Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-103.-1-19.2 (4)SITE DATA SCTM $1000-103~1-19.2 ONNER: HER~{AN BLUM 3904 COLONIAL BOULEVARD EAST NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34652 ADJACENT LAND OWNERS: FRANK CICHANOWICZ MAIN ROAD PECONIC, NY 11958 SCTM $1000-103-1-19.3 REYNOLD F. BLUM PO BOX 709 CUTCROGUE, 5rY 11935 SCTM $1000-103-1-19.11 ARCHITECTS: SAMUELS & STEELMAN ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NY 11936 516-734-6405 Site Plan taken from survey RODERICK VAN TUYL License SLS 25626 Dated: 03/I7/77 prepared by: Existing Zoning: Residential Office (Re) Existing Building Area: 6,975 S.F. Existing Lot Area: 2,783 Acres, 121,228 S.F. Existing Lot Coverage: 5.8% PARKING REQUIREMENTS FARM STAND: 4 SPACES RESIDENCE: 2 SPACES STORAGE: I PER 1,000 SQ.FT. 600+392+1200=2192 SQ.FT. * 1000=2.2 SPACES LIGHT INDUSTRIAL: i PER 500 SQ.FT. 2415 SQ.FT. . 500= 4.8 SPACES TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 13 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 15 SANITARY SYSTEM DATA: Building Use: Design Flow: 2415 sq. ft. Winery 1200 sq. ft. Barn 392 sq. ft. Shed 600 sq. ft. Garage 575 sq. ft. Farm Stand Single Family House IV 121,229 sq. ft. / 2.783 Acres Industrial Storage/ Warehouse: Winery 0.04 GPD/sq. ft. of Building Area 0.O~ X 2415 sq. ft. = 97 GPD Industrial Storage: 0.04 X 2192 sq. ft. Market: Farm Stand 0.05 GPD/sq. fi. of Barn, Shed, Garage = 88 GPD Building Area 0.05 X 575 sq. ft. = 29 GPD Single Family House = 300 GPD DENSITY FLOW: GPD / Acre: 300 ao0 X 2.783 = 594.9 GPD ~LLOWABLE FLOW: GPD: Total Flow = 514 GPD "Pursuant to Suffolk County sanitary Code Articles 7 and 12, I, ~[F~'~°iD ~a~l hereby certify that there wzll not be mny industrial wastes or other non-sanitary wastes discharged from the building and there will be no toxic or hazardous materials stored at the site unless specific permits or exemptions are granted pursl.a t to those Articles. Facility OWner s Signature , Date ~/'~'~ ." '\ APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD , SITE PLAN / --- ] -, ~"r~tz.~ o1115 LlbJZ I~ X~pLE '2¢ '7 JUL 3 0 k~I~k']~UNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES ArPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION ONLY 1990 >- :0 Project No' Drawn By Checked By. Date. d~ Scale: I"= Sheet Title, SITE PLAN Sheet No: BP-1 NOT£S: Storage tank located in the building must be a minimum of eighty two (82) WELC 'TYPICAl tV'ELL to i MAIN ROADI(RQUTE 25) 4 '" KEY MAP LISi OF LAND OWNERS KEY OWNER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Frank Cichanowicz Dalchet Corporation Sudar P. Sahu iWtlliam F. Coster Std. Grace Meiner Anthony Imbriano Nell! L. Doroski ~eorge & Mostupanick & Wf ~ugene J. Mort & Wife K & K Associates New York Telephone Co. ~utchogue Methodist Church andford, H. & Ano. Iohn G. Scott III ~ames & Elizabeth Noman ~ames & Elizabeth Homart ~eynold F, Blum USE Agricultural Agricultural Agricultural Residential Funeral Nome Residential Agricultural Residential Gas Station Commercial Commercial Telecommunications Church Nursery & Greenhouse Agricultural Residential Residential Winery GRAPHIC SCALE SITE~ LOCATION MAP >- m OI Project No: Drawn By. Checked Date' C;C~T: 4. Scale Sheet lit]e. KEY MAP Sheet No SP-2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Oflowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD A~zgust 14, 1990 ScoTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Reynold F. Blum Peconic Bay Vineyards Main Road P.O. Box 709 Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Peconic Bay Vineyards SCTM~1000-103-1-19.2 Dear Mr. Blum: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 13, 1990. WHEREAS, Herman Blum is the owner of the property known and designated as Peconic Bay Vineyards SCTM#1000-103-1-18.2, located at 31280 Main Road, Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on October 11, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on January 19, 1990; and WHEREAS, a Special Exception was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on February 15, 1990; and WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector on April 16, 1990; and Dear Town of Southold Council ,Board of Trustees, `d and Zoning Board of Appeals DECEMBER 2021 RE: PECONIC BAY VINEYARD, SOLOVIEV SEC 1000 103-1-19.3 AND 1000 103-1-19,12 IN CUTCHOGUE WE ARE WRITING TO OPPOSE THE PECONIC BAY VINEYARD HOTEL COMPLEX AS SHOWN ON THE "REALDEAL.COM" WEBSITE AND IN THE SUFFOLK TIMES. EVERYTHING IS WAY TOO BIG. WE ARE WORRIED ABOUT THE POTENTIAL TRAFFIC USING STILLWATER AVE. THIS PROPERTY DOES HAVE ROAD FRONTAGE DIRECTLY ON STILLWATER AVE. ANYTHING OTHER THAT THE OCCASIONAL FARM TRACTOR WOULD BE UNWANTED. NO DRIVEWAYS FOR INGRESS OR EGRESS ON STILLWATER AVE. JUST LIKE MANY OTHER VINEYARDS WE ARE CONCERNED THAT IT WILL MORPH INTO A BIGGER BUSINESS IN LATER YEARS. WHAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A TASTING ROOM HAS BECOME A WINE BAR AT OTHER LOCATIONS. WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THIS "UPSCALE" ESTABLISHMENT WILL BENEFIT US LOCALS,EXCEPT FOR A FEW GOOD JOBS, AS WE HAVE PROBLEMS WITH AFFORDABLE kAL_XAT�13C HOUSING TODAY. C mm III NO OUTDOOR AMPLIFIED MUSIC SHOULD BE ALLOWED, EVEN FOR SPECIAL EVENTS. D1 (321 NO MORE THAN 2 SPECIAL EVENTS PER YEAR. Plaruin ng Bozird NO ODOR OR COOKING SMELLS FROM THE RESTAURANT. BRAUN"S SMELL SANTA'S TREE FARM FAILED MISERABLY LAST YEAR 2020 WITH PARKING, DARK SKIES, AMPLIFIED MUSIC I CAN SEE 8 TO 9 ACRES FOR BUSINESS ALONG MAIN ROAD, NOT THE 13 TO 15 THEY WANT TO BUILD ON. THE LOTS ARE CURRENTLY 2 ACRE RESIDENTIAL ZONING. PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW " SPECIAL EXEMPTION PERMITS" OR OTHER VARIANCES FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. ANY AND ALL OF THE MANY POTENTIAL COTTAGES SHOULD BE ON LOTS OF 2 ACRE ZONING EACH. THEY ARE HOUSES! THEIR PROPOSED LOCATIONS ARE WELL BEHIND ( OUTSIDE) THE BUSINESS AREA TO THE NORTH. THIS AREA IS CURRENTLY ZONED 2 ACRES. THIS WAY IF AND WHEN THE BUSINESS IS SOLD OR FAILS THE COTTAGES CANNOT BE GRANDFATHERED IN ON UNDERSIZED LOTS. THERE ARE OVER 40 ACRES THAT THEY CAN USE. AS FAR AS WE KNOW THERE ARE 4 POSSIBLE HOTEL-MOTEL APPLICATIONS IN THE WORKS OR SOON TO BE. DO WE REALLY NEED OR WANT THESE MANY HOTEL-MOTELS HERE? WE HOPE THE ALL OF THE TOWNS BOARDS CAN KEEP THIS PROJECT IN SCALE WITH THE COMMUNITY'S CHARACTER. WE ARE REFERRED TO AS A HAMLET. WE DO NOT WANT TO BE A DESTINATION. WE HAVE MOVED OR HAVE CHOSEN TO LIVE HERE BECAUSE OF THE RURAL NATURE OF THE AREA NOT THE NEW YORK CITY TYPE HUSTLE. THANK YOU GWEN KRASILOVSKY AND KONRAD KLAUER 430 STILLWATER AVE. Page 2 Peconic Bay Vineyards WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board approve and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final survey dated May 10, 1990, subject to a one year review from date of building permit. Please contact this office if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr.~ Chairman Encl. cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Samuels and Steelman, Architects Charles Watts, Town Assessors IN SQUAR}~ET LOCATED ON SCTM# 1000- SITE PLAN Presub mission conference (within 30 days of written request) Complete application received (within 4 months of presub. conference) Application reviewed at work session (within 10 days of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions (within 30 days of review)' Revised sub mission received Lead Agency Coordination I SEQRA determination ~2~/~ ~¥~ ~- Zoning Board of Appeals ( '~-~. / ~' ~, [] [~ (written comments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees - ~['~ Department of Transportation -State 'Department of Transportation - ;ounty '~ Suffolk County Dept. of Healtl/~ 0 /'~ Fire Corn missioners RECEIVED: Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape plan Lighting plan Curb Cut approval ~.