Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPB-10/17/2005 KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MAIUNG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES Monday, October 17, 2005 6:00 p.m. RECEIV;:;O ,..p...t Icl;o5PV Present were: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson William J. Cremers, Vice Chairman Kenneth L. Edwards, Member George D. Solomon, Member Anthony Trezza, Senior Planner Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Carol Kalin, Secretary 'j cr 1 5 . ~C7~ Soutl.vid 1<..:11 Clerk SETTING OF THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING Chairperson Woodhouse: Good evening and welcome to the October 17th meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board. For our first order of business, I will entertain a motion to set Monday, November 7,2005 at 6:00 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, as the time and place for the next regular Planning Board Meeting. Bill Cremers: So moved. Ken Edwards: Seconded. Chairperson Woodhouse:. All in favor? Aves: Ms. Woodhouse, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Solomon. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? And that motion carries. Chairperson Woodhouse: We have a number of public hearings tonight. The public will have an opportunity to address the Board. We ask that when you want to address the Board you come to either of these podiums where there is a microphone, a piece of paper and a pen. If you would put your name on the list clearly that way when we transcribe the report, we will know exactly who to ascribe the comments to. **************************** Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Two October 17, 2005 PUBLIC HEARINGS Greaersen's Keep LLC: Proposal is to subdivide an 81,913 s.f, parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 40,913 s.t. and Lot 2 equals 41,000 s.f. The property is located at the terminus of Gull Pond Lane in Greenport. SCTM#'s 1000-35-3-12.6 & 12.7 Chairperson Woodhouse: Is there anyone who would like to address the Board on this application? Pat Moore: Good evening, Board. I have Mr. & Mrs. Claudio here tonight so that if there are any questions tonight that I can't answer, I will have them speak and answer whatever questions you have. I just want to clarify I think in your records, I just want to be sure for the record, that you are reviewing a subdivision map that was forwarded to your Board September 13, 2005. Anthony is going to double check the file because sometimes things get filed in unusual ways. So we'll just leave it at that. I also have two individual surveys and now have the design of the houses that are proposed which will hopefully help Anthony when he is reviewing the subdivision maps so that we don't have an inadvertent inconsistency between our house plan and the subdivision map that you ultimately approve. So, I am going to put that in your file for the record and one copy for Anthony for your review when you have a chance. Aside from that we will be here to answer any questions. I think the application speaks for itself. We did get Zoning Board approval for the creation of the lots and the proposed configuration and we have in process the Health Department getting approval, DEC, and the Trustees, I think you are aware again through my correspondence of September 13 which submitted the maps. For the Trustees, I submitted individual applications for the house plans, but their position is that until the subdivision is approved, they don't feel they can act on the individual house, which is fine. We are waiting for this Board to act on the subdivision and then the applications are actually ready to be filed whether or not they'll act on them; they're going to wait until this Board acts. So, as soon as you do, we'll get the green light from the Trustees. But they are well aware of the application process submitted to them, again, being reviewed and consistent with all the environmental regulations we have to comply with. I'll sit down and wait for any comments. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Is there anyone else who would like to address the Board on this application? Paul Ahlers: I live at 1905 Gull Pond. I join the Lot 1 on the subdivision. I have many concerns: by subdividing this property, if you look at the proposed surveys for the two houses, they are proposing to bring in almost 2,000 yards of fill on the front of these houses, raising the grade approximately five feet above the existing grade in the road. And I'm adjoining property. My question is: how are they going to contain this water from running into the road, running into the pond? From what I understand, the DEC will not allow this property to be bulkheaded. So that means that the elevation down on the water side of this property has to basically remain what it is. Also, with the subdivision, they are already asking, which is showing the Trustees for relief on bringing South old Town Planninq Board Paqe Three October 17. 2005 their deck into the 100', approximately Y-, almost 80' into that. And, with this water, if this water is not contained on the property, it goes in either to my yard or into the street. Who is responsible? I'm assuming it's the Town of Southold, and that means the Town of Southold has to spend a lot of money putting a lot of unnecessary drainage into a road. So I just want this Board to really look at the proposed survey, especially with that fill situation. Because the groundwater is at 3'4, so the reason that's why the fill is brought in is so they can put in the septic system. Since, by dividing these lots they have narrowed the frontage so much that the property is like a wedge, that they can't put in shallower pools, like 2' rings. If you had one hole there, you'd have 2' rings, you wouldn't require all this fill. I can't see how they could put in all those rings and enough drainage to contain this water. Chairperson Woodhouse: We will look at the drainage calculations as part of our Anthony Trezza: Certainly our Town Engineer will look at this as we are reviewing it. Certainly we are going to require, and the Health Department hasn't issued their permit as yet so, certainly we always require that all runoff be contained on site, and Trustees also are going to require it; there are a number of agencies reviewing this, so we are certainly going to make sure in the design; the Public Hearing is actually, as recommended tonight, being left open. So I could make sure that I have the right map and do our due diligence as we are looking at. Paul Ahlers: Also, on the survey on the northerly side of the property, there is a 20' right of way that's not shown. Anthony Trezza: OK. Disregarding the access to the dock also? Paul Ahlers: Yes. Anthonv Trezza: That was actually brought to my attention from the Trustees; I'll get something on the record. There are two docks on this property, one is permitted for the property owner from what I understand, and then one that you have I believe right of access to. Paul Ahlers: No. I have my own. Anthony Trezza: Oh, you have your own. But there is one that Paul Ahlers: Yes, that's the right of way that adjoins my property. Anthony Trezza: OK. That's not shown on the survey. Paul Ahlers: Thank you. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Is there anyone else who would like to address the Board on this application? Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Four October 17. 2005 Richard Witt: I own the property directly bordering the four acres. I know I came up against the Board of Appeals and I expressed my concerns to them. I would just like to bring it to you as the Planning Department of the Town. Quick history: my wife and I just moved here; we were born and raised on the South Fork and saw the place developed beyond its means. One of the major problems was there was no planning involved. It happened very quickly; it happened over the last 50 years I was there, but in the last 20 it took a big push forward. On the North Fork, it's going to happen in the next five, until we run out of land. When we came over here and looked for a piece of property, because I used to work here when I first started working on the Island, we found Gull Pond, and it looked like a very well planned out neighborhood. All the houses had docks, they all had right of ways, they all had room between the houses. We bought the four acres. And on the four acres was a covenant saying that we would not be able to divide the four acres of property, which made sense. Which said, well, I'm sure a previous Planning Board before you, when they developed this whole area, they said: "Look, that's the extent of this Gull Pond; we'll even put a covenant on the four acres so they cannot divide this and bring any more traffic down Gull Pond Lane and congest the area." Just in the back of my head I keep thinking, "Why did they put a covenant on my four acres and didn't put a covenant on the two acres?" Probably because they didn't think that anytime in the future somebody would actually subdivide that piece of property. It's kind of an implied covenant on the piece of property, so to speak. Of course, with actions and reactions, we have to think that if you allow this to go through, what could be the result? By doing this, of course, would leave me, or whoever I would sell the property to, to subdivide those four acres. Because, if you can cut apart this two-acre parcel, why have a covenant on a four-acre parcel that's right next to it? Now you can go from one street to the other street. I go all the way down to Fiddler Lane. I have a separate access. When they initially designed this, they put a covenant on my property and said, "Look, this is all the development we want on Gull Pond." The other thing I want you to consider is in Gull Pond, many of it is bulkheads; most of it is bulkheads. This piece of property is actually beach. So I will speak for some of the people who can't speak tonight: the swans, the geese, the turtles, and all the wildlife that use that beach. It's the only way out of the pond, except for a few other places around the town. This is something I want you to look at in this pond. Also, by subdividing, and it came to me actually on one of the rainy days when I can't do much on rainy days, there's a Trustee sign for the public meeting back on the second piece of property for the Trustees. So I had to walk on to see what the sign was, because there was a notice for a public hearing which wasn't posted on the road, it's 300' in the property behind the fence behind the gate, so you can't really see the public notice sign. Anyway, I went down to the Trustees and I said: "Look, let me have a copy of the prints of what they have planned for the property. And they seemed a bit confused, because it looks like this dock on each part of this subdivision you're going through, that is my dock; that is my right of way. And that was not written down on the survey. Now I'm wondering if the Zoning Board of Appeals is confused on that either. Because right now I know when you look at the survey, I have a copy here, I'm sure you all do, where you have a divided line there's a dock on one side, there's a dock on the other side, no problem. Everybody has a dock. Well, they forgot to write "right of way." They also, adjoining the property, which is my 1900, it says "dwelling, public water." There is no Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Five October 17, 2005 dwelling, It's vacant. So there are two mistakes I found on the survey that went to the Zoning Board of Appeals. I don't know how much aware they were that that dock was not part of that property. The other thing you're going to have to do after you subdivide this piece of property, you're going to have to realize that you're going to create something here which does not exist anywhere on Gull Pond, which is a piece of property that has no access to the water. There's no dock; you can't walk across the wetlands. There's a beach you can't put your boat upon. There's no access; every other house has a dock, a floating dock, some way to keep a boat. So I'm afraid of course, that in future years, because it's the Planning Board that has to plan for future years, five, ten years down the line, when somebody buys this piece of property, and of course it'll be a million and a half, two million dollars, whatever property is going to sell for, they're going to buy this piece of property and they're not going to have a dock. Yet they're going to ask for a dock and they're going to want to put a dock back there. (inaudible) So these are the two issues you will actually have to concern yourselves with: one of them because I have a covenant and why was that covenant made in the first place on those four acres, and if you do this, you're creating a piece of property that does not have a dock, and it's the only place on all of Gull Pond that has a house without a dock. Whoever gets into that piece of property, I'll guarantee you is going to want a dock at some point in time. That'll be up against the Board five or six years from now and of course it'll be up to the Planning. That's about the extent of it. I just hope you seriously consider; also, the two errors on the survey, I found two. I didn't notice them the first time until I went to the Trustees, and the Trustees looked at it and said: "We didn't quite understand where the dock was." So I straightened them out and I wonder if that brought confusion to the Board of Appeals. I know what happens if I go to the Building Department and I bring surveys, they kinda take me back and they say: "get a corrected survey." So those are two errors, we don't know how many more errors are on the survey; go back to the beginning and start with a real survey. The other thing is you have to remember: on the piece closest to Gull Pond, I think that Pat just brought you through the Building proposals that were presented to the Trustees; it's a five-bedroom house, and I don't see where those cars are going on that driveway. The only place I can think of them parking is on my property. I just can't see fitting all those cars for all those people on that one little driveway sitting by that five-bedroom house. Thank you for your time. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Is there anyone else who would like to address the Board? Tom Kraus: I live on the lot that's adjacent on the south to what would be Lot #2. This proposal, just as a matter of logic, suggests that the applicant's house will be built closer to my end of the property and my house than if we were on the two-acre lot. I've seen plans and I'm very comfortable with the grading plans and the plans to maintain water because I have just as much a risk of water runoff as the party to the north. I am confident that the owners will take care of that, and I have no problem with this project. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Six October 17. 2005 Patricia Moore: I'm the attorney for the applicant. I just want to address some of the points that were raised to clarify some of the points. The first issue is drainage: Anthony very correctly pointed out that all throughout the process every administrative agency tells us we have to maintain water on-site. And I would say that the houses, or these properties and the development of these properties, is much more regulated than any of the homes of the people that spoke out because of the fact that we are next to the water. DEC reviews it, makes sure that we have proper drainage, that we have roof runoff in drywells. That's a standard condition that is automatic every time that a house designed on the water is considered. The Trustees is also one of their standard conditions. Moreover, we have a non-fertilization buffer. If you recall, this property, by the prior owner, has lawns from end to end, is completely cleared, a completely disturbed site. The proposal before you will actually mitigate some of the damage that was caused by a prior owner requiring the non-fertilization buffer to keep water runoff and pollutants from going beyond the property and into the water. So, actually, the development of this site will be much more environmentally sensitive than the property in its existing condition. Secondly, the right of way: the Zoning Board has a copy of the deed. There is a right of way for the northerly parcel. It is a pedestrian right of way; I mean foot traffic only, not cars. A pedestrian right of way with an electric line, utility line for the dock that was constructed there by Quintin, I believe it was, by the prior, with the consent of the owners, the underlying - Brader authorized Quintin with a right of way to build a dock on their property. That right of way, any right of way, does not get extinguished except by written document. There is no written document extinguishing the right of way. That is there, there is no doubt to the Claudio family, Gregersen's Keep, that this right of way exists and, until such time as the person who has the benefit of that right of way extinguishes it by their own actions, it continues to be there. So, there's no doubt that that is there, and I sense that it's a pedestrian right of way. The Zoning Board usually is not concerned about pedestrian right of ways. It doesn't impact the property except for foot traffic. So, that is there; the survey could certainly have a notation put on the subdivision map that there is a pedestrian right of way, but someday down the line if ever it is extinguished, you've got a map that shows it and it creates kind of a little confusion. So, it's already on record and it's a deed of right. So, if you want it to be added, but it's not necessary, it's on record, and the title to this property shows it. Third thing is the sanitary. It has been designed very carefully, Joe Fischetti, I believe, is our sanitary engineer, and we are very careful to design it in conformity with Health Department regulations. The fill that's required is limited to that which is necessary for the sanitary standard fill. We are not aware of the need to bring in enormous amounts of fill. When we do the excavation for the house, there is usually adequate material that gets regarded. What you see there is a grading plan, which was important for the purposes of making sure that Mr. Kraus, who spoke in favor of this application, has a proper grading plan so we cannot create a problem for them. That was part of our agreement with them early on and we have abided by that agreement. It's also a good neighborly thing to do and it's proper planning. So, the individual plan that I gave Anthony tonight shows the grading of the property and that was done with the guidance of Joe Fischetti and is meeting engineering standards. That's not something usually needed on your subdivision map, but you already have it in your file for the individual lot survey. There's no basement. Flood zone standards don't allow Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Seven October 17, 2005 full basements; we have the proper crawl space that's necessary or permissible in flood zones. Again, unlike some of the other houses in the area that may have basements, we are again regulated by extra regulations adopted which require flood zone standards compliance. So again, we are further regulated. I think this Board, in creating the line between the two properties where we have the Zoning Board variance allowing for the creating of the lot at the start we did a great deal of history and planning, we had a planning expert submit to the Zoning Board the whole design and the planning of this subdivision and, in fact, this particular property did not have a covenant prohibiting further subdivision, unlike some of the other lots, because it was assumed that further down we could subdivide this piece. It was appropriate for subdividing and, when we looked at the zoning in place at the time, the open space, the dedication of the land to the north to, I believe, The Nature Conservancy at the time, that there was actually our zoning met current standards. So, that was an issue that was resolved with the Zoning Board and that's what made the Zoning Board comfortable, granting the variances for these lots while certainly we acknowledge that they are one acre, we all know that when the map was adopted, sometimes the lines were not quite identified properly, so that gave us the opportunity to go before the Zoning Board and show that the character of the area and the neighborhood was one acre lots, and we persuaded the Zoning Board. That is not an issue before this Board, we have approved zoning here. Do you have any other questions? I think I've addressed all of them. Chairperson Woodhouse: I just want to remind you that we are going to be holding this hearing open so there will be additional opportunities for comments. Patricia Moore: Right. And if you need something added to the map, I know you'll ask me. Anthonv Trezza: I sure will. Janice Claudio: I just want to say one thing: Lot 1 could have a basement, Lot 2 doesn't have a basement. Lot 2, which is the one adjacent to Tom Kraus, is the one that we will be building on, and the home will be absolutely beautiful. It'll be a credit to the neighborhood. We have employed an architect that's well-known; the home is smashing, and I think that, you know, this is our dream come true, and we will put all of our effort into building a fabulous house that will enhance the neighborhood and make everybody happy. I just wanted to tell you that. It's a little on the emotional side, but it's the real side and when we get through all the paperwork, that's the bottom line; we're just trying to build a really pretty house. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Bill Claudio: I'm the lesser half. Just a couple of comments I'd like to make. One of the things that really gets to me, and it gets to me in many ways, is that my family has been here since 1854. We've been here for a very long time. We've been a member of this community for a very long time. We are not outsiders coming in, we are not developers coming in to do damage to the environment, certainly not. And we seem to be targeted as somebody: "my gosh, look what you're doing to the environment, how Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Eiqht October 17. 2005 terrible you are." As the owner of the properties we now have in Greenport, the restaurant, and all of those things, people come here. We know one of the reasons that people come to Southold Town is because of the environment that Southold Town is. If we didn't have all the pumpkins, if we didn't have all the wineries, if we didn't have all the waterfront, if we didn't have all the things that we have now, that the Planning Board and everybody else is doing their damnedest to protect within the law, these people wouldn't be coming. They're abandoning the south shore, as witnessed. They're abandoning the south shore because it is becoming overcrowded. I just don't want to have people coming from the south shore over here and start demanding some long term residence things that it disturbed me a little bit to make that comment. A couple of other things: the size of the lot, the two lots that will developed out of the one lot; those two properties will be larger than any of the properties along Gull Pond to the north, to the east, and not quite to the south, but it's larger than all other properties on Gull Pond. There may be one or two larger, but not many. And then to the south of us, beginning with Tom Kraus, all of those properties are in the one acre size. So, about 85% of the lots surrounding within Gull Pond are our size or smaller. So we are certainly not changing the nature of the neighborhood. We've been proven in the past to be very good neighbors to all the people we are around. I don't seem to be succeeding very well here, but I would simply say that after the smoke clears, our attitude to being neighbors will not change. We still will be very good neighbors. Thank you. Pat Ahlers: I live at 1905 Gull Pond. I just have some concerns. When we moved here, we moved out to get away from crowds. We were told that it was 2-acre zoning. Not long after we were here, (inaudible). Now the Claudios have applied for not a zoning change, but a variance, and I don't understand the difference. As far as Claudio being an old family name, it doesn't matter who is moving next door. I have nothing against the Claudios; I am concerned about the preservation of the town. That's why I moved here. Chairperson Woodhouse: I'm just going to answer one of your questions. In terms of the variance, the underlying zoning stays the same, but there's a variance for a parcel within that zone. If you go for a zoning change, the underlying zoning would change. That's not what happened here, this is a variance, so the underlying zoning in that area remains what it was before the variance was issued. Pat Ahlers: Which is what? Chairperson Woodhouse: Two-acre zoning. Anthonv Trezza: R-80. John Bradv: I am the former owner of that piece of property. I had no intention to speak tonight, until a comment was made by Ms. Moore, that I did irreparable damage, or words to that effect to the property prior to the closings coming in. Had I done damage, I don't think the Claudios would have been too forthcoming with $2 million for that piece Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Nine October 17. 2005 of property. Secondly, I applied no less than three times to the Town, to the DEC, and everything else, for fill, for bulkheading, for revetements, for anything other than replanting something I didn't denude in the first place to contain the erosion to that piece of property. You wouldn't have suffered at all had any of those things been approved at any time. As a matter of fact, Mr. Terry, Anthonv Trezza: Who I am not, I might say, but the name is sitting there, go ahead. John Bradv: I know that. I went to the Town Planning Board one time to find out whether or not that piece of property could be divided, because at the time I was selling it, that was a paramount question for most of the people. To my knowledge, there was nothing that said it couldn't be divided, but there was nothing that said it could. I presented it in that fashion many, many times during the course of the sale. Mr. Terry was the one that said unequivocally it will never be subdivided. There's no way that property is ever going to be subdivided. So I think, in deference to the Claudios and their long standing in the community, they're probably one of the only ones that could have had it, and I think rightfully so. That if they wanted it divided and it was possible to divide, that it should have been divided, although it was not my desire. However, with that, comes the necessary attention to the detail of the property; whether or not it is done in the best possible means for the most people, the swans and the geese and the ducks notwithstanding. That was an argument I presented to the DEC once for not denuding the beach and not replanting the beach. The property has a long history of attempts. Jerry Latham was my construction bulkhead; he built the dock, the floats and everything else on the property. We had many applications, and I think I had two applications with Terry; I had one with, I have no idea, I know I had at least three, possibly four. Everything was turned down. The only thing that was going to be approved was replanting the beach, which had never been unplanted in the first place. Mr. Witt's point is well taken in terms of what will become the necessary thing: the other dock and float. Somebody is definitely going to want that. There is a beautiful area of wetlands between where the house would sit and where the dock would have to be. That's going to be a major consideration. However, the effect that the Zoning Board of Appeal had already done this. Whether or not you approve is the question here, but it's got to be for the right reason. If this were done in the normal fashion and approved in the normal fashion, without argument and without malfeasance and so on, then there's nothing that you can do about it. It has to be considered for the people who have been here for a long time and the people who are enjoying new home ownership at this point. But I resent deeply that I did anything to that property to lessen its worth. I take great exception to that. Patricia Moore: I apologize. I didn't mean to imply that you... Chairperson Woodhouse: OK, let's not, if you would like to address us on the application and if you need to speak to each other afterwards, that would take place outside. Is there anyone else who would like to address the Board on this application? ~ Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Ten October 17. 