HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-53.-1-9 Milazzo Family LLC
137 Kings Road
Hauppauge, New York 11788
631-234-8873
November 8, 2005
Mr. Anthony Trezza
Planner
Town of Southold
P.O. Box 1179
Southold,NY 11971
Re: Yield Determination
SCTM#1000-53-1-9
Dear Mr. Trezza:
Please find enclosed a survey last dated October 31, 2005 depicting the wetlands,
both freshwater and tidal, and the right-of-way located on the above referenced parcel.
The survey also contains a square foot tally of the wetland and right-of-way areas of the
parcel.
On the basis of the foregoing, we respectfully request a yield determination for
the parcel.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions please feel free to
give me a call.
Very truly yours,
1 -Lar�"
ko P. Milazzo
Member
Enclosure
THIS j``OR SUBDIVISION IS FOR I , S ON ACRES LOCATED ON
SC , I., 1000-
IN
MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD)
C-ee application received
m Application reviewed at work session
BFL OK
VJ 1 Applicant advised of necessary revisions
9134
2 M
Revised submission received
11^ OK
,
OK
ero-
Sketch plan approval
Q -with conditions
Lead Agency Coordination g/ f-510)
SEQRA determination
2 � V
4 ' h Sent to Fire Commissioner
Receipt of firewell location
(� Notification to applicant to include on final map
Sent to County Planning Commission
o ti Receipt of County Report
"°` ax
lU ,ero.
Review of SCPC report
% •�
� Draft Covenants and Restrictions received ero. oK
0 0
QDraft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed o.` ox
Filed Covenants and Restrictions received
.10 Receipt of mylars and paper prints with
hRo Health approval .
Final Public Hearing
Approval of subdivision
-with conditions
enuGrScni2nt Gf Su`udiJiSivu
PLANNING BOARD MEMBOS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� QG Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Chairman P.O. Box 1179
WILLIAM J. CREMERS C Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
W ,? Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax(631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO yifJ01 ��Q`'
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Subdivision Application Form
Name of Subdivision: Milazzo Family LLC
Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000- 053.00-01.00-009.00
Type of Subdivision: Major Minor - Set-Off Lot-Line
Cluster Subdivision: Yes No
Hamlet: Greenport
Street Location: Pipe's Neck Road
Acreage: 12.5
Number of Lots: 3
Zoning District: R-80
Date: June 2001
Has this property had a previous application to the Planning Board? Yes
Has this property previously received a SEQRA review? Yes
Have you had any pre-submission conferences with the Planning Board? COY s No
Does this application have variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals? Yes •O)
Appl. No. Date
Is this property adjacent to any bodies of water? Yes No
Are there any wetlands on the property? Yes No
Are there public water mains in an adjacent street? �es No
Is public water proposed for the subdivision? Yes No
Are there any existing easements on the property? C�Yesj No
Is there a proposed sale of development rights on part of the property? Yes
Is there a mortgage on the property? es No
Does the owner own any adjacent properties? Yes No
Are there any building permits currently pending on this property? Yes No
Signature of Preparer Q P Qc� Date_,LU,. 21z o of
Please list name, mailing address, and phone number for the people below:
Applicant: Mr. and Mrs. John P. Milazzo for Milazzo Family LLC
137 Kings Road
Hauppauge, NY 11788
Agent handling the application: Charles R. Cuddy, Esq.
(Contact Person) PO Box 1547 (445 Griffing Avenue)
Riverhead, NY 11901
Property Owner(s): Milazzo Family LLC
Surveyor: Howard. W. Young
Young & Young
400 Ostrander Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901
Engineer: Thomas Wolpert
-/„ Y,,,,,,g .c Young
Attorney: Charles R. Cuddy
Other Agent(s):
APPI,LCANT
'1'R ANSACI'I;ONAI, DI.SCLOSOIIE PORN
The of Southold's Code of CLhlcs prohibits conflicts of
Interest 611 the pari of 1-owh off leers and employees. The
purpose of this form is bo provide inf ormati onwhich can
alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow
iC LO take whatever_acblon is necessary bo avoid came.
YOUR NANR! Milazzo, John P. , Member, Milazzo Family LLC
(Last name, rTrst name, mind].. inlbial, unless
you are applylnq In Elie namO of someone eine or
other enLlty, such as a company . If so, tnd(cal:e
the other person 's or company 's name. )
NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check Al.l. LhaL apply , )
Tax grievance
Variance
Change of zone
Approval or plat
Exemphion fFaT plat or orriclal map
other SO 1VlSlon --
(If "Other, " name the activity. )
Do you personally (or through your company, nPoune, sibling,
parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or
employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes
by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business
interest" meann a business, including a partnership, In
which the town officer or employee has even a partial
ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which
the Lown officer or employee owns more than 5% of the
shares.
YES NO X
If you answered "YES, " complete the balance of this form and
date and sign where indicated.
Name of person employed by the Town of Sou Lhold
Title or position of that person
Describe the relationship between yourself ( the applicant )
and the town officer or employee. Either check the
appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space
provided.
The Lown officer or employee or hts or her spouse, sibling,
parent, or child is (check all that apply) ,
A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the
corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant
Is a corporation) ;
U) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a
noncorporate entlEy (when Lire applicant is not a
corporation) ;
C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of Elie
applicant; or
D) Elie actual appLicant.
UESCRIPTION OF RELATIONS111P
/// 2001
Submitted this oIA day ofjv&j5l194
Pri nl: nnmeJohn P. Milazzo
1.4716-2 (2/91)-7c • •
617.21 SEAR
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project
or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: -
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 El Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If differentfrom responsible officer)
Date
1
CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIC&THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT SHOO USED BY LAWYERS ONLY
THIS INDENTURE, made the C 1 day of March. 2001,
BETWEEN
JOHN P. MILAZZO and ROSE L. MILAZZO, both, residing at 137 Kings Road,
Hauppauge, New York 11788,
party of the first part, and
MILAZZO FAMILY, LLC,a limited liability company with offices at 137 Kings
Road, Hauppauge, New York 11788,
party of the second part,
WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of
dollars paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part,
the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever,
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate,
lying and being in the
SEE SCHEDULE A ANNEXED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF,
BEING AND INTENDED TO BE premises conveyed to the grantors herein by- deeds
from Antoinette Posillico, as Executrix of, the Estate of F. James Posillico,
dated January 31, 2001, recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on
and from Anthony Posillico, dated January 31, 2001, recorded in the Suffolk
County Clerk's Office on
01-
w/
TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets ano . s
abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and
all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the
premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of
the second part forever.
AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything
whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid.
AND the party of thellrst part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the
first part wil4 receive 'the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such
consideration as 4itryst'fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will
apply the same first to the paymeni of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the
same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties"when ever the sense of
this indenture so requires.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above
IN PRESENCE OF:
—� n_�
J n P. Milazzo
written. Rose Milazz
Standard N.Y.B.T.U. Form 8002-Bargain and Sale Deed,with Covenant against Grantor's Acts nifo Acknowledgment
Form 3290
TO BE USED ONLY WHEN THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT IS MADE IN NEW YORK STATE
State of New York, County of Suffolk SS: State of New York, County of ss:
On the ;a day of March in the year 2001 On the day of in the year
before me, the undersigned, personally appeared before me, the undersigned, personally appeared
JOHN P. MILAZZO and ROSE L. MILAZZO,
personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is
(are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to (are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to
me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
capacity(iss), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which instrument, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which
the individ al(s)acted executed he instrument. the individual(s)acted, executed the instrument.
r
(signature and o i of individual taking acknowledgment) (signature and office of individual taking acknowledgment)
Notary Mblic
THOMAS J. O'CONNOR
Notary Public, State of New York
No, 4722541
Qualified In Suffolk County
Commission Expires May 31,2001
TO BE USED ONLY WHEN THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT IS MADE OUTSIDE NEW YORK STATE
State(or District of Columbia, Territory, or Foreign Country)of SS:
On the day of in the year before me, the undersigned, personally
appeared
personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is (are)
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their capacity(ies), and
that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s) acted,
executed the instrument, and that such individual made such appearance before the undersigned in the
in
(insert the City or other political subdivision) (and insert the State or Country or other place the acknowledgment was taken)
(signature and office of individual taking acknowledgment)
BARGAIN AND SALE DEED SECTION
WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS BLOCK
LOT
Title No. COUNTY OR TOWN
JOHN P. MILAZZO and ROSE L. MILAZZO STREET ADDRESS
TO Recorded at Request of
MILAZZO FAMILY, LLC COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
STANDARD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARD OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS PFTI IR
Distributed by
Commonwealth
A LWDAMBRICA COMPANY
COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE iNSURANCE COMPANY
RESERVE THIS SPACE FOR USE OF RECORDING OFFICE
SCHEDULE A
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold,
County of Suffolk and State ofNew York, known and designated as Lots 8 to 16,both inclusive;part
ofLotsl7, 18 and 21; Lots 24 to 29, both inclusive; part of Lot 30; Lots 31 to 34, both inclusive;
Lots 37 to 47, both inclusive, Lots 50 to 81, both inclusive; part of Corwin Street; Mary Street;
Elizabeth Street;Mahala Terrace and part of Appleby Place as shown on a certain map entitled, "Map
of Arshamanoque Villa Estates", filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on September 21, 1911
as Map No. 52, said lots, part of lots, streets and part of street when taken together are bounded and
described as follows:
BEGINNING at a monument set on the north side of Pipes Neck Road at the southwest corner of
the premises herein to be described, said point of beginning also being at the southeast corner of the
and now or formerly of Alfred e. Homan, Jr.;
RUNNING THENCE along said land the following two (2) courses and distances:
1) North 16 degrees 47 minutes 00 seconds East, 229.88 feet to a monument; and
2) North 73 degrees 13 minutes 00 seconds West, 115.02 feet to a monument and the land now
or formerly of William A. Reiter;
THENCE along said land, North 16 degrees 47 minutes 00 seconds East, 362.50 feet to the land of
the Long Island Rail Road;
THENCE along said land,North 54 degrees 56 minutes 10 seconds East, 606.47 feet to the land now
or formerly of Samuel Ciacia, Est.;
THENCE along said land, South 53 degrees 14 minutes 20 seconds East, 396.58 feet to the mean
high water mark of Pipes Creek;
THENCE along the mean high water mark of Pipes Creek the following nine (9) tie distances:
1) South 37 degrees 13 minutes 26 seconds West, 22.07 feet;
2) South 18 degrees 50 minutes 12 seconds West, 134.68 feet;
3) South 15 degrees 16 minutes 53 seconds West, 61.77 feet;
4) South 36 degrees 58 minutes 11 seconds West, 38.94 feet;
5) South 61 degrees 13 minutes 22 seconds West, 52.72 feet;
6) South 65 degrees 48 minutes 12 seconds West, 69.21 feet;
7) South 50 degrees 52 minutes 19 seconds West, 38.45 feet;
8) South 06 degrees 00 minutes 26 seconds East, 60.22 feet; and
9) South 42 degrees 42 minutes 03 seconds East, 75.85 feet to the land now or formerly of
Kamaika;
THENCE along said land the following two (2) courses and distances:
1) South 45 degrees 01 minutes 00 seconds West, 161.15 feet; and
2) South 44 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds East, 186.10 feet to the mean high water mark of
Pipes Creek;
THENCE South 52 degrees 18 minutes 24 seconds West, 63.53 feet;
THENCE South 73 degrees 57 minutes 27 seconds West, 42.10 feet to the land now or formerly of
the Town of Southold;
THENCE along said land the following three (3) courses and distances:
Page 1 of 2
1) North 44 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds West, 157.66 feet;
2) South 45 degrees 01 minutes 00 seconds West, 50.00 feet; and
3) South 44 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds East, 146.28 feet to Pipes Creek;
THENCE South 45 degrees 23 minutes 52 seconds West, 69.63 feet to the land now or formerly of
Foti;
THENCE North 44 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds West, 145.81 feet;
THENCE South 45 degrees Olminutes 00 seconds West, 20.78 feet;
THENCE North 73 degrees 13 minutes 00 seconds West, 345.99 feet to a monument;
THENCE South 16 degrees 47 minutes 00 seconds West, 130.51 feet to the northerly side of Pipes
Neck Road;
THENCE along said road, North 58 degrees 39 minutes 20 seconds West, 51.66 feet to the point or
place of BEGINNING.
Page 2 of 2
RECEIPT M ! lQ Z ZO
Suffolk County Clerk
Edward P .Romaine 7e or Dem(
County Clerk
Receipt Number: 01-0054135
Payee Name: CHARLES CUDDY ESQ
------------------ ---------- --- ----
DESCRIPTION TRANS AMOUNT
---------- - - --------- - -------------
Page/Filing $15 . 00
Handling $5 . 00
COE $5. 00
EA-CTY $5. 00
EA-STATE $25 . 00
TP-584 $5 . 00
Cert.Copies $0 . 00
RPT $15 . 00
SCTM $0 . 00
Transfer tax $0 . 00
Comm.Pres $0 . 00
Fees Paid $75 . 00
Conveyance Amt: $0 . 00
Transfer Tax Number 00-37323
LIBER D00012117
PAGE 847
DATE: 05/10/2001 TIME: 12 : 22 :29 PM
-- ---------------- -----------------
RECEIPT TOTAL $75. 00
CHECK AMT PAID $75 . 00
TOTAL AMOUNT PAID $75. 00
CHECK REFUND $0 . 00
----------- - ---- -------- -----------
COMMENTS
PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by.Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered
as partof the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
John P. Milazzo & Rose L. Milazzo
LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipallty and County)
Pi s Neck Road G-------
NAME
een rNAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Youn & Youna 631) 727-2303
ADDRESS
400 Ostrander Avenue
CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE
John P. Milazzo & Rose L. MilazzoM//0-.zzo [LC
=ADDRESS Kings Road
CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE
Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Realty Subdivision — 3 residential lots
Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ®Rural (non-farm)
❑Forest []Agriculture ❑Other
2. Total acreage Of project area: 12.5 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1.3 acres 1.3 acres
Forested (wooded) 7.7 acres 6.1
acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres 0 acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 3.5 acres 3.5 acres
Water Surface Area 0 acres 0 acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres 0.6 acres
Other (Indicate type)_ Lawns & Landscaping 0 acres 1.0 acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? RdA—Riverhead sandy loam
a. Soil drainage: $]Well drained FR % of sitegModerate y weI drained 14 % of site
KIPoorly drained 28 % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS
Land Classification System? N/A— acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes MNO
a. What is depth to bedrock? NSA (in feet)
2
5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: J�30-10% 100 % 9110-15% 0 %
g]15% or greater 0 %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? Dyes Y]No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the.Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes K]No
8. What is the depth of the water table? 0'-6' (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? INYes []No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes K]No
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
❑Yes EgNo According to Young & Young
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
[]Yes 1XNo Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
❑Yes INNo If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
❑Yes [ZNo
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Pipes Creek
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name Pipes Cove b. Size (In acres) N.A.
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑Yes EXNo
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑Yes []No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes ❑No
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes $)No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes MIN
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [Dyes IkNo
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 12.5 acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: 9.0 acres initially; 9.0 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 3.5 acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: N.A. (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N.A. %;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2 proposed 6
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 5 (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially 3
Ultimately 3
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35' height; 50' width; 601 length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 52 ft.
3
2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? R)Yes ❑No ❑N/A
a. If es, for what intended ? To facilitate the proposed improvement
Y purpose is the site being reclaimed.
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ]Yes ❑No
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Ayes ❑No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 1.6 acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
:]Yes ®No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 24 months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased: N.A.
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month_ year.
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑No
8. Will blasting occur during construction? []Yes ®No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 15 after project is complete 0
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes K]No If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes R)No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes ❑No Type Sanitary
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes NNo
Explain
15.. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Yes ❑No
16. Will the project generate solid waste? XYes ❑No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month 1.0 tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? nYes ❑No
c. If yes, give name * Unknown location * Unknown
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? INYes ❑No
e. If Yes, explain Materials removed from the waste stream for re—use and/or recycling
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? [Dyes ®No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ZYes ❑No ie. Lawn Care
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes nNO
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes KNO
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? KlYes ❑No
If yes , indicate type(s) Fossil fuels & electricity
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes NNo
If Yes, explain
4
25. Approvals Required: -Submittal
Type Date
XWTown, Village Board ❑Yes ENo
Town,XAK* Planning Board nYes []No Subdivision 6/2001
City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes MNO
City, County Health Department Eyes ❑No Water Supply & Sewage D;_4gosal 6/2001
Other Local Agencies Southold Town NYes ❑No Wetlands 6/2001
Trustees
Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes nNO
State Agencies NYSDEC EYes ❑NoTidal Wetlands & Freshwater 6/2001
Federal Agencies ❑Yes ®No Wetlands
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Kyes ❑No
If Yes, indicate decision required:
[]zoning amendment ❑zoning variance Especial use permit Esubdivision ❑site plan
❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other
2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? R-80
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
N.A.
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N.A.
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
N.A.
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? LNYes ❑No
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 114 mile radius of proposed action?
Land Uses: Residential; Zoning: R-80
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within 'a '/, mile? Eyes ❑No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 3
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 62,904 Sq. Ft.
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes KNo
11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? Eyes ❑No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? X]Yes ❑No
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ®No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name oward W. Young June 27, 2001
Signature Title Land Surveyor Date
If the action is in the Coastal ea, and u are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
5
Part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency
General Information (Read Carefully)
• In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
• Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
• The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
• The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
• The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
• In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?
ONO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per,100 ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
• Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
3 feet.
• Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
3 feet of existing ground surface.
• Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ED Yes []No
than one phase or stage.
• Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ El Yes []No
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
• Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No
• Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ El Yes []No
• Other impacts ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No
2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO OYES
• Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
6
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
protected stream.
• Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? ❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
• Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? ❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
• Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
• Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No
supply system.
• Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
• Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
day.
• Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
• Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
• Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
and/or sewer services.
• Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoff? ❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
7
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES
Examples thatwould-apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
hour.
• Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
refuse per hour.
• Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
to industrial use.
• Proposed action will .allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
development within existing industrial areas.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes []No
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? - ONO DYES
Examples.that would apply to column 2
• Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ El Yes []No
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
• Removal of any portion of a critical or significant;wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
than for agricultural purposes.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? ONO DYES
Examples that would.apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
• Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ Eyes []No
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
ONO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
8
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
agricultural land.
• The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
• The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ❑NO ❑YES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
• Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
• Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12, Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? ❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
• Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
project site.
• Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO ❑YES
• The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
9
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By
ONO OYES Impact Impact Project Change
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ []Yes []No
• Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? ONO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ Dyes []No
any form of energy in the municipality.
• Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ El Yes []No
facility.
• Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
• Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
• Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
noise screen.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes []No
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17, Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
ONO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ El Yes []No
substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
• Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
• Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
gas or other flammable liquids.
• Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El NO
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No,
10
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 1 2 3
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact Be
18 Will proposed action affect the character of the exisrate Large Mitigated By
ting community? [Mode mpact Impact Project Change
ONO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ []Yes []No
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
• The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes (]No
• Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ❑No
or areas of historic importance to the community.
• Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ [Dyes []No
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
• Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
• Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes -[]No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1 . Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
• The probability of the impact occurring
• The duration of the impact
• Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
• Whether the impact can or will be controlled
• The regional consequence of the impact
• Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
• Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
11
Town Of Southold
P.O Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
* * * RECEIPT * * *
Date: 05/10/02 Receipt#: 8616
Transaction(s): Subtotal
1 Seqra Review $250.00
Cash#: 8616 Total Paid: $250.00
s: MAY 13 2002 .
Southold Town
Name: Milazzo, Rose Planning Board
137 Kings Rd.
Hauppauge, NY 11788
Clerk ID: JOYCEW Internal ID:54419
Town Of Southold
P.O Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
* * * RECEIPT * * *
Date: 071101
Receipt#: 8382
Transaction(s):
1 Application Feep. Subtotal
Check#: 8382 $1,500.00
Total Paid: $1,500.00
S
�c
19!A s 1211
Name: Millazzo, John & Rose
137 Kings Rd.
Hauppauge, NY 11788
Clerk ID: JOYCEW
Intemal ID:36057
Town Of Southold
P.O Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
* * * RECEIPT * * *
Date: 07/ /01 Receipt#: 838
Transaction(s): Subtot=
1 Seqra Review $500.0
Cash#: 8381 Total Paid: $500.0
wV2MM
dame: Milazzo, John & Rose
137 Kings Rd.
Hauppauge, NY 11788
=lerk ID: JOYCEW Intemal ID:3606C
g�FFO(,�c MAILING ADDRESS:
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179
JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971
Chair :
OFFICE LOCATION:
yrs Town Hall Annex
WILLIAM J.CREMERS � �aM, 54375 State Route 25
KENNETH L.EDWARDS 4 (cor.Main Rd. &Younger Ave.)
MARTIN H.SIDOR Southold,NY
GEORGE D. SOLOMON
Telephone:631765-1938
Fax: 631765-31340
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
February 15, 2005
Mr. Charles Cuddy
P.O. Box 1547
Riverhead, NY 11901
Re: Proposed Subdivision for John & Rose Milazzo
Located on Pipes Creek & bordered on the north by the LIRR track in Greenport
SCTM#1000-53-1-9 Zoning District: R-80
Dear Mr. Cuddy:
The Southgfld Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, February 14, 2005,
adopted the following resolutions:
WHEREAS, this proposal is to subdivide a 12.54-acre parcel into 3 single-family lots;
and
WHEREAS, due to the sensitivity of the parcel, the Planning Board adopted a Positive
Declaration for the action on July 8, 2002 and is requiring the preparation of a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement; and
WHEREAS, on August 24, 2004, the Town of Southold Town Board adopted Local Law
No. 18, 2004 "A Local Law in relation to a new Chapter At 06 — Subdivision of Land of
the Code of the Town of Southold'; therefore, be it
RESOLVED, that the pending subdivision is no longer valid and the Positive Declaration
is rendered obsolete and closed; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the application is classified as a Standard Subdivision and must be
revised and re-submitted to conform with "Chapter A106 — Subdivision of Land of the
Code of the Town of Southold".
Upon written request, the Planning Board may credit application fees previously paid to
the Town of Southold. The determination will be based upon the amount of work that
has been accomplished to date on the application.
Milazzo — Page Two—2/15/05
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
enlyn B. Woodhouse
Chairperson
encl.
cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor
Town of Southold Town Board
Patricia Finnegan, Esq.,Town Attorney
Town of Southold Board of Trustees
Southold Town Conservation Advisory Committee
Melissa Spiro, Southold Town Land Preservation Coordinator
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Department of Planning
MTA-LI RR
Suffolk County Water Authority
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany
Charles Cuddy, Esq., Agent for Applicant
John Milazzo, Applicant
Charles Voorhis, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC
Jeffrey L. Seeman, Coastal Environmental Corporation
Submission Without a Cover Letter
Semler:
Subject:
SCTM#: 1000-
Date: :Zee q1O 3
Comments: `/ o )0 7 >EC` �E it'mi j �U ('6IO Si,'c uci
r
l E7Dold Townn Board
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation -
Division of Environmental Permits, 4"' Floor
625 Broadway,Albany, New York 12233-1750
Phone: (518)402-9167 • FAX: (518)402-9188
Webaft:www.dec.state.ny.us Erin M.Cmtty
Nor
Cowninio,w
February 4,2003
Mr. John Milazzo
137 Kings Road
Hauppauge,NY 11788-4203
Re: Milazzo Applicatio
DEC M No. 1-473 3
Dear Mr. Milazzo:
Enclosed is the permit for the subject project to construct a single-family dwelling in
Greenport, Suffolk County.
Please read the permit carefully and call Mr. Tim Cooke of my staff at 518-402-9152
if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
�VA-4't //
William R. Adriance
Chief Permit Administrator
Enclosure
cc: S. Lorence
C.Arfsten
J.Pavacic
M.A. Durkin
C:\WPdM\Cwke\Mfla=Pm t.In/p
NEW YORK STATE DEPA40ENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVOON
Fsei4ty DEC ID 14738.02483
PERMIT
Under the Environmental Conservation Law(ECL)
Permittee and Facility Information
Permit Issued To: Facility:
JOHN MII.AZZO MILAZZO PROPERTY
137 KINGS ROAD PIPES NECK RD
HAUPPAUGE,NY 11788-4203 GREENPORT,NY 11944
Facility Location: in SOUTHOLD in SUFFOLK COUNTY
Facility Principal Reference Point: NYTM-E: 719.601 NYTM-N: 4551.901
Project Location: Along Pipes Creek,off of Pipes Neck Road
Authorized Activity: Construct a single family dwelling in the adjacent area of Freshwater Wetland
SO-15 and in the Tidal Wetlands adjacent area at the perminee's property.
Permit Authorizations
Taal Wetlands-Under Article 25
Permit Ib 14738-02483/00001
New Permit Effective Date:2/4/2003 Expiration Date:2/4Q"
Freshwater Wetlands -Under Article 24
PennitID 14738-02483/00003
New Permit Effective Date:2/4/2003 Expiration Date:2/4!2006
NYSDEC Approval
By acceptance of this permit,the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict
comPlisnce with the ECL,all applicable regulations,and ail conditions included as part of this
permit.
Permit Administrator: WILLIAM R ADRIANCE,Chief Permit Administrator
Address: NYSDEC HEADQUARTERS
625 BROADWAY
ALBANY,NY 12233
Authorized Signature: �d�.t Date
Distribution List
Habitat
Marine Habitat Protection
Page I
NEW YORK STATE DEPAt*ENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSER&N
Facility DEC ID 14738.02483
Permit Attachments
SITE PLAN
GENERAL CONDMONS -Apply to ALL Authorized Permits:
t. Facility Inspection by The Department The permitted site or
subject to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals zed rep including relevant records,is
Of Environmental Conservation the by an authorized representative of the Department
with
( Department)to determine whether the permittee is complying with
this permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 71-0301
and SAPA 401(3).
The Perrinwe shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection
to the permit area when requested by the Department.
A copy of this permit,including all referencedmaps,drawings and special conditions,must be available
for inspection by the Department at all times at the project site or facility. Failure to produce a copy of
the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit.
I Relationship of This Permit to Other Department Orders And Determinations Unless expressly
provided for by the Department, issuance of this permit does not modify,supersede or rescind any order
or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terms,conditions or requirements
contained in such order or determination.
3. Applications For Permit Renewals, Modifications or Transfers The permittee must submit a
separate written application to the Department for permit renewal,modification or transfer of this
permit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Department
Any renewal,modification or transfer granted by the department must be in writing. Submissiorequires.
of s.
applications for permit renewal,modification or transfer are to be submitted to:
Regional Permit Administrator
NYSDEC REGION i HEADQUARTERS
SUNY @ STONY BROOK BUILDING 40
STONY BROOK,NY 11790-2356
4. Submission of Renewal Application The permittee must submit a renewal application at 1cam
30
days re permit expiration for the following permit authorizations: Tidal Wetlands,Freshwater
5. Permit MOdificatiOus,Suspensions And Revocations by The Department The Department
reserves the right to modify,suspend or revoke this permit. The
revocation include: grounds for modification,suspension or
Page 2
NEW YORK STATE DEPA14OMT OF ENVIRONMENTAL,CONSERVINON
Fadtlty DEC M 1-4736 02483
a. materially false or inaccurate statements in the permit application or supporting papers;
b. failure by the permittee to comply with any terms or conditions of the permit;
c. exceeding the scope of the project as described in the permit application;
d. newly discovered material information or a material change in environmental conditions,
relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the existing permit;
e. noncompliance with previously issued permit conditions,orders of the commissioner,any
provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law or regulations of the Department related to
the permitted activity.
6. Permit Transfer Permits are transferrable unless specifically prohibited by statute,regulation or
another permit condition. Applications for permit transfer should be submitted prior to actuat transfer of
ownership.
NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITEE OBLIGATIONS
Item A:Permittee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification
The permittee expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Department of Environmental
Conservation of the State of New York,its representatives,employees,and agents("DEC")for all
claims, suits,actions, and damages,to the extent attributable to the permittee's acts or omissions in
connection with the perrittee's undertaking of activities in connection with,or operation and
maintenance of,the facility or facilities authorized by the permit whether in compliance or not in
compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. This indemnification does not extend to any
claims,suits,actions,or damages to the extent attributable to DEC's own negligent or intentional acts or
omissions,or to any claims,suits,or actions naming the DEC and arising under article 78 of the New
York Civil Practice Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil rights provision under federal or state
laws.
Item B: Permittee's Contractors to Comply with Permit
The permittee is responsible for informing its.independent contractors,employees,agents and assigns of
their responsibility to comply with this permit, including all special conditions while acting as the
permittees agent with respect to the permitted activities,and such persons shall be subject to the same
sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee
Item C: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits
The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits,approvals,lands,easementsand rights of-
way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit.
Item D: No Right to Trespass or Interfere with Riparian Rights
This permit does not convey to the permittee any righttctrespass upon the lands or interfere with the
riparian rights of others in order to perform the permittec work nor does it authorize the impairment of
pe�ghts,title,or interest in real or personal property h Id or vested in a person not a party to the
i
Page 3
"'cv lmllt:NIOFEWIRONNENETASL"CgMKRVATON
ADDITIONAL GENERALVNDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 15(TITLE 5),W,z5,34 AND 6NYCRR PART 608
(Article 24 Freshwater Wetlands and Article 25 Tidal Wetlands)
I. N future Operations by the State of New York require an alteration in the position Of the structure or work herein
authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable
obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the
People of the State,or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State,the owner may be ordered
by the Department to remove or alter the structural work,obstructions,or hazards caused thereby wilhoutehrpense
to the State, and if, upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other
modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed,the owners,shall,
the DepartmeWithout expense to
the State,and to such extent and in such time and manner as ntof Environmental Conservation may
require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the
navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account
of any such removal or alteration.
2. The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized
which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or
improvement of navigation,or for other purposes,and no claim of right to compensation shall accrue from any such
damage.
3. Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of obtaining any other permission,consent
or approval from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,U.S.Coast Guard,New York State Office of General Services
or local government which may be required.
4. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of any wetland or waterway by suspended
solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any other
environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project.
b. Any material dredged in the conduct of the work herein permitted shall be removed evenly,without leaving large
refuse piles, ridges across the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep toles that may have a tendency to cause
damage to navigable channels or to the banks of a waterway.
6. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work herein authorized.
7. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit. the project hereby authorized has not been completed, the
applicant shall,without expense to the State,and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department
of Environmental Conservation may requireremove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and
restore the site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any
such removal or alteration.
8. If granted under 6NYCRR Part 608,the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation hereby certifies that the
subject project will not contravene effluent limitations or Other limitations or standards under Sections 301, 302,
303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977(PL 95-217)provided that all of the conditions Bsted herein are
met.
9. All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the
applicant or his agent as part of the permit application. Such approved plans were prepared by John C. Ehlers,
Land Surveyor, titled Survey of Prwertv PrePa t.,. john o IL=o
revised 12105/2002. Miu+r &Rose L.Milazzo,dated 09/02/2002 and
DEC PERMIT NUMBER
1-4738-02483/00001 PAGE 4 OF S
,...r.va,mcm tx tNVIHONMENTAL ATION
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. Staked hay bales or other approved erosion control devices shall be sited and placed as shown on the approved
plans prior to the initiation of land disturbance or other construction activities. They shall remain in place and in
good working condition until the project is completed and all exposed soil is stabilized with vegetation.
2. During construction,all vegetative clearing and ground disturbance shall be limited to the area south and east of
the hay bale barrier shown on the approved plans. There shall be no disturbance to vegetation or topography
within the area between the hay bale barriers and the wetlands.
3. The storage of construction equipment and materials shall be confined to within the projectwork site south and east
of the hay bale baffler shown on the approved plans.
4. During constriction,concrete or leachate shall not escape or be discharged, nor shall washings from transit mix
trucks, mixers or other devices enter the wetlands and their protected buffer areas.
5. Any debris or excess material from construction of this project shall be completely removed from wetland adjacent
areas(upland)and removed to an approved disposal facility. No debris is permitted in wetlands and/or protected
buffer areas.
6. All fill shall consist of'cean'sand,gravel or soli(not asphalt,slag,fly ash,broken concrete or demolition debris).
7. The sanitary system(bottom of tank and leaching pools)shall be located a minimum of feet above seasonal high
groundwater.
8. Driveways and parking areas shall be constructed of pervious material.
9. Roof runoff shall be directed to dry wells a minimum of 100 feet landward of the wetland boundaries for immediate
on-site recharge.
10. All areas of soli disturbance resulting from this project shall be stabilized immediately following project completion
or prior to permit expiration,whichever comes first. The approved methodologies are as follows:
a. stabilization of the entire disturbed area with appropriate vegetation(grasses,etc.);
b. stabilized as per specifications identified on approved plans;
c. temporarily stabilized with straw or hay mulch or jute matting or other similar natural fiber matting within one
week of final grading. Temporary stabliizabon shall be maintained until a mature vegetative cover is
established.
11. To protect the values of the tidal and freshwater wetlands,a permanent vegetated bufferzone shall be established.
There shall be no disturbance to the natural vegetation or topography within the wetland adjacent areas north and
west of the hay bale barrier shown on the approved plan.
12. The permittee shall incorporate the following language as a notice covenant to the deed:
'Regulated tidal and freshwater wetlands associated with Pipes Creek are located at Suffolk, County Tax Map
Number: District 1000, Section 53, Block 1, Lot 9, otherwise known as the properties of John P. and Rose L.
Milazzo and their heirs, assigns or successors. This property is subject to the provisions of New York State
Environmental conservation Law(ECL)Articles 24 and 25 or its successor,and the conduct of regulated activities
may occur only pursuant to ECL Articles 24 and 25 if prior approval is given by the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation(NYSDEC)or its successor. Regulated activities include,but are not limited to the
erection of any structure(s);excavation; dredging, grading, and filling; clearing of vegetation; and application of
chemicals.'
This deed covenant shall be recorded with the Clerk of Suffolk County within 90 days of the issuance of this permit
A copy of the covenanted deed or other acceptable proof of record,along with the number assigned to this permit,
shall be sent within one calendar year of the issuance of this permit to: NYSDEC, Regional Manager, Bureau of
Marine Habitat Protection, SUNY Bldg.40, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356.
D 1-4738-02483/00001 EC PERW NUMBER PAGE�5_OF
i
i
e0
Ir
a t•
�4
0 `
aLLFa
uj
tt
i Asa/,
Jo Fl ����/f
Wz
w dobio D�
f ,1
0
..p4��
Jo 5 D So
Mp
) � pb
750] ha,J �
I
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS led%
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ��� CIto
P.O. Box 1179
Chairman o= Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
W Z Southold, New York 11971-0959
RICHARD CAGGIANO W Telephone (631) 765-1938
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L.EDWARDS 'y.J��l �a� Fax (631) 765-3136
MARTIN SIDOR,JR.
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
August 20, 2002
Charles Cuddy, Esq
445 Griffing Avenue
Riverhead,NY 11901
Re: Town of Southold Moratorium Major and Minor Subdivisions
Minor Subdivision of Alexander SCTM# 1000-100-2-2
Minor Subdivision of John Milazzo SCTM# 1000-53-1-9
Major Subdivision Flower Hill Building Corp. SCTM# 1000-69-3-10.1
Major Subdivision of Orchard Street Farms SCTM# 1000-254-11.4
Major Subdivision of Perino Connelly SCTM# 1000-122-7-9
Dear Mr. Cuddy:
As you are the agent for the above applications please be advised that a Local Law was adopted at
the regular meeting of the Southold Town Board on August 13,2002 entitled "Local Law to a
Temporary Moratorium on Processing,Review of, and making decisions on applications for
Major Subdivisions, Minor Subdivisions and Special Use Permits containing Dwelling Units in
the Town of Southold". The Local Law Number 3. 2002 is attached.
The Local Law states that the Planning Board Office "shall not accept,review continue review,
hold hearing or make any decision upon any application for a subdivision, whether that
subdivision application was submitted prior to or after the effective date of this law"for a
duration of six months beginning August 13, 2002. The above applications are covered by the
moratorium. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact my office at 631-765-
1938.
Sincerely,
Bennett Orlowski Jr.
Chairman
Enc.
Cc: Joshua Y. Horton, Supervisor
Town Board
Planning Board
Greg Yakaboski,Town Attorney
Kathleen Murphy, Assistant Town Attorney
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
IC
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CLARE B.BRADLEY,M.D.,M.P.H.
COMMISSIONER
August 15, 2002
Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner r" Mfr
Southold Planning Board Office t X111+' .
P.O. Box 1179 L, asr
Southold,New York 11971-1938 '
AN 30 2112
RE: Milazzo 3 lot Subdivision
SCTM#: 1000-53-1 0109.000 Southold TownBd
-
Dear Mr. Terry: P�_�M
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS; "Department") has received
your letter concerning the above-referenced project. The Department has no objection to the
Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status.
