Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFile # 1 TOWAF SOUTHOLD PLANNI*OARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION F, SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location c ,a Application Date: / o78 / 0(0 (Cpcla-l-td) Site Plan Name: 661,4 Ilc' lrshc_ ircle v. Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- 38 - 07 - 7, / l;j ': MAR 1 5 2006 Other SCTM #s: 9 �I, ZB 3 Street Address: cS h `ny6wrl Hamlet: i✓tc St / �]�f f#�,� - ;. Distance to nearest intersec iod: Type of Site Plan: X New Amended Residential If Amended, last approval date: SECTION B: Owners/Anent Contact Information Please list name, mailing address, and hone number for the people below: Property Owner ok- - Dco L-it• Street On- / i n ro/n P/c z4 A;* c:- / City /V•y . State___, Zip /on z 3 Home Telephone Other / -a/a - 7 2 7 �/ 7 / Applicant Street City State Zip Home Telephone Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: Contact Person(s)* Y1}f YL.lC(/t if 05- 4L - Street 5102.0 11)4//1/ /;-)OA-,D City <SOy _/7eOt p State Zip , //y 7/ Office Telephone 3/'2 )- 11330 Other_f�+tnC : 7�p�- 4 /o 3 *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page 1 of 2 10/05/05 SECTION C: Site Data a is Proposed construction type: New X Modification of Existing Structure Agricultural Change of use /aiktn MkP /2t8/cruya�d7s5 Property total acreage or square footage: 2j ac./sq. ft. Ala'1^Qi 6M1 1�1� 1"es4a"' C'7W (0 77 SG) Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage:/04 552 ac./sq. ft. 13-15�71 Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes No X If yes, explain: Property Zoning District(s): M Ifsr AlreeWed Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: o? /."6 / D/v Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes X No_ If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes X No If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses: '-Ucc lila/ � d� �" �,�a,�ro�d C016 •- , List all proposed property uses: Other accessory uses: Existing lot coverage: % Proposed lot coverage: % 5" kr;cC> to e"te, qLj /ySsc. ';��IL 5f*^ ^-w B�cclo4� L.��SES SF anc./ Hc✓aAg�� =7, SAYS Gross floor area of existing structure(s):7SiSy sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s): ff_�yy S Parking Space Data: c%f et r '4,ac #of existing spaces: # of proposed spaces: Loading Berth: Yes_No Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: % Proposed landscape coverage: % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500" of a wetland area? Yes X No If yes explain: V I, the undersigned, certify that.all the Bove information is true. Signature ofPreparer: Date: Page 2 of 2 10/05/05 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Qualit Z` +'' FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS 6r F M Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always e manner, wh1ether a r ect oq a n may a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who d ermi aM� Fsignificance bay havQQel1 little or n formal q n�pptere ar ects of y h, knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental a clysis Isi addition man in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the rjueSt n of si niada e kn ledge The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and ager�ci can be assur€ rtitIgg Town has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introducti,olt,. ,an ormation to fit a project letpi-mi action. rocess Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD_. AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 part 7 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any Dart other supporting information,considering both the magnitude and importance of each and impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: El A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ElB. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' EIC. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion Name of Action Name of Lead Agency. Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Dale Page 1 Of 21 P PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. Gaia Holistic Circle s .�•»')_ '�"'' ."" "'`"``"`"''`''°'"°'�"— "� Name of Action ? 4 Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County)e/s L� t. Shipyard Lane, East Marion,Town of Southold, SC Suffolk County,New NYork r i 1 SCTM#1000-38-7-7.1 llJt MAR 15 2006 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Oki-Do Ltd.c/o Patricia Moore,Esq. - i Address 51020 Main Road if ' 'n City/PO Southold State Nov" ip Code -1971 Business Telephone 1-631-765-4330 �-- Name of Owner(if different) Oki-Do Ltd. Address One Lincoln Plaza,Apt 24E City/PO New York State NY -�_Zip Code 10023 Business Telephone 1-212-799-9711 —�— Description of Action: Proposed removal of an abandoned industrial building(s)and the construction of atransient hotel complex 1 14 gues7etc.), restaurant,manager's residence,various accessory structures(swimming pool,meeting rooms,gazebos,maintenance builrevished boat basin/slips,creation of lake/water feature,landscaping,reconstruction of existing bulkheading,dredging,tioratedshoreline protection structures,construction of new shoreline protection structures,construction of sewage tr on a 18.7115 acre site. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use O Urban 0 Industrial 11 Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) E]Rural (non-farm) 0 Forest D Agriculture 00ther Abandoned industrial buildings 2. Total acreage of project area: 18.7115 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 14.4 acres 9.1 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.1 acres 0 1 acres Water Surface Area 1.4 acres 2.1 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 1.5 acres 1.0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 1.3 acres 6.3 acres Other(Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: Elwell drained 100%of site Moderate) well drained_ — Y %of site. Poorly drained —%of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification Systems acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? E� Yes ©• No a. What is depth to bedrock NA (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: F.7/ - 17 1 E • I -i0%_vv/° "10- 15%_% LJ 15%or greater_% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? r"]Yes 1�01 No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Yes • �No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-I8 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? HlYes ONO 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes F-ff�No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑u Yes ❑No Accordino to: Cramer Consulting Group IdentL each species: Osprey nest in southeast corner of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? Dyes M No Describe: The site is located adjacent to Gardiners Bay. While portions of the site contains"dune species" in the SE portion of site,the entire been disturbed in the past. However,this SE portion of the site will remain"natural'. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes no If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ®Yes F]No I The site presently contains deteriorated,abandoned industrial buildings,that visually impact the visual quality. 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary NA 16. lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Site is adjacent to Gardiners Ray. The site surround an untamed dredged basin tensed in con3ucnon with the previous oyster processing use. The north,south and west sides of the basin are bulkheaded,the eastern portion of the shoreline contains tidal wetlands. An inlet connects the basin to Gardiners Bay. b. Size (in acres): The basin is 1.3862 acres in size. Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? F!1 Yes No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes �No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes �No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? FlYes ❑. No 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ElYes is No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes �. No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 18.7115 acres. J. Project acreage to be developed: 17.2 acres initially; 17.2 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.5 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. NA /o f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing Aband. ; proposed 189 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 107 peak (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 0 0 0 Ultimately I 114-- `ooms _ 0 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 35' height; l90' width; 200' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 928 ft 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 5,363 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimedEYes ONO N/A a. . If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaping _. .. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes R No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 16.1 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes E No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: NA months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 2 or 3 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 3 month 2007 year, (including demolition) C. Approximate completion date of final phase: 35' month 2005 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? El Yes F-1 No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? 0 Yes F]No 9. Number ofjobs generated: during construction 200',; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 100 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?0 Yes El No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? M Yes ElNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? E Yes ®No Type Sanitary stormwater runoff 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? 0Yes E]No If yes, explain: E ct includes the creation of approx. 0.7 acre naturalized lake/water feature on site as part of the landscaping. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? a]Yes MNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? El Yes E]No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 0.7 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used?E Yes 0 No c. If yes, give name Southold Transfer Sta. ; location Cutchoeue Southold d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Eyes No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: It isintended to recycle portions of the abandoned building(steel,concrete,ect_)during demohhon. 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes FNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposals tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18 Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [Dyes E No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? nYes 'ENo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes nNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? E Yes 0 No If yes, indicate type(s) fossil fuels,electricity to operate facility. - 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity. NA gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? D Yesr:� No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board Yes Fm—] No City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes � No Site Plan City, Town Zoning Board Yes No Special Permits for Trans.Motel &Restaurant City, County Health Department Eyes ElNo SCDHS Site Plan Other Local Agencies Yes ril No Trustee's Wetlands Other Regional Agencies ©Yes R No NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands State Agencies 1EYes � No Federal Agencies El YesE]No US Army Corp C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑. Yes D No If Yes, indicate decision required: 0 Zoning amendment Zoning variance New/revision of master plan D Subdivision HISite plan • permit use Special P P EI Resource management plan R Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? Marine 11(MIT)District 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 18.7115 acre boatyard/marina for building,storing,repairing,renting,selling or servicing boats,which may include the following as an accessory use: office for the sale of marine equipment or products,dockside facilities for dispensing of fuel,],,d -similar uses. I I 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? I NA 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? NA 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? El Yes O No 7. What are the predominant land use(s)and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius of proposed action? Multi-family and single-family residential,agricultural,abandoned industrial land uses. Zoning is R-40(1-acre single-family), RR(Resort Residential-Multi-family),M11(Marine District-site). 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a '/4 mile? ©i Yes ❑No g. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? NA Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 0 Yes El No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? L Yes f_! No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? El Yes No F_� 1 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? O Yes E No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. Ryes R No Slight increase in local traffic as per Dunn Engineering Associates review(4/2005). D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Patrica Moore,Esq. for Oki-Do Date Signature v Title Attorney for Owner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project,on each site, in each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. ! In identifying impacts,consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then considerthe impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact,also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NOM YES M Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot E] Yes ©No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table © El 0 Yes F�No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ❑ El E] Yes O No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or 0 E] Yes E]No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or E 0 E] Yes 'INo involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove 0 0 Yes 11 No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(i.e., rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No F_ 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e.,cliffs,dunes,geological formations,etc.) Fol NO ❑YES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ❑NO RYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑Yes F]No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of 0 ❑ ❑Yes E No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water © ❑ ❑Yes ❑No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland F-1 ❑ ❑Yes M No • Other impacts: 0 ❑ ❑Yes F1 No Reconstruction of existing bulkhead and dredging in tidal wetlands. Removal of deteriorated shoreline protection structures&construction of new rip-rap shoreline stabilization structures. 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ❑o NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10%increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface © ❑ ❑Yes ❑No area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes E No Project calls for the creation of a naturalized lake/water feature on site. Page 12 of 21 0 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? on NO riYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ri yes No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not © 0 Yes E]No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater El F-1 D Yes 1:1 No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water 0 El 0 Yes 1:1 No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. El 0 E]Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ❑ D Yes D No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ® 1:1 Yes F No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into D 1:1 El Yes D No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or 0 1:1 E]Yes E]No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without 1:1 0 D Yes D No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses 1:1 0 D Yes n No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: nYes 0 No Page 13 of 21 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runoff? E1NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows 17"1 LJ 11Yes ❑No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Dyes ONo Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Yes nNo • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Oyes ONo • Other impacts: ©Yes ENo FEI rmwater runoff will be contained/recharged on site w/subsurface structures and landscaped lake/water feature. minate existing direct stormwater runoff from aband. buildings&paving. IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? M. RYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. DYes MNo • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton 1 of refuse per hour. 0 Dyes MNo • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs.per hour 11 or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per ® OYes ONo hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land1:1 0 committed to industrial use. OYes E]No • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of O industrial development within existing industrial areas. Dyes ONo • Other impacts: OYes ONo IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? FNO F. YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or 0 Federal list,using the site,over or near Yes DNc the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: 0 ❑ ❑Yes Q No Osprey nest in southeast corner of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. g. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? F.�NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ❑ ❑Yes ❑No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ®. NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land(includes cropland,hayfields,pasture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of Yes No agricultural land management systems(e.g.,subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,strip cropping);or create a need for such measures(e.g.cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). ;;II • Other impacts: LJ ❑Yes U No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources?(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20,Appendix B.) n NO ®. YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different D Dyes F1No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of D Dyes Q No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or El 0 ED Yes D No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ® l 0Yes ®. No The site currently contains abandoned,deteriorated industrial building(s)&accessory uses that will be removed,which is considered to be a significant benifical impact. IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? MNO nYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or © ElYes [] No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within {J 0 © Yes 0 No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive Q 0 Yes 0 No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? F NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? ENO MYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1:1 No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 17 of 21 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? M. NO ❑ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ EI Yes ❑No • Other impacts: Dyes ❑No Slight increase in local traffic,impact will not be significant as per Dunn Engineering Associates review(4/2005) IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ❑o NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an © ❑ ❑Yes ❑No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ©Yes ❑No E. NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? r'-�NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blastino within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ r—I facility. ❑Yes ❑No • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. El ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts:_ __.. _ _..... ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No F. Page 18 of 21 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? MNO FJYES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of [� F-1 IJYes 17No hazardous substances(i.e. oil, pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" D Dyes 0 No in any form(i.e.toxic, poisonous, highly reactive,radioactive, irritating,infectious, etc.) Dyes • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied 11 Dyes ❑No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other 0 ® L`JYes RNo disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: Q Dyes ONo IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? FJNO RYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city,town or village in which the © © Dyes QNo project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating Dyes QNo services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or © Dyes ❑No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. © D Dyes ONo • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, Li 0 Yes F—INo structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community 0 0 ©Yes DNo services(e.g.schools, police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future © El F�Yes 0 No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ E' '©Yes 0 No • Other impacts: Q 0 ©Yes E]No Removal of abandoned,deteriorated industrial building(s).Generation of approx 200 jobs during constr. & 100 after completion. Both considered significant benifical impacts. 20. Is there,or is there likely to be,public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? ©a NO YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s)is considered to be potentially large,even if the impact(s)may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space,attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available,decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance,consider: ! The probability of the impact occurring ! The duration of the impact ! Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value ! Whether the impact can or will be controlled ! The regional consequence of the impact ! Its potential divergence from local needs and goals ! Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 12/28/2005 13:17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE .02 617.20 Appendix A D State Environmental Qualky Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM i Purpose: The MI EM is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, In an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question ofwheUter an action may be signlficant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a prefect that are subjective or Unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert In environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one partioLdar area may not be aware of the brood"cone"na effecting the question of ai9niilynce. Tho rt/.iAi.la.IM.aJv.VaJetr\pMr.eMa ogtivvl ugw.vlvy>IalLfa':wJw_.....J.r;iyv:�uwva tw:...........r.r�..J..l..wal.ahem.-.h•»Im.-r,.......n�.............. haa bccn.a Jc.ry, auu.IJl cl.cl.d"c h. ..oav v,�cl ncwlWc dwnJyh"n...IkJtr hMllllalbtlllll Vf IIIM IIIaUINI tV Ol a Ill lyCl.a tw eldllll 1. r.i nee J`.....r...nr.1a• The£„n car 1. MH a, r>•e•.4alsv elaises=..•..Ma�w.N:..s........a:....e6rvRws� •,u.ryawlwVJ��wi,.�. ..:................ A IPHIPMa.r in fhA AnalyaR rirwt rAt(PC III.Y•a In iaMt 7 Anfr Q Mae Z: r'.,n..+�.�nn I.�.n11y1^a ell,neu3n ret n.n�ypin Impacts thee may occur Mdn o Ia.'yect.., a�tiu.i. It rw vv�wa 4✓vMw, ..n os co wrwaw: iso Putelnteliy`iarye-irrlFracc-7ne----- --... F. also idwrtifias uAraehor an Impact can m nrkkJatn.f w.Mh.,.snr, Part 3: If any Impact in Part 2 Is Identified as potentiony-large,then Part 3 Is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Wel dry the Pardon of EAF Completed far this project: 0 Part 1 a Part 2 [:]Part 3 Upon review of the Information recorded on this FAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each Impact, it is reasonably detemdned by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result In any large and Important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which wit not have a significant Impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration wit be prepared• B. Although the protect could have a significant effect on the environment,there wla not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the nmitipation measures described In PART 3 have been required, therefore a COeDf rKWED rNyMlea declaration wN be prepared. C. The project may result In one or more large and Important Impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a peeltin de,I 'inn Will be prepared. "A Conditioned Negative Declaration Is only valid for Unlisted Actions Gaia Holistic Circle Q East Marion Name of Action Name of toad Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature Preparer responsible Icer Date Page 1 of 21 12/28/2005 13:17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 03 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor N()Tlr:F• This dnr..oment is designed to assist In determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on tho erwironment. Please complete the entire form.Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered ac part of the SPP"��+^^ren sppq..a++aro may be eVb)wt+o 1Vnrror vonnoonon one puo+.v.y.nyrv. ,•,vvldo ony oadlnonol lntormanon you ocnove will be needed to complete Parte 2 and 3. It Is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or Investigation. If Information requiring such additional work is unavailable.so Indicate and specify each instanre. Name of Action Gain Holistic Circle Location of Action(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) e/s Shipyard Lane,East Marion,Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York SCTM#1000-38-7.7,1 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Oki-Do Ltd.c/o Patricia Moore,Esq, Address 51020 Main Road �^ f91y/Pn Rmdhnlri State NV zip Coda 11971 Business Telephone 1-631.765-4330 Name of Owrtsr(if dlffertmt) Okl-Vu Ltd, Address One Lincoln Plaza,Apt 24E City/po New Yurk State NY Zip Code IWl3 Business Telephone 1-212.799-9711 Description of Action: Proposed removal of an abandoned industrial building(s)and the construction of a transient hotel complex with 114 guest rooms, restaurant,manager's residence,various accessory structures(swimming pool,meeting rooms,gazebos,maintenance building,etc.), refnrbiabed Moat hanin/aline,creatinn of Iska/water feature,lanilwanina,rrrnnsrrurlion of existina bulkheadina.dredaina.removal of dafannrafwd ahnrwhnw pmtwrhnn a}rin+r++nce,Rnnatw+rfinn of sew el+ereline Proteotion atn.ehlrva,oonaln+otion of acwoec trcotmcnt facility oa a 18.7115 acre Hite. Page 2 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 04 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Jilt LltS(;KIPIIVN Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. ,. f`rrtwnt L.mxl llen.I Illrt,an �_ IrxalsrriM L,..„J Ora,v„nn-.MI nR.-.irlr,rt:..l (..d,,.I.-0 �a,„nl /„�•...fa,uJ ❑Forest ❑Agriculture E10ther Abandone4 industrial buildings 2. Total acreage of project area: 18.7115 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or erushland (Non-agricultural) 14.4 acres 9.I acres Forested acres acres Agricultural(Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland(Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.1 acres 0.1 acres water surface Area I A acres Z.I acres U„veye,uaeJ (Rw6, —0, .,, nil) 1.5 a.,,a- 1.0 Rood>, building, and other povod wrfa ,,. 1.3 acres 6,3 ecree Volar(inalcam type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s)an project site7 t�1 a. Soil drainage: 0 Well drained _,100%of site t,,._I Moderately well drained_%of site. ❑Poorly drained _%of site b. If any agricultural land is invnlvod hnw many ar•rceof¢o8.nrnslacdfwtl ir✓itbinsrvLgraln_L thrmuolt4.nf.the.NVC.Land. class) E1 -- a. What Is depth to bedrock NA (in feet) 5. Approximate parcenrage of proposed project site with slopes: 00 100% 1:110. 15%_% Ell 5%or greater-,_% 6. Is project substantial) contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of I Il.IPM, Mq .A V._ _.. M Nn 7. Is project substantially Contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ❑No a. what Is the dgptn of the water table? 0.18 on reef/ 9. Is site located over n primary, principal, or;ole f.0urce ag111rer7 ElVos ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist In the project area? ❑Yes ❑e No Page 3 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 05 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Oyes []No According to! Cramer Consulting Group I each Osprey nest in southeast comer of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance dunng nesting periods. 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site?(i.e., tiffs, dunes, other geological formations? [']Yes No Describe: The site is located adjacent to Gardiners Bay. While portions of the site contains"dune species" in the SE portion of site,the entire been disturbed in the past. However,this SE portion of the site will remain"natural". 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? 0 Yes [Elmo If es, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? 13Yes GINo The site presently contains deteriorated,abandoned industrial buildings,that visually impact the visual quality. 15, Streams within or contiguous to project area: NA a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it Is tributary NA 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Site is adjacent to Gardiners Bay. The site surround an unnamed dredged basin unsed in conjuction with the previous oyster processing use. The north,south and west sides of the basin are bulkheaded,the eastern portion of the shoreline contains tidal wetlands. An inlet connects the basin to Gardiners Bay. b. Size (in acres): The basin is 1.3862 acres in size. Page 4 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 06 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? O Yes ONO a. If YES, does sufficient rapacity exist to allow connection? OYes ©No b. It YES, will Improvements be necessary to allow connection ❑Yes ONO 18, Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes [F]No 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 Yes WNo 2o. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? D Yes ❑e No 0. 1>♦ejeet Dtla"Jon 1, Physical dimensions and scale of pmJect(fill In dimensions as appropriate). o. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by proiect sponsor: 197115 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 17,2 acres initially; 17.2 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 1.5 acres. d. Length of project, In miles: NA (d apprapriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. NA% f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing Abend. ; proposed 189 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 107 peak (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: n.., r--iiy Twn rnmay M..Itiple Camay Condom;..:,..m Initially 0 0 0 Ultimately I I14roams 0 I. Dimensions (in feet)of largest proposed structure: 35- height; 190' width; 20V length. j. Llneer feet of frontagr- nlnnr3 n ruaMir.thomughfam project will occupy is? MR ft 2. HOW much natural material (i.e. fOCK, earth, etc.)will aC removed uurn true suer J,JUJ Lugo/r,ubk,y4i w. W111 m'— Kn m'rlmnd OVnc 131,10 nu,o a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaping b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? O Yes No c. WIII upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Oyes 11 No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? 16.1 acres Page 5 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 07 5. Will any mature forest(over 100 years old)or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? 0 Yes on No 6, If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: NA months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 2 or 3 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 3 month 2007 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 35' month 2005 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Q Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes E]No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 200';after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 100 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?❑Yes MNo If yes, explain: 12. IS surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes El NO a. If yes, indicate type of waste(sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal Involved? E]Yes [:]No Type Sanitary stormwater runoff 14. WIN surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?[:]Yes E]No If yes, explain: Project includes the creation of approx.0.7 acre naturalized lake/water feature on site as part of the landscaping. 15. Is project or any porion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Q Yes ❑No 16. WIN the project generate solid waste? Q Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 0.7 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Q Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name Southold Transfer Ste. : location Cutcho¢ue,Southold d. Will any wastes not go Into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfilrt ❑' Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 12/28%2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 08 e. If yes, explain: It is intended to recycle portions of the abandoned building(steel,concrete,ect.)during demolition. 17. WIII the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ❑� No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tonslmonth. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years, 18. WIII project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes ❑� No 19. Will project routinely produce odors(mare than one hour per day)? DYes no 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes No 21. will project result in an increase in energy use? ff]Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate type(s) fossil fuels,electricity to operate facility. 22. If water supply is from wells, Indicate pumping capacity_MA gallons/minute. 23- Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Loral. State or Federal funding?El Yes R No if yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 09 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board Yes No Site plan City, Town, Village planning Board Yes © No Special Permits for City, Town Zeniny neord O VCO ❑ NO Trans.Motel&Restaurant SCDHS Site Plan City, County Health Depanment QYes 1:1No Other Local Agencies ❑r Yes ❑a No Trustees Wetlands Other Regional Agencies 1:1 Yes El No NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands State Agencies Q Yes 1:1No US Army Corp Federal Agencies [H]yes ❑No o. Zooing and Mann" infemwtfo.. 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Ves ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision 0 Site plan Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 10 2. What Is the zoning classification(s) of the site? Marine 11(MH)District 3. What is the maximum potential devekgxn ent of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Ewart'nugm"S boatyard/marina for building,storing,repairing,renting,selling or servicing boats,which may include the an accessory use'office for the sale of marine equipment or products,dockside facilities for dispensing of fuel,and 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? NA 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? NA :1 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? a Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Ya mile radius of proposed action? Multi-family and single-family residential,agricultural,abandoned industrial land uses- Zoning is R-40(I-acre single-family), RR(Resort Residential-Multi-family),Mill(Marine District-site). 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Ys mile? Yes No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a. What Is the minimum lot size proposed? NA Page 9 of 21 12/28/2005 13:17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 11 1 is 10 will proposed action require any authorization(s)for the formation of sewer or water districts? Yes ❑i No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any communityprovided p ed services(recreation, education. police, Fre protection? 91 Yes ❑Nn a. If yes, is existing Capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? IF Yes D No E: : 7 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes El No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic, DYes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be. needed to clarify your lvnicrL_IEthara ara nr mi�1,.. .,„„ a>av�.iotcJ witli yuui plupuJ', pledw ulscuss 5ucn impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I cortify that the information provided nhovn i♦is—it,i,,, 1., L ur illy knuwigUyu. Applinn„t/t�paneor Name Edward Ruff, RA fnr(.1ki-t)o Date I x'28/OS / rrD _. ._...... Signature Title Architect and Representative of Owner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, Complete the Coastal ASSESSRIerrt Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 12 On • PART 2 -PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Resporalblllly of Load Agency Gs"W&I Infomutlon(Read Carefully) I In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer Is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. I The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by slowing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But,for any specific project or site other examples and/or ower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response,thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. I The Impacts of each project,on each she,In each locality,will vary. Therefore,the examples are Illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of Impacts and thresholds to answer each question. 1 The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question- 1 In Identifying Impacts,consider long tern,short term and cumulative effects. Inetructlons(Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Mayos answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. N answering You to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact, If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example,check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that It is also necessarily siginfilicarilL Any large Impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it bs looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(*)in the project to a small to moderate Impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response Indicates that such a reduction Is not possible, This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change bnpsct on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result In a physical change to the project site? NO YES ID Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15%or greater,(15 foot Yes []No rise per 100 foot of length),or where the general slopes In the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table 13 Yes 0 No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1.000 or more ❑ Yes [7]No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or Yes [:]No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ❑s Yes [DNo Involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove Yes �No more than 1,000 tons of natural material(I.e., rock or soil)per year. Page 11 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 13 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON, • Otherimpacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there bean effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the sae?(i.e.,cliffs,dunes,geological formations,etc.) NO ❑YES Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Impect on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ❑NO O YES Exempt"that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑a ❑ ❑Yes [H]No Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of 0 ❑ ❑Yes Q No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No body, • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes E]No • Other impacts: a❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑a No Reconstruction of existing bulkhead and dredging in tidal wetlands. Removal of deteriorated shoreline protection structures Bt construction of new rip-rep shoreline stabilization structures. 4. Will Proposed Action affeIX any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10%increase or decrease In the surface area of any body of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No water or more than a 10 acre Increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No area. • Other Impacts: ❑e ❑ []Yes ONo Project calls for the creation of a naturalized lake/water feature on site. Page 12 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 14 t 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quan^Uty7 9NO ❑YES Exemptsa that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No have approval to serve proposed(project)action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ❑ ❑ ❑ye [:]No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Conatruction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ❑ ❑ ❑yes []No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge Into ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ❑ [71 ❑vas ❑No chemical products greeterthen 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ nes ❑No Page 13 of 21 12,'20,'2(3(3E; 10:17 C31 47C c003 TWO GROUP ItIG rAGC 1E 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact tie Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Cnangs 6. WIII Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns,or surface water runofr7 1:1 NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Piopoeed Action would change flood water flows ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ Ell,. CIN. Proposed Action Is Incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No floodway- Other impacts: O ❑ [-]Yes [j]No Stormwater twtoff will be oontained/recharaed on site w/sobsnrfare Rtn:rt:nes and landscaped lake/water feature. CIIuJuaLe eniawaly Ji•w•eta.emwwwr b,.ildins. A Pw.dma IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Pmpnsad Action affect air quality? ONO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips In any ❑ ❑ ❑Yea ❑No yivon hour. Proposed Action will result in the Incineration of more than 1 ton ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs.per hour ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an Increase in the amount of land ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an Increase in the density of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No industrial development within tsmslincj Industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS S. WIII Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? []NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No Federal list, using the site,over or near the site,or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 16 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change - • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑' ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Osprey nest is southeast comer of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. g. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? ONO ❑YES Ex•mpbs that would appy to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ❑ ❑ []yes ❑No or migratory fish,shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No mature forest(over 100 years of age)or other locally Important vegetation. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NPACT ON AGPOCULTURAL LAND FESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? 0 NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever,cross or limit access to ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No agricultural land(includes cropland, hayfields,posture,vineyard, orchard,etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No acres of agricultural land or,If located In an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 17 `J 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No agricultural land management systems(e.g.,subsurface drain lines.outlet ditches,strip cropping):or create a need for such measures(e.g.cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON AES1f1M RESOURCES 11. WIII Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources?(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum In Section 617.20,Appendix e.) ©NO [DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses,or project components obviously different ❑ ❑yes a No from or In sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns,whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses,or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result In the elimination or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No significant screening of scenic views known to be Important to the area.. • Other impacts: ❑ Q [Dyes Q No The site onarntiy contains abandoned,deteriorated industrial building(s)&accessory uses that will be removed,which is considered to be a significant brnitical impact. MPACT ON HBTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? [j]NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 18 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Ej NO 11YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ [:]Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVRON MENTAL Aft-AS 14, Will Proposed Action Impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area(CEA)established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? EINO DYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction In the quantity of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will result In a reduction in the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑NO resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use,function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ ❑vas ❑No resource? • Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Page 17 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 19 1 2 3 Smell to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? 0 NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No Slight increase in local traffic,impact will not be significant as per Dunn Engineering Associates review(4/2005), IMPACT ON ENEIM 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? QNO []YES Examples that would appy to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5%Increase in the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No NOISE AND COW MPACr 17. WIII there be objectionable odors, noise,or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? aNO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital,school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yea [:]No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No local ambient noise levels for raise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yea [IN, noise screen. • Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No Page 18 of 21 12128;2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 20 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change AIPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? [j]NO ❑YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No hazardous substances(i.e.oil,pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)In the event of accident or upset conditions,or there may be s chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No In any form(i.e.toxic,poisonous,highly reactive,radioactive, Irritating,infectious,etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result In the excavation or other ❑ ❑ Dyes []No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste, • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No YVACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action effect the character of the existing community? 11 NO E]YES Exempt"that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The permanent population of the city,town or village In which the Yas No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ❑ ❑ ❑yes []No services will increase by more than 5%per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [-]No structures or areas of historic Importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No services(e.g.schools,police and fire,etc.) Page 19 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ❑ Yes ❑No projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ 0 ❑s Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [:]Yes ❑No Removal of abandoned,deteriorated industrial building(s),Generation of approx 200 jobs during constr.& 100 after completion. Both considered significant benifical impacts. 20. Is there,or Is there likely to be,public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? ONO DYES If Any Action In Part 21s Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 9 Page 20 of 21 12/28/2005 13: 17 631-476-6933 TWC GROUP INC PAGE 22 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impacts)is considered to be potentially large,even if the impact(s)may be mitigated. Instructions(If you need more space,attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each Impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the Impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available,decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is Important. To answer the Question of Importance,consider: I The probability of the Impact occurring 1 The duration of the Impact I Its irreversibility,including permanently lost resources of value I Whether the impact can or will be controlled 1 The regional consequence of the impact I Its potential divergence from local needs and goals I Whether known objections to the protect relate to this impact. I 1 Page 21 of 21 r yrxr PLANNING BOARD MEMB w' O�� co * Town Hall, 53095 Main Road HENNETT ORLOWairman KI,JR. �.1. � P.O. Box 1179 Chairman = L p Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J. CREMERS y Z Fax (516) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Oy � Telephone(516) 765-1938 RICHARD G.WARD Date Received -- Date Completed PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Filing Fee TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN New kJUN _Change of UseRe-use 2 5 2003 _Extension _Revision of Approved Site Plan Southold Town Planning Board Name of Business or Site: 011,1 — b 0 1_.T1> SCTM#: 10oo- 3 g 0 7 7 i Location: Nsq� c�EA ✓t s Po/ NT Ef9-5% Mgr+oiJ y Address: Name of Applicant: Dr- , 4HZ, NkC7 Address of Applicant: / /NL`t civ pl-a Z'q� 9P7, ., VC , N y N y Telephone: Owner of Land: D K I —-)50 Tb Agent or Person responsible for application: F4Tiz (e mU0 E3E� Address: D Telephone: Site plans prepared by: _ �JVVVA?b V✓• YOV,,NC> License No. LlS 9q 3 Address00 UST CYI/v1>61 �q✓O;. P/✓L 2//e,+t>, /V/ //919/ Telephone: '7 ��7 — a 3 0 • i Pa1pe 1 Planriny Bnaru SRL Pran AppIIG;;l0i1 APPLICANTS ArFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK K}2 N k-(.2 L_L yCe2 being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at In the State of New York, and that he Is the owner of the above property, or that he is the of the (ritlei (Specify whether partnership or Coro.) which Is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the lar d which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, ras been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly Bled plan which has riot been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules end regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the Tiling of Site Plans and will comply with same; tha:the Plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be Installed In strict accordance with the tans submitte Signed (O erl Signed �C� 2NK0- !l CE/L (Partner or Cor^orate officer and Tulw Sworn to me this ( o i�l Pl4TRK3A C.MOORE Notary PubOa,Soft of New** 13affolk County-No."slow Ooaun"m ExpNes June 16.CDU S 46' Page 3 Planning Board Site Plan Application Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Zoning District Existing Use of Site mei C�YSRm Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which bullding will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. C�OLA57i� HrC�Zr(H GCJ TI> LA.JQ j', Z� (1Ni>5 N"OT�Z//l7GiTZ�L l'-�ST��✓r-�- ��-- err GG&:� /AUG 57f1G�v /�/NI�Y /Y1F�+�iVv /14C� MA7v'H-G£12 �iSi tg 4/�/ ffOL/S E /3G?A'% 8,9SiAl Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) 1 ! / ,,Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) /3/Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) s to el-19tl. Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by X Board of Appeals- Case # & date --P, �T6 x Board of Trustees Case # & date T/3,4,& /c NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date 7lS � X Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date l-A i--ec Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other AA2 Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit issued. NO ACTION(EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUC NOW MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. Site Plan Applications Public Hearings Under the current site plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval. The applicant shall now have the following options: 1 . To follow the established procedure, or 2 To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Department approval subject to the following conditions: A. The applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised' site plan application and review its conditional approval. B. the applicant agrees not to object to a new public hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans_ The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval and certifies to these terms by hislher signature below. Re: GKI-- btu LTi SCT : 1000- 33 — 0'7 - "7- 1_ .._ A cant Date nrpl.fcnN•r TRAN�AI"1'1.ONA1, bT.^,CLO3UNIi n(7pl 1112 'row11 or SoUthcld'a pude of Ethics_prvhl.bi bo c2nfi1Cl:.g of Sebe setotl trio aYl oC —i _ .CTowl g and employees, —Tile e Dur oae__o—ftjle far � Information wldch can t_ lnzliILtereataha allow take whatevor action la neceseal'r to avoid came . YOUR NANh: (Last name, f(rgt name, mld(Ile ini6ial, unlegg you ac'a apD.lylny in the name of someone nigh or oC)n�r entity, 91irI) as g Cotnpiny . Tf no, inclical:P. the other pgrSOtl 'g Or compnny' n name. ) NATIMF OF n1'V1.U.'ATl'uN: (r:•he t-)c all. L.Ita 1. •?UCIy . ) Taa. t]t le,vanCv Chango of zona . . . Approval of plat _ Exemption from plat or oCrivial rn7p Other _ (1C "ptLeC, " neat?the artivlty . ) Ile ylnl personally (or through Your company,....npouge, gibllnrl, parent, or ehl.id) have n r..l.ationsldp with any Officer nc emp Loynu of the Town of. Soutlrol(77 "/le l,atlnrlahip" inrl.11r7eg by blood, marriage, or bueineou Lntrreut_ "1111stne(lo in Leroyt.