The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLaurel Estates 'I , e. -"'I'-.~.,,,. ,. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR or VITAL ST\TlSTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 15, 1984 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chai rman Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Dear Henry: The Southold Town Board at their regular meeting held on February 14, 1984 adopted the following resolutions: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold has considered the property of Laurel Estates, located at Laurel, New York, and hereby authorizes the Planning Board to consider said property as being developed in the cluster concept. RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold has considered the property of James W. Dawson at Bayview, Southold, New York, and hereby authorizes the Planning Board to consider said property as being developed in the cluster concept. Very truly yours, ~ Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk . . T RECIMD JAM 868M ... a.t I II II Southold, N,Y, 11971 HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr. . Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI. J r. GEORGE RJTClDE LATHAM, Jr. WILLIAM F. MULLEN. Jr. TELEPHONE 765 - 1938 January 26, 1984 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Laurel Estates Cluster Proposal Dear Judy: Enclosed herewith, for the review of the Southold Town Board, are three copies of the sketch map for the cluster proposal of Laurel Estates along with a metes and bounds description of the property and a Long Environmental Assessment Form. Please advise this office of any action taken by the Board. Very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ~E-X~ RC-- By Diane M. Schultlie - ') 'CLf1.-.<) enc. C~-a'.9dMU'''' . APR 23 1984 - . ATTORNEYS AT LAW MAIN RQAD SOUTH OLD. NEW YO~K 11971 LEf"FERTS P. EDSON RUDOLPH H. BRUER April 19, 1984 1516) 765-1222 (516) 765.2500 RECEIVED Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Hain Road Southold, New York 11971 MAY 7 aJ4 Town Clerk Southold Re: Laurel Estates Dear Hr. Raynor: We enclose herewith an amended description of the above-referenced subdivision. Please make this description a part of our application in place and stead of the description submitted to the Planning Board with our letter of December 12, 1983. By way of explanation, the previously submitted description was based upon a prior survey of the premises and the courses and distances recited therein do not conform with the subdivision sketch plan sub- mitted to your office. The reason for this, according to the surveyor, is that the prior survey was laid out according to magnetic north, where- as the subdivision sketch plan was laid out according to true north. The description submitted herewith conforms to the subdivision sketch plan in your file. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Jh \'.-\ {';'\,/ ,..,7;:.\' - .> r .\ 'j ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being at Laurel, in the Town of Soutyold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: . II I: 'I II \1 I I SCHEDULE A . . II i , '., ,j i !I I 'J'. I , i \ j : ,~ ,. II ;1 i i i 1.".....'1 I. \-l \.:1 <'1 I'J Ir~. I r:l 'j !'", I ., I' I 1 'j BEGINNING at a point formed by the intersection of the easterly line of Aldrich Lane with the northerly line of the land of Mattituck Park District, which point is 1165.29 feet as measured northerly along the easterly line of Aldrich Ii Lane from Main Road and running thence from said point ot beginning northerly along the easterly line of Aldrich Lane II the ro,'ow'"',:our", end di,tanoe,' , I , , I I I N. 340 03' 00" w. 2. N. 320 56' 30" W. 1169.06 feet, 370.96 feet; :j ',,) .;:1 I I I , 270.70 feet, 106.25 feet, f;q.30 feet, 73.70 feet, 117.00 feet, 28.63 feet, 30.36 feet, 7~.;o teet, 26.40 feet, 25.35 teet, 62.80 feet, 86.85 feet; ,. I , I ! j , I 11 I .1 I J ~ .J I I I'.) I] I ,~ ! ':1 I I, I I! 1.1 I" I:' I" 1:1 I ~ l,j i' i~ I ;j \, I:;' ,J.' I. I. thence easterly along the land now or formerly of Kujawski the followin~ courses and distances: 1. N. 53" 48' 40" E. I II I' II I i I i 2. N. 66" 37' 40" E. 3. N. 5f;" ?1' 10" E. 4. N. 45" 09' 40" E. 5. N. 530 04' 40" E. 6. N. 560 18' 10" E. 7. N. 400 39' 10" E. 8. N. 490 42' 10" E. 9. N. 630 51' 40" E. 10. N. 450 59' 40" E. 11. N. 430 l~' 10" E. 12. N. 23" 55' 10" E. thence southerly along the land now or formerly or Roy Reeve the following courses and distances: 1. S. 27" 28' 50" E. 2. S. 330 34' 10~ ~. II Ii 88.80 feet, 336.50 feet; " . . . .