Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6033 Py, /-2/07 ,3‘,9/ > net a,,_,c,,coeZta '00 tIer,92444L6iLy�"' Zedt -TedQ4-e j • .w.ct ///,-1/ Z.An boa w a,065 - ft Soo 6/4A '. Qxv/F serMck /P6-' F%L 4/dn/e7 r/a-fol b u&/o 11/2 r//4[o7 / � , 4 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS •t'i��'O f Soul Mailing Address: James Dinizio, Jr., Chairman t O� 4 '` Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer ,�� ~ O 53095 Main Road•P.O. Box 1179 * * , Southold,NY 11971-0959 Ruth D. Oliva �• G Q ,�C Office Location: Michael A. Simon ,p- �� Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman COMM Irof t� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) l .., ''''' Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RECEIVED TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - ; l . a:51?.in Tel. (631)765-1809•Fax(631) 765-9064 SE' 1 1 2007 Q • S .thold Town Clerk FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 2007 ZB File No. 6033 —Adrienne Landau Property Location: 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck CTM 94-1-7 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further review required under SEQRA. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The November 18, 2005 survey confirms the property size to be 31,772 square foot parcel with 100.55 feet along Soundview Avenue, 316.70 feet along the easterly lot line, 324.83 feet along the westerly lot line, and 99.04 feet along a tie line of a high water mark of the Long Island Sound. The property is currently improved with a single-story frame dwelling and in-ground swimming pool; a bulkhead was constructed at the toe of the bluff adjacent to the L.I. Sound tidal beach, which are also noted in ZBA file #3691 for this property containing 38,844 square feet on an October 1, 1983 survey prepared by Raymond W. Donack, Sr. The applicant's November 18, 2005 topographical survey shows an upland area of the lot measured from the lot line at the street to the current top of the bluff boundary to be +/- 247 by +/- 100.5 feet (+/- 24,823 square feet) and with fairly level land at 58 - 60 feet above mean sea level. To the north is the Long Island Sound, adjacent steep elevations along the face of the bluff, beach and bulkhead at the toe of the bluff. To the south is a Town street; to the west and east are lots, each improved with a dwelling. SUFFOLK COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT REPORT: In the May 16, 2007 Report issued by the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District, it was confirmed that the rear (northerly) yard slopes toward the east and north toward the top of the bluff, and storm water surface runoff is flowing over the top of the bluff, close to the eastern boundary and down the face of the bluff. The yard is a lawn maintained between the bluff boundary and the house, with an in-ground lawn-irrigation system. ' Page 27 August 16,2007 ZB File No.6033-Adrienne Landau CTM No. 94-1-7 BASIS OF APPLICATION: Zoning Code Section 280-116 (formerly #100-239.4A-1), based on the Building Inspector's January 4, 2006 Notice of Disapproval, amended April 4, 2007, concerning proposed new dwelling construction, after demolition of existing dwelling, with setbacks less than 100 feet of the top of the bluff adjacent to the Long Island Sound. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application has been referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning reply dated May 2, 2007 states that the application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. TOWN CODE CHAPTER 268 LWRP DETERMINATION Currently, an older dwelling exists that is in disrepair, and the applicant proposes to demolish the dwelling. Upon demolishing the existing dwelling, however, the applicant proposes to keep a portion of the aged foundation/wall at the northwest corner, which is a concrete section at only 19.5 feet from the top of the bluff. Also proposed to remain is an in-ground swimming pool, which is +/- 70 feet from the closest point of the top of bluff boundary (measured from the northwest corner). Numerous structural details, mapping and other data were offered by the applicant's architect in relation to the architecture of the proposed construction, offering a breakaway design used for new construction when located in Coastal High Hazard and nearby tidal/flood areas, subject to the National Flood Insurance Program, and current building codes. The requested variances are in the yard area closest to the top of the bluff, shown on a FEMA "X" Zone, above the VE high hazard flood zone adjacent to the L.I. Sound shoreline and beach areas. Based on the Building Inspector's April 4, 2007 determination under Chapter 280 (Zoning Code) and the May 18, 2007 Letter of Inconsistency issued under Chapter 268 (LWRP) Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Code, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, the construction as proposed does not meet the standards of coastal erosion/wetland/water bodies protection approved by New York State and Southold Town. There are alternative sites on this parcel for the applicant to build that would eliminate and remove most, if not all, of the requested setback nonconformities and inconsistencies with the Codes. The upland area between the top of the bluff and the street measures +/-247 feet in length, and between the two side lines the property 100 feet in width. The Code requirements are a minimum of: 100 feet from the top of the bluff, 15 feet on one side, 20 feet on the other side, and 50 feet from the front at street line. After subtracting these code-required setbacks, a fully compliant building area remains open in which to place construction alternatives, within +/- 6,510 square feet of land area. The applicant stated their desire not to submit alternative site plans that would bring the setbacks for new construction into greater conformity with the Codes. The request before the ZBA is for a new dwelling in a location that will create new nonconformities and increased degrees of code nonconformities, rather than in a more conforming setback location. The • Page 3-August 16,2007 n ZB File No.6033-Adrienne Landau fir' CTM No. 94-1-7 request by the applicant is inconsistent with the standards and policies of Town Code, Chapter 268 (LWRP), which mandates the highest standards of coastal erosion/wetland/water bodies protection approved by New York State and Southold Town. CHAPTER 280 (formerly Chapter 100) - ZONING CODE PROVISION: Zoning Code Section 280-116 (formerly 100-239.4A) states: 'All buildings located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluff or bank landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than one hundred (100)feet from the top of such bluff or bank." FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on June 28, 2007 and August 2, 2007, at which time written and oral evidence was presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The relief requested by the applicant is a reduction of the code-required 100 ft. minimum from the top of the bluff, for a 19.5 ft. setback from the top of the bluff at the northwest corner, the closest point. The entire dwelling will be larger than the existing nonconforming one-story dwelling to be removed, and the new construction will be entirely nonconforming, as proposed within the non-permitted setback area measured from the top of the bluff. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A new sanitary system is proposed to be constructed approximately 62 feet from the top of the bluff, after removal of the older system, as shown on the June 1, 2007 survey prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno. Also proposed is a new accessory building (carport or garage) at least 50 feet from the front/street lot line, with a separation of approximately 51 feet from the new dwelling, as proposed. An enlarged circular driveway with parking area is proposed, extending at least 50 feet from the street. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Pursuant to Town Law §267-b(3), the Board finds that the benefit sought by the applicant is outweighed by the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the community. Conformance to the required setbacks to the greatest extent practicable is required and has not been achieved herein. 2. Grant of the variance will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, Town Law §267-b(3)(1). The home that exists on the property is in disrepair and 19.5 feet from the top of the bluff, which places the entire building in a non-permitted location. The applicant wishes to demolish the existing +/- 1167 square foot one-story dwelling, and to construct a new +/- 3,903 square foot dwelling. The architect submitted plans, proposing an alternative setback of 38 feet and to build breakaway foundation construction at a maximum of 50 feet from the top of the bluff. At the second hearing, the architect offered to utilize the basement area, without removal of the lower • Page 4—August 16,2007 V ZB File No.6033-Adrienne Landau C CTM No.94-1-7 foundation that exists 19.5 feet from the top of the bluff, while continuing to demolish the existing floor areas of the existing dwelling, and construct a new two-story sections with upper roof deck, along the easterly side of the existing aged foundation walls, which new construction is significantly close and without conformity to the bluff setback requirement of 100 feet. There is land area available to consider a greater setback from the bluff for new construction (dwelling j with or without a swimming pool) in the yard areas south of the existing dwelling, which is +/- 178 feet from the front property line adjacent to the street (reference: June 1, 2007 survey prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno.) The dwelling on the westerly adjacent parcel was built on a foundation at least+/- 50 feet from the top of the bluff; the easterly adjacent lot is also improved with a dwelling. Permitting a new structure in place of the old nonconforming structure, at such close setbacks and in such large scale will adversely impact the neighborhood and the nearby properties. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(2). The proposed home can be built on a conforming area of the existing lot. The applicant states that the existing swimming pool was built 15+ years ago and the Board has considered the reasons provided for not changing the pool location, which pool is near the center of the lot between the bluff and the street, and that the owner does not wish to use this yard area for either a new dwelling or new pool location. The Board finds that in a project of this scale and impact, the existence of a pool which can be relocated should not carry the day. 3. The variances requested are substantial, resulting in an 80.5% reduction from the code required 100 foot minimum, Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(3). A major portion of the new construction is proposed entirely within the restricted, non-permitted 100 ft. setback from the top of the bluff adjacent to the Long Island Sound, although new construction for a carport structure is proposed in the conforming yard area that will meet the bluff setback requirement. 4. The difficulty has been self-created, Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(5). The applicant was asked to submit modifications, alternative plan B, Plan C, to increase the setbacks from the top of the bluff as alternatives. The applicant feels that the existing swimming pool was built 15+ years ago and refused to consider any modification to the overall. The accessory swimming pool structure is located, near center on the lot, and the applicant does not wish to offer an alternative for the new construction with or without the pool for more conformity to current codes. It is the Board's opinion that the 15+ year old swimming pool, and aged dwelling foundation area, compromise a plan that could be presented in more conformity with the Codes. The applicant's plan, as presented at both hearings, is compromised by the applicant's decision not to modify the plan further for more conformity, since it is based on their desire to use a basement section of the existed foundation/walls of the dwelling to be demolished, and desire not to utilize the remaining yard areas. 5. Evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood, Town Law §267-b(3)(b)(4). The rear yard, adjacent to the top of the bluff, slopes toward the east and north toward the top of the bluff. Storm water and surface runoff is flowing over the top of the bluff and down the face of the bluff. Storm water and surface runoff is flowing close into the -Page 5—August 16,2007 r 0 ZB File No.6033-Adrienne Landau *.-' CTM No.94-1-7 eastern boundary and adjacent lands, and the existing in-ground lawn-irrigation system increases the water flow into adjacent bluff areas. In light of the bluff areas and history of erosion in the vicinity of the new construction and adjacent land areas, the applicant is able to submit alternative(s) with a location with greater conformity to the codes than as submitted for consideration. It is the opinion of the Board that the new construction can be moved further back from the top of the bluff, with or without a swimming pool. The home that exists is in disrepair and the existing foundation is worn and aged, and not necessary to build a new dwelling. 6. The relief requested is not the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of the parcel for a single-family dwelling, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. The applicant was asked and encouraged during the hearings for different plans for consideration by the Board. The applicant confirmed they do not wish to submit additional site diagram alternatives to substantially increase the setbacks for the proposed construction for increased conformity with the Codes. Instead, the request for consideration is for a new dwelling in a location that creates new nonconformities as well as increased degrees of existing code nonconformities, and there is no alternate plan for the Board to address with increased setbacks from the top of the bluff. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Oliva, seconded by Member Goehringer, and duly carried, to DENY the application without prejudice, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Dinizio (Chairman), Oliva, Goehringer, and Weisman. Absent was: Member Simon. Th7 'injziocChma lution w ly adopted (4-0). ir.: _ g n 9/ /Q /2007 oved for Filing I RECEIVED 9- 4:04.41 a:slp.m . SEP 1 112007 S . hol T wnl 0 LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY,JUNE 28,2007 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 280 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971-0959,on THURSDAY,JUNE 28, 2007: 10:25 a.m. ADRIENNE LANDAU (EDWARD FAGIN) #6033. Request for Variances under Sections 280-116 (formerly #100-239.4A-1), based on the Building Inspector's January 4, 2006 Notice of Disapproval, amended April 4, 2007, concerning proposed new dwelling construction, after substantial demolition of existing dwelling, with setbacks less than 100 feet of the top of the bluff adjacent to the Long Island Sound, at 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck; CTM 94-1-7. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours and prior to the day of the hearing. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office at(631) 765-1809, or by email: Linda.Kowalski@Town.Southold.ny.us. Dated: June 4, 2007. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS JAMES DINIZIO, JR., CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing Address) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 #8410 STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Dina Mac Donald of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 week(s), successively, c,4.Lnmencin e 14th //,,day of June. 2007. Zbla Ike 0 Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this 16 day 2007 / C RIS INVOLINSKI NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01-VO8105050 Qualified) 111 Suffoik county CommISS1011 xpita► SSBfuary 28, 2008 1>f; � i�_''� i'" family dwelling, which win cons 1 A) 1, -\' -J ,p I.f1' a©'mcrease in the degree of non-con- , : - rrnxneei fZ iitd,floorlthnd,=storT),at 8 1, '0'U S1tmsIo.HlIlDnee,FOSS Island;CT 4 _- C , r`1 t 1;(15 p:rn^VALERIE?^and FOSTER REEVE 46041:Request Tor a Variance: under.Section 280 105, based on"thel. Building„Inspector's.October 6, 2006 Notice of Disapproval concerning,the height,of a proposedrfence',e$ceeding; ' 4494I.ry„pffx . - Joe~ Irmitationc of Ioum feet when-. ' 12O1S'ING 'Ioeata in flie44ont''yard;:at' 6375 Maui: . w.&.x' st,s 'l oad'ta// a Fronfdtreet),t'Greenport; .. '.17i.1jTSs?$:91; E378 2067<' •.: C04481:2; ' EU"BLIC,JIEARINGS 110p".m AMYt3ROSS;p6O45 Re NOTICE IS'JIEREBY GIVEN,pur= quest'for Variances under Sections 280-': silent to:Section 267`of the Town Law 1SF=and'280=116A,based on;the Build:' and Chapter 280'(Zoning),Code of the trig Inspectors April 16,2007 Notice of Town of Southold,the following puhhc, Disapproval concerning an,apphcatron hearings-will be held by'the-SOUTH- for a'building permit'concerning Pr'?"OLD TOWN ZQNR9G�BOARD OF posed addition toa single-family dwell-: APPEALS"at,the Town' Hall, 53095; mg,Pergola and swimming pool. The Main Road,PO.,Box 1179, Southold, reasons fpr disapproving the building • New-Yonk 119710959,,on3HURSDAY 'permit`application are that the adder; sT1'21sIE 2S;t2007, -: tion to dieiexisting dweling:will be leisl' 130 a. MARK MEI:NICK#6050:'". 'than IWOd e{from the top of(he bluff orl Request' t'for Reversal.of Building De bank adjacent-to the Long Island Sound;[" partinent._determinationa which states (2)the proposed addition yplaces the'ex that the"as built alteration to dwelling isting accessory garage partly in 4.44a:- includes demolition- and reconstruc- Yard;and (3) that the proposed san=" lion of the existing foundation deviated - ming poolconstruction'and pergola will. from-ZBAdecision#5977."ZBA#5955be less than the code-required 50 feet" granted applicant's prior request con from the front lot line when located in- from, cerning setbacks related to the proposed a front yard.Location of:Property,740 increase of ceiling height from 18'to 32' Northview Drive,Orient;CTM 13-1-4. and change from;the existing height of 1.30 p.m. JOSEPH .IAVARONE. 1.5 stories.;to two stories under Zoning #6047. Request for Variances under Code Sections 280-116 and 280-124. Sections 280122-0, 280-124, 280-11 Also requested if a reversal is not grant- 280-15, based on the Building Inspec- ed,is a_variance,amendment for recon- tor's September 7,2007 Notice of Dis- approval,of the dwelling with setbacks approval,amended-May 1, 2007, con- at less than 75 feet from the bulkhead, cerning proposed additions and altera- less than 35 ft.front yard setback,and tions to a nonconforming:dwelling and less than 35 ft. rear yard setback (ref to construct a new accessory garage. Burfding:Inspector's August 25, 2006 The new additions-to theodwellmg-Will Nonce of Disapproval,amended Sep- tember 28,2006).Location of Property: increase in the degree ofnonconfor- 405,Pnvate Road#3(a/k/a Pine Creek may when located less than 15 feet on a Rcn,d),S9utliow'CTM 70-6-15. single side yard and less than 75 feet to 9140 la-in.JOHN MAZUR,JRand the bulkhead:A new accessory building ALICE MAZUR#6044.Request for a (garage)is proposed to be located less Variance based_on the Building Inspec- than 15 feet from the side line.Location tor's May 7,2007 Notice-of Disapproval, of Property'450 Wood Lane(Richmond. based on.the Z$A'#5909 issued August Creek),Peconic;CIM 86-6-4. "17 2006 based on Building Inspector's[ 1 55gm,STEVE SACHMAN#6040. .;Aptal 3y,2pp6s,Notice.of Disapproval Request foreariances under Section .citing Sectfong:,280 122-0'and 280-124), 280 l5,hased,on an for a building per- -kr approval of the-location':of the new ant and thd,Building Inspector's April fotandation'it lest than"35'feet from 9 2007 Notice of'Diiapproval for an the'front yard line and less than 35 feet accessorygarage proposed-(1) at less from,the rear yard line,after demolition than 15 feeG€rom the side lot,line, of the foundation of the existing dwell- - at a size exceeding the code limitation ing and related construction,Location of 750 square feet,and(3)with dormers of Property.3200 Camp'Mineola Road, exceeding thecode limitationof40°0: of the roof width.Location of,Property: Mattituck;CTM 123-5-36.2. ; 9:55 am;- BREWERS . YACHT 4705 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue; YARD #6051.Request for Variance CTM 111-9-9- under Section 280-116, based on.the 2:10 p.m.:I BRIAN RETUS-#6049. Building Inspector's May 7, 2007 No- Request for Variances under Sections 'refof Disapproval concerning a pro-. 280,-116A(1)and 280-124-based'on'-the :Pp ed yleeessory,(pavilion) building at "Building.Inspectors May 14,2007 No- less than ts'feet'to'the'bulkhead,at 500- rice of Disapproval concerning:(1)pro- -13eatlsRoadpGreenport CTM 43-3-2. posed additions with alterations to:the l414/-h m.PAUL and CHERYL RA .existing dwelling proposed-at less than -GIJSA=#6048,Request for a variance TOO-feet'from the top of the bluff adja- -under Section=280-116A,based,on the cent 05 the Long Island Sound,(2)addi- Rujldtng Inspector's:May 20;2007 No- lion at less=than 15 feet on a single side tticp..of Disapproval-concernin yard,and (3) existing g a oto Rum at lees f posed'adfitionsZand alterations to the .We AQ,feet horn the top ofbluff,-[he existing-dwelling at less than 100 legit required minimum under'ZBA #3613. from the top of the bluff adjacent to the Location of+Property: 235'-Soundview Long Island Sound,at 1600 Hyatt Road. Road;Orient;CTM 15-3.4. Southold,CTM 50-1-6. 240p.m.NEW CINGULAR.WIRE-PCS (and EAST MARION .10:25 am. ADRIENNE LANDAU 'LESS : (EDWARD FAGIN) #6033. Request FIRE DISTRICT) #5826.Request for for Variances under Sections 280-116 a Special Exception under Sections 280- (formerly#100-239.4-0-1),based on the 69 and 280-70,concerning installation of Building Inspector's.January 4, 2006 a proposed public utility wireless tele- Notice of Disapproval,amended April tele- communications facility at the 4,2007,concerning proposed new dwell- by affixing wireless telecommunications mg construction,after substantial demo- antennas withinan approved pole to be lition of existing dwelling,with setback4 budt,and to-install relatedequipment as lessdhan 100Seetof the fop of the bluff. required,at 9245 Route 25,East Marion;. - -— adjacent io the`Long Island Sound,-at CTM 31-3-1131. 855 Soundview Avenue, Matttmck;: The Board of Appeals will hear all CTM 94-1-7 persons,or their representativesdesir- IL:35 a.m.JEFFREY AND-CAROL 7ngto be heard at each hearing,and/or OAK:#6096'.Request fora Variance un- desiring to submit written statements der Section 280-124,based on the Build- before the conclusion of each hear- ing Inspector's April 25,2007 Notice of. mg.Each.hearingwill not start earlier Disapproval,,amended- May 7,.,2007 than designated above.Files are avail- able--for additions and al able £or reviesw`durmg regular buss- 'e,;90.ona fo'fhe existingdwcllmg of less nes,hours and[poor to the dayqof the EIgux.:335 feet Irons;the front lot Inc,jat hearing.If you haver questions,please rove Drive,'Reydon'Shores'Lcts do not hesitate to contact our office 26anid-21(cbmbinedas due lot),,South, at(631) 7651809;-or by email:'Linda. o1/rvj80-410.1. Kowalski@Town.Southold.nyua 13Kf5 a.m. FRANK R LYON' and Dated;JunedI42007, - - 4,.. I';ALIE*DU PONT LYON=#6042, ZONING BOARD�OEAPPEALB 13', guPit for a Variance under Sections, JAMES DINIZIO;JR.,CHAIRMAN l$0-14,and 2808122,based on ZBA.In By Linda'Kowalski terpretation #5039(Walz Application) 54375'Maia'Road'(Ofce Location). fltfingsased on the Building Inspector's, 53095 Main Road(Miffing Address) 24, 20075 Notice of Duapproval P.O,Box I179 ssoncerntng a proposed additions and Souttiold,NY 11971-0959 efts ions in'a LaG (nQn y-:bedroom I 'no njttmB)'�I - storart tmriinaJe- .tRon A anNa nenuGga 33 FORM NO,3 aD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD i l IjJ BUILDING DEPARTMENT IJ SOUTHOLD, N.Y' NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE:January 4,2006 RENEWED:April 4,2007 TO: Narofsky Architecture A/C Fagan/Landau 4 W 22" Street,FL. 5 New York,NY 10010 Pleasetake notice that your application dated January 3,2006 For permit for to make additions and alterations to an existing sinele family dwelling at Location of property: 855 Soundview Ave.,Mattituck County Tax Map No. 1000-Section 94 Block 1 Lot 7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction,on this nonconforming 3,734 square foot lot in the R-40 District is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 100-239.4 A(t)which states• "All buildings located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluff or bank landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than one hundred (1001 feet from the top of such bluff or bank." The pro•osed-co. • • ton • es an 18.5 foot setback from the top of the bluff. uthoriz • S ..ature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application,may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. • tBsed 2056S9Lt29T 1d30 9NIOlIf9 U winos 02:Z1 L002-b0-170 K APPLICAI TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BC✓_RD OF APPEALS 24..2.41.1 ,I ,• For Office Use Only Fee:$4,00 — Filed By:l ..s.tA -Q G.� Date Assigned/Assignment No. Go 33 UUU APR 1 8 2007 Office Notes: Parcel House No. 855 Street Soundview Avenue Hamlet Mattituck SCTM 1000 Section 94 Block 1 Lot(s) 7 Lot Size 31,772 sq fkone R40 I (WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: April 4, 2007 Applicant/Owner(s): Adrienne Landau Mailing 350 West 50th Street, PH1A, New York, NY 10019 Address: Telephone: 212-459-1980 NOTE: In addition to the above please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent,architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Authorized Representative: Anthony C. Pasca, Esq. for(X) Owner,or ( ) Other: Esseks, Hefter & Angel, TIP Address: 108 East Main Street, Riverhead, NY 11901 Telephone: 631-369-1700 Please check box to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: 0 Applicant/Owner(s) )CAuthorized Representative 0 Other Name/Address: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED January 3, 2006 FOR: La Building Permit 0 Certificate of Occupancy 0 Pre-Certificate of Occupancy 0 Change of Use 0 Permit for As-Built Construction OOther: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article,Section, Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article XXII Section 280- 116 Subsection A(1) & (3) Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: N A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. 0 A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. la Interpretation of the Town Code,Article 280-116 Section A(3) 0 Reversal or Other A prior appeal N has 0 has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. 3691Year 1987 . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office to assist you.). P� / #1 II , Name of Owner: ISN . r -' ZBA File# REASONS FOR APPEAL(additional sheets may be used with preparer's sienature): AREA VARIANCE REASONS: (See Addendum) (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance,because: (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: (5) Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? ( )Yes,or pdNo. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety,and welfare of the community. Check this box( ) IF A USE VARIANCE IS BEING REQUESTED,AND PLEASE COMPLETE THE ATTACHED USE VARIANCE SHEET: (Please be sur nsult your attorney.) Signatu of Appellant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sworn to before me this WI— clay of pp-, I ,200-7 . Notary blit ELIZABETH A WINTERS Rotary Public,State of New Yost No.4811949 Qualified In Suffolk Canty OomniabnExpires September 30,20 12 3 ADDENDUM TO APPLICATION OF ADRIENNE LANDAU TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS This application seeks alternative relief. First, the application asks the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) to reverse the interpretation of the Building Department as to whether the proposed construction violates section 280-116A(1) (formerly § 100- 239.4A(1)) of the Zoning Code (requiring a 100-foot setback from the top of a sound bluff), by finding that the proposed construction falls within the exemption set forth in section 280-116A(3). Second, in the event that the ZBA agrees with the Building Department that the proposed construction is governed by (and not exempt from) the 100- foot setback requirement, the application asks the ZBA to grant an area variance from the 100-foot setback requirement of section 280-116A(1). Since the relief is requested in the alternative, each request will be separately addressed: A. Request for Interpretation of Section 280-116A(3) 1. Applicable Code Provisions: This appeal asks the ZBA to interpret Section 280-116A of the Zoning Code, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter, the following setback requirements shall apply to all buildings located on lots adjacent to water bodies and wetlands: A. Lots adjacent to Long Island Sound, Fishers Island Sound and Block Island Sound. (1) All buildings or structures located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluff or bank landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than 100 feet from the top of such bluff or bank. (2) Except as otherwise provided in Subsection A(1) hereof, all buildings or structures located on lots adjacent to sounds shall be set back not less than 100 feet from the ordinary high-water mark of said sound. (3) Buildings or structures which are proposed landward of existing principal dwellings shall be exempt from the requirements set forth in Subsection A(1) and (2) hereof. 1 w 2. History of Proposal and Efforts to Comply With Exemption: The applicant designed her proposed construction to comply with the letter and spirit of the exemption set forth in subsection (A)(3), including an interpretation of the code given to her consultants by the Building Department in March of 2006 -- an interpretation that the Building Department later repudiated after the applicant had expended substantial monies on plan revisions. The applicant's property is improved with an existing dwelling. As shown in the survey and plans attached to this application, the top of the bluff runs generally in a southwest-to-northeast direction. Since the existing dwelling faces north, the dwelling's northwest corner is the closest point of the dwelling to the southwest-to-northeast bluff line. The existing setback from the bluff at that corner is 19.5 feet. Recognizing the existing setback of 19.5 feet, and the code's provision that buildings "landward of existing principal dwellings shall be exempt" from the 100-foot bluff setback, the applicant's agents (including her architect and environmental consultant) had an in-person meeting with the Building Department on March 13, 2006 concerning how to comply with the exemption provision of subsection (iii). The Building Department expressed the position at that time that the proposal would qualify for the exemption of subsection (A)(3) if all proposed new construction is located at least one foot landward of the existing structure's closest setback of 19.5 feet. According to the Building Department's interpretation given in March of 2006, if the plans were designed so that no structure was closer than 20.5 feet to the bluff line, the new construction would be deemed "landward" of the existing dwelling and the plans would be approved without the need for a variance, since the construction would fall under the exemption. Based on those discussions, the applicant's architect prepared new plans to meet the Building Department's interpretation of the exemption. The plans were revised to show a "Top of Bluff Setback Line," which is a line located at the 19.5-foot existing minimum setback. All proposed construction (including the renovations and additions to the existing dwelling) is now located landward of that 19.5-foot setback line. The proposed new dwelling will utilize the existing structure's foundation, footprint, and some of the bluff- side façade as the northwest portion of the dwelling, but the northwest corner (closest to the bluff) will be setback at least one additional foot from the top of the bluff(i.e., to a 20.5-foot setback from the top of the bluff) so as to ensure that the new construction is "landward" of the existing structure. Second, while the proposal also includes additions located outside of the existing dwelling's footprint, those additions are located on the east and southeast portions of the property, meaning that they will be further from the bluff than the existing dwelling (with a minimum 52.3-foot setback from the bluff line). In short, all reconstruction and additions are located "landward of the existing principal dwelling," as required by the exemption. 2 Although the application met the Building Department's expressed interpretation of the exemption to the 100-foot zoning setback, the applicants still needed an approval from the Town Trustees, who have jurisdiction under Chapter 275 ("Wetlands and Shoreline") over all construction within 100 feet of bluffs. Like the Zoning Code's default setback of 100 feet, the standard required setback under Chapter 275 is also 100 feet from the bluff line to a principal dwelling. See Section 275-3(D)(1)(b)(1). Unlike the Zoning Code, however, which exempts structures "landward of existing principal dwellings," Chapter 275 does not contain such an exemption (though it does allow for "administrative" permit review of some additions "landward" of existing dwellings).` Although there is no exemption under Chapter 275, the Trustees do have the power (similar to the ZBA's variance powers) to vary or waive the 100-foot bluff setback requirement. See Section 275-3(D)(2). After a thorough review process, including a public hearing, the Trustees granted a permit for the proposed construction, finding, among other things, that: • "said application was found to be Consistent with Policy 6 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, by the Board of Trustees" • "the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code" • "the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the Town." (See Copy of Trustees' permit and plans submitted with this application). After receiving the Trustees' permit and an approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (see copy included), the applicant returned to the Building Department, which surprisingly changed its earlier interpretation that the proposal would be permitted as-of-right. The Building Department issued an April 4, 2007 Notice of Disapproval, based solely on the finding that the "proposed construction... is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 100-239.4(A)(1) [currently Article XXII Section 280- 116(A)(1)]...." After quoting from subsection (A)(1) only, without mentioning the exemption of subsection (A)(3), the Notice of Disapproval states that: "The proposed construction notes an 18.5 foot setback from the top of the bluff." That figure is actually Section 275-5(B)(2)(c) allows administrative review for the following category: "Construction of additions to the landward side of an existing functional single-family dwelling, where such dwelling generally lies parallel to the wetland boundary and provided that all new and existing runoff is captured on site. Such addition must be less than or equal to 25% of the area (footprint) of the existing structure." The applicants' proposal did not fall within this category because the additions constituted approximately 50% of the footprint of the existing dwelling. 3 incorrect, since the proposed construction will be set back a minimum of 20.5 feet from the top of the bluff. Although no explanation was given by the Building Department, this application will assume that the Building Department decided that the exemption somehow does not apply to the proposal. 3. Reasons Supporting Reversal of Building Department's Interpretation: Respectfully, the ZBA should reverse the Building Department's decision by interpreting the applicant's proposal as meeting the exemption of subsection (A)(3) of Zoning Code section 280-116. Several reasons compel this conclusion: First, the proposal meets the letter of the exemption, which categorically exempts from the 100-foot setback requirement all buildings and structures "proposed landward of existing principal dwellings." Based on the survey and site plan, the "existing principal dwelling" on the property is setback 19.5 feet from the bluff at the dwelling's northwest corner, and all new structures are proposed landward of that setback: the existing dwelling will be reconstructed and altered on the same foundation, but with a minimum 20.5-foot setback, and some additions will be located to the east and southeast of the existing footprint, meaning those additions will be even more landward of the existing dwelling. The letter of the code exemptions contains no restrictions, no qualifications, and no exceptions to the exemption. For example, the exemption contains no maximum size for the new construction (such as the provision contained in the Wetlands and Shoreline Code quoted in footnote 1 above, which is limited to additions totaling no more than 25% of the existing footprint). The exemption is not limited to additions or remodeling and does not in any way suggest that complete renovations or reconstructions would be exceptions to the exemption. The code exemption is straightforward, and the proposal meets the letter of the exemption. Second, the proposal meets the spirit of the exemption as well. The exemption did not exist when the 100-foot setback was first adopted. In fact, when the applicant's predecessor constructed the pool landward of the dwelling in 1988, he had to apply to this Board for a variance because the exemption did not exist. (See copy of prior application/approval included with this application). The exemption was obviously added to the code in order to ameliorate the effects of the 100-foot setback by grandfathering already-improved properties from the more restrictive requirements that would be applicable to new dwellings on unimproved properties. At the same time, by requiring that all new construction be "landward" of the existing dwelling, the code ensures that any pre- existing nonconformities are not made worse and that no new nonconformities are created. The current application complies with the spirit of those provisions by doing four things: (1) the portion of the reconstructed dwelling atop the existing foundation will be set back at least 1 foot more than the existing dwelling at the first floor, 4 (2) the second-floor portion of the dwelling being added atop the existing footprint is being setback approximately 20 feet from the northwest corner of the house (i.e., further landward of the bluff), (3) the decks that currently extend north from the existing house toward the bluff are being removed in their entirety, and (4) the additions to the footprint in the east/southeast portions of the property will be located further away from the southwest-to-northeast bluff line than the northwest corner. In fact, the northeast additions to the dwelling will have a minimum setback of 52.3 feet from the bluff. Since the exemption was clearly intended to preserve existing setbacks but ensure that new construction will not exacerbate the bluff nonconformity, the proposal meets those goals. Third, even assuming that the ZBA believes there is some question or ambiguity as to whether the exemption could be interpreted some other way, the applicant is entitled to the benefit of any doubt as a matter of New York law. The Courts have repeatedly stated that zoning regulations "must be strictly construed against the municipality which has enacted and seeks to enforce them." See Allen v. Adami, 39 N.Y.2d 275, 277, 383 N.Y.S.2d 565, 567 (1976). Consequently, "[a]ny ambiguity in the language used in such regulations must be resolved in favor of the property owner." Id. The fact that the Building Department in this case initially interpreted the exemption as being applicable to the applicant's proposal confirms that, in the very least, there is room for interpreting the code exemption as being applicable to this proposal. The Building Department may not simply change its mind and enforce a new, more-restrictive interpretation when its less- restrictive interpretation was and is rational and valid. The applicants are therefore entitled to the benefit of the doubt as a matter of law. Fourth, the applicants' interpretation of the code exemption is consistent with the general provisions in the Zoning Code related to dimensional nonconformities. Specifically, section 280-122 of the Zoning Code provides that, with respect to nonconforming buildings with conforming uses (i.e., buildings that are dimensionally nonconforming but have a conforming use), nothing "shall be deemed to prevent the remodeling, reconstruction or enlargement" of the building, so long as the proposal "does not create any new nonconformance or increase the degree of nonconformance...." The dimensional nonconformity here is the existing dwelling's failure to meet the 100-foot bluff setback. The "degree of nonconformance" at this time is 19.5 feet. Consequently, under section 280-122, the applicants would be entitled to reconstruct and enlarge their dwelling so long as they do not create any new nonconformance or increase the degree of nonconformance. They are not creating a new nonconformance (since the proposed dwelling will meet all other dimensional zoning requirements) and they are not increasing 5 Ned the degree of the bluff-setback nonconformance. On the contrary, they are reducing the degree of that nonconformance by ensuring an additional one-foot setback, even for the portion of the dwelling being reconstructed atop the existing foundation. 