HomeMy WebLinkAboutOregon Road Recycling, Inc
-.
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
RECYCLING AND SALVAGE FACILITY PERMIT
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
This is to certify that L_...._ ll. e. :..., of the Town
of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, whose
place of business is at 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue, is
hereby granted a RECYCLING AND SALVAGE FACILITY
PERMIT by the Town Board of the Town of Southold on
April 9, 1991, subject to the conditions specified in the
Town Board's resolution adopted on April 9., 1991, attached
to and made a part of this. Permit.
In Witness Whereof I have set my hand and the Seal
of the Town of Southold this 12th day of April, 1991.
$~d ~~
C/ Judith T. Terry (/
Town Clerk \
Town of SouthoJd
SEA L
'.
/-
\
(
(
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL ST A TISTIC$
MARRIAGE OFFlCER
~
'__c_",:""/_-"..~,...
," ---~~' -: :...:=-:::.,
I._t~. .;;~;;:..."
- t tl'~--;;:~
~~!I1:~'~f::5::/
-:-~'..,:;/
-.<~~
Town HaiL 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 9, 1991:
WHEREAS, Jeanne M. Grim, President of Oregon
application dated December 9, 1990, applied to the
Recycling and Salvage Facility Permit at her property
Cutchogue; and
WHEREAS, a Long Environmental Assessment Form was submitted with the
application, and reviewed by Cramer, Voorhis & Associates on behalf of the Town
Board; and
Road Recycling Inc.,
Southold Town Board
located at 11910 Oregon
by
for a
Road,
WHEREAS, after due notice the Southold Town Board issued a Conditioned Negative
Declaration with respect to said application, pursuant to Article 8 of the
Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review Act, and
6NYCRR Part 617.6(h), and Chapter LIL1 of the Code of the Town of Southold; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Board _ found that the proposed use is compatible with
the site, environmental impacts are expected to be minimal, and mitigation measures
are available to minimize potential environmental effects which will be addressed in
the conditions of granting this permit; and
WHEREAS, the proposed recycling and salvage facility site is presently in active use
by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., being used for the purpose of excavation and
drainage contracting, soil screening, and offices, which use is being conducted in
accordance with a Planning Board approved si.te plan, and Zoning Board of Appeals
authorization, as well as an approved wood chipping operation; and
WHEREAS, the proposed use involves the addition of recycling facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid removal,
crushing or cutting) and shipping off site; now, therefore, be it
\
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby grants Jeanne M.
Grim, President of Oregon Road Recycling Inc., a Recycling and Salvage Facility
Permit as requested, for the facility to be located at 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue,
New York, subject to the following conditions:
(1) The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage
areas, must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the
Town of Southold Planning Board for review and approval. The Planning Board
should make a separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the
site plan submitted, in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
.(2) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
manufacturers specifications for the -concrete/asphalt crusher, which specify
noise and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared
against applicable standards. to ensure compliance, and or need for specific
setback, sighting or additional mitigation measures.
. "..
(
r
,
"
(
(
i
(3) The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9 :00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance
with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(4) Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 30-days from the date of acceptance,
in accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
(5) The facility shall be operated in a manner which will eliminate or control
nuisances such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with
the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste Engineer,
dated December 10, 1990.
(6) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
estimated truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact
upon local roadways. -
(7) All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage
facility in an identified area. There shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drums
for storage of toxic or hazardous materials, contained within the building at
anyone time. There shall be no floor drains within the building. Compliance
with these conditions shall be determined by the Building Inspector prior to
the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and subsequent inspections as
necessary.
(8) All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified
Industrial Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in
certain heating equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility,
provided it is conducted in accordance with all applicable New York State and
Suffolk County requi rements.
(9) The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the pUl"pose of ensul"ing
compliance with the above conditions. The applicant shall file a covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
*
*
*
(See attached for Condition No. 10 adopted on November 26, 1991.)
(See attached for amendment to reflect issuance of permit to Oregon Road Recycling
and an amendment to Condition No. 3 adopted on December 10, 1991.)
\
, '/~~
~//a::c:~~
rTudith T. Terr,Y . c1 .
Southold Town Clerk
April 12, 1991
. .
(
(
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATiSTiCS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
\"-:.
i'. ."
" -
i -
/ . ~
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
',"!-
--
"
-:-'-"--
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 26, 1991:
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby amends
their Resolution No. 23, adopted on April 9, 1991, by adding one further
condition:
"( 1 0) By the filing and compliance of the Covenants and
Restrictions this Recycling and Salvage Facility shall be deemed a permanent
use on the subject premises."
\
/d/-~~~
~Terry (/
Southold Town Clerk
November 27, 1991
(
(
"
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
'"i,
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERIIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 10. 1991:
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby amends
their resolution no. 23, adopted on April 9. 1991, to reflect the issuance of
a Recycling and Salvage Facility Permit to Oregon Road Recycling Inc..
rather than to Jeanne M. Grim. President of Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
and be it further
RESOLVED that condition (3) of said permit, with respect to the
concrete/asphalt crusher, shall only be operated between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The applicant shall file a
covenant to ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the
Town Attorney."
\
~~~
Judith T. T~rryO'
Southold Town Clerk
December 11. 1991
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART 3
OREGON ROAD RECYCLING
OREGON ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK
Prepared for: Mr. & Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Prepared by: H2M Group
575 Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747
OCTOBER 1991
Ii~MGROUP
HOLZMACHER. McLENDON & MURRELL., P.C.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS . ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . SCIENTISTS . SURVEYORS
MELVILLE,N,y, TOTOWA, N,J,
.
.
" i//..'_VJ.'... _~)._
,01' ,,~fFOl" '~
,v ~", ,,~C,
i'::::''' , ~~
'.'~ ~,. ~\\
'j'a ~,.". ~
'\~ en
,-,~ t,1
'~, 0 ,,- ;~ ,\.
'_' Jl~"-~-'
, '>~
"'" ?/01 .
'0".," ',;'
-r,t) - T7'1-
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Fax (516) 765-1823
RECEIVED
NOV 1 1991
October 31, 1991
SouthoId T o....n derlc
RE: Oregon Road Recycling
SCTMl1000-83-3-4.5
Cutchogue, NY
Dear Reviewer:
On August 12, 1991, the Southold Town Planning Board
started the coordination process on this proposal to develop a
recycling and salvage facility.
Shortly thereafter, we asked the applicant to complete Part
III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form in order to
provide the additional information that would be needed to reach
a determination.
In order to assist you in your review, we have enclosed a
corrected Part I, a completed Part II and the recently completed
Part III, along with a revised site plan (dated as received:
July 22, 19991).
Please respond with issues of concern within thirty (30)
days of the date of this letter.
Sincerely,
~~~~0k
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. :)
Chairman
Encls.
cc: Board of Appeals
Building Department
Southold Town Board v/
Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services
NYSDEC - Stony Brook
NYSDEC - Albany
Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc.
.. '
I
.,' (
"-. .~\\~~ !/fl.&.
CRAMER, VOQ'RHI . &~S$OCIATES
ENVIRONMENT~~D;:tml\lt~G CONSULTANTS
(
c'Xu">F/l...i:.. -
1'6
~/.,;
September 3, 1991
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Southold Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re:
Oregon Road Recycling Co.
SCTM No: 1000-83-3-4.5
Dear Benny:
We are in receipt of your letter of August 12, 1991, requesting that we complete a
review of the proposed project including review and correction of the Part lEAF,
completion of the Part II EAF, and consultation as to how to proceed with review of this
project in accord with the State Environmental Quality Review Act.
Please be advised that we have reviewed the documentation forwarded to this office.
A copy of the corrected Long EAF Part I, and the completed Long EAF Part II are included
as an attachment to this letter. In addition, we have inspected the site and offer the
following information with regard to review procedures.
The site is presently in active use by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., for the I?urpose of
excavation and drainage contracting, soil screening and offices. This use is bemg conducted
in accord with a previously approved site plan as well as Zoning Board of Appeals
authorization. The proposed use involves the addition of recycling facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid removal, crushing or
cutting) and shipping off the site.
In terms of existing site and environmental resources, soils and vegetation have been
modified. The site is predominantly rock, earth and fill; however some landscaping has been
completed near the road frontage. There were no significant vegetation or wildlife resources
identified. The site is within Groundwater Management Zone IV and is in the northern
border of the Water Budget Area designated by SCDHS. The depth to groundwater is
approximately 60 feet, and groundwater beneath the site migrates north. It is noted that
mtrate and aldicarb contamination have been identified in the vicinity of the site, and there
is a landfill upgradient of the site which is under investigation to determine impact on the
aquifer. It is suspected that the landfill site may have caused groundwater degradation.
The site is zoned for industrial use. The area surrounding the site, east to Cox's
Land, west approximately 750 feet to Depot Land and south to North Road is also zoned
industrial. There are intermittent industrial uses in this area. The area north of Oregon
Road is zoned "A-C" district. Land use conflicts of the transition from industrial to "A-C"
district were considered by the Planning Board in the previous site plan approval which
required a 100 foot setback for the facility from Oregon Road. The subject application
should also be reviewed in the context of minimizing impacts from this transition. The roads
Page 1 oC3
54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455
.<
(
(
Oregon Road Recycling
Environmental Review
in the area include Oregon Road (east-west minor road to north), Cox's Lane (north-south-
minor road to west), Depot Lane (north-south minor road to east), and North Road (east-
west 4 land divided highway to south). These roads are presently underutilized; however,
expansion industrial uses in the area and potential COnflict with residential street traffic
should be considered in connection with the proposed project.
The Town Board has considered this action in the authorization of a Recycling and
Salvage Facility under Town Code Section 48-1. The use is consistent solid waste
management goals of reducing the waste stream through recycling; however, impacts with
regard to the specific use must be considered. The Town Board recognized this and
included many conditions of the approval for this use. These conditions are included in a
Conditioned Negative Declaration for the use dated March 1, 1991. The nine (9) conditions
included in the determination provide the Planning Board with a basis for review of the
project.
Based upon review of the conditions, and the information presented to date, we find
that a Part III Long EAF should be prepared to address concerns with regard to the specific
site use. The Long EAF Part III is recommended as a means of addressing specific concerns
prior by providing additional information necessary to render a Determination of
Significance with regard to this action. The Part II EAF indicates the impact areas - in
addition, specific requests for information are keyed to the nine (9) Town Board conditions
as follows:
1)
The applicant should provide a detailed site plan indicating the location of all
structural site improvements (including concrete/asphalt crusher. As of the date of
this letter, we have not received this information.
Preliminary review of the noise data indicate possible impact due to noise levels. The
location of the equipment must be known to determine levels at locations from the
machinery. In addition, sound barriers (if needed) or sound reduction equipment
which may be available as an accessory on the equipment should be explored. In
addition, we find no information concerning dust emissions from equipment as
required by the Town Board.
The applicant should provide a covenant regarding hours of operation. An update of
the status of this mitigation measure required by the Town Board should be provided.
The source of recycling material should be indicated in order to assess compliance
with previous conditions of the operation.
A program for mitigation of noise, dust, odors, and vectors should be provided by the
applicant in order for the Town to have a means of dealing with complaints and Issues
should they arise.
The basis for vehicle trip ends should be provided. The peak hourly trip generation
should be indicated. In addition, the primary hours of expected truck ingress and
egress to the site should be indicated.
The status of the waste oil containment shed approval should be indicated. Plans for
construction of this facility should be provided.
The means of disposal of collected fluids should be indicated. If an industrial waste
scavenger is proposed to be used, the name of the scavenger should be provided.
The applicant should provide a covenant regarding allowed access to the site by Town
Officials and/or legitimately designated Town representatives. An update of the
status of this mitigation measure required by the Town Board should be provided.
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
CRAMER, va~1\ i~SOCIATES
ENVIRONMENT~'~G CONSULTANTS
Page 2 00
(
(
Oregon Road Recycling
Environmental Review
The information requested above should be rrovided by the ap{llicant. Information
should be submitted in the basic format of a Part II Long EAF providmg a discussion of the
significance of the impact and proposed mitigation to minimize the impact. I believe that
the applicant is best able to provide this information for review by the Board. If you wish
CV A to review the submitted documentation, we would be pleased to provide a cost
estimate to review the material once submitted.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this review, and please do not
hesitate to call if you have any questions.
Very ~ YOj.lrs,
zr:~
arlesJ.~~:~
~~~~
CRAMER, VQ' RHI .. SOCIATES
ENVIRONMENT~'; ~ ~G CONSULTANTS
Page 3 of3
..
/s
( ART 1-PROJECT INFORMATlbJ'J
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant ef
on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considr
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additic
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not inY<
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate and spe.
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION .--...,' . ~
DreG c '" ~ci. "'1<::<:. C L. C i I Y\.(1 C.OY'D.
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Slre.~ess. Municipality ~ County)
I q I 0 eVE:' '(AI ~d. (~+rh:.Cv->-
NAME OF APPLlCANT/SPON
.::::reaYln"'-. 9- O\r\C~ l d
ADDRE~O ~'I< ~
CITY/PO IV I
L.AA.:n::....h o::r l.<.L
NAME O~ OWNER (If differen;t-.;
~ e'<ly) '" c. (: v, vr--
AODRES_S_ ::::?
. -r:X::nG :::s::::::>c,
CITY/PO J ZIP CODE
C>-^__-+c. '1 '--"--- I 1'1:::>':)-
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION .. I-. J
- "";-C - c-I, bc.t\.4j -+0 ha.v-.d Ie. Y\UVV\L.YCu'S -=P<O cLv-c.;"", n V'e..(U~
~ '.~-A._,.,^", 'V)'+O-fv,^-,Y"\.iQV1dhll(<-""~ ~-kl tt.-:'-p~+;~c
--'-'-. W<l-"Sr-<- ...>,r"<-,L I '\ . ,J ..L.. ,"L- JJ.- UL.f1:J ~
-,YI-<. h ) -~Q..J",vl J('(()L<.<'.ts,c"k..) \--jc",,--Id 1'1<."-- 10 .::>....v Y-..L1"0~~'1 ,
"Sn.\l'Y'p~, bY-~, ~~\~'to,,- a.<.. ..L 1 v-€.-"--C--I'v-"- .:t.ppnry,ds 4-z...-"... <LIt Y-~' .11. r-O-I,
~~~~ .
r 100
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable ~U1Y 1'1-i';>1?() VIh. 7lJ
"'-~YC-I-I^4 l=t1-cJu7';l
A. Site Description /NlI)~7R11h.- ~/ll:T
Physical setting of overall project. both jleveloped and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: DUrban mlndustrial DCommercial DResidential (suburban)
DForest DAgriculture DOther
';.0
" ,
~V-IV"l--'
("?
.:::'u.FFOI-'K'
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
(:::ill) TY '707'6
-~
Ilq3~
t.0C/;-c'
aNrJ7Jn~
DRural (non-far
2. Total acreage of project area: acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0.3 acres 0.3 acres
Forested acres acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards. cropland. pasture, etc.) acres acres
W'etland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECl) acres acres
Water Surface Area acres acres
Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) /1.0 acres ...9 acres
Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces' 0./ acres O. Z. a,res
Other (Indicate type) .c-~:2.. apP,oyC'd <:;, k pI"", 0./ acres " I acres
. I H,,"YIS7V. t.Q/fH IN S()IL.. SUI2v,
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on prolect site? "")t1.nrl i ~l'Cl,..--- Curl ;://l {~": J:/b/A C()f'
a. Soil drainage: sWell drained 100 % of ~ite DModerately wcll dralncd ~~ of site n(
DPoorly drained % of Site
b. If any agricultural land is involved7 how many acres of soil are claSSified Within sod gro P through 4 of the N\
land Classification System? ,J _,,< acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).
I
4. Are there bedrock outcropplngs on project site? DYes lBN~
a. What is depth to bedrock? -600:t: 1=r. [in feet)
2
o'
t
..5. A~X1 ate percentage of propos' roject S1t'l.with slopes:
l.OC;tuUSl) F/iC ~~ $V(c.~
10 ~ swPt:r .
6. Is roject substantially contiguous to. or co~in a building, site. or district, listed on the State or the Nation
Registers of Historic Places? DVes rs;(No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site_list~ ~n the Register of National ~Landmarks?
8. What is the depth of the water table? 70 8:'> (,,(!~) roO.:!: FGGr ~
9. Is site located over a primary, principal. or sole source aquifer? DVes ErNo
10. Do hunting. fishing or shell fishing opportunities presentlv exist in the project area?
11. Does project site c9Ptain' 'any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangerer
DVes [ii(No According to INSPFc:n-oAl!?V CV-1
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e.. cliffs. dunes. other geological formation
DVes ~ Describe
I
Mri-l0% J- _ %
015% or greater
010-15%
~'o
DYes
01
DVes
rnNo
13.
Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation are,
DVes S'No If yes, explain
Does the present si.9' include scenic views known to be important to the community?
DVes GNo. J, J
Streams within or contiguous to project area: YA - ~
,
a. .Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
14.
15.
16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name
r-l/A - rJ6"'~
b. Size (In acres)
61 c. cA-.......c-
~s DNo /
DYes I!rNo
to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA
Is the site served by -existing public utilities? GY:s DNo
a) If Ves. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?
b) If Ves, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
Is the site located in an agricultural Pistrict certified pursuant
Section 303 and 304? DVes ~No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous,}<> a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? DVes. ~No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DVes ~
17.
18.
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropri~te) _
a. Tot~1 contiguous acreage owned or c~r~y proJ.e~t. sponsor . ~ acres. '.
b. Project acreage to be developed: , acres Initially; , S-- acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain unden'oped ;JD nc.. acres. . H4>0stsO L -~n
d. Length of project. i~ miles: tJ.1A- (If appropriate) J ~cr,4.Ah) /e~
e. If the project is an expansion. indicate percent of expansion proposed N / fr %; CYCqNl.~.ns-.
f. Number of off.street parking spaces existing 10 ; proposed ' .
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 6 (upon completion of project)? .
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: r-I/f1' SeD' S/7l!T ~
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure .,:;is- height; 10
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?
3
width; 1-0
. 30. 'it.
length.
( . . (.. t (. ( . '. .
:). How much natural matenal \I.e... ,<. earth, ....tc;) wll!)'e remolled from the Slte' 4f1-- tons/cubic yards
3. \ViII disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes . ~o-~. ~A
a. If yes, for what intend,,,: purpose is the site being reclaimed? .
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes ~
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes ~
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs. ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres.
5. \ViII any mature torest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this pro~
DYes g'No _ ~
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 0 months. (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased: tJ;f'r' --pvo .J~~~():~b:~~:~
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). CYCUtV/, FA-CIU TIC;;S 1'1201"()lS G:L
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolitionl.
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year.
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? DYes DNo
8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes I ~
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction N / f'r ; after project is complete
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project rjlfr
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
~h
/
DYes
~
If yes, explain
12.
~.
23.
Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes
a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial. etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes ~ Type
\Viii surface area of an existing ~ater body increase or decrease by proposal?
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain?
\ViII the project generate solid waste? DYes ~
a. If yes. what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste fa'cility be used? DYes DNo
c. If yes, give name location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
e. If Yes, explain . II~ h""" ~"" vd-llcl..,.j ,,_ k-ad .. V1 <s I"'e'"
~b<.ls 61\~v~-o--r.bur"lo1~d ,"" eL ~~)k ell +<'~. \-\(.&.o.kA/ ......nt..-r.. Pr.~ IS \
j 'DE<' ,
Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste?
a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal?
b. II yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes ~
Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes
\ViII project produ~e ope.rating n~ise exceeding the local ambiensvoise levels?
Will project result In an Increase In energy use? DYes mNo
If yes, indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is from wells. indicate pumping capacity /,;:;- rgallons/minute. t'y"~ ~d.A (
Total anticipated water usage per day d?S- gallons/day. /68 t: 6~o~ ~-Jd-
Does project involve local. State or Federal funding? DYes BNo tJo i- tt. -I <..I'M-.. 'f ~
If Yes. explain
13.
14.
DYes
~ to/1J
DYes
No
16.
,17,
DYes
~
t:
DNo
tons/month.
18.
19.
~
20,
DYes
~
21,
2~.
4
.
t
25. Approvals Required: (
City, Town, Village Board
City, Town, Village Planning Board
City, Town Zoning Board
City, County Health Department
Other Local Agencies
Other Regional Agencies .'
State Agencies
Federal Agencies
m%s
~es
DYes
~es
DYes
DYes
8?e's
DYes
D~
9No
ONo
QNo
~o
GJNo
DNo
gNo
.
{
(
Type
'5I'~;f-z.... p~_
...-.-ovVV'\ ~D a. vd
!{'/77f:' PL.o+1v A?PI'Ul V/h
:<:A-N,r:+-f2.Y /~ ofHJ~-,/
/
Submill.,
Date
A'IW.?()V f"O
~
#-4"'-~1
/fPPhOV,,",
"l-'''-'''1t
;okv YO., :;<e.o,~,,.-eS' --r """" ':-PP.-cnJ ;::;. 5" h....,
NYSO~ u~~~no~ ~r~bo
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision?
If Yes, indicate decision required:
Dzoning amendment Dzoning variance Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision ~te plan
Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother
2. What is the zoning c1assification(s)of the site? L.::L, lx:(ht.....-G.."'.l.L.Sh--,a....(
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
.d."", ClC vi? c.
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? y~,C \ \ "-l2t ~-\a..v- S/7C' PLAN /1-NCfINJ.
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permilled by the proposed zoning?
t./. C-~ S
~
~
aJ~ -mile?
. VA
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? es 0
7. What are the predominant land users) and zoning classifications within a V. mile radius of proposed action?
L.-:r::, -\-z, &s+- L,-,<~+ ; S,~-th I'-..C:. . ....-c..",> 'S'-\-. -\---., W~
a. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within
9. If the proposed action .is the subdivisi,on of land, how ')",ny lots are proposed?
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~
Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts?
Will the proposed actisP create p demand for any community provided services (recreation,
fire protection)? rn1es ClNo b>e. ?vv-ie..e...t--n..-...-... ,
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~es 1::..';0
Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels?
. a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes
10.
11.
12.
es 0
DYes B'
education, poli,
DYes Of'
ErN' 0 .
D. Informational Details
Allach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are Or may be any adver
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate
avoid them. 1':.G'Y1G:W(s(;)' Qy: ~ ~V. J1:, O/?/fJ.s A-..1:C.,c.
E. Verification a - 2t3 -q} I
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. . ---. I _. \_
Applicant/Spq1J:;'or Namp -=tftt~"e.. (5,...-".V' Date ~
Signature 4i")/l-~ I1T"'~ Title T.Y"''Sld~+
If Ihe aClio~s in Ihe Coastal (\rea, and you are a sl.,le agency, complele the Coastal Assessment Form before proceedic
with this assessment.
5
'r-
Part 2-PRC'(:CT IMPACTS AND THEIR MW"~ITUDE
lnponslblUty 01 lud Alcncy \
GeM,al Information (Read Carelully)
. In completina the form the reviewer should be auided by the question: Have my responses and "~terminations bee
rea.cuublel The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
. Identifyina that an impact will be potentially larae (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily sllnllicut.
Any larae impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine sianificance. Identifyina an impact in column 2 simp
asks that it be looked at lurther.
. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showina types 01 impacts and wherever possible the threshold (
maanitude that would triner a response in column 2. The examples are aenerally applicable throuahout the State ar
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples andJor lower thresholds may be appropria
for a Potential Larae Impact response. thus requirina evaluation in Part 3.
. The Impacts 01 each project. on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore. the examples are illustrative ar
have been offered as auidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answef each questic
. The number 01 examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
. In identilyina impacts. consider lonaterm, short term and cumlative effects.
'nstructloM (Read carefully)
a. Answer each 01 the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answerina Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of t
impact. II impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. II impact will occur but threshc
is lower than example, check column .1:
d. If reviewer has doubt about size 01 the impact then consider the impact as potentially larae and proceed to PART
e. If a potentially larae impact checked in column 2 can be mitiaated by chanae(s) in the project to a small to mode"
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. T:
. must be explained in Part 3. .
IMPACT ON LAND
1. Will the propoSed action result in a physical chaoae to ~ project sitef
~O DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Any construction on slopes 01 15% or areater, (15 foot rise per 100
foot of length). or where the aeneral slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than
3 feet.
. Construction of paved parkina area for 1,000 or more vehicles.
. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or aenerally within
3 feet of existing around surface.
.. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more
than one phase or stage. .
. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000
tons of natural matedal (i.~.. rock or soil) per year.
. Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill.
. Construction in a designated f100dway.
. Other impacts
2. Will there be an effect t,. ..oV unique or unusual land .~s found on
the site! (i.e., c1ills. dunes, aeoloaicallormations, etcRO DYES
. Specilic land forms:
6
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact B
Moderate Large MItigated By
- tmPaCi Impact Project Chan{
0 0 DYes DN<
0 0 Dyes oN<
0 0 Dyes ON
0 0 DYes ON
0 0 DYes ON
0 0 DYes ON
0 0 DYes ON
0 0 DYes Ot'>
0 0 DYes Or--
0 0 Dyes DI'-
r-
(
IMPACT ON WATER
3 Will proposed action affect any water body desianlled as protected!
(Under Articles 1S. 24. 2S of the Environmental conse~tion law. ECl)
. 0 DYES
bamples that would apply to column 2
. Developable arel of site contains a protected water body.
. Dredaina more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a
protected strum.
. Extension of utility distribution facilities throuah a protected water body.
. Construction in a desianated freshwater or tidal wetland.
. Other impacts:
4. will proposed action affect any non-protected existina or new body
of water? DNO DYES
bamples that would apply to column 2
. A 10% incruse or decrease in the surface area of any body of water
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.
. Other impacts:
S. Will Propos'ed Action affect surface or aroundwater ~
quality or quantity!. DNO ES
b~mples that would apply ll? column 2
. Proposed Action will require a discharae permit.
. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not
have approval to, serve proposed (project) action.
. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with areater than 4S
aallens per minute pumpina tapacity.
. Construction Of operation causina any contamination of a water
supply system.'
. Proposed Action will adversely affect aroundwater.
. liquid effluent will be conveye<l off the site to facilities whi.h presently
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 aallons per
day.
. Proposed Action will Iihf.. U.';P siltation or other discharae into an
existinll body of wat", tv tt.", ~':Icnt that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
. Proposed Action will require the storaae of petroleum or chemical
products areater than 1.100 aallons.
. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water
andlor sewer services.
. Proposed Action locates commercial andlor industrial uses which may
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment andlor storaae
f aeilities.
. Other impacts: HT.JL.J ry MfJ,<( r PRIJ?t::Y?1. 'I OJN~N
/nJJi SN1Rt<"" /hi.. CfHrMlr./h Wt/S"J7f::"" I=LUIr,<::
f..)' Will proposed action alter drainaae flow or patterns. or suriace
_ water runoHl DNO DYES
Eu:nples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action would chanae flood water flows.
7
1\. 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact 8<
Moderate Large MItigated By
Impact Impact Project Chang
0 0 DYes ONc
0 0 DYes ONe
0 0 Dyes ONe
0 0 DYes ON'
0 0 DYes ON'
0 0 DYes ON'
0 0 DYes ON
0 0 DYes ON
. .~.
0 0 DYes ON
0 - 0 DYes 0,.,
0 0 DYes Of'
..
0 0 Dyes Of'
0 0 Dyes O~
0 0 DYes O~
0 0 DYes O~
0 0 DYes C~
0 0 DYes Ot
0 0 Dyes Or
0 0 DYes 0:
0 X ~es 0
0 0 DYes 0
c
(
o Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
o Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns.
o Proposed Action will allow development in a designated f100dway.
o Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AIR
DNO ~ES
7. will proposed action affect air quality?
Eumples that would apply to column 2
o Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given
hour.
o Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of
refuse per hour.
o Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed Sibs. per hour or a
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
o Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed
to industrial use.
o Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial
development within existing industrial areas.
o Other impacts:
1
v
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIM
8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or enda~ed
species? . ~O DYES
Eumples that would apply to column 2 I
o Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York 0( Federal
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
o Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat
o Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other
than for agricultural purposes.
o Other impacts:
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threat~ or
non-endangered species? ~O DYES
Eumples that would apply to column 2
o Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
o Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land r~rces?
~O DYES
Eumples that would apply to column 2
. The proposed action would sever, cross or limitlccess to agricultural
land (includes cropland, hayfields. pasture, vineyard. orchard, etc.)
8
Sm~lIt[
Moderate
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
D
2
Potential
Large
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
x
D
o
o
o
o
o
3
Can Impact Be
MItigated By
ProJact Change
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
oNo
oNo
oNo
oNo
Dyes oNo
DYes oNo
DYes oNo
DYes oNo
Dyes oNo
~es oNo
Dyes
Dyes
DYes
Dyes
DYes
DYes
o
-oNo
oNo
oNo
oNo
oNo
oNo
Dyes oNo
. '
(
. Construction ,ctivity would excav,te or comp,ct the soil profile of
agricultur,1 I,nd.
. The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of agricultur,1 I,nd or. if located in an Agricultut,1 District more
~n 2.5 ,cres of 'gricultur,1 land.
. The propOsed ,ction would disrupt Of prevent instaU,tion of 'gricultural
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines. outlet ditches.
strip croppinaJ; Of create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a fum
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resourcesl ~O DVES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21.
Appendix B.) .
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed land uses. or project components obviously different from
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns. whether"
man-made or natural.
. Proposed land uses, or project components mible' t~ users of
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
Project components that will result in the elimination or significant
Kreening of scenic views known to be important to the ,re,.
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure Vistoric. pre-
historic or paleontological importancel ~O DVES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially
contiguOUS to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the
project site.
. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for
archaeological sites on the NVS Site Inventory.
. Other impacts:
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities!
_ Examples that would apply to column 2 ~O DVES
( lThe permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity.
'''t"' A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
. Other impacts:
-- g
1 (' 2 3
Small to Potential Can Im~ct Be
Moderate Large MItigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
0 0 oVes DNa
0 0 oVes DNa
0 0 DYes DNa
i
0 0 oVes DNa
.
0 0 DVes oNo
-
0 0 Dyes oNo
0 0 DVes DNo
0 0 DYes DNa
0 0 oVes oNo
0 0 oVes ONe>
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 DVes DNo
0 0 DYes DNo
0 0 Dyes DNa
0 0 Dves DNa
({
IMPACT ON TRANSppRTATION
'4. Will there be an effect to existina transportation systemsl
DNa ~ES
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or aoads.
. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems.
. Other impacts: PI2"pnSE:fJ ltrJ7iOAJ (AhU- (j~~
7t:l U ~ 7'f2.A.I:F7 c. IIV
. .
IMPACT ON ENERGY
sou~ of fuel or
~O DYES
'5. Will proposed action affect the community's
eneray supply!
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5 % increase in the use of
any form of energy in the municipality.
. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an enerllY
transmission or supply system to serve more than SO single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
. Other impacts:
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
, (,. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a .[!l.ult
of the Proposed Action! DNa )&:(E5 c
Eumples that would apply to column 2
. Blastina within ',500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility.
. 0000 will occur routim:ly (more than one hour per day~
. Proposed Action will produce ope;~tina 1I0ise exceedina thi"iocaT
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
. Other impacts: Phtl:nr7..'T" ""'1""/ C...,.<....... 1'1t'J,c:.r
.+w IJ (')11 O~ I H fll1TA3 WIHCH- S" 1UJU>.A B i:
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH II> QV7?'-" tXJ
'7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safetyl 'r1t,
DNO /,p
Examples that would apply to column 2
. Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous
substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharae or emission.
. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any
form (Le. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
. Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural
aas or other flammable liquids.
. Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste. ,()
. Other impacts: 1"6TE1V7"'h.- y~,? OIJ(]~ NOISE
I '
dAJ'O /Jvs.r snfJ(/UJ eo ~//J~t'rO
'0
I.~ 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact ~
Moderate Large MItigated By
Impact Impact Project Chang<
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 DYes oNo
0 0 Dyes ONe
0 0 DYes ONe
0 0 DYes ONe
0 0 DYes ON,
-
.11": .
0 0 DYes ON
0 0 DYes ON
- P 0 DYes ON
..
0 0 DYes 0,...
0 ~ DYes Or--
0 0 DYes ot
0 0 DYes Or
0 0 DYes 0:
0 0 DYes 0
0 )( Dyes 0
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART 3
OREGON ROAD RECYCLING
OREGON ROAD, CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK
Prepared for: Mr. & Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Prepared by: H2M Group
575 Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747
OCTOBER 1991
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~GROUP
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART 3
OREGON ROAD RECYCLING INC.
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK
Proposed Action:
Action involves the addition of solid waste recy-
cling facilities to accommodate construction and
demolition debris, automobiles, landscaping yard
waste and trash. Proposed facilities include a
concrete/asphalt crusher and a concrete automobile
crushing pad to be added to the existing excavation
and drainage facility on site.
Location:
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
Town of Southold
SCTM #1000-83-03-4.5
Applicant:
Mr. & Mrs. D. Grim
P.O. Box 300
CUtchogue, NY 11935
Lead Agency:
Planning Board
Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Contact:
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
;E'reparer:
Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C.
575 Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747
Andrew P. Freleng, AICP
Contact:
Date of Preparation: October 28, 1991
Availability of Document: The pages which follow constitute Part 3 of
the Full Environmental Assessment Form submitted by the appli-
cant to the Town of Southold, 12/11/90. Copies are available
for public review and comment at the office of the Lead
Agency. Comments should be submi tted to the Lead Agency
listed above to be included in the public record.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t-aMGROUP
Pursuant to correspondence received by the Applicant from
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman of the Planning Board of the
Town of Southold, this Part 3 of the Full Environmental
Assessment Form is herewith submitted. As directed, all items
enumerated in correspondence to the Planning Board from the
Board's consultant, Cramer, Voorhis and Associates (CVA), have
been addressed in this Part 3 submittal. . Appendix A of this
Part 3 includes correspondence from the Planning Board and
their consultant.
The proposed action is the addition of solid waste recy-
cling facilities to accommodate construction and demolition
debris, automobiles, landscaping yard waste and trash. Pro-
posed facilities include a concrete/asphalt crusher, a con-
crete automobile crushing pad, a hazardous waste storage
building, solid waste sorting building and trucking to be
added to the existing excavation and drainage facilities on
site.
1. 0 Site Plan
It was requested that the applicant provide a detailed
site plan indicating the location of all proposed structural
site improvements. A plan has been submitted, dated February
1, 1990, which was stamped received by the Planning Board July
22, 1991, and forwarded to the Board's consultant, Cramer,
Voorhis and Associates, subsequent to the consultant's letter
-1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~GROUP
requesting this item.
2.0 Noise
Concern was raised about the impact to adj acent proper-
ties from noise levels associated with equipment operation at
the subject site. The subject parcel has been characterized
by the Town's environmental consultant as being situated in an
industrial area east from the site to Cox Lane, west from the
site to Depot Lane and south to North Road. North of the sub-
ject parcel, opposite Oregon Road, is Residential zoning.
Intermittent industrial uses are dispersed throughout the
area. Most significant is the Southold Town Landfill south of
project site. Between the landfill and the southern reaches
of the subject parcel is the truck yard for North Fork Sanita-
tion. This 5.1 acre parcel both shields the subject site from
the noise of the landfill and creates its own noise from truck
movements during its hours of operation.
Existing ambient noise sources consist of equipment
activity at the landfill, the present soil screening plant in
use on the subject site, as well as noise from truck and pas-
senger motor traffic on oregon Road. Irrigation pumps from
surrounding land uses also contribute to the ambient noise.
Fly-bys of crop spraying planes and helicopters intermittently
contribute to the ambient noise in the area of the subj ect
parcel.
-2-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~GROUP
Ambient noise in the area of a landfill/industrial area
can range 40-90 decibels (dB), dependent upon the time of day
and distance to equipment, moving trucks and other vehicles
(McLean, 1988; stanton, '1987; Warren, 1985). Ambient noise is
a function of distance as well. Sound propagation from source
to receiver can be attenuated by the properties of the atmo-
sphere and the presence of any objects or barriers in the
transmission path, such as vegetation, change in topography,
buildings, etc. The sound pressure level generated by a noise
source decreases with increasing distance from the source due
to wave divergence (Rau, 1980).
The intensity of sound generally decreases inversely to
the square of the distance to the point source. The absorp-
tion factor is an empirical number which varies with ground
surface. If the ground cover is vegetated or has a soft tex-
ture, sound will decrease at a rate of 4.5 dB every time the
distance between the source and the receptor is doubled. If
the ground between the source and observer is paved or hard,
then the drop-off rate is only approximately 3 dB every time
the distance is doubled (Rau, 1980).
The shielding factor is another empirical number which
takes into account the environment surrounding the source and
the receptor. The shielding factor states that for every 30
-3-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~GROUP
meters of very dense landscape vegetation (at least 15 feet
high), 5 dB of additional attenuation can be obtained up to a
maximum of 10 dB.
Noise data from machines representative of the one pro-
posed to be utilized on site, was provided by West Texas CAT
Power Systems 7/31/91 (Appendix B). It can be observed from
the provided data that noise levels decrease more or less in
accordance with the above theories. The data provided is also
consistent with studies conducted by McLean '88, Stanton '87
and Warren '85.
Noise levels then, can be predicted for the proposed
action based on the information provided above, the location
of the proposed crusher and the distance to all property lines
or sensitive receptors.
The proposed concrete crusher is to be situated roughly
140 feet west of the eastern property line, 152' east of the
western property line, 340' south of the northern edge of
pavement of Oregon Road and 260' north of the southern prop-
erty line.
Without a vegetative buffer along the east and west prop-
erty lines, it is anticipated, utilizing the above formula,
that noise would be approximately 76-78 dBA. With a 10' vege-
tative buffer, noise would be expected at the lower end,
-4-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~GROUP
around 76 dBA. The northern edge of Oregon Road can be antic-
ipated to have noise level readings from the crusher of less
than 60 dBA, due to the greater distance, the presence of a
vegetative buffer and existing berm and existing and proposed
buildings. At the southern property line, noise can be
expected to be less than 70 dBA, due to the rise in topography
in the most northern corner and the 50' vegetated distance
from the edge of bluestone pavement to the property line.
The car crushing operation is simply no more than a pay-
loader pushing the roof flat on a vehicle for stacking pur-
poses and loading onto an awaiting trailer. The most signifi-
cant noise source would be from the diesel engine of the
machine, around 76 dBA at the western property line, without
any vegetative screening. Noise would be significantly
reduced in any other direction due to the mass of the build-
ings in the existing area of the pad.
A review of ordinances to control noise pollution pro-
vides the following: The Code of the Town of Southold pro-
vides no local guidance on noise regulation other than the
prohibition of offensive noise. The Towns of Southampton and
Brookhaven have ordinances which are well-developed (see
Mclean '88; Warren '85). Based on distances to the proposed
-5-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-UMGROUP
machinery to property lines, a rationale for noise mitigation
can be approached and is discussed in Section 5.0 of this EAF
Part 3.
3.0 Covenant on Hours of Operation
The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated
between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. A covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition shall be filed by the
applicant to the satisfaction of the Town.
4.0 Source of Recvclina Material
The source of recycling material will be from the
Southold area, restricted primarily to the north fork of Long
Island. Composition will be determined from quantities con-
tributed by homeowners, contractors and business construction
and demolition debris.
