Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-12/09/1971 $outhold TownBOard of Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. I., N.Y. 119~71 Telephone 765-26'60 APPEAL BOARD MEMBER Robert ~'. Gillispi¢, Jr., Cheirma~ Robert Bergen Charles Grigonis~ Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Fred Huls~, .Jr. S~UTHOID TOWN B~A~D (H~ APPEAI~ December 9, 1971 A ~egulem'meeting of t~ ~9Utho~l Town Be~d of Appeals was he~ a~ 7:30 P;M..~T~rs~aY,-~ce~e~ 9, 1971, aS the Tc~ Office, ~in Road, ~ou~hol~, New -'The~e ~esent: ~ss~s: Rebe~$ W. Gilltspte, J~., Oha~n; Ro~e~t Bergen; ~ed ~lse, J~. Also p~esen~: ~. Ho~d Te~ry, B=t~i~ Ins~e~e~. Absent: ~ss~s: O~les G~tgents, Jr.; ~rge Doyen, J~. PUBLIG HEARING: Appeal NU. 1!!76 - 7:30 P.M. (E.~;T.), UPon application of ~ervice ~gn Er~ct~Orss ~.East ~l~eet, New Ye~k, New Ye~k a/u Velinski 0~smebile, Traveler ~t~eet, ~hold, New York, fe~ a sDecial exception in aecerdanee ~th~ the Zonl~ 0r~i~nce, ~tlcl~ ~, Section ~GS, ~bsection (b) mission te e~ect an on-premises 6 ft. x 6 ft. prejectt~ wall si~. L~eatien ef property: la~ of Eeke Bros., south si~e of ~aveler'Etreet, E~the~, NeW York, by Traveler Street, east , s~th by ~ieh~-Terp, west by H. W. P~t~e. Fee pat~ T~ Oha~n opened t~ he~ing by ~eading. ~he application for a speelal exceptlen, legal notice of hearing, affidavit a~testing ~e its publioa~ion in ~he offieial newspaper, notice te the applicant. T~ C~~: I~ there anyone p~esent who wishes te spe~ for this ~plioatton? ~ B. ~~, ~.:' 'Fo~ t~ p~peses of this apPlica- tion I represent Veltnskt Olds~bi!e. We seek your permission ins~I1 adomble faced p~ejecting ~ sign.., a square si~ ~vi~ di~nsions of 6 ft. x 6 $outhold Town Board of Appeals -2- ~cember 9, 19?l ~. H~AR~TE~d~Y, BUi!~ing I~spector: Formerly, there was a 3 ft. x ~ ft. sign at that location, triangular in shape. There were also five or six other signs that have been taken down. TH ONAIRNAN: The change, then, would be from a triangular 3 ft. by ~ ft.' sign to a square 6 ft. by 6 ft. sign. l~hat is the clearance from the ground? MR. ~RONTERO: sa~ SpOt. We would put the wall projecting sign in the ~R ' ordinarily wOuld not have trailers running THE CHA MAE. You under this sign so f~ you have as much clearance as under the present sign yo~ would have no difficulty. THE CI/AiREAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? WaS no response. After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant'requests pez~uissien to erect an on-premises 6 ft. x 6 ft. double-faced projecting wall sign on land of Eoke Bros., south side of Traveler Street, ~outhold, New York. _The applicant wishes to replace a ~riangala~ 3 ft. x % ft. projecting wall sign with a square,' double-faced, projecting wall sign with the dimensions of 6 ft. 1~ 6 ft. The Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and Justice will be served and the legally established er permitted use of neigh~orhCod property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantiall~ injured and the spirit of the Ordinance willie observed. On motion by Hr. Hulse, seconded l~j Hr. Gfllispie, it was RE~O~VED Servi~e $tgn Evecters, 120 East 131 ~treet, New York, New York,..a/c VoltnSki-Old~mobile, Traveler Street, $outhol~, New York,-be;GR/~TEDpermission to erect an on-premises 6 ft. by 6 ft. double-faced projecting wall sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. That applicant provide the same amount of clearance from ground level to the lower edge of the sign as existed prior t~ ~his application. 