4. Conclusion Since the applicants' proposal falls within the exemption to the 100-foot setback cited by the Building Department, the ZBA should reverse the Notice of Disapproval. Assuming the ZBA grants that relief, the alternative request for a variance is not necessary. In the event that the ZBA refuses to grant that relief, the following section will explain why the applicants would also be entitled to an area variance, assuming that was necessary. B. Alternative Request for Area Variance from Section 280- 116A(1). If necessary, the applicants should be granted relief from the 100-foot setback requirement of section 280-116A(1) of the Zoning Code. Since Town Law § 267-b(3)(b) requires the ZBA to weigh the "benefit to the applicant" against the detriment, if any, to the community (as reflected in the five statutory factors), the following will address each of the statutory requirements. 1. Benefit to the Applicant The benefit to the applicant if the variance is granted is her ability to replace an existing dwelling with a more modern and accommodating one, while still enjoying the scenic benefits of the property's location atop the bluff of the Long Island Sound. The most beneficial feature of the subject property is its location and views. The property is benefited by a bluff, which is not only protected on its seaward edge by a bulkhead, but which is fully vegetated to prevent erosion. The property enjoys breathtaking views of the Long Island Sound. The highest point of the property is the current location of the existing house, where the adjacent grade is approximately 60 feet above sea level. (See survey/site plan). The proposed reconstruction seeks to take advantage of those beneficial views by leaving the location of the dwelling mostly within its current footprint, with the addition of a second floor and some additional footprint on the eastern/southeastern portion of the property. Since the existing deck located seaward of the house will be removed (thereby losing the beneficial views from that deck), the proposal includes decks located on the second floor, setback higher and further from the bluff than the existing first-floor deck. The benefits to the applicant are substantial. If the reconstruction is allowed to proceed, she will continue to enjoy the existing benefits of the property's location and views, but in a larger, more accommodating, and modern dwelling. 6 2. Character of the Community The applicant does not believe that the granting of a variance in this case will have any adverse impact on the character of the community. If anything, the granting of the variance will improve the character of the community, because it will enable to applicant to construct a new dwelling to replace the existing dwelling, which is in dire need of upgrades. The home has been designed by award-winning architect, Stuart Narofsky, AIA (see his website at www.narofsky.com), and incorporates numerous "green" elements within the design. The aesthetic improvements alone should warrant a finding that the proposed variance will not have a detrimental effect on the character of the community. With respect to other properties, the applicants' property is similar in configuration to nine other properties located along the Long Island Sound in Mattituck, in the "R-40" portion of Soundview Avenue, just east of Lloyd's Lane. (A copy of a "Google Earth" aerial photograph, with markings of the ten properties, is attached, along with a copy of the relevant tax map sections showing the boundaries of those ten lots). As shown in the aerial and tax map, the ten total properties are all rectangular, extending from Soundview Avenue in a north/northwest direction, down the bluff to the beach of Long Island Sound. All ten lots appear to be 100 feet in width at the beach. Of those ten properties, the applicants' appears to be the shortest in length as measured from either the bulkhead to Soundview Avenue or the top of the bluff to Soundview Avenue, meaning it has the least amount of upland on which to locate a dwelling, as compared to the similarly-situated lots in the immediate neighborhood. All of the lots involve similarly- restrictive siting constraints. Moreover, the aerial confirms that the siting of the applicants' home is consistent with the existing character of that immediate neighborhood. With the exception of one dwelling located closer to Soundview Avenue, the remaining nine properties are sited closer to the bluff, all with an apparently similar setback from Soundview Avenue to the applicant's existing dwelling. Thus, by maintaining the existing general location of the dwelling, the character of the neighborhood will remain unchanged. 3. Size of Variance While the requested variance could, in the abstract, seem substantial (a 20.5 foot setback where 100 feet is required), it is in fact insubstantial in context, since the existing setback is actually less (19.5 feet). Moreover, the proposed 20.5-foot setback is only at the northwest corner of the property, and the rest of the north façade of the house (the side closest to the bluff line) is much further setback than 20.5 feet. In fact, the northeastern 7 ire *is addition to the house will be setback more than 52 feet from the bluff line. In other words, this is not a case where a solid, monolithic wall will be created within a required yard. Rather, only one point of the house will be located at the 20.5-foot setback, and the remaining facade will be setback much further. 4. No Feasible Alternatives to Achieve Desired Benefits The benefits to the applicants cannot be obtained through any other alternative that does not require a variance. The topography of the lot is such that the proposed location of the dwelling is the highest point on the property, where the benefits to the applicant are most apparent. Setting the house back further from the bluff line would cause the house to be located "downhill" from the western portion of the bluff (which is at elevation 65), thus resulting in a loss of the primary benefits of the property. Additionally, the house was designed specifically to meet all other zoning requirements. As the site plan shows, the house will fit within all other setback requirements, including the front-yard, side-yard, and 100-foot-from-water setbacks. The front yard setback effectively limits the ability to move the house further away from the bluff line without creating a new nonconformity (and a new requirement for a variance). 5. Lack of Adverse Physical/Environmental Impacts The proposed variance will not cause any adverse physical or environmental impacts on the neighborhood. In fact, the application was presented to the Town Trustees -- whose jurisdiction was precisely to safeguard the environmentally-sensitive bluffs -- and the Trustees approved the project, certifying that the "project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town." Additionally, the applicants' proposal includes numerous environmental improvements, designed to mitigate against any impacts associated with development near bluffs. For example, a row of staked haybales and project limiting fence will be installed landward of the crest of bluff to contain site disturbance during construction; a drainage system of drywells will be installed to capture and recharge roof runoff from the new dwelling; and an upgraded sanitary system will be installed to provide proper treatment of on-site septic waste. The architecture of the proposed house also incorporates "green" elements, described further above. 6. Self-Created Difficulty 8 Iwo? est Although the applicant acquired the property after the 100-foot-setback requirement was adopted, the existing home (with a 19.5 setback) pre-dates the 100-foot setback requirement, and the code specifically grandfathers pre-existing dwellings (see argument above regarding interpretation of exemption). Additionally, the house was specifically designed to meet the interpretation of the code exemption made by the Building Department in March, 2006. That interpretation was only changed in April of 2007, i.e., after the applicant owned the property. Finally, the "difficulty" in meeting the bluff setback is also created by the pre-existing configuration, topography, and zoning of the lot. If the 100-foot bluff setback were enforced, the building envelope would be impracticable. Thus, the difficulty is not "self-created." 9 Sir APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For ZBA Reference) Applicant: ADRIENNE LANDAU, Date Prepared: 4/16/07 I. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: REMOVE EXISTING WOOD DECK AND FOOTINGS,REMOVE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DOWN TO EXISTING FOUNDATION.SEE ATTACHED DRAWINGS A-2&A-3 TO DETERMINE HOW MUCH EXISTING FOUNDATION IS TO REMAIN. II. New Construction Areas (New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: OLD-30'-0"X39'-0" NEW-68'-0"X19-6"+- Dimensions of new second floor: NEW-68'-O"X 16'-6'+- Dimensions of floor above second level: LOFT LEVEL-17'-0"X 18e-0"+- Height (from finished ground to top of ridge): 33'-7" Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: NO-EXISTING BASEMENT TO REMAIN Ill. Proposed Construction Description (Alterations or Structural Changes) (attach extra sheet if necessary)- Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: EXISTING ONE STORY DWELLING WITH TWO BATHROOMS,THREE BEDROOMS AND ONE KITCHEN Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: NEW TWO STORY DWELLING WITH THREE BATHROOMS,THREE BEDROOMS ONE KITCHEN,PAINTING STUDIO,HOME OFFICE AND LOFT. IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 1,167SQFT Proposed increase of building coverage: TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING AREA-3,100 SQ FT Square footage of your lot: 31,772 SQ FT Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: 9.76% V. Purpose of New Construction: TO ADD TO&RENOVATE AN ANTIQUATED POORLY CONSTRUCTED EXISTING DWELLING WITH A MORE MODERN CONSTRUCTION THAT MEETS ALL WIND LOADS AND INCORPORATES ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS MATERIALS WHILE KEEPING IT'S PROXIMITY ATOP THE BLUFF OF LONG ISLAND SOUND VI. Please describe the land contours (flat, slope %,heavily wooded, marsh area, etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): IF EXISTING DWELLING IS TO BE REMOVED,NEW BUILDING AREA PER CODE SETBACKS,WOULD BE PLACED AT THE STREET AND LOCATED FOUR FEET LOWER IN ELEVATION THAN THE EXISTING DWELLING.THE EXISTING STRUCTURE SERVES AS A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING,THE NEW ADDITION WOULD AS WELL. KEEPING THE DWELLING AT IT'S CURRENT LOCATION,IS THE ONLY PRACTICAL CHOICE. Please submit seven (7)photos, labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction), and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 1 • •oma -y y _ ; _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD M - /o OWNER C STREET VILLAGE DIST. _SUB.- LOT -Iy�5st, 5el 1 1-H i_ CU �`(�/ l�f f N"�. C ,- 4.1 �. ? j .-C4- .. M/�I2SMER NER N /00.06 E ACR. curu GUI cla r •ly, d_. S• are/flI (e 1 , 9/7 S /ce,ss W- TYPE OF BUILDING � V go 6 kTie_i W M ow,E AY a.4wo oQc+-,-sleu t - -+^�Cio-_e., 22 1LLJ ------ )1 7'14e- i� .. - at _ p-1SEAS. L VL - FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value LAND I IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS -- - �t-,,-�7-,ate: , g s"d U `�i ., '/S.00 ice)0 --00✓y/3'"j63 .-. . : .en,fvn„X.-- 1g`?/ . J;; r Slop /sdU In 113ao ✓3�slGSL �- /�/ ✓ sir/a S'- `� ..7„?' re. 7- SII-1/� 00 o2.l--ere f a d /34677ad-step te/3/7/ <, Z-7S zy ,/l8/75/ Stitt 'f,Soo. RAu,mow e'er 4A^u.. ��,e. H• Coieeu/eo ,LW_ --f AGE ^-�^~ BUILDING CONDITION /o%y3 i!n 1sizao&ifnl10wa)Cor2cL u lz,GuiDo .L-94a. 2 3417 ' NDN NORMAL BELOW ABOVEdi �AFRM 8 -Lt007IZ•6u1,-102Se1044 •275000 F Acre Value Per Value Acre 3%x1,87 78f/5.713 z dock.adc/I4nL. cc 4 950 liable 1 I Tillable 2 - I Tillable 3 'Woodland ( { :Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER 700,0 !, eV d'7 n: ', 70-0 'Brushland _ FRONTAGE ON ROAD /pa,j-S” - = - ,. House P .... v DEPTH Q.,f,/..t3 9 S � I . BULKHEAD Total DOCK I 1 r- , t 1' �1@4t,1{y'.,CC, l '@`+��MV�\ a` "�'a jc;L - - '�_ —Pi aca � i b, a9'1 . i —1 __ - r '+ 4.'t f - TRIM - - i j x , - N ; L I •t- .A —1--- 1 rr r , M. Bldg. I "_/, .,- .Z! - ' i 7 3 o° Ito 7 Foundation (i 1/ ort..., Both i _ % / Dinette 'Extension I Basement Floors Y K. Ext. Walls a, Interior Finish Extension F)_ v "42f/: LR. lehvon Fire Place —2/1-0 Hoot Y LD DR. Type Roof }-,Cf``1_.`r"_ Rooms 1st Floor BR. Porch - Recreation Room Rooms 2nd Floor FIN. B. ,rI t U ; 2. X Z 2 < Dormer• i Breez*Nay DFC/{ 'q X 'let t ,N.G. stay ,dS /a) , Driveway --. .--_ Garage Pntio Total c.1 r lv/. —__— — 1 __---__— COUNTY OF SUFFOLP [ • f Allo L ' R. '3COIL,. { y Y /: G.per, as . n� IggIa ) STEVE LEVY I Y SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE -M SOIL AND WATER Thomas J. McMahon CONSERVATION DISTRICT DISTRICT MANAGER FAX: (631)727-3160 —; (631)727-2315 t .:2 - T May 16, 2007 SAY � 8 20C (to o33 Board of Appeals Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Attn: James Dinizio, Jr. Dear Mr. Dinizio: As per your request a site inspection and evaluation has been made for ZBA File Ref. No. 6033 dau). he site inspection was conducted on May 16, 2007 and found that the property has a • e Ing on it in disrepair, a bluff, and a beach adjacent to Long Island Sound. The toe of the bluff at this property, as well as the adjoining properties, has bulkheading installed. The bluff face is well vegetated with grasses, weeds,brush and several, fairly large pine trees. A wooden stairway extends from the top of the bluff down to the beach. There is sparse vegetation and a minor amount of soil erosion occurring under areas of the stairway. The rear yard of the property is vegetated with well-maintained turf grasses and has an in-ground irrigation system. The rear yard slopes toward the east and the top of the bluff. It appears that storm water surface runoff is flowing over the top of the bluff, close to the property's eastern boundary, and down the bluff face. There is an existing wooden deck on the rear of the dwelling,which at the closest point, is approximately 22-feet away from the top of the bluff Reconstruction of a new dwelling on this site has the potential for causing bluff erosion due to increased imperviousness and runoff water flowing down the bluff face. However, review of the site plans reveals that drywells are proposed that would discharge roof runoff into the subsoil and not increase runoff flowing down the bluff face. Also indicated on the site plan is a row of staked hay bales with silt retention fence. The proposed placement is incorrect and will divert and concentrate surface runoff to flow onto the neighboring lot to the east and down the bluff face. Hay bales and/or silt fence should be installed on the contour,not up and down, a slope. It is recommended that a sediment and erosion control plan be developed for this project. P / of2--. 423 GRIFFING AVENUE . SUITE 110 . RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 If you require additional information or if you have any questions,please feel free to contact this office. Respectfully, Thomas J. McMahon District Manager ie al Pk No '-cjj 423 GRIFFING AVENUE SUITE 110 RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 t'fr pF SOUL OFFICE LOCATION: it' oW yQ ' MAILING ADDRESS: Town Hall Annex P.O. Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 r0* * , Southold, NY 11971 (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) y Southold, NY 1E Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 -KyU0UNT1� '' LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM COORDINATOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: James Dinizio, Jr., Chair Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals From: Mark Terry, Principal Planner 1* LWRP Coordinator Date: May 18, 2007 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 6033, for Adrienne Landau i SCTM#1000-94-1-7 MAY 9 1 2007 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 268, Watei-front ConaistettcyRevielw of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program OW) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the denoted following Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. Policy 4: Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. 4.1 Minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards. The following management measures to minimize losses of human life and structures from flooding and erosion hazards are suggested: A. Minimize potential loss and damage by locating development and structures away from flooding and erosion hazards. 3. Move existing development and structures as far away from flooding and erosion hazards as practical. Maintaining existing development and structures in hazard areas may be warranted for: a. structures which functionally require a location on the coast or in coastal waters. b. water-dependent uses which cannot avoid exposure to hazards. c. sites in areas with extensive public investment, public infrastructure, or major public facilities. c. sites where relocation of an existing structure is not practical. Policy 6: Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. A. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the Southold Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. The proposed setback of the western corner of the new structure from top of bluff is 19.5 feet; the eastern corner of the proposed house is 52 feet from the top of bluff; a minimum separation distance of 100 feet is required pursuant to Chapter $ 275-3. Findings; purpose; jurisdiction; setbacks. In addition, pursuant to Article XXIII Section 280-116 of the Town of Southold Town Code a minimum setback of 100 feet is required from the top of bluff on Long Island Sound. Please require that the applicant amend the application to meet the above policy to the greatest extent practical. Additionally,if the action is approved and to further Policy 5: Protect and Improve Water Quality in the Town of Southold: Relocate proposed sub-surface drywell further landward of the bluff. The proposal locates a drywell for roof runoff 20 feet from the top of bluff. The routing of water to this area may cause an increase in weight loading on the bluff, expedited erosion during a high rain condition, and may lead to slope failure. I recommend the drywell is located at least 50 feet landward of the bluff. Pursuant to Chapter 268, the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. COUNTY OF SUFFOLIt"'' a i I SAY 2007 • 1 .-44* STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING THOMAS ISLES,AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING May 2, 2007 Town of Southold ZBA 53085 Main Rd.,P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Dear Sir: Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application(s)submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Applicant(s) Municipal File Number(s) Smith 6025 Kelly 6026 Katapodis 6027 Alessi 6028 Daneri 6029 Byrne 6031 Hansen 6032 Landau 6033 Kruk 6034 Very truly yours, Thomas Isles, AICP Director of Planning S/sTheodore R. Klein Senior Planner TRK:cc LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H.LEE DENNISON BLDG.-4TH FLOOR . P.O.BOX 6100 . (631)853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER(631)853-4044 3 James F.King, President ,. C* ? SOo4,O- Town Hall Jill M. Doherty,Vice-President $e,`O of -4 53095 Route 25 �� P.O. Box 1179 Peggy A. Dickerson Southold, New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen 1 cact oc John Holzapfel 4..bI Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-6641 =�CONNTV,t30' BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 23, 2006 Mr. Robert E. Herrmann En-Consultants, Inc. 1319 North Sea Rd. Southampton, NY 11968 RE: ADRIENNE LANDAU 855 SOUNDVIEW AVE., MATTITUCK SCTM#94-1-7 Dear Mr. Herrmann: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wed., August 23, 2006 regarding the above matter WHEREAS, En-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of ADRIENNE LANDAU applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated August 2, 2006, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 268-5.H, said application was found to be Consistent with Policy 6 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, by the Board of Trustees, and will further the policies by the installation of gutters and drywells to contain the roof run-off, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 23, 2006, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, i �✓ WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of ADRIENNE LANDAU to renovate, partially restructure, and expand the existing one-story, three- bedroom dwelling into proposed two-story, four-bedroom dwelling; replace existing pool patio; relocate and upgrade sanitary system; and install drainage system of drywells, and all as depicted on the site plan prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno last dated July 31, 2006. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $50.00 Very truly yours, Jame F. King ✓ President, Board of Trustees JFK/Ims PLEASE NOTE: THIS GSE DOES NOT REQUIRE "CERTIFICATE OF CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM INSTALLATION" FORMS • STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES BRIAN L.HARPER,M.D.,M.P.H. COMMISSIONER PERMIT The attached plan, when duly signed by a representative of the Department, constitutes a permit to construct a water supply and/or collection system for the property as depicted. The applicant should take note of any conditions of approval, which may be indicated on the plan or enclosed herein. Construction must conform with applicable standards including "Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Single'Family Residences" and "Standards and Procedures for Private Water Systems." Omissions, errors or lack of details on the plan does not release the applicant from the responsibility of having the construction done in conformance with applicable standards. The permit (plan) expires three (3) years after the approval date. Any modifications which may affect the proposed sewage disposal or water supply systems requires submission of a revised plan and additional fees (if applicable) for _ reapproval prior to construction. No inspections will be performed by the Department on expired permits. Permits may be renewed, extended, transferred or revised in accordance with the procedures described in "Submission Requirements for Approval of Sewage Disposal and Water Supply Facilities for Single Family Dwellings" (Form WWM-041). It is the applicant's responsibility to call the department at 852-5754, in advance, to arrange inspections of the sewage disposal and/or water supply facilities prior to backfilling. These include inspections of the sewage collection and disposal systems, water supply system components and piping, and final grading as shown on the approved plans. In certain cases, inspections of the soil excavation may be required to determine the acceptability of the soils for sewage disposal systems. The Department must be notified at least 24 hours in advance to schedule an inspection and excavation inspections must be confirmed by calling 852-5700 prior to 9:30 A.M., the morning of the inspection. Article VII of the Suffolk County Code, "Septic Industry Businesses," requires that all installers of septic systems within Suffolk County shall possess a valid license from the Suffolk County Office of Consumer Affairs. This office can refuse to perform inspections or grant final approval for the construction of projects that are installed by an unlicensed individual. It is, therefore, in your best interest to utilize a cesspool contractor with a valid license to avoid substantial delays in your project. FINAL APPROVAL ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT IS NECESSARY PRIOR TO THE OCCUPANCY OF NEW BUILDINGS, ADDITIONS TO EXISTING BUILDINGS, OR FOR THE USE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL OR WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS. WWM-058 (REV. 9/05) PAGE 1 OF 2 ,DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY•OFFICE OF WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT•360 YAPHANK AVENUE,SUITE 2CnYAPHANK NY 11980. PHONE: (631)852.5700 Fax: (631)8524755 • INSTRUCTIONS FO INAL APPROVAL OF Co STRUCTED SYSTEMS It is the applicant's responsibility to call the Department to arrange inspections of the sewage disposal system and water supply facilities prior to backfilling. These include inspections of the soil excavation for the sewage disposal system, when required, and inspections of the water supply well, well lateral,public water supply line, disposal system,piping and final grading. Other inspections may be required. Following satisfactory construction and inspections: 1. The applicant must submit 4 prints of an as-built plan (up to and including 11"x17"), by a licensed design professional, of the4subject property showing the following: a. the lot location and metes/bounds description; b. the lot number(s) and the name of the subdivision, if applicable; c. permanent structures (i.e.,buildings, driveways, walkways, swimming pools, decks, retaining walls, etc.); d. the exact location of the private well and lateral, if applicable (give at least 2 dimensions measured from the corners of the building to the well); e. the exact location of the public water line, if applicable; f. the exact location of the septic tank and leaching pool(s), if applicable (give at least 2 dimensions measured from the corners of the building to the covers of the septic tank and each leaching pool); g. the exact location of the sewer line from the dwelling to the street; if applicable; and h. have a clear area at least 3" x 5" for the Department's approval stamp. 2. If a subsurface sewage disposal system has been installed, the applicant must submit a certificate from a licensed sewage disposal installer, attesting that the system has been constructed according to the criteria of the Department. 3. If a well has been installed as the potable water supply, then the applicant must submit a well water analysis completed within one (1)year by a certified lab, and a well driller's certificate completed by a licensed well driller. If the well or water quality does not conform to-standards, corrective measures will be required as described in the Department's "Private Water System Standards." Please note: water treatment units may not be installed without prior approval of the Department. 4. If public sewers are utilized for the dwelling, the applicant must also submit one(1) copy of the sewer line inspection approval from the sewer district. In districts operated by Suffolk County, one(1) original of Form S-9, duly executed by the Suffolk County Department of Public Works,and one(1)copy of a Suffolk County Department of Public Works field sketch are required. 5. If public water is utilized, a tap letter from the appropriate water district indicating that service has been completed to the dwelling will be required. 6. In certain cases, the applicant will be required to submit a certification from a licensed design professional, attesting that all components of the sewage disposal system, retaining wall or sewage collection system have been properly inspected and constructed according to the approved plans and permit conditions. Refer to "Certification of Constructed Works" (Foran WWM-073). 7. The applicant must submit a"Certificate of Carbon Monoxide Alarm Installation,"(Form W WM-075). HEALTH DEPARTMENT REFERENCE NUMBER MUST BE ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE OR DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. SUBMIT ALL NECESSARY FINAL PAPERS AT THE SAME TIME. PHOTOCOPIES OF DOCUMENTS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. WWM-058 (Rev. 9/05) PAGE 2 OF 2 5 ( :ov ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL, LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW i ` 1 1 20. /(PIO IQ$ EAST MAIN STREET ✓ ( P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (631) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R. ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER (631) 369-2065 P. Box 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 CARMELA M. DI TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK THEODORE D. SKLAR June 7, 2007 NANCY SILVERMAN LISA J. Ross MELISSA H. SIDOR S t00? Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Linda Kowalski Re: Application of Adrienne Landau ZBA File No. 6033 Premises: 855 Soundview Avenue Mattituck, New York SCTM No.: 1000-099.00-01.00-007.000 Dear Ms. Kowalski: Relative to the above application, please find enclosed the following: 1) Affidavit of Mailings with names, addresses and parcel numbers and Legal Notice attached, as well as certified mail receipts; 2) Eight (8) copies of a letter from me to the Members of the Board with survey attached regarding a new sediment control plan; and 3) Eight (8) copies of a letter from Stuart Narofsky, AIA to Zoning Board Members explaining what portions of the existing dwelling will remain, what portions will be demolished, and what portions are new construction. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, /bw Enclosures Anthony C. Pasca r I<, ARCHITECTUREi:. Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 June 05, 2007 Re: Application of Adrienne Landau renovation & addition to existing residence at 855 Soundview Ave. Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Board members, Narofsky Architecture has prepared the following project description and diagram (see attached drawing) to help clarify some of the confusion between what portions of the existing dwelling will remain, what portions will be demolished and what portions are new construction. As illustrated in the diagram, the solid wide lines along with the dashed lines create the perimeter of the existing residence, indicated in red, a one story cape of 1,162 square feet over a partial basement containing mechanical equipment and crawl space. The proposed design modifies the east side of the existing structure by demolishing approximately 477 square feet, represented by the dashed lines, of the existing residence in order to open up the view from the front yard. The existing structure's gable roof is to be removed to allow construction of the main floor level and a new view deck, accessed from the new master bedroom and living room. This viewing deck area is represented by the dotted hatch. The existing walls, represented by the thick solid line, will remain and have new windows and siding installed. Added behind and to the east of the existing structure is a new steel frame addition consisting of guest and mechanical rooms on grade level (no new basement or crawl space is proposed) and living and master bedroom space on the second floor, represented by the thin solid line. All of the new construction is proposed landward of the existing structure and existing top of bluff setback line. If there are any further questions about this or any other issue, I will be attending the hearing on June 28th to address any questions the Board may have. Thank you Stuar Narofsky,AIA stir WWW.NAROFSKY.COM 4 W.22ND STREET NEW YORK,NY I 00 0 T. 212.675.2374 212.675.2375 EXISTING STRUCTURE TO OE REMOVIED - TOP OF CLIFF 4P OXIMATELY 4T1 SOUAR:FEET unimmo Ex16TING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN W/NEW umcouB/SIDING TO x NSTA,FP] EXISTING TOP OF BLUFF PERIMETER OF PROPOSED NEW STEEL 7 7 SETBACK LINE PR4MED ADDITION C246I6TN3 OF GUEST/ ITECNANICAL R60a1S ON GRADE LEVEL(NO NEW ISASErENT OR CRAB-SPACE IS PROPOSED)/LIVING AND MASTER EEDROOI SPACE 04 THE SECOND FLOOR -k a 010.40," / • ;e1,,kirtf, j� k''�a"l�� EXISTING GABLE ROOF TO EEib_''k3 "L.'•/ ,v'�' ��' 4 R 1OVED TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION / i`+a' I t, n •��.,++ �.r OF ANEW VIEW DECK brPr V f Lekt747.1417.‘t 71; 4=47 I PROJECT: Fagin Residence JOB NO : 0509 iFAItIII1i NTS N weYork,New York 10010 Mattituck, NY 11952 DRAWN BY: S T 212.675.2374 F 212.675.2375 PD- I 1/4 R C H I T E C T U R E Project Description DATE: 06.05.07 ! 11 • ‘1/4. tv k *LY1.ttettillE Town of Southold: Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 August 6, 2007 Re: Application of Adrienne Landau renovation & addition to existing - .\ _ residence at 855 Soundview Ave. Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Board members, p�J 81A°1 AUG 9 207 Q'° v fid- loo?1 Narofsky Architecture has prepared the following revised project description and diagram (see attached drawing) to help clarify the distances from the top of bluff to the existing & new structure. We have also indicated what portions of the ground floor structure will be built using breakaway construction (see solid black line labeled "H") detailed by the national flood insurance program, what portions will be demolished (see red dashed lines labeled "I") and what portion is new upper level construction redesigned landward of the top of bluff (see green dashed lines labeled "G"). The setbacks are as follows: Point A is located 40'-0" from the top of bluff. Point A is the location of a new structural pier supporting the cantilevered upper level. This is the closest point to the top of bluff for any structure supporting the new upper level. Point B is located 37'-0" +- from the top of bluff. Point B is the location of the existing southwest corner of the lower level foundation (to remain) as well as the corner of the upper level (which is to be cantilevered over the structural pier shown at point A) Point C is located 19'-6" +- from the top of bluff. Point C is the location of the existing northwest corner of the lower level foundation (to remain). Point D is located 33'-7" +- from the top of bluff. Point D is the location of our new lower level corner supported on the existing foundation. Line E is located 54'-0" +- from the top of bluff. Line E is the location of the lower level wood decking Point F is located 56'-8" +- from the top of bluff. Point F is the location of the closest point between the top of bluff and the new lower level slab on grade structure. We have also included, for reference, a 40'-0" top of bluff setback line, in order to show that virtually all of the new structures are located landward of that line. With the exception of a small portion of the corner of the upper level, only the rebuilt portion of the lower level falls within that 40'-0" setback. More importantly, as shown by the red dashed lines (labeled "I"), much of the existing lot coverage within the 40-foot setback is being removed. We have calculated that, presently, there are 749 square feet of the footprint located within the 40-foot setback. Of that 749 square feet, we are proposing to remove permanently 308 square feet (consisting of the deck and part of the first floor), thereby reducing the total footprint within the 40-f000t setback to 441 square feet. That is more than a 40% reduction of the lot coverage within the most sensitive 40-foot setback area. Thank you Stuart Narofsky, AIA 0( ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL, LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW 106 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (631) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER (631) 369-2065 P. O. Box 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 CARMELA M. Di TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK June 7, 2007 THEODORE D.SKLAR NANCY SILVERMAN LISA J. Ross MELISSA H. SIDOR Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 7 54375 Main Road N Southold,NY 11971 111 d 2007 • Re: Application of Adrienne Landau - ZBA File No. 6033 Premises: 855 Soundview Avenue Mattituck, New York SCTM No.: 1000-094.00-01.00-007.000 Dear Members of the Board: We received a copy of the May 16, 2007 letter from Thomas J. McMahon of the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District. Mr. McMahon reviewed the site as per the ZBA's request and his only suggestion was that a new sediment and erosion control plan be developed for the project. Specifically, he believed that the proposed placement of the staked hay bales and/or silt retention fence was incorrect. We shared Mr. McMahon's concerns with our surveyor, Joseph A. Ingegno, L.S. Upon consideration of Mr. McMahon's suggestions, Mr. Ingegno has prepared a revised sediment and erosion control plan for the project as shown on the attached survey. As the Board can see from the survey, instead of running a row of hay bales with silt fence generally parallel to the bluff line, the new plan takes advantage of the contours as per Mr. McMahon's suggestion and also continues the row of hay bales and silt fence along the eastern border of the property. We are prepared to implement Mr. Ingegno's revised plan as a condition of any approval from the Board. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Very.trnly yours, /bw Enclosures Anthd"ny C. Pasca 40'-0"TOP OF BLUFF A_ SETBACK LINE \_ A B H 1 G- .\ Fillj latat Ilka Ili 1M • 1 -17 1; / n 7- - 1 ,, ', ® TOP OF BLUFF I / I *-1- MISSIONIMISSION D r77-- I / / A _ --1-i) L.._Il ii i ----• . ' ��, F a • IgHs 1 ITT- cc/ r, I u i. G .. .. ••---, �.. ., . . FINISHED GRADE \CONC. COVER a ( � 1 O"L 1 4" OR 6" PVC PIPE v FROM GUTTER °RNNS \ /ODOM\PREC 4000 PSI O 20 DAYS --D 61•5�8�" SURVEY OF PROPERTY 20. otti. SITUATED AT /'1 S\E Utlytcy..2 px 1jl lF�'/ .� N. "�. MATTITUCK N ALL MD 3/C' - 1-1/Y' STONE O� ��IIN , W�� 191;4 i r 169 cf au ARGUND o TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �, f. lb' , .3�`i ° ti L Q 9 � � °� �° LEACHING RINGS SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK \%\ 1 V n 6�j 1�9 E� t 5 \ Wap 60 a min.) REINFORCED 0691 0120 DAYS (min.) I L JS.C. TAX No. 1000-94-01 —07 ` ,,S' ,�E or 'h� 2D P� SCALE 1 "=20' 6J WV`�,Na\EO 1H ,B J �'� 22 l N �P�D ,. 20 Q-. " NOVEMBER 18, 2005 e�°ll - - - ie c \ I FEBRUARY 2, 2006 ADDED PROPOSED HOUSE aW° aa" —3a . - JULY 31, 2006 REVISED PROPOSED HOUSE 13W9W ax 13-51 , 13 GOEO 13O ;% SC" - --sq S1ap9 -Ng APRIL 25,JUNE 1020007 7TLATH REVSEDOR SITE HAY BALE LINE.5 M N .A - �� _ -- -3J . E. �a1,P6 eD M `BOTTOM GROUND WATER a J P +o 03:01' TYPICAL D as 3 3 TYPICAL STORMWATER UNIT AREA = 31 ,772.62 sq. ft. 5l p`a�\yo5`qo.�g TOTAL STORAGE PER UNIT = 338 of (TO TIE LINE 0.729 ac. _ '�++ & BULKHEAD) �E cE ° j°� �- - / / / / - +s as"p`' p 6a, (NOT TO SCALE) 1aNC Y. e6 \ GO C.,NIO. dE 2 tio' / i e0° '4 qD# �• 25� "� / - - / �— - - — 52 ,\Y" CERTIFIED TO: 0 / - - - \�K EDWARD FAGIN o A % . �� - �G �`°x.P� HPfcc ANDRIENNE LANDAU / ... ' j 13` 52453,0\ �w����9q E+r'o'(<k6 JUN 8 2007 c toiL 5% • / �� / / / — -- __ 6a _ 51 y.1Pr�C�-� 7 ,>' / , 526 e P EXISTING LOT COVERAGE u._ Fe / —56 __St' r o / ' a - wcoD sTEPs - _ se 7. DESCRIPTION N 50- /� 56. �. 3x'° 09pp1Jh) HOUSE 1 ,167 sq. ft. 3.67% ® � µa13° DECH „oµo 66F5 �1rllNs A eo/ ���a. �� g, — .\ ± PATIO 836 sq. ft. 2.63% NOTES: of t� ����` ``\ POOL 512 sq. ft. 1 .61% 1 . ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM tD `ES, i EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: SOD 111PodiC0 \ EXISTING 1 STD• I` \ ti — y,(p.XJ ! R IS G I ST 0 ' 1' a pz DECKS 839 sq. H. 2.64% EXISTINGRsc0�T0UR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: — —sD— — \y��S,�O,AA. /(v // x ,! m y e FL GARAGE MOOR \01TNy �� , e\/ w "a " i� ��•� N�,1 TOTAL 3,354 sq. ft. 10.55X r0 TOP OF BULKHEAD ��... . O tlep \ m� 1R + pP + " ` cE c tst r+e BOTTOM OF BULKHEAD TT+\\? � WELL I.+n \T .. �` C '\'. 1�1"' r1µ/ , E Er TOP OF WALL P w BOTTOM OF WALL 0.\s'Icee 136E `' ' i ! � fat I O 2. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: .y1 ' FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 36103C0143 G i_ lon \A51111111‘.;,.; `� �" % PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE ZONE VE' COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCITY HAZARD (WAVE ACTION); ik , �� �� BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED S/✓ % DESCRIPTION AREA % LOT COVERAGE ZONE X. AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN 4,.,.,-40.401r 6 tee.- •�16 \ 8 •!� a HOUSE 3,100 sq. ft. 9.76% 3. MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK CAPACITIES FOR A 1 TO 4 BEDROOM HOUSE IS 1,000 GALLONS.ad- �G�J, ga 1 TANK; 8' LONG, 4'-3" WIDE, 6'-7" DEEP j.\sate ✓ , '�V \ '- q 'Sv PATIO 1 ,246 sq. f1. 3.92% 4. MINIMUM LEACHING SYSTEM FOR A 1 TO 4 BEDROOM HOUSE IS 300 sq ft SIDEWALL AREA. g \ ?; or; POLL 1 POOL; 12' DEEP, 8' dia. m \\ \ \ I ' ps" POOL 512 sq. ft. 1 .61 % OiOc vH, ��m' " �� vA, q0' v vice c1L' °O ® •�� PROPOSED EXPANSION POOL oz g H ��\0 `` aV A ,AAH s' \�_ 13T'�, - V DECK 93 sq. f}. 0.29X 'c. 1.473° ft -- cot \\, �� PROPOSED LEACHING POOL - \. ,Vs 7r �\ vI� Aon \o mov , , s, „!✓ \� CARPORT 439 sq. ft. 38X -i. mz \. ,q, \ g 591 A 4 11i v �z�iTOTAL 5,390 sq. ft. 16.96% �5f PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK z'^ \P \� `U . f � I \ 'y, 5. THE LOCATION OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND/OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. .\ 1 \ x.13 5t Ad \ \ oN800 009-‘-1- i 06. EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM STRUCTURES SHALL BE PUMPED CLEAN AND EITHER BE REMOVED OR G.j \ P m�,?,o cy�,�, i `\ \ \ PO'� P.x2' 0� FILLED WITH CLEAN SAND, IN ACCORDANCE WITH S.C.D.H.S. STANDARDS. \ sl ,'� \1' \ patR 7. PROPOSED 8' DIAMETER X 8' DEEP DRYWELLS FOR ROOF RUN-OFF: �\ �,T,E o ��' -\ \\ �P 8. LATH SET FOR SITE INSPECTION:b• _ F \ '� ' I '°-tea -� \ A 9. PICTURE LOCATIONS: R ' f_\ 603 tlNk .-o� ` \ ID i�w` 1 L2.1 - •VA ,). °� z4 i" A 'y' 0 �� � ��� IPS \\ �` oa .� . • � \� '� ®:\11) al ° �( pU p➢ Sr �3c a551 .