(- , ) i ,I i l 1 .SCHEDULE A (Continued) thence easterly along the land now or formerly of Roy Reeve N. 510 26' 00" E. 494.43 feet, to land now or formerly of William Unkelbach,; thence southerly along the land now or formerly of William I Unkelbach, now or formerly of James Mulvihill, and now or formerly of Cecil I Young the following courses and distances: 1. S. 330 02' 20" E. 456.39 feet, 2. S. 320 57' 15" E. 665.60 feet, 3. S. 330 37' 30" E. 1121.74 feet, to thettOtth..tE!stl!rly line of Main Road (N.Y.S. Rte. 25); Main Road thence southwesterly along the northwestetly linE! (N.Y.S. Rte 25) the following courses and distances: 1. S. 410 23' 00" W. 66.85 feet, 2. S. 400 02' 40" W. 293.95 feet; of said 'i \:~ ,J of Thomas thence northerly and westerly along the land now ot Wowak the following courses and distances: 1. N. 330 37' 30" W. 718.81 feet, 2. S. 560 11' 50" W. 489.72 feet, to the land of the fo~meriy 1 1 'j l " -, '\ Mattituck Park District; thence northerly and westerly along the land of the Mattituck Park District the following courses and distances: 1. N. 330 48' 10" W. 379.76 feet, 2. S. 550 57' 00" W. 578.10 feet to the point or place_ .) j , I j . J I i " "I I , ':1 ,) ,..j :-,1\ "j 'j .i j j :1 ~ .,:] I ;~ J, 11 ,~ of beginning. ':.,. r' - ?' ~~. . "LAUREL ESTATES" . SCHEDULE A - [)esc:rlption 8308-351538 REVISED ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being at Laurel, in the Town of Southo1d, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Aldrich Lane distant the following three courses and distances Northerly, as measured along the easterly side of Aldrich Lane, from the corner formed by the intersection of the easterly side of Aldrich Lane with the northerly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25): 1) North 20 degrees 07' 20" West 354.20 feet; 2) North 21 degrees 22' 50" Wes t 303.33 feet; and 3) North 20 degrees 31' 20" West 507.76 feet; and from said point of beginning running -THENCE along the easterly side of Aldrich Lane the following two courses and distances: 1) North 20 degrees 31' 20" West 1169.06 feet; and 2) North 19 degrees 24' 50" West 370.96 feet to land now or formerly of Kujawski; THENCE along said last mentioned land the following 12 courses and distances: 1) 2) 3) ~~ 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) North 67 degrees 20' North 80 degrees 09' North 69 degrees 52' North 58 degrees 41' North 66 degrees 36' North 69 degrees 49' North 54 degrees 10' North 63 degrees 13' North 77 degrees 23' North 59 degrees 31' North 56 degrees 44' North 37 de9rees 26' 20" East 270.70 feet; 20" East 106.25 feet; 50" East 69.30 feet; 20" East 73.70 feet; 20" East 117.00 feet; 50" East 28.63 feet; 50" East 30.36 feet; 50" East 73.30 feet; 20" Eas t 26.40 feet; 20" East 25.35 feet; 50" East 62.80 feet; and 50" East 86.85 feet to land now or formerly of Roy Reeve; THENCE along said last mentioned land the following three courses and distances: 1) South 13 degrees 57' 10" East 88.80 feet; 2) South 20 degrees 02' 30" East 336.50 feet; and 3) North 64 degrees 57' 40" East 494.43 feet to land now or formerly of William Unkelbach; THENCE along said last mentioned land and along land now or formerly of James Mu1vih South 19 degrees 30' 40" East 456.39 feet; -continued- DESCRIPTION rn..;..;;:..... :. , c:..,-O" ",...--';' . . i'-.... ""-;"1;' , " .;~'" >,', SCHEDULE A - REVISED Page 2 THENCE still along land now or formerly of James Mulvihill South 19 degrees 25' 35" East 665.60 feet to land now or formerly of Cecil Young; THENCE along said last mentioned land South 20 degrees OS' 50" East 1121.74 feet to the northerly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25); THENCE along the northerly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) the following two courses and distances: 1) South 54 degrees 54' 40" West 66.85 feet; and 2) South 53 degrees 34' 20" West 293.95 feet to land now or formerly of Thomas Wowak; THENCE along said last mentioned land the following two courses and distances: 1) North 20 degrees OS' 50" West 718.81 feet; and 2) South 69 degrees 43' 30" West 489.72 feet to land now or formerly of Mattituck Park District; THENCE along said last mentioned land the following two courses and distances: 1) North 20 degrees 16' 30" West 379.76 feet; and 2) South 69 degrees 28' 40" West 578.10 feet to the easterly side of Aldrich Lane at the point or place of BEGINNING. . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . , . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART I 4 PROJECT I!<""FORHATION ~or:c::; ihts .1oc::.ur.e!'lt ;'5 de~i~"ed to .US;'i't: in dete!":l':inbg '",n!t~er -::;e .!ction proposea 'My i1ave ! ~f9l1ificant ef'f:!:c: In the !!"Ivirenment. Please comole~~ the -!ntire :Ja':.J :)r.e'!t. ;'oswer,:o t"'lesc .~uestiQns liin ~e c:lnsia!:r~ ~s ~ar: or ~'e aoplicJ.tion ror aaor"'Oval ind ,'t'Ia,y be ~uaj~: to f'Jrti1e~ 'Jertfic.1tion!nd ;Jublic ~view. ~rovide 1ny aaaitiortal information you believe will ~e needed :0 c:molete ?ARTS Z ana J. ;: is !xcee:~ t:~at c:)mafetion af the EAF \lfiTl oe depence!Tt ~n in-rormatiol't cuN"!!"Icl'J -3vallabJe and .....01 not 'n'mlve 1e'rl i:uct~esl resaar::1 or investigation. rf fi1fO~~"=1on r!:_QuiMng 'uch "01';.1.^nol .'0"';'" .. .1 1 . d" ~ -. :;a... .~ ....... ;,:,.:unavil,tao !. 3~ :~ lCJta and 'iOe~iiY ~ac:l instance. . ~;M1~ i'F ~QQJECi: .t~.~€.1NO ,~CCR::55 OF nWNER ({f 01 ff'!l'"!nt 1 "Laurel Estates" Laurel, New York (llama) ,.- ~OfJ~~3:S .liJO ,'rA:~E OF )~~cUC.~NT: ()t!'~9t; LUIS and LYNN SAN ANDRES (';amo) 28 Cadman Plaza West Brooklyn, New York 11201 A~t~'nAVID J. SALAND Hain Road, Jamesport, N.Y. (~.'J.; (Seaca) It.l;JJ V.'J.; (StOtO) (Z;p) 3US!MESS ?HmIE: 11947 ~ESC~!?T!'J.'! IJF OOIJJC::-:7: (9ri~f1y describe tlpe of ~roje~-: Jr ac::ion) Major subdivision of 59.766 acre parcel at Laurel, N.Y., as a cluster development. (~L~~S~ CQMPLEi~ ~4CH CUESiiO~ - !ndic3t! ~.~. if not aDolic30I~) , .0\. S!~!;ES;::U?T!QN (~hY5iC!1 ia!t1n; of over]1l proj~c~. ~Oth deveioo~ !nd ~ndeYelcQea 3r~as) ~. Gcne!'~l ~'arac~ar of t~e land: ~ene!'ai11 unifQ~ iloae -XL' ~~ne!'!ily ~even and roiling ~r lr~9ufar 1. :'Msent :and :..Ise: Urban , [ncus-:rial _, A9rict.dtl.i~ _,0Uier -' Comnerc~ a I Suouroan _____, ~uraJ ~, FOr9$~ l~ 70nl .!c:"'!!qe oi ~roj~t 11""!a: ~aC:M:s. A~~roxfmata !c~!ge: ~resantly Aftar Compt~~~a" ~resently Afta~ ~cmaletion ~e~dcw or 3rusnlana 49 1cr~S ~!C~~S F'or!s ~!<:: 1 0 . 5 lC~~S 1 0 . 5 !C;"'~S ~at!r Surface ~~a .....2.5..3C:"''!S .....2..5...!Cr""!S Unv~~~tat!~ ~~cx. e~r-:.i Or fi 11 ; _!C!'''!S _lC~S ~q!'''': :::,11 ::.:n, J _!Cr'!5 ~=:"~s ,cad3, Jci ld~;:gs =.r.:! "'::;-:~r 'av!~ i:Jr'7""'!C~s _~~:"''!s _!C~S ..1e!t!nc ': ="'!snwat.!!" or ffeal ~s oer ~r~1;:!S ~'. 25 ~l" .;.:.l...) x:2i: !cr~s ui.y::"~'5 ~~~!!'" (:l1dic3.':;! C:J'~eJ _!cr~s _iC:-<!S lL. '"h<1:: i3 "l"''!-:cm~n.!n': soil ~Y~E!{s) .:m .Jro;~~ :i~:.!: Information unavailable 'J. o!. Ar'! ;:::~:"''! :Jecr-<:c:< 'Jut::"'O:loings ~n :Jr"Jje~: ~;:.!? _'f::s ~'IO J. ~h3~ is ~~~t~ :~ :ed:"':c~? N/A \~:'l .;~'! r:} 3/ Lno - ,- ~, '. . 6. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10: ______:; 10-15: ______~; 15: or greater --'~. Information unavailable 7. Is project contiguous to. or contain a building or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? ______yes ~No 8. What is the depth to the water table? feet Information unavailable g. 09 hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ______yes ~NO 10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endancered - _____yes ~10. accOrding to - Identify each species 11. Are t~ere any unique or unusual land forms on tho project site? (I.e. cliffs. dunes, other geological formations - _____yes ~~o. ,(Oescribe 12. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation aMla - ______yes ~~o. ' , 13. Does the present'site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to ,the community? ______Ves ~NO 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: I. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary N/A I 15. Lakes, Ponds. Wetland areas within or contiguous to pnoject area: a. Narra unnamed (Irrigation pontih. Size (in acres) . 