2. The sign shall bo subject to all rules smd regulations and to all subsequen~ changes in the Southol~ Town Butldtng Zone Ordinance as it applies to signs. Vote of the Boar~: A~es:~ Eessrs: Gtllispie, Bergen, Hulse. Southold Town Boa~d uf Appeals -3- PUBLIC HEARING: -Appeal NO. 1~77 - 7:~% P.E. (.I~.S;T.), upon application of ~e~ioe Sign ~e~s,l~ East 131 S~eet, New Yo~k, New Yo~k ~c Volinskf 01ds~bile, T~aveler ~t~ee~, ~hold, New York, f~ a special exception in accordance wi~h the Zonf~ ~di~nce, Section ~08 (a), fo~ ~tssien ~o e~ct an on,premises ~eun~ st~ with exces~ive heirS, eve~ 6~6~, ~d excessive heigh$ above ~ound ~vei, ~e~ land ef KO~ Bros., $~uth side el' Traveler ~t~ee~, Eou~he~, New Yo~k, ~naed north by Traveler Et~ee~, east ~ Ye~s Ave~e, south by ~ieht-Te~, west by H. W. ~l~e. ~ee pai~ The Chairman opened the hea~ing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of heswing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to tt:~ applicant. THE GNAItLMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? VINGENT B. PRONTERO, ES~.~ i am also representing Volinski Oldsmobile on this application. TEE0~'nAIRNAN: The application is accompanied by a sketch showing the~g~ound sign to be on the northwest side of property of 'Koke Bros. The over-all height is shown as 23 feet, and the size of the Sign as 9 ft, by 9 ft. There is also a smaller G~ Logo. 'The maximum square footage allowed is 81.2% sq. ft. and the sign must be located 5 feet from any property line. ~.~. FRONTERO: The sign is actually smaller than indicated, 8 ft. 8 3/4 in..I romnded out the figure to 9 feet. Locating the sign~ feet l~om any property line we~ld be no problem. TNECNAIRltAN: Yod have ?4.99 sq. ft. if you a~e going to add a GNLogo sign i~ could not be mo~e than~6 sq. ft. in size. After' investigation and inspection the Boa~d finds that applicant ~equests permission to erect an or~.premlses ground sign with excessive height, over 6~6", a~d e~cessive~height above ground levet~ over 1~.~6" on land of Koke B~os., sou~h side of Traveler Street, Somthold, New York. The findings ef the Boa.wd a~e that applicant's sign'measures 74.99 sq. ft. which would allow 6 sq. ft. for'the GE Logo sign in or,let to meet the maxi~!m square footage requirements of 81.25 sq. ft. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established er permitted use of neighborhood proper~y and adJcimtng use districts will not be pex-manentty or Subs~antially injured a~ the spirit of ~he 0~dtnanee will be observed. Town Boa~d o£ Appeals -4- December 9, 1971 On motion by F~. Gilltspie, seconded by Fr. Hmlse, it was ~~ Service $I~ ~e~to~s, ~O East 131 Street. New Yo~k, New~Yo~k a/c Vo~s~-Ol~smeBile, T~ave~e~' ~eet, $~theld, New Y~k, be G~ ~s.sie~ ~te e~ct. a~ on-p~emises ~o~d sign with excessive ~i~t. over &t6e, and excessive hel~t above ~ leal, over 1%~6" en ~ o~ ~ B~es., south side of Travele~ ~treet, E~held, ~New Yo~k, smb~ec~ te t~ roll,lng 1. T~ si~ be located no close~ t~n 5 feet f~em any ~epe~ty line. ~. T~ ~fn sign sh~lbe no l~ge~ t~n 8' 8 B/~" x 8~' 8 B~~. T~ total ~ea e~ t~ ~n s~gn a~ t~~ GM Logo S~ shal~ be no ~eate~ t~n 8~.~ sq. ft. 3. T~ sigm s~ be su~ect to all ~es ~ ~e~t~ens ~d to a~ subsequen$ cha~es in t~ $omtheld To~ Zeno ~di~ce as it a~ltes to signs. Vote o~ the Boa~d: ~es:- ~ess~s: GillIspie, Bergen, ~e. ~BLIC ~EARING: ~: Appeal No~ ~J$78 -~§~00- P.M~ (E.$.T.)~ n~en~ application of ~n~ G. & Alibe Feathe~s~e~u~, D0~o~ ~ne, ~tho~, New York, for a y~iance in accordance with the Zont~ ~l~e, ~tiele III, ~o~ion 393 & ~ction 307, '~d X, .~c$ien !00~, for~rmisSion ~e divide p~epe~ty a~. set off lot with less than required ~a and ins~ficient sideya~d ~ea. ~catton ef properS, s~theas~ c0rne~ ef Degwo~ New York, b~nded no~th by Do~oe~ ~, east souSh ~ J. J. P~, B. ~esta, · L. Ne~ris, west by F. Dela~y. Fee paid $5.00. T~ C~i~n opened t~ ~a~i~ ~y readi~ t~ appl~ation fo~ a v~ian~, legal notice of ~ing, ~fi~avit attestt~ its publication tn t~ official ~wspape~, and notice to applicant. . . 2~ ~~ ts t~e a~one p~sent who wis~s to speak fo~ this application? ~. ~I~ ~~~GHt ~ weul~ like wou~ ~ aDle to~se~. ~t~weul~ g~ve o~ house an~ t~ e~tage h~se ab~t the s~ ~n~. ~. ~y ~: I am in favor. ~e w~l~ be no si~i- fie~t ehange a~ .it ts an~exist~ ee~ttion. ~in~enance would not be a ~ds~p. I thi~ it is a~ proper matter. Southold Town Board cf Appeals -5- December 9, 1971 I~t~. ~EERtTONHAUGH: ~he property is diagonal. (Referring to sketch)We, would like to make it lO0 feet in the back and 108 feet in the ..front to straighten this llne. All cf this property goes on an angle. THE CNAIRNAN: 10~ from She northeast corner at the front of the lot and. 100~ at the back would give more elegance, over 18~. T~ O~~:~ Is there anyone present who wis~s to speak against ~is application? (There was ne ~espense.) ~ter investigation and i~ctien the Board finds t~t applicant requests permission, te divide property and set off let wi~h less ~equi~d a~ea and ~mfficlent ~sideyard area located on' the southeast eerne~ of Do~Oed ~ne, ~theld, New York. Applicant~s p~epe~ty iS diagonally s~ped. ~ orde~ ~o straighten the line applic~t reqmests ~rmission te ~ke t~~ dimensions 1~8 fee~ at the of She lo~ ~d 10~ feet at ~ back. The Bold-finds that this is ~ eqmitable division of p~ePer~ ~d t~ Boar~, in gr~ti~ per~ssiOn, w~ld ~ recognizing an exis~i~ situation in to facilitate the elimina~ion of two homses on one lot. The Bo~d also finds that strai~tening the line weald provide more The Bo~d finds that strict application of the O~inance wtE h ' produce practical difficulties or m~ecessary h~ds ~p, $~ ~dship ~reated is unite and w~ld be mh~ed by all properties alike tn the f~dia~e vicinity of ~his p~o~ and in the sa~ use and ~he va~i~ce does observe ~he spi~t~ of the ~dinanee an~ will not change the character of the district.