Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-97.-5-4.5+12 b 14"= I'-0" 5Ut=t=OLK, GO!JN"I"Y HEiiALTN l~l~'r". ~,EGIdvN At,ff,UNEE~ 9. ~ ITXF-'ANSION POOL &FL[FL LF -147 G.P.C' AI_LOP4AEYL L: l'a ) 1ENAhlTb, AS OP Tkll'c, TIi'dE %8,~-, + 1.5- 5qO L J- OF ,D'-O"¢ LEACHINO F'~.n q ,(_~q o L_P ~ .25 U'G~ ~-- S'-O"'P x IO' LH'H L. FALFtlN~Z, POOL, _Zc~ LF' RLII~', I E.xF'ANtSION P'C'OL SEPTIC TANf TC' BE d DAYS BLOP.i (58n OAI. ', .?- Il'TO/ N~RZ~ I1-~O GAL q~Fq I,. TANK LEA,Z, HiFhS POOL'S (I) 8'-0" ¢ X ?-O"H (4' O'L D.) ?" o"¢ k r-'. : 2~, so.rr./*o~, OOOI3 F-d)R 12OO ~gALLONS SU~I=OLt<. ~OUNT ,'f ~UI=I=OLi< C4:~IN'T~ I IEALTH I:~F""'I'. NO'I"E~ I. AL_L F F'.Fc AST UNITb OF TFIE t, ANll AF.Y c,'F",TEN TC' E,E hdANI/,l AC TUBRkD B'f HELL hJAI?E dO., IN¢ ,)~ AF'F'F., *'./Pr, D .,UAL .2 rHPF'.E HILL ~E NO INDUSTRIAL Pl/',c 1~ IHTO IHb-, '¢~ ~,qTI 1. 5 TI-tEF'E P41LL BE NO CONTAbdlflA~EE' ;%~,'o~EL, ?,E~UPIIE[" lO lHL F.iAINP &L U-.IT LANE J¢.AF [NL? .-~ I-,: *,k5.4~ 12P/F F, 8'¢ 12/~t. 4.9 24 CF/ET '~x-qL I ONt. ESS APPP. OVED BY 7ttE BO,,'\F£-' CIE HEAL 4. l'~ ,%FAIN CLEARAN,~S AS ~HOJ/~N ( 'N PLAN El)Il Fall',l,;, - 6. FHi. PE idlL[ BL~ NO PP..I'v',AT~ IdAI~F: 7, FiX, IFIl AIN 7' ~" F'IINIF'UIi ~NZl ANf I.INI F OF- TitF- ,Q I.A fiDliF Ok- IJNIT% TO [TI~U.z.T?ING L'N FIELD Oc~NF'ITICff'I~ q TflEPE I'-, NO ¢NJRFA6~ ~ATER ~1FilIN 2( 'O FE~'F -'F FHE F'POr*] F'] f L IN~ AND NO I OF ~Hb F'R'~¢PE~T% ~INE UNI ESc, SHOIdN ON F'I AN Lkh/I F",','E[-',-F E, ,iff, E~F,.ry4EI I_~, iF.' L.i DC.A T IO/,1 _:, '.~, :,.F.:<.I '1 t..F.>','I.O 4,l,,5~ G.F. ,_ .i- 'h)q Al / r,~5'4.2 F.F./k T.=68.~OL.F. F !?~ ~ L ,F. OF: DRAINAc.,E IOI.5 L..F. TOTA t-=--4 NP/U O~AI-'': :'J O A h'I/SAN L3 sA c. is'I hJ,ZDLqqALP G~OSC IFNC. E IO/24/OI '" FO!NN OF GOU FHHOLP, SUFPOLtt GOUNT'f, NEIAi S.C.T.H. NO. III INA rE \ PLAX J. ISAb4. SEN, .JP-'-. L.'!7I. MAI= ~pprowd sflc development plsn shall be valid for a period of three (3))'em's from ~ d~te of approval ~ p~ code ~cctbn ~.T.~, F'£ x, It II )!/ ' THE BUILDING OF THE ~TATE OF LE (Sq ORES) - uFzC,UP 'A' '~-,I ' ,TF'UC.71ONCLAE~~ 11-5 STANLEY NALON },ILL II ,'-l,I ',~ Ii '1 JAILS F'P--OPE P-, T'f AP. PA- P~4oPEF4T'F ZONE- BUILE)IN/S AREA PIRST FLOOR- hIEZZANIN~- E~,'\SEt-fE:N 1 - LOT C, OVE~AGE: f~AI~-KING AS PEF~ THE TOINN OF SE~} Th?N IOO.Iql LJ~E: F?E T/'dL I SPAGE PEF' 200 SQ. 4,000 *Q. FT / 200 = 20.5'*C6sJ [7'ELIGATESSEN (*ETAIL *TO*E): I,q45 SQ. PT. / 200 - OPFIGE AB~EA: I,q~s SO. FT / IOO - O~NEFZ'50PFIcE. I 5F'AcE PEP. U)O S, C4 FT. 880 SQ. ~T / IOO - ?).Z~ GPC, G TO FAR SPAGES ~.EQ'D ..... 58 5 TOTAL S~AC,~S ~O~iDED--- INGLIJ~aRS 5 H/C PA~iNG SPAOES' I - 15' x 45' x 14' HIGN LOADING ZONR ALL PARKIN~ 5PAOES q'xIq' ~/ ~' ~6.0 'ITC,+ NPIP FLOH LiNE HATE~ LINE GAS LINE: NEId TOP OF FEAFffE ~LEGT~IG SE~WICE 12-11 '03 droHn b!~: 1 DIANA GOl'4~ Z' I job rIO: L A'NP S6 ARE NCq E ~s ~. HITH I ,25.©t ",! q'50"E SEE DE FAIL ~, ~ I,'~-O4 z*S/ld-,ydN ; ' [, I~,, ,', ,,~ 'u I , : '::,' STANLEY AN[.' (:,T/ql E ,' .... lc ' ,w,-~,~ o5 ~':lobt~,~ .U F,..I~ ',_ ,I q:, i1~ Lin,~:,?,,, ,t, H~ U~',: xl ~~ I i ,i,,,, L IF,Hi!l!, '' ~, 4,~, .EVI: I. Nl: [ A, h4L'-:,,' AF'i~ I MAILING ADDRESS: ' PLANNING BOARD MEMBE• ~~Of S~UjyO ~ So uhOold,oNY 11971 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE h~ Chair v r ~t f OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS N ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~ ~O 54375 State Route 25 G ORGE D SOLOMON ~1~~'~~~ Ccor. Mai~R h &~Yo~unngs Ave.) Telephone: 631 76b-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 12, 2005 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Malon, Stanley (Multiuse Building) Located approximately 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane, on the n/s/o NYS Road 25 (Main Road), also known as 32845 NYS Road 25, in Cutchogue SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5 Zone: B General Business District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, April 11, 2005: The final public hearing was closed. This proposed site plan is for a new 18,112 sq. ft. commercial center on a 1.2356 acre parcel in the B Zone located approximately 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane, on the n/s/o NYS Road 25 (Main Road), also known as 32845 NYS Road 25, in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000- 97-5-4.5 WHEREAS, the applicant, Stanley Malon, proposes a new 18,112 sq. ft. commercial center on a 1.2356 acre parcel in the B Zone; and WHEREAS, Stanley Malon, is the owner of the property known as 32845 NYS Road 25 located on the n/s/o NYS Road 25 approximately 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane, in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5; and WHEREAS, the agent, Patricia C. Moore, Esq., proposes a site plan for the applicant and owner; and WHEREAS, on August 30, 2003, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on May 20,2004, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals granted a variance as described under Appeal Number 5383; and • Malon, Stanley (Multiuse Building) -Page Two - 04/12/05 WHEREAS, on October 25, 2004, the Cutchogue Fire District recommended that no fire well will be needed and the Planning Board has accepted this recommendation; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR), Part 617.6, performed a review of the unlisted action, and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on December 15, 2004, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services reviewed and approved an application under reference number C-10-02-0011; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 2005, the New York State Department of Transportation reviewed and approved the site plan under the case number 10-4-0635 and the Planning Board has accepted this approval; and WHEREAS, on February 18, 2005, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed and certified the site plan for "Commercial Center Retail and Office Space' use; and WHEREAS, on March 3, 2005, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed and approved the architectural drawings and associated site plan materials with conditions; and the Planning Board has accepted this approval; and WHEREAS, on March 22, 2005, the Southold Town Engineering Inspector reviewed and approved the proposed drainage with conditions and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, the following six items are incorporated and included in the site plan: 1. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet the Town Code requirements. 2. Prior to installation and manufacturing of signage a scaled detail must be submitted to the Planning Department for review by the Architectural Review Committee and receive Planning Board approval. 3. The agent, applicant and owner must install the traffic crossover to the western property line as shown on the site plan prepared and certified by Harold E. Gebhard a Licensed Architect, dated December 11, 2003 and last revised March 16, 2005. 4. The site plan build out must incorporate all the recommendations as detailed on the letter of the Town Engineer dated March 22, 2005. • Malon Stanley (Multiuse Buildingl -Page Three - 04/12/05 5. The applicant must obtain a SPDES General Permit (NYR-10H057) for Storm Water Discharges (General Permit Number GP-02-01) from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for the construction Activities. 6. All signs shall meet Southold Town Zoning Codes and shall be subject to approval of the Southold Town Building Inspector; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the site plan prepared and certified by Harold E. Gebhard a Licensed Architect, dated December 11, 2003 and last revised March 16, 2005 and authorize the Chairperson to endorse the final site plans subject to a one year review from the date of issuance of the building permit. Enclosed is one copy of the approved site plan for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, ~~.~C.C.~-Q-e-- erilyn .Woodhouse Chairperson Enc. cc: Building Department Town Engineering Inspector Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals ~ ' MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~~~~Of SOUryQ~ OFFICE LOCATION: Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~ Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR H ~ 54376 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON ~ ~ ,Q (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND O~yCOU'M}~,~a Southold, NY IY1` Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 24, 2006 Mr. Stanley Malon Malon Industries, Inc. 264 Linton Avenue Lindenhurst, NY 11757 Re: Site Plan inspection and satisfaction letter for Malon Industries, Inc. 32845 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM 1000-97-5-4.5 Zoning District: Business (B) District Dear Mr. Malon, At your written request for a Certificate of Occupancy final site inspection, Planning Department staff performed a site visit on July 19, 2006. In reference to the above, the Planning Board held a work session on July 24, 2006 to review two site plans as follows: • Site plan approved on Apri112, 2005 prepared and certified by Harold E. Gebhard a Licensed Architect, dated December 11, 2003 and last revised March 16, 2005. Amended site plan approved on April 12, 2005 prepared by Harold E. Gebhard, Architect dated December 11, 2003 and last revised February 15, 2006 and the following Architectural Plans A-1, A-4 & A-5 dated Apri118, 2005 and last revised December 9, 2005. Additionally, the Planning Board reviewed and accepts the amended site plan prepared by Harold E. Gebhard, Architect dated December 11, 2003 and last revised July 3, 2006 detailing the location change of the free standing sign. Subject to the final approval of this sign must meet Southold Town Zoning Codes and shall be approved by the Southold Town Building Inspector. This is to inform you that the site plan requirements have been satisfied. • i This letter does not condone any changes from the approved site plan and approvals from other agencies if required. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Board Office at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, erilyn B. oodhouse Chairperson cc:file, Building Department, Town Engineer ITE PLAN STATUS ~ PORE ,r SITE PLAN TYPE: A~MAENF D_NEW~C WITHDRAWN_INCOMPLETE_ PROJECT NAME: / a ~a .S f r~c zoNEI: 6 ZONE2:_ ZONE3:_ LOCATION: 3 ~ 5;S 1" ra o,r-g HAMLET: C~-/~J~apui SCTM# 1000 - ~ 7 - - OWNER NAME: 4/0.~ .5-~+.1r- r< r•-'c TEL#(63 9~!7-53&S APPLICAN'T' NAME: a o e TEL# (63 ~ ~ - 43 3d L.eG r Ti/ nc G l o vet PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3 ~ "~Jaso~ a 7 $ ,y< THIS SITE PLAN IS FOR A -Its./ O 9& SF Qo.-•.crrre ~~..J~ ON S3 ~Z~ -~cERE~ PARCEL IN THE ~ ZONE LOCATED AT 53.3 rsf o-F oX5 a..r a.~ ->t~< Qr~ oa~ IN C~.-l~ia o ur SCTM# 1000- (SEE ABOVE). DATE PRE-SUBMISSION WRIT"CEN RE UEST: / PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRITTEN RE UEST / INFORMAL RE UEST FOR REVISIONS: T/ / PRE-WORK SESSION: / APPLICATION RECEIVED : t / O PAYMENT RECEIVED: AMOUNTRECEIVED:$ ~6~,g ~i3a/ D FEE AMOUNT: $300.X 1.13 A $.OS X / b 09& SF=$ 90'~ 1S /1 i3, ~ F~7.!! ? ~6. a? EW APPLICATION WORKSESSION HIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT Sr,.'~ l 5 /J o,3 _ll APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS HIN 30 DAYS OF REVIE REVISED SUBMISSION RECEIVED : ,r y~ , ~/~/O~ < tr,rr -'~<al S. ~.//~o...~ O? ~o~ Of rGS.Jr N~.d S . <r <..--...o LEAD AGENCY : OS OTHER ~p /~/a'c COORDINATED:~UNCOORDINATED: (TYPE'I: TYPE2: UNLISTED:' ) SE RA DETERMINATION : / % / O RECEIVED/REVIEW: - RECEIVED DATE REVIEWED DATE DRAINAGE PLAN: / - / - • LANDSCAPE PLAN: / / LIGHTING PLAN: / / REFERRED FOR APPROVALS: REFERRED DATE APPROVAL DATE NOTES / ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: APPEAL#:_ Q ~ / 2Q E ~ BOARD OF TRUSTEE'S: ~~/.J- BUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION:~~~oag S / / S / O_? / ~ S~-) -rsi'r ._i ~ S r-r~ ~ =F'iJ TOWN ENGINEER APPROVAL:~~~ l"~~ I / ~ ~11,~1 U ? O f / O~ / Q ~ Sr..<U pk_, _ ~ - ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: O ~s n, ds~(.f~-~V ~_~l OC ~-l f / S~ .Ftvcs DEP.OF TRANSPORTATION :DOT DPW_, TOS_ 1~/ / 4 / O,? //r / ~ ~r~'" - - SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH : / / ~/1~ SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING : ~ ~,~j ~ % FIRE COMMISSIONERS: "D l l O ,[~l~l~- TOWN ATTORNEY C & R'S -REFERRED DATE APPROVAL DATE NOTES DRAFT COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS: FILED COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS: / / / PLANNING BOARD APPROVALS PREPARED: CONDITIONAL FINAL:-/_/ FINAL: O~' lLld i ? -r~ NOTES ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: FINAL SITE PLAN INSPECTION: DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT / TOWN ENG ENERAL NOTES: c Jr o - fOr /n(Q/ J<K SISS/o! are C5./e- G r ~e..r roi u -'nr /f//s- at n ~ /D/// ~ .SG.a,. f=~i /l~~s..,-c - ":.~~~~LS~ i, ~/~~~~,.Ya ~r_ l/ v~~rf / / / / 1/ / a_ /J / / °~Sldf ~//n.<e Yc /`~'~cf), Yr`~ ~ J~J/C,ra/L< (~i,-O.l r.+,//s.. yy / ~j.J/04 S~ ~r>y- ~.17L. ~/L rN7/7 S/.a~ erao"J e as t .~02¢O J n ~ p <cyJj<°-J,F_~y~.,i i~/ I `J ~~6~fS~ ' ~e(ri~~ 1 ~ 5 - _ _ .ti; BOARD MEMBE~ `'vc'jt.`~i.~'~,-'- Town IaC. `.13095'vIain c2oad RICS3-SRD G. WARD y • ~G~ `g P.ll. Box 1179 Chairman _ _ F s, Southold, ~1ew York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATH_~~I, JR. ~ ~ Z ~ Fax (516) 65-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSIiI. JR. r' ' -c y Tele hone (516) 765-1935 WILLIcLi`d J. CREi'rIERS " ~ ~ ` ' ~ P KENNETHL.EDWARDS = O~ y`O Cate Received ~ Date Comple[ed Filing Fee PLr1,~TIVING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOtiTHOLD APPL]CAT30N FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN New Change of Use Re-use Extension Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or site: ~C' i (Yl-~ iTKOO- ~1~ -5 - ~ 5 Location: M ~ lJ (LDAl~ [NW S ~s`~ Address: t,~ t: rt b u ~ NY (1 ~i 3S Name of Applicant: ~'1"A-1~1L~{ (Y1,i} ~Orv Address of Applicant: ~ GJ r-{ C~LIi"G~l~ /4'V~i LiND£N HUR.sT ~ I 1 7 5 7 Telephone: 3 1 ~J ~7 - 5 3 ~5 Owner of Land: S'L~!3N L.l~( (~'lil 1..Oi`-~ Agent or Perscn responsible for application: ~(~T'Q,IC-(>a C MUO2C ~~b Address: O Z O m~) h~ ~ y SC~C j~-t aC.~~ Telephone: ~(o'a~ ~ `7 G,J - 4330 ~X "7(a.1' ~ 3 Site plans prepared by: H~2~~l,1~ ~ ~~~~j~'t217 , iF~k?CH li4 C.i L!cense No.: Address: .3b3 ~o~;rl W ~CLvJ~o~ ArtE Telephone: Z.iNpfN H UST n"1f ~ ~ 75~ Page Planrnng 8oartl Site ?Ian ApDlicacibn ,wPUCANrs A~nAVrr STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOUC STANu=~ m~i_GIJ being duly sworn, deposes antl says that he resides at ~1v4 L.~ icN /~-U~, L;Nl~ivr~U~Si 11.1J 7 in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above property, or that he is the Gla; N rrYL of the (Titlel ISpectfy whether Partnership or Corp.l which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the tltle to the entire parcel, including all ri~~hts-cf-may, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accardanr with the plans submitted. Signed ",J K~ CC (Owner) Signed iPartner or Corporate officer antl Title) Sworn to me this % ti .N Public) ppTp1C1A C. MOORS perry public, State of New York Suffolk County • No. 48616§,9 , ~otnmiseio~ Eypiree June f ~it~" ' 1+-t6~l ~Z3i1-Taxi `~Z • 7ROJECi ID. NUMBER 617.21 SEAR Appendix C . ~ State Environmental Ouaiity Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR1~1 For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION (fo be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPUCANT:SPONSOq PROJECT NAME cST~-iv~eY /ngLOiv I C'om/nez?eiAC. G~/rF..~ 3. PROJECT LOCATION: ~Oq~- 97-5 -7'S C~~j~ Municipality ~ County UlN~ a. PRECISE LOCATION (Scree[ dCress antl roatl intersections, prominent landmarks, etc.. or provide mapl MA/N 2oA~, C uTCC>oGV~ 5. IS PRO POG'c0 ACTION: ~iNew ? Expansion ? Mcdification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: LiJ/1'7/7?E"~L Cif)L CL'Til~i~ 7. AMOUNT OF UNppD~1AFr=ECTED: Initially ~~~OO2y acres Ultimately ~ ~ acres B. WTI L7L PROPOSED ACTION COMP! Y `NITH c<ISTiNG ZONING CR OTHER 'c:<ISTING UND USE RESTRICTiCNG? yp: Yes L No If Yo, descnhe briefly 9. 'NHA7 IS PRESENT LAND USE IN `/IC:NITY OF PROJECT? _ J Residenllal ? Industrial ~Cpmmercial ? Agriculture ? Park/Fprest70Cen space ~I Other Oescnbe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY IFEDERA L, STAT((E~~OR LOCAL)? .L]I Yes ? NO If yes, li St dgenp%IS) and permit/approvals fjE.A~i-TN D APT n . GOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY `/ACID PERMIT Oft APPROVAL? ? Yes ~ No If yes, Ilst a9enC•/ name and permitlapproval t2. AS A RESULT OF PROPCSED ACTION WIC! EYISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ? Yes INo I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE 3EST OF MY KNOWLEDG'c Applicant/sponsor name: c5? 'n' ~0 ~ ~ //lQ~Date: ~3 eZ Signature: by~~ If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER .IRONMENTAL ASS~'IENT tTO be completed by Agency) • ACTION ECC'cED ANY i YPE I THAESHOLO IN o NYCAR, PART 517.12? It yes. coordinate lne rsvtew pron. ess ado use trio FULL FAF. i_! Yes ? Np a. 'NIL! ACTION flECE!VE COORDINATED AE/IEN AS PROVIDED POA UNLISTED ACTIOfdS .N G NYCRR, PART 617.57 If No, a neganve oerlaratlan ~ .may be suoerseoeq by ano[ner involved agency. I ~'fes ? No i C. COULD ACTION f2E5ULT .N ANY ADVERSE rPEl7T5 ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOUOWING: (Answers may be nandwnlten, if legible? Ct. Existing alr puality, surface or groundwater puality qr puantlty, norsa levols, existing lrafflc panems, aolitl waste proauctlon or tllsposal, potential far erosion, drainage or hooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural pr cultural resources: or cpmmunlty or neignDOrhootl cnaracteR ExDlaln Drlefly: CS. Vegetarian or fauna. fish. shellfish or wildlife species. significant napitats, or ;nreatenao or enaangerea species? Explain briefly. C-s. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or q(mer neural resources? Explain nrlefly C5. Crowm, subsequem gevempment, or related activities likely to be inmced by the prooosetl action? Exoiam briefly. Co. Long term, snort term, cumulative, pr other eifeas not identified in C:we? Expain orieily. C7. Other imoacs (inc:udinq changes in use of =_ither quantity or type of energy)? Explain onefly. D. IS TH EHE. OR IS THERE rJKELY TO aE CONTROVERSY 'nELAT'cD TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE EidVIAONMENTAL IM PAC'. S? ? Yes ? No If Yes. explain briefly PART Itl-OEiERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (io be completed by Agency) INS T AUCTIONS: Far each adverse effect identified above, determine wneMer it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or ruraq; (b) probability of occurring; (cl duration; (d) irreversibility; (el geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant atlverse impacs nave been identified and adepuately addressed. ? Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occtu. Then proceed directly tD the PJLL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ? Check this box if you have determined, based on the inrormation and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, [he reasons supperting this determination: name or '_eaa .agency ?nnt or i vpe name or 2esponuole Oitrcer m lean Agencl i ide or Responsrale Olricer iignatnre or desoemmre Jifrcer in lean ngency ilgnamre or ?reparer pr Oittermt rrom resoaname orticeo Darn ,a 3 rlanning Board Site Plan Application 5',3 / Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Zoning District ~5. Existing Use of Site f/otJ~e /'~minGrira/ Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. Z R P t~ l Si-afL_s h o~cc.c ~r zZa a D .e C m~ xrr-I ~ sPS) a r s~i a, rs-y vvv oy-7 /,Zoo Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) /ST(/oon ~,LY9 Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) :ry e~', Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) ~Percentof Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals -Case # & date Board of Trustees -Case # & date NY State Department of Environmental Conservation -Case # & date P~~/DrNr Suffolk County Department Health Services -Case # & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other NO Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of issuing agency Number and date of permit issued. NO ACT/ON (EXCA I/AT/ON OR CONSTRUCT/ONJ MAV BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPR01/AL OF SITE PLAN BV PLANNING BOARD. l/IOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ***RECEIPT*** Date: 08/30/02 Receipt: 0 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $867.45 Check#: 338 Total Paid: $867.45 ~ C4 ~~a ~ AU6 a 0 2002 go~,~thold Town Name: Malon, Christine & Stanley poanr~in4~ Board 264 Linton Ave. Lindenhurst, NY 11757 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Internal ID: 62068 sn.so Appendix A Sfafe Enviionmenfal Qua/ity Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ? Part 1 ? Part 2 ? Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ? A. The project will not result in any large and important impactlsl and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ? B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.• ? C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. •A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions ~ 7 SI f17VL}~ A2~J ~c~J ~S :'7~ ~!Jn" Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (lf different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so in^di~cate, and specify each instance. Name of Action 5 /f'I-~J~ Z ~ `J / ~ ~~~7 Location of Action (incl/u~de Street Address, Municipality and County) ~C..f c7S ~eilrllUri(~ Name of Applicant/Sponsor /1 S 7r9Nt_e-~ ~'Y)~ C ON Address ~t'07 L, ~t+h city/ Po L/nr/Pn h yrs f State /ti ~ Zip Code ~/7S 7 Business Telephone Cv 7j / ~ 9s 7 - ~J J ~.5 Name of Owner (if different) Address City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: C nns~ucT ~ rnrn~~-c rta~ b: ~~lcL; n Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: ? Urban ? Industrial Commercial ? Residential (suburban) ? Rural Inon-farm) ? Forest ? Agriculture ©Other ~/X - Q! Sid/Y/UCt~~~0771/J't[~cUcr.~~ 2. Total acreage of project area: _~acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland INOn-agricultural) ~ ~7 acres d acres Forested ~ acres ~ acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) ~ acres ~ acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) ~ acres ~ acres Water Surface Area ~ acres ~ acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) t~ acres O acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces ~ Z5 acres ~ acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained ~O°k of site ? Moderately well drained of site. ? Poorly drained of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification Systeml acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ? Yes ~ No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~0-10%'~% ?10- 15%_% ? 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantiall contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? ~ Yes ~ No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ? Yes ~No g. What is the depth of the water table? ~~J (in feet) 9, Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ?Yes ? No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ? Yes ®No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Yes ®,No According to: Identify each species: 1 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? Yes ~ No Describe: 1 3. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Yes ~No If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Yes ~No 1 5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Nj~J a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 1 6. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Nj,A b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 1 7. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~ Yes ? No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow conneciion7 ~ Yes ? No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes ?No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Yes ® No 19. Is the site located in or substantiall contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ©Yes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~ Yes ~No B. Project Description 1 . Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriatel. a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: ~ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ~ acres initially; ~ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: ~ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N~1~ (if appropriatel e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. N~~ % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~ proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? ~D K I, h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is7 ft. 2. Haw much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? ~ tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ?Yes ?No ?N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ©No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ?Yes ? No i 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ~ 5 acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest lover 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ? Yes ~ No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ?Yes ? No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ?Yes ~ No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 2 D ;after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project U 1 1 . Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ®Yes ~ No If yes, explain: 1 2. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ?Yes ~ No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~ Yes ? No Type c5 /q'i~ fTnr`~7 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ?Yes ~No If yes, explain: 1 5. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ?Yes ©No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~ Yes ? No l a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons(~e~) b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Yes ? No c. If yes, give name SDt~TtIOIA ""~eQ?.ISPL'~- location ~-~T'~~f~~~~~ d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~y Yes ? No Page 6 of 21 ! e. If yes, explain: S~ U', ItiDj,p fR-An~S r-~- ~TfFTlan; CaTr,,~>~2cP~. - P,eiv~ TQ~T/s~rn. 5 r'.y-i~o^~ 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. (TfSQ) b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes ~ No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per dayl? ~Yes~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ©Yes ~ No 21 . Will project result in an increase in energy use? ®Yes ~ No If yes, indicate typels) ~2c~rn1c~r~. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pu,,m',p/ping capacity ~ gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day IV ~ gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~ Yes ©No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ?Yes ~ No S lTLll~/~t1 ~3 City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes ? No City, Town Zoning Board ?Yes ®No City, County Health Department ~ Yes ? No Other Local Agencies ?Yes ? No Other Regional Agencies ?Yes ? No State Agencies ?Yes ? No Federal Agencies ?Yes ? No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Yes ? No If Yes, indicate decision required: ? Zoning amendment ? Zoning variance ? New/revision of master plan ? Subdivision Site plan ? Special use permit ? Resource management plan ? Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classificationls) o/f~the site? /J (,15 / nt'~ 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? I 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ^~f A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? /~vs 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ®Yes ©No I 7. What are the predominant land uselsl and zoning classifications within a mile radius of proposed action? ~U`~ i/Lt-rl g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a mile? ~ Yes ~ No g. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? /V / a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ? Yes ®No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? Yes ? No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes ? No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ®Yes ? No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. Yes ? No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best/~of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name /~1',~% ~ /r~ ///Cr~~ Date S ~S°~3 Signature Title y~T~2- _ If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 -PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine signifcance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO ~ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot ~ © ~ Yes ~ No rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table ~ ~ ~ Yes ~ No is less than 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more ~ ~ ~ Yes ?No vehicles. • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ~ ® ~ Yes ? No generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or ~ © ~ Yes ©No involve more than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove ~ ~ ~ Yes 0 No more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Construction in a designated floodway. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) ~NO YES • Specific land forms: ? ? ?Yes ?No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ©NO ~ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ? ? ?Yes ~ No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of ~ ? ?Yes ~ No a protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water ~ ~ ~ Yes ©No body. • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. 0 ? ?Yes ~ No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No 4. Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ?NO YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of ? ? ?Yes ? No water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface ? ~ ?Yes ~ No area. • Other impacts: ? © ?Yes ~ No Page 12 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ?NO ©YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ? ? ?Yes ? No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater ? ? ?Yes ? No than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ? ? ?Yes ? No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Liquid efFluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which ? ? ?Yes ? No presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons ? ? ?Yes ? No per day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into ? ? ?Yes ? No an existing body of water to the eMent that there will bean obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or ? ? ?Yes ? No chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without ? ? ?Yes ? No water and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses ? ? ?Yes ? No which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ©NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ? ? ?Yes ?No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated ? ? ?Yes ? No Floodway. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any ? ? ?Yes ?No given hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ? ? ?Yes ?No of refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed S lbs. per hour ? ? ?Yes ©No or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land ? ? ?Yes ? No committed to industrial use. • Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of ? ? ?Yes ?No industrial development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or ? ? ?Yes ? Na Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. Page 14 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, ? ? ?Yes ? No other than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No g. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened ornon- endangered species? ? NO ? YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident ? ? ©Yes ? No or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of ? © ©Yes ? No mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. • Otherimpacts: © © DYes ©No IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? NO ? YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to ? ? ?Yes ? No agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ? ? ?Yes ? No agricultural land. • The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 ? ? ?Yes ? No acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. Page 15 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of ? ? ?Yes ? No agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). • Other impacts: ? ? ©Yes ©No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different ? ? ?Yes ? No from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of © © ?Yes ? No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or ? ? ?Yes ? No significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or ? ? ?Yes ? No substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within ? ? ?Yes ? No the project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive ? ? ?Yes ? No for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? ? NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ? ? ?Yes ? No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Otherimpacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(8)? ®NO ?YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the ? ? ?Yes ?No resource? • Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the ? ? ?Yes ?No resource? • Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the ? ? ?Yes ?No resource? • Otherimpacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No Page 17 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? © NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or ? ? ?Yes ? No goods. • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ©No IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ? NO ©YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the © ? ?Yes ? No use of any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an ? ? ?Yes ? No energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ®NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ? ? ?Yes ? No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the ? ? ?Yes ? No local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ? ? ?Yes ? No noise screen. • Other impacts: ? ? ?Yes ? No Page 18 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ?NO ©YES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of ? ? ?Yes ? No hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there maybe a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" © ? ?Yes ?No in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied ? ? ?Yes ? No natural gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other ? ? ?Yes ? No disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Otherimpacts: ? ? ?Yes ?No IMPACT ON GROWiH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? ?NO ?YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ? ? ?Yes ? No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating ? ? ?Yes ?No services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or ? ? ?Yes ?No goals. • Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. ? ? ?Yes ? No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, ? ? ?Yes ©No structures or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community ® ? ?Yes ? No services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) Page 19 of 21 i 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ~ 0 ~ Yes ~ No projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. 0 ~ Q Yes ? No • Other impacts: ? ~ 0 Yes ~ No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? ~NO YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 -EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 • D. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS AND WATBR SIIPPLY NARRATIVE REQIIEST. Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. 1. Provide explanation of existing site use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use; compare to proposed use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use. Commercial building will comply with Health Department requirements, all proposed uses permitted and water supply will be from Suffolk County Water. Existing residence connected, or to be connected to public water. 2. Indicate the source of water supply, nearest public water main, nearest public well field, and adjacent private wells (if known). Structure is or will be connected to public water. 3. If public water supply is proposed, indicate the ability of the water to provide water supply to the project. Provide letter of water availability or detailed explanation of status of review by water utility. Public water connection is or will be connected to existing structure. Existing residence could have unlimited occupancy, commercial use will be less intensive then full occupancy of residence. 4. If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on-site water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval or detailed explanation of status of review by agency. N/A 5. Indicate proposed water conservation measures that will mitigate for unavoidable adverse impacts (if any). Conservation measures should include, but not be limited to: a. The use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping. b. The preservation of existing native vegetative buffers. c. The conservation of existing open space areas. d. The implementation of "natural" stormwater management practices (grass swales, filter strips, created wetlands, etc...). e. Commercial use will implement water saving equipment, restaurant is only use which will necessitated greater water use. Office and retail limited water needs. E. VERIFICATION I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor~~lY`am/e/ S~i-~7U[~Y /Y14-tc~~ Date J/1~~5'~)3 Signature Title H___7y~~?~/ L.....-.-- ~ If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before Proceeding with this assessment. Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ***RECEIPT*** Date: 06/06/03 Receipt#: 0 Transaction(s): A 4 O Subtotal 1 Application Fees - ~GiK.a-~-C.aw.~ $406.00 Cash#: 543 Total Paid: $406.00 p ~c~~Ud~ D JUN - 6 2~3 Name: Malon, Christine & Stanley Southold Town 264 Linton Ave. Plannin Board Lindenhurst, NY 11757 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Internal ID: 76449 - r A"+~ I ~ _ 1~ ~w* Y` ~ ,fit F 7s ~ ~:.w t l~"'~ a ~.i ^'k-a s [ . ~ ~ 1 J ~r~ ~ ~ r v.y F .j+. -may w-' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ni , i' r~ v:,2~: 'y,~ rr f .A - ; v ~ . ± ~ ~ ` ? R R V ~ ~ r 7~ s ~4 ~ V ,J ~ ~ 1. h i • S tr ~k, s ~ . "7 ~ ~ r J4~ 3 F~RCki ' PHOIJE N0. • Tul. 17 2006 02~53PMCP1 MALdN INDUSTRIES iNC. ~ rj 264 i.lnion Avenue !.(ndenhutst, New York 117'57 {6i6) 957-7068 FAX 9s~ 7D ~~r c - JUL 1 8 2006 r _ y~ f~iyl ' f'.C~~'s~.~Ni /~Ff~©N ivSuS~a~r~'S' DODO-- l' ~ = s". ,uk yt~ ~-/7 ~oa~ reo ue ut utt~34p 631 234 8903 p.l ~ 65~, CBD DESIGV ANU COlV5TRUC'TON CORP. A\ GcNF.RAL CONTRACTORS 29 C'etllral AvCOLLC Hauppauge, IVY 1178b CONSTRUCS7ON Mnr+actimeNT Phone (b31) 234-SR55 pax (63 i? 234-8903 .....z.....~ Cebniaty 3, 2006 n ~ P~` ~,.J r ( ~ Ms. J.B. Woodhouse, Chairperson ! A="' Town of Southhold Town Hall j ~ - S Southold, NY 11971 ~ P• Re: Malon Project, Permit M31275, 32845 !Main Road, Cutcholue Dear Ms. Woodhouse Please he advised that I met with Bruno front the Planning Dep ,rtment last :-ridgy co submit an as-built survey showing the existing grade elevations. the grades are iu conformance with the approved plans however we did raise the zloor elev~~.tion of the building. This will change the crab heights irrunediately surroun.li?g the building. I met with the owner and the arckuteet to resol~~e this isne and he is working on rerising the Site Plan. He informed ma that he should have it ready by next ~Vodnesday, Fabruaty Ss'. Should you have any questions, please do net hesitate to call. Respectfully subr~ltted, / ^ Sieve Fnt}t'ana ! ~ 75 ~ CHARLES R. CUDDY SLR b ATTORNEY AT LARD 445 GRIFFING AVENUE RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK Mailing Address: TEL: 6311369-8'Z00 P.O. Bax 1547 FAX: (631)369-9080 Riverhead, NY 11901 E-mail: charles.cuddy@verizonmet January 31, 2006 Abigail A. Wickham, Esq. Wickham, Bressler, Gordon & Geasa, P.C. FE6 _ ~ 2CC6 P.O. Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Malon Industries, Inc: Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Ms. Wickham: I received your letter of January 26, 2006. The Planning Board anticipated this problem and requested the applicant take steps to assure that water from its parcel would be contained at its pazcel. The applicant is accordingly revising its plans to provide for water containment and elimination of runoff on the Kaelin's parcel. Very truly yours, Charles R. Cuddy ll///~ CRC:ik Enclosure cc: Southold Planning Board _ ,(3 S s~b~ LAW OFFICF,S WICKHAM, BRESSLER, GORDON &GEASA, P.C. 13015 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 WILLIAM WICKHAM (06-02) MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND ERIC 1. BRESSLER NEW YORK 11952 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD ABIGAIL A. WICKHAM SUITE 11 I LYNNE M. GORDON MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 JANET GEASA 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO. 631-298-8565 631-249-9480 wwblaw@aol.com TELEFAX N0.631-249-9484 January 26, 2006 ~1J _ ~ C Southold Town Planning Board D ~ ~ ~ ~ ' " Post Office Box 1179; 53095 Main Road i' Southold, New York 11971 ^,-ni ~t 1 h, Re: Kaelin's Service Center ' N/W corner of Cox Lane & Route 25 Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCTM 1000-97-5-3 & 4.2 - Ladies/Gentlemen: -,..~~°°°'°'"~~~~i We are writing on behalf of Daniel and Patricia Kaelin, who own the premises immediately East of the Malone Center. As a result of a large raise to the grade of the property, our clients' property has experienced severe flooding and is threatened with extensive damage. Please investigate this matter immediately and have the property owner address the problem. Very t ly yours, ~C(i . Abigail A. Wickham AAW/jt 30/shdtpb cc: Southold Town Budding Dept. Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. ~ ~ ~S Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: J' ~l~c~ 'J `~`S~~ Subject: ~ ~ ~ ~ SCTM#: 1000 - ~ -1 _ S ~ ~ . ~ Date: `?A 3/~ Comments: C.f~.Q.g~_ ~~q_,~ ~ sue,-,,-e~ fit:, F F E B - 3 2006 G x.el.r~B.,. -zZ- sxaxe. z4bmPw 1211 ww mINMm _ aew... u. u. - - .tea... - , -9 , ~'i OS-16-01 Z SI.Bp 1 L 4~ 5EE SEGM,, 6 1 SEE BpEC. ,A. SEE SEC. NO. E'.:,5 G OSB-02-030.3 BEE sEC. lp. ~ os 1B-o1 Tom a souixao i°° vfL'1O vm v w 09-21 ~01 VE F,FIa+upi pua~im ~ h P 1TPLCt OBB-01-008 OBS-03-0122 OBS-O] °t0.1 10-OJ-01 e% rO.N P° 6WTHOLO p .(J6W .p ~ ' ¢EYFlOMxi pdixl 16.i 9 8 ~ V }S N NC, ¢ u.3A ~4. S~B ~ ~ • .6 9 3?Plcl ~ O ON m 2 fiP s ~ la Q % W105m o of I m n 1 1x 31.6 16.J 19 Y 2.6P1c) K'~m ' 5 '1. 12.8 1.BA LSO. J9 1 i B6Plc x l 19.0A • ] Q~, t y 9.OLLC1 6 § s r b rwx v 15 1'1P 11.5 SN' rWl? 2 Q' 2.2PIC1 Y r ° 8 16.2 y O ~ d PPP i 4 ` 31.1 6 N COUNTY OF 611FFOLx 1J •18 J i d 2.04~c) j3lc O N~ ~ O % O x 12'2 L241c1 4 2.6AId § B 11P 4 Imao3xxr wm / 1x44) P\N ~ e 13.t m ~ La41 ° an r cP 1x.10 - 1L4 3> ! O ~ P 3.t4 d 1~pJ O O p0 11.2 V 2.lpld sJ.oe g w a R ,n o 2~ T ® 1L3 8 25p1c y ~ 19 IJ Z } I SP• B ~ d x.6Plc) i Sx?P -o s' 114 I1.B J.SAIC) q 2Ae ~ O /c 6 n.1 rc G 0 's p y g - g J I % tl n.941U p.6Alc1 u S 1 IPId g SZPIC QJp n 11.9 m m r 34 'm { 2.Oe ~ ?9 a ~ ' w ~ ).OP 3L5 ~ 9.1 O O Y21 8 s mB a tggei 235 y d 6.B41c1 t N 18.9 .D 9 a 1 1.OPR 236 H ~ 1.60d J ~ O 3.14 4 fi ry 15 § 30 111P % I,1gC A % lt.T y0P za.a4lu 'd y ~O ll rt. .Q a 8 Yl6 fi d a0 B • t~ c ~ a 9 u. UNpN FFEE SLIfAL 45i Np.9 ,o LL ~ ° 11 pp r 12.2 4 18.8 X8.4 ~ 1.3P1J 1 r,°+ p y ~ JJS P.B41d 0 qq ~ A3G ~ 19P qey t IJ ~y .y ~ ry ~ '°-n. 1 IB.[ ,r x ~ W +O9c ~ 0 .fiiiI 3 w y 58.10 <,%p 6 I J ~ 13.2 4 n I r T d 1.94([1 I],3 16.) ~ iM m Iy,BP rOgc 1. p, 'EiLC, A L941c1 P n.4 ~k 3.34 ~ , •rv, yc W 3 I Y w 1 F 9.641[) ~ A d ~ V' Q s y~6 lOgc /.1114 12r ~ • e8 ~ 'w 6 .Bx F •t0° b e S °rf42 2P ~ 4^ t ~ ~ 1.Ielc1 ' n of 30.01 .k v n y 8/ ( 21 203 o I a ! ~O• le ~3,O41c1 y 16.5 J 20.2 LBP t 19 o.J py;i~ 9.2 9 q/~, gr9C e 3 15L N 9.1 ~ b I6.N 4 ~ m p 1.BP L'~) rs I-94tn S.Lk) 143 16.2 S 20.1 +1• 1 G 126 31A ~ q i O I • J B 2 IB ? r 3~ ' Y t 19 w ~ I 4 y8 R 4I N Ew 18 - 1p `w w 31)` 31 a 1 10.3 1,y6 ly -Bm 21I(d 1 A 33P1 3.BP10 5 `Yh6 L141c) III,'' 4 ] 2 2l f ? R I 4 /~~)L 4 3'1.1(f, 'm 4V 1 ~211P l.1Plc1 3 r~.1 Y~ r `L w.n 't6, % Zl9~ 11.1 6 + r L'30 ,a 2P~ ~'h 4 3.141[) • 1.1 '11 fi e \ A lI.T41c1 O + 4 r a , E m x~ 4jq ~ ~ i ~ ~r gNma w msw ~ 15% S e S 10.611[)1 - ® m2 8 26.3 O w~~ ey CPC y9y m if ~ dp ] e 23m fi 269 lLx 9 f y5~y4 J Y ~ rJ• 1'1 ~ s ~Oq Sqe ~ Ean O/ ~ q 6uY o 13P w 26A • z1.TAlc1 ®zoyllcY ~W' 3 ° ° a m zz m ~ B ~ ~ 5 lA 4App` s •~5 a `=0 rO.N OF fi0UTN0_0 r rj ~ CHEEK ~ ® OP np O s 5 loEw.a+xri B4~'rs, r0 ° ~PP6 ~ : 0 > W~ m 15fi 21° m 266 ~ 4 6 \ a ¢ le rr • , 9 L 0 i ® ~ x5P ~J9 bk J ?!1 ' 1NTLEH LA. i1 nn 9 1 3 - Wp~ ® ~ ~ , 10 FOR VCl. H0. y1•%a r. nMm~ nn 36~_~~ 26.1 fi us .