HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-05/25/1972 APPEAL BOARD
MEMBER
Robert W. Gillispie, Jr., Ch~irm.~n
Robert Bergen
Charles Grigonis~ Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
Fred Hul~e, Jr.
Southold Town Board of Appeals
SOUTHOLD, L. I,, N.Y. 11-9'71
Telephone 765-26'60
~OB~HOLD, ~0~ BOARD OF API~A~-~
May 2~, 1972
A regmla~ meeting of the S~athold Town Board of Appeals was
held at 7:30 P.M., Tharsday, May 25, 1972, at the Town. 0ffi¢~,
Main Read, ~outheld, New York.
There were present: Messrs: Robert W. Gillispie, Jr., Chairman;
Robert.Bergen; Charles Grigenis, Jr.; Serge Doyen, Jr.; Fred Hulse,
J~. (8.10
Also present: N~. Howard Terry, Building !nspecter.
7:30 P.H. (E.D.~.T.), upon appliea%lem of Robert Parkin,
Bay Avenue, ~rient, New Ye~k, for a variance in accordance with
the Zeming ~dinanee, ~tiele IZI, Eeotiem 300 0-2, fe~ a permit
te bmild a swimming peel in side yard. Location ef preper~y:
ne~h side Bay Avemme, Orient, New York, be~mded north by Qutlty;
east by lauds mow er fermer!Y ef Petru~ci; south by Bay Avenue;
amd west by land new er formerly ef Kelly.
TEE CEAIRNAN: I wi~h te point est that this applicatie~
has bee~ tml3reperly pmblt¢ized. In the absence ef eu~ Tewm
Attorney I have ~heeked with Counsel in Riverhead and they agree
that this~has been improperly p~blicized. The location should
be Cm%~hegue, New Ye~k instead ef @rient, New York, as Shewm.
O~ metie~byNr. Gillispie, seeended by Mr. Grigenis, it was
~LVED that hearimg em application of Robert Parkin,
Omtehegue, New Ye~k, be postponed until 7:30 P.N., June 15, 1972.
Veteef the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigenis,
_Doyen.
Se~theld Tewm Boa~d of Appeals -2-
Nay 25, 1972
PUBLIC NEARING: Appeal No. 1533 - 7:40 P.M. (E.D.S.T.),
upe~ applieatie~ ef Jack Driseell, Ne~h Oakwe~d D~ive, Laurel,
New York, for a v~iamoe i~ aece~d~ee wtt~ ~ Ze~i~g
~tiele III, ~etie~ 30I, f~ pe~mlssiem te divi~e am~ use as
sep~ate lets Let Nos. 1 am~ 2, Map ef ~altai~e Estates,
View Avers, ~ltai~e Way, Mattituek, New Ye~k. Fee paid $15.00.
The Chairma~ epemed the hearing by reading the applioatiom
fera variamoe, legal motiee ef hearimg, affidavit attestimg te
its pmblIeatien im the official mewspapers~ amd metice to the
applicant.
THE ONAIRNAN: Is there amyeme presemt who wishes to speak
for this applieatiem? _
MR. ~AOK DRISCOLL: These lets were emma filed map, the same
as pesstbly fifty ether filed ma~s ia Eeuthold Tewm. t cam met
mmderstam~ why they were met imslmded ~m exemptions as I believe
that these leSs as well as a let ef others should have beem
imeluded. I sam met nmderstamd why t~ey were emitted. (Mr. Driscell
presemted a sketch ef the two leSs te the Board, amd a diseussiem
felloweS).
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyome else present who wishes te spe~k
this applieatlem?
(There was me response.)
THE CNAIRMA~N: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this~ a~plieatie~?
(There was mo respemse.)
THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any qmestiems?
MR. R~BERT BERGEN: ~e you goimg to ~se these lots the way
they are shewm em the sketah or are you geimg te reverse them?
MR. DRISCOLL: They Will be used as shown. It would be tee
m/~.h efa ~roblem to reverse them.
After imvestigatiem amd imspectiom the Bear~ fimds that the
applisamt requests ~ermissiem te div~e amd use as separate lets
Nos. 1 amd 2, Map ef Baltaire Estates, Mattitmek, New York. The
Beard fimds Sha~ it is a reasonable division of property amd
agrees wi~h the reasemimg of the applioamt.
The Bear~ fim~s ~hat striot applicatiom ef the O~dimamce will
predume prae~ioal dtffiemlties er ummeeessary hardship; the hard-
shi~ ereate~ is umique amd would mot be shared by all properties
alike ia the immediate vi~imlty ef this property amd im the same
use distriot; amd the vaelamce does observe the spirit ef the
0~diman~e amd will met ~hamge the eharaeter of the district.
Eeutheld Tew~ Beard ef Appeals
-3- May 25, 1972
0n metiem by F~. Bergen, seconded hymn. Grtgenis, it was
RESOLVED Jack Driscell, North Oakweed Drive, Laurel, New Ye~k,
be GR~A~2ED permission as applied for te divide amd use as separate
lets Let Nos. 1 and 2, ~p ef ~altaire Estates, ~eu~d View Avenue,
~alSaire Way, ~atti~uek, New Yo~k.
Vote ef the Boa~d: Ayes:- N~ssrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigenis,
Doyen.
P~BLIO ~A~NG: A~peal Ne. 1532 - 7:5~ ~.M. (E.D.S.T.),
mpen application ef Albe~t Ga~bade, Jr., Imdian Neck Lane, Pecenic,
~ew York, fe~ permissiem to offset an umdersized let and build a
eno family dwellimg amd a va~iamee in aceerdamce with the Zoning
O~dinamoe, A~iele IIi, ~ectiem 301, amd Article II, Section 203,
subd. 3. Lecatien ef prepe~y: west side ef Indian Neck Lane,
Peeenic, ~ew York, bemnded north by lamd mew er formerly ef A.
Sacce; east by I~iam ~eckLa~e; south by Vaitis; amd wes~ ~y
la~d mew er formerly ef A. Saece. Fee paia $15.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by readimg the application
fe~ a va~iamce, legal notice ef hearing, affidavit attesting to
its publicatiem in the official mewspapers,~and notice te the
applicant.
~E C~AIRMAN: Attached te the application is a su~ey ef
Alden W. Ye~r~, ~ate~ ~ay 22, 1969 am~ May 1~, 19~1, i~ima~tmg
t~t the f~emtage em Im~i~Neek Lame ~s 275 feet, the depth ef
~ ~eel e~ t~ s~rlybemmd~y is 232 plus feet; em ~
me~e~lybeu~y it is 231 ~s feet; across t~ westerly
beam~y it is 294 ~s feet. The property is slightly i~re~lar
i~ s~e. 0m t~ semthe~ly pe~tiem ef the~eper~y the~e is a
hemse ~d eme e~ two eutbuildi~s.
T~E O~AtRMA~: Is t~ere amycne present who wishes to speak
this appliea~ie~? ~ ~
~. AI~ERT ~d~E, JR.: I have a very unique situation.
It is dtffieml~ te describe. ~ywife is incapacitated, my parents
are eld a~ my fa~er ~as cataracts an~ can, t d~ive. T~ey live
In a big he, se in Nassau Oeanty and have mebedy te maintain it.
I ~ave been t~yimg te ~an into the city as eftem as possible but
we ~ave t~ee small children. I ~heught if I could get them out
here w~ere I could take care ef ~hem I coui~ alleviate some ef
the difficulty ef this situatiem. I have tried, but ~ave met been
successful, te acquire
~ CHAIR~: Is there amyone else presemt who wishes to
speak for this application?
(~ere was ne respomse. )
Eemt~eld TewaBea~d ef Appeals -4-
May 25, 1972
T~E 0NAIRMAN: Is t~ere anyene presemt whe wishes te speak
against this applieatieL?
(There was ne respemse.)
After imvesttgatiem and inspectiem the.Beard finds t~at the
a~plieamt requests ~e~missien te set elf aL umdersized let amd
build aeme family dwelli~g. The Bea~ fimdst~at ap~licamt
~as been mLable te acquire addittemal ~reperty adjacent te his
~re~erty amd there are ge buildable parcels let.sale in the
vicimity. The a~licamt ~as beem afflicted by the sud~em Jum~
frem 2~,000 sq. ft. te 40,000 sq. ft. ef area as set fe~th in
t~e mew ZeLi~g 0~dimamee. T~e Beard agrees with the reasemimg
ef the appli~amt..
T~e Beard fiLds t~at strict applicatiem ef the Ordinance will
preduce practical difficulties er ummecessa~yhardship; the hard-
ship treated is umique amd weald get be s~ared by all pre~erties
alike XL the immediate vieimity ef this prepert~ and im the same
use district; and the variance Gees ebserve the spirit ef the
0~ina~e a~ wi~ net e~nge ~ c~acter ef t~e district.
On metiem~yN~. ~illis~ie, seeemded byMr. Bergen, it was
RE~LVEDAlbert ~. ~arbade, Jr. amd wife be GRA~TEDpermissien
te set elf az undersized let amd build aeme family dwelling, as
a~plied fer, em ~re~erty leeated em the west side ef Indiam ~eek
LaLe, Peeemt~, New York.
Vete ef the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigenis,
Deyem.
P~BLIC EEARING: A~q~eal Ne. 1531 - 8:10 P.N. (E.D.S.T.), upem
a~lieatiem ef ~ili~ Gf~tas, Bay View Read, S~thel~, New Ye~k,
fe~ a v~i~ee im aeee~ce wit~ the Zeroing O~imamee, ~tiele III,
~etie~ 305, te ~ee~ a fence eve~ t~ee feet high im the f~emt
ya~ a~ea. Leea~ie~ ef ~e~e~y: ~e~th st~e ef Bay View R~,
~held, New Ye~k, beunde~ mesh by C. & P. Dic~sen; e~t ~
J. Jacques; seuth By Bay View Read; ~d west by Dicke~sem-Vamm~te~.
Fee pai~ $15.00. '
The Chairman epemed the hearing by rea~i~g the applicatien
fera variance, legal metice ef hearing, affidavit attesting te
its pUblicatiem im the efftcial mews~apers,~amd~ netice te the
applicant.
TEE GNA~RNAN: The ap~lteatien is a¢cempanied by a sketch
shewing the ~e~esed femr feet fence which runs alemg Bay View
Read fer abemt 33~ feet amd makes a right a~gle turn te the merth
at the west eld ef the ~re~erty.
~emtheld Tew~ Bea~d of Appeals -5-
l~ay 25, 1972
T~ CNAIRMAN: Is there amyene presemt who wishes te speak
for this applicatiem?
