Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-59.-10-1
NO~'TH LAY, IN NO~.TH P-..OAP C, OUNT'f' ~OA~ 48 COUNTY' ~0~ EX I 5TI N~ LA.~N LA~N COUNTY' ~XI~TINm= LAI,~N \ I Tree LIf~II~, ~ 2 ~ el~l TILL IO PM, TYPIGAL LA~'~ LAI~IN ~/ANTIN¢¢ LA~N LAY"IN LAP, IN PARTIAL SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" REVISED: September 28, 2009 ~O~EC~O: 0~7. D~WN BY: NS & UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: JULY 14, 2008 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE -ANDSCAPIN( & LIGHTING PLAN EET NO: AS BUILT - SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 4 -- J,,'t ENTP-,.'r' AND EXIT N 25' 4 F~e~, tYtO UPLI~HTD% PEf~ DI¢N~ NEY'I DI~N AT IDtalVE~IA¥ EN'r'P, IED LEi i~f~D ON A LICHT C, ONTP,,ADTIN~ OOL OP--,, BAC. K---,.~P--,OUND~ No TH ENTf~h" ONLY OIL BLUECTONE I0 ~PA~E5 GONDTt~,UGTION OF GUP.~ DI~N \/ ~TONE GLIt~IBIN~, TYPIC, AL PAt~,.<.I ND OIL AND BLU=~TONE TCJI~I=AGIN~ ON A~PHALT I~ ~PAGI~ DP-,.IVEP4A¥ TO BE C, LODED, P,,ElviO'v"E DP,.IVEP, IAY' PAVEMENT R. EPLAOE }filtH TOPDOIL AND LAI,'~N & t~t HI~,H FENC'~ /; ~ITH Pi~IVAG¥ PAt~K-..IN¢ Oil ANI~ ., ]:.]-',: ~ BLU~TONE ', ' ' .~JFk~A~IN~ ON A~PHALT ~TOHE CUR~IN~ 'J"~ICAh LU O GR. LJDHINC-~'LOAPlN~ "/'B II U PAV~Iv~NT -I~. HETAi f~AILIN~ ~ 20' [ = W- ~ ~1~= YA~ ~ ~. NOTE= DEE DHEET #D, FOt~. OVERALL DI'f'E PLAN PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" [] 20'-0" PARKING CALCULATIONS RETAIL AREA 037 SFI200 SFISPACE OFFICE AREA 613 SFll00 SFISPACE TASTING ROOM 41 ?0 SFI200 SFISPACE STORAGE AREA 3306 SFI10~0SFISPACE PRODUCTION AREA 2415 SFIS00 SFISPACE TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 4.1 SPACES 8.1 SPACES 20.8 SPACES 3.3 SPACES 4.6 SPACES 4t .1 OR 41 SPACES 41 SPACES W/2 H.C LOCATION MAP APPROVED BY ..... ¢. ,, 'c , ~) yoers ~om tho date, ofai~proval SCTM # PROPERTY: ADDRESS OWNER: SITE: ZONING: SURVEYOR: BUILDING: AREA LOT: COVERAGE PARKING: LANDSCAPING: 486,813 SQ FT I 1000-59-10-1 39750 CR 48 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 THOMAS P. ROSICKI CYNTHIA ROSICKI (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) 526,560 SQ. FT. = 12.088 AC A-C STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR PO BOX 294 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11966 LICENSE # 49273 DATED 18 AUGUST 2006 TOTAL: 17,1896Q. FT. WINERY (foot print): 7,662 SQ. FT. CRUSH PAD: 2,885 SCI. FT. OUTDOOR TERRACES: 6,642 SQ. FT. 3.3% ACTUAL I 20% MAX. ALLOWABLE 22,558 SQ FT / 4.3 % LOT COVERAGE 92.5 % LOT COVERAGE TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION 'NO: 061t DRAWN BY: NS & UT NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEETNO: 1 ~ REVISED: 6LEA~ AT TH~ GO~L~TION ~TO~ ~t ex EL 3S.03 ~ ~ ' ~ ~m P~JE~T x ~ e~L 3~.62 ~ ~& 35,09 I ~ ' ~--~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J J -- ' A~V~ ~ ~' ~ ' . ~ / I I ~ ~ '/ ~ o~ _--. ~ ~,.~ ~ I ~ mia x 4 D (ST) J ~ J ~ I L OLD' OVERALL ¢1 t b PLAN ,._., E~AN¢ION POOL TEST HOLE .~,,,~,c.o.,~. SITE DATA I ~ GEOSClENCE . . I NO SCALE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 SCTM ~ 1000-59 10 1 I SCALE: 1" = 30'~" ~~~"'A~-- __.... TEST HOLE DATA, ( 5/29/07) . J' SHEET TITLE: 1~ D~K BROWN SIL~ LOAM OL PROPERS. 397~ CR ~ IAL SITE PLAN ,...,s, SOUTHOLD. NY11971 3 FT, BROWN SlE~ S~D SM OWNER: THOMAS P. ROSICKI SITE ~L~. ] ~U u CYNTHIA ROSlCKI (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) / UTILITIES PALE BROWN FINE SP - TO MEDIUM SAND SITE: .526,560 Se. ~. - ~2.0SS ~C J PLAN ZONING. A-C / 21 ~. SURVEYOR: STANLEY J, ISAKSEN, JR J PO BOX 294 j SHEET NO: NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION SCDHS SUBMISSlONI ~ REVISIONS: ~ 7130107 I 8115107 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: SANITARY CALCULATIONS ZONING I 8/30/0? ROOF AREA OF NEW WINERY I. ALLOWABLE DENSITY ZONING AC I DRY,W,.,E,I.L AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR TOTAL ACERAGE: 2.0t9 ACRES (NON PLANTED VINEYARD) (DW) A . 7,8~7,7SF. X 121.1,2FT.) X ¶.82'I,313CU. FT. HYDROGEOLOGICAL ZONE: ZONE IV FARM SEE ENLARGED SlTE /~ LB USE. (2) 8, DIAMETER x 5, HIGH POOLS WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER --------. PLAN SHE =_T #1 ~ ZONING 6 8 DIAMETER x 4 HIGH POOLS ' I Acres x 600 GPD - 1 206 GPD I 8' )~ 10' STORM DRAIN RING -- 422.5 CU. FT. ALLOWABLE DENSITY. 2.0 0 .- , 61 8' X 4' STORM DRAIN RING = 1~0t3.4 CU. FT. SITE DENSITY CALCULATION F~M RESIDENCE ~ ~ . AC '1,435.9 CU. FT. WINERY: ~ J~O.~JD~.D- ~ 1. TASTING ROOM (8 GPDIOccupant} ENC~ PARKING AREAS TOR 2 OFFICE SPACE 10.06 GPD/SF) DRY,W,,E. LL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFFFAC ' 0.06GPDX804SF =48.26PD ~ ~ ~ ~ I / USE:(2) !0DIAMETERx7 HIGHPOOL 0.04GPDXS,203SF=208.1GPD ~ ~ ~--~ . - (~ -- -- ~--~ {2)'10'.X._7. STORMDRAINRINO= 9$8CU. FT. 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPDISF) /' ~ -~/'~"-~-'~~ NORTH ROAD C, oUN7~ mob ~ ~ REQUIRED 0.03 GPD X 979 SF = 29.4 GPD 958 CU. FT. > 878 CU. FT. DRY ,W,,,E. LL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR TOTAL SITE DENSITY FLOW = 7'40.7 GPD , ~/ /'~~"~'~''//"'~-~-'~------~['~/'-'~~' "~ J/ surmu~ cout, rn, ~-~ __ L_..~ ~ (DW) C 4,152SF. X (2112.F,T.) X 0.9=623CU. FT. PROJECT NOT OVER DENSITY / r~~...._.~__.~_ ~'~ ~"~'~ ~ I~.,/ I VACANT ~ .~_~ USE:(1) 8'DIAMETERx6 HIGHPOOL [ ~~~~u.~,., ~ ) // ~, ii/ .~ USE: ~2, 6' D,AMETE. x9 .,G..OOL .......... ._. / ~/L~"~?~ ~~ ~._,..,~~~ ~ 11) 8' X 6' STORM DRA N R NG = 253 CU. FT. II. EANItAK¥ Ut=5 ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ · ' '~' ~ / 111111, 929 CU. FT. > 623 CU. FT. 7,5 GPD X 9'1 Occupants = 682.5 GPD D.~,W,.~,~L AREA X RAI.FALL X RU.OFFFACTOR 2. OF.CESPACEp.06GP=SF) "- ~"~ USE: ~21 ,0' D,AME.rE. x ?' ,,O. PO_O.~ ..... 3. W,, VgO...".U~'~O.Na?..0~ %"0D~.~F}.D 12) '10' X 7' STORM DRAIN RING = sau ~u. r'/. ,, .............. - - .P_BO3/IDED REQUIRED 4, RETAIL (0,03 GPDISF) Z lNG - ~ 058 CU. FT, > 862 CU. FT. 0.03 GPD X 979 SF = 29.4 GPD ~.~l~t ~ L ~ - , I , \ '~'L~ [ I I I I I I uNP~k'r~ ~R~- 2.0m D.Y.W..~,~L A.EA XRAI.FALL X .U.OFFFACTOR SEWAGEFLOW--909.~GPD (DW) E _.5.,320S,F,. X (21'12F,T,.) X 0.9=798CU. FT. TOTAL SITE SEWAGEFLOW=968.2GPD I ~ ~ h .'T~' / I I '. NJJIJ I[I] I~m~m-~~FFI SAN,TA.YSYSTEM.EOU,REMEN'rS ~ // ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ I! / ~.]11111il1111[11111 ][]11111111 o~ ~. =. > 798 CU. FT ~.SEPTIC TANK (ST): 968.2 GPD x 2 DAY FLOW = 1,936.4 GAL ~ Z O ~,~,o,~.s~o,..RA,,.,,o~ .,~cu... ~.~c,,,~,oo~s~,~.,..~,,.~.,.,o,.-~.~s.~. m m B B ./ ~,~°~m~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~.,oo,.~.~I ~ REQUIRED USE MINIMUM ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X 9 ~. HT.) ~ ~ / ~ su~ --u~ ~ ~A ~ ~ ~ ~ P~ ~ ' I 1094CU.~, > t068CU. FT. EFFECTI~DEPTH(3-8FT.~IA, X8.67FT. HT.)=650.25S.F. I ~ / ~ L wA~R~ I1~ ~ ~rSTINe III. WASTE WATER PROCESSING ~ / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ,~ .~,~=.~.~. ~.~...~..o.uc.,o.~.~ ~ II/ ~ ~ ~ FF ~b ~.~ ~ /~ I' HI~. 2 H~. WASH DOWN OF ~NE MAKING EQUIPMEN.r 395 GPD I/~ ~T. L ,/~"~,J, I I TOP O~ POOL WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: ~ /I ~H~_I~.... ~1 ~oOL I 1.SETTLEMENT TANK: 395 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOWt = 790 GAL / //I / ~ _ ~-~ / / I ~E ~4/ I TAN~ I ~1 I~o~P~L (1) I,200GALSE~LEMENTTANK(STL)(8FTIDIAx4FTLD) I I / '/I /- , ~ / / / / ':"C- ...,. ...... ~.~EAc.,,~,oo~s~.~,.,,.~.*...~ ~~ ~ / ~':/~~ ~ = ~ , ' ' = USE ~0 ~ DIA x 10 FT HT POOL (LP). WASTE WATER PROFILE FOR WlNERY PLUS~%~PANS,ON(,XP):,0~TD,Ax,0--HT ~ ~~ ~:~ / ./' // SYSTEM ~2, NO SCALE ~ ~ ' / / / I I ~ ~ I~ / / / ~ ~o~ ~ .0,, / APPR~VE~ Bv I FP EL ~4.0 , ~ ....... ,o' ~E~.SFT. , ~ ~~, ~ . I .. - E_ ,, I_ _, SITE ......... PLA / SEPTIC PROFILE FOR WINERY SYSTEM ~1, NO SCALE INLET TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL SEPTIC SYSTEM SEPTIC TANK - 2000 GALLON N.T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM GREASE TRAP ..T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL WASTE WATER SYSTEM o oh SETTLEMENT TANK - 12oo GALLON N.T.S. WASTE WATER SYSTEM TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION SCDHS SUBMISSION IDATE:A4'SuC-r 7, zc~cq SCALE: 1" = t00'-0" SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN DETAILS :ALCULATION.~ SHEET NO: 3 NOFn-..TH HIgH LA~IN NORTH ROA~ C..,OUNT"r' P-,OA:[:? 46 GOUNT'r' P.,OIA[ LA~IN ~n~be, Hu~r~ngae, ~ gal Azaleas, 5 g~l, Holllee, HIgH LINE POLE · C ee A · I, flALL HOUN ~ PLOODLIGHT~, IO~O · A * · C · · A · · C · I~LL HC~JN ~ ED P. AHP L I GHTS, I~PI GF, E~:~A 252OP, J~IALL HOUN i tED ~] EP L I GHTS, ~25 ~ Nea plOr~ln~e ~hrube, t~jdran§a~, S gal, Azalea, B o~al, Hollfea, C, EILING NOUN I ED DOPIN LIGHTS, qSO PARKING AREA POLE LIGHT,G,, lOP, I, IDECA ¢14.1 IcH, 6,CO0 LUHEN~ FAC, A~E UPLIGHT¢, i t~EE UPLIGH'I'-~, ~0~ ~E~A q~O LUMEN5 PIALK~IA'r' LIGHT5, BOI~ BE~A 21~5, T~onepl~f~d E~r~j ~-.4~" h~ \ EXISTINg, \ D~IVE~L~¥ \ TO BE 4e~b =l~a'~lngm Hollywood Jun~r-~ S f~ h~ LAY, IN ornamental P~htjm~dra 5" GAL. LAY, IN ~ILIN~ HGUNT~ ON/ 5b" APPR iD BY PLANNING ~OARD TOWN OF " A · PARTIAL SITE LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1" [] 20'-0" DIGN UPLIGHTD, I1~0 LJ. IHEN~ TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION REVISED September 6, 2007 October 29, 2007 uJI -JI .4.[ "'" -J: ""' ~i,,. = DRAWN BY: NS & UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE .ANDSCAPIN¢ & LIGHTING PLAN ;HEET NO: 4 I~ETAI/ ~T~ O O O TA~TIN~ TA~TIN~ R, OOM MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE:: 118" = 1'-0" OFPIGE CON~L~REN~E OPEN TO Pt;~OI~UC, TION E~LOI~ C4~JJe, H I Ni~/I_oA~ I NG AREA E~I..OI~ I-' --~PPROV~D BY~ PLANNING BOARD TOWN O~ SOUTHOLD DATJ~ I/ i~t/b7 TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: SHEET TITLE: MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO: 5 DI..AID ON GI~'~DtD AIDOVE /IEBI~A~¥ R. IZ21DLIN~ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN TOIleT SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" GI~,,I~H I NiG,/J_OA~ I N~ AI~,EA T()W~ OF $OLJTHOLD DATE TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION OI .-II CHECKED BY: NS DATE: AUGUST 7,2007 SCALE: SHEET ~TLE: LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO: 6 .... .... III I I ~ I I I I I I NEW ADDITION NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'4)" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118"= 1'-0" APPRO,/',,::D ~Y PI..ANH~NG BOARD TO\~q~l OF S©UTHOLD MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH ROOF: ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES LEAD COATED COPPER AT CURVED WINDOWS WIINDOWS/DOORS: ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS TRIM/CASING PAINTED WOOD TRIM CHIMNEY/TERRACE WALLS: DRY LAID STONE TERRACES: RANDOM BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM PAINTED WOOD RAILING AT HC RAMP CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: TYPE 5A -WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION mi CHECKED BY: NS DATE: AUGUST ?, 2007 SCALE: 110"=1'-0" SHEET TITLE: NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS SHEET NO: 7 EXISTING BUILDING WITH NEW ENTRY .t NEW ADDITION WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 118"= 1'-0" CRUSHING PAD BELOW RAMP BELOW EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8' = 1'4)" APPROVED ,~*. PLANNIHG BOAP. D TOWN OF $OUTHOLD DATE MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH ROOF: ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES LEAD COATED COPPER AT CURVED WINDOWS WIINDOWS/DOORS: ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS TRIM/CASING PAINTED WOOD TRIM CHIMNEY/TERRACE WALLS: DRY LAID STONE TERRACES: RANDOM BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM AT CRUSHING PAD PAINTED WOOD RAILING AT HC RAMP CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: TYPE 5A -WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION u. II I-I OI .-II PROJECT NO: 0611 DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS ~ATE: AUGUST 7, 2007 SCALE: tl8"=1 '~" SHEET TITLE: WEST & EAST ELEVATIONS SHEET NO: 8 NOFn-..TH HIgH LA~IN NORTH ROA~ C..,OUNT"r' P-,OA:[:? 46 GOUNT'r' P.,OIA[ LA~IN ~n~be, Hu~r~ngae, ~ gal Azaleas, 5 g~l, Holllee, HIgH LINE POLE · C ee A · I, flALL HOUN ~ PLOODLIGHT~, IO~O · A * · C · · A · · C · I~LL HC~JN ~ ED P. AHP L I GHTS, I~PI GF, E~:~A 252OP, J~IALL HOUN i tED ~] EP L I GHTS, ~25 ~ Nea plOr~ln~e ~hrube, t~jdran§a~, S gal, Azalea, B o~al, Hollfea, C, EILING NOUN I ED DOPIN LIGHTS, qSO PARKING AREA POLE LIGHT,G,, lOP, I, IDECA ¢14.1 IcH, 6,CO0 LUHEN~ FAC, A~E UPLIGHT¢, i t~EE UPLIGH'I'-~, ~0~ ~E~A q~O LUMEN5 PIALK~IA'r' LIGHT5, BOI~ BE~A 21~5, T~onepl~f~d E~r~j ~-.4~" h~ \ EXISTINg, \ D~IVE~L~¥ \ TO BE 4e~b =l~a'~lngm Hollywood Jun~r-~ S f~ h~ LAY, IN ornamental P~htjm~dra 5" GAL. LAY, IN ~ILIN~ HGUNT~ ON/ 5b" APPR iD BY PLANNING ~OARD TOWN OF " A · PARTIAL SITE LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1" [] 20'-0" DIGN UPLIGHTD, I1~0 LJ. IHEN~ TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION REVISED September 6, 2007 October 29, 2007 uJI -JI .4.[ "'" -J: ""' ~i,,. = DRAWN BY: NS & UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE .ANDSCAPIN¢ & LIGHTING PLAN ;HEET NO: 4 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMEILS PIERCE RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 April 10, 2013 Ms. Nancy Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Winery Addition Located at 39750 CR 48, +682' east of Ackerly Pond Lane and CR 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zoning District: A-C Dear Ms. Steelman: The Planning Board has found that the requirements of the above-referenced site plan have been completed based on the site inspection made February 20, 2013 and the submitted affidavit by John D. Hocker, P.E., dated February 27, 2013. The site is now in conformance with the approved site plan entitled "Sparkling Pointe Addition", prepared by Samuels & Steelman Architects, dated November 23, 2012. This letter does not condone any changes from the approved site plan and approvals from other agencies; Planning Board approval is required prior to any significant changes to the site. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Donald J. Wilcenski Chairman CC: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer GRAVEL, INC. 35180 Route 48 * P.O. Box 608 · Peconic, NY I 1958 Office (631 ) 734-6800 · FAX (631) 734-2318 Febmary27,2013 Southold Town Engineering Department James A. Richter, RA Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 planning B~rd Re: Conformance to SWPPP requirements for Sparkling Pointe Winery Addition Between 5/16/12 and 8/17/12, Latham Sand and Gravel performed the excavation work required for the construction of an addition to Sparkling Pointe Winery located on Route 48, Southold. The work was done in conformance with the approved site plan dated 3/13/12. Temporary erosion control hay bales were installed and removed upon completion. Four drywells including 2~8'x8' and 2@8'x5 were installed as per plan with proper roof drainage piping. The soil conditions will provide acceptable percolation for the drainage structures. Yours truly, John D. Hocker, P.E. Vice President Marine Conslmction * Dredging · Precast Cesspools * Gravel * Fill · Topsoil · Excavating and Land Development PLANNING ]BOARD MEMBERS DONALD J. WILCENSKI Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS PIERCR RAFFERTY JAMES H. RICH III MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southaid, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 February 26, 2013 Ms. Nancy Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Addition Located at 39750 CR 48, +/-682' e/o Ackerl Pond y Rd, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zoning District: A-C Dear Ms. Steelman: With reference to the Work Session held on February 25, 2013, please be advised that the Planning Board determined the requirement of the following after their review of final site inspection comments with regard to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: Please submit a drainage affidavit from a licensed engineer to ensure that what was constructed on site strictly meets or surpasses the drainage requirements and design approved by the Planning Board and Town Engineer according to Chapter 236 for Storm Water Management. Please, if you have any questions regarding this site plan or its process, do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, Brian Cummings Planner WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, February 25, 2013 2:30 p.m. Executive Board Room, Town Hall Annex Applications: Location: 71855 CR 48~ ~tchogue Description: This amended site plan is for a 8'6" pole extension to co-locate a wireless communication facility of 6 antennas (2 per sector) on an existing 100'5" , .m0nopole and install related base equipment in aLI.Zoning District. Status: Approved Site Plan Action: Review comments from Fna Inspection. Attachments; Draft Letter Project name Sparkling Pointe Addition ~: SCTM#: 1000-59-10-1 Location: .39750 CR 48, Southold D~c~iptioni 7~rt~is amendment to a site plan is for the addition of a 12'4" x 21'4" office ;~ along with the enclosure of an existing 56' x 50'6" area that currently :: operates as a paved outdoor crushing area and the addition of a 23'6" x ~; 50'6" covered crushing pad, all for employee access only, to the existing ~: tasting room site of Sparkling Pointe Winery on a 12.088 acre parcel in the ~:~ Zoning Dis~(ic~: Status: Action: Attachments: DraE Le~er Project name Sparkl ng Po nte Warehouse . SCTM# 1000769;373 LOCation: !270 CR 48, Southold Description: ' This site plan application is for a 46' x 120' warehouse, for employee use only, with a 16' x 18' accessory office and bathroom on a 1.002 acre parcel in a Light Industrial Zoning District on Old North Road, Southold. Fgur parking stalls are proposed and an asphalt ddvewaY~ Status: .~,pproved Site Plan Action iRevewc0mmentsfr0mEna nsPecton Attachments: Draft Letter Project Name: G.W. Meade Farm SCTM# 1000-69-5-7.1 Location: 1375 Ackerly Pond Lane Southold Description: This site plan is for the proposed construction of a 5,200 s.f. horse barn connecting to a 14,400 s.f. indoor arena for the keeping/breeding/raising and training of horses and a riding academy with 10 parking spaces. Aisc on the property are a 1,140 s.f. single-family dwelling, a 1,965 s.f. frame barn and a 700 s.f. frame building on 10.004 acres in the A-C Zoning District. Status: Action: Rev!ew revised site p!an. Attachments: Staff Report Plannlng~oard Site Inspection Record Project Name ~_~(~..[~ ~._ ~.(~ Tax Map# .5~.-[~)-I Attending: ~C Pumo.se of site visit..~-~-tx~ ~:j~ q'q._ kC~ Notes: MS4 Reporting Illicit discharge on or near site? If Yes, briefly describe: Y orN (provide copy of this report to Town Stormwater Manager) B~t~ni Builde?s i380 OAKWOOD DRIVE 5OUTHOLD, NY 11971 631-765-1594 February ii, 2013 Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Threshold Blue LLC (Sparkling Point Winery Addition) 39750 County Road 48, Southold, NY 11971 To Whom It May Concern: We are respectfully requesting that a fina~ inspection be made on the above. Thank you. Sincerely, Linda D. Bertani Vice President PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND November 20, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NYl1971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Ms. Nancy Steelman c/o Samuels and Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Winery Located on the s/s/o CR 48, approximately 1,699 ft. w/o Tucker Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zoning District: AC Dear Ms. Steelman: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 19, 2007: WHEREAS, this site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq. ft. of production area on a 12.088- acre parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold. SCTM#1000- 59-10-1; and WHEREAS, Thomas P. Rosicki is the owner of the property known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 2007, the Southold Town Planning Board closed the final public hearing; and WHEREAS, on September 10,2007, the Southold Town Planning Board granted approval on the site plan set 1-8 prepared by Samuels & Steelman and certified by Nancy L. Steelman, Architect, dated as follows: Plan Numbers 1,5, 6, 7 & 8 are dated August 7, 2007, Plan Numbers 2 & 3 are dated August 30, 2007 and Plan Number 4 is dated September 6, 2007, and authorized the Chairperson to endorse the site plan after the revised landscape plan is submitted and approved by the Planning Board with the following conditions: 1. The owner, agent and/or applicant proposed to enhance/change the landscape on the County Road 48 Frontage and submit a revised landscape plan Drawing Number 4 detailing the landscape enhancements/changes to be reviewed and approved by the Southold Town Planning Board. The owner, agent and/or applicant proposed to install signage that strictly prohibits bus use of the site and install such signage to the satisfaction of the Southold Town Planning Board. The owner, agent and/or applicant shall receive approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for the approved construction and submit such approval to the Southold Town Planning Department for review. If such approval varies from this approved site plan, the Planning Board reserves the right to review a new site plan application. A copy of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services approved plan must be submitted to the Southold Town Planning Department within thirty (30) days of receipt. If applicant/agent/owner fails to adhere to this requirement, this approval shall become null and void. The owner, agent and/or appl'icant shall apply for a changed approval from the Southold Town ZBA for the landscape changes as shown on this site plan or must meet the condition as imposed by the ZBA in Appeal #5520 and revise the approved site plan landscape as required. The owner, agent and/or applicant shall receive permit approval from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works for the approved construction and submit such approval to the Southold Town Planning Department for review. If such approval varies from this approved site plan, the Planning Board reserves the right to review a new site plan application. A copy of the Suffolk County Department of Public Works approved plan must be submitted to the Southold Town Planning Department within thirty (30) days of receipt. If applicant/agent/owner fails to adhere to this requirement, this approval shall become null and void. If necessary, the applicant/agent/owner must obtain a Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC) for the approved construction. A copy of the NYS DEC SPDES Permit must be submitted to the Southold Town Planning Department within thirty (30) days of receipt. The owner, agent and/or applicant agrees to build out the site and install all handicap parking stalls, access aisles and signage in compliance with New York State Code and ADA Requirements. The owner, agent and/or applicant understands and agrees that the Southold Town Building Department will review the approved proposed build out under a Building Permit Application and that all construction must meet or exceed the required codes and this site plan approval is subject to change to conform to any requirement of Local & State Regulations as applied during the building permit review. 9. The site plan approval requires that all work proposed on the site plan shall be completed within three (3) years from the date of this resolution. 10. Prior to the request for the Certificate of Occupancy, the owner or authorized agent must request, in writing, the said Building Inspector and the Planning Board to perform an on-site inspection to find the site improvements are in conformity with the approved site plan. 11. Prior to the request for an on-site inspection, the applicant/agent/owner must submit a copy of all required approvals from any necessary agencies to the Southold Town Planning Department. 12. Upon inspection, if the as-built site improvements vary from the approved site plan, the Planning Board reserves the right to request a certified as-built site plan detailing all the changes. 13.Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval, and any such changes without Planning Board approval will be subject to referral to the Town Attorney's Office for possible legal action. 14.The Planning Board will issue a final site plan approval in the form of a letter following a site inspection and at the time the site improvements are found to be in conformance with the approved site plan. 15.The owner, agent and/or applicant must provide and ensure all necessary safety precautions are implemented before, during and upon completion of any construction at the site for anyone on the site as may be required by all authorities having jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, on September 27, 2007, Ural Talgat submitted the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Acknowledgement of the Notice of Intent for SPEDES General Permit No. GP-02-02 and this satisfies the requirement of Condition Number 6 of the approval granted on September 11,2007; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2007, Ural Talgat submitted a revised site plan and the Planning Board held a Work Session on October 29, 2007 to review the revised landscape plan which satisfies the requirement of Condition Number 1 of the approval granted on September 11, 2007; and WHEREAS, on October 18, 2007, Ural Talgat submitted a site utilities plan stamped approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services with Reference Number C10-07-0008 for a winery and the Planning Board held a Work Session on October 29, 2007 to review the revised landscape plan which satisfies the requirement of Condition Number 3 of the approval granted on September 11,2007; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that pursuant to Southold Town Code 280-131 Part I, the applicant agrees to incorporate all the requirements, comments, and recommendations of each reviewing agency as referenced above and as indicated on the site plan and corresponding attachments including the previously issued resolution dated September 11,2007; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant approval on the site plan set 1-8 prepared by Samuels & Steelman and certified by Nancy L. Steelman Architect, dated as follows: Plan Numbers 1, 5, 6, 7 & 8 are dated August 7, 2007, Plan Numbers 2 & 3 are dated August 30, 2007 and Plan Number 4 is dated September 6, 2007 and last revised October 29, 2007, and authorize the Chairperson to endorse the site plan set approved by the Planning Board with the following conditions: The owner, agent and/or applicant proposed to install signage that strictly prohibits bus use of the site and install such signage to the satisfaction of the Southold Town Planning Board. The owner, agent and/or applicant shall apply for a change in approval from the Southold Town ZBA for the landscape changes as shown on this site plan or must meet the condition as imposed by the ZBA in Appeal #5520 and revise the approved site plan landscape as required. A copy of the ZBA approved plan must be submitted to the Southold Town Planning Department within thirty (30) days of receipt. If applicant/agent/owner fails to adhere to this requirement, this approval shall become null and void. The owner, agent and/or applicant shall receive permit approval from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works for the approved construction and submit such approval to the Southold Town Planning Department for review. If such approval varies from this approved site plan, the Planning Board reserves the right to review a new site plan application. A copy of the Suffolk County Department of Public Works approved plan must be submitted to the Southold Town Planning Department within thirty (30) days of receipt. If applicant/agent/owner fails to adhere to this requirement, this approval shall become null and void. The owner, agent and/or applicant agrees to build out the site and install all handicap parking stalls, access aisles and signage in compliance with New York State Code and ADA Requirements. The owner, agent and/or applicant understands and agrees that the Southold Town Building Department will review the approved proposed build out under a Building Permit Application and that all construction must meet or exceed the required codes and this site plan approval is subject to change to conform to any requirement of Local & State Regulations as applied during the building permit review. 6. The site plan approval requires that all work proposed on the site plan shall be completed within three (3) years from the date of this resolution. 7. Prior to the request for the Certificate of Occupancy, the owner or authorized agent must request, in writing, the said Building Inspector and the Planning 4 Board to perform an on-site inspection to find the site improvements are in conformity with the approved site plan. Prior to the request for an on-site inspection, the applicant/agent/owner must submit a copy of all required approvals from any necessary agencies to the Southold Town Planning Department. Upon inspection, if the as-built site improvements vary from the approved site plan, the Planning Board reserves the right to request a certified as-built site plan detailing all the changes. 10.Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval, and any such changes without Planning Board approval will be subject to referral to the Town Attorney's Office for possible legal action. 11.The Planning Board will issue a final site plan approval in the form ora letter following a site inspection and at the time the site improvements are found to be in conformance with the approved site plan. 12.The owner, agent and/or applicant must provide and ensure all necessary safety precautions are implemented before, during and upon completion of any construction at the site for anyone on the site as may be required by all authorities having jurisdiction. Attached you will find,~,h~ copies of the approved site plan and, as per the Town Code, a copy will be distributed to the Building Department, Town Engineer and Town Zoning Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, house Chairperson encl. cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Public Works w/o map PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MARTIN H. SIDOR Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND October 14, 2009 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Samuels & Steelman Architects Att: Nancy Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: Site Plan For Sparkling Pointe - Final Inspection SCTM# 1000-59-10-1 Dear Ms. Steelman: As per your request, the Planning Board discussed the changes made to the approved site plan for the above application. The Board determined that the requested changes were amendable to the plan provided that you submit the request in writing and as-built plan for review. On October 8, 2009, Planning Board members and staff performed a site inspection of the site in connection to your request for a final inspection. The site visit was discussed at the following works session where it was determined that the work done to date is in conformance with the as built site plans dated August 7, 2009 discussed and approved by the Planning Board. However, the Board agreed that parking bumpers are necessary and will need to be installed to designate parking in the parking areas. Once you complete the work, contact planning staff so that we may inspect the work. For your convenience you may submit hand written notations on the as-built plans for the file. It should be noted that any future requested change to the site plan should include a copy of the approved stamped site plan noting the location of the requested change. If you have any questions regarding the above, contact me anytime. Thank you. Kristy Winser Senior Planner Cc: Planning Board Heather Lanza, Planning Director Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer 25235 Main Road, Cutchogue NY 11935 (631)7346405 Fax (631) 734 6407 To: Kristy Winser, Sr. Planner From: Nancy Steelman Address:Planning Board Date: October 19, 2009 Town of Southold CC: Re: Sparkling Pointe [] Urgent x For Review [] Please Comment [] Please Reply · Description: Revise Site Plan (Drawing #1) with Parking Bumpers 25235 Main Road, Cutchogue NY 11935 (631) 734 64O5 Fax (631) 734 6407 To-' Ms. Kristy Winser, Sr. PlannerFrom; Nancy Steelman Fax= 765-3136 Pages:2 Phone.'765-1938 Date: October 16, 2009 Re: Sparkling Pointe CC: [] Urgent x For Review ~ Please Comment [3 Please Reply · Description: 1. Letter regarding the installation of parking bumpers date October 16, 2009 ~0/~ 3B~a N~H933£S~S93RH~S LO~g~eZ~e9 8~:0~ S S A T M U E L S & E E L M A N O~ober 16, 2009 Ms. Kristy Winser Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Town of Southold, NY 11971 Re: Sparkling PointeWine~ 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM # 1000-59-10-1 Dear Ms. Winser We would like to inform you and the Planning Board that we have received your letter dated October 14, 2009 and that we are in the process of fulfilling the request for the installation of parking bumpers in the parking areas. As of this date we have been told by the supplier that we should be receiving a partial delivery of the parking bumpers by the end of next week. The remaining bumpers will be delivered the following week and will be installed by the end of the month, If we can answer any questions or provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincere, l~, /Nancy ~elman, R.A. ARCHITECTS"'" '' 25235 MAIN ROAD CU rCHOGDE, NEW YORK 11935 (631) 734-6405 ?AX (63 I) 734-6407 E~/E0 39~d N~H933±S~S93flH~S z0~g>sL~9 B~:0[ SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (631)-765-9015 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel. (631) - 765 - 1560 JAMIE.RICHTER~TOWN.SOUTHOLD.NY.US OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Martin H. Sidor Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Sparkling Point Winery 39750 County Road 48 SCTM #: 1000-59-10-01 October 13, 2009 Dear Mr. Sidor: As per a request from your office, I have completed a final inspection for the above referenced project. This approved site plan was prepared by the office of Samuels and Steelman, Architects, and has been dated August 7, 2007. Please consider the following: The site drainage and required construction items have been completed in a satisfactory manner. If you have any questions regarding this Site Inspection, please contact my office. WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Tuesday, October 13, 2009 4:30 p.m. 4:30 p.m. Site Plans and Subdivisions Locat on: ', 31215 CR 48 Peconic 609' west 0[ H~n~'.~ L:~, ~.~.~!~ .............. ~crip;~i~i i ~i~i~ ~:~d"~i~ P'i~n ~ ~ ~ ~w ~se barn (1,819 s.f.), a new farm crop storage building/barn which will total 1,358 sq. ff., to build an ~ addition to a mason~ building for a farm office (2,674 sq. fi) and to ~ conve~ a 1-sto~ frame house to a farm stand (1 093 s~. ff.) ~ Status Under rev ew Action: Review Lighting Plan Att~hmen~s.~ ~.Time!ine!O~ie~ ~ Locat on: NoAhwest corner of Sound Avenue and Hallock Avenue in Mattituck facilities to an existing farm stand. The overall prope~ is 15.61 acres in the A-C Zon n9 District Status S te P an Review ....... Action: Review comments. A~achmgnts: Staff Rep0~.