Based on a review of the subject coordination, the Department offers the following
comments. However, the Department wishes to reserve its right to provide more detailed
information within the comment period(s) established for this action. These comments should not
be construed as an implicit SCDHS approval or rejection of the project. All applications are
reviewed thoroughly with respect to Suffolk County Sanitary Code concerns by appropriate
departmental personnel when SCDHS applications are completed.
1. SANITARY CODE
A. Article VI Anplication Status:
Our agency has received an application for the above referenced project on July 9, 2001
HD Ref. S10-01-0011 as required by Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. The
application was deemed incomplete by the Division of Wastewater pending the
submission of additional technical information including:
• Test Hole Data
• Revised Subdivision Maps
• Restrictive Covenants
• Certificate of Authorization
• SEQRA Determination
*DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY•OFFICE OF ECOLOGY♦RIVERHEAD COUNTY CENTER♦RIVERHEAD NY 11901-3397
Phone(631)852-2077 Fu(631)852-2743
• Town Wetlands Permit
• Water Availability Letter
• NYSDEC Approval or Wetlands Permit
The applicants must comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code
and relevant construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Design and flow
specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review
of this project. These considerations are reviewed completely at the time of SCDHS application.
B. SCDHS Jurisdiction
The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water
supply systems. The applicant,therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system
without Health Department approval. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions,
and complete site plan details are essential to the review of this project. These considerations are
reviewed completely at the time of SCDHS application.
2. Natural Resources:
A. The SCDHS fully supports all efforts to maximize protection of natural resources, which may
be impacted upon by construction and development activities. It is the position of the department
that the SEQRA review process provides the greatest opportunity for comprehensive
consideration of these resources,and those all-practicable planning measures should be employed
to help ensure their protection.
In general, the department encourages the following land use measures be considered
(where appropriate)to actions being reviewed pursuant to SEQRA:
• Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less than 10%.
• Maximum use of native species for landscaping purposes.
■ Minimal use of fertilizer-dependent turf and landscaping.
• Employment of stormwater runoff control measures necessary to maintain runoff on-site.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. If you have any questions,
please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2741.
Sinnc�eereely,
ly,,
�
Kimberly Shaw
Principal Environmental Analyst
KS/amf
PC: Walter Dawydiak, P.E.
Stephen Costa, P.E.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS gUFFOJ/r G
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179
Chairmano= � Town Hall, 63096 State Route 25
H Z Southold, New York 11971-0959
RICHARD CAGGIANO 0 Telephone(631) 765-1938
WILLIAM J.CREMERS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS y�Ol ��0� Fax (631) 765-3136
MARTIN SIDOR,JR.
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
August 13, 2002
Mr. Charles Cuddy
PO Box 1547
Riverhead, NY 11792
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for John & Rose Milazzo
Located on Pipes Creek & bordered on the north by the LIRR track in Greenport
SCTM#1000-53-1-9 Zoning District: R-80
Dear Mr. Cuddy:
The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, August 12, 2002,
adopted the following resolution:
WHEREAS, this proposal is to subdivide a 12.54 acre parcel into 3 single family lots;
and
WHEREAS, due to the sensitivity of the parcel, the Planning Board adopted a Positive
Declaration for the action on July 8, 2002 and is requiring the preparation of a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board, in order to ensure the expeditious completion of this
project in a manner that will not cause undue delay to pending applications, seeks
assistance on a consulting basis to advance this project in a timely fashion, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board seeks to retain the services of Nelson, Pope & Voorhis,
LLC, in this regard due to their familiarity with the Town, track record in assisting with
project review and special projects over a fourteen (14) year period (with the
predecessor firm Charles Voorhis & Associates), recent completion of the Water Supply
Management & Water Protection Strategy document, geographic information system
capabilities for regional land use and environmental impact analysis, and their ability to
interact and integrate with Town Staff to achieve the desired results in a cost effective
timely basis;
Milazzo— Page Two —August 13, 2002
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Board hereby retains Nelson,
Pope & Voorhis, LLC to assist with SEQRA administration, scoping, review and findings
of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements for the above action.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Enc.
cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor
Town of Southold Town Board
Greg Yakaboski, Esq.,Town Attorney
Town of Southold Board of Trustees
Southold Town Conservation Advisory Committee
Melissa Spiro, Southold Town Land Preservation Coordinator
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Sharon Gustafson, MTA-LIRR
Suffolk County Water Authority
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany
Charles Cuddy, Esq., Applicant Agent
John Milazzo, Applicant
Charles Voorhis, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC
Jeffrey L. Seeman, Coastal Environmental Corporation
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK •
a
ROBERT J. GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
THOMAS ISLES, AICP
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
August 12, 2002
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
Town of Southold Planning Bd.
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: John Milazzo EIS Draft Scope AUG 1 J LUUL
S.C.T.M. No.: 1000-53-01-9
S.C.P.C. No.: S-LS-G-1839 Southold Town
Dear Mr. Orlowski: Planning Board
Your notification for SEQR Coordination was received by our agency on 8/2/02.
Please be advised that our agency, the Suffolk County Planning Commission has no
objection to the Town of Southold assuming Lead Agency status for the above referenced.
The Suffolk County Planning Commission reserves the right to comment on this proposed
action in the future and wants to be kept informed of all actions taken pursuant to SEQRA and to be
provided with copies of all EAF's, DEIS's and FEIS's, etc. Please note, that prior to final approval
any associated land divison should be referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for
review.
Sinc ely,
n '
Andrew P. Freleng, AICP
Principal Planner
APF:cc
G\CCHORNY(SUBDINSEORAU2 2\SD1839.AUG
LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS
H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. -4TH FLOOR ■ P. 0. BOX 6100 • (631) 853-5 190
100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 1 1 788-0099 TELECOPIER (631) 853-4044
f
gUfFO(,�
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ��� Ca
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Gy P.O. Box 1179
Chairman C Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
h 2 Southold, New York 11971-0959
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNETH L.EDWARDS O .F Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y Fax (631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To: Coordinating Agencies
From: The Planning Board
Date: July 31, 2002
Re: John Milazzo EIS Draft Scope
SCTM#1000-53-01-9
Pipes Neck Road, Greenport
Please find the attached Draft Scope for the above referenced project for your perusal and
comment. A scoping session is set for August 15, 2002 at 4:00 pm at the Southold Town
Hall Meeting Room, 53095 Main Road, Southold.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call our staff at(631)-765-1938.
Enc.
Cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor
Town of Southold Town Board
Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney
Town of Southold Board of Trustees
Southold Conservation Advisory Committee
Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Sharon Gustafson, MTA-LIRR
Suffolk County Water Authority
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany
Charles Cuddy, Esq., Applicant Agent
John Milazzo, Applicant
Chic Voorhis, Nelson, Pope &Voorhis, LLC
Jeffrey L. Seeman, Coastal Environmental Corporation
Milazzo DEIS Proposed Draft Scope of Issues
July 10, 2002
Action: SEQRA Positive Declaration Notice dated May 13, 2002
Town of Southold Project Number 1000-53-01-09
Location: Pipes Neck Peninsula, Greenport a.k.a. SCTM # 1000-53-01-9/Milazzo
Cluster Sketch Plan
Description: Subdivision of 12.5254 acre parcel into three (3) residential lots.
Lead Agency:Southold Town Planning Board, Southold, New York
Applicant: John Milazzo: C/o Charles R. Cuddy, Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 1547
Riverhead, New York 11901
Tel. 631-369-8200
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement shall be prepared in compliance with the New
York State Environmental Quality Review Act standards generally described in
6NYCRR Part 617.9.
• Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cover Sheet
-Title
-Name & type of action
-Location
-Lead agency information
-Preparer information
-Date of Acceptance
-Comment deadline date
• Table of Contents
-Sections and page numbers
1. Executive Summary
H. Existing Conditions/Environmental Setting
A. General Description of Action , Purpose,Need & Location
B. Topography: Slopes, site elevations with respect to Pipes Creek
C. Vegetation: General description of plants on site
D. Wildlife: Types and Habitats of Significance
E. Wetlands: Tidal & Freshwater delineations and verification by
NYSDEC/Southold
F. Water Resources: Surface, subsurface, potable water availability and service
G. Precipitation & Recharge: drainage basin description and hydrology
H. Soils: types, descriptions of characteristics, site locations
1. Traffic & Roadway System: local network, site access, right of ways
J. Existing Development: types and number of units
K. Community Character & Services
L. ArchaeologicaUCultural resources
III. Potential Significant Environmental Impacts
A. Wildlife: Impact potential on clearing within significant habitats.
B. Topography and Drainage: Assess alteration of regional drainage basin.
C. Vegetation: Clearing limits and proposed restrictions on development
D. Wetlands: Tidal and Freshwater Wetland Permitted Activities and restrictions
on clearing and development (as Special Conditions)
E. Soils: Permeability constraints
F. Groundwater& Water Supply: Increased demand/SGPA evaluation
G. Sanitary Disposal: conformance with SCDOH requirements
H. Open Space/Preserved Areas and Southold Community Preservation
Plan/Public Purchase
I. Community Character & Services
J. Visual
K. Archaeological/Cultural resources
L. Temporary Impacts
W. Mitigating Measures
A. Vegetation: Applicability of low maintenance landscaping, native plants and
clearing limits.
B. Wildlife: Potential mitigation using clearing limits to build wildlife corridors.
C. Topography & Hydrology: Potential for vegetated filter strips and storm water
controls.
D. Wetlands: special permit conditions/avoidance of impacts
E. Soils: Potential of imported soils for improved permeability.
F. Groundwater& Water Supply: Low/non-irrigated areas.
G. Sanitary Disposal: Potential of imported soils for improved permeability and
elevation changes.
H. Open Space/Preserved Areas and Southold Community Preservation Plan,
Public Purchase
I. Community Character& Services
J. Archaeological/Cultural Resources: Avoidance
K. Temporary Impacts
L. Visual Mitigation: Screening with vegetation
M. Community Services
N. Traffic
V. Adverse Environmental Effects That Cannot Be Avoided if the
Project is Implemented
VI. Growth Inducing Aspects
VII. Alternatives
A. Alternative Residential Subdivision Layouts & Clusters
B. Preservation and Acquisition
C. No Build
VIII. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
IX. Appendices/References
Historical files relating to the application
SEQRA record
Correspondence relative to the application
Information referenced in the EIS unless footnoted
Prepared by.
Coastal Environmental Corporation
42 Lewis Road
East Quogue, NY]]942
Jeffrey L. Seeman, CEP REM
f
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING STATE OF NEW YORK)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that,pursuant to Section 276 of the )SS:
Town Law and Section of the CQU�y OF SUFFO K)
State Environmental Quality
Review
Act,a public hearing will be held by 4i9� Ni✓ f � Of Mattituck, In said
the Southold Town Planning Board, county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is
at the Town Hall, Main Road,
Southold,New York in said Town on Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly
the 15th day of August,2002 on the newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of
question of the following: Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York,
3:00 p.m. Scoping Session for the
preparation of a Generic and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed
Environmental Impact Statement for copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper
the Hog Neck Peninsula. The geo-
graphic boundaries of the study once each week for weeks succes-
encompassall waterbodiesand lands sively, commencing on the day
located to the south and east of of f�'d�dST 2002)
Goose Creek and Elizabeth Lane
and east of Corey Creek in Southold,
Town of Southold, County of `// ¢ L�Ll1 -rte
Suffolk,State of New York.
4:00 p.m. Scoping Session for the rincipal Clerk
preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement for the proposed p
minor subdivision of John & Rose Sworn to b fore me this e)
Milazzo.The property is located on day of 20-Q.91—
\ Pipes Creek&bordered on the north J
by the LIRR track in Greenport,
-G`�""'
Town of Southold, County of
Suffolk,State of New York. Suffolk LAURA E. BONDARCHUK
County Tax Map Number 1000-53-1- Notary Public, State of New York
9 No 01B06067958 _
Draft Scopes are available on the Qualified in Suffolk County
Town of Southold's web Site My Commission Expires Dec. 24, 20-P)
(www.northfork.net/southold) and
the Planning Board Office.
Dated:8/5/02
�..BY ORDER OF THE
SOUTHOLD
TOWN)PLANNING BOARD
Bennett 0#viowski,Jr.Chairman
?4l7.2T A,A,
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �pS�FFO�,�co •
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. =Z'O Gy P.O. Box 1179
Chairman O Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
WILLIAM J. CREMERS Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y Fax (631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO 'J101 #t �a0
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To: Coordinating Agencies
From: The Planning Board
Date: July 31, 2002
Re: John Milazzo EIS Draft Scope
SCTM#1000-53-01-9
Pipes Neck Road, Greenport
Please find the attached Draft Scope for the above referenced project for your perusal and
comment. A scoping session is set for August 15, 2002 at 4:00 pm at the Southold Town
Hall Meeting Room, 53095 Main Road, Southold.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call our staff at(631)-765-1938.
Enc.
Cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor
Town of Southold Town Board
Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney
Town of Southold Board of Trustees ✓
Southold Conservation Advisory Committee
Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Sharon Gustafson, MTA-LIRR
Suffolk County Water Authority ✓
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany ✓
Charles Cuddy, Esq., Applicant Agent
John Milazzo, Applicant
Chic Voorhis,Nelson, Pope&Voorhis, LLC
Jeffrey L. Seeman, Coastal Environmental Corporation
Milazzo DEIS Proposed Draft Scope of Issues
July 10, 2002
Action: SEQRA Positive Declaration Notice dated May 13, 2002
Town of Southold Project Number 1000-53-01-09
Location: Pipes Neck Peninsula, Greenport a.k.a. SCTM# 1000-53-01-9/Milazzo
Cluster Sketch Plan
Description: Subdivision of 12.5254 acre parcel into three (3) residential lots.
Lead Agency:Southold Town Planning Board, Southold, New York
Applicant: John Milazzo: C/o Charles R. Cuddy, Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 1547
Riverhead, New York 11901
Tel. 631-369-8200
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement shall be prepared in compliance with the New
York State Environmental Quality Review Act standards generally described in
6NYCRR Part 617.9.
• Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cover Sheet
-Title
-Name & type of action
-Location
-Lead agency information
-Preparer information
-Date of Acceptance
-Comment deadline date
• Table of Contents
-Sections and page numbers
I. Executive Summary
Il. Existing Conditions/Environmental Setting
A. General Description of Action , Purpose,Need& Location
B. Topography: Slopes, site elevations with respect to Pipes Creek
C. Vegetation: General description of plants on site
D. Wildlife: Types and Habitats of Significance
E. Wetlands: Tidal & Freshwater delineations and verification by
NYSDEC/Southold
F. Water Resources: Surface, subsurface, potable water availability and service
G. Precipitation& Recharge: drainage basin description and hydrology
H. Soils: types, descriptions of characteristics, site locations
I. Traffic & Roadway System: local network, site access, right of ways
J. Existing Development: types and number of units
K. Community Character& Services
L. Archaeological/Cultural resources
III. Potential Significant Environmental Impacts
A. Wildlife: Impact potential on clearing within significant habitats.
B. Topography and Drainage: Assess alteration of regional drainage basin.
C. Vegetation: Clearing limits and proposed restrictions on development
D. Wetlands: Tidal and Freshwater Wetland Permitted Activities and restrictions
on clearing and development (as Special Conditions)
E. Soils: Permeability constraints
F. Groundwater& Water Supply: Increased demand/SGPA evaluation
G. Sanitary Disposal: conformance with SCDOH requirements
H. Open Space/Preserved Areas and Southold Community Preservation
Plan/Public Purchase
I. Community Character & Services
J. Visual
K. Archaeological/Cultural resources
L. Temporary Impacts
IV. Mitigating Measures
A. Vegetation: Applicability of low maintenance landscaping, native plants and
clearing limits.
B. Wildlife: Potential mitigation using clearing limits to build wildlife corridors.
C. Topography & Hydrology: Potential for vegetated filter strips and storm water
controls.
D. Wetlands: special permit conditions/avoidance of impacts
E. Soils: Potential of imported soils for improved permeability.
F. Groundwater & Water Supply: Low/non-irrigated areas.
G. Sanitary Disposal: Potential of imported soils for improved permeability and
elevation changes.
H. Open Space/Preserved Areas and Southold Community Preservation Plan,
Public Purchase
L Community Character& Services
J. ArchaeologicaUCultural Resources: Avoidance
K. Temporary Impacts
L. Visual Mitigation: Screening with vegetation
M. Community Services
N. Traffic
V. Adverse Environmental Effects That Cannot Be Avoided if the
Project is Implemented
VI. Growth Inducing Aspects
VII. Alternatives
A. Alternative Residential Subdivision Layouts & Clusters
B. Preservation and Acquisition
C. No Build
VIII. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
IX. Appendices/References
Historical files relating to the application
SEQRA record
Correspondence relative to the application
Information referenced in the EIS unless footnoted
Prepared by:
Coastal Environmental Corporation
42 Lewis Road
East Quogue, NY 11942
Jeffrey L. Seeman, CEP REM
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o�pSUFFO(,+-CO •
(/ P.O. Box 1179
BENNE'r1' O I,JR.
Chairman
� < *p' Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
WILLIAM J. CRE1\1ERS H Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L. EDWARDS O ,F h Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR.
'l' ! Fax (631) 765-3136
RICILIRD CAGGIANO
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
July 30, 2002
Mr. Charles Cuddy
P.O. Box 1547
Riverhead, NY 11901
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for John & Rose Milazzo
Located on Pipes Creek &bordered on the north by the LIRR track in Greenport
SCTM#1000-53-1-9 Zoning District: R-80
Dear Mr. Cuddy:
The Southold Town Planning Board has retained the firm of Nelson Pope and Voorhis, LLC to
manage the scoping session, review of the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements and
issue a findings statement for the above listed project. The estimate, which totals $9.000.00, is
enclosed for your perusal. No action on the application will be made until the fee is received.
Please remit a $9000.00 retainer to this department at your convenience.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at 631-765-1938.
Sincerely,
r
ark Terry
Senior Envir rental Planner
cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor
Southold Town Board
C, Town Attorney
John Cushman, Accounting
Board ofTrusteeS
Southold Conservation Advisory Committee
Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Department of Public Works
NYSDEC - Stony Brook
Nc�c York State Department of Transportation
Suffolk County Water Authority
Sharon Gustafson, MTA-LIRR
John Miluzzo, Applicant
-' 4 5-2rm c�+A 25 1257 P.92;95 _. _.
NELSON, POPE S VOORHIS, LLC
E V I P G I� Y L I r .'l L L A 'N N _ G C 0 N S LI L T NJ
PFLEs ' JCCAHIS CCF', CF AP HUP J ..CERN q PL ci 00NNEJ.1 PE
VICTCPBRT PE JCEEFn P CPFAN.A,Pt I 90eEI7 G.NC=N.JR.PCgikv, .
L 1, Rd '
July 25. 2002
Mark Terry Senior Hnvironmental Planner
Town of Southold Planning Board
Tov;n 13.,11 `309x_ State Rotate 25
P.O. box i i�'9
Southold, New York 11571-0959
Re: Proposal of Services
Milazw Subdivision,Greenport
Environmental Impact Statement
SEW/Euvironmentsil Review Services
NP&V 001220
Dear Mark:
I am pleased to submit this proposal to assist the Town of Southold in the review of the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the above referenced project. Nelson, Pope & Voorhis
and our sister company, Nelson & Pope, have significant experience in assisting municipalities with
administration of projects under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and
technical evaluation of projects and EIS documents. To assist tate Town we have developed an
itemized scope of services to be completed, based on phases of the review process/Exhibit A). Each
section includes a description of services with products identified in italics, and the anticipated
budget for ser%ices following each suction.
Nelson, Pope & Voorhis will utilize qualified personnel within the firm including professional
engineers, traffic engineers, certified planners, certified environmental professionals, and
professional disciplines as appropriate for each phase of the review. Exhibit B contains a Rate
_Ach�dule frrr rhnr personnel which be_;Avolved�ytq-ptojectview—�—Town-of-Southold— -
will receive an iternized invoice with staff time expended in the completion of these tasks.
Pleasr review the scope of services and proposal format and advise if you require any discussion or
changes. We are able to commence rhe project immediately, and I took forward to working with you
on this pealed
Very truly yours,
Nt:tsoH,PoPF&Vo is,LLC
00!�"
%
harps J. Voorhis, CEP,
572 WA1 r WHITMAN ROAD. MELViLLE, NY 11'147-21 BE
(921) 427-59E3E - PA,1, (15DI] 427-6920 r,vw.neinonpvpo.tom
_T[a ,CC'21 4 �:. 1257 P.03/05
^ • . Dtil6arn Subdivision �Greenport
• SEQRA Review Serim Proposal
EXHIBT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
t'mi 'ci Review rage
I. ['rcpare SEQRA coordi wtir n letter to involved agencies.
2 Pr,pare resolutGx: for i-oard '.o aotsume lead agency status.
prepare Uereruunaticnr 0-i Sigu fcance and resolution to adopt same.
Budget: $1.000.00
$coning Stage(optional;scoping is optional and can be initiated by either lead agency or applicant)
1. Prepare Draf3 EIS Scope for circulation to involved agencies,applicant and interested parties;or
review draft scope prepared and submitted by applicant.
1 Prepare notice for public scoping meeting and attend scoping meeting.
3. Synthesize issues identified at scoping meeting and incorporate into draft scope to issue as Final
Scope
Budget: $1,800.00
Qaft ELS Reviewase
1. R_bi %v Draft EIS submitted on behalf of applicant for content and adequacy in meeting SEQRA
requirements (SFQRA Part 617.9 (a)(2)] and conformance with Final Scope document;provide
Draft FIS review letter within approximately 30 days of receipt of Drag 91S;( 45 days allowed
under SEQRA),
2. Review resubmitted Draft EIS for conformance with initial review letter; provide Draft EIS
review tetter for torrent turd adequacy within approximately it days of receipt of revised Draft
EIS: ,'30 days ellov.,ed under SEQRA). Conduct additional revizws of revised Draft EIS
dOc UrrlentS as necessary.
3. Prepare draft Notice of Complete Draft EIS and Notice of public Hearing for consideration by the
Town
4, Cmidiic! cetai i d review of Draft EIS for uccuracy and substance in order to determine if impacts
have been addressed and analyzed thoroughly to.provide the Town and involved agencies with
information racessary for the decision-making process. Conduct independent analyses as
appropriate, complete detailed traffic study review and verify assumptions and conclusions based
on professional standards. Meer with Town to gain input regarding comments on the Draft EIS.
Provide Drafi EIS review leper for accuracy and substance (incorporating input front Town),
fdent&ing issues which should be addressed in a Final EIS, if substantive corroeprW are rated
(letter to be provided prior to the public'hearing).
5. Attend public hearing on the Draft EIS.
Ngt a
516 :12`_ 1257 P.04/05
• • NUIsa n Subdivision Nv Greenport
�1 SEQRA Review Services Proposal
Budget: S6,000.0i1
fins Rz�ie y Yaaas�
Assess comments received ai public hearing (transcript), written comrnents from Involved
agencies and parties of interest. Provide letter to Town identifying comment letters with the intent
of",;,:,ting comn;enis on the Draft LIS to tits applicant to address in a proposed Final EIS.
_. Review proposed Fins! PIS suhir.ined on behalf of applicam for accurac'�, substance and
effectiveness in responding to comments on the Draft EIS Conduct independent analyses us
appropriate and verify :, surriptions and conclusions based on professional standards. Meet with
Town to gain input regarding comrrtetits on the Filial HIS, We typically find that the applicant
prepares the Final HIS for submission to the Town for review, modification and acceptance. The
Planning Board at times requests Utat the Town consultant prepare the Final HIS. Should the
Board wish NP&V to prepare the Final EIS, we will provide a separate proposal based on the
comments received on the Draft HIS. The following product summary anticipates that the .
applicant will prepare the first cut Final HIS. Provide Final EIS review letter for accuracy and
substanCO (incotpordting input from Town), identifying issues which should be addressed in a
revised Final EIS. within approximately 21 days of receipt of proposed Find EIS.
3. Review resubmitted Final EIS for conformance with initial review letter; provide Final EIS
review letterfor content and adequacy within approximately 21 days of receipt of revised Final
EIS. Conduct additional reviews of revised Draft HIS documents as necessary.
4. Prepare draft Notice of'Complete Final EIS for consideration by Town.
Budget:54,000.00
Pindin s Phase.
1. Review EIS record and consult with Town representatives; prepare drgft Statement of Findings-
_13Cv_3a4_Stafrmeat of Findim,r ac
—1eCaaSa1y- based On review iind .
Findings and prepare resolution for adoption.
Budget:$2,200.00
tvores and Comments:
It is assumed that the Town will complete all circulation and mailing in compliance with notice
and filing requirements of SEQRA. NP&V will assist upon request with corresponding fees
ncw•red.
The budget numbers e'e for estimating par.-poses; actual fee, will be based on amount of time
expended in completion of tasks to the satisfaction of the Town, times the hourly rates presented
in Bxhlbit B.
Pose 3
515 425 1257 P.05/05
! • • Mllasxo Subdivision 0 Greenport
SEQRA Review Services Proposal
EXHIBIT B
RATE SCHEDULE
Time Rates Fee Schedule - Time rates to he applied for all activities
completed in accordance with the Scope of Services provided in
Exhibit A.
Office Principal $165.00
Associate $145.00
Senior Engineer& Surveyor $130.00
Design Engineer $115.00
Ptineipal Environmental Planner $115.00
BnvironinentalEngineer $105.00
Hydrogeologist $ 95.00
Senior Environmental Analyst $ 95,00.
Senior Environmental Scientist $ 95.00
Engineer& Survey Technician $ 95.00
Inspector $ 9000
Environmental Analyst $ 90.00
Environmental Scientist $ 85.00
Draftsman $ 80.00
Environmental Planner $ 80.00
Environmental Technician $ 75.00
Typist $ 60.00
Pup 0
TOTAL F.05
• COUNTY OF SUFFOLK •
a
ROBERT J.GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
RICHARD J.LAVALLE, P.E. CHARLES J.BARTHA,P.E. LESLIE A. MITCHEL
CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
July 25, 2002
Town of Southold
Planning Board Office D
P. O. Box 1179
Town Hall, 53095 State Rte. 25
Southold,N. Y. 11971-0959 1
Attn: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. JUL `L 8 2uuz
Chairman
Re: Minor Subdivision for John& Rose Milazzo Souftw TOM
Pipes Creek/north by the LIRR track in Greenport
SCTM#100-53-1-9
Gentlemen:
This Department has reviewed the above-referenced site plan. Specifically note that:
Since this proposed development is not adjacent to a County maintained road or a road proposed for
improvements by the County, a permit will not be required from this Department.
If you have any questions,kindly contact this office at 8524100.
Very truly yours,
William S. Shannon,P.E.
Chief Engineer
'By7::�: _
M. Paul Campagnola
Permits Engineer
WSS/MPC/VK/ln
SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
335 YAPHANK AVENUE
(631)852-4010
■ YAPHANK,N.Y. 1 1980 ■ FAX(631)852-4150
' PLANNING BOARD MEMB• Q�pOfF011r •
G P.O. Box 1179
BENN F,'rT ORLOWSKI,JR.
Chairman < Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
H
WILLIAM J. CREMERS .2 Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L. EDWARDS O .F Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax (631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
July 22, 2002
Mr. Charles Voorhis
Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC
572 Walt Whitman Road
Melville, New York 11747
Re: Review of DEIS Draft Scope for Milazzo
SCTM#1000-53-01-09
Dear Mr. Voorhis:
The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the applicants proposed Draft
Environmental Impact Statement Draft Scope to your office for review.
s we i�scussed l am—in-the process of public notice for the scoping meeting for
the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the Hog's Neck Peninsula and the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Milazzo. To confirm: the date is set for
August 15, 2002 at 3:00 p.m. The meeting is to be held at the Southold Town Hall.
The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover.
Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above.
Sincerel ,
Ma erry
nor
Environ ntal nner
Enc.
( Coastal Environmental CoFporation environmental planning&permits
42 Lewis Road weuands impact statements
East Quogue, New York 11942 waste management regulatory compliance
(631)653 3399 Fax (631)653 3451 Board Certified Environmental Professionals
e-mail jlscoast@optonline.net
July 11, 2002
Mr. Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner
Town of Southold Planning Board
P.O. Box 1170
Southold Town Hall
5309 New York State Road 25
Southold, New York 11971
RE: Town of Southold Project No. 1000-53-01-09
DEIS Draft Scope for Milazzo Cluster Subdivision
Pipes Neck Road, Greenport, NY
Dear Mr. Terry,
Coastal Environmental Corporation is providing professional environmental services for
the above referenced application. At the request of Mr. Charles Cuddy, attorney for Mr.
John Milazzo, we are pleased to provide the Lead Agency with a draft scope of issue to
be addressed in the DEIS. The scope is in response to the information provided by the
Lead Agency in support of its positive declaration based on concerns considered to hold
potential for significant impact.
Pursuant to your May 13, 2002 SEQRA determination of significance and notice of intent
for preparation of the EIS, it is stated a public scooping session will be held. Kindly
advise of the date of the hearing so that we can schedule our attendance on behalf of the
applicant. We would expect the Lead Agency to provide a final scope within 60 days of
receipt of the draft scope.
Please contact me directly if you have any additional requests or comments regarding the
draft scope.
Very ty y,#iirs,
Jeffrey 5'acernan, CEP REM
Coastal Environmental Corporation
JUL 16 2002
_.<,. tt old Tow
Planning BOard
f ' • •
f
Milazzo DEIS Proposed Draft Scope of Issues
July 10, 2002
Action: SEQRA Positive Declaration Notice dated May 13, 2002
Town of Southold Project Number 1000-53-01-09
Location: Pipes Neck Peninsula, Greenport a.k.a. SCTM # 1000-53-01-9/ Milazzo
Cluster Sketch Plan
Description: Subdivision of 12.5254 acre parcel into three (3) residential lots.
Lead Agency:Southold Town Planning Board, Southold,New York
Applicant: John Milazzo: C/o Charles R. Cuddy, Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 1547
Riverhead, New York 11901
Tel. 631-369-8200
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement shall be prepared in compliance with the New
York State Environmental Quality Review Act standards generally described in
6NYCRR Part 617.9.
• Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cover Sheet
-Title
-Name&type of action
-Location
-Lead agency information
-Preparer information
-Date of Acceptance
-Comment deadline date
• Table of Contents
-Sections and page numbers
I. Executive Summary
II. Existing Conditions/Environmental Setting
A. General Description of Action , Purpose,Need & Location
B. Topography: Slopes, site elevations with respect to Pipes Creek
C. Vegetation: General description of plants on site
D. Wildlife: Types and Habitats of Significance
E. Wetlands: Tidal & Freshwater delineations and verification by
NYSDEC/Southold
F. Water Resources: Surface, subsurface, potable water availability and service
G. Precipitation & Recharge: drainage basin description and hydrology
H. Soils: types, descriptions of characteristics, site locations
1. 'Traffic & Roadway System: local network, site access, right of ways
J. Existing Development: types and number of units
K. Community Character & Services
L. Archaeological/Cultural resources
III. Potential Significant Environmental Impacts
A. Wildlife: Impact potential on clearing within significant habitats.
B. Topography and Drainage: Assess alteration of regional drainage basin.
C. Vegetation: Clearing limits and proposed restrictions on development
D. Wetlands: Tidal and Freshwater Wetland Permitted Activities and restrictions
on clearing and development (as Special Conditions)
E. Soils: Permeability constraints
F. Groundwater& Water Supply: Increased demand/SGPA evaluation
G. Sanitary Disposal: conformance with SCDOH requirements
H. Open Space/Preserved Areas and Southold Community Preservation
Plan/Public Purchase
I. Community Character & Services
J. Visual
K. Archaeological/Cultural resources
L. Temporary Impacts
IV. Mitigating Measures
A. Vegetation: Applicability of low maintenance landscaping, native plants and
clearing limits.
B. Wildlife: Potential mitigation using clearing limits to build wildlife corridors.
C. Topography & Hydrology: Potential for vegetated filter strips and storm water
controls.
D. Wetlands: special permit conditions/avoidance of impacts
E. Soils: Potential of imported soils for improved permeability.
F. Groundwater & Water Supply: Low/non-irrigated areas.
G. Sanitary Disposal: Potential of imported soils for improved permeability and
elevation changes.
H. Open Space/Preserved Areas and Southold Community Preservation Plan,
Public Purchase
L Community Character & Services
J. Archaeological/Cultural Resources: Avoidance
K. Temporary Impacts
L. Visual Mitigation: Screening with vegetation
M. Community Services
N. Traffic
V. Adverse Environmental Effects That Cannot Be Avoided if the
Project is Implemented
VI. Growth Inducing Aspects
VI 1. Alternatives
A. Alternative Residential Subdivision Layouts & Clusters
B. Preservation and Acquisition
C. No Build
VIII. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
IX. Appendices/References
Historical files relating to the application
SEQRA record
Correspondence relative to the application
Information referenced in the EIS unless footnoted
Prepared by.-
Coastal
y:Coastal Environmental Corporation
42 Lewis Road
East Quogue, NY 11942
Jeffrey L. Seeman, CEP REM
r V
Coastal Environmental Corpollon environt al planning&permits
42 Lewis Road wetlands impact statements
East Quogue,New York 11942 waste management regulatory compliance
(631)653 3399 fax (631)653 3451 Board CerdJkdEnWroameand Professionals
e-mail jlscoast@optonline.net
July 11, 2002
Mr. Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner
Town of Southold Planning Board
P.O. Box 1170
Southold Town Hall
5309 New York State Road 25
Southold, New York 11971
RE: Town of Southold Project No. 1000-53-01-09
DEIS Draft Scope for Milazzo Cluster Subdivision
Pipes Neck Road, Greenport,NY
Dear Mr. Terry,
Coastal Environmental Corporation is providing professional environmental services for
the above referenced application. At the request of Mr. Charles Cuddy, attorney for Mr.
John Milazzo, we are pleased to provide the Lead Agency with a draft scope of issue to
be addressed in the DEIS. The scope is in response to the information provided by the
Lead Agency in support of its positive declaration based on concerns considered to hold
potential for significant impact.
Pursuant to your May 13, 2002 SEQRA determination of significance and notice of intent
for preparation of the EIS, it is stated a public scooping session will be held. Kindly
advise of the date of the hearing so that we can schedule our attendance on behalf of the
applicant. We would expect the Lead Agency to provide a final scope within 60 days of
receipt of the draft scope.
Please contact me directly if you have any additional requests or comments regarding the
draft scope.
Vgryt yY s>
Jeffrey eman CEP REM
Coastal E ' onmental Corporation
JUL 15 1002 '
Southold Town
Planning Board
Mihuzo DEIS Proposed Draft Scope of Issues
July 10,2002
Action: SEQRA Positive Declaration Notice dated May 13, 2002
Town of Southold Project Number 1000-53-01-09
Location: Pipes Neck Peninsula, Greenport a.k.a. SCTM# 1000-53-01-9/Milazzo
Cluster Sketch Plan
Description: Subdivision of 12.5254 acre parcel into three (3) residential lots.
Lead Agency:Southold Town Planning Board, Southold,New York
Applicant: John Milazzo: C/o Charles R. Cuddy, Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 1547
Riverhead,New York 11901
Tel. 631-369-8200
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement shall be prepared in compliance with the New
York State Environmental Quality Review Act standards generally described in
6NYCRR Part 617.9.
• Draft Environmental Impact Statement Cover Sheet
-Title
-Name&type of action
-Location
-Lead agency information
-Preparer information
-Date of Acceptance
-Comment deadline date
• Table of Contents
-Sections and page numbers
1. Executive Summary
U. Existing Conditions/Environmental Setting
A. General Description of Action , Purpose,Need& Location
B. Topography: Slopes, site elevations with respect to Pipes Creek
C. Vegetation: General description of plants on site
D. Wildlife: Types and Habitats of Significance
E. Wetlands: Tidal & Freshwater delineations and verification by
NYSDEC/Southold
F. Water Resources: Surface, subsurface, potable water availability and service
G. Precipitation&Recharge: drainage basin description and hydrology
H. Soils: types, descriptions of characteristics, site locations
I. Traffic & Roadway System: local network, site access, right of ways
J. Existing Development: types and number of units
K. Community Character& Services
L. Archaeological/Cultural resources
M. Potential Significant Environmental Impacts
A. Wildlife: Impact potential on clearing within significant habitats.
B. Topography and Drainage: Assess alteration of regional drainage basin.
C. Vegetation: Clearing limits and proposed restrictions on development
D. Wetlands: Tidal and Freshwater Wetland Permitted Activities and restrictions
on clearing and development (as Special Conditions)
E. Soils: Permeability constraints
F. Groundwater& Water Supply: Increased demand/SGPA evaluation
G. Sanitary Disposal: conformance with SCDOH requirements
H. Open Space/Preserved Areas and Southold Community Preservation
Plan/Public Purchase
I. Community Character& Services
J. Visual
K. Archaeological/Cultural resources
L. Temporary Impacts
IV. Mitigating Measures
A. Vegetation: Applicability of low maintenance landscaping, native plants and
clearing limits.