MR. PI~!LIP Jo OFR]LAS, JR.: I believe our app!ieatiom speaks
for itself. Keweve~, ~a~i~ml~ly at this time ef ye~ ~he traffic
gees at ~ excessive ra~e e~ s~ee~ em em~ ~a~. ~ ~il~em ~e
~we, ~ee ~R mime ye~s ef age. We have beem ~metty successful
in kee~i~g t~em ~ ef ~e street but ems ef ~i~ ~s ge~ ~it
las~ yea~.
TEE OEAIRMAN: Does anyeme else wish to speak for this
applieat ion?
(There was me res~emse. )
TNE OHAIRNAN: Is there amyeme presemt who wishes to speak
agaimst this applieatiem?
(There was me res~emse.)
T~E CNAIP~MAN: I am afraid I am in the aafertmmate position
ef speaki~ against the ap~lieatiea. The
3 feet ia height fe~ a fremt yard fenoe. I think yen p~esented
a gee~ ease. This red, est has become a most
appears to ms that a small dog could get through the femce; a large
dog ee~ld ge eve~ it; ehildrem eemld climb ever it er get their
heads eamght ia it] se it weald appear that a remco ef this
character is merely a restrictive imfluemce. It was decided, amd
I thimk p~eperly se, that 3 feet is the proper height for a fremt
yard a~ea. We have demied several remco applieatioas. Oae appli-
eamt wamted a remco te bteck emt moise. It is difficult te make a
ease fe~ mmi~me ha~d~hi~.
~. GLORIAS: A selutlem would be te have a chala limk femce
t~t t~e ehild~em eam~t climb but we den~t want that as there is
methimg attractive ab~t e~im limk femees. The ~e~im~e~ ef
~e~e~ ~ ~e~ femced a~ it is feu~ fee~ ~i~
ehil~n e~ the ~ogs ~ve ge~e ever i~.
TEE ONAIR: I thimk yom have a stockade remco em the easterly
lime~
MR. Oi~RIA~: It is am eld picket fence. A sel~tiem might be te
take ~egmla~¢hiekem wire te p~evemt them f~em gettimg a feet-held.
· thimk that be£ere the ~dimamee ar~yeme erecting a femr feet femce
~i~ met ~ave te eeme te t~m fe~ pe~issiem. ~re a~e several em
Bay View Read t~ sa~ as we want te erect.
TEE CEAIRNAN: This is what we a~e faced with. Im gramtimg we
have te Be. gmided By umiqme amd umusualha~dship. We have already
demied ems fe~ dogs. We suggested that he keep them in the backyard.
Yea cam ge ap te $~6~ im the s~deya~d a~ea which is determined by the
fremt line efyem~ house. Y~f~eu feel that yen mast have a 4' fence,
I weald smggost 2hat you move t ba~k te the fremt line ef you~ house.
Se~theld Tewm Beard ef Appeals
-6- May 25, 1972
I~R. OI~RIAS: The f~emt lime ef the heuse is 35 feet back.
that case we weulA met meed a variance but I de mot think it
~euld leek a~y nicer.
T~E 0~A~M~N: Dees amyene else have a questiem~
(There was me respense.)
T~E CNA~RMAN: We have had quite a bit ef discussien on this
saBJeet. Ye~ have a hardshi~ that is cecum
~ we were ~e g~am~ ~hts ~e~ues~ we w~, in effect, ~e ~e~i~ing
~he ~ima~e.
~R. OImRIAS: Yeu eantt rewrite the 0rdimance but yeu can
grant a va~lamce.
After investiga%ien amd inspestien the Beard finds that the
applicamt requests permissien te erect a fence ever three feet high
in the fren% ya~ area ef ~reperty teeated em the merth sl~e ef
Bay View Read, ~mtheld, New Yerk. The findings ef the Beard are
that t~e Ordinance specifies that a frent yard fence shall Be ne
higher than 3 feet, that this is net a unique hardship, amd that
te g~ant the request weulA have the affect ef.rewriti~g the
0~inanee. T~e Bear~ sugg~ste~ te the ap~lieant.~that he erect the
4 feet high fence, which he requested in the ap~licatien, im the
si~e yar~ area. (The si~e yar~ area is ~etermined by the frent line
ef the heuse).
The Bear~ finds that strict applicatien ef the Ordinance will
net ~reduce ~ractieal ~ifficulties er unnecessary hardship; the
hardship create~ is met unique and weuld Be shared ~y all preperties
alike in the immediate vicinity ef this preperty and in the same
use district; and the variance dees net e~serve the spirit ef the
O~dinanee an~ will cha~ge ~he character ef the district.
On metiemBy N~. Gitlispie, seeended ~y l~r. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED Philip J. 0f~ias, Jr., Bay View Read, Be~theld, New
York, Be DENIED permission te e~eet a fence over three feet high
in the frem% yard area ef ~reperty leca~ed en the merth side ef
Bay 7iew Read, Sea,held, New Yerk.
(F~. 0frias state~ that he had met heard ether members ef
t~e Bea~ speak en the ap~lica~ien and he wemdered if they
had denie~ ~rier te the hearing. The ChaPman peinte~ cut
~ ~e were six, scm he~ings se~duled amd ~t ~.
~frias e~l~ pele ~he Be~. T~ C~ir~n in~o~uced ~.
Be~gem, ~. ~lse, ~. Grigemis a~ ~. Deyem ~e ~. O~ias.)
Vets ef the Bear~: Ayes:- ~iessrs: Giilispie, Bergen, Grigemis,
~ulse, Deyem.
TEE CEAIRMAN: The vete is unanimous. Thank yeu fer ceming
Seutheld Town Beard of Appeals
-7-
25, 1972
PUBLIC EARING: Al~peal Ne. 1537 - 8:20 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), upon
application of George Miller, Oak Drive, Reyden Shores, Se~theld,
New York, for a variance in acc~damee with t~e Zoning ~inance,
~iele III, ~=~iem 3~1 ~e bmil~ an addition en existing building
wi~ ims~fieiem~ si~e y~. Leea$ie~ ef property: Map ef Rey~en
~ereS, Lets 31, 32 ~ 33, ~e~ien D, S~theld, New Y~rk. Fee
~ai~ $15. ~.
The Chairman epened the hearing by reading the application for
a varia~ce, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting te its
publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the a~plieant.
(The Chairman meted that the application had mot been notarized.
N~. George Ahters, Bldr., Inc. a/c George Miller was present.
The Chairma~: (addressing N~. George Ahlers) Do you swea~ this
is the a~plicatioR ef George Miller and that you a~e signir~ it
en behalf ef F~. Miller? N~. George Ahlers: I de. - The affi~mvit
was witnesse~ a~d signed, under oath 5/25/72 by George Ahters and
Rebe~t W, Gillispie, Jr.)
T~E ON~IRNAN: Is there anyone presort who wishes to speak for
this applicat ion?
~. GEORGE AF~,S: The house was built fifteen yea~s ago and
was er~gtnally laid eu~ ~s ~ sa~e~ ~e~. T~e people
w~t~ l~ke t. ~e~e ~ need me~e spree 2e~ ~ per~nent
~y w~l~ l~ke ~e a~ a be~eem te ~he lef~ side ef the house.
~ts Is ~ea~y t~ em~ sl~e em w~ic~ it cemi~ be pat. It weald
~et ~e feasi~ te ge te t~e right si~e because
e~ ~t si~e. T~ ~easems state~ i~ t~ a~plicatiem ~e valid. T~
~e~tmi~g si~ey~ w~ ~ve sufficient ~ea according te zoning
~ws. I$ is a~ el~er neigh~erhee~ an~ ~ ef the homes are built
close te ~e~e~y limes.
THE CNAIEMAN: The a~licatien is accompanied by a Van Tuyl
survey dated JuRe 1, 1971.
~. AELERE: If we added en 1~ feet om the north si~e the
maiRimg si~eysm~ woul~ be a~reximately 6 feet iRstead of 10 feet.
This let is Just ever the square feet minimum requirements ~ut the
ethe~ side yard is eve~ 25 feet.
TEE CNAIRMAN: This is in a regioR of substandard lets. There
are mamy lmf~imgeme~ts of si~e yards. Dees~anyeme else wish to speak
for this application?
TEE GEAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes te speak
against this~applieatiem?
~R. LAWRENCE PRES~Y, Reydon Shores, Seutheld: I live on the
me, th side ef the property, t certainly den~t speak with the intent
ef Beimg a bad neighbor. I think the word in the legal notice summed
i~ up well "insufficieRt" lard. I would net presume te tell N~. Ahlers
-~eutheld Town Beard of Appeals
-8-
Nay 25, 1972
anythlnE about Building ~ut the applicant does have a considerable
ame~t ef prepert~ to the rea~. The side on which they have
ehesem to build is the side with the least amount of land and it
comes within six feet ef my property.
TEE CNAtRMAN: What is the area of the property en the south
side?
MR. AELERE: I think it is ever 25 feet.
TEE CNAIRMAN: The size of the ca~port ~is 8 feet.
MR. ANLER~: We wa~t te add am addition..to the carport and we
want te add a 1redeem. We intend to add on beth sides. The carport
will remain a oa~port but it will Be enlarged.
TEE CNAIRNAN: Is the present ca~port a part of the house?
~R. AELER~: It is all eme reef line.
TEE ON~IRNAN: Se the proposal is to add 8 feet to the carport
leaving a 1;!.feet sideyard en the south side, and te add a bedroom
en the mox~h side which will leave a six feet side yard. Due
the imterier layout of the house it is a matter ef practical
difficulty to put the bedroom en the other side ef the house.
MR. AKEER~: It would entail mere expense te the owners.
Twm CNAIRNAN: Im the e~iginal Ordinance the thought was tk~at
the~inan~e provided fe~ um~ersize~ lots. It was recognized t~t
me, all lets ~ve 25 feet im si~ey~s ~d t~t. im some cases, t~
si~ey~s ~e e~i~e~a~m~e~ t~t. Am i~di~idual was pe~itted
te come in here wi~hem~ requiring a v~i~e a~ ebtaim a buildlmg
~ermi~ f~om ~ Buildt~ Ins~eete~ where t~..sidey~d was reduced
not me~e $~m 5~ of t~ exis~img si~ey~d. ~ i~ went ~lew 5 feet
~hen a v~lamee w~ ~ re~ui~ed. This has ~eem a practice in
the T~ ef S~el~ fe~ se~ ti~. The re,em ~. Ahlers is here
is t~t ~$ is ~ mn~ersize~ 1~ overall. T~re weul~ ~ve been
~e ~iffieul~ in obtaining a ~ull~i~g ~e~t from t~ Building
Inspector p~for ~e pass~e ef ~he ~ew ~i~ce. which Jumped from
~,5~0 sq. ft. to 4~,00~ sq. ft. None of the lets in this ~ea
~m~ ce~ I ~e~laimi~ this situation because I ~i~
~he Bo~ s~u~ ~t this a~lteatiem.