+7 HOLE. . `.1 SA 4 PL'/ • • c3 N A•if �s TEST HOLE DATA A `✓` (TEST HOLE DUO BY McDONALD GEOSCIENCE ON OCTOBER 2r, 2005) PREPARED IN A /DANCE WITH THE MINIMUM •A ��� V < BY THE LLA.Ls/ 0 APPROVED ANO IGOPIEO `,� - • • Sq IDMOS TOR SURVElS AR ESTABOSHED Lk / • L&R DROWN LOAM of FOR SUCH US THE NEW YORK STATE ;AND �� �� //� A, -- V,' 1:,, , \\ - \ /d am �A\ a, e�m+ SANDY CLAY CL `M11� �f'.. 111 1 '"1N S �° • • • �' it ay,1d, ' . '1 .1',•i ,esS 'lti V 1 N.Y.S. Lic. No. 49668 O 5 PALL DROWN ME TO COARSE srxo SW UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR AOtl1NN k....,..:2 dL o- = e Q� ISSTATE Jos ph A. Ingegno 4 •• • A Se EDUCATION LAW. I PNt THE NOT 'G Land Surveyor .IPC EIMO55ED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSUMED TO BE A VNID TRUE COPY. WELL, IY cONLY TO OTTO TIE PERSON RN MHOLI THE SIF£Y IS PREPARED. AND ON HIS BENNE TO TIE Title Surveys - Subdivisions - 3ite MDIs - Construction Layout TIRE COMPANY. Ca Em E IT L AGENCY AM LOONS IISTOIRION USRD MM. NO . TO THE A4 GLES OF OE LIIRYIG RSI- PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 TURIN CERTIFICATIONS AW NOT TRNBERIUE- OFFICES LOCATED AT TAE/NG ADDRESS THE EXISTENCE OF RICHT OF WAYS 322 RO.YgKE AVENUE P0. Box 1931 ANY..ONNOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF RIVERHEAD. New Yoh 11901 Riverhead. New York 11901-0965 P` 25-4080 FINISHED GRADE \CONC. COVER '�,c - ^ Y L E "f 1 4" OR fi" PVC PIPE /S0UDDOM \ IAFROM GUIItR OPNNS \ E0N(�S1J \\ 00 PSICAST 28DAYSN LIN/ .�d , SURVEY OF PROPERTY t4. 2.0. \ L� 20. K SITUATED AT �� �E MAT TI TU CK ��+ W�5 tioNCG.X r At 169 cf ALL AROUND 4" - 1-I/2" STONE �5. � �� tial TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ' � � `)� SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK A: s L O9+ ...- ,044350. ' .14 3 D REINFORLEACCED PRECAST CONE.RINGS ,-D• tJ 10 6S F w (mm.1 (min') �. . oo- .` G Wim° 4S.C. TAX No. 1000-94-01 -07 N 65'51M AME ,- ..,- '- 20 1. .Y 4000 iss 0fxa DAYS SCALE 1 "=20' "1` .E "' �� �z22A 0, c_ ` NOVEMBER 1 8, 2005 '°' ala N -- — — -26 FEBRUARY B -JO •a / a� j, 1 2, 2006 ADDED PROPOSED HOUSE HOUSE aE 1,NE 41ic� • Ota — ,fid 1 E APRILL 25,Y 12 07 SET, 2006 �LATH FOR SITEISED DINSPECTION 1pv '1"5 NN' ♦ 11c. / ' - S _ — -- S4 SNap NSI JUNE 1, 2007 REVISED HAY BALE LINE D ga WR M BE_a / / /. �t, — — -36 AOC 15)�P BOTTOM GROUND WATER ,co_os ,‘„'t ;PtiPPOP TYPICAL STORMWATER UNIT AREA = 31,772.62 sq. ft. / aQs_o �„ TOTAL STORAGE PER UNIT = 338 cf L01 / - / ; ; / ; �6 �C. ed xoeutExaeno) 0.729 ac. 61U'� 146 .// ; �- - =s aPSt`p's"( 51V (NOT TO SCALE) 1NQn eN9 1Wi" 7 7� �� / / � �� �/ ��I ase # ota 10C 2 RD/ / ,; / - !. / ��/AI 1 UPC YN0 CO �I��� o D E � M1ry✓ / / / / i - - / / / W� Fd� aj ' - oSWI CERTIFIED TO: < �• i6/ / ; / 0 -- ss EDWARD FAGIN t. 3a/ / / ---76 SA, _ N1a <r$ ANDRIENNE LANDAU ti" / . / ;-/ / e�W" - psuN DN �yrhir- s tG 3s/ / / / / t_ _ — a1 'fSOS�' WD/ / / / // // / / _ s-,2,0*. -- 54 y<��r / j/ i / / / N "WRQ sa 04 EXISTING LOT COVERAGE E6 / / ys9, ils -( NO\)gE DESCRIPTION AREA % LOT COVERAGE / / / / / 4,R- _ WOOD stcas _se R el S 5ti ; / --- 'a�yb' �� �1° OSOpA91 HOUSE 1 ,167 sq. fi. 3.67% WOOD DECif 56 X954 1+11NG PS A y1. —. k�-� ,tea ( PATIO 836 sq. ft. 2.63% � *SAP" p/� ; �� w� � �' N` +\ POOL 512 sq. ft. 1.61% NOD . ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM t0snit-0W • \ EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:so.o — — — Ex15TING 1 sni �1 \` m _ EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: -- -50— — FR E H011$ .�,, z, DECKS 839sq. ft. 2.646 y , oefols ti. Iii--_. • FFI - FIRST ROOK StoHly�p1A f N d i1 F N1 TOTAL 3,354 sq. ft. 10.55% .eN - TOP aF BULKHEAD ,�1A� I� S I.10 ,i 6\ °W I ° $ �� _,ri y r"1 tit e e - BOTTOM OF BULKHEAD AZf\' w1WXl'� �\ I1AS%1 �I .1 1% 4' M N %St ,A r1W/ r o aW - BOTTOM OFLWAD_ W�_ °F.. �i7 a1 f tece Nytt a� kvc p6 6 1 ` 1. � i ��M 2. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: e0 r.1` 9" G. _ •�JF� A� ' FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. FROM:36103C0143 G 145'\ 0 ��>' SLC... 3- // PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE ZONE VE• COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCITY HAZARD (WAVE ACTION), vc 00, IA-S /� l BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED �,,� DESCRIPTION AREA % LOT COVERAGE _ ZONE X• AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. iortk ... 12 ,yfi HOUSE 3,100 sq. ft. 9.76% 3, MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK CAPACITIES FOR A 1 TO 4 BEDROOM HOUSE IS 1,000 GALLONS. 001. „ totbol. � 1 TANK; 8' LONG, 4'-3" WIDE, 6'-7" DEEP 15z11s c + ' \ P= • PATIO 1 ,246 sq. ft. 3.92% 4 MINIMUM LEACHING SYSTEM FOR A 1 TO 4 BEDROOM HOUSE IS 300 sq ft SIDEWALL AREA. 10 S \ \ ri@i 1+ 1 POOL; 12' DEEP, 8' dia. i AP N. 20 0111r9 g\\p 11 O, .m X3� ' POOL 512 sq. ft. 1 .61% `K t, / \ qd T l •v��ha u 0 to PROPOSED EXPANSION POOL .19/11949, t�;�o ' , „ \ s A� 131' N.` / DECK 93 sq. fi. 0.29X �/ PROPOSED LEACHING POOL o z, ft '- o. Y` 7 n x N `W�F•sti „ �� CARPORT 439 sq. ft. 38% •y TOTAL 5,390 sq. ft. 16.96X %/4 PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK Z tnN.. ' ' ` \ y5 Z' N ��� \ i2c i c zz _ U� to :EN: I I �+I 5D2, I \ 5 THE LOCATION OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD \ .'- 1 of I . 1 \ ^,5'E OBSERVATIONS AND/OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. g \ I -o r� 1\ \ \ 0 tifeteS6 EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM STRUCTURES SHALL BE PUMPED CLEAN AND EITHER BE REMOVED OR a T Ao t 'Q„ , 101 fr �`\ p1P ,<2 � FILLED WITH CLEAN SAND, IN ACCORDANCE WITH S.C.D.H.S. STANDARDDSS'.'�\\ \ a; x I As :� ' ,'s' 11 `\.10 7 PROPOSED 8' DIAMETER X B' DEEP DRYWELLS FOR ROOF RUN-OFF: t i1q� FatE \ o �' -' \ 1�� A LATH SET FOR SITE INSPECTION:► \\\ /F 6nE' '1i "IF 5 PICTURE LOCATIONS: Q�- 1V � �: LINK S � ,/ /l\, / N•: _ � �� .\� A \ • vaA 4 4. ° • 11 •I \ o, b .....>(,,,,, N • ° Pv� •� . /� •/ \ ,D{aC' _ hI, . ,til _ �► 5 ° n vii Cr 16T HDI£ \ N RS /s6, CO. (i ' JUN 82007 �° • ,• rya/ /�,�N�3 e • 4 • 33.. '--- . JYe ' / \ . L ° 0 a / / �� I %'� TEST HOLE DATA I \ ! 1 (TEST HOLE DUG BY McDONALO GEOSCIENCE ON OCTOB 27, 2005) PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM _ °, __.__.2 � a STANDARDS FOR TIME URVEYS AS ESABUSHED W, \ W '/ / /A (ARK 0. BPOWN LONA WE BY THE LIALS. AND 'PROVED AND ADOPTED , / cp „ \ •�••• i • • ��J/, 17 4 FDR SUCH USE BY NEW YORK STATE LAND TIRE A,$SOCtRi1• / • u• 1 ° . � � • °. / e6DWN senor cur a J ,,fir" v Oy0 N14/ 2-1 RA 0 i3 ' /��' a �, 1L1�. LI II i . . .• . , . , 1• ,ts' 1, . . °P,' • o., ..,-\_- /. '`+`-+- f-- :'"j N.Y.S. be No. 49668 / • '� rut BROWN FINE To WASE SAND SA UNMRIIORIZID AIT(FAII(ID OR ADDITION _ �'� •y, TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF • _ e O'( SECTION 7208 OF THE NEW YORK STATE Josep A. Ingegno • s (,moi, EWGTION LAW. Land H • ° • � 6 ) ('POS '- MSE UNO TM9JR:E'IDKS IS WIQ'D MAP SFILNOT BBIIING urveyor !� '4 _ EIDOSSID SERE slue NOT RE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY IT CERTIFICATIONS WED HEREON SINAI RON 1 WEV' ONLY . Mt ON FOR F T1 THE TWA Surveys - SLb&vmmaa - Ste Plan - Construction Layout ,111E COMMIE 6011 DIAL AGENCY M0 LENDING IISIOUIIRI LSIfD IEIEOR. MID TO THE AEsb'E6 OF 11C LEMI ISI- PHONE (631)727-2090 Fox (631)727-1727 TALON- CFFIEIGTGI6 ORE ROT TRANSFO Hr THE EXISTENCE OF 1041/T OF WAYS WTEEES LOCADD AT MAILING ADDRESS 322 NOA WO/OB EASEMENTS OF SECOND, IF WWE AVENUE P.O. Box 1931 ANY. NOT SHOWN ARE ICT GUARANTEED. BEAD. Mn Yak 11901 Krverteatl, NSI York 11901-091 25—a FAGIN / LANDAU RESIDENCE0509 ��C-E-T NEW CONSTRUCTION 855 SOU N ED \/ I EW AN/ E MATTITUCK , NV 1 1 952 SITE PLAN - BASED ON SURVEY PREPARED BY JOSEPH INGEGNO W/ NAROFSKY ARCHITECTURE DESIGN 1 " = 20'-0" ZONING INFORMATION - SECTION 94 BLOCK 1 LOT 7 DISTRICT R40 SOUND ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE LONG ISLANDN 67'57'30" E AREA = 31 ,772.62 sq. ft. • AREA OF SITE - 31,772 SQ. FT. 75.57 20.84 AE UNE ALONG (To TIE LINE 0.729 ac. ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE 20% OF 31,772 = 6,354 SQ. F.T N 78'09'14" 65,37'37" E & BULKHEAD) 2.63 N �= woo) IPPMEM! HIGH TIE UNE ALONG HIpH WAGER UNE EQUALS TML WEAI'NO FWOOD A(N D. R• STEPS µMEA MARK APPARENT HIGH Zit:a:EN-CONSULTM'IS. WATER mARX APPMENT HIGN TER NG W000 OUIXHG➢ n 7.1wri re _ - —70 ZONE VE (EL. 13) NOTES: PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE he — �' _ - 1 . ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM 5,390 SQ. FT. rourv0 caxc gpTTOM GF SLUFF�.@ �� ,2 ZONE x MON. 1.6•E. -,� EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: 50.0 — 14 to - -` EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: 50 ZONE VE (EL 15) o - 19 1F.FL. - FIRST FLOOR ALLOWABLE HABITABLE FLOOR AREA EXISTING HABITABLE FLOOR AREA PROPOSED HABITABLE FLOOR AREA 20 r•). ------ ZONE x _� z3 N G.FL. - GARAGE FLOOR NO RESTRICTION AS LONG AS LOT 1ST FLOOR - 1,167 SQ. FT. 1ST FLOOR - 1,699 SQ. FT. ,6 - 24 , T B. - TOP OF BULKHEAD COVERAGE IS MET TOTAL - 1,167 SQ. FT. 2ND FLOOR - 1,992 SQ. FT. z a$ � o 2° �� 28 26 - 6.8 - BOTTOM OF BULKHEAD LOFT FLOOR - 202 SQ. FT. 2 ^��� Lo 2. _ a m T.W. - TOP OF WALL TOTAL - 3,893 SQ. FT. 26 j y = B.W. - BOTTOM OF WALL ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA EXISTING BUILDING AREA PROPOSED BUILDING AREA p8 / i� �i aR 2. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM: o s0 �� a NO RESTRICTION AS LONG AS LOT HOUSE - 1,167 SQ. FT. HOUSE - 3,100 SQ. FT. _ FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 36103C0143 G COVERAGE IS MET PATIO - 836 SQ. FT. PATIO - 1,246 SQ. FT. 3a i o ZONE VE: COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCITY HAZARD (WAVE ACTION); 36 / �� 1 POOL - 512 SQ. FT. POOL - 512 SQ. FT. / __Jr.-- 1 9 %T.156 BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED r 38 I� ' ow s A Rag- --��a 54183 DECK- 839 SQ. FT. DECK - 93 SQ. FT. O 58_ ZONE X: AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. / a42s / - i,__,,p k 8H t. op.a OsI'LL No 3• MINIMUM SEPTIC TANK CAPACITIES FOR A 1 TO 4 BEDROOM HOUSE IS 1 ,000 GALLONS. TOTAL - 3,354 SQ. FT. CAR PORT- 439 SQ. FT. DECK 1 TANK; 8' LONG, 4'-3" WIDE, 6'-7" DEEP TOTAL - 5,390 SQ. FT. 46 //\ �FVs'\ ail 4. MINIMUM LEACHING SYSTEM FOR A 1 TO 4 BEDROOM HOUSE IS 300s ft SIDEWALL AREA. REQUIRED SETBACKS EXISTING SETBACKS PROPOSED SETBACKS / afi / ► a FOUND SONG 9 5U j I • :�•c M 0°•E 1 POOL; 12' DEEP, 8' dia. FRONT - 40'-0" FRONT - 173'-7" FRONT- 50'-0" (to proposed car port) 2 �j7. • SIDE - MIN 15'-O" ONE SIDE SIDE - E:19'-2.5" W:34'-O" SIDE - E:15'-9.5" W:19'-2.5" (existing) SEA Dtq 6a • AGGREGATE OF 35'-0" AGGREGATE OF 53'-2.5" AGGREGATE OF 35'-0" �5 1�G�j 56 �" k N sz vt$ s1LT ' PROPOSED EXPANSION POOL TOP OF SLOPE - 100'-0" TOP OF BLUFF - 19'-6" TOP OF BLUFF - NEW CONSTRUCTION o I 56 i ,N 'fir ROW NA'B Allam { LOCAspq OF MTN i bN,h, N• Gr, rr;P . ,GQ• G FAQM silei qo %1coss1RUC '�'I ��' I f�O(pp�Rr1!ECRqIN70 REMAIN 6° TO BEGING AT LEAST 1-0" BACK FROM * ti RREANAWAY AL"C:14. GUIDU�Ii �`�'tl'aW- ItE� 1p 1NE '`T� PROPOSED LEACHING POOL '� ��� 1Y �I I� Mex FOLLOW 62 F HGx WA EN (E p• up TOP OF BLUFF SETBACK LINE: (20'-6") ,.Ln ..4I _ i DETAILED BY THE NAnaNAL ,es. - • ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT - °�� a FLOOD RANGE PROGRAM) ��FI +�F F.poG �--- - s4 PROPOSED SEPTIC TANKwl�. C•' I �< 1 ! : 35'-0" TO MIDPOINT BETWEEN RIDGE 33'-7" NEW CON OCTION p� FROM �s,1, ti < sW BEGIN AT snus ,�, '\'•, :: .. .I: :k D. AND SOFFIT FROM NATURAL GRADE CRIDOEsTSINcru EAugDu L/ 1L�►� ;;�c _arsPROPOSED 8' DIA X 8' DEEP DRYWELLS FOR ROOF RUN-OFF \ /1, `4' � ' ;a� res ss 5. THE LOCATION OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD mu / P,m kA t-510'V W --I "° DRAWING SHEETS OBSERVATIONS AND/OR DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. ,� , ,. . ', ' �� PROPOSED 2 STORY HOUSE 6. EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM STRUCTURES SHALL BE PUMPED CLEAN AND BACK FILLED _- ,P, • • '• `l!w' 1 -- (4 BEDROOMS) 4'' L-- „ r 'Lean S. 4 WITH CLEAN SAND, IN ACCORDANCE WITH S.c.D.H.S. STANDARDS. T-1 CLIENT CONTACT INFORMATIOIN, SITE PLAN, S-1 FIRST FLOOR FRAMING & FOUNDATION PLAN 1 • _ °' 19'42�'°�c, I�`P}`ll,: '�II a .114 1811 IIs'-ei" 1 j — ZONING INFORMATION 5-2 SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLANR. — - w `fid •w100'-0' 40P OF .. s T- IN' I� I" L PROPOSED ARE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION T-2 NYS BUILDING CODES & NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS S-3 ROOF & LOFT FRAMING PLAN p,b ' BLUFF SETBACK5' MIN. Og ' [, A-1 DEMO PLAN S-4 CARPORT FOUND & ROOF FRAMING PLAN 2 Irr —� rnTLiS T HOL 1'A DA TL A-2 FOUNDATION SITE PLAN S-5 TIP. FOUNDATION DETAILS xo EXISTING CESSPOOLA-3 FOUNDATION PLAN S-6 TIP. STEEL DETAILS � ��� TO eE REMOVED _ JSITLII o° E (TEST HOLE DUG BY McDONALD GEOSCIENCE ON OCTOBER 27, 2005)G, v / / yo A-4 GROUND FLOOR PLAN S-7 TYP. FRAMING DETAILS 2 ti 5, -LvIN. N EIfl x�E ai oA-5 FIRST FLOOR PLAN S-8 SECTIONS i• 01/1 /01 YISED FOR PN"1 HEARING / //// DARK BROWN LOAM oL A-6 LOFT FLOOR PLAN S-9 NOTESminorm _ A-7 r"1/2P 1 1551E FOR BLDG PERMIT m JIr. O. nIN� 8A 8 EAST & NORTH ELEVATIONS 02 09/25/06 1551E FOR BID N �, A I O • .4 4 a a a BROWN SANDY CLAY CL A-9 WEST & SOUTH ELEVATIONS 01 10.14.05 ISSUE FOR PRELIM BLDG REV 3 A-10 SECTION 1 No-Date Issue Foy RELOCATE POOL n �I - pori. 56 EQUIPMENT — 4' A-11 SECTION 2 IA-12 EXTERIOR VIEWS -. ,. Ii 1 • k .��.I�� GGL S- / Mx 1E51/ ____ , n )rij 4N s A. or=o UL i LE no ;H 5% PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM lti-Pol O, 1 ° s pmt ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN a® V k I'k il '-ICE OPTION: I�wE� W N O �- :0 0' N ENTRY 'I �I PR PALE BROWN FINE TO COARSE SAND sw #\1T 4 West 22nd Street, 5th Floor sz EObI ,p� o CON ORATION APPxGAMAEW6LL New York, NY 10010 b ���--� LGrwnoN LQ� / ii D' L� k PRICE OP *ON: T 212.675.2374 F 212.675.2375 `"• n •' ,. \ NEW CARP ,�4, d Project Title: m .: S", a Gorr/ - )- " PROPOSED 8' a X 2' DEEP DRYWELL W� \�p FAGIN / LANDAU \e / I .II ,a 0 B FOR ROOF RUN-'FE e RESIDENCE _ !• ; I' , : i p 17, ` 'p�1Aw''`C 855 SOUNDVIEW AVE. T y ' .� % ' ': •,IxmPpspp DR( At �a � ' ' � � �s PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM MATTITUCK, t- canal " W sv"- STANDARDS FOR TITLE SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED NY 11952 � .• E�,:F,^'F .7/-''r No�•M�13 BY THE L.I.A.L.S. AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED ,p,Y ,,,I/ / *. 'OGEE a,\(.5 '�f" ' •,e •` W FOR SUCH USE BY THE NEW YORK STATE LAND e• °� I / g TITLE ASSOCIATION. k ' • •7° /8 PRICE OPTION: t I 4 '\ NEW GRAVEL DRIVEWAY k-sg, � ,• UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION •\ / .• LA TO THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF v+ . I . / 4ol � I0 SECTION 72D9 DF THE NEW YORK STATE� "' 0' �', ° EDUCATION LAW. DraWing Title: ?• . 7c e0b` k a0 / COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARINGClient Contact Info, Site Plan IC\�\ e5. Q - - THE LAND SURVOR'S INKED SEAL OR Zoning Calculations �' 0 EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED TO BE A VALID TRUE COPY. CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN WLL !:aa'w•. ' Drawing NumberONLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY Job No.:24- I .,____S 41 IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE 0509.00 �• IyyERHFAU WIRES se 3+ • ° TITLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AND Scale: -",- `• �J,pnoN I LENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HEREON, AND - WELL - GONG. - a :rJ1'00,1 - - TO THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI- y- As Noted T. 1 <. -5'- I x ' ��-�TT TE TUTION. CERTIFICATIONS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. B 1v lJ e . DI N 7 \ Mega" ° Tl aV 1EAV THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS Date: 10.03.05 S0�N 1J AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, IF These p ars are an eslrlalent of service and are ANY, NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED. the properly Gr the ArLhiLeo I Any Ir'rringerer L9 4 sc "dt me , o tea, / I= CJ=_CT NCR-I I General Notes I LOCATION AT TOP OF SLUFF THAT 15 CLOSEST TO NEW CONSTRUCTION 1 I 6 +- TO Gp UP - .0-Ao kfe¢ i_,-m°-pN� ZO NICJS pFP t. EXISTING SIDE YARD PROPE-TY SETBACK LINE - 19'-2.5" ♦.� 70P OF BLUFF i, =IIIMN —' //� TOP OF BLUFF LINE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION I, `C :: :; SETBACK LINE ABOVE TO BE BUILT ON i _STRUCTURAL STEEL PIERS —�_ I1 WigOLIM PLOCATION OF EXISTING XICE OPTION: END E Odif • CORNER i0 REMAIN EXISTING POOL TO BE SQUARED OFF AND NEW VINYL I LINER IS TO BE INSTALLEDmit , '' �— LOWER LEVEL EXTERIOR i IllO` " , WALLS (INDICATED WITH i, GUEST BEDROOM I e GR FOLLOLW THE — // B- - AWAY WALL N SIIIIII �� PAINTING STUDIO / TTHOE NATIONAL FLOODiktEilS - .!'11:-::',11:4141141141;n: , �� Ir� �t, �� L�1 __�/- INSURANCE --OGRAMOr Ma lif - / (FIA-T5-9) a t �f it a'-'aMIEIMI CarliS I=NINS '4 \,40$ , 1 linelhaw .a-e. _1 1 $1511!? RO� \ ,- ■ _ �- - S —' =IM , ile-_-4.111111111111I DARK DASHED LINE REPRESENTS PERIMETER OF 01 07.13.07 REVISED FOR PH#2 HEARING PREVIOUS DESIGN No Date Issue I I CAS IT WAS REVIEWED AT THE PREVIOUS HEARING) / r11 EXTERIOR COVERED WOOD PECKING I EXTERIOR WOOD PECKING aill -- TIPa ' ARCHITECTURE - 4 West 22nd Street, 5th Floor - II. New York, New York 10010 .I_9. rm... - T 212.675.2374 F 212.675.2375 HOT TUB = Project Title: I 1111.Iiii i SIIIM Ell: Fagin / Landau Res. il •___ ■ ■ ■■■� ■� 855 Soundview Ave. 111.111111.1111111111.11111.1.11110 Mattituck, NY 11952 2. 11011iiiiiiiiiii.---ogiim . : saiirar I - in I- Drawing Title: LAUNDRY 1�FOWDER I _ - i ROOM BROOM 2 STUDY / HOME OFFICE i Ground Floor Plan I ++ GUEST BEDROOM 2 1 `. OE _ Job No: Drawing Number: _ 0509 , • • ■—_ • III—.�■ J Scale: 1/4"=1'-g�, AA _ _ — _ — _ — _ _ _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ _ _ — _ — _ — _ — _ _ _ — _ _ _ — _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ — _ _ — _ — _ — _ — _ — _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - _ -� - - _ SIDE YARD PROPERTY SETBACK LINE- IS'--95" _ _ _ — _ — _ — _ _6y: __ ,devise® Ground = Icor Plan Date: Scale : 1/4" = I'-m° 07.13.07 This plan is an instrument of service and is the property of the Architect.Any infringements will be prosecuted. IPFC. CT Iil General Notes I LOCATION AT TOP OF BLUFF THAT IS CLOSEST TO NEW CONSTRUCTION Il x\9(\N OEyCnt� 0��0`� Or�S��� \,:l O? PR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ EXISTING SIDE YARD PROPE-TY SETBACK LINE - 19'_2.5" L � '� It�\ TOP OF BLUFF LIN£ OF NEW CONSTRUCTION TOP OF BLUFF TO BE BUILT ON STRUCTURAL SETBACK LINE STEEL PIERS IrAge • ''- NEW CONSTRUCTION IS TO MASTER ` BEGIN R LEAST IM TOP OF BATHROOM \ SLOPEACK FSETBACK LOINE PRICE OPTION: END OF EXISTING FOOL TO BE �_ CORNER OF EXISTING ill t LOFF AND NEW VINYL II 'RI* STRUCTURE TO REMAIN LINER INES IS IS TO BE INSTALLED \ 'MASTER BEDROOM ' i. MA5¢ER I 1 CLOSET R Y� L • L__-J EXTERIOR DECK _ — 11111,11rikj!' yhr _ �__________ IIN - • _ E 1 , r7� ----- -1 i - — ❑ D _ _ � �V:1,,,,[ir F:_-1_::j Itli IIII I dr .' , ri __j _ I 01 0713.07 REVISED FOR PH#2 HEARING 1 , L J DARK DASHED LINE REPRESENTS PERIMETER OF No Date Issue V PREVIOUS DESIGN �' 1 (AS IT WAS REVIEWED AT THE PREVIOUS HEARING) I —/— ARCHITECTURE -��■ 4 West 22nd Street, 5th Floor ■1 New York, New York 10010 Wit— T 212.675.2374 F 212.675.2375 Project Title: \ ) . . Fagin / Landau Res. ENTRY 855 Soundview Ave. LIVING ROOM Mattituck, NY 11952 . ', r---1 r . I KITCHEN Drawing Title: L t _I First Floor Plan / nd _ - r- t T°T \ \N— j POWpR////-- Job No: Drawing Number. ‘\ �i 1 ROOM ---��-`I _ Scale: �I{ / ` j f l 0509 1' 1 I L I I I. ( 1/4"_ 1'-0�� _ - _ - l� _ _ - By A.5 l�e v s s o s t o o r Flo' SIDE YARD PROPERTY SETBACK LINE- 15'-9.5' Scale : I/4" = l'-m" Date: 07.13.07 This plan is an instrument of service and is the properly of the Architect.Any infringements will be prosecuted. ti )a•\b� ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL, LLP P1 1COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET r^rL � GV" /k P. 0. Box 279 Nl 4,_01-11- �J�/6.31- RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS _ ,� (631) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER l( J MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER(631)369-2065 P. O. BOX 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 CARMELA M. DI TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C PASCA July 19, 2007 NICA B. STRUNK THEODORE D. SKLAR NANCY SILVERMAN LISA J Ross MELISSA H. SIDOR Hand Delivered Linda Kowalski Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application of Adrienne Landau ZBA File No. 6033 Premises: 855 Soundview Avenue Mattituck, New York SCTM No.: 1000-094.00-01.00-007.000 Dear Ms. Kowalski: We are submitting seven(7) copies of the following documents for the Zoning Board's consideration: 1) letter dated July 18, 2007 from Stuart Narofsky to the Zoning Board to describe proposed revisions to the project; 2) color coded drawing showing proposed changes to foot print and set backs; 3) revised site plan and floor plans showing proposed changes and; 4) guidelines for"breakaway" construction. As we discussed at the prior hearing with the Board, these revisions are submitted in an attempt to address some of the Board's concerns raised at the hearing. The applicants would accept an approval from the Zoning Board as conditioned on making the changes to the plans as described in Mr. Narofsky's July 18, 2007 letter and his accompanying drawings. Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact me. Very t o. yours, Antho'y C. Pasca /bws Enclosures ' ., ..ARCHITE'CTU(2E, Town of Southold: Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 July 18, 2007 Re: Application of Adrienne Landau renovation & addition to existing residence at 855 Soundview Ave. Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Board members, Narofsky Architecture has prepared the following revised project description and diagram (see attached drawing) to help clarify what portions of the structure will be built using breakaway construction' detailed by the national flood insurance program, what portions will be demolished and what portions are new construction redesigned landward of the top of bluff. As illustrated in the diagram, the blue lines along with the red lines create the perimeter of the existing residence, 1,162 square feet over a partial basement containing mechanical equipment and crawl space. The proposed design modifies the east side of the existing structure by demolishing approximately 477 square feet, represented by the dashed red lines, of the existing residence in order to open up the view towards the sound, from the front yard. The existing structure's gable roof is to be removed to allow construction of the main floor level and a new view deck, accessed from the new • master bedroom and living room. This viewing deck area is represented by the grey hatch. Added behind and to the east of the existing structure is a new steel frame addition consisting of guest and mechanical rooms on grade level (no new basement or crawl space is proposed) and living and master bedroom space on the upper floor, represented by the black solid line. In the previous design, as it was reviewed by the board on June 28th, the master bedroom wing was located 28'-4" +- from the top of bluff, as illustrated by the green dashed line. In the revised design, as it will be reviewed by the board on August 2nd, the master bedroom wing has been relocated to 37'-0" +- from the top of bluff, as illustrated by the solid black line. All of the new construction is proposed landward of the existing structure and existing top of bluff setback line. Thank you Stuart Narofsky, AIA I , I EXISTING STRUGtURE I „ Ik. TO G'RNEf fL t—-D 5IGN Y ,-0 \p t011E�. UPPER �O GO� �O�S\f. \ TOP OF BLUFF ' i.-- � ice__--_—_ - I EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED - '-';'",,-;•,;::,,,,,,:,,•:,i' }} TOP OF BLUFF APPROXIMATELY 411 SQUARE FEET \\ "` _:„4:%:,''.:':,,,,\ �'''i�'-%4: :,,..:,•:,..•.'-,==• . SETBACK LINE LOWER LEVEL EXTERIOR WALLS TO -- = •;:" -;•,--",-;,...•`;,--,;"-.+7,:;',..,.-77: FOLLOW TI-IE BREAKAWAY WALL „ ••,',`":\-,'•-•--_••1:.,:,;,••••••,::-.z.••?„ '-, =n":',..'-'•'-'7,;,:s",;4•--'1 . CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES DETAILED '-{j`:": , oUP)L 03 ' tKank PO ';. ; Technical c Bulletin . ,Fy9-99 „-. ,„,,,,,,,3),:)., ,,..za :� Design and Construction Guidance for Breakaway Walls Below Elevated Coastal Buildings in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program iiiilliatill ,,..--- �" Fill i '-c-.. _.,,_ 1 ,_,.,Z__-'7----711?-----------Iri- ___T , i ------ -----, i - , , _ i ..._I, ._,_........ , , , , - - _ „ 1 w- ........._ ......._ ..._____ , , , , .. . . i 4if,c-67-1-,, ;:..e... t '054:O ? , FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FIA-TB-9 f11 i'TliIriro s' ;0, , e MITIGATION DIRECTORATE4,_ 4. ,�; (9/99) Key Word/Subject Index This index allows the user to locate key words and subjects in this Technical Bulletin. The Technical Bulletin User's Guide(printed separately)provides references to key words and subjects throughout the Technical Bulletins.For definitions of selected terms,refer to the Glossary at the end of this bulletin. Key Word/Subject Index Page Breakaway wall,failure modes 6, 7 Breakaway wall,insurance considerations 13 Breakaway wall,NFIP regulatory requirements 1, 3 Breakaway wall,requirement for construction with flood-resistant materials 1, 12 Breakaway wall,specifications for NFIP-compliant construction 3, 4 Breaking wave,impact on vertical surface 5 Insect screening,for below-building enclosures 4 Latticework;for below-building enclosures 4 Any comments on the Technical Bulletins should be directed to: Federal Emergency Management Agency Mitigation Directorate Program Policy and Assessment Branch 500 C Street, SW. Washington,DC 20472 Technical Bulletin 9-99 replaces Technical Bulletin 85-3(draft), Breakaway Walls. Wave design on cover based on the Japanese print The Great Wave Off Kanagawa,by Katsushika Hokusai (1760—1849),Asiatic Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. TECHNICAL BULLETIN 9-99 Design and Construction Guidance for Breakaway Walls Below Elevated Coastal Buildings in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program Introduction In Coastal High Hazard Areas(Zones V,VE,and V1-30),the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)regulations require that communities participating in the program adopt floodplain management ordinances or laws requiring that all new and substantially improved buildings be elevated to or above the base flood elevation(BFE)on foundations consisting of piles,posts,piers, or columns.These open foundations must be designed to allow waves and water moving at high velocity to flow beneath the building.Local ordinances or laws adopted by participating communities must further require that the area below the lowest floor of the elevated building be left free of obstructions.Walls or other obstructions below the elevated building can significantly increase the potential for flood damage to the elevated building by increasing the surface area subject to wave impact and velocity flow during a coastal storm. Although obstructions are prohibited,the area below the lowest floor of an elevated building in a Coastal High Hazard Area may be enclosed with open wood latticework,insect screening,or non- supporting"breakaway"walls(see Figure 1).However,each of these must be designed and constructed to collapse under wind and water loads without causing collapse,displacement,or other structural damage to the elevated portion of the building or supporting foundation system.In addition,like all other construction in the Special Flood Hazard Area,any enclosure below the lowest floor of an elevated building must be built with flood-resistant materials and with methods and practices that minimize flood damage.Furthermore,the area below the lowest floor of the elevated building may be used only for parking,building access,or storage. Specific design requirements are included in the NFIP regulations for breakaway walls.More recent research on breakaway walls performed for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)and the National Science Foundation by North Carolina State University and Oregon State University evaluated the failure mechanisms(see Further Information on page 14 of this bulletin).The research included full-scale,laboratory wave-tank tests of breakaway wall panels. This bulletin describes prescriptive design details that comply with the requirements of the NFIP regulations and that may be used by design professionals as an alternative to the performance requirements listed in the regulations. 1 ...._ n - -� ' =__ �� aim!! muff � _.� _,11 innwinson l Floor Joists 1\ o0 O • O Floor J Support , ;" Beam Breakaway Breakaway • Wall Wall '.-2-Vertical , - Foundation Member Figure 1 Area enclosed by breakaway walls below an elevated building. 2 NFIP Regulations Section 60.3(e)(4)of the NFIP regulations states that the community shall: "Provide that new construction and substantial improvements'in Zones V1-V30, VE, and also Zone V if base flood elevation data is available on the community's FIRM,are elevated on pilings and columns so that(i)the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member of the lowest floor(excluding the pilings or columns)is elevated to or above the base flood level;and(ii)the pile or column foundation and structure attached thereto is anchored to resist flotation,collapse and lateral movement due to the effects of wind and water loads acting simultaneously on all building components. Water loading values shall be those associated with the base flood. Wind loading values used shall be those required by applicable State or local building standards. A registered professional engineer or architect shall develop or review the structural design specifications and plans for the construction,and shall certify that the design and methods of construction to be used are.in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting the provisions of paragraphs(e)(4)(i)and(ii)of this section." Section 60.3(e)(5)further states that a community shall require: ":..that all new construction and substantial improvements within Zones V1-V-30, VE, and Von the community's FIRM have the space below the lowest floor either free of obstruction or constructed with non-supporting breakaway walls,open wood lattice- work,or insect screening intended to collapse under wind and water loads without causing collapse,displacement,or other structural damage to the elevated portion of the building or supporting foundation system.For the purpose of this section,a breakaway wall shall have a design safe loading resistance of not less than 10 and no more than 20 pounds per square foot. Use of breakaway walls which exceed a design safe loading resistance of 20 pounds per square foot(either by design or when so required by local or State codes)may be permitted only ifa registered profes.sional engineer or architect certifies that the designs proposed meet the following conditions:(i)Breakaway wall collapse shall result from a water load less than that which would occur during the base flood;and(ii) The elevated portion of the building and supporting foundation system , , shall not be subject to collapse,displacement,or other structural damage due to the effects of wind and water loads acting simultaneously on all building components (structural and non-structural). Water loading values used shall be those associated with the base floorl Wind loading values used shall be those required by applicable State or local building standards.Such enclosed space shall be useable solely for parking of vehicles,building access,or storage." Technical Bulletins provide guidance on the minimum requirements of the NFIP regulations. State or local requirements that exceed those of the NFIP take precedence.Design professionals should contact community officials to determine whether more restrictive State or local regulations apply to the building or site in question.All applicable standards of the State or local building code must also be met for any building in a flood hazard area. 3 Below-Building Enclosure Options Compliant With the Regulations According to Section 60.3(e)(5)of the NFIP regulations,areas below elevated buildings in Coastal High Hazard Areas(Zones V1-V-30,VE, and V)may be enclosed in one of two ways: (1)with insect screening or open latticework or(2)with breakaway walls. Insect Screening and Open Latticework Insect screening and open latticework below elevated buildings are not considered obstructions as long as they meet the performance requirements of Section 60.3(e)(5)of the NFIP regulations.To increase the likelihood that the screen or latticework will collapse as intended,without transferring loads to the building or its foundation,this bulletin recommends that the vertical framing members on which the screen or latticework is mounted(such as 2 x 4's)be spaced at least 2 feet apart. Either metal or synthetic insect screening is acceptable.Lattice is available in 4'x 8' sheets in wood or plastic.The material used to fabricate the lattice should be no thicker than 1/2 inch,and the finished sheet should have an opening ratio of at least 40 percent.(Although Section 60.3(e)(5) specifies wood lattice,plastic lattice is acceptable as long as it meets the requirements listed above.) Breakaway Walls Section 60.3(e)(5)of the NFIP regulations requires that breakaway walls either(1)be constructed to meet prescriptive criteria for resistance to wind and water loads or(2)be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect. Walls Meeting the Prescriptive Criteria According to NFIP performance criteria for breakaway walls,any wall with a designed safe working resistance of not less than 10 and not more than 20 pounds per square foot(psf)is considered a breakaway wall and does not require certification by an engineer or architect. Previous NFIP design guidance,in the 1986 edition of FEMA's Coastal Construction Manual, specified standard stud wall panels placed between pilings or other vertical foundation members, but connected to the building only at the top and bottom of the panel with a specific number of fasteners intended to restrict the capacity of the wall to the 10-to 20-psf range.Higher loads will cause a failure at the top or bottom connections.Breakaway walls built according to this previously developed guidance continue to be compliant with the NFIP performance criteria. Walls Requiring Certification In many coastal areas,local building codes include wind design requirements that exceed the 20- psf maximum described above.NFIP performance criteria allow for construction of breakaway walls that meet these wind requirements.Breakaway walls with capacities higher than 20 psf are permitted if an engineer or architect certifies that(1)the wall will collapse before base flood conditions are reached and(2)the elevated building will not be damaged by combined wind and flood loads on all building components.The remainder of this bulletin presents a prescriptive description of breakaway walls that meet the two certification conditions based on more recent research. 4 Wave Forces and Rising Storm Surge The results of previous breakaway wall analyses,which served as the basis of recommendations in the 1985 edition of FEMA's Coastal Construction Manual,assumed design flood conditions and oscillating(non-breaking)wave conditions.The more recent research conducted by North Carolina State University and Oregon State University assumed two significant differences to better model coastal storms:breaking waves and rising water levels with time.In addition,full-scale wall panels were tested in a wave tank at Oregon State University to confirm the theoretical results. The severity of the flood hazard in V zones and coastal A zones is greater than that in non-coastal A zones,primarily because of the presence of breaking waves,which generally do not occur in non-coastal A zones.As a breaking wave passes a piling foundation or other open foundation,the structure experiences an oscillating,high-velocity flow that peaks at the wave crest,just as the wave breaks.While there are drag forces on the foundation,most of the flow under the building is undisturbed,making open foundations a manageable design.When a breaking wave hits a vertical surface,the effect is quite different.When the crest of a breaking wave impacts a vertical surface,a pocket of air is trapped and compressed by the wave(see Figure 2).As the air pocket collapses,an exceedingly high-pressure burst is placed on the wall,centered around the stillwater level.For example,peak pressures from a 5-foot breaking wave can be 100 times higher than the 10-to 20- psf range specified in the NFIP regulations. Wave Crest � I Stillwater Elevation —� Trapped Air Vertical Compressed by Wave Surface Ground-7 Figure 2 Impact of breaking wave on vertical surface. 5 The research found that standard wood stud wall construction withstructural wood sheathing failed after being hit by several breaking waves averaging 2 feet in height.Those conditions will occur early in the storm when the stillwater depth is approximately 2 feet.Although the forces acting on the wall are high,they can be expected to act close to the ground,where much of the force is transferred into the ground or to the foundation near the ground.Therefore,prior to failure, the forces transferred to the elevated building by the breakaway wall can be minimized. The full-scale tests conducted as part of the research showed that wood-frame breakaway walls designed to meet high-wind conditions will fail reliably at the connection between the bottom plate of the wall and the floor(see Figure 3a).The tests showed that the failure begins with the bowing and gradual displacement of the bottom plate(see Figure 3b)or a similar secondary failure beginning with the central studs of the breakaway wall.Wood-frame breakaway walls built according to the criteria presented in the following section of this bulletin are expected to fail in this manner.In addition,the tests demonstrated a secondary failure mode that occurs if the bottom plate of the wall fails to break away.In that situation,failure will occur at the connection between the bottom plate of the wall and the bottom of each wall stud,with little increase in capacity(see Figure 4).The conclusion of the research is that wood-frame breakaway walls will fail well before they transfer excessive loads caused by higher wave forces to the elevated building or foundation. 11 Vertical I Wave Forte `�,II Foundation , \Y�J Member WaCst ' , ,, 1 / ,/ Wave Heigveht , Approximately re2' Intenor ', Stillwater Sheathing Position of ;; Elevation Breakaway Wall i Breakaway ,, Wall '' Vertical Breakaway '; Foundation 1 Exterior Wall Bowed '' Member Inward by i i � Sheathing Wave Load ; Concrete Slab \ Bottom Plate , Ground NA ►� ' -Failure of Nails ///,// t.Ort 0o°!'8.°-..02:,5:p_....t: < Holding Bottom p o , 6.04!=-6,,„a ,, 4.D.P Q o Plate to Floor . Failure of Connection Between Breakaway Wall Bottom Plate and Floor (a) (b) side view plan view Figure 3 Expected failure mode of wood-frame breakaway wall based on full-scale testing—side view(a)and plan view(b). • 6 Wave Force, \Y, Y Wave Crest I ( Wave Height Approximately 2' Interior Sheathing Stillwater Elevation - , Wall Breakaway Vertical Foundation Member Exterior Sheathing Exterior and Interior Failure of Nails Sheathing Broken at Holding Studs to , I I Bottom of Breakaway Bottom of Plate - Wall Studs Ground �, ___---- -� ����� I 1 - ///�`Y// Concrete po:v-ooa000 94•1,P-°•••4g . Slab Bottom Plate Failure of Connection Between Bottom of Breakaway Wall Studs and Breakaway Wall Bottom Plate Figure 4 Secondary failure mode of wood-frame breakaway wall as determined from full-scale testing. Breakaway walls consisting of unreinforced masonry are expected to fail at the mortar joints between the masonry units,beginning near the stillwater level(see Figure 5),where the pressure on the wall is greatest. .0 0. •`• �o a Vertical oa �, v, Foundation Member ?• P 0 0- k 40 Wave Crest • .� 4� Hollow Concrete 0 Y .� �r Masonry Units Xoo= Are Ungrouted . •b. Wave ° o .a 4 Height Approximately 21 0. P . 4' 0' 0 �o I oa •o 0 o Breakaway Wall Constructed of 0.o 0'1* o' Unreinforced, Hollow Concrete Stillwater 1 00 0.0 , 4, Masonry Units Elevation \ (Units Not to Exceed 8" • , o inI 0 Thickness) oa i a' 40 ;, 0 •p 40 4. 0 Ground Qv as Concrete Slab po.p..o.�oo� P:.o Q. o A. pp pn o Do Figure 5 Expected failure mode of unreinforced masonry breakaway wall. Prescriptive Breakaway Wall Criteria Design and Construction A professional designer may specify a breakaway wall with a capacity outside the 10-to 20-psf range using the following specifications. 1. The building must be elevated on a piling or other open foundation designed to withstand wind and water loads acting simultaneously and any other loads prescribed by applicable State or local building codes or other applicable laws,ordinances,or regulations. 2. Breakaway walls shall be designed to meet or exceed all applicable building code requirements for wind,earthquake,and other criteria. 8 3. The floors of areas enclosed with breakaway walls are assumed to be soil or unreinforced concrete slabs less than 4 inches thick.An unreinforced concrete slab has no wire mesh or steel rods.Floor slabs shall not be structurally attached to the pilings or other vertical foundation members. - 4. Breakaway wall panels may be attached to the pilings or other vertical foundation members,elevated floor support beams,or slab floor with nails or other comparable- capacity fasteners(see Figure 6).All four sides of the wall panel may be attached to the foundation and elevated building.High-capacity connectors such as bolts,lag screws,metal straps,or hurricane fasteners(e.g.,clips or straps)shall not be used. 5. The exterior sheathing on breakaway wall panels placed between pilings or other vertical foundation members may overlap and be attached to the vertical foundation members. 