HomeMy WebLinkAboutOregon Road Recycling-Full Environmental Assessment Form 1991
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART 3
OREGON ROAD RECYCLING
OREGON ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK
Prepared for: Mr. & Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Prepared by: H2M Group
575 Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747
SO\J,.1~~S
\'I" .
...-......-. .
OCTOBER 1991
ti~MGROUP
HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL. P.C.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS . ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . SCIENTISTS . SURVEYORS
MELVillE, N.Y. TOTOWA, N.J.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART 3
OREGON ROAD RECYCLING
OREGON ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK
Prepared for: Mr. & Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Prepared by: H2M Group
575 Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747
OCTOBER 1991
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ti~GROUP
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART 3
OREGON ROAD RECYCLING INC.
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK
Proposed Action:
Action involves the addition of solid waste recy-
cling facilities to accommodate construction and
demolition debris, automobiles, landscaping yard
waste and trash. Proposed facilities include a
concrete/asphalt crusher and a concrete automobile
crushing pad to be added to the existing excavation
and drainage facility on site.
Location:
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
Town of Southold
SCTH #1000-83-03-4.5
Applicant:
Mr. & Mrs. D. Grim
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Lead Agency:
Planning Board
Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Contact:
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
f'reparer:
Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C.
575 Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747
Contact:
Andrew P. Freleng, AICP
Date of Preparation: October 28, 1991
Availability of Document: The pages which follow constitute Part 3 of
the Full Environmental Assessment Form submitted by the appli-
cant to the Town of Southold, 12/11/90. Copies are available
for public review and comment at the office of the Lead
Agency. Comments should be submi tted to the Lead Agency
listed above to be included in the public record.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~GROUP
Pursuant to correspondence received by the Applicant from
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman of the Planning Board of the
Town of Southold, this Part 3 of the Full Environmental
Assessment Form is herewith submitted. As directed, all items
enumerated in correspondence to the Planning Board from the
Board's consultant, Cramer, Voorhis and Associates (CVA), have
been addressed in this Part 3 submittal. Appendix A of this
Part 3 includes correspondence from the Planning Board and
their consultant.
The proposed action is the addition of solid waste recy-
cling facilities to accommodate construction and demolition
debris, automobiles, landscaping yard waste and trash. Pro-
posed facilities include a concrete/asphalt crusher, a con-
crete automobile crushing pad, a hazardous waste storage
building, solid waste sorting building and trucking to be
added to the existing excavation and drainage facilities on
site.
1.0 Site Plan
It was requested that the applicant provide a detailed
site plan indicating the location of all proposed structural
site improvements. A plan has been submitted, dated February
1, 1990, which was stamped received by the Planning Board July
22, 1991, and forwarded to the Board's consultant, Cramer,
Voorhis and Associates, subsequent to the consultant's letter
-1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t-UMGROUP
requesting this item.
2.0 Noise
Concern was raised about the impact to adjacent proper-
ties from noise levels associated with equipment operation at
the subject site. The subject parcel has been characterized
by the Town's environmental consultant as being situated in an
industrial area east from the site to Cox Lane, west from the
site to Depot Lane and south to North Road. North of the sub-
ject parcel, opposite Oregon Road, is Residential zoning.
Intermittent industrial uses are dispersed throughout the
area. Most significant is the Southold Town Landfill south of
project site. Between the landfill and the southern reaches
of the subject parcel is the truck yard for North Fork Sanita-
tion. This 5.1 acre parcel both shields the subject site from
the noise of the landfill and creates its own noise from truck
movements during its hours of operation.
Existing ambient noise sources consist of equipment
activity at the landfill, the present soil screening plant in
use on the subject site, as well as noise from truck and pas-
senger motor traffic on Oregon Road. Irrigation pumps from
surrounding land uses also contribute to the ambient noise.
Fly-bys of crop spraying planes and helicopters intermittently
contribute to the ambient noise in the area of the subject
parcel.
-2-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t-UMGROUP
Ambient noise in the area of a landfill/industrial area
can range 40-90 decibels (dB), dependent upon the time of day
and distance to equipment, moving trucks and other vehicles
(McLean, 1988; Stanton, 1987; Warren, 1985). Ambient noise is
a function of distance as well. Sound propagation from source
to receiver can be attenuated by the properties of the atmo-
sphere and the presence of any objects or barriers in the
transmission path, such as vegetation, change in topography,
buildings, etc. The sound pressure level generated by a noise
source decreases with increasing distance from the source due
to wave divergence (Rau, 1980).
The intensity of sound generally decreases inversely to
the square of the distance to the point source. The absorp-
tion factor is an empirical number which varies with ground
surface. If the ground cover is vegetated or has a soft tex-
ture, sound will decrease at a rate of 4.5 dB every time the
distance between the source and the receptor is doubled. If
the ground between the source and observer is paved or hard,
then the drop-off rate is only approximately 3 dB every time
the distance is doubled (Rau, 1980).
The shielding factor is another empirical number which
takes into account the environment surrounding the source and
the receptor. The shielding factor states that for every 30
-3-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Il~GROUP
meters of very dense landscape vegetation (at least 15 feet
high), 5 dB of additional attenuation can be obtained up to a
maximum of 10 dB.
Noise data from machines representative of the one pro-
posed to be utilized on site, was provided by West Texas CAT
Power Systems 7/31/91 (Appendix B). It can be observed from
the provided data that noise levels decrease more or less in
accordance with the above theories. The data provided is also
consistent with studies conducted by McLean '88, Stanton '87
and Warren ' 8 5 .
Noise levels then, can be predicted for the proposed
action based on the information provided above, the location
of the proposed crusher and the distance to all property lines
or sensitive receptors.
The proposed concrete crusher is to be situated roughly
140 feet west of the eastern property line, 152' east of the
western property line, 340' south of the northern edge of
pavement of Oregon Road and 260' north of the southern prop-
erty line.
Without a vegetative buffer along the east and west prop-
erty lines, it is anticipated, utilizing the above formula,
that noise would be approximately 76-78 dBA. With a 10' vege-
tative buffer, noise would be expected at the lower end,
-4-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tiZ\tGROUP
around 76 dBA. The northern edge of Oregon Road can be antic-
ipated to have noise level readings from the crusher of less
than 60 dBA, due to the greater distance, the presence of a
vegetative buffer and existing berm and existing and proposed
buildings. At the southern property line, noise can be
expected to be less than 70 dBA, due to the rise in topography
in the most northern corner and the 50' vegetated distance
from the edge of bluestone pavement to the property line.
The car crushing operation is simply no more than a pay-
loader pushing the roof flat on a vehicle for stacking pur-
poses and loading onto an awaiting trailer. The most signifi-
cant noise source would be from the diesel engine of the
machine, around 76 dBA at the western property line, without
any vegetative screening. Noise would be significantly
reduced in any other direction due to the mass of the build-
ings in the existing area of the pad.
A review of ordinances to control noise pollution pro-
vides the following: The Code of the Town of Southold pro-
vides no local guidance on noise regulation other than the
prohibition of offensive noise. The Towns of Southampton and
Brookhaven have ordinances which are well-developed (see
McLean '88; Warren '85). Based on distances to the proposed
-5-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ti~GROUP
machinery to property lines, a rationale for noise mitigation
can be approached and is discussed in Section 5.0 of this EAF
Part 3.
3.0 Covenant on Hours of Ooeration
The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated
between the hours of 9: 00 A.M. and 5: 00 P.M. A covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition shall be filed by the
applicant to the satisfaction of the Town.
4.0 Source of Recvclina Material
The source of recycling material will be from the
Southold area, restricted primarily to the north fork of Long
Island. Composition will be determined from quantities con-
tributed by homeowners, contractors and business construction
and demolition debris.
Only clean concrete and asphalt will be processed by the
Excel 2000 Series crusher. Materials will be stored in accor-
dance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the
Regional Solid Waste Engineer, dated 12/10/90.
5.0 Mitiaation of Noise. Dust. Odors and Vectors
5.1 Noise
Noise mitigation is based on the discussion in Item
2.0 of this EAF Part 3. Mitigation is proposed by the
project sponsor in the form of a vegetated buffer
-6-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~GROUP
along all property lines. The concrete and asphalt
crusher is also situated to such an extent to minimize
impacts to sensitive receptors. Noise mitigation
beyond what is proposed can be undertaken if war-
ranted. Increasing the vegetative buffer would atten-
uate noise as per the discussion in section 2.0.
Earthen berms, noise buffering around machinery, etc.
can also be incorporated. However, these are rather
expensive mitigation measures and are not considered
warranted at this time.
5.2 Dust
Any time materials, such as concrete, asphalt, etc.,
are crushed, dust will be produced. According to
information supplied by the manufacturer, Excel Recy-
cling & Manufacturing Inc., the dust produced from the
machines is minimal. A mitigation measure to control
dust production from the crusher unit is a mist
sprayer. The spray bar is located in the intake and
discharge areas. To contain more dust, more water in
the mister is needed. A water wagon can be connected
to the crusher for remote operation or a connection
can be made directly to the water supply infrastruc-
ture of the facility. A water wagon is generally mOre
-7-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
tl~GROUP
cost efficient. As a general rule, more dust tends to
be produced when pure substances are crushed, such as
pure concrete, with no other materials mixed in. Mist
level is constantly monitored so as not to produce a
discharge from the operation. Mist is accurately set
so that dust clings to the crushed material and is not
washed off. No runoff will be associated with the
crusher operation.
5.3 Odors
The proposed recycling facility is to accept only
material as described in Section 4.0. Material
sources will be limited, as provided in a covenant on
the deed. There are no known odors associated with
typical demolition debris operations similar to the
proposed action.
In the event an odor source can be attributed to the
recycling operation, commercially available fans and
filters can be incorporated into the units and build-
ings to mitigate odors. No odors are anticipated from
the proposed facility.
5.4 Vectors
Vectors, such as rats and mosquitoes, which are
known to carry and transmit pathogens, are not consid-
ered to be a significant environmental hazard of the
-8-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t-QMGROUP
proposed action. Construction/demolition recycling
facilities are not typically associated with such nui-
sances. Materials will be stored as per the NYSDEC
Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste
Engineer, dated 12/10/90. Puddling stormwater will be
drained if collecting on the stockpiled material. In
order to avoid providing den and nesting sites for
mammalian vectors dogs, cats, rats, etc., traps or
poisons can be utilized if it is shown that the facil-
ity is a vector source.
Vehicle Trios
Vehicle trips were estimated by reviewing Town of
southold Landfill scale house records and estimating those
trips that would bypass the landfill for the new recycling
facility. Those estimated trips were combined with the aver-
age 5-10 trips per day existing within the excavation and
drainage business. Scale house data is provided in Appendix
D.
7.0
6.0
NYSDEC Aooroval
Plans and application material before the NYSDEC regard-
ing the waste oil containment shed are pending. It is reason-
able to presume that final approval from the Planning Board
-9-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~GROUP
will be conditional upon receipt of a permit from the NYSDEC,
with respect to the waste oil containment shed. Plans for the
shed will be provided to the Planning Board for review.
8.0 Disposal of Waste Fluids
Disposal of collected waste fluids from the passenger
automobile recycling operation will be handled by a duly
licensed hauler. Copies of receipt between the applicant and
the handler are included in Appendix C.
9.0 Further Covenants
A covenant regarding access to the site by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives will be
provided. It is presumed that this covenant will be reflected
in the issuance of the salvage yard operating permit.
-10-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-UMGROUP
References
Louis K. McLean Associates, P. C. ;
Environmental Impact Statement
Unpublished.
H2M Group, 1988. Draft
for North Sea Landfill.
Rau, John G. and David C. Wooten, 1980.
Analysis Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Environmental Impact
USA
Stanton, Donald J.,
Predicted Noise
Unpublished.
1987.
Levels
Acoustic Noise Measurements and
for Model 1000, Eagle Crusher.
Warren, Richard E., 1985. Noise Analysis of Sparrow Sand Mine
site. Unpublished.
I
.
.
I
,
.
.
I
-
-
-
'.
.
.
.
.
!I
I
.
.
r
TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT STATEMENT
NORTH SEA
SANITARY LANDFILL
JUNE 1988
LOUIS K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P. C.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
IN ASSOCIATION WITH
H2M GROUP
.
.
I
:.
I
I
I
I
J
I
"~I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
.
used as a source of daily cover material for the active cell (Cell
II). The Town has secured a triennial mining permit from the New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Therefore, it
is not expected that any cultural impacts will be associated with
the proposed action.
3.2.6
Noise
This section on noise will discuss ambient noise levels at
and around the North Sea Landfill, as well as provide the reader
with more common noise sources for comparative purposes. A
discussion on declbles is also provided, as well as existing'
regulations and standards concerning noise.
Ambient Noise Levels
Existing noise in the vicinity of the project site is in the
form of vehicular traffic movements on area roadways and daily
normal operation activities at the North Sea landfill. Activities
at the landfill include vehicular movements (Le. cars, trucks,
and bucket loaders) involved in depositing, moving and compacting
of solid waste and soil cover.
Ambient noise level data were obtained in and around the
project site at specific reference points which are illustrated in
Figure 3.2.6. L A calibrated Davis Instruments Model 886 Sound
Level Meter Type 2 was utilized for the noise measurements. The
ambient noise levels were recorded on the dB-A and dB-C sound
levels. Sound level readings were recorded on the dB-A and dB-C
so
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ ..... ,
-, ,
.
. .
, - .
.~ (
~ "
.
~7
:-...
,.....
,
;...
. I:
... .[
-.61.': ..
. .
.~...
e. ..:~
...-......
....."':...~-_...
-....
.
.
.
-'0."
.. tIIO.~"
..-
,
.
.
.
.
PROJECT SITE
.
,
,
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
;'N 0 RTHS EA
/ LANDFILL ..'
.
.
..'
"
, '
.. :,
...........:......_..~...........~ .
...... ..
. ,
"'
'-
.~~
. ,
.. ~. . ..
SOURCE: N.Y.S.D.O.T. MAP 1981 SOUTHAMPTON QUAD.
TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON' NORTH SEA LANDFILL
!I,IIJ AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL
. REFERENCE POINTS
LClJIS K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.c. IN ASSOCIATION WITH
~..,
.." .....I~ ..
. ..;.... .:
. -:'7. . .;,-
~..!""..: :.
\.
i
"
,
~
~
.. F
\; ~.
-:.....~ i...
. "'--~ -.~...
U .~
,'0
SCALE: 1"= 2000'
FIGURE 3.2.6.1
I1~M
GROUP
I
I
I
I
fl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
scales for several reasons. First, most municipalities have sound
level regulations and standards in the dB-A scale, and second,
industrial heavy equipment is generally recorded in the dB-C
scale. The ambient noise level at the respective reference point
is provided in Table 3.4. All measurements were made
approximately three feet above ground level.
All sound level data at and around the North Sea Landfill
were recorded by H2H staff on December 28, 1987. Weather
conditions included an overcast day with temperatures at
approximately 40 degrees F. As stated previously, all ambient.
noise levels at the reference points were recorded in both the dB-
A and dB-C scales. Actual data at each reference point for each
scale were taken once every five minutes over a l5-minute time
period. A sound level range was obtained, representing the
minimum to maximum levels indicated on the sound meter at each
reference point. The ranges indicated in Table 3.5 represent the
average of three readings (in their respective scale) taken at
each reference point.
The recorded data reveal the maximum readings on both the
dB-A and dB-C scales to be of the heavy equipment at close range
(i.e.,88 dB-A; 87 dB-C). Slightly lower readings were of passing
motor vehicles (i.e., 60 dB-A; 80 dB-C). The lowest readings
represented quiet ambient conditions (i.e. less than 40 dB-A; 45
dB-C).
51
Reference Point
1. Southwest of the project
site in the woods at
approximately 1,000 ft.
2. East side adjacent to
Major's Path. several
hundred feet south of
the landfill's main
entrance.
3. In woods on west side
of Major's Path directly
opposite the landfill's
main entrance, at
approximately 1,000 ft.
4. Northwest corner of
proposed cell expansion
site.
5. North Sea Road, approx.
800 ft. west of its
intersection w/Major's
Path.
6. Great Hill Road, approx.
1400 ft. east of its
intersection w/Major's
Path.
7. Dirt road east of land-
fill, at approximately
1,000 ft. south of Great
Hill Road.