^ ncnna a bun Ltuag, toCiuding a prtrtnernhlp, in which lite town officer or employee Irne evert a partinl nvnnrOhi.p of (or employment by) a curporation in which tile town offlCer nr employee Vwae more- than 5% of the nharea. %l•:S NO TF ynu >nnvnrod "yi•a:, " cumplp,to the balance or thlw form and date ani: sign where indicated. Name OC pernnn employr:7cl by I'•hn Town of Southol(1 Title or position of that person _ -'- - Deacrib( the relationghlp betwoan yopraelf ( the applicant. ) and thn town off Iver ar employee. Ei L'hea' chuck the appropriate line A) through h) and/or describe In the apa Cn provider.. The tour. officer or employee, or hlg or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all Lhat apply), A) the owner of yceater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stook of trip. applicant (when the applicant Is a corporation); , E) the legal or benefl.cial owner of any interest ill A noncorporeto entity (whon trig applicant is rrob a corpurat{on) ; un 0(ricer, direc Lur, pal'thet, or employee of the applicanl:; ur ft) the act ll,l.l nppl i,•.r,,L. . DCSCfiil'T1UN OF RET.,ATl ONSIIID 1hini l.l,c•`I t.hls tlf dy . n tlr�l. �t.ttt j<RzuKo !14 1 OKI-DO LTD. Holistic Health Institute At Cleaves Point East Marion, Town of Southold Hotel Restaurant-Health Center Full Environmental Assessment Form Prepared By: Coastal Environmental Corporation 42 Lewis Road East Quogue, New York 11942 Jeffrey L. Seeman, CEP REM Tel. 631-653-3399 E-mail jlscoast@,optonline.net r� hY Pondd OR M, -Nat•-a - - 1 �t` �a I fiN i rt z � 4 tel'. jA� Q�dI i9 �. r33tt � Afa ion% % , � 7 a y . . U • Esq �, ' GARDYN No, is Fast Ma�wtf. 5 Mo nem`rtaat r _ R ✓ ku r D R F E rr , s r SITE - - LOCATION - Cleaves n, I3 I.inity na, 55` 3 aL 1 „yantly 6e. ; YDUftas Pt // 4 t / Pi r r 41•Yi {� a� e,0. - � . .. R. f '7 u� ( - I f r a yam•+' a �" 4 G/pp 8 fights C 0P�'tt 9 RieSplitla f / - • T wer li , Dering Iarbor k 4 -N1L 5Y• 'I 3-D TgmQusda Copyright®1999 Del.awe Yarmo,M,ME 010% Saoee Iota:iJ5(:S -- 900 ft Swale..1:22,400 Detail:13-2 Datum:W'CS3; 0 PART 1 --PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action OKI -DO LTD. Holistic Health Institute Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) SCTM # 1000-38-07-7.1 east side of Shipyard Lane, north of Gardiners Bay near Cleaves Point, East Marion,(Southold) Suffolk Count, New York Name of Applicant/Sponsor Dr. Kazuko Address I Lincoln Plaza -Apt. 24E City / PO New York City State NY Business Telephone Name of Owner (if different) Address city / PO Business Telephone Description of Action: Zip Code 10023 State Zip Code Holistic health center consisting of 125 units of transient hotel/motel (100 unitssemi- detached and 25 in one building) for lodging, parking spaces, 200 seat restaurant, ornamental ponds, office space, perforance stage, swimming pool, tennis court, gathering hall, maintenance building, I -single family dwelling (manager's house), hot baths, ornamental gardens and dredgedboat basin. Page 2 of 21 • • Please Complete Each Question --Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: ❑ Urban Industrial r.7- Commercial D Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) ® Forest Agriculture 17 Other former oyster company/commercial fish 2. Total acreage of project area: 18.7115 acres, APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) +/- 14.71 acres 0 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) +/-0.5 acres +/- 0.5 acres Water Surface Area +/- 1.0 acres +/-1.0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 1.5 acres 1.5 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces +/- 1 acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ® Well drained _% of site ❑✓ Moderately well drained 100 % of site. Poorly drained _% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? NA acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ® Yes ❑ No a. What is depth to bedrock +/- 800 ft (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: F✓ 0-10% 95% 010-15% 5 % F 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes ❑E No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes ❑ta No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-10 ft. (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? IF)Yes ® No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Q Yes 1:1 No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Oyes a No According to: Site Inspection: J. Seeman, CEP Coastal Environmental Corp. Jun. 19, 2003- may have potential for piping plover none sighted. each 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project Eyes n No coastal shoreline-seawrd of existing bulkhead cliffs, dunes, other 13. Is the project site presently used Dy me community ur neignurx ntxiu do UII UPUII �iM�c I ® Yes Fl No 14. If es, explain: Does the Dresent site include scenic views known to be important to the community? rMlyes MNo to Gardiners Bay 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: 16. a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary itseldf is LaKes, ponos, wetland areas WIImD u LUrnyuum w tnt9et.t Oita. tidal wetalnds-littoral zone along beachfront coastal shore of Gardu b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 • 11 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? R Yes ❑ No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? O Yes ❑ No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? OYes ❑No 1 a. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, Section 303 and 304? mYes rMiNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? DYes re No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑ Yes ❑i No B. Project Description 1 . Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 18.7115 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 18.7115 acres initially; 16.7115 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 2 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. NA % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 171 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 12 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately 1 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 35 max height; 120 width; 192 ft. length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? +/-927 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 1000 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed R1Yes E] No NIA a. a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? howYmotel/restaurant/holistic health center b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Eyes ❑ No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Ryes ❑ No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 15.7115 acres. Page 5 of 21 i • 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally -important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑ Yes Fal No 6. if single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 1.8 months, (including demolition) 7. If mufti -phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑ Yes ❑o No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 45 ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑ Yes ❑� No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑ Yes ❑r. No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? E] Yes ❑ No Type sanitary Wastewater 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ❑No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑ Yes ❑ No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Q Yes ❑ No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 0.4 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If yes, give name private carter ; wagon unknown d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? rMl Yes Page 6 of 21 ❑ No 0 0 e. If yes, explain: recyclables-paper,merals, plastics, etc. 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑� Yes ❑No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 0.4 tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? unk years. 10. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes ❑E No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes ONo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes R1No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? R Yes M No If yes, indicate type(s) fossil fuel, electric power, 22. if water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 18.000 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve local, State or Federal funding? ❑ Yes F No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? aYes ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment ® Zoning variance ® New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision MM Site plan a Special use permit ® Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date a Yes ®NO site plan City, Town, Village Board special permit wetlands Myes ❑ NO site plan City, Town, Village Planning Board special use permit City, Town Zoning Board E] Yes ❑ No ME ® No sanitary City, County Health Department water supply Other Local Agencies ❑ Yes ❑ No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No State Agencies ayes ® NO 1VYSDEC tidal wetlands ElYes❑No USACOE Federal Agencies wetlands/dredging C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? aYes ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑ Zoning amendment ® Zoning variance ® New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision MM Site plan a Special use permit ® Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 I. . 0 2. What is the zoning classifications) of the site? 3. 0 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning! 30 percent lot covergac 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? as is 5. What is the maximum potential development or me site it oeveiopeu ns peumuau Uy .IIFU P.,p.,x �Ul11119v 30 percent lot coverage 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? El Yes ❑ No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a A mile radius or proposed action! single family residential, condominium, agriculture, open space-Gardiners Bay 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) ization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑ Yes ❑ No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? Yes ❑ No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? M Yes ❑ No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑ Yes IF No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. E Yes ❑ No D. Infamlational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above its true/to the best of ml y knowledge. D Applicant/Syonsor Name y✓t�r��"�`k� L �i%iiA� (,,.t„��//]F/Jate 'f9sto .1 Signat Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 e uArcN 11E e \ 5p o �fI IIA s¢ SELNmo. 5 02 P a q0 ' d• 0 I • + y+ 31-M-41 O> 1• i+0 a M1 `°91 TMN U S TN D h �P• M SO < +® A 00 9 I A M1 +p P � • I4 It Ad 2 / +M1I q S qi S 5 O tq I I I � tfi qd 2 tq, Ig q IB +t +q 9 M7 a+M1 6 A I 9 I •�" O ue 10.B tS ,o�t.N' IM1+ ` I vlp 1 tg I a 10.5 m a IM1a q I IDA 10.1 10.6 •� tA. IO.l2 6 'B Iry i ti 10.1 10.11 m o f t+ I d 10.14 10.2lOP• L2A I 10.21 hq j / fig, hg./s 'x ` m.m ``t aM1 M1yy 10.17 m b AOP YYY c�O' 10.18 � {' 4 w 1&0'cl th o � t \ y • ICONOI Yhu \ „ C 11 4.0A 15 lBA X LIES(£xl y6u Ce0]. aGVES WN! 9.2A A w urt5 SEE mNJI CpC0. T t Y sc xa osu�N�n ^`� aEAv9s rox 1a�c =` Z p rta9uE 14x14 aucE co-+oa Q ism oars sa sec �m9Nx Ansu r N _ woxz aaaa� O F.Ixu o>u um ve� p0 D. 26 O• O� \.• 4.D. P.D. 65 SEE SEL m on 3 4' SEE SEL N0. IM SEE SEL W. 132 � a - xs E—__ —_ X99.., EN•�.1 .1. xa «*• NOTICE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © E Toms SOUTHOLD SECTION NO T. 01x0 DIST G �„ —�— x. 121) 2 _ _ _ _ --' .-- - . ^. NCTs. usNlE. uUUTs s.E Da -_ �y Red Property Tax Service Agency Y pj1 » Ius¢ a n 7A �i fn�1 [en1 PnrlxuLN Y 11901 ,x, ..., 1 3('+ffir.gx..: : *� ��'%! .-`S6NMl ;._ „0.. n.-. Ln ,..:.3 .� .': ' t�-•.s;,. ^'f .,,r .-..a.-.... ..�.^eY�A.. N.rcxz� lrc FOR VCl.N0. e SEE SEC. N0. • O , '♦ Il-OB-OffiI • d' y bO ♦ M1 { ♦ TWN W SWTegLO M1 yp• +• a yA� d ' f CA ♦{ 9 { O A> 1 O ® e r � a a ♦ 10.1 s+� m ♦d,�a d 'NAr �a 6 a w 10.8 +N d r .n 10.5. 10.9w 1N efM1�' d qNa ]O.f 10.1 °f d 10.13 ♦ rdM1N by M1 w i .i. 10.1 10.13 10.33 q. ♦� \9 { / � M1p . ;� 10.0 13.3q 10.21 ♦ ,P i / ry+!� ..F .2+ ' 10.15 �J5 CO w i `,d �I♦ ,3�M1� Y'Y y { tB.m ski. w O.I6 O'10.1T 10.19I�b � 71-1J b 2s4\ c 9 b 3EN f tcuNlx u2uY� 11 13 D I.OR y5 ' LB. \ 9.3. r OS52Nr YNLN CaC6 0.C�NVF'SL 6M WIS SEE _ imunx Bau uaii.�az<a�wa p O iEm Wtt m sec �cWBx ucu A `•N 9 b0IS36L MI © O IfON Wtt SEE YG N0 F,a• 2B Na 1sz xaa n � O• P.D. 65 SEE SEC. N0. OT 9 W SEE SEC. N0. 133 _� = e (211 .b �. 2 Q owrN or�mL nu "` a' "� NR[aEnr[s oS.B x:rs- Nonce NwrExW¢ �lrEur N ON COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © DC Red Property Tax Service Agency E Y v t SECTION NO ITM SOU:THOLD n m o n R _ __ —_ y •a .....—.. -suE fa�f Cu.fy Plv✓1ra1M 1 11901 Y •Town Of Southold 11 P.O Box 1179 • �V O Southold, NY 11971 ***RECEIPT*** Date: 03/15/07 Receipt#: 1417 Transaction(s): Reference Subtotal 1 1 Seqra Review 38-7-7.1 $882.92 Check#: 1417 Total Paid: $882.92 Name: Oki -do, Ltd Dr. Kasuko Tatsumura Hillyer 1 Lincoln Plaza Ny, NY 10023 Clerk ID: LYNDAB z .d MAR 1 6 2007 Internal 10: 38-7-7.1 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk From: Planning Department Date: March 13, 2007 Re: Checks MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (car. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 Enclosed herewith is/are the check(s) listed. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Name & Type Tax Map # Amount Date of Check GAIA Holistic Ctr. 38-7-71 $882.92 add'I SEQ 3/6/07 LR encs. • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk From: Planning Department Date: March 13, 2007 Re: Checks MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Enclosed herewith is/are the check(s) listed. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Name & Type Tax Map # Amount Date of Check GAIA Holistic Ctr. 38-7-7.1 $882.92 add'I SEQ 3/6/07 OK6-130 LTD. 1417 y LR _7 oAri,L`L� G encs.P, IFIL �� p7� ./ nhatti �{ �Z ?.— ----- dam- The Chase Maan Bank 1 �. W '' `"` i Li oln Plaza Plea \ NV I'M23 - � 38 7- .7 17 (— 1:0 2 LOO oil': L F. Silo �4i7 • Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 46 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 12/15/06 Receipt#: 5623 Transaction(s): Reference Subtotal 1 1 Seqra Review 38-7-7.1 $850.00 Check#: 5623 Total Paid: $850.00 Name: Gaia, Holistic Center Sp C/o Pat Moore 51020 Main Rd Southold, NY 11971 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID: 38-7-7.1 • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk From: Planning Department Date: December 1. 2006 Re: Checks 11 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Enclosed herewith are the checks listed below. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Name & Type Tax Map # Amount Date of Check Goia Holistic Center SP 38-7-7.1 $850 SEQRA 7/27/06 Orlowski Hardware Co. SP 140-3-3.4 $783 supp.app.fee 1 12/11/06 LR enc. Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 ` Southold, NY 11971 ***RECEIPT*** Date: 07/16/03 Receipt#: 0 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $5,400.00 Check#: 1718 Total Paid: $5,400.00 Name: Oki -do, Ltd Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY 11939 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Internal ID: 79370 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 07/16/03 Receipt#: Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $4,820.60 Cash#: 1545 Total Paid: $4,820.60 Name: Oki -do, Ltd Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY 11939 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Internal ID: 79372 Iheithot0 dos. state. ny.us (518) 473-3355 www.dos.state.ny.us Fax: (518) 474-6572 Butt-Otruba-O'Cn-nnr Arch0rPcts Edward P. Butt, AIA Principal 1062 Northern Blvd- Email: Rosivn. NY 11576 ebuu'A'buttmruba.com Tel: j5 16) 625-6625 Fax: G 16) 625-6629 Butt-Otruba-O'Connor Architects Danita Otruba-O'Connor, .'JA Princip.,i rt.• Architect -Feng Shui Consuhcnt 1062 Northern Blvd. Email: Roslyn, NY 11576 douvbaCabuttotruba.com rel (516)6_5-6625 Fax: (516)625-6629 LORI HEITHOFF, AICP Land Use Training Manager State of DEPARTMENT OF STATE New York Division of Local Government 41 State Street Albany, NY 12231-0001 Iheithot0 dos. state. ny.us (518) 473-3355 www.dos.state.ny.us Fax: (518) 474-6572 Butt-Otruba-O'Cn-nnr Arch0rPcts Edward P. Butt, AIA Principal 1062 Northern Blvd- Email: Rosivn. NY 11576 ebuu'A'buttmruba.com Tel: j5 16) 625-6625 Fax: G 16) 625-6629 Butt-Otruba-O'Connor Architects Danita Otruba-O'Connor, .'JA Princip.,i rt.• Architect -Feng Shui Consuhcnt 1062 Northern Blvd. Email: Roslyn, NY 11576 douvbaCabuttotruba.com rel (516)6_5-6625 Fax: (516)625-6629 lb COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 0 GILBERT ANDERSON, P.E. CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Town of Southold Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971-0957 Attn: Jerilyn Woodhouse STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS LOUIS CALDERONE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SeptemTier 29; 2006. «w -,. _.. Re: 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard L>1 TilfT1St*Marion._ _ Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki -Do Ltd. SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Dear Ms. Woodhouse This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for this proposed development. Since this proposed development is not adjacent to a County maintained road and subsequently not under our jurisdiction, a permit from this Department is not required. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-4100. WH:MPC:ln Very truly yours, William Hillman, P.E. Chief Engineer By: M. Paul Campagnol Director of Highway Planning & Permits SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER (631)852-4010 335 YAPHANK AVENUE 0 YAPHANK, N.Y. 1 1980 0 FAX(631)852-4150 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND September 26, 2006 F7 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Shawn Kiernan Division of Coastal Resources New York State Department of State 41 State Street Albany, New York 12231-0001 RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Kiernan: In addition to the attached SEQRA documentation (Resolution, EAF Part 1 & 2 and Positive Declaration), please find enclosed a preliminary site plan for the above referenced project. This office does not currently have an extra copy of the newest site plan to refer to you, however, an older proposed site plan and architectural plans have been enclosed so that your office can better familiarize itself with this project. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, Amy rd Senior Planner Cc: File Encs: SEQRA information (resolution, EAF Part 1 &2 and Positive Declaration) 1 site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised December 28, 2005. 1 architectural plan prepared byButt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised December 28, 2005 LJ MAILING ADDRESS: OF SQ�� P.O. Box 11 79 H O/ Southold, NY 111 971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex O 54375 State Route 25 • OIy (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) COUMV,� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Shawn Kiernan Division of Coastal Resources New York State Department of State 41 State Street Albany, New York 12231-0001 RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Kiernan: In addition to the attached SEQRA documentation (Resolution, EAF Part 1 & 2 and Positive Declaration), please find enclosed a preliminary site plan for the above referenced project. This office does not currently have an extra copy of the newest site plan to refer to you, however, an older proposed site plan and architectural plans have been enclosed so that your office can better familiarize itself with this project. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, Amy rd Senior Planner Cc: File Encs: SEQRA information (resolution, EAF Part 1 &2 and Positive Declaration) 1 site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised December 28, 2005. 1 architectural plan prepared byButt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised December 28, 2005 M7 g� NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL, PLANNING, CONSULTING PH: (631) 427.6665 572 waft Whitman Road FAX (631) 4273620 Mekiiie, NY 11747 TO: Bruno Semon Southold Town Hall Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 We are sending you: For Your. 1 Date: 26 -Sep -06 Re: Gaia Holistic Center Job M 03261 Under separate cover X Herewith By Messenger Review & Comment Approval As requested x For your review Bid Submission Remarks: Dear Mr. Semon: Please find the enclgsed ruatenall s i t i�ssa' DaBreo's request. Please do,pgt a y questions or need further assistance. LVVV I� f) 1 1 �j94 id � Pizr.1 r.r ::,a Sincerely, s =°tiM1w uta `"' NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC By: Ashley Marciszyn x215 cc: File PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific projector site other examples and/or lower thresholds maybe appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. I The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. ! In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. Page 11 of 21 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO ❑ YES ❑ Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ❑❑ Yes ❑ No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes [:]No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ❑ Fw� Yes ❑ No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No Other impacts: ❑ ❑ QYes [:]No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) 7 N 17 YES Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No F-1 NO F7 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of ❑❑ a Yes ❑ No a protected stream. ❑ `❑Yes ❑ No • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non -protected existing or new body of water? ❑NO YES Examples Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ❑ ❑ ❑Yes FIN o area. • Other impacts: ❑ `❑Yes ❑ No Construction of pond system requiring proper design considerations and possible NYSDEC permit Page 12 of 21 0 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? 7 N YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1, 100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact impact Project Change ❑ ❑E ❑Yes F!]No ❑ ❑ E] Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 7 N © ❑ F1Yes ❑No ❑ 0 ❑e Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ H1 ❑ Yes 7 No ❑ 0 EYes ❑No ❑E ❑ 7Yes 7 N ❑ E] ❑Yes No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No ❑ ❑e ❑Yes ❑ No 0 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage Flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? 7 N ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. • Other impacts: 0 1 2 Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ 0 '❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 7 N ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑e Eyes ❑No Large scale grading and development proximate to wetlands and surface water IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ❑ ❑ F-1 Yes ❑ No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? 7 N ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No Development and disturbance of vegetation in proximity to surface water and wetlands 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non -threatened or non - 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ❑' ❑ Eyes ❑ No other than for agricultural purposes. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of❑ ❑ • Other impacts: ❑' ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Development and disturbance of vegetation in proximity to surface water and wetlands 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non -threatened or non - endangered species? 7 N ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No or migratory fish, shellfish orwildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of❑ ❑ .❑Yes ❑ No mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑' Yes []No Potential ecological impacts should be assessed IMYAG I UN AURIGULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑ NO ❑ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ED No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) ❑NO 7YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different❑ a❑Yes ❑ No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑❑ 0 Yes ❑ No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ❑ ❑QYes ❑ No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ❑NO 7YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes []No ❑' ❑ '❑ Yes ❑ No • Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change ❑ ❑ Eyes 11 No Potential impact to archaeological resources must be assessed abd mitigated IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? ❑ NO 7YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No • Other impacts: ❑� ❑ 7Yes 1:1 No Change in land use and open space character in area of public road and water access location IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? 7 N ❑YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No resource? • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes [--]No Page 17 of 21 0 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ❑ NO 0 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. • Other imnacts IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ❑NO .❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. 0 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Q ❑ QYes [--]No ❑ '❑ QYes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ []Yes []No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑Yes [:]No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No ❑' ❑ El Yes ❑ No ❑' ❑ E Yes ❑ No 11 l-1 r-1.. n. ther impacts: I- LJ "Yes "No Page 18 of 21 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? 7 N 7YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) Page 19 of 21 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ 1 2 3 ❑ []Yes Small to Potential Can Impact Be ❑e Yes Moderate Large Mitigated by ❑Yes Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 11 No 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ❑NO ❑YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes' ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? 7 N 7YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) Page 19 of 21 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ []Yes 1:1 No ❑ ❑e Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No E ❑ 7Yes 11 No 20. Is th ire, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? ❑NO .7 YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑ No projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No ire, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? ❑NO .7 YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 SEP -22-2006 it�:40 NELSON HNLi POPE r 631 425 1257 P.01 • Sw3f' NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL - PLANNING • OONBULTINO 778 WALT WHPI FCAU. ii ELVLL . M 11747 - 2192 427-6066 FAX (2311 427 -ft= npvmnaloanpopa.com FAX COVES SHEET To: Amy Town of Southold Planning Department Phone: Fac: 631-765-3136 From: Marissa Date: September 22, 2006 Re: Laid X 04sew Center No. of Pages: 1 (including Cover) Comments: Arra:, a signed F.AF page is attached. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thank you. � S L, t SEP 2 5 2006 l SEP -22-2006 _5;41 NELSON ;,ND POPE E.'.<_ 425 1257 P.02 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpase: The full EAF is dasigned to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. frequently, there are aspects of a protect that are subjective or unmeasurable. Its also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area Pray not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of signiticance. The fUh EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has tfen orderly, comorenanaive in nature. yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The Full EAF Is cempnsed of three parts: Part 1; grog ides odjective data and information about a given project and its site. By Identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on icentiFying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether as impact Is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially -large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3• if any impact In Part 2 is identified as potentially -large, then part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 11 Part 1 O Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon reviaw of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and ccnsldering both the magnitude acid importance of each onloact, it is reasorably determined by the lead agency thar. L.__l A. The project will not result In any large and Important impeet(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. d. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will nut be a significant effect for this Unllst0 Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.` 0 C. The project may resuwt it ore or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the ervkonrnern, the-efore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Pogo 1 of 21 SEP 2 5 2006 TOTAL P.02 SEP-1S-20Fffi _ "'•46 NEL50N AND POPE 631 425 1257 P.01 NELSON POPE & VOORHON LLC � AMC SAI' ENVIRaNMENTAL 1 PLANNING CONSULTING AL 572 WT WMITPLYN RCAF MEV 9LL6. NY 11747 - 21 ie tW 17 ap,•SBBS ?a+( (83'1) f27-0660 npv&naleonpapnccm FAX COVER SHEET To: AinY Town of Southold Phone: Fax: 631-765-3136 From: Marissa Date: September 19, 2006 Re: Gaia HoAuk Circle Pan H EAF 1 No. of Pages: 1r (including Cover) Comments: Amy, I spoke to Bruno yesterday afternoon and he asked me to fax the attached to you. I sent the same by email earlier and a hard copy will be in the mail later today. Feel free to call if you have questions. Thank you. S'F FIB RLS WF Mf SEP -15+-2006 '2;-10 HELSi_IN : ND POPE PART 2-•oJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsisilfty of Lead Agency 631 4251257 P.02 L3enerel Information iReao Carefully) I In competing the term tre reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expectod to be an expert environmental analyst_ I The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response In column 2, The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations, But, for any speck project or site other examples and/or lower threaholds maybe appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation In Part 3. The impacts of each p1ojeot, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are Illustrative and have been offered as guidance. Tray do not constitute an axhaustiv'e list of impacts and thregil lda to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. Ir idantify ng impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. instructions, (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2, Answer Yes 0 there will be any impact. b. Maya answers should ds considered as Yes answers. d. If answering YesM a questior then oheckthe appropriate ncx(oolumn 1 or 2)to indicate the potential site of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided. check column 2. if impactwll occur but threshold is lower then example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it's also necessarily algnflilco d Any !ergo Impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact In column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. It a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by uharge(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact. also check the Yea hex in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3, Page 11 of 21 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change impact oilLAnd 1. 'Hill the Proposed Action result in is physical change to the project Ste-, NO YE$FJ Examplat that wou_d apply to column 2© Yes ❑ No • Any consiructionorslopes of15%orgreater. (15foot rise per 100 foot of length i, or where the general slopes In the project area exceed 10%, • Construction onlane where the depth toore waterteble Q ❑ F] Yes ONO is less tram 3 foot. - Construction o° paved paddng area for 1.000 or more ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes [:]No generally within j feet of existing ground surface. I Q ❑ Q Yes []No • construction til continue for more than year of Involve more :han one phase or stage • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e.. rock or soil) per year. Page 11 of 21 EEP— � 9-2W36 ..2:41 NELSON NNL POPE • Corstruchon crexpansion of a samary iandflll. Corstruchon In a designated floodway, ]ther imoacts' 2, Will there be an sffecttc any unique or unusual land Corms',ound on tre site',l,w, sifts, dunes, geologioal formations, etc.) ©NC r7,YES Snecifc.and farms 031 —25 125? P.03 • 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impala Impact Project Change 0 F-1 Dyes ©No Impact on Water ❑ ©Yes ON. © ©Yes ©No QYOe ENO 0 F-1 Dyes ©No Impact on Water 3 Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protectec i (Under Articles 15, 24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law Q © Yes D No ECL) CNO YES M []Yea ©No Examplaa the:. would apply to oolumn 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. © ❑ ©Yes ©Nc • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from Channel of 00 QYes ❑ No a protectea stream. Constructioo of pond system requinng proper design considerations and possible NYSDEC Pamir • Extansion of utility distribution fac litiss through a protected water nYes No body. • Construction it a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. El Yes E]Ne rlthar minacts 1:1 Yes © No 4. Will Proposed Action affect any, non•prctectrid axlstng or new hotly of waterl MNO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease In the surface area of any body of Q © Yes D No water or more than a 10 acre Ircraase 4r decrease. • Construction of a bony of Nater that exceeds 10 acres of surface M []Yea ©No area. • Other impacts Yes 1:1 No Constructioo of pond system requinng proper design considerations and possible NYSDEC Pamir Page 12 of 21 SEP -19-2006 _=.41 NELSON RNLI POPE • 5, wtu Proposed Action affect surface or groundwaterquality or quant. ? INC YES eumplea that would apply to column 2 • Proposed AC Jdr wit recuire a oischarye permit. • Proposed ACion requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed!projecl) action. • Proposed Action requi'oa water supply from wells with greater !hall 45 gallons per minute pumping Capacity. • Construction or operation causing any conlamination of a water supply System, • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater, • Liquid effluent will be cor.veyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have Inadequate capaci.y- • Proposed Action woJld Lee water in axoess of 20,000 gallons perday. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual cont astto nat•«ral conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of patroleum or chemical products greater than 1.100 gallons. • proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without waver and/or sewer services. • Proposed .Action locates commercial, and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment endfor storage facilities. other impacts Page 13 of 21 631 425 Sts' P.O4 • 2 3 Small to Poterbal Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 11 O []Yea EjNo 7 11 yea ©No 0 Yes No ©Yes No El L_J QYes No © © QYes ©No © 0 © Yes El No 21 Yes No EYES NO ©Yes ElNo E© Yes I: No LI Q EY" iI No .SEP -19-2006 _2:42 NELSON RND POPE • 6. Will Proposed Acton alter drairage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ©NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to "li imn 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Aalon may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns Proposed Action will allow development in a designatod floi. other imdaets: 631 425 1257 P.05 1 Small to • 2 Potential 3 Can Impact Be Moderate Impact Large Impact Mitigated by Project Change ❑ © ❑Yes ❑ No 7. Wil! Proposed Action affect air quslity9 ©NO MYES [j]Yes []NO []Yes []NO ❑ ❑ E] Yes I❑No ❑ 0 ❑Yea ❑No .arge state grading and development proximate to wetlands and surface water IMPACT ON AIR 7. Wil! Proposed Action affect air quslity9 ©NO MYES Examples that wound apply to column 2 • Proposed Action wi;l induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ❑ ❑ []Yes I❑No given hour. • Proposes Action will results tno incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per how. • Emission rot- Qf total contaminants w exceed 6 lbs, per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑Yes [:1 No ❑No hour. • Proposed Acton will allow ar increase in the amount of land ❑ El El ❑Yes ❑No committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of Q ❑ ❑Yes © No industrial development within exist ig irdustris i areas. nrhorimnacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yea —]No IMPACT ON PIANT5 AND ANIMALAS 8, Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species0 ONO AYES Examples that would apPiY to column 2 • Red uctian of one or mare species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. Page 14 of 2' ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑Nc SEF-1.9-2006 _2;42... NELSON FNL POPE _ 631 425 12`7 P.06 • • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate large Mitigated by Impact impact Project Change • Removai cf any port cn of a critical or significant widl'!fe habitat. F7 ❑ Dyes ❑ No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, C' ❑ FlYes []No ocher than for agrlantural purposes. LJ QYes No • other lmpacts� Development and disturbance cf vegetation in proximity to surface water and wetlands g Will Proposed Action substantially affect nor-threatened or non- endangered species? ❑NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ []Yes ❑ No • 'Proposed Action world substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish orwildlifa species • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of I❑ ❑ ❑a Yes ❑ No mature forest (over 100 years of age) or otherlocally important vagetaticit' II::11 t=J ❑ [Eyes ❑No • Other im pacts Potential ecnlogicat impacts should be assessed Y IMPACT ON AORKXA.TURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. WTProposed Action affect agricultural land resources7 no NO ❑YES Examples the*. would apply to column 2 limit to ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑ No • The Proposed Action woule &ever, cross or access agricultural land tmcluces cropland, hayfields, pasture vineyard, oronard, etc.) • Constructon activity would excavate or compactthe soil profile of ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The Proposed Aoiior would irreversibly convert more than 10 ❑ ❑ Ely" ❑ No acres or all cultural land at,, if locates ".n an Agricultural Oistrict, more than 26 acres of agricultural lane. Page 16 of 21 SEP --'_9-2006 -.2:43 NELSON AND POPE • The Proposee Action world dis'upt in, prevent Installation of agrInAtural lana management systems (eg.. subsurface drain lines, cutlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due tc increased runoff) Athan imn*nte' 631 425 1257 P.07 ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES • 1 2 3 Small to Potentia. Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change from or in sharp contrast to current aurrounding land use ❑ (]yes []No ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES I Wil Proposed Action affect aaatheDa resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Adder tum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) [7NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed and uses, or project components obviously different © 0 E]Yes []No from or in sharp contrast to current aurrounding land use patterns, wristlet man -mace or natural. ❑ ❑ Q No • Proposed lana uses, or project components visible to users w ❑ a❑ [Eyes []No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoymert of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • project ocmponents-hat will result intheelimination or significant screening of scenio views Known to be important to ❑ ❑e QYes ❑No the area. • Other imoaata ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HWrORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Vi ll Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic. Prehistoric or paleontological irnpodance? f7 NO ❑s YES Examples that would apply to columr, 2 ❑ ❑ Q No • Proposed Action occurring wholly orpardallywithin or Yes substantially cortiguous to arty `evilly or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any Impar: to an archaeological site or fossil bed tocaled wil ® © ❑ Yes ❑ No the project site. 0 ❑ Yes ❑ No • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for arahasoldpid8� sites oa the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 SEP—:9-2006 _-;43 NELKH qND POPE ❑ E31 425 :257 P.08 ❑No 1 02 3 ❑ Yes Small to Potential Can Impact Ba Moderate large Mitigated by ❑ Impact Impact, Project Change • Other impacts. Q ❑ [j]Yes ❑No Potential impact to archaeeiogicai resources must be assessed abd mitigated IMPACT ON OPEN WAGE AND RECREATION ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 13. WliI proposed Acfon affect the quantity or auaLty of existing or future ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No coon spaces or recreational opportunities? ❑ NOr❑YES ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO Examplea shat would apply to column 2 • The oemnanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ F] Yes ❑No • A Mair reduction of an open space important to the cc mmunity. ❑ © ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: el ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Chatigo in land use and open space character in urea of public road and water access location IMPACT ON CRITICAL EWRONhENTALAREAS 14. WdlProposed Aoziorimpact the exceptional orunique characteriatics of a critical environmental area (CEA) astabiisnsel pursuant to sundivis on BNYCRR 617 14(g)? E] NO ❑YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of Examples thetwould apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate Within the CEA? ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposeo Acton will result in a reduction in the puantity of the ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No resource? • Proposac Action will result in a raducton in the quailty of the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO resource? • Proposed Action wlllImpact the use, function orenjoyment ofthe ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No resource? • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes El No Page 17 of 21 SEP -19-2036 1245 NELSi iN ANL) POPE CJ 631 425 1257 P.09 • S. WN there be an effec::o existing transportation syetems? • El No Q 1 2 3 E Small to Potential van Impact Be : 1 i,J Moderate Large Mitigated by goods. Impact Impaa Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION CJ [-1 Yes [:1 No ❑ S. WN there be an effec::o existing transportation syetems? ❑Yes El No Q © ❑ NO Fe YES ❑ No E © Eyes Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of presert patterns of movement of people and/or : 1 i,J ❑❑Yes 11 Yea 0 N goods. • PropcsedAction w,iiresult inmajor traffic problems. Yes 0 N • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes 11 No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the commumi ,'a sources of fuel or energy supply? ❑ NC FJ YES Exle mples that would apply to colamn 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than u`ro increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. • ?roposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. WI there be objectionable ocors. noise, or vibration as a resuft of the PropOsec Action? ❑ NO ❑e YES Examples that would apply to c0111yn 2 • Setting within 1,570 fest of a hospital. school or other sensitive facility. • Odorsw,l oocurrcutinely (mom then one hour per day). • Proposes Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise lill for noise OutslJe Of et uctureS • Proposal Action will remove natural barlers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts' Page 18 of 21 © 1r.-1 []Yes []No ❑ 0 Dyes ❑No ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No Q CJ [-1 Yes [:1 No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No Q © QYes ❑ No E © Eyes [I No El ❑ 11 Yea ❑No SEP—:9-2008 _2:a4 NELSON HND POPE IMPACT ON PL13UC HEALTH 16. Will Proposed Action aftect public haaW and safety? ❑ NO I YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or 'elease of hazardous Substances (Ie. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in toe event of acddent or upset conditions. of there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in tae burial Of "hazardous wastes' in any form ().a. toxic, poisonous, highly resolve, radioactive, irritating, Ii ectious, etc.) • Storage facilities Far one million or more gallons of Iiquebed natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 fast of a site used for the disposal of Wild or hazardous waste. • Otherimoacts'. E7' 425 125" P.10 1 •[ P Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact 'mpact Project mange 0 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []NO ❑ © ❑Yee ❑No © ❑ ❑Yas []NO ❑ © ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OFCOMMUNTYORNEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the chersoterofthe existing communiV ❑NO ©. YE8 Wmplea that would apply tc column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project Is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. LJ ❑ (^I []Yes ❑ No • The rnuniclpal budget for capital expendilurea or operating ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 13 No services wl lincrease by more than 5% per year as a resah or this project, • Proposed Action will conflict Mr. officially adopted plans or ❑ ❑ R LJ^1Yes ENO goals. • Proposed Action wo. cause a change in the density of land use. . t I'.1 ❑ Eyes ❑ No • Propoeee Action w 1 replace oreiminate, existing facilities, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ©Ne structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development wil'. create a demand for additional community ❑ TYas ONO services re 9. schools, poll_e and (1re, etc.) Page 19 of 21 gEF—'9-2UO6 .�:44 NELSSGd HNE, POPE • • Proposed Action will set an important p'soadentfor tl projects. • Proposed AotWn will aeate Or eliminate employment. Other !M62ttS ' 20. Is them, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potennai adverse environment impacts? M-40 L,IYES 1 Small to Moderate Impact 0 63'.. 425 i1 57 P.11 • 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change []Yes ONO ©Yes 0 N ❑Yes ❑No It Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Largo Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnlhrde of Impart, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 TOTAL P.11 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND September 12, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 41 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631765-3136 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki -Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M -ll, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 11, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1, and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiated the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i); and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board assumed lead agency for this Type I action; be it therefore 6 GAIA Holistic Circle (OKI -DO) Page Two 0 September 12, 2006 RESOLVED, on September 11, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has reviewed the project and prepared a determination of significance; and be it further RESOLVED, that because the proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment the Town of Southold Planning Board hereby adopts a Positive Declaration for the proposed action; and be it further RESOLVED, that pursuant to Article 617.8, scoping will be required for the action; and be it further RESOLVED, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the 6NYCC, Part 617 State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs incurred for the review and website posting of the draft and final Environmental Impact Statements by the Town of Southold. Enclosed is a copy of the Positive Declaration dated September 11, 2006 for your records. Additionally, as indicated above, scoping shall be required for the action. Please provide a draft scope for distribution to all involved agencies. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Please find attached a copy of Part I and II of the Full Environmental Assessment Form for your review. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, 91(_�4_1_1e�� enlyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Enc. Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Commissioner, NYS DEC New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Architectural Review Committee Army Corps of Engineers Suffolk County Department of Public Works File t TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Determination of Significance Notice of Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Town of Southold Planning Board Contact: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: September 11, 2006 This notice is issued pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review — SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and Chapter 44 of the Town Code of the Town of Southold. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will have a significant effect on the environment. This determination provides a description of the proposed project and outlines the considerations of the Board in making this determination: Title of Action: GAIA Holistic Circle — Oki -Do East Marion, New York SEQR Status: Type 1 Location: The subject property lies in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, New York. The subject property consists of an 18.7± acre parcel located on the east side of Shipyard Lane, immediately west of the terminus of the Cleave Point Road right of way. The parcel contains approximately 927 feet of frontage on Shipyard Lane, 50 feet of frontage on the Cleave Point Road right of way, and approximately 920 feet of frontage along Gardiners Bay. The site is currently zoned Marine II (M-2) District. SCTM No.: 1000-38-07-7.1 • Determination of Significance } Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion, Southold Site Plan Application Brief Description of the Proposed Action: The proposed action requires a special exception and site plan to construct a holistic health center with a total of 114 transient motel rooms consisting of 23 guest lodges totaling 87 accessory motel units (14 lodges containing 3 unit motel rooms & 9 guest lodges containing 5 unit motel rooms). The remaining 27 motel units are to be located in the main spa building along with a 185 seat restaurant (103 private guest seats, 72 public guest seats), 10 public bar seats, office space, retail gift shop, 27 personal service treatment suites and accessory uses. The proposed action also involves a 3,864 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 private guest seats and a covered 758 sq. ft. deck, 1,987 sq. ft. manager's residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, pool, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building, a sanitary waste treatment facility, 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos, man-made water features, replacement of the existing bulkhead, dredging of the 16 slip private marina basin, and various outdoor amenities on a 18.7 acre parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. A parking area containing 162 spaces is proposed along the length of the western property line and extending into the northwest portion of the site. A total of 27 stalls will be landbanked for future parking area expansion. The practicality and adequacy of the proposed parking lot location is not known at this time, and may vary based on the proposed site uses and duration of guest stay. Three (3) ingress/egress points are proposed along Shipyard Lane. An additional gated ingress/egress point is proposed from Cleaves Point Road along the eastern property boundary. A loading dock will be provided at the transient hotel building and will be accessible from the proposed access point located at the southwestern corner of the property. A 20 -foot wide interior, gravel roadway is proposed along the northern and eastern property line to connect the parking lot area to the Cleave Point Road entrance. It is not known if the Cleave Point Road access will be utilized for emergency access only, or if this access will be utilized for through traffic and maintenance vehicles. Ornamental landscaping is proposed throughout the site, including the required minimum twenty -foot buffer of supplemental landscaping and natural vegetation maintained along the eastern and northern property perimeters and required minimum 15 -foot buffer is proposed along the western property line. The proposed project also includes repairing/replacing the existing wooden bulkhead that extends along the western half of the boat basin and adding boat slips along a new dock. This portion of the bulkhead is in fair to poor condition. The wooden bulkhead indicated on the Site Plan along the southwest property boundary fronting Gardiners Bay is dilapidated and no longer functioning. This portion of bulkhead will be replaced with a rock revetment to match that located on the adjacent Cleaves Point Village property. Information regarding NYSDEC jurisdiction and permitting is discussed in the Wetlands section below. Any dredging or removal of fill from the access channel or the boat basin will require acquisition of all the applicable permits from the Town Board of Trustees, the Army Corps of Engineers, the NYSDEC, and the NYS Department of State (discussed in the Wetlands section below). A large manmade pond, containing a landscaped island, several recreational bridges and wooden decks are proposed in the central portion of the property. The water feature will be accessible from several different paths throughout the site and will be surrounded by Japanese Gardens and native landscaping. A drainage system of catch basins, leaching pools and piping is proposed throughout the site. A wastewater treatment facility is proposed for the northwest corner of the site. However, no sanitary calculations are provided in the plans. Additionally, a series of leaching pools and catch basins are proposed for Cleaves Point Road, in the vicinity of the proposed entrance. The proposed density and design will be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Page 2 of 6 • Determination of Significance • Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion, Southold Site Plan Application Reasons Supporting This Determination: 1. The site has been evaluated in accordance with the Criteria for Determining Significance as contained in SEQRA 6NYCRR Part 617.7 (c). The proposed action has been evaluated through review of the following materials: • Site and architectural plan and architectural elevation drawing prepared by Butt, Otruba- O'Connor Architects, • Part I and II of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), • Site plan application, • Traffic Impact Study prepared by Dunn Engineering, • Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Report prepared by Longshore Environmental, • Site plan use diagram, • Informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects, • Independent site inspection, • Planning Board deliberation on materials supplied by the applicant, the consultant, and planning staff. Based upon this thorough review, the Planning Board identified potential significant adverse environmental impacts in connection with the proposed project. Additional supporting findings are provided below. 2. The Criteria for Determining Significance are specifically evaluated with respect to this action, as follows: a. Substantial adverse change in existing ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels; increase in solid waste production; leaching or drainage problems. The proposed action may significantly change the subject site such groundwater or surface water quality, traffic, noise levels, solid waste production, leaching or drainage problems may occur. Insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess these impacts. b. The removal or destruction of large quantities of vegetation or other significant adverse impact to natural resources. The NYS Heritage Program Database Records indicates there are no known rare species or ecological communities located within the project area; however, historical and recent records indicate the presence of several threatened and endangered vascular plants and birds in the vicinity of the project site. c. The impairment of the environmental characteristics of a Critical Environmental Area as designated pursuant to subdivision 617.14(g). The EAF indicates that the subject site is not located within a Critical Environmental Area (CEA). However, due to the site's location on Gardiners Bay / Orient Harbor, potential significant adverse impacts were identified as a result of the proposed project, particularly as it relates to water quality, harbor use and scenic resources. Page 3 of 6 • Determination of Significance • Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion, Southold Site Plan Application 11 d. The creation of a material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. The proposed project had a preliminary evaluation in terms of land use, zoning, and land use plans that establish a community's plans and goals. The overall size and scope of the project appears to be in conflict with adjoining land uses and zoning. The project's consistency with the East Marion Hamlet Study, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, State Coastal Management Program, etc. should also be evaluated. e. The impairment of the character or quality of important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood character. NYS OPRHP has noted that the area of the proposed project has not been comprehensively surveyed and recommended that a Phase I archeological survey be conducted unless sufficient evidence of substantial prior ground disturbance can be documented. f. A major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy. The proposed project involves a significant increase in energy use. Impacts to local facilities should be analyzed. g. The creation of a hazard to human health. The proposed project may result in unsafe pedestrian movement throughout the site in addition to use of public streets for site operations. h. A substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses. The proposed project significantly increases the intensity of use on the site, resulting in potential adverse impacts to traffic, sanitary and water generation use, water quality, noise and visual resources, as well as community character. The encouraging or attracting of a large number of people to a place or places for more than a few days, compared to the number of people who would come to such place absent the action. It is expected that the proposed action would attract a significant number of people for more than a few days; however, proposed site uses, possible public access to site facilities like the restaurants and duration ofguest stay have not been specified. The creation of a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above consequences. The proposed project is not expected to create a material demand for other actions that would exacerbate or create other impacts. k. Changes in two or more elements of the environment, no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the environment. Page 4 of 6 V • Determination of Significance 0 Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion, Southold Site Plan Application The proposed project does propose a significant physical site alteration and the intensity of proposed use may have combined adverse impacts on the environment. Two or more related actions undertaken, funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria. There are no other pending projects in the vicinity of the project site which when considered cumulatively with the proposed project would result in signiftcant adverse environmental impacts. 