LAWRENCE PRES~Y: I wonder if they could go te the rear?
MR. ANtER~: We considered that But the general layout of the
he~se doesn!t permit it. If you take ~He ~aI1 away (which you need
te go to the rear ef the house) this would leave.such a small room
t~ it we~l~ net ~e ~raetical. Your ho~se is ever quite a bit to
yemr ~ortherly prepe/r~y line.
ER. PRE,BY: We have present plans to ~uild in that direction
but net to the point where we weald need a variance. We would be
13 feet closer tent. Miller's property.
Seutheld Tewn Beard ef Appeals
MR. EOWA~ED T~RY, Building Inspector: If the teem size were
l~e reduced it weald net meet the Eemsing Cede.
TEE CNAIRMAN: Does anyone else wish to speak against this
applicatien?
(There was no response.)
After investigatiem and inspection the Board fimds that the
applicant requests permission te build an addition em an existing
building with insufficient side yard located en 0akDrive, Reyden
~ho~es~ Seutheld, New Ye~k. The Beard finds that this is an
undersized let overall, that this is an eld development and a la~ge
num~er ef hemes a~e close te ~roperty lines; with a 14 feet addition
there will still ~e a S Feet side yard en the northerly side ef the
house; with an 8 feet addition te the carport, there will be a 14 feet
side yard em the semtherly side ef the building. The interior layout
ef the he, se ~es it impractical te locate the additional bedroom
en amy other side ef the house, and if the room size were te be
reduced applicant wemi~ net meet the Reusing Cede.
The Beaed finds that strict application ef the Ordinance will
~reduee ~aetieal difficulties er unnecessaz~y hardship; the
ha~dsht~ created is umique and weald net be sha~ed by all properties
alike in the immediate vieimtty ef this property and in the same
use district; amd the variance does observe the spirit ef the
O~imanee amd will met ehamge the character ef the district.
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. D~yen, it was
R~0LVED George Miller, Seatheld, New Yo~k, be GRANTED permission
te build an addition en existing building with insufficient side yard,
as applied for. Location e~ property: ~ap of Reyden Shores, Lets 31,
32 and 33, ~eetien D, Southeld, New York.
Veto ef the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigemis,
Hulse, Doyen.
PUBLIO NE~.RING: Appeal Ne. 1529 - 8:30 P.M. (E.D.$.T.), upon
application ef Lillian M. Nah~kem, 3511 Taft Effect, Wamtagh, N. Y.,
for a variance in acceedanae with the Zoning 0rdinamee, A~ticle III,
~ectien 301, te divide seven lets with existing dwelling into three
lets. Leeatiem ef property: Track Avenue and Stillwater Avenue,
C~tehegme, New York, Map oF ~. ~. Rand, Lets 46, 47, 48, 73, 74,
75, and 76, Gute~gue, New Y~k. Fee paid $15.00.
The Ohai~man opened the hearing by reading the application for
a variance, legal notice ef heaving, affidavit attesting to its
publication in the official newspapers, amd notice te the applicant.
TNE CEAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to spea$ for
this ap~lieatiem?
Semtheld Tewn Bea~ ef Appeals
-10- May 25, 1972
PAUL E. EAST, ESQ.: I am here te represent Lillian N. N~a~ken.
My ad,ess is 4177 Merrick Read, Massapequa, N.Y. M~s. Euhnken
is E~ecatrix ef the Estate ef Ma~tin Euk~ken whe died February 21,
1972.
TEE ONAIRMAN: The applicatien is aecempanied by Map No. 1280,
Ceunty Clerk's effiee. It appears ~at the preperty is 2~0 fee~
wi~e en Trae~ Avenue, 152 feet em the nertherly end, and 176 feet
a~ the semtherly en~, am~ 201 feet en the easterly beumdary. It is
trapemeidal in s~ape. T~e same ~escriptien weal~ apply te Le~s
Nes. 46, 47 amd ~8 which pre~erty has aeme stery heuse en it. The
ne~therly lime e£ the ~6. 47, 48 let is 162 plus feet, there is 155 ft.
en Sti!lwate~ Avenue, 184 feet em the seutherly line, and 151 feet
adjeining the preperty ef applicant te the west. It is m~ un~er-
standing that M~s. Nmh~kem prepcses te sell Lets 46, 47 an~ 48 te
M~. an~ Mrs. William Smith and the vacant parcels (73-74) and (75-76)
as twe separate ~uil~ing plets te Mr. an~ Mrs..Lawrence Murdeck.
MR. LA~RENCE M~RD~CK: I weutd like tm have these twa segments
treated as separate units. I new live en Lets 71 and 72 which are
net shewa en ~he map that yea have. (Mr. Nmrdeck presented the Beard
with Ma~ shewimg his !~repe~ty). I desire Lets 73 and 7~ which will,
in all prebabtli~y, ~e merged with 71 and 72 ba~ it makes it impessibte
te at,mire 73 and 7~ if I alse have te acquire 75 and 76. I need
appreval te resell 7% and 75. Ail the hemes en Track Avenue
~esently ~ave 1~0 feet fremtage.
TEE CNAIRMAN: Is there anyone else whe wishes to speak for
this a~plicat len?
NR. WrtLIAM ~MITE: I am ~he ewme~ ef t~e prepe~ty en Stillwater
Avenue. I am a lawye~ at 80 Pine Street, N. Y. C. I am p~esently
renting a heme i~ New ~uffelk. I have given m~ landlord netice
that I wl~11, vacate en July 21st. My in%e~tiem is te mere inte
this heme if this variance is g~anted. If it is net g~anted, I am
in a spe~.
TEE CHAIRMAN: Is the~e anyene present whe wishes te speak
agains2 t~is applicatien?
(T~re was ne respense.)
A~te~ investigatien a~ imspectien the Beard fin~s that
applicant re,mesas pe~aissien te divide seve~ lets with existing
dwelling inte t~ee lets en preperty lecated at Track Avenme and
Etillwater Avemme, 0m$chegue, New Yerk. The fiudings ef the Beard
a~e that a~plicamts ~lets a~e in a tract develepment that gees back
te 1~27 amd t~at the new plets that wilt be created with the granting
ef this variamee will ~eadily meet the area requirements which
presently exist.
Seuthel~ Tewn Eeard ef Appeals -11- May 25, 1972
The Beard finds that strict appli~atien ef the 0rd~nan~e
will pre~uee l~raetfcal ~tfficul~tes er unmeeess~y h~shtp; ~he
~ar~s~i~ create~ is unique an~ we~i~ net ~e s~e~ by all p~e~er~ies
alike In the i~iate vicimity ef t~is preperty an~ in t~e same
ass ~ist~iet; ~d t~e variance ~ees ebserve the spirit ef
~inamce an~ will met c~ange the character ef t~e ~istrict.
On motien by M~. Bergen, seconded by ~. Grigenis, it was
R~LVED Ltilian M, Nmh~ken, 3511 Taft ~treet, Wantagh,
NewYerk, ~e GRANTED Permissien, as applied fer, te divide seven
lets with existing ~welling inte t~reelets at Track Arenas and
~tillwate~ Ave~me, Omtehegme, New Yerk, Map ef M. $. Nand, Lets ~$,
~7, ~, 73, 7~, 75, and 7~, Cutehegue, ~ew Yeti.
Vets ef the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: GillisPie, Bergen, Grigenis,
Nmlse, Deyen.
PUBLIC ~EARING: Appeal Ne. 1535 - 8:45 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), upen
a~plicatien ef Margaret Katmenberg, Tewm Na~be~ Lane, ~emtheld,
New Yerk, fer a variance im as~erd~uce with the Zening 0r~inance,
Article III, ~ectien 301, fer permissiem te set elf undersized let
with existimg dwelling. Lecatten ef preper~y: seuth side ef Indian
Neck Lane, Pecemic, New Yerk, ~eunde~ merrily Indian Neck Lane;
east by lamd new er fermerly ef J. Dauth; seuth ~y Little Pecenic
Bay; and west ~y lan~ new er fermerly ef M. L. Wiles Estate. Fee
~aid $15. oo.
The Chairman epened the hearing by reading the applicatien
fer a variance, legal netice ef hearing, affidavit attesting te
its publicatien in t~e effiefat newspapers, and netice te the
a~licamt.
TNE CNAIRMAN: Is there anyene present whe wishes te speak
fer this a~plicatien?
MARGARET $. EATZENBERG: I am Margaret Katmenberg.
TNE CNAXRNAN: In t~e letter received frem Gettlfeb J. Nickles
ef the Dteki~sem Real Estate Agency it was stated ~Mrs, Katzenberg
~,s ne desire te sell elf merethan the subject parcel at this time.
She wishes te ~e~ain the remainder ef the preperty fer her daughter
whe lives im the ~emedele~ secend hemse." The Netice ef Disappreval
is ~ased em the let having insafficient area. The prepesal is te
cmt t~e ~cel emt ef 4.136 acres (23,416 sq. ft.) rese~ving the
20 feet st~t~ w~ic~ will ~e ~etaime~ ~y yeur ~amghter. There is
alse seme~img sai~ ~e a~eut ~ivi~ing t~e ~reperty inte t~ee
(ems ~l~s acres) lets.
MRS. EATEE~BERG: We may de t~at in the future.
TNE CNAIRNAN: Yeu will have te ge te the Planning Beard "fer that.
~uthol~ Town Bea~ ef ~ppeals -12-
1972
TNE CNAIRNAN: There a~e two homses eat nea~ the Bay and I
Believe this is am equitable way te put the dividing line ~etween
t~e two houses. T~e only thimg we are required to de is to assm~e
t~at t~e applicant maintains the right-of-way; and that the parcel
which eventually weald ge with the remodeled second house shall
offset any deficiency. You ~ave eneagh property here to create
fear lets.
