HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-40.-5-1 JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hail, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-~801
August 2, 1985
Mr. John A. Costello
206 Wiggins Lane
Greenport, New York 11944
Dear John:
Enclosed herewith is the Resolution and Determination of the
Southold Town Board, and the Order of the Southold Town Board
with respect to your petition for annexation of 48.7 acres to the
Village of Greenport.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Enclosures (2)
cc:
Charles T. Hamilton, DEC, Stony Brook
Commissioner Williams, DEC, Albany
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Village of Greenport
Pelletreau & Pelletreau
William W. Esseks, Esq.
Howard E. Pachman, Esq.
Peconic Associates, Inc.
Southold Town Planning Board~
Southold Town Building Department
At a Meeting of the Town Board of
the Town of Southold, Suffolk County
New York held on the 30th day of
July, 1985.
PRESENT:
Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor
Joseph L. Townsend, Jr., Councilman
James A. Schondebare, Councilman
Jean W. Cochran, Councilwoman
Paul Stoutenburgh, Councilman
Raymond W. Edwards, Justice
Members of the Town Board
In the Matter
of the
Petition of East End Associates for Annexation of
Territory to the Village of Greenport.
RESOLUTION
AND DETERMINATION
The following resolution was offered by Councilman Schondebare
seconded bY Councilman Stoutenburgh
WHEREAS, East End Associates has heretofore presented a petition to this
board requesting that the territory described in said petition be annexed to
the Village of Greenport, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing with respect to said petition was duly held
jointly with the Board of Trustees of the Village of Greenport on the 6th day
of December, 1984, to hear any testimony and receive evidence and information
which may be presented concerning the said
whether the proposed annexation is or is not
and
WHEREAS, this Board was determined to
provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental
petition and the question of
in the overall public interest,
be lead agency pursuant to the
Conservation Law by resolution
duly adopted on the 18th day of December, 1984, and
WHEREAS, by resolution duly adopted on the 8th day of January, ~1985,~
this Board determined that the annexation requested in said petition was likely
to have a significant adverse affect upon the environment, and that the
petitioner shall prepare a draft environmental impact statement, and
WHEREAS, upon the completion of such draft environmental impact
statement and the filing and acceptance thereof, this Board held a public
hearing thereon, pursuant to due notice, on the 16th day of May, 1985, and
WHEREAS, this Board thereafter by resolution adopted on the 4th day of
June, 1985, determined that the proposed annexation was likely to have a
significant adverse affect upon the environment and requested that the
petitioner prepare and file a final environmental impact statement, and
WHEREAS, upon the completion, filing and acceptance of the final
environmental 'impact statement this Board duly adopted a resolution on the
16th' '~lay of July, 1985, determining that the proposed annexation was not
likely to have a significant affect upon the environment for the reasons set
forth therein,
NOW, THEREFORE, this board does hereby make the following findings
and determinations with respect to compliance of the said petition with the
provisions of Article 17 of the General Municipal Law and with respect to the
affect of such proposed annexation on the overall public interest, to wit:
I. That the said petition substantially complies in form with the
provisions of Article 17 of the General Municipal Law.
I1~ That the proposed annexation is not in the overall public interest (1)
of the territory proposed to be annexed, or (2) on the remaining area of the
Town of Southold in which such territory is situated, for the following
reasons, to wit:
(a) Zoning and Plann!ng. As indicated on the map annexed to said
petition, the area of the territory sought to be annexed comprises 48.7186
acres of vacant land. The land on the south and west of the territory in
question is within the incorporated Village of Greenport and owned by the
Village of Greenport and is uninhabited land utilized for park and watershed
purposes by the Village. The land to the east and north (across North Road,
County Route 48) is outside the incorporated limits of the Village of
Greenport and is used, occupied and zoned for one family' dwelling pu~pose~'.
The territory sought to be annexed and the land lying to the north and east
thereof is within the present "A" Residential and Agricultural District under
the Town of Southold Building Zone Ordinance which provides for a minimum
size lots of 80,000 square feet. The zoning ordinance of the Village of
Greenport adopted in October, 1971, provides that areas annexed to the Village
shall be in the R-1 zoning district which requires a minimum lot size of 10,000
square feet without regard to whether public sewer or water is provided.
Therefore, if the territory in question were annexed to the Village of
Greenport, the zoning requirements of the Village of Greenport would permit
eight times the number of dwellings to be built than is allowed by the Town's
current zoning code.
"fhe petitioner, at the public hearing, held pursuant to Article 17 of the
General Municipal Law, and the hearing on the draft environmental impact
statement indicated that it was proposed to develop the land in the territory
to be annexed by subdividing a portion thereof into in excess of 70 lots of
10,000 to 15,000 sq. ft. in area for sale as single family dwelling plots to
provide "affordable homes" for local residents. Petitioner also proposes to
seek a rezoning of the westerly portion of the property to permit the c~eation
of eight plots each containing approximately 3 acres, to be sold for the
establishment of commercial uses thereon. At the present time, the Village of
Greenport has no laws or regulations providing for the approval of plats, nor
any standards and specifications regulating the construction of streets and
other required facilities and improvements to be constructed therein, as
authorized by Article 7 of the Village Law.
The petitioner, at the hearing held on the annexation petition, indicated
that if the annexation is approved, he desires that Town Planning Board have
jurisdiction of the development of the proiect rather than the Village Planning
Board, since the Town Planning Board has in effect rules and regulations
governing the subdivision of land and standards for the construction of the
required facilities, as well as many years of experience in such matters,
whereas the Village of Greenport has no such rules, regulations or
experience. There appears to be no objection to such procedure voiced by th~
Trustees of the Village of Greenport. In furtherance of such desire, the
petitioner, during the pendency of this proceeding, has filed plans and maps
with the Town Planning Board for the development of the subject property
and attended several meetings of said Board with respect thereto. With
respect to the Planning Board exercising jurisdiction with respect to plat
approval
and the supervision of the construction and development of the
subiect property, if annexed to the Village of Greenport, the simple answer
is that neither the Town or any of its boards, agencies, officials or
employees have any jurisdiction, powers or authority in such matters with
respect to land located outside the territorial boundaries of the Town.
As previously indicated, the petitioner proposes to seek the rezoning of
a su'~stantial portion of the subject property to commercial uses. The area to
be rezoned is located along the westerly portion of the property abutting
Moores Lane (a Village Street). On the west side of Moores Lane is
approximately 250 ~acres of land owned by the Village of Greenport and
dedicated for watershed and park purposes. Under the Town zoning map and
zoning code, all other surrounding land is zoned for single family residential
use. To create a commercial use zone district as proposed by petitioner
would, in this Board's opinion, constitute spot zoning, and further would be
in conflict with the Town's Comprehensive Plan for the future development of
the Town. It is also this Board's opinion that the establishment of such a
commercial zone in close proximity to the planned development of the
remainder of the subject property for single family residential uses would not
public interest of the homeowners purchasing such
be in the overall
residential sites.
