission. If possible, please return the site plan to either myself or Bnmo at the meeting on Monday. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. 1 site plan prepared by Eugene Kempey dated June 13, 2007 and last revised October 30, 2007 Cover letter from Eugene Kempey dated October 30, 2007 Traffic Engineering Assessment dated November 2, 2007 prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C Cc: File PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southo]d, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 F~x: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector James A. Richter, Town Engineer From: Amy Thiel, Senior Planner Date: November 14, 2007 Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan. Please be aware the original referral regarding this application was dated July 22, 2006 and the most recent dated August 27, 2007. The site plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. As stated in the attached cover letter from Eugene Kempeythe proposed building has been enlarged approximately 3'. In addition, please find enclosed a copy of the proposed traffic engineering assessment prepared by Durra Engineering, P.C. dated November 2, 2007. The Planning Board initiated SEQRA lead agency on September 10, 2007 and assumed lead agency on October 15, 2007. In addition, the Planning Board has authorized Nelson, Pope & Voorhls, LLCto complete the environmental review of this project. Your comments will assist the Planning Board in making a SEQRA determination. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. The enclosed site plan and associated information is for your review and records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thankyouinadvance. Enc.: File 1 site plan prepared by Eugene Kempey dated June 13, 2007 and last revised October 30, 2007 Cover letter from Eugene Kempey dated october 30, 2007 Traffic Engineering Assessment dated November 2, 2007 prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C. 66 Main Street WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 (631) 288-2480 (631) 288-2544 Fax TO: Town of Southold Planning Department PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 WE ARE SENDING YOU: X Attached Shop drawings Prints Copy of letter Change order LETTER OF TRANSMITT~E DATE: 11/2/20071 JOB NO. ATTENTION: Amy Thiel RE: GAMA Properties (Warex) Under separate cover via ~ the following items: Plans Samples Specifications Copies Date No. Description 3 Nov-07 Traffic Impact Assessment for Proposed Car Wash THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit X For your use Approved as noted Submit X As requested Returned forcorrections Return For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE: copies for approval copies for distribution __corrected prints REMARKS: Amy Enclosed am 3 copies of the reportl emailed to you on Friday. The applicant has resubmitted the revised report to ,I~;SDOT for their review as well. Please call if you have any questions. ~ //~',/'///,// Vincent A, Corrado, PE COPY TO: File *--'?,,,',,',~' ' ~ ........... "*~'~'? ~' SIGNED: November 2, 2007 Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp. 640 Sunrise Highway 6West Babylon, NY 11704 Dear Mr. Kamath: Dunn Engineering Associ~s, P.C. Consulting Engineers 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. t 1978 631-288-2480 631-288-2544 Fax Re: Traffic Engineering Assessment Proposed Car Wash Addition N/e comer NYS Rte. 25 Mattituck, NY As requested, Dunn Engineering Associates PC has completed our professional traffic engineering evaluation in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the existing gasohne station, located on the northeast comer of Main Road (NYS Route25) at Factory Avenue, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The project envisions the expansion of the existing convenience store and addition of an automatic car wash to the gasoline station. Figure 1 shows the location of the project site and Figure 2 shows the boundaries of the property and the adjacent roadway network. Our examination was performed to evaluate the potential traffic impact of the proposed development, including trip generation, access, roadway capacity and safety. During the course of the study, the following specific work tasks were performed: l. Several personal visits to the site to attest to our observations of existing traffic movements at various times of the day and under different conditions. 2. Collection and analysis of existing traffic data as available from the Town of Southold, New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. ' Estimates of the additional traffic that will be generated by the proposed project. These estimates were based on information provided in the latest (7th) edition of the report Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 4 4. Examination of the ability of the street network to accommodate the additional volumes that wiil be generated by the, proposed use. Intersection capacity analyses was performed at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue and Factory Avenue at the site access driveway for the following scenarios: a. 2008 No-Build Traffic b. 2008 Build Traffic 5. Examination of access to and from the site and the parking area from the standpoint of location and design. 6. Evaluation of the geometric features of the proposed quene storage area. 7. Preparation of a letter report setting forth our findings and conclusions. The following sections present the results of our efforts in this regard. Existing Conditions As previously stated, the site is located on the northeast comer of NYS Route 25, Main Road, at Factory Avenue, in Mattituck. The gas station is surrounded on two sides by a shopping center. At present, the site contains a gas station with eight fueling stations, two service bays that are currently unused, and a small convenience store. The site has access to both NYS Route 25 and to Factory Avenue. There is one existing driveway on Factory Avenue and two on Main Road. In order to determine the amount of traffic being generated by the existing use of the site, traffic counts were performed at the three existing site driveways during the weekday 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM peak periods, and during the Saturday Midday peak period. The results of these traffic counts are presented in Table 1. As can be seen, the weekday AM peak hour occurs between 7:00 an 8:00 AM, when 28 vehicles entered the site and 30 vehicles left the site, and the weekday PM peak hour occurred between 4:00 and 5:00 PM, when 32 vehicles entered the site and 33 left the site. On Saturday, 53 vehicles entered the site and 46 vehicles left the site during the peak hour, which occurred between 1:00 and 2:00 PM. 28 Table 1 Site Generated Traffic Existing Gas Station with Convenience Store Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 5 Main Road is a New York State highway facility that provides direct access to the site. Although NYS Route 25 extends the entire length of Long Island, it serves as Main Street for many of the communities along the north fork of Long Island, including Mattituck. Near the site of the proposed development, Main Road provides one lane in each direction, flanked by shoulders, with additional turning lanes at major intersections. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Development along Main Road near the site is primarily commercial. According to information provided by New York State Department of Transportation, the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on Main Road in Mattituck in 2004 was 12849 vehicles per day. Notethat AADTis a transportation engineering and planning term defined as the average traffic volume at a given location on any day of the year, including weekends, and is not utilized in detailed analyses. The intersection of NYS Route 25 at Factory Avenue is controlled by a traffic signal that is maintained by NYSDOT. This signal also controls the northbound approach of Sigsbec Avenue, which is off-set to the west from Factory Avenue. Factory Avenue forms an acute angle with Maine Road, as it is skewed to the northeast. The very tight turning radius presents difficulties for vehicles turning from westbound Main Road onto northbound Factory Avenue, particularly trucks. Future Site Trip Generation The current site plan for the proposed development envisions the expansion of the existing small convenience store, and the addition of an automated car wash to the site. The eight fueling stations will be retained, and the service bays will be removed. Information contained in the report "Trip Generation", 7th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, was consulted to estimate the number of new trips expected to be generated by the proposed project. Under Land Use Code 948, Automated Car Wash, the ITE report presents data on trip making characteristics for a stand-alone car wash. Automated car washes are defined in the ITE report as "facilities that allow for the mechanical cleaning of the exterior of vehicles". Although, some of the sites in the ITE report provided auto detailing and other related services, only exterior cleaning is proposed at the site. No vacuuming or interior cleaning services are to be provided. The information in the report indicates that a car wash of the size proposed under this application might be expected to generate 18 new trips (9 entering and 9 exiting) during the weekday PM peak hour, and 22 new trips ( 11 entering and 11 exiting) during the Saturday Midday peak hour. However, the information in the report is based on studies conducted at one or two car washes, and the user is cautioned in its use due to the small sample size. In addition, no information is provided as to trip generation at car washes during the weekday AM peak hour. The ITE report also provides data regarding trip making at gas stations with convenience stores and car washes, under Land Use Code 946, Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash. Once again, under this Land Use Code, no data is presented for the Saturday peak hour. Therefore, it has been estimated for the purposes of this report that the new trips generated by the site during the Saturday midday peak hour will be proportional to the increase in trips during the other peak hour analyzed for this report. Based on this information, all the combined future uses on the Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 6 site would generate a total of 98 trips during the weekday AM peak hour, and 110 trips during the weekday PM peak hour. ,This represents an increase of 40 new trips in the AM and 38 during the weekday PM above the existing traffic. On Saturday, this methodology results in a total of 60 new trips, 32 entering and 28 exiting, which is considerably higher than the ITE report predicts that a new standalone automated car wash would generate, and is in fact greater than a new full service car wash would generate. It must be noted that information provided by the applicant regarding automated car washes indicted that the number of washes at automated car washes is between 25 and 50% of full service car washes. Therefore, use of this methodology results in an extremely conservative estimate of the traffic expected to be generated by the site. It should also be noted that not all the traffic visiting the car wash would be new traffic added to the roadway network. Rather, it is likely that some portion of the traffic would already be on the roadway network for another purpose, and will visit the car wash as part of that multipurpose trip. However, for the purposes of this report, it has been assumed that all the traffic visiting the proposed car wash would be new traffic, thereby supporting a conservative worst-case evaluation. This trip generation information is presented in Table 2. The site-generated traffic was then distributed on the new driveway configuration, and on the roadway network. It has been assumed that the new site generated traffic will have origins and destinations similar to the traffic already visiting the site. Note that the existing gas station traffic was also redistributed on the roadway network to reflect the new driveway configuration. Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash LUC 946 Less Existing Gas Station Traffic Total New Site Generated Traffic 50 28 22 48 55 55 N/A N/A 30 38 34 53 46 18 17 21 32* 28* * Assumed number of new trips. See text for explanation. Table 2 Site Generated Traffic Gas Station with Convenience Store and Car Wash Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 7 Access Examination As stated, there are currently three driveways serving the site, two on Main Road and one on Factory Avenue. The westerly driveway on Main Road is located less than 25 feet east of Factory Avenue. The driveway on Factory Avenue is located less than 50 feet north of Main Road and less than 20 feet north of the stop line for southbound traffic at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue. In keeping with good access management practices and in conformance with NYSDOT's policy regarding driveways on State highways, the westernmost driveway on Main Road will be eliminated. The remaining driveway on Main Road will be configured to allow for fight tums only into and out of the site. Left and right tums into and out of the site will be permitted at the driveway on Factory Avenue. Note also that car wash patrons will have access only to Factory Avenue and no internal access to the car wash will be possible from the fueling area. While this driveway configuration is not considered ideal, the access design reflects the desire on the part of the Town of Southold that no access to the car wash be provided from the State highway due to concerns regarding potential queues on Main Road. Due to the low volume of traffic expected to be generated by the car wash, such queues are considered unlikely; however, the access configuration shown on the site is considered more desirable by the Town. Patrons leaving the fueling area will be directed by on-site signing to access the car wash by turning onto Factory Avenue from Main Road. Finally, note that, as requested by the Town, the applicant has attempted to obtain access to the parking lot of the adjacent shopping center property. However, the owner of that property is unwilling to provide access at this time. The applicant remains willing to enter into a cross access agreement with the adjacent property owner. Intersection Capacity Analyses In order to ensure that the proposed project will not have any detrimental impact on operating conditions on the roadway network, and to ensure that the site driveways will operate in a safe and efficient manner, without undue delay for vehicles entering and leaving the proposed development, signalized and unsignalized intersection capacity analyses have been performed. These capacity analyses were performed utilizing sol,rare based on the methodologies set forth in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, and utilized the traffic volumes described above, adjusted to reflect peak summer season, and the estimates of new vehicles expected to be generated by the proposed development, and also reflect the traffic generated by the new CVS drugstore on the southwest comer of Main Road at Factory Avenue. The results of these capacity analyses indicate that excellent levels of service can be expected to prevail at the driveway, and that no undue delay-s to vehicles traveling on Factory Avenue will occur. In addition, the low volumes new traffic generated by the project will have minimal impact on operating conditions at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue, and no deterioration in the levels of service at this intersection will occur during the three peak hours examined. During the weekday AM peak, the intersection will function at LOS C, and no deterioration in LOS is predicted due to the proposed project. Similarly, Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 8 during the weekday PM and Saturday peak, LOS D is predicted and again no changes occur due to the proposed project. Ngte tha~ these capacity analyses have been prepared using the extremely conservative worst case projections for site generated traffic for the proposed site. Copies of the results of these intersection capacity analyses are attached. Turning Radius Improvement As previously stated, the turning radius for westbound Main Road to northbound Factory Avenue is limited due to the alignment of Factory Avenue. Vehicles have been observed experiencing difficulty in executing this movement, especially when southbound left turning vehicles are queued at the stop line on Factory Avenue. It is highly recommended that this existing turning radius deficiency be improved. In order to assist the Town of Southold and/or NYSDOT in improving this existing deficiency, the applicant is willing to dedicate property on the northeast comer of the site so that a larger turning radius can he installed. The approximate area of this dedication is shown on the site plan. Car Wash Queue The site plan shows queuing storage for eleven vehicles on-site. Based on wash time of three minutes per vehicle, and queuing for eleven vehicles, 31 vehicles per hour can be processed or stored on-site. The conservative estimates of site-generated traffic prepared for this study indicate that a maximum of 16 vehicles per hour would visit the car wash. Thus, more than sufficient queue storage space is available to ensure that all vehicles waiting to use the car wash could be stored on the site, and no vehicles would need to wait on Factory Avenue to access the car wash. Conclusions 1. Although the site will generate additional traffic, this traffic can be adequately accommodated by the existing roadway network. 2. Intersection capacity analyses performed in accordance with the methodology set forth in the 2000 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual indicate that the additional traffic generated by the proposed development will have minimal impact on operations at the signalized intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue. 3. In keeping with good access management practices, the site plan for the pmject proposes a single driveway on Main Road and two driveways on Factory Avenue. One existing driveway on Main Road will be closed. 4. The access driveways will operate in a safe and efficient manner, without causing undue delays. 5. The applicant remains willing to enter into a cross access arrangement with the adjacent shopping center property, at such time as the property owner would be willing to provide cross access. Mr. Vivian Kamath November 2, 2007 Page 9 6. More than sufficient queue storage will be available on the site so that no vehicles will need to wait on Factory Avenue to access the car wash. 7. The applicant is willing to dedicate property on the northeast comer olfactory Avenue at Main Road to facilitate the improvement of the existing turning radius deficiency at that location. In light of the foregoing, and based on professional transportation engineering considerations, it is recommended that the proposed project be approved. If you have any questions or need any further information, please call me. Associate Engineer VC:as L207329 P26069 October 30, 2007 Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY ! 1971 Eugene G. Kempey, P.E. 640 Sunrise Highway, West Babylon, NY 11704 T (631) 321-7777 F (631) 661~0486 ATTN: Amy Thiel Warex Terminals Site Plan - Southold Town Transportation Commission comments. 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-141-01-27 Zoning District: B Dear Mrs. Thiel, Transmittal herewith, for your review and approval, are five copies of the amended Site Plan drawings numbered SP-Zb, and SP-Zbl as well as five copies of the Building Elevations numbered A-1 and A-2 and Zero Discharge System Plan SS-1 dated 10/30/07 on the above referenced project. These drawings reflect a change from the prior submission based on a mistake on our part with regards tO the size of the existing building. The rear of the building was enlarged by approximately 3'-0" more than the existing building. Since we propose to maintain the existing building footprint, we have revised the attached drawings to reflect the correct dimensions of the building. We have also shown a proposed dedication of 231 sq.fi, from the existing property for future turning radius improvements to the Northeast comer of the intersection at Factory Av. and Main Rd. Thank you for your consideration and understanding. Sincerely, Page 1 of 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 October 24, 2007 Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC. Mr. Charles Voorhis 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747-2188 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business Dear Mr. Voorhis: The Planning Board received the estimate letter dated September 7, 2007 for the above listed project and accepted the estimate at their work session on September 10, 2007. The Planning Board has authorized you to start the review as described in the estimate. The Planning Board began lead agency coordination for this unlisted action at the public meeting on September 10, 2007 and assumed lead agency at the public meeting on October 15, 2007. Please find enclosed the following items to assist in the environmental review of this project: · SEQRA Environmental Assessment Form Part I. · SEQRA lead agency coordination resolutions dated September 11, 2007 and October 16, 2007. · A copy of the Traffic Engineering Assessment prepared by Dunn Engineering dated July 12, 2006. · I site plan prepared byEugene Kempey dated June 13, 2007 & last revised August 20, 2007. · Building Department Norice of Disapproval dated December 27, 2005 and last amended on September 21, 2007. · June 28, 2006 letter from Mattituck Fire District. · July7, 2006 letter from New York State Department of Transportation. · July 13, 2006 letter from Suffolk CountyWater Authority. · October 25, 2006 comments from the Town Engineer. Please be aware the Town Engineer is currently reviewing the revised plan and additional comments will be forthcoming. · July 6, 2007 comments from the SouthoId Town Transportation Commission. · Zoning Board of Appeals application and associated information. · Aerial photo, August 30, 2006 site visit photos and August 22, 2007 rendering of the site. Warex Project Page Two October 24, 2007 Please be aware the Traffic Engineering Assessment prepared by Dunn Engineering dated July 12, 2006 is currently being revised/updated to reflect the current build out of the site. An amended copy will be forwarded to you upon receipt. Please contact this office at 631.765.1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.~ and 4:00 p.m. should you have any questions or need anything further. Senior Planner Encs. cc: File PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND October 16, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corporation 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, New York 11704 Re; Proposed Site Plan for Warex Terminals Corporation Located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue, known as 9945 Main Road, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: General Business (B) Dear Mr. Kamath: The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, October 15, 2007, adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, this site plan is for the proposed alteration of an existing gas station which will include the removal of the existing 3-bay service station to expand the existing convenience store, expand the existing gas pump canopy and add a new car wash, where 1,146 sq. ft. is for the convenience store, 907 sq. ft. is for the car wash and approximately 3,434 sq. ft. is for the canopy including 12 parking spaces onsite, on a .55-acre parcel in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue, known as 9945 Main Road, in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 2007, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 2007, the Southold Town Planning Board accepted an estimate from Nelson Pope and Voorhis, LLC for the environmental review and forwarded the estimate to the applicant for review and payment; and WHEREAS ¢)n September 27, 2007, th¢. ann r-anf ~,,hm tfn¢l a ~-ha.--L. for" ' "+ ¢ ........ ~ ...... ~.ayme, ,, ,or the environmental review; and ..... ~'*' ............... WHEREAS, the Planning Board will forward all necessary information to Nelson Pope and Voorhis. LLC for review once the revised Traffic Engineering Assessment has been received and the Zoning Board of Appeals has issued a decision regarding the special exception car wash use in order to avoid any unnecessary financial burden on the applicant; and Warex Project Page Two October 16, 2007 WHEREAS, pursuant to Southold Town Code §280-131 B (4), the applicant must obtain permission from the Zoning Board of Appeals prior to site plan approval; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency for this Unlisted Action. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, house Chairperson CC: Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Engineer Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Water Authority NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transpor[ation File PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: October 9, 2007 James Dinizio, Zoning Board of Appeals Chair Jerilyn B Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson Appeal # 5906 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business In response to your memo dated September 27, 2007, the Planning Board (PB) has reviewed the revised site plan prepared byEugene G. Kempey, PE dated June 13, 2007 and last revised August 20, 2007 and offers the following comments: · We are site planning this project under the Building Department Notice of Disapproval dated December 27, 2005 and last amended on September 21, 2007. · The Planning Board, at their public meeting on September 10, 2007, initiated the SEQRA lead agency coordination for this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board expects to assume lead agency for this action at the next public meeting on October 15, 2007. In addkion the Phnning Board has retained the services of Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC for the environmental review of this project. · The applicant is currently revising the July 12, 2006 Traffic Engineering Assessment prepared by Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. to reflect the current proposed build out of the site. Once a copy of the traffic study has been submitted, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC may complete their review and submit their findings to the Phnning Board. · Prior to PB approval, this application will require the following approvals: Southold Town Building Inspector, Town Engineer, LWRP, ZBA, NYS DOT, NYSDEC and SCI)HS. · Many of the concerns of the Planning Board, as detailed in the attached July 11, 2006 memo to your Board, have been addressed in the current revised plan under review, however, the Planning Board is still in the process of their environmental review of this project. We hope these comments will be useful to the ZBA in its review of this appeal. Please contact this office should you have any questions or need anything further. Cc: Planning Board members File Enc: July 11, 2006 memo to ZBA Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork.net TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (631) 765-99t14 Tel. (631) 765-1809 MEMO TOWN Planning Board Jamos Dinizio, Jr.. Chairman Our Department has received and is reviewing the following application, and enclose copies of the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, and application with the applicant's latest map. The Planning Board may be involved under the site plan review steps under Chapter 100 (Zoning), and your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience. NAME TAX # / ZB__A BD NOD .VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE DATE DATE STAMPED GAMA PROP. 142-1-27, 5906 09/24/07 Bulk Schedule, 6/13/07 Eugene G. (formerly B Zone 100-102; 100- Kempey LPE Warex) 242A-side and front yard setbacks; 100- 103C-structure in excess of 60 ft on roadway (canopy) Your comments are appreciated by October 14, 2007. Thank you. Fried By:., Date Asslgned/~ssignment No. SC~ 100o I ~) ~PE~ T~ ~'i'rgN DE~ATION OF ~ B~D~G ~SPECTOR Telephone: NOTE: In addition ~ the a~W, pl~ ~mpl~* ~ow If appleton I~ ~lgn~ by appll~nt's aRo~, a~nt, arehlt~ bufld~r, eon~ct NameofRepr~entaflve:~,~. ~a~ for(~er, or ( )~her: Ple~e check box W spec~ who yo~ correspondence to be ~fmd to, from the a~o~e n~: ~ ApplicanffOwner(s), or ~Author~ed Representative, or E Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY TI:~ BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED MAP DATED and DENIED AN APPLICATIO~,~ D .A?ED . FOR: ~'Bnildmg Pernut [] Certificate of Occupancy [] Pre-Certificate of Occupancy [] Change of Use [] Permit for As-Built Construction BOther: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article, Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbe.r.s. Do not quote the code.) Article ~ Section ~ /~/, ~ ~unsecuon Type of A~peal. An Appeal is made for. g~A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. [] A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. [] Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section [] Reversal or Other A prior appeal [] has, B has not been made ~e with respect to this property~ UNDER Appeal No. __Year__. (Please be sure to research before completingtMs question or call our office for /Zz$; REASONs FOR APPEAL (n~.,.'!~onaI sheets may be used wlth t~re~arer's sienature): AREA VARIANCE REASONS: (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CIIARACTER o~ the neighborhood or a d ' etriment to nearby properties if granted, because: (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? ( )Yes, or ~o. Are there Covenants and Restrictions concerning this land: O NO. ~Yes (~lease furnish copy,. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the n$1ghborhood and the health, safety, and weffare of the community. Check this box ( ) IF A USE VARIANCE I$ BEING ~D PLEASE COMPLETE ~/g n a ~lr~-n~p ~ll"~'~o r A~h~i~e~l~J~gen~ Sworn to before me this /q ;/~ / /(Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) otary Public - J ~l~ktU~tA ·/iage 3 of 3 - Appeal Application Pat Il: REASONS FOR USE VARIANCE flf reauested): For Each and Every Permitted Use under the Zonjing Regulations for the Particular District Where the Project is Located (please consult your alforney before completing): 1. Applicant cannot realize a reasonable return for each and every permitted use under the zoning regulations fo[ the particular district where the pr°perh/is located, demonstrated by competent tinanclal evidence. The appllcanf CANNOT realize a REASONAIILE RETURN because: (describe' on a separate sheet). 