B. Wildlife: Potential mitigation using clearing limits to build wildlife corridors.
C. Topography& Hydrology: Potential for vegetated filter strips and storm water
controls.
D. Wetlands: special permit conditions/avoidance of impacts
E. Soils: Potential of imported soils for improved permeability.
F. Groundwater& Water Supply: Low/non-irrigated areas.
G. Sanitary Disposal: Potential of imported soils for improved permeability and
elevation changes.
H. Open Space/Preserved Areas and Southold Community Preservation Plan,
Public Purchase
I. Community Character& Services
J. Archaeological/Cultural Resources: Avoidance
K. Temporary Impacts
L. Visual Mitigation: Screening with vegetation
M. Community Services
N. Traffic
V. Adverse Environmental Effects That Cannot Be Avoided if the
Project is Implemented
VI. Growth Inducing Aspects
VII. Alternatives
A. Alternative Residential Subdivision Layouts& Clusters
B. Preservation and Acquisition
C. No Build
VIII. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources
IX. Appendices/References
Historical files relating to the application
SEQRA record
Correspondence relative to the application
Information referenced in the EIS unless footnoted
Prepared by--
Coastal
y:Coastal Environmental Corporation
42 Lewis Road
East Quogue, NY 11942
Jeffrey L. Seeman, CEP REM
� • gpFFO(,�
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS C
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. /��O OGy P.O. Box 1179
Chairman t Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
WILLIAM J. CREMERS H 2 Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L. EDWARDS O .tC Telephone (631) 765-1938
GE4@ Ir RKPC441Pr6ATHA44,JR- y Fax (631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAccIANO �Ol �a0
MARTIN SIDOR, JR.
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
July 9, 2002
Mr. Charles Cuddy
P.O. Box 1547
Riverhead, NY 11901
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for John & Rose Milazzo
Located on Pipes Creek & bordered on the north by the LIRR track in Greenport
SCTM#1000-53-1-9 Zoning District: R-80
Dear Mr. Cuddy:
The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, July 8, 2002,
adopted the following resolutions:
WHEREAS, this proposal is to subdivide a 12.54 acre parcel into 3 single family lots;
and
WHEREAS, prior to issuing any approvals for the proposed subdivision, the Planning
Board is requiring that the concept be subject to SEQRA review; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board adopted the Environmental Assessment Review Report
for Milazzo at Greenport, dated April 11, 2002, prepared by Nelson Pope and Voorhis,
LLC; and
WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the
Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review
Act, established itself as lead agency, and as lead agency has determined that the
proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment and adopted a
Positive Declaration for the proposed action; be it therefore
RESOLVED, that the Planning Board set Thursday, August 15, 2002 at 4:00 p.m. to
conduct the Scoping Session for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the
proposed Minor Subdivision of John and Rose Milazzo at the Town of Southold Town
Hall; and be it
Milazzo at Greenport — Page Two — 5/14/02
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board authorizes the secretary to the Board
to file this notice with the following parties noted below.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
FW
f%n�nR �1/TE=pW�JeC'
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor
Southold Town Board
Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney
Board of Trustees
Building Department
Southold Conservation Advisory Committee
Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Department of Public Works
NYSDEC - Stony Brook
New York State Department of Transportation
Suffolk County Water Authority
Sharon Gustafson, MTA-LIRR
John Milazzo, Applicant
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport,New York 11944
(631)477 3608
,1
SUN 1 i- 12V
MEMBERS: June 12, 2002
George&Jean Betzios Joshua Y. Horton
Darlene Capobianco supervisor
&Gina Chircop
Anthony&Jeannine Contino Town of Southold
Irene&Tom Costas P.O. Box 1179
Use&Ty costes
Tom&Jenn Costas Southold, New York 11971
K.C.Coughlin
Barbara Dai
Peds&Rich DelVecchio ,�J ✓
Christine Durkin Dear Josh,
Jennifer Durldn
Mary Ann Durkin Enclosed are some internet documents that we found after
Jean Eckardt
Edward Flynn just a cursory search. A recent United States Supreme Court
Fortunato P. &Valerie Foti decision found:
Ignatia E. Foti
Jeff Goubeaud
Dennis&Kathleen Green "moratoria are an essential tool of successful
C Doug Hardy development" "The interest in informed decision-
Betty Hintze makingcounsels against...a rule that would treat such
Henry Hintze
Al&Sue Homan interim measures as takings regardless of the
Julia&Timothy Kilcullen planners' good faith, the landowners' reasonable
Kristin Klismann
Patricia Lauth expectations, or the moratorium's actual impact on
Deborah Lindsay property values."
Lynn Mastrota
Steven alumbo o g
P
Dennis Palumbo A challenge to a moratorium would be based on lack of
Anna Pekunka good faith rather than statistical foundation.
Mike Pekunka
Aidan&Eileen O'Reilly We urge possible
Steven(Larry)Reiter ge you to enact a moratorium as soon as
Eleanor&Fred Ramps that includes both major and minor subdivisions, both pending
Rick Rempe
Angela Rich and new applications. H the moratorium were not to include
William Russack minor subdivisions, it would virtually exclude our valuable
Brian&Maryanne Russell waterfront
Eric Sweeting
Furthermore, we urge a moratorium of significant duration
to allow proper policy development. We believe a 24 month
moratorium would be necessary. A moratorium may be lifted
earlier if a policy is prepared in less than 24 months. That procedure would be far
less onerous and less open to legal challenge than extending a short-duration
moratorium later.
This will be a bold move by the Town, but it is obviously necessary.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
CC: Southold Town Board
Southold Trustees
Southold Town Attorney
Southold Planning Board
Southold Land Preservation Office
Suffolk Times
Traveler Watchman
Supreme Court Decision Limits Vnition of Land"Taking"; Property O W
Not Due ... Page I of 1
Supreme Court Decision Limits D!efinitilm of Land"Taking^; Property Owners.Not-Due Compensation for I
Moratorium
After years of split decisions for property rights claimants against land-use agencies, the U.S. Supreme Cc
momentum in Tahoe-Sierra Preservation versus Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, ruling 6-3 that 400 area Ian
due multi-million dollar compensation for a 32-month development moratorium by the joint Califomia-Nevada
agency between 1981 and 1984, although the temporary moratorium — extended by a court and then made
regulation — prevented them from building homes near the famous lake, already degraded by sprawl4nduc
landowners supported by a friend of the court brief from the Nevada Farm Bureau and with the agency bad
administration and a brief from the Washington-based nonprofit Community Rights Counsel (CRC), acting
governors, mayors and other state and local officials,the Supreme Court rejected the notion that a prolonged mor.
land use and search for its long-term protection, automatically represents a "taking,"which requires just compen
Fifth Amendment's safeguards for property rights. Witten by Justice John Paul Stevens,joined by Justices Sandr.
Anthony M. Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer, the ruling, writes Linda Gr
New York Times, "must have been a particularly bitter defeat"for Justice Antonin Scalia, who signed dissents
William H. Rehnquist and Justice Clarence Thomas. The writer explains that the majority limited Justice Scalia's 1 i
versus South Carolina Coastal Council decision — which extended the entitlement for compensation from props
"categorical taking" to property use restrictions or a "regulatory taking" — by narrowing its application to this"extr
The majority also undercut his extreme pro-landowner stance in a Palaaolo versus Rhode Island case — retw
state courts for reconsideration — by siding with Justice O'Connorps cautionary opinion that should the court rul
notwithstanding the property restrictions at the time of purchase, It should guard against a"windfall"award. In the
Justice Stevens wrote, "land-use regulations are ubiquitous and most of them impact property values in some t
often in completely unanticipated ways. Treating them all as per se takings would transform government regulatit
few governments could afford." CRC chief counsel Timothy Dowling called the ruling "a thoroughgoing rebuP
notions of property rights advanced by developers and other special interests" and "the best news from the Sc.
takings law in more than 20 years." Writing in the Cas Vegas Review-Journal, Christine Dorsey of the Steph
Bureau quotes plaintiffs'attorney Michael Berger,who said Justices Anthony Kennedy and Sandra Day O'Connor
votes," seeming sympathetic to the landowners, but uncomfortable with placing financial strain on regional plannir
Tahoe agency's attorney, E. Clement Shute, said, "The threat of having to pay damages to 400 landowners has!
saves a lot of money." Nevertheless, the Las Vegas daily groans in an editorial that "land-grabbing environme
jumping for joy' and expresses its hope that landowners could "prevail in another lawsuit," challenging the more
were written, but as they were applied. 4124/2002
http://www.smartgrowth.org/news/article.asp?art=2623&State=52&res=800 6/10/02
Development Moratorium Prop* • Page 1 of 1
r
Other New York State cases indicate that municipalities may declare moratoriums upon land
development where such an act is a valid stop-gap measure reasonably designed to temporarily hal
development while the municipality addresses some legitimate public concern ice,comprehensive
planning or zoning changes,etc. The key to validity is whether the moratorium is for a reasonable
purpose and a reasonable period of time. Courts look at both the scope of the overall prohibition(
total ban vs.partial ban)and the duration(i.e. reasonable to address the public concerns -Sm CeM
Telephone Company v Village of Terrytown, 209 A.D.2d 57,66,624 N.Y.S.2d 170, 176(1995)
(upholding three-month cellular anteana moratorium to permit development of new reguhMionsy,
Development Associates v VdIage Irviagfon, 171 A.D.2d 656,657,566 N.Y.S.2d 954,955(1991)
(upholding"temporary building moratorium"of undetermined length to permit consideration of
comprehensive zoning changes.);Noghrey v Acampora, 152 A.D.2d 660,660-61,543 N.Y.S.2d,530
531 (1989)(upholding six-month development moratorium to permit consideration of comprehensi
zoning changes.);DuneAssocrates,Inc v.Anderson, 119 A.D.2d 574,575,500 N.Y.S.2d,741,742-4
(19%)(upholding 90-day moratorium while town considered comprehensive zoo mg changes);New
York Housing Authority r. Deparbuent of Env&onmentW ConsenvWon,83 Misc.2d 89,94,372 N.Y.
2d, 146, 151 (1975)(upholding two-year moratorium on development in tidal flats to permit the Ste
of New York to complete its inventory of tidal wetiauds). By contrast,courts have not hesitated to
strike down moratoriums which they found were not reasonable in scope or duration or where the
enacting municipality had failed to act diligently to address the public concern motivating the
moratorium.See Machell v Kemp, 176 A.D.2d,859,860,575 N.Y.S.2d 337,339(1991)(striking da
a series of moratoriums enacted over five years where the enacting municipality failed to enact a
zoning ordinance);Lakeview Apartments v. Town of Stanford,A.D.2d 914,485,N.Y.S.2d 801 (1985)
(striking down a series of moratoriums re-enacted over seven years where a municipality failed to
enact zoning ordinances Duke v Town of Hunfingon, 153 Mise 2d 521,524,581 N.V.S.2d 978,90
(1991)(striking down a series of bans on dock construction enacted over two years where the town
had been planning to develop a"local waterfront revitalization plan"for over seven years but had
to adopt it).
http://www.freislandassn.orgBudding_MoratDrium_5 2000.htm 6/10/02
East Hampton Star-In the N• • Page 1 of 3
i
THE STAR
last Hanipian.N.Y. Shims for All Online May L mol
Top Court Curbs Developers
By Susan Rosenbaum
The United States Supreme Court Landed down a rating last week that could affect
land-use planning in East Hampton. Its subject:development around Lake Tahoe,
Nev.,a place whose"unsurpassed beauty," wrote Justice John Paul Stevens in the
majority opinion,"is the wellspring of its undoing."
In a 6-to-3 setback to property-rights advocates,the court ruled that a government-
imposed moratorium,even one that goes on for several years,does not necessarily
amount to a"taking" of private property.Had the decision gone the other way,
taxpayers would have been required to compensate the landowners,under the
Constitution's Fifth Amendment,for their losses.
A regional planning agency of officials from California and Nevada,which share the
Lake Taboe shoreline,imposed a 32-moutb4bug Tahoe moratorium in 1981 while it
developed a land-ase plan to protect the lake.(Mark Twain,the justices noted,
described the lake's distinctive quality in 1872 as "not merely transparent,but
damlingly,brilliantly so.")
More than 400 landowners banded together to bring the case.Barred from building
houses on the take,they claimed they were deprived of the economically viable use of
their property and therefore were owed something.
But "moratoria are an essential tool of successful development," the court found.
"The interest in informed decisiou-making counsels agssaat...a rule that would treat
such interim measures as takings regardless of the planners'good faith,the
landowners' reasonable expectations,or the moratorium's actual impact on property
values.••
The ruling also added weight to zoning laws, reaffirming what in legal circles is called
the"parcel as a whole" rule.The justices wrote thats,moratorium is"conceptually so
different than a fend-ase restriction that permanently denies all use on a discrete
portion of property" -wetlands setbacks,for instance- "or that permanently restricts
s type of use serosa all of the parcel," such as conducting a business on a residential
lot.
East Hampton Town,in the process of updating its comprehensive plan for reasons
not unlike those in the Lake Tahoe Basis,has three moratoriums now in effect.The
town board is expected to approve a fourth this welly and fast week a group of citizens
asked the board to impose yet a fifth.
Three of the moratoriums could last more than two years-one,nearly three-while
http://www.easthamptDnstar.com/20020502/news3.htm 6/10/02
East Hampton Star-In the News• • Page 2 of 3
the others,in the North Main Street area and,if approved,the Stephen Hand's Path
"corridor;" probably would restrict building for about six mouths while neighborhood
studies are conducted. The three major moratoriums cover development of
subdivisions of 10 acres or more,fust imposed in dune 2000,and development of
commensal property along Montauk Highway and site plans is water recharge areas,
both first enacted in September 2000
To date,no legal challenges to the restrictions have been brought here,Eric Bregman,
the town attorney,said on Friday."I don't think even three years would run afoul" of
the Supreme Court decision,be added,because of the context He pointed to the many
townspeople who have called the revision of East Hampton's comprehensive plan the
commnsity's"last shot,•'saying,"We should do it sight."
It would consequently be bard to imagine"that the balance would come down"on the
side of compensating landowners,the attorney said.
Mr.Bregman's eyes lit up during an interview at his office at the prospect of delving
into the Supreme Court decision's details."Takings"take two forms-physical and
regulatory,he explained,offering a vivid example of the first: "My grandparents
couldn't complain when the Cossacks tools their horse."
In the United States,condemnation is the obvious form of a physical taking.But
government must pay"no matter how small"a physical taking,Mr.Bregmas said.
The lawyer,who keeps an apartment in a Manhattan building that he himself owns,
cited a 40-year-old law that enabled cable companies to install distribution boxes on
New York City buildings.The cable company must pay for the space it uses on his
building,ccordi og to a court ruling-a "compensation"Mr.Bregman now enjoys in
the form of free cable service.
As to regulatory takings,the issue in the Taboe case,the landowner qualirm for
com pewation only if the government takes all,or essentially all,of the economic value
of the property,the Supreme Court affirmed.
About 60 years ago,the court ruled in Causley v United States that the federal
government owed a chicken farmer damages after its pilots flew planes so low over his
farm that the racket kept the hens from laying eggs,thereby depriving him of income.
The court found that action to be a "partial takings"in which a substantial amount of
the economic value of the property had been affected.
On the other hand,the justices said the Lucas case of a decade ago did not apply to the
Taboe case.In Lucas Y.South Carolina Coastal Council,the Court found in favor of
the landowner who had bought two buildable lots along the coast Two years after the
purchase,the government prohibited building on barrier beaches,thereby stripping
the property ofsts value.That,the Court found,was a regulatory taking,and the
property owner was owed fair value,as determined at the time of the taking.
In addition,they noted,no government could afford the luxury of paying if all
temporary regulatory restrictions-time required for site plan hearings,zoning
decisions,even obtaining permits-were to be treated as per se takings.
http://www.easthamptonstar_com/20020502/news3.htm 6/10/02
East Hampton Star- In the News• • Page 3 of 3
Last week's decision upheld a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit in San Francisco.Finding with Justice Stevens were Justices Sandra Day
O'Connor,Anthony 11L Kennedy,David$Souter,Ruth Bader Ginsburg,and
Stephen G. Breyer.
Along with Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas,Chief Justice William 13.
Rehnquist dissented,calling"tenons" the distinction between temporary and
permanent building restrictions,and saying the rationale for the Lucas case did apply.
The full Supreme Court decision and the dissenting opinions can be found on the
Internet at- www.lawsfmdlaw.com/ns/000/WI167.htm1
Home I Index I News I Arts I Food I Outdoors I ColumnsI Editorials I LettersI Real EstateI Events/Movies I Classifieds
Archives
http://www.casthamptonstar.com/20020502/news3.htm 6/10/02
-1/2 0,H2 CHAPLES P CUED', PAGE 0'_!01
June 3, 2002
VIA
Mark Terry
Planning Board
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Mililzso 4%bdiyision
Pipes Beck load, Greenport, NY 11944
Dear Mr. Terry:
Please advise when you anticipate that the scoping
session will be held in connection with the Environmental
Impact Statement for the subject parcel.
Charles R. Cuddy
CRC:cg
v 4W
JJt� 1 ilij?
Ahold Toa ,1
NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL,PLANNING, CONSULTING
(631)427-5665 572 Walt Whitman Road
FAX(631)427.5620 Melville,NY 11747
TO: Mark Terry Date: 1-Jul-02
Town of Southold
Planning Board Office,Town Hall Re: Milazzo,Pipes Creek
53095 Main Road
Southold,NY 1 t971-0959 Job No. NP&V#01220
Weare sending you L^J Under separate cover
X Herewith
Pick Up By Messenger
For Your Review&Comment
Approval
As requested
X For your use
Bid Submission
uanti Drawing Title Sheet No. Date
1 NYS PPRHP Correspondence
Remarks:
Mark,
For your files,attached please find recent correspondence from the NYS OPRHP in regard JUL 0 2LuuL
to the above referenced project. Please feel free to call should you have any questions.
Southold Town
Planning Board
Very truly yours,
NELSON,POPE&VOORHIS,LLC
By: Shang Lacey
a tr'j
$ New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau
O NEW YOW STATE Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New YorK 12188-0189 518-237-8643
eernaoette Castro
Commissioner
June 25, 2002
Timothy Cooke
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Division of Environmental Permits
4" Floor
625 Broadway
Albany, NY 12233-1750
Dear Mr. Cooke:
Re: DEC # 1-4738-02483/00001
Milazzo Family Limited Liability Corporation
Proposed Subdivision, Pipes Creek Road
Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY
OOPR01135/02PR01918
Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks, Recreation and
Historic Preservation (OPRHP) with regard to the potential for this project to affect significant
historical/cultural resources. OPRHP has reviewed your letter of June 18, 2002 regarding the
concerns of local citizens regarding this project. Based on this letter we have reviewed our files
and offer the following comments.
1. OPRHP initially received an information request regarding this property in March
2000. At that time the project was assigned number OO12111135. Under that project
number our office received additional information including a Phase 1 archaeological
report completed by Tracker Archaeology Services in August 2001. We responded
that based on the information in the report, we did not believe that this project
would have an impact on historic properties. This response was sent on October 15,
2001.
2. In April 2002, our office received a letter from the consulting firm of Nelson, Pope
and Voorhis on behalf of the Town of Southold asking if a property had any
archaeological sensitivity. Since the previous Project Review number was not
referenced our staff did not realize that this was project we had already seen, and
therefore it was assigned a new number 02PR01918. A search of our database
indicated that this area was considered sensitive for archaeology and we sent a letter
indicating this.
3. Your current letter includes copies of documents that were reportedly "prepared by
the Division for Historic Preservation, New York State Office of Parks and
Recreation". This statement is incorrect. Although our forms may have been
utilized, this information appears to have actually been prepared by the Town of
Southold and SPLIA (Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities). n
VF=ED (I
JUIN d LuuL
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency
t9 pnntetl on recycletl Oaoer
4. The work completed by Tracker Archaeology Services examined the existing records
in our files prepared a sensitivity assessment of the property and included a field
testing program at the property. The sensitivity assessment identified that there
were many historic and prehistoric sites in the vicinity and determined that the
project area had a high sensitivity for archaeological deposits. Therefore Phase 1B
testing was recommended for any areas where ground disturbance would occur.
5. This testing was carried out within areas of proposed ground disturbance as
identified by information provided to the archaeologists. This testing identified a
total 5 quartz flakes. Given the distribution of these Flakes and the extremely low
density of material, it was determined that there were no significant archaeological
deposits mthin the area to be impacted. The Conclusions and recommendations of
the report indicated that if the proposed construction plans changed, there would
need to be additional field testing in areas not covered by this work. OPRHP concurs
with this assessment and should any construction work, landscaping or other ground
disturbing activities be proposed for areas outside of those previously tested, we
would recommend additional Phase 1B testing (see attached map).
6. A copy of this report should be available to the public as part of the EIS process
(with any maps identifying the exact locations of archaeological sites removed - this
information is confidential and not available to the public). Any concerned citizens
should be able to review this report and make comments as part of the EIS process.
7. If anyone has concerns or additional information that was not included in the
archaeologist's report, they should submit those concerns in writing to you and our
office. If we receive any information that changes our opinion of this project's
potential to impact significant resources we consult with you. We have reviewed the
information in the current submission, and while it indicates that the general area
has potential, it does not appear that any of the properties indicated fall within the
impact area of the current project. If additional information indicating otherwise is
available, OPRHP will be happy to review the material.
Please contact me at extension 3291 if you have any questions regarding these
comments.
ely,
P qG
Douglas P. a ey
Historic Pres tion Program Anst
Archaeology
Att: 1 -Test Location Map
Cc: Alf ed Cammisa, Tracker Archaeology Services
�, ana Lacey, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis
:\` Lot 3
1 j �
y
Lot 2
S;p
PP�J
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek IA 41
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport,New York 11964
(631)477 3606
MEMBERS: June 10, 2002
George&Jean Betzios Mark Terry
Darlene Capobianco planning Department
Frank&Gina Chircop
Anthony&Jeannine Contino Town of Southold
Irene&Tom Costas P.O. BOX 1179
Lisa&Ty Costas
Tom&Jenn Costas Southold, New York 11971
K.C. Coughlin
Barbara Dai Reference: District 1000 Section 53 Block 1 Lot 9
Pedra&Rich DelVecchio
Christine Durkin Milazzo subdivision
Jennifer Durkin
Mary Ann Durkin
Jean Eckardt Mr.
Edward Flynn Terry,
Fortunato P. &Valerie Foti
Ignatia E. Foti The Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek eagerly awaits a
Jeff Goubeaud
Dennis& Kathleen Green scoping session on the above cited project so we may submit our
C Doug Hardy comments and questions.
Betty Hintze
Henry Hintze
All&Sue Homan However, prior to any scoping session, we request the
Julia&Timothy Kik:ullen Town require the developer to submit more accurate and detailed
Kristinaunn
PatPatriciaLLauth plans that include all wetlands and streams, all dimensions
Deborah Lindsay (including building envelopes, lots, and wetlands), structures and
Lynn Mastrota cesspools on lots 1 and 2, docks, cleared areas, fill areas, etc.
Steven a
Palumbo
The details we request will make our comments for the scoping
Dennis Palum
Anna Pekunka session more complete and we believe the details are necessary
Mike Pekunka for informed public comment
Aidan&Eileen O'Reilly
Steven(Larry) Reiter
Eleanor&Fred Rempe Thank you for your consideration of our request.
Rick Rempe
Angela Rich !'`IR
William Russack
Brian&Maryanne Russell Sincerely, +' . .?
Eric Sweeting cif)
The Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek 1 uC BL'
aWN
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK M r
P
ROBERT J.GAFFNEY
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS May 29, 2002 CHARLES J.BARTHA,P.E.
COMMISSIONER
Town of Southold
Planning Board Office
P. O. Box 1179
53095 State Route 25
Southold,N. Y. 11971-0959
Gentlemen:
Re: Pipes Creek&LIRR Track, Greenport
S.C.T.M.#1000-53-1-9
Subdivison for John &Rose Milazzo
This Department has reviewed the above-referenced site plan. Specifically note that:
Since this proposed development is not adjacent to a County maintained road or a road proposed
for improvements by the County, a permit will not be required from this Department.
If you have any questions,kindly contact this office at 852-4100.
Very truly yours,
William S. Shannon,P.E.
Chief Engineer
By:
M. Paul Campagnola
Permits Engineer
WSS/MPC/VK/In
psuoseuluueld
uM 0010u1noS
V
SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
(631)852-4010
335 YAPHANK AVENUE 0 YAPHANK,N.Y. 1 1980 ■ FAX(631)852-4150
p^ - - .�b99133u CFS RHES R CUDDY FAG; 1lB1
• • B r-
CHARLES R.CUDDY
ATTORNEY AT LAX
446GR.lFF1NG AVENUE
RIVERHSAD,NEW YORK
III-live Addx y,; TEL: (631)36 SWO
n^.Hcx 7.oS7 FAIL: (631)369-9080
Riverhead.NY 11901 '.. E-sail: emuddy earl lu .n.et
May 23, 2002
XXA FAB: 765-9],3fi I�
Mark Terry
Planning Board
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold, NY 11471,
Re: MilAsao Subdivision
Pipes Nack Road, Greenport, NY 11940
Dear Mr. Terry:
Please advise when you anticipate that the scoping
session will be held in connection with the Environmental
Impact Statement for the subject parcel.
Charles R. Cuddy
CRC:Cg
PLANNING BOARD MEMBEK3 •
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. P.O. Box 1179
Chairman ��� CQ Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
WILLIAM J. CREMERS =� Gy� Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDS O - Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. W Fax (631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO
poi � Sao
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May 14, 2002
Mr. Charles Cuddy
PO Box 1547
Riverhead, NY 11792
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for John & Rose Milazzo
Located on Pipes Creek & bordered on the north by the LIRR track in Greenport
SCTM#1000-53-1-9 Zoning District: R-80
Dear Mr. Cuddy:
The Southold Town Planning Board, at a meeting held on Monday, March 13, 2002,
adopted the following resolutions.
WHEREAS, this proposal is to subdivide a 12.54 acre parcel into 3 single family lots;
and
WHEREAS, prior to issuing any approvals for the proposed subdivision, the Planning
Board is requiring that the concept be subject to SEQRA review; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board adopts the Environmental Assessment Review Report
for Milazzo at Greenport, dated April 11, 2002; prepared by Nelson Pope and Voorhis,
LLC; therefore
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article
8 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality
Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency has determined that
the proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment and adopts a
Positive Declaration for the proposed action.
Milazzo at Greenport— Page Two — 5/14/02
Enclosed please find a copy of the Positive Declaration for your records. Please
contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Ve truly yours,
nett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
Enc.
cc: Joshua T. Horton, Supervisor
Southold Town Board
Greg Yakaboski, Town Attorney
Board of Trustees
Building Department
Southold Conservation Advisory Committee
Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Department of Public Works
NYSDEC - Stony Brook
New York State Department of Transportation
Suffolk County Water Authority
Sharon Gustafson, MTA-LIRR
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS •
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. C P.O. Box 1179
Chairman �� QG Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
WILLIAM J. CREMERS �� �� Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDS O - Telephone(631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. W Fax (631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
14-12-8(3/99)-9c SEQR
State Environmental Quality Review
POSITIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS
Determination of Significance
Project Number Date: 1000-53-01-09 Date: May 13, 2002
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State
Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law.
The Town of Southold Planning Board as lead agency,has determined that the proposed action
described below may have a significant impact on the environment and that a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared.
Name of Action:
Minor Subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo
SEQR Status: Type 1
Unlisted X
Scoping: No Yes X If yes, indicate how scoping will be conducted:
Public scoping sessions will be conducted at the Town of Southold Town Hall located at P.O.
Box 1179, 53095 State Road 25, Southold,New York
Description of Action:
The proposed action is to subdivide a 12.54 acre parcel into 3 single family residential lots. The
site consists of woodlands and extensive freshwater and marine wetlands.
Location:
The site is located on the Pipes Neck peninsula in Greenport. The parcel is located on the north
side of Pipes Neck Road, the southern and eastern property boundary abuts Pipes Creek. A
location map is enclosed.
SEAR Positive Declaration Page 2
Reasons Supporting This Determination:
This proposed action may cause a significant adverse impact on the local environment. A
comprehensive cultural, environmental and infrastructure review must be conducted to determine
the impacts to the parcel, the Moore's Drain/Pipes Creek Watershed, the community and the
Pipes Neck peninsula.
Relevant areas of environmental concern include:
(1) The inaccurate representation and/or omission of regulated wetland areas on
the maps submitted to governmental agencies.
(2) The impacts to and potential loss of quality wildlife habitat, species and
valuable wildlife corridors.
(3) The impact on existing drainage infrastructures and Moore's Drain/Pipes
Creek Watershed.
(4) The potential impacts to potential endangered, threatened and special concern wildlife
species that may occur on or near the site.
(5) The loss of native vegetation cover including valuable woodlands.
(6) The potential loss of archeological/cultural resources.
(7) Impact on aesthetic resources.
(8) Impact on open space.
(9) The impact of sanitary systems on groundwater.
(10)The impact of increased water demand upon the existing water supply
infrastructure.
(11) The indirect and direct impacts of all of the above to the adjacent Critical
Environmental Area, Pipes Creek.
(12) The assessment of a no action alternative.
A detailed narrative outlining these concerns is attached.
For Further Information:
Contact Person: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner
Address: P.O. Box 1179, 5309 State Road 25, Southold, New York 11971
Telephone Number: 631-765-1938 extension 243
SEOR Positive Declaration Pee 3
A copy of this notice must be sent to:
Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany,New York 12233-1750
Chief Executive Officer, Town/CityNillage of
Any person requesting a copy
All Involved agencies
Applicant (If any)
Environmental Notice Bulletin, Room 538, 50 Wolf Road, Albany,NY 12233-1750
P8
�s
NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL,PLANNING, CONSULTING
(631)427-5665 572 Walt Whitman Road
FAX(631)427-5620 Melville,NY 11747
TO: Mark Terry Date: 11-Apr-02
Town of Southold
Planning Board Office,Town Hall Re: Milazzo,Greenport
53095 Main Road SCTM#1000-53-01-09
Southold,NY 11971-0959 Job No. NP&V#1220
We are sending you Under separate cover
X Herewith
Pick Up By Messenger
For Your Review& Comment
Approval
X As requested
X For your use
Bid Submission
Quantity Drawing Title Sheet No. Date
1 Environmental Assessment Review
1 Revised EAF Part I
Remarks:
+ ,
Please feel free to call should you have any questions or require any additional information.
� 4
APR 15 2002
Southold Town
Very truly yours, Planning Board
NELSON,POPE&VOORHIS,LLC
By: Shana Lacey
` • • Milazzo @ Greenport
EAF Part I Review
NP&V#01220
i
IIL,
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW
ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
MILAZZO @ GREENPORT
Prepared for: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner
Town of Southold
Planning Board Office,Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold,New York 11971-0959
Prepared by: Nelson,Pope &Voorhis, LLC
572 Walt Whitman Road
Melville, New York 11747
Date: April 11, 2002
The Town of Southold Planning Board has retained Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) for
consulting services in review of the above referenced application. The proposed action involves
the subdivision of a 12.5254 acre parcel into 3 residential lots with the following lot sizes: Lot
1=1.2746 acres, Lot 2=1.5122 acres, and Lot 3=9.7386 acres. The site is vacant undeveloped
woodland containing extensive freshwater and tidal wetland habitats. This document analyzes
the site and area resources including topography, soils, water, land use, zoning, transportation
and other available information. The site has also been inspected for environmental/planning
constraints. In addition, the full EAF Part I submitted with the application has been corrected
and is attached herein.
Location and Site Overview
The subject property is located on the north side of Pipes Neck Road in Greenport, Town of
Southold, County of Suffolk. The subject property can be more particularly described as SCTM
number 1000-53-01-09. The site maintains approximately 51.66 feet of frontage on Pipes Neck
Road, with the majority of the southern and eastern property boundaries fronting on Pipes Creek.
The Long Island Railroad right-of-way abuts the northwestern perimeter of the site. The site is
vacant undeveloped woodland containing extensive freshwater and tidal wetland habitats.
Page 1
2
• Milazzo @ Greenport
EAF Part I Review
NP&V#01220
Additional freshwater and tidal wetland habitats are located off-site to the north, east and south
of the subject property. The freshwater wetlands on site can be more particularly described as
NYSDEC designated freshwater wetland SO-15, which extends off site to the north, north of the
Long Island Railroad, as well as west of the site on the west side of Pipes Creek Road. A culvert
extends under the railroad forming a wetland depression and drainage channel which extends
through the central portion of the site to the tidal wetland habitats. Tidal wetlands associated
with Pipes Creek are located in the central portion of the site and along the northeastern and
southern property boundaries. A dirt road extends from Pipes Neck Road along the southern
perimeter of the site providing access to two out-parcels located between the southerly
extensions of the site and Pipes Creek. Additionally, small trails and drainage trenches are found
throughout the property, with numerous drainage channels located in the southwest portion of the
site.
The site may contain historically and archaeological significant resources, as it is depicted on the
NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (NYS OPRHP) Circles and Squares
Map as being located within an area containing multiple site sensitivity. It is recommended that
input from the NYS OPRHP be obtained to determine impacts with regard to cultural resources.
This review will discuss the proposed project and its potential impact on the land resources.
Proposed Project
The proposed action involves the subdivision of a 12.5254 acre parcel into 3 residential lots with
the following lot sizes: Lot 1 = 1.2746 acres, Lot 2 = 1.5122 acres, and Lot 3 = 9.7386 acres.
Lots 1 and 2 are located in the southeastern corner of the site, both with frontage on Pipes Creek,
with the remainder of the parcel consisting of Lot 3. The site apparently maintains an existing 50
foot right of way along the length of the southern periphery of the site, with the proposed site
access consisting of a 16 foot wide stone blend paved roadway generally located within the same
footprint as the existing dirt road. The proposed roadway will extend through the center of Lots
1 and 2, with the building footprints on each lot located on both the sides of the access drive. A
private drive approximately 400 feet in length will provide access to the structures proposed
within Lot 3 as depicted on the Cluster Sketch Plan. As the right of way is currently in place, it
is anticipated that access easements to Tax Lots 12, 15 & 16 will remain in perpetuity.
Additionally, clarification as to the ownership and legal easements of this right of way should be
provided.
The Cluster Sketch Plan depicts several "hatched" areas on the plan which indicate the limit of
clearing. Correspondence from Jeffery Seaman of Coastal Environmental Corporation (dated
February 28, 2002) indicates that the limit of clearing and ground disturbance has been
delineated on the subdivision map and the hatched lined areas on the map indicate preserved
open space areas. As these "preserved areas" are part of the proposed lots and remote from
areas enforceable by Town personnel, it may be difficult to maintain these areas as natural and
the Planning Board may want to consider the majority of the proposed vegetative buffer areas as
dedicated passive open space provided access, public purpose, and maintenance ability is
demonstrated and the Town wishes to receive these lands. At a minimum, strict covenants and
restrictions should be filed.
NELSON, POPE G VOORHIS, LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING
Page 2
• Milazzo @ Greenport
EAF Part I Review
NP&V#01220
The project will utilize sanitary systems within the individual lots and also proposes to connect
to public water, however SCWA has indicated that water availability cannot be guaranteed at this
time. As SCWA cannot guarantee the supply of public water, any approval should be subject to
connection to public water approvable by Suffolk County Department of Health Services
(SCHDS) under Article 4 of the Sanitary Code must be obtained.
To date, the Planning Board has not accepted the yield map nor has the Planning Board granted
sketch plan approval on the proposed cluster sketch plan. The applicant proposes the 3 lot
subdivision under a cluster design. Typically, cluster subdivisions are granted in order to
preserve open space and/or environmentally sensitive features on the site in perpetuity. With the
exception of the "limit of clearing" as depicted on the plan, the entire parcel will be allocated
into individual lots and no portion of the site will be preserved in common or public ownership
as open space. As mentioned above, the Planning Board may want to consider the proposed
vegetative buffer areas as dedicated open space. Additionally, the Planning Board may wish to
review a sketch plan that is more typically of a cluster design, with reduced lot sizes and
dimensional requirements in order to preserve the sensitive environmental features on site to the
maximum extent practicable. The following provides a brief description and recommendations
concerning the development of each lot.