(b) Real Property Taxes. The subject property is presently
assessed on the current tax rolls of the Town of Southold at an assessed
valuation of $14,400.00. The current taxes for Town, County, School and
Special District purposes is $5,103.81,
purposes is $693.24.
The current Town Tax rates
and inside the Village of Greenport per $1,000.00 of assessed value are:
Outside Village $69. 324
Inside Village 26. 765
of which the'tax for general town
(1984-85) for real property outsi~de
The current (1985-86) Village of Greenport tax rate per $1,000.00
of assessed value is $148.30.
If annexation is approved, the Town and Village taxes
$1,000.00 of assessed valuation would be $175.07.
If annexation is ..... "~ ...... ~.o~-,~ the Town taxes per $1,000~00 of
assessed valuation would be $69.32.
purposes
$175.32,
per
If annexation is approved, real property taxes for Town and Village
per $1,000.00 of assessed valuation will increase from $69.32 to
an increase of 152.54%. Such a significant tax increase cannot be
deemed in the overall public interest of the future homeowners purchasing
lots in the territory in question, and would not appear to be consistent with
petitioner's purported purposes of providing "affordable housing".
(c) Water and Sewer. Petitioner asserts that his principal reason
for having the subject premises annexed to the Village of Greenport is to
qualify for hook-up to the municipal water and sewer systems of the Village
of G reenport.
The Village of Greenport now
within its franchise area, which
holds a franchise to supply water service
embraces a substantial area in the Town
outside of the Village's incorporated limits. The territory sought to be
annexed is within the Village's franchise area. The Village presently services
more water customers outside the Village than within the Village. As the
holder of such franchise, the Village is obligated to supply water services to
the subject property under the same terms and conditions as it presently does
to the residential communities to the north (Eastern Shores) and to the East
(Fleetfield) of the subject property, whether or not it is annexed to the
Village.
The petitioner also asserts that if the subject premises is not annexed,
he will be
charge of
approved,
charge. It
required by the Village to pay it a water and sewer hook-up
$4,500.00 to $5,000.00 per lot. Presumably, if annexation is
such charge will be waived. No explanation is given for such
has not been extracted in other similar instances (i.e. San Simeon
Retirement Community). The only conclusion that can be drawn is that the
Village seeks to increase its tax base by withholding its water and sewer
services, unless annexation is approved.
There appears to be no rational reason why a hook-up charge is
demanded by the Village for sewer and water extensions outside the Village,
and no such charge made for such extensions within the Village, unless it is
assumed that such charges within the Village are defrayed by taxes assessed
against al'l the taxable real property 'within the Village. I1~ such is the policy
of the Village, then to approve the annexation of the subiect territory would
not be in the overall public interest of the present taxpayers of the Village of
G reenport.
For the reasons hereinbefore set forth, this Board does hereby
DETERMINE that it is not in the overall public interest to approve such
proposed annexation of the territory set forth in the petition of I~ast £nd
Associates.
The foregoing resolution was duly put to a vote which resulted as
follows:
Supervisor Murphy voting Yes
Councilman Townsend voting No
Councilman Schondebare . voting Yes
Councilwoman Cochran . voting Yes
Councilman Stoutenburgh . voting Yes
Justice Edwards voting No
The resolution was declared duly ADOPTED.
-6-
CERTIFICATE
I, JUDITH T. TERRY, Town Clerk of the Town of $outhold, in the
County of Suffolk, State of New York, HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing
annexed Resolution and Determination of the Town Board of said Town
adopted on the 301~day of July ,, 1985, has been compared by me
with ~l~e original Resolution as officially recorded in my office in the Minute
Book of said Town Board, and is a true, complete and correct copy thereof
and of the whole of said original Resolution.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
corporate seal of said Town this 30th.day of July , 1985.
· Judith T. Terry, Town~lerk
(SEA,L)
PRESENT:
At a Meeting of the Town Board of the
Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New
York held on the30tllJay of July ,
1985.
Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor
Joseph L. Townsend, Jr., Councilman
James A. Schondebare, Councilman
Jean W. Cochran, Counciiwoman
Paul Stoutenburgh, Councilman
Raymond W. Edwards, Justice
Members of the Town Board
In the Matter
of the
Petition of East End Associates for Annexation of
Territory to the Village of Greenport.
ORDER
There having been presented to this Town Board a petition of East End
Associates requesting that the territory described in said petition be annexed
to the Village of Greenport; and a public hearing with respect to said petition
having been duly held jointly with the Board of Trustees of the Village of
Greenport on the 6th day of December, 1985 to hear any testimony, and
receive evidence and information which may be presented concerning the said
petition and the question of whether the proposed annexation is or is not in
the overall public interest; and this Town Board having, by a resolution duly
adopted on the30thday of July , 1985, duly determined that it was
not in the overall public ~nterest to consent to the annexation of the territory
described in said petition; Now, on motion of Councilman Schondebare
seconded by Supervisor Murphy it is
ORDERED that this Town Board does hereby determine that it is not in
the overall public interest to approve the proposed annexation of the territory
described in the said petition of East End Associates and does hereby
disapprove such proposed annexation and does not consent to the same; and
it is further
ORDERED, that the Town Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this
order, together with copies of the petition, the notice, the written objections,
if any, and testimony and minutes of proceedings taken and kept on the
hearing, to be filed in the office of the clerk of the Village of Greenport; and
it is further
ORDERED, that the Town Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this order
to be filed in the office of the County Clerk of the Count)/.~of,Suffolk.] /
~ (ti~ F" ncis J. Murphy
Councilman Paul Stoutenbur~h
~C~u n ci Iw~a 5:~h ran
yncilman Josel~h L. Townsen/d,~' Jr.
CERTIFICATE
I, JUDITH T. TERRY, Town Clerk of the Town of Southold, in the
County. of .... o1.., State ~ew ~u..~, .~=.~, CERTIFY that the foregoing
annexed Order of the Town Board of said Town made on the30thday of July
., 1985, has been compared by me with the original Order as officially
recorded in my office in the Minute Book of said Town Board,and is a true,
complete and correct copy thereof and of the whole of said original Order.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
corporate seal of said Town this 30thday of July , 1985.
,/
~Judith T. Terry, Town Cle~
T 0~{
S~T'¥
$outhold, N.Y. 11971
($16) 765-1938
July 30, 1985
Southold Town Board
Town Hall
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Costello project
Dear Boardmembers:
One of the questions raised on the Costello project was,
how can we be assured that the proposal will not change upon
annexation.
As per our discussion, enclosed is a copy of covenants and
restrictions from Mr. Costello indicating that the site plan
will be subject to the approval of the Town Planning Board, if
the property is annexed.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chair~
Southold Town Planning Board
dms
cc: Town Clerk
DECLARATION
DECLARATION made this day of , 1985
between JOHN A. COSTELLO (hereinafter "Costello") residing at 206
w~i~s Lane, Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New
Yo~k, party of the first party and the TOWN O~ SOUTHOLD, a
municipal corportaion with its principal place of business at
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, and the VILLAGE OF GREENPORT,
a municipal corporation with principal place of business at 236
Third Avenue, Greenport, New York, parties of the second part.