Only clean concrete and asphalt will be processed by the
Excel 2000 Series crusher. Materials will be stored in accor-
dance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the
Regional Solid Waste Engineer, dated 12/10/90.
5.0 Mitiaation of Noise. Dust. Odors and vectors
5.1 Noise
Noise mitigation is based on the discussion in Item
2.0 of this EAF Part 3. Mitigation is proposed by the
proj ect sponsor in the form of a vegetated buffer
-6-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-J~GROUP
along all property lines. The concrete and asphalt
crusher is also situated to such an extent to minimize
impacts to sensitive receptors. Noise mitigation
beyond what is proposed can be undertaken if war-
ranted. Increasing the vegetative buffer would atten-
uate noise as per the discussion in Section 2.0.
Earthen berms, noise buffering around machinery, etc.
can also be incorporated. However, these are rather
expensive mitigation measures and are not considered
warranted at this time.
5.2 ~
Any time materials, such as concrete, asphalt, etc.,
are crushed, dust will be produced. According to
information supplied by the manufacturer, Excel Recy-
cling & Manufacturing Inc., the dust produced from the
machines is minimal. A mitigation measure to control
dust production from the crusher unit is a mist
sprayer. The spray bar is located in the intake and
discharge areas. To contain more dust, more water in
the mister is needed. A water wagon can be connected
to the crusher for remote operation or a connection
can be made directly to the water supply infrastruc-
ture of the facility. A water wagon is generally more
-7-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ti~GROUP
cost efficient. As a general rule, more dust tends to
be produced when pure substances are crushed, such as
pure concrete, with no other materials mixed in. Mist
level is constantly monitored so as not to produce a
discharge from the operation. Mist is accurately set
so that dust clings to the crushed material and is not
washed off. No runoff will be associated with the
crusher operation.
5.3 Odors
The proposed recycling facility is to accept only
material as described in section 4.0. Material
sources will be limited, as provided in a covenant on
the deed. There are no known odors associated with
typical demolition debris operations similar to the
proposed action.
In the event an odor source can be attributed to the
recycling operation, commercially available fans and
filters can be incorporated into the units and build-
ings to mitigate odors. No odors are anticipated from
the proposed facility.
5.4 Vectors
Vectors, such as rats and mosquitoes, which are
known to carry and transmit pathogens, are not consid-
ered to be a significant environmental hazard of the
-8-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-UMGROUP
proposed action. Construction/demolition recycling
facilities are not typically associated with such nui-
sances. Materials will be stored as per the NYSDEC
Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste
Engineer, dated 12/10/90. Puddling stormwater will be
drained if collecting on the stockpiled material. In
order to avoid providing den and nesting sites for
mammalian vectors dogs, cats, rats, etc., traps or
poisons can be utilized if it is shown that the facil-
ity is a vector source.
Vehicle Trips
Vehicle, trips were estimated by reviewing Town of
Southold Landfill scale house records and estimating those
trips that would bypass the landfill for the new recycling
facility. Those estimated trips were combined with the aver-
age 5-10 trips per day existing within the excavation and
drainage business. Scale house data is provided in Appendix
D.
7.0
6.0
NYSDEC Approval
Plans and application material before the NYSDEC regard-
ing the waste oil containment shed are pending. It is reason-
able to presume that final approval from the Planning Board
-9-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~GROUP
will be conditional upon receipt of a permit from the NYSDEC,
with respect to the waste oil containment shed. Plans for the
shed will be provided to the Planning Board for review.
8.0 Disoosal of Waste Fluids
Disposal of collected waste fluids from the passenger
automobile recycling operation will be handled by a duly
licensed hauler. Copies of receipt between the applicant and
the handler are included in Appendix C.
9.0 Further Covenants
A covenant regarding access to the site by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives will be
provided. It is presumed that this covenant will be reflected
in the issuance of the salvage yard operating permit.
-10-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-UMGROUP
References
Louis K. McLean Associates, P.C.; H2M Group, 1988. Draft
Environmental Impact statement for North Sea Landfill.
Unpublished.
Rau, John G. and David C. Wooten, 1980. Environmental Impact
Analysis Handbook, McGraw-Hill, Inc. USA
Stanton, Donald J., 1987.
Predicted Noise Levels
Unpublished.
Acoustic Noise Measurements and
for Model 1000, Eagle Crusher.
Warren, Richard E., 1985. Noise Analysis of Sparrow Sand Mine
Site. Unpublished.
I
I
I
I
,
.
I
I
'.
I
I
f
I
~.
I
I
I.
I
I
,I
I
I
I
r
TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT STATEMENT
NORTH SEA
SANITARY LANDFILL
JUNE 1988
LOUIS K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P. C.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
IN ASSOCIATION WITH
H2M GROUP
-.---
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
used as a source of daily cover material for the active cell (Cell
II). The Town has secured a triennial mining permit from the New
York state Department of Environmental Conservation. Therefore, it
is not expected that any cultural impacts will be associated with
the proposed action.
3.2.6
Noise
This section on noise will discuss ambient noise levels at
and around the North Sea Landfill, as well as provide the reader
with more common noise sources for comparative purposes. A
discussion on decibles is also provided, as well as existing.
regulations and standards concerning noise.
Ambient Noise Levels
Existing noise in the vicinity of the project site is in the
form of vehicular traffic movements on area roadways and daily
normal operation activities at the North Sea landfill. Activities
at the landfill include vehicular movements (Le. cars, trucks,
and bucket loaders) involved in depositing, moving and compacting
of solid waste and soil cover.
Ambient noise level data were obtained in and around the
project site at specific reference points which are illustrated in
Figure 3.2.6.1. A calibrated Davis Instruments Model 886 Sound
Level Meter Type 2 was utilized for the noise measurements. The
ambient noise levels were recorded on the dB-A and dB-C sound
levels. Sound level readings were recorded on the dB-A and dB-C
50
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'.
I
I
I
~ . I ',t_rv '''.'',f-J ~
.', r- ,,~ .
". .\?' ^
-- 0 -...
,- ..'~..
. ---"" \ \ ,. '! .:.
:".':'.:-." -i . . \\ ," - /.; .............
_--;y'1."~"" A ,t'-_. ,-L_-'-1\ '1' T'.1'" _.
" ' '. < /" ' i .' '"
'! ...... ...\~ I~ \ ."-- -.' .~,
. .) .~\\./ .-ilo.- Sur/It St'Q', I ~ . '.;
:;" J; ... ,::;:\ ,H..rbor ;. ~ : ' . ')'"
. .''- .~ t .. C.-soertCe ;1 \... .........---... .....-......
· "-;1. JIotftr / ...--...........~ ....00:.........
.- '. ~ .. ~ ..."..: .........
'-'~'-'~ .... FiJM ) I\p" .
.~. ,...:( ~'1" 0" 'I ,.~; 2(J . ';:' 6 \.. _~~~ ...O.S
/ ~ 'II::' ~~rth ,~::~~!..,.. .-..~_....._~~~;. ~.-
='l!~ . .7 '
;" .....
",...,
~~ j . :
~".-..- "
=- f :
- .- ~ .1.
I. .
i..:-. t:. ;'NORTH .SEA
.\ j . :'- /LANDFILL:" .
':I.. .: !l :.... j PROPERTY.':
,Y ) f\'~~~~___':~~OUND~.~.Y
~ ~ .1 X:......, .e".-.
" ....... J : .. II... ...., .... \ . ,
i "<;.. .....
... dI....,: '~,qdl " i
J. "\ I ~ '";
.." ~ .. , .:
.... "\ "-'~:,:=::"._"" ...... .' . J\....
.. . -' ..
'. . ... .. --~.....- ..
.... X. .\ .' . ~.~. .;r-
.' :1';;';-;'" \ ..' . ~:' '.: ::.
.. .. .. J ..'.. \..
..:~ n~ .~ .. .. ,
. ,,"'." ":J~' '.-:' "~' i
.. . ..i .. '.- ... .. -.. .. ....: I :z
... #.. .~.. . . ... : ..
-....-,....a..c.. ..............,. .... ;-
,.A"""". .., ... ...~.. _ , ;....- -,.C': .. .... ....
~... . .. =:'" .~.. .... . . I. : . \ .c.
.-... . ....... 1 .... - . .
.'. I ...... . ~........ ..'" . --. .w.. --.~. ,.
."',:....~..: .~.-:.. .~. -.. ~ ....-.........-.:..
.-t: ..' .. -......M U ....
. .. 'U....~~. ... :........1 ampco. .
"'"...,:: ...._~.. . ... ..:. . .. .... ...~Park: _ .....
...' ,
-- ..
.
.
.
.'
,
- .
~' Gra..
.~ (:
,
..
.
.
.
..
. . J;'
. .
..' .
..1-.':.
, .
.. ~. ",.
~
.-
. ~;;.:---'"
:,,~ ..
SOURCE: N.Y.S.D.O.T. MAP 1981 SOUTHAMPTON QUAD.
TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON, NORTH SEA LANDFILL.
jl,II' . AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL
.... REFERENCE POINTS
LCXJIS K. McLEAN ASSOCIATES, P.c. IN ASSOCIATION WITH
SCALE: 1"= 2000'
FIGURE 3.2.6.1
I1~M
GROUP
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
scales for several reasons. First, most municipalities have sound
level regulations and standards in the dB-A scale, and second,
industrial heavy equipment is generally recorded in the dB-C
scale. The ambient noise level at the respective reference point
is provided in Table 3.4. All measurements were made
approximately three feet above ground level.
All sound level data at and around the North Sea Landfill
were recorded by H2M staff on December 28, 1987. Weather
conditions included an overcast day with temperatures at
approximately 40 degrees F. As stated previously, all ambient.
noise levels at the reference points were recorded in both the dB-
A and dB-C scales. Actual data at each reference point for each
scale were taken once every five minutes over a lS-minute time
period. A sound level range was obtained, representing the
minimum to maximum levels indicated on the sound meter at each
reference point. The ranges indicated in Table 3.5 represent the
average of three readings (in their respective scale) taken at
each reference point.
The recorded data reveal the maximum readings on both the
dB-A and dB-C scales to be of the heavy equipment at close range
(i.e.,88 dB-A, 87 dB-C). Slightly lower readings were of passing
motor vehicles (Le., 60 dB-A, 80 dB-C). The lowest readings
represented quiet ambient conditions (i.e. less than 40 dB-A, 45
dB-C) .
51
,
,
t
,.
,
,
,r
"
"
I~
11
11
II.
I(
II
II
It
I!
Reference Point
1. Southwest of the project
site in the woods at
approximately 1,000 ft.
2. East side adjacent to
Major's Path, several
hundred feet south of
the landfill's main
entrance.
3. In woods on west side
of Major's Path directly
opposite the landfill's
main entrance, at
approximately 1,000 ft.
4. Northwest corner of
proposed cell expansion
site.
5. North Sea Road, approx.
800 ft. west of its
intersection w/Major's
Path.
6. Great Hill Road, approx.
1400 ft. east of its
intersection w/Major's
Path.
7. Dirt road east of land-
fill, at approximately
1,000 ft. south of Great
Hill Road.
TABLE 3.4
AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL AT THE REFERENCE POINTS
Average Ambient Noise Level*
dB-A dB-C
Raw Data of Ambient Noise Levels
dB-A dB-C
Conditions
46-53
58-63
Heavy equipment (i.e.
bucket loaders) and their
back-up alert were heard
periodically, interspersed
wit~ woodland quiet.
48-55
46-53
43-50
59-63
60-65
55-62
46-62
48-75
45-60
45-50
Readings recorded passing
vehicles on Major's Path (no
heavy trucks).
59-77
55-80
58-65
65-85
49-57
49-55
48-57
50-58
60-67
60-80
65-75
Readings recorded vehicles
passing on Major's Path and
entering/existing landfill
as well as woodland quiet.
62-74
40-48**
57-64**
40-47 57 -6 2
40-48 58-65
40-50 57-65
86 75
88 87
40 50-53
40 50-53
40 50-53
<40 45-48
<40 45-48
<40 45-48
<40 45-47
<40 45-47
<40 45-47
Readings recorded include
heavy equipment (i.e. bucket
loaders) at approximately
40 and 100 ft.
40***
50-53
NO vehicular traffic: quiet
residential neighborhood.
<40***
45-48
No vehicular traffic: quiet
residential neighborhood.
<40***
45-47
Woodland.
* The ambient noise level at the reference point is provided for both the dB-A and the dB-C sound level scales.
utilizing a calibrated Davis Instruments Model 886 sound level meter accurate to a decibel range of 40 to 140 dB. The
numbers indicate an average of the range (minimum to maximum) of recorded sound levels at the reference point. Actual
data at each reference point was taken once every five minutes over a 15-minute time period. for a total of three
readings in the specified time frame.
**
Single noise level readings of heav,' equipment at 40 ft. not included in the average.
***
No range recorded - ambient readings did not fluctuate.
Source of North Sea sound level readings: H2M staff.
I:
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\.
I
I
TABLE 1
*CRUSHER OPERATING NOISE LEVELS. .TRENTO~,NJ
DISTANCE (FT) SIDE** NOISE. LEVEL (DB/SCALE)
AVERAGE RANGE
o (OPERATOR PLATFORM)
10
4
1
95/C
93-102/C
95/C
84-89/A
10
2
97/C
88-92/B
88-100/C
95-99/A
96-100/B
95-99/C
88-94/A
92-96/B
92-99/C
NO DATA
83-93/C
10
.,.
~,
94/C
10
4
1
2
88-95/C
50
85/C
90/C
90/C
88-95/C
50
50
3
50
4
2
NO DATA
100
83/C
81-85/C
250 (NO BERM)
2
72/C
65-74/A
65-75/Ec
70-75/C
250(1.5FT HIGH SAND BERM)
58/C
55-b1/C
2
*r'\UDEL 1400 E!~GLE CRUSHER DURING ROADWAY CONCRETE CRUSHING
UFFRATIONS.
*"'SEE FIGURE I.
~
-,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 3. 5
COMMON ACOOSTIC NOISE SOURCES AND LEVELS
AT THE RIVERHEAD LANDFILL
SOUND SOURCE
Bucket Loader,
Riverhead Landfill
SOUND LEVEL
76 dB-A
82 dB-B
85 dB-C
CONDITIONS
Measured at a distance
of 50 feet to one side
of the loader
Bucket Loader Backup
Alert, Riverhead
Landfill
~o dB-A
80 dB-C
Measured at 50 feet
Gravel Truck
50 feet to the side of
Osborn Avenue
Gravel Truck
86 dB-C
76 dB-C
Measured at road shoulder
Passenger Auto
Measured at road shoulder
Passenger Auto
Interior During
Highway Travel
72 dB-C
As reported for typical
new autos during road
tests
Source of Riverhead Readings: Mr. Donald J. Stanton, P.E.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
For comparative purposes, additional acoustic measurements
were made at and around the project site, as well as at the River-
head landfill, so as to provide some familiar sound references.
These measurements include vehicles passing a roadside vantage
point, a bucket loader at 50 feet and the backup alert from a
bucket loader. These data are provided in Table 3.5
The approximate sound levels of other, more familiar sources
in the A-weighted scale from various locations near the different
noise sources are provided below:
Typical Source
Noise Level
dB-A
Vacuum Cleaner (3 ft away)
Clothes Drier (3 ft away)
Blender (3 ft away)
Air Conditioner (3 ft away)
Jackhammer (50 ft away)
Lawn Mower (50 ft. away)
Chain Saw (50 ft. away)
Snow Blower (50 ft away)
73
63
75
58
88
72
83
85
Based upon information provided in the Environmental Impact
Analysis Handbook by John Rau and David Wooten, when a steady
outdoor noise level of 70 dB-A exists, relaxed conversational
speech is virtually impossible. Even with a raised voice, satis-
factory conversation is not possible for distances greater than
about 5 feet.
52
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I'
1
I
I
1
1
Decibels
For reference purposes, a discussion of decibels, dB, and the
measurements of same will be detailed herein.
The physical description of sound concerns its loudness as a
function of frequency. Typically, noise is composed of many fre-
quency components of various loudness distributed over the audible
frequency range. Various noise scales have been established to
describe quantita'tively the response of the average person to a
complex sound composed of various frequencies at different
loudness levels. Therefore, simplified techniques have been
developed to account for the dependence of perceived loudness upon
frequency. This is done by the use of weighting filters in noise
measuring instruments which give a direct reading of approximate
loudness.
The sound level of an object can be reported in decibels
(dB), on three different weighted scales: dB-A, dB-B, and dB-C.
Sound intensity (sound pressure) is measured relative to a
standard reference level of 0.002 microbar. A sound meter, such
as the one used to record the measurements for this report, is
equipped with the most common frequency weighting networks (scales
A, B and C) which alter the frequency response of the sound meter.
This alteration occurs in much the same manner as a stereo system
equalizer alters the frequency response of the stereo sound
system. However, in the case of the sound meter, the frequency
53
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
.
.
I
:.
.
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
response is present. The relative frequency response of each
weighted scale is illustrated in Figure 3.2.6.2. The dB-A scale
is 27 dB lower in relative frequency response than the dB-C scale.
For example, at 30 Hz the dB-C is 27 dB more sensitive than the
dB-A scale, and 10 dB more sensitive than the dB-B scale. The
essential difference between the weighted scales is that the
higher the letter scale (i.e. dB-C), the greater the low
frequency response. The response of the dB-C scale corresponds to
the response of the human ear to hear loud noise. The relatively
low frequency rumbling machinery noise, such as that produced by
heavy machinery at the landfill, is an example of loud noise. In.
effect, the dB-C scale "hears better" than the dB-A or dB-B scales
for loud noises. Thus, the dB-C scale was the predominant scale
used in collecting noise data. The dB-C scale also provides the
highest readings of the three weighted noise level in order to
rate a sound's loudness, this aids in determining the impact a
noise may have on humans.
The dB scale used provides an indication of the ratio of
sound intensity measured relative to the reference level (0.0002
microbars). This relationship can be described mathematically as
follows:
dB - 10 10910 (Measured Level)
( 0.0002 )
No formula exists to provide a direct conversion from one
scale to another.
54
-
-lilii'
---
20:': -
I : _ , '
W'O'
(/). . O' .
~ .. . .
O ....
Z, . ,.
". ....
o <'
Q. : .
(/) . :
a::: .:
lOW:::: .
>- ~ .
-.. .
.... .
c(::: .
20 a:
3
NOISE METER RESPONSE
1,000
NORTH SEA LANDFILL . FIGURE NO. 3.2.6.2
Il~M
rnf"'\1 I~
SOURCE: MR. DONALD ...
STANTON, P.E.
4 :
TOWN
.'_'-1
100
OF SOUTHAMPTON,
, . ~
. r-' . ,......
"0 . .---...-.-.. ,.r.__.'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Noise Requlations and Standards
Noise control regulations exist at the federal, state, county
and local levels. The Noise Control Act of 1.972 gives the u.s.
Environmental Protection Agency the authority to set standards for
the noise levels produced by major noise sources.
The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) general
industry standards are established only for the operator of a
piece of equipment, not the general public. A piece of equipment
may be within OSHA operator limits, but still be considered noisy
by persons at a distance from the source.
Pursuant to Title 29, Section 191.0.95 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (29 CFR 1.91.0.95), protection against the effects of
the noise exposure must be provided to equipment operators (and
others, as applicable) when sound levels exceed those illustrated
below when measured on the A-weighted decibel scale:
Duration Per Day
(hours)
Sound Level
dB-A
8
6
4
3
2
1.-1./2
1.
1./2
~ 1./4
90
92
9S
97
1.00
1.02
1.0S
1.1.0
1.1.S
5S
I
I
I
;1
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
If the daily noise exposure is composed of two or more
periods of noise exposure of different levels, their combined
effect should be considered, rather than the individual effect of
each. When employees are subjected to sound exceeding the limits
above, personal protective equipment should be provided to reduce
sound levels.
The states have the authority to control noise by licensing,
regulating or res~ricting the use, operation and movement of noise
sources and by setting maximum noise levels permitted in the
environment.
In New York state, Part 450, Noise from Heavy Motor Vehicles,
of Title 6, New York Code of Rules and Regulations (6 NYCRR Part
450) provides maximum permissible motor vehicle sound levels in
dB-A. Part 450 is applicable at any time or under any condition
of highway grade, load acceleration or deceleration. However, it
is not applicable to:
o a vehicle with a maximum gross weight of ~ 10,000 pounds
o a combination of vehicles having a maximum gross weight
of < 10,000 pounds
o warning devices (i.e., horns, sirens) and associated
vehicles.
56
I
I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I;'
I
I
I
I
I
A S111""'''ry of the maximum permissible sound level readings (in
dB-A) follows:
Distance Between Measuring
Point to Target Vehicle
(in Feet)
35-38
39-42
43-47
Range of Maximum
Sound Level
(dB-A)
89-95
88-94
87-93
48-57
58-69
70-8f
86-92
85-91
84-90
Regulations regarding maximum permissible noise levels from.
automobile and other sources not covered by Part 450 are at the
local level.
Noise standards at the local level in the Town of Southampton
are found in Chapter 47, Noise, of the Town Code. Noise standards'
are provided for use in residential and also commercial or
industrial zoning districts. No noise standards are provided for
the Open Space Conservation (OSC) zoning district in which the 6-
acre project site is located. Therefore, the data can only be
compared to the sound levels established for residential and
commercial or industrial districts. For residential districts,
all readings in dB-A, except for passing motor vehicles and inter-
mittent heavy equipment activity, are within Town standards. For
industrial or commercial districts, all readings dB-A, except for
passing motor vehicles and intermittent heavy equipment activity
57
I
I
I
I
.
.
I
.
.
I
:.
.
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
are within Town standards. It should be noted that the majority
of the North Sea landfill property is within the OSC zoning
district pursuant to the official zoning map for the Town (4th
Update: May 1986).
Noise standards for the Town are provided herein. In a resi-
dential district, no person shall create or cause to be emitted
any noise which, when measured at any lot line in a residential
district, exceeds the following standards:
(1) From 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
a) airborne sound in excess of 65 dB-A; or
b) airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in dB which exceeds the values
listed below in one (1) or more ocatve bands:
Octave Band
Center Frequency
(Hertz, Hz) in
cycles l)er sec.
Octave Band
Sound Pressure
Level (dB)
31.5
63
125
250
500
1000
2000
4000
8000
78
73
67
60
55
51
46
43
40
(2) From 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
a) airborne sound which has a sound level in
excess of fifty (SO) dB-a; or
58
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!I
I
*
I
II
I
I
I
b) airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in dB which exceeds the values
listed below in one (1) or more octave bands:
Octave Band
Center Frequency
(Hertz, Hz) in
cycles 'Per sec.
Octave Band
Sound Pressure
Level (dB)
75
70
64
57
52
49
43
40
37
31.5
63
125
250
500
1000
2000
4000
8000
In a commercial or industrial district, noise standards are
such that no person shall create or cause to be emitted any noise
which, when measured at any lot line in a commercial or industrial
district, exceeds the followinq standards:
(1) From 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.:
a) airborne noise in excess of seventy (70) dB-A: or
b) airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in decibels which exceeds the
values listed below in one (1) or more bands:
Octave Band
Center Frequency
(Hertz, Hz) in
cycles per sec.
Octave Band
Sound Pressure
Level (dB)
85
80
74
67
62
58
53
50
47
31.5
63
125
250
500
1000
2000
4000
8000
59
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(2) From 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.:
a) airborne sound which has a sound level in excess
of fifty-five (55) dB-A; or
b) airborne sound which has an octave band sound
pressure level in decibels which exceeds the
values listed below in one (1) or more octave
bands :
Octave Band
Center Frequency
(Hertz, Hz) in
cycles per sec.
Octave Band
Sound Pressure
Level (dB)
78
73
67
60
55
51
46
43
40
31.5
63
125
250
500
1000
2000
4000
8000
The provisions listed above apply to the use of occupancy of
any lot or structure thereon and to noise produced thereby except
the followinq:
o The intermittent or occasional use between 7:00 a.m.
throuqh 7:00 p.m. of homeowner's liqht residential out-
door equipment or commercial service equipment, provided
that said equipment and its use comply with the other
provisions of Chapter 47.
o Construction activities between 7:00 a.m. throuqh 7:00
p.m. and the associated use of construction devices or
to the noise produced thereby, provided that such
activities and such equipment and their use comply with
the other provisions of Chapter 47.
o Aqriculture
60
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o Noise from church bells or chimes used in conjunction
with religious services.
o Public celebrations.
o Noise of aircraft flight operations.
o The lawful operation of properly equipped motor vehicles
on any public way.
This local law does .not apply to emergency stationary and
mobile signal devices or audible exterior burglar alarms in opera-
tion for 15 minutes or less. Penalties for offenses of the local
law are a fine of not more than $250., or by imprisonment of.not
more than 15 days, or both.
~ .
61
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REPORT
ACOUSTIC NOISE MEASUREMENTS
AND
PREDICTED NOISE LEVELS
FOR
MODEL 1000, EAGLE CRUSHER
JULY 1987
F'REF'ARED BY:
DONALD J. STANTON PE
7 WHITNEY COURT
SMITHTOWN, NY 11787
PREPARED FOR:
H2M GROUP
575 BROADHOLLOW ROAD
MELVILLE, NY 11747-5076
JUl 2 4 1987
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I NTRODUCT I ON. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
DISCUSS I ON. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
CONCLUS IONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
APPEND I X A--ACOUSTI C NO I SE MEASUREMENT
AF'PEND I X B--EAGLE CRUSHER MODEL JUMBO 1000
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
FIGURE 1...............................CRUSHER MEASUREMENT SITE
FIGURE 2...................................PROJECT LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 3.................MEASURED AND EXTRAPOLATED NOISE LEVELS
FIGURE 4...........................................LAND USE MAP
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1..........................CRUSHER OPERATING NOISE LEVELS
TABLE 2............AMBIENT NOISE LEVE~S, RIVERHEAD PROJECT SITE
TABLE 3..................COMMON ACOUSTIC NOISE SOURCES & LEVELS
TABLE 4..................PROJECTED RE~ERENCE POINT NOISE LEVELS
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTRODUCTION
This report contains acoustic noise measurements made on a
concrete crusher, Model Jumbo 1400, manufactured by Eagle Crusher
Corporation. The objective of the measurement effort was
twofold:
1. To obtain an estimate of noise that might be produced in the
vicinity of the designated project site by a Model 1000
crusher
2. To determine any preferences regarding orientation of a
crusher at the project site.
Both objectives were accomplished.
EHtr-apolation of noise data obtained on a similar Eagle
Crusher indicates that noise levels in the vicinity of the
pr-oject site will be well within current noise levels Cie before
crusher installation). Regarding orientation of the Crusher at
the project site, it appears not to be an overriding factor and
that other operating considerations can be given preference
instead.
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DISCUSSION
Noise measurements were made on an operating Eagle Corp.
Model Jumbo 1400 Crusher, with muffler, during concrete crushing
operations. The Crusher is owned by Davies Bros. Corp, Howell,
NJ, and is currently being operated at Barrett Corp. facilities
in Trenton, NJ. Measurements were made at distances of 10 and 50
feet from the skin of the Crusher in three quadrants. The fourth
quadrant was inaccessible because of the presence of conveyors
and mounds of crushed product.
Additional measurements were made, as the site permitted, at
the operator station and at 100 feet and 250 feet distances away
from the operator station. The operator station has a reference
point of 0 feet, for purposes of this discussion. The 250 foot
measurement was made with a direct, clear path to the Crusher and
with a 20 foot sand berm between the observation point and the
Crusher. Measurement site geometry is shown in Figure 1.
While most measurements were made on dB scales A, Band C,
the intensity of the noise generated by the Crusher makes scale C
the most appropriate and realistic (see Appendix A). Scales A
and B diminish the effects of low frequencies (rumble type of
noise that is a significant factor during Crusher operation).
The frequency response of the sound meter for dB scales A, Band
C is provided in Appendix A. It is apparent from these scales
that the C scale is the most responsive to low frequency noise.
For example, at 30 hz the C scale is 27 dB more sensitive than
the A scale and 10 dB more $ensitive than the B scale.
2
- -,-- - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - -.- -
1- ---
I
(
I
(
I
,
SAPD
I
I@----- _~E.R.~~~
I f1~EA
NO SCALE
.- ---.
CO"'c.I~eTf:.
RIA 13llJL.E.
B
.- t5l:J f'T -
- - ---FgNSE_
--
-----.........
~
CRtl51lcD
PI~OPIAc.. T
S1bAA';e
f/UEFl
CRUSHER Mr:.ASlAREMl::fVT SII./::
tfoPPI:~
OPll f1,/lTb~
PIJlTFo!':.M
CONUe. '(fill.
A55RH IlLy
SIDI;4 A/tE"
PIESEt.
E1J<b.(J 1:
FIGlA R.E 1.
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
All measurements were made approximately 5 feet above ground
level. The New Jersey site is flat except for piles of sand,
concrete rubble, and crushed product. Fencing around the site
constrained distance measurements. Crusher noise measurement
data obtained at the New Jersey site are provided in Table 1.
Other factors noted during the measurements at the New
Jersey site were the high noise levels at the operator station,
ground tremors noticable at 100 feet and dust produced during
Crusher operation. (It should be noted that an included
sprinkler system was not functioning at the time of measurement.
The sprinkler would most likely eliminate the dust product.)
Background ambient noise measurements were made at the
proposed Riverhead Crusher site and at preselected reference
points outside the Riverhead site. Riverhead reference point
geometry is shown in Figure 2. Ambient noise levels measured are
provided in Table 2.
Additional acoustic noise measurements we~e made to provide
some familiar sound references. These measurements included
passing automobles and trucks from a roadside vantage point, a
bucket loader at 50 feet and the backup alert from a bucket
loader. Data are provided in Table 3.
4
I.
. .
I' ._
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
k>- ~\
I' /.-.. ...:. "..,
...~ A
I :~
I
I
I
I
I .'
.
Il. "'\
I
,
------ /)
/
--
-'-.-.
~
\ ,,' .' '1/, ~~.\ \
. . ~. "', '1' \
. .).~. "'::.',l:-~..' ~\
..,\.L, "
. , \...~-: .-:?: ) .'
..f' ..~. .. ..-,
.,....~ .......; ..~.
. \....) . --~~
" y
......
\.',
,
,
,-
....-/
"",
,
, ,
. ,
~.,. ,/
. ,
,
,
,
-.;
. ,
..,-
~
.--.- -
-. - -..-
,
",
----
/
~
FIGURE
~
1.
\
....
,
\
.....-\
///
/
,
,
,
......
(i)
;..,~::-..
,.;,.,
~...
'.
.
..- ....
\. ..;.:::. :..-
\/ ."_ _ /,'f"
__ ,..,.. I
.~\ ___' w'!'
'\ \,. /
>./ .
.V/.
/ ,.
\ ,.
'.l
\ h
\G
..........:-.-..r ..
--
. .
.0;.':.
.
1/'
I
///\
\ \
,>,
\
....-
"
,<:,'
/' -........ :~.....'... \
"\ .~~/
?'/ ,,\'\
\ -~, ,
\
"
\ /'
~ . \/'\
\ \ >-
,.\ \ /\\
~y~~--~ '~\'
.. ...----
0=.:..
\
o
/
/
'\"
~. .
."
,
I'~I <D (()uN" 0< ''''00<<< .:...._~
1-- ......-,- '-- . 'S - --
." '- -=::'"::..._ . .0.00 ...
- --..
LOCATION MAP
(
".\;..\ ,
~. ) ..v,\;-..__.\.
c . /.:- ---- :..
J',/ ';:0.. .' . . ~\.
/.G> y "" ,'."
" . /-'-'9\/ I \
.. .
" .
\ .. ..- :--.-
../ i" ..' '.=::::, \
.. ,.- ..
~': .'
" ~ /
. .-y
'.
'.
\ \
=~.=.... \,.~= \\
'\
\\
\". ....-
'~
:-.
.
~'-
.---- ..,
.. - -..-.
,-
"
\
\
\
\ ...../
" \ /
. v'
.'- \\/ .
flZ"
\./ .. . ~
~~..:_. \ .
..~:'-. .\......
'."::--.. I.,. \ ".
; .: . ::<-...~: ) (--.:.:
, / .... .~\~.
\ . '\ .../~
\ ....... .... ~ ,
\ .. .: .
~ \/ .
,.
~. . ....0\..
... ,/... .
-, .:_< -~,
.it..
'\ :.......\\..
,'.
. ,
\ \
, ....-.....
\....... ..-'"
\,..............
-'Y' <!. .~\.
\. ' >~:"
./.... ....\ - l. ......
.. .....\ <(.. "",,'-~-.."
'.. ,;..' '......- \
~..
.... ... -:-.: \
" ,
, "
.. '.\ ...-
.. " \:..~....
'.'
-.
..'
.'
"':
..: r.
o
\
'.
HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P.C.
,;oUSUl 1""0 ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMEN1Al SCIENTISTS. ARCHITECTS.no "L.,ANNEnS
_fl"'U.l."T
, a"""NC"oflAllf ...
n....rn.....n... ..
,....'..10 NJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2
AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS. RIVERHEAD PROJECT SITE
REFERENCE 'POINT* NOISE. LEVEL (DB/SCALE)
(RIVERHEAD LANDFILL GENERATOR AT 60 FT)
1 65/A
72/B
76/C
(BUCKET LOADER AT TOWN LANDFILL)
2
76/A
82/B
85/C
(DOG GATE, YOUNGS AVE.)
.;,
63/A
70/B
76/C
(ATOP BERM, NO SITE ACTIVITY)
4 62/A
67/B
72/C
5 62/A
67/B
72/C
(NO TRAFFIC ON OSBORN AVE. )
6,7 40/A
45/8
50/C
*SI:E FIGURE 2 LOCI\TION MI\P, FOR REFERENCE POINT LOCATIONS
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
,-
I
I
TABLE 3
COMMON ACOUSTIC. NOISE SOURCES llc LEVELS
SOUND. SOURCE
SOUND LEVEL
(DB/SCALE)
COND IT IONS
BUCKET LOADER
76/A
82/B
85/C
MEASURED AT A DISTANCE
OF 50 FT TO ONE SIDE OF
THE LOADER.
BUCKER LOADER BACKUP ALERT 90/A
MEASURED AT 50 FT
GRAVEL TRUCK 80/C
50 FT TO THE SIDE OF
OSBORN AVE.
GRAVEL TRUCK 86/C
MEASURED AT ROAD
SHOULDER
PASSENGER AUTO 76/C
MEASURED AT ROAD
SHOULDER
PASSENGER AUTO 72/C
INTERIOR DURING HWY TRAVEL
AS REPORTED FOR TYPICAL
NEW AUTOS DURING ROAD
TESTS
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONCLUSIONS
Sufficient data were obtained to assess:
1. Probable noise levels that will be produced by the proposed
Crusher at reference locations for the Riverhead site.
2. The noise reduction effect of the berms at the Riverhead
site.
3. The preferred orientation of a crusher at the
Riverhead site.
A plot of the data taken along reference lines A and B, as
indicated in Figure 1, is illustrated in Figure 3. These data
are used to estimate the noise levels that can be expected at
reference points 1 through 7 (shown on Figure 2 Location Map).
E:'.trapolation along reference line A provides an estimate of
noise levels in the absence of a berm. Differential measurements
made along reference lines A and B at a distance of 250 feet are
used to estimate the noise shielding effect of the berm. Note
the sand berm located between the noise measurement site and the
Crusher along reference line B in Figure 1. The measured
shielding effect of the berm was 14 db, however the actual
shielding effect of the berm is believed to be greater than this
amount, but residual background noise behind the berm prevented
accurate measurement of the shielding effect beyond 14 db.
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/to
100
'10
T
t -
1 \l
\
. -
- P~"'~Vf.l..
MEMl.tt\E..D DATA 1- AVG- ~ITEl.
_ I"IINII'I1411l ~11E1.
E:HAA (lol./tTlo/ll - - · - - -
NOt5E.
bO
U; VE L.
(.oS)
10-
-
...
. --
V'1T"Ho~T
- _ /'-"'" BE RI"'\
--
-
--
....-
....
bD
T
.,
1 '"
.....
SE~M
~E. SHI"i.DtIJ~
e FF 6c. T - t<iJ>!
....
-
'. ....
So
-
5-----
WITH a~R.1"\ - - - .
40,
o
'UX>
~oo
600
8ro
1000
RADIAL j)ISTANCE - FT
MEASL-tREJ> f EXTRflPOLATE]) NOISE. L-F-l.lcLS
FIGuF.E :3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
Based on these ~esults Table 4 p~ovides an estimate of
expected ave~age noise levels at the Rive~head site. Included
with these estimates a~e the noise levels measu~ed at the
Rive~head site with no machine~y ope~ating at the Suffolk Cement
Recycling facility. A positive diffe~ential between the current
measu~ements in the vicinity of the Riverhead p~oject site and
the p~ojected noise levels with the C~usher ope~ating are an
indication that noise f~om the C~usher may be perceptible.
Howeve~ note that all differentials a~e negative e>,cept at
refe~ence point 6. Therefore, even if perceptible, the levels at
~efe~ence point 6 a~e significantly less than normal street
noise, such as passing t~affic. A differential of 0 dB indicated
that the estimated noise from the Crusher will be equal to the
present backg~ound noise. A negative differential indicates that
noise f~om the C~ushe~ will be less than the p~esent background
noise at the measu~ement point.
Reference to the measu~ements made at the Trenton, NJ site
in th~ee quad~ants shows a maximum diffe~ence of +7 dB in
sustained noise measu~edopposite the engine ventilato~ of the
C~ushe~. Opposite ends of the C~ushe~ each p~oduced
app~oKimately the same sustained noise levels, with the end
containing the hoppe~ producing highe~ peak rumble noises due to
conc~ete mate~ial shifting and making contact with the hopper
sidewalls during the crushing ope~ations.
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I-
.
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
TABLE 4
PROJECTED REFERENCE POINT::NOISE LEVELS
APPROXIMATE
DISTANCE (FT)
REFERENCE FROM PROPOSED
POINT CRUSHER LOCATION
DIFFERENTIAL*
<DB)
AVERAGE NOISE
LEVEL
PROJECTED** PRESENT***
1 450 53 DB/C 76 DB/C -23
LANDFILL GENERATOR
2 750 48 DB/C 85 DB/C -37
BUCKET LOADER
3 450 53 DB/C 76 DB/C -23
4 300 57 DB/C 72 DB/C -15
5 550 51 DB/C 72 DB/C -21
6 600 50 DB/C 50 DB/C 0
7 750 48 DB/C 50 DB/C -2
* AVG. PROJECTED CRUSHER NOISE MINUS PRESENT AMBIENTIBACKGROUND NOISE LEVELc-
** CRUSHER NOISE ONLY.
*** RECORDED NOISE LEVELS.
12
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
The land use map (Figure 4) shows residential land usage
both north and south of the Rive~head project site, along Osborn
Avenue. Riverhead Town landfill the site of a generator, and
where trash dumping and earthmoving operations are ongoing,
occupies the parcel west of the project site. This suggests that
from a noise standpoint, the Crusher, if installed at the project
site, be oriented with the long dimension approximately N-S with
the engine vent facing West. As the differential noise levels
from the Crusher are not significantly different, and given the
presence of at least 35 foot hign earth berms and a somewhat
baffled entry to the base of the sand pit at the project site
where the Crusher is to be located, orientation is not
sufficiently critical to override other site operation
considerations. These considerations include location of
unprocessed concrete rubble, location of processed product,
maneuver space for loading the hopper, space for any conveyor
system that will be needed and, finally, access to and from the
site.
