Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-25.-4-11.4 �1�Noft- M R SUBDIVISION Complete application received �,(J��/A7 Yield map received yl:zla 5 A lication reviewed at work session E OK _7�0./ �ot 4 �4UT�, Xro.t OK APP„Cantadvised of necessary revisions Revised submission received -1 oK nm t OK Sketchl approval nro. P Tow -with conditionsitions III IR19 _ � Lead Agency Coordination � p T-47/IT) SEQRA determination Z o Preliminary maps received n f ® Preliminary maps reviewed at work session AJL Ono OK 6 V ua t O -revisions iXro. OK W vRoad Profiles/drainage submitted K ,e roO °' A revisions vt Xro. OK Road profiles/drainage reviewed be Engineer OK z Z ° nza oK " Sent to County Planning Commission IV4 � iCi„ro.t OK N a Receipt of County Planning Report -L OK Review of SCPC report �--- O 4 13 y Preliminary hearing Cr Preliminary approval �PC Z -with conditions 1— Sent to Fire Commissioner 7 Receipt of firewell location —7"21-99 62s 99 1urp . o n Notification to applicant to include on final map Draft Covenants and Restrictions received C, veFAXTI ' Xro, OK ;b Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed £ n Filed Covenants and Restrictions received XLo OK � 5 Htj Frond estimate submitted Bond adopted by PB Bond adopted by TB ------__.__ Payment of bond Payment of inspection fee - I3etermination of park & Plat ound Park playground& la round fee adopted by TB fee Payment of park &playground fee Open Space documents Documents reviewed by TA ZOl I _ inro. OK Receipt of mylars and paper Prints with Health approval Final Public hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions ms ,1„1Ce Endorsement of subdivision APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . . . .Keith Mo.rton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber . A!935. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page . . .605. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On . . . .12./.2219.$. Liber . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : Liber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On . . . .. . . . . Liber . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . On . . . . . . . . . ,a .. . . . . .. . . ; 4tia Liber . . . . . .. . . . . . . .... .. . . . . . Page On MAY-25 199y as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . Sdutti61t1 Town or as distributee . .. . . .. . . . . .. ... . ... . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .Hanniag Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. The area of the land is . . , .1 7. .59. . . . . . .. . acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. The land is encumbered by . . . One . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . in original amount of $. .30.Or00Q . . unpaid amount $ , 300 ,000 held by Robert and Mary V- nR oq trand address Village La. Orient NY 11957, , . , . . , , . . . . .. J. . . . . e t r . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . .. . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . in original amount of . . . .. . . . . . . . . . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held by . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I .. .. .. .. . . . . . address . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . in original amount of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held by . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except . . None . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts . . . . .R-80 zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- N/A 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land Wgmv� (does not) fie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. 13. Water mains will be laid by . . . . . . N/A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . .. . . .N/A. . . . . . . . . . . . . i • • .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by . . . . .K/A. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the,plat shows proposed streets w hick are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $. . . .. .. . . . as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE . . . . . . I. t1.?,c . . . Q1/.'`. . . . ., 199`1. Keith. ,Morton.,. .Owner. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . (Name of Applicant) By (Signature and Title) 39 West 29th St. , 11th F1, New York, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I (Address) NY 10001 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . . . . . .. . . . . ., ss: On the . . . . . t.6. . . . . . . day of. . . . . .R. ?.t. Q. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19.E y. . ., before me personally came Keith Morton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged t t—. . . . . . . executed the same. . . . . . . . . . . . . c./. .(4 . .e. $Irs. . . . . . . . .. . . Notary Pu is MATT IAS S. IM Notary Public, State of New York No.01 1 M4654082 Qualified in Nassau County STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Commissim Expiggpkugust 31, 1991 On the . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . day . . . . . . . . . . . . of . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19. . . . . ., before me personally came . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . . . . . . . . . . . . resides at No. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . is the . .. . . . . . . . of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that . . . .. . . . . .. . knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that . . . . . . . . . . . . signed . .. . . .. . . . . . . . name thereto by like order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . Notary Public FORM 26/33-DPOA/S-97 Power of Attorney,Statutory Sltort Form,Revised 1/1/1997-(wigWidavit of Effectiveness a 1994 Fidelity National Tidc huurattcegdkany of New York) CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE!WING THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT SIWD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY DURABLE GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY NEW YORK STATUTORY SHORT FORM THE POWERS YOU GRANT BELOW CONTINUE TO BE EFFECTIVE SHOULD YOU BECOME DISABLED OR INCOMPETENT (CAUTION: THIS IS AN IMPORTANT DOCUMENT. IT GIVES THE PERSON WHOM YOU DESIGNATE (YOUR"AGENT")BROAD POWERS TO HANDLE YOUR PROPERTY DURING YOUR LIFETIME,WHICH MAY INCLUDE POWERS TO MORTGAGE, SELL, OR OTHERWISE DISPOSE OF ANY REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY WITHOUT ADVANCE NOTICE TO YOU OR APPROVAL BY YOU. THESE POWERS WILL CONTINUE TO EXIST EVEN AFTER YOU BECOME DISABLED OR INCOMPETENT. THESE POWERS ARE EXPLAINED MORE FULLY IN NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW, ARTICLE 5, TITLE 15, SECTION 5-1502A THROUGH 5-1503 WHICH EXPRESSLY PERMIT THE USE OF ANY OTHER OR DIFFERENT FORM OF POWER OF ATTORNEY. THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT AUTHORIZE ANYONE TO MAKE MEDICAL OR OTHER HEALTH CARE DECISIONS. YOU MAY EXECUTE A HEALTH CARE PROXY TO DO THIS. IF THERE IS ANYTHING ABOUT THIS FORM THAT YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND, YOU SHOULD ASK A LAWYER TO EXPLAIN IT TO YOU.) THIS is intended to constitute a DURABLE GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY pursuant to Article 5, Title 15 of the New York General Obligations Law: I, . . RE.ITH.SCOTT .NORTON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . residing at.25. 8.. .86th... -St.• New York, NY • IG028• (insert your name and address) do hereby appoint: -ROBERT- - •S, •HUGHES. . . • . . . residing at .1025• Pete ea• HI-1-1 -Rd: Or,ieat•,• MY • • 11957 (If I person is to be appointed agent, insert the name and address of your agent above) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . residing at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . residing at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . residing at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (If 2 or more persons are to be appointed agents by you insert their names and addresses above) my attomey(s)-in-fact TO ACT (If more than one agent is designated, CHOOSE ONE of the following two choices by putting your initials in ONE of the blank spaces to the left of your choice:) ( ) Each agent may SEPARATELY act. ( ) All agents must act TOGETHER. (If neither blank space is initialed, the agents will be required to act TOGETHER) IN MY NAME,PLACE AND STEAD in any way which I myself could do, if I were personally present, with respect to the following matters as each of them is defined in Title 15 of Article 5 of the New York General Obligations Law to the extent that I am permitted by law to act through an agent: (DIRECTIONS: Initial in the blank space to the left of your choice any one or more of the following lettered subdivisions as to which you WANT to give your agent authority. If the blank space to the left of any particular lettered subdivision is NOT initialed,NO AUTHORITY WELL BE GRANTED for matters that are included in that subdivision. Alternativq,the letter corresponding to each power you wish to grant may be written or typed on the blank line in subdivision '(Q)", and you may then put your Initials in the blank space to the left of subdivision "(Q)" in order to grant each of the powers so indicated) ( ) (A) real estate transactions; ( ) (M) making gifts to my spouse, children and more ( ) (B) chattel and goods transactions; remote descendants, and parents, not to exceed in ( ) (C) bond, share and commodity transactions; the aggregate $10,000 to each of such persons in ( ) (D) banking transactions; any year; ( ) (E) business operating transactions; ( ) (N) tax matters; ( ) (F) insurance transactions; ( ) (0) all other matters; ( ) (G) estate transactions; ( ) (P) full and unqualified authority to my ( ) (H) claims and litigation; attorney(s)-in-fact to delegate any-or all of the ( ) (1) personal relationships and affairs; foregoing powers to any person or persons whom ( ) (.n benefits from military service; my attorney(s)-in-fact shall select; ( ) (K) records, reports and statements; 0A) (Q) each of the above matters identified by the ( ) (L) retirement benefit transactions; following letters: g,D,E.,F-,-K;C. . . . . . . . . . (Special provisions and limitations may be included in the statutory short form durable power of attorney only if they conform to the requirements of section 5-1503 of the New York General Obligatt'ons Law. This •power. .of .att orney. is .ipt>'�►. ed• t. . . . . . . . . . . ..be. limited to those m tters which directly relate. to. .the.purchase. and .depe.l,opmeat ,of• the .VanNostrand . .... ;ia . . . .eat,. NY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Special Additional Provision: The powers granted under (A) through (C) above shall include the sale of a cooperative housing unit and are enlarged so that all fixtures and articles of personal property which at the time of such transaction are or which may thereafter be attached to or used in connection with the real or personal property may be included in the agreements or other instruments to be executed and delivered in connection with any transactions and which may be described in said instruments with more particularity. This Power of Attorney is not subject to question because an instrument executed hereunder fails to recite or recites only nominal consideration pard therefore and any person dealing with the subject matter of such instrument may do so as if full consideration had been expressed therein. This durable power of attorney shall not be affected by my subsequent disability or incompetence. If every agent named above is unable or unwilling to serve, I appoint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . residing at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (insert name and address of successor) to be my agent for all purposes hereunder. TO INDUCE ANY THIRD PARTY TO ACT HEREUNDER, I HEREBY AGREE THAT ANY THIRD PARTY RECEIVING A DULY EXECUTED COPY OR FACSUvM E OF THIS INSTRUMENT MAY ACT HEREUNDER, AND THAT REVOCATION OR TERMINATION HEREOF SHALL BE INEFFECTIVE AS TO SUCH THIRD PARTY UNLESS AND UNTIL ACTUAL NOTICE OR KNOWLEDGE OF SUCH REVOCATION OR TERMINATION SHALL HAVE BEEN RECEIVED BY SUCH THIRD PARTY,AND I FOR MYSELF AND FOR MY HEIRS,EXECUTORS,LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES AND ASSIGNS, HEREBY AGREE TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLDT S AGAIN MAY ARISE AGAINANY SUCH THIRD PARTY FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS THAT ST SUCH THIRD PARTY BY REASON OF SUCH THIRD PARTY HAVING RELIED ON THE PROVISIONS OF THIS INSTRUMENT. THIS DURABLE GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY MAY BE REVOKED BY ME AT ANY TIME, IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto signed my name this . day of. . .A.- (YOU SIGN HERE:) —► , .�j /�' • The statute ragvlrsa that this Instrument be acknowledged by the print/po oIup�ra p>C s on/rla ma a or proof 8y auI rcrl)-binrg wlMeaa. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF }SS.: STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF Ajer / o kK }SS.: On the day of 19 before me On the 16$k day of 19 gQ ,before me personally came personally came to me(mown to be the individual described in and who executed the to me(mown to be th!and Lualdescri in andwho executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same. foregoing instrumentdg he executed the same. `� -k74-A MATTH S S. IM Nry Public,State of New York No. 011M4654082 Qualified in Nassau County Commission Expires Aug.31, 1999 AFFIDAVIT OF EFFEci7mvESB° STATE OF NEW YORK.CouA77 OF )SS.. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . residing at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . being duly sworn does depose and say that I am the Attorney-in-Fact under the above Power ofAttorney. That said Power ofAttorney is a valid and subsisting Power which has not been revoked by the death of the principal(s)or otherwise; that I have no actual knowledge of revocation of theforegoing Power;and,I warrant and represent that I have full and ungualifled authority to execute%a �his* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (peed,Mortgage, etc.] knowing that . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , will rely upon the representations made herein as Inducement to accept such instrumentsPower ofAttorney as evidence ofmy authority to act. SWORNAND SUBSCRIBED To BEFORE ME 7MS DAYOF -- • . . • • . . • . ' • . . ' . . . . . ' . . • • • l9 - . . . .Attorney in Fact .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .(Notorl'.AO'art,SeamPat Right). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mira4tit f tains olveT11fAf'Druq DISTRICT REVISED SrATmORY SHORT FORM SECTION TITLE No. BLOCK IAT - COUNTY OR TOWN TO RECORDED ATWE REQUEST OF Fidelity National Title Insurance Company of New York RR7ORNBrMAa,To. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NY I, O'a Fidelity.9�,raap Member New York State Lend Title Association W co W O LL LL 0 Z D C W , O LL O W V) W K APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURR FOAM The Town of Sou tliold's Code of Ethics prohibits conllic Ls of interest on the arl; of town off cera and em to see. 7'I;e Purpose of Chia form 1s to provide information which can alert the town of oeaible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action isnecessary CO avoid same YOUR NAMR: 2 Tot-) I ll\ & 1 7 H S Gv lI i _ (Last name, iret name, middle initial, unless you are applying in tile name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name. ) NATURE OF APPLICATIONS (('heck all that apply. ) Tax grievance Variance Change of zone Approval of plat Exemption from plat or orflclat map Other (If "Other, " name the activity. ) DO you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, Parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? 'Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business Interest" mean, a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the ,hare,. YES NO If you answered •YES, dwh " complete the balance of this form and ate and sign ere indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the a and the town officer or employee. Either check thelicant) appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe In the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply) t A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporation)) 6) the legal or beneficial owner or any interest in a noncorporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an officer, director, partner, or employee or the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSIIIP Submitted t da /J,p�l,',1`i Signature- "�v �� 19� Si �p� `(/L/✓�'fl 0�///✓ Print 11,111. /( d(./iLf //G / / /� S l/(rle✓'71j COj% AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP State of . .V} w Grr/ //��. . ) County of . la�i,./ '7.F �• • • ) ss : Keith Scott Morton, being duly sworn deposes and says that : a) he is the sole owner of a parcel of land in Orient, New York which is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Map as #1000-25-4-11.4 . b) he is proposing to subdivide the subject parcel . c) he has authorized Robert S . Hughes, Attorney at Law to represent his interests before the various regulatory boards of the Town of Southold. e Ej� KEIT SCOTT MORTON 25 EAST 86TH STREET, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10028 Subscribed and sworn to beforg this day of 1999 i NOTARY PUBLIC CHRISTINE C.ANDERSON Notar y Pu 3ate o(Naw York No..3141483SB48 Qualified in New Yor;<Cou �. Cammission Ex,ires June 55,i --$bb 14 1G-2 (2187)-7c • • 617.21 SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is riot always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable- It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of file environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action- full EAF Components: The full FAI is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists it reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact the form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: I 1 Part 1 Fl Part 2 1]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impacts) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Cl B. Although the project could have a significant effect ori file environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because file mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted ETllure` 1U 12Cf/Ar1C� � QcZ'� ��'l�-Kr / _ prf Kai tb Srntt Mnrtn__�n_1 __U__- Name of Action -- Name of tearl Agency--- —..-- Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Eead Agency Iitle of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Fead Agency Signat Lire of Preparer(II different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATIN Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICF 1 his document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification doll public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAI will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION orrhard Acres LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Munlclpallly and County) King Street/Old Farm Road/Orchard Street____S_outhold. Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE _Suffolk Environmental Con�ultina . Inc. (A�cen�_.-____ (5161 537-5160 ADDRESS X 2003 CITY/POSTATE ZIP CODE Brid eham ton NY 11932 NAME OF OWNER(]I dillerent) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Keith Scott Morton _.(212)_889-6643 ADDRESS Last 79th _t- - -- CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE New York NY 10001 _ DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivide 17 . 59 acres into 4 residential parcels including agricultural reserve area . Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and Undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ClUrban I llnduslrial ❑Cornmercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest WAgriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: _ 17 . 59 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or 8rushland (Non agricultural) _ _ acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 11. 55 _ acres 17 . 43 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area _ acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces __0_4—_ acres h _ 1 6 acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Haven loam a. Soil drainage: ■Well drained 100 % of site I-)Moderately well drained % of site []Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? --1-7_,_5_9acres (See 1 NYCRR 370). *inclusive of proposed 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [Ayes ■No common driveways a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 S Approximate percentage of propose�oject site with slopes: ■0-10% —� _ °� (]10-1540 _ 4b L115% or greater _— % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain it building, site, or district, listed on the Slate or the National Registers of Historic Places? Eyes LINO 7 Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Eyes l_]No U What is the depth of the water table? _1A_5_ (in feel) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Eyes I.1No 10 Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? CIYes MNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life [ha( is identified as threatened or endangered? L lYes ENO According to _BSnc-a A Andar-son — Identify each species _ - 12, Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i e., cliffs, clunes, other geological formations) []Yes ENO Describe ___—_— ---- -- 13. Is the project site presently used by the connnuni[y or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Ilyes ■No If yes, explain ----__----- -- 14 Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Eyes I INo 15. Streams within or conliguous to project area: —_NDne------------- --- a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary _— - — ----- 16. lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or conliguous to project area. a. Name Nnna __.-- —_— _--- b. Size (IF) a(res) - 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑Yes ONo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? 1_IYes 1 ]No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes [-,]No 10. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25 AA, Section 303 and 304? Eyes PJNo 19 Is the site located in or substantially conliguous to a Critical [nvironmenlal Area designated pursuant to Article 11 of the FCI_, and 6 NYCRR 617? (lyes ■NOI, 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I ]Yes ■No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 17.x$__4--- acres. b Project acreage to be developed: —7_4acres initially; __7_A__— acres ultimately c Project acreage to remain undeveloped _-9__19_-_ acres. *inclusive of existing cl Length of project, in miles (If appropriate) structures and common driveways . Not inclusive of max. coverage e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed _ 9 ; as per zoning. I- Number of off-street parking spaces existing i1/A —; proposed -7J-A— g Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour _R (upon completion of project)? It If residential: Number and type of housing units. One Family Iwo I amily Multiple I`amily Condominium Initially --- -- - -- Ultimately --- — i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure N/A height width; length j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 721— ft. 3 2. I low much natural material (i a, rock, earth, (,tc.) will be removed from the site? 0 _ tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas lie reclaimed? ■Yes [ INo I.IN/A with a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? Landscaping tialbuse h. Will topsoil be stockpile d for reclamation? ■Yes 17No C' Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I.)Yes NINo 4. Now many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 17 . 59 acres ;. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes ENO *anticipate residential development and coritipugdd fa�mi�[� 6. If single phase project Anticipated period of construction —1 — montes, nx a ing (emo i on). 7 If multi phased N/A a- Total number of phases anticipated —._ (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 -- month _ year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase _ — month year- d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes []No It Will blasting occur during construction? []yes ENO 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction �_ after project is complete .-- 10- Number of jobs eliminated by this project ._ 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [_IYes ANo If yes, explain — 12- Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [ ]Yes KNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount — h. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged eventual se tic system to 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? lyes ❑No Type serve_ rest enees 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? []yes MNo Explain — — 1.5- Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes ■No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? LIYcs ■No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I_IYcs UNo c. If yes, Rive name _. — location _ d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ❑No C. If Yes, explain — —..----- -- -- 17 Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes MNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? _ — tonslmonth- b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18 Will project use horbicides or pesticides? ■Yes ❑No 19 Will project routinely produce odors (more [hall one hour per day)? ❑Yes ENo 20 Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes RNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? 6GYe5 LINo If yes , indicate typeWelectric/oil typical of residential use (eventually) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 3o gallons)minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day —36Do gallons/day, 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Uy-pe5 ONO ^� �PsrP1 np t rights If Yes, explain No fundinq foT_Subdi .� rlG y+-- possible in future 25. Approvals Required: submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board IlYes ❑No _--_ City, Town. Village Planning Board ■Yes IINo Subdivision_ 4/99 City, Town Zoning Board I]Yes [ 1No _ City, County Health Department ■Yes CINo _Subdivision_ 5/99 Other Local Agrncies I ]Yes L )No Other Regional Agencies I )Yes I_]No Slate Agencies I]Yes I INo _ Federal Agencies I )Yes I]No C. Zoning and Planning Information l Does proposer) action involve a planning or zoning decision? Eyes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: I_lzoning amendment I l7oning variance I_Ispecial use permit 1XIsubdivi5i0n ❑site plan I Inew/revision of master plan Lhesource management plan Uother _ 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? _ R-80 (Residential) 3- What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 8 residential parcels _ 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? Reduced density proposed ( 4 lots) 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 4 residential parcels (no further subdivision) G Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Eyes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land uses) and Toning classifications within a Y mile radius of propoeff lion? Residential (R-40 & R-80 ) Pre-existing non-conforming resident>_a parcels dominant _ ti. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1A mile? Byes ❑No 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how nnany lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimurn lot size proposed? 1 . 1 . acre 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes ENO 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fi-e prolectic n)? Eyes ❑No a If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Eyes UNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ■No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to )fie best of my knowledge. A phcant/S sor Nana ]3ru e A. Anderson, Suff . Environmental t I -- --__ -__ ------_-- -. Date __7,L 1 319 9 Sign to -- _ title Agent If the �ismoastal Area, and you are a slate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. cam:.�+�:�dr1.Wd.rY►CwrrtyirtG,wV'Mr.Larw�r 'lc�++ir4�� CON$uLT YOUR LAWYORMFORE NOrarta T""M"ONr-THIS INSTRUMOff SHOULD Oa U8W OY LAWYER$ ONLY. THIS INDENTURE,made the day of December,nineteen hundred and ninety-eight BETWEEN ROBERT VANNOSTRAND gad MARY VAN NOSTRAND,husband and wire,both residing at(Not)Village Lane,Orient,Now York 11957 party of the&A part,and KErM SCOTT MORTON,mkiing at 25 East 86°Street, Apt, 12G,New York,New York 1002E party of the second part, WITNESSETH,that the Party of the'first purt in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second pat, does hereby gram and release unto the party of the second part,the heirs or somessers and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL TEAT CERTAIN plot, piece or p&Md of land, situate, lying and bring at Orient, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEG24NIKO at a monument set at the intersection of the northerly line of King Sb W and the easterly line of Old Farm Road and from said pant of beginning running along said northerly line of King Street, North g0 degrees 52 minutes 40 seconds West, 346.57 feet to land now or formerly of(lemma; RUNNING THENCE along said lands now or fonnerly of Gemma the following two courses and distances: (1)Nath 05 degrees 42 minutes 30 seconds West, 135.52 feet; (2) North 81 degrees 02 minutes West, 162.17 feet to lands now or formerly of King; RUNNING THENCE along said land now or formerly of King and then lands of others, North 07 degrees 33 minutes 30 seconds West, 853.00 feet to lands now or formerly of Saint; RUNNING THENCE along said lands now or formerly of Saint, North 83 degrees 50 minutes Fast, 74.68 feet to lands now or formerly of Van Nostrand; RUNNING THENCE along said lands now or formerly Of Van Nostrand, South 87 degrees 49 n minutesW ands sow or formerly of Tabor; QNJ �sT' Z,0,0 Ae'r -WNNING THENCE along said lands now or formerly of Tabor the following three courses and distances; (1) South 02 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds East, 11.60 feet; (2) South 89 degrees 42 minutes 20 seconds East, 105.11 feet; (3) North 02 degrees 19 minutes 20 seconds West, 166.40 feet to the southerly line of Orchard Street; RUNNING THENCE aloag said southerly line of Orchard Street, North 87 degrees 40 minutes 40 seconds East, 50.00 feet to lands now or formerly of Bogden; RUNNING THENCE along said lands now or formerly of Bogden, South 02 degrees 19 minutes 20 wands East, 200.00 fat; RUNNING THENCE along said lands now or formerly of Bogden and then along lands now or formerly of Boerum, North 87 degrees 40 minutes 40 seconds East, 300.00 feet; �N RUNNING THENCE along lands now or formerly of Boerum, North 86 degrees 55 minutes 10 seconds Easttto lands now or formerly of Nigro; r,�f11� 17,6,4/ fo• �UNNING TMWCB along said lands now or formerly of Nigro, North 76 degrees 50 minutes 40 seconds East, 69.0 feet to lands now or formerly of Lemer; RUNNING THENCE along said lands now or formerly of Le=er, the following two courses and distances: (1) South 11 degrees 56 minutes 10 seconds West, 86.73 feet; (2) South 65 degrees 42 minutes 20 seconds Fast, 143.64 feet to lands designated as park on a certain map entitled, "Bayview Farm at Orient" filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as Map No. 7045; RUNNING THENCE along said lands designated as park on a certain trap entitled, "Bayview Farm at Orient" filed In the Suffolk County Clerk's Office as Map No. 7045, South 13 degrees 34 minutes 30 seconds West, 657.22 fat to the easterly line of Old Farm Road; RUNNING THENCE along said easterly line of Old Farm Road, South 33 degrees 07 minutes 20 seconds West, 325.00 feet to the point of BEGINNING. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE part of the same premises conveyed to the party of the first part by deed from William Lama and Eileen Lenzner, his wife, dated 4/26177 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on 515/77 in Liber 8230 cp 336. T'OG'ETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and tights of the party of the fust part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the patty of the second Part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the patty of the second part forever, AND the party of the first part ooveaants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid, AND the Party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Li(st Law, covenants that the Party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such considerating as a trust fund to be applied fust for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will ePPlY the Larne first to the payment of the cost of the improvement befoe using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word 4pairty, shall be construed as if it read *Parties'wherever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the poly of the fust part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written, r+rnuasNw a ROBERT VAN NOST'RANp MARY VAN TOSTRANL STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) as: On the //4' day of December, 1998, before me personally came ROBERT VAN NOSTRAM and MARY VAN NOSTRAND to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they executed the same. Gc '— VWL IAM ING.Ys 4aN�.t uffaft sw*11C MON"PaprVW Cow ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE,TOWN CLERK RECEIPT 074116 Town of Southold % Southold, New York 11971 Ph 516-765-1800 DATE_. Gy cyq RECEIVED OF: $_ FOR: ❑CASH --- K 110 BY: ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE,TOWN CLERK REC IPT 074748 Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Phon �516-765-1800 DATE � �—19� REJEIVED OF: $ FOR: e (.7 ❑ CASH 9.0<CK--# 1(0 36 BY: 03/17/2005 i0:53 6313699090 • CHARLES R.CUDDY Attorney at Law 445 Gritting Avenue Riverhead,New York 11901 Tel No.: (631)369-8200 Fax No.: (631)369-9060 TO: Anthony Trezza.Planning Department Fax#: 765-3136 TELECOPIER COVER SHEET Total Number of Pages—I including cover sheet if transmission is faulty or incomplete, please inform us as soon as possible. Operator: Iwoua Date: March 17, 2005 Comments: Re: Keith Scott Morton Subdivision map "Orchard Street Farm" SCTM#1000-25-4-11.6 Please advise if you have reviewed the map for Keith Scott Morton with reference to a 80/60 subdivision. I believe the 15.5-acre parcel with three (3) building sites of 1 acre will meet the requirements. Please advise so we may complete the map and submit a formal application. Charles R. Cuddy 7hie/hr lrwwWNaion mvether with matenods fedtowirtf ere immaded fim the person or perxem named hereon and are cotuidered eo dendah lnfiwrnalion. If you hove mvived this banrwushar in error,you are&reded to reewn these malerioy jmu iaudy Dy rquior mail to the sender at the above address. Nwade burwred for the rdam will be paid by this flim, co • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNTNO BOARD MEMBF,RS � , . G. , P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 ChairIS y OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex WILLIAM L .EDWARDS J.CREMERS ��.( �a� 54375 State Route 25 KENN (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold,NY GEORGE D. SOLOMON Telephone: 631765-1938 Fax: 631765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 15, 2005 Charles Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Proposed Subdivision for Orchard Street Farms Located on the n/w corner of King Street and Old Farm Road and the south side of Orchard Street in Orient SCTM#1000-25-4-11.4 Zoning District: R-80 Dear Mr. Cuddy: The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, February 14, 2005, %adopted the following resolutions: WHER'=AS, this proposed minor subdivision is for 4 lots on 17.59 acres; and WHEREAS, on August 24, 2004, the Town of Southold Town Board adopted Local Law No. 18, 2004 "A Local Law in relation to a new Chapter A106 — Subdivision of Land of the Code of the Town of Southold"; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that pursuant to the new Chapter All 06, the Planning Board classifies this application as a Standard Subdivision; and be it further RESOLVED, that the application must be revised and re-submitted to conform with Chapter A106 — Subdivision of Land of the Code of the Town of Southold". Upon written request, the Planning Board may credit application fees previously paid to the Town of Southold. The determination will be based upon the amount of work that has been accomplished to date on the application. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, enlyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 0 BENNETT Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chaairirmmanan KI,JR. _� Gyp P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS VD Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS �y • �� Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax(631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 14, 2001 Charles R. Cuddy, Esq. P.O. Box 1547 445 Griffing Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Orchard Acres (a.k.a. Keith Scott Morton) SCTM#1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Cuddy: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 13, 2001: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a retroactive six month extension of sketch plan approval from July 19, 2001 to January 19, 2002. Sketch plan approval was granted on July 19, 1999. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Py Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman r 0 ✓� CHARLES R.CUllllY ' ATTORNEY A'1' LAW 445GRIFFING A\'ENL'E RI VERHEAD,NEW YORK NIAnIg_A ddre: TEL: (631)369-8Z(' xl P.O. tl,,x 1547 FAX: (631)30-9W Riverh A, NY 11901 E-mail: crcuddy(aeartlilinlZmet July 9, 2001 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY l 1971 Re: Keith Scott Morton - Orient Subdivision Application Dear Planning Board Members: As indicated to you, I represent Keith Scott Morton in connection with the proposed subdivision of his parcel in Orient. We discussed the question of development rights and the value placed upon those rights by the County. I have been making an effort to increase the value paid for development rights and have been working with James Burke at the Suffolk County Office of Real Property. Since we are working to achieve the development of this site, based upon the plan presented to you, I respectfully request that you grant an extension of at least 90 days to permit us to complete the subdivision process. Very truly yours, 7 ' . e Charles R. Cuddy CRC:cg AL 10 2WI SoutholdTown Planning Board Pa CHARLES R.CUDDY Cq ATTORNEY AT LAW {�S 445 GRI FFI NG AV E NL'E RIVERHEAD,NEW YORE: Mailing Address_: TEL: (631)369-82(A) P.O. Box 1547 FAX: (631)369-9080 Rive,bead, NY 11901 E-mail: crcuddy0fearthlinlx.net March 14, 2001 P Southold Town Planning Board Main Road P.O. Box 1179 MAR 15 2001 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Kelly Scott Morton - Orient Subdivision Application ij_1`110i(x o" Dear Planning Board Members: Please note in your records that I will be appearing on behalf of Kelly Scott Morton in connection with the proposed subdivision of his parcel at Orchard Acres, Orient. Would you please forward any notices regarding meetings or further requirements in connection with the subdivision to me at the above address. Thank you. Very truly yours, Charles R_ Cuddy Enclosures CRC:cg ROBERT S. HUGHES Gi Attorney at Law 316 Front Street Telephone(631) 477-2700 P.®. Box 128 Fax(631) 477-09.55 Greenport; New York 11944 E Mail rlrulics4�a� taraYine.net March 14, 2001 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 !4 :r RE: KEITH SCOTT MORTON/ORCHARD ACRES W is 2 I SUBDIVISION APPLICATION SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Chairman Orlowski, The purpose of this letter is to inform you that this office no longer represents Mr. Morton with regards to the above-referenced application. All further correspondence should be addressed to Mr. Morton at 25 East 86' Street, NY, NY 10028. Thank you for your attention. gert C'. Hughes I - cc Mr. Morton PLANNING BOARD MEMBE DOFF04 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. 0� Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 QG Chairman /�� W-1 P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDSCOD T Telephone (631) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax (631) 765-3136 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 9, 2001 Robert S. Hughes, Esq. P.O. Box 128 316 Front Street Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Orchard Acres (a.k.a. Keith Scott Morton) SCTM#1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Hughes: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 8, 2001: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch plan approval from January 19, 2001 to July 19, 2001. Sketch plan approval was granted on July 19, 1999. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, �' "pMO, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ROBERT S. HUGHES c Attorney at Law 316 Front Street Telephone(631) 477-2700 P 0. Box 128 Fax(631) 477-0955 Greenport, New York 11944 EMaiPrltu�Pres4(a1�[sra3lia�e.aiet December 21, 2000 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 RE: KEITH SCOTT MORTON/ORCHARD ACRES SUBDIVISION APPLICATION SCTM # 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Chairman Orlowski, The purpose of this letter is to request the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of the time required to submit final maps for the above referenced application. We have filed all required paperwork with the Health Department but have yet to receive approvals. In addition, negotiations with Suffolk County regarding the sale of Development Rights are ongoing. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. S' ce7ely, , I '/ Robert S. Hu ROBERT S. HUGHES 5 Attorney at Law 316 Front Stmt Telephone(631) 477-2700 F.0 Box 128 Fax(631) 477-0955 Greenport, New York 11944 EMail rPru�li�s4:�tonllne.ne[ July 6, 2000 Ms. Melissa Spiro Senior Planner Southold Town Planning Department Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 RE: KEITH SCOTT MORTON/ORCHARD ACRES SUBDIVISION APPLICATION SCTM # 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Melissa, The purpose of this letter is to request the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of the time required to submit final maps for the above referenced application. We are still in the process of obtaining Health Department approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. S' erely R es JUL 0 7 2000 PLANNING BOARD MEMBEr• SpFFO(,� • BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. - 0�� CD Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairman P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS p < Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L. EDWARDS h Z Fax (631) 765-3136 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. O Telephone (631) 765-1938 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 1, 2000 Robert S. Hughes, Esq. P.O. Box 128 316 Front Street Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Orchard Acres (a.k.a. Keith Scott Morton) SCTM#1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Hughes: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 31, 2000: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch plan approval from July 19, 2000 to January 19, 2001. Sketch plan approval was granted on July 19, 1999. Please note that this is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, 1 6i�'Kki t�L- Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman '^� R• aVYTf� f �ILLdOF .� a It 11lot 4 C • - t Y Y r 01 MOT 1009 �,`r .a •5 a� Y e• cwfm' -Y UMa� .