3. The site's sensitive waterfront location and area resources may be affected by the proposed project and insufficient information has been provided in which to accurately assess significant environmental impacts that may be associated with the proposed project. Anticipated adverse impacts do not appear to be minimized or mitigated to the maximum extent practicable. Alternatives to the proposed action that will reduce potential impacts should be examined. For Further Information Contact: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: (631) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Commissioner, NYS DEC New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Architectural Review Committee Army Corps of Engineers Suffolk County Department of Public Works File Page 5 of 6 JCY-GG-Ct'W'U .=•41 rVtLl_-,UIY HPIU YUYC b.3 i 4GD t�Jr I''. IdG 6,7.20 • Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full FAF Lc designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is riot always easy to answer, frequently, there are aspects of a pryect that are subjective or unmeasurable. It s also understood that those who dotermine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular a ea may nut be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance, The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been ordedy, comorenonsive in narure yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to ft a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF s comprised of three parts: Part 1; Provides odjective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer 'n the anaivsis that takes olace in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially -large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3, If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially -large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions at EAF completed for this project ® Part 1 12 Part 2 ©Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts t and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and ccnsldering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. 'The project will not result in any large and Important impact(s) and, therefore, Is one which will not have a significant impact on the .InvirQnment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the envirorment, there will nut be a significant effect for this uniisLed Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared." C. The project may, resu t it ore or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the ervi'omnent, therefore a pasitiva declaration will be prepared. *A Corxiitiuned Negative Declaration is oniv valid for Unlisted Actions GAi A Name o' Lead Agency �FeKI n 3. Good h ruse Chalrpfy- u - Print or Type 1113me of Responsible Officer inLeadAgency Title of Responsl9le. onicer signi a of ResInsibib Officer in Lead Agency \X l l �t Pege 1 of 21 SEP 2 5 2006 0 0 PART 1 --PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Gaia Holistic Circle Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) els Shipyard Lane, East Marion, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York SCTM #1000-38-7-7.1 Name of Applicant/Sponsor Oki -Do Ltd. c/o Patricia Address 51020 Main Road City/PO Southold Business Telephone 1-631-765-4330 Name of Owner (if different) Oki -Do Ltd, Address City / PO 24E Business Telephone 1-212-799-9711 Description of Action: ,t' 7M. ^'11� 77 MAR 15 2006 ,.,eKwtnrt ra q. Statthe N3"' w'y' "` nnNa. iy, , jP Code—M'971 State NY Zip Code 10023 Proposed removal of an abandoned industrial building(s) and the construction of a It hotel complex with 114 guest rooms, restaurant, manager's residence, various accessory structures (swimming pool, meeting rooms, gazebosbulk, maintenance building etc.), I boat basin/slips, creation of lake/water feature, landscaping, reconstruction m existing gazebos a ince dredging, removal of deteriorated shoreline protection structures, construction of new shoreline protection structures, construction of sewage treatment facility de a i 8.7115 acre site. Page 2 of 21 0 0 Please Complete Each Question --Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: Urban P/ Industrial ElCommercial Residential (suburban) � Rural (non-farm) Forest Agriculture Other Abandoned industrial buildings 2. Total acreage of project area: 18.7115 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 14.4 acres 9.1 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) 0.1 acres 0.1 acres Water Surface Area 1.4 acres 2.1 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 1.5 acres I.0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 1.3 acres 6.3 acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: IDWell drained 100 % of site Moderately well drained _% of site. Poorly drained _% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? 0 Yes 1-01 No a. What is depth to bedrock NA (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: l l F 15% or greater__% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes I• No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑ Yes E�]No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-18 (in feer) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Elyes ❑ No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? 1-1 Yes • ❑ No Page 3 of 21 0 1 1 Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? EYes ❑ No Accordina to: Cramer Consulting Group eacn Osprey nest in southeast corner of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. dunes, other cteolooical QYes F] No Describe: The site is located adjacent to Gardeners Bay. While portions of the site contains "dune species" in the SE portion of site, the entire been disturbed in the past. However, this SE portion of the site will remain "natural'. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ElYes no If 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? FYes k u ltvn 15. 16. The site presently contains deteriorated, abandoned industrial buildings, that visually impact the visual quality. creams within or contiguous to project area: NA_ _. _._ _.. _... .__ _... _. _.. _... __........ nim,.,,. ,.v c ......... ................� .,:..__ ._ � . ... .. NA_.. - __.. _... .... __.. ............. �ancn, Punu�, weuanu areas wimin or contiguous to project area: Site i¢ adiacent to Gardmers Ray The sir= ,,, amd an u ,,,a,ned dredged basin uuacd in conlucnon with the previous oyster processing use. The north, south and west sides of the basin are bulkheaded, the eastern portion of the shoreline contains tidal wetlands. An inlet connects the basin to Gardiners Bay. U. Size (In acres): The basin is 1.3862 acres in size. Page 4 of 21 • 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? lil Yes No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Yes No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes FNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes ENO 19. Is the site located in or substantiallycontiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? uYes �No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes 6. Project Description 1 Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 18.7115 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 17.2 acres initially; 17.2 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.5 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. NA /o f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing Aband. ; proposed 189 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 107 peak (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: E. No One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 0 0 Ultimately I 114rooms 0 I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 35' height; 190' width; 200' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 928 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 5,363 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed Eyes DN0 ❑N/A a L`. y for whatintended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaping _... _. ._ _... _.. _. _. .. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E Yes 11 No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes 11 No 4. i1oW many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site 16.1 acres. Page 5 of 21 0 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally -important vegetation be removed by this project? MYes 7 No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: NA months, (including demolition) 7. If multi -phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 2 or 3 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 3 month 2007 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 35' month 2005 year. d. Is phase l functionally dependent on subsequent phases? lil Yes E]No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑ Yes FX1 No 9, Number ofjobs generated: during construction 200' ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 100 11 . Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? r_1 Yes F—m] No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? 1:1 Yes M No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? lil Yes O No Type Sanitary stonnwater runoff 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? 0Yes [�]No If yes, explain: Project includes the creation of approx. 0.7 acre naturalized lake/water feature on site as part of the landscaping. 1 S. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? F -- ]Yes No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? I iYesLJ No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 0.7 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? E' Yes 0 No C . If yes, give name Southold Transfer Sta. ; location Cutchogue Southold J, Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? EYes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 0 e. If yes, explain: 0 It is intended to recycle portions of the abandoned building (steel, concrete, ect.) during demolition. 17 Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ElYes nNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposals tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? Years. 18 Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes F No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? nYes ENo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? E]Yes 1�1No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? F Yes 0 No If yes, indicate type(s) fossil fuels, electricity to operate facility. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NA gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? F]Yes F No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ■ Site plan ❑' Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑ ether Page 8 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board Yes M No City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes ❑ No Site Plan City, Town Zoning Board Yes No Special Permits for Trans. Motel & Restaurant City, County Health Department Eyes ❑ No SCDHS Site Plan Other Local Agencies Yes F1 No Trustee's Wetlands Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes M No State Agencies Yes ❑ No NYSDEC Tidal Wetlands Federal Agencies MEYes No US Anny Corp C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes ❑ No If Yes, indicate decision required: Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ■ Site plan ❑' Special use permit ❑Resource management plan ❑ ether Page 8 of 21 0 6 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? 3 vtarine II (MIT) District Vhat is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 18.7115 acre boatyard/marina for building, storing, repairing, renting, selling or servicing boats, which may include the following as an accessory use: office for the sale of marine equipment or products, dockside facilities for dispensing of fuel, and similar uses. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. mat is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? M Yes M No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Yn mile radius of proposed action? Multi -family and single-family residential, agricultural, abandoned industrial land uses. Zoning is R-40 (1 -acre single-family), RR (Resort Residential - Multi -family), M11 (Marine District - site). 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y< mile? g. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA a. What is the miniminm lot size proposed? NA Fage 9 of 21 Fi Yes F]No 0 E 10. Will proposed action require any authorization (s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? n Ypc i. Ni„ 11 VV IPJ Ll I �i iupuseo action I �tcreate a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? IDo Yes 1 1 No a, If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? El Yes No 12. will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ill a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. [ Iypq Slight increase in local traffic as per Dunn Engineering Associates review (4/2005). aformational Details E] Yes E No F-1 Ki.. Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Patrica Moore, Esq. for Oki -Do Date Signature Title Attorney for Owner If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 0 0 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) I In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. I The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific projector site other examples and/or lower thresholds maybe appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. I The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. I The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. I In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. Page 11 of 21 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO © YES ❑i Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot © ❑ © Yes []No rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table © Yes [:]No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ❑ ❑ © Yes [:]No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes f7 No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or El © 0 Yes ❑No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove © © ❑ Yes ❑No more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Page 11 of 21 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) ElNO ©YES • Specific land forms: Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) []NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. • Ctthpr imnnrfc- © ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ❑ © ©Yes [:]No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ QYes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) ElNO ©YES • Specific land forms: Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) []NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. • Ctthpr imnnrfc- © ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑e ❑Yes ❑No © ❑ ©Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1:1 No 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non -protected existing or new body of water? [:]NO ❑i YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ❑ ® ❑ Yes ❑ No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No area. Other impacts: ® ❑e Yes ❑ No :onstruction of pond system requiring proper design considerations and possible NYSDEC permit Page 12 of 21 0 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? 1:1 NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. 0 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change ❑ 0 ❑Yes [—!]No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 11 No © ❑ ❑ Yes © No © ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ [j] ❑ Yes ❑ No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ❑ ❑ [:]Yes ❑ No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No chemical products greater than 1, 100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑Yes ❑ No Page 13 of 21 0 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ©NO El YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑� ❑' Yes F_] No ❑ © [:]Yes F] No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ El [H]Yes ❑No Large scale grading and development proximate to wetlands and surface water IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes [:]No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5lbs. per hour ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [3 No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ❑NO ❑. YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 Development and disturbance of vegetation in proximity to surface water and wetlands g. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non -threatened or non - endangered species? []NO E] YES 1 2 3 Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident Small to Potential Can Impact Be or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Moderate Large Mitigated by • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of Impact Impact Project Change Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, 0 ❑ ❑' Yes [:]No other than for agricultural purposes. ❑� ❑ ❑� Yes []No Other impacts: El ❑ ❑' Yes ❑No Development and disturbance of vegetation in proximity to surface water and wetlands g. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non -threatened or non - endangered species? []NO E] YES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑ NO ❑ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident © ❑ ❑ Yes ©No or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑ Yes ❑ No agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ❑ ❑ ❑i Yes [—]No mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ • Other impacts: ❑� ❑ ❑� Yes []No Potential ecological impacts should be assessed IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑ NO ❑ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ® ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by © Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ® ❑ ❑ Yes © No agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain patterns, whether man-made or natural. lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to El Yes ❑ No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce increased runoff). ❑ ❑ Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑ No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) [:]NO ©i YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different © ©' '❑ Yes ❑ No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use Yes No patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ 0 El Yes ❑ No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes []No their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ❑ ❑ OYes [:]No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes © No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ©NO ©. YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ occurring wholly or partially within or Yes No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes []No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive 0 ❑ Q Yes ❑ No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 0 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No Potential impact to archaeological resources must be assessed and mitigated IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. © ❑ [:]Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [--]No Change in land use and open space character in area of public road and water access location IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? [H] NO ©YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: Page 17 of 21 ❑ ❑ ©Yes [:]No ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes F-1 No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 0 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ❑ NO ❑. YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. • Othpr imnar.}s- IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ❑. NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ❑NO ❑. YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. • Other impacts: Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change ❑' ❑ QYes [:1 No ❑ '❑ QYes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ []Yes [:]No 0 ❑ E] Yes E] No ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? no NO ®YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? 11 NO ElYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) Page 19 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]NO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 11 No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No El ❑ E]Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 17 No El ❑ ❑Yes ❑No i Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? []NO ®i YES 0 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change ® ® ❑Yes r7No 0 17 Yes riNo © © ElYes ©No If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Robert Kassner Legal Assistant Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Att: Amy/Bruno Re: GAIA Holistic Circle SCTM41000-38-7-7.1 Dear Amy: Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretaries Enclosed are 10 copies of the Draft Scope for DEIS. When the document in your file was forwarded to me by e-mail the spacing was affected. The enclosed is a hard copy of the same document received from Cramer Consulting. Please use the enclosed for your file and referrals. Very tr ours, tricia C. Moore `' 1 2 2006 0 G PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Ms. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: September 8, 2006 Re: Site plan of GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do Ltd. SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 In accordance with Amy's request enclosed is a Draft Scope for Environmental Impact Statement. This document has previously been submitted by Cramer Consulting to N P & V for their review and comment. To date they have not received a response. We will assume that the document The $5,000 SEQRA fee was previously submitted, however, after the Board directed us to obtain the check the Town Attorney requested that the check be reissued to NP&V to hold in their escrow account. My client is out of the Country, we will try to have the check replaced as soon as possible. My client is very anxious to coordinated the date with our consultants for the Scoping Hearing, if you have alternative dates available please have your staff contact my office. Your courtesies are appreciated. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. cc: Butt Otruba-O'Connor, Architects Cramer Consulting Group D r jj SF? i a Sout; s„ 1v*1 � — Plannir:� bver� 0 IMPACT STATEMENT DRAFT SCOPE FOR DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL "GAIA HOLISTIC CIRCLE" PROPOSED SPECIAL EXCEPTION PERMIT FOR TRANSIENT MOTEL SHIPYARD LANE, EAST MARION, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Overview This document is a Draft Scope for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS") for a proposed transient motel on a 17.325 -acre parcel located at the southerly end of Shipyard Lane on Gardener's Bay, in the hamlet of East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The proposed action includes the construction of a 114 -room motel in 24 buildings, with a related restaurant, a pool, personal services facilities, a private marina with 16 boat slips, maintenance and utility building, and a manager's residence. The proposed motel property would be aesthetically improved with a man-made lake, Japanese gardens and native landscaping. To ensure that the DEIS will address all significant issues, the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, as lead agency, has elected to conduct formal scoping pursuant to 6 NYCRR §617.8. As such, the applicant is required to prepare and submit this Draft Scope to the lead agency which provides a description of the proposed action and the --- --- .a� ,".....,-,....._. applicants' proposed content for the DEIS. Thus, this Drag" Scope has been prepared in accordance with 6 NYCRR §617.8 and sets forth the followmjr, • Brief description of the proposed action; � b� SEP 1 7 2006 • Potentially significant adverse impacts; __ • Extent and quality of information needed to ade ately address potentially .._ significant adverse impacts; • Initial identification of mitigation measures; and • Reasonable alternatives to be considered. 0 0 Description of the Proposed Action The proposed action includes the construction of a 114 -unit motel. The location of units will vary by building type, including a transient motel building with 27 units, nine buildings containing five units each, and 13 buildings containing three units each. The total building area dedicated to motel units is 85,874± square feet. The proposed development also includes a 3,834± -square -foot restaurant, a 1,987± -square -foot manager's residence, and a 1,373± -square -foot pool house with a swimming pool. On- site parking consisting of 189 spaces, including 27 landbanked spaces, will be constructed to accommodate guests and employees. A private marina with 16 boat slips is also proposed. In order to facilitate development the action will require the demolition and disposal of approximately 35,165 square feet of existing structures (the old oyster processing plant); material will be recycled as appropriate. Debris and old bulkhead (approximately 456 linear feet) will be removed along Gardener's Bay. A stone revetment, matching the shore protection structure of the condominiums to the west, will be in stalled where the old bulkhead was located. The refurbishment of the existing boat basin, to create the private marina, will include replacement in-place of approximately 515 linear feet of existing bulkhead. The existing fixed pier will be removed and replaced with approximately 540 feet of floating docks (including eight (8) 4 -foot by 30 -foot floating finger piers) within boat basin. In addition, approximately 2,500 cubic yards of material will be dredged from the inlet of boat basin. Dredge spoil to be used as beach nourishment, fill behind stone revetment and/or disposed of at an approved upland location. The aesthetics of the property will be diverse with natural features, including a man-made lake that traverses the unit areas, Japanese gardens and native plantings as landscaping. Primary access to the subject property would be from Shipyard Lane, at its southern extent. The project shall seek LEED green building status. This includes, but not limited to energy usage and efficiency, restoration of land and shoreline, recycling, water savings, transportation, etc. 0 0 The subject property is situated within a Marina II Zoning District and the use is permitted by special exception from the Town of Southold Board of Appeals. The proposed drainage plan would include drywells and a man-made lake, designed to accommodate 100 percent of stormwater on the site. Sanitary discharge would be accommodated on-site with a CromaglassTM treatment system, which would be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("SCDHS"). Potable water for domestic use and fire protection is available along Shipyard Lane from water mains owned by the Suffolk County Water Authority ("SCWA"). The proposed plan would include the establishment of a new connection to the SCWA mains. Site History The subject property was improved with an oyster -processing facility circa 1964, together with three smaller detached wooden and metal buildings. One or more of these detached buildings was used for maintenance and/or repair activities, since equipped with waste oil and other oil USTs, and as a machine shop. In addition, an existing metal storage and maintenance building, likely used for boat maintenance, was completed in 1983 and East End Diesel, Inc., a diesel engine repair and remanufacturing company, occupied the southernmost building from the late 1980s to circa 1996. The oyster - processing facility ceased operations circa 1988 and the subject property is currently vacant. Single-family homes and crop fields historically surrounded the subject property. In order to develop the site as proposed, the following approvals are required: Agency Approval Town of Southold Board of Appeals Special Exception Use Town of Southold Planning Board Site Plan Town of Southold Highway Department Road Work Permit Town of Southold Town Trustees Wetlands Permit Suffolk County Department of Health Services Sewage Treatment Plant Suffolk County Water Authority Water Supply Connection New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 1. Notice of Intent — SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges During Construction Activities 2. SPDES Discharge Permit 0 E The section of the DEIS entitled Description of the Proposed Action will provide a thorough description of the existing site conditions and the proposed action (which has been briefly described above). The Description of the Proposed Action section of the DEIS will specifically include information relating to: • Site and project history (including prior public involvement and input) and objectives of the project sponsor; • Project purpose, need and benefits; • Physical characteristics of the site and existing site conditions; 1 Utilities; • A summary of subsurface features, suspected contamination on the area proposed for development and remediation initiatives; • Detailed information on the proposed development including zoning and build -out data (e.g., buildings, pavement, landscaping, buffers, etc.) and site operations; • Site access and circulation; • Infrastructure demands including water supply, wastewater treatment and storm water management; and • Required approvals. Potentially Significant Adverse Impacts The DEIS will be prepared in accordance with 6 NYCRR §617.9(b). The Environmental Assessment Form identified the following potential adverse environmental impacts that may result from implementation of the proposed action that, as such, must be evaluated in the DEIS: soils and topography; water resources; ecology; land use and zoning; transportation; community facilities and services; aesthetics and cultural resources; and Consistency Analysis with the New York State Coastal Zone Management Program. These potential adverse impacts will be fully addressed in various DEIS sections, as briefly outlined below. 11 Soils and Topoeraphv The Soil Survey of Suffolk County will be reviewed to determine soil classifications on the site and in the project area. This section of the DEIS will assess the soil type(s) on the site and the associated engineering limitations using the Soil Survey of Suffolk County and available soil boring logs. Topographic information will be included as obtained through review of relevant USGS Maps and available site-specific topographic surveys. A thorough narrative description of potential adverse impacts to soils and topography and strategies to minimize impacts will be included in this analysis. Changes in topography that would occur, including a quantitative characterization of the cut and fill required, will also be provided. Water Resources To adequately assess the potential impacts associated with the proposed development, the recommendations of the Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study) will be reviewed for applicability and consistency of the proposed action therewith. The DEIS will also discuss the relevancy of the Special Groundwater Protection Area (SGPA) Plan. Furthermore, the consistency of the proposed action with the findings of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and Nonpoint Source Management Handbook will be evaluated. Applicable Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) regulations and requirements will be identified, and the compliance of the action with same will be evaluated. Regional and local hydrogeology conditions and regional water quality will be discussed. Depth to groundwater and direction of flow will be determined. The DEIS will provide calculations of projected water consumption for each use 0 0 proposed and, in consultation with the Suffolk County Water Authority, will evaluate the ability to meet this projected water demand. The existing stormwater management system on the site will be described. This will include, but not be limited to: stormwater generated, available information relative to collection and management systems, and system capacity. In addition, post -development stormwater management conditions will be evaluated. This evaluation will include: calculations of stormwater to be generated, details of the proposed collection and management systems, system capacity, future maintenance practices for stormwater collection and leaching structures and analysis of how the proposed stormwater management system will comply with applicable regulatory requirements, including the Phase 2 stormwater regulations. Means of sanitary disposal will also be discussed in this section of the DEIS. Calculations of projected sanitary flow and consistency with the Suffolk County Sanitary Code will also be provided. The proposed project's impact on groundwater quality will be evaluated. As the proposed action includes the installation of an irrigation well, the yield of the well must be provided to determine the need for a Long Island Well Permit and to evaluate the potential impacts associated therewith. As the site is situated in Zone AE, base elevations as promulgated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) would be identified, and a consistency analysis with same would be included. Federal and State wetland maps indicate that the proposed action would be under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("ACOE") and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("NYSDEC"). As such, all required wetland permit applications to the ACOE and the NYSDEC would be made. Copies of all existing wetland permits would also be provided (e.g., the existing maintenance dredge permit) and a discussion of each permit will be included. 0 0 Ecology All natural resources existing on the site will be evaluated in the DEIS through an inspection of the site by a qualified biologist/ecologist to determine the vegetation, wildlife, and general habitat character. An inventory of flora and fauna observed and expected will be provided in this section of the DEIS. In addition, protected native plants, plant and animal species listed as endangered, threatened, special concern (or with other protective status) and significant habitat areas on or in the vicinity of the project site will be identified. As part of this assessment, the NYSDEC Natural Heritage Program will be contacted to obtain available information on significant natural resources on the site or in the surrounding area. Once the existing conditions data are obtained, future changes expected to any natural resources on the site and/or in the surrounding area will be assessed. Specifically, this section of the DEIS will evaluate the impacts of the proposed plan on the terrestrial ecology of the area. E Land Use and Zoning 0 This section of the DEIS will describe existing land use and zoning on the subject site and in the surrounding area. A physical description of the property (size, boundaries, etc.) will be provided. This section of the DEIS will also provide information on the development history of the site and surrounding area; a land use study of surrounding areas; description of zoning regulations for the project site and surrounding area zoning. As part of this effort, relevant land use plans and policies, including the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, will be reviewed. Specifically, this effort will evaluate applicable comprehensive plans and master planning efforts. This section of the DEIS will also describe the proposed action in detail including each of the proposed uses and their proposed location on the subject property. The DEIS will present a site plan that will clearly identify all areas to be developed with buildings, parking areas, walkways, etc. as well as all impervious areas and their use. Once the above information is compiled, the DEIS will assess the impacts of the proposed action on land use and zoning. The impact assessment will concentrate on evaluating the consistency of the proposed action with prevailing land use and zoning. The compatibility of the proposed action with area land use will be assessed. Transportation The DEIS will include a thorough analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed development on the area's roadway system. The work performed will include analyses of the proposed plan and internal roadway system and a full traffic impact study assessing the proposed development's impact on the surrounding roadways. Tasks to be performed as part of the traffic impact study will include collection of data regarding planned roadway improvements and other developments, field surveys and counts of existing traffic volumes, estimates of future traffic volumes, analyses of existing and future traffic volumes and identification and timing of required roadway improvements and the entity responsible for initiating those improvements. The following specific tasks 0 E will be undertaken and documented in the traffic and transportation section of the DEIS: 1. Several personal, on-site field observations to observe the traffic movements under various conditions. 2. A physical inventory of the adjacent street network. An analysis of the traffic volume data obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. 4. Supplementary manual traffic counts and Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR) counts to be collected as necessary to update the available volume counts. 5. An examination of the traffic flow on Main Road (NYS Route 25) and Shipyard Lane in the vicinity of the site. 6. An evaluation of the safety factors by reviewing recent accident records obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation. 7. The availability of police and fire protection services to the site. 8. A trip generation analysis to determine the additional traffic attributable to the proposed Gaia Holistic Center development. 9. A directional distribution analysis to distribute the site -generated traffic onto the surrounding street network. 10. A trip assignment analysis to examine the composite traffic volumes that would result due to the addition of the site -generated traffic to the existing traffic volumes in order to determine the traffic impacts on the surrounding roadways. 11. Capacity analyses at key signalized and unsignalized intersections in order to examine their ability to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed Gaia Holistic Center. 12. A review of the access arrangements. 13. An evaluation of the adequacy of the proposed parking to meet the demands of the proposed use. 14. Conclusions of the traffic impact of the development as a result of the data 0 0 and facts gathered in this study. Community Facilities and Services The existing community services and the ability of these services to accommodate the proposed project will be described. The services include: • Police; • Fire and Ambulance Services; Water supply; • Sanitary; and • Solid Waste. The impact analysis contained in the DEIS will include consultations with service providers regarding existing demand for services and capacity such that the DEIS will objectively analyze the impact of the proposed action on community facilities and services. The DEIS will include detailed projections of service demand with supporting documentation. Aesthetics and Cultural Resources This section of the DEIS will discuss and depict (through representative photographs) the current aesthetic character of the site and surrounding area. Architectural renderings of the proposed development and/or line -of -sight drawings from Gardiners Bay will be prepared to determine the visual impact of the proposed project. With regard to cultural resources, consultations will be undertaken with the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation ("OPRHP"). If additional testing is requested by OPRHP, a qualified archaeologist will be retained to perform same. If any cultural such resources exist, the impacts of the proposed development on same will be assessed by a qualified archaeologist and the results of that study will be provided in the DEIS. 0 0 Extent and Quality of Information Needed to Adequately Address Potentially Significant Adverse Impacts In order to conduct the analyses of potential adverse impacts, available information will be collected and reviewed and empirical information will be developed. While it is not possible to determine all information sources to be used, the following represents sources/research that have been preliminarily identified as necessary to perform the required analyses in the DEIS. Soils Subsurface Conditions and Topography • Soil Survey of Suffolk County • Available soil boring logs • Existing studies, analyses, reports, regulatory documentation regarding subsurface conditions • USGS Maps and available site specific topographic surveys Water Resources • United States Geological Survey. 2002. Water Table of the Upper Glacial Aquifer on Eastern Long Island. • Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan • Special Groundwater Protection Area Plan • Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) • Nonpoint Source Management Handbook • Flood Insurance Rate Maps • NYSDEC Freshwater and Tidal Wetland Maps • National Wetlands Inventory Map • Consultations with the Suffolk County Water Authority • Suffolk County Sanitary Code and other applicable regulations • Consultations with NYSDEC and ACOE E Ecology 0 • Site inspections by a qualified biologist/ecologist • Consultations with the NYSDEC Natural Heritage Program Land Use and Zoning • Available and relevant comprehensive plans (zoning maps, codes, Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, etc.) of the Town of Southold and Suffolk County • Site and area inspections Transportation • Traffic counts • Accident data review • Projections of site generated traffic using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication entitled Trip Generation, Seventh Edition or any subsequent edition • Highway Capacity Manual Community Facilities and Services • Consultations with community services providers (police, fire, ambulance, water purveyor, sanitary, solid waste) Aesthetics and Cultural Resources • Site and area inspections and photographs • Consultations with the OPRHP Initial Identification of Mitisation Measures As the DEIS analyses have not yet been conducted, no specific mitigation measures have yet been developed. Nonetheless, where the impact analyses conducted in the DEIS indicate the potential for significant adverse impacts, this section of the DEIS will set forth measures to mitigate those impacts. Actions required and parties responsible to implement the mitigation will be identified. Reasonable Alternatives to Be Considered Pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, the DEIS must contain a description and evaluation of reasonable alternatives to the proposed action. Thus, the DEIS will analyze the impacts of the following alternatives and quantitatively and qualitatively compare these impacts to those associated with implementation of the proposed action: No -Action (i.e., site physically remains as it currently exists and is fully occupied); and Development in accordance with prevailing zoning (i.e., Country - Residence 40). Or¢anization of DEIS Although not required as part of a Draft Scope pursuant to 6 NYCRR §617.8, so that involved agencies and interested parties can comment on the proposed sections of the DEIS, below is a proposed table of contents: 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Description of the Proposed Action 3.0 Existing Environmental Conditions 3.1 Soils and Topography 3.2 Water Resources 3.3 Ecology 3.4 Land Use and Zoning 3.5 Transportation 3.6 Community Facilities and Services 3.7 Aesthetics and Cultural Resources 4.0 Probable Impacts of the Proposed Action 4.1 Soils and'ropography 4.2 Water Resources 4.3 Ecology 4.4 Land Use and Zoning 4.5 Transportation 4.6 Community Facilities and Services 4.7 Aesthetics and Cultural Resources 5.0 Mitigation Measures 6.0 Alternatives and their Impacts 6.1 No -Action 6.2 Development in accordance with prevailing zoning 7.0 Unavoidable Adverse Effects 8.0 Irretrievable and Irreversible Commitment of Resources 9.0 Growth Inducing Aspects 10.0 Use and Conservation of Energy i PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 RE: OKI -DO LTD. Dear Sir or Madam: Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 6 August 29, 2006 Cith rence to the above, enclosed please find my clients check in the amount of $5as requested at your work session which represents a partial payment of th,kE tal Review Fee.Whould have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thank you, PCM/bp encls. C: Dr. Kazuko Hiilyer e truly yours a 6 Patricia C. Mo re D F l A' Nlg,'24/2@06 O:e@ K:1 -853-4U44 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Ms Amy Ford Senior Planner Town of Southold P, O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 1 1971 Via Fax Deas Ms. Ford; S C PLANING DEPT COL NTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SU'FOLKCOUNTY EXECUTIVE ,..�,�.,,,...•. _..,_, August-2�: 200ti-"'.�"� Gain Holistic I'# 1A00 -38 -7 - PAGE 02 THOMAS A. ISLES, A.I.C. P. DIREr"M OF PLANNING Oki -Do, Ltd. Your notification for SEQRA CI )ordination was received by our agency on July 28, 2006. Please be advised that our agency, the Suffolk Con ity Planning Commission, is an interested agency and hence has no objection to the Town of Southold assutn ng Lead Agency status for the above referenced action. The Suffolk County Planning Commission reserves &e right to eommemon this proposed action in the future and wants to be kept infettned of all actions taken pursuant to SEQRA. The following comments regardi ig his action were provided in this agency`s letter ofMay 3, 2006 to the Planning Board: • The most landward limit of wetlEnd was last field flagged August 12, 2003. As wetland lines tend to migrate over time, the most landward limit of wetland should be re -flagged in the Eeld by a qualified expert and represented or. all find plans, etc. All wetland setbacks should be readjusted accordingly. • The applicant should review the Suffolk County Planning Department 1990 report `Study of Man - Made Ponds in SutTolk Caunry,'VY" prior to final design with the Town. • Landscaping on the subject prop my should be non-fettiliur dependent native plant species. • All drainage should be kept on site and not flow into wetlands or public right-of-way. Tltar.k you for the opportunity to comment on this action. Sincerely, e �. Peter K. Lamber; Principal Planne� cc: Andrew Preieng, Chief Planner M'\SSQ,RAbCCF.$nalkloidiGai� !�ol'lehc Cirelc CXci Do -d .c LOCAON H. L EDDENNISON BLDG. -4TH FLOOR 100 /FTERANQ VrMOR'AL "HIGHWAY MAUNG ADDRESS P. O. BOX 8100 HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-00SS e31) ama l oo fax e31)853.4044 S -r �21 •. wy/24/20.36 10:,;0 631--G53-4b,,4 S C PLANING DEPT PAGE 91 Suffolk County Department of Planning FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET Tv: Awl: tc o j From: �fE v �dt�y✓fi Date; 2tf ,41 Z00 0 Subject: SEOk'A- rf-yov:u �E < IOU SHOULD RECEIVE �' PAGE(S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET - IF YOUDO IVOT.R.ECEI6E ALL 1HE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (631) 853-3190. Message: LOCAMON MAILING AOORE55 H, LCC DmiwsaN BLOV. - 4'-M FLOOR P.O. Box 6 t 00 (631) 553.5 190 i 00 VEWRANS MEMORIAL H", HAVPPAUCK, NY I 1708-0099 FAx! (931) 853-4044 lis New York State Department of Environmental Conservation_tki` Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stonyy Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631) 444-0365 FAX:(631)444-0360 oboe August 21, 2006 Denis- Involved Agencies Commissioner - NYSDEC - Town of Southold Suffolk County Department of Health Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST AUG 2 8 2006 Dear Sirs/Madams - The purpose of this request is to determine under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency; 3. Issues of concern your agency believes should be evaluated. Enclosed is a copy of our permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in responding. Project Name: OKI -DO LTD. Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion Hotel Project Location: 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 DEC Application #: 1-4738-00728/00008 Permit Tyne: Tidal Wetlands SEORA Classification: [x ] Type I [ ] Unlisted DEC Position: [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status. [x] DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. Please respond to my attention within 30 days of the date of this letter. If no response is received within 30 days, we will assume that you have no objection to DEC or another agency assuming the role of lead agency, and have no comments to offer regarding the proposed action at this time. Please feel free to contact this office at (631) 444-0365 for further information or discussion. Sincerely, cc: (see distribution list above) Kendall Klett AUG 2 S 20061 Analyst vvn. nr r �fvn fif✓6� New York State Ar FOR PERMIT , ' " IS'States Army Corps of Engineers , Applcable to agenda$ and permit categories Istel In Item 1. Pleaaa read M Inskedlons on back Anedn Wdiaonal Iraarmetlon as needed. Pteeae prim lagldy a hoe. 1. Check pemage applied for. NYS Dept of Environmental Conservation 2. Name of Apptleant full as OKI -DO LTD. , 7QZUk() [ I Telephone Number (daytime) 212 799-9711 ❑ Sfmem Disturbance (Bed and Banks) Wiling Address ❑ Navigable Waters (Excavation and Fill). ONE LINCOLN PLAZA,9PI?dE Post OQica' NEW YORK - ...� R State NY Zip- Cede 10023 ❑ Docks, Moorings w Platforms (Construct or piece) ❑ Dams and Impoundment Structures (Constn4 Reconstruct or Repair) ❑ Freshwater Wetlands J. TaVayer ID (N applicant b not indivkWali ., ❑✓ Tidal Wetlands ❑ Coastal Erosion Control ❑ Wid, Scenic: and Recreational Rivers ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification ❑ POW* Water Supply ❑ Long bland V%ffs 4. Applicant Is atm: (check as E) Owner ❑ Operator asiappy) .....:' Lessee ... ❑ MunitpaFy / Oovetln encs a. N applicant b not the owner, cent .Owner or Agent/Contact Person CRAMER CONSULTING Fere - otherwise, you end/Contact Person kdonnstbn. 'Omnia a Agent /Contact Telephone Nurhber (daytime) GROUP "' 1631476-0984 Melling Address ❑ Aquatic Vegetation Contra Aquatic Insect Control Frere control PO BOX 5535 pad O/tce MILLER PLACE 117Zlo 64 6. Project/Fselity Location (me rk'sae )n4pp¢ponli ) Countv: T =map, :.." .. Mao Section/ Block /Lot Number. SUFFOLK EAST MARION 000-38-7-7,1 NYS DISCO of General Services (Stab owned Lands Underwater) ❑ Ieaee, License, Easement" other ReatProperty lntere,t Utility Easement (pipelines, Conduits, Location (indhdna Street or Road) -- - EIS SHIPYARD LANE TWeohoae Number (devime) cables, etc.) ❑ Docks, Moorings or Platlom s (Construct or Place) Post Of ice EAST MARION Stab NY ZIP Code 11939 7. Name of Streamer Wale GARDINERS BAY ,body (on or mea p ojed,ite> Adlydndxk Perk ligancy 6. Nerve of USGS Quad Map: Location Coordmdex ❑ Freshwater Wetland, Permit ❑ Wid, Scenic and Recreational Rivers Lake George Park Commission GREENPORT QUAD NYlt1a-E NYTM-N 4 6, Protect Des ripWn and Pmpuse: (Category of Activity e.g. crew co istructim4l3ialb0on, makde,,,de or replacement Type or Structure OrActivity e.g. bulkhead, dredging, Poling. dam. dodo taking of water. Type of Materials and Quantities; Strudure and Work Area Dimensions; Need or Purpose Served) PROPOSED REMOVAL OF ❑ Docks (Construct orPbce) ❑ Moorings (Establish) US" Corps of Engineers ❑ Section 404 (Walere of the United States) ABANDONED INDUSTRIAL BLDGS.; CONSTRUCTION OF HOTEL FOR 114 GUESTS, RESTAURANT, VARIOUS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES; REFURBISH BOAT BASINISLIPS; CREATION OF LAKE; LANDSCAPING; RECONSTRUCT EXISTING BULKHEADING; DREDGING; REMOVAL OF DETERIORATED SHORELINE PROTECTION STRUCTURES; CONSTRUCTION OF NEW SHORELINE PROTECTION STRUCTURES, ❑a Section to (Riven, and Harbors Act) CONSTRUCTION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT FACILITY ❑ NaWnwoe Permit (a) Identify Number(s) .. For Agency Un Ony: DEC APPLICATION NUMBER US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FRI o Deb: Mid r° reel Sate land7❑ Yes No UNKNOWN 14, Fos Wmk Begun cal project? of yea, attach ❑ [a 11& ListPrevbua Permit/Application Numbers and Daus: (NAny) 0%pbnatierl of why work was started without permit) Yea No 16, Will this Project Require Additional Yes Fadwal, sub, or Local PetmitsT Ye No PI Lilt TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SCDHS 17. NappNcant Is not the delver, both must sign the application I hereby alMm that infomlallon provided on this form and all attadmtenb Submitted herewith is sue to the beg of my knowledge and belief. False steuments made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pwannnb Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. Fuller, the applicant atxepte full responsibility for all damage, direct or indirect of whaiewr nature, and by whomever suffered waft out of the project deadaod herein and agrees 10 Indemnity and save harmless the State from sale, actions, damages and coed of ovary name and description reaulting from said project In addition, Federal Lsw, In U.S.C.. Berson 1001 provides for a fibu of nota ti gain ns, or use 0 or Impiboroherd for not more than 3 years, or both where an applicant knowingly and wS(npy is 18 00mlMle, Or coven up a material fad; or oowingly makes or ogee a tate. tctldous a fraudulent statement. Date�- Signature of Applicant Title Dale I K`iQ Signature of Owner Title 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is riot always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet Flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may Occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate Or whether it is a potentially -large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially -large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD A EN Y USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: El part 1 d Part 2 considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), an y her supporting information, and A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared. C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a positive declaration WIN be prepared "A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Gaia Holistic Circle @ East Marion Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Ofncer Signature of Responsible Officer In Lead Agency Signature of Preparer If di event omresponsib e o Icer Page 1 of 21 E Please Complete Each Question --Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: ❑ Urban E✓ Industrial 1:1 Commercial EIResidential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) Forest El Agriculture El Other Abandoned industrial buildin s 2. Total acreage of project area: 18.7115 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or Fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 14.4 acres 9.1 acres acres acres acres acres 0.1 acres 0.1 acres _I 4 acres 2.1 acres 1.5 acres 1.0 acres 1.3 acres 6.3 acres acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: Q Well drained 100 % of site ❑ Moderately well drained _% of site. ❑Poorly drained _% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? 1:1 Yes no No a. What is depth to bedrock NA (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: a0-10% 100% F-110-15% -% 1115%or greater_% 6. Is project substantiall contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LJ Yes n No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑ Yes EINo B. What is the depth of the water table? 0-18 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? no No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? n Yes No Page 3 of 21 11 . Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? aYes ❑ No Consulting Group Identify each species: Osprey nest in southeast corner of site. Area will remain natural any construction near it will be timed to avoid disturbance during nesting periods. 