TABLE 3.4
AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL AT THE REFERENCE POINTS
Average Ambient Noise Level*
dB-A dB-C
Raw Data of Ambient Noise Levels
dB-A dB-C
Conditions
46-53
58-63
48-55
46-53
43-50
59-63
60-65
55-62
Heavy equipment (i.e.
bucket loaders! and their
back-up alert were heard
periodically, interspersed
with woodland quiet.
46-62
59-77
48-75
45-60
45-50
55-80
58-65
65-85
Readings recorded passing
vehicles on Major'S Path (no
heavy trucks).
49-57
62-74
49-55
48-57
50-58
60-67
60-80
65-75
Readings recorded vehicles
passing on Major's Path and
entering/existing landfill
as well as woodland quiet.
40-48**
57-64**
40-47 57-62
40-48 58-65
40-50 57-65
86 75
88 87
40 50-53
40 50-53
40 50-53
<40 45-48
<40 45-48
<40 45-48
<40 45-47
<40 45-47
<40 45-47
Readings recorded inClude
heavy equipment (i.e. bucket
loaders! at approximately
40 and 100 ft.
40***
50-53
No vehicular traffic: quiet
residential neighborhOod.
<40***
45-48
No vehicular traffic: quiet
residential neighborhood.
<40***
45-47
Woodland.
* The ambient noise level at the reference point is provided for both the dB-A and the dB-C sound level scales,
utilizing a calibrated Davis Instruments Model 886 sound level meter accurate to a decibel range of 40 to 140 dB. The
numbers indicate an average of the range (minimum to maximum! of recorded sound levelS at the reference point. Actual
data at each reference point was taken once every five minutes over a IS-minute time period, for a total of three
readings in the specified time frame.
** Single noise level readings of heav," equipment at 40 ft. not included in the average.
*** No range recorded - ambient readings did not fluctuate.
Source of North Sea sound level readings: H2M staff.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 3. 5
COMMON ACOUSTIC NOISE SOURCES AND LEVELS
AT THE RIVERREAD LANDFILL
SOUND SOURCE
Bucket Loader,
Riverhead Landfill
SOUND LEVEL
76 dB-A
82 dB-B
85 dB-C
CONDITIONS
Measured at a distance
of 50 feet to one side
of the loader
Bucket Loader Backup
Alert, Riverhead
Landfill
~o dB-A
80 dB-C
Measured at 50 feet
Gravel Truck
50 feet to the side of
Osborn Avenue
Gravel Truck
86 dB-C
76 dB-C
Measured at road shoulder
Passenger Auto
Measured at road shoulder
Passenger Auto
Interior During
Highway Travel
72 dB-C
As reported for typical
new autos during road
tests
Source of Riverhead Readings: Mr. Donald J. Stanton, P.E.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
For comparative purposes, additional acoustic measurements
were made at and around the project site, as well as at the River-
head landfill, so as to provide some familiar sound references.
These measurements include vehicles passing a roadside vantage
point, a bucket loader at 50 feet and the backup alert from a
bucket loader. These data are provided in Table 3.5
The approximate sound levels of other, more familiar sources
in the A-weighted scale from various locations near the different
noise sources are provided below:
Typical Source
Noise Level
dB-A
Vacuum Cleaner (3 ft away)
Clothes Drier (3 ft away)
Blender (3 ft away)
Air Conditioner (3 ft away)
Jackhammer (50 ft away)
Lawn Mower (50 ft. away)
Chain Saw (50 ft. away)
Snow Blower (50 ft away)
73
63
75
58
88
72
83
85
Based upon information provided in the Environmental Impact
Analysis Handbook by John Rau and David Wooten, when a steady
outdoor noise level of 70 dB-A exists, relaxed conversational
speech is virtually impossible. Even with a raised voice, satis-
factory conversation is not possible for distances greater than
about 5 feet.
52
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
Decibels
For reference purposes, a discussion of decibels, dB, and the
measurements of same will be detailed herein.
The physical description of sound concerns its loudness as a
function of frequency. Typically, noise is composed of many fre-
quency components of various loudness distributed over the audible
frequency range. Various noise scales have been established to
describe quantita'tively the response of the average person to a
complex sound composed of various frequencies at different
loudness levels. Therefore, simplified techniques have been
developed to account for the dependence of perceived loudness upon
frequency. This is done by the use of weighting filters in noise
measuring instruments which give a direct reading of approximate
loudness.
The sound level of an object can be reported in decibels
(dB), on three different weighted scales: dB-A, dB-B, and dB-C.
Sound intensity (sound pressure) is measured relative to a
standard reference level of 0.002 microbar. A sound meter, such
as the one used to record the measurements for this report, is
equipped with the most common frequency weighting networks (scales
A, B and C) which alter the frequency response of the sound meter.
This alteration occurs in much the same manner as a stereo system
equalizer alters the frequency response of the stereo sound
system. However, in the case of the sound meter, the frequency
53
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
response is present. The relative frequency response of each
weighted scale is illustrated in Figure 3.2.6.2. The dB-A scale
is 27 dB lower in relative frequency response than the dB-C scale.
For example, at 30 Hz the dB-C is 27 dB more sensitive than the
dB-A scale, and 10 dB more sensitive than the dB-B scale. The
essential difference between the weighted scales is that the
higher the letter scale (i.e. dB-C), the greater the low
frequency response. The response of the dB-C scale corresponds to
the response of the human ear to hear loud noise. The relatively
low frequency rumbling machinery noise, such as that produced by
heavy machinery at the landfill, is an example of loud noise. In
effect, the dB-C scale "hears better" than the dB-A or dB-B scales
for loud noises. Thus, the dB-C scale was the predominant scale
used in collecting noise data. The dB-C scale also provides the
highest readings of the three weighted noise level in order to
rate a sound's loudness, this aids in determining the impact a
noise may have on humans.
The dB scale used provides an indication of the ratio of
sound intensity measured relative to the reference level (0.0002
microbars). This relationship can be described mathematically as
follows:
dB - 10 10910 (Measured Level)
( 0.0002 )
No formula exists to provide a direct conversion from one
scale to another.
54
-
"" ,
1 .-
---
20: .
I : _ . .
W'::.
en. ... .
- -. ..
OZ," .:
'. ....
O ...
. .
Q. :
en..
a: ::.:
lOW::::' .
>- - .
-. .
l-
e(::: :
20 a:
3
4
NOISE METER RESPONSE
1.000
NORTH SEA LANDFILL . FIGURE NO. 3.2.6.2
11~,"
rnr-.t Ir"'\
SOURCE: MR. DONALD J.
STANTON, P.E.
TOWN
!''I'-I
100
OF SOUTHAMPTON.
. . ,.
. r' .,,.....
." - - - - -. --.-.. ,.,.-.'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Noise Requlations and Standards
Noise control regulations exist at the federal, state, county
and local levels. The Noise Control Act of 1972 gives the u.s.
Environmental Protection Agency the authority to set standards for
the noise levels produced by major noise sources.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) general
industry standards are established only for the operator of a
piece of equipment, not the general public. A piece of equipment
may be within OSHA operator limits, but still be considered noisy
by persons at a distance from the source.
Pursuant to Title 29, Section 1910.95 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (29 CFR 1910.95), protection against the effects of
the noise exposure must be provided to equipment operators (and
others, as applicable) when sound levels exceed those illustrated
below when measured on the A-weighted decibel scale:
Duration Per Day
(hours)
Sound Level
dB-A
8
6
4
3
2
1-1/2
1
1/2
< 1/4
.'.
90
92
95
97
100
102
105
110
1.l.5
55
I
I
I
il
'I
I
I
I
II
I
1
I
I
I
-
I
;.
I
I
I
If the daily noise exposure is composed of two or more
periods of noise exposure of different levels, their combined
effect should be considered, rather than the individual effect of
each. When employees are subjected to sound exceeding the limits
above, personal protective equipment should be provided to reduce
sound levels.
The states have the authority to control noise by licensing,
regulating or res~ricting the use, operation and movement of noise
sources and by setting maximum noise levels permi tted in the
environment.
In New York state, Part 450, Noise from Heavy Motor Vehicles,
of Title 6, New York Code of Rules and Regulations (6 NYCRR Part
450) provides maximum permissible motor vehicle sound levels in
dB-A. Part 450 is applicable at any time or under any condition
of highway grade, load acceleration or deceleration. However, it
is not applicable to:
o a vehicle with a maximum gross weight of < 10,000 pounds
o a combination of vehicles having a maximum gross weight
of ~ 10,000 pounds
o warning devices (i.e., horns, sirens) and associated
vehicles.
56
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
il
I
/I
II
il
I
I
II
II
I
I
A summary of the maximum permissible sound level readings (in
dB-A) follows:
Distance Between Measuring
Point to Target Vehicle
(in Feet)
35-38
39-42
43-47
Range of Maximum
Sound Level
(dB-A)
89-95
88-94
87-93
48-57
58-69
70-82
86-92
85-91
84-90
Regulations regarding maximum permissible noise levels from.
automobile and other sources not covered by Part 450 are at the
local level.
Noise standards at the local level in the Town of Southampton
are found in Chapter 47, Noise, of the Town Code. Noise standards.
are provided for use in residential and also commercial or
industrial zoning districts. No noise standards are provided for
the Open Space Conservation (OSC) zoning district in which the 6-
acre project site is located. Therefore, the data can only be
compared to the sound levels established for residential and
commercial or industrial districts. For residential districts,
all readings in dB-A, except for passing motor vehicles and inter-
mittent heavy equipment activity, are within Town standards. For
industrial or commercial districts, all readings dB-A, except for
passing motor vehicles and intermittent heavy equipment activity
57
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
are within Town standards. It should be noted that the majority
of the North Sea landfill property is within the OSC zoning
district pursuant to the official zoning map for the Town (4th
Update: May 1986).
Noise standards for the Town are provided herein. In a resi-
dential district, no person shall create or cause to be emitted
any noise which, when measured at any lot line in a residential
district, exceeds the following standards:
(1) From 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
a) airborne sound in excess of 65 dB-A; or
b) airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in dB which exceeds the values
listed below in one (1) or more ocatve bands:
Octave Band
Center Frequency
(Hertz, Hz) in
cycles per sec.
Octave Band
Sound Pressure
Level (dB)
3L5
63
J.25
250
500
J.OOO
2000
4000
8000
78
73
67
60
55
51
46
43
40
(2) From 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
a) airborne sound which has a sound level in
excess of fifty (50) dB-a; or
58
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
b) airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in dB which exceeds the values
listed below in one (1) or more octave bands:
Octave Band
Center Frequency
(Hertz, Hz) in
cycles per sec.
Octave Band
Sound Pressure
Level (dB)
75
70
64
57
52
49
43
40
37
31.5
63
125
250
500
1000
2000
4000
8000
In a commercial or industrial district, noise standards are
such that no person shall create or cause to be emitted any noise
which, when measured at any lot line in a commercial or industrial
district, exceeds the following standards:
(1) From 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.:
a) airborne noise in excess of seventy (70) dB-A; or
b) airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in decibels which exceeds the
values listed below in one (1) or more bands:
Octave Band
Center Frequency
(Hertz, Hz) in
cycles per sec.
Octave Band
Sound Pressure
Level (dB)
85
80
74
67
62
58
53
50
47
31.5
63
125
250
500
1000
2000
4000
8000
59
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(2) From 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.:
a) airborne sound which has a sound level in excess
ot titty-five (55) dB-A; or
b) airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in decibels which exceeds the
values listed below in one (1) or more octave
bands :
Octave Band
Center Frequency
(Hertz, Hz) in
cycles I'er sec.
Octave Band
Sound Pressure
Level (dB)
78
73
67
60
55
51
46
43
40
31.5
63
125
250
500
1000
2000
4000
8000
The provisions listed above apply to the use of occupancy of
any lot or structure thereon and to noise produced thereby except
the following:
o The intermittent or occasional use between 7:00 a.m.
through 7:00 p.m. of homeowner's light residential out-
door equipment or commercial service equipment, provided
that said equipment and its use comply with the other
provisions of Chapter 47.
o Construction activities between 7: 00 a.m. through 7: 00
p.m. and the associated use of construction devices or
to the noise prOduced thereby, provided that such
activities and such equipment and their use comply with
the other provisions of Chapter 47.
o Agriculture
60
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o Noise from church bells or chimes used in conjunction
with religious services.
o Public celebrations.
o Noise of aircraft flight operations.
o The lawful operation of properly equipped motor vehicles
on any public way.
This local law does .not apply to emergency stationary and
mobile signal devices or audible exterior burglar alarms in opera-
tion for 15 minutes or less. Penalties for offenses of the local
law are a fine of not more than $250., or by imprisonment of.not
more than 15 days, or both.
61
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.-
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REPORT
ACOUSTIC NOISE MEASUREMENTS
AND
PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS
FOR
MODEL 1000, C:AGLE CRUSHER
JULY 1987
F'REPARED BY:
DONALD J. STANTON PE
7 WHITNEY COURT
SMITHTOWN, NY 11787
PREPARED FOR:
H2M GRCUF'
575 BROADHOLLOW ROAD
MELVILLE, NY 11747-5076
JUL 2 4 1987
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f:.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
"
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I NTRODUCT ION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
DISCUSS I ON. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
CONCLUS IONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
APPENDIX A--ACOUSTIC NOISE MEASUREMENT
APPENDIX B--EAGLE CRUSHER MODEL JUMBO 1000
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
FIGURE 1............................. ..CRUSHER MEASUREMENT SITE
FIGURE 2...................................PROJECT LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 3.................MEASURED AND EXTRAPOLATED NOISE LEVELS
FIGURE 4...........................................LAND USE MAP
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1..........................CRUSHER OPERATING NOISE LEVELS
TABLE 2... .........AMBIENT NOISE LEVE~S, RIVERHEAD PROJECT SITE
TABLE 3. .................COMMON ACOUS7IC NOISE SOURCES ~< LEVELS
TABLE 4..... .............PROJECTED RE~ERENCE POINT NOISE LEVELS
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I(~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTRODUCTION
This ~epo~t contains acoustic noise measu~ements made on a
conc~ete c~ushe~. Model Jumbo 1400, manufactu~ed by Eagle C~ushe~
Co~po~ation. The objective of the measu~ement effo~t was
twofold:
1. To obtain an estimate of noise that might be p~oduced in the
vicinity of the designated p~oject site by a Model 1000
c~ushe~
2. To dete~mine any p~eferences ~egarding o~ientation of a
c~ushe~ at the p~oject site.
Both objectives we~e accomplished.
Ext~apolation of noise data obtained on a simila~ Eagle
Crusher indicates that noise levels in the vicinity of the
project site will be well within cu~rent noise levels (ie before
c~ushe~ installa~ion). Rega~ding o~ientation of the C~ushe~ at
the p~oject site, it appears not to be an ove~~iding facto~ and
that othe~ ope~ating considerations can be given p~efe~ence
instead.
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DISCUSSION
Noise measurements were made on an operating Eagle Corp.
Model Jumbo 1400 Crusher, with muffler, during concrete crushing
operations. The Crusher is owned by Davies Bros. Corp, Howell,
NJ, and is currently being operated at Barrett Corp. facilities
in Trenton, NJ. Measurements were made at distances of 10 and 50
feet from the skin of the Crusher in three quadrants. The fourth
quadrant was inaccessible because of the presence of conveyors
and mounds of crushed product.
Additional measurements were made, as the site permitted, at
the operator station and at 100 feet and 250 feet distances away
from the operator station. The operator station has a reference
point of 0 feet, for purposes of this discussion. The 250 foot
measurement was made with a direct, clear path to the Crusher and
with a 20 foot sand berm between the observation point and the
Crusher. Measurement site geometry is shown in Figure 1.
While most measurements were made on dB scales A, Band C,
the intensity of the noise generated by the Crusher makes scale C
the most appropriate and realistic (see Appendix AI. Scales A
and B diminish the effects of low frequencies (rumble type of
noise that is a significant factor during Crusher operation).
The frequency response of the sound meter for dB scales A, Band
C is provided in Appendix A. It is apparent from these scales
that the C scale is the most responsive to low frequency noise.
For example, at 30 hz the C scale is 27 dB more sensitive than
the A scale and 10 dB more 3ensitive than the B scale.
2
- -,-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .~- -
1- ---
I
(
I
(
I
I
I
I
I@.----
I
SA"JD
VTORIIG€
-.-...-..----.-.....
AREA
NO SC.ALE
.- ~
CCnlc..I7.l":Tl::
RIA 13~L.1:.