• � �• -Y 1 to < e0Y � • ' t • ( 1 [d t 4. O t R , F 1 i J Y dWo r ' r r I SNA `� I PLANNING BOARD MEMBF0 %� s FFO �, ' BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ��� C Town Hall, 53095 State Route 'l5 Chairman �� �G P.O. Box 1179 arc Southold, New York 11971-0959 WILLIAM J. CREMERS n h KENNETH L. EDWARDS Z Fax (631) 765-3136 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. � O `F Telephone (631) 765-1938 RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 2, 2000 Robert S. Hughes, Esq. P.O. Box 128 316 Front Street Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Orchard Acres (a.k.a. Keith Scott Morton) SCTM#1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Hughes: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 1, 2000: WHEREAS,the Planning Board initiated the SEQRA lead agency coordination process on July 19, 1999; and WHEREAS, the process was put on hold at the applicant's request while the applicant negotiated with the County in regard to the purchase of development rights; and WHEREAS, in a letter dated April 6, 2000, Bruce Anderson, on behalf of the applicant, asked the Planning Board to complete the SEQRA review; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non- significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. i S Chairman enc. cc: Bruce Anderson NEAN, POPE & VOORHIS,1PLC ENVIRONMENTAL, PLANNING, CONSULTING (516)427-5665 572 Walt Whitman Road FAX(516)427-5620 Melville,NY 11747 TO: Melissa Sprio Date: 28-Apr-00 Town of Southold Planning Department Re: Orchard Acres g Orient Town Hall, 53095 NYS Rte. 25 NP&V 400112 PO Box 1179 Your Ref: SCTM 1000-25-04-11.4 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Gentlemen: We are sending you XX Under separate cover XX Herewith Pick Up By Messenger For Your Review& Comment Approval XX As requested XX For your use Bid Submission Quantity Drawing Title Sheet No. Rev. No. 1 Environmental and planning review 1 Part I EAF-reviewed 1 Part II EAF Remarks: Please feel free to call should you have any questions.'' MAY — 1 2000 Board Very truly yours, NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS,LLC d NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING CONSULTING By; Shana M. Lacey Orchard Acres @ Orient EAF Part I Review NP&V#00112 mil ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS ORCHARD ACRES* ORIENT Prepared for: Melissa Spiro Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971-0959 Prepared by: Nelson,Pope&Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville,New York 11747 Date: April 27,2000 The Town of Southold Planning Board has retained Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) for consulting services in review of the above referenced subdivision. As currently proposed, the application involves the subdivision of an approximately 17.59 acre parcel into 4 residential lots and two associated common driveways. The site currently contains three structures including a small barn, shed and greenhouse, with vegetated areas consist of cultivated agricultural fields. This document analyzes the site and area resources including topography, soils, water, land use, zoning and transportation and other available information. The site has also been inspected for environmental/planning constraints. In addition, the full EAF Part I submitted with the application has been corrected and is attached herein. Location and Site Overview The project site is located on the northwest corner of King Street and Old Farm Road in Orient, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The subject property can be more particularly described as SCTM number 1000-25-04-11.4. The property has approximately 346.57' of road frontage along King Street, 325.00' of frontage along Old Farm Road, and 50' of frontage along Orchard Street to the north. The project site contains three structures consisting of a small barn, shed, and greenhouse, with vegetated areas consisting of cultivated agricultural fields. The site does not contain wetlands or any additional known historically and ecologically significant resources. This review will discuss the proposed project and its potential impact on the land resources. NELSON. POPE & VOORHIS, LLC Page I ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING g • • Orchard Acres @ Orient EAF Part 1 Review NP&V#00112 Proposed Project The proposed project involves the subdivision of a 17.59 acre parcel into 4 residential lots. The proposed lots have the following lot sizes: Lot 1 — 13.63 acres; Lot 2 — 1.60 acres, Lot 3 — 1.04 acres and Lot 4 — 1.32 acres. Lot 1 contains a building envelope size of 1.75 acres, and the applicant has indicated in the EAF Part I that the development rights within the remaining area of this lot may be purchased in the future. Lot 2 and the building envelope of Lot 1 are located in the northeastern portion of the parcel, and Lot 3 and Lot 4 are located in the southwest comer. Access to the proposed lots would be provided by two common driveways, one with frontage along Orchard Street to service Lot 1 and Lot 2 and the second with frontage on King Street to service Lot 3 and Lot 4. The minor subdivision was designed under a cluster development, and the proposed lots are "flag pole" lots, which creates the extension of private drives beyond each common driveway. There is no additional recreational or open space associated with this proposed subdivision. Land Use and Zoning The project site is located in an area that contains a mix of residential, agricultural and undeveloped vacant land. The dominant land use in the general area is residential, and the proposed residential subdivision is consistent with surrounding uses. The majority of the site consists of cultivated agricultural fields, most of which is expected to remain following development of the proposed subdivision. The site is zoned R-80 Residential, which requires a minimum lot size of 80,000 SF, or just slightly less than 2 acres. Maximum permitted lot coverage within the R-80 zoning district is equivalent to 20% of the lot area, with a livable floor area of 850 s.f. per dwelling unit. The lots within the proposed subdivision are substandard, although the subdivision is a cluster development designed to preserve additional open space. The use of clustering allows these dimensional requirements to be reduced in order to maintain a part of the site in open space. Although building envelopes are not shown on the minor subdivision map, it is anticipated that the building envelopes could meet all the other zoning and dimensional requirements within the R-80 zoning district. Residential development of the subdivided property should not require zoning variances, as the proposed subdivision was designed under a cluster design. R-80 zoning is located to the east and south, with R-40 located to the north and west. Additional R-80 zoning is located beyond the R-40 zoning farther to the north. While R-80 is the predominant zoning district in the immediate area, R-40 is also located farther to the south, with small areas zoned HB Business, B Business, and MI located farther north, northwest, and west of the site, respectively. Land use in the general area is predominantly residential and the lots within the surrounding R-80 zoning district are dominated by substandard lot sizes. In summary, with respect to land use, the proposed project is similar to the developments in the surrounding area and is an allowable use within the R-80 zoning district. Furthermore, the Town Planning Board has requested an Agricultural Easement be placed on the area outside of the 1.75 acre building envelope within Lot 1, if the development rights are not offered for sale. The land use and zoning impacts of the proposed project are expected to be minimal. i d NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS, LLC Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING • Orchard Acres @ Orient EAF Part I Review NP&V#00112 Traffic Generation The proposed use would be expected to increase traffic generation upon full establishment of the site as compared to existing conditions. The future development of the land is not anticipated to generate significant additional traffic to the area. Due to the location of the site and consideration of area roadways, an increase in trip generation at the site would not be expected to have a significant impact on the area roadways. The site access drive appears adequate and the horizontal and vertical road curvature allows good sight distance. Soils and TonogrW The site is relatively flat throughout, with all existing slopes between approximately 0-10%. The property does not contain any significant landforms or geological features. The site slopes gradually to the south towards Kings Road. The Planning Board has requested that Covenants and Restrictions be placed on the property, specifically to control any run-off generated by any improvements within the individual lots, preventing additional runoff from impacting the adjacent street and reduce the amount of run-off that is currently flooding the roadway. The soil survey identifies the subject site as lying within an area characterized solely by Haven loam soils, 0 to 2% slopes (HaA). A specific description of the soil type found on-site is found below (Warner et al., 1975): Haven loam, 0-3%slopes (HaA) — This soil has the profile described as representative of the series. It is mostly nearly level and generally is on outwash plains. Some areas of this soil are on moraines and generally are on the top of low-lying hills. Some of these areas are slightly undulating. Most areas of this soil are large, but on moraines the areas are smaller and are irregular in shape. The hazard of erosion is slight on this soil. Because of the nearly level slope and ease of excavation,most areas of this soil in the western part of the County are being used for housing developments and industrial parks. The Haven Loam series is described within the Suffolk County Soil Survey as land which is suitable for development, with good leaching potential. The hazard of erosion hazard is slight on HaA soils. The topography and soils on site do not appear to present severe development constraints. Water Resources Public water is supplied to the general area by the Suffolk County Water Authority, although the site itself is not specifically connected to public water. There is a 4 inch main along the west side of Browns Hill Road, which extends to a 2 inch main that serves the residential subdivision along View Drive and South View Drive. The 4 inch main discussed above begins at, and only extends north of, the Browns Hill Road Well Field and Substation, located approximately 6000' northeast of the project site. It is estimated that the proposed residences will utilize approximately 1,200 gallons of water per day and each lot will be connected to an on site well. Additional water use is anticipated due to the expected continuation of agricultural use within a portion of Lot 1. A NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS. LLC Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSLLTING g • • Orchard Acres @ Orient EAF Par[I Review NP&V#00112 Sanitary disposal with in the proposed subdivision will be managed by on-site underground sewage leaching systems. In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published The Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study). The 208 Study identified eight (8) bydrogeologic zones in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. These zones were distinguished based upon differences in underlying groundwater flow patterns and water quality. The subject site is located within SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which according to Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, has an allowable flow of 600 gallons per day (gpd) per acre in areas served by public water. Therefore, the allowable nitrogen bearing flow for the site is 10,554 gpd. The sanitary design flow is computed using SCDHS manual Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other Than Single Family Residences. The manual establishes the design flow as follows: Sinele family dwelline 300 gpd x 4 dwellings 1,200 gpd Therefore, the proposed residential subdivision would conform with Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and would not be expected to adversely affect groundwater quality provided properly functioning systems are designed and installed. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site is less than 3 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the 1997 SCDHS water table map. The topographic elevation on site ranges from approximately 15-20 feet above msl, based on the prepared minor subdivision map. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 12-17 feet. The direction of groundwater flow is towards the south. The depth to groundwater on site is not expected to have significant constraints on the location of septic systems on the parcel. A standard, three pool septic system typically requires a minimum depth to groundwater of approximately 9-10 feet to allow adequate depth for leaching. Therefore, limited fill may be needed for installation of systems where depth to groundwater is shallow. SUMMARY In conclusion, residential development of the site would generally conform to the character of the area. The site does not appear to contain significant environmental features that would limit residential development, provided adequate drainage and containment of on-site runoff are achieved and sanitary systems are properly designed and constructed. The proposed project will increase waste water generation, solid waste generation and water use, in addition to increasing taxes which would be distributed to the various jurisdictions. The site is expected to increase the number of trips entering and exiting the site, although is not anticipated to cause a significant impact to the surrounding roadways. Once a determination of use within the area outside of the 1.75 acre building envelope in Lot 1 is resolved to the satisfaction of the Planning Board, a Negative Declaration may be appropriate. NELSON, POPE 6 VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING Page 14-1b-2 (2187)-7c is 617.21 S EQ R Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full FAF is designed to help applicants and agencies cletermine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. I requent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may he technically expert in environmental analysis- In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular arca may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. hhe full EAF is intended to provide a method wheteby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAI: is comprised of three parts: - Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. fay identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impactfile form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or rtducecL Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part S is used to evaluate whether or not file irnpacl is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAT completed for this project: 1i Part 1 I. 1 Part 2 (-]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A- The project will not result in any large and important impacl(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PAIR 1 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C- The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. " A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Ac ti !s���� / iQ C�j/hCf} Si LCAj f Lir $n+eo-a-r-r'.�.-Wig__(-jai til Rrntt�loLt.Onl ---- Name of Action Name of Lead Agency �— Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 *PART 1—PROJECT INFORMARN Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: phis doulment is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed.may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Paris 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAl will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Orcbard s__i-Keith ScDtt—BQ�pnl_—_ _ LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Munlcipallty and County) King Street Old Farm Road/orchard_ Street _Southold, Suffolk Count NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Suffolk Environmental Consulting • Inc. (A4ent1 __ (516) 537-5160 ADDRESS P 0 . Box_2003 CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Bridgehampton NY 11932 NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Keith_Scott Morton (212) 889-6643 ADDRESS CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE New York NY 10001 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivide 17 . 59 acres into 4 residential parcels including agricultural reserve area . Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ClUrban ]Industrial 1-1Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest MAgriculture L70ther 2. Total acreage of project area: 1 7 • 59 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Urushland (Non-agricultural) _ acres acres Forested _ acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc ) --1-7-5-5-- acres 17 , 43 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of LCL) _ acres _ acres Water Surface Area _ acres _ acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces _r)_-0_4 ___ acres _ ?1 _ 1 F acres Other (Indicate type) _.- acres _ _ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Haven loam a. Soil drainage: ■Well drained 1 00 % of site (.]Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained —_ % of site b If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? i_,zr-5Sc}acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). *inclusive of proposed 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes ONO common driveways a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5_ Approximate percentage of propose0project site with slopes: Mo-Loo/1, _ 13/ 1110-115% 90 L115% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the Stale or the National Registers of Historic Places? ayes [INo 7 Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? MYes UNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? 14 1; (in feet) ± u-\--V 9_ Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ayes []No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ayes 54No 11 Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as thtealened or endangered? I lYes ■No According to -__aS'ACP A _ AnAarcpn Identify each species _ 12 Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (ie , cliffs, clunes, other geological formations) ❑Yes ENO Describe -_ — — 13_ Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? I lyes ■No If yes, explain ---_------__.__— — _ - 14. Does the present site include seen( views known to be important to the community? ayes IINo 15 Streams within or contiguous to project arca: _ Nana.-_--------- - - ---- a Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributory 16. 1_ake5, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Nnna --___-- -_- _----.----- b Size (11, acres) -- -- 17. Is the site served by existing public ulilitieO ❑Yes MNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? CIYes I INo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connec(ion? I_lYes I )No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ayes ENO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical I nvironmental Area designated pursuant to Article tl of the [CI., and b NYCRR 617? ❑Yes ■No i' 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? 11Yes ENO 9 B. Project Description STs N f��srTra� 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) sl A"A To e&nA"'J a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 17,59 59 _ acres. Ag4L , \1vral 5 ♦ t b. Project acreage to be developed ?��}1 acres initially; 4--d--5'}t acres ultimately c Project acreage to remain undeveloped 1. , ?��P�es *inclusive of existing d. Length of project, in miles:"N/A__- (If appropriate) structures and common driveways . Not inclusive of max , coverage - e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed Az(A as per zoning. f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing SL,/-A- _; proposed -NLA--- g_ Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour -$ (upon completion of project)? In If residential Number and type of housing units: One family Iwo family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 4 _— Ultimately - 4 i Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure N/A_ height; width; length. vvknowN j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 721 ft. 3 2. Flow much natural material (i e , rock, earth, etc ) will be removed from the site? tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ■Yes L INo I_IN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? LanS1SS�p�.na aGsoria Pd wwav _ b Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Eyes l-1No residential use c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes KNo )}, SS 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres 5- Will any mature forest (over 100 Years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? UYes MNo *anticipate residential development and co[�ti�tugdl fal7mi�t� 6. If single phase project Anticipated period of construction -b montlx, me acing cemo (;n). 7 If nurlli-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated —_— (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 _ month ___ Year, (including demolition) c- Approximate completion date of final phase month Year. d. Is phase1 functionally dependent on subsequent phasos? L�Yes ❑No s Will blasting occur during construction? I..IYes ■No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction —AL-e-10 ' after project is rompletc 0 - 10. Ncunber of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11 Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? I lYes ENO If yes, explain 12 Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I ]Yes LNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewago, industrial, etc.) and amount — b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharge(] -- 13 Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Eyes f INo Typeeventual septic system to serve residences 14. Will surface area of an existing water hody increase or decrease by proposal? UYes 5KNo Explain ---- — 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a Too year flood plain? Uyes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? MYes ENO roLLOuIINd 17e✓6t0Pfn 7- a. If yes, what is the amount per month ±-0. 4 — tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facilitybeused? ( ]Yes ❑No c If yes, give name izESau�ic6 zecpae FActurv; location CUTcllodUE — d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Eyes ❑No e. If Yes, explain 2ecyCt4X4LES Wtu. 7 �nit002rAl�_ __— FAuci7y 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ENO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __— tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? _--- years. 