25 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g~ single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). . "A" - Residential/Agricultural . 8. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 59.766 acres. b. Project acreage developed: -2.... acres initially; ~ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 22 .' d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If proj~ct is an expansion of existin~, indicate percent of expansion proposed: age N[A ; developed acreage N[A . f. ' NUIltler of off-stnet parking spaces existing N7A ; proposed N/A g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour N/A (upon cempletion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A building square fcot- One 'Family Initial 0 Ultimate 15 Two Family Multiple Family Condominium i. If: Industria I Orientation Ne 19hbo rhood-C i ty- Reg'; ona I N/A N/A Estimated Employment Com.rei a I j. Total height of tallest proposed structure N/A feet. ./::. 2. How much natural . mJ.terlal (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be rem~ from the site - N/A tons ~ " . cubic yards l. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site - ~acres. *only as nay be necessary to allow the constJ:uction of 15 one-fqIllilv dwellinqs. 4. Win any maEure forest (over 100 years old) or other local1y-fmportant vegetatlon~e removed "by this project? _Yes ~~o . 5. Are thoro any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? ~Yes ______No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of constructionN/A months, (including demolition). , , 7. If multi-phasad project: a. Total number of ~hases anticipated N/A No. b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 _month --year (including demo! i tion) c. Approximate completion date final phase "",nth --rear. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phases? _Yes ______Ho 8. Will blasting occur during construction? _Yes _No Info:rmation unavailable ..j. 9. Humber of jobs generated: during construction _; after project is complete _.Info. 'unavailabl, 10. HUlI'Der of jobs eliminated by this project~. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? _Yes -1L-Ho. If yes, explain: 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? _Yes _No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (se~age, industrial, etc.l c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Will surface are! of existing lakes~ ponds, streams, bays or other surface water~ays be fncreased or decreased by proposal? _Yes ~No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? _Yes -X.-No 15. a. Ooes project involve disposal of solid waste? _Yes ~No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? _Yes _No c. If yes, give name: ; locati on d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~Yes -----"~o 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? _Yes ~~o 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? _Yes -1>---Ho 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? _Yes ~Ho 19. Will project result in an increase in energy use? _Yes ~~o, If yes, indicate type(s) . 20. If water supply is from wells indicate pumping capacity gals/minute. Info. unavailable 21. Total anticipated water usage "er day qa!s/day, Info:rmation unavailable 22, Zoning: a. What is dcminant 'zoning classification of site? "A" - Residential/Agricul tura. b. Curr~nt s~ecific zonir.g classification of site IIA" - Residenti~l/A~ricultur~1. c~. Is prcpasad use cons; s t.ent wi th j'Jre:ient zon; "g? Ye s d. If no, indicate deslred zoning -3- . ,', 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit reG~ir.d? _Yes -L.!'o b. Coes project involve State or Federal funding or financing? ______yes ~No c. Loeal and Regional approvals: Attach any additional infonration as ~~y be needed to clarify your project. It there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the' proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid ~ PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: c::~~ ~ r Attorney for Applicants Luis & Lynn San Andres and David J. Saland , Approval Required (Yes, 110) (Type) City, Town, Village Board City, Tawn, Village Planning Soard City, Tawn, Zoning Board City. County Health Oeoartr~nt Other loc.l agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies ~ Clus~.p: ~el. ~ ~lm'''' ~'()n ~ W;;Jhor ~l:rr'y c. INFO~~TIaNAL DETAILS TITlE: REPRESC:IlTING: , DATE: 12/12/83 ,.,..