Summarizing, measured and extrapolated data indicate that a
Jumbo 1000 Crusher installed at the Riverhead project site will
contribute less noise than current ambient noise levels, as
measured at selected reference locations. These results indicate
that it is unlikely that noise generated by the Crusher will be
perceptible outside the grounds of Suffolk Cement project site.
Regarding orientation of the Crusher in the excavated site
at the project site, while a North-South orientation of the long
axis of the Crusher may ~e preferable, the data indicate that it
is not necessary.
13
~
Vl' . . ~
, 'I "'j. ';ll'. ,: (;
": ,,' - '.l ", ,,"
. ll'-~. . {'....'t.'
.F- ,,).:-'I't~. I/r,....
........ t'i"l'. ..
~_~ ....'.'(it',.o,
. '(l'.,.l ~.;' . .' J
.., .."\.......\.'
I i/~'. .' I '.:. ";(7
/. '. I & ( )."
~ . ~: .",' 'f . I ~ '-.. .' r~ r.. t'~_c~~ r.:G'
(~ ~,~ -, '~ . . '" I' ,. '.
;) -''''...~''' ' . \ (,"G) ~{",,". _.....
I. ...."IIlr.~ ',' ',' .. ('\
q' .:.':' c.~ t\"'~"~ r/~) (....,., CJ n:.':. "
t... . \") - '.. . ,... t. II"
.....t,.~)~~...'..11;; , .11., o'.r.'!/'.
1,-- ~t" <) 0" '."Li .':. )I,if'
.. ... n.. ',r ,,~ 1"".
~"l '(..,..' I'" ' . (,1\
t ": ,'.' (,J',,' ,01'''' ...."
,. (... ; ~ 0,' (, 4'"
I....,.:..J 1\' t} C:,'i" f(,"ft' ..'
'.:'\....0 . ".. ~.. ..~. . \
.!;'I",e-,-,. ~",'f..'{~.~'r~ C"':;to' ..
"'''':''j(~'''~'~' I~Y'(,\'\~,\l'-'~~"~I~i.. / .
.; " ' I." "''', -..... ~ ,~ ., .1. (,:\ ,'.a ~ /' . .
{....:;}I,.';'~.c~lJl . r"(.',r,'r'S.{.l,.{.U, \ \\' ;i\
cO ~V,'jJ .J 0.','. . r'''' {j 1':,' \~f I;' 14' ,.'J (U , .....,. .
.1/ ,J t:"I ....,,'., .. "r.\ I" 'q.' ,. .1 I'" .. .:..
,. '. : C.""... IJ , ., .':1-.",..1'......, '. 1..'\' "., .,
.. .(, r"JI.. r. ",,!)O r,,., .,....,.,,.. .f \1 'i' .,,\." \' '\ "
~ I~'~" ''';.;i'.:-.'' :..'~. .... 5"" ': U:' . r.. ~'I"r: ,'. ".'. . ,. '. ,~.I
..~.,.,..;,~'tr;',ll" .....,..1/ ,'I}.....,...(.(I...... ',(,1,)' ;\.., .n.(.'.
'.....0'.. ",.. "or t;'.I'.....I. l,' , ....... , .....";.. . .\'\ ,.. .:'.,,'1
.;O..,'"01',,..,...."'..,....W71 .\,,,<.,,.\~ \.'J (., "I~Y~' \..,{.\\'"C\\~'
.,., . " n""4 ~ .." " IJ ""t II' - . . I" V >>
.ill";.,Jt.t'.~ f..t. ~''''I' ~ ......'"... ..,,..
", " ':.'\ ..',:-... u ......\ ,C c .'r-:.. fJ.<., , ",., 11'.'1' "': r
.'..",,':\ \:. , ;;, . ...,' {.:".",.. /r..... t,'", f . " ,;t"t 1....:. ..\~;
:' I.:"~?~.: fit (....~".(;:..."i;~{...(.l~' ,i".Jt:: f}'\'('~(,(,"~
.:'. 6 f'''', .:.r...(''''....nr..''...~ ('~(...":,I'l,).I~..C,,41I'~'
- ',') " .....1...... t.' f",1 "r' ,.,.1 . y..... . ,. ..
. .... ~f.' ...~h..' ,..r,. ".. ,'ll'l""'<<"';~ ''''\1111..
!\ ,.,...t' :,<:..~-, .,C."....(.\ {..!..~ "C...:...I, .("..:' to
..,.1 ..1!i(l"'~ C) ..~.,.(..' !Iell.} ~',...c}'" \.
,. .....,...... . ...n .,. ..... I"
. (,I t.... ." c: ('~ (, ';\'r',.I."(." ,'" ..." "/
'.~' ...... "'41';'" . ':'1 I '0# . ..,,' C\ ., .-tl {." '..1 ," .
..~ f..(. ......) 'f''' l.1!\'" .\".. ,,,. ", e,f,
l""}'r:' "I ~.. ~\"'c:J'~; " t:) (.'!\ .~ " ,],. .I',..r....'\, ... '.,
l~,~frh~~ .~',I: '1, "'p'.'., :"'4'~" ':~:If\.'" ;:"'(', t) f,\Q(::.!
(~VI/~,'r" "'(1 J.;'l'{' a..."l.......' .....
':~."..,,~~)' . I':r;, f;' (..(.. .......C....!l. ....".,.:f..1J:,:..'L
'1/"'':;,'.' ~oJ" ;t/~' ('\ ....(i'.......i'.!a' ,.I:;.I':;".:t.
liif.r"Q/'/{, 'i'" ....C.. . ,n ('"$'_.'''
-If' ~ \1" *.,' ,r\ '~\.l', . '.' ~1l_...' c' '.' ..~ ;,,'.,\ .,.... t~
,J .\.. C' U "\ 0 l"'r..,.' ,'" ., ~.. .'- ... ., .
. ...... t~' ,n '" s' ..~. I) C""" ;\. ...: ,,) ;,....1 .
"t "l .'} ~ ('\ ,lil(! (.' .' "(' (. ..I n.(."\ t:' .~1,. ,,'.
d!.OJI r...'\...,.;...O'; \.4,.' '....., .,t'...:),..~1 _'.. ."...),....,.
, ..... '0""( ..-.,'. A\t'" ...~ t' ..I.' '1'" '.\ .... ,
~fJ, ....... ..II1l'.It.,....,.~..t'U.".~.~ :'\'':.''J~",''.:''''l
,,"~..."~ c:; ~:.,;'C;)".:t' {\"r' .,) \(,., ~.' (~..;. ~.".."......~:
-f" ,..,..,..J.t;.c,......,.-;.:\'l.>>-:.p t:rJ. ...,' .,' \.:.\,,~".. lo'':V l"l:
,.'J'n~\c..'I{.. ...,.,.. :0" ." \. . . ~"i., 'l'1.)(\;..;),,(
.' ,"-:-"~':.,,:C;.~i~'\J',r;{~ ~"'I' ,..,...:,: "': .,..:'" ~)'::\. ~'~,'."'~:3,
'" o:Il'....~-,r.,I.., ...... ,\",~"...."..~, .J., ...
. ... ". 'i f.... 't' . "a (, ~ ...,' ...,' (... ., .' 'l'
.... .... I'" .. '.\':....1 'e,' ... oJ. ... (. .,,, .., ".," ." I J''', ..' '. .
." ..." oJ $' c'~ ,1" . . .. ..,' ..... ~ :., n" r~,.
.' . C' ..j" '" """ (..' ,~..., .:. ..., 'I....... " C"'
. .11'.. ,.",e\ '\0.. ." .' ...,........\ .....e'\f-...
..I" ..' ;.~., .' . (f c~ \' .......') . ~ . . ..\" .." ~ .,' "~' ...,' ""..',........ .' ('
.,' : G (,' "',' .. ..,'" -" ,,~ ~ . . ':'''"\~' ~,.
.....: .; ..,' ".. -," 'l. . ...,.........: ...t' '1'" ......... ,...; ,,: 'i ...,:~...)!1..
f ..',' "~"..,.,:o, ..,,' ... "..,.' '');' ;,h n'"
".," '.. , .
...,.... ..,~ .,,'" ,,'" .. ..,.' .. .. ~"'.. I' .., ..:
. ..,~ ... ..,,' ... .,.' , ...: ..t','1 -.;;..-., .'
..... .'1.:\ .... . ......
,"'''.f ..," ,I" : -I~~_ ,..' "1'''. o:~
~ .,... ..~,.. ",. . it It ..... iZ' .. . \. .ZJ""'4 ':')"
,,'Ii /"' .,0:' ~ '1': .. .j. "fl' .'1" ,...' .".. ,...... ...,.... ..,>: .~"I"':O c
. ~ ..1\';' " ,f .. ...,,~ .. ~"''':. .. "1': . .': ,'" Co';'" 0"',/:
\~"'_'l... "',:'7"'\~' .'1 '1.:' ..,~:...:' .. ..~'Ii " """'1'" .".....~...~v::~"...~...l~?
\ ,.... -: ..".' ;r.:' .... !5" .,'.. ~- . ~. \. 'I'" I
, ~ .\ .,,'.' . , .," .'I~ .. .. c.", c.:.......... 4f,
.~. .,'._.' .,,, .: 1.t . ...., 'll .."'" c..
.," ..' ""... - ,'. '1 '~Il .,,' .,'" ...,....,.... ;':~".oj . . f".. C'" r..
., ,~t\, 'I'{ .~...... ..e.. ,,"'l~ ..... ..O() ...~.
~~'-lI": . ..,.: .. ,,\ "~ 'I -j' .,,'.. tile "J ,.,....... .... ("",.,It.
: ..,\"'\,. -.:," ,,~' .. .,,' It.. "".(1:')'t : t....", ,~;.' '" ~.. IC:' of I.;;.~'
,.!~j..I.". ":~~~ ". .,' .."" "~"I'" . t:::i': .,,~' ............t.' ""''':1'I'.h'~''.::'.:'...!t ........ ~:\.....
~. . .".' .' ...... ~"",''''",. - .... .'1.....
O' {.... .',.,-V ."'......: .,.: .' ..,.' ..,.; ",-f("'lt .,,':",\......jt~ "';\\\"':'''~~<:;'.~r\\ ~~
~Q'I' ~.:-<." ., ..'''.; .' .,,:.,\. ." ,('I.. . :~I" ...,!.n.. It .......",i.. ....,
,.., ""'''': .," .;Jf..'...Jr..J..'lJ:.J...f,......,").)~.:,..'':''tr...:(.
" \'" ... .. -.,. .'" .'. 'J'" \: . ...,~ ""<"" '\ I, ,
. ....... ... 'l~ ..0: ".:. "...., ~.('....\ "',;~,:':...I(. ~ "~'r, fl' (':a t~:
. '. 0!.... ~"':,..~ .tJ("...'...~1J.{L\; c~'.\",.(.,.!..;:
"'''. ,1:...Jh:.';uJv.t.:,."~.,.IIV.."o:[jO ~'cj..a('j"~"
. . "J 'J \,Ii ~"') ',' C"i'" . .'" I'[J \0 .:J t. n .1 .' ." ' "1'
, ,'~'.".,.:....I' \.:.,\~:,c.....U"I' (\...,.J~...)'..rj'\.(.\.,C\t;...,1
\, /1.'1 ..1"" ".,;,,;,lo I~ \.' ~ ,(' 1 "tp.}' . ~ .
I ......al +'c' \," ....11 r ~,....IJ,'.' ,',~'" 1;\"
. 1 (\ ......0;;,1". \, "'. .. (' ~ I "J \.. n " .\" rw< "I I' 'J'" 'o,
;,I.... ,.~ 'I ";;J- It ".1 . "t." .. ..."" ". ... I . tl
.'J .:J.~..' .'J.'~ "".(1 '.. \l,i ~.. ,. " ,".1..~\' \.
Ir"., 1"\"') ~"~l ~(j.~ ..c."..... ...'~I(.t "{I"ef.'
,;...t for"" ...... "I" f'J"; .' "oJ' el')" ("" ..
c.\. .....,:.:,. ,'~(:4";.".,J J.',~. 1'Jt'j"'~:) ()' .,'..' t;\\ ~.lla''''''
r",).....~:,..:~.t'. ...,.._."...~..v..; . :'}I'..~...\~(J..\Q,..'.]"
,.. ,."'v' t, I" "10;,1.... """ "".1 ~. (J,~..., t. ",.(,,1.
-",. (' ...~.. '1 "" . 'j' .' ..' ,1 ,.. .'
'..;,0. (> t;.......".J. ..' .... ..1':'.... ~,"'.;l 4,) ..
"~,..~ \,~:) \f~,:.,;j ''':"'If}tV:~''' {tP~7"'fJ..:
.,'.~.'il.!'''.lh.''..:>:',~~.'. '.\'''[1 \1'~"(,,~ r.~eJ/
. ~..., ')1 . ~!.~(I . ./L ., I",J c:..
co". . . .... . .. 1'\" ". .' .
''':. r;... . t~~.. ,. t ' ... d1 \.1 (',.' {.\~
>,.., -.I",. ...... ..':'tv tl~1 ) ;2\1........ C...\
4'" I) 1...\) \".. ~ .:." '1"'" <:.1. .' (.,', I....:. (\".,."
1"''' C' ,\' fa "r'i :0," I' . i\ r\.
...,I).Ir. .\t:'(.l'(.'("~'(. i4 ~.,. )Ir.,"\
))j,...r~ t" ..... "0 ~('t.'O 't.' ~'\""'c" (,',}':t C~\~;.;~;.~~, /..#'
\ i' c' V .,.>\~....' U i,' rJ..{','" ,,",,; \.."1.:. t'~"II"'~'?'
<l" .I II ,," .... Iof' . .
.' .;'il':.t-:"~J(,!."O '1~''\'''']'':(''~(i''Io.''/
.~ t: I' .:.... ()..'\. ". "',' .. 'J...',
f."' :h{. Qt1.., U... ,)"
~,. ".,
'~!
. >
I~J~
.<
,.j~"c
~l:;
Jo :I e ~
..s':'s
.....:::..
I..: ...
.-
'"
Offi
, %
a,%
~
.C,
..J"
..J ~
II.I~
a:u
a:;'
~0
:E~
iii
05;
~
Zi:,
Ou
O~
Z;!
ILl"
.Ji
1.15
,J: ~
.%
a:~
ILlffi
::t~
0<;
~~
:E'f
N-
..J::
o'Q
::t8
~
,-
.
..
-
i
u
.
~
c
!
-
. "
j .
~ "
_ 0
. 0
Ci .
R
.'
!
-
C
.
I 7;1
I.
_.
. ~
...-
.
-.---
_..-
..w
-
,
-
-
-
-
.
....J_
'..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
ACOUSTIC NOISE MEASUREMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
~.
I
I
Sound intensity (sound pressure) is measured relative to a
standard reference level of 0.0002 microbar. The instruments
used are equipped with weighting networks, corresponding to
scales A, B, and C, that alter the frequency response of the
sound meter in much the same manner as a stereo system equalizer
alters the frequency response of the stereo sound system. In the
case of the sound meter however the frequency response is preset.
The relative response on each scale is shown in Figure A-1. The
essential difference is that the higher the letter scale the
greater the low frequency response. In addition, the response of
scale C corresponds to the response of the human ear to loud
noise, thus it was the predominant scale used in collecting
Crusher noise data. Scale C also provides the highest readings
of the three scales, allowing for a margin of error.
80th 8 ~ K and General Radio measurement equipment was
available for use. It proved most appropriate to use a
calibrated General Radio model 1555-A Sound Survey Meter for
these measLlrements because of its portabi 1 i ty.
The dB scale used provides an indication of the ratio of
sound i ntensi t y measured, rel at i ve to the ref erence level ((1.0002
microbarl. The form of the relationship is
Measured Level
Reference Level
dB = 10 10&10
I
~
I
I
I
I c
....
It':
I <:'
'"
I
I
I-
I
I
I -
<-
I ;~
'-
, -
I ,..
.......
v
-
I
I
I
I
c-.
8
o~
E
// ~
E- -<
/ -a
----:---=-~. 41-----.:-~~
. ,~
------------------.
-. .~
-..u
_._----:-'-.--:------~-:--=---- -
<
.-j
t
~
----
. -
II.:
~
::s
(!)
u.
-..
-,
...-'
.......
.lu
--VJ----...-
c
<:
o
_..____ 0
o
,..
t
,
~.~.~ ---- ~~, 1~ -
- ~. ,::,:-'-:1 \
:.':' .-::t ; .
.:~.: - -:a ~
;.--': .:.:..=--'-'-'~';-.:.c~~~'-'-~:..z:o::,;.~ A -.-.-=-.:::...::.~__~.2:__2_.:_.:...:.~;~.:.:..::.:..., .__
~~- . .'. .... ..-==~1~~q~-'~:.--~----- "~
--:-':"::'n- .:-..~ . ,
. .-.... ~
- ---------
: - :- .. -". '!..
-- _ - 1 . "\
. l-,.----'~-----
'-4 -----~-.---:';:....--------- ------
1:'
I
'-
=
~
,
-
...
_.
i_
~----
~
"-
.
"
\.
.-.",', \.
~.., ",
-------- -----------
-- --- ~. - ._---=.;:~~-~--- -...":,.
~~ ."-----.- --- ': ...~-_._-~._-_.~-
- "- ~~---_.~------ ..... "---
-_._----------....;....~--- _"'\. - -_.''"'-. -----
\ m-, <C'-
.u ,-'" '- '_~
- "'\----x-.. -
.~ u_ -. :.,,----;.~--- -~:----...;...~ ~.--:_. r"'>
---- -- - -- ----..- . ----.-. --~_..."..
o
'--0
t
,
. ..
---.-.----..
"
--.
.- . .- -
--.----------
-- -- ----.--- ----
.,. -.---
~
-----.-. ---.------- ----.--.-----------
-
'SC!.=--==_S" ,-y C' r{~ 3~ ~ Ii LJ,..':of /3 C.I_._:,":.~.
o c 0 c C
N ~ N
+. ; I
J:>
-0:::-
I
o
'"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The
Crushing & Screening Plant
JUMBO 1000-DELPHI
4 Different Products...AII at Once!
, FIELD PROVEN... ON THE JOB!
}
. 4 Dlfterent Products - 3 in closed-circuit and a 4th in open-circuit.
. Field Proven-2DO-250 TPH (high-silica limestone, gravel, traprock, as well as recycled
asphalt & concrete~ .
. Elclusive "Counter-Shaft" Arrangement-maximizes efticiency of diesel engine...
RPM's remain constant, as speed of crusher is adjusted to job.
. No Field Assembly - simply block & crush.
FEATURES
. Crusher-33.000 lb., 3-stage. hi-chrome or alloy steel. fixed blow bar impact crusher.
. Feed Hopper-wl16 ft. vibrating grizzly feeder.
. Screen-5 ft. x 16 ft. double-deck. vibrating screen.
. Closed-Circuit Operation - retum conveyor. standard.
. Side Delivery Conveyors - all fold easily for travel.
For further information or to see our plants in full
operation in the Reid, on video tape. .. Write or Call:
(800) 25 EAGLE or (800) 83 EAGLE [Ohio]
TELEX: 987433
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
JUMBO 1000
. . . THREE-IN-ONE PLANT
Field Report: #12
. ... ,- .' -_.:~ "':-..~:"'~ . ~:~-:~.
"'It. ........:r. . -" . ..... .... .~.~::(~"""'...~~":
!; .. ... "! .;.. i,...t... ," '':,\:,~ ..~. +.'." ::~- .:_;""-~= ~'''~~~'.'' ,".
._~... _.,_.....--": .."'.~~_-=- ...A:'~.~
Now. . . in Delphi, Indiana
}
" TYPICAL FEED SIZE: .
14" CHUNKS OF HARD
DOLOMITE LIMESTONE
(THIS MACHINE HAS EASILY
HANDLED UP TO 32" SLABS
WITH NO DIFFICULTY.)
DISCHARGE: HIGHLY .
UNIFORM MINUS 1%" ".
PRODUCT PRODUCED
AT 200 TPH.
EAGLE
CBtJtIlR1llR COMPANY. INC.
4250 S.R. 309 . GAllON, OHIO 44833
"Nell' Ideas" " . From a Century of Experience"
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I:,
I
1
1
1
I
I
1
c
I
I
Field Report: DELPHI, INDIANA
JUMBO 1000. . . THREE;'/N-ONE PLANT
r
I ;.,
-
1
Job Specifications
Material: Limestone
Material Characteristics: Medium Hard & Abrasive
Feed SiZe: 24" x 0"
Discharge Product: Minus 1Y:z"+ Minus 7/8" x 0"
Capacity: 200 TPH
Plant Specifications
. Travel Height: 13' 6"
Qperating Height: 13' 6"
Weight: 87,500 Ibs.
Power Supply: Diesel (325 hp.)
Hopper Opening Size: 16'
Vibrating Feeder Size: 40" x 15'
Crusher Size: RC 10 (44" x 42")
Crusher Feed Opening: 42" x 31"
Discharge System: 42" to
DO Screen
Generator: 100 Kw
Tires: 12-10:00 x 20
Screen Size: 5' x 16'
Special Features
. Products - Makes 3 different products, ,. simultaneously, , , in closed circuit with absolute sizing,
and a 4th product in open-circuit.
. No Field Assembly Required - Simply block and crush.
. Side Conveyors - Fold for travel.
For a copy of our color Recycling Brochure. . . and to see
our plants in full operation in the field, on video tape:
Call Toll Free:'(800) 25 EAGLE or (800) 83 EAGLE (Ohio)
4250 S.R. 309 . GAllON, OHIO 44833
"New Ideas, From a Century of Experience"
CRtJRR"II!I\ COMPANY. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
NOISE ANALYSIS OF SPARROW SAND MINE SITE
situate
South Street, Manorville, Town of Brookhaven, New York
I
I
*
*
*
*
*
* *
*
*
*
*
Prepared For:
I
Mr. Randolph Silverstein
Sparrow Mining Company
3743 White Plains Road
Bronx, New York 10467
I
I
Prepared ~
I
I
I
I
I
Richard E. Warren, Director
Thomas A. Panasci, Assistant Planner
Inter-Science Research Associates, Inc.
Planning & Development Consultants
Butter Lane Corner, P.O. Box 897
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
Date Prepared:
May1,1985
I
i
.~
t'.i
-I
-:.;
Ii
INTER::5CIENCE
I
I
I
I
I
NOISE ANALYSIS OF SPARROW SAND MINE
situate
South Road, Manorville, Town of Brookhaven, New York
,
Prepared For:
I
I
Mr. Randolph Silverstein
Sparrow Mining Company
3743 White Plains Road
Bronx, New York 10467
Prepared ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Richard E. Warren, Director
Inter-Science Research Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
The following presents noise data recorded on 16 April, 29
April and 30 April 1985 by Inter-Science Research Associates,
Inc. from the Sparrow Sand Mine property located along the
southerly side of South Road, Manorville, and within the
surrounding neighborhoods.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
SUM~lARY :
During April 1985, the staff of Inter-Science Research
Associates, Inc. recorded noise levels throughout the Sparrow
Sand Mine property and in the adjacent surrounding neighborhoods,
in an effort to ascertain whether the existing sand mining
operation exceeds the limits established in-Chapter 50 of the
Code of the Town of Brookhaven, entitled "Noise Control".
Measurements were taken at a variety of locations, in order to
determine the impacts of the operation of the sand mine on the
surrounding properties. Locations sampled included:
o Intersection of South Road and Wading River Road;
o One-half way between intersection of South Road
and Wading River Road, and Sparrow Sand Mine site;
I
o
Wading River Road and the entrance to the Sparrow
Sand Mine property;
I
I
I
o
Along top edge of mining pit, within the Sparrow
Sand Mine property;
o
At bottom of sand mining pit, approximately 100'
from sand screening operation;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
At bottom of pit, approximately 15' from front-end
loader dropping large rocks into dump truck;
o
At bottom of pit, approximately 20' from front-end
loader dropping sand into dump truck;
o
0.2 miles west of entrance of Sparrow Sand Mine,
along South Road;
o
Intersection of Dayton Avenue and South Road;
o Within Pine Hills Country Club, northern section,
nearest Sparrow Sand Mine property.
Noise measurements were taken on April 16, 1985 between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., utilizing a Metrosonics db 307
Noise Dosimeter with a wind screen. All measurements were
recorded as A-weighted sound pressure levels for the various
locations from various sources. Similar readings were also
recorded on 29-30 April 1985, to obtain ambient noise levels for
the property when no machinery was operating, and for noise level
readings for the periphery of the site.
The acoustical computations performed by the Metrosonics db
307 measures the A-weighted sound level with Slow response.
The detector output is sampled at a rate of 8 samples per second.
Data recorded in the field included Average Sound Level ( Lavg)
and Maximum Sound Level (Lmax) over varying time periods.
The Noise Control ordinance of the Town of Brookhaven
requires that the noise limits for industrial uses be below the
following levels:
Maximum Permissible
Level, in dBA
Residential Property:
7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. 65 dBA
10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m. 50 dBA
Commercial Property (all times) : 65 dBA
Industrial Property ( all times) : 75 dBA
Readings were taken approximately 150' from noise sources on
the site (when possible), and also along the property lines to
determine the noise levels crossing onto adjacent property. In
addition, standard noise readings were also recorded along rural
roadways within Bridgehampton, New York to assess the noise
levels of passing passenger vehicles and other types of trucks.
This data is also presented below.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
2
I
I
FINDINGS:
I
(NOTE: Noise level readings were taken from a number of
locations within and around the periphery of the sand mine
site. Readings were taken over 10 minute intervals, using
A-weighted measuring. The results are as follows:
I
I
1. Ambient Levels: The ambient levels recorded on the
property were taken at 5:00 p.m. on 29 April 1985. Readings were
taken in the northern central portion of the property and at the
bottom of the sand mining pit. At both locations, readings were
recorded at 45.0 dBA with no mining, sorting or loading activity.
I
I
2. Noise Levels Around Periphery of Site During Operation:
The field data recorded for the noise analysis indicated that in
all cases, the sound pressure levels recorded around the
periphery of the property did not exceed the requirements of the
Noise Control Ordinance. A-weighted averages found the following
sound levels recorded for the various locations around the
periphery of the property:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NOISE LEVELS RECORDED ~ APRIL, 30 APRIL 1985:
Intersection South Road & Wading River Rd:
49.3 dBA
Entrance to the Sparrow Sand Mine:
45.0 dBA
Property border with Pine Hills Country
Club (east) adjacent to sand mine area:
45.0 dBA
Westerly Property Boundary Line:
45.0 dBA
In all cases, the noise levels recorded along the periphery
of the property were within the permitted limits as per the Noise
Control Ordinance of the Town of Brookhaven.
3. Noise Levels On-Site (within Mine) During Operation:
Readings were also taken within the sand mining pit and along the
access roadway leading to the bottom of the mine, to determine
the overall noise levels occurring on-site. Readings were taken
within 150 - 200 feet of noise sources, where possible. Findings
are as follo;ls:
NOISE LEVELS ON-SITE DURING OPERATION - 16 APRIL 1985
AND 30 APRIL 1985:
I
Lip of Sand Mine, Inside Property:
45.8 dBA
I
I
I
Bottom of Sand Pit, Front End Loader
loading sand into waiting dump truck:
50.4 dBA
Truck loaded with sand leaving pit up
access roadway within pit:
79.5 dBA
3
I
I
Sand Grading Operation (150' from
sand and gravel sorter):
45.0 dBA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sand Truck waiting (Dieseling):
52.0 - 54.0 dBA
During instantaneous periods in the bottom of the sand
mining pit (approximately 60' below the surrounding property
grade), noise levels did exceed the maximum levels of 75 dBA:
(1) during periods of loading rocks in to empty dump truck, and
(2) 40 ton dump truck accelerating up the hill that leads from
the bottom of the sand mine to the top. Levels recorded include:
Bottom of Pit, tractor loading rocks
into waiting truck:
79.2 dBA*
Bottom of Pit, sand and gravel sorter
(measured 50' away):
84.9 dBA
*measured while dropping rocks into empty truck.
I
The lip of the mine acts as an "amphitheater", and directs
the noise levels upward, rather than towards the adjacent
properties surrounding the mine. Therefore, the noise levels
recorded along the perimeter of the site all were less than that
found within the mine pit itself. Again, all recordings taken
measuring the sound levels crossing the property boundaries met
the Town's maximum permissible levels for noise generation.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 I SEA N A L Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: April 16, 1985
I
I
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Traffic
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Description: Intersection of South Street & Wadino
River Road
Distance to Noise Source:
75 ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 9:05 a.m. Time Completed: 10:05 a.m.
~otal Time during Test Run: 1.0
lll~s/hours
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
49.3
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
83.4
dBA
NOTES:
4 dump trucks passed intersection
28 cars passed by intersection
I
Data Recorded By: ~ te_ t/~.
Date: 16 April 1985
I
I
Sheet
of
I
-~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
NOI2.~
A N A L Y S I S - FIE L D
--- ---
SHE E T S
- --
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
proj ec t : SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: 1st Residence on Davton AVP-nllP
Description: (West of Sand Mine)
Distance to Noise Source: N/A ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 10:15 a.In.Time Completed: 10:25 a.In.
Total Time during Test Run: 10
minu tes /0011=
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
45.0 dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
83.0 dBA
NOTES:
5 cars cassed by site causing elevated peaks levels
Da ta Recorded By :~~ q t<. ~ :
.
Date: 16 Aori1 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 I SEA N A ~ Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Da te: 16 April 1985
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Vehicles traveling along South Street
Description: (entrance to sand mine)
Distance to Noise Source:
25-30
ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 10:30 a.m~ime Completed: 10:40 a.m.
Total Time during Test Run: 10 minutes/~~~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
45.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
82.9
dBA
NOTES:
Rioh noise levIes when cars passed site. No trucks passed
orooertv durina pericd of testina.
Data Recorded By: ~ ct ~~~ ..
Date: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N Q I SEA N ~ ~ Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source:
Front end loader
Description: Loadino sand into waitinq truck
Distance to Noise Source:
20
ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 11:00 arnTime Completed: 11:05
a.m.
Total Time during Test Run:
5
minu tes /*==
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
50.4
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
84.3
dBA
NOTES: One truck passed by.
Data Recorded
BY:~ Q ;:?,~~'-
Date: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 I SEA N A ~ Y S I S - F I ~ ~ D
SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Bottom of mine pit - machinerv
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
83 it.
Time Recordings Initiated: 11:10 am Time Completed: 11:20 am
Total Time during Test Run: 10
minu tes /b:cnuoG
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise.Level (Lavg):
47.1
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
83.1
dBA
NOTES:
2 trucks drove out of pit. Recordinos taken near two sand
sorters.
Da ta Recorded By: ~ t( rYcU\-'~ .
Da te: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NQISE A~~~Y~I~-FIE.!oQ ~l!E;.E;.TS
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date:
16 April 1985
proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Front end loader loadina larae rocks onto waiting truck
I Description:
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Distance to Noise Source:
15 ft.
11 :25arn Time Completed: 11: 30
Time Recordings Initiated:
am
Total Time during Test Run:
5 minutes~tl~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
79.2
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
98
dBA
NOTES:
One truck passed by.
Da ta Recorded By: ~ C<
I?-, ~ .
Da te: 16 April 1985
Sheet
of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 I SEA N A L Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 16 April 1985
Proj ec t: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: Bottom of sand mine pit, rneasurinq sand and Gravel sorter
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
25 ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 11:35 am Time Completed: 11:45 am
Total Time during Test Run:
10 > minutes/~r.s
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
dBA
84.9
87.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
NOTES:. Onp t-r\lrk ~n(l nnp t:'f'"<=lrtnr Da~sed bv.
Data Recorded By:
-j(~<- {L ;::.>,
Date: 16 Aoril 1985
~
Sheet of
I
.
.
-.
.
.
.
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 I SEA N A L Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Da te: 16 Avril 1985
Proj ec t: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: LiD of mine (hiohest elevation) Dointinq towards mine
Description:
Distance to Noise Source: 800 ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 11:50am Time Completed: 12:00 pm
Total Time during Test Run: 10 minutes~~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
45.8 dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
83.0 dBA
NOTES:
One truck and one car passed by.
Da ta Recorded By: ~ tL a.,~ -
Date: 16 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
;1
N 0 I S E
A N A L Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
- --
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date:
16 April 1985
I
I
I
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Along property line adjoining Pine Hills Country Club
Noise Source:
Description:
pointing towards mine pit.
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
il
Distance to Noise Source:
800+
ft. (approx)
Time Recordings Initiated: 12:20 om Time Completed: 12:30 p.m.
Total Time during Test Run:
10
minu tes M:mwos
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
45.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
76.6
dBA
NOTES:
Hich lpvpl~ from man hammerina behind equipment.
Da ta Recorded By: ~~ t{ o;l ~. .
Date: {/- f(,-JS"
'I
Sheet
of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 I SEA N A L Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
---- ---- ------
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Da te: 16 April 1985
I
I
proj ec t: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Loc a t i on: SOUTH STREET. MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: 1 large truck accellerating UP hill out of sand pit.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
6-8
ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: N/A
Time Completed:
~otal Time during Test Run: N/A
minutes/hours
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
79.5
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
dBA
NOTES:
Da ta Recorded By: ~ tt' ;::::~.
Date:
16 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
N Q ! ~ E A N A L I ~ ! ~ - FIE L D SHE E T S
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 29 April 1985
proj ec t : SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noise Source: 40 yard (7) dump truck (idling) waiting
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
75 ft. (approx.)
I
Time Recordings Initiated: 4:45 p.m. Time Completed: 4:50 p.m.
~
Total Time during Test Run:
5
minu tes Pffi!5l!~'S
I
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
52-54
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
75.8
dBA
NOTES:
Data Recorded By: -ft~~ - t( ~.
-..~"'-
Date: 29 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N Q I ~ E A N A L Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date:
29 April 1985
Project:
SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location:
SOUTH STREET. MANORVILLE. TOWN OF BROOKHAVRN
Noise Source:
Ambient noise level
Description: No operation of equipment wi thin sanrl
mine.
Distance to Noise Source:
N/A
ft.
Time Recordings Ini tia ted: 5 :00 p.rn.Time Completed: 5,' <; II m
Total Time during Test Run: 15 minutes/hours
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise.Level (Lavg): 45.0
dBA
Peak Noi se Level (Lmax): 45.0
dBA
NOTES:
Da ta Recorded By: ~_ U-- {J ~.
, .
Date:2g April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
-.
I
I
N 0 I SEA N A L Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
--- ----
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Da te: 30 April 1985
Project: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREEI', MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
I
Noi se Source: Sand sorter & loadinq
I
I
Description:
measured from lip of mine
Distance to Noise Source:
200 ft. (approx)
I
Time Recordings Initiated: 9:30 am Time Completed: 9:40 am
.Total Time during Test Run: 10 minutes/l==
I
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
I
I
Average Noise.Level (Lavg):
45.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
74.7
dBA
NOTES:
I
I
I
Da ta Recorded By: -;t(~-~ <<
p~
Da te: 30 April 1985
I
I
I
Sheet
of
I
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 I 5 E A N A L Y 5 I 5 - FIE L D 5 H E E T 5
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 30 April 1985
proj ect: SPARROW MINlliG COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET. MANORVILLE. TOWN OF BFOOKHAVEN
I
Noise Source:
I
I
Pro rt boundarv
Pine Hills.
Description:
line - Dointina towards sand
it ad. acent to
Distance to Noise Source:
250
ft.
I Time Recordings Initiated: 9:45 am Time completed: 9:55 am
Total Time during Test Run: 10 minutes/~N~
I
I
I
I
I
DATA RECORDED ~ TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
45.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
65.2
dBA
NOTES:
Apcroximatelv 50' away from 9:30 a.m. readinq.
I
Data Recorded By: ~ ~
I
I
f/~'
,
Date: 30 April 1985
Sheet
of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 I SEA N A L Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date:
30 Aori1 1985
.
Proj ect: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location:
SOUTH STREET, MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHA vrn
Noise Source: Sand cradina ooeration
'Description:
taken from lip of mine pointing towards
pit.
Distance to Noise Source: Ion ft.
Time Recordings Initiated: 10:15 am Time Completed: 10:25 am
~otal Time during Test Run: 10 minutes/~~~~
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
45.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
74.1
dBA
NOTES:
Da ta Recorded By: -;?r~ t( ;f7~.'
Date: 30 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N 0 I SEA N A L Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date: 30 April 1985
Proj ec t: SPARROW MINING COMPANY
Location: SOUTH STREET. MANORVILLE, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
Noi se Source: Entrance to sand mine I South Street
Description:
Distance to Noise Source:
N/A ft.
10:40 am Time Completed:
10:50 am
Time Recordings Initiated:
Total Time during Test Run:
15
minu tes /:>/J.lll;\l;t",s
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
dBA
45.0
55.0
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
NOTES: F:lpvAtpo lpvp] from Snnn trnrk 9?ssina bv monitor.
Data Recorded By: ~ ~ ;/~.
Date: 30 April 1985
Sheet of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I._"~
N 0 I SEA N A L Y S I S - FIE L D SHE E T S
INTER-SCIENCE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, ~
Planning & Development Consultants
P.O. Box 897, Butter Lane Corner
Bridgehampton, New York 11932
(516) 537-1904
Date:
Proj ect: _.... "_
- ""
Location:
.n ,,~~,,_.. ~ _N~' ~-
Noise Source:
Description:
. -
Distance to Noise Source:
~ ft.
Time Recordings Initiated:
. Time Completed: 10,05 a.m.
~otal Time during Test Run: ~
lll.........~ '~/hours
DATA RECORDED FROM TESTING:
Average Noise Level (Lavg):
dBA
Peak Noise Level (Lmax):
dBA
NOTES:
--
A/
Data Recorded By: ~.
q
Date:
.._~
/~
Sheet of
~ , ....... ____....,_::.--".. _~TE- .~--- -.._ .....--..JIII.~.....~.....w~.I(U'-~~~~ ~ .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Benner! Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOD L. HARRIS
Supervisor
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
._' ..'_d .;."
',,~ ."
Town Hall. 53095 MaIO Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765- I 938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Fax (516) 765-1823
~p.ptember 5, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, New York 11935
Re: Site Plan for
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
SCTM # 1000-83-4.5
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Grim:
This is to ask you to comply with our environmental
consultant's recommendation that you complete Part III of the
Long Environmental Assessment form.
A copy of the consultant's letter is enclosed for your
convenience, along with a copy of Part III of the Assessment
form.
This office is sending a copy of the last revised site plan
to the consultant to see if it answers their questions.
If you have questions about the enclosed material, please
speak with Valerie Scopaz of this office.
Very truly yours,
~~d 62~~f'L:/0
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /To. ~
Chairman
cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Zoning Board of Appeals
Charles Voorhis, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~.
CRAMER, Vo.9RH~ !~ , OCIATES
ENVIROW,IENT~t."n:;:P G CONSULTANTS
~~WI/,'1 \\'\
September 3, 1991
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Southold Planning Board
Tow:J Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southord, ~y 11971
Re:
Oregon Road Recycling Co.