~RS. EATEENBERG: ~ wontd not wish to ever have more than
fem~ houses em ~ p~e~e~ty. ~em we beugh~ the property it ~id
mos ecemr te ms ~e leek at ~he ~ivisiem ef the lam~. We ~ve
~wo damghte~s and Beth ~ve spen~ the maJo~ portieu ef their
lives here. ~e ~amghter, Because ef her ~sBan~'s empl~nt,
can net live here se eme ef e~r temamts weml~ like te buy it.
T~g CNAIRMAN: Is t~ere anyehe present who .wishes te speak
against this applicatlen?
(T~ere was ne response.)
After investigation and inspectiem the Beard finds that the
applicant reqaests permissiem te set elf undersized let with
existimg dwellimg em ~reperty located en the south side ef
Indian Neck Lane, Pecenic, New York. The findings cf the Beard
a~e th~_t this is am eqmita~le division ef property and the Beard
agrees with the rease~ing ef t~e applieamt.
T~e Beard finds that strict application ef the Ordinance
will pre~uce ~ractical ~ifficulties er unnecessary hardship; the
hardship created is mnlque a~ would not Be s~are~ By all
properties alike im the immediate vicinity ef this property and
in t~e same use district; a~d the variance does observe the
spirit ef the Ordimanee and will net change the character ef the
district.
~n metien by N~. Gillispte, seconded by Nr. Bergen, it was
RE~OLVEDMargare% ~. KatzenBerg, Town Harbor Lane, ~cutheld,
New ~erk, Be *RANTED permissien te set elf andersimed let with
existimg dwelling en property located en the south si~e ef Indian
Neck Lane, Peeenie, New York, as applied fer.,subJect te the
following ce~ftiems:
T~at the applicant maintain the right~ef-way that presently
exists fren applicant's own property.
T~at the let area ef the remedelefl second house shall be
net less tha~ 56,585 sq. ft.
Vote ef the Beard:
Nmlse, Deyem.
Ayes:- Messrs: Giltispie, Bergen, Grigenis,
~outheld Town Board sol Appeals
May 25, 1972
PUBLIC ~ARING: Appeal No. 1536 - 9:00 P.M. (E.D.~.T.), upon
application of ~alvatore Loria, First and King Street, New Suffolk,
New York, for a variamce in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Article !II, ~ectten 300 and Article VII, ~ection 700 B-3, for
ps,mission te use a private garage as commercial storage. Location
of property: west side of First Street, Ne~.~uffelk, New York,
bemnde~ ne~thbyBenick; east by First Street; south by C. Avent;
amd west by Mar~ add Start Victoria. Fee paid $15.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for
a variance, legal notice ef hearing, affidavit attesting to its
publication in the official newspapers, and notice te the applicant%
The Chairman also read letter received from "A Concerned
Resident~ regarding property em the west side~ofFirst Street owned
by Salvate~e Leria, formerly owned by Vincemt~tin; and p~epe~ty
en t~e east st~e ef First ~treet kmc~ as Capt. TemPs Fishi~
~tatiem - ~e ~asic subject ef t~e ~tter is "New Suffe~ is s~ll
an~ this pre~lem~y seem ime~msequentiai ~mt te ~esidents ef t~is
~et t~e ~h ef ~usi~ess i~te a ~eside~tial a~ea is met
acceptable. (~tter im fils; ~ate~ May Sth, 1972, ad~resse~ te
~. Al~e~t N~tecchia, ~e~vise~; cc: ~. Je~Wic~m,
~e~thel~ Te~ Planning Be~d).
The Chairman also read letter dated May~10,1972, addressed
te M~. Robert W. Gi!lispie, Jr., Chairman, Board cf Appeals ~outheld
Town- received from N~. Charles W. Norgan, President of the New
~uffolk Civic Association (letter in file); and the Chairman!s
reply to Nr. Morgan (letter in file).
TNE CNA~NAN: These letters describe the situation as it
exists. The only thing under application is the use ef residential
propert~y for commercial refrigeration, ts there anyone present who
wishes to speak for ~his application?
I~. ~AL~AT~RE I~RIA: t woul~ like to say. that I am only trying
to make a refrigeration unit te help me take ca~e of my business
because Ih ave no place te store s~uid. I thought if I could put
it iD my garage I could take it across the street when I need it.
T~ECNAI~MAN: It womld be comventent. Who owns the property
across the street?
I~R. LORIA: Joan Weeds. She ~ented it to me stating it was a
commercial property. This is the only reason why I took it. It was
a fishing sta$ion before and she was under the impression that it was
still a commercial use.
TEE CNAIRMAN: The non-conforming use was discontinued for more
than two years. That means y~ have te reapply te this Boa~ to
obtain nen-cenfex~mi~g use. This is not iD your application. The
commercial pa~ki~g and storage of boats is illegal unless you get
a~ action from this Boa~. I think it would be better to have M~s.
Weeds apply as she is the ew~e~ of the property. It woul~ seem to me
Seuthold Town Beard ef Appeals -14- May 25, 1972
th_~_t it wemld be in the interest ef New Suff~elkte permit that use
te be reactivated as a pa~kil~g facility. This Beard could impose
a condition ef two yea~s amd in that way if the use becomes undesir-
able permissiem weald net be renewed. It does look as though you ave
operating em a very few square feet.
MR. LOR~A: It did leek like a shambles but. I have cleaned it
T~ECNAIRMAN= Yom a~e building refrigeration in year own
garage and you want pe~missiem te de that; you ave also using
property across the street for parking cars amd ave storing
beats em the ~each.
MR. LORIA: I hmve beem storing abo~ ten or fifteem cars
there which weul~ otherwise ~e en the street.
MR. ROBERT BERGEN: Is this freezer for yc~ own use or a~e
you going to peddle
MR. LORIA: ~t~s for m~ ewn use. ~f I can get e~ough squi~
cemld keep it for the season. I have ne facilities at the Bait shop.
I weul~ like te keep the squi~ in geed shape. I will have eme
freezer amd eno refrigerator. Ne eno will come in
that would ~e bought would be at Captain Martyrs Fishing Station.
MR. FRED EUt/~, JR.: What is tl~e size ef y~ur garage?
MR. LORIA: I demtt kmew the exact dimensions but it is about
feet wide and has two deers but one is smaller than the ether.
Does anyone else wish te ~peak for this applica-
THE~NA~: Is there anyone present who wishes te speak against
this a~plieatien? (I might exclaim that I am personally ef the opinion
that this is am illegal use ef residential property se I will have te
vote agaimst ~his a~plicatien).
MRS. CARL AVENT: We are directly %e the south. I am agaimst
~usiness use going into a residential a~ea.
JAMES DILL, Treasurer ef New Suffolk Civic Ass*n.: We a~e
te any ~usi~ess going into a residential area.
MRS. JONNBONNAR, New Suffelk: I am against.
T~E CNAIRMAN: As long as New~uffelk residents are here I would
like te get the~ feelings en reactivating. I believe he will have
~e come in with an application te use that property. It seems te me
that you need te get cars elf the street. This is one ef the ways
you san get them elf.
Southold Tewn Boar~ of Appeals -i5- Eay 25, 1972
MRS. BONNAR.
co~rciai use.
We dentt object to that but we do object to
TNE CNAIRMA~N: If N~. Loria or F~s. Woods comes in with an
appltsation to pa~k ca~s and store boats on the beach would that
~e objectionable to residents of New Suffolk?
MRS. DILL: If ye~ g~ ~t~d this wemld it be Business zoning2
TNE ONAIRNAN: It weald be restricted tocars and boats.
This weul~ net be granting a Business use.
DILL: The Asseeiatie~ would n~ be against.
2. GARL AVERT: W~ere does he put outboard motors? There are
some ether buildings o~ the property.
MR. LGRIA: T~ere is a little shack on the side. I stere
motors there. I was told I c~uld do that.
TEE CNAIRNAN: I don't believe there a~e objections to storing
eatbeard mote~s in a building that is already there.
MR. LORIA: All I am interested in is pa~king ears and getting
m~boa~s in and out.
T~ CEA~N: M~a. Woe~$ would be g~anted permission to park
ca~s, store ~oats am~ outboard mo~e~s fe~ a ~eri~d ef two ye~s.
A~ ~he e~ e~ ~he two ye~s we ceml~ re-examine.
MRS. ABELE: ts he im business for himself or has he got a
partner?
TEE CNA~RNAN: I am not sure that question is relevant.
MR. ~I~: I have me partner. (Mm. Loria explained about a
temporary a~gement he had with his brother regarding storage
ef worms).
TEE CNAI~NAN: Are there a~y othe~ questions?
OIARA ONODY: We don~t wamt commercial. Would that have to be
rezone~ te be commercial?
TEE CHAIRNAN: This is not a popularity contest but I am afraid
we can't give him a busimess use im a~~l~la~ea. I will have to
veto against this.
After i~vestigatlo~ amd inspection the Boa~d fim~s that applicsmt
requests permissiom to mae a private garage as commercial storage
the west si~e of ~i~st ~treet, New ~uffelk, New York. The fimdimgs
ef the Be~ are t~at app!icamt prOPoses te use a residential momed
garage on ~is ew~ residential property f~ Bmsiness purposes.
Town Board ef Apl~eals -16-
May 25, 1972
The Board figs that strict application of the Ordinance
will not produce practical difficulties er unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created is not unique and would be shared bY all
properties alike Im the immediate vicinity of this property and
lm the same use district; a~d the v~ia~ce ~ees net observe the
spirit ef the ~imamee am~ will chamge the character ef the
~ist~ict.
Om motte~by Mr. Gillis~ie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RE~OLVED Ealvatere Leria, First and King Street, New Suffolk,
New York, be DENIED permission te use a private garage as
commercial ste~age located em the west side of First Street, New
~uffelk, New York.
Vote ef the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Rulse, Doyen.
PUBLIC ~EARING: Appeal No. 1537 - 9:20 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), u~on
application of Thomas a/~d Vi~gi~is Jernick, Shelter Island, New
York, for a ~pecial Exception in accordance with the.ZOning
O~dinanoe, Article VIII, ~eotien 800 B-3, to use premises and
operate a ~emmerelal ste~age l~ildtng. Location of property:
south side ef Co,win ~treet, Greenport, New York, bounded north
by Cerwin S~reet; east by Seventh Street; south by Long Island
Railroad; and west by Eighth ~treet; new or formerly lets numbered
~5, ~6, 47, ~8 and ~9 en Nap ef ~. B. Corwtn, Greenpert, New York.
Fee paid $15.00.
The Gh~i~man opened the hearing by reading~the application
for a ~pesial Exception, legal notice ef hearing, affidavit
attesting te its ~m~licatiom in the official newspapers, and
notice te the a~lieant.