& Time!ine :~ Location: ~. 39750 C.R. 48, Southold J ~ DeS~i'pfi0n: ~ Y~'i~"~ii~ i~ f~'i'~ ~ new wine~ totaling 11,541 sq. ff. that includes 813 sq. ff. of office, 837 sq. ff. for retail, 4,170 sq. ff. of a tasting room, 3,306 sq. ff. of storage area and ~ 2 415 s~ fl for product on area on a 12.008-acre parcel n the A-C Zone. Status: ~ Request for Fna nspection ~ ~ct ~': .......... ~V ew draft etter of fna nspection resu ts Attachments Draft LeEer :. Lp~.n.~ ......... 9245 Ma n Road East Marion Description: ~i~ ~':i~ati~ ~{ approved neutral blue/gray 110' communications unipole tower with fire/police emergency communication mounted on a cross bar at 30' and includes a 16' x 22' enclosure with a 6' high fen~ on a 3.0583-acre split- zoned parce n the R~0 & HB Zones. Status j Reguest for Fna nspect on Act on Rev ew draft e~er of fina nspect on results. Attachments: i Draft ~ffer S A M U E L S & S T E E L M A N September 30, 2009 Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Town of Southold, NY 11971 Re: Sparkling Pointe Winery 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM Cf 1000-59-10-1 Dear Board Members, Enclosed, please find (3) three stamped sets of the following as built Site Plan drawings dated September 30, 2009 as requested at the Planning Board Work Session on September 28, 2009. Sheet Cf1 - Enlarged Site Plan Sheet #2 - Site Utilities Plan Sheet #3 - Overall Site Plan, Details and Calculations Sheet #4 - Site Landscaping and Lighting Plan Please note the following changes: 1. Extended northeast parking area to provide for 4 additional parking spaces. 2. Relocated storm drainage rings into parking areas and added one additional ring in new parking area. 3. Enlarged dumpster enclosure to provide for additional dumpers to be used for recycling. 4. Removed uncovered rear terrace. Will construct in future. 5. Removed hedge along entry/exit driveway due to future sale of County Property to owner for planting of vines. 6. Removed ground cover in some areas and planted lawn instead. 7. Relocated signs for better visibility. 8. Added flag pole. 9. Relocated waste water system to crushing pad. 10. Changed specification of parking lot pole lighting (see attached). Added one pole light at increased parking area and provided 2 lights at west side of side parking area. 11. Removed planting along new driveway from CR. 48. Suffolk County Department of Public Works would not allo,,~lala~li~g in the right-of-way. 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEWYORK 11935 (631) 734 6405 FAX (631) 734 6407 As per the Planning Board's final Site Plan Approval dated November 20, 2007, it states that a written request will be required for the Planning Board to perform an on-site inspection. This letter will fulfill that request. The Site Plan improvements will be completed during the first part of the week of October 5. The building inspector has completed his final inspection and the contractor has been given the OK to apply for the CO. This application will be submitted this week. We would appreciate if this inspection could be completed as soon as possible so we will be able to receive the CO and open for wine tasting in a couple of weeks. If we can answer any questions or provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Samuels & Steelma~rchitects Nanc~,~ St~lman, R.A. encl. 06-21-09;12~a9 ;Fro~ To:7346407 2/ 3 ACCESS DOOR FIxTURE/ARM STRAICHT COMPARTMENT SOLID RINGS 16-1/2" Dia. SHADE ~%'"'~----~-- FLAT TEMPERED GLASS LENS NIGHTSKY ROOF OPTIC IYPE 3 ~," DiA. STRAIGHT POLE .188 WALL THICKNESS 6061-T6 STRUCTURAL GRADE ALUMINUM POLE WELD~'D FOR SINGLE UNIT CONSTRUCTION HANDHOLE WITH COVER AND ONE OROUND LUG ./2' DIA. ~SE COVER .750 ~ASE FLOOR THICKNESS AND FOURANCHOR BOLTS DOCKET TYPE MEDIUM WAI-FAOE 70 LIGHT SOURCE VOLTAGE ADV~E FUSE F1NISH 8LACK Sep 30 09 O~:3~p 'rani Builders p.1 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY ~;UFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GILBERT ANDERSON, P~.E. LOUIS C:ALDERONE September 25, 2009 John Bertoni Builder. Inc. 1380 Oakwood Drive Southold, NY 11971 RE: Permit #48-236, CR 48, North Rd. (Sparkling Pointe) County Treasurer has been authorized to refund your security in the amount of $6,000.00. To Whom It May Concern: This is to advise you that work under the above-referenced permit has been inspected and found to be completed in a satisfactory manner to this Department. WH:JH:[n cc: Town of Southold Very truly yours, William Hilln'ian, P.E. /dJu~in Hipperling 5Jghway Planning &: Permits WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Monday, September 28, 2009 4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. Site Plans and Subdivisions Location [ 39750 C.R. 48, Southold b~s-criPti~ i 'Tiii~' ~'i~'~i~n'~i~'~:'"~'i~''~'j~:~i~n ~{'~ ~i'~in~'"~ii"~i~i'~"i'~'~' ~'"'"~ wine~ ~ totaling 11,541 sq. ff. that includes 813 sq. ~. of o~ce, 837 sq. ff. for ' retail, 4,170 sq. fl. of a tasting room, 3,306 sq. ff. of storage area and Status ~ Site Plan Review ~!;0J~ ~a~e[ Mattituck Seven Eleven ' SCTM# ~ 1000-142-1-27 Location: n/e corner of Facto~ Avenue & NYS Route 25, Mattituck Description: This site plan is to convert an existing 1,950 sq. ft. gas station/convenience store to a retail store only (convenience store) and add a 685 sq. ft. addition, having a 2,635 sq. ft. building on a 24,829 sq. ff. pa [~! .!!~.. ~h.~ Bu.s!ness ~o.n~.~ Status: New Site Plan Action: ~, Review comments last submission and Engineer comments with the I P~nir~g..Boa..[~: ............................................................................................... ['~'~'~i~: ......... ~ staff Re o~ En ineer Comments Letter from A licant received 8/27/0g ~. L.0cafio~n: (n0.~)..P~i¥.at~ ~[~a~d..off. East End_Road.. F!she[s.!sl~nd Description: Lot line change. This proposal is for lot line changes where no new bu. ~.~.g lots W!!!.. b~...q[~ted~ Statu~; L.Aqti0n; ............................. Accept application for sketch. : ....................................................... Location: i 2350 Wells Road, Peconic, southwest corner ,f Wells Road and State i Route 25 in Peconic b~ip~(~i' ~.~.~:.8~ ~res, [e~!~jgg.!~ ~o re~i~.~j~.!..~gt~.~..~.~.~g[!~.~[~ :Status: Sketch ~ .~9~i.9~.;. 5~q~Pt.~. ~P~ f0[ r~Y.i~;..~d 9~. [ef~[ral ~.~9~n [ ......... ~.0ne ............................................................................. AGENDA Planning/Building Site Plan Coordination Meeting March 10, 2008 1. Laurel Creek greenhouses (adding four to existing two) 2. Kink greenhouse (one) 0 4< 3. Rutkoski farm equipment storage building o~ 4. Macari porch enclosure - c~ ~,~ -~¥~ ~ ~ e\~ '~- 5. Sparklingeoint-letterfromZBA- ~.~4A ~[~ [~.[~ 6. Harbes - storage building and 3 greenhouses 0K ~te'~"02/0?/2B08 16:B2 Town Aan~x IF~t Floo~, North Fork Bank ~4B?~ Main Road (at ¥otmgs Aveau~) Southold, NY 11971 ZON I NC:~3DOFAPF~_~O htqp://~o.tholcltown,n~Ahfork.ne[ BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 53095 Main Road Re, Box ! 179 $outhold, NY 11971-09~9 Tel. (631) 76~-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 B ~...~.g~ar Mail an~d Fax ~a~ Ms, Nancy 8toelraan, A.A. Samuels & Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Sparkling Pointe winery ZBA Condition #5520 Dear Ms. Ste¢lman: On January 28, 2008, we received your letter indicating the status of your site plan application with the Planning Board and the propoae~l red~ign using some of tile existing plants ~md providing additional .plantiag~ to i~erease the length and width of the buffer. S~ee the landscape buffer has act been ro<lUcect ia length or width and will continue to malatai.n and meet the minimum requ/remmt$ of the existing bdffer tl~t has been. in place, thmr~ will be no need to obtai~ further alrgroval fi'om the Board of Appeals, a~d you may proceed to obtain final approval fi~m the P amng Boar Thank, you. Ruth D. Oliva vice Chairwom~m Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.no~thfork.net USPS Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 February 7, 2007 By Regular Mail and Fax Transmission 734-6407 Ms. Nancy Steelman, R.A. Samuels & Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 1 t935 Re: Sparkling Pointe Winery ZBA Condition #5520 Dear Ms. Steelman: On January 28, 2008, we received your letter indicating the status of your site plan application with the Planning Board and the proposed redesign using some of the existing plants and providing additional plantings to increase the length and width of the buffer. Since the landscape buffer has not been reduced in length or width and will continue to maintain and meet the minimum requirements of the existing buffer that has been in place, there will be no need to obtain further approval from the Board of Appeals, and you may proceed to obtain final approval from the Planning Board. Thank you. Ruth D. Oliva Vice Chairwoman SITE PLAN sTATUes' REPORT SITE PLAN TYPE: AMENDED NEW ,/" WITHDRAWN INCOMPLETE LOCATION: ~ f~_~g C,,~ 'F,~ --' ' "-- ,~-/ HAML-~.' ~// IPROJECT USE: AC SCTM# 1000- / ZONE3: TEL# ACRES BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE: PRE-SUBMISSION WRI ! ! I~N REQUEST: PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRfrrEN REQUEST) INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: PRE-WORK SESSION: APPLICATION RECEIVED DATE PAYMENT RECEIVED: FEE AMOUNT: ($300.X ~ SESSION (WITHIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT) APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS REVISED SUBMISSION RECEIVED APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: AMOUNT RECEIVED:$ DATE / / I I I I I / D6 ~NYSDOT~SCWA~SCPD~,SCDPW__ ACTION TYPE: COORDINATED: UNCOORDINATED: -- __ (TYPE ~:__ TYPE2.: UNLISTED: ) STZ~,STBD__,$TC/TB__, JH__, STiST__, STE__,SCDHS__,NYSDEC ~TF~ACO RPS__,NYS~OT__, SCWA~, SCPD__, $CDPW_~ :NEG DEC Y ORN, 6,PPROVALS REQUIRED: REFERRED DATE NOTES APPROVAL DATE NOTES ~RCHiD'C ' URAL REVIEW COMMr'FrEE: ~,~ ~UILDING DEPARTME~CERTIFICATION: . ~7 ~/~ ~/~4 / / :IRE COMMISSIONERS: fOWN ENOlNEER APPROVAL: DEP.OF T~SPO~ATION: DO~, DPW~TO8 ~1~ ~l~l~ 3UFFOLK OOU~ DEPAR~E~ OF P~NNIN~: ~1~1~ ~/ ~1~1~ SUFFOLK OOU~ Oe~ OF H~LTH: PE~IT ~: / / ~P~ONAL ~O~AL$: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: APPEA~: BOARD OF TRUS~E'S: / / / / NYS DEC WET~DS~ DA~PDES _ _ IPLANNING BOARD DECISIONS: DENIED: , APPROVED: CONDITIONAL FINAL: J. / ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: . / / _ I FIELD INSPECTION FOR C/O: / / DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT /. / TOWN ENG / NOTES SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Pla~ N~me and L0catlnn Application Date: 05 / 16 / 2007 Site Plan Name: Sparkling Pointe Winery Suffolk Coanty Tax Map #1000-~. ~. Other SCTM gs: Street Address: 39750 County Rd. 48 Distance lo nearest intersection: MAY 1 8 2007 ' Type of Site Plan: X New Amended If Amended, last approval date: . Residential S,,E~TION B: Ownel~dAgellt Coll~'aet lafOrlllatjon Please list name, mailinx,_a._d_dre.~s, and ]~tone nwnber_~.r~e below: Pro~y&~,'net Thomas and Cynthia Rosicki Street 51 E. Bethpage Rd. City Plainview Home Telphers,.__ Other 516-741-2585 Applicant Same as Above Sleet City.~ State Home Telephone Other Applica. nt's Agent or Representative: Contact P~n(s)*. Nancy Steelman Street Samuels and Steelman Architects City. Cutchogue State.~...N.Y ~Zip~ 11935 Office T~lephone 734-6405 {)tiler *Unt~ otherwise t~uested, eawr~nnndence will be sent onl .... ~' .....~':~ -7% __ ~ , ;z-' -~C~ y ~u rue COnl~t per8oll IlO .,~ Ilere,. Page 1 of 2 10/05/05 SE(TI]ON C: Site Dmta Proud construc~on lype: New Proper~' total acreage or ~uare footage: Modification of Ex~sfng Structure Change of use X ~ac~,sq. ft. Site Plan build-oat acreage or square footage: ] ~ ac/sq, ft. ~Agdcultural Is th~ an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes Property Zoning District(s): AC Building Departanent Nolicc of Disapproval Date ..9_3_~_% .1..7__Q.4 'is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes ~- No X lfyes, have you submitted an application to thc ZBA? Yes __ No Ify~, a~tach a copy oftha applic~ion packeL ,_ S,ee A~.c, hed ZBA Decision Dated: June 3, 2004 Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building wilt have which use. If more then one us~ is proposed p~ building, indicate ,~tuare footage of ~oor area p~r use. Agricultural Building and Vineyard Li~t all existing property uses: List all proposed properly uses: Winery and Vineyard accessory u~s: none Existing 1o! coverage: _ .5 ....... % Proposed lot coverage:_ 1.46 addition 5053 Gross floor area ofexi~g structure(s): 2677 ~sq. fl. Gross floor area of proposed ~,. g of exi~ng spaces: 0 # of proposed spaces: 41 Loading Be~: yeses_X_ No~ i LandscapingDetai~: Existnig landscape coverage: ~_ 86 % Proposed landscape coverage:_ 91 _.% y within 500 of a v, mland area? Yes No ~L i exnlalw,~.= 1, the undersisned, certify that all the above information is m~e. Signature of Preparer: ......... Date: Page 2 o f 2 ,ltO~/05 5/16/07 File View TooIbar Help Double click to O~en a windo~ FOR INTERNAL USE ONLy SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Date: ~ / Project N ame.'~ Project Ad dress L_~°i-~ ~5-7,~ Date Sent: Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000- '~-~ - fo_ Request:C'o~kAo~r,~ ¢1~ ~(%(o r~:,~ Zoning District: (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and suppoding documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted. Initial Determination as to whether use is Initial Determination as to whether site pk Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: ~';'"' P.D. Date Received: ~r / /.~' /0__~ /(2 ) Comments: Final Determination Date: / / Decision: ~pt. Signature of Building Inspector ¢x(-2'2 FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Thomas Rosick~oint LLC) 1 Old Country dl~T4__..~'~ Carle Place, NY 11514 DATE: March 17, 2004 Please take notice that your application dated March 11, 2004 For permit to convert an existing nursery building & office to a winery at Location of property 39750 County Road 48, Southold County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 59 Block 1~0 Lot 1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this conforming 11.5 acre lot in the AC District, is not permitted pursuant to Article III 100-33, A. 4., which states; ~'(c) The winery structures shall be set back a minimum of i 00 feet from a major road." The existing structure is located 67 feet from Count,/Road 48. In addition to a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, the proiect requires approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. CC: file, ZBA, Planning Board Damon Rallis Permit Examiner Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. 473889 59.-10-1 A N~R# DATE TYPEw 20457 3/02/92 PERMIT 25603 3/16/99 PERMIT o/oo/oo o/oo/oo o/oo/oo o/oo/oo o/oo/oo o/oo/oo o/oo/oo o/oo/oo co II OWNER: RAYMOND JA~..AKSCIN USE/DESCRIPTION~ VOID - REMOVED 26701 ACCESSORY Fl=More F7=Permit Detail FS=Co Detail F9=Preco F12=New Swis/Parcel F3=Exit zEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer Lydia A. Tortora Vincent Orlando James Dinizio, Jr. http://southoldtown.northfork.net Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold~ NY 11971-0959 Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2004 ZBA #5520 - SPARKLING POINTE, LLC by THOMAS ROSICKI Property Location: 39750 C.R. 48, Southold; CTM 59-10-1 Zone District: Agricultural-Conservation NC SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect On the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 12-acre lot has 564.88 feet along the south side of County Road 48, a/k/a North Road, in Southold. The properly is improved with agricultural buildings as shown on the December 19, 2002 survey prepared by Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's March 17, 2004, Notice of Disapproval, citing Code Section 100-31A.4 in its denial of a building permit application regarding applicant's plan to convert the existing building use from agriculturel-nursery to agriculturel-winery for the reason that the existing building is less than 100 feet from the front lot line along County Road 48. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 20, 2004, at which time wdtten and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests the continued agriculturel use of an existing building located 67 feet and 80.8 feet at its closest points to the front line along C.R. 48. The building was built in 1999 and has been used as a nursery office and storege areas related to the agriculturel (nursery) use of the land. The applicant is proposing a winery within the building which is a permitted agricultural use in this NC Zone. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grent of the relief requested will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant is not proposing to increase the structure in any way. The appearance of the current plantings that parallel County Road 48 create a visual effect of a much larger setback than the. 67 feet that exists. These plantings and the Page 2 - June 3, 2004 Appl. No. 5520 - Sparking Pointe LLC/Rosicki CTM 59-10-11 at Southold existing building will remain, in place. The plantings will be continuously maintained as a landscape buffer. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant is using the existing structure on this agricultural site, and the structure has been used as an office and storage for the nursery's activities. 3. The variance granted herein is substantial, however, the building will remain in place. The reduction of the current code requirement is 33 feet, for a 67 ft. setback instead of a 100 ft. setback from the front property line. 4. The difficulty was self-created when the applicant acquired the building in a nonconforming location. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this community of single-family residences will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of this relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a different agricultural use (winery), while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly carded, to GRANT the variance as applied for, as shown on the December 19, 2002 survey prepared by Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr., L.S., with the CONDITION that the existing trees and shrubs, be maintained at a minimum average he'ght of 4 as a landscape buffer, as exists, between the building and CR 48. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Orlando, Goehringer, Tor~ora, and Dinizio. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 6/8/04 Approved for Filing CUTCHOGUE, NY 119~ PH. 631-734-6~~ PAY TO THE ORDER OF Town of Southold ~O.K ~..,~ 13883 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 50-791/214 7/25/2007 __ j $ **sO.OD Fift~y and *********************************************************** Town of Southold DOLLARS MEMO ~';~DL--~.~J,~(~N FAR BUILDING PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewdwr or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 ets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or reas, and watezways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a p, ermit hall be kept On the premises available for inspection throdghout the work. ' e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ev~ until the Building Inspector ;sues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of :suance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the roperty have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in wriQng, the extension of the perm/t for an tdifian six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the uilding Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or e ,g~l. ations, fo[ the cons~uction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removgl or demolition as herein described. The )pncant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, holding code,,ai~d regulations, and to admit lthorized inspectors on premiseS and in building for necessary inspections. / / } · / (S/~ure of applicant or name, if a corporation) :ate whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder lme of owner ofpremises~Fra9_~ ~ ~C~'l~:~. ~¢ca/~ki ' 'J (As on the tax roll or iatest deed) applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) filders License No. umbers License No. ~ctricians License No. her Trade's License No. Location of land o,n' which proposed work will be done: House Number Stred Hamlet County TaxMapNo. i000 Section Subdivision ""' _ (Name) Block ]0 Lot Filed Map No. ~ Lot Jl 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy,~proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy A~c~r~ )1~ ~v~l ~J I~-]~r-~a ~ ~q/~'~wwm ~o~ / I' ' b. Intendeduse~doccup~cy (~)lD~o A ~,~.~ 3. Nature of work (oh¢~k ~hi~h applicable): N~w Building. Addition ~ Alteration Repair 'R~moval ~ D~moHtion O~¢r Work Estimated Cost If dwelling, number of dwelling units if garage, number of cars -- Fee (Description) (To be paid on filing this application) Number of dwelling units on each floor 6, If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature, and extent of each type of use. (~}q~z-~ 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front ~.i~ u Rear ~/-' zjt # Depth Height ~D c_~. Number eT Stories / Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front c~? ,_ ..r/~, Depth /,'-~, '-7 t, Height ~Z L~o Number of Stories Rear 7f '5t'' 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front ~ Rear Height ~ Number of Stories ~ Depth 9. Size of lot: Front ~'~,4-. ~,~ ' Rear Depth //'qO. Bt)' 10. Date of Purchase_t~ Name of Former Owner ~:r~ 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated ~ 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES __ NO ~ w'o~r~/,mr~ 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO,~, Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES__ NO 14, Names of Owner of promises Name o f ~chitect ~m ~~ddress~~~o Name of Con~ctor ,~ Ad,ess ~ Phone No. , 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES ' * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES NO * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 (eet or below, must provide topographical dat~a on survey. STATE OF NEW YORK) ,. -, ,,, ~ ~1 SSt oumv ) .,, [K~'~) ~ ~,~ . b~ing d~ly SwOrn} deposes and sa~s tha~' (s)he iS the ,pplicmt ~am~ of infidel si~ing con~ct) hbove named, S)He is ~e (Con,actor, Agent, Co~orate Officer, etc.) ~f said om~ or om~s, and is duly auto,ed to peffo~ or haw p~omed the said work ~d to ~e and file this a~licafion; hat aH smmmenB contained in ~is application ~e ~e to the best of his ~owledge and belief; and ~at ~e work Mll be ~erfo~ed in ~e m~er set fo~ in ~e application filed ~ewith. ;worn to before me thl~ ~~~~ / d yof 200 Nota~P~lic ~AT~lClA ~CMAMD$ . ~ ~' ~Signa~e of Applicant Oualffl~Suffolk Count~ ' '' · - Commissio~pires May FOP,_ NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Thomas Rosick~oint LLC) 1 Old Country ~ Carle Place, NY 11514 DATE: March 17, 2004 Please take notice that your application dated March 11, 2004 For permit to convert an existing nursery building & office to a winery at Location of property 39750 County Road 48, Southold County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 59 Block I__Q0 Lot _1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this conforming 11.5 acre lot in the AC District, is not permitted pursuant to Article III 100-33, A. 4., which states; "(c) The winery structures shall be set back a minimum of i00 feet from a major road." The existing structure is located 67 feet from Count,/Road 48. In addition to a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, the project requires approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. CC:file, mBA, el anning Bo ara ~_~_--~. _~ Damon Rallis Permit Examiner Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above ~:eferenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. ilAR 172004 Southold Town Plannin[ 8oar~ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer Lydia A. Tortora Vincent Orlando James Dinizio, Jr. http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 June 8,2004 Mr. Thomas Rosicki Sparkling Pointe, LLC One Old Country Road Cade Place, NY 11514 Re: Appeal No; 5520 - Setback Variance Dear Mr. Rosicki: Supplementing yesterday's fax transmission, please find enclosed a copy of the variance determination rendered by the Board of Appeals at its June 3, 2004 Meeting. Please be sure to contact the Planning Board (765-1938) and Building Department (765- 1802) regarding further steps in the building and zoning application review prOcess. You may want to furnish an extra copy of the enclosed determination when submitting any other documents that may be requested by both departments in their final reviews. Thankyou. Very truly yours, alski Enclosure Copy of Decision 6/8/04 to: Building Department Planning Board zEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer Lydia A. Tortora Vincent Orlando James Dinizio, Jr. Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold~ NY 11971-0959 Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2004 ZBA #5520 - SPARKLING POINTE, LLC by THOMAS ROSICKI Property Location: 39750 C.R. 48, Southold; CTM 59-10-1 Zone District: Agriculturel-Conservation NC SEQRA DETERMINATION: The ZOning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect On the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 12-acre lot has 564.88 feet along the south side of County Road 48, a/k/a North Road, in Southold. The property is improved with agricultural buildings as shown on the December 19, 2002 survey prepared by Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's Mamh 17, 2004, Notice of Disapproval, citing COde Section 100-31A.4 in its denial of a building permit application regarding applicant's plan to convert the existing building use from agricultural-nursery to agricultural-winery for the reason that the existing building is less than 100 feet from the front lot line along County Road 48. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 20, 2004, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests the continued agricultural use of an existing building located 67 feet and 80.8 feet at its closest points to the front line along C.R. 48. The building was built in 1999 and has been used as a nursery office and storage areas related to the agricultural (nursery) use of the land. The applicant is proposing a winery within the building which is a permitted agricultural use in this NC Zone. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the relief requested will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant is not proposing to increase the structure in any way. The appearance of the current plantings that parallel County Road 48 create a visual effect of a much larger setback than the 67 feet that exists. These plantings and the ' Page 2 - June 3, 2004 Appl. No. 5520 - Sparking Pointe LLC/Rosicki CTM 59-10-11 at Southold existing building will remain, in place. The plantings will be continuously maintained as a landscape buffer. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot I~e achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant is using the existing structure on this agricultural site, and the structure has been used as an office and storage for the nursery's activities. 3. The variance granted herein is substantial, however, the building will remain in place. The reduction of the current code requirement is 33 feet, for a 67 ft. setback instead of a 100 ft. setback from the front property line. 4. The difficulty was self-created when the applicant acquired the building in a nonconforming location. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this community of single-family residences will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of this relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a different agricultural use (winery), while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly carded, to GRANT the variance as applied for, as shown on the December 19, 2002 survey prepared by Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr., ES., with the CONDITION that the existing trees and shrubs, be maintained at a minimum average height of 4' as a landscape buffer, as exists, between the building and CR 48. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than s~,ch uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Orlando, Goehringer, Tortora, and Dinizio. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 6/8/04 Approved for Filing LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Thomas & Cynthia Rosicki Rosicki, Rosicki & Assoc. P.C. 51 E. Bethpage Rd. Plainview, NY 11803 May 7, 2007 We hereby authorize Nancy Steelman of SAMUELS & STEELMAN ARCHITECTS to act as our agent in obtaining all permits required by SOUTHOLD TOWN, SUFFOLK COUNTY and NEW YORK STATE for the construction of a new Winery located at 39750 County Road 48, Southold, New York. Thoma~Ros[cki, Owner Date 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subJective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically export in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a proJect or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3, Patt 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced, Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identi~ the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [ ~--"~ Part 1 r~-"~ Part 2 DPart 3 upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering beth the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: The proJect will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be i~epared.* The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared, *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Sparkling Pointe Winery SCTM 1000-59-10-1 Name of Action Southold Town Plarming Board Name of Lead Agency Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Print or Typo Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency le Officer in Lead Agency website Chairperson 9/11/07 Date Page 1 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefu;ly) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would tdgger a response in column 2. The examples are generarly applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO [] YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per I00 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. [] [] DYes [].o Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. [] [] []Yes Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. [] [] OYes ~'JNo Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. [] [] []Yes [ ]No [] [] OYes I .o Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. [] [] [] I "o Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: I Non¢ Knwon 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) I~l.o I--lYES Specific land forms: [] [] []Yes [] [] DYes r;'l.o [] [] DYes ITINo [] []Yes •No Impact on Water Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) []NO []YES Examples that would appiy to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than t 00 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. [] [] OYes ~.o Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water [] [] body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. [] [] []Yes []No Other impacts: [] [] []Yes []No Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? []NO []YES Examples that wou[d apply to column 2 o A 10 ¥o increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. DYes •No Other impacts: [] [] OYes •No [] [] []Yes •No [] [] OYes ~.o Page 12 of 21 5. Will Proposed Action affect surfaco or groundwater quality or quantity? r--lNo []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a sourco of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excoss of 20,000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: None Known 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change ]Yes []No []Yes r~lNo OYes r~No OYes []No []Yes []No []Yes r'~No []Yes []No •Y~ [].o ]Yes []No []Yes [].o []Yes []No [~]Yes [] No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water mn•fi? E],O []YE~ Examplea that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? [].o []YES Examplse that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount cf land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] OYes DNo [] OYes DEc [] []Yes DNo [] []Yes OEo [] OYes ON• [] •Yea [] OYes ON• [] []Yes •No [] OYes •No [] []Yes 0.o [] OYes r"l.o IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? E]"O OYEs Examplse that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. [] [] DYes DNo Page 14 of 21 Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or hed3icide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: I 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Other impacts: ~P^C, o. ^o.,=u,~.~. ~.D ~SSURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? [].o []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, omhard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change DYes •No []Yes •No [~] Yes r']No DYes r']No DYes r'~No DYes •No ]Yes D']No ]Yes •No DYes •No Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] IMPACT ON AES'n-IE'tlC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual FAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) F~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: [] [] [] [] IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or pareontological importance? [].o DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change []Yes []No ]Yes [] No ]Yes DNo DYes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes •No Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? [] NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Otherimpacts: [] [] [] IMPACT ON CR~ICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? []NO DYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change DYes []No ]Yes •No []Yes []No []Ye, I--1No DYes •No •Yea •No []Ye, •No []Yes D-lYes •No I Page 17 of 21 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15, Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: I NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? E].o []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural bsrders that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: Page 18 of 21 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] DYes ~.o [] OYes •No [] DYes r-IN• [] []Yes •No [] OYes •No [] []Yes ON• [] Dyes ~.o [] DYes ON• [] Dyes [] OYes ON• [] DYes •No 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBUC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: IMPACT O~ ORO~IH .,~lD CI'~R~C'ffiR OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? [].o []~s Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] OYes D.o [] Dyes ~.o [] DYes •No [] []Yes ~.o [] DYes ON• [] DYes ~.o [] []Yes •No [] DYes ~.o [] OYes ~.o [] OYes D"o [] DYes Page 19 of 21 Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: I 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? [].o DYEs 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] L==~ Yes []No [] [] I--lYes D.o [] [] []Yes •No If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 617.20 Appendix A State Environme/~tal Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF le designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The furl EAF is intended to provide e method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been ordedy, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of Information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible imPacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance aa to whether an impact ia likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it ia a potenfially-large impact The form also identifies whether an impact can be mifigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR ~ USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions DB. Identify the Por~on~ of FAF completed for this project: [] Part1 [] Part2 []Pert3 Upon review of the information recorded on this FAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting Inforrnetlon, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it ia reasonably determined by the lead agency that: DA. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore · negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have e significant effect on the environment, there will not be e significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described In PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative deblsretlon will be prepared." The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency · Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) webaita Date Page I of 2'1 Sparkling Pointe Winery 39750 County Road 48 ancySt Ima Sa I &St ' ~ ~&~r,~r ee n, mue s eelmanN Architects ~ 25235 Main Road at~,t~ Cutchogue z~ c,~, 11935 u~,~o~Of~.r~t),, Thom nd Cynthia Rosicki ~*~*~ 516-741-2585 Renovations and Additions to an existing agricultural building for the purpose of wine making and tasting, Installation of new parking and loading area with drainage; new sanitary and waste water systems. Page 2 (~1~ 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1, Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial D Forest ~Agricu)tu!e [] Other ~ Residential (suburban) [] Rural {non-farm) Total acreage of project area: ~...~acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) PRESENTLY Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres Water Surface Area -" acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill} _~acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces ~..~__acres Other (Indicate type} acres AFTER COMPLETION /./~ acres 3. What is predominant soil type[s) on project site7 a. Soil drainaga: J~Well drained ~__~_% of site [] Moderately well drained % of site. ~Poorly drained __% of site b. If any agricultural land is involyed, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System?/,-~, ~"~J~ acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4, Ars there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~ Yes [] No a, What is depth to bedrock (in feet) Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: r~0.10% ~._% •lO- 15%__% [~ 1§% or greater__% 6. Is project substantiall~ontiguous t~.~ contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LJ Yes ~ No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register Of National Naturat Landmarks;' [] Yes J~lNo 8. Whet is the depth of the water table7 lin feet) ~},-'~-/I-4~r~.~n 21I 9. is site located over a primary, principal, or sole sourqe aquifer? DYes I~ No 10. Do hunting, fishing or cheil fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [] Yes ~No Page 3 of 21 11, Does project'site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? I lYes J::~No According to: Identif~ each species: I 1 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? {i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? DYes ~No DescHbe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes []No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site ir/(~'l-ude scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes 1S. Stroems within or contiguous to proJeot eroe: 16, a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: No b. Size {in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities7 ~ Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? OYes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DNo []Yes DNo 1 S. Is the site located in an~agriculturel district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~x~,)IYes r~No 19. IS the site located in or substantially contiguous to e Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 r=~ Yes []No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B, Project Description r~Yes ,~No Physical dimensions and scala of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: ~ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: · ~ acres initially; , ~t'~ acres ultimately. C. Project acreage tO remain undeveloped: .//. ~7 acres. d. Length of project, in mi/es: ~. ~ (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. ~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: ~ ~ ~' {upon~completion of project}? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially '"'" Ultimately "' i. Dimensions {in feet} of largest proposed structure: ~ ~.- # height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? _~'~-)/~) 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? ~ 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed []Yes CNo [~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [] No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? _ width; _Z~..~..~_-elength. ft. tons/cubic yards. acres, Page 5 of 21 ~ §. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes ~, No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: ~ month;, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated __ (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ year. d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases;) [] Yes [] No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes [] No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities;' ~ Yes [] No if yes, explain: / / 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~ Yes ~ No 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [] Yes J~No If yes, explain: 15. is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [] Yes ~,No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? ~/~, tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No Type~ d. any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or irate a sanitary landfill? Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? vl~Yes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ~_~ tons/month, b. If yes, what is the anticipated sit~ life? J years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes DNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors {more than one hour per day)? DYes ~]No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels7 DYes 21 .-~VVill project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [] No ///If yes, indicate type(s) 22, If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23, Total anticipated water usage per day ~'~O~ gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federa~ funding? DYes If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board DYes [] No Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes [] No City, Town Zoning 8oard_.~ ~Yes N No city, Co.n []Yes [] No Other LoCal Agencies r~Yes [] No State Agencies .~.Yes [] No Federal Agencies [] Yes ~No Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? []Yes [] No If Yes, indicate decision required: ' [] Zoning amendment [] Z [] New/revision of master plan J~Site plan ,:: [] SpeEial use permit [] Resource management plan [] Subdivision ]Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning7 4-. What is the proposed zoning of the site7 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? []Yes What are tho predominant land usela) end zoning claa$1floefions Within e ~i mile radiue o~/propoaed action? DNo 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding lend uses with a Y~ mile? dyes 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of lend, how many lots are proposed? ----, DNa a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 ~ Tm~ Archit ce~;gent - ' 6/11¢07 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY MAILING ADDRESS.?~ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chair Town of Southold Planning Board Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator ~N Principal Planner September 6, 2007 Proposed Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Winery 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zoning District AC This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totahng 11.541 sq. fi. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retaiI, 4, i70 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. fi. of storage area and 2,415 sq. ft. of production area on a 12.088-acre parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold. SCTM#1000-59-10-1. The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department as well as the records available to me, it is my determination that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP provided that the Planning Board consider the following policy standards in site design: Policy Standards 3.1 Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. Minimize introduction of structural design components (including utility lines, lighting, signage and fencing) which would be discordant with existing natural scenic components and character. C. Screen components of development which detract from visual quality. Use appropriate siting, scales, forms, and materials to ensure that structures are compatible with and add interest to existing scenic components. Preserve existing vegetation and establish new indigenous vegetation to enhance scenic quality: 1. Preserve existing vegetation which contributes to the scenic quality of the landscape. 2. Allow for selective clearing of vegetation to provide public views without impairing values associated with the affected vegetation. 3. Restore historic or important designed landscapes to preserve intended or designed aesthetic values. 4. Restore or add indigenous vegetative cover that presents a natural appearance It is further recommended that the following best management practice be applied to further Policy 5, "Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold" and protect and improve the water quality and supply in the area: 1. The parking areas are constructed of pervious materials. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Planning Board shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Cc: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer File Town of Southold Edited by Foxit PDF Copyright (c) by Foxit SoRware Company, 2004 For Evaluation Only. LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessmem is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exert, pt actions incluch'ng Building Perraits and other min~sterJal permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the L~__,,~i~ licy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consister~[~' pblicy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following Pl~ces: onl~et at the T6wn of SoUthold, s website ($outholdtown.northfork.net), the bard of an local libraries and the Town Clerk s office. B. DESCRHrFION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM ooo _ ' ( - The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): To. Board ~ PlanaiogDep,. [] BoildingDept. [] Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital [] construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) [] (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: New winery Edited by Foxit PDF ~'or Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 For Evaluation Only, Location o£action: 39750 CR48, SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 Site acreage: 526,560 SQ. FT. = 12.088 AC ])resent land use: FARM / STORAGE Present zoning classification: A-C If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: SAMUELS AND STEELMAN ARCHITECTS (b) Mealing address: 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE NY 11935 (c) Telephone number: Area Code (). (631) 734 6405 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [] No ~ If yes, which state or federal agency?. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section llI- Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ~'~Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable NON WATERFRONT SITE, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ALONG AN AGRICULTURAL CORIDOR (NORTH ROAD) AND THE INTENDED USE OF THE PROPERTY IS A WINERY WHICH IS AGRICULTURAL IN NATURE AND PRESERVES THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY AS OPEN SPACE IN THE FORM OF A VINEYARD THERE ARE OTHER WINERIES ALONG THE SAME ROAD TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological r~,~,ources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section HI- Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No ~-~ Not Applicable Edited by Foxit PDF E~ Copyright (c) by Foxit SofoNare Company, 2004 For Evaluation OnLy. Attach additional sh~ts if n~cossary Policy 3. Enbnnee visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH- Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ~-~ Yes ~-~ No [] Not Applicable THE NEW WINERY IS A ONE STORY ABOVE GRADE STRUCTURE WITH A BASEMENT THAT CONCENTRATES THE BUILDING VOLUME IN A CENTRAL LOCATION, THUS PRESERVING OPEN SPACE. ALL UTILITARIAN AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED WITH PRIVACY FENCING AND EVERGREEN SCREENING. THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE OF THE BUILDING MATCHES OTHER ARCHITECTURAL STYLES IN THE AREA. Attach additional sheets if n~cessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section Ill - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable ALL RAINWATER RUNOFF ON DEVELOPED PORTIONS OF THE SITE, WILL BE RETAINED ON SITE WITH THE USE OF UNDERGROUND DRYWELLS. Attach additional sheets if n~.essary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southoid. See LWRP Section m - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria [] [] No []Not Applicable Yes RT ONS OF THE SITE, WILL BE RETAINED ON SITE WITH THE USE ALL RAINWATER RUNOFF ON DEVELOPED PO OF UNDERGROUND DRYWELLS. A SANITARY SYSTEM FOR THE WINERY WILL MEET CURRENT SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH SEVICES STANDARDS FOR SANITARY WASTE WATER. THE PROPERTY IS SERVED WITH PUBLIC WATER FROM SUF__FOLK COUNTY. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southoid ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and W'fldlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section HI - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~-~ No [] Not Applicable NON WATERFRONT SITE NO DEVELOPMENT WILL TAKE PLACE IN THE "PROTECTED" OR NATURAL INDIGINOUS ENVIRONMENT Edited by Foxit PDF Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 For Evaluation Only. Attach additional sh~ts if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southoid. See LWRP Section IH- Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. ~ Yes [] No [] Not Applicable THE WINERY WILL NOT ADD POLLUTANTS INTO THE AIR. ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MEET THE FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR AIR POLUTION DISCHARGE. THE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS OF THE WINERY WILL MEET THE FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR AIR POLLUTION DISCHARGE Attach additional sheets it'necessary Policy 8. Minlml~e environmental degradation in Town of Southoid from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section IH- Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [--~ No [] Not Applicable RECYCLING CENTER, ALL WASTEWATER "SANITARY" WILL SE DISCHARGED INTO AN APPROVED SCDHS SANITARY SYSTEM PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southoid. See LWRP Section IH- Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. No [] NotApplic.ble NON WATERFRONT SITE Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new wa~r-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section IH- Policies; Pages 47 through ~6 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable NON WATERFRONT SITE Edited by Foxit PDF Copyright (c) by Foxit Software Company, 2004 For Evaluation Only. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section m- Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ['~ Yes [] No ~ Not Applicable NON WATERFRONT SITE Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section l~ - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes ~-] No [] Not Applicable THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ALONG AN AGRICULTURAL CORIDOR (NORTH ROAD) AND THE INTENDED USE Of THE PROPERTY IS A WINERY WHICH IS AGRICULTURAL IN NATURE THE WINERY PRESERVES THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY AS OPEN SPACE IN THE FORM OF A VINEYARD THERE ARE OTHER WINERIES ALONG THE SAME ROAD TO THE WEST OF THE PROPERTY Attach additional sheets ff necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section l~- Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ~'~ Yes [] No ~-~ Not Applicable THE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE USING EQUIPMENT APPROVED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR ENERGY USAGE. THE WINERY WILL MEET FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR CONSERVING ENERGY "ENERGY STAR PROGRAM "AND WILL USE "NEW YORK STATE ENERGY CONSERVATION AND CONSTRUCTION CODE" FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE WINERY PREPARED Created on 5/25/05 11:20 AM 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full E~F is designed to help applicants and agencie~etermine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Componente: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR ~ USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part1 [] Part2 DPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this FAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, end considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one w~Jch will ~t have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative·~ee~'~' ~aretl°ni~" ~.wi I be prepared. ~ DB. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not I~e a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the m.tlgatlon measures describ~l~ J~?.~RT 3 have ~eer~ ~'e~~, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ~~!.~,i~ ?' ~' '~ - ~ [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important ,mpact~i~l~et',ay h,¥~a~a s~g~!fi~imp,~ On the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ? ~ \ d ~ ~' \ *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only va d for Un sted Act one ~ ~ - Name of Action ~ ~ Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1-PROJECT INFORMA~N P~epared by Project Sponsor Sparkling Pointe Winery 39750 County Road 48 ~ar~,or~.~s~r~ Nancy Steelman, Samuels & Steelman Architects A~d~s~ 25235 Main Road c~o Cutchogue ................. ~ NY ~z~pc,~e 11935 N~C~n~} Thom~ and Cynthia RosioRi ~s~5~ E. Bethpa~e Road ~m P}a~9view _ s~_ NY ~ ~.¢.~ess ~e~r~ 516-741-2585 Renovations and Additions to an existing agricultural building for the purpose of wine making and tasting. Installation of new parking and loading area with drainage; new sanitary and waste water systems. Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. D orest D^grieu,ture DOther Residential (suburban) [] Rural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) .~ Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: DWell drained __ % of site DPoorly drained % of site PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres acres acres D Moderately well drained __% of site. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~ Yes ~ No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: D0-10%__% D10- 15% % . D 15% or greater % Is project substantiall~ontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LU Yes ~ No DYes DNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9, Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole sourqe aquifer? DYes [] No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shelt fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~ Yes ~No Page 3 of 21 Does project'site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? According to: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? DYes DNo Describe: DYes DNo 13. Is the project site presently used by t~e community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes DNo If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site [~blude scenic views known to be important to the community? 1 5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: DYes Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? DYes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to altow connection? DNo DTM DNo 18. is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 26-AA, Section 303 and 3047 r'~Yes r-]No 19. Js the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 r~Yes r'~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). r=] Yes [] No a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped; acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. __ f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: acres. acres ultimately. proposed (upon~completion of project)? Multiple Family Condominium height; width; length j. Linear feet of frontage along a pubric thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes DNo DN/A a. if yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? I I b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation;' []Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [] No 4. How mar~y acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site7 acres. Page 5 of 21 ~ §. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Elves E'JNo 0. If sinoIs phass project: .Anticipated pariod of construction: __ months, lin¢luding demolition} 7. If multi-phased: a. lotal number of pha~os anticipaI*d ~ {numbar~ b. ~nticipat~d date of comm*ncom~nt pha~ 1: ~ month ~ g~ar, {includin~ demolition} c. ~pproximaIo completion date of final phase: ~ momh ~ g~ar. d. I~ pha~o 1 ~uacfionall~ d~pondont sa ~ub~oqu~nt phasos~ ~ Yes ~ ~o ~. Will bla*fin~ oocur durin~ conatruction~ ~ Yo~ ~ ~o O. ~umbor of ~ob8 ~onoratod: durin~ construction after proioct i~ tomcats 10. ~umb~r of lob~ oliminat~d b~ thi~ praiser ~ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities~ ~ Yes ~ No If yes, explain: / / 12. Is suvaco liquid waste disposal involved? ~ Yes ~ No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industdal, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsudace liquid waste disposal involved7 ~ Yes ~ No Type 14. Will su~ace area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~ Yes ~ No If yes, explain: 15. ts project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? []Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month7 __ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used7 [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill7 [] Yes B No Page 6 of 21 ~ e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes L-----]No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated sit_e life? __ years. 18, Will project use herbicides or pesticides;' E~Yes 19. Will project routinely produce odors {more than one hour per day)? DYes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? r~Yes []No 21.,,Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes ~ No ~' If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~ Yes [] No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board [] Yes [] No Type Submittal I~ate City, Town, Village Planning Beard r~Yas [] No City, Town Zoning Board OYes [] No City, County Health Department [] Yes [] No Other Local Agencies ~Yes [] No Other Regional A~ncies [] Yes [] No State Agencies ~Yes [] NO Federal Agencies []Yes []No C. Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? r~Yes if Yes, indicate decision required: .~ r~ zoning amendment r~site plan ,: D Zoning variance D Spe6ial use permit r~ New/revision of master plan D Resource management plan D Subdivision D Other Page 8 of 21 3o What is the zoning classification(s) of the site;' What is the maximum potential dev~J~ment ~ ~ Si(~ J¢de~/eioped as permitted by the present zoning! 4-. What is the proposed zoning of the site? What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [] Yes [] I~1o What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications Within a ~A mile radius o~/proposed action? Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y~ mile7 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 , P~8e lOof 2~ 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable, it is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Pert 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Pert 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially4erge impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not ths impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATI/('~N OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions ,d..ti,y ,b. ,o ons o, comp, d ,or ,h,s pro, ect= DPs.' DPo. 2 . Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting inform~u~(~n, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: DA. DC. / The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not'have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be p~epared.* The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore s positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Nam~ of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer {If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Prpvide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. !! Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) State ~J y ZipCode 1~/5'/~r~ Name of Owner (if different) Address City / PO Business Telephone State Zip Code Description of Action: Page 2 of 21 Piease Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial []Forest ~Agriculture []Other N Residential {suburban) [] Rural {non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: J~..D<~s acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural {Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other {Indicate type) / / 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: /[~Well drained (~ O% of site Poorly drained % of site PRESENTLY ~/~ acres i~.OS ~ acres /~J~ acres j~J/~' acres r'-I Moderately well drained __ AFTER COMPLETION ~/o[ acres ! 3,. 0 ~ acres % of site. b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? i-3'-I)_~_~ acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [] Yes ~ No a. What is depth to bedrock ~ ~ (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~O-lO%_.4~L% r~1o-1§% % . r~15% or greater 6. Is project substantiall~ontiguous ti~k~ontain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LJ Yes ~[~ No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? ;;~.~) t (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [] Yes [:~No Page 3 of 21 ]Yes acres acres / / Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? . DYes i. 1 According to: I Identify each species: 12. Are there eny unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? Describe: 13. Is the project site pr. esently.~Jsed by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? r-]Yes No 5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: ~/ a. Name of Stream end name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size (in acree): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~DNo 18, Is the site located i an,,~_aj~ultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA, Section 303 and 304? [~es DNo Is the site located in or substantially contiguous 19. and 6 NYCRR 617? [] Yes ~'~¥No to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes7 · B. Project Deacrlption ]Yes 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: ~.O~ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ~J J~' Oacres initially; 0 pA acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: .k) I~ acres. d. Length o~ project, in miles: ~ ~ {if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indict, re percent of expansion proposed. ~,~ f. Number of off-street parking spa~s existing I ~ ; proposed 3C) g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)7 h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: ~%~ One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) wilt be removed from the site? Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes DNo ~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? ft. tons/cubic yards. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes [] No How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. Page 5 of 21 Wil~ any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation Me removed by this project? 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: ~J.~ months, (including demolition} 7. If multi-phased: ~J ~, a. Total number of phases anticipated ~ (number} b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: ~ month --. year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: ~ month ~ year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes [] No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes [] No fl k 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ ~ ; after project is complet_e 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~ ~. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DYes ~o If yes, explain: / surface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes /~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, otc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes ~No Type 14. Will surfaco area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [] Yes If yes, explain: I,, 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes [] No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes ~o a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ~ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated sit~ life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~Yes DNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes~o 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes~ 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yestj~o If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~ gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day, ~'""~l)ons/d~. ~) ¥;,~ ~t"Y~.~..~'~"t,1 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? D Yes ~No 7 If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board L.'~ Yee [] NO Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board ~es [] No City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department [] Yes ['~ No Other Local Agencies [] Yes [] No Other Regional Agencies I--l a, ~.o :/ State Agencies C.Yes [] No Federal Agencies [~ Yes [] No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [~es [] No If Yes, indicate decision required: [] Zoning amendment '~oning variance [] New/revision of master plan D Site plan [] Special use permit [] Resource management plan D Subdivision D Other Page 8 of 21 What is the zoning classification(s) of the site;' What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site;' Whet is tho maximum potentiel deva~cpment o~ tho site if developad ea ~ermitte~ ~¥ the proposed ~onin~? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? What are the pradominant land use{s} an¢ zoning claasificetions Within a ~i mile rediu$ of propoaod action? ./ 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y4 mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? ~ ~ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? [] No Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes ~o 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? r-koe s. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand;) H Yes ~o HYes •.o 1 2, Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. [. D. Informational Details / Attach any edciitional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts /hssociated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ~ Signature __~ Title If the aotlon Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responelblfity of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer Is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of Impaots and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State e nd for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation In Part 3. The Impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illuslrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of Impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the Importance of each question. In Identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any Impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yea to a question then-check the appropriate box(column I or 2)to indicate the potential size of the Impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2, If Impact will occur but threshold Is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that It is also necessarily sllinlfloanL Any la,ge Impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine signlticanco. Identifying an Impact In column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A Ne response Indicates that such a reduction Is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. / Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage, Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (La., rock or soil) per year. I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change D [] I-I . r-IH• [] [] DYes DNo [] [] OYes r"lHo [] [] DY. I'"lNo [] [] []Yes r-lEo [] [] OYes r"l.o Page 11 of 21 Construction or expansion of a santary landt~ll. Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: I Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (I.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) I,'1.° I-I~S Spactfic lend forms: Impact on Watar 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) r'~o r']YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · ~velopable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channf~l of a protected stream. / Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other Impacts: I Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? r~NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% Increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] D' [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change r~Yes r~No r~Yes r~No r-ly. r"lNo I r~yes r"lNo r"lYes r'=lNo DY- r'~No DYes r~No r"lYes r'lNo I-I~es I DYes r==~ No OYes r'lNo r'l~esI"l.o Page 12 of 21 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposed Action will advemely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change OYes DNa I-lyes r"l,a I-IY- I-IY- I'-I,o DY.. I-'1,o []Yes 1'3,o I"lv. I-'1,o DYes I-I,o Page 13 of 21 Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water run•fl? r"l.o Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other Impacts: I Will Proposed Action affect air quality? 