HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-07/21/1999Albert J. Krupski, President
James King, Vice-Presiden~
Henry Smith
Artie Foster
Ken Poliwoda
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1892
Fax [516) 765-1823
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
MINUTES
JULY 21, 1999
PRESENT WERE:
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President
James King, Vice-President
Arthur Foster, Trustee
Henry Smith, Trustee
Ken Poliwoda, Trustee
Lauren Standish, Clerk
WORKSESSION: 6:00 p.m.
CALLED MEETING TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
NEXT TRUSTEE MEETING: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 at 7:00 p.m.
TRUSTEE SMITH moved to approve, TRUSTEE POLIWODA seconded. ALL
AYES
NEXT FIELD INSPECTION: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 at 12 noon
TRUSTEE SMITH moved to approve, TRUSTEE POLIWODA seconded. ALL
AYES
APPROVED MINUTES: TRUSTEE SMITH moved to approve the minutes of
May 26, & June 23, 1999 minutes, TRUSTEE FOSTER seconded. ALL
AYES
I. MONTHLY REPORT: The Trustees monthly report for May 1999:
A check for $4,628.23 was forwarded to the Supervisor's Office
for the General Fund.
II. AMENDMENTS/WAIVERS/CHANGES:
1. Crowley Construction on behalf of FRANK DI'ORIO requests an
Amendment to Permit #431 to extend existing fixed dock 16'
Located: 1650 Mason Drive, Cutchogue. SCTM #104-7-11
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI moved to approve the application for the 16'
extension, the same size ramp, but 1 float must be removed and
the other float must be replaced by a 6' X 20' float only,
TRUSTEE SMITH second. ALL AYES
Board of Trustee~ 2 ~ly 21, 1999
2. JOHN XIKIS requests an Amendment to Permit #4454 to extend
existing deck out approx. 6' in width. Located: 55585 North
Road, Southold. SCTM ~44-1-13
TRUSTEE SMITH moved to approve the application, TRUSTEE KING
second. ALL AYES
3. PECONIC LAND TRUST requests an Amendment to Permit ~4863 to
restore salt marsh on Cassidy Preserve as per new plans
submitted. Located: Wetland spoil site at the southeastern end
of Hasamomoque Pond situated immediately north of L.I.R.R.
tracks.
TRUSTEE SMITH moved to approve the application, TRUSTEE KING
seconded. ALL AYES
4. EDWARD & CHRISTINE VIOLA requests an Amendment to Permit
#123 to change the condition of permit to state that a boat
docked at existing dock does not eXtend more than 12' into the
channel and/or more than 1/3 across the width of the creek.
Located: 2850 Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck. SCTM ~123-4-13
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI moved to grant an Amendment to Permit 123 to
state that the boat and the dock extend no further than 1/3 the
way across the creek, TRUSTEE SMITH seconded. ALL AYES
5. PETER ENNERS requests an Amendment to Permit 447 to
construct a timber bulkhead at a 45 degree angle onto an
existing bulkhead for a total of 24' to end erosion. Located:
15 East Mill Road, Mattituck. SCTM ~106-4-2
TRUSTEE KING moved to approve the application with condition
that applicant keep the bulkhead as close to the toe of the bank
as possible, TRUSTEE FOSTER seconded. ALL AYES
6. RICHARD & PAMELA FRERKING request a Waiver to construct a
screened house with a storage area approx. 21' X 15' Located:
680 Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck. SCTM ~115-12-9
TRUSTEE KING moved to deny the request for a Waiver and request
a full application due to the amount of work that will be done
on the property, TRUSTEE POLIWODA seconded. ALL AYES
7. RAYMOND HAYES requests a Waiver to construct a 10' octagon
gazebo. Located: 3445 Pine Neck Road, Southold. SCTM #70-6-21
TRUSTEE SMITH moved to approve the application, TRUSTEE FOSTER
seconded. ALL AYES
8. J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of THEODORE ANGELL requests a
Waiver to construct a deck addition and an 8' X 8' free form
ornamental garden pool. Located: 305 Gull Pond Lane,
Greenport. SCTM ~35-4-28.25
TRUSTEE SMITH moved to approve the application, TRUSTEE KING
seconded. ALL AYES
9. LESTER EISENBERG requests a one year extension for Permit
~4730 to construct a dock, ramp and float to expire May 1,
2000. Located: 925 Long Creek Drive, Southold. SCTM ~55-3-27
Board of Trustees~-y 3
~ly 21, 1999
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI approved the one year extension with amendment
that the pilings be no more than 6" and no hand rail and that
the structure be built with low profile as possible according to
plans he submitted 2 years ago, TRUSTEE POLIWODA seconded. ALL
AYES
10. LEO OLSEN requests a one year extension to Permit #4800 to
remove locust trees and replace with others, place a 20'
non-turf buffer along dock, remove top soil and fill with
recycled concrete and top with stone or wooden walkway, install
driveways topped with stone, grade land, install a 6' fence
along rear of property, plant grass and landscape, install new
water line from main street to existing building, repair
retaining wall, and applicant will install septic system, only
when Health Dept. approves location of septic system and places
on survey and will repair catwalk only when he places accurate
dimensions of catwalk on survey along with dimensions of shed.
Located: 3590 Main Road, Greenport.
TRUSTEE KING moved to approve the extension, TRUSTEE POLIWODA
seconded. ALL AYES
11. Suffolk Environmental Consulting on behalf of CHARLES
GROPPE requests a one year extension to Permit ~4754 to
construct a single family dwelling, driveway, and septic
system. Construction will be on piles and will be approx. 47'
away from wetlands, with a 40' non-disturbance buffer as per
plans dated 2/4/97. Located: 985 Bay Shore Road, Southold.