WHEREAS Costello is the owner of a certain premises
described upon Schedule A annexed hereto, and
WHEREAS said property is situate within the Town of
Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, and
WHEREAS Costello's predecessor in interest, to wit, East
End Associates, heretofore petitioned the Town of Southold and the
village of Greenport pursuant to General Municipal Law Article 17
to have the property, which is described upon Schedule A annexed
hereto, annexed to and made a part of the village of Greenport,
and
WHEREAS the subject property is now subject to the
jurisdiction of the Town Board of the Town of Southold and the
Planning Board of the Town of Southold, and
WHEREAS the consent of the Town of Southold is necessary
in order to effectuate the "annexation" detailed in the foregoing
petition.
WHEREAS Costello, as successor to East End Associates,
is desirous of assuring both the village of Greenport and the Town
of Southold that the subject property will only be employed for
uses and pursuant to a site plan that meets the approval of the
appropriate "Boards" of both municipalities, and
WHEREAS the covenant set forth in this instrument shall
only be effective if, as and when the subject property becomes,
and so long as it remains, within the territorial boundaries of
the village of Greenport;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, John A. Costello,
herewith covenants and agrees as follows:
1. This covenant will run with the land and be
enforceable by the village of Greenport, Town of Southold and/or
the property owners who from time to time may own the subject
premises or any portion thereof.
2. This covenant shall become effebtive and shall be
enforceable only if, as and when the subject property becomes a
part, and continues to be a part, of the Incorporated village of
Greenport.
3. No change in the zoning use regulations or the
dimensional regulations of the subject property shall be effective
unless and until approved by a majority of the Planning Board of
the Town of Southold.
4. No site plan, which may hereafter be approved for
the subject premises, shall be effective unless and until approved
by a majority of the then Planning Board of the Town of Southold.
5. The foregoing necessary consents and/or approvals of
the Planning Board and/or the Town Board of the Town of Southold
are in addition to all othe~necessary approvals which are required
by law, code or regulation.
S~T¥
Southold. N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
July 22, 1985
Southold Town Board
Town of Southold
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Costello Project
Gentlemen:
The Planning Board is deeply interested in having the above
project broughttofruition regardless of which governmental body
handles the situation.
We might suggest that a meeting with the Town and Village
officials might resolve this matter to the advantage of all
concerned and provide affordable housing.
We are available to assist in any way we can.
Very truly yours, A ~
Bennett Orlowski'i Jr. Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
dms /
cc: T~n Clerk
%/Town Attorney
WHEREAS, the Town of Southold has received a petition for
an annexation of some 48.7 + acres to the Village of Greenport, and
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Southold has been
designated as the lead agency for this action pursuant to SEQRA,
on , 1984, and
WHEREAS, by resolution dated Jaunary 8, 1985, the Town Board
as lead agency determined that the proposed action is a Type I action
and likely to have a significant impact on the environment and that
an environmental impact statement be prepared by the applicant,
East End Associates, and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Board and the Greenport Village
Board of Trustees conducted a joint public hearing on the annexation
petition on December 6, 1984, and
WHEREAS, on February 15, 1985 one John A. Costello took title
to the premises, the subject Qf the~proposed~action, and
WHEREAS, on March 5, 1985 by letter to the Town of Southold
and Village of Greenport agreed to complete the draft environmental
impact statement (DEIS), and
WHEREAS, said DEIS was found to be complete and sufficient for
review by Town Board resolution dated, 1985, and circulated
for public comment, and
WHEREAS, a hearing on said DEIS was held on May 16, 1985 following
a public comment period, and
WHEREAS, by resolution dated on June 4, 1985 the Town Board directed
the applicant to prepare a final EIS (FEIS) to address concerns
raised at the public hearing and by the Town Board, and
WHEREAS, the comment period on said FEIS expired on July 8,
1985, and
WHEREAS, 6NYCRR 617.9(c) requires that the Town Board make
findings before rendering a decision on the proposed action, now
therefore, be it
RESOLVED that pu~ant to 6NYCRR 617.9 (c) the Town Board
makes the following findings for the petition of John A. Costello
for 48.7 acres proposed to be annexed_to thefViltage of Greenport:
A. Ail SEQR Procedural Requirements Have Been Complied With.
1. All requirements of SEQR and Chapter 44 of the Town Code
have been complied with.
2. The Town Board has given consideration to the DEIS, public
comments thereon, and the FEI$ and comments thereon.
B. The Proposed Annexation Will Not Have a Significant
Adverse Effect on the Environment.
1. The annexation and subsequent rez~n~ng to the R-1 Zoning
classifaction of the Village of Greenport will not have a significant
effect on the environment.
2. P~tential negative impacts have been identified in the DEIS,
and measures to mitigate adverse impacts have been proposed in the
DEIS and FEIS.
3. Any proposed development on the premises proposed to be
annexed to the Village of Greenport would be subject to a SEQR
determination at the time it is submitted for local approval.
4. In addition, a development proposed within the corporate
limits of the Village of Greenport needing municipal utility
provisions to service it can promote social and economic benefit to
both the Village of Greenport and the Town of Southold.
C. Summary
~he SEQR findings can be summarized as follows:
1. The proposed annexation of 48.7 acres to the Village of
Greenport will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. The concomitant rezoning from RA to R-1 will not have a
significant effect on the environment.
3. Mitigative measure to minimize potential adverse impacts
of development proposed Under the Village Zoning Ordinance have
been incorporated into the FEIS.
4. Development proposed in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance
of the Village of Greenport would again be subject to SEQR at
the time of sub~i~-~.
D. Conclusion
1. Consistent with social, economic and other essential
considerations, from among the reasonable alternatives examined
in the SEQR process for the proposed action, the annexation under
consideration minimizes adverse environmental effects to the
maximum extent practicable, including the effects disclosed in
the DEIS and FEIS.
2. Consistent with social, economic and other considerations,
adverse impacts revealed in th~ SEQR process will be minimized
to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating those mitigative
measures in the DEIS and FEIS into any development(s) or project (s)
under the jurisdiction of the Village of Greenport.
T ~ L
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
May 8, 1985
Mr. Howard Pachman
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 273
366 Veterans Memorial Highway
Commack, NY 11725
Re: Proposed zoning for Moore% Lane Property
Dear Mr. Pachman:
Your request for information relative to the above was
forwarded to our office from the Town Clerk's Office.
Enclosed is a copy of the zoning map with the proposed
zoning for the Moore's Lane property, as well as, a copy of the
proposed zoning ordinance outlining the permitted uses.
Please forward payment for the copies in the amount
of $3.75 (15 copies at .25 per copy) at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN
.~SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
-~y Diane e, Secretary
enc.
To: To~n Board, Town of Southold
ViLlage Board, Village of Greenport
Gentlemen:
P.O. Box A-F
Greenport, N.Y. 11944
December 14, 1984
For those of us ~ho have seen other communities on Long Island
struggle to deal with tho need for providing balanced housing for residents
at aLl economic levels, it se~s regrettable that the realities of present
day housing costs are not being faced in the planning for the Town of
Southold.