~e m 4 SEE SEC. N0. v 2e~O s¢ ~w~ B § w m °p ` R m ?1 L'+0^ 1W-01-019.3 •ry N tm-oz-wl s 12 m 2 ~ r 25y usx- m 36 ~ x ~x uAnx ~-iNEb ~ ,s ~ lx.r~N-~ LN6 n 9 lT 193 m 26.e fi fi 2J' y ,4.I w..1 a le eoo II S f~.. `2O. 4 ® 8 11 wy ~ W ^ 5 ~ y M4TG1 LK r ~ 1.18%<I wiM $LXE l~N S x , Vq 10 9 - L SEE sE0. Ry 30J j B Y a. a' ,rsz< I L x°°M v M m LMWbi tM t nn Wa wr ~ - bal o.rvtl lt. - - SfN rypun O.n1n w - x Oµ[ss pp.rv OIHEeNSe ALL F •cpEpilES E ~~«WVB~r 56~W~~ lul O^ 1,.N.rvt,m -_F-_ .4x,Bxxt.1.. --p-- r1THN .HE FOLL°y1N0 , T6ICT9, NoncE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © K °B• oBB ~6 '°'N4 SOUTHOLD sccnoN No E ~ ~AIxrEN4xcE,uTExerlox, SALE 6x Real Property iax Service Agency r semxm w Err o.a u.w~ .m. an.t. w - _ ~ - _ xv.wao.mn m - Inr - _ F^E olsrAeurarz 4 Axr 9EnrxN a THE B. 0 9 7 N Brv.,., se. L~.y w• w,y u„ Lmr u.t, w - _ L - _ uewe mm., m _ 1- _ .mA ~ _ sLEEOU cwxrr rAx uAp is vg4®IrEO F ~tY EBN}eF AIV6r~BOp, N Y ]1901 M ms mi ou h+A¢ 6 O wale zJ uw tw 1z.1 4<m o. u.lA 1°T u. r.4 mrvt. u. - _ v - _ Em..n. vnn m - - 1v6uusE .BSm4T6B _ nrxouT 9wrrEx FEroBSSnN oc BI¢ ~ ® ti ~ B=.. F N F¢rmo a A fmn,w x.+ 12.1 4181 ~ u„ y,p.y~ yn _ _ B _ _ PEAL %VOPEPiY TP% SEAYICE elflCY. p 1611CT w 1000 lBZ lm lm w lx 3 e+oe PROPERTY MAP 7 mauve-sex Wtc :.n 30.3uT C ~f OU -J ~L ~T-~ e 4 / _ J - i ~ M::~'~ ~i ~~~~pp~q M1 J• ~i ~p3d3fl4k+ fX'FV,.~ W. `~titi3fi Q i~ ~ NV yy~~~{yJ~ ~ 4 ~N~~ s vns ~ ~ 3 f Y w / °M~~ ~ >~,~tY ti T, ~ f y7 "Y FV~ v ~ nv. ~ j ~-0 rq r. ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 'r~; ~ ~ ~ x v f ~ t~c~rs~+ m~ 2 ~ ~ ,5~y1+~ ~ n ~ ,4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.r"" 4.Qr yl f' I w igHf1~-'~45 ~_~'t3, ~ af. p55.F~ F~ Q ~ I y •x111 N q~ pErN14 3 , -lam ' fi~ G F v ~ {I % max' ~ ~bTltlb • , `"+y llf°u° _ ~,,~1 -AE ~ ~i I-~~~,~.~~E'- k r ' ! . ~ 6y34-0S t COMMERCIAL PROJECT FOR STANLEY MALON MAIN STATE ROAD (NYS 25) GUTGHOGUE, NY Harold E. bebhard Architect %3 North Ybllnoad Avenr LFidrlMrek, N.Y. II'157 GENERAL POLLUTION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE USEPA GENERAL PERMIT, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE EMPLOYED DURING GON5TRUGTION: I. EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED (BY INSTALLATION OF CONSTRUCTION FENCE OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS) AND SHALL REMAIN UNDISTURBED. 2. CLEARING AND GRADING SHALL BE SCHEDULED 50 A5 TO MINIMIZE THE EXTENT OF EXPOSED AREAS AND THE LENGTH OF TIME THAT AREAS ARE EXPOSED, GRADED AND STRIPPED. AREAS SHALL BE KEPT STABILIZED THROUGH THE USE OF TEMPORARY SEEDING AS REQUIRED. 5EED MIXTURE5 SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 501E CONSERVATION SERVICE RECOMMENDATIONS. 3. THE LENGTH AND STEEPNESS OF CLEARED SLOPES SHALL BE MINIMIZED TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES. RUNOFF SHALL BE DIVERTED AWAY FROM CLEARED SLOPES. 4. SEDIMENT SHALL BE TRAPPED ON THE SITE AND NOT PERMITTED TO ENTER ADJACENT PROPERTIES OR PUBLIC ROADS OR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. SEDIMENT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE LIMIT5 OF DISTURBANCE PRIOR TO THE 5TART OF CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION Is COMPLETE. 5. A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT SOIL AND LOOSE DEBRIS FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO LOCAL ROADS. THE GON5TRUGTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE Is PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. . - _ 6. ALL RUNOFF SHALL BE RETAINED ON-SITE IN ACCORDANCE ~ - WITH LOCAL REGULATIONS AND APPROVALS. DRAINAGE INLETS INSTALLED ON-SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENT - - BUILDUP THROUGH THE USE OF APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION. APPROPRIATE MEANS SHALL BE USED TO CONTROL DUST ` ~ I. ~ I.. --r ~'.%J5 DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8. SEDIMENT BARRIERS AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL UPLAND DISTURBED AREAS ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. FOLLOWING PERMANENT STABILIZATION, PAVED AREAS SHALL BE GLEANED OF SOIL AND DEBRIS AND DRAINAGE 5Y5TEM5 SHALL BE GLEANED AND FLUSHED AS NEGE55ARY. q. PROPER MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IS TO BE PERFORMED AS INDICATED BY PERIODIC INSPECTION AND AFTER HEAVY CR PROLONGED STORM5. MAINTENANCE MEASURES ARE TO INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, GLEANING OF RECHARGE BASIN5, 5EDIMENT TRAPS AND DRYWELLS. GLEANING AND REPAIR OF SEDIMENT BARRIERS, REPAIR OF BERMS AND RUNOFF DIVERTERS, AND GLEANING AND REPAIR OF INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. 10. DURING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY \S,~ERED ARCy~T WITH ALL LOCAL REGULATIONS CONCERNING THE DISP05AL OF k.G p E. GF FP SOLID WASTE AND DEBRIS AND TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS WASTE, ~ ~D~ eyv A5 WELL AS SANITARY SEWER AND SEPTIC SYSTEM REGULATIONS. UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE OWNER, THE CONTRACTOR ,~T Is RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE NECESSARY RECORDS ~ ~l OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, PREPARATION OF INSPECTION REPORTS, AND REPORTING RELEASE OF POLLUTANTS TO THE PROPER AUTHORITIES AS NEGE55ARY TO COMPLY WITH THE NATIONWIDE PERMIT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY S 4219 yD~`y- REQUIRED MODIFICATIONS TO THE 5WPPP NECESSITATED BY FIELD CONDITIONS OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES t0 THE ENGINEER FOR REVISION OF THE SWPPP WHERE APPROPRIATE. b•S. PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 1197 ] Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 Robert G. Kassner Margaret Rutkowski Legal Assistant Legal Secretar July 22, 2005 Jeri Woodhouse, Chairwoman Southold.Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Stanley Malon 32845 Main Road, Cutchogue NY SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 David Rose Perennials 5645 Aldrich Lane, Laurel, Ny 11948 SCTM# 1000-120-03-11.2 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been sent to the Planning Board and a Notice of Intent (NOI) has been sent to the New York State Departmental of Environmental Conservation on the above projects. As this is the last requirement requested by the Planning Board, I respectfully request that both projects be scheduled for final approval. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. e y~, Pa icia C. Moore ,r cc: Stanley Malon Peter Harbes ,'j JU!. 2 5 ?005 i MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING OVARD HMEMBERS ~O~~pf SO(/lyolo sout>°ld~lrY i7is7l Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLLAM J. CREMERS N is Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~O 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H. SIDOR (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D. SOLOMON ~~'oorm,~ Southold, NY Telephone: 631 766-1838 Fax: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: July 19, 2005 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer From: Denise Heyse, Planner Trained y / Re: Malone, Stanley (Multi-Use Building) 32845 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11952 SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5 Status: Approved on April 12, 2005 We are in receipt of materials submitted by the applicant in reference to the SPDES requirements. This is for your files and information. Required Return Date: N/A This site plan is for a new 18,112 sq. ft. commercial center on a 1.2356 acre parcel in the B Zone located approximately 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane, on the n/s/o NYS Road 25 (Main Road), also known as 32845 NYS Road 25, in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5 Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Cover letter, 1 Site plan Received July 6, 2005. ~ ~ s~ PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765643 Robert G. Kassner Margaret Rutkowski Legal Assistant Legal Secretary July 7, 2005 Jeri Woodhouse, Chairwoman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. BOX 1179 Southold, NY11971 Re: Stanley Malon 32845 Main Road, Cutchogue NY SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: Enclosed are three copies of of the above project site plan and Storm Water Polution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) A notice of intent (NOI) has been sent to the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) for a SPDES General Permit #GP-02-O1. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, J ~ .Y6 Patricia C. Moore cc: Stanley Malon Encls. /,~,~/~v ~ s~- PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 Robert G. Kassner Margaret Rutkowski Legal Assistant Legal Secretary July 7, 2005 Jeri Woodhouse, Chairwoman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY11971 Re: Stanley Malon 32845 Main Road, Cutchogue NY SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: Enclosed are three copies of of the above project site plan and Storm Water Polution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A notice of intent (NOI) has been sent to the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) for a SPDES-General Permit #GP-02-01. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, .YGG'~~CL C ~~~.t~ Patricia C. Moore cc: Stanley Malon Encls. -`f --i- _ ~ i ~i _ n{; t_ I i j ~r MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~DF S~(/ry ~ P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~Q~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS u+ ae Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G ~ ~p 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~~~~p ..~1 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D. SOLOMON (iQU~~~ Southold, NY Telephone: 831 786-1835 Fax: 831 786-3138 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 20, 2005 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Pat: RE: Stanley Malon SC Tax Map # 1000-97-5-4.5 After reviewing the above files, we are returning the following extra material: Date of Ma ISurve Date Received # co ies _ Nov. 7, 2001 March 4, 2003 4 Prelim. Dec. 28, 2001 Jan. 7, 2002 1 Rev. Dec. 8, 2003 Dec. 18, 2003 1 Rev. Jul 19, 2004 Jul 22, 2004 1 Rev. Se t. 10, 2004 Se t. 14, 2004 3 Rev. Nov. 8, 2004 Nov. 10, 2004 4 Rev. Jan. 14, 2005 Jan. 21, 2005 7 Very ly you , Bru o Se on Senior Site Plan Reviewer Encs. MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~~F SQ(/fy P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~Q~ Ol0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLLAM J. CREMERS N ~e Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G.2` ~ ~p~ 54375 State Route 25 GEOR EI D SOLOMON Ol~~'oU~ ~ (cor. M Sou ho1dYNY ga Ave.) Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 11~h day of April, 2005 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed site plan for Whitaker House located on the s/e corner of NYS Road 25 & Horton's Lane in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-61-1-5. 6:05 p.m. Proposed site plan for North Fork Deli (Bremer's Deli) located on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Legion Avenue in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-142-2-22. 6:10 p.m. Proposed site plan for Island Health Project located 100' e/o Mansion House Drive on Central Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-6-6-20.7. 6:15 p.m. Proposed site plan for Stanley Malon located approximately 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane on the n/s/o NYS Road 25 in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-97-5-4.5. 6:20 p.m. Proposed site plan for LIN Cellular Communications (Cingular Wireless) located on the n/s/o CR 48 approximately 728' w/o Cox's Lane in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-96-1-19.1. Dated: 3/29/05 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn Woodhouse Chair PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, MARCH 31, 2005, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Traveler-Watchman 1, MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~~0~ SDUjjyO South Id ~NY 11971 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~Q Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS N ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~O 54375 State Route 25 GEORGEI D SOLOMON ~~'YrioU,~ry ~ (wr M Sou ho1dYNY ~ Ave.) 1111 Telephone: 631 76b-1835 Fax: 631 76b-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 11th day of April, 2005 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed site plan for Whitaker House located on the s/e corner of NYS Road 25 & Horton's Lane in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-61-1-5. 6:05 p.m. Proposed site plan for North Fork Deli (Bremer's Deli) located on the n/e corner of NYS Road 25 and Legion Avenue in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-142-2-22. 6:10 p.m. Proposed site plan for Island Health Project located 100' e/o Mansion House Drive on Central Avenue, Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-6-6-20.7. 6:15 p.m. Proposed site plan for Stanley Malon located approximately 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane on the n/s/o NYS Road 25 in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-97-5-4.5. 6:20 p.m. Proposed site plan for LIN Cellular Communications (Cingular Wireless) located on the n/s/o CR 48 approximately 728' w/o Cox's Lane in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-96-1-19.1. Dated: 3/29/05 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn Woodhouse Chair Rpr 11 O5 01:26p ~re.La w_Offiee ~31 765 4643 ~p,l - ~ ~-~-~E71 J ~ YATRICIA C.1~100RE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (63 765-4330 Fax:(63l)765-4643 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET The Fages comprising this facsimil=_ L'rar.smission contain confidential information from Patricia C. Moore. This information is intended solely for use by the indi-r_dual entity named as the recipient hereof. i£ you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this trar.sm'ssien is proh_bited. If you have received this =ransmissien in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrance tc retrieve this transmission at no cest to you. TO: /(/r? d RE: O/1 DATE • / ~ S TOTAL NUMB_R OF PAGES INCLCUING COVER SHEET IF TPAN3S41SSION IS FAULTY OR .VCGMPLETE, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. CLIENT NAME: OPEi2ATCR: ~ Apr 11 O5 01:26p Moore Law Office 63 765 4643 p.2 j ::'SS 1 ~ ~ , 1 w I . - ~3k'.1G,. ~ t ~ ~ i. ? N Lt_t i ! s ! 'Gx~ ~I _„9 WATE~~ ` Iii ( ~ Hr_. FaF:o:,r SERVICE - 't<,r+ i ~i, ,Jk it ~ I' y ~ I I i ~ - i II 1 . r,~, E -{',CIS TiNG W F x STAN I I i~ -i ~ E`E ~~c ~.`L ~l rl-.. i - I ~ N~_W -PJ L.: :'C ?T r NV Rr_11 vE~~ - Y K rn 1~~ ~ t ~'?PF~' LIY~F - - . ~ j'~~~ ~ ~ B~bM[ C.O.m`t.~~~~1__ OLHOr1fL Br'1r70s ! } - ApptnratEot.Otl?a~RL~s$iylllYmib f _ i yr r j~ , ' i law rwrw~d w19~ 9uRdk - ~H Drpulmwt of Hadr3 BeMOes reud~ frl~ai to ww* W ~ ~ tnsVPb asi ~awar lispeioL Ragvdl~w d aq1 omG~iow, meaa~teaaios ar kdc d dotN1, aemdrncfJoa L xgoin3 to is 1n ~ ' { .aoaa.aa .1w 16. emeL:a wemis aeaaifiee..ea .rylieobla .Lfodud..anleu.ped8ola ; ~ n.p>~zm..~.a ~ ' b~••iss'°~oa .r: ;i ' ' t ~ ; , ''z ~ r ~ - STANLEY MALON SITE PLAN FOR STANLEY MALON COMMERCIAL PROJECT, INC. 1000-97-5-4.5 Proposal is for a new 18,112 sq. ft. commercial center on a 1.2356- acre parcel. MON. -APRIL 11, 2005 - 6:15 P.M. i AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as SCTM: 1000-97-5-4.5; 83.35' west of Cox Lane on the N/s/o Route 25> 32845 Route 25 by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on April 11, 2005 ~ , r Patricia C. Moore Youy.Alartre rmt ~fgnature 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 Address 30. aoo~ r-._,_ Date ~a~r.~~d.~~G~.~i' pPR - F 2~0~ Notary Pub c MARQARET C. R(JTKOWSf0 ~ Notary Public, State of New York No. 4982528 Qt~lified in Suffolk COUIgr Comrniseion Fxp~res June a. _~,oo PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: noon, Fri., 4/8/05 Re: Proposed Site Plan: Stanlev Malon Commercial Project SCTM#: 1000-97-5-4.5 Date of Hearing: Mondav, April 11, 2005. 6:15 p.m. ~ E PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 April 5, 2005 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Stanley Malon SCTM: 1000-97-5-4.5 Hearing: Monday, April 11 at 6:15 p.m. Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Enclosed please find four signed Return Receipts received for the above referenced matter. Ve truly yours, ~ ~ atricia C. Moore. PCM/mr Encls AF - , ~ ~ /~S PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Pax: (631)765-4643 April 4, 2005 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Stanley Malon Commercial Project Premises: SCTM: 1000-97-5-4.5 Hearing: April 11, 2005 Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Enclosed please find the Affidavit of Posting for the above referenced application. Ver truly your e Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr Encls. APR _ ~ `qua { - s • Southold Town Planning Board Revised Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the General Business District, Zone B; 4. That this site plan is for a new 18,112 sq. ft. commercial center on a 1.2356 acre parcel in the B Zone located approximately 83.35' west of Cox's Lane, on the n/s/o NYS Route 25 (Main Road), also known as 32845 NYS Route 25, in Cutchogue; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. (2nd FI., North Fork Bank). Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, April 11.2005 at 6:15 u.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Traveler Watchman, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Stanley Malon Commercial Project Date: 3/29/05 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNINYGNBB ARD MEMBERS ~o~aOF SOUjyolo SouthOold,oNY 11971 Chair r_ # OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS N ]c Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~O 54375 State Route 25 GEOR EI D SOLOMON ~lyC (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) DU~, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 30, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mrs. Moore: Re: Stanley Malon Site Plan 32845 Main Road, Cutchoeue SCTM #1000-97-5-4.5 Zone B The above site plan application was reviewed at the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on Januazy 25, 2005. The above site plan application was reviewed at the Architect Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on March 3, 2005. Attached is a copy of the meeting minutes. After you have reviewed the ARC resolution for your project, please modify the plans according to the conditions and submit the revised plans to the Planning Board. If there are any questions you may contact us at 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respe~lly yo s, ~f "Bruno Semo Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc: ARC minutes SOUTHOLD TOWN~^"`'~~'~ ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE March 3, 2005 The ARC met at Town Hall Annex at 4:OOp.m., Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman; Robert I Brown, Co-Chairman Herbert Ernst, Southold; Ron McGreevy, Mattituck Nicholas J. Planamento, Southold Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board Staff, Marie Beninati of Beninati Real Estate, Henry and Stephanie Bremer of Bremer's Deli, Pat Moore for Malon Project and Moore Project MOVED by Robert Brown and seconded by Herbert Ernst, it was RESOLVED to accept the minutes of the January 25, 2005 meeting. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Whitaker House (Main Road, Southold) SCTM# 1000-61-1-5 The applicant submitted drawings for the restoration of the existing "Historic Building" for use as first floor offices with second floor apartments. The clapboard siding will be light grey in color with white trim, black shutters and red doors. It was noted that the original chazacter of the building is being accurately maintained And has been reviewed and approved by New York State Historical agencies. MOVED by Robert Brown and seconded by Herbert Ernst, it was RESOLVED to defer to the previously secured State Historical approvals with the following conditions: Catalogue cuts of all pole and building mounted lighting must be submitted to the committee for review and approval Location of HVAC equipment must be located and shown with proper screen planting Vote of the Committee: Ayes, Garrett A. Strang, Robert Brown, Herbert Ernst, Ron McGreevy Abstentions, Nick Planamento Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. Bremer's Deli (Main Road, Mattituck) SCTM# 1000-142-2-22 Originally submitted Aug3, 2004 and held over for a ZBA determination, the applicant submitted additional information for the reconstruction of a previously existing deli. The siding will be cedar clapboard with a natural finish. All windows, doors and trim will be white. The roofing will be Certainteed Seal King shingle "Moire Black" in color. ARC meeting March 3, 2005 Page two MOVED by Nick Planamento and seconded by Ron McGreevy, it was RESOLVED to gran conditional.- approval subject to receipt of the following; Catalogue cuts of building mounted lighting for the Main Road elevation must be submitted to the committee for review and approval HVAC equipment must be shown with proper screen planting Any ground or building mounted signage must be submitted to the committee for review and approval Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission ofthe original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. Cingular Wireless (C.R.48, Cutchogue) SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 L_ T The Committee reviewed the application and determined that there were no architectural features requiring comment or approval. MOVED by Garrett A. Strang and seconded by Robert Brown, Vote of the Committee: Ayes All Island Health (Central Ave., Fishers Island) SCTM# 1000-6-6-20.7 ~ The committee reviewed the drawings submitted by the applicant as well as a written report from the Fishers Island Committee member regarding architectural features details and finishes. MOVED by Garrett Strang and seconded by Herbert Ernst, it was RESOLVE to accept~he application as submitted. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. Cutchogue Business Center(Cox Lane & Oregon Road, Cutchogue) SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.6 Originally submitted Aug.3, 2004 and held open for submittal of additional information. MOVED by Nick Planamento and seconded by Herbert Ernst, it was RESOLVED to accept the location of the roof vents however all outstanding items from the August 3, 2004 meeting must be submitted for review and final approval. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All(Robert Brown absent) Albertson Marine(Main Road, Southold) SCTM# 1000-56 3-13.4 MOVED by Garrett Strang and seconded by Herbert Ernst, it was RESOLVED ,to tablee discussion on the revised submittal until the next meeting so as to have a better representation ofthiersrrCrnittee members as well as the applicant's agent present. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All(Robert Brown absent) ARC meeting March 3, 2005 Page three Malon Project(Main Road, Cutchogue) SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Ms. Moore, agent for the applicant, submitted a rendering and letter from the project architect outlining the materials, colors and details proposed to be used. MOVED by Ron McGreevy and seconded by Nick Planamento, it was RESOLVED to grant nditional approval based on the following: Materials, colors and details will be as per the architects rendering and letter dated February 4, 2005. There will be no building mounted signage and ground mounted sign will be white background with black letters. There will be no building mounted exterior lighting Inasmuch as recessed soffit lighting will be used Pole mounted light fixture will be as submitted HVAC equipment will be high efficiency with no visible chimney stacks and all ground mounted equipment must be shown with proper screen planting Any plumbing roof penetrations will be copper clad or a color to match the roofing and located north ofthe main roof ridge Vote of the Committee: Ayes All(Robert Brown absent) Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval ofthe Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. Moore Law Office(Main Road, Southold) SCTM# 1000-70-2-8 Ms. Moore as the applicant submitted drawings and described an addition to her office building for the purpose of increased office space and accessory apartments. It was noted that the proposed addition was in keeping with the architectural style of the existing building. She noted that the new roofing would match the existing, except the carport will have a green ribbed steel roof. All roof penetrations would be on the north side of the ridge and any HVAC equipment would also be on the north side of the building with proper screen planting. The link between the existing building and accessory apartment is proposed to be sided with cedar left natural or stained white with white trim. The siding on the accessory apartment is proposed to be vinyl. All building mounted lighting is to match existing. There will be no changes to the site and building mounted signage. MOVED b Nick Planamento and seconded by Herbert Ernst, it was RESOLVED to grant nditio~. ~eliminary a proval based on the following: ' All of the final material, finish and color selections will be submitted to the committee in writing or be shown on the final drawings. Serious consideration will be given to an alternate siding material for the accessory apartment (ie. natural wood or cement board) so as to be compatible with the remainder of the building, Vote of the Committee: Ayes All(Robert Brown absent) ' ARC meeting March 3, 2005 Page four Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. Meeting Adjourned at 5:45 P.M. The next meeting has yet to be scheduled. Garrett A. Strang; Co-Chairman • • PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:NEW YORK --------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVTI' Stanley Malon Commercial Project OF (Name of Applicant) MAILINGS CTM Parcel #1000-97-5-4.5 x COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, Vanessa Craigo residing at Cutchouge, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 22"d day of March, 2005, I personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Southold, New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown on the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the (X) Assessors, or ( )County Real Property Office Southold, for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. (Signature Vanessa Craigo Sworn to before me this 29th day of Mazch, 2005 r ( otary Public) ~ RllTKOWSIO Notary Public, State of New Ybrli No. 4982528 Quelifled In Sutbik t'~aar4~ Commkaion Expires Jura 9, a O o 7 PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. I r` ~ ~ r:° ~ p I m ~ m Postage $ OlD N}-\ Poemge $ ~ J'~'. p CeMfletl Fee N p Cartllletl Fee y~atm VD p ~ 2 IJ rM~[ j p Rawm Recalpl Fee H » p Ralum RatelPt Fee cqJ (Endorsement RequUad) ; (EndpreemaM Requiretl) ^n O p ResMCtad Delivery Fee ~ -J C~ rlW~ ~ Reetrkletl Delivery Fee ~ (ErMOreemant Requlretl) `J~' ~ (Endorsement Required) N ~ $ t./~' G ~ fl.l Total Poetega & Fees $ Total Postage 8 Feea p sander Glover, Jr. o Cutchogue New Suffolk Hi ical Coun 1 S t` sYieei,iipr:Nu:; 815 Oox Lane PO Box 17 arPO Box No. or PO Bar Ab. CiN•3Yaie, ZIPM CdY, Stare, ZIf44 Cutcho ue N 11935 Cutcho ue NY 11 35 ,rr r, •e - - . ra ~ ~ ~ ~ .n ' N nJ " Postage $ v` poytega $ „i Ny uT p cemnedFae '`.Z` 7 p CeNfletlFea ~ p p I p Retum Receipt Fee J ~ ~ ~ Wrb p RsWm Reeelpt Fee Pos4nerk (EntlorsamaM Required) 'EndormmeM Requlretl) ~ ~ ~8 j Here ~ p RasMCted Defrvery Fee ' r-9 Reatrkled Oellvery Fee ~ V ~ ~ (EntlorsameM Requlratl) ~ u-1 ('ndoreemant Required) ~ O I nJ ojr~~' ) f1J Total Postage 8 Fees $ - S P Sj / S T,W pgetaga 8 Fees $ _ S O MTO p p Daniel n. naelin II p ° ~ ~irear,ArCNa-- x~Da e7.--~--Keel.xn.--ZZ---&.:~aC'~s.~a..~aelin - - - orPOBoxrvo. 54 Tuthill Lane wPO Ap~~p.; 54 Tuthill Lane cm{sieie:ziP+a---Riverhead-S---Ni'---1-1901------°--------------- bnn'sn.----------------...--------°-------...------...--------...------°`----... 1 e'zrPw Riverhead, NY 11901 :rr r, :r rr •e j u-l ~ ~ I ~ .n i N Postage $ O ~ N ~ y p CeMfletl Fae J 1 \ I p u. perk O Rehm Receipt Fee (EMareement Required) ` ltfrlR 9 ~ ~7°rs p Restricted Delivery Fee ~ (Endorsement Requiretl) , N Total Postage 8 Feea $ S P 5 00 l' 00 l p nr To p WMS Realty Co. 3aBPD8 ~ 3`lieet„Apt:NO o. PO BOx NO. 6 Main Street ciy,sieie,-ziad Garden City, NY 11530 rr rr i' r ~I i 1 i - ¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Signature ¦ Com lets items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Si afore n ? gyem P item 4 'rf ResMcted Delivery fs desired. ~(,~,ri, item 4If Restricted Delivery is desired. X ? Agent ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse X ? Adaressee ¦ Print your name and atldress on the reverse Cj Addreesee so that we can return the Carl to ydD. e. Received by (Punted Name C. Dat of livery_ so that we can return the card to you. S. R ceicv~ed by/ (~Po'nted wane) C. Date f Delivery ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, rx~r • ~r M tyro ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, / _ ~oV t ~ 3 ~ ~S or on the front if space permits. or on the front if space permits. V D. Is delivery address dAferent tmm r[em t4 Yes D. Is delivery address different from Rem 1? ? Yes 1. Mule Addressed to: If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No 1. Article Addressed to: If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No Cutchogue-New Suffolk Historical Council WMS Realty Co. PO Box 714 6 Main Street Cutchogue, NY 11935 Garden City, NY 11530 3. Service Type 3. Service Type ? Cert~ed Mall ? Express Mail ? Certified Mail ? Express Mail ? Registered ? Retum Receipt for Merck m ? Registered ? Retum Receipt for Merchandise O Insured Mail ? C.O.D. ? insured Mail ? C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes 4. Restricted Delivery? (EMra Fee) ? Yes 2. Article Number 2. ArtlcleNumber 7334 2510 0005 2376 9638 (lYaruler lrom aerWCe labeq 7004 2510 0005 2376 9645 PS Forn 3811, February 2004 Domesac Retum Receipt PS Form 3811, February 2004 Danesgc Rotum Receipt tcues-oz-M-tsar roz595-0rM-tSao r . . . . ~ • • . . . ¦ Completeifems 1, 2, and 3. Also complete '3i natum l~ (I ¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete ~ 'g"~1fB ? nt iteQQ~I 4'If R~ststrycted Delivery is desired. X y;?V"I(h ) 17 l~gent item 4'rf Restricted Delivery is desired. X ~ ¦ Prfi't`your~rr~e and address on the reverse Addressee. ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse ? Addressee so'tFiat w~ return the card to you. e. peceivea by (Prrnrei wane) C. Date of Deli so that we can return the card to you. s. Received by (Pdntedlvame) c Date of Deli ¦ Att~h thiSrca~ to the back of the mailpiece, 3 20! vc~~ ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ~ ar~ . VS or'~ri the' ntrf space permits. or on the front if space pernks. D. Is delivery address differem from item 1? ? Yes D. Is delivery address different from aem 1? ? Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES, emer delivery address below: ? No i • Article Addessetl to: If YES, enter delivery address below: O N Daniel A. Kaelin II Daniel A. Kaelin II 5 54 Tuthill Lane Patricia Kaelin Riverhead, NY 11901 54 Tuthill Lane s. Service rype Riverhead, NY 11901 - _ s. service Type ? Certified Marl ? Express Mail S C ~ Certified Mail ? Express Mail ? Registered ? Retum Receipt for Merchandise ~ Registered ? Retum Receipt for Merchandise tlYM 0 Insured Mail ? C.O.D. ? Insured Mail D C.O.D. 4. Restricted Deliveyl (Extra Fee) ? Vas ~ 4. rioted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes 2. ArticleNUmber 7334 2513 3005 2376 9614 7 ~ IQN~ _ 0005 2376 9621 (FrensYer M1'om servlaa labsi ns/er hom PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestk Return Receipt toz5e5-oz-M-t sao PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-15x0 • PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney a[ Law 51020 Main Road ~ ~Q ~ Southold, New York 11971-4616 ~\i,, Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 29, 2005 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.0. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Stanley Malon SCTM: 1000-97-5-4.5 Hearing: Monday,April 11 at 6:15 p.m. Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Enclosed please find the fidavit of Mailing with five (5) Certified Mail Receipts and ~ signed Return Receipts received thus far for the above referenced matter. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore ~cc~ PCM/mr ~ Encls § 58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1 - Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 68.1. Providing notice of public hearings. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-1886 as L.L. No. 26.1886. Amendments noted where applicable.] § 68-1. Providing notice of public hearings. Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. The board or commission reviewing an application shall provide for the giving of notice: A. By causing a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. By requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by the town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application abuts, giving notice of the application, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than ten (10) feet fmm the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven (7) days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street 5801 i -z6 -es _ • § 58-1 SOUTHOLD CODE § b8-1 from the property included in the application. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven (7) days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The applicant or agent shall file an affidavit that s(he has complied with this provision. 5802 ~ _ 2c _ ~ LEGAL CE Notice of Pir~tearing Nt3TICE I6 H13R13B1' GIVEN that, pursuant. to Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Sotfthoid, a ppublic hearing will COiJNTY OF Si1FFOLK be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at, the Town STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Hall, Main Road, ~outhold, Jac ueline M. Dube bein dul sworn, New Yolk on the 11 day of 9 g y April; 20os on the question of says that she is the Legal Advertising the following: Coordinator of the Traveler Watchman, 6 00 Q,m. Proposed site lan for ~er House loeate~ on a public newspaper printed at Southold, the ~ met of'i~ih"S l>;od 25 in Suffolk Count and that the notice of Aorton's Lane in Southold, Y; Town:;df Southold, County of which the annexed is a printed copy, has Suffolk, State of New York. been published in said Traveler Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-61-1-5. Watc man once each week ~'6.os p.m. Propposed site plan for...~.......week(s)r~ successively, for North Fork • Helr'remer's ~J I1`iocate'" `on tfie"" a corner corn rt cl on the1..J............day of of.NYS Road 25 and Legion 2005. Avenue in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of $uffalk, i State of Hew York. 'Suffolk , , , , , ' County Tax Map Number. 1000- ~ 142-2-22. 6.10 p.m. Proposed site plan for Is7attd. HeNltti' ated IOb' e1o Mansion ouserve II on Central Avenue, Fishers Sw t efore me thi>,,.Jl.....day of Islahd, Town of S,buthold, 2005. County of Suffolk, State of New York, Suffolk County Tax Map ~ Number 1000 6 6 20 7. b 15 p m. Proposed site plan / fo $ f~eyy ~IalQn '..~o ted 1~~.. GGf......... ap~'iox~mat'ely $3 35' w'!o x's Notary Public Lane on the n/s/o NYS Road 25 in. Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, Suffolk Emily Hamill COllil Tax Map Number 1000- NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York 97-5~5. - No. O1HA5059984 6:20 p.m. Proposed site pIan Quaiirea so Suffolk County fOr hh LIN, C<ellnlpt Commission expires May 06, 2006 Cofninunications (Cingular Wireless). located on the n/s/o CR 4$ approximately 728' w/o Con's Lane In Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County. of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 96x1-19.1, Dated: 3/29/05 _ BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLAN- NING St7ARD Jerilyn Woodhouse. Chair 1X 3l31f05{676) STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) LINDA RANDOLPH, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 29th day of March, 2005 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road. Southold, New York 4/11105 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for The Whitaker House SCTM#1000-61-1-5 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for North Fork Deli (Bremer's Deli) SCTM#1000-142-2-22 6:10 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for Island Health Project SCTM#1000-6-6-20.7 6:15 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for Stanley Malon SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5 6:20 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed Site Plan for LIN Cellular Communications SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Lind andolph Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this '~~'dayof ~a,r~C-- ,2005. ` - _ oG Nota Pu lic ~ MELANIE DOROSKI NOTARY PUBLIC, State of NewYOAr No.01D04634870 Qualified in Suffolk County ~c,..~ Commission Expires September 30~ . • • Page 1 of 1 Randolph, Linda From: Dina Kontokosta [dkontokosta@travelerwatchman.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 8:50 AM To: Randolph, Linda Subject: Re: Legal Ad Hi, Linda. We got it. Thanks. Original Message From: Randolp.h,. Linda To: eddonal@travelenvalchman,com Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 8:35 AM Subject: Legal Ad Please print the attached ad in the March 31 edition and send confirmation of receipt as soon as possible. Thank you. 3/29/05 t t 7004 2510 0005 2376 9546 7~~4 2510 X005 2376 9584 o'E 1 ~m 8 gr ~a m S~3 Sa cq~, e @ e ~ ~j ~ rrti ~ lb ~ 4) ~ ~ w ' ~ M d ' EA ' w m ~ !x ~ ~ L ~ w a• :w W ,J - tF m N ; r• ~ z tw ; o ~ ,H z 4 . - - w;w 4 m;rr jZ N n ~ r: r• ~ In :w w• H- 7004 2510 0005 2376 9560 7004 2510 0005 2376 9577 y m~yp m 0• y ;na ~ ° C ~ g`~3 o a N; pg~~p~~ ti ~ o°tlm1 o°a pH. w mm ..S 3a m s~ • ~j ~~j V] ~ 3m ~a n mN a ; r• a 8 ~ 8.. v a: a 8 ~ ~ v x; F ; ~ g ~m r ° ~ a w ~ $a $m m eiH , ~ B ~ ~ w . • • m > ~ I mil iw ~W~ ~ roH JWGa w;~;m O. J ;p ~~V a; ~ ; F- ~ n cn; n ~ - C I p J!I rt ri: ~Cj~ • (D 11 Ste. • ~-i ro ~ H z `Y' O ~ .c • ~ v' W ~ ~ ~ m ~ } _ a~ a~ ,ea `aka I I ~ !I.~. A. Si. ature ¦ Com late items 1, 2, and 3. Also corn late A. Signature ¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete p p ~ ~ item 4 H Restricted Delivery is desired. ~ Agent item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. X ~ Agent ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse X ~ Addressee ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse ~ • O Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by (P 'tea Name)/ C. Data of Delivery so that we can return the Card to you. g, i by (Printed Name) C. ate of livery f ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ~ ~1~,~~=y ~~r9Cn( h•1 S^.~5' ~ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, tel.?lUrs or on the front if space permits. or on the front if space permits. - ~t~l, j D. Is delivery atldress dffferent from Rem 17 ? Yes D. Is delivery address different from item 11 ~ Yes 1. Article Addressed to: 1. Article Addressed to: It YES, enter delivery address below: ? No If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No Cutchogue-New Suffolk WMS Fealty Inc. Historical Council 6 Main Street PO Box 714 Garden City, NY 11530 Cutchogue, NY 11935 a. ice type 3. ice type Certfied Mail ~ Express Mail Certified Mail ? Express Mail i registered ? Return Receipt for Mechandise Registered ? Return Receipt for M. /lndise ? Insured Mail ? C.O.D. ? Insured Mail ? C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Exha Fee) ? Yes 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? Yes z. ArticleNUmber 7004 2510 0005 2376 9546 2. Article Number 7004 2510 0005 2376 9577 (iransler horn servke tabu (rrans/er horn service IabeQ PS Fom13811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt to2ss542-rt15w PS Form 3811, Febnlary 2004 Domestic Ratum Receipt 10258502-M-15C0 j , • • • i • • • 1 ~ • • , • • • ignature A. si nature ~ ¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete f/~ p ~t ¦ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete ? {went Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ~ IKC, dresses item 4'rf Restricted Delivery is desired- ~ dreseee ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse C D ~ D 50 that we can return the card to you. Received by (Pantetl N e) Doe _of Nary so that we can return the card to you. a Received by (Printed N e) ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ~ E~ ~.t~ •t O / ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ~ ~S/ ~ or on the front if space permits. or on the front if space permits. y s D. Is delvery adtlress diffffeent froth Rern 17 ~ Yes D. Is delivery address dRferera from Rem 17 ? 0 1. ArtMle Addressed to: Ii VES, enter delivery address below: ? f•' 1. lvticle Addressed to: If VES, enter delivery address below: , Daniel A. Kaelin, II Daniel A. Kaelin, II and 54 Tuthill Lane Patricia Kaelin - Riverhead, NY 11901 54 Tuthill Lane s. s,ef~ice type Riverhead, NY 11901 ~ 3. Sp(vice TYpe 'Certified Mall ?Express Mall k'VCertified Mail ? Express Mail ? Registered ? Return Receipt for Merchandise ? Registered ? Return Receipt for Mechandise ? Insured Mall ? C.O.D. ? Insured Mail ? C.O.D. 4. Restdcled Deliverlrl(Extra Fee) ? Yes 4. Restdcted Delivery! (Extra Fee) ? Yes - 2. ArcICIeNumber 7004 2510 0005 2376 9560 2. Article Number 704 2510 0305 2376 9584 (transfer horn seMce label) (IFens/er frOrll SBMce taDelf DOmeetlp Rehm Receipt 102595-02-ht-1540 Domestic Return Receipt to259soz-M-154u PS Form 3811, February 2004 PS Forth 3811, February 2004 r i i i I m ~ ~ Ir m ~ 1 o ~a~aad Fee 3~ 11z' , Podtllfetr p Rehm Receipt Fee ~ , C ~?O ..ff11'"`__~.~m__ (Endorsement Requiretl) ~ ~ Restrictod Delhrery Fee 's (Endorsement Raqulretl) -,S Lrl l nJ Total Poetaga 8 Fees $ S p t 7p p Leander Glover, Jr. or POeorNO 8i5 Cox Lane cm; crate, z~P.a Cutcho ue NY 11935 e • e e e e ¦Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A Signature item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ? Agent ¦ Print your name and address on the reverse X ? Addressee SO that we can return the card to you. B. Received by (Print eme) .Date of Delivery ¦ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ee//dd~~a~~,I or on the front if space permks. P (~.(o?H/ / ~ a ~ 03' 1. Article Adtlressed to: D. Is delivery adtlress diRerent born item 1? Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ? No Leander Glover, Jr. 815 Cox Lane t Cutchogue, NY 11935 3. Service Type rtified Mail ? Express Mail Registered ? Retum Receipt for Merchandise ? Insured Mail ? C.O.D. 4. Res[dctetl Delivery? (Extra Fee) ? yes 2. Article Number (lYans/er /rom sarvke laben 7004 251 005 2376 9553 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 10258502-M-1540 I I I ~ N,,,~~s ` I ~ i~~ _ ~ r r?' i tP - tLEVAI;~?N ~--F~.i' 1 r_ ' '_:IBI rl,~ ,.r) i ' ter::' n.~iiF ~ ~ Rf?VCl L 1 rF i ~R'!I) Alrf ILA i Nr, +14 , - ~ 1N_ _ _ ~ RE~~ ~I,RB RifY~S ,q, ,L _ _ _ iii 4~ ~ J Y.l_~ ~ ~ ,3 3~ ~ _ _ _ . _ - - _ - , f~ 1 ~ - _ i - r .tom. t-.- - ~ F . bl7c, r - . ~ - - , i . _ ~ . , . . ~ _ ~ _ r,~ - . ~ c6. } F't. I[.C`i 1.,+~'. (r h~..,~ t. ~i •t~ ~ ~itT ',c% KTG.+, ~ t.,,. ~ ~ j. _.T ,F , fi r `N ~ {\7 ~ s , - - - i . i ~ ~ , ~y r 5. , t C ,~.w.~. ' qtr 7 ~ =l: ~ ~ r fix ri,~5 ~ e i' ~ r ."s-!.~--'j"G.L!1_ `.S.L r } r i y = - ~r ~ x 3^C'.r ~.:r.~ ~'j r- ~ SS ,:r e h: 4,,x;4 - i'%~7,{J 1 ~ N7 P+ { , ~ w , ~ r k;-. r fit. 3i~ .,::.x=~;~ i ' ..~1, r'~ , ~ ~ , 1 f ~ ~ ~ - , - _ 4 _ _ ~ , K~ ~~1cv M ~t I ~ ~ IIII , - - - f ~E ~ 1 f.~ ; ~ 12.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ yi;~, ~ ~ ' . ' _ z f r~ T , , 't > f 1 . `f 1 I ~ ~ _ , x~ ~ , L ~ . ~ _ _ , I N&~;i~~ t+:'~' 1'~t~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ - ~ .J L.FI F~- r, ~ X ~ 1 \ ~ 4~ j n~ ~~~i~~ #I tEl~ ~'~~~.2~~r~ _,i ~ l~ C' ci:i;.~ ~ r,~'r~ ~ .z 1 , ~t~ '+I~ _ F ~ ~ I ~ T A, l I'ti} ~ ~ ~ fl I ~''~1,~ ~x i ~ - i ~ t' I ~ - --~L;~ ~ - ~ - 1\~ ~ fir; ~ ~r~ ~ i ~i , R ~ kf;N; i~ .il , .I. , , E i` I C.~.;~ ~ "';t ' ;:r - ~ I K. ! ; i`'-Lfi~~C It li I ~ f`~ _ : ~ _i ~:r M 1 i 1~ - - .,..t~-^.-°~ - ,.~z t _ _ i r..'