T~E CNAIRMAN: The application is accompanied by a survey
indicating that the ~reperty is a~preximately 100 feet on the
westerly~eu~dary, is P~9 feet in length on the Long Island Rai!vead
and the~e is a warehouse em the property extending about two,thirds
ef the length ef the property parallel to the Long Island Railroad.
TNE ONAIRMAN: Is the~e anyone present .who wishes to speak
for this a~lieatien?
~TANV~Y~. CORWIN, EEQ.: I am the after-ney for the people who
a~e gei~g~te ~e~ome purchasers ef the property. There is presently
a eent~aot between Thomas and Virginia Jernick and Walte~ and garry
Bm~den. The property is on a rai!~ead siding and it is an ideal
lecatio~ for the ~ of ~ustness that they wish to conduct and it
is the type of busimess that has been conducted there for fifty years
whe~ my father put the ~milding ~p. It has always been used for
ste~age, since right after World War I.
Sea%hold Town Bea.~d of Appeals
-l?- May 2~, 1972
THE CHAIRNAN: De they propose te change the building?
MR. CORWIN: They may change the doorways but there will be
MR. NOMARD TERRY, Building Inspector: Because of the fact that
they o~cupy a whole Block, I think that for their protection in case
ef lime the setback lines should Be recognized so that if they ever
want te rebuild they would have something ts start with. Historically,
that whole Block has had men-conforming use with the exception of the
Ntlls Building. We should ~ecegnlze the existing setback lines in
case they should want te rebuild.
T~E CHAIRMAN: The Board recognizes the applfcantts right to
vary the front yard setback tea reasonable distance Based en the
size ef the let.
I~R. CORWIN: The reason the let is lo~ger.en eno side th~n
the ether is that it ~re-dated the railroad.
THE GHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
agaimst this application?
(There was no response,)
THE CNAIRNAN: Are there any questions?
MR. EOWARD TERRy, Building Inspector: Becauso of its proximity
te the Village we have to have approval of the County Planning
C.ommissien.
After imvezttgatien and inspection the'Beard finds that
applicant a Exoeptiom ~o use premises and operate
a em the south side ef Corwtn ~t~eet,
Greenport, New Yerk~ The property is near the Incarperated Village
ef Green~ert Beur~ed en the north by Cerwin Street, east by Seventh
~treet, semt~By the Long Islamd Railmead, a~d west By Eighth Street.
e ~ecial exceptiem is re~ueste~ Because of the recent amendment
the Zoning Oedina~ee which makes the wholesale storage and
warehousing use te which the structure em the premises is and has
Been ~ut for more than fifty years a non-com~orming use. The
property is om a railroad siding an~ is an ideal Iecatien for this
type of use; it has Been used for storage since.right after World
Wa~ I. The Boa~d agrees with the reasoning of the aFplicant.
The Beaed finds that the public cemvenience and welfare and
justice will Be served and the legally established or permitted use
ef neighBe, heed p~oper~y and adjoining use districts will net be
~ermanentty er substantially in~ured and the spirit of the @rdfnance
will Be observed.
Semthold Town Bear~ o£ Appealm -18- May 25, 1972
0n metien l~y M~. Nmlse, seconded by M~. Bergem, it was
RE~LVED T~emas a~ Virginia Jernick, S~elter Island, New
York, be ~NTEDpermfssion te use premises a~ operate a
commercial storage building. Location ef property: south s~de
ef Oe~wim ~treet, Green~ert, New York.
Vote ef the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigenis,
Nmlse, Doyen.
PUBLIC ~EA~EING: Appeal Ne. 1538 - 9:30 P.M. (E.D B.T.), upon
a~licatio~ of Robert Vau~er~e~k, ~75 West Creek Ave~e, Cutc~egue,
New York, for a variance im accordance with the Zoning Ordima~ee,
Article III, ~ection 301, for permissiom to buil~ am a~itien
en existing ~wellingwith imsufficient si~e y~, Location ef
~e~erty: east si~e efWes$ Creek Avenue, Cut~hegme, New Ye~k,
~m~ neath By William~y; east byE. Mort; south by G. B~ning;
a~ west ~y West C~ek Aven~e. Fee paid $15.00.
The Chairman opened the Bearing by reading the application
for a variamce, legal notice ef hearing, affidavit attesting
its publication in the official newspapers, an~ notice te the
a~plieant.
T~ECNAIRMAN: The application is accompanied by a sketch
shewimg that the existing house consists of an area 16~ x 16~
cemnecte~ te an a~ea 16~ x 20~. It is ~ropesed te ad~ a room
(~' x 16~) te the s~th which will bring the side y~d de~ tc
6~. It is also p~epesed te ad~ a ~eem (7' x 13') tm the e~ fe~med
By the two existing ~ms.
T~I~ CNAIRNAN: Is there anyeme present who wishes to speak for
t~is application?
MR. R~BERT VANDERBECK: I Just want to point cut that it was
not me~tie~e~ i~ ~ applica~iem tha~ ~ ~augh~e~ ~s all of
this p~epe~ ~e t~ se~th a~ also te the west. T~ sketch e~ly
s~ews ~ ef t~e ~let. I own 2~0' in ~ept~. F~rly this was
eme ~ig ~let. I aequ~e~ t~is im 1957. ~my ef the lets in this
T~E CNAIRNAN: Year te~a! a~ea is 10,000 s~, ft. Eew fa~ from
your house is your damghte~,s house?
~R. VANDERBECK: Nor hemse is a way down the rea~.
THE CEAIRNAN:' Is there anyone present who wishes te speak
against t~is.applieation?
(There was no response.)
Semthel~ Tew~ Board ef Appeals -1~-
May 25, 1972
After imvestigatien amd fmspectten the Beard finds that
a~licant ~e~uests permission te build an addition em existing
West Greek Avenue, Catohegae, New York. The findings of the
Beard a~e that applicant ~as am umdersi~ed lot u~er the present
O~i~mce; t~t the lets im't~ ~ea tend te ~e undersized beth
the merth a~ t~ semth ef this p~e~erty ~d have staggere~
set~acks f~em West Creek Avemue. The Be~ agrees with the
reasoning of t~ applicant.
The Boa~d finds that strict application ef the 01~iinanoe
will pre,ucc practical difficulties er umneoessa~yhardship; the
~z~dshi~ created is unique and weul~ not be sha~ed by all properties
alike im the immediate vicinity ef this property.and in the same
use district; and the va~iamce does observe the spirit ef the
~inanoe amd will net change t~e character ~ef the district.
On motion by N~. Grigenis, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RE~OLVED Robert Vamderbeek, 2475 West Creek Avenue, Cutchogue,
New York, be GRANTED permissien, as applied for, to build an
addition en existing dwelling with insufficient sideyard located
em the east side of West Creek Avenue, Cutchegue, New York.
Vote ef the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Nalse, Deyem.
PUBLIC NEARING: Appeal No. 1539 - 9:~5 P.M. (E.D.$.T.), upon
application ef James Dean, New Suffolk Avenue, Cutchogue, New York,
for a variazce in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III,
~ectien 300 C-3, for permission te build an accessol~y building in
freer yard area. Lecatiem ef property: Let number 9, Map ef
Dewnsview, south side ef Dean Drive, Cutchegue, New Ye~. Fee paid
$1 .0o.
The Chairman opened the hea~ing byreading the application
for a variance, legal notice ef hearing, affidavit attesting to
its publication in the official newspapers, amd notice te the
applicant.
TEE C~IRMAN: Is there anyone present ~he w&shes to speak
for this application?
MR. JAME~ DEAN: I am the owner. Ny father-in-law is here
tonight. ~e is a builder and ~e drew ~p the sketch.
TEE CNAtRMAN: The area has other garages in the front yard
area.
I~R. DEAN: There are garages in the front yards all along the
lime.
Southol4 Tow~ Boa~d of Appeals -20-
May D, 1972
TNE GNAtRMAN: H~w fa~ off the lot line would ~eu have the
garage?
(M~. Dean and his father-in-law concurred .that the garage
would Be 20 feet from the ma~ker, not from the curb.)
T~E CNAIRMAN: I would like te see it put back 25 feet.
After investigation an~ inspection the Board finds that
alM~lioant requests permission te build an accessory building in
front yard a~ea e~ the seu~h si~e ef Deam D~ive, Cu~ehegue, New
Yo~k. T~e fin~t~gs~ef the Be~d are t~t ~my of the p~eper~ies
in the nei~be~hee~ ~ve g~ages in the front y~ ~ea.
The Beard finds that strict application of the Ordinance will
produce practical difficulties or unnecessar~ hardship; the ha~d-
ship created is unique and would not be share~ by all p~operties
alike in the immediate vicinity ef this property and in the same
use district; and the variance does observe the spirit of the
Ordinance and will no~ change the character of the district.
On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded By Mr. Grigenis, it was
RE~OLVED Jam~s Dean, New ~uffolk Avenue, Cutchegue, New York,
be GRANTED permission to Build an accessory building in the front
yar~ a~ea, subject ~e the following conditions:
That the accessory Building be located at least 6 feet from
any side yard and 25 feet from Dean Drive, Cutchogue, New York.
Vote of the Boa~d: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigenis,
Ealse, Doyen.
PUBLI0 .N~ARIN~: Appeal Ne..15~0 - 9:55 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), upon
application of Oysterpends Niste~cal Society, Imc., Village Lane,
0~ient, New York, for a Special Ex~eption in accordance with the
Zoning O~dimance, Article III and XII, Sections 300 B-3 and
120~ a, ~, and ¢, for permission to relocate a non-conforming
use within the same p~o~erty and in a different Building. Location
of p~operty: east si~e of Village Lane, Orient, New Yo~k, bounded
north ~y Mabel Richards; east by Andrade; south by Ledy; an~ west
by Village Lane. F
The Chairman opened the hea~ing by reading the application for
a special exception, legal notice of hea~ing, affidavit attesting
to its pubtica~ion in the official newspapers, an~ notice te the
a~plican~.
TNE CNAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
for this application?
(There was no response.)
Semthel~ Tewm Bear~ of Appeals -21-
May 25, 1972
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this application?
(T~ere was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: I can speak for t~e application having inspected
the Sam Vail house. I advised the applicants that they would not
have to come here tonight. It is a simple moving ef non-conforming
use on one pamt ef the property to another psmt of the property.
The room weutd omly be used for a few houms a week for a non-profit
orgamization.