~ On motion by ~. Bergen, seconded by ~. ~lse, It was ~L~ Bern~d G. & Alice' Fea~herste~au~, De~eod ~, ~u~held, New YOrk, be G~ permission ~ set elf lo~ with less t~n ~quired area ~d t~uffictent sidey~d area located on the s~utheast corner ef Do~eod ~ne, $~theld, New Ye~k, as applied for, subject to the fo~o~ng co~itio~ of division of T~ co~ined dime~ion cf the s~ther~ line is 100 feet. In order ~o accomplish ~he desired division, ~he westerly line is~ to st~t a~ a point 100 feet f~om t~ easterly line in the combined dimension and proceed stra~t ~o a poin~ 108 feet from the north- easterly corne~ ef t~ projected easterly ~d northerly li~e. Vo~e of the Bo~d: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispte, Bergen, ~lse. ~outhold Town Board of &ppeals -&- December 9, 1~71 POB~O HEARING: Appeal NO. 1~79 - 8:15 P.M. (~.S.T.), upon appltoation of.Na~y.'HaLlook OtDOnovan, 40% 0' Heritage ~Vil!age, SeutJabumy, Oonr~otiout, for approval of access over private right- or,way in accordance with tho"~tate of New York~ Town Law, ~eotion a$OA. Location of property: south side of private right-of-way, Vvt. Road // 17, Nattttuck, New York, bounded north by'l~ivate right-of-way, 1hrS. Road // 17, east bY George Lascelle, south by Great Peconlo Bay, west by T. ~a~penter. Poe. paid $%.00. The Chairman opened the beaming bY reading the application for approval of access, legal notice of ~a~ing, ~fidavi~ attesting to i~s publication in ~he official newspaper, and no~toe $o ~ applicant. T~ G~~ Is ~e anyone p~esen~ ~o ~shes ~o spe~ fo~ this applica2ion? W~v.~ ~~t, ~.: I ~e~et ~hai-the feral s~ey ~s no~ ce~.i~. ~e. wi~ ~ve t~ foci survey oo~!e~ed and ~de a p~t of t~s file. We ~ve not asked fo~ any s~cifto ameun~ as far as t~ access ~oad is concerned. We will abide by deoisi~n. I~ is very n~row. We de need so~ ~oom fe~ butting. This applloation is simp~ a ~e~ of estate pla~ing. ~s. O~Donevan is ~ selli~ ~he p~o~rty'but' ~nts to divide ~ ~odau~te~s. Also, tha~e is a question, since ~he ~ is a n~ow one, w~t~ we ~eula inc~de in this petition a ~eq~es~ fo~ ~ u~erst~d ~ f~ont~e e~ ~et~r the non-oe~o~mf~ use wi~ ho~ aa i$ d~s f~ ~he ~ole let. l~R. H~6ARD TERRY, Bldg. Inspector: It is undersized as tO width only, .and is oversized as to squ~e~foo~age. ~n to the time t~$ they w~t ~o build, t~y ~11 ~ve ~o ~d 15 f~. si~eyards. T~~ O~: T~e can ~ no v~iance as f~ as Sidey~ds ~e con~e~ned. ., (The ~~n ~ead ~om the A~n~ents). house can not be.e~ 25 feet ~e, ~d ~st be se~ 35~ feet back. If they c~e In ~en ~s ~ now ~ will ~ve to dig Out the old ~inance. ~is ~la~e ~efore us is due to lack of access a~ also $o divi~ ~ p~oper~y se that t~e ts app~exi~tely 1~,00~ sq. f~. in each lot. T~' C~~: Is t~re a~one p~sent who ~s~s to spe~ against t~s~ application? There was no response. After investigation and inspection the'Board finds ~hat applicant requests approval of access over private right-of-way S~Athold T~n Beard of Appeals -7- Becember 9, 19?l on pr~merty located south side of private right-of-way, Pvt. Road ~ 17, ~attitack, New Fork. T~e Boa~d finds that applicant possesses a ~eng, na~ew lot ~ich ean.