~ C ~ i M A r_--- - - ~ { , J f'~' ~~LK'7 ; . y ~~~t iri _ ~ •z iT_T NIr,L Af--~''VE t - I ~ ~ , s4k , I`} ; `L c",.A4~C - ! 4 I f a- 3:~ ,'N,!a i ~ r~i I t~ , ~;A~t -T."'~y}~'.'"''..""'-.--° ~ Cl. ~L ice}-~-~ G ti %I '7~''`~. i'~ , 'PdTf- ~`ym r:. s t-, 7~ ~ ~ F'f>.R1:11}~y - 4i _ /'Y\r ~ '~,,i'~'""~ f si ~ yy , ~ r r f } r - i r ` - - - - - I ~j IrJ ~ het yY t " 1 +~°"5',~`l L _ ~ h7 ~ ~-S~ - E ~.M...w.,.ag...~..,..,,~ , c:' if ' . - rtit _ a,h A ,r 1 a '-'~y _ . ,..t ~ \ _ - ~4, Tit r, , _ ~ I ~ ~Y ~ , ;4Y;;,r%s 1 ~ ~ Nor; ~ 1 ~~_...33 f pp}} ' tarp+`~ . ; .,..~.l~;~F~1-i~.E,~ b,. ii'~ ^a/ AY ! ~v~.r ~ r.~ ~;ur",~ ~ . f - k~~~~ ~ ~ r,~~ ~r ~ ~ n. ':f. ~tiM7w~ I. ,a/'.. ~fi ~.+I. r. t• \ '•1 V -~,iTr~~4 i L~~ b~ (,I \ _ ~lkx.e,,~tt `:1 ~ ,-.-.=i-.=t-, hfTGti,~S 9 ~,S - st,. w ~ ~ ?F.r !ii.~+ ~td3Gr-t2.a~ ~ - :x----° N'G,I'7 ~ - - . , r . ~._u - . _ - - _ - ~ ~ I ~ - _t - F ; I r i ; i ~=1 ~ ~ , ~ _ ' 'F . - I r <i ,r, N; ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - -;Y F E~ i~'L-NCE ~v ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,=r-,v - i,E ~FrEr ~r-~; I`~I _ ~ , , ~I i 6~fiolk Coromty laepartmeat of Health $eMoe~ Npp~oval [or Cron . QF,l;ae ~ ; Referona NaC -Ck'J ~ _ . ~ ~ ' i I oJect~ ~J~ I S ~~%l LOCATION ~o~F~~c ~ ~ 5~ JOSHUA Y. HORTON ~~ry~ JAMES A. RICHTER, R.~ SUPERVISOR ~ ENGINEER TOWN FIALL - 53095 MAIN AOAD ~ ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516) - 765 - 1366 y~~1 ~~a' Tel. (516) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER 1. ; ; TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ' Jerilyn B. Woodhouse February 24, 2005 Chairperson -Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Re: Stanley Malon Site Plan Southold, New York 11971 State Route 25, Cutchogue, NY SCTM 1000-97-05-4.5 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the Site Plan and the State DOT Curb Cut Permit Plans for the above referenced project. The office of Harold E. Gebhard, RA has prepared this Site Plan and the latest revision date indicated on the drawing is March 16, 2005. The State Curb Cut Permit Plan is dated December 24,2004. Please note that the proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities and grading of this site will be greater than one (1) acre in area. [This would include the new curb cuts and drainage areas as well as the parking areas and the proposed building envelope.] This project will require coverage from NYS Department of Environmental Protection (DEC) under the Phase I I State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Program. The Developer must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm-water Runoff from Construction Activity (GP-02-01) prior to the initiation of construction activities. My review of this site plan is as follows: 1. Drainage calculations have been amended to comply with Town Code and the proposed drainage design, including the Swale located along the northerly Property line, is considered satisfactory. 2. The proposed future cross over access to the westerly property has been shown to include new landscaping. A gap in the spacing of the proposed white pines should be required. It is recommended that new curbing and asphalt pavement be constructed up to and terminate at the Property Line. 3. Some of the final grade elevations for curbing and pavement areas are indicated to be higher than existing grade. These areas shall require compaction rates to meet minimum industry standards to prevent differential settlement from occurring. The project engineer shall provide certification of compaction rates where required or deemed necessary during the construction phase of the project. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. Sinc rely, Ja s A. Rich r, R.A. CC: Peter Harris, (Superintendent of High Michael J. Verity, (Chief Building Inspector) • • o~gUFFO(,~co JOSHUA Y. HORTON ~ JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD ,~j. ~ TOWN OF ONGOI DEERYORK 11971 Fax. (std-7es-1366 o~~y~~ ~~pl~ TeLtsle~-7es-uao OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse March 22, 2005 Chairperson -Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Re: Stanley Malon Site Plan Southold, New York 11971 State Route 25, Cutchogue, NY SCTM 1000-97-05-4.5 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the Site Plan and the State DOT Curb Cut Permit Plans for the above referenced project. The office of Harold E. Gebhard, RA has prepared this Site Plan and the latest revision date indicated on the drawing is March 16, 2005. The State Curb Cut Permit Plan is dated December 24,2004. Please note that the proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities and grading of this site will be greater than one (1) acre in area. [This would include the new curb cuts and drainage areas as well as the parking areas and the proposed building envelope.] This project will require coverage from NYS Department of Environmental Protection (DEC) under the Phase I I State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Program. The Developer must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm-water Runoff from Construction Activity (GP-02-01) prior to the initiation of construction activities. My review of this site plan is as follows: 1. Drainage calculations have been amended to comply with Town Code and the proposed drainage design, including the Swale located along the northerly Property line, is considered satisfactory. 2. The proposed future cross over access to the westerly property has been shown to include new landscaping. A gap in the spacing of the proposed white pines should be required. It is recommended that new curbing and asphalt pavement be constructed up to and terminate at the Property Line. 3. Some of the final grade elevations for curbing and pavement areas are indicated to be higher than existing grade. These areas shall require compaction rates to meet minimum industry standards to prevent differential settlement from occurring. The project engineer shall provide certification of compaction rates where required or deemed necessary during the construction phase of the project. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. rely, mes A. is er, R.A. Pr!C,R 2 5 2005 CC: Peter Harris, (Superintendent of ig ays) Michael J. Verity, (Chief Building Spector) • \\`~j PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary March 21, 2005 BY CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Re: Proposed Site Plan for Stanley Malon Commercial Project Located 83.35' w/o Cox Lane, on the n/s/o NYS Route 25 in Cutchogue SCTM #1000-97-5-4.5 Zone B: General Business District Dear Neighbor: I represent Stanley Malon with regard to his property located on NYS Route 25 west of Cox Lane. He has submitted a site plan for a new 18,112 sq. ft. commercial ,center, a copy of which is enclosed. The hearing on this matter has been scheduled for Monday, April 11, 2005 at 6:15 p.m. at Southold Town Hall. If you have any questions, or you wish to support this application, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very-truly yours, ~ _-Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr Encls. PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 March 17, 2005 Mr. Bruno Semon Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Stanley Malon, Cutchogue, NY Site Plan Dear Mr. Semon: Enclosed please find the following plans for the above referenced project: 1. SP-1 Dated 12/11/03 Revised 3/16/05 2. SP-2 Dated 12/11/03 Revised 3/16/05 3. NYSDOT-1 Dated 12/22/03 Revised 1/14/05 4. A-1 Dated 3/16/05 5. A-2 Dated 3/16/05 6. A-3 Dated 3/16/05 7. A-4 Dated 3/16/05 8. A-5 Dated 3/16/05 9. A-6 Dated 3/16/05 10. A-7 Dated 3/16/05 11. A-8 Dated 3/16/05 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very trul ours, ' J: Patricia C. Moore PCM/vc Enclosures MAR 1 ~ • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~~OF ~~V jy0 P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~Q l0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS N ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G ~ aO 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~O GEORGE D. SOLOMON lyC (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 766-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 16, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Malon Commercial Center 32845 NYS 25, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Mrs. Moore: On February 17, 2005 we received revised site plans for the above project and immediately forwarded them to Jamie Richter, Southold Town Engineering Inspector for his review. Mr. Richter informed Mr. Gebhart, the Project Architect, that the current revised site plan does not meet the minimum Town drainage standards. I had several telephone conversations with you in late February during which we discussed the same. In addition, you were reminded at the March 14 Planning Board Work Session of the situation. Until we receive a minimum of four revised site plans or updated information with all the changes as discussed, Mr. Richter is unable to issue his final comments. As I am sure you wish to finalize this project at the scheduled Public Hearing on April 11, 2005, please avoid any further delay by expediting the required information to this office. If there are any questions you can contact us at 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respe ully rs, i Bru Io Se Senior Site Plan Reviewer cc: Planning Board Town Engineering Inspector Subject - 1000-097.00-05.00-004.005 1000-97-6-4 Cutchogue-New Suffolk Historical Council ~ P.O. Box 714 Cutchogue, NY 11935 1000-97-5-2.1 Leander Glover, Jr. 815 Cox Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 1000-97-5-3 Daniel A. Kaelin, II ? 54 Tuthill Lane Riverhead, NY 11901 1000-97-5-4.7 WMS Realtv Inc. 6 Main Avenue ~ Garden City, NY 11530 1000-97-5-4.2 Daniel A. Kaelin, II and Patricia Kaelin 54 Tuthill Lane Riverhead, NY 11901 r MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~~OF SOUjyo P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~Q l0 Southold, NY 11971 Chair ~ # OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS N ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G ~ ~O 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~~l (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D. SOLOMON '~CUUt~'I ,~c~` Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 15, 2005 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Stanley Malon Commercial Project Located 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane, on the n/s/o NYS Route 25, known as 32845 NYS Route 25, in Cutchogue SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5 Zone: B, General Business District Dear Ms. Moore: The final public hearing regarding the maps for the above-referenced site plan has been scheduled for Monday, April 11, 2005, at 6:15 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex (2nd Floor, North Fork Bank). Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Fridav,"April 8, 2005. The sinn needs to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Encl. . , • • ~3 ~s PATRICIA C. MOORS - Attorney at Law ~ ` ~ _ ~ . 51020 Maio Road Southold, New York 11971 20Q5 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (63l) 765-4643 t 1 March 3, 2005 Bruno Semon Southold Town Planning Board By Hand Re: Cross Easement Malon Development 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Bruno: With regard to the northerly cross easement, as you recall the neighbor, Cutchogue Medical Center, and I spoke about the Town's request for a formalized (recorded) cross easement between the two properties. We have shown the cross easement which we will build out as proposed at the northwest side of our property on our site plan and we will accept a condition that the northerly cross easement be provided. I will also have my client execute a continuing offer for this northerly cross easement. However, I can not compel the neighbor to relocate the easement. The neighbor (and all the other lots in this commercial subdivision) have a recorded easement. The easement is 10 feet off the road and shown on the original subdivision map. As the individual parcels are reviewed by the Planning Board, and the relocation is deemed appropriate, the owners could be persuaded to relocate the cross easement, however, until the other parcels come before the Board for an amended site plan approval we must await their cooperation. The neighbor was willing to reserve his decision until the tenants on the Malon property are determined through binding leases. The building must first be built, tenants selected, and then we are in a position to discuss the opening of the northwest cross easement on the neighbor's property. We can not provide a schedule for occupancy to prospective tenants until we have a final site plan approval. Enclosed is a copy of the original Highway Work Permit (#10- 04-0635) and plan. ry tr y yours, Pa ici C. Moore FROM ~ PHIXJE NO. ~ Mar. 03 2005 09:45RM P1 Crnss Easement Stanley TVialon SCTMi~1000-9'7-5-4.5 1 Stanley Melon, on behalf of myself and my wife, Christine Melon hereby make a continuing offer t0 relocate the cross easetnent fmm the southwest side of my property w the northwest side of my property as shown on a site plan arepared by Harold fi. Gebhard Architect dated 12-I1-03 Semon, Bruno To: Planning Board Members and Staff Subject: FW: Update on Malon Site Plan H i, FYI Jamie called to inform me that the site plan is still not compliant with Town codes as indicated in the comments from 2003. It appears from the email below that the Architect and agent will expedite this revised site plan. So this is still not ready to be endorsed by the Planning Board at the final hearing and may be conditional pending the receipt of the revision. No need to respond on this email, I just want to keep everybody informed. Thanks Bruno -----Original Message----- From: Richter, Jamie Sent: Tuesday, March Ol, 2005 11:04 AM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: Malon Site Plan Bruno I spoke to both Pat Moore and Harold Gebhard regarding the items we talked about earlier. Harold will look into the matter and get back to me later today or tomorrow morning. He will try to expedite the modifications required by my office and revise the plan. I will wait to receive the changes so that I can give you a final OK on the site plan. Jamie 1 PERM.2p (e7s3) ST~F NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSF~tTION HIGHWAI~f-~'IK666iK PERMIT ,t r C 550700 ~ Permit No.: 1 O'O4- O 6~3 Permit Fee: 175.90 Insurance Fee:125,90 10j01j2005 Project Identification No.: Total Recei~9)801$ 8229 Expiration Date: Check or M.O. No.: ~ ~ 0.00 SH No.: Deposit Rec. for $ ~ ~ Check or M.O. No.: 0.00 Dated: 'PerrtHR~~INE 6 STANLEY NRLON Estimated Cost of6YB'1A9d9'erformed in the State Right-of-Way $ 264 IIXTON AVENUE 20000,00) Chargeable to Bond No.: LINOENNURST, XY 11751 or Undertaking on File: att: 516-612-0796 Billing Address: (Complete It different from above) ~ Return of Deposit Made Payable to: (Complete it different from Permittee) Under the provisions of the Higghwayy Law or Vehicle & Traffic Law permission is hereb qgrant d t the r IItt`` lo' TO CONSTRUCT b PERNRNTLY NRINTAIN CONMERCIRL ACCESS, SIDEWRLK b CURB ON THE NORTH SI~E OF IRYS RTE. tp~ ~TW~RN dMS 15 ]3-15]4, ANO OTHER INCIOENTRI WORK AS PER ATTRCNED PLRNS d SPECS. ALL WORK SHRII BE TO THE SRTISFRCTION OF THE RES. ENBINEER. SEE ATTRCHEO SPECIRL PROVISIONS-RLL WORK SNALL BE OONE IN ACCORORNCf WITH APPROVED PLRNS OR RSOBE. MRINTEN RNCE 6 PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC S'RAII BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF PERMITTEE AT RLL TINES UNTIL COMPLETION OF Rll WORK ETC. THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC. ANYONE WORKING IN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT-CF-LVAY IS REQUIRED TO WEAR HIGH VISIBILITY APPAREL (ORANGE/YELLOW)RND HARD HAT. SUFFOLK SOUTNOlO 25 County - Municipality - Route H - as set forth and represented in the attached application at the particular location or area, or over the routes as stated therein, if required; and pursuant to the conditions and regulations general or special, and methods of performing work, if any; all of which are-.set forth in the application and form of this permit. Dat,,,,,,~~~{{{~~~ggqqqqU ppyyAUBE, N.Y. Datg~~~$ Commission of ransportati SMITH . By: IMPOflTANT THIS PERMIT, WITH APPLICATION AND D A ING (OR COPIES THEREOF) ATTACHED SHALL B PLACED IN T H OF THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE ANY WORK BEGINS. THE HIGHW WORK PERMIT SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE SITE URING CON T TION. BEFORE WORK IS STARTED AND UPON I COMPLETION, THE PERMITTEE ABSOLU LY MUST NOTIFY THE RES ENGINEER, ~ws-~'uGfi'a-y~ s ~a-~1 UPON COMPLETION OF WORK AUTHORIZED, THE FOLLOWING WILL BE COMPLETED, SIGNED BY THE PERMITTEE AND DELIVERED TO THE RESIDENT ENGINEER. Work authorized by this permit has been completed. Refund of depbsit or return/release of bond is requested. DATE PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT (II Any) Work authorized by this permit has been satisfactorily completed and is accepted. Reverse side of this form must be completed. ? Refund of Deposit is authorized ? Return of Bond is authorized ? Amount charged against Bond may be released ? Retain Bond for future permits ? Other DATE RESIDENT ENGINEER regional Office will forward this form to the Main Office with the appropriate box checked. ? Permit closed ? Bond returned/released ? Refund of Guarantee Deposit on this permit is authorized ? Oth:;r DATE REGIONAL TRAFFlC ENGINEER The issuing authority rescni~s the right to suspend or revoke this permit, at its discretion without a hearing or the necessity of showing cause, either before or during the operations authorized. The Permittee evil) cause an approved copy of the application to be and remain attached hereto until all work under the permit is satisfactorily completed, in accordance with the terms of the attached application. All damaged or disturbed areas resulting from work performed pursuant to this permit will be repaired to the satisfaction of the Department of Transportation. ' Upon completion of the work within the state highway right-of-way, authorized by the work permit, the person, firm, corporations, •nicipality, or state department or agency, and his or its successors in Interest, shall be responsible for the maintenance and `ouch work or portion of such work as set forth within the terms and conditions of tho work permit. o~OgUFFO(,~c Pf~ o~ o~~ N Z Town Hall, 53095 Main Road O ~ ~ Fax (631) 765-9502 P.O. Box 1179 y~ol ~aO~ Telephone (631)765-1802 Southold, New York 11971-0959 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson FROM: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector DATE: February 18, 2005 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Stanley Malon Commercial Center Location: 32845 Main Road, CutchoQUe SCTM# 1000 -Section 97- Block 5 -Lot 4.5 Date: December 22, 2003 Revised Date: January 14, 2005 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE Commercial Center (Retail and Office Suace) IS A PERMITTED USE IN THIS B DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. See ZBA Appl. No. 5383 r r ~ Michael J. Verity Chie£Building Inspector PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary February 17, 2005 Ms. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Bruno (BY HAND) Re: Stanley Malon 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Bruno: ~ S Enclosed please find sets of the final version of site plan. The enclosed contains: A. DOT approved plan (NYSDOT 1) permit in your file B. SP-1 with the drainage swale previously reviewed by the Town Engineer and Health Department details. Health Department approved stamped plan in your file. C. SP-2 (landscape plan, lighting, and other details) D. A-1 through A-7 are the elevations & construction details These plans are ready for certification by Mike and a hearing. I would ask that this plan be placed on the hearing calender for final site plan approval. Thank you. Very tntly~yours, Patricia C. MooYe cc: Mrs. Malon PCM/mm F E B 1 7 X005 * ~ ~ PATRICIA C. MOORS Aaorney at Law 51020 Mair. Road Seu[hold, New York 11971 Tel: (631} 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4tia3 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET The panes comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information frcm Patricia C. Mocre. This information is intended solely for use by the individual entity named as the recipient hereof. If ycu are not t°,e intended recipient, be a~.•are that any disclosure, copying, distribetion, or use of the contents of this transrission is prohibited. If ycu have received this transmission ir. error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange to retrieve this transnissicn at no cost to you. TOTAL NUP19Ei; OF PAGES_NCLU'DING COVER SHEET IF TRANSDLISSION IS FAULTY OR INCUMPLET;;, PLEASE CAL,T nA~K RS SUUN AS POSSIBLE- CLIENT NF.ME: OPERATOR: r 6i ~-v; ~ / Crn % rrc/ l c-zip/ j J'L.t -F ' i2G C~ ~•d E494 S9L TE9 aot,},}p mad a.aooW dZ0°EO SO bT 9aB i ~ P~ gs PATRICIA C. bi00RE Attorney at Law 5 i O2U Main Road Southold. N.Y. 11952 TeI:(631)?65-4330 Fax:(63l) 765-4643 s February 11, 2005 Ms. Jetri Woodhouse. Chairwoman and Southold Town Planning IIoard P.O. Boz 1179 Southold,NY 11971 (BY FAX) Re: Stanley Malon 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: This application has been unreasonably delayed in being set For a public hearing. Unlike most of the site plans set for public hearing on your calender, we have in hand both the Health Department and DOT approvals. These aporovals are in vour file. On November 9, 2004 this board declared themselves lead agency and by December 9, 2004 SEQR.A was complete. Delays were caused by diagreement between the Town and the DOT on the appropriate~curb cut. That issue was resolved in December and by January 20, 2005 the DOT permit was in your file. My client has been exceedi ngly cooperative with all of [he Town's demands; my client designed mitigation measures to address drainage problems caused by others, including the Town, The only issue remaining is to complete Architectural Review for the second time. The elevations of the building were reviewed and approved by the ARC two yeazs ago, unfortunately the Town record of the ARC meeting does not contain all the materials personally shown at the meeting. Minor questions of the building light fixtures, and other insignificant points were left open. We are merely waiting for notice of the next meeting of the ARC, I have all the materials in a box and a written list from the architect. We advised you in December that we had the opportunity to secure a very desirable tenant- howevermonths are going by without a hearing. I would ask that this site plan be placed on the hearing calender for final site plan approval Very truly yours, r_.~.- i - Patricia C. Moore cc: Mrs. Malon PCMImm t•d Eb9b S9L iE9 ao?,1}0 road a~ooW dBS~EO SD II 9a~ PATRICIA C. MOORS .4ttomey ac Law S 1020 Main Road Southold,NcwYork 1:9?1 Tel: (631 ?65.4330 Fax: (631) ?65-0643 February 7, 2005 Mr. Bruno Sinone Southold Town Punning Board Southold fawn Hall PO Box 1179 Sou hold, D11' 11971 Re: N_alon Dear Bruno, Enclosed is the original Health Department approved site plan. Also enclosed is a letter from the architect addressing the Architectural Review Board s issues. I have the material samules at my office for the Architectural Review Board meeting. Please advise the date of the Architectural Review Board meeting. It is my understanding that this site plan is ready for a public hearing. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr enclosure Z•d E494 SBL iE9 aoi,},}0 mv~ a~ooW dE0~E0 SO bS 9ad HAROLD E. GEBHARD 363 NDRTH WELLWOOD AVE. LNDENHUR5t NY 11757 (831) 2263708 FAX (831) 2263088 ~ ARCHITECT February 4, 20D5 Ms. Patricia Moore -Attorney 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Malon Project -Cutchogue, New York Dear Pat: Pursuant to your request to the Architectural Review Board, here are the following: • Site plans -completed, revised as per Planning, Zoning, New work State DOT and Health Dept. • Type of building construdlon, use, etc. is shown on plan. • Floor plans included. • Elevations included. • Samples of materials and color are included • Roof shingles are to be Century Seal King 25 - Charcoal Brown • Brick and CertainTeed Weatherboard Siding -Tar, • Windows are to be Anderson, white permashield • Trim to be Fypon, white • Heating, ventilation and air conditioning is to tie a combination of gas fired For heating and electric for ventilation and air conditioning. • There will be no roof mounted mechanical equipment. • All masonry material will be as per brick sample enclosed. • There will be no awnings, canopies or tents. PVC planter boxes will be by "Flower Framers Co." , color to be white. Trellis front and back will be constructed of 2 X S & 2X10, primed and finish painted white. • Photos are included. • Signage is shown on site plan, all materials to match building. Th Zoning Bo rd of Ap eals has a copy of the rendering. If you should require any fu her assist ce, ple do not hesitate to contact this office. Y~ urs truly, ,s'' i .~-.-e.--.~ old E. Ge Ar ilea E'd E494 S9L iE9 ~~?dd0 mv~ a~ooW dE0~E0 50 bT 9ad g~ PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney a[ Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 February 7, 2005 Mr. Bruno Simone Southold Town Planning Board ~ ~ _ C Southold Town Hall ~ J "f PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Malon Dear Bruno, Enclosed is the original Health Department approved site plan. Also enclosed is a letter from the architect addressing the Architectural Review Board's issues. I have the material samples at my office for the Architectural Review Board meeting. Please advise the date of the Architectural Review Board meeting. It is my understanding that this site plan is ready for a public hearing. Very.-trimly yours, _ ~l i~ ~-Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr enclosure -1 r_.. lz-ll-a3 r~-; ~ 5 w~ c. ¢ ~ ~fc~„~- _J • HAROLD E. GEBHARD 363 NORTH WELLWOOD AUE. LINDENHURST, NY 11757 (631) 226,3708 FAX (631) 226J088 ARCHITECT February 4, 2005 Ms. Patricia Moore -Attorney 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Malon Project -Cutchogue, New York Dear Pat: Pursuant to your request to the Architectural Review Board, here are the following: • Site plans -completed, revised as per Planning, Zoning, New York State DOT and Flealth Dept. • Type of building construction, use, etc. is shown on plan. • Floor plans included. Elevations included. • Samples of materials and color are included: • Roof shingles are to be Century Seal King 25 -Charcoal Brown • Brick and CertainTeed Weatherboard Siding -Tan • Windows are to be Anderson, white permashield • Trim to be Fypon, white • Heating, ventilation and air conditioning is to be a combination of gas fired For heating and electric for ventilation and air conditioning. • There will be no roof mounted mechanical equipment. • All masonry material will be as per brick sample enclosed. • There will be no awnings, canopies or tents. PVC planter boxes will be by "Flower Framers Co." , color to be white. Trellis front and back will be constructed of 2 X 8 & 2X10, primed and finish painted white. • Photos are included. • Signage is shown on site plan, all materials to match building. Th Zoning Bo rd of Ap eals has a copy of the rendering, If you should require any fu er assist ce, ple a do not hesitate to contact this office. Y urs truly, old E. Ge har Ar itect F~ ~ _ ~~z~a7/?~7~~, ~ ~ ~s~"t`I'_~ ° zr t~~~f~:}r~ r~i~~0c:}~rt7~~~e.. . - ~ ~ ~~i - r y _ 7~{(~ !'l/irrt<tfe' FIOII'Pl'f~l~.i' t'A. ~ •I YW~ ACCt'SSO?"y~ ~GS.r t,., ~r,y ~ ~ ` ~ . ~ ¦ -~fN' I ~ • Calibrated to deliver the correct ~ - ~ _ ~ aniottnt o{ N'dter ever}' [iene ~ ~ . . . Pre-assembled parts ready for ~ , ~ ' on-site inscdjation u~' J - Saves you time from hand- - - waterlog - an immediate mtd inuneasur:d>Ic s:rvings ~ ' • Easily attaches co water source ~ • ~ ~ • (i.e. indoor or outdoor faucer) ~ - r~ Dripline ~ - ;:~idCr Mows fhro Ugh Orlp~ine Find s ~ GUile tl r i fht~ leng of the iowertror !u be m~rn sY. OR Create your own ?.25 per K. of flower6ex Irrigation System for all your gardening Deeds starting at 300.00 Complete System to Water - L~1~~ 10f~8y3 Ffougrr Framers Flowerborccs ~q . r,; vcle~n L'orltaine/s TilnelS Easy Dial 31~~~$~~ •Flu~rcr 6erls Adjustment Timer Lawn Meas xs (waters up to 3 times a day) ~ MICRO-DRIPPERS IRRIGATE 135.50 SOIL EVENLY EVERY 6" ~ _ _ . ~ et I ~ CUSTOM 3" X 3" " ~ = I ~ ! STAINLESS STEEL g,. BRACKET- : ~ _ ORDER 1,5" LAG BOLT ~ - ~ x ' • ~ ~ FOR DECK PICKET t _ _ [ ~ 8.5" WATER FLOWS BUILLIN, THROUGH DRIPLtNE HIGH-FLOW ALONG BOX BOTTOM DRAINAGE WATER FEED SUPPLYING OVERHEAD SYSTEM LINE MICRO-DRIPPERS -„~-.:r ~1!un J5 :513321-7G01 W.WW. ffOWEI"(I"2177Bf S. CO ll7 O$UFFl7(~C ~ MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE C y~ Southold, NY 11971 x Chair N OFFICE LOCATION: W • 'F Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~y-lyol 54375 State Route 25 KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY GEORGE D. SOLOMON Telephone: 631 786-1838 Fax: 831 786-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 4, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mrs. Moore: Re: Stanley Mallon Building 32845 Main Road. Cutchogtle SCTM #1000-97-5-4.5 Zone B 1 T(h~e, above site plan application was reviewed at the Architectural Review Committee (/-11CC) meeting held on January 25, 2005. A copy of the meeting minutes is enclosed. Please review the pertinent comments and inform us in writing if you are in agreement with the conditions. In addition, if required, please modify the site/construction plan, and submit the revisions to the Planning Board. If there are any questions, please contact me, at (631) 765-1938 ext. 229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respe fully urs, Bru o Se on Senior Site Plan Reviewer encs: ARC minutes checklist MATT-A-MAR BY THE BAY (First Street -New Suffolk) SCTM# 1000-122-6- 29.3) Moved by Ron McGreevy and seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting visual representation of the boat racks and information about the exterior lighting and signage. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. HILDRETHS DEPARTMENT STORE (Main Road -Mattituck) SCTM#1000-122- 6-29.3 Moved by Herbert Ernest and seconded by Ron McGreevy, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting complete elevations to agree with the site plan, colors, roof shingle material as well as the other information on the ARC checklist. The applicant is asked to consider treatments to break up the expanse of the roofs, possibly dormers as on the buildings to the west. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. HELLENIC SNACKBAR (Main Road -East Marion) SCTM#1000-35-2-14) Moved by Herbert Ernest and seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting the information on the ARC checklist. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. DAVID ROSE PERENNIALS (5645 Aldrich Lane - Mattituck. SCTM#1000-120-3- 11.12 Moved by Herbert Ernest and seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE. the SIGNAGE as submitted. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recission of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. STANLEY MALLON BUILDING (32845 Main Road - Cutchogue) SCTM#1000- 97-5-4.5 , J®~ Moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Herbert Ernest, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting a response to the Committee's comments of June 3, 2003 and the items on the ARC checklist. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. The meeting adjourned at 5:05 p.m. `~~l,l,lt ~-C.1 ~1 Robert W. Keith Secretary. • RECONAIENDED CHECKLIST FOR 1RCHITECTURAL REVIEW COlt-ZMITTEE After the Planning Board star-notifies you in writing that your application is acceptable, the relevant information on the check list below should be submitted to the Committee, all at one tune, and tlu ough the Planning Board staff. If you wish to have your samples returned, please note this on tha envalope. 1. Site Plan 2. Floor plans, drawr. to scale to 1 `preferred) by a licensed arcltitect or engureer (design professional) showing the type of construction, proposed occupancy or use and the location of fire protection walls. 3. Elevation drawings to scale (also to 1' } of all sides of each building prepared by a design professional. =t. 11ce typa and color of Qle ite~?i that follows ara to be shown on tha drawings. Please include samples where appropriate. r Roofing ~ Siding Windows, doors and Crim Exterior heatind'cooling equipment such as heat pumps and au- conditioning equipment. Also show their locations. Roef mounted c~nechanical equipment. Roof and sidcw;Jl penetrations for plumbing and mechanical equipment. .Uso indicate the theu- locations and material. R4asonrv material for cltinneys or accent walls. Also provide samples or photographs. Ornamentation, awiungs, canopies or tents. Also provide details and stele.. (I~, Bs. ~ P~ ~ Fig SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE _ January 25, 2005 j ~ u _ The ARC met at the Town Hall Annex at 4:00 p.m. t' Members present were ~pN 2 7 2005 Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman ~ i Herbert Ernest, Southold Ronald McGreevy, Mattituck Robert Keith, Mattituck Also present were Frank and Chris Kestler for his dental office, Gwendolen Croocock of the Suffolk Times, and Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff. Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Herbert Ernest, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of January 4, 2005, Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. FRANCIS KESTLER DENTAL OFFICE (Main Road at Pacifc Street -Mattituck) SCTM# 1000-142-2-16 Upon learning that handicap ramp would be finished to match the house trim or be left natural and reviewing the lighting fixtures, it was moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Herbert Ernest to ACCEPT the FULFILLMENT of the prior CONDITIONS wiin the FINAL CONDITION that the top and bottoms of the ramp balustrades be,~overed Vote of the Committee: ayes all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recission of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing a Certificate of Occupancy. - -5OUTI~OLD FLOOR COVERING (46255 North Road -Southold). SCTM# 1000- - 55-2-18.1 Moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Ronald McGreevy, it was RESOLVED to ACCEPT FULFILLMENT of those CONDITIONS pertaining to exterior materials and colors, roof penetrations and mechanical equipment provided a location of the latter on the east elevation is at least 80' north of the south property line. The CONDITIIONS pertaining to: 1) signage awaits information about material and lighting and 2) exterior lighting awaits catalogue cuts. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recission of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing a Certificate of Occupancy. F~ STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAU PPAUGE, N.Y. 1 1 788-55 1 8 _ SUBIMAL CXAKRABORTI, P.E. JOSEPX H. BOARDMAN REGIONAL DIRECTOR -~-_GoMxrtBBf~RER.1 f January 14, 2005 Mr. Hazold E. Gebhazd, Architect ` 363 North Wellwood Ave. ~ Lindenhurst, Ny 11757 ~i J Your December 24. 004 Submission Commercial Proiect for Stanley Malon Site Plans Dated 12/22/03, Last Revision 12/24/04 Route 25, CutchoQUe SCTM 100-97-5-4.5 Our Case No. 03-336P Dear Mr. Gebhard: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Discussions with Town of Southold personnel indicate it may be beneficial to note future cross access to the adjacent pazcel to the east as well. The submitted plans do not address this issue and we recommend that it be addressed. Site plan approval for highway work permit issuance is contingent upon our receipt of all of the following items within six (6) months of the date of this letter and no further revisions are made to the plans once we approve them. If the Highway Work Permit will be secured by anyone other than the property owner, i.e. contractor, the applicant must provide a signed letter from the property o~imer stating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the property owner in this matter. The letter must also include the property owner's mailing address and telephone number. Kindly submit four sets of the revised plans, permit fee and surety bond (sample enclosed). It is also mandatory that protective liability insurance be provided by the permittee. This must be accomplished by submitting a completed Perm 17, Certificate of Insurance, in accordance with Option A (form enclosed), or by submitting the fee specified below to be covered under the NYSDOT Blanket Policy. Also enclosed is a Highway Work Permit Application to be completed and returned to us. The application, completed Perm 17 and the Surety Bond must be secured by the same party. All checks issued to the State of New York must show a Federal Identification Number. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): $550.00 Bond Amount:$20,000.00 Insurance Fee: $175.00 or Perm 17 ! • Mr. Harold E. Gebhard January 14,2005 Page 2 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mazk Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, C~;,i~:a By SHAIEk A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachments cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold s. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold JMr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold 5AS:MW:DW Su/,~% PATRI~C. MOORE, ATTORNEY HI LAW ~ 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 ~ ~ TD ~v~ O SUBJECT /1/Lu /c~.-~ 2 J /mss . .T ~,i~ ~,~o,-mow ~l~S /fl/IcGL ~f~P SI~'~P-~G~- ~o , \m SAN 2 . SIGNED ~ - - - ~ i PERM 33m (t/g7) STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PREPARE 3 COPIES HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT APPLICATION POR NON-UTILITY WORK (Photocopies acceptable) 71pplicaUon is hereby made for a highway work permit: / ~1 For Joint application, name end address of Second Applicant below: Mr. Stanley Melon ~~/~S~~N/~ /~~~a,,,~/(~, Name Address 264 Linton Avenue Address city Lindenhurst state NY Zip 11757 aty state_ZJp eral LD. No. or Social Seou~d 'No. ~ fir, ~ e "ev ~tt ~ g~. li t f `vi~tt Applicant Telephone NO. Ts~g~l /a` -o ~9~P ` Contact person in raseotemergency Harold E. Gebhard )~7'I Telephone NO. ofwmadperson 631-226-3708 ~ ~ e RETURN PERMIT T0: (It different from above) RETURN OF DEPOSIT/BOND T0: (Canplem only If diMareM hom penMnee) Name Stanley Melon Name Stanley Melon 264 Linton Avenue 264 Linton Avenue Address ~reu Lindenhurst NY 11757 Lindenhurst NY 11757 city slate- zip Ciry state- Zp 0 t. Estlmated cost of work being pedonned in state highway dghtof-way $ 1 8 r 0 0 0 . 0 0 ~ 9/1/05 10/1/05 2. Anticipated tluration of work: From x7?;, thru t I b~ , to appry to the operation(s) checketl on the revena side. 3. Protective Liability Insurance covered by Policy No. ;expires on ~ 19 W (L 4. A $20.00 tee will be charged for checks relumad by the bank. PROPOSED WORK (Brie) tlescdption): N2W concrete Curbs, sidewalk, curb cuts and aprons ~ along Main State Road, (NYS RT# 25) replace casting and clean Q drainage structure ATTACHED: Plans x Specifirations LOCATION: State Route 2 5 State Highway between Reference Marker 15 7 3 and Reference Marker 1 5 7 4 Southold Suffolk Town of: County of: SEOR REQUIREMENTS: (Check appropdate Item) Exempt Ministedal x Type II EIS or DEIS Lead Agency T O W n O f S O U L it O l d If project is identified to,be ministedal, exempt, or TYPE II, no further action is required. If project is determined to be other than ministedal, exempt, or TYPE II, refer to MA.P.7.72-2, Appendix A SEAR REQUIREMENTS FOR HIGHWAY WORK PERMITS. Acceptance of me reques)~d ertnit subj c s the permittee ~ th§ restri lions, regulations and ohligations stated on Ihls application antl on the penult. ~ January 18, 2005 ~gxxxxx Applicant Signature ~ Date /fY~.- _ Sewnd Applicant Signature te. / /r ~ ~ 19 _ . I_ $~."~a~~.v~ _ K~ .~~4~; cam. PERMIT IS ISSUED CONTINGENT UPON LOCAL REQUIREMENTS BEING SATISFIED. Special Provisions for HWP# ~ 3~j • All permitted activity must be coordinated with the Engineer-in-Chazge (EIC) of NYSDOT Construction Projects D259518, PIN 0041.99 and D259273, PIN 0042.26 to prevent NIPT and future drainage installation conflicts. The EIC of these projects, Mr. Joseph Ludwig, shall be contacted @ (631) 734-7590 prior to commencing any work. • The permittee shall be required to re-locate facilities as directed by the EIC, at their expense, should any conflicts with NYSDOT Construction Projects D259518, PIN 0041.99 and D259273, PIN 0042.26 occur as a result of this permitted installation. PEAM 41~7d 14186) METHOD OF PERFORMING WOflK WITHIN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT DF WAY I. GENERAL CONDITIONS " These conditions end regulations apply to Highway Work Permits authorizing work within the State highway right~of~way for water mains, gas mains, sewer lines and miscellaneous structures. General Conditions apply to telephone end telegraph installations es well es specific conditions on the setting and resetting of pales. Those conditans, and any special Conditions which are added to this form, are enforceable by the Department of Transportation. A, TIME 1, Work under the permit shall he commenced within thirty 1301 days from the date of permit issuance unless a later starting date is approved by the Regional Traffic Engineer. B. REQUIREMENTS - All the current requirements of the following shall apply: Occupational Safety end Health Administration, Federal Department of Labor, Safety and Health Standards129 CFO 1926119101; Part 131, Title 17, New York Cada of flutes end fleAulations, Accommodation of Utilities Within State Right~af~Way; New York State Department of Labor, Industrial Code Aule 23, Protection of Persons Employed in Construction and Demolition Work; Industrial Cade flute 53, Construction, Excavation and Demolition Operations At Or Neer Underground Facilities. Temporary sail erosion end water pollution controls shell he used es required. The final decision on the method of underground installation will be made by the flepional Director Or h12 f0pre5eai8hve. 1. Work Within Pavement and Shoulder Areas a. Installations that cross thepavemant end shoulder area. Wherever practical, all underground installations shall ha placed beneath the pavement and shoulder areas without disturbance to these paved surfaces. 