SCTM No: 1000-83-3-4.5
Dear Benny:
We are in receipt of your letter of August 12, 1991, requesting that we complete a
review of the proposed pr9Ject including review and correction of the Part lEAF,
cO!':1pletion of the Part II .r:.AF, and consultation as to how to proceed with review of this
project in accord with the State Environmental Quality Review Act.
Please be advised that we have reviewed the documentation fomarced to chis office.
A copy of the corrected Long EAF Part I, and the completed Long EAF P 'crt II a:e included
as a.' attachment to this letter. In addition, we have inspected the site and offer L1e
fol!cl'J.Ting information with regard to review procedures.
The site is presentlv in active use by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., for the ~urpose of
exc~,vation and drainage contracting, soil screening and offices. This use is bemg conduaed
in accord with a previously approved site plan as well as Zonina Board of Appeals
authorization. The proposed use involves the addition of recyc1ing facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid removal, crushing or
cutting) and shipping off the site.
In terms of existing site and environmental resources, soils and vegetation have b.een
modified. The site is predominantly rock, earth and fill; however some landscaping has been
completed near the road frontage. There were no significant vegetation or wildlife resources
identified. The site is within Groundwater Manaj:ernent Zone IV and is in the northern
border of the Water Budget Area designated by ::.CDHS. The depth to groundwat:r is
approximately 60 feet, and groundwater beneath the site mi~rates north. It is noted that
rutrate and aldicarb contamlOation have been identified in tne vicinity of the site, and th~re
is a landfill upgradient of the site which is under investigation to determine impact on tl;~
aquifer. It is suspected that the landfill site may have caused groundwater degrada:::ion.
.,
Tne site is zoned for industrial use,' The area surroundinR the site, east to Cox's
Land, west approximately 750 feet to Depot Land and south to North Road is also zoned
ind~strial. There are intermittent industrial uses in this area. The area north of Oregon
Road is zoned "A-C" district. Land use conflicts of the transition from industrial to .. A-C"
district were considered by the Plannin~ Board in the previous site plan approval which
required a 100 foot setback for the facility from Oregon Road.\\The subject application
should also be reviewed in the context of minimizing impacts from this transition. The r<:lads
Pogo 1 0(3
54.2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 33~.1455
ze-d ~~?O~S~ ~ S! ~~OO.~~~~'ll~'~ -
_-, ~:O:t:-t 1;=:1.=:1 tE.-"? -d3S
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
Oregon Road RecycllnG
Envlronmentnl Review
in the area include Oregon Road (east-west minor road to north), Cox's Lane (north-south-
minor road to west), Depot Lane (north-south minor road to east), and North Road (east-
west 4 land divided highway to south). These roads are presently undennilized; however,
exp3nsion industrial uses in the area and potential confhct with residential street traffic
shodd be considered in connection with tbe proposed project.
The Town Board has considered this action in the authorization of a Recvcling and
Salvage Facility under Town Code Section 48-1. The use is consistent solid waste
management gcals of reducing the waste stream through recycling; however. impacts with
regard to the soecific use must be considered. The Town Board recognized this and
induded many" conditions of the approval for this use. These conditions are included in a
Conditioned Negative Declaration for the use dated March 1. 1991. The nine (9) conditions
included in the aetermir.ation provide the Planning Board with a basis for review of the
project.
Based upon review of the conditions, and the information presented to date, we find
that a Part III Long EM should be preDared to address concerns \\lith re~ard to the specific
site use. The Long EAF Part III is recommended as a means of addressing specific concerns
prior by providing additional information necessary to render a Determination of
Significance with regard to this action. The Part II EAF indicates the impact areas - in
addition, specific requests for information are keyed to the nine (9) Town Board conditions
~- fo!lo.....s:
A)
2)
3)
4)
5)
Tr.. applicant should provide a detailed site plan indicating the location of all
structural site improvements (including concrete/asphalt crusher. As of the date of
this letter, we have not received this information.
Preliminary review of the noise data indicate possible impact due to noise levels. The
location of the equipment must be known to determine levels at locations from the
machinery. In addition. sound barriers (if needed) or sound reduction equipment
which may be available as an accessory on the equipment should be explored. In
addition, we find no information concerning dust emissions from equipment as
required by the Town Board.
The applicant should provide a covenant regarding hours of-operation. An update of
,he status of this mitigation measure reauired by the Town Board should be provided.
The source of recycling material shouldoe indicated in order to assess compliance
with previous conditions of the operation.
A program for mitigation of no i_e. dust, odOj's, and ~ectors should be provided by the
applicant in order .or the Town to have a means of dealing with complaints and Issues
should they arise. !
The basis for vehicle trip ends should be provided. The peak hourly trip generation
should be indicated. III addition, the primary hours of expected truck ingress and
egress to the site shoul~ be indicated.
The status of the wastooil containment shed'approval should be indicated.' Plans for
construction of this facility should be provided.
The means of disposal of collected fluids should..J:>e-indicated. If an industrial waste
scavenger is proposed to be used, the name of the scavenger should be provided.
The applicant shocld provide a covenant regarding allowed access to the site by Town
Officials and/or :e~itimately designated Town representatives. An update of the
status ofthis mi\i63.:ioll measure required by the Town Board should be provided. .
\
6)
7)
8)
9)
:Z:C.d
Puce:: of 3
-s .. ? 0::0 "'5 .s t:::l
1...l ...I ,=' .::. ,-"., ~ _..I ~....' '0 .J ::1
to:; -.?
-"":::13 '=..
"" t
.,. t
I ;~ ..::I
'3
":::; I
I
I
Oregon Road Recycling
Environmental Rcvlew
The information requested above should berrovided by the applicant. Information
.uld be submitted in the basic format of a Part II Long EAF proYlding a discussion of the
~ificance of the impact and proposed mitigation to minimize the impact. I believl;: that
ce applicant is best able to provide this information for review by the Board. Hyou wish
I'" to review the submittl;:d documentation, we would be pleased to provide a cost
mate to review the material once submitted.
I Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this review, and please do not
itate to call if you have any questIOnS.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Very trul~lJrS,
/2//
/ all:.4 ;..:~
'- -'
arles J. V orhis, AICP
,k/
Page 3 on
'd
SW~~~S~ ~ .~ ,~.~OO^~~.w~~~
t t
.. t
I:.l.:l
16-9--d3~=;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECYCLING &
MANUFACTURING, INC.
P.O. Box 31118 . Amarillo, Texas 79120-1118 . Plant Site Address: 12100 1-40 East 179101
June 20, 1991
Mr. Donald Grim
Oregon Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box.300
Cutchogue Long Island, NY 11935
Dear Mr. Grim:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Thank you for your recent inquiry on the Excel 2500 and
Excel 2200 Recycling plants.
In answer to your questions regarding the operating
noise levels of this equipment our reply is limited to tests
which are performed at our research and development site in
Amarillo, Texas. This testing is conducted under controlled
operating circumstance and is not representative of
operations under any other type of conditions. These test
results indicate the noise levels to be minus 85 decibels.
It is Excel's position that noise levels of our
equipment are dependent on a number of variables such as the
materials being processed, the power source (i.e. diesel or
electric) I ect. These variables and the relative noise
levels cannot be predicted by Excel.
Sincerely Yours,
~ GUc-~
Myra Avant,
Project Coordinator
cc: Matt Garth
Wayne Schrandt
I
I
Office. (806) 335-3737
U.S. 1-800-858-4002
FAX # 806.335-3949
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXC~L 2500 LOW-PRO
CRUSHING SYSTEM
51'
~
.
t
13'6"
o
JOB SPECIFICA nONS:
Material: Concrete w/steel rebar, Asphalt, Limestone
Discharge Product: Minus 2.5" X 0"
Design Rated Capacity: 200-400 TPH Approx.
PLANT SPECIFICA nONS:
Travel Height: 1 3' 6"
Operating Height: 1 3' 6"
Weight: 110,000 Ibs.
Power Supply: Cat. 3406 (402 HP)
Hopper Opening Size: 1 g' X 7'10"
Vibrating Feeder Size: 56" X 18' with adjustable grizzly
Crusher Size: Excel 25
Crusher Feed Opening: 57" X 37"
Tires: 1 1 :00 X 22.5 (12)
SPECIAL FEA TURES:
. Low-Profile Design - 13' 6" travel height and 51' length permits highway transport.
. Hydraulic Lift-Mechanism - 6 hydraulic lift cylinders front, center and rear ft
,~
J EX C [E l J ~;B(O(0C3(.8~[8C1~l(O(O ~
C~USHERS Excel Recycling & Mfg., Inc.. Amarillo, Texas 79120
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXCfEl. 2500 LOW-PRO
CRUSHING SYSTEM
_' J: ':~ .' "-:':..,. .-~I}f~f!0~, I 1.,'
"'-~ p."1i'.~~~~~J~>:r~.
. '<:'...-.-_1;:....,..;~~~;,/<r~.....~, ","
.... .~r;:.<,:~<;)'~.~:~_~::~~~~
.
rt ~Ol
--:&-.
1- -.;.;: &: I
~l'~~' ---.-
A l . ... ~~ l~'~, ~ '"
j#~'J~]''''''~ :2~~!jj/'~ ~~rj~~~~~ ~.'
.t1.(';(;. - ~I '11 '~'. .".f.-~./9,--~ ,!-\ .~.
;{".J' - ,- i.. . \..
~~~ t'" f. '-. -~ ~--'" ~ '
::-- . . ; _O:;,ll".:;L c;;uul.-" ,
~~~ t ~
~ / '~-=I
. ~=. .i__~.
-.'C_.
"
-
- - - ""'"'"=:-:<; -: -.,
___.~>;-_~.z:::-:_~?=:,,~- _..
- ~ ~~~- - _",''''-7'"-_~ ~.
.' ~~.::-:-_...- -"~~_p- :--0-:,
.......
:..:.":.........
. . '-~
Typical Feed Size:
CONCRETE AND CONCRETE
PIPE WITH STEEL REINFORCING
Discharge:
PRODUCT
- - .. ~~. - . .".
'.A/ru~..,. '.,-. .. '_-..~ '<. r-
:~:: .."~ ~~i::'....:..."'"":-......,.~- :,--:-.
'\ -~..A--.j . ...,. .1;!',...,..'-...;~;.-:.\~. t .
...:"'""...~....;...,,_.,., .~: ...... f "'~ - )-~~ ,,,..A
.x'- ",~ -h),...:."='~"""'-I::J' --4.",. ,......'"
..... .~_._._ '"i~. .~'" .....__'__L'Rj\!" .....,~~ ; J
;.__....,.....,....'"'~ '~d >l~_ :c. .........' --I..-
.~-l(~..-'9~..J ../--'~-;..L- .~:~~~.
'\po. ~..."".\o!;:,/ .;. t:... "-,.......-,),1, -' ,_ . :,
~oI;J .At..~..~.. ..."'-' ~r' ...~---'- ~~"..
"J.- {j '~-" ~...'~. Jr-..(-Yi .-r. .-"'" ~.......\........",.. "...
.. - ..~J ./'...A~ .''"t:- - .:.. .......... '_.1
~' '-~_-...<-'-',-~ ..J'. l".:'. r:. ...--.1:'
.t."('. . ..:wr I ,'{..:-...:...,............Jtl ,,)'....}.... ,:.. :
~.(" ..;.,~..., P~'_'I..J.....--..... "_"..' ~'-
.~ ..L...>-.:.,s..~~\..,.:--- ..~.......,'-A.,y_ "'f"'-........L"'
.J" I!-;." _).~__"}:........ 'L.1 ;Y _. .....-.,J-. r"o .
-".........;,)1\....''(1 ."...(..,~;J.\'~~J~ ',..f" rf:"''-'l/.
. - .... . 1:.,- ,.: -.. ;....~....- lJ'
Call us for a recommendation and
quotation for your particular needs.
We design custom plants and systems
for unique applications.
EXCrEtL JWl8 c).Oc:J18;::3,~3::Jl': ~.() c) f.~
CIRUSHIERS Excel Recycling & Mfg., Inc.' Amarillo, Texas 79120
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Crushing For The Future ...
EXCEL 2200 LOW-PRO
CRUSHING SYSTEM
." .r .
.
" .
'..
."
G
13'6'
I / - \--
I ' _ _ I
n
n
,
0" ri1
47' ~.
JOB SPEC/FICA nONS:
Feed size. Reinforced Concrete, Brick & Block, Asphalt, Wood, Stone,
Contaminated Materials
Discharge Product. 200 TPH
PLANT SPEC/FICA nONS:
Crusher. Excel 15 Impact
Crusher Opening. 42 "x31 "
Vibrating Grizzly Feeder. 46 "x16"
Step Grizzly Bars
3/4" Steel Hopper
3.Axle Chassis
Power
CAT 3406 Diesel w/100KW Gen Set
42" Discharge Conveyor
11.00x22.5 Tires
Operators Catwalk w/Control Cab
Eriez Magnet
SPECIAL FEA TURES:
Designed for quick set up, completely self-contained unit, (4) hinged support legs.
ft
~~
_ "~jEXCrEl LJ c(B~@~$5~CI~J@(o~
CRUSHERS or 806.335-3737
Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc.
P.O. Box 31118 . Amarillo, TX 79120
LOW-PROFILE - CRUSH AND MOVE
FIELD PROVEN
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"LL \J'::;:'V ,..... ~~'....,....., ;:.~~ -"":l ;:"""V":l
1""'1 J l-.' ..~, L.~~lilJ..-4 . __'i ~ i,-_ ,; ......_. _ :...lOP
~
EXCEL SUPER 2200 LOW-PRO
RECYCLING SYSTEM
, -
-
....... lJ '7) '7) '1 ..... l ',\'J c-::l rn ~ \ ""
/.H. l.0~~:,~~",,[)JiJ'J U \~ \Cu"~~~fJ
Call us for a recommendation and
quotation for your particular needs.
We design custom plants and systems
for unique applications. '
Discharge:
PRODUCT
~
~~
ENVIRONMENTAL
RECYCLING SYSTEMS
Typical Feed Size:
BUILDING
RUBBLE
~ y ~ r:e r1 1 ,':).). ('" ,~' ,'.:.::38 1 C'" C) ../"'.
~~v~tl. -J ur(',) l ' JDrg;;)\0C1~.?, j, ,~
C~USHE~S or 806-335-3737
Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc.
P.O. Box 31118 . Amarillo, TX 79120
'. .
.'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;Vest Texas
~OO^r-M ,:,ou
P. O. Box 61.47
Midland. To.., ;9,11.'~'?
(9IS) S63.1e~3
1.800.284.2595
DATEI 7/3,/1:!J I
, ,
,.0. OF PAGES: . 7
(Including this pagel
DELIvER TOr \\)AY,,"-lc...
COMPANY; -E- ~c..E.. L..
FAX NUMEER: (~O l1> ') :3 ~'S - 3"14-'1
FROM:_~~v'E.. SA.C..,E.R.
REF='ERENCE: ~4-("l (" ~ ";:D ~ 1" ~ E. ~C.., :r: "-I~
MESSAGE I
f:9 \...UHA. ~ II-.!. ~ ?~ (..,!::' S. C-OV E. R.. S 0 Ubl.~
("'tOL-S,€.. ') -'DA,TA 'F ofL A 34-0..\.0...1", --:iJ'l:TA
~I:JC':\I-Wl? @. \~() Z.?~ ~ ~\'('~')(rHAI€Y
5: '2...1- '-'b ~ f' . '\ \-+ r<<;. .~.~._ I'y -p 1: (A L. ":bAT ):l>,
Q,.- <Z.E....Vf>~E._~ E.k. n: A. T 1: v'C.... 01=- 'IQUR.. E ~ 6r NE~.
'R.~.q ~\U>:r:N..(;' 4-10 _9\-1f ~
'\ \-\ S 'bl\: 0 u, l3:. ~:r: 'r A ) \ k j,;;
:l: t-J V E:. s:r-:!.:" r-. ,b.,.T:J:. ~ c.. -:t:.. --r' .
\~OO Ki'f\.^.. f::ROM-
AR.E. ~/:r; LL
. ....S::...:i-' S TE. V E,;_ A. \LE ~..9.'1"\:) ') ~ M. A "er: L '- {)
.---.--..---
IF VOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL. OF THE PAGES, PL.EASE CONTACT US
11'1 ME 0 I ATEL't' A; l-eOO-2e4-2~9:l. We are tr.ln!:lmilUng frum cUI
NEC/NEFAX.
TO REPLY VIA FAX, OIAL DIRECT TO 915-563-1871.
,
I..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-=I..GS~l
~3 - GSN ESr ENGINE
~':~~8 01 TA JW
-"J7:S-C2 ST~N .~y
. .;~C COCE C4 - SGUND
3~~ ~ER OVERALL
~WR CENT SOUND
!W ~O~D DB(A)
TMI - c;rIGIUE ,:.r'~:J COI"lF' F'ERF
F'ERFCRM':'NCE
CRY MFLD ~YDRA SJy GEN SET-DIE
G;:::~~ 315 t:W ~ 18rcO RF.tt W/O F~N ':,0 HERTZ
(NOlSE) r.'ATA - :-;~~,HAt,:CAL (!f :',.::? F'E:EJ) ~ 1: :I: * 'It :I:
q3CF CBCF OBCF CoB OBCF OBCF OBCF
63HZ 12~,HZ =~t':HZ :.12l2~1! l121lZllZlHZ ::?fi);uIUHZ 4121il10HZ
DB DB DB OS DB DB DB
DATE: 07/::1/9.
TItlE: 13: 57: 1:
* * *
OBCF
8CIZl~r
DB
". -:. l~~ 99 ~- 87 07 91 94 92 86 9~
...... c.,;:.
.,...... c,... 99 a3 87 27 91 94 9? 88 9:
-~.:." . "
....~""' E:<r 9"t eo, 87 87 91 94 9:2 S8 9=,
__u ;,
:~J S~ 9~ 8:: 87 87 91 94 92 Fll'l 95
~::.~ 76 ';'9 e3 67 57 91 94 92 8S 95
-.-.~ 7'~ 99 e.~ 87 87 91 94 92 88 9=
-.'"
:-::~ :) ,.6<; 99 9;; 67 87 91 94 92 88 95
. ...... .- 99 8J 0" e7 91 94 92 68 95
--'" .-/
. ' ~ ~\l 99 83 67 :7 91 ....7'!!.._____ .9.:<" _p' ea c;'~
- '- , .
........_. .-...
:~ 4<; 99 c'" 87 e.. I '71 ';.:; ';'2 8~ 9::
.'
. ~ :2 99 83 e7 87 91 94 92 sa 9:;
.. .,
. - , -~. '19 ~- a':' ~... l?l 1t4 92 ea ~=
....~ ..;...:,. <'l.;, c"
. .. . . <1'7 i,n 81 21 91 <t.l "'~ 66 9~
.. ~ ~..I - .' , ~
c..: 19 99 s- e., 87 91 <;'4 92 se '7::
...
,~ ,.,. 97 B~ Sj f:s~ 89 92 9121 86 9:-
-oJ .......
~. 6 97 61 8" 8=. 89 9:.2 90 86 9;
.... .'
~~~s ~ENTER, TO CGNrlNUE
N~XT TRAN: lNFO COOE I ~4) UNlT TYPE ( E )
I-:.l.r (r-f"J i ,;.:,t:F:?(F'f:~,) !:.xl r(F'f-4) f',e.ILhN(j-'..::,) 1 NDE:: X (Ff-'7)
,
,"-
-
-
-
'.."~' <...---...., '-'..-'
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- Gf.G::J::n T:"II - EM31 NE: ~;\;:; CO:'1f'" F'ERF D';TE: 07/:!.1/~:
c:~:3 - GEN SET ENGINE: F'EF\FORr':A~JcE TIME: 13: ~7: 3f
~:'4l2:6E< nl TA JW DF:V MFLD HVDRA GOV GEN SET-DIE
: M~~ 7 .1 8-2:2 SrAN RY GEN ~.15 KW (!; lSe0 RPrl W/O F~,N 6~' HERTZ
!N!=O COCE ~4 - SOU"'D (NOI!OEl DATA - MECHANffi~n~. 9 FEET) * * * * * * ~. :I:
~E:N PER OVERALL GE<CF DElCF OlOi:F oaeF OEeF oeCF OE<CF OE<Cf
F'~JR CENT !lOUNO 6~HZ .l2~,HZ 2~eHZ ~,0121HZ J.000HZ ~i!J17JOHZ 4C10eHZ 6;a01il,
,'w I non r,r, (Q l nR 0'" n::c n" OF! nR n1'l Oli
:'il5 100 87 79 82 e0 79 e" 81 76 e:
4
=.~~ '1~ 87 79 8'2 el2l 79 82 81 76 e:
:2E.~ e9 87 79 82 S:i:' 79 82 81 76 e:
2=0 65 87 79 co'" e~ 79 82 61 76 6:
-.
240 76 at 79 82 80 79 82 81 76 8;
~:.1~ 70 97 79 82 8:a 79 82 81 76 8:
~~Q) t.4 !7 .,." E\2 Sib 79 5~ 8J. '71,.. . .... ,,8:
.;;.
1.::!i ~7 87... 79 82 50 79 82 81 76 e:
1~~ ~1 87 7~. .- ._. ?2 8'21 79 ..._~l____._..81 7= 8:
.
14Zl 44 87 79 82 80 79 82 81 76 e:
l::il :.;3 87 .,.. 92 Sill 79 82 81 7(:, eo:
, .
1Z::l ...., 87 79 e:: t~ 79 8~ 81 70 e.
_'4 .<.
&0 25 97 79 8~ 821 79 e: 81 76 8.
'"
e~ 19 87 79 82 8f!1 7~ 82 81 ;0 tI.
40 ,. (35. 77 Sill 78 77 elZl 79 74 g,
.....'
20 b 8~ 77 E~ 78 77 80 79 74 E:
~RESS <ENTER~ TO CCNTIN~E
NEXT TRAN: INFO CODE ( 04 l
Hi::L.F'(F'F:.) ACF2(r=-F'~) EXIT(F-f"4) RETL'F:t<tF'f'5)
LJIJI T TYPE ( E )
JND~X(F'F9)
.
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"'3~ C;~Ul Hll - ENGll',,:': Af'iD COt'lF-' f'cr,F DATE: 07/~..1/9
.~:; - L;~.N SIO:T EtlS I Nt:: F- ERr: :':;~~MA:-JCE T!~lE: 13: :=.8:'"
~...~~bEt D1 TO. J~J lJt-::y :'1FL:> HYC'''':A GO'J GEN Sr::'f-DIE
.'~''; 7 Hl-02 SiANIJ&Y GEr~ :15 ~.W '2 1 sel<: RFM W/O F AI\: cO HERTZ
: :~~:. CODE C.., - CSCLit.1.; (NUl:.".!:. ) L'ritA - Mi::.L.'f'ANf:AS)1':F"'49,::? ----) * * :I. * Jl, * * '"
"':'::'1
,:Ei.J PER OVEf:,m.L GSCF . OE'eF Cc.C~ u~c~ OSCF 08CF 08CF OE<C:
~\..:H CENT SOUNl) 6:".H Z .125HZ 25~HL ~""HZ liaiil~Hl 20r2l0HZ '1000HZ 60(i)i2:'
;..;,.J LCi'D ljE<(A) DE< OS DS DS [;OJ:. toE' DS 0&
::15 1021 81 74 77 74 69 70 7!:. 72 ~.
r:
:: ~;) 9' 81 74 77 74 09 70 71:. n 7:
:::'3 e9 - , 74 ;'1 74 6'1 70 It:. l'2 7~
"'-
~60 6"$ S1 74 77 74 69 7b 70 7:2 7:
2';~ 70 81 74 77 74 69 76 70 72 7:
~:::e 70 81 74 77 74 09 7to 76 7::! 7:
:2~~ 64 a1 /4 77 74 b9 76 76 72 7:
:':~ :;'7 81 i'4 77 74 .:9 76 76 72 "
16~ !.1 81 7.:1 7) 74 .. ,t:-9 76 76. . 72 7:
.. -.. ... .
:.:.;) 44 81 7" 77 74 !:.9 76 76 12 7'
'0
1:~ J.8 81 74 77 74 c9 76 76 72 7
l ~{1 ., .., 61 74 7i' 74 69 70 76 n 7
......
=~ 25 a1 74 77 74 69 76 71:: 72 7.
e2 19 81 74 77 7'1 69 76 76 n- 7'
~~ 0- 79 71 75 n 1::7 74 74 71,] 7'
.;. .~.
-., 0 79 72 7~ 72 67 74 74 70 -'
.,.;.:- ,
;~ESS ~ENTER) TO CONTINU~
NE"T TRAr'j: li~FO C.ODE ( Q:> )
~EL~IFF1) ACF:(PF3) EXITIPF4) REiURNIPF5}
UI'I1,. TYFE ( "
iNDEX (F"F9)
~,
I-
I
DATE: C7/:::1I'H
1 1;1,"-: 1,~' : ~6 : 1::
I"'. SS':; 1 ":"\ t - El\;G! ~:!:: AN!) CC:'\P PERF
_ ':;~N 5€ r ENG 1 Nt:: ~'C:",~'OF;;"ANc;e:
,:::,,~, Dl -:'A:W Dr.;;." MFLD HyDRA GL)V l;E.N SC:T-on:
'.~~7~~-~2 STA~OEY GE~ 315 ~:w ~ lS~3 RPM W/Q FA~
1: .:. :.:;:;5: 0.:' - SOU~'H) :. :'~:.J i SE} ...;01 .., - EXr'~1'~ST -!! 4. q
_ .:. ',; PER C;\.'E:F:ALL Ce.cr-: OBCF OE<CF OEteF OBCF
~,' CE:NT SOUND o~.Ht 12e.HZ :Z5~HZ =.Ct:lHZ 10\/10H2.
I' :~ LOi;D ,DB I A) [,>8 DE< DB DB Dg
.-
. .....
1_','"\
......1
-c~
.. .
_'::..J
1- ....
. -.\
-."
:- :..~;')
. .....
1 : ~~
:..:.~
.". '"
I'_v
, ......
::l
I ...:,
-.\
-~
1 .- ~'::::
I.::,--I:\FF:)
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
,....7' HE.F',r L
F~~T li< * * * *
OBCF OBCF.
Z\?;(:)0HZ 40~0HZ
DE< DB
1':';:) ':'CS 1:D~1 107 1.~4 10b lIB 1(lj1 96
~5 107 l1il4 llZi:. liZl4 l~b 100 101 96
89 l~~' 1~4 l(1,b Ii,) :. HI:' H<:~ 101j 9~
a~ 100 1/Z)3 105 le3 10e, 99 100 9:-
76 l~o 1~~' 11Zl~ 102 104 99 99 94
70 1lil~ 102 1"'4 11<)2 104 98 99 94
64 10~ 1.1Zl: 1.~4 l~l lill3 98 98 9'"
-'
.- 104 Hll lO~ 1!l.l 102 97 97 92
~I
~,1 ,.,,:\~ lee --"~~ . ;.0g, 11il2 96 97 92
...-..1.... ..
44 1jz)~ 1",21 lC2 .;:? l~l 96 96 <11
;.Q '-02 "''1 lei :;':? l:'~ 9~ ,,~ c."
,..
~~ le1 ~8 l2~ ;: 10;:) 94 95 9Z
.-
.:~ l~~ 97 99 97 9'1 Cf::t 94 89
1Q ~9 90 98 9~ <:;8 92 9;;. es
. - <i8 OJ':' 97 G'= 97 91 92 87
~ J
6 97 <;4 9!l ~: 95 90 90 8'5
',EI~TEc" Tu CONT:~;uE
N::;XT 'r~;,~!-.i: =.r~FO C~.c.E ( 213 )
AC~~I~F:1 EXITlPF4) RE1UkN;~~~1
Ui'JIT ni"E IE)
INDSX(PF9)
,
* * * *
OE\CF
8000HZ
DB
E6
6:'
~:I
84
84
S~.
e":'
82
81
81
80
79
7S
77
76
75
. .....
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-G,:,G,.::':l T:'11 - ENGIN;: M:D CG~':i" 1-'~kF DA~'EI e7/~1/ql
os ~ GE:-I SET ENe; ItJE: F'E:F:FOF::1';i\lCi:: T HIE I l~.: 5b.~:
~~:Z69 01 TA JW DRY MFL.D HYL1R~ GCV GE:I'J SET-uIE
':~1471e-C2 STANt~t GEN 315 K~J ~ 18iil0 RFM WlQ F':.N 6~ 1~e:RTZ
0;' - ~U~:D D~IA t::.)(!-lAUS t> C~ l1li FE:T)
!NFO CO!:: (NO!SE) - 22.9 1. 11: :I: Ii' :l * '" *
GEN F'ER OVERALL.. CEsCF OE<CF eBCF OBCF OBCF OBCF O~,CF, OBCF
;:'w1=\ CENT SOUND o~HZ 12~,HZ :250HZ '::>0I2lHZ 1000HZ 21<!00HZ 40 (!)l!lH Z S00i:l,
K\~ L.a~D ~~(A) DB 0& DEl DB DB De DB 08
~ ~ . 10~ 94 90 92 8e 94 S6 87 61 7'
...;.. ...J
3~Z 9S 94 90 92 87 ~4 at. e6 81 7:
22!!l 89 9~ 69 92 87 '14 Bt> e6 80 7'
"
26~ 83 93 69 91 86 ?::!; e:. 8~ O(D 7:
2.\0 7b 92 ae 913 e= 92 84 8~ 79 7:
220 70 \92 67 90' se. 92 84 84 78 7:
:miD 64 ,91 67 89 6S 91 83 84 78 7 ;
180 ~,7 ~l 86 89 84 91 a:;. 83 77 7(
HoC :.1 9(1\ e6 E::= t:!" 9~ O~ 62 77 L,'
0'
:4;21 44 6O? ..6-.- '''85 87 El3- -.- 89" ",- eE--" 62 "--'-76' ., 6'
1:~ :'8 sa $4 87 82 O? 81 81 7~1 6:
l~~ .;.. 8S ~. --: B.b 8.1. se 60 60 74 6'
,,~
e.~ ~,. 87 63 85 e0 67 79 79 74 b
'::'-'
6,~ lq e6 82 E4 79 6b 78 78 7'3 to
4~ n 85 S~ 6!. 76 85 77 77 71 6
2021 b ,83 /9 61 77 63 75 7b 70 6
=~ESS <SNTER~ TO CONTINUE
N::XT Tr.:ANl 11;1-0 CwU:. l ~:: i
I-:ELF' (F'F l) ACF:? (PF3) EX IT (F'F4) F:ETUF;;<J (FF~,)
\JNH TYF'E ( E
1 NOE;)( (F'r:9 )
"
,
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.:.~G=Q~ T!"11 - ;:~.jGll'l~ A~.~D COl1P FEF.F DATE: 07/311'7
,_3 - ~EN SET E.NaIr-.;~ F'E.t;r- :;~~M;':' JCE Tnt:=:: l~.:~bl~':
."'..r" 01 T~ ~~J ~F;Y r-:FLD H'iURA G~V G!::N SET-fltE
-' ......-...
.. .',... -: 15-0': S.iAh.D'S''i GEN .,. K\<J '2 le~eJ ':;F-t'l W/D FAN =0 H(;;RTl
";'....'
....":'.... C~DE r..-J - SC~:-.'D U.Ju I SE) DAfA-=: X~..L.;S I a-~9.:.: --t:'1) * 'I( 'I( 'I( IJ :I: 'I( l!:
,.., ow """... r-t:....l
,_=~J F'E:;..: '1l:'~1- CaCF Or., OcCF 8CF uBCF DBCF OBC:
':.,.::< CE~jT 1>31-',Z 125HZ 2:;~HZ 5eCHZ 1000HZ 2000HZ 401.!l(!lHZ 8~\lJ2~
".,.. LDAD 1)1:- Ul:l DE< D& on DO cr. DE:
:.'"
: ~ ~ 1(1;0 88 8:. e6 :,. BS 00 CJ~ 7~ b
~...
:::J 95 87 83 8~ 81 87 79 a'll 14 b
_~3 89 87 83 e=, 8i:1 ,,- 7" 79 /4 (>
~I
:6Z! 83 86 62 64 8~ S6 78 79 I~ 6,
::-':'l 76 86 81 E!4 79 e6 78 78 72 6
"..:..:.'j IIA e~ el. s: 79 e~ 77 78 72 \ Q
......., t.A e~. 8!3 e::, 78 85 77 77 7J. \ 6
....... \6
. .; ~ ':57 84 8>2: 82 77 E:4 '16 76 71
=1 8" '.'1.--.... el 77 e" 75 76 IlC \6
- --" .' ~,
.. - ... - ..... ~ ..
.;,. 44 SJ 7e 81. 7e (';~ 7~1 .... 69 'c
-" .... ........ , 0"
:.2 "
. ..'~ 8: 78 80 ~. r.,..., 74 "14- 69 e
. - '6'-
:::J ::'2 81 77 :"-1 7::- -=1 7:- 74 6a e
~ (.. :5 E.e 7b 7S 74 80 72 .,..,. 67 t
.....J . -'
~"" 19 7" 7~ 77 7"':, 7e; 71 i''L bb :
... :~ J." 78 74 76 ...... 78 70 71 b~r !
-' l.;.. ,
. , ~ 77 7::' 7~ 72> 77 69 :''1 6.:. ~
, ; E;: 5 '!:N1'EF.:'- ,. 0 CChlT Ir-Jlj~
NEX,. TRA~: INFO CDUE I 04 )
HE~~IPFll ~CF2IPF31 EXITIPF4) RETURNIPF:)
UNIT TYPE ( E
11';!JE:X n:'F-9)
,
fi!llo..~W',I!.Ri'~~- 7- - - .
~~,~~~~~~~~~,\:" ~ ,"<="-'
l'1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
iJi'~0t~,'1kig:~-~.jJ;,,;;~~i;";"~i;;:i~:~:,,~::,~':1'k:'i~:~;~"i\k'{';:''''~:i~:' ,
:;::","~",,":,~~F' /<::"""""'-
APPENDIX {;
'.. {.,.,
r_"";-"'~'~!:~'~r'f'~F';~'~)f~:")1';~:_;_.: 'Z"7~f:'::;ry,~\:;~"~,~-,~<,,.,~,~~-
,
E
.
.
.
~
.
.
1=
I~
..
.m
."
~..
-s;
;c:
Ii
O'
~i
.r>
.
.
. ~
~ 0
,
;; :
-
~ .
.
n 0
ft
~ .
;
'"' ~ .
i
~
~ '< -
i
~ ~, .<
.- ..
.;;
.
;:, -
,J ~ t.l ft
~ .
,
~ 0 .
.... ./ J" g- o .
. :
0
.
ft 3:
.
.
.
. ft
. .
0 .
. .
. :;
0
T
0
~ ,
, I
,
.
g ft
.
I
.
;
~
.
c
,
;
.
<
,
,
.
,
~
INVOICE
PAYABLE TO. LONG ISLA1lll WASTE OIL GOIlP.
62 FAIRFAX DRIVE, GORAM, NY 11727
516-732-7702
SOlO TO
OregaD Road Recycling Corp.
SHIP TO
..
I
. =>
cO ..::; c
..
~ :lI"oC .,..
oon -ao
~.::; ~n
, o.~
, litE! u=
, oz
, zo
! .- .....:. ~
o. ...
..
. "" n
,
, .
c "
! ..
:1 n 0 0 0
" " ~ l ~
.- .. !
!. n .. ...
a ,.. 0 =
c- O . .
O.
J!;: .. .
" .. .
i2 .. 0 3: ~
.
,- Do !I. ~~
c. .. "!I
'-
!C! .. ~- J
.. c .~
z ... .c
- z"
. 0 -.
;; ~ E-
o
= ... ..
c III
. ... ;<
...
... " ...
.
'" . ~
'" ~
= !!l
.. >
. ....
F '"
3:
'"
z
....
...........
02526
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Cutchoaue. BY
I
POBox 300
""72'
-"
I
I
I
I
I
C'_rtto""'.
I
CUSTOMErs atDII T~~ IT:11MS 1-'" f.O.I. DAI(
20 don 913/91
-
200 gal. w..u oil " 20 00
. -.
, .
- ..
".
~~ ~
~>>
10
:iI...~"j...-,
...... ~.
TOTAL $20 0
I
. m'~'~''''-'''"~''''~'::,:7''"''''~'"'"'","~'~'-''."";"r.~?,,?,,?,,,,~.'r:{~':.7'>'1',~~?7,~'
Cl XI ClN3dd'd .
I
I..
. ;.'
I"""'"
, ,if:
I'
1
1
1
I
1
I'
I'
Iii,.
,<.
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
"
11/7190
I SOOTHOlD TM COLLECTlOII CEJlTER
DECEMBER 1990
SCAlEHllUSE MOIITHl Y REPORT
I CUlU1.tiye 1990 Monthly M.teri.1 5011.ry lin TOMS) Through DECEM8ER 31
JAIl FE8 MAR APR MY JON JII. AU6 SEP OCT NOV OEC TOTAl.
litH
I 8rush Ch.rge.ble
134,65 167.31 298.47 691.94 266.75 379.95 526.31 355.04 206.81 266.88 336.92 216.00 3847.03
C .. 477.43 371.34 606.41 491.65 565.99 474.47 1196.40 468. 11 597.13 656.17 589.n 660.65 6855.52
I Concrete 36.22 73.00 104.25 120.66 42.44 87.32 280.41 101.54 67.85 65.50 18.67 51.14 1049.00
L.ndc1e.,ing 150.58 626.17 1037.32 140.53 161.36 174.91 212.74 110.39 107.88 116.38 104.44 41.12 2983.82
Rubbish Iii xed) 204.00 166.44 433.78 337.61 2S7.52 257.35 454.13 331.95 264.04 317.59 276.11 314.96 3615.48
I Scup Nth1 57.3\ 51.n 57.31 52.16 42.19 49.89 53.14 70.68 56.29 109.18 41.37 49.62 690.91
Tires 16.54 14.95 16.54 24.05 23.27 20.00 14.27 15.56 10.00 8.68 22.00 25.00 210.86
I TOTAL: 1076.73 1470.98 2554.08 1858.60 1359.52 1443.89 2437.40 1453.27 1310.00 1540.38 1389.28 1358.49 19252.62
Non-Chargeable
I Agricultural 38.37 11.13 5.66 10.72 5.56 0.52 2.36 65.73 85.79 72.93 77.32 60.02 436.11
6.rbage 1234.37 962.64 1145.13 1264.33 1330.61 1603.99 2734.58 1776.54 1529.01 1297.51 1065.64 1065.42 17009.77
LuYtS/6rall
I /Mulch 48.00 43.32 182.78 397.47 407.14 357.40 394.04 254.99 187.77 239.74 312.64 418.98 3244.27
Sand/Sod 56.29 791.26 349.38 163.84 583.30 569.16 SII.09 920.60 229.00 1039.59 361.02 747.62 6322.15
Shell Ii sh 0.62 3.32 10.89 15.24 5.00 5.35 11.25 10.60 0.54 62.81
I Sludge 20.66 17.17 18.04 37.03 8.44 58.00 142.01 66.65 41.23 33.04 69.34 9.65 521.26
Wood Chips 4.27 10.36 4.85 10.10 10.98 20.25 10.47 19.28 7.72 6.94 105.22
Household
Recyc1ab1n 37.34 34.71 53.50 60.79 68.77 70.56 106.99 119.59 118.54 108.37 92.33 116.8\ 988.30
I TOTAL: 1435.03 1864.50 1765.47 1939.03 2407.14 2680.62 3917.29 3229.35 2207.16 2821.71 1996.61 2425.98 28689.89
I GRAND TOTAL: 2511.76 3335.48 4319.55 3797.63 3766.66 4124.51 6354.69 4682.62 3517.16 4362.09 3385.89 3784.47 47942.51
I Wute Oil
Igallons) 1380 850 1125 1135 1390 S55 1655 1145 1IS0 1265 1333 1278 14261
I Toxics
1101 55
I gal drulS) 17 16 11 9 12 65
NOTE: Non-ch.rgeab1e 'recyc1ables' are glass, plastic containers, tin and alUlinUl cans,
I nevspaper I corrugated, batteries, and office paper. AlOftg chargeable itels, scrap
let.1 and tires '.re .150 recycled.