~ divided unde~ the present Ordina~ce into ~wo p~oe~ which will satisfy the' Squ~e footage ~equ~e~nts ef't~ present Zoning ~di~nce. T~ lot is approxi~tely 310 x ~} ft. to a p~ivate ~i~t-of-way te the ne~th and~ sli~tiy wtde~ at the point of division, as described in the sketch, se as create ~e lets of ~,O00 sq. ft. each. T~ Boa~d finds that strict application-of t~ 0~i~nce will ~uee practical difficulties o~mmece~s~y ~dship; the h~d- snip c~eated is unique and weul~'~ s~ d by all p~epe~tles alike tn t~ ~diate vicinity ef t~s p~ope~ty an~ in the same use district; ~ ~ v~i~ce does observe the spirit of the ~dtnance and ~I1 not cha~e the c~acte~ ef t~ district. On motion by N~. Bergen, seconded by ~r. Eulse, it was RESOLVED Na~y Eallock OIDonovan, ~05'C ~itag~~ Village, ~outh~, C~eetiout, be G~ approval of access over private rift-of-way on property located south side of private ri~-eff-~y, ~. Read ~ 17, ~ttituck, New Yo~k, subject to the folle~ng ce~ition: T~ ~ive~y s~ll Be ne less t~n 15 feet in width extendl~ from the private rial-of-way on t~ n~t~h to t~ new~ created seut~r~ let rm~ing p~allel and ~jacent to t~ eas~ line of t~ property. V~e of the Beard: ~es:- ~ssrs: Gtllispie, Bergen, ~lse. PUB~IG NEARING: ApPeal No. 1~81- 8:30 P.i~~' (E;S.T.}, upon a~plteation ~f A~t~ & B~a ~loan, Post ~ftee' B~ ~, Be~e~, New Yo~k, f~ a v~lance tn acc~anee ~$~ the 'Zoning ~t~ee, ~ttcle Z~, ~ctton ~00, ~s~ctien 5 (a), fo~ missies ~e ~einstate ~ase ef two (2) f~ily d~lll~ as a nun- ee~e~lmg use; ~ca~ion of p~epe~: west sl~e of Ave~e, ~ient, New Yo~k, beun~d no~th by p~i~ate east by y~s Ave~e, s~th by E. H. ~, west by E. H. ~. Fee pai~ $5.~0. ~ C~i~n opened t~ he~i~ by re~ing the application fo~ a ~l~ce, legal notice of ~inE, affidavit at~esti~ to its publication In t~ official newspa~, and ~ice to t~ applicant T~ C~: ~ t~re anyone p~sent who ~shes to s~ fo~ t~s ~plicatlon? Eouthold T~n Board of Appeals -8- December 9, 1971 ~. FLOtD I~. KING, JR,: 'I would like to speak in ~ehalf Of the application, I can see no reason why ~his aheul~ not be granted. It was originally constructed to be used as a two family dwelling. The kitchen appliances were removed f~om the dwelling but I ~elieve the pipes ame .still in the wall. THE O~: Wb_a~ is the squsme footage of the ames? ma: 11,264 sq. ft. I~R. BERGEN: That is not q~'ite enough square footage for a one family dwelling. I~s possible that at one time there may have been more land with it. ~R. ~: 2ha~; property line ran Just ~e ~he back of the house. , ~ ,. ~. KIN~: O~tginally ~here was less width on the road. THE-OEAIR~J~: The a~ea is less ~ one ha~ of ~he require~n~ u~ ~he o~ Ordi~ance. T~ ~dinance was a~nde~ in 1966 ~o the effeo~ tha~ w~ this Bo~d ~an~ed two occupancy ~ 1~ ~d $o'~e 2~,000 sq. f~. Unde~ ~ new ~in~oe i2 will' ~ve ~o have 80,000 sq. f~ wi~h~ ~ter and sewage. I don~2 ~lieve it is within ~he power of this Bo~d to ~ant a v~'iance. ~a~ s~op~ us is ~he size ef t~ lot; This would be c~i~ ~ law. We were in ~he process