Lot 1
The limit of clearing grading and ground disturbance within the northern portion of Lot 1 is
located approximately 75 feet from the freshwater wetland to the north, northwest. The
Cluster Sketch Plan states that the building envelope north of the access drive will maintain a
100 foot setback from the freshwater wetland however the building envelope extends well
within 100 feet of this wetland. Further, a portion of the building envelope is located within
the "preserved area". A 25 foot front yard setback and 25 foot and 15 foot side yard setbacks
are proposed. The building envelope on the south side of the access drive in Lot 1 maintains
a 75 foot setback from an unidentified line (presumably the tidal wetland boundary
associated with Pipes Creek) and a 4 foot wide cleared access path to Pipes Creek is provided
in the southern portion of this lot.
It is recommended that the plan be revised to delineate the correct location of the 100 foot
setback line representing the eastern perimeter of the building envelope, to remove that
portion of the building envelope which is located within the "preserved area", and to identify
the limit of tidal wetlands along the lots frontage of Pipes Creek. Additionally, the Planning
Board should also clarify and restrict the two isolated building envelopes within both Lot I
and Lot 2.
Lot 2
The limit of clearing, grading and ground disturbance within the northern portion of Lot 2 as
depicted on the Cluster Sketch Plan is located approximately 70 feet from the freshwater
wetland boundary and approximately 50 from the tidal wetland boundary. The Cluster
Sketch Plan states that the building envelope north of the access drive will maintain a 100
foot setback from the tidal wetland boundary however the building envelope extends within
NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS.LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING • CONSULTING
Page 3
• • Milazzo @ Greenport
EAF Part I Review
NP&V#01220
100 feet of the tidal wetland boundary. The building envelope maintains only a 70 foot
setback from the freshwater wetland boundary. Based on a recent site inspection, it appears
as if the freshwater wetland boundary extends closer to the building envelope than depicted
on the Cluster Sketch Plan, thereby reducing this setback by approximately 30-35 feet. A 75
foot setback line from the tidal wetland boundary is depicted on the Cluster Sketch Plan
although the reasoning for which is undetermined, particularly as the 75 foot setback line is
located well beyond the building envelope. Similar to Lot 1, the building envelope on the
south side of the access drive in Lot 2 maintains a 75 foot setback from an unidentified line
(presumably the tidal wetland boundary associated with Pipes Creek) and a 4 foot wide
cleared access path to Pipes Creek is provided in the southern portion of this lot. This
portion of the lot current consists of open lawn, and setback stakes found in the field were
located between roughly 5 and 10 feet from the tidal wetland boundary (however these stakes
may have been left in the field representing prior subdivision plans).
It is recommended that the Town Trustees verify the wetland boundaries on site. The
Planning Board may wish to consider a building envelope within this lot that maintains a
100 foot setback from the freshwater wetland boundary as well as the tidal wetland
boundary, with the limits of clearing, grading and ground disturbance located no closer than
75 feet from either wetland, as well as if the building envelope within the northern portion of
the lot is feasible. It is further recommended that the Cluster Sketch Plan be revised to
delineate the correct location of the 100 foot setback line representing the eastern perimeter
of the building envelope and to identify the limit of tidal wetlands along the lots frontage of
Pipes Creek. Further, the Planning Board may wish to consider natural revegetation of the
75 foot "preserved area" within the southern portion of this lot.
Lot 3
A two story structure, patio, pool, studio and sanitary system and driveway are depicted
within Lot 3. As previously mentioned, access to this lot is provided via a private drive
approximately 400 feet in length and 10 feet in width. The nature of the surface of the
proposed driveway is unknown. The proposed driveway is located immediately adjacent to
one freshwater wetland and within approximately 25 feet of the remaining freshwater
wetland in the southern portion of this lot and within approximately 40 feet of the off-site
freshwater wetland in the western portion of the property. Field inspections of this portion of
the property revealed several additional ponded depressions as well as vegetated wetlands
within the areas proposed for development. This lot contains numerous drainage channels
between the freshwater wetland and tidal wetland habitats. These features are not depicted
on the Cluster Sketch Plan. Construction of the driveway within this lot may cause
inadvertent filling within a freshwater wetland and provides virtually no upland buffering
vegetation to remain adjacent to this mapped feature. An additional unmapped wetland
depression was observed on site adjacent to tax lot 11, which would also likely be impacted
by the proposed driveway.
The site inspection revealed the presence of an additional freshwater wetland located just
north of the proposed studio. A culvert connects this feature to the off-site wetland to the
north, which flows through a drainage channel through Lot 3 emptying into the tidal
i
s
NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS. LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING
Page 4
• Milazzo @ Greenport
EAF Part I Review
NP&V#01220
wetlands on site. A portion of this drainageway is located within the area proposed for
disturbance; additionally, the sanitary system does maintain a 100 foot setback from this
wetland feature. Further, it appears unlikely that the construction of a swimming pool and
studio can occur within a couple feet of the limit of clearing, grading and ground disturbance.
It is recommended that the Planning Board request the following information for
clarification andlor to be added to the Cluster Sketch Plan in order to determine the
environmental impact associated with development on this lot:
• The Cluster Sketch Plan should indicate whether all of the wetland boundaries indicated on
the plan have been verified by the NYSDEC Bureau of Habitat Protection.
• It is recommended that the Town Trustees verify the wetland boundaries on site.
• The additional freshwater wetlands, culvert, and drainage channel located just north of the
proposed studio should be surveyed in the field and included on the subdivision plan. The
remaining drainageways and bridge to the south, southeast of the pool should also be located
for inclusion on the plan.
• The minimum setback distances between the Limit of Clearing and Ground Disturbance and
the wetland should be provided in all appropriate locations.
• The nature of the proposed driveway surface should be indicated and a cross-sectional detail
be provided in those areas adjacent to freshwater wetlands.
• A test hole should be provided in the location of the proposed sanitary system within this lot
and the data provided.
Additionally, it is recommended that the Planning Board request the following information with
regard to the overall subdivision plan:
• Topographic contour elevations at a minimum contour interval of 2 feet should be provided.
• The first floor elevation proposed for each structure should also be depicted as well as the
associated grading and amount of fill anticipated.
• The acreage of upland and wetland habitats within each lot should be provided.
• The limit of clearing, grading and ground disturbance within each lot should be revised such that
it does not directly abut the building envelope.
Land Use and Zoning
The project site is located in an area that contains a mix of residential and undeveloped vacant
land. The dominant land use in the general area consists of vacant, undeveloped land and the
proposed residential use is consistent with surrounding uses. The site is currently undeveloped,
with the proposed development resulting in 3 residential lots. Although much of the site will be
"preserved", no portion of the site will remain in public open space and/or under open space
easements as indicated at this time. Residential land use is located to the west and south, with
the remaining tracts of land consisting of vacant, undeveloped woodland and wetlands.
The subject site is zoned R-80 Residential, which requires a minimum lot size of 80,000 SF, lot
coverage of 20% of the lot area, and a minimum livable floor area of 850 s.f. per dwelling. The
proposed lots do not meet all of the dimensional requirements within the R-80 zoning district,
however, should the Planning Board consider a cluster subdivision, smaller lots may be approved
NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS. LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING
Page 5
• • Milazzo @ Greenport
EAF Part I Review
NP&V#01220
based on an overall yield in order to preserve open space and/or environmentally sensitive
features. The use of clustering allows these dimensional requirements to be reduced in order to
maintain a larger part of the site as natural open space. As previously stated, the Planning Board
may wish to review a sketch plan that is more typically of a cluster design, with significantly
reduced lot sizes and dimensional requirements in order to preserve the sensitive environmental
features on site to the maximum extent practicable. Residential development of the resulting lots
created by the cluster subdivision should not require zoning variances, depending on final
building design and layout.
R-80 zoning is located to the west and east with R-40 located farther to the east and to the
southwest. LI and LIO zoning are located north of the site on the north side of the Long Island
Railroad. With respect to land use, the proposed project is similar to the residential
developments in the surrounding area and is an allowable use within the R-80 zoning district.
However, a previously stated, no dedicated preserved open space is depicted on the Cluster
Subdivision Map. The land use and zoning impacts of the proposed project are expected to be
marginal.
The Town of Southold Community Preservation Project Plan identifies how the Town intends to
preserve or protect properties that are integral to the unique community character of Southold
and is a guide intended for interested land owners who voluntarily chose to work with the Town
to preserve and protect privately owned real estate assets in a way that benefits the community at
large as well as the owner. The site is listed on the Eligible Parcel List in the Community
Preservation Project Plan, and is classified as "open space, including agricultural lands, fresh and
saltwater marshes, wetlands, and undeveloped beach lands or shoreline."
Traffic Generation
The proposed use would be expected to increase traffic generation upon full development of the
site as compared to existing conditions. Due to the location of the site and in consideration of
area roadways, an increase in trip generation at the site is not expected to have a significant
impact on the area roadways.
Soils and Topography
The site is relatively flat throughout, with all existing slopes in the proposed development area
between approximately 0-10%. The Suffolk County soil survey (Warner, 1975) identifies six
soil types on the subject site, which consist of the following:
Canadice silt loam, Ca: The Canadice series consists of deep, nearly level, poorly drained. Canadice
silt loam is the only Canadice soil in the county and has a slope of 3 percent of less. The hazard
of erosion is slight on this soil; the soil must be artificially drained fro successful production of
commonly grown crops,but a lack of suitable outlets makes artificial drainage difficult.
Deerfield sand, De: Deerfield sand is located between areas of somewhat poorly drained soils and
well drained or excessively drained soils at slightly higher elevations. Slopes are 3 percent of less
1
NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS,LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING
Page 6
• • Milazzo @ Greenport
EAF Part I Review
NP&V#01220
and are slightly concave in places. The hazard or erosion is slight. This soils is fairly well suited
to crops commonly grown in the country and it is seasonally too wet or too dry in the root zone.
Tidal Marsh, Tm: Tidal marsh is made up of wet areas that are throughout the county around the
borders of calmer embayment and tidal creeks. These level areas are no inundated by daily tide
flow, but they are subject to flooding during abnormally high moon or storm tides. These very
poorly drained areas are not suited to any kind of farming and are best suited to use as habitat for
certain types of wildlife.
Beach, Be: Beaches are made up of sandy, gravelly, or cobbly areas between water at mean sea level
and dunes or escarpments. Slope is nearly level in most areas and these areas are not suited to
farming. Measures should be taken to control erosion to keep the beach wide enough to protect
the nearby dunes or uplands.
Plymouth loamy sand, PlB - 3 to 8% slopes: The Plymouth series consists of deep, excessively
drained, coarse-textured soils. P1B soils have undulating slopes or they are single along the sides
of intermittent drainageways. The areas along intermittent drainageways are narrow and long,
and follow the course of the drainage channel. The hazard of erosion is slight and the soil tends
to be droughty. The soil is fairly well suited to the crops commonly grown in the county.
Riverhead sandy loam, RdA - 0-3 % slope: The Riverhead series consists of deep, well-drained
moderately coarse textured soils that formed a mantle of sandy loam or fine sandy loam over
thick layers of course sand and gravel. The soil survey lists the erosion hazard for RdA as slight,
and the soil is limited only be moderate droughtiness in the moderately coarse textured solum. It
tends to develop a plow pan if it is intensively farmed. This soil is well suited to all crops
commonly grow in the county and it is used extensively for that purpose.
The Soil Survey of Suffolk County also indicates the presence of a perennial stream associated
with "Moore's Drain". Moore's Drain is a large drainageway beginning northeast of the site and
extends through the central portion of the site terminating at Pipes Cove. Additionally, the site
inspection revealed several natural and man-made drainageways throughout the site. Portions of
these areas may be directly impacted following development.
Many of the soils on site do appear to present severe development constraints however, provided
proper planning and design are utilized in more sensitive areas, no significant impacts are
anticipated specifically with regard to soils. With regard to topography and drainage, potential
impacts may occur as a result of alteration of wetland features and drainageways, particularly
on Lot 3. Wetlands are further considered below and the depth to groundwater is considered in
the subsections dealing with water resources.
Wetlands
As previously stated, the site is vacant undeveloped woodland containing extensive freshwater
and tidal wetland habitats. Additional freshwater and tidal wetland habitats are located off-site
to the north, east and south of the subject property. The freshwater wetlands on site can be more
particularly described as NYSDEC designated freshwater wetland SO-15, which extends off site
to the north, north of the Long Island Railroad, as well as west of the site on the west side of
NELSON.POPE 6 VOORHIS, LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING
Page 7
• • Muazzo @ Greenport
EAF Part I Review
NP&V#01220
Pipes Creek Road. Tidal wetlands associated with Pipes Creek are located in the central portion
of the site and along the northeastern and southern property boundaries.
Additionally, the site inspection revealed the presence of an additional freshwater wetland
located just north of the proposed studio within Lot 3. A culvert connects this feature to the off-
site wetland to the north, which flows through a drainage channel through Lot 3 emptying into
the tidal wetlands on site. Additional drainage depressions were observed throughout Lot 3,
particularly just south and southeast of the proposed pool location. Additional ponded areas
were identified within the area proposed for development.
The NYSDEC regulates activities within 100 feet of a designated freshwater wetland and within
300 feet of tidal wetlands. Additionally, the Town Trustees regulate those activities within 100
feet of a wetland. Concerns and recommendations with regard to wetland features on site were
discussed in the Proposed Project description above.
Water Resources
Public water is supplied to the general area by the Suffolk County Water Authority, although the
site itself is not specifically connected to public water. The closest water main to the site is 8
inches in diameter and is located on the north side of Pipes Cove Road. The Brecknock Hall
Well Field & Pump Station is located on the north side of North Road, across from the
Manhasset Avenue intersection, northeast of the site. It is estimated that the 3 proposed
residential lots will utilize approximately 900 gallons of water per day. The applicant has
contacted the SCWA for a letter of water availability; SCWA indicated that water is currently
available for additional hook-ups however, given the current demand for water and the limited
capacity of the SCWA's north form system, SCWA cannot guarantee that water will be available
for this parcel at the time the applicant wishes to hook up.
Sanitary disposal within the proposed subdivision will be managed by on-site underground
sewage leaching systems. In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published the Long
Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study). The 208 Study
identified eight (8) hydrogeologic zones in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. These zones were
distinguished based upon differences in underlying groundwater flow patterns and water quality.
The subject site is located within SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which according
to Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, has an allowable flow of 600 gallons per day
(gpd) per acre in areas served by public water. The allowable nitrogen bearing flow is computed
utilizing only the upland portions of the site, in which the wetlands on site are reported on the
EAF Part I as consisting of 3.5 acres and on prior Cluster Sketch Plans as 4.2835 acres.
Therefore, the allowable nitrogen bearing flow for an estimated 8.2418 acre site is 2,473 gpd,
noting that additional surface water/wetland features on site have not been mapped. The sanitary
design flow is computed using the SCDHS manual Standards for Approval of Plans and
Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other Than Single Family Residences. The
manual establishes the design flow as follows:
Single family dwelling
300 gpd x 3 dwellings 900 gpd
NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS. LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL • PLANNING • CONSULTING
Page 8
• Milamo @ Greenport
EAF Part I Review
NP&V#01220
Therefore, the proposed applications would conform with Article VI of the Suffolk County
Sanitary Code and would not be expected to adversely affect groundwater quality provided
properly functioning systems are designed and installed.
The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site is less than 3 feet above mean sea level
(msl) according to the 1999 SCDHS water table map. The topographic elevation on site is
approximately 5 feet, as based on the Cluster Sketch Plan. Therefore, the depth to groundwater
would be expected at approximately 2 feet or less below the ground surface. However, the test
hole data included on the Cluster Sketch Plan indicates that groundwater is located
approximately 8.5 feet below the ground surface. It is recommended that the Cluster Sketch Map
be revised to indicate the elevation of the location of the test hole, particularly as this location is
significantly higher in elevation than the remainder of the site and is anticipated to consist
entirely of fill. As previously recommended, additional test holes should be provided in those
locations proposed for sanitary systems.
The direction of groundwater flow is expected to be horizontal and toward the nearest surface
water. The depth to groundwater on site is expected to have significant constraints on the
location of septic systems within the proposed residential lots as these lots are located at a
minimum elevation of less than approximately 5 feet above msl. A standard, three pool septic
system typically requires a minimum depth to groundwater of approximately 9-10 feet to allow
adequate depth for leaching. Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) Realty
subdivision (Article 6) and water supply (Article 4) approval is required should private water
supply wells be installed instead of public water. Further consideration with SCDHS is
recommended to ensure that the subdivision design is approvable in view of the shallow depth to
groundwater and additional water/wetland features on Lot 3. After subdivision approval, all lots
will require SCDHS approval prior to construction.
Ecological Resources
The majority of the site contains mature woodland, freshwater wetland and tidal wetlands
habitats. The site is part of a relatively large contiguous block of undeveloped land and is
expected to support a variety of wildlife species including birds, mammals and amphibians and
would support a greater variety of species including secretive and sensitive types given the
variety of habitats including fresh and tidal wetlands and upland fringe. No rare, threatened or
endangered plants were observed on site during limited field inspections. The NY Natural
Heritage Program (ECL 9-1503) was contacted to determine if there is any record of rare plants
or wildlife in the vicinity. The Program does not identify this area as a Significant Wildlife
Habitat, however lists one endangered vascular plant and one endangered beetle within historical
records on or in the immediate vicinity of the site.
The proposed project will result in clearing portions of the property with the potential for direct
fill within a freshwater wetland habitat and the significant loss of buffering vegetation causing
localized impacts. The Cluster Sketch Plan indicates the limits of clearing however, as
previously stated, these areas are part of the proposed lots and it may be difficult to maintain
NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS.LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING
Page 9
Milazzo @ Greenport
EAF Part I Review
NP&V#01220
these areas as natural and the Planning Board may want to consider the majority of the proposed
vegetative buffer areas as dedicated open space. In addition, the currently unmapped
water/wetland features provide habitat, buffering and linkages between tidal and freshwater
wetlands and add to the ecological sensitivity of the site. Finally, the project as planned will
fragment the habitat on site and may impair the value of the site for current wildlife populations.
SUMMARY
In conclusion, the proposed application would create 3 residential lots, which would generally
conform to the character of the area. The site contains significant environmental features that
would limit residential development. The Cluster Sketch Plan as currently proposed does not
appear to protect these features to the maximum extent practicable. The submitted cluster design
allocates the entire subject parcel into individual lots and no permanent preservation of open
space has been indicated. Further, the proposed layout is expected to have significant impacts to
the wetland features on site and may impact groundwater. Impacts to ecological resources are
also expected.
The proposed project will increase wastewater generation, solid waste generation and water use,
in addition to increasing taxes which would be distributed to the various jurisdictions. The site is
expected to increase the number of trips entering and exiting the site, although no significant
adverse impacts are expected.
Recommendations and findings of this report which the Planning Board may wish to consider are
listed below:
1. It is recommended that input from the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
(NYS OPRHP)be obtained to determine impacts with regard to cultural resources.
2. Clarification as to the ownership and legal easements of this right of way should be provided and
the Planning Board may wish to consider removal of this area from within the individual lots.
3. As "preserved areas" are part of the proposed lots and remote from areas enforceable by Town
personnel, it may be difficult to maintain these areas as natural and the Planning Board may want
to consider the majority of the proposed vegetative buffer areas as dedicated passive open space
should this area be of interest toward Town open space holdings.
4. As SCWA cannot guarantee the supply of public water, it is recommended that public water be
further pursued or a domestic potable water use altemative(s) be explored for approval by
SCDHS under Article 4.
5. The Planning Board may wish to review a sketch plan that is more typically of a cluster design,
with reduced lot sizes and dimensional requirements in order to preserve the sensitive
environmental features on site to the maximum extent practicable.
6. Within Lot 1, it is recommended that the plan be revised to delineate the correct location of the
100 foot setback line representing the eastern perimeter of the building envelope, to remove that
portion of the building envelope which is located within the "preserved area", and to identify the
limit of tidal wetlands along the lots frontage of Pipes Creek.
7. The Planning Board should also clarify and restrict the two isolated building envelopes within
both Lot 1 and Lot 2.
8. It is recommended that the Town Trustees verify the wetland boundaries on site.
NELSON. POPE 6 VOORHIS, LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING CONSULTING
Page 10
• ' Milazzo @ Greenport
EAF Part I Review
NP&V#01220
9. Within Lot 2, the Planning Board may wish to consider a building envelope within this lot that
maintains a 100 foot setback from the freshwater wetland boundary as well as the tidal wetland
boundary, with the limits of clearing, grading and ground disturbance located no closer than 75
feet from either wetland, as well as if the building envelope within the northern portion of the lot
is feasible. It is further recommended that the Cluster Sketch Plan be revised to delineate the
correct location of the 100 foot setback line representing the eastern perimeter of the building
envelope and to identify the limit of tidal wetlands along the lots frontage of Pipes Creek.
Further, the Planning Board may wish to consider natural revegetation of the 75 foot "preserved
area" within the southern portion of this lot.
10. It is recommended that the Planning Board request the following information for clarification
and/or to be added to the Cluster Sketch Plan in order to determine the environmental impact
associated with development on Lot 3:
• The Cluster Sketch Plan should indicate whether all of the wetland boundaries indicated on the
plan have been verified by the NYSDEC Bureau of Habitat Protection.
• It is recommended that the Town Trustees verify the wetland boundaries on site.
• The additional freshwater wetlands, culvert, and drainage channel located just north of the
proposed studio should be surveyed in the field and included on the subdivision plan. The
remaining drainageways and bridge to the south, southeast of the pool should also be located
for inclusion on the plan.
• The minimum setback distances between the Limit of Clearing and Ground Disturbance and
the wetland should be provided in all appropriate locations.
• The nature of the proposed driveway surface should be indicated and a cross-sectional detail
be provided in those areas adjacent to freshwater wetlands.
• A test hole should be provided in the location of the proposed sanitary system within this lot
and the data provided as well as sanitary grading/design and/or SCDHS approval.
It. Additionally, it is recommended that the Planning Board request the following information with
regard to the overall subdivision plan:
• Topographic contour elevations at a minimum contour interval of 2 feet should be provided.
• The first floor elevation proposed for each structure should also be depicted as well as the
associated grading and amount of fill anticipated.
• The acreage of upland and wetland habitats within each lot should be provided.
• The limit of clearing, grading and ground disturbance within each lot should be revised such
that it does not directly abut the building envelope.
12. With regard to topography and drainage, potential impacts may occur as a result of alteration of
wetland features and drainageways,particularly on Lot 3.
13. It is recommended that the Cluster Sketch Map be revised to indicate the elevation of the location
of the test hole, particularly as this location is significantly higher in elevation than the remainder
of the site and is anticipated to consist entirely of fill.
Based upon this review, the impacts noted, and the opportunity to explore alternatives, the Board
may wish to consider requiring a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) through the
issuance of a Positive Declaration. This would provide a means or documenting and analyzing
potential impacts in an orderly review process which allows for consideration of mitigation and
alternatives. If the Board finds that there are no potential significant adverse impacts, then a
Negative Declaration could be considered; however, it is recommended that the items listed
above be addressed.
t
r
f LSC . POPE 6 VOORHIS, LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING
Page 11
PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by.Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
John P. Milazzo & Rose L. Milazzo
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
Pipes Neck Road, Green ort T O Southold, Suffolk Count
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Youno & Young Attn: Thomas C. Wol rt (631) 727-2303
ADDRESS
400 Ostrander Avenue
CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE
Riverhead, N.Y. 11901
NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE
John P. Milazzo & Rose L. Milazzo M zze Fo'mI1, [LC�
ADDRESS
137 Kings Road
CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE
Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Realty Subdivision — 3 residential lots
Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial []Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) t _" a (non-farm)
❑Forest ❑Agriculture Other jZ,411A,r/7- 11A)I2 uF Qv6Q /AAI()
2. Total acreage of project area: 12.5 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 1.3 acres 1.3 acres
Forested (wooded) 7.7 acres 6.1 acres '1
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres 0 acres g
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 3.5 acres acres
Water Surface Area 0 acres acres Q(t J'0
Qd
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres acres ftR ie
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres O-h acres 0- k
Other (Indicate type) Lawns & Landscaping 0 acres 1.0 acres 1�
What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? RdA—Riverhead sandy loam 0.
a. Soil drainage: KlWell drained -9A'14 % of site LIModerate y well drained 14 %\of site
)Poorly drained _ % of site 3�°7o C ( `t•LS o.c;e s w,,�\,nck )
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres Of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS
Land Classification System? N/A_ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [Dyes 1XNo
a. What is depth to bedrock? NSA (in feet)
2
5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: Y�10-10% 100 % x]10-15% 0 %
8715% or greater 0 %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? []Yes )CNo
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the,Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes $7No
8. What is the depth of the water table? 0'-6' (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [�Yes ❑No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes 8]No
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
:]Yes E3No According to Young & Young
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
[]Yes :XNo Describe
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
❑Yes INNo if yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
❑Yes [XNo
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Pipes Creek (V\cxryS llr 'n 011 nni[ TLFa, \
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 61l P.„r..
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name Pipes Cove i NVSOEL Fr�ch Sin � b. Size (In acres) N•A. '-` q. �9 7
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ❑Yes 1XNo SO -IS
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? []Yes ❑No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []Yes []No
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 3042 []Yes SJNo
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6172 ❑Yes L3No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes [g N0
B. Project Description i, (� 6ZS lfEnacr�p ti
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in di ensions as appropriate) l A li7.?
a. Total contiguous acreage ownedor c ed by project sponsor 12.5 acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: 9.0 cres initially; A 9.0 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 3.5 acres. /O. 9
d. Length of project, in miles: N.A. (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N.A. %;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2 proposed 6
g. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour 5 (upon completion of project)? -
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially 3
Ultimately 3
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 35' height; 50' width; 60' length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 52 ft.
3
2 How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tonslcubic yards
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? FUyes ONo ❑NIA
a. If es, for what intended ? To facilitate the proposed improvemeni
Y purpose is the site being reclaimed.
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ]Yes ONo
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ONo
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 1.6 acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
❑Yes ®No
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 24 months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased: N.A.
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month. year.
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ONo
8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes ®No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 15 after project is complete 0
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes K)No If yes, explain
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes �JNo
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes ❑No Type Sanitary
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? 1KYes ZED
Explain . o,— sue.
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood pain? nYes ONo
16. Will the project generate solid waste? WYes ONo
a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons t 0. 68 tpnt�ivonyh baQc on /Sl6s��o
R�
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? LqYes ONo
c. If yes, give name 'te n FESa7
Fr4XLC l VKylocation
/ *—i�r> mwH evrcHd uE
circ--
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposalsystem or into a sanitary landfill? NYes ONo
e. If Yes, explain Materials removed from the waste stream for reuse and/or recycling
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes ®No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? %Yes ONoie. Lawn Care
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes nNo
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? OYes nNo
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? nYes ONo
If yes , indicate type(s) Fossil fuels & electricity
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 5 gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day 900 gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Oyes NNo
If Yes, explain
4
25. Approvals Required: Submittal
Type Date
XX${$Town, Village Board ❑Yes ENo
4Town,NXK*Fe Planning Board ]Yes ❑No Subdivision 6/2001
City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ' No
City, County Health Department ®Yes ❑No Water Supply & Sewage Disposal 6/2001
Other Local Agencies Southold Town 6Yes ❑No Wetlands 6/2001
Trustees
Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes nNo
State Agencies NYSDEC ®Yes ❑No Rd
dal Wetlands & Freshwater 6/2001
We
Federal Agencies ❑Yes ®No tlands
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? K]Yes ❑No
If Yes, indicate decision required:
❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit Esubdivision []site plan
❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? R-80
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
N.A.
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N.A.
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
N.A.
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? LAYes No
"�/ fbl c .nand s> "
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/. .mile radius of propose action? Cahm�ti r
Land Uses: Residential; Zoning: R-80 ;L- 1/0 la e7 Q;^ a�4'�0,t,
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within 'a Y, mile? MYes []No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many plots are proposed? 3
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed?' Sq. Ft- 5S5 SZZ S•F
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes %)No
11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? Eyes ❑No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? X7Yes ❑No
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ®No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑No
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name oward W. Young Date June 27, 2001
Signature Title Land Surveyor
If the action is in the Coastal ea, and u are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
5
515 425 _25^r F'.02/07 - -
Part#PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR IDNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency
General information (Read Carefudy)
• in completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmentsi analyst,
• The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
• The impacts of each project or each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been Offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question
• The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
• In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
is. Answer each of the 20 questions In PART 2. Answer Yea if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yea answers.
c. tf answering Yea to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 orsize I
impact, It Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact w�I cCcur bunt
threshold Is lower than example, check column t.
d. Idemin,ing that an impact will be potentially large(column 2)does not mean that It is also necessarily siyniflant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 t0 determine significance. identifying an impact Ir. column 2 simply
asks that I be looked at further.
e. if reviewer has doubt about size of the Impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
t. If a pntsnnally large Impact checked In column 2 can be mitigated by change(a)in the project to s small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response Indicates that such a reduction Is not possible. This
must be explained In Part 3.
2 8
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
IMPACT ON LAND Moderate large Mitigated By
1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Impact Impact Project Change i
EXaRtplaa that would apply to column 2 ONO EYES
• Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per loo
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed ❑ ['Yes ❑Nc
10%.
• Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than r
3 feet. J Eyes ❑No
• Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles, [
• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within L [1Yes ❑Ne
❑
3 feet of existing ground surface, 'JYes ❑No
• Construction that will continue for mcre than I year or involve more [
char, one phase cr stage. [ :]Yes QNo i
i
• Excavation for mining purposes rhat would remove more than 1,000
tons of natural material (,.a, rock or sail) per year. [ = I ^,
Yes No
• Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill, —
L
• Construction in a designated floodway. I cties [NO
• Other impacts ❑ a Eyes [No
❑Yes ,No
2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on
the site?(i.a., clif's, dunes, geological formations, ett.)NNO ❑YES
• Specific land forms: _ yi
❑ dyes IDNo
125 1^S" 3
516 c..r P.9 /07
• 2 3
IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be
By
3 \nidi proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large projecMitigt
Chted ng
Impact Impact Protect Change
!Under Arrc',.rs 15, 24, 25 0'the Environmental Conservation Law, FCL) ,
GNO EYES
Examples [hat would apply to column 2
• Developab a area of site contains a protected water body. FT ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Dredging more than 100 cubic vards of material from channel of a []Yes 0 N
protected strezr.,.
• Extensior,o' utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. I ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [7 No
• Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nu
• Other impacts. CAssuse IMW i A•s 1ILiirA.sn auar" _ ❑ UYes
No
GABA AhIsAir "m _9JWMMCZU w&rsih"'Ds
4, Will proposed action a`fect any non-protected existing or new body
Of water? ❑NO EYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
• Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts. AJr wirriiikii Yes ONO
Au0 VaAjose, Ad&&S I
5, Will Propused Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? ❑NO EYES
Examples that would appiv to column 2
• Proposed Action will require a discharge permit, ❑ ❑ /❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed fiction requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ■ Eyes [1No
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
• Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ Utes ONO
gal!ons per minute pumping capacity
• Construction or operation causing any contamination of a waktr ■ ❑ ElYes ONO
supply system.
• Proposec Action will adversely affect groundwater, ■ ❑ nyes ENO
• '.iquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
do no: exist or have inadequate capacity
• Proposed Action would use water !n excess of 20.000 gallons per ❑ ❑ j ❑Yes ❑No
day.
• Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ L'iyes ONO
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast tc natural conditions
• Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑NO
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
• Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ■ Eyes ENO
ar for sewer services.
• Proposed Action locates commercial andror industrial uses which may ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
• Other impacts.__ ❑ ❑ :]Yes 'No
F Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water r noff? ❑,gip EYES
Examples that would apply to co'umn 2
• P"Oposed Acton wouio charge flood water flows. ❑ C `._Yes ❑No
7
516 4251257 F.04/07
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
impact impact Project Change
• Proposed Action .ray cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ QYes ❑No
• Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ EYes ❑No
• Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway ❑ wyes ❑No
• Other impacts _._ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO ❑YE5
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will induce 1 000 or more Vil le :rips in any diver ❑ G ❑Yes No
hour.
• Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
refuse per hour.
• Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ Q is Yes ONO
heat source producing more than 10 million 6TH"s per hour.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ C 1 ❑Yes ONO
to industrial use.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial "I ❑ ❑Yes ❑Na
development within existing industrial areas.
• Other impacts: Q ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? C1 NO AYES
Examples that would apply to column '_
• Reduction of one or more species listed on the New 'cork or Federal ❑ r Nye$ ONO
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
• Removal of al portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat ❑ NYes ❑No
• Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other Q ❑ ❑Yes ONO
than for agricultcral purposes.
• Other imaacu:_ Q d Cyes El No
9 Will Proposed o.ccton sutstantialiv affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? ❑NO GYE5
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Anion would suhstantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
• Proposed Action requires the removal. of more than 10 acres I ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
of mature forest rover 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricuitural land resources?
ONO ❑YE5
Examples that would apply to column 2
• —re proposed actio, Would sever, cross or iln-it access to agricultural ❑ r, ❑Yes '❑No
!and (incudes repand, hayfields, pasture vineyard, orchard, etc.;
a
YOBv - :(A
ria 1G� _��t P.AJ/'017
2 3
Small to potential Can Impact Be i
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact , Impact Project Change
• Lons"sur_tir n activity would excavate or -compact the soil profile of 7 ❑Yes ENo
agncuitura and.
• The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres C ._ ❑Yes Z'No
of agricul-.:al ;a^ic or if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 a-Nies of agricultural lard.
• The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑Yes CNo
lard ma^agement systems (e g., suosurface dram lines, outlet ditches,
strip cmppingl; or crate a neer for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increascd runoff)
• Other mpac.'s: _-- ❑ I n EJ-Yes ZNo
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCE'S
11 W ill proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO •YES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to co umn 2
• Proposed !and uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ Yes MNo
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made a natural
• Pr000sed Land usesr or protect components visible to users of S Yes 11 No
aesthetic resrarces which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment or the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
• Project comoonerts that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ � I ❑"res ❑Nn
screenirg of scenic views known to be important to tine a-ea.
• Other imracts. — - Q ❑ Dyes CINo
,
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
`2 Will Proposed Action impact anv site or structure 0 historic, pre-
historic or paleontological Importance' ONO OYES
Examples tnat would apply to column 2
• Proposed Acton occurring wholly or partialis within o• substantially ❑ �r Yes CJ-No
coniignous to an,, facility or site listec on the State or National Register
of historic placss.
• Any impact tc an archaeological sit* or fossil bed iocatec within the ❑ r 11yes ❑NO
project site.
• Proposed Action will occur In an area designated as sensitive for ❑ r Byes JNo ,
archaeciclticacites on the NYS Site inventory,
• Other .mipactr,^___. ❑ _ ❑Yes :)No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION `
13 Wlil Froprsed Acton affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities?
Examples that wouid apply to column 2 ENO SYES
• The permanent forec,o;ure of a future recreational opportunity. '`� ❑ Yes ❑No
• A major :adaction of an open space irnpo-tant to the community. .rr Eyes :]No
• Other impacts: ___ ��______�, _ u ❑ QYes []No
-5-2C7 `5_ 51t?. ^25 ^_257 P.06/0-
I3
Small to otentisi I can Imoaet Be
Moderate Large Mitigated
Mitigated By
Impact Impact R Project Change
IMPACT ON.CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS
4. Will proposed fiction impact the exceptiooai or unique character-
istics of a cr tical environmental area (CEA; established pursuant to
:�bdivision 6 ^, CRR 617.14(g; 7-NO rrJYES
Lis:the enviro+manta! characteristics that cawed the designation of
the CEP..
Examples that vrouid apply cc coiurnn 2
• r>rciposed Actian to ocate within, the CEA? ❑ ! ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action wi I result a reduction in the quar,tity of the resource' �r. ❑ ❑Y as 'tel NO
..n
+ Proposed Ac"-,o: wlil result in a reduction in the 4u2iity Oc
o` the resrce? [:]Yes N°
• Proposed iictrr ,A: invppa the use, tunC:0r. or enioyment of the ❑ '❑ ❑Yes ❑No
resource?
• Otho; ❑Yes ❑No
impacts. ._.
❑�
I
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
15. 'Hill tnere be a". et'ect to er,sting transportation systems?
iN0 ❑YEs
Examples That Nsovd appiv :o cc' rin 2
• rrefat,on c preselt pa crus r, mo pr.ent of peoals andfor goods. ❑ h ❑Yes ❑No
• P,oposed A. or ,y,, it result ,r ma,or traffic prcblema. ❑ C ❑Yes r7 No
• Other impacts C: ❑ CYes ❑N°
IMPACT ON ENERGY
Ib Will proposed action affect the community s sources of fuel or
energy suppl•,? fNO 0Y ES
Examples that would apply tc column 2
• Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5'Yo mcre2se In the use of ❑ C ❑Yes JNo
pnv form o- enerlg{ it the mUnic'pa JtV
+ Proposed Ac:ior, will rerau-.:e the creation or extension. of an energy C ❑ ZYes I❑No `
transmission nr supply sv;tem 'o serve more than So single or two family
residences or to serve a maior commercial s Industrial use.