I -I-
\
I
..
I SOUTHOLD TOWN COLLECTION CENTER
JUNE 1991
I SCALEHDUSE NONTHL Y REPORT
CUluliti.e 1991 Nonthly Niteriil SUlliry lin TONS) Through JUNE 30
I 1-- --:
JUNE
YTD 1 CHAN6E
I : Tohl 1 Chinge 1 Chinge rrol TOTAL rRDIl YTD
JAN rEi NAR APRIL NAY . Tons rrol Niy June 1990 TONS LAST YEAR
.
--- --
Iltel Chirgeiblt
I 8rush 226.57 160.72 449.92 645.79 189.34 251.58 32.91 -33.81 1923.92 -0.81
.n 0 181.70 214.57 385.11 471.95 460.14 402.46 -12.51 -15.21 2115.93 -29.21
Concrete 7.21 11.52 18.67 39.11 44.95 13.77 -69.41 -84.21 135.23 -70.81
I Lindcluring 47.61 48.05 43.73 55.91 139.13 49.69 -64.31 -71.61 384.12 -83.21
Rubbish lli.ed) 140.14 161.20 226.65 310.43 298.93 315.95 5.71 22.81 . 1453.30 -12.31
SCriP Nehl 82.52 27.66 36.48 53.81 40.00 49,68 24.21 -0.41 290.15 -6.61
Tires 32.25 26.77 17.00 20.00 19.98 22.00 10.11 10..01 138.00 19,61
I TOTAL:
718.00 650.49 1177.56 1597.00 1192.47 1105.13 -7.31 -23.51 644G.65 -34.01
I Non-chargubl e
Agricultural 120.57 7.61 6.85 17.92 5.46 1.00 -81.71 92.31 159.41 121.51
, 6arbage 992.56 808.29 1009.17 1155.26 1097.17 1341.72 22.31 -16.41 6404.17 -15.11
6r ass f f f f 251.24 136.97 -45.51 f 388.21 f
. Lea.es/6r ass
INulch 90.08 61.73 196.70 467.05 184.05 94.04 -48.91 . -83.51 1093.65 -23.81
I SandlSod 1.72 656.57 744.74 528.20 1111.99 477.11 -57.11 -16.21 3520.33 40.11
Shellfish 2.32 5.11 120.31 -53.11 7.43 -49.91
Sludge 175.15 303.93 12.87 1.38 39.35 47.99 22.01 -17.3% 58G.67 264.41
I Wood Chips 1.32 0.19 7.10 7.17 3.47 3.58 3.21 -64.6% 22.83 -22.81
Household
Recyclables 112.30 92.99 124.61 145.81 134.70 158.84 17.91 125.11 769.25 136.21
I TOTAL: 1493.70 1931.31 2102.04 2322.79 2829.75 2266.36 -19.91 -15.51 12945.95 7.1%
I 6RAND TOTAL: 2211.70 2581.80 3279.60 3919.79 4022.22 3371.49 -16.21 -18.31 19386.60 -11.31
I Wash Oil
(gol1ons) 854 530 2317 1825 1585 1305 -17.71 135.11 8416 30.81
I Toxics
(I of 55
gol drulS) 30 9 14 10 12 19 58.31 111.11 94 80.81
I ----
NOTE: Non-Chargeable 'recyclibles' are glass, plostic cootoiners, tin ond alulinul cans,
,
I nevspaper, corrugatld, bott,rils, ond offiCI poper. Along chorglable itels, scrap
letal ond tirls arl il50 recyclld.
I t 6riss not counted slparatlly until Nay 1991.
-.
--.--
.Ja" I
-rkrw
MATERIAL Summary 01 11 90
Date - -
W 'ght Tot Charge
Net e1
1/
16400 Ib.;/
77180 Ibv~
198660 Ibr/
4860 Ib' /V
522600 1 b ?/
16670 Ib '7
764601b%
36400 1 b /':
21740 Ib:/(
56460 1 b U'
97600 Ib~
1201b'l/
70520 1 b ./ .
, , ~... - , 0'" I ,. - .
'- - - - -17' - -- - - -- - - - - - - -- - -.-
'fI~ <!..,
/1;1 rO
MATERIAL Summary -;jt,lV page 1
Date 01-18-90
Net Weight Tot Charge
26660 Ib~ 0.00
76480 IbVV 158.40
185420 Ib V-k, 1850.20
10820 I b -::f./ 108. 20
606600 Ib~ 0.00
O.
~=~
~=I/
I
I
I
Tirne 16:57:31
.. of Loads
fRIAL
A
SR
I~O C
~crt Ie CON
G
:IiC'tdr~' ~
NIp /fI, M
-'9"I'~ OT
'.. P
R
RM
SA
3
46
138
3
120
34
11
3
1
1
149
1
3
I
<eport Totals
I
I
I
I
MATERIAL
I A
SR
'0 C
Irf.k CON
G
.. of Loads
513
Net Weight
1195570 Ib
End
of
Report
-. ..". . ..... . - .
-=-..::.---..: -- -_._- _. - - -- - -- -- ..-
Time 16:53:19
.. of Loads
3
35
130
3
127
l/ear~' LA
"'e. I/lt OM
~ 1't1j R
I SA,
Report Totals
7
1
227
1
37280
16280
118420
18140
.. of Loads
588
Net Weight
1128190 I b
I
I
I
End
of
Report
IIII.r-
page 1
/
0.00
134.60.
1961.20
48.60
0.00
0.00
437.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
877.60
0.00
0.00
.
Tot Charge
3459.00
-- .... . . ~ - - ,. - -
25.60
. 0.00
1110.80
0.00
Tot Charge
3253.20
~
I
I
-tRIAL
A
J; B~
,1' ~ ~e..CON
I ~
,1~clallr,~fLA
'i..'l1tw,!OM
'~/JI'~ O~
- SA
SL
r,/tl),( fq
I J ~,(,;
MATERIAL Summary '-' page 1
Date 01-25-90
Tot Charge
Time 16:59:06
tI of' Loads
Net Wei ght
10940 Ib.l~
28600 1 b 11;1/
200560 Ibn-
5580 Ib r ~
492380 ilb /~
18450 Ib /y
27420 Ib /~
15700 1 b ';/"
28860 Ib;~
43440 Ib ".V
22600 1 b /./ I
7720 Ib
I
<eport Totals
I
I
I
I
-----
r--'------------
I
2
24
135
3
118
37
6
1
1
94
2
1
tI of' Loads
424
Net Weight
902250 lb
End
of
Report
0.00
127.20
1998.00
55.80
0.00
0.00
274.20
0.00
0.00
417.00
0.00
0.00
Tot Charge
2872.20
.--------- -- - - -- ---------
J. - U, - 'ft:;
..,.1,1'1/ page 1
Date 02-01-90
Net Weight ~ Tot Charge
22740 lb ~ 0.00
24000 lb ~ 240.00
294620 lb~ 2929.00
61060 lb ~ 610.60
528800 1 b ;;./ 0.00
24080 lb V// 0.00
214100 lb~~ 2141.00
('4780 lb/ 0.00
186060 lb. /,/./ o. 00
83320 lb 7~ 811.80
1320 lb /.1 0.00
14200 lb "V 0.00
MATERIAL Summary
IMATERIAL
Time 17:03:47
tI of' Loads
A
I' BR
c.D C
~" nc- re 'l-e.- CON
I r1 JC~f1~7 ~~
1(1 fIJ9 w.;-. OM
(...t!l"'~J R
SA
SL
2
37
168
I>
118
46
21
1
4
146
1
I
I
2
Report Totals
tI of' Loads
552
Net Weight
1359080 lb
End
of'
Repcrt
.... _..~~--
Tot Charg8
6732.40
Ly~~~ar-
&-~
I
.""'.
-
.'
."p"
,..
;"-.
.;.---~ ."
'--""!'-:.;-
!" 5<:--;--
~
__ _~.........~. :.:I:.:-.r...~.i
. v~:: ...~- :~\ _.~ :.~
~.' :
.~'._-."'.
r
.
I...~.~.;.""t: .:;Z:~_ ~ -~':...-~
: .: _'.:. ;:' '~..'. ~ 1-,:
..01,...,"- -.~;~l~,..;;~.:,.....~:-...
~.~;:n.~!-r..
MATERJAL ~UMM.ry -r-/~-fl
TtM. O.t. 't-h....jf p,ag. 1
""ATERJAL 1~.!2.26 07/Z4/ 1
. of Lo,ads Net Weight Tot Ch.rgeo
1 20 Ib 0.00
A 1 380 Ib j 0.00
, BR 149 97400 Ib
CfD 1179. 60
C IS8 118360 Ib 2367.20
CARD I 4420 lb 0.00
G(l( rI ~e CCL 6 2220 1 b -:/ 0.00
CON 3 3000 1 b 60.00
FA 27 o Ib 165.00
FP 48 o Ib 96.00
FT 2 o Ib / 100.00
G 146 S89240 Ib 0.00
GL 2 34380 Ib /. 0.00
GR 106 34360 Ib /' 0.00
~/eo,.,.~ L~ 149 24740 Ib :/ 0.00
t7v/gJ":!J & nil' rfJl D~ 18 89700 Ib IS67.60
I 17600 Ib 0.00
34 7S60 Ib ./ 0.00
R 203 ISI980 Ib ;;; 1894.40
REC 18 4S900 Ib / 0.00
S 4 1860 Ib ;/ 0.00
SA 33 1270770 Ib./ 0.00
SL 2
TIN 17660 Ib 0.00
I S240 Ib 0.00
WC 10 34780 Ib./ 0.00
Repo...t Tot.ls . o~ Lo.ds ...~ We 1 gM Tot Ch....g.
1123 2SSIS70 Ib 7429. 80
End o~ R.port
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
.
7- -~--{'IJ
,I.rU
07/31/91
Tot Ch.rg.
I
Ti.... Date
. of Loads
MATERIAL Su...ry
16.01.~:s
Net Weight
MATERIAL
I
1 o Ib 0.00
A 3 6980 Ib ,/ 0.00
BAT I o Ib /. 0.00
c 4JJ BR 188 110180 Ib / 12S0.40
C 191 191140 Ib 3818.80
CARD I GOGO 1 b 0.00
CCL IS 5860 I b ':/ 0.00
C 6 VI C f'e. i. -e.- CON 10 22S2O 1 b 450.40
FA 41 o Ib 26:5.00
FP 87 o Ib 174.00
FT 3 o Ib / 75.00
G 169 700100 Ib 0.00
GL 2 53700 lb. 0.00
GR 132 33060 I b .::; 0.00
UwulC"'~A~ L; 205 32500 Ib ./ 0.00
13 66320 1 b 1326.40
OJ~DI'rj Sdzp ~~~ I 19000 Ib / 0.00
21 3600 Ib . 0.00
P 1 66220 1 b 0.00
R 301 134040 Ib'/ 2526.00
REC 9 28800 Ib / 0.00
S 2 680 Ib ;.,/ 0.00
SA 65 1973900 Ib ./ 0.00
- SL I 6820 I b 0.00
TIN I 5380 Ib ./' 0.00
WC I 7740 Ib 0.00
Report Tot.ls . o~ Lo.ds Net Weight Tot Ch.rge
1465 3474600 Ib 9886.00
End o~ R.port
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l'-
..
p.g_ 1
\
.
,
.
-rL3
,
DONALD J. GRIM
P.O. BOX 300
CUTCHOGUE. N.Y. 11935
FEBRUARY 21, 1992
RECEIVED
FEB 2 4 1992
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
TOWN HALL
SOUTHOLD. N.Y. 11971
SauthoId T -.. ('I...!o:
RE: SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.5. OREGON RD. RECYCLING CORP.
DEAR MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING BOARD:
I AM WRITING TO YOU AT THIS TIME TO LET YOU KNOW THAT I
WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE PLANNING BOARD CONFERENCE
MEETING SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY EVENING, FEBRUARY 24, 1992.
OUR FIRST NOTIFICATION OF THIS MEETING CAME BY TELEPHONE
TODAY, FEBRUARY 21 AT 3:30 P.M. WE WERE NOT ONLY UNAWARE OF
THE MEETING BUT ALSO COMPLETELY UNAWARE THAT OUR PRESENCE AND
PARTICIPATION WERE REQUIRED. I AM CONFIDENT THAT YOU CAN
APPRECIATE THAT SUCH SHORT NOTICE IS MOST UNFAIR AND
UNPROFESSIONAL.
I WOULD BE HAPPY TO APPEAR BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD AT
A FUTURE DATE, HAVING BEEN GIVEN WRITTEN AND ADVANCE
NOTIFICATION AS WELL AS SOME IDEA AS TO THE AGENDA WHICH YOU
WISH ME TO ADDRESS. THIS WILL ENABLE ME TO BE PREPARED TO
ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS FULLY AND ADEQUATELY AND TO MAKE FOR A
POSITIVE AND PRODUCTIVE EXCHANGE.
MY WIFE AND I ARE ALSO EXPECTING OUR SECOND CHILD (THE
DUE DATE IS TOMORROW) AND THIS IS ALSO PART OF THE REASON WHY
I CANNOT ATTEND A MEETING AT THIS PARTICULAR TIME. I TRUST
YOU CAN UNDERSTAND MY NEED TO BE AT HOME.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION OF
THIS REQUEST.
JJ::JJ~
DONALD J. GRIM
CC: S.UP.ERVI~. T.HAR,RIS
""(5'~l{~ ... '.. miUI
~TORNEYS
.
.
. .
DONALD J. GRIM
P.O. BOX 300
CUTCHOGUE. N.Y. 11935
FEBRUARY 23. 1992
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
TOWN HALL
SOUTHOLD. N.Y. 11971
RE: SCTM# 1000-83-3-4.5. OREGON RD. RECYCLING CORP.
DEAR SIRS:
I AM WRITING TO YOU IN REFERENCE TO THE LETTER WHICH YOU
RECEIVED FROM JOSEPH S. ZUHOSKI. JR.. CHIEF OF THE CUTCHOGUE
FIRE DEPARTMENT DATED FEBRUARY 19. 1992.
MR. ZUHOSKI STATES THAT OUR PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN
DEPARTMENT GUIDELINES, "...AFTER THEY HAD MEASURED DISTANCES
FROM THE EXISTING WATER SUPPLIES." HE STATES THAT THE FIRE
DEPARTMENT MAINTAINS A POLICY OF 1500 FEET AS BEING THE
MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE DISTANCE FOR ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION.
AFTER RECEIVING A COPY OF MR. ZUHOSKI'S LETTER I
IMMEDIATELY CHECKED THE HYDRANT AND WATER SUPPLY CHART AT THE
CUTCHOGUE FIRE HOUSE. THE CHART INDICATES THAT THERE IS AN
EXISTING CISTERN WELL ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COX LANE
AND OREGON ROAD WHICH HAS A CAPACITY OF 10,000-15,000 GALLONS
OF WATER WHICH IS ACTIVE. THIS CISTERN IS APPROXIMATELY 600
FEET FROM OUR EAST PROPERTY LINE THUS MORE THAN SATISFYING
THE REQUIRED DISTANCE FOR ACCESS TO WATER.
WE ARE ALSO PUZZLED BY THE FACT THAT THERE HAS BEEN
SUBSTANTIAL RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT NORTH OF
THE GRAY PROPERTY ON COX LANE. WE ARE AWARE THAT NO
INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPER WAS ASKED TO INSTALL A FIRE WELL AND
ALSO AWARE THAT THE CUTCHOGUE FIRE DEPARTMENT OPTED TO
INSTALL SUCH A WELL AT THEIR OWN EXPENSE.
THUS THE ENTIRE OBJECTION RAISED BY MR. ZUHOSKI SEEMS
NULL AND VOID.
J}jJ}~
DONALD J. GRIM
CC:
;~f
TOWN ATTORNEYS
, .
Tdt:l~hune
I.) 161 7:~.~-6907
) ;..
CUTC~GUE FIRE ~PT.
ClTTCHOGlfE. LI.. N.Y. 119:>.5
JOSEPH ZUHOSKI JR. CHIEF
. .
February 19, 1992
Cutchogue Fire District
Nelv Suffolk Road
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Dear Sirs:
Recently Asst. Chief Martin and myself inspected the
property of Oregon Road Recycling Inc. located on Oregon
Road, Cutchogue. After measuring distances from existing water
supplies, it was determined, that said property is not
within Department guidelines. The Department maintains a
policy of 1500 ft. being an maximum effective distance
for fire protection. This property measures as follows:
from existing water supplies.
Depot Lane to property
Cox Lane to property
2121 ft.
2646 ft.
:
It is my recommendation that a fire well be in~talled
at this property.
Firematicaly,
9.~ s r....~' }v
Joseph S. Zuhoski. Jr.
Chief Cutchogue Fire Dept.
Jszjsjz
~
(D)~@~DW~tn1
I1lJ FEB 2 I i992 ! iJJ
,,;;;,,.,, ~N HOlD TOWN
,- nil NING BOARD
.
.
. '
DONALD J. GRIM
P.O. BOX 300
CUTCHOGUE. N.Y. 11935
FEBRUARY 23, 1992
MR. CURTIS WILLIAM HORTON
CUTCHOGUE FIRF DEPARTMENT
CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935
RE: SCTMI 1000-83-3-4.5, OREGON RD. RECYCLING CORP.
DEAR MR. HORTON:
I AM IN RECEIPT OF A COPY OF YOUR LETTER TO MR. BENNETT
ORLOWSKI DATED FEBRUARY 21, 1992.
YOUR LETTER STATES IN THE FIRST PARAGRAPH THAT FIRE
PROTECTION AND HAZARDOUS WASTE PROCEDURE WERE NON-EXISTENT.
YOUR BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS VISITED MY PROPERTY AND
ASKED TO SEE PROPER FIRE SAFETY DEVICES WHICH THEY WERE
SHOWN. THEY DID NOT ASK TO SEE WHERE WASTE OILS WERE STORED.
HAD THEY ASKED THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN SHOWN PROPER HAZARDOUS
WASTE STORAGE PROCEDURES. YOU ALSO STATE THAT LEAKAGE OF
FLUIDS CAN CONTAMINATE THE GROUND WATER. THE ENCLOSED
DOCUMENTS SHOW THAT THE GROUND WATER WAS ALREADY CONTAMINATED
DUE TO ITS PROXIMITY TO THE TOWN LANDFILL. OUR FLUIDS HAD
NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS PRE-EXISTING CONDITION.
WE ARE WILLING TO WORK WITH YOU IN ANY WAY THAT YOU DEEM
NECESSARY TO ENSURE ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE
TO CALL 734-7078 OR 734-7248.
~:I~rL
DONALD J. GRIM
CC:
S.ugI:;.~PJl..~,.~~QQTT",~,~:a.Rg;,..
T.Q.!'!.!iJ.Qt!J!;.RK;~.,\W.J~~J!;lU~..x.A
TOWN ATTORNEYS
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
HEAD BUILDING INSPECTOR, VICTOR LESSARD
CUTCHOGUE BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS
CHIEF CUTCHOGUE FIRE DEPT., JOSEPH S. ZUHOSKI, JR.
. .
CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT
C h N Y i-'.:krhonc
ute ogue, . .
\1935 j: 6) n4~'>907
February 21, 1992
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Southold, NY IJ97J
Re: Grimm Recycling Propery
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
The Cutchogue Board of Fire Commissioners recently visited the above
property for an impromtu safety inspection. During this inspection, the
Board found that both Fire Protection and Hazardous Waste procedures were
non existant. Vehicles scheduled for recycling contain fluids such as
Anti Freeze, Hydraulic Fluids, Engine Oils, and Gasoline. The leakage of
these fluids can cause a hazard to our ground water and if ignited, could
contribute to a difficult fire.
The Board also noted that clear access in and around the perimeter was not
adequate for emergency vehicles and would contribute to delays in fire-
fighting attempts.
This Board also understands that the Southold Town Board has granted approval
to the Grimm organization to operate its facility without adequate fire
protection.
It is, therefore, the op1n10n of the Cutchogue Board of Fire Commissioners
that the life and safety of Fire Fighters and Neighbors are in jeopardy
in and around the Grimm property, and hereby requests an immediate and
thorough Fire Inspection of this facility.
We are looking forward to an expeditious reply, and if necessary. we will
meet with your officials to discuss any parriculars.
Yours truly,
Board of Fire Commissioners
m aF~ za1US:2 ~/@
e~~.7In4;
Curtis William Horton
Chairman
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PlANNING BOARD
CWH:jb
,.
':~~~MER' vo.8~~ AoelATEs
ENVIRONMENT~.t.Nn;~~ . G CONSULTANTS
'. ~WQ.y ~
.
September 3, 1991
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Southold Planning Board .
Tc~ Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold,:-lY 11971
Re:
O[~gon Road Recycling Co.
S M No: 1000-83-3-4.5
Dear Benny:
We are in receipt of your letter of August 12, 1991, requesting that we complete a
review of the proposed project including review and correction of the Part I EAF, .
cOr.lpletion of the Part II EAF, and consultation as to how to proceed with review of this
proj ect in accord with the State Environmental Quality Re"iew Act.
Please be advised that we have reviewed the documentation forwarced to this office.
A copy of the corrected Long EAF Part I, and the completed Long EAF P,rt II a~e included'
as a.1 attachment to this letter. In addition, we have inspected the site and offer l.1e
following information with regard to review procedures.
The site is presently in active use by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., for the ~urpose of
excavation and drainage contracting, soil screening and offices. This use is bemg conducted
in a:cord with a previously approved site plan as well as Zoning Board of Appeals
authorization. The proposed use involves the addition of recycling facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid removal, crushing or
cut' "nd shipping off the site.
In terms of existing site and environmental resources, soils and vegetation have b.een
modified. The site is predominantly rock, earth and fill; however some landscaping has been
completed near the road frontage. There were no significant vegetation or wildlife resources
identified. The site is within Groundwater Management Zone IV and is in the northem
border of the Water Budget Area designated by SCDHS. The depth to roundwater is
a roximatelJ~feet:~d !~rdwate!, b~neat~ the site ~i rates n!lrtH
, v'
. , The site is zoned for industrial use~ The area surrounding the site, east to Cox's
nd, west approximately 750 feet to Depot Land and south to North Road is also zonec
d:1striaJ. There are intermittent industrial uses in this area. The area north of Oregoa
R d is zoned. A-C'district. Land use conflicts of the transition from industrial to . A-C"
district were considered by the Planning Board in the previous site plan approval which
required a 100 foot setback for the facili!)' from Oregon Road'\\The subject application
should also be reviewed in the context of minimizing impacts from this transition. The roads
PagO! 1 00
54.2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MillER PLACE, NY 11764 (515) 331-1455
~~~o.~~ ~ ~!~~OO^'~~W~~~ '~0:_~
I:ol.:f t.,;.-9 -cl3$
. .
-,....'1'<'-.""'.
,.:..,...'tCC....
("';
.
.
Or~l:on ROlld Recycling Corp
Long EM' RevIew
..
:ECOLOGTC.<\L ~NQ ~VATER EE.s.0URCES
Due to the identified u~es. the site does not contain any siunificant natural resources.
Much of the site is unvegetated (rock, earth or iill); accordingly, there is no significant
vegetation or wildlife associated with the site. ' . ,
Water resources have been considered as follows. The site is within Groundwater- .
Management Zone IV (unique water regime with special problems), and is aUhe northern
border of the Water Budget Area as depicted on the SCDHS Articfe 7 Map, and Figure 7.1
of the North Fork Water Supply Study. The depth to groundwater is approximately 60 feet,
and groundwater beneath the site migrates north toward Long Island Sound as is evident in
review of Figure 5-1 of the Report on Occurrence and Movement of Agricultural Chemicals
in Groundwater: North Fork of Suffolk County (SCDlIS. 1982). The North Fork Water
Supply study indicates that the site is within a Nitrate Contamination Area (>8 m$/l), and
witnin an Aldicarb Contamination Area (> 7 ug/l), In addition. the site is immediately north ,-
of the Landfill, It appears from review ot SCDHS. 1982. that the project site lies down
gradient of the landii1l, and therefore water resources could be impacted br contamination
emanating from the landfill. The NYS Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposa Sites in New
York State; Volume 1 (NYSDEC, April 1990), indicates that the Town Landfill site is 41
acres in size and is an active landfill. The site is suspected of receiving solvents from a
machine shop, and is listed as having groundwater contamination confirmed. The site is
current!)' under further investi$ution to define the direction of plume migration and the
extent of groundwater contammatiol1. Accordingly, the site is not within an area which can
be regarded as particularly sensitive with regard to water supply resources.
From a land use standpoint, the site is zoned for industrial use. The area surrounding
the site. east to Cox's Lane. west approximately 750 feet to Deport Lane. and south to Norto
Roadr is also zoned industrial. There are intermittent industrial uses in this area, most
significant is the landfill; however other uses west of the site and northeast of the site. The
area immediately north of Oregon Road is zoned "A-C" district for agriculture-conservation
use (includes residential land use density of one dwelling unit per acre. It is noted that at
agricultural use may be associated with noise and dust. In additionl the site is a minimum of
500 feet deep frof!! the t;oad, thereby all.owing for ~et!,>acks ,and buftering of uses, This was
apparently a conslderatlon of the Planmng Board 10 ImposlOg a 100 foot setback from the
road,for th.e heavy equipm<:nt stor~ge area. .Fr,?!? a land use standpoint, and in
conslderatlon of the lack ot ecologIcal and slgmllcant groundwater resources the site and
area is suitable for properly controlled industrial use. '
~
MB. NOISE AND TRA FFTC
The proposed u~e involves an cxp.ansion o~ an existing in~ustrial fac!lity for
concrete/asphalt crushIng. and automobile recycling, and IS sl\b~ect to conSideration by the
Town Board fofestablish~ent of a Re(.'Ycl~n,g and Salvage Facihty. This type of use has been
known to cause concern with reg:ud to fugItive dust generation, noise generation. and truck
e'''-~~~0
CRAMER, V ;d'~H' .~ ,\ SOCIA TES
ENVIRONMENT~__. '~:: .. ',~G CONSULTANTS
PUlleZ
.
.
NAME:
SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANALYSIS
1- &,Iu..;<. AVl1o, C;:vb 7iit SAMPLE DATE 3/'1/ g,-
r!)'(ejO"Y1 W CVf-Jw)I~
RESULT STANDARD
<2.2/100ml
UlCATICN
HESULT
total coliform .....
specific conductivity / frl.,.
pH .................. ~.9
nitrate ............. 3,S;
free amnonia ........ ..L. 0.02-
chloride............ /7.
sulfate ............. 3(".
iron ................ o./It>
It'IaIlganese ........... .c...OllJ~\
copper ................(0.10
sod.i\l[l\ .............. 1, i"
zinc ................ ~o~
cadmiun ....
lead .......
P1/3+S
a/d,'(A.orl:;
w<.0uIV.-e-...
10.0 ng/l
"'::'0./
S-
f
..
.250. ..
250. "
0.3 n*
0.3 n*
1.0 ..
**
5.0
..
. .
S'l2\N) .
10 PIX>
50 PIX>
- MSf'-(
'7 PIt>
IS- "
* Iron & manganese canbined concentration should not exceed 0.5 IIg/l.
** M:xlerately restricted sodiun diet should not exceed 270 ng/l. Severely
restricted sodiun diet should not exceed 20 ng/1.
RESULT
.-::3
.<:'Z..
""-"2-
vinyl chloride .... (2)
methylene chloride...
1,1 dichloroethane ...
trans 1,2 dichl' ethene
chloroform ...... (100) -<: '2..-
1,2 dichloroethane ... ~
1,1, 1 trichJ.o~.Z- =::>
carlX)n tetrachloride. -
1 bromo 2 chloroethane
1,2 dichloropropane .. ..<. Z.
trichloroethene ...... -< L
chlorodib.<ouuneth (100) ""'-?.
1,2 dibrcrnoethane(O.l)
2 brCll\O 1 chloropropan
bromoform....... (100) -<-2-
tet.rachloroethene .... "" 2-
cis 1,2 dichloroethene -:'::i:.-
freon 113 ............ ..c:::: "2-
dibrOIllCllrethane ......; -:=~
1,1 dichloroethene~ \ Q.....-
bromodichlorareth(foOr .< 1-
2,3 dichloropropene ..
cis dichloropropene ..
trans dichloropropene
1,1,2 trichloroethane
1112 tetrachlo'ethane
s-tetrachloroethane ..
1,2,3 trichloropropane
2,2 dichloropropane ..
1,3 dichloropropane ..
2 chlo'ethylvinylether
l:>erl.zerte ....................
tolueIle ....................
dllorol:er1zerle ..............
e-thylJ::er1zerle ...............
o-JrY'leIle ...................
m-xyletle ...................
p-~leIle ...................
total xylene ...............
2-chlorotoluene (0) ........
m-dllorotolueIle ............
. .4-chlorotoluene (p) ........
total chlorotoluene ........
1,3,5 trimethylbenzene .....
1,2,4 trimethylJ::er1zene .....
m, p-dichlorobenzene ........
1,2 dichlorobenzene (0) ....
.p-dietl1ylJ:enzene ...........
1,2,4,5 tetramethylJ::er1zene .
1,2,4 trichlorol:er1zene .....
1,2,3 trichlorol:er1zene .....
ethenylbenzene (styrene) ...
1 lrethylethylJ::er1zene (cumene)
n-propylJ::er1zene ............
tert-butylbenzene ..........
sec-butylJ:enzene ...........
isopropyltoluene (p-cynene)
n-btltylJ:enzen.e .... _........
hexachlorobutadiene ........
1,2 dibrCll\O 3-chloropropane
RESULT
-<~
....~
<:3
<:3
<'3
""~
~"
L~
-'3
.<:.'-1
<:'l
-<?;,
Generic drinking water limits for volatile urganic and hydroca:rbon coopounds
are 5 parts per billon each. Separate limits established for individual
cqypounds and THM's are noted in pan>ntheses (). The < symbol rteans "less
than" indicating no detection of that parameter.
::>urrul..l\i..:u. Utt' I . ur ntAL I n ::>EtryTCt~
- . ... -:- APPLlCA TlONe
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
TOXIc/HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGE FACILITY
. "'."-.'f"itIlIH I tJ\.Iu,=,;:)\t;Ju IVI; \\,;II'='\;'" all \llala~IJIYI
o above gr. tank [J upgrade exstg. facil1ty
o undergro tank [J transfer facility
o drum/portable cont. [J re-plplng
o vapor recovery 0 dry bulk
o other: 0 eneric tank lan
NOTICE*
Construction may not take place without a val1d Permit to Construct.
Plans w1ll not be reviewed without a completed applIcation.
Property Tax Map No. District 'COD Section 83 . _ Block ~ Lot...!:1.-. ~
Facllity Name: N 'p.. Facility owner: ~ bv,\,,-,tJ. ~~
Address: 11'110 ~~ad Owner's address;:i';> tN. 300
(no.) (streel)
commu'nlty: ~ 'community: ~ NY
State: t-J.y. 7ip' l\q~~ State: ~ liD: l \ti3s
PhOne: (,5110) - T3t.{ -1;;},ti~ Phone: /10) - '""By -7a7~
Person to contact for this project: ~cJc\ &v; vY"> Phone:Es1c..) -73~'7;;>4'6o~
7'3<{- "'TOll.(
Address (if different from owner)
(no,) (street)
(cily) (slale) (zip)
3riefly describe project: ik Q izrr: P
.Slv a'lLd V~c1I'~ ~'b~ WI 6- 'nee.d '. ~ ~ ~. ..:l.
5C All of L()0;-te 0;1 ~d soo q~I/07S or dl~1 -0-1 ~.pYl'''
00 0- rys. h f-k d ~ (M'yzJ ~ CV1\. av,f-, e1.i. jLLi affrrv"-f
>~!y~~~ ~ epn ~ ')
~ {{.."L. 5S 1f1l~ ~ or: YYL{v.r 0; h hu..H-kd~ .Yet.#' E!./b-'10 -oo~
I CERT I FY THAT ALL I NFORMA T ION SUPPLI ED HEREON AND ATTACHED HERETO IS TRUE TO
TH EST OF N LEDGE
,
~\")~Id ,or &vjvr.
prinl name
\\ \ I~ bJ
. date
This appl1cation with attached plans and reports has been r,viewed and
approved for construction and the permit expires* on ~2.'ii~Cf? .
APPROVING ENGINEER fJ.. ~ ~ L/ I - riA TE ---41-q It 2-
SCDHS JOB NO. ~\;v1.Cf' (j boUI FAC. ID.NO. .In - Ol ~b
.
.
. .
"T1
r
m
310
.. .,
:l CD
:l1O
-.0
:l :l
10
tll~
o?-
..
.,~
Q.CD
~n
-i-<
OQ.
::e :i"
:l1O
~
n
o
.,
"tl
'\
,-
.'
... " "
.
.
/8
. -) ~
,
OREGON RD. RECYCLING INC.
P.O. BOX 300
CUTCHOGUE. N.Y. 11935
JANUARY 13. 1992
RECEIVID
JAN 1 5 1992
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
P.O. BOX 1179
SOUTHOLD. N.Y. 11971
Southofd Town Clerk
RE: SCTM # 1000-83-4.5 (FIRE WELL)
DEAR MR. ORLOWSKI. JR.:
WE ARE IN RECEIPT OF YOUR LETTER OF DECEMBER 24. 1991
REGARDING THE INCLUSION OF A FIRE WELL ON OUR PROPERTY.
SINCE THIS IS THE FIRST INDICATION OF SUCH A RECOMMENDATION
AND ONE THAT WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED OR ANTICIPATED, WE
ARE UNABLE TO COMPLY. THE EXPENSE WHICH SUCH AN INSTALLATION
WOULD INCUR IS PROHIBITIVE. THE ATTACHED ESTIMATE REFLECTS
OUR CONCERN.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND FOR YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF OUR
POSITION.
...
ATTACHMENTS(4l
CC: TOWN ATTORNEY'S
TOWN CLERK. JUDITH TERRY
. .
.
.
Box 101 - Main Road
Mattituck, N.Y. 11952
Kreiger Well & Pump Corp.
Well Drilling
Water Systems and Supplies
CONTRACT
(516)298-4141
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO:
DON GRIM
12/31/91
REF. NO: 06716
.s-c. '1"411. 1 000-83-CS- 'M""
POBOX 300
SAME
CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935
OREGON ROAD
734-7078
CUTCHOGUE
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for:
8" WELL TO APPROXIMATELY 90 FEET
8" X 20' ALL STAINLESS STEEL SCREEN
8" X 4" WELL SEAL
20 HP GOULDS DEEP WELL SUBMERSIBLE PUMP MOD #6 DHHO (TO DELIVER A
MINIMUM OF 400 GPM AT 10 PSI)
60 FT 4" COLUMN PIPE WITH 6 SUBMERSIBLE WIRE
4" TEE WITH PLUG
4" X 4-1/2" GRASS FIRE HOSE ADAPTER WITH CAP AND CHAIN
NECESSARY ELECTRIC FITTINGS TO CONFORM TO FIRE DISTRICT SPECS
WELL TO BE SURGED UNTIL FREE OF SAND
NOTE: IF NECESSARY TO GO BEYOND 90 FEET, ADD $26.00 PER ADDITIONAL FT
We hereby propose to furnish labor and materials-complete in accordance
with the above specifications, for the sum of $10,750.00
dollars (TEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS) with payment
to be made as follows:
----------------------------------------------------
TERMS: One Third Down, Balance in full'on completion
'."'-'-'_'~.' -..".;.......... -,..;.;s.;..~
"'<--:..-..--,-..- '- ....... -"-- _'.-....c:":'" .. ~-"\;!..-;..".-,.,~.'"..>..._: _,'0"".':: --' ,_ :.:-J;':-'~,.. '.. '__, :.;...;.:...,,_ '~"..::!,-- .'~
,.:..;o:.;;;..~.,..,.;" .P--"~
KREIGER WELL & PUMP CORP. CANNOT TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE QUALITY OF
THE WATER. The Builder and or Homeowner shall be responsible for the
location of the well. ANY CHANGES IN DEPTH OR RELOCATtON OF WELL, WILL
BE CHARGED TIME AND MATERIAL AT OUR PREVAILING RATES. ALL BACKFILLING
AND TRENCHING IS ROUGH GRADED. FINISHING OR LANDSCAPING IS THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER. All material is guaranteed to be as
specified. All work is to be completed in a workmanlike manner according
to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifi-
cations involving extra costs, will become an extra charge over and
above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents
or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado, and other
necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workman's
Compensation Insurance.
DATE: 12/31/91
Signature
Authorized
Signat~e4f (tfh -' k./
, I I'
.
.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennell Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Lalham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kennelh L. Edwards
~~~,
l.:c'....\,
c. "'" ri
~ ~
~ .. :;r.""
?tQ./ ,.. i-~~
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
December 24, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutch~9\l.e ,-_!,~w Yor~.1~5
Re: Request for Installation of
Fire Well for
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
SCTM >> 1000-83-4.5.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Grim:
The Planning Board would appreciate your inclusion of a
fire well on the revised site plan as noted on the attached copy
of the plan. Also enclosed is a copy of the Fire District's
report recommending installation of same.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact this office.
Sincerely,
~~~:9---/v(r
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Encls.
,
. .
· I' I
CUTCHOGlt.7RE DISTRICT
Cutchogue, N.Y.
11935
.
S,aOH u=:
fb
b~ Telephone
(516) 734-6907
December 19, 1991
Mr. Bennet Orlowski, Chairman
Southold Town Planning Bd.
Town Hall
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Ref; Donald Grimm SCTM#1000-83-03-4.S
Dear Mr. Orlowski,.___.__.._
_.-._--~-_._---.-
Reference the above properties, it is the opinion of this board that a
new fire well be placed as marked by an X on the enclosed drawings.
The Fire Well is to conform to our specifications and be equipped as
follows;
1, ~O H.P., 3 Phase, Submersible pump capable to deliver 400 GPM
at 10 PSI discharge at center of tee at top of well. Pump shall
be of submersible turbine type, equipped with grease packed
bearings in bowl assemblies. The bowls shall be. of a smooth
finish design to guide the water from one stage to the next
with a minimum of turbulence.