For at least fifteen years, it has been impossible for the average
American f~m~]y to begin life with tho purchase of a one-family house. Not
Just in cities, but in suburbs and rural areas, apartments are the only hope
for providing affordable housing for a growing percentage of our national
population. In the case of Southold, where fish-processing, canvas products
and other factories are competing with other iow-cost labor areas and
themselves pay much more than $5 an hour for much of their help, the need for
apartments is especially urgent if we are not to keep losing workers or have
to close our eyes to having thom illegally housed in overcrowded dwellings
which breed health and social problems.
The proposal to ~ex 48 acres of Town land to the Village of
Greenport offers a chance to begin addressing Southold's housing crisis
because Greenport can readily supply the water and sewer connections needed
by an apartment complex. However, the present plan for use of the 48 acres,
as reported in the press, does not bear the slightest similarity to a plan
which would make an adequate contribution to the worker housing needs it
claims to address. The single-family houses it contemplates would cost so
much that only young executives could hope to own them. In addition, the
extensive commercial development proposed on the plot would generate a dem-nd
for still more low-paid workers and actually aggravate tho problem of labor
shortage which exists in the Town, notwithstanding unemployment statistics.
The coments of Henry Tasker, Esq. at the hearing on this project
clearly indicate that the present proposal is unlikely to survive a legal
challenge because it appears designed more to enrich the developers by allowing
them to down zone 2-Acre residential land than to save local industry and
assure it of an adequate supply of iow-paid workers. This may not be the intent
of the developers, but, ass,rm~g their good will, they have not thought out
the practical conseq~nces of their proposal in the housing sector.
To m~e the proposal viable in the face of litigation, it must make
a much more generous contribution to the general welfare of the community and,
in particular, to the Iow-paid workers who will be employed in its c~ercial
areae This might well be in the form of establishing two zones in the resi-
dential portion of the property, one for single-family houses- or two-family
houses, ~t one for apartments of appropriate density. At least five acres of
the residential area should be donated free to the Village of Greenport, which
would be obligated to pursue w~atever subsidized housing program se~m~ best
likely to provide affordable houaing for workers on them. The cost of this 1~t
to the developer would be compensated for by the rise in value of the rest cf
tho land in down zoning. Use of low-cost cooperative ownerahiv wpuld assure a
tenancy of stable f-m~lies and reliable workers~ ~ , ~/~f~ /.~_~-yc
cc: Press Sincerely yours, ..~_~-/-.,~J~V
Frederi'ck S. Lightfoot u /
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL SI\I[SFI('S
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 1197t
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1801
NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
Dated: January 8, :1985
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation
Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations,
and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board, as lead
agency, does hereby determine that the ,action described below is a Type I
,action and is likely to have' a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Petition of East End Associates for the annexation of approximately 48.7
acres of land in the unincorporated portion of the Town of Southold into the
Incorporated Village of Greenport, said property being located at the corner
formed by the intersection of the southerly side of North Road (C.R. 48) and
the easterly side of Moores Lane, Greenport.
Further information may be obtained by. contacting Mrs. Judith T. Terry,
Southold Town Clerk, Southold Town Hall, Main:Road, Southold, New York 11971.
· copies to:
Charles T. Hamilton, DEC, Stony Brook
Commissioner Williams, DEC, Albany
Southold Town Building Department
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Village of Greenport
Pelletreau & Pelletreau
William W. Esseks, Esq.
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL S[\IISFICS
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
January 9, 1985
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1801
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 8, 1985:
WHEREAS, East End Associates has heretofore applied to the Southold Town Board,
pursuant to Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, for the annexation of
approximately 48.'/ acres of land in the unincorporated portion of the Town of
Southold into the Incorporated Village of Greenport, said property being located at
the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of North Road (C.R. 48)
and the easterly side of Moores Lane, Greenport,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conserva-
tion Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations,
and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency,
does hereby determine that the action proposed is a Type I action and is likely to have
a significant effect on the environment.
2. That the Town Clerk shall file' and circulate such determination as required
by the aforementioned law, rules and code.
3. That the Town Clerk immediately notify the applicant, East End Associates,
of this determination and further request said applicant to prepare a draft environmental
impact statement, all in accordance with said law, rules and code.
dith T. Terry ~
Southold Town Clerk
December ~7,1984
To The Plannin~ Board
Town of Southold,
Main Road, Southold, ~.Y.11971
Dear Members:
We are in bores that you have not comRleted your decision
as yet, concerning the Annexation petition of East End
Associates.
We are in hopes that you will give it some serious thought.
It seems that to take one of the mo~t choicest ~i$~sof property
out this way,that is residential and chan~e it over to
commercial and fifty- foot lots will Just ruin this section
of Southold Town.
Sincerely Yours
Irene & Willard Crayton
~ 7 Middleton Road,
Green~ort, N.Y. 11944
JUDITIt T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL $ [ \[ IS'IICS
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 19, 1984:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1801
Charles T. Hamilton
Alternate Regional Permit Administrator
N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation
Building 40, SUNY - Room 2,19
Stony Brook, New York 11794
Dear Mr. Hamilton:
Enclosed is the petition and Long Environmental Assessment Form
submitted by East End Associates relative to their petition for the
annexation of approximately 48.7 acres of land in the unincorporated
portion of the Town of Southold into the Incorporated Village of Greenport.
This project is unlisted and we wish to coordinate this action in
our role of lead agency.
May we have your view on this matter. Written comments on this
proposal will be received at this office until January 7, 1985. We shall
interpret your' lack of response to mean there is no objection by your
agency.
Very truly yours,
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
EnclOsures
· CC:
Commissioner Williams
$outhold Town Building Department
Southold Town Planning
Gi'eenport Village Clerk
In the Matter of the Application of
EAST END ASSOCIATES,
Pursuant to Article 17 of the
General Municipal Law to annex a
parcel of property to the territory of
the Village of Greenport
Petitioner,
TO: TO~ BOARD OF THE TO~ OF SOUTHOLD
VILLAGE TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF GREENPORT
The petition of EAST END ASSOCIATES respectfully shows
as follows:
1. This is a petition pursuant to Article 17 of the
General Municipal Law to annex to the territory of the Village of
Greenport, Suffolk County, New York, a parcel of property owned by
petitioner, East End Associates, which property is situate within
the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York as more
particularly bound and described upon Schedule A annexed hereto.
2. Petitioner, East End Associates, is a partnership
organized and existing pursuant to the laws of the State of'New
York. The memkars of the partnership and their respective
addresses are set forth upon Schedule B annexed hereto.
3. This petition is submitted to the Town Board of the
Town of Southold (hereinafter "Town of Southold") and to the
Trustees of the Villaqe of Greenport (hereinafter "Village of
Greenport") for the purposes of having the Town of Southold
to the annexation of the property described in paragraph 1
consent
hereof to the Village of Greenport.
4. There are no "inhabitants" of the subject property
as defined in S703 of the General Municipal Law.
5. The owners of a majority in assessed valuation of
the subject property, as shown upon the last preceding assessment
roll of the Town of Southold, joins herewith.
