Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-117.-8-18 (2) ~.-\ .,.". :\t I\:,- I ~ r t ~ ,~, ~' '1'[\' ~\ ." ) '>;1 J(' " ::j ~.~ . \i '~ "- I \)) SITE PLAN Presubmission conference (within 30 days of written request) Complete application received (within 4 months of presub. conference) APPlicatIon reviewed at work session (within 10 days of receipt) r;wL]Cl ~~ ~~ Applicant advised of necessary revisions (within 30 days of review) Revised sub mission received r;wL]Cl ~~ r;wL]fQKl ~ c::::J I 1', " ~ Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination /2 -/2. -'l't 1- '1- f::,- . I g REFERRED TO: o , ~ \ tt i"Z~ ~ . U \ ~ Vl . "-' \.!- Zoning Board of Appeals (written comments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees I ~e I r;a -;> \',. II < ~ o ... V) - r;wL]f;::;;-J ~~ , Building Department (certification) . Suffolk County Department of Planning Department of Transportation -State Department of Transportation - County Suffolk County Dept. of Health Fire Commissioners [OiJ I~ll ~ /C&R! r;wL]f;::;;-J ~~ r;wL]f;::;;-J ~~ r;wL]f;::;;-J ~~ Sent: Received' 1- RECEIVED: ~EJ M Draft Covenants and Restrictions "ro. OK Filed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape plan ~EJ "ro. OK Lighting plan ~EJ "ro, OK Curb Cut approval [;jEJ "ro. OK Health approval ~@ ~ OK / Drainage plan ~EJ I~ro, OK Reviewed by Engineer ~~ "ro. OK Approval of site plan' -with conditions Endorsement of site'plan ., _.wr...... Certificate of Occupancy inspection ~EJ "ro. OK cine year review ('"''i] fOKl '. ,1.1 /....._ '.rn OK ~, .~ . ':~;..-::\ '-~'_:~J -~~=?:-';~ (y-_.~ -"~'.J\ l,j~li^.~~ PL'ANNING";BOARD ;, ""<' Ji' L ~'-;::>. ~ '}' - .' ,""," / ~ _- IlL. "'.'.~ _ TOr~^ O~;S~;~ ~~rD S u~o~K,:eo>N1Y '.,:>-~. ,J 1_',r/ ~-.~ . Southold. NY 11971 (516) 765-1938 ,~_._--.- . 001 ~ ; : : : I~ SOU fHOLD TOWN PLA~!J1NG BOARD APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application Filing Fee New Use Change of Use Re-Use Extension Revision of an Approved Site Plan--- (Date of Other Specify---- ****************** Date Rec'd of Existing Approval Use Name of Business or Site L<>Vb l..-ANf I\~Ol\.\.(.sII\lJp.( c...o~p Location of Site 't"lA\IV<r' Isr ~({""KI<.,"~ l\li<.lN ~1..I.(,fo"'k. Address of Site, if available Name of Applicant ~\IE. LoAN€. ~t.,C!l\,,".Slrl \lr,) Go~ f> Address of Applicant 8,1,)-,( I 'Is 9 y., "'Trl~"- tJ. Yo, 1 I qg 2..- Telepnone 2..'i ~- ~ 7 {", Person to be responsible, for Construction \iCJ'il'i:'l ~ Rp.'iI\X:)~ Telephone z.." y - 'i( '/ La Applicant's interest in site-check one: Owner of Land X Under contract to purchase P<c:.,~I..ISIIION C<:::lR,f' --- Telephone '2- C\ 'R: - <( If z. D License No. I _" 1( ,l.-<., Telephone 2.-'\ ~- S-4!.~<:> ************ Total Land Area of Site I~() '-'61..-- Sg.Ft. Zone District Existing Use of SitEl2(!:'T1'\U~I'/Nr rnl'lfl.JN~ Proposed Use of Site Gross Floor Area of Existing S'tructure (s) l 'i?1o 91 sgft. Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure (s) 2.1 't ~ sgft. Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) Datum(Specify)U.S.G.S.""'IZAN' S~ L..E;-If,E-l- Other Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception Board of Appeals 1'/0 ~-rJ Sn-m1'.. sgf t. sgf t. 2.(., % If.-. % "- o by Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? )VO If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO AC7ION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. -.J~ . . .I\PPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK H~~ ~ \{ fZ, R FJ "1 ~ :r ~ being duly swo n, deposes_ and says t~at he Icesiaes at z:: S- CA1eQ I &L VYJA-T""',TlA N' _ l in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the a ove property, or that he is the rt,~S'(.)&NV of the Love Ll9iY<!;- (Title) (Specify whether PartRgr~nir A~"'I"'ltIO" C:J;;1l(' which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. rt- signe'(ftJ' ~ [~ (Owner) Sworn to before me this ii' ~' day O! ...1 ~kj r fLC }J"'!A) .' .' (~i!':- ....... f / (Notary Public) 191 t./ --'---t- MELANIE V. BROWN NOIIry PIJlIIc. SIaI8 01 New YOlk No.4l108712 0udlW In UaIt Calnr i} t/ OommMlon ElfpIlIe Cd. 19, 19::J. ,) C Signed v~ (Partner or Corpor /) O,/LvJ . ~6'2 (2/87)-7c . . (" 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Foclises on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. ( DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: o A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures.;.~escribed in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he prepared ~:::.::.~p-;;-.- . A C """ "'""" N "" ",," Ood" .,,"" " ""'" """ '''' """,. "" Ad '" '" ill" .:.: I 2 1994 Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Aeency Title of Responsible Officer ( Signature of Responsible Officer in Le,.ld Agency Signdture of rreparer (If different from responsible officer) - Date . . - . _ART 1-PROJECT INFORMMN Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered .as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona!- information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, 50 indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LO\JE LItNG lOCATION OF ACTION (InClude Street Address, Municipality and County) \'"YI~I'\) t- S. Sl~t:., \l~W NAME OF APPUCANT/SPON,ROR _ LO\)E. LANt; IT ~\<;IIION ADDRESS Boc l~~q CITY/PO vY\ A Tr IT \..l.Q.../ Iv,"I. 1.0 I ~o p NAME OF OWNER (If different) 'Z.. ADDRESS CITY/PO ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION R.