SCTM ~53-3-12
TRUSTEE POLIWODA moved to table the application until next
months inspection, TRUSTEE KING seconded. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE SMITH moved to go off the regular meeting and onto the
Public Hearings, TRUSTEE FOSTER seconded. ALL AYES
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING IN THE MATTER OF THE FOLLOWING
APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER THE WETLANDS ORDINANCE OF THE
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD. I HAVE AN AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION FROM THE
SUFFOLK TIMES REVIEW. PERTINENCE CORRESPONDENCE MAY BE READ
PRIOR TO ASKING FOR COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC.
PLEASE KEEP YOUR COMMENTS ORGANIZED AND BRIEF:
FIVE (5) MINUTES OR LESS, IF POSSIBLE
1. Crowley Construction on behalf of EMANUEL ZEFROS requests a
Wetland & Coastal Erosion Permits to resheath and repair approx.
200' of existing bulkhead and resheath a 30' return on landward
side. Located: 12500 Main Road, East Marion. SCTM ~31-14-7
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
either in favor or against the application?
SUE LONG: I'm here to answer any questions. I would like to
bring to your attention that we're requesting to resheath
Board of Trustee~ 4 O~ly 21, 1999
landward of 200' of bulkhead and landward of that 30' return.
it's not a return we are proposing.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: I took a look at this and didn't see any
problem with it.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there any other comment?
TRUSTEE SMITH: Move to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: I'll make a motion to approve the application
to resheath and repair approx. 200' of existing bulkhead and
resheath the existing 30' return on landward side.
TRUSTEE SMITH: Second. ALL AYES
2. CHARLES V. SALICE as contract vendee requests a Wetland
Permit to rebuild 4' X 8' stairs, remove an 8' X 8' deck and
replace with a 12' X 12' deck, install a 4' X 60' catwalk, a 3'
X 12' ramp and a 6' X 40' float secured with 3- 2 pile
dolphins. Located: 2315 Pine Tree Road, Cutchogue. SCTM
#104-3-1
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
either in favor or against the application?
SUE LONG: The soundings were taken out there last week so that
the plans could be done accurately.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: On field inspection we wanted to know how far
out across that channel went. We didn't want it to get into the
flat there.
SUE: I brought some drawings and information that Angelo
supplied me with and I'd like to give you copies of them that
shows you from the edge of apparent low water out 100' The
back page shows it a little bit in larger scale. The soundings
are taken from the north and right down the middle where the
dock is.
TRUSTEE SMITH: What's the difference from the edge of that dock
to that 5.5 .....
ANGELO STEPNOSKI: The off shore edge of the dock is approx. 25'
from the edge of the wetlands.
TRUSTEE SMITH: No, No, then it would have to be kept to the
other side. At 75'
ANGELO: It's 25' from the edge of the dock. And 100' is the
last leg.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: And that's as far out as the neighbor.
ANGELO: Yes, it's probably a foot or two shy of Eugene's
house.
TRUSTEE SMITH: Can you hold this float back further than you
have now?
ANGELO: The applicant would like to be able to see something on
the inside of the dock.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I don't have a problem with this because he's
right next to the neighbor and a little shorter than the
neighbors.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: I don't have a problem if it's shorter than
the neighbors.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: The only thing I have a problem with is the
deck. I'd rather see it replaced with whatever size it is now.
Board of Trustee~j 5 ~ly 21, 1999
That's normally something we wouldn't approve new. If you came
in for a new deck.
SUE: I understand that, but when the vegetation surrounding
that deck is not ..... it's pretty much evergreen trees and
they're only asking for a foot on each side of that. Being on
that deck and meeting with the family it was small. I really
wish you would take into consideration.
TRUSTEE SMITH: That's that bench at the top of the bank?
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Yes. And that's 2 feet extra on either side
of that deck.
SUE: Yes, but it was crowded, really crowded with the family
there. I would really love to do the improvement because
gazebos come in that size and I've seen gazebos put in.
TRUSTEE SMITH: Yes, but this is really right on top of the
bank.
SUE: It isn't on the bank. It's off. There's a bulkhead
behind it.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: You mean in front of it.
SUE: Yes. There's a bulkhead landward of the...
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Landward of it, yes. That's what Henry means,
going down the bank already. If they wanted to put up on the
lawn like a concrete pad up on the lawn like a patio there
already. We don't want to see the bank de-stabilized.
ANGELO: There's a retaining wall on the shoreward side of the
deck.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: That's what we're saying, we would never
approve that new. But since he's got it there and it's
functional, we told the applicant last week.
SUE: Right you did, but .....
TRUSTEE SMITH: No, I can't see building anything than that.
SUE: You are aware that he has a patio up above, and whether
your thoughts on that patio were above them, it ......
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Above the retaining wall?
SUE: Yes.
TRUSTEE SMITH: It's existing.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: You mean if he wants to enlarge that?
SUE: Yes.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: It might be a different story.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: It's behind a bulkhead.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: He could even apply for a waiver for something
like that. It's up on the lawn, it's behind a retaining wall.
That might be a Waiver, not even an Amendment. We really should
stay consistent. And as far as the catwalk construction is
concerned, we'd like to see no piles sticking up, just a low
profile.
ANGELO: Why is that to be low profile?
TRUSTEE SMITH: You have neighbors to consider. Some of these
docks are built like that ..... and they look like the George
Washington Bridge, they have ......
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: They have an upper and lower deck.
ANGELO: All along that shoreline, they are all built the same
and they look rather nice. What happens is when you have a pile
sticking out, even let's say 30" is it gives you a sense of
safety when you walk down, and when you have a big storm, you
Board of Trustees~ 6 ~ly 21, 1999
have something to guide you down the dock if your walking down
there .....