2005 Richard Witt: About us south-forkers coming over here. I grew up on the south fork. I was there for 51 years. When I was four years old, I think it was my first thing down at the lighthouse, trying to save the bluffs, my first fight. I continued fighting from age 20 until when I was 50 trying to keep the place to remain in some sort of semblance of anything but Nassau County. I lost a lot of battles. It basically turned into a place where I didn't want to live anymore. And 25 years ago, I started working on Main Street here with the late Eddie Foy in Seatronics. And I love Greenport. I said, you know, all our friends went to Arizona and Texas and Florida. This is still the most beautiful place on earth, I am going to come to Greenport and I am going to stay here. And I speak again for the animals and the environment, and this is what I have been doing for the last 30 years. It's nothing personal, it's just business and the way it is. I try to stop it whenever I can. Except on the South Fork, in the beginning, the major people who destroyed that town were not developers from outside the town, but businessmen from inside the town. I could give you the names, but that's not for you. But it wasn't people from the outside who came, it was long-standing family names who got pushed through planning boards......... Chairperson Woodhouse: I just need to say that we need to keep our comments to this application. Richard Witt: Well, I had to rebut this. Chairperson Woodhouse: No, no, I know you're tempted to but you do not need to, it's OK. Just keep your comments to the application. Richard Witt: Alii ask this Planning Board to do is give a clear slate and an even decision for everyone involved, whether it was me, John or Mr. Claudio. Whoever it happens to be, everybody gets judged fairly. That's alii ask. Chairperson Woodhouse: On behalf of the Board, I assure you that's the way we do our work, and we are not influenced by high-priced lawyers..... or low-priced ones! Georqe Solomon: Nor family names. Bill Claudio: I've already mentioned the environment and how important we think it is, since they seem to be pounding on that. The waterfront that exists on both of those lots is not going to change one iota, not one whit is it going to change. The beach will still be there, the spartina grass, as a matter of fact, part of what we are going to do, which John Brader didn't want to do, we're going to plant more spartina grass. We have already met with the Trustees, the Trustees have walked the property, they have looked it over thoroughly and said: "what do you want us to do?" We said, "well, you could put rocks along the resident bulkhead." That was turned down by the DEC, so we're not going to do that. So, nothing absolutely is going to change on that waterfront. The only thing that might change, as has been pointed out, is if somebody wants a dock on the other property, a dock may eventually get built, but it's going to be a small dock in compliance with what everbody else is doing today anyway and the Trustees will pass Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Eleven October 17, 2005 judgment on that. In terms of the environment and the water fowl, and the people and animals that are there, there's a beautiful peacock who leaves little trails of tail feathers all over the place, it's absolutely gorgeous, and we're not going to do anything to him obviously. There is a family of swans that has adopted that beach, a male and female and four cygnets. Two of the cygnets now eat out of my hand. The other two I haven't won over yet. So, are we going to change the environment? Absolutely not. Do we care about the environment as much as these people do? Absolutely we do. We want the environment to stay that way because it's beautiful. Thank you. Chairperson Woodhouse: Is there anyone else who would like to address the Board on this application? Paul Ahlers: I was wondering if the Board could explain to me when this was zoned two acre by the Board at one point and why that would be reversed? Anthonv Trezza: The Planning Board never zoned the property. The Town Board does a town-wide zoning. When they did this two-acre zoning, I couldn't tell you. 1984 or 1986. Paul Ahlers: I just want you to keep that thought, why it was Anthonv Trezza: I can assure you that when Pat met with me to discuss the project, I said that this is not a subdividable piece of property and you would need to go to the Zoning Board to get a variance, and I am sure they went to the Zoning Board to get a variance and I am sure the Planning Board probably said the same thing, you know we don't usually condone creating non-conforming lots, but we do look at the neighborhood and obviously suggest that they look at the neighborhood. But the Zoning Board acts independently and they will ask for our comments, the Planning Board will always remind the Zoning Board that it's two-acre zoning, but then the Zoning Board changed, didn't change the zone, they just gave them a variance to allow two one-acre lots, completely on their own, having nothing to do with the Planning Board, to be quite honest. Chairperson Woodhouse: Would anyone else like to address the Board? Hearing none, I will call for a resolution to hold this application open. Ken Edwards: I would like to entertain the following: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby holds open the preliminary public hearing for the Standard Subdivision of Gregersen's Keep, LLC. Bill Cremers: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Twelve October 17. 2005 Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? And that motion carries. The hearing is held open. Thank you. Tom Kraus: I'd like to ask a question: held open until a specific time or until the Board gets the information? Anthonv Trezza: At least until November th Chairperson Woodhouse: November th will be our next public hearing. And if we have completed the work that we need to do on this application, we will then bring it back for another public hearing or continue it. Those of you who are interested can call the Planning Board Office, you could look in the paper to see when the next public hearing will be, but it's right now scheduled for November tho OK, thank you. *************************************************** 6:05 p.m. - Krupski Familv LLC: This proposal is for a standard subdivision to subdivide a 57.4574-acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 1.4589 acres and Lot 2 equals 55.9985 acres. The property is located on the nlslo Oregon Road and the slslo Sound View Avenue, approximately 1385' elo Saltaire Way in Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-100-2-3 Chairperson Woodhouse: Is there anyone who would like to speak on this application? Vicki Toth: I am here as the agent of the property owner. If there are any comments or questions that need to be answered or addressed, we are available. I have some of the green receipts that I'd like to give to the file. Thank you. Chairperson Woodhouse: This resolution is to grant preliminary plat approval. Is there anyone else who would like to speak? Hearing none, I will entertain a motion to close this hearing. Bill Cremers: So moved. Georqe Solomon: Second. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? And that motion carries. Mr. Cremers? Bill Cremers: I will offer the following: WHEREAS, this proposal is for a standard subdivision of a 57.4574-acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 1.4589 acres and Lot 2 equals 55.9985 acres; and Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Thirteen October 17, 2005 WHEREAS, an application for sketch approval was submitted to the Planning Board on May 6, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Southold Planning Board granted Sketch Approval and issued a Negative Declaration pursuant to SEQRA on August 8, 2005 upon the map dated February 24, 2005; and WHEREAS, an application for preliminary plat approval was submitted to the Planning Board on September 12, 2005; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby grant Preliminary Plat Approval upon the map dated February 24, 2005 and last revised on July 29, 2005, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submission of the final application form and fee in the amount $500. 2. Submission of the final maps (5 mylars, 8 paper prints) containing the Health Department stamp of approval. 3. LWRP Coastal Consistency Review. 4. Submission of the filed Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. Ken Edwards: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? And that motion carries. ******************************* Hearings Held Over From Previous Meetings: Charnews. Daniel & Stephanie: This proposal is to subdivide a 23.4004-acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 3 acres and Lot 2 equals 20.4004 acres. The property is located on the wlslo Youngs Avenue and the elslo Horton Lane, approximately 375' slo CR 48 in Southold. SCTM#1000-63-1-25 Chairperson Woodhouse: I will entertain a motion to continue to hold open the application. Ken Edwards: So moved. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Fourteen October 17. 2005 Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? And that motion carries. Please read the resolution. Georqe Solomon: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby holds open the public hearing for the Charnews Subdivision. Chairperson Woodhouse: and we have just voted on that. ************************************************* Caselnova. Ralph & Catherine: Proposal is to subdivide a 15.68-acre parcel into three lots where Lot 1 equals 2.0034 acres, Lot 2 equals 2.3518 acres and Lot 3 equals 11.3226 acres upon which the development rights have been sold to Suffolk County. The property is located on the nlslo NYS Route 25, approximately 1,740 feet wlo Browns Hill Road in Orient. SCTM#'s 1000-18-3-9.8 & 9.9 Chairperson Woodhouse: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hereby holds open the public hearing for the Caselnova Subdivision. Georqe Solomon: Second. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? And that motion carries. ********************************** CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS, STANDARD SUBDIVISIONS, RE- SUBDIVISIONS (Lot Line Changes) Final Determinations: Reillv/Brittman: Proposal is to merge a vacant, 24,727 sJ. lot (SCTM# 1000-78-2-11) with the improved property to the north and the improved property to the south, where, following the transfer, Parcel 1 (SCTM# 1000-78-2-10) equals 35,503 s.t. and Parcel 2 (SCTM# 1000-78-2-12) equals 37,376 sJ. The property is located on the east side of Main Bayview Road and the south side of Glenn Road in Southold. Ken Edwards: I would like to entertain the following: WHEREAS, this proposal is to merge a vacant 24,727 sq. ft. lot (SCTM#1 000-78-2-11) with the improved property to the north and the improved property to the south where, following the transfer, Parcel 1 (SCTM#1000-78-2-10) equals 35,503 sq. ft. and Parcel 2 (SCTM#1000-78-2-12) equals 37,376 sq. ft.; and Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Fifteen October 17. 2005 WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board granted conditional final approval on May 9, 2005; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted 5 additional copies of the map and the copies of the new recorded deeds on October 4, 2005; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the map prepared by Joseph Ingegno, L.S. dated November 9, 2004, and authorize the Planning Board Chair to endorse the final maps. Georqe Solomon: Second. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. ********************************** Setting of Preliminary Hearings: Morris. Davsman & Nannie: This proposal is to subdivide a 15,423 s.f. parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 9,794 sJ. and Lot 2 equals 5,629 sJ. The property is located on the north side of Brown Street and the south side of Linnet Street, approximately 313 feet west of 7th Street in Greenport. SCTM #'s 48.-3-7.1 & 48.-3-24 Bill Cremers: I will offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, this proposal is to subdivide a 15,423 sJ. parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 9,794 s.f. and Lot 2 equals 5,629 s.f.; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2005, the Zoning Board of Appeals determined that the subject properties were ineligible for a waiver of merger; and WHEREAS, as a result of the aforementioned determination, the subject properties can only be separated through the subdivision of land pursuant to Chapter A 106 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, this subdivision requires lot area and setback relief in order for the Planning Board to approve the application as proposed; and WHEREAS, the Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals granted the necessary relief for the proposed action on July 21, 2005; and WHEREAS, an application for sketch plan approval was submitted to the Southold Town Planning Board on August 12, 2005; be it therefore Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Sixteen October 17. 2005 RESOLVED, that the South old Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.7, do an uncoordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency and, as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration; Ken Edwards: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. Bill Cremers: and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the surveys prepared by John C. Ehlers, L.S. dated September 23, 2005, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submission of the application for preliminary plat approval and fee in the amount of $1 ,000. 2. Submission of Health Department approval for the proposed action; Chairperson Woodhouse: Is there a second? Ken Edwards: Second. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. Please continue. Bill Cremers: and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, November 7,2005, at 6:00 p.m. for a preliminary public hearing on the map prepared by John C. Ehlers, Land Surveyor dated September 23, 2005. Georqe Solomon: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? The motion carries. ********************************************* Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Seventeen October 17, 2005 Sketch Extensions: Glover. Leander: Proposal is to subdivide a 12.57-acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 11.57 acres and Lot 2 equals one acre and is improved with a single-family residence. The property is located on the slslo Cox's Lane approximately 1500' nlwof Main Road in Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-96-3-7.1 Ken Edwards: I would like to entertain the following: WHEREAS, the proposal is to subdivide a 12.57-acre parcel into two lots where Lot 1 equals 11.57 acres and Lot 2 equals 1 acre and is currently improved with a single family residence; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board granted conditional sketch plan approval on February 10, 2003 for the proposed action; and WHEREAS, conditional sketch approval expired on August 10, 2003; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted a letter dated February 7,2005 requesting a retro- active extension of time for the February 10, 2003 conditional sketch approval; and WHEREAS, on February 14, 2005, the Southold Town Planning Board granted an extension of time for conditional sketch plan approval until August 10, 2005; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a letter dated September 30, 2005 requesting another extension of time as the application is still pending Health Department approval at this time; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Planning Board hereby grant an extension of time for sketch approval until February 10, 2006. Bill Cremers: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. ********************************************* Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Eiqhteen October 17. 2005 Conditional Sketch Determinations: Orchard Street Farms: Proposal is for a Cluster Conservation Subdivision to subdivide a 15.51-acre parcel into 3 lots, where lot 1 equals 13.499 acres upon which 12.459 acres is proposed to be preserved through the application of a Conservation Easement, Lot 2 equals 1.006 acres and Lot 3 equals 1.007 acres. The parcel is located on the n/w corner of King Street and Old Farm Road and the s/s of Orchard Street in Orient. SCTM# 1000-25-4-11.8 Bill Cremers: I will offer the following: WHEREAS, proposal is for a Cluster Conservation Subdivision of a 15.51-acre parcel into 3 lots, where lot 1 equals 13.499 acres upon which 12.459 acres is proposed to be preserved through the application of a Conservation Easement, Lot 2 equals 1.006 acres and Lot 3 equals 1.007 acres; and WHEREAS, an application for sketch plan approval was submitted to the Planning Board on April 15, 2005; and WHEREAS, the applicant has proposed an 80% preservation of the buildable lands and a 60% reduction in density; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the South old Town Planning Board hereby classify this application as a Conservation Subdivision; Ken Edwards: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. Bill Cremers: and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board start the SEQRA lead agency coordination process for this unlisted action; Ken Edwards: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Nineteen October 17. 2005 Bill Cremers: and be it further RESOLVED. that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional sketch approval upon the map prepared by John C. Ehlers, Land Surveyor, dated last revised on July 19, 2005, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submission of the final application form and application fee in the amount of $500. 2. Submission of final map containing the Health Department stamp of approval. Upon submission of Health Department approval, the Planning Board will schedule the application for a final public hearing. 3. Submission of the Phase 1 Archaeological Survey. 4. LWRP Coastal Consistency Review. 5. Submission of a draft Conservation Easement that permanently preserves the 12.459 acres from future residential development. 6. Submission of the park and playground fee in the amount of $7000 ($3,500 for each newly created lot). 7. Draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions that contain the following clauses: a. That no herbicides and pesticides shall be applied to Lots 2 and 3 as shown on the approved subdivision map of "Orchard Street Farm." b. Prior to any construction activity on any of the lots shown on the approved subdivision map, the project will require a General Permit for the storm water runoff from construction activity (GP-02-01) administered by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation under Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Program. c. By this Declaration, future residents of the lots shown on the approved subdivision map are advised that the lots may be subject to the noise, dust and odors normally associated with the agricultural activities pursuant to Article XXII, Farmland Bill of Rights, of the Southold Town Code. Ken Edwards: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. **************************************** Old Orchard at Cutchoque: Proposal is to subdivide a 4.619-acre parcel into four lots, where Lot 1 equals 40,000 sJ., Lot 2 equals 40,001 sJ., Lot 3 equals 40,000 sJ. and Lot 4 equals 75,675 s.f. The property is located on the n/w corner of New Suffolk Road and Cedars Road in Cutchogue. SCTM# 109-6-9.1 Southold Town PlanninG Board PaGe Twentv October 17. 2005 Ken Edwards: I will offer the following resolution: WHEREAS, proposal is to subdivide a 4.619-acre parcel into four lots, where Lot 1 equals 67,913 sJ. s.f. Lot 2 equals 40,621 s.f., Lot 3 equals 40,082 sJ. and Lot 4 equals 44,830 sJ.; and WHEREAS, an application for sketch approval was submitted on November 20. 2001 but remained inactive during the Town's moratorium; and WHEREAS, on February 14, 2005, the application was reclassified as a Standard Subdivision and was required to be resubmitted in conformance with Chapter A106: "Subdivision of Land of the Code of the Town of South old"; and WHEREAS, the applicant resubmitted a sketch plan on June 20, 2005 and the Existing Resource Site Analysis Plan (ERSAP) on September 23, 2005; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board start the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this unlisted action; GeorGe Solomon: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. Ken Edwards: and be it further RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board credits the $3,000 in previously paid fees towards the new application. Bill Cremers: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. ********************************************* Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Twenty-One October 17. 