The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-35.-1-25 oS�FFOLK�� JUDITH T. TERRY Town Hall, 53095 Main Road aL P.O. Box 1179 TOWN CLERK til+ Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS e., Fax (516) 765-1823 MARRIAGE OFFICER � 1 Telephone (516) 765-1801 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notix of Decetmieation of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Town Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Dare: July 12, 1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the Implementing remotions pertaining to Article 8(State Environmental Quality Review)of the EnvironmentafConservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared Title of Anion: Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Ys CR 48, 1,139 feet c/o Sound Road,Unincorporated GGreenport SEQR States: Type I Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves a the change of zone of 132.08 acres from "Hamlet Density"to"Residence4Xr. The project site contains freshwater wetlands and a mix of forested and old field habitats. The site is also adjacent to Long Island Sound The proposed project is one of six(6)change of zones being considered by the Town Board at this time in the same geographic area and will involve common and potentially significant impacts. -Hix change of zone SEQR Determination SCTM Number: 1000-35-]-25 Location: The site consists of 132.08 acres and is located on the north side of CR 48, 1,139 feet east of Sound Road,in the unincorporated section of Greenport. Comments: The Town Board is reviewing this project simultaneously with the following applications: Change of Zone on Town Board's Own Motion SCCM#1000-40.3-1 s/s CR 48,more than 1000'c/o Chapel Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Chun Motion SCTM#1000.40.41 sjs CR 48,400 feet w/o Moore's Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCIM#1000-45-2-10.5 e/s Chapel Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCl'M#1000-45-2-1 s/s CR 48,805 feet c/o Chapel Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM#1000.35-144 n/s CR 48,564 feet c/o Sound Road,Greenport Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11,the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II,and the following specific reasons: (1) The sobpot change of mooing does not exceed any of the criteria for determining aigsi6ranee of an action that would warrant the preparation of a Draft BTS. Convm%*,the action will minimize potential eavironnuatal impacts thereby providing support for issuance of a Negative Declaration. (2) The proposed project will reduce the potential development density on the subject site. As a result, density derived impacts mcluding water use,sanitary waste volume;disturbance of Ind,traffic generation,and solid waste generation will also be reduced. Accordingly,the subject change of zoning is expected to reduce the impact of aite development with regard to these impact areas,as compared to parent zoning. (3) The proposed zoning is consistent with land use and zoning of surrounding land&,and win therefore not cause a significant impact. As a result,the proposed change of zoning will have a beneficial impact upon land use in the area of the site. (4) Cooeidoraboa has been gmm to the romw of the proposed zone cheap conducted by a consultant to Page 2 sf3 .HD"change of zone SEQR Determlmtton the Town Board,which concludes the following with regard to the site in consideration of unique site resources:'These findings suggest that any development on this site will have environmental impacts. Our initial impression is that rezoning to Rt-80"residential will provide a significant increased measure of protection for the environment than the"HEr zoning now provides. (5) Consideration has been given to a planning document prepared by the Southold planning Staff entitled, "Renew of Hamlet Demsay Zoning in Southold Town-Repot to die Town Board"dated February 1994. This report concludes the following with regard to the site in consideraiton of unique site resources: 'This panel could he developed in a mamnernot requirMnuthipk dautty user. Rezomhtg0 a lover density is mcomunmded" (6) The subject aite contains unique resources,and a occupied by freshwater wetlands over appreamately 3 acres of the site,55 percent of the site is considered meadow/brushland and approximately 35 percent of the site is forested. The site is also situated on Lung Island Sound The proposed change of zoning will minimize impact upon the Long Island Sound,it's associated bluffs,wetlands as well as the upland resources by reducing the potential land use density adjacent these habitats. In addition,the lower potential land use density will provide more flexible land use options to maximize setbacks and ensure preservation of unique habitat areas. For Further Information: Contact Person: Judith Terry,Town Clerk Town of Southold Address: Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Phone No.: (516) 765-1800 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation,50 Wolf Road,Albany,NY 12231 Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation,SUNY @ Stony Brook, Stony Brook,NY Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island Southold Town Planning Board!/ Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Village of Greenport Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board LBV Properties, Suite 210, 898 Veterans Memorial Highway, Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788 Page 3 of 3 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSs p Richard G.Ward, Chairman in F t a � �� Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. r P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. r �+ vvv Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards ` moo FaX (516)765-1938 June 27, 1994 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mrs. Terry: Re: Change of Zone on Town Board' s Own Motion: SCTM # 1000-40-4-1 - J. Geier SCTM # 1000-35-1-25 - LBV Properties SCTM # 1000-45-2-10.3 - Richard Mohring (a.k.a. San Simeon Retirement Community Inc. ) SCTM # 1000-45-2-1 - Siolas & Tsunis SCTM # 1000-35-1-24 - Jem Realty SCTM # 1000-40-3-1 - KACE Realty At its June 24th meeting, the Planning Board adopted the following report: The Planning Board endorses the townspeople' s vision for their Town, which calls for individually distinct or discrete hamlets separated from each other by open or farmed countryside, and which calls for the equitable distribution of affordable housing density throughout the Town. The Planning Board also recognizes that achieving this vision will require the careful consideration of the land use within and adjacent to its hamlet centers; that the Town' s Zoning Map should reflect the intent of the community' s vision; and that the Town must weigh the community' s interest in its collective future against the private interest of individual property owners in the use of their land. The Planning Board recognizes that the proposed rezoning of these properties will not deny these property owners the right or capacity to develop their land; that the proposed zone of R-80 is the base zoning of the Town and is by no means the most restrictive zoning categorization in Southold. The Planning Board endorses the report: "Review of Hamlet Density Zoning in Southold Town: Report to the Town Board" , and its recommendation that the zones of these six properties be changed from Hamlet Density to a lower density such as R-80. Si cerely, Richard GA. Chairman �o�pEfOIK��O JUDITH T. TERRY Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Z P.O. Box 1179 TOWN CLERK W Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Fax (516) 765-1823 MARRIAGE OFFICER .� _`� Telephone (516) 765-1801 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER �1 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non4ignificance Determination of Silp iScance Lead Agency: Town Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: May 31, 1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8(State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared Title of Action Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 nn s CR 48, 1,139 feet e/o Sound Road, Unincorporated reenport SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: The roject which is the subject of this Determination, involves a the change of zone of 132.08 acres from "Hamlet Density"to"Residence-80". The project site Page 1 of 3 •Blr Change or Zone; SEAR Determination contains freshwater wetlands and a mix of forested and old field habitats. The site is also adjacent to Long Island Sound The proposed project is one of six6)change of zones being considered by the Town Boar at this time in the same geographic area and will involve common and potentially significant impacts. SCTM Number. 1000-35-1-25 Location: The site consists of 132.08 acres and is located on the north side of CR 48, 1,139 feet east of Sound Road,in the unincorporated section of Greenport Comments: The Town Board is reviewing this project simultaneously with the following applications: Change of Zone on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM#c 1000.40-3-1 s/s CR 48,more than 1000'e%Chapel Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM#t 1000404-1 s/s CR 48,400 feet w/o Moore's Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM#E 100045-2-103 e,/s Chapel Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM#t 1000-452-1 s/s CR 48,805 feet c/o Chapel Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM#E 1000-35-1-24 u/s CR 48,564 feet c/o Sound Road,Greenport Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and$and the following specific reasons: (1) The subject change of zoning does not exceed any of the criteria for determining significance of an action that would warrant the preparation of a Draft EIS. Conversely,the action will minimise potential environmental impacts thereby providing support for issuance of a Negative Declaration. (2) The proposed project will reduce the potential development density on the subject site. As a result, density derived impacts including:water use;sanitary waste volume;disturbance of land;traffic generation;and solid waste generation will also be reduced. Accordingly,the subject change of zoning is expected to reduce the impact of site development with regard to these impact areas,as compared to Page 2 ora "HD"Change of Zone SEQR Determination current zoning (3) The proposed zoning is consistent with land use and zoning of surrounding lands,and will therefore not cause a significant impact. As a result,the proposed ckange of zoning will have a beneficial impact upon land use in the area of the site. (4) Consideration has been given to the review of the proposed zone change conducted by a consultant to the Town Board,which conclude&the following with regard to the site in consideration of unique aite resources:'These findings suggest that