TRUSTEE SMITH: You should stay in the house. Some of these
guys were using 12" piles and when the DEC made you go 4' over
the top of the marsh, to me that looked terrible. If you keep
it in accordance with what the neighbors have there now, I don't
have a problem with it.
ANGELO: There are 8" piles now on the catwalks.
SUE: Also when I was at the site I was concerned about the
reduction of size of the float. And Trustee Smith said it could
be secured with the installation of the dolphin, or 2 dolphins,
so I revised the plans based on my on-site inspection and
reduced the float to 20' and I put 2 dolphins off the side and
in speaking with my client.
TRUSTEE SMITH: That's no problem.
TRUSTEE SMITH: I'll move to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE SMITH: I'll make a motion we approve the application
with condition that the deck be replaced with an 8' X 8' deck as
originally built, and a 6' X 20' float with 2 extra dolphins and
that the piles be 8" on catwalk designed in a a low profile
construction type.
TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES
3. En-Consultants Inc., on behalf of GERARD GELBANKS requests a
Wetland Permit to attach a 3' X 12' timber ramp and a 6' X 20'
float secured by 2- 8" in diameter piles to an existing fixed
dock. Located: 1090 Haywater's Road & Fisherman's Beach Road,
Cutchogue. SCTM 9111-1-23.1 & 28.1
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
either or against this application?
ROB HERRMANN: If the Board has any questions. It's a pretty
straight forward application. It's been in existence there and
the application would like to place a float off it for lower
access during low tide.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: You can remove the fixed dock and just put a
float there.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: It was our observation on field inspection
that the neighbor on either side had a ramp and a float off the
bulkhead. He essentially has the same size structure already,
so we basically will be giving him 2 docks, if we approve this.
ROB: The fixed dock has been there for however many years .....
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Yes, we saw the photographs you submitted. So
that's essentially the same size as what the neighbors have,
actually it's a little bigger than the other side, but it's the
same format.
ROB: What is the objection to the ramp and float along side the
bulkhead.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: It's like an extra dock. It's almost like
granting him two docks. He already has a dock.
ROB: Well what about a reduction in the width of the existing
fixed dock. He obviously gets use ou~ of the fixed dock that's
there. It's flat forming and you can put equipment, whatever,
and what he wants to do is just be able to access down onto the
_Er
Board of Trustee~'~
b~ly 21, 1999
float at the water level at whatever it is. For efficiency,
safety, etc, etc. It's a very heavily docked area there.
Almost every dock there has some sort of dock or boat basin. It
seems to be a pretty minor request.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: It's just that to be consistent there he
already has what all the neighbors have and he's basically
doubling up. Then the neighbors will want a fixed dock next to
their float also. Where the neighbors just have a ramp and a
float coming off the bulkhead using they're bulkhead upland area
as a staging area instead of the fixed dock~ You see our point?
ROB: Yes, I don't see that as a significant point. My
observation is what is out there has been out there forever.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: But to be consistent .... you want to look at
what's in the area and ....... it shows right in the photographs
on both sides, and there's nothing excessive there, just enough
for them to use.
ROB: I would have to bail it then. I don't think without the
applicant being here, I couldn't tell him to forfeit a structure
that's been in place for a decade.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: No, we're not asking him to forfeit it,
what ....
ROB: What your saying is that is you were to grant a ramp and a
float he would have to give up the dock that he had there for
ever long. I can't commit him to that obviously without him
present.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: But if you explain that to him that he already
has his access, he chooses to have it, and he just had it
repaired. He chooses to have it fixed. The neighbors chose
to .....
ROB: I guess what I'm asking is, does the Board perceive any
impact for this proposal other than what the neighbors have?
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: N6, it's just monopolizing public land which
is unnecessary.
ROB: Well in this case it's not actually not public land. It
shows pretty clear on the survey. This is within his private
bOttom. Well it's adjacent to public bottom but the filed map
line actually extends out into Haywaters Cove as it's shown
here, as it does for that whole areas of beach.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I don't believe that. You would have to show
us title back to 1676 to prove that. I don't think you can do
that.
ROB: I guess what I'm getting at is that I hear your point but
adding a float to this location giving the general character of
the shoreline down there, I don't think would have any negative
impact on your bottom or to the neighbors or their use of it.
I'll get back to you on this.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Put in that light he might understand that
he's gonna be doubling up his structure.
TRUSTEE SMITH: He could put a step down at the end of the fixed
dock and get him lower to low tide.
ROB: Alright.
· TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Does he have a permit for that dock?
ROB: Is there a Grandfather Permit for it, I don't know. He's
had it repaired and replanked and all that.
Board of Trusteed-~ 8
b~ly 21, 1999
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Since he's in the paper work process you might
as well formalize that. Because I don't think he has a permit
for all that.
ROB: We'll have to table that.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: And then you can just Amend the permit to
include what he has or what he wants.
ROB: Well not if your gonna eliminate it. It doesn't make
sense to Grandfather it and then have a condition to get rid of
it.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: You might as well formalize the bulkhead and
all that. He's maintaining it. We didn't have a problem with
him maintaining it. I'll make a motion to table the application.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: Second. ALL AYES
4. En-Consultants Inc., on behalf of CHARLES LO CASTRO requests
a Wetland Permit to replace within 18" approx. 124' of existing
timber bulkhead and backfill with approx. 25 c.y. of clean sand
to be trucked in from an upland source, remove and replace
inkind/inplace existing 61+' of low profile groin, remove and
replace inkind/inplace existing wood deck over bulkhead and wood
steps to beach, remove existing wood deck at top Of bank and
construct a 12' X 20' wood deck and reconstruct wood steps down
bank. Located: 2400 Park Ave., Mattituck. SCTM ~123-8-12
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here whowould like to speak
either for or against the application?