11 boring, Jacking, and Tunneling Methods DESIGN al The location of all excavations ~Ilacking pits, etc.) shall he shown in plan and profile. hl The soil profile and groundwater conditions shall he determined by adequate subsurface exploration. c) The location of all other existing utilities shall he shown. dl Tha construction equipment and procedures to he used shall be described in the permit application. el The design of all excavations, including Around and surface water control where necessary, shall be made available for review by the Department. fl The underground installation shall be'descrihed in detail, i.e. size, length, depth, material, provisions for grouting, etc. gl Pipes shall generally ~be enclosed in sleeves or larger pipes. Small diameter services 12 inch I.O. or smaller) may be placed without cleaving et the discretion of N.Y.S.O.O.T. hl The limits of an open excavation shell not ha closer than 10 feet to the edge of the pavement, unless approved by the Department. Open excavations shell 6e protected with the required controls for~safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the Naw York State tlepartmant of Trensporta~ tion,:Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 'CONSTRUCTION el Grouting operations may he required if surface settlement, loss of soil or voids around the pipe develop. When grout is required, it shell consist of 1 part cement to 2 parts sand, by volume, and sufficient water to produce a Consistency suitable far placing the grout. hl ^Backfill of open excavations shall he es required under 2.1' fl Open Excavation Method 21 Open Excavation Method DESIGN al The location of all pavement crossing by iha open excavation method shall ba shown in plan and profile. hl The soil profile and groundwater conditions shall he determined by adequate subsurface exploration. d The location of all other existing utilities shall be shown dl The design of all excavations, including ground and surface water control where necessary, shall be madeavaiehla for review by the Department. el When requested, the~construdion~equipmam end procedures to be used shall ha described in the permit application. ~ fl Pipe installations shall be done according'to the requirements of the appropriate New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Sheets. The required granular material shall meet the material requirements for Select Granular Fill in the current New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Specifications including addenda. Exceptions will only he allowed ii prior approval is granted by the flapianel Soils Engineer. AI Pavement shall ha saw cuhatterminativn points of pavemen6 replacement. CONSTRUCTION al Pavement and shoulder removal shall be done in a manner that provides for Droper restoration of the replacement section. Straight, vertical cuts of the pavement will he required. Pavement surfaces that become undermined shall he cut back and removed. Alternative repair methods may ha used if prior approval is granted. b) The beckfill material shall be placed end compacted according to the requirements for backfillinp structures, culverts, pipes, conduits and direct burial cebledescrihed in Section 200; Earthwork, New York State Department of Transportation's Specifications, indudinp addenda ' c) Generally, cutY shallhe filled at the end of each working day. With prior approval, steel cover plates may he used. Recessing of these plates may be required. dl' Tempararypavements end shoulders shall he placed as soon as a crossover installation is completed. b. Installations that are longitudinal to the pavement 11 Open Excavation Method •.1~' DESIGN ~ I el Tha location of alb open excavations shall he shown in plan and profile. hl The soil profile and groundwater conditions shall he-0atermined by adequate subsurface exploration. cl The design of all excavations, including Around and surface water control where necessary, shall ba made available for review by the Department. dl The locatioh of ell other existing utilities shall ba-shown. ~ ' e! Pipe installationsshell ha done according to the requirements of the appropriate New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Sheets. The required groOUlar maI0r101 shell meal the malarlYl reQUlfema0lS fOf $BIBLt GraOUar Fill In the CUrrenl NYW YOrk SlaleDeparln100t Of Tr805pOftaI1011 Y Standard $p0C111L8t1pn4, including addenda. Exceptions will only he allowed it prior approval is GrantOd by the Regional Soils Engineer. CONSTRUCTION el Pavement and shoulder removal shall he done in a manner that provides for proper restoration of the replacement section. Stralpht vertical cuts~of the ~pevement wilt hrrequired. Pavemedfaurfaces that became undermined shall ha cut heck end removed. Alternative npaiPmethods maV be usedif prior approval is Granted. b) The beckfill materiel shall he placed end Compacted according to the requirements for backfillinp structures, chlverts,pipes, conduits end direct burlel cable described in Section 200, Earthwork, New York State Department of Transportation i Specifications, including addenda ~ cl Generally, cuts shall he filled at the and of each working day. With prior approval, Steel Lover plates may be used. Recessing of these plates may he required. dl Permanent or temporary pavement shell be placed immediately a5 sections of the total installation are completed to subbase elevation. Gravel surfeced'iRshbdlder areas may he used if prior approval is Granted 21 Boring, Jacking, and Tunneling Methods DESIGN el All the requirements of 8.1. a. 1.1 DESIGN el through pl shall apply. CONSTRUCTION al All the requirements of B.1 a: t.l CONSTRUCTION al and bl shall apply. b) Open excavations shall brpratected with the required rontrols for safety end for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with theNew York State Department'of Transportation, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, cl The requirements of 0.1. h. 1.1 CONSTRUCTION dl shall apply. ' T. Work Outside the Pavement end Shoulder Areas ~ ' a. Open Excavation Method DESIGN al All the requirements of B.1. h. 1.1 DESIGN shall apply. bl Open excavations shall be pmtedOd with the requried controls for safety and for the maintenance end protection of traffic in accordance with 1he~New York State Department of TransDOrtetion, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Oevicea. CONSTRUCTION al The beckfill material shall he placed end compacted accordinG to the requirements for backtillinp structure&, culverts, pipes, conduits and direct tiurial table described in Section 200, Earthwork, New York State Oepartinent of Transportation's Specifications, including addenda. PERM 41~1d 141861 • REVERSE , h. Boring, Jacking, and Tunneling Methods el All the requirements of 8.1. a. 1.1 DESIGN a1 through fl shall apply. bl Open excavations shall 6e protected with the required controls for safety end !or the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New Yark State Department of Trensportetiann, Manual of Uniform Traftic Control Devices. CONSTRUCTION al All the requirements of B. 1. a. 1.1 CONSTAUCTION shall apply. C. SUBBASE, PAVEMENT AND SHOULDER AEOUIREMENTS )including manholes) 1. Suhbase a. The Suhbase course shall be a minimum of 12 inches thick unless otherwise approved. The material shall meet the requirements of current Department of Transportation subbase course item as specified by the Regional Soils Engineer. b. Under the permit, wnstruction which adversely eflects the suhsurlace drainage of the pavement structure shall be corrected by the addition of surface or suhsurlace drains, as required. 2. Pavement end Shoulders e. Permanent The replaced pavement shall be similar to the existing pavement in composition and texture. The selection of the material type and compositon shall he subject to the approval of the flegianal Director or his representative. The limit of pavement replacement shall be such that the replaced pavement is supported by thoroughly compacted subbase material and the pavement is restored to the proper grade, cross~slope and smoothness. When hituminous concrete mixtures are required for the pavement replacement, the layers shell consist of one or a combination of mixture types contained in Table 4011, Composition of Bituminous Plant Mixtures in Section 401 of the New Yark State Department of Transportation's Specification, including addenda. The mixture shall he placed at the proper temperature, without segregation, and compacted thoroughly. When poitland cement concrete mixtures are required for pavement replacement, the mixtures shell consist of either Class C or Class f es contained in Table 5013, Concrete Mixtures in Section 501 of the New York State Department of Transportation's Specifications, including addenda. Class F is a high early strength mixture and should be used when early opening to traffic is desired. The concrete mixtures shall be placed without segregation, then consolidated, finished to the prober elevation, and textured. Curing the concrete pavement shell be in actor dance with one of the methods permitted in Section 502 pertaining to curing. Pavement shoulders, cur65, putters and other incidental features shall be replaced in kind unless otherwise approved by the Regional Director or his representative. h. Temporary Pavement that is replaced Temporarily may be paved with either a hot bituminous concrete mixture mentioned above or a cold bituminous patching mixture. When a cold patching mixture is used it shall consist al aggregate and bituminous material proportioned and mixed in a hituminous mixing plant or rotating paddle abaft pugmill. flagerdlass which patching mixture is used it shall he laid an a prepared foundation and thoroughly compacted. Since cold bituminous patching mixtures ere subject to distortion by traffic, the temporary patch shall be maintained to provide a smooth surface until the pavement is permanently replaced. 3. Manholes Manhole frames and covers shell have sufficient structural adequacy to supPOrt the roadway traffic. The type of manhole frame end cover shall be approved by the Regional Director or his representative. The manhole frame shall he set Ilush with. the surface of the roadway unless otherwise permitted by the flegianal Director or his representative. 0. MAINTENANCE ANO PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 1. Traffic is to be maintained at all times during the progress of this work and adequate signs, barricades end lights shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of Subchapter H of the N.Y.S. Department of Transportation's Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. A maintenance and protection of traffic plan may ha required. No lanes shall be closed without prior approval. 2. The applicant shall erect and maintain suitable barricades around all trenches while work is in progress for the protection pf the public, and they shall be suitably lighted by yellow lights at night. The work shall be carried on in such manner that not more than 100 feat of trench in earth remains open at end of day's work. 3. No pavement cuts are to be left unfilled over night, except in emergencies, end in such cases, adequate Drecautions must be exercised to protect traffic. Prior approval must he obtained to use steel plating. 4. Na construction materials or equipment shall be left an the shoulders ar pavement after working hours, nor shall any construction equipment or material he placed in any manner or location that will ohatruct highway ar railroad warning signs. 5. All open trench in the highway right~of~way shell he barricaded. There shall he conspicuously displayed bright red (lags no less Than 24" x 24" attached to such barricades and illuminated at night with flashing yellow lights. II in the judgment of the representative of the Commissioner of Transportation, flagmen era necessary, they shall ha employed by the permittee end on duty at all times during the progress of the work so es to direct traffic end maintain yellow flashing lights, etc. 6. Soft shoulder signs of adequate size, not less than 24" square, shall be erected and maintained an ell backfill trenches within the shoulder area until the backfill is thoroughly settled. These signs shall be located at the beginning of each section of work at intersections and et a distance not greater than 1000 feet apart. 7, During winter conditions highway shoulders shell be maintained free of ahstructions which would interfere with snow removal end ice control. B. The permittee shell keep the traveled way free of foreign objects such as rocks, timber and other items that may fall from transporting vehicles. Spillage of materiel carried by or dropped from the undercarriage of any carrying vehicle resulting from the permittee's hauling operations along or across any public traveled way shall be removed immediate ly end such traveled way, both within and outside of the work limits, shall be kept free of such spillage by the permittee. E. COMPLETION OF WORK 1. All work is to he performed in a manner approved by the Resident Engineer of the State Department of Transportation. 2. All disturbed areas shall be returned to their original condition in a manner satislectory Io the Commissioner of Transportation or his representative 3. The permittee shall be required to restore shoulders and ditches and clean up the highway as his work progresses. All driveways shall he restored with material in kind and to their original conditions. 4. All surplus earth and rubbish shall be cleaned up and removed from the highway righraf~way upon completion of the work, and the highway left in a neat and orderly condition. 5. As built plans showing final grade of new installation and existing underground facilities encountered shall be Drovided to N.Y.S.D.O.T. if variation from approved design plans occurred during construction. F. NECESSITATED FUTURE WORK 1. The applicant agrees, that any present or future injury to ar disturbance of the highway, its slopes ar gutters, caused by placing mains and service pipe shell he repaired by the applicant at his own expense and in accordance with the requirements of the State Department of Transportation. 2. If necessity arises in the future because of the work on the State Highway system andlor its structures, requiring the removal, relocation or replacement of the installation authorized by the permit, said work shell be done as directed by the Commissioner or his representatve, end all cost and expense so incurred shall be the obligation of the said permittee or his successor in interest. II. TELEPHONE ~ TELEGRAPH INSTALLATIONS A. SETTING OF POLES 1. All poles shall be set outside the ditch lines so that the proper drainage of the highway will not he interfered with. In case it is imprecticahle to set poles so es not to interfere with the flow of water in the ditches, iha shoulder, ditch and space around the poles shall be paved by the applicant to protect against wash. 2. There shall he no obstruction to private driveways, connecting highways or roads, paths or sidewalks. 3. In case it is found necessary to trim trees within the boundaries al the highway, the least Dossihle amount shell be done, and in all cases the consent of the abutting property owner must be secured before the poles are set and trees trimmed. 4. Poles shall be of sufficient length to provide a clearance of not less than eighteen feat between the wire end the crown of the highway, under the worst condtitions of temperature end loading. They shell he set in line and properly plumbed. They shall be well payed. No Buying to trees, unless by special permission of owner. Special precautions shall he taken on curves and where lines cross from one side of highway to the other. Poles shall he straight, sound, and the fittings shall be of sufficient strength to carry wires under the worst condition of loading lice, wind, etc). 5. Where telegraph and telephone wires cross high tension power lines, electric light or trolley wires, special precaution shall he taken to maintain proper clearance under the worst condition of temperature and loading. B. flESETTING POLES 1. If necessity arises in future, because of work on the highway, to relocate, replace or reset Doles, cables or conduits, said work shall be done at the expense of the applicant. III. SPECIAL CONDITIONS A. In addition to the aforementioned conditions, it it is found necessary by this Department to add to or otherwise modify the same, it is to he understood such changes shall form a part of the permit end he complied with immediately upon notice. IV. ADDITIONAL SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND SKETCHES ~ See Attached Sheet. Harold E. Gebhard ~itect 363 North Wellwood Avenue Lindenhurst, N.Y. 11757 _ ' 631 226 3708 fax 226-3088 New York State Dept. of Transportation Design Review / Permits Unit date 1/17/05 Region 10 - NYS Office Building Hauooauge, NY 11788 job no. attention: Mr. Mark Wolfgang re: Stanley Malon Civi Engineer ou e ~ ~c ogue SCTM# 0100-97-5-4.5 Please accept this: Case No. 03-336P 0 transmittal 0 fax cover correspondence Q invoice unnecessary paperwork Q other copies date description Dear Mr. Wolfgang: Pursuant to our recent discussion, I am enclosing hdrewith 4 copies of the revised DOT plan. _ ~ Please process toward approval. - ~j ****Thank-You**** __j_... i For: _ 3 c ' Q your approval 0 your records Q as per your request 0 other ~ .making paper- airplanes ~ Stanley Malon, Patricia Moore, Copy to: Bruno I Signed • ~~gUFFO(,~co • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS h~~ Gy P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE G ~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair y T OFFICE LOCATION: • ~ Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS y~~.( 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY GEORGE D. SOLOMON Telephone: 631 785-1838 Fax: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: James Richter, Town Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewe~ Date: January 19, 2005 Re: Stanley Malon SC Tax Map # 1000-97-5-4.5 The enclosed site plan received by tt~e Planning Board on December 27, 2004 reflects the current proposed build-out of this site. This site plan is for a new 18,112 sq. ft. commercial center on a 1.2356-acre parcel in the B Zone located approximately 83.35' west of Cox's Lane, on the n/s/o NYS Route 25 (Main Road), also known as 32845 NYS Route 25, in Cutchogue. Please review the plan and let us know your comments or concerns. The plan is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. rs .rtul 3G/r~~~^' ~~ro?r.0 /Jy '~`4 !'JYSQ~~. Enc. WILLIAM D. MOORS r-y ~ ~~_.a_ ~ - Attorney at Law ~ y ~ j 51020 Main Road ~ 1 20D5 r~1 Southold, New York 11971 ~ , SAN ~ 4 ~ " ~ Tel: (631) 765-4663 I~A.__~-,--°-~--" Fax: (631)765-4643 r, ~n FACSIMILE COVER SHEET The pages comprising this facsimile transmission contain confidential information from William D. Moore. This information is intended solely for use by the individual entity named as the recipient hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange to retrieve thi ~ ransmission at no cost to you. ~r i DATE : ~ J ~ 3 ' ~ TOTP'L NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET IF TRANSMISSION IS FAULTY OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON ~ / AS POSSIBLE. CLIENT NAME : ~/i~', %~fi~~~~!'-~s'~ /~-~lr~J c~,>/ ~G~ - ~s~ - OPERATOR: ,j 7 d~ k ~ ~s ~F ~ J ~ ~,n~~a- - ~ c+~- .ate - g~~ `f• ~ ~ T ~ /JZ.Bk,~ G~ a l~7~ /L14.~ - h1u,n .2C79yJ Gi,~ ~-t.-f'~../~G'2°-Gl~,~-P ...e~ho~vj ~i .le~'~ - - ~i~le~~~~~~' ~ ~ ~ T t~~rrr- SOUTHOLD TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Town Hall P. 0. Box 1179 53095 Ma(n Road Southold, NY 11971.0959 Phone (631)765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board FROM: Neboysha R. Brashich, Chairman vvv??? DATE: January 5, 2005 RE: Stanley Malon Commercial Center Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Stanley Malon Commercial Center plan on NYS Route 25 in Cutchogue. The Commission reviewed the proposed plan during its November 29, 2004 monthly meeting and concurs in the decision to have two separate entrances (enter and exit) at this location. l' ii~' JAN 101005 N M , HAROLD E. GEBHARD ~5 363 NORTH WELLWOOD AUE. LINDENHUR3f, NY 17757 ' (631)2263708 FAX (631) 226-3088 ARCHITECT December 24, 2004 Mr. Mark Wolfgang -Civil Engineer Design Review /Permits Unit ,a New York State Dept. of TransportationI ~l ~ ~ v Region 10 - NYS Office Building I _~?i ` 250 Veterans Highway ~ ~ ~ ~ DEC 2 7 Hauppauge, NY 11788 RE: Commercial Project for Stanley Malon i Route 25, Cutchogue ~ - SCTM # 0100-97-5-4.5 Case No. 03-336P Dear Mr. Wolfgang: Pursuant to our conversation of last ek and your letter of December 15t", 2004, enclosed please fin les of the New York State DOT site plan With revisigns as per the above. ~ _ Please process ward approval. ~ ~ ic~s - ~ o rs tr ~.t rold E. Gebhard Architect I! CC: Bruno -Town of Southold Patricia Moore -Attorney Stanley Malon - • • • • P~ I n - f, I U ~ V Zi STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I - 1 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAU PPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 SU BIMAL CN AKRA BORTI, P.E. JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER December 16, 2004 Mr. Hazold E. Gebhard, Architect 363 North Wellwood Ave. Lindenhurst, Ny 11757 Your November 8 2004 Submission Commercial Proiect for Stanley Malon Site Plans Dated 12/22/03, Last Revision 11/8/04 Route 25, Cutchoeue SCTM 100-97-5-4.5 Our Case No. 03-336P Deaz Mr. Gebhazd: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Discussions with Town of Southold personnel indicate it may be beneficial to note future cross access to the adjacent parcel to the east as well. In addition, discussions my staff has had with the Town personnel indicate that two (2) one way access points may provide better site access than a single two-way access point. Based on the site design and internal traffic circulation, we recommend that you consider an access design in accordance with the standards shown on the attached diagram. Prior to an approval of the site's access and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must he addressed: 1. The NYS Driveway Section detail shall be revised to show asphalt instead of concrete. Please use the same pavement specifications as you have indicated in the NYS Paving Detail 2. The NYS Conc. Curb Detail Type A shall also show the same pavement specifications as indicated in the NYS Paving Detail. Site plan approval for highway work permit issuance is contingent upon our receipt of all of the following items within six (6) months of the date of this letter and no further revisions aze made to the plans once we approve them. If the Highway Work Permit will be secured by anyone other than the property owner, i.e. contractor, the applicant must provide a signed letter from the property owner stating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the property owner in this matter. The letter must also include the property owner's mailing address and telephone number. M M Mr. Harold E. Gebhard December 16, 2004 Page 2 Kindly submit four sets of the revised plans, permit fee and surety bond (sample enclosed). It is also mandatory that protective liability insurance be provided by the permittee. This must be accomplished by submitting a completed Perm 17, Certificate of Insurance, in accordance with Option A (form enclosed), or by submitting the fee specified below to be covered under the NYSDOT Blanket Policy. Also enclosed is a Highway Work Permit Application to be completed and returned to us. The application, completed Perm 17 and the Surety Bond must be secured by the same party. All checks issued to the State of New York must show a Federal Identification Number. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): $550.00 Bond Amount:$20,000.00 Insurance Fee: $175.00 or Perm 17 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all con•espondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, +~i . SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachments cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold yMr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 Margazet Rutkowski Me]is~McGowan Secretaries November 9, 2004 Ms. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ~ ; (BY HAND) t Re: Stanley Malon f 1000-97-5-4.5 - Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Enclosed please find revised site plans with the "swale" in the rear of the property. The Health Department was awaiting the SEQRA determination in order to approve the sanitary. The Architect has completed the DOT final submission and we are awaiting final approval. I would ask that this plan be placed on the hearing calender for final site plan approval. This will enable the owner to seek appropriate tenants for the property. Thank you. Ve 'cia C. Moore cc: Mrs. Malon PCM/mm HAROLD E. GEBHARD 363 NORfH WELLWOOD AUE. LINDENHURST, NY 11757 (631) 226 3708 FAX (631)226.3088 November 8, 2004. ARCHITECT Mr. Mark Wolfgang State of New York Department of Transportation State Office Building 250 Veterans Memorial Highway _ Hauppauge, NY 11788-5518 Traffic Engineering and Safety RE: Commercial project for Stanley Malon Route 25, Cutchogue SCTM # 100-97-5-4.5 Case No. - 03-336P Dear Mr. Wolfgang: Pursuant to the above mentioned project, attached herewith are 4 copies of the New York State Department of Transportation site plan revised as per your letter of September 30~h, 2004 and our conversation. • Driveway design has been revised both in detail and location • Note added RE: Drywell • Shoulder asphalt detail revised • Curb inlet structure changed • Sidewalk along site frontage note added • Maintenance and protection details revised Ple a process w approval. Y rs truly, rold E. G hard hitect CC: S. Malon ~~~~1 P. Moore J a HAROLD E. GEBHARD 363 NORTH WELLWOOD AVE. LINDENHURST. NY 11757 0631) 22b-3708 FAX C637) 226-3088 ARCHITECT November 8, 2004 Mr. John Fitzgerald Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services c!~ ~ Office of Wastewater Management ~ , Suffolk County Center Riverhead, NY 11901 ~ J f~ RE: Mr. Stanley Malon - C10-01-0011 SCTM # 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Mr. Fitzgerald: Enclosed please find 5 site plans with sanitary details, revised as follows: • The SEQRA Determination is enclosed • Sewage disposal design calculations revised • Profile, details of sewage system revised • Sewage system invert elevations revised Ple se proce toward pproval. rs truly, rold E. Ge har rchitect CC: ' Patricia Moore Mr. & Mrs. Malon ~~g~FFOI~-~o • lyIAII,ING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS h~0 (j~ P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair y y. M OFFICE LOCATION: RICHARD CAGGIANO ~ • 'F Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J. CREMERS y~ol ~aO~ 54375 State Route 25 KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY Telephone: 631 786-1938 Fax: 831 76b-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD November 9, 2004 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site P{an for Stanley Malon Commercial Project Located 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane, on the n/s/o NYS Route 25, known as 32845 NYS Route 25, in Cutchogue SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5 Zone: B, General Business District Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, November 8, 2004: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves a new 18,112 sq. ft. commercial center on a 1.2356 acre parcel in the B Zone located 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane on the n/s/o NYS Route 25, knc~vn as 32845 NYS Route 25, in Cutchogue, SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 2004, the Planning Board has not received any comments or objections to the proposed action; therefore, be it RESOLVED that, on November 8, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Encl. f • gUFFO(,~c • MAII-ING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS .ZOO ~ P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair y ' ~ OFFICE LOCATION: RICHARD CAGGIANO ~ • Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J. CREMERS y~Q ~0~ 54375 State Route 25 KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY Telephone: 631 786-1938 Faz: 831 786-3138 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant November 8, 2004 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, h:~s determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepare:i. Name of Action: Proposed Site Plan for Stanley Malon SCTM#: 1000-97-5-4.5 Location: 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane on the n/s/o NYS Route 25, known as 32845 NYS Route 25, in Cutchogue SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: The proposed action involves a new 18,112 sq. ft. commercial center on a 1.2356 acre parcel in the B Zone. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. There has not been any correspondence received from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, Southold Town Building Department, Southold Town Board, Southold Town Board of Trustees, NYSDEC -Stony Brook, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, New York State Department of Transportation, or the Suffolk County SEOR Negative Declar~n -Page Two Department of Public Works in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from these agencies. There has not been any correspondence received from the Suffolk County Department of Planning in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the Department of Health Services Office in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the Suffolk County Water Authority Office in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Mark Terry, Environmental Planner Address: Southold Town Planning Board Telephone Number: (h31)765-1938 (x 229) cc: Southold To~~~n Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Planning Department • ' Su,+~ CUTCNOGUI CUTCH(~GUE FIRE DISTRICT ~ [ ~ f ~ T i 260 New Suffolk Roads Cutchogue, NY 11935 r. o. Telephone (631) 734-6907 Fax (631) 734-7079 75 Yeazs E-mail: cutfd@optonline.net of Service October 25, 2004 Planning Board Office • Bruno Semon, Planner PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Ref: SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Stanley Malon Dear Mr. Semon, With reference to the above property, the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Cutchogue Fire District does not feel that a fire well is needed due to the properties location in a near proximity to an existing fire well. Thank you for your request and please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Board of Fire Commissioners • Matthew J. Martin , District Secretary _ , 2 I.1 Lj r~T 2 F j~ ~gUFFO~,~~, MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~G, f, P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~ ~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair y OFFICE LOCATION: W Al RICHARD CAGGIANO • Town Hall Annex WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~fQ ~0 54375 State Route 25 KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H. SIDOR Southold, NY Telephone: B31 766.1838 Fas: 631 766-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 18, 2004 Matthew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Mr. Martin: RE: SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Enclosed please find one (1) site plan/survey, last revised September 10, 2004, for the Commercial Site Plan for Stanley Malon, Main. State Road, Cutchogue, New York. The enclosed site plan is being referred to;iou for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Very tr y yours, runo a on Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. Semon, Bruno Subject: Malon Stanley SEQRA Neg DEC Hi Mark, As we discussed both the neg dec resolution and neg dec are prepared for this project. The project is scheduled for the 11/8/04 public hearing. Please review and indicate if something else needs to be reviewed for this project. Please prepare the EAF part 2 and top sign page for JW based on your review. 11-9-04 Malon 11.9.04Malon :omm neg dec.doc..:ommercial Neg De.. The office file is in the meeting box by Carols desk under the SCTM97.-5-4.5. Thanks Bruno 1 Oct- 15-04 01 :21P H~LD E GEBHARD AIA 5126 3088 P.O1 ~2 A 8 I '9`0 41 o I ~ ~Iv I ~ $ o Y Angle unit tls th 11 unit tl h 1 STALL 81 AISLE DIAGRAM STALL H AISLE DIMENSIONS ANGLE A 9 C D E F 30° 1)3 12 2fit Ifi0 ]O.0 16S R6 3Eo 4S° 198 12 333 127 IS) 345 3lfi 4S2 60° 21.0 14S 37.6 10~ R-I 9A 61.9 S70 O sa• go x4 3L0 so oA oA szo szo „-,~,........d~..~.~..,.. -t rg- 31310 ~'i,i`- +i~l _ 11,.E s t_..• NOTE MINIMUM TWO WAY 4131.E WIOTN TO BE 24.0 'i i i ,e. _ `dlcwn l i F__-_ ._o,.,.. PARKING STALL 81 AISLI ~ SPECIFICATIOf _ a. i- - ~ n~1n ~~~r VS !(~LC~i~O~~ ~'6 D OCT - g 2CO4 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SOOth01d TOWII 5O VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY Planning Board HAU PPAUGE, N.Y. 1 1 788-55 1 8 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI~ P.E. .105 EPM H. BOAROMAN REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER September 30, 2004 Mr. Harold E. Gebhard, Architect 363 North Wellwood Ave. Lindenhurst, Ny 11757 Your September 17, 2004 Submission Commercial Project for Stanlev Malon Site Plans Dated 12/22/03, Last Revision 9/10/04 Route 25, Cutchoeue SCTM 100-97-5-4.5 Our Case No. 03-336P Dear Mr. Gebhard: This is in regazd to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Thank you for addressing the issue of cross access and we are in agreement with the new proposed location, which removes conflicts from the proposed Route 25 entrance. Prior to an approval of the site's access and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. The design of the proposed driveway entrance has been changed from a drop curb type entrance to an intersection type entrance; however, the specifications provided aze applicable to a drop curb type entrance. Additionally, the driveway radius, where it meets the Route 25 travel lane, extends beyond the property line. Please refer to the copy of the attached diagram, taken from our Policy & Standazds Manual, regazding minimum driveway offsets from adjacent property lines. We recommend the driveway be designed for a drop curb type as originally shown and that minimum offsets from the adjacent property line are provided. Please revise the plans accordingly. 2. The note you have added regarding cleaning drainage structures shall require the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the Route 25 site frontage at the completion of construction. Please revise the plans accordingly. 3. The shoulder re-construction asphalt item numbers and depths shall conform to current superpave specification item numbers as follows: Top Course - 1-1/2", Item 402.098301M & Item 402.098311M Binder Course - 2-1/2", Item 402.198901M & Item 402.198911M Base Course - 6", Item 402.378901M & Item 402.378911M 4. The curb inlet structure shall be designed in accordance with bicycle safety. Please show a reticuline grate for this structure. Mr. Hazold E. Gebhard September 30, 2004 Page 2 5. The sidewalk along the site frontage shall note the finish as slip resistant, broom finish. 6. The Maintenance and Protection of Traffic (MPT) plan shall be shown correctly for this site. The plan shown is not applicable for the proposed work at this site since it shows a right lane closure, which is only applicable on a one-way highway. A lane shift scheme or lane closure scheme would be more appropriate. Please review the attached examples, which we previously provided, and apply the correct MPT plan for this site. Please retain the note "All lanes must be open to traffic before 9 AM and after 3 PM. No lane closings aze permitted on weekends or holidays. Nighttime lane closings will not be permitted without prior approval from the State Permit Inspector." Please submit four sets of revised plans. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mazk Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regazding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. nVrerpy~trauly yonur~s, Rv `S1~IIK IAS ~A11~,Y.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachments cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold ,/Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW PLANNING BOARD MEMBER o~Og~FfO(,~coG JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE y~ P.O. Box 1179 Chair y Z Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO O ~ ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 KENNE H L EDWARDS y~01 ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE October 5, 2004 TQWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of 'ead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should bps evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Proposed Site Plan for Stanley Malon Commercial Project Located at 32845 NYS Route 25 in Cutchogue SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5 Zone: B, General Business District Requested Action: The proposed action involves a new 18,112 sq. ft. commercial center on a 1.2356 acre parcel in the B Zone. The property is located approximately 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane, on the n/s of NYS Route 25 (Main Road), in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5 SEQRA Classification: ()Type I (x) Unlisted Contact Person: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner (631) 765-1938 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( )This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free t contact this office for further information. i Very truly yours, l/Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department PLANNING BOARD MEMBE• o~pSpFFO(,~~oG JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE y~ P.O. Box 1179 Chair o Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 w x Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO Oy ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 5, 2004 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Stanley Malon Commercial Project Located approximately 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane, on the n/s/o NYS Route 25, known as 32845 NYS Route 25, in Cutchogue SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5 Zone: B, General Business District Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 4, 2004: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves a new 18,112 sq. ft. commercial center on a 1.2356 acre parcel in the B Zone located approximately 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane on the n/s/o NYS Route 25 (Main Road), known as 32845 NYS Route 25, in Cutchogue, SCTM#1000-97-5-4.5; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEAR lead agency coordination process for this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Jenlyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson "cr ~ c. _ ~ /.J,IG ~ ~ _ jy- ~ . _ ; fir. =,.a , "t - ° J r~ c - r~;..~_~' ~-a _ ~ „t, 1. a, ; . ~yd ~ s8, ti x t W,~i.a*~ x r: a „t ~ . A~`ti.~'n~~:' - - . ` ""~,~~~r ~ ~ ~ ~~q, i` r"'~ A, k a T a 'vM a~ ~~F~ Sp/ ~ c fix''.' ~y ~ ^ '`w~*-*Nt ~~"I~m7t~ s ~3$n`~"„«£~p' ~ n; ~ ~ rs?~` ~3 k ~ 3~ - - . ,h. t, o- ' T~ :5 } t.Y'..1 't~ 9r i~~l ~'i~ t o ~'r ~ a,~~` ~ 3 y t ~ ~~~va+lrw+r~.s ,.~y~` '°~q'a -...e ~r -.'t - _ -i.' - _ . ~W F° : ( '..s¢W 6} ~~'l7':f' 3 ^ ~ G ~ k^ I ~ ,~'Ft~ Y T e5 i r~~~ ~ ~ 3; R - _ 4 - ~ _ - Z r ~ _ _ ~R'71j"~Y /"5 iY~ ~m4( a~. a. °~c'~~ i y~5~, `y.,~ j £ ~ 4't< ~ _ J,V,~~- _.-^i.-. r - ~.Y'~.~-h "~`t, .~"'.-"`f_,,,~,.._ - _ - ~ie i~'`~ t t. um~:~ r 5 x~ ~ a ~'`'y~ rt r i~ - - _ r,v . _ - - " _ h p L 4 i. . » u 1 `~r" ~ yy~~,,~~"~~~ f .k i ~ ~ ~fi j~9r ~ Y ~ ~"Ya. ~ ~ - r. = h, ~•v: r'~^ ~ yv~~t~x ` a7 vr"" pR. v; a ~ s s~.,,• .G 'r~~_,~a _ ~ ~ _ 3 ! t>ro ~ F.... _ n, tyy § ,yk ~ ~ {.7i rt, { x _"'T Imo'-' ~ ~ ° ~ .s N,,,t . .l,{ 14.[1..,,2 hit 4.i' ~ i4:"V~ I' } ti ~ ~ i~ n , E ~ _ - Iyfv'~ t NA11NI" Ar x:~vf= '-a ' ~ ~ ~ h ; f ~ ~ ~ ~ t ' - -3 ~ ~ - i~' ~ ~ a~ F r~,4.42~ i1~ls} j:. ?~yli4 ~ ~ t' , i ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ . i 9 r s r ~ ~ PROPERTY II~ORMAT) ~ ~ r v,s H T ~-M+r.~I~ h i ' Styr ~ ~ - _ _ 1 , 1 ~t r I. ~ - -4 - - _ _ _ - _ i ~ r a~~ ~ x _ J 4 j F °4 C J ~c ~ ~ ~JY{ ~ ~ . '1. r r . ~ y ~ v }~f' c x _ - ~ ~ I, f ' ~~~~j~ ~°k'O1t'~~. ` ~ ~~~4 ~111111~~,,11``~~/r~ ~ E~ .~7~,~'i~i~E.,' ~ f ~t/~ t ~ 1 ~ [f 5¢ ~ ~ y ' _ t 'x ~,1~ .~y:;.,~r~Vk'rti'm'f~ ~ ¢ - t"~{~ pt ~yP"r ~q a t r I ~~illl i ' _.,t ~ f ~"""1 ~ ~N~:kd e' Hof-rN ~ ~~n ~ ~ ~ .i ~ i ri.,, 41 'k-~ c , ~ i _ , ti 1 - - x TJI, iA. n '.7 F"t tc~ _ t-'~_f~T~~~'~'~'~ F ~ ~ lip ~ - K - ~ ~ K~-K-- h---~f--- ~ a, - - --x Y':\ ~il r'iN~ - +i;. ' ~ NC- -'':AIN '~r ~ E"Jt. ~ a" _ i TEST HOLE DAT DONE BY MCDONALD GEOSCIENCE DONE 10/24/01 N/F GLOVER j1D - DARK BROWN 7' SANDY LOAM OL 51'p '4 CONC. 154.16 BROWN LOAMY MON. 3' SAND SM PALE BROWN i0 A ~ COARSE SAND SW `~~ja 12.0 i 8.5' N WATER IN PALE ~ p x W BROWN FINE TO (II COARSE SAND Iv ~ !AO .N m 15' SW W Iv ox CHAIN LINK p 15.0 FENCE ~ x w 'o N ~ _ ~ ~ 'o Cn rn o LOT 3 0 ° ~ o ° N/F KAELIN ~ N ~ to ° p 'O _~tT p GUARANTEES INDICATED HERE ON SHALL RUN ONLY l0 7Nf PERSQV FOR NHOM THE SURVEY lS PREPARED, AND ON NIS BEHALF TO 7NE CHAIN LINK RILE COMPANY, GOV£RNMENTAL AGENCY, Fr LEND/NC INSRTURON, lF LISTED NEREQN, ANO TO THE ASSIGNEES L1~ IHf LfNO/NC TNSANPON. CUARAN/EE5 ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL INSRTUBONS OR SUBSEOUENi OWNERS. UNAUTHORIZED AL7ERA7ION OR AODIRQV 10 iN/5 CON . SURVEY /S A NOLA7ION OF SECTION 7208 Of M ~ 1.3' 7HE NEW YgPX STATE EDUCADON UW. (..1 ~ COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING N ` 1 7HE UND SURVEYORS EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL (O ~P O NOT BE CQNSlOfREO TO BE A VALID TRUE Iv F20 ENT. R L': CDPr. 1~ ~ ~^1 18.6 m ~ CONC. ~ Ui m t8.1 O N/F KAELIN 2-STORY ~ ~ TEST HOLE RESIDENCE 49.1' WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE COVERED STEPS _ 12.5' ~ ~ VD F•~.1 CONC. w-~~y ~ ~ °A ~ p CONC. ~ J MON. V~,4' SIGN ~ O MON. S 46' 10 10 W 150.00 TIE = 83.35' MAIN STATE ROAD (NYS 25) ELEVATION SOURCE: H-326 RESET 1968 FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION OF BUILDING IS 13.51 FEET 1929 NGVD. TM// 1000-097-OS-04.5 SURVEY OF SURVEYED: 7 NOVEMBER 2001 10T 4 MINOR SUBDIVISION MADE FOR JOHN J. MIESNER, JR. SCALE 1'= 4D' • SITUATE AREA = 53,821.43 S. F. CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OR SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 1.236 ACRES SURVEYED FOR: STANLEY MALON SURVEYED BY STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR. P.O. BOX 294 NEW SUFFOLK. N.Y. 11956 631-7 4-5835 GUARANTEED 70: STANLEY MALON LENS LAN SU OR NYS Lic No. 492 01C1084 ~ r Semon, Bruno To: Planning Board & Val; Harris, Peter; Richter, Jamie Subject: FW: Malon Site Visit at 1 PM on 9/23/04 Hi This is for your information. We had a site visit on 9123104 at f pm Attendance: Bruno Semon Marty Sidor Peter Harris Chuck King The following was discussed: It appears that the north side of the Malon property is absorbing water from the property and properties around it. This is occurring by natural grade and a low elevation. It was not clear on where the actual north property line is. It could be that the low elevation absorbing water is partially on the Glover property. The properties on both east and west of the Malon are built out and elevated. When the Malon site is built it will contain the storm water runoff from it's property, however not except any other runoff. It was agreed that a problem exists with the storm water runoff from the properties adjoining the Malon property. It would be best to look for a solution to the problem. It was discussed that possibly a swale be installed on the property line to pickup runoff. This would require that the Planning Board rearrange the parking in the rear and possibly waive some parking requirements. BS agreed to contact the applicant and bring this to the Planning Board for review. -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 1:12 PM To: Terty, Mark; Richter, Jamie; Harris, Peter; Scopaz, Valerie Cc: Jeri Woodhouse (E-mail); Kalin, Carol; L'Eplattenier, Victor; Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail); Randolph, Linda; Richard Caggiano; William Cremers Subject: Malon Site Visit at SPM on 9/23/04 To avoid delays in processing this site plan Pete Harris and I will meet at the Maoln site by Glovers Barn on 9/23104 at 1 PM. Does anybody else want to meet? Thanks Bruno 1 Semtln, Bruno From: Scopaz, Valerie Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 12:50 PM To: Semon, Bruno Cc: Terry, Mark; Richter, Jamie Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan Bruno, I would like you to coordinate the meeting between Mark and Jamie. Whatever works for the three of you is fine with me. I only want to hear the consensus position, if you can arrive at such a thing, so that the PB has the benefit of that discussion and information. Valerie -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:03 AM To: Scopaz, Valerie Cu Terry, Mark Subject: FW: Malon Site Plan This is good for him. When do you want to have the meeting? -----Original Message----- From: Terry, Mark Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:50 AM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan Wed or Thurs -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 8:33 AM To: Terry, Mark Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan When is good? -----Original Message----- From: Terry, Mark Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 8:27 AM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan Tues is no good for me -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 8:25 AM To: Terry, Mark; Trezza, Anthony; Verity, Mike; Richter, Jamie; Harris, Peter Cc: Scopaz, Valerie Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan Hi Everyone, As per the attached email from Valerie Scopaz. Can we please set a meeting to discuss the Malon Commercial SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5. How is Tuesday 9121/04 at 10:00 am in the Planning Boards Office ? Thanks 1 Bruno • -----Original Message----- Prom: Scopaz, Valerie Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 3:40 PM To: Semon, Bruno Cc: Richter, Jamie; Terry, Mark Subject: Malon Site Plan Importance: High Everyone, The PB wants a close look at the proposed drainage for this site. After reading NP&V's review of the drainage situation for the ZBA, I think a joint meeting is in order. At issue is whether the site is being overbuilt at the expense of adequate on-site drainage. Please arrange a meeting. Valerie 2 Semon, Bruno To: Scopaz, Valerie Cc: Terry, Mark Subject: FW: Malon Site Plan This is good for him. When do you want to have the meeting? -----Original Message----- From: Terry, Mark Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:50 AM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan Wed or Thurs -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 8:33 AM 70: Terry, Mark Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan When is good? -----Original Message----- From: Terry, Mark Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 8:27 AM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan Tues is no good for me -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 8:25 AM To: Terry, Mark; Trezza, Anthony; Verity, Mike; Richter, Jamie; Harris, Peter Cc: Scopaz, Valerie Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan Hi Everyone, As per the attached email from Valerie Scopaz. Can we please set a meeting to discuss the Malon Commercial SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5. How is Tuesday 9/21/04 at 10:00 am in the Planning Boards Office ? Thanks Bruno -----Original Message----- From: Scopaz, Valerie Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 3:40 PM To: Semon, Bruno Cc: Richter, Jamie; Terry, Mark Subject: Malon Site Plan Importance: High Everyone, The PB wants a close look at the proposed drainage for this site. After reading NP&V's review of the drainage situation for the ZBA, I think a joint meeting is in order. At issue is whether the site is being overbuilt at the expense of adequate on-site drainage. Please arrange a meeting. Valerie 1 Semon, Bruno From: Scopaz, Valerie Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:43 AM To: Semon, Bruno Cc: Verity, Mike Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan Bruno, Mike does not need to attend this meeting as this is a drainage issue. Valerie -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 7:25 AM To: Terry, Mark; Trezza, Anthony; Verity, Mike; Richter, Jamie; Hams, Peter Cc: Scopaz, Valerie Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan Hi Everyone, As per the attached email from Valerie Scopaz. Can we please set a meeting to discuss the Malon Commercial SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5. How is Tuesday 9/21/04 at 10:00 am in the Planning Boards Office ? Thanks Bruno -----Original Message----- From: Swpaz, Valerie Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 3:40 PM To: Semon, Bruno Cc: Richter, Jamie; Terry, Mark Subject: Malon Site Plan Importance: High Everyone, The PB wants a close look at the proposed drainage for this site. After reading NP&V's review of the drainage situation for the ZBA, I think a joint meeting is in order. At issue is whether the site is being overbuilt at the expense of adequate on-site drainage. Please arrange a meeting. Valerie 1 • • i Semon, Bruno From: Terry, Mark Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 10:20 AM To: Spiro, Melissa; Scopaz, Valerie; Semon, Bruno; Trezza, Anthony; Kalin, Carol; Randolph, Linda Subject: Marty Sidor Marty called and informed me that his wife went into emergency surgery due to bleeding of the brain...she is on the road to recovery, but they have to wait it out a little longer. Understandingly, he may not make the meeting on Monday. I reccomend that we send them get well flowers TODAY? He did have the following concerns: Scott, Sandra...His postion is that Mr. Starkie and Mr. Jenkins opposition is a condition of the dev right sale and outside of the PB jurisdiction. . alo ~ned about the drainage and repuccusions of the site plan on properties in the watershed. He wants e PB to look at the impacts holistically. Summitt Estates Pond Violation...As he was chased by a swarm of mosquitos he determine that the drainage swale as proposed is acceptable to him. He does not want to create a environmental hazard for residents. He also spoke to AI Krupski. 