~ Drainage plan Reviewed by Engineer Building Department (certification) ~/~O --~['~ Suffolk County Department of Planning~· /,/~ ~'] ~ Received:_, Approval of site plan -with conditions Endorsement of site plan Certificate of Occupancy inspection One year review 'FO D I, ~! I~ ~ : s o6q' 2 0 Southold, N.Y. 11971 '" ' (516) 765-193B APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of APplicati°~~~iling Fee Date Rec'd Change of Use Re-Use E~tension-of Existing Use New Use - (Date of Approval Revision 6f an Approved site Plan Other Specify_****************** Name of Business o?]~it? ~.. , v~ k ~t~3 iD Location of Site M~,,^ ~A~ , , ,~r , ~ - Address of Site,~__ '~,~'w .¥ I Name of Applicant ' ' Address o~ Applicant Person to be responsible for Construction Telephone -- Applicant's interest in site-check one: ~ner o~ Land under contract to purchase~ ~ner of-Fee Title to Land Telephone Address .... ~ ~.~,~iLicense No.~l~ Site Plans Preparea Dy~.~,,~/ ..... ~~ /~i/h ~ 7~ of Site [~[2~ Sq. Ft. Zone District~O - Total Land Area --' ',~ , ~osed Use of ~istin~ Use of Site ~,~l~l . ,'-,- ~.. ,~7~ s~ft. ..~qft. ~2~.~ ~'Area of ~x~ting Structure~~~$e ~ sq~t. Gross Floor Ar~ u~ r~ ~ Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot ~or Parking (where applicable) "% Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) Other Dat~(Specify)U.S-G-S- ~ Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals ~ Case N~ber ~ Name of Applicant ~, ~ Da'te of Decision~ ~ 'q~ _ ._~ra~o~ d by the Suffolk County Will eany toxic or ha~araous ma~e~ax~, Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? N~ber and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE u~ERT~EN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PL~ BY THE pLYING BO~- APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK " COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~[Y~ ~'~ being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at /~,fJ ~ ~ ~<;/~F in the State of New York, and.that he is the.owner of the above property; or that he is the ~M~-~ of ~ /[c~/~ ~W/ ~/~g/~/f2~ (Title) (Specify whether Partnership ~/f7~=~ which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII' of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire .parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the 'approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. ( Owner ) Sworn to before me this ~ day of ~.~t 19 ~ (Partner or C~6r~te Officer and Title) .£ 14.16.4 (2/87)--Text 12 ROJECT I.D. NUMBER .,, ,.., Stale Environmental Quality Review ~I-IUR¥ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only ~ART I--PROJECT INFORMATION ¢o be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) SEQR 1. APPL CANT/SPONSOR ~.. PROJECT HAME , I,~ ' 4. PRECISE LOCATION [Street ad~es~ a~foa¢ Cntersections, p&minent landmarks, etc., or ~¢ovlde map) Ave iO ¢ Co--in 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration B. DESCRIBE PROJECT eRIEFLY: , . , · 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Inlflally '~ acres Ultimately 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? dYes [] NO If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN ViCiNITY OF PROJECT? [~Residentla, I [] Industrial ~,Commercial Describe: Agriculture [] parldForest/Open space [] Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes [] NO Il yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 1 t. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACT[Oft HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes ,J~ No If yeu, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Appllcantlsponsor name: ~.1~ ~'~ ~~ Dale: the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 ~J~l A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE .~.--SHOLO IN 6 NYCRR FART 61Z. 127 If yes, oo¢~reilLe roe review procell .n~ usa I~e FULL ~F. J ~, WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW A8 PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 II NO, j negative ~eclaratlon I may be superseded by another Involved agency. ! ~ Yes ~ "O C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, If legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surfaoe or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing trafflo patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? ExpJaln briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly:. C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant hat31tate, or threatened ot endangered species? Explain briefly:. C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural reso~rcse7 Explain brlefl C5. Growlh. subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain Drtelly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not Identified in C1-C57 Explain briefly. C7, Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] NO tf Yes, explain b.<iefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: Fo~' each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreYersibility; (e) geographiD scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessa~/, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations Dontain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been Identified and adequately addressed. ~1 Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse Impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed direcUy to the FULL FAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the Information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Date 2 October 18, 1989 Sou%hold Town Planning Board Main Road Sou%hold, NY 11971 Re: Peconic Bay Vineyards SCTM ~1000-103-1-19.2 0CT 2 0, Dear Sirs: with reference %o %he enclosed site Plan Application on property located on the south side of Main Road, be%ween Harbor Lane and Stillwa%er Avenue in Cutchogue, NY, I submit the following uses for %he existing building structures: 1) Large barn for winery production- 2) Smaller barns %o continue existing use as agricultural storage. 3) House to continue as residence. 4) Farm stand to continue as presently used. Very truly yours, PO BOX 709 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Mr. Herman Blum P. O. Box 709 Cutchogue, N. Y. 11935 August 15, 1989 Town of Southold Main Road Southold~ New York 11971 Dear Sirs: I hereby authorize my son, Reynold Blum, President of Peconic Bay Vineyards, Inc., to petition the Town of Southold for an extension of special exception to operate a winery on my property at 31280 Main Road, Cutchogue, N. Y. Sincerely yours, Herman Blum · (Please Use this Form for Filing your Local Law with the Secretary o; State) Text of law shot:id be given as amended. Do not include matter being eliminated and do not use italics or underlining to indicate new matter. ~:tc~: of ~gp.thqLd ................... Town ............................. Local Law No......1.5.................. of theyenr19 ~.9. ....... Alecallaw In Relation tR ~gRip. g ...... (Inert tide) Be it enacted by the T~ Board ..................... of the (Name of Legislative Body) Town of SouthoJd.. .. . ... . .... asfollows: I. Chapter 100 (Zoning) of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended as follows: 1. Section 100-31.B(13) is hereby amended to read as follows: (13) Wineries for the production and sale of wine produced from grapes primarily grown in the vineyards on which such winery is located. 