~N u\J ^T E C~U r IN (j- (2.);,s. 11'1-\..\ ~I'lI\lT i- :4-1:1 D [.Nt> PL.<X:>!( .." r Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A, if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project 1. Present land use: DUrban OForest both developed and undeveloped areas. Olndustrial ~Commercial Dle~idential (suburban) OAgriculture OOther ~.<.(r- ORural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or [3rushland (Non-i1gricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (l{ock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other p':lVed surfaces Other (Indicate type) BUA-T'I ft ~ acres. PRESENTL Y AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres <lcres acres l.LlS acres 3.<ts-- acres 3. What is predominant Cl. Soil drainage: soil typds) on project site? ~Vell dri1ined 10<:> % of s.ite Oroarly drairwd % of site b. If .:my agricultural Lllld is involved, how many acres of sod are classified within soil group 1 Land Classification System? acrC's. (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Arc there bedrock outcroppings on project site? DYes ~o ~. What IS depth to bedrockl (in feet) OMnderatcfy well drClined ~~ of site through 4 of the NYS L I... 2 . :>. Approximate pcrcenta~;l' of pr.ed project site with slope'): Il!JUlO%.OO 015% or greater "' ,0 LJ-lf}-lS% % 0/ '" 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the StJte or the National Registers of HIStoric PI,ces? DYes q;JNo ( 7.-ls project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks' DYes ~No -( 8. What is the depth of the water table? ~ (in feet) 9. 15 site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes ~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist In the project area? eYes ~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes lQNo According to FtffL-1 <::"A"", Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or DYes tz;(No unusual land Describe forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs. dunes, other geological formations) 13. Is the project 5ite presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes ~'10 If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the communityl DYes l5!J.No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River c..", TC-I.+l) G.:\..U';.. to which it is tributary \4-AR.&J~ 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the Site served by existing public utilities? ('JQ.Yes DNo ( a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b.l If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? 1)J.Yes DYes DNo ~No ~ 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Marh.ds Law, Article 2S-AA, Section 3U3 and 304? DYes ~o 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6171 DYes .JiiiJ.No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wast'b.s? DYes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controllt:d by project sponsor ~~ l./ ~- bP "4/ ~,.I,~ . roject acreage to be developed: ;) ~ acres initi.dly; ~ p ~ ~ acrc" LlJtim~ltely. c Project acreage to remain undeve!opcd a acres. d length of prol~ct, in miles: Iv' J I+- (If appropriate) I c. If the project is an exnanSIOfl, indicate peru'nt of f'xpansiof1 proposed '.3 % f. Nurnhc'r of off-street parking spaces existinn ; prop()~('d f Ef( C.oO.f g. M.Jximurn v(~hir:ular trips genprated per hOllr J 0 (upon compft'tion of project}l h. If reSidential: Number and type of housinl: units: ant' Famdy Two f:umdy ;)cres. L Initially UltImately i. Oirncn<,ions (In feet) of largest proposed structure ": '2...0 height; l-lf Width: (, L. Icngth j. linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? l...1l... ft. -, Mldtiple !".\llldy CondOllllniUrll 3 r",e " 2~ How much natural fIldterld.., rock, earth, etc.) will b(~ removf'u fro.e sIte? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed' DYes DNo ON/A a. If yes, for whilt intcnd.~..... purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation' DYes DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation' DYes DNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? c tons/cubic yards S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes DNo <:> acres. 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 3 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent 8. \Vill blasting occur during construction? DYes 9. (number) I month '7 month phases? DYes 9 s~ 9.)-- p\No year. (including demolition). year. Number of jobs generated: during construction .PQNo <il (1) ; after proJect is complete 7 10. Number of jobs elIminated by this project 11. \Vill project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DYes ~No If yes. explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes [XNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Type ~1\1.e.S.T' C .s: Itvu~ I'l-6r-G i)i.No ,. Q\Yes DNo 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? DYes Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~Yes DNo 16 'Nill the project generate solid waste? ~Yes DNa ~ a. If yes, what is the amount per month " ~ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used' Ci!l.Yes c. If yes, give name --(OWN F Ft t I L.J T Y d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system e. If Yes, explain DNo locatl"t>n ~\.t TCtfaG-~ N-Y J or into a sanitary landf'!l? :JYes I)lNo 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste' a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the Jl1ticipatcd site life? DYes l'jINo tons/month ye;ns. lB. \\lill project use herbicides or pcsticid{~s? DYes IaNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than orl(' hour per day)l DYes Jll/No 20 \,yill project produce op('rating noise ('xceedil1g the local <lI11bicnt noise levels? :JY"S :IqINo 21. Will project restllt in an incred,>e in ~'n!