1 ,Sep 16 04 02:43p Moore Law Office S31 'J65 4643 p.l ~ub~P' 85 r~~rRic~ c. nzootx~ At[omey at Law 6 t ~2~ h131f1 ROAd Southold, NewYo:k 17971 TeL(63;) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 FACSIM_LE CCVER S?=EEP The pdyes comprising _his facsimile transmission contain ccr.'idential i71*ormation frcm Patricia C. Moore. This information is intended solely fcr use by the individual entity na!ned as the recipient hereof. If you are not the int_nded recipien=, :te aware tha*_ any disclosure, copying, distri:.ution, or. use o_° the eonter.ts of this tra,.smissicn is prohibited. f you have received this transmissior. in errcr, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may ar,-arge tc retrieve this Uransmission at no cost to you. 3E:_jil2C6 it y :CTRL vUM.3nR OF PAGES INCLUDING CO'vER SHEET IF TF~\TSMISSIGtS IS FALTLT't OR INCO?~I?LETB, =LEASE CALL SACK AS SOON AS POS~ISLF. CL;EN'3 NAIAr C~[i!i OP~RA'TOR: %`l~Cd:;.'ci p ~~~o~~ SEP 1 ; 1~. Southold Town Planning Aoard 631 7E5 4643 P•2 •Sep 16 04 U2:43p Moose Law Office PAGE 01 _ 09/15/2d2~ 08: 3L 51 4253E SCHI RALDI AS o (5161 7~7- 6677 W.M.S. r+~alty ~~7 ,L, .zcr/ y Re: Crass Easement Cutchogue Medical Center and Malan Development ' Drar Mra. Poore: Wa are in receipt of year letter regarding the cross eaGammnt on our progeny. The relocation of the existing cross easement is feasible provided the parties jointly agree that 1t is mutually beneficial to provide for either oxle or two curb cuts. We wish Co reserve this decieior. until the tenants on the Melon property are determined through binding ices es. Oux facility is curzently, 100 occupied and we see no nerd to d a turb the site. However, certain teaarcieB at the N,alon property would be symbiotic for our tenant e, and we would provide a c~rh cut hetween tine properties, while Other tenar.ciee would not benefit the cvnnectinr.. ~+leaee advise us when the oocupancy far the Melon property is determined. For caw wA w3.1L leave it up to ` LhA plan_•sing 6oar'd to reserve the placement of the future cross easerneres. vary truly yours, 6 MAIN AVENUE • GAAOEN CI'Y. N.Y. l153Q Semon, Bruno To: Terry, Mark; Trezza, Anthony; Verity, Mike; Richter, Jamie; Harris, Peter Cc: Scopaz, Valerie Subject: RE: Malon Site Plan Hi Everyone, As per the attached email from Valerie Scopaz. Can we please set a meeting to discuss the Malon Commercial SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5. How is Tuesday 9/21104 at 10:00 am in the Planning Boards Office ? Thanks Bruno -----Original Message----- From: Scopaz, Valerie Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 3:40 PM 70: Semon, Bruno Cc: Richter, Jamie; Terry, Mark Subject: Malon Site Plan Importance: High Everyone, The PB wants a close look at the proposed drainage for this site. After reading NP&V's review of the drainage situation for the ZBA, I think a joint meeting is in order. At issue is whether the site is being overbuilt at the expense of adequate on-site drainage. Please arrange a meeting. Valerie 1 MAR-17-2004 1450 ~ Sl7N,Pl7PE,LLP 516 425 1257 P.02 j ~~ialon properq, Ltitchogue • ~ ' ~ ~,ratLnt and Drainap Review S/~F D ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ GRADIIVG AND DRAINAGE REVIEW ~ ~ S. MALON PROPER'T'Y @ Cv'rcxOGUE R~~~'1 iCD SEP 1 5 YC MAR 1 7 2004 Southold Town eyed for: 'Linda Kowalski Plannin BoarA ZONINp gpgRD Town of Southold OF gppEgLS Zoning Board of Appeals, Town Ball 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-0959 Prepared by: Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 Date: March 9, 2004 The Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals has retained Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, I.LC (NpBcV) for consulting services in review of the S. lvlalon site plan with respect to drainage (both on-site and off-site influence), grading and the potential impacts to adjacent properties for the above referenced application. The proposed action involves the demolition of the existing structures on a 1.24 acre parcel in Cutchogue to allow for the development of a two (2) commercial structures and associated site improvements. Five retail stores, three offices, and a delicatessen are the proposed uses within the commercial structures. The site currently contains a two story residence and shed neaz the road frontage, with the remainder of the site containing early successional vegetation and a wooded fringe along the perimeter. This document analyzes the proposed grading and drainage as a result of the development and its associated impact to and from adjacent properties. Location and Site Overview The overall project site is located on the north side of Main Road (NYS Route 25), 83.35 feet west of Cox's Lane in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The subject property can be more particularly described as SCTM number 1000-97-05-04.5. The 1.24 acre parcel contains a total of approximately 150 feet of frontage on Main State Road (NYS 25) and is partially developed with a 2 story residence, a wood shed and associated access drive. The Pace t MAR-17-2004 1450 NEL , POPE, LLP 516 425 1257 r. n3 ~ nProP~Y,~etwaue wding and Dratnalc iYeview ` i Np&V MQ4O63 remainder of the site consists of eazly successional vegetation and a wooded fringe exists along the northern, eastern and western site boundaries, The site is relatively flat along the southern developed perimeter, although contains an elevated mound in the central portion of the site as a result of prior fill activities. The center of the site maintains an elevation of 16 feet above mean soa level (ms]) and slopes downward towards the adjacent properties to the north, east and west creating low points with elevations ranging from 9 feet to 12 feet above msl. Although these areas of lower elevations did not contain wetland vegetation, it is anticipated that stormwater runoff periodically ponds in these locations. Based on test hole data depicted on the Site plan, the groundwater elevation is 3 feet above msl. Therefore, the depth to groundwater ranges from 13 feet below the ground surface in the central ~ portion of the site to a minimum of 6 feet below the ground surface near the central portion of-. the eastern property boundary. The site is zoned General Business `B', as are the properties to the east and west. The property to the north is zoned `I.B', north of which is `A-C' zoning. R-80 and RO zoning are located on the south side of Main Road The adjacent properties on the north side of Main Road are developed with a variety of commercial uses, ranging from a medical center and retail development to the west, commercial retail/service facility to the east, and a warehouse to the north. A cemetery is located south of the site on the south side of Main Road, east of which is a wetland depression/stream. This feature originates from a culvert located o» the south side of Main Road, which is presumably connected to catch basins o» Cox's lane a»d Main Road, and ultimately discharges to East Creek. The wetland is not mapped as a NYSAEC regulated freshwater wetland; however appears to be mapped on the Town of Southold Freshwater and Tidal GVetlands Map. It is noted that this map is for resource purposes only and does not assume any regulatory authority. The Town Trustees regulate activities within 100 feet of freeshwater wetlands and should determine whether a wetland permit will tie necessary for the proposed project. Pro ed oiect The proposed action involves the demolition of the existing structures on site to allow for the development of a two (2) commercial structures and associated site improvements. The western most structure will contain a 1,121 s.f. delicatessen, a 948 s.f. retail store, and two (2) offices totaling 448 s.f. and 1,121 s.f. The eastern most structure will consist of four (4) retail stores with two (2) totaling 1,121 s.f. in size and the remaining two (2} totaling 1,033 s.f. 13rick pavers will separate the structures, which will be connected in the center by a mezzanine that will house the owner's office (totaling 880 s.f). A total of 60 parking spaces {including 13 landbanked spaces) will be provided and are distributed to the north and south of the proposed structures. A total of 61.19 parking spaces are required as indicated on the Site plan. A single site access will be provided from Main Road, located approximately 10 feet from .the western property boundary. An additiona124 foot wide access isprovided along the western'pmpertyboundsry in the southern portion of the site, connecting the site to the commercial development to the west, The location of a futwe 24 foot wide cross-access to the adjacent site is also depicted near the eastern property boundary in the southern portion of the site, to allow traffic flow to and from the Pace 2 h1RR-1-2064 1451 LSON,POPE,LLP . 516 425 1257 P.174 . jMaton Propat~, Ctittehotae . Grading and Draineee Review DIP&'P M04063 adjacent property to the east. Ten (10) foot wide landscaped areas will be established along the length of the eastern and western property boundaries and the undeveloped portion of the site along the northern property boundary is proposed to remain undisturbed. 'n and Drain onsiderations The site plan has been roviewed with respect to grading and drainage and the potential impacts to adjacent properties. The proposed structures will have a finished floor elevation of 14.5 feet, with the parking area maintaining an elevation ranging from approximately 13 feet to 11.25 feet, gently sloping toward the east. Although earthwork calculations are not provided, it is anticipated that exportation of fill will be required as a result of building and drainage structure excavations and to reduce the existing mound located in the central portion of the property. A two-tiered retaining wall system is proposed along the eastern property boundary, with each wall maintaining a height of approximately two feet in order to provide a grade transition to the low point on the adjacent property. Comments and recommerutations on site grading are provided herein: 1. The existing elevations along the pastern property boundary in the center of the site appear inaccurate. a. An unlabeled existing conaour line is indicated between elevation ]0 (an-site) and elevation 9 (off-site). This contour should be labeled and the adjacent contours/existing spot elevations should be corrected as necessary. b. The existing 9 foot contour depicted ofj-site does not coincide wish the elevations provided on the Retaining Wall Detail (Landscape Pdan) and should be corrected accordingly. 2. The bottom elevation of the proposed retaining walls should be indicated an the Sire Plan. 3. It appears as if the retaining wall as depicted on the Reeaining Wall Detail (Landscape Plan) extends slightly eastward beyond the property line. ]t is recommended that alt siee construction and associated disturbance be confined within the site boundaries and that offsee front the property line be provided The Planning Board should determine if the construction of a retaining wall at the property boundary is acceptable. 4. The topographic contours and/or select spot elevations near the western property line should be provided to establish existing conditions and determine property grading and drainage design with respect to the site as well as the adjacent property. 5. Earthwork calculations should be provided to determine cut/fill quantities so that construction impacts can be addressed if necessary. Arainage calculations are provided, and indicate that eleven (11), 10 fooC diameter drywells (6' depth) will be required to accommodate stormwater runoff. These drywells are distributed throughout the paved areas on site and according to the typical drywell section, will maintain a two-foot separation distance to the underlying groundwater. Recommendations: 1. The applicam should provide documentation from the Town Engineering Department that design criteria based on a ] '/z" rain event is acceptable. According to Chapter A108-28, Highway SpeCiftCations of the Town of Southold Town Code, the design criteria should be based on a 2" rain event. However, if a 1 rain event is deemed acceptable, a multiplier 7age 3 Mt~-17-2004 14:51 ~,POPE,LLP 516 425 1257 P.05 aton property, Ltitcho4ue ` adinj and Drfdnage Revltw - ~ • . WPdcV p04063 of O.I25 should be utiiixed 2. The drairutge calculations do not account for 2,328 sf. of brick pavers and should be revised accordingly, and additional drainage structures provided as necessary. 3. Akhough the drainage calculations t»dicate that stormwater from "undeveloped areas" and "landscaped arras" will be diverted w paving, it appears as though stormwattr from these locations will be divtreed off`--site to adjacent propertiss. All site-generated stosmwarer runoff' should be Contained on stet. 4. The 70 foot wide landscaped arras proposed along the eastern and wtstern property boundartes (including tiered retaining wall system) should be graded such that overland flow will not be directed toward adjacent properties. S. It is noted that the proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities at the site is anticipated to be greater than one (1) acre. New York State now requires construction projects involving disturbances of I acre and greater to obtain coverage from NYS Department of Environmental Protection (DEC) under the Phase TI State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Program. Specifically, the site owner must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Srormwater Runoff from Construction Activity (GP-02-OT) prior to the initiation of construction activities. To obtain coverage under the General Permit, the site owner is required to prepare an erosion control plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Permit information is available from the DEC Region T ojj4ce or the DEC website (http://www.dec.state.ny. us/website/daw/Phasell.html). STIMMARY )n conclusion, the proposed action involves the redevelopment of property to a commercial retail use. The site does not appear to contain significant environmental features that would limit future development, provided adequate drainage and containment of on-site runoff are achieved and sanitary systems are properly designed and constructed. The site grading and drainage as currently proposed may result in the diversion of storrnwater runoff to adjacent properties. It is recommended that the applicant address the issues stated herein and revise the Site Plan accordingly. Page 4 TOTAL P.05 PATRI~ C. MOORE, ATTORNEY ~ LAW svcl3F~ 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (631} 765-4330 DATE piny/~ y ~ ~ n , ' ~ TC ~,(//fD~~n Q SUBJECT ~J ~ J L J J c~~z~'~-ems' ~~-u-~L~ ~ ~t-C~ ,,~~~.~n. SIGNED ' PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 Mazgaret Rutkowski Me]issaMot'iow~m Secretazies September 14, 2004 WMS Realty Inc. 6 Main Avenue Garden City, NY 11530 Re: Main Road, Cutchogue Your property: 1000-97-5-4.7 Client: Stanley Malon Client's property: 1000-97-5-4.5 Deaz Sir or Madam: My client's property is obtaining site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Boazd to construct a commercial center on their property. Your property contains a recorded cross easement located 10' from the front property line. The location of the existing easement does not benefit either property and has not been opened. The Planning Boazd has asked us to contact you to offer to relocate the existing cross easements to the reaz ofboth properties. I have provided a copy of the subject area to illustrate the relocation of the easement. My client has offered to improve this easement to facilitate access between the properties. It is our opinion that the cross easement is mutually beneficial to the tenants and represents good planning. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore cc: Mr. & Mrs. Malon / Southold Town Planning Board ? Rug 23 04 03:06p Moore t_aw OfFice 631 765 4643 p.2 • ~ <ii~ i°a PATRICTA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Melis=aMd3aiwai Secretaries August 23, 2004 Ms. Jerri 1Noodiouse, Chairwoman and Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 (BY FAX) Re: Stanley Malon 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Ms. 1~'oodhouse~ In response to your question regarding the improvements proposed to the reaz ofthe property adjacent to Mr, Glover, I have consuhed with the architect and he advised me that the rear of the property was proposed to remain in a "Natural State". The Plamting Board had accepted our request to "land bark" 13 parking spaces along the rear of thz property. The three drainage structures are not needed if the asphalt and parking are not constructed, consequently, the land and natural vegetation wiil be left in a natural state. If the land is left in a natural state a swale would not be requirzd and would not be recommended by thz azchi[ect. The tinal engineerng is being prepared and I would ask that the Board clarify that the reaz of the property may remain in its "Natural State". I would ask to meet with the Board at today's scheduled work session. Thank you. V ery truip furs, C ~ ~ PatriciaC.Moore \,1 ~ PCVL`mm ~ Q ~1 ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ U ~o go,,u~o, ~ ?~z,a Q~z;,~, , Rus 23 04 03:06p Moore Law Office 631 765 4643 p.l • i PATRICIA C. MOORS Aaorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 7 1971 Tei: (631 j 765-433D :ax:(631)765-a 543 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET The pages come=icing this facsimile transmission contain ccnfidertial :nforrnaLion from Patricia C. Moore. This in'orm.ation is intended solely for use by the individual entity named as .he recipient hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware .ha. ary disclosure, copying, distribution, or use cf the contents o_` this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this ~ransmissien in error, please nctify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange tc retrieve this transmission at no cost to you. fir, TO: /~~-UUc ~E : /1 7~/CI.~Q-k DATE: (,<,.<-CUJ-f a23,~L'Of~ TOTAL NL?1BF.R OF PACES INCLUDING COVER SriEET ~ IF T3PNSMISSION IS FAULTY CR INCOMPLfiTE, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. J7 CLIENT NAME:~//~G)/ O P E RATOP.: I rr(.C-.(~..L.1-/i ,~s PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski MelissaMcC3owan Secretaries July 22, 2004 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n P.O.Box 1179 D I I Southold, NY 11971 II„JI (BY HAND) JUL l ~ Att: Bruno Re: Stanley Malon Southard town 1000-97-5-4.5 Planning Boa~~ Dear Bruno: Enclosed please find 2 sets ofproposed plans for development on the subject property. The Site Plan has been revised to reflect the changes requested. I have highlighted the following changes for your convenience: 1. More buffer along Rt.25 (push out pazking towards the building) 2. Land bank pazking in the back along the rear property line- the pazking has been redefined to assure you that there is room for parking if required later 3. The parking spaces have been realigned 4. The loading area has been clarified (it exceeds the minimum size) 5. The trellis shown on the ARC is on the site plan 6. The second sheet details the plants (landscape plan), lighting plan (height of light post specified) and sign design (lettering later) 7. You advised to give you only a few prints for internal review- if the plan is acceptable- we can provide you with additional prints once this plan is acceptable. After you have had an opportunity to review the plans, please place this matter before the Planning Board. I wish to be present when the Planning Board discusses the plan so please let me know when it is scheduled for review. Also the Health Department is actively reviewing this plan under reference number C 10-97- 5-4.5, John E. Fitzgerald is the staff reviewing engineer. The architect is checking with the DOT for their comments If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. Very trul yours, atricia C. Moore cc: Mr. & Mrs. Malon UffO( PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Og ~C JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE .r0~ CG P.O. Box 1179 Chair o y~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Z Southold, New York 11971-0359 RICHARD CAGGIANO T Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS G • ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MART N H. SIDORDS y~o! ~ ~aO~ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 21, 2004 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: RE: (1) Malon Site Plans (2) Oyster Factory Enclosed are the following extra Malon site plan maps for your files: 3 maps dated April 28, 2003 j 1 map last revised Feb. 27,2003 Also attached for your information is a memo dated May 18 from the Landmark Preservation Commission regarding Demolition of Oyster Factory in East Marion. Very tr you , Bru em Senior Site Plan Reviewer encs. PATRI~A C. MOORE, ATTORNEY LAW 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 B S oaTE 7 ~~Y TO / ~N~-` ` SUBJECT ~y~t-f~- (~/~C ~c~ o ~ ~ p D ; a ~ u r~ > > 2ooa ~ Southold Town _"--l Plannin Board SIGNE~ 'jQ_. i' S ~ ~l fl~ Q\ APP)1 ~LS BOARD MEMBERS ~ o~S~FFO(,~co ~ Southold Town Halle Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman ~ G'y~ 53095 Main Road Gerard P. Goehringer ~ dgg9 Lydia A. Tortora ~ • ~ D ~ ~ ! 11971-0959 Vincent Orlando y'~0 ' rl Tel. (631 765-1809 James Dinizio, Jr. 1 ~r 1~ i,~ MQY 2 4 F31 765-9064 i-... http://southoldtown.northfork.n t Southold Town Planning BoarA I BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DECISION MAY 20, 2004 MEETING Appeal No. 5383 -STANLEY MALON Property Location: 32845 Main Road, Cutchogue; CTM 97.5-4.5. Zone: B-Business. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 53,821 sq. ft. parcel has 150 ft. frontage along the Main Road (a/k/a NYS Rt. 25), depth of 362.92 ft. along the west side, 349.58 ft. along the east side, and 154.16 lin. ft. along the rear (northerly) lot line. The property is improved with an unoccupied single-family, two-story residence and accessory frame structure, shown on the November 7, 2001 survey prepared by Stanley J. Isaksen, Jr. The property is located in the B-General Business Zone District. BASIS OF APPLICATION: The basis of this Appeal is the Building Department's May 20, 2003 Notice of Disapproval, citing Code Sections 100-102 and 100-103C, in its denial of a building permit application concerning new construction for amultiple-use building on a 53,821 sq. ft. lot. The reasons cited in the Building Department's denial, states that the construction is not permitted because: (1) the bulk schedule requires a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet per use, and there are up to eight different proposed uses, and in addition, (2) the new construction notes 89 feet of linear footage instead of the code limitation of 60 linear feet. APPLICABLE CODE PROVISIONS: The sections of the Zoning Code, Chapter 100 noted in the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval read as follows: § 100-102. Bulk, area and parking requirements. No buildina or premises shall be used and no buildina or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loadlnp Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference wkh the same force anti effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full § 100-103. Front yard setbacks. [Added 8-22-1995 by L.L. No. 18-1995] C. A protect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (80) linear feet ~of frontage on one (11 street The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may vatprovided that the average setback of the Page 2 -May 20, 2004 • • ZBA NO. 5383-Stanley Malon CTM 97-5-4.5 at Cutchogue structures meets the setback required above and all buildings are at least seventy-five 175) feet from the right-of-way. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on September 25, 2003, December 18, 2003, February 26, 2004 and March 18, 2004, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant is desirous of building a new commercial building, and requests a variance to allow two 38' x 106' building areas connected by a second-floor mezzanine. In this respect, the Applicant requests: (1) Variances under Sections 100-102 and 100-103C, based on the Building Department's May 20, 2003 Notice of Disapproval concerning with less than 30,000 sq. ft. per use and with a building frontage greater than 60 linear feet, and (2) Interpretation of Section 100-102, Bulk Schedule, based on the Building Department's May 20, 2003 Notice of Disapproval, to determine that multiple occupancies do not require an additional 30,000 sq. ft. of land area per permitted use in the B-General Business Zone District. The applicant is proposing a building area with 89 linear feet wide and resulting in multiple commercial uses (common building area on a 53,821 sq. ft. parcel). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:AMENDED RELIEF: On December 4, 2003, the applicant submitted reasons and clarifying the request for an Interpretation of Section 100-102. The applicant clarified that a determination is requested from the Board, determining that multiple occupancies do not require an additional 30,000 sq. ft. of land area per permitted use in the B-General Business Zone District. The applicant is proposing one commercial structure with up to three different permitted uses with eight tenants/occupancies on this 53,821 sq. ft. parcel, as shown on the 12-11-03 Site Plan prepared by Harold E. Gebhard Architect. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: The 12-11-03 Site Plan prepared by Harold E. Gebhard, Architect, shows a proposed building area 9,496 sq. ft., Including 8,616 sq. ft. on the first floor and 880 sq. ft. for the second-floor mezzanine, and lot coverage of 17.8%. The two 38 ft. wide by 116 ft. deep building areas are connected by an 880 sq. ft. upper mezzanine. The number of uses vary, depending on the type and size necessary for each tenancy (retail, office, delicatessen, or other uses as may be authorized by codes.) ALTERNATIVE RELIEF: The Board determines that applicant's request is not the minimum necessary, and that there is an alternative available to reduce the overall length of the building. The building at each side may be reduced to 32 feet, reducing the amount of relief Page 3 -May 20, 2004 • • ZBA No. 5383-Stanley Malon CTM 97-5-4.5 at Cutchogue by f2 feet from the original 38 ft. as requested, resulting in a total linear footage of 78, reduced from the applicant's request of 89 feet. This reduction provides greater setbacks and greater areas for parking, fire lanes, landscaping and buffer areas. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: Area Variance for Alternate Relief 1. Grant of alternate relief will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The proposed design and alternate relief reduces the length of the building length, and the reduced size will blend into the neighborhood. The neighborhood consists of other similar businesses of offices and retail areas, and surrounding business zone districts with similar permitted uses. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. Without a variance, the necessary floor area to accommodate the prospective tenants and future occupants would not be possible. The floor areas for each use and tenant requires a minimum size and openness required for ADA access. 3. The alternate relief granted is somewhat substantial. The linear footage of the original request for 89 feet would result in 48% over the 60 ft. code limitation. The alternate relief for two 32 ft. sections, totaling 78 linear feet with the open 14' at the center for the second-floor meuanine, amounts to a lesser variance, or 30% of the code limitation of 60 ft. building frontage (width). It is also clear that the front side of the proposed building face is 64 feet in length showing the two 32 ft. wide full wall sections facing the street. 4. The difficulty was self-created when the new construction was planned without conforming to the current Town Code requirements. 5. During the hearings, concerns were raised about flooding due to poor drainage or soil conditions, and traffic. As to flooding and drainage, the applicants are submitting plans to mitigate potential adverse impacts to mitigate these concerns, which engineering information and plans will be reviewed during the final site plan process with various agencies. The conditions in this determination wilt ensure that the applicant shall prepare a final design that will properly contain water and runoff on this site without adverse impacts to surrounding areas, some of which are criteria listed in the September 5, 2003 letter from James A. Richter, R.A. in the Town's Engineering Department for proper contours of the land, additional drywall containment, sanitary system design requirements, and the like. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that the alternative relief granted herein will create any more traffic In Page 4 -May 20, 2004 • • ZBA No. 5383-Stanley Malon CTM 97-5-4.5 at Cutchogue this existing business district than what the applicant would be able to construct as a matter of right without a variance. 6. Grant of the alternate relief is the minimum necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a new building, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. Interpretation WHEREAS, Application No. 5383 also includes a written application dated December 4, 2003 for an INTERPRETATION of the Zoning Code, Article X, Section 100-102 "Bulk Area and Parking Schedule" to determine that multiple occupancies do not require an additional 30,000 sq. ft. of land area per permitted use in the B-General Business Zone District; and WHEREAS, after due notice public hearings were held by the Board of Appeals on December 18, 2003, February 26, 2004, and March 18, 2004 in the Assembly Room, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York to consider the applicant's Appeal of the Building Department's May 20, 2003 Notice of Disapproval; and WHEREAS, at said hearings all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded, and WHEREAS, all testimony has been carefully considered; and WHEREAS, Section 100-102 "Bulk Area and Parking Schedule" of the Zoning Code reads as follows: § 100-102. Bulk, area and parking requirements. No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full. EN BOARD RESOLUTION: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Tortora, seconded by Chairwoman Oliva, and duly carried, TO INTERPRET and ANSWER the question relative to Section 100-102 regarding whether or not a minimum of 30,000 sq. ft. of land area applies to each use or occupancy, as follows: NO, that Section 100-102 does not require an additional 30,000 sq. ft. of land area ' Page 5 -May 20, 2004 • • ZBA No. 5383 -Stanley Malon CTM 975-4.5 at Cutchogue per permitted use in the B-General Business Zone District, because Section 100-102 clearly states that "...no building or part thereof shall be erected ...in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Since the Buik Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules for the General Business `B' Zone District provide for a minimum requirement of 30,000 sq. ft. of land area, this requirement is interpreted to apply to each building, rather than to each use or occupancy within building areas that was noted in the Building Department's May 20, 2003 Notice of Disapproval; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, TO DENY the area variance application, as applied for, and to GRANT ALTERNATE RELIEF for two combined 32' linear footages, plus 14 ft. open connection by an upper meuanine, for an overall linear footage not exceeding 78 feet for the new building construction, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. Drywelis and other basins shall be properly designed by an engineer and installed to contain rainwater and other water runoff within the boundary of this site, to minimize any future impact of run-off onto adjacent properties; 2. The minimum side yard setbacks shall be 32 feet on the west side, and 28 feet on east side. 3. There shall be an unobstructed fire access for a minimum 20 ft. clearance on the west side and minimum 18 ft. clearance on the east side. 4. Building height shall be limited as requested to one-story plus a single meuanine centered between the two building sections. 5. Building width shall be limited to 32 feet on each of the two sides and open center 14 feet wide for a center (upper, one-story) meuanine (resulting in a total maximum length of 78 feet). This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and • Page 6 -May 20, 2004 • • ZBA No. 5383 -Stanley Malon CTM 97-5-4.5 at Cutchogue other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Tortora, Orlando, and Dinizio. (Absent was Member Goehringer.) ~s Re~s..o~lution was d~u~ly~ adopted (4-0). Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 5/21/04 Approved for Filing ?004 14 50 SON, POPE ~ LLP ~ 516 425 1257 P. 02 S. Melon property, Cutchogue Grading and Draimge Ravtew ` NPBcV M04063 5 C) t~~..il GRADING AND DRAINAGE REVIEW r S, MALON PROPERTY @ CUTCAOGtJE MAR 1 ~ 2004 ;s ZprylN Prepared for: Linda Kowalski G BopRO Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, Town hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-0959 Prepared by: Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 Date: March 9, 2004 The Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals has retained Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) for consulting services in review of the S. Melon site plan with respect to drainage (both on-site and off-site influence), grading and the potential impacts to adjacent properties for the above referenced application. The proposed action Involves the demolition of the existing structures on a 1.24 acre parcel in Cutchogue to allow for the development of a two (2) commercial structures and associated site improvements. Five retail stores, three offices, and a delicatessen are the proposed uses within the commercial structures. The site currently contains a two story residence and shed near the road frontage, with the remainder of the site containing early successional vegetation and a wooded fringe along the perimeter. This document analyzes the proposed grading and drainage as a result of the development and its associated impact to and from adjacent properties. Location and Site Overview The overall project site is located on the north side of Main Road (NXS Route 25), 83.35 feet west of Cox's Lane in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The subject property can be more particularly described as SCTM number 1000-97-05-04.5. The 1.24 acre parcel contains a total of approximately 150 feet of frontage on Main State Road (NYS 25) and is partially developed with a 2 story residence, a wood shed and associated access drive. The Page t MRR-17-2004 1450 ~SON.POPE.LLP 516 425 1257 P.03 • s. Melon Property, GYrtchogrx Grading and Drainage Iteview NPdcV t104063 remainder of the site consists of early successional vegetation and a wooded fringe exists along the northern, eastern and western site boundaries. The site is relatively flat along the southern developed perimeter, although contains an elevated mound in the central portion of the site as a result of prior fill activities. The center of the site maintains an elevation of 16 feet above mean sea level (msl) and slopes downward towards the adjacent properties to the north, east and west creating low points with elevations ranging from 9 feet to 12 feet above msl. Although these areas of lower elevations did not contain wetland vegetation, it is anticipated that stormwater runoff periodically ponds in these locations. Based on test hole data depicted on the Site Plan, the groundwater elevation is 3 feet above msl. Therefore, the depth to groundwater ranges from 13 feet below the ground surface in the central portion of the site to a minimum of 6 feet below the ground surface near the central portion of the eastern property boundary. The site is zoned General Business `B', as are the properties to the east and west. The property to the north is zoned `LB', north of which is `A-C' zoning. R-80 and RO zoning are located on the south side of Main Road. The adjacent properties on the north side of Main Road are developed with a variety of commercial uses, ranging from a medical center and retail development to the west, commercial retaillservice facility to the east, and a warehouse to the north- A cemetery is located south of the site on the south side of Main Road, east of which is a wetland depression/stream. This feature originates from a culvert located on the south side of Main Road, which is presumably connected to catch basins on Cox's Lane and Main Road, and ultimately discharges to East Creek. The wetland is not mapped as a 1VYSAEC regulated freshwater wetland; however appears to be mapped on the Town of Southold freshwater and Tidal 'Getlands Map. It is noted that this map is for resource purposes only and does not assume any regulatory authority. The Town Trustees regulate activities within 100 fees of freshwater wetlands and should determine whether a wetland permit will be necessary for the proposed project. Proposed Project The proposed acnon involves the demolition of the existing structures on site to allow for the development of a two (2) commercial structures and associated site improvements. The western most structure will contain a 1,121 s.f. delicatessen, a 948 s.f. retail store, and two (2) offices totaling 948 s.f. and 1,121 s.f. The eastern most structure will consist of four (4) retail stores with two (2) totaling 1,121 s.f, in size and the remaining two (2) totaling 1,033 s.f. Brick pavers will separate the structures, which will be connected in the center by a mezzanine that will house the owner's office (totaling 880 s.f). A total of 60 parking spaces (including 13 landbanked spaces) will be provided and are distributed to the north and south of the proposed structures. A total of 61.19 parking spaces are required as indicated on the Site Plan. A single site access will be provided from Main Road, located approximately 10 feet from the western property boundazy. An additiona124 foot wide access is provided along the western property boundary in the southern portion of the site, connecting the site to the commercial development to the west, The location of a future 24 foot wide cross-access to the adjacent site is also depicted near the eastern property boundary in the southern portion of the site, to allow traffic flow to and from the Page 2 MRR-17-2004 1451 ~SON,P~E,LLP • 516 425 1257 P.04 S. Maton Properly, Cutc6ogue Grading and 1)rai~ge Review NP&V M04a63 adjacent property to the east. Ten (10) foot wide landscaped areas will be established along the length of the eastern and western property boundaries and the undeveloped portion of the site along the nolthem property boundary is proposed to remain undisturbed. Gra ' and Drat a Considerations The site plan has bean reviewed with respect to grading and drainage and the potential impacts to adjacent properties. The proposed structures will have a finished floor elevation of 14.5 feet, with the parking area maintaining an elevation ranging from approximately 13 feet to 11.25 feet, gently sloping toward the east. Although earthwork calculations are not provided, it is anticipated that exportation of fill will be required as a result of building and drainage structtue excavations and to reduce the existing mound located in the central portion of the property. A two-tiered retaining wall system is proposed along the eastern property boundary, with each wall maintaining a height of approximately two feet in order to provide a grade transition to the low paint on the adjacent property. Comments and recotrunendations on site grading are provided herein: 1. The existing elevations along the e[utern property boundary in the center of the site appear inaccurate. a. An unlabeled existing cvntour line is indicated between elevation YO (on-site) and elevation 9 (off-site). This contour should 6e labeled and the adjacent eontours/existing spot elevations should be corrected as necessary. b. The existing 9 foot contour depicted off-sift does not coincide with the elevations provided on the Retaining Wall Detail (Landscape Plan) and should be corrected accordingly. 2. The bottom elevation of the proposed retaining walls should be indicated on the Sire Plan. 3. ft appears as if the retaining wall as depicted on the Retaining Wall Detail (Landscape Pian) extends slightly eastward beyond the property line. It is recommended that al! site construction and associated disturbance be conjined within the site boundaries and that offset from the property line be provided. The Alarming Board should determine if the construction of a retaining wall at the property boundary is acceptable. 4. The topographic contours and/or select spot elevations near the western property line should be provided to establish existing conditions and determine property grading and drainage design with respect to the site as well as the adjacent property. 