ROB: This project has three components and in light of your
prior application we will leave the wood deck on the bank as the
third component. First of all as far as the replacement of the
groin is concerned, some of the recent applications we've had in
the last several months we've had a surveyor get more data and
information on the site to help the Board with their decision.
Specifically we've been discussing low profile groins, basically
what their height is to be from the top of the bulkhead trying
to maintain some consistency. The groin here .... we have some
elevations from the surveyor. If you look at the southeast
corner of the survey, right now the top of the bulkhead is three
feet above the beach and 2.1' above the groins. The groin is a
little bit less than 1 foot above grade. So we're proposing to
maintain it and reconstruct it in that same manner. The cross
section I put max. foot above beach grass and drawn it for
reference. I should have kept it at the same distance below the
top of the bulkhead which is 2.1 feet. At the time the survey
was done (could not hear, too many papers being shuffled) was
several feet beyond the edge of existing groin. So as far as
the length and the height are concerned we're just proposing the
exact same structure that they're maintaining, the same low
profile, the same configuration. But with no high piling on the
end. As far as the bulkhead is concerned the proposal is for
18", it would still keep the bulkhead on the landward side of
the adjacent property to the east. It would be behind that.
This would be the one time that they would be able to step out
and would not infringe on the beach than what's already down
there. I can wait for comments from the Board on the deck, but
the applicant would like to do is have some sort of sitting area
Board of Trustees-~ 9
~ily 21, 1999
in the area of the crest of the embankment. Obviously to look
out over the Bay and specifically to watch here children playing
on the beach. I advised the client that I didn't know what the
Boards position would be as far as a) a deck of this size, and
b) a deck overhanging the embankment. Those issues were just
stored in the application. Any comments would be welcome as far
as what dimension would be acceptable if a deck set forth for
less of an overhang over the embankment or no overhang.
Whatever your suggestion the applicant is willing to listen to
as your proposal.
TRUSTEE KING: This drawing is so small. Is this bulkhead gonna
remain the same height?
ROB: Yes, everything is to be ..... that's why we got the
elevations.
TRUSTEE KING: The bulkhead to the east is quite a bit higher.
ROB: I think on this one, I did want to ask if the Board would
be amendable to any increase in the height of the bulkhead. I
don't know if you would to the same height as the neighbors but
could we get any increase in the elevation on the bulkhead.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: What's on the other side?
TRUSTEE KING: About the same as this one. This is a fairly new
bulkhead. The biggest problem I had is if they raise the
bulkhead to that height, then all of sudden they get the groin
up higher and ......
ROB: If we add height to the bulkhead we can just increase the
distance from the top of the new bulkhead to the top of the
groin.
TRUSTEE KING: There's no erosion problem at all, it's well
vegetated, and there's nothing that's moving around here at
all. The groin I would like to keep that at beach elevation.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: The same as what it is now?
TRUSTEE KING: Yes. Did the DEC look at this last week?
ROB: I don't know that. We haven't gotten a response back from
them except from .... no they couldn't have because we just a
response from DEC asking for ...... the landward deck may or may
not be in their jurisdiction. We can't locate the bulkhead on
an aerial photograph but we have a Grandfather Permit from your
Board based on the permits existence in 1960. So we can't
figure out what we're missing. Given the length and elevation
of the existing structure in relation to low water and beach
grade I don't see why would reject this proposal. Usually we
get into problems where the structure extends considerably
seaward of low water or if it's several feet above beach grade.
TRUSTEE KING: I don't like the idea of the deck hanging out
over the ....
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Yes, you've got to keep the deck above on the
lawn area.
ROB: Yes, the deck is kind of the last thing.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I think what we would like to see is they
remove the turf out from underneath it so you get sand
underneath it and don't develop any sort of runoff problem. Any
runoff would go right down and recharge directly. It's for
their own good. We would ask for 1/4" spacing on the deck.
Just so we get that recharge and not the build up.
Board of Trustee~~r 10 ~uly 21, 1999
TRUSTEE KING: Could we table it and take a look at it, the
whole Board? We could do a joint inspection with the DEC.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Whenever they come out we'll meet with them.
TRUSTEE KING: I know Chuck Hamilton was out here last week, and
he might have looked at it, I don't know for sure.
ROB: Alright.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: They're gonna have comments on the groin.
When they come out we'll be happy to meet with them.
ROB: Would you be able to coordinate that with them?
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Yes. At the next hearing just have a new set
of plans showing at the end of the stairs and not hanging over
the bluff.
ROB: If there's any way you could coordinate and review this
one the next time the DEC is gonna be out if you could give my
office a ring and then I could give you a set of plans in
accordance with what you come back with so we don't have to push
it. I don't think they were gonna do this this summer but I
think they wanted to start in September. So if we could wrap it
up in August I would appreciate it.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Sure. I'll make a motion to table the
application.
TRUSTEE KING: ALL AYES
5. En-Consultants Inc., on behalf of RONALD & CATHERINE QUINN
requests a Wetland Permit to construct a fixed 4' X 68' catwalk,
a 4' X 12' ramp and a 6' X 20' float secured by 2- 8" in
diameter pilings. Located: 1150 Lupton Point Road, Mattituck.
SCTM ~115-11-13
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
either for or against the application?
ROB: This is becoming a familiar routine. The dock that is
proposed I understand that you met at the site, and as usual I
understand the Board wants the dock kept consistent with the
dock to the east. As proposed now, although in light of the Ole
Jule Lane situation, might want to revisit for an exact point of
location. The dock as proposed now is approx. 6' longer than
the neighbor. Similar to the Seifert application that you
looked at last month, your pretty much looking at 2 to 2.2" of
water pretty much as far as you can go out. We're trying to get
a couple of more inches at least try for the satisfaction to the
DEC. Pushing it in 6 feet to be in line with the neighbors you
would still have the same depth on the outboard end of the
float. So I don't think that would be a problem. The only
thing they would probably want to do something the Southampton
Trustees started doing is having a pre-construction conference
with someone from Board who wanted to meet with whoever the
ultimate contractor is so you can set a pier line.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I think that's fine with us however, the CAC
recommends the total length of the structure should not exceed
40' from average high water. We measured the neighbors
structure and I believe it was only 40' out from high water.