any development on this site will have environmental impacts. Our initial impression is that rezoning to"R-W residential will provide a significant increased measure of protection for the environment than the"HD"zoning now provides. (5) Consideration has been given to a planning document prepared by the Southold planning Staff entitled, "Review of Hamlet Density Zmmgus Southold Town-Repair to dw Town Board"dated February 1994. This report concludes the following with regard to the site in consideraiton of unique site resources: wrhi&parcel could be developed in a manner not requbing multiple density uses. Rezoning to a lower density is recavr mmiled" (6) The subject site contains unique resources,and is occupied by freshwater wetlands over approximately 3 acres of the site,55 percent of the site is considered meadow/brushland and approximately 35 percent of the site is forested. The site is also situated on Long Island Sound. The proposed change of zoning will minimize impact upon the Long Island Sound,it's associated bluffs,wetlands as well as the upland resources by reducing the potential land use density adjacent these habitats In addition,the lower potential land use density will provide more flexible land use options to maximize setbacks and ensure preservation of unique habitat areas. For Farther Information: Contact Person: Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold Address: Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone No.: (516) 765-1800 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation,50 Wolf Road,Albany,NY 12231 Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation, SUNY @ Stony Brook, Stony Brook,NY Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Village of Greenport Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board LBV Properties, Suite 210, 898 Veterans Memorial Highway, Hauppauge, N.Y. 11787 page 3 of 3 o��FfOIKC� JUDITH T. TERRY Town Hall, 53095 Main Road O z P.O. Box 1179 TOWN CLERK Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Fax (516) 765-1823 MARRIAGE OFFICER .� �� Telephone (516) 765-1801 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 20, 1994 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith map of of a proposed change of zone on the Town Board's own motion from Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District to Low Density Residential R-80 District on the property of LBV Properties, located on the north side of Route 25, 1139 feet northeast of Sound Road, Greenport, N.Y. Please prepare an official report with respect to the proposed change of zone, and transmit same to me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Attachment p at6MOdIn MAY 2 4 1994 ��II(JII II SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD • � Sul�J �S�EFOIKCOG� �S JUDITH T. TERRY ti Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Z P.O. Box 1179 TOWN CLERK Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS JO Fax (516) 765-1823 MARRIAGE OFFICER •��1 Telephone (516) 765-1801 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER - OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �8 April 11 , 1994 O u D APR 1 31994 Lead Agency Coordination Request PI�ANTNING BOAR. The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1 . your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed you will find the Southold Town Board's findings and a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: LBV Properties, Suite 210, 898 Veterans Memorial Highway, Hauppauge, N.Y. 11787, SCTM #1000-35-1-25, property located on the north side of Route 25, 1139 feet northeast of Sound Road, Greenport, N.Y. , containing 132.08 acres. Requested Action: Change of Zone .on the Town Board's own motion from Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District to Low Density Residential R-80 District. SEQRA Classification: Type I Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk, Town of Southold The lead agency will determine the need for a environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. If you have an interest in being lead agency, please contact this office immediately. If no response is received from you within 30 days of the date of this letter, it will be assumed that your agency has no interest in being lead agency. Page 2 Agency Position: [ ] This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [X] This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. [ 1 Other. (See comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures Copies of this request and all attachments to the following: Commissioner Langdon Marsh, NYS-DEC, Albany Robert' Greene, NYS-DEC, Stony Brook NYS 1-6gislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Planning Board✓ Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board (without attachments) LBV Properties, Suite 210, 898 Veterans Memorial Highway, Hauppauge, N.Y. 11787 Village of Greenport S�EFOLK�. JUDITH T. TERRY Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK c .= P.O. Box 1179 .� Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS VQ� Fax (516) 765-1823 MARRIAGE OFFICER a�� Telephone (516) 765-1801 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 5, 1994: OWNER PARCEL 11 1000-35-1-25 PROPERTY LOCATION LBV PROPER rES--- North. Side Route 25 Suite 210 1139 Feet Northeast of 898 Veterans Memorial Highway Sound Road Hauppauge, New York 11787 Greenport, New York 11944 WHEREAS, the Master Plan of the Town of Southold and the recommendations of the Town's advisory Stewardship Task Force have increasingly emphasized the promotion of growth in and around the hamlet centers, to strengthen their business prospects while keeping open space and farmland undeveloped; and WHEREAS, the Town Board has examined and extensively discussed a report entitled "Review of Hamlet Density Zoning in the Town of Southold" dated February 1994 which assessed the appropriateness of the zoning of all undeveloped HD zoned properties in the Town of Southold; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Southold concludes that HD zoning of this property is not appropriate for the following reasons: 1 . The property has not been developed pursuant to HD zoning, or its predecessor zoning, since it was first so zoned in 1971; 2. The HD zoning of this site is not consistent with the Town's comprehensive plan because it encourages high density residential growth at a significant distance from the nearest hamlet center of Greenport and encourages suburban sprawl; 3. The development of an intense residential area near the key intersection of Route 48 and Route 25 has the potential for significant traffic generation and will weaken the strength and economic integrity of the Village of Greenport, a key hamlet to the Town as a whole. 4. The HD zoning is not consistent with the R-80 zoning to the east, the environmentally fragile shoreline to the north and the R-80 and R-40 zoning lying to the south and to the west of the adjacent HD parcel, which is also being proposed for rezoning ti- R-80; 5. HD zoning of a site with so many valuable coastal resources and delicate habitat is not in conformance with the Town's Master Plan nor is it in the best interest'of the environment; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Southold finds that rezoning this property from HD to R-80 is appropriate for the following reasons: 1. R-80 is the base zoning of the Town because it retains the open' rural environment so highly valued by year-round residents and those people who support the Town's economy; 2. R-80 zoning is most consistent with the zoning on immediately adjacent properties; 3. R-80 zoning can best protect those areas with sensitive environmental features, such as a kettle hole, wetlands and possible endangered species on site; 4. R-80 zoning can best protect the irreplaceable scenic features of this property, particularly the bluffs along the Long Island Sound; 5. R-80 zoning is more consistent with the Master Plan in protecting the coastal resources and delicate habitat of this site. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk April 6, 1994 14-1&2 (2187)1-7c • • 817.21 SEOR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review .FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant.The question-of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: .2 Part 1 _ Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore• is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment. there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Change of zone for SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Name of Action Town of Southold Town Board Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may ha•.z a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consideree as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additions. 'information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Change of zone for parcr,l at SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 t LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) ' n/o CR 48 , approximately 1 , 139 ne/o Sound Road , Greenport NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Town of Southold Town Board 616 ) 765-1891 ADDRESS 53095 Main Road CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Southold NY 11971 NAME OF OWNER(II dltlerent) BUSINESS TELEPHONE LBV Proporties ( ) , ADDRESS 898 Veterans Memorial Highway , Suite 210 CrTY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Hauppauge NY 11787 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Change of zone by motion of the Town Board from HD to R-80 residential on this 132 . 08 acre parcel located on CR 48 east of iSound Road. This parcel contains wetlands as designated by NYSI)EC. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban Clndustrial OCommercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) I�QForest OAgriculture POther vacant/old field 2. Total acreage of project area: 132 . 08- 32 . 08 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Nor,-agricultural) 72 . 493 acres 72 . 493 acres Forested 45 . 877 acres 45 . 877 acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 3 . 099 acres 3 . 099 acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 692 acres 692 acres Other (Indicate type) landscaping 5 . 430 acres 5 . 430 acres HaA,"Haven loam-0-3% slopes ) HaB (Haven loam 3. Whatt is pre�fOf�inant soil tyOe(5) On Dro ect Site? - R A (Riverhead sand loam 0-3 , 3->3 , -150) , PI Pl moutri �ogTny san p arver . ymou ban s u uc a. Soil drainage: �We I drained % of site Moderately well drained % of site L)Poorly drained 5 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil*group 1 through 4 of the N' Land Classification System? NA acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) S. Approximate percentage of propos0project site with slopes: CO-10% % 010-15% 25 % 015% or greater 5 % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the ...ale or the National Registers of Historic Places? ®Yes ONO 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes No 8..What is the depth of the water table? 