~rgy use'? ~Yes ONo If yes, indicate type(s) _E._L.C Co ,... f:?. I ~ \ 1" 1 . If water supply I') from w':!h. lf1thcal.l' purnplll~~ G1P.ICltyff.R.~ Sc..Do 1tS~,i1lons/rnlll11te. ~ Total J.nticip<lted water llsagl' per ddY ~ E::>O galloll<;/Jay 22. 23. 24. Docs proJCct involve local, St.lte or '-('deral funding' If Yes. explain .... DYes ~o L C 4 '," J- 2S. Approvals Required: . Ite Submittal Date City. Town. Village Board !jiIYes DNo ...,- O\u N 'VR '-t?<i (/ ~ €. ~ { City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes DNo f> I...JPJ ('( (1/ I fY 4- ~ D. S IrifL4/'1 /0 Jq,r- I City, Town Zoning Board DYes DNo City. County Health Department ~Yes *,0 ----- ~ Other Local Agencies DYes DNo Other Regional Agencies DYes DNo State Agencies "jQYes DNo N'''I,S. ~.E.c.._ 1~('1.r Federal Agencies DYes DNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? If Yes, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment Dzoning variance Dspecial use permit Osubdivision Onew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother _ 'wI'iI ~Yes DNo OQ,ite plan 2. \Vhat is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? potential development of the site if developed as h.t<. ~ ~ ~ \,yhat is the maximum permitted by the present zoning? '('t)'TT 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ?~i\ C-n~ ( 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. /s the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 'l'ilYes 0/-.:0 What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a 1;.; mile radius of proposed attion? 'MJI Yn T ~f? +- R.~\b6NT~L ) I " /s the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~ mile? {XlYes DNa If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of--'Je\oYer or water districts? DYes ~Na Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, tire protection)? 'VIYes DNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? eVes DNo 12. \Vil/ the proposed action result in the generation of traffjc significantly above present levels? DYes )QNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional tr"tfic? [::lYes DNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional inform.ltion as may be neeued to clarify your project. If there ,He or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify th.1t the information provid('d aoo\'(' is true to th(' best of AppIIC.lIlt/ 10llsor Ndme La \J,G , S J TJOrV my knowledge. ( Signature Title D,1tc \~\0--.(9r If the ':Iction is in Ih Coast,]1 Arc~l, ,]nd you .He a sf.lte ,]gency, complete the (o.lst,]1 f\ssessment Form before proceeding wifh this assessment. ....... 5 ~ Part ~OJECT IMPACTS AND THEI_GNITUDE Responsihility of lead Agency . General Information (Re3d Carefully) . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. .~ Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it IS also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possIble the threshold of magnitude t.hat would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and threshold:) to answer each question. . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. . In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indIcate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changers) in the prorect to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. . Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per yeilr. . Construction or expansion of a sanitary 1;lndfill . Construction in a rlcsignatcd floodway . Other impacts 2. Will there be an etfect t:, ...ry u:;,qUt~ or lHWSU,lr land (orlllS found on the site) (i.p., cliffs, dunes, geologic.:d formtltions, etc.)UNG DYES . Specific I,lnd forms' -.... 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 Dyes DNo ..... . 0 0 DYes DNo [] 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 r:]Yes DNo r L- '- . IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation law, ECl) DNO DYES hamples that would apply to column 2 . Developable area of site contains a protected water body. . Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. . Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. . Other impacts: 'f 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. . Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. . Other impacts: S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? DNO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. . Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. . Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. . Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. . Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. . Liquid effluent will be conveye! off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. . Proposed Action will Iikelv cau':.e siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to naturdl conditions. . Proposed Action will require the storiJgc of petroleum or clwmic.:lI products greater than 1,100 gallons. . Proposed Action will aI/ow residential lJses in' areas without water and/or sewer services . Proposed Action loca~es commprcial and/or industrial uses which may rct1uire new or expansion of existIng waste trr,llrnpnt tlndlar ,>torJge fJcilities. . Other impacts' ( l 6 Will proposed action ,liter dr<llnagc flow or patterns, or ,>urf ace woter runoiP DNO DYES Examples that wouleJ apply to column 2 . Prorosed Action would change flood water flows ...... 7 1 Small to Moderate Impact o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ... o o o o o o o 2 Potential Large Impact o o o o o o o [J [J [J [J [J o [J o o o o c o n ,~ 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DVes OVes DVes DVes DVes OVes DVes DVes DVes DVes DVes DVes DVes CJVes OVes DVes DYes OVes DYes DYes DYes DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa '" DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa 0,'10 . . Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. . Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. . Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. . Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat Source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. . Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. . Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. . Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fjsh, shellfish or wildlife species. . Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other IOC1Jly important ve~:ctation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL lAND RESOURCES 10 \Vill the Proposed Action affect agricultural Lind resources? (jNO DYES Examples rhat would apply to column 2 . The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agrlcultur<ll land (includ(>s cropland, h.Jyfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard. etc.) -.... 8 -- ---- 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNa o [J DYes o o DYes o o DYes o o DYes o o DYes o o DYes o [] DYes o o o o DYes DYes o [] DYes o o DYes o c DYes o o DYes DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNa DNa . c. . Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. . The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land . The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources' DNO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum In Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. . Proposed land uses, or project components viSible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ( . Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views l:nown to be important to the area. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance' DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. . Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. . Proposed Action will Occur in iJn area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inv('ntory . Other impacts: c IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action .Jffcct the quantity or qU.Jlity of existing or future open spaces or rf>creational opportunltws? Examples that would apply to column 1 DNO DYES . The permanent forC'c!osure of a future recreational opportunity. . A rll,ljor rl'auction of In oren space irnportJrlt to the community. . Othl'r imp,lcts: ..... 9 1 2 3 Small to' Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 C DYes DNa 0 C DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa o o DYes DNa o o DYes DNa o o DYes DNa o o OYe~, DNa o o DYes DNa " o o DYes DNa o o DYes DNa o o DYes DNa o o DYes DNa o o o o o o DYes DYes DYes DNa DNa DNa , . IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. . Other impacts" IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply' DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. . Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16, Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action' DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. . Odors will OCcur routinely (more than one hour per day). . Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. . Proposed Action wi/I remove natural barriers that would act as a nOIse Screen. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety' DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of haLardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, r.1diation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. . Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly re(]ctrve, radioactive, irritJting, infectious, etc.) . Storage Llcilities for one million or mor(-' gallons of Jiqulfied natural gJS or other flammahle liquids . Proposed action may result in the exc,lvation or other drsturbance wit/lln 2,000 feet of J srt.. used for the dr'>posal of solid or h,l/Mdous waste. . Otl1f'r rmp;lcts; ..... 10 1 Small to Moderate Impact o o o o o o o o o o o ... o o o o o 2 Potential Large Impact [] o [J o [J [J o [] [J [J D o D o [J [J 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo "V , DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DND L '- DNo r ~ . 18. (- IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? DNO DYES hamples that would apply to column 2 . The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. . The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. . Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. . Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. . Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. . Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) . Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. . Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. . Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? DNO DYES 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes DYes { If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa DNa '\'.. Responsibility of lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be pot~1rttally large, even if the impact(s) mi)Y be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to;1 small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information availahle, decide jf it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consjder: . The probability of the impact occurrjn.l~ . The duration of the impact . Its irreversibility, including perm.lnently lost ri'SOLHCt'S of value . Whether the impact can or will be controlled . The regional con<;('qucnce of tlw imp<lct . Its potential divergence from locll nCt'<Js and goals . Whether known objectlof1,) to the projt'ct rcf,ltl.' to thiS Impact (Continue on .IttJchrnents) l ...... 11 , ( ( l 14.14-11 (2'87)-9<: . 617.21 Appendix B Environmental Quality Review . ~ St<1te Visual EAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: . A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? . An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? . A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? . State Parks? . The State Forest Preserve? . National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? . National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? . National Park Service lands? . Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? . Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? . A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? . A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? . Municipal park, or designated open space? . County road? . State? . Local road? Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) 0- V4 V4"/' 1;'.3 3-5 5 + o 0 000 o o o o .... o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ^. o o o o o o o o o 2. Is the visibility of the project ~;CiJSOnilr? (i.e., ~;creencd by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) DYes DNa 3. t\re any of the reSOl:l'.'CS checked III question I used IJY the public during the time of year during which the project '~'il! be visible? DYes DNa .... .. -. ,"-.. ~- DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally 'describe the surrounding environment. Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *'/2 mile DYes ONo *1 miles DYes DNa *2 miles DYes ONo *3 miles DYes DNa Within *1/4 mile * 1 mile o o o o o o o o o o o o o o J 1 \. o o o o o o o o o o o o o o * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. "\t_ r < EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. '":'w.. . CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is Activity Travel to and from work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At worksite Other Daily o o o o o o , " 2 Weekly o o o o o o FREQUENCY Holidaysl Weekends o o o o o o Seasonally o o o o o o c C J RECEIPT S3dtS JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Phone: 516-765-1801 DATE /1.Q.e..., / 'I 19 '1'? RECEIVED OF: ?s0.J-<-'-<-. of <l./],U..- (lr,t<..uA-J::<-Vl<"- C1'LfJ $ G 0 ~ , 300 FOR: 42J...o./'t/Y/h '1 f1d .-::I~ - .J.-i-b- {JJ"'/l / ~S;:b f3 1 ~.4~ o CASH c/ I/'h A),A . .-C-€HECK -# q aD b BY: Z!.L ~ \ \, . ~. ~ I<K.. Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 Albert J. Krupski. President John Holzapfel. Vice President William G. Albertson Martin H. GarrelI Peter Wenczel BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Planning Board FROM: Southold Town Trustees RE: Love Lane Acquisition Corp. SCTM #117-8-18 DATE: January 27, 1995 The South01d Town Board of Trustees has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. Please any supporting information that our Board might need regarding this application. I ill rn@rnow~ ~211995 illl $OUlHOlD TOWN PLANNING BOARD . . Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett O~owski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards ,4c1~;ffO~ .y ~,;.') v ~." .,~" ..'" - .? "-'" -.?~'~, .< ..' \\ .~ ...J,.. ,....<.... .......... ~.. ~. ',' - _ :..1 ::I -, ~ , . . 'j . . -_ 'i ',," .~: ." i;P~ ;;';>.""J'" . ~ ~~~~#;,/~"-.'J ,::~:,:) ~c.~~;JJ"- Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 10, 1995 Henry Raynor P.O. Box 1459 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed site plan for Love Lane Acquisition, Corp, SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Dear Mr, Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 9, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southo/d Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. 01/11 )jf/#'/ U[~~rd G. Ward { Chairman enc. . . Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett O~owski, Jr. Mari< S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards '- "', Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 South old, New Vori< 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant January 9, 1995 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Love Lane Acquisition, Corp. SCTM#: 1000-117 -8-18 Location: Main and First St., New Suffolk SEQR Status: Type I Unlisted ( X ) ( ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This proposed site plan is to add a 281 square foot addition to an existing restaurant. . . Page 2 SEQRA Negative Declaration - Love Lane Acquisition, Corp. January 9, 1995 Reasons Supporting This Detennlnatlon: This project involves the addition of a 281 square foot food storage area to an existing restaurant. A restaurant is a permitted use in this Marine \I zone, thus the proposed action is consistent with zoning. An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. There has not been any correspondence from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765~1938 cc: Langdon Marsh, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Judith Terry, Town Clerk South old Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Board of Trustees Applicant ENB ~'it:>.."""~''""'''''' JHrl lJ3 0'3::. 1-;--:51 P.l . . Su~ RIC HENRY E. RAYNOR PO BOX 1'tS9 320 LOVE LANE MATTITUCK, N.Y. 11~52 S16-298-8't20 516-298 2127 (FAX) JAN. 9, 1995 TO: RICHARD WARD, CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 RE: LOVE LANE ACGluISITON CORP SITE PLAN DEAR MR. WARD: PuRSUANT TO THE J:lLANNING BOARDS REQUEST I HAVE CONTACTEL' THE SUFFOL.K COUNTY DEPT. OF ENV. HEAL. TH OFFICE. ,I I~E~,~E~E,9 JdlTH PETER AKRAS THE PROPOSED STORAGE AREA ADDITION AT THE NORTH WEST COANER OF THE BUIL.OING. MR. AKRAS INDICATED THAT, AS THE SEATING CAPACITY WIL.L. NOT BE INCREASED, NOR WOUL.D THE ADDITION INTERFERE wITH ANY SEPT::C WASTE SYSTEM, THE PROPOSED ADDITION WOULD NOT COME UNDER ANY REGUL.ATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION BY HIS DEPARTMENT. I HOPE THIS ANSWERS THE PL.ANNING BOARD QUESTIONS wITH REGARD TO THIS PROJECT. SHOUL.D YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE 00 NOT HESITIHE IN CONTACTING ME. YOURS TRULY, -JJ-'-"j <L./<~~)?An. of~~~ ~F~' illum1u m JAM 10_ SOUTHOLO TOWN Pi.,;N!\:'I;~G BO~RD - - . . :;MIJ>~ ~i< Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 Albert 1. Krupski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President William G. Albertson Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: R.G. Kassner FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr. t-.s'l\. RE: Love Lane Acquisition Corp SCTM #1000-117-8-18 DATE: Decetnber 21, 1994 The Board of Trustees has no objection to the Planning Board taking lead Agency. However, we would like to comment on the runoff and septic system location. '\oJ~@~OW ~I IW OEe 2 ,. I\!U SOUTHOlD TOWN PlANNING BOARD . . Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, N_ York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PLANNING BOARD oF-FleE TOWN OF SOUTHO~D j ~yt(4 I~. /71Lj Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Articie 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment. Form (EAF) to assist you in your respgnse.\ 1) /I r.... Project Name: /,.'JlF' 'k-" <L?~~..., ~ Requested Action: 0/ ~ ., SEQRA Classification: (X) Type I ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: ~ G. J(IJ S Sd E A (516) 765-1938 .' ::',i:'~:.,f.,_ . ---=~~;:".--. . . Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (X> This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( > This agency has no objection to. your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( > Other (see comments below) Comments: Tills 1'6s; TIT!! .1' AN r f11 ;1 f? / /i /J /,/; Tit t ~ is /!.,>s.:>c://fI&I) /'VITI! rl- 111/f-f1/'"/.1 11 Z O/Y C, ~:2' "~ to, "'o"ct th; offi" foc f,rth" 'ofo"",'oo_ IJ.ri::!t~;!I fflt0( J.... Chairman cc: BOal d af Appeals ~ Board of Trustees .:jt' Building Department South old Town Board '* Suffolk County Department of Health Services * NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany Suffolk CeulIly Depi:ldllltml ur Public VVol'k"s- *' U.S. Army Corp of Engineers .New-'t'erk-State-f>epartment af Transportation- "Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 ~~ - ;~:"""~~...,_.. . . Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Marl< S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New Yorl< 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 13, 1994 Henry Raynor P,O. Box 1459 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed site plan for Restaurant Love Lane Acquisition, Corp. SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 12, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board. acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. start the coordination process on this Type 1 action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely,'!' {iJj,Llcl ~H' Richard G. Ward Chairman . . Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Or1owski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards lJ~ffOll(.~ ~...... ~ !if . ..i ~ Q~:' '-'~. ~ en .. .' :e ~ ...... i, ~ . ,,,J ~ '~'. ~... 0/0,/ .'.... ....~ .'C .' .. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765.1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 13, 1994 Henry Raynor P.O. Box 1459 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Site Plan for Love Lane Acquisition Corp, First Street, New Suffolk SCTM# 1000-117-8-18 Zoning District: Marine II (Mill Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has received your letter of December 12, 1994, concerning the proposed addition to the restaurant. The following comments, additions, changes are required before the Board can proceed with its review: 1. Are any changes proposed to the existing restaurant, (other that the addition I. 2. Elevation drawing of addition. 