•
Other irnpacti. - - - ❑ ❑Yes .7 No
i
1n
515 425 125" P.07/07
NOISE ANRDOR IMPACTS 2 3
Sm to Potentia! Can Impact Be
17 Will there be abiecticnable odors, noise, or vibration as a result Moderate large Mitigated By
e' the Frovosed Action? GNC -1YE5 Impact Impact Project Change
Examples .hat wou,d apply to colrimn 2
a Hitsting w,,.thin 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ [:'v es CNo
facility
• Odors will occur routinely(T:ore than one hour per day). ❑ u ❑Yes ❑No
a proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑'t'es ❑No
ambient roise levels for noise outside of structures.
• Proposed A.ctior witl remove raturai barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
noise screen
• Other inpac:s ❑Yes :]No
s i
— I
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
'8. Wil Propased Action affect public health and safety?
MNO LYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ J Yes :]No
substances J_e oil. pesticides,chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of
o
accide^.t , upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge, or emission.
• Proposed Action may result,in the bur al of "hazardous wastes" in any i❑ i ❑ ❑Yes ONO
form (I e, toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc)
• Storage f;cil,ties for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ []Yes 7J No
gas or other flammable liquids.
• Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance J ❑ ❑IYes 7 N
within 2,000 Took of a site used 'for the disposal of solid or hazardous !
waste.
• Other impacts: J C ❑Yes 7JNo
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD
19 W'ili proposed action affect the chatacter of the existing community?
uNO YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The permanent population of the city, town Or village in which the u ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
+ The municipal Oudget for capital expenditures or operating services f u 1 ❑ Dyes CNo
will ncroase by more, than 5% per year as a result of this project.
• Proposed action wil conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ lyes []No
• Pr000sed acticr, will cause a change in the density of land use. , ❑ ❑Yes '❑No
• Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑Yes JNo
or areas of historic importance to the corrmutnty. I
• Development will create a demand for additional community services i ■ ❑ OYes CNo
(e.g schools, police and fire, ecc.1
• Proposed Acton will set an important precedent for future protects_ ❑1 ❑ Eyes 1:No
• Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. U ❑ ❑Yes El No
• Other Impacts:------ --_-.--- C ❑ ❑Ycs ❑NO
20 Iii there, er !s there !ikely to be. public contreversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts?
L]NO 5YES
If any sotlon IF Part 2 Is Ideatifled as a potential large impact or if you cannot determine tot magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Pan 9
Yt
-0-HL P.07
r sr • • "�""KJI
NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC
ENVIRONMENTAL, PLANNING, CONSULTING
(631)427-5665 572 Walt Whitman Road
FAX(631)427-5620 Melville,NY 11747
TO: Mark Terry Date:. 10-May-02
Town of Southold
Planning Board Office,Town Hall Re: Milazo Property,Southold
53095 Main Road
Southold,NY 11971-0959 Job No.
We are sending you �X Under separate cover
X Herewith
Pick Up By Messenger
For Your Review&Comment
Approval
As requested
X For your use
Bid Submission
Quantity Drawing Title Sheet No. Date
1 NYS OPRHP correspondence
Remarks:
A¢n 7�`ti
6[ v
Plea<;e feel free to call should you have any questions or require any additional information.
1. f
MAY 14 [uhc ::.,�
Southold Town
Very trul y yours, Planning Board
NELSON,POPE &VOORHIS,LLC
By: Shana Lacey
r � •
�yroN.
g ro
g New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation
Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau
o NEW YORK STATE Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8843
Bernadette Castro
Commissioner
May 3, 2002
Shana M. Lacey
Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC
572 Walt Whitman Road
Melville, New York 11747-2188
Dear Ms. Lacev:
Re: SE RA
Milazo Property
Southold, Suffolk County
02PRI918
Thank you for requesting the comments of the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic
Preservation(OPRHP) concerning your project's potential impact/effect upon historic and/or
prehistoric cultural resources. Our staff has reviewed the documentation that you provided on
your project. Preliminary comments and/or requests for additional information are noted on
separate enclosures accompanying this letter. A determination of impact/effect will be provided
only after ALL documentation requirements noted on any enclosures have been met. Any
questions concerning our preliminary comments and/or requests for additional information should
be directed to the appropriate staff person identified on each enclosure.
In cases where a state agency is involved in this undertaking, it is appropriate for that
agency to determine whether consultation should take place with OPRHP under Section 14.09 of
the New York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law. In addition, if there is any
federal agency involvement, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations, "Protection
of Historic and Cultural Properties" 36 CFR 800 requires that agency to initiate consultation with
the State Historic Preservation Officer(SHPO).
When responding, please be sure to refer to the OPRHP Project Review (PR)number
noted above.
cy' �1 Y,
uth L. Pierpont
1
Director
Enclosure(s)
MAY 011 `v
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Agency
LJ pnrted on re,dW paper
ORCHEOLOGY COMMENTS .
02PRO1918
Based on reported resources, there is an archeological site in or adjacent to your project area. Therefore the
Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) recommends that a Phase 1 archeological survey is
warranted for all portions of the project to involve ground disturbance, unless substantial prior ground
disturbance can be documented. If you consider the project area to be disturbed, documentation of the
disturbance will need to be reviewed by OPRHP. Examples of disturbance include mining activities and multiple
episodes of building construction and demolition.
A Phase 1 survey is designed to determine the presence or absence of archeological sites or other cultural
resources in the project's area of potential effect. The Phase 1 survey is divided into two progressive units of
study including a Phase 1A sensitivity assessment and initial project area field inspection, and a Phase 1B
subsurface testing program for the project area. The OPRHP can provide standards for conducting cultural
resource investigations upon request. Cultural resource surveys and survey reports that meet these standards will
be accepted and approved by the OPRHP.
Our office does not conduct cultural resources surveys. A 36 CFR 61 qualified archeologist should be retained to
conduct the Phase 1 survey. Many archeological consulting firms advertise their availability in the yellow pages.
The services of qualified archeologists can also be obtained by contacting local, regional, or statewide professional
archeological organizations. Phase 1 surveys can be expected to vary in cost per mile of right-of-way or by the
number of acres impacted. We encourage you to contact a number of consulting firms and compare examples of
each firm's work to obtain the best product.
Documentation of ground disturbance should include a description of the disturbance with confirming evidence.
Confirmation can include current photographs and/or older photographs of the project area which illustrate the
disturbance (approximately keyed to a project area map), past maps or site plans that accurately record previous
disturbances, or current soil borings that verify past disruptions to the land. Agricultural activity is not considered
to be substantial ground disturbance and many sites have been identified in previously cultivated land.
If you have any questions concerning archeology, please contact MICHAEL SCHIFFERLI at 518-237-8643. ext
3281
http://sphinx/PR/PMReadForm.asp'?iPrn=1&iF1d=288&sSFile=form4.htm 5/1/02
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek M
Arshamomaque
760 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport,New York 11694
(631)477 3608
rwr 13 2002
MEMBERS: May 13, 2002 Southold Town
George&Jean Betzios Suffolk County Water Authority Planning Board
Darlene Capobianco 624 Old Riverhead Road
Frank&Gina Chircop
Anthony&Jeannine Contino Westhampton Beach, New York 11978
Irene&Tom Costas
Lisa& Je Costas Dear Sir or Madam:
Tom&Jenn Costas
KC. Coughlin
Barbara Dai
Padre&Rich DelVecchio The Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek would like the
Christine Durkin following information forwarded to it as soon as possible. In a
Jennifer Durkin telephone conversation this date, Vlfe were advised to put this
Mary Ann Durkin
Jean Eckardt request in writing to your office.
Edward Flynn
Fortunato P. &Valerie Foil There is a Suffolk Coumy Water Authority water main
Ignatia E. Foti
Jeff Goubeaud located on Pipe Road,s Neck Rd, Greenport, New York which
Dennis& Kathleen Green services the homes on Pipes Neck Road and the homes on a
C Doug Hardy private right of way off Pipes Neck Road. We would like the
Betty Hintze
Henry Hintze following Information related to this service.
Al&Sue Homan
Julia&Timothy Kilcullen (1) Which Water Authority well services this main,
Kristinamann L
Patricia Lauth where it is located, and what is its size and capacity?
Deborah Lindsay
Lynn Mastrota (Z) How many homes or businesses, etc are serviced
Steven Minervini
Dennis Palumbo by this well and how many mains are connected to it?
Anna Pekunka
Mike Pekunka (3) What is the total usage of this well for the last
Aidan&Eileen O'Reilly
Steven(Larry)Reiter year?
Eleanor&Fred Rempe
Rick Ramps
Angela Rich (4) How many new connections to this well have been
William Russack granted in the last two years?
Brian&Maryanne Russell
Eric Sweeting (5) What is the maximum service capacity pa ty(resldenCes
and/or businesses) that can optimally be sustained by this
well?
(6) What is the drought reserve for the accounts
on this well?
(7) We would like to receive copies of the last two
years test results on this well.
Thank you for your anticipated speedy reply.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
CC: Michael LoGrande
Timothy Hopkins
Town of Southold Planning Board
CHARLES R.CUDDY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
445 GRIFFING AVENUE
RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK
M-111- Address: TEL: (631)369-8200
P.O. Box 1547 FAX: (631)369-9050
Riverhead,NY 11901 E-mail: creuddy@earthlinh.net
May 8, 2002 L j. tl / /6�'/ a 25 '
To i�wN C�Erzl�
Planning Board
Southold Town Hall 251/010 oZ - C K_
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Milazzo Subdivision
Pipes Neck Road, Greenport, NY 11944
Gentlemen:
In connection with the above subdivision application, and at your request, enclosed
please find a check made payable to the Southold Town Planning Board in the
amount of$250. This check represents payment of the balance due for preparation
of the SEQRA report.
Very truly yours,
C (
C'lc�r,�, CccdcP� tJ
Charles R. Cuddy
Enciosure
CRC:cg
f
11ar 10 2002
Soudw Tow n
gni93=d
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport,New York '11544
(631)477 3608
V �9
May 2, 2002
MAY 0 3 2002
MEMBERS: Mr. Michael L f Water Authority Chairman
Suffolk County SoutholdTown
George&Jean Betzios 4060 Sunrise Highway Planning Board
Darlene Capobianco Oakdale, NY 11769-0901
Frank&Gina Chircop
Anthony&Jeannine Contino
Irene&Tom Costasmel
use&Ty costas Reference: Milazzo application for water for a proposed 3 pa
Tom&Jenn Costas subdivision Southold SCTM#1000-53-1-9
K.C.Coughlin
Barbara Dai
Pedra&Rich Dervecchio
Christine Durkin
Jennifer Durkin Mr. LoGrande,
Mary Ann Durkin
Jean Eckardt Despite your assurances to us that Mr. Milazzo has
Edward Flynn
Fortunate P.&Valerie Foti recused himself from involvement on behalf of the SCWA in his
Ignatia E. Fotii family's subdivision application forwater, we-found the attaohed
Jeff Goubeaud
Dennis&Kathleen Green documents on file at the Town pfSouthold Punning office'
C Doug Hardy
Betty Hintze please note the following:
Henry Hintze1 John Gppi(azzo`s (attorney for SCWA) GOver letter
C.At li Sue Homan
Julia&Timothy Kilcullen appears on the list of SCWA approved connections
Kristin Kiiemann in the Town of Southold.
Patricia Lauth 2, Mr. Milazza's property is included On that list page
Deborah Lindsay
Lynn Mastrota 6) even though he was to have no involvement.
ith
Steven Minervini the subdivision application for water.
Aldan Dennis Palumbo
ice o°Reily 3. The list contains almost 500 approved connections
Steven(Carty) Reiter
for building lots. Mr. Milazzo's property is the only
Eleanor&Fred Rempe •proposed' subdivision on that list.
Rids Rempe4. One week after submitting an unapproved
Angela Rich ranted a
William Russack subalivisfon plan, Mr. Mllazzo was g
Brian&Maryanne Russell SCWA connection.
Eric Sweating still has no approved building
Kathleen M.Tole 5. Mr. Milazzo's property
Olga M.Tolelots, yet you have approved water connections for
them. list
6. Mr. Milazzo's property is not on the separate
with other subdivision applicants (see last two
pages of attachments.)
6. Mr. Milazzo's property did not have the critical
environmental or water usage review that you
stated was necessary prior to approval for
connection to water service.
The situation that you assured the Traveler Watchman and its readers
would not occur(9/20/01, "What Gives at Pipes Creek?"), had happened five
months earlier.
We request an explanation why the process you described was not
adhered to by your organization. We further request that you expedite our April
22, 2002 FOIL request for documents. There is no question in our mind that, at
the very least, an impropriety has occurred and a conflict of interest continues to
exist. A conflict that moved this application to the top of the list.
Your response is greatly anticipated.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
CC: Governor George E. Pataki
Hillary Rodham Clinton, US Senator
Felix J. Grucci, Jr., Member of Congress
Kenneth P. LaValle, NYS Senator
Patricia L. Acampora, NYS Assemblywoman
Robert J. Gaffney, Suffolk County Executive
Paul J. Tonna, Presiding Officer, Suffolk County Legislature
Joshua Horton, Supervisor, Town of Southold
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board
Val Soopaz, Senior Planner
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Chairman, Town Trustees
Richard C. Ryan, Chairman, Land Preservation Committee
Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Officer
Gwynn Schroeder, North Fork Environmental Council
Suffolk Times
Traveler Watchman
• • 5�f ulR Ftt-,G-
I/5
M l`
Pe>
41SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
Timothy J. Hopkins Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769-0901
General Counsel
(631)563-0236
Fax(631) 563-0370
April 2, 2002
W. Mark Terry
Senior Environmental Planner
Town of Southold APR 2002P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-1938
Southhokl Town
Re: Water Supply Applications Planning Board
Dear Mr. Terry:
Please find attached a list of the Town of Southold water service applications addressed by the
Suffolk County Water Authority for your review. New entries are in BOLD typeface.
There are several categories on the list of Connections Granted by SCWA. They are as follows:
Category When can connection be established"
No note Connect when apply
Existing Main Parcel on existing main, connect when apply
Existing Main (9/01) Parcel on existing main, connect after 9/01
Main Extension Extension needed to serve parcel, extend when apply
Main Extension Required (9/01) Extension needed to serve parcel, consider after 9/01
Existing Main (9/02) Parcel on existing main, connect after 9/02
Main Extension Required (9/02) Extension needed to serve parcel, consider after 9/02
" all connections/extensions subject to SCWA having water available.
Town of Southold Water Applications
Page Two
April 2, 2002
Also Included is a list of applications for water service for subdivisions. Their status is indicated
in the"Notes" column. Lastly, there is a listing of applications for water service which are
outside the water service area as defined by the Town.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 631-563-0308.
Very truly yours,
-4'4 7
ohn C. Milazzo
Attorney
Enclosures
Outside Water Service Area
Manzi Homes Inc. 1000-059-08-004.002 Soundview Road, Southold 01/08/2002
Racanelli Realty Services 1000-069-01-004.001 N/s Middle Road,Peconic 03/02/2001
Cnnrrp,Ervin 1000-074-03-022 Carroll Avenue,Peconic 10/17/2001
Murphy,Frank 1000-074-04.004.008 S/s Middle Road,Peconic 03/02/2001
Dwyer, Tracy 1000-083-04-010 1290 Duck Pond Road, Cutcho 06/27/2001
Schneider,Ernest 000-095-03-010 and 101-01-014.00 Alvah's Lane, Cutcho a 01/08/2002
Tide Gm ,Inc. 1000-096-01-001 N/s Middle Road,Pecomc 04/11/2001
McLean,Derek 1000-108-04-007.041 W/s Gabriella Court,Mattituck 04/11/2001
Duffy,James 1000-109-02.002.001 Alvah's Lane,Cutcho a 12/20/2001
Harborview Homes,Inc. 1000-109-02-006 N/E/C Main Road and Alvah's Lane,Cutcho 09/14/2001 •
Reilly,Edward 1000-109-05-014.033 Fairway Drive, Cutcho 05/07/2001
•
04/01/2002 Page 1 of t
Southold Hardships/Connections Granted by SCWA
Gre een,John 1000- Brook Lane,Southold 01/05/1999
Healy,Thomas 1000- The Greenw (460),East Marion 08/08/2000
Kruskowski,Todd 1000- Main Road(60335), Southold 12/08/1998 03/23/1999 25-1-05-0-132-500-1
Laoudis,Ted Mevila Corp.
1000- Angel Shores 09/16/1998
(Blanket Approval?)
Foster,Mary 1000-013-03-002 Northview Drive(855),),Brown's Hill 05/11/2000
Estate
Ryall,William 1000-013-03-005.002 Brown's Hill Estate 07/06/2000
Austin,William and Marie 1000-021-05-006 Pebble Beach Farms,East Marion 12/08/1998 02/17/2000 25-1-12-0-309-500-1
Zoitas,John 1000-021-05-014 The Long W (5405),East Marion 07/06/2000 10/26/2000 25-1-12-0-300-500-1
Gianukakis,Ida 1000-021-05-016 The Long W 5280),East Marion 09/17/1999 02/14/2000 25-11-120-305-500-1
Wachtel,Philip 1000-030-02-002 Peeble Beach Farms(Lot 1),The Long 02/08/2000 no 25-1-12-0-366-500-1
Way,East Marion
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-030-02-014 The Crossway,East Marion 09/01/2000 04/04/2001 25-1-12-0-357-600-1
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-030-02-015 The Crossway,East Marion 09/01/2000 12/26/2000 25-1-12-0-357-500-1
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-030-02-016 The Crosswa ,East Marion 09/01/2000 05/08/2001 25-1-12-0-343400
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-030-02-017 The Crossway,East Marion 09/01/2000
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-030-02-018 The Crossway 485),East Marion 01/12/2000 07/26/2000 25-5-12-0-343-500-1
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-030-02-020 The Crossway,East Marion 09/01/2000
Map of Pebble Beach Farms(Lot 27),East
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-030-02-028 Marion 11/29/1999 05/18/2000 25-1-12-0-637-600-1
Meyer 1000-030-02-030 The Crescent 630),East Marion 10/01/1999 11/02/2000 25-1-12-0-637-500-1
Grant,Everett and Rosalyn 1000-030-02-035 Pebble Beach Farms,East Marion 12/08/1998
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-030-02-036 The Green 980),East Marion 08/21/1998 09/16/1998 25-1-120-333-100-1
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-030-02-044 The Green (515),East Marion 09/17/1999 05/15/2000 25-1-12-0-344-500-1
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-030-02.046 The Czossway,East Marion 09/01/2000
Ribaudo,Ronald 1000-030-02.056 The Strand(1920),East Marion 09/17/1999 04/24/2000 25-1-120-323-500-1
Koutsoubis,Alex 1000-030.02-064 The Strand(1610),East Marion 10/21/1999 12/28/1999 25-1-12-0-321-500-1
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-030-02-075 The Strand(1125),East Marion 11/22/2000 Existing 04/30/2001 25-1-120-351-500-1
main 9/01)
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-03002-089 The Strand 245),East Marion 08/08/2000 12/15/2000 25-1-120-352-500-1
Patane, Alfredo 1000-030-02-093 The Long Way(44),East Marion 08/02/2001 Existing
main(9/01)
Sande,Michael 1000-030-02-094 The Long W 4260),East Marion 11/04/1999 12/14/2000 25-1-12-0-304-500
Apidopoulos,Donna 1000-030-02-110 The Cross Way(110),East Marion 11/08/2001 Existing
Main
04/01/2002 Page 1 of 22
Southold Hardships/Connections Granted by SCWA
DeMesquita,Marion 1000-034-03-045 Bridge Street(155), Greenport 08/02/2001 Existing
main(9/01)
Koehler,Nancy 1000-034-05-019 Cham lin Place(870),Greenport 08/08/2000 25-1-110-138-750-1
Kramer, Valerie 1000-034-05-020 Manhanset Avenue, Greenport 09/01/2000
Pet",Theodore 1000-035-01-008 North Road,Greenport 08/08/2000 02/21/2001 25-1-100-197-500-1
Zorn,Bobi The Shady Lady 1000-035-01-021 and
Inn 1000-35-01-022 Main Road(455),Greenport 02/08/2000
Latham, Carlton Terry 1000-035-03-007 Gull Pond Lane(5 10), Greenport 07/17/2000
Beckwith,Richard 1000-035-03-012.1 Gull Pond Lane, Greenport 08/08/2000
Beckwith,Richard 1000-035-03-012.4 Gull Pond Lane,Greenport 08/08/2000 •
Fragola,Donna 1000-035-04-008 Gull Pond Road(1145), Greenport 01/08/2002 Existing
Main
Hamilton,Kenneth 1000-035-05-022 Wiggins Lane,Green rt 09/01/2000
Moglia,John 1000-035-06-008 Snug Harbor Road(475), Greenport 06/27/2001 Existing
main(9/01
Vardaro,Pasquale 1000-035-06-010 Marine Place(365), Greenport 04/01/1998
Red Maple Builders,Inc. 1000-035-06-011 Marine Place(265),East Marion 01/14/2000 06/23/1998 25-1-12-0-164-500-1
Galla er,Thomas 1000-035-06-06 Snug Harbor Road(235),East Marion 12/02/1999 08/18/2000 25-1-12-0-164-600-1
Summit Estates 1000-035-08-005.010 East Marion 09/01/2000 02/24/2000 25-1-12-0-157-500-1
Summit Estates 1000-035-08-005.011 East Marion 09/01/2000
Summit Estates 1000-035-08-005.012 East Marion 09/01/2000
Summit Estates 1000-035-08-005.013 East Marion 12/08/1998
Summit Estates 1000-035-08-005.014 East Marion 09/01/2000
Summit Estates 1000-035-08-05.009 East Marion 09/01/2000
Catherine Mesiano, Inc. 1000-036-02-010 Meadow Lane and Fiddler Lane, 08/08/2000
Greenport
Connors,Brian&Mary Ellen 1000-037-02-014.001 Old Orchard Lane,East Marion 08/02/2001 Existing •
main(9/01)
DeFilippi, John 1000-037-07-010.002 Cedar Lane(3345), Southold 08/08/2000 no 11-1-02-6-003-050-1
Cherepowich Family,Lot#2 1000-038.00-01.001.003 Main Road,East Marion 12/13/2000 Existing
main(9/01
Main
Crawley, Colin 1000-038.00-01-026 Shipyard Lane(e/o),East Marion 03/02/2001 Extension
Required
9/01
Vescovi,Holl 1000-038.00-01-026 ShipyardLane East Marion 10/02/2000
04/01/2002 Page 3 of 22
Southold Hardships/Connections Granted by SCWA
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01.01-018 Pheasant Run nit 18),Greenport 09123/1998 02/11/1999 25-1-100-316-980-1
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01-01-019 Pheasant Run nit 19),Greenport 05/06/1998
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01-01-020 Pheasant Run nit 20),Greenport 03/17/1998
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000.040.01-01-021 Pheasant Run(Unit 21 , Greenport 12/08/1998 06/29/1999 25-1-100-316-950-1
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000.040.01-01-022 Pheasant Run nit 22),Greenport 12/08/1998 08/23/1999 25-1-10-0-316-940-1
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01-01-023 Pheasant Run nit 23),Greenport 12/08/1998 04/12/1999 25-1-100-316-930-1
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01-01-024 Pheasant Run nit 24),Greenport 12/08/1998 09/02/1999 25-1-100-316-920-1
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01-01.-025 Pheasant Rim nit 25),Greenport 12/08/1998 04/12/1999 25-1-100-316-910-1
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040:01-01-026 Pheasant Run nit 26), Greenport 12/08/1998 04/12/1999 25-1-100-316-900-1
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01-01-027 Pheasant Run(Unit 27),Greenport 04/01/1998
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01-01-027 Pheasant Run(Unit 27),Greenport 08/21/1998 08/25/1998 25-1-100-316-890-1
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01-01-028 Pheasant Run(Unit 28),Greenport 03/17/1998
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01-01-033 Pheasant Run nit 33),Greenport 09/23/1998 03/25/1999 25-1-10-0-316-830-1
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01-01-034 Pheasant Run nit 34),Greenport 07/20/1998 12/03/1998 25-1-10-0-316-820-1
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000.040.01-01-039 Pheasant Run(Unit 39),Greenport 12/08/1998 01/22/1999 25-1-100-316-770-1
Pheasant Run Condominium 1000-040.01-01-040 Pheasant Run(Unit 40),Greenport 12/08/1998 06/21/1999 25-1-100-316-760-1
Richard Saetta Contracting 1000-040-02-014 County Road 48(66975),Greenport 01/08/2002 Existing
Main 9/02)
Schroeder,Diane 1000-041-01-013 Main Street(150),Greenport 03/12/2002 Existing
Main
Friel,Deborah 1000-043-01-001 Manhansett Avenue(2740),Greenport 09/13/2001 Existing
Main
Chimmici,Donna 1000-043-024140 Bay Road(355),Greenport 03/01/2002 Existing
Main 9/02
Romanelh, John 1000-043-04-033 Wood Lane, Greenport 08/08/2000
Price, William H. 1000-043-05-010 Bay Road(100),Greenport 08/08/2000
Verity,Michael 1000.048-03-042.001 Brown and 9th Streets,Greenport 07/09/1999 03/01/2000 25-1-080-159-500-1
Nickart Realty 1000-052-02-013 North Road, Southold 09/01/2000
Kilican, Antun 1000-052-03-015.000 Wild Cherry Way(630), Greenport 01/22/2001 Existing
main(9/01)
Zoumas Homes Builders 1000-052-03-016 Bayberry Lane, Greenport 09/01/2000
Muscheid, J. 1000-052-03-033 Wild Cherry W (495),Greenport 06/17/1999 10/20/1999 25-1-030-281-500-1
Main
Wisor,Wlodzimierz 1000-052-05-049 Bayview Road,Southold 03/12/2002
Extension
Required ,
9/02
04/01/2002 Page 5 of 22
Southold Hardships/Connections Granted by SCWA
Broderick,Elizabeth 1000-053-05-007 1 Tarpon Drive, Southold 03/12/2001 Existing 1 main J2/01)
Louca,Helen 1000-053-06-027.002 Bay Shore Road, Greenport 08/08/2000
Patane, Giovanni 1000-053-06-027.002 Bay Shore Road,Greenport 03/0212001 Existing
main(9/01
Paradise Isle(4 lot
subdivision) 1000-053-06-046.002 Bayshore Road(w/o), Southold 08/08/2000
Vervemotis,Eliseos 1000-054-03-21.002 Horton's Lane, Southold 09/14/2001 Existing
Main
Vazquez,Don 1000-054-05-001 North Sea Drive, Southold 08/02/2001 Existing
•main 9/01)
On
scheduled
main
Manzi Homes Inc. 1000-054-05-037.002 Soundview Avenue(10505), Southold 06/08/2001 extension 11-3-58-8-186-000-1
(water 9/01
or when
installed if
ater)
Manus,William 1000-054-054146.001 Soundview Avenue(12035),Southold 03/01/2002 Existing
Main
Main
Garms, Steven 1000-054-06-004.001 Rene Drive(425), Southold 09/13/2001 Extension
uired
Schroeder,Robert 1000-054-06-004.003 Rene Drive(150), Southold 08/29/2001 Existing
xisting
main 9/01 •
Main
O'Brien, Joanne 1000-054-07-001.003 Horton Lane, Southold 11/28/2000 Extension
Lane, Southold I mam L9/01
' S Required
9/01
Schupp, Gordon 1000-054-09-020 Maple Road, Southold 09/14/2001 Existing
Main
Bums,Philip J. 1000-055-01-008.001 Old North Road(500),Southold 11/23/19 00 25-1-030-199-500-1
Kerbs,John 4.003 North Road,2Southold 08/08/2000
Kerbs,John 1000-055-03-004.005 North Road, Southold 08/08/2000
Kerbs,John 1000-055-03-004.006 North Road, Southold -68/08/2-000
04/01/2002 Page 7 of 22
Southold Hardships/Connections Granted by SCWA
Kick 1000-057-01-005 Tarpon Drive, Southold 11/22/2000 Existing
g main 9/01
Chilton,Robert H. 1000-057-01-013 Blue Marlin Drive,Southold 08/08/2000
Hartlieb, Jeffrey and Mary Ann 1000-057-01-020 Albacore Drive(435), Southold 11/22/2000 Existing
main 9/01
Glasser,Frederick 1000-059-03-016.004 Chestnut Road,Southold 01/08/2002 Existing
Main 9/02
Luhrs,Jason 1000-059-03-016.005 Chestnut Road,Southold 09/18/2001 Main
Extension
Heard,Peter 1000-059-03-017.004 Kenne3es Road(970), Southold 07/03/2000 09/13/2000 25-1-030-195-500-1
Pfizter,James 1000-059-03-017.005 Kenny's Road(770), Southold 11/09/2001 Existing
Main
Zoumas Home Builders 1000-059-04-005.012 Barley Avenue(265), Southold 08/08/2000 12/06/2000 25-1-010-220-500-1
Manzi Homes Inc. 1000-059-09-016 Soundview Road,Southold 01/11/2002 Existing
Main(9/02)
Dzu as Winery 1000-059-10-006.003 North Road and Tuckers Lane, Southold 03/11/1999
Manzi Homes 1000-062-03-032 Locust Avenue(675), Southold 01/12/2000 25-1-050-240-900-1
Morin,Nicholas 1000.062-03-040 Town Harbor Road,Southold 09/01/2000
Saundra Perry Physical 1000.063-04-003 Main Road(57190), Southold 09/01/2000
Therapy
Novick,Barry 1000.063-04.009 Town Harbor Lane(695), Southold 02/22/2000 02/16/2001 25-1-050-219-500-
Zoumas Contracting Corp. 10004)63-05422 Greenfields Lane(810),Southold 03/06/2002 Existing
Main
d Leavy ,,Kevin 1000-063-07-W Harper Road West(95), Southold 03/24/2000 03/29/2001 25-1-010-290-500-1
Charles,Barry 1000.063-07-014 Peck Place(265), Southold 04/01/1998 08/24/1998 25-1-010-279-500-1
Hughes,Peter 1000-063-07-017.003 West MR Road 1290), Southold 06/11/1998
V
Hughes,Peter J. 1000-063-07-017.003 Southold Gardens Lot 3, Southold 12/08/1998
Arm, Craig 1000-063-07-017.004 Wells Road(1595),Southold 07/30/1999 10/08/1999 25-1-010-277-600-1
Gallanos,Ulysses 1000.064-01-028 Hobart Road 660),Southold 01/12/2000 25-1-020-253-500-1
Edson,Lewis 1000-064-01-032 Hobart Road, Southold 11/22/2000 Existing
ti main(9/01
Manzi Homes 1000.064-02.047 Old Shipyard Road(450),Southold 03/11/1999 04/22/1999 25-1-050-259-500
DeLuca, Charles(4 houses) 1000-066-02-002' Main Road, Cutchogue 09/05/2000
002.001 002.004
Tucker Edward 1000-069-03-006;001 Terry Court 295 Southold 04/01/1998 09/28/1998 25-1-010-199-500-1
04/01/2002 Page 9 of 22
4
Southold Hardships/Connections Granted by SCWA
Main
Brander, Stephen 1000-076-01-010 Bayberry Road,Southold 06/22/2001 Extension
Required
9/01
Main
Brander, Stephen 1000-076-01-011 Bayberry Road, Southold 06/22/2001 Extension
Required
9/01
Main
Brander, Stephen 1000-076-01-012 Sun Lane, Southold 06/22/2001 Extension •
Required
9/01
Main
Brander, Stephen 1000-076-01-014 Sun Lane, Southold 06/22/2001 Extension
Required
9/01
Main
McCaffrey,Patrice 1000-076-01-015.002 North of Main Bayview Road, Southold 06/22/2001 Extension
Required
9/01
Main
McCaffrey, Patrice 1000-076-01-015.003 Sun Lane, Southold 06/22/2001 Extension
Required
9/01
McCaffrey, Patrice 1000-076-01-015.004 Main Bayview Road, Southold 06/22/2001 Existing
main(9/01 •
Main
McCaffrey,Patrice 1000-076-01-015.005 North of Main Bayview Road, Southold 06/22/2001 Extension
Required
9/01
Main
McCaffrey,Patrice 1000-076-01-015.006 North of Main Bayview Road, Southold 06/22/2001 Extension
Required
9/01
Brander, Stephen 1000-076-01-016 Smith Drive, Southold 06/22/2001 Existing
main 9/01
04/01/2002 Page 11 of 22
Southold Hardships/Connections Granted by SCWA
Dart,Edward 1000-078-01-10.023 Main Bayview Road, Southold 11/22/2000 Existing
main 9/01)
Toman,Robert and Susan 1000-078-02-013 Main Bayview Road, Southold 11/22/2000 Existing
main 9/01)
Jacques,Peter 1000-078-02-018.002 Main Bayview Road, Southold 11/22/2000 Existing
main(9/01)
On
scheduled
main
Cortale,Joseph 1000-078-02-039 Glemt Road,Southold 05/07/2001 extension
(water 9/01
or when
installed if
later
Manzi Homes Inc. 1000-078-03-019.001 Nokomis Road(500), Southold 01/09/2002 Existing
Main(9/02)
Hokanson,Richard 1000-078-03-033 Nokomis Road(1635), Southold 07/17/2000 11-1-012-018-400-1
McWilliams,Tim 1000-078-03-036.001 Wabasso Street(345), Southold 06/06/2001 Existing
main 9/01)
Wenchell,Walter 1000-078-03-065 Hiawathas Path(120),Southold 04/26/1999 07/20/1999 11-1-01-2-016-000-1
Grathwohl,James 1000-078-05-016 Wflhamsburg Road,Bayview 08/08/2000
1000-078-06 002Main
,
Piscotta,Robert Windy Point Lane, Southold 09/13/2001 Extension
003.001 (one lot) Required
i
Zebrowski,Estate of Jules 1000-078-07.009 Main Bayview, Southold 09/01/2000
Bishop, Christopher 1000-078-07-032.010 Main Bayview Road, Southold 11/05/2001 Existing
Main
Manzi Homes 1000-078-07-047 Koke Drive, Southold 09/20/2000
Main
Pratt, William 1000-079-02-011 North Bayview Road, Southold 11/28/2000 Extension
Required
9101
Jordan,Thomas 1000-079-04-025 Brigantine Drive, Southold 08/03/2001 Existing
main 9/01)
Guyer, Stephen 1000-079-04-031 Brigantine Drive, Southold 08/02/2001 Existing
main 9/01
X
04/01/2002 Page 13 of 22
Southold Hardships/Connections Granted byGC\8A\Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-08"1-004.021 Richmond Shores,Peconic: 08/15/2000McGuire,Eileen 1000-086-01-010.008 Wells Road(2590),Peconic 08/02/2001 Existing
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-086-01-W4.012 Richmond Shores,Peconic 08/15/2000
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-086-01-004.013 Richmond Shores,Peconic 08/15/2000
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-096-01-004.014 Richmond Shores,Peconic 08/15/2000
Schembn Homes Inc. 1000-086-01-004.015 Richmond Shores,Peconic 08/15/2000
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-086-01-004.016 Richmond Shores,Peconic 08/15/2000
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-086-01-004.017 Richmond Shores,Peconic 08/15/2000
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-086-01-004.018 Richmond Shores,Peconic 08/15/2000
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-086-Ol-W4.019 TUchmond Shores,Peconic 08/15/2000
Schembri Homes Inc. 1000-086-01-004.020 Richmond Shores,Peconic 08/15/2000
Hessell, Christina 1000-086-04-001.004 State Route 25 11/22/2000 Existing
main 9/01)
Main
Moore, William 1000-086-04-006.003 Indian Neck Lane,Cutchogue 05/23/2001 Extension
Required
Main
Hamparian,Michael 1000-086-04-006.007 Indian Neck Road(1570),Peconic 03/1212001 Extension
Required
Pefikas,Theodore 1000-087-03-011 Mumehaha Boulevard, Southold 05/07/2001 Existing
Jones, Alexandra 1000-087-03-032 Minnehaha Boulevard(2885), Southold 09/13/2001 Existing
Main
Piscotta,Anthony, Whitmore, 1000-087-05-023.007
Andrea (I house) and 023.008 Main Bayview Avenue,Southold 12/03/1999
Middleton,Kevin 1000-087-05-023.010 Main Bayview Road, Southold 12/08/1998
Kirsch,Mary 1000-087-05-024 Main Bayview Road(9720), Southold 01/12/2000
Edson,Lisa 1000-087-05-025 Main Bayview Road, Southold 09/0w000
Deerfield farm(4 lot
subdivision)/McCarthy 1000-08"1-001 Main Bayview Avenue,Cutchogue 10/02/2000
Akscin,Raymond(lot#1 bam - Existing
1000-OSM2-017.004 Main Bayview Road, Southold 03/12/2001 9/01P
converted to house) main(9/01)
04/O1/2OU2 � 150f22
Southold Hardships/Connections Granted by SCWA
O'Clair,Dennis 1000-097-03-011,008 Skunk Lane,Cutchogue 11/22/2000 Existing
main 9/01)
Rogers,Robert 1000-097-07-012 Beebe Drive(655),Cutchogue 06/06/2001 Existing
main 9/01)
Main
Cichanowicz,David 1000-097-10-002 Leslie Road,Southold 01/03/2001 Extension
(subdivision into 2 lots) Required
(9/01)
Cdkrelli,Richard(barn 1000-102-03-010 Main Road, Southold 03/13/2001 Existing
converted to house) main(9/01)
1000-103-01-019.002 Existing
Peconic Bay Winery and 019.011 (fire line Main Road, Southold 01121/2001 main(9/01)
and 11/2 domestic
Ryan,Douglas 1000-103-04-002 Beebe Drive(3hogue main 210)Extension, 08/02/2001 Existi(910
ng
Cutc1)
Wolf,Jeffrey 1000-103-04-046 Beebe Drive(2985),Cutchogue 07/03/2000 09/25/2000 11-3-58-0-305-500
Ryan,Carolann&Douglas 1000-103-09-002 Beebe Drive(3710), Cutchope 09/23/2000
Kerensky, William 1000-103-10-002.003 Baldwin Place(145), Cutchogue 01/08/2002 Existing
in
Main 9/02)
Frerking,Richard 1000-104-01-020 Lilac Lane, Southold 11/08/2001 Existing
Main
1000-104-02-007.001, Main
Romeo Subdivision
007.002,007.003, Bittersweet Lane, Cutchogue 01/03/2001 Existing
007.004,007.006(4 lois Required
I ROW) (9/01)
DiDomenico,Robert 1000-104-03-005.003 Pine Tree Road(2655),Cutchogue 02/16/2001 Existing
main 9/01)
Kelly,Barbara 1000-104-04-029.000 Bay Avenue,Cutchogue 01/22/2001 Existing
main(9/01)
Arm, Craig 1000-104-05-M Skunk Low(7000),Cutchogue 10/16/2000
Frenz,Thomas 100b 104-09-004.002 Broadwatess Road(1260),Cutchogue 06/06/2000 11-3-07-7-086-000
AGM Associates 1000-104-10-005 Broadwaters Road, Cutchogue 02/16M0I Existing
main(9/01)
Lang,Gerald 1000-104-11-013 Wunneweta.Road,Lot 297,Cutchopic 1 08/1612000
04/01/2002 Page 17 of 22
Southold Hardships/Connections Granted by SCWA
Corrected
8/8/00 letter
Reynolds,Richard 1000-106-09.007.007 Luthers Road,Matutuck 08/09/2001 to 7.6 to
correct lot
7.7
Main
Carter, B,Fred 1000-106-09-008.001 West Mill Road(1505),Mattituck 05/07/2001 Extension
Required
9/01
Bartolotto,Joseph 1000-106-09-010.001 West Mill Road(1065),Mattituck 03/06/2002 Existing •
Main
On
scheduled
Romano,Anthony000-107-08-034 Brower main
y Road Mattituck 08/08/2001
extension
(water when
installed
Inland Homes, Inc. 1000-110-03-031 Fleets Neck Road,Cutchogue 09/13/2001 Existing
main
Main
Snow,Michael and Phyllis 1000-110-04-012.002 Hamilton Avenue, Cutchogue 02/21/2001 Extension
Required
9/01
Main
Marino,Norman and Barbara 1000-110-08403 Grathwohl Lane,Cutchogue 01/03/2001 Extension
Required •
9/01
Gleason,Tom 1000-1104)8-034 New Suffolk Road(5115),New Suffolk 03/01/2002 Existing
Main 9/02
Paterno,Michael 1000-111-03-010 Vanston Road,Nassau Point 08/08/2000
Triolo,Louis 1000-111-04-005 Wunneweta Road,Cutchogue 10/12/2000
Beck, Victor 1000-111-04-019 Old Mendenhaden Road, Southold 05/07/2001 Existing
main(9/01
Severin, Anthony1000-111-04-019 Old Menhaden Road, Southold 07/17/2000
November,Charles 1000-111-04-024 Wunneweta Road(1700),Cutchogue 11/22/2000 Existing
main 9/01
04/01/2002 Page 19 of 22
Southold Hardships/Connections Granted by SCWA
Mahoney,Myles 1000-117-06-014.001 Grathwohl Lane(385),Cutchogue 01/12/2002
Existing
Main 9/02
Schmidt,Edward 1000-117-06-016.004 New Suffolk Avenue,New Suffolk 10/12/2000
Main
Belvedere Property 1000-117-08-020 First Street,New Suffolk 11/08/2001 Extension
Management Required
9/02
Main
Polashock,Joseph 1000-117-09-026 Second Street,New Suffolk 09/13/2001 Extension
Required
Kilbride,David 1000-118-04-014.001 Nassau Point Road,Cutchogue 09/01/2000
Wendell,Jonathan 1000-119-01-014.002 Smith Road,Cutchogue 01/03/2001 Existing
main 9/01)
Premium Wine Group 1000-121-06-001 Cox Neck Road,Mattituck 05/11/2000 09/07/20011 11-3-07-4-009-100-1
Cardinale,Allan(4 lot 1000-122-03-001.004 Main Road, Cutchogue 10/02/2000 02/10/2000 11-3-56-2-005-405-1
subdivision, 2 existing homes) 11-3-56-2-005-415-1
James Creek Const. Co. 1000-122-03-025.002 Private Road,Mattituck 03/01/2002 Existing
Main 9/02
Guerrara, Salvatore and JoAnn 1000-122-04-044.006 Old Jule Lane(1450),Mattituck 01/11/2001 Existing
main(9/01)
Linakes, Steven 1000-122.09-007.018 Freh Road,Mattituck 08/08/2000
Zoumas Homes Builders 1000-125-04-0113 Delmar Drive(3755),Laurel 07/03/2000 10/05/2000 11-3-07-2-400-720-1
Conrad,Peter 1000-126-02-011 Albo Drive(595),Laurel 08/02/2000 02/09/2001 11-3-07-2-406-045-1
Martz,Theodore 1000-126-03-008 Albo Drive(1250),Laurel 11/08/2001 Existing
Main
Mattituck Park District 1000-126.06-017 and Pecomc Bay Boulevard,Mattituck 04/11/2001 Exii sti9ng
Mangiamele, Vincent 1000-126-07-031 Bray Avenue,Laurel 11/08/2001 Existing
Main(9/02)
O'Connor Clarke 1000-126-08-025 Wells Road 1155),Laurel 07/09/1999 10/14/1999 11-3-07-2-406-355-1
Silleck Map of Golden View Estates,(Lot 6)
Mary&Charles 1000-127 09 006 Lail 07/17/2000
Manzi Homes Inc. 1000 128-03-012.004 Peconic Bay Boatavard(3495),Laurel 10/12/2000 02/16/2001 11-3-07-2-400-000
Great Peconic Bay Boulevard(1025),
Zilz, William 1000-124-01 005 Laurel 08/08/2000 I1-1-07-1-300-485-1
04/0112002 Page 21 of 22
Subdivisions-Water Service Applications
3 lot
subdivision, 1
Main Road 09/17/2001 Demonstrate water supply impact building lot, 1
Niamonitakis 1000-031-06-028.001 East Marion 01/11/02 Approved for two connections in 19.44 buffer lot to
9/02 existing home,
1 farm with
building lot
• Papson, Vicky 1000-031-13-007 Main 06/22/2001 Demonstrate water suMarionpply impact 5.43 3 Existing home,-two to
be built On
Summit S/ rag
01/03/2001 Demonstrate water supply act
Estates, Sec. R 1000-035-08-7 Road,
d,,East pP y tm P 23 25
&III Marion 12/19/01 Approval for 25 connections
Horton's Lane, 3 acre setoff to
Conway 1000-054-07-021.001 Southold 09/17/2001 Demonstrate water supply impact 34 create 1
buildin lot
Bayberry 1000-055-06-035,036 Laurel 18 lots, 32
Estates and 056-01-001 Avenue, 09/18/2001 Demonstrate water supply impact 50.0609 acres open
Southold s ace
1000-056-1-11.001 and N/s Main 7 building lots
Ernst,Edward 1000-056-03-013.003 Road, 08/08/2001 Demonstrate water supply impact 83.91 2 farm land
Southold preserves
Main Road 1000-063-004-005.001 Southold
Mara Road'
Townhouses Demonstrate water supply impact 1.1 12 townhouses
•
Doroski S/s Soundview 3 building
Family L.P. 1000-069-01-009 Avenue, 08/20/2001 Demonstrate water supply impact 39.7 lots, 1 farm
Southold land preserve
Harvest Demonstrate water supply impact
Homes, 1000-070-03-022 Oaklawn Ave, 01/03/2001 Approval for 13 connections, of 15 13
Section 2 Southold 12/13/01 which 2 requiring main extension
in 9/02
04/01/2002 Page 1 of 2
6 – Traveler Warchazaa–Thursday,September 20,2001
"at Gives at P
By Chr dua Spelser the CPPC has not yet received a re-
it seems that practically every little sponse.