3-28 ' (in feet) Perched water at o+feet on site 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Yes ONO 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes ONO' 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes ONO According to Cramer, Voorhis & Associates , Inc. Identify each species Northern Harrier , other raptors expected. 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ]Yes ONO Describe Bluffs , cliffs descending to beach , Kettle Hole Pond 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes IFNO . If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ' Yes ONO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NA a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name NYSDEC # GP-11 and Lond Island Sounhi Size (In acres) 3 - acres 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Oyes IO§No for HD zoning (wetland area) a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? OYes END Greenport utilities b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ) Yes _Nocurrently under stress : 18. Is the site located in aro agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? OYes $No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? -Yes NNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? =Yes No unknown B. Project Description Project is a proposed rezoning 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) 132 . 08 a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: NA acres initially; NA acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped NA acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NA %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed NA g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? NA h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: NA One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure fills height. width. length 2. .How much natural material (i.e.. rock. earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaim- 'r OYes ONo ON/A a. If yes, for what intend . purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Oyes ONo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? - acres. 5. Will'any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OYes ONo Project is proposed change of zone . There exists mature forest n site which a be effectedNA by developme t t present zoning. 6. If single phase projec`�: Anticipated period o construction months. (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: NA a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes ONo RAI 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction NA ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project NA 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes 11INo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes KNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes j$No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? OYes )SING Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Eyes ONo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes )LINO a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes ONo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes 9No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes ®No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Oyes IDNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? OYes ®No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? OYes ®No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NA gallonsiminute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day NA gallons/day. 24 Dors project involve Local. State or Federal fundinq� nYes 9NO 25, Approval, Required: • • submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board ®Yes ONo Change of zone City, Town, Village Planning Board OYes ONo City, Town Zoning Board OYes ❑No City, County Health Department OYes ONo Other Local Agencies OYes ONo Other Regional Agencies OYes ONo State Agencies OYes ONo Federal Agencies OYes ONo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ONo If Yes, indicate decision required: szoning amendment Ozoning variance Ospecial use permit ❑subdivision Osite plan Onew/revision of master plan Oresource management plan ❑other 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? HD * 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Without public sewer service , 280 units/ with public sewer . 561 units 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? R-80 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 64 units 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Eyes ONo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/ mile radius of proposed action? Historic/LB , Golf course/R-80 , Vacant land/R-80 & HD , Residential/R-40 Vacant residential off ' e/0gfi a zone vacant land/1 -80 8 Is the proposed action compati a with adjoininglsur bnding land uses within a '/. mile? I�Yes ONo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10: will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? OYes PONo 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? OYes XNo 4: If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? '—Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? OYes I?