~ Submittal Approval (Date) (Date) l2/D/R1 pendinq 7/R, ~n~ing , '. . TOw"N OF SOUTHOLD . .. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PART II PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR ~~GNITUDE GeM"a1 rnfor~Jtion (Read Corefully) ~ In cc~pletlng the fa~ th~ revi~rler should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations bean reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to :! ~n expert ~nvlronmental analyst. . Id!ntifying tnat an effect will be potentially larg! {column Z} does not mean that it sianificant. Any large effect must be evaluated i~ ?AR7 3 to dete~inc significance. effect in column 2 Simply asks that it ~e 100ked at further. is also necessarily By identifying an - The Exam~ies provided are ~o assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the thresho of magnltuae tr.ac would trisger a response in cal~~ 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any scecific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be ~ore appropriate for a Potential Large I~ac: rating. - Each project, on each site, in each '10ca1ity, will <ary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as guidanc, They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impact, and thresholds to answer each question. - The num~er of examples per question does not indica~e the importance of each question~ ..- INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answar each of the 1B questions in PA~T 2. Ans.e" ~ if there will be any affect. b~ ~ answers should be considered as ~ answers~ c. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the aporoariate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the imcact. If impact threshold equals :Jr exceeds any example provided, checx column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than exah.oie. chetk column 1: d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact ~lau,.consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. . e. If a potentially large impact ar effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less tnan large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A ~Io respc:1sa indicates that such a reduction is not possible.. 1. 2. 3 NO YES 00 . . Sf'ALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE MODE?ATE LARGE REOUC::O BY I1~P ACT [MP ACT PROJECT CHANGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPACT ON LAND 1. WILL THERE BE All EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHA,':G" TO PROJECT SiT,,? Exam,les that Would Apply to Column 2 Anyccnstruction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project ana exceed 10":. Construction on Land where the depth to the wate" t.bla is less than 3 feet. Construction of Daved parking are~ fo~ T ,JG~ or ~c~ vehicles. Censtructlcn On land ~here ~edrock is axposed or gar.e;311y witnin J feet of existing gro~nd surface. Construction that will continue for mere than 1 .!~r or involve roore than O:'1e flnase or stage. - Excavation far mining ,urpases that would r;~ve ~or~ than 1.000 tans of natural mat~rial (i.e. reck or Soil) ~e~ ye~r. Construction of any new sanitary landfill. -5- . Construction in a designated ~oodway. Other impact,.: 2. , NO YES WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO ArlY UNIQUE OR U:;USUAL LANO FOPJ,IS IVIO FOUNO'Orl THE SITE? (i.e. cliffs. dunes. geological forma- \QI t.ans. etc.) Specific land forms: mPACT ON WATER 3. NO YES WILL PROJECr AFFECT ANY WATER BODY DESIGNATED AS ........../\/\ 0 PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15. 24. 25 of the Envir- ~ on~~ntal Conservation Law, E.C.L.) Examoles that lIould Apply to Column 2 Dredging more than laD cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designate~ freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: 4. WILL PROJECT AFFC:cr ANY rION-PROTECTED EXISTmr, OR NEW NO YES BODY Of \!ATER? ............................................