6. Annexed hereto as Schedule C is a certificate of the
Assessor of the Town of Southold pursuant to ~703 of the General
Municipal Law.
WHEREFORE, petitioner prays that the governing parties
of the Village of Greenport and Town of Southold, pursuant to
Article 17 of the General Municipal Law, entertain this petition.
Dated: October 29, 1984
EAS~.~END ASSOCIATES, Petitioner
~?~e~fal Partner - ~oH~ -J.
STATE OF NEW YORK)
COUNTY OF~I~ )ss.:
Z,'//;~ ~,'~o~ S , being duly sworn, deposes and
says: I reside at ~o~ ~ ~c ~ in the County
of 5o~ol I< in the State ~C ~o ' know each of the
persons whose names are subscribed to the above sheet having ~
signature~; and each of them subscribed the same in my presence.
Sworn to before me this
2~ day of ,~eVcrqL~' ,
Notary Public ~/
1984.
GLORIA G. O'MALLEY
NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York
No. 4803 ! 37 Suffolk County (~/'~
Commission Expires March 30, 19D. P
SCHEDULE A
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land lying
being at or near the Village of Greenport, Town of Southold,
County of Suffolk and State of New York, more particularly
described as follows:
and
BEGINNING at the corner formed by the intersection of
the southerly side of North Road with the easterly side of Moores
Lane:
RUNNING THENCE North 66 degrees 09 minutes 10 seconds
East along said southerly side of North Road, 96.61 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 69 degrees 02 minutes 10 seconds
East still along said southerly side of North Road, 985.10 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 71 degrees 28 minutes 20 seconds
East still along said southerly side of North Road, 342.64 feet
land now or formerly of Henry Fleet and Clarence Fleet, now or
formerly known as "Fleetfield";
to
RUNNING THENCE South 16 degrees 01 minutes 50 seconds
East along said last mentioned land and along land now or formerly
of Constant Booth and the heirs of Silas Webb 1450.11 feet to land
now or formerly of the Village of Greenport;
RUNNING THENCE South 58 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds
West along said last mentioned land 714.04 feet;
RUNNING THENCE South 74 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds
West still along said last mentioned land 6~0.00 feet to the
easterly side of Moores Lane; _~'
RUNNING THENCE North 17 degrees 15 miHutees 00 seconds
West along said easterly side of Moores Lane 1523.22 feet to the
corner, the point or place of BEGINNING.
SCHEDULE B
NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PARTNERS IN EAST END ASSOCIATES
John J. Hart, Jr., 20 Church Street, Patchogue, N.Y. 11772;
Estate of Richard A. Schoenfeld, c/o Frederic Atwood, 20 Church
Street, Patchogue, N.Y. 11772;
Louis J. Scordamaglia, M.D., 284 Beaver Dam Rd., Brookhaven, N.Y.
11719;
Robert A. Seigel, 260 Private Road, East Patchogue, N.Y. 11772;
James R. Warner, 10 Rogers Lane, Bellport, N.Y. 11713;
Jacob Bush, Tiffany Apartments, 1 Maple Avenue, Patchogue, N.Y. 11772;
Ronald Bush, 46- Middle Road, Bayport, N.Y. 11705;
Louis A. Pfeifle, 175 Atlantic Avenue, Blue Point, N.Y. 11715;
Robert Rosenblatt, 57 So. Main Street, So. Hampton, N.Y. 11968.
SCHEDULE C
CERTIFICATE OF THE ASSESSOR OF THE TOW~ OF SOUTHOLD
3. That
property described
assessment roll of
4. That
STATE OF NEW YORK)ss .
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ''
I,~,%A~[~LOA ~ , a duly elected assessor of the Town
of Southold, Suffolk County, New York do hereby certify:
1. That I am a duly elected assessor of the Town of
Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and was one of the persons
responsible for the preparation of the assessment roll for the
year 198
2. That the real property described in paragraph 1 of
the annexed petition is situated in the said Town of Southold,
Suffolk County, New York, and is assessed on the tax roll of the
said Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, for the year 198~
which is the last preceding assessment roll of the said Town of
Southold, Suffolk County, New York.
the total assessed valuation of said real
in the said annexed petitiLn as shown on the
the said Town of Southold for [he year 198~, is
the petitioner, East End Associates, is the
owner of a majority in assessed valuation of the real proeprty
described in the said annexed petition which is now situated in
the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and which is
sought to be annexed to the Village of Greenport, Suffolk County,
New York and that the assessed valuation of the property as shown
on the assessment roll of the Town of Southold, for the year 198~,
is as follows:
(a) The real property assessed to East End Associates,
as described in the annexed petition is assessed at $ //~/ ~/~-e
Dated: Southold, New York
, 1984.
Assessor, Town of $outhold
Suffolk County, New York
RECEIVED BY
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
DATE Z//?//~y HOL[q~
DEPT.
TO~VN OF SOUTHOLD
EAF
ENVIR0;IHENTAL ASSESSMENT :'PART
Project Information
NOTICE: This document (. designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant
effect on the e)~v(rcqrnent. Please cor~lete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered
as Dart Of the a~plication for apbrOval and ,~y be subject to further verification and~ublic review. Provide
any additional infor~ltion you believe will be needed to comolete PARTS 2 and 3.
It is exoecteo coat cc~olotion of the F~RF will be dependent on information currently available and will not
involve new Studies, research or investiqation. If information requirino such additional work is unavai~ble.
so indicate and soecify each instance. ·
:~AME OF PROJECT:
EAST END ASSOCIATES
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION
NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If nifferent)
(Name)
AOORESS ANO NA~iE OF APPLICANT: (Street~
East End Associates
(hame) (P.O.)
20 Church Street BUSI~CSS PHONE:
(Street)
Patchogue, N.Y. 11772
(p.o.) (State) (Zip)
(State) (Zip}
Annexation of approximately
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (Briefly describe type of oroject or action)
q8.7 acres of land in the unincorporated portion of the Town of Southold into
the Incorporated Village of Greenport.
(PLEASE COHPLETE EACN QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if not applicable)
SITE DESCRIPTION
(Physical setting of overall project, both develoned and undeveloped areas) .
1. General character of the land: Generally uniform slope )~ Generally uneven and rolling or irregular
~. Present land use:
, Agriculture
3.
Uroan , Industrial , Coranercial , Suburban ., Rural ., Forest
, Other Lax)Ii7
Total acreage of oroject area:
Presently After Completion Presently After Completion
~.~acres JK~.~acres i'later Surface Area acres ___ac~s
._ acres acres Unvegetated (rock,
earth or fill) acres ~__acres
acres acres
Aooroxtmate acreage:
Meadow or Brushland
Forested
Agricultural
'letland (Freshwater or
Tidal ~s her Articles
~4, ~ or F.C.L.)
4. '4rat )s ~redominant soil type(s) on nroiect site?
5.~
Roads, buildings
and other ~aved
surfaces
Other (indicate tyne)
p_ __
O0 AYL~J ~,tOAA ('n ~eet)
LOAN~
C.
6. Approxinate percentage of proposed Project site with slooes: 0-1OS )~O ~; 1~-1~ ~ %; 15~ or
greater~%.