-No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? OYes ONo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicahfl5ponsgo a Date Signatur Title r kC � JU�� "' S.,L.i A1J-T T% If the action is in the Coastal Area, and . ,u are a state J�encr, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding Part 2-i0JECT IMPACTS AND THEIWAGNITUDE Responsibility of lei/ Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Haw ,..1 responses and Aeterminations been reasonable) The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large.lmpact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The Impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but thresholc is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART ? e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderat, impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction Is not possible. Thi ..must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be ModerateLarge Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND --- - ". d. Impact Project Change 1. Will the proposed action result In a physical change to the project site? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. n ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. *.Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. C3 ❑ ❑Yes Nc • Construction in a designated floodway. 13 ❑ ❑Yes ONc • Other impacts Change of zone will minimalize 0 ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc Potential impacts through lower density . 2. Will there be an effect P. _ay unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ONO DYES. • Specific land forms: 0 0 ❑yes ❑Nt 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project t.nange (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) )9NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site containi a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: Lower density throughthe chancre of zone 9 ❑ ❑Yes ONO will minimalize potential impacts to wetlands on site . 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? IDNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑, ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑', ❑Yes ONO 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ®NO OYES Exampks that would apply tq column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO have approval to:serve proposed(project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc gallons per minute pumping espacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc • Liquid effluent will be conveye,6 off the site to facilities whi:h presently ❑ ❑ JYes 01-4c do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON( day. • Proposed Action will likel- LacjP siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ CJ-Yes GN, existing body of water Lv the-ment that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 01, require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ® ❑ ❑Yes ❑?� f 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface 1 water runoff? ISINO OYES Exz.- ,pies that would apply to column 2 �. 2 a Small to Potential Can Impact Elie Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact- Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage pattems. ❑ ❑ ❑yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: Poor soil. Lower density through a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No change of zone will decrease potential run-off situations . IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? NO AYES Examples that Mould apply to column 2 ' • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ Dye's '❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: Change of zone will help protect ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No habitat of the northern harrier which is on the State ' s threatened specie list. 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect norrtfireater ed or non-endangered species? (ANO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate r vpa MltlQated By Impact impact Project CttanQe • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, w"r* mart-made or natural. • Proposed (and uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? R)NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: Evidence of historic resources on ❑ Cl Dyes ONO site. Excessive density may limit benefits from these resources . IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? _ Examples that would apply to column 2 MNO 13YES ( )The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 'r A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: 0 0 ❑Yes ONO • 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Imped BW 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? y Moderate Large Mitigated By ONO DYES Impact Impact Project Chang, Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO IMPACT ON ENERGY ' 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑Nc any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑Nc transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑N( NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? )nNO DYES" Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ Dyes ON facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day)_ ❑ ❑ Dyes 0 • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local 0 . ❑ Dyes ON ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑N noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑R IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? 