creek or waterway in Southold Town This property, as designated on the
has a community group watching over town's map, is an area targeted for
it, and Pipes Creek, which ties on the preservation. Southold's Land Preser-
south side of the North Fork in Green- vation Coordinator Melissa Spiro said
port, is no exception. that the town would like to purchase
The Committee to Preserve Pipes property in the area for preservation,
Creek(CPPC),which is over 50 mem but notes that the program is voluntary
bers strong,is seriously concerned with and cannot happen without the owner's
the environmental effect that a proposed support.
minor subdivision would likely have on The town's Local Waterfront Revi-
the environmentally sensitive wetland talization Plan (L.WRP) reveals some
area of Pipes Creek. interesting information that states that
Despite the environmental concerns, while the coastal waters of Pipes Cove Mkhow CoWrawe wowwten
a minor subdivision located on a 12Yz are certified for shellfish harvesting,
acre piece of land owned by the Milazzo Moore's Drain,which feeds into Pipes land sloping down toward the water, on the site.
Family LLC has been proposed for this Cove,has shown elevated levels of fe- cesspools could not be placed above However,Michael LoGrande,Chair-
fragile area.The proposal includes three cal coliform bacteria,especially follow- the house. If they were placed below man of the Suffolk County Water Au-
separate lots,which would each include ing excessive rainfalls. It also suggests the house, the committee argues thatthori vehementl di
a two-story home. Two of these lots that the potential for flooding in Reach the waste would be too close to the explained nod rhas been
would also have an inground pool and 6, which includes Pipes Creek, is sig- water and would contaminate the at. an attorney at the Water Authority for
on Lot #3 a studio near the water has nificant and extensive. Another fact" ready envimnmentallyendangered pipes six years and that he would normally
been proposed noted is that flood insurance is not avail- (geek, handle these requests for water in now
In the first quarter of this year,title able for any new construction or sub- The committee also questions subdivisions. In this case, LoGrande
to the property was transferred from starrtially improved structures built on Milazzo's political influence and is con- stated that Milazzo immediately came
the Posillico family of Westbury to the or after November 16, 1990. cemed that it might open doors which to him and told him about his parent's
Milazzos for a reported selling price of The committee argues that this prop- would allow him to build on what they proposed subdivision.He told LoGtande
$110,000. erty cannot be built without variances always felt was a non-buildable lot."We that he would have no contact with the
The group first took action by send- for setbacks that are currently much believe that there is improp ' " ate case and would not discuss it at work
ing the New York State Department of smaller than those required. They also me f the committee One of the or with his parents. LUGrande stated
State an application in which they norm- contend that without these variances; concerns they have is that lazzo's sot, that John Milazzo is a highly respected
nated the arca as a significant coastal the yield would only allow enough space John Milazzo, is an attorney for the employee and he does not want to see
and wildlife habitat. The application, to build something the size:.of an out- Suffolk County Water Authority him hurt by any allegations of impro- _
wluch has the support of the North Fork house. That leads to another problem (SCWA)and they fear that this will push
Audubon Society was sent in July,but —the sanitary septic system. With the through the Milazzos' need for water see Croo Page 20A
(CPV'E�
1
T rT
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport, New York 11944
(631)477 3608
MAY 0 3 2002
May 1, 2002 -.out old Town
Board
MEMBERS: Timothy Cooke
George&.lean Betzios
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Darlene Capobianco 625 Broadway
Frank&Gina Chimop Albany, New York 12233-1750
Anthony&Jeannine Contino
Irene&Tom Costas
Lisa &Ty Costas
Tom&Jenn Costas Ref: MILAZZO FAMILY LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION
K.C. Coughlin
Barbara Dai APPLICATION # 1-4738-02483100001
Padre& Rich DelVecchio DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 53 BLOCK 1 LOT 9
Christine Durkin
Jennifer Durkin
Mary Ann Durkin
Jean Eckardt Dear Mr. Cooke,
Edward Flynn
Fortunato P. &Valerie Foti
Ignatia E. Foti Enclosed are documents, prepared by Division for Historic
Jeff Goubeaud Preservation, New York State Parks and Recreation. These
Dennis& Kathleen Green
C Doug Hardy documents either directly ( ) or through
see section GR4 h
Betty Hintze references in narratives and maps (see other sections) confirm
Henry Hintze the existence and location of the 5 Wigwams. The significance
Al li Sue Homan of this Native American cam and council meeting site is clear.
Julia 8 Timothy Kilcullen P g
Kristin Kliernann Proposed construction on Lot 3 of the above cited subdivision
Patricia Lauth application will result in the permanent obliteration of this
Deborah Lindsay archeologically g g
Lynn Mastnota Og� y si n�Cant site. Construction and round
Steven Minervini disturbance on Lots 1 and 2 will seriously impact it.
Dennis Palumbo
Aidan& Eileeneilly Furthermore, the documents report the location and
Steven (Larry) Reiter p0
Eleanor&Fred Rempe significance of the Corwin-Pekunke House. The wetlands behind
Rick Rempe that house drain into Pipes Creek direct) through the building
Angela Rich � y 9 9
William Russack envelope on Lot 3. The stream (which passes through a culvert
Brian& Maryanne Russell under the Long Island Rail Road tracks) is one of the two
Eric Sweeting Po
Kathleen MTole streams that we have reported is still not on the Milazzo survey-
Olga
Olga M. Tole Altering or obstructing the flow of that stream will result in
wetland intrusion directly into the historic house.
You will also note the earlier presence of a brick works on
this property. The brickworks was located there because of the
clay composition of the ground. This soil composition exists to this day and,
despite a recent drilling report, would preclude drainage for waste management.
We request that this information be forwarded along with Mr. Milazzo's
archeology report to the appropriate agency for their comments.
We anticipate your support in denying the proposed subdivision
application.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
CC: Governor George E. Pataki
Hillary Rodham Clinton, US Senator
Felix J. Grucci, Jr., Member of Congress
Kenneth P. LaVaile, NYS Senator
Patricia L. Acampora, NYS Assemblywoman
Erin M. Crotty, Commissioner, NYS DEC
William Adriance, Chief Permit Administrator, NYS DEC
Robert J. Gaffney, Suffolk County Executive
Joshua Horton, Supervisor, Town of Southold
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board
Val Scopaz, Senior Planner
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Chairman, Town Trustees
Richard C. Ryan, Chairman, Land Preservation Committee
Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Officer
Nancy Lucas, The Nature Conservancy
Gwynn Schroeder, North Fork Environmental Council
Suffolk Times
Traveler Watchman
(!D Clltj
O r�
Q err �
N
I�:f
III
-r
Art � o
eoo� I
i
�I
E
,
'Y
�i
�I
�cZl � E2s
M
'1
LUIVIi Jb LAIVu iI �btt-L/l ` `.• •,�-un
GREENPORT al ♦ 7 GR-26
� �. a' s
SOUND
. y r
1988 GR 22 GR-24
GR-14 : I /,.• . zENVIRONS *W R-23 5 `M ^? .ti;•.•�, (.,b,r.
T A.4r
(Outside incorporatedGR-12 GR-13A I �•;t e N�� �_ _°a.`
G
viIlage ' •o!, .� .� 'o . V
GR-11 R-13. t
GR-10
NYS DOT COMPOSITE rt=
SOUTHOLD AND
GREENPORT QUADS r', ;• Y• _ /
GR-9 es Pt
s
'. Y t a AI O. A
tp
a ar.9p III�� . l eo GR-28 .
Puwr Rock"';
l'; �. 1" /' "�8�rf' •.•
SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION w �� i" ,:°�'Jver Iked)nay it :.} Hay
1 .� , ••'
OF LONG ISLAND ANTIQUITIES !• '• P .• a -- oune s Pl
H ( D
9) NORTH ROA0orros GtA 1 z5 , ••C') a r% -
ExI
SEIAURLT • L()NG ISI..\Nll. Nf.% VORR • 11733 P9 20
•'•. . 1 � start ", •' G GR-15, 16, 17, 1 2l .
•�
Pill
Dlsoastl S r
R .
y� or N "17 t i
1 Io .
Tncw� • .QO ,
' i. X0_...1 •• ' PO '
GR-8A ;� n
Rlut Uplo
1•� j e
GR-8 4 4 - _ gai9 R 111
25
0 \zs c l'
• ' L N 1 I ° Gi1a I /� `° •(��
Deivtin T9 Ti''^ .� / ir •' � ai�
Tholer 8� - � CI I ♦' Ira' •�;�
• Sub bl-on !.� n • �, I , •�. ,i
•pt o f, i r` _ _ ,1 &Llrhls 33'' D link¢{ • . •�:
•�0 _ Y- .91�'t.1 /7oIIMc.; I / " '+I�.��• S C
f F
25 .'; r i • � 3.r • pering Itrborso
�mn ng
\�
6 b ' •�
lot
,`
GR-7A / tt r Dering i,
, s ' \ _ 'r tPee i 'wr� 1
LANt.e.
GR-5 GR-7Harbor t
• �' t tm % - - +�, I Chequll • ld of Iht Isle
CO Our Lt
/l Pl
GR-3 GR-4 al CI40
Im
>�4 •� _ .. / / ;A , hl Clwb t est n
GR-2 m GR-( n i
E`h11A EM 11EM- -
1�' EM-58 .� �
� EM-59 i/l hrrc �i.
EM-c5-
r Guo
' en v12 � ri�?`"y,\ �� V ��/ Fy3d\ �. � r +^' t yl ij �� �� 'I --L^, —/'7 ✓� f� G'L�7 " Q� 'P
_M
IN
I i
r
I'
A
Ey
1-
A - M
EM 7' 3 �y `---�� `'T `�� 40 i`• IOWN OF
-60
E"1 6' iii STORIG
EM-
_ _ � — — `� ° �z � s6 EAEM
ST
�\ EM-a9
EM 54
Fd.�_g F ��� �- Q _ �, EM-46 EM-52
E M_ O.
Q
FN_2 / t'- � 1\ /�', � I V I i�1:���. `� _�. �4 .,h 43 _i G�.IPOniTE
pr"-' -
r_"c Lksfl
�LTPOLK
1'7EM-40
EM-38
I
J
r
s
EM-37
-�� l I J T.-✓li ,c:/%�—r✓ ,C�.-w.- I' J ���'� ���\� � o �r,� ` 4 .;5 i N,JG 1_36
� 0, Or Lurvt.
�l ••'�� C � - � � \ter\\J � _ _ 2F _
JJ \
� ♦ \T�1 i[ KE
I C 1 � ��� �f ` \ 211' I
x
le
=� _ —----X1.5 -
_ _
_ EM-1A --- --
• • GR 1
HISTORIC AND NATURAL DISTRICTS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
INVENTORY FORM
UNIQUE SITE NO.
DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION QUAD.
NEW YORK STATE PARKS AND RECREATION. SERIES _
ALBANY,NEW YORK (518)474-0479 - _ NEG. NO. .
YOUR NAME: Town of Southold/SPLIA DATE: March 198 _
YOUR ADDRESS: Town Hall . Main Road TELEPHONE:516 76S-1899
Southold , L . I . , N .Y . 11971
.. O!RGANIZATION (if any): Southold Town CQmmunity CommunityDpyelon ent oEfiro
M
I. NAME OF DISTRICT: The Unincorporated Area of C nport
2. COUNTY:Suffolk TOWN/CITY: Southold VILLAGE:f roan nrf
u
3. DESCRIPTION: The unincorporated sections of Greenport are covered
in this survey . These surround the incorporated Village of
Greenport on the west , north and east . The area is bounded on
the north by Long Island Sound , on the west by the vicinage called
Ashamomaque, on the south by Gardiners Bay, and on the east by
East Marion . The terrain is relatively flat , sloping gently from
the sound shore bluffs on the north to the marshes and inlets of
the southern shore .
The only through east-west artery is the north road which
¢ is CR. 48 in the western half of the area and becomes N .Y , State
" Route 25 in the east part of the area . The railroad coming from
New York follows the southern side of the peninsula terminating at
4. SIGNIFICANCLge of Greenport which is 95 miles from Brooklyn .
While the Village of Greenport is a mid-19th century village ,
in the surrounding area there are found earlier structures . The
vicinage along the north road , which was the original Kings Highway,
g was the original hamlet called Sterling . The Young/Coyle house is
the earliest house found here (GR 21) When Greenport became an
important port with a profitable whaling industry, Brecknock Hall
was built , reportedly with whaling profits (GR 23) Prior to the
arrival of the railroad in 1844 , the main land route through the
area was the Kings Highway which was marked at intervals by mile-
stones (GR 8 , GR 13a, GR 28) . In 1874 R. M. Bayles reported that
there were many German families living in this immediate neighbor-
hood .
5. MAP:
ke*�
sF
a ��£
w,
HP-2
Y s:
6. SOURCES: Greeport, Yesterday and Today. Elsie Knapp Corwin and•'
Frederick Langton Corwin. - 1972 '-`
Historical and Descriptive Sketches of Suffolk County.';
Richard M. Bayles, 1874.
Griffin's Journal. Augustus Griffin, 1857
U. S . Coast Survey. T-55 . 1838
f
7 . THREATS,TO AREA —
BY ZONING ❑ BY ROADS ❑ BY DEVELOPERS 5P
BY DETERIORATION 0 _ OTHER
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
. .. .._ . gyp •)"t- _ _ 7 .._.>T.C . ::r' ,, . . .•. . . `.�
8. LOCAL`- ATTITUDES TOWARD THE' AREA:
.. .. . �r ..:.,
-q PHOTOS:
i
s
^Fx`
ra
.ter...
TOWNOF SOUTH3LD HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEY`
LONG ISLAND ;p GR 25,.•• `•D.GR 27)�' . :' 3�. * ti•.,
—G REEN PORT '�` a . r' ke
SOUND i '., J
1 GR-26
1988 GR-22 GR-24 ,. �. z5 �•` >p"s ,3 '.
ENVIRONS GR-14 as ��� ,�..; c'.,
i • •, N 1
(Outside incorporated GR-12 GR-13A '• �+ ~'i.
village) GR-11 ' '� ••,. •9�; B . S''o •
GR-13. ,e
NYS DOT COMPOSITE GR-10'
SOUTHOLD AND •Q• ;� • CCC o �.
GREENPORT QUADS f. ;• - /
GR-9 •.r: • leaves Pt
GR-28
ICIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION 1' ° 1'• i1ver e� } H+)
OF LONG ISLAND ANTIQUITIES !; — nd t
'• a w ' • y 9• ounes Pt i
7)N,ON(; ISLAN(OUNTD.
N ROAD $ ( dk .sa, ppeas EI(1' 25 eO4! s e
I IAl4(!T • L(IN(: Iti1.AN U, N):N' YORK . IIU) f • / '
1 A se.ase ", •'�, G GR-15, 16, 17, 19 20 21 .+�
• ow M • Pilq
•' 1 . � Rae. f ;/ <
LightPO
iracY o
GR-8A al .'' ':.� —.1 -UT
l
•e �otb
GR-8 i'ti
s) �• y�.� A° y� _ 25 0229 R
r. e
13
Theale. `t1'ZZ ''— ; _ , I• R41%
Sub talion - 1 fy �.�n • ! 1 ac'. /•�•� •s;\,
•4pe1 , 'o- •`:i .' rf� _ .. �. 81.1aryls it ' D fin • • • , ''d
//• 4 ,.ii Vit: ilolll'y'. J. r♦ Tatwel
19
pe„6e arboi A
• a ' ' •� 'i' ;%' 10-
• '� �+ i '+ — n ng So
ae fa • ',\ .
t ,.
p a9°S 0` i ea
a° OGR-7A /S a Dering i. _ I\
•, " o' . r1A5
Nr Y GR— ✓ rJ
` GR-7 4 Harbor
Co /�/ .y�:Y 1 Pt eQ YIt ,Out tJe)of the Isle
'a r GR-3 GR-4 / 15esch C1' t r Gem ,
'r4 '\ = . �I • _ ':� / • s s • chi Club l 't 'aoO
- ' - — — • M• I r its$
'; a i.'�yc ZHFfl[, � wa'�x ,•axCco sn•x•'�. �
+. L
'Q
Nc
O ISLAND
n `• •
3
f• f5 ' Y r.• .. - J/ SOUND �• 1 t•'+,' 0`a ,.,t• +++ '. .
25
99
t ++ °4. 62T
N .Y . S . DOT Inlet Pt ��.+# % �+ }+.:+• � ' •� .. +
Composite Y �.d• n'JtIl�IR + h11ing
-• S. r . .
Southold and (� : : ► 25 urs e� 1 °.�F: -
O
Greenport quads . SI :, ?L 9.• :' '� ++ .,• /• s' /
y • leaves Pt
to .� •: �M S <``•±fICaL`
Parkt Rocki w: + 1" fired Ill r �r+tyt, • : I
., r u, e, .�••.•'Jtdvel• � . 'r ..� Hay f
'o. a f �•� Lake anCy
i a Dora
at n 1; . @••'•-•� oungs Pt
RTN ,n
r ••'+ sewaea •t V
1 'Disooset ,_� y�
i , J ' • ow H •+: Piles %
1 t
Race , e Lieht-
••q• Track t•. •i i O / I
PO % 440
n unlO
Blue .�•\, \ I §oh • . �0 A4
N a, ;� yam.., ee _ �'' _ _ _ 8229• R114 /
A a '1 d /io
J a• '\ 13 ,t•' I
/1 r Drive-in al• •�� I ,;'' �l\
Theaterg229 1 -1
Sub ULon
3'
•w -':.i ' %' t 1 i• i4t �,+ _ ..:�1 1.. Llahb �I ' n t>. • e „a . � a.
8 D n g
-'• 1 T'_� •r'+ • ^�••: PI/Je+ I y, / /... ..• TOWI
25
1. s>f •.•� •' • �• '�••? J+'fl // • PP•CUig arbor F.
e @•. _+� "^ a pion ng / m
AaquR.0 1 s 1•
w ^ — ►'y n / 4tf a Dering •. .1
tea o®e::u+E Pipes
✓ t! i :---,1 - -
�: - -" (/
Harbo
r t,.
' e' 'a • =.• .►• J / as 4 i.. �,,,...�!•'..
•+4 + Cove // r P!etluit ,Our Lady o1 the Isle
/ •` •oh Cl u t em J
cf � ' _ ' • % /a / t a • t!)�cht Club J aeE 'oo
°�° •� ''4 st+tsfiO
ti 114 • PP0 i yI
�� _ l - •.. 7 M• • i't.pf+i INYHR .•n �� I I
ff>:• - _ -
BUILDING-STRUCTURE INTORY FORM FOR OFFICE UNLY GR 2
h' DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION UNIQUE SITE N0.
NEW YORK STATE PARKS AND RECREATION QUAD
SERIES t
ALBANY,NEW YORK (51 R) 474-0479 NEG. NO.
YOUR NAME:TOWri Of SOuthold/SPLIA DATE: SPrtpmYpr lQA7
YOUR ADDRESS:TOwn Hall Main Rnad TELEPHONE:( 51 A) 765_l gQ9
{a
� •_ Southold , L.I . , N. Y. 11971-
") - ORGANIZATION (if any): Southold Town Community Demel nimpnt nffi ne i `.
• f
IDENTIFICATION
1. BUILDINGNAME(S): 'James Corwin hmrap '
2. COUNTY: Suffolk TOWN/CITY: Sonthnld VILLAGE: Greennnrtt
7;3. STREET LOCATION: Pipe Np(-k Rnad , agat side (Uni ncOlMorated )
4. OWNERSHIP: a. public ❑ b private
PRESENT OWNER: Mitchell ADDRESS: sAmp
'.::6. USE: Original Present: reaidpnrp
y "7. ACCESSIBILITY TO PUBLIC Exterior visible from public road: Yes 1 No ❑ t
Interior accessible: Explain
DESCRIPTION
X. BUILDING a. clapboard ❑ b. stone ❑ - c, brick ❑ d. board and batten ❑
ti MATERIAL: : e. cobblestone ❑ f. shingles ®r'g. stucco ❑ other:
-. 9. STRUCTURAL, a. wood frame with interlocking joints
SYSTEM: b. wood frame with light members ❑
(if knave) - c. masonry load bearing walls ❑
d. metal (explain)
e. other -
k .
10. CONDITION: a. excellent ❑ b. good E c. fair ❑ d. deteriorated ❑
{ r-
11. INTEGRITY: a. original site ❑ b. moved ❑ if so,when?
c. list major alterations and dates (if known):
Dormer added . Modern shingles. Stoop not original.
This was originally a "salt-box" . "
G —RSM-M- -23
12. PHOTO: From north west 13. MAP: N.Y.S. , DOT Southold Quad
ont (west) facade and
� s:north elevation.
s a "} SII(• v �
m
_ Thin
eat
� " •.' � Theater
Sob lation ;
L Ilk
35 _
]- -. O
a
;. �F I •A r� a� _ i
_ opaque'.0
( �J _ P(
�o'b iLAN_E
k 1::17' •-rte r� .,i�
a• oCem - ¢p .r
• t o '' � s
GR '2
"nG 1�e
14. THREATS TO BUILDING: ai none knownU b.zoning❑ c. roads ❑
- d. developers ❑ ,-e. deterioration El -
f. other"
15. RELATED OUTBUILDINGS AND PROPERTY:
a. barn 91 b. carriage house ❑ c- garage ❑ -
d. privy ❑ ' e. shed ❑ f. greenhouse ❑ t i.,,
g. shop ❑ . h. gardens❑ .,+Ks-� �
i.landscape features:
I. other:Fine Fnglish-style barn
IG. SURROUNDINGS OF THE BUILDING (check more than one if necessary)-
a.
ecessary)a.open land MI b. woodland ❑- :g)A
c. scattered buildings+
d.densely built-up ❑ e. commercial ❑
r+-
f. industrial ❑ g. residential ❑
It.other.: f
17. INTERRELATIONSHIP OF BUILDING AND SURROUNDINGS: t
(Indicate if building or structure is in an historic district) ° i Rye ti.
Pine Neck Road is a low density lane on which this is the
only historic house . The_ road leads to the bay and wq F
marshes with a- small bridge connecting to marshes on- the
west.
18. OTHER NOTABLE FEATURES OF BUILDING AND SITE (including interior features if known) ,
12-story, '3-bay, center entrance , gable roof house.
1-story gable roof wing on north., 2/2 windows.
SIGNIFICANCE
19. DATE OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION: Prior to 1814i
ARCHITECT:
BUILDER:
20. HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE:
A plaque reads: "James Corwin House pre 1814
'Prior period origin
. Later period changes"
Although this early house has been altered , it is of
historic significance . It was Lenox on 1909 map, and
Corwin on the 1873 ,map.
Beers , Comstock, Cline. Atlas of Lon Island , 1873
E. Belcher Hyde. Atlas of Suffol 1oun y�G.I .
21. SOURCES: Vol,2 : North Side ,- Sound Shore , 1909.
Guide to Historic Markers. Southold Historical
Society. 1960. No. 2
Joy Bear, Historic Houses of the North Fork and
Shelter Isl!jnd . Greenpo_r_f__17811_.7-'7o. 31
Guide to Historic -Markers. Southold Historical
Society. .1960. No. 2; age 9
Form prepared by Rosemary Skye Moritt, research assistant. -
illi �Fk
f
� VV g
SHA'MOMAQUE MAP ABSHAMOMAQUE,
(HASHAMOMACK)
xw
NOTE: The Old Houses and Buildings bearing Historic Markers
and the Properties designated by Roadside Site Markers are not
open for public historical lnspectlon unless otherwise stated.
y r
(1) HASHAMOMACK
loac ISLBNDSOUNO. OLD FAMILIES' BURYING GROUND
Many of the 17th, 18th, and 19th Century Settlers are at rest
k Tq in the earliest part of this cemetery, one of the ancient family
ego l9weburial places in Southold Town.
o «er IF Oldest of the stones now found are marked 1739. .
S Earlier unmarked graves probably exist.
�� a a° (Location of Roadside Marker: Albertson's Lane, Arshamo-
u maque, in front of the old part of the cemetery.)
2. JAMES CORWIN HOUSE PRE 1814
-mat ping Prior Period Origin
F; swe "� Later Period Changes
a X x (Adam Pukunka, Pipes Neck Lane, Arshamomaque)
Frri X/gr+ams The first Corwin house in Hashamomack was originally I
� a "Saltbox" and can be much older than 1814. Descended from
8�. f-,/ ` the first Matthias, James Corwin, a miller at Joseph C. Al-
s , married Poll
Fona P/PEs Y Appleby, daughter d bertson' MillA leb of Mahala
cove Conklynge and the John Appleby who came to America after
the Revolution with John Paul Jones. This house is on lands
THc Bey which were inherited from "Longhouse John Conklynge." The
y homestead of Mahala and John Appleby was at the end of
+^c Pipes Neck Lane on the site of the present Alfred and Mary
(Corwin) Homan home, part of once widespread, family lands. i
f This is a Neck rich in earliest local history. The Great
ac-
Pine Swamp and the Five Wigwams where much Indian eat
lace were
ick-
yyardwad Counear by. took Pipes (barrels largerere. The Osman than hogsheads)$were
made on Pipes Neck and were used for transporting whale oil,
rum, sugar, and molasses. The historic Hashamomack school-
house (built of wood) now an empty house, stands at the
south-west corner of Pipes Neck Lane and the Main Road,
i
having had several movings. Buttermilk Hill a few rods west-
erly on the Main Road, was one of its last sites, given from
Albertson lands. The Hashamomack Burying Ground, old part
s e
z '
Guide to Historic Markers. Southold Historical Society. 1960 N
as Ibe earliesl legal reference to this
t1 Jf area. In it James Farrell deeds to
,^\ / Richard Jackson 'ffifty acres-cas1ward
of he plaee commonly called ffice
r ,qu,cams" This same area, straddling
the railroad tracks today, is still re- Paul Jones to America after the Het
membered as the Great Pine Swamp, lionary War.This house stands on
although the woods today are predomim inherited by the family from 'Longh
army oak. John Cocklynge."
r
In the earliest history of Southold Mr. and Mrs. Mitchell Pekunka.
„I Town, a 60-acre field east of Yennicott present owners, moved into the h
�.
,an Indian name for Southold) was immediately after their wedding.
divided between European settlers for manyyears thereafter Mr.Pekunka
farmland. Indians of the area were a herd of cows on his 14-acre pas
moved out and relocated to the east, on behind the house, part of which
Pipes Neck, Arshamomaque. However, within the historic Five Wigwams
coopers of the day soon discovered the He also farmed nearby acreage,ar
n
••• "• ��" ° ^ " ' ^"
high quality
( e y Pipes tillingfound man Indian arrowh
t"..e.I " Neck, whch madexcellent barrels... •
and a few stone axes and other artif,
and the Indians were relocated again. Mrs.Pekunka isa member of the die
JI department of Eastern Long ft
Hospital.
In whaling days,and earlier, 'pipes'
Corwin-Pekunka House barrels larger than hogsheads h were
made in Arshamnfor the shipping
of whale oil, rum,, sugar and molasses.
Hence the name,"Pipes"Neck.
6 Five Wigwam Site He found arrowheads
, ,.