121"o I"l~s ExampIs$ thst would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will Induce 1,000 or more Yehi¢lo trips in glYen hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an Increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an Increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: I IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? I--I.o r'-i~s Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of•ne or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change DYes •No [~]Yes r'lNo I-lYes r'Iyes I"l.o ]Yes r'iNo r'~Yes []No r'lyes []Yes r'l.o DY. []No []Yes OYes []No DYes r"lNo Page 14 of 21 Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: I 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threataned or non- endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires t;~e removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Other Impacts: I / IMPACT O~N AGRICUL?UR/tJ. LAND RESOURCr~s 10. Will Proposed A~tion affect agricultural land resources? []NO //F~YES Examples that'would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cress or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located In an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] 2 Potantlal Large Impact [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mlfigated by Project Change DY" NNo DY,= r'~No ]Yes r~No DYes ~No r-~ Yes r~No Dyes r"lNo [~] Yes []No []Yes []Yes Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runo~. Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change [] DY- r"l No [] DYes DNo IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) •NO r-I,~s ~xamplea that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or prolact eomponecte obviously different from or In eharp contrast to current eurroundlng land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their en~pyment of the aesthetic qualifies of that resource. / Proje~ components that will result In the elimination or sip ~.il~cant"~ screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: I IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? I"lNO r-i~s Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory, [] [] [] [] [] [] [] DYes I"1.o [] OYes O.o [] DYes r'lEo [] DY- ON• [] DYes ON• [] DYes I"1.o [] Dyes ON• Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Exaroples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity, A major reduction of a~ open space important to the community, Other impacts: IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Exaroplaa that would apply to coluron 2 Proposed ^ction to locate within the CEA'/ Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can impact Be Mitigated by Project Change []Y. I-I,o I ]Yes r~No DYes r'~No OYes 12].o r-'lYes r'lNo []~. I"1.o r'l~,, r"l.o Page 17 of 21 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? []NO [] Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result In major traffic problems. Other Impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the Community's sources of fuel or energy supply? •NO C]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the uae of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? •NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day), Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other Impacts: Page 18 of 21 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 3 Potential Can impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change [] r'1¥~ I--IN• [] DY-r~No [] DY-123.o [] 7 OYes ON• / [] ~./ C]Yes C]No [] nyes[].o [] DY- r'lEo [] I--Iy. r-lEo [] I-lYes r'lEo [] OYes r'lEo [] OYes r"l No 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBUC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: IM~PACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER ., / OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOO / 19. Will Propo'~ed Action affect the character of the existing community? ON• []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expen(;;tures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] DYes ON• [] OYes .ON• [] DY.. r'l,o [] Oyes I--I.o [] Dyes I--I,o I [] I-lyes E].o [] OYes [] []yes I--I.o [] OYes I--!.o [] OYes •No [] DYas D"o Page 19 of 21 Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment, Other impacts: I 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment Impacts? I"1.o I'"ly~s 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes r~No [] [] •y~ [] [] OYes If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed ~.0 Part 3 / Page 20 of 21 Part 3. EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared If one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the Impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (if you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide it it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is Important. To answer the question of importance, consider: The probability of the impact occurring The duration of the impact Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value Whether the impact can or will be controlled The regional consequence of the impact Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 D. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS AND WATER SUPPLY NARRATIVE REQUEST ~ttach a,ny add. itional i.n.fo.rma.t!pn as may be n~eed,ed to q[arify your, project. If there are or may be any verse impacts assocmtea wi,re, your proposat, p~ease mscuss sucn impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid [hem. 1. Provide explanation of existing site use, occupancy, structures, sani~ry flow, water use; compare to proposed use, occupancy, struelures, sanitary flow, water use ggv~o~ Iq t-~ ¢~tW ~ ~ 2. Indicate the source o£wat~r supply, nearest public water main, nearest public well field, and adjacent private wells (if known). ~l~ki V'~ ~eA] t:~ ~ ~ e~ 3. If publi*c water supply is proposed, indicate the ability of th~ water utility to provide water supply to the project. Provide letter of water availability or detailed explanation of status of review by water utility. ~r' 4. If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on-site water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval' or detailed explanation of status of review by agency. T~ b~. r,.,~,x~ [e~d 5.. Indicate proposed water conservation measures that will mitigate for unavoidable adverse impaeB (If any). Conservation measures should~, include, but not be limited to: bj a. The use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping. b. The p~'eservation of existing native vegetative buffers. c. The conservation ofexisfing open space areas. d. The implementation of "natural' stormwater management practices (~rass swales, filter s~ips, created wetlands, etc...). / E. VERIFICATION I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ^pplioant/Sponsor ame X . If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, Form before proceeding with this assessment. complete the Coast[I Assessment ~" ~PLA~I~G BOARD M~S · BENNETT ORLOWSK~R.~ Chairman RICHARD CAGGL~O WILLIAM J. CREME~ KENNETH L. EDWARDs M~RTIN II. SIDOR _~_.New ~Change ~1= Use ~Re-use _ Extension _ Revision of Approved Site Plan' Name of= Business or SILe: SCTM#: LocaLIon: Address: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE P.O. Box.1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 7(35-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 Date Received _ Date Completed Filing Fee TOWAI OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR CONSIDEP. A ' Name of APplicant: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: Agent or Person responsible for application: Address: Telephone: Site plans prepared by: License No. 'Address: ,~Telephone: PHONE CALL) .... '~TU~N~-- ~ ' ~' ~ --~ ~ I W~LC~ / -- / ~ I I-WAN~STO Pa0e 2 Planning Board Site Plan Apl APPLICAN~ AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNIY OF SUFFOLK being duly sworn, deposes and says that: he resides at In the slate of New York, and that he Is the owner of the above property, or that he Is me (Title) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which Is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown onthe Site Plan; that the tlUe to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been dearly esLabllshed and Is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without ne approval of= the Planning Board; and that the acQJal physical Improvements will be Installed In strict ~iccordance With the plans submlLted. Signed (Partner or Corporate officer and TIUe) Sworn to me this (Notary Public) 7oo /' GINA MARIE EANNUCCi NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New Yori~ No. 01EA5075334 Qualified in Nassau Ccunty Commission Expires March Planning Board Site Plan A ~ Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet)- $~.G, 5'{,0 .~ .-~-~. Zoning District Existing Use of Site W~ "Proposed Uses on Site. S~ow all uses propo~edand existing. Indicate which bulldlng will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, Indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. I 3, (~¢l ~. Gross Floor Area of F. xlstlng Structure(s) ~ N'/~' Gross Floor Area of P~oposed StructUre(s) O. ~ Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) ., 1.0 Percent of Lot for Palldng (whereappllcable)~o~l, ~xir~.~l. ~.~$0~..~1C..¢~'~-c~t~' . NIA Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) ~.1~ ~[ .¢~~ ~G~.~ ~ 0.~ Has applicant been granted a vadance anCoT sPecial excepUon by ~ Board of ~peals - Case ~ & date Board of T~stees -'Case ~ & date ' NY S~te Depa~ent of Environmental Conse~aUon - Case ~ & date Suffolk CounW DepaKment Health 5e~lces - Casa ~ & dale I Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision ExplraUon Date Other WIll any toxic or hazardous mateflals as defined by the Suffolk Counb/Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permll~ been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit Issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCT/ON) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PI-ANN/NO BOARD. VIOLATORS APE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. Site Plan Applications Public Hearings Under the current site plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the. Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval, The applicant shall now have the following options: 1. To follow the established procedure, or To have the planning Board schedule and I~old a public hearing on the site plan application and'have the'Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional ~ite plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Departn~ent approval subject to the following conditions: The applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning'Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change Is material to any of the Issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review Its conditional approval. The applicant agrees not to object to a new public, hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plansj The applicant is aware of the terms of thisapprOval and.Certifies to these terms by his/her signature below. SCTM#: 1000- Applicant Date ROSICK1, ROSICK! & ASSOCDITES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mai# Office: One Old Country Road, Suite 200 Carle Place, New York 11514 Telephone (516) 741-2585 Facsimile ($16) 741-4748 trosicM~rosickLcom March 22, 2004 Southold Town Planning Board Town ttall 53095 Rt 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RECEIVED MAR 2 6 2.004 To Whom It May Concern: I Thomas P. Rosicki, owner of the property at SCTM# 1000-059-10-001 in Southold, NY, hereby authorize Stephen D. Mudd to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved in the variance process wi~h the Southold Planning Board. Signature.'~/~,-~'' Sworn before me this ~3 dayof ot stamp) GINA MARIE/ANNUCCI NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 01EA5075334 Qualified in Nassau County Co.mmission Expires M&rch 31, March 25, 2004 Variance Submission for SCTM# 1000-059-10-001 - Fact Sheet Attachment Owners Name: Property Address: Thomas P. Rosicki (Sparkling Pointe, LLC) 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 Contact: Address: Stephen D. Mudd 39005 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 631-765-1248 Phone 631-765-9495 Fax Lot Size: Building Size: 12.088 acres, 526,560 sq. ft. 2,689 sq. ft. total - breakout per space listed below Three Business Uses Combined per 100.91 for A-C zoning parking requirements: Office/Business: Retail Store or Shop: Warehouse/Storage: Total Parking Req'd: Min. Parking Stalls Req'd: 2 for 150 sq.ft. Min. Parking Stalls Req'd: 3 or 573 sq.ft. Min. Parking Stalls Req'd: 2 For 1,969 sq.ft. 7 Stalls minimum, one of which must meet ADA Act Standards Current Gravel Pkg.: Approximately 2,625 sq. ft., which is approximately 0.5% of total lot size. Proposed Main Parking Area: Approximately 6,060 sq. ft.. The current parking combined with the additional proposed parking will be comprised of the following: Twenty (20) parking stalls ten feet (10') wide by twenty feet (20') long, and includes one (1) eight foot (8') wide by twenty (20') foot long ADA stall with a five foot (5') wide by twenty foot (20') long unloading area. This stall meets the Federal ADA Act requirements that specify the need for one (1) ADA parking stall for parking lots that have between one (1) and twenty-five (25) stalls. The ADA stall will be the closest stall to the office/retail building for required ease of access. The parking area and all stalls will be covered in gravel with spots being indicated by concrete park stops, except for the ADA stall and unloading area which will be black top pavement. The parking area already has one catch basin in place, and will have drainage for the expanded parking area bemuse of slope of the lot toward the southeastern part of the lot. This is in the opposite direction of County Road 48, so there will be no soil runoff to the mad. Proposed Overflow Parking Area: Approximately 4,000 sq. fi. The proposed overflow parking area will comprised of the following: Twelve (12) parking stalls ten feet (10') wide by twenty feet (20') long. Buffers: The north side of the parking area, that parallels County Road 48, has assorted plantings of trees and shrubs with an average height of five feet (5') by an average width of four feet (4') already in place. This buffer seems to meet current zoning requirements for those properties located across County Road 48. The eastern side of the parking area has a treeline composed of six foot (6') Juniper trees already in place. This buffer seems to meet the current zoning requirements for those properties that border that side and rear property lines. SIGN MON ?Rofos~D b BLIP. OFRCE o GRAVEL pARKING F"~/~ /_- Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: 07/10/07 * * * RECEIPT * * * Receipt'8: 13804 Transaction(s): 1 1 Application Fees Reference Subtotal 59-10-1 $1,215.50 Check~: 13804 Total Paid: $1,215.50 JUL 10 2007 Name: Sparkling, Pointe L L C S C T M # 59-10-1 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID: 59-10-1 PLANNING BOARD MF_~IBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (car. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk From: Planning Department Date: July 6, 2007 Re: Checks Enclosed herewith is/are the check(s) listed. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Name & Type Tax Map Amount bate of # Check Peconic Landing 5P 35-1-25 $500 app fee 5/16/07 Sparkling Pointe 59-to-! $1,215.50 6/8/07 Vineyards 5P LR encs. Date: 06/16/04 Transaction(s): Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * Application Fees Check#: 13917 Total Paid: 13917 Subtotal · $434.60 $434.60 PAY TO THE ORDER OF ROSICKI, ROSICKI & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE OLD COUNTRY ROAD CARLE PLACE, NEW YORK 11514 (516) 741-2585 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NEW YORK, NY 10021 13917 1-2/210 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD $ **434,60 Four Hundre~ Thirty-Four and 60/1************************************************************************************** TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DOLLARS ,"O ~-311 i,?,' ':0 2 ~-0000 ~' l,~:81, ii 500 20 Sii& 511' Name: Sparkling, Pointe L L C S C T M #59-10-1 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID: 95964 473889 SOUTHOLD NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY SCHOOL SOUTHOLD SCHOOL PRCLS 170 NURSERY 59.-10-1 39750 CR 48 = OWNER & MAILING INFO === LANG CORI & K~N 265 BABT~Y LA SOUTHOLD NY 11971 =MISC I RS-SS I I ILAND BANK ITOTAL **PRIOR** ILAND ITOTAL SALES INFORMATION 12243 SALE DATE 03/14/03 559 DATE : 03/05/2004 ROLL SEC TAF~LE TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 08 ASSESSMENT DATA **CURRENT** RES PERCENT 3,800 **TAXABLE** 7,100 COUNTY 4,700 TOWN 4,700 3,800 SCHOOL 4,700 7,100 ==DIMENSIONS ACRES 11.50 IBOOK IPAGE ....... TOTAL EXEMPTIONS CODE 41730 SALE PRICE PR OWNER AKSCIN RAYMOND JAY FI=NEXT 75.10- 03-050 i ............. I== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE 2,400 91 I FD028 IPK070 IT~T~020 I SW011 PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF 600,000 4 VALUE F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC F10=GO TO MENU 473889 59.-1-1 -NU~R# DATE TYPE 2942 11/29/65 PERMIT 10115 2/26/79 PERMIT 23407 5/02/96 PERMIT 10232 24717 o/oo/oo o/oo/oo o/oo/oo o/oo/oo o/oo/oo o/oo/o0 o/oo/oo OWNER: JAMES T & USE/DESCRIPTIONI PERMIT #2942 MOLLOY PERMIT #10115 TO MOVE DWELLI ADDITION Fl=More F7=Permit Detail F8=Co Detail F9=Preco F12=New Swis/Parcel F3=Exit 25235 Main Road, Cutchogue NY 11935 (631) 734 6405 Fax (631) 734 6407 To: Mr. Bruno Semon From: Nancy Steelman Town of Southold Planning Dept. Date: November 15, 2007 Re: Sparkling Pointe CC: [] Urgent x For Review [] Please Comment [] Please Reply · Description: Enclosed please find 6 Stamped copies of Revised Drawing ~f4 - Site Landscaping and Lighting Plan dated October 29, 2007. · Comments: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODIIOUSE Chair KENNETII L. EDWARDS MARTIN II. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPII L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Date: October 24, 2007 To: Planning Board From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer~__~ Re: Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC Project Description: This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq, ft. of production area on 12.088 acres parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48 approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-10-1 In above referenced site plan, the following has occurred: · On September 11, 2007, the Planning Board approved the site plan and closed the public hearing with fifteen (15) conditions. · On September 27, 2007, Samuel & Steelman Architects submitted a copy of the NYS DEC SPEDES General Permit No GP-02-01 approval ID is NYR 10N424 dated August 28, 2007 and this satisfies condition number 6. · On October 16, 2007, Samuel & Steelman Architects submitted an original copy of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval reference number under C10-07- 0008 dated October 9, 2007 and this satisfies condition number 3. · On October 22, 2007, Ural Talgart submitted a revised landscape plan known as "Landscape Plan along County ROW" plan number nine (9) and this satisfies condition number 1. · On October 23, 2007, Planning Department Staff, Heather Lanza, Mark Terry and Bruno Semon met with Ural Talgart to discuss the revised plan. The following summarizes the meeting discussion: · The vehicles be hidden and screened from view by the new landscape because the elevation of the parking surface is approximately 3' lower then the county ROW. · The designer choose to reuse existing landscape material in the proposed landscape changes. · The new proposed landscape on the properties east side replaced the sterile look of the previous proposed hedge. · It was noted that the new landscape is maximized based upon the angle of the property along the County ROW. · The parking on site would be best screened if the ApplicanffAgent could work with Suffolk County to receive permission to plant within the ROW. · It was also noted that an existing gas main hms along the County ROW / south side property line and it would be best not to plant directly on top of the gas main. · The site plan needs to have the "no bus signage" and the agreed upon overflow parking area noted on the document. Condition 2 includes the no bus signage requiremnt. · I explained that the application still requires the agent/applicant to submit the landscape revisions to the ZBA for approval and finalizing the SC DPW permit as noted in conditions 4 & 5. · It was agreed that I would place this on the work session agenda and contact the SC DPW office to discuss the ROW planting. On October 25, 2007, I spoke with Ken Danzic of the SCDPW and was informed that the County is typically open to planting in cases like this. The next step would be the applicant/agent finalize and execute the existing Suffolk County Work Permit, then send a letter requesting the use of the ROW and indicating what / where plantings will be proposed in the ROW. The letter should indicate that they agree to maintain the plantings and give the county the fight to remove the shrubs if work takes place. The planting in the ROW will require the applicant / agent to contact SCDPW. Staff recommendation will be the PB review the new proposed landscape plan for approval, accept the SPEDES and SCDHS submission for approval. Additionally, allow staff to prepare a resolution for the November meeting or a letter to the Agent/Applicant with all the existing conditions. The applicant will need to submit five copies of the new propose landscape drawing noting a change in the drawing label number 8 to number 4. Note the proposed landscape is subject to change by the ZBA and the applicant must submit the revised plan for approval by the ZBA and if changes occur the Planning Board reserves the fight to review such changes. Thank you in advance. Cc: file, hi, mt Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: 3 ~ZZZ>~.~:_~,~7 SCTM#: 1000- Date: Comments: 2523,5 Main Road, Cutchogue NY (63~} 734 Fax (631) 734 6407 Fax To'. Heather Lanza, Brur~o 8emon From: Ural Talgat Fax= 765 3.38 Phone~ 785 Ig38 Page: Datm October 18, 2007 Spad(;ing PoF'te Wir~ry CC: For R~-view F~,,,-,,e Comment X Please Reply Dea- Heat,~er L.a~a a~¢ Bru,qo Se~n~ I ~ pmpar~ a ~pe ~an~ng PI~ along ~ O~ ROW ~ ~i~ P~nle Winery 8r~d I wouid like to scl~ue a ~6~, at your eadi~t ~i~m, with you Ma~k tear , a~d ;nv~f~ ~vi~ ~ p~n. UraI Takjat ~mueis and Steelman OCT 1 $ ?.007 ~ 25235 Main Road, Cutchogue NY 11935 (631) 7346405 Fax(631)734 6407 To: Southold Town Planning Dept. From: Nancy Steelman Phone:765-1938 Date: October 16, 2007 Re: Sparkling Pointe CC: [] Urgent [] For Review [] Please Comment [] Please Reply · Description: Approved Plans from Suffolk County Department of Health for the Sanitary and Waste water systems as required for Site Plan Approval Conditions. · Comments: S A M U E L S & S T E E / M A N September 25, 2007 Mr. Bruno Semon Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Town of Southold, NY 11971 Re; Sparkling Point Vineyards 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM # 1000-59-10-1 Dear Mr. Semon, Enclosed, please find a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Acknowledgment of Notice of Intent for SPDES General Permit No GP-02-01. As stated in the Site Plan Approval Determination, this is required as a condition of the approval. If we can answer any questions or provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEWYORK 11935 (631 ) 734-6405 FAX (63I) 734 6407 ~ SEP 27 2007 $0uthold Town 09/18/2007 09:51 FAX ~002/003 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Bureau of Water Permits, 4th Floor 625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233-3505 Phone: (518) 402-8111 · Fax: (518) 402-9029 Website: www. dec.state.ny.us AJexanderB. Gran~s Com~s~ner 8/28/2007 Sparkling Pointe Winery LLC Thomas Rosicki 51 E. Bethpage Road Plainview NY 11803- Re: ACKNOWLEDGMENT of NOTICE of INTENT for Coverage Under SPDES General Permit for Storm _. W~t~er Discharges from CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY General permit No. GP-0~41 ' ~ Dear Prospective Permittee: This is to acknowledge that the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Department) has received a complete Notice of Intent (NOI) for coverage under General Permit No. GP-02-01 for the construction activities located at: Sparkling Pointe Winery 39750 County Road 48 Southold NY 11971- County: Suffolk Pursuant to Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) Article 17, Titles 7 and 8, ECL Article 70, discharges in accordance with GP-02-01 from the above construction site will be authorized 5 business days from 8/20/2007 which is the date we received your final NOI, unless notified ditl~'ently by the Department. The permit identification number for tiffs site is: NYR 10N424. Be sure to include this permit identification number on any forms or correspondence you send us. When coverage under the permit is no io_ngey nee~_ e~, y0u~m_u?t_s_ub__~fit a Notice o_f T_ _e~m?ation to the Depa, hi,ent. This authorization is conditioned upon the following: 1. The information submitted in the NOI received by the Department on 8/20/2007 is accurate and comolete. 2. You have developed a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that complies with GP-02-01 which must be implemented as the first element of construction at the above-noted construction site. 3. Activities related to the above construction site comply with all other requirements ofOP-02-01. 09/18/2007 09:52 FAX ~003/003 4. Payment of the annual $50 regulatory fee, which is billed separately by the Department in the early fan. The regulatory fee covers a period of one calendar year. in addition, as of September 1, 2004, construction stormwater permittees will also be assessed an initial authorization fee of $50 per acre of land disturbed and $300 per acre of future impervious area. The initial authorization fee covers the duration of the authorized disturbance. $. You have obtained all necessary Uniform Procedures Act (UPA) permits. You should check with your Regional Permit Administrator for further information. (Note: Construction activities cannot commence until all UPA pemfits have been issued.) Please be advised thru the Depa~ hn~nt may request a copy of your SWPPP for review. Should you have any questions regarding any aspect of the requirements specified in GP-02-01, please contact Dave Gasper at (518) 402-8114 or the undersigned at (518) 402-8109. -- - Sincere!y, Toni Cioffi Environmental Program Specialist I cc: RWE- 1 SWPPP Preparer PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND September 11, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Ms. Nancy Steelman Samuels and Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Winery Located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. w/o Tucker Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zoning District AC Dear Ms. Steelman: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 10, 2007: The final public hearing was closed. WHEREAS, this site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of offica, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq. ft. of production area on a 12.088-acre parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold. SCTM#1000-59-10-1; and WHEREAS, Thomas P. Rosicki is the owner of the property known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2004, the Southold Town Building Department issued a Notice of Disapproval indicating that the proposed construction requires a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals and approval [rom the Southold Town Planning Board; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2004, the agent, Stephen D. Mudd, working for the applicant, Thomas P. Rosicki, submitted a site plan application for approval; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session and accepted the application and requested application revisions from the agent, Stephen D. Mudd; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2004, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed an application for compliance with Town Code Section 100-31 A (4) for an area variance and granted approval under Appeal Number 5520 with a condition as follows: Sparklin,q Pointe Winery PaRe Two September 11, 2007 "that the existing trees and shrubs, be maintained at a minimum average height of 4' as a landscape buffer, as exists, between the building and CR 48" and the Southold Town Planning Board accepts this for conditional approval; and WHEREAS, on May 18, 2007, the agent of this application changed and Nancy Steelman of Samuels and Steelman working for the applicant, Thomas and Cynthia Rosicki, submitted a revised site plan application for approval; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2007, the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session and accepted the revised application and requested application revisions from the agent, Nancy Steelman; and WHEREAS, on July 10, 2007, the Suffolk County Department of Public Works responded, after review, and approved pursuant to 239f stating "A permit from this Department will be required pursuant to Section 136 of the Highway Law for the proposed access and any improvements this Department deems necessary along the County right-of-way" and the Southold Town Planning Board accepts this for approval; and WHEREAS, on July 16, 2007, the Southold Fire District responded, after review of the site plan, with approval of the map and found that "there is adequate fire protection"; additionally, "the Board would like to reserve the right to review the above site plan if changes occur to this property or to other property in the immediate area" and the Southold Town Planning Board accepts this response for conditional approval; and WHEREAS, on August 9, 2007, the agent, Nancy Steelman, of Samuels and Steelman, working for the applicant, Thomas and Cynthia Rosicki, submitted a revised site plan application for approval; and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2007, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR), Part 617 Article 6, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process of the Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, on August 15, 2007, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed and certified the site plan with "the proposed use winery is a permitted use in this A-C District" and the Southold Town Planning Board accepts this for approval; and WHEREAS, on August 22, 2007, the Southold Town Planning Board set the final public hearing for September 10, 2007 at 6:05 p.m.; and WHEREAS, on August 23, 2007, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed the associated site plan materials and issued a comment that they "fully endorse this application as shown today" and the Southold Town Planning Board accepted these comments for approval consideration; and WHEREAS, on August 23, 2007, the Suffolk County Department of Public Works responded with no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status and additionally indicated a permit has been previously issued under #48-236 and that such permit has not been fully executed by the applicant and the Southold Town Planning Board accepts this for approval; and WHEREAS, on August 29, 2007, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed the site plan material and responded with the following recommendations: Sparklinq Pointe Winery Pa.qe Three September 11, 2007 Please note that the proposed disturbance resulting from the renovation of existing facilities and other construction activities which include grading of this site will be greater than one (1) acre in area. [This would include the new driveways, drainage areas, parking areas and the proposed expansion of the building envelope.] This project will require coverage from NYS Department of Environmental Protection (DEC) under the Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Program. The developer must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm-water Run-off from Construction Activity (GP-02-01) prior to the initiation of construction activities. Drainage calculations have been provided and the proposed drainage design meets the minimum requirements of Town Code Section 236 for Storm-water Management. I have also reviewed the ZBA Determination on file for this project, (Appeal No. 5520 - Setback Variance). This determination, which approved the existing front yard set-back, had a condition attached to it. It states, "with the CONDITION that the existing trees and shrubs, be maintained at a minimum average height of 4' as a landscape buffer, as exists., between the building and CR 4~'. The site plan calls for existing vegetation to be removed. This item should be reviewed and approved by the ZBA. If the proposed landscaping does not meet with their approval, the landscape plan will need to be revised accordingly and the Planning Board agreed with these recommendations; and WHEREAS, on September 6, 2007, Nancy Steelman, R.A., submitted six (6) revised site plans, a letter indicating" an additional note on our Landscape Plan, Sheet #4 stating existing plantings to be removed pending ZBA approval" and enclosed a copy of the NYSDEC SPEDES General Permit Application for the file and the Southold Town Planning Board accepts this for approval; and WHEREAS, on September 7, 2007, Mark Terry, the LWRP Coordinator, issued recommendations in a letter, after review of the site plan materials, that the proposed action "is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and, therefore, is CONSISTENT with the LWRP" and the Southold Town Planning Board accepts this recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, on September 10, 2007, the Planning Board has not received any additional comments or objections to the proposed action; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 55, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, the following items shall be required: All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet Town Code Requirements, 2. All signs shall meet Southold Town Zoning Codes and shall be subject to approval of the Southold Town Building Inspector. Sparklinq Pointe Winery Page Four September 11, 2007 3. As per the Landscape Survivability Guarantee, the applicant agrees to replace any of the landscaping which dies within three (3) years of planting; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that on September 10, 2007, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has reviewed the proposed action under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and has determined that the action is consistent with the Policy Standards as noted in the September 7, 2007 report prepared by the LWRP Coordinator; and be it further RESOLVED, that pursuant to Southold Town Code 280-131 Part I, the applicant agrees to incorporate all the requirements, comments, and recommendations of each reviewing agency as referenced above and as indicated on the site plan and corresponding attachments; and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant approval on the site plan set 1-8 prepared by Samuels & Steelman and certified by Nancy L. Steelman Architect, dated as follows: Plan Numbers 1,5, 6, 7 & 8 are dated August 7, 2007, Plan Numbers 2 & 3 are dated August 30, 2007 and Plan Number 4 is dated September 6, 2007, and authorize the Chairperson to endorse the site plan after the revised landscape plan is submitted and approved by the Planning Board with the following conditions: The owner, agent and/or applicant proposed to enhance/change the landscape on the County Road 48 Frontage and submit a revised landscape plan Drawing Number 4 detailing the landscape enhancements/changes to be reviewed and approved by the Southold Town Planning Board. ,¸ The owner, agent and/or applicant proposed to install signage that strictly prohibits bus use of the site and install such signage to the satisfaction of the Southold Town Planning Board. The owner, agent and/or applicant shall receive approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for the approved construction and submit such approval to the Southold Town Planning Department for review. If such approval varies from this approved site plan, the Planning Board reserves the right to review a new site plan application. A copy of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services approved plan must be submitted to the Southold Town Planning Department within thirty (30) days of receipt. If applicant/agent/owner fails to adhere to this requirement, this approval shall become null and void. The owner, agent and/or applicant shall apply for a changed approval from the Southold Town ZBA for the landscape changes as shown on this site plan or must meet the condition as imposed by the ZBA in Appeal #5520 and revise the approved site plan landscape as required. The owner, agent and/or applicant shall receive permit approval from the Suffolk County Department of Public Works for the approved construction and submit such approval to the Southold Town Planning Department for review. If such approval varies from this approved site plan, the Planning Board reserves the right to review a new site plan Sparklinq Pointe Winery Pa.qe F ve September 11, 2007 application. A copy of the Suffolk County Department of Public Works approved plan must be submitted to the Southold Town Planning Department within thirty (30) days of receipt. If applicant/agent/owner fails to adhere to this requirement, this approval shall become null and void. If necessary, the applicant/agent/owner must obtain a Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS DEC) for the approved construction. A copy of the NYS DEC SPDES Permit must be submitted to the Southold Town Planning Department within thirty (30) days of receipt. The owner, agent and/or applicant agrees to build out the site and install all handicap parking stalls, access aisles and signage in compliance with New York State Code and ADA Requirements. The owner, agent and/or applicant understands and agrees that the Southold Town Building Department will review the approved proposed build out under a Building Permit Application and that all construction must meet or exceed the required codes and this site plan approval is subject to change to conform to any requirement of Local & State Regulations as applied during the building permit review. 