~ 0 Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 A 10~ increasa or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surfac~ area. Other impacts: S. WILL PROJECT AfFECT SURFACE OR GROUNO!4ATER OUAUiY? NO YES (2jO Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will require a discharge permit. Project requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed project. Project requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute ~um?ing capacity. Construction or ooeration CaU5;ng any contamination of a public water' supply system. Project will adversely 'affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities WhICh presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Project will likely cause siltation or other discnac;~ --- into an existing body of water to the extent that there will bo an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. 'o!(ERA TE' ACT - I - - - - - - .. -. - L.~~GE I' wr~CT RECUCI:O - BY, P~OJcCT CYM1GE ---:-' - . - , - . - " . .1. ~ .? EXc~~les that Would Apply to Coluwn 2 ~ro y 00 llAll TO POTENTIAL CAll UIPACT SE .~OOERA TE LAilGE REDUCED BY IMP ACT II'PACT PROJ ECT CHA;lGE - - - - - - YES - - - . - - - - - - - - - . ES ,.- - - - - - - - - - . - - - . - - - ES - - - - - - - - - - - - _. - - ES - - - - - - " Other Impacts: 6. ~~ILL PR1JECT ALTER OAAINAGE FLa}I.?ATTE?~IS OR SCR::":CE (-:ATER ~lO :~~::~: ~~~~.::~~;~. ~~~;~. ~~. ~~;~.~,...................... ~O . . , Project would im~~d.e flood '...ater flows. . Project is likeiy ~o cause substantial erosion. Project is inco~catible ~ith existing drainage patt=~ns. ather impacts: IHPACT ON .Ar~ 7. riO Y WIll PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUAllTY?...........................Q) 0 Examoles that Vould Apply to Column Z Project will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Project will result in the incineration of more t~an 1 ton of refuse per hour. Proiect emission rate of all contaminants wili exceed 5 lns. per hour or a Meat sour,e producing more than 10 million 3TUls pe: hour, I Other impacts: WP^CT ON Pl,NTS MID ,'W"LS 8. IlllL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR ~IOANGERED SPECIES, Reduction of one or more species l;stad on the t:!W York or tederal list. using the site. over or near site or found on the si te. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wild- 11 re hatJi tat.. . Ap~lication of Pesticide O~ ~erbicide over tinre than t'r/ic~ J. ysar other tiHn for agrh...J,!!:ural pUl"'t1C5~S. Ot;,~r 1r.:pacts: 9. !oI!!..~ ?R8JECT St.:::Sj,~~lTrALL Y AFrECT ;:ml- THREAT:::iEJ iJR ~1O Y -''''''C.-'E' -'E-'''' /'V( 0 r:.;'tI..i.....,,~O:'I". :.; ::l. 1...1:.,); ...........................................\DI E:x.al'7"'jle ,;;,at ~'lotlld Apply to Colur.m 2. Project ~ould s~=stantially interfer~ with any ~sident or migratory fish or 'Nildlife s?eci~s. Project r~cuir~s the r~oval of ~ore t~an 10 J:~e5 of ~ature forest (~ver 100 yedr5 in a~e) or ot~er locally i~p~rtant vegetat~on. -7- , '-. . IrPACT O~ VISUAL RESCURCE 10.. WILL tHE PPOJECT AFFECT VIEWS, VISTAS OR rnE VISUAL CHARACTER OF TflE t;EIGHB0RHOOD OR COMl'UIIITY? .............. Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 An incompatible visual affect caused by the introduction of new materials, colors and/or forms in contrast to the surrounding landscape. A project easily visible, not easily screened,that is obviously different from others around it. Project will result in the elimination or major screenino of scenic views or vistas known to be important to the are~. Other impacts: NO YES ~O IMPACT 011 HISTORIC RESOURcES 11. WIll PROJECT IMPACT ANY SIT;,OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, NO YES PRE-HISTORIC OR PAlEONTOGICAl IMPORTANCE? ..... .,,,.......,,<8) 0 Examoles that Would Apply to Column Z Project occurinp wholly or partially within or contiguous to anY facility or site listed on the National Register of. historic places. . Any impact to an archeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATIO~I WILL tHE PROJECT AFFECT THE QUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING ~IO YES OR FUTURE OPEII SPACES DR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU~ITlES?..... 0 0 Examoles that 1I0uld Apply to Column Z The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other Impacts: 12. IHP~CT nN TRANSPORTATlO~1 13. WILL THERE BE A~ EFFECT TO EXIS7ING TRAIISPCRTArION SYSiEi'''S? . . .... .." .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .." .