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other ❑Yes 0 No Describe: Phe site is located adjacent to Gardiners Bay. While portions of the site contains "dune species" in the SE portion of site, the entire teen disturbed in the past. However, this SE portion of the site will remain "natural". 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑ Yes ❑� No 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes The site presently contains deteriorated, abandoned industrial buildings, that visually impact the visual quality. 15. 16. Creams within or contiguous to project area: qA Name or btream and name Or River to Which it is tributary qA wKes, puns, weuamo areas wdrnn or contiguous to project area: _ Site is adjacent to Gardiners Bay. The site surround an unnamed dredged basin unsed in conjuction with the previous oyster processing use. The north, south and west sides of the basin are bulkheaded, the eastern portion of the shoreline contains tidal wetlands. An inlet connects the basin to Gardiners Bay. b. Size (in acres): rhe basin is 1.3862 acres in size. Page 4 of 21 Ar 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? a Yes No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? OnYesNo b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? El Yes RNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, Section 303 and 304? Yes s No 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes WNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). MYes a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 18.7115 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 17.2 acres initially; 17.2 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 1.5 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. NA % C Number of off-street parking spaces existing Aband. ; proposed 189 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 107 peak (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Initially 0 Ultimately I Two Family Multiple Family 114rooms ©u No Condominium 0 I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 35' height; 190' width; 200' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 928 R, 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 5,363 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed EYes E]No r]N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaping b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Yes ri No C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 2 Yes n No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 16.1 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally -important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑ Yes no No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: NA months, (including demolition) 7. If multi -phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 2 or 3 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 3 month 2007 year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 35' monthilato year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 0 Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑ Yes M No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 200' ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 100 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑ Yes O No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑ Yes 0 No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? a Yes ❑ No Type Sanitary stormwater runoff 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑ Yes ❑. No If yes, explain: Project includes the creation of approx. 0.7 acre naturalized lake/water feature on site as part of the landscaping. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? IF] Yes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑� Yes ❑ No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 0.7 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Q Yes ❑ No c. If yes, give name Southold Transfer Sta. ; location Cutchor ue, Southold d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑� Yes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: It is intended to recycle portions of the abandoned building (steel, concrete, ect.) during demolition. 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑ Yes ❑� No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposah tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes a No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑ Yes no No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes ENo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? F±] Yes 17 No If yes, indicate type(s) fossil fuels, electricity to operate facility. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NA gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, state or Federal funding? ❑ Yes ❑E No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 August 15, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki -Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M -II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 14, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1; and RESOLVED that, on July 10, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Type I Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency and will continue the review. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. 'PLANNING MAILING ADDRESS: BOARD MEMBES P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE -``��F soUjyo Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS yy T Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND C Olycoulm a Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 15, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki -Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M -II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 14, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1; and RESOLVED that, on July 10, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Type I Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency and will continue the review. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. V ' 0 0 Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki -Do Ltd. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator Page Two August 15, 2006 Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Architectural Review Committee Army Corps of Engineers Butt•Otruba-O'Connor Architects, AIA 1062 Northern Boulevard Roslyn, New York 11576 Tel. (516) 625.6625 Fax. (516) 625.6629 20 July 2006 Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Site Plan Review Application Comments from Meeting with Pat Moore 07.14.06 Gaia Holistic Center Shipyard Lane Town of Southold, New York Dear Mr. Semon Attached please find an outline with meeting review comments that my office received from Pat Moore. I have also attached the revised C-1 addressing the comments we have received to this point. The comments from the meeting are followed by responses from my office: 1. How do we plan to operate the bus, limo, etc? If this transportation is to be used, show parking spaces for buses, etc. There will be no on-site bus or hmo service utilized for the project. Vans will be used forguest transportation. `Van pool'parkingis provided on-site for 2 vehicles. 2. Remove design circles from site plan. Circles have been removed as requested. 3. Show dimensions on site plan. Dimensions have been indicated on the plan highlighting actual building setbacks, roadway widths and parking space sizes. 7/25/06 0 • 4. Parking slips do not match the schedule? Parking slips are 10'x20'. Please note: we have also provided parkingforgolf carts. These spaces are smaller than the standard 10'x20'general parking space. 5. Handicap spaces are not accurate, refer to ADA code change. Accessible space design has been revised to reflect latest ADA regulations. 6. Explain why is dumpster at proposed location? Dumpster location is best -suited area near north service entry. This spot also allows for either front or tearloading with easy access via the loop in the parking area. Trash will be carted to the dumpster from other areas of the site. Please note: the proper landscape buffer and screening will be provided. Wall and heavy shrubs. Cleves Point wanted us to try and keep all service up at the north end of the lot. We are open to suggestions. 7. Why is service entrance on opposite side of restaurant? At the request of the residential neighbors at the end of Shipyard Lane in Cleves Point, the service entry is placed closest to the main road (Rte. 25). Our intention is bring service vehicles on to our site limiting commercial tralric at the end of the road. 8. Describe private marina. Parking forguests' boats only. There will be no sleeping allowed on the boats. There will also be no service, repair or fueling in the marina. 9. Why 3 parking spaces for one single family? Why is parking so far away from single family? Two spaces have been provided near the residence. See revised site plan. 10. Is every guest getting a golf cart or will there be a fleet? Will there be drivers for the carts? Everyguest will not begetting a golf cart There will be 6golfcarts provided with drivers to shuttle guests, luggage and handicappedguests within the site. There is parkingprovided for the sixgolf carts near the northwestern comer of the site. If you have any further questions or comments please feel free to contact me in the office. Respectfully Submitted, -ATBA- Edward P. Butt Partner 7/25/06 i I SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Stephen M. Jones I Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, New York 11769-0901 Chief Executive Officer (631) 563-0219 Fax (631)563-0370 August 2, 2006 Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: SEQRA - Oki -Do Ltd, 238 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Our agency is in receipt of your correspondence dated July 27, 2006 and revised project description for the above captioned matter. In our initial review of this project and response to the town dated April 6, 2006, we had requested that our agency receive information on projected year round water demands, as additional demands on our water supply system may require upgrading of existing water mains supplying the site. To date we have not received this information. Since we have no flow information, the applicant can presume that upgrades to the system in a worst case scenario could potentially cost $75,600.00. Should you wish to discuss this matter further, please contact my office at 631-563-0219. *1urs, j AUG - 4 2006cer j I SMJ:kk CBy,wk_i. Pr" PLANNING BOARD MEMBEV JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND July28, 2006 Mr. Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Voorhis: In addition to the attached cover letter and revised project description, please find a copy of the resolution for SEQR lead agency coordination dated July 11, 2006 and Lead Agency Coordination Request dated July 24, 2006. Please be aware this office is in receipt of an initial check from the applicant for the SEQRA review fee, however, this office is waiting for a scope of work and associated cost estimate from your office. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions or need anything further. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Amy For Senior Planner Cc: File • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 oF so�Tyol Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex N 54375 Stata Route 25 • �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) �y �`� cOUNTI, Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Voorhis: In addition to the attached cover letter and revised project description, please find a copy of the resolution for SEQR lead agency coordination dated July 11, 2006 and Lead Agency Coordination Request dated July 24, 2006. Please be aware this office is in receipt of an initial check from the applicant for the SEQRA review fee, however, this office is waiting for a scope of work and associated cost estimate from your office. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions or need anything further. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Amy For Senior Planner Cc: File 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND July 27, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 Zoning District: MII District Dear Coordinating Agency Reviewer: Please add the attached Project Description, dated received July 27, 2006, to the resolution beginning the SEQRA review dated July 11, 2006. The clarification includes a revised project description about the proposal that will provide a better understanding of the project scope, including all upland and shoreline activities. The Planning Board tentatively plans on making an environmental determination at its August 14, 2006 meeting. Accordingly, we would appreciate receiving your responses by August 11, 2006 in order to give ourselves adequate time to review them Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions or need anything further. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Amy Fo Senior Planner Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk CountyDepartment of Health Services NYSDEC- StonyBrook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC File MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 q SO(/�yOl Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: 1�[ J Town Hall Annex va 54375 State Route 25 • �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 Zoning District: MII District Dear Coordinating Agency Reviewer: Please add the attached Project Description, dated received July 27, 2006, to the resolution beginning the SEQRA review dated July 11, 2006. The clarification includes a revised project description about the proposal that will provide a better understanding of the project scope, including all upland and shoreline activities. The Planning Board tentatively plans on making an environmental determination at its August 14, 2006 meeting. Accordingly, we would appreciate receiving your responses by August 11, 2006 in order to give ourselves adequate time to review them Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions or need anything further. Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Amy Fo Senior Planner Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk CountyDepartment of Health Services NYSDEC- StonyBrook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC File 0 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Memo: July 27, 2006 1 To: Amy/Bruno From: Pat Moore Re: GAIA In accordance with your request, enclosed is the concise "Project Description" prepared by Cramer Consulting. Also enclosed is my office check in the amoun of $850.00 )r the N. P & V SEQRA fee. �l^� If you need anything else please do not hesitate to contact me. GAIA HOLISTIC CIRCLE @ EAST MARION JUL 2 J 2006 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PREMISES: 2835 SHIPYARD LANE, EAST MARION NY SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 The proposed action includes the construction of a 114 -unit motel. The location of units will vary by building type, including a transient motel building with 27 units, nine buildings containing five units each, and 13 buildings containing three units each. The total building area dedicated to motel units is 85,874± square feet. The proposed development also includes a 3,834± -square -foot restaurant, a 1,987± -square -foot manager's residence, and a 1,373± -square -foot pool house with a swimming pool. On- site parking consisting of 189 spaces, including 27 landbanked spaces, will be constructed to accommodate guests and employees. A private marina with 16 boat slips is also proposed In order to facilitate development the action will require the demolition and disposal of approximately 35,165 square feet of existing structures (the old oyster processing plant); material will be recycled as appropriate. Debris and old bulkhead (approximately 456 linear feet) will be removed along Gardener's Bay. A stone revetment, matching the shore protection structure of the condominiums to the west, will be in stalled where the old bulkhead was located. The refurbishment of the existing boat basin, to create the private marina, will include replacement in-place of approximately 515 linear feet of existing bulkhead. The existing fixed pier will be removed and replaced with approximately 540 feet of floating docks (including eight (8) 4 -foot by 30 -foot floating finger piers) within boat basin. In addition, approximately 2,500 cubic yards of material will be dredged from the inlet of boat basin. Dredge spoil to be used as beach nourishment, fill behind stone revetment and/or disposed of at an approved upland location. The aesthetics of the property will be diverse with natural features, including a man-made lake that traverses the unit areas, Japanese gardens and native plantings as landscaping. Access to the subject property would be from Shipyard Lane, at its southern extent. The 7 project shall seek LEED green building status. This includes, but not limited to energy usage and efficiency, restoration of land and shoreline, recycling, water savings, transportation, etc. The proposed drainage plan would include drywells and a man-made lake, designed to accommodate 100 percent of stormwater on the site. Sanitary discharge would be accommodated on-site with a CromaglassTM treatment system, which would be subject to review and approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("SCDHS"). Potable water for domestic use and fire protection is available along Shipyard Lane from water mains owned by the Suffolk County Water Authority ("SCWA"). The proposed plan would include the establishment of a new connection to the SCWA mains. JUL 2 7 2006 �. PLANNING BOARD MEMBE)0 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND July26, 2006 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Mrs. Moore: Zoning District: MII District SCIM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 As per our meeting on July 14, 2006 with you and members of the Planning Department, this office has requested a revised Full Environmental Assessment Form to include a more detailed project description. As of today this office has not received this necessary information. In order to expedite a thorough review of this project, please submit a revised FEAF, including all upland and shoreline activities, to this Department as soon as possible. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions. Sincerely, Alny Ford Senior Planner Cc: File Planning Board Mark Terry, Interim Planning Director MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: OCJOUNVI�0 Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Mrs. Moore: Zoning District: MII District SCIM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 As per our meeting on July 14, 2006 with you and members of the Planning Department, this office has requested a revised Full Environmental Assessment Form to include a more detailed project description. As of today this office has not received this necessary information. In order to expedite a thorough review of this project, please submit a revised FEAF, including all upland and shoreline activities, to this Department as soon as possible. Please do not hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions. Sincerely, Alny Ford Senior Planner Cc: File Planning Board Mark Terry, Interim Planning Director PLANNING BOARD MEMBEV JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND July 24, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act- SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below, 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency, and 3. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 Zoning District: MII District Requested Action: This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MEI Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCI'M # 1000-38-7-7.1 . MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 QF so(/ryolo Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 G Q (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act- SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below, 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency, and 3. Issues of concern you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 Zoning District: MII District Requested Action: This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MEI Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCI'M # 1000-38-7-7.1 0 0 Lead Agency Coordination Request Page Two July 24, 2006 SEQRAClassification: (X) Type I () Type II () Unlisted Contact Person: Amy Ford, Senior Planner/Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer (631) 765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. O This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. () Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, qv�4&lAiLe,�� Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Southold Town Solid Waste District Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC- StonyBrook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department ul�14 06 11:42a .Moore Law Office �31 765 4643 p.1 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631)765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 J U L 1 4 2006 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET The pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from Patricia c.Moore. This infomiation is intended solely for use by the individual entity named as the recipient hereof. If you are not the intended recipient. be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange to retrieve this transmission at no cost to you. TO: LAUREN & SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES FAX NO: RE: OKI - DO: GAZA HOLISTIC CIRCLE (HILLYER) DATE: Friday July 14, 2006 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET IF TRANSMISSION IS FAULTY OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. CLIENT NAME: OPERA comments: As requested by your attorney, Brownell Johnston and Mr. King, enclosed is a draft letter for your review of the discussions made at the work session. If � 'atricia C. core u 1, 14 06 11:42a •Moore �� .. (�tiNof n) Robert Kassner Legal Assistant July 10, 2006 Southold Town Trustees P.O.Box 1179 Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 Dear President King and Board: Law Office �31 7,.65 4643 " p.2 2006 .`II � PATRICIA C. M.00RE C1� Attomey at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 t. �� +* Tel: (631) 765-4330 }F ° Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins i Secretary JUL 1 4 Re: GAIA Holistic Circle / OKI -do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#1000-38-07-7. I Thank you for meeting with the architect and me. In accordance with our discussion the following suggestions and comments were made at the June 21,2006 work session : Shipyard Lane could be terminated at the southerly terminus oftheproposed south entrance of the property. The Town presently has a guard rail at the end of Ship Yard Lane. This would enable drainage structures to be installed within the town road, landward of the current road end, in order to address road runoff which is presently entering the Bay. Due to the extensive drainage that is being undertaken on site, additional drains for the benefit of the Town capturing some road runoff presently entering the Bay could be undertaken by the applicant. This proposal is subject to the review and recommendation of the Town Engineer and Highway Superintendent. 2. Due to the historic use of the property and the existing conditions of the property and structures, the Board had no objection to the location of the buildings, as proposed on the site plan. 3. The Board had no objection to replacement of the dilapidated bulkhead along the Bay and the proposed construction of Rip Rap to match the rip rap on the adjacent property, subject to a permit. 4. We discussed the need of a retaining wall, landward of the rip rap, in order to match the existing elevation of the existing grade of the property. Due to the replacement of the lul 14 06 11:42a Moore Law Office 631 765 4643 p.3 bulkhead with Rip Rap, the Trustees had no objection to the retaining wall landward of the rip rap. 5. The condition of the existing bulkhead within the Private Boat Basin appears to be adequate and will not need replacement. Also the existing foundations are being reviewed for reuse. The existing foundations will require extensive engineering because the first floor of any habitable structure will require compliance with FEMA. 6. We confirmed that a Phase I and Phase II Environmental Assessment has been completed at the property and no hazardous substances were noted. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore cc: Denita O'Connor Cramer Consulting Group Jul 11 4 2000 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER• JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND July 11, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki -Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M -II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 10, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft, south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1; and RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i). If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 SUUjyol Southold, NY 11971 O�*QF OFFICE LOCATION: 411 l�f T Town Hall Annex co 54375 State Route 25 • ,O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) COUNT Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Proposed Site Plan for Gaia Holistic Circle, Oki -Do Ltd. Located approximately 3,278 ft. s/o New York State Road 25 at the s/e end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone: M -II, Marine II District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 10, 2006: WHEREAS, this proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 45-99 seats; a 1,987 sq. ft. managers residence with a 687 sq. ft. deck, a 1,373 sq. ft. pool house, a 7,205 sq. ft. maintenance and utility building; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft, south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38-7-7.1; and RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this Type I action pursuant to Part 617.4 (b) (6) (i). If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator 0 Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Architectural Review Committee Army Corps of Engineers t A PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 1 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 i e' Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 900Z July 10, 2006 t_ Ms. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and { Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site plan of GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do Ltd. SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: In accordance with Amy's request enclosed is a detailed project description to supplement the Long EAF Project Description previously submitted. This description includes the specific elements of the project being reviewed by the different involved agencies of the Town of Southold. Included and attached to EAF supplement: Exhibit A: Uses as described on site plan and with color code on reduced site plan Exhibit B: Project description for Trustees application Exhibit C: Color Elevations Exhibit D: letter dated January 10, 2006 from project architects which further describes implemented mitigation features of project. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. cc: Butt Otruba-O'Connor, Architects Cramer Consulting Group Very-trrr yours, L,,�-15atncia C. Moore .t 9 LEAF- SUPPLEMENT TO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION (page 2 A of 21) Part 1- project information Name of Action: GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do Ltd. Location of Action: e/s Shipyard Lane, East Marion, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Redevelopment of 18.7 acre waterfront industrial site with existing man made boat basin. The existing dilapidated buildings will be demolished and disturbed area used for construction of the uses described on Exhibit A: Exhibit A: Uses as described on site plan and with color code on reduced site plan Special Exception of Zoning Board of Appeals- Transient Motel Use Special Exception of Zoning Board of Appeals- Restaurant Private Marina within private boat basin Single Family dwelling The motel and restaurant use are permitted, by special exception. The Private Marina and the residence are permitted uses. Additional Variances are required: The design of the building includes roof arches which extend beyond the roof height. Height Variances have been filed for these architectural features, however if the arches are determined to be "spires" no variance is required. Area Variances are also required to construct within existing footprint adjacent to existing marine structures (Boat Basin within property and Rip Rap along Bay). Exhibit B: Project description for Trustees application Exhibit C: Color Elevations- Height Variance from Zoning Board of Appeals for roof design of arcs (if deemed "spires"- exempt from height requirements -no variance required) Exhibit D: letter dated January 10, 2006 from project architects which further describes implemented mitigation features of project. Property formerly an industrial use- Oyster Factory. A significant portion of the property was damaged by the industrial use. After the Oyster factory closed the buildings continued to be used for marine industrial uses. Prior to submission of the project, the owner removed garbage and several abandoned boats from within the building and yard. In addition, the owner secured the property which had suffered from vandalism and trespassers. The proposed redevelopment includes gardens and ponds in areas of disturbance and natural buffers along the non-developed shoreline. BUTT -OTR UBA-O'COR AOR ARCHITECTS, AIA 1062 Northern Boulevard, Roslyn, NY 11576 Tel. (516) 625-6625 Fax. (516) 625-6629 Danita Otruba-O'Connor Edward P. Butt I of t Uses - Separate site plan - color code uses lst Principal Use: Transient motel ( min. 3 acres required) - Total number of units is 114: 27 in motel building and 87 detached clusters ( clusters of 3 units and 5 units) (456,000 square feet) Special Permit required 100-121(B)(3) Transient Motel Accessory Uses: a. Restaurant in annex center (50 seats) b. office area (dedicated for motel use) c. Accessory "personal services" (27 rooms) d. Swimming pool (pool house) e. Maintenance & utility building 2nd Principal Use: Restaurant —Special Permit 100-121 (B)(1) 80,000 square feet require 72 seats for public, 126 for transient motel only Accessory- Gift shop & 2 offices • 3rd Use: Private marina 100-121 (2A) / 80,000 square feet (permitted use) 1. Private Boat slips for restaurant and transient motel guests (not for rent) 2. basin is 60,380 square feet under water + 19,618 upland 3. Office for marina 4th Use: Single family residence for owner— 80,000 square feet (permitted use) ,S�Xhth,t A 0 GALA project 1. Demolition of existing buildings within 100 feet of deteriorated bulkhead 2. Replacement of bulkhead with Stone Revetment (DEC recommendation) design to match adjacent Cleaves Point Condo 3. Construction of Motel and Restaurant within disturbed area (67.42 of property line/existing bulkhead) Existing Building within 54.9 feet of property line/bulkhead 4. Restaurant Annex and units within 100 feet of wetlands adjacent to Boat Basin 5. Repair/replace existing steel bulkhead in Boat Basin, as required with timber or vinyl bulkhead 6. Vegetation along adjacent area landward to Revetment to be planted 7. Maintenance Dredging of Boat Basin (2,500 c.y.) S. Creation of man made water feature 9. Underground Drainage structures 10. Parking area within 100 feet of Bay 11. Removing sanitary system, garbage (deteriorated vessels) and cement debris adjacent to bulkhead 12. Normal construction activity associated with redevelopment of site within 100 feet of wetland All activity in accordance with approved site plan. ZL 0 • BUTT•OTRUBA-O'COAWOR ARCHITECTS, AIA 1062 Northern Boulevard, Roslyn, NY 11576 Tel. (516) 625-6625 Fax (516) 625-6629 10 January 2006 Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Annex PO Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Gaia Holistic Circle Dear Mr. Semon: It is our pleasure to submit to you our application for the above referenced project. I would like to take this opportunity to tell you some additional information about the project that would not be indicated on the drawings at this time. As you are aware, the site is located on Gardiners Bay in East Marion. The 18.7 -acre site features a 1000 -foot shoreline along with an existing dredged marina basin. Currently several abandoned and dilapidated structures exist on the site. The overall site was used for commercial purposes and much of the land damaged. Our intention for the buildings and the site is to seek LEED green building certification. Upon completion, the project will rank among the most exceptional eco -friendly designs in the country. The project is currently registered with the USGBC under our firm. LEED certification provides a complete framework for assessing building performance, site usage and meeting sustainability goals. It not only addresses energy usage and efficiency but, restoration of the land and shoreline, sustainable site development, use of local materials and resources in the project, recycling, pollutants, water savings, materials selection and indoor environmental quality. Some of the items, which will be required and implemented for this project, are the following: • Alternative transportation: Two commuter shuttle vans will be provided for pickup of people coming to the site via public transportation. Therefore parking capacity has been sized not to exceed the minimum local zoning requirements. Some of the minimum will be land banked. • Bike storage racks are also provided to encourage non-invasive travel. • All parking on the site will be by valet only. Once a person arrives, they are encouraged not to use their car. • The parking areas themselves will be of permeable gravel material which will allow the natural absorption of surface waters, not add any runoff pollutants to the soil, reduce heat islands. 0 i • Electric carts will be used on site for getting around, but walking is preferred. • under developing the site, • The current site was abused as an industrial site. We will be restoring the land by adding water features, creating lovely Japanese gardens and adding landscaping. • We will keep as many existing trees as possible and all new landscaping will be indigenous and water efficient. • The shoreline and a large wetlands area will be kept natural and maintained. • The existing bulkhead along the bay will be replaced with a more natural stone rip - wrap to match the adjoining property. • The new building will be constructed in the location of the existing factory so as not to disturb more of the site than is necessary. • A state of the art septic system called Kromoglass will be used. In essence it puts potable water back into the site. • The majority of materials used will be local. • The materials and design style will blend with the site. Soft curves, natural colors. • All pathways inside the site will be natural materials. • Energy efficiency is addressed by means of solar hot water and rooftop gardens. The entire energy usage for the site will be considered renewable energy. • Recycling will occur. • Light pollution is kept to a minimum. Low level lighting will be used along to paths and parking areas. • Water saving fixtures in the units. • Reduction of all cfc-based refrigerants is implemented in the new hvac systems. Our direction is to provide a site in which the harmony of the buildings and the landscape reflects and restores a natural equilibrium. The client's objective is to reduce, recycle and return to the earth what is taken. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, kaVt—� Edward P. Butt Principal Danita Otruba-O'Connor Principal PATRICIA C. MOORE-. Attorney at Law n. 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 l Tel: (631) 765-4330 ��10 6 Fax: (631) 765-4643 t4' July 10, 2006 Ms. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and ~ Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site plan of GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do Ltd. SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: In accordance with Amy's request enclosed is a detailed project description to supplement the Long EAF Project Description previously submitted. This description includes the specific elements of the project being reviewed by the different involved agencies of the Town of Southold. Included and attached to EAF supplement: Exhibit A: Uses as described on site plan and with color code on reduced site plan Exhibit B: Project description for Trustees application Exhibit C: Color Elevations Exhibit D: letter dated January 10, 2006 from project architects which further describes implemented mitigation features of project. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. Very tral yours, atricia C. Moore cc: Butt Otruba-O'Connor, Architects Cramer Consulting Group Si' PF 0 0 LEAF- SUPPLEMENT TO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION (page 2 A of 21) Part 1- project information Name of Action: GAIA Holistic Circle/Oki-Do Ltd Location of Action: els Shipyard Lane, East Marion Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Redevelopment of 18.7 acre waterfront industrial site with existing man made boat basin. The existing dilapidated buildings will be demolished and disturbed area used for construction of the uses described on Exhibit A: Exhibit A: Uses as described on site plan and with color code on reduced site plan Special Exception of Zoning Board of Appeals- Transient Motel Use Special Exception of Zoning Board of Appeals- Restaurant Private Marina within private boat basin Single Family dwelling The motel and restaurant use are permitted, by special exception. The Private Marina and the residence are permitted uses. Additional Variances are required: The design of the building includes roof arches which extend beyond the roof height. Height Variances have been filed for these architectural features, however if the arches are determined to be "spires" no variance is required. Area Variances are also required to construct within existing footprint adjacent to existing marine structures (Boat Basin within property and Rip Rap along Bay). Exhibit B: Project description for Trustees application Exhibit C: Color Elevations- Height Variance from Zoning Board of Appeals for roof design of arcs (if deemed "spires"- exempt from height requirements -no variance required) Exhibit D: letter dated January 10, 2006 from project architects which further describes implemented mitigation features of project. Property formerly an industrial use- Oyster Factory. A significant portion of the property was damaged by the industrial use. After the Oyster factory closed the buildings continued to be used for marine industrial uses. Prior to submission of the project, the owner removed garbage and several abandoned boats from within the building and yard. In addition, the owner secured the property which had suffered from vandalism and trespassers. The proposed redevelopment includes gardens and ponds in areas of disturbance and natural buffers along the non-developed shoreline. 0 0 BUT T-OTRUR4-O'CONNO a A DC ITECT S, ALL 1062 Northern Boulevard, Roslyn, MY 11576 Tel. (516) 625-6625 Fcrx. (516) 625-6629 Danita Otruba-O'Connor Edward P. Butt 1 of l Uses - Separate site plan - color code uses 1st Principal Use Transient motel ( min. 3 acres required) - Total number of units is 114: 27 in motel building and 87 detached clusters ( clusters of 3 units and 5 units) (456,000 square feet) Special Permit required 100-121(B)(3) Transient Motel Accessory Uses: a. Restaurant in annex center (50 seats) b. office area (dedicated for motel use) C. Accessory "personal services" (27 rooms) d. Swimming pool (pool house) e. Maintenance & utility building 2nd Principal Use, Restaurant — Special Permit 100-121 (B)(1) 80,000 square feet require 72 seats for public, 126 for transient motel only Accessory- Gift shop & 2 offices 3rd Use: Private marina 100-121 (2A) / 80,000 square feet (permitted use) 1. Private Boat slips for restaurant and transient motel guests (not for rent) 2. basin is 60,380 square feet under water + 19,618 upland 3. Office for marina 4th Use: Single family residence for owner— 80,000 square feet (permitted use) 0 0 ;iA project 1. Demolition of existing buildings within 100 feet of deteriorated bulkhead 2. Replacement of bulkhead with Store Revetment (DEC recommendation) design to match adjacent Cleaves Point Condo 3. Constriction of Motel and Restaurant within disturbed area (67.42 of property line/existing bulkhead) Existing Building within 54.9 feet of property line/bulkhead 4. Restaurant Annex and units within 100 feet of wetlands adjacent to Boat Basin 5. Repair/replace existing steel bulkhead in Boat Basin, as required with timber or vinyl bulkhead 6. Vegetation along adjacent area landward to Revetment to be planted 7. Maintenance Dredging of Boat Basin (2,500 c.y.) S. Creation of man made water feature 9. Underground Drainage structures 10. Parking area within 100 feet of Bay 11. Removing sanitary system, garbage (deteriorated vessels) and cement debris adjacent to bulkhead 12. Normal constriction activity associated with redevelopment of site within 100 feet of wetland All activity in accordance with approved site plan. ■ :J .. :- y 3-1 0 0 1062 Norther Boulevard, Roslyn, NY 11576 Tel. (516) 625-6625 10 January 2006 Fax. (516) 625-6629 Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Annex PO Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Gaia Holistic Circle Dear Mr. Semon: It is our pleasure to submit to you our application for the above referenced project. I would like to take this opportunity to tell you some additional information about the project that would not be indicated on the drawings at this time. As you are aware, the site is located on Gardiners Bay in East Marion. The 18.7 -acre site features a 1000 -foot shoreline along with an existing dredged marina basin. Currently several abandoned and dilapidated structures exist on the site. The overall site was used for commercial purposes and much of the land damaged. Our intention for the buildings and the site is to seek LEED green building certification. Upon completion, the project will rank among the most exceptional eco -friendly designs in the country. The project is currently registered with the USGBC under our firm. LEED certification provides a complete framework for assessing building performance, site usage and meeting sustainability goals. It not only addresses energy usage and efficiency but, restoration of the land and shoreline, sustainable site development, use of local materials and resources in the project, recycling, pollutants, water savings, materials selection and indoor environmental quality. Some of the items, which will be required and implemented for this project, are the following: • Alternative transportation: Two commuter shuttle vans will be provided for pickup of People coming to the site via public transportation. Therefore parking capacity has been sized not to exceed the minimum local zoning requirements. Some of the minimum will be land banked. • Bike storage racks are also provided to encourage non-invasive travel. • All parking on the site will be by valet only. Once a person arrives, they are encouraged not to use their car. • The parking areas themselves will be of permeable gravel material which will allow the natural absorption of surface waters, not add any runoff pollutants to the soil, reduce heat islands. 0 0 • Electric carts will be used on site for getting around, but walking is preferred. • under developing the site, • The current site was abused as an industrial site. We will be restoring the land by adding water features, creating lovely Japanese gardens and adding landscaping. • We will keep as many existing trees as possible and all new landscaping will be indigenous and water efficient. • The shoreline and a large wetlands area will be kept natural and maintained. • The existing bulkhead along the bay will be replaced with a more natural stone rip - wrap to match the adjoining property. • The new building will be constructed in the location of the existing factory so as not to disturb more of the site than is necessary. • A state of the art septic system called Kromoglass will be used. In essence it puts potable water back into the site. • The majority of materials used will be local. • The materials and design style will blend with the site. Soft curves, natural colors. • All pathways inside the site will be natural materials. • Energy efficiency is addressed by means of solar hot water and rooftop gardens. The entire energy usage for the site will be considered renewable energy. • Recycling will occur. • Light pollution is kept to a minimum. Low level lighting will be used along to paths and parking areas. • Water saving fixtures in the units. • Reduction of all cfc-based refrigerants is implemented in the new hvac systems. Our direction is to provide a site in which the harmony of the buildings and the landscape reflects and restores a natural equilibrium. The client's objective is to reduce, recycle and return to the earth what is taken. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Edward P. Butt Danita Otruba-O'Connor Principal Principal �XAIh, f D P� SF �3S (AF rVkJ SOUTHOLD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, W 11971-0959 Phone(631)76 -.a.c „; . uwtriY�ccosr,ssva, Fax (631) -3 DATE: June 26, 2006 TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board FROM: Neboysha R. Brashich, RE: Proposed Oki -Do Ltd. Project - n7 Iri 'T n �Vf Jur; 2 2006 Lane, East Marion The Transportation Commission appreciates the opportunity to review the plans, engineering reports and traffic studies related to the proposed Oki -Do Ltd. project, located on the south side of State Route 25 in East Marion. Generally speaking, the Commission is concerned about the traffic which will flow in and out of this area, particularly given the anticipated increased movement of delivery trucks, mini -bus shuttles and restaurant usage by the general public. Nevertheless, no restrictions will be imposed. The Commission reviewed the engineering data and the Site Plan as it relates to transportation Issues and offers the following: 1. The Commission Is in agreement with the State DOT office conclusions concerning widening and providing two (2) egress lanes at the northbound Shipyard Lane approach with SR 25. In addition, there Is agreement with the proposal to install a SR 25 westbound left turn lane at the approach to Shipyard Lane. 2. The Commission strongly recommends that access to the Oki -Do property along Gillette Drive be restricted to the senior staff of the GAZA Hollistic Center, in addition to being designated as an emergency exit route only. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please let us know. Cc: Amy Ford, Planning Board To: Neboysha Brashich, Chairman Fax Number: 631.734.6235 Southold Transportation Commission From AmyFord�-- No. of Pages: 4 (total) Date: 19 June 2006 SC IM #: 1000-38-7-7.1 Re: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion As per our meeting this morning, please find attached a copy of the New York State Department of Transportation letter in reference to the above project dated April 18, 2006 Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything further. Thank you. MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBEV P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE _``�q soU%hrO lO Southold, NY 11971 Chair �� OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR CA 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON �p� 0 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND I�COUN1' *�. Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FAX COVER LETTER To: Neboysha Brashich, Chairman Fax Number: 631.734.6235 Southold Transportation Commission From AmyFord�-- No. of Pages: 4 (total) Date: 19 June 2006 SC IM #: 1000-38-7-7.1 Re: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion As per our meeting this morning, please find attached a copy of the New York State Department of Transportation letter in reference to the above project dated April 18, 2006 Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything further. Thank you. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS • Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net S� Mailing Address: at Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809 • Fax (631) 765-9064 Re: Oki -Do Ltd — GAIA 1000-39-7-7.1 June 14, 2006 JUN 1 S 2006 Dear Ms. Moore: 3 _ �...,• In reply to your inquiry of yesterday to our office, please be advised that reviews of the above application have been commenced and are under a coordinated review with involved departments and agency technical staff. As of this date, reviews are continuing, and once the LWRP certification and SEQRA declaration have been issued, a public hearing for the Special Exception and Variance applications may be calendared. Sincerely yours, Ruth D. Oliva Chairwoman JUN 1 S 2006 Dear Ms. Moore: 3 _ �...,• In reply to your inquiry of yesterday to our office, please be advised that reviews of the above application have been commenced and are under a coordinated review with involved departments and agency technical staff. As of this date, reviews are continuing, and once the LWRP certification and SEQRA declaration have been issued, a public hearing for the Special Exception and Variance applications may be calendared. Sincerely yours, Ruth D. Oliva Chairwoman Jun 13 06 12:58 Mo• Law Office �� m1110� �-J_ ll7seu d� PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51025 Main Road Scathold, New York 1.1971 �LGJ,eP f StQ� � i (p 1-o 6 631 0 4643 P.l Tei: (631) 765-4335 Sax: (631) 765-4643 March 1, 2006 Town zoning Board of Appeals Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Oki -Do ltd. -GAZA 1000-39-7-7.1 Dear Mrs. Oliva: Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretary JUN 13 2006 we submitted the application for a Special Exception and variances on March 1, 2006. Pursuant to Town Law Section 274 B-3 a hearing is to be scheduled within 62 days of receipt of the application. You asked that we filed the application with the Southold Town Trustees. On March 14,2006, in accordance with your instructions, we filed the application with the Southold Town Trustees. The application is also before the Southold Town Planning Board, but they can not act on this application until you review the Special Exception. The Trustees were awaiting guidance from Planning, and the Planning Board can not proceed with their application until the Special Exception and variances are approved. Therefore, the hearing before your board is imperative. My client is very anxious to proceed with this project, your prompt attention is requested. r.r -u i�ruay yours, Pati, cia C. Moore cc: Dr. Hillyer L��S PLANNING BOARD MEMBER JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HAND DELIVERED AT THE SOUTHOLD TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING June 19, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. Southold Transportation Commission Neboysha Brashich, Chairman 175 Emory Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Oki -Do Ltd. Zoning District: MII District 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCIM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Brashich: As discussed at our most recent meeting, please find enclosed a copy of the Traffic Impact Study, last revised February 2006, for the above referenced project. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, Amy F Senior Cc: File • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 q so�ryolo Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G Q '� 54375 State Route 25 • �O OIyCOUi�,� (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HAND DELIVERED AT THE SOUTHOLD TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEETING June 19, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. Southold Transportation Commission Neboysha Brashich, Chairman 175 Emory Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Oki -Do Ltd. Zoning District: MII District 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCIM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Brashich: As discussed at our most recent meeting, please find enclosed a copy of the Traffic Impact Study, last revised February 2006, for the above referenced project. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, Amy F Senior Cc: File May 20, 2006 E • MARION FIRE DISTRICT Board of Fire Commissioners PO Box 131 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939 (631) 477-0163 Fax (631) 477-8310 Email: EMFDistrict@optonline.net Amy Ford Senior Planner Town of Southold Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Oki -Do Ltd 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Ms. Ford, After a careful and extensive review of the enclosed plans by the Chiefs of the East Marion Fire Department and the Board of Fire Commissioners please consider the following recommendations: 1) All interior pathways are increased to 12' wide. 2) There should be unimpeded vehicle access to the marina and a standpipe should be installed in the basin. 3) Two additional hydrants should be installed a) Behind the restaurant and in front of the docks. b) At the Northwest corner by the electric transformer. Both should have a minimum capacity of 500 gpm. 4) Notification of any chemical or hazardous material storage, and a list of the contents. 5) Any second and third story living quarters should have a standpipe water supply service. In addition the Board request that this development does not receive tax-exempt status. Thank you for your cooperation. Ve��rygqtr��uly your , 1 Walter Gaipa Fire District Secretary D MAY 9 4 inns I After a careful and extensive review of the enclosed plans by the Chiefs of the East Marion Fire Department and the Board of Fire Commissioners please consider the following recommendations: 1) All interior pathways are increased to 12' wide. 2) There should be unimpeded vehicle access to the marina and a standpipe should be installed in the basin. 3) Two additional hydrants should be installed a) Behind the restaurant and in front of the docks. b) At the Northwest corner by the electric transformer. Both should have a minimum capacity of 500 gpm. 4) Notification of any chemical or hazardous material storage, and a list of the contents. 5) Any second and third story living quarters should have a standpipe water supply service. In addition the Board request that this development does not receive tax-exempt status. Thank you for your cooperation. Ve��rygqtr��uly your , 1 Walter Gaipa Fire District Secretary DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Di STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY May 3, 20 SVIOF ,�qF Town of Southold Planning �I �_ 53095 Main Road - P.O. Boxx 1 1179 tSouthold sown Southold, NY 11971 Planni Board Atm: Amy Ford, Senior Planner Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan whicr veMbbeeen submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or inter -community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan Oki -Do Ltd. Comments: SCTM No. 1000-38-07-7.1 • The most landward limit of wetland was last field flagged 8/12/03. As wetland lines tend to migrate over time, the most landward limit of wetland should be re -flagged in the field by a qualified expert and represented on all final plans, etc. All wetland setbacks should be readjusted accordingly. • The applicant should review "Study of Man -Made Ponds in Suffolk County, NY" Suffolk County Department of Planning 12/1990 (copy enclosed), prior to final design with the Town. • Landscaping on the subject property should be non -fertilizer dependent "native" plant species. • All drainage should be kept on site and not flow into wetlands or public right-of-way. NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action(s) associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, Thomas Isles, AICP Director of Planning Andre Al Chief Planner APF:cc LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR . P. O. BOX 6100 . (631) 853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR April 18, 2006 � SF ii -EkCEL910R STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGION TEN`' 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL U!P9 AY HAUPPAUGE, NEW YO1*1T'B°lY'"' www.dot.state.ny.Vs ,. 4 �FH jM I �DJ1 Ms. Amy Ford, Senior Planner Town of Southold Town Hall P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11791 Dear Ms. Ford: Your March 23, 2006 Submission Oki -Do Ltd. — Holistic Center Hotel / Restaurant Traffic Impact Studv (TIS) Dated 4/05. Revised 2/06 Route 25, East Marion SCTM 1000-38-7-7.1 Our Case No. 06-116P This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. We have reviewed the recommendations made in the TIS concerning proposed improvements on State Route (SR 25). We agree with the recommendation concerning widening and providing two (2) egress lanes at the northbound Shipyard Lane approach with SR 25. We also agree with the proposal to install a SR 25 westbound left turn lane at the approach to Shipyard Lane. Any work proposed on SR 25 will require the applicant to secure a Highway Work Permit from us. This may also require pavement widening / reconstruction. Four (4) sets of plans shall be developed and submitted to us for our review of any proposed work on the State highway right-of-way. The site plans shall include all of the information noted on the attached checklist. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or I495, whichever is farther south, north to Long Island Sound. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject case number. The plans must also include the County tax map number. Ms. Amy Ford April 18, 2006 Page 2 Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, I//)///7SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Ms. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson, Town of Southold Ms. Wendy Brodsky, Long Island North Shore Heritage Area Planning Commission SAS:MDW:SME SITE PLAN REOUIREATS CHECKLIST: • X`A. Location and dimensions of existing highway pavement, curb, sidewalk, median, median openings, guide rail, utilities, signs (including size and text), pavement markings, bus stops, overhead and underground traffic signal equipment, right-of-way lines, controlled access lines and property lines. X B. Existing and proposed buildings, appurtenances and drive-through windows. X C. Design features, referencing the latest edition of the NYS Standard Specifications, to be incorporated in proposed work: X 1. Driveway pavement type and dimensions. X 2. Radii of driveway returns and other points of curvature. X 3. Driveway grades or profiles, indicating low point on private property. X 4. Angle of driveways relative to roadway center line. X 5. Dimensions of roadside control islands and driveway medians. X 6. Dimensions of curb and sidewalk relative to pavement edge. X 7. Details of internal traffic circulation, including proposed signs, pavement markings and traffic signal equipment. X 8. North arrow and scale on each applicable sheet. X D. Size, type and grade of existing and proposed drainage features. Plastic pipe is not permitted within State right-of-way. X E. Distance from each existing and proposed driveway to each adjacent driveway and cross street, including adjacent property lines and streets and driveways opposite the site. X F. Maintenance and protection of traffic plans. A Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan must be provided for work on Route 25. The plan must include the note "All lanes must be open to traffic before 10 AM and after 3 PM. No lane closings are permitted on weekends or holidays. Nighttime lane closings will not be permitted without prior approval from the State Permit Inspector." _G. Traffic signal plans must be shown on a separate sheet including pavement markings, turn lanes, driveways, sidewalks and pedestrian ramps, crosswalks, buildings, poles, power supply, pullboxes, conduit, controller, head layout including face numbering, detection, right-of-way lines and signing. All work must be referenced to the latest edition of the NYS Standard Specifications. The plans must show existing features, such as drainage and utilities, which may conflict with the proposed signal. Tables of Operations, Clearances, Switchpacks, Input Wiring and Loop Wiring must be included along with a Phasing Diagram and Estimate of Quantities. X H. Aerial photograph of the site and environs. X I. Beginning and ending reference markers. 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND April 12, 2006 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 n PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Mrs. Moore: Zoning District: MII District SCTM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 Please find attached a copy of a letter from Suffolk County Water Authority regarding the above referenced project. As indicated in the attached letter, additional information is necessary in order to complete a thorough review of the project. Please supply Suffolk County Water Authoritywith the necessary information in order for them to complete their review. We ask that copies of all correspondence be sent to this office for our records. Please do not hesitate this office should you have any questions. Sincerely, Amy Ford Senior Planner Cc: Stephen M. Jones, Chief Executive Officer, Suffolk County Water Authority File MAILING ADDRESS: 0 f SOU % P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G Q '� 54375 State Route 25 • �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) �fC,oum Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Mrs. Moore: Zoning District: MII District SCTM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 Please find attached a copy of a letter from Suffolk County Water Authority regarding the above referenced project. As indicated in the attached letter, additional information is necessary in order to complete a thorough review of the project. Please supply Suffolk County Water Authoritywith the necessary information in order for them to complete their review. We ask that copies of all correspondence be sent to this office for our records. Please do not hesitate this office should you have any questions. Sincerely, Amy Ford Senior Planner Cc: Stephen M. Jones, Chief Executive Officer, Suffolk County Water Authority File Stephen M. Jones Chief Executive Officer 0 SUFFOLK COUNTY Administrative Offices: 4060 April 6, 2006 Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 0 �a EC�0 APR .. --Fag: (63ly-S63-0370 raru�M�n APR 10 2006 Southold, NY 11971 Re: SEQRA - Oki -Do Ltd, 238 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Our agency, the Suffolk CountyWaterAuthority is in receipt of site plan application and Part One of the EAF for the Oki -Do Ltd., Holistic Center project. - In order for the Suffolk County Water Authority to reasonably review this project, our agency is requesting that adequate information on projected year round water demands be provided to us for further review. Based on the information provided and the nature of the project, additional demands on our water supply system may require upgrading of existing water mains supplying the site. In absenceofthis additional information we will be withholding a water availability letter until such time we have received the year round water demand projections and have reviewed the data. Should you wish to discuss this matter further, please contact my office at 631-563-0219. Ve ruly yo s, M ones tive ffier SMJ:kk - � L SUFFOLK COUNTY A -AUTR6R TY Stephen M. Jones Administrative Offices: 4060 SAse Highwa Oakdale,-NeW York 11769-0 1 Chief Executive Officer 6 1 5E-W; Fac(63 )563-0370 April 6, 2006 Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson APR i 0 2006 Planning Board Office Town of Southold southold Town P.O. Box 1179 Pfannin 8card y "t Southold, NY 11971 Re: SEQRA - Oki-Do Ltd, 238 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Our agency, the Suffolk County Water Authority is in receipt of a site plan application and Part One of the EAF for the Oki -Do Ltd., Holistic Center project. In order forthe Suffolk County Water Authority to reasonably review this project, our agency is requesting that adequate informationon projected year round water demands be provided to us for further review. Based on the information provided and the nature of the project, additional demands on our water supply system may require upgrading of existing water mains supplying the site. In absence ofthis additional information we will be withholding a water availability letter until such time we have received the year round water demand projections and have reviewed the data. Should you wish to discuss this matter further, please contact my office at 631-563-0219. Ve lyVnes h f Exer 61uupq Page I of I Semon, Bruno From: Chic Voorhis [cvoorhis@nelsonpope.com] Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 6:03 PM To: Ford, Amy Cc: Semon, Bruno; Terry, Mark; 'Ashley Marciszyn' Subject: Oki -Do Amy, We received the information transmitted in your letter of March 23`d and have commenced review. Bruno had mentioned that this was coming in. It is obviously a fairly large project. Please let me know if you have begun coordinated review, how you classified the action, and when the Planning Board will assume lead agency. I will put together a scope and cost. For now I will log in, have an engineer review the traffic study, review the EAF Part I, review the Phase I ESA and overview the site plan. Next item is to get proposal to you. Chic Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747 (631)427-5665 fax: (631) 427-5620 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND March 31, 2006 Kimberly Kennedy Suffolk County Water Authority 4060 Sunrise Ffighway Oakdale, New York 11769 `n PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Ms. Kennedy: Zoning District: MII District SCIM #/ : 1000-38.-7-7.1 As per your recent phone request, please find attached the full environmental assessment form for the above mentioned project. I apologize if it was not included in the referral packet. Please do not hesitate to contact me should youhave any questions or need anything further. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Amy Fo Senior Planner Cc: File Enc: Full environmental assessment form MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Of soU%hrOlO Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: 4 Town Hall Annex AQ '� 54375 State Route 25 • �O a4l (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) coU Southold, NY i Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Ms. Kennedy: Zoning District: MII District SCIM #/ : 1000-38.-7-7.1 As per your recent phone request, please find attached the full environmental assessment form for the above mentioned project. I apologize if it was not included in the referral packet. Please do not hesitate to contact me should youhave any questions or need anything further. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Amy Fo Senior Planner Cc: File Enc: Full environmental assessment form PIS F) t I UIFI: RS_ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND March 30, 2006 n PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Transportation Commission Neboysha Brashich, Chairman 175 Emory Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Old -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Mr. Brashich: Zoning District: MII District SCIMM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 Enclosed please find one (1) site plan and site plan use diagram last revised March 10, 2006 prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects. This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house With 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38.-7-7.1. In addition, enclosed are the EAF, site plan application and informational letter from Butt, Otruba- O'Connor Architects. The enclosed information is being referred to you for comments and approval. Thank you for your cooperation. Ve rulyyours Amy For Senior Planner Cc: File Enc: 1 site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10, 2006. Attachments MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 oF souryolo Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G Q 54375 State Route 25 '� • �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Cow Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Transportation Commission Neboysha Brashich, Chairman 175 Emory Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: Old -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Mr. Brashich: Zoning District: MII District SCIMM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 Enclosed please find one (1) site plan and site plan use diagram last revised March 10, 2006 prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects. This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house With 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM # 1000-38.-7-7.1. In addition, enclosed are the EAF, site plan application and informational letter from Butt, Otruba- O'Connor Architects. The enclosed information is being referred to you for comments and approval. Thank you for your cooperation. Ve rulyyours Amy For Senior Planner Cc: File Enc: 1 site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10, 2006. Attachments 0 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631) 444-0403 FAX: (631) 444-0360 RESPONSE TO AGENCY REFERRAL REQUEST March 27, 2006 Amy Ford Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Agency Referral Request Proposed Site Plan for Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Town Dear Ms. Ford: ' Please advise the applicant that the proposed project will likely req u a a+i a Wetfan'cTs peri' i from this office . Sin erely, Sherri Aicher Environmental Analyst PATRA C. MOORE, ATTORNEY 4 LAW 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 DATE [:MAR2 �� TO SUBJECT 3 2006d Town;Roa;d J s SIGNED Mar 23 06 08:5Ba Moore Law Office 631 765 4643 p.1 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax ,53')765-4643 FACSIMILE 9 -0)M2 -SHEET Tne (1&:pcs�,vmt;r+s,rr9 mis a. eirrnN ra rsrnrss+OR COrfain corfidantia"nformation from Patricia C. Moore. This nfom, atmn is L'rtenGad sore!; 51r use by tha indivfduai ar,#rFy named as the recipient hersof ifyou are not fire ntenBecr r-aciar, : 're aovare /bat any diisrtosure. cony'ino, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmissr00 !s ri-)ttrbited. !r' you 1:'e:ve received this transrnresir-i in sncr, please ^otifv us try telephone mmediate a :x n'e r;ar , rranra to r?t. je e this transmission at na Cost to you. TO: ,gym crd-Southald Town Plants -c Board FAX NO: RE'. OKI -130 DATE: THS RSDAY�3r'23 k TOTAL NW4BER. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET IF TRAN&OiSSIDN IS FAULTY OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CALL. BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. CLIENT NAP✓lE: OPERATOR: -- Good morning, Anv Attached hereto is the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form. If you need anything fWher, please do not hesitate to call. Betsy Mar 23 06 00:56a Moore Law Office 631 765 4643 p.2 is iz Town of Southold I,WRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. iNsTRUC IONS 1. 11ptt anu fee pCn Ws0 ici!udmg Totvr..,t Southold aGenctcs .i:al3 o -m IPtc this Cc,1F for -' opy cd a tons Vol 2re suojcot ci the `town of Southend wstrr'ror[ Consistency i2et new Law. - This sc<smont is cnterded u7 su}.ptcmetn othcs mfi+tmtttnn used b} a Tcsn of Southc id agcnty r.u`' • C a detemtutauot ct consrstcncy. Except n ins cxetnpr scum me uding Sui!ding P n ad other inineoterizi p emits not located within tbe. Coastal Fmsion _-Iazard Area. Q'C\lJ C� Bet r t mvenig the Gucsuon in Section C the preparer of this form. Ohould review w the ezempt "' V m!ner afj t } st, {ohctc s cod € pt•tnatien< ^tf eae7t policy or z.ned a th€? own oi`Southold g emal s alter out R v n>i zUian Program. A proposed action will be w ti .wed as to its significant venefi ;a, ai. adw, nt e le to upon rhe ocasial area (which u��fudes all +=f Sc,nOiold Totvnl. P tt3. 11�lfany la _n in 4)t tion C' of tau; fomt is answered "Yos' , then the proposed let wo may affect titer i. tim nt' NU pc li) stands da and conditions t ontamcd !n the con istency review t lcoald be anal. ed in more detail aac. if ncec�sary, modified o6or to making ,v a. cjepexkTjt on tt: t c cs conistcnl < then stmtun canto Nv �tieable with she I WL2P policy }, w'9( lards avd canuit )ns Han action cannot b t ^trifled e c-Fansixteat ttth thr LWRP policy s.✓' stam!azds and undtnom it straw not be undertaken. A co j ri (he A alp n is a% -Ai !able in the Following places ontire at the Town ttfsouthold's website (;nt t»idto am roc thYar's.n+ ). the P.oard of Ltnstees Oft -ice, the Planning Depar ment, all local Imides and re, Towa #"Lrk's office. A, DESCRIPTION O1: SITE AND PROPOSER ACTION SCT N'Iti 1000-38-0-7.1 AGENS': Patricia C. 'Moore Esd- 51424 blain Road, Southold- NY 11971 r'.te Application has been submitted to (el'teck appropriate response): Town Board Cl Planning rept. ❑ Building DEEL Boaid c.fTrustees r, ] Zoning Board of Appeals Category of Tot rt of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a; Action tmdertaken da c,ly by Tot=�r. agency (e.g. capital construction, planning acFivit'y, agency rcguintion, land transtction) L b) F'inaaticial assismnce. (t S. grant, loan, subcid}i fe) T enr.it, approval, licensa. certifi- ion: 7 "Type: Special pe rrnitiecception Mar 23 06 OOi578 Moore Law Ofriee 631 765 4643 p.3 Navim and exienl of action' Proposed removal of an abandoned industrial buiidin y(s) and the construction of a transient hotel complex Kith st rooms. restaurant [najascr's iesidenco various accessory structures (swnmmma pool, meeting roams Gazebos maintenance buildinar etc.) refurbished boat basin/slips, creation of lak+!water feature landscaping, reranstruction of existing bulkheadtpS, dred?inz,retnov a n` drterio: atcd shoreline rnteetion structures. construction at new shoreline p[-otecticn st itactures construction of sewage treatment facility —Ona 18.75.15 acre site. LOCRoon of action: eastside of Shipyard Lane. north of Gardiners Bay near CkRle. Pnint. East Afarion. Site acreage: 18.711; acres Prc*va land csa: AbandoneWdeteriorated indust'rial_buildinas mergrown fields'second growth woods dredged boat basin_ Present zomn classification' Marine ll if en appiica>_iau tc§r tic piopc,scd action has been filed with the Town of Souihold agenic}, tlte. f !lou:n+ information shall be provided: ,,3) vsune of applicant: OW-Do.Ltd. td c/o Patricia C. Moore Esc=. (.!'rl �iaiting address: 51020 Alain Road. Southold NY 119711 {r.'} Tcleplio;e. number_ (631) 7654330 (d) App) icati4lc nI8Tihed-, ifany. NA \vill the action N: directly undertakcu, recyt:irc funding, or approval by a state, or fedeMl gcncy' p,tio tf yes, which state or federal agency: Tn« � Fno�i�•r � t. `� Mar 23 06 00;50a Moore Law Office • DEVELOPED COAST POLICY 631 765 4643 p.4 • Policy I. Postcr a pattern orderelorinenr in the rovvn of Southold that enhances cornmunih✓ characaer, preserves open spai c, makes cjju lent use nfinfrustruchaC, makes benePlcial use of a croa,tal location, and minimizes adverse Effects of eier clopmcm. See LFDRP Section iLt - policie>: Pcrgc 2.1br evaluation criteria. r - Yes' vU Net App 1ic Lb I e_ Discussion isf anpr:r,,n: to: The proposed project will remove abandoned. dereiorated buildi-t s that are a significant impact on the community character. They will be replaced with an attractive unique structure and use The existing deteriorated shoreline structure- will be repaired and or replaced to provide the needed interstructure for the maria a dependant uses of the facility. The proposed use is cowistant with the zoning of the site with a special permit. The project will promote the goal of tourism to the Town of Southold and provide an end_destination for persons who might not other wise visit the Townthus providing economic Lenefits to the sitrrrnmdjnt commtanities and commerical centers. Policy 3. protec. enc.' precrl v hr'sloric and ar chaenlog cul resources ojthe IWSocdhi>lcl:auLNiiPPolicies Pages .itlrorgh6_for c}'aluadorrcriteria 1"es l� �u ❑ NOT :'kpplieable Discussion t11 s33p:,rr•-Itt;' The site is not identified as area of archeological sensitivity or on theNittiapa] Register on the map produced by NYS Dept. Of State. Division of ioasia€ Resour a The site has been previously been significantly disturbed. The existing huildin,„s on site at a pat historic and are in a state of deterioration. The inventory rc ared by SPLI.A for the Town does not list the site or structures. AedicF c3. F.ihanc e i=i_ tic r quality :zrd protect scenic resout•ces througlaou., rhe Toive) of Solal•ali Slu,,t,FF'fi P Scrlior ill - Pcr:zi;cy f'zoes 6 through 'far eu°ahead an c-!-dter-ia Yes 2 � o ', ha: Appbcah;e f7iscussion The existing deteriorated industial building have a signiticam detrimental visual i npaet on the area. The existing shoreline protection dei ices are also deteriorated and large amounts of debris exists along the shoreline and site. The proposed proiccl will remove the existent buildings and debris and old structures alort tate shoreline ,A new building(s) of unique and attractive destagn trill b„ comi-ucled The shoreline will he revitalized with new protecting structure",. of the seine design as thane: to the community to the west. Native piantine material will be installed adjacent to the main building an the western portion of the site The eastern portion of the site adjacent to the water, will remain i_fts v.t�iter. The detached units will be Mar 23 06 05:01a Moore Law Office • 631 765 4643 p.5 • situated around a lake! v iter feature and significauly landscaped to provide and attractive setting Witile the proposed protea will alter the existing visual setting, the change is con%iidef-ed an improvement over the existing visuat blight that exists on the Site, Mar 23 06 09:02a Moore Law Office 631 765 4643 • • NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. linimizc loss of iift, structures, and nalural resotrrces from flootiNg and erosion See L WRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 ti:r-cugh 15 for evaluation criteria Yes 7 No ❑ Not Applicable ❑ Discussion (f opymrrivC . The proposed structure(s) will be constructed to meet the flood elevation for the site. The existing deteriorated shoreline protection will he removed and replaced with rip -rap that will provide protection from erosion as well as provide habitat within the stones, matching the existing protection_ structures to the west. Native planting will be installed above the rip -rap to provide additional protection. The natural area on the east side of the existing boat basin will remain in its natural state. The dune vegetation in this area will provide protection to the other aspects of the project. Additional native plantings will be installed as required to colonize areas of bare earth. The deteriorated boat basin will be repaired and restored to provide a functional facility. Policy 5. Protect and unpr uve nater qualily and suppiv hi the Trion € l-Sottlhold. See L 112 Section W - Policies Pagzs 16 ih! uugh 21 for evaluation criteria Yes (D No E 'rot Applicable f Disetmion t;rnpt, opr;acr): A state of the art sewage treatment £acilty will be installed as past of the proiect. All necessary permits will be obtained from the SCDHS for swage disposal 'l he existing deteriorated sanitary system will he removed. The site was inspected for the possibility of toxic and hazardous materials. All potential sources were removed from the site and disposed of in accordance with regulations. The existing structures. raved areas, etc. has direct discharges for runoff into the surface water. Coder the proposed project these will be removed and on site recharge will be provided. Native and low -fertilizer dependant plant species will be used in the design and landscaping to reduce. nitrogen loading from the site. Policy 6. Ptotect and restore the quality andfu;etion aft)7e Town qf Sbutkold ecosostems including _`.,'givflcant Coastal Fisfr and Wildlife I'labiiais and i+tdands. Sce LiTRP Scrdun IN - polri:.ie:;',' Pa, er 22 Aroue!a ,l,,t")r• >vcauntion criieria. 1'es � Nc `_ \ut Applicable, [] D1SLn8'4iUr1 The site is adjacent to Gardiners Bav and contains a dredged boat basin. The existing boat basin has shoaled closed which has resulted in stagnate conditions. The proposcd restoration of the boat basin will allow for tidal action within it that will improve water quality. The existing tidal wetlands on site will ho be disturbed. The siiLmificant amount of debris with the wetlands and s!±or€lire a.renj wih tr removed. The proposed use of rip -rap will provide increase p.6 Mar 23 06 09:05a Moore Law Ofrice 631 765 4643 p.7 0 • habitat value over t.ic• previous hulkheading along the shore line. An existing osprey nest will remain and a natural buffer of undisturbed vegetation will remain around it The project will create a lakelwater feature that is not currently on the site. No freshwater wetlands are in the area of the site. and the creation of the lake/water feature will provide additional habitat not presently avalible- Folic'., 7. uir qua/rzY in the Town afSowhuld. See U RP Section IIf - Pn 32 lhroagh 341t°.zr n-aluart n criteria_ See Section III - Policies Page -s; 34 l in-ezrglr 2S_.>,>r e val aaticn: cri terirz yt ! \'c, 7-1 Not Appl;cal,ie El Discussion Polity S. in To rvii, of Southold! from solid v-a-c,c and a_r.rlacr,ti rr'starac ar.' icarts cs SeeLrFRPSection 1/!-1'<rlirie ,`P:r=cs 34 thrrough ;•SJi_rr cval,rtrtron criteria. yc;, [. , No (_ i ;NoH Arplicahle Lviscussion (�t `phis proieet is beiug designed as a "Green Project" unders the LEER Dro<manz. as such. a key componant will address the handling of solid waste and recycling. The removai of the existing structures on with will be a part of this proeram that will include but not limited to recyling scrap metal and crushing of conereto to use is construct on for the facility. As noted previousiv, a Phase I and ll Environmental Site Assessment was carried out on the site to determine if and hazardous waste was on the site. Suspect sources were investigated and properiv addressed Mar 23 06 09:06a Moore Law Office 631 765 4643 p.6 Is 0 PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 4. F9vvide %or,ovblic access to, and reereazional ss e o coastal craters, public lands. and punlie reaoea ccs ofzfae1'o5rn ofSeuzJaold. See I-1fRP Section L'I - Polici«>s; Pages : S thlvzz, r,'� 4E for eval aolion criteria_ Yes Z No ❑ Not Appbeable Discussion i,i cpprarriam>. The proposed action will provide a facility available to the �' oubiic. The caistina Croat basin that vvas previous a private industrial facility, and end of Shipyard Lane xvill he preserved and visual impacts caused by the existing deteriorated industrial structures will be removed. Mar 23 OS 09:08a Moore Law Office 831 765 4643 1* • W'ORK1;9Yi COAST POUCZE'S Policy 10. Pr-otecr Southc ki's vater-cdewncdem uses and prornele siting of ne-av water-d-,pertcrenl toes iH suitaLle Ioc°aiio s. See GARP Section III - Policies, Pages 47 through 56Iiir evaluation criier•ia. Yes , No G1 Not Applieah;e j 1 Discussion r;fuppropraae>: The deteriorated, private industrial boat basin will be restored to provide a facility for transient boaters The proposed transient hotel complex will provide the public with a facility adiacent to the ivater that is consistent with the uolics standards as listed in Table 1 of the LWRP. Polis H. 0—mote syswb;ab1c ve aflivhi ig marine retourccs in d onglslandSound. Etre r'ecunic Es°wm.j, and Toll n waters. Sec°. I W"RI'Section Rt- Policies: Panes 5%:hrouah hI./&)- Yes j'br Yes - No {- Nui ApplIc ole [_ Discussion The restoration of the tidal action in the boat basin will imgrcwe Water quality in it. ''his will promote and enhance the marine resources found on the site. Policy 12 proxor a-W.2cidt'o ; hutds is the row -n tit .Sowhotd Sem LT"I?p Section 111 - Policies; Pg6es S:' tlrrnt.gd GS,tir,• ccctdualion criteria. Yes L I No jr Not Apphli ublc [l Discussion li i=,n;snnriat�j: policy 13 Prontntc at prr,p utter er+ and clevelopntertt c f ertergt ertru. tnAterad resaur es. See 1 URI' _ "' 'w" III - Poi :;os; P _s 65 th, ottgi; 6,3for valauutoa criieria NY es In No _, Not t\fr;,licabio ❑ Diseassior; i;, appre; crane.- :.as stated previously, the proieet is being designed as a "Green Prgjeci" under the LEED program. The proieet is bein- designed to use various sources of alternate. ener'n' as part of its operation, as well as many enertn saying deyiies and techiclues. *cora cif Tm n htrm *sated on 2.1 lit>6 P.9 PLANNING BOARD MEMBEV JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MEMORANDUM To: 0 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Mark Teny, LWRP Coordinator From: Amy Ford, Senior Planner/. Date: March 23, 2006 Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC- Stony Brook'' New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Architectural Review Comtnittee Army Corps of Engineers RE: Agency referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXV 100-254 Review Procedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concems comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: The site plan status is a revise Site Plan. Below is the site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCIM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house with 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCI'M # 1000-38-7-7.1. P.O. Box 1179 sooTyo Southold, NY 11971 010f OFFICE LOCATION: T * Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 G Q ',� • (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Aa�O Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Mark Teny, LWRP Coordinator From: Amy Ford, Senior Planner/. Date: March 23, 2006 Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC- Stony Brook'' New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Architectural Review Comtnittee Army Corps of Engineers RE: Agency referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXV 100-254 Review Procedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concems comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: The site plan status is a revise Site Plan. Below is the site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCIM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house with 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCI'M # 1000-38-7-7.1. Attached is a copy of the site plan application, site plan use diagram, architectural elevation drawing and informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects for your information and review. Thank you in advance. cc: File Enc: Attachments 'Fl site plan prepared byButt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10, 2006. PLANNING BOARD MEMBEII JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND March 23, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD East Marion Fire District Walter Gaipa, Secretary & Treasurer P.O. Box 131 East Marion, New York 11939 RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Gaipa: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan and site plan use diagram last revised March 10, 2006 and one (1) architectural plan last revised February 13, 2006, both prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects. This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/ restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house with 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MEI Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCIM # 1000-38.-7-7.1. The enclosed revised site plan and application is being referred to you again for fire access review and for your recommendations as the enclosed plan has undergone revisions. Thank you for your cooperation. Veryt yyours, Amy o Senior Planner CC: File Enc: 1 site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10, 2006. 1 architectural plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised February 13, 2006 Attachments • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 SOUryolo Southold, NY 11971 �oloQf OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G Q 54375 State Route 25 • OIyCOO (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) ^��O N�`' Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 23, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD East Marion Fire District Walter Gaipa, Secretary & Treasurer P.O. Box 131 East Marion, New York 11939 RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Gaipa: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan and site plan use diagram last revised March 10, 2006 and one (1) architectural plan last revised February 13, 2006, both prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects. This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/ restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house with 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MEI Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCIM # 1000-38.-7-7.1. The enclosed revised site plan and application is being referred to you again for fire access review and for your recommendations as the enclosed plan has undergone revisions. Thank you for your cooperation. Veryt yyours, Amy o Senior Planner CC: File Enc: 1 site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10, 2006. 1 architectural plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised February 13, 2006 Attachments PLANNING BOARD MEMBEV JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND March 23, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County Planning Commission Mr. Andrew P. Freleng, AICP, Chief Planner H.Lee Dennison bldg., 4`h Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Hghway Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Re: Planning Commission Comments on the Site Plan for Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCIM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 Zoning District: MII District Dear Mr. Freeleng, Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan is being referred to you for comments. Attached is the site plan, EAF, site plan application, architectural plan, site plan use diagrarn, architectural elevation drawing, informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects and the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Dunn Engineering last revised on February 2006. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m Respectfully yours, Amy Ford Senior Planner Cc: File Enc: 1 site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10, 2006. 1 architectural plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised February 13, 2006 Attachments • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 qf souryolo Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G 54375 State Route 25 • (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Ap�O D�yCOU'� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County Planning Commission Mr. Andrew P. Freleng, AICP, Chief Planner H.Lee Dennison bldg., 4`h Floor 100 Veterans Memorial Hghway Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Re: Planning Commission Comments on the Site Plan for Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCIM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 Zoning District: MII District Dear Mr. Freeleng, Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan is being referred to you for comments. Attached is the site plan, EAF, site plan application, architectural plan, site plan use diagrarn, architectural elevation drawing, informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects and the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Dunn Engineering last revised on February 2006. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m Respectfully yours, Amy Ford Senior Planner Cc: File Enc: 1 site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10, 2006. 1 architectural plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised February 13, 2006 Attachments PLANNING BOARD MEMBEP JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND March 23, 2006 Mr. Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment information for the above-mentioned site plan to your office for review. Enclosed are: • One (1) site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10, 2006. • One (1) architectural plan prepared by Butt, Otniba-O'Connor Architects last revised February 13, 2006. • Environmental Assessment Form • Site Plan Application • Site Plan Use Diagram • Architectural Elevation Drawing • Informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects • Traffic Impact Study prepared by Dunn Engineering last revised on February 2006 • Environmental Site Assessment Report prepared byLongshore Environmental Inc. dated June 22, 2005. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Amy Ford Senior Planner Cc: File Enc. • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 SOl�%yO/ Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G Q '� 54375 State Route 25 • �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) lycoulm Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment information for the above-mentioned site plan to your office for review. Enclosed are: • One (1) site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10, 2006. • One (1) architectural plan prepared by Butt, Otniba-O'Connor Architects last revised February 13, 2006. • Environmental Assessment Form • Site Plan Application • Site Plan Use Diagram • Architectural Elevation Drawing • Informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects • Traffic Impact Study prepared by Dunn Engineering last revised on February 2006 • Environmental Site Assessment Report prepared byLongshore Environmental Inc. dated June 22, 2005. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Amy Ford Senior Planner Cc: File Enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE MEMORANDUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Mark Terry, Local Water Revitalization Program Coordinator From Amy Ford, SeniorPlanner—�* Date: March 23, 2006 RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 In reference to the above, a copy of the proposed site plan maybe obtained in this office. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for consistency under the LWRP. This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/ restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the train spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house with 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCIM # 1000-38.-7-7.1. In addition, enclosed are the EAF, site plan application, site plan use diagram, architectural elevation drawing, LWRP application and informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects. Thank you in advance. Cc: File Enc: Attachments MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Of sooryolo Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex w ac 54375 State Route 25 G,Q • �O OI�C�(f (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE MEMORANDUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Mark Terry, Local Water Revitalization Program Coordinator From Amy Ford, SeniorPlanner—�* Date: March 23, 2006 RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM # : 1000-38-7-7.1 In reference to the above, a copy of the proposed site plan maybe obtained in this office. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for consistency under the LWRP. This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/ restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the train spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house with 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCIM # 1000-38.-7-7.1. In addition, enclosed are the EAF, site plan application, site plan use diagram, architectural elevation drawing, LWRP application and informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects. Thank you in advance. Cc: File Enc: Attachments PLANNING BOARD MEMBEY JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jaynes Richter, Town Engineer From Amy Ford, Senior Planner4 Date: March 23, 2006 RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SLIM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan and architectural plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house with 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MEI Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCIM # 1000-38.-7-7.1. In addition, enclosed are the EAF, site plan application, architectural plan, site plan use diagram, architectural elevation drawing, LWRI' application and informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects. The site plan enclosed is for your review and records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: File Enc: 1 site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10, 2006. "1 architectural plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised February 13, 2006 Attachments MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 QF Snuryolo Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G Q ',� 54375 State Route 25 • �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) COMM Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector Jaynes Richter, Town Engineer From Amy Ford, Senior Planner4 Date: March 23, 2006 RE: Oki -Do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SLIM # : 1000-38.-7-7.1 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan and architectural plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. This proposed site plan is for a Holistic Center as follows; new transient hotel/restaurant with 114 transient motel rooms: 87 rooms in 23 guest lodges in fourteen 3 unit and nine 5 unit clusters, and the remaining 27 guest rooms in the main spa building, totaling 80,000 sq. ft., including a 185 seat organic restaurant in the main spa building (103 guest seats, 72 public seats and 10 bar seats), plus office and accessory uses including 27 personal service treatment suites; a 3,834 sq. ft. private restaurant annex with 50 seats; a managers residence with 1,987 sq. ft. plus 687 sq. ft. deck, a pool house with 1,373 sq. ft., a maintenance and utility building with 7,205 sq. ft.; a covered 758 sq. ft. deck; a pool and 16 boat slip private marina; and 1,160 sq. ft. for three (3) gazebos on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MEI Zone located approximately 3,278 ft. south of New York State Road 25 at the south east end of Shipyard Lane known as 2835 Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCIM # 1000-38.-7-7.1. In addition, enclosed are the EAF, site plan application, architectural plan, site plan use diagram, architectural elevation drawing, LWRI' application and informational letter from Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects. The site plan enclosed is for your review and records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: File Enc: 1 site plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised March 10, 2006. "1 architectural plan prepared by Butt, Otruba-O'Connor Architects last revised February 13, 2006 Attachments V1- PATRICIA L PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 ., "Niarch 16,? BY HAND Ms. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and �Afl 1 7 2006 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road soathold t°"" ` P.O.Box 1179 Plannin e°a d Southold, NY 11971 _, Re: GAIA HoliNti,&erF e 2835 S tpi� yard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-07-7.1 Dear Ms. Woodhouse and the Board: As per your request, enclosed please find the following for the above referenced matter: 1. Three copies of the site plan 2. Three color elevation drawings 3. Three copies of the floor plans 4. Three copies of the traffic study If you have any questions, or need anything else, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you. Very truly yours, tricia C. Moore PCM/mr Encls. s� PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Marg�t�v� March 14, 2006 Ms. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and MAR 1 5 2006 Southold Town Planning Board i W 53095 Main Road r f P.O.Box 1179 1' so tcd Town Southold, NY 11971 pi+nen Boardl ' Re: Site plan of GAIA Holistic CdokJ,-J)o-Ltd SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 t Dear Ms. Woodhouse: In accordance with Bruno's request enclosed is an updated application form. Also enclosed is a copy of the ZBA application with exhibits for your file (for information only). The Zoning Board asked that we submit an application to the Trustees in order to better coordinate wetland issues. An application to the Trustees has also been filed. Enclosed five prints of the updated site plan which includes the matters within the Trustees's jurisdiction and the marine structures. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. P ours, . Moore cc: Butt Otruba-O'Connor, Architects 0 0 BUTPOTRUBA-O'CONNOR ARCHITECTS, AIA 1062 Northern Boulevard, Roslyn, NY 11576 Tel. (516) 625-6625 Fac. (516) 625-6629 Danita Otruba-O'Connor Edward P. Butt 1 of 1 Uses - Separate site plan - color code uses 1st Principal Use: Transient motel ( min. 3 acres required) - Total number of units is 114: 27 in motel building and 87 detached clusters ( clusters of 3 units and 5 units) (456,000 square feet) Special Permit required 100-121(B)(3) Transient Motel Accessory Uses: a. Restaurant in annex center (50 seats) b. office area (dedicated for motel use) c. Accessory "personal services" (27 rooms) d. Swimming pool (pool house) e. Maintenance & utility building 2nd Principal Use: Restaurant — Special Permit 100-121 (B)(1) 80,000 square feet require 72 seats for public, 126 for transient motel only Accessory- Gift shop & 2 offices 3rd Use: Private marina 100-121 (2A) / 80,000 square feet (permitted use) 1. Private Boat slips for restaurant and transient motel guests (not for rent) 2. basin is 60,380 square feet under water + 19,618 upland 3. Office for marina 4th Use: Single family residence for owner— 80,000 square feet (permitted use) FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 5, 2004 RENEWED & AMENDED: October 26, 2005 AMENDED: February 3, 2006 AMENDED: February 26, 2006 TO: Patricia Moore A/C Oki -Do Ltd. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated March 17, 2004 For permit for construction of transient motel a single family dwelling, two restaurants and a private marina at Location of property: 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 38 Block 7 Lot 7.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this conforming 800,624 square foot lot in the M -II District is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4, B., "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, riprap, or similar structure exists and which are adiacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead." Following the proposed construction the proposed project will have a 48 -foot setback to the existing bulkhead. In addition the proposed transient motel use and proposed restaurant uses require special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to Section 100-121 In addition, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII, Section 100- 122, which states, "No building shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the MII District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Pursuant to bulk schedule, all principal structures are limited to 35 feet in height. The architectural features, listed on the most recent site plan as "arcs," measure 35.83 feet, 55 feet, and 43 feet, at their highest points, respectively. LI Site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board will also be required. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (10/26/5) following changes in the scope of the project. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (2/3/6) following changes in the scope of the project. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (2/26/6) following additional information submitted to the building department in reference to this application. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA, Planning pff ww6 "T1 ab GROUND FLR PLAN �s 2. 33r Vii, 0 Y,I1 - -. - -I I r 5-Z 16 i t J <-Mis-sa:3s € �Y:iEnSd Nil ag gg �y£�i �iiE4�8 � 1 `�IpIDW d�gA� P; A45 senna sr+earDOM OY,ex PF.6i6RYlf vlwat�.ro O1RYGB1f lM6 CMEIWI [FJiW b! %dM Op6lbY.115 I.: 0 0 0 N. O 0 Mr. James Grathwohl 25325 Main Road Cutchogue NY 11935 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 0 March 9, 2006 RE: OLD OYSTER FACTORY 2835 SHIPYARD LANE, EAST MARION SCTM: 1000-38-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Grathwohl: We have a project we are planning for the Old Oyster Factory property in East Marion. The project involves the demolition of some old dilapidated buildings on the property that are on the SPLIA list. In accordance with Town of Southold's procedures we are notifying you of this project. If you need additional information or require further details of the project, please contact the office. Very truly yours, `Patricia C. Moore PCM/bp LI PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 E March 14, 2006 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Oki -Do ltd. 1000-39-7-7.1 Dear Chairman and Board members: At your request we prepared the Southold Trustees application in order to coordinate the recommendations of Trustees early into the project. However, the Trustees application required adding more detail with respect to the Marine structures and making revisions to the site plan. For your convenience attached to this letter is a list of activities which are within the Trustees's jurisdiction and will be reviewed by them. Greater engineering detail of the bulkhead, Stone Revetment and dredging was required on the site plan. We are providing you with the most recent site plan which incorporates all the wetland issues. Please replace the previously submitted site plan with the enclosed seven prints of the site plan last dated 3-10-06 which includes the bulkhead, revetment, and dredging information. The structures reviewed by the building department have not changed. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Very tru yours, tricia C. Moore cc: Butt Otruba-O'Connor, Architects • GAIA project • 1. Demolition of existing buildings within 100 feet of deteriorated bulkhead 2. Replacement of bulkhead with Stone Revetment (DEC recommendation) design to match adjacent Cleaves Point Condo 3. Construction of Motel and Restaurant within disturbed area (67.42 of property line/existing bulkhead) Existing Building within 54.9 feet of property line/bulkhead 4. Restaurant Annex and units within 100 feet of wetlands adjacent to Boat Basin 5. Repair/replace existing steel bulkhead in Boat Basin, as required with timber or vinyl bulkhead 6. Vegetation along adjacent area landward to Revetment to be planted 7. Maintenance Dredging of Boat Basin (2,500 c.y.) 8. Creation of man made water feature 9. Underground Drainage structures 10. Parking area within 100 feet of Bay 11. Removing sanitary system, garbage (deteriorated vessels) and cement debris adjacent to bulkhead 12. Normal construction activity associated with redevelopment of site within 100 feet of wetland All activity in accordance with approved site plan. -RrtOJCC—i btSt.A)F—ktb►J FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 5, 2004 RENEWED & AMENDED: October 26, 2005 AMENDED: February 3, 2006 AMENDED: February 26, 2006 TO: Patricia Moore A/C Oki -Do Ltd. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated March 17, 2004 For permit for construction of transient motel, a single family dwelling two restaurants and a private marina at Location of property: 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 38 Block 7 Lot 7.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this conforming 800,624 square foot lot in the M -II District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4, B "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead concrete wall riprap or similar structure exists and which are adjacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead." Following the proposed construction the proposed project will have a 48 -foot setback to the existing bulkhead. In addition the imposed transient motel use and proposed restaurant uses require special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to Section 100-121 In addition, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXII Section 100 - Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference with the same force and effect if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Pursuant to bulk schedule, all principal structures are limited to 35 feet in height. The architectural features listed on the most recent site plan as "arcs," measure 35.83 feet 55 feet and 43 feet, at their highest points, respectively. i • Site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board will also be required. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (10/26/5) following changes in the scope of the project. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (2/3/6) following changes in the scope of the project. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (2/26/6) following additional information submitted to the building department in reference to this application. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA, Planning APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS For Fee: $ Filed By: Office Notes rice Use Only Date Assigned/Assignment No. 2835 Shipyard Lane East Marion Parcel Location: House No. Street Hamlet 38 7 7.1 800,624 sq.ft SCTM 1000 Section Block_Lot(s) Lot Size Zone District M11 I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: October 26 2005 �,&,,ramcaded Applicant/Owner(s): Dr. Kasuko Tatsumura Hillyer Mailing 1 Lincoln Plaza, NY, NY 10023 Telephone: 212-799-9711 NOTE: If applicant is not the owner, slate if applicant Is oe,ner's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. Authorized Representative: Patricia C. Moore Esq. Address: 51020 Main Road 765-4330 Southold NY 11971 765-4643 Please specify who you wish correspondence ti) be mailed to, from the above listed names: ❑ Applicant/Owner(s) CTAuthorized Representative ❑ Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED March 17, 2004 FOR: 6 Buiiding Permit. 0 Certificate of Occupancy ❑ Pre -Certificate of Occupancy 0 Change of Use ❑ Permit for As-BuiltConstruction 6 Special Exception Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed, Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph Of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Setback to bulkhead Article11 XXIII Section 100- 239'4 Subsection B in Boat Basin �iND iiF-'.qhY of Ar"ch,s -civrn.t rec..,ic,reS . etd 35' 0170 j a Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: CSA Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning 1VIap. ❑ A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law -Section 280-A. ❑ Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section ❑ Reversal or Other A prior appeal Xhas ❑ has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. _Year . �eeie-1 &",,tier ) Reason for Appeal Continued Zoning Board of Appeals re: Oki -Do Ltd. Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3 the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals is to analyze and assess the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the health, safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or community. In performing this balancing test, the Zoning Board is charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors enumerated in Town Law Section 267b -3(b). The variance should be granted for the following reasons: 1. No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance is granted. The 18.7 acres is presently developed with dilapidated Industrial buildings which exceed 35 feet in height. The dilapidated industrial buildings were formerly used as an Oyster Processing Factory. The Boat Basin is man made and the buildings are located at less than 75 feet from the bulkhead. The setbacks of the building to the Boat Basin will be maintained at 48 feet. The setback of the existing building to the bulkhead along the Bay is presently 54.9 feet (the proposed distance is 67.42 feet- more conforming). The DEC has recommended stone revetment along the Bay to match the design of the revetment at the Cleaves Point Condominiums. The location of the revetment is expected to be at the same location as the bulkhead, the final location will be determined by the DEC. The Motel and Restaurant building is a unique design which incorporates the circles of the holistic and Feng Shui belief (Ancient Asian culture and philosophy). The walls are "spires" which taper towards the ski and follow the feng shui circles. The spires are critical components of the architectural design and carry throughout the building as well as the overall development of the entire site. The Zoning Ordinance at 100-230 (D) (1) Specifically provides Height Exceptions for: "spires, belfries, cupolas and domes not for human occupancy..." Spires is not defined in the zoning ordinance. However,"Spires" from New World Dictionary, Second Collage Edition is defined as "the top part of a pointed, tapering object or structure, as a mountain peak or anything that tapers to a point, as a pointed structure capping a tower or steeple. The architectural feature is a spire. The walls bisect the building at three points: The first arc (length is 304.5 feet) begins at 28 feet and tapers to 55 feet (average height of the wall is 41.5 feet); the second arc (length 100'9") begins at 33.5 feet and tapers to 43 feet and the third arc (length 1011711) begins at 29.5 feet) and tapers to 35110" These spires are a critical design element to the building. While These arcs fit the definition of "spires" and would not require height variances, if the Board feels that a variance is necessary then the applicant respectfully request an area variance for the height of the arcs. The arcs will not be out of character with the property, the existing industrial buildings exceed 35 feet in height and the property contains an exhaust tower from the Oyster Factory which also exceeds 35 feet. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant can not be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The location of the Restaurant and decking is maintained to keep the setbacks away from Shipyard Lane and provide significant setbacks for parking and landscaping. Most importantly to the owner is the location of the buildings to benefit from their location along the water. The established setbacks are maintained, the property is heavily developed with industrial strength poured concrete. The owner, in their plan for redevelopment will remove these "hard structures" and incorporate natural materials and colors. The Feng Shui design of the overall property can only be achieved by developing the structures within the circles. The arcs are used as symbols (as a cupola on a church identifies the structure) for the Feng Shui design. 3. The area variance is not substantial The setbacks were established by the existing development of the Oyster Factory. The Boat Basin is man made and used by the Oyster Factory for their fish processing operation. The proposed buildings will rehabilitate a deteriorated eyesore. The existing industrial buildings on the site exceed 35 feet. The architectural design is very carefully considered to capture the importance of the sky and water at this site. This building will attract visitors from around the world and the owner hopes will be considered among the architectural wonders of this century. The application of the balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance. 4. The variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed structures are maintaining existing setbacks and areas of disturbance. The foundations and bulkheads within the basin area are thick poured cement, these structures will be reconstructed, to the extent required, to comply with both DEC and Trustees recommendations. All development will be in compliance with environmental regulations and LEED certification. The setbacks to the wetlands along the north-east area of the property are preserved in a natural condition. The area adjacent to the Bay contains cement, bulkhead, dilapidated boats and construction material from the prior fish processing plant. The proposed plan will clean up the area, remove environmentally hazardous materials, all in compliance with DEC regulations. Moreover, great emphasis is placed on landscaping and visual treatment. The design of the building, we hope, will be of international importance. The design will be spectacular from every angle, but most unique from the waterfront. 5. The alleged difficulty was not self-created. The area of development was established by the Oyster Factory. Significant disturbance was caused by the Industrial use, the proposed redevelopment of the site will return the property to a more natural condition. The architects designed with the zoning code which allows spires. The arcs bisect the building. Removal of this feature destroys the architectural integrity of the building. Two separate Architectural Review Committees have reviewed the preliminary designs and approved of it. 0 a 6. The variance requested is the minimum variance practicable given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant. The proposed development will be a benefit to the community and a complete revitalization of an industrial site. We respectfully request that the appeal be granted, together with any further relief that is deemed necessary and reasonable. signature State of New York County of Suffolk Swopn--,to this 3'„ 9 )ss Y Mt . 2DO(Q . BETSY A. PERKINS No" Stele of New Yon No. 01PE 9130036 Cualifine in Suffolk county C,neolssion Expires July 18-2-005 02/17/06 11:31 FAX 516 625 9 BUTT OTRUBA 0 CONNOR • U. ooc .- PPLICAlsir'S PR0JYC1 IDF'SCRI 1'IO1N' (FCK ZBA RefaYmte; Applicant:QV , - CSO ) "tL Date Prepared:________ --- 1. hor Demolition of LZ Asting Building Areas Please describe areas being removed: _metal building128 565 SF) and (3) 1 -story metal building (2,449 SF). In addition to the buildings, there are venous ........«..,...... .e,.,..,p.f The°a amMh.w° fnr mmnvai include a concrete block oumo house, remnants of a cesspool field, hoist, boat docks, movame conveyor, sneos, cnanney anu uvenreau pipv-. - 11. New Construction Arens (Yew Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions)! Dimensions of first floor extension: New First Floor: 28,992 SF _— Dimensions of new second floor: New Second Floor 22 430 SF _ Dimensions of floor above second 1eVeL- New l)nenelosed Rooftop Patio: 5,400 SF Height (from 5nished ground to top of ridge): 42.0'to the top of S li ht. Avg height of Arc Walls: Arcl-41.5', Arc2-38.25' L: basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes, please provide height (above ground) and Arc3.32.67' measured from natural existing grade to first floor. N/A _ Ili. Proposed Alterations or Interior Structural Changes without entargementleltensiou (attacl: moa sheat frncces3ary) - Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BFFORB Alterations: N/A Number of Floors and Changes WM-1 Alterations: N/A Y W. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage (from surveyor): , Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 36,730 SF Proposed increase of building coverage: -0.4% 33 475 SF -36 730 S / 754 677 S Square footage of your lot: 754 677.0 SF (17.325 acres) Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area: Lot Coverage of Transient Motel l)nly: 4w4°h Total for All Buildings: 13.5% (=101,552 SF / 754,677 S V. Purpose of New Construction Requested: Redevelopment of she. _ VL Please describe the sand contours (flat, slope %, etc.) as exist and how It rotates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): WA Please submit seven (7) photos, labeled to show all yard areas of proposed construction after staking corners for ueiv construction), or photos of existing building area to be altered (area of requested changes). '!7.002; 2/2004; 1/2006 0 0 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? O Yes X No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? %Yes ONO I[emcn ,J 0- _ dzbvis fir getVCkns C. I) Are there any areas that contain wetland grasses? _ Y2S J 2) Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with thts application?3) Is the property bulkheaded between the wetlands area and the upland building area? �t?S _ 4) If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? es Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: c ! D. 5'1arv2 IZwc=l me -- Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? _ 11e.a. r -- E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? NO (Please show area of these structures on a diagram if any exist. Or state "none" on the above line, if applicable.) F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? tvo If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department and describe: G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? ya_:s - If yes, please label the proximity of your lands on your map with this application. Vn't ,� Cleaver ??0%r4 Condo. DuJrLOOV W4 H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel-AWMaonO 5iU --l�te}nr- and proposed use 'T/cvn5 ie> t (Yl n+�l d o (examples; ex' in single-family, proposed: same with garage.) `"�"'~�5 �� Authorized Signature and Date 2/05 • APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSUREfRM The Town of Southolci's Codc of Ethics Prohibits conflicts of interest on the girt of Town officers and employees The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same YOUR NAME: � B i wq 1 " r Ll ')1 & g 9 E- .flG (Last name, first name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person or company name.) F KA60Kv T�rSvmu� NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) 44, LLy t Q_ Tax Grievance Variance Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other If "Other", name the activity: Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee own shares. s more than 5% of the YES NO If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this..__ d' y of Signature:" Print Nsame = �i j /Zyc 1 q ByJdn/tf SUB. LOT C"750 ILDFNG ays-rcr 7�Lgrtt WO IL Co 7 G 11 i -... -... e_x AAOL JI�NR STREET gJ C/fLLAGE DI'. n A6 m A6 m D ivl'FR OWNERC7i{5�ec'�ctfrn5 N fl., E . Af �r€ s 4rA4 CON' I 7 67, ~ p S. SEASU VL. FARM COMM CCB. MISC. Mkt. Value SUB. LOT C"750 ILDFNG ays-rcr 7�Lgrtt 1 � 1 -1 a o W IL Co 7 G 11 i -... -... e_x AAOL `W'Gzy, _ �S yo n A6 m A6 m D AT9/27/? 7 ✓ .S 1 '3! 2 73 'r 9 i mow, 1% kwon `O � 4rA4 CON' I 7 _ c n ~ p ARM Acre 9qozValue Per Value vo n I0 e -y, `i (able Am 3o& (6) 4 J D' ( 30 IN, 3 )odland l03 - I C r�`la rs: i ampland v FRONTAGE ON W TER ' ishland FRONTAGE ON ROAD use Plat DEPTH I r BULKHEAD 3 all .1 ( DOCK7 _ 4- od�f �4,c, q5'bq(,, f -d - ��- OWNER STR ET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT c �l% �✓ �,yy X �3 . d FORMER OWNER ACREAGE .f. Wi TYPE OF BUILDING � ES. SEAS. VL. CB. I MISC: LAND IMP. TOTAL "ARND. Aj . �`-t� ...:-Y... . _ o :F� -Yt bj ; o o s,/24 -i r L NSW ABOVE ' J r %' Value 1011-IFY- 7 -s' TOWN WNER STREET VILLAGE DIST.1 SUB. LOT DRMEA OWNER �N[/ E. — V0SP Awl,r 7 %pbaat ACR.r 3 S W Ica VA LQ Yt C'.. TYPE OF BUILDING S. SEAS. VL: �rM COMM MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTALDATE REMARKS AGE NORMAL BUILDING CONDITION BELOW ABOVE SRM Acre Value Per Acre Value able FRONTAGE ON WATER odland FRONTAGE ON ROAD L1. adowlamd DEPTH r' ase Plot BULKHEAD o I DOCK 0 0 Re: GAIA Holistic Circle / OKI -do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Dear President and Board: Enclosed is the wetland permit application for the above referenced project. This plan has been submitted to the ZBA, Planning Board and Health Department. The DEC application will be submitted shortly, we had apre-submission conference wth the DEC in order to obtain their comments. We have incorporated their initial recommendations into this plan. Enclosed is my office check in the amount of $250.00. . Due to the complexity of this project we recommend that we schedule a separate site inspection with the architects and myself to carefully review the project description while on site. We will make ourselves available at your convenience. Very'truly__yours, C `A r !� Patricia C. Moore cc: Werthner m,.:., ;:` _....a,._...__ ' MAR 1 5 2006 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Maid Road Southold, New york 11971 Tei: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 14, 2006 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Southold Town Trustees P.O.Box 1179 Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 Re: GAIA Holistic Circle / OKI -do Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Dear President and Board: Enclosed is the wetland permit application for the above referenced project. This plan has been submitted to the ZBA, Planning Board and Health Department. The DEC application will be submitted shortly, we had apre-submission conference wth the DEC in order to obtain their comments. We have incorporated their initial recommendations into this plan. Enclosed is my office check in the amount of $250.00. . Due to the complexity of this project we recommend that we schedule a separate site inspection with the architects and myself to carefully review the project description while on site. We will make ourselves available at your convenience. Very'truly__yours, C `A r !� Patricia C. Moore cc: Werthner m,.:., ;:` _....a,._...__ ' MAR 1 5 2006 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only _Coastal Erosion Permit Application _Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit _AmendmenUTrans fer/Extension _Received Application: _Received Fee:$ _Completed Application _Incomplete _SEQRA Classification: Type IType IIUnlisted_ _Coordination:(date sent) _CAC Referral Sent: _Date of Inspection: _Receipt of CAC Report: _Lead Agency Determination: _Technical Review: _Public Hearing Held: Resolution: n L J Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-i-486%01 Name of A/pplica/nt , }� 5 r C1 Address_ / L 11L' 0,61 i- 6 z d y l y-. /o (-j,;,-)) Phone Number:( Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- 3 Property Location: SS _5 fr��/ Ue� ) J1 (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: (If applicable) Address: iqc-Cl � Phone: - %i 5 {Q Albert SpFFQ(,� J. Krupski, President James King, Vice -President Artie Foster o '� Ken Poliwoda H Peggy A. Dickerson y BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only _Coastal Erosion Permit Application _Wetland Permit Application Administrative Permit _AmendmenUTrans fer/Extension _Received Application: _Received Fee:$ _Completed Application _Incomplete _SEQRA Classification: Type IType IIUnlisted_ _Coordination:(date sent) _CAC Referral Sent: _Date of Inspection: _Receipt of CAC Report: _Lead Agency Determination: _Technical Review: _Public Hearing Held: Resolution: n L J Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-i-486%01 Name of A/pplica/nt , }� 5 r C1 Address_ / L 11L' 0,61 i- 6 z d y l y-. /o (-j,;,-)) Phone Number:( Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000- 3 Property Location: SS _5 fr��/ Ue� ) J1 (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: (If applicable) Address: iqc-Cl � Phone: - %i 5 {Q 0oard of Trustees Applicat• GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): ty fy Area Zoning: Previous use of property: r�(D Q Intended use of property: / 4/2 % Mo r—L k ! S TA l� a /17 - Prior y Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date ' No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? ✓No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): k t 00ard of Trustees Applicato WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: �� [ n L b' `'L h�1'/y % C j % ('S % 11r6 13 a,1�-P✓✓'IGS %�� CSF_ Dt'✓�✓or-is//✓`� (-3✓2Fh' �%� l�✓.51�r'13A✓TCF rci i3L l2CP✓-L ejlfit x_1-YycJsl✓r/;9L tt,/OW:`5 c F -P` ��IeE1J c -✓ii H i R/�Ns✓�✓7T r, TES � j'EsIF)v��rJn'TEx1,5Ti✓YG k3u ;?T u /9a i✓/ T-c,f C use p �4N 1)/s 7 Ll % 13L�: �ScC S✓rL /�Gi��/� Area of wetlands on lot: L{3: S l Q square feet Percent coverage of lot: L? ,S Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: j �!; !i feet O S Z LS ✓ j L-" r 1_ r9/y /=G "<' 4L L .S Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge ofwetlands: G y, q q,, feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No !✓ Yes f G �c < ✓9I -I t) Sc -t9 PL T1,' 1✓ 19T%nt/Y7 4. PE/y7c+G-f9L e'F F&c'✓- )))J97 e I194Co/6rt' ;' s/�(FS ��✓ 2i If yes, how much material will be excavated?cubic yards How much material will be filled? cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: o /o X Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: /`oatc l 1 au<% L rli ?�S3/�!/o/Y Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): S� r / i)i9�� L / /' !nt T- 2-.4. til 6 7 0 GAIA project LI 1. Demolition of existing buildings within 100 feet of deteriorated bulkhead 2. Replacement of bulkhead with Stone Revetment (DEC recommendation) design to match adjacent Cleaves Point Condo 3. Construction of Motel and Restaurant within disturbed area (67.42 of property line/existing bulkhead) Existing Building within 54.9 feet of property line/bulkhead 4. Restaurant Annex and units within 100 feet of wetlands adjacent to Boat Basin 5. Repair/replace existing steel bulkhead in Boat Basin, as required with timber or vinyl bulkhead 6. Vegetation along adjacent area landward to Revetment to be planted 7. Maintenance Dredging of Boat Basin (2,500 c.y.) 8. Creation of man made water feature 9. Underground Drainage structures 10. Parking area within 100 feet of Bay 11. Removing sanitary system, garbage (deteriorated vessels) and cement debris adjacent to bulkhead 12. Normal construction activity associated with redevelopment of site within 100 feet of wetland All activity in accordance with approved site plan. E'XA41 f 1. - PaOTL-CT i)L5C2r19r1aN �ard of Trustees Applicat County of Suffolk State of New York %r')oo BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS T APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. -' Signature r� SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1Y DAY OF (1 gr—ci4 20 O (,- (NotaKy Public MARGARET C. RUTKOWSKI Notary Public, State of New York No. 4982528 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires June 3, -12-0 O % 9 is APPLICANT/AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: 'fes / / T�y�1 C- I'y�()C', �� ✓� f/i( I"C Ij (Last name, first name, -middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) � _L� f"4 I�Ko 7-/4 F5oIngI? NAME OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) _ - I i1 Lc. y k- o Tax grievance Building Variance Trustee Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of plat Mooring Exemption from plat or official map Planning Other (If "Other', name the activity.) Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest -"Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO If you answered "YES", complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant/agent/representative) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non -corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); - - - - C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this J�dasof' p9 fj X Signature Print Name Form TS 1 �C • G i 'g. r,42 JUPJ�02 ir:0 "au_ AUTHORIZATION LETTER New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Suilding 40 -SUNY Stony Rrook, New York 11790-2356 Att- Regulatory Permits OWNER: OKI -DO LTD. - name: Dr. Razuko Tatsurnura Hill}'er Ph.D, address: President 1 Lincoln Plaza, Apt. 24E; New York, NY 10,023 telephone number;212-799-9711 PROPERTY: 2535 Shipyard La:r;e., East Marion SCTM##: 1000-38-07-7.1 AGENT: name: Patricia C. Moore Esq. address: 51020 Main Road, Sout1_-0l:-1 NY 11971 telephone number: 631-76S-1330 Dear Sir or Madam; I Dr. Kazuko Tatsumux'a Hi1lyer Ph.D authorize my C. attorney, Patricia C McorF as my agent submissions to the DEC, Southold Town. for all Trustees, other agency having jurisdiction regarding the and any property, Very truly yours Dri<.Gl,kc Tacsumura Hillyer Ph.D � � \ 10. � � \ wa • PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Betsey Perkins Secretary March 1, 2006 �x�i,•rr n,w+wa .,. Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals �? Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman Southold Town Hall r - 53095 Main RoadSAA 5 2006 Southold, NY 11971 Sc�thold sown Re: Oki -Do ltd. Plannin Board 1000-39-7-7.1 Dear Chairman and Board members: .p Since the last submission in 2005 the project has been revised to incorporate comments received by other agencies and Town Departments. In accordance with an updated Notice of Disapproval last amended February 26, 2006, the enclosed documents are submitted in support of our applications. Please replace the previous submission with the enclosed original and six copies of the following: 1. Application for Special Exception, January 10, 2006 letter from Butt-Otruba-O'Connor, Project Architects which further describes the project, Questionnaire, and Transactional Disclosure Form. 2. Application for variances, Transactional disclosure, Questionnaire, Project description, Long EAF also submitted to Planning Board, LWRP, and Site plan 3. A site plan application is before the Southold Town Planning Board Thank you for your anticipated cooperation, if you need any other information please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Ptrt icia C. Moore PCM/mr Encls. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION Application No. Date Filed: TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK: I (We) Oki -Do Ltd., Dr. Kasuko Tatsumara Hill,yfr 1 Lincoln Plaza, NY, NY (Residence, House No. and Street c/o Patricia C. Moore Esq. 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 (Hamlet, StatC Zip Code, Telephone Number) hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE 100 , SECTION 121 , SUBSECTION B (1) & (3) for the below -described property for the following uses and purpposes (and as shown on the attached plan drawn to Scale): Transient Motel, Restaurant(s)- main restaurant and annex within complex, with permitted uses of residence and marina Attached list of uses: 114 transient motel units with accessory a. restaurant in annex center (50 seats) b. office area c. personal services d. swimming pool with pool house e. maintenance & utility building Restaurant - 72 seats for public and 126 seats for motel with accessory gift shop & offices Project to contain extensive Ornamental gardens and landscaping A. Statement of Ownership and Interest. Kasuko Tatsumara Hillyer, president property known and referred to as 2835 Shipyar Ouse No., ^is(are) the owner(s) ast Marion Hamlet) of identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section , Block Lot(S) 7.1 which is not (is) on a subdivision Map (Filed "Map of " Filed Map o. and has been approved by the Southold Town Planning Board on T' as a [Minor] [Major] Subdivision). The above-described property was acquired by the owner on B. The applicant alleges that the approval of this exception would be in harmony with the intent and purpose of said zoning ordinance and that the proposed use conforms to the standards prescribed therefor in said ordinance and would not be detrimental to property or persons in the neighborhood for the following reasons: Redevelopment of property is beneficial to neighborhood and community. Delapidated Industrial use and buildings will be redeveloped with special exception and permitted uses. Emphasis of development will be gardens and tranquil setting. Complian with energy policies "LEED" green building certification. Goal of Owner is for a Unique facility with world-wide recognition. The property which is: the subject of this application is zoned MII i.s.consiatcnt with the use(s) described in the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith. is not consistent with the Certificate of Occupancy being furnished herewith for the following reason(s): IAT -N ]1 1 " iAr ?'tXk)9A is consistent with the zoning of the parcel and revitalization of COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) waterfront (Delapidated Industrial Buildings to be demolished and SS.: area of disturbance an rin s maintained to greatest extent STATE OF NEW, YORK) practical. ( i gna S or to before y his)' 1.00 day ofHalci, 19 / 1p 17 C eEWA PERMS / L NO1" Public. SW- d Nen ypN 2/y/86) No. 01 PE 6130636 1 O"alllled in SMA Courcy COMMISSM Expras July 18, 2- 03/13/06 11:10 FAX 616 625 6629 Btrr OTRUBA O'COYNOR IM002/003 • • S 1= lj BUTT•OTRUBA-O'CONNOR ARCHITECTS, AL4 1062 Northern Boulevard. Roslyn, NY 11576 Tel. (516) 625-6625 Fax (516) 625-6629 08 March 2006 Town. of Southold Southold Town Hall Annex PO Box 1179 54375 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Gaia Holistic Circle Dear Mr. Semon: _ As per your request, the following is a list of submissionsto o er ageaeies that• W04 ic-411 be making and the approximate, expected dates for these "su5mfssfons: Agency • Southold Planning (Includes Southold.LN'i'RP) • Southold ARC • Southold Fire Departn;ent • Suffolk County Health Department (Inc. Suffolk County Waste Water Mgt.) • Southold ZBA Expected Submission Dates Submitted 2005 Submitted Dec. 2005 Reviewed with recommendations in 2005 Submitted February 2006 Week of March 61, 2006 • New York State DEC/Arrnv Corp of Engineers Week of March 20th, 2006 Includes notice of intent to DEC with Storm Water Pollution Control Plan. Application to DOS thm Army Corp of Engineers June 2006. • Southold Board of Trustees Week of March 13th, 2006 • SPLIA Notice to Landmark Preservation Committee Week of March 13th, 2006 03"15"Uc 1.1:11 FAS. 516 625 6625 BUTT OTRUBA O'CONNOR Z003/003 • 9 New York State DOT Final submittal after Planning Bd. approval. Recommendations made in traffic study. • Southold Building Uepzutment • LE_=D Final submittal after Planning Bd. approval. Listed on Register in 2005 -ongoing Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Danita Otruba-O'Connor Principat OJ/13/06 7.1.:09 1'AS 516 625 6629 • BITP CTRLBA O'CON'40R 0 Butt•Otruba-O'ConnorArchitects, AIA i 062.'Voehera &ulevard R4r„ Neu, 1 ork 11576 TeL (".`16)625.6615 Rn. (51 K) 625.6629 Fax Cover Sheet DATE: 3/13/06 TIME: 11:00am TO: Bmno Semon COMPANY: Town of Soulo!d CC: Pat Moore / 631=763-4643 FAX NO.: 631-765.3136 FROM: Danita Dtvba-O'Connor SUBJECT: TOTAL PAGES: 3 (INCLUDING THIS PAGE PI2,.n:.si Plnue W2 `?6.62%66251fymi do not mdi ,d pggu h tbu hwrannrreon 2001/003 a•. �11 1 11 FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 5, 2004 RENEWED & AMENDED: October 26, 2005 AMENDED: February 3, 2006 AMENDED: February 26, 2006 TO: Patricia Moore A/C Oki -Do Ltd. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated March 17 2004 For permit for construction of transient motel a single family dwelling two restaurants and a private marina at Location of property: 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 38 Block 7 Lot 7.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this conforming 800,624 square foot lot in the M -II District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 100-239.4, B., "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead concrete wall, riprap, or similar structure exists and which are adjacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead." Following the proposed construction the proposed project will have a 48 -foot setback to the existing bulkhead. In addition the proposed transient motel use and proposed restaurant uses require special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to Section 100-121. In addition. the proposed construction is not permitted_ pursuant to Article XXII, Section 100- 122 which states "No building shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the MII District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Pursuant to bulk schedule all principal structures are limited to 35 feet in height. The architectural features listed on the most recent site plan as "arcs," measure 35.83 feet, 55 feet, and 43 feet, at their highest points, respectively. Site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board will also be required. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (10/26/5) following changes in the scope of the project. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (2/3/6) following changes in the scope of the project. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (2/26/6) following additional information submitted to the building department in reference to this application. C Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA, Planning i �p,avan Iweu� U 7`� µSNI � 3S'-io a I �Icswer a£s� Z 1 r27 , GROUND FLR PLAN lid 't� SGIE: ,K•.1' -W 1 ce HSKr z „WWI � 3D4� it SSS+` O u �nSKt Z 20-0 ,A SEATM OFEAwOW 0 E1ELK leareuwreaee;ve�rs Qawnlertnmt uE,au eu,en en e.n Q eunee•m Lwm I.. 11 & tj a I • N 0 PATRICIiCC. MOORE, ATTORNEY AAW 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 TO WY1 (% SUBJECT DATE D✓<1 2� I FEB 1 7 2006 ✓moo. SIGNE�v Post -W Fax Note 7671 DatepageSO- TO From �Itk I Co. O hone # Phone # Fax # /. L ' 1 Z. Fax # TO: Patricia Moore A/C Oki -Do Ltd. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 4 d NO. 3 SOUTHOLD )EPARTMENT QLD, N.Y. HSAPPROVAL DATE: July 5, 2004 RENEWED & AMENDED: October 26, 2005 AMENDED: February 3, 2006 Please take notice that your application dated March 17, 2004 For permit for marina at Location of property: 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 38 Block 7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Im restaurants ti �-,� • , .art Y Lot 7.1 not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4, B., "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead, concrete wall, riprap, or similar structure exists and which are adiacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead." Following the proposed construction the proposed project will have a 48 -foot setback to the existing bulkhead. In addition the proposed transient motel use and proposed restaurant uses require special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to Section 100-121 Site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board will also be required. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (10/26/5) following changesr n�r 96c pe of the pr Iect. This Notice of Disapproval was amended (2/3/6) following changes in the scope of the p o. rized gnat Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA, Planning 11 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Damon Rallis, Building Department From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site PWiewer Date: February 3, 2006 Re: Gaia Holistic Circle: SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Enclosed for your review is the most recent site plan for the above project. Also enclosed is the Ground Floor Plan. Both maps revised as of 1/10/06. Encs. L MAILING ADDRESS: q svoryolo P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: 41 41 Town Hall Annex G Q '2 54375 State Route 25 • �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) � + IYMUM, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Damon Rallis, Building Department From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site PWiewer Date: February 3, 2006 Re: Gaia Holistic Circle: SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Enclosed for your review is the most recent site plan for the above project. Also enclosed is the Ground Floor Plan. Both maps revised as of 1/10/06. Encs. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND January 31, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold. NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: OKI -DO 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone M -II Dear Ms. Moore: This letter is to inform you that the above site plan application was reviewed at the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on January 12, 2006. A copy of the meeting minutes is enclosed. Please review the pertinent comments and inform us in writing if you are in agreement with the conditions. In addition, if required, please modify the site/construction plan, and submit the revisions to the Planning Board. If there are any questions, please contact us at 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 D.M. Respectfully yours, Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 OF soyo Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G C '� 54375 State Route 25 • �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) IyCOU Southold, NY Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: OKI -DO 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Zone M -II Dear Ms. Moore: This letter is to inform you that the above site plan application was reviewed at the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on January 12, 2006. A copy of the meeting minutes is enclosed. Please review the pertinent comments and inform us in writing if you are in agreement with the conditions. In addition, if required, please modify the site/construction plan, and submit the revisions to the Planning Board. If there are any questions, please contact us at 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 D.M. Respectfully yours, Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. 0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD REVISED ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 4:00 p.m., January 12, 2006 Town Hall Conference Room Present were: Councilman Thomas Wickham, Architects Glynis Berry and Ural Talgat, Acting Chairman Sanford Hanauer, members Herbert Ernest, Ronald McGreevy, Nicholas Planamento, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Bruno Semon, ARC Secretary Linda Randolph and project representatives. BCB Realty Holding Corp. SCTM# 1000-45-4-8.3 After a review of the map and signage, the Committee agreed to approve the project contingent upon reduction of the height and width of the main signage along the road. Ehrlich, Robert (Orient Gift Shop) SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 The Committee agreed to approve this project as submitted. Duck Walk Vineyard SCTM# 1000-75-2-2.1 Following review and discussion, the Committee agreed to approve the building design subject to light cuts and elevation, as well as an update on planting. Rich's Auto Body SCTM# 1000-102-3-1 The Committee agreed to approve the building subject to light cuts with the additional recommendations of corner landscaping & removal of the motel sign. OKI -DO, Ltd. (GAZA Holistic Circle) SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 A presentation was made by Architects Butt/Otruba-O'Connor. The Committee agreed to conceptually approve the project subject to receipt of additional drawings/information. Orient FD Telecom Project SCTM#1000-18-5-13.8 The Committee agreed to accept the presented materials with the following recommendation: a 6' retaining wall with berm to surround all four sides of the fenced area with a planting of 10-12' cedar trees. Councilman Wickham urged committee members to select a Chairperson. The Town Board will restructure all Town Committee terms for three years beginning with 2006. The meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Linda Randolph ARC Secretary • Ps Butt•Otruba-O'Connor Architects, AIA 1062 Northern Boulevard Roslyn, New York 11576 Tel. (516) 625.6625 Fax. (516) 625.6629 25 January 2006 Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Site Plan Review Application Gaia Holistic Center Shipyard Lane Town of Southold, New York Dear Mr. Semon Attached please find the Site Plan Review Application for the Gaia Holistic Center. The following is a list of drawings provided for your review: Civil Drawings - 9 sets C-1 Architectural Site Plan C -la Use Diagram (11x17 color sheet) — To EoU AZ)%A C-2 Zoning, Location Map and Building Data C-3 Existing Conditions (by Young and Young) C-4 Grading and Drainage Details (by Young and Young) C-5 Grading and Drainage Plan (by Young and Young) C-6 Landscape Plan (by Young and Young) Architectural Plans and Elevations — 9 sets Aa -1.1 Transient Motel Ground Floor Plan Aa -1.2 Transient Motel Second Floor Plan Aa -1.3 Transient Motel Roof Plan Aa -3.1 Transient Motel Exterior Elevations Ab -1.1 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Ground Floor Plan Ab -1.2 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Second Floor Plan Ab -1.3 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Roof Plan Ab -3.1 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Exterior Elevations 1/26/06 2 Ac -1.1 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Ground Floor Plan Ac -1.2 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Second Floor Plan Ac -1.3 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Roof Plan Ac -3.1 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Exterior Elevations Ad -1.1 Transient Motel Private Cafeteria Dining Hall (Private Restaurant) Annex Ground Floor Plan Ad -1.2 Transient Motel Private Cafeteria Dining Hall (Private Restaurant) Annex Roof Plan Ad -3.1 Transient Motel Private Cafeteria Dining Hall (Private Restaurant) Annex Exterior Elevations Af-1.1 Manager's Residence Ground Floor Plan Af-1.2 Manager's Residence Second Floor Plan Af-1.3 Manager's Residence Roof Plan Ag -1.1 Pool House Ground Floor Plan Ah -1.1 Maintenance/Utility Building Ground Floor Plan Items Previously Submitted: Environmental Site Assessment Report (by Longshore Environmental) — 2 copies Traffic Impact Study (by Dunn Engineering) — 2 copies Environmental Assessment Form — Long Version (by Cramer Consulting Group) — 2 copies If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me in the office. Respectfully Submitted, F4 ' Edward P. Butt Partner 1/26/06 2 BUTT • OTRUBA-O'CONNOR AECTS 1062 Northern Blvd. ROSLYN, NY 11576 LETTf i OF TRANSMITTAL w DAT) JOB lV . I �� 1 ,. (51X6)) 625-6625 A= TION To RE, 1-7, GA�f/i, AreWti WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached knder separate cover via the following items: > ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications' ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION S C_L__= Flp COPY TO SIGNED: H enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us a once. I n1C L AmL 1 mAiNawu I I to as CneCKea Deiow: ❑ For approval ❑ ❑ For your use ❑ ❑ As requested ❑ ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE Approved as submitted Approved as noted Returned for corrections C _a6Prev ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS S C_L__= Flp COPY TO SIGNED: H enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us a once. 01!23/ O6 14:17 PA\ 510 025 6629 BUTT OTRU:BA O'CONNOR 2001/003 Butt•Otruba-O'ConncrArcbite ;ts, AIA CJS 10621tioa ern Boaklawd Rost, n, New Yak 1 '576 Al Tei (516) 625.662: Fax (516) 62:.6629 Y°ax Cover Sheer DATE: TRAE: 2,13pm TO: E Mno Semon DE. C E V E 1; COMPANY: ' owu oFSouthold CC: ?at Moofe / 631-7655643 FAX NO.: 01-765-3136 FROM: Rdwazd P. Butt / D'aitiuL OnLba-O'Connor SUBJECT: Proposal TOTALPAGES: 3 (INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Here is a brief rmrati�e on some of die plus E 5pects of this 1 oject ]>asnta Phare roll516.625.6625 ifyu do xot r. kite allpga in l -I tmswurion of/23%06 14.18 ,'-:AK 51e 625 6629 Bi"1'1' 0TRUB9 O'CONNOR E &UTPOTRUBA-OVONNO R ARCHT TCTS, AI.A 1062 Northern Boulevard, Roslyn, NY, 1576 Tel (516) 62:' -6625 Far. (516) 61 i-6629 10 January 2006 Town of iouthold Southold Town Hall Annex PO Box :179 54375 St rte Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re:Gaia llolistic Circle Dear Mr. Semon: It is our pleasure to submit to you our applicatio r for the abo: a referenced project. I would like to to>e this opporturuty to tell you some adc itional infor ration about the project that would nct be indicated on the drawings at this time. 4002/003 As you are aware, the site is located on Gardinei s Bay in Ea: Marion. The 18.7 -acre site features a 1000 -foot shoreline along with an exiting dredger'. marina basin. Currently several abandoned and dilapidated structures ex st on the siU:. The overall site was used for cormnen,.iai purposes and much of the land dam aged. Our intention for the buildings and the site is to seek LEED ;;reen building certification. Upon co repletion, the proje,t will rank among t re most exce;rtional eco -friendly designs in the comi:rv. The project is currently registered with the US JBC under our firm. LEED certification provides a complete framework for assessing b>> ilding performance, site usage and mee iug sustainability foals. It not only ad, tresses ener¢:7 usage and efficiency but, restoration of the land and shoreline, sustainabl: site develo;: went, use of local materials and resource; in the project, recycling, pollutants, water savings. materials selection and indoor environ rental quality. Some of the items, which will be required and i nplemented :'or this project, are the following: r 6tlternative transportation: Two com mu er sltnttle va is will be provided for pickup of people coming to the site via public tray sportation. herefore parking capacity has been sized not to exceed the minimum 11cal zoning! :quirements. Some of the rainimurn will be land banked. • Bike storage racks se also provided to ncourage noa-invasive travel. e ll parking on the site will be by valet (nly. Once a .)erson arrives, they are encouraged not to use their car. • he parking areas themselves will be of permeable 1,, avel material which will allow the natural absorption of surface waters not add any runoff pollutants to the soil, r educe heat islands. il1:23'OG 14:'.5 F Y 5Uf 5Z: ti0i8 BU1'T OTRLBA O'CONNOR 2003/003 • Electric cans will be used on site for gett ng around, hit walking is preferred. • under developing the site, • The curren+ site was abused as an industrial site. We will be restoring the land by ac ding water features, creating lovely Jal anese gardens and adding landscaping. • '�N c will keep as many existing trees as possible and all new landscaping will be indigenous and wate:r efficient. • Tte shoreline and a large wetlands area 1; All be kept n itural and maintained. • T'ie existing bul dread along the bay will be replaced - vith a more natural stone rip - wrap to match the adjoining property. • T 3e new building will be constructed in he location c f the existing factory so as not tc disturb more of the site than is necessc ry. • A state of the art septic system called Kr maoglass wi be used. In essence it puts potable water back into the site. • The majority of materials used will be lo.al. • The materials and design style will blent with the sit:. Soft curves, natural colors. • All pathways inside the site will he natu: al materials. • Energy efficiency is addressed by means of solar hot vater and rooftop gardens. The e ttire energy usage for the site will be considered rer. nwable energy. • BcCcNCling will occw:. • Light pollution is kept to a minimum. L 1w level ligh :ing will be used along to paths a ad parking areas. • Water saving fixtures in the units. • Reduction of all cfc-based refrigerants i. implements l in the new Evac systems. Our directic is to provide a site in which the harm Dy of the bt :Ungs and the landscape reflects and 'estores a natural equilibrium. The elie at's objective is to reduce, recycle and return to the earth wha' is taken. Should you nave any questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Edward P. fluff Danita Otr. ba -O'Connor Principal Principal Butt•Otruba-O'Connor Architects, AIA 1062 Northern Boulevard Roslyn, New York 11576 Tel. (516) 625.6625 Fax. (516) 625.6629 12 January 2006 Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Site Plan Review Application Gaia Holistic Center Shipyard Lane Town of Southold, New York Dear Mr. Semon Attached please find the Site Plan Review Application for the Gaia Holistic Center. The following is a list of drawings provided for your review: Civil Drawings - 1 copies C-1 Architectural Site Plan C -la Use Diagram (11x17 color sheet) C-2 Zoning, Location Map and Building Data C-3 Existing Conditions (by Young and Young) C-4 Grading and Drainage Details (by Young and Young) C-5 Grading and Drainage Plan (by Young and Young) C-6 Landscape Plan (by Young and Young) Architectural Plans and Elevations —1 sets Aa -1.1 Transient Motel Ground Floor Plan Aa -1.2 Transient Motel Second Floor Plan Aa -1.3 Transient Motel Roof Plan Aa -3.1 Transient Motel Exterior Elevations Ab -1.1 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Ground Floor Plan Ab -1.2 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Second Floor Plan Ab -1.3 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Roof Plan Ab -3.1 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Exterior Elevations 1/12/06 1 1W & 0 Ac -1.1 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Ground Floor Plan Ac -1.2 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Second Floor Plan Ac -1.3 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Roof Plan Ac -3.1 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Exterior Elevations Ad -1.1 Transient Motel Private Cafeteria Dining Hall (Private Restaurant) Annex Ground Floor Plan Ad -1.2 Transient Motel Private Cafeteria Dining Hall (Private Restaurant) Annex Roof Plan Ad -3.1 Transient Motel Private Cafeteria Dining Hall (Private Restaurant) Annex Exterior Elevations Af-1.1 Manager's Residence Ground Floor Plan Af-1.2 Manager's Residence Second Floor Plan Af-1.3 Manager's Residence Roof Plan Ag -1.1 Pool House Ground Floor Plan Ah -1.1 Maintenance/Utility Building Ground Floor Plan Traffic Impact Study (by Dunn Engineering) — 2 copies If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me in the office. Respectfully Submitted, t44 Edward P. Butt Partner 1/12/06 1 Butt•Otruba-O'Connor Architects, AIA 1062 Northern Boulevard Roslyn, New York 11576 Tel. (516) 625.6625 Fax. (516) 625.6629 12 January 06 Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer ---- Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 P.O. Box 11792006 i Southold, New York 11971 J r J J Re: Site Plan Review Application Gaia Holistic Center Shipyard Lane Town of Southold, New York Dear Mr. Semon As per our phone conversation from last week, attached please find our updated submittal for the GALA Holistic Center. For your use, I have included a brief list of items remaining for coordination. 1. Finalize landscape coordination. 2. Indicate piping for the waterfall at the mountain. 3. Indicate piping for fountain at the entry gate. 4. Indicate Loading Docks 5. Location of Street Trees. Are the street trees typically located between the curb and property line or within the property? If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me in the office. Respectfully Submitted, v4F Edward P. Butt 1/12/06 1 BUTT • OTRUBA•O'CONNOR A19TECTS 1062 Northern Blvd. ROSLYN, NY 11576 (516) 625.6625 TO d (+ L4 �%� l 1 otj 1 506) WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached Under separate cover via V IV,/plViZ� the following items: ElShop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION .. f .l �7�A_ i.1 �Ii /.... .► ... 1 .. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ For your use ❑ �s requested ❑ ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FORBIDS DUE Approved as submitted Approved as noted Returned for corrections ❑ ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS ii0'V5 u �/MS J�YLC/H Sl'[� nWNS COPY TO C19PY ff%GH SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Eastern Long Island Office NAYLOR ENGINEERING, P.C. Three Long Pond Road, Lake Panamoka, N.Y. 11961-1828 tmhwx Lon81ilmd • (631) 929-2860 (fe) • (631) 919-2859 (Fax) • mfrs. mgbr�aservao January 11, 2006.. _ Butt Otruba-O'Connor 1062 Northern Blvd Roslyn, New York 11576 ATTN: Edward Butt, R.A. Project Manager Dear Ed: Re: Wastewater. Treatment Facilities Gaia Holistic Center Our Job No. 332-01 In response to your request for some generalized background with regard to the Cromaglass Treatment System, we provide the following information. In short, Cromoglass is the only treatment system approved for use in Suffolk County for flows less than 15,000 gallons per day (GPD). The system's effectiveness in reducing biological loadings from conventional domestic and commercial sewage exceeds 95 % . In essence, the impact on the environment for 20 homes on a Cromaglass system is equivalent to one single family home. The equipment proposed for the site is manufactured by the Cromaglass Corporation (www.cromaglass.com) and has been used extensively on Long Island since 1993. Passive Denitrification Systems were used for projects "above stipulated flow densities" and under 15,000 GPD up until the mid 1980's. Our firm refused to design such systems as, in this writer's belief, they were doomed to premature failure. Our primary objections to these systems are related to land use requirements and the fact that there remains no means to remove dead cell mass from the sand filter leading to premature failure. Experience over the years later showed that 348 out of 350 systems had failed or experienced significant problems and the systems were no longer accepted by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services / New York State Department of Environmental Conservation after 1988. As a result of the preceding, back in the mid eighties, we investigated various wastewater treatment methods suitable for small scale facilities. After weeding out those alternatives that we felt hadn't adequately proved themselves, we narrowed it down to three (3) final candidates. Those three wastewater systems were as follows: 1. Cycle -let Wastewater Treatment and Recycling System 2. RotoDisk system 3. Cromoglas Wastewater Treatment Systems. 0 0 Cycle -let garnered their reputation specializing in recycling wastewater into usable flushwater for toilets and urinals. This approach is ideally suited to areas with low soils permeability. By recycling the water the site discharge to ground can be substantially reduced. The Cycle -let process utilizes sequential suspended growth treatment in first an anoxic tank section followed by an aerobic tank section. In lieu of clarification, the process utilizes ultra -filtration for solids removal. Investigations showed that this system required substantial maintenance and was subject to frequent breakdown / clogging. The Roto -Disk system uses RBC technology, an attached growth system to provide for biological treatment. Like the Cycle -let system, carbonaceous and nitrogenous removal take place in one aerobic stage and denitrification takes place in a separate anoxic stage. Solids separation takes place in a clarification chamber similar to an Imhoff tank, but the wastewater is "filtered" through a floating layer of plastic globules. These globules serve as a physical barrier to solids transfer into the effluent. The Roto -disk system has been used primarily in Canada and saw use on the Alaska Pipeline project. It never substantially penetrated the US market and its popularity has waned through the 1990's. Unlike the other two systems / processes, the Cromaglass system uses a single treatment stage to provide both aerobic and anoxic conditions. The air to the system is simply turned off and on in sequential periods to alternate aerobic and anoxic conditions within the same tank section. This substantially reduces the size of the tankage necessary for treatment. Solids removal is accomplished by standard clarification methods. Naylor Engineering, P.C. (MEPC) introduced the concept to Suffolk County in 1990 as the first alternative to the underground denite systems that were then subject to a moratorium. After three years of effort, NEPC was able to convince Suffolk County officials that the system provided a better alternative to systems currently in use. Since that time, we have designed Cromaglass systems in locations from Massachusetts to Maryland. Historical data shows that, by far, the Cromaglass systems have outperformed every other type of treatment system in use here on Long Island more consistently meeting permits and getting reductions effluent concentrations to significantly lower levels than competing systems. Earlier this year SCDHS adopted and released a new design standard (Appendix A) specifically to accommodate Cromaglass system. Based upon a dozen years of experience with the system, Suffolk County reduced setbacks by a factor of 2.5 as it was observed that these systems had no significant noise and odor impacts on the immediate surrounding area. A presentation was made to the Town of Southampton just this past October which was broadcast on the local television channel. Copies are available from the Town as well as Cromaglass. The Cromaglass system has also previously been approved in the Town of Southold. The Cliffside / Breezy Sound project was to be constructed using such a system but a last minute agreement with the Village of Greenport provided a more expedient solution. The systems are routinely approved throughout the United States for direct discharge to streams, lakes and rivers. For example, two years ago this office completed the design of a 12,000 GPD system which serves the Fairview County Club in Greenwich, Connecticut. This treatment system discharges directly in the golf course's surface ponds or "water hazards", which in turn overflow into a nearby river. At other locations, the system effluent is used for drip and other means of site irrigation. With regard to this specific project, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) has determined that the allowable "flow density", that is the amount of wastewater that local geology and hydrology on the north fork can absorb without negative impact on the environment, is equivalent to two houses per acre. The table below computes Sanitary Flow discharges to the environment comparing the impact of the Gaia Holistic Center as proposed with that of what SCDHS would permit in this area (28 single family homes) using septic tanks and leaching pools. Effluent Parameters Comparison Density Flow (GPD) I Dische a Conc. in m Discharge in Ibs/da BOD* I TSS I Total N BOD TSS Total N Proposed Project After Croma lass Treatment 15,000 15 15 6.0 1.88 1.88 0.75 28 Single Famiy Homes 3 Bedroom After Septic Tank & Leaching Pools Homes 1 8,400 1 158 1 55 1 55.3 1 11.07 1 3.85 3.87 14 Single Fam' Homes 3 Bedroom After Septic Tank & Leaching Pools 1 acre zoning) Homes 1 4,200 1 158 1 55 1 55.3 1 5.53 1 1.93 1 1.94 7 Single Fami!Z Homes 4-5 Bedroom After Septic Tank & Leaching Pools 2 acre zoning) Homes 1 2,800 1 158 1 55 1 55.3 1 3.69 1 1.28 1 1.29 Based upon the above, it is readily apparent that development of this site with single family homes at the density permitted by local SCDHS regulations would have almost six (5.89) times the impact on the environment with respect to Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), more than twice (2.05) the impact with respect to Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and over five (5.16) times the impact with respect to Total Nitrogen. In addition, the analysis shows that the impact on the environment of the proposed project is still substantially less than what would be expected under residential development at 1 acre or 2 acre zoning. We have attached three (3) copies of the Cromaglass Brochure which provides a detailed description as to how the process works and includes various photos of the installation procedure as well as one (1) copy of the "Engineer's Packet". 0 0 If desired, additional projects summaries / newsletters can be forwarded to you under separate cover from Mr. Lou Kircher of E3 Environmental, who serves as the local system representative in the Long Island area. These sample projects include the Fairview Country Club project addressed above, other area projects as well as numerous projects located adjacent to or directly discharging to surface waters. If you have any specific questions in this regard or require any additional printed materials for the treatment system, please contact Mr. Kircher directly @ (516) 746-2618. Very truly y rs;' NAYLO NGINEERING, P.C. J Na or, E. resi ent cc: Pat Moore, Esq. Lou Kircher (E3 Environmental R:\r.e0em\ChNo332JobNoO 1\pgs5-8 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ter ?echnoloo Since 1965. Cromaglass Wastewater TYPICAL CYCLE Treatment Systems FILL: AERATION DESIGNED as a continuously Flow enters the Solids Retention fed activated sludge process Section (A) which is separated by non - with clarifiers that are operated corrosive screen. Inorganic solids are on a batch basis. retained behind the screen. Organic solids are broken by turbulence created All Cromaglass treatment Sys- with mixed liquor being forced through tems operate on identical screen by submersible aeration pumps. principles: Turbulent aeration of This eliminates the need for mechanical incoming wastes and batch comminution. treatment of bio -mass in sepa- rate aeration and quiescent AERATION settling chamber. Liquid and small organic solids pass through the screen into the continuing DISCHARGED effluent is an Aeration Section (B). Air and mixing are odorless liquid, almost clear in provided by submersible pumps with color, with a reduction in BOD venturi aspirators that receive air through and Suspended Solids over pipe intake from the atmosphere. 90%. Even higher efficiencies can be achieved if required. DENITRIFICATION (OPTIONAL) Provided by an anoxic period during the DENITRIFICATION is now regular treatment cycle. Cromaglass mandated in many areas and units create anoxic conditions by closing Cromaglass Systems are the air intakes of the aeration pumps capable of Denitrification with with electric valves. This stops aeration, the addition of an anoxic cycle but the system continues mixing. following aeration. TRANSFER/SETTLE Per -batch cycling is 120-240 Treated mixed liquor is transferred by minutes. Optimum quality stan- pumping to the Clarification Section (C). dards are maintained even The transfer period overfills the Clarifier at peak intake levels because with the excess spilling through over - of batch -transfer and batch- flow weirs back into the main Aeration reserve functions. Section. Transfer ceases and Clarifier (C) is isolated — solids separation Proven effluent quality is at- occurs under quiescent conditions. tested to by independent lab- oratory research and testing. DISCHARGE National standards such as After settling, effluent is pumped out of established by the National the Clarifier (C) for discharge. Return Sanitation Foundation and sludge is from the bottom of the Clarifier Federal EPA have been sur- (C) back into the main Aeration Sec - passed. Effluent quality is ac- tion (B) using a submersible pump, or cepted for RECYCLE use with sludge can be wasted to a Sludge irrigation and toilet flushing. Processing Tank. • Thoroughly Tested • Modular Construction • Easily Expanded • Lightweight Cromaglass° BENEFITS • No Offensive Noise or Odors • Easily Installed • Positive Discharge • "Flow Thru" Eliminated • Accepts Overload • Automatic Controls • Monitoring 24 Hours • Noncorrosive PROVEN QUALITY Assurance of treatment quality has been accom- plished through independent laboratory research and testing supported by sampling from installed systems (results available upon request). National Standards as established by Federal EPA and the National Sanitation Foundation have been surpassed. Effluent quality with over 90-95% reduction of BOD and Suspended Solids enables Cromaglass to be designed where other methods are not acceptable. Recycled effluent is currently being used for landscape irrigation and as a toilet flushing medium. Effluent Sample from Model CA -120 Showing Surface Discharge by Irrigation System. COST-EFFECTIVE SMALL COMMUNITY SYSTEMS Treatment of wastewater in small communities and schools located beyond a municipal system presents a challenge to consulting engineers. Cromaglass Systems offer a cost-effective alternative solution. Many of these professionals have turned to the Cromaglass Batch Treat Process, an alternative and innovative technology assessed favorably by Federal EPA to be used where conventional sewer- age systems are unavailable or not cost effective. This modular concept design has proven less costly and more environmentally sound than other sewer- age installations. Several schools as well as small community projects have specified Cromaglass. REDUCED DRAIN FIELD SIZE AND SURFACE DISCHARGE CAPABILITIES Because of the clear, odorless quality and high treat- ment standards of Cromagiass Systems, drain field size can be reduced substantially from that required for conventional systems. With optional disinfection added, these systems are permitted for surface dis- charge under conditions normally unsuitable for sub- surface disposal. All tanks in place ready for backfill. Note concrete pads and stain- less steel tie -down rods. ADEQUATE OVERLOAD RESERVE Batch Processing is capable of high treatment even under a wide range of flows as found in growing communities. Also with varying organic loadings of commercial, school and institutional use, excellent effluent standards are maintained. This feature is an integral part of the system to cover temporary emer- gencies or upsets. DESIGN FEATURES Models CA5 • CA12 • CA15 • Reserve volume • Strong fiberglass capacity evens out — — construction. flow during peak Corrosion -free tank use periods. \ �� r F �� , / and piping. • Primary compartment reduces solids and J r speeds decomposition. • Dual compartment audible/visual alarm • Submerged pumps sensors. provide agitation and heat transfer to tank liquid for maximum • Automatic pump bacterial action during discharge permits cold weather. No uniform drainfield wasted energy. dosing. NOISE AND ODORS CONTROLLED Attractive tank modules with locked maintenance hatchways enable Cromaglass Systems to be installed without odors or noise associated with other types of open sewage treatment plants, when operated properly. Tanks can be installed below ground close to buildings being served — saving unneeded pipe and/or pump expense. BY-PASS NOT POSSIBLE Cromaglass Systems are designed to make by- pass and intertank contamination impossible. When operated properly, no bio -mass can transfer from one section to another except through the programmed pumping system. All sludge collected in the settling chamber is automatically returned to the aeration section for further aeration and breakdown. This results in low sludge accumulation. Most residual sludge that collects is made up of biological ash and insoluble particles. Sludge can also be wasted to a Sludge Processing Tank. MAXIMUM OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY PROVIDED BY PLC CONTROLS State -of -the -Art PLC controls will respond to the inputs from level sensors and probes in the tanks. The PLC automatically adjusts treatment parameters in response to changes sensed in the influent. It can store a permanent record of all operational functions, which provides information on each function of each cycle for whatever time reference desired. Such information can indicate if service or maintenence is needed, and the operator can then schedule it before a failure occurs. STRONG, LIGHTWEIGHT, and REUSABLE Corrosion -proof vessel construction of strong, lightweight fiberglass. Covers and locking hatches are also of fiber- glass. Tanks are constructed to withstand pressure involved when installed at acceptable depths below ground. Being light in weight means expensive cranes are not required, saving installation costs. Because Cromaglass Systems are completely integrated, compact and transportable, they can be reused, relocated and/or resold when changing circumstances warrant. Lightweight fiberglass mod- ules being off loaded and set in place in the excavation/ concrete pad. This is typically done by backhoe used to ex- cavate the site. Cromaglass Systems can be installed in modules, meaning a lower initial investment. The system can start with one independent module designed to treat the initial loading. As development grows, additional modules can be added as needed. Modules can be added at the initial site, or if more economical, a new treatment site can be used. Because a batch system requires less land area, it can be placed in multiple locations — saving addi- tional piping/pumping cost. Cromaglass Wastewater Treatment Systems are essentially Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR) as opposed to conventional continuous flow activated sludge systems. Treatment is by timed sequences within a single vessel. Continuous flow systems require several vessels, using a larger land area and higher installation costs. Because time functions can easily be changed, an SBR provides custom treatment dependent on vary- ing hydraulic and biological loading up to the designed capacity of the system. PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 CROMAWATCH Cromaglass has introduced one of the industry's first central station monitoring wastewater treatment systems. With the use of a unique combination of telecommu- nication computers, word processors, and dedicated people, the Plant Operator, Cromaglass, and the Servicing Distributor are all notified if a treatment unit should malfunction. The microprocessor is built into the Cromaglass System. This 24-hour monitor will relay over an "800" telephone line to the control center computer the reason for an alarm. An on -duty operator will then call to report a CromaWatch activity. This will assure prompt response to a malfunction. �i,r t�i,•Lzu i � c c�i POWER: 115v/230v - Single Phase. 230v/460v - 3 Phase available. CONTROL PANEL: Nema 1 enclosure standard. Nema 3R, 4, 7 and 12 available. ALARM: Red light mounted on panel with optional audible alarm. Remote monitor to phone preset numbers in case of alarm. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS: Tank - Fiberglass. Comminution Chamber - Fiberglass and noncorrosive screen. Piping and Fittings - Schedule 40 PVC. Metal Fittings - Stainless steel. PUMPS TOTAL HEAD - FEET(METERS) AMPERAGE DISCHARGE VOLUME GALS. (METER') 5 0 52) 10 (3.05) 15 (4,57)120 (6.10) 25 (7.62) M. LOCKED MODEL RUN ROTOR CAPACITY - G.P.M. (I -MIN.) 7'11" (2.4m) AMPS. AMPS. 1/4 RP 30 (114) 26 (98) 20 (76) 12 (45) GO 10 15.6 DISCHARGE CA -12 11'3" (3.4m) 57" (1.7m) 57" (1.7m) 1020 (463) 1200 (4.5) 200 (.76) 1/3 H.P. 85 (322) 70 (265) 52 (197) 35 (132) 14 (53) 9A 322 WE0311 M 57" (1.7m) 1020 (463) 1500 (57) 260 (.98) 6 1358 (5.1) 11.0 1/2 H . 150 (567) 120 (454) 90 (340) 52 (196) S(30) 14.5 34.9 WS0511B 420(l.6) 6 2910(11,0) 23.0 8,5 21.0 30a - 120v 1 HS', 14'10"(4.5m) 6'10"(2.1m) 6'10"(2.1m) 2070(939) 3000(11.4) 400(1.51) 8 WS1012B - 180 (681) 157 (595) 127 (481) 95 (360) 12.3 74" (2.2m) ADDITInNAI RVATFAA CPFCIFICATInNS MODEL LENGTH WIDTH HEIGHT SHIPPING WEIGHT LBS. (KG.) 24 HR. MAX. CAPACITY GALS. (METER) DISCHARGE VOLUME GALS. (METER') DISCHG. PER DAY TANK VOLUME GALS. (W) AERATION CAPABILITY #044 HR. ORGANIC LOADINC MAX. BOD, PER 24 HRS. ELECTRICAL CONSUMPTION KWH24 HRS. TOTAL AMPS. REQUIRED 12v123Dv CA -5 7'11" (2.4m) 57' (17m) 5'7" (1.7m) 704 (319) 500 (1.9) 85(.32) 6 923 (3.5) GO 2.7 lbs. 8.0 15a - 120v CA -12 11'3" (3.4m) 57" (1.7m) 57" (1.7m) 1020 (463) 1200 (4.5) 200 (.76) 6 1358 (5.1) 9.0 3.8 &0 15a - 120v CA -15 111" (3.4m) 57" (1.7m) 57" (1.7m) 1020 (463) 1500 (57) 260 (.98) 6 1358 (5.1) 11.0 3.8 10.0 15a - 120v CA -25 1410" (4.5m) 610" (2.1m) 6'10" (2.1m) 1720 (780) 2500(g.5) 420(l.6) 6 2910(11,0) 23.0 8,5 21.0 30a - 120v CA -30 14'10"(4.5m) 6'10"(2.1m) 6'10"(2.1m) 2070(939) 3000(11.4) 400(1.51) 8 2910(11.0) 38.0 8.5 55/66' 60a -230v CA -50 19'5" (5.9m) 74" (2.2m) 8'3" (2.5m) 2684 (1217) 5000 (18.9) 625 (2.37) 8 4590 (18.7) 38.0 12.4 55/65' 60a - 230v CA -60 ITS' (5.9m) 74" (2.2m) FT (2.5m) 2684 (1217) 6000 (22.7) 625 (2.37) 10 4590 (18.7) 36.0 12.4 55/65' 60a - 230v CA -100 42'10" (13,1 m) T4" (2.2m) 8'3" (2.5m) 4885 (2216) 10,000 (37.9) 1000 (3.79) 10 9186 (34.8) 73.0 28.1 BOOS* 100a - 230v CA -120 4210" (13.1m) T4" (2.2m) 8'3" (2.5m) 4885 (2216) 12,000 (45.4) 1000 (379) 12 9186 (34.8) 69.0 28.1 60/78' 100a - 230v CA -150 42'10" (13.1 m) 7'4" (22m) 8'3" (2.5m) 4950 (2245) 15,000 (56.8) 1250 (47) 12 1 9186 (34.8) 1 100.0 1 26.6 1 82/100' 1 100a - 23Gv on biological and hydraulic loading, electrical 'System Specifications are subject to change without notice. 4 PROCESS DESCRIPTION . 2AIR INTAKE � JUNCTION BOX LJ I STANDBY LEVEL 1q'.S VIEW: A -A CONTACT CLARIFIER 2' OUTLET 1 Aerobic Wastewater Treatment Plant Model CA -50 11 Sludge Return Pump 2 Tank Model CA -50 12 Aeration Pump P1 & P2 3 Manhole 13 Float - Sludge Return Ft 4 Cover 14 Float - Discharge F1 5 Baffle 15 Float - Discharge Alarm 6 Concave Baffle 16 Float - Discharge Shut Off 7 Support Baffle 17 Float - Dual Aeration 8 Screen Baffle 18 Float - High Water Alarm 9 Discharge Pumps - Duplex 19 Floating Discharge Assembly 10 Transfer Pump CROMAGLASS Corporation Represented By: P. O. Box 3215, 2902 North Reach Road Williamsport, PA 17701 Phone: (570)326-3396• Fax: (570) 326-6426 Email: mailinfo@cromaglass.com • www.cromaglass.com 11 BUTT • OTRUBA-O'CONNOR AR 'TECTS 1062 Northern Blvd. ROSLYN, NY 11576 (5 16 625.6625 p ;%(X At)(_TS QI�1 Lj. At/ 4 I52 � T WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE Approved as submitted Approved as noted Returned for corrections ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: �:fl If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at nce. BUTT • OTRUBA-O'CONNOR A,`11TECTS 1062 Northern Blvd. ROSLYN, NY 11576 (516) 625.6625 TO 11301, — . LAS. DATE JOB NO. �2 22� t'f 2D3139 ATTENTION Yy6--*Zo RE: _77 DEC 2 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the followin items: > ❑ Shop drawings Prints ❑ Plans � � ❑ Sar p es ----"Li Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ .Change order ❑• - COPIES i DATE I • NO. DESCRIPTION a a _� /�= IL iIt tiar THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ X'For your use ❑ ❑ As requested ❑ XFor review and comment Ii ❑ FORBIDS DUE Approved as submitted Approved as noted Returned for corrections ❑ ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once Butt•Otruba-O'Connor Architects, AIA 1062 Northern Boulevard Roslyn, New York 11576 Tel. (516) 625.6625 Fax. (516) 625.6629 28 December 2005 -1 Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer DEC ? 8 Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Site Plan Review Application Gaia Holistic Center Shipyard Lane Town of Southold, New York Dear Mr. Semon Attached please find the Site Plan Review Application for the Gaia Holistic Center. The following is a list of drawings provided for your review: Architectural Site Drawings - 9 copies C-1.0 Architectural Site Plan C-2.0 Zoning, Location Map and Building Data C-4.0 Use Diagram Civil (by Young and Young) C-1 Landscape Plan C-2 Grading and Drainage Plan C-3 Grading and Drainage Details C-4 Existing Conditions Architectural Plans and Elevations – 9 sets Aa -1.1 Transient Motel Ground Floor Plan Aa -1.2 Transient Motel Second Floor Plan Aa -1.3 Transient Motel Roof Plan Aa -3.1 Transient Motel Exterior Elevations Ab -1.1 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Ground Floor Plan Ab -1.2 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Second Floor Plan Ab -1.3 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Roof Plan 12/28/05 t Ab -3.1 Five Unit Sleeping Rooms Exterior Elevations Ac -1.1 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Ground Floor Plan Ac -1.2 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Second Floor Plan Ac -1.3 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Roof Plan Ac -3.1 Three Unit Sleeping Rooms Exterior Elevations Ad -1.1 Transient Motel Private Cafeteria Dining Hall (Private Restaurant) Annex Ground Floor Plan Ad -1.2 Transient Motel Private Cafeteria Dining Hall (Private Restaurant) Annex Roof Plan Ad -3.1 Transient Motel Private Cafeteria Dining Hall (Private Restaurant) Annex Exterior Elevations Af-1.1 Manager's Residence Ground Floor Plan Af-1.2 Manager's Residence Second Floor Plan Af-1.3 Manager's Residence Roof Plan Ag -1.1 Pool House Ground Floor Plan Ah -1.1 Maintenance/Utility Building Ground Floor Plan Environmental Site Assessment Report (by Longshore Environmental) — 2 copies Traffic Impact Study (by Dunn Engineering) — 2 copies Environmental Assessment Form — Long Version (by Cramer Consulting Group) — 2 copies If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me in the office. Respectfully Submitted, :� �L-& Edward P. Butt Partner 12/29/05 1 Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: / l Subject:t�l f� #OU571 G CI K-GL-E- SCTM#: 1000 -3 or — 7 . 7. 1 Date: Comments: �itS� h fn4�» ro-r. i�,Lv�c-w �ui`iC ,LYJY,- FORM NO. 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. ✓" NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: July 5, 2004 RENEWED & AMENDED: October 26.2005 TO: Patricia Moore A/C Oki -Do Ltd. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Suer r9 Please take notice that your application dated March 17, 2004 For permit for construction of transient motel a single family dwelling a restaurant and a private marina at Location of property: 2835 Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 38 Block 7 Lot 7.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The prol2osed construction on this conforming 800,624 square foot lot in the M -II District is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 100-239.4 B. All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead concrete wall riprap, or similar structure exists and which are adjacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead." Following the proposed construction the proposed project will have a 48 -foot setback to the existing bulkhead. In addition the proposed transient motel use and proposed restaurant use require special exception approval from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to Section 100- 121. Site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board will also be required. This Notice of Disapproval was amended following changes in the scope o f the Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File, ZBA, Planning TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Patricia Moore A/C Oki -Do Ltd. .51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated March 17, 2004 For permit for construction of resort hotel/motel at Location of property: 2835 Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 38 Block 7 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Lot 7.1 DATE: July 5, 2004 The proposed construction on this conforming lot in the M -II District is not permitted pursuant to Article XII Section 100-121.A., which states, "Permitted Uses." A resort hotel/motel is not a permitted use in the M -II District. In addition the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4 B "All buildings or structures located on lots upon which a bulkhead concrete wall, riprap, or similar structure exists and which are adjacent to tidal water bodies other than sounds shall be 'set back not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead." Following the proposed construction the proposed proiect will have a 48 foot setback to the existing bulkhead. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced applica ayi}pgyire L further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Cc: File ZBA Southold Town Planning Boar PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR June 21, 2004 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: h�o��gUFFO(,�coG o s� w x W • PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: (1) Malon Site Plans (2) Oyster Factory P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 Enclosed are the following extra Malon site plan maps for your files: 3 maps dated April 28, 2003 1 map last revised Feb. 27,2003 Also attached for your information is a memo dated May 18 from the Landmark Preservation Commission regarding Demolition of Oyster Factory in East Marion. Very tr you , Bru em Senior Site Plan Reviewer encs. ��suFFot� c =moo OGy� �Gi 0 Fax (516) 765-1823 Go Z Town Hall 53 Road Telephone (516) 765-1800 O((��a 0. o y�ol �ao� Q U� 40 0 11971 I IJ MAY 1 9 2004 SOUTHOLD TOWN I `--southo d Town LANDMARK PRESERVATION TO: Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chair — Planning Board FROM: Herb Adler, Jr. Chair — Landmark Preservation Comm. DATE: May 18, 2004 RE: Demolition of Oyster Factory in East Marion on Shipyard Lane Tax Map #38-7-7.1, SPLIA No. EM 5 At the request of Bruno Semon and of the architect for t:ie owner of the above Oyster Factory and before any formal notice for our r,'pinion,members of the Landmark Preservation Commission visited the site. It is our opinion that the chimney is a beautiful structure and should be saved and, if possible, be incorporated into the final design. Furthermore, the conveyor machine is an interesting structure and is worthy of saving, as part of the culture of the fishing processing industry, as it existed in Southold 50 years ago. 0�0 Fax (516) 765-1823 H Z Town Hall.5 Road Telephone (516) 765-1800 O FRFoo 11971 � 2004 SOUTHOLD TOWN I `� Southo d Town LANDMARK PRESERVATION TO: Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chair — Planning Board FROM: Herb Adler, Jr. Chair — Landmark Preservation Comm. DATE: May 18, 2004 RE: Demolition of Oyster Factory in East Marion on Shipyard Lane Tax Map #38-7-7.1, SPLIA No. EM 5 At the request of Bruno Semon and of the architect for the owner of the above Oyster Factory and before any formal notice for our opinion,members of the Landmark Preservation Commission visited the site. It is our opinion that the chimney is a beautiful structure and should be saved and, if possible, be incorporated into the final design. Furthermore, the conveyor machine is an interesting structure and is worthy of saving, as part of the culture of the fishing processing industry, as it existed in Southold 50 years ago. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR May 14, 2004 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Oki-Do/Gala Holistic Circle 2835 Shipyard Lane, E. Marion SC Tax Map # 1000-38-7-7.1 P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 For your information, enclosed is a letter received from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services regarding the above site plan. Sincerely, -Brun Semo Senior Site Plan Reviewer Enc. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Town Hall — 53095 State Route 25 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Oki- Do Site Plan Dear Mr. Semon: LINDA MERMELSTEIN, M.D., M.P.H. ACTING COMMISSIONER May 6, 2004 L M�av -1 Southold Town u"-, -- gni' The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS: "Department") has received the proposed site plan for above captioned proposal. Based on our preliminary evaluation of the proposal, we believe the potential magnitude and significance of project related impacts is sufficient to require the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). In addition, the Department offers the following comments. The SCDHS wishes to reserve its right to provide additional information and technical comment during the review process for this action. These comments should not be construed as an implicit approval or rejection of the project by the SCDHS. I. Article VI Application Status The Office of Wastewater Management has no record of a current commercial application for the proposed action as required by Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC). The project sponsor is encouraged to submit an application to our agency's Bureau at the earliest possible date so that a complete technical assessment of this proposal can be undertaken. Based on the limited information provided it is impossible to determine if the proposal can conform to the density requirements of Article VI of the Sanitary Code. II. SCDHS General Requirements and Jurisdiction The applicant must comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and relevant construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review of this project. These considerations are reviewed completely at the time of SCDHS application. ♦DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ♦ OFFICE OF ECOLOGY ♦ RIVERHEAD COUNTY CENTER ♦ RIVERHEAD NY 11901-3397 Phone (631) 852-2077 Fax(631)852-2743 Under the authority of the Ar, .es IV, V, and VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, the SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of the sewage disposal and water supply systems. The applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health Department approval. III. Sewage Treatment and Public Water Supply The preliminary proposal does not indicate whether the improvements will be serviced by a sewage treatment facility, nor where that facility would be located. The Office of Ecology is concerned with the proposed siting of a new wastewater treatment facility in the Orient Harbor/Peconic Bay groundwater contributing area. Additional point source nitrogen loading could facilitate further degradation of this already stressed complex within the bounds of the Peconic Estuary Study Area. Dating back to the late 1980's, the Brown Tide Comprehensive Assessment and Management Plan recommended the policies of "no net increase" of point source nitrogen loading to the surface waters and "no substantial degradation of groundwater" in the Peconic River Watershed based on extensive monitoring and mathematical modeling of impacts of management alternatives (Suffolk County Department of Health Services, published in 1992, pages 7-74 and 7-82). The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has a long-standing policy, which disfavors the proliferation of small wastewater treatment facilities, where consolidation of wastewater treatment is feasible (see, e.g., Wastewater Management Study - Portion of North Central Brookhaven, H2M, 1991). Every effort should be made to effect the connection of new developments to existing nearby sewage treatment plants, wherever viable" (Wastewater Management Study, p. 4.18). In this case, the Village of Greenport STP. Based on the preliminary information provided the total potential sanitary sewage flow cannot be clearly established. Plans for a multi use- development sewage treatment facility would also require an evaluation of groundwater quality impacts, proximity to public water supply well fields, location of private wells, subsurface soil conditions and mitigation measures. The DEIS should investigate alternative septic designs including sequencing batch reactors (SBR's) for the complex. The DEIS should discuss the water supply requirements for the overall project and demonstrate public water supply availability as the Suffolk County Water Authority has restricted the number of new connections to its system in Southold Township. IV. Natural Resources The DEIS should provide a detailed assessment of the areas terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The document should identity potential short and long term impacts to wildlife species as a result of the proposed action. The document should evaluate (in detail sufficient for comparative assessment) project design alternatives, which maximize protection of natural features. The document should also detail the plans for the dock area. Will it be refurbished, provide docking for vessels, there number and size, the need for dredging, and the disposition of dredge spoil. V. Flood Hazard Area The subject parcel is located within a designated flood hazard area. All related local state and federal regulations which apply to this area should be discussed in the DEIS. In addition, the document should explain how the proposed action and alternatives to the proposed action have been designed to conform to such regulations. VI. Alternatives The public acquisition interest of Suffolk County regarding this property should be considered fully in any discussion of alternative actions. In addition we recommend that the DEIS evaluate development proposals which provide for t.. _ maximum protection of the property's wetlands shoreline and low lying areas. VII. Peconic Estuary Program Comprehensive Conservation Management Plan The subject parcel was identified as a high protection priority through the Peconic Estuary Program Critical Lands Protection Strategy (CLPS) process in the Town of Southold. The CLPS evaluates the land available for development in the Peconic Study Area in order to identify priorities for protection with respect to estuarine management concerns. This developed but sub dividable parcel satisfies two of the four attributes used in prioritizing CLPS parcels. A majority of the parcel is within the 1000 -foot boundary from the bay coastline and portions of the parcel are identified in the United States Fish and Wildlife Services' 1994 National Wetlands Inventory. Our records also show that this land is listed on the Town's Community Preservation Fund parcel list. Land protection provides huge benefits to a watershed and its residents. Some of these benefits include: • Protection of water quality • Preservation of concentrated or uncommon wildlife and their habitat • Less traffic congestion and infrastructure investments • Aesthetic values that contribute to quality of life • Increased public access and recreational opportunities VIII. Summary The Suffolk County Department of Health believes that the level of review provided through the DEIS process is essential to a responsible assessment of this proposal. We strongly encourage the consideration of alternative actions, which minimize potential impacts to the site. Thank you for the opportunity to review this preliminary proposal and look forward to reviewing the DEIS when it is completed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2077. Sincerely, Kimberly Shaw Principal Environmental Analyst Office of Ecology KS/amf cc: Walter Hilbert, P.E. PLANNING BOARD MEMBb-.9 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR April 26, 2004 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: East Marion Fire District Letter for the Site Plan on Oki -Do 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Mrs. Moore, P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax(631)765-3136 Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated April 8, 2004 from the East Marion Fire District. i Please review the enclosed letter and respond in writing if in agreement with the request. Please revise the site plan as required based on the comments of the Fire District. Submit the revised site plan to the Planning Board for review; we will need the revision to continue the site plan process. Please expedite the submittal information so we can process this application further. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Ie ullours, n Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file INNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN H. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR April 23, 2004 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 F. (631) 765-3136 Re: GALA, Hollistic Circle, OKI -DO 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion, NY SCTM# 1000-38-07-7.1 Zone MII Dear Mrs. Moore, This letter is to inform you that the above listed site plan application was reviewed at the Architect Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on April 15, 2004. Attached you will find a copy of the minutes from the meeting and comments. Please review the minutes and inform us in writing if you we in agreement with the conditions. Please modify the site plan, constmction plans and submit the revised plans to the Planning Board. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 ext. 229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Resp fully urs, B emo Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. ARC minutes Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: &7r OFF -06A -CK6A1A16n- 4rte�17F,--T-S /O62 lkkK-IHF� .64,VO, IP43(-YAC Av' I/s-7.6 571 6aS-a6atr Subject: O,K/ /)O 1'7" ,Cp 13urr SCTM#: 1000 - Date: 000 -Date: /s APR 16 2004 Comments:j6V�S�U Spj� c..thnld Town SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE April 15, 2004 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m. Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co -Chairman. Robert I. Brown, Co -Chairman Herbert Adler, Jr. Landmarks Preservation Committee Howard Meinke, Cutchogue Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary APR 19 2004 Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, Stacy Jacobson, Esq. and Marco A. Neves, R.A. for CVS Pharmacy; Diane Herald R.A. and John Rose for the First Baptist Church of Cutchogue; and Patricia Moore, Esq.. Danita Otruba-O'Connor and Edward Butt, R.A.'s for GAIA Holistic Circle. Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Herbert Adler, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of March 4, 2004. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CUTCHOGUE (North Road - Curtchogue) Because the simulated brick veneer approved at the March 4 meeting was not satisfactory in its appearance, the applicant's representatives proposed the use of Cedar Impressions vinyl shingles on all sides and horizontal siding of the same material in the gables., all in snow color. Moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Howard Meinke it was RESOLVED to accept this modification with the CONDITION that a sample of the trim color be submitted for approval Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recission of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. 1670 HOUSE (North Road - Southold) Garrett Strang recused himself. It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Howard Meinke to APPROVE the addition of an external stair in the rear of the building required as an emergency exit by the addition of a second floor within the existing structure. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. hipyard Lane - East Marion) The representatives of the applicant described a 108 unit healing, meditation and hotel facility on the 18 acre site with a circular main building to contain a 200 seat restaurant., all in the Japanese style of architecture. The grounds will have a 30 foot waterfall and small man-made lakes, emphasizing circular patterns and Japanese landscaping but with local plantings. It was subsequently RESOLVED Town Board by Howard Meinke and seconded by Herbert Adler to APPROVE the project CONCEPTUALLY, subject to detailed submissions, and to strongly RECOMMEND that the Planning Board "land bank' as much of the parking as possible. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. CVS PHARMACY (Main Road - Mattituck) Following a presentation of the proposed project, it was RESOLVED by Robet Brown and seconded by Herbert Adler to APPROVE the proposal with the CONDITIONS that the divided light windows be continued across the remaining 2 bays on North elevation and in the first and third bays from the North on the East elevation (with the understanding that these may be display windows), that the roofing will be architectural shingles, that pavers or red stamperete be used for the internal sidewalks, that drawings of the ground signage be submitted for approval and that the building mounted light fixtures be clarified (a preference for soffit fixtures was expressed).. Vote of Committee: Ayes all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recision of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. CUTCHOGUE HARBOR MARINA (3350 West Creek Avenue - Cutchogue) The Committee reviewed the photographs and documentation submitted by the applicant. Inasmuch as no new structures or activities are proposed, it was RESOLVED by Garrett Strang and seconded by Robert Keith to thank the Planning Board but to acknowledge that there are NO ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTERISTICS upon which to comment. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. RMB REALTY (North Road - Southold) Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Howard Meinke, it was RESOLVED to RETAIN the orientation of the buildings as originally presented, to RECOMMEND that the internal sidewalks be brick and that dumpsters not be located end along either the North Road or Hortons Lane. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. Robert W. Keith Secretary SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, New York 11769 (631) 589-5200 Fax (631)589-5268 April 14, 2004 Bruno Semon Town of Southold Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Re: SCTM #: 1000-38.-7-7.1 Project Name: Oki -Do Location: 2835 Shipyard Lane East Marion, N.Y. Dear Mr. Semon: The Suffolk County Water Authority(SCWA) has received your agency referral letter that requests comments on the above referenced project. The SCWA suggests that the applicable topics on the enclosed checklist be addressed as part of the environmental review for this project. Where appropriate, the Planning Board should incorporate the mitigative measures as covenants and restrictions on the project if it is approved. Please keep us apprised of this project. If you have any questions concemmg our comments, please don't hesitate to give me a call at 631-563-0306. Sincerely, e2obtse Sr. Environmental Analyst Enclosure H:\PineB\SCWA Dev Review\southold_agency_refenTal request.wpd Environmental Review Checklist A. Water Resources (Groundwater) 1. Location and description of aquifers and recharge areas a. quality b. quantity C. seasonal variation d. depth to water table 2. Identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater a. private water supply b. public water supply C. location of existing wells d. agricultural uses e. commercial/Industrialuses f. seasonal variation B. Land Use and Zoning 1. Existing land use and zoning a. description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area b. description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area C. description of any affected agricultural district or other farmland retention program boundary in and surrounding the site 2. Description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area a. Southold Master Plan b. Southold Water Supply Management and Watershed Strategy C. Special Groundwater Protection Area Plan C. Public Water Service 1. Existing facilities 2. Current usage levels 3. Projected future usage levels 4. Projected future facilities D. Significant Environmental Impacts - Identify those aspects identified in above Items A. B. and C., that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action including cumulative impacts as measured against Southold Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy and provide discussion. E. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmental Impacts - Describe mitigative measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Item D. Mitigative measures include, but are not limited to: 1. Clustering development. 2. Limiting clearing to retain maximum undisturbed recharge areas. 3. Conserving open space and placing conservation easements to protect these areas. The project should be designed in context of adjoining areas to maintain unfragmented, contiguous open space to maximize the benefit of these areas both ecologically and in terms of watershed protection. 4. Limiting fertilizer dependent vegetation to minimize turf areas. 5. Using native plants for landscaping purposes that require less water and are more drought tolerant. 6. Preserving existing native vegetation to the maximum extent practical keeping in mind realistic accessory uses that will likely occur (ie; sheds, pools). A conservation easement should be placed on the preserved area so it is not disturbed for accessory uses. 7. Using natural stormwater management practices (grass swales, filter strips, created wetlands, etc), where possible. 8. Only installing ornamental water features that recycle water. Signs should indicate that water is recycled. These water features should not be operated during a drought. 9. Using porous pavements, and/or minimizing road widths to the extent practical, while still allowing adequate emergency access. 10. Requiring the use of landscape methods that minimize recharge of contaminants. F. Identify adverse environmental effects that cannot be avoided if the project is implemented April 8, 2004 Mr. Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board Town of Southold, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Semon, EAST MARION FIRE DISTRICT Board of Fire Commissioners PO Box 131 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939 (631) 477-0163 Fax (631) 477-8310 Email: EMFDistrict@optonline.net E C E_� APO 9 2004 Tr nn Southnld7a Planning Burn MO The Board of Fire Commissioners, in consultation with the Chief of the Fire Department, have made the following requests in regard to the three projects sent to us for our review. Drawing C1.04hree locations for fire hydrants 2) Request fire access to the marina area for fire protection Hellenic Snack Bar, Main Rd. East Marion 1) Hydrant location at west entrance Cove Beach Estates, Main Rd. East Marion 1) Drawing#1-one electric well location 2) Drawing #3 -three electric well locations Please contact us if further information is required. Thank you very much for requesting our input. Very truly yours Walter Gaipa Fire District Secretary 5vr3,� /?J New York State Department of Environmental Conservation _ Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 v Phone: (631) 444-0403 FAX: (631) 444-0360 - RESPONSE TO AGENCY REFERRAL REQUEST LltAPR LLApril 8, 2004Bruno SemonTown of Southold Planning BoardP.O. Box 1179 _. Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Oki -Do 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 Dear Mr. Semon: Please advise the applicant that the proposed projectwill likely require a Tidal Wetlands permitfrom this office . Sincerely, Sherri Aicher Environmental Analyst PLANNING BOARD MEML .S JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR April 5, 2004 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Scheduled A.R.C. Meeting GAIA Holistic aka Oki -Do; Greenport Heights, Hellenic Hotel SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1;45-04-3.1;35-2-14,15.1 Zone: LI Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765.1938 Fax(631)765-3136 This letter is to inform you that the above -listed site plan applications are set for the Architect Review Committee (ARC) meeting on April 15, 2004 at 4:30 p.m. in the Southold Town Hall Conference Room. Attached is an ARC checklist for your use in preparation for the meeting. / Please submit all materials that need to be presented to the ARC. before the meeting date or bring the materials with you to the meeting. Please inform us in advance if you will not be ready for the meeting date. If there are any questions, you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. �Reespectf_ullyy yours,, Yom' 4 "`"' 9,ur C Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer att. cc: file RICHARD J. LAVALLE, P.E. CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Town of Southold Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971-0957 Attn: Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer COUNTY OF SUFFOLK APF STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS &s CHARLES J. BARTHA, P.E. LESLIE A. MITCHEL COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER March 31, 2004 Re: Oki -Do 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#1000-38: 7-7.1 Gentlemen: This Department has reviewed the above -referenced site plan. Specifically note that: This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for this proposed development. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-4100. W SS/MPC/ln Very truly yours, William S. Shannon, P.E. Chief Engineer By: M. Paul Campagnafa Director of Highway Planning & Permits SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER �1 j 335 YAPHANK AVENUE (630852-4010 111YAPHANK, N.Y. 11980 ■ FAX(631)852-4150 Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice -President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees DATE: March 31. 2004 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Oki -Do 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM#38-7-7.1 �ute3r Town Hall 65 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 With regard to the above -referenced, after a preliminary review of the site plan and an on-site inspection, the Board of Trustees will require the proposed bulkhead be installed behind the rock gabion wall, not in front of. Furthermore, any activity within 100' of the wetland line or seaward of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area will require permits from this office. Should you require any additional information, please don't hesitate to contact the office. Thank you. Sender: Subject: Submission Without a Cover Letter is 7-'f/ 'i J'J SCTM#: T 000- g / -q. ) Ul Date: Commants: MAO 3 1 Ll,i 4 'pO;O T, WI 01 /) ATG. Mar 23 �4 12:40p VIA FACSIMILE 71 re Law Office ?tt PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fav (631)765-4643 Joshua Horton, Supervisor and Southold Town Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1.1.79 Southold, NY 7-1971 Albert. Krupski, President Southold Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 F 7654643 March 23, 2004 Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Michael Verity, Building .Inspector Southold Town Building Department P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: GAIA Holistic Circle OWNER: OKI -DO, LTD. SCTM #1000-30-07-7.1 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: p.? I 2 MAR Pla ld Town The Planning Board has advised me that it is premature to place the above matter on the March 291h work session. I will advise you of the new work session date when scheduled. We are looking forward to working with you. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PCMQ�Tn cc:-Do, Ltd. Edward Butt, Architect PLANNING BOARD MEMBEttS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR March 24, 2004 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ms. Cynthia Goldsmith, Secretary East Marion Fire District P.O. Box 131 East Marion, New York 11939 Dear Ms. Goldsmith: P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax(631)765-3136 Enclosed please find one (1) site plan dated March 17,2003, for Gaia Holistic Circle, located at the southeast end of Shipyard l .ane, East Marion. SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire - wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. O The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Autry ,1;� Bruno Semon Sr. Site Plan Reviewer enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGLSNO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Date: March 23, 2004 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Agency Referral Request *Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals *Southold Town Building Department *Southold Town Board *Southold Town Board of Trustees *Southold Town Engineer *Suffolk County Department of Health Services *NYSDEC - Stony Brook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority *Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works l From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewerl Re: Proposed Site Plan for Oki -Do 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Reviewer: P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 Status: New Active Site Plan. Required Return Date: ASAP The above listed action and site plan is referred to your agency for review, comments, concerns, permits requirements and jurisdiction. This proposed site plan is for build out as follows;new 27 room SPA/ hotel/restaurant with 40,468 sq.ft., center building with 4,341.5 sq.ft., 40 units of sleeping rooms in 9 buildings with 19,206 sq.ft.,36 unit sleeping rooms in 12 buildings with 25,608 sq.ft., managers residence with 2,900 sq.ft., caretakers residence with 1,450 sq.ft.,gate house with 1,060 sq.ft., pool house with 1,060 sq.ft., maintenance bldg. with 1,900 sq.ft.,mechanical equipment bldg. with 1,430 sq.ft., and pool on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone located at approximately south east end of Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM#(s) 1000-38.-7-7.1 Please respond on your agencies position of the above action. Thank you in advance. cc: File *Maps are enclosed for your review PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR March 23, 2004 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 SV04 COD %ko PLANNING BOARI) OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Proposed Site Plan for Oki -Do 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Mrs. Moore, P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 The Planning Board (P.B.) reviewed the new revised site plan at the work session on March 22, 2004. The P.B. would like to thank you for the request to present this project at the March 29, 2004 work session. We must inform you that the project presentation is premature at this time. The P.B.request that you follow up with the Building Department for the Building Inspectors Determination before we schedule a formal work session with the architect and owner. The P.B. also request that the proper application be submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals. When the above is satisfied we will schedule a meeting with the various departments to go over the project. Please be aware that the above referenced site plan is on the agenda for the Architectural Review Committee's March 30, 2004 meeting at 4:30pm. Please be prepared to present the proposed build out. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. R e 4pe y your _s c I';?'/ e 0 Senior 1te P Reviewer CC:file PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 17, 2004 Geri Woodhouse, Chairwoman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 (BY HAND) Re: GAIA Holistic Circle Owner: OKI -Do, Ltd SCTM#1000-38-07-7.1 Dear Chairwoman and Board: MAR 1 7 2004 Town The above referenced site plan has been redesigned to incorporate previous comments from the building department, the number of motel units has been reduced to 108. My client intends to create a world renown spa. The following documents dated March 17, 2004 are herein submitted for the Board's review: Site plan with the location of all structures(C-1.0) Zoning & Building Data (C-2.0) Floor plan of Spa ground floor (A-L1A) Floor plan of Spa second floor (A -1.1B) Center building ground floor (A -1.2A) Sleeping units ground floor plan (A -1.3A) Sleeping units second floor plan (A-1.313) Spa exterior elevations (A -3.1A) Center building exterior elevations (A -3.2A) Sleeping Units exterior elevations (A -3.3A) Engineered site plan will be submitted once the concept plans have been reviewed and approved by the ZBA (Special Exception) and Architectural Review Committee and Planning Board. This site plan has on this date been filed with the building department for review and a notice of disapproval in accordance with the newly adopted procedures. My client would respectfully request that this proj ect be placed on your March 29"' work session. At that work session the architects and the owner wish to make a presentation to the Board. We would also invite the Trustees and ZBA members to attend this meeting. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Very truly }ours, 1-- Pafricia C. Moore cc: Ruth Oliva, Zoning Board Chairwoman Michael Verity, Building Inspector Al Krupski, Trustee President Oki -Do, Ltd. Edward Butt, Architect OFFICE OF BOARD OF APPEALS Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 ....... _ 765-1809 tel. 79 REPLY FORM Dated: pp TO: OKI—DU LTLI_ loon -38--7--7.I Ar Fnsr ,on (b`J Your application is incomplete for the reasons noted below. b190WC L JAN - 7 2004 3A fax. r -63,4S 3 97 ( ) It is requested that the following be forwarded as soon as possible (within about 7 days, if feasible). The advertising deadline is 22 days before the meeting date and the information is necessary for review and advertising purposes. You may forward the information by fax at 765- 9064, however, please send the original by mail. Thank you. ( ) The appeal was not filed within 60 days of the decision of the Building Inspector. (oc) Missing information - please see missing information checked below. Please submit all the documentation, together with information noted below. If you have any questions, please call us at 765-1809. Thank you. Information requested: ( ) Notice of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector after his/her review of this Particular project map. () Check payable to the Town of Southold totaling $ () Signature and notary public information are needed. ( ) An original and six prints of the map were not included. (Preparer's name and date Of preparation to be shown.) () name. Setbacks must be shown for the subject building to all property tines, with preparer's ffisl2ren 59ts of diagran$showing the doors, number of stories /and avera Le tg /h (from natural grade)y-Per Re 4,Lt at,+AOde And ><le fes,/m0 6 �Qi�9S F eight ( ) Ownership Search back to April 23, 1957 for the subject parcel and all adjoining parcels, certified by a title insurance company, and insuring the Town for $25,000. ( ) Copies of all current deeds and tax bills of the parcels back to 64 Other: F Qi i�i l *, Pf3 41•.5 td srA7us OF prrsul3kiss)aa p� �fcivlR eF19 e �olri Ce: Pe. tl� ZO • The Suffolk Times • September 25, 2003 Growing pains Crowd expected for meeting on M -C School plan Much discussion about the Mattituck-Cutchogue School District's proposed $41.2 million jun- ior and senior high school expansion project was expected at a public infor- mation meeting slated for Wednesday night in the high school's auditorium in Mattituck. Everything from the big price tag to a basement wrestling and weight room has been under scrutiny since the school board unveiled the propos- al in July. As expected, sticker shock has prompted a number of people, including some school board mem- bers, to propose whittling costs "The big question is whether to do it as a menu," said school board presi- dent Beverly Wowak on Monday. "We're expecting to hear a lot about that; it's been presented to us several times." A "menu" approach would mean breaking up the project into phases, each with its own bond issue, so that items would be paid for one at a time. Those who support a single bond issue say that subsequent portions of a divided project rarely get voter endorsement after the first part is approved, leaving the overall job unfinished. The biggest ticket "item" is a three -floor wing of seven science rooms and 16 regular classrooms for $12.2 million. New library and media classrooms are estimatedat $4 mil- lion; auditorium, stage and music classrooms at $5.7 million; and that wrestling and weight room is priced at $3.7 million. There's little debate on whether the school needs extra space, according to Ms. Wowak. "That's a given," she said. "In the cafeteria, we have lunches starting at 10 a.m. During one lunchtime, we had to put a group of kids in the auditorium to eat, because there wasn't enough room." The school board, administrators, heads of departments as well as tech- nical experts were expected to be on hand to answer questions at the infor- mational meeting, which took place after this paper's press time. More details will be available next week. After the meeting, the next step, said Ms. Wowak, is for the school board to discuss the public input and continue to disseminate information. Superintendent Kenney Aldrich is scheduled to speak to a number of civic groups throughout the fall, and another public informational meeting is on the calendar for Nov. 13. The school board doesn't expect to vote on the proposal any time soon, said Ms. Wowak. "The earliest would be Feb. 17, but we don't want to do it that week, because it's vacation week and people won't be around," she said. Gwendolen Groocock Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. Nearing Survey Were last winter's heating bills affecting your budget? Did you know that a Weil McLain Boiler can reduce your fuel costs 35%- 40% over your existing system? Are you getting enough hot water from your present system? Have you considered adding a highmefficiency Weil McLain indirect water heater? Is your existing glass -lined hot water heater more than 10 years old? Are you aware that you can flood your basement if the water heater leaks? When have you had the antifreeze checked in your heating system? Did you know that low levels of antifreeze can cause a freeze-uD? Are you aware that oil heat is the most efficier source available? Did you know that electric water heaters and electric heat are the most inefficient energy sources available - and can increase your energy costs as much as 50%? PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR September 10, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Robert Mils, II Oysterponds Union Free School District 23405 Main Road Orient, NY 11957 Re: Site Plan Certification for Oki -Do. 2835 Shipyard Lane EastMarion, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Zoned MII MO7 OMFI r[5] Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax(631)765-3136 We received your correspondence letter dated September 9, 2003 in reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan copy. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. This site plan is proposes the build out as follows; new 25 unit hotel with 21,319 sq.ft., 100 units of a motel with 36,000 sq.ft., restaurant with 10,800 sq.ft., pump house with 283 sq.ft., managers house with 1,200 sq.ft., pyramid house with 576 sq.ft., maintenance bldg. with 3,125 sq.ft., hall bldg. with 8,245 sq.ft., two office bldgs. With 960 sq.ft., showers with 450 sq.ft., and tennis court with 8,825 sq.ft. on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone(s) located at the south east end of Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM#(s) 1000-38.-7-7.1. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Re e fu yours, B oS on Senior Site Plan Reviewer Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Young & Young, dated 05/05/03 and received by the Planning Board 07/29/03 09/09/2603 14:14 1631477:f04 Oysterponds Union Free School District 23405 Main Road Orient, NY 11957 Rita Mattus Superintendent of Schools September 9, 2003 V Mr. Bruno Semon Planning Department Town of Southold Southold NY 11971 Dear Ur. Semon, Telephone (631) 323-2410 Fax (631) 323-3713 Website www.oysterponds.kl2.ny.us The Oysterponds School Board of Education hereby request a review of the site plan submitted to your department pertaining to the former LI Oyster Farms property at the end of Shipyard Lane In East Marion. Sincerely, Robert L. Mills 11 President, Oysterponds Board of Education PAGE 01 P410 -Tis-t- ywol, , , VAO, f41 /6cc,ds le. jr✓J -e-e, (9(1ALs�� Si�44l.d d,(e l I9rAK�'L 4t Mt Y4K4A: o Wb ,J, M65 � 1 c�►tTa-- Tau ov � I N ee,91$4 Coos fti� �v,/a lv3t'Gs3-33= loaj 171 C70 • -C 1�W 3/—SLS- N33 D 117- Z'vd V -76.T-.P9z- (, 3,1 63,1 761- 1S6o CoastasFunrouineD� n1 ��aation Jeffrey L. Seeman. CEP 42 Lewis Road President East Quogue, NY 11942 Phone: 631-653-3399 A Fax 631-653-3451 Email: jlscoast@optonline.net Tel. 631-727-2303 Fax 631-727-0144 TA.. Robert G Tast ARCHITECT YOUNG & YOUNG LAND SURVEYORS 400 OsrM - A WFU R�, NEW Ya 11901 �G3 j� 74 !do Z FRT1: studio a,k . FAX N0. :212 677 7898 61 19 2003 01:18PN P1 111 Fourth Avenue 24190 MW R6M 62N PO. Boy 444 New Vent KY 10003 ori9 , NY 11957 efutlloeb®afalhllnk.!wt t. 2120772ee7 t.4 f. 491322 www. ngwyprk-9ftl'Mo4,cuNepgloph f. 2126777494 1424 FAX TRANSMITTAL to: Mr. Bruno Semon Planning Board, Town of Southold 141, #, 631 76519$8 fax #: 631 765 3136 from: Hideaki Adizumi, AIA re! Oki -DO meeting Minutes Me: Aug. 19, 2003 # popc: 3 (including this cover page) Due to the nature of walk-through, this minutes might have Issues missed being recorded. Please let us know any issues need to be added. Thank you. E00Z 6 L Onv Mal :St.unto a,b • FAX N0. 