B
.- t5brr-
- _ .J~/VCE
- -
HOPpe~
OPGRIITt>~
f'l.AT..O~M
CONV(!.'(ep.
1'I$5a,.,~y
5ID€4A(IEI)
.DIESEL
GfJ<l.,fJE
--
- -----~.
---
CRU51ll:D
PHoPlAc, T
sWAA;e
!Jill: II
CRuSHER M~ASlAI?.EM!::IVT 51,.1::
FIGU P.E 1.
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
All measurements were made approximately 5 feet above ground
level. The New Jersey site is flat except for piles of sand,
concrete rubble, and crushed product. Fencing around the site
constrained distance measurements. Crusher noise measurement
data obtained at the New Jersey site are provided in Table 1.
Other factors noted during the measurements at the New
Jersey site were the high noise levels at the operator station,
ground tremors noticable at 100 feet and dust produced during
Crusher operation. (It should be noted that an included
sprinkler system was not functioning at the time of measurement.
The sprinkler would most likely eliminate the dust product.)
Background ambient noise measurements were made at the
proposed Riverhead Crusher site and at preselected reference
points outside the Riverhead site. Riverhead reference point
geometry is shown in Figure 2. Ambient noise levels measured are
provided in Table 2.
Additional acoustic noise measurements were made to provide
some familiar sound references. These measurements included
passing automobles and trucks from a roadside vantage point, a
bucket loader at 50 feet and the backup alert from a bucket
loader. Data are provided in Table 3.
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
,
I
I
TABLE 1
*CRUSHER OPERATING NOISE LEVELS. TRENTOI\;. NJ
DISTANCE (FT) SIDE** NOISE_ LEVEL (DB/SCALE)
AVERAGE RANGE
o (OPERATOR PLATFORM)
4
1
95/C
10
95/C
10
2
97/C
10
."
~.
94/C
10 4
50 1
50 2
50 3
50 4
100 2
250 (NO BERM) 2
85/C
90/C
90/C
83/C
72/C
250(15FT HIGH SAND BERM)
..,
~
58/C
93-102/C
84-89/A
88-92/8
88-100/C
95-99/A
96-100/B
95-99/C
88-94/A
92-96/8
92-99/C
NO DATA
8- 9-'C
.;:.- ..:;,/
88-95/C
88-95/C
NO DATA
81-85/C
65-74/f\
65-75/B
70-75/C
55-bile
tf-IUDEL 1400 E~)GLE CF,USHER OUR I NG ROADWAY CONCRETE CRUSI--I I NI;
Ufo-ForU) T IONS.
* *fiEE FIGURE 1
~
-,
'C
\
-- ---- /
//
C". ~
<i- '\
/~ A
. ~ ~
:\
"
......-
L\
\
. ~ ~
."\ \
'\"~. 'y..y'\:----_. .
c ,/.~ ---- :..
" ~>. " ",' ~'-' .
~,{J)y \'. I~\. .-
'\ '. .-';.)>:/ '\
' ,
\ .. \ I
..,/ 'i" .. '. .'==::: \
' ''- ,_. .
~ \~ .'
',. ,'- -'
. ~:-;.~ .
. .-y
"
~
\ / .' . 1!, t~., \
... ". \(Y".'
.' .~ i \ .~~ . . f:::'l' :~\
. ,'\.' '-=') ,"\
-' ~~-.,r:~-.
~.~ ~ ., ';1.:1.~ _l:~
" v
....
\.' ,
\
,
" .-
, .-
\,... ,/
. .-
,
/
".
..~. ./
.' //
/
_t'_
~
.
---.- -
.. - ---
4)
,
'n
---.
--
"
...........
~.
i ;:
/
/"/\
\ \. /" /
',- .\ /~~
-:-~'^ ?:/ \( \
\ -... ~
\
"
\. ,,/"
.\ .
\"./.-\
"
"
..: r.
\.'\. ;~'-'- ;.:::-".--
_.. . ./. J
.:..... _...- -~
\ \ / /
. T/
\I
/ .-
'\ /
..j,'
\ /
. \.:,y/
'- "'-..
--
/
"
,<",'
- _. . - - ,,,,,,'" \
,
,
..
\
~r
,
......
\
;
o =.-.:-
'I
"- -... -...
....----.
\'
\
\
\\
,
\. \,
.\'
-~- \\//
o
...
\ \ \
" . \ '\ ../ \\
,~~~--_~ ~h\:
--
"
\
\\""
."
\
"~I @ COuo<" Of ."'''''. .:~.'L-
k"", ......-.-'--.. '5- '-
....J- -=::-=.._ .-.<<MOO ._
- --'
-
LOCATION MAP
\
/\
~.. ..
"
\P
~
FIGURE ~
'.
,
,
,
,"
"
(J)
;......::;..
.:;;:;'"
"
'.
",'
\ \
~ ~_o_ \,~" \
'\ \
'.\
\. .....-
/, \~
o -- \
~""\'"''
'..;::....,.,. /... \ ..
(') \ ?~. , ){-....;~
.. , . ,':' .:. .~\~'
\ "\' ~~ / ~
\ ~-.... . .~... ....
\ \, . / ,
~ \/ .
~. . a....~
... ,/... ~
., .:_( -".,
" "
\~~,~~
'-. :-\".
\~ "
\ \
\ .,...........'.
\....... .........
.\.... ..
...., \
\. '. "\.
'.-" :....... .
~:./' .... .~~.~' (..... .. ,-\,--..'- ..:;
", ...;. '- -. \
~'..'. ,
oj' ,~~
- .'
. '" ..-
., ," \,\....
\
\
J-lZ"
HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P.C.
~;ot.lSu~ liNG ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMEN1Al SCieNTISTS. ARC....I1Eers..no "LANNERS
Mf'ItI"'lll." T
fIlAw...c.nAll ...
n.vrn..,..o H ..
fll...r.,.o H J
l
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
TABLE 2
AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS. RIVERHEAD PROJECT SITE
REFERENCE 'POINT* NOISE LEVEL (DB/SCALE)
(RIVERHEAD LANDFILL GENERATOR AT 60 FT)
1 65/A
72/B
76/C
(BUCKET LOADER AT TOWN LANDFILL)
2 76/A
82/B
85/C
(DOG GATE, YOUNGS AVE.)
.,.
'-'
63/A
70/B
76/C
(ATOP BERM, NO SITE ACTIVITY)
4 62/A
67/B
72/C
5 62/A
67/B
72/C
(NO TRAFFIC ON OSBORN AVE. )
6,7 40/A
45/B
50/C
*SEE r I GLJnE 2 LIJCI\T lllN MAP, FOR REFERENCE POINT LOCATIOI\fS
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~,
I
I
TABLE. 3
COMMON ACOUSTIC NOISE SOURCES S,.LEVELS
SOUND SOURCE
SOUND LEVEL
<DB/SCALE)
BUCKET LOADER
76/A
82/8
85/C
BUCKER LOADER BACKUP ALERT 90/A
GRAVEL TRUCK 80/C
GRAVEL TRUCK 86/C
PASSENGER AUTO 76/C
PASSENGER AUTO 72/C
INTERIOR DURING HWY TRAVEL
8
COND IT IONS
MEASURED AT A DISTANCE
OF 50 FT TO ONE SIDE OF
THE LOADER.
MEASURED AT 50 FT
50 FT TO THE SIDE OF
OSBORN AVE.
MEASURED AT ROAD
SHOULDER
MEASURED AT ROAD
SHOULDER
AS REPORTED FOR TYPICAL
NEW AUTOS DURING ROAD
TESTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
CONCLUSIONS
Sufficient data were obtained to assess:
1. Probable noise levels that will be produced by the proposed
Crusher at reference locations for the Riverhead site.
2. The noise reduction effect of the berms at the Riverhead
site.
3. The preferred orientation of a crusher at the
Riverhead site.
A plot of the data taken along reference lines A and B, as
indicated in Figure 1, is illustrated in Figure 3. These data
are used to estimate the noise levels that can be expected at
reference points 1 through 7 (shown on Figure 2 Location Map).
Extrapolation along reference line A provides an estimate of
noise levels in the absence of a berm. Differential measurements
made along reference lines A and B at a distance of 250 feet are
used to estimate the noise shielding effect of the berm. Note
the sand berm located between the noise measurement site and the
Crusher along reference line B in Figure 1. The measured
shielding effect of the berm was 14 db, however the actual
shielding effect of the berm is believed to be greater than this
amount, but residual background noise behind the berm prevented
accurate measurement of the shielding effect beyond 14 db.
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/10
100
'70
T
t -
1 \l
\
.
1- P~"'~\1E.L..
ME.AS '-li)c.D D AT A - ftVli u:.1T!<L.
- I"WJ;MI4~ I..l?I1EI.
l:HAA l'oL..!lTIOrJ - - · - - -
NOlfJE
bO
L.EVEL
(.DE>)
70
!'
.........
.......
-
...
-
-
\.WI T"HOl.l. T
P .BERM
--
-
--
-......
.
. --
bO
T
.,
1 '...
...
SEItM
~E. SHIIiU>tIJG.
e FF f:.c. T - t<t.l>.5
.....
So
'. ...
.....
5'"--------
-
WITH a~RI-'\ - - .
401
o y;o
~oo
600
8CO
\000
RADIAL PtST F1 NC E - FT
MEA5L1REI>
f EXTRflfOLATFJJ NOI5t:. Lf:LlE L:S
FtGU.I?E .3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
Based on these results Table 4 provides an estimate of
expected average noise levels at the Riverhead site. Included
with these estimates are the noise levels measured at the
Riverhead site with no machinery operating at the Suffolk Cement
Recycling facility. A positive differential between the current
measurements in the vicinity of the Riverhead project site and
the projected noise levels with the Crusher operating are an
indication that noise from the Crusher may be perceptible.
However note that all differentials are negative except at
reference point 6. Therefore, even if perceptible, the levels at
reference point 6 are significantly less than normal street
noise, such as passing traffic. A differential of 0 dB indicated
that the estimated noise from the Crusher will be equal to the
present background noise. A negative differential indicates that
noise from the Crusher will be less than the present background
noise at the measurement point.
Reference to the measurements made at the Trenton, NJ site
in three quadrants shows a maximum difference of +7 dB in
sustained noise measuredopposite the engine ventilator of the
Crusher. Opposite ends of the Crusher each produced
approximately the same sustained noise levels, with the end
containing the hopper producing higher peak rumble noises due to
concrete material shifting and making contact with the hopper
sidewalls during the crushing operations.
11
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I-
.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TABLE 4
PROJECTED REFERENCE POINT~NOISE. LEVELS
APPROXIMATE
DISTANCE (FT)
REFERENCE FROM PROPOSED
POINT CRUSHER LOCATION
AVERAGE NOISE
LEVEL
PROJECTED** PRESENT***
D I FFERENTIAU
<D8)
1 450 53 DB/C 76 DB/C -23
LANDFILL GENERATOR
~ 750 48 DB/C 85 DB/C -37
"-
BUCf<ET LOADER
.". 450 53 DB/C 76 DB/C -23
~.
4 300 57 DB/C 72 DB/C -15
5 550 51 DB/C 72 DB/C -21
6 600 50 DB/C 50 DB/C 0
7 750 48 DB/C 50 DB/C -2
* AVG. PROJECTED CRUSHER NOISE MINUS PRESENT AMBIENT/BACKGROUND NOISE LEVELc
** CRUSHER NOISE ONLY.
*** RECORDED NOISE LEVELS.
12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The land use map (Figure 4) shows residential land usage
both north and south of the Riverhead project site, along Osborn
Avenue. Riverhead Town landfill the site of a generator, and
where trash dumping and earthmoving operations are ongoing,
occupies the parcel west of the project site. This suggests that
from a noise standpoint, the Crusher, if installed at the project
site, be oriented with the long dimension approximately N-S with
the engine vent facing West. As the differential noise levels
from the Crusher are not significantly different, and given the
presence of at least 35 foot high earth berms and a somewhat
baffled entry to the base of the sand pit at the project site
where the CrUSher is to be located, orientation is not
sufficiently critical to override other site operation
considerations. These considerations include location of
unprocessed concrete rubble, location of processed product,
maneuver space for loading the hopper, space for any conveyor
system that will be needed and, finally, access to and from the
site.
Summarizing, measured and extrapolated data indicate that a
Jumbo 1000 Crusher installed at the Riverhead project site will
contribute less noise than current ambient noise levels, as
measured at selected reference locations. These results indicate
that it is unlikely that noise generated by the Crusher will be
perceptible outside the grounds of Suffolk Cement project site.
Regarding orientation of the Crusher in the excavated site
at the project slte, while a North-South orientation of the long
axis of the Crusher may ~e preferable, the data indicate that it
is not necessary.
13
~ ,\\
~. .>" &(f/j.\ ~...
"c' ' L'" ,.." .
'-"'.' '.~\'l?:}! J.~(/J.~,:;,;' I
A,-t't.J.... .'4.,..... v~' , "'('OO:hli"'\'~
.~......'~', ,';", ,'. c Q...;\)(....:O..'):~
,~" ..:,.\;:.}<r-..;.V,,~"rJ {tn'.,) (.' ....n..
k.~.~:..~/i'5:/(..[.;~i'::)' (f~"'~ ().~..;;.J ),1 \ \
,\J n'y.f":,,:, '.:" r. ~ ". !>'J ? " . ..:' f..' .
?r..~' (. .~ \~ ,..~'I"
'" ,',t, .!I '1'; (l ...... <;. .... " \} .
] ".';:, ,f ", .4 ,.'t.. <;.:.' "J.<;:::l \:.. o' ~} {, t (, t...... \
~J ~\<..I'~:'t.t'.t\'rJ rl" 1)'.. ~..,f-rJ ."C~ t:',~( ,
..__ ' 'ltl:, .... . !.".' 11 . () .
"~' ......r. :'. ..' (I.... ..>t.,....... .,(1 .. t'." '
(i':" ,'r 'J"':': [,.:,.,.-. r..'.;......I.~ t'::.,~,.':i'.t
" .'" . "...J .... .., · \,' t.' \, ~.' ,
'" Il ~ ..~ .' Ii' " . " .' " '......... . (. . . ~., O' ('0' .
oJ. J.,1 "':} . '" (," .' .' ~ ,. <- "1'" 'J" ..
:J 0 ....)'<.' ~) , .. (, l;" 0 \.<1,.0' .,". ',' ,. C.... '," Co ,;.,....,.
. '" \. .... i' J ,.' t"".... .' r. 'fl' .,....', Jo.' 1""
., ~ (, C tl i.:'" ."\., " ,,"r.(/:' f.:" .r:"'),,"':J": /'f" ~ .......
'" .' .' < . . ,"" ..~, . - '. . ..... ,".
\~.l :;....'~J. .1) ~'<1' '\ \. ~;n ~l r'\" l.l .. .~l'..~ ~~ ...? f;'1 o. ,,' jl~'~ .
. " t' II ' ." . .. ,,' 'I r,' ..' ,. * .'. '.1'
'1') ,\.) .,," . ro<. ~~.r.;' ..... ." ".'1 .':,'C..,
~rvl':" !)~~~.;:.I:.)r:..;>.......f:' ,.!,';;r;o:...r;' ,':r,'i
;. '., ",".' ,: . ,,'.P .,~ c".'n ..':'},~.,,,..~l)l' ..' ',I.
..~.'l.\J.(.< ,G;:~...III............,f;."'(.f'^'.r..'. ,.
'j' . r ' '. ", .' ,.... .... ' .' r" .'
'1'," ' :i .,/.. r.;.,..;.,., c:" r.- '.nr;.......... , . -.
,.........,l_ ....., .........r~.-'
'L"l" .~"''''';:'..'''' ..~_{~\.,;...;,v",,:,,'.f;")"""';':'- .,'"
\, ,./...",(;, .. ,,'i' '1'0'"'' r'.('....o.Ifr~'jf:.o.., .
...t,...... ::... ,.....,...".... ,..(.." . ," ," . ~
..\:.. ~ ....~.: ., ':",0\.\, .. '1""""'" ," .' .,( .,.. . . ,,"" ...... .
.' . .." ..... .,/.o..... ,. .' ..... .
. " . q," ,..: . ."1.. ~ .... ......n.f " . .'" .... ,... ...