2. The alleged hardship relating fo the property !s unique because: 3. The alleged hardship does not apply fo a substantial podion of the district or neighborhood because: 4. The request will not alter the essential characier of the neighborhood because: 5. The alleged hardship has not been self-created because: 6, This Is the minimum relief necessary, while at ihe same time preserving and prOtecting the character of the neighborhood, and the health, Safely and welfare of the community. (Please explain on a separate sheet if necessary.) i 7. The spirit of the ordinance will be observed, p~bllc safely and welfare will be secured, and substantial Justice will be done because: (Pleasejexplaln on a separate sheet jf necessmy.) Sworn to before me this_ (Notary ( ) Check thls box and complete PART A, : Questions on previous page fo apply AREA VARIANCE STANDARDS. (Please consult your attorney.) .Otherwise, olease proceed to the signature and notary area below. ;ecl~ e'~f Appellant or Aufhorlzed'~'nf nf must submit Authorization from Owner) ZBA App 9/30/02 WAREX TERMINAL CORP. AREA VARIANCE REASON Question Number 1 The project requires three variances from the Town of Southold Zoning Resolution. The first variance is from Article X, Section 100-102 for the reduction in allowable side yard setback width from 25 feet to 18 feet. This reduction in the minimum required side yard setback is not detrimental to either the character of the neighborhood or the nearby properties because there is no change to the existing side yard setback. All of the proposed construction in this area will be confined to the interior of the existing building at the site with no change to the existing structure along the side yard. The second variance is from Article III, Section 100-242 for the expansion of the canopy along Main Road and the subsequent reduction in the previously approved front yard setback from 11.5 feet to 8.33 feet. This reduction in the minimum required front yard setback is not detrimental to either the character of the neighborhood or the nearby properties because the expansion of the canopy is to reconfigure the existing canopy to improve the ascetic qualities of the canopy to conform to the requirements of the Town of Architectura) Review Board and make the site more visually pleasing to the surrounding neighborhood. The third variance is from Article X, Section 100-103, C. for the construction of a building with a street frontage greater that 60 feet. The 67 foot frontage along Main Road is not detrimental to either the character of the neighborhood or the nearby properties because there will be no change to the existing building frontage along Main Road. All of the proposed construction in this area will be confined to the interior of the existing building at the site with no change to the existing structure. The 67 foot frontage along Factory Avenue is not detrimental to either the character of the neighborhood or the nearby properties because there will only be a minor expansion of the existing canopy structure by ten feet to conform to the requirements of the Town of Southold Architectural Review Board and make the site more visually pleasing to the surrounding neighborhood. Question 2 The required benefit, the installation of a self car wash and convenience store, cannot be achieved by an other feasible method due to the Town of Southold Architectural Review Board requirements to reconfigure the canopy which requires the above mentioned front yard setback and building street frontage variances. Question 3 The reduction in the minimum required side yard is not substantial because there is no change to the existing side yard setback. All of the p~osed construction in this area ~,UG g ! 2007 will be confined to the interior of the existing building at the site with no change to the existing structure along the side yard. The reduction in the minimum required front yard setback is not substantial because the expansion of the canopy is to reconfigure the existing canopy to improve the ascetic qualities of the canopy to conform to the requirements of the Town of Architectural Review Board and make the site more visually pleasing to the surrounding neighborhood. The 67 foot frontage along Main Road is not substantial because there will be no change to the existing building frontage along Main Road. All of the proposed construction in this area will be confined to the interior of the existing building at the site with no change to the existing structure. The 67 foot frontage along Factory Avenue is not substantial because there will only be a minor expansion of the existing canopy structure by ten feet to conform to the requirements of the Town of Southold Architectural Review Board and make the site more visually pleasing to the surrounding neighborhood. Question 4 The reduction in the minimum required side yard has no adverse impacts on the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood or district because there is no change to the existing side yard setback. All of the proposed construction in this area will be confined to the interior of the existing building at the site with no change to the existing structure along the side yard. The reduction in the minimum required front yard setback has no adverse impacts on the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood or district because the expansion of the canopy is to reconfigure the existing canopy to improve the ascetic qualities of the canopy to conform to the requirements of the Town of Architectural Review Board and make the site more visually pleasing to the surrounding neighborhood. The 67 foot frontage along Main Road has no adverse impacts on the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood or district because there will be no change to the existing building frontage along Main Road. All of the proposed construction in this area will be confined to the interior of the existing building at the site with no change to the existing structure. The 67 foot frontage along Factory Avenue has no adverse impacts because there will only be a minor expansion of the existing canopy structure by ten feet to conform to the requirements of the Town of Southold Architectural Review Board and make the site more visually pleasing to the surrounding neighborhood. Question 5 The variances are required to conform to Town of Southold Architectural Review Board requirements. 7_007 / ' FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Warex Terminal Corp. 9945 Route 25 Mattituck, NY 11952 DATE: December 27, 2005 REVISED: December 28, 2005 RENEWED: April 26, 2006 AMENDED: August 2, 2006 RENEWED & AMENDED: July 17, 2007 AMENDED: August 2, 2007 AMENDED: August 21, 2007 ~> AMENDED: September 21, 2007 Please take notice that your application dated December 7, 2005 For permit to add a car wash bay for a car wash use and make additions and alterations to an existing gas station and convenience store use at Location of property: 9945 Route 25, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 142 Blockl Lot 2'7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this 24,829 square foot parcel in the B District, is not permittexl pursuant to Article X Section 100-102, which states; "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parkin? and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet, following the proposed construction, the building will have a side yard setback of+/- 15 feet. In addition, the extension of the existing canopy is not permitted pursuant to Article III, Section 100- 242, A., which states; "Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling, reconstruction or enlargement of a nonconforming building containing a conforming use, provided that such action does not create any new nonconformance or increase the degree of nonconformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings. On January 4, 1995, the applicant was issued a variance (~4290) to construct a canopy with an insufficient front yard setback of 11.5 feet. Following the proposed construction, the size of the canopy will be increased and is noted having an 8.33-foot front yard setback (from SR 25). Also, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-103, C., which statesl "A project shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than 60 linear feet of frontage on one street." Followinu the nroposed construction, the building will have +/-67.08 feet of frontage on Factory Avenue (canopy). In addition, the proposed car wash use requires special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Both proposed uses require site plan approval from the Southold Town Plannine Board. This Notice of Disapproval was amended on August 2~ 2006~ following the submission of a new site plan showing additional proposed work and on July 17~ 2007~ following changes to the orooosed o.roiect~and~on September 21~ 2007~ to make changes to the disapproval regardino_ the need for ~ so~otage varian~ Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A., PLANNING AMENDED LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2007 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 280 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on THURSDAY~ OCTOBER 1872007 1:25 P.M. GAMA PROPERTIES (formerly WAREX TERMINAL CORP.) #5906 as Amended. Requests for Variances under Sections 280-49 (100-I02), 280-122 (100-242A based on Zoning Interpretation #5038-Walz Application), and 280-50C (100-103C), and for a Special Exception for a car wash facility (Section 280-48B), based on the Building Inspector's amended September 21, 2007 Notice of Disapproval. The applicants propose to add a car wash with alterations to a building and to increase the length of the existing canopy. The reasons stated by the Building Inspector for disapproving the application for a building permit are: (1) following the proposed construction, the building will have a side yard setback at less than the code-required 25 feet; (2) following the proposed extension of the existing canopy, there will be an increase in the degree of nonconformance for the front yard setback from the Main Road - NYS Route 25; (3) following the proposed extension of the existing canopy, there will be an increase in size (as a single separate structure) that will exceed the code maximum of 60 linear feet of frontage on one street (Factory Avenue). Location of Property: CITGO Gas Station, Corner of Factory Avenue at 9945 Route 25 (a/ida Main Road), Mattituck; CTM 142-1-27. Zone District: B-General Business. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours and prior to the day of the hearing. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (631) 765-1809, or by email: Linda. Kowalskl~Town. Southold.ny. us. Dated: September 26, 2007. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS JAMES DINIZlO, JR., CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski 54375 Main Road (Office Location) EY MAP .LE AS NOTED TC 23.65 (S) BC X 24.70 BC 25.59 24.67 BC 24.31 BC 25.50 X 24.91 (LOT 27) X 25,28 :5.98 STOP CROSSWALK NYT343 26.95 EXISTING CURB CUT TO BI/ CONC WH X 26.92 o ~ WHITE LINE ~o 26.16 c0 TU R N I N G LANE o ~ 26.28 o DBL YELLOW LINE SITE PLAN FOR WAREX TERMINALS ( ~ 8' DIA. YN EL ,25.69 PROPO~D )A'R-iRO0~ ~ROPOSBD ~ CO UM (4) ] ' EL 24 I' (1¢) EL 96 X" 14'-11" I I PROPOSED CARWASH I _Iit_ "25'-s" FF EL 25.41)~ NIGHT BOX /l.n~E OF PROPO~I~) CANOPY ABOVE zLIN~ OF EXISTIN~ 24,94 (~) (5) BOLl kRD EXISTINO ~ (TYP) PUMP ~ CONCRETE PAD (11) J 2 .39 PROPOSED W.LB, ~ PROPOSED CONVENII~C~ STORE I L~kj 66.1' CONG. WALK pROPOSI3D STORA(~ AREA 1.6'¢ COVER 24.83 EL 24.87 1.6'¢ COVER ~'""' EL 24.67 ~X EL .I ~× EL 24.3' I 24.40 x''k'-- -- ' BC 3'¢ B~ 3'¢ COVEF EL 24.67 3'¢ COVER EL 24.48 3 El 1.6'¢ COVER EL 24.57 -TOG INLET EL. 23.92 2' 2' x CC EL 25.92 ] lOG 22.80 ~ CURB GUTTER \ \ \ \ \ \ ~-'~F~-E LINE MAI N ,w,,,,.,,.,,,,,,,, ROAD X~4.96 -- (S.R. 25) 23.25 25.05 l' BC 24.96 ~ BC 5'¢ COVER EL 24.79 14'-0" TC 25. 24.7 TC ~'¢ COVER 24.87 ¢ x 8' D. L.P, .75'¢ COVER EL 24.77 EL 24.91 COVER 5'¢ COVER EL 24.67 .75'¢ COVER I 5'¢ COVER EL 24.57 I EL 24.48 I I 5'¢ COVER ~x EL 24.56 24.40 1.6'¢ COVER EL 24.57 rTOG /INLET EL. EL 23.92 [] REFUSE c ,osu . C IOG BASE 22, TC 24.56 25) LIGHT EL 23.87-, 98.00 201-0" BC (4) \ \ \ \ \ 25.59 z 0 2524 TW 21.87 BW 19.57/ COVER EL 24.81 TW 21.8'6 BW 19.72_ ALL SITE INFORMATION IS BASED UPON A SURVEY DATED 02/16/06, JOB NO. 06013, BY: VOLLMUTH ~," BRUSH 2oo BLUE ~ BLUE POINT, 4.Y, 11715 tONUMENT SIGN WX16'H CONCRETE RETAINING \ TW WALl WALL CRNR 2.3'N 2.5'E UP WHITE LINE 23.41 DBL YELLOW LINE DBL YELLOW LINE 21.55 DSC CONSTRUCTION CORP. West Babylon. NY 1 ~, 704 rel. 631-321-7777 Fax 63 i-661-0486 /-c~ ~'~R 2z-,.',=,'.cm,~,~,v SCTM 1000-142-!-27 Case No 01-99P SEP 2 6 2007 '"~,~-- Seuthmd ~owa dated Jul'/ / , 2006 we are ro,~ubmiffir~ fo~r (4~ revi,~:l site plans ¢¢e have removed one curb ¢~Jt from Routa 25 as per the d?~$ira~Jlit¥ of the NYSDOT a~d the ; ,,,~n of [,:ou~nnJd (o mamta~r the historic and peaceful nature of th,% community as shown an ~qP-?'b W~ h;4ve added i~, aH nctes as required as shown On ~P-Zbl find leu! !4~ aerial photographs of the site and it~ environs. ~f ,'o.; cave ~t,"y 4u~ttons or rec~uire any additiof~at infomna[~on, 2teaae advise ~var~ Ramtochan PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Holl Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Ma/n Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SENT VIA FAX (631.661.0486 - 6 pages total) AND MAIL September 24, 2007 Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp 640 Sunrise t-fighway West Babylon, New York 11704 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Matfituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Bminess Dear Mr. Kamath: As discussed, the Planning Board referred the revised site plan to the New York State Department of Transportation for comments. NYSDOT responded via email and attached a copy of their July 7, 2006 letter addressed to you regarding the above referenced project, the NYSDOT site plan requirement checklist and the NYSDOT traffic impact study requirement checklist. NYSDOT, as stated in their response to this office, is requiting that you provide them with the following items in order for them to complete their review. · Six (6) sets of site plans that contain all of the info on the attached checklist · Four (4) copies of a limited Traffic Impact Study- see attached checklist · The plans should address comments in our previous letter- copy attached · Driveway median should be offset from existing curb line a minimum of four (4) feet The NYSDOT has informed this office that you must submit the necessarykems in order for them to complete their review of this proposed project. Please be aware it is the applicant's responsibility to obtain all necessary approvals from NYSDOT prior to ske plan approval. Please contact Mark Wolfgang at 631.952.7973 if you have any questions regarding NSYDOT requirements. Enc: july 7, 2006 letter addressed to you regarding the above referenced project NYSDOT site plan requirement checklist NYSDOT traffic impact study requirement checklist File Mark Wolfgang, Civil Engineer, New York State Department of Transportation Ford, Amy From: Sent: To: Subject: Mark Wolfgang [mwolfgang@dot.state.ny.us] Friday, September 21,2007 1:27 PM Ford, Amy NYSDOT Case 01-099P, Warex Project, NY 25, Mattituck 01-99p,doc site-w-checks&sign Tislwdrivewth ruche al notes. DOC... cks.doc Hi Amy, Thank you for sending us a copy of the revised plan. It is helpful but in order for us to perform a comprehnsive review and provide comments the applicant should provide us with the following items: - six (6) sets of site plans that contain all of the info on the attached checklist - four (4) copies of a limited Traffic Impact Study - see attached checklist - the plans should address comments in our previous letter - copy attached - d'way median should be offset from existing curb line a minimum of four (4) feet Once the applicant provides the requested info we can start our review. If you have any questions please call. Thanks & have a great weekend, Mark Mark D. Wolfgang Civil Engineer I Traffic Engineering and Safety Region 10 Telephone: (631) 952-7973 Mobil: (631) 978-1671 Fax: (631) 952-4967 July 7, 2006 Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp. 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Dear Mr. Kamath: Town of Southold June 22, 2006 Submission Proposed Site Plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road Site Plan Dated 11/22/05, Last Revision 5/30/06 Route 25, Southold SCTM 1000-142-1-27 Our Case No. 01-99P We are writing to advise you that the Town of Southold has informed us that you are proposing work at the subject site located on the northeast comer of Route 25 and Factory Ave. In order for you to initiate the Highway Work Permit process so we can provide a comprehensive review of this site please submit four (4) sets of plans that include all of the information noted on the attached checklist. The following items shall also be addressed by your submission: In recent years, many states have employed access management as a major technique to address conflicts between through traffic and that generated by developments. The goals of access management are to limit the number of access points, separate conflict points and remove turning traffic from through movements. New York State is utilizing this technique to minimize impacts to State highways. We recommend, therefore, that cross access to this site be obtained from adjacent properties. If this is not presently possible, it should be shown on the plans for implementation as part of future redevelopment. Work along this section of Route 25 was recently completed by the CVS opposite this site. As part of our review of the CVS site we recommended all access be removed from Route 25 as the site had access to the local road network. In the interest of public safety and increasing mobility along this busy corridor we recommend right turn ingress only for this site. The Route 25 access must be designed to promote that movement and the access radius shall be offset from the property line a minimum of five (5) feet as per our driveway policy. Please reference our Policy for access on our website at www.dot.state.n¥.us/traffic/safety/hwp/dwpolind.pdf so you can present us with a design that conforms to our policy requirements. Mr. Vivian Kamath July 7, 2006 Page 2 All traffic control signal equipment including underground conduit shall be shown on the plans. The following traffic signal notes shall also be included: a. The contractor shall be responsible for and shall replace all signal interconnect cable, detector cable, conduit and all underground accessory equipment damaged during construction. b. Prior to starting any work at this location, the contractor shall notify the New York State Department of Transportation that a tone-out of signal equipment is needed. c. All traffic signals shall be maintained in a traffic responsive operation and all interconnect, where existing, shall be maintained. The contractor shall pay a liquidated damages charge of $500.00 per calendar day if actuation and coordination is not maintained. A note shall be added to the plans requiring the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the Route 25 site frontage at the completion of construction. The plans appear to indicate on site runoff will enter the State highway ROW. Provisions shall be made to collect and contain all on site drainage. All proposed drainage features shall be submitted for our review along with the calculations supporting your proposal. 6. The plan must include the note "Repair existing shoulder, sidewalk and curbing as ordered by State Engineer." If applicable, a note shall be added to the plans stating "All sidewalk surfaces shall be given a slip resistant texture. A coarse broom finish perpendicular to the sidewalk slope is acceptable." 8. The ROW lines shall be clearly shown and called out on the plans. ROW markers shall be installed at the property limits along the State highway frontage and at any intermediary turning points along the State highway frontage in accordance with NYSDOT standard sheet M625-1R1. Please include the appropriate detail. 10. Any utility work proposed in State Highway right-of-way will require separate application and submission of plans (installation details, restoration details and Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan - all referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) to our Riverhead Maintenance facility. The applicant may contact Mr. Kevin Matthaei at (631) 727-1731 for further directions regarding Utility Highway Work Permit (HWP) applications. The applicant should be made aware that utility HWP issuance is subject to issuance of the HWP required for site work. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or 1495, whichever is farther south, north to Long Island Sound. Mr. Vivian Kamath July 7, 2006 Page 3 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachment CC~ Mr. Peter HanSs, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold Ms. Amy Ford, Senior Planner, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:SME CC: F. Pearson M. Wolfgang S. Fathi, Environmental File: Route 25, Mattituck SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS CJakECKLIST: X A. Location and dime~s of existing highway pavement, sidewalk, median, median openings, guide rail, utilities, signs (including size and texO, pavement markings, bus stops, overhead and underground traffic signal equipment, right-of-way lines, controlled access lines and property lines. X B. Existing and proposed buildings, appurtenances and drive-through windows. X C. Design features, referencing the latest edition of the NYS Standard Specifications, to be incorporated in proposed work: X 1. X 2. X 3. X 4. X 5. X 6. X 7. X Driveway pavement type and dimensions. Radii of driveway returns and other points of curvature. Driveway grades or profiles, indicating low point on private property. Angle of driveways relative to roadway center line. Dimensions of roadside control islands and driveway medians. Dimensions of curb and sidewalk relative to pavement edge. Details of internal traffic circulation, including proposed signs, pavement markings and traffic signal equipment. North arrow and scale on each applicable sheet. X D. Size, type and grade of existing and proposed drainage features. Plastic pipe is not permitted within State right-of-way. X E. Distance from each existing and proposed driveway to each adjacent driveway and cross street, including adjacent property lines and streets and driveways opposite the site. X Maintenance and protection of traffic plans. A Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan must be provided for work on Route 25. The plan must include the note "All lanes must be open to traffic between 10 AM and 3 PM. No lane closings are permitted on weekends or holidays. Nighttime lane closings will not be permitted without prior approval from the State Permit Inspector." X Traffic signal plans must be shown on a separate sheet including pavement markings, turn lanes, driveways, sidewalks and pedestrian ramps, crosswalks, buildings, poles, power supply, pullboxes, conduit, controller, head layout including face numbering, detection, right-of-way lines and signing. All work must be referenced to the latest edition of the NYS Standard Specifications. The following notes shall be included on the plans: Traffic Signal Notes: 1. The contractor shall be responsible for and shall replace all signal interconnect cable, detector cable, conduit and all underground accessory equipment damaged during construction. Prior to starting any work at this location, the contractor shall notify the New York State Department of Transportation that a tone-out of signal equipment is needed. Ali traffic signals shall be maintained in a traffic responsive operation and all interconnect, where existing, shall be maintained. The contractor shall pay a liquidated damages charge of $500.00 per calendar day if actuation and coordination is not maintained. Aerial photograph of the site and environs. Beginning and ending reference markers. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST: __ A. Hourly turning movement counts for each driveway intersection ~vith the State highway where a permit traffic signal is being requested for the 8 highest hours of an average day, indicating all future movements. __ B. Hourly turning movement counts for each adjacent signalized intersection on the State highway system for the 8 highest hours of an average day. __ C. Accident analysis using three years of current source document accident data, including details of accident history and collision diagrams. __ D. Morning, midday, evening and Saturday peak hour delay studies at each driveway intersection where a permit signal is requested. X E. Latest ITE Trip Generation Manual data for each land use, including code. X F. Capacity analyses using the latest HCM methodology, including comparative LOS tables and cross references to work sheets. __ G. Time-space diagrams. X H. Site plan, drawn to scale, indicating roadway and access improvements. __ I. Executive summary. __ J. Aerial photograph of the site and environs. __ K. Cost estimate of all mitigation improvements to the State highway system. For sites whose sole condition requiring a Traffic Impact Study is a proposed drive-through window, the following must be included: X 1. Queuingdnalysis. X 2. Morning, midday, evening and Saturdaypeak hour turning movement counts for each driveway intersection, indicating all future movements. X 3. ItemsE, FandHabove. For minor expansion of existing sites, Items 2 and 3 above must be included. This material must be prepared by a licensed professional engineer. tis.wpd 4/4/02 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND September 20, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, New York 11704 Proposed site phn for Warex Project 9945 IV'mN Road, Mattituc!g New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business Dear Mr. Kamath: Please be aware the Planning Board has received an estimate for the environmental planning review from Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC for the above referenced project. Attached is a copyof the estimated fee for this review. The Planning Board held a work session on September 10, 2007 and accepted this estimate, requiring the attached fee in order to complete the environmental review for this proposed application. Please review the estimate and submit payment in the amount of $1,500.00 endorsed to the Town of Southold. The Planning Board requires the payment to be submitted before approving the consultant to perform the review. Be aware, as stated in the estimate, review of supplemental information maybe result in additional fees. In addition, please forward nine (9) copies of the revised Traffic Engineering Assessment reflecting the current build out of the site to this office when available. Once received, a copyof the revised Traffic Engineering Assessment will be forwarded to Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC for their review. Please contact this office at 631.765.1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.n~ should you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, Senior Planner Eric.: September 7, 2007 estimate from Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC cc: File PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILY~ B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS iV[ARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND September 19, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mark Wolfgang New York State Department of Transportation Region Ten 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Wolfgang: Enclosed please find a revised site plan prepared byEugene Kempeydated June 13, 2007 and last revised August 20, 2007 for the above reference project. This site plan is for the proposed alteration of an existing gas station which will include the removal of the existing 3-bayservice station to expand the existing convenience store, expand the existing gas pump canopy and add a new car wash, where 1,146 sq. ft. is for the convenience store, 907 sq. ft. is for the car wash and approximately 3,434 sq. ft. is for the canopy including 12 parking spaces onske, on a .55-acre parcel in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e comer of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue, known as 9945 Main Road, in Mattimck. The previous referral was sent June 22, 2006 and a reply was dated June 28, 2006, however, the project description and plans, including access to the site, has been revised. The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for your concerns, comments and jurisdiction requirements. Thank you for your cooperation. Senior Planner Cc: File Enc.: 1 site plan prepared by Eugene Kempey dated June 13, 2007 & last revised August 20, 2007 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND September 11, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corporation 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, New York 11704 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~I~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hail Axmex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Warex Terminals Corporation Located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue, known as 9945 Main Road, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: General Business (B) Dear Mr. Kamath: The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, September 10, 2007, adopted the following resolution: WHEREAS, this site plan is for the proposed alteration of an existing gas station which will include the removal of the existing 3-bay service station to expand the existing convenience store, expand the existing gas pump canopy and add a new car wash, where 1,146 sq. ft. is for the convenience store, 907 sq. ft. is for the car wash and approximately 3,434 sq. ft. is for the canopy including 12 parking spaces onsite, on a .55-acre parcel in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue, known as 9945 Main Road, in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, house Chairperson cc: Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Engineer Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Water Authority NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation File PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND September 11,2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act- SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed are a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Warex Terminals Corporation 9945 Main Road, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: General Business (B) Requested Action: This site plan is for the proposed alteration of an existing gas station which will include the removal of the existing 3-bay service station to expand the existing convenience store, expand the existing gas pump canopy and add a new car wash, where 1,146 sq. ft. is for the convenience store, 907 sq. ft. is for the car wash and approximately 3,434 sq. ft. is for the canopy including 12 parking spaces onsite, on a .55- acre parcel in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue, known as 9945 Main Road, in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-142-1-27 SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( ) Type II (X) Unlisted Contact Person: Amy Thiel, Senior Planner (631) 765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Lead Agency Coordination Request Page Two September 11, 2007 Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: For further information on this project, please feel free to contact this office. Very truly yours, ouse Chairperson CC; Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Engineer Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Water Authority NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation File NEL~(:3N, pi~pl:: ,~ ~F, li-II~I FAX COVER SHEET Date: Am3' Thtil- To~n of Southold Fa.r: ¢63D A~y Marcis~,n-Admi~atlve Asai~t C~o, 9945 Ma~ Nc, of Pages: ~ (including aoveN Dear Ms, Theil, Please find the att&ched proposal sent to >ou per Cm'ie O:Farrcll's request. hesitate to contact me ~:ould you have an)' quefftions or need flier, her assistance. Sincerely. ,MN<,' Mare~yn Nc:lson Pops & ¥ oorNg LLC 572 Walt V~%un~ Road Melville, NWl ~747 (63 i ) 42%$665 '*2 [ 5 ,NELEIC]N~ PI2}P't~ ~. VCIOlalHI~, LLC Amy T~el Toxtm of $outhold Tow~ Ball.