2. Section 100-42.B is hereby amended by adding thereto a new subsection (4) to read as follows: (4) Wineries as set forth and regulated by Section 100-31. B (13) of the .Agricultural Conservation District. 3. Section 100-61.B(1) is hereby amended to read as follows: (1) Any special~'exception use set forth in and as regulated by Section 100-31.B(1), (6), (7), (13) and (14) of the Agricultural Conservation District. Section 100-71.B is hereby amended by adding thereto a new sub~ection (6) to read as follows: (6} Wineries 5. Section 100-81.B(1) is hereby amended to read as follows: (1) Any special exception use as set forth irand regulated by Section 100-31.B of the Agricultural Conservation District, except wineries are not required to be in connection with a vineyard. 6. Section 100-91.B is hereby amended by adding thereto a new subsection (10) to read as follows: (10) Wineries 7. Section 100-101.B(1) is hereby amended to read as follows: (1) Any special exception use as set forth in and regulated by section 100-31.B(2) to (13), except wineries are not required to be in connection with a vineyard. (If additional space is needed, please attach sheets of the same size as this and number each) fi) II. 8. Section 100-131.B is .hereby amended by adding thereto a new subsection (14) to read as follows: (14) Wineries 9. Section 100-141.B is hereby amended by adding thereto a new subsection (3) to read as follows: (3) Wineries This Local Law shall take effect upon its filing with the Secretary of State. (Complete the certification in the paragraph which applies to the filing of this local law and strike out the matter therein which is not. applicabl.e..) (Final adoption by local legislative body only.) I hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No .... 15... of 1 ~.9 ...... of thc Town of ...S. 9.u.t.h.°.l.d. ....was duly passed by the ........ .Tp.w.O..B. 90.r.d. .................... (Name of Legislative Body) on .....A..U.!l.U..s.t...1., .......... 19 ..8..9....'in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. 2. {Passage by local legislative body with approval or no disapproval by Elective Chief Executive Officer,* or repassage after disapproval.) I hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No .......... of 19 ........ County _. City ol~tneTown of..............., was duly passed by the. ............................... .. ...... · (Name of Legislative Body) Village not disapproved on ............................. 19 ........ and was approved by the ............................ repassed after disapproval Elective Chief Executive Officer* and was deemed duly adopted on .................................. 19 ......... in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. 3. (Final adoption by referendum.) ofthe on ............................. 19 ........ and was approved repassed after disapproval ! hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No .........of 19 ........ County City of ...... was duly passed by the ................... Town (Name of Legislative Body) Village not disapproved by the ............................ Elective Chief Executive Officer* on .................................. 19 .......... Such local law was submitted to the people by reason of a mandatory referendum, and received the affirmative vote of a majority of the qualified electors voting permissive general thereon at the special electio, n held on ...... ....................... 19 ......... in accordance with the applicable annual '~ provisions of law. (Subject to permissive referendum, and final adoption because no valid petition filed requesting referendum.) ! hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No ......... of 19 ........ County of the City of was duly passed by the .......... Town ........... (Name of Legislative Body) Village not disapproved on ............................. 19 ........and was approved by the ............................ repassed after disapproval Elective Chief Executive Officer* on ..................... .... ...... ... 19 .......... Such local law being subject to a permissive referendum and no valid petition requesting such referendum having been filed, said local law was deemed duly adopted on ............................. 19 ........ , in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. *Elective Chief Executive Officer means or includes the chief executive officer of a county elected on a county-wide basis or, ii' there be none, the chairman of the county legislative body, the mayor o! a city or vifiage or the supervisor o! a town where such officer is vested with power to approve or veto local laws or ordinances. (2) (City local law concerning Charter revision proposed by petition.) I hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No ......... of 19 ........ of the City of ................................. having been submitted to referendum pursuant to the provisions of i;~ of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and having received the affirmative vote of a · special majority of the qualified electors of such city voting thereon at tl~e general election held on ............ ............ 19 ......... became operative. 6. (County local law concerning adoption o! Charter.) 1 hereby certify that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law No ......... of 19 ......... of lhe County of .......... , .......... , State of New York, having been submitted to the Electors at the General Election of November ............ ,19 ...... , pursuant to subdivisions 5 and 7 of section 33 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and having received the affirmative vote of a majority of the qualified electors of lhe cities of said county as a unit and of a majority of the qualified electors of the towns of said county considered as a unit voting at said general election, became operative. (If any other authorized form of final adoption has been followed, please provide an appropriate certifica- tion.) 1 further certify that ! have compared the preceding local law with the original onfile in this office and that the same is a correct transcript therefrom and of the whole of such original local law, and was finally adopted in the manner indicated in paragraph ...... .I ..... above. : Date: August 2, 1989 Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk (Seal) ' t/ \\ (Certification to be executed DJ County Attorney, Corporation Counsel, Town Attorney, Village Attorney or other authorized Attorney of locality.) --- STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF .... .S. LIEEQLK .............. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing local law contains the correct text and that all proper proceedings have been had or taken for the enac~.lmgnt of the local law a~a.nexed hereto. ' ...... ........ Signature Robert H, Berntsson, Assistnnt Town Attorney Title Date: August 2, 1989 Town of .... .Sp.u. th. ~I0 ................ TOWN OF ~OUTHOLD Suffolk Coun~. New York 516- 765-1801 , , . . _ SOUTHOLD PLANNING e~_e.done this one. Ms. Spir~u didn't start the Lead Agency. ~r. W ra d: We ~ do the. Lead Agency? ~r. ~D~nald: I m ad.motion to take the La Mr. Ward: O.K.. ~ Determinat~2221*************~*~*** Agency. Mr. Ward: Harvest Homes Estate~ ~ion Two - This major subdivision is for eleven lot: ~.