" .~ '1 . :,. ,....,.,.. ..,.... ..v :: ,'" ..' . ." ;.9.,
',<,", C," ",0 ".' ,. """ " ,.' '." . .," . .' . -'"
. If;' ' . > .,. d ." .." ,'" .'" ".-~
. . _'. ,... c' n'~' ,,........ . ...., ," ..,. .,.../' .1>--~' ''','j i
~. .."," ,,,' .,' I. " ,;c/~"'" . '),,--., .'
"q'>... 0">"" . ...., ." ."" .." . . ",'" .,', ,,' "~I ~.
'.-:' ....... ..~ A'.- .wi . .,. ~ fro . . ,- . .. ,.... ,~'..:' ".'
I" '"U SZ., ," ........ ...... . ... .,. .' ,/r . '" ........' W'" ,.
,,:...t. ,. ..' ...... .' . /..,. .....-. ..,... .. .....' "...,.... /' .
.e y...... .,"" .,''', ' ... ," ~ '..I. .' ,_:,t. ..1...{l': I"
._-:\.. ... " .' ,.. ..' .. . . ! ..... .. ,.".. ~. /\;/",.:- .
., "_ ....' ,'" .... "\.... A"'" 1 ..~ '.' \ \ ',.
) ~".:o.:.. ..".. !....' ..' ,"lv/"..2! ,.!., .,.. ," ,.... .... ,/..... ,.... ,,~ ' . 'IIi '"
_" "..\ . .," ..., r ,"" .,' . ," "'. ,,,..,,.,' ·
..,." .", ""- .." ,'" '.. ...,",
. ,,>c." ,.'" ,. ,," . .,." ,,,,,,,,, .," .. ,,, ," ..
.. ,~ .; c. ;. , . ,..... ,". \".:' .,),. -
. .' .'.', .". ,'.". ,'" ...'" '". ." .'
" ."" ,'." . "". ""..' , ." ,'" '.' " ..".' ',,, ..,,\ .
. c." ,l' (: ., ..... .' ,"" ~ .". ."" ..... . .,' 'J':' . . I.... . ." " ..
......, .(k .~.. ,.. t' ,,,, .
, ,"'....... c, ',.. ,.... . ... .... ,.... .~.;t\ "11: ".".10 ":-'"
..,::....." 0:.", .... ".... .. ..... . .f.V....'.... .. ......
" c. . . ... .' .. .. " ,.,.., "' Q '.J ..~;;" .. . ,:l' .... ,.""
:""_"1'<1'"''-''''''''' ".... . ..el......'. ""IV. .. .
:; .[).,<\:;.!,~.;o;,..' .' ....o;:.~J. .;,.~:,~!.:;..:~.:j~~ 'oj.,,-"
",~'.r.':.c.':- " "... " t..' ..)~."..:,,,r.li"":V;"'~:~"'!""''''
'" " ," .' :y J,.... ,..... ..',.... ~.)? ".~., .
:.,",); j' ,-,"'C'. ......Il..'.'''\. _.._~...:J.. ~ ...tl'0!'
: "." I .:. ::. l"''';''~ .....; ..' '\). ,.. '" .'~ .' ".!,.; '.. C'," ,., J.>-'
.. '_" . .' ..,.....HV..... .!.' ,. ","'"
CJ .. ,..... ..... ...,' {,'.V.. ".\ ."" "V/I.t",' ...' Ifll!' .,
el' :I<;~'~" /l ot" . ~...." .. ...... ,.).. .....,. "''l~ ~,r/i'
.\:o..~......"..,. 1(;1' ....lIc'~"'}'" .:t,- ,. '''~ ~
,. .:PJ ....; , .f;;.. ",: .,." :>....1. ,'. ,>' ~'. "'. ~ .' .,;."
."..,:-) .,. '.' ,"'. . ". ., ,.J ..._ ~, '.. . n' .'."l).... :r,~','i".
",It.. D ,'3 r.... ,:j (}..;')., .....:> ,..,t':~..'''/'''' "" 1 I'
,'\' v\..,.lit. .J, l: ''J/ll'J!,,'" ,,I "L'~tf' \
.J.'n'\....U,,'\.,.:,....\. ~"",.,,'fJt'" "1r;,,:1,..1:'i'.l~;i, ,p'
. ., . c' <'J ~... . .. ," /. ' . "I"
',"\. ,.....).~t ..~.J.i.. .... ,"J' ,./I'!'ll.l,~", " 1'!' 'i~t~'~\fl'l
"1"'\ .. " "v" ..... '''j'''''! ~
,,",;,,"/" 't,? ,,' <>,,;.fI, , ,.~'.'., ",;,,"'"'' . ?
"'l ..).',t' _', .~., :, '-.0;"1 . ,,"
. ," ..,' :;"". tV"" V. \').".... ..\,~. .t' .
I.'., 'J" '...... .1 ..;.,,~..I ,............ ..' --
tl\~:J ,I . r. . ,1 ,) .~~.a ~ "r :"..,')" .;"3-> .;.' #'
...;.~. ,} "" ..' ;".. ,. ,'J'" ." ."..r..... ,.:.' J I
.1' .;.. n '. ..II'.! "f>.' l')'!. :,,' .. ,~ .,' ~ YJ
J.:~'I..At....,....~'~. ,'1'. ~lf...)!l':l'\ .c:,.:.'i. I
c _.. .'\.' . .'J . ..-..' ... .'. ".
.\:l...i1.....:'\. I "",,'-e.J<':. . .~%./;,c. ",., /'
.' '1 .). '\ . ... .' 0 ....'l ,. ..' 'C' .',. v '.
\~):t;.~ \#\' \. '. I ...{..;,;.,!,~:.,.,V"l':~'" ;"..b....<~..~.;,. I
r \ \_'\,' " .."..' ,.:> _,<.1".1 r,;. ~.,.,::, ..
I'.' .. .' ..;..0')..:.....'.) ~.: .. . ~ I~'" .~. .;."".~...
....... ,. #:\:,..('r','l'~"" ":J"~"'t~'o.'\J"':;o')"":"'Jo,!",,,,"/';'li.,,t~.
.\ .... ., ,,-..' -. .. . ."..
. .' ....." \" r,. " . :j,..J ......... c'; ,,~;;.I .....04 r, v ',"/' It] .........
~ .'.\\ .? .<,!', -: "i':~~' '0:,: .'>' ;;,.;. "'.'~"O:,.- :<..~;" "i'
, \ /' 'n"':' .;~,},!r\oJ"', ',J,.' '( "(',,,..,:" ,",!'LJ ,)...Y"
\t.. \ o!1J' "..1 'j' . ~. . 'J~"" c.:: ., .
: 't. ,t. . " ' '" .:> ,'.1. ~".,~..... (. ,.(, ~ ,:>!'
,,'" I...... ",' " ~....., ........,]
. ,,~.:."., (\.c:., 't' '.. ,:.0 '.' U',.: (
C'," . ,'., ..'} .. J . ,," r', ':- /"
.' ..'J>. ..;", oJ." ;,'0 ',:.' r;.',l
. . v'" ..1.),...!,.1 I"""" ~,) ..
.tJj...,.. 'I;,)~ .\' (0..., ~.c,.,'
. '.. ,! u ., ..........
,tJ'" ';. . ,. 6') .. ")' ":l
.. ." l,J: I ,,;,' ;.
~iffC'" I" J'-')' d.
" ~ ,a.../: ~'''.' "t~ ..Vt,~..,
I' . 'J".'J /). ~....v '"
..... ., ..' ..;. f .J.... " (.' c-
.." _' .. ,.!", .:i()~r. ;......., I.'
;;;. :J,l' .,,'j ..c,);, I"';> .' ., ,~:-hl\ '. ~;"
st,: .....,...,,;,',;... ,-" ,-,' \:,. .t:
:." ,..'J' .).... ", ...t: ....
;;~~ ~< D~7 ". ,./I."''<..':.t;.... .
.~.' ..' ,\0 ':." ,'. "" y
,-r;1 f ' . :'.I~~."'\...; N.,r' . ",-"':,,.....t/ I
'. :. d.n..,- ~,) - :.. " . .
. . ..,'nl J .~~,~' .....r I
.,. ".. () '" ,'. -./.' I 1
"t. I \.' '--.I 1
~ ...,'" /'.1' .
'J' II c' 'I. I ;. '
.; tA
I
h!~
:.''i!
h~'r~
I 'l,!
i"
.
.111
J :. i! I~
.1.li
I~
1";'11
. g
. i
. -
co ~
. f
co c
r
2
"
.
ft
!
-
...
..
~
8:J:
~o
~,
=N
~:c
'Z))o
~o
~:J:
'"
",m
~:D
z-
"
;; ;I'
~I')
t,
,;m
j;Z
~o
20
~z
~Ro
1"
~3:
2C
~:JJ
n:D
11Im
~ ,..
;r-
~-
z'V
z .
';0
VI .
r
..
,
rl
"
,.
-.0
r-
)>
Z
C
c:
en
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
Sound intensity (sound pressure) is measured relative to a
standard reference level of 0.0002 microbar.
The instruments
used are equipped with weighting networks, corresponding to
scales A, B, and C, that alter the frequency response of the
sound meter in much the same manner as a stereo system equalizer
alters the frequency response of the stereo sound system.
In the
case of the sound meter however the frequency response is preset.
The relative response on each scale is shown in Figure A-l. The
essential difference is that the higher the letter scale the
greater the low frequency response.
In addition, the response of
scale C corresponds to the response of the human ear to loud
noise, thus it was the predominant scale used in collecting
Crusher noise data.
Scale C also provides the highest readings
of the three scales, allowing for a margin of error.
Both B ~, K and General Radio measurement equipment was
available for use.
It proved most appropriate to use a
calibrated General Radio model 1555-A Sound Survey Meter for
these measurements because of its portability.
The dB scale used provides an indication of the ratio of
sound intensity measured, relative to the reference level
(0.0002
mi crobar) .
The form of the relationship is
dB = 10 10810
Measured Level
Reference Level
I
~-
I
I
I
I -
c
""
or.
I <=
""
I
I
I-
I
I
I - -
-
- -
,-
I ;~
- -
h
I ,..
......
""
I
I
I
I
,
o
8
0-
-,/
/
; -
r
.
I
-0
~-
-.
-<
"3
-------~'":t
f. _
-.
"
...,
I
1:(
11;
a::
~
"
_ eLL
.---- --- ---- ---.-.-.
.t;),,{
'-U
__.i-~
lL
.-....
-.
..-
'-
.lu
--V}------
o
<:
o
____ 0
o
~
,
.
-,
t '.
c:--~~'1- \.
f~::"~-~ --'~ -- -~~.=-~c_:-- ~~_,-:~~l- '\\ -:-~~~'- ~-:-~ "L~-:-:-- -:----~~~ --~
__. - -::?E --:J\~_:'d:e :-,..-----:_-~=~~..:
- -->:~=::~- -.,
--~-~f~l\---\,--
---~
\ -
..:\., \
-::........, \, 0
..---:-----....:..... --.......-.--------- +--0
"--~ ------------- -~ --------
--- ". ;';l'" _..____~._.- _~~ ~~~------.---.~-
. - ~~ \. . "\ ""..
-------- '-x.-- -~.-----....... .---
:....~ ~ '"'-.
.---------.-.---- \-- -~- ----<.-...:..::------
-u\.___~~~_ ,,____
- - -~~=_~_~ ~---- - :..~' -=-i~~s~_ ~ cJ,:;
,
~
.-
~
.
"
------
. ---.- . ,. -
L
'.
(
"'-
'.
. -
,
,
._- -----.-------
"
"
c
"
~
------.- ----- ------ ------
I
~(l_=__.:=_S_,'Y2..d~ 3,2 ---3_!l.1A.':<!,3 ~__.....:..=-~__~__-~_~
o c 0 ceo ~
N + N "J -r::r
+ I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1::
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
APPENDIX B
EAGLE CRUSHER, MODEL JUMBO 1000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The
Crushing & Screening Plant
JUMBO 1000-DELPHI
4 Different Products...AII at Once!
, FIELD PROVEN... ON THE JOB!
.. · 4 Different Products-3 in dosed.circuit and a 4th in open..circuit.
· Field Proven - 200-250 TPH (high-silica limestone. gravel, traprock. as well as recycled
asphalt & concrete). .
· Exclusive "Counter-Shalt" Arrangement - maximizes efficiency of diesel engine. . .
RPM's remain constant. as speed of crusher is adjusted to job.
. No Field Assembly-simply block & crush.
FEATURES
· Crusher-33,OOO lb.. 3-stage. hi-chrome or alloy steel. fixed blow bar impact crusher.
· Feed Hopper-w/16 ft. vibrating grizzly feeder.
· Screen - 5 11. x 16 ft. double-deck. vibrating screen.
· Closed-Circuit Operation - retum conveyor. standard.
· Side Delivery Conveyors-all fold easily for travel.
For further information or to see our plants in full
operation in the field, on video tape. . . Write or Call:
(800) 25 EAGLE or (800) 83 EAGLE [Ohio]
TELEX: 987433
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Field Report: #12
JUMBO 1000
. . . THREE-iN-ONE PLANT
Now. . . in Delphi, Indiana
}
" TYPICAL FEED SIZE: .
14" CHUNKS OF HARD
DOLOMITE LIMESTONE
(THIS MACHINE HAS EASILY
HANDLED UP TO 32" SLABS
WITH NO DIFFICULTY.)
DISCHARGE: HIGHLY .
UNIFORM MINUS 1}12" .
PRODUCT PRODUCED
AT 200 TPH.
CBtJf'l'A"ll!V, COMPANY. INC.
4250 S.R. 309 . GAllON, OHIO 44833
"New Ideas. . , From a Century of Experience-
I
I
(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
Field Report: DELPHI, INDIANA
JUMBO 1000. . . THREE-IN-ONE PLANT
Job Specifications
Material: Limestone
Material Characteristics: Medium Hard & Abrasive
Feed Size: 24" x 0"
Discharge Product: Minus lYz"+ Minus 7/8" x 0"
Capacity: 200 TPH
Plant Specifications
Travel Height: 13' 6"
- Qperating Height: 13' 6"
Weight: 87,500 Ibs.
Power Supply: Diesel (325 hp.)
Hopper Opening Size: 16'
Vibrating Feeder Size: 40" x 15'
Crusher Size: RC 10 (44" x 421
Crusher Feed Opening: 42" x 31"
Discharge System: 42" to
DD Screen
Generator: 100 Kw
Tires: 12-10:00 x 20
Screen Size: 5' x 16'
Special Features
. Products - Makes 3 different products... simultaneously... in closed circuit with absolute sizing,
and a 4th product in open-circuit.
. No Field Assembly Required - Simply block and crush.
. Side Conveyors - Fold for travel.
For a copy of our color Recycling Brochure. . . and to see
our plants in full operation in the field, on video tape:
Call Toll Free: (800) 25 EAGLE or (800) 83 EAGLE (Ohio)
4250 S.R. 309. GAllON, OHIO 44833
''New Ideas. From a Century of Experience"
CBtJAJ:nI!V COMPANY. INC.
r
-
-
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
tl
I-JI
(.~
~I
.1
NOISE ANALYSIS OF SPARROW SAND MINE SITE
situate
South Street, Manorville, Town of Brookhaven, New York
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Prepared For:
Mr. Randolph Silverstein
Sparrow Mining Company
3743 White Plains Road
Bronx, New York 10467
Prepared By:
Richard E. Warren, Director
Thomas A. panasci, Assistant Planner
Inter-Science Research Associates, Inc.
Planning & Development Consultants
Butter Lane Corner, P.O. Box 897
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
Date Prepared:
May 1, 1985
INTE~OENCE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NOISE ANALYSIS OF SPARROW SAND MINE
situate
South Road, Manorville, Town of Brookhaven, New York
,
Prepared For:
Mr. Randolph Silverstein
Sparrow Mining Company
3743 White Plains Road
Bronx, New York 10467
Prepared By:
Richard E. Warren, Director
Inter-Science Research Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
The following presents noise data recorded on 16 April, 29
April and 30 April 1985 by Inter-Science Research Associates,
Inc. from the Sparrow Sand Mine property located along the
southerly side of South Road, Manorville, and within the
surrounding neighborhoods.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
SUMMARY:
During April 1985, the staff of Inter-Science Research
Associates, Inc. recorded noise levels throughout the Sparrow
Sand Mine property and in the adjacent surrounding neighborhoods,
in an effort to ascertain whether the existing sand mining
operation exceeds the limits established in'Chapter 50 of the
Code of the Town of Brookhaven, entitled "Noise Control".