11 PONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ Dyes . ❑t substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑t form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑. gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbaCce ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: 0 11 Dyes 0 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 1a. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. 91 O ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures 0 ❑ Dyes ONO or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? 1XNO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(:) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may b mitipted. instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(! 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) CRAMER, VQ Hl. / SOCIATES ENVIRONMENTr \G CONSULTANTS March 8, 1994 Ms. Valerie Scopaz MOM PlannerTown of SoutholdMain Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Proposal for Services Preparation of Long Environmental Assessment Forms (EAF) for Proposed Hamlet Density Zoning in the Town of Southold Dear Valerie: Pursuant to your request, the following will serve as a proposal for services with regard to the above referenced. It is our understanding that the Town Board wishes to consider the possible rezoning for six undeveloped parcels from Hamlet Density (HD) to Residence-80 (R-80). This proposed action is a result of the study prepared by you and the staff, entitled "Review of Hamlet Density Zoning in the Town of Southold", dated February 1994. The following are the six parcels that will be considered in the public hearings: SCTM# Hamlet Location Acreage 100-40-3-1 Greenport, unincorp. 17.1 100-40-4-1 Greenport, unincorp. 10.55 100-35-1-25 Greenport, unincorp. 132.08 100-45-2-10.3 Greenport,unincorp. 20.07 100-45-2-1 Greenport, unincorp. 1.2 100-35-1-24 Greenport, unincorp. 62.3 CVA proposes to complete the Long EAF necessary for coordination with other involved agencies under the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) Act. We will also carry out field inspections on each of the subject parcels to assist in the preparation on the documents. It is also our understanding that you have certain information that will be made available to us to assist in the preparation of the Long EAF's. In consideration of the above we estimate that the preparation of each Long EAF will cost between $150.00 to $200.00, with a total sum of not to exceed $1,200.00. I hope you and the Board find the above proposal acceptable. If there are any questions with the above please feel free to contact me. If the Board authorizes this proposal, please let me know and we will begin work immediately as I understand that the public hearing will be set for March 22. Thank you for your consideration of CVA and I hope to hear from you shortly. Very trulyyou Thomas W. Cramer, ASLA 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 . • JZcBFiCE (A, . UFFL�I� Lct/aM�c.. •� '6v'� JUDITH T. TERRY ' < Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK , P.O. Box 1179 .z REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Southold, New York 11971 .Y�i.<^j Fax (516) 765-1823 NT MARRIAGE OFFICER i� �:�� Telephone (516) 765-1801 RECORDS MANAGEMEOFFICER • 'rv� FREEDOM OF INFORMA'nON OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 10, 1994 Thomas W. Cramer, ASLA Cramer, Voorhis E Associates 54 North Country Road, Suite 2 Miller Place, New York 11764 Dear Tom: This is to confirm that the Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on March S, 1994, adopted a resolution accepting your proposal to prepare Long Environmental Assessment Forms for six proposed rezonings to be undertaken on the Town Board's own motion. A certified copy of the resolution is enclosed. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosure / cc: V. Scopaz, Senior Planner y SOUTUOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD /JUDITZH T. TERRY ti Town Hall53095 Main RoaCLERKo rn P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Fax (516) 765-1823 MARRIAGE OFFICER �. i a� q`0� Telephone (516) 765-1801 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 8, 1994: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby accepts the proposal of Cramer, Voorhis E Associates, dated March 8, 1994, at a total sum not to exceed $1 ,200.00, for the preparation of Long Environmental Assessment Forms for six (6) proposed rezonings to be undertaken on the Town Board's own motion. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk March 9, 1994 i I , G ' / " I r I I •g.K�57�9^/ 3 � f y'Stl_� ES w --- jb9.g$ !88• �, O AV, O •o I a M `3 o CO w � S.I?•�6 's O'E. - 33.d$ — � - - - ,foo ' - _ _ .-_ �, .r. J I r t I i l / 7e F t '°s � �� Ev �una::wrzp„ei�xc?dona�nmcm � i fiagmn PC OI NeI:gvY rh 6lalb `-� _. :56 3:i ,•P,� ..b`, S. n,: v : JO "Y4� �. ___ � Cmrucn r.mv Ios of Aww ay mnot neerinD ' 3 mr, ai��r.o.ai"I �o,esal or '� TncSya ow�:ba-"-ll nal be mnslamea �. w 10 Cp-04.11a iryp ypb ' t'j , Cemnicse>nmsafadbartnn snap ntn prapar a and rWi his behMf W Nn s' Htle company,�ovammanbl agency yp dw 1 �' , `� i - a Ne as_i nlutlon IISNtl M1eraon entl lendlnBinsd. "J Oudan Guar�r.e=_ova not lrenslerebla - ' C,� "� I W D�edWNonal lnsLW�luneWaubaagaervt ' 14 15 �t• � w i v �y i� ,'y � lv •� � i 'J �Y 639. '76 -- ------ ----- �: :d,r,�, . •it u _ RT� 22 ryry�� PP�� • I y D LS 6 6 0 V 6 D � MAY 2 41994 if ,q ,, - — -. PLANNING BGARO T ED 1994 ::'OOc rICF: i/qN -0 )14-✓ RC. A PC '.ain. l.'U G/rY Gam, 'Y rx.'- i ,. r_. . ,.. ✓L.' - r ._ ., 'f-- 2S- _ - _ __ _ _ --- - i 49 46 6 ! �-