2005 SITE PLANS Conditional Final Extensions: CutchoQue Harbor Marina: This proposed site plan is for an existing marina to include 18,029 sq. ft. of existing buildings, 120 existing boat slips, 92 existing parking spaces, 4 buildings including 1 apartment, 1 single-family dwelling, office, bathroom and accessory building on a 3.9-acre parcel in the MI Zone located at the intersection of West Road and West Creek Avenue, on the w/s/o West Creek Avenue, in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-110-1-12 Georqe Solomon: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes a site plan for an existing marina to include 18,029 sq. ft. of existing buildings, 120 existing boat slips, 92 existing parking spaces, 4 buildings including 1 apartment, 1 single family dwelling, office, bathroom and accessory building on a 3.9 acre parcel in the MI Zone; and WHEREAS, Cutchogue Harbor Marina, Inc. is the owner of the property located at the intersection of West Road and West Creek Avenue, on the w/s/o West Creek Avenue, in Cutchogue, SCTM#1000-110-1; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2004, the Planning Board granted conditional final approval which expired in six months on April 4, 2005; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2005, the Planning Board granted a six month extension to the conditional final approval which expired on October 4, 2005; and WHEREAS, on October 3, 2005, the applicant requested that the Planning Board consider granting an extension to the conditional final approval; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional six-month extension from October 4, 2005 to April 10, 2006 to the conditional final approval on the site plans prepared and certified by John T. Metzger, Surveyor, dated October 30, 2003 and last revised September 15, 2004, subject to fulfillment of the following requirements: 1. Final approval by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. 2. Submission and execution of a drainage easement between the owner and the Town of Southold. Bill Cremers: Second. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. South old Town Planninq Board Paqe Twenty-Two October 17. 2005 Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. ********************************************* SITE PLANS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW ACT Uncoordinated Reviews: BCB Realty HoldinQ Corp.: This site plan is for the demolition of an existing restaurant building, proposed new construction of two buildings that includes a building on the els with 3,964 sq. ft. of first floor office space and a 3,706 sq. ft. second floor apartment space with three apartments, and a building on the wls with 4,424 sq. ft. of commercial bank space with drive up teller service on a 1.41 acre parcel in the B Zone located on the nlslo NYS Road 25 approximately 259' wlo Moore's Lane also known as 74825 Main Road in Greenport. SCTM# 1000-45-4-8.3 Ken Edwards: I would like to entertain the following: WHEREAS, the proposed action involves the demolition of an existing restaurant building, proposed new construction of two buildings that includes a building on the els with 3,964 sq. ft. of first floor office space and a 3,706 sq. ft. second floor apartment space with three apartments, and a building on the wls with 4,424 sq. ft. of commercial bank space with drive up teller service on a 1.41 acre parcel in the B Zone located on the nlslo NYS Road 25 approximately 259' wlo Moore's Lane known as 74825 Main Road in Greenport. SCTM# 1000-45-4-8.3; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiate the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this unlisted action. Bill Cremers: Second. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. ********************************************* South old Town Planninq Board Paqe Twentv- Three October 17, 2005 OTHER Review Extensions: Matt-a-Mar Marina Expansion: This amended site plan is for new boat storage building of 28,480 sq. ft. and new 2 story office of 6,778 sq. ft. on an 8.5-acre parcel in the M-II Zone located on the wlslo Wickham Avenue approximately 210' nlo Freeman Avenue, known as 2255 Wickham Avenue in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-114-3-1 WHEREAS, the proposed action involves an amended site plan for a new boat storage building of 28,480 sq. ft. and new 2-story office of 6,778 sq. ft. on an 8.5-acre parcel in the M-II Zone located approximately 210' nlo Freeman Avenue on the wlslo Wickham Avenue, known as 2255 Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, SCTM#1000-114-3-1; and WHEREAS, on March 14,2005 the South old Town Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, on September 23, 2005, the applicant's agent has responded and the information will require additional review and a new site plan and the Planning Board agreed to allow additional time for the submission of supplemental information prior to the South old Town Planning Board issuing a determination of significance; and WHEREAS, on August 8,2005, the Southold Town Planning Board has established itself as lead agency pursuant to SEQRA; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, leaves the significance determination open pending submission of supplemental information. Ken Edwards: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? And that motion carries. **************************************** Matt-a-Mar Bv the Bav: This site plan proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of a 153-boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25-acre parcel in the M-II Zone, located on the elslo First Street approximately 32' slo King Street also known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 South old Town Planninq Board Paqe Twentv-Four October 17. 2005 Georqe Solomon: WHEREAS. the proposed action involves a site plan that proposes 17 boat racks storing 9 boats per rack for a total of 153-boat capacity, 10 wet boat slips, use of an existing restaurant and storage building on a 3.25-acre parcel in the Mil Zone located on the elslo First Street approximately 32' slo King Street known as 650 First Street in New Suffolk. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NYSCRR Regulations Part 617 (SEQR), on May 11,2005, the Town of Southold Planning Board informed the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that the Town of Southold Planning Board requested to establish itself as Lead Agency for the proposed action; and WHEREAS. on October 17, 2005, the applicant's agent has not submitted any new supplemental information for review and the Planning Board agreed to allow additional time for the submission of supplemental information prior to the Southold Town Planning Board issuing a determination of significance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review Act the applicant will be financially responsible for costs of preparing the Environmental Impact Statement; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has established itself as lead agency pursuant to SEQRA; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, leaves the significance determination open pending submission of supplemental information. Ken Edwards: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? And that motion carries. **************************************** APPROVAL OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Chairperson Woodhouse: I will entertain a motion to approve the June 13, 2005 minutes. Bill Cremers: So moved. Ken Edwards: Second. Southold Town Planninq Board Paqe Twenty-Five October 17. 2005 Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? Those minutes are approved. Is there anyone else who needs to address the Board this evening? I will entertain a motion to adjourn. Ken Edwards: So moved. Bill Cremers: Second. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? This meeting is adjourned. Thank you very much. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 6:53 p.m. Respectfully Submitted: ~f~ Linda Randolph, Transcription Secretary RECEIVeD ot.~ / .;; :0 s- ,,<<- ~~dTC1.~k'~ ou l!V~ (,'..1l1I-~rk-