Measurements were taken at a variety of locations, in order to
determine the impacts of the operation of the sand mine on the
surrounding properties. Locations sampled included:
o Intersection of South Road and Wading River Road;
o One-half way between intersection of South Road
and Wading River Road, and Sparrow Sand Mine site;
o Wading River Road and the entrance to the Sparrow
Sand Mine property;
o Along top edge of mining pit, within the Sparrow
Sand Mine property;
o At bottom of sand mining pit, approximately 100'
from sand screening operation;
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o At bottom of pit, approximately 15' from front-end
loader dropping large rocks into dump truck;
o At bottom of pit, approximately 20' from front-end
loader dropping sand into dump truck;
o 0.2 miles west of entrance of Sparrow Sand Mine,
along South Road;
o Intersection of Dayton Avenue and South Road;
o Within Pine Hills Country Club, northern section,
nearest Sparrow Sand Mine property.
Noise measurements were taken on April 16, 1985 between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., utilizing a Metrosonics db 307
Noise Dosimeter with a wind screen. All measurements were
recorded as A-weighted sound pressure levels for the various
locations from various sources. Similar re~dings were also
recorded on 29-30 April 1985, to obtain ambient noise levels for
the property when no machinery was operating, and for noise level
readings for the periphery of the site.
The acoustical computations performed by the Metrosonics db
307 measures the A-weighted sound level with Slow response.
The detector output is sampled at a rate of 8 samples per second.
Data recorded in the field included Average Sound Level ( Lavg)
~nd Maximum Sound Level (Lmax) over varying time periods.
The Noise Control ordinance of the Town of Brookhaven
requires that the noise limits for industrial uses be below the
following levels:
Maximum Permissible
Level, in dBA
Residential Property:
7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. 65 dBA
10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 50 dBA
Commercial Property (all times): 65 dBA
Industrial Property (all times): 75 dBA
Readings were taken approximately 150' from noise sources on
the site (when possible), and also along the property lines to
determine the noise levels crossing onto adjacent property. In
addition, standard noise readings were also recorded along rural
roadways within Bridgehampton, New York to assess the noise
levels of passing passenger vehicles and other types of trucks.
This data is also presented below.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
2
I
I
1
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FINDINGS:
(NOTE: Noise level readings were taken from a number of
locations within and around the periphery of the sand mine
site. Readings were taken over 10 minute intervals, using
A-weighted measuring. The results are as follows:
1. Ambient Levels: The ambient levels recorded on the
property were taken at 5:00 p.m. on 29 April 1985. Readings were
taken in the northern central portion of the property and at the
bottom of the sand mining pit. At both locations, readings were
recorded at 45.0 dBA with no mining, sorting or loading activity.
2. Noise Levels Around Periphery of Site During Operation:
The field data recorded for the noise analysis indicated that in
all cases, the sound pressure levels recorded around the
periphery of the property did not exceed the requirements of the
Noise Control Ordinance. A-weighted averages found the following
sound levels recorded for the various locations around the
periphery of the property:
NOISE LEVELS RECORDED ~ APRIL, 30 APRIL 1985:
Intersection South Road & Wading River Rd:
49.3 dBA
Entrance to the Sparrow Sand Mine:
45.0 dBA
Property border with Pine Hills Country
Club (east) adjacent to sand mine area:
45.~ dBA
Westerly Property Boundary Line:
45.0 dBA
In all cases, the noise levels recorded along the periphery
of the property were within the permitted limits as per the Noise
Control Ordinance of the Town of Brookhaven.
3. Noise Levels On-Site (within Mine) During Operation:
Readings were also taken within the sand mining pit and along the
access roadway leading to the bottom of the mine, to determine
the overall noise levels occurring on-site. Readings were taken
within 150 - 200 feet of noise sources, where possible. Findings
are as follows:
NOISE LEVELS ON-SITE DURING OPERATION - 16 APRIL 1-985
AND 30 APRIL 1985:
Lip of Sand Mine, Inside Property:
45.8 dBA
Bottom of Sand Pit, Front End Loader
loading sand into waiting dump truck:
50.4 dBA
Truck loaded with sand leaving pit up
access roadway within pit:
79.5 dBA
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sand Grading Operation (150' from
sand and gravel sorter):
45.0 dBA
Sand Truck waiting (Dieseling):
52.0 - 54.0 dBA
During instantaneous periods in the bottom of the sand
mining pit (approximately 60' below the surrounding property
grade), noise levels did exceed the maximum levels of 75 dBA:
(1) during periods of loading rocks into empty dump truck, and
(2) 40 ton dump truck accelerating up the hill that leads from
the bottom of the sand mine to the top. Levels recorded include:
Bottom of Pit, tractor loading rocks
into waiting truck:
79.2 dBA*
Bottom of Pit, sand and gravel sorter
(measured 50' away):
84.9 dBA
*measured while dropping rocks into empty truck.
The lip of the mine acts as an "amphitheater", and directs
the noise levels upward, rather than towards the adjacent
properties surrounding the mine. Therefore, the noise levels
recorded along the perimeter of the site all were less than that
found within the mine pit itself. Again, all recordings taken
measuring the sound levels crossing the property boundaries met
the Town's maximum permissible levels for noise generation.
4
I
I
I
,
I
,
-,
,
1
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 I S E ~ N A ~ Y S 1. S - F 1. ~ L g
SHE E T S
------
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Da te: April 16, 1985
Proj ec t: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noi se Source: Traffic
Description: Intersection of South Street & Wadinq
River Road
Distance to Noise Source:
75 ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 9:05 a.m. Time Completed: 10:05 a.m.
~otal Time during Test Run: 1.0
lKizmclms/hours
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
49.3
dBA
83.4
dBA
NOTES:
4 dump trucks passed intersection
28 cars passed by intersection
. Data Recorded By: ~ tL p~'.
Date: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NQl~E ~~~LI~lS-rl~!!D ~!!~~T~
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.o. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET. MANORVILLE. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: l!=;t R~sidp.ncp. on Oavton ~VP-T'Jll~
Description: (West of Sand Minel
Distance to Noise Source: N/A ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 10:15 a.m.Time Completed: 10:25 a.m.
-
Total Time during Test Run: 10
minu tes 1~1IlC'S<
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
45.0 dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
83.0 dBA
NOTES: 5 cars passed by site causinq elevated peaks levels
Da ta Recorded By :~_..., q /? ~ :
Date: 16 ADril1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.!'!O.!.~E AN~LX~.!.S-F'!'~~Q ~!!E~!~
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Da te: 16 April 1985
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noi se Source: Vehicles traveling along South Street
Description: (entrance to sand mine)
Distance to Noise Source: 25-30 ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 10:30 a.m~ime Completed: 10:40 a.m.
~otal Time during Test Run:
10 minutes~~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
45.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
82.9
dBA
NOTES:
Rich noise levles when cars passed site. No trucks passed
nrnnertv durina Deriod of testinq~
Da ta Recorded By: ~ Cf J?._..............-...
Da te: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~Q!~E ~~AL.!~!S-F!E~g ~!!E~TS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Da te: 16 April 1985
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source:
Front end loader
Description: Loadinq sand into waitinq truck"
Distance to Noise Source:
20
ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 11:00 amTime Completed: 11:05 a.m.
-
Total Time during Test Run:
5
minu tes l>h<:mrs
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
50.4
dBA
84.3
dBA
NOTES:
One truck passed by.
Data Recorded By: ~ Q f./"._--,-'
Date: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
....,.,.---
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 1. SEA N !L X ~ 1. S - [ 1. E !! Q S!! E ~ T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Bottom of mine pit - machinery
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
83 ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 11:10 am Time Completed: 11:20 am
-
Total Time during Test Run: 10
minutes/""""~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise.Level (Lavg):
47.1
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
83.1
dBA
NOTES: 2 trucks drove out of pit. Recordinqs taken near two sand
sorters.
Da ta Recorded By: ~ t( ~ -,\-_,-^--
Date: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
liOl~E Ali~Lr~l~-!:l~!!.D S!!.E~T~
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Da te : 16 April 1985
proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Front end loader loading larae rocks onto waiting truck
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
15 ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 11:25am Time Completed: 11:30 am
Total Time during Test Run:
minu tes ~1I1A;
5
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
79.2
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
98
dBA
NOTES:
One truck passed by.
Da ta Recorded By: ~ a
;;:.. A
Date: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!i.Q.I~E ~!i~.!!Y~.!.~-FI~L!2 SH~~TS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
proj ec t: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noi se Source: Bottom of sand mine pit, measurinq sand and qravel sorter
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
25 ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 11:35 am Time Completed: 11:45 am
~otal Time during Test Run:
10- minutes/~%Z
~ .RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
dBA
84.9
87.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
NOTES:. nnjlilo ~rll~lc ;tnn nnp. t:TP.lrt"nr DA.!H::f~d bv.
Da ta Recorded By: -;tt~<- {L;::. .~....:....- -
Da te: 16 Aoril 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!iQI~~ ~NA~Y~I~-FIELg Sli~ET~
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Proj ect: SPARROW MINmG COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Li'C of min@ (hiah@!:!:t elevation) oointina towards mine
Description:
Dist.ance to Noise Source:
800 ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 11:50am Time Completed: 12:00 pm
~otal Time during Test Run:
10
minutes~~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
45.8 dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
83.0 dBA
NOTES:
One truck and one car passed by.
Data Recorded By: ~ cZ ~~.
Date: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
rl
I
,I
I
I
I
II
i.
~
'I
:.
I
I
I
,I
:.
I
I
NQl~~ ~~~~xsl~-f.lE~Q. s1i~~!S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Da te: 16 April 1985
proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE. TOWN OF BROOKIlAVEN
Noise Source:
Along property line adjoining Pine Hills Country Club
Description:
pointing towards mine pit.
Distance to Noise Source: 800+
ft. (approx)
Time Recordings Initiated: 12:201'lll Time Completed: 12:30 p.m.
Total Time during Test Run:
minutesMmIlJCG
10
DATA RECORDED ~ TESTING:
Average Noise. Level (Lavg):
dBA
45.0
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
dBA
76.6
NOTES:
H;ah lp.vp-l~ frnm man hammerina behind eauipment.
Da ta . Recorded By: ~. ~ tc. tt7 ev.--' .
Da te: If - .l.kJS
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!'iQ!~E AN!.!!X.S!~-F!f.L.Q ~Hf.f.TS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: 1 larqe truck accellerating up hill cut 'Of sand pit.
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
6-8
ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: N/A
Time Completed:
-
Xotal Time during Test Run: N/A
minutes/hours
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
79.5
dBA
dBA
NOTES:
Data Recorded By: ~ tf ;7~.
Da te: 16 A'Oril 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~Q1.S~ ~N!!!.!.S1.S-!:1.ELJ2 ~HE~!~
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 29 April 1985
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: 40 yard (?) dump truck (idling) waiting
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
75 ft. (approx.)
Time Recordings Initiated: 4:45 p.m. Time Completed: 4:50 p.m.
~otal Time during Test Run:
5 minu tes ~!!~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
52-54
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
75.8
dBA
NOTES:
Da ta Recorded By: ---;1(./'7., '^-'-- tl
f?--
.........-,.."'\,.,.
Date: 29 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!:!Q'!'S~ ANA!!..!.S.!.S=.F.!.~~D .2.!!.E~TS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 29 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location:
SOUTH STREET. MANORVILLE. TOWN OF FHl('>nT<H~ V'R'"
Noise Source:
Ambient noise level
Description: No operation of eauicment within sand
mine.
Distance to Noise Source:
N/A
ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 5:00 p.rn.Time Completed: 5.15 p m
Total Time during Test Run:
15 minutes/hours
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise.Level (Lavg):
45.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
45.0
dBA
NOTES:
Data Recorded By: ~_ CL (l ~.
Da te: .:z.q ~P"'; 1 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!!.QI~~ ~N~~X~1.S-r1.ELQ
SHE E T S
- - --
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Da te: 30 April 1985
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noi se Source: Sand sorter & loadinq
Description: measured from lip of mine
Distance to Noise Source: 200 ft. (approx)
Time Recordings Initiated: 9:30 am Time Completed: 9:40 am
Xotal Time during Test Run: 10 minutes/~...
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise.Level (Lavg):
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
45.0
dBA
74.7
dBA
NOTES:
Da ta Recorded By: -?C- ...-.-... t:L PG<-.~
Date: 30 April 1985
Sheet of
NOI~~
~!!A~X.~I~-FI~~~
~!!~~!~
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, ~
Planning & Development Consultants
P.o. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date:
30 April 1985
prooertv boundarv
pine Hills.
Description:
line - Dointina towards sand oit adiacent to
250
ft.
. -
Total Time during Test Run:
Time Completed: 9:55 am
minutes/J:fQJll'PS
10
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):.
45.0
65.2
dBA
dBA
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
A~~roximatelv 50' away from 9:30 a.m. reading.
f/~'
Da te: 30 April 1985
Sheet
of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 I SEA N A L Y 2 ~ S - F I ~ L D SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date:
30 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location:
SOUTH STREET. MANORVILLE. TOWN OF BROOKHA YEN
Noise Source: Sand aradina oDeration
"Description: taken fran lip of mine pointing towards
pit.
Distance to Noise Source:
l-;n
ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 10:15 am Time Completed: 10:25 am
-
~otal Time during Test Run: 10
minutes/~t1ft
DATA RECORDED ~ TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
45.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
74.1
dBA
NOTES:
Da ta Recorded By: ~~ I( tf?~."
Da te: 30 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N Q I SEA N A ~ Y S I ~ - FIE ~ Q SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Da te : 30 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Loca t ion: SOUTH STREET. MANORVILLE. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noi se Source: Entrance to sand mine, South Street
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
N/A
ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 10:40 am Time Completed: 10:50 am
Total Time during Test Run:
15
minu tes /~Mlr~
~ RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
dBA
45.0
55.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
NOTES: Elpv;::\~p.n lpvp-l frnm ~;tnd tr\1~k D;:t~~;na hv mnnitor.
Da ta Recorded By: ~ <<.-- f?c-_~ _"
Da te: 30 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
NOl~~ A!~~!~l~-!:l~~Q ~!!E~TS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, ~
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 1'932
(516) 537-1904
Date: .
Project: __....._
--....
Location:
- . ... - .
--
Noise Source:
Description:
. - --
Distance to Noise Source:
~ ft.
Time Recordings Initiated:
~otal Time during Test Run: ~
l": .. r -/hours
. Time Completed: 10:05 A.m.
~ RECORDED ~ TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
NOTES:
,!II
Lf/
Data Recorded By: ~
~
,/)
----
Sheet of
. -.-'......--
....:':, J t'-;'~. ..t:"t".. '-: .:~....l...... .. '1-....:...~.t"',,,...-<I..,. _"';\~_ . '.
-......1I~:Sott1"-
dBA
dBA
Date:
----
....'W.ItI!l..
-.....~ilt,;~~~..
. '-'.', ,. "',,"'~ '. .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
I
I
I Bennen Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
I Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
;;0- ..,
,.;:; ..
.... '
SCOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765.1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
SouthoJd, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765.1823
September 5, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, New York 11935
Re:
Site Plan for
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
SCTM # 1000-83-4.5
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Grim:
This is to ask you to comply with our environmental
consultant's recommendation that you complete Part III of
Long Environmental Assessment form.
the
A copy of the
convenience, along
form.
consultant's letter is enclosed for your
with a copy of Part III of the Assessment
This office is sending a copy of the last revised site plan
to the consultant to see if it answers their questions.
If you have questions about the enclosed material, please
speak with Valerie Scopaz of this office.
Very truly yours,
~~.:cr &2-~~t2.-:/tI<"'
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. }7" ~
Chairman
cc:
Gerard P. Goehringer, Zoning Board of Appeals
Charles Voorhis, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates ~
1../
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
fK ~
CRAMER. V06P.RH,
ENVIFlONMENT~ .\ ~y
OCtA TES
G CONSULTANTS
September 3, 1991
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Southold Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold,:-lY 11971
Re:
o~~gon Road Recycling Co.
S M No: 1000-83.3-4.5
Dear Benny:
We are in receipt of your letter of August 12, 1991, requesting that we complete a
review of the proposed prQject including review and correction of the Part I EM,
cOlilpletion of the Part II EAF, and consultation as to how to proceed 'With review of this
project in accord with the State Environmental Quality Re\<iew Act.