9. The site plan approval requires that all work proposed on the site plan shall be completed within three (3) years from the date of this resolution. 10. Prior to the request for the Certificate of Occupancy, the owner or authorized agent must request, in writing, the said Building Inspector and the Planning Board to perform an on- site inspection to find the site improvements are in conformity with the approved site plan. 11. Prior to the request for an on-site inspection, the applicant/agent/owner must submit a copy of all required approvals from any necessary agencies to the Southold Town Planning Department. 12. Upon inspection, if the as-built site improvements vary from the approved site plan, the Planning Board reserves the right to request a certified as-built site plan detailing all the changes. 13. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval, and any such changes without Planning Board approval will be subject to referral to the Town Attorney's Office for possible legal action. 14. The Planning Board will issue a final site plan approval in the form of a letter following a site inspection and at the time the site improvements are found to be in conformance with the approved site plan. 15. The owner, agent and/or applicant must provide and ensure all necessary safety precautions are implemented before, during and upon completion of any construction at the site for anyone on the site as may be required by all authorities having jurisdiction. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration. Sparkling Pointe Winery Paqe Six September 11,2007 If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, hous~e Chairperson encl.: Neg. Dec. cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Southold Town LWRP Coordinator, Mark Terry Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook - SPEDES Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significance September 10, 2007 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Sparkling Pointe Winery SCTM#: 1000-59-10-1 Location: On the south side of County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane, Southold SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq. ft. of production area on a 12.088-acre parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold. SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. No major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy will occur. No known creation of a hazard to human health is expected to occur. No substantial adverse change in existing air quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels, no substantial increase in solid waste production, potential of erosion, flooding, leaching or drainage problems will occur as a result of this action. SEQR Negative Declaration Page Two September 10, 2007 The proposed action will not cause a substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses. The property is zoned Agricultural (AC). No significant removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or fauna, no substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, no significant impacts on a significant habitat area, no substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or endangered species of animal or plant or the habitat of such a species, and no other significant adverse impacts to natural resources will occur. The proposed action will not impair the character or quality of important historical, archaeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. The proposed action is not in material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. Based upon such, no significant adverse impacts to the environment are expected to occur should the project be implemented as planned. On August 23, 2007, the Suffolk County Department of Public Works responded with no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status and additionally indicated a permit has been previously issued under #48-236 and that such permit has not been fully executed by the applicant and the Southold Town Planning Board accepts this for approval. There has not been any correspondence received from any other agencies. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from these agencies. For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: Telephone Number: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Southold Town Planning Board 631-765-1938 CC; Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Southold Town LWRP Coordinator, Mark Terry Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook - SPEDES Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on ~ I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every pr°pe~y~iccI}a-b'buts and~eYery'pli°per~y'w'hli~ch is acr°ss °n. ~" SL%~'%.dH.~ j~l~ II ~/'~ Address oo7 I~ate I ~otary Public P~TRtCIA RICHARDS Notary Pdbtle, Stete of New York No. 0 ~ RI6042467 Qualified ih auffolk County Commission Ex{~t~*es May 30, 8EP - 7 2007 PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVlT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon~ Fri. 9/7/07 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Sparklin,q Points Winery SCTM#s: 1000-59-10-1 Date of Hearing: Monday, September 10, 2007, 6:05 p.m. · Complete it~ns 1,2, ~ 3. Also COmplete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is de~lred. F'dnt your name ~ ad~drees on,he reverse s° thet we can return the card t~'you. A. Signature 3. Service Type ~Ceftlfied Mall r-i Express Mail Registered r-i Return Receipt for Jr-i Insured Ma~l [] C.O.D~ 4. Restricted Defive~/? (Extra Fee) 3811, February 2004 ~ ~ Enterprises ~.0. Box 119 Illlem~, NY 11958 7005 0390 0004 t186 4622 D~ , 71Z,~ R'etum Receipt 3. Sewice Type [] Insured Mall 4. Restricted De~lver/? (Extra Fee) OFF a Form 3811, February 2004 · "~ ~ to: rn == P.O. Box 19 7005 0390 0004 1186 4677 County Water Auth(~lly ~ Highway OMMIle, NY 11769 39695 CR 48 NY 11971 D. Is deliveff m D. Is ~(~l~dmas dreamt from ~em 1 ? · Complet~ items 1, 2, end 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Number · Print your name and address on the reverse (/har~ ~/abe0 ~-~ 0 0 5 03! so that we can return the card to you. F¢xm3811' February2004"' / Dom~tlcRstur~ · Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article A~dreesed to: i' emaF. Kruk : Iha~ P. Kruk .leulhold, NY 11971 Davtd Surozenski 39765 CR48 Southold, NY1971 7005 0 2. A~ticle Nun~ber YES, ecter delivery address below: [] NO 3. '~DC.,e~llf~ Mail [] Express Mall · [] Insured Mall r=l C.O.D, 4. Restrfcted Deliver? (F_.J~a Fee) I-I Yes 7005 0390 0004 1186 4639 Faro 3811, February 2004 Domestic Rstu~-- PS Form 3811, Februa~ 20O4 ~c Rstum Receipt ~02595-02-1d-754o C OFFi )AL Postage 39625 CR 48 · Complate Items 1,2,and 3. Als° c°mplete item 4 if Restricted Deliver/is desired. · print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you.... · Attach this card to the back of the mmlp~ece, or ~n the front if space permits.. Anne A. Hubba~l[~,, 9 Legget Rd. Bronxvllle, NY 10708 3~e~t addree~ different ~3m Itm~ 17 rgyes ff YES, enter d~Ne~ addrMs below- r'lNo 39765 CR 48 ~hawn P. Kink 2. Articte Number ........... 004 ..............-'~'~Ret~rn Re,pt -- ~ pSFo ...... _ e. ~by. FPdntedNeme) lC. Date o~ De, ivey : '. .............. 'id'mo ~,~¢k of tho mmlpmce, ~._[~ I MTA - LIRR Jamaiga Station Mall code 3146 Jamaica, NY 11435 3. Se~ice Type [] Exp(e6s MEUl [] Retum Receipt for Merchandise [] C.O.D. 4. ReMricted Deliver? (Extra Fee) [] Ye~ 9 Legget Rd. Article Number PS Form 3811, February 2004 2745 Tuckem Lane Soulhold, NY 11971 7005 0390 0004 1186 4691 [] Return Receipt fo~ Me~handise [] Insured Mall [] C.O.D. 2. Azticle Number 0'~,,~'~,,~,,,,~/~ i 7005 0390 0004 1186 4660 · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Detive~y is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the maJlpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Stephen & Patricia Mudd 39695 CR 48 Southold NY 11971 2. Article Number X [] Agent 4. Re~131cted Dellve~3~? (Extra F6e) [] Ye~ 7005 0390 0004 1186 4615 PS Form 3811, February 2004 September 6, 2007 S A M U E L S & S T E E L M A N Ms. Jeri Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Town of Southold, NY 11971 Re: Sparkling Pointe Winery 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM # 1000-59-10-1 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, Enclosed, please find six (6) sets of the following final drawings dated August 7, 2007 for Site Plan Approval for Sparkling Pointe Winery: 1. Enlarged Site Plan 2. Site Utilities Plan 3. Overall Site Plan, Details and Calculations 4. Site Landscaping and Lighting Plan 5. Main Level Floor Plan 6. Lower Level Floor Plan 7. North and South Elevations 8. West and East Elevations Please note that we have included an additional note on our Landscape Plan, Sheet #4, stating "Existing plantings to be removed pending ZBA approval". We have included this note due to a condition stated in the Variance determination that the existing plantings will remain. In lieu of the existing plantings we are planning a extensive evergreen buffer that will continue along the entire length of the front property line. The existing plantings are a mix of some evergreen but mostly deciduous plants that have not been adequately maintained in many years. Upon approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals we will forward their response to the Planning Board. It has been requested by Jamie Richter, Town Engineer that we apply for a SPDES General Permit. This application was submitted to the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation on July 25, 2007 and we have enclosed a copy. ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEWYORK 11935 (631) 734 6405 FAX (631) 734-6407 If we can answer any questions or provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Sa~ely& Steelman/~itects NOTICE OF INTENT New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water 625 Albany, New York t2233-3505 I~or DEC ~se Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity Under State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Seneral Permit # GP-02-01 Ail sections must be completed unless otherwise noted. Failure to complete all items may result in this form being returned to you, thereby delaying your coverage under this General Permit. Applicants must read and understand the conditions of the permit and prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prior to submitting this NOI. Applicants are responsible for identifying and obtaining other DEC permits that may be required. To properly complete this form, please refer to the Instruction Manual which can be accessed at http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/water~Ddf/instr_man.pdf THIS RETURN -IMPORTANT- FORM FOR MACHINE PRINT ONLY THIS FORM TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE OWNER/OPE~TOR ~ST SIGN FO~ Page i of 9 _~ 7599059161 ----~ 1. Provide the Geographic Coordinates for the project site in NYTM Units. To do this you must go to the NYSDEC Stormwater Interactive Map on the DEC website at: www.dec.state.ny.us/website/imsmaps/stormwater/viewer.ht~ Zoom into your Project Location such that you can accurately click on the centroid of your site. Once you have located your project site go to the dropdown menu on the left and choose "Get Coordinates". Click on the center of your site and a small window containing the X, Y coordinates in UTM will pop up. Transcribe these coordinates into the boxes below. For problems with the interactive map use the help function. 2. What is the nature of this construction project? Page 2 of 9 __~ 4198059163 3. Select the predominant land use for both pre and post development conditions. SEI~CT ONLY ONE CHOICE FOR F~%CH 4. Will future use of this site be an agricultural property as defined by the NYS Agriculture and Markets Law ? 5. Is this a project which does not require coverage under the General Permit (e.g. Project done under an Individual SPDES Permit, or department approved remediation)? 6. Is this property owned by a state authority, state agency or local government? 7. In accordance with the larger common plan of development or sale; enter the total project site acreage, the acreage to be disturbed and the future impervious area {acreage)within the disturbed area. Round to the nearest tenth of an acre. 8. Will there be more than 5 acres disturbed at any given time? ~ 9. Indicate the percentage of each Hydrologic Soil Group(HSG) at the site. Page 3 of 9 F3431059162 10. IS this a phased project? .{if yes, The SWPPP must address all planned phases) 11. Enter the planned start and end dates of the disturbance activities 12. Provide the name of the nearest, natural, classified surface waterbody(ies) into which construction site runoff has the potential to discharge. P e C~O n 1 C iB a!y 15. Does the site runoff enter a separate storm sewer system- including roadside drains, swales, ditches, culverts, etc? (if no, skip question 16 ) 16. What is the name of the municipality/entity that owns the separate storm sewer system? 17.a Co~inedD°es any Sewer? runoff from the site enter a sewer classified as Page 4 of 9 __~ 3875059164 18. Has the required Erosion and Sediment Control component of the SWPPP been developed in conformance with the current NYS Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (aka Blue Book) ? 19. Does this construction activity require the development of a SWPPP that includes Water Quality and Quantity Control components (Post-Construction Stormwater Management Practices} If no, Skip question 20 20. Have the Water Quality and Quantity Control components of the SWPPP been developed in comformance with the current NYS Stormwater Management Design Manual ? NOTE: If you answered no to question 18 or 20, Pursuant to Part I.D.3. (b) of the permit, ~ou must have your SWPPP prepared and certified by a licensed/certified professional and the SWPPP is subject to a 60-business day review. Please provide further details in the details/comment section on the last page of this form. 21. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) was prepared by: Page 5 of 9 ~ 2200059165 Erosion and Sediment Control Practices 22. Has a construction sequence schedule for the planned management practices been prepared? 23. Select all of the erosion and sediment control practices that will be employed on the project site. Page 6 of 9 __~ 3471059166 Water Quality and Quantity Control Important:Completion of Questions 24-30 is not required if the project: Disturbs less than 5 acres and is planned for single-family residential hemes(including subdivisions) or construction on agricultural property and does not have a discharge to a 303(d) water or is not located within a T~DL watershed. Additionally, sites where there will be no future impervious area within the disturbed area an~d that do not have a change(pre to post development)in hydrology do not need to complete questions 24-30. 24. Indicate all the permanent Stormwater Management Practice(s) that will be installed on this site O Yes 0 No F2725059167 25. Provide the total water quality volume required and the total provided for the site. 26. Provide the following Unified Stormwater Sizing Criteria for the site. IMPORTANT: For questions 27 and 28 impervious area should be calculated considering the project site and all offsite areas that drain to the post-construction stormwater management practice(s) (Total Drainage Area = Project Site + Offsite areas) 27. Pre-Construction Impervious Area - As a percent of the Total Drainage Area enter the percentage of the existing impervious areas before construction begins. 28. Post-Construction Impervious Area - As a percent of the Total Drainage Area enter the percentage of the future impervious areas that will be created/remain on the site after completion of construction. 29. Indicate the total number of permanent stormwater management practices to be installed 30. Provide the total number of stormwater discharge points from the site (include discharges to either surface waters or to seperate storm sewer svstems) Page 8 of 9 31. Select any other DEC permits that are required for this project or ~ 32. If this NOI is being submitted for the purpose of continuing coverage under a general permit for stormwater runoff from construction activities, please indicate the former SPDES number assigned. I have read or been advised of the permit conditions and believe that I understand them. I also understand that, under the te~ns of the permit, there may be reporting requirements. I also certify under penalty of law that this doc%unent and the corresponding documents were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person(s) who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the info~ation s%lbmitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisor~nent for knowing violations. I further understand that coverage under the general permit will be identified in the acknowled~nent that I will receive as a result of submitting this NOI and can be as long as sixty (60) days as provided for in the general pe~it. I also understand that, by submitting this NOI, I am acknowledging that the SWPPP has been developed and will be implemented as the first element of construction, and agreeing to comply with all the terms and conditions of the general permit for which this NOI is being s%lbn~tted. Page 9 of 9 ~ iCOUNTY OF SUFFOLKQ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE September 4, 2007 Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Re: S.C.P.C. No.: Sparkling Pointe Winery SD-07-STP (7/6/07) Dear Sir: THOMAS ISLES, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Your notification for SEQR Coordination was received by our agency on August 20, 2007. Please be advised that our agency, the Suffolk County Planning Commission has no objection to the Town of Southold assuming Lead Agency status for the above referenced. The Suffolk County Planning Commission reserves the right to comment on this proposed action in the future and wants to be kept informed of all actions taken pursuant to SEQRA and to be provided with copies of all EAF's, DEIS's and FEIS's, etc. Please note that this action has been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for review and received a notice of Local Determination on July 6, 2007. Chief Planner APF:cc LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR · P.O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY ! 1788-0099 TELECOPIER (631} 853-4044 SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (631)-765-9015 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. [[ AU$ 30 2007 Re: Sparkling Point Winery 39750 County Road 48 SCTM #: 1000-59-10-01 As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. This site plan has been prepared by the office of Samuels and Steelman, Architects, and has been dated August 7, 2007. Please consider the following: 1. Please note that the proposed disturbance resulting from the renovation of existing facilities and other construction activities which include grading of this site will be greater than one (1) acre in area. [This would include the new driveways, drainage areas, parking areas and the proposed expansion of the building envelope.] This project will require coverage from NYS Department of Environmental Protection (DEC) under the Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ($PDES) Program. The Developer must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm-water Runoff from Construction Activity (GP- 02-01) pdor to the initiation of construction activities. 2. Drainage calculations have been provided and the proposed drainage design meets the minimum requirements of Town Code Section 236 for Storm-water Management. 3. I have also reviewed the ZBA Determination on file for this project, (Appeal No. 5520 - Setback Variance). This determination, which approved the existing front yard set-back had a condition attached to it. It states, "With the CONDITION that the existing trees and shrubs, be maintained at a minimum average height of 4'as a landscape buffer, as exists, between the building and CR 48". The site plan calls for existing vegetation to be removed. This item should be reviewed and approved bythe ZBA. If the proposed landscaping does not meet with their approval, the landscape plan will need to be revised accordingly. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. /// James A. Richter, R.A. THOMAS LAGUARDIA, P.E. CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COUNTY OF SUFFOLKe STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GILBERT ANDERSON, P.E. COMMIEEIONER LOUIS CALDERONE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Town of Southold Planff~ng Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N. Y. 11971-0957 Attn: Bnmo Semon Re: CR 48, North Rd. Sparkling Pointe Winery SCTM#1000-59~10-1 Dear Mr. Semon: August 23, 2007 This Department has reviewed the above-referenced site plan and offers the following comments: This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency stares for this proposed development. This Department's acceptance of the Town as lead agency, pursuant to Part 617, Article 8 (SEQRA), in no way waives the County's fights pursuant to 239F of the General Municipal Law and Section 136 of the Highway Law. A permit from this Department, g48-236, has been previously issued for this development. Please note that this permit has not been executed by the applicant. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-4100. WH:MPC:in Very truly yours, William Hillman, P.E. SUFFOLK COUNTY IE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Town of Southold ,Architectural Review Committee Minutes 4:00PM, August 23, 2007 Town Hall Conference Room Members Present: Chairman Sanford Hanauer; Ural Talgat; Nicholas Planamento; Elizabeth Thompson; Ron McGreevy; Herbert Ernest; Tom Wickham, Town Board Member; Amy Thiel, Planning Board Staff; Elizabeth Cantrell, Secretary. The minutes for the July 26, 2007 meeting were approved. Pre-Submission Applications: PURITA WINERY SCTM #1000-51-3-4.3 Nancy Steelman of Samuels & Steelman presented the application. Ural Talgat & Amy Thiel recused themselves of this application. APPROVED: The committee members fully endorse this application as it is shown today. MOTION MADE: Elizabeth Thompson; SECOND: Herbert Ernest Revisited Applications: SCTM #1000-59-10-1 Nancy Steelman of Samuels & Steelman presented the application. Ural Talgat recused himself of this application. APPROVED: The committee members fully endorse this application as it is shown today. MOTION MADE: Sanford Hanauer; SECOND: Nicholas Planamento WAREX PROJECT SCTM %1000-142-1-27 APPROVED WITH RECOMMENDATIONS: Low shrub Juniper in lieu of the Hemlock; the canopy columns should match the building pilasters by adding the matching base and capitol; the two dog dormer roofs should be a gable style roof rather than a hip style roof. The committee recommends the applicant consider a redesign of the street-front sign to be more similar in design as the Hess gas station in Southampton on Montauk Highway. MOTION MADE: Ural Talgat; SECOND: Herbert Ernest; All in Favor New Applications: GROUP FOR THE EAST END OFFICE SCTM #1000-62-1-4 Kate Schertel, Special Assistant to the President, presented the application. APPROVED: The committee members fully endorse this application as it is shown today. The committee members recommend putting traditional lighting fixtures on the building rather than the modern lighting fixtures. The parking area lighting fixtures can be modern or traditional and is at the applicant's discretion. All lighting is to be Dark Sky compliant. The type of bulb recommended for the lighting fixtures is metal halide. MOTION MADE: Ural Talgat; SECOND: Elizabeth Thompson A motion was made to close the meeting at 6:20PM. Ail in favor. 2 #8507 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Dina MacDonald of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this 2007 Noflee of l~abll¢ Hea~ing I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and ArLicle XXv of the Code of the Town of Southold a public hear- / thg will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at th~ Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 10th day of Sq*tember, 200? on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdi- vision of Allan & Ellen Wexier located on the s/s/o North Bayview Road, ap- proximately 415 ft w/o Paradise Point Road, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 79-8-18.1 __6:05 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for v~ .... ~ I · ~catedon the s/s/o County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. w/o Tuckers Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold, Town of Southold, CoUnty of Suffolk; State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-59-10q 6:10 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC/East Marion Fire Disbict located on the n/ s/o NYS Route ~5, approximately 494' w/o Stars Road, in East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-31-3-11.31 Dated: BY ORDER OFTHE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn R W(x)dhouse Chairporson 8307-1T CHRISTINA VOLINSKI NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK NO. 01-V06105050 Qualified In Suffolk County Commle~lon Expire8 February 28, 2008 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the '10th day of September, 2007 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision of Allan & Ellen Wexler located on the s/s/o North Bayview Road, approximately 415 ft. w/o Paradise Point Road, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-79-8-18.1 6:05 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for~ located on the s/s/o County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. w/o Tuckers Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-59-10-1 Dated: 8/23/07 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 30, 2007 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Suffolk Times Page 1 of 1 Kalin, Carol From: JOAN ANN [jaweber@timesreview.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:16 AM To: Kalin, Carol Subject: Re: Legal Ad for 8/30 Edition Carol: Received Legal Ad for 8/30 Edition. Also, received your second e-mail adding an additional hearing. It will appear in the Suffolk Times, Legal Notice 8507 Joan Ann ..... Original Message ..... From: Kalin, Carol To: jaweber~.timesreview.com Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:57 PM Subject: Legal Ad for 8/30 Edition Joan Ann, Please print the attached legal ad for the Planning Board's 9/10 Regular Meeting in the 8/30 edition and send me confirmation of receipt of this request: 6:00 p.m. Wexler Standard Subdivision 6:05 p.m. Sparkling Pointe Winery Thanks - Carol 8/28/2007 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Ch~dr KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 10th day of September, 2007 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision of Allan & Ellen Wexler located on the s/s/o North Bayview Road, approximately 415 ft. w/o Paradise Point Road, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-79-8-18.1 6:05 p.m. Proposed Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Winery located on the s/s/o County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. w/o Tuckers Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-59-10-1 Dated: 8/23/07 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 23rd day of August, 2007 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 9/10~07 Re.qular Meetin.q: 6:00 p.m. 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Standard Subdivision of Allan & Ellen Wexler, SCTM#1000-79-8-18.1 Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Winery, SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Sworn to before me this Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board MELANIE DOROSKI NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No, 01D04634870 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Ex,0ires Septamber 30, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 S~ate Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 August22,2007 Ms. Nancy Steelman Samuels and Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Winery 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zoning District AC Dear Ms. Steelman: The final public hearing regarding the maps for the above-referenced amended site plan has been scheduled for Monday, September 10, 2007, at 6:05 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 55, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Postin,q along with the certified mailin.cl receipts AND the signed .qreen return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, September 7m. The sign and the post need to be returned to the Plannin.q Board Office after the public hearin,q. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, O~'odhouse Chairperson Encl. Southold Town Plannin.q Board Notice to Adiacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-59-10-1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the A-C (Agricultural-Conservation) Zoning District; That the application is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq. ft. of production area with 41 parking spaces on a 12.088-acre parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in $outhold; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. (2nd FI., North Fork Bank) Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, Sept. 10, 2007 at 6:05 p.m. in the Meetin.q Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner Name: Thomas & Cynthia Rosicki/Sparkling Pointe Winery Date: 8/22/07 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 12:00 noon, Fri., 9~7~07 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Sparklin.cI Pointe Winery SCTM#s: 1000-59-10-1 Date of Hearing: Monday, September 10, 2007, 6:05 p.m. Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows § 55-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [Amended 6-3-2003 by L.L. No. 12-2003] Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application or petition is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. Notice relating to a public hearing on an application or petition shall be provided as follows: A. Town responsibility for publication of notice. The reviewing board or commission shall cause a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. Applicant or petitioner responsibility for posting and mailing notice. An application or petition, initiated, proposed or requested by an applicant or petitioner, other than a Town board or commission, shall also be subject to additional notice requirements set forth below: (2) The applicant or petitioner is required to erect the sign provided by the Town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application or petition abuts, giving notice of the application or petition, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than 10 feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven days immediately preceding the date o£the public hearing. The applicant, petitioner or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. (2) The applicant or petitioner is required to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the property included in the application or petition. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application or petition and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The notice shall include description of the street location and area of the subject property, nature of relief or approval involved, and date, time and place of hearing. The applicant, petitioner or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision prior to commencement of the public hearing. THOMAS & CYNTHIA ROSICKI SPARKLING POINTE WINERY SITE PLAN 1000-59-10-1 Proposed site plan for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq. ft. of production area with 41 parking spaces. ~MONDAY- SEPT. 10, 2007 - 6:05 P.M. NOTICE ~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Q [ .... ,o,.