5. Earthwork calculations should be provided to determine eut/,fill quanrities so that construction impacts con be addressed if necessary. Drainage calculations are provided, and indicate that eleven (11), 10 foot diameter drywells (d' depth) will be required to accommodate stormwater runoff. These drywells aze distributed throughout the paved areas on site and according to the typical drywell section, will maintain a two-foot separation distance t0 the underlying groundwater. Recommendations: 1. The applicant should provide documentation from the Town Engineering Department that design etiteria based on a 1 '/s" rain event is acceptable. According to Chapter A108-28, Highway Spec~arions of the Town of Southold Town Code, the design criteria should be based on a 2" rain event However, if a I ys" rain event is deemed acceptable, a multiplier Page 3 MRR-17-2004 14:51 ~SON~POPE~LLP 516 425 1257 P.05 Msbn property, Cutc6ogae - Grading and Ihatnage Review NP&V 1104063 of 0.125 should be utilized 2. The drainage calculations do not account for 2,328 sf. of brick pavers and should be revised accordingly, and additional drainage structures provided as necessary. 3. Although the drainage calculations indicate that starmwater from "undeveloped areas" and "landscaped areas" will be diverted w paving, it appears as though stormwater from these locations will be diverted off-site to adjacent properties. All site-generated stormwater runoff should be contained on site. 4. The 10 foot wide landscaped areas proposed along the eastern and western property boundaries (including tiered retaining wall system) should be graded such that overland, flow will not be directed toward adjacent properties. S. It is noted that the proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities at the site is anticipated to be greater than one (I) acre. New York State now requires consstruetion projects involving disturbances of I acre and greater to obtain coverage from NYS Department of Environmental Protection (AEC) under the Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Program. Specifically, the sate owner must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Stormwater Runoff from Construction Activity (GP-02-OI) prior to the initiation of construction activities. To obtain coverage under the General Permit, the site owner is required ro prepare an erosion control plan attd Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Permit information is avadlable from the DEC Region 1 office or the DEC website (http://www.dec.state.ny. us/website/dow/Phasell. html). S[1MMARY In conclusion, the proposed action involves the redevelopment of property to a commercial retail use. The site does not appear to contain sigatificant environmental features that would limit future development, provided adequate drainage and containment of on-site runoff are achieved and sanitary systems are properly designed and constructed. The site grading and drainage as currently proposed may result in the diversion of stormwater runoff to adjacent properties. It is recommended that the applicant address the issues stated herein and revise the Site Plan accordingly. Page 4 TOTAL P.05 09/24/2003 13:37 631765906A ZONINGAPPEALS}30ARD PAGE 03 - . ~ i . ,,pti~~ JOSI~IUA Y. NORTON d~` JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ~ ENGINEER tt)WN HAIR, • 53095 MAPI MAD yy ~ TOWN OF SOUTNOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Fu. (514) - 745 ^ 1344 G+ y Td. (514) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOID Bennett Orlowski, Jr. September 5, 2003 Chairtrlan -Planning Board Town Helt, 53095 Maln Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: MALON Commercial CenUSr SCTM 1000-97-05-4.5 Dear Mr. Orbwaki: As per your request, I have reviewed the site plan, Drawing # SP-1 dated 4l2S/03, for the above referenced project. The typical sections & details for the Parking Lot constnx4ion, as indicated by the plan, meet the minimum requirements of the Town Code. State Curb Cut Pemlits should be obtained by the c'evebper and submitted to the Planning Board prior to final approvals. Drainage design criteria listed in Town Code requires containment of a two (2") rainfall. Calculations should be revised and Rur1oN Coefficients "C"should be as follows: Roots 1.0 AsplTafl Pavement 1.0 Brick Pavers 0.6 Landscaped Areas 0.2 7rainage Calculations should be modified accordingly, Additional drywalls required by the revis~d ca1a11ations should be added at the property Hne along the proposed Curb Line Irnmediatefy adjacent to the Route 2b Entrarxe to miMmize the impact of run-0ff to the State Road. The proposed br:alions of six new drywalls, (three on each side), at the perimeter of the proposed structure is acceptable. The remaining drywaA structures should be consolidated in the parking bt areas at each end of the proposed cenatruction to albw for uniform pavement slopes. This wfli allow for oomtnon tow points in the parking lot areas and wNl prevent a washboard contouring that would be difflcttl! to grade. Clustered drywalls should be interconnected utilizing 15' diameter traffic bearing drainage Pipe• Contours indicated on the plan are difticuH to fellow and therefore the final rim elevations of drainage grates will ba d~cult to determine. Each individual drywall or set of leaching pools should be noted with rim elevations to determine final grade of pavement. Top & bottom Curb Ebvatlons should also tae Indicated a various intervals throughout the site to Insure proper drainage pitch t0 proposed drywall locations. If you have any questions oonceming this report, please confect my office. ce , a. . , D CC: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) 5EP - 5 2003 SnuthoM Town Plannl BerM PLANNING BOARD MEMB~S ~~gUFFO(,~cG JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Gy P.O. Box 1179 Chair C ~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 H Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO ~ • Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~ KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN H. SIDOR ~I ~ `~a PLANNING BOARD MEMB~S ~OgUFFU(,(-CO JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~j P.O. Box 1179 Chair o ~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGL4N0 y, ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MART N HESIDORDS yfJ~ ~ `1.a0`' PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: February 26, 2004 To: Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman Zoning Board of Appeals From: Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairperson Planning Board Re: Request for comments on Malon SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Appeal # 5383 In response to your request for comments, the Planning Board reviewed the aforenoted appeal at its February 25`h work session and determined the following: 1. While it is premature for the Planning Board to commnnt on those aspects or elements of the site plan that maybe modified as a rrsult of a decision by the Zoning Board of Appeals, it should be noted that the size, dimensions and varied uses of the proposed buildings will determine whether there is sufficient parking to handle whatever mix of uses maybe permitted. ~~rr ~L APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman P.O. Box 1179 Gerazd P. Goehringer Southold, New York 11971-0959 Lydia A. Tortora Telephone (631) 765-1809 Vincent Orlando ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Jaznes Dinizio http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Appeals DATE: February 23, 2004 SUBJECT: Request for Comments Presently, the Board of Appeals is reviewing the following application for a February 26, 2004 public hearing: NAME TAX # & ZBA BD NOD VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE DATEIS DATE MALON 97-5-4.5 5383 5/20/03 INTERPRETATION N/A N/A (RE-OPENED) B & MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY The Planning Board may be involved regarding apre-submission review under the site plan regulations of the Zoning Code. Your comments regarding the following are requested: • Landscaping • Drainage • Grading • Parking D 2 tyy ~ 0 • Size of building with respect to parking D FEB 2 3 2004 • Impervious surfaces on driveways Southold Town • Ingress and Egress PlanningBoar~ Tha ou. . RE~IEST FOR INFORMATI0I~R ASSISTANCE Date: ~ - si_o y Name: ~~-Moore Telephone: 7(0 y3 3 a Mailing Address: SCTM# of site you are inquiring about:_ M/~j,(~/1/ Query: (Please be specific about the information you need. Rrovide suppor~ng documentation -surveys, maps, sketches -where possible.) ~ ~~d ~ ~~~.e~` 2003 . ~ ~ cr~Y~a l ~ fias Q~~~~°1 C~~"c~~ ~ ~i lU,e~ ure.- h~ yam' G For Office Use Only: Routed to: ~l/3/Q~ ~ ~//z/ ~l/~.rs. /"~eorG .r?z~d r~r...! ~I.~S / ~ ~~S s~~~ ~ V a'.erc vd ~x ~ s~~'~' ~~Z,~l~~~ ~S ~u~~-. ~-v~~i~ ~~~1~~~ a ~o~ ~ ~ 5~~r PATRICIA C. MOORS ~5~? 1, Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 1 1971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 February 9, 2004 Michael Verity Building Inspector 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 (BY HAND) Re: Malon Commercial Building SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Michael: My client had submitted to the Planning Board and Zoning Board a revised site plan dated 12/22/03 which reduces the size ofthe restaurant to '/z the original space. We continue to show the other spaces as "retail" or "office" uses. Please review the notice of disapproval. An application for an interpretation of the code has been submitted to the ZBA based on the multiple use issue as well as a variance from the 60' rule. Enclosed is the revised site plan dated 12/~z/03 for your convenience. Very'°tryily,~ours, ^E l Patricia C. Moore C' C ; ..j • ~ m, APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town I~r 53095 Main Road Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman P.O. Box 1179 Gerard P. Goehringer Southold, New York 11971-0959 Lydia A. Tortora Telephone (631) 765-1809 Vincent Orlando ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 James Dinizio http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Appeals DATE: February 3, 2004 SUBJECT: Request for Comments Presently, the Board of Appeals is reviewing the following applications for a February 26, 2004 public hearing: NAME ZBA DISAPPROVAL VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER DATE/S DATE DCE LAND 5472 8/18/02 LOT SIZE VARIANCE N/A N/A HOLDINGS 9/5/03 DUE TO PROPOSED 136-1- 12/19/03 LOT LINE CHANGE 20,21,22,24.1 OF 2 SEPARATE LOTS TOWBEE 5492 1/26/04 MULTIPLE USES ON N/A N/A 63-2-30.1 77,070 SO FT RE-OPENED 5383 5/20/03 INTERPRETATION & N/A N/A MULTIPLE RE-OPENED OCCUPANCY The Planning Board may be involved regarding apre-submission review under the site plan regulations of the Zoning Code. Your comments regarding this pending application are requested. By wav of a copv of this letter, the applicant is requested to submit a current site plan to your Department if it hasn't already been submitted in apre-submission review. Thank you. Enclosures, BD NOD, ZBA application D ~ ~ ~ ~ U cc: Martin Finnegan, Esq. 727-1767 FEB - n D Abigail Wickham, Esq. 298-8565 4 2C~4 Patricia Moore, Esq. 765-4643 Southold Town Planning Beam ' ~ ~ 'Oy ~ ~ I ,~oJ ~~o C{~ FORM N0.3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: August 18, 2003 AMENDED: September 5, 2003 ~r+-~+ RENEWED: December 19, 2003 ~p..o~ A,.v,_ TO. Twomey, Latham, Shea & Kelly A/C DCE Land Holdings LLC 33 West Second Street Riverhead, NY 11901 Please take notice that your application dated August 18, 2003 For permit lot line chance at O~ G(T' Location of property 2725 Harbor Lane, Cutchogue County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 136 Block 1 Lot 20, 21, 22.24.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed lot line change to these non-conforming parcels in the Residential R-40 District is not permitted, pursuant to Article IIIA Section 100-30A.3 ,which states; "No building or premises shall be used and no building or }part thereof shall be erected or altered in the Low Density Residential R-40 District unless the same conforms to the reouirements of the Bulk Schedule and of the Parking Schedule with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein full." Bulk schedule requires that such pazcels measure no less than 40 000 square feet in total size Following ~e proposed lot line change p_azcel one (which currently measures 36 839 square feet will measure 30 604 and parcel two (which currently measures 32 437 square feet) will measure 38 672 sic care feet. This Notice of Disapuroval was amended on September 5, 2003, to take out the waiver of mercer ~ at the request of the applicant who does not wish to ask for a waiver of merger at this time, with respect to the rear portion of arcel 2. 'poi- r'~ prized igna e CC: file, Z.B.A. • • ~ • ~ APPLICATION TO THE SOUTI30LD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS _ For Office Use Only Fee: $ Filed By:_ Dnte Assigned/Assignment No. Office Notes: Parcel Location: House No.2_Z2,~ Street Harbor Lane Hamlet Cutchogue 20, 21, 22 (Parcel 1-26,839;Parcel 2 SCTM 1000 Section 136 Blockl Lot(s)24i 1 Lot Size 32,437 Zone District R-40 I (WE) APpFAr. THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: I'2 ~ 1 t lei Applicant/Owner(s): nrv 7 d Hnldin il['/R hart T_ Darncki Ra_ynr ably Tr»5t Mailing Address: 2835 Harbor Lane CutchoQUe New York Telephone: 734-6633 NOTE: If applicant is not the owner, stale If npplicanl Ls owner's ntlorney, agent, architec<, builder, contra<I vendee, etc. Autborized Representative: Martin D. Finnegan, Esq. Twomey, Latham, Shea & Kelley, LLP Address: 33 West Second Street, P.O. Box 9398, Riverhead, New York 11901 Telephone:~~ ~ ~ Please specify who you wish correspondence tb be mailed to, from the above listed names: ? Applicant/Owner(s) GlAuthorized Representative D Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 8/18/03 FOR: ? Buuding Permit. ? Certificate of Occupancy DPre-Certificate of Occupancy ? Change of Use ? Permit for As-Built Construction Other: Lot line modification Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article 7TTA Section 100- 30A Subsection 3 Type of. Appeal. An Appeal is made for: ~ A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ? A Variance doe to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ? Interpretatlon of the Town Code, Article Section ? Reversal or Other A prior appeal ? has ~ has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. -Year ~ ,r, ~ 1 ~ • • • • • 1 . Page 2 of 3 • Appeal Appllcatlon Parf A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (affach extra sheet as needed): (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, If granted, because: See Exhibit "A" (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: See Exhibit "A" (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: See Exhibit "A" (4) The varlance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental condifions In the neighborhood or district because: See Exhibit "A" (5) Has the varlance been self-created? ( )Yes, or (X) No. If not, is the construction existing, os built? ( )Yes, or ( ) No. (6) Additional information about the surrounding topography and build(ng areas that relate to the difficulty In meeting thea code requirements: (affach extra sheet as needed) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserves and protects the character of the neighborhood and the health, sofety, and welfare of the community. ( )Check this box and complete RT B, Questl ns on next page to apply USE VARIANCE STANDARDS. (Rlease consult yo ey.) Oth lease roceed to the sl nature a notary area below. Sign ur ppellant or Authorized Agent /Sv(orn to bf~fore met is ( ust s bmit Authorization from Owner) ~d of .l~R,fdJ.~:? to Publle) earw c. ww oorr ~f'~~~Ik~N.wrbAc Quel hl County ZBA App 9/30/02 Commission Expkea May 5, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS --------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of DCE Land Holdings, LLC and the Robert J. Deroski Revocable Trust --------------------------------------------------------------------X MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DCE LAND HOLDINGS, LLC IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This Memorandum of Law is submitted on behalf of DCE Land Holding LLC., ("DCE") and Betty R. Deroski as Trustee of the Robert J. Deroski Revocable Trust ("Deroski") for a modification of the Lot-Line currently existing between the applicants' respective properties. DCE is the owner of the parcel identified on the Suffolk County Tax Map as No. 1000-136-1-20 (hereinafter referred to as Lot 1). Deroski is the owner of the parcels identified by Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-136-1-21, 22 and 24.1. (hereinafter referred to as Lot 2). As depicted on the attached survey map, Lot 2 was initially comprised of sub-lots 21 and 22 only, however, those lots have merged with sub-lot 24.1 by operation of law. For the reasons set forth below, DCE and Deroski submit that the variance sought should be granted. STATEMENT OF FACTS As depicted on the attached Map, Lot 1 is currently comprised of sub lots 99-105. Lot 1 is improved with asingle-family dwelling. Lot 2 is comprised, in pertinent part, of sub-lots 93-98. Lot 2 also includes sub-lot 24.1 by merger. The existing Lot-Line between Lots 1 and 2 bisects sub lots 98 and 99. With this 7 application, DCE and Deroski propose to move the existing Lot Line from its current location to the line bisecting sub-parcels 100 and 101. (See attached map). The subject parcels are located in the Low Density Residential (R-40) Zoning District where parcels are required to be no less than 40,000 square feet. However, the majority of the neighboring lots are substandard with most being one half acre or less. Lots 1 and 2 are also substandard within the R-40 Zone. At its current dimensions, Lot 1 is 36,839 square feet. Lot 2, as a result of the merger, is currently 32,437 square feet. If the modification is approved, the resulting Lot 1 will be 30,604 square feet leaving Lot 2 larger at 38,672 square feet. As such, a variance of 23.5% is needed for Lot 1 to effectuate the Lot Line modification. The applicants request a variance from the requirements of Article IIIA of the Southold Town Code, Section 100-30A.3 which provides: "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the Low Density residential R-40 District unless the same conforms to the requirements of the Bulk Schedule and of the Parking Schedule, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein full". Specifically, the applicants seek a variance from the Bulk schedule which requires that any such parcel be "no less than 40,000 square feet in total size'. A Notice of Disapproval reflecting these requirements was issued to the applicants on August 18, 2003 and amended on September 5, 2003. 2 ARGUMENT THE APPLICANTS HAVE SATISFIED THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE REQUESTED AREA VARIANCE Pursuant to Section of the Southold Town Code and Section 267-b of the Town Law, the Zoning Board of Appeals must consider in determining whether to grant an application for an area variance whether the benefit to the applicant by grant of the requested variance outweighs the detriment of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or the surrounding community. When the conducting the weighing analysis set forth above, the Board is also charged with considering the following five factors: 1. Whether an undesirable change will be uroduced in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby~roperties will be created by grant of the area variance. The applicants submit that the grant for the requested variance will not create an undesirable change in the neighborhood nor a detriment to the value of nearby properties. The relief granted by the applicants is simple and straight forward. The applicants seek only to move the lot line between Lots 1 and 2 resulting in a de minimis change to the dimensions of each lot. As for Lot 1, the proposed modification will result in a parcel measuring 30,604. square feet. Since Lot 1 is improved with a single family dwelling, •the modification will result in a lot which is more conforming with the character of the existing neighborhood where most lots are approximately one-half acre in size. Conversely, the resulting Lot 2, which is vacant land, will become substantially 3 conforming in the low density residence R-40 zone. The applicants can perceive no detriment to any nearby property if the variance is granted. 2. Whether the benefits sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method feasible for the apvlicant to pursue other than an area variance. Although the existing lots are already substandard and non-conforming, in light of the current zoning classification, the applicant cannot effectuate the proposed lot-line modification in the absence of the relief requested from the Zoning Board of Appeals. 3. Whether the requested area variance is substantial. The requested area variance is in no way substantial. The variance requested for Lot 1 from the 40,000 square foot requirement is 23.5%. As for Lot 2, the dimensions will actually increase to a size within 3% of the required square footage. 4. Whether the requested area variance will have an adverse impact on the ~hvsical and environmental conditions of the neighborhood. The requested variance will in no way have an adverse impact on the environment and will, in fact, improve the physical conditions of the neighborhood. The applicants submit that the modification will bring the improved Lot 1 into conformity with the neighboring lots which are for the most part, half-acre lots. In addition, the modification will cause Lot 2, which is now vacant to be more conforming within the R-40 zone. Since no construction is contemplated on Lot 2, the applicants perceive no immediate environmental impact. 4 5. Whether the alleged difficulty was self-created. While the applicant concedes that the low density residential district was created before they took title, it is submitted that the issue of self-creation is not determinative here. In light of the de minimis relief requested, the applicant submits that the issue of self-creation should be disregarded by the Zoning Board of Appeals. CONCLUSION The applicants respectfully request that the requested variance for Lot 1 from the bulk schedule requirements be granted and the that the lot line modification be approved. The applicants submit from a planning perspective, the modification of this lot line will serve the dual purpose of maintaining the character of the surrounding community where creating a substantially conforming lot in the low density residential zone with no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Dated: December 18, 2003 Riverhead, New York Y, LA AM, SHEA & KELLEY,LLP. orn for A plicant B TIN D. FINNEGAN Second Street P.O. Box 9398 Riverhead, NY 11901 (631)727-2180 5 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? ? Yes l}No B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? ? Yes i~No C. 1) Are there any areas that contain wetland grasses? No 2) Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with this application? N /A 3) Is the property bulk: headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? N/A 4} If your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? N/A D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea lc;vel? N /A (If not applicable, state "n/a".) E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? No (If none exist, please state "none". ) F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? No If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department. If none, please state. Seq $xhib'i G. Do you or any co-owirer also own other land close to this parcel? A ~>tyes, please explain where or submit topics of deeds. H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this pazcel varanr ~ anA /~truc *ures and proposed use same ) O th ed Signature and Date I 1.',.. ' ~ ~ PROTECT I.D. NUMBER ~ 3EQR 6]7.21 Appendix C State Environmeniaf Quality Review SHORT ENVIRO/VMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I -Project Information (To be complete by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. Applicant /Sponsor 2. Project Name DCE LAND HOLDING, LLC DCE DEROSKI Lot Line Modification 3. Project location: Municipality Gounfy Southold Suffolk. 4. Precise loratlon (SUee[ address and road Inlersectlons, prominenl landmad<s, etc. or provide map) 2725 Harbor Lane, Cutchogue, NY, at intersection of Harbor and Oak Street 5. Is proposed action: ( )NEW ( )EXPANSION ( )MODIFICATION /ALTERATION N/A 6. Descdbe project briefly: Movement of Lot Line which now lies between sub-parcels 98 and 99 to the line between sub-parcels 100 and 10.1. 7. Amount of land affected: Initially: acres ; UIIlmately: acres .85 Lot 1 .70 acres /Lot 2 initially .74 ultimately .89 8. WIII proposed action comply with e>dstlng or oNer existing land use restdcllons:( )YES ( ) NO If No, descdbe briefly: The lots are substandard in the R-40 Zone but conforming with surrounding lots. 9. What Is present land use in vicinity of proiecc (describe): ( )Residential ( ) IndusMal ( )Commercial ( ) Agdcultural ( ) ParWForesVOpen Space ( )Other 10. Does action Involve a permit approval or funding, now or ultimately from any other Governmental agency,(Federal, State or Local)? ( )YES (•.X) NO If Yes, list agency(s) and permlUepprovals: f 11. Does any aspect of the action have a cunently valid permit or approval? ( )YES ( ) NO If Yes, Ilst agenr:y(s) and pennlUapprovals: 12, As a result of proposed action, will existing permltlapproval require modification? . { )YES ( ) NO It Yes list agency(s) and pennlVapprovals: _ 1 certify that the information provided above Is true to the best of my knowledge Appll on a :Twomey Latham Shea & Kelley. LLP Date: Y: Martin D. Finne an Signature: If the acfio n the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessT i DATE: January 26, 2004 TO: Gail Wickham A/C Tow Bee LLC PO Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Please take notice that your application dated January 26, 2004 For permit for a contractor's yazd and building at a O Location of property: 700 Hummel Avenue, Southold, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 63 Block 2 Lot 30.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Theprouosed use, on this 77,070 square foot lot, with two front yazds, in the LI District, is not permitted pursuant to Article V1II, Section 100-82A, which states; "Except as otherwise provided hereon, no buildings or premises shall be used and no building or Hart thereof shall be erected or altered in the LB District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Pazking and Loadinl? Schedules incor~rated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such reQ.ttlations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule allows one use Her 40,000 squaze feet. The use, as pronosed, would constitute a second use. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, following any ZBA decision~n~y""require ~ttrther review by the Southold Town Building Department. / Authorized Signature CC: file, Z.B.A., Planning Dept. Builders License No. Plumbers License No. Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. t. '1r ~ APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS For Office Use Only Fee: $ FileA By; Date Assigned/Assignment No. Office Notes: Parcel Location: House No. 700 Street xummel Avenue Hamlet Southold SCTM 1000 Section 63 Bliiclc 2 Lot(s) 30.1 Lot Size 74053sf Zone District LI I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: January 2004 Applicant/Owner(s): TOWBEE, LLC Mailing c/o Abigail A. Wickham Address: PO Box1424, Mattituck, NY 11952 Telephone: 631-298-8353 1~~. 631-298-8565 NOTE: If applitant is not the owner, stale if applicant Is owner's attorney, agent, architect, builJep contract venJeq eh. Authorized Representative: East End Drafting and Design Address: PO sox 1675, Southold, NY 11971 Telephone: 631-765-1862 Y~--t~: ,631-765-6820 Please specify who you wish correspondence tb be mailed to, from the above listed names: C31Applicant/Owner(sl or,t] Authorized Representative ? Other: (Abigail A. Wic am WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED ~ ~ z b ~0~{ FOR: ? Building Permit. ? Certificate of Occupancy ?Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ? Change of Use ? Permit for As-Built Construction ~ Dual use property with insufficient area Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article V 1 I ~ Section 100- $Z/.~. Subsection Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: 9 A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ? A Variance due to lack of access requfred by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. 0 Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section~ ~ReversalorOther~rm,na~i0v~ -H~a~l- yavtahip. hat- YPCt.t.veP.A. A prior appealkEdtas 0 has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No.S355Year 2003 . , • , Page 2 of 3 • Appeal Application Part A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (attach extra sheet as needed): (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted, bBCpuse: this property has had multiple light industrial-uses since prior to enactment of the zoning ordinance. The new office and ac~essfor Stora a/warehouse use on the east sicje (Buildings 1/2/3) is new and an (~~gfhe benef~t soug~i~ bq the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: the uses by more than one user have historically continued. (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: the uses in Buildings 1/2/3 will be quieter, more attractive, and self contained, and conducted inside the buildings. (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or,impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: of the same reasons set forth above. Has the variance been self-created? ( )Yes, or (x) No. If not, is the construction exisHn~, as built? ( x) Yes, or ( ) No. 11,~ contractor warehouse/storage building on aaskwest sand onepienova~edng'twow~oe~esa~~eduaaage~sp°rioia'~~Asappfova~e building to be removed (6) Additional information about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate to the ditflculty in meeting the code requirements: (attach extra sheet as needed) This is a light industrial zone which has always had multiple users; the building department believes a variance is required despite the pre-existing nature of the multiple users. This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserves and protects the charaeter of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. ( )Check this box and complete PART B, Questions on next page to apply USE VARIANCE STANDARDS. (Please consult your attorney.) Ot rwise lease roceed to the si ature a notary area below. Sign re of Appellant or Authorize Agent Sw rn t bet me this (Agent must submit Authorization from Owner) ay 200 ary Public) DONNA McaAHAN N~ryNo b01 MC48S 489 Ybfk ZBA App 9/30/02 Cualifled in Suffolk County Commission Expires Aup. 18, 2006 PR018Cr LO. NUha3EA ' SEAR lIZ21 Appendix C State Envfronmenta! Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I -Project Information (To be complete by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. Applicant /Sponsor 2. Project Name TOWBEE, LLC SeaTOw Corporate HQ 3. Project IocaUon: Municipality County Southold Suffolk 4. Precise IocaUon (SUeet address and road Intersections, prominent landmarks, etc. or provide map) 700 Hummel Avenue, Southold, N.Y. 11971 5. Is proposed actlon: ~ - ( )NEW ( )EXPANSION (x) MODIFICATION 7 ALTERATION 6. Describe project briefly: - Multiple use light industrial property; one use is changing to office/accessory storage as set forth in prior application for setback and related variances 7. Amount of land affected: inlUally. acres; Ultimately: acres 77,000 sq. ft. same - 8. WIII proposed action wmply with e>dstlng or other e>astlng land use restrictlons:(X )YES ( ) NO If No, describe bnefly: 9. What Is present land use in vicinity of project: (describe): ) Residentlal ( )Industrial ( )Commercial ( )Agricultural ( ) Park/Forest/Open Space ( )Other Mixed fight industrial, commercial and residential (single family and multiple residence) 10. Does action Involve a permit approval or funding, now or ultimately from any other Govammental agency,(Faderal, State or Local) ? ( )YES (g) NO If Yes, list agency(s) and penniUapprovals: s 11. Does any aspect of the actlon have a cunenlly valid permit or approval? . ( )YES (x) NO If Yes, Ilst agency(s) and pennit/approvals: Pending; Prior ZBA approval. 12. As a result of proposed action, will existing pennNapproval require modiflcatlon? ( )YES ( j;NO If Yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals: 1 certify that he Infortnadon provided above Is true ro the best of my knowledge Applicant /Sponsor Name: Date: Signature: II the actlon Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with fhls assessme PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Please include with Z.B.A. Application) Applicant(s): Towhee, LLC I. If building is existing and alterations/additions/renovations are proposed: A. Please give the dimensions and overall square footage of extensions beyond existing building` Dimensions/size: 1)office: 60X80 2)Storage 40X70 3)covered walkways 20X15+24X5 Square footage: 1) 2) 3) B. Please give the dimensions and square footage of new proposed foundation areas which do not extend beyond the existing building Dimensions/size: Square footage: II. If land is vacant: Please give dimensions and overall square footage of new construction: Dimension size: Square footage: Height: III. Purpose and use of new construction requested in this application: office .and storage- N. Additional information about the surrounding contours or nearby buildings that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): V. Please submit seven (7) photos/sets after staking comers of the proposed new construction. See prior application 7/02 Please note.• Further changes; after submitting the above information, must be placed in writing and may require a new Notice of Disapproval to show changes to the initial plans. If additional time is needed, please contact our office, orplease check with Building Department (765-1802) or Appeals Department (765-1809) if you are notsure. Thank you. QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? ? Yes [3rNo B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land•contours? ? Yes L3rNo C. I) Are there any areas that contain wetland grasses? 2) Are the wetland azeas shown on the map submitted with this application? 3) Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? 4) If your property contains wetlands or pond azeas, have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five Feet above mean sea level'?nc (If not applicable, state "n/a".) E. Are there any patios, concrete barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and aze not shown on the survey map that you aze submitting? (If none exist, please state "none".) Revisions proposed as per site plan -new fencing, landscaping, etc. F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premisesT yP s If yes, please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department. If none, please state. pending G. Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this pazcel7 yes If yes, please explain where of submit espies of deeds. parcel immediately to West H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this pazcel 1) storage&contractors yards and proposed use 2)office/storage for Seatow & contractor's s orage yar >n west building to continue Au rized Signature and Date PLANNING BOARD MEMIS~ ~OgOfFU(,YCO JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~0 P.O. Box 1179 Chair C y~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO ~ • Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR ~~l ~ `~aO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE MEMORANDUM Towly of souTxoLD Amended Date: January 23, 2004 To: Ms. Oliva, Chairwoman of Zoning Board o peals From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Review r ~j'~ Re: Proposed site plan for the Malon Multi Use Building Main Road, Cutchogue, N.Y. SCTM: 1000-97.-5-4.5 In reference to the above site plan application, attached you will find information received from NYS DOT dated January 13, 2004. Please keep us up to date on the advances of this project in your department. Thanking you in advance. Cc: file, pb, enc. PLANNING BOARD L~BE~ \,O$UffU~~CO • JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE P.O. Box 1179 Chair C y~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO y. • ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN HESIDORDS 'yif/ol ~ ~~0`' PLANNING BOARD OFFICE MEMORANDUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: January 23, 2004 To: James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Proposed site plan for the Malon Multi Use Building Main Road, Cutchogue, N.Y. SCTM: 1000-97.-5-4.5 Status: Active site plan pending Town ZBA approval and final Planning Board approval. In reference to the above site plan application, attached you will find information received from NYS DOT dated January 13, 2004. Please add this information to the site plan sent to you on May 15, 2003. Thank you in advance. Cc: file, pb Enc. • • • ~4~ p C~~~od~ ~ STATE OF NEW YORK JAN 1 w 2~p4 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWA Southold TOwn HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 1 1 788-55 1 8 Planning Board SU BIMAL CHAK RA BORTI, P.E. JOSEPH H. BOA RDMAN REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER January 13, 2004 Ms. Patricia C. Moore, Esq. Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Your December 18.2003 Submission Commercial Project for Stanley Malon Site Plans Dated 12/11/03. Last Revision 12/8/03 Route 25. Cutchoeue SCTM 100-97-5-4.5 Our Case No. 03-336P Dear Ms. Moore: This is in regazd to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. We also received a submission on 12/29/03 from the architect for this project, Mr. Harold E. Gebhazd. The site plans submitted with his cover memo are dated 12/22/03. The following comments will address that submission as well, however, in order to provide a comprehensive, expedited review of this matter we respectfully request that future submissions for this project be submitted [o us through one designated contact person. Prior to an approval of the site's access and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. A note shall be added to the plans requiring the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the Route 25 site frontage at the completion of construction. 2. Shoulder re-construction will be required for a minimum of the driveway width plus twenty- five (25) feet on each side of the proposed access point. Please have the architect show these limits on the plans and correct the asphalt concrete depths to 1-1/2"Top course; 2-1/2"binder course; 6" base course. 3. Provisions shall be made to change the existing drywell drainage structure on Route 25 to a curb inlet drainage structure. Please have the azchitect include all the details for this on the plans referencing all work and material details to NYSDOT specification item numbers. 4. All sidewalk along the site frontage shall be re-constructed to a minimum 5 foot width as per current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. Please have the architect show these limits on the plans. All proposed material to be used between the sidewalk and the curb Ms. Patricia C. Moore January 13, 2004 Page 2 shall be shown on the plans referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers. In addition, all sidewalk pedestrian ramps shall be constructed with a detectable warning field as per current ADA requirements. Please have the azchitect include all details on the plans referencing all work and material details to NYSDOT specification item numbers. 5. A driveway profile or on site elevations, including elevations at the State highway right-of- wayline, shall be shown on the plans to insure that all drainage is contained on site since we do not permit runoff from property onto the State highway. 6. The site plans shall show all of the correct pavement markings for Route 25 at this location. The travel lane/shoulder edge line shall be shown correctly for both travel directions. All stop lines shall be shown correctly on the plans. 7. The Maintenance and Protection of Traffic (MPT) plan shall be shown correctly for this site. The plan shown is not applicable for the proposed work at this site since shoulder re- construction will require occupying a portion of the westbound travel lane. A lane shift scheme or lane closure scheme would be more appropriate. Please have the azchitect review the attached examples and apply the correct MPT plan for this site. The plan must include the note "All lanes must be open to traffic before 9 AM and after 3 PM. No lane closings are permitted on weekends or holidays. Nighttime lane closings will not be permitted without prior approval from the State Permit Inspector." 8. The plan must include the note "Repair existing shoulder, sidewalk and curbing as ordered by State Engineer." 9. A note shall be added to the plans stating which consecutive reference mazkers the site falls between or the reference mazkers shall be shown on the plan. 10. Any utility work proposed in State Highway right-of-way will require separate application and submission of plans (installation details, restoration details and Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan -all referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) to our Riverhead Maintenance facility. The applicant may contact Mr. Kevin Matthaei at (631) 727-1731 for further directions regazding Utility Highway Work Permit (HWP)applications. The applicant should be made aware that utility HWP issuance is subject to issuance of the HWP required for site work. Please submit four sets of revised plans. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mazk Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regazding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Ms. Patricia C. Moore Januazy 13, 2004 Page 3 Very truly yours, Oo i~;ti Signed Qy SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachments cc: ~Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director/Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Planning Board Office, Town of Southold Mr. Peter Hams, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Mr. Harold E. Gebhard, Architect, 363 N. Wellwood Ave., Lindenhurst, NY 11757 SAS:MW:DW ioo' aao' isoo' cll-zc wB-zz w1-lt wB-B wl-n we-e wB-1 E R4-6 yt3 t~ D)OE OE PAVED SHOULDER 3~ e a isoo' aeo' ~ Ca EOCE OE PAVELIpIf- EOEE Of PAVEMENT- E O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O p EOGEMP ~ ~ O ~ -EGGS OE PAVEMENT- ~ ~ ~ EDGE Of PAVFO BHWIDEA WORK ZONE SO' 4 WB-1 WB-8 W1-11 WB-B W1-11 WB-2Z R4-B C11-ZC ROADWAY OPENING IS WIDE ENWGH TD ACCDMMDDgE ONE LANE 1YI0 WAY TMFi1C WffH FLAGMAN . § 302.13 TITLE 17 TRANSPORTATION § 302.13 7Yaffic control at short duration work area on a one-way roadway-Figure 302-13. All lanes must be open to traffic before 9 AM and after 3 PM. No lane closings are permitted on weekends or holidays. Nighttime lane closings will not be permitted without prior approval from the State Permit Inspector. FIGURE 302-13 EXAMPLE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL AT SHORT DURATION WORK AREA ON A ONE-WAY ROADWAY ~O F ~1; s ~ae• 500 Fr ~ OdD FT ~soo Fr 0 Notes: t. SN esctrona 237.4, 233.5, 238.2. 239.4 54.2, 294.5, 301.2, mid subchapter G. 2. Legend: •a• Arrow panel ~ Cone ~ Flsg troe ®Work aros 3. Fm transition length, L, see section 30Y.12 PLANNING BOARD MEl~l[s ~gUFFO(,~ BENNETT ORLOWSI?Z, JR. Q CD P.O. Box 1179 Chairman CQ Town Hall, 5309b State Route 26 Southold, New York 11971-0969 RICHARD CAGGL4N0 ~ ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS O ~ ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN HESI OARDS ~,~Ol ~ dap! PLANNING BOARD OFFICE MEMORANDUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: January 12, 2004 To: Planning Board Members and Valerie Scopaz From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer/~~ Re: Email dated January 9, 2004 from the Z.B.A. For your information in reference to the above, I copied and pasted the text of the email below. Please review and forward any comments or concerns about the attached. Good Morning, Mark and ¢f•uno, / The ZBA met last night, and I just wanted to send over a few updates regarding applications that may be pending reviews by you, 1) 15-2-15.1 (there is an application with the ZBA that the owner has placed on hold for a separate dwelling, and there is a rumor that the applicant may now be going for a set off? If you have any news on this, please let us know for our pending, Incomplete file record, and then we can also furnish you wish copies, if your dept. needs them. 2) S. Malon, 97-5-4.5 -Main Road, Cutchogue. The ZBA reopened the hearing and scheduled it for Th, Feb. 26th. Additional comments will be requested on the site plan. 3) Orient Fire Dept. Tower - is expected to be held on Feb 26th, only if the application is complete by about 1/21. If It's not complete by the attorney by the deadline, it may get moved to March 18th. Have a good day, Thanks, 1/9/04 Linda K. Thank you in advance. Cc: file, vl Enc.: Copy of correspondence. ~ • 5~~r . ~s STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAU PPAUGE, N.Y. 1 1 788-55 1 8 SII BIMAL CHAK RA BORTI, P.E. JOSEPH H. BOAROMAN REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER December 31, 2003 Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Your December 16. 