Please be advised that we have reviewed the documentation forwarced to :his office.
A copy of the corrected Long EAF Part I, and the completed Long EAF P:rt IT a ~e included
as a..1 attachment to this letter. In addition, we have inspected the site and offer l.1e
following information with regard to review procedures.
The site is presentlv in active use by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., for tbe ~urpose of
exc~''1ation and drainage contracting, soil screening and offices. This use is being conducted
in a:cord with a previously approved site plan as well as Zoning Board of Appeals
authorization. The proposed use involves the addition of recycling facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid removal, crushing or
cu tUng) and shipping off the site.
In terms of existing site and environmental resources, soils and vegetation bave b.een
modified. The site is predominantly rock, earth and fill; however some landscaping has been
completed near the road frontage. There were no significant vegetation or wildlife resources
identified. The site is within Groundwater Management Zone IV and is in the northem
border of the Water Budget Area designated by SCDHS. The depth to groundwater is
approximately 60 feet, and groundwater beneath the site migrates north. It is noted that
lUtrate and aldicarb contammation have been identified in the vicinity of the site, and th~re
is a landfill upgradient of the site which is under investigation to determine impact on tl:~
aquifer. It is suspected that the landfill site may have caused groundwater degradation.
,
The site is zoned for industrial use.~ The area surrounding the site, east to Cox's
Land, west approximately 750 feet to Depot Land and south to North Road is also zoned
industrial. There are intermittent industrial uses in this area. The area north of Oregon
Road is zoned. A.C' district. Land use conflicts of the transition from industrial to . A-C
district were considered by the Planning Board in the previous site plan approval which
required a 100 foot setback for the facifi!)' from Oregon Road.l\ The subject application
should also be reviewed in the context of minimizing impacts from this transition. The roads
Pall" 1 0(3
54.2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD. MILLER PLACE. NY 11764 (516) 331.1455
G:0-d -S..?oO"'!!l:"Sl:;:.t '""=" ~I""'--_ ..
~ . ---^'~~W~~O 6e:~t I~~ t6-9 -d3S
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
'I
/
O/'Cion Road Recycling
EnYlronmental Review
in the area include Oregon Road (east-west minor road to north), Cox's Lane (north-south-
minor road to west), Depot Lane (north-south minor road to east), and North Road (east-
west 4 land dividec highway to south). These roads are presently undenltilized; however,
expa.nsion industrial uses in the area and potential confhct with residential street traffic
shodd be considered in connection with tbe proposed project.
The Town Board has considered this action in the authorization of a Recycling and
Salvage Facilirv under Town Code Section 48-1. The use is consistent solid waste
management geals of reducing the waste stream through recycling; however, impacts with
regard to the specific use must be considered. The Town Board recognized this and
included many conditions of the approval for this use. These conditions are included in a
Conditioned Negative Declaration for the use dated March 1. 1991. The nine (9) conditions
included in the oetermination provide the Planning Board with a basis for review of the
project.
Based upon review of the conditions, and the information presented to date, we find
that a Part III Long EAF should be prepared to address concerns with regard to the specific
sit~ use. The. I.:ong E~ Part,IU is rec,ommended as a means of address,ing ~pecific concerns
prior by provldmg additional mformatlon necessary to render a Dctermmation of .
Significance with regard to this action. The Part II EAF indicates the impact areas. in
addition, specific requests for information are keyed to the nine (9) Town Board conditions
3. follows:
V-l)
3)
4)
5)
7)
8)
9)
2)
n.. applicant should provide a detailed site plan indicating the location of all
structural site improvements (including concrete/asphalt crusher. As of the date of
this letter, we have not received this information.
Preliminary review of the noise data indicate possible impact due to noise levels. The
location of the equipment must be known to determine levels at locations from the
machinery. In addition, sound barriers (if needed) or sound reduction equipment
which may be available as an accessory on the equipment should be explored, In
addition, we find no information concerning dust-emissions from equipment as
required by the Town Board.
The applicant should provide a covenant regarding hours of.operation. An update of
the status of this mitigation measure required by the Town Board should be provided.
The source of recycling material should be indicated in order to assess compliance
with previous conditions of the operation.
A program for mitigation of.noi~e. dust, odors, and llectors should be provided by the
applicant in order for the, Town to have a means of dealing with complaints and Issues
should they arise. !
The basis for vehicle trip ends should be provided. The peak hourly trip generation
should be indicated. 11'1 addition, the primary hours of expected truck ingress and
egress to the site shoulP be indicated.
The status of the wastooilcontainmentshed'approval should be indicated.,.Plans for
construction of this facility should be provided.
The means of disposal of collected fluids should <be-indicated. If an industrial waste
scavenger is proposed to be used, the name of the scavenger should be provided.
The applicant sliould provide a covenant regarding alIowed access to the site by Town
Officials a~d/o~ :e~itimately de;ignat~d Town representatives. An. update of. the
status Of,s mlti?,~aOll measure requIred by the Town Board should be prOVIded. .
6)
~~
,
CRAMER V I R . SOCIATES
ENVIRONMENT '*~ ~~ " \i~G CONSULTA:>lTS
:&:0-d
PaGe 2 of3
~.~o~s~ ~ $1 ~~OO^'~~W~_~O
€'I t : to- t
I~.::i
16-9 _--':'3S
I
I
Ort8on Road Recycling
EDvlroDmtntal RevIew
I The information requested above should berrovided by the a'pplicant. Information
~ Id be submitted in the basic format of a Part n Long EAF I'roVlding a discussion of the
ificance of the impact and proposed mitigation to minimize the impact. I believe that
!apPlicant is best able to provide this information for review by the Board. If you wish
" to review the submitted documentation, we would be pleased to provide a cost
ate to review the material once submitted.
I. Thank y!'u for the opportunity to provide you with this review, and please do not
Itate to call if you have any questIons.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Very truly YO!lrs,
a~ "-
/ u://~; ,~/
\". .
arles J. V rhis, AICP
IR. v~'\ JASOCIATES
i~MENT~~~G CONSULTANTS
PIlge30r3
"0:1
'IS .. ':Jo eo '$: "!!!: 1:::1
'3 "5! '-I _, 00 "='",.. .. ..... W "0 -' ==-
't t : 'to- 't
I:el.:l
t6 9.
d3S
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX B
RECYCLING &
MANUFACTURING, INC.
P.O. Box 31118' Amarillo. Texas 79120-1118' Plant Site Address: 12100 \-40 East/79101
June 20, 1991
Mr. Donald Grim
o~egon Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box.300
cutchogue Long Island, NY 11935
Dear Mr. Grim:
Thank you for your recent inquiry on the Excel 2500 and
Excel 2200 Recycling plants.
In answer to your questions regarding the operating
noise levels of this equipment our reply is limited to tests
which are performed at our research and development site in
Amarillo, Texas. This testing is conducted under controlled
operating circumstance and is not representative of
operations under any other type of conditions. These test
results indicate the noise levels to be minus 85 decibels.
It is Excel'S position that noise levels of our
equipment are dependent on a number of variables such as the
materials being processed, the power source (i.e. diesel or
electric), ect. These variables and the relative noise
levels cannot be predicted by Excel.
sincerely Yours,
"--1'YL l1u.- ~
Myra Avant,
Project coordinator
.
cc: Matt Garth
Wayne Schrandt
Office - (806) 335-3737 '
U.S. 1-800-858.4002
FAX # 806.335-3949
I.
I
I
I
I
~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
. .
- .
51'
\'
t
13' 6"
o
JOB SPECIFICA TlONS:
Material: Concrete w/steel rebar, Asphalt, Limestone
Discharge Product: Minus 2.5" X 0"
Design Rated Capacity: 200-400 TPH Approx.
PLANT SPECIFICA TlONS:
Travel Height: 13' 6"
Operating Height: 13' 6"
Weight: 110,000 Ibs.
Power Supply: Cat. 3406 (402 HP)
Hopper Opening Size:19' X 7'10"
Vibrating Feeder Size: 56" X 18' with adjustable grizzly
Crusher Size: Excel 25
Crusher Feed Opening: 57" X 37"
Tires:ll:00 X 22.5 (12)
SPECIAL FEA TURES:
. Low-Profile Design - 13' 6" travel height and 51' length permits highway transport.
. Hydraulic Lift-Mechanism - 6 hydraulic lift cylinders front, center and rear ft
~
JEXClEl ]a;BCO(Oa(B5fBCl4(O(O~
C~USHERS Excel Recycling & Mfg., Inc.. Amarillo, Texas 79120
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
.
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
I
.
.
I
EXCEL 2500 LOW-PRO
CRUSHING SYSTEM
Typical Feed Size:
CONCRETE AND CONCRETE
PIPE WITH STEEL REINFORCING
Discharge:
PRODUCT
Call us for a recommendation and
quotation for your particular needs.
We design custom plants and systems
for unique applications.
'.
~:....: m,~ ~... .....r;('" . ~'"':..~.:,r .'~4.-~""
:~: ,,,,.~.,,,......,,,,- ., ,.
"\ .""'........ .' ,.' "../I.~.,~"'.-:......l ,
..r",~.. ~"';" '.9 -'" ............ .>,.-. -"".....
~' ,'~''; ,.,.,.~.,C...""'.:.;>"....f.............- -t'':.....
.............~ ..~..V~......_...Y"'_._;.r..., . ~
..._~....<-,--~~' .><.:i"1 :V~:":--';::' .'\..
'~i""..;,...':'(' -"_~~.;:::.' ;:::-...........A
.. ....- ". #-.~r.. '.\dC:"IlT1 f..........,-~_.
'"" "&~"....1 .~"""y. -....~_. ". ~;.......~--: ,..,..,..,
~., - ""';~-\ ,t::I", :--""''''7)...' d.1I';oc ",,-...,,~,,:.. .:~.
~. ~ '1';$..... '< ~-." . - .. "
,. .. _ - _......,.ot. -_
~r _ ...._~..-I- ~J' "1"",";"0 r,.. -'11">:>-
....., . ' ,,,'..,. i .... ::-...~d. ,...)',.:.... .;. :
.. ~ ........,J~~~-Jt....~--V --,~ .> ~:'~~
j... .. ~.;...~..~.L.j ;:1 ;..;.~.. ._~;,;.._
')''''..',_.' ~."'" "', -^r.-"'/,
. ~ ." . l' "'/ ...~ .,,~.... r '. U'
.EXCrElL J;]18c).OD(8~),~3DI-= ~\c) c)<~
CRUSHERS Excel Recycling & Mfg., Inc.' Amarillo, Texas 79120
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
Crushing For The Future ...
EXCEL 2200 LOW-PRO
CRUSHING SYSTEM
..
.7' 5-
JOB SPECIFICA TIONS:
Feed size. Reinforced Concrete, Brick & Block. Asphalt, Wood, Stone,
Contaminated Materials.
Discharge Product - 200 TPH
PLANT SPECIFICA TlONS:
Crusher. Excel 15 Impact
Crusher Opening. 42 'x31 .
Vibrating Grizzly Feeder - 46 'x16'
Step Grizzly Bars
314" Steel Hopper
3.Axle Chassis
Power
CAT 3406 Diesel w/100KW Gen Set
42' Discharge Conveyor
11.00x22.5 Tires
Operators Catwalk w/Control Cab
Eriez Magnet
SPECIAL FEA TURES:
Designed for quick set up, completely self-contained unit, (4) hinged support legs.
LOW-PROFILE - CRUSH AND MOVE
FIELD PROVEN
.__~JEXC1E!L ~J t3(B(ID@t3fS5~t34(Q)(o);2
CRUSHERS or 806.335.3737
Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc.
P.O. Box 31118 . Amarillo, TX 79120 .
.., A'LL /'JEW - C~"l.J::),'lino .='.Jl J-;i~ J:'.:~:.;t~ HD
-
I EXCEL SUPER 2200 LOW-PRO
RECYCLING SYSTEM
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, : I ! I
I I
: '1 i I
i i' i
- ''':;''':;;~~;:i;''': .:.~: ~.,\'(~.: ~~.;,~ ~ /: . '.. . '.
- "
, ,
. . . -
'......,'J'";:") '7) 11 '~ ., "Yl"l"/i'"'I ~"\ ",,'1 "
fJ'\' l~~~J.":'a<l(]Ji.J\j lJ \'>:iI \\.g':"!~fj
.
ENVIRONMENTAL
RECYCLING SYSTEMS
Typical Feed Size:
BUILDING
RUBBLE
Call us for a recommendation and
quotation for your particular needs.
We design custom plants and systems
for unique applications. '
Discharge:
PRODUCT
IEVC~rJ 1 .') ')'("" :') /3'!'-:') 1 ("I'C)J)
U\. ~g. -J [.:J,c,..i1 \, ~c:J(9~(9c~:J\ j,' C-Z:I
C~USHERS or 806-335-3737
Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc.
P.O. Box 31118' Amarillo, TX 79120,
1,\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
jiJest Texas
3000 ^ rM ,:'uu
p, 0, Bex 61"47
MlfJland, T.,., ;9?l1,:~J7
(9\6) 563'1~63
1.800.284.2595
DATE: 7h,//'?J I
, ,
NO. OF PAGES: 7
(Including thi5 pagel
DEL!vER TOr \\JAY,,-l.E....
COMPj:lNY: --= ~c...E... \.~
FAX NUMEER: (?O lO) 3 ~'S; - 2,c.t4-'1
FROM:_:!:lA\JE... ~~r..,E.'R-
REFERENCE: o4-() (" D '";:J) ':I: -r p.. E. l-..lC.., :c~E.
MESSAGE:
'f:C) U-CHAy:r:1-.l. G. ?~ c.:...g <;, C-OV E. R.. SO \...11>L6>-
(1'..lO:r:':;S') :"Dk"tA FOIL A 34-0..\n....F, """J)1:TA
~~ C",r:Wf:_ Cd. \~C) ''(,'vtJ\. ~ ~f(('Y~::r:HArty
1: 1. 'l- r-"'b \;. f' . '\ \-+ r~..~.~__ I'y l' 1: (A L '":b,.." T ~
Q,..- <Z..f...VfLE..-~ E.k. \T AT I \IE.. O~ 'IQ.UR.. E IV 6r Nc.s..
'K.G...~ ~\Lb:r:N.G,' 4-iO y\-lf ~
'\\4 f= _ b.ll 0' . "b '"":l:>:r: 'r A. '.f"
_ '-'C_~ _ ) \}./ '
::L. t-J \I E:. ~ ,-r r-, AT:!:' ~ G.. -:i:.. T' .
\~OO KF'fVIo.. ~RO~
AR.E.. <s,n: LL
~. c.. .
. ~'."'-'.'--
STEvE.
A. 'K..E L..9~
p.., tv.... A '~Cr:. L \.. ()
")
-----..
-----.-..-.---
IF VOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL 01" THE PAGES, PLEASE CONTACT US
1f'1MEOIA'r~LY AT 1-600-284-2~9:>. We are tr.ln!lmJ.lUng frulIl tlll
NEC/NEFAX.
TO REPLY VIA FAX, DIAL DIRECT TO 915-563-1871.
,
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-~:".SS:Jl TMI - EtlG!r IE AI'J::l CQI~F' F':::~F DATE: 07/::1/9.
...: ,j - Gf~N ='~T E. r,JG I r,~~ FERFORM'::'NCE TUIE: 13;:;7:1~
":.~ ..::=-~ L" T/\ J~J CF-;Y ~iFLD HYDRA GOY GEN SEr-DIE
'.
- ".17 :2-02 ST(.:.N ,rlY GE~. 315 .:W @ 18::C0 RF'tl W/O F~_~J =,0 :-:E:RTZ
. -.;;.:;:. C"-- C4 - :;JWND (N01SE) r.'ATA - ME.CHAt~: CAL @- e. ~ i":oEJ) . * * :;: ~ * :;: :;: :;:
L'lJ::' -". ...:.
":;:-.... ;:'ER OV2RALL. Cl3CF C8CF 0"'-- 08 G8CF DEleF OBCF OBCf'
._ w.- ~ t'\1_r"
~'~'l;: CENT SOUND 63HZ l'2;.HZ =~t:)HZ ~0ZHZ 1Ql~0HZ 2e;t,Q1HZ 40:ilCDHZ 8\)12I0r-
, ,~ ~.C~D D8(A) DB DB DB DB DE< 09 toEl DB
~. . - :~'LJ 99 e~ 87 0.7 91 94 92 88 9:
- - .,....'