1d. Will projectuse hfrbicides or pesc tiides? ■Yes L7No 19_ Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per clay)? ❑Yes ■No 20 Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? UYes NNo 21. Will project result in in increase in energy use? Myes UNo If yes , indicate type(s)electric/oil typical of residential use (eventually) 22. If water su I is from wells, indicate Pmnpmg capacity 3o gallons/minntite. /I pP Y �/ 2oo Vd 4)a nq 4a"N"r dwW tb nq. nllon5/da �1 Si'491C 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 3600 g< y' VSG r'lmAiRLit �°' �� � / 24 Does project involve Local, stale or federal funding? lyes ■No r rights If yes, explain No_funai ng fob subdivision-r—prChase__of r3P�c� —t -- -- ,, "i h1 P in future s • 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Dale City, Town, Village Board I]Yes UNo _ City, Town, Village Planning Board Wes ❑No _ SubdlyisiOn 4/99 City, Town Zoning Board 1-11'es No _ City. County Health Department Wes No Subdivision 5/99 _ Other I.ocal Agr�icies UYes UNo Other Regional Agencies f )Yea UNo Slate Agencies IIYes No Iederal Agencies I IYes No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Eye's UNo If Yes, indicate decision required: I honing annendmenl Clzoning variance I.Ispedal use permit Nsubdivision Usite plan I Inew/revision of master plan I_hesourrc management plan I lolher _ 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? _ R-80 (Residential) 3 What is file maximrun potential development of the site if developed as permitted by tyre present zoning? 8._residential parcels 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? _ReduC e prop ots ) 5- What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? G Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Eyes UNo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/ mile radius of propo , tion? Residential (R-40 & R-80) Pre—existing non—conforming residen laell � parcels -- __ dominant tl. Is the proposed action coil, >a(it)le with adjoining/sunounding land uses within a Y. mile? Eyes UNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? •� 7/. �. acre 10. Will proposed action require any aulhorizalion(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ■No 11 Will the proposed action create a dennand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fi 2 protectir-I)? ■Yes UNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ■Yes UNo 12 Will file proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? UYes ONO a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes UNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project If Ihere are or may be any adverse impacts associated With your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the nneasures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/S991<9or Nam Bru e A. Anderson, Suff . Environmental -- _ Date 7 13L9 _ _ Title Agent If the lion is in the Coastal Area, and you are a stale agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding will, this assessment. Part 2—PROOT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAG*UDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ■NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ [-]Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 13 No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. Cl ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 2. Will there be an effect t%. -ay unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ENO DYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No 6 12 3 IMPACT ON WATER Smal o Potential Can Impact Be 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ENO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ C3 Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ C]Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ E-1 Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ E—)Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 Cl ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ Dyes El No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ C1 Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ EYes []No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 7 • 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mltlgated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ 13 Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ■NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ■NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ■NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ E]Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑NO ■YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ) Yes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ []Yes []No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, Yes ❑No strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether El []Yes []No man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their El 11 Yes ONO enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant 1:1Y es of scenic views known to be important to the area. ❑Yes C3 No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes C3 No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12, Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? -W ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register ❑Yes ❑No of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ project site. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: lldknOWA/- Si T6 is Ga Rr o r 0 ❑ <Yes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 INNO OYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ El Yes ❑No 1:1 ❑Yes []No Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 9 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRAMORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ONO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ANO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Cl ❑ ❑Yes 0N • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ [--]Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ C1 Yes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ Cl ❑Yes ❑NO .,_ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ C3 Yes ❑No 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH ACHARACTER � 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ModLaprge Mitigated By Impact act Im act Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO EYES • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ Cl ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ® ❑ Eyes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO DYES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(sj. 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 Hrk.-26-e000 ©(.gib 516 425 1251 P.01/1" m.5 NELSON, POPE 6 VOORHIS, LLC EM✓IRGNMEN`rA: PLANNING + CONSULTWG 572 WALT W'NI' AN ROAD,N'ELVLL.E,NY 11747•2199 re317 am-Sana PAX feat; 426-1Q57 npv3ne1e- npppe=m FAX COVER SHEET Melissa Spiro Phone 1-631-765-1938 Fax: 1-631-765-3136 From: Shang Lacey Dare: April 28, 2000 Re: Orchard Acres O. of Pages: 16 (including Cover) Comments: Melissa, Attached please find the review for the above referenced subdivision. I will also mail the origLnal. Please feel free to call should you have any questions. Sincerely, Shana fel-G�'v,RPM 6 V=Pl M.LLC GNVYPGPMAgNTgL ♦ PIANNI G • :ON&LJLTN6 RPP-28-2000 0,4=41 516 425 1257 P.06/17 NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC PRIF ENVIRONMENTAL U PLANNING • CONS-11-TING 578 WALT WM7 ' I4N 'ICAO,MELVILI.E NY n 1747- 2166 (B31) 47 -5665 FAX (631) d25-1257 nr"gf16I9Ct1popB.= FAX COYER SHEET To: Melissa Spiro Phone: 1-631-765-1938 Fax: 1-631-765-3136 From. Shana Lacey Dare: April 28, 2000 Be. Orchard Acres 1Vo. of Pages: 16 (including Cover) Comments: Melissa, Attached please find the review for the above referenced subdiiision. I will also mail the original, Please feel free to call should you have any questions. Sincerely, Shana N6L6ON.R=-E 6 '✓00lq.II9. :_:C ENV'9CNNL-NTA:- • P_�NN3 ppNSVL L'i�(i ,iPR-2S--20L!1' 071:41 51h 425 1257 P.071/17 12, (2/37)—i c • • 817.21 SEOR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full l Ar is designed Io help applicants and agencies CIClerMiDt', in nn orderly manner, whodeor it PrniecL or actiur may be significant. The questior, of whelher an action may be significant is not aiways easy to answerfrequent. iy, ifereare aspects of a proiect lb.ir .lie siiljieetive or unmeasurcri It is also understood Lila[ those who determine significance may leave little Or eo formal knowicdgu of the environment o, may bu technically expert In environmental analysis. In addilioa many who have hivassledge in or,e particularmuii oral' nrrl I,,- ,,,are of the broncler eoncorns affecting, the question of significance. The fill EAF is Intended to provide z method whrieby applicants and ageneses can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, romprchen>ire in nature,Net flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Cornponenls: Tire full EAf is cornpri�ed of three Parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given projetl and its site By identifying basic projucl data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 Part 2: Focuies on identifyirg the Lange of possible imparts that may occur from a project or action. It prnviues gui,:ance as to wlietiler;m impact is likely to be considvrcd small to moderate or whether it is a potentially - larg:: impact rhe form also i(Il.-I lifies whvlltat an impact ran ba mitlgatedror reduced Part 1: If any impact In Part 2 is dentified as potenlially-large, then fart I iF used to evaluate whether OF nal (fie impact is actually important DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this prviecl: In Par: 'I t I Pan 2 I:.IPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on Ih+s tAr(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if apprt-prialci, and any other supporting utforrnation, rind considering hones the meyilude, and i,npurtnnce of each impact, it is reasonably uelenninod by the lead agency [hot: 1 j ZI A. T'he project will not result hr any large and important impactls) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will he prepared. .I 6, Mhaagh the project could have a significant effect cn the environment, there will not be a significant effect fix this Unli<_led Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, r eerefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' I CJ C_ The project may reWit in one or more large and important imoacls that may have a signlficant impact an the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Condrtinned Nei Declaration i^ only valid for Urslislud Acti u�� o S_—'Regi f-h Rind- CrMtO¢) Name of Action Name of Lend Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible 01f:u01 in 1-mad Agency 1'1111, Cit Responsible Cl ficvr Signature of Respdnsrtsira nfflCer in Learl Ayancy Signature.of Prelimer(If differenfrom responsible officer) Date 516 415 1257 P.08. 17 PART 1—PROJECT INFCRMIA4 Prepared by Projecl5ponsor NC%TiC'I. l lips cocr'rnent is r' s!gnec: to assiirl 111 determining whelhar rite ac1'e• proposed may have a slgniricant effect on thr rr vvonr.+ant Please omplete ttt entire farm, Parts A through E, Answers to mese quest+'ons will he considered as pert of=Ile a,-:+„'iiaaticn Irir apprO,.el air0 it ay-be subject Ul lurth r verifiC;JtiJn end pUll'ic r�wiew. Provide anv additirn;d information vo: bel'eve w!II be neeccd to comrdete Farts 2 and 3. It is e;tiper.t2d :f:at Ca-nplEtion Ot ;re hull EAir will be dependent On Information currently available and will our invo!ve new ;tucies, research rt ins^estigath n- It information requiring such additioral sacrk is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance C)�chlssi..�lt�e _; �1L^rte �Utcnl FLocaTlbr: Or A(7TIOR pnclade 511061 Address, Mbrl:,paClr and Cona!yl LKina Straot Old Farm Read Orchard S__:re__e_t ___S_outhold Suffo_ik. County 1----- --r--- 1 NAME OF APPLICANTI$PONSOR -- BUSINESS TELEPHONE � lk. r[tyirnnp ^ta-1 Con �tirra,_Inc3 fAa�nt�------- 15161 537-516C ADDRESS P.0 Box _�_..—._..------------.—_..,��------- CITY/P0 —�� 'ArE ZIP CODE Bridaeham. ton 1T7 11932 _ NAME Or CWNEn :r dinersnll eUSINE5S TELEPHONE 1 'AL}th-4rott irr_o.^----------- - - --- t21?I A89_66d3 Aooaes� i OITY'PO TETaTE LIP 7UrE 1 _1.0001 ( oESCRIP*!ON Or• ASt10A, --�-------- --- —�� Subdivide 17,.59 acres nto 3 re5idential parcels inc iudi.,.g Iagriculturml reserve area . I � Please Complete Each (question--Indicaie N.A. if not applicable A. Site Descriptiori Phys cal setting of overall groject, both developed and urdeveloped areas. 1, Present land rise: CWL,an f_ilndustrial )COmmercini 1. 15tesidentiai Iskint and ❑Rural Inorvfarnt} 711'ore5t RAgri;,ctltu r,• ❑O;hcr _.__--- -----,� — 2. Totai acreage of project area ____.. .�_.5 acres. APPR0k1MATE ACREACJE PRESENTLY nfTER COMPLE'f1UN Meadow or On shiand (Non-agriur7i.ua'') —� acres ---- acres r Orested acres acme Agriralrur. l jneludes orchards, cropland, pasture, e'.c.) 17- 5.5_ acres 17.43 acres Wetland lG'reshwAter or tidal as per Articles 114, 25 of ECL) acr:s acres Water Surface 4rea ,., _ acres ------- —_--_ —__ acres Unv¢getated (Ro k, eaith or [till ._.— arses — acres Roads. buildlns sort other paved surfaces dents _ rt- 7 6 arras Otherflndlcate4ype} — acres �—_ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) en prnl^.cr site? __ Haven loam a. Soil drainage: •Well drai,red x..0.0..— % of site ❑IVIOJU IA)l W II drained ,._ % of site [Jlsoody drained _—__ % of site b. If :ntr awic!.drurel land is mveived. how mar} acres of soil are classifirrl within t.of! group i through 4 of the NYS Land Clas:,ii scat on System' -,--17 C_cperes. ($&e 1 NYCRR VWL *inpju5.:ve of proposed .t. Are there bedrock outs-oPp11Lng5 or. prolrrt s',fc? Ul'cs who common driveways a. What is depth to bedrock? —_—_-- . (in feet) 2 APR-28-2000 07:42 516 425 1257 P.09i17 5 Approximate percentago of prof* projcc t site with alcpes r0-11)96 _40—91" [310-15% 96 1115% or greater _,... A n Ii project aihsranlialh cont g.ious to ;r contain a building, site. or district, lister) on the State or the Nationa' Registers of Historic Places? $[Yes F„!N0 Is pru;eLt substantially ccni,guous to a �oL- lk:od on the Register of Nelional Natural Landmarks? Eves C1No What ii the depth of the walur table? —1 _ (in feet) k 12--04, 9, Is site located o.ve a primarv, principal, or sole source aquifer? Eyes I1No 10 Do hu.nling fishing or sheh fishing opportunities presently exist in the prnject area? Dyes MNo 11. floes project site contain any specter of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? I_),es $[No According to Rrnc� A__ Anr3ergon _.._. Identify eadt species 12. Are !here any unique or unusuJ land forms on the project site? lie , cliffs, chines, other geological formations) Loves ENO Describe _ 13 Is Lhu prr.lert situ nresenlly usod by Ike community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation arca? I 'Yes ■Na II ON, explain ._-.._ 13 Dncs tl,e present site include scenic views known to be important to the Community? Myes C1Nu '15 Sireavis wilhin.. or contig0905 to pmiocl arca' Ft Name of Stream and iijiniv of River to w•h.idi it is tribulory ._...�..��. 16 1.akei, ponds, wetland Prc,ts will6l r.r r,nnliguous to prolcc.l crux. a. Name ___ Nnnp ._.__._ h. Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served by a<isling public. utilities? Lyes MNo al If Yes, docs sufficient capacity cz,st to allow connection? _]Yes DNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? 13yes ❑Nu 18. is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agricadtuic and Markets Law, Article 25 AA, Section 303 and 304? ■Yes END 19, Is the site located in or substantially Contiguous to a Critical LnYirOnntental .Arca designated puunant to Article I1 of the FCL, and 6 NYCRR 6171 ❑Yes RNo 20 Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waslusr ❑Yes MNo B. Project Description *aegis ft rr orw*utc 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as approprinte) +h Attaa Th ¢9�V%AlM a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 17. 59 acres Agvav\`r+rdA b. Project ac«rage to be developed, -- Jn:*mS:fl acres ianiptially; 3--6�-5'}t t acres ultunalely. * c. Project acreage to tema)n undeveloped La-41—)x'acres. *ineiusive of existing Of Length of prnject. in miles:" NJam, ----fit appropriate) structures and common driveways, toot inelusiye of max. coverage e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed .uJ % as per zoning. f Number of off-street parking sprices existing _M1A proposed -1x' A— . g Maximum vehicular trips genetated per (tour _R. (upon completion of project)? It If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Iwo lam ly Multiple Family Condominium Initially -- 4 Ultimately _ i. Dimensions (in feet} of largest proposed structure . N i!A—. height; width; length. vArkroWN I. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupv is? 721 fl. 3 PR-2E-2000 07!43 516 425 1257 P.10i17 2. hla•,v mach nnlurrl material li. rock, earth, etc.) will be r^meved from the si0 tonsjcubie yards 3, will distt:rbecl areas he reclaimed? ■Yes l7No I (NIA a It Ves, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed>Ie^nAa^aei,ll9 al;soci atod wi t•h 15 Will tups(,i! be slnckpilr,d for re(lamr tion? Eyes f]No residential use r- Will uppar subsoil ve stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes MNcr )'I& SS_ 4, tags' many acres of vegetation ftrces, shrubs, ground covers) will he removed from site? :t!z s1- acres.* 5.. will a•cy mM1.1tV lnr?st (OVer 'IOU Years ole!) or other locally.impurtant vcgetalion be removed by thls project? -1Ye5 MNa *anticipate residential development and CoCltipr c u i�a mi 6 If single ;)hale project.. AnCc pated period of co•,struct!nn 1"b month I � g demo�ffdn)' i. If multi-Phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of rommencement phase 1 month yea', (including demolition) C. Approximate cnmule6on dale of I^il lase _ �nonflr _ year. d. Is phage. 1 functionally dependant on subsrpucnt phases? ❑Yes fJNo 0 Will blasting occur during cons'ructio:l? UYrs ■No R. N'untber of jabs generated'. during construction ._—A.G1 30 ; after project is complete l) 10. Number of jobs ellmina'ed by this project 0 11. Wit! project require relocation ul any prnlecic or facilities? C-1yus ANO If yes, explain 12. 15 surface liquid wa re dlsposal involw-P f 1Ycs 19NO a_ If yes, indicate type- of waste (mwage, industrial, et,.,) and amount h. Name a' water body Into which affluent will b¢ dischnrged _,._,-- 11. I5 Subsurface liquid wasle disposal involver)? Eyes ❑No Typeeventual septic system to serve res Inces 14. Will surface ,reit of an existing water hod)' increase or decrease by proposal? 1.7Yes No Explain -- --- 15 Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes ONO 1ra. Will fhe projec! generals solid waste? Yes ONO rouewr.ub 0AV&0007e.u7- a. If yes, what is the amount per month —to— tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? wyes ❑No c If ves, give name ZISESOU'U' location 4fUrLIfD6ye — d Will any wastes not go into a sowage tllsposal system or into a sanitary landfill? tales ONO C. If Yes, explain _29CYCLIfCieta w� 1 R�2 j<,q a 4r 7y V. will the project �fivolve the disposal of solid caste? ❑Ye: ONO a. If yes, wl-,al i; the anticipated rale of disposal> tonslmonth, b. if yeswhat is the anticipated site life? •__ year,, ..til. Will project use heghicides or pefir.ir!es? Ayes 0'40 19 Will project routinely produce- odors (more Iltan one hour per (illy)? QYes !No 20. Will projectf:.,mduce operating noise cxceeding the local ambient noise levels? ("Yes NNo 21 Will project rasull in an fncreas= m enemy usr? Myer [ INo If yes . indicate lypefS)electric(oil txnical of residential use f even -catty) 2i. If water s'-rt-Ply 15 farm wells, indicate Pumping capacityas gallons/minute. 1200 d � v'lrile '�Yy dr✓atlji , 13. Cola) ads?icipnted water usa r.;!a per day 3�DC gallohs/Clay. C t 9Pr 6r ar µ ll V 56 lMt7iALke 24 Does project trf,xlve Local, Sta'.e Or Federal funding? ❑Yes 111111f ' If vcs, ,,, No � _ undin :C__-s.uhda.—.'sign; purehaAo o ,p f '9 tkMe omamt ri4hts _e;rfa in _ APP-2r:',-2000 07:43 516 4Z5 1257 P.1117 :5. Approvals Required: • • ' Submittal Type Dale City. ''O•,vn, viilailc l3ocnl I�Ync lJN0 City. Towfi. village i lnn•r,Og Rc,e..rd Ayes 1?Nosion-- _ 4/99 f.'I tv. Town Zoning Roars! f�li"cs ❑No Ciry. Cnun'.•v F4ml' r U?parttncnt ■Yr% CINu ub vision 5/99 OthelLoci,lAg it 17?; 1.iYgs LJNO Other R-sowm l Auenc ips I.1 V'tl DNO — Slate Agpiwi •s I.!ycs r7No Federal Agencies 111'es f"1No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . 0005 oroposn.d action involve a pinrning m Toning deNsion? eyes 1.7No It yes, indicate C!V60011 rnnuircd f_lznning :ultendmen! is wrriiq ,�nri,,rrr• i.l5pncial u5.+ permit subdivision Us le pfan t Inew;rev�skln of ;nitetrrr plan 1_111's0urr0 ulanayr n'ent plan I..,lnti,er 2. 1b'luxr is the• apn,n)w Cla^s)I;catrvn(sjoi the site? R-80 {Residential ! _ J Wlmi. .5 the niacin+um potential development of the Site if developed as permitted i)y tire present zoning? _ Q,., esi enti_al�arcels 4 What is the )roynsed zoning of Ills si107 ReduCEd—'L4e.Ti"sttp—p op _ ts) �//R 5- What is the It dewApnlenl of the site if developerl as permilted by file proposed 70iling? 4 rQ yc{� "i"^�•�c�i�t ` 1 r'!c` L�sl l�flC]" auLlf_ii V1512n ) 1# G. k tile, propvird action con5lslent w;li, Che recommended uses it? adopted (ncal land use plans? 01'05 L1Nn 7. What are tier predonlinanl land usc(s) and 70 ling classilicr'Itions vrilhin a 'i, mite radiusof pr po e��ff tion? Residential (R-40 & R-80) Pre-existing non-conforming resi3�en la� parcels ----- - dominant_ _ 11. Is the propose[l a;lion rorrgratihlp with rrcljohringtsurrouuding land uses svlll,in a '/ mile? .Wes UNo 9. If the proposed Wro', is the subc!ivisiorr of land, how ninny IOIS are propoicd? 