~aaex ~a375 Sram Roule 25, P.O, Box 1179 $o~thold, New York 11971 .$~pt~nl~r 7, 2007 $1,500.00 6, R~ri~w su1~pl~m~ll i~or~aiort aabm/~l by th~ ~rpllcsm in mpPo~ of tho a~ ~, Plol~ro~ teooli~td~ dlm~a~ion of ~mmce (if r~'~tgd bY B°atd), you for ~e opportunity to assist cm this pmj~t. Plea.m f~l ffm to ~ ~ ~u ~ my ~O~, Voo s, I,I,C /foP?],,.'", ,,, GENERAL TEI~M~S ,~D CONDrYIO~$ IN1T]AL ~v _~L 2007 $190.00 $!50,00 $150.00 $130,00 1i30.00 $125.0~ $1 [0.00 SI00.00 $ 90.00 S gS.O0 $ 80,00 $200.00 $185.00 5175.00 $170.00 $150,00 $145,00 $i30.00 $125.00 $130.00 $125.00 $120.00 $105.00 $10530 $100.0~ $ $ 85.00 $ 90,00 $ 70.00 $1 tO.O0 $ 8~.00 $ 70.00 $375.00 $215,00 $260.00 $~0.00 $300.00 5300.00 $390.00 i~lccia~ Envi~;:~n~n:~l $ci~t~s~Jv. Mgr ~sociate P~jecl M~g~r 5em or $emor S~,eyo: Swact~al Engh~r S~mor Engm~er ~ ~:knic S~or S~we~ E~ee~ I~c~gc~ S~v~' Proj~t Coo~matm' Pxoce~mg Cl~k Draftsmen Semor A&n~stmuve Co~q Tes'~ony }k~ia Party 2 M~n (il*b~m I~te) Yi~ld P~' 3 M~ (Sub'a~n Rate) Field Pray ~ Mm (Consult~a Rate) Field P~ 2 Mm, (itea~T Rate) F~eid P~/3 Men (Hea%' ~te) P. ~5 TOT~L P. ~6 Ford, Amy From: Sent: To: Subject: Ford, Amy Thursday, September 06, 2007 11:45 AM 'mdabreo@nelsonpope.com' Warex Project Hi Marissa - As discussed, ! have attached some information which might be of help to you. Please give me a call if you have any additional questions. The project description is as follows: This site plan is for the proposed alteration of an existing gas station which will inclu& the removal of the existing 3-bay service station to expand the existing convenience store, expand the existing gas pump canopy and add a new car wash, where 1,146 square feet is for the convenience store, 907 square feet is for the car wash and approximately 3,434 square feet is for the canopy including 12 parking spaces onsite, on a .55 acre parcel in the General Business zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e comer of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue known as 9945 Main Road in Mattituck. SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27. Again our fax is 631.765.3136 and our phone number is 631.765.1938 - please give me a call ff you have any questions. I will mail a copy of the proposed plan to you and other necessary information. If you can fax an estimate to me I will present it to the Planning Board on Monday at the work session and send a follow up letter to you if they approve the estimate. Thank you for your help! Thanks, Amy Thiel 142-1-27 Warex Rendering Ware:< Site Visit Warex Site Visit Warex Site Visit Warex Site Visit Project aerial .... Aug.22.07.jpg 8-30-06003.Jp... 8-30-06004.jp... 8-30-06009,jp... 8-30-06010.jp... Warex Site Visit Warex Site visit Warex Site Visit 8-30-06011.jp... 8-30-06012.jp,.. 8-30-06013.jp... PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 FAX COVER LETTER To: Vivian Kamath Fax Number. 631.661.0486 From: AmyThiel ~ No. of Pages: 3 (total) Date: 5 September 2007 SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Re: Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York Please find enclosed the ARC minutes from August 23, 2007 for your review. Please contact this office should you have any questions. Thank you. Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee Minutes 4:00PM, August 23, 2007 Town Hall Conference Room Members Present: Chairman Sanford Hanauer; Ural Talgat; Nicholas Planamento; Elizabeth Thompson; Ron McGreevy; Joseph Lee; Herbert Ernest; Tom Wickham, Town Board Member; Amy Thiel, Planning Board Staff; Elizabeth Cantrell, Secretary. The minutes for the July 26, 2007 meeting were approved. Pre-Submission Applications: PURITA WINERY SCTM ~1000-51-3-4.3 Nancy Steelman of Samuels & Steelman presented the application. Ural Talgat & Amy Thiel recused themselves of this application. APPROVED: The committee members fully endorse this application as it is shown today. MOTION MADE: Elizabeth Thompson; SECOND: Herbert Ernest Revisited Applications: SPARKLING POINTE, LLC. SCTM #1000-59-10-1 Nancy Steelman of Samuels & Steelman presented the application. Ural Talgat recused himself of this application. APPROVED: The committee members fully endorse this application as it is shown today. MOTION MADE: Sanford Hanauer; SECOND: Nicholas Planamento WAREX PROJECT SCTM #1000-142-1-27 APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS: Low shrub Juniper in lieu of the Hemlock; the canopy columns should match the building pilasters by adding the matching base and capitol; the two dog dormer roofs should be a gable style roof rather than a hip style roof. The committee recommends the applicant consider a redesign of the street-front sign to be more similar in design as the Hess gas station in Southampton on Montauk Highway. MOTION MADE: Ural Talgat; SECOND: Herbert Ernest; Ail in Favor New Applications: GROUP FOR THE EAST END OFFICE SCTM #1000-62-1-4 Kate Schertel, Special Assistant to the President, presented the application. APPROVED: The committee members fully endorse this application as it is shown today. The committee members recommend putting traditional lighting fixtures on the building rather than the modern lighting fixtures. The parking area lighting fixtures can be modern or traditional and is at the applicant's discretion. Ail lighting is to be Dark Sky compliant. The type of bulb recommended for the lighting fixtures is metal halide. MOTION MADE: Ural Talgat; SECOND: Elizabeth Thompson A motion was made to close the meeting at 6:20PM. Ail in favor. 2 PLANNn~G BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOVgNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MARLING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector James A. Richter, Town Engineer From: Amy Thiel, Senior PlanneL.~ Date: August 27, 2007 Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Matfimck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan. Please be aware the original referral regarding this application was dated July 22, 2006. The site plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. The enclosed site plan is for your review and records and does not need to be retumed to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: File Enc.: 1 site plan prepared by Eugene Kempeydated June 13, 2007 and last revised August 20, 2007 AUG 2 9 2007 Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee Minutes 4:00PM, August 23, 2007 Town Hall Conference Room Members Present: Chairman Sanford Hanauer; Ural Talgat; Nicholas Planamento; Elizabeth Thompson; Ron McGreevy; Herbert Ernest; Tom Wickham, Town Board Member; Amy Thiel, Planning Board Staff; Elizabeth Cantrell, Secretary. The minutes for the July 26, 2007 meeting were approved. Pre-Submission A~plications: PURITA WINERY SCTM %1000-51-3-4.3 Nancy Steelman of Samuels & Steelman presented the application. Ural Talgat & Amy Thiel recused themselves of this application. APPROVED: The committee members fully endorse this application as it is shown today. MOTION MADE: Elizabeth Thompson; SECOND: Herbert Ernest Revisited A~lications: SPARKLING POINTE, LLC. SCTM #1000-59-10-1 Nancy Steelman of Samuels & Steelman presented the application. Ural Talgat recused himself of this application. APPROVED: The committee members fully endorse this application as it is shown today. MOTION MADE: Sanford Hanauer; SECOND: Nicholas Planamento SCTM #1000-142-1-27 APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS: Low shrub Juniper in lieu of the Hemlock; the canopy columns should match the building pilasters by adding the matching base and capitol; the two dog dormer roofs should be a gable style roof rather than a hip style roof. The committee recommends the applicant consider a redesign of the street-front sign to be more similar in design as the Hess gas station in Southampton on Montauk Highway. MOTION MADE: Ural Talgat; SECOND: Herbert Ernest; All in Favor New A~lications: GROUP FOR THE EAST END OFFICE SCTM #1000-62-1-4 Kate Schertel, Special Assistant to the President, presented the application. APPROVED: The committee members fully endorse this application as it is shown today. The committee members recommend putting traditional lighting fixtures on the building rather than the modern lighting fixtures. The parking area lighting fixtures can be modern or traditional and is at the applicant's discretion. All lighting is to be Dark Sky compliant. The type of bulb recommended for the lighting fixtures is metal halide. MOTION MADE: Ural Talgat; SECOND: Elizabeth Thompson A motion was made to close the meeting at 6:20PM. Ail in favor. DSC CONSTRUCTION CORP. 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Tel. 631-321-7777 Fax 631-661-0486 August 23, 2007 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, NY 11952 Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee RE: SCTM: DATE: 1000-142-1-27 July 26th, 2007 ARC Meeting Warex Proiect: Regarding the conditional approval, pending the submitted revised plan; 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. We have shown on the rendering the doggy dormers on the rendering to matching the elevations as per the site plan. We have also adjusted the windows from the arched shaped to the square shape on the rendering, and have also specified them on the elevations. We have redesigned the cupola to match the existing, as well as maintaining the original cupola as best as possible. We have matched the design of the columns supporting the canopy with the pilasters attached to the building. We have shown the pattern of the cultured stone on the elevations, and will decide on a suitable color during construction. We have eliminated the white band around the canopy on the elevations. As per the site plan SP-Zb, and SP-Zbl we have shown and denoted the landscaping. We have also updated the front ~levatibn to show a split window with the grills being on top portion of the wind?W,~'~ilow for si{~nage and a clear view into the store. This is also mimicked in the transom u 31e door entrance. Attached p!e,,~se find in jp signage that will remain. ~?/~ ~' Cgards, - ~ ~-'"'""Evan Ramlochan DSC CONSTRUCTION CORP. 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Tel. 631-321-7777 Fax 631-661-0486 Figure I Figure 1: Signage for Warex looking northwest from the adjacent parking area. Main rd. is to the left of this sign, and Factory Avenue is behind this sign. Submission Without a Cover Letter Subject: SCrM#: ~ooo- I ¢--Z - I - 2_ ~ .57 rT~ .P' L Pr~ ~. l'u,.: AUG 2 7 2007 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southo]d, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 FAX COVER LETTER To: Vivian Kamath Fax Number. 631.669.1193 From: Amy Thiel No. of Pages: ~ (total) Date: 15 August 2007 SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Re: Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Matfituck, New York Please find enclosed the ARC minutes from July 26 2007 for your review. Please be aware the next ARC meeting is scheduled for August 23, 2007 at 4:00 p.m. As discussed yesterday, please submit one (1) map with complete dmlnage design and calculations for review by the Town Engineer. Please contact this office should you have anyquestions. Thank you. Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee Minutes 4=00p.m., July 26, 2007 Town Hall Meeting Hall Members Present: Chairman Sanford Hanauer; Ural Talgat; Nicholas Planamento; Elizabeth Thompson; Ron McGreevy; Herbert Ernest; Joseph Lee; Elizabeth Cantrell, Secretary. The minutes for the June 21, 2007 meeting were approved. Revisited Applications: WAREX PROJECT SCTM #1000-142-1-27 Vivian Kamath & Evan Ramlochan were the representatives for this project. CONDITIONAL APPROVAL pending a revised plan be submitted showing the dog dormer windows match the design of the first floor windows, redesign the gable on the dog dormers, redesign the cupola, match the design of the columns on the canopy to the columns on the building, submit color and pattern of stone, eliminate the white band on the canopy, state the types of proposed trees along the street front, submit a drawing of the street front Citgo sign. The representatives were given the option to use ~storefront" style or the traditional divided light style for the windows and doors as they were shown on the plans today. MOTION MADE: Ural Talgat; SECOND: Herbert Ernest; Ail in Favor A memo will be created to the Planning Board on the concerns and importance of Planning Department staff attending Architectural Review Committee meetings. Elizabeth Thompson will write letters to Edvin Stromsten from the AIA Peconic Chapter of the American Institute of Architects responding to his request for a letter of endorsement and the proposed Institute for Environmental Design. A motion was made to close the meeting at 5:50p.m. Ail in favor. Town of Southold Architectural Review Committee Minutes 4=00p.m., July 26, 2007 Town Hall Meeting Hall Members Present: Chairman Sanford Hanauer; Ural Talgat; Nicholas Planamento; Elizabeth Thompson; Ron MS~A~, Herbert Ernest; Joseph Lee; Ellzabe~h..~.r~t~, ~ecretary. The minutes for the June 21, ~ Revisited A~lications: ed. 00-142-1-27 tatives for WAREX PROJECT Vivian Kamath & Evan Raml this project. COnDiTiONaL PP OW , pendi ?. a_a bmitted showing the dog dormer ~in~w~-~at-~T~'}[e design of the first floor windows, redesign the gable on the dog dormers, redesign the cupola, match the design of the columns on the canopy to the columns on the building, submit color and pattern of stone, eliminate the white band on the canopy, state the types of proposed trees along the street front, submit a drawing of the street front Citgo sign. The representatives were given the option to use "storefront" style or the traditional divided light style for the windows and doors as they were shown on the plans today. MOTION MADE: Ural Talgat; SECOND: Herbert Ernest; Ail in Favor A memo will be created to the Planning Board on the concerns and importance of Planning Department staff attending Architectural Review Committee meetings. Elizabeth Thompson will write letters to Edvin Stromsten from the AIA Peconic Chapter of the American Institute of Architects responding to his request for a letter of endorsement and the proposed Institute for Environmental Design. A motion was made to close the meeting at 5:50p.m. Ail in favor. Eugene G. Kempe y, P.E. 640 Sunrise Highway, West Babylon, NY 11704 T (631) 321-7777 F (631) 6614)486 July 30, 2007 Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ATTN: Amy Thiel RE: Warex Terminals Site Plan - Southold Town transportation Commission comments. 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-141-01-27 Zoning District: B Dear Mrs. Thiel, Transmittal herewith, for your review and approval, are four (4) copies of the amended site plan drawings numbered SP-Zb on the above referenced project. These drawings reflect a change to the curb cut along Factory Avenue we have developed a slightly different aspect to our curb cut proposal for Factory Avenue. We have included a landscape strip to prohibit any cars entering the car wash entrance from crossing over to the gas station side. I have also added in the dimensions and the radii of the curb arcs for the tum around into the self service car wash which is the standard turn around for a large car. Thank you for your consideration and understanding4, Sincerely, Evan Ramlochan Architectural Consultant Page 1 of 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southald, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 17,2007 DSC Construction Corp. Mr. Vivian Kamath 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Re~ Warrex Terminals Site Plan - Southold Town Transportation Commission comments. 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-141-01-27 Zoning District B Dear Mr. Kamath, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated July 6, 2007 from the Southold Town Transportation Commission. The Planning Board held a work session on July 16, 2007 to review the enclosed letter and agreed to accept the comments as submitted. Please review the enclosed comments. Please revise the site plan as required based on the comments of the Town Transportation Commission. For convenience prior to revising the site plan you may submit a draft version with hand drawn notes of proposed changes for review. This can be completed prior to submitting the formal changes to the Planning Department. Please indicate in writing if the proposed changes will be incorporated to satisfy the concerns. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765 - 1938 between the hours o f 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. urs, Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. (Transportation Commission letter dated July 6, 2007) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFI~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southald, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Date: July 13, 2007 To: From: Re: Architectural ReviewCommittee e~_~ Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Review Re-visit of Warrex Terminals project in response of June 21, 2007 meeting. Dear Reviewer; The site plan revision prepared by Eugene G. Kempey, PE dated June 13, 2007 and last revised July 13, 2007 is being submitted for review comments in response to the ARC meeting on June 21, 2007. We request that this be placed on the agenda for July 26, 2007. Below is site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Warrex Terminals 06 NYS Route 25 in Mattituck. SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: B This site plan is for the proposed re-construction of a gas station in order to remove the existing automotive service station, expand the existing convenience store, reconstruct the existing gas pump canopy and add a car wash, with a total build out of 3,168 sq. ft. including a change in parking from 5 existing parking spaces to 12 parking spaces, on .55 acres in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue known as 9945 Main Road in Mattituck. SCTM#: 1000-142-1-27. In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan with architectural plan elevations. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Eugene G. Kempey, PE dated June 13, 2007 and last revised July 13, 2007 SOUTHOLD TRANSPORTATION COM}IISSION Town Hall 53095 Main Road Phone (631) 765-1.938 So~thold, NY 11971-0959 Fax 631 765-3136 TO: Ms. Amy Thiel FROM: DATE: RE: Senior Planner Neboysha R Brashich Chairman July 6, 20O7 Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Initially, the Commission reviewed subject project proposal twice at its July 31 and August 28, 2006 meetings. Another review was held regarding the recent project revision on June 25, 2007. Generally speaking, the project looks better than in the previous submission. However, the Commission continues to be concerned regarding the size of the cut on Factory Avenue and the ensuing safety issues should the project be approved. Some concern was voiced also regarding the turn around radius at the car wash. As the Planning Board is aware, NYS Route 25 is a designated New York State Scenic Road. Hence, any proposed structural modifications and/or landscaping should take this into account. We understand that a new roof over the gas pumps is being considered. In thc final review of the project, please ensure that this is esthetically pleasing and that the landscaping at the comer should be low profile in order to facilitate S!gl~fling dis~eli. -- EQ 478091124 .. 1 2345 e~89~ ~EXPRE~ ~UNITED ST~TES POSTaL $£RVIC£ ® Mailing Label Post OfficeToAddressee D3PM Mailing Label t,,l~be111-B, March 2QO4 Post OfficeTo Addressee DSC CONSTRUCTION CORP TEL.:(631) 321 -7777 FAX.:(631) 661-0486 WEST BABYLON, N.Y. 11704 Southold Transportation Commission Southold Town Hall Present: Neb Brashich, Margaret Brown, Frank Field, Tom Fox, Ruth Oliva, Tom Wickham, Capt. Martin Flatley, Jamie Richter, Pete Harris, Supt. of Hwys; Visitors Freddie Wachsberger, Jody Adams, Commission Membership: Neb spoke to Michelle Zaloom about continuing on the Transportation Commission and requested that if she is too busy to attend regular meetings, perhaps she should submit her resignation. SEEDS U_~xlate: Tom Neely, Chairman of the East End Transportation Council went to the Town Board meeting August 22 to present the executive summasy of the SEEDS initiative. He will make this presentation to each of the five East End towns and many of the villages. Each town will be asked to sign an intermunicipal memorandum of understanding. This will be a non-binding consensus and will make it possible to address common area-wide problems such as transportation, traffic and land use issues, and ambulance and police jurisdictions, among other things. In order to work efficiently, a working group needs to be formed with representatives from each town and village board. Tom Wickham, Neb Brashich and possibly Mark Terry will mpresant Southold. Tom Wickham expressed concern that authority is apparently given to the Supervisors and Mayors rather than to the Town Boards. He thinks it should be specified that Town Boards are part of the process. He would like the Memorandum of Understanding to be amended to that effect and will take this amendment to the Town Board and also try to get a Board resolution to sign the Memorandum of Understanding. Orient Causeway Pro_iect Status Report: Jamie talked to the consultant who has all the DEC information. He will talk to DOT to see what else needs to be done. The final report is expected by Labor Day weekend. The report will detail what the project will entail, where the lines will go, what it would cost, and it will look into potential grant funding, whether state or federal. Town Orientation/Interp_ mtive Signage Pro_iect Update: Neb sent a draft Agreement and Town Board Resolution to the Town Board to accept the $200,000 SAFETEA-LU grant for the interpretive signage project. In his cover memo, Neb reported that the commission recommends the Board's approval of the agreement and resolution. County Road 48 Roundabouts (2): We have not heard anything about funding these. The traffic light at Westphalia would be temporary. Neb suggested that we go to the Town Board specifically to discuss the many positive aspects of roundabouts, including inviting the DOT roundabout expert from Albany to come down and address the safety, traffic calming, and traffic flow benefits resulting from roundabouts in difficult intersections. Management Plan - Long Island North Shorn Heritage Area: A culmination of a 4-year effort (with no representatives from the East End) resulted in a plan reaching from Great Neck to Orient. The project requires that all the Towns participate. Neb submitted a memo that the Commission approves, and also the North Pork Promotion Council approves. This plan fits very well with Southold general concept and progress made thus far: North Fork Scenic Corridor, a Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan, and the Town Orientation/Interpretive Signage Project. The Town Board is urged to approve the sample resolution in support of this plan. Warex Project. Main Road. Mattituek: Because of safety and congestion issues, the Commission does not recommend the changes suggested by the Citgo station in Mattituck. No Parkin_e on Latham Lane: A request was made by Doug Fleming of Orient for "No Parking" signs to be placed on Latham Lane. For the request to be implemented, them must be a public heating and then approval by the Town Board. The Commission would like input from the Police Department and would then be guided by input from the hearing. Five Town Rural Transit U.txtate: Margaret reported that 5TRT is still waiting to hear about funding for its feasibility study. ~: The bus shelter project is still waiting for easements in Greenport and East Marion. Neb wants to get this finished within the fiscal year. Jamie will report at the next meeting. New Business: Tom Wickham brought up the Hamlet Stakeholders. There are eight hamlets, all trying to define more clearly how each hamlet should grow, with halo areas, transfer of development and open space preservation. He thinks there should be a "mini-master plan" for each hamlet to have a planning framework, especially for roads, and to avoid sprawl. Transportation and traffic are becoming the drivers of what happens in hamlets and hamlet design. The Town Master Plan is not adequate to address The next meeting will be Monday September 25, 2006 at 10 AM, Southold Town Hall. Respectfully submitted, Margaret H; Brown PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'~ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 5, 2007 Vivian Kamath DSC Comtruction Cow 640 Sunrise I-~ghway West Babylon, New York 11704 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituctg New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business Dear Mr. Kamath: As discussed and as requested bythe Building Department, please contact the Building Department to complete the necessary application/paperwork required to obtain a revised Notice of Disapproval. A revised Notice of Disapproval is necessary to determine if any approval is required from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Please forward a copy of the revised/amended Notice of Disapproval to this office upon receipt. Please contact this office at 631.765.1938 should you have any questions or need anything further. File Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY HAND DELIVERED June 22, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Neboysha Brashich Southold Transportation Committee 175 Emory Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business Dear Mr. Brashich: Enclosed please find a site plan application and one (1) site plan (SP-Zb) prepared by Eugene Kempey dated June 13, 2007 for the above reference project. This site plan is for the proposed re-construction of a gas station in order to remove the existing automotive serAce station, expand the existing convenience store, reconstruct the existing gas pump canopy and add a carwash, with a total build out of 3,168 sq. ft. including a change in parking from 5 existing parking spaces to 12 parking spaces, on .55 acres in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the rYe comer of NYS Road 25 and FactoryAvenue known as 9945 Main Road in Mattkuck SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27. The enclosed site phn and subsequent information is being referred to you for your review and recommendations. We respectfully request this be added to the June 25, 2007 agenda of the Southold Transportation Committee. If possible, please return the site plan to either myself or Bruno at the meeting on Monday. Thank you for your cooperation. Since~ly, Cc: File Planning Board Enc.: 1 site plan (SP-Zb) prepared byEugene Kempey dated June 13, 2007 EXPRE Mailing Label Post OfficeTo Addressee SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (631)-765-9015 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 JAM IE.RICHTER~TOWN.SOLr~. IJOI~D.N_Y_.U ~ _ _ ' OCT WARE3e~ite~Ptan--- (P~eliminarY) 0045 Main Road, Mattituck, NY SGTM #: 1000-142-01-27 As per a request from your office, I have reviewed a conceptual site plan for the above referenced project. This project includes the construction of a new Car Wash and the renovation of the existing Gas Station & Convenience Store. This site plan has been prepared by the office of Jonathan Huttick, Architect and has a revision date of 6/28/06. Please consider the following: This conceptual plan is based on the assumption that the adjacent property owner would be receptive to a lot line change or easement that would reduce the overall size or use of their property. It is recommended that a letter of intent or commitment from this adjacent property owner be obtained pdor to giving this concept sedous consideration. (A) If this property swap is to be approved by the adjacent property owner, the Planning Board should also review the resulting changes and/or modifications to the adjoining parking lot. This would require the submission of plans to indicate the layout of existing parking spaces and it should show how these spaces and related traffic lanes would be modified. It is understood that this Site Plan is a preliminary conceptual plan. The scope of this proposed concept would indicate that this project should be considered a major renovation. Therefore, any and all existing infrastructure should be required to meet current standards. This item should include the locations of all underground storage tanks. In addition, copies of all current permits issued by the Suffolk County Health Department that would acknowledge and/or approve of the existence of all underground storage tanks at this location, both existing and/or proposed, should be submitted to the Planning Board for review. NY State DOT Curb Cuts should be required for this project. Please note, Items have been shown in the State ROW that may not be approved by the DOT. Drainage calculations will be required. In addition, any and all existing drainage systems will need to be certified as to size and location before it will be considered part of the proposed drainage design. I have seen several versions of preliminary plans for the proposed improvements to this site. With regard to traffic Safety on Factory Ave and State Route 25, this current scheme is considered the better alternative from all of the proposals submitted to date. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. cc: Peter Harris //ames A. Richter, R.A. (Superintendent of Highways) PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L, TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: James Richter, Town Engineer Frorrr AmyFord, Senior Plarmer~ Date: 24 October 2006 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business Please find enclosed a revised/sketch site plan for the above referenced project. The applicant has proposed purchasing property from the adjoining parcel to allow for better circulation for the proposed car wash, however, this will require a lot line change. Also, please note the proposed plan shows a reduction in retail use. Please also find attached a collection of photos from our site visit with New York State Department of Transportation on August 30, 2006 to better assist you in your review. After preliminary discussions with the Planning Board, I will draft a letter to the applicant highlighting some of the site plan issues. Any comments you are able to provide would be greatly appreciated. SOUTHOLD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Town Hail I P.O. Box I179 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971-0959 I Phone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 TO: Ms. Amy Ford Senior Planner FROM: Neboysha R Brashich Chairman DATE: RE: September 15, 2006 Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Further to your letters dated June 22 and July 20, 2006, the Commission reviewed thc subject project proposal twice at its July 31 and August 28 meetings. The Commission continues to be concerned regarding the ensuing congestion and safety on this site should the project be approved.Our con,cluston' ~s_' to be recommended. ~'~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES August 3, 2006 4:00 p.m. Town Hall Meeting Hall Present were: Chairman Sanford Hanauer, members Joseph "Skip" Lee, Ronald McGreevy, Howard Meinke, Nicholas Planamento, Ural Talgat, Elizabeth- Thompson, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Bruno Semon, Senior Planner Amy Ford, ARC Secr-etary Linda Randolph, and project representatives. The minutes of the July 13, 2006 meeting were accepted. Motion: Ural; Second: Elizabeth. Copies of the meeting agenda were circulated. Revisited Applications: Peconic Recycling & Transfer SCTM: 1000-95-2-7 Recommendations: Resubmit. Applicant to go back to architect to further break down visual scale of building elevations; suggest using horizontal bands, colors, striping and panel doors. In addition, landscaping (combination of native evergreen and deciduous) without berm. Colors: sage brush & tan and evergreen roof OK. Motion: Ural; Second: Elizabeth. · Warex Project 2006 SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 Applicant not present at meeting. Recommendation: Redesign canopy and color based on Hess plan from 2-3 years ago. Suggest applicant look at Hess Station in Southampton and/or Easthampton for design. Motion: Sandy; Second: Elizabeth. New Applications: Shinn Vineyards (Pre-submission: SCTM: 1000-100-4-3.1 existing potato barn) In favor of project. Note that it is advertised as a winery. Recommendations: Continue to pick up colors & detailing from existing buildings and add to potato barn. Suggest using cross-gabling, dormers, cupolas, false doors/windows. Add landscaping, identify trees and sizes. Bring photos of all four sides, signage, lighting cuts. It should also be noted that construction work has started on the potato barn. Motion: Ural; Second: Elizabeth. Cingular Wireless/MGH Enterprises SCTM: 1000-15-9-8 Flagpole approved with following conditions: Color - white. Illuminate from ground 365 days/year from sunset to sunrise. Gold globe and red beacon light atop pole. Motion: Ural; Second: Howard. ARC Meeting Minutes Page Two August3,2006 Sandy Hanauer suggested ARC members should meet at the 4:30 p.m. August 24 Work Session of the Planning Board to discuss the ARC's role in dealing with "as built" structures. Ural Talgat commended the work of Planning Dept. staff members Bruno, Amy and Linda in cooperation with the ARC (getting electronic information to the Committee Members). Elizabeth Thompson suggested having a copy of "Barns of the Nodh Fork" available to applicants as a reference. The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. ARC Secretary Eugene G,. Kempey, P. E. 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, New York 11704 August 3, 2006 The Architectural Review Board Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York Attn. Ms. Any Ford Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith, for your review and approval, is our revised rendering addressing your comments on our July 13, 2006 presentation to the Board on the reference project. In addition, this transmittal contains the cuts sheet for the under canopy lighting fixtures, the metal canopy and roof panels, the building's stucco finish, and the paint colors for the window and canopy columns. In should be noted that there will be no changes to the existing signing at the site. //~ If~xhav~7~y questions or require any additional information, please advise. ~m~ H ~A?d)-COAT COLORED & DECORATIVE COATINGS BY~DER-OXYDRO, ... Page 1 of 5 OXYDRO~ 1t4C. Hard-Coat Colored Stu, & Decorative Coating Render Your Home Flame-Resistant - Build Masonry! From stick frame construction to traditional concret masonry unit construction and forms in between, Si Oxydro provides simple solutions for Hard-Coat St & Decorative Coatings. Sider-Oxydro's decorative coatings are strong & d~ integrally colored and easy-to-apply. They include http://www.sider-oxydro.com/decorative_coatings.htm 8/3/2006 HARD-COAT COLORED STU~ & DECORATIVE COATINGS BY~ER-OXYDRO, ... Page 2 of 5 Clicker pour info en: FRAN(~AIS Click aqui para informaqfio em Portugu~s do Sideral 2000 next generation of colored stucco, traditional Hard-t Stucco products and cement-based paints. A few of featured benefits using Sider-Oxydro's decorative coatings include: Hard-Coat, Cement-Based for 'Old- World' Renderings Pre-Mixed, Integral Custom Colors Water Repellent Yet Breathable Replacement products for EIFS (sy~ stucco) such as Hard-Coat Colored: or Cement-Based Hard-Coats with acrylic finish (no foam & breathabh Non-Combustible & Non-Flammabl Insect & Vermin Resistant Superior Bonding Sider-Oxydro is pleased to introduce our Hard-( Stucco & Decorative Coatings: Base Coats: Monobase BC Concentrate - A traditional concentrated hard-coat stucco base/scratch coat onl, requiring the addition of masonry sand and water at jobsite. It has the unique benefits of vapor permeab fiber reinforcement and water repellency - unmatch, the industry to accept finish coats such as Monosid, Sider-Plast Finish or our other finish coats. Monobase RU - This pre-mixed hard-coat baseL, coat is easy to apply. Packaged pre-sanded, it only requires the addition of water at the jobsite. It is a c water repellent yet breathable base-coat ready to ac~ finish coats such as Monosideral, Sider-Plast Fini: our other finish coats. http://www.sider-oxydro.com/decorative_coatings.htm 8/3/2006 Finish Coats: Monosideral - Traditional hard-coat colored ceml stucco at its finest, integrally colored and easy to us simply mix with water and apply directly over woo~ with lath/base coat or over masonry substrates. It is strong & durable, water repellent yet breathable fini Monosideral will render an 'old-worM' modeled lot variety colors and textures. Marble Stone - Marble Stone Finish is a premixe marble aggregate hard-coat colored stucco finish fe~ unique properties of water repellency, vapor perme~ & weather resistance. Marble Stone Finish provide: smooth or textured colored wall finish as desired. Sider-Tuscan Finish - An 'old-world' Tuscany colored rendering, providing a slick traditional finis Rather thin in application, it will render an 'old-styh with textures such as a fine skip-trowel. Sider-Plast Finish - Our acrylic coating, renderi~ textures such as Swirl, Coarse Sand, Fine Sand... Designed for application over hard-coat base-coats. Monobase BC Concentrate or Monobase RU as a coat acrylic system replacing EIFS, yet no foam an breathes! Plaster/Gypsum: Sider-Gyp Kote - Our interior gypsum/plaster ba designed for application directly over masonry, con and/or metal lath at a thickness of 1/4' to 3/4'. Fora to accept Sider-Gyp & Sider-Veneer. http://www.sider-oxydro.com/decorative_coatings.htm 8/3/2006 HARD-COAT COLORED DECORATIVE COATINGS BY~i~ER-OXYDRO, ... Page 4 of 5 Sider-Gyp - Our interior wall and ceiling gypsur plaster coating providing an extremely hard, durabl smooth finish. It can be finished smooth, textured t achieve a stippled, knock-down or skip-trowel effec covered with paint or wallpaper It is available in di aggregate sizes along with its base coat: Sider-Gyp Sider-Veneer - Our ultra-smooth wall and ceiling gypsum-plaster veneer coating that provides an ext hard, durable and smooth finish formulated to be sa achieving an extremely smooth veneer rendering. I' also be textured to achieve a stippled, knock-down I trowel effect or covered with paint or wallpaper. Especially formulated for application over its base ~ Sider-Gyp Kote. Paint: Siderite & Siderite-C- These two cement-base paints are the natural choice when a water repellent vapor permeable paint is required. Siderite provides traditional smooth finish while Siderite-C allows fo coarser sand finish appearance. Text and images used in this xvebsite are provided for information purposes only. THIS IS NOT A SPECIFICATION! While every effort has been made to be comprehensive and accurate, the publisher cannot accept any liability for on'fissions or errors. Users should contact Sider-Oxy&o, Inc. for the product(s) referred to in this website to ensure that any information used to make decisions about the product(s) is as up-to-date and complete as possible. Text and images contained in this website and its links are considered property of Sider-Oxydro, Inc. and may http://www.sider-oxydro.com/decorative_coatings.htm 8/3/2006 HARD-COAT COLORED STU~O & DECORATIVE COATINGS BY~DER-OXYDRO, ... Page 5 of 5 not used or reproduced without the express written consent of Sider-Oxy&o, Inc. and as xvell without the reference name:' Sider-Oxy&o, Inc'. http://www.sider-oxydro.com/decorative_coatings.htm 8/3/2006 SiDEb~.-()X5 DR( I: ( (OLOR (HART- ' '' ' ' ) N ' Page 2 of 3 http IA~ww sider--oxydro corn/color c}~art btm 8 ~,2006 UNDER CANOPY LUMINAIRE Security's UCL Series is designed for serwce station canopies or commercial surface mount applications. The glass refractor and vertical burn lamp are engineered to provide uniform, high- angle brightness to attract and welcome customers. Available in pulse start and standard metal halide, the UCL series is an efficient, energy saving, safety and security lighting fixture that's easy to install and maintain. Modular accessories allow the standard UCL fixture to install virtually anywhere, making lighting upgrades cost- effective and desireable. Fixture Specifications FEATURES · Superior refractor design optimizes light distribution for safet~ and identibj · Rugged, lightweight die cast aluminum ballast assembly runs cool and provides long component life · Tool-free entry with hinged cover · Gaskets provide watertight seal to mounting surface, ballast assembly, and lens · Built-in handles · NRTL/C certified for wet locations · Finished in white Lektrocote® scratch-resistant powder paint · Self-centering for one-person installation · Lamp included DIMENSIONS - UCL ORDERING INFORMATION (PETROLEUM CANOPY INSTALLATION) METAL HALIDE UCL-250H8W-L 2SOMH 120/208/240/277 (MT) riPE 330 1485 ORDERING INFORMATION (SURFACE-MOUNT INSTALLATION) UCLSM-320PSW-L 320PS 120/208/2401'277 (Mr} UCLSM-250H8W-L 250MH 120/208/240/277 (MT} Performance Designed Lighting Products DIMENSIONS - UCLSM A www,$ecuritylighting, com 1085 Johnson Drive · Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 · lOLL FREE: 800-544-4848 · PHONE: 847 279 0627 · FAX: 847-279 0642 Metal and Copper Roofs, LLC )ting Supplies Page 1 of 3 Metal and Copper Roofs, LLC -- Products We offer a variety of high quality roofing products: Stamped Shingles - Victorian - Shield - Diamond Bay Windows Metal Stamped Panels Contact Us Stamped Shingles or copper shingle exposure is 17 x 12 inches which gives a 3 inch head lap. There are 70.5 shingles per square. Custom flashings are available. hield Stamped Shingles The metal or copper shingle exposure is 11.5 inches x 9.5 inches which gives a 3 inch head lap. There are 150 shingles per square. Custom flashings are available. amond Stamped Shingles The metal or copper shingle exposure is 8 1/2 inches x 10 inches which gives a 3 inch head http://www.metalandcopperroofs.com/products.html 8/2/2006 Met.al and Copper Roofs, LLC )ting Supplies Page 3 of 3 Metal Stamped Panels A fish scale design stamped metal panel with a locking nail flange. The panels are 24 1/2 inches wide exposure and come in 10 foot lengths. Perfect for historical restoration or adding beauty to any building. Copyright ©2004 - 2005 Metal and Copper Roofs, LLC. All rights reserved. For additional information, please email artisan~sigecom.net. http://www.metalandcopperroofs.com/products.html 8/2/2006 Metal and Copper Root's, I.I,C - Roofing Supplies Page 2 ot'2 'Copyright 02004 - 2005 Metal and Copper Roofs, LLC. All rights reserved. For additional information, please email artisan@sigecomnet. htlp://www nqetalandcopperrool's corn/colors/index.him I 8/J/=000 Metal aI~d ( oppe' {c o ~s I~[~C - Rooi~r~g Sttppl{es Page l of 2 Meta~ and Copper Roofs~ LLC ~- Available Bark Bronze SamNtnne I'SR= (i9 ['SR= 55 Product Colors Matte giach Hartford Green llemlock Green ['SR=Oh I'SR=09 TSR 20 Clas,~ic Brnnze Stnne Rn3al Blue TSR= 1'7 E~ergreen Terra Cot~a FSR= 15 $parlm~ Brm~ze grnwn I'SR= 13 i'SR :0¢/ Beige Dnve G fey TSR'37 TSR 3g Slate Grey White TSR=.71 Musknt G fey I'SR= 16 I'SR= / 4 '1 SR= 2 [ Seaport Cnlonial Red ISR= >~ I SR-.26 Palina Cnpper *Brite lied ~/ i'SR= 47 clear chat FSR= 46 Metallic £oto s *#Metallk *Champagne £opper I'SR= I'SR= 36 *THESE COLORS CARRY AN UPCHARGE. #METALLIC COPPER DOES NOT AGE OR PATINA COLORS SHOWN ARE SAMPLES AND MAY VARY SLIGHTLY FROM ACTUAL MATERIAL TSR - Totat Solar Reflectivity Colors with a TSR > 25 meet "Color Color critefi a CUSTOM COLORS ARE AVAII,ABi. E 8/.>/2006 OLORCF/AR -SIDEROXYDRO I ( OXYD~O, It~C Staadard Color Chart MONOSIDERA, L Ti-aditiol~a/ha~' '<i-<.~'~'al coloi'ed stucco ai ils fitqesL irtmgrally colored k ~_jivapor permeable paim/coa6l-~g is requkcd http:,/w~,~ w sidcr<~x'~ di o com/color chart btm 8/3/2006 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: December 27, 2005 REVISED: December 28, 2005 RENEWED: April 26, 2006 AMENDED: August 2, 2006 TO: Warex Terminal Corp. 9945 Route 25 Mattituck, NY 11952 Please take notice that your application dated December 7, 2005 Locabon of property. 9945 Route 25, Matt,tuck, NY .~W~ County Tax Map No. 1000- Section 142 Block 1 Lot 27 i ~; ¢,[!~ - 3 2006 Is ret~ed herewith ~d disapproved on the following ~ounds: ~....: The proposed cons~ction, on this 24,829 squ~e foot p~cel in ~e B District, ~'iii~ p~su~t to ~icle X Section 100-102, which states; ~ ~?~'-"~ "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet, following the proposed construction, the building will have a side yard setback of+/- 2 feet. In addition~ the extension of the existing canopy is not permitted pursuant to Article III~ Section 100-242~ A., which states; "Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling~ reconstruction or enlargement of a nonconforming building containing a conforming use~ provided that such action does not create any new nonconformance or increase the degree of nonconformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings. On January 4~ 1995~ the applicant was issued a variance to construct a canopy with an insufficient front yard setback of 11.5 feet. Following the proposed construction~ the size of the canopy will be increased and is noted having a 13.33-foot front yard setback. Also, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-103~ C., which states[ Y "A proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than 60 linear feet of frontage on one street." Following the proposed construction, the building will have +/-120 feet of frontage on Factory Avenue and +/- 70 feet of frontage on Main Road. In addition, the proposed car wash use requires special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Both proposed uses require site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. This Notice of Disapproval was amended on August 2, 2006, following the submission of a new site plan showing additional proposed work. · Authonzec~ S~gnamre Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A., PLANNING PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAIl.lNG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 27, 2006 Mark Wolfgang New York State Department of Transportation - Region Ten 250 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattimck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business NYSDOT Case No.: 01-99P Dear Mr. Wolfgang: The Planning Board is reviewing this site plan for the proposed re-construction of a gas station in order to remove the existing automotive service station, expand the existing convenience store, reconstruct the existing gas pump canopy and add a car wash, with a total build out of 3,168 sq. ft. including a change in parking from 5 existing parking spaces to 12 parking spaces, on .55 acres in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e comer of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue known as 9945 Main Road in Mattituck. After an initial review of the application, the Planning Board has setious concerns regarding additional traffic generated in this area and its impact on the surrounding community. As a result the Planning Board requested the applicant obtain a traffic studyin order to review the impact the proposed project would have on traffic. For your information and to better assist you in your review of a permit, please find the following enclosed: A copy of the Traffic Engineering Assessment prepared by Dunn Engineering dated July 12, 2006. Covenants & restrictions for cross access with the adjacent Waldbaum's shopping center. As requested by this Department and in your letter to the applicant dated July 7, 2006, the applicant was asked to secure a cross access agreement with the neighboring Waldbaum's parking lot. As per the applicant's recent submission, dated received June 30, 2006, the applicant has been unsuccessful at securing a cross access agreement (see attached). Without a cross access agreement, the Phrming Board's concerns regarding traffic at this location are further magnified. Warex Project Page Two July 27, 2006 The Planning Department has preliminarily reviewed the traffic study and tabled this application pending additional review data and comments from interested agencies. Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything further. Senior Phnner Cc: File Encs: Traffic Engineering Assessment prepared by Durra Engineering dated July 12, 2006 Covenants & restrictions for cross access PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Planning Board Members From: Amy Ford, Senior Planner Date: 24 July 2006 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business As requested at the Planning Board work session on July 17, 2006 please find attached an excerpt from the "Traffic Impact Study for proposed CVS Pharmacy" prepared by Dunn Engineering date received in this office April 12, 2004. Please be aware of the following points: · According to the CVS traffic impact study, "The estimated Average Annual Daily Traffic on Main Road (NYS Route 25) from Manor Lane to Sound Avenue, provided by the NYS DOT, was 15,532 vehicies per dayin 2001" (page 14). The Warex traffic impact studyreported "... the Average Annual Daily Traffic on Main Road in Mattituck in 2004 was 12,849 vehicles per day". · Based on their projections, k was anticipated that the busiest travel time period from CVS would be on Saturday midday. Based on their projections, the Warex project would also generate the most traffic on Saturday midday. · The CVS traffic study refers to other planned developments in the vicinity, including the Warex project on page 33, however, the report onlylooks at the development of a "mini-mart convenience store", stating the project will generate some traffic, although its effects will be minor in nature. The CVS report states "information presented in the ITE Trip Generation report indicated that up to 78% of traffic patronizing gasoline/service stations with convenience markets is already on the roadway network for another purpose". File Jamie Richter, Town Engineer I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Traffic Volumes Available traffic flow information was obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. The available information consisted of machine traffic volume counts on Main Road (NYS Route 25). The estimated Average Annual Daily Traffic on Main Road (NYS Route 25) fi'om Manor Lane to Sound Avenue, provided by the New York State Department of Transportation, was 15,532 vehicles per day in 2001. To supplement the available traffic machine count data and to obtain specific turning count information of the existing traffic during the peak hours of the proposed development, manual intersection turning movement counts for morning and evening peak hours were collected on a weekday. Also, traffic turning movement counts were collected on a Saturday afternoon. These counts were performed in December 2003. An examination of the traffic volume information reveals that the peak weekday morning and evening traffic volumes occur between the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M, respectively. The peak existing weekend traffic volumes occur on Saturdays from 11:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. The available traffic volume information is contained in the section of the Appendix entitled "Traffic Volume Counts". Accident Records Verbal descriptions were requested from the New York State Department of Transportation concerning all the reportable and non-reportable accident cases that have occurred on NYS Route 25, from Sigsbee Road on the west to Marlene Lane on the east (endpoints inclusive), for the three latest years for which records are available. This data made it possible to identify existing accident hazards and to evaluate the effect the proposed development would have on the rate of accidents in the area. After receiving the accident data, an accident statistic summary table and a collision diagram were prepared for the three most recent years for which accident data was available. The accident statistic summary table and collision diagram showing all of the reportable and non-reportable accidents occurring on this section of NYS Route 25 during the September 1998 through August 2001 period is presented in Figure 4, Accident Diagram. The accident statistic summary table presented in Figure 4 contains a listing of accidents by accident type for NYS Route 25. WHllXCV$ Pharmacy, Maffituck-23140.00 File: TIS.w~d 14 FACTORY AVENUE 25~704-1528-28) SIGSBEE ROAD (25-0704-1527) MAIN ROAD (NYS ROUTE 25) b ,'~'~'r"~' MATTITUCK PLAZA .~SHOPPING CENTER MARLENE LANE (25-0704-1528-29) FIGURE 4 ACCIDENT DIAGRAM MAIN ROAD (NYS ROUTE 25) FROM SIGSBEE ROAD/FACTORY AVENUE TO MARLENE LANE SEPTEMBER 1998-AUGUST 2001 I I I I I ! I I I I I ! I I I ! ! I The accident diagram contained in Figure 4 presents both the reportable and non-reportable accidents that have occurred at the intersections and highway sections between mile markers 25-0704-1527 and 25- 0704-1528-29 fi.om September 1998 through August 2001. It should be noted that without the availability of the source documents needed in order to complete a more detailed accident analysis (accident source documents fi:om the New York State Department of Transportatinn are unavailable to private parties due to confidentiality concerns), only a general evaluation of accidents in the area can be made. This general evaluation and analysis was completed only to provide the New York State Depa~haient of Transportation with information to assist its review of our application. It should also be noted that the summary of the accident diagram shown in Figure 4 is influenced by the recording of the accident by police personnel. ORen accidents are recorded incorrectly, particularlywhen many driveways and signals are in close proximity. The following two intersections were further examined to determine if there were patterns in accident type, pavement ennditions, lighting conditions, etc.: NYS Route 25 at Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue NYS Route 25 at Marlene Lane Possible actions to be taken to alleviate the problems were also examined for each intersection. The following section describes the findings of this detailed accident investigation. The summary table on Figure 4 indicates a total of 21 accidents on NYS Route 25 between Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue and Marlene Lane (endpoints inclusive). Wet pavement accidents did not occur at an inordinately high rate at only 5% of the total (wet, ice and snow enmbined). The largest concentration of accidents in the study area occurred at the Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue intersection. This would be expected as this is a high volume intersection with four approach legs. Fifteen of the total of twenty-one accidents were reported to have occurred here. Intersection Location - NYS Route 25 at Si~sbee Road/Factory Avem~ The majority of accidents which occurred at this intersection during the September 1998 to August 2001 time period were rear-end accidents. Specifically, 6 of the 15, or 40% of the total reportable and non- reportable accidents occurring at the intersection during the September 1998 to August 2001 time period were rear-end accidents. Overall, 9 of the 15, or 60% of all reportable and non-reportable accidents occurring at this intersection fi:om September 1998 to August 2001 represented injury accidents. WHB'CVS Phanmcy, Mattituck.23140,00 File: TIS.wpd 16 I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t ! ! Rear end accidents are typically indicative of the frequent starts and stops that occur within the traffic stream at a signalized intersection. It should be noted that the traffic signal was installed at the intersection of Main Road at Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue in 2000. Intersection Location - NYS Route 25 at Marlene Lane Accidents at this unsignalized intersection during the September 1998 to August 2001 time period were dominated by fight-angle accidents. Specifically, 3 of the 4, or 75% of the total number of reportable and non-reportable accidents occurring at the Marlene Lane intersection were right-angle accidents. Two of the three right-angle accidents at this location involved a southbound left turning vehicle and another eastbound thru vehicle. The third right-angle accident involved a northbound thru vehicle and another westbound thru vehicle. The occurrence of the first two right-angle accidents at the unsignalized Marlene Lane intersection can be attributed to the failure of the drivers to observe the left turn restriction posted for traffic exiting via this Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center driveway. Overall, 2 of the 4, or 50% of all reportable and non-reportable accidents occurring at this intersection from September 1998 to August 2001 represented injury accidents. WI-IB~,C'VS Pharmacy, Maltituck-23140.00 File: TIS.wpd 17 I I ! i I I I I I I Information presented in the ITE Trip Generation report indicates that up to 65% of traffic patronizing pharmacies is already on the roadway network for another purpose. For the purpose of this report, a pass- by credit of 50% has been used. In this manner, a conservative estimate of the traffic generated by the proposed development is presented. Table 1 presents a breakdown of the anticipated traffic entering and exiting the proposed development for the weekday A.M. peak hour, weekday P.M. peak hour, and the Saturday peak hour. The table also specifies the estimated pass-by trips and the net new traffic on the adjacent street network. Pharmacy (14,467 S.F.) 42 29 61 6~ 76 79 (ITE Code 880) Less Pass-By Trips 21 14 30 30 38 39 (50%) Net New Traffic on Adjacent 21 15 31 31 38 40 Roadways I t i I I I I I ! Table 1 Site-Generated Traffic Proposed CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck It can be seen by examining Table 1 that the highest site-generated traffic can be expected to occur on a Saturday during the midday peak hour when an estimated 78 vehicle trips per hour will be generated by the proposed CVS Pharmacy (38 in and 40 out). During the weekday P.M. peak hour, the site- generated volumes are anticipated to be 62 vehicles per hour (31 in and 31 out). During the weekday A.M. peak hour, trip generation at thc site will be lower when the site-generated traffic is expected to be 36 vehicles per hour (2l in and 15 out). WHBhCVS Pharmacy, Maaituck-23140,00 22 'i I I I I I I I ! I I t I I I I I I I Planned Roadway Improvements The latest available Nassau-Suffolk Transportation Improvement (TIP) does not list any projects involving the reconstruction and improvement of roadways serving the proposed development prior to its expected completion. Other Planned Developments Discussions were hold with representatives of the Town of Southold regarding other proposed developments pending in the vicinity of the site which may affect traffic conditions. While a number of projects were identified, they are considered minor in nature and theft impacts are therefore considered to be included in the normal annual growth rate applied to background traffic. A proposal is pending to develop a mini-mart convenience store within the existing Citgo gasoline/service station located on the northeast comer of Main Road and Factory Avenue and opposite the proposed CVS Pharmacy site. The existing Citgo gasoline/service station presently has access to both Main Road and Factory Avenue. While this one pending project is expected to generate some traffic, its effects on the surrounding roadway network will be minor. Information presented in the ITE Trip Generation report indicates that up to 78% of traffic patronizing gasoline/service stations with convenience markets is already on the roadway network for another purpose. Thus, for the purpose of this report, the traffic from this one pending project was considered to be included in the 2.0% annual growth factor applied to the seasonally adjusted existing counts to account for normal background traffic growth. WHBXC'VS Pharmacy. MaOStack-231 ~0.00 File: TlS.wgd 33 I I I I I I I ! I I I I Alternative Uses I i I I I I I The site of the proposed CVS is zoned General Business (B) District. This zoning classification allows for a wide range of commercial and retail development under the Town of Southold Code. Each of these uses has associated with it the potential to generate varying levels of traffic. Among the uses allowed on thc CVS site under the General Business District are retail stores. To present a comparison of the traffic generation characteristics of this other allowable use with the proposed CVS the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) report Trip Generation was utilized to determine the site generated traffic for use of the site as retail shopping. Table 5, Trip Generation Alternative Site Use, presents the results of the trip generation calculations using 1TE for the retail alternative. Also included in Table 5 is the trip generation of the proposed CVS for comparison. 