You've got 56' on your drawing.
ROB: What we did when we did the soundings, the shoreline
actually extends out as you go to the east there. If you drew a
Board of Trustee~ 11
~L~uly 21, 1999
line perpendicular over the neighbors dock extended 45' from low
water. It doesn't extend 45' from low water on their
property,,but if you draw the line ..... in other words the
seaward end would be the same.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: No, we weren't drawing a perpendicular line,
we measured from the edge of the marsh out. Then we walked it.
It's from the edge of the marsh out. It's got nothing to do
with the inland portion where they want to go quite a ways
uphill there to get the elevation, which we thought was fine.
It's only the distance from the edge of the marsh out.
ROB: I guess what I'm saying if that property extends farther
into the channel, even by 5 or 7 feet, if you restrict the
Quinn's to that number regardless of the context, it's gonna
have them closer to the shore than the neighbor. That's all I'm
talking about in terms of perpendicular line. If you stand on
the neighbors dock and look towards the Quinn's property, where
your standing at the neighbors dock, it's the same as 45' from
the Quinn's marsh. If you just drew the line out. So the
seaward extent would be longer but its seaward terminus would be
the same. Does that make sense?
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: No.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: If you live in the Cove and draw your
perpendicular line you could have a 200' dock. So your not ....
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Because the shoreline is not straight there.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: No, I wouldn't approve that.
ROB: No, I wouldn't think you would. But if your talking about
5'
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: No, I don't think we're gonna squabble about
5' Then your talking about cutting your dock back about 10'
not 6' I wouldn't have an objection going out 45'
past ...... because he measured from the high water, and we
measured from low water.
ROB: The edge of the marsh is low water. What I'm saying is
45' from the marsh ..... if this dock were built 45' from this
marsh it would be in line with the neighbors dock.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I think that's what we're after. (changed
tape) ..... the dock is actually constructed because everything
seems to be planning perfectly on Muntner and something went
wrong and it got beyond the paper work. So what I'm suggesting
here is that if you get a point with specs that before the
actual construction will commence that there would be a pier
line or something set whether it is staked or whatever so that
if they get out and it turns out they have to construct 5' less
catwalk than what you approve, that's what will happen.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I don't think it's as critical here.
ROB: It's not as critical because there's no navigational
issue, but I don't want to represent that we are totally
consistent with neighbor and then have you come back and say,
"the dock is 8' passed the neighbors".
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: No, I think 45' passed the edge of the marsh
everybody will be happy. The catwalk can extend about 10'
passed the wetland boundary.
ROB: If we cut off 57' and lets say 7' off the catwalk, the
catwalk would terminate 26' seaward of the marsh.
Board of Trustee~~ 12 ~uly 21, 1999
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: OK. That's fine. On our permit it's gonna say
at the end of that structure no more than 45' from the edge of
the marsh and the catwalk can extend upland.
ROB: The way we looked at it when we were at the property we
worked it out so that the catwalk would actually start where the
tidal wetlands do so that we have the elevation and have an
incline ramp up and beyond that it's really just grass.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: And we would like to see it as low profile as
possible. No piles sticking up.
ROB: You wouldn't want to be amendable to the DEC?
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I have. I had conversations with Chris
Arfsten about that.
TRUSTEE SMITH: I'll move to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I'll make a motion to approve the application
that the structure not exceed 45' seaward of the line of
wetlands vegetation, that there be 6" pilings, low profile dock,
no pilings above the dock and there be 3/4" spacing between the
decking and that the structure can go inland to accommodate the
applicant.
TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES
6. Proper-T Services on behalf of STEFANIE LINAKIS requests a
Wetland Permit to construct a single family dwelling and install
an on-site sewage disposal system. Located: 2304 Private Road,
off Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck. SCTM #122-9-7.18
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
in favor of the application?
MR. FITZGERALD: I'm here to answer any questions.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We went out on field inspection last week and
couldn't find the location of it.
NEIGHBOR: As a resident of the adjacent property we just want
to get some answers. Because there are wetlands and the way it
was written they're installing an on site sewage disposal
system, is that a septic tank?
TRUSTEE FOSTER: It's a standard single family dwelling septic
system.
NEIGHBOR: You guys were out there and I don't know if you know
that there is a lot of wetlands out there. It gets pretty soggy
and I don't know how this septic tank will work, but that's the
only concern we had. But if you guys it's OK, I guess it's OK.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: I looked at that today and the house is staked
out and is in excess of 100' from the wetlands and our
jurisdiction only runs 75'. The septic system will be governed
by the Health Dept. and that will be properly installed I'm
sure. As far as it being soggy it appears to me that that land
has all been reclaimed. It was hydraulically filled a number of
years ago. It's all gonna be regulated by agencies with
engineering degrees far exceeding ours. I don't think there
will be a problem with whatever they decide. They have to go
through the proper agencies and whatever has to be done will be
done.
Board of Trustees'~ 13 ~uly 21, 1999
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: It seems to be out of our jurisdiction. What
is that right of way between that proposed house and the dredged
'canal?
MR. FITZGERALD: I don't know.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We will issue a letter of non-jurisdiction
with a note that any activity within the 75' will require a
permit.
7. Catherine Mesiano on behalf of RICHARD O'TOOLE requests a
Wetland Permit to construct a 20' X 40' inground pool.