~acres located on Oaklawn Avenue and Wells Ave in South~ld. SCTM #1000-70-3-22. Mr. McDonald: Mr. Cha I would like to~ake a motion. RESOLVED that .~ .1,~ Town Planning~Bd~rd, acting under the State E~ irol ~1 Quality Review Act,Rake a determination of/h~ n-s [cance, and grant a Neg~ive Declaration./ ~ Mr. ?~ ~,.~ade a~d seconded. All t~ ~ f~or?~ ~e~ ~. ~l~i, Mr. Ward, Mr. McDonal~ Mr~ath~. ~ / CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION Io$- I- i%z Mr. Ward: Reynold and Herman Blum - Are the petitioner's here? O.K.. Petition for a change of zone from Residential-Office ("R-O") District to General Business ("B") District on certain property located on the southerly side of NYS Route 25, Cutchogue, New York. SCTM #1000-103-1-19.2. Does the applicant which is before the Town Board wish to present your application to us as the Planning Board? Mr. Blum: Yes sir. I know you haven't had a chance to look at the maps or anything but I thought I would just address the Board and tell you a little bit about why I am doing this. I have approached the Town Board asking for a Zone change on the property we have there on the south side of the highway and the general reason is to basically improve the existing business I have which is Peconic Bay Vineyards. I want to establish a gourmet cheese and craft shop to go along with the winery that SOUTHOLD PLANNING B~ 7 FEBRUARY 993 we have there and also a cafe that would serve local food and wine. The present zoning is R-O which is really out of place in this area, the area is commercially zoned across the street and next door and it is not really conducive to residential use. By establishing both the gourmet cheese and craft shop I would like to offer local tourists and local people other products and a wider spectrum of products in the cafe featuring fresh local food and the wine that I produce. I expect to expand another dimension into Cutchogue since there is really no fine eating establishment in the Town other than the Fisherman's Rest. and they really only have pizza and things like that but really what you would consider gourmet local food. I want to use the existing property and buildings to hopefully its highest and best use. It is kind of a nice tranquil setting at the present time and I want to use the existing buildings and make it into something that is consistent with the area. Mr. Ward: Any questions from the Board? Mr. McDonald: You are talking about a wine and~nd perhaps some sort of an eating establishment. ~ You~have approximately almost six acres, five and one-hai-f~, six acres? Mr. Blum: That is correct. Mr. McDonald: You feel you need all of that for a wine and cheese shop? Mr. Blum: Well, as I said the rest of the area there, parking is certainly a consideration and my immediate plans were probably to make the house into the cafe similar to, if you ever get over to Shelter Island, there is Coven's Country Kitchen which is the same type of' building with a few tables inside and then with the out buildings use them for wine sales and the cheese and craft shop. Mr. McDonald: Are there two separate parcels there now? Mr. Blum: Yes, I own one and m~ father owns the other one. Mr. McDonald: Do you anticipate some other use on the other parcel in the business, in the deed, because you are asking for a change on that as well, right? Mr. Blum: Yes, the parcel at this time that I am selling wine out of is where I am planning on putting the craft shop in there and moving wine sales over into the other complex. Mr. McDonald: But, you must envision some use for the other parcel right. Mr. Blum: That is the craft and gift shop. At the present time, that is our retail wine outlet. What I find now is people come in and they come into the wine outlet and then say, where SOUTHOLD PI2~NNING 8 FEBRUARY ~ 9 9 3 is the winery, they want to look, they want to see barrels and tanks and look through a glass window and things like that so I '~ want to move the wine sales over by the winery which is the large building behind the house. Mr. McDonald: What is the house presently being used for? Mr. Blum: It is presently rented to a family. Mr. McDonald: It is one family? Mr. Blum: It's one family right. I had a considerable difficult time in trying to rent that place also. Everybody that came up told me that they have a cat, a dog, or children that were all going to have problems with the highway out there and the family I have in there now, although they are happy to live in there, they were not necessarily my first choice but I had to go with that. Mr. McDonald: They couldn't be any worse than the kids that used to live there. Mr. Orlowski: Hey!. Mr. Blum: When the kids used to live there the traffic wasn't the same but as someone else told me a few years ago when we were talking about residential use in this area, with King Kullen across the street at night time you can practically read a newspaper until midnight when they turn the lights off. Now, one of the things that I am looking at, I am not looking at something that is going to have night lights like that but I'm looking at a afternoon lunch type affair. Mr. McDonald: You felt that you need to be all the way to the back of the property? Mr. Blum: No, it is not the back of the property. Mr. McDonald: I mean the back of what is presently zoned for the R-O. Mr. Blum: That is correct. That line happens to be coexistent.with Braun's on the next side so it just followed the property line. Mr. Ward: Did you happen to look at the "LB" Zone? Is there a reason you are asking for a "B" verses the "LB"? Mr. Blum: I looked at it and I really couldn't understand what the differences were between the two. Mr. Ward: There are things that you kind of described are things that were intended to be in the "LB" Zone rather than an SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOw 9 FEBRUARY 8, 93 intensive building out to property lines which almost the "B" zone allows for. Mr. Blum: I did look at that and quite frankly I couldn't see too much of a difference between the two. You can offer a suggestion on that aspect. Mr. McDonald: Does "LB" allowed a restaurant? Mr. Ward: I think it does. Mr. McDonald: I am not sure you can get the use on that. Mr. Ward: I think you can. Mr. Blum: I did see that everything surrounding is all "B" with the exception of on the corner of Cox Lane, Kaelin's, the back section there was "LB". Mr. McDonald: The adjacent property to you is "RO" as well right, the adjacent property to the East? Mr. Blum: Yes, the property to the East is "RO" and to the West is "B". Mr. McDonald: Then it goes back to "RO" on the way back into (inaudible) yes or no? Mr. Blum: No, there is no other "RO" in the area. believe the next "RO" is down by Alvah's Lane. Mr. Ward: Valerie, the "LB" allows for the restaurant use doesn't it? Ms. Scopaz: I don't recall. I would have to go check. Mr. Ward: Thank you very much. Mr. McDonald: I just have a question. Do you feel that this is the difference as to whether your business makes it or not? Mr. Blum: We are making it now but it will certainly improve the viability. I don't have the highest exposure. When you think of Long Island wines, you don't think of Peconic Bay first. You think of Pindar or one of the larger operations over there who produce fine quality hand crafted wines. By joining