9 a. Wilat is Ike n,inlmunl lot size propo'ed? /.Dy 7r�_ acre 11! Will proposed action req�jre any "Ahori7ationf51 for the formation of 5e•wer or water districts? Cyon ONO 11 Wit! 1110 Propmed anion create a rlemaod for illy commtrllitY Provide0 services frecreatinn. education, police. (i prolectir 0? ■yes ITio ;I. If yes• is ae stint, Capacity s(ifficirml 10 Handle pr0lected clenland? a)e5 []No 12 Will rhe pr;,t,lc,sed act!O❑ result ill Ihar go1w•ralion O( traffic, significantly above present levels? ❑Yes MNo a I Yes, is the existing road nefwC. adoqunte to handle Ilse additional traffic? GYes C'NO D, Informational Details Afiarh any i ciclitional in(ormatlon as may be needed 'n clarify your project, If Were are Oc nlay tie any adverse impact, nss(xioter! with ,oar ilrOp:)sal, plea;r discuss such imr)a;ts and the nscastues which yo0 propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I rertify that t,,Q ir!tOn,+n'i011 provide i ohnvc k true to the be-1 of m-✓ iuxnvlcdt!c. ApplicaniS 55vr r•1.Ir4 Bru u — ..Aciars.n, Suff . Fnvironmentai I — n ----- — �_ --- Late —] 3 99 $iguatu > ✓I i Title,If tia •[ion is in the Coaslal Area, and you are a oaic alenty, comptetu the Caulal Assessment Form before proceeding will, this assessment. APP-2i 2000 07:44 516 425 1257 P.12/17 Part 2—PflWCT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGJPDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information(Reac Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question; Have my responses and determinations been reasonablei 'o he reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2.The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, fur any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The .mpacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, cunsider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impactwi9 occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by charge(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to U Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ . ❑ ❑Yes ONO foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. j • Construction on land where• the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0N 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ . ❑ ❑Yes ONO 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO tons of natural materiel (i•e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO e Construction in a designated floodway, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 2. Will there be an effect tt. _..ry unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes,geological formations, etcJIIIIIINO ❑YES 0 Specific land forms; .—. ., 0 13 0Yes ❑NO AFR-28-2000 07!44 516 425 125'( P.13%17 J IMPACT ATER Small* Potential Can Impact Be Will proposed acI tion affect any water body designated as protected? mModp rate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change iUndc Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) 2NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes Cl No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No • CCnstructfon in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 4. Will proposed action affect any non-proterted existing or new body of water? ONO CYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease In the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO . or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Cl ❑ Oyes ONO • Other impacts: _... _ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater Quality or quantity? ❑NO AYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ Q ❑Yes ONO supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ r ❑Yes ONO day, • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions, • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ I Oyes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ Eyes ONO and;or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ 17 Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment andfor storage facilities. • Other impacts:--- ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ■NO ❑YES Examples that woalc apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 7 APR-23--2',-V0 07:x: 510 425 1257 P.14'17 • 1 Y 3 Small t Potential ' Can Impact Be Mocerate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yet 0N • Proposed Action wi'I allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ Q QYes ONO • 0,her impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ■NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 + Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No refuse per hour • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO heat source produciig more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in theamount of land committed ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ONO to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ C3 Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: _—_ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS B. Will Proposed Aetion affect any threatened or endangered species? ANO ❑YES Examples that would appry to Column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ Q ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ Dyes C3 No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts:­_ ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? @NO CYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No of mature forest (aver 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRiCULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect aaricuitural land resources? Examples that would apply to Column 2 ONO BYES The proposed action would sever, cross or limit acce!s to agricultural w ❑ 111Yes ONO, land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) B APR-22-20CIO 137!45 516 425 1257 P.15%17 • 1 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Proleet Change ` Consvuc ,on activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑Yes 12 No agricultural ianc. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ 0Yes ❑No Of agricultural land or, If located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres o' agricultural land. • The propcsed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultgral r ❑ ryes ONO land management systems[e g,, subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, Strip croppingk or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 13 Yes 0No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ENO OYES ;If necessary, use the visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that wouid apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or proiect compunents obviously different from Q ❑ ❑Yes (Z]No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed 'and uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ OYes ONO aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant LL ❑ screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action Impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? w ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ 0 El Yes DNo contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the 12project site. ❑ ❑Yes ON* • Proposed Actor. will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ archaeological sites on the Nys Site Inventory. ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: riilCnor✓v .,-6 rS Lscr►rsa y 4� eves ONO IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION '3. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO OYES The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ A major reduction of an open space important to the community. 0 Q ❑Yes ONO Other impacts: MYes ❑No C' ❑ 0Yes ❑No 9 RPP-28-2000 074E 516 425 1257 P.16/17 2 3 IMPACT ON TRAPORTATION Sma1llo Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems( Moderate Large Mitigated By ENO OYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people And/or goods. ❑ ❑ [Dyes 0 N • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • Other impacts: Q ❑ OYes ONo IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 + Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy L7 ❑ ❑Yes r INo transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts! ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital. school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo facility, • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). 0 ❑ ❑Yes ONo • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ Q QYes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures, • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ©NO noise screen. • Other impacts: __ _ _ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ENO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo substances 6,e,oil,pesticides,chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission, • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑Yes ONo form (i,e, toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons Of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste, • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10 SPR-29-20630 07:46 516 425 1257 P.17,,17 IMPACT ON GROWT D CHARACTER c 3 OF COMMUNITY OR GHBORHOOD mall t Potential Can Impact Be Will proposed action affect the character of the existing co nmunity? Mpderete Large Mitigated By ONO EYES Impact ` Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 + The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the 0 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protect is located is likely to grow by more than s%, • Tne municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ Ll Yes ONO w It increase by more than 5% per year as a resuit of this project • Proposed action will conflict with officially aoopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ (❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action wall cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace of eliminate axis; ng facilities, structures 0 ❑ ❑Yea [IN* or areas of historic Importance to the community. • Development wilt create a demand for additional community services ❑ Eyes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an Important precedent for future projects- ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1:No • Proposed Action wilt create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ClYes 0 N • rather impacts._ ❑ C ❑Yes CiNo 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO CYE5 If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact at If You Cannot Determine the iNagnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared it one at more impact($) Is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact($) may be mitigated, Instructions Discuss the following for each Impact identified In Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact Describe(if applicable)how the impact cou d be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change($). 3 Based on the information avaiiable, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • 1'he probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments; 1i TOTAL P..7 ('4='R-23-20!:07 07!32 515 425 1257 P.02!1? • • Orchard Aedes @ Orient EAP Part I Review NP&V 800112 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS ORCHARD ACRES Ca: ORIENT' Prepared rbr: Melissa Spiro Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971-0959 Prepared by: Nehon,Pope&Voorhis,LLQ" 572 Walt 4Vhimian Road Melville,New York 11 i4' Date: Apn?27.2000 The Town of Southold P'.a-ming Board has retained Nelson, Pope do Voorhis, 110 (NP&V) for consulting services in mvie•N of the above referenced subdivision As currently proposed, the application invo:ves the subdivision of an approximately 17.59 acre parcel into 4 residential lots and two associated common driveways, The site currently contains three structures including a 3ma'1 barn, -~led ai,d greenhouse, with vegetated areas consist of cultivated agricultural fields. Phis document analyzes the site and area resources including topography, soils, water., land use, zoning and transportation and other available information• The site has also been inspected for environmental/planning constraints. L-r addition, the fall EAF Part I submitted with the application has been corrected and is attached hereat. Locatio paid Site Overview The project site is located on the northwest comer of King Street and Old Farm Road in Orient, Town of Southold County of Suffolk. The subject property can be more particularly described as SCTM number 1000-25-04-11.4, The property has approximately 346.57' of road fTontage along King Street„ 325.00' of frontage along Old Farm Road, and 50' of frontage along Orchard Street to the north. The project site contains three structures consisting of a small barn, shed, and greenhouse, with vegetated areas consisting of cultivated agricultural fields. The site does not contain wetlands or any additional known historically and ecologically significant resources, This review will discuss the proposed project and its potential impart on the land resources. 1 NELSON PCOM C.Wp HZ,. E VIR1 K'ZNTRL + �NIJING . ;'01JBULTINC Page 1 APP-28-2000 0 7:�-9 516 425 1257 P.03 '17 • Orchard Acres Orient EAF Part I Review NP&V 000112 Proposed Project The proposed project involves the subdivision of a 17.59 acre parcel into 4 residential lots, The proposed lots have the following let sizes: Lot 1 — 13.53 acres; Lot 2 — 1.60 acres, Lot 3 — 1.04 acres and Lot 4 — 1.32 acres. Lot 1 contains a building envelope size of 1.75 acres, and the applicant has indicated in the EAF Part I that the development rights within the remaining area of this lot may be purchased in the future. Lot 2 and the building envelope of Lot 1 are located in the northeastern portion of the parcel, and Lot 3 and Lot 4 are located in the southwest corner. Access to the proposed lots would be provided by two common driveways, one with frontage along Orchard Street to service Lot 1 and Lot 2 and the second with frontage on King Street to service Lot 3 and Lot 4. The minor subdivision was designed under a cluster development, and the proposed lots are "flag pole" lots, which creates the extension of private drives beyond each common driveway. There is no additional recreational or open space associated with this proposed subdivision. Land L15e and Zoning The project site is located in an area that contains a mix of residential, agricultural and undeveloped vacant land. The dominant land use in the general area is residential, and the proposed residential subdivision is consistent with surrounding uses. The majority of the site consists of cultivated agricultural fields, most of which is expected to remain following development of the proposed subdivision. The site is zoned R-80 Residential, which requires a minimum lot size of 80,000 SF, or just slightly less than 2 acres. Maximum permitted lot coverage within the R-80 zoning district is equivalent to 201/0 of the lot area,with a livable floor area of 850 s.£ per dwelling unit. The lots within the proposed subdivision are substandard, although the subdivision is a cluster development designed to prescrvc additional open space, The use of clustering allows these dimensional requirements to be reduced in order to maintain a pan of the site in open space. Although building envelopes are not shown on the minor subdivision map, it is anticipated that the building envelopes could meet all the other zoning and dimensional requirements within the R-80 zoning district. Residential development of the subdivided property should not require zoning variances, as the proposed subdivision was designed under a cluster design. R-80 zoning is located to the east and south, with R-40 located to the north and west. Additional R-80 zoning is located beyond the R40 zoning farther to the north. While R-80 is the predominant zoning district in the immediate area, R-40 is also located farther to the south, with small areas zoned HB Business,B Business, and MI located farther north,northwest, and west of the site, respectively. Land use in the general area is predominantly residential and the lots within the surrounding R-80 zoning district are dominated by substandard lot sizes. In summary, with respect to land use, the proposed project is similar to the developments in the surrounding area and is an allowable use within the R-80 zoning district. Furthermore, the Town Planning Board has requested an Agricultural Easement be placed on the area outside of the 1.75 acre building envelope within Lot 1, if the development rights are not offered for sale. The land use and zoning impacts of the proposed project are expected to be minimal. WW* NELSON,P S V*c ,,Hfe LLC 6� NN TA , P'_GNN NG , 20NB'.M n,,Y. Page 2 RPR-26-2000 07:40 516 425 1257 P.04-'17 • • Orchard Acres%Orient EAF Part I Review NP&V"6112 Traffic Creneration The proposed use would be expected to increase traffic generation upon full establishment of the site as compared to existing conditions. The future development of the land is not anticipated to generate significant additional traffic to the area. Due to the location of the site and consideration of area roadways,an increase in trip generation at the site would not be expected to have a significant impact on the area roadways. The site access drive appears adequate and the horizontal and vertical road curvature allows good sight distance. Soils and Topography The site is relatively flat throughout, with all existing slopes between approximately 0-10%. The property does not contain any significant landforms or geological features. The site slopes gradually to the south towards Kings Road. The Planning Board has requested that Covenants and Restrictions be placed on the property, specifically to control any run-off generated by any improvements within the individual lots, preventing additional runoff from impacting the adjacent street and reduce the amount of run-off that is currently flooding the roadway. The soil survey identifies the subject site as lying within an area characterized solely by Haven loam soils, 0 to 2% slopes (Ha.A). A specific description of the soil type found on-site is found below(Warner et al.,1975): Haven loarn, 6-3%slopes (Ha.4)-This soil has the profile described as representative of the series. It is mostly nearly level and generally is on outwaslr plains. Some areas of this soil are on moraines and generally are on the top of low-lying hills. Some of these areas are slightly undulating. Most areas of this sol] are large, but an moraines the areas are smaller and arc irregular in shape. The hazard of erosion is slight on this soil. Because of the nearly level slope and ease of excavation,most areas of this soil in the western part of the County are being used for housing developments and industrial parks. The Haven Loam series is described within the Suffolk County Soil Survey as land which is suitable for development,with good leaching potential. The hazard of erosion hazard is slight on HaA soils. The topography and soils on site do not appear to present severe development constraints. Water Resources Public water is supplied to the general area by the Suffolk County Water Authority, although the site itself is not specifically connected to public water. There is a 4 inch main along the west side of Browns Hill Road,which extends to a 2 inch main that serves the residential subdivision along View Drive and South View Drive. The 4 inch main discussed above begins at, and only extends north of, the Browns Hill Road Well Field and Substation, located approximately 6000' northeast of the project site. It is estimated that the proposed residences will utilize approximately 1.200 gallons of water per day and each lot will be connected to an on site well. Additional water use is anticipated due to the expected continuation of agricultural use within a portion of Lot 1. a" NELSON F 9 6 VOO'Hin,LLC pMJIgOND6NTA„ . P- NWw • CGN^ LR Nr Page APP-29-2000 17:40 516 425 1257 P.©5/17 • • Orchard Acres t Orient EAP Part I Review NP&V#00112 Sanitary disposal with in the proposed subdivision will be managed by on-site underground sewage leaching systems. In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published The Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management plan (208 Study). The 208 Study identified eight (8) hydrogeologic zones in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. These zones were distinguished based upon differences in underlying groundwater flow patterns and water quality. The subject site is located within SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which according to Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, has an allowable flow of 600 gallons per day (gpd) per acre in areas served by public water. Therefore, the allowable nitrogen bearing flow for the site is 10,554 gpd. The sanitary design flow is computed using SCDHS manual Standards for Approval ofplans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other Than Single Family,Residences The manual establishes the design flow as follows: Sin¢le family dwelIint 300 bpd x L dwellings 1,20C,gpd Therefore, the proposes residential subdivision would conform with Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and would not oe expected to adversely affect groundwater quality provided properly functioning systems are designed and installed. The elevation of griundwater beneath the subject site is less than 3 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the 1997 SCDHS water table map. The topographic elevation on site ranges from approximately 15-20 feet above mal, based on the prepared minor subdivision map. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 12-17 feet. The direction of groundwater flow is towards the south. The depth to groundwater on site is not expected to have significa;tt constraints on the location of septic systems on the parcel. A standard, three pool septic system. typically requires a minimum depth to groundwater of approximately 9-10 feet to allow adequate depth for leaching. Therefore, limited fill may be needed for installation of systems where depth to groundwater is shallow. SUMMARY In conclusion, residential development of the site would generally conform to the character of the area. The site does not appear to contain significant environmental features that would limit residential development, provided adequate drainage and containment of on-site runoff are achieved and sanitary systems are properly designed and constructed. The proposed project will increase waste water generation, solid waste generation and water use, in addition to increasing takes which would be distributed to the various jurisdictions. The site is expected to increase the number of trips entering and exiting the site, although is not anticipated to cause a significant impact to the surrounding roadways. Once a determination of use within the area outside of the 1.75 acre building envelope in Lot 1 is resolved to the satisfaction,of*die Planning Board, a Negative Declaration may be appropriate. W hMLSCeH?OPE 6v'L+GRFi:n,SLG EWFACrW AL • PLAP$ 1.40 CGIVSLJC'I Page PLANNING BOARD OR 9KI,M EO ,r OSUFF06'r Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Chairmanp� y� P.O. Box 1179 WILLL4M J. CREMER9 o "� Southold, New York 11971-0959 GO �� KENNETH L.EDWARDS .a. T �, Fax(631) 765-3136 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. • Telephone (631) 765-1938 _ RICHARD CAGGIAi7C �IJOl �a0a PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 19, 2000 Mr. Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 Re: Review of EAF for Orchard Acres SCTM#1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above-mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Also enclosed are: 1. Map dated July 15, 1999; 2. Planning Board resolution dated July 20, 1999. Please refer to this letter for information pertaining to the subdivision; and 3. Report dated July 22, 1999 from James Richter and the Planning Board's response. The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on July 19, 1999. Although the lead agency process was initiated by resolution on July 19th, as per the applicant, the process was put on hold while the applicant discussed the sale of the development rights on Lot#1 with the County. The applicant has now asked the Planning Board to proceed with the SEQRA review. The $400. review fee has been submitted by the applicant. If all is in order,the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the May 1, 2000 public meeting. Please submit your report no later than April 28th in order for the Board to review it before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, _�1r- Melissa Spiro, Southold Town Planner Enc. Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village,Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-5198 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President April 6, 2000 Mellisa Spira Southold Planning Board Town Hall P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Subdivision - Orchard Street Farm _.-Situate: Orchard Street, Orient SCTM # 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Ms. Spira, Enclosed herewith please find a copy of the resolution adopted by the Southold Planning Board for the subdivision referenced above. The resolution renders sketch plan approval, classifies the action as an unlisted action pursuant to SEQRA and commences lead agency coordination in contemplation of a SEQRA Determination. I do not know whether or not the Planning Board commenced lead agency coordination for this unlisted action. However, I note that coordination is optional under the current SEQRA Regulations (See 6 NYCRR Part 617.6(b)(4)(i)). My interest in all of this is to secure a negative declaration which is required in order to perfect my application with the Health Department. By way of this correspondence, I request that you forward to this office the SEQRA Determination -Negative Declaration whether or not this unlisted action was coordinated. In any event, the time frames for the required SEQRA process have been g.eatly exceeded acid thus I would hope you would expedite this request. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, Bruce A. Anderson cc. K. Morton R. Hughes, Esq. APR 10 2000 Southold Td,-n Pianning Ward n t ._ PLANNING BOARD MEMBER �SbfFO(,� t �" Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. 5' ���0 C Chairman 4 h Gym P.O. Box 1179 WILLL9M J. CREMERS w '� ? Southold, New York 11971-0959 KENNETH L.EDWARDS y, /? Fax (631) 765-3136 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. • Telephone (631) 765-1938 RICHARD G.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 25, 2000 Bruce Anderson Suffolk County Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Main St. P.O. Box 2003 Bridgehampton, NY 11932 Re: Minor Subdivision for Orchard Acres (a.k a. Keith Scott Morton) SCTM # 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Anderson: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday January 24, 2000. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from January 19, 2000 to July 19, 2000. Sketch approval was granted on July 19, 1999. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. �,s Chairman cc: Robert Hughes Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. 5 Newman Village, Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (516) 537-5160 Fax: (516) 537-5198 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President Hand Delivered January 10, 2000 Southold Town Planning Board c/o Melissa Spira Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Orchard Street Farm Subdivision Situate: Orchard Street, Orient SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Board Members, As you may recall, your Board rendered sketch plan approval for the subdivision referenced above on July 19, 1999. Sketch plan approval will expire on January 19, 2000. By way of this correspondence, I hereby request a six month extension on the sketch plan approval. Sketch plan approval would now expire on July 19, 2000. Our reason for req estin this extension is because the required approv I from Suffolk County Department of Heal h Services has not been granted. Kindly sche ule this subdivision matter for extension during the next available Planning Board meeting. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. cerely, ruce A. Anderson cc. K. Morton R. Hughes, Esq. S. Angel, Esq. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER.."+ DgUFFO(,�c 0� �G Town Hall, 53095 Main Road BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. h� 'yam P.O. Box 1179 Chairman -� Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J. CREMERS W Fax (516) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone(516) 765-1938 GEORGERICHARDIG.WARD 'JR. `• PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 15, 1999 Robert S. Hughes 316 Front Street P.O. Box 128 Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Orchard Acres (a.k.a. Keith Scott Morton) SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Hughes: The Planning Board reviewed the attached recommendation from the Orient Fire District at the September 13th work session. The Planning Board concurs with the Fire District's recommendation. The firewell must be indicated on the final subdivision map. The firewell must be installed and accepted by the Fire District prior to the issuance of any building permits for the lots within the subdivision. The Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must include a statement that the firewell must be installed prior to the issuance of any building permits. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions regarding the above. Since, i Melissa Spiro Senior Plann r enc. 01t1ENT MS F�aF DISta�� ORIENT FIRE DISTRICT 23300 Main Road, Orient, NY 11957 August 25, 1999 516-323-2445 • Fax 516-323-9706 Chairman Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Orchard Street Farm, 1000-254-11.4 Dear Chairman Orlowski: The Board of Fire Commissioners of the Orient Fire District has reviewed the map for the above-mentioned parcel. It is the recommendation of the Board that a firewell be placed on the 15' wide road with a 50' easement, approximately 200' in from Orchard Street. (This is noted on the map with a small x.) The well must be capable of the sustained production of 300 gallons per minute each of silt-free water for fire-fighting purposes. The minimum construction requirements are as follows: a) casing: 8 inch schedule 40 steel b) screen: 8 inch pipe size wirewound stainless steel c) screen length: 20 feet with gravel pack d) well outlet to be finished at 2 feet above grade level, threaded and capped Please do not hesitate to contact us should you have any questions. Sincerely, YMA'd ftv' L— -- Cynthia Caprise Fire District Secretary-Treasurer cc: Attorney Robert S. Hughes Orchard Street rer�o4ot waa Cil KAW n 561I1 f 7 a❑f4�w „� 42' f 1.M,r n /(f _._... ND'L4040E 900P7__. N06-DWM �� o zsH y 1 BUiLDIN6 1 ENVELOPE: LEP> A(, Lot #2 v Area 1.6G Ac,4 e5 s4s2111 Lot #I Area I:E (F 2 Zoe' a. Lot #4 Area = 32 Acres " r G ]I]• � i � I r. I Lot #3 r Aea -- r I.G4 Acres PECO LAND TRUST MP6 296 Hampton Road,P.O.Box 1776,Southampton,NY 11969 (516)283-3195 Fax:(516)204-0711 www.peconidandtrust.org August 26, 1999 .r 3 AUG `Z 7 Andrew Stype Realty Inc. PO Box 63 Mattituck,N.Y. 11952I.1rtir1',rxg o,oar' Dear Andy: In accordance with our telephone conversation of Aug. 17,1999, I am enclosing a survey showing the sketch plan for the Keith Morton subdivision(SCTM 91000-25-4-11.4). Please proceed with an appraisal of the parcel for the purchase of development rights by Suffolk County. Sincerely, Sherman Director of Public Programs Enc. CC. R.S. Hughes Southold Town Planning Board A. Grecco, SC Dept. of Real Estate m5 ROBERT T S. HUGHES Aeeorney aE Li w 316 Front S&eee Telephone (516) 977-2700 P.®.Bo: 128 Fax (516) 977-0955 Greenpore, New Yorlr 11999 August 16, 1999 Mr. Hoot Sherman Peconic Land Trust 296 Hampton Road Southampton,New York 11968 RE: SALE OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS TO PART OF 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Sherman, Keith Morton has asked me to write this letter, the purpose of which is, to confirm the telephone conversation you had with Mr. Morton earlier today. Mr. Morton understands that the Peconic Land Trust,through your good efforts, has reached an agreement with Suffolk County, regarding the possible purchase of development rights. The three essential aspects of this agreement are:- 1) The County has agreed to fund any purchase on its own and not in a split arrangement with Southold Town; 2) The County will pay for an appraisal of the value of the development rights; 3)Mr. Andy Stype has been retained to perform the appraisal. Please let me know if there is anything that this office can do to facilitate this process. On behalf of Mr. Morton, thank you very much for all of your efforts. erely, ( / /I V rt usZ0e cc: Keith Morton Southold Town Planning Board NI Bruce Anderson AU : 18 1989 $tMc W-I Ip�fiii�i$�'�l ROBERT S. HUGHES Ae&me.raE I. w 316 Frene S&eee Telephone 15161977-2700 P.OBoz 128 Fax 15161977-0955 Greenpore, New York 11999 August 4, 1999 Mr. Hoot Sherman Peconic Land Trust 296 Hampton Road Southampton,New York 11968 Dear Mr. Sherman, I am writing this letter on behalf of Keith Scott Morton. As you know,Mr. Morton is the owner of a 17.59 acre parcel of land in Orient(SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4). This property, formerly known as"The VanNostrand Farm", is now called"Orchard Street Farm'. On July 19, 1999, Mr. Morton was granted Sketch Plan approval by the Southold Town Planning Board for a Minor Subdivision. A copy of the resolution commemorating that approval is enclosed, for your records. An integral part of Mr. Morton's plan is to sell the development rights to approximately 11 acres of this parcel Please consider this letter as an offer to sell the development rights, at a reasonable and appropriate price to either Suffolk County or Southold Town. In that vein, Mr. Morton asks that the Peconic Land Trust approach the County or the Town about having an appraisal performed as soon as possible. The existing farm buildings on the property are in poor condition. Mr. Morton expects to build structures necessary for carrying out a viable agricultural enterprise. One of the terms of the contract of sale must provide Mr. Morton(and his successors)with great latitude regarding the location of bams and other structures necessary for the production of Farm Products as defined in the Agriculture and Markets Law §2. If you have any questions concerning this matter please give me a call. I look forward to hearing from you in the near future. r c rely, Robert S. Hughey/ AUG 0 5 1999 Soa,tlic;ld Town enclosure Flzannir:c� Hoard cc Southold Town Planning Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBER SpFF01,t BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairman =� �� P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J.CREMERS Southold, New York 11971 KENNETH L.EDWARDS W T Fax(516) 765-3136 GEORGERITCHIEIITTCCHHIE WTT,JR. �il� Telephone(516) 765-1938 RICHARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 3, 1999 Robert S. Hughes 316 Front Street P.O. Box 128 Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Orchard Acres (a.k.a. Keith Scott Morton) SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Hughes: The Planning Board reviewed the attached report from James Richter at the Planning Board's August 2nd work session. The Planning Board will be requiring that the restriction noted in the third paragraph of the report be included in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for the subdivision. It is not necessary to submit the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions at this time since the Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the final subdivision maps. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Since Melissa Spiro Senior Planner enc. ��o�gUFFO[,�co � P JEAN W. COCHRAN � JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. 0 : SUPERVISOR 10 �� ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD �Q! �a� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (516)-765-3136 Tel.(516)-765- 1802 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 22, 1999 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road pra � Southold, New York 11971 Re: ORCHARD STREET FARM JUL 2 6 1999 Orchard Street, King Street & Old Farm Road Orient, New York 11957 SCTM #: 1000 - 25 - 04 - 11.4 Southold Town Planning Board Dear Mr. Orlowski As per your request, I have reviewed the plan for the proposed minor subdivision in Orient. This entire site slopes very gradually south toward King Street. Depending on the amount of improvements proposed for each lot, a considerable amount of run-off could be generated and further complicate the existing drainage problems along King Street. The current drainage problems in this area were confirmed by Mr. Jacobs. He has also informed me that his department has recently installed several drainage structures along the shoulder of King Street in an effort to reduce flooding during a heavy rain. At this time, I would recommend a covenant or restriction for each lot within the proposed subdivision. There should be a requirement for each lot to specifically control any run-off generated by any Improvements on the individual lots. This should prevent any additional water from impacting the adjacent street and effectively reduce the amount of run-off that is currently flooding the roadway. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. Sin ly, ames A. Richter, R.A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs (Superintendent of Highways) PLANNING BOARD MEMBA SOff0j/( • BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Q�j Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairman ?� F.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 KENNETH L WILLIAM L. DWAREDWAR DS S ti Fax (516) 765-3136 J. Z GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y O`� Telephone (516) 765-1938 RICHARD G.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 21, 1999 Cynthia Caprise, Secretary Orient Fire District 23300 Main Rd. Orient, NY 11957 Dear Ms. Caprise: (Qeceived bLj PB) Enclosed please find one (1) survey dated W11 15, Iggq for nfGhllyd Stfeft Farm Ca•kg Keith Scott Morton SCTM# 1000- 25 -`t- 11-4 ❑ The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. E( The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recom- mendation at to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Please reply by Ruo - 13 1999. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBES OSUVF0jA, • BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ,rO �G Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairman 'tom P.O. Box 1179 C2 Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J. CREMERS K �✓ Fax(516) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. 1P Telephone (516) 765-1935 RICHARD G.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD jy dol 1919 James Richter Engineering Department Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: �wr� CsEr o� �qRM Tax Map No.: 1000- AS- 4- 11.4 Street Location: Qrclwrc( S}r.€C 1<;Ntir�et Ol �wrn�oc b Hamlet Location: L7r;e..lt Type of Application: ry�'? rereiA 6,1 P.g ero X Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated 7 / 15 /19 ) Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Comments mea 1s 3, 71046e rel), U -GAY h'` ca�raa Contact person: ; CC: Ed Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement PLANNING BOARD MEMBR �g1aFF0J f i CO Gy Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairman BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. _��� P.0. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J. CREMERS y KENNETH L.EDWARDS W Fax (516) 765-3136 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y O`� Telephone(516) 765-1938 RICHARD G.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JU�`I a2� 1999 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities 3. Issues of concern which you believe should b( Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and wa } N �02 oJ`carne Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your res (� Project Name: ac,\,ard 5�ree-k firm e �rocee 8,'�� �.•�� SGQCLA , Requested Action: Im4ln. Ine�n/ tOAS are G�fQ-X. / 5 ac {U � RVntt,b W•I)Nn 1,75 acro any SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (-[) Unlisted Contact Person: &i-55A Sn1420 (516) 765-1938 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( X) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 11/15 Chairman cc: 8eaFd of Appeals Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services * NYSDEC - Stony Brook < NYSDEC - Albany Works low York State Pepakment ef d S 11rm, Cori. of_Fnni�p..�� n r Suffolk County Water Authority "Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 B1/21/19y9 12:51 51647700355 ROBERT S HUGHES PAGE 132 PLANNING BOARD t0Ml• BENNETT ORLOWSRJ,JR, Town Ila U,53096 Mam Rcad Che(rmPni Y.O. Box 1179 MUM J.CREWERs Southold,New York 11971 I ENNETH L.RDWARDa Fax(51(i)7663136 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,7R. Telephoni(516)765-1936 RICHARD O.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD July 20, 1999 Robert S. Hughes, Esq. P O Box 128 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Orchard Acres (a k a. Keith Scott Morton) SCTNW 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Hughes: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 19, 1999: WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision is for 4 lots; and WHEREAS, lot nuMber 1 has been designed as a 13.827 acre lot with a 1.75 acre building envelope; and WHEREAS, the developer is proposing to sell the development rights on the area outside of the 1 75 acre building envelope; and WHEREAS, If the development rights are not offered for sale, the Planning Board will be requiring that an Agricultural Easement be placed on the area outside of the 1.75 acre building envelope; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map which was received by the Planning Board on July 15, 1999. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six nr/ "'i 1 :nr blbarrUibb R(1BER( S HUGHES FACE 63 Papa 2 Prapoaad minor subdmion for Orchard Acraa(a k.a. Keith ecolt Morton) Juty 20, 1999 months of the dale of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The final maps, six (6) paper prints and two (2) mylars must contain a current stamp of Health Department approval and must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. The following Information must be shown on the final maps: 1. Since this is a cluster subdivision, building envelope must be shown for all Iota. 2. The date the map was prepared must be noted, along with any revision dates. The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that it is inadequate in size for a reservation of land for park and playground use. Therefore, a cash payment in lieu of land reservation will be required as per Section Al 06-38(e) of the Town Code. The amount to be deposited with the Town Board shall be $8,000.00 (two thousand dollars per vacant lot in the subdivision). Payment is required prior to any final endorsement of the subdivision. The sketch plans have bean referred to the Town Engineering Inspector, and thr Orient Fire Department for review. You will be notified if the Town Engineering Inspector has any comments and d the Firp Department recommends the Installation of any firewalls. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowstu, Jr rr's Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMB o��gUFFO(,) Co • Town Hall, 53095 Main Road BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� G.f� P.O. Box 1179 Chairman p t CD Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J.CREMERS WDWARDS Fax (516) 765-3136 KENNETH L.ELATHAM Telephone (516) 765-1938 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. � P RICHARD G.WARD y�Ql y_ �a0� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 20, 1999 Robert S. Hughes, Esq. P.O. Box 128 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Proposed minor subdivision for Orchard Acres (a.k.a. Keith Scott Morton) SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Hughes: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 19, 1999: WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision is for 4 lots; and WHEREAS, lot number 1 has been designed as a 13.627 acre lot with a 1.75 acre building envelope; and WHEREAS, the developer is proposing to sell the development rights on the area outside of the 1.75 acre building envelope; and WHEREAS, if the development rights are not offered for sale, the Planning Board will be requiring that an Agricultural Easement be placed on the area outside of the 1.75 acre building envelope; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map which was received by the Planning Board on July 15, 1999. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six Page 2 Proposed minor subdivision for Orchard Acres(a.k.a. Keith Scott Morton) July 20, 1999 months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The final maps, six (6) paper prints and two (2) mylars must contain a current stamp of Health Department approval and must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. The following information must be shown on the final maps: 1. Since this is a cluster subdivision, building envelope must be shown for all lots. 2. The date the map was prepared must be noted, along with any revision dates. The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that it is inadequate in size for a reservation of land for park and playground use. Therefore, a cash payment in lieu of land reservation will be required as per 'Section A106-38(e) of the Town Code. The amount to be deposited with the Town Board shall be $8,000.00 (two thousand dollars per vacant lot in the subdivision). Payment is required prior to any final endorsement of the subdivision. The sketch plans have been referred to the Town Engineering Inspector, and the Orient Fire Department for review. You will be notified if the Town Engineering Inspector has any comments and if the Fire Department recommends the installation of any firewells. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Ste' ROBERT S. HUGHES PB� Aaorney aE l ew 316 F"ne S&eet Telephone (516) 477-2700 P.OBoa 128 F" (516) 477_0955 G,enpo,f, New Fork 11944 July 15, 1999 Ms. Melissa Spiro Senior Planner Southold Town Planning Department G�14 Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold,NY 11971 RE: KEITH SCOTT MORTON SUBDIVISION APPLICATION SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4 BY HAND Dear Melissa, Enclosed is the Southold Town Transactional Disclosure Form for the above referenced parcel. Also enclosed is a check in the amount of Six Hundred($600.00)Dollars. This check represents two distinct payments. 1) Two Hundred($200.00)Dollars is to be allocated to the Subdivision fee as per §A106-21A(1) of the Town Code. This two hundred dollars, in addition to the Two Thousand Eight Hundred($2,800.00)Dollars previously remitted to the Town,totals Three Thousand($3,000.00)Dollars which is the required amount for a four lot subdivision. 2) Four Hundred($400.00)Dollars is to be allocated for the Town's consultant to evaluate the Environmental Assessment Form(EAF). Receipt of these forms and funds, in addition to the accompanying sketch plans,by the Planning Department clears the way for the Planning Board to issue Sketch Plan Approval at its meeting on July 19. As for the Sketch Plan itself you will notice that the building envelope has been reconfigured and the drives have been redesignated as per the Planning Board's instructions on July 12. Thank you very much for your cooperation through this process. t ra j,1 - 1 ghes So!itt'old Town cc: Mr. Anderson �'i' ���;;�,:�;; oar Mr. Morton Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Main Street,P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (516) 537-5160 Fax: (516) 537-5198 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President VIA TELECOPIER AND REGULAR MAIL July t3, 1999 Melissa Speira Southold Town Hall P O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Keith Morton (Orchard Acres) Situate: Orient, Town of Southold SCTM# 1000-25-4-11 .4 Dear Ms. Speira, As promised, transmitted herewith please find one copy of the Long Environmental Assessment Form ("LEAF") for the subdivision referenced above. The original plus two copies are en-route to you via regular mail. As discussed and resolved during the Planning Board work session of July 12, 1999, 1 fully anticipate that the Planning Board will render Sketch Plan approval during their regularly scheduled meeting of July 19, and of course, the purpose of my transmitting to you the LEAF is to give you a leg up on the SEQRA processing of this application . I anticipate Sketch Plan mapping/survey to be completed by Mr. Ehlers sometime tomorrow and 8 copies of the survey will be delivered to you upon receipt of same. Sincerely, Bruce A. Anderson BAA/mis JUL 14 1999 CC] K. Morton Southold Town Planning Board R. Hughes, Esq. FROM :. STROUGH+SUFFOLK FAX NO. : 5165375198 • Ju _.69::21AM P1 cc�� IE �1J/7 [RJUL 1 21999 Suffolk Environmental Consulting, In . D1 If-Ali � Newman Village, Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehantpton, New York 11932-20 &tlob (516) 537-5160 FAX: (516) 537-5198 MS FAX CQYER Date: 7/12/99 Number of pages including cover: 2 To: Southold Town Planning Board Melissa Spera From: Bruce A. Anderson Re: Keith Morton Property Situate: Orient, NY SCTM# 1000-25-4-11,4 As agreed duirng our last informal meeting concerning the property referenced above which took place on. July 9, 1999, transmitted herewith please find a reduced size copy of a Sketch Plan, This Sketch Plan will be the subject of our meeting later today scheduled to take place at 4:30 p.m. in Town Hall. JUL .. ... � 7- c cc: Robert Hughes, Esq Please call us at (516) 537-5160 if there is any problem with this transmission. SKGI'CI-I PLAN 1'Olt KLl Ill Si.U'f'I' MuR'1i)� Snuutc: Oriun1I •1'own of 5uuthold, NY SC-1-My 1000-25-411.4 _-- -- Prepared by Suffolk GuvirunntenW1 Couaultiug, Inc July 12, 1999 { II � 1) i�I �:f �i uurur.uwr..umuwuuuul �` � t tae' s « LW2 11 7w ll-$aCfCS} r ' xy Building envelope +? (1 ucre)it $: ..w—,._ 11 �•.; � 900' n 1 ,`rwurunrn.pupuurl 1 II � r j-, 11 ryan 1�1 I w,cr 11 j h 11 LOi III It (133 acres) ' �y �- Lura i II (1.3 sores) 1t = 1 It It rK�,• F 11�I I Lot 3 It e I 1 1�j pr It Mins st w SCALe: 1/100"=1'-0" ._... Pg mS ROBERT S. HUGHES f apE ey at law 316 Front S6reei Telephone (516) 477-2700 P.O.Box 128 Far 15161477_0955 Ga enport, New Yorir 11944 June 22, 1999 Mr. Bennet Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ' `I BY HAND JUN Z3 byy RE: KEITH SCOTT MORTON SUBDIVISION APPLICATION . Southold Town SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4 Planniog Board Dear Mr. Orlowski, Enclosed is a copy of a letter which I sent to Melissa Spiro on June 15, 1999. This is the same letter which was supposed to be the focus of discussion at the Planning Board's Work Session last night. It is Mr. Morton's position that nothing that was said last night alters the fact that the Planning Board has before it a complete Sketch Plan proposal. The requests made in the letter of June 15 remain and we await the Planning Board's response. This application was Sled on May 25, 1999. Surely it is not unreasonable to expect a written response, as required by §A106-21C of the Southold Town Code within a period of four weeks. Mr. Morton is fully aware that the Planning Department staff has a lot of work to do but we ask that you give this request your attention. As always, I am available to answer any questions which you might have. Thank you for your attention to this matter. . Hugh cc: Mr. Morton ROBERT T S. HUGHES H[lES Afforney of I, w 316 Front Sfreef Te)epbone (516) 477-2700 P.O.Boa 128 F" (516) 477-0955 G. enporf, New fork 11999 June 15, 1999 Ms. Melissa Spiro Senior Planner Southold Town Planning Department Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold,NY 11971 RE: KEITH SCOTT MORTON SUBDIVISION APPLICATION SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4 BY HAND Dear Melissa, This letter is to confine our discussion of Thursday June 10, 1999 at Town Hall. You agreed to write me a letter which laid out the Planning Board's preferences and directions as stated at its Work Session of June 9, 1999. As I said to you, Mr. Morton is willing to work with the Planning Board but he feels that the Planning Board should put its objections and suggestions in writing. To date,we have received no written direction from the Planning Board. This is in spite of meeting with the Board on numerous occasions and submitting all forms and fees required for consideration of a Sketch Plan. In writing your letter would you please address your infrastructure requirements if Mr. Morton opts for the alternative of placing two building lots in the southwest corner of the parcel As I recall, most of the discussion at the Work Session focussed on the idea of locating the lots on the north side with access from Orchard Street. If you have any questions please give me a call. Thank you very much for all of the work you have done on this project. I look forward to your letter so that we can move ahead with the process. Sincerely, Robert S. Hughes �ese lctees were bidem) # 5AII, 'fhe l.Ci, @ 6IAIJ99 woCL- 5P5,5i3N Orient June 20" 1999 A note regarding the signatures on the letter to the Southold Town Planning Board from the neighbors of the former Van Nostrand Farm in Orient: We only learned definitively that you would be considering this item at your meeting today in a telephone call last Friday afternoon, June 18'h. Our letter was not drafted until the night of Saturday June 19 and we did not start collecting signatures until noon on Sunday June 20`h. Despite the extremely limited time available to us, we were able to collect the signatures of every single tenant and proprietor whose land abuts the farm except for the following: 1) Wilhelmine Saint, who recently died, whose property is still in probate, and whose heirs live in Maryland 2) The new owners of the vacant lot, formerly owned by William and Eileen Lenzer, located at the intersection of Orchard Street and Tabor Road. This property is undeveloped and we were unable to reach the new owners. 3)John and Martha Tuthill of 950 Navy Street who were unavailable this past weekend. However we have been assured by their neighbors that, since they have just spent thousands of dollars to build a second story to their house in order to enjoy the farm views, they too would wish to avail themselves of the opportunity to sign this letter, and for this purpose we hope that you will allow them to add their signatures at a later date. We made no special effort to obtain the support of other Orienters whose property is not directly affected. We did not have the time. Nevertheless seven supporting signatures are also appended. We believe this process therefore reflects the unanimity of our opposition and the strength of our feeling. Once again we take this opportunity to urge you to reconsider your recommendations to Mr Scott Morton. U � � Southold Town Planning Board Orient June 19 1999 To the Members of the Southold Town Planning Board: Dear Sirs, We are members of the Orient community whose property directly abuts the former Van Nostrand farm, bordered by Orchard Street, Navy Street, King Street and Old Farm Road. We understand that Mr Keith Scott Morton, who recently purchased the farm, initially presented informal plans to build five houses on the eastern edge of this field. We also understand that, following work sessions and informal meetings of the Planning Board, Mr Scott Morton has been strongly encouraged by you to revise his original plans in order to place these houses along the western and northern perimeters of the field. While we understand that you believe you are acting in the best interests of the community in pushing Mr Scott Morton to revise his plans in this way, and that you hope to thus save us from the negative impact of farming activities, we wish to make clear that we are profoundly opposed to your recommendations. In 35 years of fanning Mr Van Nostrand never received a single complaint about his farming activities from us. There is a simple explanation: we enjoy having the farm views and we appreciate the farming activity since it reinforces the rural way of life which was one of our principle reasons for choosing to live in these properties in the first place. We believe that one explanation for the fact that more and more people are attempting to buy property on the North Fork is because they too wish to be in proximity to farms and the rural life. Instead of looking at a farm, your plans would force us to look into a neighbor's backyard. In so doing we would instantly move from the countryside to the suburbs. indeed we believe that if you succeed in obliging Mr Scott Morton to change his plans you will negatively impact our property values. Beyond this paramount desire to preserve our farm views, we have three other specific concerns. 1) Safety: Of the four roads that surround this farm, the busiest by far is Orchard Street. Yet your preference for the location of the building lots would force most of the new traffic generated by these new houses to enter and exit on Orchard Street. We note, moreover, that the section of Orchard Street between Navy Street and Tabor Road has houses that are occupied year-round by families with a total of 10 children under the age of 8 years, all of whom play in or near the street. In summer time these numbers are swollen by other young children visiting their holiday homes. We greatly fear the effects of the increased traffic. Under Mr Scott Morton's original plan, this traffic would disgorge into Old Farm Road, which is far less busy. Southold Town Planning Board 19 June 1999 Page 3 We, the undersigned, wholeheartedly support and endorse the views expressed in the first two pages of this letter: Fn Q r eWysocki ar 650 Orchard Street Ginette Kumjiah 650 Orchard Street Michael Bogd n Jr. 850 Orchard Street Donald Boe� 0 Orchard Street Judith Ni 1110 Orchard Street �uctd"( tc�— asqual a ma --Penelope Gemma 745 King Street J � Ffoyd F. King Jr. 525 King Street Edward J. right Clare A. Wright 510 Navy Street Gary L. Ta bor Maureen E. Tabor 680 Navy Street iutt�h'Fos 695 Navy Street tom' Haze, SmIth 940 Navy Street 4, hi950 Navy Street bert eeve$/ Marjorie E. Reeves 1180 Navy Street of 7IoM-AS C26- -ATKA AAP� ELLEN CZfLA-TV—A »TKO r.1P01-I 3i Southold Town Planning Board 19 June 1999 Page 2 2) Aesthetics: The most attractive view of this farm is to be had from King Street. As our neighbors walk along King Street they are able to look deep into the southern, northern and western edges of the farm, much of which are screened by beautiful old-growth hardwood trees. Your proposal would shorten and spoil this view. Moreover, of the four borders of the field, the least attractive is the eastern edge, where a number of suburban-style houses, which do not conform to the prevailing Colonial and Victorian architectural styles in the rest of the village, have been built in recent years. Mr Scott Morton has assured us that he will build houses that respect the stylistic integrity of the heart of the village, and in proposing to place them along a little country lane, on the eastern edge of the farm, he would effectively screen-out the houses on Old Farm Road. In other words we believe that placing the houses on the eastern edge of the farm could actually improve the view. 3) Farming: We note that the best and most productive land on the farm is located at its western edge. Indeed that is the only part of the farm that is currently under cultivation. We understand that an expert from the Cornell Extension has testified that the quality of the land varies little from one part of the field to another. But to contradict this you have the testimony of Mr Robert Van Nostrand who has farmed the field for the last 35 years and who knows it better than anyone else alive. We believe you should defer to Mr Van Nostrand's expertise in this regard. And, in considering the development of this farm, we believe you should do your outmost to preserve the most productive part of it. In conclusion, we wish to reiterate that while we are grateful for your efforts to help preserve the interests of our community, in this one instance we believe you may not have had all the information you need about our wishes. We are confident that you will take our views into account and reverse your recent recommendations to Mr Scott Morton. urs, ony Jenkins Jayne Tsuchi ama 530 Orchard Street Robert W. Sorenson Raeliel Sorenson 370 Orchard Street �✓�` ( J - - Southold Town Planning Board 19 June 1999 Page 4 Although our property does not directly abut the old Van Nostrand farm, we live in close proximity to it and we too fully endorse the views expressed in the first two pages of this letter: I Troy Gu to son Joan Gustayson King Street ST 41 /17,6jr2 �d lheod oft a - p►��1� �� _ Southold Town Planning Board 19 June 1999 Page 2 2)Aesthetics: The most attractive view of this farm is to be had from King Street. As our neighbors walk along King Street they are able to look deep into the southern, northern and western edges of the farm, much of which are screened by beautiful old-growth hardwood trees. Your proposal would shorten and spoil this view. Moreover, of the four borders of the field, the least attractive is the eastern edge, where a number of suburban-style houses, which do not conform to the prevailing Colonial and Victorian architectural styles in the rest of the village, have been built in recent years. Mr Scott Morton has assured us that he will build houses that respect the stylistic integrity of the heart of the village, and in proposing to place them along a little country lane, on the eastern edge of the farm, he would effectively screen-out the houses on Old Farm Road. In other words we believe that placing the houses on the eastern edge of the farm could actually improve the view. ` . 3) Farming: We note that the best and most productive land on the farm is located at its western edge. Indeed that is the only part of the farm that is currently under cultivation. We understand that an expert from the Cornell Extension has testified that the quality of the land varies little from one part of the field to another. But to contradict this you have the testimony of Mr Robert Van Nostrand who has farmed the field for the last 35 years and who knows it better than anyone else alive. We believe you should defer to Mr Van Nostrand's expertise in this regard. And, in considering the development of this farm, we believe you should do your outmost to preserve the most productive part of it. In conclusion, we wish to reiterate that while we are grateful for your efforts to help preserve the interests of our community, in this one instance we believe you may not have had all the information you need about our wishes. We are confident that you will take our views into account and reverse your recent recommendations to Mr Scott Morton. Yours, J) v Aj Anthony Jenkins V Jayne Tsuchiyama 530 Orchar-d Street Robert W. Sorenson Rachel Sorenson 370 Orchard Street Judith Nigro 1110 Orchard Street Orient June 20 1999 To the members of the Southold Town Planning Board: Dear Sirs, I write to express my wholehearted support for most of the contents of the letter to you, dated June 19"', from my neighbors whose property abuts the old Van Nostrand farm. Like them I am profoundly opposed to any effort to block my farm views and to permit a house to be placed behind my property in order to be "buffered" from farming activity. I have no need or desire to be "protected" from farming activities . On the contrary I bought this house - which is the old Tabor farmhouse- and have owned and enjoyed it for the last 21 years, precisely because it looked onto a farm. The idea that I might not be able to retain my farm view is deeply painful to me . I have never complained about farming activity. Like my neighbors, I too am deeply concerned about the danger of increased traffic on Orchard Street . I too believe your efforts to locate the new houses along the northern and western borders of the farm would be aesthetically disastrous for the village of Orient as a whole . And I too am anxious to see the best farmland preserved. Where I differ from my neighbors is endorsing the eastern end of the farm as the preferred location for these proposed new houses . This is for an obvious reason; such a development would still effectively block my farm views . Instead I would urge you to place these houses along King Street and the southernmost stretch of Old Farm Road where they would, in effect, follow the existing pattern of housing in the village. Better yet, I would hope that you could encourage the town to find a way to purchase these development rights so that fewer houses would need to be built on this precious property, the only remaining farm in the historic core of Orient . I urge you in the strongest possible terms to consult the neighbors to this proposed development, before you make any further efforts to pressure Mr Scott Morton and I hope you give full weight to our concerns . Y rs, udith Nigro Donald Boerum 1000 Orchard Street Orient June 21 1999 Southold Town Planning Board Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Rd. Southold 11971 Dear Sirs, I wish to inform you that Mr Keith Scott Morton has asked me, on more than one occasion, to sell him a right of way through my property to facilitate the planning permits and future sale of a buildable lot to be located directly behind (and to the south) of my property. I understand that the Planning Board has been pressing Mr Scott Morton to place this lot contiguous with my property and that he, and perhaps some members of the Board, are laboring under the misapprehension that I may be persuaded to sell him the right of way he needs for a driveway to access this lot. I want to make clear to you that I have refused to entertain Mr Scott Morton's proposal and I will not change my mind on this matter. Indeed I am instructing my attorney to insert a covenant into my property deed to ensure that no such right of way will ever be granted to Mr Scott Morton or any future owner of the property behind my house. The effort to place a building lot behind my house is a misbegotten scheme and I will do everything in my power to block it. Your , 0 Donald Boerum ROBERT ERT S. HUGHES H[lES AEEorney aE Law 516 Front Street Te%p]Lone (516) 477-2700 P.