After investigation and inspection the Bosmd finds that
applicant requests permission te relocate a non-conforming use
within the same property and in a different building on prope~y
Iosated en the east side of Village Lame, Orient, New York. The
Board agrees with t~e reasoning of the applicant as the use is
for a non-profit organization.
The Board finds that the ~ublic conveniences, and welfare and
Jmstice will be served and the legally esta'mlished er permitted
use of neig~borho~d property and adjoining use districts will net be
pemmanemtly or substantially injured an~ the spirit ef the 0~dinance
will be e~served.
On motion by Mr. Gillis~ie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED Oyster~onds Historical Society, Inc., Village Lane,
Orient, New ~o~k, be gramted ps,mission to relocate a non-conforming
use withim the same property am~ in a different building en
~roperty located en the east side of Village Lane, Orient, New
Vote of t~e Boamd: Ayes:- Nessrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Hulse, Doyem.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No.. 1541 - 10:10 P.E. (E.D.~.T.), u~em
applicatiem ef MamJorie Baker a/c Universalist Church Ladies League,
Seuthold, New Yo~k, for a special permit inac~o~dance with
Zoning Ordinance A~ticle III, ~c~ion B, sub~. ~, to conduct a
y~ sale fe~ the ~enefi~ ef ~ C~reh ~ociety. Location of
property: pre~ses ef ~je~ie Baker, Y~ngs Avenme an~ Main ~treet,
~thel~, New Ye~k. ~te ef sale te be Ju~ 5, 1972.
The Ohairmam read the application for a Special permit, legal
notice of hesmimg, affidavit attesting to its publication in the
offi~ial newspapers, and notice to the applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
for this application?
Town Bos.vd of Appeals -22-
May 25, 1972
NARJORIE ti. BAXteR: The application covers it.
TEE ONAIRMAN: The Ordinance is quite specific in attempting
to define that this is for the purpose of selling personal
possessions ef the owner er tenant and that it could be done once
a year. Also it eom Be done for charitable purposes. You say
yom have also displayed articles of your own.
ERS. BAKER: I do not want to sail under false colors. I
would Be willing to pay the $15.00. There were things left in
my house when the tenant moved out, which I would like to sell.
THE CEAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this application for a special exception?
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
a~plioan~ requests permission to conduct a yard sale for the
benefit of the Church ~eciety (Universalist Church Ladies League).
The Board fimds~that M~s. Baker will conduct the sale on her own
premises and also wishes to display some personal possessions for
sale.
The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and
justice will Be served and the legally established or permitted
use of neighborhood property and adjoining mse districts will not
be permanently or substantially ihJured and the spirit of the
0rdin~ce will be observed.
On metion byMr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RE~0LVED Ma~jorie Baker a/o Universalist Church Ladies League,
~euthe!d, New lTerk Be GRANTED permission to conduct a yard sale
for the Benefit of ~he C~rch ~eolety om premises ef MarJorie
Baker, Youngs Ave~e and Main Street, Southold, New York, subject
to the following conditions:
t. Pe~missiom is for a eno day yard sale te be held on JulyS,
1972 with an alternate rain date, July 6, 1972.
Permission is for the sale of household and personal
property ef owner or tenant and may n~ include property
ef neighbors unless it is for cha~itable purposes.
Vote of t~e Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Eulse, Doyen.
PUBLIC NEARING: Appeal'No. 15~2 - 10:20 P.M. (E.D,S'T.), upon
application ef Aga~haWilkimson, 0aklawn Avenue, Seuthold, New York
fo~ a spe¢talexoeptien in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance Article
~II, ~e~tio~ B, suBd. ~, to conduct a yard sale onpremise, s east side
~emthold Town Board ef Appeals -23-
May 25, 1972
of Oaklawn Aven~e, ~e~thold, New York, Bounded north by Ulrich;
east By C. Grigonis; south By C. Noose; and west By Oaklawn Avenue.
Date ef sale to be July 15, 1972; rain date July 16, 1972. Fee
paid $15.0o.
T~e O~airman opened t~e hea~ing By reading the application for
a special exception, legal notice of hea~ing, affidavit attesting
te its publl&atien in the official newspapers, and notice to the
applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
for this application?
AGATNAWILKIN~ON: A sister ef mine sold a house in S~thampton
and gave me a lot ef things, and my brother Just died and left some
things te me. They a~e too good to threw away.
T~E CHAIRMAN: This is the first time we have attempted to
control yard sales. Where it relieves a hardship it is a desirable
thing ~ut where it competes wi~h regular ~usiness it is not and
causes traffic prel~lems.
THE CNAIRNAN: Is there anyone presen~ who wishes to speak
against this application?
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Beard finds that
applicant requests ~e~missien to conduct a yard sale on premises
east side ef Oaklawn Avenue, Seuthold, New York.~ The Board agrees
with the reasoning ef the applicant.
The Beard flmds that the pmBlic convenience and welfare and
Justice will Be served and t~e legally established or permitted
use of neighborhood ~eperty an~ adjoining use districts will net
Be permane~ly e~ suBstamtially injured and the spirit of the
O~dinamee will be observed.
On motien By Mm. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED Agatha Wilkinson, 0aklawnAvenue, Seuthold, New York,
~e GRANTED pe~missiom te conduct a yard sale on premises east s~de
of ~aklawn Avenue, Southold, New York, subject te the following
conditions:
1. Permission is for a one day yard sale te ~e held on July
15, 1972; ~aim date July 16, 1972.
Permission is for the sale ef household and ~ersenal
~rope~ty of owner or tenant and may net include property
ef neighbors mnless it is for a charitable purpose.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Nmlse, Doyen.
Semtheld Town Boa~d ef Appeals
-24- May 2%, 1972
PUBLIC NEARING: Appeal No. 15~3 - 10:30 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), upon
application o£A~t~wSpurway, Sound View Avenue, Seatheld, New
York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Article III, Sectiem 301, for permission ~o divide property and
se~ elf let with existing dwelling. Locationoof property: south
side of Sound View Avenue, Seutheld, New York, bounded north by
Sound View Avenue; east by Bailey, Jacobi, Latham and ethers;
south by Tewa ef Southeld and others; and west by Terp. Fee paid
$!5.oo.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for
a variance, legal notice ef hearimg, affidavit attesting to its
~ublicatien im the official mewspape~s, and metice to the applicant.
TNE CNAIRMAN: The application is accompanied by a sketch which
imdicates that the property lies along Sound View Avenue for a
distance of 355 £ee~ including a right-of-way. The proposal is te
sell the lot e~ which there is an existimg dwelling. This lot is
well over 25,0~0 sq. ft. The remaiming lots will each be ever
25,~00 sq. ft., pa~ticula~ly if you i~clude the right-of-way.
TKg CNAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for
this applieatiem?
WALTER GEORGE ~APP, EBQ.: (Me. Kapp in~roduced 1/v. and
A~t~r~purway te t~Bea~d). ~en t~y acquired ~his ~repe~y
they ceul~ have sel~ t~ lots elf withou~ approval. (~. Kapp and
~ Be~ ~is~usse~ ~ ~ shewing the size of lots in the
s~rem~ing a~ea.) This Map shows that ~ny ef the le~s in the
area a~e s~lle~ se ~ the variance will ne~ cha~e the character
~the
TEE ONAIRMAN: Is there anyome present who wishes to speak
agaimst this applicatiem?
(There was ne res~emse.)
After i~vestigatien amd inspection the Board finds that the
a~plican~ reqmests lmermission to divide property.and set off lot
with existimg /~elllng locate~ on the south ~side ef ~eund View
Avemue, ~eutheld, New Ye~k. The Board agrees with the reasoning
of the a~plieant that it is an equitable division of property,
that the a~licant is proposing a division which is as fair as
cam be acoem~lished fe~ the purposes of the Town. The lot on
which the~e is a house is approximately in the middle of the
property that the applicant owns.
The Boa~d finds that striot applicatiem of ~he Ordinance ~r~ll
~rodmco practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hard-
ship created is a~ique am~ weald n~t be sha~ed by all properties
alike in ~he immediate vicinity of this property and in the same
use district; and the variance does observe the spirit of the
O~dinanee and will not ohange the character o£ the district.
Seuthold Town Besmd ef Appeals
May 25, 1972
On metiemby Mm. Bergem, seconded by Er. Grigonis, it was
RE~OLVED A~thur 8purway, Soun~ View Avenue, Southold, New York,
be GRANTED permission to divide property and set off let with
existing dwelling em the seath side of Sound View Avenue, ~omthold,
New York, as applied for.
Veto ef the Boa~d: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Hulse, Doyen.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal Ne. 15~ - 10:~5 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), upon
application ef Barbara Hauras, Maim Road, Cutchogue, New York, for
a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance A~ttcle
III, ~eetion B, subd. 14, to conduct a yamd sale en premises north
side of Maim Road, Cutchogue, New York, bounded no~h by ¢oyne;
east by Rowland; south by Maim Read; amd west by Ceyne. Date ef
sale te ~e May 27, 1972; rain date May 29, 1972. Fee paid $15.00.
The ChaL~man opened the hearing by reading the application for
special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting
is publication i~ the official newspapers, and notice to the
a~plicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
for this application?
(There was ne response.)
MR. HOWARD TERRY, Building inspector: They will be notified
tomo~=~ if it's appreve~. This property is in B zeno. One ef the
· enditions I should thimk would be that someone supervise parking.
MR. C~_RLES GRIGONIS, JR.: Would it be possible to park on
only the north side of Main Road?
THE CHAIRMAN: We can't impose a ruling that can't be enforced
by other branches of government.
THE CHAIRMAN: Does anyome wish to speak.against this application?
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant
requests ~e~missien to conduct a yard sale om p~emises north side
of Maim Road, Cut~hogue, New York. The Bear~ agrees with the
reasoning of the applicant.
The Boa~d finds that the public convenience and welfare and
Justice will be sex-~ed and the legally established or pe~mitted
~se of neighborhood pr?perry and adjoining use districts will not
o permanen=£y or su~s=antially injured and the spirit of the
~dinance will be observed.
Seuthold Te~rn Board of Appeals
On motion by M~. Grigonis, seconded by~ Bergen, it was
RESOLVED Ba~Bava Hav~r~s, Nain Read, Cutchegme, New York,
Be GF~NTEDpermissien te conduct a y~d sale on premises north
si~e ef Naim Rea~, Gm~eheg~e, New Ye~k, subject ~e the fell~ing
cemditte~s:
Date of sale to be May 27, 1972; raim date May 29, 1972.
Permission is for the sale ef household and personal
property of owner or temant and may not .include property
of neig~hbors unless it is for a charitable purpose.