2003 Submission Malon Multi Use Buildine Site Plans Dated 4/28/03 Route 25. Cutchoeue SCTM 100-97-5-4.5 Our Case No. 03-336P Dear Mr. Semon: This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. You should be aware that we have also received four (4) sets of revised site plans, dated 12/11/03, from the applicant's attorney, Ms. Patricia C. Moore. We will review the most current set of plans and we will respond directly to Ms. Moore, with a copy of our comments to you upon completion of our review. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or I495, whichever is farther south, north to Long Island Sound. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject case number. The plans must also include the County tax map number. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mazk Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. ~ ~ 2 O nn 2 Very truly yours, D 15 V 6 D ~ ~ ~ JAN - 5 2004 SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Southold Town Traffic Engineering and Safety Plannin Boare Mr. Bruno Semon December 31, 2003 Page 2 cc: Wendy Brodsky, Administrative Assistant, Long Island North Shore Heritage Area Planning Commission SAS:MW STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAU PPAUGE, N.Y. 1 1 788-55 1 8 SU BIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER December 29, 2003 Ms. Patricia C. Moore, Esq. Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Your December 18. 2003 Submission Commercial Project for Stanley Malon Site Plans Dated 12/11/03. Last Revision 12/8/03 Route 25. Cutchoeue SCTM 100-97-5-4.5 Our Case No. 03-336P Dear Ms. Moore: This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or I495, whichever is farther south, north to Long Island Sound. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject case number. The plans must also include the County tax map number. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regazding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. D 2 (r~ (r; O Illl f2 Very truly yours, LS ly LS U LS D Original Signed Gy JAN - 5 2004 SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Southold Town Civil Engineer III Plannin Boar Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Wendy Brodsky, Administrative Assistant, Long Island North Shore Heritage Area Planning Commission Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director/Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer,E Planning Boazd Office, Town of Southold Ms. Patricia C. Moore December 29, 2003 Page 2 Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW t ~ . ~ 5~~r 015 APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS L n For Oj%iee Use Oelt~ r~ Fee: $ VO" J Piled Bv: ~•rn(Y1~~ _ Dnte Assigned/:\ssignment No. ~r;?~ Off ice Notes: `~t s+~e~ ` ~ ~ Parcel Location: House No. 8`+oStreet Main Road Hamlet CutchoG~~' 1 97 5 4.5 3 821 B qA"°F SCTNI 1000 Section Block_Lot(s) Lot Sizes ~ Zone District q~s _ I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMI]sIATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: May 20 2003 Stanley Malon ~ `v' ~ ~ V Applicant/Owner(s): D Mailing 264 Linton Avenue, Lindenhurst, NY 11757 DEC - 2 l Address: 957-5385 Telephone: Southold Town Plannin BoarA NOTE: If applicant is not the owner, state if applicant is owner's attorney, agent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. Patricia C. Moore ~ Authorized Representative: Address: 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 Telephone: 765-4330.- fax: 765-4643 Please specify who you :wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above listed names: ? ApplicanUOwner(s) C~Authorized Representative ? Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED May 19, 2003 FOR: C~Building Permit ? Certificate of Occupancy ?Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ? Change of Use ? Permit for As-Built Construction Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article R Section 100- 103 Subsection C Section 100-102 bulk schedule Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: ~A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ? A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. $7 Interpretation of the Town Code, Article 100-102 Section aunlication of bulkschedult ? Reversal or Other A prior appeal 0 has~7 has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. -Year . Appeol Application, Continued Part A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (attach extra sheet as neerler!): (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted, because: - See attached sheet (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: see attached sheet (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: see attached sheet (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: see attached sheet (5) Has the variance been self-created? ( )Yes, or (X) No. If not, is the construction existing, as built? ( )Yes, or (x) No. (6) Additional information about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirements: (Please attach separate sheet.) see attached building This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at-[he same time preserves and protects the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. ( )Check this box and complete PART B, Questions 8, 9, and 10 below if USE VARIANCE STANDARDS apply. (Please consult your attorney.) Otherwise, please proceed to the signature and notary area below. Part B: REASONS FOR USE VARIANCE (if requested): For Each and Every Permitted Use under the Zoning Regulations for the Particular District Where the Project is Located (please consult your attorney before completing): (7) The applicant CANNOT realize a REASONABLE RETURN because: (describe on a separate sheet). (8) The HARDSHIP relates to the property and does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood because: (describe on a separate sheet). (9) The relief requested will not alter the essential CHARACTER of the neighborhood because: (describe on a separate sheet). i... ~:.Thespirit of the. zoning-urdiaan¢e will be observed. Th)hf€~~~(~A~~Ifare wil#be secured and substantial justice done. Notary Pubtic, State of New York ~ Q /~L /f No. 4882427 ±(~Q~j/ Qualified in Nassau County ; i Commission Expires May 11, add ~ Signature of Il nt or Authorized Agent '--3'wOriTfif'1SC18Fe tnethis-------- . - (Agent must sum Authorization from Owner) ,?~~ay of ...!~!7~~......, 200, oj/ ~ ~ _ Stanley Malon ASS .x~za (Notary Public). zsA app oe~o2 Reason for Appeal Continued Zoning Board of Appeals re: Stanley Malon Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3 the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals is to analyze and assess the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the health, safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or community. In performing this balancing test, the Zoning Board is charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors enumerated in Town Law Section 267b-3(b) The variance should be granted for the following reasons: 1. No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance is granted. The design of the building has been careful to follow the design of development of the adjacent commercial complex and Gary Olsen's office. The intention was to make each wing of the building be less than the 60' width, however, the mezzanine which makes the building conform to the character of the district attaches the wings and the 60' rule is violated. With regard the application of the bulk schedule to this// project, the building department has misapplied the code. Throughout the code, for example in RO zoning, the code states at 100-71 B "provided that not more than one use shall be allowed for each 40,000 square feet of lot area". This limiting language on the number of uses per acreage of land is not in Business zoning or Hamlet Business (applicable by reference). Moreover, in reading the preamble of both the HB and B zoning use districts the commercial uses are intended to enhance the retail development and provide focus for the hamlet area. The proposed development is in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, will enhance the adjacent commercial development. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant can not be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The layout of the buildings has been very carefully designed and redesigned with the Planning Board. The design matches the adjacent development. A courtyard has been designed as the access to the units within the building. The Mezzanine is the owner's office and is a cover for the courtyard. The design can not be achieved without an area variance. 3. The area variance is not substantial The application of the balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance. The building will conform to the design standards of this area of Cuthogue. The buildings which have been constructed in Cutchogue in the last 15 years conform to the style which has been proposed. The building is designed to accommodate easy vehicular access. The uses will complement other commercial uses within close proximity to he property. 4. The varianoe will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The building and the tenants will not adversely impact the environment. All the uses are permitted and will provide services to the surrounding community. 5. The alleged difficulty was not self-created. The buildings have been designed to resemble the adjacent development, the mezzanine provides architectural continuity and function. 6. The variance requested is the minimum variance practicable given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant. he owner's office is in the mezzanine, if we eliminate the mezzanine the buildings will look out of place and not function in overall design. We respectfully request that the appeal be granted, together with any further relief that is deemed necessary and reasonable. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Please include with Z.B.A. Application) Stanley Malon Applicant(s): I. If buildine is existine and alterations/additions/renovations are proposed A. Please give the dimensions and overall square footage of extensions bevond existing building; Dimensions/size: existing house to be demolished Square footage: B. Please give the dimensions and square footage of new proposed foundation areas which do not extend bevond the existing building Dimensions/size: Square footage: II. If land is vacant: Please give dimen ' ps any{ erall s uare fo [a a of new construction: Dimension/size: x I(p~ conn~cted gygimezzanine Square footage: Height: III. Purpose and use of new construction requested in this application: o m ia1 d v 12pment r' i N. Additional informt¢ion about the surrounding contours or nearby buildings that relate [o the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): see attached standards of area variance design of development similar to adjacent 13roperties V. Please submit seven (7) photos/sets after staking corners of the proposed new construction. 7/02 Please note: Further changes, after submitting the above information, must be placed in writing and may require a new Notice of Disapproval to show changes to the initial plans. If additional time is needed, please contact our office, or please check with Building Department (765-1802) or Appeals Department (765-1809) if you are not sure. Thank you. - sep iu ua u2:0ap Moore Law Office- sa17s5as43 p.~ 09/10/2003 09:54 63176`9064 ZC1JItvGGPPEAL560ARD rA;t tlz J\ QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A. APPLICATION A. is the subjeq premiaev listed on the mat estate aserket for sale" 0 Yes l~No II. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? 0 Yes C. I) Are tharo any areas that conain wetland grasses? /VG 2) Aro the wethud area shown on the map submitted with thic applieation7 G 3) Is the property bupc headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? L' 4) if your property contains wetlands or pond areas, have you contacted the office of the Town Trustea+ for its deterrrrinatioa< ofjurisdiction? N~ D. is tbere a depression or sloping elevation sear the area of proposed consnuction at or bekm• five feet above meat acs keel? A,'ri (If not app)iwblc, state "n/a".) E. Are there any patios, wacreta barriers, bulkheads or fences that exist and are not a)awo on the survey reap Drat you are subnuttirrg? N,iY+L pE Haas exist, please state "none".) F. Do you have any constroctim taking place at tltis time coaoemiing your premises? Nit if yes. Please submit a copy of your building pettnit sod map as approved by the Building Department. if roe, pka+e smte. G. Do yrar or any w-owner also own other laral close to this petal? 1?J ]f yes, Plesse explain where or submit extpiee of deeds. ~c~7ic ~1 ;cu - H. Please List present use or operations catductad at this petal SE+2G- f/(1 use C t ~?/~kr", r~; r enc. elld IlrepO50d nnE L~l'77%/1'LGi.t'Gr.' i' C.Z%~: LGZr . --y Authorized Signature sad Date TEST HOLE DAT DONE BY MCDONALD GEOSCIENCE DONE 10/24/01 N/F GLOVER 110 - DARK BROWN _ 7' SANDY LOAM OL 51'0 '4 " CON0. 154.16 BROWN LOAMY MON. 3' SANG SM • PALE BROWN TO _ A COARSE SAND SW ~~a x 12.0 8.5' N N WATER IN PALE o x W BROWN FINE TO (1i COARSE SAND IV W j ~ 15' SW cN 41S rn W N 15.0 O FENCE LINK O ~ x • ~ 'o N A~ 'u' O 'o cn W m o LOT 3 0 ~ ° N/F KAELIN ~ N ~ to 'O p 'O ~ •O ~O GUARANTEES INDICATED HERE ON SHALL RUN CNLY 7O IHE PERSON FCR WHOM THE SURVEY lS PREPARED, AND 4W H/S BEHAIF TO THE CHAIN LINK RTLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, F~ LENDING /NSRTU nON, lF LISTED HEREON, AND ID IHE ASSIGNEES OF IHE LENDING /N5171UnON. PALE *C ADD/RCNAL /NSn/UTIgVS OR SUBSEWENT ONNERS. ~ UNAU7NG4P/ZED AL7ERA770N OR A00/77QV TO iNIS CDN ' SURVEY /S A NOLAnON OF BECKON 7109 DF M ~ 1.3' INE NEW YORM STA 7F EOUCARON LAW. CN ~ ~ ` j COPIES OF 7H/5 SURVEY MAP NOT BEAR/NG N INE LAND SURVEYORS EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL (O O NOT BE CLWSIDERED TO BE A VALID iRUE N 720 CENLT.AR Gl COPY. ~ 1~~ 18.6 m CONC. ~ Ui 1/y" A 19.1 N o N/F KAELIN .i 2-STORY ru ` TEST HOLE RESIDENCE ~ O1• m 49.1' WOOD FRAME > STRUCTURE COVERED STEPS 12.5' ~ ~ ~ O F~1 CONC. w~~~q ~ ~ a ~ p CONC. `+J MON. V^'L~' ,4'SIGN ~ O MON. • S 46' 10 10 W 150.00 TIE = 83.35' MAIN STATE ROAD (NYS 25) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ELEVATION SOURCE: H-326 RESET 1968 FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION OF BUILDING IS 13.51 Southold Torre FEET 1929 NGVD. flannin Board TM# 1000-097-05-04.5 SURVEY OF SURVEYED: 7 NOVEMBER 2001 LOT 4 MINOR SUBDIVISION MADE FOR JOHN J. MIESNER, JR. SCALE 1'= ao' SITUATE AREA = 53,821.43 S. F. CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD oR SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 1.236 ACRES SURVEYED FOR: STANLEY MALON SURVEYED BY STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR. P.O. BOX 294 NEW UFFOLK. N.Y. 119 631- 34-5835 GUARANTEED T0: STANLEY MALON ICENS~ ,ND SU YOR NYS Li No. 4927 01C1084 ~ • si,~~ PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 December 18, 2003 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Ruth Oliva, Chairwoman Southold Town Hall D 53095 Main Road D Southold, NY 11971 DEC 1 8 2003 Southold Planning Board Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Towa Southold Town Hall Plannin Boar 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Stanley Malon 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Board members: Enclosed revised and updated site plans dated 12-11-03 for above project. The restaurant has been reduced in size and seating, the engineering has been revised in response to neighbor's comments and knowledge on historic drainage problems that begin offpremisesbut affect this and the adjacent parcels. Please forward this site plan to the Town Engineer for his comment and the NYSDOT. If you need anything else please do not hesitate to contact me. Very. tnxl~yours, r" ~I Patricia C. Moore cc: Mike Verity, Building Department PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS gOFFO(,~c • BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JA. ~G_ P.O. Box 1179 Chairman ~ J~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO y, ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS O Fax (631) 765-3136 MART N HESIDORDS y~~ ~ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE December 16, 2003 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NYS department of Transportation, Region 10 NYS Office Building 250 Veterans Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788-5518 Attention: Mr. Mark Wolfgang, Civil Engineer I Design /Review Units Dear Mr. Wolfgang: Pursuant to the Southold Town site plan application code; the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the proposed site plan the NYS DOT for directives, comments and or requirements: Site Plan of: Malon, Stanley Multi Use Building The site plan build out is as follows: This site plan is for a new 18,098 sq. ft. commercial center on 1.2356 acres parcel in the B Zone the property is located approximately 83.35' west of Cox's Lane on the north side the NYS Route 25 (Main Road) in Cutchogue. SCTM#(s) 1000-97.-5-4.5 Hamlet/Locality: Cutchogue Zoning: B S.C. Tax Map No.: 1000 - 97 -5-4.5 Major Sub. Minor Sub. Site Plan_X_Cluster Lot Line Change MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Preliminary Site Plan(4 copies)_X_ Road Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) _ Comments: Pending approvals are all jurisdiction agencies and the Southold Town ZBA for a variance. We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (X) Yes ( ) No Referral received NYS DOT Sin ly, t Br em Senior Site Plan Reviewer Enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS `OgUFfU(~CO BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. P.O. Box 1179 Chairman o ~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 y Southold, New York 11971-0969 RICHARD CAGGIANO y, • ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS O Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN HESIDARDS y~ol ~ ~a0`' PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: December 16, 2003 To: Mrs. Oliver, Chairwoman of Zoning Board of Appeals From: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman of Southold Town Planning Board:- Re: Appeal for Malon Multi Use Building proposed construction Main Road, Cutchogue, N.Y. SCTM: 1000-97.-5-4.5 In reference to the appeal application in front of your department. The Planning Board ~~PB) currently has a Site Plan application dated September 30, 2003 and would like:"to offer the following comments and concerns. 1. As of December 16, 2003 the PB referred the proposed site plan application to NYS DOT for directives, comments and or requirements. We will forward the reply to your department when it is received. Please keep us up to date on the project. Thanking you in advance. Cc: file, pb, ZBA Page 1 of 1 Semon, Bruno To: Kowalski, Linda Subject: RE: Malon #5383, Property Inquiry Hi Linda, We currently have an application for a site plan pending relief from the Z.B.A. for the proposed build out. I will talk to the Planning Board about the comments on this email at a work session. At this time please refer to the memorandum with comments from Bennett Orlowski dated 9/24103 sent to Lydia. If any thing else changes we will send them to you. Thanks Bruno -----Original Message----- From: Kowalski, Linda Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:17 AM To: Semon, Bruno Cc: Ruth Oliva (E-mail) Subject: Malon #5383, Property Inquiry Hi Bruno, Good Morning. Just another follow-upwith the Town departments regarding the above application at Main Road, Cutchogue, next to Gary Olsen's property. There were concerns before the ZBA regarding poor visibility at the streets, unsafe exiting on the Main Road in this area, especially during the spring-fall seasons, Harbor Road intersection across the street, also poor drainage at the rear of the property. Just wanted to see if Pat Moore, attorney for Stanley Malon, filed an application for site plan and for landscaping proposals to see how water will be directed, and to start the Lead Agency process within the Town for coordination to involved agencies. Thank you, Linda 12/15/2003 18 • The Suftolk Times ~ ptember,25, 2003 • -k lz m x ~o Wised New b co e h' l~ p Restaurant eyed as anchor of _ . _ - Cutchogue plan CUTCHOGUE-A new commer- _ i - cial complex, -which would be _ ~ ~ - - ~ - - _ _ anchored by an Italian restaurant, will _ open on the eastern end of town if the - _ _ - - town's Zoning Board of Appeals says _ YeS 3 ~ ~ The boaid is scheduled to hold a public hearing today (Sept. 25) on ` ~ i . ~ i ; ~ ~ ; • Stanley Malon's request for variances - to construct the complex on the north ~ side of Main Road, west of Cox Lane. The town building department reject- ed Mr. Malon's project, finding that - ~ - - ~ ~ - - - - ~ the building violates the town's 60- foot width limit and would provide too many uses for the 1.2-acre site. The only structure now standing on Front elavatbn of the commercial bulldlttg proposed by Stanley Malon for Maln Road, Cutchogue. the property, which is zoned for busi- Hess, is a small house in a state of dis- repair. Mr. Malon's attorney, Pat Moore of Southold, argues- that the center would be similar in appearance to the adjoining property, which is home to a number of businesses, including Making Waves hair salon. The design calls for two buildings, each 38~feet wide, connected by a second-story structure that would serve as the administration office. Mr- Malon could construct two buildings; "the only problem is it would not be too attractive," said Ms. Moore. On the multiple use question, the attorney said she's asking for the same flexibility that the owners of the neighboring .property enjoy. That complex includes retail space plus ~ personal service6 and professional offices, she said. 1 Mr: Malon's design shows six units ~ in addition to the :restaurant, which would be operated'by family mem- bers, said Ms. Moore. The ZBA hearing is scheduled to begin at 1:20 p.m. Tlm Kelly l l THE SUFFOLK TIMES. We've got you covered , 9 I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~OSUFF~(~C~ • P.O. Box 1179 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman o Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO ~ ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~ • ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN HEIDOROS y~~l ~ ~a~~ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE MEMORANDUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: September 24, 2003 To: Mrs. Tortora, Chairwoman of Zoning Board of Appeals From: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman of Southold Town Planning Board t' Y,Y~ Re: Appeal for Malon Multi Use Building proposed construction Main Road, Cutchogue, N.Y. SCTM: 1000-97.-5-4.5 In reference to the memo request for comments dated September 16, 2003. The Planning Board (PB) currently has a Site Plan application dated September 30, 2003 and would like to offer the following comments and concerns. 1. The PB is currently reviewing a site plan dated 4/28/03, prepared by Harold E. Gebhard. We do not have the same site plan version date that your office is processing. 2. The proposed build out of the site will need to meet the requirements of the Town Code and NYS Code. As proposed the Multi Use building has many uses fora 53,821 square foot parcel. The parking does not meet the Town Code requirements for the uses as proposed. The length of the proposed building greatly exceeds what is allowable by Town zoning code and removes what would be additional parking by design. 3. The Town Engineer reviewed the site plan and enclosed you will find a copy of the comments. 4. Attached is copy of a letter from Planning Board Staff dated 9/8/03 indicating other requirements needed before we can process this application. 5. The final approval from our department will be based on SCHD approval, NYS DOT, Town ZBA relief, Building Departments Certification, ARC, and all other authorities having jurisdiction. Please keep us up to date on the project. Thanking you in advance. Cc: file, pb, ZBA, MV (BD) PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 1197]-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 September 19, 2003 HAND DELIVERED Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Stanley Malon Premises: 32845 Main Road, Cutchogue, NY SCTM: 1000-097.00-05.00-004.005 Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed please find 7 original site plans for the above referenced matter. Simultaneously herewith I am delivering one to the Building Department and one to the Planning Board. I will leave it up to the Building Department whether or not an amended Notice of Disapproval is required given that there have been no substantive changes to the plans. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PCM/mm cc: Southold Building Departme~twi c~~c-% Southold Planning Board ? u,~ N,ui p ~c~[~od~ ,F~ D S ~ P 2 2003 Southold Town Pla~~~ning Boartl APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS o~OgUFFO~,~c ~ I ,y. GGy Southold Town Hall Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman o= ~ 53095 Main Road Gerard P. Goehringer h Z P.O. Box 1179 George Horning O ~ .ie Southold, New York 11971-0959 Ruth D. Oliva 'y?J O~ ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Vincent Orlando ~ ~O Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown. northfork. net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN MEMO TO: Planning Board FROM: Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Appeals ~r~ DATE: September 1ti, 2003 ..~ICC~~ SUBJECT: Malon Proposed Multi-Use Building (97-5-4.5) This memo is sent as a request for comments regarding the above reviews pending with Town Departments. Presently, The Board of Appeals is reviewing an Appeal of the Building Department's May 20, 2003 Notice of Disapproval for variance relief (copy attached), advertised for a September 25, 2003 public hearing. The plans submitted for review by the ZBA are dated 6-2-03, prepared by Harold E. Gebhard, Architect. The Planning Board may be involved regarding apre-submission review under the site plan regulations of the Zoning Code and your comments regarding this pending application are requested. By way of a copy of this letter the applicant's attorney is requested to submit the same plans to the Building Department for a review of the amendments (dated after the Building Department's review of the 4-28-03 plans) and current site plan data to your Department if it hasn't already been submitted in a presubmission review Additional information may reviewed under our File#5383. Thank you. Encls. cc: Patricia C. Moore, Esq. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~n 2 Fax 765-4643 D V LS D SEP 1 6 2003 Southold Town Planning Board 1 FORM N0.3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: May 20, 2003 TO: Patricia Moore A/C Malon 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 MAY 2 2 ?003 Please take notice that your application, dated May 20, 2003 ZONING BOARD OF For permit to construct amulti-use buildin¢ at ApAEA1S Location of property: 432845 Main Road, Cutcho ug e, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 97 Block 5 Lot 4_5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this 53.821 sauare foot parcel in the B District, is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-102, which states, "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parkine and Loading Schedules incomorated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule requires a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet per use. Although permitted uses, there are up to eiszht different proposed uses on this property. In addition, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-103, C, which states "A proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (11 street." The m notes 89 s ua ~ e~inear foota e. ut riz Si ture Note to A cant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additiona eview from the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. ~ ~ OI~ t APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS LL AA Fnr Ojf+ce Use Onl~~ yam. Fee: $ VO~' File<! Bl~: -Y.rn~- Dnte Assigned/:1ssignment No. Office (Dotes: :P~., ~ 4 84- Main Road ~ Parcel Location: }Iouse No. oStreef Hamlet Cutchonq's q~~ SCTNIl000Section97 Blocko Lot(s)4•~ LotSizeo3,821 ZoneDistrictB ~q<s I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: May 20, 2003 Applicant/Owner(s): Stanley Malon Mailing 264 Linton Avenue, Lindenhurst, b1Y 11757 Address: 957-5385 Telephone: NOTE: If applicant is not the owner, state if applicant is owner's attorney, agent, architect, buildeq contract vendee, etc. Authorized Representative: Patricia Ii• Moore Address: 51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971 Telephone: 765-4330 fax: 765-4643 Please specify who you wish cot-respondence to be mailed to, from the above listed names: 0 Applicant/Owner(s) [#tAuthorized Representative ? Other: WHEREBY TAE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED May 19 , 2003 FOR: L~Building Permit ~ Certificate of Occupancy ?Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ? Change of Use ? Permit for As-guilt Construction Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article % Section 100- 103 SubsectionC Section I00-102 bulk schedule Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: ~ A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ? A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ~J Interpretation of the Town Code, Article 100-102 Section application of bulkschedul ? Reversal or Other A prior appeal ~ has~l has nut been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. -Year . • Appeal Application, Continued Part A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (attach extra sheet as needed): (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if granted, because: See attached sheet (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: see attached sheet (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: see attached sheet (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: see attached sheet (5) Has the variance been self-created? ( )Yes, or (x) No. If not, is the construction existing, as built? ( )Yes, or (x) No. (6) Additional information about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirements: (Please attach separate sheet.) see attached building This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserves and protects the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. ( )Check this box and complete PART B, Questions 8, 9, and 10 below if USE VARIANCE STANDARDS app1V• (Please consult your attorney.) Otherwise, please proceed to the sienature and notary area below Part B: REASONS FOR USE VARIANCE (if renuesterl): For Each and Every Permitted Use under the Zoning Regulations for the Particular District Where the Project is Located (please consult your attorney before completing): (7) The applicant CANNOT realize a REASONABLE RETURN because: (describe on a separate sheet). (8) The HARDSHIP relates to fhe property and does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood because: (describe on a separate sheet). (9) The relief requested will not alter the essential CHARACTER of the neighborhood because: (describe on a separate sheet). .,Thespirit of.thexoning-ordinance will be observed, • Th~)~€~~f~~yA~~lfare wil~ibe secured and substantial justice clone. Notary PudUc, State of New York Ir ~q~~~~ ~ /~L~ /f No. 4801427 ~J !~',Q~jI ' Qua7iiied in Nassau County ~ ~ Commission Expires 4~lay 11, f Signature of II• of or Authorized Agent '-"S'ivora'rif"U'CYSYe meihis (Agent must sum Authorization from Owner) .,~Isday of .....t9.1`...~...,~~ - Q ~%w Stanley Malon (Notary Public) o~z~- zen npp oe~oz _ - ~ Reason for Appeal Continued Zoning Board of Appeals re: Stanley Malon Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3 the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals is to analyze and assess the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the health, safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or community. In performing this balancing test, the Zoning Board is charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors enumerated in Town Law Section 267b-3(b) The variance should be granted for the following reasons: 1. No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance is granted. The design of the building has been careful to follow the design of development of the adjacent commercial complex and Gary Olsen's office. The intention was to make each wing of the building be -less than the 60' width, however, the mezzanine which makes the building conform to the character of the district attaches the wings and the 60' rule is violated. With regard the application of the bulk schedule to this project, the building department has misapplied the code. Throughout the code, for example in RO zoning, the code states at 100-71 B "provided that not more than one use shall be allowed for each 40,000 square feet of lot area". This limiting language on the number of uses per acreage of land is not in Business zoning or Hamlet Business (applicable by reference). Moreover, in reading the preamble of both the HB and B zoning use districts the commercial uses are intended to enhance the retail development and provide focus for the hamlet area. The proposed development is in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, will enhance the adjacent commercial development. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant can not be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The layout of the buildings has been very carefully designed and redesigned with the Planning Board. The design matches • ~ the adjacent development. A courtyard has been designed as the access to the units within the building. The Mezzanine is the owner's office and is a cover for the courtyard. The design can not be achieved without an area variance. 3. The area variance is not substantial The application of the balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance. The building will conform to the design standards of this area of Cuthogue. The buildings which have been constructed in Cutchogue in the last 15 years conform to the style which has been proposed. The building is designed to accommodate easy vehicular access. The uses will complement other commercial uses within close proximity to he property. 4. The variance will have no adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The building and the tenants will not adversely impact the environment. All the uses are permitted and will provide services to the surrounding community. 5. The alleged difficulty was not self-created. The buildings have been designed to resemble the adjacent development, the mezzanine provides architectural continuity and function. 6. The variance requested is the minimum variance practicable given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant. he owner's office is in the mezzanine, if we eliminate the mezzanine the buildings will look out of place and not function in overall design. We respectfully request that the appeal be granted, together with any further relief that is deemed necessary and reasonable. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Please include with Z.B.A. Application) Stanley Malon Applicant(s): I. If building is existing and alterations/additions/renovations are proposed: A. Please give the dimensions and overall square footage of extensions beyond existin building Dimensions/size: existinft house to be demolished Square footage: B. Please give the dimensions and square footage of new proposed foundation areas which do not extend beyond the existing buildinv_: Dimensions/size: Square footage: II. If land is vacant: Please give dimen ' ~s an erall s uare fo to e of new construction: Dimension size: x ~8~ conn~cted ~yginezzanine Square footage: Height: III. Purpose and use of new construction requested in this application: Commercial development IV. Additional information about the surrounding contours or nearby buildings that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): see attached standards of area variance design of development similar to adjacent properties V. Please submit seven (7) photos/sets after staking comers of the proposed new construction. 7/02 Please note: Further changes, after submitting the above information, must be placec! in writing and may require a new Notice ojDi~approva! to show changes to the initial plans. If additional time is needed, p[eare contact our office, nr please check with Building Department (7h5-/802) or Appeals Department (765-1809) if you are not sure. Thank you. TEST HOLE DAT DONE ~ MCDONALD GEOSCIENCE DONE 10/24/01 N/F GLOVER 11 p - DARK BROWN 1' SANDY LOAM OL 51'0 '4 conk, 154.16' BROWN LOAMY MON. 3' SAND SM PALE BROWN 70 • COARSE SAND S1Y 120 i 8.5' N WATER IN PALE ~ 0 x W BROWN FINE 70 (n COARSE SANG IV f~l ~ ,AO .4M O 15" SW W N OI - W 15.0 FENCE LINK O ~ x i N ~ ~P ~ ~ 'o UT W o LOT 3 0 :p ° N/F KAELIN ~ N to 'p ? ° ~ O GUARANTEES INOICA/ED HERE ON SNALL RUN ONLY TO THE PERSON FOR NHOM THE SURVEY lS PREPARED, ANO QV Hf5 BENALF TO THE CHAIN LINK DRE COMPANY, COV£RNMENTAL AGENCY, Fr TENDING /NSBNRON, lF LIS/FD HEREON, AND i0 THE ASSIGNEES Q° TH£ LEND/NC /NSRN170N. GUARANTFfS ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO / A00/DONAL INSRNRONS OR SUBSfOUENi ONNERS UNAU MORIZED AL TFRA DON OR ADDITION TO IH/5 I'pN SURVEY IS A NOLAPON OF SECDON 7109 LK' M ~ 1.3' THE NEW YORR STA IF FDUCA NON LAW. ~ COPIES OF INlS SURVEY MAP NOi 8EAR1N0 IV ~ N THE LAND SURVEYORS EMBOSSED SEAL SHALL LD ~ CELIAR 4' O NOT Bf CON90ERE0 TO BE A ?ALlO /RUE N 10 ENT. V: COPY. ~ 18.6 ~ ~ CONC. 1a.1 ~ o N/F KAELIN A, 2-STORY ~'T TEST HOLE RESIDENCE 49.1' WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE COVERED STEPS _ 12.5' ~ P ~ O O CONC, u~~~q ~ ~ A ~ p CONC. MON. V~,4' SIGN 7 O MON. S 46' 10 10 W 150.00 1~} TIE = 83.35 MAIN STATE ROAD (NYS 25) SEP ~ a 2003 ELEVATION SOURCE: H-326 RESET 1968 FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION OF BUILDING IS 13.51 FEET 1929 NGVD. TM 1000-097-05-04.5 SURVEY OF # LOT 4 SURVEYED: 7 NOVEMBER 2001 MINOR SUBDIVISION MADE FOR SCALE 1'= 40' JOHN J. MIESNER, JR. SITUATE AREA = 53,821.43 S. F. CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OR SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. '.236 ACRES SURVEYED FOR: STANLEY MALON SURVEYED BY STANLEY J. ISAKSEN, JR. P.O. BOX 294 NEW SUFFOLK. N. Y. 119 63 1734-5835 GUARANTEED T0: STANLEY MALON LICENS~~ Y D S VE OR ~ NYS Lic. No. 492 3 01C1084 PLANNING BOARD MEMBE- ~~gOFFO(,~c0 • P.O. Box 1179 BENNETT ORLOWSKi, JR. ~ Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 o Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO W fx Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~ ~ ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MART N HESIDORDS y~~l ~ ~a~~ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 8, 2003 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Town Engineers letter dated 9/5 X03 for the Malon, Stanley Commercial Center site plan 32845 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Mrs. Moore, This letter is to notify you on items still missing from the site plan application. Attached you will find a copy of the Town Engineers letter, please review the letter. The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed: L Modify the site plan to include the recommendations in the Town Engineer letter. 2. The total square feet of the parking calculations don't agree with the building area square feet. Please correct the error and resubmit the proper parking calculations. Please comply as required with Town Code section 100-190. 3. The site plan needs to have the following: adjoining zoning districts listed, landscape schedule, lighting schedule or details and full compliance with Town Code Section 100-250 as required. 4. We will require a NYS DOT curb cut permit, Suffolk County Health Department before final Planning Board approval and the Town ZBA decision on zoning issues. 5. Please submit the materials required for presentation to the A.R.C. 6. We would like to start the SEQRA review, however the site plan must be revised before it can be started. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfu y yours, B o emon Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file ~gUFFOi,~c JOSHUA Y. HORTON °~y~ JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. SUPERVISOR ~ ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD ~ ~ TOWN OF 5011'I'HOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Faz. (516) - 765 - 1366 y~o! y ~~Q`' Tel. (516) - 765 - 1560 T OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. September 5, 2003 Chairman -Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: MALON Commercial Center SCTM 1000-97-05-4.5 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have reviewed the site plan, Drawing # SP-1 dated 4/28/03, for the above referenced project. The typical sections & details for the Parking Lot construction, as indicated by the plan, meet the minimum requirements of the Town Code. State Curb Cut Permits should be obtained by the developer and submitted to the Planning Board prior to final approvals. Drainage design criteria listed in Town Code requires containment of a two (2") rainfall. Calculations should be revised and Runoff Coefficients "C" should be as follows: Roofs 1.0 Asphalt Pavement 1.0 Brick Pavers 0.6 Landscaped Areas 0.2 Drainage Calculations should be modified accordingly. Additional drywells required by the revised calculations should be added at the property line along the proposed Curb Line immediately adjacent to the Route 25 Entrance to minimize the impact of run-off to the State Road. The proposed locations of six new drywells, (three on each side), at the perimeter of the proposed structure is acceptable. The remaining drywell structures should be consolidated in the parking lot areas at each end of the proposed construction to allow for uniform pavement slopes. This will allow for common low points in the parking lot areas and will prevent a washboard contouring that would be difficult to grade. Clustered drywells should be interconnected utilizing 15" diameter traffic bearing drainage pipe. Contours indicated on the plan are difficult to follow and therefore the final rim elevations of drainage grates will be difficult to determine. Each individual drywell or set of leaching pools should be noted with rim elevations to determine final grade of pavement. Top & bottom Curb Elevations should also be indicated a various intervals throughout the site to insure proper drainage pitch to proposed drywell locations. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. ce ly, pp J mes A. R ~ U CC: Peter Harris D (Superintendent of Highways) SEP - 5 2003 Southold Town Plannin Board PLANNING BOARD MEMEE~ gOFFO(,~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ~Q~~ CD P.O. Box 1179 Chairman ~ ~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 p ~ Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO W ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS O ~ ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MART N HEDDWARRDS y~ol ~ ~~0~ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 6, 2003 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Malon, Stanley Commercial Center 32845 Main Road SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Mrs. Moore: Enclosed please find two-site plan maps dated 5/10/02, seven site plans dated 2/27/03, 1/23/03, 11/11/02, 5/10/02 and five surveys dated November 7, 2001. These are either outdated or duplicates. Very truly youurs, Bruno Semon Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMB~ g~FFO(,r • BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Q~~ COG P.O. Box 1179 Chairman h~ 'y Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 p ~ Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO ~ ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS O ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN HEDDWARD9 y~C~ ~ ~QQt' June 6, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Patricia Moore, Esq. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Malon, Stanley Commercial Center 32845 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Mrs. Moore, This letter corrects a mathematical error on the letter dated May 16, 2003. After review of the revised site plan, it was noticed that the original fee paid of $867.45 is insufficient and we require the amount of $406.00 made payable to "Town of Southold". The following is a revised summary of the fees: 1.23 acres X $300.00/acre = $369.00 18098 sf X $0.05 = $904.45 Total: $1,273.45 Payment Received: 867.45 Amount Due: $406.00 The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed: 1. The total square feet of the parking calculations don't agree with the building area square feet. Please correct the error and resubmit the proper parking calculations. Please comply as required with Town Code section 100-190. 2. The site plan needs to have the following: adjoining zoning districts listed, landscape schedule, lighting schedule or details and full compliance with Town Code Section 100-250 as required. 3. We will require a NYS DOT curb cut permit, Suffolk County Health Department before final Planning Board approval and the Town ZBA decision on zoning issues. 4. Please submit the materials required for presentation to the A.R.C. at the meeting set for June 19, 2003 at 4:30pm. 5. We would like to start the SEQRA review, however the site plan must be revised before it can be started. The revised site plan is tentatively on for a June 16, 2003 Planning Board work session, we will need the revised site plan prior to the work session. If there aze any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Res y yo , Bru em Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law D Main Road ,Up , 5 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Southold Town Tel: (631) 765-4330 Plannin Board Fax: (631)765-4643 June 5, 2003 BY HAND Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Malon, Stanley Commercial Center 32845 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCTM # 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Enclosed please find my client's check in the sum of $406.00 payable to "Town of Southold" for payment of the balance due to you. Please continue to process the site plan application. Thank you. Ver~~ ly yours, ~ ~ Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr Enc. • • Sv,e,~ Bs SOUTHOLD TOWN V L ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE June 3, 2003 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: .Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Herbert Ernest, Southold Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board ,Warren Sembach, Gail Wickham and Gerard Goehringer for the Mattituck Park District; Harold E. Gebhard and Patricia Moore for the Stanley Malon Building; as well as Nancy Steelman and Ural Talgt for Sang Lee Farms. Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of April 3, 2003. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. MATTITUCK PARK DISTRICT (Peconic Bay Boulevard -Mattituck) It was RESOLVED by Robert Keith and seconded by Garrett Strang to TABLE the application . Although conceptually agreeable, the Committee requests revised plans showing the Hardy Plank siding with battens, a gable roof (the same pitch or stepped down) extending over the porch, the missing elevations, the color of the roof shingles, siding and trim as well as the location of the mechanicals and roof penetrations. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. (Main Road - Cutchogue) Presubmission The Committee had no serious objections but noted that revisions may be necessary dependent on the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Comments included a recommendation that the cupola be reduced in scale, the location of mechanicals and roof penetrations be documented and that cuts of wall and y1,W, parkingAb`~"~I~mitted. SANG LEE FARMS (North Road -Peconic) It was RESOLVED by Herbert Ernst and seconded by Robert Keith to APPROVE the application with the CONDITION that revised drawing be provided to show the color of the roof, the finish of the doors, and the location of the mechanicals and roof penetrations. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. The NEXT MEETING i ~ , e 19. del PIo4l~oS £OOZ s - Nnr RobeA.LLartttWJJo . Kf ~tlh " Q Secretary ~UU~~~~ Q YYVKP~,Ca7a71V1Y H~7CIYUH ~THOLD TOWN PLANNING~IARD June 2, 2003 at 4:30 pm SITE PLANS Daffodils 40385 CR 48 Southold, NY 11971 SCTM: 1000-59-9-30.4 Zone: LB Representation: Mr. Delaney RE: 1) Recommend unlisted coordinated SEQRA review with Planning Board as Lead Agency at June 9 Public Meeting. Malor Stanley 32845 Main Road Cutchogue, NY SCTM: 1000-97-5-4.5 Zone: B Representation: Mrs. Moore RE: 1) Recommend unlisted coordina d SEQRA review with Planning Board as Lead Ag at June 9 Public Meeting. ,,+a~ ...a ~ /._l R(yP rOT Peconic Landing (Parking Lot) 1500 Brecknock Road Greenport, NY SCTM: 35-1-25 Zone: HD, R-80 Representation: Mr. Thomas Wolpert RE: 1) Recommend unlisted coordinated SEQRA review with Planning Board as Lead Agency at June 9 Public Meeting. Mattituck Pazk District, 9233 Peconic Bay Boulevard, Mattituck RE: 1) Recommend unlisted coordinated SEQRA review with Planning Boazd as Lead Agency at June 9 Public Meeting. Sang Lee Farms, 25180 CR 48, Peconic Town engineers letter and recommend unlisted uncoordinated SEQRA review with Planning Board as Lead Agency at June 9 Public Meeting . MAJOR AND MINOR SUB_ DIVISIONS. LOT LINE CHANGES SET OFF APPLICATIONS Mr. Cilia 1703 Little Neck Road Cutchogue SCTM: 103-5-2.1 & 2.2 Zone: R-80 Representation: Mr. John Cilia RE: 1) Recommeud uncoordinated SEQRA review with Planning Board as Lead Agency at June 9 Public Meeting and to set the final public hearing for July 14,2003 . bs 6/2/03 ^ ~ • Page 1 of 1 Semon, Bruno From: Verity, Mike Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 3:01 PM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: RE: Malon Commercial Center Anytime!!! -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 2:59 PM To: Verity, Mike Subject: RE: Malon Commercial Center Hi Mike, Thanks for the help. Bruno -----Original Message----- From: Verity, Mike Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 2:55 PM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: RE: Malon Commercial Center -----Original Message----- From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Tuesday, May Z7, 2003 12:53 PM To: Verity, Mike Subject: Malon Commercial Center Hi, Just a reminder that the certification is due. We need to get the approval on the above site plan. Thanks Bruno 5/27/03 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: May 20, 2003 TO: Patricia Moore A/C Malon 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application, dated May 20, 2003 For permit to con/stprfu~ct a multi-use building at 6 'lei ,A O,~. .dbJ ~4 Location of property: 432~ain Road, CutchoQUe, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 97 Block 5 Lot 4_5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this 53,821 square foot parcel in the B District, is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-102, which states, "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." i Bulk schedule requires a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet per use. Although permitted uses, there are up to eight different proposed uses on thisproperty. In addition, the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-103, C, which states, "A proiect shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixt~(601 linear feet of frontage on one (1) street." The buildi es s uare feet of inear foota e. C l Authoriz ~gnatur Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: May 20, 2003 TO: Patricia Moore A/C Malon 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application, dated May 20, 2003 For permit to construct amulti-use buildin;; at Location of property: 432845 Main Road, CutchoQUe, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 97 Block 5 I,ot 4_5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this 53 821 square foot parcel in the B District is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-102, which states, "No building or premises shall be used and no buildin;; or~art thereof shall be erected or altered in the B District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule requires a minimum lot size of 30 000 square feet per use. Although permitted uses, there are up to eight different proposed uses on this property In addition the proposed construction is not permitted pursuant to Article X, Section 100-103, C, which states, "A proiect shall be divided into sepazate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty160) linear feet of frontage on one (1 street." The b m otes 8 uaz feet of lineaz foota e. ~ I~AY 2 8 X03 ut on Signature Southold Toen Plannin Board Note to App icant: A change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additional r om the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~g~FFO~,~c BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Q~' OG P.O. Box 1179 Chairman =hQ 'y~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 o Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO W ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMER9 ~ ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MARTIN HESL1IDORDS oy~O,(~ .1,QQ~ May 16, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Malon, Stanley Commercial Center 32845 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Mrs. Moore, In reviewing the site plan application materials submitted to this office, the Planning Board found the following elements to be deficient. After review of the revised site plan, it was noticed that the original fee paid of $867.45 is insufficient and we require the amount of $638.00 made payable to "Town of Southold". The followi~ s a summary of the fee: ~ 1.23 acres X $300.00/acre = $600.00 ~3G 9 ~ ~ 18098 sf X $0.05 = $904.45 Total: $1,504.45 /2~3.FS Payment Received: 867.45 X06. Amount Due: $637.00 The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed: 1. Complete an EAF long form and attachment D and submit them to us. 2. The total square feet of the parking calculations don't agree with the building area square feet. Please correct the error and resubmit the proper parking calculations. 3. We will require a NYS DOT curb cut permit and Suffolk County Health Department before final Planning Board approval. 4. Please submit the materials required for presentation to the A.R.C. 5. Please refer to attachment for all other site plan required items. if there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Re t y yolu~s, - B no mon Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:fi1e, Site Plan Chedk List J~ f r SITE PLAN PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE CHECK L/ST DATE, APPLICATION: You are required to obtain the following approvals: Suffolk County Department of Health Services: / water supply, waste water disposal permit, (mil .Curb cut for State and County roads. .Southold Town Trustees: dredging, bulkhead, wetlands, coastal hazard area. I ) .New York State Departmental of Environmental Conservation: bulkhead, dredging, tidal wetlands. ( ) .Southold Town Board of Appeals: variance, interpretation, special exception. ( ) . U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: bulkhead, dredging. O . Greenport Village Utility: water if within village franchise area ( ) . NYNEX, Long Island Lighting Company: poles moved, other utility considerations. O .Proof of Health Department Review or Exception: Staff will indicate what type of approval Is required. ( ) Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works. curb cut permit The Planning Board will also: ( ) . Send a letter to the Fire District for a recommendation on the need for a fire well or hydrant. .Send to Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review, (Condominiums only). O .Send to the Town Engineering Inspector for review of drainage and road profiles, O ,Send to the Building Department for certification, ( ) .Send to the Town's ConsulCant's for price quote to review the Lony Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF]. ~ ' ~ ~ i Site Plan Check List [ ] Lot, block, section from tax map Name and address of landowner on record [ ] Names and addresses of adjoining landowners [ ] Name and address of applicant (if not same as landowner) [ ] Name and address of person preparing map (plan) sealed with license seal and signature [ ] Date of plan [ ] North point [ J Location of all rights-of-way within 500 feet of property lines [ ] Key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet [,/f Existing zoning, including zone lines ( ] Scale, 1 inch equals 20 feet Existing contours with intervals of 2 feet or less [ ] Show wetlands Trees of 6 inches in diameter at a point 3 feet above the trunk base [ ] Location of any cultural and historical features within 500 feet of the property boundaries [ ] Existing building structures and utilities [ ] All uses of the site [ ] Paved areas including sidewalks and parking areas Outdoor lighting Outdoor signs -sketch to scale and colors Grading, including existing and proposed topography with 2 feet contours on site and 200 feet beyond the property line [ ] Spot elevations for buildings [ ] Location of landscaping, buffering, street tree plans [ ) Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing proposed use of floor area Show location of ground transformers fire well d fire hydrants [ ] Show location of dumpster [ ] Percent lot coverage [ ] Percent landscaped [t/J~ Data for architectural review (see attached sheet) Review required by Suffolk County Department of Health Services [ ~ Review by New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) for curb cut permit [ ] Review by Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) for curb cut permit [ ] Review by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) [ J Review by Southold Town Trustees (freshwater wetlands). Flag and show wetlands on plan [v)' Review required by Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals [ ] Review required (permit) by South/~jld Town B`o/ard Other.-~~,~, \~1 ,-~a~~ a..~ fir-, ~ ~ • II The following infornration is to be submitted to the Architectural Review Committee afrer the Planning Board notifies you in writing that the application is acceptable. The Planning Board office will attach a copy of a site plan to the following material: • Notations as to the type of building construction, proposed occupancy or use and the location of fire separation walls (if it projects beyond the building envelope). • Floor plans drawn to scale (1/4" = 1' preferred) • Elevation drawings to scale of all sides of each building (1/4" = 1' preferred). The following information shall be shown on the drawings: Type and color of roo&ng -include sample Type and color of siding -include sample Type of windows and doors to be used, material and color of all windows and door frames -include sample Type and color of trim material -include sample • Rendering of building if possible • Notation of the type of heating/cooling equipment to be used. Show or indicate exterior locations of all equipment i. e., heat pumps, air conditioning compressors, etc. on plans and/or elevations. • Type and locations of all roof-mounted mechanical equipment • Type and locations of all mechanical equipment, plumbing and/or attic venting through roof or building sidewall. • Type, color and style of proposed masonry material for chimneys or accent walls - include samples or photos. • Details, color, type and style of any proposed ornamentation, awnings, canopies or tents. • Photos of existing buildings and/or neighboring properties from four directions of project site, if possible. • Type, color and design of all exterior signage, both building-mounted and free standing. Please use this list as a checklist. Regretfully, we cannot accept incomplete submissions. Place all matetials in a large manilla envelope with your application name printed on the outside. Lazge samples should be labeled. If you want samples returned, please note same on the label. THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE WOULD BE HAPPY TO MEET WITH YOU AT APRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE PRIOR TO YOUR ACTUAL SUBMISSION *ATRICIA C. MOORf~ 51020 MAIN gOAD, SOUTHOLD, NY 1 191 [S18) 766-4330 UATF ~ r ~ To c./~G~~ S~H~E_~1 J L t .WY 1S ~T PLANNINE BoRARD M~MB E• o~~gUFFO(,~~o P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Gyj~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 o - Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGIANO ~ ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 WILLIAM J. CREMERS O ~ ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MART N HEDWGARDS ~'~Ol ~ ~~0~ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: May 15, 2003 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Review Re: Site Plan Certification for Malon (Commercia enter) 32845 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Zoned B Status: Active Site Plan proposed for review at the public work session date of May 27, 2003. Required Return Date: May 23, 2003 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Harold E. Gebhard, dated 04/28/03 and received by the Planning Board 05/01/03, 1 Plan set (drawings A-1, A-2 & A-3) prepared by Harold E. Gebhard, dated 04/29/03. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SUffO(,~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ~Q~O C~ P.O. Box 1179 Chairman = Town Hall, b3095 State Route 25 O - Southold, New York 11971-0959 RICHARD CAGGL4N0 W ~ Telephone (631) 765-1935 WILLIAM J. CREMERS O ~ ~ Fax (631) 765-3136 MART N HEDDWARDS y~o~ ~ ~QQ~ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE MEMORANDUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: May 15, 2003 To: James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Rev?sw~J Re: Site Plan Approval for Malon (Commercial Center) 32845 Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCTM# 1000-97-5-4.5 Zoned B Status: Active Site Plan proposed for review at the public work session date of May 27, 2003. Required Return Date: May 23, 2003 In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and approval. Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Harold E. Gebhard, dated 04/28/03 and received by the Planning Board 05/01/03, 1 Plan set (drawings A-1, A-2 & A-3) prepared by Harold E. Gebhard, dated 04/29/03. ~ +i x'31.' +~c s ~ r 4. ~ f`~/ ~ . r 'r,',b ' + a ~ t r.`~.. 1 r'' f • 1~ ~ t ' ~ ~ ~ - • f' ~ _ ? .y, ~ i r ~ j~~ ~ 7 yf Y ~ IC, J i < ? C ~ t -we'd' v 'x. I~ ~ b~. ~r'~? 1` "j~~~.~ - - f rgPn-is. +k R"'~F f v~ r s y - ~ y _ ~ 4 ~ . - r ~ • s ~ -,r ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~s , l ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ' "`a"~,,, ~ RO_ ~s ~,Fw ' ''Vi'a . ~b~ ~ tf • ~ ~ rte` YSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY DATE ~ 05/14/2003 473889 SOUTHOLD ~ SCHOOL MATTITUCK SCHOOL ROLL SEC TAXABLE RCLS 210 1 FAMILY RES TOTAL RES SITE 97•-5-4.5 TOTAL COM SITE 32845 MAIN RD ACCT NO 13 = OWNER 8 MAILING INFO ===1=MISC 1________ ASSESSMENT DATA MALON STANLEY 8 CHRISTINE IRS-SS I **CURRENT~~ RES PERCENT 264 LINTON AVE I 1 (LAND 1,500 **TAXABLE~~ LINDENHURST NY 11757 I BANK ITOTAL 5,000 COUNTY 5,000 **PRIOR** TOWN 5,000 I (LAND 1,500 SCHOOL 5,000 I ITOTAL 5,000 ==DIMENSIONS ===1=====_= SALES INFORMATION ACRES 1.24 IBOOK 10727 SALE DATE 10/01/88 SALE PRICE 160,000 (PAGE 00013 PR OWNER MEISNER JOHN J JR __=====TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 _____________1== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IFD029 IPK090 IWW020 ISW011 F1=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=G0 TO INVENTORY F9=G0 TO XREF F10=G0 TO MENU • ~ ~s/~~ PATRICIA C. MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski MelissaMcGowar~ Secretaries May 1, 2003 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board D ~j ~ ' Town Hall D 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 ' ~ ~ Southold, NY 11971 (BY HAND) Southold iorM Re: Stanley Malon Plannin Boats 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Victor: Enclosed please find 10 sets of proposed plans for development on the subject property. As you recall I met with the Planning Board and we discussed the following: 1. More buffer along Rt.25 (push out pazking towazds the building) 2. Land bank parking in the back along the reaz property line 3. Architectural Elevations redesigned with a more traditional (Brick) building After you have had an opportunity to review the plans, please place this matter before the Planning Board. I wish to be present when the Planning Board discusses the plan so please let me know when it is scheduled for review. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly i~ours, ~ w~ P tricia C. Moore cc: Mr. & Mrs. Malon . ~ 5'Ji3F Y~ v~. PATRICIA C. MOORS ~j Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski MelissaMcGowmi Secretaries March 3, 2003 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall D ~ Ro 53095 Main Road t{o D P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ~ 4 (BY HAND) Re: Stanley Malon 1000-97-5-4.5 Southold Tows %annin Board Dear Victor: Enclosed please find 10 sets of proposed plans for development on the subject property. There is presently a house and shed on the property which will be demolished. Enclosed 10 prints of the survey showing the existing structures. The mature trees can not be preserved without the Planning Board waiving the parking requirements. The property is adjacent to commercial development (strip Shopping center to west and Kaelin's to the east). Please place this matter before the Planning Board. I wish to be present when the Planning Board discusses the plan so please let me know when it is scheduled for review. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truiy~oTurs, . ~ Patricia C. Moore cc: Mr. & Mrs. Malon PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~SUFFO~,~co BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. l/y~ P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Town Hall, 5309b State Route 25 y 2 Southold, New York 11971-09b9 RICHARD CAGGIANO ~0 ~ Telephone (631) 76b-1938 WILLL9M J. CREMERS ~ ~ Fax (631) 765.3136 KENNETH L. EDWARDS y'flpl ~ ~a~~ MARTIN SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 29 August 2002 Patricia C, Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Stanley Malon Main Road, Southold SCTM # 1000-97-5-A.5 Hi Pat: Tn my "Pending" pile I have the Malon file and thought I'd mention out that we aze still awaiting your response to "Parking numbers to be addressed by Pat". I believe this is in reference to the deficiency of 26 parking spaces pointed out at the Tune 10`" work session. Other things to consider for this project: 1) This site is moderately wooded with mature oaks, chemes, pines and, locusts. With the rapid depletion of habitat and natural resources in the Town, perhaps the applicant would consider changing the layout as to preserve the existing vegetation. In relation, please include the trees (as well as the existing structures) on your next set of maps as per the site plan application instructions. 2) As you may know, the nearby intersection is a difficult one that is currently being looked at by the DOT. After informally mentioning this site plan to them, the DOT "recommended" reducing the project to one curb cut. Please, consider incorporating this into your layout. I thank you, L ott W.T. Hughes Senior Environmental Planner PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. 3 gQFFO(~ P.O. Box 1179 Chairman C~ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Dy Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS o ~ Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. N x Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO ~y ~ poi ~ Sao PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 12 June 2002 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y.11971 Re: Stanley Malon Main Road, Southold SCTM # 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Ms. Moore: The Town Planning Deparhnent has received the site plan application for the above referenced project. As you know by your attendance at the work session on June 10~' , the Planning Boazd has begun its review of the project. Currently, we await the changes /additions requested at the work session. I thank you, ott W.T, hes Senior Environmental Planner i • SM PATRICIA G MOORS Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 June 4, 2002 BY HAND Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Stanley Malon Premises: Main Road (Rt. 25), Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCTM # 1000-97-5-4.5 Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Enclosed please find an Application for Consideration of a Site Plan for the above referenced matter together with three (3) prints of the proposed project and my client's check in the sum of $867.45 for the application fee. If you need anything else, please do not hesitate to contact me. V2ry"`truly yours, ~ i Patrici~-S~Moore PCM/mr Encls. ~ ~ ~4 II I JUN a Southold Tovun PEanninq Bcard C F ~iucl ~J Sub~~ttsston Without a Cover Letter Sender: CGP'~z ~n /~onr-t ~'I. .7 CC~Z-~' /7?Ciii~ ?~z^~~ ~;~,cf%Cr/c~ ~Y~ ~liS ~ ~/33~ Subject: M~le~ - l-c~.a~c~ o~ SCTIIf#: 2000- ~/7- OS' - ~ ~ ~aN ~ ~ zooz Date' SoutholdTown planning Boar~t Comments: l ~ ~C/~ ~SER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Tvpe: Approved Project Type: Site Plans Status: Final Approval SCTM # : 1000 - 97.-5-4.5 Proiect Name: Malon. Stanlev jMulti Use Building) Address: 32845 NYS Road 25 Hamlet: Cutchogue Applicant Name: Stanlev Malon Owner Name: Malon, Stanlev Zone 1: B Approval Date: 4/12/2005 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date Indicates that we have received the related Information End SP Date: 4/12/2005 Zone Zone 3: Location: The property is located approximately 83.35' w/o Cox's Lane on the n!s/o NYS Road 25 SC Filing Date: CandR's: Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCANNED MAR 2 9 2007 Records Management SCAN Date: . _ NOTES: I. REPAIR EXISTIN® SFIOULDER, SIDE!4ALK AND 6UPMBIN~ AS Ot:24DE~ED B'r' STATE 2. ~L~AN OUT [XISTIN~ D~INA~E S~UC~RES ALON~ AND I~MEDIAT~L~ ADJACENT TO TH~ ~OU~ 25 Sl~ F~ONTAGE AT THE ~OMPLETION OF GONS~UGTION. D, SITE FALLS BET~EN ~FE~ENOE HARKENS 157D ~ 1574 ON ROUTE 25 4. THE OON~AOTOR 5HALL D~ R~DPONGiDLD ~0~ A~ 5HALL ~PLAO~ ALL 5[GNAL INTeRCONNeCT CABLE, DE~OTOR CABLE, CONPUIT AND ALL UNDERGROUND ACCESSORY ECUIPHENT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 5. PRtO~ TO STARTING ANY ~OR~ AT THIS LOCATION, THE CON.ACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE STA~ DEPARTMENT OF T~NSPORTATION THAT A TONEOUT OF SIGNAL DOUIPHDNT IS NEEDED 6. ALL T~APFIO SI~NAL~ SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A T~FPIO RESPONSI~ OPERATION AN~ ALL INTERCONNECT, ~H~E EXiSTINg, SHALL BE ~AINTAINEO THE CON.ACTOR SHALL PAY A LI~UtOAT~O DAMGES CPIA~E OF $500.00 PE~ OALENOAR DA% CALENOAR ~AY IF AO~ATION AND OOOROlNATION IS NOT HAINTAINEP. COX LANt=: ,...,,, [2[5][ [ t/I/ N.T.D. N.T.B. STATE (I~ NEW YORK DEPARTME;NT (IF TRAhlSI~TATTON Id~TRIC ST,4,NOARD OETECTAIN. E llARN[NG DET~iILS 11608-5P,2 N.¥.D. PAX/IN~ ~Dt~TAIL O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 [ N.T.~,. TYPICAl M.P.'I'. ~tDTAIL,. I~TirC~I~L,E If~N]l~i AT FLUOr .~RFN:ES IJENBEO TRMISITIOHS) I)[TECT~ IAIIHINO &T Ci~ RkNP 'I1 - Il /_.,.....,,. -] 00600008--- oooooooooldl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000000~_J O000]~_0. L~.~OO-'T[i" OOl[ SECTK# ~IN/I~A¥ ~,I=C, TION N.T.D. N.¥.$. CONC. CUt~4D Dt~TAIL TYPE A N.'I'.D. '1 I/ Il f', STANI_E'¢ 'i,',l!i ,,,,' i! f4ALON \ : \ AIL t,q©4 5LF. \ / OC RI \ 0G OG L TAILJ, S ELt=F., I ~IC~A&. LtE¢t~I't~2 ELd6, I ~I6,AL NOTES Sd,AL E I~E~V'I~ION5 PATE ~ Ol"lI'l[ F'CIAi [?, ~ JUt · b,7 ANLE ~ i l/q blAIN ':d ,~ 1 }z FIRST FL 4 ', ,FL PLAN I () < [ LLI -f ,!,!',, ....... "kl Ii, i; LINE OF ROOP ABOVE ,I '1 :f ' 007 h,'IATF'F~ AL.. I E~'~E'NFP ELt~cT,1 t~I¢.,AL LEE~END ELE¢_,, l ~I,GA.L. NO i ~ i~k"'VISlOH5 E~ATE ~-Ei'-IARF. 5 I I¢,Oblh'lErc'';IAI IC'~'.-' JEC, STANi E'f lq/-& C'I,I FqAIN ST/~ r.C k'OA~ ' (firs SEC,(>NE) Pi Ou h~? F>I All Architect; I IL'I,,,IxlA (.~C4dbZ I Avenue job ri,.',: II 1,5 I J [ [ _J =Il I t [ ]" F -I ' [ L L, f '1 * ,'ill!l/F, I/,[ iF, , II, :,l.',llll r II/q, 'N Iqx\lN' [/,1! ~, '[j LOA~IN® S~,HIZZ)UI_E IN PSF ~] XC~ ZXV~'I-IN® NOTF'S: F~LLJi"dBI N® NOTES. LANK FIN. FL TYPICAL. iI iI IL' FIN FI. qC/ALE s" I' ,/" b STANLEY I-IAL, ,N ,, Arc FAX 1226-7,d,58 I I~ .... ~ I ' HEGAFLC?c*AOL .C,')hl I ~~II F~.ONT ~ B'.FAP[:L FVA~ION LLI I :,C t, L E '1, I -, BF~IGK d~lJOIl' ELEVATION ½ STANLE'YNALON Arobit¢o,I PlANA,SoI'iEZ hflAIN 9,] A1 ~ F'.OAP dql'9 i%0 Z,~P,* ~ No~ H, Viell~c,c,d ~venu,:~I I~I 1 2 Il Cl. ItHCGLE, NY Llndcnhta -q, N.r. II 7_pi / l~X ~v:? -I/~ ]ou) r,,? I DI-,D8 FIN FL , ) ILL 7 FIN ~J bio I/'Af-E B'~-i"I*",F't-S ~,Z,F' HloroJ~ ~. Ge~hordI FAX 220 ~,(.;~P~P L ~',Xh, ~~1 [. ], TOI/I:::T II OOM IPBTAIL NS, TA[ LAFI,PH ,c~ lC, I ' ]-- (FOP- OPtENIN®BJ: AIL HUI~.IGANE ~II~AP ~2BTAIL ANC, H~I~ BOLT ~ETAIL Ai'k HOF: BC*[ ~ FO-F'LA~E DTUD TO FC~4DATION C.,ONNEGTION TFU~S/ P~AFTEFt TO DOUB[E PLAIE INC-iFALLATION la~ I?_, PL!.]MBIN~, NO I L~ FII~,E/CHi::Y¢~ DETEOTION DESICN LOAI2S NAILIhE, ,SC2r-~DULE (12.0 M.P.H. I~IIND LOA~2) OAt~"I=N I ~Y NCTT'E~ L h' ROOFIN~ / 51PlN~, IN.SUJ..ATION ~ /r 'fYPI¢..AL 121t,¥1,,~IiiLL r2 III Z ALLuIp4-'xUI [ C,O~ ~ c PE"ACF-'~ I.' ';, -'" ' t-'R'L~[ ~/:,FE' F, LE',', ~-Ik_'F'I~IN,-,, FhlIE!-' l'"[:r,I, -il bO/ I~N/\/'II , A ']= Fill , ,] TE [ N.T.,~,. HEALTH ~14f k'E HHL 14~ I~IF k'E k"IILI P~E i'l(;I i , HIA[ IINAT] l' blA ,lEi F ErlSLl;] ] I, Ill[ I i&ITITAIN t k [:AF~AN, IHt F'B bill I H,I Ti* ~ f'Pi/AIE kq&]~ F' t,itPFill , I1/HNIAIN F , '" t ~INiI, IUbl ,_t Al,II, ,Xl,lf IJNIq , 'P Iii[ ';,AIJITAF ~ ' ir ,iFil L ~'I'C'Ill ~}F iJNll'-, I FL_'!'gF'Ff Ill,IF:, 11~ ': FPI T' I lilE AI'H /], , I F-,, klJlq, [',Z '[ ¢, Pql Itili[ ; [ [ I [I]~ I-'Fh q:EF'q1' L IN~ Iqq[[ , . 4'., 'bll]. q'i I I Ali N.T.~. FEB - 7 2005 LOCATION MAP ['Fi/.ir iA, [ F,iJi,i~ il k I ,b:iINL] I [<Ill[ z I11, , Ir [ . I II ',1' I b. ]dLZ] I , ' iii IlL ] Jr'I, : /',lh-'[I , '[(~''dT.~' '-.I-.,[ 1]. Z[~l-14 L F L P. FOFAI ~F oAF"~E Fl'%l H(',L[ /%. E ONAL[: :DL'i)'c,L I~ iNfORMATION /',lJ[ I .,, IIh I~A~K,I N~, ~.AL~UIATION~ I ;',f-'i It-I,, ,[: ¥I, ~I'] h ', ii ,l k [ IAIL , ,4':' ., I ~' !~1,-I~ L,-}&F,IrlL, ,!} 41L II,J> ,(,i ,A,~h'~, ~f';*l'l' I% ~'Z' \1_;_~ , II I'! , ' ] .', ~, J,'][[ STANLEY' HALON L I~, I 'mhm :t, N 1' Ii ,"L,'/ 4"¢ EH CAST IRON PI~E TO NOTE: HI®I-lEST RECORDED HATER LEVEL El? OLDEN S.C.H.D. ON 5-10-2002 I& &.54 FROM HELL NO. &5-332q T'fPICAL DI~¥1~ELL $ECTION I ,dOOD ER/ 7 !XI&TIN® HONUMENT I'dONUPIE NT SIGN LOCATEC 15LO'' FROM FRONT PROPERY LiNE N/P KAELIN 24"<V CAST IRON ERAHE& d COVERS-HATER4 INSECT TIGHT - ~CALE 14"= I'-O" x 24" HIDE OPENIN® (4' O" LIQUID DEPTH) S" THICK RC BOTTO"'I SLAB ii, OF POOL PIETES 4. 5OUNPS ?l~Ol'q SUP-.VE'f tST STA1NILE'f J. .SAKSEI'q, .JR. L.S. SIGN billiON READ&: "ONE HAY - DO NOT I~.EPUTE D LOCATION CE &ANITAR'¢ S'¢&TENI PUBLIC P~ATE R EXISTING ADJACENT BLDG. (RETAIL) -~5,q~O SQUARE FEET b ~,I.,IpFOLK COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. =FLOE& PIN.EL.EL -SANITAR,f SYSTEIvl [?ESIGIq- -DP-.,f STO~ES- O.O5 G.P.E). IA!ET STORES O.15 G.P.19. -NON-]'dEE) ICAI_ OFFICES-O.O© GROUND HATER I"IANAGEh'IENT ZONE IX/' ALLOJ4ABLE 600 G P D/ACRE 1256A X GOO= 742 G.PD ALLOk,IABLE PROPOSED BLI?G- ©PLOPPING CENTER I,,IO TENANTS AS OI-- THIS TINE DESIGN ASSUMED @. 4,0©0 S.F. E)Rh' STORES I,q4-5 S.F. kiET STORES 2,858 S.F. OFFICE SPACE 585 .'- 15= 5qO LF OF 8'-O"¢ LEACHING POOLS(SqO LF USE 2- 8'-0"¢' x IO' O"N LEACEIIN® POOLS = 20 LF PLUS I- EXPANSION POOL x .O5 - 121.D x 15 - 2q1.8 x .O© 1~1.4 585 ©.P.D. + 25 SF/FT= 15.8 LFj SEPTIC TANK TO BE 2 PAYS FkO~i (585 GAL x 2= I1~O) NEED I1~O GAL SEPTIC TANK LEACHING POOLS: (I) 5' 0" ¢ X 5'-O"H (4' O"L.E).) 5'-0"¢ L.F. = 25 SQ.FT,/FQOT ®OOP FOR ]200 GALLONS HEALTH ~EPT. No. CIO-O2-OOII NOTE= SPRINKLER SYSTEPI NOT RE®UIREP AS PEP. BUII_I?IN® CODE OF THE STATE OF hIE~ SECTION qo5 EXISTING STORY - TO BE AND REi~OVED z<( N.T.$J I~.~.~'. DEVICE DETAIL$ FLOI~ PROM BUILPlN® PITCH ¼" PER FOOT MINIhIUPf BREA&E TRAP 6'-O"¢x5'-O' DP TO BE USED UP TO 2000 GAL PER GONG BOTTOI"f BLAB ¢!JPI~OLt<, COUN'r¥ HEALTH DEPT. NOTE~ D~AINAcE cALCULATION~ TE¢T HOLE I. ALL PRECAST UNITS OF THE SANITARY SYSTEi'" TO BE AS h4ANUFACTUREE) BY 14ELLI"IADE CO., lNG, OR APPR, OVEI~ EGUAL. 2 THERE IdlLL BE NO INDUSTRIAL i/WASTE INTO THIS SYSTEM. 5. TliERE I~ILL DE [,IO CONTAHINATED HASTES RETURNEE) TO THE SOIl_ UNLESS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF HEALTH. 4. I'dAINTAIN OLEARANC, ES AS SHOINN ON PI_AN. 5 ALL PIPIN® USED IN Tbl~ SANITAR'" S'"STEI'd SHALl FLEET OR EXCEED COMi"fERCIAL STANDARE)S CLASS ~400 SEHER PIPE. S. THERE I/,,ILL BE NO PRIMATE HATER SUPPLIES. 7. HAINTAIN 7'-O" I'dININIUI'4 CLEARANCE BETHEEN HATER LINE AND ANY UNIT OH THE SANITARY SYSTEM, D LA'FOUT OF UNITS TO BE AS SIIO.~N OR SIPIILAR IN PLAN DEPENDING ON FIELD CONDITIONS. q. THERE IS NO SURFACE HATER HITFIII,1200 PERT OF TFIE PROPERTY LINE, NO IdELLS I,qiTI411',1500 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE AND NO LEACblIN® POOLS IAIITHIN I00 FEET OF 1 FIE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS SI lOT,IN ON PLAN. PLATFORNI ELEVATION CONCR~EI(- CURB AT BUlL DING N40 ~*-~B~-~ZI%~II q FIN FL EL+IB.D LOCATION &TORE& FIN FL EL+IS AREA -- PLATFORPI ELEVATION AT BUILBIN® +14.0 EXISTING 9 20' ,N P,IHIOH READ& ~ I 0 -- 24q "ONE HAY DO NOT ENTER" 12 11 DRAINAGE AS PER TOY,IN OF SOUTHOLE~-2" P, AII',IFALL-.I-/' RUN OFE FACTORS: BUILOlNG- 1.0, PAVIN®-I.O, LANDSCAPING-.2 E)R'flA!ELL CAPACIT,f- IO¢ 13R,fk,IELLS: 68 42 CF/FT, 8'¢ D}A, 42.24 CP/FT BUILOlNG: LANE)SOAPING AREA, Bt~,l OK PAVERS, D,qo-I 555 F X.l~ C.F.XI O= 1,514 C.F 1,514 C.F. TOTAL / ©S.42=22.15 L.F. 14,5~.S2S.F.X.I~ C.F X.2=482C.F.I?RAIN TO PAX/IN~ 48-1.iSCF TOTAL / S8.42=~.1q L.F 5,O~q.~q S.F.X I-/ O F.X.©=512.oq C.F. PAVEk? AREA: 512.Oq C.F. TOTAL / ©8.42=4.5© L.F. 2-/,526 265.F.X.17 C.F.XI.O= 4-,67q 46 C F 4,©~q.4© C.F. TOTAL / ©8.42 C.F./F.T.=SS.SqL.F. %OALE USE: 20 -IO'¢ L?t~-'(IA!ELLS X 5.Or DP.= SEE SITE FOR LOCATIONS 102.27 L.F. TOTAL lO0 L.F, OF DRAINAGE 5lYE NOTE5 N/F GLOVER ELEV. +10.5 TOP OF -'~'1'¥ INt~Ot~JvIATI ON AREA: 55,821 $-- IOO~qO UPANCY TFIE E~UILE)ING )E OF THE STALE OF CANTILE (STORES) - )UP 'hi' GROUP'B' )RAGE '52' ~T~UOTION CLASS ~Lr-5 REPUTED LOCATION OF &ANITARf &T~TEM 1'=20'-O' LO~ATION MAP N.T.~. I~EVI ~ION~ W S 05 AS/TOh, N ©-24 OS AS/TOHN S-25-05 AS/TOHIq, 4-16 05 AS/TOHNI 12 08-05 AS/OFiNER O6~]4-O4 AS/TO~xlN 06-25-04 AS/TOhIhl O~- Iq-C4 AS/TOY;N oq- IO-Oz. AS/TOHN IO- 18 04 AS/TOHIq 11-O8-O4 AS/TOHI'II AND STATE 12-15-O4 AS/H.P. UPPATEP CURB CUTS INVERTS ELEVATIONS O2-1S-O5 AS/TOHN 05 16-O5 AS/TOHN LANE) STANLEY I'/ALON 264 LiNPON AVENUE LINDENHURST, N.Y. 11~5~ C, OHI'4~t~.C, I AL FO~ STANLEY h'IALON HAIN STATE ~,OAD OxPI'S 25 N-r' SITE PLAN AND DETAILS I N.T.~. EXISTIN® STRUCTURE PUBLIC HATER REPUTED LOCATION O'F &ANITARY ST&TEN INSTALL SNUT-OI=F VALVE ON INLET PIPE BEFORE DEVICE INSTALLATION TO PIEET ALL N '¢ S H P [~RAINA~E TO BE POSITIVE HITN EFFLUENT VISIBLE 48" NEI®HT EL-i: 12.0 GRADE I' SANE)/LOAI'// 8.5 COARSE SANIP I~ATER/SAN~ ~',I.L. +50 TEST HOLE BT . T~fcPOIxLALD GEOSCIENCE 10/24/01 $ITE Ct~ITEI~IA PROPER r'r' LOCATED IN OUTd. HOGUE TOIA!N OF SOUTHHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, IqEl~ 'fOP-,K S.C..T.I'4 NO. IOOO-q~ S 4.5 PROPER FY AREA- PROPERT'f ZONE ~,UILE)ING AREA- I-lEST FLOOR- SECOHL) FLOOP-- G~OSS BUIL~ING LOT 55,821 S.F. GENERAL BUSINESS S,147 SF 8,147 ~.F. PA~t~-.I N~ CALCULATIONS, PARF, ilqG AS PER THE TON'IN OF SOUTEtOLI? CODE- SECTION IO0.1ql USE: RET,~IL STO~ES; I SPAC~ I~ER 2QQ SQ. PT. 5,qq© SQ ET. / .900 - 2q q8 ©POS OEEICE A~EA: I 5PACE PER IQQ SJ~. FT I BPAO~ PER IOO SQ Fl-. 7SO SQ. FT. / ICC = 7.& TOTAL SPACES REQ'L~--- 5~.2 TOTAL SPACES PROVlE)E~?' 4*5 INCLUDES 5 H/C PARKING SPACES AND I 15' x 45' x 14' HIGH LOADING ZONE ALL PARKING SPACES q'xIq' k,I/ 22' AISLES E+54.O EXISTING EJ EV N+5©.O NEF,I ELEVATION NTC+ blEIAI TOP OF CURB IqISC+ NE~4 ~OTTOi'4 OF NTF CURB IWHP I'qEM HIGH POINT FLOkx/ LINE b/A1 ER LINE GAS LiNE SEhlER LINE NEM TOP CE FRAWE ELECTRIC SERVICE btorold Ar'chit;~c f. Nockh Helh,,iood Avenue Lincienhursb, hi.Y. SCI PAX 22© 5088 J DIAIqA GOIHEZ J job n32001_51_08 HE®AR©I-I@AOL.©O~I N NOTES: 1. SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUA TED A T CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No· 1000-97-05-4.5 SCALE 1"=20' JANUARY 24, 2006 AREA = 53,821.43 sq. ff. 1,256 ac. FEB - 3 2006 ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO N,G.V.D. 1929 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN THUS: EXISTING CONTOUR LINES ARE SHOWN THUS: -- - UNAUTIIORIZED ALTERATION OR ^DBITIBN TO THIS SURVEY IS A '~OLATION 0¢ Lie No 49668 Land no Irveyor PHONE (6S0727-2090 Fax (631)727-1727 ~AILING ADDRESS NOTE. HIGHEST RECORDED HATER LEVEL - ED OLSEN DC HI?. ON 5-10-2002 IS ©.S4 FROH 14ELL NO, S5-DD2q 121 ',fl, lt ll.. 1,t ~ux IAI h~ONUFIENT RC TRAFFIC 4"4) RVC PIPE- PITCH Phi. x 24" klIPE OPENIN® 'E BAFFLE x 5'-O"H SOLID RING SEPTIC TANK - h200 GAL. (4' 0" LIQUID DEPTH) THICK RC BOTTOIq SLAB LEAGHIN® POOLS OF POOL EXISTING ADJACENT BLP¢ (RETAIL) ±5,q~O SQUARE FEET x ©'-0" PEEP DR'~ELL - TTPIOAL FOR (Il) -SANITAR"" SYSTEM DESIGN -DRY STORES- 0.05 G.P.[P. -IA[ET STORES 0 15 -NON MEDIC, AL OFFICES 0.06 GROUN[P hATER MANAGEMENT ZONE IX/ ALLO?'!ABLE CoO0 G.P.D/ACRE I 25©A X CoO0- 742 G,P P ALLOMABLE PROPOSED BLDG- SI4OPPII"IG CENTER NO TENAI',ITS AS OF THIS TIME [DESIGN ASSUMED @: 4,0CoO S.F. DRY STORES x .05 1,21.8 I,q45 S.F. MET STORES x 15 - 2ql.8 2,858 BF. OFFICE SPADE x .06 171.4 585 G.P.D. 565 .'- I 5= 5qo LE OF S'-O"¢ LEACHING POOLS(Sqo LF ? 25 SF/ET= USE 2 8'-0"© x IO'-O"H LEACHING POOLS = 20 LF PLUS I- EXPANSION POOL SEPTIC TANK TO BE 2 [PAYS FLOPS (585 GAL x 2- 1170) NEED II10 GAL SEPTIC TANK LEACHING POOLS: (I) 8'-O" ¢ X 5' O"H (4' O"L.~.) ~'-O"¢ L.P. - 25 5~.FT./FOOT GOO~ FO~ 12OO GALLON5 SUffOLK No 010-02-0011 SPR, I IxlKLER STSTENI blOT REQUI P-,ED AS PEP-- BUILPlN® C, OPE OF TEIE STATE OF NEH SECTION c105 15.Co X ~¢Ji=t~OLK C,,OUNT'f HEAl. TH ~:IE¢i. N011~¢ I, ALL PREOAST UI',Jl I-S OF THE SANITARY S'fSTETM TO BE AS h'IAI',IUFAC, TU~ED 5'r 14ELLMA~E Oo., INC,, OR APPROVE[? EQUAL. ~. THE~.E NILL BE I, IO INIPlJSTI~IAL hASTE INTO THIS SYSTEM. 5. THE~E k,,ILL BE I,,IO C, ONTANilNA-FE;? I,qASTBS I~-ETURNEP TO THE SOIL UNLESS APP~OV'E~ BT THE BOA~;? OF HEALTH. 4. MAINTAII,I C, LEARANC, ES AS SHONI',I ON PLAN. 5. ALL PIPING USE;? I1',1 THE SAI',IITAP-.T STSTEM SHALL DP- EXGEEIP COMbIEI~C, IAL STAN;?A~;?S CLASS 2400 SBMEFt PIPE S. THEP. E MILL BE I',10 P~IMATE HAFED. SUPPLIES l ?dAIl'qTAIIxl 7'-O" MINIIv]UT'4 CI EA~ANOE BETM~EN 14ATEf~ LINE AND ANY UNIT CE THE SAI',IITA~Y SY'STEH. ,5 LAYOUT OF UNITS TO BE AS SHOP,IN OP. SIbIILAP-. IN PLAN PEPEN;?IIqG ON F'IEL;? C, ONPlTIONS q. THERE IS NO SUP. PAGE ½LATE~ J/,/ITFIIBI ~OO FEET OF THE PROPEP. T¥ LIIqE, NO I/qELLS P,[ITHIN 5OO FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE AND NO LEAC, HING POOLS b,IITHIN IOO FEET Of THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS SHOHN ON PLAN. r.,12.~ e*o o q OF ~ FIN FL EL+ID.5 q F IN,FL,EL-115.5 LU q'50"E ~ SIGN HHICH REAPS. r- 24q.58' I"fONUMENT I At~EA "ONE MAy-DO NOT ENTER" EXISTING NE/'L SIGN LOCATE[? B~ N/F KAELIN BY' STAIqLE'Y 4. ISAK _lq, U.S. J I I..,O .ATION MAt SC, ALE 1"=20'-0" 24"¢ CASTIRON FRAME AND COVERS- ~ATER 4 INSECT PITOH P4" PER FOOT 8 INSTALL SHUT-OFF VALVE ON INLET PIPE BEFORE DEVI©E ON ALL REQUIREHENTS, PEVIOE INSTALLATION TO h4EET ALL N ¥ S H D ~ OOUNT'f CERTIFIED TESTE~ lO. DEVICE Pt/ST DE TESTED AT LEAST ANNUALLY DRAINAGE TQ BE POSITIVE FILTH EFFLUENT VISIBLE 12, ROTATE VALVES IF NEOESSART TO HAINTAIN [DRAINAGE AS PER TO/4N OF SOUTHOL[P-2" RAINFALL-.M' RUiN OFF FACTORS: BUlL[PING- I.O, PAVING-I,O, LANPSC, APING-.2 BRICK PAVERS .6 DRY'lA, ELL CAPACITY- I06 DR'r%IFLLS: 6842 CF/PT, 8'¢ PI4. 4,2 24 CE/FT BUILDING: LAN[PSOAPING AREA.- BRIC~ PAVERS: PAVE[P AREA: USE: 20 -I0'¢ [PR'T'P'IELLS X 5.0' E)P.= SEE SITE --OR LOOATIONS 8,qo1556.F.X 17 O F.XI.O= 1,514 1,514 C.E. TOTAL / 6S.42=22.15 L.F. ;4,327.626.F.XJ7 O.FX.2 4870.F.19RAIN TO PAVll,h 4DT.150F TOTAl_ / 68.42=71q L.F. 5,Obq.Tq SP.X M O.F.X.S:512.oq 6.F. ~lAOq O.F. TOTAL / ~8.4~:4.56 L.E. 27,526265.F.X.M G.FXI.O= 4,6~q4SOF 4,S7q 4~ O.F. TOTAL / 68.42 O.F./F.T.-SS.Sq L.F IO2.~7 L.F. TOTA IOO LE OF ~AINAGE I NI OI MATI49N SITE A~ -- 55,D21~ BUlL[PIN 15% PAVED 27,5265 51~ LAN]PS ;APING.-- I~,lZT. 8$ 54?o UHPEV LOPED: Ore c)~o EA AREA: 8,147m UPANCY' THE BUILDING )E OF THE STATE OF NY. C/., qT (STORES) - DUI~ 'M' AREA: 55,8~1 $ 24 O5 AB/TOMN 25-05 AS/TOHN NObEl 12.0 GPA[DE I' SAN[P/LOAM H 5' LOAM/SAND F ,5 ~'COARSE SAND HA rER/SAN[P TEST HOLE B'f , McDONAL[P GEOSC-IENCE 10/24/01 PROPERTY LOCATED IN CUTCHOGUE TOkxLN OF SOUTHHOLP, SUFFOLK OOUNT'T', NEIAL YORK S.C T.M. NO. I000-q7-5 4.5 PROPERT'f AREA- PROPERT'f ZONE BUILDING AREA= E ID-ST FLOOR- SECON[P FLOOR- BASEMENT- 55,S21 S.F. GENERAL BUSINESS 'B' 8,14T S F 8,141 S.F. GROSS BUILDING AREA:IT,054 S.F LOT COVERAGE. 16% ALCUIATleN$ L.±5 0 4 18-05 AS/TOJ4hl 12-08-05 AS/OMIqERL 06 14 04 AS/TOMN 0©-25 04- AS/TOM],I Ol Iq-04 AS/TOblH oq 10-04 AB/TOMN I0- 15-04 AS/TOHN II O5 04 AS/TOMI'i Al,IF STATE 12 I~ 04 AS/HP, UPPATEP CURB CUTS 05-16 05 AS/TOHN :ICES GROUP'B' PEACE 'SI' NSTRUCTIOi',I CLASS hAl'/D OMNNR: STANLE'r MALON 264 LINPOi',I AVENUE LINPENFIURST, N.Y'. I IISI INCLUDES 5 il/&. PARKJNG SPACES ANE) I - 15' x 4-5' x 14' HIGH LOADING ZONE ALL PARKING SPACES q'XIq' 14/ 22' AISLES E+540 EXISTrNG ELEV N+56.O NEM ELEVATION --14-- NTC+ NEbL TOP OF CURB S NBC+ HE//,[ BOTTOM OF NTF CURB I'ql~P blEIAI HiGH POINT FLO/4 LINE IAIATE R LINE GAS LINE SE,dER LINE /'.1E IA/ TOP 01= I=RANIE ELECTRIC, SERVIc,E SITE PLAN ,A, Np DETAILS I H rolc E, ®e h rd 505 Nonl:h Melh,~oocl Avenue LIndenhucs~, N.Y ll251 FAX 226 ~0~ HEGA~GH~AOL.O0~ PARKING AS PER THE TOJAIN OF SOUTHOLP COPE- SECTION I00 iql USE: RETAIL STORES: I SPACE PER 2QQ SQ. FT 5,qq6 SQFT / 200 : --2q.q8 SPCS OEFICE AREA: I SPACE PER I00 SQFT I,q64 S~. FT. / IOO - Iq.CoSPCS OiA~NER'S OEFJCE: r SPACE PER rQO SQ FT. 7CoQ SQ FT. / I00 - T.6 SPCS TOTAL SPAC, ES R~Q'P 5~ 2 TOTAL SNAOES P~OVIP~- 48 MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE ~O~~oF SOUryo~ Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~ Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR ~ Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON ~ ~O (cor. Main Rd. & Younga Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND ~~yCOU'M'~~ Southold, NY I'l11 Telephone: 831 785-1838 Fax: 831 785-3138 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 24, 2006 ' ~ _ - j Mr. Stanley Malon 2 6 Malon Industries, Inc. ~ 264 Linton Avenue ~ ~ , ' ~ Lindenhurst, NY 11757 Re: Site Plan inspection and satisfaction letter for Malon Industries, Inc. 32845 Main Road, Cutchogue SCTM 1000-97-5-4.5 Zoning District: Business (B) District Dear Mr. Malon, At your written request for a Certificate of Occupancy final site inspection, Planning Department staff performed a site visit on July 19, 2006. In reference to the above, the Planning Board held a work session on July 24, 2006 to review two site plans as follows: • Site plan approved on Apri112, 2005 prepared and certified by Harold E. Gebhard a Licensed Architect, dated December 11, 2003 and last revised March 16, 2005. • Amended site plan approved on April 12, 2005 prepared by Harold E. Gebhard, Architect dated December 11, 2003 and last revised February 15, 2006 and the following Architectural Plans A-1, A-4 & A-5 dated Apri118, 2005 and last revised December 9, 2005. Additionally, the Planning Board reviewed and accepts the amended site plan prepared by Harold E. Gebhard, Architect dated December 11, 2003 and last revised July 3, 2006 detailing the location change of the free standing sign. Subject to the final approval of this sign must meet Southold Town Zoning Codes and shall be approved by the Southold Town Building Inspector. This is to inform you that the site plan requirements have been satisfied. This letter does not condone any changes from the approved site plan and approvals from other agencies if required. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Board Office at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, E.~ LC~-OL-of.~-~-vLG erilyn B. oodhouse Chairperson cc:file, Building Department, Town Engineer