14,467 S.F. 30 19 49 84 91 175 128 118 246 (Land Use Code 820) Proposed CVS Pharmacy 42 29 71 61 61 122 76 79 155 (Land Use Code 880) Table 5 Trip Generation Alternative Site Uses As Table 5 indicates, the retail usc is expected to generate more traffic than the proposed CVS Pharmacy during the weekday P.M. peak hour and Saturday midday peak hours. WI IB~CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck-23140.00 File: TlS.wpd 48 i I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I Our study and analysis have concluded that with the roadway improvements described in this report, the development of the proposed CVS Pharmacy will have no adverse traffic impact on the adjacent highway network. Although the development of the proposed site will add traffic to the adjacent roadway network, the traffic impact will be minimized and the additional traffic will be accommodated by the modified roadway facilities. The following points should be recognized: The location and design of the access points will effectively distribute traffic to the adjacent roadways, including Main Road, Sigsbee Road, Factory Avenue, and Marlene Lane. The access points to the site will be clearly visible to traffic on Main Road, Sigsbee Road, and Marlene Lane. No sight distance restrictions will exist in the vicinity of the driveways. The proposed CVS Pharmacy will utilize four access points. The existing site has one access driveway on Main Road, informal access on Sigsbee Road, and two access driveways on Marlene Lane. Thus, the access plan for the proposed development will be similar to but formalize the current site's access. The access drives have been designed to be well-separated and to disthbute the vehicles to several points, thereby minimizing the overall traffic impact. The following describes the four access points that will be used for the proposed CVS Pharmacy: · Main Road at Site Access Drive This access drive will provide for right turns into and out of the proposed CVS Pharmacy from Route 25. Currently, the Bowling Alley's access to Route 25 provides for full movements with no reslriction of left tums. It is recommended that this access drive be designed to accommodate right turn in and out operation only and that a "Stop" sign be installed for exiting site traffic. Channelization through the use o fa raised median is recommended to enforce the left turn restriction for westbound vehicles entering the site access drive and for northbound vehicles exiting the site, and also to separate the entering and exiting traffic. WHB~CVS Pharmacy, Matfituck.23140.00 File: TlS.wlxt 51 I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I · Sigsbee Road at Site Access Drive This unsignalized access point on Sigsbee Road will consist of one entering lane and one exiting lane and will provide full mining movements into and out of the site. Exiting traffic will be controlled with a "Stop" sign. · Marlene Lane at Site Access Drives Two access points are proposed on Marlene Lane. These access drives will provide full turning movements into and out of the site. Two lanes will exist at each of the two driveways, one lane for entering traffic and one lane for exiting traffic. Exiting traffic wi Il be controlled with a "Stop" sign. The absence of a shoulder/parking lane on Main Road along the site frontage eliminates any on- street parking opportunities. The appropriate "No Stopping Anytime" signs are posted along the site frontage of Main Road. This signage enforces the lack of on-street parking on the south side of Main Road and ensures adequate sight distance for vehicles exiting the site. It is anticipated that the development will not increase the accident experience with the implementation of the described roadway improvements and the design of the access plan. The site-generated traffic estimates for the proposed CVS Pharmacy have been based on the 1TE "Trip Generation" report. The highest site-generated traffic can be expected to occur on a Saturday during the midday peak hour when an estimated 78 new vehicle trips per hour will be generated by the proposed CVS Pharmacy (38 in and 40 out). During the weekday P.M. peak hour, the site-generated volumes are anticipated to be 62 new vehicle trips per hour (31 in and 31 out). During the weekday A.M. peak hour, trip generation at the site will be lower when the site- generated traffic is expected to result in 36 new vehicle trips per hour (21 in and 15 out). The proposed CVS Pharmacy, based on ITE data, is expected to generate more new traffic than the existing uses only during the Saturday midday peak. The proposed CVS Pharmacy will generate a peak hour traffic flow of 155 vehicles per hour (combined entering and exiting). This fignre represents that amount of traffic which is diverted from other trip purposes (pass-by) plus the traffic whose sole trip purpose is to patronize the pharmacy. Using a pass-by credit of 50% for the peak hour of the site, the 155 vehicles attracted WHB\CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck-23140.00 File: TLg.v, Td 52 I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I by the site will actually add only 78 vehicles to the adjacent roadways. This increase in traffic will not have a significant impact on the operation of the adjacent intersections. The current zoning of the site of the proposed CVS Pharmacy allows for the development of a number of commemial and retail uses. This includes use of the site for retail shopping. This altemative use of the site would be expected to generate higher levels of traffic than the proposed use during the weekday P.M. peak hour and Saturday Midday peak hour. The existing "No Stopping Anytime" signs posted along the site frontage of Main Road re- enforce the lack of on-sta'eet parking on the south side of Main Road and ensure adequate sight distance for vehicles exiting the site. In order to mitigate the impact of the proposed CVS, as well as improve existing traffic conditions in the study area, the following roadway modifications are recommended: · Main Road at Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue The northbound Sigsbee Road approach should be widened and mstriped to provide two 10-foot lanes. It is recommended that the northbound Sigshee Road approach be striped to provide a combined left turrdthru lane and a separate right turn lane. The southbound Factory Avenue approach should be restriped to provide two 10-foot lanes. It is recommended that the southbound Factory Avenue approach be striped to provide a combined left turn/thru lane and a separate right turn lane. · Main Road at Site Access Drive It is recommended that this access drive be designed to accommodate fight m in and out operation only and that a "Stop" sign be installed for exiting site traffic. The charmelization through the use of a raised median is recommended to enforce the left turn restriction for westbound vehicles entering the site access drive and for northbound vehicles exiting the site, and also to separate the entering and exiting traffic. Left tums into and out of the site will be prohibited at this driveway. WHB~CVS Pharmacy, Matlituck-23140.00 File: TIS.wpd 53 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I · Main Road at Marlene Lane/Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center Access It is recommended that the northbound Marlene Lane approach be restriped to provide a combined left turn/thru lane and a separate right tm lane. 10. The intersection capacity analyses of the peak composite hours of highway traffic and pharmacy activity indicate that, with the implementation of the recommended roadway improvements, no adverse traffic impacts are expected on the adjacent roadway system. As a result of the addition of the site-generated traffic from the proposed CVS Pharmacy, there will be no degradation in the level of service at the adjacent signalized intersection of Main Road at Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue and at the adjacent unsignalized intersection of Main Road at Marlene Lane/Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center Access after the recommended roadway improvements described in this report are implemented. 11. The Town of Southold Code requires that one parking space be provided for each two hundred (200) square feet of total floor area for pharmacy uses such as that proposed. Therefore, 73 parking spaces are required based on a total 14,467 square foot pharmacy development. The site plan of the proposed development provides 77 total parking spaces (of which 4 are for hand/capped patrons). Thus, the 77 spaces furnished exceed Tov~ Code requirements and will be more than adequate to meet the needs of the patrons and employees of the proposed CVS Pharmacy development. 12. Due to the excellent patrol coverage and the close proximity of the firehouse, it should be recognized that excellent emergency services are available to service the proposed CVS Pharmacy. Since no adverse traffic impacts will occur for the proposed development with the recommended roadway improvements described in this report, as indicated by our detailed traffic engineering examination and analysis, it is recommended that the proposed development be approved. WItB\CVS Pharmacy, Matlituck-23140,00 File: T1S.wpd 54 I COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Town of Southold Planning Bd. 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attu: AmyFord, Senior Planner STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE July 14, 2006 JUL 2 0 2006 Pursuant to Section 239L & M of thc General Municipal Law, the following site plan which have been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan SCTM No. Warex Project 1000-142-1-27 NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action(s) associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, Thomas Isles, AICP Director of Planff~n~ ~-~--'"~ Chief Planner APF:cc LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR · P.O. BOX 6100 · (631) 853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 july 20, 2006 Southold Transportation Commission Neboysha Brashich, Chairman 175 EmoryRoad Cutchogue, New York 11935 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business Dear Mr. Bmshich: For your information, please find the following enclosed: · Comments, including associated materials/information, provided to the Zoning BoaM of Appeals under appeal # 5906 (7 pages total). · A copy of the Traffic Engineering Assessment prepared by Dunn Engineering dated July 12, 2006. The Planning Department has preliminarily reviewed the traffic study and tabled this application pending additional comments from your office and other interested agencies. Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything further. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. Senior Planner Cc: File Encs: Phnning Board comment packet for the ZBA. Traffic Engineering Assessment prepared by Dunn Engineering dated July 12, 2006 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: James Richter, Town Engineer From: Amy Ford, Senior Planner.~ Date: 20 July2006 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business For your information, please find the following enclosed: · Comments, including associated materials/information, provided to the Zoning Board of Appeals under appeal # 5906 (7 pages total). · A copy of the Traffic Engineering Assessment prepared by Dunn Engineering dated July 12, 2006. The Planning Department has preliminarily reviewed the traffic study and tabled this application pending additional comments from your office and other interested agencies. Please let me know if you have anyquestions or need anything further. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. Cc: File Encs: Planning Board comment packet for the ZBA. Traffic Engineering Assessment prepared by Dunn Engineering dated July 12, 2006 ARC Meeting Minutes Page Two July 13, 2006 New Applications: Peconic Recycling & Transfer SCTM: 1000-95-2-7 Committee recommends resubmission with additions to break down scale and give natural light (e.g. windows, ornamentation) and add deciduous trees. · Warex Project 2006 SCTM: 1000-142-1-27 Design tabled. Committee requests resubmission using softer colors (gray, beige). Submit materials and light fixture cuts. · East End Development (Preliminary) SCTM: 1000-63-3-15 Exterior layout and design of units well-received. Comments: minimize hard surface, add gardening area, consider one car garage instead of two, check driveway turnaround area on east and west sides of property, submit materials, colors, light cuts, possible handicap adaptability). The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Linda Randolph ARC Secretary TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES July 13, 2006 4:00 p.m. Town Hall Meeting Hall Present were: Chairman Sanford Hanauer, members Herbert Ernest, Howard Meinke, Ural Talgat, Joseph "Skip" Lee, Elizabeth Thompson, Planning Board Chair Jerilyn Woodhouse, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Bruno Semon, Senior Planner Amy Ford, ARC Secretary Linda Randolph, and project representatives. The minutes of the June 1, 2006 meeting were accepted. Elizabeth Thompson requested a copy of the "Retail Building Design Req's" which were distributed at the June meeting. Linda will get a copy from Mark Terry. Revisited Applications: Mullen Motors SCTM: 1000-62-3-11, 22.5 & 24.1 Application approved as submitted with two provisions: (1) Submission of catalog cuts for fixtures (assume white aluminum window frames); (2) If additional fighting/signage is required by another agency, ARC will revisit. · Romanelli Brothers SCTM: 1000-60-2-7.1 Accept with screening of a/c condensors from north side and Main Road with evergreens. LaPanache Hair Design SCTM: 1000-18-5-13.8 N/A: Applicant did not submit or represent at meeting. Montauk Bus Service SCTM: 1000-96-1-1.2 Conditionally approved, based on architect's sketch at meeting: eliminated small dormer over porch, added 2 large reverse dormers in front and rear increasing fascia to 8"; changed windows to quads. Drawing to be resubmitted for the file. M & R Developing SCTM: 1000-96-1-1.8 Same comments as Montauk Bus Service above. Signage to be submitted at a later date. SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Stephen M. Jones Chief Executive Officer Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, New York 11769-0901 (631) 563-0219 Fax (631)563-0370 July 13, 2006 Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 1!2[' dUL 2006 Re: Warex Project Site Plan Application, SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: I would like to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Site Plan application for the above referenced project. Based on the infomaafion provided it appears that the applicants proposed use will not effect the Laurel Lake Wellfield. However, the applicant should be advised that because of the projected high water use for this project, if they elect to connect to public water, there may be extraordinary requirements associated with a water tap. Please continue to send all Site plan applications, SEQRA coordination applications, EAF's, DEIS's and FEIS's to the attention of Kimberly Kennedy at 4060 Sunrise Hwy, Oakdale, NY 11769. Thank you. Steph~ M~bl~e~f ChieffEx01~ufiv~Dfficer SMJ:kk PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Date: Julyll, 2006 To: Ruth Oliva, Zoning Board of Appeals Chair Fmrm Jerilyn B Woodhouse, Planning Board Omirperson~ Re: Appeal# 5906 Proposed site plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Matfituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business In respome to your memo dated June 21, 2006, the Planning Board (PB) has reviewed the revised site phn and offers the following comments: We are site planning this project under the Building Departments Notice of Disapproval dated December 27, 2005 and last revised on December 28, 2005. The notice states "Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet, following the proposed construction, the building will have a side yard setback of + 2 feet"; additionallythe proposed car wash requires special exception approval. · The Planning Board is currently reviewing a site plan certified by Eugene G. Kempey, Professional Engineer dated November 22, 2005 and last revised June 28, 2006. The Planning Board reviewed this application at their work session on June 12, 2006 and accepted this application. Please find attached a copy a letter to the applicant from this Department, dated June 22, 2006, detailing changes that should be made to the site plan in addition to other site plan requirements. Please note the Planning Board has requested a traffic smdyto review anypossible traffic that may be generated as a result of the proposed project. The applicant has informed the Planning Board that they have retained Dunn Engineering to complete the pending traffic study. The Mattituck Fire District responded on June 28, 2006 after review stating "no additional water supplyis required, however they recommend that all drives and roads meet the $outhold Town Requirements for clearance of roads and right of ways". See attached letter. Warex Project Page Two July 11, 2006 The New York State Department of Transportation responded on July 7, 2006 after review requiring additional information including, but not limited to, obtaining cross access from adjacent properties, right turn only access from NYS Route 25 and ensuring all drainage remain on site. Please see attached NYS DOT letter for your information. Prior to PB approval, this application will require the following approvals: Southold Town Building Inspector, Town Engineer, LWRP, NYS DOT, NYSDEC, SCDHS, SC Planning and the Architectural Review Committee. · After ftuther review of the application at the July 10, 2006 Planning Board work session, the PB would like to highlight the following issues of concern: 1. The proposed construction would increase the existing building by2,502 square feet to include the removal of automotive repair services and addition of a convenience store and car wash. The Planning Board feels this intensification of use may be inappropriate at this location. 2. The proposed site plan indicates one-way ingress along NYS Route 25 and one-wayegress along FactoryAvenue, closing up one (1) curb cut along NYS Route 25 at its comer with Factory Avenue. While the Planning Board is in support of the closure of the curb cut, the Planning Board still has concerns regarding the anticipated traffic as a result of this project, particularly traffic exiting onto Factory Avenue. 3. As stated in the attached June 22, 2006 letter from this Department, the applicant was asked to secure a cross access agreement with the neighboring Waldbaum's parking lot. As per the applicant's recent submission, dated received June 30, 2006, the applicant has been unsuccessful at securing a cross access agreemem (see attached). Without a cross access agreement, the Planning Board's concerns regarding traffic at this location are ftuther magnified. In conclusion, the Planning Board will review this application further after the requested traffic smdyhas been received and a more thorough review of this proposed project maytake place. Once received, the Planning Board will review the traffic study, taking into account the proposed intensification of use, lack of cross access with the neighboring parking lot to review the impacts this will have on traffic in this location. Prior to the completion of the above referenced memo, the applicant submitted the requested traffic study on July 14, 2006. The Planning Board will review this new information at the next scheduled work session to discuss its content and provide additional comments, if appropriate. We hope these comments will be useful to the ZBA in its review of this appeal. Please contact this office should you have any questiom or need anything further. Cc: Planning Board members Enc: Attachments Sender: Subject: SCTM#:IO00- I/--~7~ - [ Date: Comments: Submission Without a Cover Letter Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, N.Y. 11978 631-288-2480 63t-288-2544 Fax July 12, 2006 Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp. 640 Sunrise Highway 6West Babylon, NY 11704 Re: , JUL 14 2006 Tra~c~Engineering Assessment Proposed_Car Wash Addition N/e comer NYS Rte. 25 Mattituck, NY Dear Mr. Kamath: As requested, Dram Engineering Associates PC has completed our professional traffic engineering evaluation in connection with thc proposed redevelopment of the existing gasoline station, located on the northeast comer of Main Road (NYS Route25) at Factpry A..venue, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The project envisions the expansion of the existing convenience store and addition ora carwash to the gasoline station. Figure 1 shows the location of the project site and Figure 2 shows the boundaries of the property and the adjacent roadway network. Our examination was performed to evaluate the potential traffic impact of tho proposed development, including trip generation, access, roadway capacity and safety. During the course of the study, the following specific work tasks were performed: Several genoa,al visits to the site to attest to our observations of existing traffic movements at various times of the day and under different conditions. 2. Collection and analysis of existing Iraffic data as available from the Town of Southold, New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. 3. Estimates of the additionai traffic that will be generated by the proposed project, These estimates were based on information provided in the latest (7~) edition of the report Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Mr. Vivian Kamath July 12, 2006 Page 4 4. Examination of the ability oftbe street network to accommodate the additionai volumes that will be generated by the proposed use. Int~'seetion capacity analyses was performed at the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue and Factory Avenue at the site access driveway for the following scenarios: a 2007 No-Build Traffic b. 2007 Build Traffic 5. E.xarnlnation of access to and fi:om the site and the parking area from the standpoint of location and design. 6. Preparation of a letter repert setting forth our findings and ennelusions. The following sections present the results of our efforts in thla regard. Existing Conditions As previously stated, tho site is located on the northeast comer of NYS Route 25, Main Road, at Factory Avenue, in Mattituck. The gas station is surrounded on three sides by a shopping center. At present, the site contains a gas station with eight fueling stations, and a small convenience store. The site has access to both NYS Route 25 and to Factory Avenue. There is one existing &leeway on Factory Avenue and two on Main Road. In order to determ;'ne.the an~ount of traffic being generated by the existing use of the site, traffic counts were performed at the three existing site driveways during the weekday 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM peak periods, and during the Saturday Midday peak period. The results of these traffic counts are presented in Table 1. AS can be seen, the weekday AM peak hour occurs between 7:00 an 8:00 AM, when 28 vehicles entered the site and 30 vehicles left the site, and the weekday PM peak hour occurred between 4:00 and 5:00 PM, when 32 vehicles entered the site and 33 left the site. On Saturday, 53 vehicles entered the site and 46 vehicles left the site during the peak hour, which oeenrred between 1:00 and 2:00 PM. Main Road is a New York State highway facility that provides direct access to the site. Although NYS Route 25 extends the entire length of Long Island, it serves as Main Street for many of the communities along the north fork of Long Island, including Mattituck. Near the site of the proposed development, Main Road provides one lane in each direction, flanl~ed by shoulders, with additional turning lanes at major intersections. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Development along Main Road near the site is primarily commercial. According to information provided by New York State Department of Transportation, the Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on Main Road in Mattituck in 2004 was 12849 vehicles por day. AADT is a transportation engineering and plamfing tutiii defined as the average traffic volume at a givan location on any day of the year, including weekends. uly 2006 Page 5 Existing Gas Station 28 30 38 34 53 46 Traffic Table 1 Site Generated Traffic Existing Oas Station with Convenience Store Future Site Trip Generation The current site plan for the proposed development envisions the ~pansion of thc existing small convenience store, and the addition of a full service car wash to thc site. The eight fueling stations willbc retained. Information contained in thc report "Trip Generation", 7a~ Edition, published by the hist/tute of Tran~ot~tion Engineers, was consulted to estimate the number of new trips expected to be generated by the proposed project. Under Land Use Code 948, Automated Car Wash, the ITE report presents data on trip making characteristics for a car wash. This information indicates that a car wash of the size proposed under this application might be expected to generate 18 new trips (9 entering and 9 exiting) during the weekday PM peak hour,-and 2-Z new trips (11 entering and 11 exiting) during the Saturday Midday peak hour. However, the information in the report is based on studies conducted at one or two car washes, and the user is cautioned in its use due to the small sample s/ze. In addition, no information is provided as to trip generation at car washes during the weekday AM peak hour. The ITl/report also provides data regarding trip making at gas stations w/th convenience stores and car washes, under Land Use Code 946, Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash. Based on this information, the site would generate 98 trips during the weekday AM peak hour, and 110 ~rips during the weekday PM peak hour. This represents an increase of 40 new trips in the AM and 38 during the weekday PM. Once again, under this Land Use Code, no data is presented for the Saturday peak hour. Therefore, it has been assumed for the purposes ofth/s ~eport that the new trips generated by the site during the Saturday midday peak hour will be proportional to the increase in ir/ps during the other peak hour analyzed for this report. This results in a total of 60 new hips, 32 entering and 28 exiting, which is considerably higher than the ITE report predicts that a new car wash would generate. It should be noted that not all the Waflic visiting the car wash would be new traffic added to the roadway network. Rather, it is likely that some portion of the tra~c would already be on the roadway network for another purpose, and will visit the car wash as part of that multipurpose trip. However, for the purposes of this report, it has been assumed that all the traffic visiting the proposed car wash would be new traffic, thereby presenting a conservative worst-case evaluation. This uip generation information is presented in Table 2. Mr. Vivian gamath July 12, 2006 Page 6 The sit.generated traffic was ~en distributed on the new driveway configuration, and on thc roadway network. It has been assumed that the new site generated traffic will have origins and destinations similar to the traffic already visiting the site. Note that the existing gas station traffic was also redistributed on thc roadway network to reflect thc new driveway configuration. Ve~0pm~ ~y~ ~ ' ei~t~''~' E~t~r Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash 50 48 §5 55 N/A N/A LUC 946 Less Existing Gas 28 30 38 34 53 46 Station Traffic Total New Site 22 18 17 21 32* 28* Generated Traffic * Assumed number of new trips. See text for ex )lanation. Table 2 Site Generated Traffic Gas Station with Convenience Store and Car Wash Access Examination As statcd, therc arc currently three driveways serving thc site, two on Main Road and one on Factory Avenue. In keeping with good access n~gement practices, the site plan for the project proposes a single driveway on Main Road and a single driveway on Factory Avenue. The second, westernmost driveway on Main Road will be eliminated. Thc remainirlg driveway on Main Road will be configured to allow for right tums only into thc sitc. Left and right tums into and out of the site will be permitted at thc driveway on Factory Avenue. Noto that, as requested by the Town, the applicant has attcmptcd to obtain access to thc parking lot of the adjaccnt shopping center property. However, the owner of that property is unwilling to provide access at this time. Thc applicant ~mains willing to enter into a cross access agreement with thc adjacent property owner. Mr. Vivian I~amath July 12, 2006 Page 7 Intemectlon Capacity Analyses In order to ensure that the proposed project will not have any dett~ental impact on operating conditions on the roadway network, and to ensure that thc site driveways will operate in a safe and efficient manner, without undue delay for vehicles enteaing and leaving the proposed development, signalized and unsig~allzed intersection capacity analyses have been performed. These capacity analyses were performed utilizing soRware based on the methodologies set forth in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, and utilized the traffic volumes described above, adjusted to reflect peak summer season, and the estimates of new vehicles expected to be generated by the proposed development, and also reflect the traffic generated by the new CVS drugstore on the southwest comer of Main Road at Factory Avenue. The results of these capacity analyses indicate that excellent levels of service can be expected to prevail at the driveway, and that no undue delays to vehicles traveling on Factory Avenue will occur. In addition, the new traffic generated by the project will have minimal impact on operating cenditions at thgintersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue, and no deterioration in the levels of service at this intersection will occur during the three peak hours examined. Copies of the results of these intersection capacity analyses are attached. Conclusions 1. Although the site will generate additional traffic, this traffic can be adequately accommodated bY the existing roadway network. 2. Intersection Capacity analyses performed in accordance with the methodology sct forth in thc 2000 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual indicate t~at th~'ad~h'tional traffic generated by the proposed development will have minimal impact on operations at the signalized intersection of l~_uin goad at Factory Avenue. 3. In keeping with good access management practices, the site plan for the project proposes a single driveway on Main Road end a single driveway on Factory Avenue. One existing driveway on Main Road will be closed. 