~. $OUTHOLD SECTION NO ........... / / NOTICE ~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~ ~ .... ~* SffiTH~D ~CTION NO SAMUELS & STEELMAN AR~I~I"ECTS 25235 Main Road CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 1].935 (631) 734-6405 Fax (631) 734-6407 > WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ttached [] Under separate cover via [] Shop drawings [] Prints [] Plans [] Samples [] Copy of letter ~ Change order '~ ~ the following items: [~ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION / /- /o THESE ARE TRANSMIttED as checked below: [] For approval [] For your use XAs requested [] For review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS [] Approved as submitted [] Resubmit [] Approved as noted [] Submit [] Returned for corrections [] Return [] copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-9502 Telephone (631) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson FROM: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector DATE: August 15, 2007 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Sparkling Pointe Vineyards Location: 39750 C.R. 48, Southold SCTM# 1000 - Section 5~9- Block I__Q0 - Lot 1 Date: August 7, 2007 Revised Date: 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 144 AND 280 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE *WINERY IS A,.P,,~RMITTED USE IN THIS A-C DISTRICT~A, BJD IS-SO CERTiFI'I~.~''~ Michael J. Ver~ Chief Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOVCNSEND August13,2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: ~L . P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 S~ate Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Sparkling Pointe Winery 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC Requested Action: This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq. ft. of production area on a 12.088-acre parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold. SCTM#1000-59-10-1 SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( x ) Unlisted Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer (631) 765-1938 Sparkling Pointe Winery Lead Agency Coordination Request Page 2 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: x ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Enclosed is the Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, use Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Beard of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Southold Town LWRP Coordinator, Mark Terry Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook - SPEDES Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND August13,2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OI~'YlCE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Sparkling Pointe Winery 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC Requested Action: This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq. ft. of production area on a 12.088-acre parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold. SCTM#1000-59-10-1 SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( x ) Unlisted Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer (631) 765-1938 Sparkling Pointe Winery Lead Agency Coordination Request Page 2 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: x ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Enclosed is the Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, ~erilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Southold Town LWRP Coordinator, Mark Terry Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook - SPEDES Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 August14,2007 Ms. Nancy Steelman Samuels and Steelman Architects 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Winery 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zoning District AC Dear Ms. Steelman: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 13, 2007: WHEREAS, this site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq. ft. of production area on a 12.088-acre parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane, known as 39750 County Road 48, in Southold. SCTM#1000-59-10-1; and WHEREAS, Thomas P. Rosicki is the owner of the property located approximately 546' w/o of Maple Avenue in Southold; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2004, the Southold Town Building Department issued a Notice of Disapproval indicating that the proposed construction requires a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals and approval from the Southold Town Planning Board; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2004, the agent, Stephen D. Mudd, working for the applicant, Thomas P. Rosicki, submitted a site plan application for approval; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session and accepted the application and requested application revisions from the agent, Stephen D. Mudd; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2004, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed an application in compliance with Town Code Section 100-31 A (4) for an area variance and granted approval under Appeal Number 5520 with a condition as follows: Sparklinq Pointe Winery Pa.qe Two Auqust 14, 2007 "that the existing trees and shrubs, be maintained at a minimum average height of 4' as a landscape buffer, as exists, between the building and CR 48" and the Southold Town Planning Board accepts this for conditional approval; and WHEREAS, on May 18, 2007, the agent of this application changed and Nancy Steelman of Samuels and Steelman working for the applicant, Thomas and Cynthia Rosicki, submitted a revised site plan application for approval; and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2007, the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session and accepted the revised application and requested application revisions from the agent, Nancy Steelman; and WHEREAS, on August 9, 2007, the agent Nancy Steelman of Samuels and Steelman working for the applicant, Thomas and Cynthia Rosicki, submitted a revised site plan application for approval; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Unlisted Action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Chairperson Encl. cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southoid Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Southold Town LWRP Coordinator, Mark Terry Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook - SPEDES Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Date: August 10, 2007 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer ~j Re; Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-1041 Zone AC Status: Pending approval at the Planning Board September Meeting, please review and respond ASAP. This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq, ft. of production area with 41 parking spaces on 12.088 acres parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48 approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-10-1 In reference to the above, attached you wilt find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. Site plan enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan set prepared by Samuels & Steelman dated August 7, 2007. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MEMORANDUM Date: August 10, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mark Terry, Local Water Revitalization Program Coordinator From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewert~ Re: Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC Status: Pending approval at the Planning Board September Meeting, please review and respond ASAP. This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. fi. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq, ft. of production area on 12.088 acres parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48 approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-10-1 In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan and a copy of the LWRP form. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for LWRP consistency. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan set prepared by Samuels & Steelman dated August 7, 2007. S A M U E L S & S T E E L M A N August7,2007 Mr. Bruno Semon Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Town of Southold, NY 11971 Re: Sparkling PointeWinery 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM # 1000-59-10-1 Dear Mr. Semon, Enclosed, please find six (6) sets of the following final drawings for Site Plan Approval for Sparkling Pointe Winery: 1. Enlarged Site Plan 2. Site Utilities Plan 3. Overall Site Plan, Details and Calculations 4. Site Landscaping and Lighting Plan 5. Main Level Floor Plan 6. Lower Level Floor Plan 7. North and South Elevations 8. West and East Elevations In addition, we will be submitting samples and colors to the Architectural Review Board at their next meeting. If we can answer any questions or provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. (63]) 734 6405 FAX (631 ~ 734-6407 July 16, 2007 SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 908. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 (631) 765-4305 FAX (631) 765-5076 Bruno Semen, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: SCTM# 1000-59-10-1 Sparkling Pointe Vineyards Dear Bruno: Please be advised that the Board of Fire Co[~lj~JO~I:~ I;'l~e reviewed the above mentioned map and found that there is adequate fire protection for this site plan. The Board would like to reserve the right to review the above site plan if any changes occur to this property or to other property in the immediate area. Sincerely, Fire District Secretary THOMAS LAGUARDIA, P.E. CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS GILBERT ANDERSON, P.E. COMMISSIONER LOUIS CALDERONE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CR#48 Project Name: Sparkling Point Winery Applicant Name: Samuels & Steelman Architects Project Location: Southold SCTM # 1000-59-10-1 Date: 7/10/07 APPROVED DISAPPROVED APPROVAL WITHHELD Pursuant to Section 239f of the New York State General Municipal Law and subject to the stated conditions: A permit f~om this Department will be required pursuant to Section 136 of the Highway Law for the proposed access and any improvements this Department deems necessary along the County right-of-way. ~liam Hillman, P. E. Chief Engineer SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER · YAPHANK, N.Y. 11980 · (631) 852-4010 335 YAPHANK AVENUE FAX (631) 852-4150 TOWN/VILLAGE OF ADDRESS ' 3:: JUN 2 o i807 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 335 YAPHANK AVENUE YAPHANK, NY 11980 JUN ~PT Or eOBLiC,WO~KS Dear Sir: IEF ENGINE~ OFF~ In accordance with ~ecIio~ ]39f of the General Municipal Law of the consolidated Laws of the 5tare of New York. this is to notify tile Cotnmissioner of Public Works of the County of Suffolk that Name&Addressofapplicant q_.~2z{':t~.~'~:~- '~¢ c~'X~:~:~-~f.~ , has applied to the Town/Village of (~__~gZ~...~ for the issuance ora permit in reference to property located on the: Ni~E W side C/~.~.~7.0/.//~,,~ D,sta.ce Village As shown on the attached survey or site plan (3 copies needed), dated Town 4h 7, We shall withhold further action on this application for ten (10) business days for the aforementioned Sectiou 239[ Very Truly Yxours, -Building Inspect~{r./ ~ Building Permits Only Date: '7',~ 0,/{~ 7 APPROVED / DISAPPROVED / APPROVAL WITHHELD to the Town/Village pursuant tO the General Municipal Law subject to the stated conditions: SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS CHARLES J. BARTHA, P.E., COMMISSIONER By: RICHARD J. LAVALLE, P.E. CHIEF ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE July 6, 2007 THOMAS ISLES, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Town of Southold Planning Bd. 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Atto: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan which has been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local deternUnation should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan SCTM No. Sparkling Pointe Vineyards NOTE: Does not constitute acc~l~tan~ 0f ~y zo~4) ~ociated therewith before any other local regnlatory board. .~..*-;~ .*~ ~x~ ~ APF:cc LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4IH FLOOR · P.O. BOX 6100 (631) 853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 S A M U E / S & S T E E L M A N June 11,2007 Mr. Bruno Semon Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Town of Southold, NY 11971 Re: Sparkling Point Vineya~s 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM # 1000-59-10-1 Sincerely, S/~u~ & Stee~.~ Architects Dear Mr. Semon, Enclosed, please find a completed LWRP Application; a check amoun~ for the balance of the Site Plan Approval fee, and the Full Environmental Form. If we can answer any questions or provide any additior)~t~j~OrmatiCin, please do hesitate to call. : ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEWYORK 11935 (631 ) 734-6405 FAX (631~ 734 6407 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Date: May 22, 2007 To: Architectural Review Committee From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer(~ Re: Re-visit agency referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXIV 280-131 Review Procedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concems, comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: The site plan status is a revised Active Site Plan received by the Planning Department on May 18, 2007. Below is site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq, ft. of production area on 12.088 acres parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48 approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-10-1 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan with a preliminary architectural plan, sp application and an aerial. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Samuels & Steelman dated May 16, 2007, aerial and site plan application. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODI-IOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southald, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 23, 2007 Suffolk County Planning Commission Mr. Andrew P. Freleng, AICP, Chief Planner PO Box 6100 H.Lee Dennison bldg., 4th Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC Dear Mr. Freleng, Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan is being referred to you for comments. Enclosed you will find a site plan, LWRP Form, site plan application, EAF and Southold Town Notice of Disapproval. This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq, ft. of production area on 12.088 acres parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48 approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-10-1 If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file/,O/t~ Enc, site plan, misc PLANNING BOARD MEMI]ERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 23, 2007 Southold Fire District Ms. Carol Miller PO Box 908 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC Dear Ms. Miller: Enclosed please find a site plan application, one (1) commercial site plan/survey, date received May 18, 2007 for the above referenced site. This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq, ft. of production area on 12.088 acres parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48 approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-10-1 The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Date: May 22, 2007 To: Mark Terry, Local Water Revitalization Program Coordinator From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC Status: Old revised Site Plan Application This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq, ft. of production area on 12.088 acres parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48 approximately 1,699 fi. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-10-1 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan, EAF, Notice of Disapprovals and be advised no LWRP form was submitted with the application. The applicant has been notified the LWRP form is required. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for LWRP consistency. Thank you in advance. cc: file [q/O Enc.: ¢g/q~pt-an 1o4 cpared-by ......... : . ~, 2997, e~ie! and site plan application, ~, E~ and site plan application. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 1197:i OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Date: May 23, 2007 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer~ From: Bruno Re: Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC Status: Old revised Site Plan Application This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. ft. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq, ft. of production area on 12.088 acres parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48 approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-10-1 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. Site plan enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. cc: file 00/0 Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Samuels & Steelman dated May 16, 2007 and site plan application. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Date: May 22, 2007 To: Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Southotd Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Public Works NYSDEC - Stony Brook -SPEDES Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Department of Energy & Environmental Division of Real Property Acquisition & Management From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewe Re: Agency Referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XX1V 280-131 Review Procedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concerns, comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: The site plan status is a revised Active Site Plan received by the Planning Department on May 18, 2007. Below is site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM#1000-59-10-1 Zone AC This site plan is for an alteration of an existing building into a new winery totaling 11,541 sq. ft. which includes 813 sq. ft. of office, 837 sq. ft. of retail, 4,170 sq. fi. of tasting room, 3,306 sq. ft. of storage area and 2,415 sq, ft. of production area on 12.088 acres parcel in the A-C Zone located on the south side of County Road 48 approximately 1,699 fi. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-I0-1 Attached is a copy of the revised site plan application for your review. Thank you in advance. ~xJoa~-cc: Fil.e., attachment. S A M U E L S & S T E E L M A N May 17, 2007 Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board Town of Southold 54375 Main Road Town of Southold, NY 11971 Re: Sparkling Point Vineyards 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM # 1000-59-10-1 Dear Ms. Woodhouse, I recently met with Bruno Semon and Amy Ford regarding our new design for Sparkling Pointe Vineyards. Bruno informed me that an application for Site Plan Approval had previously been submitted and that the Planning Board's file was still open. He suggested that we submit a new Site Plan Application, Letter of Authorization, and 6 copies of the Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations for a preliminary review with the Planning Board and outside agencies. Once we have received any comments and addressed any concerns, we will be providing additional information required for Site Plan Approval and will process any additional applications. If we can answer any questions or provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Samu/~ & Steelm/aTq Architects ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NEWYORK 11935 (631) 734 6405 FAX (631) 734-6407 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND May 4, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Ms. Nancy Steelman c/o Samuels and Steelman 25235 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Sparkling Point Vineyards 39750 County Road 48, Southold SCTM# 1000-59-10-1 Dear Ms. Steelman: It was nice to meet with you and discuss this project on May 3, 2007. This letter will act as follow-up to the items discussed at the meeting and to inform you of other requirements. Please be advised that the site plan application will be on hold and not processed until you submit the following: · Summary letter addressed to the Chairperson indicating the project scope change. · 6 copies of the new progress site plan for review and referral circulation. · New site plan application and agent authohzation letter for the file. Attached is a copy for your review. After receiving the above-referenced items, the following elements will need to be submitted to be fully processed: · Additional site plan fee for the difference of the new proposed building square footage. · New updated EAF long form for the proposed site plan. Attached is a copy for your review. · LWRP form. Attached is a copy for your review. · Materials required for presentation to the ARC. · Please refer to attachment for all other site plan required items. This is to notify you that the Planning Department will need to obtain the following approvals and or comments before the Planning Board can approve this site plan: SEQR, Suffolk County Planning Department, ARC, LWRP, Fire Department, Town Engineer and Southold Town Building Department. You are required to verify agency requirements, submit required agency documents and obtain approvals from the following: Town ZBA if required, NYS DEC SPEDES, SCDPW, SCDHS and SCWA. Please be advised that the last correspondence on this file was a letter to Stephen Mudd, dated April 25, 2005, indicating that we are in need of a revised site plan and the site plan application on file will.be placed on hold. Additionally, when the progress site plans are submitted, this application will be presented to the Planning Board and the Building Department for re-examination. Once the Planning Board has accepted the revised application and plans, they will be referred out. Enclosed you will find a site plan application and informational guide. If there are any questions, you can contact us at (631) 765-1938, ext. 5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer cc: file, Building Department, Town Engineer, Thomas P. Rosicki, Applicantt t.O/O 0-'44''-5. enc. Town of Southold - Proposed Site Plan Tax Map # 1000-59-10-1 - 5 ~005 Submission Without a Cover Letter Date: Comments: NOV 3 0 2006 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILY]N B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: B31 765-3136 April 25, 2005 Stephen Mudd 39005 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 CR 48, Southold, NY SCTM# 1000-59-10-1 Zone Ac Dear Mr. Mudd, In reviewing the revised site plan material dated April 5, 2005 submitted to this office, the Planning Board (PB) held a Work Session on April 18, 2005 and determine that this site plan is in need of revisions as submitted. The site plan must be revised to include the minimum Town Code requirements. Review the attached checklist and refer to the Town Code. Pending your revisions, the site plan application will be on hold with this department. Please submit a minimum of seven copies of the site plan at this time. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file SITE PLAN CHECKLIST MINIMUM SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS { } Notice of Disapproval from Building Department required under 100~253 of the Town Code. {v}/' Lot, 'block section from Suffolk County Tax Map. ~ Name and address of landowner on record. ~ Names and addresses of adjoining landowners. Names and address of applicant (if not same as landowner). { } Name and address of person preparing map (plan) sealed with license seal and signature. {, } Date of Plan. { } North Point. I~,- Location of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines. Key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet. / Existing zone district, adjoining property zone districts and zoning district lines if the property includes a split zone. {r.,,}/ Buildings and build out with percent lot coverage ( see bulk schedule of zone). {v}/- Landscaping and percent landscaped ( see bulk schedule of zone). {~/'" Scale, 1 inch equals 20 feet. { } Existing building structures / utilities and proposed structures/utilities. {~,/' Show all uses of the site in a town defined type, detail square feet and parking calculations broken down by the use, refer to Town Code section 100-190. Include handicap parking spaces as required in New York State Code. {~//' Drainage plan detailing paved areas inqluding sidewalks and parking areas with calculations. Show outdoor lighting with detail of wattage and type of fixture refer to 100-239.5. Show location of ground transformers, fire well and fire hydrants. Show location of dumpster. ~,~ ,~///~ ¢~, ~ Existing trees of 6 inches in diamet~'r'at a point 3 feet above the truck base property boundaries. Landscape plan detailing location of landscaping, type of material plants, buffering, street trees -see attached Town Code information 100-212 & 100-213. { } Data for architectural review (see information below) & refer to 100-257 & 100-258 { } Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing proposed use of floor area ADDITIONAL'REQUIREMENTS (If Applicable) ) {) () Off street loading areas as required, refer to Town Code 100-192 for Loading Berth Requirements. Existing contours with intervals of 2 feet or less Show wetlands Outdoor signs - sketch to scale and colors refer to 100-200/209 Proposed grading, including existing and proposed topography with 2 feet contours on site and 200 feet beyond the property line Spot elevations for buildings NOTE: YOU ARE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS: OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS (If Applicable) ~ Review required by Suffolk County Department of Health Services {} Review by New York State Depadment of Transportation (NYSDOT) for curb cut permit ( For Route 25) Review by Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) for curb cut permit ( For County Road 48) {} Review by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Storm water runoff permit (SPDES) for ground disturbance of 1 acre or greater. Review by Southold Town Trustees for dredging, bulkhead, wetlands, coastal hazard area Review required by Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Review required by Southold Town Board U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Bulkhead, dredging. Greenport Village Utility: Water if within village franchise area. ( Other Submission }Yithout a Cover Letter Sender: SCTM#:1000- 5'~'9 -/d' / Comments: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Cha/r RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 1, 2004 Stephen Mudd 39005 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan for Sparkling Pointe Vineyards 39750 CR 48, Southold, NY SCTM# 1000-59-10-1 Zone Ac Dear Mr. Mudd, This is to notify you of the status on the above described site plan. We received tl:,c Zoning Boards decision and are ready to refer out the site plan to start the proceds. At this time we need a complete site plan for review by the Planning Board. The.~pplication will be on hold until you submit a complete site plan. Please refer to the Town of Southold codes for required site plan document items. Please submit a minimum of seven copies of the site plan at this time. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE June 15, 2004 The ARC met at the Town Hall Conference room at 4:00 p.m. Members present were: Garrett Strang, co-chair Robert Brown, co-chair Herb Adler Herb Ernest Ron McGreevy Nick Planamento Also present'were Pat Moore, Robert Tast, and Mr. And Mrs. Lomangino for the Mattituck Riding Arena, and Mr. And Mrs. Rosicki for Albertson Marina. Moved by Herb Adler and seconded by Rob Brown it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of May 27, 2004. MATTITUCK RiDING ARENA (1150 Old Main Road Mattituck) It was RESOLVED by Rob Brown and seconded by Herb Adler that there is no objection by this Board to the use change or future expansion al proposed, provided the application goes through ail other appropriate channels. BEDELL CELLARS ADDITION It was RESOLVED by Garrett Strang and/~conded by Herb Ernest the APPROVE the APPLICATION as submitted, SUBJECT to the new exterior light fixtures matching the existing. ALBERTSON MARINA The APPLICATION was TABLED. SPARKLING POINT LLC. WINERY E ~ - l{2) - ~ It was RESOLVED and APPROVED that as a pre-existing structure, there is no objection by this Board to the proposed use change. SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AND PLANING BOARD ~r We the under signed objecL to any zone change or variance be granted to the owners or representatives of the property located at 3975 Cty.Rd.48;CTM 59-10-1. This property for many years a shrub,flower, tree farm which falls under the zone Agricultural- Nursery code. A winery, metal storage bldg. and retail office and large parking area will change the character of the area and cause a depreciation of our property. The Town of Southold has spent considerable time and money addressing the existing the codes and usage of all the property on Cty.Rd. 48 and therefor no change should occur. Name Address dUN 08/17/2004 13:03 F^X Jun ~.4 04 04~30p NU ~IHEYRRDS 2004 ~ Pom~ tLC C/o Roslcki, Rosie, ki & .~,socia~ One Old CounU7 Road Suite 493 Cra'lc ~ I~P[ 11514 ~002/002 p.~ I~B: ~mml R.e~ew Co,,,~ittcc ~ 6/15/04 SCTM fl: Address: S~ Poim~., LLC 1000-039-010-001 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 Attached you wiU find five pic~m~ ~b~ depict fl~e four sides offs ctmeea m ~m above pmcel oflnoPe~. T'hgre followin~ ~plies for tim ArchiMcmra/Rovicw Commi~,Me: 1. Sidb~ will r'M~s;-- thc ~me._ on all four sides m~d will cominue m Roi~nr es it is in 3. CamtralairconditimJingwill h~rclybeplacodoutsideofl~be Wmt~/deof~he buUdln~ sad will be ~ f~rm~ vlcw ~ l~g ~*~&ds 4. We arc avn~ tha~ w~ will nevi to make ~he current bathroom ~lRy nocc~iblc and if it mqui~s any ,aa~ pip~ vc~n~.~ it wiU be to ~ South s/dc of the Please call nm at if anY addiltonal info~i-adion is needed and tlmak you in advsnc~ for Five (3) phomlg~s of ex/sting builfllnc ~ FO~ NO. 3 TOWN OFSOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Thomas Rosick~(Sp~kling ~oint LLC) 1 Old Country ~ Carle Place, NY 11514 DATE: March 17, 2004 Please take notice that your application dated March 11, 2004 For permit to convert an existing nursery building & office to a winery at Location of property 39750 County Road 48, Southold County Tax Map No. 1000- Section 59 Block 10 Lot 1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this conforming 11.5 acre lot in the AC District, is not permitted pursuant to Article III 100-33, A. 4, which states; "(c) The winery structures shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from a maior road." The existing structure is located 67 feet from County Road 48. In addition to a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, the project requires approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. CC: file, ZBA, Planning Board Damon Rallis Permit Examiner Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. C E IV E ":, II111 17 ~04 ~ Plannln~ Itoa~ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer Lydia A. Tortora Vincent Orlando James Dinizio, Jr. http://southoldtown.northfork.netBOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATII MEETING OF JUNE 3, 2004 ZBA g,5520 - SPARKLING POINTE, LLC by THOMAS ROSICKI Property Location: 39750 C.R. 48, Southold; CTM 59-10-1 Zone District: Agricultural-Conservation NC Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 119714)959 Tel. (631) 765-1809 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 12-acre lot has 564.88 feet along the south side of County Road 48, a/k/a North Road, in Southold. The property is improved with agricultural buildings as shown on the December 19, 2002 survey prepared by Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's March 17, 2004, Notice of Disapproval, citing Code Section 100-31A.4 in its denial of a building permit application regarding applicant's plan to convert the existing building use from agricultural-nursery to agricultural-winery for the reason that the existing building is less than 100 feet from the front lot line along County Road 48. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public headng on this application on May 20, 2004, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests the continued agricultural use of an existing building located 67 feet and 80.8 feet at its closest points to the front line along C.R. 48. The building was built in 1999 and has been used as a nursery office and storage areas related to the agricultural (nursery) use of the land. The applicant is proposing a winery within the building which is a permitted agricultural use in this A/C Zone. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the relief requested will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant is not proposing to increase the structure in any way. The appearance of the current plantings that parallel County Road 48 create a visual effect of a much larger setback than the 67 feet that exists. These plantings and the Page 2 - June 3, 2004 Appl. No. 5520 - Sparking Pointe LLC/Rosicki CTM 59-10-11 at Southold existing building will remain, in place. The plantings will be continuously maintained as a landscape buffer. 2. The benefit sobght by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The applicant is using the existing structure on this agricultural site, and the structure has been used as an office and storage for the nursery's activities. 3. The variance granted herein is substantial, however, the building will remain in place. The reduction of the current code requirement is 33 feet, for a 67 ft. setback instead of a 100 ft. setback from the front property line. 4. The difficulty was self-created when the applicant acquired the building in a nonconforming location. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a vadance in this community of single-family residences will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of this relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a different agricultural use (winery), while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Dinizio, and duly carded, to GRANT the vadanca as applied for, as shown on the December 19, 2002 survey prepared by Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr., L.S., with the CONDITION that the existing trees and shrubs, be maintained at a minimum average height of 4' as a landscape buffer, as exists, between the building and CR 48. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject prOperty that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Odando, Goehdnger, Tortora, and Dinizio. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-0). Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 618/04 Approved for Filing PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: May 18, 2004 To: From: Re: Zoning Board of Appeals Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, ChairM~'~~fudd, Appeal # 5520 for Rosicki/S. Sparkling Pointe, LLC 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY SCTM: 1000-59-10-1 Zone: AC In response to your request for comments, the Planning Board (PB) reviewed the afore noted appeal at its May 17, 2004 work session and determined the following: 1. The PB is currently reviewing a site plan application dated May 3, 2004. 2. This application will require the following before approval from the PB: Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Suffolk County Department of Public Works, Southold (S.) Building Inspector certification, S. Town Engineers, S. Fire District and Architectural Review Committee. 2. The parking as proposed will require a landscape strip and buffer along County Road 48. 