of ~wo f~i~ use for so~ of $~ ~rge old houses a~ t~ 0o~ of Ap~als said they ~e s~a~lc ~w~d our view bu~. ~he ~emedy ~s to e~e~ ~ ~inance. T~y d~d c~nge f~ in April of 1956. ~ you ~ ~,000 sq. ft. 2ou can, by special: exception, ~an~ two fami~ use. The pu~ose of ~s B~ is ~m adJus~ differences and interpret ~u~ not to c~e the law. ~ts would be c~ing ~he law. This wou~ say ~ a person ~th 10,000 sq. f~. could have a ~wo famf~ dwelli~ so, fo~ ~ ~eason, would ~ to vote agains~ i~. 1~. ST.~: There c~uld ~e one family use with f~ur children, as we have, ~.and ~wo family use with one or no childmen. T~ C~~: In ~he Ouun~y plannt~ f~ Re~i~e~nt ~y use 1.8 ~ d~lli~ uni~; 3.8 for ot~ dwe~i~ units. ~ we ~e ccncer~d wl~h is ~e~e we would b~ve to v~y i~ ~re ~ ~. It ~ ~e feasible ~ y~ c,0ul~ o~ain ~e la~. T~ 0~: Is ~e anyone else presen~ ~mo wis~s te spe~. for or against ~his application? ~'euthold Town Boa~d of Appeals -9- After invest~igation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission to reinstate use el ~wo (2) family dwelling as a n~n-~~ use . Location of si~e o~ Young~s A~'~e, ~tent,'New~Yo~k. ~ ~in~s~of Boa~d ~e tha~ applic~t~s p~epe~ ~s ~ss t~n one ha~ ~equired ~ea under the o~ ~di~nce ~ich is 25,000 sq. fo~ a two fami~ dwelli~. T~ Be~d d~s not a~ee with reasont~ of the applicant fo~ t~ ~eason t~t ~ p~pose t~ Boa~d is to adjust differences and interp~et but not to e~nge ~ ~w. The Board finds that strict applioatlon ef the 0~dinanoe will not produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the har~ship created is not anique and would not be sha~ed by all properties alike in the immaediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and'the variance would not observe the spirit of the Ordinance and would cha~e the character of the district. On motion by }M. Gillispie, seconded by ~. Hulse, it was RE~OLVED Art~ & Barbara '~10an, Post Office Box ~]~[, Bedford, ]/ow YOrk, be IYE1/IED permission tore~rmtate use of two (2) family dwelling as a non-conforming use for reasons s~ated. Vote of the Board~ Ayes~- ~essrs~ Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse. l~(.tBI.~IO i-~ARI~I~t Appeal~'NO'. 1[1.80 ',"8:~5 P.~. ($.S.T.); upon applica$ion of Rober~ A. & Ages P. ~nsel, 20 Bren~ P~oe, ~r~s~, New Jersey, fe~. a v~iamce-in accordance wi~h 2he Zoning ~dinan~e, ~icle ~I, ~ec~ion 306, ~oms~r~c~ new one fami~ ~lling wi~h ins~fimien~ fr~2 yard seiback. ~ Location e~ Proper~y: Oeda~'Poin~ ~i~ Eas~, L~ No. 88 ~m~p of 0e~ Beach ~k, 5~hold, ~ewY~k. ~ee paid $~.00. The ~lr~ ~pe~d ~ ~a~i~ By-readi~ ~ applica~ion for a v~iance, legal no~i~ of hea~i~, ~f~daVi~ aties~ing i~s pablica~ion in ~he official newspa~, applicon. ~. T~ O~~: Is ~re anyone presen~ w ho wis~s ~o spe~ for t~s applica~!on? ~Y D. B~i~ I ~ough~ this diagram of ~he lo~, ~d ~he possible platoon% p~s a recen$ s~vey. {The BO~d discussed the diagr~ and s~vey in respec~ necess~ dime~io~. ) ~outhold Tow~ Boa~d o£ Appeals -10- December 9, 19?l THE CHAIPJ~N:- Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? After investigation ant1 inspection the Boa~d fimds that applicant requests