3. Outdoor lighting cannot exceed fourteen feet (14'1 in height on existing poles as per Town Code, . . If you have any questions. or require further information. please contact this office. ~r Y.~! !/ / lA:~'ItJ;;;w~r7hf .<- Chairman cc: Thomas Fisher. Senior Building Inspector In Charge ~~.';""-' f~'" - SERVI,'TIIH.r, . ~ ,fJ<- I.J.-(c, /9'1 ~'. ~~;f~ , ~. ~ri--' ~~'::f~~~~~ ~~'1' ~~ >4-- 0< E. Ir-- F . ~r~)~~' ;;:2h~ ~I . . ~. R'<::. SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: /2/8{Qt.f DOli Fe.-ile.y-- SENDER: SUBJECT: Love... La.. A-c.~. SCT:.I#: 117-8-/8 com'IENTS: C[ S " te.. P Itlht5 - / .s To? (e..s tQ.Ur-a>1 f _ . " ., .... ...... _::.~~ ':':"""'r'~ ~. ..~M>",-. ~. ',,_.,.~-., .~'~ f~ .Jl... SERVI..,TIIH,,,: , Si.dJF /(/C ~ 4 tv -<~~, ~,~. ~. '-/ s: ~~ I~O r ~b-l) -- 2!Jflll ~~Jo'-s ~,3S C J G-<::>',3r ( ,'" dito.",e<..) ~ 00 ~ ml ~ 0 w ~ ~...i I'll' _ 5/994 HUll l...I SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD . , ~ALe' RK... SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: 12/'/'1'-1 SENDER: Henry Ray('()Y" SUBJECT: Lo'le LaOe..It'fMSihon SCT:.I#: 111- 8- 18 cmU-IENTS: q prints '. .., -... [i) rn 00 rn u w rn .~ lJ1J IE I \994 _ ~ ..... SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING ROARO .."....~-~."......,..... ~-,. - -,-..,~."" Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kennelh L. Edwards i.-;~:Y::~~-~~';;Jl,~~---::~ J,-..;'> '~'. .....,,, ,1--' -'"' - ,','/. 1:\. d ,,- j{' r ,x. 1;:, M :'~_"., ' : """') ..:\ 'N.., ~.5 .' t . ~\: ~"" .~. (,. "7e Ii '\' '" ,r" ~~... ;i"",-' - ..-f:! "i '.;..0- '-"'~. ~-- .,'" (\J '. .,?':, ~.....,,,"\....',(I r,.."" "- ..lo(} ~ '-:"'/ "I -,;>.,.." ';.>;:..... -. . i ">" ~"'vJ) .<j77;:CCCLi- ~ . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Dee_"er 1,1994 H_... Rl1IpJNer P.O. B_ 1469 MalIU,"*. NY 119611 Re: SUe PIaa fer L_ L.ae Afl9IdriIioto Cerp. Fhl SIreet, N_ Saffolk SCTH.1000-11'1-8-18 Zoa',.. DUllrkt: M.riae H (MIl) D_r Mr. R.per: To_", IlIe PI_a"" B_nl etfke re1j61t!ed .'ae eopiea of. .1Ie phla ""-'Nfl . _e .,.... ...""'_.' hi I."eled "Prop__ IInd Fleer AUUioto". TIle ......,..,.. .... not --JHUIIe4"" . _pleIed .ue phla .pp' o-.l 1-, EAF and ""-k fer IIIe a_ P' op_fJIl. TIle preele-'r/ ......UktI f- refer 10 . ,.,0 .,.... preJeeI, IIIe, ef#We _not lie _ed for IIIe pl._ ."".UktI I..". We .111I __ _ file _ '_pMk applkalioto fer. ,.,0 .,.... realaaranl fJIUU,... .If".. .".,. 10 .nU.." .,Ill Uud applkalloa, p'-e .en" . leIIer retpI"",,,,. "'--re of"'" file, _elnd",. . a_ applkalloa fona, _..,.....-IfJIl _._...ent, .ntI .."pl'-'Ion f- fer IIIe ""'/1"'''''' of IIIe -u.I",. real..rant. .If ,,0.11- .a" ~,,_, er rep're furlller -f-&l,.., plealle _al,"" III1e of1ke. ~, / I ~Vflf.rfl./:L~~~ CII_'na_. De: TIIo_ Fleller, Senior B..""".. .la.peeler .-.~"'.. I " '~ ~ ~~.. ...... ~_.- . , ~Ftt.e RK.. SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: /2/ ' Iq4.j SENDER: Henry RayroY' SUBJECT: L..ove La.Oe../t'-fMsinon SCT:,g: 111- 8- 18 I. CO:'!NENTS: q prints .., ..... 00 m ~ m ::, ~ 00 I SOUTHOLO T,W:N I PLANNING RUeRD ';";~,.,J.tli...,-,_,,"-~. ~ ... ."~.' ,.., _..;;~t-._..""~,.~:.......~,, '"...,..~._~~..,...,., '-"'.. . .. :~'>;"~"i>.~~~'::/;''':~'':';~:~:';;'~:;;' ~,.~~~..'- '..;, ,,""~'- ,,', ~ ~ Svbi. R.b<;;. SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER COMMENTS: DATE: JI/qAlf SENDER: ))011 Fe.i/fI\.. SUBJECT: Love... La'f\~ Itc.~S;fjh\. SCTM#: 1/7-8-/8 si~ e,bn a.,pr'. (fit (te.-) 9 COpIes si-fc. pla.f\ I CJJP'f floor plan I If e-Ie.- vcut-i oYlS ~..,... ... .... fD)m@rnDwrn~ lJI] NOV I 0 /994 ~ ..... SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ~ LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans -= =. ---- ~- - SIPFile Tyoe: Proiect Tyoe: Site Plans Status: -E-.'k121'4e'GD S<;;TM #: 1doo - 117.-8-18 Proiect Name: Love Lane ACQuisition Coro. Address: Main & First Streets. New Suffolk Hamlet: New Suffolk ADoUcant Name: Love Lane ACQuisition Com. Owner Name: Love Lane ACQuisition Coro. Zone 1: Aooroval Date: N ~7 A~00 cv SCANNED NOV '3 3QI Records Management OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: Main & First Streets. New Suffolk SC FilinQ Date: C and R's : Horne Assoc: Rand M Aqreement: SCAN Date: i' M ugA'i « -Y-•-,"' lUl rlA'",1' R wlanK, ", v GSI .DAE:b- Or- P 12T`e , 'x. 4 5 6C / 15o, 2.5,2 S,F, v ,. . / Tis X MAP rto t I R2: - 11"1 -- Ce ' 18 iL�4 �—> L6NoowM�rz - Lwe 4WF- bCQUIg( 71oN C-"RIZ P � P,o, tXzc 1459, MpTffS�GK, NY + 1 4Ft 1lt�j �-. PJlrcwF4�.� MDT`Lltlist. 10 - ' hmn✓' x . w , i r r. N, k' u.m+N swao a �a�dlF�- {�.J' VOM -4 i ✓ y i EXISTIr1lq 15'jY ReSTPLVhh4T' 5. 1=• .•G4a i I r ' ^1 � .I/_ fgwwNcWb'� � ' ,J�7v - - - _ - _-:� r� 1 �� boDl'TIoN 281 5.F• �h 1:•.� ISTIN� 1�hc«�41N�. �..�++erP I Soo S,F. 101r�rvMET� j' �% E-_x I *T-Im "n, P--Cwnt -PDTDL LOT Gr�V via ✓ 424 q - �' j � % lAT /✓C7JE1CJSrCgE. �OJ'D°foMAW • J '1 ,8 °/o '� �� � � 0 ✓' PR.n R�sV—=o 2No pLcM - IZEs7DuRdtNT :r-. KEY M4 ? i" I rJ d L t cgwtnN�ta �teu s a sbNcs v R� Tdu Rb-r-t T i !s F I o0 MIPs x I 1 5 3 �s�, ,2 ST4<rL5 # KAI1Eb,5GNY� wb{1 - uf / I MC*GHItiI� SNAP 1500 SiF, r 1 J.'5 a� �R 41. Fk � 'ptle wN�retoCocW=� st�tlo l o TD'rL>L o 4p RCTjI C)E'..c> bb., �i « . ' WbTQ++ IN j�Dly CBpWNPINE To GDDR�E.E.SnWO _ €`� � _ ' 1 0 0 0 � / QI R.E�u1�� '• 1 �' � 51:00 5,�. ( l"�' r. � ,� � I' � « : a Hal Ws'r A PIco0wTMm 4.4 664-ow 5UKfbCE I /I r! _—�' o ° �TJR. MLU A F 1T " L 6;j !N s . G AO p bRE� 21d�i F, k f RGaMFbLL 544 Go.,'(�� Nt�� A912 ur�HT _ To w�rtr�Ir 4m WA-Irls o �J ' �Q �a L � yyr�wo,cc � ,.fW '- b73Y� (2) ID LECG+dI Ra01S X 2 .k taE�P EFf.T7 +v5�o GU• F(4 ", QL " LI!