3. The PB has no objections to granting relief on the front yard setback because this site contains an existing building. We hope these comments will be useful to the ZBA in its review of this appeal. Thank you in advance. Cc: file, pb APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer Lydia A. Tortora Vincent Orlando James Dinizio Southold Town Hall ~.~.~_ P.O, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1809 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 http://southoldtown.northfork,net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Board Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Appea May 10, 2004 Request for Comments MAY 1 1 2n04 I S0uth0[d Town The ZBA is reviewing the following applications for a May 20, 2004 public hearing. Enclosed is the Notice of Disapproval and ZBA application. The Planning Board may be involved regarding a pre-submission review under the site plan regulations of the Zoning Code. The file is available for review at your convenience· NAME TAX # / ZBA BD NOD VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE DATEIS LAST REVISED ROSlCKI I S. 59-10-1 5520 3/17/04 CONVERT 12/19/02, S. ISAKSON, MUDD AC NURSERY TO SURVEYOR WINERY - CR 48 SETBACK Your comments are appreciated. Thank you. FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Thomas Rosicki (Sparkling Point LLC) 1 Old Country Road . Carlo Place, NY 11514 Please take notice that your application dated March 11,2004 For permit to convert an existing nursery building & office to a winery at Location of property 39750 County Road 48, Southold County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 59 Block 10 Lot 1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed conslamcfion on this conforming 11.5 acre lot in the AC District, is not permittexl pursuant to Article m 100-3[, A. 4, which states; "(c) The winery structures shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from a major road." The existing structure is located 67 feet fi:om County Road 48. In addition to a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, the project requires approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. CC: file, ZBA. Planning Board ~ ~_ Permit Examiner Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the abo~e referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN B OF APPEALS ROSlCKI, T / SPARKLING PT LLC 5520 VO CONVERT NURSERY BUS. TO WINERY 39750 CR 48 SHLD 59-10-1 AC FYSB Parcel Location: House No.. Street Hamlet SCTM 1000 Section O~ Block 10 Lot(s) O01 Lot Size I~.OgS Zone District 1 (WE) APPE3tL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR VA D: Telephone: 51 ' NOTE: If applicant Is ~ol Ihe ~wner, nme II appllcanl Is owner's a/Iorney~ agelll, archi/eel, builder, contract vendee~ etc. Au~orizedUepresentative: ~feO~en ~. ~ I Please specify who you wish correspondence tO be mailed to, from the above listed names: D ApplicanCOwner(s) ~Authorized Representative D Other~ ' . ' FOR:~E~BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED ~ Other: D Building Permit. O Certificate of Occupancy D Pre-Certificate o~ D Change of Use 13 Permit for As-Built Construction RECEIVED 2 s Zoo4 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by num. bors. Do not quote the code. ArticleI~ Section 100~ ~ 1 Subsection__~__~ Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: )8~A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map, U A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. D InterpretaUon of the Town Code, Article Section 13 Reversal or Other A prior appeal [] hasle/has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal ~o. Year.... . Part A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (Extra sheO attachment) Disapproval for variance was issued on 03/17/04 and referenced Article I~I 10~, A.4 relating to winery structure setbacks. (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER ot~ifli~.~'_.~A~[.~ neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted because: The appearance of the current plantings that parallel County Road 48 create a visual effect that seem to have a much larger setback than the sixty-seven foot (67') minimum that is currently there. These plantings also create a good buffer as required by the current zoning regulations. (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to purse, other than an area variance, because: It would be cost prohibitive to move the existing structure. The only other alternative would be to tear the existing structure down and rebuild to meet the code, versus granting a variance to keep the existing structure in place. (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The current plantings and buffer area that parallel County Road 48 give the appearance of a one hundred foot (100') setback. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: There will be no changes to the existing structure, and we will not be going any closer to County Road 48 than what currently exists on the property now. (5) See original sheet for answers. (6) Additional information about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirements: a) Southold Town issued permits for exist'rog structure and parking based on agricultural and retail sales use. b) Current zoning does not allow for the existing sixty-seven foot (67') setback for a winery. It would be cost prohibitive to move the exist'mg structure back to meet the current Southold Town zoning requirements. March 25, 2004 Variance Submission for SCTM# 1000-059-10-001 - Fact Sheet Attachment Owners Name: Property Address: Contact: Address: Thomas P. Rosicki (Sparkling Pointe, LLC) 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 Stephen D. Mudd 39005 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 631-765-1248 Phone 631-765-9495 Fax RECEIVED MAR 2 6 7_004 'ONING BOAEI~ OF APPEAL~ Lot Size: Building Size: 12.088 acres, 526,560 sq. t~. 2,689 sq. ft. total - breakout per space listed below Tinee Business Uses Combined per 100.91 for A-C zoning parking requirements: Office/Business: Retail Store or Shop: Warehouse/Storage: Total Parking Req'd: Min. Parking Stalls Req'd: 2 for 150 sq.ft. Min. Parking Stalls Req'd: 3 or 573 sq.ft. Min. Parking Stalls Req'd: 2 For 1,969 sq.ft. 7 Stalls minimum, one of which must meet ADA Act Standards Current Gravel Pkg.: Approximately 2,625 sq. ft., which is approximately 0.5% of total lot size. Proposed Main Parking Area: Approximately 6,060 sq. ft.. The current parking combined with the additional proposed parking will be comprised of the following: Twenty (20) parking stalls ten feet (10') wide by twenty feet (20') long, and includes one (1) eight foot (8') wide by twenty (20') foot long ADA stall with a five foot (5') wide by twenty foot (20') long unloading area. This stall meets the Federal ADA Act requirements that specify the need for one ( 1 ) ADA parking stall for parking lots that have between one (1) and twenty-five (25) stalls. The ADA stall will be the closest stall to the office/retail building for required ease of access. The parking area and ail stalls will be covered in gravel with spots being indicated by concrete park stops, except for the ADA stall and unloading area which will be black top pavement. The parking area already has one catch basin in place, and will have drainage for the expanded parking area because of slope of the lot toward the southeastern part of the lot. This is in the opposite direction of County Road 48, so there will be no soil rtmoffto the road. Proposed Overflow Parking Area: Approximately 4,000 sq. ff. The proposed overflow parking area will comprised of the following: Twelve (12) parking stalls ten feet (10') wide by twenty feet (20') long. Buffers: The north side of the parking area, that parallels Cotmty Road 48, has assorted plantings of trees and shrubs with an average height of five feet (5') by an average width of four feet (4') already in place. This buffer seems to meet current zoning requirements for those properties located across County Road 48. The eastern side of the parking area has a treeline composed of six foot (6') Juniper trees already in place. This buffer seems to meet the current zoning requirements for those properties that border that side and rear property lines. COIJN~ ~ ~/l~/~;.'q. 10Fr''IcE BLE~. MON GRAVEL pARKING ZONING EO~ARD O; APP- RECEIVED MAR ?, 6 2_004 ~ZONING I~OARD OF APPEALS Applicant(s): PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Please include with Z.B.A. Applicatiol]) I. Ifbuildingisexistingandalterations/additions/renovationsareproposed: A. Please give the dimensio~ and ovdrall square footage of extensions beyond existing building: Dimensions/size: , tla Square footage: Iv/p4s' B. Please give the dimensions and square footage of new proposed foundation areas which do not extend beyond the existing building: Dimensions/size: Square footage: IV[ Fa Il. If land is vacant: Please give dimensions and overall square footage of new construction: Dimension/size: Square footage: Height:. IlL Purpose and use of new construction requested in this application: IV. Additional information about the surrounding contours or nearby buildings that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): V. Please sub~t seven (7) photos/sets after sta~ng comers of the proposed new construction. 7/02 Please note: Further changes, after submitting the above information, must be placed in writing and may require a new Notice of Disapproval to show changes to the initial plans. If additional time is needed, please contact our office, or plec~e check with Building Department (765-I802) or Appeals Department (765-1809) if you are not sure. Thank you. QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION Is tho subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? D Yes /~No RECEIVEO MAR 2 6 2004 Arc there .an), proposals to change or alter land contours? D Yes ~No 1) Arc there any areas that contain wetland g~asses? ~ 0 2) Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with this application? ~J 0 - 3) Is the property bulk headed b~tween the wetlands area and the upland building area? 4) If your pmp~fo/~ontains w~Nlands or pond areas, have you conta,~a~ the office of thc Town Tmste, os for its d~tormination of jurisdiction? ~J 0.A]/~. Is there a depression or sloping ~?ation near the area 'of pro~posed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? A]/~ (If not applicable, state "n/a".) Are there any patios, concrete baniers, bulkheads or fences 11~ exist and are not shown on tho survey map that you are submitting? /qgN~ (If none exist, please stat~ Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your pre. arises? If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department. If none, please state. APPEALS Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? /q 0 If yes, plonse explain where or submit copies of deeds. Please list preaent use or operations conducted at this parcel · S+oc, k and proposod uso ~lJincv~//¥1ncva/r'~_ AuthOrized Signature and Date APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town et: Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The puroose of this form is to orovide information, which can alert thc Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is neeessary to avoid same. YOURNAME: ~O.~lGki, Th m s (.se, r} l;n. (Last name, first hame, middle initial, unless you are applying in the nan~e of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance X Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other If "Other", name the activity: '- MAR ~ ~ 2004 ZONING BOY~~ ~F APPE,'~L~ Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO ~. . If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town qf Southold: Title or position of that person: ~/I Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling,'parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock -t~ of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Print Name:f~l~mat ~. gOSfC.~ March 25, 2004 Variance Submission for SCTM# 1000-059-10-001 - Fact Sheet Attachment Owners Name: Property Address: Thomas P. Rosicki (Sparkling Pointe, LLC) 39750 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 Contact: Address: Stephen D. Mudd 39005 County Road 48 Southold, NY 11971 631-765-1248 Phone 631-765-9495 Fax Lot Size: Building Size: 12.088 acres, 526,560 sq. ft. 2,689 sq. ft. total - breakout per space listed below Three Business Uses Combined per 100.91 for A-C zoning parking requirements: Office/Business: Retail Store or Shop: Warehouse/Storage: Total Parking Req'd: Min. Parking Stalls Req'd: 2~ for 150 sq.ft. Min. Parking Stalls Req'd: or 573 sq.ft. ~'~ q~ Min. Parking Stalls Req'd: 2 For 1,969 sq.ft. 7 Stalls minimum, one of which must meet ADA Act Standards Current Gravel Pkg.: Approximately 2,625 sq. fi., which is approximately 0.5% of total lot size. Proposed Main Parking Area: Approximately 6,060 sq. ft.. The current parking combined with the additional proposed parking will be comprised of the following: Twenty (20) parking stalls ten feet (10') wide by twenty feet (20') long, and includes one (1) eight foot (8') wide by twenty (20') foot long ADA stall with a five foot (5') wide by twenty foot (20') long unloading area. This stall meets the Federal ADA Act requirements that specify the need for one (1) ADA parking stall for parking lots that have between one (1) and twenty-five (25) stalls. The ADA stall will be the closest stall to the office/retail building for required ease of access. The parking area and all stalls will be covered in gravel with spots being indicated by concrete park stops, except for the ADA stall and unloading area which will be black top pavement. The parking area already has one catch basin in place, and will have drainage for the expanded parking area because of slope of the lot toward the southeastera part of the lot. This is in the opposite direction of County Road 48, so there will be no soil mnoffto the roM. Proposed Overflow Parking Area: Approximately 4,000 sq. ft. The proposed overflow parking area will comprised of the following: Twelve (12) parking stalls ten feet (10') wide by twenty feet (20') long. Buffers: The north side of the parking area, that parallels County Road 48, has assorted plantings of trees and shrubs with an average height of five feet (5') by an average width of four feet (4') already in place. This buffer seems to meet current zoning requirements for those properties located across County Road 48. The eastern side of the parking area has a treeline composed of six foot (6') Juniper trees already in place. This buffer seems to meet the current zoning requirements for those properties that border that side and rear property lines. COIJNT' SIGN I ~FFE~ UON I~RofoseD over pl.-ov~ 0 METAL OFFICE 0 GRAVEL pARKING F"o~ m ~?~ - 5 20 5 FOUND CONC. UON. 4 0704D DZUGAS-SMffH REPUTED OWNER FOUND RR MON. PROPERTY CORNER (RAIL DRIVEN VERTICALLY) SURVEYED: 19 DECEMBER 2002 SCALE 1"= BO' AREA = 526,55g,7g S.~ OR 12.088 ACRES SURVEYED BY STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR. P.O. BOX 294 NEW SUFFOLK. N.Y. 1195~F~ 6£CD'F- 6 FZ/'O R ~YS Lio /N~ 49273/ 02R1201 VILLAGE OF GREENPORT FOUND PLANTED NURSERY ~ J-'*'CONC, MON. STOCK 96,8L N/F HUBBARD FOUND £ 0.8' DZUGAS- SMITH REPUTED OWNER MAR ~ § ZUU~- ~Z~NG BOARD OF APPEALS SURVEYED:' 19 DECEMBER 2002 SCALE 1"= 60' AREA = 526,559.79 S.R OR 12.088 ACRES FOUND CONC. MON. VILLAGE OF' GREENPORT ¢o xP PLANTED CO~T¥ C*rCH GRAVEL PARKING UON i POL¥ GREENHOUSES (l~Pql I SURVEY OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY SITUATE SOUTHOLD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. SURVEYED FOR: CORI LAN(; KAREN LANG GUARANTEED TO: CORI LANG KAREN LANG RAYMOND AKSCIN SAFE HARBOR TITLE AGENCY, LTD. TM# 1000-059-10-001 RECEIVED MAR ~ 6 2004 ~.ONING~ B__O~ARD OF APPEALS N/F HUBBARD FORM NO. 3 TOWN OFSOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: March 17, 2004 TO: Thomas Rosicki (Sparkling Point LLC) 1 Old Country Road Carle Place, NY 11514 Please take notice that your application dated March 11, 2004 For permit to convert an existing nursery building & office to a winery at Location of property 39750 County Road 48, Southold County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 59 Block 10 Lot 1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this conforming 11.5 acre lot in the AC District, is not permitted pursuant to Article III 100-33, A. 4., which states; "(c) The wine~ ~tmctures ~hall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from a major road." / The existing structm(e is located 67 feet from County Road 48. In addition to a variance from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, the project requires approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. CC: file, ZBA, Planning Board -"~-- -~--------~---~~~ Damon Rallis Permit Examiner Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. 17 2004 Southold Town Ploflnifl~ Boar4 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE Date: Name: .~/./~,.~,/~0 Telephone: 7~-/~-~'0c- Mailing Address: .~- SCTM# of site you are inquiring about: ,.5"~./o ./ Query: (Please be specific about the information you need. Provide supporting documentation - surveys, maps, sketches - where possible.) For Office Use Only: Routed to: LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Approved Project Type: Site Plans Status: Final - Pending Inspection SCTM #: 1000- 59.-10-1 Proiect Name: Sparkling Pointe Winery Address: 39750 County Road 48 Hamlet: Southold Applicant Name: Thomas P. Rosicki, Sparkling Pointe, LLC Owner Name: Thomas P. Rosicki, Sparkling Pointe Zone 1:' A-C Approval Date: 9/11/2007 SCANNED OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 11/20/2007 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: located on the south side of County Road 48 approximately 1,699 ft. west of Tucker Lane known as 39750 County Road 48 in Southold. SCTM#(s) 1000-59.-10-1 SC Filing Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Aqreement: SCAN Date: -- J,,'t ENTP-,.'r' AND EXIT N 25' 4 F~e~, tYtO UPLI~HTD% PEf~ DI¢N~ NEY'I DI~N AT IDtalVE~IA¥ EN'r'P, IED LEi i~f~D ON A LICHT C, ONTP,,ADTIN~ OOL OP--,, BAC. K---,.~P--,OUND~ No TH ENTf~h" ONLY OIL BLUECTONE I0 ~PA~E5 GONDTt~,UGTION OF GUP.~ DI~N \/ ~TONE GLIt~IBIN~, TYPIC, AL PAt~,.<.I ND OIL AND BLU=~TONE TCJI~I=AGIN~ ON A~PHALT I~ ~PAGI~ DP-,.IVEP4A¥ TO BE C, LODED, P,,ElviO'v"E DP,.IVEP, IAY' PAVEMENT R. EPLAOE }filtH TOPDOIL AND LAI,'~N & t~t HI~,H FENC'~ /; ~ITH Pi~IVAG¥ PAt~K-..IN¢ Oil ANI~ ., ]:.]-',: ~ BLU~TONE ', ' ' .~JFk~A~IN~ ON A~PHALT ~TOHE CUR~IN~ 'J"~ICAh LU O GR. LJDHINC-~'LOAPlN~ "/'B II U PAV~Iv~NT -I~. HETAi f~AILIN~ ~ 20' [ = W- ~ ~1~= YA~ ~ ~. NOTE= DEE DHEET #D, FOt~. OVERALL DI'f'E PLAN PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" [] 20'-0" PARKING CALCULATIONS RETAIL AREA 037 SFI200 SFISPACE OFFICE AREA 613 SFll00 SFISPACE TASTING ROOM 41 ?0 SFI200 SFISPACE STORAGE AREA 3306 SFI10~0SFISPACE PRODUCTION AREA 2415 SFIS00 SFISPACE TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 4.1 SPACES 8.1 SPACES 20.8 SPACES 3.3 SPACES 4.6 SPACES 4t .1 OR 41 SPACES 41 SPACES W/2 H.C LOCATION MAP APPROVED BY ..... ¢. ,, 'c , ~) yoers ~om tho date, ofai~proval SCTM # PROPERTY: ADDRESS OWNER: SITE: ZONING: SURVEYOR: BUILDING: AREA LOT: COVERAGE PARKING: LANDSCAPING: 486,813 SQ FT I 1000-59-10-1 39750 CR 48 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 THOMAS P. ROSICKI CYNTHIA ROSICKI (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) 526,560 SQ. FT. = 12.088 AC A-C STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR PO BOX 294 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11966 LICENSE # 49273 DATED 18 AUGUST 2006 TOTAL: 17,1896Q. FT. WINERY (foot print): 7,662 SQ. FT. CRUSH PAD: 2,885 SCI. FT. OUTDOOR TERRACES: 6,642 SQ. FT. 3.3% ACTUAL I 20% MAX. ALLOWABLE 22,558 SQ FT / 4.3 % LOT COVERAGE 92.5 % LOT COVERAGE TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION 'NO: 061t DRAWN BY: NS & UT NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEETNO: 1 ~ REVISED: 6LEA~ AT TH~ GO~L~TION ~TO~ ~t ex EL 3S.03 ~ ~ ' ~ ~m P~JE~T x ~ e~L 3~.62 ~ ~& 35,09 I ~ ' ~--~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J J -- ' A~V~ ~ ~' ~ ' . ~ / I I ~ ~ '/ ~ o~ _--. ~ ~,.~ ~ I ~ mia x 4 D (ST) J ~ J ~ I L OLD' OVERALL ¢1 t b PLAN ,._., E~AN¢ION POOL TEST HOLE .~,,,~,c.o.,~. SITE DATA I ~ GEOSClENCE . . I NO SCALE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 SCTM ~ 1000-59 10 1 I SCALE: 1" = 30'~" ~~~"'A~-- __.... TEST HOLE DATA, ( 5/29/07) . J' SHEET TITLE: 1~ D~K BROWN SIL~ LOAM OL PROPERS. 397~ CR ~ IAL SITE PLAN ,...,s, SOUTHOLD. NY11971 3 FT, BROWN SlE~ S~D SM OWNER: THOMAS P. ROSICKI SITE ~L~. ] ~U u CYNTHIA ROSlCKI (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) / UTILITIES PALE BROWN FINE SP - TO MEDIUM SAND SITE: .526,560 Se. ~. - ~2.0SS ~C J PLAN ZONING. A-C / 21 ~. SURVEYOR: STANLEY J, ISAKSEN, JR J PO BOX 294 j SHEET NO: NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION SCDHS SUBMISSlONI ~ REVISIONS: ~ 7130107 I 8115107 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: SANITARY CALCULATIONS ZONING I 8/30/0? ROOF AREA OF NEW WINERY I. ALLOWABLE DENSITY ZONING AC I DRY,W,.,E,I.L AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR TOTAL ACERAGE: 2.0t9 ACRES (NON PLANTED VINEYARD) (DW) A . 7,8~7,7SF. X 121.1,2FT.) X ¶.82'I,313CU. FT. HYDROGEOLOGICAL ZONE: ZONE IV FARM SEE ENLARGED SlTE /~ LB USE. (2) 8, DIAMETER x 5, HIGH POOLS WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER --------. PLAN SHE =_T #1 ~ ZONING 6 8 DIAMETER x 4 HIGH POOLS ' I Acres x 600 GPD - 1 206 GPD I 8' )~ 10' STORM DRAIN RING -- 422.5 CU. FT. ALLOWABLE DENSITY. 2.0 0 .- , 61 8' X 4' STORM DRAIN RING = 1~0t3.4 CU. FT. SITE DENSITY CALCULATION F~M RESIDENCE ~ ~ . AC '1,435.9 CU. FT. WINERY: ~ J~O.~JD~.D- ~ 1. TASTING ROOM (8 GPDIOccupant} ENC~ PARKING AREAS TOR 2 OFFICE SPACE 10.06 GPD/SF) DRY,W,,E. LL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFFFAC ' 0.06GPDX804SF =48.26PD ~ ~ ~ ~ I / USE:(2) !0DIAMETERx7 HIGHPOOL 0.04GPDXS,203SF=208.1GPD ~ ~ ~--~ . - (~ -- -- ~--~ {2)'10'.X._7. STORMDRAINRINO= 9$8CU. FT. 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPDISF) /' ~ -~/'~"-~-'~~ NORTH ROAD C, oUN7~ mob ~ ~ REQUIRED 0.03 GPD X 979 SF = 29.4 GPD 958 CU. FT. > 878 CU. FT. DRY ,W,,,E. LL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR TOTAL SITE DENSITY FLOW = 7'40.7 GPD , ~/ /'~~"~'~''//"'~-~-'~------~['~/'-'~~' "~ J/ surmu~ cout, rn, ~-~ __ L_..~ ~ (DW) C 4,152SF. X (2112.F,T.) X 0.9=623CU. FT. PROJECT NOT OVER DENSITY / r~~...._.~__.~_ ~'~ ~"~'~ ~ I~.,/ I VACANT ~ .~_~ USE:(1) 8'DIAMETERx6 HIGHPOOL [ ~~~~u.~,., ~ ) // ~, ii/ .~ USE: ~2, 6' D,AMETE. x9 .,G..OOL .......... ._. / ~/L~"~?~ ~~ ~._,..,~~~ ~ 11) 8' X 6' STORM DRA N R NG = 253 CU. FT. II. EANItAK¥ Ut=5 ~ ~"~ ~ ~ ~ · ' '~' ~ / 111111, 929 CU. FT. > 623 CU. FT. 7,5 GPD X 9'1 Occupants = 682.5 GPD D.~,W,.~,~L AREA X RAI.FALL X RU.OFFFACTOR 2. OF.CESPACEp.06GP=SF) "- ~"~ USE: ~21 ,0' D,AME.rE. x ?' ,,O. PO_O.~ ..... 3. W,, VgO...".U~'~O.Na?..0~ %"0D~.~F}.D 12) '10' X 7' STORM DRAIN RING = sau ~u. r'/. ,, .............. - - .P_BO3/IDED REQUIRED 4, RETAIL (0,03 GPDISF) Z lNG - ~ 058 CU. FT, > 862 CU. FT. 0.03 GPD X 979 SF = 29.4 GPD ~.~l~t ~ L ~ - , I , \ '~'L~ [ I I I I I I uNP~k'r~ ~R~- 2.0m D.Y.W..~,~L A.EA XRAI.FALL X .U.OFFFACTOR SEWAGEFLOW--909.~GPD (DW) E _.5.,320S,F,. X (21'12F,T,.) X 0.9=798CU. FT. TOTAL SITE SEWAGEFLOW=968.2GPD I ~ ~ h .'T~' / I I '. NJJIJ I[I] I~m~m-~~FFI SAN,TA.YSYSTEM.EOU,REMEN'rS ~ // ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ I! / ~.]11111il1111[11111 ][]11111111 o~ ~. =. > 798 CU. FT ~.SEPTIC TANK (ST): 968.2 GPD x 2 DAY FLOW = 1,936.4 GAL ~ Z O ~,~,o,~.s~o,..RA,,.,,o~ .,~cu... ~.~c,,,~,oo~s~,~.,..~,,.~.,.,o,.-~.~s.~. m m B B ./ ~,~°~m~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~.,oo,.~.~I ~ REQUIRED USE MINIMUM ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X 9 ~. HT.) ~ ~ / ~ su~ --u~ ~ ~A ~ ~ ~ ~ P~ ~ ' I 1094CU.~, > t068CU. FT. EFFECTI~DEPTH(3-8FT.~IA, X8.67FT. HT.)=650.25S.F. I ~ / ~ L wA~R~ I1~ ~ ~rSTINe III. WASTE WATER PROCESSING ~ / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ,~ .~,~=.~.~. ~.~...~..o.uc.,o.~.~ ~ II/ ~ ~ ~ FF ~b ~.~ ~ /~ I' HI~. 2 H~. WASH DOWN OF ~NE MAKING EQUIPMEN.r 395 GPD I/~ ~T. L ,/~"~,J, I I TOP O~ POOL WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: ~ /I ~H~_I~.... ~1 ~oOL I 1.SETTLEMENT TANK: 395 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOWt = 790 GAL / //I / ~ _ ~-~ / / I ~E ~4/ I TAN~ I ~1 I~o~P~L (1) I,200GALSE~LEMENTTANK(STL)(8FTIDIAx4FTLD) I I / '/I /- , ~ / / / / ':"C- ...,. ...... ~.~EAc.,,~,oo~s~.~,.,,.~.*...~ ~~ ~ / ~':/~~ ~ = ~ , ' ' = USE ~0 ~ DIA x 10 FT HT POOL (LP). WASTE WATER PROFILE FOR WlNERY PLUS~%~PANS,ON(,XP):,0~TD,Ax,0--HT ~ ~~ ~:~ / ./' // SYSTEM ~2, NO SCALE ~ ~ ' / / / I I ~ ~ I~ / / / ~ ~o~ ~ .0,, / APPR~VE~ Bv I FP EL ~4.0 , ~ ....... ,o' ~E~.SFT. , ~ ~~, ~ . I .. - E_ ,, I_ _, SITE ......... PLA / SEPTIC PROFILE FOR WINERY SYSTEM ~1, NO SCALE INLET TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL SEPTIC SYSTEM SEPTIC TANK - 2000 GALLON N.T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM GREASE TRAP ..T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL WASTE WATER SYSTEM o oh SETTLEMENT TANK - 12oo GALLON N.T.S. WASTE WATER SYSTEM TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION SCDHS SUBMISSION IDATE:A4'SuC-r 7, zc~cq SCALE: 1" = t00'-0" SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN DETAILS :ALCULATION.~ SHEET NO: 3 LAI~N LAhlN · C e, A · · A * " C · *' A *' * C * ,I/',IALL MOUN i EO PLOOPLI~,HT~,, PIALL MOUN i tE~ ~AMP ilCHT¢, I~l~l CF, BE~A 2g,:20P, I,~IALL MOUN~ ~0 ~ I EP LI&HTG, ~IN 64% l!~A GEILIN¢ MOUNTEZ2 POPIN LIGHTS, ~oi~ BEeA 1224~60, q,~O LUHI~NE~ · O · e Ae FAC, ADE UPLICHTS, ~ t~.EE UPLICHT~, LA~N '" a · C 51~,N UPLICHT¢, BE&A LUMEN5 FACADE UP LAPIN DU~ TILL I0 F~,,I, LIgHtS, I~Y~ TILL IO PlVl, PAql.E.e. Ay LI~HT~, l~OJfl, - BE~A 21'~, BE~A 1224.,~ ON ~ Rr=GUIRI~7 LAV~N PARTIAL SITE LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION iii 0 I --'il CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE _ANDSCAPIN( & LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NO: I~ETAI/ ~T~ O O O TA~TIN~ TA~TIN~ R, OOM MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE:: 118" = 1'-0" OFPIGE CON~L~REN~E OPEN TO Pt;~OI~UC, TION E~LOI~ C4~JJe, H I Ni~/I_oA~ I NG AREA E~I..OI~ I-' --~PPROV~D BY~ PLANNING BOARD TOWN O~ SOUTHOLD DATJ~ I/ i~t/b7 TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: SHEET TITLE: MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO: 5 DI..AID ON GI~'~DtD AIDOVE /IEBI~A~¥ R. IZ21DLIN~ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN TOIleT SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" GI~,,I~H I NiG,/J_OA~ I N~ AI~,EA T()W~ OF $OLJTHOLD DATE TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION OI .-II CHECKED BY: NS DATE: AUGUST 7,2007 SCALE: SHEET ~TLE: LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NO: 6 .... .... III I I ~ I I I I I I NEW ADDITION NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'4)" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118"= 1'-0" APPRO,/',,::D ~Y PI..ANH~NG BOARD TO\~q~l OF S©UTHOLD MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH ROOF: ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES LEAD COATED COPPER AT CURVED WINDOWS WIINDOWS/DOORS: ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS TRIM/CASING PAINTED WOOD TRIM CHIMNEY/TERRACE WALLS: DRY LAID STONE TERRACES: RANDOM BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM PAINTED WOOD RAILING AT HC RAMP CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: TYPE 5A -WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION mi CHECKED BY: NS DATE: AUGUST ?, 2007 SCALE: 110"=1'-0" SHEET TITLE: NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS SHEET NO: 7 EXISTING BUILDING WITH NEW ENTRY .t NEW ADDITION WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 118"= 1'-0" CRUSHING PAD BELOW RAMP BELOW EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8' = 1'4)" APPROVED ,~*. PLANNIHG BOAP. D TOWN OF $OUTHOLD DATE MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH ROOF: ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES LEAD COATED COPPER AT CURVED WINDOWS WIINDOWS/DOORS: ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS TRIM/CASING PAINTED WOOD TRIM CHIMNEY/TERRACE WALLS: DRY LAID STONE TERRACES: RANDOM BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM AT CRUSHING PAD PAINTED WOOD RAILING AT HC RAMP CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: TYPE 5A -WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION u. II I-I OI .-II PROJECT NO: 0611 DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS ~ATE: AUGUST 7, 2007 SCALE: tl8"=1 '~" SHEET TITLE: WEST & EAST ELEVATIONS SHEET NO: 8 '~E~ ENTFLh" AND EXIT N ~r=JN ~I~N 25' TI, NO UPLI~HT5% Pr=R 51¢N~ ,Po'/,f~te Nr=IN ~I&N AT DRIVr=I, NA¥' EN] t'~.IE5 N© ..TH ON A LIGHT GONTRA~TIN~ ~OLOR ~AC, K.~ROUND 5 ONLY GoUNT'r' 48 'IN~5 ON GOUN'I'¥ ROI^I 5Ut~,.Jr:C,T TO APPROVAL GONE;,TRUC, TION OF C, URE~ OIL AND ~LUESTON~ ON ASPHALT STONE~UR/~IN~TYPI~AL PAVr=Nir=NT Rr=PLA~r= Y~ITN TOPSOIL AN~ LA~NN ~ PT HI~.H FENC. E ~ A~UND DLIt,~Fs'r'E~ PARK, I N~ OIL ANI~ E~Ut~AGIN~ ON ,~PH.~T · ~TONE GURE. IN~ TYPIGAL MECHANIC,,N. E~UIPPIENT C..~JJSHINE "LOADINe Al C~N~R~'~ PAVEHENT N~TAL I~AILIN5 NOTr=: .~r=r= 5Hr=ET #E, FOR OVr=RALL 5ITE PLAN PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: '1" = 20'-0" PARKING CALCULATIONS RETAIL AREA 837 $F/200 SFISPACE OFFICE AREA 813 SFII00 SFISPACE TASTING ROOM 4t70 SFI200 SFISPACE STORAGE AREA 3306 SFII000SF/SPACE PRODUCTION AREA 2415 SFIS00SFISPACE TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 4.1 SPACES B.l SPACES 20.8 SPACES 3.3 SPACES 4.8 SPACES 4t.t OR 41 SPACES 4t SPACES W/2 H.C LOCATION MAP SCTM # PROPERTY: ADDRESS OWNER: SITE: ZONING: SURVEYOR: BUILDING: AREA 1000-59-104 39750 CR 48 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 THOMAS P. ROSICKI CYNTHIA ROSICKI (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) 526,560 SQ. FT. = 12.088 AC A-C STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR PO BOX 294 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 LICENSE # 49273 DATED 18 AUGUST 2006 TOTAL: t7~189 SQ. FT. WINERY (foot print): 7,662 SQ. FT. CRUSH PAD: 2,885 SQ. FT. OUTDOOR TERRACES: 6,642 SQ. FT. 3.3% ACTUAL I 20% MAX. ALLOWABLE LOT: COVERAGE PARKING: 22,558 SQ FT ! 4.3 % LOT COVERAGE LANDSCAPING: 486,813 SQ FT I 92.5 % LOT COVERAGE TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION U.II -II 0611 DRAWN BY: NS & UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEET NO: 1 '-""" : N.O TH P-..OAP ooUNTY P-..OAP 48 37.73 ~- EXIGTIN¢ OATC, H BAGIN, ALL \ 36.42 / ~I~E ~ TO BE / GLEA~D AT t~ ¢O~LETION / OF ~ON~GTION OF ~ TIP-~ ~ ~1~ OIL A~ ~9 + ~ ~ ~ * TAN~, EXIT / ...~ ~ ¢ 20' MIN. ~ r DIA x (fiT) B~IN / I ' I (B) ¢ DIA. X q '. HT. ~J GTO~ ' ~ (LP) pA~II~ / (.,I~UoHIN¢/LOADIN~ .PITGH ~+ ex ' ~ : I [~L? .-. (I) I~oo 6AL, ~ FT DIA x 4 FT L~ (~l) ~ * I (I) IO PT DIA x lO FT HT (LP) NO~: ,,. S-., '--' LE~HIN~ POOL O~RALL 511 ~ PLAN ,._. E~A~ION POOL EL 33.3 ex EL 33.3 PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" [] 20'-0" TEST HOLE NO SCALE TEST HOLE DATA (1512gl07) 1FT. DARK BROWIN SILTY LOAM OL 3 FT. BROWN SILT~ SAND SM PALE BROWlN FINE SP TO MEDIUM ~SAND 21 FT. BY MARK McDONALD GEOSCIENCE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 1197t SITE DATA SCTM # 1000-59-10-1 PROPERTY: ADDRESS OWNER: SITE: ZONING: 39750 C R 48 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 THOMAS P. ROSICKI CYNTHIA ROSICKI (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) 526,560 SQ. FT. = 12.088 AC A-C SURVEYOR: STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR PO BOX 294 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 LICENSE # 49273 DATED 18 AUGUST 2006 TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION SCDHS SUBMISSION REVISED: 7~30~07 8115107 8/30/07 iii --II DATE:~LI~uL"T '~,~ SCALE: 1" = 30'~"' SHEET TITLE: SITE UTILITIES PLAN SHEETNO: REVISIONS: 7/30107 81t$107 8/30/07 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: SANITARY CALCULATIONS ZONING ROOF AREA OF NEW WINERY I. ALLOWABLE D N ITY ZONING AC DRY ~,LL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR TOTAL ACERAGE: 2.0'10 AC.R. ES (NON PLANTED VINEYARD) (DW) A 7,6776F. X (21~2FT.) X '1.0=t,3'13CU. FT. HYDROGEOLOG~CALZONE. ZONE~V .^.M SEE ENLARGED SITE ~ LB USE: (2)6 8'8, DIAMETERDiAMETER Xx 5,4 HIGHH GH POOLSpooLs WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC. WATER ~ PLAN SHEET #1 ~ ZONING {1) 8' ~ 10' STORM DRAIN RING = 422.5 CU, FT, ALLOWABLE DENSITY. 2.010 Acres x 600 GPD. = 1,206 GPD. 16) 8' X 4' STORM DRAIN RING = 1,013.4 CU. FT. SITE DENSITY CALCULATION AC ~ 4 Ag= ~ ,~,, =* . ~ 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPDlOccupant) ~ ~ ~ · , .... ~,u. r.. '- ', ......... 5 GPD X 91 Occu ants = 455 GPD ~ ~ / PARKING AREAS ........... 2 OFFICE SPACE (0,06 G~P~IsF) ~ ~ ~ -- ~-- DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOI'I' I'AC;/UI~ ' n n= ~_r~n v on~ ec = .~o '~ (owl"E" .5,852 SF. x 12{12 ? x0.9 -- 8?8 cu. ~. 3. w,.;;~o"~u~.~;~:0~ ~7i;~';~~ ~ (2) 10' X7' STORM D~IN RING = 958 CU FT. ' ..........' ....- ~ n~u ~ 0 03 GPD X 979 SF = 29 4 GPD 958 CU. FT. > 878 CU. FT. ' ' USE: (1)8' OIAMETER x6 HIGH POOL ~ ,~ ~ , LB ~ V/~~ / ~} ~. ~ . ..~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ I USE: (2).8' D AMETER x 8 HIGH POOL ..... IGN 14t R' Y R RT~RM ~RAIN RING = 253 CU. FT. II. SANITARY [~;' ~ a' ~+&~a a~i~ ~i~&= a76 cu. ~. SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: ~ ~ ~I~ iI / ~ / [ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 929 CU. FT. WINERY: 929 CU. FT. > 623 CU. FT. 7.5 GPD X 9~ Occupants = 682.5 GPD s' I ZONINGAc p~.~L AREA X ~INFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPDISF) [u..l u 5,7~ SF. X (2112 FT.) X 0.9 = 862 CU. FT. 0,06 GPD X 804 SF = ~.2 GPD VAC~T ~*~~'~'~P~cU. FT 3'WIN~~~0~0~F~PD ~ / / I llr /l lliYlll]l llli[ , , ~ REQUIRED 4, RETAIL (0,0~ GPDISF} ZO lNG · ~ ~ ~ ~ 958CU. FT. > 862CU.~. 0.03GPDXg79SF=2g.4GPD ~ U~I[[ ILIIIil /.~.~,o~o, DRYWalL AREA X ~INFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR SEWAGE FLOW = 9~.~GPD ~ ~ ~L~I ]~ ~ uae~ ~- 2.0m ~CR~ m~ ~ ~ -- / ~ ~ I ~ / I ~ . ~ ~~ ~ ~o..~.,~/ (DW)E 5,320 SF. X(2112 FT.) X 0.9 = 198 CU. ~. TOTAL 8lTL SEWAGE FLOW~ ,t) 10.'X 12, STORM D.IN RING = 82t CU. FT. SEPTIC SYSTEM - 968.2 GPD ~ ' Z~N,NG ; '~ 'X M '' '~ ~ ~ ~.SEPT~C TA.K (ST)= ,..2 GPD x 2 .A~ ,LOW = ~,,36.~ GAL ~ ~ 821 CU. FT. > ALi9. ~U. ~NOFF FACTOR USE MINIMUM: 2,000 GAL SEPTIC TANK (10 FT DIA x 4 'T LD) ~ ~~~1 DRY ~LusE:~2)AREA ~0' DIAMETER x 8' HIGH PooLX RAINF - ~~:T~:~;;; ~ S F.IGPD 6~58F ~ ~ LI/ ~,......~ /: ..... ' (2) 10 X8 STORM D~IN RING=~ ~'094 CU. FT. ~.L=A~.,.~ .U~ [USE MINIMUM (3 8 FT.'DIA. X 9 FT. HT.)'= <11 ~ .~, ~.. o, ~ ~ ~..~0 - ,o.D. ~. 1094CU. FT. > J0686U, FT. EFFECTIVEDEPTH(3-8FT. DIA. X8.67FT. HT.)=6~.25S.F. I ~ ~ ' ~ ~ .~_~.. I ~ ~ ~lST~ ~ ~ [~ III.WASTE WATER PROCESSING I r ~ , / I~ ~ / ~ ~ / / ~ I~ PF EL ~.o ~ /~ [ Ml~. 