7. Is project contiguous to, or contain a buildinq or site listed on th~ National Register of Historic
Places? . Yes ._~__No '
B. What is the depth to the water table? ~..~)~feet
g. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? X Yes No
)0. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or
endangered - .Yes ~ :1o, according to -]dentify each species
11. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site?
12.
13.
14.
(i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological
fomations -_ Yes ~ No. (Describe
Is the project site presently used by the con~nunity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation
area - Yes ~ NO.
Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the co~m~unity?
Yes y. No
Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary ~//~
16.
16.
8.
Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
What is the dominant land use and zoning c)assificatton within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g.
single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. ~ story).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
h Physical di~nsions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor ~ ~-~ acres.
b. Project acreage developed: ~/A acres initially; ~ acres ultimately.
c. PmJect acreage to remain undeveloped ~/A
d. Length of project, in miles: ~/A (if a~propriate)
e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed:
age ~/A ; developed acreage ~/~ .
f. Nu~er of off-strut parking spaces existin~ ~
Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~/~
If residential: Number and type of housinq units:
One Family Two Family
Initial
Ultimate
t. If:
Con*ne rcial
Industrial
j.
Orientation
:leighborhood-City-~egional
building square foot-
; proposed (~) ·
(upon completion of project)
Multiple Family Condominium
Estimated Emoloyment
Total height of tallest nronosed structure -_~J~ ..feet.
-2-
How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed fr~ the site
2. C) tons
C~ cubic yards.
3. How many acres of veqetation {trees, Shrubs, ground covers) ~ill be re~ved from site - ~) acres.
4. Will any mature forest {over lO0 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed ~y
project? Yes ~ No
5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? Yes ~ ho
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction~/~ months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipated ~J/~ NO.
b. Anticipated date of cor~encement phase ~ month
demolition)
C. Approximate completion date finaT phase month
d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseouent phases?
8. Will blasting occur during construction? hy~ Yes No
g. Number of jobs generated: during construction )~Y~ ; after project is complete
lb. Number of jobs eliminated by this project
ll. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes ~ No. If yes, explain:
year (incluOlng
Yes No
12.
a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes )~ No.
b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.)
c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged
Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or
decreased by proposal? Yes )(. NO.
Is project or any portion of broject located in the lO0 year flood plain? Yes
13.
15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes X NO
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disQosal facility be used? Yes ___.No
¢. If yes, give name: : location
d. ~lill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal System or into a sanitary landfill? Yes
16. Will prnject use herbicides or pesticides? Yes )(. No
17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Ye~ ~ NO
18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local a~bience noise levels? Yes X
lg. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Yes ..~ No. If yes, indicate type(s)~
NO
gals/minute.
20. If water supply is from wells indicate Pumping capacity
21. Total anticinated water usage per day __I~//A qals/day.
22. Zoning: a. I-Ihat is dominant zoning classification of site?
b. Current speci¢ic zoning classification of site
c. !s proposed use. consistent ,vith present zon~nq?
If no. indicate desired zon,nq
AOTo A,t~ Ti c~ ~b',l
-3-
26.
C ¢
Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? Yes ~ No
b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing?
C. Local and Regional approvals:
Yes _ ~. Ho
Approval Required
{Yes, No) (Type)
Submittal Approval
(Date) (Date)
~ity, Town, Village Board
City, Town, Village Planning Board
City, Town, Zoning Board
City, County Health Department
Other local agencies
Other regional agencies
State Agencies
Federal Agencies
C. )NFOP~ATIONAL DETAILS
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any
adverse impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be
taken to mitigate or avoid them.
PREPARER'S SIGNATURE:
TITLE:
REPRESEHTING:
DATE:
-4-
EAF
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN~ - PART II
Project Impacts and Their Magnitude
General lnfn~-~ation {R~ed Carefully)
- In completing t~ form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations
been reasonaole? The reviewer is not expected to be an exoert environmental analyst.
- IdentiCying that an effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily
sionificant. Ar:v large effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. By identifying an
~f?ect in colu,~m'2 simply asks that it be looked at further.
- The Examoles provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the chreshnl
of magnitude that would trigger a response in Column 2. The examples are generally apolicable throughout the
State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds
may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating.
- Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as guidance
They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each ouestion.
- The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully)
a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Ye__~_s if there wi)) be any effect.
b. Mazbe answers should be considered as Ye._)%answers.
c. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the ootential
size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If
impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact ~ben consider the imeact as ootentially large and
o
proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than large
magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates, that such a reduction is not mossible.
1.
IMPACT ON LAND
NO YES
~ r£~AS GO
1.WILL THERE BE AN ~FF.~, A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE TO
PROJECT SITE?
Examoles that Would Aeoly to Column 2
Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, ils foot rise per
lO0 foot of lengt~), or where the general clones in the project
area exceed 10%.
Construction on Land where the denth to the water table is less
than 3 feet.
SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE
MODERATI LARGE REDUCED BY
IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE
C~nstruction on land where bedrock is exoosed or qeneral)y
within 3 feet of existing ground surface.
ConsSruction cna* will continue for more than 1 year Or involve
Excavation ?or m~n~ng purposes that would remove more than ),000
tons of natural material (i.e. rock Or SOil) per year.
Construction of any new sanitary landfill.
-5-
Construction in a designated floodway.
Other impacts:
--90 YES
WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL LANQ
FOUND ON THE SITE? (i.e. cltff~, dunes, oeoloqical
t$o~s, etc.) ' '
Specific land roms:
?PACT ON WATER
NO YES
3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER BODY OESIGNATEO AS ..... i....~ /
PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, gA, 25 of the Envtr- IlL) {
on~ental Conservation Law, E.C.L.)
\
E×amoles that Would Aoply to Column 2
~ Oredginq ~re than lOQ cubic yards of material From
channel of a protected stream.
~ Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal web)and.
Other impacts:
Examples that Would Apply to Column 2
A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body
of water or more than a l0 acre increase or decrease.
Construction of a body of water that exceeds l(1 acres of
surface area.
Other imnacts:
~0 YES
5. WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER nlALITY~ ~ ~
Examples that Hould Apply to Colu~ 2
-- Project will require a discharge permit.
-- Project requires use of a source of water that does not have
approval to serve proposed project.
-- Project requires water supply from we))s with greater
than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity.
~ Construction or operation causing any contamination
of a public water supply system.
-- Project will adversely affect groundwater.
-- Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to
facilities w~ich presently do not exist or have
inadequate capacity.
~ Project requiring a facility that would use water in
excess of 2P,QOO gallons per day.
__Project w~l) likely cause siltation or other discharge
Into an existing b:~y of water to the extent that there
wi)l be an obvious visual con,rase to natural conditions.
K)~K?ALL Tq POTENTIAL CAN I'tPACT BE
gERATE LARGE REDUCED BY
[HPA~T IMPACT PdOJECT CHAN~E
~S
S
!4ILL PROJECT ALTER DIIAINAGE FLOH, PATTEn!iS OR SIIRFpr. E !lATER NO YES
RUNOFF? ...................................................