6. Breakaway walls may be constructed as continuous,non-bearing walls,attached to the floor and elevated floor joists,with or without attachment to the pilings or other vertical foundation members. 7. Breakaway wall sheathing and siding may overlap and attach to elevated floor beams and joists provided a separation joint is present to prevent damage to the sheathing or siding of the elevated building if the breakaway wall collapses(see Figure 7).As shown in Figure 7, separation joints shall be fitted with a watertight seal that prevents wind-driven rain water and sea spray from entering the building envelope. 8. Utilities,including electrical wiring,breaker boxes,power meters,plumbing,conduits,and ventilation ducts,shall not be placed in or on a breakaway wall panel.Building supply lines and other utility line components,such as light switches or electrical outlets,may be attached to pilings or other vertical foundation members as allowed by applicable building codes and floodplain management ordinances and laws(which generally require that utilities be elevated above the BFE).If utility lines must be routed into or out of an area enclosed by breakaway walls,one or more of the walls shall be constructed with a utility blockout(see Figure 6).Utility lines that pass through the blockout will be independent of the walls and therefore will not be damaged if the wall panel breaks away under flood or wind loads. 9. Breakaway wall panels shall be positioned such that on failure,they do not collapse against cross-bracing or threaten other foundation components:, 10. Standard residential garage doors may be considered breakaway panels.Although these doors were not tested,published loading capacities for garage doors are comparable to the ultimate capacity for the tested breakaway walls(55 psf). 11. Because enclosures below buildings in V zones must be constructed with breakaway walls that meet the performance requirements of the NFIP regulations,flood vents or openings are not required for such enclosures.Note:Numerous State and local governments require openings in breakaway walls.See your local building official or floodplain administrator for further information. 9 Floor Support Beam 4"Wide Utility Blockout(Created With Extra Studs, Breakaway as Shown,or With Wall 6"Blocks) \\Z/ '-' Top Plate Vertical Foundation ' Member Gap Between 1 -- Sheathing Wall and Vertical / Foundation Member (Optional) —, Breakaway Stud (Not to Exceed 2"x4") '11 24"or ftWider -� Breakaway Wall ►— Bottom Plate - 4 1 T 1 %6 °b:•`1 o '''c.' z,•;••9 ,;°: .,,e':-� odap o•:9 •D t.o+o o•Q:p,I.-oma.o ; // ..) i ( //k)7/ -Expected Point of Failure(see Figure 3). ' Connections made with nails or comparable-capacity fasteners only. Concrete Slab Grade Beam or) Do not use high-capacity fasteners Not Connected to Unreinforced (e.g., bolts, lag screws, hurricane straps). Vertical Foundation Concrete Slab Member Secondary Point of Failure(see Figure 4). Connections made with nails or comparable-capacity fasteners only. Do not use high-capacity fasteners (e.g., bolts,lag screws,hurricane straps). Figure 6 Typical wood-frame breakaway wall construction. 10 • House Walls andSeparation Joint Breakaway Walls -\-i , (See Cutaway Detail) Covered with Stucco . ' IEnclosed Area Lath for A V House WallHouse Sheathing Stucco ���♦♦♦�♦��` Watertight Separation Lath ��♦j� � ♦♦♦♦ ♦��' _�Sheathing ♦♦ ♦ Joint at Bottom of . . Lowest Horizontal • ♦ Structural Member 14 in Accordance with \ r i • ♦ Stucco-Covered Local Codes • House Wall Beam liNon-Breakaway �♦ Construction �W ♦4 Separation f► Joint Breakaway ,♦ `� � Construction ♦ ! 11, ♦j Stucco-Covered i'�� ♦ Breakaway / ♦ ♦♦� Wall Stucco,Lath, pill"- Breakaway �♦ J► and Sheathing Wall �♦ � Discontinuous Framing Breakawa Wall ♦♦♦ • at Separation )r() Members Framing ��!�♦♦• ���� JointMembers �� ♦�j♦ ♦�•� ♦ Vertical Vertical •'♦�•♦•♦•�♦••' I Foundation Member Foundation Member III Breakaway Wall A .1 Sheathing Section AA Flood-Resistant , Lath for Breakaway Wall Figure 7 Separation joint between sheathing and wall covering(e.g.,stucco,siding)on house walls and breakaway walls. . 11 Construction Materials As explained in FEMA Technical Bulletin 2-93,Flood-Resistant Materials Requirements for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas,construction materials used below the BFE must be resistant to flood damage."Flood-resistant"construction materials are those capable of withstanding direct and prolonged contact(i.e.,at least 72 hours)with floodwaters without suffering significant damage(i.e.,damage requiring more than cleanup or low-cost cosmetic repair, such as painting).The requirement for flood-resistant construction materials applies to breakaway walls. In addition,except where heavier materials are required by the local building code,construction materials used for breakaway walls should meet the following specifications: Wood-Frame Materials • Exterior siding on breakaway wall panels shall be no thicker than 1/2-inch plywood,APA 32/16 rated sheathing or other equivalent sheathing material. • Breakaway wall studs shall be no larger than 2 inches x 4 inches(nominal dimensions). • Breakaway wall stud spacing shall be 24 inches on center or greater. • Breakaway wall panels attached to concrete slabs shall be constructed with single top and bottom plates.Walls that enclose areas with earth floors may use a double bottom plate. • Interior wall sheathing on breakaway wall panels shall be a maximum of/4-inch plywood or equivalent material. Other Materials • Light-gauge steel framing,such as steel studs,is expected to perform in a manner similar to wood studs and may be used with the conditions for wood framing listed above. • Stucco,Exterior Insulation Finishing System walls,and other lightweight exterior sheathing material may be applied over breakaway walls,provided a separation joint is installed in any sheathing(see Figure 7),insulation,or reinforcing where attached at or near the bottom of the elevated floor beam or joists. • Unreinforced,ungrouted hollow-cell masonry units with a width of 8 inches or less may be attached to floor beams and to concrete or masonry vertical foundation members with standard mortars.Minimum perimeter connections are acceptable as long as the wall is unreinforced. Warning:Unreinforced masonry walls shall not be used in earthquake hazard areas.Consult local building officials for seismic safety requirements. 12 Other Regulatory Requirements In addition to the NFIP regulatory requirements cited in this bulletin,State and local requirements, and the recommendations listed above,other regulatory requirements may apply,such as those listed in the following FEMA Technical Bulletins: • Flood-Resistant Material Requirements,FIA-TB-2 • Elevator Installation,FIA-TB-4 • Free-Of-Obstructions Requirements,FIA-TB-5 • Corrosion Protection for Metal Connectors in Coastal Areas,FIA-TB-6 Flood Insurance Considerations The presence of breakaway walls or other obstructions below an elevated building in the Coastal High Hazard Area(Zones V1-V30,VE,or V)significantly increases the cost of flood insurance. Generally,flood insurance rates increase as the size of the enclosure increases.Flood insurance policies place significant limits on the coverage of any enclosure and/or stored contents below the elevated building.Contact an insurance agent before installing breakaway walls or other obstructions. The NFIP The NFIP was created by Congress in 1968 to provide federally backed flood insurance coverage, because flood coverage was generally unavailable from private insurance companies.The NFIP is also intended to reduce future flood losses by identifying floodprone areas and ensuring that new development in these areas is adequately protected from flood damage.The NFIP is based on an agreement between the Federal government and participating communities that have been identified as floodprone.FEMA,through the Federal Insurance Administration(FIA),makes flood insurance available to the residents of a participating community,provided the community adopts and enforces adequate floodplain management regulations that meet the minimum NFIP requirements.The NFIP encourages communities to adopt floodplain management ordinances that exceed the minimum NFIP criteria.Included in the NFIP requirements,found under Title 44 of the U.S.Code of Federal Regulations,are minimum building design and construction standards for buildings located in Special Flood Hazard Areas.Through their floodplain management ordinances or laws,communities adopt the NFIP performance standards for new,substantially improved,and substantially damaged buildings in floodprone areas identified on FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Technical Bulletins This publication is one of a series of Technical Bulletins that FEMA has produced to provide guidance concerning the building performance standards of the NFIP.These standards are contained in Title 44 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations at Section 60.3.The bulletins are intended for use primarily by State and local officials responsible for interpreting and enforcing NFIP regulations and by members of the development community,such as design professionals and builders.New bulletins,as well as updates of existing bulletins,are issued periodically,as 13 necessary.The bulletins do not create regulations;rather they provide specific guidance for conforming with the minimum requirements of existing NFIP regulations.Users of the Technical Bulletins who need additional guidance concerning NFIP regulatory requirements should contact the Mitigation Division of the appropriate FEMA regional office or the local floodplain administrator.The User's Guide to Technical Bulletins(FIA-TB-0)lists the bulletins issued to date, provides a key word/subject index for the entire series,and lists addresses and telephone numbers for FEMA's 10 regional offices. • Ordering Information Copies of FEMA Technical Bulletins can be obtained from the FEMA regional office that serves your area.In addition,Technical Bulletins and other FEMA publications can be ordered from the FEMA Publications Service Center at 1-800-480-2520.The Technical Bulletins are also available at the FEMA web site at www.fema.gov. Further Information • The following publications contain further information concerning breakaway walls: Federal Emergency Management Agency.2000.Coastal Construction Manual—Principles and Practices ofPlanning,Siting,Designing, Constructing,and Maintaining Residential Buildings in Coastal Areas.(Available spring 2000.) Rogers, Spencer M. 1991."Foundations and Breakaway Walls of Small Coastal Buildings in Hurricane Hugo."Proceedings of Coastal Zone '91.American Society of Civil Engineers.New York, NY. Tung,C.C.;Bohumil Kasal; Spencer M.Rogers,Jr.; S.C.Yeh. 1999.Behavior of Breakaway Wall Subjected to Wave Forces:Analytical and Experimental Studies.North Carolina Sea Grant,North Carolina State University.Raleigh,NC. Glossary Base flood-The flood that has a 1-percent probability of being equaled or exceeded in any given year(also referred to as the 100-year flood). Coastal High Hazard Area— An area of special flood hazard extending from offshore to the inland limit of a primary frontal dune along an open coast,and any other area subject to high- velocity wave action from storms or seismic sources.These areas are identified as V zones. Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)—The independent Federal agency that,in addition to carrying out other activities,administers the NFIP. Federal Insurance Administration(FIA)—The component of FEMA directly responsible for administering the flood insurance aspects of the NFIP. 14 Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)—The insurance and floodplain management map issued by FEMA that identifies,on the basis of detailed or approximate analysis,areas of 100-year flood hazard in a community. Floodprone area—Any land area susceptible to being inundated by flood water from any source. Mitigation Directorate—The component of FEMA directly responsible for administering the flood hazard identification and floodplain management aspects of the NFIP. New construction/structure—For floodplain management purposes,new construction means structures for which the start of construction commences on or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by a community and includes subsequent improvements to the structure.These structures are often referred to as"post-FIRM"structures. Special Flood Hazard Area(SFHA)—Area subject to inundation by the base flood,designated Zone A,A1-30,AE,AH,AO,V,V1-V30, or VE. Substantial damage—At minimum,damage of any origin sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before-damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred.More stringent local requirements may apply. Substantial improvement—At a minimum,any reconstruction,rehabilitation,addition,or other improvement of a structure,the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the"start of construction"of the improvement.This term includes structures that have incurred"substantial damage,"regardless of the actual repair work performed.More stringent local requirements 15 r -,4,1,.72,.,_„--, JON '1 -mo-- p , Oti Z ::! t y'y ._ Na;.,,,,-____/ç; z.r I I I� �n;. n,ryn>-it it!I I� 7; 9a7� r�?X 'R.a4.S'Lhr7 ✓ *74' v V n .IAI.1 i /r71i iG. . I I ^I:? raiz; �i t:m^. ms.P^. i � (Rr.�y> \\� �✓�' C \ 1 f¢vu ,:.yaJ_, .1/ ..J.:l ..,...e7 l.,Lly J ,)..a JJ 4.,tt1 Yi ay .r._.. �/..... yl ,tV ( ' Si 1d'/ rl.•- ;:�� BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES f.----.."5: is r ''� SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK "5,.+, C s: ,rte° PERMIT NO. DATE: August 23, 2006 ',__--- i £ ISSUED TO: ADRIENNE LANDAU ` -k' ` PROPERTY ADDRESS: 855 SOUNDVIEW AVE., MATTITUCK '� '_ `- ex SCTM#94-1-7 = e 1 .,.._ ;;It,,,..4), t'rrpp AUTHORIZATION t =-,, • ri:)",..-\ ',-. ' Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of f Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on ,a t August 23,2006,and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Adrienne Landau, '-- ;; ,... and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution, the Southold Town Board of Trustees '` ' �"rii y: {qqq;�''''' authorizes and permits the following: C: C L 8^ ,'c "` Wetland Permit to renovate,partially restructure, and expand the existing one-story, three-bedroom dwellinginto proposed two-stor four-bedroom dwelling;replace existing mi. "--'' i � ' � P P Y� Grr k, 3 patio; relocate and upgrade sanitary system; and install drainage system of drywells, and all as :, depicted on the site plan prepared by Joseph A.Ingegno last dated July 31,2006. e ,, x _,,,.: i__., .,,.ert, vir: £J N rJ'/ t IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, '+'�� and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. x;`'5,5+',"•,\I� Pi . (:,,,,,- -1-(.-. Y EAC C {/�/l�/+r/� 4;;---11:::, • „ , te AT V '', — I is, A 4 41, , „y , /MI � �1 E , 'iC „........ 4p.t, jor ,,,,b, !� � � `.! \`'!.).117- ,.'". ' "`ice,�-�,� * 7.---„,,,,.... s:;..) i' ,fr- ,to.: tr to 1:C...; --:'s CCF��� V` 6.,um� , . .. ,. ,;` /\ � ,:; .r / \,,fir K_ r • i . ,1,,,,,,,, „, ,,'k • ? ����/gull, .l�t II ��`,....a..S::etnle%a: .! ^, FtIr\,,,,,..-:4;,,y..,:,,11.,-- r.' y,+ t V114. „ r(Ix +Y a Th ,, r. 1--.:Z,'k<;; 'S7 � �y r i t < .tLx�'a.�' x:..�cL �t>,F � - \,..,..,:,.4. -,,�'"`. i�)-t�4II,,�2�4.— 6' �s :Y. —'''''.r;24.:—. :;r i,rt . - .. ;,:,;‘,- x,.,.' w ^x;51? 3,ve , //,�� I..•,.. James F.King,President �rio_``%a SOU.y� Town Hall Jill M.Doherty,Vice-President �0 1. ' 4 53095 Route 25 I ` P.O. Box 1179 Peggy A.Dickerson ; 4 * % Southold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen ; G Q ,i •O ? Telephone(631)765-1892 John Holzapfel -e,f, I n,& ,• Fax(631)765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 23, 2006 Mr. Robert E. Herrmann En-Consultants, Inc. 1319 North Sea Rd. Southampton, NY 11968 RE: ADRIENNE LANDAU . 855 SOUNDVIEW AVE., MATTITUCK SCTM#94-1-7 Dear Mr. Herrmann: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wed., August 23, 2006 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, En-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of ADRIENNE LANDAU applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated August 2, 2006, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 268-5.H, said application was found to be Consistent with Policy 6 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, by the Board of Trustees, and will further the policies by the installation of gutters and drywells to contain the roof run-off, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 23, 2006, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, 2 / WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of ADRIENNE LANDAU to renovate, partially restructure, and expand the existing one-story, three- bedroom dwelling into proposed two-story, four-bedroom dwelling; replace existing pool patio; relocate and upgrade sanitary system; and install drainage system of drywells, and all as depicted on the site plan prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno last dated July 31, 2006. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $50.00 Very truly yours, (114t'el c ..... .. Jame F. King President, Board of Trustees JFK/Ims , \ - Itt !-C tvv 31a4rvc 4 5w ;; OP \�L/ - '� --%oo 0 at0o`r �l c r� k.O�� , -��5 6' i+9� apt`( 41 T 1.0-4-146 Ulik 2 .a_o io 1 0 O•at. '11 13J 1$ 70 y� :.) / -A---- -4- . \ Xtb 13 0 tC. :y • • l �g�- �� O O. �4 / ! y{Or ,gyp / /Finii O, tr Is ft- t fi AJCh Xi• o� 0 iO. � �NV•k' Z l�jn_¢,.. �• d S7, 0. uk _s O i ut 0 N a, G �Q°�'� 0 r( c :-% l"�"' Vs 0 ‘.6‘a 41 6e z6tS 1 (4 -AV-2)16) VV.0495 NOTEN = MONUMENT SURVEY FOR JOHN 8 FRANCES DIVELLO TO: MgTTtTUCK GUARANTEED F SOUTNOLD SECURITY TITLE a GUARANTY CO. TOWN O BANK SOtJTHOLD SAVINGS B SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y JOHN 8 D SA G BANK VELLO SCALE . 1"= SO, ,. SEPT. 4, 1968 LAND SURVEYOR AUG.. i, 1979 N.Y. SURVEYOR YOR APR. 82197o RIVERHEAD, N. Y. •- [44 '4 m4-4 c;,'* ‘ AR.cH'ITECTU R,E<,.. Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 June 05, 2007 Re: Application of Adrienne Landau renovation & addition to existing residence at 855 Soundview Ave. Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Board members, Narofsky Architecture has prepared the following project description and diagram (see attached drawing) to help clarify some of the confusion between what portions of the existing dwelling will remain, what portions will be demolished and what portions are new construction. As illustrated in the diagram, the solid wide lines along with the dashed lines create the perimeter of the existing residence, indicated in red, a one story cape of 1,162 square feet over a partial basement containing mechanical equipment and crawl space. The proposed design modifies the east side of the existing structure by demolishing approximately 477 square feet, represented by the dashed lines, of the existing residence in order to open up the view from the front yard. The existing structure's gable roof is to be removed to allow construction of the main floor level and a new view deck, accessed from the new master bedroom and living room. This viewing deck area is represented by the dotted hatch. The existing walls, represented by the thick solid line, will remain and have new windows and siding installed. Added behind and to the east of the existing structure is a new steel frame addition consisting of guest and mechanical rooms on grade level (no new basement or crawl space is proposed) and living and master bedroom space on the second floor, represented by the thin solid line. All of the new construction is proposed landward of the existing structure and existing top of bluff setback line. • If there are any further questions about this or any other issue, I will be attending the hearing on June 28th to address any questions the Board may have. Thank you Stuar Narofsky, AIA liii,' • WWW.NAROFSKY CON 4 W 22ND STREET NEW YORK,NY 10010 T. 212.675 2374 212.675.2375 t r�— EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED - TOP OF BLUFF APROXIMATELY 411 SQUARE FEET 2, `Ae: � `7u:`yam-C e 1 EXISTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN WI NEW a}}v_'t.`.4 a� ' .:;,'',1 4 WINDOWS 4 SIDING TO BE INSTALLED i{•Y.?lar'�` t.er.2.,..I v`..- yt. � vS u�r�-,r jt,�`'S,°^�1'w''�.�ri ri W` EXISTING TOP CF BLUFF n y, _ ,v SETBACK LINE PERIMETER CF PROPOSED NEW STEEL y''1 - i tkl'14?t1A.":.°M. FRAMED ADDITION CONSISTING OP GUEST 4 -4-4%‘.1-!.-.1-!..,S4' v '''' -r,',tia. �� MECHANICAL ROOMS ON GRADE LEVEL(NO '40,,,js+ r't 2.1.14"'{'{V�^u: NEW BASEMENT OR CRAWL SPACE IS �h >'SYtd.r � „-�' e/ v , 'a !�"aia•� W PROPOSED)4 LIVING AND MASTER 'ci�z �� q ~.4.t�' m y,,� .`+ Asa `.�tr•.',k''• ry,'-L'' BEDROOM SPACE ON THE SECOND FLOOR y`t,+�5 :,;,x,04:rA,V. r'S �` 7��k4)., ,e a:yes,y f �:F: r�`�ya. • / .4, ,�'`;,rrMt��'�is �,'; EXISTING GABLE ROOF TO BE / '"+*^ro�"ff� jyt:�`?., / • ,.s.r'-r:vt.,; 5:::,r,,.y- �. REMOVED TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION r`� +.= ^..'4^-•• I >�,"�i ja'�:,�C n`'^��..w.- },`.•:}�'t / ,▪ -e .',`iii! :• 1.ti?'ec'4"4t�; =Pw $.:0r"'-"../ OP A NEW VIEW DECK / ....4,;,:L-4:1_,A;-:,.14,-,4.i.,"1:.%:.hr,. t.+Y' / / a1°a▪ �4-:••,...44{a.41.fir / �- I �r.., ,m. ........44.4.." "n....." .. -...- �/ NDN C • PROJECT: Fagin Residence JOB NO : 0509 4 West 22nd Street, 5th Floor 855 Soundview Ave SCALE : NTS R1114 New York, New York 10010 Mattituck, NY 11952 DRAWN BY: -- 1:1111) D Iii I T 212.675.2374 F 212.675.2375 ARCHITECTURE Project Description DATE: 06.05.07 • S ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL, LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. 0. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (631) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER(631)369-2065 P. 0. Box 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 CARMELA M. DI TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B.STRUNK THEODORE D. SKLAR June 7, 2007 NANCY SILVERMAN LISA J. Ross MELISSA H. SIDOR Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Re: Application of Adrienne Landau ZBA File No. 6033 Premises: 855 Soundview Avenue Mattituck, New York SCTM No.: 1000-094.00-01.00-007.000 Dear Members of the Board: We received a copy of the May 16, 2007 letter from Thomas J. McMahon of the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District. Mr. McMahon reviewed the site as per the ZBA's request and his only suggestion was that a new sediment and erosion control plan be developed for the project. Specifically,he believed that the proposed placement of the staked hay bales and/or silt retention fence was incorrect. We shared Mr. McMahon's concerns with our surveyor, Joseph A. Ingegno, L.S. Upon consideration of Mr. McMahon's suggestions,Mr. Ingegno has prepared a revised sediment and erosion control plan for the project as shown on the attached survey. As the Board can see from the survey, instead of running a row of hay bales with silt fence generally parallel to the bluff line, the new plan takes advantage of the contours as per Mr. McMahon's suggestion and also continues the row of hay bales and silt fence along the eastern border of the property. We are prepared to implement Mr. Ingegno's revised plan as a condition of any approval from the Board. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. VeryztrAly yours, /bw Enclosures Anth•ny C. Pasca (Pvg • 1110 ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL, LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW r/Jf 6,�/)//try 108 EAST MAIN STREET t l P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (631) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER(631) 369-2065 P. O. Box 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 CARMELA M. DI TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK THEODORE D. SKLAR June 7, 2007 NANCY SILVERMAN LISA J. Ross MELISSA H. SIDOR JUN 8 2007 Town of Southold FONIN0 (;�; -- Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Attention: Linda Kowalski Re: Application of Adrienne Landau ZBA File No. 6033 Premises: 855 Soundview Avenue Mattituck, New York SCTM No.: 1000-094.00-01.00-007.000 Dear Ms. Kowalski: Relative to the above application, please find enclosed the following: 1) Affidavit of Mailings with names, addresses and parcel numbers and Legal Notice attached, as well as certified mail receipts; 2) Eight (8) copies of a letter from me to the Members of the Board with survey attached regarding a new sediment control plan; and 3) Eight (8) copies of a letter from Stuart Narofsky, AIA to Zoning Board Members explaining what portions of the existing dwelling will remain, what portions will be demolished, and what portions are new construction. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, /bw Enclosures Anthony C. Pasca ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL, LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. 0. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (631) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER (631)369-2065 P. 0 Box 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N Y. 11976 CARMELA M. DI TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK THEODORE D. SKLAR NANCY SILVERMAN May 7, 2007 LISA J Ross MELISSA H. SIDOR I f MAY 8 Via Hand Delivery 4633 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Attention: Linda Kowalski Re: Application of Adrienne Landau ZBA File No. 6033 Premises: 855 Soundview Avenue Mattituck,New York SCTM No.: 1000-094.00-01.00-007.000 Dear Ms. Kowalski: In furtherance of our discussions regarding the Landau application, I am enclosing the following documents to support the application: 1) extra set of original submission (to bring total to 8 sets); 2) Narofsky drawing "T-1 b", dated May 3, 2007 (8 sets),which shows the area of ground disturbance, as well as area where machinery will have access to site; and 3) revised LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, dated May 4, 2007 (8 sets), with additional explanations and description used on most recent (1/22/07)plans. I expect to have the engineer's certification regarding the foundation tomorrow, along with the survey, dry well detail, and photos, and I will forward same under separate cover as soon as they are received. Ms. Linda Kowalski Southold Town ZBA May 7, 2007 Page Two Also, with respect to your notation that the map does not match the building inspector's notice of disapproval, I believe the building department noted the wrong map date in its notice of disapproval. The architect confirmed that the January 22, 2007 plans were the plans submitted to the building department and were the plans that were the subject of the April 4, 2007 notice of disapproval. We are trying to get the building department to correct the mistake. As always, if there is anything else you need,please let me know. Very trul . .o s, Antho C. Pasca /bw Enclosures ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL, LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P 0. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (631)369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER (631) 369-2065 P 0. Box 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 CARMELA M. DI TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK THEODORE D. SKLAR NANCY SILVERMAN May 8, 2007 LISA J. ROSS . MELISSA H. SIDOR iL MAY 8 200? ko3a Via Hand Delivery t ...3/3 Town 'ON1NC,; COI t�f1 �a=t.PP:e Nd.,^ Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Attention: Linda Kowalski Re: Application of Adrienne Landau ZBA File No. 6033 Premises: 855 Soundview Avenue Mattituck,New York SCTM No.: 1000-094.00-01.00-007.000 Dear Ms. Kowalski: We are enclosing the following submissions as we have previously discussed: 1) Eight (8) sets (3 pages each) of engineer's foundation plan showing the use and reinforcement of the existing foundation, as well as the details for the new foundation. 2) Eight (8) sets of survey prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno, L.S. showing topography, existing structures, and proposed construction. The survey was updated on April 25, 2007 to show the flags that were set for the ZBA site inspection. The dry well specifications are also shown on the survey. 3) Eight(8) sets of photographs of construction area. Photographs are labeled numbers 1 through 5. Those numbers correspond to the numbers shown on the survey. Ms. Linda Kowalski Southold Town ZBA May 8, 2007 Page Two I believe that completes the items you asked for, but if you require anything else, feel free to contact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very t . your's, Antho C. Pasca /bw Enclosures cc: As. Adrienne Landau Mr. Edward Fagin ),- ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL, LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (631)369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER (631)369-2065 P. 0. Box 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 CARMELA M. Di TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK THEODORE D. SKLAR NANCY SILVERMAN April 17, 2007 LISA J. Ross MELISSA H. SIDOR Via Hand Delivery -----77-777,;m. 4r1 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals APR 182.007 54375 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 oct,, ,,,1 ;,. Attention: Linda Kowalski Re: Application of Adrienne Landau Premises: 855 Soundview Avenue Mattituck,New York SCTM No.: 1000-094.00-01.00-007.000 Dear Ms. Kowalski: We represent Adrienne Landau, owner of the above premises, and we submit on her behalf an original and six (6) copies of the following, together with our client's check No. 2161 in the amount of$600.00 (as the application fee for both a variance and interpretation): 1) Application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals with the following attachments: a) Letter of Authorization; b) Transactional Disclosure Form; c) Project Description; d) Questionnaire; e) LWRP Consistency Assessment Form (same form used in prior Town Trustees application); 0 Addendum to Application; g) Copy of tax map sections with highlighting; h) Aerial photograph from Google Earth. 2) Site Plan and additional drawings prepared Narofsky Architecture & Design; 3) Copies of Determinations Affecting Property: a) Building Department Notice of Disapproval; b) Decision of Town Trustees, together with permit and approved plans; c) Suffolk County Department of Health Services permit,together with approved plans; and d) Prior Decision of Zoning Board of Appeals regarding construction of pool with copy of application. Please note that we will arrange to have the area of the proposed construction flagged as soon as possible, and we will inform you when the property is ready for a site inspection. Other than that, I believe the required materials are included with this submission. If we have overlooked anything, please let me know. Thank you for your attention to this, and feel free to contact me with any questions. Very ,'ours, Antho Pasca c l • I • IW •I rr' 41 • li Illf - ill! I, •••:' , ijo.;1! *:'' M , - - ...,.,,. :. ,..,\-, '.. ___,... .„.. ..... ,_, existing residence north existing residence street entrance - Y U. �•:47.1„.........-...11. ' ✓4 .x4 Zi- ` _�l..,lIIl* FF 4 Ill :; _ _�i- �..I��Ili"j_ r l i I I• -11 iAle 11■ III 1`` , 'A feP iAl ...„: i1/41 ot • . ._ .. _ • ��A1111111 , . ,. IIIIP_ - - a -..�. • r _ `-16. front entrance perspective `- -_ .,-. - -- 'i- __ ie .- •a,...' y of proposed residence _ TT `_IOWT~ -.--Q. !Nil: , . '. , ' ill lei. II1ppIji1IIIp prod@ma rainsaeen al 11111/ 114 ,ate 1 curtain wall �, - ,� 11 oroli i �-i/ zinc cladding Ala— ZONING • INFORMATION aerial view of proposed residence ' „��� RO - - ON 9e BLOCK LOT] -... _.... _._ '--_ _ O .. SEC-ENNiNG DISTRICT RES DENCE WO •-- F AREA _..._.31m80 FT ALLOWABLE LO-COVERAGE 20%OF 31,m. 6,351 SOFT - •.--.'.r' -r ALLOWABLE BUILDING ZONING DATA EXISTING BUILDING ZONING DATA PROPOSED BUILDING ZONING DATA -- MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT EXISTING BUILDING HEIGHT PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT - - 35-0•TO MIDPOINT BETWEEN RIDGE ANDSOFFIT FROM PROPOSED HEMI GRADE 36 FT - - FROM NATURAL GRADE 1I I - MAX.BUILDING AREA EXISTING BUILDING AREA PROPOSED BUILDING AREA I �- NO RESTRICTION AS LONG AS LOT COVERAGE IS MET HOUSE-1,167 SO FT HOUSE-3,100 SO FT PATO 83650 FT PAOL-5I26SO FT \� r': POOL•512 SO FT POOL-512 SO FT J - - DECK-839 S0 FT DECK-93 SO FT -- _ TOTAL-3.35490 FT CAR PORT.43950 FT i. TOTAL-5,380 SO FT41, MAX.HABITABLE FLOOR AREA EXISTING HABITABLE FLOOR AREA PROPOSED HABITABLE FLOOR AREA NO RESTRICTION AS LONG AS LOT COVERAGE IS MET 1ST FLOOR-1,167 SO FT 1ST FLOOR-1,701 SO FT t' .. TOTAL-1,167 SO.FT 2ND FLOOR-1,997 S0 FT LOFT FLOOR•202 SO FT TOTAL-3,903 SO FT MAX.LOT COVERAGE EXISTING LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE 10%OF 31772=6354 SO FT 17%OF 31,772 LOT AREA-5790 SO FT 17%OF 31,272 LOT AREA-5,39090 FT REQUIRED SETBACKS EXISTING SETBACKS PROPOSED SETBACKS SEW-MI 9-0' FRONT.10-2T FRONT-10-90 IW-2 5'(peoposed car port)rm) ,; TIOE�MIN1PE-ONE SIDE AGGREGATE OF 35'-0• AIDE-ETEOF 53:34.'' SIDE-EATE.O.E OF 3-0'2 S(ecetYg) north view perspective AS1 ' TOP OFSLOPE-1ar9 TOP OF BLUFF•159'6° TOP OF BUFF-35.9 of proposed residence TOP OF BLUFF-19E' TOP OF BLUFF-NEW CONSTRUCTION TO BEG9IG AT LEAST 1'-07 BACK FROM TOP OF BLUFF SETBACK LIFE.120'-61 Fagin Landau Residence ► : G• . ARCHITECTURE 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck, NY 11952 45322ndst 1_212 675 2374 ny ny 10010 f_212 675 2375 N--''TDP OF BLUFF LONG ISLAND SOUND .ISTNGTOP OF _ - _�_�-' BLUFF SETBACK LINE • lir EXISTING STRUCTURE fi��=s��� TOP OFBLUFF �i .1---,-.---.-=. • 'N' NEIG • a HBORING STUCTURES ••,.i, - '�\ �`. i1 ,adrt I r H{, . a y 11j t i s iiiiii q , , t . ? 1 I i1 / / I / , 7 EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED- I II AP PROXIMATELY 477 TRUC URETOBEREMOVED- APPROXIMATELY477 SQUARE FEET EXISTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN W/NEW / J� WINDOWS&SIDING TO BE INSTALLED ', / PERIMETEROFPROPOSED NEW STEEL FRAMED '1 /j �' ADDTTON CONSISTING OF GUEST MECHANICAL / i ROOMS ON GRADE LEVEL(NO NEW BASEMENT OR CRAWL SPACE IS PROPOSED)&LIVING AND MASTER BEDROOM SPACE ON THE SECOND FLOOR \ SOURDvoAVER Skvr _ ,-„,,,,:-. EXISTING GABLE ROOF TO BE REMOVED TO ALLOW ;yCONSTTLl1CTI0NOFANEW VIEW DECK Pd- RIQ ".4 Tm5=.110N+ti!.2.09t,.>?F EXISTING RESIDENCE-ONE STORY CAPE OF 1,1E2 2S-Ir KWv SQUARE FEET OVER APARTIALBASEMENT CONTAN- ING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND CRAWL SPACE Project Description Sae Context Plan N7S SOUND 1'.50'41' LONG ISL�.-ND N 67'57'30” E nibums is N 78'09'14" E 75.57 20.84 TIE uNE'Lon 2.63 N 65'37'37" E e APPH�R Htll APPAREHr MN ..GH uN,m mRemy B. M'.� Zsa WATER WAX WATER LARK p°'�P r HOI._�,No woan 'e .tfi .�•• PROPOSED EXPANSION POOL iB d,9 = 1 re E.2 =� r,..—rG ZONE VE(F1-13) ♦•O re. I. ou w Bwr7� �= -� rz N zDNE X ® PROPOSED LEACHING POOL 0 30 �/4 ° 16 J PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK ZONE VE(EI-15) ____-- _______- -+---- _ - to m �_�- 20 to ZONE X I4 _2p (F7 /6 ' �� O PROPOSED 8' DIA X 8' DEEP DRYWELLS FOR ROOF RUN—OFF Z -- 24 20 / /�� _- 28 - en 2 ��- ��_ i =r Baa r+t PROPOSED ARE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION 00 26 .. ..� _r / - �— .p y 28 < �• � _ \o Or. 1)19 M 382 _ \ • ._ „..... _ ______ or—,,eu 3e �j- %/i. ` \�sNOV+ A�ppG$F4O1O �B A q/j + l�j(\�Cldl �e e2 V� o. `�` 46 �/ \ oo \ 1 j 48 / - - „lir 4 FOUND CONC. Bo c •vox ONE. VV52 ,..,' i q..%;:lk 41.,Z 66 SIFP52 VP1Ng1-t 4'''' 56 '+ \ NAY9AIFSMS( �r�lUI •r!tey,� mou W ST F t0 Stn`•'- CORNER t EAR% 62 �` � ' uw„' �_ rom+euhx \Rm."_°N1MlE S'tl \ `[y� STRUCIU 6e 'xX•7�r��'3,` Li�"v __ ��� 62, ��ry,Y1�-ilFyT�Li - . ,. 5, , CREST OF DUFF- %IRA ---...... .. r.--, a .- 'f Is �� Sao �3, �, a G , FRn T.s4.. ,d�. 1 rvc� ' Ill Huv• l��-1 x6'7,1 �' iil•� still l I PROPOSED 2 STORY HOUSE �� ,r 'l (4 BEDROOMS) a� / fl mei MUM �; ��r -.. IFQn-I I. -- ' 1 -.# �Tr' y.A” I U IF 6 f — 'a, 100'-0' TOP OF A'e 1--Ip�P/Y""- �' 4fP--. �Mi�s� .FG-•s1 �BWFF SETBACK O OWNERL '�" O EXISTING CESSPOOL �„� ��� HT 1 - e CO E 0 y� TO REMOVED Ilr --I m m `C cote � 1� IIIBE 1Ir 'd b E t- ti ti 5'MIN. , • /�• © 11., C . ` billI• ma / asTc /` 1 1 I glia a a- ®_____ O Im 1 � RELOCATE POOL It? ` /56 EQUIPMENT lirr_ a,. ,,„ n/• y I ..1, X14 �rj „at., „5(L-,£E 1,7 1 I.-,0L , ��.. . Oa PAHO , �1®1 y \ri�? a0IgI4 ://®x� 404 _ ICE OPTION: �PEu: �L'A m t N ENTRY O? L ' CON ORATION AImure .�; //// 'a 4 l�e'- x WELL LOCATION / ,� H` Y`"'f ° �� �.t . f NREW CARP•T I t6' t[�1�®ti -. 1 m I �Z 4 POSEIltliD NEB' P X 2' DEEP DRYWELL 0 o �_I �_ s : FOR ROOF RUN-iFF s • _ IiBr 'I0 3 I -ffie •-. j�!I!l�Ji- !.,`a�►1 Cl , •'PROPOSF.O-••~AY, -2- 0 06 11'45 t _� O �,�G rah.. ors ao 00 •• >-, - , �°s \•o. )./ ° PRICE OPTION: & ,. ;e NEW GRAVEL DRIVEWAY w Lk ,/s 01 a 4ox t0 I,,°4 :.' - `: Ogz '44' � , \ • p S. • 1 4.. ,...--f de Jr.�,y�� � , ..,joy. 4 MVO i WML i� / -- ;` V e • a 1 L. - ave aa�sZ< 1 • 5 n a WELL _ -�__ —�„�^'' W sa„ •• 'e'". ° Site Plan based on Survey prepared by Joseph Ingegno ,1.51'00" • 1116'=1,-0. ' ENUE AV '' .N-D oVIE Fagin Landau Residence ' •• ,�s • P SO /°\30 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck, NY 11952 ARCHITECTURE 4w 22ndst t_212 675 2374 nyny10010 f 212 675 2375 , . . . , . . , , . top of bluff I setback line . ‘ . ... '---------------- -__------- -_----------.---.--:5___--Z4Nat.,,,. Is —-.......... .....‹.....--.z...--... ....____ * --....i ------5-5Z•i2:----- ---------------- ----75------ -- --1, ---:---,,--.-----------__--- ------z..---------__I----- I:____I ------7.-_-_-----.-:-..-_----------__ - 4" -----:1-_---_------ -lintri pit-i- -:--_:-._ ----------- . ,----„ ; ----- ... -------____--------,---z---_____-____ i._ --- ------______----- ; . • .- - .•- ••- - : IS' I t . . . 1,1------..........::-----......._ Ate. --, : -----------...5.- -----'-:-----_----...___------..„......-_ III 5 . •• - ..' 5 -----„--------.....,------..„ -.„-- •%,,t,-- z--....._ -----..... --,..<:...._......_ ...._ \ 4 . i • , . ' •1- --=-......----______---:--__----___-_-_-:,::--_------..--- ------L--./',.... -----:---_____- _-___-------- • i ' - i - • * -z....._-.--..-----:-.•__----..-..._---....:.._.--.-_------.-..,-._-_____--...:__....-- ---______________ .•---..-,__-.........-_-_ ___----,..:,_--_ , , . • 1_, 1 _s--------,-.-----z---:-.-------2----.1-1--=-----------:..--,- , • ., „ •, , .. , • . . , - , hot tub , 1 -- -_7'.--:----:.--z---_:'•-:-,--_--''z--_--.__, _- :----:,__,--------: ------- ----.___:-------'-'------- ------:---__-----:. \ ' ' ' • ti i *: *, *- . •- , . ' --_____ a .. . • • . ' . C .. . . , 1 "":z.---T--------"----.---------z--z------ -. --.... .. .....z.-:.--- ...----=------2---'-':--- --- -------------- - •----------------:-.•:--- °7 . , • , - , . study./home office• ., 11111111, 1 ell111111W , • . r , , 1 , . . C a • - ' • , • , . II 1 • - . : ' ' : ',: • * • 1 , • , , , . . •. i,w. , . . „ . ; . . •-' „ ,.• -.guestbedrcA 2 , P 1 I. I . N - • , . 11 -11- 1 -111' [1- r iii 1 -- -1 [ - - ] , , , ' , • - S , •- • ---Y---1 . 'Z.' • = in i \ \, 1 I ) I I -:' gu rocm 2.. •: • .- F._. , , . . ...1 - . . . „ , . . end of existing pool . , . ,. . laundry. , to be squared off , ,L. ' '.. room • 1..'','1 , . , t . , II • [ , . • • ' gl---*-- 7- , , ' ; mehiarlicirrootii i . IrL111,/ I , i • -, • ' • - ---- , . . k . . • . . ,: . , • ' . . •., . , - ' . . , , , . • , . , , „ . , • , . . . • Ground Floor , , 1/4*•=1'.0 - . . . - , . . • • . „ . .. . . , „ . , , I Fagin Landau Residence 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck, NY 11952 AP,HtTf(TI1PF 4 w 22nd st t_212 675 2374 . ny ny 10010 f 212 675 2375 It k ,•f I I I I I I top of bluff setback line corner of existing I I structure to remian I I new construction is to 40 begin at least 1'-0° Pz back from top of bluff setback line II 0//111 WI Illial , I I I Gate ix deck O il_ �' / master bedroom - living room — J rl . 1 _I- , i ,, • t • I BII II :1 III I IIIIilIIII i • II . ' i L_-.._J t' 1 it ii ii This ir ri master( •1, - ‘1).__a. oom closet 1 'I , '' - ,. • , i [l 1 I I. riall1111111111111, I R : • • . .., s • , , , , �i i ' kitchen ., • • 'f r1. 1— - • owder' I • 1 >(- entry JI 4 , - . II .l' I a 3I _ i • _ First Floor 1 1/4•=1'4" • I I I 1 l I I 1 Fagin Landau Residence �r `p � . _ 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck, NY 11952 /0.111I LCI UNE 4 w 22nd st L212 675 2374 ny ny 10010 f 212 675 2375 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS o,i�''0� so' - Mailing Address: James Dinizio,Jr., Chairman �i�� 4 74 Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Gerard P. Goehringer * * Southold,NY 11971-0959 Ruth D. Oliva � G Office Location: ` Michael A. Simon .