Vote of the Boa~d:
Nmlse. Doyen.
Applicant must provide someone te SUpervise parking at
the yard sale.
Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
On motie~byM~. Bergen, seconded by l/v.~Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that the next regular meeting ·f the ~tholdTown
Beard ef Appeals will be held at 7:30 .P.M., Thursday, June 15,
1972, at the Town Of£i~e, Main Road, Semibold, New York.
Veto of the Boa~d: Ayes:- Messrs: GiliiSpie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Eulse, Doyen.
On motion by ~. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED that the minutes of the SouthcId Town Board of Appeals
dated May 4~1972, ~e approved as submitted, subject to minor
Yore of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grtgenis,
~lse, Doyen.
For the Record: The Board approved seven ~sign aFplicatlens,
and ~isa~prOved one sign appllcatlen.
My. an~ Mrs. George F. VandeWeude of Seaweed Drive, Southeld,
New York disoussed the prospect e£ their having a yard sale en
June 3, 1972 as ~m. VandeWoude is scheduled te be transferred to
the Washington a~ea by the llth of June. The Chairman asked when
they had te be eat o~ the house and I~r. VandeWeade replied that he
had te start working on June ~th. The Chairman stated that ordinarily
this appeal would not be heard until June 15th. ~. VandeWoude said
that the date they had to close en the sale of their house is June 15th.
~outheld Town Beard ef Al~peals
-27- May 25, 1972
(Discussien conttd. Geo. VandeWoude): M~. Nmlse suggested that a
special meeting be called as legal publication has to be in the
newspaper for at least five days. (These was a discussion on the
new regulations which were written to prevent continuous yard sales).
The Chairman read the uses permitted by special exception. The
Chairman stated that the hearing could be held on the 6th day of
June and the yard sale ceald be ~ld en the 7th or 8th of June-
the legal notice te be published five days before the hearing.
M~. Terry said that he would have the legal notice made up amd
sent te the mewspapers en May 26th. The Beard set the time of
hearing as 1:00 P.M., Tuesday, June 6, 1972.
On motion ~y Nr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED tha~ the Southeld Town Board ef Appeals set 7:30
P.M. (E.S.T.), T~arsday, June 15, 1972, at the Tewm Office,
Main Road, Eemtheld, New Yo~k, as the ti~ an~ place ef he~i~
u~en application ef Robert P~kin, Bay Avenue, Cutche~e, New
Ye~k, fe~ a'v~i~e in acceptance wi~h the Zeni~
~ticle iii, ~ctiem 300 0-2, for a permit te build a swiping
~eel in side y~. Location ef p~per~: merth side ef Bay
Avenue, Outche~e, New York, bounded and described: n~th by
~ilty; east by lands n~ er fe~rly ef Per,cci; south by Bay
Avem~e; an~ west by 1~ n~ er fe~mer~ ef ~1~.
Vote ef the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Hulse, Doyen.
On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Mulse, ~t w~a
REb~OLVED that the ~outhold Town Board.of~Appeals set 7:40
P.M. (E.S.T.), Thursday, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Eouth°ld, New York, as the time and place of hea~ing
upon a~pliea~ion of William M. Rap~, Main Road, Mattituck, New
York, for a variance im accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
A~tieles V~and VII, ~eetien 600 C-3a, for permission to enlarge
g~eund sign. Location ef~re~erty: corner o~ N~in Road and
Factory Avenue, Mattituck, New Yer~, beunde~ no~th by G. Drumm
am~ e~hers, east By Fa~tory Avenue, s~uth by Main Road; west by
Getty 0il Oempa~y.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Massrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Eulse, Doyem.
Seuthol~ Town Board of Appeals
-28- May 25, 1972
Om motion~y M~. Grigonis, se~ended by M~..Deyen, it was
~LVED that the Eeuthold Town Board of Appeals set 7:50
P.M. (E.$.T.), Thursday, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Read, Seuthold, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upe~ application ef Je~ Larsen, North Road, ~outhold, New York,
for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Article Iii, Section 300 C-6f, for permission to maintain an
elf premises directional sign on premises of War. ren Hufe, Middle
Read, ~eutheld, New York. Location ef property: south side ef
Middle Read, ~outheld, New York, ~eunded north by Middle Read;
east By Beoth; south By Kaelin; and west by Kester.
Veto ef the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigemis,
Ealse, Doyen.
On motion by F~. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RE,~OLVED that the ~outhcld Town Board of.Appeals set 8:00
P.M. (E.~.T,), Tharsday, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Seuthold, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon applicatlen of North Fork Teen Centre, Inc.~ Route 27A,
Mattituck, New York, for a special exception in accordance with
tl~e Zoning ~r~inamce, A~ttcte ~II, Section 300, ~bsectien B-14,
f~ ~e~miss!en to cem~uc$ a y~d sale en July 1, 1972, ~ain date
July 8, 1972. Location ef ~epe~y: North side ef Middle Road,
Mattit~ek, New Ye~k, ~e~m~e~ nert~ ~y Kaiser; east by Bern;
semt~ By Mi~le Rea~; a~ west ~y the North Fork Baptist C~rch.
Vote ef the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gitlispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Nulse, Doyen.
On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was
RESOLVED that the SouthOld Town Board or. Appeals set 8:10
P.M, (E,~.T.), Thursday, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Mai~ Read, Seuthold, New York, as the~time ~d place ~f hearing
u~en application ef ~sabe! G. ~amohet, Main.Rea~, Cutchegue,
New York, for a special exceptie~ in accordance with the Zoning
0r~i~ance, ~rti¢te III, ~ectien 300, Smbsection B-I~, for
permission te conduct a yard sale on July 29, 1972, rain ~ate
Amgust 5, 1972. Lecatie~ of property: north side ef Main ~treet,
¢~tchegue, New York, ~eunded north by"Scheot District #8, east by
Val ~ty~e; seuth~y Main ~treet; and west by E. 0rlowski.
Vote of the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gitlispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
hulse, Doyen.
Seuthold Town Beard of Apl~eals
-29- . .May 25, 1972
On metiem by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RE~LVED that the Seuthold Town Beard ef Appeals set 8:20
P.M. (E.~.T.), T~arsday, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Read, Southeld, New Ye~k, as the time and place of hearing
upem application of Joyce G. Monk, 130 Oak Street, Cutchogue,
New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning
0rdinamee, Article III, Section 300, Subsection B-l~, for per-
mission te conduct a yard sale en June 17, 1972, rain date June
19, 1972. Location ef property: Oak Street, Cutchegue, New
York, bounded n~th by Oak Street; east by Ntghland; south by
the Creek; amd west by Felts.
Vote ef the Beard: Ayes:- N~ssrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigenis,
Nulse, Doyen.
On metle~ by Mr. Eulse, seconded by Mr. iGrigonis, it was
RESOLVED that the ~outhold Town Beard of Appeals set 8:30
P.M. (E.~.T~), T~arsday, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Read, Southeld, New York, as the~time and place of hearing
upon application of Stanley Waimey a/c ~outhold-~helter Island
Conservative Pa~ty, Main Road, Cutchogme, New York, for a
special exee~tion in accordance with the Zoning 0rdina~ce, Article
II~, Section300, S~bsectien B-l~, for permission to conduct a
yard sale em July 8, 1972, ~ain date J~ly 9, 1972. Location of
property: south sade ef Main Read, Cutchegue, New York, bounded
nerth byMaim Road; east by 0. Fleet an~ others; south by C. Fleet
am~ ethers; and west ~y A. Blades.
Veto ef the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonls,
Nulse, Doyen.
On motion ~y Mr. Grigenis, seconded by.Mr. Doyen, it was
RESOLVED thst the Seutheld Town Beard ef Appeals set 8:40
P.M. (E.S.T~), T~sday, June 1~, 1972,.at the~Tewm Office,
Main Read, SOUthold, Now York, as the t~me and..~tace of hea~i~g
upon a~plicatiem ef Ral~h ~d U~a BeHe Gleve~, East ~in ~treet,
~h~ld, New Ye~k, fe~ a s~ecial exception i~ a~cerda~ce wl~h
the Zemi~ 0rdin~ee, ~tic~ II~, Bee$i~n 300, ~bseetien B-~,
fe~ pe~issien ~e eendue$ a yard sale en July l, 1972, ~ain date
Jm~ 3, 1972. Location ef p~eper~: south side eF ~in Road,
Semtheld, New York, ~eunded north by Main Road; east by C.
DeResier; south ~y Fi~e an~ Lmci; and west by R. ~llen.
Vote ef the Boa~d: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Eulse, Doy~m.
Southold Town Beard of Appeals -30-
May 25, 1972
On metiom by Mm-. Doyen, seconded by M~. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Beard of Appeals set 8:50
P.M. (E.S.T.), T~mrsday, Jume 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Maim Road, Seutheld, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upem appliea~iem of the Eeutheld Methodist Church, Main Read,
~eutheld, New York, for a special exception in accordance with
the Zemimg ~dinanco, Article III, ~ectien 300, Subsection B-14,
for permission te comduct a yard sale en July 21, 1972. Location
ef property: south side ef Main Road, Se~theld, New Ye~k, ~eunded
me~th~y~in Road; eas~ by Mechanic ~t~eet; seu~hby Dickersen
and e~he~s; a~d west ~y A. ~upski and ethers.
Ve~e ef t~e B~d: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grtgonis,
Nmlse, Doyem.
On motion l my Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was
RE~OLVED that the ~outhold Town Board of Appeals set 9:00
P.M. (E.~.T~), Thm~sday, Jume'lS, 1972, at ~he Town Office,
Ma~ Road, Semthold, New ~ork, as the time and place ef hearing
u~en application of Doris ~chmitz, Rabbit Lane, ~ast .Marion,
New York, for a varia~ee in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Article III, ~ec~ien 301 for permission ~o divide property and
off set lots of less than required frontage and are~ Location
of property: north side ef Rabbitt Lane, Wast Marion, New York,
bemnde~ north by MariemLake; east by Crowle~: south by Rabbit
Lane; and wes~ by Ss~midt. Fee paid $15.00. ~
On motton~y M~. Gillis~le, seoonded by~.M~ .... Hutse, it was
RESOLVEDthat the Seuthel~ Tewm Beard efAppeals set 9:20
P.M. (E.S.T~), T~m~rsday, Ju~e 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Maim Read, SeUtheld, N~ York, as the~time amd place of hearing
upe~ applieS%ion ef Constantine Zervos, Main Roa~, East Marion,
New York, for a special exoepti~m tm accerda~oe w~h the Zomt~g
Or~imamme, Ar%lcle III, Eectlems 300 amd 301, ~ubSeotion B-I,
te use am aoeesso~ybuildi~g including coekimg facilities as a
full second dwelltmg em the let. Location of property: south
side ef Main Road, East Marion, New YO~k, bounded north by the
Main Read; east by Old 0~c~a~d Lane; south by Bpinthourakis; and
west by Doyle. ~ee paid $15.00.