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Examoles that Would Apply to Column Z Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Project will result in severe traffic problems. Other fI:'.pacts: rl NO YES ~O ~1. ~m TO .ODERA rE IMPACT - 2., POTE/ITlAl lARGE lMp.~cr :;". CAll IN?ACT .BE REDUCED BY PROJECT CHMGo ". . - - '. . . 1 2. ~ . , NO YES .............(Z)O S~ALL TO PCTE'HI;.L C..... r:~?ACTI' CE' . "" mOERUE LA~GE REiJUCEO BV IMPACT [!1PACT PRCJ ECT CHANGE - - - .' . - - - - - - - - - - ..- - - - - - - . - - - .- - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I'IPACT ON E~'ERGV 14. \IlLL PRCJECT~F!'ECT THE CQ:.,.IUNlTIES SOURCES OF F'J"L 'JR NO YES :::::~.:U::~:?~o~;~':~~;~'~~'~~;~~~'~""""""""......~ <::) . Proj~~t causing greater than 5% incre~se in any !orm of energy used in municipality. . Projec~ requiring the cre~tion or extension of an anergy trans~iss;on or supoly system to serve more than 50 single or t:'tO family residences. Other ir:lpacts: IHP~CT ON NO[SE 15. WILL THERE BE OSJECTIONAaLE OOCRS. NOISE, GLARE, ~I3,ATION NO YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE ^S A RESULT OF THIS PROJ"CT? .. oot7'l 0 Exameles that liould Apely to Column 2 'fY Blasting within l,SaO f.at of. hosoit.l, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour par day). Project will croduce operating noise exceedin9 the locdl ambient noise levels for noise outside of st~Jc~ures. Project will remove natural barriers that would ac~ as a noi S2 scr~en. Other i~pacts: IHP~Ci ON HE.~lTH ~ ~n'PQS 16. HILL PROJECT AFFECT RUaLIC HEALrri AND SAFETY? Examol., that Would Apoly to Column 2 Project will C3use a risk of explosion or release cf hazardous substa~c!s (i.9. oil, pesticides. chemicals, radie.tlon. etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Project that '~;ll result in the burial of "hazardol.,ls wastes" (i .e. toxic~ ~e;sonou5, highly reactive~, radioac:-:ve. irritat~ngl infec:ious, etc.. includin~ wast as that are selid. sa~i-solid~ liquid or contain gasas.) . Storace facilities ror ene mil110n or more gallons of liqulfied natural gas ar other licuids. Ot!'\er imoC!cts: .Sl. I !i";"i-i.\"i, . l,'t'.<i~J I"~UoJt("1 C!-:.'~ilut.1 I '. .:. t .' . t:O:PACT 0:1 GR!)~'!TH A~!D CH.lHQ1CTI:~": COi~~:J:aTV OR iIEt(j.~~:1?H~r;ry 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHARACTEq nF THE EXISTnlG 110 YES CO:nmITY? ......... ....... ................ .......... .... "0 0 Examole that Would Apply to ColUl'1n 2 . . The oopulation of the City, Town or Village in which the project is located is likely to grow by ~re than 5~ or resident hum~n population. The municipal budgets for capital exoenditures or opera- ting services will increase by more than 5: per year as a resul t of thi s project. -- Will involve any oermanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove prime agricultural lands from cultivation. - The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, strJctures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future projects. - '- - Project will relocate lS or more employees in one or more businesses. - Other impacts: /. 18. IS THERE PUSLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING rnE PROJECT? NO . YES .......~ <::> Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 . Either government or citizens of adjacent communities have expressed opposition or rejected the project or have not been contacted. Objections to the project from within the community. OETERliJllATION IF A:1Y ACTION IN P.ART 2 IS IOEtiTtrJEO AS A POTENTIAL LARGE I"PACT OR IF ,(OU CAW:OT OHERlmlE THE MAG1HTUOE OF mPACT, PROCEED ,A PART 3. PORTIONS OF rAF COI.i?LETED FOR THIS?ROJECT: PART I V PART II ,/' PART 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAP (Parts I, 2 and 3) and considering both the magnitude and importance of e.ch impact, it is reasonably determined that: A. The oroject will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant damage to the !nvironment. B. Although the project could have a signifieant effect on the environment, there wiTT not be a sf9~lficant effect in this case because the mitiaaticn measures descr~bed in PART 3 have been inc1~ced as part~of the ~roposed ~raject. PREPARE A NEr,ATIVE DECLARATION o c. ine ~~ject will r@sult in one or ~ore major adver~e impacts that cannot ~e reduced and may cause significant darnaae :~ the environme . PREPARE A aYE DECtARATICrl PREPARE POSITIVE ORATIO:: PROCEED IIlTH e of Preparer if differant from ~csponsibla officer) Luis San Andres Signat:Jre of Rp.sjJonsible Offich,l in Led.' Agency Print or type na",. of responSIble offici. in Lead Agency _ if'- '. . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . . , .. '. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS I~!FO::i.."1ATrc:~ . Part J is prepared if one or more impact or effect is consider~d to be potentially large. . The amount of writing necessary to answer Pa~t 3 ~ay be determined by answering the Question: In briefly \ ~ co~~letin9 the instructions below have I olaced in t~;s record sufficient information to indicate the reason~b'cness of ~y decisions? INSi?UCTIOrIS Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in 'Column Z of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Oescribe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigatad or reduced to a less than large impact by a pro- ject change. J. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is imoortant to the minicipality (city, town or village) in whiCh the project is located. To answer the question of importJnC2, conside~: - The probability of the impact or effect occurring - The curation of the impact or effect Its irreversibility, including permanently los~ resources or val~es . ~het~er the impact or effect can be ccntroiled - The regional consequence of the impact or affect - Its potential divergence from local needs and soa1s Whether known Objections to the project apoly to this impact or effect. OEiE?'I'[NAiICIl Of SIG:llfICAIICE An action is considered to be significant if: One (or ~ore) impact is determined to both ~ and its (their) consequence, based on the review above, is imoor':ant. PART II I SiAiE/1E:liS t (Continue on At:ac~ments, as ne!ded) . - 1/- . . G~~fjg/NH4L ti'tl!1i' .1' ('. r'1'I'.lW I ~ J:- .~,... ATTORNEYS AT LAW MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLO. NEW YORK 11971 LEFTERTS P. EDSON RUOOLPH H. 8RUER December 12, 1983 (516) 765~1222 (516) 765-2500 Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Laurel Estates Dear Mr. Raynor: In response to your letter of September 14, 1983 (a copy of which is enclosed), we enclose herewith the following: 1. Completed Environmental Assessment Form 2. Three (3) copies of sketch map 3. A metes and bounds description of the premises. Please make the necessary referrals to the Southold Town Board for their consideration. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. 1 I"lfl /tf~ t'; t,i(1" IrA.. ~ ~: \ . T . Southold, N. Y. 11971 HENRY E. RAYNOR. Jr. , Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI. Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. Jr. WILUAM F. MULLEN. Jr. TELEPHONE 765 - 1938 September 14, 1983 Mr. Rudolph Bruer Attorney at Law Main Street Southold, New York 11971 Re: Laurel Estates Dear Mr. Bruer: The following actions were taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Friday, September 9, 1983. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency with regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the proposed subdivision "Laurel Estates, located at Laurel. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch map of the proposed cluster development as indica- ted on the map "Laurel Estates", located at Laurel, subject to the following conditions: (1) Town Board approval for this property to be developed in a cluster concept. (2) Covenants a~d restrictions stating the interior 22- acres will remain open space in perpetuity. (3) Covenants a~d restrictions stating the easterly 24- acces will not be subdivided in more than four (4) parcels. Please complete the enclosed environmental assessment form and return to our office with three (3) copies of the sketch map and a metes and bounds description of the property for our referrals to the Southold Town Board. , . . -. ...- Mr. Rudolph Bruer (2) September 14, 1983 --------------------------------------------------------------- If you have any questions concerning this application, please contact our office. Very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By ~7L!;'~~Y' ~.~ Encl.