®.Boa 128 Fax (516) 477_0955 Greenport, New York 11944 June 15, 1999 Ms. Melissa Spiro Senior Planner D ? a n Southold Town Planning Department (AV I'�JII Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 JUN 15 1999 RE: KEITH SCOTT MORTON SUBDWLSION APPLICATION Southold Town SCTM # 1000-25-4-11.4 Planning Board BY HAND Dear Melissa, This letter is to confirm our discussion of Thursday June 10, 1999 at Town Hall. You agreed to write me a letter which laid out the Planning Board's preferences and directions as stated at its Work Session of June 9, 1999. As I said to you, Mr. Morton is willing to work with the Planning Board but he feels that the Planning Board should put its objections and suggestions in writing. To date, we have received no written direction from the Planning Board. This is in spite of meeting with the Board on numerous occasions and submitting all forms and fees required for consideration of a Sketch Plan. In writing your letter would you please address your infrastructure requirements if Mr. Morton opts for the alternative of placing two building lots in the southwest comer of the parcel. As I recall, most of the discussion at the Work Session focussed on the idea of locating the lots on the north side with access from Orchard Street. If you have any questions please give me a call. Thank you very much for all of the work you have done on this project. I look forward to your letter so that we can move ahead with the process. iuo�y� • .mss ]ROBERT S. HUGu1f I ES Attornr-y At Law 316 F"nt Street 7rei p6onr 4' 160 477-2700 P®.Boa 128 1'H. 05,7x,0 477-09,55 Gmenport, New York 11944 May 25, 1999 Ms. Melissa Spiro Senior Planner Southold Town planning Department Southold Town Hall Chat Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 In iLUWv RE: KEITH SCOTT MORTON SUBDIVISION APPLICATION SCTM # 1000-25-4-11.4 BY HAND Dear Melissa, In regard to the above-referenced parcel of land, situated in Orient, please accept this submission of twelve(12) copies of a sketch plan and other documents required to initiat- the Subdivision process in Southold Town. As you can see from the documents, Mr. Morton has designated me as his representative before the Town of Southold. I am available at your convenience to discuss this application and to provide you with whatever other information you may need. I look forward to beano l- don:you in the near future. Thank you very much for your consideration. cerely �� MAY 2 5 1999 so,th o TOWrl plzo,t)ing i3oard • ROBERT S. HUGHES A&ar ey at L*w 516 Finn(Sore( Telephone (516) 477-2700 P.O.Box 128 'i,B review e,c \eft 2 Fax (516) 477_0955 G"enpor(, New g'A 11944 Ca� 5)a 199 work SeSS i W . �Y g, cQec(�ed nt3� -tE- camrnen� May 7, 1999 on \e�e2 vn W' rev�sec� Mr. Bennet Orlowski rnaes Sub m t i�< . Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 /V\ S 1I1� 1 U IJJJ RE: Proposed Subdivision for"Van Nostrand Farm", Orient. SCTM# 1000- 25 - 4- 11.4 Southold Town =Planning Board Dear Mr. Orlowski, The purpose of this letter is to confirm the decision of the Planning Board at its Work Session on May 3, 1999. The Board voted against Mr. Morton's proposal to place the building lots on the East and North sides of the parcel. Instead,the Board wants the building lots to be located on the West and North. This will mean that at least some of the lots will be reached from King Street instead of Old Farm Road. In light of the Board's decision, Mr. Morton has instructed me and the surveyors to draw up a new proposal. This proposal will be submitted to the Board in a few weeks. At this time Mr. Morton's primary concern is that the Board will maintain its position even if the neighbors object. We trust that you will use all of your persuasive powers to blunt any community opposition. I also want to take this opportunity to thank you and all of the members of the Board and the staff of the Planning Department for their help and thoughts regarding this project. I look forward to your continued help and input as this project progresses. This piece of property is very important to the Hamlet of Orient and we all have a great responsibility to make a success out of it. Sine r Obert S. Hu • P� �"ZS ROBERT S. HUGHES fl_i&o eyaELaw 3716 F"nt Sereet Telephone (516) 477_2700 P.O.Bor 128 Fax (516) 477-0955 Greenport, New York 11999 May 7, 1999 Mr. Bennet Orlowski Planning Board Southold Town Hall c' 53095 Main Road s F Southold, New York 11971 ie RE: Proposed Subdivision for `Ran Nostrand Farm", Orient. SCTM# 1000- 25 - 4- 11.4 1 jOuthold Town Dear Mr. Orlowski, °iaiuoing Board The purpose of this letter is to confirm the decision of the Planning Board at its Work Session on May 3, 1999. The Board voted against Mr. Morton's proposal to place the building lots on the East and North sides of the parcel. Instead, the Board wants the building lots to be located on the West and North. This will mean that at least some of the lots will be reached from King Street instead of Old Farm Road. In light of the Board's decision, Mr. Morton has instructed me and the surveyors to draw up a new proposal. This proposal will be submitted to the Board in a few weeks. At this time Mr. Morton's primary concern is that the Board will maintain its position e,,en irthe neighbors object. We trust that you will use all of your persuasive powers to blunt any community opposition. I also want to take this opportunity to thank you and all of the members of the Board and the staff of the Planning Department for their help and thoughts regarding this project. I look forward to your continued help and input as this project progresses. This piece of property is very important to the Hamlet of Orient and we all have a great responsibility to make a success out of it. Sin e ly, / obert S. Hu P'1s� ROBERT S. RUGINES Attorney at Law 316 Front 5tr ei Telephone (516)4772700 P.O.Boa 128 Faa (516) 477-0955 Greenport, New t'orh 11944 April 21, 1999 Ms. Melissa Spiro Senior Planner Southold Town planning Department Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 RE: KEITH SCOTT MORTON SUBDIVISION APPLICATION SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4 BY HAND Dear Melissa, Enclosed you will find a Yield Map and a Preliminary Subdivision Sketch for the above- referenced project. Kindly place these maps and the project on the agenda for the Planning Board's Work Session scheduled for April 26, 1999. I plan to attend so that I may explain to the Board our preference for locating the lots. If there is anything else you need from me please give me a call. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Ce�lyA t�-1 tl 5�3\90. wo2k SeSSio(N . \&e Ce Q"'q1en w'�tl. 1 ols «, �e nor h, APR 2 2 1999 cc: Keith Morton Bruce Anderson u ftk 1,e \e-ts\- aw•o rt— Southold Town &Y\ ry nPlanning Board s 13) b "9,SCvi`i �`S f+�1N( �pry� WI l e� �I e)uy\et?. ms ROBERT S. HUGHES Attorney at Law 316 Front Street Telephone (51 6)477-2700 FO.Bos 128 F" (.516)477-0955 Gmenport, A7ew Yorl, 11944 April 21, 1999 Ms. Melissa Spiro Senior Planner Southold Town planning Department Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 RE: KEITH SCOTT MORTON SUBDIVISION APPLICATION SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4 BY HAND Dear Melissa, Enclosed you will find a Yield Map and a Preliminary Subdivision Sketch for the above- referenced project. Kindly place these maps and the project on the agenda for the Planning Board's Work Session scheduled for April 26, 1999. I plan to attend so that I may explain to the Board our preference for locating the lots. If there is anything else you need from me please give me a call. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Ce�I (� 5s cc: Keith Morton APR 2 2 1999 Bruce Anderson Southold Town Planning Board F'NL?.:F :Ci, 51t : <1`_ 1 Npr, ro- 1`+T -F'f`1 F � U t;nited State- 1)epartment ofUSDA Room N-210Agriculture 300 Center Drive, Riverhead County Center amRiverhead, New York 11901 Natural Resources Conservation Service April 6, 1999 Ms. Melissa Spiro Senior Planner FILE COPY Southold Town Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Dear Melissa: I have reviewed the information forwarded to me regarding the Morton property and made a site visit on March 31, 1999. The entire parcel has few if any limitations for fanning. The so'_1 is mapped Haven Loam, the topography is flat to gently rolling and is considered privie agricultural land. While inspecting the site. I did notice that the soil was somewhat stony in the northeast and southwest 'orners of the property. The irrigation well is located along the west side of the property as shown on the attached trap. There is also a well in the southwest corner of the property. Based upon these observations, it appears that the layout with the lots located in the northeast corner of the property (layout A) would be best suited to this site. This would maintain a contiguous block of farmland with access to the existing well for irrigation purposes. If you have any questions or need filrther information, give me a call. Sincerely, j7 D Allan S. Connell ppR 7 b99 District Conservationist Southold Town cc: Bruce Anderson Planning Board TI cl Ll OF I LOT 2 1.5 ACRE 1.25 ACRE �4ff 3� 1.25:ACRE 12 ACRE 1074, Ll 1.25 jc!j?f lay. SUFNEY OF PFIOPERJv SRUATE r4� TOY^OF SOL"OLO SU FOLS OOLNTY,TTe jomx n J� CL hn.ung PLANNING BOARD MEMBER* SpFF014, �0 C� • Town Hall, 53095 Main Road BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. =.2� l/y� P.O. Box 1179 Chairman p Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J. CREMERS y = Fax (516) 765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDSLATHAM Oy �yC Telephone(516) 765-1935 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. O RICHARD G.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 24, 1999 Allan Connell District Conservationist USDA, NRCS Riverhead County Center 300 Center Drive, Room N-210 Riverhead, New York 11901-33988 RE: Keith Morton Property (a.k.a. Van Nostrand Property) North side King Street/ west side Old Farm Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.4 Dear Mr. Connell: The Planning Board has received an inquiry in regard to subdividing the above mentioned property. The Planning Board held a pre-submission conference on March 15, 1999, with Bob Hughes, attorney for the owner, and Bruce Anderson, agent for the owner, in regard to the subdivision. The applicant is proposing a cluster design with a total of 5 lots. Four of the 5 proposed lots range in size from 1.25 to 1.5 acres. The fifth lot, which is approximately 12 acres in area, is proposed as including one building envelope (the building envelope is not shown on the proposed layout.) The applicant submitted two different cluster design options for the Planning Board's review. The total area of the property is approximately 17.25 acres, and it is located in the R-80 Zoning District. Since the subject parcel contains viable farmland, the Planning Board would appreciate your recommendations in regard the potential subdivision of the property. I thank you in advance for your assistance. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely el/i Spir Senior Planndfr enc. cc: Bruce Anderson ws ROBERT S. HUGHES Attorney st I. w 316 Front Street Telephone (516) 477_2700 P.®.Boa 128 Fer (516)477-0955 Greenport, New York 11944 March 2, 1999 Ms. Melissa Spiro Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 BY HAND RE: Proposed Subdivision for "Van Nostrand Farm", Orient. SCTM# 1000 - 25 - 4 - 11.4 Dear Melissa, As per our telephone conversation this morning, enclosed you will find two proposals for subdividing the above-referenced parcel. Please place this project on the agenda of the Planning Board's work session scheduled for March 8, 1999. Please understand that these two proposals are extremely preliminary. The general idea is to subdivide the land in such a manner that there will still be a viable farm lot of at least 10 acres. I do not expect my presentation to the Board to take more than a few minutes. Thank you for your help and if you have any questions please feel free to call me. Thank you for your cooperation. Si 6 1/[ b Rel Iughm P1�►t 0 2 1999 ' enclosures &satxholti Tam a4r,nirV barer LASER FICHE FORM SCANNED SUBDIVISIONS YAR 2 0 2007 Records Management Pro}ect Type: Minor Status: Expired SCTM # : 1000 r 25.4-11.4 Proiect Name: (Morton. Keith Scott - Exp. Location: n/w comer of King Street & Old Farm Road & the s/s/o Orchard Street in Orient Hamlet: Orient Applicant Name: Keith Scott Morton Owner Name: Keith Scott Morton Zone 1: R-80 Approval Date: Nh'"r PLAT Signed Date: NIA OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date Indicates that we have received the related information Zone 2: Zone 3: Cand R's : Homeowners Association R and M Agreement: Address: County Filing Date: SCAN Date: �IJ�a rT SUBDIVISION MAP — Street - - - - N orchmd � o e NBT'40'40'F � e W E "ORCHARD STREET FARM" E st, 3150 EQ maw - �— 1° '' \ S l0 E Tpr 6 - °N AT ORIENT o ° N OE oFU c?'� aN L TOWN OF SOUTHOLD i° 1 • — czT � jab >3 N SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Lan °rmerly 04 I Q 6—'31a N N q}l N — S d now °r 589.42'20• O \ Kobcrt IN Sorenson N83•500 7.49'00'E 1221 m 105.11' y ,` 'r`r 201 , Ste, / Ss 7$ SUFFOLK COUNC E TY TAX MAP NUMBER 9 Nlo NeTao'aa°E 55x41='°°a 1000-25-4-11.6 D D - \ I_anG��w°�aweerlyroi O II \ NOTES: JAN 2 2 2004oL SGHOOL DISTRICT #2 Na- f-40 SITE / ��— - '40E 219.72 OO FIRE DIS #25 SsuthaldTswa TRICT Planning Board c ,°. N Sono OWNER APPLIGANT Land now for If ai hnrr - KEITH SGOTT MORTON Ann WO` o 25 EA5T 86th 5T. NEW YORK, NY 10028 =.1( 3ulld�ng area "a — over Loh I Are, = S BT,II£s sf Ic^ TexR.•1 31422'. NOTES: mw °,- formerly of or 2 00 Acres N07.40'40•E AREA MAP H EIIM, N CALE "=600' I PROPERTY ZONED A5 R-80 LPnFrrw: d wlte 5 9 I°= 9 TOTAL AREA = 675,695 5F OR 15.51 AGRE5 --^ t y 11 h TYFIGAL PLO's FLAN MAP AMENDMENT5: Test -toles by: Sea Level Mapping \ n Land now or formery of r N dated. 2/17/01 not to scgle DECEMBER 9, 2003, JAN. 15, 2004 Roger 7 FosLcr, �r 1: 564.4B20^I/y 27417' _ _ _ m Lot t+l = 12 51 Acres \o - - - - or 544,966 sf Test Hole # I Test Hole 4 2 C ro =(10.51 Acres excluding el 1 15' el Ib O' 1 EV ROA® _\ p 1 / I Building area) aa — cc x + l - I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WATER 5UPPLY(5) AND/OR 5EKI DISPOSAL 5Y5TEM(5) cl a' ^ p m w FOR THIS PROJECT WERE DE516NED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION. BASED UPON A " '9 46"E FH N 559°54' 221.42' pi m CAREFUL AND THOROWH STUDY OF THE SOIL, 517E AND 6Rg1ND WATER CONDITIONS, ALL P,e clan a w LOTS, A5 PROPOSED, CONFORM TO THE 5UFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES 6a�;"pei°sioxs ol° pry QQ CON5TRUCTION 5TANDARD5 IN EFFECT A5 OF THI5 DATE. Or formerly am Land wry L 0" Tabor o a Q Q "84.48'2E 21508' Fo- R` house ,ureen F labor :z.` a°°^ Gu1LI"aSed F1elds WELL DETAIL , G ------------------- -- - m n n oN n O t to S G G L� JOSC-Ri FISGHETTI P.E. DATE � 0 N p 1� N LL \ °p~ x I^later tight seal _ O Lot q,5 V well :n6lollatl on pll less volt IT, e Lot a2 W Area = 65,350 sf 12 l Area = 65,379 5ff v or 1.50 Acres N el 30' e" 5 ".mr le "ater el 3.0' FINISHEn GRAfJE or 1 50 Acres ° sr UF UF crn°na 9 rbu m , / ° N n ier e�e=en U nu e a J / DN6 ormerly of. .� \ I a era°el sraxel Land now °r fWrlghL 5 ° e/ e2 eALLaN 4'-6 ' min Edw,rd II N z ev G',alre A. Wnght srFFAA, ° \ TANK I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH15 MAP WA5 MADE BY U5 FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED NOVEMBER 1995 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS 5HOWN THUS:■ �`'- N HEREON ACTUALLY EX15T AND THEIR P05ITION5 GORRECTLY SHONW AND Of D 3 ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT. Or tiln n Lry \ OU NOT TO 5G6,LE eROIINo AATER z n Lancip"oG bleI tB2.667 \ Nis°262 SEPT IG SYSTEM DETAIL - and n a�w Q 'kS ."a' .\ 4h' FOR 4 NOT OO'M RE51pENGL , L OF NE1nj O --- -------------- � °s. rER " In •Q� HN G. EHLERS N.Y.-L5. LIG 50202 or formed �' WZ S e.t�tewlnb Y oFO - � �'V'dEL_ SGRF_F_N ` res AN3' CAST IRON FRAMSUBMERSIBLE k O covERE To GRADE PUMP e'N N \ 5 PALLON5 WELL NATER 5VPPLY NOTES ' 9 6" FLAT CONCRETE COVER \ 0 pro GRADE FOR INDIVIDUAL LOTS WHERE THE SALTWATER INTERFACE 15 ENGOUNI-ERED LE55 THAN 40 FEET BELOW THE WATER rh`U 0 O _ TABLE THE NELL SGREEN MAY BE INS rALLED AT A FnNIN F ry iMxen SHALLOWER DEPTH PROVIDED THAT THE TOP OF TI IS WELL gLANDS� �o o q PER FOOT — 113, SCREEN 15 AT LEAST lO FEET FELON THE NATER TABLE "ETMGvr^Imd MINIMUM p1T6H AND THE HORIZONTAL 5EPARATION BETWEEN THE WELL AND ♦""A 116"PER poor ALL LEACHING POOLS I5 AT LEAST 159 FEET MIN PIPE —g ��, 'L MINIMUDDI PITC, ...MR i MIN,4" IA PIPE StreetI MIN ,y �j DA P 1000 GALLONMINIMUM rP', MONOLITHIC 3 . SIDE WALL EEPTIC TANK Nam > AREAa Unau[n^r lice el[eraO°n o n- a M."U, GA< 6' erpecrlve �I%, e oear,n9 a cen=_ ° la %I:, o 1 Depm ^amac,°n nr eer t,n A. ° - neo. nr the SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTNIIENIT OF HEALTH SERVICES Ne. T°". 11—°�°�°at,nn ta, Hauppauge,New York ZN "a ° 6sNn�ANamv -1— .r the HORlOT�LA0ERe ' or,e,na] nr nicv EACKPILL WITH CLEAN MATERIAL V1, ? marked oath m o�,g,wl n n lan0 sonic or'e 13'MINIMUM 3EPASATIDV FROM st°:Vetl seal shall oe sons,errrpeto ne °aL[I Lrue TH1515 TO CBAIFY THAT THIS` WN1510N FLAT W5 BN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING ILII u HIGH 6ROuv AATER rnnlee BOARD OF THE TOYdI OF 511RYIL19 BY Rt`.rOLUTION DAT67, car\,r,ra,Anne ne,eateu ne This is to certify that tile 5EA50NAL HIGH proposed Realty Subdivision or Development GROUND HATER —may ae nreoareo l u,t,^�Itete.9 for in the a�oec r vrartmanv enteo with a total of lots was DATE: approved on the above date.Water Supplies and Sewage Disposal ehaham5 Squire taov ormeM°ra�I. dale 4.mne^.n�js�,� 09 reo�e,�,ena, Facilities must conform to construction standards in effect at the time of I'evar, art llrrl.,n hell r mnGv rev l construction and are subject to separate permits pursuant to those standards. This approval shall be valid only if the realty ej n lee o,nge^-U lLnro,s[Pu n9°°er en subdivision/development map is duly filed with the County Clerk within to then e,ereee a ne nr exeeen°ane nxners t,nnean et trane°araxlent °,tonnav : ,Hoene one year of this date.Consent is hereby given for the filing of ibis map on which this endorsement appears in the Office of the County Clerk in ��..��1r EHL �[`/T V accordance with provisions of the Public Health Law and the Suffolk SANITARY SYSTEM DESIGNED BY:ETTI, PE JOHN C. EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR E Y OR County Sanitary Code. 1729 HOBARTPH HROAD V1T0 A.MEVEI P.E. GRAPHIC SCALE t "=loo ' B5OUTHOLD, NN4Y 111171 6EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S. LIC. "0. 50202 Director,Division of Environmental Quality 11 11 0 100 200 300 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 — — 369-8288 Fax 369-8287 \\Hp server\d\98-267.pro\MORT_SUB-2004-13.pro ,/15/2009 Ib23AM \\H 5 ver\a\90-267 ro\MORT_bUD-2004_8 r PREL I MNARY SUBDIVISION SKETCH SITUATE : ORIENT ppR 22 0999 9, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 5outnoldTOwn SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY planning Board DRAFTED 04-15-qq —DrC/q FT 5UFFOLK COUNTY TAX # 1000 - 25 - 4 - 11.4 APPLICANT: KEITH SCOTT MORTON Orchard Street Nal 14 '40"E 50.00' T T" 2 mo mUpc a fl 0 �� A°.!; : ❑ o o ° 040 40 ° La Robert W. 5omanean F: I . N8 :E -14.68 5°�,OO587°4q'00"E 122.00' 4,0 -•-° I ,'''-'i, G anq O 58q°42'20"E 105.11' Green Hoo» N❑ 40::� 6q.0 Eileen Len2enlery 44], 12.3' 126.81' / d t NBII°40'40"E 300.00' ----------- N86°55'10"E N or farmerl406, - - - 7//� - - - _ _ Land now eves: ]] j;', ,".+r,.,. ,..'r•,. - RobertG. Re 200' MarJorle E. ReavesI �w ..• " .``,.i . G'U��, I N @ I u Lot # I I stk A at S6 rea = I '�-T°�' � � . I 50' I 42:20„ yo 1 .15 ACI-05 F 436 _ I I I �0 ° � � I I Lot # 2 � I 1 I bUll iq envelope Area = sat I _ _ _ R 40 Zoning _ - II _ I 1 .66 Acres / Land now or Formerly GFR I '50, Ann N. Latham 1 50' I � I _I buildingewelo e I '" r'•'- - - - - R-eZoning _ - - - - - - - I I ,q envalaP° r. "erI4 OF! Land", r Smith,Sr- Lot #3 I I � Area = 12 .31 Acres 50 I Lot # 3 50, - Areo OF: - -� _ L Roger T rfa"terrl5r. _ - r _ - _ `p - f .. ." �. a ry I m I I envelope 'I • f 2a � c .•, t� �_a a F'rpne �Il�i1d5 111 l i'.� .;':1, j� 6°ildmg U� GUIt1VGted , - - envelope � I WpQr� yonln9 I • O I i 11 U ,7• I I or Formerly 0 an now L.Tabor 4 1 ,1 Maureen E.Tabor fw. I Lot # 4 ' I p4W I Area = 1 .20 Acre5 T � I ils 1 I niJ.( f.•','}'nj3 Wnd fwd F ir,®t y4 F. Edwar �q'h '. Claire A. �(ght I ^ . Land now or Forme9 °F plpa I Floyd F.Kingt,rust sot I I ;1..; _ Revocable T N81° B�. I'O•' _ ' t'' 00 02'00 - - 1 61dg. 162.17' � f� _ ;:p.;• ,h�' !�� 0 0 N JV Land noW' formerly of: O °P'•• g. nN ,Oryx �m N8o°52' ��--` �" 346.57' 19 Sir 3E hP�o G EHE O yar. Ill MONUMENT FOUND * & ` ~ •• tt- 0 PIPE FOUND 'F o. ozoz yF;cY Nw:'u'F - HEDGE tires "nF .i .,. G':.'°'�J,.'GF:'R'.5=2I—, ... . TOTAL AREA = I'f.59 A6RE5 - JOHN C. EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR 6 EAST MAIN S'1RFW N.Y.S.UC NO.50202 RPAMHEAAN.Y.11901 GRAPHIG 5GALE 1"= 50' 369-8285 Fn 36944 REp W%JOSM98-26.7P a YIELD M,4P __ SITUATE: ORIENT APR 2 �' 1999 - r TOWN OF 5OUTHOLD N SUFFOLK GOUNTY,pNY DRAFTED 04-I5-99 ��✓ / T I `A' E e C SUFFOLK GOUNTY TAX # VY 1000 - 25 - 4 - 11.4 S APPL IGANT: KEITH 5GOTT MORTON Orchard Street Nb-l'I4Q'40'E 50-00' Tp s • j - 05 ._ ` ES 6 6 �■ 9 N ui y � O � 9 Lcb LLE `ham G; � '� NO D � 07 O49 L 0_ p Oc „ • —E _ n °° 969 '" N To �c 66 6 0 L9 pi � 03 p0 �sA S ,• Land now Or Formerly of N _ ° e VL Sorenson a Rabrt ,06+E '14b6 567.44'00•E 122- - -pi — 1 Lone _k 60=a 5M@42'20'E 105.11' r e G �reen Housz �' to .. - ., er 6q 6/le n� Lae^n>e 12 stk aa7 �6•fjQ' set on Leh -- _ NBtj'5510'E 126-01' N6"I 404(TE 500-00' X Land now or Formerlq of oo -Ie1�5 �, Rezves, r ¢ Robert ves e ,�II _ e U hlar)orle E R � �iU1t1�/O�te N N Frame '- pato stk Gam_ Lot # et o5.4�r f Arco = BI ,Oa3 5 . . g X43 C) zet o 7 }] G #g r ' Lot � b05 Land Ann or Lathamy of ArPia 4 Q Lot #2 Area = 80,542 5 .f . Land nowor formerly of Arhtur H. 5mlth, sr. D FS g wife I I ----------- 270' LOnd naw or Formerly of �jl Roger T. Foster, 5r (�y _ � lY1 Lot #5 Aroo f ,Bid y a° a e Frai ana'W Lot Area 0v Land now or Formerly of. Gary L Tnbor M1 lJl -at #4 FlaureenE Tabor p4W O Area = X15,4/02 5 .f . j now Or FOrmerly Lo EdPlard -I �NlrlghhtM1 Glalre A 9 / Lot #ro Ar-00 IF Land now or Formerly of'. / Floyd E Klnq' JF rust pipe Revocable TT '� o:bg.l os _ __ et N81.02'g0 /\ °(N Frame Bldg 16�.1T �1� endnaiy ar Far Area Gemma merly oF. •� N i P--... - �2 Kmg Street s£ NOTE5� I ' ■ MONUMENT FOUND .e.......... O PIPE FOUND HEDGE TOTAL AREA = 1T.59 ACRES ^�„ oan^ ��� JOHN C. EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR 6RAPHIG 5GALE I.,= 506 EAST MAP]STREET N.Y.S.LIC.NO.50202 RIVERHEADN.Y. 11901 369-8288 Fax 369-8287 ABP.D:UO13S198-267C