Located: 2280 Ole July Lane, Mattituck. SCTM ~122-4-10
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: is there anyone here who wishes to speak in
favor of the application?
MS. MESIANO: I'm here to represent the applicant. My only
comment is we have considered other locations but if we have to
do that it would require taking down trees on the northern side
of the property and that would really not be a feasible thing
aesthetically or utility wise. And moving it closer to the
house creates a situation where the pool would be in the shadow
for a good portion of the day. So we've tried to come up with a
location that's reasonable. There's no wetlands vegetation on
the rock and measurements were taken. I will have a new survey
prepared.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We noticed it wasn't to scale. I don't think
the Board has a problem but what we would like to see
is .... because there is disturbance by the bulkhead, we would
like to see a non-turf buffer between the pool and the
bulkhead. Also we need a drywell put in on the house side for
the pump out of the pool. Is there a problem with the septic
system there?
MS. MESIANO: We believe the septic is in the front and that's
why we've asked the surveyor to locate that septic system
TRUSTEE FOSTER: I think it's on the bulkhead side.
MS. MESIANO: We were hoping since the front seemed to be filled
and elevated we thought it was logical that the septic would be
there. But we don't know until the surveyor puts it in.
TRUSTEE SMITH: I'll move to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I'll move to make a motion to approve the
application with condition that we receive an accurate survey
and that there be non-turf buffer placed between the pool and
the bulkhead and I will go over it when you bring in the survey
and there be drywells place don the landward side of the pool.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. ALL AYES
8. Richard Larsen on behalf of ROBERT ROCKEFELLER requests a
Wetland & Coastal Erosion Permit to install 66' of one ton stone
armor to three sides of existing beach house. Located: 55185
North Road, Southoldo SCTM #44-1-8
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
in favor of the application?
TRUSTEE SMITH: I looked at this and I don't have any problem
with it. Move to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES
Board of Trustee~j
14
July 21, 1999
TRUSTEE SMITH: I'll make a motion to approve the application.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. ALL AYES
9. Anthony Salvati on behalf of GEORGE & DEMETRA TSIRNIKAS
requests a Wetland Permit for the clearing of dead trees, poison
ivy and garbage on property. Located: 65400 Route 48,
Greenport. SCTM ~40-3-10.1
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone who would like to speak either
or against the application?
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: What's done is done. I didn't have a big
problem with it.
TRUSTEE SMITH: Motion to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: Second ALL AYES
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: I'll make a motion to approve the application.
TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES
10. WILLIAM PISARELLI requests a Wetland Permit to construct a
4' X 28' catwalk, a 3' X 14' hinged ramp and a 6' X 20' float.
Located: 5810 Skunk Lane, Cutchogue. SCTM ~138-2-26
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
in favor of or against the application?
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Move to close the public hearing.
TRUSTEE SMITH: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I'll make a motion to approve the application
as per new and approved stamped plans.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: Second. ALL AYES
11. CORNELL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION, MARINE LEARNING CENTER
requests a Wetland Permit for marsh restoration resulting in
better surrounding water quality. Located: Orient Point,
Harris' Creek at the end of Little Bay.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
regarding this application? W~ were out there on field
inspection last week and we didn't see any problem with this.
TRUSTEE SMITH: Motion to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE SMITH: I'll make motion we approve the application.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second.. ALL AYES
12. WALTER GAIPA requests a Wetland Permit to build a set of
stairs from existing deck to edge of Marion Lake. Located: 360
Lakeview Terrace, East Marion. SCTM ~31-9-12
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
in favor of or against the application?
MR. GAIPA: I am here to answer any questions you might have.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: I looked at this and he has a sketch of what he
wants to do there and I didn't see any problem with it.
TRUSTEE SMITH: I'll make a motion to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE SMITH: I'll make a motion to approve the application
with condition that platforms be no more than 4' wide.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. ALL AYES
Board of Trustee~vJ
15
'~uly 21, 1999
13. RALPH LEVY requests a Wetland Permit to remove an existing
fixed dock and catwalk and replace with a 6' X 30' float and a
3' X 10' hinged ramp in same location. Located: 885
Arshamomoque Ave., Southold. SCTM #66-3-4
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
either for or against the application?
TRUSTEE SMITH: I would say this should be a 6' X 20' float and
make the walk out a little further to accommodate him.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Did you look at the plans he submitted?
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: What's there is correct.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: But we did have a problem there. He has an
expired DEC permit for a 3' X 10' hinged ramp. We did have a
problem at the very south end of that waterway. Unless you give
him a 10' ramp. Then it wouldn't go out any more than 6'.
Because that's what he has an expired permit for.
TRUSTEE SMITH: I'll move to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: I'll make a motion to approve the application
with condition that he replace with a 6' X 20'
TRUSTEE SMITH: Second. ALL AYES
14. WILLIAM KELLY & SANDRA SIKORSKI requests a Wetland Permit
to construct a single family dwelling with a trellis, well,
sanitary system, and picket fence on front yard. Located: 1840
Brigantine Drive, 756' north of North Bayview Road, Southold.
SCTM ~79-4-24
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
on behalf of the application?
W~4. KELLY: I'm the owner of the property and am here to answer
any questions.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: There was a question as far as the grade
went. 300' excavated and 300' fill?
TRUSTEE FOSTER: 300 yards. It just seemed like a lot. It said
300 yards of excavation and 300 yards of fill to be brought in.
MR. KELLY: Actually I don't see where any fill will be brought
in because of the final grading. That hump is 17.5 feet on the
southeast corner of the property. That would actually be graded
down. I think that's road clearance. Actually that would be
leveled out. The contour should reflect that but it really
doesn't reflect that because (could not hear him)
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Our question was, is the final grade on that
one?