Immediately west of the Great Pine
Swamp and the Five Wigwams area,on and stone axes
Pipes Neck Read. stands the historic
house sketched. Today il•s a modern while tilling farmland
Arsharnornaque. 1814 Before Europeans settled Long Island home.gray with white trim,but around
in the mid-17th Century, Riverhead 1614 it was a shingled saltbox. Southold
Southold Town lands were occupied by Historical Society researchers think the
Mr. and Mrs. Corchaug Indians of the Algonkin nation. home may be much older than the 1814
InArshamomaque there;,a trael of land dale assigned to it. They report that
Mitchell Pckunka Just east of Pipes Neck Read which was James Corwin.the builder of the house,
known as the Five Wigwams site.Warren was a miller at the Joseph C. Albertson
Hall. writing in "Pagans, Pilgrims and mill. He married Polly Appleby whose
e. Puritans cites a deed of August 15,1640, father John Appleby,accompanied John •
Joy Bear. Historic Houses of the North, Fork and
64 Shelter Island. Gr.
e*+port 19 1
N
GR 2
t
III
of the Albertson's Lane Cemetery, is not far distant — early
family burial place of Conklynges and other Hashamomack
families where the graves of Corwins of this house are found.
'4000A
3, WILLIAM ALBERTSOTHOUSE c. 1752 j
William Wickham 1868
Oldest Part, possibly mid 1600's
(Mrs. Stanley Barsezewski, Wickham Park, Arshamomaque)
The Albertsons of historic Dutch, New Amsterdam, New
Utrecht ancestry, held large Hashamomack land areas and
homes in the 18th and part of the 19th centuries. The "Four-
score Acres" tract granted to John Conklynge of Common
Lands, 1684, by the inhabitants came eventually into William
Albertson's hands by 1779 and 1798 (J. Wickham Case, South-
old Town Records). It was claimed by Lawyer Albertson
t' Case, deceased descendant, that William Albertson, son of
E William Albertson and Mary Parker, was born in this Hasha-
momack homestead 1752. Be married Sarah Conklynge, daugh-
ter of Capt. Joseph Conklynge, 1780. Their son, Joseph C.
Albertson, was born there; William and William C. of follow-
ing
o low-
ing generations.
By wills and deeds recorded in Riverhead, searched by
?: Earle Linton, Historical Society member, Joseph C. Albertson,
son Albert and William C. Albertson later are found with
¢. home's and farms southerly (Conklins Point) and westerly
bordering Mill Creek; with William Albertson, son of Joseph
z ! C., in this homestead under description. The southerly and
i westerly parcels by deeds of 1887 passed into the hands of
a DeWitt C. Sage, founder of Sage's Brick Yard 1888.
r'
The Albertsons were farm owners, mill owners and prom-
inent citizens. Three were Town Supervisors; William, Joseph
j C. and Albert.
• The Wickham family ownership of this homestead and
lands was dated in a deed, August 27, 1868. Albertson family
heirs of.several generations were the grantors of this old j.
homestead and farm, described as where William Albertson
(deceased 1818) lived, to Lawyer William Wickham, descen-
dant of Col. Joseph Wickham (1648, Wethersfield, Conn., later
f Southold). William Wickham was distinguished as lawyer,
i District Attorney and able public leader. He married Sarah E.
t• Havens, daughter of Col. John Havens of Patchogue and had
chldren, James, William H. and Julia M. The Wickhams lived
in Cutchogue and retained the Hashamomack property for its
10
Guide to Historic Markers.
x South.old Historical Society. 1960
r
d
t
r
i
Y GR 2
is
Attachme"t
zz
�- 1A i
c Bridge ih marshes
at south end of
Pipe's Neck Road.
F
I� FRorq NW
Photos RSM—XXX-24
ISL
Drive-in
Theater g219
Sub lotion N.Y.S. DOT
17 Southold Quad
25
I A Z
N+T 'ate .•
i - rqueL a
v °O'� j
• °Cent.:
d 4
71
T
•oho _-d ��� _N�
I �i 119 a `a -____�- '��•• -
a. aero
' b r..' i•f. 'r-t�C
( 4
P
t o � 05,
togga _ ly J; t a , s P
PUT C
-1111 allow
f..
P R'
z
,�• fi c ,ti
• j ,.a4 a. / } . r 3
NWI
S`��,sF k $m° �x� y�Y�r g£" x s ,r�,� j e '}"x- •
'19
,,��
OR
F x T? 0 'A1E h' 1 "tow
�j �Y•"atiF rfi �., WS1x �� � n5 nq a�r a r '(x� }.
`r
low TO, k ( _ n } ( i P _ 3`rx '
u 4
All,;;r5yy5,a��(Yj"''03
Y N� (-,rypr'y�
fJ -otl { t✓"P`P Iz 4� �1.; R@y� i x Y F �. <f` ryYk _
Tom 'Wit
psa
'Q s eY far '7 .V tY, a� T'vrSq f T Pt°d rA x d` T
<y��.P
� ��• T3 ,j�;y>�.+�`',tfi� ..a 'a . +, z�TD� p�� fh,�'bb,.�r`Y��r� �Qjt-0� .
k '� . � .�, tbySYP- - --a '�
GR 2
„v� T
u.
19 u'
l Nv l
x �
AST MAR C
i Pnld.Pi S71
k.
.-V
[0. V C�
4
•ate.? iY + CLaoea Pt
p '«
PtEi
.Ir'.'. �- y
Ha Braclr+2lf
d5❑ a : GR6�N r
M._ PUP oa
EE
tt
PIPES CovE %DuIv
fF :.,
Fanncnq Pt �
DERI
.CH
YYI ` f �f��f_•• t y Y_ 11yM
•7`
pW4
G
Ca kLin9P! '65
�S;Jinnangs� o.n..w. SHEth'ER o yi' J � �+�'
x
t+ � .bf Hf�a i . r A It MM'i Q �' ♦ a n'u'�.{F� ''
I; u
Y
Hagatrom. Atlas of Suffolk County. 1983
Pipes Neck Bridge
EW YORK STATE HIORIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE 7I&ENTORY FORM GR 3
ice Use Only--Site Identifier
Inventory of Southold
Identifier,Town Landmarks Date August 1987
e Town of Southold/SPLIA Phone 516) 765-1892
t Town Hall. Main Road, Southold
L.I. N.Y.
Zi 11971
nation (if any) Southold Town Community Development Office
e Identifier (s) Osman Brickyard
o' ty Suffolk One of following: City
Township Soui
thold
incorporated Vllage
Unincorporated Village or
Hamlet - Greenport
Present Owner
Address
Zip
ESite Description (check all appropriate categories) :
Structure/site
Superstructure: -complete_partial collapsed not evident
Foundation: above . below (ground level) not evident
__Structural subdivisions apparent Only surface traces visible
Buried traces detected
List construction materials (be as specific as possible) :
It is believed that the clay was dug here until water
filled the excavation.
Grounds
_Under cultivation Sustaining erosion Woodland-Floodpla _Upland
Never cultivated Previously cultivated gin _Pastureland
Soil Drainage : excellent good fair _ poor _
Slope: flat gentle moderate steep_ "I
Distance to nearest water from structure (approx. )
Elevation*-'
�r
5. Site Investigation (append additional sheets , if necessary) :
Surface--date (s)
Site Map (Submit with form*)
Collection
Subsurface--date (s)
Testing: shovel coring_ other unit size
no. of units (Submit plan of units with form*)
i
Excavation: unit size no. of units
(Submit plan of units with form*)
* Submission should be 8'k"x11" , if feasible
Investigator none known
Manuscript or published report (s) (reference fully) :
Present repository of materials none known
GR�"3
Page 2
6 . Site inventory : occupation period 17th 'century
a•. date constructed or
b. previous owners, if known Thomae 'Osman
C. modifications , if known
(append additional sheets , if necessary)
7 . Site documentation (append additional sheets, if necessary) : _
a. Historic map references
Name ]aa o Date l ']j Source Daae 174
1)
Present location of original , if known
2) Name
Date �_ Source
Present location of original , if known
b. Representation in existing
gphotography
ated
1) Photo date Where Where located
2) Photo date
C. Primary and secondary source documentationP75 a PP a 18, 22,1 25.
Warren Hall. Parana Puritans
Beers, Comstoc , ne. as o on eland. 1873 • P•P1720
Tercentenar Celebration o out o own. 640-1940.
d. Persons with memory of site: Address
1) Name Address
2) Name
8 . List of material remains other than those used
dain construction (be
as specific as possible in identifying
object
re evident, check here and fill out
If prehistoric materials a
prehistoric site form. _
9 . Map References : Map or maps showing exact location and extent of
site must accompany this form and must be identified
by source and date. Keep this submission to ""x11"
if feasible.
USGS 711 Minute Series Quad. Name Southold
it For Office Use Only--UTM Coordinates
f' 10. Photography (optional for environmental impact survey) : current
Please submit a 5"x7" black and white print (s) showingthe
state of the site. Provide a label for the print (s)
sheet.
ry Skye Moritt, research assistant.
Form prepared by Rosema
it
'I
iI
'f
• GR 3
4 Pond believed to be
near the site of
Thomas Osman' s brick-
yard on Pipe' s Neck
GR-RSM I-2
` From south west
Perhaps this was the
clay pit?
53
13
° c 25 "-
Drivti
Theater 8ZZ9 _
s„e i,r° % ' N.Y.S. DOT Southold Quad
25
- I s
— Pipes
- pv D ANE �
em. CO -
i
l a
N
• . §
Y
1 • r•i
'S
GR 3
SOUTHOLD (Continued)
a
SCHOOLS
LEATHER SCHOOL.
In the village. Route 25.
BRICK SCHOOL.
In the village. Route 25.
GEORGE TAYLOR SCHOOL.
West end of village. Route 25.
2 PRIVATE SUBSCRIPTION SCHOOLS.
} In the village. Route 25.
NICHOLAS EADES SCHOOL.
In the village. Route 25.
BENJAMIN YOUNGS' SCHOOL.
In the village. Route 25.
MEHITABLE BABCOCK'S DAME SCHOOL.
East end of Southold. Route 25.
JAMES TUTHILL SCHOOL.
Bay View.
HASHAMOMMOCK
Hashamommock, first English settlement in the State of
New York,settled by men from Antigua in the Spring of
1637-8.
All signs pertaining to sites are placed along Route
25 in this section, although the sites themselves may
be inland or adjoining the bay.
THOMAS BENEDICT'S MILL SITE.
East side of Tom's Creek. I
THE SITE of the "LONG HOUSE."
TO the STRAWBERRY LOT and HOME SITE of JOHN
COREY. '
TO JOHN OSMAN'S BRICKYARD.
TO CONKLIN'S FERRY to SHELTER ISLAND.
CONKLIN FAMILY GRAVEYARD. i
Here Rarus, the famous trotting horse, was foaled.
THE INLET POND.
THE GREAT PINE SWAMP.
THE FIVE WIGWAMS.
HOME SITE of WILLIAM SALMON.
TO PIGEON'S NECK.
Where millions-of birds rested during their yearly flights
north and south.
HENRY WHITNEY. Mill Wright. titer of Huntington.
THOMAS BENEDICT. Miller.
SITE of FIRST MILL.
Mill Creek Bridge.
THE.STRAWBERRY LOT. �
i
ertrar C 1 bratior+ f
Southold Town. 1 0-19 0
Beers, Comstock, Cline. Atlas of Lo„a Isla+ d. 1873
\��— :.� ,�`�� �''•9i�`� „s I ra/ D ! S T N4
oE(3 6� '� DIST N
r, r�O"� � RdST 1"19)k P,O.
+('YJ , •1 SCHOOL,LO 0
A �v
J X.B.I:_ On firn.Fl , I� •l{• Le �•...�.r�1
• _,�y p E. /"ul I
'c �\�..r � •� J���oie I' .� nL7"" •r .!i
C . cc• •r� 9 lTl NCTf6041�U r �« •I�� �.Y''9N" � �. < _:r�r��_l �t �%�1
S. ( a '1� ?`C$ot •1J 0yrS,C1Lc•Ts'
AIRS O�il.$GF cf>�r„r ,,-A a % (n� .�
SCn of My3 ;vi'u�,"'' . �tl ' R B 0
40 �)
�Ci17�711 1rY \\\ 1 y, *r �I,rlrsr.tl \. t 110U.S(l U
P40AS'
� ,•, �i �i
. , ��;• • L,:= �% tea$ate �,-I � - � - /����.;� ' �
F
• • GR 4
NEW YORK STATE PREHISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM
FOr ,Office :Use -Only--Site Identifier
Project Identifier Historic Str4oures Survey_ Date September 1987
Your Name .Town of go j r ym of Southold
Address iatiX�SP gA Phone Z% 765 1892
,.Tnwn Hall- Mai„ Road
S)uthold, L T , N.Y.
Zip 1�97� I
Organization (if any) Southold Town Community Development Office
1. Site Identifier (s) Five wigwams
2. County Suffolk One of following: City
Township Southold
Incorporated Village
' Unincorporated Village or
Hamlet Greenport
3 . Present Owner
Address
Zip
4 . Site Description (check all appropriate categories) :
Site
A Stray find _Cave/Rockshelter Workshop
Pictograph Quarry Mound
_Burial _Shell midden Village
_Surface evidence _Camp _Material in plow zone
Material below plow zone _Buried evidence Intact occupation floo
_Single component Evidence of features '-Stratified
Location _Multicomponent
_Under cultivation Never cultivated % Previously cultivated
_Pastureland _Woodland Floodplain
_Upland _Sustaining erosion
Soil Drainage : excellent _ good_ fair_ poor _
Slope : flat _ gentle — moderate _ steep _
Distance to nearest water from site (approx. )
Elevation:
5 . Site Investigation (append additional sheets, if necessary) :
A neighbor, Mitchell Pekunka, found arrowheads, axes, etc.
Surface date (s)
_Site Map (Submit wiith form*)
—Collection
Subsurface--date (s)
Testing: shovel coring_ other unit size
s
no. of unit (Submit plan ofunits with form*)
Excavation : unit size no. of units
(Submit plan of units with-form*)
* Submission should be 8'h"x11" , if feasible —
Investigator
Page 2 • • GRIET
Manuscript or published report (s) (reference fully) : J
JffGuide to Historic Markers. Southold Historical Society. 1960, p 3 -
s or1c es of Sou o d Town N.Y, to 1815. 1983. No. J.W.Hto
. Currie—Bell. ou o owns ercentenar , 1940.
Summer of History. map Section
Present repose ory of materials L.I.Chayter N:Y.Sta e Archeological
"
6. ComponentAssociation.s) (cultural affiliation/dates).: , . ,
7 List of material remains (be as specific as possible in identifying
object and material) :
If historic materials are evident, check here and fill out historic
site form.
8 . Map References : Map of maps showing exact location and extent of
site must accompany this form and must be identified
by source and date. Keep this submission to 815"x11"
if possible.
USGS 7'h Minute Series Quad. Name Southold Quad,
For Office Use Only UTM Coordinates
9 . Photography (optional for environmental impact survey) :
Please submit a 5"x7" black and white print (s) showing the current
state of the site. Provide a label for the print (s) on a separate
sheet.
Form prepared by Rosemary Skye Moritt, research assistant.
GR 4
ARSHAMOMAQUE MAP
IIS
LONG ISLRND souNG- ' {
r (Ne.r.5r.0 H
TOWN N[ w
�1
ci, ao o Sar OAdS )F
V � S
w
O
a a�
V o 0
F Z
Srvir'�
0
L I Ar lap
Bu 3 P/PEs
PO^4 COVE
THE 6Hy
y... . ,; . .._. ... e�
i
Guide to Historic Markers.
Southold Historical Society. 1960
!
L
. - - -- w.•, . ..•,
n
r
t GR 4
44 OLD SOUTHOLD TOWN'S TERCENTENARY
S ► THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXHIBIT
j "Have you been to the Indian Exhibit?" asked one Celebra-
tionsight-seer of another. That, as yet, had not been seen, and
the curious, interested person sped on his way to Cutchogue
School to view what is correctly known as the Archaeological
j I Exhibit. To the visitor's delight the call proved of unique and
1 1 educative interest. Mr. and Mrs. Charles F. Goddard met
him at the door. Mr. Goddard of Mattituck, president of the r_
Long Island Chapter of the New York State Archaeological
j Association which presented the exhibit, not only described the '
objects but related them to the needs in the life of the Cor-
chaug Indian, once inhabitor of Southold Town's shores and
forests. The Corchaug was of the great Algonkian stock, and
l _ camp sites have been found and explored at Aquebogue, Mat-
tituck, Cutchogue, "South Arbor," Old Field, Pine's Cove t
Orient. The length of the shores and creek coves tave
„ I up much evidence of their ways of living.
J "Judging by the quantity of broken pottery in their camp
sites, the Corchaug squaws must have been busy as well as
skillful potters," said Mr. Goddard, and showed the typical
wide-mouthed, conoidal or pointed-bottom clay vessels. "They
decorated these, before firing, by impressions of the decorating
tool, usually a bit of scallop shell, the back of which would give
parallel lines and afford a wide variety of designs. Here is a
pot decorated with impressions of a coarse fabric. These fur-
nish a basis for the study of their weaving.
"It was also the squaw's business to keep the home fires
burning all day and the stew in the pot, for the Indian ate
when he chose. Outside the wigwam could be found the squaw's
heavy, grooved ax, handy to split off firewood. Near by would
be the mortar and pestle, or metate and muller for preparing
the coarse corn-meal grits or flour from the maize." The inter- P
esting collection of axheads was displayed and the above-
named articles were viewed.
e "Just look at this toy 1 Children had their toys, presumably."
It was Mrs. Goddard who smiled and pointed to the little clay
stone dog in the exhibit.
"And what quantities of dams, oysters, scallops the men
i
j
j A.H. Currie—Bell. Old Southold Town's
1 Tercentenary. '
1940 z --
i
't •
s
,i
� i
GR 4
}
SOUTHOLD (Continued)
SCHOOLS
LEATHER SCHOOL.
In the village. Route 25.
BRICK SCHOOL.
In the village. Route 25.
GEORGE TAYLOR SCHOOL.
West end of village. Route 25.
2 PRIVATE SUBSCRIPTION ON SCHOOLS.
25.
e
In the village. Route
NICHOLAS FADES SCHOOL.
In the village. Route 25.
BENJAMIN YOUNGS' SCHOOL.
In the village. Route 25.
MEHITABLE BABCOCK'S DAME SCHOOL.
East end of Southold. Route 25.
JAMES TUTHILL SCHOOL.
Bay View.
HASHAMOMMOCK
Hashamommock, first English settlement in the State of
New Yorksettled by men from Antigua in the Spring of '
1637-8.
All signs pertaining to sites are placed along Route
25 in this section, although the sites themselves may
be inland or adjoining the bay.
THOMAS BENEDICT'S MILL SITE.
East side of Tom's Creek.
THE SITE of the "LONG HOUSE."
TO the STRAWBERRY LOT and HOME SITE of JOHN
COREY.
TO JOHN OSMAN'S BRICKYARD.
TO CONKLIN'S FERRY to SHELTER ISLAND.
CONKLIN FAMILY GRAVEYARD. Ar 1
Here Rarus, the famous trotting horse, was foaled.
THE INLET POND. I
THE GREAT PINE SWAMP.
THE FIVE WIGWAMS•
TO PIGEON'S NECK. MSA N.
Where millions.of birds rested during their yearly flights
north and south.
HENRY WHIT] y.THOMAS MMill1Wright.gLater of Huntington.
ENEDICT
SITE of FIRST MILL,
Mill Creek Bridge.
THE.STRAWBERRY LOT,
I '
thold Town. 1640-1940
Tercenterar C lebrati n of Sou
GR
m♦. n m b U C
cr a.i Y i3 mA �Sg .a K
a ro
u� o ma cg 6 G w
O
c c $� _
¢'L-� � � C mz ; off_ E �'"o G d -~-♦
`a-" aovr osrtm � 3''2o` c O u
• y� -_ _ _ z.=
o- rxvoyn "o NEY dmt nn yz< S; d._
-T� "1 y •n N C t� C Q r V 00� yy;� J m n T Y vni eJ a t 9 .n T q
_ cnT6 °j iso EoV � r at o,mS `03... _� $on_'3 o- .
E 'o^
$
s
E E ��-
cz_ _ is C
mm _ � ryv' a.y�= Er
-o nEfi = - - EZ � q T m m 6_ E_
o E E
•� r " v _
�O
�1
O
-- z
s
gab 4i
-
_
c r-I
qu x N
iJ
V]
O 3'+
O
Cu1t*1 Resource Survey Report.08o
— GR 9
� x�l
IV p N
-F
410 071 II
.� PT
y
yoidr mer. c j.
r: �� •��
41006, :.-.
a p
Su tCV
! ..
fal
pipes
Haf a� r
Oft
fatL -
f ala �� j"�:: • �!}V � "� �' a• . �,
r•� i•� �T •�O y-V ,�'J� r
\^ o •`opo_.; ;. ` � ,
' Figure 2. Aboriginal and historic site Locations vy: " 1,.9.n inlet
Pt. Co. Park. (U.S.G.S. 1956)
. P41,25/20 6c12�� 7-IC610 CHARLES P CL'll1N PAGE 01/0'-
CHARLES
1/0_CHARLES R. CUDDY V
Attorney at Law
445 Griffing Avenue
Riverhead,New York 119o1
Tel 4631-369-8200
Fax 4631-369-9080
TO. Mark Terry
Fax 765-3136
TELECOPIER COVER SHEET
Total pages including cover sheet: 1
If transmission is faulty or incomplete, please inform us as soon as possible.
Operator: Catherine Datc• April 25, 2002
CONSIENTS:
Re: lvEnor Subdivision for Milamo Environmental Assessment Review Fee
SCTM#53-1-9
Dear Mr. Terry:
I received your letter of April 24,2002. While I will request my client forward the additional fee at
this time, we should receive a copy of the report which has been paid for and I believe delivered to
the Town many weeks ago. Pease forward a copy of the report to me.
Thank vou.
Charles R. Cuddy
wmi%lei*faxedcwv#ae:wr hpfoo,M WinknfyomLhfallowingareiruandedfor the person arparteeu Honored hereon and are
matedered nme*ately y rVu aAon. l t you have received N is Ire Om4sion in error,you are dimled 10 Pawn thane
by Ihisrds lnnuediwely by repaber maid to the sender at fhs abate address. Postage incurred far the return will be pall
bylhisfam.
f
v
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport,Now York 11844
(631)477 3608
April 24
A ait � 'V
MEMBERS: P 2002 -
George&Jean Betzios Governor George E. Pataki APR 2 6 2002
Darlene Capobianco State Capital
Frank&Gina Chircop P
Anthony&Jeannine Contin Albany, New York 12224 Southold Town
Irene&Tom Costas Pl ai�ning,Board
Lisa&Ty Costas Mil
f. azzo 3
Tom&Jenn Costas Reparcel subdivision Southold
KC. Coughlin SCTM # 1000-53-1-5
Barbara Dai DEC Application# 1-4738-02483100001
Pedra&Rich DelVecchio
Christine Durkin
Jennifer Durkin Dear Sir.
Mary Ann Durkin
Jean Eckardt
Edward Flynn We received a reply from Denise M. Sheehan, Executive
Fortunato P.&Valerie Foti Deputy Commissioner, DEC, to our correspondence to you
Ignatia E. Fold
Jeb Goubeaud Wherein we expressed grave concerns regarding
the above
Dennis&Kathleen Green referenced subdivision request.
C Doug Hardy
Betty Hintze W
1. e are still not satisfied with the
Henry Hintze explanation as to why
Al&Sue Homan this permit application was moved from Region 1 to Albany.
Julia&Timothy Kilcullen
Kristin Kliemarm
Patricia Lauth (a) The Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek (CPPC) recently
Deborah Lindsay made a FOIL request for documents in this file. Our request
Lynn MasNOta was made to Albany and yet we received a reply from Region
Steven Minervini 1. We S pp
Dennis Palumbo specified the DEC application number and were told
Aidan&Eileen O'Reilly that it could not be located that way. It seems that even the
Steven(Larry)Reiter DEC did not Consider Alban to be a reasonable
Eleanor&Fred Rempe Y place to find
Rick Rempe this application. (b) The Chief Permit Administrator for the
Angela Rich DEC also stated that it was very unusual for Albany to
William RussMaryanne Russell aRegion Brian&Maryhandle a R ion 1 application.
Eric Sweeting
Kathleen M.Tole We must ask again, why did this avDiicaffon go to
Olga M. Tole ibany,
2. The tidal wetland boundary delineation originally
submitted by Mr. Milazzo's consultant was wrong. The
incorrect measurements resulted in building envelopes being
drawn where they did not belong. At first, DEC inspected it
and approved it. After this Committee protested vocally and
measured the wetlands ourselves, the parcel was re-
inspected and the correct tidal wetland delineation made.
The building envelopes had to be removed.
Mr. Milazzo's freshwater wetland delineation also was
wrong then and is still wrong now. The DEC freshwater
wetland expert supposedly came here and verified the
accuracy of the survey. It was wrong then and it is wrong
now and it will continue to be wrong until it is re-inspected by
DEC. We insist that DEC send another expert here to re-
measure and most importantly - look at the proposed lots.
There are wetlands and at least two streams present which
are underrepresented or excluded on the latest survey that
Mr. Milazzo recently submitted to DEC. Members of the
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek lust had our
findings verified by a professional!
The survey is so flawed that it seems either Mr.
Milazzo is intentionally trying to deceive the DEC or his
consultant, on his behalf, is attempting to deceive the DEC.
What are we to do as a Committee? Our bottom line
is this_ We pay taxes for services. We expect our
environment to be protected. How much citizen oversight is
necessary to ensure this protection.
3. The area proposed for development was a site of a
Native American settlement. In fact, we were advised that
one of the two oldest arrowheads found in New York State
was found here.
Mr. Milazzo's archeologists did not dig deep enough to
account for the fill that the prior owners had deposited on this
site many years ago. The site was used to dump excess fill
from construction projects of the prior owner's company_
This archeological survey should also be redone.
4. Finally, Ms. Sheehan stated that Southold does not
have an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program
(LWRP). That is true. It is in draft form, but it certainly exists
and it references the extremely unique ecosystem in the
Pipes Creek/Pipes Cove area. It should not be ignored.
This is still a coastal zone and the possible destruction of this
habitat must fall within the New York State Department of
State Coastal Zone policies.
Please use the power of your office to provide us with explanation and
assurance that this application to build in a coastal area surrounded by numerous
wetlands is given the attention it merits. The people who love Pipes Creek/Pipes
Cove would never recover from the loss or contamination of it by over
development. The kayakers, Dammers and recreational boaters are numerous
and active in its preservation. Our numbers are growing because the concern is
great.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Cc Felix Grucci, Congressman
Kenneth P. LaValle, Senator
Patricia Acampora, Assemblywoman
Joshua Horton, Supervisor, Town of Southold
Southold Town Trustees
Southold Planning Office
Erin Crotty, Commissioner DEC
Denise M. Sheehan, Exec. Deputy Comm. DEC
William Adrianoe, DEC, Chief Permit Admin.
Suffolk Times
Traveler Watchman
PLANNING BOARD MEMBA 4,,SUFF01,f •
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ,��� �l/y P.O. Box 1179
Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
WILLIAM J. CREMERS h Z Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax(631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
April 24, 2002
Mr. Charles Cuddy, Esq.
PO Box 1547
Riverhead, NY 11901
Re: Minor Subdivision for Milazzo Environmental Assessment Review Fee
SCTM# 53-1-9
Dear Mr. Cuddy:
The Environmental Assessment Review Report prepared by Nelson, Pope&Voorhis,
LLC. for the proposed action is complete. The fee for the review is $750.00. In July of
2002, a SEQR fee of$500.00 was received. Please remit the remaining $250.00 fee to
the Planning Board office at your earliest convenience. The proposal outlining the
provided services and associated cost of the Environmental Assessment Review Report is
attached for your perusal.
Sincerely,
_-7
Mark Ter
,ZS
enio nvironm mal Planner
Enc.
NELSON, POPE & VOORMIS, LLC
ENVICONMENTIL I PI I N N I N G CONSULTING
III CHARLES J.VOORHIS,CEP,AICP•ARTHUR J.KOERBFR,PE.•VINCENT G.DONNELLY,PE.
VICTOR BERT,PE•JOSEPH R.EPIFANIA,PF.-ROBERT G.NELSON,JR.,PE.
PAUL M.RACZ,PLS.
April 17, 2002
Mark Terry
Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
PO Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Town of Southold, SEQRA Review
Milazzo, Greenport
NP&V#01220
Dear Mark:
Thank you for contacting NP&V for services in connection with SEQR review and the implementation of
the above referenced project.
The following services and fees are proposed:
1. Inspect property and area to determine environmental resources and characteristics.
2. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form(if available).
3. Prepared Part H Environmental Assessment Form.
4. Prepare detailed environmental planning review of the subject application.
Fee: $750.00
5. Review supplemental information submitted by the applicant in support of the application.
6. Prepared recommended determination of significance(if requested by Board).
Fee: Time Rates
Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feel free to call should you have any
questions.
Respectfully submitted,
7C4. orhis,
&V o s,LL
Afll
CEP, AICP
`-nllhofd Town
572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE, NY 11747-21 BB
(6311 427-5665 • FAX (631] 427-5620 • wwwnelsonpope.com
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport, New York 119.44
(631)477 3606
MEMBERS: April 23, 2002
George&Jean Betzios
Darlene Capobianco k�
Frank&Gina Chircop Hon. Joshua Y. Horton
Anthony&Jeannine Contino Supervisor d'
Irene&Tom Costas Town of Southold
Use&Ty Costas
Tom&Jenn Costas 53095 State Route 25 AVN 4 ZUOZ
K.C.Coughlin PO Box 1179
Barbara Dai Southold, New York 11971-0959
Padre&Rich DelVecchio Southold Town
Christine Durkin
Jennifer Durkin Pial i'IingBoard
Mary Ann Durkin Supervisor Horton,
Jean Eckardt
Edward Flynn
Fortunato P. &Valerie Foti The Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek is a grass-roots
Ignatia E. Foh
organization with a membership including area residents,
Jeff Goubeaud
Dennis&Kathleen Green recreational users, sportsmen and clammers. We have been in
C Doug Hardy contact with many agencies and individuals in our efforts to
Betty Hintze promote re
Henry Hintze P preservation projects in the Pipes Creek/Pipes Cove
Al&Sue Homan Basin.
Julia&Timothy Kilcullen
Kristin Kliamann In our contact with New York State Department of
Patrice Lauth Pa
Deborah Lindsay Environmental Conservation we have found that they do not
Lynn Mastrota have adequate information available for review because the
Steven i mni
P
Dennis Palumbo Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program
Aidan&Eileen O'Reilly (LWRP) has not been formally adopted and filed with New York
Steven(Larry)Reiter State. The draft form of this document has already been subject
Eleanor&Fred Rempe
Rick Rempe of public meetings and available for public inspections. Our
Angela Rich Committee has found this document to be an invaluable source
Brian&RussMaryack
nn of information. Yet the document's 'draft' status has been used
Brian&Maryanne Russell
Eric Sweeting against us in our preservation efforts and to trivialize its data.
Kathleen M. Tole
Olga M. Tole We strongly urge you to formally adopt this document and
forward it to New York State as soon as possible. We believe
this action is overdue.
Thank you for your anticipated support.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
CC: Southold Town Board
Albert K Krupski, Jr., Chairman, Town Trustees
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board
Richard C. Ryan, Chairman, Land Preservation Committee
Melissa Spiro, Preservation Officer
Val Scopaz, Senior Planner
• • , ,�F
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport,New York 11644
(631)477 3608
S � y�spJa`
APR 2 4 ival
MEMBERS: April 23, 2002 SOUthold Tcwn
George&Jean Betzios William Adriance Pjai ing Boar.
Darlene Capobianco
Frank&Gina Chircop Chief Permit Administrator
Anthony&Jeannine Contino New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Irene&Tom Costas 625 Broadway
Lisa&Ty Costas Alban
Tom&Jenn Costas y, New York 12233-1011
KC_Coughlin
Barbara Dai Ref. DEC Application 1-4738-02483-00001
Peds&Rich Delvecchio
Christine Durkin MilaZZo SCTM # 1000-53-1-9
Jennifer Durkin
Mary Ann Durkin Dear Mr. Adriance:
Jean Eckardt
Edward Flynn
Fortunalo P. &Valerie Foti At the suggestion of Ms. Denise Sheehan, the Committee
Ignacia E. Foti (
Jeff Goubeaud to Preserve Pipes Creek CPPC) y is askingfor our immediate
Dennis&Kathleen Green intervention to prevent the possible approval of the above
C Doug Hardy referenced permit application.
Betty Hintze
Henry Hintze
Al&Sue Homan This application has a history of inaccurate subdivision
Julia&Timothy Kilcullen map submissions to the DEC and to the Town of Southold.
Kristin Lauth
When these inaccuracies g
Patricia Lautn regarding tidal wetland delineation
Deborah Lindsay were brought to light by this Committee, they were redrawn at the
Lynn Mastrota direction of the DEC.
Steven Minervini
Dennis Palumbo
Aidan&Eileen O'Reilly In correspondence to the DEC dated 2/11/2002, this
Steven(Larry) Reiter inaccurate delineation is happening again with regard to this
Eleanor& Fred Rempe
Ride Rempe permit application (copy of correspondence attached). Mr.
Angela Rid, Jeffrey Seeman, Coastal Environmental Corporation, on behalf of
Bdfiamrian&MaryRussanne
his client, John Milazzo/Milazzo LLC, has stated that the tidal
Brian&Maryanne Russell
Eric Sweating wetlands have been redone with a landward movement on Lots 2
Kathleen M. Tole and 3. At the same time, Mr. Seeman reaffirms the accuracy of
Olga M. Tole the fresh water wetland boundaries.
Mr. Adriance, they too are inaccurate. On the February 4,
2002 survey/plan the wetlands are underrepresented, some are
completely missing and it does not show at least 2 streams on the parcels. This
has been verified to the Committee by an expert contracted by the Town of
Southold. The errors dramatically effect setbacks and viability of building
envelopes.
This must stop. How much "watchdog" activity is the public expected to
do? We want DEC to come down here again. These wetland delineations are
wrong and the CPPC wants to know what DEC is going to do about it.
By the way, does the new map submitted for this subdivision show the
studio located on Lot 3 with the 2 story house, garage and in ground pool? It is
surrounded by wetlands? A setback stake is in the middle of one of the streams,
rather than 100 feet from it. The "studio" was originally proposed smack in the
middle of a wetland but DEC told Mr. Milazzo to take it off the map. Now it is part
of the proposed building complex on Lot 3. Further, Lots 1 and 2 do not show
buildings. What type of structures are proposed for these lots.
Please advise this Committee as soon as possible of the status of this
application. We are waiting for FOIL requests on this file.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Cc: Governor George Pataki
Felix Grucci, Congressman
Erin Crotty, Commissioner DEC
Kenneth P. LaValle, Senator
Patricia Acampora, Assemblywoman
Joshua Horton, Supervisor, Town of Southold
Southold Planning Board
Southold Town Trustees
Richard C. Ryan, Chairman, Southold Preservation Committee
Suffolk Times
Traveler Watchman
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport, New York 11844
(631)477 3606
MEMBERS: April 22, 2002
George&Jean Betzios Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
APR 2 4 2ii z
Darlene Capobianco Southold Town Planning Board
Frank&Gina Chircop
Anthony&Jeannine Contin Town Halt 53095 State Route 25 Snilthold Town
Irene&Tom Costas P.O. BOX 1179 Pi= a tiEraClOOs'=
Lisa&Ty costes
Tom&Jenn Costas Southold, New York 11971-0959
KC- Coughlin
Barbara Dai Ref. Milazzo Subdivision SCTM#1000-53-1-9
Peds& Rich DelVecchio
Christine Durkin
Jennifer Durkin Dear Mr. Orlowski,
Mary Ann Durkin
Jean Eckardt The Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek CPPC Is
Edward Flynn Pe
Fortunate,P. &Valerie Foti responding to correspondence to you from Jeffrey Seeman,
Ignatia E. Foti Coastal Environmental Corporation, dated 2128102 regarding the
Jeff Goubeaud
Dennis&Kathleen Green above referenced subdivision application. Mr. Seeman states in
C Doug Hardy Part D 1. that the application is for 3 residential lots on 12.5253
Betty Hintze
Henry Hintze acres with 1 dwelling on each lot. He cites sanitary wastewater
Al&Sue Homan use as well as water usage.
Julia&Timothy Kilcullen
Kristinaunn
Lauth
Patricia Lauth The CPPC submits the following.