-....... 01" 99 a3 87 27 91 94 92 88 9:
.'--.:" . ~
:~:; E'1 99 e-' El7 87 91 94 92 88 9:,
;,
:.:.:J 83 I:f? 8:: 87 67 91 94 9~ FlA 95
...
:-:~~ 7/;> '19 e.'3 67 67 91 94 92 88 95
-.-."'\ 70 99 63 87 87 91 94 92 88 9::
;.,._...J
:':::J 64 99 93 97 87 91 94 92 88 95
. ...... ~.7 9'-; 8.J en 87 9~ 94 92 88 95
- --
. '. ~ ~',1 99 83 e,7 57 91 :r~.____ .. ,9'2. 88 <;=-
....._. . ...
~ -. 44 <r'i 81. 87 to I '71 S'':; ';'2 E;~ 9~
, :e -:::-9 8.3 e7 87 91 94 92 89 9::
-, ,
- , , , qr; ,l'e, a: 67 ql 'i4 92 ea <;:
...-.... ...."....
.:." r.l'1 ~'2, 81 81 91 'i .\ "'~ ~o 'i~.
.;. ~.l ' - c'.
L..:: 19 99 e- El'! 87 91 <;'4 92 se 'i :.
."
.~ ..,. 97 a~ ~ . ~:"\ 89 92 9<) 86 9:';,
-'" "" --' oj
6 97 81 8~5 p.=- 89 9:2 90 86 9'"
.....
~~~s ~.ErJTER~ TO CGNrINUE
1-:..l.P \ ;--f." j j
NE'XT
;":'CF'2 (f'P:2,)
TRAN~ ~N~C COCE , C4 )
hX! r(f'f4) r,F;ILhN(i-I-:,)
UNIT TYPE ( E l
lNIJEX(Fr'i)
,
--
-
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-CH.GG::ll TMI - ENBINE tZ.~:; CO:.W F'ERF O';TE: 07/::!.1/9:
1t~:3 - GEN SE:T ENGINE: F"EF\F'ORroiA!'JCE TIME: 1::".: ~7:::r
::~"'6B flr TA Ji-i DF:Y MFLD HyDRA GOV GEN SET-DIE
: M'~ 718-2:2 S fAilO<<." GEN ::'.15 KW @ 161<liZl RPrl WID FP,N 6'-1 hERTZ
!N!=O COtE 04 - <$OU!\.D (NOI!::E) DATA - MECHANm~n~. 9 FEeV * * * * * * ~. :l:
GEN PER OVERALL GBCF OBCF OKF OBCF OE'CF OBCF OBCF OE<Cf
F'~JR CENT !iOUND 6~HZ l2 ~,HZ 2~~HZ ~,12l0HZ It'JeC!lHZ ::~,";z)HZ 4QlQlOHZ S0:oiLI,
,'w I ne:on 'Irq Q ) OR 01'( O'~ Ol'l nl'l nF< Ol'l 01<
:"il5 100 87 79 82 813 79 82 81 76 e:
::,Ij~ <;~ 87 79 82 80 79 82 81 76 e:
2E.~ e9 97 79 8:, 8:l- 79 82 81 76 8:
260 6~ 87 79 co" 8;<) 79 82 81 76 8:
~-
240 76 r;, 79 82 8121 79 82 81 76 8:
:!~0 70 87 7"J 82 80 79 82 81 76 8:
:::~QJ t,4 e, 7~ B2 Bill 7"1 6:: el 76.. . .... ~e:
.lc'::!I :.17 87.. 79 62 80 79 82 81 76 e:
l!>~ ~1 87 79. ?2 80 79 .. .._~.6_~__._. _.. 81 7/;0 8:
-
1-l]J 44 87 79 8" 80 7"1 82 81 7f:, 8:
!:~ :.8 87 79 82 8lZ1 79 8~ 81 7= e:
."
1Z:1l .,..., 87 79 8: f..~ 79 82 81 7e 6.
-'-
&0 25 87 79 e: 80 79 8~ 81 76 8.
"'-
t.2 19 87 79 82 B~ 7~ 62 81 76 8.
41tJ ,~ a~. 77 E0 78 77 eo 79 74 €,
...-'
2~ 6 85 77 E~ 78 77 80 79 74 E:
~RES5 <ENTER~ TO CCNT:N~E
NEXT TRAN: INFO CODE I ~4 )
HELP(PF:) ACF2(PF3) EXIT(PF4) RETURN\PF')
lllJl T TYF'E I E
INDEX(F'F9)
,
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I [<IEXT iRAN: 11,;=0 CODE C 0::> )
~ELe{FF1) ACF:CPFS) EXITIPF4) REiURNlPF51
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~)..,.-
HII - ENG ll<,:: A"'D (;wtiF< F<ET,F
DATE: 07/:!<1/9
TH1E: 1:,: ;,8:0'
..3~G~Ul
~3 - a~N SET ENGINE
~~C~B D1 TA JW
..~~719-0: 57ANDBY
: ~~~ ~ CODE t~).;~ - (s00.:.;
~EN ~ER OVE~A~L
~Wk CENT SOUNO
~<~ LC~D ~B(A)
::1 ~
::~:)
:::.~
~60
:.:.~
~:i:l
~~~
:".:i-J
:"6~
:~~
~::n
It''
~.::l
t,2
..,"1'1
~'"
:2
p. t::RF :.;:-=~MA~JCE
lJRY :-1FL:) HV[ot'.:A GO''! GEN SE::'(-Dle:
GEN :1~ ~w 8 1SCC RPM W/C FAN 60 HERTZ
(N{J1=,U L,..'A - Mi':.L.'rAr.J!::AL;)~49.2 F::Ei) *:1<
C;CF 08CF u~Cr U~Cf OBCF Q8CF
63HZ 125HZ 2S~HL ~~~HZ 10~2Hl 20C~HZ
DE< DB D:. DB C'B C'B
:I< * :I.
OE:'CF
1l1i)00HZ
OS
* * *'
OBC:
6~l<le:
PEl
10"' 81 7... 77 74 69 76 76 72 7:
95 81 74 77 74 69 76 7!o 72 7:
87 - . 74 :'1 74 6"1 7f:> II:> 1'2 I~
o_
S- 81 74 77 74 69 76 76 72 7:
,
76 81 74 77 74 69 76 76 72 7~
70 81 74 77 74 69 7b 71:> 72 7:
64 81 /4 77 74 69 76 76 72 7:
~7 81 -, . 77 74 <:.9 76 76 72 ,
I~
!,1 81 74 77 74 ,1::.9 76 76. ' 72 7:
44 8i 7 :~ 77 ~4 6"1 76 76 -/2 7'
;:.8 e1 74 77 74 <:.'~ 7!o 76 72 7
:;.2 61 74 77 74 69 76 76 12 'l
~5 el 0/4 77 74 09 76 76 72 7
19 81 74 71 7" 69 76 76 n 7'
,~ 79 7'" 75 72 1:7 74 74 7e 7'
... .,;'
0 79 72 75 72 67 74 74 70 7
;~55S ~ENTER' TO CONTINU~
Wl'iH TYFE. ( .0
lNDEXCF"F9)
I
I
,. .,. :;5':'l l;-: t - El\:G! ~;E ;;Nl> CC:'.P F-'ERF
; _ GEN SET ENGIN~ ~~~FC~~ANCE
::?t 01 ~A:W DRY MFLD HyDRA GUV ~EN E~T-D1E
'-~7:S-=J STM~D~Y GE~ ~:5 ~~ @ lS~3 RPM WID FA~ 60 HERTZ
I'.::' ;:.:;:;E '2i:; - SGU:',P :.~!8iSE) "... ~ - :::,O,,;,'..:ST ("'T4.9 ":::E'::) l! ~
.::;'.; PER C\"~~:ALL CSCr-: OBCF OBCF OBer: OEtCF OBCF
A' CCNT S'JUND 6:':Ht l~::'HZ 2:SCHZ ~,ClilHZ 1l2l\a0HZ 2\':00HZ
LOAD Df; \ A) Nt DB DB DB DB DB
I"'~
I ::::J
- '--'
1_....
:,;)
:- :'~:1
I I ::;)
;':'J
I ".~
,_.0..
::)
I ...:'
-.,
-~
I
.- ~. :',::: ..... Et':T Et;;.:
:.:..:~
,.
l~~ ~~9 lZ~. H0:7 ~~4 l06 liB 1~1
';5 llll7 1!l)4 1e~ 1~4 ~'ZIQ lDe lel
89 1 Zi~' 1"'4 ll!.b 1(0 ,. lJ5 H:0 101j
8- l~o 103 lQ>5 l€3 Hle, 99 100
.>
70 l~o H~:, 1r;:)~ llil2 104 99 99
'Ie 1"::> 11il:2 1C4 11<)2 104 98 99
64 1~~ 11!lZ 1~4 1~1 H'J3 96 9S
.- ~~.+ .l~l ~n>- lr.2 10: 97 97
_I ... .... ...~
c , I''':\~ le~ _t()~. t.z~ Hl2 96 97
," ..-.J..... ..
44 1~'!. l~~ 1~2 '';:; llZl.!. 96 96
:2 ;.~2 ?'i lei -.- l:'~ 95 ~5
": ':.
- ~ l~l ';"8 l~~ 'i::: 1;);;) 94 9t.
..'-,
4. I: 120 -:;7 '79 "'7 91 Ci3 94
....'
l~ ::'~ 90 'is 9:0 98 92 9"
.'
1:- 9$ ~.~ 97 9:- 97 91 ~2
6 97 '14 9~ ~: 9S 9121 91<l
. .'
. -~
"TO cor.jT: f-;\jE
I,~.,,;: '. F F': )
r,J~xT "r~:c:~:": ~riF(l COL-E ( 213 )
ACF~{~F:l EXIT(PF4) R~IUkN:~~~)
u;'J I T 'fYr'E ( E
Ir.D~ X ( PF 9 )
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE:: C:7/:'1/91
1 1 ;~IO: 1 ::. : ~6 : 12
* * * * * * lit
DBCF. OBCf'
4(1)~l:lHZ Si21\:l0HZ
DEI DEI
96 E6
96 65
'?5 ~~.
9~ 84
94 84
94 8~.
93 e~
92 82
92 81
91 '21
co'" eO
. ~
9Z 79
89 -r.
I:>
69 77
87 76
85 7=-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-GKC:i8.81 T:'11 - ENGINS A~:D cu.:~. ~'l::.kF DA"E: C!l71:!.1/"j
,)8 - GE:, Sl:":T ErJG ItIE F'€:F:FOI':i'o';i\lCe: T HIE: 1::.; ~b.~.::
:';069 DI TA "lW pRY MF'LP ~IYL\R::I GOV GEI',J =,ET-LiIE
':~14 71G-02 S'rAND~t GEN 315 K~l 11 1800 RFM HERTZ
!NrO CCI;= 0"3 - ~Ur:D (NO!SS) DAIA - \:.)(HAUS 0 FEST :I: * * Ii' x t :t t
GEN F'ER OVERALL CE!-CF' Ot<CF 08CF 08CF OBCF OBCF OBCF OBCF
r'WR CEr~T SOUND 63HZ 12e,HZ ::S(!)HZ ~0ilJHZ 1000HZ 21iJ(/lI2iHZ 4121C!lr!lHZ 801210.
K\.j LOPD DE<(A) DB Des DB DB De LiB DB DB
-,. 10t:l 94 90 9::2 86 94 66 87 81 7'
.........J
3~Z 95 /14 90 9::2 87 '14 S6 86 81 7~
22Ql 89 93 69 92 87 <.{"t 86 66 80 To
26~ 83 93 89 91 86 'I:!: e::. 8::- 00 7:
::2.H~ 7e 92 ae '1121 86 92 84 8::1 79 7:
22~ 70 \9::2 67 90 . 85 92 84 84 78 7:
::e~ 64 \91 67 89 6S 91 83 84 78 7;
~~0 ~,7 ~l. e~ 89 84 '11 63 83 77 7'
l~C :-11 90 Be. ~:l ~~. 9Z> 0: 62 -.., !,'
, .
...... '-as .' 8::,--'- ....sT-.. 62 '. -- -'-'7 b' .. 6,
:421 44 s'? 67 89
1:2 :,8 sa 34 8:- ~,- U') 81 61 7'$ 6,
e""
l~~ ~..: S8 ro-" e~ ,,"' 88 8(1) 50 74 6
c"' -~
e~ ~,. 87 63 85 80 87 79 79 74 6
... -'
e,", j'1 86 82 E4 79 86 78 78 73 6
l,Z 13 85 S~ 8~ 78 e,=, 77 77 71 6
:?J..'?\ 6 .83 /9 61 'l7 83 75 7~ 70 6
=~ESS <SNTER~ TO CONTINUE
N::XT I'Rt:.N: 1;;1-0 CullE. I (:j,:, )
HELPlPF11 ACF2IPF3) EXITIPF4) PETUR~(PF~)
GI'l1T TYPE ( E
lNUE:X IF'F"t)
,
-
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. :.~ GSiJ:" T;1 I - S~.iG r tl~ ~!.~S CGi1F' FE:F.F
._3 - GE~ SET ENG:~~ F'~~FG~~MANCE
.. ""~r.
~' '... -..'
Dl T ~ ':~.J
.. "~;~s-a:
S'jA~",'Ci-;"'(
.
. -
.:="J
O.....t::~.
58L.:ND
':...::<
CE~n
L~Al.)
t:~qAJ
~', I
, ~
~ ~ 1!leJ 88 8::. e6 21 88 00 8~
::~J 9:' 87 8;. o. 61 97 79 a'~
~J
~.,. 69 87 8~ S~ 80 oi 79 7=J
-:;...1
:6:) 83 86 82 64 80 Sb 78 79
::';:J 76 8= 81 24 79 86 7B 78
'.:..;'!J 1 III 8~ Bl ~- 79 e~ 77 78
. -", 64 ~= 8~ 8'" 7B l:3S 7"l 77
-..'- t:.' '.'
::= : '67 84 8'2: ~~ 77 e4 '16 76
:1 8" "';'_"=t.__.. 8l n 8" 7~ 76
. -- .' . ..'
., .14 53 7B 61 76 (:~ 7" .,.. c:
-., ..... .....'.. .' .. .
-~ :.2 ~ ~ 78 2-0 " . ~,_., ?4 "74-
, ....,J - '.-
. ::J ::.2 31 77 :'<:.J 7~, -:=1 7:- 74
-.-" - :'> SG " . -.- 74 80 ..., ....
.':..J . . - ' '. ' - . o'
00 19 -, .. 7~ 77 7'" 79 71 ',.,
, ~ .' ,..;
- . 1"' 78 7~ 76 72 78 71;) 71
" .' ,
.. 77 71 7~ !~ 77 69 6"1
-.: r::~.s 'E:!~~TEF.> in CCI'JT1NlJ~
NEXT TR,~.rl: IN:=C COLiE \ 1Zl-'t )
~~~PIPF1) ~CF2(PF~) EXITIPF4) RETURNIPF:)
ur'J IT Typ'E ( E
1 !'.DEX (FF''I)
,
"'tP "'~~.J:<<:>~~ - ~w-'---
-
I
-
DATE:
''If'I::: :
III 7 1:::.11 '1
l~,: 56 ~ ~,.
~ l l l l :!'
08CF OBC:
4~La(DH2 60\l1~~
[j[l DE:
74 e
14 6
/4 /;,
1.2- 6,
72 6
n \ (;,
7.1. \6
71 \6
I'l; \6
69 'c
"
69 e
68 t
67 t
06 e
6~' t
-
c.:. :
I
~I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX C
01 OlS ,vJ.OI.
,..p~ ~
c--- -e c::o' ~ -
01
n"" li:1 d
,~
'" -
- , ,
-.
00 Ol no a~..", Itd OOl
16/E/6 "IA OUoMHS I !Alp O~.I ":~h~1
U'f'O "'0" ...... IJQIIO $.lawolsnJ
I
I
a"/UDq.I.~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9ZSZ0
I
- .....
I
...
z
"' ~
:IE
"' ,
... :!!
< J :
... ,
III = ,
.
~ on .
. M ,
i ~ '"
: ... !
.; ... . ,
;c ~,
.'
.f ... .'
.
21 .. !!:
'w 0 z,
.z .. . .
~. z'
~ ~~ > c,
~ ~.
. :;;
OW z: cl
~"'l ."