Seuthold Town Beard of Appeals
-31- May 25, 1972
On motion by M~. Nnlse, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED that the Semtheld Town Beard ef Appeals set 9:35
P.M. (E.S.T.), T~rsday, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Read, ~emthold, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon a~plicatien ef Gary Tabor, Navy Street, Orient, New York,
for a va~iamce in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article
III, Seetiem 300, Subsection A, for permission to use premises
for landscaping and storage yard. Lecatiom of property: east
side ef Navy Street, Orient, New York, beumded north by Foster;
east by W. Lemzer$ seuth'by W. Lemzer; and west by Navy Street.
Veto ~of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigenis,
Hulse, Doyen.
On motiem by N~. Grigenis, seconded By N~. Doyem, it was
RE~0LVED t~at the Semthold T~wn Beard e2Appeals set 9:55
P.E. (E.E.T.), T~_rsday, J~ne 15, 1972, at theTewn Office,
Mai~ Road, ~uthel~, New Ye~k, as the ~t~ ~d place ef hearing
upem application of ~el~t ~ss, N~th Road, Pe~enie, New Ye~k,
fe~ a v~iance i~ accedence with the Zoning Ordinance, A~ticle
III, ~ctien 301 and ~ticle VII, Section 701, for permission
te ~ivi~e ~epe~ty with less than r~qmired frontage and ~ea.
Location ef ~re~e~: south si~e ef Middle Road (County Rea~ 27),
Pecemic, New Ye~k, ~emn~e~ north by Middle Read; east by Relan~
Ningle; semt~ ~y lam~ ef ~mffelk County; and west by other land
ef Nel~t Nass.
Veto ef the Boa~d: Ayes:- Messrs~ Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Natse, Doyen.
On metie~ By M~. Deyem, seconded by F~o Bergen, it was
RESOLVED t~at the Seuth~ld Town Board of Appeals set 10:1~
P.M. (E.~.T.), T~sday, June'lS, 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Road, ~euthot~, New York, as the time and place ef bearing
upen.a~lieatiem of John L. Pleok, Jr., Neath Bayview Road,
~e~held, New York, for a s~ecial exception in accordance with
the Zoning Ordimance, A~ti~le III, Section 300, 8~bsectien B-I~,
for ~ermissien te con~ct a yard sale en July 1st and 2md, 1972.
Location ef~eperty: north side of North Bayview Read, ~euthold,
New York, bounded neath By land of john L. Pleck, ~r.; east by
John L. Plock, Sr.; west By Private Road; south by John L. Pleck,
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gtllispie, Bergen, Grigenis,
Nulse, Doyen.
$~mthold Town Boa~d of Appeals -32-
May 25, 1972
motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by N~. Gi!lispie, it was
RE~OLVED that ~he Southold Town Board ofAppeals set 10:20
P.M. (E.$.T.), Thursday, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Road, $euthold, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon application ef Margaret Dellanno, North Road, Eouthold, New
York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning
0rdimanee, A~tiole III, ~ectiem 300, ~ubsection B,I~, for permission
to conduct a yard sale en July 8, 1972, rain date July 15, 1972.
Location of ~e~e~ty: ne~h si~e ef North Road (Ce~ntyRead 27),
~the!d, New Ye~k, beunde~ me~t~ ~y Hert~berg; east by Aurichie;
se~h By Ne~h Rea~ (C~nty Road 27); west by Cla~k Road.
Vote ef the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Nulse, Doyen.
On motion by M~. Gillispie, seconded by N~. Eulse, it was
RE~0LVED t~a~ the Be~thold Town Board of Appeals set 10:30
P.M. [E.S.T.), Thmrsday, Jane 15' 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon ap~Iic~$ion of Fred L. Arnold, Smith Road, Pecenic, New York,
for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III,
Section 301, fo~ permission~to divide premises with existing
buildings. L~ca~ion of property: Lot E, Map of Indian Neck Park,
Peoonic, New York. East side ef Smith Road, Peconic Road, New York.
Vote of the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gitlispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Nmlse, Doyen.
0n metiom~y M~. Nulse, seeonde~ by M~. Grigonis, it was
REEOLVED t~a~ the Ee~thold Town Board ef Appeals se~ 10:~0
P.M. (E.~.~.), T~rsday, June 1%, 1972, at the Te~ Office,
~im Road, ~th~t~, New Ye~k, as the time an~ ~laee ef hea~ing
upon a~plieatiem ef Rebe~ Wa~d, ~tillwa~e~ Avenue,
New Ye~k, f~ a v~iance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
~$icle ~, ~ectien 301 fe~ pe~missien te divide p~pe~ty with
existimg ~welli~. Leea~ien ef ~e~e~ty: Lets ~ ~d 13, Map
M. ~. ~nd, Cat~e~e, New Ye~k.
Veto of the Boa~: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grige~is,
Hulse, D~yem.
· ~utheld To,,~ Board ef Appeals -33-
May 25, 1972
On motion by N~. Grigenis, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was
RESOLVED that the Semth01d Town Beard of Appeals set 10:55
P.M. (E.S.T.), T~rsday, June 15, 1972, at the Tew~ 0ffiee,
Main Read, Southeld, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon application ef Je~m J. Rarer, 30 Arshamomaque, Be!xeden,
Se~thold, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning
0rdimanee, A~ti~le III, Section 301 for permission to build a
two ea~ garage. Location of property: Let Ne. 7, Map of
Beixeden, Somtheld, New York.
Veto e£ the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gi!lispie, Bergen, Grige~is,
~ulse, Doyen.
On motion by Mr. Doyen, seconded by M~. Grigonis, it was
RE~0LVED that the Southeld Town Board ef Appeals set 11:10
P.M. (E.S.Ti), Thursday, Jane 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Read, Southel~, New York, as the time and place of hearing
u~on application ef Barbara Albertsen, Main Road, $outheld, New
York, for a s~eelal exception'in accordance with the Zoning
O~dimance, A~ticle iii, ~ection 300, Subsection B-14, for per-
mission te Conduct a ya~ sale on July 1, 1972, rain date July 8,
1972. Lo~a~ien ef property: north side of Main Road, ~outhetd,
New York, bemn~ed neath by ot~er lands ef William and Barbara
Albe~tsen; east by J. Ecopaz; south by the Main Read; and west
by A. Milevioh.
Veto ef the Beard: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonts,
Nalse, Doyen.
O~ motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Gi!lispie, it was
RE~0LVED t~at the ~outhold Town Board of Appeals set 11:20
P.M. (E.~.T~), T~u~s~ay, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Road, ~outhol~, New York, as the time and place of hea~ing
upon application of Gertrude V. Mayer~ 2~95Youngs ROad, 0riemt,
New York, fo~ a va~iamce im accordance with the Zoning 0rdimance,
Article III~ ~ection 3~5, for permission to erect a fence ever
t~ee feet.in height i~ the' front yard. Location of property:
west side ef Ye~ngs Rea~, Orient, New York, bounded north by
Eeybine and ot~ers; east by Yeumgs Road; somth by Fagan; and west
by,yet.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Nalse, Doyen.
Seuthold Town Beamd ef Appeals
May 25, 1972
On motion by N~. Gillispie, secomded by M~. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that the Somthold Town Beamd ef Appeals set 11:30
P.M. (E.E.T.), T~ursday, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Maim Road, ~outhold, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon application of Oscar Go!din, 441 N~in gt~eet, Greenport,
New York, a/¢ R. TruBemback Estate, Hobart Avenue, Southold,
New York, for a special exception in acco~dsmce with the Zonimg
Ordinance, A~ticle IIi, Section 300, Subsection B-~,
~e~ssien te conduct an amctie~ on June 17, 1972, ~ain date
June ~, 1972. Leeatie~ ef property: east side ef Hobart Road,
Seuthe~, New Ye~k, Lets 36 an~ 37, ~P ef Founders Estates,
E~theld, New Ye~k.
Vote ef the Bosmd: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis,
Hulse, Doyen.
On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Grigenis, it was
RE~OLFED that the Seutheld Towm Beard of Appeals set 11:40
P.M. (E.S.T.), T~ursday, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Maim Rea~, ~euthol~, New York, as t~ ~ime ~ place of hea~ing
upon a~plica~ie~ ef F~leda J. Behlen, 7325 Nassau Point Road,
Gutehe~e, New Y~k, fe~ a special exception in accordance with
t~e Zomfng ~inance, ~ticle III, ~ctien 300, Subsection B-]~,
fe~ ~e~ssfen ~e hold a yard sale on June 30, 1972 and July 1,
1972. Leea~ten ef~p~epe~y: eas~ si~e ef Nassa~ Point Read,
Cuteh~e, New Ye~K, LeS 5~, Map ef Nassau Point, Cutchegue,
New
Veto of the Boa~d: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, G~igenis,
Eulse, Doyen.
On motionbyMr. Grigenis, seconded by Nm. Doyen, it was
~ES0LVED~aat the ~euth~ld Town Bea~d ef Appeals set 11:50
P.M.. (E.~.T~), Thursday, June 15, 1972, at the Town Office,
Main Read, Beuthold, New Ye~k, as the time and place ef beaming
~pem application of O~arles and Evelyn Witherspoon, Private Read
Horton~s Point), ~euthold, New Yo~k, fe~ a variance im accordance
with the Zoming 0~dinamce, Amticle III, ~ectien 301, for permission
te set off a let wish insu~,ficient width and area. Location ef
prepe~y: neath side of Private Read (Horten~s Point), bounded
north by land mow or formerly ef the applicamts; easterly by land
new er formerly ef Reed; south by Private Read; and west by Sardi.
V~te ef $~e Bosmd: Ayes:- Messes: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigenis,
Hulse, Deyem.
Seu~hol~ Tewm Boa~.d e£ Appeals
May 25, 1972
The ~e~fng was adjourned a~ 11:15 P.M,
P 0vEp
~o~ert' W. Gillfspie, Jr., Chairman
Respectfully submitted,
MCDermott, ~ecre~ary
Town Beard ef Appeals