^}tT$ (�) HIG14t W `ES�uRE �pIl1M 4co W°Tf- ISO WaT� I ,>Y � bNIT + �., S' MFiWbo - L{ 5 (R) Hl H F- 1;eEMGVEIa TIF- -M t�r-- DgecTm(> *Mw-6pz SjE:EcT vwr. xzueTlksRVtOE ` IT W.r't� MOSTILLLtCgF-nW-q MCIL.NRF.l-1 AVIYCD4r Tt6. �PTIG (CNK - IOI(� x 4' LIQl71D 3�PiF� 20517 ► _t`1 i ;I - --_ �y�o/ '�_- - -- o &I 9 p �4)Idj 5 2Io LIz?," 13'ft S .-P, }�pr 'E�•'1�1rIG� ' 4xfo IZE�Tb+�R.dt-1'T Wbu.. AGM -TO SER ) d ' __�_ f .. '�/p��� E-- �L. ' T , ` - k4 +• P�. � V H1461 _NOTS \,. � I�Iki4 ,, �4LS7 WIp(N '• 22' W IDS ��_1 ��v �."1 �'0 �k tW, 41d ' Sf�T4,1n STALLS '. Ipr x ?h' i 1PVL.v wr�wrr aPac D�PNbUT bvItlG� �, , za Taw 10'x 26` W !MA S' &D- FEAT 1LCGeA45 b-1SL-E. j PA4NTEt;� RaR 114& L- N ES To{- t�-OE ; SbC-4A SFbcE -2, +tavS o s s MhG'o ItiaE .PPRrN1D.PlQ-(T 911 1-4H CH bISPI-bN 74S IMTV2NQT1CNa^L 4" ON-fQ ?bKEN ff&W SURVEY #:W ROtMzAcK,VbN TuYL #1 ( j P©VI�IG� ad ice\ jol-a � IR, 1> .4 � �y �w �h N 4'3�' E, X 50,0' CV , IE1CIoJ1 . wig i a4' r tA L z � 1eGH 1Nla �xLS �) 22 tx? v i ��� 40 LP j _ 1t I L � < o imcbtc�tg srN ✓✓x I$S t 4 4}n4>•!! `� DAPI AJGGI I`1N 1.:1 .0 '1 i—` LE 11G , 'w { f � T..J V 1 •1l � 1 ��� � I I iry i SS -r M3 O ' Trorl �� r TI pp" 5 , - - - 27 . 01 ' d"a N c�� &' no r. 211 .0' d , '�"" I r s t n k_ 11 '�IN4 4 �le, h .W z _ , r. I tt } is ' a r , . � 7 1+1.bmk GSIu . r y Y 11 F G,�. .1AJarp TC Alk J �bRE�, r- ( } TY : s eco- - turd1 s� 1A. X ' 11-7 - 18Ml wo , 14D , . L&404:::>IrJo WMER - 1.04E LN-4m 6CQUlSlTlnt �P'•o •' : .aav� ��,��" klNuesk; wiz 4>' co•6•[ caNc, (�u.15. �`- _.,. 9rMRTfIT�G14, 14Y � ;� ✓, p.o. �, 145 Y�/�'., �' F.+ ,- ��Yr+v + O V• C1POV�1_ ✓ / //� % MY9r II � d, ' 4 N (c�tWN WAfeR, P� u iSTlq_ _ ` Idplc�t�Tvw I - 'I / ° i;x SrlKra Mhculrle S++vp � s•F, u 'PD TG L, k-OT OOVV�64 !✓ 54Irob s. �• " L'C7r GGT/LnbS E. 630% MtaY• 1 2 ,Co •--� ,rte ' L,+-� ��.�. ° ti0 �I-CC-'� ' 1�.E�1•lau�t�l-� ,� �a nv .,,1„ -+,✓.T til.. )U'� - VF✓`�' 14�Y Mt>t � - �R�+nE Isi .Etr4 / � ''S �r- ! ted' r� utR �r.� •• : ' �`�' '��" Z (� FZSSrau rZ.a r-1 r 3Q'-35SrF. - loo 34. 4• Mb-CIANC-- nU � <{ / ° � MaR,1 Nr, Is st.tPs x 1 15 � • �` . U d J v � SiAOF I�dD Ioco s�• - I . 5 � ' �2 ` �dO1 E{•,�, t h ToTb>L 951 rjRcvMDWbTt z ) y� ° ; PRC�/Id✓ C7 Clucuxxs 3bccessir use 5S R>-� - r , o v {l2OV Iti I bt, �TOR, M bRD1r { bC� f� T�dTt� '; j - ��Tr-, Lr H7 i,dFa �� � r2ec� uI>rLc� � t F , i} ° i PR.QP• "LNOfL=-REstDUKNIT 15(o75,F. x 2"RC1NFbLL 251 GU,Pri trf"g ffor'i y _' t kGt 1 tT - TO tZ FMh N 4M WsTiS y"' o o r 1 Com/ 1 T= L� i (2) ID C LECUAInYa 'SOLS % 2.� F�C .GT4\� 2-74 GU• i*r, r • : WN, '� N�+d4L. LIfr�N TSi C�-) HI(�µ i�+t�6UfLE�OIUM �1•Cr� WP1'� ( ' � �� p �bti{ ITbfL� ESI •. : "' ` ` P t U(9"Ts C2) RtGtkt 9*16M I50 WG'(I+ - IdT : �4&4T- 'z e;P- �k 1 o fowaW[> (4te Sa �cT o a3T 1 MCa NITS s�M ro ft�F- t e-mo vel:) 5,1TIs w'crK No sPlLk. L1r T+*1 , a�c-j � e c� l a per;. s' I as es tom. r s a= s.� .+ sir. c�uEeu k vl°mss ; rPTIG (DNI4 10'�p x 4' LIQUID' S 2D50 L hl' µo 2v- 22 ,,� ., �a1ZFASETRbP (o'd) x 5' L.IQulo 1 1000 61DL.• ; fs3Gl nl 4'x!o' i� 444T WbtL5cN -TbtEglaC LEriC141N(a pC�XS• C4) lo'cp x 2,7 BFFrD 3'fi S,F , u WbL-L- SIGH- eJ5WF- Loa:.'(ION - a � �- OWW� �M°Ft•'R' "�' . �•^"" .., r ,4''a n tvefx'- '"� ------- Y f h' a �j S 1JAt?fH ' 2�' WIDE ir�tcrk �T�> �s Io' x2c�' f1 .> 4Z l.• `i lll ask. c ' pR1�IN� spa�r5 s ASpHbUTPVINC� Noun rnK� a 4 ( K.0 ' 20' W ITN, 3' bCTV .ENT iSGG dISL E i {�AINreP ExiT I ttiCq 1 O —�� �� '.a:'+'Y?FirKrlt 1, L.INfc5, To � b-UE ; Fps•-A SRac� Tb +WVE, - 1 h M'dGNiI IE4c�Fa to tvlDtlikF 9iloil WFIYGH b15F1A2 THE IM{{�2r1lT�CNaL -a� tl % Mto7L b 4c � sira� lr ? • * I s 40 '��/D -F!'.�4EN j�Ll�ri SIJ(�vE4' �}l ROI�'ACXv VaM-N`{}L i �.G. � �;,h;�dt Ali li �a' � N / � � � •--'r s µi'', 3 198T- , I . � � '� °'� �' Fiv�s� sae• N,4°33' �. � 50.0' EXi�T. 4Qr y� 14b4 6 N r POLE • • i nrz,r� • N-I�N �..�-l`� nor-�,�. /�' _ c� ` N _ _- - _ - - I � 2� �. V =la�TdTIc:) -w L ' 1 , f G,.. y" 1J I� _Z Z n I.-E�GH.11.lCAl,S — v 2k �° V u deI + v GhTcs r N 17, Lin Em I EXIST{ h•ICa .a ' �' � , I. L cJ a U . tD ll 1 Z I I L } } '�`l • tT til , c,J° 00•• E 2 11O2, r •dc' � . beat " 1, :° r _ T c � V t : - a I � - r i F � Iti1aw,. - _ ,•� � al i 1 :ego- s millg I - — I �reielWr�fiil�LN�i�iin�iYl • ..riYli ar"rile`r`Gi'iii�rilrii�i�a�rrliii'i�Y%7rlW - - _ i. _ . 6iWiiW�iirer' �witW � - _ - _ _ . �"' ' .• }Jn, �'� �' 1 �I �� BdF ]� .� 1� } '+IV' c p !:. .ily S�^ul TINK 16i °w _.ash ns�YS..nyy.�..yy. e no " 0 ;P .l we _ �! 3 _ _ -,.►. � �i"`'�in,� , ?REf -n�!„IR� —v,p�.—ri�d�,�1r , u we^�srwwwe/rrdrw.' .,.�. �� «-+sv ...r _ �.-.•.�[^•'. , �� . ...� m,�...., �-mw.ami _ __ 'L I� ' � _ — ��rS" � H ''�VS� Al mom — —_—�•— .::nwsui'wewaeunw�remuar —• a..aswm�aevrm. O err rn hl Rim IN luOWN� wi :111 fill m k � in„ 21 yl➢i1 � ' m'OffYi7�tl¢ ^oirr�d !rsa 1 I I R W ' - r.� 3 0 - m I Elio '&,J MWE- OWN p iGiifi. ,.. _■--R -..�A. ,.'rte_ "�' - •� d'- 7 . � ..=�Pe, rer °b�!` �, ,Ew—( W ""'.F'r.:r ri '. IF-;7� - �, i'f?k2Pk� . . �•:ua .:.,-.as' �_rry .. .. 5''r h, I