them with a cafe and gourmet foods and things like that I am hoping that the business will certainly, change and be more profitable for us. We can always use more exposure. I constantly get requests from people asking where they can go to eat for lunch and I look around and I say if you are heading west I can send you to the Jamesport Country Kitchen and if you are heading east during the day time I'm asking myself is SOUTHOLD PLANNING 10 FEBRUARY 1993 Ross' open or not, I'm not sure or I'll say well maybe you can try Armando's. There isn't too much in there. Mr. McDonald: The property that the vineyard sits on is attached to one or both of these lots? Mr. Blum: It is part of the western parcel, it is all joined. That is one piece. Mr. McDonald: The larger barn is yours? Mr. Blum: Which is the larger barn? Mr. McDonald: Do you anticipate anytime in the future separating this property? Mr. Blum: Separating them? I don't have any thoughts along that line at all. Mr. McDonald: So the idea is, you would like to make your business more viable to try to help you do what you need to do to continue to grow as a vineyard. That would mean that the attachment of these two parcels is useful in the future for the continuants of the vineyard because it supports it and that is your intent? Mr. Blum: Absolutely, I cannot cut off my frontage on the highway. Mr. McDonald: Thank you. Mr. Kiernan: Mr. Chairman, I would like to ask a question. Blum, do you have an attorney representing you on this? Mr. Blum: Not right now. Mr. Mr. Kiernan: I don't mean to imply that you do need one but there may be ways to speed up the process a little bit. I don't know if you are planning new construction on the lot which you propose a zone change but possibly if you had a site plan application that you wanted to submit concurrently with the zone change application, it could save you time in the long run. The Planning Board might be able to tack it on with a super analysis on the zone change as well. Mr. Blum: Time is obviously a criteria and I approached an architectural firm and asked them about doing a site plan on this and there advise to me was that they would be more than happy to do this but why should we get involved in something like this if the zone change is not going to come along. Why throw good money away? Mr. Kiernan: Just a consideration. SOUTHOLD PLANNING 11 FEBRUARY 1993 Mr. Blum: O.K. sure. I guess you are also aware of the fact that this application is $1000.00 dollars to start with and it · is something I seriously thought about and I do want to go through with it and I didn't know if I needed an attorney to do such an application. I didn't feel that I probably needed one but certainly if it can speed things up, I am interested. But, then once again to go and spend a lot of money on all kinds of plans just to put them on the shelf. Mr. Kiernan: Maybe I opened a can of worms. I not meaning to imply that you need one. Mr. Ward: Alright, thank you very much. Mr. Ward: Also on our agenda tonight we have Mr. Ralrnor to discuss Peconic Homes. Mr. Raynor: It is interesting to sit here and listen to Mrl Blum expound about why he needs some form of light business. Not that this has anything to do with Peconic Homes but it reminds me about twelve years ago when the Board stood up and said we recommend some form of light business in the exact location that Mr. Blum is indicating. Meanwhile Peconic Homes at present is seeking some guidance from the Board and you are aware that there are two brothers and principals involved with this forty five acre tract of property. It has been on off, on off, for nine or ten years and I think finally we are heading in some direction. Not that I have been involved with it for that length of time, it probably would have been longer if I was involved in it. But, the brothers have finally reached a decision pending the disposition of this Board that they would take the forty five acres on which one of them presently has residence, develop four lots in a minor subdivision mode given a variance with regard to road construction, they would intend to have the existing right of way which meanders through their property and down to the lake to others in Laurel. A gravel road in keeping, actually an improvement of what is there today if you are familiar with the Laurel Lake right of way. The greenhouse operation on the northwesterly section of the property they would like to section off to utilize as just that. A greenhouse operation to compromise approximately twelve acres at its maximum disposal. The remainder of the property they would be willing to covenant and restrict, be put into a form of development rights acquisition be it either Town, County or any other agency. If the Board does not feel that this is the proper way to go, that it does not fit with the plans that are ongoing in the area, that they foresee to be ongoing in the area, then obviously they would be willing to withdraw this plan and go on a major subdivision approach which would yield somewhere in the neighborhood of twenty homes. I understand that there has been some questions and confusion that has been with the principals themselves in trying to decide which way SOUTHOLD PLANNING 21 FEBRUARY 1993 Mr. Ward: Ms. Scopaz would like to say something but before that, is that the intent of the affordable housing program in this Town is not to allow it to go throughout the Town but to be concentrated in the hamlet areas within a half a mile essentially the post office so, you wouldn't see this, you are calling it a down zoning, an increased density happening out on a farmland someplace, you know what I am saying in that sense. So, it's the guidelines of the program force it to be within the confines of quote, the hamlets. Ms. Scopaz: In answer to your question, you should be aware that the Town of Southold is working on other things. The Planning Board is not involved in them. Jim McMahon, is the director of Community Development and works with the North Fork Housing Alliance and together they work to get Federal and State Funding and they have been rehabilitating houses for many, many years and they do this sort of thing. They buy run down properties and they renovate them and then they rent them or they sell them. They work with landlords to upgrade properties and I don't believe that there are that many foreclosures on the North Fork but, I am sure Jim McMahon would be able to answer your questions. There is a significant amount of money that is being used for that. (Inaudible). Ms. Northum: Thank you. Mr. Blum: I just would ask for an answer to a question. · With reference to the depth of the property. It is 327 feet to this point here and in the past the Town has looked at 400 feet as being the maximum set back off of the highway. Mr. Ward: It varies. Mr. Blum: The other thing is that at some point you or Valerie could tell me what else if anything the Planning Board would need from me. Mr. Ward: Well, if in fact a zone change goes through, your next step would be if you are going to make improvements there, you would need a site plan and you would come before the site Plan reviewers. Mr. Blum: Is there anything between now and the time that the Town Board acts on this that you will need? Mr. McDonald: They will ask us for our recommendation but right now there is nothing else to really be done. I guess if we had further questions, we would probably contact the Town Board. Mr. Ward: Yes, our response would be through the Town Board. SOUTHOLD PLANNING B~ 22 FEBRUARY ,1993 Mr. Blum: O.K., thank you. · Mr. Ward: Any other business? Board: No further business. Mr. Latham: I move we adjourn. Mr. Ward: All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. McDonald. Mr. Ward: Motion carried. Being there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Respectfully s~bmitted, Jane Rousseau, Secretary Richard Ward, Chairman APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 10, 1992 P~ SCOTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Mr. Reynold Blum Peconic Bay Vineyards P.O. Box 709 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Appl. No. 4113 - Variance to Remove Condition Dear Mr. Blum: Please find attached a copy of the findings and determination rendered by the Board of Appeals in the above matter at our June 30, 1992 Regular Meeting. Copies of this determination have also been forwarded to the Building Department and Planning Board for their update and permanent recordkeeping. Very truly yours, Linda Kowalski lk Enclosure cc: Building Department (Attn: Victor Lessard) Planning Board (Attn: Bennett Orlowski)~ JUL I 4 1992 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. James Dinizio, Jr. Robert A. Villa Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Mifm Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Appl. No. 4113. Upon Application of REYNOLD BLUM (PECONIC BAY VINEYARDS, INC.) Request to remove Condition No. 1 under Special Exception No. 3346 rendered May 23, 1985 which reads "No sleeping or living quarters." A conversion is proposed on the second floor of the winery structure from office use to a residence in this Residential-Office (RO) Zone District. The previous zoning of this property was "A-80 Residential and Agricultural." Location of Property: 31320 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY; also referred to as Parcel #1 approved by the Planning Board 6/2/80; County Tax Map Parcel Designation 1000-103-01-part of 19.11. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 30, 1992, at which time all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded (see separate verbatim transcript of hearing); and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and docUmentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, the surrounding areas; and and WHEREAS, the Board made the. following Findings of Fact: 1. By this application, applicant requests removal of a condition imposed by the Board of Appeals on May 23, 1985 under the Special Exception permit issued for the establishment of a winery at the subject premises. 2. The premises in question is known and referred to as Lot #1 of the Subdivision approved by the Southold Town Planning Board on June 2, 1980, having a total area of 24.249 acres with frontage of 357.23 feet along the southerly side of the Main Road (Route 25) and 198.62 feet along the easterly side of Stillwater Avenue. This parcel is shown on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 102, Block 01, Lot 19.11. -P~ge 2 - Appl. No. 410 ~ ~Application of REYNOLD--BL~ Decision Rendered June 30, 1992 3. The subject premises is improved with a two-story winery structure presently set back at 165+- feet from the front property line (along the Main Road), and its principal use is winery as established under Special Exception permit #3346 approved May 23, 1985. The site plan for the winery was endorsed by the Planning Board Chairman on September 6, 1985, and that maps shows the land area to be 2.90 acres. 4. The land upon which this winery is located and upon which the second-floor, single-family dwelling unit is to be established is located in the Residential-Office (RO) Zone District. The RO Zone requires a minimum land area of 40,000 sq. ft. each for single-family dwelling use and 40,000 sq. ft. of land area for non-residential use (ref. Bulk Schedules). There is no question that the total land area for the combined winery and single-residential unit meets the minimum lot area requirements for this newly established RO Zone. (Prior to January 10, 1989, the land was located in the "A-80" Residential Zone District, minimum land area of 80,000 sq. ft. per principal use.). 5. Specifically, for the record, Condition No. 1 of the Special Exception rendered May 23, 1985 states: "...No sleeping or living quarters in the winery structure or accessory buildings (except that one separate one-family dwelling may be permitted in compliance with all codes) .... " 6. In this area variance, the Board has considered the following: (a) the character of the neighborhood will not be undesirably changed by the grant of this variance to remove this condition; (b) the parcel is ample for a winery use in conjunction with a residential unit without the necessity of substantial physical changes to the parcel or site plan layout; (c) there is no viable alternative for appellants to pursue, other than a variance; (d) the practical difficulties claimed are uniquely related to the property and have not been self-created by the owner; (e) the amount of relief requested is minimal under the circumstances; -P_age 3 - Appl. No. 41~ '[Application of REYNOL~S~B~ Decision Rendered June 30, 1992 (e) there will be no substantial increase in population density or increased burden on public facilities by the grant of the relief requested; (f) the interests of the landowner is not outweighed when compared to the interests of the public welfare; the interests of justice will be served by the grant of the relief requested. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a variance to remove Condition No. 1 under Special Exception permit No. 3346 issued May 23, 1985, as requested for the establishment of a single-family dwelling unit in conjunction with principal winery use. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Dinizio, Villa and Goehringer. This resolution was duly adopted. lk June 1, 1993 Scott Harris, Supervisor Southold Town Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RECFIVFD JUN 1 1993 Dear Supervisor Harris and members of the Town Board; I would like to take this opportunity to respond to the letter and petition forwarded to your office by Mr. Levin reference the US/UK Task Force recommendations for wineries and its subsequent effect on my re-zoning application. Mr Levin's letter joins both my re-zoning application and the Task Force recommendations and implies that any aCtion to modify the wineries sales room abilities will stifle and force existing restaurants out of business. When in fact the wineries have been operating hmmoniously with retail wine and liquor stores both selling local wine for over a decade and have been the major industry responsible for increasing tourism on the East End and bringing business to the restaurants. My re-zoning application should not be confused with the recent Task Force recommendations regarding wineries. All the other wineries are located in and surrounded by other agricultural zoned properties often having sold their development rights. My property is currently zoned Office- Residential not Agricultural and is situated in a predominantly business zoned area. A zone change on my property is completely independent of other wineries and is isolated by its unique location and existing zoning. It would be virtually impossible and inappropriate for the other wineries to secure a zone change from agricultural to