�` ,��4C Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank Leslie Kanes Weisman I'TO \V-1 1i°�� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) ,••' Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631)765-1809•Fax(631) 765-9064 September 10, 2007 By Regular Mail and Fax Transmission 369-2065 Anthony C. Pasca, Esq. Esseks, Hefter&Angel, LLP 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901-2065 Re: ZBA File # 6033 —Variance Decision (Landau and Fagin) Dear,I'r 7.sca: Please find enclosed a copy of the Findings and Determination rendered by the Zoning Board of Appeals regarding the above application. The original was transmitted today for filing with the Town Clerk. Thank you. Very truly yours, nda Kowalski Encl. Copy of Decision to:, Building Department s.z::x `" 3ti „s ?Y�s:l�fF.Gr11I,TECT1I12E'•.... Town of Southold: Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 --74-91)31T677;299,T Re: Application of Adrienne Landau renovation & ad, ditimGto pg(ififIg - residence at 855 Soundview Ave. Mattituck, NY 11952Co 0 33 e.00•Wl�,sO O,,�'°E+//OF APPEALS Dear Board members, n e jo7 P Narofsky Architecture has prepared the following revised project description and diagram (see attached drawing) to help clarify the distances from the top of bluff to the existing & new structure. We have also indicated what portions of the ground floor structure will be built using breakaway construction (see solid black line labeled "H") detailed by the national flood insurance program, what portions will be demolished (see red dashed lines labeled "I")-and what portion is new upper level construction redesigned landward of the top of bluff (see green dashed lines labeled "G"). The setbacks are as follows: Point A is located 40'-0" from the top of bluff. Point A is the location of a - new structural pier supporting the cantilevered upper level. This is the Closest point to the top of bluff for any structure supporting the new upper level. Point B is located 37'-0" +- from the top of bluff. Point B is the location of the existing southwest corner of the lower level foundation (to remain) as well as the corner of the upper level (which is to be cantilevered over the structural pier shown at point A) Point C is located 19'-6" +- from the top of bluff. Point C is the location of the existing northwest corner of the lower level foundation (to remain). Point D is located 33'-7” +- from the top of bluff. Point D is the location of our new lower level corner supported on the existing foundation. Line E is located 54'-0" +- from the top of bluff. Line E is the location of the lower level wood decking Point F is located 56'-8" +- from the top of bluff. Point F is the location of the closest point between the top of bluff and the new lower level slab on grade structure. We have also included, for reference, a 40'-0" top of bluff setback line, in order to show that virtually all of the new structures are located landward of that line. With the exception of a small portion of the corner of the upper level, only the rebuilt portion of the lower level falls within that 40'-0" setback. More importantly, as shown by the red dashed lines (labeled "I"), much of the existing lot coverage within the 40-foot setback is being removed. We have calculated that, presently, there are 749 square feet of the footprint located within the 40-foot setback. Of that 749 square feet, we are proposing to remove permanently 308 square feet (consisting of the deck and part of the first floor), thereby reducing the total footprint within the 40-f000t setback to 441 square feet. That is more than a 40% reduction of the lot coverage within the most sensitive 40-foot setback area. Thank you Stuart Narofsky, AIA • AUG 9 2007 zomitNA E.30. .) OF APPEALS 1 et Liz,-, 40'-0"TOP OF BLUFF AUG 9 2007 `. SETBACK LINE ZONING BORED 0!A?PE4S A B H ------------MEW OEM MID _ ••C=.Z•11•11 l MI-- .+ ---------- -------------------------------- -mos--IMI--OMB---------IMO----III.-- - - L...... .j , G-- / i i , 11 /4',A / / / /',''nIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIN 1 ® / TOP OF BLUFF ■ a 1_1011011°1 /r_____/ y o , 1 E / / // / / /r-il / / / -- ,. _ ,..„.. �i / / / __ / / L , c=.=...,..... „...._,,,,, / ...... D , , _. ___ —J 6, / ■ ■r.. _� n F / r f ` A 1 __, _, . _........... 1_.f ....i.. ,; 1........i Tie jimi77:21. ____, now .� I �_� 777mr7J” 01.41A- ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL,.,LLP 1f'"(' ) / COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET . kJ/a/o P. O. Box 279 NF /! RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W ESSEKS (631)369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER (631) 369-2065 P 0. Box 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N.Y 11976 CARMELA M. DI TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C. PASCA July 19, 2007 NICA B STRUNK THEODORE D. SKLAR s . 4 9:.7NANCY SILVERMAN YY iy tit �� �.Wy LISA J. Ross JUL (n 7 MELISSA H. SIDOR "� -'� `�oo` Hand Delivered zohnici coAn oy- ,c, E3 Pp 11ms Linda Kowalski Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Application of Adrienne Landau ZBA File No. 6033 Premises: 855 Soundview Avenue Mattituck, New York SCTM No.: 1000-094.00-01.00-007.000 Dear Ms. Kowalski: We are submitting seven (7) copies of the following documents for the Zoning Board's consideration: 1) letter dated July 18, 2007 from Stuart Narofsky to the Zoning Board to describe proposed revisions to the project; 2) color coded drawing showing proposed changes to foot print and set backs; 3) revised site plan and floor plans showing proposed changes and; 4) guidelines for"breakaway" construction. As we discussed at the prior hearing with the Board,these revisions are submitted in an attempt to address some of the Board's concerns raised at the hearing. The applicants would accept an approval from the Zoning Board as conditioned on making the changes to the plans as described in Mr.Narofsky's July 18, 2007 letter and his accompanying drawings. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very t yours, Anthor y C. Pasca /bws Enclosures A fi JUL 1 9 2007 116 ARCHITECTURE ..'. JUL 1 9 2007 Town of Southold: Zoning Board of Appeals • 54375 Main Road Southold, NY 11971zo ��� �,,� OF � July18, 2007 PPEALS Re: Application of Adrienne Landau renovation & addition to existing residence at 855 Soundview Ave. Mattituck, NY 11952 Dear Board members, Narofsky Architecture has prepared the following revised project description and diagram (see attached drawing) to help clarify what portions of the structure will be built using breakaway construction detailed by the national flood insurance program, what portions will be demolished and what portions are new construction redesigned landward of the top of bluff. As illustrated in the diagram, the blue lines along with the red lines create the perimeter of the existing residence, 1,162 square feet over a partial basement containing mechanical equipment and crawl space. The proposed design modifies the east side of the existing structure by demolishing approximately 477 square feet, represented by the dashed red lines, of the existing residence in order to open up the view towards the sound, from the front yard. The existing structure's gable roof is to be removed to allow construction of the main floor level and a new view deck, accessed from the new master bedroom and living room. This viewing deck area is represented by the grey hatch. Added behind and to the east of the existing structure is a new steel 'frame addition consisting of guest and mechanical rooms on grade level (no new basement or crawl space is proposed) and living and master bedroom space on the upper floor, represented by the black solid line. In the previous design, as it was reviewed by the board on June 28th, the master bedroom wing was located 28'-4" +- from the top of bluff, as illustrated by the green dashed line. In the revised design, as it will be reviewed by the board on August 2nd, the master bedroom wing has been relocated to 37'-0" +- from the top of bluff, as illustrated by the solid black line. All of the new construction is proposed landward of the existing structure and existing top of bluff setback line. Thank you Stuart Narofsky, AIA \ 1 1 w I th $z _I �--1 t°Ii ( a 11I 1 ti , - ,/,-;::i"'-;-34-::Ii-:ir.;:'''',: ,:-.,,:;'-'11-..,1:1':iCl.'::::' 3-.,:_V„.:,,,::"............... ....... 3_ D.'-'ca: t\t, -0, -7t f✓:4.:,/,•_.-..-. •--;-T..%•�,;,•to _,4<E`.,,,1:0t.">, t 14 U ':•••'::;‘...•'-::,,../z4=', 2-.• il,' 4'{it I'r tr's f/ i':•.4�-: !T` 4=',,",2-.•—=,41.1' `moi..: vt:+. 0 0 .1—_ :`:i _ ;t _ -• J/ .y 1.=:11 .'',r a'J ........•i r 1 O ' w_1 o 0w m >(n >I- 0 Ili w�wWv� A w 4 Ow(t cD w Z 'pct w � aIll ff � ti a .dF atdt�d®v m 1 9 tp . w 4.1),k5 n=Mtn Q O O� p� 0 �00�Qr0 tr wr 1aw9b, 160040 w 0��r w�[d LL�L00, P� wTk1Q 0-�O,�U wo ' � '- °`� 0H -I`°00 oQ_Izp0 U hw,-O wQUwwr w zo - ftwff WQzQoO w zSOI-= Ewan E F0if 3jz'-0 FL4uBoo of Nuuiid _1028c t... OutzO� 0.w. w_fir, , , :ir `, „ Technical All 1 9 2007 ,.A ' r .r � Bulletin ZONING' SCAM OF APPEALS S �. ti• .e� • ,,: 9-99 Design and Construction Guidance for Breakaway Walls Below Elevated Coastal Buildings in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program n . 'Iiii i s, , ky i-.—) . # - jL . , .„ , t, .. ,: ; ____.. . , • ”�.-c;- ..�- .. moi- .. ' 'r uc� y �- , . , . _ , w_"r „, : , , , . . , c .__ ._ ,„,_ ._ .,_ “ .... . .._ , iFk �.1 7,,,,, ! f: FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FIA-TB-9 c,, .�.,_,,i i (9/99) F:z , 4;;411., ;+;p. . ;t MITIGATION DIRECTORATE •Key Word/Subject Index This index allows the user to locate key words and subjects in this Technical Bulletin. The Technical Bulletin User's Guide(printed separately)provides references to,key words and subjects throughout the Technical Bulletins.For definitions of selected terms,refer to the Glossary at the end of this bulletin. Key Word/Subject Index Page Breakaway wall,failure modes 6, 7 Breakaway wall,insurance considerations 13 Breakaway wall,NFIP regulatory requirements 1,3 Breakaway wall,requirement for construction with flood-resistant materials 1, 12 Breakaway wall,specifications for NFIP-compliant construction 3,4 Breaking wave,impact on vertical surface 5 Insect screening,for below-building enclosures 4 Latticework,for below-building enclosures 4 Any comments on the Technical Bulletins should be directed to: Federal Emergency Management Agency Mitigation Directorate Program Policy and Assessment Branch 500 C Street, SW. Washington,DC 20472 Technical Bulletin 9-99 replaces Technical Bulletin 85-3(draft), Breakaway Walls. Wave design on cover based on the Japanese print The Great Wave Off Kanagawa,by Katsushika Hokusai (1760—1849),Asiatic Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. • TECHNICAL BULLETIN 9-99 Design and Construction Guidance for Breakaway Walls Below Elevated Coastal Buildings in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program Introduction In Coastal High Hazard Areas(Zones V,VE, and V1-30),the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)regulations require that communities participating in the program adopt floodplain management ordinances or laws requiring that all new and substantially improved buildings be elevated to or above the base flood elevation(BFE)on foundations consisting of piles,posts,piers, or columns.These open foundations must be designed to allow waves and water moving at high velocity to flow beneath the building.Local ordinances or laws adopted by participating communities must further require that the area below the lowest floor of the elevated building be left free of obstructions.Walls or other obstructions below the elevated building can significantly increase the potential for flood damage to the elevated building by increasing the surface area subject to wave impact and velocity flow during a coastal storm. Although obstructions are prohibited,the area below the lowest floor of an elevated building in a Coastal High Hazard Area may be enclosed with open wood latticework,insect screening,or non- supporting"breakaway"walls(see Figure 1).However,each of these must be designed and constructed to collapse under wind and water loads without causing collapse,displacement,or other structural damage to the elevated portion of the building or supporting foundation system.In addition,like all other construction in the Special Flood Hazard Area,any enclosure below the lowest floor of an elevated building must be built with flood-resistant materials and with methods and practices that minimize flood damage.Furthermore,the area below the lowest floor of the elevated building may be used only for parking,building access,or storage. Specific'design requirements are included in the NFIP regulations for breakaway walls.More recent research on breakaway walls performed for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)and the National Science Foundation by North Carolina State University and Oregon State University evaluated the failure mechanisms(see Further Information on page 14 of this bulletin).The research included full-scale,laboratory wave-tank tests of breakaway wall panels. This bulletin describes prescriptive design details that comply with the requirements of the NFIP regulations and that may be used by design professionals as an alternative to the performance requirements listed in the regulations. 1 } -r_ - u �__ -__- _ _ 1'1', _:Ii' 'I� 1 i�11111 V - Floor Joists 0 0 0 0 f' - :' Floor J . ' f', . Support Beam Breakaway . Breakaway f . Wall I Wall `Z—Vertical Foundation Member Figure 1 Area enclosed by breakaway walls below an elevated building. 2 I ` NFIP Regulations Section 60.3(e)(4)of the NFIP regulations states that the community shall: "Provide that new construction and substantial improvements in Zones V1-V30, VE, and also Zone V if base flood elevation data is available on the community's FIRM,are elevated on pilings and columns so that(i)the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member of the lowest floor(excluding the pilings or columns)is elevated to or above the base flood level;and(ii)the pile or column foundation and structure attached thereto is anchored to resist flotation,collapse and lateral movement due to the effects of wind and water loads acting simultaneously on all building components. Water loading values shall be those associated with the base flood. Wind loading values used shall be those required by applicable State or local building standards. A registered professional engineer or architect shall develop or review the structural design specifications and plans for the construction,and shall certify that the design and methods of construction to be used are in accordance with accepted standards of practice for meeting the provisions of paragraphs(e)(4)(i)and(ii)of this section." Section 60.3(e)(5)further states that a community shall require: "...that all new construction and substantial improvements within Zones V1-V-30, VE, and Von the community's FIRM have the space below the lowest floor either free of obstruction or constructed with non-supporting breakaway walls,open wood lattice- work,or insect screening intended to collapse under wind and water loads without causing collapse,displacement,or other structural damage to the elevated portion of the building or supporting foundation system.For the purpose of this section,a breakaway wall shall have a design safe loading resistance of not less than 10 and no more than 20 pounds per square foot. Use of breakaway walls which exceed a design safe loading resistance of 20 pounds per square foot(either by design or when so required by local or State codes)may be permitted only if a registered professional engineer or architect certifies that the designs proposed meet the following conditions:(i)Breakaway wall collapse shall result from a water load less than that which would occur during the base flood;and(ii) The elevated portion of the building and supporting foundation system shall not be subject to collapse,displacement,or other structural damage due to the effects of wind and water loads acting simultaneously on all building components (structural and non-structural). Water loading values used shall be those associated with the base flood. Wind loading values used shall be those required by applicable State or local building standards.Such enclosed space shall be useable solely for parking of vehicles,building access,or storage." Technical Bulletins provide guidance on the minimum requirements of the NFIP regulations. State or local requirements that exceed those of the NFIP take precedence.Design professionals should contact community officials to determine whether more restrictive State or local regulations apply to the building or site in question.All applicable standards of the State or local building code must also be met for any building in a flood hazard area. 3 , Below-Building Enclosure Options Compliant With the Regulations According to Section 60.3(e)(5)of the NFIP regulations,areas below elevated buildings in Coastal High Hazard Areas(Zones VI-V-30,VE, and V)may be enclosed in one of two ways: (1)with insect screening or open latticework or(2)with breakaway walls. • Insect Screening and Open Latticework Insect screening and open latticework below elevated buildings are not considered obstructions as long as they meet the performance requirements of Section 60.3(e)(5)of the NFIP regulations.To increase the likelihood that the screen or latticework will collapse as intended,without transferring loads to the building or its foundation,this bulletin recommends that the vertical framing members on which the screen or latticework is mounted(such as 2 x 4's)be spaced at least 2 feet apart. Either metal or synthetic insect screening is acceptable.Lattice is available in 4'x 8' sheets in wood or plastic.The material used to fabricate the lattice should be no thicker than V2 inch,and the finished sheet should have an opening ratio of at least 40 percent.(Although Section 60.3(e)(5) specifies wood lattice,plastic lattice is acceptable as long as it meets the requirements listed above.) Breakaway Walls Section 60.3(e)(5)of the NFIP regulations requires that breakaway walls either(1)be constructed to meet prescriptive criteria for resistance to wind and water loads or(2)be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect. Walls Meeting the Prescriptive Criteria According to NFIP performance criteria for breakaway walls,any wall with a designed safe working resistance of not less than 10 and not more than 20 pounds per square foot(psf)is considered a breakaway wall and does not require certification by an engineer or architect. Previous NFIP design guidance,in the 1986 edition of FEMA's Coastal Construction Manual, specified standard stud wall panels placed between pilings or other vertical foundation members, but connected to the building only at the top and bottom of the panel with a specific number of fasteners intended to restrict the capacity of the wall to the 10-to 20-psf range.Higher loads will cause a failure at the top or bottom connections.Breakaway walls built according to this previously developed guidance continue to be compliant with the NFIP performance criteria. Walls Requiring Certification In many coastal areas,local building codes include wind design requirements that exceed the 20- psf maximum described above.NFIP performance criteria allow for construction of breakaway walls that meet these wind requirements.Breakaway walls with capacities higher than 20 psf are permitted if an engineer or architect certifies that(1)the wall will collapse before base flood conditions are reached and(2)the elevated building will not be damaged by combined wind and flood loads on all building components.The remainder of this bulletin presents a prescriptive description of breakaway walls that meet the two certification conditions based on more recent research. 4 Wave Forces and Rising Storm Surge The results of previous breakaway wall analyses,which served as the basis of recommendations in the 1985 edition of FEMA's Coastal Construction Manual,assumed design flood conditions and oscillating(non-breaking)wave conditions.The more recent research conducted by North Carolina State University and Oregon State University assumed two significant differences to better model coastal storms:breaking waves and rising water levels with time.In addition,full-scale wall panels were tested in a wave tank at Oregon State University to confirm the theoretical results. The severity of the flood hazard in V zones and coastal A zones is greater than that in non-coastal A zones,primarily because of the presence of breaking waves,which generally do not occur in non-coastal A zones.As a breaking wave passes a piling foundation or other open foundation,the structure experiences an oscillating,high-velocity flow that peaks at the wave crest,just as the wave breaks.While there are drag forces on the foundation,most of the flow under the building is undisturbed,making open foundations a manageable design.When a breaking wave hits a vertical surface,the effect is quite different.When the crest of a breaking wave impacts a vertical surface,a pocket of air is trapped and compressed by the wave(see Figure 2).As the air pocket collapses,an exceedingly high-pressure burst is placed on the wall,centered around the stillwater level.For example,peak pressures from a 5-foot breaking wave can be 100 times higher than the 10-to 20- psf range specified in the NFIP regulations. Wave Crest / Stillwater Elevation Trapped Aire Vertical Compressed by Wave Surface Ground-1 Figure 2 Impact of breaking wave on vertical surface. 5 The research found that standard wood stud wall construction with structural wood sheathing failed after being hit by several breaking waves averaging 2 feet in height.Those conditions will occur early in the storm when the stillwater depth is approximately 2 feet.Although the forces acting on the wall are high,they can be expected to act close to the ground,where much of the force is transferred into the ground or to the foundation near the ground.Therefore,prior to failure, the forces,transferred to the elevated building by the breakaway wall can be minimized. The full-scale tests conducted as part of the research showed that wood-frame breakaway walls designed to meet high-wind conditions will fail reliably at the connection between the bottom plate of the wall and the floor(see Figure 3a).The tests showed that the failure begins with the bowing and gradual displacement of the bottom plate(see Figure 3b)or a similar secondary failure beginning with the central studs of the breakaway wall.Wood-frame breakaway walls built according to the criteria presented in the following section of this bulletin are expected to fail in this manner.In addition,the tests demonstrated a secondary failure mode that occurs if the bottom plate of the wall fails to break away.In that situation,failure will occur at the connection between the bottom plate of the wall and the bottom of each wall stud,with little increase in capacity(see Figure 4).The conclusion of the research is that wood-frame breakaway walls will fail well before they transfer excessive loads caused by higher wave forces to the elevated building or foundation. V1, Vertical Wave Force IVVVV v Foundation , Member Wave Crest Wave Height Approximately 2' Intenor riginal Stillwater Sheathing Position of ; Elevation Breakaway I � Wall Breakaway - Wall Vertical 111 Breakaway Foundation Wall Bowed Member Inward by Exterior Wave Load Sheathing Concrete Slab \ Bottom Plate GroundZ�F\ �` -- . r Failure of Nails °o•1 Holding Bottom aogo0 '2:6° o Plate to Floor ■ Failure of Connection Between Breakaway Wall Bottom Plate and Floor (a) (b) side view plan view Figure 3 Expected failure mode of wood-frame breakaway wall based on full-scale testing—side view(a)and plan view(b). 6 Wave Force \O/ Y Wave Crest Wave Height Approximately 2' Interior I Sheathing Stillwater Elevation , Breakaway Wall Vertical Foundation I Member Exterior w Sheathing Exterior and Interior Failure of Nails Sheathing Broken at Holding Studs to II'�I Bottom of Breakaway Bottom of Plate `,` Wall Studs Ground +.,` ___---- -_-� I0ri t • //�y// p..o mod o-0 40 :1):7 ,�o_a. ' Concrete o.a ooaM,R 'off �::� Slab Bottom Plate Failure of Connection Between Bottom of Breakaway Wall Studs and Breakaway Wall Bottom Plate Figure 4 Secondary failure mode of wood-frame breakaway wall as determined from full-scale testing. Breakaway walls consisting of unreinforced masonry are expected to fail at the mortar joints between the masonry units,beginning near the stillwater level(see Figure 5),where the pressure on the wall is greatest. 7 .°. • ° ,'o D0° a Vertical�J'o' p, v Foundation Member IS - '- 0. o o a 40 Wave Crest � ' Hollow Concrete rJ, = �. A Io.) ay Masonry Units i 4.00=' 0� Are Ungrouted 0 / / . '�40 a Wave ° • a 4. // Height / p° °l,.. o __- Approximately Approximately 2) o p 4 `° I oa o ° �o Breakaway Wall Constructed of Stillwater ° 0°n"•" Qa Unreinforced, Hollow Concrete o 0 o; . ' Masonry Units- Elevation ° ' - (Units Not to Exceed 8" o ifn Thickness) p• �,. ° a oa .Q i 0 Q b •o d0 Q Ground Qa Qa nrConcreteSlab o• a'D ///,'v'//i 0 4 0 0 %:°��a o Figure 5 Expected failure mode of unreinforced masonry breakaway wall. Prescriptive Breakaway Wall Criteria Design and Construction A professional designer may specify a breakaway wall with a capacity outside the 10-to 20-psf range using the following specifications. 1. The building must be elevated on a piling or other open foundation designed to withstand wind and water loads acting simultaneously and any other loads prescribed by applicable State or local building codes or other applicable laws,ordinances,or regulations. 2. Breakaway walls shall be designed to meet or exceed all applicable building code requirements for wind,earthquake,and other criteria. 8 3. The floors of areas enclosed with breakaway walls are assumed to be soil or unreinforced concrete slabs less than 4 inches thick.An unreinforced concrete slab has no wire mesh or steel rods.Floor slabs shall not be structurally attached to the pilings or other vertical foundation members. 4. Breakaway wall panels maybe attached to the pilings or other vertical foundation members,elevated floor support beams,or slab floor with nails or other comparable- capacity fasteners(see Figure 6).All four sides of the wall panel may be attached to the foundation and elevated building.High-capacity connectors such as bolts,lag screws,metal straps,or hurricane fasteners(e.g.,clips or straps)shall not be used. 5. The exterior sheathing on breakaway wall panels placed between pilings or other vertical foundation members may overlap and be attached to the vertical foundation members. 6. Breakaway walls may be constructed as continuous,non-bearing walls,attached to the floor and elevated floor joists,with or without attachment to the pilings or other vertical foundation members. 7. Breakaway wall sheathing and siding may overlap and attach to elevated floor beams and joists provided a separation joint is present to prevent damage to the sheathing or siding of the elevated building if the breakaway wall collapses(see Figure 7).As shown in Figure 7, separation joints shall be fitted with a watertight seal that prevents wind-driven rain water and sea spray from entering the building envelope. • 8. Utilities,including electrical wiring,breaker boxes,power meters,plumbing,conduits,and ventilation ducts,shall not be placed in or on a breakaway wall panel.Building supply lines and other utility line components,such as light switches or electrical outlets,may be attached to pilings or other vertical foundation members as allowed by applicable building codes and floodplain management ordinances and laws(which generally require that utilities be elevated above the BFE).If utility lines must be routed into or out of an area enclosed by breakaway walls,one or more of the walls shall be constructed with a utility blockout(see Figure 6).Utility lines that pass through the blockout will be independent of the walls and therefore will not be damaged if the wall panel breaks away under flood or wind loads. 9. Breakaway wall panels shall be positioned such that on failure,they do not collapse against cross-bracing or threaten other foundation components. 10. Standard residential garage doors may be considered breakaway panels.Although these doors were not tested,published loading capacities for garage doors are comparable to the ultimate capacity for the tested breakaway walls(55 psf). 11. Because enclosures below buildings in V zones must be constructed with breakaway walls that meet the performance requirements of the NFIP regulations,flood vents or openings are not required for such enclosures.Note:Numerous State and local governments require openings in breakaway walls.See your local building official or floodplain administrator for further information. 9 Floor Support Beam -40.- . ------ 4" ,,,,, ..,_,. .. iiii......____________ 4"Wide Utility —N _ Blockout(Created With Extra Studs, I-- Breakaway as Shown,or With Wall 6"Blocks) Top Plate .— Vertical Foundation ' Member —' ---I Gap Between I ,_ Sheathing Wall and Vertical Foundation Member (Optional) --I Breakaway Stud (Not to Exceed 2"x4") 24"or Oi Wider \ t___ --i Breakaway Wall �-- Bottom Plate --I 41110 A .1 � .T1- QQa'Q�Q.064•: - o00d4"apA O D:' 16 ..t' pOd -Do"L-oTT1-0, Q' p APA• o6/•:p ' . //\ // 5 -Expected Point of Failure(see Figure 3). Connections made with nails or comparable-capacity fasteners only. Concrete Slab Grade Beam or Do not use high-capacity fasteners Not Connected to Unreinforced (e.g., bolts, lag screws,hurricane straps). Vertical Foundation Concrete Slab Member Secondary Point of Failure(see Figure 4). Connections made with nails or comparable-capacity fasteners only. Do not use high-capacity fasteners (e.g., bolts, lag screws,hurricane straps). Figure 6 Typical wood-frame breakaway wall construction. 10 B House Walls andSeparation Joint Breakaway Walls,-�y � (See Cutaway Detail) - D Covered with �. Stucco 4Enclosed Area Lath for A " House Wall House Sheathing Stucco �'����������` Watertight Separation• Lath II. Joint at Bottom of �—Sheathing Lowest Horizontal Structural Member in Accordance with tucco-Covered Local CodesHouse WallBeam Non-BreakawayConstruction �� Separation a., _ Joint ' ���CBreakaway 111011 .11, onstruction Stucco-Covered WalStucco,Lath, iOj!' Breakaway /� �I and Sheathingr Wall � � �/ DiscontinuousFraming Breakaway Wall ��� ��� at Separation Members Framing �������� ���� Joint Members �44� ��** •f• ° Vertical ��������►��� Foundation Vertical Member Foundation Member ; 11I Breakaway Wall A ' Sheathing Section AA Flood-Resistant- Lath for Breakaway Wall Figure 7 Separation joint between sheathing and wall covering(e.g.,stucco,siding)on house walls and breakaway walls. 11 Construction Materials As explained in FEMA Technical Bulletin 2-93,Flood-Resistant Materials Requirements for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas,construction materials used bselow the BFE must be resistant to flood damage."Flood-resistant"construction materials are those capable of withstanding direct and prolonged contact(i.e.,at least 72 hours)with floodwaters without suffering significant damage(i.e.,damage requiring more than cleanup or low-cost cosmetic repair, such as painting).The requirement for flood-resistant construction materials applies to breakaway walls. In addition,except where heavier materials are required by the local building code,construction materials used for breakaway walls should meet the following specifications: Wood-Frame Materials • Exterior siding on breakaway wall panels shall be no thicker than Y2-inch plywood,APA 32/16 rated sheathing or other equivalent sheathing material. • Breakaway wall studs shall be no larger than 2 inches x 4 inches(nominal dimensions). • Breakaway wall stud spacing shall be 24 inches on center or greater. • Breakaway wall panels attached to concrete slabs shall be constructed with single top and bottom plates.Walls that enclose areas with earth floors may use a double bottom plate. • Interior wall sheathing on breakaway wall panels shall be a maximum of/4-inch plywood or equivalent material. Other Materials • Light-gauge steel framing,such as steel studs,is expected to perform in a manner similar to wood studs and may be used with the conditions for wood framing listed above. • Stucco,Exterior Insulation Finishing System walls,and other lightweight exterior sheathing material may be applied over breakaway walls,provided a separation joint is installed in any sheathing(see Figure 7),insulation,or reinforcing where attached at or near the bottom of the elevated floor beam or joists. • Unreinforced,ungrouted hollow-cell masonry units with a width of 8 inches or less may be attached to floor beams and to concrete or masonry vertical foundation members with standard mortars.Minimum perimeter connections are acceptable as long as the wall is unreinforced. Warning:Unreinforced masonry walls shall not be used in earthquake hazard areas. Consult local building officials for seismic safety requirements. 12 Other Regulatory Requirements In addition to the NFIP regulatory requirements cited in this bulletin,State and local requirements, 'and the recommendations listed above,other regulatory requirements may apply,such as those listed in the following FEMA Technical Bulletins: • Flood-Resistant Material Requirements,FIA-TB-2 • Elevator Installation,FIA-TB-4 • Free-Of-Obstructions Requirements,FIA-TB-5 • Corrosion Protection for Metal Connectors in Coastal Areas,FIA-TB-6 Flood Insurance Considerations The presence of breakaway walls or other obstructions below an elevated building in the Coastal High Hazard Area(Zones V1-V30,VE,or V)significantly increases the cost of flood insurance. Generally,flood insurance rates increase as the size of the enclosure increases.Flood insurance policies place significant limits on the coverage of any enclosure and/or stored contents below the elevated building.Contact an insurance agent before installing breakaway walls or other obstructions. The NFIP The NFIP was created by Congress in 1968 to provide federally backed flood insurance coverage, because flood coverage was generally unavailable from private insurance companies.The NFIP is also intended to reduce future flood losses by identifying floodprone areas and ensuring that new development in these areas is adequately protected from flood damage.The NFIP is based on an agreement between the Federal government and participating communities that have been identified as floodprone.FEMA,through the Federal Insurance Administration(FIA),makes flood insurance available to the residents of a participating community,provided the community adopts and enforces adequate floodplain management regulations that meet the minimum NFIP requirements.The NFIP encourages communities to adopt floodplain management ordinances that exceed the minimum NFIP criteria.Included in the NFIP requirements,found under Title 44 of the U.S.Code of Federal Regulations,are minimum building design and construction standards for buildings located in Special Flood Hazard Areas.Through their floodplain management ordinances or laws,communities adopt the NFIP performance standards for new,substantially improved,and substantially damaged buildings in floodprone areas identified on FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Technical Bulletins This publication is one of a series of Technical Bulletins that FEMA has produced to provide guidance concerning the building performance standards of the NFIP.These standards are contained in Title 44 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations at.Section 60.3.The bulletins are intended for use primarily by State and local officials responsible for interpreting and enforcing NFIP regulations and by members of the development community,such as design professionals and builders.New bulletins,as well as updates of existing bulletins,are issued periodically,as 13 necessary.The bulletins do not create regulations;rather they provide specific guidance for conforming with the minimum requirements of existing NFIP regulations.Users of the Technical Bulletins who need additional guidance concerning NFIP regulatory requirements should contact the Mitigation Division of the appropriate FEMA regional office or the local floodplain administrator.The User's Guide to Technical Bulletins(FIA-TB-0)lists the bulletins issued to date, provides a key word/subject index for the entire series,and lists addresses and telephone numbers for FEMA's 10 regional offices. Ordering Information Copies of FEMA Technical Bulletins can be obtained from the FEMA regional office that serves your area.In addition,Technical Bulletins and other FEMA publications can be ordered from the FEMA Publications Service Center at 1-800-480-2520.The Technical Bulletins are also available at the FEMA web site at www.fema.gov. Further Information The following publications contain further information concerning breakaway walls: Federal Emergency Management Agency.2000. Coastal Construction Manual—Principles and Practices of Planning,Siting,Designing, Constructing, and Maintaining Residential Buildings in Coastal Areas. (Available spring 2000.) Rogers,Spencer M. 1991. "Foundations and Breakaway Walls of Small Coastal Buildings in Hurricane Hugo."Proceedings of Coastal Zone '91.American Society of Civil Engineers.New York, NY. Tung,C.C.;Bohumil Kasal; Spencer M.Rogers,Jr.; S.C.Yeh. 1999.Behavior of Breakaway Wall Subjected to Wave Forces:Analytical and Experimental Studies.North Carolina Sea Grant,North Carolina State University.Raleigh,NC. Glossary • Base flood—The flood that has a 1-percent probability of being equaled or exceeded in any given year(also referred to as the 100-year flood). Coastal High Hazard Area— An area of special flood hazard extending from offshore to the inland limit of a primary frontal dune along an open coast,and any other area subject to high- velocity wave action from storms or seismic sources.These areas are identified as V zones. Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)—The independent Federal agency that,in addition to carrying out other activities,administers the NFIP. Federal Insurance Administration(FIA)—The component of FEMA directly responsible for administering the flood insurance aspects of the NFIP. 14 a Flood Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)—The insurance and floodplain management map issued by FEMA that identifies,on the basis of detailed or approximate analysis,areas of 100-year flood hazard in a community. Floodprone area—Any land area susceptible to being inundated by flood water from any source. Mitigation Directorate—The component of FEMA directly responsible for administering the flood hazard identification and floodplain management aspects of the NFIP. New construction/structure—For floodplain management purposes,new construction means structures for which the start of construction commences on or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by a community and includes subsequent improvements to the structure.These structures are often referred to as"post-FIRM"structures. Special Flood Hazard Area(SFHA)—Area subject to inundation by the base flood,designated Zone A,Al-30,AE,AH,AO,V,V1-V30, or VE. Substantial damage—At minimum,damage of any origin sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before-damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred.More stringent local requirements may apply. Substantial improvement—At a minimum,any reconstruction,rehabilitation,addition,or other improvement of a structure,the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the"start of construction"of the improvement.This term includes structures that have incurred"substantial damage,"regardless of the actual repair work performed.More stringent local requirements 15 , 4 k, P's. ca ` Nv rrr t, "fir( `,�51>T � dG j1 9♦:` (N.-, � wit(! r 1"V♦ f I „ 44 P ,a= Jt(,'iy 2 1 ` ( �/r VN;1 QA,Al ) C<r. a ,d�rrrx' J L . Co1Q1 ;) �([p, -,e't -:044;:. :4---'-,rr '�, , �,1 +jS , I f�( lP;,�t'+'rt�CY�,>4+ng7� i � (((((f%�`Yi'F"➢`Y,1+1Y5Si�i��.�::v�. ((lrY 't7d7„ ,P1R'ft77P�i+'4RL7s =I�� �4,11-22 TpN3GeFN9� i~ :s,: � P / t(.`' r .1,1�. 'i9 Y!t1.e. M_M1'r�. .Y,v ryv e+fl go, 5:±7sy rm,i�.Y,y;r.....^s.-N.'rrfi,+.4M171'l,nrsm'.^r/^1,�.,ryN%:r en.; --...: v°A ,.+7s TO 1i'0.or �.,..�YRf v 7'8I'IYYA;,,�:'9..G+N !N'Y:/:4-.DTYFS'!,' M.YkS'V... IS---.77--....:�.,, 4 ' «',, '`" "� x'' �►' f� BOARD OF SOUTHOL,I) TO TRUSTEES ,• J,?J.i 1 S®UTH®UI?, NEW YO ^ ; PERMIT NO. 6424 g. DATE: August 23, 2006 ;L. ; yie 4 41 ISSUED TO: ADRIENNE LANDAU eeeFF 1 �h, 4 .444 v ;�t• PROPERTY ADDRESS: 855 SOUNDVIEW AVE., MATTITUCK 'PUi✓K , f SCTM#94-1-7 ,! ii i / r,„ AUTHORIZATION 14;`_1,.' Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of s �F , .1 Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held on 1 August 23, 2006, and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Adrienne Landau, , .Ai � and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees /;4‘., authorizes and permits the following: �s ,3��' ^','It- !ill t 4„.1,w.. Wetland Permit to renovate, partially restructure, and expand the existing one-story, z�° .),„,_ , three-bedroom dwelling into proposed two-story,four-bedroom dwelling; replace existing pool .rg ;' Y patio; relocate and upgrade sanitary system; and install drainage system of drywells, and all as k X, r :.FA ' •rid�`- depicted on the site plan prepared by Joseph A.Ingegno last dated July 31, 2006. ' I ' .1 �J � :7„,H7r):' I.i `l. ..:1/ ; D , 'tip. , ,,ii �, '1 r $ , f,I ,.--4,-,,, , ! +�, � INWITNESS WHERi..::::,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, i.,,',,ti,,A,i„...',0,,,r5� �l and these presents to be subscrby a majority of the said Board as of this date. 1 .,, d � �,i, I', r'"ii a:=,_t!/(�': )- ;, �% P •r ( 4FD .s..v — • Z // ` yam, I r ..: j'w r s .�, ; ; t �' !�• ,.- I�Fy"br�, , .. cp -r::.1',.3 ::-;;;;;;::$ :; : ,1,1,' ; ' 11 . risy '*„ ( J , ' �'J � ! 1 r`4tV, rO i / o `alt l la��y 1 i ,, S I, , d r$. I ..�'x6'Y,, 1,f+.Y Py1c(o ft.4u�t� t.�t dLw.lil�+iJ �3 1..rrl�r.ruaunu ,!!aE}1� n5N�.7 uulr UN.�A fP ,A,,„.,-,4, c .t � -. r,v � Im r�Y �fui r,d. -, +ITJr Gvs.r'�P USWdd1 Jl�rJJ7WOG�AFJJJ�P”YSaIG .wJ�atXr,tir ul A7dn d . 1 ,,,,.,,,,,•,,,,,,,„:„,,,„,,r,! ?�'?-J//� r l �r le'�'u „,,,,,,-,4„,„.„,� ' � S�µ�l .,�. vet r ,u� rl,{ I�. , 7 1u („Y ,, t �/ , p,'r 1 k t �� v ^�h�, I•r 'S, i C' � /^ • !I 1,�r��iV "'t 1'./,.lr5�. . el r,,,��I�' �.t�.��1�I'�� �('��i Ur', 1�'l .X, �!�,. ��{ / ' ��fh �,S•� ��•i�i�'��� "'�,'.+,,rym�A ?]ry��.�� "i41, �” r ^! ,,,, , ,,• v, :„y,,X14`/ k,„:,Jl/l”. �:1y ulltS.e 4i/ .67;-;2• 1),,, I1,,4, tY ,,,,,m ),,; ,w•r s ,,l' I i! J .c/1, }• //,?\' �' ✓r 1W' �.;�`A'/...:`t\k(f/-r.. Jr ;:1'' ' „' ,,,,1.i+ :l?U1.o ,, St4,r,za,N'11J1LJ.. - IU'a+.44lWJklltfAtllUlAJl1, . lI 1 ,s+A St4W,AVN.,,u,,e) -,1_,' wm., „�)))), r ( !,sr },S ', • (;e p, 1 -d' ,Yd1i�5fSxS� �!r},�'+LS,'NAIll1Lr 1 �I(^vAiG rs ))»iY;Ar . t�� ) ? (lo li 'tl( x,01 t /) AI*V ' j 4 01 lJ" V v� ,! )r. I G Yi,), 1. ' ill' 1p irl l ' , , _ 1 It. ,, ��_'� l w.1' ,i� l ,it J , �� .. fitly" lJ �� , , s ...1 NQS 6 ,y� ' td X Jri(t' 1 4, 4� , I'r# tiara .: T is .,t 'z^f'" "C.. a '�„ , <� '.x`;� .