4. The access driveways will operato in a safe and ~ffieient manner, without eansing undue delays. 5. The applicant remaing willing to enter into a cross access arrangement with the adjacent shopping center property, at such time as the property owner would be willing to provide cross In light of the foregoing, and based on professional transportation engineering considerations, it is recommended that the proposed project be approved. Mr. Vivian July 12, 2006 Page 8 ff you have any questions or need any further information, please call me. Sincerely, Vincent Corraclo Senior Engineer / Senior Transportation Planner VC:as L206230 P26069 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, REGIONAL DIRECTOR July 7, 2006 Mr. Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp. 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Dear Mr. Kamath: STATE Of NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION TEN 1 ~.dot.state.ny.~ [ JUL l l 2 ~il Southoid ~ ~. l Plannin( B~ard Town of Southold June 22, 2006 Sub~ssion Proposed Site Plan for W~ex Proiect 9945 Main Road Site Plan Dated 11/22/05, Last Revision 5/30/06 Route 25, Southold SCTM 1000-142-1-27 Our Case No. 01-99P THOMAS J. MADISON, JR. COMMISSIONER We are writing to advise you that the Town of Southotd has informed us that you are proposing work at the subject site located on the northeast comer of Route 25 and Factory Ave. In order for you to initiate the Highway Work Permit process so we can provide a comprehensive review of this site please submit four (4) sets of plans that include all of the information noted on the attached checklist. The following items shall also be addressed by your submission: In recent years, many states have employed access management as a major technique to address conflicts between through traffic and that generated by developments. The goals of access management are to limit the number of access points, separate conflict points and remove turning traffic from through movements. New York State is utilizing this technique to minimize impacts to State highways. We recommend, therefore, that cross access to this site be obtained from adjacent properties. If this is not presently possible, it should be shown on the plans for implementation as part of future redevelopment. Work along this section of Route 25 was recently completed by the CVS opposite this site. As part of our review of the CVS site we recommended all access be removed from Route 25 as the site had access to the local road network. In the interest of public safety and increasing mobility along this busy corridor we recommend right turn ingress only for this site. The Route 25 access must be designed to promote that movement and the access radius shall be offset from the property line a minimum of five (5) feet as per our driveway policy. Please reference our Policy for access on our website at www.dot.state.n¥.us/traffic/safet¥/hwp/dwpolind.pdf so you can present us with a design that conforms to our policy requirements. Mr. Vivian Kamath July 7, 2006 Page 2 All traffic control signal equipment including underground conduit shall be shown on the plans. The following traffic signal notes shall also be included: a. The contractor shall be responsible for and shall replace all signal interconnect cable, detector cable, conduit and all underground accessory equipment damaged during construction. b. Prior to starting any work at this location, the contractor shall notify the New York State Department of Transportation that a tone-out of signal equipment is needed. c. All traffic signals shall be maintained in a traffic responsive operation and all interconnect, where existing, shall be maintained. The contractor shall pay a liquidated damages charge of $500.00 per calendar day if actuation and coordination is not maintained. A note shall be added to the plans requiring the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the Route 25 site frontage at the completion of construction. The plans appear to indicate on site runoff will enter the State highway ROW. Provisions shall be made to collect and contain all on site drainage. All proposed drainage features shall be submitted for our review along with the calculations supporting your proposal. 6. The plan must include the note "Repair existing shoulder, sidewalk and curbing as ordered by State Engineer." If appl!cable, a note shall be added to the plans stating "All sidewalk surfaces shall be given a slip resistant texture. A coarse broom finish perpendicular to the sidewalk slope is acceptable." 8. The ROW lines shall be clearly shown and called out on the plans. ROW markers shall be installed at the property limits along the State highway frontage and at any intermediary turning points along the State highway frontage in accordance with NYSDOT standard sheet M625-1R 1. Please include the appropriate detail. 10. Any utility work proposed in State Highway right-of-way will require separate application and submission of plans (installation details, restoration details and Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan - all referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) to our Riverhead Maintenance facility. The applicant may contact Mr. Kevin Matthaei at (631) 727-1731 for further directions regarding Utility Highway Work Permit (HWP) applications. The applicant should be made aware that utility I-1WP issuance is subject to issuance of the HWP required for site work. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or I495, whichever is farther south, north to Long Island Sound. Mr. Vivian Kamath July 7, 2006 Page 3 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By Shaik A. Saad SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachment cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold v/Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold Ms. Amy Ford, Senior Planner, Town of Southold SAS:MDW:SME 640 Sunrise Highway, West Babylon, New York 11 704 (631) 321-7777 Facsimile (631) 661-0486 June 27, 2006 Ms. Amy Ford Senior Planner Planning Board Town of Southold Post Office Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Ms. Ford: Warex Terminals Corp. Proposed Site Plan 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York S.C.T.M. Number 1000-142-1-27 matter. below. In order to assist you with your review, our responses to each of the Board's comments are provided 1. Dunn Engineering has been retained to provide the request traffic data. 2. The draft Covenants and Restriction are attached hereto. 3. The parking space dimensions have been added to the site plan. 4. The handicap-parking stall has been relocated and conforms to the New York State Building Code and ADA requirements. 5. The parking calculations have been revised as requested. 6. The requested dimensions have been added to the site plan. 7. The scale of the site plan has been changed as requested. Please review our submittal to your earliest convenience. Thank you for your assistance in this Transmitted herewith, for your review and approval, is one (1) set of drawings containing our response to the Planning Board's review comments contained in your June 22, 2006 letter to Mr. Vivan Kamath on the referenced project. Ms. Amy Ford 2 June 27, 2006 If have any questions or require additional information, please advise. Very truly yours, Sent By: J~LLP; 668; Jun-28 12:51FM; DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND REST]t~tCTIONS, This DECLARATION is raadc and dated thc day of .luly 2006 by War~x Terminals Co~p. P,O, Box 488 Newburgh, New York 12550 WHI~REAS, hereh-~attcr referred to as the Di~laram, WITNESSETI-I WHEREAS, thc undersigned is the owner o£parcel of land described as tbllows: SEE SCHEDULE '%". WHEREAS, aforesaid parcel Of Ia.ad is further identificxi by Suffolk County Tax Map Number(s): District 1000 Section 142.00 Block 01.00 Lot 027.00~ WHEREAS, D~clalrant has heretofore applied lo thc Planning Boaxd of the Term o£ Southold, Suffolk Cova~ty, New York, for approval for the aforesaid property, WHEREAS, the Plsnnlng Board of the Town of is desirous of imposing a cross over acvcss eascw_cnt ("casement") bcr~vecn thc above described pr~rnises and the premises adjoining to the east along Main Road, WHERI~AS, Declarant has submitted a site plan drawn by ~lonathv. n Huttick, Achit.*ct, dated lane 24, 2006 reQecting the location of said easement. WHEREAS, Declarant has attempted to secure ~aid caiement from the owner of the premises to the east, WHEREAS, the owner of the premises to the east has refused Io give consent to said ealem~t, WHt.~REAS, Decl'~rant herewith agrees to file a Covcnan! and Resection on tho above described property as required by thc Planning l~oard of the Town of Southold, WHEREAS, any violation of this Cov~nt and Res~icdon will immediately void thc approval issued by the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, NOW THEREFORE, said D©claranf makes the following declaration o£ Covenant and Restriction lo the land heretofore d~scribed: Page 2/5 Sent By: JSHLLP; Jun~ t2:52FM; Declarant agrees that if, at some point in the future, consent to the ea~waont described in the Hut'rick Plan ia obtained from th© owner of the pren~se;a to thc east, Declarant will execute any and itll documeazt$, subject to reasonable objections thereto, n0cessary to effectuate said easement. Said easement to be installed at no co~t to Declarant its heirs, successors or assigns. Page 3/5 If the parties hereto, or say of them, their l~ir~, successors, or a.~ignees shall violate or attempt to violate any of thc cov~umt~ herein, it shall be lawful for thc Town oF Southold to prosecute any proceedings at law o! in equity against the person or persons violating or attempting to violate any such ¢o¥¢nants either 1o prevent him or them so doing or to recover damages or some other r~lief for such violation. Invalidation of any of these covenants by judgment or court shall in no way affect any of the other provisiom which shall remain in full force and eff~t. Thc own& r~erves for lfiimelf and his distributees, executors, administrators, successors, and asst., the righl to terminate and amend thc covenants herein set forth upon prior approval of the Plluming of the Town of Southold, ~4375 State Rout~ 25, Southold, Suffolk County, Nm' York. This d~claration of covenants ghall run with the land mad sh~ll be binding upon thc owner and his diatributoes, executor~, adm~nistralors, successors and assigns. iN WITNE.qS THEREOF, the Declarant has caused this insmunent to be executod the day ~md year first above written WAREX TERMINALS CORP. By: $OANNE CONLEY, Vice President 8e~t By; J~NLLP~ 668; Jun- )6 12:52PM; Page 4/5 CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF NEW YOKK) ) COUNTY OF ) On thc ~ dss of July, 2006, before mc personally came Jo~mc Conley to me known, who, being duly sworn, did depose and say that hetshc resides in Suffolk County, State of New York, that sM is the Vice-President of Warex Terminals Corp., the corporation described in and which executed the abox, c instrument; that he/sh© knows thc s~al of said corporation; thai the seal affixed to ~aid i~trum~t is such corpora[e seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporaiion, and that heJshe signed hlrdhcr thereto by like o~dcr, Sworn to before mc this __ day of Suly, 2006 Notary Public Bent By: JBHLLP; 668; Jun SCHEDULE "A' 36 12:5@F~; Page 5/5 At.i. that oerlain plot, piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the hamlet of Mattituck, Town of $outhold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being more pa,'licularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point at thc northeast comer of an intvrseetion formed by thc north side of Main Road (Sta~e Route 25) and the east s/dc of Factory Avenue; RUNNING THENCE in an northerly direction, along thc easterly side of Factory Avenue, North 20 degrees 22 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of' 150.00 feet to a point: RUNNING THENCE in an easterly direction, North 48 degrees 57 minutes 30 second~ e~t, a distance of 146.00 f~t to a point; RUNNING THENCE in a westerly direction, South 40 degrees 39 minutes 45 cast, a diatance of 140.34 fe~t to apoim; RUNNING THENCE in a ~outhwe~erly diteetio~ along the northerly side of Mam Road (Stem Rnute 25), South 48 degrees 57 minutes 30 s~conds west, a d/stance of 198.t10 feet to the poim or place of BEGINNING. A*n'ITUCK FIRE DISTRICI PO BOX 666, PIKE STREET MA'I'nTUCK, NEW YORK 11952-0666 Norman A. Rellly, Jr,, Chairman James D. Roach,, Vice Chairman Maltln / Griffin, Sr. JMome Zuhoskl David F. Haas June 28, 2006 Ms. Amy Ford Senior Planner Southold Town PIonning Board P 0 Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 RE: SCTM# 1000-142-1-27 Dear Ms. Ford, Secretmy, John C. Harrison Treasurer, B~d~m A. DIckemon At the Regular meeting of the Board of Fire Commissioners, the Board reviewed the site plan for Warex Project (SCI'M# 1000-142-1-27) at your request. That as SCWA Hydrants are located along the SCWA main running along Rte. 25 (Main Road) & Factory Ave, that no additional water supply is required; however they recommend that all drives and roads meet the Southold Town Requirement for clearance of roads and right of ways. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. Secretary/Fire District Manager cc: Board of Fire Commissioners Chief Office (631) 298-8837 Facsimile (631) 298-8841 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 June 22, 2006 Suffolk County Planning Commission Mr. Andrew P. Freleng, AICP, Chief Planner FI. Lee Dennison bldg., 42 Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Planning Commission Comments on the Site Plan for Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zoning District: General Business Dear Mr. Freleng, Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan is being referred to you for comments. Attached are the site plan, EAF and site plan application. This site phn is for the proposed re-constmction of a gas station in order to remove the existing automotive service station, expand the existing convenience store, reconstruct the existing gas pump canopy and add a car wash, with a total build out of 3,168 sq. ft. including a change in parking from 5 existing parking spaces to 12 parking spaces, on .55 acres in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e comer of NYS Road 25 and FactoryAvenue known as 9945 Main Road in Mattituclc SCTM #: 1000-142~1-27. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.n~ and 4:00 p.m. Senior Planner Cc: File Enc. 1 site plan prepared by Eugene Kempey last revised May 30, 2006. Various attachments PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND June 22, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Neboysha Brashich Southold Transportation Committee 175 Emory Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM#: 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Brashich: Enclosed please find a site plan application and one (1) site plan prepared by Eugene Kempeylast revised May 30, 2006 for the above reference project. This site plan is for the proposed re-construction of a gas station in order to remove the existing automotive service station, expand the existing convenience store, reconstruct the existing gas pump canopyand add a car wash, with a total build out of 3,168 sq. ft. including a change in parking from 5 existing parking spaces to 12 parking spaces, on .55 acres in the General Business Zone located on the rv's/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e comer of NYS Road 25 and FacmryAvenue known as 9945 Main Road in Mattiruck SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27. The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for your review and recommendations. Thank you for your cooperation. Senior Phnner Cc: File Enc.: 1 site plan prepared by Eugene Kempeylast revised May 30, 2006. Site plan application PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 June 22, 2006 John C. Harrison Mattituck Fire District P.O. Box 666 Mattituclg New York 11952 Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Dear Mr. Han'ison: Enclosed please find a site plan application and one (1) site plan prepared by Eugene Kempeylast revised May 30, 2006 for the above reference project. This site plan is for the proposed re-constmction of a gas station in order to remove the existing automotive service station, expand the existing convenience store, reconstruct the existing gas pump canopy and add a car wash, with a total build out of 3,168 sq. ft. including a change in parking from 5 existing parking spaces to 12 parking spaces, on .55 acres in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e comer of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue known as 9945 Main Road in Matdtuck. SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27. The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations. Thank you for your cooperation. Verytruly yours, Senior Planner Cc: File Eric.: 1 site plan prepared byEugene Kempeylast revised May30, 2006. Site plan application PLANNING BOARD MEMBE9 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Frorrg Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Impector James Richter, Town Engineer Mark Ten'y, Local Water Revitalization Program Coordinator Amy Ford, Senior Planner,~ Date: June 22, 2006 Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattimck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan and application. The site plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. This site plan is for the proposed re-construction of a gas station in order to remove the existing automotive service stafton, expand the existing convenience store, reconstruct the existing gas pump canopy and add a car wash, with a total build out of 3,168 sq. ft. including a change in parking from 5 existing parking spaces to 12 parking spaces, on .55 acres in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e comer of NYS Road 25 and Factory Avenue known as 9945 Main Road in Mattituck. SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27. The enclosed site plan is for your review and records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Eric.: File 1 site plan prepared byEugene Kempey last revised May 30, 2006. Site plan application LWRP ConsistencyAssessment Form (LWRP Coordinator only) PLANNING BOARD MRMBE~ dERILY~ B. WOODHOUSE ~hair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Engineer From: Amy Ford, Senior Planner~(~ Date: June 22, 2006 Southold Town LWRP Coordinator Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC- Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation* Suffolk County Water Authority Architectural Review Committee Agency referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXV 100-254, Review Procedure part C, the Planning Board refers this site plan for concerns comments and jurisdiction requirements, if applicable. Dear Reviewer. The site plan status is a New Active Site Plan. Below is site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Warex Project 9945 Main Road, Mattituck SCTM#: 1000-142-1-27 This site plan is for the proposed re-construction of a gas station in order to remove the existing automotive service station, expand the existing convenience store, reconstruct the existing gas pump canopy and add a car wash, with a total build out of 3,168 sq. ft. including a change in parking from 5 existing parking spaces to 12 parking spaces, on .55 acres in the General Business Zone located on the n/s/o New York State Road 25, on the n/e comer of NYS Road 25 and FactoryAvenue known as 9945 Main Road in Mattituck. SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27. Attached is a copy of the site plan application for your review. Thank you in advance. Cc: File Enc.: Site plan application *1 site plan prepared by Eugene Kempey last revised May 30, 2006 is enclosed for your review APPE~;~LS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman Mailing Address: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road · P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 , · TOWN MEMO - FROM: Ruth D. Oliva, ZBA Chairwoman dUN 2 3 DATE: June 21, 2006 Southold Town Plan~i~ 8oarfl SUBJECT: Request for Comments Our Department has received and is reviewing the following application, and enclose copies of the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, and application with the applicant's latest map. The Planning Board may be involved under the ~it~ ~i~ review steps under Chapter 100 (Zoning), and your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience. NAME TAX#/ ZBA BD NOD VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE_ DATE DATE STAMPED Your comments are appreciated by July 15, 2006 Thank you. FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: December 27, 2005 REVISED: December 28, 2005 RENEWED: April 26, 2006 TO: Warex Terminal Corp. 9945 Route 25 Mattituck, NY 11952 Please take notice that your application dated December 7, 2005 For permit to add a convenience store use and a car wash bay for a car wash use in an existing gas station at Location of property: 9945 Route 25, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 142 Blockl Lot 2._~7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this 24,829 square foot parcel in the B District, is not permitted pursuant to Article X Section 100-102, which states; "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet, following the proposed construction, the building will have a side yard setback of+/- 2 feet. In addition, the proposed car wash use requires special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Bot~re~u~te plan approval from the J ^utho z d S atur - Southold Town Planning Board. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A., PLANNING APPLICATION TO THE SO Fee: $ Filed By: Office Notes: ParcelLocation: House No.~Street SCTM 1000 Section [4Z Block [ Lot(s). 1 (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETER DATED: App lie ant/-6~n~'~(s)~ Address: Telephone: NOTE: If applicant is not the ?wner, state if applicant is o Authorized Representative: Address: ~ Telephone: ~ 3 ['- r~~ ~--~- C Pleas~specify who you wish correspondem ~3' Applicant/Ow ner (s) [] Authorize~ WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR FOR: ~ufiding Permit [] Certificate of Occupancy [] Change of Use [] Permit for As-Built Cons~ Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appeal, of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not] Article r~c Section Type of Appeal.. An Appeal is re. adc for: ~'A Van. ante to the Zoning Code ( [3 A Variance due to lack of access [] Interpretation of the Town Code [] Reversal or Other A prior appeal [] has,has not been made w No. Year TFHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS ~ce Use Only Date Assigned/Assignment No. ~_9r 0 · ~3-~.~. tl~__Lot Size ~IINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR k etb be mailed to, from the above listed names: t Representative ~ Other: DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED [ ~ /~l° [] Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ruction ..d. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph luote the code. t00- t'v~ Subsection · Zoning Map. equired by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. .rticle Section respect to this property UNDER Appeal ~age 2 of 3 - Appeal Application Part A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS, (attach (1) An undesirable change will not be prod~ detriment fo nearby properties, if grant, ed, b (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CA applicant fo pu~ue, other than an area vari (3) The umounf of relief requesfed (4) The valance will NOT have an advers~ condi~ons Jn the neighborhood or (5) ~as the variance been self-created? exis,ng, as buil~ ( ) Yes, or ( ) No. (6} Additional information about the surrou the difficulty in meeting, the code requlrem~ :tra sheet as needed): ~ced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a ~NOT be achleved by some me.od feasible for ance, because: ~ P~¢~t /J¢~ ~ effect or impact on ~e physical or environmenh (~) Yes, or ( ) No. If not, Is the constucflo ding topography and building areas that relate to nfs: (attach extra sheet as needed) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary an~l adequate, and' at the same time preserves. protects .the character of the nelghborl~ood and the health, safety, and welfare or commumty. / ( ) Check this box and complefe PARTy, Questions on next Page to apply USE VARIANC STANDARDS· (:Please consulf your attorne ,) O. fhe~:w.~,, i~lease proceed fo f,~ si,qnafure an notary area below. "// /)/V ' k'. ~ ~=dff~e of ~'~pellant o~ Auth°~zed Agertl _Sworn to before me th. is /(,~ ent must submit Authorization from Owner) ~'~ (Notary Publi~') ~]IA ApF 9/30/02 ~r. rJl~ ~ BUOLINO Notary PubUc, Stltte of New York No. 01BL16008268 t~ified in Suffolk County C~m~ic~ Expires 09 ! 08 ! Page 3 of 3 - Appeal Application Part B: REASONS FOR USE VARIANCE For Each and Every Permitted Use under the Project is Located (please consult yo 1. Applicant cannot realize a reasonabl, zoning regulations for the particular dlsfri competent financial evidence. The apPl (describe on a separate sheet). The alleged hardship relating fo the p 3. The alleged hardship does not apply' because: 4. The request will not alter the essential ~cluesfed): he Zoning Regulations for the Particular District Whe · attorney before completing): 'eturn for each and every permitted use under the =t where the property is located, demonstrated by cant CANNOT realize a REASONABLE RETURN becm =petty is unique because: o a substantial portion of the district or neighborhoc character of the neighborhood because: 5. The alleged hardship has not been self-created because: 6. This Is the minimum relief necessary, character of the neighborhood, and the explain on a separate sheet if necessary.) 7. The spirit of the ordinance will be ob~ substantial justice will be done because ( ) Check this box and complete VARIANCE STANDARDS. (Please consu si,qnature and notary area below. hota...yS,ATJ-t~ ~ BUOLI~O Public, State ~New York No. 01BU609~68 ~ ~ S~o~ ~ ~en ~ ~1 ~1~ ~m fo be~re me this / (.ota. Publlcy vhile af the same time preserving and I'~rotecfing health, safely and welfare of the community. (Plea.~ .,rVed, public safely and welfare will be secured, an (Please explain on a separate sheet if necessary.) PART A, Questions on previous page fo apply,* your attorney.) Otherwise, please proceed to I~nafUre of Appellant or Aufhoflzec~ Agent I~gent must submit Autho~aflon from Owner) ZBA App JONATHAN HUTTICK ' ARCHITECT 640 SUNRISE HIGHWY W BABYLON NY 11704 T 631 321 7777 F 631 661 0486 ISSUED FOR FILING: MAY. 30.2006 DOB NOV. 22.2005 DOB REVISED: 05-30--06 E.R. PLANNING BOARD MEMB JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 June 22, 2006 Vivian Kamath DSC Construction Corp 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, New York 11704 Rel Proposed site plan for Warex Project · 9945 Main Road, Mattituck, New York SCTM #: 1000-142-1-27 Zone: General Business Dear Mr. Kamath, In reviewing the site plan application materials submitted to the office on June 7, 2006, the Planning Board held a work session on June 12, 2006 and accepted this application. The site plan application will need to include the following to continue processing: After an initial review of your application, the Planning Board has serious concems regarding addkional traffic generated in this area and its impact on the surrounding comrnurfity. Please provide this office with a traffic srudyof the site including existing hourly trip generation and proposed furore trip generation. · As per Town Code ~100-191 (O), the Planning Board, after reviewand discussion, is requiring cross over access with the adjoining lot to the east. Please supply a copy of the draft Covenants & R~estricdons to this Department for a cross easement and revise the proposed site plan to reflect the agreement. Once received, a copywill be forwarded to the Town Attorney for review and approval prior to filing with the Suffolk County Clerk · Parking spaces must complywith Town Code $100-191 (C) which states that all parking stalls must be a minimum of 9' x 19' and dimensions should be shown on the plan. · All handicap parking stalls and access aisles must comply with New York State Code and ADA requirements. · Site plan build out detailing a break down of all existing and proposed uses bysquare foot, including anyproposed office and/or storage. Please be aware this mayrequire adjustments to the parking and should reflect any changes. · Please show dimensions for all aisles, curb cuts, cleared distances, etc. Warex Project Page Two June 22, 2006 In addition, please be aware the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval states approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals will be necessaryprior to ske plan approval. Please forward a copyof the ZBA decision upon receipt. This ts to notifyyou that the Planning Department will need to obtain the following approvals and/or comments before the Plann/ng Board can approve this site plan: Suffolk County Planning Department, LWRP, Mattituck Fire Department, Town Engineer, Southold Town Building Department and Architectural Review Committee. You are required to verify agency requirements, submit required agency documents and obtain approvals from the Southold Town ZBA, New York State Department of Transportation, Suffolk County Department of Health Services and Suffolk CountyWater Authority. In order for the Planning Board and staff to better review your site plan, we request any furore site plans be scaled at 1" -- 10' rather than the required 1" -- 20' as stated in the code. As a courtesy, you maysubmit one (1) sketch revised site plan incorporating all of the above referenced changes to this Department for an initial review prior to submitting all of the necessary copies. Once the Planning Board has reviewed and accepted the necessary changes, please submit the required copies of the revised site plan to this office so that it may be distributed to all necessary agencies. Please also accept this as notice that your application will be presemed at the next meeting of the Architectural Review Committee on July 13, 2006. Please refer to the ARC checklist in the site plan application packet for a list of all necessary items for ARC to complete a review of your property. Please revise your construction plans to include these items including colors, signs, lighting, etc. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions or need further assistance. Sincerely, Senior Planner Enc: File Planning Board Zoning Board of Appeals Mark Wolfgang, New York State Department of Transportation P.O. Box 418 Mattituck, N.Y. 11952-0418 June 20, 2006 George Solomon, Planning Board Southold Town Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Dear Mr. Solomon: Last week while reading the Suffolk Times I was amazed by your comment on two planning board items. You gave the same answer for both the Cutchogue 55 and over housing and the Mattituck car wash, both of which are of interest to me. The 55 and over housing keeps coming up over and over with no results. We have within the town affordable housing for our young people so they stay, but the town never seems to resolve anything so we older folk can stay. I had hoped to stay in my home as I grew older but between costs (which include a $7,000. tax bill and no relief in sight) and not being able to do as much on my own I decided several years ago a condominium would be the way to go. However, Southold town offers very little in that regard, in fact since the Cutchogue idea was first mentioned many 55 and over developments have gone up along Middle Road in Riverhead. How is it that Southold is so far behind? Now you propose a traffic study. Let us get real here. If you put up 139 units and most people drive you will have at least another 139 cars in the area. Move on and do something for us older people who have lived here for many years and want to stay. Otherwise, I along with many other will just have to pursue living somewhere else where the cost of living and property taxes are not so high and there is 55 and over housing. As far as the car wash, I would never deny anyone the right to try to improve or expand their business, but we really do not need anything else at the intersection of Route 25, Factory Avenue and Sigsbee Road and there again you proposed a traffic study. Why would you even think that, much less say it? As far as I known, two traffic studies were done one for CVS and one for the Cottages at Mattituck affordable housing. So guesstimate how many cars will be washed, add it to the existing studies and move on. Stop wasting time and spending money on studies. Use common sense and if you feel the car wash is warranted put it up to community vote or just approve it with the State and Town restructuring traffic flow. By just being a licensed driver I already without the car wash see problems now with that comer. Also, make a positive decision about housing for those of us who want to stay and are over 55 before we are forced out. Finally let me say, please do not suggest that I attend the meetings at town hall, as I already told Mr. Russell when he spoke at the Mattituck - Laurel Library, many of us work and cannot get to Town Hall before 6:00 P.M. so writing is our only alternative. Cordially, Roberta M. Kalous cc: Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Eileen Duffy, Associate Editor, the Suffolk Times Submission Without a Cover Letter Subject: . ~ ' SCTM#: 1000- ~q,'-Z-' ~, ' ~q ' Date: Comments: FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: December 27, 2005 REVISED: December 28, 2005 TO: Warex Terminal Corp. 9945 Route 25 Mattituck, NY 11952 Please take notice that your application dated December 7, 2005 For permit to add a convenience store use and a car wash bay for a car wash use in an existing gas station at Location of property: 9945 Route 25, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 142 Blockl Lot 2'1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this 24,829 square foot parcel in the B District, is not permitted pursuant to Article X Section 100-102, which states; "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows a minimum single side yard setback of 25 feet, following the proposed construction, the building will have a side yard setback of+/- 2 feet. In addition, the proposed car wash use requires special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Both proposed uses require site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. Town of Southold - Proposed Site Plan Warex Project Tax Map # 1000-142-1-27 Town of Southold - Proposed Site Plan Warex Project '06 Tax Map # 1000'142,1~27 9945 Main Road, Mattimck Warex Project Tax Map # 1000-142-1-27 Alternate Rendering - Warex Project 26.95 x 24~01 ,.*~ · .N 48'57'30~ £ ~: X 24~7 48'57'30" W ~ ELEC X 17.41 146,00 _%0 X 16.92 MAIN x16JO LO 198.00 ROAD (S.R. z8) 19.27 AREA: 24,140.48 sq ff 0.55 ACRE DATUM: NGVD 29 C~HuFIED TO: SUFFOLK COL NTY TA~ MAP · STAKE 0 PIPE DIST. SEC. BLK. LOT [J ~ · MONUMEN~ 1000 142 0,1 27 VOLLMUTH ~ BRUSH N.Y.S. Lic. No. 04-9697 ' I ~ .LUE Po,.r ^~NUE MAP OF LAND LOCATED AT· BLUEPOINT, N.Y.11715 · PP' FAK (~31)3~1-~062 'k ./~ E. mQih ~eomelvollbnmh,com MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHHOLD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK D°te2/16/060 Scale: Job No. 1 "=20' 060 '] 3 , GEOI~E T. BRUSH.P.LS. / I ASPHALT PARKING ' ~!~!':7¢~, ~~~ ,~,~;~ ! "~',,¢~ ~1~,,~] // / /~ ~'% TPFE & X ~ .... 0 ~ZERO DSCHARGE CAR WASH WATER ~u. ene ~. ~emnev ,t,,,v~ ',",~ ,~.: ~~ .~;.~ ~,*~, r ~ / //~ ~/ / ~X..JEL 20.67 ~ 0 RECLAIMATION SYSTEM} "',, '~: ,'~ ,', ,'~,' ~ ~;2, ~ ~ ~(~ / //~' /~ / / ~ WALL c,~ Professional Eng~eer ' .~,',.:3 .¢~4.'b~!;?, q"t' '., ,.~,~,: ;d'~ *.i 51¢~¢~¢ ¢i2( - ~- ~ ...... - ................. ' ','? ','~,~,' ~~{,¢~ %'~"~,,~.'¢ ~;~'~1 / ~' ¢/ / %" ~ BW 1877 CONC RETAINNG WA~L BW 18.96 0.7E 640 S~ise .... .4~. ~,,,.~¢~ ~~ [~ ~ / // West Babylon,~ 11704 ~ ~,.~ ~:~ ~.~ ~~ ~ ~}~ / // Telephone: 631.321.7777 . ~. ~¢~.>;.,::~,? ~~ ~¢~ ~'~ // EL 22.62 ,,' .:;~,. ,,;',,~;',,¢,',:¢ ~I~ ~:¢:~ ~. ~',~ / // Fax: 631.661.0486 .... , ~,.. -, ,... ,. .... ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ 8.~&01 P~limint~ 8itc Plan Submi~l ~~ ~ ~ o ~ 7.~0.07 Revised ilevation~ 2 ~ ~ ~~~ '*~'" ~ ~ ~/ z 8.13.07 Zoning Boa~ Submiffal 3 ~ A P ~ / d ~ ~ ~ 8.20.07 Full Si~ Plan Submit~l 4 SCALE AS NOTED ¢~ ~, ~ ~' ' / ~'/ ~ / . / ~/.. ~, ,~ :~.~, / / ~/ ~ ~ ~ ' __ ....... L ....... ~ ~ .~.oo ' ~ ..... / ~/ ~' ~'¢ co~ s.-z.~. SP-Zbl PARKING CALCU~TIONS __ D~INAGE CALCU~TIONS / SANITARY CALCU~TIONS ~ ALL SITE iNFORMATION IS BASED UPON ~NDSCAPE SCHEDULE ~ A SURVEY DATED 02/16/06, JOB N0. ~6013, BY: DETAILS ~ ~' ~ ' ~u UM 4 I > -~ I ' I ~ FOZZ~¢~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ¢ ~ I / I ~ ~ ' ~ ~ A-1 FRONT ELEVATION / , ~ u 2~0 .~VE..~ REAR ELEVATION ~ w ~//// ..~ z~,o/ ~ ~ ~ I 1.6 ¢ COVER - % ~ ~ C 25 59 ~ TW 21.86 ~ m (~¢-~o~ ~19, 72 ~ ~.[,: ~,o~,~,~.,.,~ A-2 LE~ ELEVATION I~ '~ RIGHT ELEVATION ,, , , __ m~ % ~ ~ (TYP ~ INLET EL 2~.58 II CONCRETE ~' ?~ ~ * '/ TO 26.00 0 536 . ,, ,C 246 O ~ ' ~ ' ' ~ ~ l ''~6Y ~ SEAL NYT543 // 26 95 OWNER: WAREX TERMI~LS CORP. P.O. BOX ~EWBU~H, NY 12550 t~ / PROJ~ CAR WASH / GAS STATION . . ~ ~ /~ MAIN RD. & FACTORY - %~ AVENUE 'x 26,92~ I~ ~ MA~ITUCK, NY / ~ / ~=~~'~ DBL 'YELLOW LINE = ~ / o / DBL YELLOW LINE ~~ : , /// ~M / 25.03 DBL YELLOW LINE '21.55 SITE FOR TE ALS GAS STATION ., SP-Zb SC E: 1" - AREA NAME AREA SIZE CODE REQ. REQUIRED PROPOSED Eugene G. Kempey CONVENIENCE STORE, 861 SQ.FT. 1 SPACE / 200 SQ.FT. 5 SPACES 5 SPACES STORAGE 285 SQ.FT. 1 SPACE / 1000 SQ.FT. 1 SPACES 1 SPACE ~t > ,~, Professional Engineer GAS STATION 2 EMPLOYEES 1 SPACE PER EMPLOYEE 2 SPACES 2 SPACES 4 PUMPS 3 CAR QEUEING PERPU1VIP 12 CARS 12 CARS TOTAL 12 SPACES INCLUDING 640 Sunrise Highway I 1 HANDICAPPED West Babylon, NY 11704 I ,~,=~ ~ ~: ,~., Telephone: 631.321.7777 . ~, . ,..~ .~ . Fax: 631.661.0486 CAI,CULATIONS FOR STORM WATER RUN-OFF RETENTION ~ " "' ' ~L~__~ EXISTING AREA RUN-OFF COEFF.FT. OF RAIN CU.FT. RETENTION REQ'D '%~'~d~'~'~ -~ ~ "~ ' - ~,-~--o~,m~,.?, ,~.,.'~.~m. ~ ~,~m~__~ ' ~' REVISIONS: -~ {'" ~, if otmlmv^Lm,."r/ "~'~'""~' date description no. PAVEMENT 15,034 SQ.FT. 1.0 .167 2,511 CU.FT. ~ ( _ ~ 5.13.o7 Preliminary Site Plan Submittal LANDSCAPE 4,637 SQ.FT. .25 .167 194 CU.FT. TABLEA { ~ ~ BUILDING 4,422 SQ.FT. 1.0 .167 739 CU.FT. v v ~ 7AO.07 Revised E{evaflons 2 8.13.07 Zoning Board Subm{tts{ 3 3,444CU.FT. ,2, v ~ ~~--~.~ -.- ' ' · ' ' ) 8,20.07 Fu{{ Site Plan Submittal 4 PROPOSED AREA RUN-OFF COEFF.FT. OF RAIN CU.FT. RETENTION REQ'D '- "*~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ { PAVEMENT lS,775 SO.VT.1.0 .167 2,634 CU.FT. LANDSCAPE 2,353 SQ.FT. .25 .167 98 CD.FT. CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK BUILDING 6,012 SQ.FT. 1.0 .167 1,004 CU.FT.~ ~rs 3,736 CU.FT./ 2 ~ TYPICAI~ GRF, ASE TRAP NTS 3,736 - 3,444 ~ 292 CU. FT. ADDITIONAL OF STORAGE REQUIRED ~SP-Zbl/ (2) RING ~ 10'-0" 13 x 8' DEEP = 1,094.8 CU. FT. OF STORAGE~ USTOF DRAWmOS: sheet description SANITARY WASTE CALCULATIONS: SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OTHER THAN SINGLE FAMH ,Y RESIDENCES ~ ~-~ SP-Zb KEY MAP X', / %% SITE PLAN AREA NAME AREA SIZE DESIGN FLOW: DESIGN FLOW: DESIGN FLOW: DESIGN FLOW: /~ / / ~ ~ SP-Zbl PARKING CALCULATIONS // LA.DSCAPESCHEUU,E CONVENIENCE STORE 1,266 .03 GPD/SF = 38 GPD ,02 GPD/SF = 25 OPD .05 OPD/SF = 63 GPD 63 OPD~ ~ // DETAILS ~..~ -~ ~ A-1 FRONT ELEVATION ~ ~ REAR ELEVATION CAR WASH BAY 969 .04 OPD/SF* = 39 GPD NA .04 GPD/SF* = 39 GPD 39 OPD A-2 LEFT ELEVATION ._--~---'~'" '~"~'~ ~,~'~' RIGHT ELEVATION TOTAL FLOWS: 77 OPD 25 GPD 102 GPD 102 GPD ~.~,~.X ~ ~ ~ ~,. ,~ ALLOWABLE DENSITY' = 0.55 ACRES X 600 GPD = 330 GPD ..... PROPOSED SANITARY FLOW OF 77 GPD IS < THE ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM SANITARY FLOW. -~,.,~ 1. *DENOTES THAT WATER TO WASH CARS IS EXCLUDED FROM THIS CALCULATION. [] ~" '~ - 2. CAR WASH WATER TO BE FILTERED AND RECYCLED THROUGH AN ON-SITE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPAR~T OF HEALTH [] m ,, APPROVED ZERO DISCHARGE SYSTEM. [] m ,, 3. REQUIRED SEPTIC TANK (2 DAYS) X 198 GALS. = 396 GALS., MINIMUM REQUIR SEPTIC TANK IS 900 GALS. [] m ,, 4. SUPPLY (1) 8'-0" DIAMETER X 4'-0" LIQUID DEPTH (2) CHAMBER SEPTIC TANK AT 1,264 GALLONS 5. EXISTING LEACHING POOLS TO HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE WALL AREA OF 300 SQ.FT., PROVIDE (1) 8'-0" DIAMETER X 12'-0" LIQUID ~ i i ' ........ AND BE SURROUNDED WITH A THREE FOOT CRUSHED GRAVEL / SAND COLLAR. - - - - ! 'r~.. LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE .... ,,.~'fo°~ha"~', ~o,o~,.~. KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMIVlON NAME SIZE QUANflTY'~ ,hall°Undlllonsl~ raallone{bleand ~}m~{[l mlml~ns for fie{e{andllt (~) TSUGA CANADENSIS HEMLOCK 30" dim 81 (~ RHODODENDRON PRINOPHYLLUM AZALEA 18"-24' H 17 TYPICAL LEACHING POOL NTS SEAL (~) THUJA OCCIDENTALIS NIORA AMERICAN ARBOR. VITAE 7'H 54 Project (~) CHRYSANTHEMUM NIPPON MONTAULK DAISY 24" di~. 32 OWNER: WAREX TERMINALS CORP. P.O. BOX 488 NEWRURGH, NY 12550 PHONE: 845.561.4000 PROJECT: CAR WASH / GAS STATION MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY SCTM 200-514-2-5&6 drawing no. date 06-13-07 .e ASNOTED SP-Zbl drawn by E.R. BOI1ARD! TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION (Loor.~o ~O~T~AST) SCALE: 3/16"= 1' IOpOF C~ REAR ELEVATION 0~oomo soumms~ SCALE: 3/16"= 1' Eugene G. Kempey Professional Engineer 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Telephone: 631.321.7777 Fax: 631.661.0486 REVISIONS: date description 6.13.07 Preliminary Site Plan Submittal 7.10.07 Revised Elevations 8.13,07 Zoning Board Submittal 8.20.07 Full Site Plan Submittal LIST OF DRAWINGS: sheet description SP-Zb KEY MAP SITE PLAN SP-Zbl PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SANITARY CALCULATIONS LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE DETAILS A-1 FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION A-2 LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION SEAL Project OWNER: WAREX TERMINALS CORP. P.O. BOX 488 NEWBURGH, NY 12550 PHONE: 845.561.4000 PROJECT: CAR WASH / GAS STATION MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY SCTM 200-514-2-5&6 date 06-13-07 scale AS NOTED drawn by E.R. drawing no. A-1 ~'~ 640 Sunrise Highway } ~ ~mouo~o~ R~ISIONS: date deaaription no. h ~o~or~, ~ 6.13.07 Pmlimina~ Site Plan Submiffal ~ ~ ~ 7A0.07 Raviaod Elevations 2 ~a~ ~ ~ 8A3.07 Zonin9 Boa~ 8ubmiRal ~ } 8.20.07 Full $ito Plan $ubmit~l 4 ~SIDE ELEVATION eDema SO~AS~ ~'-~'~ LIST OF D~WINGS: SCALE: 3/16''= 1' ,~,.t d~=iption SP-Zb KEY MAP SITE P~N SP-Zbl PARKING CALCU~TIONS D~INAGE CALCU~TIONS SANITARY CALCU~TIONS ~NDSCAPE SCHEDULE DETAILS A-1 FRONT ELEVATION R~R EL~ATION A-2 LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION ~ OWNER: WAR~ TERMINALS CORP. ~o~ ~ ~' P.O. BOX 488 - ay,. NEWBURGH, NY 12550 mm~ r*'x~'*'~ ~ m~ PROJECT: CAR WASH / GAS STATION ~mm*~ AVENUE SIDE ELEVATION ¢oomoso~s~ MATTITOGK, NY '~ SCALE: 3/16''= 1' 8GTM 200~4-2-5&6 dm~n6 no. amle AS NOTED ~ 1 drawn by E.R. E_BY MAP SCALE AS NOTED STOP CROS X 26.92 STOP L98 SWALK NYT343 26.95 / / / / / / / / / EL 22,62 LIL13 MH EL. TC 24.83 8C .% (~) EL ,25,69 CO/VER EL'~22.53 GRATE 24.70 TC 25.89 BO 25.59 C0VF.a 24,8' BC 24.31 '/ EL X 24,91 2'¢ EL 10" TREE 20.80 (LOT 27) TC X 25,28 TC 26.00 6.00 COLUk EL, 24 cf ~.~ CUT TO BE / QlC" TREE EL 20.67 EL TOG n) INLET -ST, ~ 8' DIA, ~k 6' D, 10" TREE EL 20.15 24.69 TC 19.35 18.7; BC GAS PUMP ASPHALT · ZERO DISCHARGE CAR WASH WATER RECLAIMATION SYSTEM- rw 21,92 TW 21,92 BW 18.77 CONC RETAINING W,~ BW 18.96 PARKING WALL CRNR 1.0'N O. TE (1) (2) 14'-11" 25'-5" PROPOgED W.I B, PROPOAED 16'-0" (4) EXISTING GAS PUMP ISLAND- BC BC 24,96 TC Ye COVER EL 25.13 24.63 TOG INLET -10' ¢ x 8' D. L.P. .75'¢ COVER EL 24.77 25.00 TC .36 BC L96x CONC CU~ WHITE L~ 24,78 NIGHT ~PRO~D /LIN~ OF E~STING CANOPY ABOVE 24.94 (2) (5) BOL ~,RD (TYP) CONCRETE PAD (8) (11) 51'-3" 2J39 66.1' CONC. WALK -,X EL 4.83 'X EL 24., 3'¢ CO\ j/X TC COVER 1.6'¢ COVER I 3'¢ COVER 24.77 EL 24.87 I EL 24.67 i ® 1.6'¢ COVER / .75'¢ COVER I I 3'¢ COVER EL 24.57 I I EL 24.48 I ?o ' 24.40 ............ L6'~ COVER TC 25.06 EL 24,57 TC ~.86 BC FTOG (4) ]INLET EL, ~ ~.92 2' 2' ~ x COVEE EL 23.92 ~ Iff-O" ~ ~ PRO~S~ ~ ~ ~ ~s~ // ~CLOS~~ ' 10' x LIGHT 8' D. ~.P, EL iNLET EL. ~ ~ PHONE 22.80 %/- %2' x 2' 25.59 .~4 ~ ~ ~ TC :~ D, LP. 3RATE 98.0( \ \ \ \ \ \ \ MAIN ROAD LINE ---------'-'~ 4, 96 / co TURNING ' LANE o ~: 26,28 DBL YELLOW LINE o 25.03 SITE PLAN FOR WAREX TERMINALS GAS STATION SCALE: 1" - 10'-0" WHIITE LINE DBIL YELLOW LINE DBL YELLOW LINE TW 21.87 BW 18.66 TW 21.89 BW 18,92 o TO 25.74 TW 21.87 ~/~ BW 19.57 ,~ COVER EL 24.61 TW 21.86 BW 19.72 dI-, 0 TC ALL SITE INFORMATION IS BASED UPON A SURVEY DATED 02/16/06, JOB NO, 06013, BYI ,~VOZZMUTH ~ BRUSH 200 BLUE ¢OINT AVENUE 25.08 TC IONUMEN~ SIGN W X 16 H' CONCRETE RETAINING TW 21.88 WALL CRNR 2.3'N 2.3'E UP 21.53 Eugene G. Kempey Professional Engineer 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Telephone: 631.321.7777 Fax: 631.661.0486 REVISIONS: date description no. 6.13.07 Preliminary Site Plan Submittal 1 7.10.07 Revised Elevations 2 8.13.07 Zoning Board Submittal 3 8.20.07 Full Site Plan Submittal 4 8.23.07 NYSDOT Revised Submittal 5 10.30.07 Revised Submittal: 6 Planning Board Zoning Board NYSDOT LIST OF DRAWINGS: sheet descripUon SP-Zb KEY MAP SiTE PLAN SP-Zbl PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SANITARY CALCULATIONS LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE DETAILS A-1 FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION A-2 LE,FT E,,L, E3IATION RIGHT ELEVATION : ' FEB -4 2008 ., l [ SEAL Project OWNER: WAREX TERMINAk~ CORP. ' P.O. BOX 488 NEWBURGH, NY 12550 PHONE: 845.561.4000 PROJECT: CAR WASH / GAS STATION MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE MATrlTUCK, NY SCTM 1000-142-1-27 drawing no. date 06-13-07 scale AS NOTED SP-Zb drawn by E.R. CONVENIENCE STORE STORAGE SELF CAR WASH TUNNEL GAS STATION 861 SQ.FT. 285 SQ.FT. 907 SQ.FT. 2 EMPLOYEES 4 PUMPS PARKING CALCULATIONS AREA NAME AREA SIzE CODE REQ. REQUIRED PROPOSED 1 SPACE / 200 SQ.FT. 5 SPACES 5 SPACES 1 SPACE / 1000 SQ.FT. 1 SPACES 1 SPACE 10 CARS /BAY 10 CARS 12 CARS 1 SPACE PER EMPLOYEE 2 SPACES 2 SPACES 3 CAR QEUEING PER PUMP 12 CARS 12 CARS 12 SPACES TOTAL INCLUDINO 1 HANDICAPPED CALCULATIONS FOR STORM WATER RUN-OFF RETENTION ~XISTING PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE BUILDING AREA 15,034 SQ.FT. 4,637 SQ.FT. 4,422 SQ.FT. RUN-OFF COEFF. 1.0 .25 1.0 FT. OF RAIN .167 .167 .167 CU.FT. RETENTION REQ'D 2,511 CU.FT. 194 CU.FT. 739 CU.FT. 3,444 CU.FT. PROPOSED AREA RUN-OFF COEFF. FT. OF RAIN CU.FT. RETENTION REQ~) 15,775 SQ.FT. 2,353 SQ.FT. 6,012 SQ.FT. .167 .167 .167 PAVEMENT Lm' I) SCAPE BUILDING 1.0 .25 1.0 2,634 CU.FT. 98 CU.FT. 1,004 CU.FT. 3,736 CU.FT. 3,736 - 3,444 = 292 CU. FT. ADDITIONAL OF STORAGE REQUIRED (2) RING ~ 10'-0" O x 8' DEEP = 1,094.8 CU. FT. OF STORAGE SANITARY WASTE CALCULATIONS: SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OTHER THAN SINGLE FAMII,y RESIDENCES AREA NAME AREA SIZR DESIGN FLOW: DESIGN FLOW: DESIGN FLOW: DESIGN FLOW: SANITARY GREY TOTAL BY SPACE CONVENIENCE STORE 1,266 .03 GPD/SF = 38 GPD .02 GPD/SF = 25 GPD .05 GPD/SF = 63 GPD 63 GPD CAR WASH BAY 969 .04 GPD/SF* = 39 GPD NA .04 GPD/SF* = 39 GPD 39 GPD TOTAL FLOWS: 77 GPD 25 GPD 102 GPD 102 GPD ALLOWABLE DENSITY -- 0.55 ACRES X 600 GPD = 330 GPD PROPOSED SANITARY FLOW OF 77 OPD IS < THE ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM SANITARY FLOW. *DENOTES THAT WATER TO WASH CARS IS EXCLUDED FROM THIS CALCULATION. CAR WASH WAT~:R TO BE FILTERED AND RECYCLED THROUGH AN ON-SITE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMEN~T OF HEALTH APPROVED ZERO DISCHARGE SYSTEM. REQUIRED SEPTIC TANK (2 DAYS) X 198 GALS. = 396 GALS., 1VHNIMUM REQUIRED SEPTIC TANK IS 900 GALS. SUPPLY (1) 8'-0" DIAMETER X 4'-0" LIQUID DEPTH (2) CHAMBER SEPTIC TANK AT 1,264 GALLONS EXISTING LEACHING POOLS TO HAVE A ~ SIDE WALL AREA OF 300 SQ.FT., PROVIDE (1) 8'-0" DIAMETI/R X 12'-0" LIQUID DEPTH LEACHING POOL WITH A SIDE WALL AREA OF 300.6 SQ.FT. EXISTING POOLS SHALL SIT ON A CONCRETE FOOTING RING AND BE SURROUNDED WITH A THREE FOOT CRUSHED GRAVEL / SAND COLLAR~ KEY I BOTANICAL NAME LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE QUERCUS BOREALIS RUBRA COMMON NAME ~DO~ SIZE 4" min. cai,. QUANTITY 6 (~) TSUGA CA~ADENSIS HEMLOCK 30" dim 81 (~) RHODODENDRON PRINOPHYLLUM AZALEA 18"-24' H 17 (~) THUJA OCCIDENTALIS NIGRA AMERICAN ARBOR VITAE 7'H 54 (~) CHRYSANTHEMUM NIPPON MONTAULK DAISY 24" dia. 32 NYSDOT NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL REPLACE ALL SIGNAL INTERCONNECT CABLE, DETECTOR CABLE, CONDUIT AND ALL UNDERGROUND ACCESSORY EQUIPTMENT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK AT THIS LOCATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE NEW YORK STATE DEAPRTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THAT A TONE-OUT OF SIGNAL EQUIPTMENT IS NEEDED. 3. ALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A TRAFFIC RESPONSIVE OPERATION AND ALL INTERCONNECT, WHERE EXISTING, SHALL BE MAINTAINED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY A LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CHARGE OF $500.00 PER CALENDER DAY IF ACTUATION AND COORDINATION IS NOT MAINTAINED. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN EXISTING DRAINAGE BASINS ALONG AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO. ROUTE 25 SITE FRONTAGE AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. REPAIR EXISTING SHOULDER, SIDEWALK AND CURBING AS ORDERED BY THE STATE ENGINEER. TAItLE A C YLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK TYPICAL GRFASE TRAP 3 SP-Zbl TYPICAL LEACHING POOL NTS Eugene G. Kempey Professional Engineer 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Telephone: 631.321.7777 Fax: 631.661.0486 REVISIONS: ~l.~te ~tasorll~tlon ~:13.07 Preliminmy ~lfill ~lah ~ub~ittal 1 ~'.10.07Revised Elevatiena 2 8.13.07 Zoning Board Submittal 3 8.20.07 Full Sit~ Plan Submittal 4 8.23.07 NYSDOT Revised Submittal 5 10.30.07Revised Submittal: 6 Planning Board Zoning Board NYSDOT LIST OF DRAWINGS: sheet description SP-Zb KEY MAP SITE PLAN SP-Zbl PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SANITARY CALCULATIONS LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE DETAILS A-1 FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION A-2 LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION SEAL Project OWNER: WAREX TERMINALS CORP. P.O. BOX 488 NEWBURGH, NY 12550 PHONE: 845.561.4000 PROJE. 7,T: CAR WASH / OAS STATION (~[r' MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE MATFITUCK, NY SCTM 1000-142-1-27 drawing no. date 06-13-07 ^B.OTEO SP-Zbl drown by E.R. 74'-6" RED 36" RADIUS AT ALL CORNERS 4' H[OI-I BATT AND BOARD RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO STEEL BOLLARDS, RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO 2 DIA. STEEL COLUMNS, RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO ~A]_ 1~ FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16''= 1' r TO BE RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO 16" DIA. STEEL COLUMNS, RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO ALL EXTERIOR WALL TO BE SPLIT FACE CONC. MASONRY UNITS. COLOR: WHITE, TYPICAL (LOOKING NORTHEAST) 74'-6" 35'-9" 38'-9" CANOPY, RED STRIPE. iON A WHITE BACKGROUND- ~RYVIT STUCCO~ 36" RADIUS AT ALL CORNERS 4'HIGH BOARD R~B TO MATCH CANOPY AND C1TGOLOGO ALL EXTERIOR WALL TO BE SPLIT FACE CONC. MASONRY UNITS. COLOR: WHITE, TYPICAL 16" DIA. STEEL COLUMNS, RED T( MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16''= 1' (LOOKING SO--ST) STEEL BOLLARDS, RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO Eugene G. Kempey Professional Engineer 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Telephone: 631.321.7777 Fax: 631.661.0486 REVISIONS: date description no. 8.13.07 Preliminary Site Plan Submittal 1 7/10.07 Revised Elevations 2 8.13.07 Zoning Board Submittal 3 8.20.07 Full Site Plan Submittal 4 8.23.07 NYSDOT Revised Submittal 5 10.30.07 Revised Submittal: 6 Planning Board Zoning Board NYSDOT LIST OF DRAWINGS: sheet descdptlon SP~Zb KEY MAP SITE PLAN SP-Zbl PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SANITARY CALCULATIONS LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE DETAILS A-1 FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION A-2 LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION SEAL Project OWNER: WAREX TERMINALS CORP. '" P.O. BOX 488 NEWBURGH, NY 12550 PHONE: 845.561.4000 PROJECT: CAR WASH / GAIIi STATION MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY SCTM 1000-142-1-27 drawing no. dat9 06-13-07 ~i~ '~ scale AS NOTED.~ [ 1 drawn by E.R. 3f 49'-1" 75'-2" 34'- 1" 15'-1" .. BOARD RED TO MATCH CANOPY BUILDING CANOPY AND CANOPY ABOVE GAS PUMP AREA. DO NOT MECHANICALLY ATTACH BOTH ~~.~__d.---~, )]- STEEL BOLLARDS, RED TO , MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO 8'-0" ~'-~ ~ 8,.0,, x m,, L_ ALL' ×TmO" WALL %-I6" m. Sm L OOL , S, TO / DOORS FOR CAR WASH- SPLIT FACE CONC. MASONRY MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO RED TO MATCH STOREFRONT 59'- 10" UNITS. COLOR: WHITE, TYPICAL 67'-2" 127'-0" A3_2~ SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16''= 1' (LOOKING SOUTttEAST) 75'-2" COMPANY L~Di CANOPY ~ON A WHITE BACKGROUND 49'-1" 15'-1" 34'-1" /DRYVIT STUCCO 7 SIDE ~I,EVATION SCALE: 3/16''= 1' STEEL BOLLARDS, RED TO - MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO ~-16" DIA, STEEL COLLrlvlNS, RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO 67'-2" INSERT RUBBER GASKET BETWEEN BUILDING CANOPY AND CANOPY ABOVE GAS PUMP AREA. DO NOT MECHANICALLY ATTACH BOTH CANOPIES 127'-0" BOARD RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO ALI, EXTERIOR WALL TO BE SPLIT FACE CONC. MASONRY UNITS. COLOR: WHITE, TYPICAL 10'-0" WIDE X 8'-0" HIGH OVER}lEAD DOORS FOR CAR WASH- RED TO MATClt STOREFRONT 59'-10" 36" RADIUS AT AIsL CORNERS (LOOKING NOR~rlWEST} Eugene G. Kempey Professional Engineer 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Telephone: 631.321.7777 Fax: 631.661.0486 REVISIONS: date 6.13.07 7.10.07 8.13.07 8.20.07 description Preliminary Site Plan Submittal Revised Elevations Zoning Board Submittal Full Site Plan Submittal 8.23.07 NYSDOT Revised Submittal 10.30.07 Revised Submittal: Planning Board Zoning Board NYSDOT LIST OF DRAWINGS: sheet description SP-Zb KEY MAP SITE PLAN SP-Zbl PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SANITARY CALCULATIONS LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE DETAILS A-I FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION A-2 LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION SEAL Project OWNER: WAREX TERMINALS CORP. P.O. BOX 488 NEWBURGH, NY 12550 PHONE: 845.681.4000 PROJECT:CARWASH/GAS STATION MAIN RD.&FACTORY AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY SCTM 1000-142~1-27 drawing no. date 06-13107 IA scale AS NOTED~=~ 1 drawn by E.R. DRO ACC 2, AC ' GALl 0 SEN: o PROPOSED AMD cn OFFICE ~ PROPOSED PROPOSED ' ;o B. ,n STORAGE CONVENIENCE AREA STORE~ ~ PROPOSED BATHROOM ~, YEL[ -PAY MACHINE PROPOSED ~s. w~ ~ 0 r~ ~ ~ PROPOSED CONCR~E BLOCK WALL~ .__- ~ ~ O CAR WASH ~. ~ EL. OF { ~ ~ ~ ~ . _l[ ~ INTERCONNEC~NO PIPE B~EEN T~KS ~E 4"¢ PVO PIPE. III III ~ PANEL ~ ~ ~ ~ 4' X 8' X DEEP CONCRETE SAND 4"e PVC / ~ }~l 1./~.v. EL, ~ 'kl 1.4NV. EL, ~ ,1 1/NV. EL. ~ ',.1 /./ covers Fo, / ~ ~5. W/,{~, ~. ~ /JNV, ~.~ /~.V, . ~ // . ~ ~-- DROP-TEE --F DROP-TEE ~ CROP-TEE I k DROP-TEE ~ L,_,, ,_,, .,J L,-. '-" 'J DETAIL ~IM EL/ ~ 2&SS/ / / \ 10'-O" ~EL~21,63_ ~NV. ~L. ~oT4 / ~ / \ ,,, / / / \ / \ GROUND UP WATER REPELLENT TREATED CELLULOSE BRm COLOR, ENCLOSED IH A WHITE POLYPROPYLENE SOCK ABSORBERS 4" THICK CONCRETE BAFFLE WALL PIGMENT ABS.,ORBER DETAIL '" ScaJe: I" - 1 ~i WAS_H PLAN 1/4" - 1' B'-O' f s'-o" '-6: 8'-o" 'l f ' ,.(.),,,-o., -r .r r2> ,,-o,, o,,, so,o 1 r 'r . I lC.I, SOUD / s THICK SLAB TOP--, SLAB TOP /COVERS TYP. B" THICK '~ / rlNV, EL. ~ 22.18 4"e PVC DROP-TEE - INV, EL. ~' 400 GAL.. 2%93 COVERS 'PfP. NOTE: 1. ALL UNITS ARE 4" THICK CONCRETE WALLS MONOLITHIC CONSTRUCTION W/ THICK STEEL REINFORCED CONCRETE COVERS 2. RESJDUE RLTRATION TN, IK PEASTONE GRAVEL TO BE CHANGED AS REQUIRED ,OR EVERY 1,000 CARS. PIGMENTS TO BE CHANGED AS REQUIRED OR EVERY 1,000 GARS. PVC EL. l"¢ PIGMENT ABSORBERS T DROP-TEE 10'-0" B" THICK SLAB TOP- ~_~OSS-SECI-[ON OF WATER RECYCLE SYSTEM Scale: NTS (2) 2'-O" C,I, SOLID 1 COVERS SHUTDOWN ALARM DEEP CLEAN WATER STORAGE - I UNIT ) ALARM BOX CAR WASH ·INV. EL, COPPER PIPE RETURN SUPPLY LINES (INSULATED) B" THICK SLAB f (1) 2'-0" C,I, SOLID COVER HIGH WATER TANK- I UNIT CAR WASH ALARMS: S,J.E. PUMPMASTER ALARMS BY S,J.E, RHOMBUS ngineer 640' stmriso Highway West BabYlon, NY 11704 TelePhone:', 631.321.7777 Fax: : 631.661 0486 da~ :~ des=iptio~ no. 0110,7/08RESUBMI*I'rED TO S.C.D.O.H:- 1 I LIST OF DRAWINGS: ", sheet', 'description SS..1 ' 8 ELF"CAR WAS H pi..ANS NOTES ,,: u ' ' ' 55,2 FLOW DIAGRAM OF WATER 'RECYCLE SYSTEM CROSS~SECTION OF WATER RECYCLE SYSTEM PIGMENT ABSORBER DETAIL Project ~ ' 'oWN~:~:' WARE~r;I'ERMINALS CORP. P.O. BOX 488 N~INBURGH, NY 12550 PHONE: 845.561.4000 PROJECT: CAR WAsH I GAS STATION ' MffiN RDi &,FACTORY AVENUE . MATIITUCK, NY '~&M ~ ' 1000-142-1:27 drawing no. '""SS ' dr~ by , E.R. KEY MAP SCALE AS NOTED STOP CROSSWALK NYT343 26,95 / / / / / / / EL 22.62 LIL13 21.00 TC 24.8 BC 24.33 PROPOSED -CATCHBASINf TC 23.65 X24.70 TC 26.89 X 24,91 (LOT 231 SQ,FT, ~TION FORX 25. RADIUS OO F,~ISTING CURB CUT TO BE / MH EL. ~TING 22.53 STING 27) 10" TREE EL 20.80 GLO" TREE EL 20.67 ]ATCHBASIN GLO" TREE EL 20.15 TC BC 18.7 -ZERO DISCHARGE CAR RECLAIMATION ASPHA WASH WATER TW 21.92 BW 18.77 CONC RETAINING WA LT PARKING WALL TW 21,92 1.0'N BW 18.96 O.7'E 'lNG COIL EL EXISTIN¥,' 2'¢ GR,~-TE EL 24, 6~0 25,19 24~69 ST. XB'D TC BC 24.69 GAS PUMP iSLAND- GONG, WALK 66.1' 4o'-o" pROpOSED CO OLEP. ~FF ELI [pi25.4 , X NIGHT F.466,1, CON( 14'-0" (4) EXISTING GAS PUMP ISLAND' CO)LUCy i( EL 24 6 I (2) EL LINE OF PROPOSED CANOPY ABOVE /~cLIN~ OF EXISTING' ~ANOPY ABOVE 24.941 BOLl ~,RD (TYP) CONCRETE PAD (8) (11)n, .59 -,X EL '1 X' ,g6 EL 24. 51'-Y' BC 24.78 !4.83 EL 24.67 1.6'¢ COVER EL 24,87 1.6'¢ COVER 24.140 25,13 BC 3'¢ EL 24.91 CONC CUFTB GUTTER ,--'f' BC 3' COVER I 3'¢ COVER EL 24.77 I EL 24.67 ,75'¢ COMER I 3'¢ COVER EL 24,37 I EL 24,48 3'¢ COVER EL 24.56 X 26.92 WHITE LINE 0 WHITE LINE TURNING LANE 26.28 DBL YELLOW LINE MAI N '""""""'""-" ROAD '~4~4,96 (s.R. 25.03 1.6'¢ COVER SITE PLAN FOR WAREX TERMINAI.S GAS STATION SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" EL 24.57 TC BC PROPOSED (4) TOG INLET EL, 2' x 2' COVEF 7,-9-~%) EL 23.92 E~ PROPOSED REFUSE %(~' ~,, BC __ ~NCLOS~LiGHT 10' ~ x EL 8' PROPOSED TOG INLET EL. PHONI 22'80~~2'~ x 2' - 2~.3~ ~. L~. \ 2.51 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ X 2,X25 23,41 CRNR TW 21.87 BW 18.66 TW 21,89 BW 18.92 NOTE: TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE THERE ARE NO WATER SUPPLY WELLS WITHIN 200' OF THIS PROPERTY. 4~ 0 25.24 TW 21.8~ '5'¢ COVER EL 24,61 TW 21,8~:: BW 19,72 0 Be ALL SITE INFORMATION IS BASED UPON A SURVEY DATED 02/16/06, JOB NO, 06013, BY: ,VOLLMUTH ~ BPUSH 24.58 24-.58 SIGN 23.59 IONUMEN7 SIGN 'WX16'H CONCRETE RETAINING TW 21,8[ WAL 9® WALL CRNR 2,5'N 2.3'E UP WHIITE LINE DBL YELLOW LINE DB~L YELLOW LINE 21.53 -- 2ZJ~ 6~ Eugene G. Kempey Professional Engineer 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Telephone: 631.321.7777 Fax: 631.661.0486 REVISIONS: date description 8.13.07 Preliminary Site Plan Submittal 7.10.07 Revised Elevations 8.13.07 Zoning Board Submittal 8.20.07 Full Site Plan Submittal 8.23.07 NYSDOT Revised Submittal 10.30.07 Revised Submittal: Planning Board Zoning Board NYSDOT LIST OF DRAWINGS: sheet description SP-Zb KEY MAP SITE PLAN SP-Zbl PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SANITARY CALCULATIONS LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE DETAILS A-1 FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION A-2 LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION ',Fi, t}~3';, ~lOV - 1 2007 Project OWNER: SEAL WAREX TERMiaALS CORP. P.O. BOX 488 NEWBURGH, NY 12550 PHONE: 845.561.4000 I~ROJECT: CAR WASH / GAS STATION MAIN RD. & FACTORY AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY SCTM 1000-142-1-27 date 06-13-07 scale AS NOTED drawn by E.R. drawing no. SP-Zb PARKING / QUEUING CALCULATIONS AREA NAME AREA SIZE CODE REQ. REQUIRED PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE 721 SQ.FT. 1 SPACE / 200 SQ.FT. 4 SPACES 5 SPACES STORAGE 209 SQ.FT. 1SPACE / 1000 SQ.FT. 1 SPACES 1 SPACE SELF CAR WASH TIJNNEL 1,129 SQ.FT. 10 CARS /BAY 10 CARS 13 CARS GAS STATION 2 EMPLOYEES 1SPACE PER EMPLOYEE 2 SPACES 2 SPACES 4 PUMPS 3 CAR QUEUING PER PUMP 12 CARS 12 CARS TOTAL 7 SPACES 12 SPACES INCLUDING 1 HANDICAPPED CALCULATIONS FOR STORM WATER RUN-OFF RETENTION EXISTING AREA RUN-OFF COEFF. FT. OF RAIN CU.FT. RETI~NTION REQ'D PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE BUILDING / CANOPY 15,034 SQ.FT. 4,637 SQ.FT. 4,422 SQ.FT. 1.0 .25 1.0 .167 .167 .167 2,511 CU.FT. 194 CU.FT. 739 CU.FT. 3,4+!, CU,FT. PROPOSED AREA RUN-OFF COEFF. FT. OF RAIN CU.FT. RETENTION REQ'D 1.0 .25 1.0 PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE BUILDING / CANOPY .167 .167 .167 15,983 SQ.FT. 2,385 SQ.FT. 5,773 SQ.FT. 2,669 CU.FT. 100 CU.FT. 964 CU.FT. 3,733 CU.FT. 3,733 - 3,444 = 289 CU. FT. ADDITIONAL OF STORAGE REQUIRED (3) RING ~ 10'-0" O x 8' DEEP = 1,642.2 CU. FT. OF STORAGE SANITARY WASTE CALCULATIONS: SUFFOLK COUNTg DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OTHER THAN SINGLE FAMII.y RESIDENCES AREA NAME CONVENIENCE STORE CAR WASH BAY TOTAL FLOWS: AREA 721 DESIGN FLOW: SANITARY .03 GPD/SF = 22 GPD DESIGN FLOW: 67 GPD GREY .02 GPD/SF = 14 GPD DESIGN FLOW: TOTAL · 05 GPD/SF = 36 GPD DESIGN FLOW: BY SPACE 36 GPD 1,129 .04 GPD/SF* = 45 GPD NA .04 GPD/SF* = 45 GPD 45 GPD 14 GPD 81 GPD 81 GPD ALLOWABLE DENSITY = 0.55 ACRES X 600 GPD = 330 GPD PROPOSED SANITARY FLOW OF 67 GPD IS < ~ ALLOWABLE MAXIMUM sAI';flTARY FLOW. *DENOTES THAT WATER TO WASH CARS IS EXCLUDED FROM THIS CALCULATION. CAR WASH WATER TO BE FILTERED AND RECYCLED TI-~OUGH AN ON-SITE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVED ZERO DISCHARGE SYSTEM. REQUIRED SEPTIC TANK (2 DAYS) X 198 GALS. = 396 GALS., MINIMUM REQUIRED SEPTIC TANK IS 900 GALS. SUPPLY (1) 8~-0" DIAMETER X 4~-0" LIQUID DEPTH (2) CHAMBER SEPTIC TANK AT 1,264 GALLONS EXISTING LEACHING POOLS TO HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE WALL AREA OF 300 SQ.FT., PROVIDE (1) 8'-0" DIAMETI~R X 12'-0" LIQUID DEPTH LEACHING POOL WITH A SIDE WALL AREA OF 300.6 SQ.FT. EXISTING POOLS SHALL SIT ON A CONCRETE FOOTLrqG RRqO AND BE SURROUNDED WITH A THREE FOOT CRUSHED GRAVEL / SAND COLLAR. KEY I BOTANICAL NAME LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE QUERCUS BOREALIS RUBRA TSUOA CANADENSIS RHODODENDRON PRINOPHYLLUM THUJA OCCIDENTALIS NIGRA CHRYSANTHEMUM NIPPON COMMON NAME ~DO~ HEMLOCK AZALEA AMERICAN ARBOR VITAE MONTAULK DAISY SIZE 4" min. cai... 30" dia. 15"44' H 7'H QUANTITY 6 81 17 54 32 NYSDOT NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND SHALL REPLACE ALL SIGNAL INTERCONNECT CA~BLE, DETECTOR CABLE, CONDUIT AND ALL UNDERGROUND ACCESSORY EQUIPTMENT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK AT THIS LOCATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE NEW YORK STATE DEAPRTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION THAT A TONE-OUT OF SIGNAL EQUIPTMENT IS NEEDED. 3. ALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A TRAFFIC RESPONSIVE OPERATION AND ALL INTERCONNECT, WHERE EXISTING, SHALL BE MAINTAINED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY A LIQUIDA.TED DAMAGES CHARGE OF $500.00 PER CALENDER DAY IF ACTUATION AND COORDINATION IS NOT MAINTAINED. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN EXISTING DRAINAGE BASINS ALONG AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO ROUTE 25 SITE FRONTAGE AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. REPAIR EXISTING SHOULDER, SIDEWALK AND CURBING AS ORDERED BY THE STATE ENGINEER. TABLEA 12' C,YLINDRICAI. SEPTIC TANK TYPICAL LEACHING POOL NTS // TYPICAI, GREASE TRAP TYPICAL DRYWELL NTS Eugene G. Ke.mpey Professional Engineer 640 Sunrise Highway West Babylon, NY 11704 Telephone: 631.321.7777 Fax: 631.661.0486 REVISIONS: date description 6.13.07 Preliminary Site Plan Submittal 7.10.07 Revised Elevations 8.13.07 Zoning BoaM Submittal 8.20.07 Full Site Plan Submittal 8.23.07 NYSDOT Revised Submittal 10.30.07Revised Submittal: Planning Board Zoning Board NYSDOT LIST OF DRAWINGS: sheet description SP-Zb KEY MAP SITE PLAN SP-Zbl PARKING CALCULATIONS DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SANITARY CALCULATIONS LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE DETAILS A-I FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION A-2 LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION SEAL Project OWNER: WAREX TERMINALS CORP. P.O. BOX 488 NEWBURGH, NY 12550 PHONE: 845.561.4000 PROJECT:CARWASH/GASSTATION MAIN RD.&FACTORY AVENUE MATHTUCK, NY SCTM 1000-142-1-27 date 06-13-07 scale AS NOTED drawn by E.R. drawing no. SP-Zbl Eugene G Kempey ~ 640 S~ise ~way '~' ~ West Babylon,631.321.7777~ 11704 F~: 631.661.0486 ~ date daa~i~tJon no. ~ 8.20.07 Full Oito ~lan 8ubmi~al 4 ~ &2~.07 NYSDOT Ra~aafl gubmi~l FRONT ELEVA~ON ([oom~ ~o~s~ ~ mt o~ o~w, ms: 8P-Zb ~ MAP 81TE P~N 8P-Zbl PARinG GALCU~TION8 D~INAGE CALCU~TION8 SANITARY CALCU~TION8 ~NDSCAPE SCHEDULE DETAILS A-I FRONT ELEVATION R~R ELEVATION A-2 LE~' EL~ATION RIGHT EL~ATION ~ I S~L PROJECT: G~ WASH / ~ STATION ~~ ELEVATION ~ooma so~sn m,~ ~o. ~ ~acro~v AVENUE SCTM ~00~1424-27 drawing no. smle AS NOTED drown by E.R. -~ ~ _~c~.~ Professional Engineer ~ ~ - West Babylon, ~ 11704 ,~,~ /~ ~ '~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Telephone: 631.321.7777 '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? Fax: 631.661.0486 ~~ -- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8.13.07 ZoningBoa~Submi~l 3 ~ 8.20.07 Full Si~ Plan Submi~l 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8,23,07 NYSDOT Revi~d Submi~l 5 ~ ~ 10.30.07 Revised Submi~al: 6 ' 18'-7" NYSDOT ~SIDE ELEVATION ~oomo so~s~ ~';~,. SCALE: 3/16" = I'LIST OF D~"OS: sheet deacription SP-Zb KEY MAP SITE P~N SP-Zbl PARING CALCU~TIONS D~INAGE CALCU~TIONS SANITARY CALCU~TIONS ~NDS~PE SCHEDULE DETAILS A-1 FRONT EL~ATION R~R EL~ATION A-2 LE~ EL~ATION RIGHT EL~ATION _ S~L ~ ' ¢ Pmje~ ~a,~u~ ~[~ PROJECT: CAR WASH / ~S STATION AVENUE SCTM 1000-142-1-27 drawing no. drown by E.R. Eugene G. Kempey NOTES: 1, TEBT OE GYSTEM FOR WATER T,GHTNESS TO PERFORMED *EPORE UBE.^ Professional Engineer / ~ DROP IN LEVEL OF MORE THAN ~I' IN EIGHT HOURS WILL NOT BE ~ ~ -- ' ...... ~ -- - PROPOSED ' 'Ii ~ , ....... ~ PROPOSED PROPOSED , PROPOSE~ ~? ~ ' ~,_. II 7 STORAGE ~ . ~ AREA PROPOSED II BATHROOM ~ X~_'L, 5 ~ PROPOSED COOLER ~ ~ .~ / / / ~ ,, ~~ , / ~'-o" _ ~ 0 - / / / / / / =~ // - , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~! X~ .I SUPPLY LINES~,~, A~RM PANEL ACCEPTABLE, 2. A CLEAN WATER STORAGE TANK INSTALLED WILL HOLD APPROXIMATELY GALLONS OF RECYCLED WATER. THE TANK SHALL HAVE A S.C,D.R,S, APPROVED OVERFILL ALARM THAT IS RIGIDLY MOUNTED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE OVERFILL WARNING AT A LEVEL CORRESPONDING TO 90% CAPACITY AND MUST LOCK OUT THE WASH EQUIPTMENT AT 95g CAPACITY UNTIL THE ALARM IS SATISFIED. THE SENSOR MUST DE OON,ECTED TO AN ALARM PANEL TMAT ,s EOU,PPEO WITH 640 Sumisem~_~_ ~y--''-'-W-- AUDIBLE AND VISUAL WARNING DEVICES. THE PANEL MUST BE IN A READILY VISIBLE LOCATION. ~ West Babylon, NY 11704 ,. PAY MAC.,RE T 1 phone': 631 7777 ~, c^* wA*. ALARM Box e e .321. 3. UNDERCAR SOLENOID RI & FP W/ RUST INH~BITOR LINE #022 4. T,RE W^SN F~: 631.661.0486 5. SOFT GLOSS XS CONTROL PANEL 6. FROST PROTECT & SOLVENT ACC. LINE /~033 ,,., , ~ ,, 7. BIODEORABEABLE PRODUCT PUMPS B. CLEAR COAT REVISIONS: 9. WAX LUSTER 10. HIGH FOAM 11." 12, BLUE FOAM DETERGENT date description ne. 13, YELLOW FOAM DETERGENT 14. RED FOAM DETERGENT 15. PRE-WASH BOOST PUMP 16. PANEL FOR O.H. THRUST PRO DRYER 17. PNUEMATIC ASSY 10 H.D. 18. WASH PUMP 19. BOOST PUMP 20. SEPARATION & FILTRATION SYSTEM 21. 2" ¢ WATER SUPPLY W/ R.P.Z. 22. STOP AND GO SIGNAL BOX LIST OF DRAWINGS: sheet description $$-1 ZERO DISCHARGE SYSTEM PHYSICAL APPERANCE OF PRIDMENT ABSORBERS GROUND UP W~ER REPELLENT TREATED CELLULOSE BROWN IN COLOR. ENCLOSED IN A WHITE POLYPROPYLENE SOCK. [-qllF~ [] iNTERCONNECTING PiPE BETWEEN TANKS ARE 4"¢ PVG PIPE. / -' '. % ~'~ ~.~/~.~ Il ~ .- -- -~ ,~ ~. -/ COUNTER AREA / % PIGMENT v-." ~ " ~"' ' " ~ 4.v. s~. " / / -~-. ". ' .{NV, EL. ~ //INV. EL. ~ / 21,84 k / '.. , /hiM gL~ m ~[M F~ ~M g~ I[ / / INV. EL. 21.B4 ............... J~: [~' ~]'~ ............. ?~IM EL~ i - 4" THICK TOP ~P. ' %' ' %: k24.Gq/ ~[ ~.~) ):% :t k 24.23/ I ~ / / / ............. t~VT-¢[.~5:~7-1~ ~ 22.95/ t 4 CONCR~E (2) 2'¢ O.I. / k ~ k 25.1~/ INV " ~ . . / BAFFLE WALL COVERS FOR / '~ ~ "'//¢ ' k ~ " ~ M EL'~ / , 2~.~o ~ t' 2~,s7~ '... - ~ ./' " ... ~ ', ::.,L '-..._.:z,.., . " " '._ _..-' .~ ..-. . ~,,~ ~ PVC LJ / PVC '~--. - ..... ~ '-'(, ,, DRO: : ~ '-%-- DROP-TEE I ~DROP-TEE -~ ~ ~.O.-T~: ...... - P~G~ENT ABSOBBER D~L SELF ~R W~H P~N .,_o. .,_o. 'I .,_o,, "-I .,_o., ¢'-t .,_o. .,_o. .,_o,, , ,' ~ ' ' ' (2) 2'-0" C.I. SOLID [1) 2'-0" C.I. SOLID ~L F(2) 2'-0"¢ (2) 2'-0" c L SOLID 8" THICK COVERS SYSTEM 8" THICK COVER THICK C.L SOUD COVERS ~P, 4"¢ PVC TOP~ I f~j?WN S~B TOP% [ Pmje~ S~B TOP~ -iNV. EL S~B TOP~ ~ DROP-TEE IDROP--TEE DROP-TEE DROP-TEE V~ ~A~RM : ,__ . , ~ , ', ~ .:: ~'~ '~ TO A~M BOX -~ ~ IN CAR WASH P.O. BOX 488 °'"v' ~' ~ 2 ~ ~ %iv. s~. 2~,~0~ r. ' ~A¢~, ='.~7 2 ~ ' 2'.84 ,; I~.~5) HlO" 2~,6S iNV, EL, ~ NEWBURGH, NY12550 WATER ~ATEB :, C~ WASH A~RMS: S.J.E. PUMPMASTER PHONE: ~5.~1.4000 ~ 400 GAL. 21,93 ,' r~ ;'7 r~f~ t ~ ~ ~ t ,' A~RM ~ ; A~RBS BY S.J.E, RHOMBUS ,. '~ ~ '"~: ..... ': .... ~ '; GRAVEL ~ m I / ,, ' &~ [ [ /m /b~~m~PIPE RmURN .I SUPPLY LINES I PROJEOT: OAR WASH / ~8 STATION o LOW ~ ~ MAIN RD, &FAOTORY SAND SEDIMENT PIT - UNiT ~ ~GRAVEL¢~ I [ 500 GAL ': ~ ~GRAVEL[~ [ ~ ,500 OAL, 1,500 GAL . _ 1,500 GAL ,; ; AVENUE :, ~ -, BAS~, - ' ' ~ ~ BAS~, - - ~ ..... L A~RM ~~NT L 4"¢ PIGMENT '4"¢ PIGMENT [4"¢ PIGMENT i THICK STEEL REINFORCED CONCR~E COVERS BEEP CLEAN WATER STORAGE - 1 UNIT 1~'-~"¢ ~ m'-O" OV~nOW 8OTM 1000-142-1-27 2. RESIDUE FILTRATION TANK P~STONE GRAVEL TO BE TAb~K - 1 UNIT ,.oo~ EA,~. ~ CROSS-SCiON OF WATER RE~CLE SYNCH ~l. AS ~OTE~~ ~ -- .. drawn by E.R. 10" BUSH EL 22.62 No Entry 24.70 -Iko Entry 24.91 (3) 25.78 LI L13 M / ~)EL C( EL~22.53 GRATE ~EL 23,77 10" TREE ~EL 20,80 WHITE LiNE 10" TREE EL 20.67 MONITORING WELL X 24.67 25.16 -- X 24.41 35'-8" q48%7'3( 24.1~_z -¥EL 24,66 · ST. I 6' DIA. Xl 6' D. I 1.69 I TC BC DISCHA 10" TREE EL 20.15 H.C. UTILITY & ~',~ STORAGE H. S -- OFFICE 5.32 25,24 IBC 24.7O EXISTING I OAS PUMPI GASKET BETWEEN EL CO UMN EL ?_4.98 I '/ 2'¢ GTATE 20'-0" TYP, (4) (5) DECO1L. STREET 24,82 24,88 x25.85 ,48 ~ 6" BUSH COLUMN 1""'~ EL 24.96 I" E1 24,96 X' 6' HIGH ENCL. FOR SOAP BARRELS TW 21.92 BW 18.77 CONC 40' rear of shed on property line SOAP STORAGE RETAINING 62' NEW CONCRETE BLOCK CAR WASH TUNNEL ~'/ \ / \(r2~ / \ fL 66.1' EXISTING ONE STORY BRICK BUILDING (5) (OAS STATION, CONV. STORE FF EL 25,41 66,1' HC RAMP I Ii~--~eEW OVERHEAD ~ CANOPY MATCH X 17,75 X 17.41 /ALL TW 21.92 BW 18.96 49%3" 14-6.00' WALL CRNR 1.0'N 0.7'E TC 25.24 BC 24.74 (4) 25.24~CAR WASH 24.74 L-OUT ,BC (9) 25.11 }AY STATI( 3'¢ COVEI .75'¢ EL 24.7' EL COVER 24.91( 12'-1" 24.99 24.50 EXIST. ~'~ 3'¢ CO/ ISLAND'~ I DO 24.73( (1) (4) ~WATER ·. CONCRETE 24.56 NOT CONNECT C~ (2) ~OPIES% I qOPIES~ I 1.6'¢ COVER , 5'¢ EL 24. ....... ~--¢t(EL 24'83 X EL 24.87 i EL 24,( 24,94Q II 24.75 /I (5) -~"-~-~'~ ' 3'¢ COVER 1 6'¢ COVER · . EL 24 67 r ~ '/~X COVER ' %. ~ ~ / ~L 24.56 ~~OVERHEAD 2~'40 I CA ' ' BOLLARD (~Ym) I ~ ~ ~ / TC 25.24-~ (5) CONCRETE EXISTING GAS PUMP PAE (8) (6) EL, 23.4 X 16.92 N N N \ ,~TW 21.87 \ BW 18.66 X 16.80 ~ .... 12'W X 8'D CONC. BLK. REFUSE ENCLOSURE SEE DETAIL TW 21.89 BW 18.92 ~- ~ X 18.25 LO C) Z © rD TW 21.87 BW 19.57 X t7.7: ALL SITE INFORMATION IS BASED UPON A SURVEY DATED 02/16/06, JOB NO, 06015, BY: VOLLMUTH ~ B~USH J d '5'¢ COVER EL 24.61 MOVE EXIST. VENT PIFIES AREA: 24,140.48 sq ff 0.55 ACRE DATUM: NGVD 29 TW 21.86 19.72 (11) 24,96 (6) CONC SLUICE ~ 0 BUSH EL ¢.52 DECOR. STREET CONC C;URB GUTTER WHFTE LiNE MAiN (WIDTH VARIES) UP344 ): .59 % j% BC 24.50 Z: · I 10' ¢ ~ TC 20.022 EL 24.51 No (7) 24,00, (8) 24.04 TOG // \ EL 22. INLET ~ / 22,80 ~ ~&, ¢ 23,04~ %8' D ."~' CONC SLUICEWAY 24.Ol 198.00' CONCRETE RETAINING WALL TW 21,86 ~ TW 20.19 BW 20,08 '~ BW 19,70 8" TREE WALL CRNR 6" BUS½~ 22.51 2.S'N EL 24.52 EL 22.50 E 2,5'E BUSH ~H EL 22.64 ~ 010'' BUSH 24,20 EL APRON EL 22,81 SIGN NTT344 6" BUSH EL 23.43 6" BUSH GW ~1.44 22,7 :L 22.50 21.44 ~ TELE20,58 COV ROAD TC 22.57 TC 21 .94 UP 22.09 APRON 21 .51 .14 (~) 22.64-x~ ~HiTE LINE 21.29 (S.R. 25) TC 20,84 ~20,57 BC 20.43 ION, CONVENIENCE STORE, CAR WASH ,TC 21.( 20.82 JONAT] HUTTIC ARCHI'~ 640 SUE_ W BAlq T631 3 F631 6; ISSUEE MAY. NOV. RRVIS] 06-28-0 SCTM¢~ S LANDSCAPE SCHi~;D GLE JONATHAN rm¥ BOTAmCA~rAU~ COM~ONNA~m SI~ QU~'n'r~ L~SC~G NOTES: ~ ~m~s ~o~s ~ ~, o~ 4"~, ~.. * 1. CO~R ~L PL~G BEDS WITH A ~ OF 2" T~C~SS OF ~WOOD ~CH. ~TTICK ~ zsuoAc~sxs ~OCZ ~0" & ~4 2. AT PL~T~G BEDS ~ P~(~G ~AS ~ AT ~AS OF ~Q~D T~FIC VIS~IT~SE LOW PROF~E PL~T~GS. ~C~CT ~ ~ODODE~RONP~OP~m ~ 18"-24'H 117 3. D~G LOC~ GROW~G SEASON, O~R S~L P~C~SE ~ PL~ ~ FLOWE~G PLUS AS ~Q~D ~ PL~G BEDS TO ~ ~o~mo~ ~c~o~v~ 7'. ~2 CLOSE G~S ~ PL~T~G ~AS ~ TO ~D COLOR ~ V~ETY TO L~SC~G. 640 S~SE ~GH~ ~ c~vs~ms uouxAmzv~v 24" m 2~ 4. PRO~E ~W ~-GRO~ ~GATION SYSTEM AT ~L ~AS OF L~SC~G AS ~Q~D BY CODE. W BAgmeN ~ 1 1704 , 5. PRO~E DECO~T~ BENC~S ON ~SO~Y PA~NG ~AS WITH ~SH ~CEPTACLES ~ DECO~TI~ LIGHT~G ~ONG ST~ET sc~'s: 100o-142-01-27 FRONTAGE OF PROPERTY. ST~Et~O~SS: 9945~O~,mrn'rOC~O~OFSOmO~O,~ 6. PRO~EDECO~TI~WATERFEAT~ATFRONTL~SC~G~A. T631 321 7777 F 631 661 0486 ZOla DISTraCT: B-OE~ BUS,SS TOT~ ~A OF S~CT LOT: 24,140 SQ. ~. (0.55 AC~S) TOT~A~Q~DFOR~A~OMOBmELA~RY40,000 SQ. ~. (0.918AC~S) 7. Street trees. Street trees with a minimum c~liper of four inches shall be planted and/or maintained adjacent to all road frontaoes in accordan~ with lown TOT~A~DUCTIONV~CE~Q~STED: 15,860 SQ. ~. (0.36AC~S) standards in an amount equal to 30 feet on center. [~mended 2-~0-2004, effagtiva 3-~-2004] F~O~D: 4,482 SQ. ~ (.200) F~PROPOS~: 3,280 SQ. ~. (0.135) TOT~LOTCO~CL~mGC~OP~P~OPOSED: .286 (6,924 SQ. FT.) 8. Parkin0 area screenino. All parkin9 areas shah be screened from view with a hedoe, berm and/or decorative wall or fence in accordan~ with Town standards. ISSUED FOR FIL~G: B~G ~A ~O~D - CO~NCE STO~ ~ GAS STATION, C~ WASH: 7,742 SQ. ~. a~Om6~APgOPOSE~-CO~NCESTO~aAS STAnOm~C~WASa: 3,2a0SQ.~. ~. Decorative off-street parkin9 lot liohts shall be uniformly applied, installed and maintained. ~Y. 30.2006 DOB a~vma ~A mC~AS~ Vm~C~ ~QmSTe~-CO~CE STO~ ~ aAS STAnO~, C~ WAS~: 0 SQ. FT. ~.nmO~A a~,LO~D-C~WAS~ CO~NCE STO~ ~ O~ STATrON: 7,742 SQ.~. ~ 0. Off-street parkino lot li9ht fixtures shall be nonadjustable horizontally mounted fixtures with less than ninety-degree luminaire cutoff. Fixtures that project light NOV. 22.2005 DOB B~.D~G ~A pROPOSED - C~ WAS~ CO~NCE STO~ ~ G~ STATIOn: 3,280 SQ. ~. TOT~ ~ OF CO~mSCE STO~ ~Tm S~E ~ ~SPL~Y ~LO~D: N/A SO. FT. or 01are toward the street right-of-way or adjoinino properties shall not be permitted. TOT~ ~A OF CO~NCE STO~ ~T~ S~E ~ DISPLAY PROPOSED: 833 SQ. ~. ~SED: TOT~ ~AmC~AS~V~mC~ FO~ CO~NC~ STO~ ~T~ S~E ~mS~[AV~Q~S~D: ~/A ~ ~. Pedestrian liohtino shall be uniformly applied, installed and maintained along pedestrian walkways and alle~ays.06-28-06 E.R. PA~D ~A PROPOSED: 14,411 SQ. ~. L~SC~. ~A~q~: S,4S9 SO. ~T. OS.0%) ~ 2. Building-mounted lioht fixtures shall be for safety or si0nage purposes only and must direct lioht downward. ~all-pack iiohts or other liohtino that shines L~SC~ED ~APROPOSED: 2,772 SQ. ~. (11.5%) outward toward adjoinino propeRies or the street right-of-way shall be prohibited. 8hieldino shall be provided to avoid lioht trespass and 91are. L~SC~ED FRO~ Y~ ~Q~D: 25'-0" S~ L~SC~ED ~O~ Y~ PROPOSED: 1,71g SQ. ~. L~SC~ED ~O~ Y~ ~DUC~ON V~CE ~Q~STED: 7,015 SF. ~. ~3. Decorative streetliohts of not more than ~2 feet in heioht shall be uniformly applied, installed and maintained situated in sidewalk cutouts eve~ 30 feet on PERCE~ OF L~SC~E PROPOS~ TO BE ~ ~O~ Y~ 7.1% (1,718 SQ. FT.) PERCE~ OFL~SC~E~Q~DTOBEmmO~Y~DUC~ONV~CE~Q~STED: center along the site's frontage. The same lighting fixture shall be applied to each Main Street Business District. ~O~ Y~ SE~ACK PROPOSe: 13.4' ~O~ Y~ SETBACK ~DUC~ON V~CE ~Q~STED: 26.6' ~Y~ SE~ACK~Q~D: 50'-0" ~ y~ SE~ACK PROPOSe: 0'.0" BU~ER PROPOSED: NO~ , L~SC~E 4,637 SQ.FT. .08 .,67 62 ~.FT. L~SC~E 2,772 SQ.FT. .08 .167 37 CH.FT. (1) ~G ~ 10'-0" O x 8' DEEP = 547.4 ~. FT. OF STOOGE CO~NIENCE STO~ 1,992 SQ. FT. .03 ~sf = 60 gpd .02 gp~sf= 40 ~d .05 ~sf = 100 ~d 100 ~d C~ WASH BAY 1,288 SQ. FT. .04 ~s~= 52 ~d NA .04 ~s~= 52 gpd 52 gpd TOT~ FLOWS: 112 ~d 40 gpd 152 ~d 152 ~d ~owable Densi~ ~ 0.55 acres x 600 ~d = 330 ~d, SCTM~ 1 000-1 42-0 1-27 Proposed s~t~ flow of 112 ~d is 218 ~d below ~e ~owable m~im~ s~t~ flow of 330 ~d for ~s prope~ as a~owed by law. · *Denotes ~at water to wa~ c~s is excluded ~om ~s c~c~afion · C~ wash water to be ~tered ~d recycled ~ou~ ~ on-site S~o~ Co~W Depment of He~ Approved Zero Disch~ge system · ~q~ed septic t~ (2 days) x 198 gals. = 396 g~s., minimum req~ed septic t~ is 900 g~s. · Supply (1) 8'-0" &meter x 4'-0" ~q~d dep~ (2) chamber septic t~ at 1,264 g~ons · E~sfing Leae~g pools to ~ve a ~m side w~l ~ea of 300 sq. ff., promde (1) 8 -0 &me e ~q~d d~ leac~g pool ~ a side w~l ~ea of 300.6 sq. ~., ~d a eapaciW of 3,792 g~ons. E~sfing Leae~g pools shah sit on a concrete foo~g r~g ~d be s~o~ded M~ a ~ee foot crashed gravel / s~d coH~ / 200 SQ. FT. OFA (7.80) C~ p~G (12) SPACES, ~CL. (1) ~IC~ CONDUCE STO~ 1,576 SQ. FT. (1) SPACE OFFICE 112 SQ.FT. (1) SPACE / 100 SQ.FT. GFA (1.12) C~ P~G STOOGE 3~ SQ.FT. (1) ~ACE / 1000 8Q.FT. OFA (0.30) C~ P~O 9.22 +2 I GAS STATION 4 P~S (1) ~ACE PER ~LO~E (2) ~LO~ES O) C~ Q~OPERP~ 02) C~ Q~O (~2) C~ Q~O LANDSCAPE SCHI~DCLE KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIg~ QUAN'rrr ¥ (~ QUERCUS BOREALIS RUBRA RED OAK 4" mln Citl.. 7 (~) TSUOA cAIqADENSIS HEMLOCK 30" dia. 14 1~) RHODODENDRON pP. INOPHYLLUM AZALEA 18"-24' H 117 ~~ ~, - -~',,-~ ~ - JONAT~ 6'-0" LONG F~L~ SOL~ ~ - ~ ~-'~ -- - ~-u,t ~ ~TTICK ~l'f~ ~NC~, P~ ~ ~ ~- ;- . PATCH AS ~Q'D (OR', ~,?-- ~US~ TW'C~COSC.-- ~ ~ ~ . 640 S~SE ~GH~ TOP OF ~W S~) ~ , / ST~ET ~P~ CU~ G~TER : 6" x 6". 1o L~,~% W BAB~ON ~ 11704 t SLA~ED F~C DETA~ s~ ~ wia , p~,,,,.o.~. T~ICAL CONC~TE C~~~w ~ " "~=:='"~="/"="~'(~" GUTTER & ST~ET ~P~R '=~ ~~' : T 631 321 7777 - ~L~ ~*~* F 631 661 0486 3~0 P.S,I, CON~ ~ ; ~ ~4~~ ~ ~3," Te~ po~ 1'1~" 0 ~m ~ or 8 I.m' ~.Y.s.~ si~, ~ ~ is subjc~ to ~ ~va of ~e To~ ~ & p~g bo~ ' ~ ~: -- ~ '"~'"- ~ ~=~-~'~ I ' , , ,o,,~ ~,ooo,,~,,~ ~ -- ISSUED FOR FIL~G: ~ ~ , . '- ~Y. 30.2006 DOB .= ~ -~- _, /~ .l'l- ~ NOV. 22.2005 DOB ST~ET ~P~ C~ q ;~ ~'~ '~. ~' '" ...w ~ ...... . ' .,. T~C~I, BOLL~ DET~ ~ ~, aa~s r 06-28-06 E.R. ~Fa~ Fasca ,~ eL~¢ raTa-, TYPIC~ ST~ET CU~S ST~ET ' ~-" '~FUSa ENCLOS~ DETAH. ~PAIR DETML MMOR ~E PL~G BED u~,~..~..~ i"' / M~OR T~E LEAC~G BAS~ DETAH, ON SI~ ' ..... ~'~-"---' LIGHT POLE DET~L ' ~ XL 7/ ~ SCTM~ 1000-142-01-27 __ FI~ sides 1:10 _ , ) Sides of C~b Rmps ~%~mc~ SEP~C T~ ~T~IC~ G=ASE ~ ~X k%~J"Z:~i/4-.=-,~ T~IC~ LEAC~G POOL NTS ~m ~~S 74'-6" Go 36" RADIUS AT ALL CORNERS 4' HIGH BATT AND BOARD RRD TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO STEEL BOLLARDS, RED TO 6" DIA. STEEL COLUMNS, RED TO 16" DIA. STEEL COLUMNS, RED TO .ALL EXTERIOR WALL TO BE MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO STOREFRONT TO BE RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO SPLIT FACE CONC. MASONRY MATCH CANOPYc~I~ CITGO LOGO UNITS. COLOR: WI-Il'Il/, TYPICAL ELEVATION (LOOlOlqo I~0RItmAST) ~_ 1~ SCALE: 3/16" = 1' 74'-6" .[ 3 5'-9" 3 8'-9" = t CANOpIir, RED STRIPE. BACKGROUND 36" RADIUS AT ALL CORNERS 4' HIGH BATr AND BOARD RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO ALL EXTERIOR WALL TO BE SPLIT FACE CONC. MASONRY UNITS. COLOR: WHITE, TYPICAL 16" DIA. STEEL COLUMNS, llg. r MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO STEEL BOLLARDS, RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CH'GO LOGO _1REAR ELEVATION a,oomosoumms~ SCALE: 3/16"= 1' JONATHAN HUTTICK ARCHITECT 640 SUNRISE HIGHWY W BABYLON NY 11704 T 631 321 7777 F 631 661 0486 ISSUED FOR FILING: MAY. 30.2006 DOB NOV. 22.2005 DOB REVISED: 06-28-06 E.R. SCTM# 1000-142-01-27 A-1 . 49'- 1" ... 75'-2" 34'-1" ~ 5'- 1 I .~, JONATHAN ~' ~ ~ '-, ~.~ HUTTICK ~ ARCHITECT [~ 640 SUNRISE HIGHWY 36" RADIUS AT ALL ~-~-~ T 631 321 7777 COmqERS~ ~~]~]~~~' .... ~ ....... \ ~.~ ~--CA~OP¥,REDSTRte~ r--~CO~.DANYLOGO ~o F 631 661 0486 ~-- IY75¥ .... W75 .......... TWI ............ TTIT ......... ~__ ~ ~ ~ ~SSUD rO~ FIL~O: · ,, , la r r ., ~4'mGHBA~ / ~':l --k 30.2006 DOB ~[ [~I ~11 ~111 ; trill ~O~DTO / e~-- ~~~~~~~___~_ mTCHC~OPY / ~ _ NOV. 22.2005DOB ~ B~DmG C~OVY ~ C~OPY ;~ - ~ ~SED: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~OVE GAS P~ ~ DO NOT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~C~C~LY ~CHBO~ :~ Y 06-28-06 E.R. . ~ 11 I I ~ ~ ~ ~ / C~OP~S S~EL BOLL~S, R~n TO ~ ~ I II ~~~ ~ ~ . mTCHC~OPY~CXT~LO~ ri ~ RRD TO ~TCH STO~O~ 59'-10"m~. 4COLOR: ~IE, ~IC~ ~127'-0"~TCH67,_2,,C~OPY ~ CITGO ~OO ~ SIDE ELEVATION ¢ooma so~s~ SC~E: 3/16" = 1' - '~} 75'-2" ~ ~ 49'-1" J' ~ 15'-1" = = 34'-1" ~ ~ co~ LO00 ~ ~ ,~] ~ .................................... ........... _ .............................. ~ SCTM~ 1000-142-01-27 .... .......... .... .... : ....... .... L ~ S~ BO~S, ~D TO [~ C~OPIES ~ ~TGO LO~ ~ X ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~TCH C~OPY ~ CITGO LO~ ;] X ~ ~ ~ [ / / ~TCH C~OPY ~ CIT~ LO~ SPLIT FACE CONC. ~SO~Y DO0~ FOR C~ WASH- 67'-2"roTS. COLOR: ~, ~IC~ ~D TO ~TC]H STO~RO~ - ~ ~ 59'-10" ~ 127'-0" SIDE ELEVATION ¢oomo~o~s~ 3/ 6" = LANDSCAFING NOTES: SIZE QUANTfl Y l. COVER ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH A MINIMUM OF 2" THICKNESS OF HARDWOOD MULCH. 2. AT PLANTING BEDS IN PARKING AREAS AND AT AREAS OF REQUIRED TRAFFIC VISIBILITYLTSE LOW PROFILE PLANTINGS. QUERCUSBOREALISRUBRA 3. DURING LOCAL GROW]NG SEASON, OWNER SHALL PURCHASE AND PLANT ANNUAL FLOWERING PLANTS AS REQUIRED IN PLANTING BEDS TO CLOSE GAPS IN PLANTING AREAS AND TO ADD COLOR AND VARIETY TO LANDSCAPING. 4. PROVIDE NEW IN-GROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT ALL AREAS OF LANDSCAPING AS REQUIRED B Y CODE. ARCHITECT 5. PROVIDE DECORATIVE BENCHES ON MASONRY PAVING AREAS WITH TRASH RECEPTACLES: DECORATIVE LIGHTING ALONG STREET RHODODENDRON pRINOPI-1YLLUM FRONTAGE OF PROPERTY, 6. PROVIDE DECORATIVE WATER mATURE AT FRONT LANDSCAPING AREA. 640 SUNRISE HIGHWY 7. Street trees. Street trees with a minimum celiper of four inches shah be planted and/or maintained adjacent to all roscl frontages in accordance with Town ~.92 ¢ ~a/ 8. Parking area screening. All parking areas shall be screened from view with a hedge, berm and/or decorative wall or fence in accordance with Town standards. ~'d~'4'~/C '~/o 9. Decorative off-street parking lot lights shall be uniformly applied, installed and maintained. F 63 1 661 0486 - ~ 10. Off-street parking lot light fixtures shall be nonadjustable horizontally mounted fixtures with less than ninety-degree luminaire cutoff. Fixtures that project light C~,r' 9!&~,~}.~, ,-~?~ or glare toward the street right-of-way or adjoining properties shall not he permitted. 12. Building-mounted light fixtures shall be for safety or s[gnage pu~oses only and must direct light downward. Wall-pack lights or other lighting that shines ~ ~ outward toward adjoining propedies or the street right-of-way shall be prohibited. Shielding shall be provided to avoid light trespass and glare. ISSUED FOR FIL~G: 30.2006 DOB ' I ., 13. Demrative streeUights of not more than 12 feet in height shall be uniformly applied, installed and maintained situated in sidewalk ~touts eve~ 30 feet on NOV. 22.2005 DOB ~ . center along the site's frontage. The same lighting f~ture shall be applied to each Main Street Business District. RE SED: 05-30-06 E.R. LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QUAN'~]'~¥ (~ QUF~RCUS BOREALIS RUBRA RED OAK 4" min. o~1.. 7 STREET ADDRESS: 9945 MAIN ROAD, MATT£rUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NY ALL SI TE INF'ORMATION IS BASED UPON , ~ SURVEY DATED 02/16/06, JOe NO. 06013, ZONINGDISTRICT: B-GENERALBUSIIqESS ---~'*'~ ~ // ~7//-~Y x,,.m ,,~,~ × ,I.'OZZMUTH TOTAL AREA OF SUBJECT LOT: 24,140SQ. FT, (0.55 ACRES) ~ /~ ~* ~// / ~ r~_~ TOTALAREAREQUIR~DFORANAT3TOMOBII~LAUNDRY40,000SQ. FT.(0.91gACRES) I,F, GEND 7 f' f~ / i TOTAL AREA REDUCTION VARIANCE REQUESTED: 15,860SQ. Fr. (0,36 ACRES) ...... ~ // /// / I l~ FAR ALLOWED: 4,482 SQ. FI' (.200) -- ~ Emol, FAR PROPOSED: 3,280 SQ. FT. (0.135) , = MANTIOLE /f f/ g///./ ~OTAL~OTCOWr. AO~(INCU:DINGCANOP¥)PROPOSED: .286 (6,924SQ. FT.) ~b.~f' ~o ~o~ =~O~O~^VEM~rr /~' .// #/// 7' BUILDING AREA ALLOWED - CONVENIENCE STORE AND OAS STATION, CAR WASH: 7,742 SQ. FT, L'.P.' ' = LEACI-I~O POOL /~ /f //.g/ . I ×,~ ,, BU[LDINGAREAINCREASEVARIANCEREQUESTED-CONVENIENCESTOREANDGASSTATION, CARWASH: 0SQ. FT. B.C. = BOTTOM OF CURB i /. /f f/ti~/ 1775 ){17.41 ×l.,ti TOTALydlEAOFCONVE~CESTORI3RET~dLS^I,EANDDISPLAYPROPOSED: 8~3SQ. FT. ," , ~ , ~ ' , o I 48 57 3 E . -- . PAVED AREA PROPOSED: 14,444 SQ. FT. B::::~ ' DILMlqAOE FLOW /'~ ~~ ~ ~ ~--~w ~\ LANDSCAPED FRONT YARD PROPOSED: 1,718SQ, FT, / . // //t{~J~'~,~-/~_t.u29%'~ ]EL2+- -~~ ~a~x. 'X v,.///i~l~) LANDSCAPED FRONT YARD REDUCTION VARIANCE REQUESTED: 7,01$SF. FT. / ~~~ ~ ~_ ~, c~aw~s~,~ ~,~:(~)~,w,a,' PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE REQUIRED TO BE IN FRONT YARD 3-3,5 % ' ~.~, - PERCENT OF LANDSCAPE PROPOSED TO BE IN FRONT YARD 7.1% (1,718 SQFT.) / ~g '. ~-~/~};,~ ,mv'~ ~s.,v . ~7~~'~.~e m FRONTYARD SETBACKREQUIRED: 40'-0" ~ _,- ~ e~ . c ,, ¢~ _~ co 'FRONTYARDSETBACKPROPOSED: 13.4' ~ ,~[ss~^~[~u cc~vlsm~ ~ ~ ch. m.t~ REAR YARD SETBACK PROPOSED: 0'-0" ~ ~ '~ Z ' -- ~'~ ~wm ~7 BUFFERPROPOSED: NONE ~.~-~ ~ IS~-A D OASK£T REYWEEN CANOPIES 3'¢ CO LANDSCAPE 4,637 SQ.FT. .08 ·167 62 CU.FT. P" ' -- -- L 2"fi5 /'/~{11~ I ~ TM 21'~ S 4 SANIT~Y W~Tg CALCU~TIONS: SUFFOLK CO~ DgPARTMENT OF HEALTH OTHER T~N SINGLE FA~LY ~SIDgNCES ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6~ ~ 6" EL 22,4 CAR WASH ~Y 1288 SO FT. .~ ~o~s~= 52 ~d NA .04 end/s~= 52 ~nd 52 ~nd ~ UN~ m ~o ~ ~'ed"~t"~w~f~2gpdi'2~8gpdbc~wthea~l~`~c~mumsa~*~°w~f33~gpdf~r~lapr°p~*as`~°~dby~aw.*~m~s ~t water to~shoaraiscxelud~ ~m~se,culation ~ UU m U-// ~// ;, 0..55ACRE , car~ah~r`~l~r`d`~``yd`dtD~ughan~n-~t~Su~kC~unWmpa"m`nt~fH~mAppmv`dZ~Di"h~g~'y"m / / t,ow.,, ~,,~ %,. DATUM. NGVD 29 ~"ANA~ *~A~IZ~ ~~"~ ~"OP~~ rROPO~P~~PROPOSED GAS STATION, CON ENCE STO , CAR WASH _ CON~CESTO~ 1,9~2SQ. FT. (1) SPACE/2008Q, FT, GFA (10) CARP~O (12) SPACES,~CL ('>~ SCAI,E: 1" = 20'-0" C~WASH~Y (l)~Y (lO) ~ Q~O/~Y (lO) c~ Q~O (lO) ~ Q~G (CAR WAS~ OAS STATION 4P~S O) C~ Q~G pER p~ (12) C~ Q~O (12) C~ Q~O (l) SPACE PER ~LO~E (2) E~LO~S )ETAIL · 1-1/2'~ ~ Top rail (typ.) ~FER FENCE AND PLANTING DETAIL PLANTING BED MINOR TREE [LINDRICAT, SEPTIC TANK INDUSTRIAL STREET REPAIR TYPICAL CONC, CURB GUTTER TYPICAL CONCRETE CURB GUTTER & STREET REPAIR INDUSTRIAL STANDARD STREET REPAIR. CURB TYPICAL STREET CURBS STREET REPAIR DETAIL post SP~ LEACHING BASIN DETAIl. ON SITE T~YPICAI, GREASE TRAP (~ {I2 REFUSE ENCLOSURE DETAIl, LIGHT POLE DETAIl. ~ICAL LEACHING POOL JONATHAN HUTTICK ARCHITECT 640 SUNRISE HIGHWY W BABYLON NY 11704 T 631 321 7777 F 631 661 0486 ISSUED FOR FILING: MAY. 30.2006 DOB NOV. 22.2005 DOB REVISED: 05-30-06 E.R. SCTM# 1000-142-01-27 SP-2 74'-6" STEEL BOLLARDS, ,, ,, MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO 36" RADIUS AT Al CORNERS 4' HIGH BArT AND BOARD R~ TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO STOREFKONT TO BE RED TO - MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO 3 BE SPLIT FACE CONC. MASONRY UNITS. COLOR: WHITE, TYPICAL 41_~ FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16''= 1' (LOOKING NORTHEAST) 74'-6" 36" RADIUS AT ALL CORNERS BOARD RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO CANOPY, RED STRIPE- A WHITE BACKGROUND ALL EXTERIOR WALL TO BE SPLIT FACE CONC. MASONRY UNITS. COLOR: WHITE, TYPICAL t~~/REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16"= 1' (LOOKING SO--ST) 16" DIA. STEEL COLUMNS, RRB TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO STEEL BOLLARDS, RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO JONATHAN HUTTICK ARCHITECT 640 SUNRISE HIGHWY W BABYLON NY 11704 T 631 321 7777 F 631 661 0486 ISSUED FOR FILING: MAY. 30.2006 DOB NOV. 22.2005 DOB REVISED: 05-30-06 E.R. SCTM# 1000-142-01-27 A-1 49'-1" 34'-1" 15'-1" 75'-2" 36" RADIUS AT ALL ~ DRYVIT STUCCO CITGO ,.___-~COMPANY LOGO ON A w~RE~DBIcKTR]~GERouND-~-~ ~ ~ -ClTGO BOARD RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO -- INSERT RUBBER GASKET BETWEEN BUILDING CANOPY AND CANOPY ABOVE GAS PUMP AREA. DO NOT IVIECHANICAI.I.Y ATrACH BOTH CANOPIES STEEL BOLLARDS, RED TO MATCH --- 8"0" X 8'-0" OVERHEAD ALL EXTERIOR WALL TO BE - 16" DIA. STEEL COLUMNS, RED TO ~ DOORS FOR CAB. WASH- SPLIT rACE CONC. MASONRY MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO ~ED TO ~nTC~ sToa~om' 59'-10" ~ COLOm VCmTE, TVPlCAL-_ 67'-2" 127'-0" __ __ _ SIDE ELEVATION (LOOK1NGSOLrrHEAST) SCALE: 3/16''= 1' 75'-2" ~ 49'-1" I~' 15'-1" 34'-1" ~ RED CANOPY, RED S A WI-lITE BACKOROUND ~/DRYVIT STUCCO 7 E STEEL BOLLARDS, RP.D TO CITGO ;TEEL COLUMNS, RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO INSERT RUBBER GASKET BETWEEN -- BUILDING CANOPY AND CANOPY ABOVE GAS PUMP AREA. DO NOT MECHANICALLY ATTACH BOTH CANOPIES BOARD RED TO MATCH CANOPY AND CITGO LOGO ALL EXTERIOR WALL TO BE -- SPLIT FACE CONC. MASONRY UNITS. COLOR: WHITE, TYPICAL 67'-2" 127'-0" ff~,~ SIDE LEVATION O~oor~oso~THw~s~ ~ SCALE: 3/16''= 1' 10'-0" WIDE X 8'-0" HIGH OVERHEAD DOORS FOR CAR WASH- RED TO MATCH STOREFRONT 59'-10" AT AI,I, CORNERS JONATHAN HUTTICK ARCHITECT 640 SUNRISE HIGHWY W BABYLON NY 11704 T 631 321 7777 F 631 661 0486 ISSUED FOR FILING: MAY. 30.2006 DOB NOV. 22.2005 DOB REVISED: 05-30-06 E.R. SCTM# 1000-142-01-27 A-2 KEY BOTANICAL NAME LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE COMMON NAME RED OAK HEMLOCK QUERCUS BOKEALIS RUBRA KEY MAP - SCALE AS SHOWN ® ® SIZE QUANT frY 4" min. cal.. 11 30" dia. 18"-24' H 61 7'H 30" dia. 93 281 RtIODODENDRON PRINOPI-IYLLUM AZALEA THUSA OCCIDENTALIS NIGRA AMERICAN ARBOR VITAE PROCUMBEN NANA CREEPING JUNIPER (GROUND OCVER) CHRYSANTHBML~Ivl NIPPON MONTAUK DAISEY lit" dia, 30 VARIOUS FLOWBRS ASSORTED ANNUALS 12" dia. TO FILL PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES SATACEUM FOUNTAIN GRASS 15" dia. 39 JUNIPERUS HORIZOI~ALIS WILTONI CREEPING JUNIPER 12"-15" H 70 41 5. Pi~OVII~ ~ BI~(I-~ CN~ PAVINGAI{E~ WIIH~RELI~Ii~Rq AI~D ~II~AI./I~G b~Al~lj 6. PROVII~ ~ WAI~WA]11~ AT FP/)NT ~ARE~ 7. Street~ Stre/ttrees~h arr/nim,lllce/iperdfotrindle~d21110el:/af/edand/ofii~irteinedac[_a?~t_ loeil roadf~ in~v~hTo~n 1Z Buildino-n-aJ'~8:l liohl fixkre8 8h/dl ~ for s, ddy or ~igneoe pul:x)Be~ only end rmB~ dmcHiffll dv, mAad. ~ I~ w ~ I~ ~ ~ 13. Decora~ stmellighlsof mt n'~rethm 12 feti in height a"eJI be u'ii3wly appliecl, iratalled and rneJnlained ~,~tingdea~kculoas evay3Ofeeion ALL SITE INFORMATION IS DASED UPON ,[iC[i'.6~L~i~i{~.A~qIRIECTIJO'r: 24~140SQ. Fr.(0.55A(~x~S) ~--'/~13 P t~ ~ A SURVEY DATED 02/16/06, JOB NO. 06013, BY; ~~R~~n~.~RY~,~,(0.918~ o~,~ ~ ~.~ _MOLLMUTH ~ BPUSH ~~t.t~_~~~o~w~ ? /~, I Ne-~i-bm~ pAVm~P~]~ 1~9~. - N48'57 0 E , ~ ' ' ~ ~p~ t,~i ~. ~., (.~/o) ~t' ~y~ ~P~ O~ B~~ ~ / BL~.D~G 4,422 SQ.~. 1.0 . ' .... L PROPOSED I ~ R~CO~.[ FT. oF~ I ~.~.~T~ION~Q'D PA~ 15 3~ SQ.~. 1.0 .167 2~61 ~.FT. Btm.n~O 6,9~SQ.~. 10 I 3,740~.~. { 5 ~ -- - "* ~ ~ll .~?~..ow~ ~ I~Jl t) ~'1' ~G ~ lff'0" ~ = 547'4 CU' ~' OF STOOGE ~.~ (1) SPACE / 200 SQ, FT. OFA (I 0) CAR. QUal,~IO / BAY ( 1 o) CAR QUEUING PROPOSED PARKINg / UEUING (6) ~PACBS, INCL. (I)HANDICAP (S) C.~.S QI~INO 26,23 AREA: 24,140.48 sq ft 0.55 ACRE DATUM: NGVD 29 PROPOSED GAS STATION, CONVENIENCE STORE, CAR WASH SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" f ,)iL/J: ,. }q MAY 16~116 I ONATHAN UTTICK 1 ARCHITECT 640 SUNRISE HIGI-IVO~ W BABYLON NY 11704 T 631 321 7777 F 631 661 0486 ISSUED: NOV. 22.2005 DOB APRIL 21, 2005 PB SITE PLAN SP-1 SCAI,E AS NOTED :,~-~-- ,, IJONATHAN' ~~ ~ ~=-.. 2 4.~..~.~o~o~) 2 ~' [ Ix''~ ...... ~"~ ~.~o~ ~ ~ ~ ~" ,~. ,~ ~,~. - - I ' ~ C - - - ~w - ..... ~ ~ ~ _ ~us~ ~c~c. ~"~"~i~ ~, ~ , , ~ ~--~,,. ~TTTTUD R,~mD~*~DAT~ l.-~d~d~by~~.~aIM~sof~o / IT6313217777 14"D~.xY~"D~P {"~.' ~ ~, , ~' ~ / i1' ~Jx o~l ~o~ ~SP-2 J . ST~ET ~P~R DETAIL .. · ,.z_ )L _ _ __.._. - ~ A ~_~_~_~, .- -.-. '-,'. ' ..--- . ...,,, .,., HHHHH, L ' -- I ~ ., - ,,.. ., ...'. ~f" .: .....-: ,~;~o~,~w.-?~w~~,~m~w~. r~m~mw ~ / ~"* '* / 7 5 SECTION A-A , -.- ,~.~?3Z~i, ~ sv-2, LEACHING BASra DET~ ON SITE '. se-2/ 7 ,%F ~-.,~, ,', ,~,,t '. :: ~- - , ...- , - _. __IU