business. Additionally as you are aware: -1-The Suffolk County Planning Board has declared my petition to have no adverse effect. -2-The Consulting firm Cramer, Voorhis & Associates hired by the Town of Southold has declared" the existing site seems incongruous with the purpose of the R-O Zoning .... given the fact that the area is not essentially residential. "It is noted that the Master Plan_U_p_date outlines the site as General Business in the Land Use Plan." < ~--~ SOUTHOLD TO~N PLANNING BOARD forgoing facts relating to land use and zoning, the present site zoning could be considered for modification. '~ Once again this is not to be confused with the Task Force Recommendations. I fail to see why my re-zoning application has been tabled awaiting a town wide poll on those recommendations which have nothing to do with my request. It is a zone application for one specific parcel and not combined in any way with any of the other wineries or businesses on the North Fork. A favorable decision would not set any precedents in relation to other wineries because of the uniqueness of my current property location, status and zoning. The Town Board should consider my application on its own merits and not further confuse it with the Task Force Recommendations. Sincerely, Main Road CutchOgue, New York 11935 July 23, 1990 Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Peconic Bay Vineyards SCTM# 1000-103-1-19.2 Dear Mr. Orlowski: With reference to your letter to me dated March 29, 1990, I am fowarding the enclosed map~with Suffolk County Health Department approval. Please continue expeditiously the processing of my application. Sincerely, President Box 709 Main Road, Cutchogue, Long Island, N.Y. 11935 (516) 734-7361 C(?CHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 Telephone (516) 7344907 April 18, 1990 Hr Bennet Orlowski, Jr. Seuthold Town Planning Bd. Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Ref. Peconie Bay Vineyard. Dear Mr. Orlowski, Reference the above estate and map. It is the opinion of the Board that a well is not required at this time. If there are any changes, please advise. Yours truly, Board of Fire Commissioners Matthew J. ~Martin Secretary mJm/ To.wn Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD · 1990 SCOFF L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Mathew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Martin: Enclosed please find (2) surveys F,~-' ~ ~/~ ~/~, ~ Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by~p~k ~ 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. · ~ ' enc. hp ,~gry trul¥,Hours~ Bennett Orlo~ski, Jr. Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SCOFF L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 1~.~/~ April 5, 1990 Site Plan for Peconic Bay Vineyards SCTM# 1000-103-1-19.2 Attached for your review and certification is the map for Peconic Bay Vineyards. Encl. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOFF L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 March 29, 1990 Reynold F. Blum P.O. Box 709 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Peconic Bay Vineyards SCTM# 1000-103-1-19.2 Dear Mr. Blum: The Planning Board will require Health Department approval on the five copies of your final map. This requirement has been discussed with your architects Samuels and Steelman. If you have any questions or require further assistance please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Samuels and Steelman, Architects APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER. CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI JAMES DINIZIO, JR. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD. L.I.. N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appl. NO. 3898 Matter of PECONIC BAY VINEYARDS. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section 100-71 B (6), for permission to use existing barn for winery production and storage. Property Location: 32180 Main Road, Cutchogue, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 103, Block 01, Lot 19.2. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on February 1,.1990 in the matter of the Application of PECONIC BAY VINEYARDS under Appeal No. 3898; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. The premises in question is located along the south side of Main Road, Town of Cutchogue, and is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 100, Section 103, Block 01, Lot 19.2. 2. This is an application for a Special Exception from the Zoning Code Article VII, Section 100-71 B (6), for .permission to use existing barn for winery production and storage. Page 2 - Appl. No. 3898 Matter of PECONIC BAY VINEYARDS Decision rendered February 15, 1990 3. Article VII, Section 100-71 B (6), The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the Board of Appeals as hereinafter provided and subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board, provided that not more than one (1) use shall be allowed for each forty thousand (40,000) squ~re feet of lot area: (6) Wineries. 4. The premises in question contains a total acreage in excess of 2.783 Acres (121,288 sq. ft.), in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold. 5. The subject premises is located in a Residential Office (RO) Zone District. 6. In considering this application, the Board finds and determines: (a) that the use will not prevent the orderly and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in adjacent use districts; (b) that the special exception will not in turn cause a substantial effect on the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience and/or order of the Town; (c) that in carefully considering the record and all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the special exception, as applied conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Special Exception in the matter of the application of PECONIC BAY VINEYARDs as applied under Appeal No. 3898, for the use of existing accessory structures, excluding the farm stand, for the production and storage of wine. Accordingly, wine production will primarily take place in largest structure on premises, which is existing large barn. Vote of the Board Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Dinizio, (Absent Joseph Sawicki and Serge Doyen). resolution was duly adopted. Grigonis, and This df GERARD P. GOEHRI~NGER,~. Cg~IRMAN Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) '765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chai'rman Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman DATE: February 1, 1990 RE: Peconic Bay Vineyards SCTM# 1000-103-1-19.2 The following is in response to your request of January 29, 1990 for comments on Appeal No. 3898 Peconic Bay Vineyards. The Planning Board is in favor of this request for a special exception. The Site Plan shows the use of a barn on an existing farm for wine processing in conjunction with the adjacent property. The adjacent property is a winery processing and retail sa-les operation that received site plan approval and a special exception in 1985. The use of a barn for wine processing on an existing farm will not cause a more intensive use of this property. Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Date 1-19-9'0 This notice is issued pursuant to part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Peconic Bay Vineyards SCTM#: 1000-103-1-19.2 Location: south side of Main Road, (NYS Route 25) between Harbor Lane and Stillwater Avenue, Cutchogue/ Southold. SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Description of Action: Yes ( ) No (X) Site Plan shows use of barn on existing farm to be used for wine processing in conjunction with adjacent property. The adjacent property is.a vineyard processing and retail sales operation. Existing single family residence and farm stand are to maintain current uses. Reasons Supporting This Determination: The use of a barn for wine processing on an existing farm will not cause a more intensive use of this property. An Environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Robert Green, DEC Commissioner Mohabir Perseud, Department of State Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Applicant Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 19, 1990 Reynold F. Blum P. O. Box 709 Main Rd. Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Peconic Bay Vineyards SCTM# 1000-103-1-19.2 Dear Mr. Blum: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Thursday, January 18, 1990. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act do an Uncoordinated Review, take Lead Agency, and in that capacity make a determination of non-signifiance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. / '~ Chairman Encl. -~Ca /~: ;Z0o% lU 5u f.F, Co. r,',~ /~i'ae( ,taao -/o~- t - ic~(p.) ,~ O zone e~-ce,~r' as ~4o~u~ Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($t6) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 31, 1989 Mr. Ray Blum Peconic Bay Vineyards Box 709 Main Road, Cutchogue Long Island, N.Y. 11935 RE: Proposed expansion of Peconic Bay winery SCTM# 1000-103-1-19 Dear Mr. Blum: As recently discussed, the Planning Board has reviewed your proposal and makes the following comments: An amended site plan is required showing the additional property and the existing and proposed uses of all buildings. The site plan should contain all of the elements as contained in article XXV of the Town Code. A copy of your letter has been foEwarded to the Board of Appeals for their review. fy'truly y urs,o ' '" ":'"~ ""f BENNETT O~OWSKI, JR. C~I~ rgk August 15, 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: I would like to obtain an extension of my special exception to operate a winery to the property adjacent to my property at: 31280 Main Road, Cutchogue, New York. Is it necessary to file a new application with the Planning Board and a new site plan, since the properties are contiguous? I plan on using the existing retail sales building as is and the new building for production only. I also plan on using the existing access and parking, making only a change in use for the buildings on the new parcel. Please see the drawing enclosed. Please advise on how to proceed. RB:lcr Sincere ly, Ray Blum President Box 709 Main Road, Cutchogue, Long Island, N.Y. 11935 (516) 734-7361 ! ! - Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD November 14, 1989 Reynold F. Blum P.O. Box 709 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Peconic Bay Vineyards SCTM #1000-103-1-19.2 Dear Mr. Blum: The Planning Board has reviewed the above referenced proposal. The following changes must be made before the Planning Board can proceed: The site plan most show both parcels on the same map. Parking calculations must be shown on the map for all uses on the sites. If you have any questions or require additional assistance, please don't hesitate to call this office. truly - ,~ yours Bennett Orlowski, Jr. F. Chairman cc: Nancy Steelman SECTION-BLOCK-LOT TAX ~LAP NUMBERS ~:IDATE, NORTH POINT AND WRITTEN & GRAPHIC SCALE :~:,DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY & INFORMATION TO DEFINE BOUNDARIES LOCATIONS, NAMES & EXISTING WIDTHS OF ADJACENT STREETS & CURBS iiLOCATION & OWNERS OF ALL ADJOINING LANDS, AS SItOWN ON TAX RECORDS ' LOCATION & PURPOSE OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS '"--'~!COMPLETE OUTLINE OF EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS APPLYING TO PROPERTY i'iEXISTING ZONING !AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOODING OR STORM WATER OVERFLOWS iWATER COURSES, MARSHES, WOODED AREAS, TREES 8" IN DIAMETER OR MORE 'iANY BUILDING WITHIN 100' OF PROPERTY i PAVED AREASt SIDEWALKS, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO PUBLIC STREETS 'EXISTING SEWERSt CULVERTS, WATERLINES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO PROPERTY PROPOSED BUILDII'IGS OR STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS it OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS 'i OUTDOOR LIGItTING OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS OUTDOOR SIGNS' 'x~ !i~ 239K SIDEWALKS LOCATIONS WIDTHS: SIZE OF WATER AND SEWER LINES LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amen_d_edSite-P-tm SPFile Type: Approved Proiect Type: Site Plans Status: Final Approval SCTM #: 1000 - 103.-1-19.2 Project Name: Peconic Bay Winery 1990 Address: NYS Route 25, Cutchoque Hamlet: Cutcho.que Applicant Name: Reynold Blum Owner Name: Herman Blum Zone 1: Approval Date: 8/13/1990 Records Management IS OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 8/13/1990 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: s/e/s/o NYS Route 25, between Harbor Lane & Stillwater Avenue, in Cutchogue SC Filin.q Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Aqreement: SCAN Date: SITE DATA SCTM #1000-103-1-19.2 OWNER: HERMAN BLUM 3904 COLONIAL BOULEVARD EAST NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34652 ADJACENT LAND OWNERS: FRANK CICHANOWICZ HAIN ROAD PECONIC, NY 11958 REYNOLD F. BLUM PO BOX 709 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 ARCHITECTS: SAMUELS & STEELHAN ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NY 11936 516-734-6405 Site Plan taken from survey RODERICK VAN TUYL License ~LS 25626 Dated: 03/17/77 prepared by: Existing Zoning: Residential Office (RO) Existing Building Area: 6,975 S.P. Existing Lot Area: 2,783 Acres, 121,228 S.F. .Existing Lot Coverage: 5.8% PA~KING REQUIREMENTS FARM STAND: 4 SPACES RESIDENCE: 2 SPACES STORAGE: i PER 1,000 SQ.FT. 600+392+1200=2192 SQ.FT. * 1000=2.2 SPACES LIGHT INDUSTRIkL: 1 PER 500 SQ.FT. 2415 SQ.FT. * 500= 4.8 SPACES TOTAL SPACE~ REQUIRED: 13 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 15 BOARD SITE PLAN SP-1 SITE DATA SCTM $1000-103-1-19.2 OWNER: NERMAN BLUM 3904 COLONIAL BOULEVARD EAST NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34652 ADJACENT LAND OWNERS: FRANK CICHANOWICZ MAIN ROAD PECONIC, NY 11958 SCTM $1000-103-1-19.3 REYNOLD F. BLUM PO BOX 709 CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 SCTM $1000-103-1-19.11 ARCHITECTS: SAMUELS & STEELMAN ARCHITECTS 25235 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, NY 11936 516-734-6405 Site Plan taken from survey RODERICK VAN TUYL License tLS 25626 Dated: 03/17/77 Existing Zoning: Existing Building Area: Existing Lot Area: Existing Lot Coverage: prepared by: Residential Office (RO) 6,975 S.F. 2,783 Acres, 121,228 S.F. 5.8% PARKING REQUIREMENTS 4 SPACES 2 SPACES 1 PER lt000 SQ.FT. FARM STAND~ RESIDENCE: STORAGE: 600+392+1200=2192 SQ.FT. * 1000=2.2 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL~ i PER 500 SQ.FT. 2415 SQ.FT. * 500= 4.8 SPACES TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 13 TOTA~ SPACES PROVIDED= 15 SPACES J J ~PLE SITE PLAN CUTOBO6LJt: I-h{~ ~!,, ' ,, 0. BOX t NOV 2 9 ;989 >, Checked By NG Date. d:~_,,T, o_, icld:~d Scale I"= 20'-0" Sheet T~tle SITE PLAN Sheet No: SP-1