permission to construct new one family dwelling with insufficient /~on~ yard ~etback on property leaated at Oedar Point D~ive East, EOUthold, New York. The findings of the Board are that applicant wishes to build one family house in one family residential a~ea on a corner let, Bay and road front. The slope and topography of the lot create a problem. The Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the applicant. Th~ Boa~d finds that strict application of the O~dinance will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the ~hardShip created is unique and would be sha~ed by all p~operties alike in ~he i~dia~e vicinity of this p~ope~y and in t~ s~ mss dist~iot; ~ ~e variance does obser~ the spiri~ of t~ ~dinance a~ ~11 not change the o~acter of the district. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by 1~. Bergen, it was RE~OLVEDRobert A. &Agnes P~"Nensel, 20 Brer~er Place, Demarest,~New Jersey, be GRA~ permission to constrmct new one famtly dwelling with insufficient front yard setback on property located at Cedar Point Drive East, Southold, New York, as applied for. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hmlse. On motion by Mr. Hulse, secor~ed by Nm. Bergen, it was RESO~VED-"that the' next regular meeting of the Southold To~ Board of Appeals will beth eld atT:30 P.M., Thursday,~'January 6, 1972, at the Town Office, Main Road, ~outhold, New York. Boar . Ayes:- Messrs: Gtllispie, Bergen, Holms. Vote of the d- On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Ym. Bergen,_ it was 'RE~VED that the minutes of the Seuthol~Tow~nBoard of Appeals dated-'Neve~er 11, 1971, be approved as submitted, subject to ~nor co~ection. Vote of the Bo~d: Ayes:- ~ssrs: Gilltspie, Ber~n, ~lse. Somtheld Town Board of Appeals -11- December 9, 1971 On motion by ~. Gillispie, seconded by M~. Bergen, it was REF~I~VED that the ~eutheld Town Board of Appeals set 7:30 P.~. (E.~.T.), Thmrsday, January' 6, 1971, at 'the Town Office, ~ain Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of George0apen, Jr., 509 7th Street, Greenpert, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning O~dinance, Article III, ~ction 300, ~bSection (6), &Article III, Section 309, £or~permission to erect accessory structure (swimming pool) with insufficient side yard and rear yard setback. ~ocation proper~y: west side ofTth~treet, GreenPort~ New York, bounded north bY E. & A. Richter, eas~ by 7th Street, south byA. ttanltaus, west by R. Singleton & others. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- l~essrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Hulse. On motienby N~. Bergen, seconded by l~r. Eulse,..it was RE~©LVED that the 3~thold Town Be~d ~of Appeals set 7:4~ P.N. (E.E.T.~, T~rsday, Janu~y 6, 197X, at'~the Town ~ffiee, [~ln Road, E~thol~, New York, as the ti~' and p~ce of he~ mpon~applica~ien of Thews ~ncy, 3~ Jefferson Street, Garden Gi~y, New York, fe~ a v~ianee tn acoor~ce Wi~h ~he ZenI~ O~di~nme, ~ti~le IIi, ~c~ien 300, Subsection {6), for pe~ssion to locate ae~esse~buildl~ in f~ontya~d ~ea.' ~cation of p~ope~ty: west side Of Bayberry' Read, ~t No. 119 en'~p of Nassau Point O~b ~eperties, A~ed ~P ~ No. 789, Om~chogme, New Ye~k. Vo~e ef ~he Boa~d: Ayes:-~ssrs: Gilltspie, Bergen, ~lse. O~ motion by Nr. Hulse, seconded by N~. Gtllispie, .it was RE~OLVED that ~he $~theld To~ Be~d of ADpeals ~t 8i00 P.H. (E.