-- z�e% -�: II No. ( 44 4 4 4 z v, fl y ., it -'':; — , • a thk 'wi...,e _.,,A i,.? ''+�. _-_ 'xx. r _, z �_..d'.:n.^•z.. p,_'r,•_ ^ ;a.;, N. , • . . i .x ,„ • I f ,,. . ,,, 1 SC Sbu,NA3t i: ... _ . ® a V 'f THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYEDDURING T CTI ® TOWNTRUSTEESI J T L , SOUTHOLD, N.Y. V1971 TEL: 765-1892 765-1892 SURVEY OF PROPERTY , SITUATED AT MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK 1 _ S.C. TAX- No. 1000-94-01 -07 APPROVED BY SCALE 1"=20' BOARD OF TRUSTEES ' __% NOVEMBER 18, 2005 •TOWN OF-SOUTHOLD _ L FEBRUARY 2, 2006 ADDED PROPOSED HOUSE DATE ' 60.3l06 JULY 31, 2006 REVISED PROPOSED HOUSE ‘..)eli-10042 erZ.. eZ‘," AREA = 31,772.62 sq. ft. DENE 0.729 ac. . CERTIFIED TO: . EDWARD FAGIN ANDRIENNE LANDAU -. EXISTING LOT COVERAGE CR1, I AREA % LOT COVERAGE ' I 1,167 sq. ft. 3.67% 836 sq. ft. 2.63% - NOTES: 512 sq. ft. 1.61% 1. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:= 839 sq. ft. 2.64% EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: — — — —so— — — _ - FIRST FLOOR • FLOOR 3,354 sq. ft. 10.55% — oe of auucn ' — TOP OF OFI UIJOJ " _ — ROTi01l OF BULKHEAD rO Q .1% L0 • •'• \IA ZC 6` Ia 0,50".v r. \ 4 D \ LA 1N \ Q —.\ g �L ( :At it ,s, : P°'s.k\r\\\ \\\\\\\\\ \\\\\ \ \\\\\ 7 N Ltx.001,,,..; t.7 �� o \ \\ \\'\\\\ \\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\ • el .. \\ \ \\.\-,\\ \\\ \\\\\\\\\ \\ \ ��sAg�, `'`� \\\\NN N"\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\`,\ t 3t'` �\ - \\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\\ \\\ \ , ..,...\.0 3 .,�+ik, �_)•- \\\\\� \\\\\ \\\\\\\\�\\\\\\ �Q s Y �°•r —*'i'" i (�• \\\\\ \\\\\\\\\.\\\ \\\\\\\ y" -� -- _i O . \ \\\\\\ \\\\ \\\ \\\\ %, �, cs y t •. \:77:::,::' -4 i n..A i- III ;•edea , 9:. : c1 .� \ ..tt wl,1,•..co\ �i�����\\ d . 1 t \� �\ ,1,v\`\ 'i, 1 �'S1p \t\ 1��1 I11I i 1\\\ 1\I\ \\\\ \\ s �M I 11 \ ��il I, V•11\64 _ I I I I I I I I I II 11\ \\\\`- \ _� •�� %_ , I l31-' i11 I II I � I I 1 i 1 \t. I r L' S Al,V ill . - , i. / /I 4'q 4, No O `r'L,,V ,. t r. ` u o T- 23 Z v MS J v. NyIm ryO9Om ` S 56 1-ti11. 61A Y.3j. ts VI, TVA pAoStj%K S O,......s.‘a oJP 0 Gy� y A yc O� • ... . "• _ . .... _ 'OTAL •. ' ' • 5,390 sq. ft. I 16.96% ' 1 VA PRQPOSED SEPTIC TANK . _ ' 5. THE LOCATION OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND/OR-DATA OBTAINED FROM OTHERS. 6. EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM STRUCTURES SHALL BE PUMPED CLEAN AND EITHER BE REMOVED OR • FILLED WITH CLEAN SAND, IN ACCORDANCE WITH S.C.D.H.S. STANDARDS: 7. PROPOSED 8' DIAMETER X 8' DEEP DRYWELLS FOR ROOF RUN—OFF: . , ' • - : - .------------------- TEST HOLE DATA (TEST HOLE DUG BY McDONALD GEOSCIENCE ON OCTOBER 27. 2005) - pREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WOK MUM STANDARDS FOR TITLE suRvEts AS ABASHED a' BY THE LLu...S.AND APPROVED . AtiopTED /// WS MOWN 10/41 OL FOR SUCH USE Of THE NEW Yo• STATE LAND TIRE MORMON. / Rom sum cue CL . 1ga NE ),---) - ''''''..t:';.: .•'-''' . * i I'',.li,'•;•,'''I' It . - , 1 •,.,:.;-..•'..1.: .'' : •,‘' !';'•• ."4-. HN Lb. o. . 1, .......-- 110.00101071FRIE 70 COME SAND SW ......r•r:;:'• ;::;::,...-.•4: UNAMHORIZED ALTERAlloll OR AMU= To'MIS SURvEY IS.A VIDLATION FM ' ...r:`::.'•••.,', SECTION 7209 OF THE NEVI YORK STATE . ' EDUCATION LAW. r eg Joseph A Ing • ••••-,.:3--;,-, ,... : .1 .,,,, ,, ..,.L, s4:-.4."-;':•:...", COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING ME LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR I Land Surveor • ,...,......„., EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL NUT BE CONSIDERED - - • I .• -.•.-„ --, y.-".•",.., • I _ ,:•_:II.- "..• "I TO BE A VAUD TRUE COPY. _, , -,,,,, 1 ' - IT GERD-1000Es INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN - ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR MOH THE SURVEY IS pREPARED,AND ON HIS BEHALF TO THE Elio Surveys-Subdivisions :7 SWPICHIS':-.Cfill9ky!fie IME COLRAIN.syNERIGAENTAL ''AGENCY AND , I ' '''' ,'S--:''.-`:''1-'"•-,'r- LENDING INSTITUTION AN USM3 HEREON. D TO THE ASSIGNEES oF ME LENDING Ran- PHONE (631)727-20?0 - ,- Fa (61)727i_1 lunott CEIRFICATLoNs AILE NOT TRANSFERABLE. _ OFFICES LOCATEDIAT , : IgAILINO,ADDRE THE EXISTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS 322 ROANOKE AVENUE P.O.Box ii93 . . AILD/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD.IF RIVERHEAD.,New'York I-11901 lEverhead Nevelorkil ANY,NOT SHOWN ARE NCR GUARANTEED. _ I . , I , I f L 1 ? . -;,,..,-.,i W 1 "*, Southold Town Board of Appeals A 3. .:, x„,)„.,,,,.„„,_:,.., . •-:.-;_ ' '� At. ���,.' MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.L, N.Y. 11971 " TELEPHONE.(516)765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3691 Application Dated November•6, 1987 TO: .Mr. Hosny Selim [Appellant(s)] 671 Vandam Street , North Woodmere-,- N•Y 11581 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on January 14, 1988, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception,under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [X] Request for VarianceSto the.Zoning Ordinance ' , Article XI., Section 100-119.2 and Article., III, Section 100-31 [ ] 'Request for Application of HOSNY SELIM for a Variance -to. the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article III, Section 100-32 and Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to locate inground swimmingpool with decks and- fence enclosure landward of existing dwelling in the front yard and within 100 feet of the Long Island Sound, at premises known as 855 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map. District 1000, Section 94, Block 01 , Lot 07. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on Decem- ber 10, 1987 in the Matter of the Application of HOSNY SELIM under Appl . No. 3681 ; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and ' WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1 . The premises in question is a described parcel of land containing a total area of approximately 40,000 sq. ft. with 100.55 ft. frontage along the north side of Sound View Avenue at Mattituck, and more particularly known and identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 94, Block 1 , , Lot 7. 2. The subject premises is located in the "A-40" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District and is improved with a single- family dwelling with setbacks as shown by the 0dtober 1 , 1983 survey map prepared by Donack Associates (at 55 feet from the existing bulkhead at its closest point). (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: January 14, 1988. CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) - as;leW ay; uL aansoLoua a3ua} pue soap ya.LM food punoa6u1. ,Ob 'cq ,oz 2 4o U0 flagsuo0. aye iNy21g op. 603A1OS321 aay4an4 SPM 1.L pue `aansoLoua• a0.uas pue s)pep 4;0 Lood punoa6uL aye. so pa;senbaa se uo[120o1 ayp. AN30 `03A10S311 sem 11.1D1.MPS 'aJ fiq pepuooes `a•e6uLayaog •aW Rq uopow uo `SLbuLpa003V Mo Laq pa;ou se `eaae pae/f;uor4 aye. u L 4uope0oL •PALl.euaa.L2 uu 6uLa.uPa6 fig pe jes eq LLLM e3psnp so sq.5aaaquL aye `sa01.0PJ. anwe ay; e so MaLA 111. (4) °MoLaq• palu?ea6 �CLaALa.euaa;Le se `•dal. Laa aye. 2uea:1PM of -Lddns aae ,pawLPLO sapL1°1.4J1.p Le0t;.0ead ay; (a) °aoueLaeA e uey; aet o ensand sq.ueLLadde and aLgIsea.1 poya.aw aaya.o ou sL aaa!y; (p) !sPeJP punoS •I'1 ao ddnlq ay; of Lep.uaw -La;ap eq fou pLnoM pue [s]6u.pLLnq 6U! .S Xa so paeMpueL SL pasodoad se' uo0.011.ASUo0 ay; (0) !enbLun aae seDuelswn3- P aq. (q) :eaae aye do aaq0eaey0 ay; u L a6ueuo Le puea.sgns P aa.eaaa 10u LLLM pue aLgeuosuaaun ;ou SL (2) :6u1.LLaMp 6upsLxa ay; off. U0!41,ppe ue se ao pan;0nags 1faossaooe ue se aay;La ` Lood punoa6u1. ay; do ;uaweoeLd aya. ;eye. seuLwaaa.ep pue spuL3. 09'12 paeog ay; `teadd0 •sLq 6uLaapl.suoo ur -8 •;oL SLaals2e 6uiuLoppe aye. o;uo 6ucdoLs A'eMa6euLeap 2 0114 saaMbL uaya. pue sasLa ,CLa.ue6 pup'. aye. `uoLssaadap aq do apLs ;spa ay; 6uoL% •4.01, ay; 4o (eaaE MOL) uoLssaadap a uL sL uo[1.0naf.suo0 Lood pasodoad aya. do 20.12 aye. (q) :punoS pueLsl 6uol aye. &mit, )1aew aa;PMy6 Ly ay} woa4 4094 -+gg pue 44n Lq so dog. ay; woa4 4aad +LZ loeq as sL uol.lonaq.suo0 8U!. S xe ay; (e) :SMo L Lod se pU 4 SU0!40adsu L aa.Ls-up 'L • •aWL1 sL L86L ` LZ yoaeW penssL Z£8L91 .aN . Eddy aapun 1.0waad 6uLpLLng a 1.ey; paa.ou OSLO SL �L paopaa ay; a°d •g ••(0i-y uwnL00) ;aad as uey; ssaL ;nu sL A0o11.es paeiVgUoas 'aya. ;2y; papLAo,ad eaae gunfil.uoas ayq uL 6uLLLaIp LedL.Outad 2 o; sa.uetuy0214.2 ao s11011.1,pp2 szrwaad -apo0 601u0Z aye d0 LE-001 'uot1.OaS `III 010144 ;r41- pOI.o.0 S. 4 `pao0aa ay; • a03 •eaae pae1Caeaa .010. uL-pa.e0oL eq off' saang0na4s Saossaooe saaLnbaa apo3 6utuoZ eq; }o ZE-001 401-100S `III PL01-1ay '9 •)1ueq ao `d4n Lq_ ay; }o doh. ay; woad. 3.•aaj. (001) Taapuny-auo ueyq -ssa1 ;ou pue >iaew aaa.OMy61.y Ra2uLpao 041 woad 100411001) paapuny-auo ss-01. 4ou reg 4as eq oa. . , punoS pUeCsl 6'ual ayp: 04 queo0rp2 sp,oL uo pasodoad s.6uLpLLnq LLe saa,pnbaa [L]y 4dea•6eaedgns `Z'6LL-OOL u91-100S `IX 01.0P-JV 'ti •anuany MaLA punoS 6uo 12 au L 1 R4aadoad 41.toa4 ayp. woad. ;004 001 U21-0- aaow ;o 20.12 paeR4uoa4 aye uc aansoLoua a0uas pue s>loap Lood614wwLMs punoa6121 a;20oL 0a. uoLssLwaad and 3s-001. 10[1.00S 'III a10L-ay (q) pue 2'6LL-00L u0L2oaS `IX 0L0.1.4.a11 (2) :so suoLsLAoad aye woa} • ,aOueLaPA'-e s4senbaa ;uoLLedde ay; `uoL;eo!Ldde sLq; S8 '£ • 8861 `b1 ,taenuer paaapueN U0 .Spa0 WI13S ANSON 40 aa41.eW 169E 'oN ' Eddy - Z abed 4 r• 7 � i 1 J f Page 3 - Appl . No. 3691 - Matter of HOSNY SELIM Decision Rendered January 14, 1988 of the Application of HOSNY SELIM ,under Appl . No. 3691, in the frontyard area, PROVIDED THE POOL: 1 . Be situated in a north-south direction, rather than the requested east-west direction; 2. Be located closer to the. easterly side property line with a setback at not less than 1.5 feet from the 'east line and not less than •36 feet from the westerly side property line; That the actual -pool construction be not closer than 36 feet to the west property line; the actual deck and fence construction be -not closer than 30 feet to the westerly property line; 4. That the proposed construction remain unroofed (as proposed) ; 5. Sufficient evergreen screening be placed and maintained on both sides of the proposed construction (with minimum three-ft. high evergreens, six foot apart, for the full distance; 6. That there be no overhead or adverse lighting in the , yard areas; • 7. That house lighting, if any, be shielded to.the property. 8. Proper measures to be taken to insure that final eleva- tions and grades will not result in storm-water surface runoff flowing onto adjoining property or off-site. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, and Sawicki . (Members Doyen and Douglass were absent due to illnesses'. ) This resolution was duly adopted. 1 k - � ? GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, C1-AIRMAN January 29, 1988 1 f a /.., NOTICE OF HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following hearings will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS; . at a Regular Meeting at the 'Southold Town Hall , Main Road, - Southold, New York, on THURSDAY, DECEMBER '10; "1987 at the following times: 7:30 p.m. Appl . No. 3566 THEODOSE TRATAROS and ERAKLIS APODIACOS. Variance to the Zoning, Ordinance, :Article III, Section 100-31 , Bulk Schedule, for approval of insufficient - . lot area of proposed Parcel #1 -in this pending set-off division of land located along the south side :of the Main - Road, and. extending along the east side of Wiggins Lane, . Greenport, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 35, Block 5, Lot 3, containing a total area of 3.262 acres. _ 7:35 p.m. Appl. No. 3694 - THERESA CZECH. Variance . , • to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100=31 ,Bulk Schedule, for approval of the 'construction of open deck with an insufficient rearyard setback from the east property line at premises known as 150 Goldin Lane, Southold, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 135, block 2 , Lot 19. 7:40 p.m. Appl . No. 3695 - HENRY J. SMITH & SON. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, Section 100-80(B) for permission to construct truck-storage building in this "C-Light industrial" Zoning District at premises •known as 2740 Peconic Lane, Peconic, AY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 74, Block 2, Lot 19.1 . 7:45 p.m. Appl . No. '3689 - PETER AND DIANE LUHRS. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII , Section 100-70(B) for permission to construct addition for a repair station in conjunction with Special Exception Permit #3161 rendered October 11 , 1983, at premises known as 45845 North Road, Southold, NY; County Tax. Map District 1000, Section 55, Block 02, Lot 17. Zone District: "8-1 ." 7:50 p.m. Appl . No-. 3691 - HOSNY SELIM. Variance toj the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32 and o I I' . Page 2 - Notice of i-.erings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting - December 10, 1987 ` Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to locate inground swimmingpool with decks and fence enclosure landward of existing dwelling in the front yard and within TOO feet ofc/: the Long Island Sound, at premises known as 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 94, Block 01 , Lot 07. 8:05 p.m. Appl . No. 3696 - RICHARD MASS. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for per- mission to locate open wooden deck with a setback of less. than 75 feet from existing bulkhead along canal , at premises known as 50 Willow Point Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map District 1000,• Section 56, Block 5, Lot 25. . 8:10 p.m. Appl . No. 3676 - ANTHONY ROBUSTELLI . Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Articles: (a) III , Section 100-31 as to insufficient rear yard and side yard, and (b) XI, Section 100-119.2 as to insufficient setback from bulkhead and ordinary highwater mark, dnd (c) III, 'Section 100-31 as to excessive lot coverage, for the proposed construction - of a deck addition, at premises known as 5 Haywaters Road, Cutchogue, NY; Lot 23 and part of 22, Peconic Bay Properties; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 111 , Block 1 , Lots 19 and 18. 8:15 p.m. Appl . No. 3671 - ANDRE AND THOMAS CYBULSKI. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III , Section 100-30A for permission to utilize premises for book-publishing operations , wholesale book storage, and updated 280-A approval over the existing private right-of-way for such use. Zone District: "A" Residential and Agricultural . Location .of Property: West Side Depot Lane, Cutchogue , NY; D;strict 1000, Section 96, Block 5, Lot 1 .2 ard ,part of 1 .1 . 8:25 p.m. Appl . No. 3543 - 'PETER AND BARBARA HERZ. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to locate new single-family dwelling with insufficient setbacks from existing bulk- head and from highwater areas along Midway Inlet and Hog Neck Bay, premises known as 70 Cedar Point Drive, Southold, NY; Cedar Beach Park Map, Part of Lots 152 and 110, County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-90-02-13.1 . • Page 3 - Notice of. Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting - December 10, 1987 8:40 p.m. Appl . No. 3561 - DOROTHY L. ROBERTSON. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 , Bulk Schedule, for approval of the insufficient lot area of two proposed parcels in this pending set-off division of land with frontage along the south side of • _ North View Drive, the east side of Private Road and the north side of South View Drive, Orient, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 13, Block 1 , Lot 10. 8:55 p'.m. Appl . No. '3686 - FREDERICK AND DIANE RAYMES. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Articles: (a) XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to locate dwelling with a -setback of less than 75 feet from existing bulkhead along Gull Pond Inlet, (b) III, Section 100-31 , for permission to locate dwelling with an insufficient frontyard setback, at premises known as 704 Wiggins Lane, Greenport, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 35, Block 4, Lot 19. The Board of Appeals will hear at said time and place all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in each of the above matters. Each hearing will not start before the time allotted. Written comments may be submitted prior to the conclusion of the subject hearing. .For more informa- tion, please call 765-1809. Dated: November 18, 1987. BY ORDER OF THS S'OUTHOLD TOWN BOARD:OF APPEALS • GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN Linda Kowalski, Hoard Secretary x • • • \ 4 FORM NO.3 '� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD,N.Y. - NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No. Date © a , 19 21 To :.�. ..... �. ;-s as,, S54.o:.4) . ' c1z,,.L. 20.1. l l 9 z PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated 4 °-QA24, a°1 , 19.Z3 3.. for permit to construct 0.c c2-Q-41'd'u1 G�?� �"l� at Location of Property , v( � Qum . r t !c,. -t House No. Street Ham/at County Tax Map No. 1000 Section o°1-[ Block o� Lot ...G1...... . Subdivision Filed,Map No. Lot No. is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds . 5 ' c.-4nr, 1 aD-3i tRa,v„.ate...2 eec.A. w-ci a per . c�aDS1 11.9 • z Building Inspector RV 1/eo • F 4 ti , TOWN OF•SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INVIN9B2 APPEAL NO. 3 67 NOV 0 6 DATE Nov;..:iaL:987... TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,1:00, 3OLD,1N. Y. • • F, (We) —EDS=Y SELIM of ..1671.lerANDIAIW`75 Name of Appellant • Street and Number • . ' .ti...W.4QA 'RB',r N.Y•1.1.5$1.HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON AFIRLICATION FOR PERMIT NO. DATED Oct. 29,1987 WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO ..HRSAV...AELIM Name of Applicant for permit of 8o Soundview Ave Mattitubk N.Y. Street and Number Municipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY • (X) Permit to construct an accessory swimming pool and fence. • 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY .85.? Soundview Ave Street /I1amlet / Use District on Zoning Map District 1000 Section 094-Block 02.0t07 Current Owner Hosny 5elim Mop No. Lot No. Prior OwnerJoseph&Jat:queline GUIDO 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED dndicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Poragroph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article III Section 100-32 Li lly.2 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (please check appropriate box) (g)- A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Low Chop. 62 Cons. Lows Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 ( ) 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has)(has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for o special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No. Dated REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (X) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) . is requested for the reason that Article III Section 100-32, Accessory permitted in rear yard only. Action required by zoning board of appeals. Article XI Section 119.2,constructing within 100' of bluff. Variance needed. Form ZB1 (Continue on other side) • 0..t .'Y' 2?' is i t'ioop'i . {g :gnus iH i1ai18au I f f t REASON FOR APPEAL • Continued i ds(fN4g 1. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE CE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because :;:`' i Accessory couldn't bA„p,onstructed in rear yard as it is located between the existing house and the .bluff. • 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shored by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because House is close to the bluff. • • 3 The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because Front yard is over 176° long. Neither the existing house nor the proposed accessory will be visible,from the main road (Soundview Are). • STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) 55 ,� . COUNTY OF ) Signa ure Sworn to this CX./L4PI day of / '' 107 taige Notary Public LINDA WEeBe Notary Public,state of New Wes No E4-4767528 y C ��j BOARD OF HEALTH ,5. 'F Cl NY 3 SETS OF PLANS c'''- •' OF s4411" ;... ;iyi': FORM NO,1 SURVEY ]k�t WR 47 al, '; II TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CHECK i�' ° IBUILDING DEPARTMENT SEPTIC FORM • Vii"_....,US.El o !T. 1 TOWN HALL NOTIFY t .Tgvf;0','SOt;�OI.D __s. . SOUTHOLD,N.Y. 11971 , TEL.:765-1802 CALL MAIL TO: Examined , 19 .1 Approved\ \0 1 - , 194 I.Permit No l 1/ aV"a a,_,`,-- Disapproved a/c • � h , ' (Building Inspector) ' APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date lb? , 102. I~ - . t• INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector,with 3 'sets of plans,accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas,and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this appli- cation. ,,',.; co The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. '' d. Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit ' •shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. T e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy `=2`,• ;shall have been granted by the Building Inspector. .14 ` 'APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the ..4.- I Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York,and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or /.; ;Regulations, for the'construction of buildings,additions or alterations,or for removal or demolition,as herein described. , ; ,The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances,bu'i,' ;: code,housing code,and regulations?and to admit,authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary insp: ••ns. �� r , _.----\___ -, .}'' �/7�(Sir' ature of applicant,or name,if a corporation) r�/ ''ti; J0 M ?..,- ak /-las /14 4,4'l'c. pct -�i• • (Mailing address f applicant) j/9 4-0-v., „•t. ,State whether applicant is.owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. ,+I' hies�V SL. ; . Fi• a of owner of premises :al.:. (as on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation,signature of duly authorized officer. • '1P , : Wn`���='J int ,t,,,i ,, (Name and title of corporate officer) • I ” w ,Builder's 4. N's License No. ,M,U /o•B SUFFOLK COUNTY LICENSED ' •;it... s :Plumber's License No. • - i '':' ' ; ,- :Electrician's License No. • 1;4 ;' I ;;Other Trade's License No. .... ys-s— , .-?1,1::1i,:Location of land on which proposed'work will be done: Fr) So uNJ/1 Pt l U '`'i,i•?;i`1 mouse Number Street Hamlet -<--"e•-.) •;;,;1',r "county Tax Man No. 1000 Section F LI Block 1 ( Lot r) 'I:-•'•i;' Sibdivision Filed Map No. Lot tii,41t',a''i (Name) I .tt::il:x'9• I t°,i;21,1}'tate existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: il; M1,' xtt' i 'Og ! j '. 0 Existing use and occupancy d LI- ,�,•1. ,�e-Q%�'e.'L L i.9 „ 'ON Y, I Intended use and occupy * r ' -..... ./4.........—.... .. ...., A . . 3. stark(check which applicable):New Building Addition ...,,h Alteration • .kevair Removal Demolition Other Work (Description) , 5-4(..1 , Ek--a, ---- 4. Estimated Cost .1 Fee •,. (to be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling,number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor .- . If garage,number of cars 6. If business,commercial or mixed occupancy,specify nature and extent of each type of use 7. Dimensions of existing structures,if any: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories ' Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions:Front Rear -Depth Height Number of Stories B. Dimensions of entire new construction:Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 9. Size of lot:Front Rear Depth , IO. Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner II. Zone or use district in which premises are situated 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law,ordinance or regulation: 13. Will lot be regraded Will excess fill be removed from premises: Yes No 14. Name of Owner of premises Address Phone No. Name of Architect Address Phone No. Name of Contractor Address • Phone No. 15. Is this property located within 300 feet of a tidal wetland?:*Yes No *If yes, Southold Town Trustees Permit may_be required. PLOT DIAGRAM Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and.indicate all set-back dimensions from property lines.Give street and block number or description according to deed,and show street names and indicate whether interior or corner lot. 4 . . , . / , . . ' • — • i • , . ' . . • . , . ' . • .-s.., . ,,, :. '4 ; z • 3TATE0FNEW;iyoRK, • S S. I -t'l4.11';: being duly sworn,deposes and says that he is the applicant of individual signing contract); . -,‘ tbove painep'.: ,;:-1';,Iir•', ,!:', ie is e.,•41.6.:,t'.1 (Contractor,agent,corporate officer,Cc.) )f saic4i ,:-:: r:'-i owners,and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this ipplic '1:t Vi,, Ail statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the vork 1 i.l.:, rmed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. ;worn 9... .. '-. e this day of *a4.e._ , 19 Pl.' i * * ***tit; pi4iti,1 .,7 4. 14: thipli It- , DA ae- County cjt io.: 15)7 T I './-- -------------- '4:'''Ff'.;`• V'' ' ' t 414:6:4‘ __ . 1 .1,z MARY PUBLIC,State of Bieu Itit .,ir •• (Signature of applicant) • ,..r.•:: I nO.4707 878,Suffolk Counk...-7 • Term awes;Batch 30,19..— la•o _xi y- / - 7 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CA '!D /i - /4 OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. ,....SUB.-- LOT `r .. ;r - -( ,r. '7S cro 1.Y/ 4 f 1- c r ., ci -1-..,,,...,.. ' t2MER •WNER N /00.06 E ACR. iaY �t�-ul 1�51.1iciq --Pl•U. -:.c:-.el(. 'S. sre i j.z l Ek 1 , ?/7 A", .-A_°_ w.,' SS ioc,s- ..r � W_ - TYPE OF BUILDING ° e _-_ w._/t4 o4.w E ie Y _f)Nr�5e .din-,../ _/Xe-t- a __I cX 1all___•-- I'4i 11.44-tet.- � ES, c1. a !SEAS. T. VL. -• . FARM COMM. CB. MISC. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS .i-r.,..0,26.-.4_a.22.,„:47 b..5-'(.2 Q %2.- ,•, ' SAO _ �$---e'o et,---c249 vy/1-Y/6-3 --- - - - -. -�'.�,;%w,.-42-- j "`-97 ;.:;Z.,r 6770- --- , /S'e,n go 0 ,..:33 0 -.47- 4,/,g-7/714 1-e , : -_ , _ /_re O I Z O O 2 G O / I-470/4 J V•Z/ / ci; C1 .;.^./ ,,,r,•'P_— '/1271 SIILt '134',Sao. R.W.Plow FRY 4-Elam. To 4 // ColeC.CI CWF AGE BUILDING CONDITION ,o/ /B3 .1L.,i) l5a•,cal,(..ryiniGU,ui)o)el 1120.02.0 Ica GUI IX)-f----`41-52- P 347 I N NORMAL BELOW ABOVE .B6- f OCA ' _ -6 5 'Ii i+c' 75 f.oClt RM Acre Value Per Value - . Acre 32,: i 187 £P/S783 Z d /c aa(GI--i r , CC..4 9.5-0D.. ' — Tillable 1 ' Tillable 2 - 'Tillable 3 • 'Woodland ,�. _ ' 'Swampland FRONTAGE ON WATER 7 0 0,p (, . C,� off' •ts1): - 170-0 'BrushlandFRONTAGE ON ROAD /1)a;.l-S" - - •• i- House Plot ,.,.. DEPTH a..c.+>5..r.„.3 9 S o ' . - BULKHEAD Total // . DOCK i ` Y. ' ' , . ^ � . ' . ._ / COLOR ,is 41, k k'. I sl'i: %V+, • � / --- _-_- - TRIM - . _-,-, _ 4 ' ____-` /''�'', ' � — ' —Fi . _ . � ,- - _-_- ' — .. ` �� --- ; ets` � ~ _ \.:':'5'4-': �- I '- ^` / ' .- �- _ '.-~_-_ -w:P1154 l'A. . i's ' Bath / . Dinette .. � K �� — ' K. Bldg- � ' ~. � /� � � `- Floors �,` _�/'u �� ��`� Foundation Basement n __� • Extension Finish ~ ' / ,_- Ext. Walls �^f�� �=' mxun nuo nepae . H � ) o� -- . _ . rn,enoo �oo"o �mp/oo, BR _- _ '~ - . --_ 'Pooh � Re ,��/pmKo�r Roomso"uFmo FIN ' • - - . •rw4r/l- -1< ; t1, 4- 65Dormer ___� l oew0F < 1yww ` )+ a� _�� �u/ . Driveway ` ~ . 'Gomse __ _ Pa � __ - _ ___� ` O. B. --_ -__ '___ __ Total . `^/4�' it/ � _ ' _ ~ ' '° . ^ . . ` ` - - - e , 1 v, 1 I r r x� f/��'' _ .Ir -'.. 'rt i i � i}•.�.. f I S C]I,�iI 1 �,! 1 �/ 7 �. t.. .;.'7 �t �'��� 7 II t,_ ;1�. f 1� I PN v S/ N G `I° L. / s,• 1.. SOU .0d , 9 ,•o- J• (4H a Cc^E -• .-• •. MAP OF N 68 93 .7- o TUCIC \ ..-,_ DESCRIBEDATMATT PROPERTY OPERTY �� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD /- -7---- Z•. - _..4SUFFOLK CO,N Y i /0% 10✓4/y`• ,tri, • °/ rrn 45 ' i // / A ,�` It e• ztj I ,�� V Z z 1 -, t r • . T 419iJ q b K In\\ ko 9%.0I _ ,1 m Qoo\ cltr o I i\ �I - \ ‘...\ 'cl, V1 -x. .:\ . -k \ \ o i s�0 0 \r o 10°55 v N U E P IN N, °°'gb eg.5 J1E D g 9 0 13 1 CER TIRED TO " ::: 6U/07 8 ./A01/EL/NE M UX; 1'810 tea. 1 donack associates • '9•., land surveyors and s n <�q�eJ2� yCo�oW ppryq�g�f• consulting engineers' - 313 west main street n n *'' tvl. _-•. riverhead,new york 11901 m • Hy'•49y63 � (516)369-1717 (212) 746-3020 AREA. 36;844 fp LAND 5- 00•I i 198 Jab Ns 83-337 aa3i;aC8E5 _ 1000-094-01-07 Scaler I"=40' 11 V 7. ' 1X\111 • Cj 16.3 ,. .. lA n + 3.9A(c) • t 13 • 70.- !. L1Alc) ew *S• 12.1 .. Re 12AIc1 3 122 r l.OAlcl 21 WO V O 11A1G ,•se,# .. R O 2 — 1ti 11 O• .,,,,, 3.BAIc1 • / . O 0io A PJB B.OAId h e 1011,S4. ...„..../10, 4,.. V 1.OAIc) 3 FOR PCL.NO. FOR PCL.NO. FOR PCL.NO. 2 MAW SEE SEC.NO. 515 SEC,HO. SEE SEC.NO. Q 7...1A10100-02-001 s• 100-02-002 . 10D-02-003 1 --7 Z /over- 6 b MAW MATCH - J %t.',. ''',..7.6.EG1 ^ P Y'! to I �c,� s til 7- R050R O ' O c A6 its .—- -n—- • � 1, LLbvI Loi No. dock 11m11SdaN darks tine —SOH ISA Cleric}LineUNLESS I, L^brhkn Bkck/Ba0.1b. (21) O ire be'irkt lrb —-F—- Refuse delrAt Una —-R—- ARE — / 4 I`SA rt Be.No. \M • Deed �� tater betrkt line —-e—- 141vkbbarkl On —HST—— ME ---' Sestet pner^m et. Cc.,ry Lne -- LNH[Merle,Ll —-L—- IrbrDistrict le—-•e - �K_—P G 's Toeea Area 12.1 Atdor 12.1A loe,LN• —__ drli barks tire —-r—- earteeter perklne—RR—- AlIBULyI{;y I 0 4,4 F11 rcleitttsb Meo 121 AIC) eddi LI^e —_--- Sever b.nkt Arlo —_S— S., I . i '''0 a^ - +m e 1§iii eLl - 9 ,,,„1.1a' s�yP • Y : J Ara RESEPVEO o C. E1 01E1•C n I / .LC n^ 4!6 s F. 13 NO • ili e 17 7.OAIc1 O u^ _ RE VED Ara Al 9.9 AREA'e• tiA Se+d\ nt ►. s 4.6AIc1 A 84 4.. 95 ►tiS` T' q 1 .ffi t � r , a f tII . Ii , f 'ic^.J.11;--'-'4:•••1. ' k yet a� , P ' fr . ,. • r t:::j " 1r R ` if LL7 •'�9 lam k 1 d ' i�-} ,� „..,..:%.- �. aD u3, „, d` fe: wr „„yy ...... r Y f r ► d7'- "!1 a • 1 • j f.1l� , :`fir,„ p It . ,- , „wzrogli � �i : - ^ -" i4' 40 ,te - r• J. •Wt + ' ,t q • • e64.1yr# k pNpt� ~ q a' •._ I _-r \. APR 18 2007 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD X In the Matter of the Application of ADRIENNE LANDAU For a Variance of the Zoning Code Article XXII Section 280-116 Subsection A(1) and (3) and Interpretation of Town Code Article 280-116 Section A(3). X COPIES OF DETERMINATIONS AFFECTING PROPERTY 1) Building Department Notice of Disapproval dated April 4, 2007; 2) Decision of Town Trustees dated August 23, 2006,together with permit and approved plans; 3) Suffolk County Department of Health Services permit dated November 19, 2006, together with approved plans; 4) Decision of Zoning Board of Appeals dated January 14, 1988 regarding construction of pool with copy of application. Anthony C. Pasca, Esq. Esseks, Hefter & Angel, LLP Attorneys for Applicant 108 East Main Street Riverhead,NY 11901 (631) 369-1700 James F. King,President 01 *OF SOT" Jill M. Doherty,Vice-President '�O ;«`" Town Hall lQ 53095 Route 25 Peggy A. Dickerson P.O. Box 1179 Dave Bergen : vs ' ' Southold,New York 11971-0959 John Holzapfel rti41iN =f'y ," O i of Telephone(631) 765-1892 �C�U � dFax(631) 765-6641 ... ,,,, 0 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL, BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction, hay bale line 1st day of construction / 1/2 constructed �/ Project complete, compliance inspection. r Ij isil SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATED AT MATTITUCK • . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . . . . .: • SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK . S.C. TAX No. 1000-94.-01 -07 SCALE 1"=20' NOVEMBER 18, 2005 , FEBRUARY 2, 2006 ADDED PROPOSED HOUSE � JULY 31, 2006 REVISED PROPOSED HOUSE OCTOBER 30, 2006 REVISED - • i AREA = 31,772.62 sq. ft. "r (m TS uss 0.729 sc. ' &BULKHEAD) . . t. - if . CERTIFIED TO: - EDWARD FAGIN ANDRIENNE LANDAU j -f i ' • EXISTING LOT COVERAGE • ZIPTION AREA % LOT COVERAGE • { 1,167 sq. ft. 3.67% iI836 sq. ft. 2.63% NO'E LEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED 1'0 N.G.V.D. 1929 DATUM ifE@L6111 i 'rn , 512 sq. ft. 1.61% E c EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS:3°.° '703 j 839 sq. ft. 2.64% EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: — ———30———— pK, I `•.j , - - R a a T r - er • . . • • ,. • • \ • . . . . _ . •••. . PO • :A:.4" \ er'••••T.1:•'" , ...!...4 i.;•14.'3. 3 3•7'.3.O4..,1,1.1 . ''''.•,"T..3 ft,.J•11••%.71 eti:.14•i• ';•••...•rr..P.I•wri 4.. or:a7.•:), . . .1:1..1:1•'••j.1... Vr4i....1:0‘ii:••"• '' .• . ..!•"••re••'•;/:..':••••?..1•••1.;dA:k•e••••!•4•••••;r;P.;;S:',1:r`l• ;•)!.2.:•:....W?a•e.i"gpt.:ki . .4••.' •: •••••,64Zr.:1"'I 11.'14 4‘41-.3. ,.,2$31/Z 2. .",-,;: 7t`-,q•••i,•1•4! 1 /-'r,...C.I..7.'7. : :vi::0•%?5•:'•7•:;1:.:'•':i:.1.4,-,17,1-,..:.:4••;i• • '"•":' s 1:••. :•4•:f 47.4-,••I*).•?*.....';•.';••,•,C•1;1:,,:••,....41.'1.z•-I'At.i4v41'...'ii•:"32•1fil MN Ti TO313 :••""Le's•••re':•1'%It Tr t. ..."' 14"i3:;.!..y.., ••••,,f, ....:,•,..e.••••.;•:,l'iii'AA•..;•./`..i'.•T!:.)..•••.!..,-. -f.;.1.1 41.1... 4-. . /4. • loNtir=i3R,11 .____ ____ so ---- ._ f,/.a. , , .1mlep!!• 111.1101111.:•"..-. .: .,.1.5j., , •.,..., .. .. •iigi.'.."-'77.--. ..'. ., ......: , .-' '.A.• • 73 ----- ,. , •,.... • ".. • II*.•1..'. •t•• .. •: ,:- , 4. .; 10- \ • ze — — # ........ A.' ef 0. •'''' •"*.. \ • .g.. ..:___,_,.._ _--- '----— \ t i xX. ...iv :\-.. \A .. • 6.1 14 :...'.' 0••.. tk \A ad • 3 47 \ •V.1% :,-''a f ki'• 4' if d ..>..: -<.4\ \ ,...... ... ....\ , '..: 1.-.9z.•0., ••.. i. ..., , k ‘ \ /4• • 4. ..' . ....._ aiva CHU-SO(3 E711.3H i 01 MUM.0230-,-- . .' t \ \ \ AS r..! fciti:.:,---.7,— .• , • • . 4 :.:: . A , , ,,,, . ... .q.: •.....• -__ ; e // •'°.1// v•-,f,....:,: ,_, W3L. . ---- , i tl- 1 k 1 \ • •..?.....;2.\.,..ori„,,,,;3;„....,........„,_____I 1 , A . CY.. .... \ / (.. •• •t:. , ,A•• 4 .."/•• . i lar 0 P I / A' \ \ . /r' / 1 y• ; % i s . 1• .: \ . .-. -r".. \--• 'L*-til \ _4 I .., ; • -• 4 \• . ,......, •-; • . . t\•:, :e., Vssii 1 •• I '''',7-3 , ..'•.1 iii: • .,).!y.• ...--' '',.;•. . •' :. i •:`,I. k ' . , •• .. ./ .,.• al. ,, ' ...0.„..::,,,.•:' .i I (wit \ \ ,--— , t"5\---' . :..... ' .. • • • • . .'.6 ----%'''- 1.01:201-1___:,—el-----------1 • : .9"9t,------- 1..- -' Og---.7:r6 *. t# 0 — .._. , ',OP --, . •• • 32H34 MaIll OHO , t i .t.'4. • •L ___\\ --------.----,,.— 6.. SIDRClailMT33 . • •A A. 35... it'r ••• .4 A.. ' , •..••. 1 t \ ;4? 0 TIM ''. I k .•• 11'4,\ k, -SO ,0 C 9 IS ; t '' : .f. W• ‘‘,. .. c t el -Li3 i . t.es P110 ts bi . • ..• .. ,:•' t..\'‘ n• % EZi ° d y . 4 : 13 473 P I s.1 . R , E )ECK 93 sq. ft. 0.z93 - - f PROPOSED LEACHING POOL CARPORT 439 sq. ft. 1.38% TOTAL 5,390 sq. ft. 16.96% I ®PROPOSED SEPTIC TANK :OL 5. THE LOCATION OF WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN HEREON ARE Ff20M FIELD ! OBSERVATIONS AND/OR MD OBTAINED HFAROM OTHERS. 6. FILLEDNWITHPCLEAN SANDSINUACCORDAN E WITH S.C.D.HD .S.LSTANDARDS�THER BE•REMOVED OR , 7. PROPOSED 8' DIAMETER X 8' DEEP DRYWELLS FOR ROOF RUN—OFF; • • • i TEST HOLE DATA °�ANGE waH THE MWIMUM PREPMIsAny.„..1., $SURVEYS AS ESTABLISHED II iv (TEST HOLE DUG BY McDONALD GEOSCIENCE ON OCTOBER 27, 2005) sT ', ROVED ANDADOPTEa/ r� f'. a YORx SfAiE LAND DMA BRAWN uwI OL /.Q' g •.k( {' - • MOH sur CLAYcL " ,Lr.o e s�Ota 'F'..-,%:-.-::- -:-Va P. ,i I ti.c`;_M EnrS0 LPA • i c+T N.Y.S. L1c: I 1.32;;•0•.: A.:tn_ PALE BROWN TWE 70 COARSE SAO al UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION DR AD01110N "`•-�•� TO OF SECTI THIS 7209 O THE VIOLATION STATE Joseph A. Ingeg l : EDUCATION LAW Land Sul`1fe COPIES OE THIS SURVEY MAP NDT BEARING yeti -i'..':''-, � �''t•� • lgryp SURyE(aR'S U7xm BFAL OA ':':t•'. SEAL SHALL NDT BE CONSRIERED _ - _ - �+;�;3 t _ _ �.,',. t TO�g�A VAUa TRUE COPY- I �•1 - "" '' •r+.!:::,i _ ,.•q::�"'. CERTIFICATIONS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN MAIp.L0C1;1,..nSGBALtoxr2L, > ' , THE PFASON FOR WHON THE RUN_. S-Subdiv(sioPS - Sita PIDns _ ; ;?a�^i,r ..;F• 5',, ,, ,r. - ... - tY ONLY 7a TIOe Survay` '4 S ',0-;l'i „' O pR70 TH,ANO DN HIR BEH M THE AN^.y'..,}3i:�.p;.. 5"�,�`..,2•..�rr..Fi•,,�R3..'?” TIRE COMPANY.G°YQiNMEM ° Fa (61)"�"'`�.r - `�" 1',.,;,z�'-`y,'•C �l•'t.- _ - OINCC OF 1EN01NLISTED C INm- PH ( ) 090":'�.r. [ oL�a: e,' :. ND NG IN RABIEONE 631 727-2-�; ,,• •;. ,. c .yI.<• .��r ,:y h .• %4�.';...k TTII1p M..CERTIFICATIONS ARE N- I - ''� ;�:.r�;;�-����:?,_ �«�h �I•�_ ,�r,.,�: - - cEs LaraTED ArI1.;tr ;; =�`',;I •; - ,.±. \4,: E r?•q , ;,,€.,. ;airt i _ 0 OKE AVENUE":pry ^1'' - - •+ 'y' ^ -'" ;�' �::i' ?fr^`'�•'+`..'I'' • THE IXISTENCE oFS O RECORDYIF 322 R NaW York 11901 New Y F I*as=' ,TA u'y 1 :g t I n _ _ ,- AND/DR BASEMENT RIVERHEAD, Riverhead. L` -1 „w" a.`.0 t(:-t� :.,i,�. ..Li a.• TEED. W ^'.=`'r -�;f.'-_Yi'" '' ,:.:: r; a' •�"���.t>,-i• -,' - �`-` -'�� -_ ANY.NDT SHOWN ARE NDT-cuARAN • . :�;bx '�5' ' a•`3'�I to a:, ,'` ,,�1' a's- ,3 ^,"%,'. K„ 7 1 ' QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A.APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? ❑Yes DiNo B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? No ❑Yes, please explain on attached sheet. C. 1)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? Yes 2)Are these areas shown on the map submitted with this application? Yes 3)Is the property bulkheaded between the wetlands area and the upland building area? Yes 4)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? Yes Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: 1 Dermit granted on 8/23/06 and if issued, please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved map. D. Is there a depression or slopin7 elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? �O E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? None (Please show area of these structures on a diagram if any exist. Or state"none"on the above line, if applicable.) F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? No If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department and describe: G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? No If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your map with this application. H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel single—family residence and proposed use single—family residence • (exa, pie- existing• single-family; proposed: same with garage or pool,or other description.) Authoriz-• Signature and Date 2/05, 1/07 ` 0 1c,= ANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FO ]n4 21.',104:31.kAAPPLICA TO OWNER, CONTRACT VENDEE A ND AGENT:101P V'tThe Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers "';Yfi '' and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of ` N possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. tf,s': t s.: (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Variance/Interpretation XXX Special Exception *Other Approval or Exemption from plat or official map Change of Zone Tax Grievance *If"Other"name the activity: Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a .partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or em.lo ment b a co .oration in which the Town officer or em.lo ee owns more than 5% o the shares YES NO XXX If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated: Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant, agent or contract vendee) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her.spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director,partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted th' '""'day of A Dri't, 2007 Signature: �AA0/n/.L2 J I ,, . Print Name: .Adrienne Landa 04/12/2007 10:28 FAX 6312836136 EN-CONSULTANTS,INC. Z002 Town of Southold LSP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency, *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other,ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and advcrse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency, review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, l�istIng both subporting and non sunportingfacts. .If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be undertaken, A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 94 - 1 - 7 PROJECT NAME .Landau The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board a Planning Board El Building Dept. Q Board of Trustees 0 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital ❑ construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) • ❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: Nature and extent of action: Renovate, partially restructure, and expand existing one-story, 3-bedroom dwelling into proposed two-story, 4 bedfoom dwelling; replace existing pool patio: relocate and upgrade sanitary system: and install drainage system of drywells, all as depicted on the site plan prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno, last dated July 31 , 2006 . 04/12/2007 10:28 FAX 6312836136 EN-CONSULTANTS,INC. Z003 , Location ofaction: 855 Soundview Avenue; Mattituck Site acreage: 0 . 729 Present land use: Residential, one-family dwelling. Present zoning classification: R-4 0 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Adrienne Landau , (b) Mailing address: Penthouse 1A, 350 West 50th Street New York, NY 10019 (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) 212-4 5 9-1 9 8 0 ' (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes CJ No 0 If yes,which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. n Yes n No n Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria E Yes E sPNo 1 X 1 Not Applicable 04/12/2007 10:28 FAX 6312836136 EN-CONSULTANTS,INC. Z004 { , •• Board of Trustees Appl Gtion GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet):31,772.62 SQ.FT. Area Zoning: R-40 Previous use of property: RESIDENTIAL. Intended use of property:NO CHANGE. • • Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): RENOVATE,PARTIALLY RESTRUCTURE,AND EXPAND EXISTING ONE-STORY,3-BEDROOM DWELLING INTO PROPOSED TWO-STORY,4-BEDROOM DWELLING;REPLACE EXISTING POOL PATIO; RELOCATE AND UPGRADE SANITARY SYSTEM;AND INSTALL DRAINAGE SYSTEM OF DRYWELLS, ALL AS DEPICTED ON THE SITE PLAN PREPARED BY JOSEPH A.INGEGNO,LAST DATED JULY 31, 2006. 