Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-83.-3-4.6 2: o It - "" z!- o~ Q W !- -<: u o ~ <t:i J>::W 0"'"' l1..W If') I'>:: --<: 2::::> <0 ..JV"l ll. l:.l l- v", If') :t: Z I- _ ;-~... ~'i'I~~. _"~~ .~~ t l\,;.,:. .. 'rt \ ~ ;..; Zoning Board of Appeals . (written c~mments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees I SITE PLAN Presub mission con[ erence (within 30 days of written request) Complete application received (within 4 months of presub. conference) Application reviewed at work session (within 10 days of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions' (within 30 days of review) Revised submission received / Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination I g REFERRED TO: o - Building Department (certification) . Suffolk County Department of Planning Department of Transportation -State Department of Transportation - County Suffolk County Dept. of Health Fire Commissioners RECEIVED: Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape plan Lighting plan Curb Cut approval Health approval Drainage plan Reviewed by Engineer Approval of site plan' -with conditions Endorsement of sile'plan . ., " .....-.--.,..... Cenificale of Occupancy inspection One year review '/ - '1-16 ) '1 - / {. - '1 (, INii'4 lQX1 ~~ ~~ '1-/7-1(, ) r;zinlrn:l ~~ r;zinlrn:l ~~ ~~ r;zinlrn:l ~~ ~ I~l' ~ IC&Rl r;zinlrn:l ~~ fiUmrn:l ~~ fiUmrn:l ~~ Sent: Received' r;zinlrn:l ~~ r;zinlrn:l ~~ r;zinlr,;;;, ~~ r;zinlr,;;;, ~~ f.<OO'rJr;;::; ~tE.."-1 f'Wt1rn:l ~~ [.iro1Jr;:;, ~~ -..,t..- , /Nii1Jr,;:, ~~ ~'1 f(;;l . j ~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS " RICHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS _New _Change of Use Re- use _Extension _Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: Location: Address: Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: Agent or Person responsible for application: Address: Telephone: Site plans prepared by: License No.: Address: Telephone: ~~::::.;,..'>-: JY:. -~<;'llfFaL,r~~ vs::.."~ y~ ~ ~a. =-"~; ~VJ .. :i:j \~~ . !'; X~Oj :!Ir ~~ ~::z:::c9'- .Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone{516) 765-1938 Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPUCATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PlAN I~ r AUG 2 9 !gar i I 1--. I ~<: . I____f,. N6t."fU FoL'" ~ErSo~Lq1'" ~ <05<"15 ('oll L.ION~ - 1'2..6'Z..O Oe.c.((yON '2oll.).,O C l.ol~olT'-\l{ N,Y. 2.1(~1WU) ?1l...;NC.;/J; --:r~. . 7.0 _ ~i S2..~ AN,;)'1IWStfr-r N. Y. J t((30 ~~1- ,52-5 ~tl:t. e\CJoJ1HlO ~1""C.lf' '"TilL 052. ~u. A>vI;r. P.oJr.I<j~~ "',y. 11'1'52... 5~1-7'5'2-S >.".w N~a PtftONi(, 'S\.At-\lryoe.-S ~.e.~ e(J,~-r,,-, 4q(018 ~ 2.0 L::Nl' I...AIJNI(' 'N t>r-r-r,--rl-t a... N ' Y t t 95 2- 2.'f'O-'BLJ'2..0 . , . , Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application APPUCANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK '2lC-~ PQ.lllolC.tp I "3"12.. being duiy sworn, deposes and says that he resides at \/.0. ~ -:z,2~ ~4NSC'TT !\J.Y I ,q~ in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above property, or that he is the ?p~ (Title) of the NoQ.,jU ~ ~o.t2.~ ~<:. (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, inclUding all rights.of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed In strict accordance with the plans submitted. Signed?--.J d- r IOwner) Signed t1c.. f (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) Sworn to me this day of 19_ (Notary Publici . . . < Page 3 Planning Board Site Plan Application Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Zoning District . EXisting Use of Site W~~ / ~ I Proposed Use of Site '5"'tO/l.I3qV ~O ~&,t.. MA-rrrtil1Xl; ~-roll.Aglf I NA.~I~ ~~/AJ~ 1'2.. '500 Gross Floor P\re<f of Existing Structure(s) . Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) '5"",0 Percent of Lot Coverage by Buildlng<s) ;e 9'"0 Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) (:. ~1-'(() )'ercent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) (0.'2. L"1:. T.uc..ca I "7"'fWrN7"., I Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by NO Board of Appeals - Case # & date N-C Board of Trustees - Case # & date NO NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date NO Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date - Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other "le> Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit - NO ACTION (EXCA VA TION OR CONSTRUCTION) MA Y BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. ~ .~'!~ ~:. ~ -.....'\ :+i 14-'6-4 (2187)- Text 12 [ PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) I 2. PROJECT NAME ""'S/Z.. I\.IOe.1Jf ~ .. I . SEaR ~.f ~. ?: ...",..... VI. e.c1fS - <1... 3. PROJECT LOCATION: MunicipaHly t"'o.-oN 'So.., T'/J<'''t.:J County S ..~...." 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street ad ess and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) eScrs Cole 4tNV- r 1'2-~2.-0 ol2.liC:roN '20. -rl'\.l M~ -:tJ: tO~-e3 -O~ -'-f.lP. 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: -.-/ o New 0 Expansion ~ Modification/alteration 6. DESC~'BE PRO~ECT BRIEFLY: . ~ Pa.cpo~ -c:o u.sc ~Ht;; V/fGI>^>T UNOeJVffl.J:::,ftt'P prcz-noA.> of "Tj.J./S ~ I"'T~ 04-1' \~S e.v..Uq~r ~8'VW7'~DNS ;;<> ""'1'c::c.IiC..Plur I <;.c.t.(MN / S~OVr(f dF 00;::1== <SITE;" N'miY2.IIU...c; (~rH p~,.c;. ~ rt:op56I'- / c;./flI-'fJ ~v<:n.... I\l1NO <b t'.Of"tT) . 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately Co .2. acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~s 0 No If No. des~ribe briefly 9. w~~ PRESENT LANE..!JBE IN VICINITY ~F poJECT? _/ C9'Aesidenttal crlndustrial 19'Commercial ~Agriculture 0 Park/Forest/Open space 0 Other Descrobe: "TlJ/S C;',-a-- ~~~ ~~ "'~S6""'THO"'!:> -P::...:>N l,.,griDF'II...t./A ~~I""q '3M-\I: IT' YIWJJ ~ "T1ge"" (....)WST L ~ A- ~ScftT" -r/'L,J9.HS CiT*Tu^, -t..;> T'I .. -r14. ~ L...j4lND ~ ~1....4r'c.- ~ Q.O. 10. DOES ACTION iNVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNOING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL. STATE OR LOCAL)? o Yes ~ If yes, list agency(sl and permit/approvals ~ ,.."". en ~ c of=. l.ASf"" No N.o1' A-'t .I4-IS P61Nl' \"" -r'M" ON'-',j AwO 51",,", PII}N ~ uV"'.... "c;. 'N~. 11. ~91!5 ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTlm' HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? T~ l ~ NOCM~;;:;::~ n;e a~;:",Vp<za~~ 0) Fs<<- IT- (AoOUl/O'1S,Q"" / ~. 12. A~SULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REOUIRE MODIFICATION? ~11~ /)I...~,. BYes DNo A ~ I..\S ~ AMI'ltCVOGO "". " VJ..,~ I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATI N PROVIDED IE S TRUE TO THE :S~F MY KN~~GE U . g,\~ ~ .t""""'C~1 Date: '0' ~" -C\ <P Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 .- PART II-ENVIRONMENTAL A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY DVes DNa B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COOROINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NVCRR, PART 617.6? may be superseded by another involved agency. DVes DNa C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quaJlty. surface or groundwater Quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain brietly: ESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCAR, PART 617.12? If yes, . nate the review process and use the FULL EAF. If No, a negative declaration C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeOlogical, historic. or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood cllaracter? explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. CG. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1.C5? Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use 01 either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? DYes 0 No If Yes, explain briefly PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIF:'CANCE (To be completed by Agency) . INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed In connection with Its (a) selling (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. o o Check this box if you have Identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY OCCL!<. lhen proceed directly to the FUll EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WilL NOr result in any. significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the' reasons supporting this determination: Name 01 lead Agency Print or Type Name ot ResponSible Officer in lead Agency Title of ResponSible Officer Signature 0; ResponSible Officer in lead AgencV Sianatu,e of Preparer (If different trom responsible office,) Date 2 ~, ,....... l - ~-t.16.2 (2"U7]-7c . SEQR 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM . {" Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderl'! manner, whether a proiect or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent. Iy, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureabJe. It is also understood that those who determine signIficance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware or the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EA,F is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies CJn be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive m nature, yet flexible to allow introduction oi information to iit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised or three pans: PJrt 1: Provides objective data and information about a given proiect and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. PJ.rt 2: Focu5es on identifYing the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance 3S to whether an impact is likely to be consIdered small to moderate or whether it is a poterltlally- large impact. The form also identifies whether ah Impact can be mitigated or reduced. . PJrt 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentiaily-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions ai EAF completed for this project: o Part 1 o Part 2 OPart 3 ( Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate], and any other su.pporring information, and considering both the magi tude and importance of each impact. it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: o A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant imptict on the environment. therefore a negative dedarJtion will be prepared. o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment. there will not be a significant effect ior this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures.descrlbed in PART 3 have been required, . therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' . o C. The project may result in one or morc large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a positive dcctaration will he prepared. 1t A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions ~e,ll~ Foe,,- j2.e;$O~ ~c.. Name of t\ction So,^"~P - . loc..>N BoolWU) Name or LeiJd Agency R,(.~ wNt-O ~V1~r'l.NlQ.tV Title or Rcsponslbie Officer Print or Type Name ot RespOllslblc Officer III Lead I\l',ency Signature of RcsPOnSlbl(~ Officer in Lt.',ld l\l:!'flCY Signdture 01 PrC~iJrc( (If different irom responSIble oriicerJ AI4.1~s-r 2~. I'tCHD "' Q,lte ~ ..... -- PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATIW. . Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed mav have a si~nificant errec on the environment. Please comolete the entire form, Parts A through E. I\nswers to these questions will be considere -as part of the application for approval and may be subiect to further verificJ.t:on and public review. ProvIde any addition2 information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2. and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently Jvadable and will not invoJv~ new studies. research or Investigation. I f information requirin~ such jdditional work is unav3i1able, so Indicate and speejf,- each instance. NAME OF ACTION lOCATION OF ACTION (lncluae Slreet Address, Municipality and County) NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSi,~ESS TEl.:?HONE ADDRESS crTY/PO i 5; A TE ! I ZIP CODE I NAME OF OWNER (If ailferenll 5US1NESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITYtPO S;;"TE I ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION ~ Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project. both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: DUrban Dlndustrial DCommercial C::~!sident'al (suburban) DForest DAgriculture DOther 2. Total acreage of project area: Jeres. APPROXIMA TE ACREAGE Meadow or Brush/and (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal "s per Mticles 24, 25 of ECLI Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock. earth or filll Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) ORural (non-farm PRESENTl Y AFTER CQ,\JPLETIQN Jcres acres Jcres acres Jcres acres acres Jcres .lcres acres ,lcres acres .lues acres ,leres acres 3. What is predominant <1. Sod drainJ.L:c: soil type(s) on nroject ,ite? CVVefr drJined % of "ite c.::Poorh' drJlnt't! % of Site b If Jny JgriculturaJ 1.1Ild IS Illvolvcd, how Ill,lny JUt'S of <;od <Ire cl.lsSlfit'd L.1nu Cla.sslfiCJtlon Systcml JereS (See 1 ,\JYC!~R 370j, CtvloderatC'ly we!! drJined % or 5ite within "ad group 1 throu;h .~ or the ;'1Y: 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on prolect 51i1~? ....:;. Whot is depth to bedrockl eYes eNo (in foeti 2 .~ .J. Approximate percenr~l:",:t..' or proposed project '>I(e with slopc-;" . 6. Is project sllbstantially contiguous to, or contain J building, site, or district. listed on the State or the l'1ational Registers of Historic PI.Jces? DYes DNo { 7..ls project substantial Iv contiguous to a site listed on the Re:";lster or l'1ational Natural Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, prinCipal, or sole SOurce aquifer? C=U-l0% % CJ-l()-15<?~ CJ-15~~ or~ ~~ . % DYes DNa eYes DNa 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities [1resentlv exist In the project area? eVes DNo 11. Does proiect site contain any species or plant or animal lire that is identified as threatened or endangered? DVes DNa According to Identify each species 12. Are there any DVes unique DNa or unusual land Describe forms on the project site? (i.e.. cliffs. dunes. other geological formations) 13. Is the project DYes ,ite presently used by the eNo If yes, explain community or neighborhood a5 an open space or recreation area? 14. Does the present site include scenIc views known to be important co the community? DVes DNa 1 S. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name or Stream and name of River to which It is tnbutarv 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. ( Is the site served by existing public utilities? DYes DNo a) I f Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b} If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DVes DVes eNo uNo ~ 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and ;v\arker.s Law. Article 2S.AA, Section 303 and 3041 DVes DNa 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6171 DVes DNa 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous WdS~? DVes 0',"0 B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlh:d by project sponsor ,lcres. b. Project. acreage to be developed: acres initi;dly; acrcs ultjm~tcly. c. Proiect acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. Length of prolect. in miles: (If appropriate) c. If the project is an expansion, indicJtc pcrn'nt of ('xpansio(l proposed %; f. Numh(:r of off-street parking 5paces eXlstilll: , propo'>ed g. Maximum vehicular trips gCl1t'r.1ced per hOllr (UpOll compft'tion ot project)? h. If reSIdential: Number and tvpe of hnusinl: llrlirs: Gnf' Family TWll f:Olrndv ;\\liltlplc ,",Hlldv CondOlllllllUnl c lrlltlalJy Ultimately I. DimCll'ilOnS (in feet) or lJ.rgl'.,r propo\t:d >truCure height; WIdth: j. LineJr feet 01 frontJ~e Jiang J public thoroll~hi,)(c prOlect will occupy iSl ft. -, length 3 ..... . 2, How much Il,~'"ral ":dter"'i (i,e;ck. earth. etc.) wdl I", removo'd rrolll the. 3. 'vVill dlsturbec .::.reas De recl,:llmW DYes DNa ON/,\ a. If yes. fer wh.:lt intend..... purpose is the site beinL: reclaimed? b. Will topsod be stockpded for reclamation' DVes ONo c. Will upper subsod be stockpiled for reclamation' DVes 0''<0 4_ How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs. ground cov~rs) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vpgetation be removed by this project? DVes CNo tons/cubic yards 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated b, Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? (number}. month month DVes year. (including demolition). year. DNa 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DVes 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this proiect 11. \Vill proiect require relocation of any projects or facilitIes? DNa ; after project is complete DVes DNa I f yes. explain 12. Is suriace liquid waste disposal involved? DVes DNa a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial. etc.) and amount b. Name of water body Into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DVes DNa Type 14, Will surrace area of an existing water body increa,e or decrease by proposal? DVes DNa ',' Explain 15. Is prolect or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plilll1? DVes DNa 1(,. Will the project generate solid waste? DVes DNa a. If yes. what is the amount per month tons b. If yes. will "n existing solid waste facility be used? DVes DNa c. I f yes, give name loca i7tm d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into <J sanitary Ia.ndfill? e. If Ves. explain DVes DNo 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste' a. If yes. what is the "nticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes. what is the anticipated site life? DVes DNa tons/month. lB. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DVes years. ONo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more tb.ln Dill' hour fH:r day)' DYes ONn 20. \Nill project produce operating noise ('.'(ceedjfll~ the Inca I illld)lent lIoise levels? OY1:S UNo 21. Will project reslllt in an incre.J~t: in t~fl,'rgy u..d If yes. Indic"te type(s) DVes D~lo 22. If water ':iupplv i" from w..d-" Indlc':Ht' pumping CJpduty gd IlonsirnllllJ te. 23 Total ,1lHICipJtcd wat,'r llsagt' per ddY gJ,J!oll"/day 24. Does prolect involve LUCJI, Stdtc or r('deral fundinl:' If Ves. explain '- DVes ONo 4 .~ ::!s. Approvals Required: . City, Town, Vdloge Boord DYes ONo ( City, Town, Village Planning Board DYes D,'Jo . City. Town Zoning Board DYes DNa City, County Health Department DYes DNa Other Local Agencies DVes DNa Other Regional Agencies DYes DNa State Agencies DYes DNa Federa I Agencies DYes DNo TYP. Submittal Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? DYes DNa If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment Dzoning variance Ospecial use permit Osubdivision Dnew/revision of master plan Oresource management plan Oother 2. What is the zoning c1assitication(slot the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development at the site it developed as permitted by the present zoning? Osite plan 4. What is the proposed zoning 01 the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development oi the site It developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ( 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? DYes D~o 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a v.; mile radius or proposed action? B. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1f. mile? DYes 01\:0 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision at land, how many lots are proposed? a, What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) tor the formation ol''le'Yer or water districts? DYes DNa 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? DYes DNa a. If yes, is existing capacity suificient to handle proi,,'cted demand? DYes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DYes DNa a. If yes, is the existing rood network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes DNa D. Informational Details Attach any additional inform.Hion as lTlay be neeued to cJ.lrify your project. If there Jre or nl;ty be J.ny adverse impacts associJted with your propo<;al, ple<lse discuss such impacts Jnd the rnCJsures which VOl; propose to mitigacc or avoid them. E. Verification ( I certify thilt the inform.ltion providt't! ,lbovl' is trUt~ to tht' best of my knowled!,;c. Applic.lI1t/Spollsor N.lme O.lte Sign.:lturc Title If lhc .lction is in the CoastJ.l/\rc.J, J.nd you ,HC.J ~t.ltC J~ency, completc the COJ.st.J1 Assessmenr Form beiore proceeding wi lh this assessment. ...... 5 ~ :;4 - ... Part 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE " Rcsponsihaity 01 LeJd Agency . . GenerJI InlormJtion (Read (arerul . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations bee~ reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. .~ Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 1) does not mean that it is also np.cessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simpl-- asks that it be looked at further. . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types or impacts and wherever possible the threshold 0' magnitude t.hat would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State anc ror most situations, But, for any speciric project or site other examples andlor lower thresholds may be appropriatE ror a Potential Large Impact response. thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project, on each site. in each locality. will vary. Therefore. the examples are illustrative anc have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list ot impacts and thresholds to answer each question . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. . In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. . , Instructions (Read carerully) a. Answer each. or the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c, If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to Indicate the potential size or the impact, Ir impact threshold equals or exceeds any example prOVided. check column 2, Ii Impact will occur but threshold is lower than example. check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size or the impact then consider the impact as pOtentlallv large and proceed to P.....RT 3, e, If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not pOSSible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO OVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of lS% or greater, (lS root rise per 100 foot or length), or where the general slopes in the project area e,'ceed 10%, . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicleS". . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet or existing ground surface. . Construction that will c~ntinue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Exc<lvation for mining purposes that would remove more th.ll1 1,000 tons of natur;).l material (i,e., rock or soil) per Y(~<Ir. . Construction or expansion or a s.1nit<lry 1.1I1dfill. . Construction in a dcsignated floodway. . Oth~r imp.lets 2. Will there be an effect t~. ...Iy U::.q\le or lJrlUSu.i1/.1nd [WillS tOtlnd on the sitc? (ie., c1ifis. dunes. geolo~icJI forIl1JtiOIl.... l'tc.jUNO L]YES . Specific land forms: -"", 6 1 2 3 ! Small to Potential Can impact Be , I I Moderate Large Mitigated By i Impact Impact Project Change i 0 0 DYes DNa ~. .- 0 0 OVes DNa [1 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 C::2Yes ~ UNo ...... . , . IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed actIOn affect any water body desi~nated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 or the Environmental Conservation law. ECl) DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Developable area of site contains a protected water body. . Dredging more than 100 cubic yards 01 material from ch.,nnel or a protected stream, . Extension or utility distribution facilities thro~gh a protected water body. . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. . Other impacts:' r 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . A 10% increase or decrease in the'surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. . Construction of a body or water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. . Other impacts: ( 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. . Proposed Action requires use of a source or water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. . Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumpmg capacity. . Construction or operation causing any contamination of a witter supply system. . Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. . Liquid effluent will be convey.'.! off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. . Proposed Action wiJllikclv cau.se siltation or other discharge' into an existing body of Wi]t~r to the extCflt that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. . Proposed Action will require the storage of petrolcum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. . Proposed Action will allow residl.'ntial uses in" ilre"aS without water and/or sewer services. . Pro nosed Action loca~es commprrial and/or indllstrialll\cs wlllch m.1y rCflulre new or expansion or eXlstlll~ WiI'>rc trp,ltmpnl dlldiar 'owrage facilities. . Other impacts: l 6 Will proposed action ,dter dr,IH1Jgc ilow or paUt'rns, or '>urface WJter runoif? CNO eYES EXJ.lnpl('$ chat would Jpply to column 2 . Prof1osed Action would change flood water flows. ....... 7 Smal 0 Moderate Impact Q o o c [J o c c o D o o o o ... o o o o o o Q :~ 2 Potential Large Impact o c L.; o o o D o o o o o o o o o o o o o I' 3 .Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DYes DYes DYes QYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes QYes QYes DYes C::;Yes DYes DYes DYes DYe, DYes LJYes !JYt"; DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa " "No DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa nNO DNa DNa . " . . . 'Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing draina:;e patterns. o Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodwav o Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. o Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. . Emission ,rate of total contaminants will exceed Sibs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount or land committed to industrial use. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the density or industrial development within existing industrial areas. . 0 ther im pacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or end"ngered species' DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Reduction of one or more species listed on the New Y ark or Federal list. using the site, over or near site or found on the Site. o Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife h"bitat. . Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. o Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non'endangered species? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would substantially interfere with allY resident or migrd.tory fish, shcllfish or wild lire species. . Pronosed Action requires the rcmoval of more th.}n 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of agel or other loc;dly lnlpurtant vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTunAL LAND neSOUnCES 10 'Will the Proposed Action affect agricullural I.lnd rt";ources' i]NO LJYES (\.lmplc~ that would apply to column 2 . The proposed action would sever, cross ()r limit ,1CCeS'l to J.L:riudturaJ land (includl:'s cropland, h.Jyfields. pasturf.', virlt'yard, orchard, etc.) " 8 sm~. 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [J [J OVes ONo 0 0 OVes DNa [J 0 nYes DNa """ U OVes ONo l...J 0 0 OVes DNa 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 UYes ONo 0 0 OVes DNa """ 0 eVes nNo LJ e [] iiYes ONo ... [] 0 DYes DNa 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo .....1- 0 0 OVes DNa 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo I 0 0 DYes ONo ,"",.. . ," . .. c- . Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. o The proposed action would irreversibly convert mare than 10 acres or agricultural land or, if located in an Agncultutal District. more than 2.5 acres or agricultural land . The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of a~ricultural land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines. outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) o Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action ailect aesthetic resources? DNO DVES (If necessary, use the Visual EAf Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix S.) Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed land uses. or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns. whether man-made or natural. . Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users or aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enloyment of the aesthetic qualities 01 that resource. ( . Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views I:nown to be important to the area. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance! DNO DVES Examples that would applv to column 2 o Proposed I\ction occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any racility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. . Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bcd locatcd within the project site. . Proposed Action will occur in .1n area designated as sensitive for archacological sites on the 1....jYS Site Inv(~n-tory. . Other imp.lcts: c IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. \Vill Proposed Action Jffect the qU<1l1llty or quality of exi..ting or future open spaces or rrcrcatiof1<11 opportunitll's? E.'l;.lmnll.:5 that would Jpply to colulT1ll 2 []NO DYES . The pCrm.1fwnt torrc]osure or J future rI'((cJrional opportunity. . A lll.ljOr rpdllc:ion of an open spJce importJnt to the community. . Othl'r imp.lets: -, 9 1 2 3 Small to' Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change D D DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 n I::JYes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 U DYes DNa 0 D oVes DNa 0 0 DYes, DNa 0 0 DVes DNa .... - 0 0 oVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 oVes DNa 0 0 oVes DNa . D 0 DYes ilNo [J 0 DYes DNa D 0 DVes DNa ~A . .' . IMPACT ON '&SPORTATION 14. \Yill there be an effect to existing transportation systems' uNO eYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration or present patterns of movement or peopfe and/or goods. . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources or fuel or energy supply? LNO LYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use or any form or energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ener~y transmission or supplv system to serve more than 50 sin~le or two famllv residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. . Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise. or vibration as a result oi the Proposed Action? LNO eVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Blasting within 1,500 feet or a hospital, school or other senSitive facility. . Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). . Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. . Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would Jct as a noise Screen. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? DNa DVES Exomplcs that would apply to column 2 . Pronosed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of h.1LJrdous substances (i.e. oil. pesticides. chemicals. rJdiation. etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. . Pro nosed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic. poisonous, highly reactive, radioactIve, irritJtin!~. infectious, etc.) . Storage facilities for one rndliol1 or mort! gallons of liqudieu 1l.1t~r.11 giJ5 or other flammable liquids. . Proposed ,letlon m,lV rl'~ult In the exc.lvJtio/1 ()r Olher di"turhJnCl: withm 2,00U feet of J sltr used tor the dl~pOSJI of solid ur h~I/,l(dou~ wa~te. . Ot!l/.( imp.lcts: ...... 10 Small to Moderate Impact o o o o o ,..., W o o o o o ~... o o o o o '," 2 Potential Large Impact c c c o o c o o o o o o o o r"l o 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DVes UVes DYes Dves DVes UYes DVes DVes OVes DYes DVes DVes DVes DVes CYI~s DYes DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNU DNa . " IMPACT ON GROW'-AND CHARACTER 1 3 . 2 Small 10 POIGntial Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the eXIsting community? Impact Impact Project Change { '- CNO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The permanent popul.:ltion of the city. town or village in which the D D DVes DNo project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. . The municipal budget for cJ.pital expenditures or operating services 0 U DYes DNo will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. . Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. 0 0 DVes DNa . Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. 0 0 DVes DNo . Proposed Action will replace Or eliminate existing facilities, structures 0 CJ DYes DNo or areas of historic importance to the community. . Development will create a demand for additional community services 0 0 DYes DNo (e.g. schools. police and fire. etc.) . Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future proiect~. 0 0 DYes DNo . Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. 0 0 DYes DNo . Other impacts: 0 0 DYes DNo 19 15 there. or is there likely to be. public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? DNO =VES { If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS ResponSibility or lead Agency . Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s} is considered .to be pot~1fttJ.lly large. even if the impac:t(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to' moderate impact by project ch.1nge(s). 3. Based on the information available. decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is impnrt.1nt. To answer the Clucstion of importance. consider: . The probability of the impact occurring . The duration of the impact . Its ir(cvcrsihilitv. including pern1;lncntly lose rl'SOlHCl';-; of villllt~ . Whether the impact can or will he cOlllrolled . The regional con<;p(lucnce of the impc1c.t . Its parentl.1i divf~rJ:encc r rom [OLtI nCl'ds Jnu l:O.1!S . Whether .{nown ohjection., to tlw nrofl'ct reltlte to tlm. imp':let. (Continue Oil .JttJcilfl1en[:;) l " 11 .,. -. '* . ( .- ( l 617.21 Appendix B E:1'Jiron:nental Quality ViSUal EAF Addendum \..\.IJ.l11?871-tJc Ate . Review SEaR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full E.....F. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: . A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use. enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man. made scenic qualities? . An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? . A site or structure listed on the Natiom;1 or State Registers of Historic Places? . State Parks? . The State Forest Preserve? . National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? . National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? . National Park Service lands? . Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? . Any transportation corridor of hiUh exposure. such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? . A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter.county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? . A site. area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? . Municipal park. or designated open space? . County road? . State? . Loca I road? Distance Between Project and Resource (in l"i1es) Q. 'i" [J o r Ii r ~ n r-- W r w LJ l..! o -::",. [J o o c:: o '/4,lh I I o r L r [J I I, ~ o o o o L o 'h.3 3.5 o u -; CJ CJ CJ n o o o o o 5+ n o o n ~ u CJ o o :J [] o o o o n ~ o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 2. Is the visibility of the project :,ciJsonill? (Le.. ~;creem;J by summer foliage. but 'Ji~;ible Juring Qlhcr seasons) DYes O~lo U$cd by the pllblic dur:ng the time of Yl'Jr 3. /\rc any of the' U"SQI;l':I.::S dll~cked \11 quc:,[ion Juring '.vhich the project '.viil be viSIble? rYes eNo ...... ',. ,., DESCRIPTION OF EXI.G VISUAL ENVIRONMENT . 4. From each item checkeCi in question 1. check those which generally descnbe the surrounding environment. . Within *" 1/~ mile *" 1 mile Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River. Lake. Pond Cliffs. Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed o o o o o o o o o o n o o n o o o o o o o o o o o o o o i I 5. Are there visually similar projects within: "/2 mile DVes oNo '1 miies DVes ONo '2 miles DVes oNo '3 miies DVes UNo ~ , Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown. use best estimate. ..~... CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCV Holidays! Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work 0 0 0 0 Involved in recreational activities 0 0 0 0 I Routine travel by residents 0 0 0 0 At a residence 0 0 0 0 j At worksite 0 0 0 0 Other 0 n 0 0 ~ 2 i ~ ...... ..c..a PLANNL'IG BOARD MEM& , RICHARD G. WARD . Chainnan , }EORGE RITCHIE LATH.~'d. JR. BENNETT ORLOWSIa. JR. ~LLUU'dJ.CRE~S KENNETH L. EDWARDS _New _Change of Use _ Re-use _Extension _Revision of ApprOVed Site Plan Name of Business or Site: locadon: Address; Name of Applicant: Address of ApPlicant; Telephone: Owner of land: Agenc or Person responsible for applicadon: Address: Telephone: SiCe pians prepared by: Ucense No.. Address: Telephone: .,-.:",:::;:,:::,:::::==- j'~IlFFal,f" ~ . ':/~\':Jj"%: ~. .:..~ ~.~ v.::2 ~..... "Q . ~etJ =-~ " co v ::.~ . ~:'1 \+. · ~~,i -:{!().t .:fr i-~~./ , ~-~--...---:..- 1 I i I , I \ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Date Received Dace Completed Filing Fee PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPUCATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PlAN , ',lL ? ~ f]zj' ,--=:J~?~~.!?::'~" lhe ~ ~ K... ~'S61JYr" 0 .I.) =cvx.. . ~5 q~ 6sx..~~ 4- I ~W O~ ed . Cu+rk~~I~L{~ ' Kidl(b~ ~1I1L~ '~32-~ ~ t'It.fP.h~ 'N1/ llq~ '53l~ lS-L~ ~ ~('l P-t- -B.i:.vt (] L--cLt'r0lct.4>L ~ 3,-~ ~2V1sd:f V4/lq~ -S~., . ., S'2... '$' '. -~~ ~jJVI...v T. /~ ~ P-e.c.d\-U'G --iCj{o l'i"-~ I ~ ~""" - ,37.0 I FiYf'. ~ 1V\1a~ I \JVI.lllC1S<.. 2.g~ - ~<+LO' ", ._...,~-~- --~ AUG I 2 .~._" . 1 . Pape 2 P"""ll'ino Board Site Plan ApPliCation APPUCANl'$ AFRDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLX ~ \ C ~ p {l ~~ being duly sworn, deposes and says tt1at he resides at ~() ~ :S/.~ ~l1r~ ~ in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above property, or that he is the y~~,u- ofthe_NOYth ~ L \"2e~~ .:TIne... ITitte! (Soeclfy whether Partnershlo or Corp.! which is hereby making application; that there are no eXisting structures or improvements on the land whiCh are not shown on the Site Plan; that the titie to the entire parcel. including all rights-of-way. has been Clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to iots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans SUbmitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in sOict accordance With the plans submitted, 9-- Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer ano Title! swgrre me ~ _ o:b =day of --' I A: 1,19R /}LJ. ~ _ d ,( 0 . /JL~,-,,- (Notary Public) HElENE D. HORNE Notal'( Public, Slale of New York No. 4951364 Qualified in SuHolk en< ".." 0 7 Commission Expires M -" . '. . . ?'Qe 3 ?l"~'''ino Board Site Plan Acoticaoon ~Tocal Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) \ ."1:. Zoning Distrier .. _ . ~ o. _ _ . Existing Use of Site ~ . I Proposed US~ ofSlte.~~_U ~~) ~~ ~ \ 7... <d-I Gross ~r An:a ~ Existing'S~~ - Gross Roor Area of Proposed Structure(sl <::;"1", Percent of Lot Coverage by Buildlng(sJ '0"1 c Percenc of Lot for Parking (where applicableJ ( \ '\..- 2.'1. \Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) J~. Has applicant been granted a variance and/or spedal exception by ---N'b Board of Appeals - Case # & date . "'If) Board of Trustees - Case # & date l\Jn NY State Department of Environmental Conservation . Case # & dace ~ rr) Suffolk County Department Health Services. Case # & dace Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other V\D Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffoik County Board of Health, be stored or handled ac the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of issuing agency Number and date of permit NO ACTION (E(CA VA nON OR CONSTRUCnONJ MA Y BE UNDERTAKEN UNnL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLA TORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECunON. - . " ~g ~. .......,- ."'" ."".... ;~. ~~. ~~' 1..16-1. 'm7)-r~.xt 12 r PAOJEC7 l.u. NUMBER L . . SEQR 617.21 Appendix C Slate Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only --. PART I_PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. ~PPuc r {SPO SQR P.v-t Y1 ~ LL.Q... Countv 4. PRECISE L~0q'~ addr.~ad ;n'L;~ro:ent~~k;:cD ~rov~V-- ~ The 3. /f~ -::tt=- IOCO- 't~ -O~ - 4.1o 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: o New 0 Exaansicn 0 Modiflcatlon/alterati n. 6. OESC~IBE PROJECT 8RIEFL: 'I" CJ\Jl..Cl-.~ . . )/y.. ..\<n.(j ~ ~\S'tl"-f a.S ~y ~~ '9-Th ~~ \ClV\aS kf ClA..t2..(' (l;\.tU.. ~,a,..u:l ue.o---tJL a..... beV-Y'Y\ L (l~ r- ~ 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFF5CTED: 1_ Initially acres Ultimately 1O. 7 - acres S. WILL ?ROPOSE~_~ION COMP,-V WITH :;<ISTlNG ZONING OR OTHER ;;(:I5TING LANa usa ~eSTRIC7iONS? o Ves 5Z"No If No. des~nbe orletly 9. WHAT IS PREseNT I.AfIlE~ IN VIC:NIN OF PROJECT? o ReSidentIal ~"dustnal I:.]..6'mmerclal Describe: Q "\9ric1.llture n ParkJForestlOcen scace DOIll... 10. OOES ACTION INVOLVE A peRMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATE!..Y FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGeNCY {FEDERAL. STAT!..O}l LOCAW? . ~Yes 0 No It yes, list ac;Tenc'/tsl and permiUaocrovals . ~u~.r.o\L ~ b..F db ~ SewCiJ.5 11. ~S ANY ASPc;r-:" OF THE AC110t-l HAve A CURRENTLY VAUO peRMIT OR APPROVAl.? ~Yes ONe It yes, list agenC'/name andpermiUaccroval ~o"S>~ --r-~ ~~ ~ ~O-\c.Lv'-f ~J;- / f'/4 S /:)e..c. 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACilON WILL exiSTING PERMIT1APPROVAl AeOUIRE MOOIFiCATION? D Ve. D No I CEl'lTIFY THAT THE INFORMATlON PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE 8EST CF ."IV KNOWLEDGE AcpllcantlSDonsor name:_~\cJ\(D~ ~~ Date: ~ Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form betore proceeding with this assessment OVEn 1 I I rl \... 1 I ! I I I i , I li , I , I i I ~~-j6.2 (~,07j-:"c . . SEGR :317.21 Aooendix A Slate Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM 1 '- Purpose: The ~uil E,~,F i$ designed whelp aopiicancs unci a~enc;es de~ermine. in In orded'l manner. wne~her 3. .:Jroiec: or dc:ion may =e significant. The Ques-cion or whe~her an ac::on may be 5lgniflc:.nc is ."'lOC J!Wd'lS .~3.SV :0 a.nswer. ~~eque~c. [y, chere are aSDec~s ar J ,:JroJec: :hac are subject:ve or unmeasureabie. It is also wncers~oCc :hac ~hose who ce':ermine significance mav have li(~le ar no formal knowiedge 'Jr ~he envIronment or mav be cechnicallv e:t:cert in environmenc~i analYSIS. In addition. ;T1dnv who have knowledge in one parr.:icuiar area may nOt oe aware or ::-:e broader conc~rn5 aifec::ng the quesClon or Hgnificance. The ,;uJ/ E,J.,F is intendec to provide a method wherebv aaoiicants and agencies C:ln be ~ssured that ~he de~=:riilrnaticn process nas oee!'1 ordedy, comorehensive ~n nature. ye,: de~'obie co allow introduc~!cn or informaCIon ~o he. a prOlec:. or ac:icn. Full EAF Components: The full EAr is comprised or :hree oans: ?3rt 1: Provides obiec~ive data and inrormaoon about a given proiec: and its site. By identIfying basic .orojec: data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and J. P:ut 2: FCCtiieS on iderltifving the range or possibie imoac:s that may occur from a oroiec: or aC":ion. It ;:rcvices gUidance as m wnerher an imoac: is likely co oe conslcered 5mail :0 moderate or whether it is a pcc:!"!t1ally- large imoac:. The form also idennfies wnecher an Imaac: can '::e mltlgaced. or reduced. . P.:ut 3: ~f any imoac: ~n Pare 2 is identiiied JS _:Jacen(iailv~jarge. chen Par:: 3 is used co -?valuace whe!:ner or noe :he :mpac: is ac:uallv impartant. DETER,'vlINATiON OF SIGNIFIC.l,,~CE- Type 1 Jna Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions or EAF completed for this project: Pan: 1 p.J(:: 2 C?art3 L... Uaan ;eview or the iniormation recorded on this =.~r (PJ.n:s 1 and :2 and 3 if aporapriatei. and a.nv other slJ.Ccafi:ing inrormJ.tion, and consider:ng both :he ma~itude and imoon:a.nc~ or e3.c:, imoac:. it is reascnaciv determlnec by :he !ead J~enc'l then: !..-: A. The ;Jfojecr wlil noe ;-esuit in any IClrge and imoortant impac:(sj Jnd, therefore. is one wnic;, wiiI not have a sigmricJnt impac: on ,the environment. thererore J. negative decbr;:ltion wiil be prepared. o 8. Although the project couid have a significant effect: on the environment. there wiil not be a significanc ~ffec: ror this Uniis;::ed Action because the mitigation measures.described in PART 3 nave been ;equirec. therefore a CONDITIONED rlegativc deci.1.r.J.tion wiH be .prc?~red.'" o C. The p(oiec~ may result in one or more !arg'? and importaryt impacts that mav nave a iigniiicanc impac: on the environmenc. thererore a positive dcd':lr<ltion wil1 he prep.J.red. . A Conditioned Negative Dcdaracion is only vaiid for Unlisted Actions ~~c iA.. ~Nr O.a The.. Name or ,..l.,criotl ~ '\~ ~O-Ad Name or L":Jd :\J:'.:nc',l \k~ T:e!e oi Rcsponsloit: OfrlCL'r :\1:f.'r:C'1 :'~e:;JrC'r:.li di{fL're~'H .rom ie5P'msloi~ oriicerJ Sit.;:1Jeure ,:f :~csucnsli)it: 0""" ~;;:+74,!~9L; " .~ -- . PART 1-?ROJECT INFORivA"iON Prepared by Project Spon~ .'h.JT:C::: T:'15 ':::cc:.:me!'1t :5 designed ~a a.ssist in determinin~ '.vnethc:" :~e JC:Cr. ::;rccc~~-:j ;~.J.'1 ,1J'/e a 5i~~tfic3."'c -=ffe'.: on ~he ~nvironmenc. ?[~.;.se e,::maiete .:he entire I;orm, ?:!r~s ..\ :hrough :. Answ~rs :0 :;--;ese ct:e~~lons ',..vlil be c::nsl(::er=::' -J..S oart or .:he JoOiic.::.ccn for Jpcrovai Jna mav be 'iUoie-:::o further \/ertric.:.~;cn .:nJ ;;u=ilc ,-e','leW, ?:-ovlce anYlc:::l;:lcn.; informacion '(ou belie,:;:: will be needed ~o compiete Parts 2 Jnc J. It is exoec:e'.:i chac cor,10ietion or :he ,:uil ~AF wiiI be decencenc on Infor:'7lJ~jcn cure!"'::lV JIJ.ldJ,cie and will not. invciv~ new Hudies. reseue;, or invesclgacion. If informacion reQU!rin~ such Jcc:c:onai '.'tcr~ is UnaVJIIJ.ole. 30 incicate =.nc 50ee;:' aac:, instance. ....."'ME OF ;.C7l0N NOf~ ~ 62 S<fW'fQl...o ::hn c .... \2~,-a C:lYfPO .....""'"ie.CF ;. ':'COAESS I :\\C~~ =~sS~ 1L~~SJES 2. ~ ~ 6G . . ~i 0 ~ ~7Ly'~nl{(; " C...tU"'f ~cw~~ . ,~:t i ",~"l . ! ""'''"~O''=" ~ 'l~~H'~Gsn~~~~ i~#r~t.l~ ~o~~ ~<->- '" p,J-""f i ""~ ~K" D -^--'> V -tb ~ c.tfL- ~. pch. Mi!AJ1~ ?!cJse Complete EJch Question-lndic.Jte N.A. if not .1ppiic.Joic A. Site Description Physical sening or overall proiec:. 1. Presene Land use: CUrban CForesl: 5-":' -- ':"CCRE.sS C:1"Y;PO ooth developed C lnaustriai C.-\gnculture and unde'leloped ;=Commerci.aJ COther areas. ::..:12s1Centiai (jucuro.1n) CRural (non~iar:":'": .... Tatal acreage or proie-::! area: APPROXIMA iE ACRE.\CE Meadow or Brushiand (Non-:lgric:Jitur<11l Forestcd Agricultural (Induces orc:,,Jrds, croplJ,nd. p;lscure. ..:~c.} 'Net/and (Freshwater or ~id<1j JS ;Jer "rtides 24. 25 or Eel.) INarer Surface r\rea L'nveg:~~Jced (Roc:<, eanh or fiill Roads. buildings J,nd ocher p.lved 5UrrJCeS Other (Indic:w~ :':pc! Jcres. 4 ?~EScNTL':' .lces Jcres MTEi< CO."\PL~TiON acres - ac;cs Jcr2S acres <4 ..1c;es <JcrCs ,iGeS .,Ges acres - .lC;'tJ5 Z- ,1C!'es aces ,lC.:res ~~C~~~j ac:"cs J. INh.1c is ;)(edOrnrn.l1"'lt :ioiI;"/;1cbi on :"}roject )de) a. Sod dr;llnJt.:::; ~Ne!1 d:':lned ---l't:1:>-- % or '.Ire cr~or:\' ::ir':':nt'd '~~, il( )I(:C % or ~l~e b :f ]IlV ~~r:cdt'...:rJl !.(~lci :s :rlvoj'lI(~\'I :n.:nv JC{", oi ';;011 Jrp ,.i,~S5Iia"! LJnu C:dS:iiCiC::'::Cfl )r'ite~l1' ~ J.C;L:S. ~5~'_' 1 ,'.i'((;~R. 37il.!. ~e ',:e:;, ~~c~~~(~ ;J,~t~'c~~r~';:,5 on orCDS'~=;~~S ie''')~) .'ilChlll ,cd ~rouc 1 ~hf(H:~r, .: or :~c '\.;y: '.< .:l.' '\'''''r'"'~'lll~t'''' '::t.::r,Qn:,;:,:--.: Or 8r()oosc'~: ;Jrorec: lice '.':l:h ~i(]Qc'\' '.--'---- '. =u.[O~~J % =;5% e::Hcr 'LQ Site. or dis~rJc:. :is~ed on :he ,='iil-1S% ," " '" ," ,r" ~ o. is ,::rOlec: suostJnClai!v ~:Jncl~ljo~ :0. or COn;aIO .1 Regis~ers or :-iis;:cnc ?!.:c~s? '- y~s ~o i. ~ Is ~ro!ec: suos;:unoailv c~nCI~'jCUS:O '1 site iis;:ed 'In :he ,~2~ister or :'lat!on.JI ,'lan...:rJ.J L:.lndmJrk,j? 8. 'Nhat is the de:Jtn or :he water Laale? ~ ~ r:in fe~,=J 9. Is sice joc.a~ed over a prlmarv, pnnc:pal. or :iole SOurc~ aqUifer? '=Yes ~o :uli<.1in~. State or the :'lacionai eYes S><6 iO. Co hunClng. fishing or sherr fishing oppon:unlcies presenc!v exisl: :n the prorec: Jrea? eYes =No 11. Does ,::roiec: sice contain any species or piant or animal !ife~hat is identlried as threatened or endang.r:red? eYes ~o According to [dentdy ~ach spe-:ies 12. A:e there any unrq'ue or DYes ~o unusual land Oescr;;,e forms on the prore-:: sire? (i.e.. cliffs. dunes. ocner geoIO~ICJJ formations) 13, is the project jite o;esendy used by ~he eYes ,~o If yes. e:miain Does t~ present 5i~ induce scenic '/iew$ known ~C be :.....Yes ~o communlry or ,.,ei~nbornood as an open space or ,.ec:-eaClon area? 1~. Imoon:ant co ~he communlcv? 15. Screams WIthin or conclg'jOUS to prOfect area: V'On e.. d. ;~ame or Scream and name or River :0 '.'vnlch ~c is cnbutarv i6. L.lkes. ;lands, wedand areas wiehin or conCiguouS to ;::rOlec: are.3.: a. :-lame y\one. b. Size (In acesj-- 17. !s r \. 0) oj :he site served ~y e.'(istinrs public ucilities? rf Yes. does surricie!'1t c;:J.pac:tv exist to allow is/(es eNo ~onneC:lon? =Ycs eYes '=:'10 CNo " If Yes. wiil imcrovemencs be necessary to iJilow cannec:ion? 13, Is the sice iocated in an a~rrc'.Jitural jistnc: cC!"Clr:cd pursuant Sec:ion 3D] and 304? DYes ~o to Agriculture and .vlarke~ Law. Article 1S-,AA, "Q ", IS. the site ioc.)~e~ in or subs~ntJ<lil~con(iguo~s/to or the ECl, ana b NYCRR 61;? L.Yes ~o a Critical Environmencai Area designated pursuant to An:::cle 8 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wast'"a:s;? eYes ~o 8. Project Description 1. Phy'Sical dimensions and scale of project (fiil in dimensions as oJppropriatel .1. Total contiguous acrcaqe owned or controll(~d by prOfeCt sponsor to.~ ,lc:-es. b. PiOicc:. JcreiJ~e to be- deve!oped: to. z.. acres imri;dly; <.0. <..... JC;-C:; uJtin1~tci'l. c. Projcct ocre,w' :0 remain ulldcl:!opcd '^~cres, d. Length or prorect. in miles: ~ (If Jppropr;ace) C. If the i1rojccc is an ~xnansjOr1. indicae pcr("'!'1c or (''(nanSHlfl ;Jrnposed ~ %, ,'Jumh~,'r or.off-j;:ree~ iJ.Jrkin~ sf)ac!:'s {~~ls~it1,: ~, ;;rODo..ed ~ ;. ,\;laXlnlWn \/(~ilicjlar trrps ;c~wr<1~ed pcr .1011r S (upon ,;':lmplt'!ion or prcicc:l? h. if :C51dcnCIJL .'iumbc:r .]na type ~r hOllSinl: 1111(5: Om. 1~Jmdv Two :'Jrnli',' ,\-lLd!:pJe [',:rnriv CondOflll~~:um l : r~ltli'..jJv liltlmJtc!v iar~e" ;JrCClo",d ;(r"cure ~ he,,''': ~ ,""i,o: ~ k""," Jlom.; J ;::uoli( ~:'Cr(Hlt.:i"lrJrC ;::lrOICc( ,....liI occ~ov is? ~ ft. . ~ ~~i<J~ ~ ]LJ'f-*~ ~CJ.A-f GAJU... Dime!l~u')ns {in ;~~~; ')r !. L:ne.H ice~ of ironCJt;~ ...... Ciaw Oluee ",1[urli '<I,"O'.".'UC", eJr:h. e<c.i ..."il '". rem<1v<.{j .'.,ee ",,,,..#tonS/cuo,e J. Will Jdi~:U:::d,~;e':~,::'~::n~~_e~~rco::~U~he ",:'~:'n" r~;::;~ed,~\a.f.d<rl\ fO b. \^liil :opsoii ~~ s1:ockaded ror i'edumc)tlon; I~es C~o , '.IJres c. \ViiJ upper jubsod be sLOckoded for redJ.rn.J.Clon! 2'fcs ~s{~ W~ How many aCies or veg~'::<l~icn (trees, shrubs. ground cOlJ~rs) .....dl =e eNo romo en "0"- ,'.<:'OJ A a -es ..... v ~ :, ... ~l~<:.:. ~ C. . 5. INil1 any mature rorest (over "i00 years old) or ocher !cc.J.i!v-imporc;J.nt v~-:;et:!tlon =~ "'~~ove-:: oy chis projec:? ~=Y~5 ~o 6. If Single phase project: Ancic:oated period or construe::on ~moncns. (ine!uCing -:cmoiitionl. 7. If muiti.ohased: ;;L a. iotal number or phases anticipated (.1umoerl., nqJ_ b. Anticipated date or commencement ,:Jnase 1 V',6\N moncn ~ \.D c. Approximate comple~ion date or final phase Mn l' )fiZ} \month 2.co \ I d. Is ohas~ 1 func:ionaily de;:Jendent on iUosequent jJhasas? ~o 'lear, '::nduding demoiinon;. '{ear. eYes eNo 3. 'Niil blast:ng occur during construction? 9. DVes 10. ,'iumoer or iobs generated: dunng construc::on :"Jumcer or jobs eliminated bv chiS oroject Y"On e ( 0 ; J.r~'C!" prOlec: is ccrr:cie~= ~ 1-:, \Viil projec: ,equire relocacion or any qrOlec:s or factiioes< ;=Yes ~ [f ves. ~:<oiJ.ln 12. is surface iiquid waste disposal involved? DYes I~ a. ! f yes, indicate t"/pe of wasce (sewage. induscrial. e~c.) ane amounc O. l'lame or water body inco which :ffluenc wlil be tiischa(g~-j 1 J. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involve.J? eVes ~() Type 1~. I,Vil1 'iurrace area or an existing water body inCjea~e or decrease Oy ;:Jroposal? =Yes ?'1o E:'l:r.:iain 1 S. Is proje-:t or any ponion or project locatee :n a 16. \"'1 il I ~he proiect generate solid wasee? eYes 100 ....ear flood ~ .:;)i.:;m? CY~s ~o ,1. I f yes. what is the amount per month - tons o. If yes, will an existing solid Was!e rac:iity be ~sctj? eYes c. r f yes. give name locJtTtm d. 'Niif <1ny wastes not go inca a sewage disposal 5yscem or lOCO a .sanitary rancidl? ,~ '=':es ~ e. If Yes. explain 17. 'NiII the project involve the disposal or solid waste? a. If yes. what is the anticipJccd rate or disposal? b. If yes. whae is the Jncicip..HCd site lire? DYes ~ tonsimorlth. 113. 'Nil I project use herbicides or pesticides? GYes 'f' ~ it rs . ~} .-:'" ~v 19. 'Nilf proic~t routinely prQducc odors (mare th.ln orH' hour rll:r d.JvjJ ;=Ves 20 \Nill projcc: pro<.Juce operatinq nOIse (~,,(C:~2-:iilll~ the ltlt:.1/ <!tlluient lIOlse ie',cls? -.. ;....; , l~~ ~ 21. "Viii ;JrOlcct result in ,111 inc:c,J:)c in !~n,'rg,! u.,d if ,!es . lndicJtc tvpe!s) eYes ~o " :f W,1(O' ;woplv " 'rom .....,"1... ""iic:.", pun",,,," co:;"ut" TOC.11 .1IHic:qJrcd ',".leer L1SU~\~ per (j~.y ---l <<SO ;':J.i!ot\\}eav :';,li!llrlsimll:~;ce. 23. 2.: Docs ;)rOICC: lnvo!\'e LucJ,i, S(.:ce or f'{'de:"JJ fundirll:' If Y~$. l..::'l:OJc11n -.... :='(I~~ ~() J '.. -;.~S. Apprnv.l!S Kt.:quircd: City, Town. V<ii.1l,;': 80.1ro . r (;ty. Town. Vtil.1~~ P~,1nnlng 302ro City, Town ZCrlmg 3c.::.rd C:ty, County HeJith De'::lartme~c Other LocJ.l Agencies ather Regionai .l"g~nc:es StJ.te Agencies Federal Ag~!1cies ~os =>.io eYes ~o eYes ,?<'o eYes =:'<10 eYes C~o eYes :~ eYes ~ eYes ~ Typc 'lA, ~ Submitt;I1 DJte s~").~,,~ IN ,,,lI l~ l<te- -t, \"'C...I(l<>',. ., ~()'('~ C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed aC'::on involve a planning. or zoning decision? If Yes. indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment Ozoning variance Cne'.v/re'lision or master pian Oresource ~ GNo especial use permit Csubcivision. ~ pian CStti...pa.. management pian Cocher \ I~ ~~ Lj:. 2. 'Nhat is che !onjn~ dassifiC3cionislor the Site? 3. \-YhJ.t is the maximum paten ai development or the site of de"eiooed .2. 'Nhat is the proposed zoning or ~he site? s. .c 6. 7. a. 9. 10. i1. JS permit~ed ~Y t~e presenc zoning? a. c.rc. (',~ ".v-r.1 n () ~2.R \Nhc1t is the maximum pocenciai develooment or ~he site if dC'Ielooed as permic'i:ea by :.~e proposed zoning? fs the proposed Jc:ion consistent with ~he recommended uses in adopted !ocai land \.Ise qians? ~ c;--: Woo tt(e~~~(b ~;~~:r;'~h~c~us~r~~c~ f . _~ _ Is the proposed ac:::on camp<lcible 'NICh adjolnln~isurrounding IJ.nd uses within a. 1/;' rruiej . W"'r~s !~;,\,~...: If ~he proposed Jc::ion IS the subdivision of land. haw many lacs Jre proposed? ~ lo~ ltvu~ SI t b:h&Ka. a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? \ Y.;;I... () cJ..-eA I=Yes CSI<';: WiiJ proposed action require Jny authorization(s) for the formation of"'1ewer or water Cistric:s? Will the prooosed action c:eJce.l demand for any community provided fire protection)? DVes ~o d. If yes, is existing cap~city sufficient (0 handle proje'cccd demand? eYes GNo 12. Will the procosr.d action :-esuJt in the generation of traffic sigmric:1ncfy above "resent levels? eYes a. If yes, is the existing ro.1d network adequate to h.:lmllc the additional tT:Lrric? DYes CNo D. Informational Details services (rec:"eacion, educ3.tion. police (P.<(c AH.J.C:' ,lilY adrliuonill inform.Hion a5 ITl.J.Y bt: needed to cJ.lriiy YOllr prolec=. If there lre or moly be Jnv dcverse impacts assoc.:i.:1ted with your propo.;.1!. pJe;lse discuss SUl.:!1 Imp.letS and {he rne.1SUres which 'IOU' propose ~o rn1cisace 0, Jvoid them. E. VcrifiC.:Jtion I certdy that ~Jll: ( '-- ..,ppliC...lf1(/S, Si-~n.,[u(c rf the .lcrion is in the ......ith ~hi'!i J.ss~S'!ime:'lt. ........ ..., ,ht. '''''t Dr en" knowlee,e. O.:te .+\.;;).oLt lq 1.0 'c J ,I,llc J~ency, :':::t:'~~s~2~t~ ::t:omding .~ . -T;;.<;" ...-, r'V;,J~--l 11'I1C--~i.....1 ~ iJi(,~U I r:-~Jn l-.I.....U ili I I ULi'=. . Responsihilitv Ilr It.:Jd ..\~':n. . Gener.JJ Iniorm,:uion (Re.J.o C~ . ,.dly) . In comoie~ing :::e form :he .e',iew'er should ~e g'.liccd bv ~:-:e qWC$;:;on: :-:..ve mv rC~Gon5eS 2.nd dceerrilrnacrons :ee reJ.sonJ;ble~ The reviewer :5 ;1ocexpec:ed :0 be an ~xoer1: i~:1'1I(or:mcnc:d J,nJ.lvst. -. [ce!1orying :hat J,n imoac: '.'1:11 be pocenciailv large (column 2) does noe me::;.n :h.i.t it .S .jiSO .1e-:essardy signiiic.Jnc. ,-\nv Ia.rge imoac: mU:iC ~e e'!J.juaced in PART J to determine slgnd:C.:2r.ce. Ice!1crrvrng an :mcac: in column 2. JIm:::: asks ~hac it be looked ae rur:her. . The E::;J.mples provided are :0 .1ssisr the re'lie'.ver bv ihowint; :voes <Jr impiJ.c::s ,lna wherever .=osslble ~he threshold c magnicude t.hat WOUld c:-i'5ger ~ response in column 2. The ~xJ.mpies olre gene!'J.ilv J.ociicJ.cie throughouc ,-he Sca:e an. rer most sieuations. Sue. fer any specHic pro;ec: or site ocher e:<amcies Jndiof lower :nreshoids may be 3pprooriac. ror a Potencial Large !mpac: resconse. thus requirin~ evaluation in Pare J. . ihe impaC':s or each prolec:. on each site. in ~ach !oCJlit'l. wdl Vary. Tnererore. ~he ~:<J.mcies are iilu5tracive am have been orfered as g'.Jicance. They de not con'Si:lcuce an exhc1us~lve lisc Dr impac:s and :~res;'oics to J,nswer each quesi:ior . The number or examples per' quesi:ion does noe indicate che :mportJ.nce ()r e-ach QUeHIOn, . In identifying impaC':s. consicer fong term, shore term and c:.Jmlacive errec:s. Instructions (Read carefully) a. A.nswer each or the i9 quesrions in PART 2. Answer Yes if ~here ',Viii be anv imp.JC':. b. .\.1avoe answers should ~e considered as Yes answers. c. If Jr,swerin'5 Yes to a question .:t'len check :he JoprCOrlJ.ce box (COlumn 1 or 11 to :r.c:colce ~he pocentIal iize or thE impae:. It impac: :hreshOld eauais or exceeds anv example orovrded. c.~eck coiumn 2. !f ;mo~c: '.viil occ:Jr buc thresnoic is fower chan e:<ampie. c::eck cOlumn i. d. !t reviewer has douce about :iIZe or the imoac: ~hen consll:ie!" ~he rmcJ.c: as pocenclaiiv :dr~e and proce~d co ;:J,..l,.R.T 3 e. If do pocenciaily large imcac: c~ecJ(ed in column 2 can be mlt:l!~iJce~ ::v chJ.n~ets) in the :Jro!ec: :e c1 small to moderate impac:. also check ehe Yes :ox in column 3. A No response indicJ.tes ~h.ac. such J. ,-ecuc::on is not possICJie. Thl5 mus~ be e:<oiained in Pa.rt 3. IMPACT ON LAND '. V'/ill the proposed ac~ion resuit in ,J physic.lI change to the oroje'..;C SIJe! =:--10 ~~ES E;:::.mplcs ~hac would apol'l m column 2 . Any constiuction on slopes or 15% or greater, (i 5 fooe t"ise ~er 100 foot oi length]. or where the genera! slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construc:ion on land where the depth :0 the w<ltcr table is less than J reet. . Construction or paved parking area ror 1.000 or more '1chlcleS"'. . Construction on land where bedrock IS tJxposed or generillly WIthin J feet of e:(iSling ground surface. Construction that will continue ror mom th.an '1c;),r Qr involve more th,Jn one ph~lse or stage. . Exc;J,vJtion ror mining purroses ,hut ,,""Oldd :emovc more th.ln j .000 tons oi nJeurJl material (i.~.. rcd:. or sod) per VP.lr. COnstruclOn or e:<p<1nsion or a 5.1111tary I..ndfill Construc~ion in J designated f!oodw<lY. Other imn.a::s 2 ',ViiI i~.ere h(,.' In ('rfee::: the 'jl(e~ (i...... cliff;. (junes, Soecliic !(,nd iorms: "IY '''':;...1\.il..: Qr lIIlUSU.\l' :.:~~(; :.X1S inllllri en :':~~lo~~cJl ~i.,,)r1!1"':(:OIl'>, l.'tc.lL.,':O C'r'~S 1 Small :0 Ivtocerate Imeac: 2 ;:c(:ntial Lar~e imqo.ct ~ " Can impact '=e Mitigacec Sy Project C:-:ange .~ "-' - " 0 C1 [] I~ ~ n ~ ! ' , ' '-' -; L~ , , ~ L.: L...: ,...., ~ [JY~5 , '~c tl?Yes ONo ~e5 L.: No DYes L..Ji'la DYes n;"-Io rYes 0,'/0 e....es GNo ~ ! 'No LYes f-: y~s DNO " 6 i~':'('s :-: j'JQ .~ -~, IMP. ON WATER 3. ~Viil proccsed J.c::on .lifec: Jny W.:J.ccr body desi~n,l(ed JS ;Jrocecte-:? .,- (Under ,~r:jcjes 15. 2"+, 25 or :he Envlronmencai Conse!''IJci.911 Law, EC:'; \.. _. 0~o =':=5 E;::.1mples ~hac would apPlY .:0 column 2 . Oe'leiocaoie area ar SIC: contains a procec~ed water body. DredgIng :7lore ,:han 100 cuoic yards or material from c~anne! or a procec:ed stream. . extension or (Jcilicv disi:noution racijjcies ~hrough a ,:Jrocec:ed water ~ody . Conscruc:ion in a designated freshwater or tidal wed and. . Other imoac:s: 4. will proCOSea action arfect any non-protec:ed ~:<istini.! ~ew body of wacer? CNo eYES E,~mples thac would appiv to coiumn 2 .. A iO% inc:ease or dec;"ease in the'surface area or any :odv of water or more than a 10 acre incease or decrease. . Conscruc:ion or a body or water that exceeds 10 aCjes or surface are=.. . Other impac:s: ( s. Will ?!'oposed AC~lon a.rTe,:: surrace or grounC:wa~er Quality or :uancity? CNO ::'.Jmpies chat would apoiy co column 2 . Proposed Acion will require a discharg~ permic. ProGosed Ac:ian requires use or a source or water that Goes not have approval to serve !'1roposed Cproiec:) ac::on. CJIf': ~ Proposed Ac:ion requires water supply riOm weils with greater than ~5 gallons per minute pumn'"~ capacity. . C'Jn~truC:lon or ooeration c.1using any contamlnd,tion or .3, '.vater suppiy sYStem. . Proposed Ac:ion will adverselY arrect grounawater. . Liquid effluent will be conve,!~,J off the site to fJcdicies which presendy do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use 'NatC!" in excess at 20.000 gai/ons pe.r day. . Proposed Ac:ion will likclv cause siltation or other discharge. into an existing body or w<1CC:!" to till? extC'nt thCJt there will be an obVIOUS visual conlrast ro natural conditions, Pronosed Action wiil require the 5tor';l/.':~ or pf:troiC\lm or c:hcmlCZll products greater than i .100 gallons. . Prooosed Action wiil allow reslCkntial llSCS in .He"'J.S wIlhout w,lter andlor sewer services. . Proposed Ac:ion loca:es cnmmf'n-:iaJ ,ilH/lor indtlstrral ~,"'i:'S winch m.1V rC1u1re new or~~pCJn5Ion or e~f'HIIt~ Wil\(C ,rr,:crnt->fH ,"Hiier ',lOr<!:;'~ fJcditics. . Other imoac:s: ( '- G ...'\"111 ':)(OClo,s.e..j Jl:JQn <llk:- :;:,110':;;:;0:: ;low C'H :JJ1!{'r!ls./Gr 'N,l(C'~ runorrl ];.(10 E,'t.:.mpIC5 :i"lJt ''vOUIC JClfltV ':0 (oiumn ~ . ::J~cr.o~ed :\cran '.-vould cholngl..;' dooo w,He~ flows. --... ~ur~ac:.: :::) i I 1 ! ~rnail to , i 1oder-are I Impac: i i I I I I I I ~ i , I I I ,..., I - I " I I I I 2 3 . Can lm~ac~ 2e ,vliti~a(eC By P;o!ec~ C~anc;:? P~cen(iaJ !_.3.rge !mpac: - CYes '-.;No - !'Yes j~,~o - i--:Yes i=No '- : Yes nNO - L;Yes LNo , ' ,- :_Yes '=Nc , L i=Yes CNO , ,- :=Yes L~o - - L...! - , r~ - I- I I L U c- '- I i I I i I ! , , , . .,.... ,- i!Yes :-,'JQ I=Ves i_No ", i "(es :=No : ,y~s : ';'\Jo Uy~s LNo ;~'(es i=No '~Yes '=.'10 eYes eNo UYcs '-iNo eVes i !No !~Yt:s !_~'!0 - Y!..'s '_;'10 L r: t. o ~ L- :--: ~ !- I~y~...) C,"'iO / . I 1 eli':"3.tl ~o I lCC2:are j(7';=ac: 2 =::~=ntial , -......0 ~~;~- irr:=ac: 3 Ca.r. lm~ac: Sa i''11iric;atedSy :=rojec: C:ian<;e ~ 'Proposaa ,":"C:10n may C.:luse :5uos~an[lai ~rOSlon. . ?rooosad Ac:ion is incompa(lole with e:'tiSi:lng draln.]::;~ Otl~i:a!'":1S. . P:-o~osad ,..l."c:ion wiil a.llow ce'/eicemen!: in a designated frooc......J.'1 Other imcac:s: IMPACT ON AIR i. 'Niil procosed ac:ion arfeC': air quality? i=NC '\?1:5 E.x.~mpies chat would 3.qoiy to column 1 . Proposed Ac:ion will induce 1,000 or more '/enic:e tnps In any gIven hour. . Prooosed Ac:ion wiil resuit in the inc:neratlOn of more than i ton of refuse ~e!' hour. E:nlssion race or :ot31 contaminants will ~;'(ce~d 5 ibs. oer :;OU( or J. heJI: source prodUCIng more than 10 miilion i3TU'j:Jer hour ?roposed .1c::on '.viii ai/ow an inc:-ease !n the amount or luna commIttee to IncusG.iaJ use. ?mposed 3c~ion wdl allow an inc:-~ase in che dcnslc'l or :r:c:.Jsi:i1J.i de'leioomenc 'NltMin -a:(I5C1ng inqusti"lai areas. Ocher impac:s: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS <3. Wiil?rooosed .,""cion arfect Jnv ;:hreacenec or enC:~"~~'2o:.! spec:es? vG eYES E,:,J,mples chac wouid apply to coiumn 2 ~educ:ion or one or more iPec:es li5~ed on cne ;'\.jeo.v '(ork :lr f:ece~~i iist, tJsing ~he site. over or ne.ar site or round on the slce. . Removal or any ;Jorticn or a critical Of significant wddlife nJoiC.::lt. . Application or pesticide or herbicide more than cwice J '1e.:.r. ocher lh~n ror agricultural purposes. . ather imo~cts: 9. Wilt Proposed Action substanti~Jly affect non-lhre.3.tcflc~r non-endangered species? ' ~O DVES E~amplcs that would aoply to .column 2 . Proposed Action would substano.JJly incerrere with ,H1V :-esidt.::1C 'Cr . migr.Jcor'l hsh. shellfish or wddliic speclcs. f'ronosed t\ction re~uire5 the rcmov.d or more r !l.ln -; () ,1C;CS or .'T\,1cure rarest (over 100 \/ears or agf.'l or other loc:!lv ,mport<1nc vr.~c!~tlon. IMPACT ON AGRICULTUf1AL LAND IlESOUf1CES 10 '.Viil :hc f1;OC05i.:d ..\C:l()n .life'.;: .It;!"1ndlurJi :.lIiC rt'''io~rccsl :'VNO ~YC5 L\.lnlnlc':i ihJt....ouid Jppi'l :0 r.:aiUrT:n 2 ,~:~~ ;lrOOC,)i~:.i JC::OIl WOUI(j -;evcr. .-:;0'55 or liml{ ,1C::~S'i :0 J:..:~:c:it:..;r,,: i,j,nci (inc!U(it.-s copi.1nd. ~'Jvr:c!(lS, ;:lJSWff'. '/Hll"tJrd. (,rC:,,Jrcl. ,~~c.; , I t.~_ ~ '-.: - I I I i I I I i i i j , I ='(:5 :_'(-as :='(~S ~v _ ,~S ~,'l0 :_I'\.jO :=:'l0 I-.,,;,~O C:Yes LI"'4o ;""';Y25 i_No =;'(=5 :_.'10 i.res !~No '_':"~5 i;;-..lo Oras C:"Jo I I I I I I I I I ! I 1 : 'Y~s LY~s LY~s :=Yes iiYas LY'1S i_Y~S ~;-.~O _No :-;,"-lo f::'lo ::NO nNo :~,-...;o -..... 8 .~ . t- c.JnscruC':Jon aC:lvity \Vould e:OCC:lvace or com pac: ,:he :soil prodie or agriculturaj land. . The orooosed Jc:ion wouid Irreversibly convert more :han iO acres or agricuicurai rand or, if located in an As!"Jc'..IitucaJ District. more than 2.5 ac;es or agricuicural land . The ,oroposea action wouid disrupt or ;.:revenc ins~aJlacian or a~ric'.J!cur;].1 land management svstems (e.g.. sucsurface drain lines. outle~ ditches. seilp ciOOPlngi: or c:"e3.ce a ne-ed for 5Ueh measures (e.g. cause 3. farm field to drain paody due to inc~eased runoff) . Other impaC':s: f \... IMPACT ON AESTHET1C RESOURCE:S /" 11. '.Vill ;lrooosed action aifec: aesthetic resources? ~'JO c:y~S (If necessary, use the Visual c:l"F Addencum in Se~:lon 6i7.2"1. Appe~di, S.) E:':.Jmples ~hat wouid aopiv ~o column :2 P:-oposed land lJses, or qroiec: components oovlousiv OIfierent rrom or in iharp contrast to c:.Jrrent surrounding iand us~ pac:erns. whe~her man.made or natural. . P:-oposed [and uses. or ;Jrojec: components Vlsloie to users or a.es~he~jc resources wnich wiil ::!iminate or 5i~nliicantiy reduce {heir enjovmem or the J.esthe~jc cualicies or ~hat resource. PrOleC: compone!"ICs that will Lesuic in the ::!iminacion or 3ignliicJ.nt sc:'cenmg or :ieemc views b10wn to be impOrtllnt to the area. ether impac:s: 1/,iPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. 'NiII P:oposed Action impact Jny site or structure or historic. pre- histortC or paleontological importance? .vr<1'o eVES e..mples that would aoply to column 2 P~oposed Action occ:Jrring wholly or partially within or sucst<lt1ti,aJlv. contiguous co any facility or site listed on the State or NacionaJRcgister or historic pl<1ces. Any imp<lCC to an archaeologicaliite or fossd bcd !oc.Hcd within the projcct site. Proposed ..\cticn will occur in ,.n area designated .JS sensitive for archJ.cologic~J sites on the 1'<iYS Site Inv(;ntorv. Othe!" imp,1Cts: ( '- IMPACT ON CP:N SPACE: AND MECREATION 1 J \~/ill f'mp0'502C ACion Jifcc:: :he GU~./Itlt'l ,Jr qU.Jli('1 cd ,~x.l...{iflg or fllClJrc OOL'!1 sp.lees or ,'~C,~CJ.unl1,li OoptHtunrtll.''5) E:Llnlples :h.H '....ollle ,:tcwl'/ :0 uliumn .;; ,~() C'(~5 The ;lC'~m,Hwnr forC'c!osurc oi J iuC!;rc ,'I'CCJtiOrl,li::;:Jll()((Wll{" \ m.l!or ~1'(iUC:IOf1 ()r an ()r.e~ spJ.C? '1Ilp()r~':/lr :0 ::11: comrnunlc', CChl.'r :mr...:c:s: ., 9 -...---..... 1.1 2 I ~ " _,~all la' ?oten~jaj , Can lmcact 8e I :vlcderate L3.n;e I Mitigated By imqac~ Imcac: I Projec: C;'ange ,- rYes iiNo '- , , - : 'Yes ~ - UNo ,- f:Yes ONo I L; Yes GNo , ]-: Y es CI~O ~Yes eNO I=Yl?S. '-':No - '--:Yes GNo ~ '<.. ,...., " DYes ~ '- ~ L:No n I DYes DNa ~ L: c::: DYes ONo '- f: eYes ! No ~ :~Y2S i_Yes CY2S !=.'Jo ~.~o CNo 'A 1..: vViil . . IMPACT.. TRANSPORTATION tnere oe an ~~r~c::~ eXISi:lng transpor'CJ~:on I . Small:o ...,. ,\lcceraie ..:;, I Imcae: ~:.. ;vsc:=:.-:s! '=.'iO 2 ?otsnrial Larc;e Imcae: , 3 I Can Imcae: :: I Mitigated 3" Prajee: CManc; L.;N. E:::J.moles ~hJC would aoply ~o column 1: . Alteration or present patterns or movement or P:-occsed ;1,c~ion wiil . oeooil:? andier goods. l I )et-. CJ &:1 ACT ON ENERGY 15. 'Niil proposed ac:ion affect ~he communlC'/S sources or ,:~ej 3E energy sueplv? C,,~O '~5 E':::.1mples chat would apply to column 2 . Prooosed ActIon wilJ cause a greater than 5% incre3.se in the use or any form or energy in the municipality. . P:oposed AC:lcn wiil require the creation or extension of an enerq'l tr:lnsmission or supply system to serve more than 50 slnq:ie or two ,~Jmdv residences or co serve J major commercial or iAOustrraJ use. . ather impacts: I I , I m "'''M" " , ~t' =."0 .~ i I I I I ~he :OC,J,1 I i I s.e. ~\Sc- ~l.,_ JV'" V\ , ~~~Ol 16 \Viil there be ooiec'.:ionable odors. noise. or the ?roposed ACi.:ion? . E;:.Jmpies thac wouid appiy m column 2 Blasi.:ing wichin 1.500 feet or a hOSOlt;;Il. 5C:'001 or ocher :ie!15lCl'le racdicy, Odors WIll OCcur routineiy (more than one hour ;Jer d,1Vj. ?:"oposed ,..:..c-::ion wlil oroduce operating noise e:<ce~.jing ambient noise levelS for noise outSide o,r struc::.:res. . P:"oposea Action wlil remove nawraj oarriers :hat would JC: J,S a noise screen. . Other 0.. \ li. Will Proposed Action affect pub He health and sarett! ./- ~o eYES E.~mples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action mJ.Y cause a risk or explosion or release or :'h,,,JrCOuS subs[J.nccs (i.e. oil. pesticides. chemicals. r~diation. etc.) in the evenc or accident or upset conditions. or there may be rl c;,ronic low :~'1el discharge or emission. . P:"onosed I\c,"ion may result in the buriallli "hazardous ',vasccs" in <Jny form (Le. .:oxic. pOisonous. hIghly reJctlve. r.1dic.Jct!ve. lrric.1~inl:. in{c~~ious. \!tc.l 5tor.1~e f,1c.:Jlicies for one rrllifiCrl 1)( rnO(f~ .~.:lilo(JS or UqtJdied il.Hur,ii gJS or :')cner ifarntl1.;ble fiquids. G L rrn(H')')cd .1C:lon r!l.ll! ..esldt in :Ill..' 2':-:clv,J,cioll or Othl" d:sillrh,.ncL.' Wl(~ltn 2.0CU ;e~t oj J 'l;(P. wsed ~'or :r.c (il\pos,J,i oj 50lrd :Jr h~l/,lrdaLJS waste. Ot!~f'r Imo.lCS: ~ '- I _ i .~I I I I i I i i c i i I I I i I I i I i , I I I I I , I I L.: I ,-'Yes I I I I I I , ''I '- ,es · ;Yes C:JYes <;Yes ,=Yes CNc rNc ONe ONe C:NC i~'(e5 eNC : ; Yes I 'No eVes ~,'JG C:Ves LI'Jo ~s ! :No nYes DYes i-Y\:S ~'(l~S :='((~S DNa OI'iQ ~~o Li'll) "' ;0 !......NO .~ L..: ,- f- 18. -"'" '\. IMPACT ON ..ITH AND CHARACT"" OF COMMUNIT( OR NE!GH80RHOOD Will proposed J.c:::on ,lire,: ~he c.nar;;;c:er or lhe ~,'(:st:ng ~mumt'l? . o<io. =YS5 E::amples thilt wouid <lOpiy to column ~ . The ::Jermanenc PDPulcJricn or ~he city. town or 'lIilJ.ge in wnic;, :he projec: is iac:ltcd is like!y to grow ~y more than 5%. . The municipal budge~ for c<loical expenditures or cceracing jarvlces wiil incre3.se by more chan 5% per 'Iear as a result or ~his Qrojecr. . Prooosed ac:ion will conflict with orficiaJly aooated ,:Jlans or goals. . Prooosed ac:ron 'NjjJ cause a change in the density or land use. . Proposed .~ct:on will replace or elimin,Jce existing: faciiities. SCrUC:urcs or areas or histone importance co ehe commumcy. . Oeveiopment wiil create a demand ror additional community 5ervices (e.g. schools. police and fire. etc.) . Proposed Action will set an important precedent far rueure pro;ec:s, . Prot;Josed Action will create or ~!iminate !molovmenc. . Other impac:s: 1 2 ~ " "mall .~ .::8tGnl.ial Can Imcac: Se .u .\t1odera!2 1_3.rge Mitigarec By Impac: ~,"':"lpac: ! Pro ject C:'ange , - OYes Ll'lo r; LYes UNo .- .- L C 1-1 Yes LNo L W GYes ONo C - CYes DNo 0 L....; CYes ONo '"""' '"""' QYes r:No w u G ,- LYes fiNo '- 0 c: Yes CNo '0 '- [s there. or is there likelv :0 oe, puolic controversy ...;a!ara~ .:0 pocennai adverse envlrOnmentllJ :mqac:s? ~O .='(:5 -" 1 '- If Any Action in Part 2 is identified as a Potential Large Impact 0r If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUAT10N OF THE IMPORTANCE OF INlP.t\CTS Responsibiiity or Le~d Agency Part J must be prep.iJ.rcti ii one or more imp.1ct(s) is considered to be pot~'~itr.J.lIy larglJ'. even ii the imp.Jct(s) may b~ mitigated. Instructions Discuss the foilowin!;: for each imp.1c: identified in Column 2 or Part 2~ 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2, Describe (if Jpplic.;JbleJ how che implIct c:ould be mitigated or ..educed Co ;1 smail to mOOI..'rJ,ce imflJc: bv project ch~'nge{s). 3. !3Jsed on the inrormation Jvail.lhle. decide if it is rea50rl~1bjc to c.onc.llJ(je tfhlC this Iftlpac: is impurt.Jnt. To answer the question or importan<.:~. consider: . The probabiiic,! or the :rnpJ.c: occurrint: . The duration of thp. imn.H~t . Its irrC'Icrslhility. Iflc!udilll~ ocrm.lncnc!y fose rl"ourc~", or '1.,lw: 'Nl1cther the imp.lC~ C.:in ()r will IIC cOlllrolled . ihc rcgion.1J con"p(lucnn: or ~he imp.ln Its potential div,:rl:C!'1C~ from lo(;;t1 ne~.d'i .lnc..l ~:o.1is 'Nhe!hcr known nhiecCUlll' ':0 thl' ;"r(}!l''..:: rc!,\{l.' :0 ~~~l'" :rnpdL:. l ~C()nrll1(/l~ on .Jtt~ciltllcm~J " " " ..~ - ~ -,;--- . , " r ..... r \.. / ~ -- i..:.i ..:.; 1 i:!S71_:;'c o t {.L ~ .6.ppendix S e3;:.:te E::'/iro.,:nental QUOle"e'/iew ~j"':_"~_' ~ ^ roo ;'\. ..,... ~ ", l~UGl J::.i-\.:r .L~(la.enaUtil ~-c.u H i i I i ; I i I I ; I I I , , I I , ! This fcr:"':1 may be l..!3eC to provide ~ddi(iona! 'nror:-nuc:cn relating to Q.ues::cr. : 1 of Part 2 or ~he Full ~.':'.F. (To be c=mp!,=~!d by Lead Ac;enc/) Visibiiity DisC<lnce ae~we~n Pro jeet and Resourc, (in ,'I\i1es) Q. '/" 1/4.1/2 1/:.3 3.5 3~ C ,- 0 e !, r-; .-; 0 ,~ 1. Would ~he ;Jrojec! be '1isibie from: A parcel or land which is dedicated to ~nd 3vaiiable to the public for :he :Jse. enjoyment and aopre-::ntion or natural or man-made scenic quaiities? . ,~n overiook or parce! of [and dedicated to pubiic obse!'Vation. enjoyment and aopreciation or natural or IT:J.n-made scenic auaiities? A site or stiuc:ure iisted an the Nationai or. State Registers or Historic Places? '- I I i I I i ! I I I I I i I , I . State P~rks? ~ , , ~ ,/ The State ,=orest Preser'le? l~ationai \ViIdlife Refuges and state game refuges? ,- ito('" :"1ationai i~atural L.Jndmarks and other outsi:znding natural features? 'i/' .-v'" '--' .V" - . t'!aticnal P3rk Service lands! ;-, Rivers designated as tiat:cnal or State Wild. Sce!1ic or Re-:reaticnni? '- ,Any tr;)ns~ortntion c~rrido( of hi0h ~xposure. such as part or ~he InterstiJ.te System, or Amtruk:? ,/ '- . A governmentally estabiished or designated interstate or inter..-.:ounlY root traii. or one formally proposed ror estabiishment or designation? ,- .d r: r: ..,:",- . A site. area, lake. reservoir or highway designated as. scenic? .- .-, w ~ Ii '- '- . l'A.unicipal park; or designated open space? o e" (J o c I I I , : I I I I I I 2. Is the '/isibility of ~he projec ;.cusorl.ll? (Le.. :;creencu by ~llIr.mcr :oliugc. but ':i~:ible rJUI ing ocher r seasons) / ~s SltL "",II ~ ~ 4PC1"~ ~ ~ r:Yes ~r!o vJ\-W\ ~ ~~ ~/s.~",{"..d~ 2. ,Ire ony,i thl" ~""'~~~~JU~F'"s~~c~,,~ during '.'Ihic:, tt~~ orcl~ -....lii ~;c '!/sd;k? -. I ;=Yes ~c ' County road? [} r.;;l'" ,.; o o u LJ . State? u r: n '- Local road? e" '- [J Ii ~ CJ " .~ :- -... , i I I ! j i i i r I ; "-- . DE~CRIPT10NOF .--"STING VISUAL Ei';'IlROi'!!''\ENT . ~. .-;-cm =:=C:1 :cem c<ec In question 1. c:-:e-::-: those whie: _neraily desc::oe the surrounc;ng e:nvironme::t. I i i I i , I I Essenciillly uncievelcped Forested Agric:Jiturai Suburban residentiai Industnal Commercial Urban River. Lake. Pond eliiis. Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly l'A.ountainous Other NOTE: add dct~c~ments as .,e~ded Within " 1/4 miie 'l~ , ~ I~ [J V ~ LJ lV ~ I ' ~ u V ' , '-' ~ I: '- '-' I I r.;;/ ~ n u lid"" I V'" II '--" II II I '- ~ I C r: I ; r: I '-' i , I I I I o. The annual number or '/iewers likely to observe the proposed projec: is NOTE: When user data ;s unavaiiable or unknown. use best estimate. 250 FREG.UENCY Holidaysl Weekends o o o o LJ I~ .,. CONTEXT 7. The situZlcion or acr.ivity in which the '/iewers are engag,ed while viewing ~he proposed action IS Seasonallv o . o o o o o I I i i , I I I I r ~:0's -3 miies ~(es Ul'!O ~ - Distar.c~ from project site are provided rer assismnce. Substitute ache!" distances a; aoorooriate.! ... I i I , ! I I I I 5. i-\re there '/isuaily ~~r ~rojects ~chin: -l/-z mile L'res Wi'!O -1 miies vG;es rl'!o -2 miies UI'!O "' EXPOSURE ...~.-:- . Activity Trove! to u.nd from work Involved in recreational Jctivitics Routine trilve! by residents At J residence At 'Norksite' Other Daily o o o o o o W~y ~ o n ~ lM' lJC'" 11 '-' 2 * PLANNING BOARD MEMBt RICHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS / . . -" --_.~-~ ~-"'.~.~ f>e tZK sue Town Hall, 53095 Main Road' P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 ~ ~ ~~ ; \~~ . ! ~W~ Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPUCATlON FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PlAN ill &~ ~ 10: rn,m I''''''~ i -.---..--j . SOlrrHG~.D Tt'.', ';'i i PU,N~\J(j'\.:{~ 8-," -.;,6 J' -------..- _New _Change of Use _ Re-use _Extension _Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: Location: Address: Name of Applicant: Address of Appiicant: Teiephone: Owner of Land: Agent or Person responsible for appiication; Address: Telephone: Site plans prepared by: License No.: Address: Telephone: _Not,", to(K. ~<roY(QS. I The. ~SCl) CO'f.. Lo..n.e. ct 12~20 Ol-egon ~. c.ut ('~~uel New L\O(~ ~ytf %?Lh(LPt _~ ~2~ ~se-H: N~. \\q~o 5HD- 5~ 1- ISZ5"" ~ l~~ll~L ~ \(k~~' nc.~ -~ ~2.~ ~(\ p~~ N4 \ \'130 ~lo- S.J,'l-is2. c:; ~Ylvy ?Q~YfY' :If.l'f:..h.n~z..3e'(" ~C~lc.. 4Qlo\B I ~ ~O\"'i . _1..._ I, "I U \\.qS,- 2,'D Lt.'C€. \ nr\..Q, ~ IrlU~1 1".7. 2S~- 842-0 . . . Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application APPlJcANrs AFFIDAVIT STAlE OF NEW "VORK COUNTY OF SUFFOlK being dUly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at in the State Of New York, and that he is the owner Of the above property, or that he is the ~~ Of the +h dtrr (TItle) 30 which is hereby making application; that there are no eXisting structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, inclUding all rights-Of-way, has been clearly establiShed and is shown on said Plan; that no part Of the Plan infringes upon any dUly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regUlations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing Of Site Plans and will Comply with same; that the plans sUbmitted, as approved, will not be aitered or changed In any manner Without the approval Of the Planning Board; and that the actual PhYSical improvements will be Installed in strict accordance with the plans sUbmitted. ..,..?-1 JQ (Owner) - , . ~ Signed SflJeL ~ ~ of ~ SW~n to me thlsr \~V~ LX ~Notary Public) 19 -9le. 9.WH MAYO NaIIly PubIc, Slale at.... VIlk ... 4737284 ~"IlIIalc.r qyf Cct.IJ' . 1......,If."'" . ----- ---, Pace 3 Plannlnc Board Site Plan Application . !f):z.. I '""C... Total Land Area Of Site (acres or square Feet) Zoning District ( _ Existing Use Of Site ~ lrl" _ Y\~ Proposed lise Of Site . ross oor Area Of xisti g Structure(s) Gross Floor Area Of Proposed Structure(s) Percent Of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent Of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent Of Lot for LandScaping (where applicabie) I \. , I '50Jn \O"lo l ~ Z."J^ ) Has apPlicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by ND Board Of Appeals - Case # & date l\Jn Board Of Trustees - Case # & date ~g NY State Department Of Environmental Conservation _ Case # & date SUffolk County Department Health Services _ Case # & date Case Number . ~ Name Of APPlicant E.; c.hn Date Of Decision Expiration Date Other "Rtnu.pt ~. -~l=Ott ~~'I.h('. --.no Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the SUffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been Obtained? Name Of issuing agency Number and date Of permit NO ACTION (EXCAVA770N OR CONSTRUCTIONJ MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECU770N. - , ~- ~r ....:,&'. ~v-~> ~ ,..t6-4 f2f8n- Text 12 [ PROJECT 1.0. NUMBER .. I . 617.21 Appendix C Slate Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) ,. APP AN, I PONSOR WROJ SEaR Municipality County 4. e:SEqSTION (~ddr~~lerse:n., P\~~~mark~~~ map~ tt:.Q,o --r~ \V\o-p4t \D00 - 83- D3 - 4.lo 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: o New 0 Expansion ~Odlflcation/alteratlon 5. D~BRI~~~C~/~~~=O~~~09~~~ ~~ \?e-VrY' Lo.~ ~ ~)CJf~;;;~ .2. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? 0' Ves [J No If No. describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAN[)}lSE IN VICINITY ~PROJECT? o Residenllal U1Industrial ~ Commercial Describe: o Agriculture ~arklForest/Open space DOllie< 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STAT~9R LOCAL)? . 'ol ~ tttud n h~ g Yes 0 No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/appro7's ~ <: t+-_ ~)' - . -;- .,..,--: /' , ~ 0. reC1-\~ ~~ \.-T N. i. ~ :I?e.~. c ~ 'TU IS~or.- 11. il~S ANY ASPECT OP THE ACTIOr< HAVE A CURRENTLY VAwn PERMIT OR APPROVAL? IS!!" Yes 0 No If yef:, list agenoy name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? DYe. oNo I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: slgn~tu'e: ~ Dale~ If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you S9i~ age cy: complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 .- PART II-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES NT (To be completed -by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEeD ANY TYPE I THR SHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.121 If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. Dve. DNo B. WilL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNUSTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No. a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. DVe. 0 No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSe EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOllOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, jf legtble) C1. existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levelS. existing traffic patterns, solid waste prOduction or disposal. potential for erosion. drainage or flooding problems? explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological. historic. or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish. shellfish or wildlife species, Significant habitats. or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: 04. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted. or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? explain briefly C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Lotlg term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not Identifled in C1.cs? Explain briefly. C7. Other Impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE UKELV TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? DYes 0 No If Yes, explain briefly PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNII':ICANCE (To be completed by Agency) .INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it Is substantial,large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (I.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (e) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. o o Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or Significant adverse impacts which MAY occut. :r-hen proceed directly to the FULL EAF andlor prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOr result in any. significant adverse environmental Impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the'reasons supporting this determination: Name at Lead Agency . Print or Type Name or ResponSible Officer: i~ l~~d Agency' . , ," . " .,"" '1'~_,'" Signature of RMpon'S1tile O;fr~~I in lea~^PnCY . Title of ResponSible Officer Signature at Preparer (If different flom responsible officer) Date 2 .-....- l . , ~ 4-16-2 (1/tli) -7 c SEQR . . 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULLEN~RONMENTALASSESSMENTFORM {" Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderlv manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question or whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent. Iy, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in envi.ronmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware or the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehenSive in nature. yet flexible to allow introduction or information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The iull EAF is comprISed of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifYing the range of possible impacts that may occur irom a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be conSidered small to moderate or whether It is a potentially- large impact. The rorm also identITies whether an Impact can be mItigated or reduced. . Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE- Type 1 and Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 Unlisted Actions o Part 2 OPart 3 c Upon review oi the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate). and any other su.pporting information, and considering both the magi tude and importance of each impact. it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: o A. The proiect will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a negative decl.1ration will be prepared. o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measure,,-described in PART 3 have been required, . therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' . o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. . A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions NC){~ l1YfL -ee..So0YCJl.<& ~c Name or Action '500+\-1 D\d Bcoxo\ T~ Name of Lead AI:ency e ~Jr.a.rd . Thn~ ./ 'J{-. Print or Type Name or Respol1slble 0 ficer!ll lead t\gcncy Jyt"'<:;'IOF'_Y\.+ Title 01 Responsible Officer Signature or Rcsponsl!JI(: OfficL'( In L(~.ld Al:l'lIC\' Sign.Lture oi [lreparer (I f different from responsible orflcer) ,-.- JUne ~qlp Date :~ ~ ,. .. . PART 1-PROJECT INFOR.ION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a si~nificant efTec on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts 1\ through E. Answers to these questions will be considere' -as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona inFormation you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involv, new studies. research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unav.1ilable. so indicate and specih each instance. \\9~ BUS NESS TELEPHONE rSlfd 1-"1S 2 'S"'"" CITY/FaO ' Bov irlo.e Y\o..~-l- c'("\ NAM1:: OF OW~~fferent' I STAT~I , N ., I ZIP CODE . \\Q3Zo 3USINESS TELEPHONE J ADDRESS CITY/PO 1 STATE I ZIP CODE DEs~;F~l ~ O~ ~CSY- ::: 4 o..u-es. C> . . . ~h. "lP-h .-!by ~~ ~ Q..lKg,~ I ~ ~l"')-hN>, L.V IDl\e.. I ~ --fufur-e. \ev-c:l S<.JyAt.C-A.. -tt. ~ - Of' V-oY"l ~ 5-v:x..-- ,.. ~ ~ -- C'(US\-Q.......). $~~y -10 ~CJ...\.c...lL off- cJ . Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project. bot'}developed and undeveloped 1. Present land use: DUrban C!'lndustrial OCommercial DForest DAgriculture DOther (p.2 areas. C~!,sidential (suburban) ORural (non-farm 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENtlY Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) '-\ Jcres Forested acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture. etc.) Jcres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECI.J "cres Water SurFace Area '+ "cres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 7- ,lcres Other (Indicate type) ,leres 3_ What is predominant soil tvnds) on !1roject site? ~ U ri U \DC).....Y"Y"" a. Soil draina.L:c: ~Vell drained ~ % nf<;,ite CMoJerate!v well dr.:1ined Oreorly drJlnt'd % (If Slt/: b. If any agflculturall,lIld is invOlv~o\V In,,"y JU"S of ""I a. re cl.lssJfil'd \vtthin ~od group 1 land Classification System' acreS (See 1 NYCRR 3701. 4. Arc there bedrock outcroppings on project site? DYes ~o ~. What is depth to bedrock I I Ql"()' (in fe"t) AFTER CO,vtPlETION acres acres acres Jcres acres acres acres acres '% or site throtH;h .. or the NY5 2 .,. J. Approximate percent~l~e or preeJ project '>lte with slope,,;: ~ 00'. LO--l 10 015 % or greater % z..o D-lO~lSg'o % 0' '0 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or co~ain .] builcJing, site, or district, listed on the State Registers of Historic PI~ces? DYes 000 ( 7.-ls project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register or National Natural Landmarks? '8, What is the depth of the water table? 35 (in feet) or the National DYes DNo 9, 10, Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes ~o 00 hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes ~o 11, Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes cvro According to Identify each species 12, Are there any DYes uniquJ or unusual land ~o Describe forms on the project site? (Le.. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) 13, Is the project site 9resently used by the community or neighborhood as an open DYes 000 If yes. explain space or recreation area? 14, Does the present si;.e include scenic views known to be important to DYes [)I'No Streams within or contiguous to project area: ron e. a. l'\lame or Stream and name or River to which it is tributary the communityl 15, 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a, Name V\O"'Ie. b. Size (In acres) 17. ( Is the site served by existing public utilities? r:lfes DNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? DYes DYes ONo DNo ~ 18, Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursll~nt to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? DYes ~o 19. Is the Site located in or substantially contiguous,;o a Critical Environmental Area dcsignated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6171 DYes l'!il"No 20, Has the site ever been used for the disposal of sol id or hazardous w"sms? DYes DNo B. Project Description 1, Physic~1 dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a, Total contiguous acrea.qe owned or controllt!d by protect sponsor b. Project. acreage to be developed: {O.. 2... acres initi.-dly; c. Project acreage to remc1in undeveloped ~ acres. d. Length of project, in m.iles: --*-- (If .1ppropriate) C. If the project is an expansion, indicJtc pcrn'nt or l'x[1ansiol1 proposed ~ %; f. Number of off.street parking spaces existinJ: 7..$:) ; propn'eu ~S g. MaXImum vehicular trIps gCflt'rZlted per hour 5" (upon completion or projectl? h. If rCSldentiaL Numb(!r and type of housing llllits: On(' ramily Two t-amd',' (P.l &,.'2.. ,1cres. acres ultimately. IV\ldtlple 1",1Inlll,' Condolllllllurn l InctiaJly Ulllm~tcly I. Dimell"ons (in reet) or lar~e't propm"d structure --$- hClght. ~ 1V"lrh: Nj A Icnqth ~J~ LInear feet or rrontJ~c along J publiC thoroughfare proJcct wtll occupy IS} ....i... ~ ft 3~C>~~ , -Yr--4e.VL~ ~~ ~~ ~ .- 2. How much natural Irhlteri~ll._, ruck, e41rth, etc.) will !H~ removf'cJ iro.e site? 3. \Vill disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~es DNa ON/,\ a. If yes, for what intend..__ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation' ~es DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation! i3'1es 2..0 (;J::XJ yards DNo 4 acres. 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground cov~rs) will be removed from site? 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vpgetatlon be rpmoved by this project! DYes GjIIo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of constructron ~ months. (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: . a. Total number of phases anticipated 2.. (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 .~ month c. Approximate completion date of final phase N\" .. '2co1 month . , d_ Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? DYes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes 000 9. ,'lumber of jobs generated: during construction (.D \QGL., 2.l:!O I year. (including demolition). year. DNo ; after project is complete l4> 10. :-.lumber of jobs eliminated by this proiect f'c.V\.A..... 11. '.Vill project require relocation or any projects or facilitIes? DYes 51'fo [f yes. explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved! DYes ~o a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial. etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved! DYes liNo Type 14. "Viii surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? DVes [jX'() E:~piain 15. [s project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plall1' DYes ~o 1(,. Will the project generate solid waste! DYes 1QI<70 a. If yes. what is the amount per month - tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes ~o c. If yes, give name locJtTbn d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary [andril[' DYes ~) e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste' a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? DYes 5l1<1'0 tons/mol\th. 13. 'Nill project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes yt:ars. ~) 19. 'Nill proJect routinely pra"ducc odors (more lh.1n Orlt' hour pt:r day)1 DVes ~t) 20. \Vill project produce operatjn~: noise ('xceeuifl/: the 21. 'Nill prolect result in an incre.;~t.: in I~fl.'rgy u...d [f yes. indicate type(s) If woter \upply i, from w,.lh. lI,dre",,' pump'llg calJ.II.rty ~ g,i1[ullsimll'"te. Total ,111t1cipated water usage per day \~ galloll"/uav local illllbient noise DVes ~(J levels? Oy(~S 5>11'0 22. 23. 24 Does prorect involve Local, St,lte or r('deral fundilll;' If Yes, explain ....... DYes ~() 4 .,. C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning. or zoning decision? If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment Dzoning variance Onew/revision of master plan Ore"source 2S. ApprnvJ.ls Required: ~ r City, Town, Vdl.1ge Bo.1rd ~ty, Town, Village Planning Goard . City. Town Zoning Board ~Y. County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies 0'tate Agencies DtG Federal Agencies ~es DNa DYes ..t.~ 0 DYes ~"Jo DYes ~o DYes I3"No DYes gNo DYes 19No DYes 000 .yoe "T ~ eooJ.-.ei Submittal Date S-l-Qlo s-fes DNo Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision management plan ~her V'JrJ-Uvc>r L:L. . L.II\.d.os-tvlaJ ISMite plan ' ov- Q...t'A.au.I.nJ 'S~ 2. What is the zoning c1assification(sJof the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of _(,,_ t..~Q. ['.xes the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 5. \Yhat is the maximum c~ 0 YC.J..O-.Q I ()~ J potential development oi the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning oi the site? ( 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 51'1"'"es D~o What are the predominant land users) and zoning classifications within a V. mile radius oi proposed actio~_-AI n ~\ LX ~\daJ Ir~'G1 Uclt\/\t\e, I.SY\~ ~1~ICL Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~~ mile? (9"(es C~o If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? -=tJaIs MI~ ~..'~ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? \ Y1- Q (-\-e-::. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of"''Se\oYer or water districts? DYes QNc Will the proposed action create i" demand for any community provided fire protection)? DYes ~o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle proje"crcd demand? DYes ~ 12. Will the proposed action result in the gener"tion oi traffic significantly above present levels? DYes ~ a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional tr"fiie? DYes DNo services (recreation, education, police, D. Informational Details ,\ttach any additional inform.Hion as may b(~ neeued to cl.lnfy your proJect. If there Jrc or OlilY be any adverse impacts associated with your propo.;,]I, please discuss such imp,lets and the rnCJsures which you' propose to rnicigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the ( AnPliC.lllti~\SOr Nfme Stgn.1turc - ., If the ,Iction is in thl! C with lhis assessment. ....... to ttH' hest of my knowled.~L'. ~ (f)...J J ~I.lt~ a~ency, complete the (o.J,sIJI Assessment Form hefore proceeding Title 5 . ,. Part 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE . Responsihility of lCJd A~cnc. . General Informalion (Read Carefully) . . In completing the form the reviewer should be gujded by the question: H;1ve mv responses and determinations beer reasonJ.ble~ The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. .~ Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean th~1t it is also n~ce5sarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. IdentIfying an impact in column 2 simpl'. asks that it be looked at further. . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types or impacts and wherever possible the threshold 0:- magnitude t.hat would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicJ.ble throughout the State anc for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriatE for a Potential Large Impact response. thus requirin~ evaluation in Part J. . The impacts of each project. on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative anc have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhc1ustive list' ot impacts and thresholds to answer each question . The number or examples per question does not indicate the importance or each question. . In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each, of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impc1ct. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to Indicate the potential size or the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided. check column 2. It Impact will occur but threshole is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about Size of the impact then consider the impact as potentlallv large and proceed to PART J. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 Can be mJtI~ated by chan~e(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact. also check the Yes box in column 3, A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possIble. This must be explained in Part J. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? DNO I2"YES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than J feet. . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicleS"". . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or genNaJly within J feet of existing ground surface. . Construction that will c~ntinue for morc than 1 year or involve more than one philse or stage. . Excavation for mining purposes that ~\I()lIJd remove more th.lll 1,000 tons of natural material (i.c.. rock or soil) per Y(~;lr. . Construction or expansion or a sanitary l.lfldfill . Con'5truction in a designated floodway. . Other imf1.1cts 2 \;Villtherc be an ("ricet t: ."IY Ui;.que or llIlUSu.1l I,lnri frHIj)S fOIl/HI on the site? (i.L'_. cliffs, dunes, geologlcJI forIl1JtiOIl.... etc.JL~O LJYES . Specific 1.1nd ferm'5: -..... 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change , I i ~ 0 DYes O,~o ro. .' 0 0 &1es ONo C1 0 ~s oNo 0 0 DYes DNa ~ 0 DYes DNa 0' 0 DYes ONo 0 0 I'Yes ONo 0 0 DYes ONe 0 0 eYes ONo r, [] eYes ~ UI'JO ...... . IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? .r (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservatl?n Law, ECL) \.. _ ~O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Developable area of site contains a protected water body. . Oredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream, . Extension of utility distnbution facilities through a protected water body. . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. . Other impacts:' 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing 9r new body of water? ~O DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . A 10% increase or decrease in the'suriace area of any body or water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. . Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres or surface area. . Other impacts: ( 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? DNa Q>(ES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. . Proposed Action requires use of a source or water that does not have approval to serve proposed (projectl action. . Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capaclty. . Construction or operation causing any contamination ot a water supply system, . Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. . Liquid effluent will be convey"J off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day, . Proposed Action willlikelv cause siltation or other discharge"into an existing body of wnter to th~ exwl1t t~at there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. . Proposed Action will require the storJl.:C of petrolculIl or chcmiC<11 products greater than 1,100 gallons. . Proposed Action will allow residential llses in' are'as without w.lter and/or sewer services. . Proposed Action loca:es comm(~r(ial and/or indll'itriillll'iCS wlllch may rCflUlre new or "'!:<pansion of e:<l:itlll~ WiJ'ite trp,Llmpnl ,Illdiar "wrage facllitics. . Othcr impacts: l 6 Will proPo,s.ed Jctlon .tlter dr,ltnJ.~c flow or pat!(,rnsj or water runorr? ~O E:t.1rnpl('s that would Jpply to column 2 . Prof"'osed AUlon would change flood water flows. ....... "urfacc eYES 7 " 1 Small to Moderate Impact o o o o o o o o o o LJ CJ o o 4. o o o o o o o 2 Potential Large Impact o D o n o o D o o o o o o o o o o o o o n ::t*l 3 . Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DYes DYes DVes eVes OVes DVes DYes eVes DVes DYes DVes OVes DVes '~Yes DVes OVes DVes OVes DYes t IVl'S DYes ONo ONo ONo ONo ONo ONo DNa DNa DNa ONo .. INo UNo ONo ONo DNo DNa ONO DNa nNO DNa DNa . . 'Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. . Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodwav. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO ~ES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. . Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. . Emission rate or total contaminants will exceed Sibs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount or land committed to industrial use. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within eXistin~5trlal areas. a.r.:h . Other impacts: ?"D~ \~ (lYl (p lrs..e- ~ IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or end,.,ng'J"d species? ~O eYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Reduction or one or more species fisted on the New York or Federal list. using the site. over or near site or found on the site. . Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. . Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other than for agricultural purposes. . Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatcne}i or non-endangered species? ~O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would substantially interfere with allY resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife speclcs. . Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 y'ears of age) or other loc:J/ly Impurtant vegetiltion. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed I\ction affect a~ri(tlJtural I.lnd r{";oJlrccs~ [\?NO DYES r.'\,lmplcs that would apply to column 2 . The proposed actJOfl would sever, cross (lr limit ,1cces~ to Jgrrcultur;ll land (includL'S cropland. hJytielcJs. pastLJ(f~. vint.yard. orchard. etc.) ....... 8 1 2 3 mall to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [J 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo ,..., U DYes DNa '--' o o o o o o o o " LJ o o o o o ........ o o o [] o o o o o o n ~ o .':J4 DYes DYes DYes DYes eYes gYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNa DNa nNo DNa DNa DNa ONo ONo DNa oNo DNa . c- . Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile or agricultural land. . The proposed action would irreversibly convert mOre than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District. more than 2.5 acres or agricultural land . The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines. outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g:. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES / 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~NO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 61721, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns. whether man-made or natural. . Proposed land uses. or project components visible to users or aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enloyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ( . Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views I;nown to be important to the area. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of pistoric, pre- historic or paleontological importance? u;f<o DYES Ex,mples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed I\ction occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic pl,ces. . Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed lociJted within the project site. . Proposed Action will occur in an iJrea designated <1S sensltlve for arch.1cologicaJ sites on the 1'.,jYS Site Inventory. . Other impacts: c IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 \Vi/l PrQPosed Action Jffcct the quantity or quality of exi.,ting or future open splices or rccrcJtlonal opportunities} E.t,lmpll'S that \\.ouJd Jpply to columll l. ~o eYES The pcrm.1rwnt torpc!osure of J lllturc rt'crcJtlon.l1 opportUlllty . A 1ll,1rOr rt'duction of an open spJce ilJlportJ/lt to the community . Other imp.lcts: ....... 9 ",!"",- --.~.--....,..... .'-.,--- -. 2 3 Small to' Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 n DYes ONo 0 [J DYes ONo 0 U DYes ONo 0 e DYes ONo 0 0 DYes.. ONo r: 0 nYes ONo ~ .... - 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 eYes ONo 0 ,-, DYes ONo L.; r: C DYes ONo ~ r: C DYes DNo '-' ,..... IMPACT OAANSPORTATJON 14, Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? CNO ~S Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration or present patterns or movement or people and/or goods. . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. . Other impacts: MN;Pd ~c:t ()li>. . ~ \..4t\ ~Jt.-. ' U IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? Ci':O CYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use or any form of energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension or an ener~y transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 sin~le or two ramdv residences or to serve a major commercial or industrraJ use. _tJ. _ . Other impacts: vvVJ ~ ~ \ NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a reJult of the Proposed Action? . CNO gyES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school or other senSItive facility. . Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). . Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeJing the local ambient noise levels for noise outside or structures. . Proposed Action will remove natural ba.rriers that would Jct as d noise screen. <>c.- o.. ()..AJLl' MPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safetyl arl'o DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Pronosed I\ction may cause a risk of explosion or release of hJLardous substances (i.e. oil. pesticides. chemicals. r.1diation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. . Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hJ/Jrdous wastes" in any form (Le. toxic, poisonous. highly reactive, radioactIve, jrritJtinf~, infectious. etc.) . Storage f.lcdities for onc million or mon! gallofls or liqlllfieu fl.1tur,ll gas or other flammable liquids. . Proposed .1ctian 1ll.1V result in the e.'<c,lvJtioJl or atllt.'f distufh,Jncl~ witlun 2,000 feet of J SI[f.' used tor the dl'lnOsJI of solid Of h':lI,lrdous waste. . Otlwr imp;lcts: ...... 10 1 Small to Moderate Imoact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change 0 ' , DYes ONo c- D - DYes DNa IV ~ DYes DNa o n .~ ~ U o r, : I o ff .~~ o o o o o '," - o c c DYes DNa DYes DNa DYes DNa 0 DYes DNa 0 DYes DNa 0 DYes DNa 0 DYes CNo 0 8'fes DNa o DYes DNa 0 DYes DNa 0 DYes DNa [] DYes ONO 0 DYes DNa ~. . . IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Will proposed action affect the character of the eXlsti':1gj=ommunitv? ~O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . 18. C- . The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. . The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a r.esult or this project. o Proposed action will conilict with officially adopted plans or goals. o Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. . Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas or historic importance to the community. o Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools. police and fire. etc.) . Proposed Action will set an important precedent ror ruture proiect~. . Proposed Action will create or eliminate emplovment. . Other impacts: -- ~ ,...... .-? ..':""i 1,.- ,..iItr. 1 2 3 Small 10 PolGntial Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact PrOject Change: 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 19 Is there. or is there likely to be, public controv,:,::/ related to potential adverse environmental impacts? LYr'lO =YES ( II Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact vr II You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of lead Agency . Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be pot~~it;'J.lIy large, even jf the impact{s) mC)y be mitigaled. lnstructions Discuss the following ror each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if Jpplicable) how the impJct could be ""tigated or reduced to 01 small to moderJ!e impJct by project chJnge(sl. 3. Based on the information availahle, decide if it is reasonable to conclude tlhlt this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: . The probability of the impact OCCurring . The duration of the imnact . Its irreversihility, incJuc.fitl,~ permanently lost ({....ourel...; uf V<lllH~ . Whether the impact CJn or will he cOl1!rolletl . Tbe regional con<;('<1ucnc:t~ of t11l~ impart . Its potential djv(~n~cnce from [oc.11 nl'l'ds Jnu 1:0,115 . Whether known objection... to till' nrojt'ct reicHL' to till'" IInp.1u. {ContInue on ..lttacflmcncsl l -.... 11 .'" -. < > ,- . ( '. ( l "'- ,-\-, 617.21 . Appendix B . ~~~te En'Jiron:nental QualitY"'Review Visual EAF Addendum 14.1.1.1 \ (~.3i)-9c SEaR This form may De used to provide additional informotion relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full E..>..F. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: . A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man. made scenic qualities? . An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation. enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? . A site or structure listed on the Nationai or State Registers of Historic Places? . State Parks? . The State rorest Preserve? . National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? . National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? . National Park Service lands? . Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? . Any transportation corridor of hi!Jh exposure. such as part of the Interstate System. or Amtrak? . A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter.county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? . A site, area. lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? . Municipal park, or designated open space? . County road? . State? . Local road? Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) 0.'/, '/4.'/2 '/2.3 3.5 5+ o 0 0 0 P' o l' o ,. o o o L1 L1 D ~~ '. o D o o ~ D n ~ o [J n D D D D D D D c:J D o D o o :J o ~ :-.J o 1......1 [Y' ~ , , ~ o !?' ~ B" w.-- ~ LV ~ CG./ ~ [Jl./ C o D 2. Is the visibility of the project :.l.:uson,d? (i.e.. :;creeneu by summer foliage. but vi~;ible,,(uring other seasons) -'(\M.<:> $\..k:L W\ \\ 'Q.(. ~'1 ~CU/\.Jl..d ~ ~. . DYes &~Io ""'~ ~~ l~Sc.o pe.O bel""" " ~ 0...- ,~"f ~ "",*", LhcU.~. 3. /\rc any of thr ~P'$OI;!':'-':S t.:rwcked III quc~,ll()n I lJ::icd by tht.:: ptJDllC dunng the tll1H: of yt'Jr during '.vhich the P~cy1-:[ .....iil be 'risil)le? CJYes ~No o o o ...... .... - u -; o D o o o D [3' l? o o o o [J . " i I , ~ ..- .. . -~ . Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed Within 'l~e ~ o o o o o !iY o [g'" o o o o * 1/~ mile o o 13' [jJ- Q" 1M ~ o g- O I'G" o o n 5. Are there visually similar projects within: "Iz mile ~Yes oNo 'I miles ~es oNo '2 miles I:ii'i es 0 No '3 miles Q4es oNo .,. , Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. '~... . ?So CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is Activity Travel to and from work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At worksite Other Daily o o o o o o WQtIY o o [3 ~ o FREQUENCY Holidays/ Weekends o o o o o o Seasonally o q Ii:Y o o o ~ 2 ...... ". -- e Sj13Fs (9) rBS/rt/fC hrt SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMiTTEE August 3, 2004 re: ~ The ARC met at the Town Hall Annex at 4:00 p.m. Members ~~ ~r~ ~ Vi ~ Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman I W)- . Nicholas J. Plananento. ,.50"",01d ~, c _ 5 1004 D Ronald McGreevy, Mattituck . U' AU" Howard Meinke, Cutchogue Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary ~1~~~~;d J~:r~ Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, Peter Harbes for David Rose Perennials, Henry and Jenny Bremer for North Fork Deli, Pat Moore, Michael and Monica Raynor for Matt-A-Mar Marina and Ronnie Hill for Cutchogue Business Center. Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Howard Meinke it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of May 27, 2004. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. DAVID ROSE PERENNIALS (5645 Aldrich Avenue - Mattituck) it was RESOLVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Ron McGreevey to APPROVE the APPLICATION as submitted to add offices inside an existing agricultural building with the understanding that further reviews will be required if the plans are revised. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. ( / I NORTH FORK DELI (11155 Main Road - Mattituck) The APPLICATION was TABLED awaiting details including colors, lighting, signage and resolution of the inconsistency in the roof lines between elevations. MATT-A-MAR MARINA (2255 Wickham Avenue - Mattituck) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Howard Meinke to APPROVE the APPLICATION for a 28,000 sq. ft. addition to the boat storage barn and an attached 3300 sq. ft. office building SUBJECT to a review of the siding and roof materials for the office. The Committee favors colors and materials that match the storage barn. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. CUTCHOGUE BUSINESS CENTER (8595A Cox Lane - Cutchogue) e " After a presentation of the internal changes to this 12,000 sq. ft. storage building, the Committee TABLED the APPLICATION awaiting the signage, the lighting"of the sign and the exterior of the building, and the identification of the roof vents. OSPREY DOMINION WINERY (Main Road - Peconic) The Committee continued to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting the exterior color of the drivit, colors and material of the conservatory other than glass and the location of the roof penetrations. BILL FOX GROUNDS MAINTENANCE (2595 Peconic Lane - Peconic) 1 'f.-$"- t. J It was RESOLVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Ron McGreevey to APPROVE the APPLICATION. The Committee recommends that the sign be approximately aligned with the top of the first floor windows, Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. ( [' NORTH FORK CUSTOM AUDIONlDEO (6619 Main Road - Mattituck) It was RESOLVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Nick Planamento to APPROVE the Application as submitted July 28, 2004. The Committee thanks Mr. Salice for his cooperation in amending the earlier application, Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. ELEMENTS OF NATURE (56125 Main Road - Southold) It was RESOLVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Robert Brown to ACKNOWLEDGE the FULFILLMENT of the CONDITIONS set forth in its approval of January 29, 2004. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. THE OLD BARGE (Main Road - Southold) Robert Brown recused himself. It was RESOLVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Robert Keith to APPROVE the exterior lighting fixture, the CONDITION set forth in the approval of May 27, 2004. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. The next meeting was set for Tuesday, August 17, 2004. 7&Juii<Jtt~ . .. ~ e>s - ~: Land Planning Services April 15, 2004 Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 re: SCTM: 1000-83-3-4.6 8595 Cox Lane Cutchogue, New York 0 !E~!E~W!E ~ 1""1' I APR I 9 2004 Southotd Town PlanningBoarrl Dear Members of the Board: On April 2, I received a "Notice of Dissapproval" from the Office of the Building Inspector. The Building Inspector determined that the proposed uses for this site require site-plan approval. It was my intention to have submitted to you, a site-plan application on March 31. However, several of the plans are still in the process of being updated to reflect the existing conditions of the site. I am hopeful that the updates will be completed very soon and a formal application made no later than April 30. If you have any questions, comments or additional concerns, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Respectfull RQ ill Attachments cc: North Fork Resources, Inc. Valerie Scopaz, Director Planning Department Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Robert Fisher, Fire Marshal Ed Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement 8595 Cox Lane. Unit #7. Cutchogue, NY 11935 . 631.734.4036 . Fax 631.734.4030 email: r1hLPS@optonline.net . website: www.r1hLPS.com EDWARD FORRESTER DIRECTOR OF CODE ENFORCEMENT '. '$l.(~ e'S pe, Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1939 Facsimile (631) 765-1823 e-mail: ed.forrester@town.southold.ny.us e. . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 18, 2004 ~ ~ M: ~ 8~ ,:, ~ ~ rhl Planning Services Inc. PO Box 551 East Marion NY 11939-0551 Re; North Fork Resources property 8595 Cox Lane Cutchogue NY SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 Southold Town Pi2ij~1i'l;: B1airl Dear Mr. Hill, The property owner has indicated, through documents presented to the Town of Southold, that you represent him and are authorized to act as agent with regard to above referenced property. This letter serves as Notice of Violation and as confirmation of our conversation at the site on March 17,2004. The site has undergone extensive renovation, is currently occupied by several tenants and is operating all without proper approvals as required by Code. Specifically, renovation without Building Permits, failure to obtain Site Plan approval and occupancy without valid Certificates of Occupancy for uses present. You have indicated that you intend to seek these approvals and are prepared to submit applications for same in the near future. Please be advised that failure to comply in a timely fashion will result in legal action by this office Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, ~~ / Edward Forrest Director of Code Enforcement cc: Planning Board ./ Town Attorney Building Department .. 83-3-4.6 e- Chronology of Events -- . PrincipiBldg . - 2003 - 03/09/09 Inspection of Suter's potato chip making business. 1. Need Building Permit. 2. Need Planning Board approval. 3. Need Fire separations, min 2hr. ;fa- I~+ -r;o~ jj)~ P;)cr Building needs planning approval for changes. Need fire separations for individual occupations. Areas are from north side 1. Storage -lumber etc. (new windows) 2. Storage - gasoline operated vehicles, gasoline and fuel storage 3. Storage - gasoline operated vehicles 4. Sidor - under construction 5. Vegetable Express - operating 6. Foyer to second floor - fire alarm being installed 7. Top Gun electrical- recently moved out Took pictures 03/09/10 Letter sent Called M Sidor, left message that ducting system must meet NFPA 96 code. 03/09/11 Richard Principi called to set up a meeting. Called left message re: meeting. 03/09/23 Met wiul Bruno and Richard Principi. Told of procedure he must follow. 1. Submit site p;~n, get approval. 2. Obtain building permit as per appropriate codes. 3. Have proper inspections. 4. Obtain a Certificate of Occupancy. Remind that each occupancy may need a separate occupancy certificate. The above need to be done immediately because any work or occupation is not legal. 03/10/08 Reed letter from RLH Land Planning for paperwork on site. 03/12/02 Reed plans for Sidor Farms hood system. Need to be Type 1 hood. 03/12/16 Walt from All County Fire (874-3279) called to set up an appointment for inspection of the suppression system in M. Sidor's Potato Chip occupancy. Returned call and left message. 03/12/23 Call from Ronnie Hill re: Separations for occupancies. Met with Principi & Hill @ site to walk through fire requirements. May want a meeting on 12/30. Page 1 of2 . . 83-3-4.6 __ Chronology of Events -- . PrincipiBldg - 2004 - 04/02/19 Looked from outside. Observed the following. 1. 11 electric meters 2. new driveway and parking east side 3. units numbered 4. rlh Land Planning Services has an office on site 5. No apparent activity in potato chip occupancy. Page 2 of 2 ~ . 'l . . Land Planning Services Authorization Form Date: q. t C. . () ..3 I, Richard Principi owner of the premises located at 8595 Cox Lane, Cutchogue, New York; do hereby authorize rlh Land Planning Services Incorporated, to act as agent in my behalf in applying for all of the necessary approvals regarding the commercial development of the abovementioned property. Print Name: 'Pi ~ Signed: ~ STATE OFNEW YORK) ) 88.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On this 7th. day of October, 2003 before me came Richard Principi, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same. ~~+rt=. ~ ~NHAN Notary Public, State 01 New York No. 4908851 Qualified In Suffolk County 0 5" Commission expires OCtober 19, 20_ P.O. Box 551 . East Marion, New York 11939-0551 631.477.4215 . Fax: 631.477.1992 . . 0vtZJr 1'8 "87 - ~. Land Planning SeNices October 3, 2003 Planning Board South old Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: SCTM: 1000-83-3-4.6 8595 Cox Lane Cutchogue, New York OCT - a 2003 Sou\IIaId 'hi P1anni Baarf Dear Members of the Board: Please consider this a letter of introduction. As of September 16, 2003, rlh Land Planning Services, Inc. is authorized to act as agent for North Fork Resources Incorporated, owner of the above referenced property. See attachment. We are currently in the process of addressing the issues and concerns you have with regard to the development of my client's property. Therefore, a request for modification of the approved site-plan for this property is soon to follow. If you have any questions, comments or additional concerns, please do not hesitate to give me a call. RLf~~:' Ln'! ~i11 r Attachment cc: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Robert Fisher, Fire Marshal P.O. Box 551 . East Marion, NY 11939-0551 .631.477.4215 . Fax 631.477.1992 email: r1hLPS@optonline.net . website: www.r1hLPS.com ". . . 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-9502 Telephone (631) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD E;-3-3-i~ Fire Inspection Report 2003 September 10, 2003 Ms. Dolores Principi North Fork Resources Inc. 8595 Cox Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Ms. Principi: Thank you for the cooperation during the fire inspection of North Fork Resources Inc. on September 9, 2003. In reference to the storage building located on the property at 8595 Cox Lane in Cutchogue the following are required by Town Code. 1. Planning Department approval. 2. A Building Permit. 3. A Certificate of Occupancy. c Southold Town Code, Section 45-15 A. No change shall be made in the use or type of occupancy of an existing building unless a certificate of occupancy authorizing such change shall have been issued by the Building Inspector. B. No building hereafter erected shall be used or occupied in whole or in part until a certificate of occupancy shall have been issued by the Building Inspector. The above violations shall be rectified immediately. Principi-03-09-1 83-34.6 Page 1 .. . . , If you have any questions please contact me at the above office. Yours truly, kM4 Robert Fisher Fire Inspector Principi-Q3-Q9-1 83-J4.6 Page 2 ~ ;; .t e) ., ! . i Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax(516)765~136 Talephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD , 11'" ,~i . ", \ May 19, 1995 , ~ ~ Thomas S.Kohlman Sr. Vice President The Suffolk County National Bank P.O. Box 9000 Riverhead, NY 11901 (, /' ~ ~/s<N" / .~ \1" '\i c,~ 'f1 Re: Site plan for former Daval Tents and Party Services, Inc. slw/c Oregon Road and Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-3-4 ( / ; '. Dear Mr. Kohlman: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Thursday, May 18, 1995: WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board granted conditional final approval to the site plan dated April 30, 1989 on May 1, 1989; and WHEREAS, the applicant has agreed to the condition of installing curbing of entrance, driveway and interior parking area before transfer of ownership of the property; and WHEREAS, the site plan ordinance of the Town of Southold became effective on May 23, 1989; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the surveys dated April 30, 1989, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys. . .) ) . Page 2 Site plan for former Daval Tents and Party Services,lnc. May 19, 1995 Enclosed please find a copy of the survey which was endorsed by the Chairman. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, . . ~,/.U!~~ Chairman cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Scott Russell, Board of Assessors Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 . ) ) PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 3, 1989 Warren Sambach,Sr. P.O. Box 1033 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Daval Party Tents SCTM *1000-83-3-44 Dear Mr. Sambach: The fOllowing action. was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 1, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site plan dated as amended April 30, 1989 SUBJECT to the following: 1. A review by the Town Engineering Firm, Sidney B. Bowne & Son. 2. An agreement between the Planning Board and the applicant in regard to the treatment of the surface for the parking area.. If you have any questions, please do.not hesitate to contact this office. #> BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN jt cc: Al Falkowski Victor Lessard, Building Dept. ...~ 83.-3-4.6 12820 OREGON RD = OWNER & MAILING INFO ===I=MISC NORTH FORK RESOURCES INC I RS-SS C/O DOLORES PRINCIPI I 1 PO BOX 495 I BANK AMAGANSETT NY 11930 DATE: 07/18/2003 ROLL SEC TAXABLE TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 13 1======== ====== ASSESSMENT DATA =========== I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT I LAND 1,850 **TAXABLE** I TOTAL 7,850 COUNTY **PRIOR** TOWN I LAND 1,850 SCHOOL I TOTAL 7,850 ==DIMENSIONS ===1======= SALES INFORMATION ================================== ACRES 6.10 IBOOK 11768 SALE DATE 03/27/96 SALE PRICE 410,000 I PAGE 332 PR OWNER SUFFOLK COUNTY NATIONAL =======TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 =============1== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 ===== CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IFD029 IPK090 IWW020 I SWOll F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF .NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY SCHOOL MATTITUCK SCHOO~ PRCLS 130 MUCKLANDS 473889 SOUTHOLD 7,850 7,850 7,850 F1=NEXT PARCEL 75.10- 03-050 F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC F10=GO TO MENU . . - Authorization Form Date: q. t (j '0.3 I, Richard Principi owner of the premises located at 8595 Cox Lane, Cutchogue, New York; do hereby authorize rIh Land Planning Services Incorporated, to act as agent in my behalf in applying for all of the necessary approvals regarding the commercial development of the abovementioned property. Signed: ~ Print Name: " . 'Pi ~ STATE OFNEW YORK) ) 55.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On this 7th, day of October, 2003 before me came Richard Principi, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same. ~~+rt=.~ ~NHAN Notary Public. Slale of New York No. 4908851 Qualified in Suffolk County 0 r;- Commission expires October 19, 20_ P.O. Box 551 . East Marion, New York 11939-0551 631.477.4215 . Fax: 631.477.1992 . . WilLIAM WICKHAM ERtC J. BRESSLER ABIGAIL A. WICKHAM LYNNE M. GORDON JANET GEASA LAW OFFICES WICKHAM, WICKHAM 8. BRESSLER, P.C. 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK. LONG ISLAND NEW YORK 11952 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO. 631-298-8565 MELVILLE OFFICE 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD SUITE III MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 631-249-9480 TELEFAX NO. 631-249-9484 October 23, 2000 Att: Robert Kassner Southold Town Planning Board Post Office Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: North Fork Resources, Inc. - Amendment to proposed site plan modification Cox Lane, Cutchogue, N.Y. SCTM #1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Bob: I enclose for your review a Conceptual Site Plan map showing a proposal which would amend the current site plan application previously submitted to your office. The basic concept is to extend the loading ramp and parking area so that trucks will have sufficient room to pull in and back up to the loading dock and still maintain a proper traffic flow in the lot. The second concept is to add a driveway on the south side of the building so traffic flow is improved. The use of the property will continue as warehouse and storage with an office. While I have a few changes I would like to see made to the map, I would appreciate your comments so all changes can be addressed together. I think parking spaces should have been shown, and some typographical errors corrected. Please advise whether we can meet with the Planning Board at a work session to review their comments, or whether you would like to see a revised map first. Very truly yours, AAWldmc 30lshdtnpb !, tL . / /) J I CJi>P ~ ~tI:J~ Abigail A. Wickham I~". ~:_' t'! '.R"rqJ~ 'J F'.' ~;' lJ~f 252000 3outhold Town Planning Board GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS . t PLANNING BOARD MEMBl1:RS RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 18, 1997 Richard J. Principi 52 Foster Avenue Bridgehampton, NY 11932 RE: Proposed Site Plan for North Fork Resources Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Mr. Principi, The Planning Board has received your letter of February 6, 1997, requesting the Boards permission to use the above site for storage and repair of trucks and equipment and for the screening and storage of, topsoil, loam, clay, sand, gravel and stone products for later sale. The May 18, 1995, approved plan for this site is for office and general indoor storage. The Board requests that you submit an amended site plan for the use you proposed for this site. The Board will then expeditiously process your amended site plan application. If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact this office. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Gary Fish, Building Inspector , . 1m! ~ @ ~ ~ Wi ~ I~l h1: FEB 6 1997 : I ,,___, ! " HAMFTON MATERIALS AND HANDLING, INc.L__EiL February 6, 1997 Town Of Southold Planning Board Office Tel: 516 765 1938 Fax: 516-765-3136 Attn: Planning Board Members - Request to be reviewed at Monday Feb. 10, 1997 formal Planning Board meeting. Re: Proposed site waiver request for North Fork Resources, Inc. Cox Lane Dear Members of the Planning Board, After the work session on Monday night, Feb. 3, 1997, I am formally requesting for the board to consider allowing me to use this site for the storage and repair of my companies trucks and equipment and for material storage and material screening, not crushed. The material that we are requesting to store on the open, upper excavation existing portion of the site will consist of all off site materials (topsoil, loam, clay, sand, gravel, and stone products). At this point in time it would be difficult for me to put an accurate volume of material that will be stored at this site. But from my past experience, the stockpiles will not exceed 20 feet in height and be conical in nature (approximately +/-500 1000 yds. each material). But could exceed that amount during our construction season. The site will be used exclusively for our land improvement business. It will not be open to the public (private operation). I will guarantee that the site will be kept in complete organization and run professionally. The only type of mechanical operation on the site will be screening / sorting of this off site material. There will be no crushing on the site at this point in time. In closing, when given this opportunity develop my land improvement business from this site it will allow me to properly further develop this site at a later date done in complete accordance with all town approvals. I am enclosing an informal site plan and sketch plan of my intentions with some photos to better explain my type of operation. Sincerely, t<.-.\.A.P- f. Richar~principi . , 52 FOSTER AVENUE. BRIDGEHAMPTON. NY 1 1932 21-' 6 JAOKSON AVENUE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 1 1 101 (S 16) 537-7525 FAX (51 6) 537-5463 'Ji.'. t , b . ~'.,~g.rl ; .~ ' to'lt old J.01 'OQjl ~iHrJ.6::', I!e, cD 'dVr;' '~j~ ':.. . tl~r.=Ej~; ~~,~l' j.; g"", , i' '" '., -- " , .' VI' 2 ~ :r1 .tJ~~ o. ~ J '" ~ 0 z e a ,'(ii:ii.l "9.0 ;.;, ~ ,~ri Ib <' ~o. I > ~ . . '911 "''1''00'" O "q,,, "0 . ~. .i..'.....'!1~II. ill ", ' ! ;' .t,. t." . ". '" '",.. . '/:. , "'" I , '." . ",',"'., , ., . &'oQ,~:"'",/ '''.o.,'1)';'/.~ ~.""( . , ' '''," , 01\'.,. \. ",", . v-- "i\1 "-~:, J'; ,. " .~ .'.. " ('<~ ,...!;',<:\~ t, . ..'/. 0:9., :< , . ,"" \' ... . I ~.o '\ '\ J '.. 'hI.. , .. I . " ',''1>'" ...~~~. I. .. ......'., ..,,~ " I~ I f ..,\\ , '~/..~ .' "" ~, I~ '. J . . ". ..f....' tt.'" / "'"-~*9 / 1>'1' , ; 1 ~Ha.o. M3N . A.wno:! )(10~~nQ Ql0HlnOS;IO N.l\Ol. 3ngOHOln:l J. v " '''IQ"lT',ioI' ..10 'n~'''JY ~IQ, 'o~.~'lt4"\Q14i ~U"l' .I"'U~ftUhHI 'HlOIf'" M ~ )t~ ",l.)lI..' ....It1'AOO '.lHYoIHQS 1'111 JH~' Of. j'WH '1M hQ Olflf OhjH~V"."1 ,l.Jt-Wfll JW! WON" wo", I'OIllW 1tt.i.' 0,1, A"IHO ...,.h, "'lWl* "O~.:lH OJ! 'f')ltHl nJj"u)nn "'''0) 1(\v& (U1'iM, 1.0. OllfUIIN :J U "OM ,'..... '~)I C!lU.oUlJ -.0 ,.,,. QJIlHl '."61.1"'''1'1' ON't' 'JtlJ iD/'tWUt HII'I AJ.k\IM tnq iJ &2tiO;l_ . .n .....,,"'. ......,...,. ')14) J(J IOU HOI.l~~11l'J "(uj't"'lOl~'" III: UAwt'l1l tiki. QJ WOUllHI""Q HOU"",U'., oUIWM.ln~. . \ J , ( 91 ".9 .00' . ,,' .9&1 '~ 'QH eGiSl" AVW unlOI 'O;lQ 'lJr 'I>!SMo>llV,J '0 a311~lV 1l0J Awns '0" li1.,S "J l3Jra '. : , ,,', NoQ..",,~~~~~ ""':rNc.o ~O "3'1"" . PIJllI'.! - I WA\Vt!iL ~tJ,~.~t I' . ~ , , f f "8 10(1) t \ I ," , , I 0.... .:i I if ,,<" ,.' , ; I '..f ",,', . 'oj ';. , '.i. ,. '0 1" ;"'.' >"l"":".j' "'1;" ,', . .1' . l .'j . '1", ' " ";':'J', . .1" ~~ ;/"~':' ,',. I, ,~ \ J , . ( ,. f t \ .... ., , . I G "'" ")/') ... , "', ... \ J , . I I I' " ,C" " . . I.tO . ~ N-a rd' !..fU.'S -~- ~ ;. ." -;u utJ; J ,.1) LI . " . it>/",~i#17 1 i' '1-' " ;?) >> (:y. '. . ,.; ,', I,. ::. ':, :: .. ?";~M.~,~^~,");- ,."..,;R.t....{ ...'*, " .' ''-':.:i:''., ,~;;{<~:~:~,:. ;'1 ".,'~ "~'.i ,..11.....,\ ::t;t;:\~ ,. " X';'" "'\,' :. .'." ' .'., . - .' ," "/,"Y"-' ~r..::":; y,:' ,.,t.'". \ ."", ".',.:." :11'" .... ," 'I J .:.' .".\:;::~" . " .' ,\. ... ", '. ~,. ~.. ( .. ';:::'j .~. . '~S:~''f!!t'~:~;~'"r - , ." ....~ "'-, ".I' .' The Finlay 103/203 Hydrascreen range are the latest advancements in a three split screening and stockpiling system, designed primarily to work in conjunction with mobile and static crushing systems processing crushed and recycled material into graded saleable products. In addition the 103/203 can be used in conjunction with existing Finlay equipment. Built for the quarry, recycling and construction industries the smaller compact 103 Hydrascreen and the larger 203 Hydrascreen each offer the operator high capacity screening pertormance and efficiency yielding higher production of profitable products at lower costs. PORTABILITY The Finlay 103/203 range are guarded to the 'Mines and Quarries' specification and comply with all transport regulations regarding height, width and loading. Both machines are mounted on a heavy duty road chassis with site drawbar for maximum mobility. The 103 Hydrascreen is fitted with a single axle as standard whereas the larger 203 is fitted with a twin axle for maximum stability. Optional suspended, braked and ABS axles may be fitted if required. The 103/203 Hydrascreen range are raised and lowered by means of hydraulic jack legs. One off on the 103 and two off on the 203. Both are situated at the feed boot end of each machine which allows the machine to be raised and lowered in accordance with crusher feed out heights. The Finlay 103/203 unique compact design allows the unit to operate in very confined spaces and its high portability factor eliminates unnecessary set up time. POWER UNIT The Finlay 103 Hydrascreen is driven by a Deutz F3L 1011 F/(27.5 kw) air~cooled diesel engine whereas its larger brother the Finlay 203 Hydrascreen is driven by a Deutz F3L 912 (36 kw) air-cooled diesel engine. Both models can also power independent stockpilers. Each engine is situated adjacent to the control console at ground level providing easy access to all functions allowing the operator to quickly ~_rJ ~~~:I.. ~_.:~:~~ ~_~rJ..~.:~", ~_",..",~,:...~ .,~"'"'~""""~" ......,,,,,,h;nA rlA'''~ The 'Three in One' Compact Screener ...... ........, ~~.....i. ,-":': .~ Yo: SCREENBOX On the 103 Hydrascreen a 204m x 1.2m (8ft x 4ft) Screenbox is fitted as standard whereas on the 203 hydrascreen a 3.05m x 1.52m (10ft x 5ft) high capacity, two deck, two bearing spring mounted box which incorporates crash box, is fitted as standard. Each screenbox can be hydraulically elevated between 240 - 450. Optionally, an external tensioning system can be incorporated into the box to allow quick and easy periodic tensioning of bottom deck meshes. MAIN, SIDE AND FINES CONVEYOR The 103 Hydrascreen main conveyor feeding the 8ft x 4ft screen box is fitted with a 0.65m (26") wide belt with skirting plates running the complete length of the belt. The 203 main conveyor is fitted with a 0.8m (31") wide belt. All drive drums are lagged with tail drums being self cleaning, slatted design and flexible couplings are standard on each of the conveyors. Both the 103 and 203 side conveyors are fitted with 0.6m wide heavy duty chevron belts. All conveyors are folded for transportation /working position by built in hydraulic system, giving the machine the unique ability to be ready for road or site within minutes. But each machine has got varying stockpile capacities. The 103 hydrascreen side conveyor stockpile capacity is approx 128 tonnes (80m3) whereas the 203 capacity is 222 toones (135m3) On the fines conveyors stockpile capacities also vary on the 103 which has a belt width of 1 m (39") the maximum stockpile capacity is 62 tonnes (39m3) whereas this increases to 224 tonnes (140m3) on the 203 version which has a 1.2m (47") wide belt. CENTRAL CONTROLS c::.t;:Httc::tnn pnn;np m:'lin I"nmlf"lInr ~irlp I"nnVf'vnr~ ~I"rf'p.n finp.!,: 103 HYDRASCREEN o 1'1 II. TRANSPORT DIMENSIONS: 3.99m hei9ht x 2.5m width x 8.5 length I I A B C_ _0_ f-E F G H I J K 5'-5" 2'-1" 21'-7" 24'-0" 28'-1" 9'-10" 13'-2" 23'-7 4'-6" 3'-3" 2'-1" 1655 655 6588 7315 8567 3000 4029 7200 1372 1000 650 I I MACHINE WEIGHT 103 Hydrascreen - 8.4 tonnes 203 Hydrascreen - 14.1 tonnes The Finlay 103/203 Hydrascreen can be supplied fully roadworthy to comply with all international road and safety regulations to include full braking system complete with handbrake and or ASS, lighting system, crash bars, back bumper, mud guards and flaps, wheel chokes, M&Q guards, emergency stop buttons or any combination of these, some of which are standard features. TANK CAPACITY 103 Hydraulic Tank Capacity: 103 Diesel Tank Capacity 203 Hydraulic Tank Capacity 203 Diesel Tank Capacity 213litres (47 Gallons) 116 litres (25.5 Gallons) 5741itres (126 Gallons) 182 litres (40 gallons) BACK UP Finlay offer an extensive back-up service, from parts and spares facilities to material evaluation. Sieve analysis of the material type to be screened can be evaluated giving size and grade values of the material providing the customer with the precise and accurate information required in producing an economical and profitable product. o 203 HYDRA SCREEN Il . TRANSPORT DIMENSIONS: 4.0m height x 2.5m width x 11.4 length A B C 0 E F G H I J K 6'-2" 3'-0" 28'-6" 30'-2" 41'-11 13'-6" 16'-2" 36'-5" 5'-4" 3'-11" 2'-1" 1882 926 8684 9194 12781 4133 4933 11108 1626 1200 650 TONNES PER HOUR Up to 250 TPH achievable OPTIONS . Electric/Hydraulic Drive . TUV Specificaiton . Catwalk and steps around screenbox . Acoustic Engine Canopy . Vandal Proof Engine Canopy . Emergency Stop Buttons . Hydraulic Tensioning of bottom meshes . Braked axle ABS . Cascade Fingers on Top and Bottom Decks of Screen box . Axle Suspension . Stockpiler drives . Deutz BF4L 913 turbo engine (68 kw) on 203 machine . Feed Boot impact bars on 103 machine . Rubber lined feed boot . Feed boot extensions FInlay/ I . FINLAY HYDRASCREENS USA INC. P.o. Box 678 ...'1::.'_ ~"1""8"" ::01; 4, 1.. .t!./,,+ ~l"1 ( c .~ HAMPTON MATEr:?IALS AND HANDLING, INC. FAX COVER PAGE DATE: lfl:.-'/p,1l9c ~. This Is a cover pagp-. Transml.~sJon conslst.~ of all addlllonal--L_page(s). If you do nol recelv{' aJ] t ransmllled coples,please phone our oUlce. ,01 .\.). ,. rHOM: NAME: :;<" Ch~(:C-'t~"..()C, P. TELEPl!ONE NO: \'"37 - )S-) S'- OUR fAX NO: ,,-on - ..ry6':S ------..------------------------------------------------ --------------------.--------------------.----------------- TO: NAME: {J?".l,I.?,+ G. r;,~('~.- TELEi'l!ONE NO: 7{f ~ - /9 S g- FAX NO: /6' S- - .?/S?; REGArlU1NG: C (J>< (vnP CProjPc..-l 52 !="OSTER A.vENU~. eRICGEHAMPTON, NY 1 '932 21-15 .JACKSON AVENUE. LONG iSLAND Clrf, NY 11 10 f5161 53"7~7525 F"AX (S 16) 537-5463 00 "',.....~_..,.~..._.~.,._"'.:~_....-.--;,._.......,......... rn@rnD\Yl~rn1 'r Iii j ~Clf~ . S75DTHi)Li) 1'" --El,,[:.:,:~~~:~,;~:~-:_, ----~-~,..,. .---'--'-.-.--- \ / " c .~ December 10, 1996 Robert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1170 Southold, NY 11971 Tel: 516-765-1938 Fax: 516-765-3136 Dear Mr. Kassner and Members of Southold Planning Board, I am sending this letter to inform you of r.1y ir-tentions for the application of our Cox Lane Commercial p::oj ect. At this point, we are researching' all our options to maximize a completed proposal for the utilization of this site, which will be beneficial for both the Town of Southold and my family. We will continue on this application after the first of the year. We will be retaining legal counsel and planning services to complete this proposal in a timely and intelligent manner. I would also like to thank you and the other board membe::s for your patience in working with me in the past.I look forNard to developing this site with you in the near future. Happy Holidays! Sincerely, Richard Principi Jr. ;5~~e~~;~Ffl- ";;'~-' ... .~."M~~'~'.~__.,........~ ---..,_......._'....--"-<"---,,~.,....- PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ RICHARD G. WARD Chairman --'.----.-- -- o GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 17, 1996 Richard J. Principi, Jr. Box 323 Amagansett, NY 11930 RE: Proposed site plan for North Fork Resources Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Mr. Principi, The Planning Board reviewed your revised site plan and application materials dated August 28, 1996. Your application states that the site will be used for storage and repair of trucks/equipment, materials storage and materials screening. Town Code 81-4 G. stipulates that the moving of topsoil or other material on premises must be incidental to the approval of the site plan. The proposed six foot (6') slatted chain link fence and the double row of staggered six foot (6') evergreens should be sufficient for screening and noise retention. Therefore, it is appropriate to advise you early on that the Board does not consider the regrading and moving of 4,000 cubic yards of material to create a three foot (3') berm, which would be inside both a slatted six foot (6') chain link fence and a double row of six foot (6') staggered evergreens to be incidental to the approval of the site plan. In order for the Board to assess whether the removal of four acres of natural vegetation to create a four acre area of crushed concrete is necessary or practical for stockpiling materials, please indicate the location, type, amount, method of storage, height and bottom width of the stockpiles. '.,.~-"-.,.~~-~ c o The following changes/additions must be made to the site plan and application materials: 1. Front yard parking must be moved to create the required twenty five foot (25') front yard landscaped area. 2. Show handicapped parking space. 3. Indicate usage of area adjacent to Oregon Road entrance and exit. 4. Show location of off street loading area. 5. Specifications for screening equipment. 6. Depth of. crushed concrete. 7. Location of test hole and date. 8. Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF). 9. Application must be notarized. 10. Different uses shown on Short Environmental Form (SEAF) and application. This should be corrected on the requested LEAF. 11. Question number ten (10) on SEAF should indicate Suffolk County Department of Health Services and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. These agencies should be included on the requested LEAF. 12. Street trees in front of property must be within the property line. 13. Show curbing of entrance driveway and interior parking area as agreed to by the Suffolk County National Bank in conditional approval of May 18, 1995. 14. If access to undeveloped area is to be from the north east show details of ramp (road) construction. 15. Show details of leaching pool construction. 16. Copy of deed. 17. Location of any fuel storage drums, dumpsters, or other receptacles for storage of materials. 18. Sketch, in color, to scale of any possible outdoor sign. 19. Floor plans of existing building showing all proposed uses of floor area. Please amend your environmental form question # 11. The approval granted by the Board to Daval Tents on May 8, 1995, was a conditional ___N'~'''',_"~.,,,,,~,,,,-,,-,,,,,__~~,,,, ~) ",-~---"..-,",.,.~-, c "~ approval. The condition of installing curbing has not been met. Thus there is no approved site plan for your property. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has indicated to this Board that they wish to review this project because of the change in use and intensity of use. When the Board receives a revised site plan and application incorporating the above requirements, the Board will proceed with its review. Sinc~r,elYI \-'/~ I, I ,~I.l;< !'If'~ \ ~ Rb b~:(Ii} .' Kassh~/~...-" > -' '.-' Site Plan Reviewer cc: Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Laury Dowd, Town attorney Town Board ~~~ 0rg~~1:4( HI~ .........,"""'---~~""'''''''-"._.~~._'"-''..~.~-"- t"'" . I,:.t l~ - o .:> S>b~. % \Z~ cHi;) HAMPTON MATER.AL.S ANO HANDL.ING, INC. September 6, 1996 Via Fax 765-3136 Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Post Office Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for N0rth Fork Resources Cox Lane, Cutchogue / SCTM #1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Mr. Ward: We are in receipt of the letter from Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer, dated August 30, 1996, a copy of which is attachp.d, and are responding herewith. Wieh regard to our third revised siee plan, in order to achieve thp. results necessary to conduct business as per our requese, we would need to be able to move 3,000 to 4,000 yards of material, all of ';lhich would remain on-site. We are thet'efore formally requesting that we be put on rh~ Pl~nnina ~n~rd'~ wnrk sp.ssion schedule for Seotember 9, 1996, Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, 7-- \ 25 P ".- 6'"' Richard J. Principi RJP/ljc Attachmenls I ! SEP 9,~ l'o 13('~ I~I(" 52 F"CSTER AVE:NWE. a~tOGe:HAMPTON. NY I 1932 21 16 .JACKSON ......vENue. LnNG ISLAND CITY, NY , 1 101 \'51 tel; 5:37.7525 FAX (5! 611537-5463 "'--~~'-""f.Jr .:.':1... .41_,. ;\., PLANNING BOARD MF.M~S RIcHARD l: WARD Chflim111n ...;:;....',:..,....0 ...,~.~\UfFOl.t;~_.:. .V~ ~" ~ ,::) """" ~ ~ 0 . " '~en ~ i.:! '~,~ ~<I . """ . '- " - -.:.t. ~.,. . ~, -'10.[ + '+-~ ./ .-o....-:;:.~..~:,.:::~";/t.:t :j}....' :> (~EI.1R(;F RITCHIF. L\THi\..\1. JH RI''i;\;I'TT ORLOWSr.1, JR WILLIAM J CHEMEP.S KENNETH L F.DWARDS Town Hnll, ii,1095 \fKin Rond PO. nu~ 117~1 S"uth,)ld, ~ow York 11971 FllX (516) 765-3136 Tel.rhone ISH;) 70ii-1938 PLA..~ING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Augu"t 30, 1996 Richard J. Principi, .Jr. Box 323 Amaga.nsett, NY 11930 RE: Proposed site plan for North Fork Resources Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Mr. Principi, The Planning Buard received your revised site plan application dated August 28, 1990. Before the Board can proceed with its review of the plan, it needs tu know the amount of mat~rial to be moved. Please provide this Infol'mation in writing or on the plan as soon as possiblc_ By law. the Planning Board cannot give any final approval for a site plan until' all other approvals and permits ar~ sccurcd. Therefore, the Board needs to know, in writing, l! yO\! plan to continue with your salve,ge permit currently before the Town Board. When this infurmation is received, the Board will begin Its review. /i lit 7/1 1/ ( ~i~;)!~l~ I);j I ~ \_.1llif;;~ . Kassner Site Plun Reviewer cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Edward Forrester, Town Investigator I'" Y o :r\' I'1AMPTCN MATtl'llALS ANO ...ANOLING, 'NC. September 6, 1996 Via Fax 765-3136 MS. Judith Terry Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Post Office Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for North Fork Resources Cnx Lanf', Cutchogue / SCTM #1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Ms. Terry: Please be advised that, at this particular point in time, we wish to withdraw our current. application and plans for a salvage/transfer station at our Cox Lane site. Very truly yours, ?~ Q p,,-/- (~. Richard J. Principi RJP /l j c cc: Planning Board fo ,!3;/. /"I~ 5~ F'"OST~R AV~NUE:. 8RIDGEHAMPTON. NY ll932 21 -I 6 .JACKSON AVENUE, LaNu ISLAND CrTY NY 1 1 J a 1 [~1!5133?7~2S F"AX lS161 537-5463 ..-, C PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~nJZD0 ~c;,\lHOl.ti"'" t~.~ en ~ ~ ~ 4:." ~""~ ~O./ + 't.~ ffi '0.,- Aj! . '<?-=r:dv ...... ..",,; Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 30, 1996 Richard J. Principi, Jr. Box 323 Amagansett, NY 11930 RE: Proposed site plan for North Fork Resources Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Mr. Principi, The Planning Board received your revised site plan application dated August 28, 1996. Before the Board can proceed with its review of the plan, it needs to know the amount of material to be moved, Please provide this information in writing or on the plan as soon as possible. , By law, the Planning Board cannot give any final approval for a site plan until all other approvals and permits are secured. Therefore, the Board needs to know, in writing, if you plan to continue with your salvage permit currently before the Town Board. When this information is received, the Board will begin its review. @Jt!!t~ Site Plan Reviewer cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Edward Forrester, Town Investigator -~.--....~---- ,.... '"' ~ -...I __"~'______.~_"_m_"_ Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: G1ifYje,( Prirx:.-ipi Date: bll'1]"1 Y Subject: N F IC e.sourc.es, ~c... SCTM#: 83- ~-I.f. ~ Comments: $/'/50 ft( a.ppl. prlflt; cAec{ tJ., d,.-"lw"., ;',,; AUG 2 9 \996 .:5l.l..eF 1>5 - aM.. RK- GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS _(:.:::...:::;::;;:;;~?:c~ J" -:,llfFOl'" ~ .:f~ '1~", ',f "',;lIt)/, " v~. (;.".:0':-', (,',~' ~"",. ({:::>> ' ~0 ~ Q . '--i ~<n ..,~ 'N . - Jy ,,~ ~.. ~...." ""'.;J' _ 'YA. ,....<::." y ~O./ .. ~~.,c::-';' ~::Z:-~,.-O.-~ ( - P~NGBOARDMEMBERS~ RICHARD G. WARD Chairman Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 21, 1996 Richard J. Principi, Jr. Box 323 Amagansett, NY 11930 RE: Proposed site plan for North Fork Resources Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Mr. Principi, The Planning Board received your facsimile message on August 14, 1996, requesting a waiver of site plan requirements. Your new proposal as stated in the site plan application for screening and stockpiling sand and gravel together with striping and stockpiling approximately eighteen inches (18") of topsoil and twelve inches (12") of clay, in addition to placing six inches (6") of recycled concrete blend in the proposed driveway/roadway constitutes a change of use and an intensification of use from the previously approved indoor storage and office use. As mentioned to you in the Board's letter of July 31, 1996, (copy enclosed) the Board does not have the Authority to authorize the moving of topsoil unless incidental to the approval of a site plan. The Board would need to know the quantity of material you proposed to move and stockpile in order to determine if it is incidental to the proposed site plan. Accordingly, the Board finds it cannot waive the site plan requirements and recommends that you file an amended site pian application, environmental form, and site plan showing the proposed new uses and all details of the plan such as the amount of material to be moved and/or stockpiled or removed, and the location of the proposed driveway to the rear. _e..._"~'_"_~__+<''''''''_''~"_'''''_'_-"''_'_'''''''''__'''''''''_~'"~'~._'~ - c '- Your application is also incomplete as there are no site plans included with the application. In addition, your facsimile message and incomplete application does not agree with your Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) which mentions the recycling of materials. Due to the above reasons your incomplete application and check are being returned. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. ~d?-v Site Plan Reviewer cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk .Jean W. Cochran, Town Supervisor Charles Voorhis, Town Environmental Consultant Town Board '-"'--'AU....-~ =,,',:;> . u i : 44 i"-'r41 1,:.1 ,_1~.:.l4':l.;)..:;."+ 1 _, 4 -:..1:;.1..;.;.1;;.;;:;.:., I ,t:;KL '( _ i Ii .;:;-:...:?~!. +4.,;;.4::,-~"~M_~~ P. t.t 1 c o ~ p~ R~ Oear Mr. Oick Ward, We are writing this letter to clear up a few of our intentions rOt' O~ll' site on Cox Lane. (1) What we want to do at this site is pt-epare the remaining, undeveloped portion of this so to allow us to screen. stockpile, maneuver our equipment in r.he upper section of this property. (2) To clarify-"prepare " we need to strip and stockpile our sice according to several (6) test hole data. (.. or - 16 inches of topsoil), (.. or - 12 inches of clay) . ((3) In and along proposed driveway/roadway we will put in place 6 inches of RCA (recycled concrete blend), to allow us to conduct business in winter months and during wet mOllths. ((4) Upon review, of this revised application and request. We w01)ld like to know if we qualify to have our site application "change of use onlY" be waived. we eagerly await your reply. Sincerely, \~fCha{d P(f.I1CiPi t oOloredpriI1CiP..L.' .' ~~ ~ c.~ *"N per our explanation, we want to use the cun-ent site p}~ that we submitted in July,1996. . . ~he only change would be, there would be no removal of material. '>- 'Ii P ",;, f? ..t 1_'_' ......'''....-..---." , !\UG I 4 ,qgn ..d ^ fl 90 C I :,) AUgust 6, 1996 Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Tel: 516-765-1938 Fax: 516-765-3136 'Y\ d.ra.LAI~ c...h~c. I Attn: Mr, Dick Ward Chairman to Planning Board Re: North Fork Resources, Inc. Richard Principi, Jr. Dear Mr. Ward: After the work session Monday night, we reviewed all our options with Ben and the other board members. At this point in time, we will resubmit our revised application and site plan reflecting the discussed changes. We would appreciate your prompt review and consideration on this application. Thank you, 7~1 ~ r-- ~> Jr., President Richard J. Principi, AUG I 2 :5J.;.if- P.f> -R~ -r. A--rrNL{ _ -["~ '-_._"".'"-".~' PLANNING BOARD MEMBES; RICHARD G. WARD Chairman ~-".:;:,~~~-~- {' LL"<;,\\fFOL,('~ .;~.~ "0. ~ .['.Y'~ % ~". ~ -~ .~ Q ~ ~. ,tn :C=Ej ~ J:!.', ~. . "",."'i ~Q.I + ~~~~/ <<O-~.::J;f o GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1I79 South old, N ew York 1I971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 31, 1996 Richard J. Principi, Jr. Box 323 Amagansett, NY 11930 Re: Proposed site plan for North Fork Resources, Inc, SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Mr. Principi: Yesterday the Planning Board received your revised application and site plan dated July p, 1996, and revised Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF). Chapter 81 of the Southold Code provides that the Town Board may issue an excavation permit for parcels in excess of 20 acres in size. It contains an exception to this rule for the moving and/or removal of topsoil or other material on premises subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board, when authorized in writing by such Board incidental to the approval of such site plan. After reviewing the plan you have submitted and the oral representations you have made concerning that plan, the Board concludes that your proposed soil removal operation is not incidental to the site plan, but is the primary thrust of your activity. The removal of 20,000 cubic yards of soil, gravel and sand is an enormous quantity of material, and you have indicated that this is the primary purpose and activity at the site. The Planning Board has no jurisdiction to issue a permit primarily for excavation. On that basis the Board is returning your application for a site plan. Should you wish to present a site plan application in which soil movement is slight and incidental, the Planning Board would be willing to consider it. However, we feel that it would not be prudent for you to expend further time and energy on a soil removal site plan which is . . c o Page 2 Proposed site plan for North Fork Resources, Inc. July 31, 1996 beyond our power to grant. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact this office. rei .. - ' /;!1Y~ rd G.~rd encs. cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Jean W. Cochran, Town Supervisor Charles Voorhis, Town Environmental Consultant T own Board , ::>:=;:;-~=::~~ /~~~.~ ':.Il,.raL/( t'~~ ..:.~ ~... ,,',::, :;...lo :. .. .- -"" ,. ::~ . " , "" ~ : ~o .. ,..,.,.~ ~ . ~_... "- 4-", ~'t- .'/ ~O.i -+ '1-~~-:/ ~~_-c-- PLAJ.'1NING BOARD MEMB:'O RICHARD G. WARD Chairman o Town Hall, 53095 ~rajn Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. )few York 11971 Fax ;'516, 765-3136 Telephone (5 1.6) 765-1938 New _Change of Use _ Re-use ExtenSion _.Revlsion of Approved Site Pian . :;EORGE RITCHIE LATH..lu\1. .'1<, SENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR W1LLL.lu\! J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ,\Iame of BUSiness or Site: Lccar:icn: .~ddress: ,\Jame of .1.pplicam: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: Agem or Person responsible for application: Address: Telepnone: Site plans prepared by: Ucense No.. Address: Telephone: Oa(2 Received Date CompleteC Filing F~e PLAt-iNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPUCATION FOR CONSiDERATION OF A SITE PlAN '-""'~~"-~~ ,_._v.~ ..,.~~-...~...;... ..~.-.-;~.. JUL 2 6 '~"r ,'---I'" '-.-..... '--.. 1bL ~ ~K- ~~ '::DIe.. f)S C\~ CcSt.-- la-~ + \ ZQw O~~ w 0.u+ (1u:f'-~ I ~'e.LU ~ Ri~ P~lnc~ ~ 3z.-=:, ~Yt~ lV1.J llQ-1sa '5 3l ~ l's-L '$' ~(\tv.ud ~('1~ -fulAtl vr4 ?~~ ~IS'i-_ 3 L 3 ~~2Vlsd:f- 'fJ4 Ilct ~ -=?3"l. . I S?.- ~ -_~~\~N;Y6r )~ ~ _ :37---0 I ~. lJLvLQ. I ~rzJL I \i\I1.{ Il'1 s. L 2q~ - ~<+~O P-Q..Cd\.u.c..... <;;t.\.J'v~ c:lY3 c o Pac;e 2 :~',..., u1ing Beard Site ':)!an ACCliC<i1:ion APPUCANrS AFRDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK \? I ~~ "- n~ ",og delV """m. "P'"'' 'cd '"'' ,,,,", '"'''' " . . 2:, ) ~ ,~2V1~ 'tvtI_llq::yo In tl1e State of New York. and tl1at he is tl1e owner of the above property. or ::!lac he IS ehe yre4illx0" mtlel of tl1eYaYth ~ L Qe Si\A-;)O..O JJ.n c.. (Spec:fy wr.etr:er?'3n:r.ers"lc or Corp.) which is hereOy making application; that there are no exlsong SITucrures or ImprovementS on me iand which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the otle to the entire parcel. inc:ucing ail nghts-cf-way. MS been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no pant of G'le Plan infnnges upon any duly filed plan wnlch has net been abandoned both as to iots and as co roads; Chat he has examined ail rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site plans and Will comply With same; tr,at the plans submitted. as approved. Will not De altered or changed in any manner Without the approval Gf the Planning Board; and tl1at the acrual phYSical improvements Will be Installed In SITict accordance With the plans suomltted. Q- Signed (Partner or Corporate Cfflcer and Titlel s,;;,qr~o me tl1IS II _ ,z') ~ay of it' 11 A Y 19 96 /1/: 1'''--'/ - / 'Lv/.. I A.',' l. / ' /' .IL<'~'---&L_~__ (Notart PUblic] HELENE O. HORNE Notary Public. State of New York No. 4951364 Qualified in SuHo!\ '::':'1' "'1 () 7 Commission Expiies :\:: c. " I ~~,~,-----.~",-----_.......~~,."..,.., o o ,=-;ce 3 .:)I-.''''m'1Q' 30ard Site =lan Acolica1:Ion ~Tocal Lana ,A,rea of Site (acres or square feet) '\ . -::r:. Zoning DisUlCl: EXlsung Use of Site ~~ Proposeo Use of Site \1\ n-1:.R...~ U Sh57Je.uOkd / P'\,'JC.Q..S<.uI-f ~~ I ~ ~ \\~..;, ~~D"'-.,i- '0~.d ',,,, ("~~G'\-.. \' ." -~ Gross F! r Area .. existing S ctUre sJ ,...-...x, - Gross F!oor Area of Proposed StructUre(s) '::;010 Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) \ D "1 c Percent of Lot fer Parking (where applicable) f \ '\ ~.. 2..'/. ) Percent sf Lot fer Landscaping (where applicabie) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or spedal exception by -N'b Board of Api=eals .. Case # & date '" lh Board of Trustees.. Case # & date !IJb NY State Department of Environmental Conservation.. Case # & date ",IT) SuffOlk CcuntY Department HealO1 Services .. Case # & date Case ,\lumber Name of APplicant Date of Decision Expiradon Dace Other V\O Will any ,oxic or hazardous materials, as defned by the Suffolk CountY Board of Health, be srored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of issuing agency Number and date of permit NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDE/?TAKEN UNTIL APPl?OVAL OF SITE P!AN BY P!ANNlNC BOARD. VIO!A TORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION "'~.~-~".~~-----"-"<._"~'~~"-'''-'-~--'---''--._-~._' ...-...............-...-...-...... , ;~ :.~. -3f:~ ".",. ~~' '-- -- o 617.21 Appendix C Slate E:wironmentaJ Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I-PROJECT INFCRMAT10N (To be c::mclered by Applicant cr Pmject sponsor) ~""'l6-L ;:la7l-7~xl 12 ?RO.;EC7 1.0. .'-IUM8ER SEQR _':J L /'\~ <0Sq ~ U,~aa 'n't;::,":ont :~'~D "av~'V'- ~ ~ -:tt:: PI'\.. tl ~ 2_ p, The I Munlcioalily LLQ.. C~unty I J. " .~"f.- -+e.n.d a. '> ~" ?,-XL.rvtL---t..e.-V" -K~ ~\sfi.t\.f ~'--f ~ ~ clJd.ad~ .::;:.Lta.. ~ c;K.Ci ~~. a.... \a.vvis t>e'fY'n (Q...~ y- ~ to. 2- ~ I I I I I ~~ 20. QJ7fzf1S I i lOCO- ~~-o~ - 4.1o 5. IS ?RCPOSc:D ACTION: n New ["i E.'Ccansion r-; .\r1odificationl31:eration . 5. DESCRI8E ?AQJEG7 8RIE?':_Y: '" AMOUNT OF LAND AFF=C7ED: Imtlally acres Ultimatelv .lc:"es 3. WILL :~ROPCSc:2-"'".97iON COMP'_";' WITH S<IS'ilNG ZCNING OR OTHER ~(JS71NG LAND USE .=lE5TrlIC7;ONS? ~ Yes I~\lo!f ~o.::escrlbe oneily 9. 'NHA i IS PRESENT LA~E IN '/1C:Nlr(~F ?ClCJEG7':' o ResIdential; L industrlal C].6'mmerc:al DescrIbe: L-l,.;gric:.:ilure r-; Parl<JFarestlCcen :;oace I ; Other 11. _i?9ES ANY ).SP~~ OF THE ACT:OU HAVE A CUAAE."ITL'f 'IAllD ?~i=lMIT OR APPROVAL? "0 Yes C1 No It 'Ie~. lIst agency Mme and cemuUaccroval ?o,,::>~ .,-- ~ ~J'XY.v.!r / N If 'S ~ ~0-\c.lu-"'-f I I I I ~~~t ~c. C~ ~~:l 10. DOES ,.l.CT10N iNVOLVE A ,::IERMIT APoRQVAL :::A ;:::JNOING. .'10W OR UL7";MAT:=!..Y :=;:;:CM ANY 0 I HER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDE:;AL. STATE Ojl LOCALl? 5?Yes [} No It ,!~s. list .lqenC"/tSl and ::ermlt/aoorovalS ~ur.G\L U~ ~ ~"o ~ Se.v\A<:.a.5 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL Z<lSTiNG -,~ERMITrAPPRovAL .~ECUIAE MCDIFiC).,T10N? OyOO nNo I CSTlFY "fHA, THE INFORMATION ?ROVIDED A80VE IS 7RUE TO THE 3EST OF .'-AY :<NOWLEDGE ","oollcanlJsponsor name: R\cjA,~~ d? --- ~~ Oalo: ~ I Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form beiore proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 I I I i , I ( I \-..1 , I I I i I ~~-i6.2 :~2.371_7C 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Revie'"" FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSiV1ENT FORM sc:eR . o r '- ?urpose: The rui! E..:d= is designed m ;'elp aoplicancs Jf".d agenc:es determine. in ~n orded'l ;.....,anner. wnet~er .1 'Jro!l~-:: or dc~ion mav oe Si~11lnC.Jnt. Tile ques\:ion or wnecne!" an ac::an mav '::e SI!~!'1iric2.n( is .ioe .llWdV5 easy :0 answer. ~:"e~uer'.c- lv, there are asoec:s or a orojec: thai: are 5ubieO:::lve or \Jnmeasureabie. It is aiso '....:nderstocd :hac ~hose wile ce:er!r.~r:e significance mav have little or no rormJ.l knowiec.ge or :;,e ernllronmenc or ma.'! be cecr:nicailv ex.cert in environrr.e!1:';: analysIs. In addiClon. many who have knowledge In one par:ic'.llar area may noe oe aware or :~e broader concerns aifec::r.g the question or signifiC3.nc~. The full E.~F is intended to provide a mechod whereby aoaiiC3ncs and agencies CJ.n be 3ssured that. the de!:erminaticr: process has been orderly, comcrenensive ~n nature. 'fee fle:-tlole co allow introduc;:!On or inrormaclon to fit a prOlec: or ac::cn. Fuil EAF Components: The full E.~r is comonse-:lor :hre-e oans: PJrt 1: Provu:::es obiec:ive data and information about a given prolec: and its site. By identifying basic .:Jrojec: data. it assists a reviewer in ui-te analysis that: takes piac: In Parts 2. and 3. P:lrt 2: Fccu:ies on ident:1fving r.he range or possible imoac:s that may cCC'.Jr from a Jroiec~ or aC:10n. It prcvlC:es guidance =.s to wner.her an imaae: is likeiy :0 ~e CGnslcered smail to moderate or wnetner !t ~s a ;JCte!"lt.la1i'l~ laige :moac:. The forr:1 also !dentlfies ",,-,hecher 3.1: rmeac;: can '::e rnltig:ated. or reduced. . ?Jrt 3: If anv imoac: ~n Part 2 is ide!'lcihed J,S :oce!'loailv-iarge. ~he!'l P3.rt J is used co evaluace '",nether' or not :;-:e :mpac: IS acwailv imcorcanc DETER.\-\INA nON OF SIGN IFiCJ..~CE - Type 1 Jnd Unlisted Actions rdcntiiy the ?ortions oi EAF completed for this project: ,- pJ.("i: 2. CPar: 3 P3.rt '- r , '- Ucon :e'llew or :he inrormacion ;e-:orced on chis ~.~F (P3.rt:s 1 and 2. ana.) :r aporoortctei. and any other H.J..Cccr~il"'ig inrormation. and c:Jns;derim~ both :he ma!;ituce and :moortancc or ;:3.C;' imqac:. :t is reascncloiy aeeermlnec by :he lead JlienC'( that: c:: A. t~ne ~roie;;:t '.'Iii! not ~esuit !n any !<lrge and imcortu.nt impac:(s) Jne. :herefore. is one which ',Viii not have a slgmriCJ.nt impact on the environment. :hererore .1 negative ded~rJ.tion wiiJ be prepared. B. Although che project could ha.ve a significant erfec: on the e:1vironment. there wiil not be a significant. effec: for ::his Uniis\:ed Action because'the mitigation measures.cesG1lJeo in PART 3 nave been ieQuiret.i. therefore J. CONDITIONED rlegative ciedar;].tion wiil be prcp~red." o C. The proiect mOlV result in one or more !arg~ ane important impac:s that mav have a significant impac: on the environment. therefore :t positive ded~rOltion wlI1 be prep.ned. . A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Uniisted Actions ~ ~c.. . i.L ~M"" 0 D The... Name or Acrlon ~ ~~ ~O-^d L~.J.d :\I:'.:nC'1 ~~ '.'\l:~r.CI T:c:e or Kcsponsloit: OHic!.:,. SiL;rlJ.(Ure cr :~c~{)onSliik Otftl'i":~ :n i.~:.~c:i ,.'\l:"oc'., Sign.dwre 0i !1'c;::J.rf.:rt.lr :j!ifL'~e~t :rolll ,e5Ponslol~ crfrC::~i ~l-o~,~~qlp .~ -- . PART 1-P~OJECT INFOR"vlp~N P:-epilreci by Project Sponso" .'J0T:C=: T:,is dcc:Jme:!! :5 cesigne-:i :0 aS5is~ tn de':.~~:rllr:l:'1l,; ..vne<:.r.ct ::-:e JC::Cr. :rccc~e-::l .--:1':'" :'<l'le J. )1~:1dic:lnt ~rfe< on ~he environment. ?!~3.se (-:)mpie':.e .:he entire icrm, p~(;;S ,-\ :hrou'~h :. ..\nsw,=:"'S ;:0 :~ese Gue~~lons wlil be cons leer'?' 4..l.S ;Jar;; or ,:t1e J.cpiic.1cior. for ,Jocrovai Jnd may ~e 5uolec::o :ur:~er '/er:fic.:>~;cn J.nd ;;UCIIC ,-e'new ?~ovlde any .;cc:::cr..l inrormacion '(OU 'Jeiie'/~ ,....iil !)e ....leeced ~c ccmqie<:.e ?:!n:,$ 2 J.nc J. [t is exce-::ed chac comcie':.!on or :he ~Ull EAF '.vlil :e cecencenc -:)n !r.ror:-n;:;.::;cr. c'.J(re!"!::v .1V3.dacie 3.r.d '.',iil noe. !nvcilJ' new j;:udie~. research or InvestIgation. if inrormaClon ,-ecu:r:ng: such ~dc:r:ol"1J.i 'sori-:: is unavJiiJ.ole. 50 tndica~e and 5oe-:;f. eac;, Instance. NAME OF ;.c;"iQN Norm Gric ea ~~CaP :th c ... \"2- ~ L.D C:TYIPO ~ i S-.-- , =~SiNass \EL;..~S!!l S '2... ~CCfie5S C;TY:PQ S7..:.'iS i :!? C:::::::; JE3C","T:CNC"^C,lCN I ~ ~l..b~ lA.dcrv, + ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ (lJVJPo/~~~ ~\I~?~~~t)\~ tto~. ~ ~~ ~ j;W"~ ~ 0/ ~ 0 ~ .--Th rt:"c.yck ~ pth MtCWiClJ..a ?!C.lSC Compleith E.1cn Ouestion-Indic.::lte N.A. if not ~ppiiC:lolc A. Site Desc~iption Physical setting or overall pro lee:. 1. Present Land use: CUrban CFores;: boch de'/eloped Ctnduscriai C::.~gr1cujture and unde'/c!oped '=Commerc:aJ =Other areas. :=..~eS!dentlai ()uourb.:;.n) CRur<:i1 (non-far:':": T otaJ aCI'C3ge or projecc area: APPROXIMA TE ,~CRE....GE Meadow or 8rushiand (Non-:1gric:.dtural} Forested Agricultural (Inc!udes orchards, cropl.:lnd. P;lS{u:--e, ,..:~c.) 'Net!.Jnd (Freshwater or tidal J.S ~er {\rtide:> 2,1 :5 or EeLl 'Nater Surrace ,\rea Cnveg~!a[ed {Rock, earth or fiil1 Roads. buiidings and other ::J~1Ved 5urrJ,ccs Other (1ndiCJtc~'/pc) J,ces. 4 ?~ESc;,"TL ':' .~c:es JCTeS "HER. COi..,IPL:,iO," acres - ac:"cs JC':s aC-ies 4 .1c:"ej J.crcs ;';,ces aCiE~S - ,';,C'es J.C:"'~s c.. ,1GeS aces ,a:res ~~~jd:~~j ac:~s 3, 'Nhac is predornln.1nt jod;''/f)dsi on ;1roiec: )lie? c1. Sod dr;llnJl.;~: ~Ne!l, d:~lne~j ----lt1:l- % i.-:r~Or:\' ,::r;::,:rwd ('Jr <,lte '7~ or 'I~.e l~. ,Ii ;1[(: b. :f )IlY J~r:cd(ura! !':~I.C .5 :llvojlJl(~W '!l.:nv c:c{'<; ,:)r '(lli Jrp .."SSlf';l": LJ,nu C:a.SsdIC.1O::Cn ;1;''StC~lll ~ .le,-',,:,) ,:5'~',: : ,'J'((':\R Ji"n1 ,\rc ~he!'p bed:ock i]L;tC:"ocplngs on ~rolec: )iCl'~='(;~'5 ~) . .. I _".".... (' ~. 'N;'Jt is de~th :0 bedrock? ~ :in fc'.!~) .',lcnlll ,cd ;fOllP 1 dHOl:-:;;' .: Qr :~c "i':': ". .r '..... J. ..\,::crox:rn.:~= :;t:~c=rH,,:"':~ or 0f(}oosef~! ;Jroiec~ ,Ice with ~:c]:e... . 6. Is prOle-:::: SLlbs~J.nciaiiv .:::;ntl:;~OU5 ~O. or con pin .~ ~ud<..ii;1g. Regls~ers ;Jr :-iisi:Qr:c ,:JL:c=s? =Y~5 ~o 7. -Is prOI~(: 5ubs;:~nClailv concig'.Jcus :0 J. site !Isle.: 'In ~he ~e~ls;:e:" or "~a~:oncJi .'tacurili ~J.r:c!m,:lfi<$? 3. INhac is :he de::nh or :he water ~acie? 3..t5 (in :~~~) :::U-1O~~, ,'. ,u ;().15% ~/:) =15% or .rer 2-D ;ite. or ;jiSi:ric:. :is;:ed 0n che '~::. SCJ.te or the >.jacionaJ '=Yes .~ 9. Is site ioc~~ed ove!' .1 primary. princ:pal, or soie SOurce aeuder? '=Yes ~o iO. 00 hunting, fishing or sheil fishing oopon::unlcie~ presentlv exist on the prolec: J.rea? Cy;?S eNo 11. Coes ;:lroiect sIre concain any species or pianc or anu":1al lire that is identified as :hrea~ened or endang~red? eYes ~o According ~o :dentlry eac;, 5pec:es i 2. A re there any eYes uniaue or ~o unusuai land forms on ~he qrore'::: site? (i.e.. C:lffs. dunes. other geologiC:lJ formaClons, DescrIce iJ, is .:he ~~iec: iit=- o;esentfy us~d by. {he I....; (es l~O If yes. explain communiC"f or .'1ei~hborhood as an open space or ,ecieacion area? Does the present 5iSJi" induce scenIc '1iew'5 known ,0 be impcr:anc :0- ~he communlcy;. CYes ~o is. Streams within or contigf..Jous to proiec:: area: Y'On ~ a. Name or Scream ana ,1ame or River ::0 '.v(,IC;' !c is ,noucarv 14. 16, Lakes. .:Jonas. wetland areas within or conClguous m ;:rolec: area: a. :'Jame V\Dn e. ~. Size (In aces) ",,- 17. Is r , .1 "- oj ~he :ilce served by e:<iscing public ucliicies? des '=I'JO If '(es. does :iUrficienc caoac:cv ~xisr to allow connec!on1 =Ycs =No If Yes. wTiI imorovemencs be necessary to Jilow canne-:::cn? !=Yes ,=No ", i3. Is the Site iocated in an a~rlC'Jjcuraj jistnct certlried ;lurSlI.:lnc :0 r\gric..:iture ane .\r\arke~s Law. ,-\.rnde 2S-AA. Sec:ion 30J 'Vi'a 3047 DVes :~O Is the 'Site ioc.Jtea in or 5uost.arlCJ.:lilv conciguo~s/o a C:,i~icJ.J cnvironrnenc.ai .-,rea d~signaced pursuant ;:0 An:ic~e 8 or the EeL. and 0 NYCRR oi71 eVes ~o "Q ,_. 20. Has the :iite ever been used ror the di'5posal of solid or hazardous 'Nase'no:S.? CYc~ rs;A 0 B. Project Description 1. PhysiciJ! dimensions and scale oi project (fiil in dimensions as <lppropn<ltel J. T oeal conciguous Jcn~a~e owned or concrollt:d by prOlect sponsor Co. c2- .1Ges. b. Project. Jcrea~~ co be developed: to. '2.. acrc~s jniri~dl'l; <.0. <..... .:1C:C~ '.Jitim,J,tc!y. c, ProiC~: ocreow" to remain undel;.!oPcd '^ ~cres. d. Length or project. in miles: ~ (If .1ppropriatel e. If the j1foicct is an expansion. indic.:w! ocrci'm or ("q1anSlofl ;1rnposed ~ %. t. ,'Jumh(~~ or oif.jtreet i)ilrklnt; }n.1C~S (~.'Cls\irl/: 'be. ;)rooo...ed ~ g. 1....laxlnwm "JehiI.'JJc1r tnps gCfwrul'cd per hOllr S (upon ~:':Jmr:it'~ion or pro ice!? h. if LC~JdcnCiai: ,'1umo(:r .Jnd (vpe or hOlJsinl: 'HUr,;: Onl' ,~J.mrtv T......I) ';'.1 f'T1I I',' ,\'lllit:r:ie i-.:mdv Cor:dOfl1ll~:lIrn l Inltt..Ilv U I tlm.1{c!V ;ors'",( :Jrc(Jn",~ ;UuCUre ~ "e'~;lC: .4- '.V""" ~ Ic"~'~ Jjant; ,J .:Juoil( ~~crnu~hr,J,rc ;JrOleCl ',vlil occ.....PV ;'51 -fr- it. . ~ ~~I'a.~~ ~ .Q;y-*~ ~~ r\1... <1-Q I. Dimen~lons (in :::~~: or !. L:nC.Jr :cet oj rronl'Jt;C -...... ., :-10W muc~ n,1~w'J.i i!l~.(e!'"!_:l .' ".'''C<. .Jr:h. .,c" w,i1 :". ,emnv,'u ,.~ :~e ".,,' '2.l),Ob :on>lcub,e '/Jro5 J. 'Nill ,:js~urbed Jr~J.j :;e rec.... s~ \JZy~$ =Nd =:--.Il,\ - 0 I J. if ',e5. ier '.vho' ,"toocL._ ~ur~ose ,s .he 5lt~ ee,"" reda"ne",~a....aVt1.ra ~.'SJ.."'1'''' ':I. \:l/iii :opsod ~f: 5l:ockaded ror ;edam.Jt1on? ~~5 C~O :;j,i,~ ".. \Viil '..locer ::iLlcsod be 5i:cd::alied fer ;ed.:lmJ,Clonl !~('S i=,"-JO How :nanv ac,es Qr veg~'ation (crees. shrubs. ground eov~rsl wdl oe removed '.0"" site' ~ aces 5. l..vii! any mature rorest (ove:- 100 years oidl or ocher !ocJilv.imooftunt v~~e!::l(IGn J~ ~emove.J bv this proieo:::? ~='(e5 i~O or constrvc"on ~(T10ntn5. (ine!vcing demolition}. o. if jlng!e pnase projec:: Antic;oated oeriod 7. If ;TlUltl-pnased: a. Tocai number or pnases anticipated ~ (numoerl. iqqlo 2..=\ '/ear. (inciuding demoiiclonJ. '{ear. b. Anticipated date or commencement :::hase 1 4{\ O\N monen c. Approximate comple,::ion date of final phase (V\n,', ).nJ \month d. [s phase i func:ionaily de:Jendent on subsequent .:Jhas~5? eYes ;sAo eNo 3. INiil blast::ng occur during construc:ion? C:Yes 9. ,~umoer or jobs g:~n,erated: curing construc::cn .'lumcer or jobs e!imlnateC bv chis oraiec: V"'tOr'\ e ( 0 J.r~c:r :::rOle':: is ccmcie~e ~ 10. 1 ~. INii! oroje-:: ieCUlre relocation or any projec:s or fJctiitles~ .=Yes ,~ If Ifes. '?xpiJ.in 12. is surrace (iQuid wasee disposal involved? eYes ,~ d. if yes. indicJ.ce tvpe or waSi:e [sewage. ;nduseriaL e~c.} Jnc amount o. ,'\Jame or wacer ':ladv (nto wilich :ff!uenc ,.....dl oe Jisc.-:ar~~d ~o 1 J. Is suosurrace liauid waSl:e disposai invoive'J'? ,-v~<: - ,...~ T'lpe 1..:. "ViII 5UrrJCe area or an existing: wa::er bocy !nc:ea~e or ce':rcJ.se :JY ,:JrcoosaJ? E:<nialn ='-(es ~o :Ji...H~? =':~s ~o 15. IS projec: .or anY ;:lori:1on or prolec: iocJtee :n J. 100 ':,e.ar flood I, "Nill :he or-arec: g:~ne!'Jce solid 'Nasce? ,1. I f yes. what is the amount per month o. If yes. will an ~xisting solid waste rac:iity :,e used? C::Yes ~o if). - tons DYes !~ c. if yes. give name lac JtTtH'l d. 'NiiI JOY wastes not go lnw a sewJ.!J~ diSQosal )vs~em or into J SJmtJ.r'l lJoofdl? e. If Yes. explain =Yes :~ 17. 'Nill the proiec~ involve the disposal or solid waste? a. If yes. whac is the Jntfcipaccd ;ate or disposal? o. jf yes. what ;s the JtlCicip<.1(cd sice !ire? C2Yes ~ tons/mooth. i 8. 'Nill project use herbicides or pesticides? eYes '/f~;1(S. ~) .~ 19. 'Nill prOle':: routineiy produce odors (more ~h.ln Qrli' hour flt~r GJ.Y)' :=Ycs 20. 'Nill ;;rolc-:: orociuce one!'J::in(~ IlOlse (':(ceedilll: the iuc.1! ,1Il1bient nOI':ie il:'/t.:is? -" '''''''; , (~-; ~ ,. 'Niil prOlec: result :n cW inc;~..l~l.: :n !~n"'~'1 u"d eYes ~t1 It '!CS , lodicJtt: t'lpe~s) 23. :f ','Ia(c:~ :il.:ociv :~ from "...,.;:i',. 'flliic:.il' rJU~~;llll~ CJ:J,lLl(', ioc.:.i ,1111ic:pJt<,:-:i '.'"l(e:" U5a;,;t~ per ':l;W _\ ~ ;;~il()n...icia'.J :..;,iirllf1'Simll:~:ce. "' 2.: Docs ;Jro!cc: :nvo!'.'e ~()c,;.j, St,:tC or II'derJI :unciirH:' If y~s, L':-:::lIJm ....... ::'(f:::S ~() " ',' C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does orooosed action involve a planning. or z.oning decision? If Yes. indicate decision required: uzomng .imendmenc Ozonlng variance o neo.'Yirevision of master plan Cicy, Town. ',.ii.l~e: 30.Hd . ,1" City. lown. Viila~e P!~:nnlng Saara "\.... City, :own ::::::-:ing 3c.:.rc (:('1. C'.Juntv :-ie.J.ith O~oart:me~c ether l.oc.J.J Agencies o ther ~egion,Ji .-\ge!lc:es SColte Agenc:es federal Ag~!1cies ~'" C:i'iC eYes ,~c '=Y:?s IT?< 0 ~es CNa Cy~s ~o eYes ,~ DYes ~ eYes ~ 2. 'Nhat is :he 2:onin~ c!assifiCJ.tion(sloi :he Site? CreSQurce Type Dote ~C5"W. ~ '5'-1-~<1~ IN "" t,d ld::.e. --b - I/W>',. ., ~crt"~ ~ eNo CsoeciaJ 'Jse oerm't Csubcivision ~ pian "ltL~ management plan Cacher \ I~ ~~ L:C J. \VhJ.t is :he maximum ooten .1i development or the site if de'leiooed <15 ::erm:r:ea ~y ::-:e presenc zoning? . z.. CA c...\o-C 'Nhac is :he proposed ::oning Of ~he site? (~~ 11 V- r..1 ("'l 0 L~..zJ7 5. \VhilC:S che ma.Xlmum pocencrai development Of ~he site If dC'/elocea as pe!'m1c:eG JY :::.e ,Jrooosed z.oning? (5 ~he proposed Jc~ion consisce!'\e wich the recommended uses in adopcee iocal iand use:ians? ( 6. I. 3. - 9. ~ =,'. 'NOw 'tlore~'~~(~ 7~~~nsQd{~~us~r~(;c~ Is ,:ne proposed ac::on compacible ,...Jeh adioininS/5urrounding (.;no :.JseS ',Vle;',n a ;..~ miie? ~s =''.:'_ =' lo~ L'M'~ sa . b&~.. If ~he proridsea JCi:ion is the subdivision or I<<nd. hOW\ many lots Jre proposed? a. 'Nh<le is the minimum lot size proposed? _ y~ () ~ eYes ~: ,I. 10. Will proposed Jc:ion require any auchoriZleion(s) ior the formation or~~'~e!'" or water C:S~i"'iC:5? community provided se!"vic;:s (rec:eacicn, education, ::Jolie2 ',viii the proposed ac:ion c:eJ.te ~ demand ror any fire procce:lon)? DYes ~o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient co handle projc'crcd demand? eVes =No eYes ~c i 2. 'Niil the proposed action result in the ge!lcr~1tion or tr;:J,rfic signrfiC:1nc!v Jbove ;:Jresenc !e'lels? D. Inform<ltional Oet<lils a. If 'les, is the c:<isting road network Jdcquatc to hJ.odlc the ,1dditional :r:1rrid C!Yes ONe "tt.1e;, ,1rlV additIonal inform.loon JS ITl.J.V be needed to c!..riiy 'lour prop.:c::. If ~he!'e ;,n..: or may be J,n... ::.cve!'$c imp.lC:S assoc:.:Hed WIth your propo".li. pl(~;ISe discuss 5uc..:h imp.lctS 2Iod tile rnCJsures which .IOU propose to rnlc:g:ac~ C.- Jvoid them. E. VerifiC:1 tion r ,,:cndy thac the ( '-- 5ign,l(wrc if the .lc~i()f1 is in Ihl' ~ ',...ith thi-s ~sscssment. -... i"", oi "1'/,n()\V'",,"'~. . =..'C -J-l..;;}Lllq ~ T;tlc ~s..u1D~ l' ~. rc J ,f.llc J~!.:nc'(, cll111plc:e the CV.l'.ilJi ':"5scss:me~{ .'"orm hcinr~ :1roceeding .~ -____...._-,- 1'-'" M'-'T---;;;;r-MI'~L.I 11';0;;,-'-" 1T..---._'."............__ R\.:sponsihdit'l oj l~.Jd ..\g'.::rtC" . Gener.J1 lnrorm.Jtion (Re.1d (.J.,.V) - .. . in ::ompie~:n-.s :;-:e .-arm :~e ,"e'lIeWe:- should be :$,..!.r.:cd ':ly :.i"':e qL:cs~;on: H.1ve mv (C~COn5e5 ana dco:e:-mrr:~rions :e~ reJ.son.1ole? The reviewer :s nOt ::<oeced :0 be In expert: '~!1Vlrar:mc:!t:JJ J.i1J.lv'5i:. -, Icencrvtng :nJ.t In impac: wdl be pOtentiallv !arg,=, (column 2) dO~:i noe me;:;n ~h,i.i: " ;s J.iso .1p.-::essJ.rdv signiiic:tr.t. ,."nv _arge impac: iTlUS':: ~e evaluated in PART 3 ~o c.!co:ermine signlfrC.::.r:ce. IdertClf'/lng In ::-:1paci: in COic..H~:-: 2. Sir.'::: a.sks :hat It Je rocked at run::-:er. . The E;':.Jmples orovided are :0 .3.ssis'i: the re.lle.......er bv showing cvpes or imo.1c:s JnG .....r.ere.!er .::ossibie .:he :;;res.~aic : magr.:wce :.hac \Yould c:igge:" a resoOnse in ~olumn 2. The e:-CJmpies J.re generally JpclicJ.cie :hroughouc ~:-:e 5(:l~e 1r' for ;iicst Situations. Sue. rer a.nv specific projec: Or sice ocher examcies Jndior lower :nre5hoids may ce apcroQria:. for a ?otenciai Large !mpac: resconse. thus ."equirin~ ~'1aJuc1cion in Part 3. The impac:s or each pro;ec:. on each sice. in :-ac:, ~oCJjicv. wdl "arv. T;'e:-erore. me eXJ.mnies a.re iilus;:iaClve ar.; have bee!"! Offered as g'.lidance. They do noc ConS'i:!tuee an exhaustive !iSt Dr imoac:s and :hresncids co answer e3C1 qt.:e5;:ici The number or ~:<ampies per question does not Indicate ;:he impOrtance ()f each aueS'Clon. . In identifying impac::s. consicer long term, short ~erm and cumlacive erfe-:::s. Instruc-:ions (Read careful Iv) 3. ..l.,nswer each or the i9 queSi:lons in P,'\RT 2. AnSwp.r Yes Ii :here ',viii ~e Jnv (mOilC:. ~. .\1.i1vce answers should :,e considered as Yes answers. c. If Jnswehn-.s Yes to a cuestion ~hen check the Joorcpn,Jce ~ox (coiumn 1 or 21 to :nc:cace ::-:e pocenc:ai 5ize or ::-:~ impClC:. (f impac: :hresnoid eouajs or exceeds a.ny ~xamole ornvlded. c.~e-::k column 2. 1 f ,mo.::.c~ wiil oc:;.;r buc :hre5nelc is [ower ~;,an ~xam9ie. c::eck coiumn 1. d. :f "e'newer has doubt about :iIZ'::! or ,:he imoac: chen C::inslde:- :he rmcJ.c: a.s pccent:adv :arse and prcce~c :0 ?.l,.R.T ~ ~. If d ~oeenciaily iarge imoac: c::ed~eC: in COlumn 2 can be mln~ated ::'1 C;'Jn~e(sl in ~he ororec::o c1 smail ~o .iiccer1~:: imoac. also c:-:e-::k che Yes :ox :n coiumn 3. A L~O response indic.:ces ::-:J.c 5uch a .-eCUClon is nOt ::Joss1ole. i;i:~ mU5~ ::e e:'(oialnea in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND \Viil ::-:e proposed dc:ion resuit in J pnvsicJJ c;,an~e ~a ch.c prO!~t:.ct:5 '511}e ? '-"I() M::- i j :-' -01 - . :) E':::.Jmoics ;:hJ.c would apoI'( co column 2 . Any constiuction on slopes or 1 S % or greater, (15 ,:coc iise ;:Ier 100 foot or leng~h). or where the general slopes in che ::Jroie-::t a.rea e.'(ce-ec 10%. . Cons~ruc:ion on land where :he depth ~o the wa(er ~able is ress than 3 feet. . Construc:ion or paved parking area ror 1,000 or more vehIcleS". . Construction on land 'Nnere bedroc:< is e:-cposed or generally WIthin J feet of e:(i5~jng ground surface. . Construction chat will continue ror more tha.n '1car or invoi'.'c Olore than onc ph.:Ise or stage. . ExcuvtJrlon for rrllning purposes ~h.J.t ',"'"OlJid remove more th,l11 i .'JOO tons or :1<lwrJ.l m<ltCriai (i.e., icck or SOli) per Y(~~lr. ConstructIon or ~;(pilnsiol1 or a ."i.l111C<lrV I.illdfill. ConSLrt.:c:lOn :n J dcsi~n<li:cd ,:!oodway Other ;rnn.:cs 2 ',Vill : :-:~~(~ :It.: In (.t fee: ~.' ,:he )i(e~ ~i_...'., c!iU5. (jur.C$. ..1.... '..,;:...H.ie (;r ~~I1USU..: I.:~I': :':7':1<; i\:tHHi er: ~~010L.:~CJ.J ...v!tTl..H:Oll.... t.,'tc.!L.:'iC """:YSS Soec:r,c :,1rHl 'arm:5: ...... G 1 Sma!l to :"loce~a[e Imoacr 2 .=c{:ntiaJ Lar~e imp~cr ~ -; - -':'.. ~ '- '- [1 ,- ~ U " ~ ,~ '- ;V"" c r L ,- ~ .~ I 3 Can lrTICac: 3= Mitigat=c Sy I PrOjee: C:-:anGe CJy~s )~.'Jo i!?Yes :--.,;010 i\::1 e s eNo CJYes :~No ~Yes ~;"lo rYes C:,'lo L":'es "'_.'10 eYes L>.:o ,- L:Y~s -..,;.'10 .:_ y~s _>..a {" iMPAceN WAT,,::! J. \Viii oroccsec -lc:ion ..life..:: ,Joy water body de5i~!1iHed JS .:Jroceccec? (!;ncer ,..lo..n::c!e:i is. 2":'. 25 or :he =;'l'J'lronme!1cai Con'5er'/Jc!9n L;lW. ~c:...) _ . '0-:0 ='(:=5 E;:.1mpies :hat .....auld aopiv :0 cOlur.,n 2 Oe'le!oca::ie a.rea of site contains a oro(e{;~ed water body. Ored~ing :l.ore .:han iOO clcic yards of maceriai from c:',1nne! or a procec:ed 5i:re.1m, . ::.'t::ension or 'Jcilicy distMbution racdicies through a orocec:ed water body. . Constiuc:icn in a designated freshwater or tidal 'N/~dand. .. Other imoac:s: 4. 'Nill procosed action affect anY non-protec:ed axistina ~ew body of water? ~O' wYE5 E:t.J.mples :hat ...youtd applv to column 2 . A iO% inc;ease or decease in the'surface area or any ::cdv of wacer or more than a 10 aGe inc:ease or decrease. . Const,uc::on or a bedv or w'ater ::nat exce~ds 10 ac:"es or surface are.3.. . Other imqd.c:s: ( 5. Will ?rocosea Action arrec: surface or grounc'.va~er Quality or :uaneley'> CNO E':.1mpies :::i1de wouid acpiv co COlumn 2 . P~oposed Acion wiil require a disc;,arg~ permit. Procosed ,~c:ion requires use oc a source or water that does noe nave appro'lai to serve proposed (projec~l ac:;co. ,~, ?rocosed ,\.c:ion :"equires water supply from 'Neils wleh greaeer thJ.n ..:.5 gailons per minute ;Jumplns capacity. . C'JnStructlOp; or ooeratJon (~usins; any contamInation or -3 watcr SUPPlY system. . Prooosed Action will ad'lefs~iy aCTec~ grounowace!" . Liquid effluent will be conve'.l~J aif che site to rJ.CliiCles whic:, presencJy do not exist 'Jr have inadecuace capacity. . Proposed ,\cion would use water in excess or 10.000 gallons per day. . Proposed Ac:ion will likclv cause sdtation or ocher discharge. into <In existing body or w,tl(t:r to th~ ext('flt that there wtil be In obVIOUS I.,isual contrast to natural conditions. . Proposed Action ""iit require the Si:or;:H.:~ oi pe~rolcull1 or dll:mic~j products greater thc1n 1,100 gallol1s. . Pronosed ,\cion 'Niil allow residenClal llSCS in ,lrens widlOUt "N,lter and/or sewer services. . ?7opo'5cd ..\cion Joca:es commc.n-:ial Jlldior indllSmJi ;J'ii~S Wille:' m,1V re!1utre new ,Jr~:o:nanSlOn oj e~f::;w~~ W,l"lte ::"("'.:lrn~"t ,jodier ..tor<lI::''': rJcdicics. . Other imo.!c:s: ( \.... "Nill ;J,rOCJose-:' .jc.;tion .du.:r ::ir.llll":~(, rlow .ir :JJt!,,'(!~s/Gr 'N,1ter ~unoif? ~C t.~':lMpll's ::"':Jt ','/ouic Jopiv ,:0 caiumn ~ ?~cr.o'5ed Ac..;::on wouid ::1<1ng'.;' dnod '....,H.:-r flow'i. 6 ,untic:..: ........ i I 1 i."allte I derate I [meae: i I I I I I I I I , I ~ , ~ , , ,- ~ ~ L P~tential Large ~mpac: 2 3 Can im::2.c: ::2 l'vlitigarec 3~1 I ~"oiar. C~-n-- I. ....~ ,.ct ''::1= ~ '- LYes ~.'Ic r- L...;'(~s I=.'~O L- L ~'(es i-No L ! Yes :_I~O - LYes ~No ,- L- ~ ,- r: ;- i i r: I '_'(es i C-;Yes ! =Yes I I i i I I I I I I I I I I ~=.'ic ~;"IO ,-:--Jo ~'(e5 ; .:'Jc [:Y:s _i'!C " i,-:'(~:) :_>Jc i_Y~s .""';.'10 ; 1'(~5 Li'lO '-;Yes L....;>~O 1-; Yes i_.'JO j ;Yes r:No :iYC:i !_~o eYes i~No :-...:Yt.:s '_:-:0 , "(L'S ~;,!o ~=~(.'s '-....;0 ..4 . ~ . P:-oposec ,":"C:lon :nav c.Juse 5uostanc:aJ 2roSlon. . ?;-occsed Ac:icn :5 incompaCloie ',vleh existIng: crJ.Jna::;e :Jclc~e::1s. . Prccosed ,..:..c:ion '.ViiI a.llow de'le!camenc in a desi~naced ilocc....'u'/ Ct~e; imcac:s: IMPACT ON AIR 7 'Niil proposed .1c::on affec'.: air quaiitv? !=NO 'V"rE5 EXJ.mpies {hac '.vauie apoiy to coiumn 2 . ?rocosed Ac:ion will induce 1,000 or more '1ehic~e trips in any given hour. ~on or . Proposed AC'::ion will result in the inc:neratlon or more than refuse =er hour. Emission race of :otal contaminants will exceed 5 ibs. per :-':our ar a heJc source ~roc:..:c:n~ more chan 10 million 8TU') ::Je: hour.' . Proposed J.c:ion wlil ailow an increase ~n the amount or [.lna commrcte-:= :0 incus;:ilai use. Proposed ~C:Jcn '.-vii] allow an inc:-e.3.se :n ~he ccnSlC'f or :nC~S':;:,J,i .ce'leioomenc 'NICntn ~.'(!sl:lng :nqus~nal areas. Other imcac:s: ~ IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 3. '.V. ili?roposed Ac:ion affe~;: J.ny threacenec or enc~.;~~'7J soe-.::es? y..G EJ.J,mples chat ..yould apply to caiumn 2 ~educ;:ion or-one or more ioecies listed on che ;'le'N '(ori.: <Jr ;-I..?Ce:-':1 ~ t ' . fisc. uSing the site. over or near site or round on :he Site_ . Removal or any porticn or a criticaj or significant wiidlire nJOitJ.L . Application or pesticide or herbicide more than twice J. ,/e.:.r. othe:- than for agriculturili purposes. ;-,.... - ._l::~ . Other imoact.s: g. Will Proposed Aerion s.ubstantially affect non-threaccllc,0r non.endanl;~red species? ~o eYES EJ..o1mples thac would apply to column 2 Proposed I\cticn would substantlJJfy intcrfere with '-'.flY :-esid0:1C or :'nlljracory fish. :ihcHfish or wildlife sceClcs. Proposed t\c:ion rcquues the remov,oJ or more !h,ln ~ n ,1C'CS or macure forest (over 100 years or ar;'!l or ache:, iocdlv ;mpU((,Jnc Ve;;~!.1tlon. IMPACT ON AGRICULTUf1AllANO IlESOUf1CES 10 \Viil :he :"JrCGoscd ;\C:1On Jifc~t J~!'!(\dfurJ.i :.H~d rt'.;;o~rccsl :'\if'IC :':Y[5 ('l.lnlpic'i ~l1d(....ouid -Jc;oiv:o C:1iUf":'"'::l 2 T:l{! ;)(acC<'I~(j J,C::Ol1 wouiu ;e'.'cr. GOS5 (I( !imlC 1C':25; ~o J~i:l'\lilur..~: i.1nd (inc!uc!i.:S cooi.lno. ~1.lvr;c!cis. ;las,un'. '1IC11"/J((i, Ofc;,.1,ci. ,.:~c.) -.... 8 1 ."'ail :0 cerate irr.::ac: 2 p,::>: ::i tiai ! ~.....~ --. -:,- :r;-:::ac: 3 ::an lm::ac: ,\.1iUgarec =y .=rO!2c: C~an<;= i I L_ '-, :_'(=s ,,- _, u '='(~s .---:y~s . . Yes _.".,jC __~c =.'-jo _y~s '-1~O ~ ~ 'f~s _:-~c - "5 '_;'-jc ;---:'(es ~=.'iC - :5 :_~o Of~5 _."0 '~ :=y~s '_:--~o - , I i , i i I I I i I I - I I ! !_y~s _No '-,~o I_y~s :---:':".~5 ;-.::'iQ ;-!Yes. '.....;010 L-..y.!S '~;"Jc '_'(>::!s :.....,;.-..:0 . r '\.. C:nSCiUC:lon JCIV:CV would e:o:cJ,vace or Gompac: ,:he 'iod ;Jrariie or agrrcwiCurai iand. . i":1e :Jrocosea Jc~ion wouid irre'/e:-slclv c.:;nve:"t mar~ :han iO aCjes or 3.gric:.dc~raJ land or. :f ;ocJted in an AgnC'..dtucal Distrlct. more chan 2.5 aces or Jgric'..licural land The .:::rocosea acr:ion would disrupt or ;;re'lenc :ns~aJlation or ut:ric:.:lturn! land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines. aude,: ditches. Hi":O crooping:j: or create a ;'leee for such measures (e.;. cause a farm field to drain poody due :0 inc:"e3.sed runoff) Other impac:s: r , '- IMPACT ON AESTHET1C RESOURCES /" 11. '.viII ::,rocosec action aifec: aes::.Mecic resources? ~NO eYES [If necessary. use ~he Visuai E.-.q: ,"',ddencum in SeGIOn 6ii.21. Acoendix 3.1 E;t~mpies ~hat "vQuid appiv :0 COlumn .2 ?:-cposed land lJSe5. or oroie-:: c:.:)mcanencs oevlouslv Glriere!1C rrom or in :'iharo contrast :0 C:'J(rem: ;urrounding iand use oac:e!'ns. w'le~her man.made or naturaL ?:-ocosed land uses. or ~ro!ec: ..:omcone!'1(S Vlslbie co users or aesthe~jc tesources which wdl :iiminate or 5i~niric.J.ndv (educ~ :he:r ;:!1!ovme!'1C or the J.esthe~ic Guaiicies or that resourC2. Prolec: components that wiil ,-esuit :n ;:he :!iminacion or 5igmficJ.nc .ic:c~nln~ of j(:erllc views i:r:own :0 be imporc~nc :0 ,:he JreJ.. ether' impJc:s: ,. 1/liPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. INill P:'ooosed Action impact lny site or struc:LLre or historic. pre- historic or paleontological importance? Vt<fo DYES E::.:1mples chat would aopiy to column 1 . Pmposed ,.\ction occurring whoily or partially within or suostontiaJlv contiguous co any facility or site listed on the St;Hc or ,'Jaejonal Register or historic pielces. . Any impelct to an archaeologicai site or fossd bed !oc;:xtcd ','vithin the project sice. P:,oposed ..\(tion will occur in drchJ.cO!Ol;lC.JJ SiteS on the ,'-+YS Othcr imn.1Cts: ,~n area designated Siee Inv(~f1torv JS senslClvl! ror ( "- IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATiON 13 \~/iil f'mposed Acion Jffe~: ~he qu.'iIlII('1 or qUJii('1 or .::'O\ring or future OIlL'n Sp.1CCS or ,ec;cJW1r1.Ji 8CJ~j(H~unJ[a'$) ::.~,In1nles :hJ~ .....uuieJ Jonl',' :0 :.')lumn ~tlfiO C:'(ES i~(~ ;JC,~,lnt!n( fo(rc!csure or .1 ;'ucure ,'I'r:rCJ.~l(J/l'll .:JpponU~ll('/ .-\ !H.lror ;l'(1UCIQIl of an l1r:e~ c,r:J.ce rllptJr:;I1{ .:c :~1l: C:Jnanunl('( ether :mr.::c:s: ., 9 1 2 I ~ " 1:11 to ?'Jtenr:al , Can Imcac! Be , I IV derate Lares I Mitigated 3y imoac~ Imoac: I Projec~ C:iar.ge I .- ~Yes i=.'lo , . t Yes r;'Jo , - (rYes L...:No ,- CJYes nNO - ! 'Yes 1-': j~ 0 ; 'Yes :- >~c =VeS. :......:~c eYes j~Nc ~ '.. CJ ~ DYes eNo ~ D L.; eVes DNa D CJ CJYes !....it-Ie ,- U eYes ~No '- :- Y~5 I Yes !=.'Jo :_."-..Jo !-;,"'lO I~ :.- Y ~5 ... IMPACT C.RANS;:ORTXIION 1~ I,Viii :r.ere ~e an ~~f~c:~o e:(is~ing :~anspor~a:::on SVS~:::-:Sl .=>;0 v, E.':.J.moles thai: would aopiy to column :2 ; Aleeraocn or present patterns or movement or ;Jp.ooJ'e .;;r:dior gor':CS I 'I I" I . P.ocose'J -\C:l0n .vII resu t In major ~iarllC JrOOlcrns 1 Other ;TPacC-' _ ~ ~ LY1C\-CO.~ i tru~ - ~7.h "ci CUt4 vJ{ Ol" I 'AC7 ON ~g----. ! lS I.,Viil orooosed aC:lon arrec: che communlcv's SourC2S or fue!:::" ! energy sueolv? =:'-:0 0 I E~.J.mples that 'Nouid apoiy to column 2 I . Prooosed ActIon will cause a greater than 5% inc:e3se in the use'Jr any form ot energy in the municipal icy. . P:-oposed Action wlil require the creation or extension of an ener:!'1 tr~nsmisSlon or supplv SYstem to serve more chan 50 sm~ie or twO ramli'./ re5icenc~s Or co serve a malor commerclaJ or tnousi:r1<l1 :jSe. - ....' _SiT1~'1 :0 I .'vice::a:: 1 imcac: i I I - I .v/I I I , I i i I I I , i I ,- ~= , ~ I , I ! p~ ten ~ial !m;:ac: 2 ~E.rce ,- e...; ,- i i I i I i I i , I , i I Wi I , i i c '- L .~ 3 Can Imoact _ iVlitigai:2d By Praiee: Cllan<; i-lYes ~-Yes """":'(::5 ~_:'-I' ;- i'4(~ ;-;'k I I I ! the ~oc:'j i I ;::U~\:05 ~l~ (V\ I" a ther impac~s: , 16. 'Niil :here ~e obiec::onabJe odors. ,"1oise. or the ?:"Oposed Ac::ion? . E;;',Jrnpies chat would appiy ~o coiumn .2 or 'Iloratlon JS J. (e5L.:i~ =.';0 'V 8Iasi:in:s within 1 ,500 fe~~ or a ~ac:ii(y. nosOlcilJ. sc~ooi or Qc;-:e~ senSlC!':e i . Odors will occur routtnc!y (more ~han one hour iJe~ Oil'l). ?:-or)osed /:"ction will produce oper;),<::ng noise:: exceo:.Jir:g ambient 'lqise levelS for noise outside or 5w...c::.;res. P;-oposec ;\ction ..viii remove n.H.urai :,arners :hac noise sc:e~n. . Other 0... \ HEALTH ~ 17. Will Proposed "ction <life':! public health and safet~ ~O . ~o eVES Ex~mplc' that would apply to column 2 Proposed :\ction mJ.Y cause a risk or explosion Of re!C35e or :,a.l.:;,rCOU5 sub'SrJ.nc~s (i.e. oil. pesticides. chemicals. r~diation. ~!C.) in the ~~venc or acciocnc or upset conditions. or there may be a chronic low :e'Jc! discharge or emission. P~ono5ed Action may result in chc burial or "h.:lIarcous W,i.SCCS" in dnv form (i.e.~oxic. poisonous. hiL;illy reJC:lve, r.,oiC.:iC,lve. Irnt:..unl~. iniec~lous. !:tc.} Storage r.l(ilities for one rTltiJicn or l1"lorf~~Jilurls or [iqlJlrled 1l.1(ur.-.: ~JS or ori'wr ifamw.::.ole liqUids. PrC'HlO'icd .1GIQn :11.1'1 (C':l~dt :n the 2:-:C.;Vc'(JOrl (J( other :::<;,llrhJnc...: '.Vl(lHn 2.'J(J() ~eet or J 5ltP. use':! ~or :hc ,n"ocSJi [Ji iOjl(j ~r ~;I/.\rdcl.:~ '.vd';)te. Ot!~I'r ImCl.:C:S: '- 10 I I /=Ye, I I I I I I , , I I I I I ! eNc '=Yes I 'Nc i--:Yes CI'4C ! Yes eNC :......: Yes ~t'Jc :~Ye5 C1'J.,,; ~Yes Ci"-Jo ~, r\'-lo DYes ONe CJYes eNO i :Yl.'S '--.,;,'JO ='(\":5 L,'llJ ='((~S ! -:'J1) 18. .r \. IMPACT ON GRAH AND CHARACT",,, OF COMMUNITY OR NE!GHBORHOOD 'Nil! proposed uc:ion ,lifec:: the char<1cter or che ~.'C:sc:n~ ~mm~~c~~ . Q.<o_ . ,) E;:amples that would <.10piy co column 2 . The ~ermanenc POculclClon or ~he c:ty. town or vlilJ.ge in wnich :he prOJect is located is likely ::0 grow ~v more than 5%. . The mUOIcipal budg~~ ror cacit;]! ~xpe:1dicures 'Jr operacing 5erVIC~s wiil increase by more chan 5% per year as a result or this prOlect. . Prooosed ac:ion wiil conflict wIth officially <ldooced ;:llans or goals. . Proposed ac::ion wiiI cause a change in the densiev or land use. . Proposed Action will re~jace or eiimin,Jce e:dsring facilities. 5::iuc:urcs or areas or histone importance to the communlCY. Development wiil create a demand ror additional communicv services (e.g. schools. police and fire. etc.; . Prooosed Action '.viil see an imoortant pre-:~dene for fun~re proiecrs. Proposed Ac:ion will create or -:!!iminace emplovment. Other impac:s: '~1 I'all ~o I ;"1oderau~ I Impac: 2 .=:Jtr:ntia! '..arge :moac: I Can Im~ac: 5e I Mitigatec 5y Proiect C:--:ance !. - c nYes :-;-..10 I.......:,~O L,'Jo 1-: No C:'la rNO C:'1o L..!Nc ~;'1o 19 r: ~ UYes " '-' ,- ~Yes L.; Yes L;Yes c c i-.-! c ,- L..;Yes ~ '-' eYes LYes "---:Yes L ~ :-: Is there. or is there likelY m be. public COntroversy ~!ac~j .:0 ;Jocerwai adverse environment:.! :mcacr.s< ~C _ Y::5 ...- 1 "- If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact wr If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 I, Part 3-EVALUATJON OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Respon~jbijity or Le.:td Agency Part 3 must b(! prep.Jreu if one Or more impac~(s) is considered to be pot~iitr,Jlly Large. even if the impJ.ct(.s; may be mifigated. Instructions Discuss the following: for each imp.)c! identified in Coiumn .2 or rart 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (it Jpplic.JbieJ how the impact could be micigated or i'edllC~d to .1 smail to modL'1'.:lCe imn~1C1: by project ch.:1nge(s,. 3. !3<J,scd on the information Jyail.lbie. decide if it is re.i1Son.101~ to conclucJe lh.lt thiS Ilnpac: is impurt.1nt. To answer the question or importance. conSider: . The probability or the :rnpac: occ:Jrrin,r.: . The duration ot the imn.let Its Irrc'Icrsihility. Indudil11~ permanently IOH w'ourc'", or '/,llm: 'Nl1cther the imn.1c: CJ.tl ur will be corlCroiled . The region.1J con"pqucnn: oi tflt: imp.1ct Its poccnti;i/ divf~f1:cnca irom IOCll ne~'d~ ':'.1<.! '.:0..15 \Nht:!hcr known nhjec:ton'i :0 till' ;->rr.lft'C ,'CLltL. :0 :hl'" l/np,iet. ( "- (C.Jntlflue Oil JtCJciltllentsj " .A ~..:.i":.;; i:'571_;< ,-' - ...... C ~ i ..::. ~ ....." ...:...: V~... .6..ppendix g E:1'Jircil:nental QU<Jlit.e'/iew 'If .... .. 'j'-"-' :-~ .l~ wel ,'" .,.. '" _ ,.,~.<::l"'''''11'''''''''\1 1. .'~ U '\- " .l, ........:. .....,. .1 ,.-^~ j- ""'" r- ~.J. ....~ r ~ "' SEGR This ~'or:7'l may be '...!3ed to pro'Jide additionGi "r.for:-:;~t:cn :e~at!ng to G.ues~icn ! 1 of Par-.: 2 of ~he ,=ui/ E.:".F'. (70 be O:-:Jmp!e':ed by L:.=;d ,Age!"".c::) Distance 8etwee;n Projec: and Resoure!: (in l'Iiles) Q. :.I..~ i/.:..!/: 1/:.3 J', 5;- - 0 e" G , 0 ,t?"" i , I I I i 2. fs the '/isibility oi the proje-:: ;,{;:Jsonili? (Le.. ~;creer1c~ by ~urr:r:;er foliage. but '/i::ibte dUling ocher ! seasonsi . / ~ s <;cl::L WI \I be.. ~ <;PC'" nrl ~ st::tJ.-- "'(os t2"'ia vltWl ~ ~~ ~ / ~~",.{"..d~ 3.\(0 anv cor 'h('~""'~~~~Gu(*F"~~"~i(~ during "'.'Iilic;, :!~:.: P~lt/ ".l,,'di !n~ 'n~d;[c! .... I !=Yes I~C Visibiiity 1. Wouid the ~roiect be '/isibie from: A parcel or land which is dedicated to ana avaiiabie to the public for the use. enjoyment and ao!'re-::<Jcicn of naturai or man-made scenic qualities? . i~n overiook or pare':!! of land dedicated to :Jubiic observation. enjoyment and d9predation or natural or rr.~n.made scenic qualities? ,.;. site or Si:iUC'::Jre iisred on the Naclonai or. S~a~e Re~isl:ers or riisl:oric Places? State Parks? The State :=oresi.: ?resef'/e? l~ationai \.Viidlife Refuges and state game refuges? :'tationai l'!aturai L.Jndmarks and other oLHsi.:znciing natural features? r \.. . i'taticnal Park Se~ice (ands! Rivers cesignaced as National or Scare Wiid. .sce~!c or Recreationai? 1,A.ny trans9ort<Jtion c~rridor of hi~h ~xposure. suc:--- as part or the !ntersl:nte System. or /-\mtr<Ji<? . A governmerHaJly estabiished or designated :nrerstate or inter--:ounty foot traiL or one formaify proposed fer esrabiishment or designation? L Ii ~ -':"- . A site. area. lake. reservoir or highway dcsignat~d as I- i.....; n scenic? . l'Iunicipal park. or designated aDen space? r: [} U 0 . County road? i-.J ;7 d n o . State? c . Local road? z o .. ~ '--:-: , , - v/ ,/ - I-t.:"'" V .~ u if ,pi '- d d g' '- G u c '- .~ . DESC:RIPT,ON OF f.-SlING VISUAL ENVIROi'!i'~ENT . ""', F:-om e3.c~ item \.: _:,ed in question t. :::~ed': ,:hcse '.'Inic:. . ne:aily cesc:"loe t;-:e surrouncing environme~L Essenciuily uncie'leio;Jed Forested Agr:c'.litural Suburban residential [naustrial Commercial ,- Within . 1 ;nil~ ~ V l..J I ! "l/~ miie - ~ IV ~ ~ ,-, L...! Urban River. Lake. Pond Cliffs. Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly t'v1.ountainous Other NOTE~ add ~(t~c;;ments as :1eeded v D"" I i ~ I , f\:Y , , '-' I i ~ n ~ II '--- ,- II '--- ~ L.....: ,- , ' 5. ,-\re there '1isuaily ~,imv-ar projects wi,thin: "'1/2 mile I~{es L No -1 miies ~es Lii'~o ~y.!s -3 miies 0res UI~O I Distance from projec: site are provided :cr assjs~ance. Substitute ocher disi:CJnce:s a~ appr~9ri(Jce.! -2 miies : It'!o EX?OSURE 250 5. The annual numoer or 'hewers likely to obsc:fVe the propcsed ;Jrc Jeo:: is NOTE; When user data is unavaiiable or: unknown. use best e:stimate. ...~.... CONTEXT 7. Tne situation or activity tn which the: '/iewers are engaged 'Nnile viewing the proposed action is WeekJy ~ FREG.UENCY Holidaysl Weekends o o Seasonally o o Activity Travel to and from work' Involved in reo:reational <Jctivilics Routine tr:Jve! by re~idents At <l residence At '.vorksite Other Daily o o o o ii , , ri o i....J 0 i~ ~ U :J;?"" I ' u r: , " L.! o o o 2 --- ; ~ '''' . , Submission Without a Cover Letter ~ f~ ~ Sender: Pe.c.onlc.. SlJ.,v'vtJ'1or5 Date: 112f~ Iq ~ Subject: N \- R(.SOLlrc.e.s, Jmc.. . SCTM#: ~'>_ 3 -I.{. ~ .' , Comments: 8 k~ ma...pS l1 <.; i k... P Ia (\S - ~ ~ - - i i - i i . . 0; I . . I \ffif:~~ L-rouTtiiJLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD f . . t . I ! Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: R let. Pri reA PI Date: 7/L~I'1/P Nt: Re-sou.fce:s, ~c.. cJ.ee((. lJo.. ~ Subject: SCTM#: ~~-3-tf,G, Comments: _ 1> /50 t11pJ Fe.e..... -~~, - du...tJ.- ~ 1; ill~@~aw~/01 ,'III JUl 2 6 '996 ;I u II "JI S'11'TN -_...........J I l J, ,ULD revm PLANNING BOARD - . . . --- ___I / tJoo -. ~s=_~=:fKS-_ ______~_n _____~__n _____ ___ ______ :Jdzt./ttif__~Lf.I.&2__ __.__. ....______n_____________u______ . ~~,)L2C2.c:?~--)dp-UIfeL--.6H--, -------- (' r..ed:dJ-(f-It..t"-;.J2.~ :::-_j/2._3-5-~ -----------.. ----,~--_...._-_.__._._--~------'----"---- /a/ci _ i"3. - 3' - ~2 ____________..________ :6 ~~-L.<--------= S'.LL4'2f;5;g/,/:::'_//0/_____ u ..--- - cZ .__n____L CZ6o..:-.ZJ'--::Y--~ ________ .:Dccs&'s)./ . .__ _n l.6..~aAc? 4'/'i!"/~d-:pr ________ .I.4-Y-C-~/.-._jJ y. //9f/r... / - 1/. ,/ tJ()n - Z 3' - Y _-:_.3.~___.. . , &lZb_shL__~~>>-(':---L-6~Ld~,tJ~ ~ &,A:--LQ27 ~ c.rlc7-'"'..e.~Y ) /;;30- -~ R 'c,,:i ~!i.'-\~T':-\1 ____ in LI I') : " :', ls-"j::;\I_ l"7 ? '7 ./ ~ "ii'l s: /0(/0 -;/.2 - <.2....._~L__ -------- --- .-- lit 2 6 1096- . ; ~J1!-- , . Vl1 i ""..- . &v--I -_6}.~,.aLY~ ,~..rdfil-------- - n_ . ~UIJ!HiJID1GVnF.J -l.. ~ ___n___~E;;~ p~_y:76CJ-(;:'Oy k.#-.- _ PLP~~~~~~~____ .J .. C~_-(_~~~n: _ }[9_3~__=_=~-_---~-:-_: I:L!aoQ--:_ t'S-: a? - /~ ~-f'.;z./!._ c2LLl2d~f-&-~A:.-g~---------.-~ -----.- -------- __un ___CZi:L~_.Ld_44(.~#~-.rO#.J /7:;1_:2_.___ n - - ! 7. L0r2~_?3 ~.~~L.:J__L___~7cfl.P6~ _m____~____._ "2 td;.d)~~~cfY:a..[,fOC /#:'~~__n~___ __un ___u__ /~,60?"~ d--L _._ -- n_ (L~O-~ _/J--~L~~ ---------- --- ------------ --- _.~ ~,-~_._---_._-------------.~~-_._._--.._---- -_.~-~~-_._-_._----_._------'-----,. --- . . _/ '1'Sl/ t-"*~C1) lillo, T AX MAP tiEs'f/iA nON 0;,., jooo ",083.00 0,..03.00 LOIlJ}: 004.006 . . ::,-.. lI'I .. Nm" 8((12- _ &rg.tin a\'lc.l Sale Deed, wilh CO"tt':lIlnl ~~J.im.t Gt'iLlJ1N'~ !t(lt -ITldiv;d\l31 Of COIp<.\talion. (single ,\>~I) CONSULT VOUR LAWVER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT -- nlls INSTRUMENT SllOUlD BE USED BV LAWYERS ONlV, ._--~-_._--_.__._--- 27th . day of March . ninete<n hundrtd and ninety-six THIS INDENTURE, made Ihe UITWEEN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY NATIONAL SANK. . national banking corporation having its principal office at 6 West Second Street. Rivechead. New York 11901 party of the (irst part, alld -~,..:..~......---.-.... '. - - . corporation having its Br~dgehampton. New York NORTH FORK RESOURCES INC.. a New York principal office at 52 Foster Avenue. 11932 ~\ I party of the second part, wrtNESsETH, that the party of the first part, ill cOllSld.13tion of Tell Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part. does hereby ~rant and release unto tbe party of the second part, the beirs or successors and assigns of the pany of the second pan forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected. situate, Iyin~ and being io<ltle at Cutchogue, in th9 Town of Southo1d, County of Suffolk and Stat~ of New York. ~ir~ more ~~rticular1y bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the corner: formed by the intersection of the southerly side of Oregon Road and the westerly side of Cox's Lane;, RUNNING THENCE South 59 degrees 55' 31" Fast. along the westerly sid<a of Cox's Lane 475.72 feet: RUNNING THENCE South 30 RUNNING THENCE North 59 ly side of Oregon Road: degrees degrees 12' 50" West, 559.78 513.96 feet to a point on the sou thec- feet: 55' 31" West, .i. . -'--~--- ..---.---"------........- RUNNING THENCE along the SOlltherly side of Oregon Road the following 2 courses and distances: 1. ) North 60 d"'~rees 49' 44" E,,~t. 90.38 feet: 2.) North 29 degrees 17' 16" East. 482.15 feet to the cocner, the point or place of BEGINNING. -.-,.....--.. . ....,...._-,.._~-.......,...',.-- BEING IIND INTENDED to be the same premises conveyed to the party of the first part by deed made by Katherine Z. Pope, as referee. dated October 24, 1993, and record- ed in the Office of the Suffolk COllnty Clerk on November 5. 1993 at Liber 11650 page 814. ill rn (Gj ~ n w [fu. ~~ 2~~- ~~~i,;r.~\?~f!:~,i~,,~,~~" ' . TodETHER with all right, title and interest. ,r any. <>fthe party of the fir<l part in andlo anl;-;i;eet~-and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines th<reof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the PaJ1y of the second pa, t, tbe heh s or succeSSors and assigns of the par1y of the s",,"Ond part forever, AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have betn encllmbered in allY way whalever, except as aforesaid, AND the patty of the first pan, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the nrst part will rf<'eive the consideration for this cOllveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideratioll as a trust fund to be applied nrst for the purpo" of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the paynlent of the cost of the improvement befm. using any part of tbe total of the '.me for any Olher purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as If It read "parties" whenever the s."se of this indenture so requireS. IN WITNFSS WHEREOF. the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PJ>.lsENCE OF, ......__..,.. u ..:.......'.:h..U 1\,1B.m"tt~NK ./ !.USANl'lifGERS1!1ffiN NOlary Publi~~A?~Of New Vorlc No 4739511~Jfolk County C!"7 COrOiTlI5Sio" EIl.'(lir~s n.pril 30. 19__., couNTY OR TOWN . 'I "':) ':> ~ '- STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF S50 O1Ilbe day of personally came 19 . before me o , "" ~ ~ to me known to be Ihe individual described in and who e"ecuted the foregoins instrument, and aCknowledged that executed the same. ,..1; :1:\ i STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK On the 27th day of March, 1996. before me personally came ROBERT T. ELLERKAMP to me known. who being by me duly swom, did depose and say thai heresidesalNo.4 Whit.e Birch Orive, Centereach, New York 11720 thai he is the vice "resident ~The Suffolk county National Bank . the corporal ion descdbed in and which executed the foregoing inslrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed 10 said inslrument is such corporate seal; that it was sO afl1xed by order of the board of direclors of $aid corpora. lion. and that be signed his name Ihereto by like order. .~.... ~(.,..~_..., ~th<)(X..,-- Notary . h IJargain anb Ihlr B WITti COViHAWT AOAINST O.AHTOa'~ Ac."fi TITLE NO. iTHE SUFFOLK COUNTY NATIONAL BANK TO NORTH FORK RESOURCES INC. _~CF__*YAft"""TTl\.&_l1CIN ...-.... .. e Fidelity National Title INSUlVlN(1. ?'MI"Al'IY ()I' "HIGYl.\/AMIA . .., ..... . $S: STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF On the day of personally came 19 . before me to me known to be the indivIdual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument. and acknowledged that execuled Ihe same. 55: STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF 88: On the day of personally ,:ame 19 . before me the subscribing wilness to the foregoing instrument. with whom 1 alll personally acquainted. who being by lIle duly sworn. did depOse and say that he resides al No. Ihal he knows 10 be the individual de.cribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument; that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw ex_CUle the same; and that he, said witness. al lhe same lime subscribed h name as willless lltereto. llC\;oIlk4 Al M.CQIIft' uf FideU1Y NatilJlld 'llue RE11JIlN BY MAlt. TO: Joseph e.enedetto c/o Hampton Materials 52 "'oster Avenue Bridgehampton. NY ZiON. 11932 r . 1 I ~ I t i ! I ....- -"--,,.' -,.;. ," ,~, ,.-~- ~"""---..............--.-" , ...r..-.....~.;;.~_.::':'-" . . gO~ILT 1'''~~~1.tL 7(.'$- '3./3<0 PES Rt:.. TD Cb "TOwN ~ HAMPTON MATERIALS ANC HANCL.ING, INC. To the Members of the Board of the town of Southold: As per Monday night work session of July 15th, my only request at this time is to be able to use the Cox Lane facility for our business purposes which is the manufacturing of sand and sand products, such as gravel and various sizes of stone. We don't intend to do any recycling or crushing at the Southold location. Nor do we wish to do any rail road business out of Southold where it comes to dropping rocks and dirt. (We lost the opportunity of doing business with the rail road at this time.) We would also like to conduct our landscaping business and as we discussed last evening, and the ability to do that a.s we submitted previously with artist renderings, bringing down the parking lot to grade level and creating a berm arolJ.nd the property with plants and trees. This then will help tel facilitate our trucks, in maneuvering for turning and loading various materials from site. Thank you. We remain respectfully yours, ~<}r~rr r~ -. ~U~UOO .ll. I Ulll II SOUHIOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD (10 aD~ 1'1 1(" 52 F"OSTER AYENUE, B~IDDf!HAMFTON, NV 1 1932 21.\ 6 ,JACKSON "VENUE. t,.CNG ISLAND CITY. NY I 1 101 (51 6J 537.752~ FAX (51 o. S~7.S463 ..4 . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS R1CHARDG. WARD Chairman pron:?-_> ~.~<;'\\fFOl,t~" ~" ~ :::0 ~ Cl - en :::e ~. ~ ~Q./ + i-~~~ ~<."7.J:Il1 . . ' GEORGE RITClliE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Town Board FROM: Planning Board SUBJECT: Request for Coordination Under SEQRA for North Fork Resources Inc. N/W/C Oregon Road & Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 DATE: July 19, 1996 The Planning Board's ability to comment on your request is compromised by the inadequate and conflicting information presented by the applicant on this project. Some examples of this inconsistency are the different answers on the long environmental assessment forms (LEAF) given to the Planning Board and to the Town Board. Some examples are as follows: Slope in excess of 15%: 30% on Town Board (TB) LEAF, 20 % on Planning Board (PB) LEAF Depth to water: 60' on TB LEAF, 35' on PB LEAF Material removed from site: 25,000 cubic yds. on TB LEAF, 20,000 cubic yds. on PB LEAF Vegetation to be removed from site: 0 on TB LEAF, 4 acres on PB LEAF Period of construction: 60 months on TB LEAF, 2 years on PB LEAF ; , ... . . Pumping capacity of well: 25 gaL /min, on TB LEAF, 5 gaL/min. on PB LEAF Water usage: 1000 gaL/day on TB LEAF: 150 gaL/day on PB LEAF Additionally, this Board is concerned about the following environmental issues: Potential traffic impacts: The applicant should indicate the projected number of daily trips from out of town and from the railroad siding between Youngs and Boisseau Avenues to the Cox Lane site, In addition, the amount of material to be stored on-site at Cox Lane as well as at LIRR siding should be shown. The applicant should also show the projected number of rail cars, number of trucks & truck size. Environmental form question # B 25 should indicate that the action will require approval or review from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The projected use of Long Island Railroad siding site must be detailed. Detail must include type and location of equipment that will be installed, hours of operation, potential noise level, dust control measures, amount of material to be processed and location and type of outdoor lighting. A copy of the lease agreement with the railroad should be requested as well. The Planning Board is very interested in this project and would like to be keep informed as the salvage permit application is processed. - -' }ill f7h ~ -~-~,._.~-..,~","""",,"._---.., c o DRAFT TO: Town Board Laury Dowd, Town Attorney FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer SUBJECT: Hampton Materials, Mr. Richard Principi DATE: July 12, 1996 At the invitation of Messrs. Andrew Freleng, Cheif Planner and Mr. Paul Houlihan, Chief Building Inspector of the town of Southampton, Richie Latham , Bill Cremers and I visited Southampton to review the files of Hampton Materials. Hampton Materials, (Richard Principi Jr. President), has a stone and earth products sales operation adjacent to the Bridgehampton Rail Road Station. In addition, Dolores A. Principi is the owner of vacant property in the Town of Bridgehampton. On April 12, 1996, Dolores A. Principi received a notice of complaint from Southampton Justice Court of a violation of Chapter 330-177(A) of the Code of the Town of Southampton. To wit: Doloris A. Principi, did change the use of a vacant lot to a processing and storage area for crushing stone and concrete without a certificate of occupancy for that use. The property mentioned above had previously been mined, and a large crater now exists that was supposed to be filled and regraded with clean fill. The Town did not consider the crushed concrete and glass etc. as clean fill and ordered Ms. Principi to remove it from the property. To date the fill has not been removed. A new court appearance is due. _"""~_~P'~_"~ ,. .....,"_.,"._,_.""~"M~.........,'""""~_ c .~ Richard Principi Jr. received two complaints from the town, one on January 3, 1996. To wit: Richard Principi Jr. constructed a loading dock for loading railroad cars with construction debris as well as household garbage without the benefit of a building permit. A second complaint was issued on March 6, 1996. To wit: Richard Principi changed the use from storage area for bulk storage of sand, topsoil, gravel and wood chips to a storage area and a transfer and loading area for construction and demolition debris without first obtaining a certificate of occupancy. The file also contains letters from neighbors complaining about freight cars parked adjacent to their property with earthquake like vibrations. Attachments TOWN. OF -JUSTICE - _ - -- _ ,,0.-"- SOUTHA~PTON " COURT --";'~'~1li:jiiii!{S~'~~i.\~'\i1!;5~;~~. ii' --: >'-it(_~:~%Y~.{;J~"'" ,,' . , / ------------------------------------------x People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, BD#96-061 - against - QQlQres A. Princioi Defendant(s) ------------------------------------------x Name (Complainant): Jonathan O. Erwin Ordinance Inspector No. 116 Hampton Rd. Southampton, New York 11968 being duly sworn, says that on 4/12/96 at about ~~~illL at IlQ Middle Line Hiahwav SCTM#0900-30-1-32, Hamlet of BridaeQaIDpton, Town of Southampton, County of Suffolk, State of New York, the defendant(s) Dolores A. princioi. 2400 South Ocean Drive. Fort Pierce. Florida 34949 committed the offense(s) of: Violation of Chapter 330-l77(A) COUNT#l in that: "It shall be unlawful to use or to permit the use of any building, structure, premises, lot or land or part thereof hereafter erected or altered, enlarged or moved or put into use, in whole or in part, after the effective date of this chapter or of any building, structure, premises, lot or land or part thereof which the use is changed until a certificate of occupancy has been obtained by the owner" to wit: "Dolores A. Principi, did change the use or allowed the use to be changed from a vacant lot to a processing and storage area for crushing stone and concrete without first obtaining a certificate of occupancy for that use as stated in Chapter 330-177(A) of the Code of the Town of Southampton." This complaint is based on personal knowledge and a diligent search of the Building Department records ~ridllrif~tm~~l~ri/~rid ~ellefll~Ke/s~~tce/~elri~/~Ke/~~~~cKed/gw~tri/de~~sl~l~ri{sl ~fllllllllllllllllllllllllllld~~edlllllllllllllllllIIII SWORN TO BEFORE THIS 12th DAYOF April 1996 False statement made therein are punishable as a Class A Misdemeanor pursuant to section 210.45 of the Penal Law. q ~0~~a~0 TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON S9U111AM"O(t~"""'" n' ~...."...., ION, No. I, ,..', <,..'i:..... ,'"''12'.' !i4 :Q:t.",..... ~;I:~;:;l \APPEARANCE TICKEr " C;P.t. 150.1~'" " .....,.'.'i:.:;i YOU ..... HI!liIIY ......., 10 ....... ' 't'IN'Ifte. " T, n6w.:::::!:="~~"..-;, ON MAY /1'"''' '. ,'3..!L..:.AT"q'l(jjj) M. TO ANSWER A CHARGE OF C . (") 1O_,,"I.~.---"-' g,-~7LU: 0fllCIR'$ ~_ NO. . . D15PO$1'11CH1: " NO TI C E. UPON YOUI.A1I.IiRETOAIIftAIl AS _.....,01). A ClllMlNAL _ ORA WAIIIIANI' I'0Il YOUR AIBT MAY IE ISSUED. )- II. o U )-' U Z w Cl 0:( w u :::i o II. , c o HAMPTON MATERIALS AND HANDLING, INC. INITIAL PROPOSAL OF HAMPTON MATERIALS AND HANDLING, INC. FOR THE TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON AND THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON Our company was incorporated in New York State on January 5, 1988. We started as a land improvement contractor. As time went on and we expanded into other areas of expertise, Mr. Richard Principi, Jr. had a vision to use the railroad to transport materials such as bluestone from upstate New York (ie: Albany). This progressive endeavor opened up a new market out here on the east end. The last time the railroad was used for freight was back in the early 1960's for the potato market. Since we now started with the rail, we developed a market in Long Island City for the removal of rock and dirt. With construction in the city there is no room for rock, dirt and cement and our method of transport was most welcomed. With the use of a crusher we then opened a new product line which is called crushed concrete or blend. In addition, all materials from the city (see photo) are recycled into many other products ie: fill and topsoil. At the same time our train hauls back sand to the city to cement plants. Environmentally, we solved a major problem of trucking. Each rail car is equivalent to three tractor trailers of materials. If twenty rail cars ran each day for four days per week, that would be the equivalent of 240 trucks per week one-way. Roundtrip would increase the figure to 480 per weer bring the total to 24,960 truckloads over the course of one year. The end result of my conservative example would remove the equivalent of 24,960 trucks from the road annually. The financial benefits to the L.I.R.R. and New York State is that it's a freight operation and realizes significant revenue from the moves. This has permitted the L.I.R.R. to turn what was once a deficit laden operation into one which turns a profit. P.O. Box 1416 S2 FOSTER AVENUE, 8RIDGEHAMPTON. NY 1 1932 21.'6 JACKSON AVENUE, LONG ISLAND CITY. NY 1 1 1 a 1 151 6} 537-7525 FAX {51 61 537-5463 c o HAMPTON MATERIALS AND HANDLING, INC. -2- As our operation has turned a problem into a solution for the L.I.R.R., we can be the solution to the problem of the removal of construction debris which exists in the Towns of East Hampton and Southampton. We offer to the Town, a proposal regarding the generation of construction and demolition debris and its disposal. As a joint cooperative effort with the Town, we would establish a collection and disposal program. This would be accomplished by us providing the equipment to the Town (ie: metal containers, roll-off trucks) at the Town's collection station. We would then remove the containers and dispose of the material at our facility for shipment to a New York State DEe licensed facility. To promote such a venture, the Town should announce and encourage its residents to use the collection facility for disposal of their "Spring" clean-up, house renovations, etc. Materials that we could accept for collection are: 1. wood and wood by-products 2. plastics 3. metal 4 . gypsum 5 . rugs 6. mattress, box springs 7. cardboard We here at Hampton Materials and Handling, Inc. of Bridgehampton await the opportunity to discuss this proposal with the Town and we thank you for the opportunity of being able to assist you. Respectfully submitted, -;:Ud~ -f- Richard J. principi, Jr. President P.O. Box 1416 52 FOSTER AVENUE, BRIDGEHAMPTDN. NY 1 1932 21-'6 JACKSON AVENUE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 1 1 101 (S 161 537-7525 FAX (5161 537.5463 TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON JUSTICE COURT c o _~________________________________________x People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, BD#96-029 - against - Richard Principi Jr. Hampton Materials Corporation Officer Defendant(s) __________________________________________x Name (Complainant): Jonathan O. Erwin Ordinance Inspector No. 116 Hampton Rd. Southampton, New York 11968 being duly sworn, says that on 3/5/96 at about 2:00 p.m. at ~ Foster Avenue SCTM#0900-69-1-9, Hamlet of Bridaehamoton, Town of Southampton, County of Suffolk, State of New York, the defendant(s) Richard princioi Jr. Hamoton Materials Corooration Officer. 136 Main Street. Amaaansett. New York 11930 committed the offense(s) of: violation of Chapter 330-l77(A) COUNT#l in that: "It shall be unlawful to use or to permit the use of any building, structure, premises, lot or land or part thereof hereafter erected or altered, enlarged or moved or put into use, in whole or in part, after the effective date of this chapter or of any building, structure, premises, lot or land or part thereof which the use is changed until a certificate of occupancy has been obtained by the owner" to wit: "Richard Principi Jr. Hampton Materials Corporation Officer, did change the use or allowed the use to be changed from storage area utilized for bulk storage of sand, topsoil, gravel, wood chips, ETC. (Certificate of Occupancy # C15289 issuied 6/16/93) to a storage area utilized for bulk storage of sand, topsoil, gravel, wood chips, etc. and a transfer and loading area for construction and demolition debris without first obtaining a certificate of occupancy for that use as stated in Chapter 330-177(A) of the Code of the Town of Southampton." This complaint is based on personal knowledge and a diligent search of the Building Department records ~nallnf0tm~~10n/~na ~ellefll~Me/30nt~e/~eln~/~Me/~~~~~Mea/3w0tn/aep031~10n~31 0fllllllllllllllllllllllllllla~~ealllllllllllllllll1I1I SWORN TO BEFORE THIS 6th DAY OF March 1996 False statement made therein are punishable as a Class A Misdemeanor pursuant to section 210.45 ~f the Penal Law. /} A-- <-.1 0Jt:-O L___" tlG / Complainant TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON JUSTICE COURT ~---_:---------------~------------------X c:> People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, BD#96-001 - against - Richard princioi Jr. Hamoton Materials Corooration Officer Defendant(s) __________________________________________x Name (Complainant): Jonathan O. Erwin Ordinance Inspector No. 116 Hampton Rd. Southampton, New York 11968 being duly sworn, says that on 1/3/96 at about 8:30 a.m. at ~ Foster Avenue. SCTM#0900-69-1-9, Hamlet of Bridaehamoton, Town of Southampton, County of Suffolk, State of New York, the defendant(s) Richard princioi Jr. Hamoton Materials Corooration Officer. 136 Main Street. Amaaansett. New York 11930 committed the offense(s) of: Violation of Chapter 123-9A(1) COUNT#l in that: "No person, firm or corporation shall commence the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, removal, improvement, demolition, conversion or change in the use or nature of the occupancy of any building or structure or cause the same to be done without first obtaining a building permit". to wit: "Richard Principi Jr. Hampton Materials Corporation Officer, did construct or allowed to be constructed, a loading dock approximately fifteen(15) feet high utilized for loading railroad cars with construction debris as well as household garbage at the above noted location without the benefit of a building permit as stated in Chapter 123-9A(1) of the Code of the Town of Southampton." This complaint is based on personal knowledge and a diligent search of the Building Department records ~n~/inf~tm~~i~n/~n~ ~eZiefll~He/g~~t~e/~ein~/~He/~~~~~He~/3~~tn/~e~0gi~i~n(gl ~flllllllllllllllllllllllllll~~~e~11111111111111111IIII SWORN TO BEFORE THIS 3rd DAY OF January 1996 False statement made therein are punishable as a CI",::.' ^ Misdemeanor pursuant to section 210.45 of the Penal Law. ~cA-D L 1--' tl0 ComplaJ.nant TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON c :> TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON DEPARTMENT OF LAND MANAGEMENT-BUILDING DIVISION COMPLAINT FORM .:. DATE i I d. h ::;- I I COMPLAINANT U1l\.Pr1.J '" ^ )Yv'X) Name d' TIME COMPLAINT No.(2. q6 ..i- Address Phone 1# COMPLAINT RECEIVED BY ,rf-jJCJ~ LOCATION OF COMPLAINT ~uTTS( L':) Street & No. BetbdE~p'b-0 mlet TAX MAP NO.0900-~1 - 9 (If available) NATURE OF COMPLAINT JlIUI, 10'.sfs,c.,! )0,.) e, '1 ~P6\ F lD l/'u''T10 C- Pd. 6 V \.J \j ASSIGNED To:~0 . F DATE 'I ~/'1S- ~))t? R...fH11 P (" (,-,,)l1Cr?,)r T/?,,(J DATE 1/3/ 0J . -.......J I I i i'J C-It":e.. DP:t: ic~ I.)~>.. r-n .,..,.... ;i7J. P( i"-^J1 '-J +,-,,)~l'" ~i.;u (r..":1?J2.d'C1 FIRST SECOND INSPECTION DATE THIRD INSPECTION DATE FINAL DISPOSITION DATE CHECK ONE UNFOUNDED____ LETTER SENT____ SUMMONS ISSUED~ CC# r~LP'tv, .,. c o ~ /~/ rv1 ' <)' / L A vJ 0 ;]7 .J- '33 g- ~~_ev:d '. ~ ~ (R~.) fltl(/':crJ Ir 0 JACE'f'/i To Pf(oPElZT Y f<-2o ~"jVG" RESOLve: ifr<()!f:/I~/r TH/~ t4l!Fow.)~~ <,s"_'yt~JtJ~.r~~~T'.jii;;.~~~'M,,~~"'-'V'-8.'S;(~~,,~~~~;it~1i'0~i;';::r:::L,.'.__ o U~JSI(~t+rL Y Pf?E<;a.,<ce- 1fl.Kes II v/P>TVAL.LY IMP"HII}Lt: () SELL ~7 A f(E5f()Eluc~ r:=-'(<.:y ~EPAE<;StN (, 10 Loo/, Lit of. VJIA/f)O "'5 <t- SE.;c THO iGHr MY O1E~\JcS r IS TlfIt, PAoH-l-5tf TIfE U5~ or:: 7 LOCfJTIO,v 1'r5 Ii- '57611o"'/11<..j 010HT 'jAfZ.f) w ITC1 (It~ ~t<IIVG 0 f ~t;;.IGHT L'"l-~~ "CEfVl..,...,... Y ,~1oA fAo('c'P.. ry '7/1-/ c ra...e:L:i W.sQ~ "~-"'._~._---.......~~_.,._._- '--,-,",,,,"-~-,,,, .'-.- -,,-".~.,.._.....--, o ,'~M'-~.;-; ~ < ,~,{.;,.~,,~ '-.,,~\"o1F!j.,(.' , ,. 1"" " 1-1(<... r=RWloJ WILLI ftM ')1 LAbllO IFy LLht'1e'E~ LAw~ rEiZlOGeH/f-01fJolrJ 5-;7-.2-').36 R.,~, FRE/C.HI YArZl? RECc/VILY ES Tr')13L IS HcO It()J~T 70 I'" Y f/<.of'E1Z:lY~RFSIOEIVIII1L R. ~ ).0 CO"''''<..Il-,N,' / fA' . 1 MOl/lfV6jv llE.qvy .- of Cft,eS GI4c.k <t--F",t'{llf Cf'?l?Itr5 EArt/1f ~'h<tl'~ 1.-11<6= VI8MrlOl"S IfJ TIU: rio us c - VI ~H~ RfHT L.G - PI C fU 1lC5 p,.,...... O(-f. '-'I'f.,-,? -Tl-tv,vOcA'fVb i"'D,Si? t::f!.1:/e.,fr Ut(.l.~ t..-EPT r7A.Rl<8p G~flfFHI Ptl/~7~() o(V 5,Qcp ~--"'~';'""".'''''-''''''''-''--'''. .. .",...."'"-"'.,"'.s.~v;...;.;:".</......',.:."."._~ o ,0 ~A '1'10-0 I I I '! T>( 6el. IIA T>( 1(5-- () 1 ? I I 'I ,Ik ~ ~ 4-0 #(5 ~ ffi ,I I. I{c-v-s (7/ If-"",<,I'~' ~j/:4 ~ .1 cera.;.I/ IkAd/J' J 0~6 i 'I I / I " 'I ;1 " . '_"" .. _..~.', .,'~"r_ ~_. .~>~"~,<...,~...~~~__~"",...","""-">,-~,,,,~.......~.,,.._--.,._. ".-"'-'" ~,,~~. ,.-. ."....',...,..:..""'-.."..",.......'..,:,..,;....."'-"".:~""~..""'-.."...-,..~:~ ',- "->'. ,', . c ._"._....-"."....._---,........_-_.,-,-,_...",.~>.~",.'> .'..,.,~,,,..;._.'-,,.,~-, """ '-' i~-," ", 36.2 3,"' lid l~, _'!_~_RBOR ",,-,......-;: 41.' 'U.6.lcl 41.2 3,(\A(t;1 ---"'~ .,.3 !.I-'tel -_..~~- -- --_::..-- \ I I ~----- . 8 : . .. " .... 3'hl '" 39.2 !I.llA _____...z:'"' liD '~4' ..' . ("9" '..:") ,. . 40.1 3.lJAt:$ . , 'M 3.,...ill !I,UW " " to.' 41.4 3,1l~ .... -'-- ,. 6.40\ --!,... --, " !I.9.lld HWy. SCH. D. 14 -self SCH. O. 9 I ~ '" '" J\ -1 I I , 166')- ,.' " ~_6r4cl Lh-- VREL Jo,n-y OfI.K'7 'f, ,,'" , I ,\ , FOR PARCEt,. MO. SU SEt. NO. 03'-01-014.3 ".. " ''''''. .. Ie. I Aid '.. .. 3.6.10(<1 '., -r---~~-~LtNl- lEVUI' ~onlOO n " " ,_gAte) no' f'/F """'" .. 22,t,(o.} " SOlidi 19"t) 4603 46.2 LIlA 1.8" "" ..... ---- ,u' ,~ 1 .,' , , " " " soAlel 'F" ' ~ ...------- z ~ ! II~ ~~ , .. '.4A "', ! --"~ - to ., to/ltl ,; " 2.6A(c) " 4_01. " . ,"' ... ..." 4.'!t#ll,d .. 0>' '. '. r...,lcl ",' " Lull::l "f ~, ~ '., " I ~. I . ... @ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ,..... -.:SOl.JTHM Real Property Tax Service Agency "UAG'" c'.I" . "....-... ", 0). :~_~, _' ,',:.. !; o ',. . "IItb. " . ....... ....., , 7-11- .7.6' o I ! I j j , I I I ! . t . . . i I J .\ I 1 I t I t , f o c ... . ~!I [)GUMII1PTOtl ~.~r;Tt? t :.J:':.'". ,+';,;.i.' J,4. l~ c' . ".~"._--'.~-,",-~.~.,--,,~..- ,...",..~,.-...-._........~.~.,....,...." c o July 3, 1996 Richard J. Principi, Jr. 52 Foster Avenue Bridgehampton, NY 11932 RE: Proposed site plan for North Fork Resources Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Mr. Principi, The Planning Board has received your letter of June 24, 1996, in response to the Board's letter to you of June 18, 1996, regarding your excavation plan. The Board cannot process an "excavation plan", but will require a site plan showing all site plan details. Such detail must include: 1. Statement on plan should read "site plan" not "excavation plan". 2. Access road to equipment site; show details of construction. 3. Drainage calculations and leaching pool construction. 4. Any proposed out door lighting, including type fixture and wattage. 5. Scale 1" = 20'. 6. Separate key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within (500) feet, as shown on the latest tax records, at a scale of (1) inch equals one hundred (100) feet. c .AI """ 7. Copy of deed. S. Landscaping details. 9. Approximate location of all equipment, even if portable. 10. Location of any fuel storage drums, dumpsters, or other receptacles for storage of material. 11. The location and design of parking stalls; show parking calculations. 12. Outdoor signs if proposed. 13. The location and details of fencing (type and location). 14. Grading, including existing and proposed topography with two-foot contours on site and (200) feet beyond the property line. 15. Grading and drainage plans shall be based upon site storm water retention in conformance with Chapter A10S, Highway Specifications. 16. Floor plans of existing building showing all proposed uses of floor area. The above list should not be considered a complete list. Please consult Town Code Article XXV, 100-256, technical data for site plans. In addition: 1. Traffic data; to include number of daily trips from the railroad siding between Youngs and Boisseau Avenues, to site and amount of material to be stored on-site at Cox Lane as well as at LIRR siding. Show projected number of rail cars, number of trucks & truck size. 2. Environmental form question # B 25 should indicate that the action will require approvals from the Town Board, Suffolk County Health Department and New York D.E.C. 3. Site Plan of Penney lumber/Long Island Railroad siding site. Detail must include type and location of equipment that will be installed, hours of of operation, noise level, dust, amount of material to be stored and location and type of out door lighting. The Board would like a copy of the leasing agreement. "".__"___-z,~._...,.~,,_,. r ..,. "'" ....., 4. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has indicated to this Board that they wish to review this project because of the change in use and intensity of use. When the requested site plan and technical data is received the Board will continue with its review. If you have any questions, please contact this office. r 4t -i..,-- Sincerely, ~ .- Robert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Jean W. Cochran, Town Supervisor Charles Voorhis, Town Enviormental Consultant Thomas Bjorkman, Long Island Railroad Town Board . -- 14 .1heSullolk1'lmi!llc. - June'27,"f996' ,,---~_.. -. ~.- . Town-Wary ~11 Sand/Grave' Venture () BY TIm KlIIIlI' '-~iIl\YaIICOdby. ~~"'IO_ ~ 01 _ and build . SID'" c:msbiuI......... _..... IllIIIO loca1 olIiciaII sayiD& rememl><< Brectnock HaD. ...... .' A key __ 01 RicbanI PrincipI'. JlRlPOIIlIO build . pIaDt 10 pulverize -. met and brick c:miod by ..... _ New Yon: CiIy to die forme< !l8vIl JII1lIlOIIY llD CoX r.- is first 10 level .... 8""""1 by IOIIIOViD& and soU. ing 25,000 cubic ~ 01 saud. Tbc opeIlIIO< or NorIh Pod: Rosoan:es IDe.. Mr. Principi IOId Town IloonI memb<<s -Taesday.1baI bis openlioo would DOt be COIDDI<ICiaIlyviab1e _ .... sale of tboSlllld. '. . The price or real estate as viewed from above grouDd is _ debalab1e. but ........110 argumeot over tbo value or wbat'. found below ground: Sand may be simply die stuff of beaches 10 many. but 10 OIbeBit.s gold. ( ). I Southold Bilh;".;. Supc.;..lendeot Ray JBOObs said tile lOWO pays abooI $6.25 . cuhic yord for saud. and grav" cao briDg asmudl.as 530. yard. Mr. Principi'. _ is _Ibe IOWO IaDd6I1. . -wbicb Ibe bisbway cIcpsr\mOIIl mined for Ibe saud spread cIming IIIIOWSlOIJIIS and Jl'llYOl employed in drainage pr0- jects bel... Ibe .... was closed seversl yesnogo. AbooI 20 peICOlIt of tile maJOrial at tile IaodfiII is tile mcxe vs1usb1e graYOl. tile ~said, and Ibe price is so high 1baIdIe highway department DOW..... oalysaud in drainage won:. Tba\'. why Mr. Principi'. applies.... 10 tile 'TOWD Boaid for a salvaging permit imftfoMi,tp.ly brougbl compar- isons 10 the Bm;tnoct Hall condo- minilUD project on Route 25 in Green. port. Although the owuers of that sonndfrout pDJCeI bold all permits and ntility conuacts for 350 units. COD$lrUC' lion did DOt continue beyond tile ..... vution or a large hole sbowD on tile ap- proved site plan as an artifICial. pond. Doring ""'I'uescIay'.1xiard'won: session discussion Couucilman J.. Townseod estimatecI that tile pit yieIdecI S3 miI1ion in saud. a vs1usb1e r~~"uty in the lXlIISIIDCliQo iDcbsy. . .,,,,. lOWO'basbeOa bumed by this w_ wewece Icft with barIelllaDd; Fisben Island J...... Louiss E.... Slid duriug Taesday'. won: ......, discus- sion. Mining Without "Permit In March Mr. Principi paid $410,000 for six acres and a 12,O(lO--squsIo-fuut .meral buiIdins uoce used 10 SUR patty teats _ surroll:. Couuty NatinuaI Bank, wbicb bad \lIkeD title in a fCllOClo- - .... action. Town olIiciaII said be .... bepu mining sand ....... and bad_ rated the _ from the gra.... hot wi_ a pomtit. : After being _ with a slOp won: ordec. Mr. Principi was - up by IOWO investigalOr Ed _ for 11II:- ins out an ..timated SOD cnbic yards. That case is to continue in Soutbold Justice Court oa Aug. 14. .00 Tuesdsy Mr. Priucipi 1OId.... 01- ficiaIs thatbis __ beyllDd Ibe ...... "1'10 1101 going 10 dig a ho1e,"be said. Tbc sand, be said, will be IOIIIOVOII only 10 ..... Ibe poperty 10 a grade 18 inches. above the rood. Tbc crusbins plaJU.:be .w; will be SlIlIOIIIllIed by .. . _ besm lO_uoise ad dust. He addCd tbai be'. wiI1ing 10 posta boDd 10 cover1he town'. canc:Gos-over being 1eftwilh an opeu~. Tbc operaIOI" or a similar _ in BridgebampIOD. Mr. Priucipi said bein. tends 10 bring oUl 20 JlliIroad cars pee week, in two llk:ar!rips wilh escb cor csrrying lOll IaIS, or met ad soil \lIkeD _ a \UJlIlOl project in MaspeIh. Queens. Tbc..- wonId be cntsbed in Culcl>ogue and sold.lIe'd also bring out COIICIOte. asphalt and bricks col. 1erted at the fivwcre yanI be owns uear tbo Queens MidJown 1imneI in Long Is. land City. It woo't be construCtion and demoli. lion debris, be said, and in JOSpODSO 10 board memb<<s' concerns he said the , material will be clea and that bis up. crati.on is monitored by the state De- partment of. Environmental Cooscrva- I lion.".., ' Mr. Principi said be's considering an anangcmeot to use lite rail siding near the former Southold Lumber business off Youngs Avenue in Southold. and bas also Iouked iUlo sidings in MattilUCk and Jamespon. A Planning Boord SIlIf( member'srepurtthat the. URR is DOt in. terested in such an arrangement is incorrect. he added ' "My plant is -s.tate .of the an ;and portable; be IOld the board. "I lhonght it would be a nice asset to the commu- nity. It's a neat operation. It's not noisy. its DO{. dusty. It's DOl. going to have any impsctata1l." When Mr. Priucipi pressed the board for a decision date. Supervisor Jean CocIuan noted that the board cannot act without first completing an environmental assessmenL Should the Town BosrcI grant a salvage pecntil, the bnsiness would be snbjectlO Planning BosrcI site plan tOView. -,-,----,..,.,."..,.,.."'-"'_....._~...'" - - ~ _ Ph ~rr ,... HAMPTON MATERIALS AND HANDLING, INC. June 26, 1996 J(JN 2 11996 ~ Hallil Town of Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Tel: 516-765-1938 Fax: 516-765-1823 Attn: Mrs. Jean Cochran Supervisor Re: North Fork Resources, Inc. Recycling (Salvage) Permit Dear Mrs. Cochran: Thank you for the opportunity of having my application and renderings reviewed. I was very encouraged by our interaction at the work session on Tuesday. Now having made this presentation, I am most anxious to receive feedback from the Town Board with reference to what my next steps should be and how long you project this process will take. I am specifically interested in your position on the removal of material from the site. I acquired the Cox Lane site knowing full well that I was buying into a heavy industrial commercial area. with regard to this it is my understanding that I am working with the Town Planning Board to get the site plan amended along with a usage change. I would like to know the Board's position on my concept of the proposed locations ie: Cox Lane and the Rail Head (old Southold lumber site) . 52 FOSTER AVENUE, BRIDGEHAMPTON, NY 1 1932 21-16 JACKSON AVENUE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101 (516) 537-7525 FAX (516) 537-5463 "..,~.~...------- ,.... '- -- '-' HAMPTON MATERIALS AND HANDLING, INC. I can assure you that once having removed the material, we will not be leaving a hole of any sort. Please refer to the site plan, topographical map and renderings which were submitted with my application. We will be grading the property for the removal of sub-soil and all topsoil and clay will remain on the site for reclamation to establish landscape burms. In addition, the Town neighborhood would benefit from me excavating the site to proposed elevation, in that stockpile elevation and location will be at same grade as existing parking area. If allowed to grade and landscape the site as proposed, there will also be dust, noise and aesthetic benefits by allowing me to proceed when my amended site plan is finally accepted. The building on Cox Lane does have a C/O, therefore no other Health Dept. approval is necessary. The only condition that warrants the attention of the Health Dept. is the contaminated ground water directly attributed to the Southold Town Landfill's practice of open pit dumping of raw sewage for many years. I am aware of the problems this presents and yet my activities can be appropriately acclimated to these conditions. It is not my wish to avail myself of any legal means regarding this contamination. Instead, it is my intent to work closely with the Town in being able to supply clean processed material for the local economy/contractors and also for possible help with the closure of the existing landfill/sand mine. Any material coming out to our facility is tested, registered and heavily regulated. We will be processing clean rock and dirt. It is our hope that we can in turn pass savings on to the Town's people and also be in a position to offer our experience and expertise with the rail system to help the Town with their solid waste problems. Another issue of great importance, which calls for immediate attention, is my posting a bond (now), of a fair agreed upon amount, with the Town while my application is under review with the Town and Planning Boards. This will enable me to start preparing my site for business so that I need not lose any further opportunities. From the onset, time has been of the essence since we have felt a tremendous negative economic impact from this delay. We have lost several large accounts and we are steadily losing our credibility with the L.I.R.R. 52 FOSTER AVENUE, BRIDGEHAMPTON, NY 1 1932 21-16 JACKSON AVENUE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101 (5161 537-7525 FAX (5151 537-5463 .._~-'"~--~-.~~.~'..~-- -- - .'v -- HAMPTON MATERIALS ANO HANDLING, INC. We have been actively pursuing the resolution of this issue for four months now and it appears to me that we have made no strides forward. All we want to do is conform with the actions and activities of everyone else who is doing business on the block. Through all my experience with development and construction in the Towns of Southampton and East Hampton, my proposed process of grading and leveling the site would be deemed as an excess fill situation. It is my sincere hope that the Town Board will notify me in the very near future as to what the status of this situation is and when I can start to move ahead. Thank you for your time and consideration. RiCh~~. p:.d,pr =.,1.., cc: Alice Hussie, Councilwoman Ruth Oliver, Councilwoman Louisa Evans, Councilwoman Joe Townsend, Councilman Bill Moore, Deputy Supervisor Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Judy Terry, Town Clerk Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Bill Clemens, Town Planner 52 FOSTER AVENUE, BRIDGEHAMPTON, NY 1 1932 21~16 JAOKSON AVENUE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101 (5161 537-7525 FAX (5161 537-5463 -,-<"_,,^'"'.h.'~<-e_.....,__~_ -'~^",,~-,-,...,,~-~-_.........- , ... ,- - -, -' ~ <<tis JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTlCS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 26, 1996 Lead Agency Coordination Request The purpose of this request is Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) and 6 NYCRR Part 617, the following: to determine under Article 8 (State of the Environmental Conservation Law 1. your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.] Enclosed is a copy of the application and a complete Long Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: North Fork Resources Inc., Richard J. Principi Jr. Requested Action: Application for a Salvaging Center SEQRA Classification: Type I Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk, Town of Southold. The lead agency will deter.mine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. If you have an interest in being lead agency, please contact this office immediately. I f no response is received from you within 30 days of the date of this letter, it will be assumed that your agency has no interest in being lead agency. i1 . i JtJN 2 7 ~ iL':;.. I ~ I ': , L---__.~ ----l : L.__fli/r~;J;rf!i:?;jj{8 __~~~_, ; .~.---..,--- "'";..,--~~.....__.._- "age 2. ,...., - "'" - Agency Position: This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [ X] This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. Other. (See comments below) Comments: Please . feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, ~~ Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures Copies of this request and all attachments to the following: Commissioner Zagata, NYS-DEC, Albany Robert Greene, NYS-DEC, Stony ~k Southold Town Planning BoardV Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Plannining Suffolk County Department of Health Servies NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island North Fork Resources Inc. (without attachments) Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board (without attachments) . . I I I . I . I i I I . ~ o o APPLICATION FOR A SALVAGING CENTER I N THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Yi W; rCQ~ Jhc Name of Applicant, I ~ivi~ual, Corporation Partnership B~q~ Qi5'/- lane Irclr~fvt'1 Nev.J\f~k- \\'t3S Address of Business or Activity r ' Exact Type of Business to be conducted ~.~. o~f- Stto- \Ml)Wi.,h I&w.K,t4_~fl0" I ~1~)' ~~\e ~ ~-,;:- : r am under 21 years of age Yes ;/ No Yes V No I am a citizen of the United States Convicted of Felony or Misdemeanor Yes No /' Number of employees to be engaged \2- ~d~fu~pt ~. f.~~ )0J \ l'l;ro Name and Address of owner of lands and nature of the right of occupancy of the applicant to the use of such land. Applicant must file map or plan of real property upon which business is to be conducted with the following information: ~ \ltea:::e ~e. c\...~hed c 0'O'!. '1 '1: hereby certify that all the above information is true.to the best of my knowledge and belief and that I will conduct the business pursuant to the regulations set forth in the Ordinance Licensing and Regulating Secondhand,' Junk and Auto Parts Activities and Businesses. 1. 2. 3. 4. Location of Location of Leca tion of Location of fence required. buildings. streets and highways. water and gas mains. f I~e :k Signat e of APPll'!!n'C Sworn to before me this ,y day of :ILne 19Q1o. '" ,.-1 /'J ~~7G~,7 ," I;.. L_<-~L'L- Not\ary Pub'lic UNDA J. COOPER "'ota,,! P~blic. Stlte of N_ York _,_ ~~___..._._ H _ /"1' 'if' . -~' --~ " . . - , Answers to questions on p.l of Application for Regulating... 1. Location of operation - corner of Cox Lane and Oregon Rd. ~ Reference all information from site plan. A) Existing Parking - 35,000 sq. ft. E) Proposed Parking - 60,000 sq. ft. 2. . . 3". No containers necessary / materials need ground saorage / pyramidal stockpiles. 4. Storage facilities as per site plan / pre-existing metal building. ,~, 0 .-.-,' >-;,....,-- Noeth ii'ork Re"ource~ I J:.{l!;.,...................................................... _11._ J . '~l-'" ...._.... .................n..~..........:oli.....:!"l'....... .... ". .-;:c,-;,~s ::7 ."pp.::~:~! .....~.?~.~...~.9.;...\.~n-.~.'....S;),l.\;f~99.1,\~.(...~~...lJ,~.~.~........................... ;.: =tai~ec s:atl!r.'::;n: ~f ;:rcposed operatIOns ....~.lf.R.{...Jf1.~.':...:.!9.~J..c;...~.~~~.~...~...9~.f.':U1.i~...~Q. be a~pC'oved foe the crushing of concrete and natural sand-stone to develp~ ... ........................................................ ?Co'diicts"'that"'co'uld'''b;eI''s'old'''and'''Cii'S't::;:bU:tad on the Noeth O'oelt to hel;;> I e s !;.a,Q.+. j, ~.I;l, ..!?'.~l!.. .\<y..~j,n-.~ ~Al... .~.9. r::..J!f.l\,...J;n.9.................. ............... ........ ........ ......................... We also ~ant the ability to separate and screen maeerials such as stone, g J::a ve:l..,...1::op:so-j:J:..~d'..c=stred'..c==et:e.:.....m.m....................m................................. ~ . --- ';. ~~ ,:::::;lec :i:::terr.::;;! .:Jf ~ropcsea cperations Request permit to grade parking area ....... ... ... ... ...~.. ... ..'U~..~n"h .n.......~n.n.... ...........~~........ . . to l~.v:el..~J...9.;:e~.~...~~...~~.~.p....~~~~li tate equi.,ment park.ing and stoC'age and p.::o pos ed o!?eca tiollS eeques'iac"ciy...8tr~';""1:iic':''''~nrc1i'''''!~T''C:~n'S t:s-t:"'of" 0 f ~ ?!;".?.!2.~.;::::;y...!!I.~.t;.e.;::.:i,.~;L.~~E~~.~~ng and se!?arations of gravel and sand from o~her job si tes. This cequest ".i'i'n"'aTso"'lieIt:i"'c:i"o'reoar'e'''e~~'''(lr'O"c;a'!''t:'''''''ftlC' futuJ::e , ., ~. . ..... ..... z . :::u~_O~~gs.,t;l1..~:~..~j,.+.~...~~...~!:.'?2~.~~~...~.'?!:. .~FR, Inc. and submi::ced :0 clle Town o.f. Southold. .Hl '.oC'l<: and scceenirig"'c'o"'c'e"con'e"c'ii'''s'rt'l!''':!:5''a-el::'C1t:,cram:e '.i tll accC':::ved ~ork. :::lans. Please note: All 'cocsoil ~ill not oe .amoved ~-om " -_.- ................:...............................................,.......-. - - --.- .?cem~.3es =UC lool1J....:. :::Ie 9UC ~nl:O =ocfu".rii"g...:i...our:fC.a:c.olinc..."t;~.e...~.e!:"i"ltt~~l!!:s of :::: pco~~~.~y...~:?...~~...;?.+.~~.~:::?:..~~.~.~~... t=ees and :verg:::aens and seeded... ....................................................................................... I --'--- --- -0 .- H-16-2 (2t8il-7e 617.21 Appendix A Slate Environmental Quality Revi_ FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM seaR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderly manner. whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly. there are aspec-,s of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically ei<pert in environmental analysis. In addition. many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly. comprehensive in nature. yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifyina basic project - data. it assists a reviewer in the analysiS that takes place in Parts 2 an~ 3: = Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that 'may occur from a pmject or a..uon. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderatepr whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduc.ed. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. . DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-Type 1. and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAf completed ior this project: 0 Part 1 U Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information ;ecorded on this oAF (PartS 1 and 2 and 3 if aopropriatel. and any other supporting information. and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact. it is reasonably determined by the iead agency that: o A. The project will not result in any large and important impae.{s) and. thereiore. is one which wiil not have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a negative dedaration will be prepared. o 8. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment. there will not be a significant effect tor this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures desc:ibed in PART 3 have been required. thererore a CONDITIONED negatiVe declaration will be prepared.' o C. rne project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a positive dedaration will be prepued. ~ A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid ior Unlisted Actions NOv'-th FSrt. ~~IIVr a_~ Name or Ac:ion S6LLfuOn ~c /,""' I CV\..1j\ Name or L.::!.ad Agenc/ ~~l_vd ?nnt or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature 'Jr .,esoonsibie Officer In Lead ,-\~ency ~\ )Vi...( \ Title of Responsible .Ofticer _2Idvu,.d Y(lna:p I ~ISJnature or P:-eoarer (Ii diiferent from resoonsibie officer; '2W1lQQLD Dare '-:t'7""~:::::::':':==':::"""-"--- _ '5,~'.0;',""'_i2P e. . '- , , PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to-assist in determining-whether the action proposed may have a significant errec on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A t!lroUih E. Answers .to these questions will be considere, as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently availabf" and will not Involv, new studi"s, r"search or inv"stigation. If information r"quiring such additional work is unavailabl", so indicate and spedf. each instance.' , 1"Zl ~, = NAME pE." O'f<.NER (If dl 0. ..WJ r\'yt.c, illJ:) r L f1 ADDRESS ~ 4q (" ClTYlPOf1nlQ {nx'\S<J:t )V\.{ IIQ,?,O DESCRIPTION OF Acnotl aUSlNESS TE1..EP+IONE ("3lio S-::~.;l 'I S 2. '\ I ~'tlllr4~ Pl"as" Compl"t" Each Qul!Stion-lndiat" N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall. project. both dev"loped and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban Gfndustrial OCommercial OResidential (suburban) OForest OAlriculture OOther {o.L ORural (non-fam 2. Total acreage of project area: APPROXIMATE ACRE.4.CE "Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forl!Sted Agricultural (Indudl!S orchards. cropland. pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articies 24, 25 of EC~) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) Roads. :,uiidings and other ~aved surfaces Other (Indicate lYpe\ acres. '-\ PRESENTL ~ AFTER COMPLETION acres ~ acres acres acres acres acres acres acres '-l acres acres acres acres 2- acres acres acres acres 3. 'Nhat is :Jredominant soil tvPetSJ on ::)rolec: site? ':;"'t a. Soii drainage: ~ell draIned Ie 0 % of SJte =Pooriv drained % ot site O. if anv agnc:Jlturai land ~s lnvOlve~. now :nanv acres or 50ii are ciassiiied within joii ;irouc ~ Land Classification System? \\Jjp. acres. ':See -: >.jYCRR 3iOl. I Are there beoroc:< outcroooings on :Jro,ec~ $ite? =Yes :;t<io a. What :s cieoth::o ~edrocx? -- \Jit;<1)/ ':in ~ee!:l , , I 1"\ fLU ae.."f"y-\ =M?derateiv weil drained % or :iite :hrough 4- or the NY . . I . 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ". . o Approximate percentage of proposed project site wit~ropes: 00-10% 013 % or greater % 010-15% ~,-\ % % Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain a buiiciing. site. or dis.trlct. listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? OYes ~o Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? DVes ..2No r . What is the depth of the water table? - (.p (in feet) tv:J 4: '3 \'1TV~ vva. U(" 15 site located over a primary, principal. or sole source aquifer? DVes ::9'No C!~-hY'r\.lna..-ta.d my.., . C4.7 Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DVes 1Q1<l0 Does project site co}'tain anv species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DVes &No According to I dentify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (Le., cliffs. dunes. other geological formations) OVes 9fQo Describe ". .- tbe project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an "pe.r space or recreation area? DYes ett<ro If yes. explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DVes [J1<l0 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: (\()() e a. Name of Scream and name of River to which it is tributary 13. Is 16. Lakes. ponds. wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Is the site served by -existing p~blic utilities? ~ es DNo a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes. will improvementS be necessary to allow connection? Is the site located in an agricultural distric certified pursuant Section 303 and 304?=Y es ~o 19. Is the site located in or sUDstantiallv contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR ol7? DYes ~o 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of soiid or hazardous wastes? DYes Wo (\Q..... e.. b. Size (In acres) e.le.c.-m c.. ~es DNo OVes 31<10 17. 18. to A~ricuiture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA. B. P~oject-Oescription 1. Phv;jcaJ dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as approCriatt a. -; otai contiguous ac.ea~e owned or controlled bv prolec.: sponsor - 2- b. Pfloject ac:eage ::0 be developed: . (t) L acres initiaJly; f..JJ. ~ c. Projec: ac:eage to remain undevejoped '" c ("\ ~ acres. c. Length or project. in miies: t\..I~ (If appropriate) e. If the oroie~: is an expansion, indicate oercent aT e:mansion ,:::roposed :~umber or orr-jtreet parKing soaces existing 7..,..c ; proposed g. ,\I\aXlmum '/enicuJar trios generated per 'our 5 (upon .:ompletlOn OT proieC'~)? h. if ~eslden(iai: ~umcer ana type or housing unitS: One ramiiy Two Famiiv acres. acres ultimately. Iv1"Pr . %; l\4ujtipie Famiiy Condominium !nu:iailv L:ltimateiv DimenSions ~:in iee~j .JT ~arges't ::rooosec 5UUC:ure ~ ne!~n:: .a- WlCJ:n; . . . . - . . ... . . I . . . ...mear :ee! .:)f ~rontage along a :JUCIIC :norougnrare oro,ec: Will occ~ov :sl M{J. length. ~t. :S;::;;:,-~_~_:-" - . e- . ~ 2. How much natural material (i.e.. rock. earth. etc.) will be removed from the site? 2'5,61)0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? QYes DNa CN/A I' t1 . a. If yes. ior what mtenc__ purpose is the site being reclaimed? fey 'S..'\il\d I QvCS'U'I\ l-r~1r dt.J1.... b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~es ."DNa c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? &lYes DNa 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs. ground covers) will be removed from site? - 0- acres. 5. Will any mature terest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes ~o . 6. If single phase project Anticipated period of construction ~ 0 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated Z- (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 C'v'11l I ~_ month .-1'3 q V year, (including demolition). c. !-pproximate completion date of final phase {\Ill t{-- month ~_year. d..1s phase.1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Mes DNa' 8. WiIl'~blaSting occur during construction? DYes ~. . 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ ; after project is complete G 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project Y"\/W'\ e.. 1'. Will project require relocation or any projects or facilities? Dyes !S;I!4o If yes, explain 15. Is surface liquid waste. disposal involved? DYes ~o . a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial. etc.) and amount N/ P. .../lfI I b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged -=t~ Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes Gl40 Type Will surface area of an eXisting water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ~o Explain Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes ~o Will the project generate solid waste? DYes ~ a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes DNa c. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes e. If Yes, explain 12. 13. 14. 16. iiJf'fo '. 17. wm the project involve the disposal of solid waste? . DYes SdNo a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of diSpOSal?,....~ tons/month. b. If yes. what is the anticipated site life? .:; , ) years. 18. Will prOleCt use herbicides or pesticides? DYes rsu<lo 19. Will prOject routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? eVes ~o 20. 'Niil projec: ,:Jroduce operating noise exceeriing the local ambient noise levels? ::Yes ~o 21. Will prOlec: result in an increase in energy use? If ves . indicate tyPels) DYes D/<Io -,.., If water suopiy is from wells. indicate oumping caoaCItY 2 <S Tatai anticioated water usage per dav 1 C DO gailons/dav. gailonsiminute. '" ...;..,). 24. Does projeci: invoive LocaL State or Federai funding? If Yes. ~xoiain "1fd'" eYes ~o ~ ;I - .. . . 25. Approvals Required: CitY. Town, Village Board CitY. Town. Village Planning Soard City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies . Type 2lVes DNa DYes ~o DYes ~o DYes QNo DVes 1ll1<l0 DYes Q/(o Q'Ves DNa DYes oNo ---r~'"r\ b~ Submittal Date ~ ).. 'S Jet (. , ..:::j!..J.<;}'9( ,. . C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does prop(lsed action involve a planning or zoning decisionl DYes ~ If-Yes; indicate decision required: ~ Dzoning amendment Dzoning variance . Dspecial use permit Dsubdi..rlsion Dsite plan . Dnew/revision oi master plan Dresource management plan Dother 2. What is the zoning classiiication(s)of the sitel Q.~JtQtUJ -:Qtvi.J.ztv,..CLP l"L 3. What is the maximum potential development oi the site if developed as permitted by the present zoningl IRe.. L-r 4. What is the proposed zoning oi the sitel _. What is the maximum potential development oi the site ii developed as permitted by the proposed zoningl CO, 7 _ 'CLc..ve<. o. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans I i. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classiiications . t- . - I\j- wles eN 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 'h ~~el 9. Ii the proposed action is the subdivision oi land. how many lotS are proposed? r::,qrs:.. a. What is the minimum lot size prop(lsed? ~ eN Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation oi sewer or water distriCtSI Will the proposed acti9n create a demand ror any community provided services (recreation. fire protectJon)? ~es DNo . a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~es. DNo Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. if yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? eYes 10. 11. 12. D. Informational Details DYes !Sli<i education. polic- DYes ~, CNo. Attach any additional inro""atian as may be needed to clarify your prajeC'_ If there are or may be anv aciver~ imoac:s associated with your ~roposaL please discuss such Impacts and the measures which you ;Jrooose to mitigate avoid :nem. E. Verification I certiiv that the tniOrmot:onl provided abopve is true to th,,~e.:5. oi Al,y ~nowie<:ige. .~00iic3nt" or'>iame -"'Y1-U1Q.\ Cl r1Y1Qj)1 xr-. rlLS :late Signature :\ t/ .t.. . TttIe 9-rcs If the .1ction is in the Qstai Area. and yl .He a state agency. compjete the Coastal Assessment Form beiore proceeOi with this assessment. ' ~ 4- ~ L S -.ere ~ @f]W-rT"W;5i ~ nil JtJN2519$ Ilu ~uG (it. '01 1~15t. F'. (11 . . I ~ . I !!! HAMPTON MAttRIAL.S AND HANDL.lNG. INC. I June 24/ 1996 Y.i.a FscKimile Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Souehold, NY 11971 Tel: 516-765-1938 Fax: 516-765-3136 Attn: Mr. Robert Kassner Site Plan Reviewer Re: North Fork Resources, Inc. Cox Lane, Cuechogue Dear Bob: This letter is in response to your letter/dated June HI/so that I may address the changes/additions you outlined. 1. Phase II is on hold at this time due to financial considerations; would like to proceed with Ph.lse I as per our application. 2. This item has been completed and t:he application is st;:heduled on the calendar / for review / for TueE:day I June 25 at 9 AM. 3. John at Peconic Surveyors is preparing this information and you should receive it by mid or end of this week. 4. Same as item #3. S. Have applied for permit with the New York D.E.C. for clean fill; approval from the Suffolk County Health Department is not necessary. m ~2 FOSTEj:;: AVt:NUE.. eRIOI3EMAMPTDN. NY 1 1932 2\.16 ....ACKSON AVENU~. LONG; leLAND CITY, NY l1101 is. t 61 ~3"."S25 F'AX ($ '61 S37.S463 ~ jJ~ ~ SOUTH OLD TOWN PlANNING BOARD HUG 08 .tll 1S:'St. . . P.OL I ~ ~ HAMJOTON MATE:RI....L.S ANO H....NOL.INli. INO. 6. I'm not perfectly clear on this item. Is there SomEl further action we need to take? I sincerely hope that any outstanding issues have now bE1en addressed and the process can proceed in a timely fashion. I would very much like to be given clear and definitive guidel~~es as to how we can come to some resolution and a clear indication as'to how much longer this matteJ~ will take. "~'Y' f ~ Riohard J. ~inOiPi' Jr.Jf' S2 "OS"rE~ AVENUE, BRIOGEHAM~ON, NY 1 19.32 21~' 6 ,JACKSON AVENUE, LONG ISL.ANO CITY, NY ~ 1 \ Q 1 ($16) 'S37.7~25 F"AX (S 1 6J 537-5463 . ; I I I ,_...r~ . i . . ; ! . i . 9:00 A.M., June 25, 1996 APPOINTMENT WITH RICHARD PRINCIPI JR. RE: APPLICATION FOR SALVAGING CENTER ". ~ f~ ~ ~ m@mawm nli JON, 2 0 19$ U 1/ SOIJTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ~::.-"- "-"',..--~"-_..-'-'-- . . '.,'y IdtICATION FOR A SALVAGING CENTER _ .. IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD r c. Address of Business L Y-CQ~Jh:" Partnership la..ne or Activi \\<13S Exact Type of Business to be conducted C~.~, oCt'. Slt-D~ \Mi1~i?J.~ (&w.K--&rl.2:r+ I 5~1 ~). -:kO:..~\e f"\"'\Ished ~. I am under 21 years of age Yes vi Yes V No No I am a citizen of the United States Convicted of Felony or Misdemeanor Yes No V" Number of employees to be engaged \2- ~d~ 'funL1^ J-. A~~ )<1J \ ~3c Name and Address of owner of lands and nature of the right of occupancy of the applicant to the use of such land. Applicant must file map or plan of real property upon which business is to be conducted with the following information: ~ ~ ~~(hed O'O\L . T 'I hereby certify that all the above information is true to the besc of my knowledge and belief and that I will conduct the business pursuant to the regulations set forth in the Ordinance Licensing and Regulating Secondhand, Junk and Auto Parts Activities and Businesses. I, 2. 3. 4. Location Loca tion Location Loca tion of fence required. of buildings. of streets and highways. of water and gas mains. f , ,I I, . Signa~~ /I i/ ... e of Appli . I Sworn to before me this \Cj day of5Lne 19Q1o. , (' . w. _ ,.., ',,_J1 . ij,A-/;L::.~/ ,', IJ.", -<-'-- .1"L. No~ary Pub'lic UNDA J. COOP61 Nmarl P'"blic. State of N_ Voric _ '.'io ~S::~5e3. St:~cjk ::~lJnf"JO.' ~ i '.. . . Answers to questions on p.1 of Application for Regulating... 1. Location of operation - corner of Cox Lane and Oregon Rd. 2. Reference all information from site plan. A) Existing Parking - 35,000 sq. ft. B) Proposed parking - 60,000 sq. ft. 3" . No containers necessary I materials need ground storage I pyramidal stockpiles. 4. Storage facilities as per site plan I pre-existing metal building. . ';"0 ._._,- ~--;l""'-- ~oeth E'oek Re"o"~<;;e~.,. ..I..c.,...................................................... _1I:_'oJ . ,~:--. ..._.... .................................M.n':'t.. .... . 2. ,-~Q,.a's of .~PQ.::~,c: .....~.~.?!i...~.'?*...r;.~p..'-!....~~.1;::;.i!-.gg);!~.,...j)J~..lJ.:?~.~........................... . , -: ,_ ;,.:::;;~,..; ,,-:;Te~. '~n,"'!-,' :::rr.:r"!oseo' o~erarions ....~g.B.!....:!;:Q.c;:;.~..j!9_1AJ,.g...l..~;~.~...~.u9~;:Ul.it:uo~Q. 'ce .;. --~_........ ..~_.. . ....... - ,- -,.. :- appeoved foe the crushing of concrete and natuea~ sand-stone to develpp ?rc;du'ccs"'thac" .co.iiid..b.e..s.oid..a~d...di..str;:;..:;;:e.d..~.;.;...th-;;..N~~t.h"'~';~'!~'''t;'''he 19 \ es 9:\<.+. ~ ~.'c). ...q..,-~.. .in..~. i.p..,-~~... .~.9. J:.: ...~!n\J...Jp.s:................. .......... .... ............ ...... ......................... ' We also ~ant the ability to separate and screen mateeia~s such as ston~, g ravei,...1::o!?'So-i.j;..ctnd-..c=sned-..c==ete.;.................................................................... - . --- .~. ~. ,r:a:led :i:aterr.;~::"';: :~f propcsad cperations ~~3.~~.~.~...~!.rmi t 1:0 grade parking area u......... u.. .n....... .........n..... ...n..u......n , to i~.ve,J,....::l.;...g.;:~~.~...~~...~~.~.~...f~~.~~.~~~.~e equipment 9arking and ~toea<;e and 9!;.09osed operations ::eques-eea :;y...lIr!C..."!iic.:...'~n:i:'C:1:i...qi:1."I"..c::On's:i:"S't:...af.. off g~9Q~r~y material screening and seoarations of gravel and sand f=om othe~ . . ) ob s'i'~ es':"'ThI:S---c'';!qu'est'''ij'nril"so'''ii-'!"I;;'''cc''''g'clil;i'a;:'e''~1'il!",.,r'O"~le.t:~y"'-::"Oe fu ~ '-lr' "u~la~.n<;s .chat: ,...ill be oeooosed for ~I!'~, Inc. and submit1:ed to the "'o~n a.'=. _ ..........................................T......:-.............n................ .... - - ;:,out:101d. ;<l~ ....ork and sc=een~ng' ;:'" o.e..corie..c.n...!s"i:~.~...i"t~..a:O'::"0't'1j'2Ul"Ce '.i th ap'Q~.?~~.~..:!.~::.~ .?lans.. .? lease note: :\11. copso il (Jill not: be :-amovec from - 9ramises bUC.' ~,jiTrn'5e...~ii.t....riic.o...f.:Oiing...a:..our:ti..a~.oiincm~~.e..~'er.~:ltt~"t"~rs cf -. ?coger~y to ~e 91antad ~ith t:aes and :verg~aens and seeced.. ................................................................................................................................................. J/J;;:"-~c....' - -"",~,~,.~,r~."'!,.",,,.....r '~"'".,.,..,."'''~'''''''''''''_'''''~,"""","''-'',",,,,,,w_.,,,,_.=>,,,,",,,,,",,~'~' ~~'- "_._-,--~~_._._----~ -- ---- ---. - . , -...-.,....--.- .". 14-16-2 (2/87)-7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspeC'".5 of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically eJ<pert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agenees can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature. yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: P.art 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its .site. By identifying basic project -' data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and. J: Part 2: Focuses an identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur fro';' a Pmject or action. It p~vides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. . . DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review or the information recorded an this EAF (PartS 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate). and any ather supporting information, and considering both the magi tude and importance of each impact. it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: w A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore. is one which wiil not have a significant impact an the environment. therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. o B. Although the project could have a significant effect an the environment. there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration ",ill be prepared.' o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact an the environment. therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. -: A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid ror Unlisted Actions N~~l ~~t.f1I( a~ '1:hc Name or Action :;6lLfuod .-.-- I UV\;1;\ Lead Agency ~ Name or ?nnt or Type :'1ame or Re~oonsibje Officer in Lead Agenc"! Signature or ~esoonsHJie Office~ In Lead Ag:-ency ~~\ Title or Responsibie OtTicer J~I (lArLvct7r'Lna:p I :::)lgnacure or Preoarer (It dirrerenr irom resoonsibie officerj ~. iQq(P I Dare " .~ .- . PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in detennining whether the action proposed may have a significant erfic on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consider as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additior inlormation you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invoI new studies. research or investigation. If inrormation requiring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate and spec each instance. S BUSl~ TEl..S'HONE (~ -7Sz..'s' 1?J~ l.:: ADDRESS -00.. 4Cj <;: ClTYIPOPMJ" IYl y,<;ej:f J'\fY \ IQ ~O DESCRII'TlO~ ~~ :~ ..v I jt'il I if 4~ Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. il not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project. both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: DUrban Q(,;dustrial DCommercial DResidential (suburban) DForest DAgriculture DOther (0.2- DRural (non-fa 2. Total acreage or project area: APPROXIMATE ACRE...CE . Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards. cropland. pasture. etc.) W'etland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECl) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate tYpe' acres. '1 PRESENTI..~ AFTER COMPLET1O~ ~ acre~ acres acres ac::-e~ acres acre~ acres acre: '-l acres acre5 acres acre: 2- acres ac:-e. acres acre~ 3. What IS predominant soil tYpe(si on projec: site? "Yl 1'\ ti'1 i ba..-'Y'Y"'I a. Soil drainage: S<lWell drained )c 0 % of site 'JModera[eiy well drained :JPoorly drained % 01 site b. If any agnc:.dturai land is invoived. how many acres or soii are classified within soil group i Land C:assification System? ro..;iP. ac~eS. :Sel! i NYCRR 3iOl. I ~. Are :here oedrock outcrOppings on projee: site? :JYes ~o a. 'Nhai: :5 death .::0 'oedroc!<? '"- \-'l.~" (in fee!) % of site :hrcugn J. or the' 2 '_'f?""'- ~_. '~-,,",,"O~"'_'''_'''__C'_'''~"'~--:::::::::::::::.'::''':'':::.::::::_':::'::-''''~_ .:: ::.-:-~.~ __n ~:_..:.._. . 5. Approximate percentage or proposed project site with slopes: . 00-10% 015% or greater .-- '. % 010-15% ~/-\ % % 6. 15 projec~ substantialiy contiguous to. or contain a buiiding. site. or district. listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? DVes ~o 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register 01 National Natural Landmarks? DYes Ql(io 8. What is the depth 01 the water table? t (.,0 (in feet) N::> b:..: '3~;d VVa. Uty-- ) c:::?s site located over a primary, principal. or sole source aquifer? DYes C!!!'No ~-1a.V"tI.lna..--tuj m~ 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes 1C140 11. Does project site coptain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes 000 According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land fonns on the project site? (Le.. cliffs, dunes, other geological fonnations] DYes f9tCl'0 Describe 13. Is <pe project Dyes site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an 'oJ)ell,. space ~ If yes, explain or recreation area? 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DVes fijj<io 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:(\()n e a. NaJ!le of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes. ponds. wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: (\Q/"\ e. a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by -existing p~bllc utilities? gyes DNo e \e.c..tI1 c... a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~ es DNo b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dves G1<fo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article Z5-AA. Section 303 and 304/ :JYes BNo 19. Is the SIte located in or substantiallv contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 01 the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 DVes ~o 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal or solid or hazardous wastes? DYes Wo B. Project Description '. 1. Phy,~al dimensions and scale or project (fill in di~,ensions as approPriat% a.1 otal contiguous acreage owned or conuolleo ov pro,ec.: sponsor . L b. Project ac'eage to be developed: (,1 L acres initially; Lz. L c. Project ac'eage to remain undeveloped n c" e.... acres. d. Length or prolec:. in miles: ,...~ (If approPriate) . I e. If the ;Jroje-c: is an expansion. indicate oercent or expansion ;:lrooosed T. ~umoe!' or orr-5tret!t ::1arKlng maces eXisting "'......c ; proDosed g. ,V1aXlmum vehicular ::rips generated per hour':; {uoon compietion aT project}? h. jf ~esldentlal: ~umoer ana type of housing units: One Famiiy Two Famiiy acres. acres ultimately. Iv 1"Pr %; Multiple ramilv Condominium !nltlailv L11timate!" Jlmeoslons :in :"etl oi largest .oTOoosed structure N'!~ ;,e!gnt; ~ Width: !v1p, lengtn. Une3.r fee!: or ;rontage aiong a ;::moiic :horoughrare projec: wiil occupv is? ft. ^ ~ .' -........ . 2. How much natural material (i.e.. rock. earth. etc.) will be removed from the site? 2"5) 6bO tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Q'fes wNo wN/A . '.:1- I . a. I f yes. for what intend_~ purpose IS the site being reclaimed? ~y c:;.."v"r-Q ) o\r51A"v\ I-fl.c ~ Gil..;'-.. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~es 1"'"1 No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? g{.; . . . . 4. How many acres or vegetation (trees. shrubs. ground covers) will be removed from site? - 0 -- DNa acres. 3. Will any mature ~rest (over 100 years oldl or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DY~ ~o - 6. If single phase project Anticipated period of construction ~ 0 months. (includina demolition~ 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phas~ anticipated Z- (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 (\(111 I ~_ month 1'1 q l.Jl1 year. (includina demolition). c. .Approximate completion date of final phase \)1t'l ~ month ..2:allL- year. . d.' '15 gliase'.1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~es ONe-. 8. wili"plaSdna occur dunna construction? DYes ~ 9. Number of jobs aenerated: during construction lO Number of jobs eliminated by this project Y".l'. n e. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ; after project is complete Co 10. 11. DY~ ~o If yes. explain 13. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ~o ' a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewaae. industrial. etc.) and amount t-.:JPr ".1r\ I b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharaed ~... Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes ~o' Type Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? 12. 14. Dyes ~o Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes ~ a, If yes. what is the amount per month tons b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes DNo c. If yes. give name ; location d. Will any wastes not II,? into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes. explain DVes 1Sli'l'0 DYes UJt<l0 17. Win the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes a. If yes. what is the anticicated rate of disposal? i\/~ - ~ "..,- ,r"', b. If yes. what is the anticipated site fire? ~ ~ years. ~o tons/month. 18. Will prolect use herbicides or pesticides? DYes 6Il<Io 19. 'Nill ~roiect ~outineiy produce odors (more :han one hour per day)? CIYes ~o 20. INill ~roJec: ::l(OaUCe operating noise -exceeding ~he lac:!i amcienr noise leveis? eVes ~o 21. 'NiiI ;Jrolec: ;esuit in an inc:-ease in energy use? If ves indicate :ypeis) eyes '~o ..,., : f water 5uopiv is from wells. indicate oumoing caoadtV 1, '-'''',U'' 70tai Jntlc:oar.ed water 'Jsag~ per day 1,,;""; 2"5 gallons/minute. :3. gailonsidav. 24. Does _Jroie~: :nvoive LocaL State or i=eoerai funding? jf Yes. ~xoialn 1\.4 (d' I =Ves :;rNo ~ ~=:~ . '""',._"'" - -F~">"'''''''- ,--~~~~ 25. Approvals Required: . City. Town, Village Board City. Town. Viliage Planning Soard City. Town Zoning Soard City. County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies 10. 11. . . 12. ",""_~""'~=_~""_~','_.',"" ,,"'''-C' 2)Yes DNo DYes ~o DVes lY1'io DVes ~o DYes 1J:it<i0 DVes Ql4'0 Q'Ves DNo DVes ~o . Type ',~ Submittal . Date . C. Zoning and Planning Information ~DOes proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~ -lf~Ves. indicate decision required: . ~ ~. Oioning amendment Dzoning variance . Dspecial use permit D~ubdi'(jsion Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother 2. What is the zoning c1assification(sjof the sitel Q~lt(JtUl ~.ztv,a-P I L. 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? lp 7 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? !(.o ~(.DAJ\..,f (Q..\,\ tJur L T/~-e... S. What is ttie maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ( 0 ,7_ '('LeYe<, 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plansl Q.l('es ,=:-. 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications mile radius of proposed actionl . ~ . - r\j- 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoiningfsurroundingland uses. within a 'A ~~e? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? ~ ... What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~ Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Will the proposed acti9n create a demand for any community provided services (recreation. fire protection)l ll2'fes DNo . ... If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle proiected demand? ~e5'. DNo will the proposed action result in the Ileneration oi traffic Significantly above present levels? .. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DVes -r6'N'Y'\ €k:o-~ 4l.l-'S./<1<.. . \)Pc.. -=w~ <; )/% DYes ~ Dsite plan': CPfes ::1' Dves ~ education. polic Dves ~ eNo. D. Informational Details Attach anv additional inrormation as may be needed to darify your projec-_ If there are or may be any adve~ impac-..s associated with your ;Jroposai. please discuss 5uch impac:s and the measures whic:, you oroDose to mitigate avoid them. E.. Verification -%: Date 4 - L S~l are 'J state agency; complete the Coastal Assessment Form beiore ?roceec: " e """" .; J . . 1...,4 I , ) J , .. , ,. , C::~L' , , EXCA VA TION . PLAN OF PROPERTY FOR HAMPTON MA TERIALS AND HANDLING, INC. A T CUTCHOGUE · TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y. 1000 - 83 - 03 - 4,6 , , . ~_~ca'ef'= 30' -'1 May 24, 1996 - . J ) . :: 1.:.,.- , J J - ... ) ... . ~ . (f)x.p#-~ 2R 600 cu vrfsmaterial tn he t . . HAMFTON MATE:RIAL-S ANO HANeL-ING. INC. June 19, 1996 Jl.a Pacsimile Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Tel: 516-765-1938 Fax: 516-765-3136 m rn@rn'uwrn >>l20. ill Attn: Mr. Dick Ward Chairman to Planning Board SOUTHOLO TOWN PLANNING BOARD Re: North Fork Resources, Inc. Richard Principi, Jr. Dear Mr. Ward: I'd like to thank you for promptly attending to my application at Monday evening's work session, as you knClW the urgency of my situation. Balled upon our discussion, I would like to know the Board's position, in writing, with reference to the status of my application and as to what kind of time frame we are lOClking at until it'S final acceptance. As you well know, my investigation into the former owner's site plan application uncovered information to the effect that there were five major conditions not met and left incomplete, when they should have been resolved by the J:ormer applicant. They are as follows: 1. re-grading and slope stabilization along rear ()f property to create final grade of 3 on 1. :2 . landscape plan was never designed or implementl~d 3. no concrete curbing was installed 4. heavy cracks and weed outcroppings; never a se(:ond lift or final lift of top surface asphalt 5. no fencing or location for dumpster 52 F"OSTER AVENUE. 8RIDG~"'AMPTON. NV 1 1932 21.16 ..JACKSON AVENU~. 1..0N13 1!51..ANO CITY, NV 11101 (516) !o3'1-'1525 "AX 1!i1 6) 53'1'$463 PB Rt::: L6 .9MeJP ~ i . . H......PTON ......TERIAL.lI AND HANDLING, INC. I am most anxious to gec feedback as to how the Board views this situacion, since I feel a gross injustice has occurred here to the extent of a falsely conveyed C/O. I'd like to know whether your offer still scands for allowing me eo satisfy chose conditions in a timely manner to have t'he existing site plan comply with C/O until my application is approved for change of use and newly prepared use. In addition, with reference to your quescion as to how t.he Town would benefit from me excavating the site to propos:ed elevation, stockpile elevation and location will be a1: slame grade as existing parking area. If allowed to grade and landscape the site as proposed, there will also be dust, noise and aesthetic benefits by allowing me to proceed llhen my amended site plan is finally accepted. At this point in time (Wed. 6/19), r will be submitting a revised and completed recycling permit as requested by the Town Board and I am scheduled for Tuesday, June 25, 9:00 AM for a work session with the Board in relation to said application. I am requesting that at that session a mernber of the Planning Board as well as the Town Attorney be present. r would very much like to be given clear and definitive guidelines as to how we can resolve this issue, without having to involve my atcorney in this macter. Th~f:1~: time ~~onSideration. Richard J.(}Irincipi. Jr.,/preSident S~ ~t:~n:R ;::-,V:!:Nt,,;C. ~l'<t:~C:!;;-tAM~':J~J "'JV . 2 1.1 6 .JACIC.SON AV&'NUE. I-0N13 ISLANO CtTY. t- (!l161 :;37-7:;25 ......X II!>' 6> S37-!l46~ .~ GEORGE RITCIDE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~~ .,r~ c;,UfFOL-r ~ 'r "'II" t'<:2""" ..)~. 2<:"'-... .;#0;; ~" :~a ~"0 R Cf.) =e E '!>,~ ~, ~ . ......",:) -'" S;)T" .'Y ~o./ + i-~.j ~~~,y o o PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G. WARD Chairman Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 18, 1996 Richard J. Principi, Jr. 52 Foster Avenue Bridgehampton, NY 11932 RE: Proposed site plan for North Fork Resources Cox Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Mr. Principi, The Planning Board has received your letter of June 14, 1996, and site plan application, Before the Board can proceed with its review the following changes/additions must be made: 1. More detail is required on Phase II of this project. refers to a Phase II four lot minor subdivision, but are provided. The LEAF no details 2. An application for a recycling and salvage permit must be filed with the Town Board. As of the writing of this letter no such complete application has been received by the Town Clerk. 3. Drainage details are lacking for Phase I. 4. Landscaping details are lacking. 5. Environmental form question # B 25 should indicate that the action will require approvals from the Town Board, Suffolk County Health Department and New York D.E.C. 6. Part 2 of the LEAF was filled out. This is the responsibility of the Lead Agency. .. '. o ....... .....; When the above changes/additions/ are received, the Board will proceed with its review. 7:3j; 7tio=. pl~. oon,"" <hi, omoo Qober~ ~1~ Site Plan Reviewer cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Jean W. Cochran, Town Supervisor c - - Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: m(55e.~(- Rich Prirci PI' Date: v,lltf/% Subject: North ForK:. ~e.soLlr((,s. -LJ'iC. . SCTM#: ~3- s-'f. G Comments: q P /{1r(5 ~..",-~.<;.,,..-., " i! Ii tL: J..tJ.~,I...' 4 1996 ~0'7T,~ --,-,""".1 f::\.,"'_'" -.......-.,-,., 5-t~ RIC -"'----'-~,,~~.,.._~,-,---"..~,-- --"'~'--"^-~'"--' c ~ -...I '5u.hf PB ex HAMPTON MATERIALS AND HANDLING, INC. June 13, 1996 via Facsimile gnQ First Class Mgil Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Tel: 516-765-1938 Fax: 516-765-3136 JON I 3 19oo Attn: Mr. Robert Kassner Site Plan Reviewer j j L,,~- 1. ~:. ; \-' "---_.,~ Re: North Fork Resouces, Inc. Cox Lane, Cutchogue Dear Bob: As you well know, I had my application delivered to you via messenger on Tuesday the 11th. I understand that you have a full and busy schedule, however I have impressed upon you the urgency of moving ahead on this matter in a very expeditious manner. We are saddled with tremendous hardship and implore you to take an aggressive approach to handling our application. In view of the fact that this application involves complicated issues and conditions, I met yesterday with Ms. Laury Dowd, the town attorney. She will review the issues at hand and get back to me. I called your office yesterday to possibly arrange a meeting with you and did not rece~ve a return phone call. upon visiting your office, I was very disappointed and disturbed to find that your were unable to avail yourself to me. At the very least, I would have appreciated acknowledgment of my presence. 52 FOSTER AVENUE, BRIDGEHAMPTON, NY 1 1932 21-16 .JACKSON AVENUE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 1 1 101 (516) 537-7525 FAX (516) 537-5463 c ,-." -...,I HAMPTON MATERIALS AND HANDLING, INC. It was brought to my attention by my attorney, that you recently had a discussion with the L.I.R.R. concerning my situation. I'd like to review with you the contents of that conversation. I'd like an appointment to meet with you as soon as possible. If you don't wish to contact me directly nor meet with me, please have Martha, your secretary, give me call, and I will then proceed with contacting Dick Ward, Chairman of the Planning Board, to move forward. Respectfully, ~ Ri~Jrin'iPi' ~f' cc: Laury Dowd, Esq. Town Attorney 52 FOSTER AVENUE, BRIDGEHAMPTON, NY 1 1932 21-16 .JACKSON AVENUE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101 (S16) 537-7525 FAX (516) 537-5463 v ALERlE scoPAZ TOwN pLANNER o ,/~~L;~~ :yv~ ea~. '!~.~'~ ~ 10;:. -<?\.'" :::> ;..e., ~ -;.,~ ".::. 1;; :, v. ......,'~v l~*! ~.~ ~tlJ :JL. ,.~J" ~ ... AJ-v ~- o Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NeW York 11971 Fax (516) 765,3136 Telephone (516) 765,1938 OFFICE OF TlIE TOWN pLANNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 4, 1996 Richard J, Principi, Jr. 52 Foster Avenue Bridgehampton, NY 11932 RE: proposed site plan at former Daval property CoX Lane, cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 Dear Mr. Principi, Tho pJanDin' B_d "'" ,~,ived you, I,,,,, of MaY 31. 1996, ",d ,Uo plan application. Tho B""'" i>; ,o'u.-nin' you, ,ppli~tion '" in~"",IO" f" ti" followlng reasons: 1. The application has not been signed or notarized, 2. No fee was included. 3. Information was missing on the application form. 4. Envlro_nlal f". ,u"tion , 8 ,liould ,..d "No." Tho '0"''' will ro,ulro 'PP,ov"" fro. lh' Town B""'" ",d ""Ilh """.".,., review. '.. . 5. The environmental forms are not signed. fl. Envi,,_nlal f"'" ,u"tio, , 11. Tho .ppro.." ""'.,"" hy 'ho B~,d on MaY 18, ,985, ... . oo.ditio,,", 'Pprovol. Tho ~.d1"'" of installing curbing has not been met. Thus, there is no approved site plan for your property. ~"-,""'-'-,,,......,..,..---._--...~,-,,.."- "'~...,,~-,-'~ ~. .........., ..~ 7. Numerous errors on the LEAF. For What is the proposed zoning of the "Recycling" . exampie question # C. 4. site. Your answer was 8. Part 2 of the LEAF was filled out. This is the responsibility of the Lead Agency. Finally, the Board would like to know the purpose of the "excavation site plan ". If you would like to meet with the planning staff to discuss your application, please contact this office. /15~ie~ j2j J( ~1/ ( t-l~0~. \Aobert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer Enc!. cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Edward Forrester, Town Investigator Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Jean W. Cochran, Town Supervisor ~;. ./ f""" pLANNING BOARD MEMBERS .,...., RIcHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS pLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .to: Laury Dowd, Town Attorney Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer f- FROM: SUBJECT: Former Daval Site / Mr. Richard Principi Hampton Materials and Handling, Inc. Cox's Lane Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 DATE: May 24, 1996 The attached is for your information. """"'. """" Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 c ......... ."",,, II) ,,,'k HAMPTON MATERIALS AND HANDLING, INC. May 14, 1996 via Facsimile Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Tel: 516-765-1938 Fax: 516-765-3136 Attn: Mr. Dick Ward Chairman to Planning Board ::; Re: Richard principi, Jr. Inc. Dear Mr. Ward: I'd like to thank you and the members of the Planning Board for your time and consideration, at the work session, for discussion regarding Blue Horizons (proposed golf course and club house concept) . To let you know, I am going to continue moving forward on pursuing the proper permits and requirements necessary to construct this golf facility in an expeditious manner. I strongly feel that with the joint efforts of both your local planning committee and our organization, this project will be a positive addition to the local community. In addition, I appreciate your viewing the renderings and sketch plans for our commercial site on Cox Lane in Cutchogue. We are striving to have the application completed and in front of the Planning and Town Boards by week's end (May 17) . Lastly, I wish to formerly extend an invitation to all members of the Planning Board that they may come to our Bridgehampton facility, at their earliest convenience, to view our proposed operations for the North Fork. Once again we thank you. ~ i ~in'iPi' t ~re'iden' S2 FOSTER AVENUE. BRIDGEHAMPTON, NY 1 1932 21- 15 .JACKSON AVENUE, LONG ISLAND CI1'Y, NY 1 1 101 (516) 537-7525 FAX (5161 537-5463 GEORGE RITCffiE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ,~~ ,r~.~.", ~y " -~ "'. ;::) :.::. '0 c::l . \'" oeZ ~~ · !fJ ~Q./ + i-~~ ~ ~ ---i c.: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G. WARD Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . May 1, 1996 Richard J. Principi, Jr. 52 Foster Avenue Bridgehampton, NY 11932 RE: Proposed site Plan at former Daval property Cox Lane, ~~tchogue SCTM# 100<F-3-4. 6 Dear Mr. Principi, The Planning Board has received your letters of April 24 & 29, requesting the Board's guidance in reference to the above proposed project. All activity at the site must be in conformity with the approved site plan of May 18, 1995. In order to accomplish your objectives at the site, an amended site plan application must be filed with this Board. Enclosed for your use is a site plan application. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office, ?J1-Jl~J !~XJt1. /KasstleS M Site Plan Reviewer cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector Edward Forrester, Town Investigator ~. Southold Town Planning Boat) II APrilOl996 that? Aye~lowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cr Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Principi, I see you're here. Would you like to address the Board as to what your proposals are here? [Mr. Principi addressed Board in regard to site by railroad,south of the old Southold Lumber Co., and prior Daval site, SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6] Richard Principi: Have you been able to review what I sent over or faxed over to you. Mr. Ward: Yes, I have several faxes here. Mr. Principi: OK. Mr. Ward: We have one or two questions that maybe we could ask up front. One would be that in one of your memos of April 24, you mention that you have been allocated the facility in Southold, 4 acres located on the south side of the old Southold Lumber Company. Mr. Principi: I believe that's the most accurate description. Mr. Ward: You said this was with the Long Island Railroad? Mr. Principi: The MTA, yes. Freight Department. Amtrak usage agreement and I also have a land usage agreement with them. Mr. Ward: So, you're going to get us copies of those agreements? Mr. Principi: I'm waiting for them to finalize everything. Mr. Ward: We need a copy of that and the other item was that the operation that you envision would also require a Town Board approval for a crushing operation of that type. Mr. Principi: I'm well aware of that. What I've done is, depending on the feedback I was going to receive this evening is how I was going to address moving forward with the Town Board. My question to the Board is what am I allowed to do on that site and ^.""--~~'~'~--'-'-->;'" ~~--"' Southold Town Planning Boare 12 April 01996 that particular zone, now that you know a little bit about my self and my family and my business, what am I able to do there? Am I able to get a waiver to a site plan, I'm just thinking out loud. Mr. Ward: Well, as we discussed when you were in last, to the extent of the site development that you're looking at, we would have to see a site plan. I think Mr. Kassner had given you all the elements of a site plan. Did he give you the package and everything that would be necessary. Mr. Principi: Yes. Mr. Ward: So, it would require a site plan, it would require showing on the site plan what your intent is, things that we discussed previously. So, do you have any questions on that? Mr. Principi: Yes, basically this is the site plan that I had prepared for the meeting two weeks ago, in reference to what I envisioned I could do on the site, not knowing there was going to be any difficulty. What I wanted to be able to do is, as I mentioned earlier, is being able to utilize the property, create an earth berm all the way around and be able to set up the screener for now, if thafs a permissible use, and do some stockpiling. Then graduate into being able to get a recycling permit from the Town Board and set up a state of the art crushing facility and recycling plant. Mr. Ward: Is there any other place on the east end where you have this operation that we could check into? Mr. Principi: Absolutely, right in Bridgehampton. I'm in an old mined out quarry, a sand pit, but I have the same operation as this right on the rail head in Bridgehampton, right in the middle of town. Mr. Ward: How about Southampton, are you doing anything there? Mr. Principi: No, Bridgehampton is part of Southampton Town, right near the train station. So, what I'd like to be able to do is, so I'm able to at least utilize the window of opportunity, I've got everything in motion, what would I be able to do? Am I able to stockpile and be able to put a portable screening plant in there and off site material only until I go for the proper site plan? Mr. Ward: You can't do anything on this site until, number one, you had a special permit from the Town Board that would allow for that, and then, ifs done simultaneously, with filing with them you could file your intended site plan with us. Southold Town Planning Boare 13 April 0996 Mr. Principi: In essence to filing a site plan, can I do it in two or three phases, or do you want to see the full site plan? I'm not really able to maximize the site at this time. Alii want to do is create the earth berm and be able to grade the site and set up my plants. Mr. Ward: You'd have to get into some very specifies in terms of what kind of materials you're going to bring in, what are you going to... Mr. Principi: Topsoil, sand, loam, clay, off site material, all earth made material. And then the material that's going to be arriving is clean rock and dirt. Mr. Ward: You were talking to us that you were bringing materials in from back west, the city or that, by railroad, you'd have to off~oad it to Southold station. What kind of equipment will you be putting there? Mr. Principi: Just a front end loader and a small conveyor. And a small ground storage enough for a couple of trucks surge pile and be able to move the material out. The site will be cleaned up, I'm going to do what I did in Bridgehampton, remove all the debris and all the illegally dumped material, grade it off, possibly if... Mr. Ward: Is there some way you can give us the directions, we can go down and see the operation in Bridgehampton? Mr. Principi: My pleasure, sure. Mr. Ward: It might tell us more about what you're doing than this meeting. Mr. Principi: Absolutely, I'll give you directions to the office and you can hear the plant run and everything else. What we would be doing is taking exempt material from New York, no C & D, no construction debris, no garbage, it's tunnel material, it's clean rock and dirt. We screen out the dirt which is primarily what the city is (inaudible! and we crush the rock. Mr. Ward: Will there be any structures built on the railroad? Mr. Principi: No. Mr. Ward: So the only thing you're going to have there is equipment. Mr. Principi: A caboose which will act as an office and a scale house, eventually. Right now I have the office...if everything works out I'll be able to at least use part of this building as part of my plan to be able to at least get the thing in motion so I don't -,"""""""~-"-"~--.....-~",~_._~, ,'--- ~~---~---"~~~ Southold Town Planning Boaro 14 April 01996 lose the spring and summer. My Question to you in reference to the site plan, is there an amendment or do I have to go through SEQRA, if I'm not building any buildings? If I need it just to grade the site. Basically as an extension oLI don't want to oversimplify it, I'm not trying to play anybody to be a fool... Mr. Ward: If you were to get a permit from the Town Board to do what you're asking to do, you would still have to go through the site plan process, which would be, yes, SEQRA, everybody would be involved. Mr. Principi: There are no exemptions, I mean as far as no buildings to be constructed, do you still have to go through SEQRA? Mr. Ward: Your intent here is to do a lot of mining. Mr. Principi: Weill know that's an issue...hopefully I going to request to see if I can get a modified or conditional, I not going to go below grade, just going to keep all the topsoil on site, keep all the clay on site and just remove the sand and put everything on grade. Basically that all would be a deficit because I'm bringing offsite material in. So, everything will be on grade when I'm all through. Mr. Ward: With this project, nor did we for Grim next door, there's been no waiver of site plan for this type of operation. Mr. Principi: OK. Question. In reference to, as I'm going for that, what can I do on the property now? I can't conduct business without topsoil, can I remove the topsoil and create my berms? Mr. Ward: I would suggest you don't do anything until you have approvals otherwise you're up against fines. Mr. Principi: Nothing can be done on the site? Mr. Ward: No. Mr. Principi: OK. One last Question. Did everybody review the final...! picked the folder up and I did some research on my neighbors and also on this particular Daval site. Did everybody review the site in reference to all... when they signed off for the slopes and all the conditions of the CO, as conditions on the final site plan? Mr. Ward: At this point, I don't know. Mr. Principi: Because my Question to you is, I mean the slope that was requested and Southold Town Planning BOC 15 APriO 1996 was kind of put in front for them to get the final sign off on from the Planning Board, was it a 3 on 1 slope on the outside perimeters? It's not nearly that, it's a 2 on 1 at the best. It's 45. Can I reclaim it to the condition of the original site plan? Mr. Ward: No, because if that's what it was, that's what it was approved at. Mr. Principi: You mean it says something in the final conditions, the curbing and things like that, and the drainage, and then they were signed off? Mr. Ward: We may not have signed off on the site plan end of it, but if he got his building permit... Mr. Principi: And CO. Mr. Ward: If he got his CO then that's what he was after, so I don't know that he ever finished the site plan. Mr. Principi: Oh, so that's no contingency on getting his finalized paper? Mr. Ward: It should be but in this case it didn't happen. Mr. Principi: So that can't be amended or corrected to that grade 3 on 1 slope? Mr. Ward: No. Mr. Principi: Nothing can be done on the site? Mr. Ward: Nothing right now, no. You'd have to have an amended site plan. Mr. Principi: OK, and again, what do you need for an amended site plan? Can you just repeat what you needed, I mean you need a full set of drawings? Mr. Ward: I think Bob gave you what's necessary for site plan. Your first step though, which we can do parallel is you're going to have to go to the Town Board to get a use permit. And we would certainly work parallel with that permit in processing a site plan application. You're in the process here. Fortunately you're not back west where it takes two or three years. Mr. Principi: So, I can't even use the site to bring off light material and screen on the site, right now? Mr. Ward: No, not without the Town Board permit. Southold Town Planning BoaC 16 April 01996 Mr. Principi: Because Bob brought it to my attention, if you asked what I wanted to have done, I mean you could possibly not change your use, so maybe that's what he said, it was a change of use for the building and the site. That can't be done either? You can't amend the use that's in here right now as far as storage and office? Mr. Ward: Well if you're going to use the building for storage and office, that's an allowable use. Mr. Principi: Right. And in reference to storing building materials, that's unaccepted? That's an allowable use too. Mr. Ward: Are you going to do that inside? Mr. Principi: I wanted to do it on the outside. Mr. Ward: Once you enter that, it's going to force you into site plan. In other words, if you were in a book business and wanted to have an office there and store books in the building, it's an allowable use because you're not doing anything else to the site. But you're talking a major change to the site. You're talking a totally different use that's going to require a Town Board permit to allow for it so you're going to have to get in the process if you want to proceed. Mr. Principi: So, in essence, ...1 know two wrongs don't equal a right but the work that was done on the perimeter properties as far as removing the materiaL..! mean stockpiling and doing all the site work, none of that material can ever leave without a mining permit? Mr. Ward: That's correct. Mr. Principi: So in other words, all the material generated from this site, if it's pushed up in a pile, it has to stay there or used on the site somewhere? Mr. Ward: Which material? Mr. Principi: There's a facility right next to me and there's a facility behind me, I'm sure you're well aware of my neighbors. The material can't leave the site ... Mr. Ward: Well, Grim is in the process of a site plan. There's a number of properties in there that probably precede site plan in this town. Mr. Principi: Oh, I see. A lot of them pre..cJate this. Southold Town Planning BoaC 17 April 01996 Mr. Ward: Some of those are pretty old parcels. Mr. Principi: Can you explain the process with the Town Board? Do I go in front of them just as I'm... Mr. Ward: Yes, there's an application that you pick up and fill out, there'll be a part on what you plan to do and the equipment you plan to put on site. Mr. Principi: And that works in parallel with you, ifs not going to hold up... Mr. Latham: I have a question. Pertaining to the use of the old Southold Lumber Co., do you say in this letter you have a four acre site? You're going to be using four acres of that land? Mr. Principi: Approximately ifs about 4.6 acres. Mr. Latham: With the buildings and everything? Mr. Principi: No sir, the buildings are on Southold Lumber. Ifs actually from the concrete retaining wall south, I believe ifs south. Mr. Latham: South? Mr. Principi: Yes. Mr. Latham: And you're not going to be doing crushing down there, just transferring stuff? Mr. Principi: Well, I mean, you're the lead agency, I don't want to ruffle anybodies feathers. They were cooperative with me in Bridgehampton. They let me put my plant up, my screening plant, my crushing plant. Ifs all portable. I have a site there that I own and I lease part of the site. Thafs where my plant is currently set. Mr. Latham: My question is are you going to do anything at this site... Mr. Principi: Unload and reload. Mr. Latham: Not crushing... Mr. Principi: No sir. Well, there will be a small under the car conveyor and some stock piles and a front end loader. It will be kept nice and neat. Mr. Latham: And you're going to possibly use it to (inaudible) permanently as an office Southold Town Planning BoaO 18 April 01996 there? Mr. Principi: Yes, I'm entertaining the idea. Just put it on a panel of track and set it there as an office there and a scale house, if that's acceptable. I really don't need that right now, it's not my immediate...more importantly I want to just get everything approved and in motion. Mr. Ward: Thanks for coming in. There being no further business, is there a motion to adjourn. Mr. Edwards: So moved. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: All in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Ward Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Richard G. Ward, Chairman . Martha A. Jones Secretary "'"..".... ~ -rf> ,.."'. --- .' ..., HAMPTON MATERIALS AND HANDLING, INC. April 29, 1996 Via Facsimile Qlld ~ Hand Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Tel: 516-765-1938 Fax: 516-765-3136 Attn: Mr. Dick Ward Chairman to Planning Board WK 3 0 1996 Re: North Fork Resources, Inc. . I ! f.~_o__ I LM...".... Dear Mr. Ward: Subsequent to our memo dated April 24, 1996, which was faxed to the planning board, the following is what we hope to be able to do with our facility on Cox Lane in Cutchogue. We wish to grade the parking area to level of grade to help facilitate the parking and storage of equipment and proposed operations which will consist of off property material screening and separations of gravel and sand from other job sites. This work will also help to prepare the property for future buildings that will be proposed to the Town of Southold on behalf of N.F.R., Inc. All work and screening is to be done on site in accordance with approved work plans and all topsoil will not be removed from the premises, but will be put into reforming a burm around the perimeter of the property which is to be seeded and planted with trees and evergreens. In addition, we would like to begin work with the crushing of concrete and natural sand-stone to develop products that could be sold and distributed on the North Fork to help establish new business for our company. Also we have the capability of separating and screening materials such as stone, gravel, topsoil and crushed concrete. We thank you for your time and consideration. 7--11- R 1- Richard J. principi, Jr., President 52 FOSTER AVENUE, BRIDGEHAMPTON, NY 1 1932 21-16 JACKSON AVENUE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101 (S16) 537-7525 FAX (516) 537-5463 :L.it~ uS '81 !'~:'S.j b P. U 1 ') pe, 1<:1:;: -r.-~ -r-: fflr^,Y lis.. 1'~\ r; f[il -RI-TI' '-;'\;-7 fl-~ I fi I [!; 1IJ l!: I. \~ I r~ " ! I,..) r"~"-'--~'''''--''~''';;''~'':' . i APR 2 5 1996 HAMPTON MATERIALS ANO !-IANOI-ING. INC. FAX COVER SHEET DATE: 4/24/96 NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER 1 COMPANY NAME: Town of Southold ATTN: Mr, Robert Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer FAX NO: 516-765-3136 TEL NO: FROM: Richard J, Principi, Jr. REGARDING: North Fork Resources, Inc. Cox Lane, Cutchogue **************..*~**********~****************w*~*.*r*****~** Mr. Kassner: AS per our meeting yesterday, I wish to formerly request a review of what work we can perform on the above prop",rty at this present time, in accordance with local zoning and planning laws and conditions. First and foremost we wish to request permission from the Town of Southold to use the upper level of the vacant acreage for outdoor storage of of=-site material to be screened/sifted (not crushed at this time). Our objective is to be a productive member of your co~nunity and we are in the process of amending the existing sit'" plan in compliance with the Town's request. We would appreciate your responding to us in writing a;; soon as is conveniently possible. We have financial obliga:ions to meet and we are all a~~ious to move forward. Th~or y;;2 time and consideration. Richard J. dnciPi. ~1' S2 FOSTER AVENUt!. 3RIOGj:HAMPTON. NY 1 1 9~2 ~ I \ ~ .. ...) "PB 'Rt::. P."~ I: 'BD#D -r.t'rTr'l V:S J U rl 08' 0 1 I ~ : S 1 "'AMPTON MATERIAL.S ANO ...ANOL.lNG, INC. r;1 ") , I'i 1.,:\.; r:IJ 25 u u APR 1995 FAX COVER SHEET DATH: 4/24/96 NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER 1 COMPANY NAME: Town of Southold ATTN: Mr. Robert Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer FAX NO: 516-765-3136 THL NO: FROM: Richard J. principi, Jr. REGARDING: North fork Resources, Inc. Cox Lane, CUechogue ********~************.******~***~*************~~*~.~**~<<~*** Mr. Kassner: We wish to inform vou that we have been allocated the facility in Southold (four acre site) located south of::he old Southold Lumber Company. We intend to use chis sie,= for bringing stone products into our facility at Cox Lane a:~d for shipping crushed products that we intend to develop at our facility for markets back west. Our intention is to use chis siee on the railroad for l'Jading and unloading and possibly some seorage of our products. There will be no offices constructed or office trailers sieuaeed on this siee. We are prepared to clean-up and maintain the upkeep of:he site while we are there. Thank you for your time and consideration. 'i~ ,Qi~~ f 52 F"05TE~ AVENUE:. SFifIOGEHAMPTON. NY 1 1932 HAMPTON MATERIALS INC. RECYCLING AND HANDLING CENTER _~_ _.....~~ ....r___~...~ . ", ~~-I!'. I, . i ,. "'..It1 ,-, I' I ,II' .". - #- ....- - - ~~(e"(r "' -I>) tei . .L.L' {5C ~~_ ENTII""n' EXlf .>. EXIST1NG stORAGE BUu.olNG ... ..~.'. ,~.~. ~i ,1\1 ~ f "'if! . ,f.. J OREGON ROAD LEGENlJ 10 (/ ~ '(>~ 1- 65 == 1~~~~~~~r~R~~~I~[~:~E 6S , , .' I " , " , , , , " . \\ \ \ .n- 6" WELL DUST CONTROL i I I 1 I I 1 1 I , 55 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 -- '-- " PORTABLE SCREENER ./ I I 10 I I : Ornri~"-' i,~CD' I 5~ I I leD I I I I " I " " " OPERAnoNS'yARo '.... '- - ....--- .54 8OlTOM Of BERM ? ..., ,; -;: TOP OF BERM ~ -- --~-------- HAMPTON MATERIALS INC. RECYCLING AND HANDLING CENTER AT CATCHOGE-SOUTlI HOLD scale D'IO' 2'" - 66 I 57 ~ . . . o . ~ i . o g ~. ------2!f'" . " o ~ < z 8 . o z 1 4~N t" ' , \ " "" '\ ) I \ ( . ~ " M j i ~ ~< ~ ,? L ,:, , ~'IJ 1!. _. ( "... "r . i' '. : iA"; ., ~- J~ -~~,:' w () Z <I: a: I- Z W Z <I: :::! \ ., , ." v ~ ~ j l ~~ ~ ~" , \ .' . c:( ..J >< o u z o w U Z c:( a: I- z W \ 10 t:, I. 'j' (, I,:! ,0 ~<<__ c a: z o C) w a: o :!: o a: LL. == !!:! > (0 ~ ::! a: w co " ...... o a: ~ o 0 LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans . r , SPFile Tvoe: Proiect Tvoe: Site Plans Status: Exoired SCTM # : 1000 - 83.-3-4.6 Proiect Name: North Fork Resources 1996 Address: 8595 Cox Lane & 12820 Oreaon Road. Cutchoaue Hamlet: Cutchoaue Aoolicant Name: Richard Princioi. Jr. Owner Name: North Fork Resources. Inc. Zone 1: AoorovalDate: fJ/~ SCANNED JAM 1 0 2008 Records Management OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicatas that we have received the related Infonnation End SP Date: Zone 2: Location: SC Filina Date: C and R's : Home Assot: Rand M Aareement: Zone 3: SCAN Date: x'06 in N 2W°17'16" E 482.15' 1. I L SUMMER - \ BRff£ZES F i i TO I - 7 LU Q LEGEND . _ RET '— LONDON A AMERICAN PLANE.iRFP5 a.�� NdQo F?�T - - - — — - h hbp l' IF,so TQF PIRWO y9p�WT P TY�gg4' /IL - ` 4."AF' FlN�ii IT v _ (p a. . AMY ,� � NORWAY 5PRUCE 1t� 6 FZENnN6 A - _ 6 r NI6N Omit LIW E1.'M6B OON SOVIN ANO VEST SOM OOP PPOPE*Y I 6' CHAIN,LINK FENCE I \ 0111111111111 w- � � 11 ; <I1. i r i 5 30°1250" W 551:'75' - - 4-4 J I o o s - - C �a SURVEY OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY SITUATE AT COXLAAT CUTCHOGUE i - - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD EDGE OF PAVEMENT EL.Ss7or ,- .:- ;.-_ . SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK CONC MON. I/,/,/tnp/ - - , S59 531 E�47672 - 4 n w 71 _ _ — - L _ _ _ _ - - _ S.0 T M. DIST. 1000 SEC, 083 BLK 03 LOT 4.6 j- EL.53.13' _ CONC.MON \( � �O� 'V -� A 25 12 0 26 60 76 100 125 750 176 200 226 \ v 52 - \ SCALE: 1 =50' DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, 2001 $ , Cx%(wPi - 54 CERTIFIED TO: RICHARD J. PRINCIPI f .I 2002 \ 1STORY h ---- METAL FRAME I I _ _ WAREHOUSE FJOB N0. 2001-325 MAP NO. 218.0' 1 I 1 1 ,,,,, 200.2' _ A 55.6'_ I FILED. COH I ERED _ _C ; REVISIONS: ; CONC PIAffOPM 161pE�iAiN- �� rpi^, ' COVERED I /� O' - ti aoec C2_ % °�ANDs° ASPHALT I ; � Pg91fING PASA I LICENSE NO 0,50363 - z - - - �i� ANDS ON SURVEYING Il 46 NORTH ROAD / '�,r SII a =p �o HAMPTON BAYS, NEW YORK ; 11946 _SO j / �/ / II . 0 U �� TEL/FAX. (631)-723-1954 �p y0f MARTIN D. HAND L.S � - zCC m � / - - � I Of o LOT AREA: 265,608 SOFT. =6.097 ACRES �PK' '"-°. ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO FIVE EASTERN TOWNS TOPOGRPAHIC MAPS '9^9 OEM" - NO SURFACE WATER EVIDENT WITHIN 300' R3��"°5 _ I \ I 1 I / I / I \ I II I 31 °ate A I r CLSERM \ � - - - - -_ 15'TO2o',wmEEaaTffaEaM _-_ _ -__----- _ -4P - :.; r -LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF -- - _ _ _ -- � - - - - __ - � -.•. 1 - - - - - _ - JEANNE M., GRACE - -- - - - - - a DONALD J. GRIM _ y r., YAR 19 20O3 '4q Southold Tori , ManflTnx B03r3 _ _ .. .. a,_ - - _.._ a. --„-. -r ,.�.. , -. , ,,,;,v,: , .;. .. - _ .. ,.m -nrF4}T"FT? 'Tn^ '— giR„'q^,"', rv,-,Y q .-,.—.. . .., ^ „ _ --. -,� _.. ... . .... ... . . : f , ^'";^.",F ^' ,✓`, .,r . ,Wry•.' ' :1T_ "c-a. ;T?sn 11 � I _ , ,\ _ _ _ .T W, 1 _ - , _ _ . (r , _ : - _ : _ - 46 .. _ - -. ,. 'I` , - - _ - ,�_ ., - - :' _ v, _ _ ' _ , y__' _ _ _ . - ,, _ . - I . . - t „ _ f V I 1. _ _ - , ' - . ,. T k 1 -. _ \ � '` 59.G 53.4 S qr 'S I /sir-'1� - �•i^ ^-�� `4\ fees� .�\ - 1 _ . . � �` BfJ9'ec/ /+iG fps y�Ji� a�° C[a/i�}i• . ''J. "� G fIAF' ;.' . I '— I III �� S: "i9'S5'3f " E. , "� 0 -N /, _ . g 2t;� _ _,- - - - -�� �7"� m 0 awel4' Y" iD��, / \ L J r` <v r.- 5 - . ' \ - - - - - - ,�\ - . ,,r++a1 1 f,7” .iwde 'I''/V @' 1 / .I 7 ­ 1 k7!F'` - mdr, - er.'�t5u yf„ l l'- \ s e fpm/ `\\ i ��\, _^, ..",�-� \1 \ \\\ \\ \`3 wr9A'; •, - F a' :. t - o.r. ' o ''Ieaii � -, , - Sbvf".?,*� _ - . . 'LOT ' CO ' / .\ . I -- 1 \ "�'� I g4i.,m ,, -�•-, C.2 l- .-,-+ : -�L - ,T� _ ,- - _ .�qr. ,.� - i I ` .. .� \ C yr \- r p1 TPTAL ARBA ' - 6,p9'7 Acres 265,585 agrN. / .1, 1 _ � - 1` �' /PI G 1 ''1 t j 1 I � I v ' -_ 3, , C �e $+ _A's " - - - - , J k. I", i I � I 1: v 42 A� B4fLD1NG . = .F2,046 sq,11. �4L5-% . 1 I I I I 1. . ,l% . ' , - ,^, o (� � 11 l 'CQ p G . i i 1 LANDSCAPING _ 1G%' TEST HOLE I I /. \ yrq�f / ' P' 1 - – 1 I I _ I / 1 l ei�ri>s l� et}' :E, i -t,I I ,;. r :i�- '5 2 �' OFFICE 200 salt :5 - 7 .\ \ \ \ I i _ _ , _ S70RAGE N,'BOO sq.H. . _ SANDY I / \ - _ , LOAM I I / - k _ / � \\ \\. \ \ - r ' i. i 5'W .2o 61'b!�'✓ � - .S 2v{ ,p,x IL'71 '1*44,tQ i o,0:� I , l '3 ,y.. . �* - , ,'Pr4RI1'NHC� R,�'Qlip�°L�IYTB ` z I. * ��I �� ���� r vvJo�rh ' 4.�k gIR0,00a' 1W , o' � • SANG i - -. !- T � :� , :. - - / +k }ya STORAGE FfCE 2001100 sq.fl. 2 _. - ,� �~ E'�' of t � '� !� / ,--I-,-- VEL ( 1 G \\ ., \ -N , --- !—. ,_ — . 1/,SOOKQ'ODsp./t. 1F . — —^- — _ ORA I /� �t \ - ORAGE �,Q /'\ \'I\ \I ��. p' i`- 1 In SPACES SUPPLED l6 i / �-+� '' \I i I If z..; -- I % a l x' '� ARiAA'i6gE,E n• I i . _! 11 i i / �. \9 . I STY. CORRUGA TED BUILDING l �E A'R€V1 6.097 Acres I 1 \_, I , ' ` �� I I / (Exasfing') / - c =1 d,5O i i i \ 1 , < r I 1 = 2.5 � ' L$I � e k i / l . t /' 1 I I / jr 0= Ao1. \ / = 6,097 x 0.5 x 25' x 2B = 10500 cu.N. 11 }7�� f I / �\ 2oo.r 1 % i05Vp 68.4 = f$3V.F,%f2 = 13 I V / A y A I / 1 PROtflOEE 13 I.P.s 100 12 deep or equal I4) • , - 1 - I I q 1 I I \ I - - - 1 tii i I 1 I i PROVIDED 13 fps 100 l2',deep 2 exixFfng 1p.$ I I , I I /1 v , ' I I / 1 � ` I I \ i - . l 1* LIGH00 0 \\\ f `I II I I + j II - r \ i e �4�rI,Jr. 51 3 // ��.\ fig - EX1STiNG .. 1 / f 1 I I I g / / \ � 1 ` I I f . ` r 1 1 ----SP--- -- / - / . I I _ w / o-ofp —112 Z6AA>w'�dG 06MC71 LI \ \4 f/ f I I I � \ tee. acr� I // I—,--x_ ' r. 1 I I I \ �& e' t. " / ------ PROPOSED USE + WAREHOUSE 8 MATERIAL StORAGE t\ 1, ( - \ / Id I 1 \ Tr- a /! /. ,k _ SCHOOL pfS'TRICT, 9 \ F„ \ r r, I \ - W , _ ti '�. FfR8 DisTRIC.7 29 - \ , \ ' I I I ,fir F.. _—_ — __ »---Q-- ---- --t,� • /� 11 _ - sb , . "I I \ I I I 11 i I 1 I � // / r i:/ T �� ' � At�RCdG{�fVT ' 11, v` I j I _, " A l I - - v V t I /? j y/ ��� 55/E � TEJ.R 'A EJR. \ \N. 1 I \ Q -S �I GZ xr / ' / K i \\ �� '1 . I I- ' 1 ---- , / \ PfDf�ENAMPTON. W Y., ff932 ± II \' Ill``�, " . I 1. _ I , , I � / / TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION ' ` , , .1.., I\\ i I ( 'L`+. X / 5 1` / n � ! x' �; \\\ v : \� CASTING £4EYATfON' S/'3' o.o \\ I I I . 9 - - I I Il,'. //I r i.r .AII,` fF, .\1 \i ^� I - PRO6XIS'TING CONTOUORR e s .54 ---- - ` \\ L _ I 1 - - II I` ,' \ �� PF F D.CONS Z f If' F " �� A A1s' + wu FACJq. v u rr��'11 1 * G t / : I / - a •�_ �1 �4i M'DAF, AW SPR cE a Al,t ORW rF I 13 ID �z M Fr 11 f \ SPR 5 T - yy ycu�A 11 rm G)SG NT. 11 I _ SkOUas 4 . 7 J .r � \ 'IB�RM'�I'C�"BE`PL'AN''i�p WIrF1'1,YRARNJ$ r ,� 1 - r:,, < : . " -- - - `- --' - _ .+.r- - - 'ice_ +-�..,=rT77 _ \. I r f `1 _ :', - r . , .. . : „ � j�.�, \ - ., r k -r - , _„ e •. i« . r ».. `'it,i, �_ dk 1: H,.rx? y \ �q> "hrF',' 17. ,. ��Is �/,� . „ , r . : t . . .- ' .. , jr 3. l .. 'r _ ,r F- t {tilt u, ... : .',.. "r •} �J . r .. a ". : . , - ,. - Y v. F, _ 1- ++E ..+ rt .k 5 . X �. i �. . � r Mi . 1. �i., , � _ , �. r4i' n .? �. ...� A r. .n r (fAr, ,. � r. " .._ l Y I r-M �t 1I "'a .. /r'r. , k , A rn .n , -.i W 'uRva .w,:n'; ,k:- $ i r �_ r 2 . �. irl � i : ., r}. _. i .., s . ,1 , e , ' - ,1' 'r: ._ p ..I"11: ., -'..� ' . r r � .,, r a ,� , ., a .' ., ., � y� ., _ o r ., . ' ,r_+ w' _V 1. 11C'w a fi °^Y' l u . �, ' u. - _ A r. r _:. ..f. 11 , , , , ._ _- .. ,� »,,,�,1: .r . 'e „ � ., ,'_:: -;, r.., .,, ,, nay .�t -L ` f µ . r n • .. '. .. � .L r _; _ r _. .1 s r v r„ . ., ., ...♦ . :. _ . .,,_ av, ..}I' Y '!, ia', �,', Z � y , � .. _ ... r .- . . .._ n-. , 1 rk..h r-r* rSw . , x . . ,'� - � .' t. '� , r . , . i'r. .. S - r, : , r .. , , v , . n,. t Pr , t- ,:. ., . . r 1.. .A.. r. h . r _ , . , r ., . y�LpyR ✓ ,I , i 2 _ .' � 4 `L -0 - X� i.. � i _ ". :. 3., � "; �, ., r- . c ;�,.. -ia , :. :,. 1 .4 F ! "�Il r3 r r. 1 J 4 - �' r _� :'. '.k r,,. � .. r{ a . :v^kx � {p,,. ! H . r4 _ •. _ . I ,+' •, r \ r. f �f � ,.�,> w. xr, V' v. . 4, :. r .. ., .', 4 -. � - _ � . : .. _ r. - P '. a .. ,_d \. : e. ',+ .�. .-. , i \ :m Vit' {. 1" '.V. .. . .b r d .. : „ _ r _ _ i'. . , .e� 1 �,ry�A"" JL, 4 k 1.: rg0. { .@ drr . �'✓ r' 11, t ya y / F'Y 4Y I 1 f i t ASS+ h . i..- AI _ A _ - i: l :, : , _ f f' v , 'r r rn1 I ,r' � , �. I I " �_. _ ,,,,. . _ fiF- 'p / 1 f1. / i C�FFai: I 1 ; n �1 '� . f X f. .� ' � ff I /f / rtr . r,, f . // I x $ f * ; / / . - . . 1' \ r � ' f 1 ' - / \ �I _ h I `\ a 1 r1 I I r \ -4 2 i \ . W i - ( tr 0.t 4�r 10.- 1 S � o r Q. e � ic - � , \ mI , ' I . i v . <a - - --- -y — . ky o �� J / '► - _ ! 1 V ,_: Z , ` --- -- --- ---- - -- - No T � SOK E, 0UC5N " y __ " / _ -� -_ t = � � a A T CUTCNOOU� ��' " ;- s TO N %lei — —SOUTHOLD ,r � _ \ FOLK COUNTY, N. Y _ - \ MW '- 83 - 03 - 4.6 \' x- 0 01 11 t��, *.5%4 -\ \ v_ \,,� ,e ; ` Sole= �. _ 0 su . 0.0 � . (� / , � \ \ . July 127 199E \ \ \ 4 A L4 /99G f-ovls,,on . �' ` 9 % J � I vim) V y k. ?r ' x' ' fo' w, a vegfa filvfs brrf�m� t k x * Pr'a . 'ti,- Cr. tilrow. 7Y3Fs ." - MI ' M ..X 1F - \ #, r * � �,L h6,4.7 ,ro.•wa -C E ravor ' / 'v/�- k , ' 1q it x _- x '*1 - , �"" * A 4 � o �f -�.-w�--•-.' '- )1"' }_,J ' �' 1 a '�--.-;.-.--,.*✓.X' \ *i, ' � ,o� " 'y ��'^-'^.-� - - 'kYPt arra , et, � - r - _ l Y no 2 N. 59° 5;: W. �� - 513.96' '. iii;; AUG 291996 1u�r ., I. ; , m. . r `, a 5111 iJ'J, E-40 �. r/ I I . 1-1 , \ I � � I , \ �N!O/� DONALD 1 _ \ IL, q A — °� ,,, ` y . _ MpFLJMREMENTS EOR PRVEQ PANG ARFPAS \ lana aFfo + I6 p c Nag sa ns �111k y111 ° "' /,,,I/f'., 191°MAtT ", ° , ,, . „ \ - - . - . , ,r ,. - _, - ✓ \ ' , S Nq $,1R' 9'TANfp:F,ZEm`L' A'Cf"@D -9A$E ,, ` 1 7- - • 11 11 -I'll .. - , . - i P, , sr' w'"evet err , " -1 Icarts < - . rnaL'a, re r. , iFa , r r. t, ; k .?I 1 71 C DF?A/NAGE 't,�'�k r - .,. a . 4 N 1000(,- 83 -02 11.3 /000 - 83 - 03 - 02 / JOSEPH C, HANNABURY HOWARD ROSENSTONE \ 8 OTHERS ' APT. IOA BOX CU HO 334 W. 87 sl. 1935 GUE, N. Y N. Y., N. Y. 10024 11935 \ 1000 83 -02 - 12 /p,Op - 83 - 03 - 3.1 FRANK OLIVETO & OTHERS GREGORY & SUSAN BOYD /000 Ol-. 3Lt 1000 - 83 - 03 - 3.2 - 9 HEMLOCK PATH P.O BOX 4/3 - 8960 COX LA. KI ANTONE & GERALDINE P7R� JEFFERSON , N. Y. CUPCNOGUE, //9 P 0 35 P. BO NORAON B14CCULLOG III .O. OX 1097 8200 COX' LANE CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 1/935 CUTCHOGU , N. Y. 11935 cox's LANE o Q 1000-83-03-08 1000-84-03-1.1 JOHN DROSKOS l PRIME PURVEYOR , INC. l 1640 MAIN ROAD LA,URELWOOD PECON/C, N. Y 1195 DRIVE LAUREL, N. Y 1/9'48 1000-83— 03 —4.6 IOOO-8303-4,7 ROY SCHELIN . ' ' X 0, 85 - T L'�: $6 U. IaC. Y I; TOWN OF OUTHOLD 1000 - 83 -' 02 - 13.1 ZUHOSK1 FAMIL Y ASSOCIA TES 11825 OREGON ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 119$5 _ 1000 - 83 - 03 -4.5 DONALD GRIM P.O.' BOX 300 280 DEN-KEL LA. CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 1000 - 83 - 03 -5.3 ALEX ZUHOSKI RFD. # 2 11900 OREGON RD CUTCHOGUE, NY, 1/935 KEY MAP NEW PROPERTY st t. me FO9� A T CUTCHOGUE a TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY — t ^� LIC. NO. 49618 JULa2 j� 1000 — 83 - 03 - 4.6 i" = 100'r� rare°r6s - P.c. P. 6. 90X 909 f(/l�/ G9, 1Q�p 76 .". 1230 TRAVELER STREET { n -. SOUTR0ID, N.Y. 11971 t d l Cox 5� 4 53,e, L A_ N � , ' SITE –' , • _ 53 G I , ' , 53,4 + 6 - sri9AZJr map/esA —3--_car G - SAS a,r mo-A/Or r KEY .MA!' S. 59.553/" E. ti .-' 7 L✓ _ C _ \ 47� 72' Sca/e, f" = 60,0' „ / vo•r w/a4e lve•ypa.foaf/vd Jia.%hely'!I. �` :�., � o $2_.sp�s i s' — c.r. --! . ° + "� _ _ srnQ� LOT COYERA'L�'E- \ /d 5 P X �� XVWA Ce 5 � AyTOTAL AREA = 6.097Acres 2165,585 sq,N. � A> BUILDING = 12,046 sq.fl. 4.5% U J LANDSCAPING = /8% TEST HOLE I I / \ /o. /•p ' Ir O ,O v S E" � r I /'P ° TOPSO/I I i - - - II / I \� / ol/ .o \ f i al I 1 1 ref 53,z ,5 I f /� �� \ \ I / I 1 � � C.Z $ AP f7 C.*-' // 33.'� I® OFFICE 200 sq.fl . SANDY I / /r \ \ i STORAGE 11;800 sq.fl. LOAM r I / r \ \ \ \ \ 1 SH 2U00 YwIISW 2v6f,S:� l I oroc. �lv' chw/n Z,/ok n/ier+ce A s/Awes s \ y 947 PARKM REOMEWWTS SAND I � � WITH X� \ 9111' gat j �4'q° fi OFFICE 200/100 sq.fl. 2 GRA VEL STORAGE 1/,900/IOOOsq,ry. 'l2 \I \\ \\ rl SPACES SUPPLIED /6 rQ I STY CORRUGATED BUILDING k ORAft4GE ARF-4 = 6.097 Acres i 57 i / lE tfslfngJ c = 0.50 O / i = 2.5 I // I ( 0= Ad. 6.097 x 0:5 x 2.5 • 28 = 10500 cu.Il. 10500/68.4 = 153V.F./12 = 13 , 1 1 I I I \ � T PROVIDE /3 1.Ps l0� 12 deep o� equcf PROVIDED 13 l.p.s /00 12' deep + 2 exisfing I.p.S �� � I it I i I � � j � � . . • .a �r v � LIGHTIMG ® t/ r5/.3 ® 3 / / 5a �L r EXISTING \ \ ' -' � I I � - - _ • , _ a _ p/mss � , ,-� k -- ZOANYG DISTRICT.• Ll PROPOSED USE -, WAREHOUSE 8' MATERIAL - STOWAGE -,{c SCHOOL DISTRICT: 9 FIRE DISTRICT 29 APPLICANT: RICHARD J. PRINCIPE, JR, S /7 Q r l / 52 FOSTER AVENUE / f ' V BR/DGEHAMPTON. N. Y. 11932 // jl Q Q V m E' FJ l TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION \ / �\ \\ I e x / s / 'n f ! r `\ EXISTING ELEVATION 563 g I Ill /v! � . �' 1\\ \ ``.\ PROPOSED ELEVATION e/ 50,0 / EXISTING CONTOUR - - e� --- PROPOSED CONTOUR ----s® 71F I I I / ,•, _ I' 1 1@ -?. r , . \ [� SUGAR'94PLE 2112'- 3- CALIPER' ' ;I I I, M1k OF {yWITF PINES WHITE CEDAR, MIX "'r'6 AF E 3'' HCT. 'd'I'EO.SPA'UGE•'s� 'W7',QE r _ 4r \ ALBERT-A SPRl1c 4' HT. . �'' • . \, Ql 1 I' \ // -_ -- -- _ r -_-_ .-- - .-...-.- f. I I I .1 ` 1\� 1 SERM TO OC PLANTED 60M VARfOUS &HRW 4W v v` a . - -- ♦ �" Y 1 i, ., 1.. > - I . f f. , b;I c. _r _ i - eH- 'S' k,. ..FIs r� v , a ' A+✓ ♦l ;r [ . _ yam � � Y . � "^ � / ,,l ' .,�. ( � _ '1 w, ` -r� Mp ps d a4 crushe" iJJ G y� _ � 11 i 11 - __-• _ , r � _ `� \ 1 1 ; X V h I Ga•3 , y SITE F'LA'N FOR o r a e 41 NOR TN FORK RESCUR l�'�:. _ I A T CUTCHOOUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD� 1 SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y �- 1000 - 83' - 03 - 4.6 1 Scale: l" = 201 p fff.57Pit Judy 27, 1996 a / / (�'�, * ,o' wiaea veg rta five M b�ffar PrAcwo)T 4 ,, S ',..G�fa+n * k Co4�.7 Wa Co.VE ron cover S �`5.-- a �- �- a 'k :►.. ,� . y ✓(' .�'. - , 11f' I _.+?' , �'.' ] � � M � ' . '�.' �, �t. X *U �j�'� t�we �.7bs ..! N. 5�' 55' ,31" W. \ v . I \ � $ N101F \� DONALD ea G H UTHO G%DAN ><„ MIlOUN REOU/REMENTS 'FOR PA VEP PARKING AREAIS 1. \ a N Nt mcPru ,f c� Muchho stedaea - - f- M2" ASPHALT $'f"ABILIM ;COMPACTED .BASE' - - tl9 op . DR?A'N�� LEAt'�VG'POOL ` ' .r'1'-ai�MW, ,v. .. '_ ,:,....__ . ..d ..' - ,:a- .:..•LL ,...:.! '1._ • . _ ..__..,. :. _. .- � .. _ ._ - _. . .+.Wf..-.. y. . .... . ._. - • , .. -._ _... .. _....e _ . .,_- .a.. . _ .,u....a_:..k_L...._ .,__. _ _ _. ._. .__ _._ a-....,_. _ ._.. , . .., ..._ a., .r- _. , ...c_ ' -_ .. Y a nx . n ANY ALTETU IILW F A001770N TO TS SCRNEY IS A N/OLA77aN OF SECTION S C7 TV Nk7 YORK STATE EALL ZIONU?T LAI OfUr_�/ C HMON�VALD FOR THS AAV V CORES�TN KOFOF OALYTF ---- - - C O /X , V - - Il L A N E J - \ SAV MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE WO01 SED SEAL QF' THE SL,tVEYCW 1*12W SI TOM APP&4RS so 4 - _ ---- I - az 6 l-- - / - ' • - -- \w\ A�IOAIALLY ro COMPLY NY�SAAID LAW THE MAW ALTERED BY' ITER E LOW BSL DYANY '8��LTERNB S�AS UTXMM CTEO MD , - - T-T»•MTE'ARE Mor N COMPLUNLE om THE LAW. S. 59' 55' 3/" E – – 475.72' 51 1 _ a w o ¢ d e d I II it •_ — \ � 1 / ` �� \ \ / � 1 V ' w 0 o d_',s �vf IQ _ — -- – – r e m a l 'vn o STY. CORRUGATED BUILDING 6Dh / N,N \ �; I • V 15557] E h 54 V / h t p a V 6 m 'e, r1 t - .� �� 54, 58 SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY COMPLETED MAY 10,1996 ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS ARE REFERENCED TO FIVE EASTERN TOWNS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP INFORMATION. LIJ J s / � .- ' �- d Tr a/ g e a r! ,e o r 'L4 EXCAVATION Lu PLAN OF PROPERTY \ e ; FOR d r p 5 e J HAMPTON MATERIALS AND HANDLING, INC. o ss TOWN AT NOF SOU HOLD aI , SUFFOLK 88' 3N4 sN. Y. ' o /oSCe3IB yii = 301001 z May 24, 1996 I I h I i a- , � JUN 14 q96 sOOTNOLO TOWN 1 \ PLANNING BOAAO as 26,500 cu. yds material to be a� 3 excavated � Qo � � \ ZONING DIS TRIC T Ll l 5� merroF 9y N .> 59' S5' 3/" W. 513.96' o a.m'v „ ao AREA = 6.097 Acres j 7` 1 I II1ti o- S. LIC. NO. 49678 N/O/F DONALD GRIM 6� c rolls, P.C. INS) 7�rr>i ss - solo aoo e �ELV? SrR eT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. ll91 96- 148