~.T.) '-T~sday, Ja~a~~6, 1971, at-the T~n 0fft~e, · of ~a~i~ Hain Re ~, ~hol~, New York, as ~e ~ime and place upon application of Thews tzala, Box 299 B, ~tho~, New Yo~E, fO~ a v~iance~ in accordance wi~h ~he Zoning ~dinanee, ~icle I~, ~ction 303,-and ~ticle X. ~ction 10O~, fo~' pe~ission to divide p~pe~ty ~d set elf le2s with i~mfficien$ frontage. Location of property: east side' of p~ivate road-(Wilti~bmrg Drive) ~ff s~th side ~f Ba~iew Road,~$outh°ld, New York, D~mded n~h.by ~ta~ey Peters, east by canal, south by J. ~. G~athwohl, ~st by private read (Wtlliamsb~g Drive). $outhOld Town Board of Appeals December 9, 197l On motion by Fa.. Bergen, sec~ RESOLVED that ~he Southol~ T Mai~ Roa~, S~theld, New Yo~k, as up~ application ~f Stanley ~ ~at] ~ee~, ~ew York, fop a variance Ordi~nce~ ~lcle I~, ~c~ion 3 fo~ ~ssion ~o divide prope~ f~om~age. ~oca~ion of prope~y: {Wi~la~Burg ~ive) off sou~h ~i~ ~ew Yo~k, boated north ~y ~er~ T. Szala, ~st by private ro~d (~ Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Me On motion by Mr. Gtl~Ispie, RE~OIiVED that the $outhold P.I~. (E.S.T.), Thursday, ~.in Road, .~omthold, New York, as upon~ application Of ~el Frey, Ye~k, fo~ a v~tance in acoordan~ ~ttc~ III, ~ction 306, for f~ily dwelli~ with ins~ficient p~epe~tY: s~u~heast ce~ne~ of Ba ~ ~ 126 on Map of Gardlne~s Ba New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- On motion by Mr. Bergen, se RF~GLVED that the F~mthold ?.~. {E.E,T.), Thursday, Jgnu~ ~ln Road, ~thold, New Yo~k, a upon a~pli~ation of-~hleen ~ ~ $ection IO00A, and A~ticle X, ~ ,haled by Y~. Glllis~ie, it was )wn Beard of Appeals set 8:15 ~, 1971, atthe Town Office, the time and-place of hearing ~ri~e Peters, ~1-02 Vernem Blvd., Ln a~cordan~e wt~h the ZOni~ )3, ~d ~ticle X, ~ction 1000A, and set off lots with lns~ftclent ~ast side ef pri~te le of Ba~iew Road, Berg, eas~ by canal, south [lliamsbu~g ~tve). ss~s: Gillfspie, Bergen, ~e. seco~ed by Mr. Eulse, it was own Board of Appeals set 8:30 6, 1971, at the Town Office, the time and place of hea~ing I~tfth Avenue, Greenport, New ,e Wtth the Zoning (~dinance, r~isston to construct private one Ik, ont yard setback. Location of ~iew D~ive and Cedar Lane, Lots Estates, Section II, .~ast l~arion, ~ssrs: Gilllspie, Bergen, Eulse. on,ed by Mr. Nnlse,_ it was ~own Board of'APl~eals set ~6, 1971,' at 't~ T~ Office, s the ~tme and p~ce of he~ng aIte~ Potockt, 9 ~a~ ~ne, Section 1008, for permimsion ~Al~tple Residence with less than to divide property and set off ~ ~equired area per unit. Locatt~m of property: eas~ side ef Kenne~ts Ro~d, S~hold, New Yo3*k, b~nded north by P. Olfveri, eas~ ~ Ralph Glover, som~h b~ B~ - ~ns, west bY Road'vote of t~ Boa~d: Ayes:- ~ssrs: Gtllispie, ~rEeh' ~lse. Southold Tewn Board of Appeals -13- December 9, 1971 The Meeting adJe~ned at 9:~5 P.M.