,
2. Top of the well is to be finished off with an 8" x 4" well seal.
4" galvanized tee and plug, and 4" x 4-1/2" solid brass ferrule
and cap. The hose threads and hydrant wrench nut shall conform
to the standards of the Cutchogue Fire District.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Very truly yours,
rJ~~)/fi4/2C:;:
Mathew J. Martin
Secretary
mjm/encl.
00 ~c:::u 00
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOAHO
,-
.........--,-,
"
- ~. I' .
~~,_~, . v',
.-. . ~ L
"."~.,,,,,,=,,,,,.,,,,,.,..,,. ..... '. ,.6._, . I " \
,;.~"",-.-"j. ~ -
I / 30
~ I~' I ~
~"t::) ,.,
w ", "l I
~''<:)
>i?::: I ~ (
. ~ \, . ~.~ I ·
0: c Jf-s' I.
~ ~., /0 ~ ~ II
~ \ \ (~
S ,1<: \ \ ,
~ ~\;'(h r~ /' ----i--
~)~~ ~ Jf .
-'X; , ,'- - "''filERG1'' 1,1/5
- X )(. -;Ie-"* el'~
\ ,.B r7:fiS\ v t!' t7
t'X/~/i"5 I/t] ~ I' 0-
(il1\~q . ~
/ ~ ~ ell l~h"1-:::1 /..p.
e }( .\ ,.8- -=- .
. /qr. ({;.I" -:::-=:-- ,\,
-I 0" *
(, '''. ~~.,
J(: E,,;:G'REENS
~
~
~
'-
, ,
\f
Ii
()
P((>P{14\ (fl
:,(.[? !J Ie
':>'1
.)
L~_
C!.P.:\, ~
'@/~.{'
./ roc ,
<
.0
.~~
'.-. I
0:.
o
.
.
. "
Je- eO-
'N. 0>
piO P ~ yr1tJ/' .
,,,(I
"~
.~, /.'
4-.' '"
,
n. LJ T 7
......
~
~
~
~
.
"
. .
/!;;v0<- C'~
>,
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennell Orlowski, Jr" Chairman
George Ritchie Latham, k
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
,-:'i;j~"-''"::>-0
1p:/~~UfFalt"\.
.;. ",\; t'", CO\
'J'.->>> "&: ",
N~".: ',,~. ,- ~ \:..
" _ t~~~' . :;;...\,'
'~\ - t.,. """" '.',
"0 . '
~i.._ "': ~ ,~3
~V'.. '~"
~ ,( ~',\~;
,', G'.J 'r':~.'- (" 011':'\:
\~: ;'~~ '~"I.~,!: ~ ,.,,'
~()./ i~ i-~,j.{)'
-t..~Q-~;J;'~
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Fax (516) 765-1823
December 10, 1991
RECEIVED
DEe.10 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Donald Grim
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, New York 11935
~"uth"'rI T --.~ rID_"
Re: Site Plan for
Oregon Road Recycling Inc.
Oregon Road, Cutchogue
SCTM ~ 1000-83-4.5
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Grim:
The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town
Planning Board at a meeting held on December 9, 1991.
BE IT RESOLVED That the Southold Town planning Board,
acting pursuant to State Environmental Quality Review Act,
hereby takes lead agent status; makes a determination of
non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration for this
proposal to construct a recycling and salvage facility.
BE IT RESOLVED That the Southold Town Planning Board hereby
grants site plan approval upon fufillment of the following
condition:
Submission of five revised site plans which incorporate
the following: .
1. A ten (10) foot wide vegetative buffer around the
entire perimeter of the side and rear portions of the
property. The landscape plan for the buffer shall
show a double row of staggered evergreen trees. A mix
of the following species shall be used: white pines,
white cedar, red spruce and arborvitae. The trees
shall be between 8 and 10 feet in height and shall be
planted twenty (20) feet apart (on center); except
that trees between the southern edge of the car
storage area and the southernmost end of the property
may be between 5 and'6 feet in height.
,
.
.
2. The following notations:
A. The landscaping in the front yard shall be of
sufficient depth and height to block the view of the
equipment from the road and the neighboring
residences, subject to a one year review by this
Board.
B. In the interest of mitigating noise, additional
buffering shall be installed, as needed, subject to a
one year review by this Board.
C. A means of providing water spray shall be
maintained on the site at all times for the purpose of
dust control on the site and by the crushing equipment.
D. The site shall be operated in accordance with all
conditions of approval as they were set forth by the
Town Board in its resolutions of approval which were
adopted on April 9, 1991, November 26, 1991 and
December 10, 1991) and by the Zoning Board of Appeals
in its decision of September 12, 1991 on Appeal No.
4041. (The Liber and Page numbers of all required
Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions shall be
noted on the site plan.)
3. An approval stamp by the Suffolk County Department of
Health and a permit from the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation for each of all proposed
activities on the site.
A copy of the Negative Declaration is enclosed for your
records.
Please contact Valerie Scopaz if you have any questions
about these resolutions.
Sincerely,
00t~~~/-r.-/t/S
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Encl.
cc:vrJudith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals
Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
.
.
: / :-.:::...' i~
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
.-;':';:;-TL:;rl"'-
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Fax (516) 765-1823
State Environmental Quality Review
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
December 10, 1991
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the
implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State
Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law.
The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has
determined that the proposed action described below will not
have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
Name of Action :
Oregon Road Recycling Corporation
SCTM ll:
1000-83-3-4.5
Location:
South side of Oregon Road, about 572'east of
Cox's Lane, Cutchogue, New York
SEQR Status:
Type I ()
Unlisted (x)
Conditioned Negative Declaration:
Yes ( )
No (x)
Description of Action:
To construct a recycling and salvage facility for the
purpose of crushing and recycling concrete, asphalt and
cars. The proposed uses would be added to the existing
uses which are associated with the company's activities:
excavation and drainage, soil screening, wood chipping and
the offices.
,
.
.
Page 2
Planning Board
December 10, 1991
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
There has been no correspondence received from the
Department of Health Services. Therefore, it is assumed
that there are no comments or objections from that agency.
However, the Corporation will be subject to review by this
agency in order to obtain necessary permits for the
draining, storage and hauling of automobile fluids.
There has neen no correspondence received from. the New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation's Stony
Brook office. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no
comments or objections from that agency.
The Southold Town Board conducted its own environmental
review relative to the application for a permit for a
Recycling and Salvage Facility. The application before the
Planning Board for site plan approval conforms to the terms
of the Conditional Negative Declaration that was issued on
March 1, 1991, and the conditions of the Town Board's
resolutions of approval of April 9, 1991 and November 26,
1991 (copies enclosed).
The Southo1d Town Board of Zoning Appeals issued a
decision on the Special Exception in accordance with the
Town Board's Conditional Negative Declaration. (A copy of
the Zoning Board's decision is enclosed, also.)
The Planning Board finds that the environmental impacts of
the proposed expansion of the existing uses of the site to
include a Recycling and Salvage Facility will be mitigated
satisfactorily by the implementation of the conditions set
forth in the March 1, 1991, conditional Negative
Declaration of the Town Board, the conditions of the Town
Baord's permit (which were set forth on April 9, 1991 and
November 26, 1991) and the conditions of the Special
,
.
.
Page 3
Planning Board
December 10, 1991
Exception issued by the Zoning Board of Appeals (No. 4142)
for the reasons set forth herein:
1. The subject property is presently used for industrial
purposes including excavation and drainage contracting,
wood chipping and material screening. The subject site is
in proximity to (and down gradient of) the Southold Town
Landfill and is zoned, used and located in a predominately
industrial area.
2. The project's operation and impacts have been reviewed
in detail through the preparation of a Full Environmental
Assessment Form Part III which was submitted in connection
with the application.
3. The proposed use is consistent with zoning and land
use in the vicinity of the site.
4. The proposed use has Town Board authorization in
accordance with Chapter 48-1 of the Town Code, and with the
Zoning Board of Appeals' authorization in accordance with
Chapter 100 of the Zoning Code. The use is conditionally
exempt from NYSECL 6 NYCRR PArt 360. The site must be
operated in accordance with Chapter 48-1 of the Town Code,
the Zoning Board of Appeals' decision on Appeal No. 4142,
the Part 360 conditional exemption of the New York State
law, and the conditions imposed by the Planning Board's
conditions of approval of December 9, 1991.
For Further Information:
Contact Person:
Valerie Scopaz
Address:
Southold Town Planning Board
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, N.Y. 11952
Telephone:
(516) 765-1938
Enc1s.
cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Planning Commission
Commissioner Jorling, NYSDEC, Albany
Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Southold Town Building Department
Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals
Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc.
Applicant
, .;
.
.
...
. "
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
RECYCLING AND SALVAGE FACILITY PERMIT
Oregon Road Recycling Corp.
This is to certify that -J..-H..... M;::6rimp of the Town
of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, whose
place of business is at 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue, is
hereby granted a RECYCLING AND SALVAGE FACILITY
PERMIT by the Town Board of the Town of Southold on
April 9, 1991, subject to the conditions specified in the
Town Board's resolution adopted on April 9, 1991, attached
to and made a part of this Permit.
In Witness Whereof I have set my hand and the Seal
of the Town of Southold this 12th day of April, 1991.
~/~ ~~
('/ Judith T. Terry
Town Clerk
Town of Southold
SEA L
.\
.
.
."
,
.
-~--.....
" i" '....~
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
~IARRIAGE OFFICER
., ..../.. n'.' :.'>'~>\
'.. J. q. ,
.,' . '..-..
:,",,. ~\1
.,~, ..~ ';,;-.:: -... ;:~.y
:.. ~ 'fl .._~, ~":J\:lJ
'-:,." ,~"), . .;) ~
~"'_ t:1 I' _ '.J
~'';c:...',.~V
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOllOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRil 9. 1991:
WHEREAS, Jeanne M. Grim. President of Oregon
application dated December 9. 1990. applied to the
Recycling and Salvage Facility Permit at her property
Cutchogue; and
WHEREAS. a Long Environmental Assessment Form was submitted with the
application. and reviewed by Cramer. Voorhis & Associates on behalf of the Town
Board; and
WHEREAS, after due notice the Southold Town Board issued a Conditioned Negative
Declaration with respect to said application, pursuant to Article 8 of the
Environmental Conservation Law. State Environmental Quality Review Act. and
6NYCRR Part 617.6(h). and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold; and
WHEREAS. the Southold Town Board found that the proposed use is compatible with
the site, environmental impacts are expected to be minimal. and mitigation measures
are available to minimize potential environmental effects which will be addressed in
the conditions of granting this permit; and
WHEREAS. the proposed recycling and salvage facility site is presently in active use
by, Oak Street Trucking, Inc.. being used for the purpose of excavation and
drainage contracting. soil screening, and offices, which use is being conducted in
accordance with a Planning Board approved site plan, and Zoning Board of Appeals
authorization. as well as an approved wood chipping operation; and
WHEREAS. the proposed use involves the addition of recycling facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid removal.
crushing or cutting) and shipping off site; now. therefore. be it
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby grants Jeanne M.
Grim.. President of Oregon Road Recycling Corp, a Recycling and Salvage Facility
Permit as requested. for the facility to be located at 11910 Oregon Road. Cutchogue,
New York. subject to the following conditions:
(1) The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage
areas, must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the
Town of Southold Planning Board for review and approval. The Planning Board
should make a' separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the
site plan submitted, in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
(2) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
ma,nu factu rers speci fica tions for the concrete / asphal t crusher, which speci fy
nOise and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared
against applicable standards to ensure compliance, 'and or need for specific
setback, sighting or add.itional mitigation measures, '
Road Recycling Corp... by
Southold Town Board for a
located at 11910 Oregon Road,
:,..
.
.
,.
(3) The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9 :00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance
with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(4) Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 30-days from the date of. acceptance,
in accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
(5) The facility shall be operated in a manner which will eliminate or control
nuisances such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with
the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solia Waste Engineer,
dated December 10, 1990.
(6) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
estimated truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact
upon local roadways.
(7) All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage
facility in an identified area. There shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drums
for storage of toxic or hazardous materials, contained within the building at
anyone time. There shall be no floor drains within the building. Compliance
with these conditions shall be determined by the Building Inspector prior to
the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and subsequent inspections as
necessary.
(8) All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified
Industrial Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in
certain heating equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility,
provided it is conducted in accordance with all applicable New York State and
Suffolk County requirements.
(9) The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with the above conditions. The applicant shall file a covenant to
ensure compliance With this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
*
*
*
(See attached for Condition No. 10 adopted on November 26, 1991.).
~d'~~~
t7----- Judith T. Terry V'
Southold Town Clerk.
April 12, 1991
,
41@
.
. ~
.
.
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Soulhold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 26, 1991:
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby amends
their Resolution No. 23, adopted on April 9, 1991, by adding one further
condition:
"( 1 0) By the filing and compliance of the Covenants and
Restrictions this Recycling and Salvage Facility shall be deemed a permanent
use on the subject premises."
/? _ A',';p ~ ~
~~'i.-/~
Judith T. Terry ~
Southord Town Clerk
November 27, 1991
.
.
.
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
James Dinizio, Jr.
Robert A. Villa
Telephone (516) 765-1809
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF sournOLD
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS
Appl. No. 4041:
Matter of the Application of DONALD AND JEANNE GRIM.
Amendment to Special Exception approval under Appl. No. 3491, in
this Light Industrial (LI) Zone District for permission to
authorize recycling and salvage facility, excavation and
drainage yard (pursuant to Town Board Resolution adopted
April 9, 1991, to be used in conjunction with those uses
conditionally permitted under Special Exception No. 3491
(resolution adopted June 25, 1986) for outside stockpiling of
material and related offices. Location of Property: Lot No. 2
on the Minor Subdivision Map No. 450 of L.B. Glover: 11910
Oregon Road, Cutchogue, NY: County Tax Map District 1000,
Section 83, Block 3, 4.5 (previously part of 4.4). The total
lot area consists of 4.59 acres.
At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on
September 12, 1991, the fOllowing action was taken:
WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony
and documentation submitted into the record concerning this
application; and
WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question as well as the
surrounding zoning districts and land-use districts; and
WHEREAS, after due notice the Southold Town Board issued a
Conditioned Negative Declaration under the N.Y.S. Environmental
Quality Review Act (SEQRA) with respect to this project; and
WHEREAS, this project has received conditional approval for
a Recycling and Salvage Facility Facility from the Southold Town
Boar~ on April 9, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact:
1. By this application, applicant seeks a Special
Exception under the fOllowing provisions of the zoning code:
Article XIV, Sections 100-141(A & B), Article XIV, Section
100-140B, applicable to this parcel zoned "LI" Light Industrial
and containing 4.59 acres.
. .?- Appl. No. .!i~
...tter of DONALD AND JEANNE GRIM
Decision Rendered September 12, 1991
.
~
2. Submitted under this application for consideration are
site plan maps dated February 1, 1990, revised July 2, 1991,
prepared by peconic Surveyors, P.C. depicting: (a) the
proposed outside area for drainage, stockpiling areas and 'other
paved areas, portable screening plant, portable commercial wood
chipper, proposed concrete crusher, proposed and existing septic
systems, proposed building and inside loading ramp, roofed
drain, cardinale scale and its housing, drywells, existing water
lines, berm areas, proposed 5' high identification ground sign,
street trees, slatted fence borders (all to meet Planning Board
requirements), grade elevations, leeching pools, parking areas,
lighting information, etc.
3. It is noted for the record that:
(a) the existing uses and buildings, together with
all outside facility areas, also shown on this site plan amended
JUly 2, 1991, have received conditional approval from the Board
of Appeals, via Special Exception dated June 25, 1986 under
Appl. No. 3491, and via Variance (for front yard setback of
two-story building) on March 5, 1987 under Appl. No. 3595.
(b) the subject premises is located in the Hamlet of
Cutchogue along the south side of Oregon Road (frontage 362.05
ft.) and is known and referred to as Lot No.4 of the Minor
Subdivision of L.B. Glover (Planning Board ~450).
4. The premises is adjacent on three sides by other
industrial zoned properties. To the south is the Southold Town
landfill and disposal areas. To the north are properties
located in the Agricultural-Conservation Zone District, with
existing dwellings.
5. It is the position of this Board that:
(a) the proposed recylcing and salvage facilities,
with related amenities, will be in conformity with the Zoning
Code as applies to this Light Industrial Zone District.
(b) the amount of land applied to this proposed use
is more than adequate and will lend to the efficient and safe
circulation for vehicles and pedestrians as well as
maneuverability of equipment and vehicles on the site, and
appropriate located customer and employee parking areas.
.
(c) extended screening will be provided to reduce
possible noise impacts, and new landscaped areas will be
provided {to meet Planning Board requirements as well};
(d) all runoff and discharge will be into drywells
and leeching basins;
,
,
".
,
~
. ~
J - APPl. No. 4041.
,a~ of DONALD AND JEANNE GRIM
.ision Rendered September 12, 1991
.
~
--
?
prohibited under the zoning regulations from continuing in
conjunction with the uses permitted hereunder;
-----___. <1)
~'"
/
---* ---
6. In considering this application, the Board also finds
and determines: (a) these uses will not alter the essential
character of this industrial area and are in harmony with and
the general purposes and intent of zoning; (b) that these uses
will not be harmful aesthetically or be substantially adverse to
public health, welfare, safety, convenience, or order.of the
town; (c) that the proposed uses will not prevent the orderly
and reasonable use of adjacent properties or of properties in
adjacent use districts; (d) the uses are in harmony with and
will promote the general purposes and intent of zoning. The
Board has also, among other considerations, considered
subsections (A) through (P) of Article XXVI, Section 100-264 of
the Southold Town Zoning Code.
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by
Mr. Villa, it was
RESOLVED, to GRANT a Special Exception, for a proposed
Recylcing and Salvage Facilities, with related amenities, in
conjunction with the existing authorized uses, SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. Proposed crusher to be located 150 feet (approximately)
from the rear property line, centered, with appropriate noise
screening that may be required by this Board once the crusher is
placed in operation.
2. Hours of operation, as agreed by the applicant, for the
proposed crusher shall be limited to 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday
through Friday.
3. Chipper not to be used on Saturday or Sunday, as agreed.
4. Piling of waste from cars or other vehicles (i.e.
seats, etc.), when and if stored, shall be of a temporary time
period and shall not be piled at a height of more than 20 feet,
with a location 50 feet or more from the property liners).
5. No burying of materials shall be authorized without
valid N.Y.S. D.E.C. permits and other agencies having
jurisdiction thereof.
6. Conditions of prior Appl. No. 3595 rendered March 5,
1987 (Grim) and Appl. No. 3491 rendered June 25, 1986 (Grim)
must be complied w~th.
7. The conditions and limitations under this Special
Exception must be complied with at all times, as well as during
,
.'
4 - Appl. No. 4!1~
er of DONALD AND JEANNE GRIM
ision Rendered September 12, 1991
e(l
issuance of state, county and other agency permits or
approvals.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:
Goehringer, Dinizio and Villa.
adopted.
Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen,
This resolution was duly
*
* *
...--7"---' 7
~,~2~,
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
V
lk
.
.
,
.
"T1
r
m
0-
., 0- Z"'C
_ to-
.. =to Ol
to Ol::l
00....::l
::l <Il -'-.
< ::l
;:o::l<lltO
O~
OlOlOtll
o.-<IlO
n Ol
iij.,
.,0.
Ol
....~
C)" -f
::l 0
:E
::l
~
;:0
<Il
n
-<
n
::l
to
\
"'
?~
. CXft/J-o/J7
11429PG429.
OECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS
THIS DECLARATION,
made the I~ay of January, 1992, by
JEANNE M.
GRIM, President of the Oregon Road Recycling, Inc.. with :!'usiness
address of 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue, New York 11935, and Donald J.
Grim, declarants. .:re4"I\e,. fY'l 0r,'"" <'10 //'Tloo-...;.~~;2d/~L"'r--<:7
~ ~\-\\'\ 'J-. WHEREAS, declarants are the owners of certain real property situated in
~ Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County. New York with with tax map
designation 1000-83-3- p/o 4.004 and more particularly described below:
\000
~CO
03CD
~5
"'-\\ I
,,^ C\J
i'.~
BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Oregon Road
(North Road) distant 572.53 feet measured southerly along
the easterly side of Oregon Road from the intersection
formed by the easterly side of Oregon Road with the
southerly side of Cox's Lane; running thence South 590 55'
31" East 513.96 feet; running thence South 300 12' 50"
West, 345.63 feet to land now or formerly of Zuhoski;
running thence North 560 48' 26" West and along said last
mentioned land, 361.88 feet to a point; running thence
North 570 24' 30" West and continuing along said land now
or formerly of Zuhoski, 337.24 feet to a monument set in
the easterly side of Oregon Road; and running thence
North 600 49' 44" East and along the easterly side of
Oregon Road, 362.06 feet to the point or place of
BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting by the Town Board
of the Town of. Southold of a Recycling and Salvage Facility Permit to
Declarant Oregon Road Recycling, Inc.. on April 9, 1991 (by Town Board
resolution adopted on April 9, 1991, with conditions). and amended on
December 10, 1991, the Town Board of the Town of Southold has required
that the within declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerks Office
and,
WHEREAS, declarants have considered the foregoing demand and
determined that same will be in the best interest of the declarants and
subsequent owners of said parcel.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE DECLARANTS WITNESSETH:
1. The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the
hours of 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M.. Monday through Friday.
2. Declarants agree to allow access to the site and facilities by Town
Officials and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose
of insuring compliance with the conditions contained in the Town Board's
resolution adopted on April 9, 1991, a certified copy of which is annexed
hereto. /'
~
.
't
11429P~4t
.
3. Declarants, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above
expressed, does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that
the said premises herein described shall hereinafter be subject to the
above-stated covenants which shall run with the land and be binding upon all
purchases and holders of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal
representatives, distributees, successors, assigns and that, these covenants
and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the
premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Town Board of the
Town of Southold or its successor body, after a public hearing. Adjoining
property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing, but their
consent to such modifications shall not be required.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the declarants have hereunto set their hand and
seal the day and year above written.
OREGON ROAD RECYCLING, INC.
BY: ~ {)~.
J~~NE M. GR 1M, President
~f'r1.~
Jt):;OY'K ~
DONALD J. G~
STATE OF NEW YORK)
ss:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
On the /"1 day of rJ:..~~7, 19(;, before me personally came JEANNE M.
GRIM, to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that she
resides at 280 Den-kel Lane, Cutchogue, New York 11935; that she is the
President of the Oregon Road Recycling, Inc., the corporation described in and
which executed the foregoing instrument; that she knows the seal of said
corporation that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate that
it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of sai corporati that
she signed her name thereto by like order.
MOlY Jon~ lbrvoth
t-btary ?t,;j!ic. S:',";'l d ~QW York
~J:J. I;:" :'j;'~:;
Quali;i~':;; in :;ur:c!l; Coun1~~
COil'..~Oji ~pir:Js MoJr. 6, lY-~
STATE OF NEW YORK)
ss:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
Before me personally came JEANNE M. GRIM and DONALD J. GRIM to me
known to be the individuals described in and who executed the regoing
instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same.
(':','):-1 ~ ';;". <:~'l
Hotc;y Pti~aC, 5: " of '.few York
rj. .tl~:::-'d6
OualiGcd in S::f;c.!~ Calmly 0.
Comrission &pires Mor. 6, 19.e..'
...
'"
11429PG43_
,
,
,
"
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
I, .
j,..
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Soulhold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTIlOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN' BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 10, 1991:
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby amends
their resolution no. 23, adopted on April 9, 1991, to reflect the issuance of
a Recycling and Salvage Facility Permit to Oreqon Road Recyclinq Corp.
rather than to Jeanne M. Grim, President of Oregon Road Recycling Corp.;
and be it further
RESOLVED that condition (3) of said permit, with respect to the
concrete/asphalt crusher, shall only be operated between the hours of 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday throuqh Friday. The applicant shall file a
covenant to ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the
Town Attorney."
/..J/.J~~
~~ Terry (/
Southold Town Clerk
December 11, 1991
,
11429Ph432
Jf. +- jL
2x,-,-~~J7 7cr-u-~ ~
M(.k..-->-~-f
(~,~U (Vlll/7'7(
- -,.
',,\
.
,
';1.\-\)1
," 0--""
---
-" ----
~'.';,.-
- ~.,
;;:
~:
~
. 'I ~ r-
t'..j'
. - ..-~.
-.-
~
,J
.-
.
~
. ..,....
'.r;
~
~
If
~
'V
./
..
./
,
\
.
T./3 - T/I-
b40/~:
'f21~.,t:Jt:t .
TO: JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK
RECEIVED
DEC, 3 1991
FROM: DONALD GRIM
$outholri T ~..... r,,",,,,
RE: SCTM # 1000-84-1-P/O 25
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1991
THE ABOVE MENTIONED PARCEL IN CONCERN IS A WEEDED SITE
INFESTED WITH PAPERS, GARBAGE AND DEBRIS. WE ARE LOOKING TO
CLEAN UP THE SITE BY SCRAPING UP THE WEEDS AND THE DEBRIS AND
REMOVING IT FROM THE SITE. THEN THE SITE WILL BE PLOWED AND
A COVER CROP OF RYE WILL BE PLANTED.
SINCE IT IS TOO LATE INTO THE YEAR TO PLANT ANY KIND OF
COVER NOW, I WILL FINISH THE CLEANUP IN THE SPRING.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT
ME AT (516)-734-7078 OR 734-7248.
~~~
DONALD GRIM
.,
. .:.,
. - (
. .
~fFOl.r t!
4(:(1)
~Q.. . 'i!o~:'t-
({+i'
-:sr(J)
,_d.-
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOTI L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York I 1971
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Fax (516) 765-1823
FROM:
Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 7J?!'r,lJ;
RECEIVED
NOV 1 4 1991
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Sou"'old T ow'! de~
RE: Soil Excavation at N/W/c CR 48 and Cox's Lane,
Cutchogue, N.Y.
SCTM # 1000-84-1-25.2
DATE:
November 14, 1991
The above-noted site is the subject of a change of zone
application by Thomas Thompson and James L. Gray. A scoping
session was held on this application in October of 1990. Since
the Town Board has not completed its environmental review of the
project, it should be made aware of a change that has been made
to the subject property.
Last month the topsoil on this property was scraped and
piled to one side, as shown in the two attached photographs.
The practice of scraping topsoil typically leads to its removal
from the site. It would seem that this action is in violation
of the intent of the Town's Code. There are no plans on file in
either the Planning Board or the Building offices to develop
this property, which is zoned Agricultural-Conservation. In
essence, removing the topsoil will destroy the value of this
property for agricultural uses.
Further, the fact that the scraping has occurred in the
fall is particularly troublesome because this is the end of the
growing season. There will be no ground cover to keep the
remaining soil from blowing away this winter and early spring.
I respectfully request that appropriate enforcement action
be taken to have the property ownerlsl return the topsoil and
reseed it promptly.
cc: .Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector
Vincent Wieczoreck, Ordinance Inspector
Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney
..
.~
.
,-
r
.
.
',,\
--
.
~
(~;CT~'t3e/< Sir i'77(
d/I/le..- c2l<.. 'IS 1 Q::J-I"'5 Lk
/..OUI</NC, Y/f..SI
=:iJ.{'::;-'::'-"'i
. ~ - ,
'::u'7'Z'.J!
.
(/C-i-,')/3E/z-:"
31 /;;~;../
~~I"-
<-;, ->I~
.:.:...' .:~/'~rI/.
/Y/t.,/G C',,() <-1::( " (ZX:" ",-i
~~t/,,ClrVy yV~~ T-
--
p
-,
--
...............---
,.
....
.
. ,
~
.
P
RECYCLING &
MANUFACTURING, INC.
August 15, 1991
Ms. ValerieScopaz
Town Planner
Planning Board Office
Town of Southold
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Dear Ms. Scopaz:
I&~ . '1~1/1
~~~
<
In answer to your letter of August 12, 1991 regarding
the noise level data on the Excel Recycling plants, we have
contacted the manufacturer of the electric motors used on
these units, TECO, Inc. for the following data:
Excel 2500 Plant
Excel 2200 Plant
300HP Motor
83 DBA at 1 Meter
200HP Motor
84 DBA at 1 Meter
TECO's company policy provides for verbal information
only until such a time a purchase order is issued requiring
noise level data. If required, this information will be
documented for oregon Recycling, Inc. should they purchase an
Excel plant.
~~
Project Coordinator
Office - (806) 335-3737
',' -;.~.~:::- I::', '-0~;,- ~:._.- ',:
:, :::} ..~_1~.,.~~?ct2~. ,; ,:;
""2
.' '.;- ~ \ :::
!
'-'-<.....~_. .,....
U.S. 1-800-858-4002
FAX # 806-335-3949
.
,[.LCI_~
;>~.:::11 '(I'..",,~
" ,'" ',' '-'''-I ')' ,
'" ..,..\~. .. '.' -,
:/~vl-''''' ...."?~"
/.",.." }', '.7-1
(, ....~J .. .,- ~,-",.;,....o-';,
., ...,..... ~ ,-"_ 'C"'. _ ........ '-
~; ;.- .. ....,. """'~".. .-
.1= ~',"'>" :e
,',.-- . ~
J;:j) ..,' :
\,"";,r", ,'''..,~ ~__\'
'-"""', "": ......
_- _ _.4, _,_., __~._ A
~'JJ.' ',",Y,
~(, ,;t,
_r__~'rl'
~ ~//9-
!..;~ (t.....c..
.
\ .-
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
George Ritchie Latham. Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCOlT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Fax (516) 765-1823
hfqsr /3.1
199/
-~C"l\tp"\
.,. .. >t-';:U
'".., ., 99
iI_I) '~1!' 1
RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request
'~()fJlhoi~ T....._ r'.",~
Dear Reviewer:
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8
(State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead
agency; and
3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed
Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response.
Project Name:
t:JfEaf:)#' ~.::oA2) ~El:V(UN1I'<$
C.U7C/./OGcE' ~O?~ -~~3- 4.5'""
Requested Action:
715 7)eYc"1.OP A d<w~ ~::;;; =^'~
-;:;,./~~~~~"' I ~ ~
SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I
("X) Un'listed
Contact Person: YI/t.e'.e.f6r S{:.()/JIf?____
(516)-765-1938
.
.
The lead agency will determine the
impact statement (EIS) on this project.
the date of this letter, please respond
have an interest in being lead agency.
need for an environmental
Within thirty (30) days of
in writing whether or not you
Planning Board Position:
\
(~) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
( Other. (See comments below).
Comments:
..5t-~ tt#llded ~d/I-- ~ ~
Please feel free to contact this office for further information.
Sincerely,
~.
cc:
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Board of Appeals
Daara of TrH6tcc3
Building' Department
Southold Town Board ../'
Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services
NYSDEC - Stony Brook
NYSDEC - Albany
e.G. Bar:- nf Pllhli(" ~~Qrk~
U..3. hJ.JI~Y Carp sf gn~iBce:.L(j
N.Y..3. Dc~t. gf Trafi~p01Lation
* Maps are enclosed for your.!cview
Coordinating agencies
;
,\
,
r
"
/-0
RI( ./
v$ ./
~ -t="yf
~ - I(.E'
\ ,.,
CONDITIONED
Negative Declaration
Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
t
Lead Agency:
Address:
Southold Town Board
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Project # (if any)
Date: March 1, 1991
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 (and local law #) - 1978 if any) of the imple-
menting regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environ-
mental Conservation Law.
The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a
significant effect on the environment. provided the conditions are met.
Tille of Action:
Jeanne M. Grim - Oregon Road recycling Corp.
Authorization of Recycling and Salvage Facility
SCTM#l 000-083-3-4.5
SEQR Status:
Type I
Unlisted
o
~
Description of Action: The proposed recycling and salvage facility site is
presently in active use by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., for the purpose
of excavation and drainage contracting, soil screening, and offices.
This use is being conducted in accordance with a Planning Board
approved site plan, and Zoning Board of Appeals authorization. In
addition, the facility is already approved for a wood chipping operation.
The proposed use involves the addition of recycling facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid
removal, crushing or cutting) and shipping off the site.
Location: (Include the name of the county and town. A location map of appropriate scale is also
recommended) 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold,
Suffolk County, New York.
(AII.Jl.:h additional p.Jqes as needed)
.'
,(
~.
'c
. -
SEQR Conditional Negative Declaration
Page 2
.
. ,
Reasons Supporting This Determination: Recognizing that the proposed use is
compatible with the site, environmental impacts are expected to be minimal,
and that mitigation measures are available to minimize potential environmental
effects, provided the following conditions are adhered to:
(See attached list of conditions (ll through (9)
For Further Information:
Contact Person:
Address:
Phone No,:
Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, N. Y. 11971
(516) 765-1801
Copies of this Notice Sent to:
Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York
12233-0001
Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation -Region I.
Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be princi-
pally located - Supervisor Scott L. Harris.
Main office and appropriate regional office (if any) of lead agency_
Applicant (if any) Jeanne M. Grim
All other involved agencies (if any)
Environmental Notice Bulletin
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Building Department
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Southold Town Attorney
Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
NOTE: Negative Declarahons for Unlisted Actions need not be filed with DEe or any other agency (see 617 .7(a)).
"
~L
~ ()
~
, "
Conditions imposed with respect to the issuance, by the Town Board of the Town of
Southold, of a Conditioned Negative Declaration with respect to the application of
Jeanne Grim for a Recycling and Salvage Facility:
(1) The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage
areas, must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the
Town of Southold Planning Board ,for review and approval. The Planning Board
should make a separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the site
plan submitted, in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
(2) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
manufacturers specifications for the concrete/asphalt crusher, which specify
noise and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared
against applicable standards to ensure compliance, and or need for specific
setback, sighting or additional mitigation measures.
(3) The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9:00
a. m. and 5: 00 p. m. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance
with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(4) Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 30-days from the date of acceptance, in
accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
(5) The facility shall be operated in a manner which will eliminate or control
nuisances such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with
the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste Engineer,
dated December 10, 1990.
(6) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
estimated truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact
upon loca I roadways.
(7) All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage
facility in an identified area. There shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drums
for storage of toxic or hazardous materials, contained within the building at any
one time. There shall be no floor drains within the building. Compliance with
these conditions shall be determined by the Building Inspector prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and subsequent inspections as necessary.
(8) All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified
Industrial Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in certain
heating equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility, provided
it is conducted in accordance with all applicable New York State and Suffolk
County requirements.
(9) The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with the above conditions. The applicant shall file a covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
*
*
*
*
..
.-
t
,
i . . d' .
~~')
. .
-, '14.16.2 (2/87)-7c
617.21
Appendix A
Slate Environmental Quality Review .
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL: ASSESSMENT FORM'
SEa
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderly manner, whether a projec
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequen'
Iy, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determin
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically e.xpert in environmenti'
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge ip one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectin
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatie'
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or actior
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and J:
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or actio'n. It provide
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important. .
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE_ Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 oPart 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magi tude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
o A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore. is one which wiil not
have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
o B. Although the projec~ could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.'
o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.. .
, A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
hr
X~t L!("~r
Name of Action t
Name of Lead Agency
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of ResponSIble Officer
Signature of ResponSIble Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(1t different from responsible officer)
Date
1
.,
~( . ~ t
. PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION
.... .
, ,
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action propose~ may have a significant effe,
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be conSider.
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition.
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol,
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specii
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION ~ '--:::)
D--eccV'\ """"c!. 'K~J:~ C !,y\(l c.OY
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Stre_~ess. Munjcipallty~ County)
I g I 0 'v-e 'c... ~c1. (~+rJ-,,- ........
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPON
.::::rea Yl r')e., """
ADDREss-..... --..,_
+-'0 . 1:)0')( 500
CITY/PO /V I
L...<...A..:1L-hcA<-01....
NAME _~~ OWNER (If dlfferenjl....
~e.c1..V)"'c.. (: "'-I~
AODAE~S_ ~
.. 'r'::lO-X ::DC>
CITY/PO . , ... I ZIP CODE
c:..,^---+U'1 I I '15 '-)-
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION '.. J
- -K-C::" c)lY'&l 'fic...d'4j -t= \'-'a.v-.dk v,u.vd-,...-ou'S l^"o~ -J--o v-e..(U~
0--1 ~~--sh---aLv-r- Iv-.+V -1-v.......,y> i a.ndh II ({..,.-:-~k.1 t<.'Sph...(+ i ~"'5:
----I'h-e. W".:'S I ) -VN.-h>-.-{ "'I"C~.~ c....k...'l 'r-./<nA.-ld i, \.<!<!.... -te ~\-A-vl- Y"U.<...fU I~ .
<'1-1. ;, hru.<;.Vl, 61'.-\'('-/ I ., , r'>___ .11 y-~\vtd a. /'lJIcs
.J \I'>'p-, ~ 0-':. "'Dtl..... "-':. "'T"" ~ v--JL.. ~PP""-O-V<l_IS \Y"~ CL l) .
~p~~ .
OV"\c,,-- t d
r' ..
~ -r , Vl""-
<:"~
,.;) Ll F fbI--. 'l<
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
(::)!ld 75~ - '7u7'g
/IQ3S-
Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both )!eve loped and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: DUrban rnIndustrial DCommercial OResidential (suburban)
OForest OAgriculture OOther
';,0
ORural (non-farn-
2. Total acreage of project area:
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural)
Forested
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECl)
Water Surface Area
Un vegetated (Rock, ~arth or fill)
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces'
Other (Indicate type) :")e.<Z.. approyc-c\ 'S; k i~lc,,,,
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? <;l1.nri '1 kUCl.""
a. Soil drainage: BWell drained 10D % of site DModerately well drained
OPoorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involveldT how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY
land Classification System? f" _/\ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).
I
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? DYes IBNo
a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet)
acres.
PRESENTl Y
AFTER COMPLETION
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
~b of site
2
\ .
." . . i
. '. . ".
.5. 'Approximate percentage of proposed.project sit~Y:ith slopes:
. ~l
&fu"10% 0
%
010-15%
r'%
%
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or co~o in a building,
Registers of Historic Places? DYes lS<!No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks?
--
8. What is the depth of the water table? 70 - g..., (ir(!eetl .
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area?
11, Does project site c~tain 'any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
DYes W'No According to
Identify each species
015% or greater
site, or district, listed
on the State or the National
DYes
!!'l'N'0
~o
DYes
mr:(o
12. Are there any uniqu<yor unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
DYes BNo Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
DYes S'No If yes, explain
14.
Does the present si}i< include scenic views known to be important to the community?
DYes SNo. J J
Streams within or contiguous to project area: YA - ~
,
a. .Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
15.
16. lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name
Is the site served by -existing p~blic utilities? ~s DNo
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
Is the site located in an agricultural pstrict certified pursuant
Section 303 and 304? DYes l5'No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous.;o a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECl, and 6 NYCRR 6171 DYes l!l'No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes ~
/"iA-~6"""':
b. Size (In acres)
;E; I ~ C,""""'" Co.
~s DNo.......-
DYes (!fNo
to Agriculture and Markets law, Article 25-AA,
17.
18.
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (till in dimensions as appropri~te) ___
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or con;rolleyy project sponsor .2> acres. .
b. Project acreage to be developed: Lf,. .c;-. acres initially; , S acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain unden'oped ;.)0 nc- acres.
d. length of project, i.n miles: N,[f.l- (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing /0 ; proposed ;
g. Maximum vehicular trips .generated per hour .5 (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: Hilt
One Family Two Family
Initially
Ultimately
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure .~S- height; 10
;. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?