MR. KELLY: Yes, if the lines weren't changed they're gonna stay
out of jurisdiction.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: I just didn't think that you needed 300 yards
of fill in there. I couldn't sge where it was gonna go.
TRUSTEE SMITH: Motion to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE FOSTER: I'll make a motion to approve the application
with condition that haybales be staked in at 35' non-disturbance
area during construction as per new plans approved and stamped
at meeting.
TRUSTEE SMITH: Second. ALL AYES
Board of Trustee~i 16 ~-~uly 21, 1999
15. RICHARD PIZZICARA requests a Wetland Permit to construct a
4' X 6' catwalk, a 3' X 8' ramp and a 4' X 16' float. Located:
150 Lakeside Drive, Southold. SCTM ~90-3-1
TRUSTEE TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who wishes to
speak in favor of this application?
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: I didn't have a problem with it. In looking
at the neighbors across the creek, there was one low profile and
one high profile and I would definitely recommend low profile on
this spot. No more than 6" pilings.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: CAC recommended approval.
TRUSTEE SMITH: I'll make a motion to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: I'll recommend approval with condition that
no greater than 6" pilings be used for a low profile
construction.
TRUSTEE SMITH: Second. ALL AYES
16. MARY KIRSCH requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 1,716
s.f. octagon 2 story dwelling with wrap around deck and concrete
foundation. Located: 9720 Main Bayview Road, Southold. SCTM
#87-5-24
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who wishes to speak in
favor of the application.
MARY KIRSCH: I'm here to speak on behalf of the project.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: The only thing we'd like to see here is a line
of haybales placed at 50' from the tidal wetlands here and no
disturbance to the wetlands. You'd have about 40' away from the
proposed deck to do work and show that on the survey.
TRUSTEE SMITH: Move to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE SMITH: I'll move to approve the application with
condition that the row of haybales be placed at 50' from the
flagged wetlands on the south side and on the west side to put
haybales on the property line adjacent to the wetlands during
construction.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. ALL AYES
17. MIKE ANERELLA requests a Wetland Permit to reconstruct the
configuration of roof and reinforce a foundation under kitchen
area of house. Located: 855 Pine Neck Road, Southold. SCTM
~70-5-33
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
in favor of the application?
TRUSTEE SMITH: Motion to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I'll make a motion that we approve the
application with condition that haybales be placed at the top of
the bank from the western property line all the way around to
the eastern line and wrapping around and following that contour
during construction, and to have the haybales drawn on the
survey.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. ALL AYES
Board of Trustee~-~ 17 ~Uuly 21, 1999
18. JAMES & KAREN HOEG requests a Wetland Permit to construct a
single family dwelling, sanitary system, concrete patio, pool
and driveway with no off-site fill required and a 50'
non-disturbed buffer area to align with neighbors on both sides,
and a line of staked haybales or silt fencing shall be placed at
a point 50' landward of the existing tidal wetlands line.
Located: 350 Willis Creek Drive, Mattituck. SCTM ~115-17-17.10
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who wishes to speak in
favor of the application?
TRUSTEE SMITH: Move to close the hearing.
TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES
TRUSTEE FOSTER: I'll make a motion to approve the wetland
application with condition that drywells be placed for the pool.
TRUSTEE POLIWODA: Second. ALL AYES
19. FRANK & ELIZABETH MURPHY requests a Wetland Permit to
construct a single family dwelling with septic system and well.
Located: 400 Ole July Lane, Mattituck. SCTM #114-12-13.1
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who wishes to speak in
favor of the application?
MRS. MURPHY: (She spoke but she was so low I could not hear
here)
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We were uncertain when we were out there where
the markers were.
NEIGHBOR: What they've done with this survey map is not what
they say. They've staked it parallel to Ole Jule Lane, 52' X
54' What this is showing is diagonal. It doesn't work if you
put it on the diagonal. Your way closer than 50'
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Closer to the pond or the road?
NEIGHBOR: Closer to the pond.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: It appeared to me that the house was staked on
an angle in relation to the property. Because we commented on
that. We didn't have this. We didn't have anything really. We
roughly had 60' and they show 58' here.
NEIGHBOR: My only other concern was, right at the corner, you
know the iron driveway when you were ut there, the old I beams
in the ground, under that is the driveway, he's at the mid point
of that driveway, but if you use that same line coming up from
those pileons, your 10' away from the Town lands. The Highway
Dept. just installed that huge field of tanks.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: Yes, remember I told you about there's a
drainage field under there.
NEIGHBOR: They had to backfill the tanks onto the Property in
order to keep the tanks from being above ground. What's gonna
happen to the water of that matched with the runoff when you
clear this? That's a 6 foot drop off if you step off the back
side of the back door of the tanks.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: He might have a problem with the septic system
where it's located because you have to be 50 feet from any
drywells. The septic system will have to be 50' from any
drywells.
NEIGHBOR: It's barely 12' from the driveway which is the corner
marker of the house. And no matter what those tanks are still
above the level of the pond. This pond doesn't have natural
Board of Trusteed~ 18 ~July 21, 1999
water source other than rain. That pond ..... you can go all
summer long and it won't rise an inch. It really relies on
runoff and rain.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: I always thought that was ground water being
so close to ....
TRUSTEE FOSTER: The ground water table isn't very deep there.
There's no test hole indicated on here.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Those road drains, they don't flow directly
into the pond. They recharge and then go under ground.
NEIGHBOR: They flow underground, I guess because of the
altitude change between the ponds level and the base of these
tanks. These are still much higher than this. So if you put a
septic system off to the side here your gonna get trouble. It's
gonna flush the septic tank into the pond.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Yes, but the septic tank is out of our
jurisdiction. The Health Dept. regulates that. They do some
exotic placement for retaining walls, and .....