1212 577 7849 19 2003 01:18PM P2 Mudoae®erothM11knot www nowyork-erak"tectc.corNotudieob OKI -DO CENTER MINUTES 111 Fourth Auanw 02M 24190 Main Read Now York, NY 1WD3 Po. bw 444 b1. 212677 2697 oemm. NY 1195/ fax 212 er7 7696 Id. a fa" 631 3231429 Town &I.e Review, Site Observation Date: Tuesday, August 12, 200: Time: 9:00 AM —10:00 AM Place: Site Present Fim^, Tal. Y Fax* Email At KrupaM Tweed 631 766.1892 331 765.1366 Jeff samumn Coarai 631 653.9369 631 853.3461 iheoaa tdnl:na.nat Envsanmentul Brum Semon Town of 631 765.1938 017615-31136 Sou:hoid. Planner Anis Foster Trustee 031258.7122 531 766.1366 Howard Young Yourv3 8Y0utg 631 7272303 931 727.0144 admin®vounaenoneeritilIM Hideaki Miaumi Studio a/b, 631 323.1426 531 323.1426 aWdioabgheerthlink riet Architects 212677.288? 212677.7898 Maritime and Landscape Issues: A, The rip -rap at the neighboring site was observed. A retaining wall inland of the rip -rap would be allowed In order to support lane elevations needed, as discussed at the last meeting. B. AI Krupski indicated that more slips than are shown on the plan would be allowable in the dredged basin. Howard Young said no commercial marine is planned. Any slips would be for private use only. C. Al Krupski will need to see a iandscape plan for the area east of the basin. The intention is to Preserve this area as much as possible. Preservation of the "dune" was welcomed. Al Krupski reminded all that preserved areas will also require nlaintenanoo, such as clearing new growth unsuitable for a dune. Howard Young mentioned that the plan will be revised by eliminating the 'ground water pond" and minimizing grade changes. D. Al Krupski mentioned that the length of the bulkheac may not extend further into the Bay. It is limited t0 the location of the existing bulkhead. 7"here are bundled plies in line with the bulkhead. The bulkhead shall rot extend to these. Dredging is needed. The dredged sand shall not be removed from the site. It may be used as fill for the site. The course of the basin entry should be reconsidered, since the existing perpendicular form probably will be filled quickly again. Marina contractors may have suggestions. E. On the east side of the basin entry is a sand mound. Most likely this was made from fill by the former dredging. Howard Young asked lit could be removed to open the views or not. Jeff Seeman observed that the mound does not have any plantings that are worth preserving. AI Krupski agreed, since it is not a natural Wflfigcration. F. Phragmites were identified on site and wetionce were flagged to the east of the basin by Jeff Seeman. Y&Y will draw the wetland boundary on the site plan based on the flags. The line will be the origin for the 75 feet setback required by the NYS. For the DEC application, the wetland line, as well as the rip -rap, should be Indicated on the plan- The layout of the units might need to be revised, accordingly FF91 : 3?uu. 5 - o FPS 110. : =12 677 ?898 0 '3• 19 2083 71: =9Pr't P3 II. Fre and Emergency Issues: A. Bruno Semon mentioned tnat the rare track access will also be used for the ambulance access. Ill. Debris removal It is recognized that there are paint, cii, gas tank, and other debris on site, indoor and outdoor, which might harmful to the environment. They should be removed from the site as soon as possible. Enclosures: Cc: Attendees Fie: Minutes030812Site 8116120032:31 PM Minutes by: H. Atfizumi .5 bra 8/12!03 :Swo 10 a/k 61 07 2003 01:0710M P1 111 Fcudh Avwve 02M New Vwk, W 10003 alu"*bQwetKink.W 1.21 z OT? 2887 ww. newywk4I"GCfS CWVSK10e6 i. 2128777898 FAX TRANSMITTAL to: Mr. Bruno Semon Ms. Valerie Scopaz Mr. Victor L'EplaHenier Planning Board, Town of Southold tel. N: 631 765 1938 fax A 63176531$6 fmm Hideaki Arimumi, AIA ro: Oki -DO meeting Minutes dare: Aug. 7 2003 #pages: 5 (including this cover page) 24190 Mein Rood PO. Box 444 OIMM, NV 11957 c a r. 031923 1428 NeOg luuey � won O Mal FP,Jkl : s'tud:c a/b FAX NO, :212 677 7840 07 2003 01:07PM P2 Place: Southold Town Hal! Present: Name 111 Fant Avenue 62M 24160 Main Road Bob Tast Now. Yark, NY 10003 PO. 9" 444 stidlaabVinnWhirknot Ni. 2126772667 Orient, NY 11a67 vnw. newyMh rchkws.mmratudieab to, 212 6777696 ta. i laz 631323 1426 OKI -DO CENTER Town of Southold -- MINUTES Planning Town Site Review Coastal Environmental 631 653.3399 Data: Thursday, July 24, 2003 Coastal Environmental 631 853.3399 Time: 10 AM —12:30 PM Attorney 831 765.4330 Place: Southold Town Hal! Present: Name Firm Tel. # Bob Tast Young & Young 631 727.2303 Al Krupski Trustee 631 765.1892 James Richter Town Engineering 631 765.1560 Valerie Scott= Town of Southold -- Planning Scott Seeman Coastal Environmental 631 653.3399 Jeff Seeman Coastal Environmental 631 853.3399 Pat Moore Attorney 831 765.4330 Bruno Semon Town of Southold, Planner 631 765.1938 Artie Foster Trustee 631 256.7722 Mike Verity Town of Southold, Building 631 765.1602 Inspector Victor L'EplaHenier Southold -Planning Board 831 765.1938 Hideaki Ardzumi Studio alb, Architects 631 323.1426 212 677.2897 Glynis Berry Studio alb, Architects 212 677.2867 Maritime Issues: A. Trustees and other Town Departments prefer to review a plan that shows all phases of development, including ell slips in the marina. Al Krupski indicated that more slips than are shown on the plan would be allowable in the dredged basin. Presently a moratorium is in place on all slips, but will most likely end before the application is Tully processed. B. Al Krupski mentioned that dredging is needed. Pat Moore indicated that maintenance permits with DEC and the Town are current and coordinated. C. Authorities prefer a rip -rap wall to a bulkhead design. The rip -rap would start at the high water line and extend inland approximately 10-15 feet. A retaining wall Inland of the rip -rap would be allowable to support land elevations needed. A conservative approach would use the most landward construction for setbacks when applying for a variance with the zoning board. The rip - rap wall is preferred by DEC as it helps dissipate energy from wave action. D. The Town would have no objection for the use of the end of Shipyard Lane for transitions needed for the rip -rap. E. A site meeting with the trustees, planning board and DEC was suggested for August 12, 2003, time to be determined. FRGVi : $i. ::u IQ a/b FRf NC. :212 677 '898or,07 2003 01:07PM P3 do F. Phragmites were identified on she and wetlands are currently being flagged on the site by Jeff Seeman of Coastal Environmental. Ii. Fire and Emergency Issues' A. East Marion Fire District had the following issues with the plan: 1. Right-of-way access for fire and rescue apparatus to within 100 feet of individual residences was requested. An on -grade alternative for access needs to be considered. 2, Improvements to the existing water supply to supply pressurized water service sufficient to support firefighting requirements is needed. 3. Vehicle access to the beach area Is desired in case of emergency. B, Architects noted that 300 feet was allowed if the buildings incorporated sprinklers. Town asked for a chart showing allowable and proposed actions based on NYS codes. The length of ambulatory rescue was also a consideration for the 100 -foot request. C. The design of the 20' fire lane may be made of alternative materials 0 they are capable of supporting applicable vehicle and emergency apparatus weights. D. The 0" water main may not have the capacity to supply fire suppression systems, Access to pond and aea waters may be used for fire -fighting. Water storage fooftes are another consideration. E. Town was pleased with the intent to have the ponds supplied by wells and circulation pumps so that a reliable water supply would be available for pumping in times of drought. Ili. Parking A. ADA parking must be shown on the plan. Accessible parking spots should also be located on the northern edge In close proximity to accessible units. B. The parking should be analyzed as to State code requirements, zoning requirements and proposed spaces. Land banking for future parking spaces may be used to avoid over -building the parking area. C It is recognized that details relating to internal space allocation are not yet designed. D. Uses that overlap occupancies may be identified for arguments advocating lower numbers of parking spaces. E. Parking for the single residence should be labeled. F. Alternative paving may be used for the parking lots. IV. Site Considerations A. Public water and a community sanitary system will be used. B, The man-made ponds will have slopes gentle enough to avoid classification as swimming pools (zoning definition). Man-made ponds are to be considered non Jurisdictional for the Trustees. C. Decks and tennis courts need to be figured as !ot coverage items, D. Either flood -proofing or raising floors and mechanical equipment above the flood plain will be needed. The Town prefers raising the structure. This will require major. If not total demolition work to the concrete building. E. Number of units and lot coverage are significantly below the allowable build -out. F. Multiple residences are not permitted on the site. The use shall be for transient purposes. G. Due to the site's past history as an oyster manufacturing plant. Environmental tests will be needed. These will be conducted by both Town representatives and Coastal Environmental. A phase 1 SEQRA review is needed. H. Town welcomed the proposal as it represents an Improvement to this disturbed site. I. Town requires the survey to use 1929 data relative to contours (which was used on submitted survey). PPGtti :stuc:o d%b FAI, N0. :212 677 -090 �9. 07 2003 01:00PM P4 V. Process and 3chaduie A. Pat Moore will submit tc me Zcning Board for a special exception for motel and restaurant uses, fance for the tennis cour!, setbacks from bulkheads, and waterfront decking. B. The planning board will want to sea a site lighting plan and fixture type cuts, as well as landscape schedule, building elevations, roof pitches and signage. C. The footprints should be as accurate as possible. Changes should be within the proposed footprints to avoid repeating the Zoning Board Appeal process and Planning Review. D. 1300 sf maximum unit size represents interior space only, not including structure or decks (zoning). The Health Department may have additional requirements if the unit size exceeds 400 af. E. Units that wid be handicap accessible should be identified in the plans F. A disapproval will be issued so that a variance may be submitted for approval. VI. Health Department Public water main upgrade may be required. Sanitary system decisions must be made very soon. Alternative should be considered and cost of each discussed. Application to the Health Department should be made ASAP. Number of units allowed will depend on the sanitary system selected and public water availability Enclosures: Sign4n sheet Cc: Attendees Fib: MinutesO30724Tuwn 81712003 11:48 AM Minutes by: G. Berry 2 hrs 7124103 FFOM :studio aib l" 46 FF7; NO. •212 677 7898 %/ o 3 Pilo -rdst- K / �9�� vti c s �J ear ,.T Af d .� r6fj �« 0a. 07 2003 01:08PM P5 /4 — l.;?ooA JmE5 4GifT('� TcousuG weeId04J l7e-140-- 1,27- z0dv 41Z 477- 7XIT 2fZ 617- ZVEI 6J! 76b 1y 60 Cadta 140%, Cib1///'PA&iM &&I-raS3-33 G 3/-'71.5~ y33 0 (;�-61- ase 77.Z;2, �G30), x —ldeZ 0 1X '" .3 MEMBERS Ar 6 i T ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR MEMORANDUM 6 ri PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: July 31, 2003 To: James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer ; ` From: Bruno Semon. Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Preliminary Site Plan Approval and Review for Oki -Do. 2835 Shipyard Lane EastMarion, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Zoned MII Status: Active Site Plan proposed being processed. P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of the site. Please review for comments, concerns and approval. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Young & Young , dated 05/05/03 and received by the Planning Board 06/25/03. YOUNG & YOUNG Telephone 631-727-2303 400 Ostrander Avenue Facsimile 631-727-0144 Riverhead New York 11901 admin(Pyoungengineering.com HOWARD W. YOUNG, Land Surveyor THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Professional Engineer ROBERT C. TAST, Architect RONALD E. PFUHL, Landscape Architect July 28, 2003 ATTN: Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold 53095 State Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: OKI -DO at East Marion, T/0 Southold, New York (99-0733) Dear Mr. Semon: Enclosed are two (2) sets of the Site Plan & Details (Sheets 1-3) dated May 5, 2003, as per your request. Very truly yours, Robert C. Tast, AIA RCTmal Encl. 2 Q 3 ILIJII/ Sr."hold Town -.I:.,'iP,�d Planning Engineering Land Surveying Architecture Bruno Semon Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Semon: NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CONSULTING CHARLES J. VOORHIS, CEP. AICP • ARTHUR J. KOERBER, P.E. • VICTOR BERT, P.E. JOSEPH R. EPIFANIA, P.E. • ROBERT G. NELSON, JR., P.E. PAUL M. RACZ, PLS. • THOMAS F. LEMBO, P.E. July 28, 2003 Re: Town of Southold, SEQRA Review Ola D3 Site Plan 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM #1000-38-07-7.1 Thank you for contacting NP&V for services in connection with SEQR review and the implementation of the above referenced project. The following services and fees are proposed: 1. Inspect property and area to determine environmental resources and characteristics, 2. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form. 3. Review Part II Environmental Assessment Form. 4. Prepare detailed environmental planning letter report of the subject application. Fee: $850.00 5. Prepare recommended determination of significance (if requested by Board). Fee: Time Rates Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feel free to call shouid you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, & VooRHis, LLC J. Morhis. CEP. AICP Gdms/Proposal/2003env/semon 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD. MELVILLE, NY 11747-2188 (631) 427-5665 FAX (631) 427-5620 W W W.NELSONPOPE.COM 4 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR. July 29, 2003 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Ll o�o��SUFFOC�-Co� N at y !* o�ol # PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Proposed Site Plan for Oki -Do 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Mrs. Moore, Enclosed you will find an estimate for environmental services from NPV. Please submit the amount of $ 850.00 endorsed to the Town of Southold. P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 For your information a site visit is being scheduled for August 12, 2003 at 8:30-9:30am by the Town Trustee's thru Mr. Jeff Seeman of Coastal Environmental Corporation. Please inform anybody you feel should attend and have them contact us. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Site Plan Reviewer CC:file Enc. l U JUL-G-f-GGUJ Ze-4Fl IYOL]Uly, r ur r . LLr Bruno Semon Town of Southold . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr, Semon: 0) NELSONP'POPE & VOOPH185 LLC ENVIRONMENTAL - PLANNING CONSULTING NAR1E2J, VOONNIa, OEP.A iw . APTHUR J. KOERa29. RE ,NC1IXi BERT, PE. JOSEPH K EPIFANIA, P.E. •ROBERT 0. NHEON,JP., P.E. PAUL M. 9002, PLB.• THOMAS P LEb80. Pt July 28, 2003 Re: Town of Southold, SEQRA Review Oki -Do Site Plan 2535 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM #1000-38-07-7.1 Thank you for contacting NP&V for services in connection with SEQR review and the implementation of the above referenced project.. The following services and fees are proposed: 1. Inspect property and area to determine environmental resources and characteristics, 2. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form, 3. Review Part II Environmental Assessment Form. 4. Prepare detailed environmental planning letter report of the subject application. Fee: $850,00 5. Prepare recommended determination of significance (if requested by Board). Fee: Time Rates Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feel free to call should you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, MELS POPE & VooRmis, LLC 6arles J. V This, CEP, AICD O:doas/Propwak3003envAem 876 WALT WM17MAN AMA0, MELVILL6. NV 11747-2189 t631) A27-6965 PAX (031) 427-5820 WWW,NeLSONPOPE.CCM TOTAL P.02 • 9 WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Amended July 28, X003 at 4:30 pm East Enders, Inc./ Michael Serbes Office. \ 11160 Main Road Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-122.-3-9 Zoned B RE: 1) New submittal and request for a work se and will no longer seek a deli site plan approval. Warrex Terminals, Inc. 9945 Main Road Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-142.-1-27 Zoned on 7/23/03, Change to an office use RE: 1) New site plan dated June 1, 2003 changing the curb kuts. Removed one curb cut. Silver Nail Vineyards, LLC. 46005 Main Road Southold, N.Y. SCTM: 1000-75-2-15.1 Representation: Ural Talgat RE: 1) Letter from NYS comments or concerns? Zone: AC dated July 17, 2003. Genejal discussion on any issues Petrolino & Graseck 435 North Bayville Road t & 1580 Cedar rive Southold, NY 11971 SCTM# 1000-78-8-16.2 & 1 .2 Zone: R-40 Representative: Thomas McCarthy RE: 1) New application for a to� Miscellaneous Oki -Do Representative = Pat Moore, PB discussed letter from NPV dated July 28, 2003 for fee of $850.00, Ok to proceed and send letter to applicant with copy of estimate. Mattituck Park District VS-Lettet concerned individuals. PB agreed BO would call applicant bs 7/29/03 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR MEMORANDUM 0 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: July 28, 2003 To: Planning Board Members From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Review Re: Site Visit for Oki -Do in East Marion P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 In reference to the above, a tentative site visit was set up for August 12, 2003 at 8:30am-9:30am by the Town Trustee's. The applicant's consultant will be at the site and possibly the NYSDEC. Please let me know if you would like to visit this site? Thank you in advance. Cc: file, A JUL-27-2003 2235 NELBOId, POPE, LLP z 1 516 425 1257 P.01i02 !NELSON PC)p�6 VC1fY�NIS, LLC eN F.CNNIHVYFlL . pj.q ING • CONSUL77NG 572 W► T WHI fWN Roo NfpLVLLE. IW 1 1747 . 2100 4211 427-5665 PA% (e3t) 477.5820 n Snelea-iQOPNO rn FAX COVER SHEET To: Bruno Sernon Phone: Fax: ?65-3136 From: Chic Voorhis Date: July 28, 2403 Re: Oki -Do Site Plan No. of Pages: 2 (including Cover) Bruno, Attached, please find a proposal for the above referenced site plan. Please review this and call to discuss. Chic 2 8 2003 Planning Board .JUL-27-2003 22:40 NELSON,POFE,LLP Bruno Semon Town of Southold . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr, Semon: 516 425 '_257 P.02i02 0 NELSON, POPE & VOdRHIEs LLC ENV1P0NMEN7A6 - PIANNIN2 CONSULTINI3 CI1,MLU J. VQQR 119. CGP. M1 -AR1+NF J. KOt3126R, P.E.MCMR BERT, PE. JOSEIX , ., BOa6sr OPL PAUL M. PUM, PLO. • TMOIMS F. LEM0. RE July 28, 2003 Re: Town of Southold, SEQRA Review Oki -Do Site Plan 2835 Shipyard Lane, Hast Marion SC TM #1000-38-07-7.1 Thank you for contacting NYP&V for services in connection with SEQR review and the implementation of the above referenced project. . The following services and fees are proposed: 1- Inspect property and area to determine environmental resources and characteristics, 2. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form. 3. Review Part II Environmental Assessment Form. 4. Prepare detailed environmental planning letter report of the subject application. Fee: $850.00 5. Prepare recommended determination of significance (if requested by Board). Fee: Time Rates Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feel free to call should you have any questions. 0;docs/Propos&V2603enws: Respectfully submitted. & VooRtils, LLC J. VArhis, CEP, AICD 672 WAL- WMITMAN MCAD, MELVILLE. NY 11747-21195 1631) 427-E6ET PAX (821) 427-5620 WW W.NeLCONPOPE.CCM TOTAL P.e2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR MEMORANDUM Date: July 24, 2003 StEF01/r040 o� �� N x i PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town Trustees From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Preliminary Site Plan Approval and Review for Oki -Do. 2835 Shipyard Lane EastMarion, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Zoned MII Status: Active Site Plan proposed being processed. P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax(631)765-3136 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of the site. Please review for comments and concerns. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Young & Young , dated 05/05/03 and received by the Planning Board 06/25/03. July 17, 2003 96/66 EA T MARION FIRE DISTACT �5 Board of Fire Commissioners PPJ PO Box 131 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939 (631) 477-0163 Fax (631) 477-8310 Email: EMFDistrict@optonline.net Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: OKI -DO, LTD project M Southold Town Ptannin Board Thank you for attending our meeting on July 14`h. After reviewing the proposed plans for development of the property the Board has several concerns that should be addressed. 1) Right of way access for fire and rescue apparatus throughout the project. Specifically the ability to respond to within 100' of individual residences. 2) Improvements to the existing water supply to supply pressurized water service sufficient to support firefighting requirements. 3) Vehicle access to the beach area. Please convey our concerns to the owner of the project. We will be happy to discuss any questions or concerns with them. Veryt��Cf Donald Dzenkowski Chairman Board of Fire Commissioners 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR July 22, 2003 Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC. 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747-2188 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Proposed Site Plan for Oki -Do 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Gentleman, P.O. Box 1179_— Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 We are in receipt of a new project as described above. Attached is a site plan copy dated May 5, 2003 and prepared by Young & Young. Included is a copy of the EAF Long Form submitted with the application. Please review the site plan and provide the Town of Southold Planning Board with an estimate of Environmental services. For your information the site plan is at a preliminary point. It will require various County, State and Town approvals before the final hearing. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Res ctfu yours, o e on enior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file,vs,PB Enc.: site plan and EAF o w M PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Proposed Site Plan for Oki -Do 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Gentleman, P.O. Box 1179_— Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 We are in receipt of a new project as described above. Attached is a site plan copy dated May 5, 2003 and prepared by Young & Young. Included is a copy of the EAF Long Form submitted with the application. Please review the site plan and provide the Town of Southold Planning Board with an estimate of Environmental services. For your information the site plan is at a preliminary point. It will require various County, State and Town approvals before the final hearing. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Res ctfu yours, o e on enior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file,vs,PB Enc.: site plan and EAF c0/y OKI -DO LTD. Holistic Health Institute At Cleaves Point East Marion, Town of Southold Hotel Restaurant -Health Center Full Environmental Assessment Form Prepared By: Coastal Environmental Corporation 42 Lewis Road East Quogue, New York 11942 Jeffrey L. Seeman, CEP REM Tel. 631-653-3399 E-mail jlscoast@optonline.net t� f. r r jDann + �, Pond a° OR i b li Ne1`9' • p SNI - y � � l = L •dict � 21 j Mai Ion-% _ �i IoM a: GARD FAT Esst Mar on s`5rv�j MaYinaa , :� 0.R F E t 11 D .• 7 SITE- �aR LOCAnom �y $urhnH a � Cum ii2{lI Cleaves Pt ! \ b J.'a?iifity Stea NO - r A :I• � � 11 Aq asn n a Pt dy Bim•^' �fourres Pk y T,awA., Nati � � �. R �1 LIS?,{ (- It� , �• 7; � ') ��r';_" ',S►h. - • - •' Cornelius - / PS 4 � ( ;t Q • � �A I i r;r I �yp'J'. tl t,rghtS w! tlflgP •� -ry A '. esolYne pE a Tower A� Golf to it ng lHarbor Pt 3-D TopoQuatls Copyright ®1999 DeLonae Yarmoulk ME 040% Source Data: DSGS i 900p Seale: 1: 22,400 Detail: 13-2 Datum: WGS84 0 PART 1 --PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor 41 NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action OKI -DO LTD. Holistic Health Institute Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) SCTM # 1000-38-07-7.1 east side of Shipyard Lane, north of Gardiners Bay near Cleaves Point, Fast Marion,(Southold) Suffolk Count, New York Name of Applicant/Sponsor Dr. Kazuko Hillyer Address 1 Lincoln Plaza -Apt. 24E City/ PO New York City Business Telephone Name of Owner (if different) Address City / PO Business Telephone Description of Action: State NY Zip Code 10023 State Zip Code Holistic health center consisting of 125 units of transient hotel/motel (100 unitssemi- detached and 25 in one building) for lodging, 171 parking spaces, 200 seat restaurant, ornamental ponds, office space, perforance stage, swimming pool, tennis court, gathering hall, maintenance building, 1 -single family dwelling (manager's house), hot baths, ornamental gardens and dredgedboat basin. Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question --Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial 0 Commercial ❑ Residential (suburban) ❑ Rural (non-farm) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture 0 Other former ouster comnarrY/commercial fish 2. Total acreage of project area: 18.7115 acres, APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) +/- 14.71 acres 0 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) +/-0.5 acres +1-0.5 acres Water Surface Area +/- 1.0 acres +/-1.0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or Fill) 1.5 acres 1.5 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces +/- 1 acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ❑ Well drained _% of site Q Moderately well drained 100 % of site. ®Poorly drained _% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? NA acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑ Yes rEl No a. What is depth to bedrock + - 800 (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: r7110-1 0% 95% ®t0- 15% 5 % ® 15% or greater _% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes ❑m No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ❑. No 8. What is the depth of the water table? 0-10 ft. (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 0Yes ❑ No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? O Yes ❑ No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species f plant or animal life that is identified as threat or endangered? MYes F No According to: Site Inspection: J. Seeman, CEP Coastal Environmental Corp. Jun. 19, 2003- may have potential for piping plover none sighted. 12. Are there any unique or unusual Eyes ® No Describe: on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neignDomood as an open space or recreation area r Q Yes rMlNo If ves. explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? 15. li[t11111111 ---"___.._'------- vistas seaward of site to Gardiners Bay and Shelter Island, the site itseldf is abandoned buildings Streams within or contiguous to project area: none a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary LaKes, pones, weuana areas wnnm u cwayuuus w Proleu died: tidal wetalnds-littoral zone along beachfront coastal shore of Gardiners Bay b. Size (in acres): +1-0.5 Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? R Yes No • a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? M Yes D No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? F1Yes ONo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 -AA, Section 303 and 304? nYes rolNo 19. Is the site located in or substantialcontiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ®Yes Hi No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑ Yes ❑a No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 18.7115 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 18.7115 acres initially; 16.7115 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 2 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. NA % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 171 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 12 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately 1 1. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 35 max height; 120 width; 192 ft. length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? +/-927 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 1000 tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed RlYes ®No EIN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? hotel/motel/restauranVholistic health center b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? FolYes ® No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Fol Yes r] No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 15.7115 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally -important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑ Yes O No 6. if single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 18 months, (including demolition) 7. If mufti -phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑ Yes M No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 45 ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑ Yes no No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑ Yes no No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? F Yes ❑ No Type sanitary wastewater 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes F1No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? IF] Yes ❑ No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? O Yes ❑ No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? 0.4 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility he used? no Yes ❑ No c. If yes, give name private carter ; location unknown d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? FYes ❑ No Page 6 of 21 e.. If yes, explain: recyclables-paper, metals, plastics, etc. 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ayes ❑No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 0.4 tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? unk years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [Dyes a No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? 0Yes no 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ®Yes a No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? IF Yes ® No If yes, indicate type(s) power, 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallonstminute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 18.000 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? © Yes a No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 r! 25. Approvals Requkred: City, Town, Village Board rMlyes ®No City, Town, Village Planning Board aYes ❑ No is Type site plan special permit wetlands site plan special use permit City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ❑ No City, County Health Department El Yes No sanitary water supply Other Local Agencies M Yes M No Other Regional Agencies © Yes ® No State Agencies Yes ® No NYSDEC tidal wetlands Federal Agencies Yes ®No USACOE wetlands/dredging Submittal Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? r§jYes ® No If Yes, indicate decision required: ® Zoning amendment n Zoning variance ® New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision ❑d Site plan rol Special use permit ® Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 i 0. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or wateraistricts? rl Yes a No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? o Yes 1:1 No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Fal Yes ri No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ® Yes ❑M No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. rMlyes ® No D. Informational Detaits Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ApplicanUS onsor Name /'r9 tri L _ . Signat Title �,e�2T If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR July 22, 2003 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Proposed Site Plan for Oki -Do 2835 Shipyard Lane, East Marion SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Dear Mrs. Moore, This letter is to inform you about details on the above-mentioned project. P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 We are looking forward to meeting July 24, 2003 at 10:00am and discussing this project. We are in receipt of the site plan application fee of $10,220.60 and will start the processing of this project application. Attached are two receipts for the payment. The fee accepted is based on the site plan prepared May 5, 2003 by Young and Young. The amount paid was calculated from the site plan data and utilized 18.7115 acres and a proposed building area of 91,783 sq.ft.. If the proposed building area square foot increases additional amounts will be due to the Town of Southold for this site plan application. We are currently sending the application to Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC for review and will forward the cost estimate when received. Enclosed is the response from the East Marion Fire Department dated 7/14/03. The letter has three (3) comments, please review the comments and inform the Planning Board (PB) on how they can be addressed. During a preliminary review the following will be needed to process the site plan application: 1. Review from the Town of Southold Building Department; please submit a permit application and associated fee for disapproval as needed. 2. Review from the Town of Southold Trustee's and permit approval as needed. 3. Review from the Town of Southold Z.B.A as needed. A special exception variance will be required. 4. Review from the N.Y.S. D.E.C. and permit approval as needed. 5. Review from the S.C.H.D. and permit approval as needed. 6. Review from the S.C.W.A. and permit approval as needed. 7. Review from A.R.C. of proposed buildings. 0 i July 22, 2003 Page Two Continued Proposed Site Plan for Oki -Do 8. The Town of Southold records indicate the current owner of the parcel is Oki -Do, Ltd. The application documents submitted with the site plan application does not have a corporate/company seal and must indicate the authorized officers position title where endorsed. Please fix the documents and resubmit to the PB. 9. Submit construction drawings with elevations and floor layout plans of each proposed structure and use. Please indicate which of the above listed approvals have bee initiated. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Re e fully ours, B Sem Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file, Building Department enc, receipts, letter. Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 40 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 07/16/03 Receipt#: Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $5,400.00 Check#: 1718 Total Paid: $5,400.00 Name: Oki -do, Ltd Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY 11939 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Internal ID: 79370 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ***RECEIPT*** Date: 07/16/03 Receipt#: Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $4,820.60 Cash#: 1545 Total Paid: $4,820.60 Name: Oki -do, Ltd Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY 11939 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Internal ID: 79372 1141' MARION FIRE DISTWCT Board of Fire Commissioners PO Box 131 Main Road • East Marion, NY 11939 (631) 477-0163 - Fax (631) 477-8310 Email: EMFDistrict@optonline.net July 17, 2003 Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: OKI -DO, LTD project Thank you for attending our meeting on July 14`x'. After reviewing the proposed plans for development of the property the Board has several concerns that should be addressed. 1) Right of way access for fire and rescue apparatus throughout the project. Specifically the ability to respond to within 100' of individual residences. 2) Improvements to the existing water supply to supply pressurized water service sufficient to support firefighting requirements. 3) Vehicle access to the beach area. Please convey our concerns to the owner of the project. We will be happy to discuss any questions or concerns with them. Very,. 1 y�Cf Donald Dzenkowskt Chairman Board of Fire Commissioners • • WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD July 21,,2003 at 4130 pm Mike Verity, Principle Building Inspector RE: 1) Discussion of proposed code Oki -Do. s / �r — 2835 Shipyard Lane EastMarion, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Zoned MII RE: 1) Staff memo about 7/24/03 meeting and comments or concerns. Chris Mohr CR 48 Cutchogue, NY SCTM#11OC RE: 1) New landscape plan received 7/8/ 3 on Cross Sound Ferry • Orient, NY RE: 1) Letter received from NYSDOT. Mullen Motors Main Road Southold, NY SCTM 1000- 62.-3-20 RE: 1) New concept site plan received. Cutchogue Harbor Marine 3350 West Creek Avenue Cutchogue, NY SCTM# 100 -110-1-1 RE: 1) New activity on this site plan, 7/14/03 S oke w/ Angelson Middle Road (CR48/North Road Peconic SCTM# 1000-73-6-001, 002 RE: 1) New application on a lot line. • Miscellaneous American Legion Post 1045 RE: Liquor License Renewal, Fis r Island bs 7/22/03 Zoned LI plan. Zone: B, HB, R-40 Zoned MI Ludlam about site plan. Albert J. Krupski, President Jamps Kink, Vice -President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda _Waiver/ iReceived App OF room rwTs,rrus WN OF SOUTH01.1) Office Use Only Erosion Permit Application I Permit Application -`- Major _SEQRA Classification: Type I_._ Type II_Unlisted Coordination: (date sent) _ ,/6AC Referral ,/ Sent_ 6�a atef'Inspection: _Receipt of CAC Report: -_Lead Agency Determination: _Technical Review:_ _Public Heat irgt Held:_ $ p16 113 Resolution: • rown Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 'Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Pax(631)765-1366 Name of Applicant Address[._'i << % _.�7/n z, 4 Y•j__ d / IC, ) Z --Phone Number Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - Property Location:_ Y3J_ (provide LILCO Pole ##, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: ra;Ytcrc_�-- (If applicable) Address: 5-I.V Z _Phone: lip Bcard of Trnstees Applicatioz, GENERAL DATA Land Area (in Fquare feet):_ -----A �'/ A zf Area Zoning:.__. _ Previous use ol'property: Intended use of property: 71-11) , Prior permits/approvals f6r site improvements: Agency Date No prior permitslapprovals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary):_ leer '2 y e- *f 7 7 V'r lei 'k . 11 Owner: OKI -Do Ltd. Property: 2835 Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED PURPOSE- (I)Demolish and remove wood Building at north side of property( slabs to remain) (2)Main Concrete Building - windows and doors will be board up Interior of building will be cleaned out and dilapidated partitions removed- building remains (3) Large Tin Building at South end of property: clean up debris inside and outside demolish generator building on westside Demolish and remove partitions and concrete vaults inside bldg. Keep foundation walls, piers and concrete slabs h�rF�fer-fitrFFre-ese P f'IYiU�. Rwaewe®Eeehbeams, tin root and siding Peta,r Ve✓+trC'.Q J- LJ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR MEMORANDUM 46 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: July 16, 2003 To: Planning Board and Val Scopaz From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Site Plan for Oki -Do. 2835 Shipyard Lane EastMarion, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Zoned MII P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax(631)765-3136 Status: Active site plan application received 7/16/03 and being processed. For your information we have a scheduled meeting on 7/24/03 at 10:00am with the applicant, Building Department and have invited Highways, Trustees, ZBA and the Town Engineer. I will bring this to the work session on July 21, 2003 for any comments and concerns of this project. This site plan is for site build out as follows;new 25 unit hotel with 21,319 sq.ft., 100 units of a motel with 36,000 sq.ft., restaurant with 10,800 sq.ft., pump house with 283 sq.ft., managers house with 1,200 sq.ft., pyramid house with 576 sq.ft., maintenance bldg. with 3,125 sq.ft., hall bldg. with 8,245 sq.ft., two office bldgs. With 960 sq.ft., showers with 450 sq.ft., and tennis court with 8,825 sq.ft. on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone(s) located at the south east end of Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM#(s) 1000-38-7-7.1 If you have any questions please let me know. Thank you in advance. Cc: file 6 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR. MEMORANDUM Date: July 16, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Preliminary Site Plan Certification for Oki -Do. 2835 Shipyard Lane EastMarion, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-38.-7-7.1 Zoned MII Status: Active site plan application received 7/16/03 and being processed. P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 For your information the applicant confirmed our meeting for 7/24/03 at 10:00am. Please review before the meeting if possible. I have some zoning questions as well which we can discuss when you have time. In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and preliminary certification. This site plan is for site buildout as follows;new 25 unit hotel with 21,319 sci t., 100 units of a motel with 36,000 sq.ft., restaurant with 10,800 sq.ft., pump house with 283 sq.ft., managers house with 1,200 sq.ft., pyramid house with 576 sq.ft., maintenance bldg. with 3,125 sq.ft., hall bldg. with 8,245 sq.ft., two office bldgs. With 960 sq.ft., showers with 450 sq.ft., and tennis court with 8,825 sci t. on 18.7115 acres parcel in the MII Zone(s) located at the south east end of Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM#(s) 1000-38-7-7.1 Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Young & Young, dated 05/05/03 and received by the Planning Board 06/25/03. 4 July 7, 2003 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 (BY HAND) Re: Oki -Do LTD Dear Bruno: Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Enclosed please find my client's check in the amount of $4,820.60 which represents the balance due for site plan fee. I believe that the file is ready for your review. However if you need anything further please do not hesitate to contact me. Very t ours, 6atricia C. Moore 0 • WORK SESSION AGENDA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD June 30, 2003 at 4:30 Pm SITE PLANS North Fork Food (Former Johnny's Restaurant) 43715 CR 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-59-3-30 Zone: LB Representation: Ms. Nancy Steelman, Owner (Mr. Patrick Mettes) RE: 1) New proposed site plan concept. Letter from Building Department. Mattituck Self Storage 885 Wickham Avenue Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM: 1000-140-2-9 Zone: LI RE: 1) Revised site plan. Oki -Do, Ltd. 2835 Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY SCTM: 1000-38.-7-7.1 Zone: MH Representation: Patricia Moore, esq._ 9� / / A) � � 2 T aGC RE: 1) New site plan application. MAJOR AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES., SET OFF APPLICATIONS Rapp, Forchelli, Gilbert Lot Line 355 Lake Drive Southold, NY SCTM: 1000-80.-3-15 Zone: R-40 RE: 1) New proposed lot lines ( see attached maps) bs 7/3/03 C� PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 June 24, 2003 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: OKI -DO LTD. Premises: near Cleaves Point, East Marion, New York SCTM # 1000-38-07-7.1 Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Enclosed please find the following for the above referenced matter: 1. Application for Consideration of a Site Plan 2. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans 3. Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form 4. Applicant's Affidavit 5. FEAF 6. Site Plan Prints 7. Check in the sum of $5,400.00 payable to "Town of Southold" If you need anything else, please do not hesitate to contact RAN Very t�,Zly�yours, �L Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr Encls. � OKI-DO , LTD East Marion, NY 1000-38-7-7.1 © �- y� . a = 0 ARTICLE XII, EN(1) Marine II (Mil) District [Added 1-10-1989 by L.L. No. 1-1989] § 100-120. Purpose. The purpose of the Marine 11(Ml l) District is to provide a waterfront location for a wide range of water -dependent and water -related uses, which are those uses which require or benefit from direct access to or location in marine or tidal waters and which, in general, are located on major waterways, open bayfronts or the Long Island Sound. § 100-121. Use regulations. In the MH District, no building or premises shall be used and no building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any uses except the following [one (1) use per eighty thousand (80,000) square feet of land above mean high water, unless otherwise specified]: A. [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted uses and, except for those uses permitted under Subsection A(1) hereof, are subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: (1) One (1) one -family detached dwelling per single and separate lot of record in existence as of the date of adoption of this Article. (2) Mannas for the docking, mooring and accommodation of recreational or commercial boats, including the sale of fuel and oil primarily for the use of boats accommodated in such manna. (3) Boat docks, slips, piers or wharves for charter boats carrying passengers on excursions, pleasure or fishing trips or for vessels engaged in fishery or shellfishery. (4) Beach clubs, yacht clubs or boat clubs, including uses accessory to them, such as swimming pools, tennis courts and racquetball facilities. (5) Boatyards for building, storing, repairing, renting, selling or servicing boats, which may include the following as an accessory use: office for the sale of marine equipment or products, dockside facilities for dispensing of fuel and, where pumpout stations are provided, rest room and laundry facilities to serve overnight patrons. (6) Mariculture or aquaculture operations or research and development. (7) Boat and marine engine repair and sales and display, yacht brokers or marine insurance 0 brokers. (8) Buildings, structures and uses owned or operated by the Town of Southold, school districts, park districts and fire districts. (9) Retail sale or rental of fishing, diving or bathing supplies and equipment if accessory to a marina or boatyard or ship's loft or chandlery. B. Uses permitted by special exception by the Board of Appeals. The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the Board of Appeals, as hereinafter provided, subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: (1) Restaurants, excluding outdoor counter service, drive-ins or curb -service establishments. Such prohibition shall not prevent service at tables on a covered or uncovered terrace or porch incidental to a restaurant. (2) Ferry terminals. (3) Transient hotels or motels, subject to the following conditions: (a) The minimum area for such use shall be not less than three (3) acres. (b) The number of guest rooms permitted in the hotel or motel shall be determined by the proportion of the site utilized for such use and the availability of public water and sewer. The maximum number of guest units shall be one (1) unit per four thousand (4,000) square feet of land with public water and sewer. (4) Fish processing plants. (5) Fish markets, which may include a combination of wholesale and retail sale of finfish and shellfish. (6) Museums with a nautical theme or art galleries. C. [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Accessory uses. The following uses are permitted as accessory uses and, except for residential accessory uses and signs, which are governed by Article XX, are subject to site plan review: (1) Accessory uses as set forth in and regulated by § 100-31C(1) through (7) of the Agricultural -Conservation District, and subject to the conditions of § 100-33 thereof.EN(2) § 100-122. Bulk, area and parking regulations. No building shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the MII District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules 2 incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect if such regulations were set forth herein in full EN(3) Ir .t as r r.- w r s ak � ,n r _ 1 ♦ \ ,40 tl 473889 38.-7-7-1 OWNER OYSTER FARMJ�ASSOC NUMBER# DATE TYPE CO # USE/DESCRIPTION 4336 6/11/69 PERMIT 3594 B.P.#4336 CO#Z3 _ 12194 3/17/83 PERMIT 15656 ADD STRGE HSED - B.P.#12194 ST _ 0/00/00 _ 0/00/00 _ 0/00/00 _ 0/00/00 _ 0/00/00 _ 0/00/00 _ 0/00/00 _ 0/00/00 _ F1=More F7=Permit Detail F8=Co Detail F9=Preco F12=New Swis/Parcel F3=Exit 473889 SOUTHOLD NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY SCHOOL OYSTER PONDS SC DATE 07/16/2003 ROLL SEC TAXABLE RCLS 449 WAREHOUSE TOTAL RES SITE 38.-7-7.1 TOTAL COM SITE 2835 SHIPYARD LA ACCT NO 04 = OWNER & MAILING INFO ===I=MISC 1=====--- ------ ASSESSMENT DATA ORI-DO LTD IRS -SS I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT 20 WEST 64 STREET #24E 1 1 (LAND 20,900 **TAXABLE** NEW YORK NY 10023 1 BANK (TOTAL 40,800 COUNTY 40,800 **PRIOR** TOWN 40,800 ILAND 20,900 SCHOOL 40,800 ITOTAL 40,800 ==DIMENSIONS ========_= SALES INFORMATION =--------------------------------- ACRES 17.75 IBOOK 11954 SALE DATE 03/15/99 SALE PRICE 1,100,000 IPAGE 55 PR OWNER AQUAFOOD PROPERTIES LTD ------=TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 =------------1== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IFDO26 IPK065 IWWO20 ISWO11 F1=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=G0 TO INVENTORY F9=G0 TO XREF F10=G0 TO MENU SENT BY: MOORE; 631 765 4643; JUN -14-e)2 15:46; PAGE 2/2 /* /"6, 'n RECEIVED Sli PATRICIA C. MOORE T a Attorney at Law �f JUN 1 4 20 51020 Main Road Southold, Newyork 11971 Southold Town CIO - Tel! (631) 765-4330 Fax; (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary June 14, 2002 Elizabeth Neville, Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 17.971 Town Clerk Re: Chapter 90 proceeding 2835 Shipyard Lane Dear Mrs. Neville: Please be advised that my client, OKIDO LTD. is attempting to comply with your order, however, we have been advised by the building department that they can not issue a demclition permit and fence permit without DEC and Trustees approval. Please adjourn the hearing in order to give us the time to obtain both Trustees and DEC permit to locate a fence and demolish in accordance with our permit. Thank you for your courtesies. Very truly yours, /i — YHtricia C. Moore �,, DOM SENT BY: MOORE; RKEIVED Q61oln " 4 2002 Southold Town Clerl.. to631 765 4643; JuN-14-02 15:45; PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Mail) Road Southold, New Yurk 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET PAGE 1/2 The pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from Patricia C. Moore. This information is intended solely for use by the individual entity named as the recipient hereof. If you are not. the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of thi6 transmission is prohibited- It you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange to retrieve this transmission at no cost to you. RF. DATE: TOTAL NUMBER O.i' PACES INCLUDING COVER SHEET (S� _ IF TRANSMISSION IS FAULTY OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CALM, RACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. CLIENT NAME: OPERATOR: Memo to file SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.001 From: Valerie Scopaz Date: August 16, 1994 I met with Mr. Seaholm Jr. on Friday morning, August 12, to discuss this property. He wanted to know if the Planning Board had any specific uses in mind for this property; also if there was any interest in allowing this property to be rezoned to permit subdivision of the land into residential lots. While an R zone would be compatible with surrounding land uses, the Planning Board feels the property owners should utilize its Marine zoning. There are very few developable sites in this zone. I relayed this information to Mr. Seaholm by phone this morning. He will keep the Board posted as to what his clients decide to do. 1 O Carl G. Seaholm Jr. Licensed Real Estate Broker Mr.Richard G. Ward Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 OLM ENT ERPRISEA 0-2-3/6p Thursday, August 2, 1994 RE: BUILDINGS AND 18.7 ACRE± PROPERTY LOCATED INSTATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, REGION 1000, SECTION 038, BLOCK 7, LOT 7.001.; OWNER: AQUAFOODS INC. Dear Mr Ward I was recently hired (on an exclusive basis) by the Owner to sell the above referenced property and to handle communications related to it as a spokesperson. The Owner consists of a rather diverse group of investors who naturally want to get the best possible price on sale of the property, but who also do not want to expend needless time, effort, and expense pursuing a sale for a use or uses which are not approvable. As you no doubt are aware, the property's M -II designation, while allowing a number of uses, leaves the most logically needed uses clouded in the uncertainty of the special exception process, and severely restricts the otherwise natural potential for utilizing the property for residential purposes. I have spent many hours reviewing the fully updated Southold Zoning Code to become conversant with the township's requirements. I am also aware of the potential for sweeping changes that the current Stewardship Study could eventually bring. I would like to have the chance to meet with you and discuss the property in the context of all of the above. I believe that I will have a much better chance of fulfilling my fiduciary obligations to the owners of the property, and of minimizing the potential of eventual disagreements with the Township if I get some insight into the Town's perspective and possibly it's vision of the most desirable use or uses which are currently economically practical. I expect to launch a rather costly and time consuming advertising campaign within the next two to three weeks to locate the best potential purchaser for the property. I would take it as a great favor if we can meet before this campaign is fully launched. I can currently be reached at (516) 692-3160 or at the above address. /LLrr>L o>/- Tueo . Yours Sincerely, Li /% - / Q- 44 0ma �& • �O"� , Carl G. Seaholm Jr. Fly - �,,u✓ /'tic {fiK — oSueV-yLE Pb kK- / t!5 VL, REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE %r Date: .21710 S C%,/f%1� Name: �L4� (c« C I�o� - �/ 'A� �J Telephone: Mailing Address: S7 D zo 1Tla m SCTM# of site you are inquiring about: Query: (Please be specific about the information you need. Provide supporting documentation - surveys, maps, sketches - where possible.) ,::f7 r c � v^e-a--e ;�- t- aun < . D66A /00 a -- 3�s- 07 7, J 2 -7c)* v� 7 S- 4 hs" (C-6 t- a�xcou� For Office Use Only. Routed to: /J Ja 9 0 a 0 z 0 CL a w J 0 GILLETTE DRIVE ( I I I � 850.63 OWE At per` r-- WTfL ON - �� .s, A �� ate- '' .Y • i � � \V o � --- - IT 7-44*' 99, W � �C% F:: e•1 Ta-ro,L., N uM 9 h@T tl uN i'CIa 41 X- iz 940 bi•) '`' \ . ?'y .yaY n^,. ten. _.. ., -. - n \. 4 I'1.6?c: '• �i D 915 � ,•- �, i -17 -_ - -- i -!� „h .• � . ' , .~1 ,... ^•-" .Ian .spew I i j.. jJ , ,, I �:. , i' .'�"�.n. b � • � _ � _ �f ( �'?� `._.� �, _., _ • �� 3 'r736�8'iY'W 'N39'30'S0'Wx'44`✓ .y �j 1, y�r�. iZv Ursl"t'w "'' i � � - r% � : 7 nn �•b,.N I jr. -1, �, r .y � '� ' fr�.N i .�C1��1'`(N .T' I 1 � I% I ID G A � �� _..��. _Y - i _n,..,.. ♦ '~ „ � �eS�A by ,,; • t 1 1 y ,._" • I � •mow 17 Al— u Ls II , i r LCJI�jINIJW+" 'r„' �� 1/' I� •. _ ' F! r i � '✓✓✓///l ” g � i I� I I _1`- gg �2vl IhOPj,ywn _ _ �! l _V ti�ry/tom/�/Jr4'vrft`C1/�Vy� I♦JY I IIS'' Z N' =•A - i' •rtt~e ?" hC'r"4„ � I, 11 I II ��_� 1'VI Its 1�. (.�'•�I_ "��(1��11( I l I� ��f I I� l ��-,_S�. .V l �_ I .�.. � 4- �' r „� �r. i mmf3T ♦ y yam, N Oi • �-, ...,i � 08 Ola ✓ v T y "^,F tl" •"N3 'S1'1 W e .3 v -,g 7 d 927.89' „5. 192]. ,.. a ,,..• ,,. 11 ,z,7. ---SHIPYARD,- ,,.+LANE ,..,. ,,, 437. „3 Young & Young, Land Surveyors 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead New York 11901 516-727-2303 Alden W. Young, P.S. & L.S. (1908-f994) Howard W. Young Land urveyor Thomas C. Ao[pper" Professional Engineer John SeVur , Land Surveyor NOTE AREA -= 18.3798 ACRES (TO TIE LINE) • VERTICAL DATUM = N.G.V DATUM (M.S.L. 1929) • BENCH MARK - N.G.V.D (U S.0 G.S.) MONUMENT X325, ELEVATION 16.05 , SURVEY FOR O K I- ID O L- -r ED At East Marion, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York County Tax Map oi,e,me 1000 s..+1.. 38 ei.a 07 L.e 71 SKETCH CONCEPT SITE PLAN .175N .2e,.frl"!r . DRANNG PREPARED NOV. 20, 2002 SCALE i' = 50' SK -1 JOB NO. 2002_0604 DWG. NO. 2092_0604SK-1 RD