~/fr
%;
Multiple Family
Condominium
width; (-n
. it,;). \ft.
length.
.'
3
.... < ! ..... t ,( .'.~
.2.' How ~uch natural material (i.e.. .rock. <!.arth, "ltc) w!~ rem~d from the site? .t:J/!l-- tons/cubic yards
3. W,ll dISturbed areas be reclaImed? DYes' ~o- .' mN/A
a. If yes, for what intend.": purpose is the site being reclaimed? .
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes ~
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes ~
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres.
5. Will any mature Jerest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
DYes B"No _
~. If single phase project: Anticipated period of iconstruction 0 months, (including demolition).
/ --.::wo . U.A- ~J.vK-
7. If multi-phased: NIPr t:J \.J
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).-
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? DYes
a. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes f ~
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction f./r ; after project is complete
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project t-j/-
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DYes ~ If yes. explain
year. (including demolition].
year.
DNo
~M-
/
~
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes
a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount'
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes ~ Type
'14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain?
1&. Will the project generate solid waste? DYes ~
a. If yes. what is the amount per month tons
b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes DNo
c_ If yes. give name location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
e. If Yes, explain . ,I.. .h-..~ ~'" v!\"cl s' "'- "'-cd I VI <S
~b(..ls6IlSe..vvu:c-~bu......,<!..d l""'a. .......i.!lko\l.(.(~_ h(p.~"""\1'-"-
t PE<' ' . . .
17. Will the project involve the dISposal of solid waste?
a, If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal?
b. II yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes GN;;
19. Will project routinely 'produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes
20. Will project produ~e op~rating noise exceeding the local ambien:;oise levels?
21. Will project result In an mcrease m energy use? DYes ruNo
If yes, indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity
23. Total anticipated water usage per day C:o- gallons/day.
24. Does project involve local, State or Federal funding? DYes
If Yes, explain
DYes
~ tJ/1l
DYes
No
DNo
DYes
~
G',.>;
tons/month.
~
DYes
cmC
.-S- gallons/minute. ,?V ~ vcJ::Ji. tvetA I
BNo No/- 4,,1 <....1M- ~Se.Jd-
4
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision?
If Yes, indicate decision required:
Dzoning amendment Dzoning variance Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision
Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? L..I. l..r:t h+-'4:vd(.A.$+v-, a...(
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
-4.<) 0.(; v(-' <'",
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? V~,C\\~ ~-Ia.v--
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
4. a..~ So .
.
. .
. ,
,(
. . .
\. .' .25. Approvals Required:
.
,
...;.:....
. .
City, Town, Village Board
City, Town. Village Planning Board
City, Town Zoning Board
City, Countv Health Department
Other local Agencies
Other Regional Agencies
State Agencies
Federal Agencies
rn{.;s DNo
DYes 9No
DYes QI<lo
DYes 000
DYes !:!No
DYes QNo
~s DNo
DYes. goNo
't "
Type
~vV"" "".boa. vd
Submittal
Date
~
VV'~ Vi'" :;<~,<<s -r ~ a..ppt<>nt-l -0 Soh-II
DYes
~
Dsite plan
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? .es 01\
7. What are the predominant land users) and zoning classifications within a 'A mile radius of proposed action?
L.-:C, -+v 6-S+- G..J<O~+ ~ SC~+ltl "'-.e. "'-0"''', 'S..\.. +.. ~~
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within
9. If the proposed. action is the subdivision of land. how ,?,ny lots are proposed?
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~
Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts?
Will the proposed actigP create iJ demand for any community provided services (recreation.
fire protection)? Mes DNo MYe., ?yv-le..e-nc.,~ ,
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? l2lYes (..';0
Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels?
. a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes
10.
11.
12.
.
aJ'A mile?
VA
es ON
DYes ~
education, POliCE
DYes ONe
EI'N 0 .
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any advers,
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate 0
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
^"'k"1"' N'1.$"O'- &<,,~
Signatur~. . /l,noJ- . ~ Title --:?Y'(Sld~
If the acllon"5 on the Coastal f-rea, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
..ith this assessment.
Date
I~W10
5
-
.
.
. .
. .
/.
!!
CD
C')="r
., Ojjj"tll
~r =:l 01
. C'):!. a.
....tll:l>
tll:l101O
01 tll tll
':l" o:l:l
:l !!!. 0 n
tll 01,,<
. .,
a.
::0
tll
n
"<
!2.
:l
10
'\
-t
o
:IE
:l
.
.
HARVEY A. ARNOFF
Town Attorney
SCOTT L. HARRIS
Supervisor
MATTHEW G. KIERNAN
Assistant Town Attorney
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
April 17, 1991
Patricia B. Adduci. Commissioner
State of New York Department of Motor Vehicles
Division of Vehicle Safety
The Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller
Empire State Plaza
Albany, New York 12228
Re: Application of Oregon Road Recycling Corporation
and Donald Grim - Tax Map No. 1000-83-03-4.4
Dear Ms. Adduci:
Please be advised, that on April 9, 1991, the Town Board of the Town of
Southold approved a recycling permit for Donald Grim. The use involves a
concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling with shipping off site. You will also
note that the car recycling included fluid removal, crushing or cutting. In
granting the permit, the Town Board did not prohibit dismantling of automobiles
and other vehicles and, therefore it would appear that dismantling is permitted in
this instance. Enclosed is a certified copy of the Town Board's resolution.
Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions concerning this
matter.
i{jL""'c K ~~
Matthew G. Kiernan
Assistant Town Attorney
MGK:mls
Enclosure
cc: Donald Grim
"......
.
.
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VIT AL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
Town HaIl, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
April 16, 1991
From:
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Southold Town Building Department
Judith Terry, Town Clerk r
Jeanne M. Grim - Recycling and Salvage Facility Permit
To:
Re:
Transmitted herewith is the certified resolution of the Southold Town
Board, adopted on April 9, 1991, granting Jeanne M. Grim a Recycling &
Salvage Facility Permit at her property located at 11910 Oregon Road,
Cutchogue, subject to certain conditions which are specified in detail in
the resolution.
.
rne
7.6
TIi
t::ID.,....i 1 2..,
19'91
SOIJthclld Pla'(w',il'"rg 8clar'd Offic'E'
bcn..rthold Tc:rWY'1 Boar'o
TCtwn Hall
EI30'35 }'rla 1 -r! f~'Oi.::'Id
Southcdd.. hj" 'y'.
RfOIV!D
APR :3 1991
SclIlIIIOId r....... (W
11 '37 1
Re; Iter" # 1 of the attached letter dated 1/1/91
to the Planninq Board/Town Board
SCTM #1000-83-3-4.~)
Dear' 8i reel'" j"!adam:
1 am writing thlS letter to clarify #1 of the attached
let ten".
1 have .received a builc.ii"'H] pe.,.....rnit fo'('" the office.
If the economy oicks un I intend to start building the
office by mid to late summer of this year.
If you have any Questions regarding this matter,
YCIU may cCI'("rt:ac.t DO'("rald G.,.....irn ('734-707&~ '''i'3l~-...'I'014" 0.,.... 734,,-
724B.. )
I".
Grir
ATTi4CH~lEI'.rr
.
,
.
.
.
Januar-y 1, lS.i91
Southold Planning Board Office
Bouthold Town Board
Town H",ll
~:53095 Mai n Roa.d
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Re: Application of Oregon Road Recycling Corporation to
operate recycling and salvage facility
BCTM #1000-83-3-4.5
Dear Sir or Madam:
In response to the attached letter dated December 19,
1990 addressed to the Southold Town Board regarding the "boye
mentioned, below are answers to the questions addressed irl
t.he let.ter'.
#1. At t.his t.ime the office building is not. up yet. and
I am not sure when it. will be built. When it is
built. it will not. be used by any secondary business
unless approyal is received by the Z.B.A.
#2. To be answered by t.own board member Tom Wickham.
#3a. Yes it will be continued.
#3b. At. this t.ime the proposed use will be an accessory
Llse. The proposed use will remain an accessory
until it becomes financially stable and can operate
Dn i t Si own.
If vou have any further questions regarding this matter,
you may contact Donald Gr"im (734-7078, 734-7014, or 734-
7248. )
!"~.)j. ncer'el y yours,
,Jeanne M. Grim
.
.
:~~!;~~~~~~~~~i~~i~~!!~~~~~!III~,f~~:::~!::!~~~~~~~iilIlt~~~~~;;~~~~~~:I:III;;;lllllllllllli~:I::!;::::;,
~~:~;~:~::~:IIII~:~:~:~:~:~::::~::.::::::~:~::t:~::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~,r-,~:~'~li;'illll~llil~~~~~;t:t-i~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII""1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIillllll!ll!1\\\111111
ESCRIPTION:m:Recycling & salvage fac used for excavation & drainage
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: . . . .
;;'OA TE RECE I VED : ::"";::::;::,,::::::'::"::';::::::::;::::';::::::';::::::;;::;::::::'::::::::'::::::;::::;'::;';'::::::::::;::::'::'::",'::::;'::::::'::::::
m___ii:I\\\!!~~llllj~il~~~~~~i!i!r!~llliilllll\~li~!il~lllllllil!I~I!lllllll!I!!ili
g::::':;.:.....g::;.'N 0 r mal V 0 i d '.......'...'.;':';g:g mmmm;m:u:um:u::m:m:u:um:UHmmmmmmmm::UH:::mmmm:mmmmmmmmm:mmmmm:u:m::mmHHmmm::UHHH;
n:UH;Hm:m:Cond i t i oned::::m:mHmH:::::::mH !!!!!!!!!!:!::::::::::::::::!m!m!mmm!mm!m:::::!!;:!:::!!:!!::::!m::::::m::m!m!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!m!m!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:::::!:mmm::!::::::::mmm::u:::mmm:
:mn::::::::((((!nRe sc in d e d ::::::::nnm((m((:(iiimm((m(:(! mmmg::g.mm:mmm:mmmmm:m::;::ggg;:::.g:.:..g..:g..::m:mgg;::;mm:ggggggg;m:::m::mmmmggg;m!;!!mmmmmmmm:::m::::m:g:'
IMPORTANT
>>
F:i.::Le Number:
N::J..-473800-008::J..::J..
Use the above number in all
correspondence about this action!
To the Lead Agency:
The above information confirms that filings on the described
Negative Declaration were officiallY received by, and entered in the
SEOR Repository on the daters) shown in the box headed DATE RECEIVED
above. The date and time in the second line show when this
document was printed. Please check the information above carefully.
For corrections or questions contact Charles Lockrow, (518)457-2224,
or write to:
SEOR Repository
NYSDEC Division of Regulatory Affairs
50 Wolf Road, Room 514
Albany, NY 12233
IfaMD
MAR 2 1 1991
Town of SOUTHOLD
Town Board
53095 Main Road-P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
So.olIonI.f .~... .."...,
~
,.
.
.
CONDITIONEl>
Negative Declaration
Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
Lead Agency: Southold Town Board
Address: Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Project # (if any)
Date: March 1, 1991
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 (and local law # 3 - 1978 if any) of the imple-
menting regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environ-
mental Conservation Law_
The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a
significant effect on the environment. provided the conditions are met.
Title of Action:
Jeanne M. Grim - Oregon Road recycling Corp.
Authorization of Recycling and Salvage Facility
SCTM#1 000-083-3-4.5
SEQR Status:
Type I
Unlisted
o
~
Description of Action: The proposed recycling and salvage facility site is
presently in active use by Oak Street Trucking, Inc., for the purpose
of excavation and drainage contracting, soil screening, and offices.
This use is being conducted in accordance with a Planning Board
approved site plan, and Zoning Board of Appeals authorization. In
addition, the facility is already approved for a wood chipping operation.
The proposed use involves the addition of recycling facilities which will
ultimately include a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling (fluid
removal, crushing or cutting) and shipping off the site.
Location: (Include the name of the county and town. A location map of appropriate scale is also
recommended) 11910 Oregon Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold,
Suffolk County, New York.
(Attach additional pages as needed)
J
,.
.
.
SEQR Conditional Negative Declaration
Page 2
Reasons Supporting This Determination: Recognizing that the proposed use is
compatible with the site, environmental impacts are expected to be minimal,
and that mitigation measures are available to minimize potential environmental
effects, provided the following conditions are adhered to:
(See attached list of conditions (1) through (9)
For Further Information:
Contact Person:
Address:
Phone No.:
Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1801
Copies of this Notice Sent to:
Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York
12233-0001
Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation -Region I.
Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be princi-
pally located - Supervisor Scott L. Harris.
Main office and appropriate regional office (if any) of lead agency.
Applicant (if any) Jeanne M. Grim
All other involved agencies (if any)
Environmental Notice Bulletin
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Building Department
Southold Town Board of Appeals
Southold Town Attorney
Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
NOTE: Negative Declarations for Unlisted Actions need not be filed with DEe or any other agency (see 617.7(a)).
,t' ." f.
.
.
Conditions imposed with respect to the issuance. by the Town Board of the Town of
Southold, of a Conditioned Negative Declaration with respect to the application of
Jeanne Grim for a Recycling and Salvage Facility:
(1) The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage
areas, must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the
Town of Southold Planning Board for review and approval. The Planning Board
should make a separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the site
plan submitted, in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
(2) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
manufacturers specifications for the concrete/asphalt crusher, which specify
noise and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared
against applicable standards to ensure compliance, and or need for specific
setback, sighting or additional mitigation measures.
(3) The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9:00
a. m. and 5: 00 p. m. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance
with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(4) Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 30-days from the date of acceptance, in
accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
(5) The facility shall be operated. in a manner which will eliminate or control
nuisances such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with
the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste Engineer,
dated December 10, 1990.
(6) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
estimated truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact
upon local roadways.
(7) All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage
facility in an identified area. There shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drums
for storage of toxic or hazardous materials, contained within the building at any
one time. There shall be no floor drains within the building. Compliance with
these conditions shall be determined by the Building Inspector prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and subsequent inspections as necessary.
(8) All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified
Industrial Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in certain
heating equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility, provided
it is conducted in accordance with all applicable New York State and Suffolk
County requirements.
(9) The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with the above conditions. The applicant shall file a covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
* *
* *
,
.
.
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 26, 1991:
RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State
Environmental Quality Review Act, and 6NYCRR Part 617.6(h), and Chapter 44 of
the code of the Town of Southold, the town Board of the Town of Southold hereby
issues a Conditioned Negative Declaration with respect to the application of Jeanne
Grim for a recycling facility at Oregon Road, Cutchogue, subject to the following
conditions:
(1) The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage
areas, must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the
Town of Southold Planning Board for review and approval. The Planning Board
should make a separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the site
plan submitted, in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
(2) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
manufacturers specifications for the concrete/asphalt crusher, which specify
noise and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared
against applicable standards to ensure compliance, and or need for specific
setback, sighting or additional mitigation measures.
(3) The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9 :00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance
with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
(II) Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 30-days from the date of acceptance, in
accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
(5) The facility shall be operated in a manner which will eliminate or control
nuisances such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with
the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste Engineer,
dated December 10, 1990.
(6) In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
estimated truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact
upon local roadways.
(7) All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage
facility in an identified area. There shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drums
for storage of toxic or hazardous materials, contained within the building at any
one time. There shall be no floor drains within the building. Compliance with
these conditions shall be determined by the Building Inspector prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and subsequent inspections as necessary.
.
.
(8) All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified
Industrial Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in certain
heating equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility. provided
it is conducted in accordance with all applicable New York State and Suffolk
County requirements.
(9) The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with the above conditions. The applicant shall file a covenant to
ensure compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
* * * *
~~~
.../. --?
Judith T. Ter~
Southold Town Clerk
March 1, 1991
,
.
.......... ............................... .........., N. Y.,... f.'~?~!':~Y. .?? I..... .I~~.~...
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, N. Y., Dr.
To............................. ~~~~~~s:.~~~~!~~~:~;~~~~:. ~~~:........... . Claimant
MILLER PLACE, NEW YORK 11764
Address.... .......... ....... ...... ................. ......... .......... ......... .........
Fed. I. D. No. ....................................
or Soc. Security No. ........................
. II ,
02/27/91 RE: Jeanne M. Grim - Oregon Road Recycling Corp.
Invoice #930
Completion of the revi,ew of the Long FJ\F
Part I and completion of the Long EAF Part II,
as per Board authorization. , /'
&~~b~A/A /-7':.' l-r7 ../.,.,hW /
TarAL BALANCE DUE: jiffY IV $500. 00
The undersi ned (el . ant) (Actin on behalf of above named laimant) does hereb certif that the
g ~ g y y
ross out one)
foregoing claim is tru and correct and that no part thereof has been paid, except as therein stated, and
that the balance therein stated is actually due and owing.
"
Dated ......:f~......2.'~L.., 19..9.1... ...Cl:l~..~....~..! A'
Signature """V.:- '-
f-
Z
UJ
::;
UJ
f-
~
(/)
.><:
r1:
.-<
(J
~
~ ~
C3 .....
o :::
en
en 'C~
c lllD:on
D:oon
all >..,
~:>'"
en ->..:.
_ CL&J",
:c 8=>Z'"
~ LJ~
o 'ulD
OZ:5:;;
><ta..~
10
D:
....
...J
...J
~
~
E-<
'tl
.-<
o
~
g~
III I>:
ri
10.1
:::E
c
~
(,)
.-<
"
'"
~.~ ;:1
"':.;: .><:
~LO ~
'" ><
.0
E-<"'''':l:
IO"Q)
.c: .-<z
+> ''-<
...-11"'1 ..
'tl'-<X'tl
:1 III 0'-<
.., :z: III 0
.c:
ui~o~
~E-<~~
L
--,
~o
",
z
..
.,<.;;"
W 0
0
z, 0
~w .
0
~J 0
,j 10
;<' <I>
>'if ~
.v.
ii 0
II
/ ~
q
II
:-\;4 0
:~''ll IL
.., W 0
II ()
z 0
<{ .
!~ ...J 0
<{ 0
m '" 10
J s:: <I>
~
,~l .-<
<~ 0 I
/., ~ >- Q) ~ .
'~i E 0 '" '" '" l5
,,0;:,;. .... Q) [il 8 Q)
ii! '" I>: Q) P, ....
,~ ~ .c: '" ..:l +>
. +> ~ '" III
. ~ Q) III N
0 :>: .... .c: ....
....j 0 +> . '"
ffi Q) 8 Q) H 0
s:: 8 .c: 'tl H .c:
m ~ '" eo +> ~ +>
:I Q) .... +> :1
.i: Q) ~ 0 ..... .... ~ III
.., (J Q) 0 H
'fj' .-< Po 'tl
0 P, :l: ..... ~
Ii ", B Q) ~ ~
:> '" f>! .... 0
'Z' .. (J > Po III
%;';)
~ .-< ,
t ~
dO('
[(0) "
l N
LA ....
N ^
w
o
,
1
.
w
"
"
,
o
.
;
,
,
"
2
w
"
o
,
.
,
o
I
w
o
w
.
.
w
C
.
.
<<
w
.
o
.
zZ
,.
0'
(1'6
~u
..
:5~
>z
~-
~
~
13
~
(j
o
II)
II)
C
all
II)
;:
~
o
g
r:i
....
:e
c
D:
U
.
.
.
February 25, 1991
Mrs. Judith T. Terry
South old Town Clerk
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Jeanne M. Grim - Oregon Road Recycling Corp.
Authorization of Recycling and Salvage Facility
SCTM# 1000-083-3-4.5
RECEMD
MAR 1 1991
Southold Tn",., d~
Dear Mrs. Terry:
As per your letter of authorization dated January 10, 1991, we have reviewed the
Long Environmental Assessment Form (Long EAF) Part I and completed the Long EAF
Part II, for the purpose of conducting a SEQR review of the above referenced proposal. We
find this project to be an Unlisted Action, with the Town Board established as lead agency
for consideration of authorization of a Recycling and Salvage Facility under Town Code
Section 48-1. Other agencies that we are aware of which have authority over such facilities
are as follows:
Suffolk County Department of Health Services - Wastewater Discharge Class 02
SPDES and Toxic Materials Storage:
Permit issued September 18, 1990; HS Ref No. C1Q-90-005 (Attachment A);
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation -6 NYCRR Part 360
exemption:
Exemption issued December 10, 1990; Letter from Regional Solid Waste Engineer
with conditions (Attachment B); and,
Town of Southold Planning Board - Site Plan:
Letter from Planning Board dated December 19, 1990 raising questions responded to
in a letter from the applicant dated January 1, 1991 (Attachment C).
Therefore, it is the Town Board's resl?onsibility to issue a SEQR Determination of
Significance. The following is an enVIronmental analysis of key aspects of the project, which
can be utilized as a Part III Long EAF or a basis for the Town Board's issuance of a
Determination of Significance on this project.
1)
2)
3)
EXISTING USE AND PROPOSED PROJECT
We have inspected the subject site, reviewed material forwarded to this office,
reviewed and corrected the Part I Long EAF, and completed a Part II Long EAF. The Long
EAF Parts I and II are attached for your use. Briefly, the site is presently in active use by
Oak Street Trucking, Inc., for the purpose of excavation and drama~e contracting, soil
screening, and offices. This use is being conducted in accordance WIth a Planning Board
approved site plan, and Zoning Board of Appeals authorization. In addition, the facility is
already approved for a wood chipping operation. The proposed use involves the addition of
recycling facilities which will ultimately mclude a concrete/asphalt crusher and car recycling
(fluid removal, crushing or cutting) and shipping off the site.
Page 1
54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455
,
.
.
.
Oregon Road Recycling Corp
Long EAF Review
ECOLOGICALLlliJ2 WATER RESOURCES
Due to the identified uses, the site does not contain any significant natural resources.
Much of the site is unvegetated (rock, earth or fill); accordingly, there is no significant
vegetation or wildlife associated with the site.
Water resources have been considered as follows. The site is within Groundwater
Management Zone IV (unique water regime with special problems), and is at the northern
border of the Water Budget Area as depicted on the SCDHS Articfe 7 Map, and Figure 7-1
of the North Fork Water Supply Study. The depth to groundwater is approximately 60 feet,
and groundwater beneath the Site migrates north toward Long Island Sound as is evident in
review of Figure 5-1 of the Report on Occurrence and Movement of Agricultural Chemicals
in Groundwater: North Fork of Suffolk County (SCDHS, 1982). The North Fork Water
Supply study indicates that the site is within a Nitrate Contamination Area (> 8 m~/l), and
within an Aldicarb Contamination Area (> 7 ug/l). In addition, the site is immediately north
of the Landfill. It appears from review ot SCDHS, 1982, that the project site lies down
gradient of the landfill, and therefore water resources could be impacted by contamination
emanating from the landf1ll. The NYS Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in New
York State; Volume 1 (NYSDEC, April 1990), indicates that the Town Landfill site is 41
acres in size and is an active landfill. The site is suspected of receiving solvents from a
machine shop, and is listed as having groundwater contamination confirmed. The site is
currently under further investijl:ation to define the direction of plume migration and the
extent of groundwater contammation. Accordingly, the site is not within an area which can
be regarded as particularly sensitive with regard to water supply resources.
LAND USE AND ZONING
From a land use standpoint, the site is zoned for industrial use. The area surrounding
the site, east to Cox's Lane, west approximately 750 feet to Deport Lane, and south to North
Road, is also zoned industrial. There are intermittent industrial uses in this area, most
significant is the landfill; however other uses west of the site and northeast of the site. The
area immediately north of Oregon Road is zoned "A-C" district for agriculture-conservation
use (includes residential land use density of one dwelling unit per acre. It is noted that at
agricultural use may be associated with noise and dust. In addition, the site is a minimum of
500 feet deep from the road, thereby allowing for setbacks and buffering of uses. This was
apparently a consideration of the Planning Board in imposing a 100 foot setback from the
road for the heavy equipment storage area. From a land use standpoint, and in
consideration of the lack of ecological and significant groundwater resources, the site and
area is suitable for properly controlled industrial use.
AIR. NOISE AND TRAFFIC
The proposed use involves an expansion of an existing industrial facility for
concrete/asphalt crushing, and automobile recycling, and is subject to consideration by the
Town Board for establishment of a Recycling and Salvage Facihty. This type of use has been
known to cause concern with regard to fugitive dust generation, noise generation, and truck
OCIATES
G CONSULTANTS
Page 2
,
f
,
.
.
Oregon Road Recycling Corp
Long EAF Review
traffic. In terms of fugitive dust, dust can be emitted as a result of trucks traversing dry
exposed soils. This impact is generally mitigated by establishing lots in gravel or asphalt
and/or providing water sprinklers to wet down soils. In addition, the crusher may cause
some dust, of unknown quantity at this time.
Noise would be a function of the crushing of concrete and ashpalt. It is noted that a
soil screening plant is in use on the site, and there is significant equipment noise associated
with operation of the landfill. In addition, mitigation in the form of silencing equipment,
baffles, setbacks, noise barriers, etc., are commonly employed to minimize impacts from such
equipment. It is necessary for the facility to comply with appropriate noise limitations and
compatible hours of operation.
Truck traffic is dependent upon the extent of business which is conducted on the site.
The exact volumes expected to be generated by the proposed use are unknown at this time.
Truck traffic is already associated with the site due to the present business. Existing road
adjacent the industrial zoned area includes Oregon Road (north-minor road), Cox's Lane
(east-minor road), North Road (south-4Iand divided highway) and Depot Lane (west-minor
road). These roads are presently under utilized and will be expected to sustain increased
traffiC loads as development in the area proceeds in accordance with zoning.
SOUD WASTE MANAGEMENT
The proeosed use involves a recycling and salvage facility. Once the facility is fully
completed, It will include a wood chipper (already approved), which will allow for
acceptance of certain clearing debris and other wood waste, which can be chipped and
reutilized for a variety of purposes, most significant being for mulch and landscaping. The
concrete/asphalt crusher will allow for acceptance of road demolition debris and other
associated concrete/asphalt waste, which in turn will be crushed to be reutilized as road base
material in construction. The automobile recycling will involve reuse of auto fluids (to be
drained and stored inside in accordance with SCDHS requirements), and scrapping of
automobiles, thereby allowing the recyclin~ of these materials. This operation IS expected to
have a beneficial affect by reducing the solid waste stream required to be disposed of at
municipal facilities, and allowing for privatization and recycling of the above noted
materials. This is in keeping with sound solid waste management planning, provided other
potential environmental detriments are avoided.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Overall we feel that the subject is generally environmentally compatible in
consideration of ecological and water resources, and land use and zonin~. In addition, it is
recognized that the proposed activity will provide benefit in terms of solid waste
manailement. At thiS time there is insufficient information to judge the potential impacts
assOCiated with fugitive dust, noise and traffic, associated with the specifiCS of the equipment
and operation to be conducted on the site. Once the specifics in terms of positioning
equipment on the site, manufacturers of said equipment, and expected intensity of use of the
facility are known, these impacts can be further evaluated.
Recognizing that the proposed use is compatible with the site, environmental impacts
CRAMER, V
ENVIRONMENT
OCIATES
G CONSULTANTS
Page 3
1-
. .
,
6)
7)
8)
.
.
Oregon Road Recycling Corp
LongEAFReview
are expected to be minimal, and that mitigation measures are available to minimize
potential environmental effects, the Town Board may wish to consider issuance of a
Conditioned Negative Declaration (CND). The CND is provided for in accordance with 6
NYCRR Part 617.6(h), in order to impose conditions which "have eliminated or adequately
mitigated all significant environmental impacts and are sup.{lorted by the Full EAF and any
other documentation". The EAF is provided herein, and thIS letter provides a Part III type
narrative and other documentation relevant to the issuance of a CND. Recommended
conditions are as follows:
1)
The proposed sighting of the concrete/asphalt crusher, and automobile storage areas,
must be incorporated into an amended site plan and submitted to the Town of
Southold Planning Board for review and approval. The Planning Board should make
a separate Determination of Significance in consideration of the site plan submitted,
in accordance with SEQR Part 617.
In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish
manufacturers specifications for the concrete/asphalt crusher, which specify noise
and dust emissions. These data and specifications will then be compared against
applicable standards to ensure comphance, and or need for specific setback, sighting
or additional mitigation measures.
The concrete/asphalt crusher shall only be operated between the hours of 9:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m.. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure compliance with this
condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
Only clean concrete and asphalt may be processed by the subject facility, and
materials may not be stored more than 3D-days from the date of acce.{ltance, in
accordance with the NYSDEC Part 360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid
Waste Engineer, dated December 10, 1990.
The facility shall be operated in a manner which will eliminate or control nuisances
such vectors, odors, dust and noise at all times, in accordance with the NYSDEC Part
360 exemption issued by the Regional Solid Waste Engineer, dated December 10,
1990.
2)
3)
4)
5)
In conjunction with the site plan application, the applicant must furnish estimated
truck vehicle trip generation estimates in order to consider the impact upon local
roadways.
All automobile fluids shall be drained and securely stored within the garage facility in
an identified area. There shall be no more than 5-55 gallon drunIS for storage of toxic
or hazardous materials, contained within the building at anyone time. There shall be
no floor drains within the building. Compliance with these conditions shall be
determined by the Building Inspector prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
and subsequent inspections as necessary.
All collected fluids will be removed on an as needed basis by a Certified Industrial
Waste Scavenger. Technology is available to burn waste oil in certain heating
equipment. This condition does not preclude this possibility, provided it is conducted
in accordance with all applicable New York State and Suffolk County requirements.
CRAMER, V~ J'ASOCIATES
ENVIRONMENT~G CONSULTANTS
Page 4
~
.
.
Oregon Road Recycling Corp
Long EAF Review
9)
The applicant agrees to allow access to the site and facilities by Town Officials
and/or legitimately designated Town representatives for the purpose of ensuring
compliance with above conditions. The applicant shall file a covenant to ensure
compliance with this condition, to the satisfaction of the Town Attorney.
We believe that the above conditions are consistent with the intent of the use of
Conditioned Negative Declarations as outlined in Part 617.6(h). If the Board finds these
conditions acceptable, we would be {'leased to draft a Notice of a CND, which must be
published in the Environmental Notice Bulletin (stating what conditions have been imposed)
for a minimum 3Q-day comment period, as well as filed in accord with Part 617.1O(a)(2). It is
recommended that the Board withold decision on the Recycling and Salvage Facility
(Section 48-1) until the minimum 3Q-day comment period is complete, in order to allow for
any input which may occur as a result of the filing requirements. Once this comment period
is expIred a decision may be made provided no substantive comments are received.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide this information to the Board, and please
do not hesitate to call if you have any questions.
~
enc:
Attachments A, Band C
Long EAF Parts I and II
Supervisor Scott Harris and
All Town Board Members
Harvey Amoff, Town Attorney
cc:
OCIATES
G CONSULTANTS
Page 5
~
.
.
AITACHMENT A
OCIATES
G CONSULTANTS
Oregon Road Recycling Corp
Long EAF Review
1
I
.
I
PROPOSED, SITE PLAN
FOR
DONALD
" .
.
,
GRIM.
. .
SITUA TED A T
CUTCHOGUE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD'
SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y
1000 83 03 4.5
Scale 1" = '50'
Feb. 1, 1990
.
SUFfOlk eOUNfY DEPARTMENl OF HEAll,. SCRVlC[t
APPROVED fOR CONSTItUCJlON ONU
IfS, REf HD. c //? - 9...., -;'7e;S 'lOW L6.j' G...~
~ ,
'Ypt - .-/ A/()C/ST.<-< /I C. _
'h,s 'll,.rov,l'ls .ranlld for the COI1Struc:tio" P' ''''' 'ifill."
disposal and w,tef sUIIIlI, facifilies PIItsllanllo Atpr.:/'s ~.. _'~l
1 01 tne Sultolllc;ounl, $anilar, Code ~M 1$ nol 4n i..pmsetl
IIOr tmP/ieG ''''''oval to diS(h."e ItOll\ O' 'letUP, lItt
. 51ructu'els, ShOll''' nt/S APPROVAl EXPIRES lwei
FR()t.\ 'lfE 04\C BElOW
iEP 1 8 1980
.
D4'E
---
· of w.lI. II/d c'..poo/. .hown h.,.on Ir. f,om fI.,d
and 0' f,om d.t. obtlln.d f,om oth.".
.nd ,.w.g. di.po../
lid.nc. will confo,m
Th. Suffolk County
th S"I'io...
Prepared in accordance with the minimum
standards for title surveys as established
by the L.I.A.L.S. and approved and adopted
for such use by The New York State Land
Titfe ASBociatlon.
" .~
~
-.~..._'
LIe. NO. 49678
P.e.
90 - 70Be
WWM-OU6 (Rev. 6/89)
f" ~ ~
, '
'11):
L (.'(XNf.:!.J~PARIMENr OF HEAL!SERVICES
Notice No.
'2-
,
FROM:
Bureau of Wastewater Managenent
Suffolk County Center
Riverhead, New York 11901
516-548-3312
N:1l'ICE OF m:nn>rElE APPLICATlrn - CCI!MEICIAL
H.D. Ref. No. c<'''' -Fo - OCJ S-
Applicant
Article VI & Article VII Zone -f
T.M. Designation /fT>"eJ _.pJ -3 1- /~1>1
'!HE F'CII.l:OUN:; IS RfXXJIRED IN OODER 'ro CCNrINUE REVIF.W rn '!HE AOOVE.
=-=-=-=--=-=--=-=-==-=-=-==-=-====-===========================================================
[~ and/;-;" vlIl~Je ~i~;Ardlt~ YERKIU< ~I~liC Water/Sewer Availability letter
-[- '-frrnplcteGl -wlicatian fu.LllI IMI! ee~) [ ) NYSDEC Wetlands Pennit or Waiver
[ ) SEQRA Determination [ ) Restrictive Covenants: Art. 7 Other
[ ) SPDES Fonn [ ) SPDES Site Plan 8 1/2" x 11" [ ) Pr=essing Fee
[ ) SPDES Fee $50.00 $75.00 [ ) Denitrification Pennit Application
"toring/Sampl-:Lng_.PJ.im..-(.8_..llZ.~_ x 11" Review Board Detennination
r J ~ -1/ -'70
~IOO-MISS
100. 'COOR&'::TIrns RfXXJIRED rn PLANS
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
] Tax Map Designation [ ) Plans Not Signed/Sealed
] Metes and Bounds Description fA [ ) Industrial Statenent/Signature
) Lot Size [ ) Deed Locati.oR\ ". [] Sewage SystE!ll Plan/profile
] Key Map [ ) '!'est Ho.lEi~.~:" [ ) Gallons/Day/Acre Sewage Discharge
) Gross Floor Area of Building .4.i '> [ ) Sewage Disposal Design Calculations
] All Surface Waters Within 300'. . ~<f ....,.~nsufficient Denitrification Details
] Private Well Details and Location.df",l.. .(' .JPJ lie' water/Sewer Line
J Neighboring Wells and Sewage SystEIrS" ~ [ <'()" xpansion Area for Sewage SystE!llS
Within 150' of Property \., . 0 {9 [~y Site Statistics
J M:>nitoring Well Detail ari<t l.oG'.a~n :90 [ ) Capital Costs. of Sanitary SystE!ll or
~c~~~ Capital Cost of Denitrification
J Latitude and Longitude Descripti-oo..tp. [J Operation and Maintenance Infonnation
[ J Project does not confonn to Department s~. See Notice of Non-Confonnance.
~"nts: /':'4- e:>-<- ~c/.L '- PA -LP c-- L..zz...6G _..../~ r'k~-" : r.:: .
~, Cl.. .'/ ".
-;ib~~ ~~ ~".
.-- ." - ----. ---- -.. .- .. . ____... . .-___0_--
[ ~lan reView is being coordinated with the following.
~riew and pennit issuance re applicable.
[vi' Art} VII [ ] Art. XI [
, .
Approval cannot be granted without
J Ecology [ J DPW [ J Oil Tanks
By
Date ......ft?O
0//)
18-948..8/89
>-'
.~
.
.
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
PATRICK G. HALPIN
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
April 16, 1990
DAVIO HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H.
COMMISSIONER
Ms. Chris S.Yiu, P.E.
Sealand Surveying & Engineering, P.C.
40 West Main St.
Riverhead, NY 11901
Subject: Donald Grim Site Plan
S.C.T.M.: 1000-083-3-p/o 4.4
H.D. Ref.l: C10-90-005- -
Non-Community Water Supply
Dear Ms. Yiu:
This office has been advised by the Department's Wastewater
Management Section that the referenced commercial application
proposes the use of an individual well system.
All applications for approvals to install a private water system
or to utilize an existing well must include evidence satisfactory
to the Department that there is no public water supply available.
All commercial applications will be required to connect to a
community public water system, if the system. has sufficient
capacity to service the applicant and the mains of the system are
within 500 feet of the applicant's property line or; within a
distance equivalent to the gross square footage of the proposed
.structure divided by ten (minimum 500 feet) for a commercial or
industrial parcel (e.g. within 600 feet of a 6,000 square foot
building). If hookup to a community water system becomes
feasible (due to the water main extensions or system capacity
expansion) during the construction of a new structure that has
previously received Department approval for a private water
system, then the approval for that private system is voided, and
the applicant must file a revised application with the
Department.
If a private well is proposed it is considered to meet the State
Sanitary Code definition of "non-community water supply." Such
well proposals must be review~d by this office in accordance with
the State Code. Please refer to the Suffolk County Department of
Health Services' "Standards and Procedures for Private Water
Systems," revised edition dated January 1988, for the information"
required for any private well proposal submitted to our
department. Additional design guidance is available in NYSDOH
publications "Recommended Standards for Water Works" and "Rural
Water Supply".
BUREAU OF DRINKING WATER
22!5 RABRO DRIVE EAST
HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK I 1788
ISle) 348-2778
l'"
. ,
.
.
, ,
Approval shall not be issued until you submit the following
details of your water supply design, as a minimum:
1. Size and capacity of wells, storage facilities and piping.
a. Minimum yield of 5 gpm or a yield equivalent to the
design sewage flow divided by 144, whichever is greater.
b. Minimum capacity storage tank of 82 gallons or ten times
the minimum yield, whichever is greater.
c. Minimum length well screen of 3 feet.
d. Pitless adapters or units certified by NSF OR Water
Systems Council must be used on all wells (except
suction-lift stations; see Section 8 Pumoina Eauipment in
SCOHS "Standards and Procedures for Private Water
Systems")
e. Water-tight sanitary well seals or caps must be used at
the tops of casings orp~tless_ units, which must be at
least 18 inches above grade.
f. Pumps must be equipped with a pressure switch that is set
to operate at a minimum pressure of 20 psi with a 20 psi
differential.
2. Types of materials used for water supply components.
a. Casings must be made of standard weight stainless, black,
or galvanized steel, or plastic meeting standards of the
National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) and American
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).
b. Well screens must be constructed of non-corrosive
materials; stainless steel is preferred.
3. Specific locations of well and details of external piping
arrangements. Lateral lines between the well and building
must have an inside diameter of at least 0.75 inches, must
be firmly attached to ~he well casing, and must meet the
following additional requirements:
a. Peoth: entire length must be installed at the bottom of
a trench at least 54 inches below final grade to protect
against freezing.
b. Materials: must be constructed of type "k" copper or
high density plastic (clearly marked as ASTM rated at
least 160 psi and NSF approved for potable water
SUpplies).
c.