ExamPle that '!ould APply to Column
Proiect would impede Flood water flows.
Prelect is likely to cause substantial erosion.
Project is incompatible with existing dratnape patterns.
IlO YES
PILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY, ...........................
Examples that I~ould ApPly to Column
Project will induce 1,Doe or more vehicle trips in any given
hour.
Project will result in the incineration of more than ) ton
Of refuse per hour.
Project emission rate of all contaminants will excre~ 5
lbs. oar hour or a heat source ~roducing more than lO
million BTU's per hour.
Other tmoacts:
I~PACT ON PLANTS AN~ A~[p,A~ 5
W[LL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR ENDANGERED SPECIES?
Exambles that Would Apoly to Colun~ 2
Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York
or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or
found on the site.
Removal of any oortion of a critical or siunificant wild-
life h~bi(~l~.
Ao~licatinn of Pesticide or he~ticid~ over more than
.'40 YES
®0
!(ILL PROJECT SUBSTA~ITIALLY AFFECT I!ON-THREATE:IED OR NO YES
ENDANr, ERED SPECIES? ....................................... Q 0
Exmmole that Wou)d Apply to Column ~
S,tALL TO PI1TENTIAL CMl IIIPACT BE
,SODE P~AT E LARGE REDUCEO 8Y
I~4PAGT I"PRC? PROJECT CHANGE
Project would substantially interfere with any resident
or m~§ratory fish or wildlife species.
-7-
;WALL TO mDTE~!TJAL CA:; Ii!PACT RE
IODERATE LARGE REDUCED ~Y
[~P~CT ['~P~CT PRQJECT CP~f~G
I,
0
IMPACT ON HI~TO~IC RESOURCES
ll. WILL PROJECT Ir~PACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC. NO YES
PRE-HISTOrIC OR PALEONTOG]CAL It~POPTANCE? ................. (~) 0
OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU!IITIES? ...... ~'~
13. ,'ILL THERE £E A!, EFFECT TO EXISTINC TRANSPORTATION NO YES
SYSTEUS? ............................................... GO
IWPACT ON ENERGY
14.
i;ILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO YES
ENERGY SUPPLY? ...........................................
Examples that Would Apply to Column 2
__ Project causing qreater than 5% increase in any form of
energy used in municipality.
Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 sinqle
or'two family residences.
__ Other impacts:
15.
IMPACT ON NOISE
WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, NOISE, GLARE, VIBP~TIQN NO YES
or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ....
Examoles that Would Aooly to Column 2 ~w~
Blasting within 1,SOO feet of a hospital, school or other
sensitive facility.
Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day).
Project will oroduce ooerating noise exceedinn the
local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
Other impacts:
16.
I~PACT ON HEALTH & HA~ARD~
HO YFS
['JILL PROJECT AFFEOT PUBLIC HEALTH ANO SAFETY? ............. ~/~--~
Examples that Would Apply to Column 2
Project will cause a risk of exglosion or release of hazardous
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)
in the event of accident or uoset conditions, or there will
he a chronic low level discharge or emission.
Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes"
{i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc., includino wastes that are solid, semi-so)id,
liquid or contain gases.)
Storaoe facilities for one million or more qallons of liauified
natural gas or other liouids.
Other imeacts:
SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT CE
'~DE~Ti LA~GE REDUCED BY
IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE
]S
)
IMPACT Oil GROWTH AND CHAP~CTER OF COM)IUNITY OR I(EIGMROR~OO~
17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHARACTER nF THE EXISTING
CO~h~JNITY? ..............................................
Examole that Would Apoly to Column
The population of the City. Town or Vtllage in which the
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5% oF
resident human population.
The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera-
ting services will increase by more than 5~ per year as a
result of this project.
Will involve any mermanent facility of a non-agricultural
use in an agricultural district or remove nrime agricultural
lands from cultivation.
The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities,
structures or areas of historic importance to the co~nunity.
Development will induce an influx of a particular age
group with special needs.
Project will set an important precedent for future proiects.
Project will relocate 15 or more employees in one or more
businesses.
Other imoaCtS:
18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT?
E~amoles that Would Apply to Column 2
Either government or citizens of adjacent communities
have expressed opposition or rejected the prelect or have
net been contacted.
Ob)ections to the nroiect from within the co?~nunity.
~)tALL % POTE;~TIAL £A~ iMPACT
IODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY
Il!PACT IIIPACT PROJECT CHAHGE
NO YES
NO YES
IIF ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS IDENTIFIED AS A )
POTENTIAL LARGE IMPACT Ok IF YOU CANNOT DETERMINE m
THE MAGNIllJDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. ~
PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT:
DETERMINATION PART I PART II PART 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts l, 2
and 3) and constderinq both the maonitude and imnortance of each
impact, it is reasonably determined that:
A. The project will result in no major impacts and, therefore,
is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment.
B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case
because the mitiQation measures described in PART 3 have been
included as part of the nroposed project.
C. The project will result in one or more ma~or adverse imbacts
that cannot be reduced and may cause siqnificant damage to
the environment.
Signature of Prenarer (if different from responsible officer)
PREPARE A NEAATIVE DECLARATION
C)
PREPARE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PREPARE POSITIVE DECLARATION PROCEED WITH EIS
Signature of R~sponsible 0fficia) in Lead
Agency
~'~'~nt or ty~e name of responsiole official
in Lead Agenc9
I:IFOR~AT IO~
EAF
EIIVIROI(MENTAL ASSESS)(ENT - PART III
EVALUATIO~ OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially laroe.
The amount of writino necessary to answer ~art 3 may be determined by answering the ouestion: In briefly
completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient information to indicate the
reasonableness of my decisions?
INSTRUCTIONS
Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
). Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than laroe imnact by a pro-
ject change. '
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this imnact is important
to the minicipality (city, town or village) in ~vhich the project is located. -
To answer the question of importance, consider:
The probability of the impact or effect occurring
The duration of the impact or effect
Its irreversibility, including pemnanently lost resources or values
Whether the impact or effect can be controlled
- The regional consequence of the impact or effect
Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
- Whether known objections to the project apol¥ to this impact or effect.
DETErmINATION OF SIG~IIFICA)tCE
An action is considered to be significant if:
One (or more) imoact is determined to both larne and its (their) conseouence, based on the review
above, is important.
PAPT III STATEMENTS
(Continue on Attachments, as needed)
NPORi
art
Gree~P .. Harbor .
JOHN A. COSTELLO
206 Wiggins Lane
Greenport, New York 11944
FEB 5
February 4, 1985
Planning Board
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Dear Sir s.'
I would like to request an informal meeting
of the Planning Board to discuss several items
in regard to the 48 acre parcel bordering on
Moore's Lane and County Route 48.
Several of the items which should be included
in this discussion would be the scope of the D.E.I.S.,
the possible densities, water and sewer, and also
the possibility of submitting a formal site plan
reducing the original commercial area and increasing
the residential area while the annexation process is
still under consideration.