04/12/2007 10:28 FAX 6312836136 EN-CONSULTANTS,INC. Z005 • • Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect s;cenie resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria E Yes Q No Q Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section Ill[—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria E Yes No El Not Applicable - Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold, See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria .i Yes [ No Not Applicable All new construction shall be located landward of the preexisting crest of bluff setback and more than 100 feet from wetlands. To ensure consistency with Policy 5, a row of row of staked haybales and project limitin fence will be installed landward of the crest of bluff to contain site disturbance during construction; a drainage system of drywells will be installed to capture and recharge roof runoff from new dwelling; and an upgraded sanitary system will be installed to provide Attach additional sheets if necessary proper treatment of on-site septic waste Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including, Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III— Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. xl Yes 0 No[3 Not Applicable 04/12/2007 10:28 FAX 6312836136 EN-CONSULTANTS,INC. e1006 • ' The project will b, ,onsistent with Policy 6 a_ it will not create any new clearing or site disurbance or stage any new construction closer to the crest of bluff or tidal waters than—the existing structure to be renovated and ex anded u ward and landward. Moreover, temporary and permanent mitigation will be provided via the measures outlined in Policy 5 (see above) . Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section ffi — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Q Yes E No 2 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes C� No Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria.- I I Yes No I :..1 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORNG COAST POLICIES 04/12/2007 10:29 FAX 6312836136 EN-CONSULTANTn,.tNC. al 007 1 1 Volley 10. Protect Southolt___,`eater-dependent uses and promote'au.ng of new water-depenadent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No E Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and-- Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. 1 1 Yes ❑ No 1J Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary . Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. El Yes ❑ No E Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13, Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section EU—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No EI Not Applicable At Coastal PREPARED BY TITLE Management Spec. DATE 8/2/06 Robert Herrmann Amended on 8/1/05 I- ADRIENNE LANDAU 350 West 50th Street,PH1A New York,New York 10019 April 13,2007 Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road Southold,NY 11971 Re: Premises of Adrienne Landau 855 Soundview Avenue,Mattituck,NY Dear Sir/Madam: I,Adrienne Landau, owner of the property identified as SCTM No. 1000-094.00-01.00- 007.000 in Mattituck,New York,hereby authorize Esseks,Hefter&Angel,LLP to act as my agent and handle all necessary work involved in the variance process with the Zonin y.and o Appeals. 040 Adrienne Landau Sworn to before me this d.y of April,2007. Notary P Mow_ HOWARD EFRAN No.Notary Public,State of New York Qualified in Queens Commission Expires /1<®E SU(/,' ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE � '` 0 ; Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK ; P.O. Box 1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS G Q ,� Southold, New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER Fax(631) 765-6145 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER `,o/4 w`^�,'l�� Telephone (631) 765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER a oUN�, � southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A.Neville DATED: April 19, 2007 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 6033 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeals No. 6033 of Adrienne Landau-the Application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Also enclosed is a letter from Anthony C. Pasca,who is a representative for the owners, describing the enclosed documents, Authorization Letter from the owner for Esseks, Hefter &Angel, LLP to act on her behalf, Transactional Disclosure Form, Applicant's Project Description, Questionnaire for Filing with the Z.B.A. Application, LWRP Consistency Assessment Form, Addendum to Application, Tax Map of the property, aerial map from Google Earth,Notice of Disapproval dated April 4, 2007, decision of Town Trustees dated August 23, 2006, Building Permit No. 6424, Survey, Suffolk County Department of Health Services permit dated November 19, 2006 with approved plans, decision of Z.B.A. dated January 14, 1988 regarding the construction of a pool with Application for Building Permit, Site Plan with Zoning Calculations, Demo Plan, Foundation Site Plan, Foundation Plan, Ground Floor Plan, First Floor Plan, Roof Plan, East/North Elevation, West/South Elevation and Exterior Views. ZBA TO TOWN CLERK CHECK TRANSMITTAL SHEET (Filing of Application and Check for Processing) DATE: 4/18/07 _ZBA# NAME CHECK # AMOUNT TC DATE STAMP RECEIVED 6033 Landau, Adrienne 2161 $600.00 APR 1 8 2007 Southold Town Clerk . TOTAL $600.00 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 ` Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 04/18/07 Receipt#: 2161 Transaction(s): Reference Subtotal 1 1 Application Fees 6033 $600 00 Check# 2161 Total Paid: $600 00 Name: Landau, Adrienne 350 West 50th Street Ph 1a New York, NY 10019 Clerk ID: MICHELLE Internal ID 6033 ZBA TO TOWN CLERK CHECK TRANSMITTAL SHEET (Filing of Application and Check for Processing) DATE: 4/18/07 ZBA# NAME CHECK # AMOUNT TC DATE STAMP 6033 Landau, Adrienne 2161 $600.00 TOTAL $600.00 • 0,0pA - J dc FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: January 4, 2006 RENEWED: April 4, 2007 TO: Narofsky Architecture A/C Fagan/Landau 4 W 22nd Street,FL. 5 New York, NY 10010 Please take notice that your application dated January 3, 2006 For permit for to make additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling at Location of property: 855 Soundview Ave., Mattituck County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 94 Block 1 Lot 7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this nonconforming 33,734 square foot lot in the R-40 District is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 280-116 A(1)which states; "All buildings located on lots adjacent to sounds and upon which there exists a bluff or bank landward of the shore or beach shall be set back not fewer than one hundred (100) feet from the top of such bluff or bank." The . o.osed constructi.n . .__,:.,:��:,.y.,,t setback from the toof the bluff / u prized S gnature 0 Note to Applicant:-Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. 3L+ ' \� a • F,,•A A ",: •`'• `� .ri •v.. 9 • a ti.' .i ` gar 'E. - a. 4, ,, - ., 11 /,',„.; - �� i lir ,-, , ., 1 . . •��� �l rTii err d A 1 1 A+ v\'V•"; I 1 .`� 7;/��I �;�n;,:� W4SI t �r,� �1 niilftr^V, k•t x:. .3.{.T..t.:,>d..\ <::lail. .,:,,,:r-S N..l<>.4.Je:l .i.a;.3)✓,M�J.:'A.J. .N:: <:21L: w lejaCN. -:[.Gt j,,.xyG,KQ/ tv.k:H ,> ;y.,:• BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES .:;;Of/ , , f-T ' SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK _0'Z 'F'a if - " \ �r DATE: August 23, 2006 �� :,„ r,1,,,, PERMIT N0. 6424 :k, X1.1.:. 'i7:411 t.AISSUED TO: ADRIENNE LANDAU '!9 :tom/..:n 0„,(.*-4 aBt PROPERTY ADDRESS: 855 SOUNDVIEW AVE.,MATTITUCK 2 qr'; SCTM#94-1-7 , F.. r44 4.,I E AUTHORIZATION • = ,� Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 275 and/or Chapter 111 of the Town Code of the Town of `.,,; .;:,4Af , Southold and in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of Trustees adopted at the meeting held onir+ k F ii -g August 23,2006,and in consideration of application fee in the sum of$250.00 paid by Adrienne Landau, , n.\I •li � and subject to the Terms and Conditions as stated in the Resolution,the Southold Town Board of Trustees p X43 authorizes and permits the following: '�'I%' IP `' ,mac Wetland Permit to renovate,partially restructure, and expand the existing one-story, '� -f '�-4 three-bedroom dwelling into proposed two-story,four-bedroom dwelling; replace existing pool �� • "P4' patio; relocate and upgrade sanitary system; and install drainage system of drywells, and all as depicted on the site plan prepared'by Joseph A. Ingegno last dated July 31, 2006. )7.__ I• J'toi IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said Board of Trustees hereby causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, '1"'' ; and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date. 1,.,--,';I-14 1 ,,,,,,,,,,,,, • , . _\ -r- Z �� rte, ' 4 (,../.... :,-:-.1. . ...\,...74:444tifite .10; 0.,,A,,,w, _,,,A,.?"-fl...Le,,,,,,;" (e4 I 1.=;1..Al*I:-.\ ' t.A-''. '''''1 4(\:!,‘ `-f '''' T::::;04;in l':-I$t Ice wn / h..... 'S M . -.. "c t ::i. .1 V.x' )r:ti?i ..L,•.. /.!1 k �4 � ,� A '” �� � �4� M t W 1 -Me.- )< k J i . t'_ A< u 1 t Kiri /l Itis amu. �f.iAIl,11i ti Y �..� y�� ''�� jPiffi ts. j1 James F. King,President �oi�S SOO/ - Town Hall Jill M.Doherty,Vice-President '�i is s l0 ; 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Peggy A.Dickerson jig jigSouthold,New York 11971-0959 Dave Bergen ; G Q ,�a�� Telephone(631)765-1892 John Holzapfel OOUNT TO f,�a 'lir Fax(631) 765-6641 `,L'S BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 23, 2006 Mr. Robert E. Herrmann En-Consultants, Inc. 1319 North Sea Rd. Southampton, NY 11968 RE: ADRIENNE LANDAU 855 SOUNDVIEW AVE., MATTITUCK SCTM#94-1-7 Dear Mr. Herrmann: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wed., August 23, 2006 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, En-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of ADRIENNE LANDAU applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated August 2, 2006, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 268-5.H, said application was found to be Consistent with Policy 6 of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program policy standards, by the Board of Trustees, and will further the policies by the installation of gutters and drywells to contain the roof run-off, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 23, 2006, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, /r1 ;i: 2 1 WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 275 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of ADRIENNE LANDAU to renovate, partially restructure, and expand the existing one-story, three- bedroom dwelling into proposed two-story, four-bedroom dwelling; replace existing pool patio; relocate and upgrade sanitary system; and install drainage system of drywells, and all as depicted on the site plan prepared by Joseph A. Ingegno last dated July 31, 2006. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of$50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees: $50.00 Very truly yours, 9x14".4$' Jame F. King , President, Board of Trustees JFK/Ims 4-11 Town of Southold cilC` LWRP CONS TENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS 1. A II applicants for perm its* 1. A11a Tow ll of Soudfhold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold W aterfront Consistency Review Law , This assessm eat is intended to supplem ent other inform ation used by a Town of Southold agency in making a d e t e r m illation of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail, listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 94 - 1 _ 7 N1AY 8 2007 PROJECT NAME LANDAU �G`�-�' The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board ❑ Planning Board❑ Building Dept. ® Board of Trustees ❑ (ZBA) Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital U • construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) ❑ (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: VARIANCE RELIEF ITO Nature and extent of action: Renovate,restructure,and expand existing one-story,3-bedroom dwelling into proposed two-story 3-4 bedroom dwelling;replace existing pool patio;relocate and upgrade sanitary system;and install drainage system of drywells,all as depicted on the site plan prepared by Joseph A.Ingegno,last dated October 30,2006,and building plans prepared by Narofsky Architecture&Design,last dated January 22,2007. Location of action:855 Soundview Avenue,Mattituck Site acreage: 0.729 ACRES Present land use: Residential,one-family dwelling. Present zoning classification:R-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant:Adrienne Landau (b)Mailing address: Penthouse 1A,350 West 50th Street New York,NY 10019 (c) Telephone number: Area Code 212-459-1980 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [-I Yes n No 12 Not Applicable The project entails the renovation,restructuring and expansion of an existing dwelling at a previously developed site in a developed community. Policy 1 is not applicable to the project. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III- Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria re r I Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable J The subject property does not contain n es the project affect historic or archaeologicE,__>urces;nor is the project located in a historic maritime area. Policy 2 is not applicable to the project. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ®Yes I I No I I Not Applicable Inasmuch as Policy 3 may be applicable to the project,the project entails the renovation and landward expansion of a presently existing, worn building not readily visible from any public viewshed. Therefore,neither visual quality nor scenic resources will be affected by the project,and the project will be consistent with Policy 3. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III-Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑Yes n No ® Not Applicable The property and bluff are currently protected from flooding and erosion by the existing retaining wall at the base of the bluff,and the project does not address that structure or any other erosion control initiatives. Policy 4 is not applicable to the project. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III -Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria IX Yes No Not Applicable All new construction shall be located landward of the preexisting crest of bluff setback and more than 100 feet from wetlands. To ensure consistency with Policy 5,a row of staked haybales and project limiting fence will be installed landward of the crest of bluff to contain site disturbance during construction;a drainage system of drywells will be installed to capture and recharge roof runoff from new dwelling;and an upgraded sanitary system will be installed to provide proper treatment of on-site septic waste. The site plan incorporating these protective mitigation measures has been granted a Town Wetlands Permit by the Board of Trustees,a wastewater management permit by the Suffolk County Department Health Services, and been exempted from New York State Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations by the NYS DEC. The project will therefore be consistent with Policy 5. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III -Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes Ti No 7 Not Applicable The project will be consistent with Poli, as it will not create any new clearing or site i_ ,bance or stage any new construction closer to the crest of bluff or tidal waters than the existing structure to be renovated and expanded upward and landward. Moreover,temporary and permanent ecosystem protection will be provided via the measures outlined in Policy 5(see above). No wetlands or other natural resources will be affected by the project,and the Board of Trustees have determined through their issuance of a Town Wetlands Permit that the project complies with their statutory and regulatory requirements. The NYS DEC has exempted the project from the State's Wetlands Laws. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. n Yes 111 No XI Not Applicable The project will neither affect nor have an impact on air quality in the Town of Southold, Policy 7 is not applicable to the project. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. Yes No ® Not Applicable The project will neither create nor require the handling of solid waste or hazardous substances. Policy 8 is not applicable to the project. PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Ft Yes No PI Not Applicable As the project area is limited to the portion of the property located landward of the crest of bluff(with elevation exceeding 60'MSL), public access to and recreational use of the adjacent coastal waters and public lands and resources will not be affected by the project. Policy 9 is not applicable to the project. Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's er-dependent uses and promote siiL.,__ of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. n Yes No Not Applicable The project neither proposes nor affects water-dependent uses. Policy 10 is not applicable to the project. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No® Not Applicable The project neither proposes nor affects commercial or recreational fisheries or other uses associated with the living marine resources of Long Island Sound. Policy 11 is not applicable to the project. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable The project site is neither situated on nor adjacent to agricultural lands. Policy 12 is not applicable to the project. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes n No Not Applicable The project affects neither the use nor development of energy and mineral resources. Policy 13 is not applicable to the project. PREPARED BY ``� TITLE COASTAL MGMT SPECIALIST DATEMay 4,2007 ROB ' .HERRMANN Amended on 8/1/05 �OFFOj,r�; Office Location: ��ht.\O OG- Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) 0 P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 119711 . ��o e' Southold,NY 11971-0959 d http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax(631) 765-9064 May 8, 2007 Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold, NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 6033 (Landau) Dear Mark: Enclosed is an amended LWRP form prepared on behalf of the applicant to reflect revised information on the 2007 plans, drawing marked T-lb dated 5/307 and attorney's cover letter dated May 7, 2007. Thank you. Very truly yours, JAMES DINIZIO, JR. By: Enclosures (3) OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Office Location: NFB Building, First Floor, 54375 Main Road at Youngs Avenue Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork.net emails: Linda.Kowalskina,Town.Southold.ny.us or Jayne.Martin(a,Town.Southold.nv.us (631) 765-1809 (ext. 5011 during recording) fax (631) 765-9064 o 3, TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: O,0` FROM: DATE: /AI /2eo 7 RE: 1,0 / c 9 /07 Agenda (or 4Z.6 0,3'3 MESSAGE: �) Correspondence or related attached regarding the above for your information, • Thank you. Pages attached: J . 454,\,0 � P CID , Au-) i)aiv- poi Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Rd.,P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 RE: Application of Landau, 855 Soundview Avenue,Mattituck Dear Zoning Board Members: //we reside at .57e) 5,0me,P/Le-4) which is located '.€41-s-s the 5 1r-of Adrienne Landau's property. We are familiar with Ms. Landau's plans to reconstruct her home, and we wanted to express our support for her application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Very truly yours, 7 - Mc i /c o`1 2oit & tocut.4 ' ,S-3O1 1--Acts,,;) /2-66.1 urn 5o , 01c , I l WI hlic4i 1.04,44_44 y cfov 1Ait2-w r `Deo" 2-014 i wJ 404 ¢-wt.l-ost.vx rJ .J` 305-5 g,. k a Cs lar 1 o• S Ivo�,o -dJ w 1N 1�1s - wsicheQ ins2 kb-.AAA. 4-1/43c12-,o1.04 417 .e/NA e v%5 I'esdiAck 4 Apia 4v,)tamu'feq9w6Ld -A 41 k • J , I ' r -'t , • 1 3- • • ' i r . •. ¢ . F t ,z� s -_ i r. .i - t r • v. ' ,b , y • ' e • t $• • 1 -I • ' \ I • • e 1 4 • , \ i . , u - V , ). Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Rd.,P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 RE: Application of Landau, 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck Dear Zoning Board Members: j�� ..ems / Uwe r side at (4.0 Qyvhich is located U ell, to the ' of Adrienne Landau s proper yC' . We are familiar with Ms. Landau's plans to reconstruct her home, and we wanted to express our support for her application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Very truly yours, sc)- V� J ) LJo7 Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Rd., P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 V RE: Application of Landau, 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck. Dear Zoning Board Members: I/we reside at Goy 5r'u.(nci ) auo ,which is located Y-CSkfi to the 1-42-st—of Adrienne Landau's property. We are familiar with Ms. Landau's plans to reconstruct her home, and we wanted to express our support for her application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Very truly yours, Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Rd.,P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 RE: Application of Landau, 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattrtuck '// ?/O 7 Dear Zoning Board Members: Uwe reside at L1t n`i� DS� ` 00.419 ,which is located Gl to the 'L') 6 S i of Adrienne Landau's property. We are familiar with Ms. Landau's plans to reconstruct her home, and we wanted to express our support for her application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Very truly yours, ~ a / 1 , , 442 / , , 4 PO Box 427 250 Lloyds Lane Mattituck,NY 11952 Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Rd.,PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 June 1, 2007 Re: Application of Landau 855 Soundview Ave.,Mattituck Dear Zoning Bd. Members, We are neighbors of Adrienne Landau and have reviewed her plans for home improvement. We would like to support her application as this improvement will be in the character of the neighborhood. Sincerely, Atz;46)142 Doris and Ron McGreevy 65 Soundview Ave. Mattituck,NY 11952 Zoning Board of Appeals 53095 Main Rd.,PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 June 1, 2007 Re: Application of Landau 855 Soundview Ave.,Mattituck Dear Zoning Bd. Members, We reside at 65 Soundview Ave. which is west of the Landau property. We are familiar with Ms. Landau's plans to reconstruct her home and we want to support her application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Very truly yours, and Louise apellino es o NOTICE OF HEARING The following application will be heard by the Southold Town Board of Appeals at Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold: FAME : Landau , A. #6033 MAP # : 94- 1 -7 APPEAL : Bluff Setback Variance REQUEST: Additions/Alterations -ft2„) V4--- DATE : THURSDAY, -- 0 : 25 AM If you are interested in this project, you ma - review the file(s) prior to the hearing during normal business days between 8 AM and 3 PM . TONING BOARD-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 765- 1809 ,SIF if' Office Location: O. t �� Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank % y 2 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) % P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 y,�01 apl� � Southold,NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 June 19, 2007 Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 6033 (Landau) Dear Mark: Enclosed is an amended survey updated June 1, 2007 to show a revised sediment and erosion control plan for this project. Please feel free to comment on this plan prior to our hearing to be held on June 28, 2007. Thank you. Very truly yours, JAMES DINIZIO, JR. By: Enclosures (3) ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAILING ADDRESS and PLACE OF HEARINGS: 53095 Main Road, Town Hall Building, P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 (631) 765-1809 Fax 765-9064 LOCATION OF ZBA OFFICE: Town Hall Annex at North Fork Bank Building, 1st Floor 54375 Main Road and Youngs Avenue, Southold website: http://southtown.northfork.net June 5, 2007 Re: Town Code Chapter 55 — Public Notices for Thursday, June 28, 2007 Hearing Dear Sir or Madam: Please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing your recent application. The Notice will be published in the next issue of the Times Review newspaper. 1) Before June 11th: Please send the enclosed Legal Notice, with both a Cover Letter including your telephone number and a copy of your Survey or Site Plan (filed with this application) which shows the new construction area or other request, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, to all owners of property (tax map with property numbers enclosed), vacant or improved, which abuts and any property which is across from any public or private street. Use the current owner name and addresses shown on the assessment rolls maintained by the Town Assessors' Office located at Southold Town Hall, or Real Property Office at the County Center, Riverhead. If you know of another address for a neighbor, you may want to send the notice to that address as well. If any letter is returned to you undeliverable, you are requested to make other attempts to obtain a mailing address or to deliver the letter to the current owner, to the best of your ability, and to confirm how arrangements were made in either a written statement, or during the hearinq, providing the returned letter to us as soon as possible; AND not later than June 12th: please either mail or deliver to our office your Affidavit of Mailing (form enclosed) with parcel numbers, names and addresses noted, and furnish it to our office with the white receipts postmarked by the Post Office. When the green signature cards are returned to you by the Post Office, please mail or deliver them to us before the scheduled hearing. If any signature card is not returned, please advise the Board during the hearing and provide the card (when available). These will be kept in the permanent record as proof of all Notices. th / 2) Not Later June 18th, please make arrangements to place the enclosed Poster on a signboard such as cardboard, plywood or other material, posting it at your property for seve (7) days (or more) until the hearing is held. Securely place the sign on your property faci the street, no more than 10 feet from the front property line bordering the street. If you bora more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is available for the additional front yard. PIe/ deliver your Affidavit of Posting during the meeting. / If you are not able to meet the deadlines stated in this letter, please contact us promptly. you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Zoning Appeals Board and Staff Ends. ,A f_ii,.ralviii .ja4-: - -r(:•iiv: ,norsouthoid ZBA ' CLIAPP.--Nariie''' biax Má f-: -b File No. 1- F4 IISEQRA [ tOir'd---Member' 'Gerard P. GOehringer ,;- I 0-Unliste ! Search: , , , -i-r—i , Hearing Time. -- -- 950 AM I-1-Other ,I File Number.FET1 Tax-kmap•194-1-7 .. . .... .. LApp. Name: LANDAU, Adrien4 j; I LC 4/19/07 li ,1 Hamlet, )Mattituck ,Type Residential ; Zone. III:4d----- Status Jew Actionli -1---- ......., LOcation2,1855 Soundview Ave. 11 SI I ;Short - Additions/alterations - bluff setback 18.5' instead of Desc. _ 100', 280-116.A(I) : H copy likl 1 i II-4 - . ,' ., Prior ZBA 3691 (1987/1988)Pool denied on bluff Notes!, side, CA frnt Yd; S &W&LWRP &CO PL pending. Need to send Trustees memo ref current bluff line. - ! (teceived.s.urveys_518/...Q11:_as_of_5/...17/07.ID I ; : ; i [[,5/ 0/4p7-1 9;30,All'i[LAPS'-,[NUM J_'' .. ' , :2._-,,,:,,:•:, ___RevcOpdd by the$ajiiipld,T*-ripaia Proce'siri9,PepOrtri264,1 yam. OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Mailing Address: 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 Office Location: Town Annex-NFB Building, 54375 Main Road at Youngs Avenue Southold, NY 11971-0959 Emails: Linda.Kowalski(a_Town.Southold.nv.us Jayne.Martin(d Town.Southold.nv.us http://southoldtown.northfork.net (631) 765-1809 fax(631) 765-9064 REPLY FORM DATE: )fes a,0W 7 �/� TO: Q' �(� T"a k cet ,- Fax# 3 4 9--02-4 P ZBA File# (0.033 - - f QLiidap ,,) Q9 d-71 Date of Building Inspector Notice of Disapproval: ,, liju�f_ (Ap..41ALLA.1) ( ) The application is incomplete for the reasons noted below. Please furnish seven (7) sets o following: ( ) Please furnish seven (7) sets of the following (within about 7 days, if possible in order flu application can be advertised for the public hearing calendar date of : ). advertising deadline is 22 days before the meeting date. You may forward the information by 765-9064, however,please send the original and six sets by mail or by hand. Thank you. ( The map submitted does not match the information on the Building Inspector's Not Disapproval. Please submit the amendments dated //ate../p 7 directly to the Building Depar for review, and if an amended Notice of Disapproval is issued, please furnish seven (7) copies cover letter confirming that the amended relief that is being added or revised in your requ variance(s). Thank you. Missing information: 0.0D?r ) OTHER/INFORMATION REQUESTED ets with cover/transmittal sheet wh- submitting): ( ) Filing fee is$ ; Amount due at this time(please mail): (Amount paid was: (y). Available survey showing existing property/building details,with licensed surveyor inforq ( ) Architectural map or updated survey showing dimensions of existing and propos construction areas,setbacks to property lines, and building lot coverage calculations. ( ) Rough diagram or sketch with building height data (#of stories and distance from grou of ridge (and mean height, if known); ( ) elevation from all sides; ( ) landscaping i construction. ( ) - Letter confirming status and date of review by other involved agencies for presubmission commen of up-to-date agency action. ( ) Updated single-and-separate search dated back to April 23, 1957 (Zoning Section 100-23D-4), an deeds dating back to creation of original lot lines for this property. ( ,1.) &u�.te. fah-Z11- 4 �hea�o Ir frt.01_, /1-1-c1-60 I 6°) LW/Z P . • .' A (ts„, g L,L) p ,art ?ail Thank you. 0 go" i �,e' SufFO((= I001 OFFO(�_= Office Location: COG e�� ��� Mailing Address: xt tip Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank -y _ 53095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) 0 P.O.P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 y�Ol Atoo./ Southold,NY 11971-0959%r http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax(631)765-9064 April 23, 2007 Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall Annex Southold,NY 11971 Re: ZBA File Ref. No. 6033 (Landau) Dear Mark: We have received an application for additions and alterations to a residence on Long Island Sound in Mattituck and shown on the enclosed site map. Copies of the LWRP form and area map are also attached for your use and reference. May we ask for your assistance in an evaluation and recommendations for this proposal. Thank you. Very truly yours, JAMES DINIZIO, JR. By: _„ ��, FOL4. Office Location: � ®d OS Mailing Address: Town Annex/First Floor,North Fork Bank 453095 Main Road 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) �'�� P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 *‘9.1 " „®- / Southold,NY 11971-0959 ® http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax(631) 765-9064 April 23, 2007 Mr. Thomas Isles, Director Suffolk County Department of Planning P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Mr. Isles: Please find enclosed the following application with related documents for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code: Appl. No. 6033 (Landau) Action Requested: Bluff Variance Within 500 feet of: ( ) State or County Road ( x ) Waterway (Bay, Sound, or Estuary) ( ) Boundary of Existing or Proposed County, State, Federal land. If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, James Dinizio, Jr., Chairman By: Enclosures NUTICEO - HEARING ,, \ \ i The following application will be heard by the Southold Town � Board of Appeals at Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold: NAME : Landau , A. #6033 MAP # : 94- 1 -7 APPEAL : Bluff Setback Variance REQUEST: )Y,,) ansmid-16 /0 6 „ ,1,( ,' ,3) DATE : THURSDAY, May 31 , If you are interested in this project, you may review the file(s) prior to the hearing during normal business days between 8 AM and 3 PM . BONING BOARD-TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 765-1809 rae,: ,; Sootliold Town Board of Appeals ‘ -,0,„,�" `` ,, �' MAIN READ- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. U971 TELEPHONE,(516)765-1899 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3691 Application Dated Novembe'r•6, 1987 TO: 'Mr. Hospy Selim [Appellant(s)] 671 Vandam Street North Woodmere-, NY 11581 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on January 14, 1988, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [X] Request for Variance5to the-Zoning Ordinance • Article XI., Section 100-119.2 and Article., III , Section 100-31 [ ] Request for' Application of HOSNY SELIM for a Variance -to. the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article III, Section 100-32 and Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to locate inground swimmingpool •with decks and- fence enclosure landward of existing dwelling in the front yard and within 100 feet of the Long Island Sound, at premises known as 855 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 94, Block 01 , Lot 07. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and condluded on Decem- ber 10, 1987 in the Matter of the Application of HOSNY SELIM under Appl . No. 3681 ; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and ' WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1 . The premises in question is a described parcel of land containing a total area of approximately 40 ,000 sq. ft. with 100.55 ft. frontage along the north side of Sound View Avenue at Mattituck, and more particularly known and identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 94, Block 1 , , Lot 7. 2. The subject premises is located in the "A-40" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District and is improved with a single- family dwelling with setbacks as shown by the 0dtober 1 , 1983 survey map prepared by Donack Associates (at 55 feet from the existing bulkhead at its closest point). (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: January 14, 1988. CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) ; s Page 2 - Appl . No. 3691 Matter of HOSNY SELIM Decision Rendered January 14, 1988 3. By this application, the appellant requests a-Variance" from the Provisions of: (a) Article XI, Section 100-119.2 and (b) Article III, Section 100-32 for permission to locate inground swimmingpool with decks and fence enclosure in the frontyard area at more than 100 feet •from the front property line along Sound View Avenue. 4. Article XI, Section 100-119.2, subparagraph A[1] requires all buildings proposed on'lots adjacent to the Long Islapd Sound to be set back not less than one-hundred (100).-feet from the " ordinary highwater mark and not less- than one-hundred, (100) feet from the top of the bluff, or bank. 5. Article III, Section 100-32 of the Zoning Code requires accessory structures" ,to 'be located"in the' rearyard area. For the record, it is rioted that Article III, Section 100_-31 of the Zoning Code permits additions or attachments to a principal dwelling in the frontyar'd area provided that the, frontyard setback is not less than 50 feet (Column A-40)., 6. For the record i't is also noted that a Building Permit under Appl . No: 15783Z issued March 21 , 1987 is pending .at this time. 7. On-site inspections find as follows: (a) the existing construction is set back 21± feet from the-top of bluff and 55± feet from the highwater mark along the Long Island Sound; (b) the area of the proposed pool construction is in a depression (low area) of the lot. Along the east side of the depression, the land gently rises and then lowers into a drainageway sloping onto the adjoining easterly lot. 8. In considering this appeal, the Board also finds and determines that the placement of the inground pool , either as an accessory structure or as an addition to the existing dwelling: (a) is not unreasonable and will not create a substantial change in the character of the area; (b) the circumstances are unique; (c) the construction as proposed is landward of existing building[s] and would not; be detri- mental to the bluff or L.I. Sound areas; (d) there is no other method feasible for appellants to pursue otther than a variance; (e) the practical difficulties claimed are suffi- cient to warrant the relief, as alternatively granted -below; (f) in view of all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting an alternative, location, in the frontyard area, as noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringe-r, seconded by Mr. Sawicki , it was RESOLVED, to DENY the location as requested of the inground pool with decks and fence -enclosure, and it was further RESOLVED, to GRANT the 'construction of a 20' by 40' inground pool with decks and fence enclosure in the Matter ' I Page 3 Appl . No. 3691 Matter of HOSNY SELIM Decision Rendered January 14, 1988 of the Application of HOSNY SELIM under Appl. No. 3691, in the frontyard area, PROVIDED THE POOL: 1 . Be situated in a north-south direction, rather than the requested east-west direction; 2. Be located closer to the easterly side property line with a setback at not less than 15 feet from the east line and not less than 36 feet from the westerly side property line; 3. That the actual -pool construction be not closer than 36 feet to the west property line; the actual deck and fence construction be •not closer than 30 feet to ,the westerly property line; 4. That the proposed construction remain unroofed (as proposed) ; 5. Sufficient evergreen screening be placed and maintained on both sides of the proposed construction (with minimum three-ft. high evergreens , six foot apart, for the full distance; 6. That there be no overhead or adverse lighting in the - yard areas; 7. That house lighting, if any, be shielded to the property. 8. Proper measures to be taken to insure that final eleva- tions and grades will not result in storm-water surface runoff flowing onto adjoining property or off-site. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, and Sawicki . (Members Doyen and Douglass were absent due to illnesses'. ) This resolution was duly adopted. 1 k a � s� 417. � '�� �` GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN January 29, 1988 .sl i'2;M:'ig J - 1' h fid-' ''174 ¢ k''i ''4 ;r i'i ..' ' {'Il . to^- ;IS : 5 1- ' i sO ti 6 U p / -v. y- $p S• •gJJ{��£ *dl 1',o-�` 1 i 03�ME v'_ . MAP OF • N 68 pt 93 �� o DESCRIBED PROPERTY '2 • '-...-• ,.‘ . ...— AT MATT/TUCK • s SUFFOLK CO, NY. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD / ?~ N.Y. / T 4. / ,/ :i / 47 4 NOWof[r,l k*:''� � Z v/ fi T • ry S t *. j VA -4. Q.` S 2.1 D-'-"" � - LC. `.LST A' m' 1"j1 •M\ .I c� \\,,.. -\ \ ,, I°a'OA'E • o la t^° �, v 0-56 E NO A �•v+ PJ 5l 66+ . •00561' `�� 4. ' N S 0 U N 0 CERT/RED TD= THE 7/TLE 604RANTEE Q7. o a- r/263-3/65 1 ✓OESPN K: GLUM 8 ✓AOUEL/NE Ai UK; t V rt6 9 - 1 donack associates • �R43B land surveyors and �, 'a.�? 4°W ozw '1,9..1.• .gy P consulting engineers n .Sod° DN9ck - 313 west main street l n *- _ '_ riverhead,new York 11901 (516)369-1717 (212) 746-3020 Rl • • H0.392P," AR E,4 3B,B44v •PeoLANDs‘r Oct.I ,1983 Job Ns 83-337 08S/;41'8Es 1000-094-01-07 Seale.I°=401 V a ,_-1 (-----• A i '5— `.. NOTICE OF HEARINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the . Town Law and the Code of the Town of Southold, the following hearings will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS; at a Regular Meeting at the Southold Town Hall , Main Road, - Southold, New York, on 'THURSDAY, DECEMBER 10; 1987 at the following times: 7:30 p.m. Appl . No. 3566 = THEODOSE TRATAROS and ERAKLIS APODIACOS. Variance to the Zoning, Ordinance, ;Arti.cle III, • Section 100-31 , Bulk Schedule, for approval of insufficient - lot area of proposed Parcel #1 in this pending set-off division of land located along the south side •of the Main - Road, and. extending along the east side of Wiggins Lane, . Greenport, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 35, Block 5, Lot 3, containing a total area of 3.262 acres. 7:35 p.m. Appl . No. 3694 - THERESA CZECH. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100=31 ,Bulk Schedule, for approval of the construction of open deck with an insufficient rearyard setback from the east property • line at premises known as 150 Goldin Lane, Southold, NY; • County Tax Map District 1000, Section 135, 'block 2 , Lot 19. 7:40 p.m. Appl . No. 3695 - 'HENRY J. SMITH & SON. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VIII, Section 100-80(B) for permission to construct truck-storage building in this "C-Light inaustrial" Zoning District at premises •known as 2740 Peconic Lane, Peconic, 1V11; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 74, Block 2, Lot 19.1 . 7:45 p.m. Appl . No. 3689 - PETER AND 'DIANE' LUHRS. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article VII , Section 100-70(B) for permission to construct addition for a repair station in conjunction with Special Exception , Permit #3161 rendered October 11 , 1983, at premises known as 45845 North Road, Southold, NY; County Tax. Map District 1000, Section 55, Block 02, Lot 17. Zone District: "B-1 ." 7:50 p.m. Appl . Na. 3691 - HOSNY SELIM. Variance toj the Zoning Ordinance, Article III , Section 100-32 and • . m } Page 2 - Notice of 1•,eari ngs ..I Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting - December 10, 1987 ` ( Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to locate inground swimmingpool with decks and fence enclosure landward of existing dwelling in the front yard and within T00 feet of the Long Island Sound, at premises known as 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 94, Block 01 , Lot 07. 8:05 p.m. Appl . No. 3696 - RICHARD NASS. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for per- mission to locate open wooden deck with a setback of less than 75 feet from existing bulkhead along canal , at premises known as 50 Willow Point Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map District 1000,• Section 56, Block 5, Lot 25.. 8:10 p.m. Appl . No. 3676 - ANTHONY ROBUSTELLI . Variances _ to the Zoning Ordinance, Articles : (a) III , Section 100-31 •, as to insufficient rear yard and side yard, and (b) XI, Section 100-119.2 as to insufficient setback from bulkhead and ordinary highwater mark, dnd (c ) III , •Section 100-31 as to excessive lot coverage, for the proposed construction _ . . of a deck addition, at premises known as 5 Haywaters Road, Cutchogue, NY; Lot 23 and part of 22, Peconic Bay Properties; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 111 , Block 1 , Lots 19 and 18. Y` 8:15 p.m. Appl . No. 3671 - ANDRE ANA THOMAS CYBULSKI. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III , Section 100-30A for permission to utilize premises for book-publishing operations, wholesale book storage, and updated 280-A approval over the existing private right-of-way for such use. Zone District: "A" Residential and Agricultural . Location -of Property: West Side Depot Lane, Cutchogue , NY; District 1000, Section 96, Block 5, Lot 1 .2 and ,part of 1 .1 . 8:25 p.m. Appl . No. 3543 - PETER AND BARBARA HERZ. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to locate new single-family dwelling with insufficient setbacks from existing bulk- . head and from highwater areas along Midway Inlet and Hog Neck Bay, premises known as 70 Cedar Point Drive, Southold, NY; Cedar Beach Park Map, Part of Lots 152 and 110, County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-90-02-13.1 . , • i 1 Page 3 - Notice of• Hearings Southold Town Board of Appeals Regular Meeting - December 10, 1987 8:40 p.m. Appl. No. 3561 - DOROTHY L. ROBERTSON. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 , Bulk Schedule, for approval of the insufficient lot area of two proposed parcels in this pending set-off division of land with frontage along the south side of North View Drive, the east side of Private Road and the north side of South View Drive, Orient, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 13, Block 1 , Lot 10. 8:55 plm. Appl. No. '3686 - FREDERICK AND DIANE RAYMES. Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Articles: (a) XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to locate dwelling with a •setback of less than 75 feet from existing bulkhead along Gull Pond Inlet, (b) III, Section 100-31 , for permission to locate dwelling with an insufficient frontyard setback, at premises known as 704 Wiggins Lane, Greenport, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 35, Block 4, Lot 19. The Board of Appeals will hear at said time and place all persons or representatives desiring to be heard in each of the above matters. Each hearing will not start before the time allotted. Written comments may be submitted prior to the conclusion of the subject hearing. .For more informa- tion, please call 765-1809. Dated: November 18, 1987. BY ORDER OF TI-% SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD-OF APPEALS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN Linda Kowalski, Board Secretary x I ' i' 1' rTh FORM NO.3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL File No. Date © a , 19 • To :.,. ..... �. 2 5'S as,,,, oQ?).Z...) ' cogza,t1 )01. I ►, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated Q'6-Q'`2•4• a°1 , 19.4 . for permit to construct as 0.c V �G -C`� -�- � at Location of Property 2 5 S 3 s-�x..9-0 "_. • � '-L House Na. '{ Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section - ocl Block ©A Lot ...41 Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot No. , is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds. c--n .{} c.ra-ITY'l I 613-32 ` (� � (. ‘,:;:4,1&.;:,L-11)uv'-o 9 i -. x a'a4 CA... Building Inspector HV 1/a0 • - . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK �, C� APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUILDING IN APPEAL NO. 3 " r ! NOV 0 as- DATE Nov x,1987 TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,TQ�SVARLD,'N. Y. • 1, (We) —130S= SEISM of ..671. Al DM "S',L'i 1 Name of Appellont Street and Number N.Y.2:15$.1..HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON ARLICATION FOR PERMIT NO. DATED' Oct. 29,1987 WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO Name of Applicant for permit of 85 Soundview Ave Mattituck N.Y. Street and Number Municipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY (X) Permit to construct an accessory swimming pool and fence. 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY .85.s Soundview Ave Street /Hamlet f Use District on Zoning Map District 1000 Section 0914-Block OlLot07 Current Owner liosny Selim Map No. Lot No. Prior OwnerJoseph&Jacqueline GUIDO 2. PROVISION (5) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED lIndicate the Article Section, Sub- section and Paragraph of the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article -LI Section 100-32 y• 3. TYPE OF APPEAL Appeal is made herewith for (please check appropriate box) (>)- A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 • 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal (has) (has not) been made with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for o variance and was made in Appeal No. Dated REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 (X) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) is requested for the reason that Article III Section 100-32, Accessory permitted in rear yard only. Action required by zoning board of appeals. Article XI Section 119.2,constructing within 100' of bluff. Variance needed. Form zsi (Continue on other side) 1 i U.4 -...�'`41449.I ZaRI)f t!t uBtT•ISSi� REASON FOR APPEAL - Continued • 1AW 1 STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORD A CE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because Accessory couldn't ponstructed in rear yard as it is located between the existing house and the buff 2. The hardship created is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in this use district because House is close to the bluff. 3. The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance arid WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because Front yard is over 2.76long. Neither the existing house nor the proposed accessory will be visible from the main road (Soundview Are). STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss /1/S10 - COUNTY OF Signature Sworn to this LPL day of. .741ite-l4441-' 19 e7 Notary Public LINDA WF-1313213 Notary Public,State of New Volt No 2447675E8 Qualified In/Saga Comfy_ 04-vor camrill641"Ex*"71/4r3l, (`'` � � - ( BOARD OF HEAL K `- 3 SETS OF PLANS 4' ')110 :wu: �••••,;!'/$'1,1 'FORM NO.1 SURVEY / :I t C 4 MAR I T i{ • I TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CHECK i itBUILDING DEPARTMENT SEPTIC FORM • i; ..� _.. _-•�-�^� TOWN HALL nui tiEpT. NOTIFY t, `T0v.N O SOD-MOLD i, SOUTHOLD,N.Y. 11971 • "' , TEL.:765-1802 CALL MAIL TO: Examined ?:•)..., 19;.1 Approved : �.:'.,14��.PermitNo 5 ���� ek & ��� �f Disapproved a/c Y4-. 0 . --Ay-\\ii ' • . , \Cc-de.-�j1 (Building Inspector) ' • APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT f Date • .�/ /'7 , 19'x• - . e INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector,with 3 'sets of plans,accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas,and giving a detailed description of Iayout of property must•be drawn on the diagram which is part of this appli- cation. c.. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. �'1 d. Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit ', shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy j.,. ;shall have been granted by the Building Inspector. ` ' APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the ;ter +Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York, and other applicable Laws,Ordinances or :1•i• c•i 1 Regulations, for the'construction of buildings,additions or alterations,or for removal or demolition,as herein described. e;i,,The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws,ordinances, bu'I,' ;: code,housing code,and regulations,and to I admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary insp 1 ns. ' :.„ (Sit, ature of applicant,or name,if a corporation) t :i;/ ii j d /l'? D orha4 .I1.r /14.4 1 7'C.. P41).:, , ' (Mailing address 6f applicant) //7J.--0— ;; 1'4 , �, ," ; fate whether applicant is,owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder. •,..i I i-'• i:' Nine of owner of premises i/e S Iv V s f ; rfl:,, (as on the tax roll or latest deed) :;'• s If applicant is a corporation,signature of duly authorized officer. ' (Name and title of corporate officer) • a"i -, , 1'1'' ;.;Ali-L CONTRACTOR'S MUST BE SUFFOLK COUNTY LICENSED ' '!1• ' ' ,Builder's License No. /./.647-r—.(7.1•T ,<,i, :Plumber's License No. •i ; • ,` '.Electrician's License No. • 4 i';, :;Other Trade's License No. e S-S' I i•',T'ovation of land on which proposed•woric will be done. pp ;`i51 I 'P House Number Street Hamlet ;;„'q;t P Ctounty Tax Map No. 1000 Section 7 1 Block i I Lot r) 4l' ibdivision ' Filed Map No. Lot Jill' l,'li (Name) siiIIIINtate existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupiincy of proposed construction: iiN ,A1,. ig Existing use and opcupancy a 'L F ,1 .e_L i,i .. .. I.ii 1 I p.Intended use and occupy 's /`'`-S.._ ‹.„,„.a. , c 6'i "'—• i 3., work(check which applicable,.....w Building Addition ...,h Alteration j Xeyair Removal Demolition Other Work ? to 54 v (Description) / , / 4. Estimated Cost // Fee (to be paid on filing this application) J1 5. If dwelling,number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor .: If garage,number of cars - — 6. If business,commercial or mixed occupancy,specify nature and extent of each type of use 7. Dimensions of existing structures,if any: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions:Front Rear •Depth Height Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction:Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 9. Size of lot:Front Rear Depth 10. Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law,ordinance or regulation: - 13. Will lot be regraded Will excess fill be removed from premises: Yes No 14. Name of Owner of premises Address Phone No. Name of Architect Address Phone No. Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15. Is this property located within 300 feet of a tidal wetland?:*Yes No *If yes, Southold Town Trustees Permit may be required. PLOT DIAGRAM Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and,indicate all set-back dimensions from property lines.Give street and block number or description according to deed,and;show street names and indicate whether interior or corner lot. 2 • 11 • • t 3TAT1?P,-OZ'rtNEW YORK, S.S :OUI i.` ' i , r.-i;•.�•1.', :- being duly sworn,deposes and says that he is the applicant i i, ;; 0ne of individual signing contract); -'a above(yatne ! r , t _ ie is t4e.,1 -;l�i �,,:tA €.l: ti' (Contractor,agent,corporate officer,etc.) '' )f sai ,.. 1 owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this ipplic Fj,)all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that the vorkf -:::.:11,..;,'G.rmed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. ;wor •- • e this „ i 1 '4; j�iit'�/7 day of��7G , 1917 1 ;ota i} ,, !/�� County '' 1lia: f1EidRDE 11f .., 1ek?` l?ii.,,; - RIMY PUMA Ststa of Nowa (Signature of applicant) Ha.47117878,&oast Collar ' Term£xpres Much 30,a° ,7 • :1"1"1111111111"""111.1"11"111"11 '?rJon tj •p'[1i i t 14►11040 ie riglIWOMPSIXeitLek K•oihrrlii*rvtrsuxyxeireffe.rmitir ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Signature Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Pt. A.- t illPrint your name and address on the reverse X,'72€_1? e ^. •-• gasses so that we can return the card to you. g, Ceived (Printed Name) Wteig�elivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, /,!/7 or on the-front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1 0 Yes If YES,enter delivery address below: 0 No Paul C.,),Aatthews Kate V. Hatthews « ano. 111 Livingston St., Suite 1110 Brooklyn, NY 11201 3. Service Type ®Certified Mall 0 Express Mall 0 Registered XX Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mall 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7005 0 3 9 0 0001 918 8 1666 PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 1o2ss5-o2-M-1540 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail 11 Postage&Fees Paid USPS Permit No.G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGJE P.O.BOX 279 4,\'j,RIVERHEAD, NEWYORK 11dcWtu 79 � k. ' b 200? A }33 ((+ ii jJ it( _} i,, gl}E .v�: i�f n►�r�r l x.�rt•�►•-WKi]ul9g*IW lgvi ettem iT-Dmrlul r • Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Sign 'ure item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. Agent MI Print your name and address on the reverse �/ 1� ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. ,IVI d by(Prin %Name) f CA Date of Delivery • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ,4111 or on the front if space permits. ,,,,c-:P17471 .1. O S 7: every a•. 4.•—kwftfferent from item 1? 0 Yes 1. Article Addressed to: f S,enter de address below: 0 No N Lynn Rossinik Uro�,2p0, � 755 Soundview Avenue ifiattituck, NY 11952 3. Service 51 Certified Mall 0 Express Mail Q Registered XX Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) 0 Yes • 2. Article Number - - -- - - iibel , 7005 0390:000:1 918 8, , ( ansferfrom service la1 j 3 5 PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-ClassMail • Posta USPSge&Fees Paid {I - �e� it too G-10 Cj ( '_ • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • JUN ®8 ay/ ESSS,rS ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL P.O.BOX 279 RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901-0279 C Ill11h1111 I Jt�nFlIIIfl ti���du�1IITn`Ietl�aOeul���1 ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Sig _///101 item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. j 47 , 0 Agent NI Print your name and address on the reverse X ; 0 Addressee sot thatchthiswcan return the the card toh you. p g, O�av9d,b rinntdtram C�. e 61ivery • Attach card to back of the mail iece, r (� y � fi'G-� T T or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from item 1' 0 es 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: 0 No Ronald.Stritzler Personal Residence Trust I 51 Stirrup Lane Roslyn Heights, NY 11577 3. Service Type III Certified Mall 0 Express Mail 0 Registered IN Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mall 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7005 0390 0001 918 8 1642 PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 UNITEb STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail 111111 Postage&Fees Paid USPS Permit No.G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • ESSEKS, HEFTER &i4NGELd1:4-A-4-1 6,,. I P.O.BOX 279 RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901-0279 JUN 142 / iIII`ilI11111iIIIllIIIII11111IIIIii111,111111111i1111111IiiI11 , 1 ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL, LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. 0. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (631)369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA,Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER (631)369-2065 P. o. Box 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 CARMELA M. DI TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK THEODORE D. SKLAR p NANCY SILVERMAN June 18, 2007 LISA J. Ross MELISSA H SIDOR Linda Kowalski Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals PO Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Re: Application of Adrienne Landau ZBA File No. 6033 Premises: 855 Soundview Avenue Mattituck, New York SCTM No.: 1000-094.00-01.00-007.000 Dear Ms. Kowalski: Enclosed please find an additional Affidavit of Mailing for parcel No. 1000-100.00- 02.00-001.000, together with a copy of the cover letter which was re-sent on June 12`h. The original mailing was returned to our office as "undeliverable"to the address provided by Suffolk County. A subsequent search of the Assessor's Office provided the address listed on the attached sheet. Additionally, enclosed please find all three (3) return receipt cards for your file. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Ver40,t, yours, • Ant ony C. Pasca /bw , Enclosures ' ' 4 w a ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL, LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P 0. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (631)369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER(631)369-2065 P 0. Box 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N.Y 11976 CARMELA M. DI TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C. PASCA NICA B. STRUNK THEODORE D. SKLAR June 12, 2007 NANCY SILVERMAN LISA J. Ross MELISSA H SIDOR Via Certified Mail—Return Receipt Requested Paul C. Matthews, III Kate V. Matthews, and ano. 111 Livingston Street, St. 1110 Brooklyn, NY 11201 Re: Landau Residence 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck, New York Dear Mr. and Mrs. Matthews and ano.: Please see the enclosed legal notice and site plan for proposed construction on the Landau property at 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck,New York. If you have any questions about the application, please feel free to contact me at (631) 369-1700. Very truly yours, if Anthfiy C. Pasca /bw Enclosures } t a ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK -- X In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT Adrienne Landau OF (Name of Applicants) MAILINGS CTM Parcel #1000- 094.00 - 01.0G-007.000 X COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, David Ps Moore residing at Orient, - , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 12th day of June, 2007 , , I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Riverhead ,New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUES LLD, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown on the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the ( )Assessors, or( ) County Real Property Office , for every property which abuts and is across a public or privie street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property VII � , (Signature) David P. Moore Sworn to before me this l2th day of June l 2 ; 200 7 ELIZABETH A."oPIT'Ei S 1 doryPublic,State of►yey�yore .4811949 EiDdlotI .ary Public) Qualified ein Suffolk Couty Commission Expires Septemberer 3 3p,204 PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper the lot numbers next to the --- owner-names-and-addresses-forwhidnuti-ce ere mailed7Thank you, ------- _ -- -_- --- - a Paul C. Matthews, III Kate V. Matthews, and ano. 111 Livingston Street, St. 1110 Brooklyn,NY 11201 4 } 11,11 . Postal Se441Cep ; ' '-D (bERTIFI,ED 1T I'LTM'RSECEIPT ..n ._D JiDomesfic Marl Onl.0No Insurance Coverage Provided) "" - - - r-1 For delivery information visit our website at:www.usps.come I:0 O A L U Postage $ 58 A • i d Certified Fee 171 tReturn Receipt Fee 'D (Endorsement Required) l' �\� �N 5�' O Restricted DeliveryFee ODti , ' D-• (Endorsement Required) m CI Total Postage&Fees $ 5,3: i A 9' V-1 ' o s rr°Paui•C,, Pttthews, III & Kate Apt. ws---&--ane N. - er, Ni.;Afo o PoeoxNo. 111 Llvingston St., Suite 1110 ty,State,DP+4Brooklyn, NY 11201 PS Form 3800 June 2002 ......; ructions:. tii See Reverse for Inst U.S. Postal ServiceTM Er CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT .fid (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Cove, Provided) For delivery o ry informati+n visit our website at www.usps.come r-i ff F �yiU C _ A l_ (USE IT' Postage $ .58 1190 1-4 Certified Fee 2.65e:` 0 Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) 2 1 co ere N'. Restricted Delivery Fee / 0.. D (Endorsement Required) 4 `C/> Total Postage&Fees $ 5.38` ��/� J u'7 I= SVarBi C. Matthews III & KatteaV. Matthew. N Street,Apt.No.; a or Po Box No. 465-2 Smithtown Blvd. City,State,Z/P+4 Nesconset, NY 11767 PS Form 3800,June 2002 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service,-. • wb CERoTIFIED MAILTM RECE'T r--7 (Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Co& �a Provided) For deliveryinformation visit our website at www.usps.come co r=0 OO F [F ] C [ AL USE r7 Postage $ .580.01 pCertified Fee 2.65 t;/ , ' im k p Return Receipt Fee 2.15 c 15 re (Endorsement Required) Dom_, Delivery Fee ® A (Endorsement Required) Q• Total Postage&Fees $ CI 5.38 ��e131\'‘eatk u l _ O Se To o r'±onaid Stritzier Personal Residence r" Ttreet Apt.No.; Tru I '- orPOBox No. rte' __&tirxnp_.L ne City,state ZIP+4 Roslyn Heights, NY 11577 PS Form 3800,June 2002 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTM . ul CERTIFIED MAILTM REC '.0T .0 ,(Domestic Mail Only;No Insurance Co je.P-rovided). rl For delivery information visit our website.at'www.usps.come 03 a _ FF [ [] AL U [ Postage $ .58 CI Certified Fee 2.65 65 (bp 1 C1 � O Return Receipt Fee • r (Endorsement Required) 0- D Restricted Delivery Feer. CO N ' (Endorsement Required) • Z; D" Ill �4- Total Postage&Fees $ 5 38 0,I lr in Sent To ----*--...:,---- MI Lynn Rossini N Street,Apt.No.; or Po Box No. 755 Soundview Avenue City,State,ZIP+4 i 4attituck, NY 11952 PS Form 3800,June 2002 ,See Reverse'for Instructions• 06/05/2007 08:22 6317659064 ZBA PAGE 05 IN • ZONING BOARD OF'APPEA.LS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK X In the Matter of the Application of � AFFIDAVIT QIor (Name of Applicants) -- MAILINGS CTM Parcel ##1000- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE Oly NEW YORK) George Conklin residing at Riverhead New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 6th ,day of June, 2007,_,, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office tri, Riverhead �,Nei,,York l> > RRQLIESTEh, a true copy - , S CERT>.FIrD MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT. current owners shown othe cut-rentaassessment sLegal rolltverilenvelopes addressed to fied from the official with. the ( )Assessors, or(x) County Real Property Office Riverhead records a erye property which abuts and is across a public or privtycei street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property (Signature) Sworn to before me this George Conklin 6th day of June 2007 ELIZABETH A.ININTERS Notary Public,State of 48119,18 (Notary Public) �� olk�� PLEASE list, on tl�c back of this Affidavit or on a sheet-Expires �� ovvner-names-and-addresses-thrt hicirn-cn sect of paper the lot numbers next to the '1Fd;y'I'li2llc you. 1,• Lynn Rossini 755 Soundview Avenue Mattituck,NY 11952 1 �I 1000-094.00-01.00-006.000 Ronald Stritzler Personal Residence Trust I 51 Stirrup Lane Roslyn Heighs,NY 11577 1000-094.00-01.00-008.000 Paul C. Matthews, III Kate V. Matthews, and another 465-2 Smithtown Boulevard Nesconset,NY 11767 1000-100.00-02.00-001.000 II • L . LEGAL. NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY,JUNE 28,2007 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 280 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971-0959,on THURSDAY,JUNE 28, 2007: 10:25 a.m. ADRIENNE LANDAU (EDWARD FAGIN) #6033. Request for Variances under Sections 280-116 (formerly #100-239.4A-1), based on the Building Inspector's January 4, 2006 Notice of Disapproval,amended April 4,2007, concerning proposed new dwelling construction, after substantial demolition of existing dwelling, with setbacks less than 100 feet of the top of the bluff adjacent to the Long Island Sound,at 855 Soundview Avenue, Mattituck; CTM 94-1-7. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours and prior to the day of the hearing. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office at(631) 765-1809, or by email: Linda.Kowalski@Town.Southold.ny.us. Dated: June 4,2007. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS JAMES DINIZIO, JR., CHAIRMAN By Linda Kowalski 54375 Main Road (Office Location) 53095 Main Road (Mailing Address) P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 4) ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD : NEW YORK X In the Matter of the Application of ADRIENNE LANDAU AFFIDAVIT OF Regarding Posting of Sign upon SIGN POSTING Applicant's Land Identified as 1000-094.00-01.00-007.000 X STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss.: I, Anthony C. Pasca, Esq., a member of the firm Esseks, Hefter& Angel, LLP at 108 East Main Street, Riverhead, New York, being duly sworn, deposes and says: On the 15th day of June, 2007, I personally placed the Town's official Poster, with the date of hearing and nature of application noted thereon, securely upon the applicant's property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-way (driveway entrance)– facing the street or facing each street or right of way, near the entrance or driveway entrance to applicant's property, as the area most visible to passersby; and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven days prior to that date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be June 28, 2007. Anthon,�' . Pasca Sworn to before me this 07 day of June, 2007. CLkti4,16=i-*JL--SCI-1A)ba-----41— Lary Public ELIZABETH A.WINTERS Notary Public,State of New York No.4811949 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires September 30.2 /d 0 J - W.�x)0,'..e rtl, [s.w Fn Wr.kr u. —_[—_ NNs Norm Nv —_p—- NWFSx n N ixE1PEP`[SE. PR [RIiC1 "�f4" s...°D..N. —,„,,. ,.'..w,,„..„ —_r—_ .„::,„.er w. Fi” ,°..sm olloA.1% o P.e NOTICE "ooq COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K ° -._..- -- —PST-- FTORNI „O si W WiFNAXCE,ALIIPAiWN,RLE 0P ;EON f+' r� SOUTHOLD SECTION NO "Nb 2J OR,RR, _[� -- TAM NAVK„ --L—_ a Real Property Tax Service Agency Y 12.1 A.or 1214 , .%.w[mr 1F—_[—_ PAPS r,IFP DKiR0O1�OF ANT PoPTNI OF IXE I_ ,Come.1. ly1 un ,�,N. ^” -.-- ,mm.Deno[ — --- YNEOL T COSI SUFFwitH00%GOTTEN I,Y NS K PRORATED 0 County Center Riverhead,N Y 11901 nwc., 093 RATER PEAL PT WRITTEN PEPWSSION OF THE +4.700: w. SOLE W FEET IA y.+,K" il+s _ __ _ -__ „" —_ ~�— PEAL PROPERTY T,%SFAviG[,CFnLT ��409. ,vo a °f° ' ta- ..T_.. - r..� �'... _ -i.T .,:„..-.'1,-,,,81111;11.01, :::,,,,,,.. .....888,...'- = r 1 r�` d ! - a.• — - 1000 `°` �_ s � ,.s rF y:..x<v Y a.. '�.� a s l� �. ,Y ",' ��4�A o _ _ 0Yq - wC, ...rn>v�'£-r'S A.- y ^) n , y #?fi^a- CXR ,'az[-w.. >„ f 5 e,n n. -t e HATCH �— UNE a��` q it ^l _� CN �E ZaRPa N� °11 e°. ., 3 SEE SEC No Q 19 /�_a — oo r - -� �p FOR Pu Na A ,Ab SEE SEC NO''@ 095-01-005 1 d F0 CO vs .,. •Y� - 4 o 09 10 IA A O .J - R PCS m FOR PCL NO SEE SEC.NE,\ 051-0 own SEE SEC.NO- OJl`0 /`• - - 095-01-004.3 t. CD SEE SEC.NO 130 Q s 21TAI01 -- O ZZ 1 10. .. xa4m1 ' E — 9 ' • la Jdlc ., 'O FOR PCL.NO. 2y SEE SEC.NO 17 ..1.11o1 ,; COUNTY OF SMOLT S q 095-01-003-1 ]Sd(cl i '' 4Frl6OCAS.l OCAS. O \G 163 \G\ ® 154 0 '. TORN OF SOUTHOLD .Q OtErELOPAOM MOO 14 6 •96 p, ;� 3561c1 . .. 506 P• 4 17 WA A .E 13 ®r Q D4 L1AIc1 ns • .n O ,C? 9O 121 ` 1 i Ir 21 i.2'cl _ J O 4 121 }1 OAId • 1a[FI O e LJ FM PCL NO SEE SEC.No © hSp 9S-01-002 ~ 3 BAIcI /,,, Ifill r • 10 , 2603 FOR PLL NO BOdlcl F S'�PT SEE SEC NU. friiwipi I" 4. �� a z JJ z5 IA - JT)A41 a - .04'.* • 3 4i0[I PCL.NO FOR PCL NO FOR PCL NO FOR PCL NO SO LIMAi FOP PCL NO 4' 11 w l INA SEE SEC NO SEE SEC NO SEE SEC NO 2 100-02-001 SEE SEC NO l2 94(U 31 10' 1 lAlcl 100-02-002 SEF SEC r00 100-02-0061 1 100-02.00] 100-02-001 1r PA R. l 1 3.2 r' Ltdl51 - .i DAT. -�-- ---Z 7-- a - , O —�-- —2L_ —Z -----Z— �2— LWE PQ R0S1,6w W SEE SEC NO 100 SEE SEC.NO 1000 )00 ma ..,.tl. ,. —�— ®...mo.. 7211 ,Q.rdr ra mono.0 ,a<,.Door w I. - 007 TEE o. i _ Op4. °.* NOTICE ,, ,,0o. R ,•)0•- ® [M.,D.n.0� — -- .0.0)0.0. --B-_ .0%4[ss ICRMa psLATIES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K T""" SOUTHOLD SECTION NO -V-- Loa ,n..D.,...0[.v —_.—_ y.�p.D,�. _PSI—_ YpLO NNiIEN,NCE.LLTERA vpN,SALE ORw. j)02 Red Property Tax Service Agency Y ,p,Dv.r,a 0K1R.BUTIM OF MY ORI.OF INE er s YI11II 6 e+.0e zJ R. 1z 1 A101 or 12 v r'...L..• —--_ F)0.m .. —-L—_ ,Yk.W,.. —_.—_ „19 .507 sleroLA CORM r,I NO K PRpOBIr(0 °� ; Canty Canter w rmluoLt N Y 11901 V <' 094 Fners vs ]z 1 AIR/ r0>N. ----- [..r n r,x. —-S—- ,•nesry Weir W.—..—_ ,uBu[PCC .,1T4,lFx .RMali WRITTEN PERIOSSCN Of NC d bb" ]H I —_ —- PEAL PROPERTY T61 SERVICE a°cr .,�4a P o [°9 2'n`c1"3 1000 PROPERTY YIP ovens woman „�.. � �t rub.�l�a�al, f21) l..... O T.. -..f... -Pa— ,m...S.--"-- UWEss ORAIN rxclRE"To6 u PRPOITOS - _\ ill ,_c„ �..^ Y;, " _ _ 'Per W.r.,.w --•-- wee,co w H5. ARE SUER no°srRcrs Y NOTICE pp4} COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © N ° re"e' _ SOal L ew1ENWCE,ALTERATION,SALE OR E SOUTHOLD SECTION NO — HYDRANT } Real Property Tax Service Agency Y 23 4e vea 121 d(e)or 1214 r.n.1 - — S.NYO.•W1r.,Lw--.-- MIT DISTRIBUTION OF ANT PORTION OF IRE 00 - SUFGpLN COTTER ta;RAP IS PROkB1iE0 Canty Center RROOT Ld,0 Y 11901 ��IF 0 9 3 Of.. 121 Alel I.I. P.n W Mer tr. —_s—_ SssN.or,.01Htr —_ e.vuAxtt FAsrCVATER 0I710UT vP1iiEN PERUO50x Oe NO .�g P SCILE N FEET AI A-- "' REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE aOENCY . *SCALE w D6nS1 '' -z... es...: ... w �• .nom* r'''". .�..''`'-t,.' St., ',.'""="--',7-'`''''1" u>, 4 ,T a_o-. 3•h.^J.='.PvLni3 S 4,.;;.,. 'a '..J. l 3-' +n". J.'M- ..:2^ rtih'§ -t;^T 4. $ 4. :;'"; -W / TC11 LME upTCN u/1^ J [/y1, • q -/- e Q01� F :, p 29- —N— /��a , 0 AO FOR PCL NO `N„ SEE SEL NO 7'. Y 095-01-005 NII`' ^O (O FO• C0 SES - e - f LOIA SG 'ss a `vo •.1 - FOR PCL.NO sEE SF)NO J`\O / _ 009-01 001• SEE SEC N 50 095-01-0011.3 I'I SEE SEC.NO 130 © 4 v *a 19 z.nm- __ pl`O ZZ r,. l1p �� z.]A1cl n zp - - 19 320 - - FOR PCL.NO. 1B .JAIC ;� ?y SEE SEC NO v IT 151101 • 0 COI1NOR OF SUFFOLK 095-01-0031 `\ 100101 1010 O V�\G 1653 ,o 'a (6 TOWN OF 50010000 E1mx1"1 uxrsl !Q ,,'NII / `v 1REVTLOP..NY.ISI, * �� yr I ® y9- I 1/ 1 16 ]94101 SOp ]i 54101 A 0 s p 0 ']' 13 �'+ s ro O A '90 p.IE:, 121 Ls LIAlc/ „1 °, O i ,,n. s'• c 1211101 ] 4 ' 21 sl ic'l a 104101 Y O 134101 s FIX!PCL N0. ••`•® S AOl SEE SEC NO. 0 S'9p 095-01-002 11 SEE �,\~ 3 811101 SpA 9 ' L1.� 8 p 2 26 04 FOR PCL.NO 10 4W AO w16' �dJ SEE SEC.NO B Mc/ S 095-p1-O011 a 3.3 53 *Ilikliii‘4"4 25 34 263T 12101 FOR Ptt.NO FOR P0.NO FOR PCL NO FOR PCL NO IO 04101 7 51 FOR P0.NO I] a 3 111101 SEE SEC NO SEE SEC NO. SEE SEC NO SEE SEC.NO l2 54(01 5 ,Y 2 41 100-02-001 100-62-002 100-OZ-007 4• SEE SEC N0. 100-02-0061 11911 P 110.101 Ipp-p2-001 i Iwu *02100 --- z ---Z— —z� --�— ---Z *% —�— �— 700 4. `.. SEE SEC x0 100 SEE SEUNE " pO W G NO ]OO a 0o0 O m a w 4005,W""�10' NOTICE K P•F i090 2 SOUTHOLD SECTION NO a •r.— —�— ,�„.°°., 021) Q So. oWnh,w — — — 6. " rxE�RTe UNCR"` .pont oe; COUNTY OF SUFFOLK P. wrt YAWIEHANCE,AlTFRATON,SALE OR °',1!, Red Property Tax Service Agency Y SawD� __- Sale. •r.r 1n --.—_ m,v.0 rn,.n.—Nst-- E "xe 1° „LPM DISTRIBUTION OF WY PORTON OF THE 54 s1)R PO• S YLLALE 6 +w 23 u.R„°* .. �r __— 1 co.1w —_ —_ ,,.,,,.,W,,.f iw—-.—_ ..A 1 i',', RDuzL S.F.COMET TAX um Is PRDI®ITEO •®.*i gf Canty Center FeverAeod,N Y 11901 Y 0 9 4 12 3 AM yr 52 U 1 mv.,.a —-. ...f +43/ SCALE IN FEET m1a Pow Aw84AKY vlltEvslFP vnMDIlr WRITTEN PERAOSWx OF 1HE '.gip' j.b m A 1psgfd Ae.• 12111e1 1.4.. �___� y..W+e.,tw —_s—_ REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE SCENCi 90 1 P ass 1°R ..k.".' a.Dau PROPERTY MAP 00050SO2 LIAIEM• .20 ass .kt,0,30,000T EN dYfl Alil3dONd 000L U13ttllm o d •x]x39.330935 srl 33x33dOtle T3tl -- -- `0. .a,erw 1>0123 ..0 PPM. u d to 1Y a ai ��$.rj'. 3x13000155.93.1 N311Rl01MW0 113100.3157. ,JN001KIn --..—.al man.a.nrun --a_— sun.N0.3 __ V 6� z M 13311 3185 4" 411 3,nf9 ,tee _— _ __,_— .a. --— ..I 40,VI el.N.lO,f LZI � [y^' 'a�v IS; .® 031.3KM 9 an A11 num 4131115 I061I A N'Poa,lranl� 3011163 R11ro04' 11,7x —•m,a.m o..<., 9 009T1* o L C 311 w N9LLwd ANI A Ngw65lm 3y, __ _.n w. wan _—._— u1 19.99001.901. �Oua6d aOfA�aS MI R}JadOJd pail w3ir5 wu.u31n3vnN3,n.n 44,44444_ w..-a wro - ,.,9.31019.0 ON.011035 OlOH1n0S 36 xwi z.c 1 Onvs M 0 �1 1 1 I I .1 ``�Qf*',- 30110. 531tl3dOtld rn 39w3x10 N..w ssWI -—x .m....o re.ow —n,l 0991.0 �w .4.0 O NiodJns n AlNnoo •519d19a 3x1�fi. mn -- 9__ ..99 999,99., O (TE) Nnww W.00.% —�-- --- �,.w ., 1..,�.6. .121.9 Woo - Y g 000 ON.33S 335 001'ON 335 335 m3zux '6' 3031 ----Z-- --x-- k -- —Z--- —Z— —�-- —Z__. � -- —KU" 13,1(•3 Kt VI I 2'6 Vgn q�' 600-20-001 x 000-20-000 } Loa-w-000 I>!Z'i 0i 2 [900-20-00[ t00-ZO-OOI • K 'a3 33S 335 ON 335 335 13N 035 335 • S lalv52l -ON.335 33S P100 OL 'ON•lad NOS ON 13d 1333 ON lad N0! In 335 335 10(7[['1 o r[ 1 1 lad NO3 L '013 133 tlod =lvcl b E d g it us - PIVL LS 2 4„,-S"' ®S VrSZ r6 5e1'wo-t0-s6a51=,006 a '1 '03735 335 p49 4d Ot Co 4, 1:111 lad NO3 Vo 92 LI • 4 y `I 4 � O. b ; Oa vzs 1=iib \\*i 200-10-560 Ac: ta O MN.335 335 N' h 0 In lad NOS ' 1>I 4011110 Vl l L „` •`` (MItE O , PIVOT f t2[ Ili' a 10,71 i °e. a O x. - a 61 y.-It* - a" 4 , IY - IaIVSLi c VRS ° ` •• II 1>, ® ` Sa R1 9 L 1 e J - SQ Q. 'V xanlN,xe.v,00, ?a 0. I1lONl1lps 30 6(01 c5si ® 33 Isom/lxznaovum (0)75 L[00-00-000 'c Of.• 151x r- a PWS 3 L0 ` 3103305 30 11NM3 0.'335335 600 , am' BI 141-13.1 004 0. ° _ alar n ae ' — az % `" r 101712• u d �\ _- OL I 0 =nrL - A,,,e[ 000 ON•335 335 05 '0.'335 335 01 9-960 - - di '01'Vd N04 V,IN 004 lam. °e o' a 76P' SQ VI 01 n •s 9a I n� m S6 O) O� 'fill 'I�•3 O) O. 500-35 33 6 •� 1 O O I �-n n ON•335 335 .31:66..\.......,//' d� _ / e2. •al•na Nm �f`• e2. o a �j 'r/:/y. -1-��,�; - - 1 . 776 a� w3fu j awn — —� 031013 - 300 01711 / — L (L_ V frb /1 '` o/ iit 00 0 ssz x _ ''s- r`614-7''-!;--1.r40-'`x .y�- ' ' '+•'�2.iY':�1�3'd0d'-' - .n.+...o..« .._._�-[tr-_ s-s .9,9,9-- u K_ ----....-".-,b...:,%"-. i.,${ - OOOI ax la5usu zx d { ., .. .l „+ ._ _ 1^;;. :-z^�' -_s ..•�, ';' - 99.:;t". ..99‘..,,'9.9.00, X11 ,,� 00..-s r � , 3000 33,tl35 MVI 410300tld 1003tl _ H- ' O co wt13315 31135 01:4001 �.'0: 3,1 00 0101550434 031150 UM. nun.. 3NTBnv 1 r0 aw.yn. e_— •40 y..Q - . f=Itl IZ2 w.aoy ' `L(V- 9 3,TM (0611 A N�P0833300 434043 AIUIO] •< ��ONd 9 den xel 41wn3 0103SK nom' ma 0013( aT2t eo 10)7 i 2t n cn0 [2 g1nu1 A (aua5y aainJag zol d��adoi61a11 T:„. 3L 10.A NOd AM 30 AO0651m x In Or 1.04 -- --°x,1'41x0."+'.03 -—,-- 110,0,x0 1"0iik90 3105 nO0v9311v'33NVN31Ni7n 1 A.35 1300,5 aHro na, w 5.>.u, mAdns ON.0)1035 OlOH1nOS 30 xwl ca 3 . U 33110N anula3� a„.ano3 3x1 — >„.3.1rm•0'0 — w1• .n,.� a 9901.9.9.11.9.5 0(130 w..9 ~- 3 �io��ns �o xiNno� 311° -- -- � �.� b5=_ .�;'M% 0 .II MO IIZ, a -�9. ...1�.,wa SSIY3datld 39.tl3x10 x.00113 55 0 I __ E- �� `i� —, Town oF'�v1.ith®Id ZBA - a . , )3i; O App. Name O TaxMap O File No. . f❑II SE Board Member Gerard P. GoehringerTT^ Search: '' El Unliste44-:.7-,,--..:....,:,.7_-:714,,,,,,---=---.------ ___._ ___ _ ...._ _- j ❑ Other Hearing Time: 9:50 AM File Number:16033 Tax Map: 94.-1-7 ; App. Name: LANDAU,Adrienne i; Received Date:.7/1872007 Tot. Fees: x400.00 a Hamlet Mattituck Type: iResidential Zone FR-176-7 Date forwarded to Town Clerk 4/18/2051, '.i 3.Status: New €Action: Meeting Dates Building Dept. Location 855 Soundvie_w,Ave,. rMeeting Date /31/2007'0rND Date 111/4/2006i, Short Additions/alterations - bluff setback 18.5' instead of ;; Hearing Date 1 /31/2007 ND Date 2 4/4/2007jr 100, 280-116._. l: Hearing Date 2ND Date 3 Copy €E li -_ ' --- '_ Hearing Date 3 j ND Date 4` Prior ZBA 3691 (1987/1988) Send S &W memo. l Hearing Date 4 ND Date 5r-_ Notes i; Hearing Date 5 , ND Date 6J _ ._l il Action Date: ND Date 71-7 15/1/2007VA 110:56 AMI CAPS I NUM F ;Developed by the Southold Town Data Processing Department::, 1-°`eT) 603_3 (-44-6 . °`-'44_., NEW APPLICATION SET-UP STEPS EFFECTIVE 8/2/06 PART II CHECK BOXES AS COMPLETED [d Staple this form to outside of file. 140 1. [J( Pull ZBA copy of ND. 2. [4 Check file boxes for priors. If priors, complete LF research; print with maps and make 7 copies. 3. [v]/ Assign next number on list; put number on outside of file folder. 4. [� Date stamp entire original application w/file number. 5. [ Hole punch entire original application (before sending to TC). 6. [v]' Enter priors or other new appeal on ZBA application program 7. [Aand on newly created index card. Print program record. 8. [,✓]� Print contact info & tape to front of file. 9. [4/ Prepare transmittal to Town Clerk (3 copies). 10. [a Send original application w/transmittal & check to Town Clerk. 11. [,jf Note inside file folders w/prior info (copy file card) and staple other index cards inside left cover. 12. [4 Copy County Tax Map; highlight parcel and mark neighbors (across streets etc). 13. Make 7 copies and put w/each packet. 14. [ Add preparer initials & date to (Notes on computer program) when all of above is complete (now ready for tech reviews). 15. [ ] Do mailing label (to contact person or owner—from application page 1. P ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL, LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. 0. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-0279 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (631) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER (631) 369-2065 P O. Box 570 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 CARMELA M. DI TALIA (631) 726-6633 ANTHONY C PASCA NICA B. STRUNK June 7, 2007 THEODORE D. SKLAR NANCY SILVERMAN O� LISA J. Ross C `p MELISSA H. SIDOR Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals 54375 Main Road u r Southold,NY 11971 JUN ` dj r 200 I Re: Application of Adrienne Landau Ir(-°'�;;u, ZBA File No. 6033 Premises: 855 Soundview Avenue = .; Mattituck, New York SCTM No.: 1000-094.00-01.00-007.000 Dear Members of the Board: We received a copy of the May 16, 2007 letter from Thomas J. McMahon of the Suffolk County Soil and Water Conservation District. Mr. McMahon reviewed the site as per the ZBA's request and his only suggestion was that a new sediment and erosion control plan be developed for the project. Specifically, he believed that the proposed placement of the staked hay bales and/or silt retention fence was incorrect. We shared Mr. McMahon's concerns with our surveyor, Joseph A. Ingegno, L.S. Upon consideration of Mr. McMahon's suggestions, Mr. Ingegno has prepared a revised sediment and erosion control plan for the project as shown on the attached survey. As the Board can see from the survey, instead of running a row of hay bales with silt fence generally parallel to the bluff line, the new plan takes advantage of the contours as per Mr. McMahon's suggestion and also continues the row of hay bales and silt fence along the eastern;border of the property. We are prepared to implement Mr. Ingegno's revised plan as a condition of any approval from the Board. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Very trfly yours, /bw /�'_ Enclosures Anthony C. Pasca � m m) O m _ OTHERWISE NOTICEA. M 083 �, r _ ARE . T 10SECTION NO ,,,.ver,,,.. - ° later --`-- rr.wrv.,.rw. HST - sE.w YIwIEN.NEE..LIEA<r o.s.LEON 3.. ? © E ° EDIMaF SOUTHOLD b.N� a ` "� wrm —- Real Property Tax Service Agency Y133 23 need Arm 121 AM or 12.IA '•••In -- ,cut..—_.—_ 05 SUMO(ON T eTe PNVTIIS O<712 ' 093 SUMO(cournr 1.W NV IS PREMIER) 0 Canty Center Riverhead,31 Y 11901 N Or _ _ u. 'f cwmrm°m 12.1 A14n r murk, —_s— ,e^,b"r wn.r- =_—_ °amu .E ..STE•.IER WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ACME .-'''"i' r .SCALE W FEET A r tm~ L PwPFRrr 1g�40�. _ '. - 2 • ".s...• ''''::':'''';'--f' ;,'''''-';'70. . F • - .». L `.�'.d....,,,-/=-0.Y.,-- -.4 1 3i,.. REAL °4,—,---.„--_;,--,?,--,,,, Tn _ - P dfd L6i9:1 N]�SOOO - PFR . 4e .e.rm `.'moi xr-`^ =.,;--":,-5,,.--::::-.77--.:—,-.:.,,-=,:z. 7. -7,),),(2.6(2.„.6,.. /,y/ uATCN LINE AMOK C ^� —4„, �— - ZR� W a.Foo l� / SEE sE-01 1.2 oaw QQ` � -o J •e `9 —N— /y ' D O �O 5 FOR PCL NO ViJ, I SEE SEC N0. `4 095-01-005 7.,''' '5) 1 d •96 - •9 ;f. 1 1 A Q. 30.11 �La 4 0 0 .• FOR PCL N � aO /• ¢, d095 u001 SEE SEC 1n 095-01-001.3 SEE SEC.NO 130 1e .1111 ‘ • /ad'?4\ 2.7014 O 130 \C, < 2.]01[1 ., E _ N - 3 0 G FOR PCL N - 19 7010 C f . '- , 11501 COUNTY or SUFFOLKq� 2y 095-01-OUJ] 15014 IOFVTLOPu1NT 010x15, �p 1 VQ�G A. 165A '• TOSS OF SOUTHOLO `0�09SA4$* 11 15 ,avFLOPNFNI Rp1T4 Y6 ',11.1 790([1 5 00 y 17 5114 A 4F ilk'lk' O Q9 Y6 11014 A.!' s tz 40, " O4t'A21 4o n ]tim4 ,t DA14O l 161[1 m w n 3 1 FOR PCL NO h 1ci SEE SEC NO Ohs° 095-01002 yL�L� QQL~ $ lealcl 50A T �Q. 2 26.00 .- ///,;. 1 FOR PCL.W C) 10 P boos SFE SEC NO Y..: C`,Z, B 011[1h� 095-0]-0011 r 5 • 4 53 3.3 25 30231 JAlcla ___Z--,.. 10(4 111111111 , 'rk FOR PCL.NO FOR PCL.NO FOR PCL.NO 10 DAM 1 FOR PCL 1.0. 11 ] FOR FCL NO SEE SEG NO. 12.30M 71 LIAM SEE SEL NO SEE SEC NO SEE SEC NO SEE SEG N0. 1110-02-0061 100-02-001 100-02-002 100-02-003 100-02-001 1LBA LIAM •�161CN —_7 N 5 i1n '.O — --Z -- —2?-- --1?— ----Z �Z— Z� LINE QP. Y z°z BOO y �.•,Sy� SEE SEC NO 10027 ///Y�! SEE SEG N0.100 ,w, — "° °"""""— PS "" "` *0 °"" COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © p'. —. -- s.mu,.:�®o oo.. (21) r..m I. .wE . rdW; 0.nc msTRerS. NOTICE K —,— 0.0.' SECTION NO O ��� E-- nomOro --°-- L ALTERATION .e� SOUTHOLD ° " °o,.w'FWI,.. --•-- W,,.,mw..,ti- - ,1E°° ;,r, ^D OH SOLE DR 43 11 Real Property Tax Service Agency r MACE „°°, -- E.°:d an —_ - DISFOUt CO or ATO PDATar a Ii2 County Cantor 05210 d,N Y 11901 os5 0 9 4 ,w w.nrw rtNln 23 Nm �'u., --L—_ �,� ,Mu—_.—_ pans` rl fn MITER SLLTaIt COUNTY TAO WP IS FROWNED +.29, b' SCALE IN FEET 111 0/01 or 1210 Tm be.,ti —_e—_ 100000v 0.511 —••—- dNB1 000 iiSFfEOi£2 YnMQ/l MIEN PEIO�SgN OF THE Roomed d.n 121 AM Tme,a. s..wvW,ER. —_i—_ TELL PROPERTY TAX SEAM ACFKT. nU�. R° P Off loo 06TRt1 ro 1000 PROPERTY YAP £9010501 OHHI,0.01.14.Ism