Seoaration:
horizontally
well.
Must be located at least 10 feet
from any sewer line, leaching pool or dry
I ,- . t
r, ,
.
.
4. Estimated well depth (subject to actual field conditions and
water quality testing). The top (not the bottom) of the well
screen must be at least 40 feet below the water table.
5. The sanitary radius around the proposed well shall be clearly
denoted on the site plan. A note shall also be included
which states: "there are no potential sources of sanitary
contamination within 150 feet or drainage structures within
50 feet of the proposed well." This includes all neighboring
properties within a 150 feet radius of the well for sanitary
contamination and 50 feet for drainage structures. Please
note that our non-residential sewage disposal standards
require that a 150 foot sanitary radius to all wells be
maintained including wells on neighboring properties.
6.----If freatment is needed;-the-detilils are to be submitted-with- ----
final approval documents; i.e., well driller's certification
and laboratory test results.
Please review the items mentioned in this letter and include the
required information. In particular, show the following
information for this site plan:
1. A minimum size storage tank of 82 gallons.
2. Show the well terminating with a pitless unit a minimum 18
inches above final grade.
3. Show the well at a minimum depth below the water table of
40 feet to the top of the well screen.
4. Show the lateral line a minimum of 54 inches below final
grade, with a minimum diameter of 0.75 inches and using
either K copper or NSF approved PVC pipe rated at 160 psi.
5. Include the sanitary note on the site plan, as indicated in
item 5 of this letter.
If you have any questions feel free to contact me or Paul Ponturo
at telephone number: (516) 348-2886.
Very truly yours,
??dd /. ~".€
Robert J. Farmer
Assistant Public Health Engineer
Bureau of Drinking Water '
cc. Robert w. Jewell
Doug Feldman
-
_._._~
- -
. a - ./ 0./ .WIL.(-CO~
!hv.s W iCl!.5 /i 01/ E: '5 no -"W / - / / j:w-'7- c
T. 1.
):)e..Po.v+yy>e..-Yl+ ofl-feu..lfn ~e{ey~=# C/o-90-006-
=rF1, /' 8+V(lk'p.JI<:.. -{II, St<..nd/s~-oYl.C..; ble:>7cJ;qrcA.YT::..-1 / ;5{i;yt:'-(!....r~cI
.. j: -fcpStull e.-k. -r;v V't..:5o../e..
I
I
~d.1
I
-#-3, i
=it .I I
~'I
.#5"1
:IJ=. &"
=#-1 i
. !
,
I
I
N/A
f'i/A
rJ/A
rV III
;J/A
A I - 55' qc;.,/I orJ dru.m YY>o-l-ov-- Q i I.
B I-55 qCLllorJdr-(.A.yV) aV>~;--h--ee..~
~ / -55 qcJlorJ dv-wn hycJy-O-l,0/,e. -flUid
b / -65 qo.-f) 0 rJ dr-Ll-VVl lJ5/I'Io qUJf!. /ubL
Ii ~ I -55' 9c<-lJorJ d'(uVY) ir./Ci:s+e. 0;).
.iF ?/lhure. vvili be. VlD dA6(!J)CJ.'fC/-CS -FOVYI -+h~
+~II 111 ----f-ho...-I- Cvu Id (!.J!;n+n,n -tox I C'.. Ov
ha.w.:a) 01) S VYlO--k:-v-; Cc l.s .
i
I
~i, I he...re,. wil) be. 100
If tlY'y'w h ~~ in '/-he...
I
!
-#/011 8-e..c.. 'i+b.~he.d -(?DOY -:p1~V) 0
Ii .. ..
-=#:I/,i! /h,,:; . CL.ppl Jud-lUY\ CWld a./I a~t1v'Y)~ .~
../1 ---/11;s Glpj)llCA:hOY\ (1Y'(.. -ku.L a.v,cl i!ayy,pkk
II:-+O-+h~ b6t-. 0.[: VY\..'f -knowied.>je....
I . 6"9VlC<..fuv-e.. 1-'1
I ! R~d
,
I
-rlo,?'r dr-(-liVJ0
t; utld Inc;
,
I-
I
II
"
I'
I!
.
.
.' ..-....'i..,-J.l...~ -co,' ~.. -...._.-:1,.,.-~-....Ft-...---~"T.~.r.~'t~~.-'...,.,,-.~~..-h-...\.....~.n-.~...''l'#-.t.. I'""#~~~~~~-""" --, .--",,"
~~'S)fd~'?":'" ,,~+-":-::-"'. :. :~;.Ji~~~<{~~';~;:~r~~.:-r:-{IgF~~Jtj..\r,,\;1;;t~~.~~fi:~-.;~(.tr"!..tJ:!,~~~-f;;t .....:tl--~t~1r~~~*.:.1;}.::~; '.~,'~~:
~~~ ~;~~:; ~:~:'::"':;:~.~',:;::~~::;;:::::-:/<':~:'!~~-::::::r':~',./, ~~ :, ::-:;: ,_'~t>"'.~:f~:
~:..':"r,. :;.- X-a., -t "J"" q,}~ ?~~ <."p"1't,.-.:;t'A-':f.t:i:')' ~ ~I.....f;'<"'_\~~h:~~~~z;.;>':~~" ......i"'.!-',~.f. ~ft~.!t~.'t.~'S.;j,..;..
t.;.7.~;' f.:~'~' :3-'itA .,~....,:;-o ~-"--':Il~" "'i.J.'J.,L(~~~""'~~~-~';~'t"':"",:::;;'f:-~~~I"rt:Jt.;~,.;:'?'i;.~""~:;H:~~~~.;..1'....;"~;'i.-;;~;;
!-::i;~~. ~ ~~. ;~l&&'-~~~~~ ~*~~l~x~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~!.~~1:~~l~~~~~~~~~~~fl-~:
~;;~-;!:~..- ~~ 1t~~.;,,~;, ~..:i-~:~~~'; :.-s..:J~%~;;:-~lt.~~~;1?:~~~:~~?t~}':- :;{~!'~~f::':;;.'.:~:~~~!k\t!!".c~:~~t~:;~~~~n
;. ~....... .;,\ ~-=_ .. '.J.:~'" ~$- -'!. ....,:.. .... y. j-{.t....J-:"<. ~......,,.;,';..: ."'\.)..~.a,,,'i-.!"'I"}" .........JT ~... ..,,~ ':'.... '~...-t-t...r..:~ ",~'~""'-:';('..;;.4?"
: l ~:~';i ~~j F.~~" ;~ ~1 :i:ti.:~~-:~ ~~ ~~:~~~ . :~. ~ :; :'.~~;~;~7?~'~)~~':;.:-:.l,'~r:t15~-~~\~~~:~?:~~~)":~~~: (:~ -:;. ~-'~ i:;' ~;~i?~,;-I~;~~~it~~:'~ J~.t- ~:~-
\\ !:u;......:,; ....~., }.;.:~ ~ ~""" "_ ,~ ~. ~:.-:!.'\;:'-";"':-'~f';.-"..ti~~"t~~""~"""'-J~.~'vJi"'>;~:",,,,,!,,;:'t.:..f.}i....-~1;..."';';.~1"g"'{:.,,...'\:',"'~oII"'"..Jc:...J:.1. ~
~ r~;;':-. ~ ~.:. f...~~~' \ ~]~;;~'!;.%~U;l\~'......,:....3-:~-l~1:~....(..;.~)::f,. '..:::"~i:.'" 7:-J'I"5.h":X'~.j.~~n!-l"J~n:~:f1
::- ~~~ "", _""t:. ~<:-<df~; ~fmS\[~'@~'!l~->i~~7:~~'j~s{i~~~~;J!~I' ~~~~~~~;a~~fff1~'J
..J .:~~~,.. ~,_. f, ~~?:~.. ~.;. ~11~~@~'1P;:~:~f~r:tS.;a'1?~'Bt~'~~?~~'i~~i;?~4;.'*fJ?~ . ;~~"'-~.~ ~[&J ~ '~<1
'_,,"' ..'1 ~ ... . """'A'5 - ....~.' ,l- 51:;S~'" ~:.:."'i,;""...-...'... ,r... ~ ~ ~..e' .... ... .
~~_'b ~ . ~ .. ,..~?'''-1.;~1:..>f~..,.,~;>tJ$f~;:.~~~~?$........+-~...~t~...~......E: n. '. .v ~...~$
~~L !I ~. .~~. .~.. -~......:. e~~~ ~~., ..A1h~'l:; "';'~i.:+~.!Si:,i...t-h:~"'''"!ll,''''::''' ~~\
S,'-;l_ - - '..' -.=~ .:~i~~a;:,;,~:-.~~gi1~.~~ '''''iI.~J-'''>;'';'-;''''<''';';:'''=''~:JP<;'''~' ,~~-,,,
:\"'=_.. 't,#- ~~_~,,,><.g"""~'L_~,,,; -<- ....:-;~"1-..--..,",,..,",",,.,,._- -,~ "",""'"
\ J::;;;...:_..... ",,- _.(;'it'-}7':-'~.':.!;~..c: 1;';'",,-.i:'~~~'~ ':tt;;',~~w~,-;.j -;~"bi-t~- "...,."........ ~ ! j.O.~
0:-....... - ' ...~:"'- ~..."1." .li'; ~~-- . - " ~p....... ~"....'r )# ..
;- t~ .'? ~ '~niJl.~..,,'}I;~~ll*'~~)}1{~~~~!f~._=~"g.:,' :"'1
, r::r;<<i ~;;;:..., ~'n .:~~...:;."~~t.~r~- --~~;~:~i~ ......~:. ~)i{....r...r.' -n.:;. y:;.t't~....I"".~...,. .
,~~ _ ~<~~~.>.*t,~j'r:~)~:1!!t~~'fl~~_~~~~.~.1
\i'\'l~1 ~ ~ '. ___ ~ . > -' .m~"~,,J~:.~"""~ ..'tff~;f~~W~~t;,~1i~~,~. .. }-~rr~~~~~J3sn"'ttf >ti
;- ;);~...,.~ . ". ." ~",,;~!1. M3..,~"'~-::(>!,,\",.;~<t;.<s.1;'l'!:'*~~"';..~~"'\~"'\f.1..~~;P.l.,::..f~a<~~2h,;1-~''-'r''Z~,-
v~'=-~'.::- ~.,. ~... .~'tl)tit~: ./,;;Ii'~~;~~w;.t"~..;l.;P~~t?!-?-=~~~~..e~~~Ertr~~~~~~~~~~~~-:.r;-~~~~~~{.J,lf'n J
~ ~~* ~~- ~ . i~~}~): ~.~Jti~~~~l~3:;~~~r..~7k!~r~~t1~~~~l~~~~~J*~~~li'f;\~~~t~~~;3
~ 7, ,"""......r_ 7Ofi""J.k .' -...r...~ ~~.._..'r~.;~"'~'-'~~.~.:'iJ(~....~,.~~_ rf~ ....-.''04 .~...~~.......''11~'''''''''''"d :;tY1'J~'":f':t>.""""..
S" f:~~" ~~-': ~,'"': ~~ri::ff~;;~.~~~~~:JI~~~~' ~~~~)~19i,~~~~t~$~1t~~~~~?;f~%f~~fWJ&r~~~~~~3
~.c:.~.;... _ ,..,,-~"" .... ,. ~s~~.-~ _'- 'p.~ ~.c.;:~ . o\..."....~ ~ ,J;,1-'..'';'''''''':;.r,. ~ .~~ < st,v.:;:J..,d;i".,&~,>-~ o.Ij'~"':.t"'f' ,.j'h~~.
t.t'f::t ~. ~~~.~, ~~~~l;j)~.:49: -~~~1~l2J?~;t~%~li%.~!:~5~~~1:3~1~!if~I~~~~~dC';{~~{;T;.;
j;!" ht'" i~ - i;;'!"'i{:-t"';:-"" .J*n-%'~' '-. -.:J ,:....T"+ ,.~u.~'~""*:",~"'~~y.;:o~..f....,-t;-""':'-'?o...,..;':I,,.~~:;;1.I.''-~"}~-.l.!>r .....\, ._*~
qr.'-"\ (;': ~'>.{.... ...~~~ ''':'''~-,..'T~ ~..':.f"'~~ ='\/"':'-Jl"~"';.Y' :~.... ~~~;':="'... ."'p..::..,...ro.;-.---._..,.'!.~~~:;-.:..~~. r-..;.~":~?'- :;);...r:Jr.ri-~tc;~"_Jo'"'ft4- ~.;t..., ~::. ~~
~~~~,..? ..: ...... '-~:!ff:.;1t...>-~ ...~..;';):J!~~;!':i'i,.;.~::..!1.'?l1~&.:~~.~V;~-<:J~.;.~~,it:~~~...~.f.:::.;-~~~1:Ji.~.I":~;rN;~c..::;.':~;.,t~-:..~...:'t'~.;:".."r~~f_ ~m'~
~'l.~s: .'f "':~"i'~;'.:'It?~.s :!:.::';.t::.;.~~"t:;._1lB..~...;":D~'..CC"';i~~,.~....n-....;o::;.):3""r.2:i:.,.. ~~~.-.~{~~ .-:..... ~~:J::~~~...:;:./.,........'l'l........= "f~~ ';-.
:>:<"~4~' ....':). ~1J-4~ .~; ,..,.-p-......_';J,;;..,. ~r......;;r:.....?F:.-~~ .i:'t:'''':'.~'--t.,....~ ",~,'.'~;V 'lr":;~" "J~ ..1'~ ~ ~<;_ '- ~- """"'~"''.l ~,:' ~I;_..,. ....; 0>. .
<.:r:: 'f!J{:1~... ":~1,'1:~:"f\ ,f'f_~"f~.<f~~~~.::c!f;~~~~~.~\..,..:;',t;:~Jot~.o:'-'.\ ~"'.~.?;t!!: ~...Y" ;~~,",JI~E ~,.~~-:.::..t.......~.....;~,\~~. \;,.,"1
~;~,~~~. .~ t:. !-t:i~.::~': -~;::~ ~i-.;.:;-~..\~~~~:ttl~.4'=:;:i~;r:.;;~f.....';3.~:~.-z:~.;i~.~~'f,:::::~r,?:,:::.t~..~-~t7;4:.'~~~.b....;:~}.t:.~' :\o~~
F~:{"I;O;- ':~{!~~.;; ~ ...,~~~!!J.r1t.....!~~~~~ ~;~;"i":r:(:-'~r::~ '>E ~.'1:.,:..!;--!J:;i"i;.:. .-...i:!....;.i'.;~.: :~!'1:i~;.z:. ~'t);..ti~;.t...~;.;;,~ :'ft~' ;.
~. ..........., " ...._" ,.'_ ~">~' .....".:"':7"0";~_ -\""'''''''1 ","'ir...' 'l" .........J'.. -, ~..., .-,~t_loi ('2'--. ::"\.... .....,-'J-~-__ -:~.:.~... 7.... -.:1" ~~. ~I..~;'i:;.'.::-;'-'."";",__",,,:;,- ........
}.,.............,.. ~.;:.:a., c.,,,1,"~~Y""-~I;~ ........:.::'" ~~..'..~;."...~~,......."';............ ..... .J<I '....."'I.......~,.- :,o,i". -~;.~.,~~ ~ .:'!--.' v..,~. ......;.,.l~.~~.I..~-,f,... ~..,.h"..:.I; --"n-'
:;'"x' ..---,.,;: ~~~.;.-- '\''''''',,-J''~, ..~,..,.. .l,_~... '~".'"''''''''.'''~~~:C:-i:!'-..,:..\".<t''''''''f''.'''' '"""--,;;.....t-..;,;-d~ "'.... -'. :It?.
r.~i~ ~) ~~~~J;&--'i~:;tf~TitZ.f$:?i'l':;Stt;~\~~tW~tff:~~~ ~~~~\~~j~~~iif~~J:r*.i~-S{--~~~
t~':!~;--~- .:-:....: f:;~~ ~.i~-;';~~\1i-.;;:tl:.:;:tii~:'~~~;S~;~~~:~':\-;:~i~.r;i.t:";"I~S'~:~~:1,~~l~:i.~t.j;;'-...(~::;t;~-~j~;-~';;~-:
.Ci~ ....~.. , '.':r:";~"::;-:.:3 ~.1;::.;Fj\"~4'~1j,g,-,,;:,,~"-f:: r-...;.~~~ ~;';'~...-:"2:.~"":~}i-;.1.,:,."..:J .~~~~' ~'..::..J':k,~'~:'-:;-:~""~?fi "'~';;!'~"'J:~i,o&.""'~~~.- :::.~.
t_~~;:f~ ~.';;;...)' ~~:~~J.~...~ ... ,;.:1-;..t.:..r..~~f:":,:: :'i:..~~;~: 1f1 :.:-:':--";7::k.~<>~0!~;~.';~:-Z?~:Y~':~~_~~-:.~":1r~:!:~;~~i}~;:';':'f~=:5~:;~+r t}::l~:
r.v"'.... _ -o-.......l~-"" .."J _...-:..."C.,......_.~_'i'~....'"..,.J.....~:4':>...~. "I'.,......,....''',....::wo_ .....,.,.'.. <,....~ ...,>.~.~r'<~~.n'1~~._--.,'_...~.A.,...J.?'---
- 'f- . """P."-ol '"";':V:"-'~.:1."' :.J--~~.~.'-"'..p,...,.:.... -...,'C7-'....~..-.......... ^'-" ....,.-1.... -.....,~.,.~'J.~,"'...g.......~.... ..'"
~.. ...c' ~ :::--~'.:.~.;.'l-.:.~ ~!,. .".~!~...~~:t...:."-~~:;~),.~":::...-L. .:~-..-:';'~':__..;" .;..>:t'~ll-""':';l:;' ....-I~i...,.,.!.::.J.:.!:-__.. ,->;-.<.!"~yA~!. ...-t~';...::;::~;:;:::t~::'l,:'<;:' ..;?j:
~~...~.~ ....,or..J.. .), -_..... .~..'.. .......~. -.c"'~'--'",!:,"'.A-""',;;;""..o::,:.",,_I'-"; ~... ~... ~'" ~_,..-:. ~"".'~''''t- .iA::....,- ~.....,
,"'-~j. '" ~ J;;:,-r,0I' ~ ~ ...-"...-:-.-~...,.._.::;..,-.1-'J' ;...."'-~t'.,'*.~:I.~-..........~.~-; ., _...t...,.,..-.... .;.c~..,;:...-.. .a~~1..~11.l1.~-C ~~.~ .._......:r- .~..->t.,:..
~~,:.;:.. r::> ~~ .~+~ 'ir":~1~ ~ 4i~,~~'S~5~~~b.~:;.'fr.-;~........,;,?~~:.'~M:.~~~~"'"x.:~~:-~~..\......~... ,~;,..&.-'"'~~ ~/..:..-.~~:'t.: ;;J;::~~~;:}~J-ii:..~~-L~;~.o:;\;.: ,i:.f.=.r~-
;::~~.ir~ ~:. :~;l:~..!~:~~l ;;:~;~H~.:~;t\. -;--}~=-.~h~;::;....~~-~'!i-t~ ~~:t;f:{? .!~,,?.:t;.:~..~?~..::-.::~ t~\5i?t.~~{~"f:,f.~3;;;,:-:*.ftt.~;..;#,~;-
'I.i>":"~ --~- ,-.............':O)-"'-,.r:.--:<-!.-.;l'.CLO.--~~.-.J.~~....-.. ""-"'r."''' ...~...- ....~.... ,-_.~ ..... ~"'N~:"'"'._',,'~};!"j '-'-('f'!o"
_=-: ..;:..:\:'.1' ':1?; rt~.:~~~~~ :-~-:,.. '.~:;.~... ~r{ P..';:c:.~~,f:s.~~ ;:..l::~'.).~;~~'"::>.~( "-;;;'-i~;=t:'i:.~~;''"';'/,,::~,~, ~~S~'...::J.j--t,.'J \- .i~~'.':(',-"J[:~,~: ..::..:.;~~.t'--tf:';Z
'::.,..,;... ;:.~, ..-ce:...~..."'... :-:-,~':.."_~,~."...,,,,~,..~1.l'" ~ ,.).........".~"...... ,~.. -...ir.;-.....;;~ .....~ L!'~"'. '.~ .........)-.c,.. "'.o<":...""..(.;,......A - ,_.
_.~._~ ~~ ;..:s~.-IV:-''$. .r-..\.'~'.\..;....~~(-' ~--..;....,.,."....."".;t-7tr. ~m "'- :. _.....~-:..\ .t'J"~;' -=... <,;.~,;... ..~.-,r; ''"i~.~...~ ~"'(t.J." :--l?"'~~.~).~" :.t.......,::-t r'
':. ~::r:: ~'f" o..;.::...-:'i:.~.;~ """ ...:S:!~~;r-::$~"!;. -;;-::~~'t:~~~'F.....;'1 ~.~;~..~~:O'~.:-'")~;..i~~-hPl ~:;.. ~z,:!"'"I'-;r;5':. !~~~;.,\.'!.~~:,.c..:;f:;.,~~ '~~ ~".:!:.:
~ ~ .~._ _--~~ .-l.r;j"~ _' ... "r:~'''';''''-i 'O:"'....i ~'<-' ---- .................. ..~..._o\....... .."-~:---".:,.~..>; ,.' 't~i..:.&:;,' ,.. -~ ~ ....~~ 1~' ,,-.....! :t"'l~:-:'\.~J"~.~~l
t~t ~i~;' i1r;-~~::t~~:J~lM~~~;~~~it~(f~t:it~lf(kl~~i~~fiYi.~~~{~~~~t.~lii~~~!f~.'
.'t.~}~_ ~~.. ""'i~,:.t: i .;...:.;.:..:.:!:~(.3I&~~~.~.t--..-..~-::.,i.~~;3"-€~1~.;'i .-'f..;.;::?::;;t4---::tJ:t\.{./;f'"t~'}~~"~~'~c'-;\=,!~.f;~( ':l.:"'~ !:yT.l~~,;".::'<.!~- ~
&1~~, ~: ::~: ~ ~~~14}~~:~j,i}~"~~*~~~]~~~~n~?i:;~~I~~~~f;J~~r~;~{\~~~K~(r~~~W~~-
(.:-.~~:; ..T,~...~...,. r t-..J:!:~... ~... t, .;' J.... ....:.. .~.~ .~'-.. -;of~!i-' ~ _.;/ -;.: ""~'~-i~ ~''':''I ,",:&..:.~~v)~,) :....._~~. -.......~,..,.. (..>..""...~..-:.;~~." .': ."_.~-. ..t,..._
~~~f~~~ J r~tlf1~:~;fli;:;~X(~J~!11~~lfl~ttl~;~
,"" 'T"' ,," '" "' .',,,,.,,' "'.'" .l,,, ..,- """ .", ., ."',, .,,~ ,.. " ..... <
:;:..4;;;,-, ~ 1, ';W~l\';3!::;:"'ii '4,:7~; l;--"!';k -%'~:;{:~i~':''f,~~~~;'f~:';f>ii;' ~~~ ,,--.::. ~:~~'t:~"-'~....~.~:;-::$~;/; ?;i'
~r..\t:: ~..'!': to.~'1 ~~~~~~~-:-;.~.:~.;-::.~.i;~~o1("'~".'''~ -,~..... 7';'-'''-. HH -.., :.:.".~ '~!..1.k '~ly/.'~ '~~~
:~"~'....;.~ .:~~ '7!:~~" ..~..~.::l'o,..~:. _'"....~..:._.~.::'.:!.~':.~;:~.;.>.J.~-~.;-.':i~.. , .~~ ~.~:;-.,.;..:....: ~..".:-~?c~- ,::,,:,:~:;!:::!':";~~T:i ::/~
~...~ ~ '_~ ,~-.?'::>-..:; &..:t.i.....8}.....y.;. &;:'.('!~':;.'i.1"'''..'''... s:~~.~".-.~.p P'i:"J..:,.""~~.~.,;....../<,.j....._~';:......V..",~",,, _"'. \,00...... t;.....~.. _...1', I =..::r:-":J: ..',:(. ,,-
...':....~. .-;--,.~/r...f'."'~ :-,....--f"'...A.-.......,-.:. '':';'-';j<. "r'l'" f,ll..."V"f,:..i';..':.r..,:-.........-.:"'f.':.",~..,...:....t~<:.,.~_~""'~..~"-r_..~...........?....~~ '! -.;_.. ~''''
~ "'_ _~ ~~ ": ...~. -" .,.__ "../ ~:I.,..~l,.....:-'...',. .Ii..., I, .... "'. rV,~r,l"'" '-"~"ir'l _~~"~J~~("~. ::.1"'00\.'" "., ~.- ......~-.~.........-I..1-l: "...~'" 4;.:--.....- -.. ..-...~ "''1{'
{~::~:: ~~{~:::}y.{;1::~.;-:~.,~ ...._1:'~$<:;:::~.:f.:'.f ~ ::"f~ ~~~.:;';" :1t;'~~f1.~~ .h::\? :.~},~::-~<';'-~'~ l;~v;~=f'; ft.: Z;~~~~~~t~::.:";,~:~;
-....~. r"< "..... 'o!1 .-t::'.r.c:.T"..'~" ,;i .'_~'''' ....-<-~..,.. .~ ...~..~.; .-4\:__o:.::Jt:.~ ~~..., ...,"'.,....).,!, ..'~-,;>~....,./.J..~..~..~ .~~ ". .-<-1..<:';. .. .",/
. _....._. ... .h.._.............,_.....,. ....'_...,..".,...:-.~,..'_.':::I.".....1..,.1O..1..'.....;-'.........~.._,_-;:.;',:.i....
.
.
".~~'-,,,,.
r . 1 .
.
.
ATIACHMENT B
CRAMER, V~ IA\sOCIATES
ENVIRONMEN~G CONSULTANTS
Oregon Road Recycling Corp
Long EAF Review
~.... "
. "
.
.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Building 40-SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356
(516) 751-2617
~-
.....
~
December 10, 1990
Thomas C. Jorllng
Commissioner
.
Ms. Jeanne M. Grim
Oak Street Trucking, Inc.
P.O. Box 300
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Dear Miss Grim:
This is in response to your letter requesting an exemption
from 6NYCRR Part 360 permit to your concrete crushing facility.
We have reviewed the information which you submitted to us. We
are granting an exemption pursuant to Section 360-12.1(3), "the
storage of recyclables on the property of a manufacturer for use
in the manufacturing process in the place of virgin material", in
Part 360 regulations with the following conditions:
- Only clean concrete and asphalt are allowed to accept in
this facility. After crushing, the materials must be used
in place of virgin material. Also, the material must not be
stored more than 30 days from the acceptance date.
- Nuisances such as vectors, odors, dust and noise must be
controlled at all times.
- Operation must be limited to the area which is shown in the
survey map approved by SCHD, re #C10-90-005 FLOW 16860D.
- Facility must be properly closed on termination of the
operation.
The violation of any of the above conditions will result in
the revocation of the exemption status.
We would appreciate your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
\J141 ~. ()Wrr
Paul M. Roth, P.E.
Regional Solid Waste Engineer .
PHR:mz
cc: P. Danie!
, .
.
.
ATIACHMENT C
OCIATES
G CONSULTANTS
Oregon Road Recycling Corp
Long EAF Review
-- ....."
/tl
, .
.
.
r
..J ~1'rrt\arv 1. 1 '3i3 i
RECEIVED
Soutnold Pla~ning 80ard OffIce
SCluthclld TClwY'1 Board
TerwY'1 Hall
53095 MaiY" Road
Southold~ N.Y. 11971
I ~~l 2 '1~011
~. d __
SO!Jthl"ttri T .....,"" ("'r~
He: Aoo 1 i cat i OY', clf OregcIY" RC1ad Rec'.yc 1 i Y"lg Coroorat i CIY'I t c.
operate recycling and salvape facility
SCTM #1000-83-3-1+.5
Dear Sir or Madam:
!Y'l rf.?SOOY'!se tCl tt",e attacheo lette'",' i.iated Dee-erobe)'" 1'3..
1990 addressed tel -ehe SC1uthcfld TClw\"'J Ecccard l'""egardil'H~ the abclve
meY'ftioYled. belclw are <::\rJswers to the ouest.1Cq",S ado"ressed iY"
the letter.
#1. At this time the ccffice building is not \.to yet and
ram l"fot sure whey, it will be bl~lil'c. Whey, it is
built it will l",CI't be useCi by cO"'Y secortoa'f'Y busiY',ess
unless approval is received by the Z.B.A.
:,*2.
Tel be c3Y'lswe'r"'ed bv tCrWl'" board member Telm ~iic:.'H.harrl.
#313.
Yes it will be cccntinued.
#3b.
At this time the orclcclsed llse will be a....' accessc1ry
use. The orooosed use will remain an accessory
Ul"/til it becc.mes fiY'lal"fcially stable a"('Jd carl Cloerate
C'Y"I 1 t S CIWl"f.
If you have a~y further ouest ions regarding this matter,
YCIU may coy,tac"C DCI~jald Grim {734-7078'l' 734-7014" e,l.... 734-
7248. )
S )"cerel~~ "rs,
_Cl:l'U"'fe f'rl. "r"" 1 rll
..;u"
l:'. .'. '
-.;:
.', ~ .
. ,-. r,r-.. ~J..~
, '
.
.
RECEIVED
DEC'20 1990
· k:'W(J)
.
~""""'T..,.,..(1,
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS . .
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chainnan
George Ritchie Latham, Jr.
Richard G. Ward
Mark S. McDonald
Kenneth L. Edwards
SCO'IT L. HARRIs
Supervisor
Telephone (516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall; 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
SouthoId, New York 11971 ')
;;.
Fax (516) 765-1823'
,~
December 19, 1990
Southo1d Town Board
c/o Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Dear Mrs. Terry:
Pursuant to your letter of December 12th, the Planning
Board has reviewed the application of Donald J. and Jeanne M.
Grim to operate a recycling and salvage facility on their
property.
Re: Application of Oregon Road
Recycling Corporation
to operate recycling
and salvage facility.
SCTM #1000-83-3-4.5
In response, the members of the Board wish to convey the
following information to the Town Board:
The first approved site plan for this property is dated May
5, 1986. That site plan allowed the construction of a 2400
square foot storage building and garage with conditions which
were imposed by the Board of Zoning Appeals (That Board's
decision on Appeal #3491 is enclosed). The site was designed to
" accomodate the applicant's sand and gravel stockpiling and
trucking business.
'--:..., .'..
..~:...{'s--~_
"'-'J,..:..:,.,';,"!
"
-
In 1987, Mr. Grim applied for an amendment to this site
plan for the addition of a new 1200 square foot office building.
The Zoning Board imposed conditions on the new building, one of
which was that the building be used for office use incidental to
the existing principal business nperation (then known as Oak
Street Trucking). A copy of their decision (Appeal #3595) is
' included also.
'''''''
~,~-;...~;:: ';';0;,
An inspection of the site revealed that the 'property was
developed in accordance with the first approved site plan, but
not the amended plan. The enclosed copy of an aerial photograph
of this property taken in 1988 shows the eXisting structure.
, '-,:
. :.' ,-:,~.~~. i ~
.. :rf~:~~_~
.
~-, .
"\J:i-
','.
. . -." "~,' -
J .... ;-~. ,,~:..~~~&~l~~i;;';'t~'.~.:,.,,::';.~-.'::.<:.;':i~~;-i../;,S~1
, .
.
.
The site plan that was submitted to the Town Board with the
application is the amended site plan, which shows the addition
of a second building which is to be used as an office building.
~) There is a question as to whether the proposed use will
~meet with the conditions that were placed on the property by the
Zoning Board of Appeals, and recognized by the Planning Board
when it amended the site Plan.~I~
There are other questions. this application the same
type of application as Mr. Pfluger's request to operate a refuse
disposal site?
~'\-e application does not indicate whether the existing use
~"suhject slte wU1 be COOti""""~~;S' wlll the
pr~po~ed use be the principal use or cessory use to the
ex~st~ng use? }:#: 30
Given the unanswered questions, the Board is not in a
position to determine if it wants, or needs, to be a co-lead
agency on this project.
Very truly yours,
~~~f4'/~
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~
Chairman
#
,)
,'0;", ,
,. ,~1!lr
'-~ 'l.I ...
il~
. :,.'"
,~1
~kl
''''c:'~l
. -', . ,.
''"'-",::l'._ .~'
, "~~T;~~~'
''i~,,''
':,
''.1
~.
. . .::~
;::.1
:,{~
.1ff
'---"!'
"~'-I.
.,~
""\1
o'..~~',~
(
.,..
" :';-,~
',I
,;
....,..-;..
.~,.....;:-
. . -. .
'. "
'. . '''-'~'.,~' <:~iv~_~~~>~'\> ~iI --. ,,~.' "'-'". .-oi~:""~;;':"~~',,,~
.
.
SI.l6T€C[
.1"
';
~
, 1
..
'" ,"'
~ \ ':t~. 'd.
" .. ~
. 1-.
\. .1 'l!
.-.'f
,. ..Ii
.''1."" --,
.
.
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Soulhold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 12, 1990
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Gentlemen:
The Town Board is in receipt of an application from Donald Grim for
a facility to recycle and salvage all types of metal products. The Town
Board would like to know if the Planning Board wishes to join with the
Town Board as co-lead agency in the matter of the environmental review.
We would like to have your response by December 27th, 1990.
Enclosed is a copy of the Full Environmental Assessment Form and the.
application.
Very truly yours,
~~
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Attachments
,
.
~
-
9./s A/77,
INTER-OFFICE MEMO
FROM THE TOWN ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Town Board Members
Matthew G. Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney /fi.J.J
December 7, 1990
T own Board appoi ntment on December 11. 1990 at 9: 15 A. M.
with Donald Grim
In regard to the above-referenced appointment. annexed hereto. please find a
copy of a letter drafted by me on behalf of Donald Grim pertaining to his
application for a recycling center to be located on Mr. Grim's Oregon Road
property.
Inasmuch as Mr. Grim will be making an application for a refuse disposal area
permit pursuant to Section 48-1 of the Town Code. I felt it advisable that he
appear before the Board to explain his proposal and to answer any questions that
might arise.
-
-
-
December 6, 1990
Patricia B. Adduci, Commissioner
State of New York Department of Motor Vehicles
Division of Vehicle Safety
The Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller
Empire State Plaza
Albany, New York 12228
Re: Application of Oregon Road Recycling Corporation
and Donald Grim - Tax Map No. 1000-83-03-4.4
Dear Ms. Adduci:
At the request of Donald Grim, I am writing this letter to advise you of the
following.
It is my understanding that Mr. Grim is proposing to operate a recycling
center/refuse disposal area on a site located on Oregon Road in Cutchogue, Town
of Southold, New York. For your convenience, the tax map number for this site
is listed above. Mr. Grim proposes to operate this business through an entity
known as Oregon Road Recycling Corporation.
I have verified that the subject property is located in a district designated
for Light Industial. The uses permitted in this district. as of right and by
special exception of the Board of Appeals, are found in Section 100-141 of the
Southold Town Code, a copy of which is enclosed.
I have advised Mr. Grim, and he understands, that a "junkyard" is no longer
a permitted use in any zoning district in the Town of Southold pursuant to Section
100-237 of the Code. A refuse disposal site, however, may be authorized by the
Town Board of the Town of Southold pursuant to Section 48-1. This Section of
the Code places no restrictions on where the Town Board may authorize a refuse
disposal area and therefore it would appear that Mr. Grim's proposal at the
proposed location, subject to Town Board approval. is not violative of the Town's
Zoning Code.
. Patricia B. Adduci
December 6, 1990
Page 2
,
t
Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me.
MGK:mls
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Donald Grim
Very truly yours,
Matthew G. Kiernan
Assistant Town Attorney
,
RECEIVED
DEe 1 0 9lO
APPLICATION. REGULATING SECONDHAND, aK AND AUTO
PARTS ACTIVITIES AND BUSINESSES
IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Soli"""'! T ~...- rt....l;
<::::.,
~.~e
Partnership
Name of
\\qtO C{. ~0 l\q~-Y-
Address of B siness or Activity
~/:::/i1:;:;;e';f!$:: i~~
-/
I am under 21 years of age
Yes
No
I am a citizen of the United States Yes ~ No
Convicted of Felony or Misdemeanor
Yes
No
./
Number of employees to be engaged
4
~.~
of.~,~
.~~.~
v
Name and Address of owner of lands
and nature of the right of occupancy
of the applicant to the use of such
land.
Applicant must file map or plan of real property upon which business
is to be conducted with the following information:
1. Location of fence required.
2. Location of buildings.
3. Location of streets and highways.
4. Location of water and gas mains.
I hereby certify that all the above information is true to the best
of my knowledge and belief and that I will conduct the business
pursuant to the regulations set forth in the Ordinance Licensing and
Regulating Secondhand, Junk and Auto arts Activities and Businesses.
In.
~.
...vr,'f',....jl..t;, \;, ~MCf
tlcQry - :.'.:r,;r -...
-=::........
I I ...r. 0/,).0/12.-
Sworn to before me this
~day of ~Lrv1Jv- 19.1d.
q~ D:~~
Notary Pub ic
Applican
APPLICATI.oN FtREGULATING SEC.oNDHAND, ~ AND
..PARTSACTIVITIES AND BUSINESSES
IN THE T.oWN .oF S.oUTH.oLD
AUTO
f,'IS-
.. /0///
........
~.~ec
or Partnership
Name of
\\'1\0 (j. ~Q)l\q~.y
Address of B siness or Activity
~'-~a# M... a<<~A_rt!mu::t;d~tJ.
E~~v Type of Bu~ess ic#be- ~nducted .
NO~
I am under 21 years of age
Yes
I am a citizen of the United States Yes/No
Convicted of Felony or Misdemeanor
Yes
No .,/
Number of employees to be engaged
4-
trf2H,...u ~
ct..9.,~
.~.~.~.
v
Name and Address of owner of lands
and nature of the right of occupancy
of the applicant to the use of such
land.
Applicant must file map or plan of real property upon which business
is to be conducted with the following information:
1. Location of fence required.
2. Location of buildings.
3. Location of streets and highways.
4. Location of water and gas mains.
I hereby certify that all the above information is true to the best
of my knowledge and belief and that I will conduct the business
pursuant to the regulations set forth in the o.dinance Licensing and
Regulating Secondhand, Junk and Auto arts Acti ities and Businesses.
~.
~.
I.vr.'i"""jl\ik; (,,;. l..:iMCE
Neary "":..iI:. SIN 01 Now.....
- -n J...~~a
,. ....:.: V~h2-
Sworn to before me this
~day of ~LrV,j~ 19.9..0..
'{-~. {}: ~.~....
<::? Notary Pub ic
Applican
) --..
-"---,
r
DONALD J. GRIM
JEANNE M. GRIM
P.o. BOX 300
CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935
PAY TO THE J. -, A ',/J'-UI-7t. ~
ORDER OF ~~--
h~dK~~
524
k./d
19 ~ t? 50-546121.
~
I'tJ-tI
1$.7~.H J
DOLLARS
~'ftIBlItJPlO'OLI<cotJNTY""TlO"""BANK ~~ (J,A .
~ ...._.0 . ................'0"""0. ~~
MEMO - -
1:02101,051,1;1,1: 1;10 0001151, On. 0521,
~
~:_-~'