2 M~. WASH DOWN OF WINE MAKING EQUIPMENT 395 GPD . I I I I~ ~ I I TOTAL WASTE WATER PROCESSING 395 GPD f/~T. [ rL ,~,,~tI TO"O~OOL WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: -- ~ I ] / ~ L ~ ~ / , I ~ ~ ~ /I ~L~ ~ ...... ~' ~A~HIN~I ~l.O FT. WASTE WATER SYSTEM - 395 GPD ~ ,E +~64/I TAN~ J~,e. +~o.14 71 ~oo~ I I.SETTLEMENTTANK:39SGPDx2OAYSFLOW =7gOGAL I r t / / ' ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ fo' · ~ HI~ 2.L~CHING POOLS 395 GPD 11.5 SF / GPD = 263 SF _ -I I~ -I USE 10 FT DIA x 10 FT HT POOL (LP} ~ I ~ ~/ -- ~ ~ ~ / - - ~ I I EFFECTIVE DEPTH (10 FT. DIA. X 9.67 FT. HT.) = 303.6 S.F. ~ ~ ~ =o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . / V~A~Tt~ ~ ~ ZONING .... RY PLUSS0%EXPA"SION(EXP): t0FTOIAxIOFTHT ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~/ / / Ii AC WASTE WATER PROFILE FOR WINE ~ ~ -. ~ / / ~ , I FA~ SYSTEM ~2, NO SCALE ~ ~ ~ , / ~ . [ I ~ooo-sa-~o-~a / / / SITE PLAN zo.,.AC ~ zo;~~.....~ ,~%~C~.' ' ~L~ " /'/ / o~. · -- ~uu~ ~oF~ ~O~ ~. ~ vi I ~ / SEPTIC PROFILE FORWINERY ~ ~ ~ l S~STEM ~..O SCALE ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ / DATE:A~b~T · ~l~ ~ ~ SCALE: 1" = 100"~" i ~ I I :~1 ~1 I I ~ ~ :~. , . / OVE~LL I '~~ ~~ ~ ~ _H ~ ~ .' ' "-: ~ I I II I I IT~%~ ~, ~ .... . ~ / DETAILS I I I I ..... I I I I ~1'~1' I . [ I;~ [ l lll~ " .,.~ / - "' ;.? '1 / / ~ I ~ I1~'~1 I '~ ~1 III I~- . ~,,- 8ALCU~TIONS / ~PICALsEPTicLEACHINGsYsTEMPOOL DETAIL ~PTIC TANK - 2ooo GALLON ~E ' ~PICAL..T.S. LEACHING POOL DETAIL SETTLEMENT..T.S. ~~TANK - 12oo GALLOIN ... SE,,CS S.E.'" SC..S SUB.,SS,O. WASTE WATER SYSTEM TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSIONI LA~IN · C · · A · DRIVEHAY BOILAt~J:2 L.I~HT~, '/O1% ID~-'~A ~-~'"/HH, DI~N UPLI~HtD, ~ ~A ~OD, I1~O MJb-N5 LA~IN I~ALKPIAY LI6HTS, 501% D.,~.G~A 21'~, 550 ~ I~ALL HOUN] ~D 5 ~ EP L I GHT5, PAt~KING A~EA LI~HTO, CEILING, I,,IOLJN ~OI~IN LIGHTS, ~Oln~ D.!D~A FAGA~I= UPLIG, HTS, 'T'R. EE UPLI~HTD, !F~Dlnl, E~c~A '/~1~, qSO L.UHEN...G LA~N PA~A~ UP CEll. IH C~ILIN~ ON A.G i, ql% LA~N PARTIAL SITE LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION REVISED September 6, 2007 LU O IAI. PROJECTNO: 0611 DRAWN BY: NS & UT :HECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" iHEET TITLE: SITE ANDSCAPIN( & LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NO: TO RETAIL 0 0 0 0 0 TO PA~IN~ TA~TIN~ MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" OFFIC,~= AI~EA OPEN TO PI~O~UGTION B~LO~ ~RL~41N~//OADIN~ A~J~A E~/O~ TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION I.UI D~ BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 118"=?-0" SHEET TITLE: MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEW NO: 5 ~LAB ON ~t~.AD~' AtDOV~ TI~A~I= I~IPPLIN~ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" C, IRLI~41N&/L. OAPlN~ At~EA E"d. TAN~ IN~, TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION I.U O DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: AUGUST 7, 2007 SHEET TITLE: LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEETNO: 6 --1 i~11 ,, / N~ ADDITION / JXIJTI~ NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: t/8" [] 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'~)" MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH ROOF: ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES LEAD COATED COPPER AT CURVED WINDOWS WIINDOWS/DOORS: ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS TRIM/CASING PAINTED WOOD TRIM CHIMNEY/TERRACE WALLS: DRY LAID STONE TERRACES: RANDOM SLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM PAINTED WOOD RAILING AT HC RAMP CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: TYPE 5A -WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION LU Zl -JI CHECKED BY: NS DATE: AUGUST ?, 2007 SCALE: ,118,.=,1 o.0,, SHEET TITLE: NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS SHEET NO: 7 EXISTING BUILDING WITH NEW ENTRY NEW ADDITION WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"= 1'-0" CRUSHING PAD BELOW I RAMP BELOW EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH ROOF: ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES LEAD COATED COPPER AT CURVED WINDOWS WIINDOWS/DOORS: ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS TRIM/CASING PAINTED WOOD TRIM CHIMNEY/TERRACE WALLS: DRY LAID STONE TERRACES: RANDOM BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM AT CRUSHING PAD PAINTED WOOD RAILING AT HC RAMP CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: TYPE 5A -WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION UJI OI w.J.~ ~o DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: AUGUST ~ 2007 SCALE: 11~'=1'~" SHEET TITLE: WEST & EAST ELEVATIONS 8HEETNO: 8 TI~IO LJPLIGHT5% PER 51GN~ NEtN 51~N AT Dt;..IVEI, NA'r' EN'Ft~IE5 qEIAI ENT~"r' AND EXIT N i / 25' LEi ~l--p.,5 ON A LIGHT CONTRASTING 0 66/ NO -.,TH ENTt~"r' DNL'Y' NEI~i C_.,oUNTY t::2--0A 2 48 ON COUN"Pt' SUD, JEC.,T TO APPP-.OVAL OONSTI;.UCTION OP C, UI;~ID OIL AND ~LL~STON~ ON ADPHALT GLOSBD, t~.EI'.'IO'¢t= PAVt=Mt=NT ~EPLA,C..,E PilTH TOPSOIL AND LA,INN /- IO~,ATION 0 5TON~ OJI~DIN~ TYPIC, AL PA~K. ING OIL AND BLUESTONE ON .,'Is,..GPHALT 20 ,.,G'PAC, E5 I0 5PA~E5 I0 5TONE C,!,,it~IN~ Th"PIC. AL Gt;.USHING AF GONGI~'T'E PAV~HENT NOTE, SGE SHEET #3 OVERALL 51ii: PLAN PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" PARKING CALCULATIONS RETAIL AREA 637 SFI200 6FISPACE OFFICE AREA 013 SFII00 SFISPACE TASTING ROOM 4170 SFI200 SFISPACE STORAGE AREA 3306 SFIIOOOSFISPACE PRODUCTION AREA 24t5 SFI5000FISPACE TOTAL P ARY~NG SPACES REQUIRED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 4.1 SPACES 8.1 SPACES 20.8 SPACES 3.3 SPACES 4.8 SPACES 4t .1 OR 41 SPACES 41 SPACES WI2 H.C LOCATION MIAP SCTM # PROPERTY: ADDRESS OWNER: SITE: ZONING: SURVEYOR: BUILDING: AREA 1000-59-10-1 39750 CR 49 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 THOMAS P. ROSICKI CYNTHIA ROSICKI (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) 526,560 SQ. FT. = 12.088 AC A-C STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR PO BOX 294 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 LICENSE # 49273 DATED 18 AUGUST 2006 TOTAL: t7,189 SQ. FT. WINERY (foot print): 7,662 SQ. FT. CRUSH PAD: 2,885 SQ. FT. OUTDOOR TERRACES: 6,642 SQ. FT. 3.3% ACTUAL I 20% MAX. ALLOWABLE LOT: COVERAGE PARKING: 22,558 SQ FT ! 4.3 % LOT COVERAGE LANDSCAPING: 486,813 SQ FT I 92.5 % LOT COVERAGE TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION >o DATE: August 7, 2007 iCALE: 1 "' = 30"-0" SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEET NO: 1 HIgH [ 32.09 EXISTINE~ CATGH ~A~IN, ALL DRAINAGE ~11;~JC, TU~E5 TO iSE CLEA~ AT THE COt~PIEl'lON OF C, ON~Tle~TION OF THE GoU TY 35.33 · 35.09 VALVE PAt~KIN~ PiJ~IlC, P~'T'EF~ LINE EL 37.73 HIgH lINE ~ LP ) (I) 1,2.00 ~,AL, b FT DIA x ~ ~ HT (~TL) ~._/ ,E~I=rLEHENT TANK (I.) lO FT DIA x lO FT HT LE~HIN~ POOl NOTE= SEE SHEET ~D FOR. OVERALL 51'1'~ PLAN EL 33.3 PARTIAL SITE PLAN ~ALE: 1" = 20'-0" TEST H 0/1: "* M~,,.DO,ALD '' ----~- GEOSClENCE NO SCALE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 TEST HOLE DATA (5~29~07) 1 FT. DARK BROWN SILTY LOAM OL 3 FT.I BROWN SILTY SAND SM PALE BROWN FINE SP TO MEDIUM SAND TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION LU _Zl 9 CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" ;HEET TITLE: SITE UTILITIES PLAN SHEET NO: 2 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: SANITARY CALCULATIONS ZONIRG ~F AREA OF NEWWINERY I. ALLOW BLE DE"S' AC -- AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR TOTAL ACERAGE: 2.010 ACRES (NON PLANTED VINEYARD) ZONING (DW) A ?,8.7,7SF. X (21.t,2FT.) X 1.0=I,313CU. FT. HYDROGEOLOG!CALZONE:ZONEW F^"" SEE ENLARGED SITE ~ LB USE: (2) 8 DIAMETER x 5, HIGH POOLS WATER SUPPLY. PUBLIC WATER PLAN SHEET (6) ,8' DIAMETERx4 HIGH POOLS (1) 8 X 1,0 STORM DRAIN RING = 422.5 CU. FT. ALLOWABLE: 2.010 Acres x 600 GPD. = 1,206 GPD. ZONING (6) 8 X 4 STORM DRAIN RING = t~013.4 CU. FT. TOTAL SITE SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: 1,206 GPD. '1,435.9 CU. FT. FARM AC RESIDENCE ~ II. SANITARY DESIGN 1,435.9 CU. FT. > ~ SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: ~~---~REA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR WINERY: (DW) B $,852 SF. X (2/t2 FT ) X 0.9 - 878 CU. FT. t. TASTING ROOM (5 GPD + 2~5 GPD/Occupant) ~~-"'~ ~ .. -~-- USE:,(2) !0 DIAMETERx7'HIGH POOL · 7.$GPD X 72 Occupants = 540 GPD (2) 10 X 7 STORM DRAIN RING = 958 CU. FT. 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPDISF) 958 CU. FT. > 878 CU. FT. 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPDISF) DRY,W,,.E,,LL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR 0.04GPDXS,203SF=208.1GPD u<cou ~ -- ' USE: (1) 8' DIAMETER x 6, HIGH POOL 0.03 GPD X 979 SF = 29.4 GPD USE~ ~2~.8' D.AMETE.,,8 .,G. POOL SEWAGEFLOW =.01..GPD (1) 8, X 6, STORM DRAIN RING = 203 CU. FT. TOTAL SITE SEWAGE FLOW = 801.7 GPD ~J~O_V_IDED. REQUIRED SEPTIC SYSTEM 80t:7 GPD ~" ] / ZONING D.Y.W..~.LL A.EA X RA,.FALL X RU.OFFFACTOR USEM...MUM. 2.800GA.,:SEPT.CTA"'~IOFTD'Ax5FT"'~ ~"~-~~~ / I I' AC DRY ~L AREA X ~INFALL, X RUNOFF FACTOR III. WASTE WATER PROCESSING (J) 10 X J2 STORM D~IN RING = 82~ CU. FT. TOTAL WASTEWATER PROCESSING 395 GPD ~ REQUIRED WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: ~ 82, CU. FT. > 798 CU. FT. WASTE WATER SYSTE~ - 395 GPD ;EA xx (DW) FUSE:7'121SF.~2) ~O' DIAMETERX (~t2 F~.)X 8 HIGHX POOL0'9 = t068 CU. FT. 1.SETTLEMENT TANK. 395 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 790 GAL (2) 10 X 8 STORM DRAIN RING = 1094 CU. FT. 2.L~CHING POOLS 395 GPD 1 t.5 SF I GPD = 263 SF ~ ~ USE 10 FT DIA x t0 FT HT POOL (LP) ~ ~/ ~ SU~,~U~ ~ ~ ~ OF L~ ~ P~ .N~O 10,078 ~R~ 1094 CU. FT. > 1068 CU, FT. EFFECTIVE DEPTH ( 2-10 ~. DIA. X 9,67 FT. HT.) = 303.6 S.F. // SEPTIC PROFILE FOR WINERY SYSTEM #t, NO SCALE TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL ZONING AC FARM 1000-59-10-6.3 TUCKER LN WASTE WATER PROFILE FOR WINERY ,~ SYSTEM ~2, NO SCALE zo.m~ / m = SCALe. SEPTIC TANK - 2000 GALLON ..T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM SEPTIC SYSTEM t0 / / / / / GREASE TRAP N.T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL WASTE WATER SYSTEM SEPTIC TANK - 1200 GALLON N.T.S. WASTE WATER SYSTEM TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: t" = t00'~" ;HEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN DETAILS :ALCULATION~ SHEET NO: 3 L. AI~N LA~N ~LL MOWN] I-~ PLOO~/I~,HT~, I0,00o ~ I,",IALL HOUN ~ ED RAI,,tP LI~,HTS, I~PI GF, DE~,A 1,250 LUIvlEN~ __! o C · - A · A · 51~N UPLIIS, HTS, I100 J~ . A * HALL. MOUNTED LI~HTO, ~IIN ~.F, BEeA "')~1~, D"')5 LUt,4EN~ PAI~K.I~ AF~EA LIGHTS, ~Aoo LUI,,IEN5 .¥. C, EILIN~ MOUNTED POHN ligHTS, ~01~ BE~A 12°4/~0, qgO LUHEN~ · C ,. 'Ac I=AGADE Ut='LI~,HTS, I ieEE UPLIE~HI'5, q5o I.UHEI~ LA~N TOmE ~1~, IBE~A '/~1~ C, EILIN~ DOYJ, I kl~"11'~, ~01~1, 5-r"E~ Llet.ll~, BB~A ~IISP /-- C,l~lkll~l~ ~ ~ LI~HT~, ~ · lff:~A 1,22.~ ON ~ Rr=~UIRE~ LAHN PARTIAL SITE LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION ~LU. ~ CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SHEET TITLE: SITE LANDSCAPIN( & LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NO: 4 s'rot~ ~ TO PAtRt¢.IN~ e"rot.~ ~ ~TO RETAIL TA~TIN~ TA~TIN~ ~00~ MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE:: 1/8" = 1'-0" OPFIC. E AR.IDA oPEN TO PRODUC, TION. E~LOPI C..tRUD, HIN~/LOADq N~ At~EA E~L-OPI TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION n~ 0 ~AIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 5 OLA~ ON ~R,A~ ALCOVE HEC. H TIf;.A~E ~IDOLIN~ LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = t'-0" TOILET TANI'~ A~ I~AIeJeJEL ~ FEI~'fENlI1ATION AREA C~RDE:,I'-II N~//OAD I N~ A~A TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION O CHECKEDBY: NS DATE: AUGUST 7, 2007 SCALE: SHEET ~TLE: LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEETNO: 6 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: tl8" = SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = t'-0" MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH ROOF: ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES LEAD COATED COPPER AT CURVED WINDOWS WIINDOWS/DOORS: ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS TRIM/CASING PAINTED WOOD TRIM CHIMNEY/TERRACE WALLS: DRY LAID STONE TERRACES: RANDOM BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM PAINTED WOOD RAILING AT HC RAMP CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: TYPE 5A -WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION O DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: NS DATE: AUGUST 7, 2007 SCALE: 118"=1'.0" SHEET TITLE: NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS SHEET NO: 7 TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION EXISTING BUILDING WITH NEW ENTRY NEW ADDITION WEST ELEVATION SCALE: tl8" = 1'-0" CRUSHING PAD BELOW RAMP BELOW EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"[]1'-0" MATERIAL LEGEND EXTERIOR WALLS: SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH ROOF: ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES LEAD COATED COPPER AT CURVED WINDOWS WIINDOWS/DOORS: ALUMINUM CLAD WINDOWS TRIM/CASING PAINTED WOOD TRIM CHIMNEY/TERRACE WALLS: DRY LAID STONE TERRACES: RANDOM BLUE STONE RAILINGS: COLOR COATED ALUMINUM AT CRUSHING PAD PAINTED WOOD RAILING AT HC RAMP CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: TYPE 5A - WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTION TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION Zl --II SHEET TffLE: WEST & EAST ELEVATIONS SHEET NO: 8 NC)~.TH ~OA~ ~,oUNTY ~.OA~ 4-~ ENTt~Y L~ ONLY ~ ENLARGED SITE PLAN DESIGN SCALE: 1 "' [] 30'-0" SITE DATA . -- , PROPERTY: 39750 CR 48 ~1 ADDRESS SOUTHOLD,"V .97~ / I OW.E.:[...O~P..o. gc~,~K, ~1 · (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) I SITE· 526,560 SQ, FT. = 12.088 ACRES I Zo...G: ^-c I SURVEYOR: STANLEYJ. ISAKSEN, JR PO BOX 294 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 LICENSE # 49273 DATED 18 AUGUST 2006 LOCATION MAP PARKING CALCULATIONS RETAIL AREA OFFICE AREA TASTING ROOM STORAGE AREA PRODUCTION AREA 837 S FI200 SFISPACE 813 SFI100 SFISPACE 4170 SFI200 SFISPACE 3306 SFI1000SFISPACE 2415 SFI500 SF/SPACE TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 4.1 SPACES 8.1 SPACES 20.8 SPACES 3.3 SPACES 4.6 SPACES 41,1 OR 41 SPACES 41 SPACES WI2 H.C PROGRESS PRINTS DATE: MAY 16, 2007 LU O PROJECT NO: 0641 DRAWN BY: NS & UT CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: 1" = 30"0" SHEET TITLE: SCHEMATIC DESIGN SITE PLAN SHEET NO: 1 RETAIl- © 0 © © T~TIN~ Fb~OH 'TO PA'I~.t(.I N~ EN'l~'r' GOUF~T"r'ARD II II II Ot=I=IGI= AREA BALCONY O~t::N TO PF~UGTION ~=LO~ GJJP. JJ.~4-II N~A..OAiI~ J N~ AREA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 118~" = 1'-0" PROGRESS PRINTS DATE: MAY 16, 2007 PROJECTNO: 0611 DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: SHEET TITLE: SCHEMATIC DESIGN MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEETNO: 2 HEC. H X tNIN~ TOILET TIt~k~E R.I~LIN~ FI=RM~N'I"ATION At~EA J LOWER~ LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" ,C,,t~.J~4'l N,~/'L.oA.~ I N~ AREA N~ PROGRESS PRINTS DATE: MAY 16, 2007 I.U O PROJECT NO: 0611 DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: 118.=1,.0. SHEET TITLE: SCHEMATIC DESIGN LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEETNO: 3 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = 1'-0" PROGRESS PRINTSI DATE: MAY 2007 ILl PROJECT NO: 0611 DRAWN BY: NS CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: 118"=1'-0" SHEET TITLE: SCHEMATII DESIGN BUILDING ELEVATION~ SHEET NO: 4 FOUND CONC, VILLAGE OF GREENPORT FOUND MON PLANTED NURSERY STOCK POLY GREENHOUSES I I E 96.8 SURVEY DF DESCRIBED PROPERTY SITUATE SOUTHOLD, TO~N OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. SURVEYED FOR: COR/ LANG KAREN LANG GUARANTEED TO: CORI LANG KAREN LANG RAYMOND ARSCIN SAFE HARBOR TITLE AGENCY, LTD, 1000-059-10-001 N/F HUBBARD DZUGAS-SMITN REPUTED OWNER SCALE I"= 60' AREA = 526,559,7g S,F. OR 12,088 ACRES SURVEYED BY STANLEY d. ISAKSEN, JR. P.O. BOX 294 NEW SUFFOL/(. N.Y. 1195~ ~YS Lic. ;No. 49275~ 02R120 NORTH ROAD COUNTY R~AD 48 _~ ~ ....... I I I I ? / / / / ? I / / ~GVILLAGE OFI REENPORT r ~ / SITF PLAN SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" ~ DZUGAS- SMITH REPUTED HUBBARD / / OWNER / / / / / ? / / / 1 / ~)RAWN BY: 3Y: DATE: SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" SHEET TITLE: SHEET NO: NORTH ROAD COUNTY ROAD 48 VfLLAGE OF GREENPORT PLANTED VINEYARD WITH IRRIGATION AND ELECTRIC FACILITIES PANEL PLANTED VINEYARD WITH IRRIGATION AND ELECTRIC FOUND CONC, MON POLEo FACILITIES DESCRIBED PROPERTY' SOUTHOLD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. SURVEYED FOR: SPARKLING POINTE GUARANTEED TO: SPARKLING POrNTE TM# 1000 059-10-o01 HUBBARD NOTE DZUGAB SMITH REPUTED OWNER SURVEYED BY STANLEY d. ISAI<SEN, JR P.O. BOX 294 NEW BUFFOLK. NY. 11956 651-754-5855 LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR NYS bc No 49275 05R1527R2 ~ REVISED: ~ EXISTING CATCH DAGIA ALL J ~ In Advance, / J~'~ T / ' ' POLE~ / CLEA~D AT T~ ~ ,,, m-,--', '-."~ m F ~ d, m, l/"< {/ / ~ ~ ~ ~---'~' I ~LE ~ I / mm ~ + m ~L~ r / / , ~ ~STE ~ATE~ ~TE~ N~: ,- ~',, --' LEA~HINe POOL 5El 5NEET ~2 FOE ~nluiTInil IIl~B[PTifl~~[~lll~E~ ~ gP ~ (I) lo PT DIA x IO ~ HT (E~) I ~ L .._. E~ANglON POOL PARTIAL SITE PLAN !~ndards, relating to water supply and sewage disposal. Regardless of any' omissions, i~',sfal~ci~ or l~ of ~t~], ~t~ion i8 ~d ~ ~ in ~co~ ~ ~e at~ched ~t ~ndi~ons ~d app~c~le s~d~$ ~Js s~c~ wSvcd by the Dopant. ~s app~ expires 8 years fi~m the ~ Approval Date SCALE: 1" [] 20'-0" TEST HOLE NO SCALE TEST HOLE DATA (5/29107) BY MARK McDONALD GEOSCIENCE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 1FT. DARK BROWN SILTY LOAM eL 3 FT. BROWN SILTY SAND SM PALE BROWN FINE SP TO MEDIUM SAND 21 FT OCT I 8 2007 SITE DATA SCTM # 1000-59-10-1 PROPERTY: ADDRESS OWNER: SITE: ZONING: 39750 CR 48 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 THOMAS P. ROSICKI CYNTHIA ROSICKI (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) 526,560 SQ. FT. = 12.088 AC A-C SURVEYOR: STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR PO BOX 294 NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 LICENSE # 49273 DATED 18 AUGUST 2006 CHECKED BY: NS DATE: 7/18/07 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE UTILITIES PLAN SHEET NO: WASTE WATER PROFILE FOR WINERY DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: SANITARY CALCULATIONS ROOF AREA OF NEW WINERY I. ALLOWABLE DENSITY DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR TOTAL ACERAGE: 2.010 AC.R. ES (NON PLANTED VINEYARD) ZONING (DWI "A" 7.8.7.7. SF. X(2/12 FT.) X 1.0 = t,313 CU. FT. HYDROGEOLOGICAL ZO"E. ZO"E'V zo.,.G AC USE: (2) 8 DIAMETER x 5' HIGH POOLS FARM SEE ENLARGED SITE [6) 8' DIAMETEEx 4' HIGH POOLS WATER SUPPLY: PUBUC WATER ~ LB .l~ (1) 8' X 10' STORM DRAIN RING = 422.5 CU. FT. ALLOWABLE DENSITY: 2.010 Acres x 600 GPD. = 1,;206 GPD. ~ PLAN SHEET #J (6) 8' X 4' STORM DRAIN RING = 1,013.4 CU. FT. SITE DENSITY CALCULATION . t,435.9 CU. FT. ZONING E 1,435 9 CU. FT. > ~ WINERY: F~ SUreNESS ~D PARKING AREAS ' 5 GPD X 91 Occupants - 455 GPD ~-' ~ ~ ~o RESIDENCE ~REA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPDISF) (DW)"B" 5,852SF. X (2/12FT.) X 0.9=878CU. FT. O.06GPDXS04SF =48.2GPD ~ ~ ' USE: (2) 10 DIAMETER x 7' HIGH POOL 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPD/SF) (2) I0' X 7' STORM DRAIN RING = 958CU. FT. 0.04GPDXS,203SF=208JGPD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EED_VJDED_ REQUIRED 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPDISF) ~ ~ ~ ~. 958 CU. FT. > 878 CU. FT. 0.03 GPD X 979 SF = 29.4 GPD DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR TOTAL SITE DENSITY FLOW = 740.7 GPD / NO~TH t~OA~ ~ USE: (1) 0' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL PROJECT NOT OVER DENSITY Z~NING su~-ou< coute7 USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER x 8' HIGH POOL VACANT f COUNTY ROAD ~ } (I)8'X6'STORMDRAINRING= 253CU. FT. II. SANITARY DESIGN RUEINESEI /LB F ,A.E~ //C (2) 8' X E' STORM DRAIN RING =~676CU'FT' SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW:wiNERy: USOENCE / ~*~ ~"-"~---~*~ ~X ~{~fJDED. REQUIRED 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPD + 2.5 GPD/Occupant) 929 CU. FT. > 623 CU. FT. 7.5 GPD X 91 Occupant~ = 682.5 GPD ' n.YWELL A.EA X RA,,FALL X ,U,OFFFACTO. 2. OFF,CESPACE(O. OOGPDISF) : // // ZO,,,G (DW),,o,, 6,746SF. X (2/,2FT.) X 0.9=862CU. FT. 9.06GPOXS04SF = .2GPD - / 1/ USE: (2) 10' DIAMETER x 7' NIGH POOL 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPD/SF) (2) t0' X 7' STORM DRAIN RING = 958 CU. FT. 0.04 GPD X 5,203 SF = 208.1 GPD ~ ~ ~ // // ~1~ REQUIRED 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPD/SF, ~ ~ i ~ Z;~G 958 CU. FT. > 862 CU. FT. _ 0.03 GPD X 979 SF = 29.4 GPD ~ looo-59-Io-2 DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR ~EWAGE FLOW = 968.42GPD (DW) "E" 5,320 SF. X (2112 FT.) X 0.9 = 798 CU. FT. I'OTAL SITE SEWAGE FLOW = 968.2 GPD ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ a c~-;s~r R~ USE: (2) 10' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL SAtlTARY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS m~ o~ somom (1) 10' X t2' STORM DRAIN RING = 82t CU. FT. SEPTIC SYSTEM - g6~8..2 GPD ~) PROVIDED REQUIRED ~ RESIDENC~/ l\ ~[ ~ /// 821 CU. FT. > 798 CU. FT. 1.SEPTIC TANK !ST). 968.2 GPD x 2 DAY FLOW -- 1,g36.4 GAL ~ DRY WELL AREA X RA NFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR USE MINIMUM, 2,000 GAL SEPTIC TANK (t0 FT DIA x 4 FT LD) / ZONING (DWI"F" 7,1218F. X (2/12FT.) X 0.9 =1068 CU. FT. 2.GREASET.~R~u.(GT) ~ ~ LI / .U.UD ~.... ~/ __~__~''OOO~_ -~, _ ___ USE: (2) 10' DIAMETER X 8' HIGH POOL USE MINIMUM. (8 FT DIA X 5 FT LD, ~ ~/// PUM,iNW~.~ ~?,110~ , / ~'*'~ (2) 10' X 8' STORM DRAIN RING = t094 CU. FT. 3.LEACHING POOLS ( LP ): 968.2 / t.5 S.F.IGPD = 645.5 S.F. -- P~,D..V. JDED REQUIRED USE MINIMUM ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X g FT. HT.) ( ?0oo~-=~ \ / r\ ~OsuR~.OU<~CN~t. yUiey P~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ J/d. ~R~k O~ Cm' ~S p[~ ~,[Y~D = ~O 078 t094 CU. FT. > 1068 CU. FT. EFFECTIVE DEPTH ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X 8.67 FT. HT.) = 650.25 S.F. WArm ~rn' PLUS 80% EXPANSION (EXP,: 2 - 8 FT DIA x 9 FT HT ,eosu,~,Ht~' , ~. EV~ I-~ ~a..ADE LINE E~,ATI,ON +~.O FT. III. W~.STE WATER PROCESSING O~mLS.~' 11769 J / FF EL ~.O .~ I ~IIN. 2 I~.~. r~EW PRODUCTION AREA ~ ~. WASH DOWN OF WINE MAKING EQUIPMENT 395 GPD / / ,,~,,,~.I IJl ,, ~ TOP OFPOOL TOTAL WASTE WATER PROCESSI..NG 395GPD -~_ ~ I/e A=T, I I WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS· -- -~ ~ ~EI IL.I= ~ 2 .EAC, HiN~I~I.O FT. [fASTEWATERSYSTEM-395GPD / _.,~.o-*~ '.SETTLEME.T TA..: 396 GPD x2 DAYS FLOW=790 GAL / · ~o' 20.0 PT. (1) 1,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK (STL) (8 FT DIA x 4 FT LD) / / -- ~ ~ ~ SYSTEM #2, NO SCALE FP EL FT. TANK I/4."A=T. ~RADE ~4.1 FT. SEPTIC PROFILE FOR WINERY SYSTEM #t, NO SCALE TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL SEPTIC SYSTEM INLET LLEACHING POOLS 395 GPD / t.5 SF / GPD = 263 SF USE t0 FT DIAx 10 FT HT POOL (LP) EFFECTIVE DEPTH (10 FT. DIA. X 9.67 FT. HT.) = 303.6 S.F. PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): '10 FT DIA x 10 FT iHT SEPTIC TANK - 2000 GALLON SEPTIC SYSTEM GREASE TRAP N.T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM Suffolk County Department of Hea~th Approval for Construction-Other Than Single Family i The~e plan~ have been re~iew.~_ for general conformEAce : Ce~uty Deparb~eut of P,e~ltK 8ervice~ aiandard8, relating to water i zuppl¥ End aewage disposal· Regardlees of any inco~d~encle~ or lack of detail, con,traction i~ required to accordance with the at~zched permit conditions and spplieable ' 8t~ndArd~, unle~ epeeificaily waived by the Department. ~]fis approve! expire8 3 yeare from the spproYai Approval Dai:eReviewer TYPICAL LEACHING~OOL DETAIL SETTLEMENT TANK - a2oo GALLON ~ ~.'r.~. WASTE WATERIYSTEM ~.'r.~· WASTE INATER SYSTEM REVISIONS: 7~30~07 81t5/07 8130107. SCALE: 1" = SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN DETAILS CALCULATION; SHEET NO: 3 NO~TH ~OA~ NE~ D~IV~A¥ NO~,TH ~OA~ OOUNTY P-.OAI;> 48 ~x]sUng ploni:lngs to removed In this oreo pending "ZBA" opproval and else ~nere on sli:e Shrubs, Hgdrangas, S gal, Azoleas, S gal, Hollies, SE>" h~, ~round¢overs, VIn¢o Perrenlols. Verf~ plonUngs prior i:o else ~nere on siLe OOUNT¥ removed In ~;hls oreo pending "ZBA" ol:>provol ond i:ransplc~ni:ed else where on sli:e ~eplanli; ~l~:h: Evergreen hedge Toxus medlo hlckslf, 4E.," hi:, ~ SE>" oc, Hicks tje~l NEW New Holkj Bushes B ~i: Ht c~herr~ Tree Tree 14 ~i: H'~ ~herr~ Arborvl~oe \ \ ~:XIBTIN~ TO BE Exlsi:ing Blue Spruce Tree Shrubs: ~ver~reen hedge Toxus medlo Ne~ plonUngs Tt~E ~ Shrubs: Evergreen hedge Ploni:lngs oi: base oF sion ;OV? TronspIoni:ed Toxus medlo hlcksll, 4~" h~, ~ Poch~sondr~ ~&" oc., Hlc~ ~ J~ponese Hollies, DO h~, ~ ~roundcovers: Vinci, perrenlols ~ ..Ira Pockets oF Fountoln ornoment~l ~r~sses .~ross 24-~"h~ LA~N PA~KIN~ ~ j I~>,g,,~/~f~ ~ J G~HIN~/~OA~IN~ J P~OPOS~O Transp Ioni:~d Burning Bush Hew plonUngs Shrubs: Holl~.lWOOd Junipers 5 fi: hi: Viburnum hlcksll, 4¢" hi, Hicks ~ jl Jj LANDSCAPE PLAN ALONG COUNTY ROW SCALE: 1" [] 20'-0" TOWN PLAN~ ,NG SUBMISSIOI~ LU O PROJECT NO: 06tl DRAWN BY: UT CHECKED BY: NS SHEET TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN ALONG COUNTY ROW SHEET NO: 9 OLD NORTH HI~,N LAHN L NORTH ~OAD C, OUNTY ~OA:D 45 COUNTY LAHN Taxue medTa ~11~ke, II, ,4~'~l~, DRIVE~A¥ BOLiAI~:::~ iI~HTS, "/oy, I, BE~A ~-~'1 HH, ,~hr'uL~, H~jci'an~as, 5 ,gal, Azaleas, · g, ~xl~L~n~ plantings b~ this area pend[r~j "2~A" ~ppr~val md HI&H LINE POLl-- rpproval Traneplant~d Bar~ ~-4&" h~ - FAC, A~E UPLI~HTS, tREE UPLI~Ht~, ~ ~^ ~15, I,'4ALKI~IA¥ LIOHTS, ~::)1~, t~=6,A 21'/~, ~-~0~ LA~IN TO BE REHOVE~ TILL I0 PM, 'ffPIGAL NE~ PLANTI~ Existing ~ep~ng C~nm-nJ TI-ee ~ '~L ~ HI~_H. L.tHE POLE trmeplanh~l ~nrut~, Hollg~=~l Junlpe,'~ 5 f'L h~ hL ~,ROUNDC, OVE~.% LAHN HALL I~:~UN]~ ~ ON ~ ~E~UIRED O'v'DRPLO~ AF~EA PARTIAL SITE LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" 510N UPLI~HTS, ~, E~A ~0~, TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION LU OI -z,I PROJECTNO: 061t DRAWN BY: NS & UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE .ANDSCAPIN~ & LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NO: 4 : REVISED October 24, 2007 0 -- 5URPACIN, U " , ON A~PH/H.T -- " ' LAPIN kV~N : __ NOTI=, _~-' DRAWN'BY: NS & UT SCTM # 1000-59-t0-1 PROPERTY: 39750 CR 48 DATE: August 7, 2007 ADDRESS SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 , SCALE: OWNER: THOMAS P. ROSICKI 1" = 20'-0' CYNTHIA ROSICKI (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) "' S" - A i LOCATION S,EETT,T'E: ~1~;= ~f~^~ I tk I I I ZONING: A-C ENLARGED SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" SURVEYOR: STANLEY J, ISAKSEN, JR SITE NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 PLAN LICENSE # 49273 ~-~ DATED 18 AUGUST 2000 PARKING CALCULATIONS ~ BUILDING: TOTAL: 17,189SQ. FT. RETAIL AREA 837 SFI200 SFISPACE 4.1 SPACES/ AREA WINERY (foot print): 7,662 SQ. FT. SHEET NO: OFFICE AREA 813 SFII00 SFISPACE 8.1 SPACES TASTING ROOM 4170 SFI200 SFISPACE 20.8 SPACES CRUSH PAD: 2,885 SQ. FT. 'q STORAGE AREA 33os SFII00OSFISPACE 3.3 SPACES OUTDOOR TERRACES: 6,642 SQ. FT. oo LOT: 3.3% ACTUAL I 20% MAX. ALLOWABLE ~ PRODUCTION AREA 2415 SFI500SFISPACE 4.8 SPACES O TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 41.1 OR 41 SPACES COVERAGE Lq TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 45 SPACES WI2 N.C PARKING: 22,558 SQ FT I 4.3 % LOT COVERAGE LANDSCAPING: 486,813 SQ FT I 92.5 % LOT COVERAGE AS BUILT - SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 REVISED October 24, 2007 :XICTIN~ D~IVt=~'A¥ C'LOD~=p '" " - 51~N ~ Z ' OIL A~ ~ ~ ~IN~ OIL AND ~LU~TONE ~ITH PRIV~ ~ 0 ~, L~N . ' ," ~ ' - ~r ~ L x~.~'ll~~~~ ~ ~=A ~ / ,' ~' ~LO ~E - ~:.,']~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I NOTE= L~N OVERALL Sl~ PLAN * . I , ~ D~WN BY: NS & UT I INID"/, F[g> SITIE I)ATI .s SCTM ~ 1000~9-t0-1 PROPERS: 39750 CR 48 DATE: August 7, 2007 ADDRESS SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 ,, ~ ~r::':--;:r,~,~ ............ :~, ,r,*;,,,U SCALE: OWNER: THOMAS P. RoSICKI 1" = 20'~" LOCATION MAP II I I I I (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) , ,}~ ~= L,__[._l~ ~ ~ .F iHEET TITLE: -- SITE: 526,560 SQ. FT. = 12.088 AC ~ ~ ~ ~ ZONIng: A-C ' 200 ENLARGED SCALE: ~" = 20'-0" ~, SURWYOR: STA~Y ~. ~SAKSeN, ~R ~e. *~ ~ NEW SUFFOLK, NY 11956 ~("2:,, u',i ~ PLAN ~ ucE.sE. ~=~3 PARKING CALCU~TIONS DATED t8 AUGUST 2006 RETAIL AREA 837 SF,20O SFISPACE4,1SPACES / SlTE.~ ~' '~ BUILDING: TOTAL: t 7,189 SQ. FT. TASTING ROOM 417o SFI200 SFISPACE 20.8 SPACES CRUSH PAD: 2,885 SQ. FT. STOOGE AR~ ~=os SFI10~SFISPACE 3,3 SPACES OUTDOOR TER~CES: 6,642 SQ. FT. PRODUCTION AR~ 2415 SF/S00 SF/SPACE 4.8 SPACES LOT: 3.3 ~ ACTUAL / 20% M~. ALLOWABLE TOTAL PARING SPACES REQUIRED 41.1 OR 41 SPACES COVE~GE T~AL PARmNG PROV~OEO ~ SPACES W~ H.C PARKING: 22,558 SQ FT I 4.3 % LOT COVE~GE LANDSCAPING: 486,813 SQ FT I 92.5 % LOT COVE~GE AS BUILT - SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 REVISED: O wc HOLE t I ~ * L ~A~TE ~ATE~ ~ ~ (0 I~OO~E~LEHENTDAL, ¢ FTTANK~IA x 4 ~T LD (¢T .) NOTE: (~_~) (I) mo ~T ~,~ x ,O FT HT LDA~HING POOL 5EH SHEET ~D FOR (0 IO PT DIA X mo PT HT (EXP) ~ e~~%L. ~ o OVERALL ~m~ ~LAN ~X~N~NON ~OOL I CHECKED BY: NS GEOSCIENCE SCALE: NO SCALE 8OUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 SCTM ~ 1000-59-10-1 1" = 20~" PROPERS: 39756 CR 48 SHEET TITLE: ~ 1~. BAEK B~OW~ SlL~ LO~ OL ADDRESS SOUTHOLD. NY 11911 CYNTHIA EOSlCKI t' ~.. -, (SPARKLING POINTE, LLC) To .~.~ua s~. SITE: S2S,SS0 SO. FT. = ~ ~ SU~VEYOE: STANLEYJ. ~SAKSE~, PO BOX 294 , .... S~EE,T.N~ ..... ..~ NEW SUFFOLK, NY 1195~, A8 BUILT - 8EPTE~BE~ 38, 25.1 SANITARY CALCULATIONS I. ALLOWABLE DENSITY T~E--~--~.010 ACRES (NON PLANTED VINEYARD) DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: HYDROGEOLOGICALZONE: ZONE IV ZONING ROOF AREA OF NEW WINERY WATER SUPPLY: PUBLIC WATER ~X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR ALLOWABLE DENSITY: 2.010 Acres x 600 GPO. = 1,206 GPD. ZONING AC USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER x 5 HIGH POOLS (6) 8' DIAMETER x 4' HIGH POOLS ~ PLAN SHE "T #1 (1) 8' X 10' STORM DRAIN RING = 422.5 CU. FT. 1. TASTING ROOM (5 GPD/Occupant) (6) 8' X 4' STORM DRAIN RING = 1,0t3.4 CU. FT. 5 GPD X 91 Occupants = 456 GPD B ,, 1,435.9 CU. FT. 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPD/SF) F~U RESIDENCE ~UV.U~U REQUIRED 0.06 GPD X 804 SF = 48.2 GPO ~~ ~ RESIDENCE 1.435.9 CU. FT. > 1,313 CU. FT. 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPDISF) PARKING AREAS 0.04 GPD X 5,203 SF = 208.t GPD ~REA X RAINFALL X RUNOFFFACTOR~ ~ ~-- 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPDISF) (DW) B 7,717SF. X (2/12 FT.) X 0.9=1,158CU. FT. 0.03GPDX979SF=29.4GPD ~ ~~~ - -- -- USE: (3) 10 DIAMETER x 7' HIGH POOL (3) 10' X 7' STORM DRAIN RING = 1,437 CU. FT. TOTAL SITE DENSITY FLOW = 740.7 GPD -- REQU,.ED 1,437 CU. FT. > 1,158 CU. FT. DRYWELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR II. SAN.ARYDESIGN (OW) "C" 4,152 SF. X (2/12 FT.) X 0.9 = 623 CU. FT. SEWAGE DESIGN FLOW: 7-.~NING / ~ ~.~.. ~.~-~ su~ou< COUN~ USE: (1) 8' DIAMETER x 6' HIGH POOL WINERY: COUNTYRO~ USE: (2) 8' DIAMETER x 8' HIGH POOL 1)8' X 6' STORM DRAIN RING =253 CU. FT. 1. TAST'"G "OOM (5 GPO * 2.5 GPD Oac,pa,, / LB 2) 8' X 8' STORM DRAIN RING 676 CU. FT. 7.5 GPD X 91 Occupants = 682.5 GPD RESIDENcEBUSINESS/ / 929 CU. FT. 2. OFFICE SPACE (0.06 GPDISF) / PROVIDED REQUIRED 0,06 GPD X 804 SF = 48.2 GPD 929 CU. FT. > 623 CU. FT. 3. WINE PRODUCTION (0.04 GPDISF) DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL ~( RUNOFF FACTOR 0.04 GPD X 5,283 SF = 208.t GPD (DW) "D" 5,746 SF. X (2/12 FT.) 0.9 = 862 CU. FT. 4. RETAIL (0.03 GPDISF) ~ USE: (2) 10' DIAMETER x 7" HIGH POOL 0.03 GPD X 979 SF = 29.4 GPD /~ // SEWAGE FLOW = 968.42GPD '~ A/ Z~G (2}110' X 7' STORM DRAIN RING = 950 CU. FT. PROVIDED REQUIRED TOTAL SITE SEWAGE FLOW = 968.2 GPD 658 CU. FT. > 862 CU. FT. SANITARY SYSTEM ~EQUIREMENTS ~4~ DRY WELL AREA X RAINFALL X RUNOFF FACTOR SEPTIC SYSTEM 968.2 GPD (DW)"E" 5,320SF. X (2112FT.) X 0.9=798CU. FT. I.SEPTIC TANK (ST): 968.2 GPD x 2 DAY FLOW =1,936.4 GAL USE: (2) 10' DIAMETER x 6' NIGH POOL USE MINIMUM: 2,000 GAL SEPTIC TAINK (t0 FT DIA x 4 FT LD)~ (1) 10' X 12' STORM DRAIN RING = 821 CU. FT. .~ BARN REQUmED 2.GREASE "BB'"B"CF I 821 CU. FT. > 798 CU. FT. USE MINIMUM: (8 FT DIA x 5 FT LD) 3.LEACHING POOLS ( LP ): 960.2 / 1.5 S.F./GPD -- 64S.5 S.F. ~ ~ ZONING DRY(Dw) "F"WELL 7,121 sF.AREA xX RAINFALL(2/12 FT.) xX 0.9 = 1068 CU. FT.RUNOFF FACTOR USE MINIMUM ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X 9 FT. HT.) ~ ~/ LI \ USE: (2) 10' DIAMETER x 8' HIGH POOL EFFECTIVE DEPTH ( 3 - 8 FT. DIA. X 8,67 FT. HT.) = 650.25 S.F. ~ / PUBLICiNW~G~. FIELD& (2) 10' X 8' STORM DRAIN RING = 1094 CU. FT. PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 2 - 8 FT DIA x 9 FT HT O -- B ~ / PUMP ~_~TION PROVIDED REQUIRED IlL WASTE WATER PROCESSING ~ / ~ooo-6 ~-4 1094 CU. FT. > 1068 CU. FT. NEW PRODUCTION AREA / ~OSU~ou<AC~< ..~!FBuN~ BUILOIN~ IN,ALL WASH DOWN OF WINE MAKING EQUIPMENT 395 GPD / 40~0 SUN FF EL ;54.0 TOTAL WASTE WATER PROCESSING 395 GPD ~ O~B^~/~Y ~f~DE DO.5 FT. WASTE WATER PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS: IE. +~1.54 ID. +51.54 WASTE WATER SYSTEM - 395 GPD 1.SETTLEMENT TANK: 395 GPD x 2 DAYS FLOW = 790 GAL I/4"/~=T' TOP OF POOL (1) 1,200 GAL SETTLEMENT TANK (STL) (8 FT DIA x 4 FT LD) ~RADE 54.1 FT. ~;=PTIC, 2.LEACHING POOLS 395 GPD/ 1.5 SF I GPD= 263 SF / USE 10 FT DIAx 10 FT HT POOL (LP) ~ TANK, POOL EOT OF POOL EFFECTIVE DEPTH (t0 FT. DIA. X 9.67 IFT. HT.) = 303.6 S.F. / 1/4"/FT. IL. +5o.'/& PLUS 50% EXPANSION (EXP): 10 FT DIA x 10 FT HT SEPTIcl PROFILE FOR WINERY SYSTEM ;/t, NO SCALE ~.A~E LIN~ ;=LEVATION 55.0 FT. ~ FLOOR DP. AIN~ IN /lJUILPINe I,~ALL OF[A~E LINE E~LEV'ATI~ON + 257/ FT. I I ~I.~E~ / J FF EL 2~.0 /-- I MIN. 2 M,A.3(. I J ~oglg WASTE WATER PROFILE FOR WINERY SYSTEM #2, NO SCALE ;' .,":1, 4,, .... .Er TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL SEPTIC TANK - 2000 GALLON GREASE TRAP TYPICAL LEACHING POOL DETAIL N.T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM ..T.S. SEPTIC SYSTEM .:r.s. SEPTIC SYSTEM ..T.S. WASTE WATER SYSTEM / AC 40555 CR 48 %_/ ZONING AC FARM SETTLEMENT TANK - 1200 GALLON N.T.S. WASTE WATER SYSTEM / / AS BUILT - SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 REVISIONS: 7/30107 8115107 8~30~07 REVISIONS: 9/I0/09 WASTE WATER SYS. REVISIONS: 9/30/09 U.I O DRAWN BY: NS & UT CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 100'-0" SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN DETAILS HEET NO: 3 LAI~N LAhlN · C e, A · · A * " C · *' A *' * C * ,I/',IALL MOUN i EO PLOOPLI~,HT~,, PIALL MOUN i tE~ ~AMP ilCHT¢, I~l~l CF, BE~A 2g,:20P, I,~IALL MOUN~ ~0 ~ I EP LI&HTG, ~IN 64% l!~A GEILIN¢ MOUNTEZ2 POPIN LIGHTS, ~oi~ BEeA 1224~60, q,~O LUHI~NE~ · O · e Ae FAC, ADE UPLICHTS, ~ t~.EE UPLICHT~, LA~N '" a · C 51~,N UPLICHT¢, BE&A LUMEN5 FACADE UP LAPIN DU~ TILL I0 F~,,I, LIgHtS, I~Y~ TILL IO PlVl, PAql.E.e. Ay LI~HT~, l~OJfl, - BE~A 21'~, BE~A 1224.,~ ON ~ Rr=GUIRI~7 LAV~N PARTIAL SITE LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" TOWN PLANNING SUBMISSION iii 0 I --'il CHECKED BY: NS DATE: August 7, 2007 SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" SHEET TITLE: SITE _ANDSCAPIN( & LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NO: