Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-143.-3-18outhold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 13, 1986 Mr. Robert Celic P.O. Box 1247 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site Plan for Robert A. Celic Dear Mr. Celic: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, February 10, 1986. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site~plan for Robert A. Celic located at Marlene Lane, Mattituc~, for construction of an addition to the existing building to be used for office/retail use. Survey dated as last amended October 10, 1985. This is subjectto the following: { 1. A one-year review and inspection prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. When the Chairman has endorsed the survey, we will forward one to you. It was noted that this site plan received variances from the Board of Appeals, certification from the Building Department, and a waiver from the moratorium by the Town Board. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M.Schultze, Secretary cc: Buildinq Department Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 January 7, 1988 Mr. Robert Celic P.O. Box 1247 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site Plan for Robert Celic at Mattituck Dear Mr. Celic: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 14, 1987. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board reco~mmend to the Building Department that a certificate of occupancy be issued for the site plan of Robert Celic located at Main Road, Mattituck, SCTM# 1000- 143-3-1, subject to eliminating the designated parking on Marlene Lane. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN'9 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD NEW YORI~ STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Region 10 Office: New York State Office BUilding Veterans Highway, Hauppauge, New York 11787 Building Department Gentlemen: We have no objection to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the located at the above noted site. -.,/,--// //~' Re§lo'hal ~erm±~ F.n§inee~ Region 10 HRT: rd Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 November 10, 1987 Robert A. Celic P.O. Box 1786 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site Plan for Robert A. Celic Dear Mr. Celic: As noted in the minutes of the October 19th Planning Board Meeting, the Building Inspector has requested, for safety reasons, that the fence in the parking area bp guard rail construction as per the Highway Specifications. Namely: Galvanized steel (flex-beam type) 12 gauge, eighteen and one-half inches in width on a 4" x 6" x 7' CCA .6 treatment, posts shall be spaced twelve (12) feet on center. The Planning Board concurred with this request and also requests that upon completion, an as-built site plan be submitted. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD dms DATE October 20, 1987 Wickh~n, Wichkham and Bressler Hain Road PoO. Box 1424 Hattituek, NY 11952 Attention Daniel C. Ross Gentlemen: Southeast Corner of Route 25 and Marlene Lane~ Mattituck Site development plans for property owned by Robert Celic Realty at the above noted location have been reviewed by this office. Inasmsuch aa no driveway directly onto Route 25 is requested at this location, this office will require only that the partial back filling of the state property between the highway and the permittee's site be completed, that this area then be seeded with grass and that concrete curb be installed approximately ten feet off the edge of travelled way across the entire frontage and do~n Marlene Lane to the permittee's curb cut, as shown on the attached drawing. A fee of 827.50 will be required as will a performance guarantee. The permittee should contact this office with regard to the latter. Very truly yours, ORIOiNAL SIGHED ~ Hz. R. THYBERG HARRY R. THYBERG Regional Permit Engineer cc: Town of Southold Planning Board~ Attn Valerie Scopaz HRT:JS Planning Board Page 1 8 10/19/87 Mr. Ward: We could approve it subject to. On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning board approve the % site plan amendment for the Site plan for Robert Celic located at Mattituck, SCTM # 1000-143-3-1 for construction of a fence; subject ~to: 1. Recommendation from the Highway Superintendent for location of the curb on the Town Road, Marlene Lane. 2. Fence to be guard rail construction at the slope. Split rail fencing is acceptable at other areas. 3. Receipt of an~.as-built survey. Vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards The Cove ~SCTM # 1000-8~-~20 The Board reviewed correspondence in the file from the Mr. Henry Smith, President, Southold Town Trustees. It was noted that the Trustees had met on the site. The Chairman read the letter which indicated that the buildings were behind the jurisdiction of the Trustees. It was discussed that the letter was not clear with regard to the site plan and which plan was referenced in the correspondence. Mr Joseph Fishetti, owner/developer was present. He agreed that the letter was not definitive and that the line ~hould be m~rked on the site plan so that the Board knows where the wetland line and line of jurisdiction is. He stated, however, that he would have to prepare a fQundation survey after the foundation has been constructed. ON a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site plan amendment for The Cove, SCTM #..1000-87-5-20 located at Main Bayview Road, Southold , subject receipt of a definitive reference from the Town Trustees to a specific site plan an~ date as to where the wetland line is. Vote ~f the Board: Ayes: Orlowksi, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded b~ Mr. Latham, it was'" RESOLVED that the So~thold Town Planning Board approve the lote line change for Angelo Accardo Subject to the drawing Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 August 31,1987 Robert Celic c/o Celic Realtors Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site Plan for Robert Celic at Mattituck Dear Mr. Celic: Enclosed is a copy of the correspondence received from the New York State Department of Transportation.with regard to the above mentioned site plan. The Planning Board will review your site plan amendments upon notice that the State's requirements have been satisfied. If you have anylquestions, please don't hestiate to: contact our office. Very truly !/ours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board enc. ~ICHAEL J. CUDDY ~gus~ ~i, ~'~7 STATE Of NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HaUPPAUGE. N.Y. 11788 RECEIVED BY $ Ul aDI ' ,. .... FRANKLIN E. WHITe COMMISSIONER lis. Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Town of $outhold Planning Board Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Scopaz: Robert Celic Realty Route 25 at Narlene Lane Hattituck Messrs. Pagel and Youngman of this Department were pleased to m~et with you on August 11, 1987 regarding the subject site plan. Our field inspection reveals that fill has been graded onto Route 25, paritally covering guide posts in the area. These must be removed since they constitute a danger to errant vehicles. We will require installation of curbing and sidewalk along the property's Route 25 frontage. We note that the subject driveway is causing excess water to run onto Route 25. It is not our policy to accept drainage from a private development. For us to review the matter further, we will require three copies of detailed site plans including the following information: A. Location and dimensions of existing highway pavement, curb, sidewalk, median, median openings, guide rail, utilities, traffic signs, right-of-way lines and property lines. B. Existing and proposed buildings and appurtenances. C. Design features to be incorporated in proposed construction or reconstruction: 1. Width, pavement type and thickness of driveways. 2. Radii of driveway returns and other points of curvature. 3. Driveway grades or profile view of driveway. 4. Angle of driveways relative to the roadway center line. 5. Dimensions of roadside control islands and driveway medians. 6. Dimensions and alevations of curb and sidewalk relative to the edge of pavement. 7. Location of authorized traffic signs and proposed advertisement signs. 8. Existing and proposed pavement markings. ~s. Valerie Scopaz August 21, 1987 Page 2 D. Existing and proposed drainage features: 1. Size, type and grade of driveway culverts. 2. Highway drainage structures. 3. Direction of surplus water flow on applicant's property. E. Distance from each existing and proposed driveway on the site to: 1. The nearest side road in each direction if within 1000 feet. 2. The nearest driveway on adjacent properties. 3. Streets, roads, or driveways opposite the site. 4. Adjacent property lines. F. North directional arrow on each applicable sheet. Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plans and/or figures cited from Part 302 of the New York State Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. We will recommend any necessary lane closing restrictions. To allow for snow and ice control along the jobsite by State forces, the contractor shall schedule his work in accordance with the following: No drums, cones, barricades and other traffic control equipment shall remain in a location where they will interfere with or be disturbed by a snow plowing operation. The work must be scheduled to afford the safe removal of such devices when necessary. Drainage frames, grates and covers shall not be adjusted in a travel lane unless the final pavement course is placed prior to the onset of snow and ice weather. Steel plates, etc. shall not protrude above the adjacent pavement. If any of these protrusions exist in a non-travel lane prior to a snow and ice condition, then temporary asphalt ramps must be placed so that for every one inch of rise, there is a six foot run of ramp. He Details of internal traffic circulation, parking, traffic control devices and any proposed additional pavement lanes or widening. For major projects involving such pavement work, the plan sheets must be standard 22 inch by 36 inch size and placed in the order specified on page 21-3 of the New York State Highway Design Manual. Oversize sheets with cluttered or illegible information are not acceptable in any case. Ail submissions must be prepared by a licensed professional engineer, architect or land surveyor. These must be sent to Mr. H. R. Thyberg, our Regional Permit Engineer, at the above address. Upon review of this material and resolution of any outstanding comments, the necessary Highway Work Permits will be issued. Ms. Valerie Scopaz August 21, 1987 Page 3 We welcome the opportunity to work with your office and would appreciate receiving copies of any site plan abutting Route 25 and 114. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very trzuly you~sJ Regional ~raffic Engineer TCH:JH:JS THE HOME SAVINGS BANK June 22, 1987 Mr. George Lessard, Executive Building Inspector Town of Southold P. O. Box 1179 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Lessard: I had a pleasant conversation with an inspector in the build- ing department this date, regarding property I own on the Main Road in Mattituck. My property lies east of Bob Celic's pro- perty which he is in the process of altering. My problem is that I wind up some five feet in the hole since Mr. Celic has raised the grade. Assuming that all commitments will be met as to sodding, planting or whatever the slope to prevent flooding on my side, nevertheless the manner in which the alteration has been completed, and the resultant change in natural ground eleva- tion has resulted in an eyesore which may or may not be hazardous, as time will tell. I would assume that adequate protective measures will be employed to prevent vehicles going down the grade, since the occupants of the adjoining house have small children, and cer- tainly any chance of an accident should be averted prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy on the property. I am writing this as a matter of record, since I think a situa- tion has materialized that is not in the best interest of the community, and at the very least abridges my rights as an adja- cent owner. Yours truly, Roy C. Schoenhaar, P.E. 029903-1 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MEMORANDUM Planning Board Members Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner June 23, 1987 Attached letter I strongly recommend that the Planning Board request of Bob Celic an amended site plan showing the new grades of the parking area and the ramp to the basement, along with provisions for parking spaces to make up for those lost by addition of the ramp. S I~~TY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 11, 1987 NY State Office Building Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppague, NY 11788 Attn: H.R. Thyberg Dear Mr. Thyberg: As per our conversation on this date, I am forwarding the site~plans that we discussed. The site plans for the Friendly Restaurant and the gas station of Sukru Ilgin are adjacent to each other. The applicant in the Celic Site plan has put fill in the area between the property line and the existing paved portion of Route 25. May we have your comments on these matters at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your assistance. V~a~lUy .truly yours, Town Planner dms enc. Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 14, 1986 Mr. Robert Celic P.O. Box 1247 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE; Site Plan for Robert Celic at Mattituck Dear Mr. celic: Enclosed is a copy of a signed survey for the above mentioned proposal which has been approved by the Planning Board. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAi~RMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M.Schultze, Secretary enc. O TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR . P.O. BOX 728 TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL. 765-1802 January 28,1986 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Subject: Site Plan~-Robert A. Celic revised map dated 7/19/85 Gentlemen: On January 21,1985 the Zoning Board of Appeals under Appeal #3422 granted a variance to the entrance/ exit requirement under Art XI Sec 108-112(D) for this proposed development. This will certify this site plan in meeting zoning regulations. Yours truly, EH:dsm Edward Hindermann Building Inspector ITEM SATISFIED SITE PLAN REVIEW North arrow, scale, date, tax map number property boundary, dimensions, and angles, key map easements and deed restrictions names, locati6ns, and widths of adjacent streets land use proposed, zoning, ownership, certificate conformity with comprehensive plan of discl°si!i Impact on environment: land use transportation community services and facilities environmental as to air, water, noise energy conservation historic preservation environmental impact statement existing, on-site physical improvements Proposed development: grading, and drainage plan buildings and other structures proposed improvements such as parking, storage, loading areas~ vehicular and pedestrian ways including ingress and egress outdoor lighting and public address system outdoor signs landscaping plans ; 25 % of lot coverage architectural plans buffering Natural features: location of wetlands and areas subject to flooding existing contours at intervals of 5' or less location of trees with a diameter of 8" or more measured JAN 23 REC'O $outho Town Boord of ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3422 Application Dated October TO: Mr. Robert A. Ce]ic P.0. Box ]247 Mattituck, NY ll952 25, 1985 (Public Hearing 12/12/85) [Appellant (s) ] At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on January 2], ]986, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your .,[ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [×] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article XI , Section ]00-]]2(D) /' :[:] 'meque~t for Application of ROBERT A. CELIC, Box 1247, Mattituck, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section lO0-112(D) for permission to establish access to and from Marlene Lane for off-street parking which will be located less than 50 feet from property abutting the Main Road, the nearest street intersection. Premises located on the east side of Marlene Lane, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map District lO00, Section 143, Block 3, Lot 1. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on December 12, 1985 in the Matter of the Application of ROBERT A. CELIC under Appeal No. 3422, and -' WHEREAS, the board has corsidered all testimony and documentation entered into the record concerning this application, and it is noted that no public opposition has been received; and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question as well as its surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: 1. The property in question is situated along the east side of Marlene Lane (a/k/a 10200 Main Road), Mattituck, and is more.parti- cularly identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 143, Block 03, Lot 001; 2. The pr~mises in question contains an area of 31,451 sq. as certified by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C., Licensed Land Surveyors, site plan revised October 10, 1985, and is located in the "B-I" General Business Zoning District. ft. 3. It is noted for the record that a, Waiver under the Provisions of L~cal Law #14-1985 (Article XVI, Section 100-160) was granted by the Southold Town Board at a Regular Meeting held October 22, 1985 deeming such use as proposed to be consistent with the uses in the pending Master ~)an Update Zoning Code revisions. 4. The subject premises is improved with a one-story building (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWOI DATED: January 22, 1986. Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Page 2 Appeal No. 3422 Matter of ROBERT A. CELIC Decision Rendered January 21, 1986 presently used for a real estate office and beauty parlor with a setback from the westerly front property line at 7.5± feet at its nearest point, and set back from the northerly front property line at 80 feet at its nearest point. 5. Abutting the subject parcel on the south are premises located in the "A" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District, and on the east, premises also located in the "B-l" General Busi- ness Zoning District. 6. By this application, appellant requests permission to establish access to the proposed parking area which commences at a point at the northeast corner extending in an easterly direction (as shown by site plan of October 10, 1985). 7. Article XI, Section lO0-112(D) requires that no entrance or exit for any off-street parking area be located within fifty feet of any street intersection. 8. Although the state owns the property between'this parcel and the State Highway, which is shown to be approximately 70 feet north of the ingress/egress point, the access to the proposed parking area will be extending at a point extending southerly from the highway's blacktopped shoulder approximately 55 feet to the northeast corner of these premises. 9. It is the opinion of the board that the point of access under consideration to the parking area is the same area presently used for parking and would not be a direct change. In fact it is the intention of the applicant to eliminate "backing out" onto Marlene Lane by creating this entrance/exit access point. 10. It is also noted for the record that a conditional setback variance under the requirements of Article VII, Section lO0-71 was granted on February 14, 1985 under Appeal No. 3311. In considering this application, the board has determined: (a) the relief requested is not substntial; (b) there will be no substantial change in the character of this district; (c) the relief as granted will not cause a substantial effect or detriment to adjoining properties; (d) the circumstances of this appeal are unique; (e) the interests of justice will be served by allowing the relief as requested; (f) the relief requested is within the spirit and intent of the zoning regula- tions. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT a Variance as applied under Appeal No. 3422 in the Matter of ROBERT A. CELIC for permission to establish entrance/exit access to parking area(s) as shown on site plan revised October 10, 1985. Vote of the Board: Ayes: (Members Goehringer and Sawicki was duly adopted. Messrs. Couglass, Grigonis, Doyen. were absent.) This resolution lk CHARLES GRIGONIS, CHAIRMAN PRO TEM January 22, 1986 JR. JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 October 25, 1985. To: From: Re: Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Waivers granted by Town Board on October 22, 1985 Attached hereto are the following waivers of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 which were granted by the Southold Town Board at their October 22, 1985 regular meeting: Ruth Enterprises Walter and Marilyn Gatz Joseph Lizewski 125-127 Main Street Corp.  ClbertM. Citelli, Jr., DDS & Vincent M. Claps, DDS A. Celic Also attached is the resolution denying a waiver to "280 North Road", and a letter to Dynasty Packing Inc. relative to the Board's inaction on their waiver request. Attachments JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, S3095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (S16) 76S-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, Joseph Clifford Cornell, on behalf of Ruth Enterprises, has requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application presently pending before the Planning Board and the Building Inspector, and WHEREAS, Joseph Clifford Cornell appeared before this Board and explained the. nature of the uses for which he proposes to use the premises in question, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to construct a new build- ing to house three business offices, and WHEREAS, this'Board deems sbch use consistent with the uses in a Limited Business District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine & Weiner, Inc.~s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, '- . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant be and he'hereby is granted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 to the extent of permitting such uses On said premises as set forth in his application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board for a site plan and the Southold Town Building Inspectol for a buildi'ng permit, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisdictior thereof. 4:~-Judith T. m~-~r-y~"- ' ( Southold Town Clerk , JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK C) OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa¢ P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 ~LEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang, on behalf of Walter and Marilyn Gatz,has requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board and Southold Town Building Inspector, and ~ ~ WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang appeared before this Board and explained the nature of the uses for which he proposes to use the premises in question, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to construct a restaurant and business offices, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such use consistent with the uses in a Limited Business District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine $ Weiner, Inc.~s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant be and he hereby is granted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 1~ - 1985 to the extent of permitting only that which is allowed in the Limited Business District on said premises as set forth in his application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board for site plan approval and Southold Town Building Inspector for a building permit, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisdiction thereof. ith ¥. Terry Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa¢ P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELF~PHONE (.516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang, on behalf of Joseph Lizewski, has r~:-q~ested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. lq - 1985 with respect to his application presently pending before the Building Inspector, and WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang appeared before this Board and explained the nature of the uses for which he proposes to use the premises in question, and ,~ WHEREAS, this Board funds that the applicant proposes to construction a racquet- ball facility, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such use consistent with the uses in the R-q0 District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine & Weiner, Inc.~s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant be and he hereby is gr~nted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. lq - ;1985 to the extent of permitting such uses on said premises as set forth in his application presently pending before the Southold Town Building Inspector for a building permit, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisdiction thereof. Judith T. Ter~y~~ Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall~ 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEE'I~ING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang, on behalf of 125-127 Main Street Corp., has requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application presently pending before the Building Inspector, and WHEREAS, Garrett A. Strang appeared before this Board and explained the na.t~re of the uses for which he proposes to use the premises in question, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to constructing a wbrehouse building with an office, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such use consistent with the uses in a Light IndUstrial District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine g Weiner, Inc.~s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicasnt be and he hereby is granted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - !985 to the extent of permitting such uses on said premises as set forth in' his application presently pending before the Southold Town Building Inspector for a building permit, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisidiction thereof. Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK C) OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road: P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTNOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22, 1985: WHEREAS, Alfred M. Citelli, Jr., D.D.S. and Vincent M. Claps, D.D.S. have requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. lq - 1985 with respect to their application presently pending before the Southold Town Plannin~g~ Board fora. site plan approval, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to construct professional office buildings, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such use conssitent with the uses in a Light Business District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine S Weiner, Inc.'s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicants be and they hereby are granted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 to the extent of permitting such uses on said premises as set forth in their application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board for site plan approval, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisdiction thereof. Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 5:3095 Main Roa~ P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 22. 1985: WHEREAS, Robert A. Celic has requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application pending before the Southold Town Planning Board and Southold Town Building Inspector, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to construction an extension to his real estate office building, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such use consistent with the uses in a B-1 District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine 8 Weiner, Inc.~s Master Plan Update Zoning Code revl SlOnS, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant be and he hereby is granted a waiver of the provisions of Local Law NO. 14 - 1985 to the extent of permitting such uses on said premises as set forth in his application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board for site plan approval and the Southold Town Building Inspector for a building permit, subject, however, to the applicant obtaining any and all permits and approvals required by all Town and other governmental agencies having jurisdiction thereof. Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLEP~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Roadl P.O. Box 728 $outhold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 2.2, 1985: WHEREAS, John C. Tsunis, Esq., on behalf of "280 North Road,, has requested that this Board waive the provisions of Local Law NO. 14 - 1985 with respect to his applica-i tion presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board, and WHEREAS, this Board finds that the applicant proposes to construct a retail shopping center, and WHEREAS, this Board deems such us inconsistent with the uses in the R-O District as proposed by Raymond, Parish, Pine ~ Weiner, Incds Master Plan Update Zoning Code revisions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the applicant be and he hereby is denied a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 14 - 1985 with respect to his application presently pending before the Southold Town Planning Board for site plan approval. Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa¢ P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516} 765-1801 October 25, 1985 Capt. John M. Dulemba, Pres. ¢ C.E.O. Dynasty Packing Inc. Box 699 Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Dulemba: The Southold Town Board at their regular meeting held on October 22, 1985 failed to take action on your application for a waiver of the provisions of Local Law No. 1/4 - 1985 in light of the fact you made no application to any Town agency prior to the enactment of Local Law No. 1/4- 1985. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 16, 1985 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Robert Celic Site Plan Dear Mrs. Terry: As per your request, enclosed is a copy of all pertinent information from the file for the above mentioned site plan. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. 0 stat tqg uts, :R altorm MAIN ROAD and MARLENE LANE MAIN ROAD P.O. BOX 786 P.O. BOX 640 MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952 GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 516 - 298-8000 516 - 477-9400 October 11, 1985 Southold Town Board Judith Terry, Town Clerk Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Gentlemen: I am herein rRquesting a waiver of the provisions of Article XVI regarding the moratorium outlined in Section 100-162 & Section 100- 163 of the Southold Town Code. The plan entitled "site plan for Robert A. Celic" was originally submitted in February, 1985 and is presently awaiting certification by the building department. This plan has been reviewed (numerous times) by the planning board and is a request for an addition Go my existing building located at Main Road and Marlene Lane,Mattituck. ~ The proposed zone in the master plan remains the same - "B-I". I would appreciate a "'go-ahead" so construction can begin before winter arrives. Thank you for your consideration. ~)~: ' cc: Southold Planning Board JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 October 16, 1985 To: Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department From: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Re: Request for Waiver, Local Law No. 14 - 1985 please submit all pertinent data in your files pertaining to the waiver request of Robert A. Celic. ¢lic · ¢h¢ ¢altor MAIN ROAD and MARLENE LANE MAIN ROAD ~t['CEiVED P.O. 80x 786 P.O. BOX 64O MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952 GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 i~ ~6 '~ 516- 298-8000 516- 477-9400 October 11, 1985 Southold Town Board Judith Terry, Town Clerk Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Gentlemen: I am herein requesting a waiver of the provisions of Article XVI regarding the moratorium outlined in Section 100-162 & Section 100- 163 of the Southold Town Code. The plan entitled "site plan for Robert A. Celic" was originally submitted in February, 1985 and is presently awaiting certification by the building department. This p~an has been reviewed (numerous times) by the planning board and is a request for an addition to my existing building located at Main Road and Marlene Lane, Mattituck. The proposed zone in the master plan remains the same - "B-I". I would appreciate a "go-ahead" so construction can begin before winter arrives. Thank you for your consideration. cc: Southold Planning Board ~.o % TO D Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 10, 1985 Mr. Robert Celic Main Road and Marlene Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site Plan Robert Celic Dear Mr. Celic: The Southold Town Board has recently adopted a moratorium on site plans in B,B1,C, and Cl zones, which became effective on October 3, 1985. Therefore, the Planning Board cannot take any further action on the site plan known as, "Robert Celic" until authorized by the Town Board. Enclosed is a copy of the moratorium for your review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board' dms en'c. 7 ~ T LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 August 23, 1985 Mr. Robert Celic P.O. Box 1247 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site Plan for addition at Mattituck, NY Dear Mr. Celic: Enclosed is a copy of correpondence received from the Building Department regarding certification of the above site plan. As you, can see, two items need to be changed in order to meet the certification requirements. Would you please amend your surveys so they can be certified, in order to finalize your application. In order to expedite this, you can bring the surveys directly in to the Building Department so certification can be made. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. TOWN OF SOUTItOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR · P.O. BOX 728 TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL. 765-1802 August 20, 1985 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 SUBJECT: Site plan Robert A. Colic Revised map dated 7/19/85 Gentlemen: Tho subjoct promises is in a B-1 zoned district and the oxisting use as shopping center is permittedt by ~ S~i~l E~tlw~ by th~ ~ '" Zva;-d ~z (~-~ VII °^~ ~ 7~ a ..... ~ ..... +~ ~- -~" yard iz ~' 0". The location of ground sign scales to approximately 3'-0" from property line--a 5'-0" sot back is required. (Art VIISec 100-70 C (2)) The driveway exit as shown is within 50'-0" of corner intersection, this is not permitted, Art XI Sec 100-112 D. In view of the above, this site plan can not be certified in meeting zoning regulations. EH:hdv T LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 August 14, 1985 Mr. Robert Celic P.O. Box 1247 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site Plan for Robert A. Celic Dear Mr. Celic: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, August 12, 1985. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site plan of Robert Celic for the construction of an addition on the existing building at Marlene Lane, Mattituck for use as office or retail. Would you please forward three site plans indicating an asphalt~pavement i~ the parking area. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. ~ery trul~ Mour~%.. a ' NNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M.Schultze, Secretary cc: Building Department Robert A. Celic PO Box 1247 Mattituck, NY 11952 April 2, 1985 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Benny: Attached please find a revised sketch plan for my property in Mattituck which is currently under consideration before the Southold Town Planning Board. With reference to your letter dated February 6, 1985 which recommends the narrowing of the proposed addition as well as connecting the two parking areas, I believe that the new sketch plan and the attached Southold Boa~dof Appeals approval dated February 27, 1985 will help remedy any concerns the board may have with these issues. The major problem I have with the recommended sketch plan as outlined by your board is the total elimination of our present parking spaces. Upon examination of the board's sketch a proposed buffer area projecting into Marlene Lane is recommended. As you know, the town owns this road and I can not legally improve or otherwise alter land that I do not own. In order to more clearly understand what I propose and to arrive at a satisfactory s~te plan which you and the board require, the following observations and comments may help compromise this situation: 1) I have checked with the Southold Town Police regarding past traffic accidents at this site - they have not had a single accident report in over 25 years. 2) Marlene Lane is an established area and any appreciable traffic flow increase appears remote. Traveling motorists are aware of this building and the cars which "project" out into Marlene Lane from the hair dresser (southern) portion of my building. High speed travel is uncommon due to site's nearness to Route 25. 3) Numerous clients of the hair dresser tenant are elderly and disabled with no capacity for walking long distances. They are therefore either "dropped" off as close to her entrance or park as near as possible. To restrict "adequate" accessibility to these clients would be financially harmful to my hair dresser tenant as it would be to my own "future" landlord leasing status. (con't.) Page 2 (con't.) Total elimination of the present parking spaces would limit my ability to rent the present real estate office area which the hair dresser has already expressed serious interest in. The retention of convenient and safe parking in front of the real estate office would facilitate my future rentability problems. 4) With the new sketch plan parking space area allocation is far greater than required by the current town code. As you can see from the "colored" site plan, I have eliminated the "problem" parking area in front of the hair dresser. I would install curbing as you requested all along Marlene Lane where indicated as well as posting "NO PARKING AT ANY TIME" signs at proper~distances on the boundaries. I appeal to you and the board to please accept the continuance of the present, most-important parking area in front of our real estate office as part of the site plan approval. It should be noted that the present area can accommodate 10 vehicles whiIm the new sketch plan voluntarily reduces capacity 50% to only 5 vehicles. Finally, I would like to comment that my expansion plan (in it's completed form) would be an asset to Southold Town and would create no traffic control problem for the Mattituck community. In fact, it would substantially improve the overall character of the immediate business area. I love this town as much as each and every board member and with five children and a lovely wife behind me I assure you that proper planning for my site is as much of a heartfelt concern for me as it is for you~ My future is my family's future. I await your serious consideration of this hopeful compromise. Robert A. Celic RAC/self Southold Town Board of Appeals ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 33ll Application Dated November 29, 1984 (Public TO: Mr. Robert A. Ce]ic P.O. Box 1247, New Suffolk Avenue Mattituck, NY ll952 Hearing 1124185) [Appellant(s)] At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on February ]4, ]985 the above appeal was considered, ~nd the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 2B0-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section IX] Request for Variance to the zoning Ordinance Article VII , Section ]00-7], Bulk Schedule [ ] Request for Application of ROBERT A. CELIC, Box 1247., Mattituck, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII, Section lO0-71 for permission to build addition with an insufficient rearyard setback from the easterly.property line, premises~identified as 10200 Main Road {and Marlene Drive), Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map ,Parcel No. 1000-143-3-1. WHEREAS, the public hearing on the appeal application of ROBERT A. CELIC, Appeal No. 3314, was held and concluded on January 24, 1~85, at which time all testimony was taken, in%luding written .opposition from an adjoining property owner along the_southerly property line; and WHEREAS, the board members have each viewed the premises in question as well as its surrounding area all-d-~'~-~' familiar with the cha..__racter of the immediate zoning district_s; and " .... ~HER~'~S',' ~'~'board made the fJ.llowing findings of facts: 1. The prope~t~ in question contains an area o~ 31,451 sq. ft. and is located in the "B-l" General Business Zoning District; 2. The subject premises is known as 10200 Main Road at its intersection with Marlene Drive, Mattituck, and is more particularly identified as District 1000, Section 143, Block 03, Lot OO1; 3. The subject premises is improved with a oneJstory building presently used for a ~eal estate office and beauty parlor with.a setback from the westerly front property line at 7.5± feet at its nearest point, and set back from the northerly front property line at 80 feet at its nearest point; 4. Abutting the subject parcel on the south are premises located in the "A" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District and on the east, premises also located in the '!B-l" General Business Zoning District. 5. Article VII., Section lO0-71, and Bulk Schedule of the Zoning (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: February 27, Fo~ ZB4 (rev. 12/81) ]985. CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN Z,~ BOARD OF APPEALS m Page 2 - Appeal No. 3311 ~ m~ Matter of ROBERT A. CELIC Decision Rendered February 14, 1985 Code requires a minimum 'sideyard-setb~ck of 25 feet and minimum rearyard setback of 35 feet for a principal structure; 6. Applicant has requested permission to vary the easterly setback to 18 feet for a proposed 2,750 sq. ft. addition, extending 43± feet easterly from the northeast corner of t.he existing building and thence extending northerly 45 feet (30 feet northerly from the northwest corner of the existing building); 7. Applicant Planning Board for Section 100-134 of has a proposed site plan pending before the consideration of the elements required under the Zoning Code; ~-~ ' Also, in considering this appeal~ it is the opinion of the board that: 1. The relief as requested is .not substantial in relatiog to the zoning requirements since~ th~ parcel in q~estion is a ~.9_rner lot a~ de¢ined by Section lO0-13) and as Such, ~ec~o~~ 1uu~l~ a~(ows a ,yard other than a frontvard to be deemed a side y~rd.~ which is 28% ota variance from the 25' requ~rementj--op u~-~meu a rearyarok ' ~ ~. ~ne proposal is consistent with the exis~in~ character o~f the use(s) established, ano there wil~ be ~o substantial chan~e in the character o~ the 2oning district, since the addition is proposed for expansion of the present use(s); 3. There will be no effect on population densit~ and thereby will not effect availab'le governmental, tacilibies; 4. That in view of the manner in which the difficulties arose, justice will be seKyed by allowing the variance aPPlied. NOW, THEREFORE, on motion by Mr. Sawicki, seconded'by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that the relief requested under Appeal No. 3311 in the matter of ROBERT A. CELIC for permission to construct addition with an insufficient setback from the easterly property line at 18 feet, BE AND HEREBY IS APPROVED AS APPLIED. Location of Property: 10200 Main Road (and Marlene Lane), Mattituck, NY; 1000-143-03-001. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Mes.srs. Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. (Member Goehringer abstained from vote.) This resolution was adopted by majori,ty vote. lk CHARLES GRIGDN~, JRY, Chairman February 27, lg85 Pro Tem [ i - IF3!. Z ~'7) to'd. Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 6, 1985 Robert A. C~lic P.O. Box 1247 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site Plan of Robert Celic Dear Mr. Celic: The Planning Board reviewed the above mentioned site plan at the regular meeting of February 4, 1985. Enclosed, for your review, is a survey map with the Board's recommendations regarding this plan. The Board also had the following recommendations: 1. Narrow the size of the addition in the east/west direction. 2. In doing this, connect the two parking areas. The Board noted that the configuration of the addition would change slightly, however, the same square footage could be used. The Board's main concerns are that there be off-street parking, that there be curbing to control the entrances, and that there be no backing out into Marlene Lane. If these changes are agreeable to you, please submit six copies of the survey reflecting them for the Board's review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours BENNETT ORLOWSKI· JR., AIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Board of Appeals L J'anua~y 2~ 1985 Jean E. Vitale 225 Marlene Lane Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 Board of Appeals Town of $outhold Hain Road Southold, N.Y. 1~971 To ~hom it may concern: I am ~rriting this letter in concern for the request of a variance. Celic real estate agency has applied for a variance for insufficient rear yard set back. ! am not under objection on his addition as it is closer to the main road. I am under the impression that the addition is to be used soley for real estate lmrposes, and that there will be no added sewase or wells. I have had several problems with my well water as it is and l do not need anymore. I am severely objecting to what Hr. Celi¢ has done to the lot adjoining my property, vhen he cleared the treed lo~ he created an eye sore. He opened the lot Joinin~ ~siness proper~y for parkins a~ such ~o residential housin8. The ~rees blocked his bus,ness closin8 off sight of the ~in road,- now I have to look a~ the unappealins back of ~. Celtcs business and the hideous piles of sarbase from the house behind ~e off~ce. Nov I ge~ all the litter f~om the ~in road and su~roundin8 areas mentioned above. I do: ~t like ~e facts that n~ ~is proper~y ia a parkinS lot a~d I thl~ that ~. Celic is obliBa~ed ~o put a fence up to.block ou~ this unpleasen~ v~ew he has created for me. : I would appreciate a response. CC~ celic r~al astate sta. t¢ lgcnts' .Inc. MAIN ROAD and MARLENE LANE P.O. BOX 786 MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952 January 7, 1985 MAIN ROAD P.O. BOX 640 GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 516 - 477-9400 1985 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Gentlemen: With regards to the letter dated January 2, 1985, addressed to you by Mrs. Jean E. Vitale, the following explanations will hopefully answer her comments: 1) As you know, the new additionunder law must conform to all Suffolk County Board of Health standards regarding well water and septic system controls. Mrs. Vitale is therefore automatically protected. 2) This parcel was cleared of all tree growth in 1983 due to the constant "root blockage" problems we had experienced in our sewer lines. It should be noted that the tree clearing was done at considerable cost to me and fortunately has since eliminated all blockage problems. 3) The property is zoned B-1 (co,~mrcial) in it's entirety and has been maintained as such for well over 25 years. 4) The buildingwas completely painted (rear included) to "spruce up" it's previous appearance. Although tb~ rear portion of the building does not face the highway, it was painted primarily to express neatness and care to all surrounding neighbors. 5) The garbage which exists to the East of subject property is not my doing. It belongs to a tenant of the adjoining ow~mr. I don't like the litter any more than Mrs. Vitale and I have even called the owner to see if he could have this problem resolved. Our lawn is littered as much as, if not more than Mrs. Vitale's. 6) Upon my pozchase of this property I gave Mrs. Vita]e permission to plant a pine tree "shielding" line on the Southerly most portion of my property. This buffer has since been planted and taken root. 7) I have absolutely no objection to Mrs. Vitale placing a fence along the Southern boundary of my parcel· I did not zone this property nor any of the surrounding properties (the Town did) and should therefore not he penalized for it by being required to install a fence at my own cost. (con't.) 8) (2) Since this building was "uplifted" our office has had hundreds of favorable conmmnts as to it's neatness and eye appeal by chamber members, civic groups, office clients, and nunerous Marlene Lane Associationmembers. I sincerely hope that these clarifications will help allay Mrs. Vitale's concerns and I look forward to our continued, friendly relationship. cc: Jean E. Vitale O Southold, N.Y. 11971. (516) 765-1938 December 6, 1984 Robert A. Celic P.O. Box 1247 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site Plan of Robert Celic Dear Mr. Celic: We are in receipt of your site plans, and they have been reviewed by the Planning Board. The Board requests that you re-submit six (6) copies of the site plan pursuant to Section 100-134 to include the following site plan elements which were omitted from your present plan. 1. keymap 2. names, locations, and widths of adjacent streets 3. land use proposed, zoning, ownership 4. grading and drainage plan 5. vehicular and pedestrian ways including ingress and egress 6. outdoor lighting 7. landscaping plans, 25% of lot coverage 8. buffering 9. existing contours at intervals of 5' or less 10. location of trees with a diameter of 8" or more, measured 3' above base of the trunk. Please note, it is required that these additions are on the plan and dxawn by the surveyor. If you have any question% please don't hesitate to contact our office. Upon receipt of these plans, we will schedule an appointment on our next available agenda. ry trul~ yqur~. __. __ NETT ORLOWSKI, JR., C~AIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. O FORM NO, 3 O #0¥ 9 1984 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Date . .~ ................... 19 . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated . .(~ House No. Street ...... Hamle~ County TaxMapNo. 1000 Section .... 1..~..$ ..... Block ..... .~. ...... Lot .. J ........... Subdivision ................. Filed Map No .... : ............ Lot No .................. is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds..~4~' .g~.....~...~~ RV 1/80 ~WN OF $OUTI-IOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART ?ROJECT INFORMATION ' ' (n~alve new studies, r~sea~q ar investiqalian. If tnfa~!:Ion ~aui~ng such a~di:tonal ',art isJunavai~ole, ~e~dcw ar ltusnlan~ Farts :ad 5. 7. 8. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. · 16. © Approxi.r. ate percentac, e of proposed project site with slopes: greater %. O-lO: /017:; lO-IS: Is project contiguous to, or contain a building or site listed on the National RegistJr of Historic Places) Yes I~hat is the depth to :he water table? t · .. Op. hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? .. Yes Does project site contain a~ species of plant ar animal life that is identified as threatened or ~ndan~er~d - Yes ~[Io, a¢ca~ing to - Identify each species Are t~ere any un(quo or unu~al land fo~ on the p~ject site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological ideations - . Yes / NO. -(Describe Is ~e P~ject site p~ntly us~ by the ~unit7 or neighborhood as am open space or'~c~ation m~a-. Yes ~No. · ~es ~he~o-tte offer or include scenic views ar vts~s Yes m Streams Within or ~ontiguous to project area: /~ra~.'.~.: ...... a. Name af stream and name of river to which it is tributary Lakes, Ponds, ~etland areas within or contiguous tn project area: a. Na~ ; b. Size (in acres) '"B. PROJECT OE$CRIPTIOtl '' ' J I. Physical dir,.ensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions_ ~ ~_app~oprfate) a. Total contiguous acreage o~ned by project sponsor ~ ' acres. b. Ce ~hat is the dominant lanJ use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the prOject he ..oo' ' ...... Project acreage developed: ~acres tniti lly;e~/~acres ultimately. ' Projec~ acreage toramain undeveloped ~'.. ' · Length of project, in mites: ~-'--(tf app~p~iaCe) Zf project i&.~ e~panston of existing~ indicate percent of expansion proposed: butld(ng'square foot- age~"C~)~-developed acreage ~ ~/~. ;;~er of off-st~t parking spaces existing ~"~" Proposed ~ '" ": ' ' ~axi~u~ vehicular tr(ps gen~reted per hour J (upon c~plet~on of p~ect) "~' If ~sid~n:~al: ~er and t~pe o~ housing un,ts: ' Initial Ultimate If: One 'Pami ly Two Family ~ultipleP~i~ Cand~!inium Orientation Neighborhood-C! ty-Regianal Co.~e roi a 1 __ ~" Industrial ?o~al height o~ tallest proposed structure Estimated Employment 11. 0 0 much natural mat,flu1 (I.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be re~ov~.d from the site - cubic yard How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, g~oun~ covers) will be removed from site ----~fcres. Will any mature forest~ver 100 years old) or other locally-Important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? .Yes If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~ months, (including demolition). Lf multi-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipated ' .No. ' ' · ' ~:': b. A~ticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year {including ..... .. demolition) C. Approximate completion date final phase ~nth year. ..' d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phases? Yes Nc Will blasting occur during construction?. Yes ~ No ' "- ' " ~mber of jobs ~enerated: 4urtng construction ~ after project is completelY. . .' ' Nu~er of Jobs eliminated by this pruJect-(~-:. ... :' ~tll project requirer, location of any projects or facilities? Yes ~No.. If yes, explain: 12. a. Is surface or subsur(ace liquid waste disposal involved? Yes b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) c. Xf surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, stre~s, bays ar other surface wa:araays be increased or decreased by prupos'al? Yes 7~:CHo. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the lO0 year r~ood plain? Yes 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes b. If yes, will an ~xisting solid waste disposal facility be used? Yes No c. If yes, give name: ~ location d. ~ill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanita~! landfill?.~ Yes 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes .,)Z-No 17. Will project ruutinely produce odors'{more than one hour per day)?Yes 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local a~blence noise levels? Yes . lg. Will project tesul~ in an increase in ener~Lvuse? Yes ~ .No. If yes, indicate type(s) 20. 21. If water supply is fra~ a,ilS indiczte pumping c~pacity....~gals/minute. Total anticipated water usage ~er day _/~'i) gals/day. Zoning: a. ~hat is dcminant':oning classification of site? b. Current s;eclfic zoning classification of si:~ C. Is proposed use consistent with present zoning? d. If no, indicate desired zonin~ 26. 0 0 Approvals: a. Is any Federal pen~it required? Yes ~ 'b. ODes project involve State or Federal funding or financing? ¢. Lo~al and Regional approvals: Yes Submi ttal Approval (Date) COate) · OAT?.: App~val Required (irs, No) (Type) City. Town. Village Board " C~ty, Town, Village Planning 8oard ~ City, Town. Zoning Board ~ - .... City, County Health Oepart~,ent ~' Other local agencies I · Other regional agencies · ' ', ~tate Agencies ... .. Federal Agencies INFOrmATIOnaL DETAILS .... ' Attach any additional tnfo~tton.a$ may be'needed to clarify your project. If there a~or~y be any taken to mitigate or avei~L-~em., / ~/ ~ ~. PREJ~AR£R'S SI~IATUR£:~ TITLe: _.. § 100-125 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-130 (3) (4) (5) (6) The zone district classification of such property. A detailed statement of the relief sought by the petitioner. The provisions of the zoning ]aw applicable relief sought by the petitioner. A statement that within five (5) days will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Road, Southold, New York, and examined during regular office A statement that a public hearing ~ petition must be held by Town of Southold before the granted; that the person dressed, Main then be such of the so(~ght can ~_~ the notice is ad- has the right to appear ; and that a notice of such in the official town (5) days prior to such hearing will be newspaper not less public hearing. B. In lien of complying ~vith the provisions of this section, written verified wai~rs of notice executed by the persons entitled to receiv~uch notice may be filed with the Town Clerk at the t~e of filing the petition. c~ply/with the provisions of this section shall C. Failure to not affec/t~he/~alidity of any action taken by the Board of Appall. ARTICLE XIII Site Plan Approval § 100-130. General requirement. In all cases where this chapter requires approval of site development plans by the Planning Board, no building permit shall be issued by the Building Inspector except upon authoriza- tion of and in conformity with the plans approved by the Planning Board. § 100-131 ZONING § 100-132 § 100-131. Objectives. In considering and acting upon site development plans, the l'lanning Board shall take into consideration the public health, safety and welfare, the comfort and convenience of the public in general and the residents of the immediate neighborhood in particular, and may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards as may be required in order that the result of its action lnay, to the maximum extent possible, further the expressed intent of this chapter and the accomplishment of the following objectives in particular: A. Traffic access. That all proposed traffic accessways are adequate but not excessive in number; adequate in width, grade, alignment and visibility; not located too near street corners or other places of public assembly; and other similar safety considerations. B. Circulation and parking. That adequate off-street parking and loading spaces are provided to prevent the parking in public streets of vehicles of any persons connected with or visiting the use, and that the interior circulation system is adequate to provide, safe accessibility to all required off- street parking lots. C. Landscaping and screening. That all playground, parking and service areas are reasonably screened at all seasons of the year from the view of adjacent residential lots and streets, and that the general landscaping of the site is in character with that generally prevailing in the neigh- borhood. Existing trees over eight 18~ inches in diameter measured three (3) feet above the base of the trunk shall be retained to the maximum extent possible. § 100-132. Effect of approval. A. No building permit shall be issued for any structure covered by this Article until an approved site development plan or approved amendment of any such plan has been secured by the applicant from the Planning Board and presented to the Building Inspector. 10058 4- :~. s~ 10058.1 ?- as- ~5 § 100-132 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-13:{ § 100-133 ZONING § 100-133 B. No certificate of occupancy will be issued for any structure or use of land covered by this Article unless the structure is completed or the land is developed or used in accordance with an approved site development plan or approved amendment of any such plan. C. Should any site plan approval involve any matter requiring referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission, then the matter shall be referred, prior to final action by the Planning Board, to the Suffolk County Planning Com- mission in accordance with the applicable provisions of law. § 100-133. Procedure. A. Presubmission conference. Prior to the submission of a site development plan, the applicant or his agent shall meet with the Planning Board. The purpose of such conference (Cont'd on page 10059) shall be to discuss proposed uses or development in order to determine which of the site development plan elements shall be submitted to the Planning Board in order for said Board to determine conformity with the provisions and intent of this chapter. B. Within six (6) months following the presubmission con- ference, the site development plan and any related in- formation shall be submitted to the Building Inspector, in triplicate, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the Planning Board meeting at which approval is requested. If not submitted within this six (6) months' period, another presubmission conference may be required. C. The Building Inspector shall certify on each site development plan or amendment whether or not the plan meets the requirements of all Zoning Ordinance provisions other than those of this Article regarding site develop- ment plan approval. D. The Building Inspector shall retain one (1) copy and transmit two (2) copies of the certified site development plan to the Secretary of the Planning Board at least seven (7) days prior to the Planning Board meeting at which approval is requested. E. The Planning Board shall act to approve or disapprove any such site development plan within ninety (90) days after the meeting at which approval is requested. Failure to act within ninety (90) days shall be deemed approval. Planning Board disapproval shall include written findings upon any site development plan element found contrary to the provisions or intent of this chapter. In reviewing the ap- plication, the Planning Board may secure the advice or assistance of one ( 1 ) or more expert consultants qualified to advise as to whether a proposed use will conform to the requirements of this chapter. The assistance of a con- sultant, if sought, must be obtained within ten (10) days of the receipt of the application. Such consultant shall report within thirty (30) days after receipt of such request as to whether or not the use applied for will be in conformance with the performance standards and, if not, what 10058.2 ? -2s- ?~ 10059 § 100-133 SOUTHOLD CODE § 100-134 modification in desig~ or operation would be necessary for conformance. A copy of the report of such consultant shall be furnished to the Planning Board, Building Inspector and applicant. Amendments to a site development plan shall be acted upon in the same manner as the approval of the original plan. The Planning Board may require that site plan approval be periodically reviewed. .100-134. Site development plan elements. '' "The applicant shall cause a site development map to be prepared by a civil engineer, a surveyor, land planner, architect or other competent person. Site development plan elements shall include those listed below which are appropriate to the proposed development or uae as indicated by the Planning Board in the preeubmission conference: A. Legal data. ~ 11 Lot, block and section number, if any, of the property, taken from the latest tax records. (21 Name and address of the owner of record. (3) Name and address of the porson, firm or organizatinn preparing the map. Date, North point and written and graphic scale. (5) S~fficient description or information to precisely def'me the boundaries of the property. All distances shall be in feet and tenths of a foot. All angles shall be given to the nearest ten (10) seconds or closer. The error of closure shall not exceed one (1) in ten thousand (10,0001. 16) The locations, names and existing widths of adjacent street~ and curblines. (7) The location and owners of all adjoining lands, as shown on the latest tax records. 10060 § 100-134 ZONING § 100.134 Location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, setbacks, reservations and areas dedicated to public use within or adjoining the property. (9) A complete outline of existing deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property. (10)Existing zoning. B. Natural features. {1) Existing contours at intervals of five (5) feet or less, referred to a datum satisfactory to the Board. (2) Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stermwater overflows. (3) Location of existing watercourses, marshes, wooded areas, rock outcrops, isolated trees with a diameter of eight (8) inches or more measured three (3) feet above the base of the trunk and other significant existing features. C. Existing structures and utilities. (1) Location of uses and outlines of structures, drawn to scale, on and within one hundred (100) feet of the lot. (2) Paved areas, sidewalks and vehicular access between the site and public streets. (3) Locations, dimensions, grades and flow direction of existing sewers, culverts and waterlines as well as other underground and aboveground utilities within and adjacent to the property. (4) Other existing development, including fences, land- scaping and screening. D. Proposed development. {1) The location of proposed buildings or structural improvements. (2) The location and design of all uses not requiring structures, such as off-street parking and loading areas. 10061 4-~.s3 NOV ;ZgI984 0 TOWN OF $OUTHOLD. NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTOR APPEAL NO. DATE....~..o..y..e..m...b..e...~....]...5..., TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. ,, (We) ...... ....................... of Name of Appellant Street and Number Mattituck NY 11952 ......................................................................................................................... HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION DATED:10/9/84 FOR: Construct addition to office. WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ( ) ( ) (X) ROBERT A. CELIC Name of AppJicant for permit of PO Box 1247, New Suffolk Ave., Mattituck, NY 11952 Street and Number Municipality State PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY PERMIT TO BUILD Addition. ILl 1984 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY 10200 Main Rd./Marlene La. ,Mattituck B-[ . Street ~ Hamlet Zone ~i~.[~.].OO.Q~...~9~.t.].~.,...~p.Q~.~Lotl OWNER(S): R~ber~ A,.C~%i¢ ......... Mop No. Lot No. DATE PURCHASED: June,' 1983 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article III, Section 100-71 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (X) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Lows Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such oppeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No ................................. Dated ...................................................................... ( ) (X) ( ) is requested for the reason that REASON FOR APPEAL A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance we would like to Form ZBI (Continue on other side) REASON FOR APPEAL 0 Continued 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because present: real est:ate o£fice is extremely limited in space and required sales area facilit:ies. 2. The hordshipcreatedis UNIQUEondisnotshared by oil prope~ies alike in the immediate vicinity~ftb~ prope~¥and, in thisuse district, because comparable preexisting commercial- type ouiza£ngs in t~e area are situated much closer to the rear yard as well as the side yard lines then herein requested. 3 The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE OIARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because the planned construction would blend well with the architectural style of the surrounding commercial area. STATE OF NEW YORK )  )ss COUNTY OF ) Sworn to this ............ ../....."~,~ ............. day of..~~ ............. 19~/' ~ blic, State of New York '- ~2-"AN1175 Suffolk Co~nty~x My comm~io~ eSpir es Mar.3~ 19 ~ Stnie of New York Delpariment of 1)ublle Works OFFICIAL ORDER No.. ~ 17 DISCONTINUANCE OF STATE MAINTENANCE ON A PORTION OF RIVERHEAD - MATTITUCK. PARTS 1 & 3 STATE HIG~4AY NO. 818i TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY N. ¥- S. O. p. W. DIS'F. Pursuant to Section 62 of the Highway Law, it is ORDERED: That State maintenance on the following described portion of the Riverhead - Mattituck~ Parts 1 & 3 State Highway No. 8181, Town of Southold, Suffolk ounty, including any and all bridges or culverts located thereon or immediately adjacent thereto, as it had been maintaine¢ by the stare'as a'part of the State' Highway System before a ichange of location was made for the improvement of alignment cz' of dangerous conditions,' be and the same is hereby discontinued, and said portion shall be maintained hereafter by the Town of Southold, viz: All that portion of the old highway located between the · following described points: From Station R~65+O9 to Station-RS75+93, a total length of 1,085 feet. The portion of highway constructed on new location acquired to accomplish the improvement of alignment or of dangerous con- ditions as prescribed by Section 62 of the Highway Law, hav~ng been completed on State Highway No. 8181 by Contract FARC 57 20, accepted May 28, 1958, is hereby substituted for the portion ~ discontinued, which new portion is described as follows, viz: From Statio~ R~6~+89 to Station R~75+77, a total length , of 1,O88 feet. All of the above as shown on Discontinuance of State Maintenance ~,~p dated February 21, 1965 and filed in the N.Y. State Department of Public Works, 'and it is FURTHER ORDERED: That a certified copy thereof be mailed to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Suffolk County$ the Superinte2dent of Highways of Suffolk County; the Town Clerk of the Town of Soutbold; and the Town Superintendent of Highways of the Town of Southold. / ~'~"-, . , f////~ · ' ' '"" ¢'~'~/\'"'Z' '~"- H ' ,' u-- . ~. BURCH McMORRAN Superintendent of Public Works Main Road and Marlene Lane, Post Office Box 786, Mattituck, New York 11952 (516) 298-8000 Main Road, Post Office Box 640, Greenport, New York 11944 (516) 477-9400 June 28, 1986 Department of Transportation Mr. Alan Storjohann Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Dear Mr. Storjohann: RECEIVED JUL (: 1 1986 N.Y.$.D.O.T. REGION 10 With regard to your letter dated June 26, 1986, please be advised that the area marked in orange on your survey has been owned by me since 1966 and was purchased directly from the Town of Southold. I therefore wish to persue the purchase of the remaining yellow shaded area you have outlined. Pzomptness in this matter would be greatly appreciated due to the pending buiktng-addition application which I have before the Southold Town. Planning Board. Please call me at your earliest convenience to discuss any comments you may have at 298-8000. Thank you for your cooperation. ~y YojArs/~~'~ / ~'~obert A. Celic Att · REG. IO REAL ESTATE JUL' 1 1986 AOMINIS~AT{ON A~,~L ~EV~ ~ELoc~Jo~' ASSlSTANC~ NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS NEW YORK STA .%E ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS NATIONAL INSTJ]I.J~E OF FARM & [~,ND BROKERS NEW YORK STATE SOCIETY OF REAL ESTATE APpRAiSERS MEMBERS OF SUFFOLK COUNTY REAL ESTATE BOARD EASTERN SUFFOLK BOARD OF REALTORS INTERNATIONAL REAL ESTATE FEDERATION AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED APPRAISERS SUBJECT: FROM: TO: CC: RIVERHEAD-NATTITUCK, PTS. 1 & 3, S.H. 8181 SUFFOLK COUNTY. :, ·: -.::.' .... CONVEYANCE OF P/O NAP ~18& THE BED OF OLD ROAD N,' Doyle/A. Storjohann Ne apologize fo~ ~he delay in processing ~his conveyance ~eque~ (you~ ~da~e~of.:aanua~y 15;'~986). Ne had no~ objection lmm o~he~ dtvfstons co~e~n~ng::~On~A~ce of a:pa~ce] oa ~he sou~h of ~he exts~ing ~e]oca~ed highway as long as sufficien~ ]and was ~e~ained fo~ A closer check, however, Indicates t~AAthe old bed of S.H. 8181 was dlscon~inued to the Town of Sout~ by Offictal Order 917, copy. at~ached. We therefore could only convey the s~ll area north o~ :the.old road betas indicated on the attached print of the discontinuance ~p. If the Town is willing to dl~pose of the road bed, and there appears to be little reason not to, we will prepare the necessary conveyance to the north as indicated. It does not appear worthwhile otherwise. We would appreciate your contacting the requestee and' detemini~g~ if further action is warranted. We await your advice.. WL:SA Attachment TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUI'HOLD Suffolk Count, New York 516- 765-1801 N.0 ~ 14'~ § 2' Sou~hold, N. Y. 11971 ~ ~~~m~RECEI~ED OF~ --' LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Approved Proiect Type: Site Plans Status: Final Approval SCTM #: 1000- 143.-3-1 Proiect Name: Celic Robed (Robert Celic ~, Matt.) Address: Madene Lane, Mattituck Hamlet: Mattituck Applicant Name: Robed Celic Owner Name: Robed Celic Zone 1: B Approval Date: 2/10/1986 SCANNED DEC 3 20O7 '1 Records Management OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: east side of Marlene Lane, aka 10200 Main Road, in SC Filinq Date: .C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: Mattituck .SCAN Date: ..--..% ~0 · T~ C C ~T fi/I~TTI TU CtE I Al, ~ .!