JI ." .,
~ " a ~
. 0 . w,
. .. ~ ti;
c ..
~ c 0 C'
W'
" 0 '" .,
... j; .. u o.
... . .. f!
0 .. ~ c.
0 0 u O'
. ~:
" i
. ,
u .. ,
.- ~
.. _0
c-- .' ,
. ii i~ .
.. "" ..W l
uoOi ~co !
z w~~
o ~. l).e .
.. .- ~.. .
. w.
<: o~
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
",
9'....
9tlSL
AN 'an.oq:)~n=>>
01 dlHS
ooe XOR 0 d
'd~oo IU11~^~a~ p.o~ u.la~o
01 0105
lOLL -lEL -9H
LlLlt All 'lMlOO 'lIAna XV11l1Vi 19
"dlIO:l 'no USYf\ aNnSI 9N0"1 101. rxllYXVd
i~IO~1
- _______................J.-
~ I
I '~
.&
.
. 0
. .
. .
. .
. .
~ 0
.
.
.
. ~
. . I, / "
. "
. .
. . ~ ;; ... ~
. ~
. ..
. r.:
I- "
. r'i I~ ~ fi'
. ,
~~
! L\ .
I-
: ~
I r-.-
.
. c
i
~ :
.
.
f- ~
.
. ~
.
.
~
.
~
,
,
.
.
.
.
.
i
,
.
~
.
.
'.
~~
.0
>-.
Co
Ot
z.
::OJ!
5.
.
~;
-"
..
:n
..
"0
.
Q
~
.
o
.
i
.~~..-...
'.
.
.
I
.
;1
.
(I
<.
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
<I.
I
1
APPENDfX D
11/7190
1 SOUTHOLO TOWN COlLECTION CENTER
OECEII8ER 1990
SCALEHDUSE MONTHLY REPORT
1 CUIUI.tiy. 1990 Honthly H.t.ri.1 SUII.ry (in TONS) Through DECEH8ER 31
JAN FE8 HAR APR HAY JUN JUL AU6 SEP OCT NOY OEC TOTAl.
1 Ita
1 Chargubh
8rush 134.65 167.31 298.47 691.94 266.75 379.95 526.31 355.04 206.81 266.88 336.92 216.00 3847.03
no 411.43 311.34 606.41 491.65 565.99 474.47 896.40 468. II 597.13 656. 17 589.71 660.65 6855.52
1 toncnh 36.22 73.00 104.25 120.66 42.44 87.32 280.41 101.54 67.85 65.50 18.67 51.14 1049.00
L.ndc har i ng 150.58 626.17 1037.32 140.53 161.36 174.91 212.74 110.39 107.88 116.38 104.44 41.12 2983.82
Rubbisll (Ii xed) 204.00 166.44 433.78 337.61 257.52 257.35 454.13 331.95 264.04 317.59 276. II 314.96 3615.48
1 Scrap "-tal 57.31 51.71 57.31 52.16 42.19 49.89 53.14 70.68 56.29 109.18 41.37 49.62 690.'1
Tins 16.54 14.95 16.54 24.05 23.27 20.00 14.27 15.56 10.00 8.68 22.00 25.00 210.86
1 TOTAL: 1076.73 1470.982554.08 1858.60 1359.52 1443.89 2437.40 1453.27 1310.00 1540.38 1389.28 1358.49 19252.62
Non-chargeabll
1 Agricultural 38.37 11.13 5.66 10.72 5.56 0.52 2.36 65.73 85.79 72.93 71.32 60.02 436. II
6arbage 1234.37 962.64 1145.13 1264.33 1330.61 1603.99 2734.58 1716.54 1529.01 1297.51 1065.64 1065.42 17009.71
Leayes/6rass
1 /Hulch 48.00 43.32 182.78 397.47 407.14 357.40 394.04 254.99 187.71 239.74 312.64 418.'8 3244.27
Sand/Sod 56.29 791.26 34'.38 163.84 583.30 569.16 511.09 920.60 229.00 103'.5' 361.02 747.62 6322.15
Sh.1I Ii sll 0.62 3.32 10.89 15.24 5.00 5.35 11.25 10.&0 0.54 62.81
Sludgl 20.66 17.17 18.04 37.03 8.44 58.00 142.01 66.65 41.23 33.04 69.34 9.65 521.26
1 Wood Chips 4.27 10.36 4.85 10.10 10.98 20.25 10.47 1'.28 7.72 6.94 105.22
Houslhold
Recyclables 37.34 34.71 53.50 60.7' 68.71 70.56 106.99 119.59 118.54 108.37 92.33 116.81 '88.30
1 TOTAL: 1435.03 1864.50 1765.47 1'39.032407.14 2680.62 3'17.29 322'.35 2207.16 2821.71 1996.61 2425.98 28689.89
1 6RANO TOTAL: 2511.76 3335.48 431'.55 37'7.63 3766.66 4124.51 6354.69 4682.62 3517.16 4362.0' 3385.89 3784.47 47942.51
1 Wuh Oil
(gallons) 1380 850 1125 1135 1390 555 1655 1145 1150 1265 1333 1278 14261
1 Toxics
II 01 55
I gal druIs) 17 16 II 9 12 65
NOTE: Mon-ch.rglabl. 'recyclablls' arl gl.ss, pl.stic contain.rs, tin and alulinUl cans,
I neyspaplf, corrugated, battlrils, and ollice pap.r. Along charglabll itas, scrip
Iltal and tirls ir. .150 recyclld.
1 -1-
\
I
-"
I SOUTHOLD TOWN COLLECTION CENTER
JUNE 1991
I SCALEHOUSE NONTHlY REPORT
CUlulitiYe 1991 Nonthly Niteriil SUlliry lin TONS) Through JUNE 30
1 -----------------------------------
JUNE
-------------- YTO 1 CHAN6E
1 Totd I Chinge I Chinge Frol TOTAL FRllIl YTD
JAN FEB NAR APRIL NAY Tons Frol Niy June 1990 TONS LAST YEAR
--- ---- ----- ------ ---
I. Itel Chuguble
1 Br ush 226.57 160.72 449.92 645.79 IB9.34 251.5B 32.91 -33.Bl . 1923.92 -O.B%
.n 0 181.70 214.57 385.11 471.95 460.14 402.46 -12.51 -15.21 : 2115.93 -29.21
Concrete 7.21 11.52 18.67 39.11 44.95 13.77 -69.41 -B4.21 : 135.23 -70.81
1 Lindc1 ur i n9 47.61 48.05 43.73 55.91 139.13 49.69 -64.3% -71.6% : 384.12 -B3.21
Rubbish (Iixed) 140.14 161.20 226.65 310.43 29B.93 315.95 5.71 22.81 : 1453.30 -12.31
Scup Nehl B2'52 27.66 36.48 53.81 40.00 49.68 24.2% -0.4% 390.15 -6.61
Tires 32.25 26.77 17.00 20.00 19.98 22.00 10.1% 10.0% 13B.00 19.6%
1
TOTAL: 71B.00 650.49 1177.56 1597.00 1192.47 1105.13 -7.31 -23.51 6440.65 -34.01
1 Non-chugubh
Agri cui tur i1 120.57 7.61 6.B5 17.92 5.46 1.00 -BI.71 92.3% , 159.41 121.51
I 6ubige 992.56 808.29 1009.17 1155.26 1097.17 1341.72 22.3% -16.4% 6404.17 -15.11
Grus I I I I 251.24 136.97 -45.51 I 3BB.21 I
LentS/Griss
/Nu1ch 90.0B 61.73 196.70 467.05 I BUS 94.04 -48.9% -B3.5% 1093.65 -23.B%
1 Sind/Sod 1.72 656.57 744.74 52B.20 1111.99 477.11 -57.1% -16.21 3520.33 40.11
Shell fish 2.32 5.11 120.3% -53.1% 7.43 -49.9%
Sludge 175.15 303.93 12.B7 1.3B 39.35 47.99 22.01 -17.3% 580.67 264.4%
1 Wood Chi ps 1.32 0.19 7.10 7.17 3.47 3.5B 3.21 -64.6% 22.B3 -22.Bl
Household
Recyc labl es 112.30 92.99 124.61 145.81 134.70 158.84 17.9% 125.1% 769.25 136.21
1 TOTAL: 1493.70 1931.31 2102.04 2322.79 2B29.75 2266.36 -19.9% -15.5% 12945.95 7.1%
1 GRAHO TOTAL: 2211.70 25BI.BO 3279.60 3919.79 4022.22 3371.49 -16.21 -18.31 193B6.60 -11.3%
1 Wuh Oil
(gillons) 854 530 2317 1825 1585 1305 -17.71 135.1% 8416 30.8%
1 Toxics
II of 55
9il drulS) 30 9 14 10 12 19 58.3% 111.1% 94 80.8%
1 : - ------
NOTE: Non-chirgeible 'recycllbles' ire gliss, pliStic contiiners, tin lAd ilulinul cins,
l' neYSpiper, corrugihd, bitteries, lAd offiCI piper. Along chirglib1e itels, scrip
leti1 ind tires irl i1so recycled.
1 . 6uss not counhd sepiuttly until Niy 1991.
-.
I
I
I
Time 1&:57:31
fRIAL A .. of Load:
4&
BR 138
Ir~3ll CO~ 3
rc. G 120
34
IJcltar~' ~ 1 i
Nlp (fit M
,: ~~ I'~ O~R ~
14'3
RM 1
SA 3
I
,eport Total_
I
I
I
I
MATERIAL
I B~
'I) C
Ir~ k CO~
..jafl I
t-hw
MATERIAL Summary Date 01-11-'30
Nt Weight Tot Charge /
e //
b ~ ./ 0.00
1 &400 1 ,/v 134. &0
77180 lb~
1'38&&0 lb ,/ 1'3&1.20
48&0 1 b ;;' 48. &0
522600 I b r' V o. 000
I b ../"} O. 0
1&&70 ~ 437.00
76460 lb v ./
b~~ 0.00
36400 ib fI" /' 0.00
21740 lb -"/ ~ 0.00
5&460 /~ 877.&0
'37600 I b ,,"',/ 0 00
120 lb/~" / .
lb ~ 0.00
70520
page 1
.. of Load_
513
Net Weight
11 '35&70 I b
Tot Charge
345'3.00
End
of
Report
_._ _ _ - _ J'
-- - - -- -- - .- - -- - -- -- -
- - .
-' .
F
, ~.-'.
- - -- -17
'rI~4..
...,. "
- .
Time 16:53: 1'3
.. of Loads
3
35
130
3
127
fl1ft~ ~:
:~I'''-JJ R
I SA
eport Totals
7
1
227
1
If;/ rO
-ffi,(V
Date 01-18-90
Net Weight Tot Charge
26660 lb~ 0.00
76480 IbVV 158.40
185420 lb .rw. 1850.20
10820 lb ~ 108.20
606600 lb~ 0.00
O.
lb~ 25.60
lb~ -0.00
~={./ l11g:~g
page 1
MATERIAL Summary
37280
16280
118420
18140
.. of Loads
5BB
I
I
I
End
of
Report
I!III.r-
Net Weight
112Bl '30 I b
Tot Charge
32~3.20
-....--.. --
I
I
,tRIAL
A
~ B~
.,,~k_CON
,',br~IL~
:i.Mt!4-JOM
-~di'l1) O~
- SA
SL
jfltl,K 1q
J / A"-iJ/
MATERIAL Summary I page 1
Date 01-25-90
Tot Charge
Time 1&:59:0&
.. of L,:>ads
Net Weight
10940 1b.lt:
28&00 1 b v//
2005&0 1bn-
55 SO Ib ~
4923S0 11 b ~~
18450 1 b .l't
27420 Ib'/~
15700 Ib ~
28S&0 1 b ;~
43440 Ib V
22&00 1 b ./"" I
7720 lb
I
leport Totals
I
I
I
I
-r-~-----------
I
2
24
135
3
11S
37
&
1
1
94
2
1
.. of Loads
424
Net Weight
902250 lb
End
of
Report
0.00
127.20
1995.00
55. SO
0.00
0.00
274.20
0.00
0.00
417.00
0.00
0.00
Tot Charge
2872.20
-------- --- - -- ---------
~ _ ~ - 'fo
"thrl/ page 1
Date 02-01-90
Net Weight ~ Tot Charge
22740 1 b :;t: 0.00
24000 Ib ~ 240.00
294&20 lbj./~ 2929.00
&1060 lb ;1./ 610.60
528800 1 b /-/ o. 00
24080 lb V// 0.00
214100 lb~~ 2141.00
('47S0 lb / / 0.00
!86060 lb0// 0.00
83320 lb~~ 811.80
1320 lb /. / 0.00
14200 lb vV 0.00
MATERIAL Summary
tATERIAL
Time 17:03:47
.. cof Lc,ads
A
I' SR
o C
-" nc re j-e-- CON
I" J d~lfl ~J ~~
M
)r I'>> w.;t) OM
('lAt~lI'1J R
SA
SL
I-
I
2
37
16S
6
118
46
21
1
4
14&
1
-:>
~
Report Totals
.. of Loads
552
Net Weight
13590S0 lb
End
of
Rep",rt
Tot Charge
&732.40
~....~...;;.,-
-
.~ ~.
i
,
"
"
.-
i....
I..~~~~l:>>U--=- ~~...-";":' -~.~,;n~.i1. _.........._d"-~:~"h..:.z:.~.:;:.J.
:.:.~.;::;~~...,.:.'.~. /.,.... ...... .' ;.;' .t: .:....: :.\
- -~....:.~~.~ :.~~;. ',.:.~ :.....~: -~~, - ";f,. -!- - ~ :'';'~
.' ...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MATERIRL
Tien. Oat.
. e.f Lo.ds
A
SR
C
CARD
CCL
Co", r, ~e. CON
FA
FP
FT
G
GL
GR
~ I eo,.,''14, L~
"U 1t..,''lO .f:c fTJ(' rf}l foott( OM
';r ..J owc
,
C'j D
R
REC
S
SA
SL
TIN
we
Report Totals
I
I
1~9
158
I
6
3
27
~8
2
1~6
2
106
1~9
18
I
3~
203
18
~
33
2
I
10
. of' Load.
1123
End of' Report
~
MATERIAL
Ti_ Oat.
. of' Loads
A
BAT
SR
C4.D C
CARD
Ca.
e", VI ere. ~-4!- CON
FA
FP
FT
G
GL
GR
I...cw\r!c/eAr'!'t.4 L~
CU~D/~ Sdtp P1t'h~:,
P
R
REC
S
SA
- SL
TIN
we
Report Tot.l.
I
3
I
188
191
I
15
10
~I
87
3
169
2
132
205
13
I
21
I
301
9
2
65
I
I
I
. of' L.oads
1465
End of Repo1""t
..-:..:-..
MATERIAL SUMM.ry
15J!Z126
Net Welght
or -IR-r I
"'''''K
07/2~/~i
lot Ch.rg~
20 Ib
380 Ib?/'
97~00 Ib
llB360 Ib
4!-420 Ib
2220 Ib ~
3000 Ib v
o Ib
o Ib
o Ib /
5B92~0 Ib
3~380 Ib /
3~360 Ib . /
24740 Ib ~
89700 Ib v
17600 Ib /
7560 Ib V.
1519BO Ib :/
45900 Ib /
lB60 lb '/
1270770 lb/./
17660 Ib
52~0 Ib
3~7BO Ib ./
Net Weight
2551570 Ib
o. (to
0.. (1(1
11 79. 60
2367.20
0.00
0.00
60.00
165.00
96.00
100. (10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1567.60
0.00
0.00
1894.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tot Charge
7~29.BO
MATERIAL Summary
161011:55
Net Weight
+-~--'1J
T~rU
07/31/91
Tot Charge
o Ib
6980 Ib ,/
o Ib /
110180 Ib '/
191140 Ib
6060 Ib
5860 Ib //
22520 Ib
o Ib
o lb
o Ib /
700100 Ib
53700 Ib
33060 Ib -:::-
32500 Ib /
66320 Ib
19000 Ib /
3600 Ib
66220 Ib
13~040 Ib'/
28800 Ib /
680 Ib . /'
1973900 Ib ./
6820 Ib./
5380 Ib /
7740 Ib v
Net Weight
3474600 Ib
0.00
0.00
0.00
1250.40
3818.80
0.00
0.00
450.40
265.00
174.00
75.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1326.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
2526.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tot Ch.rge
9886.00
page 1
page 1