NEIGHBOR: Oh, he can put in a septic tank, I don't have a
problem with that. But just the way this house is ...... I know
he wants to put it on the high spot.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Yes, he has it restrained to that corner
there. There's no where else he can go.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: Well this is a guaranteed survey so I would
feel fairly confident ..... I work with these things all the time
that this is probably more accurate, and I kind of agree with
Henry that yom might be ..... they may have staked the building
envelop as well as the house but when we were there I did notice
that the house was at an angle because it says house corner. It
appeared to me that it wasn't parallel to the property. Maybe
we'd better take another look at it.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: The way the house is place isn't as important
as the impact it will have on the pond. That's why we would
condition things, as we have been doing all evening. A buffer
area, of about 40' from the pond, where there would be no
disturbance during construction and landscaping of the pond.
NEIGHBOR: I don't think you can do that. The nature of the
land in that corner rises to this point. You try to put a
foundation in here your gonna have to go very close to the pond
in your excavation in backfilling. The foundation couldn't
remain below ground.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: I don;t even think that you do much excavating
at all.
NEIGHBOR: I think you will in one corner.
TRUSTEE FOSTER: The change in elevation from the the front
house area to the rear is pretty drastic. In this case I would
think that you'd want to be up a little bit to get a view of the
pond any way and stay above the water. It's probably gonna be a
situation where most of the foundation is exposed where there's
very little minor excavation.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: That's why we would condition 40' from here
and he put on the survey no disturbance. He couldn't do
anything in that area to protect the pond. I'll make a motion
we table the application until we get a final grading plan and
cross section and show a 40' no clear buffer from the pond.
Board of Trustee~~J 19 ~uly 21, 1999
TRUSTEE FOSTER: Second. ALL AYES
20. CATHERINE & RICHARD HART requests a Wetland Permit to
construct a 4' X 88' catwalk, a 32" X 20' ramp with a 5' X 5'
"T" and a 6' X 40' float. Located: 1900 Westphalia Road, off of
Sound Ave., Mattituck. SCTM #114-7-12.1
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak
either for or against the application?
MRS. HART: (Could not hear here) We need at least 3' of water
under our boat. The dock to the south of us is what we would
like our dock to look like.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We looked at this on field inspection in
relation to both your neighbors.
MRS. HART: The survey is kind of "busy". There is also a
question as far as the catwalk, the width, from the CAC. They
were out there the other day and it says 4' not 6' I just
wrote it upside down.
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: We took some number there. Our concern was
the size of the structure in relation to public property. We
always try to minimize and try to accommodate the applicant as
far as getting out to deep enough water without monopolizing
public property.
MRS. HART: You had mentioned the neighbors dock. We measured
the catwalk to be approx. 15' feet. But that;s not county the
dock (tape does not work anymore)
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Moved to table the application until Trustee
King does soundings, TRUSTEE FOSTER Seconded. ALL AYES
V. RESOLUTIONS:
1. ALBERT PALUMBO requests a Grandfather Permit to repair
existing stairs from bluff to beach. Located: 1095 Aquaview
Ave., opposite LILCO pole ~10, East Marion. SCTM #21-2-14
TRUSTEE FOSTER moved to approve the application, TRUSTEE SMITH
seconded. ALL AYES
2. Land Use on behalf of BENNETT KLEINMAN c/o CAL KLEINMAN
requests a Grandfather Permit for an existing 4' X 20' catwalk,
a 30" X 12' ramp and a 6' X 20' float. Located: 250 Bayview
Ave., Southold. SCTM ~37-4-2
TRUSTEE SMITH moved to approve the application, TRUSTEE POLIWODA
seconded. ALL AYES
VI. MOORINGS:
1. JOHN CANAVAN requests a mooring in Goose Creek for a 17'
outboard with a 100 lb. mushroom. ACCESS: Public
TRUSTEE POLIWODA moved to approve the application with condition
that the tackle be put in the first week of April and removed
the first week of October, TRUSTEE FOSTER seconded. ALL AYES
2. CATHERINE MC GOVERN requests a mooring in Goose Creek for a
14-20' boat with a 100 lb. mushroom. ACCESS: Private
Board of Trustees~ 20 <~uly 21, 1999
TRUSTEE POLIWODA moved to approve the application with condition
that the tackle be put in the first week of April and removed
the first week of October, TRUSTEE SMITH seconded. ALL AYES
3. THOMAS CARNEY requests a mooring in Goose Creek for a 20'
outboard with a 100 lb. mushroom. ACCESS: Public
TRUSTEE POLIWODA moved to approve the application with condition
that the tackle be put in the first week of April and removed
the first week of October, TRUSTEE FOSTER seconded. ALL AYES
4. MARK OSMER requests a mooring in Goose Creek for a 13'
outboard with a 50-100 lb. mushroom. ACCESS: Public
TRUSTEE !POLIWODA moved to approve the application with
condition that the tackle be put in the first week of April and
removed the first week of October, TRUSTEE FOSTER seconded. ALL
AYES
5. JAN JUNGBLUT requests an onshore/offshore mooring in Jockey
Creek for a 25' outboard with a 100 lb. mushroom. ACCESS:
Private
TRUSTEE KRUPSKI moved to approve the application subject to
applicant purchasing a boat and have Trustee Smith or Poliwoda
review application, TRUSTEE POLIWODA seconded. ALL AYES
Meeting Adjourned At: 9:50 p.mo
Respectfully~ Submitted By:
DIANE J. HERBERT, Clerk
RECEIVED AND FILED BY
TPiE SOUTii(PLD TOiYN CL '~K
DATE ~;~/0 ' F~ HOUR ~.'~/~-~r
Town Clerk, Tcwu o~