If you would be willing to hold this
discussion, I would like to request it as
possible.
informal
SOOn as
Very truly yours,
ROAD a
(EXTENSION OF'WASHINGTON
AVENUE)
ROAD B (EXTENSION OF BENNET ROAD)
ROAD C
I
ROAD E
ROAD F
1
I $ ! John J. Raynor,
{~IVI L'ENGSNEER
· Water Mill, N,Y. 11976
1
ROAD D
PROFILES
ROAD AND DRAINAGE PLAN
FOR PROPERTY OF
JOHN COSTELLO
SITUATE
GREENPORT
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1'-50'
VERTICAL SCALE:
PREPARED: MAY 6, 1988
LOT AREAS
MIDDLE
~.-/~' r~- / /~ ~ OPEN
100 BUFFER
ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 48)
28' 20' E
1. 10,875 s.f. 38, 10,000 s.f.
2. 10,230 s.f. 39. 10,360 s.f.
3, 10,600 s.f. q0. 11,200 s.f,
q. 10,125 s.f. 01. 11,200 s.f.
5. 11,600 s.f. ~2. 11,q00 s.f.
6. 10,000 s.f. ~3. 12,350 s.f,
7. 10,000 s.f. q~. 10,000 s.f.
8. 10,000 s.f. ~5. 10,000 s.f.
9 10,000 s.f. ~6. 10,000 s.f.
10. 10,000 s.f. 07. 10,000
11. 10,000 s.f. ~8, 10,000 s.f.
12. 10,000 s.f. ~9. 10,050 s.f.
13. 10,000 s.f. 50. 12,150 s.f.
lq. 10,000 s.f. 51. 11,310 s.f.
15. 13,980 s.f. 52, 10,390
16. 10,070 s.f, 53. I0,000 s.f.
17. 10,000 s.f. 50. 10,000 s.f.
18. 10,000 s.f. 55, 10,000 s.f.
19. 10,090 s.f. 56. 10,000 s.f.
20. 10,000 s.f, 57. 10,000 s.f.
21. 11,190 s.f. 58. 10,790 s.f.
22. 12,600 s.f. 59, 13,700 s.f.
75. 10,300 s.f.
76. 10,730 s.f.
77. 35,79~ s,f,
78. Z6,750 s.f.
79. 76,~20 s.f.
80. ~5,180 s.f.
81. 25,280 s.f.
83. 26,720 s.f,
31,660 s.f.
85. 137,500 s.f.
670.00,
~ ~\ / ~ ' 23. 11,200 s.f. 60. 16,180 s.f.
parking ~ ~ ¢~ 20 DRAINAGE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 29, 10,000 s.f. 66, 10,200 s,f,
37, 10,000 s.f. ~, 10,550 s.f.
, ,,' ' !
TOTAL AREA: 48.718 acres
TOTAL NUMBER OF'LOTS: 85
' RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 76
~ INDUSTRIAL LO~S: 9
AREA OF OPEN SPACE: 11.4¢~RE'S~
AREA OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY: 6.64 ACRES
LINEAR FEET OF ROAD: 5,~41'
% :
~/ ~ ~ 5. BREAKDOWN OF ROAD LENGTH IS AS FOLLOWS:
RESIDENTIAL=4,59~'; INDUSTRIAL=770 ;BEYOND SITE
--. ~~ i; '" / e SKETCH PLAN
. . TOW. OF SOUTHOLD
~. .~ ~ ~.. ~ ~ SUFFOLK COU.TY, .EW YORK
A SURVEY BY VAN TUYL
OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY
OF THE FIVE EASTERN TOWNS.
(10,oo0 8F);
(EE,O~O-140,OOO SF),
BOUNDARIES=280~
John J. Raynor, P. E.
CIVIL ENGINEER
Water MdI,N Y. 11976
REVISED: APRIL I 2, 1985
REVISED: MARCH 6, 1985 (notes added)
PREPARED: MARCH 4, 1985
PRELIMINARY
ROAD , . (COUNTY ROAD 48)
."-'; ,Y..
MIDDLE ~,~ * "~"~ ~ * ' ' E~ST;NG ~E~ETATIO'.* ' ~ '' ~
LANDSCAPED BUFFER__ o ~
@
I
I
RECHARGE
AREA
(LOW POINT)
PAVEMENT WIDTH
¢ \ 50' R.O.W.
3UILDIN(
SIZE:
50'xlOO
/
8UILDABLE
AREA
BUILDING F-
s 74° 4E' oo: ~' -. .~
~..~, ~ANDSCAPED BUFFER
O
WASHINGTON AVENUE
670.00'
LOT AREAS
1 15,000 s.f. 30 13,300 s.f,
2 15,000 s.f. 31 13,000 s.f.
3 15,000 s.f. 32 1~,000 s.f.
4 16,300 s,f. 33 10,000 s.f.
6 15,500 s.f. 35 lO,000 s,f.
7 15,000 s.f. 36 10,000
8 12,000 s.f. 37 15,000 s.f.
9 10,000 s.f. 38 15,000 s.f.
11 10,000 s.f, 40 15,000 s.F.
12 10,000 s,f. 01 15,000 s.f.
13 10,000 s.f. 02 19,500 s.f.
10 12,000 s.f. 43 40,500 s.[.
16 16,000 s.f. 05 02,400 s.f.
17 16,000 s,f. 06 40,000 s.f.
18 16,400 s.f. [17 61,500 s.f.
19 15,000 s.f. 08 40,000 s.f.
20 15,000 s.f. 49 40,500 s.f.
21 15,000 s.f. 50 41,~00 s.f,
22 19,200 s.f. 51 02,000 s.f.
23 13,100 s.f. 52 40,000 s.f.
24 13,200 s.r. 53 6~,000 s.f,
25 14,900 s.f. 54 67,000 s.f.
27 10,900 s.f. 56 65,700 s.f.
28 1~,900 s,f. 57 67,000 s.f.
29 15,400 s,f. 58 200,57S s.f.
SITE DATA
TOTAL AREA: 48.718 ACRES
TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS: 58
RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 42
INDUSTRIAL LOTS, 16
AREA OF LOTS: 35.73~-ACRES
AREA OF RECHARGE AREA: 1.45'-ACRES
~.~ AREA OF OPEN SPACE: 7.66~ACRES
~-~_ AREA OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY: 3.87~ACRES
NOTES
1. BUILDING ENVELOPES AND LOT AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE,
2. BEARINGS AND DISTANCES WERE TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY VAN TUYL
AND SON, LICENSED LAND SURVEYORS, DATED MAY 7, 1970,
TOPOGRAPHIC DATA WAS TAKEN FROM SHEET HH-39 OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TOPOGRAHIC MAPS OF THE FIVE EASTERN TOWNS.
SKETCH PLAN
FOR PROPERTY OF
SITUATE
GREENPORT
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK, COUiTY, NEW YORK
CONTOUR INTERVAL: 5
SCALE: 1'=60'
0 60' 120' 180'
240"
PREUMINARY
Ie [ John J. Raynor, P. E.
REVISED: NOVEMBER 14, 1984
PREPARED: NOVEMBER 2, 1984