Deborah Lindsay
Lynn Mastrota 1. The latest subdivision plan submitted by Mr. Milauo on
Steven alum o on Lots 1 and 2. e building
P3118102 does not show dwellings LTh
Dennis Palumbog
Aidan&Eileen O'Reilly envelope on Lot 2 does not appear to be adequate to support a
Steven(Larry) Reiter building. On Lot 3, it shows a 2 story house, a studio, a garage
Eleanor&Fred Rempe and an in round swimming 1 This complex is surrounded b
Rick Rempe 9 9 P�• P Y
Angela Rich wetlands.
William Russack
Brian&Maryanne Russell
Eric Sweeting 2. The freshwater wetlands are underrepresented near all 3
Kathleen M. Tole parcels. At least 2 streams, as well as additional wetlands are
Olga M. Tole not shown on Mr. Milazzo's latest plan submitted to you.
It defies our imagination that this is another error. The last
plan that was submitted also had inaccurate tidal wetland
delineation. After this Committee protested loudly and wrote to
many people, including our Governor, DEC Region 1 again sent someone
out to remeasure. Lo and behold we were right. Our measurements, not
Mr. Milazzo's consultants and surveyors, were correct.
We are again saying the same thing. Mr. Seeman must have
measured incorrectly or Young and Young missed substantial freshwater
wetlands on the 3 parcel proposal. Yet Mr. Seeman's letter to the DEC
dated 2/11/02 (see attached) verified the accuracy of the freshwater
delineation!
The under-representation or exclusion of wetlands not only effects
setbacks, but afters feasibility of building envelopes.
3. A vast majority of the 12.5253 acres are wetland of some sort or
another. In almost every direction, these parcels need variances and
exceptions to current rules.
These wetlands provide for drainage for the homeowners on the
west side of the parcel along Pipes Neck Road. They are part of an
extensive drainage system from the property and wetlands north of the
parcel. They include freshwater recharge areas which maintain the salinity
balance in Pipes Creek. They provide habitat for many native species.
4. Mr. Seeman states that the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA)
said "water is currently available for additional hookups". The letter also
said that there is no guarantee. We are presently protesting any decision
to provide public water to these parcels. We believe to do so would
negatively impact SCWA's present customers and that they should provide
water to existing homes in the eastern towns long before they provide
water to new subdivisions, especially to new subdivisions that could not
otherwise support themselves on a well but are totally dependent on public
water. This position has also been publicly supported by the SCWA.
5. We also believe the Suffolk Department of Health will not be able to
issue permits for septic systems. We intend to track their application
progress. This land, in particular near Lot 1, has extensive clay
composition and will not support appropriate septic operation. The
elevation on each lot is substantially below the elevation that would
support a waste system.
Finally, the Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek believes that our concerns
and findings will be reinforced by the report you receive from the Town of
Southold environmental consultants to this subdivision.
Pipes Creek and Pipes Cove can never be replaced. If they become
contaminated, the loss will be felt by the members of our Committee, the Nature
Conservancy, the Audubon Society, Ducks Unlimited, local kayakers, clammers,
recreational boaters and the tourists who visit.
Please don't let this happen.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
CC: Joshua Horton, Supervisor, Town of Southold
Southold Town Trustees
Felix Grucci, Congressman
Kenneth P. LaValle, Senator
Patricia Acampora, Assemblywoman
Steve Jones, SCWA
North Fork Environmental Council
Richard C. Ryan, Chairman, Land Preservation Cmte
Val Scopaz, Town Planner
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport,New York 11844
(631)477 3606
APR 2 4 2uuz
Southold Town
!'iaj�rlin�j B0;3re
MEMBERS: April 22, 2002
George&Jean Betzios Mr. Michael LoGrande, Chairman
Darlene Capobianco
Frank&Gina Chircop Suffolk County Water Authority
Anthony&Jeannine Cortin 4060 Sunrise Highway
Irene&Tom Costas Oakdale, NY 11769-0901
Use&Ty Costas
Tom&Jenn Costas
K.C. Coughlin Reference: 1. Milazzo application for water for a 3 parcel
Barbara Dal subdivision Southold SCTM#1000-53-1-9
Pedro&Rich DeNecchio
Christine Dunkin 2. SCWA Timothy J. Hopkins letter dated 4/27/01
Jennifer Durkin to John Milazzo
Mary Ann Durkin
Jean Eckardt 3. SCWA Michael LoGrande letter dated 7/25/01
Edward Flynn to the Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Fortunato P. &Valerie Foti
Ignatia E. Foti
Jeff Goubeaud
Dennis&Kathleen Green Dear Mr. LoGrande,
C Doug Hardy
Betty Hintze
Henry Hintze The CPPC is writingto you in order to understand the
At&Sue Homan discrepancies in the above referenced correspondence. It
Julia&Timothy Kilcullen appears that one hand of the SCWA does not know what the
Kristinaunn
PatPatriciaLLauth g• �other is doing. We ho that is the case rather than that there
Deborah Lindsay was an attempt on SCWA's part to mislead this Committee.
Lynn Mastrota
Steven Minervini On July y pp
Dennis Palumbo y 25, 2001 you responded to a letter from this
Aidan&Eileen O'Reilly committee dated July 23, 2001 in which we questioned a possible
Steven(Larry)Reiter conflict of interest in any request for public water service to the 3
Eleanor&Fred Rempe
Rick Ramps parcel Milazzo subdivision (SCTM#1000-53-1-9).
Angela Rich
Brian
RussMaryack
nn In your Jetter you stated that Mr. Milazzo's son John a
Ericanti Maryanne Russell SCWA attorney for more than six years, had disclosed his
Kathleen M. Tole fathers INTENT to purchase the subject parcels. You further
Olga M. Tole Stated that
you told John that he should have no connection with
any application made for a request for public water and that it
would be handled by Timothy Hopkins, SCWA General Counsel.
About 7 months odor to your letter to the Committee to Preserve
Pines Creek Mr. Milano had already applied for water service. M fba Mr.
Milano applied for SCWA water hookups for his 3 parcel subdivision on
December 1A 2000-before he even owned the omoperty. This is confirmed in
the above referenced correspondence to him from Timothy Hopkins. This
correspondence suggests to us tacit approval for public water after September
20011 This was done in direct opposition to your stated criteria for full
environmental review and impact on water supply.
This unique ecosystem which we are trying to protect from over
development(supported by the Nature Conservancy, Audubon Society, Ducks
Unlimited, local, regional and federal representatives, as well as many
individuals) is under threat of destruction if you approve public water. SCWA
should not be dependent on other agencies deciding this issue. You have a
mandate to protect our water from depletion. SCWA should be capable of
making independent decisions on new requests for water and those decisions
should be made with your present customers in mind and with the interest of
those already on waiting lists for public water.
You are violating your own public statements attesting to the fact that the
public wells are not limitless sources of good water. Mr. Milazzo should be
required to provide proof that he could sustain independent wells on this
proposed subdivision.
These wooded wetland acres are the ecosystem which helps keep your
public water viable as well as a habitat for the many forms of wildlife who make
Pipes Creek their home.
We are making a FOIL request under separate cover for all letters, maps,
etc. in the Milazzo file. This committee should not have to do this. Those of us
wishing to protect this gem on the shores of the North Fork should not have to be
the environmental watchdogs. The agencies entrusted with our public trust
should be doing this for us. Your agency is one of them.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
CC: Felix Grucci, Congressman
Patricia Acampora, Assemblywoman
Kenneth P. LaValle, Senator
Steve Jones, SCWA
Timothy Hopkins, General Counsel,SCWA
Michael Frank, Deputy CEO for Customer Service,SCWA
Herman Miller, Deputy CEO for Operations,SCWA
Dona Roberts, Regional Manager,SCWA
Joshua Horton, Supervisor, Town of Southold
Southold Town Trustees
Southold Planning Board
Suffolk Times
Traveler Watchman
SUFFOIX COUN'T'Y WATER AUTHORITY
M iich"A.LoGrande,chairman Administrative offices:4080 Sunrise Highway,Oslydde,NY 117890801
Melvin M.Fries,M.D.,Seaetary (631)5895200
James T.B.Tripp,Member Fax(631)5630370
Eric J.Russo,Member Jul 25, 2001
John E.Gee,Jr.,Member y
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport, New York 11844
Re: Subdivision of 12%Acre Parcel at Pines Creek
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter dated July 23, 2001 regarding the above referenced
matter. You should be advised that the Suffolk County Water Authority has a very strict
conflict of interest policy that requires its employees to disclose any potential conflicts of
interest.
Well before the above referenced property was purchased by Milazzo Family LLC,
John Milazzo (son of John and Rose Milazzo),who has been an attorney with the Water
Authority for the last six years,disclosed the contemplated purchase to me. I instructed
that he should have no connection with any application made to the Water Authority for
public water with respect to the subject property and directed that any such application be
handled by our General Counsel,Tim Hopkins.
Currently public water supply is being provided to new subdivisions within the Town
of Southold by the Water Authority only after an appropriate environmental review of the
project is completed, which must include a full analysis of the impacts to public water
supply. The Water Authority has been working with the Town of Southold to ensure that
an appropriate environmental review is conducted for each new subdivision. Such an
environmental review should also address the wetlands and ecosystem issues discussed
in your letter.
However,the Water Authority only has jurisdiction over public water supply issues.
The Lead Agency for the subdivision of the property would have to be either the Town of
Southold or the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and your
comments regarding wetlands and ecosystem issues should be directed to those agencies.
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek July 25, 2001
- 2 -
1 am a strong advocate of public ownership of environmentally significant property.
The Water Authority is always looking for new sites for supply wells in the Town of.
Southold given the limited supply. Considering the subject property's proximity to salt
water, it would not be a candidate for acquisition by the Water Authority.
The County of Suffolk and the Town of Southold both have acquisition programs
that may allow for the purchase of this property. In addition, an organization called the
Peconic Land Trust works with property owners to protect environmentally sensitive
property. You may wish to contact these entities about public acquisition and/or
establishing a protection program for this property.
1 hope the concerns raised in your letter have been addressed. If you need any
additional information, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
'Miachae A. LoGrande
Chairman
MAL:dmm
'•I W � k '�'' ' �1 � V � b � ,ii,t4'
acyl
NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING • C 0 N S U L T I N G
II CHARLES J.VOORHIS,CEP,AICP•ARTHUR J.KOERBER,RE.•VINCENT G.DONNELLY,RE.
VICTOR BERT,PE.•JOSEPH P.EPIFANIA,RE.-ROBERT G.NELSON,JR,P.E.
PAUL M.RACZ,P.L.S.
April 17, 2002
Mark Terry
Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
PO Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Town of Southold, SEQRA Review
Milazzo, Greenport
NP&V#01220
Dear Mark:
Thank you for contacting NP&V for services in connection with SEQR review and the implementation of
the above referenced project.
The following services and fees are proposed:
1. Inspect property and area to determine environmental resources and characteristics.
2. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form(if available).
3. Prepared Part II Environmental Assessment Form.
4. Prepare detailed environmental planning review of the subject application.
Fee: $750.00
5. Review supplemental information submitted by the applicant in support of the application.
6. Prepared recommended determination of significance(if requested by Board).
Fee: Time Rates
Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feel free to call should you have any
questions.
Respectfully submitted,
NEL Por &V s,LL
C orhis, CEP, AICP
APP 1 � ldut
Southold Town
Board
572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE, NY 99747-2168
C6311 427-5565• FAX [631] 427-5620 • www.nelson........
4PR-17-2002 09:54 516 425 1257 P.01iO3
PW
NELSON, POPE 6 VOORHIS, LLC
EM/IRONMENTAL PLANNING - CONSULTING
- WALT WI-{rtTnAN ROAO.P/BLVILI-E.N'I 11767
(Q31) 4275665 FAX (631) 427-5620
npVsnelsonpap�.�Om
FAX COVER SHEET
To: Mark Terry
Phone: 765-1899
Fax: 765-1823
From: Shana Lacey
Date: April 17, 2002
Re: Zoumas, Hogs Neck
*reenport
No. of Pages: 3
(including Cover)
Comments:
Please feel free to call should you have any questions or require any additional
information.
Sincerely,
Shana
RPR-17-2002 09:55 516 425 1257 P.02iO3
• NELSON, Pc*E 6 VOORHIB, LLC
E N V I AD N M E N T A L 0 L A N N IN * C ON E II L T
CHARLES J.VOORHIS.CF.P.AICP•ARTHUR,I.KOEREER,RE•VINCENI 0.DONNFLLV,RE
VICTOR BERT,RE.•JUSEPH R.EPIFANI A.F.E.-RCEF.RT a.NELSON,JR.,RE
PAUIr M.RACZ,P.L.-
April 17,2002
Mark Terry
Town of Southold
Town Hall,53095 Main Road
PO Box 1179
Southold,NY 11971
Re: Town of Southold, SEQRA Review
Milazzo, Greenport
NP&V#01220
Dear Mark:
Thank you for contacting NP&V for services in connection with SEAR review and the implementation of
the above referenced project.
The following services and fees are proposed:
1. Inspect property and area to determine enviionmental resources and characteristics.
2. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form(if available).
3. Prepared Part II Environmental Assessment.Form.
4. Prepare detailed environmental planning review of the subject application.
Fee: $750.00
5. Review supplemental information submitted by the applicant in support of the application.
6. Prepared recommended determination of significance(if requested by Board).
Fee: Time Rates
Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feel free to call should you have any
questions.
Respectfully submitted,
NE 0 &VICI^ S'LL
this,CEP.AICP
(831)427 eBe WHITMAN• FAX (031)467-5820• WVV,^*I=0MI30P6-00ffI
C0
PPR-17-2002 09:55 516 425 1257 P.03iO3
•
NELSON, PARI@ 8yooPHIS, LLC
E N V I P O N M C N T A L PLANNING • CONUULTING
II CHARLES J.VOORH IS.CFP.AICF•ARTH UP J.KOERSER.P.E.•VINCER IG.DONN EU.T P E.
VICTOR BERT,P$•JOSEPH R,EPIFANIA.PE.-ROREPT(7-NELSON.JR„PE.
PAUL M.RAC2,F.L.S.
April 17,2002
Mark Terry
Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
PO Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Town of Southold.SEQRA Review
Zoumas Subdivision.Hogs Neck
NP&V 1101219
Dear Mark:
Thank you for contacting NP&V for services in connection with SEQR review and the implementation of
the above referenced project
The following services and fees are proposed;
1. Inspect property.and area to determine environmental resources and characteristics..
2. Review Part I Environmental Assessment Form(if available).
3. Prepared Part R Environmental Assessment Form
4. Prepare detailed environmental planning review of the subject application.
Fee: $750.00
5. Review supplemental information submitted by the applicant in support of the application.
G. Prepared recommended determination of significance(if requested by Board).
Fee: Time Rates
Thank you for the opportunity to assist on this project. Please feel free to call should you have any
questions.
Respectfull submitted,
N&LS , d
rles J. his,CEP,AICF
579 WALT WHITMAN ROAD. MELVILLe. NY 11747.21 BB
'(631)4127-55615• PAX (691)487•BB20 •www.nelepnp•)Pe.Cpm
TOTAL P.03
CHARLES R.CUDDY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
445 GRIFFING AVENUE
RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK
Mailm Addr.: TEL: (631)369-8200
P.O.Box 1547 FAX: (631)369-9080
Riverhead,NY 11901 E-mail: crcuddy@earthlink.net
March 15, 2002
Mark Terry
Planning Board
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: MilaZZO Subdivision
Pipes Neck Road, Greenport, NY 11944
Dear Mr. Terry:
Pursuant to your request, enclosed please find three
copies of the above map, dated 2/4/02 .
Very truly yours,
Charles R. Cuddy
Enclosures
CRC:cg
MAK tl zuuz
Southold Town
Planning Board
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 0�0Cp p O. Box 1179
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR.
Chairman C Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
WILLIAM J.CREMERS H Z Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDSQ T Telephone(631) 765-1938
GEORGE
RIRICHARD HIE LA O JR y�Q 0�� Fax (631) 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
March 13, 2002
Mr. Charles Voorhis
Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC
572 Walt Whitman Road
Melville, New York 11747
Re: Review of EAF for Milazzo
SCTM#1000-53-01-9
Dear Mr. Voorhis:
The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Long Environmental Assessment
Form for the above-mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Also enclosed are:
1. A map dated February 4, 2002
2. A Planning Board resolution letter dated April 14, 2001
3. The EAF Part D. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative Request
response dated February 28, 2002.
The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on April 14, 2001.
Due to the environmental sensitivity of the parcel, the Planning Board will not act on the
proposed map until the review is complete and all impacts are considered. The Board
will make their SEQRA determination at a future public meeting.
The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover.
Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
Marerry
Senior Envir ntal Planner
Enc.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS� o�OS�FFO(,�co
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. h`L` Gy P.O. Box 1179
Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
WILLIAM J. CREMERS Z Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDS WO .F Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGERICHARD CAGE O JR. 'j'�O! �aO� Fax (631) 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
March 8, 2002
Mr. Steve Jones
Suffolk County Water Authority
Administrative Offices
4060 Sunrise Highway
Oakdale, NY 11769-0901
Re: Section D. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative
SCTM#1000-97-1-12.6 Minor Subdivision of Pugliese
SCTM#1000-53-1-9 Minor Subdivision for Johd5jMMb
SCTM#97-8-31.2 &31.4 Minor Subdivision for Nicokim
Dear Mr. Jones:
Your Land Preservation Committee lecture the other night was very informative,well put
and at times, an eye-opener; serious land conservation requires serious regulation. In an
attempt to better coordinate with the SCWA, I am enclosing all the Revised EAF Section
D. Water Narrative responses that our department has received to date. Any pertinent
information you can offer on the applications would be welcomed. If you have any
questions please do not hesitate to call me at 765-1938, extension 243.
Sincerely,
ark Terry
Senior Envir ent anner
Enclosures
Coastal Environmental Corporation environmentagaming&permits
42 Lewis Road wetlands impact statemeats
East Qaogae,New York 11942 waste management regulatory compliance
(631)653 3399 &x (631)653 3451 Board CeratpedEavimnmemot Professionals
e-mail jiwoast@optonline.net
February 28, 2002
Planning Board Office
Town of Southold
Town Hall 53095 State Route 25
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971-0959 MAR 012002
Attention Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town
Dear Mr. Orlowski: Planning Board
In response to your February 11, 2002 letter to Mr. Charles R. Cuddy, Attorney at Law
regarding the minor subdivision application for John Milazzo: SCTM# 1000-53-1-9, We
are pleased to provide the following information.
Response to the Town of Southold State Environmental Quality Review Act
Environmental Assessment Form Minor Subdivision for John Milazzo
SCTM# 100-53-1-9
Part D. "Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative Request"
1. Provide explanation of existing use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use;
compare to proposed use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use.
The proposed application is a subdivision of land. The application is for three (3)
residential lots on 12.5253 acres in the R-80 zoning use district, along the west side of
Pipes Creek, Greenport, New York (Map prepared by Young & Young, Feb 04, 2002).
The proposed use is for one residential dwelling on each lot.
There are no existing structures, occupancies, sanitary flows or water consumption
activities associated with the site. Based on Suffolk County Department of Health
Services daily sanitary flow estimates for single family residential homes set at 300
gallons per day, the combined sanitary discharge flows for the proposed three-lot
subdivision is expected to generate 900 gallons per day of sanitary wastewater. This is
equivalent to a density of approximately one residential unit per four acres. Water use is
expected to be slightly higher than sanitary discharge flows, and is estimated at 400
gallons per day per residential dwelling unit or 1,200 gallons per day of combined water
use for the three-lot residential subdivision.
FE?-26-2"s2 :.F It �1,, ; DEC ENV PMTS ALBAW 519 432 9_59 P.01
�. IL
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation _ S
Division of Environmental Permits, 4`" Floorj-
625 Broadway,Albany, New York 12233-1750
Phone: (618)402-91E2 • FAX: (518)4C2-9168
Website: vonw'-dec.state.ny.us Erindotty
Commltsbnar
FAX TRANSMISSION
To: Mark Terry, Town of Souhold Planning Board Date: 2120102
Fax#: (631)765-3136 pages: 2 Including cover
From: Kevin Kispert-DEP
Subject: Milnuo Property 14738-02483!00001
COMMENTS:
Copy of 7111/02 letter received with revised plans dated 2!4/02.
If you have ary questions,please give me a call at(518)402.9161.
Cassel Eovirommeatel Corporation em irormunnl plsnri tq&permtu
42lswls Road wetlaem impart s"Meet,
Rao Qaogae,New York 1190 walla ra.aeeone retJahrr e"Ouau, !i�
(631)65333" fox (631)6533451 eomdCeMowErwuamneomnoflaskamtr f1�
e-mHjlsrnattQoptsaHaenet j' �.'�
; e6
9 IL
February 11, 2002
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Permit Administrator
Region One-Building 40
SUNY Campus
Stony Brook,NY 11790-2356
I-033-0ay83
RE Application No. l-4738-0248/00001
SCTM# 1000-53-1-9
12. 5 Acre Subdivision for lvfilazzo,Pipes Neck, Greenport,NY
Dear Sirs:
Please find enclosed ten (10) sets of revised subdivision maps dated Feb. 4, 2002,
prepared by Young& Young. These revised maps show the revision to the tidal wetland
line and stake locations based on the December 27, 2001 site inspection with the
representatives from NYSDEC, Young A Young and Coastal Environmental.
The revisions reflect a landward movement of the building envelopes at Lots 2 and 3.The
freshwater wetland boundary remains unchanged by this revision As requested by
NYSDEC,the"hatched arra"as shown on the map will remain undisturbed
At last contact with the Town of Southold, the applicant was advised that the SERQA
process was still pending because of the NYSDEC's involvement with the subdivision
W wetland review. A Short Environmental Assessment Form was filed(dated Nov, 11,
1999) with the NYSDEC/U.S. Army Corp Joint Application. Other than the NYSDEC's
comments, which have now been addressed, we have not received additional oomments
or requests for information from other agencies. It is the applicant's understanding that
Sowhold's application review will not proceed ttather until the NYSDEC regards the
application as complete.
j
u ur cooperation,please contact me if you have additional comments
urs,Seeman, CEP REMnvironnentai Corporation �." .,.,��-► +.ai�/If'
CC. 7. Milazzo, H. Young, C. Cuddy FEB 12 2002
e,•nnn,n. ,+.
co"d 8976 Z0b BTS S11M 1N3 �)M Sat-i S'E+:5-,
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o��SUFFO(,�c
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ��j Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Chairman y� P.O. Box 1179
WILLIAM J. CREMERS N Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDS G Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. .f. �� Fax (631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
February 11, 2002 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Charles Cuddy, Esq.
445 Griffing Avenue
Riverhead, New York 11901
Re: Minor Subdivision for John Milazzo
SCTM# 1000-53-1-9
Completion of Revised Environmental Assessment Form
Section D. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative
Dear Mr. Cuddy:
Water supply and quality within the Town of Southold is a serious community issue. Public water supply,
although provided by the Suffolk County Water Authority, is determined through the current and
projected use of the community. To date, the supply does not meet the demand, however,water use is
controlled by an individuals' actions and can often be mitigated through numerous water conservation
measures implemented during the planning process.
Water quality is very difficult to control. Although point source pollution can usually be traced to its
origin, non-point source pollution is boundless and one of the largest threats to local environmental and
community health. Non-point source pollution has been identified as the primary cause of water quality
degradation in more than 90 percent of New York State's impaired water bodies. In the Town of
Southold, localized well and surface water contamination already exists.
Consequently, the Town of Southold Planning Board in cooperation with the Suffolk County Water
Authority now requires the completion and submittal of the attached Environmental Assessment Form,
Section D. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative as part of the SEQR review process. Until a
completed Environmental Assessment Form, Section D. Informational Details and Water Supply
Narrative is submitted, applications will be considered incomplete and the SEQR review will not proceed.
Sim, cerely,
ennett Or owski Jr.
Chairman
Enclosure
r f • •
D. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS AND WATER SUPPLY NARRATIVE REQUEST
Attach any additional information as maybe needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any
adverse impacts associated withyour proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which
you propose to mitigate or avoid them.
1. Provide explanation of existing site use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use; compare to
proposed use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow,water use.
2. Indicate the source of water supply,nearest public water main,nearest public well field, and adjacent
private wells (if known).
_3. If.public water supply is proposed,indicate the ability of the water utility to provide water supply to
the project. Provide letter of water availability or detailed explanation of status of review by water
utility.
4. If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on-site
water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval or detailed
explanation of status of review by agency.
5. Indicate proposed water conservation measures that will mitigate for unavoidable adverse impacts (If
any). Conservation measures should include,but not be limited to:
a. The use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping.
b. The preservation of existing native vegetative buffers.
o. The conservation of existing open space areas.
d. The implementation of"natural' stormwater management practices (grass swales, filter
strips,created wetlands, etc...).
E. VERIFICATION
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name Date
Signature Title
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment
Form before proceeding with this assessment.
6
Albert J. Krupski, President Town Hall XJb
James King,Vice-President 46 �$OFF��If'C 53095 Route 25 d
Artie Foster �� P.O. Box 1179
Ken Poliwoda Southold, New York 11971-0959 1
Peggy A. Dickerson
r, Telephone(631) 765-1892
Fax(631) 765-1366
y�ol # dap!
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
11
TO: Valerie Scopaz, AICP
FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President JAN ,r,
Board of Trustees a (Jz
DATE: January 16, 2002
P
RE: MILAZZO FAMILY LLC
The Southold Town Board of Trustees reviewed the survey last revised October 9, 2001 and
determined the wetlands line to be accurate.
Any activity within 100' of the wetlands line would require permits from our office.
P�
s
November 27, 2001
Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner
Town of Southold
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: LWRP Document
Milazzo Subdivision- Greenport
Dear Ms. Scopaz:
I am in receipt of a letter from the Asst. Commissioner's office for the DEC. I have enclosed this
letter for your review.
My particular question to you is concerning the paragraph with reference to the LWRP, and the
fact that it has yet to be approved by the Board. I know the Planning Dept. is over-burdened;
however, this document seems to be very important and could help our cause.
The committee has worked very hard to get all our ducks in a row. Right now the Milazzo
application seems to be at a standstill. The committee would like to use this to its benefit.
Your attention to this matter would really be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Irene Costas
CPPC Member �
cc: Mr. Ben Orlowski, Chairman M%
Mr. Al Krupski, Chairman 1V,0V 3 O
Jean Cochrane, Supervisor
Melissa Spiro, Land Preservation Coordinator Southold Town
finning Board
November 27, 2001
Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner
Town of Southold
P.O. Box 1179
Southold,NY 11971
Re: LWRP Document
Milazzo Subdivision - Greenport
Dear Ms. Scopaz:
I am in receipt of a letter from the Asst. Commissioner's office for the DEC. I have enclosed this
letter for your review.
My particular question to you is concerning the paragraph with reference to the LWRP, and the
fact that it has yet to be approved by the Board. I know the Planning Dept. is over-burdened;
however, this document seems to be very important and could help our cause.
The committee has worked very hard to get all our ducks in a row. Right now the Milazzo
application seems to be at a standstill. The committee would like to use this to its benefit.
Your attention to this matter would really be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Irene Costas
CPPC Member D
NOV 3 0 2101
cc: Mr. Ben Orlowski, Chairman
Mr. Al Krupski, Chairman Southold Town
Jean Cochrane, Supervisor Planning Board
Melissa Spiro,Land Preservation Coordinator
'New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
AsslsteM Cornmiselonsr
041ia6 of Ad ,Aban ,New '"Floor
825 Broadway,AWany,Pkv York 122331019
Phony.(618)40241543 • FAX:(518)402-9016
Websks:www.dsc.sta%.ny.us +comm Caoy
OCT 2 5 t001
CMMUW to Preserve.Pipes Creek
_ 73Q Pipes.lJecic Road__
Greenport,New York 11944
Dear Committee:
Governor Pataki has asked the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation(Depamnent)to reply to your correspondence expressing your concern with
a proposed development of a three-lot subdivision in the Pipes Creek arca of Southold.
Commissioner Crotty may be a decision maker on whether to issue the permit,hence
I am responding to your concerns. Please be assured that the Department staff are reviewing
Your concerns as they relate to the Department's regulatory jurisdiction for the subject proposal.
The Department's jurisdiction includes Freshwater Wetlands pursuant to Article 24 of
the Environmental Conservation Law(ECL)and Tidal Wetlands pursuant to Article 25 of the
ECL. A field inspection of the project site has been undertaken and wetland boundaries
delineated by the applicant's consultant have been verified by a Department biologist, with some
required changes. A survey of these boundaries has been provided on the project plans for the
subdivision It is standard practice to require an in-the-field delineation of wetland boundaries as
those depicted on wetland maps are an approximation of wethnrd locations and changes in
tim can r—colt in adjustmaitaofwewedand boundesies. It is
important that wetland boundaries be precisely delineated as they deteriruneV'�' —
jurisdiction and compliance with development setback requirements.
The Department's review of this proposal must include consideration of the permitting
standards attained in regulations implementing Articles 24 and 25 of the ECL. The regulations
are 6 NYCRR Parts 663 and 661,respectively. Standards inchrde evaluation of potential impacts
to wetlands and compabMity with preservation and protection of the resources contained within
the wetland and the functions provided by the wetland. Resources identified for consideration
include fish and wildlife habitat and functions include recreational opportunity,both of which
you have identified as areas of concern. A decision on satisfaction of permitting standards
awaits completion ofthe application,public notice and comment, consideration of public
comments and additional technical review,as necessary.
2.
As you have indicated,the project site is within an area with a potential to contain
significant cultural resources. Consequently,the Department has required the applicant to
provide for an archaeological investigation undertaken by a qualified archaeologist. A Phase 2
survey has been submitted and is under review by the New York State Office of Parks,
Recreation and Historic Preservation. The need for any additional investigation is dependent
upon the results of the Stage 2 survey and recommendations from the Historic preservation
office.
The application is currently incomplete and will remain so until a number of actions have
been completed as follows:
1. The lead agency designated pursuant to the provisions of the State Environmental Quality
Review Act(SEQR)has made a determination of environmental significance.
For this proposal,the Town of Southold is the SEQR lead agency and must either issue a
negative declaration indicating that the project will not have a significant impact on the
environment or a positive declaration indicating that the project may have a significant
effect A positive declaration requires the preparation of a draft environmental impact
statement which must be accepted by the lead agency before the application before the
Department can be declared complete. At this time,the Town has not notified the
Department of its determination of significance. As the SEQR lead agency,the Town of
Southold is responsible for evaluating issues that are not addressed under the Freshwater
and Tidal Wetlands regulations or by any other SEQR involved agency.
2. The New York State Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation has made a
determination on the project site's eligibility for listing on the State Register of Historic
Places.
This determination includes an identification of the significance of any archaeological or
historic resources discovered and the need for mitigation of impacts to or avoidance of
cultural resources.
3. The applicant provides information requested in a pending notice of inCOm�lete
application.The applicant has been requested to make adjustments to the tidal wetland boundary
shown on the project Plans,to confirm locations of proposed dwellings and associated
amenities on the ground,and to clearly identify on project plans those areas of the
Property to remain undisturbed.
The project is located in the oo=W zone which requires the Department to make a
determination as to consistency of the project with the New York State Department of State ` Y
Coastal Zone Policies. This determination would include consideration of and comments from
a local community where a Local Wate rfmat Revitalization Program(LWRP)is in place. You
have indicated that the project site is located within an approved LWRP. However,Department
records indicate that there is no LWRP on file for the Town of Southold covering the projectATM
v'
�Perbapsduo hhasthe
cau ed some�siondoea have one on file applrcable to areas of the Village �, '
3.
Management of the subject application was moved to the Department's central office in
Albany to assist Region 1 with its large permit application workload However, site inspections
and technical review are being performed by the Department's Region 1 program staff in Stony
Brook who are familiar with local environmental resources. A decision on permit issuance will
not take place until SEAR review requirements are satisfied, completion of procedural steps
contained in the Uniform Procedures regulations governing the Department's review of
applications for permit are completed,and the Department's evaluation of criteria contained in
the permitting standards for Freshwater and Tidal Wetlands are applied to the subject proposal.
Should you have questions regarding the procedures of this Departrnertt or other matters
addressed in this letter,please contact William Adriance, Chief Permit Administrator in the
Division of Environmental.Permits,at(S 18)402-9167. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Denise M. Sheehan
Albert J. Krupski, President SVFFO(� Town Hall �4 C-�
James King,Vice-President ea5$095 Route 25
Henry Smith hGyf P.O.Box 1179
.� Southold, New York 11971-0959
Artie Foster y Z
Ken Poliwoda • Telephone(631) 765-1892
�yol � dao
Fax(631) 765-1366
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Valerie Scopaz, AICP 15,1nu
FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President 0Board of Trustees 2 9 2N1
DATE: November 29, 2001 Southold Town
RE: MILAZZO FAMILY LLC Planning Board
The Southold Town Board of Trustees is currently coordinating with the Department of
Environmental Conservation in order to verify the wetlands line.
We will give you our response as soon as we complete our review.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Is, _
Regional Director, Region One
Building 40-SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356
Phone: (631)444-0345 • FAX: (631)444-0349 )
Website: www.dec,state.ny.us Erin M.Crotty
JQ t. Commissioner
September 21, 2001
Ms. Irene Costas SEP 2 $ 2001P.O. Box 150
Greenport, New York 11944
oUt.`_114 T7W1
Dear Ms. Costas: Planning Board
I am responding on behalf of Governor Pataki and the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation("Department") in regard to recent letters and e-mails concerning the
Milazzo subdivision in Southold. The Department shares your concerns for the environment and
the preservation of natural resources located on the Milazzo property, within the Pipes Creek
corridor and within the Peconic Estuary Preserve.
Please rest assured that the technical review of the application is still being, and has always
been, conducted in Region 1 by experienced members of our Bureau of Habitat and Bureau of
Marine Habitat Protection. Staff in these units administer our Region 1 Freshwater Wetlands and
Tidal Wetlands regulatory programs, respectively, and are intimately familiar with the wetland
resources of Southold and Long Island. Overall project management and coordination for this
application is,however,being handled out of the Division of Environmental Permits in our Albany
headquarters due to a number of factors. Last fall, while this application was active, the Region 1
Division of Environmental Permits experienced a simultaneous loss of 3 staff members, one of
whom was reviewing this application, to promotions in other units,as well as a nearly month-long
loss of electronic connectivity to Department permit application tracking system servers in Albany.
To address the impacts of these events,the Region requested the aid of Environmental Permits staff
in Albany to assist with some of the workload burden from Region 1. The Milazzo application was
one of those assigned to Albany staff. However, it should be noted that two Permits project
managers were assigned to this application, one of whom was the original project manager in our
Region 1 office for this application prior to his promotion to the Albany office and who, therefore,
intimately knew this application. The other project manager is the Division's long-time Tidal
Wetlands specialist. 'therefore, at no time was the environmental review of this application
compromised.
Contrary to statements made in some of your letters, the application did not languish within
the Department. The application had been deemed incomplete for technical review a number of
times and the applicant had been requested to correct and revise the plans and other application
materials so that review could continue. Some of the information requested included the depiction
of an accurate wetlands boundary line on the plans. Other information was also requested of the
applicant to clarify his intent and to allow for an accurate assessment of potential environmental
impacts.
A SEQRA coordinated review of the application has been conducted. The coordinated review
was initiated by the Town of Southold Planning Board and the Town Planning Board has been
designated as Lead Agency. Accordingly,the Department cannot and will not render a decision on
this application until the Planning Board completes the SEQRA review process. Besides the
Department, other involved agencies with which the Planning Board has coordinated include the
Town Trustees, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, and Suffolk County Water
Authority. Please note that the Department has already provided initial input to the Town Planning
Department. The Department has also been advised that, although the Town of Southold has
prepared a Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP), this LWRP is only in draft form at this
time and has not been officially adopted by the Town, nor has it received final approval from the
New York State Department of State, as is required for LWRP implementation.
Thank you again for advising the Department of the issues contained in your letter and for
demonstrating concern for our environment. As noted above, the Department will work with the
Town of Southold and other agencies to ensure that any significant adverse environmental impacts
associated with this project are adequately addressed and mitigated.
Since!,ply;
t
Ray E. Cowen, P.E.
Regional Director
REC:JP:Is
cc: J. Pavacie, Regional Permit Administrator, NYSDEC Region 1
T. Cooke, Environmental Analyst 2, NYSDEC Albany, Div. of Env. Permits
K. Kispert, Environmental Analyst 2, NYSDEC Albany, Div. of Env. Permits
R. Evans, Deputy Regional Permit Administrator, NYSDEC Region I
C. Arfsten,NYSDEC Region 1, Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection
S. Lorence, Regional Manager,NYSDEC Region 1, Bureau of Habitat
V. Scopaz, AICP, Town Planner, Town of Southold
September 16, 2001 C ookmG
Mr. A]Krupski, Chairman
Board of Trustees
P.O. Box 1179
Southold,New York 11972
Re: Milazzo Property -Pipes Neck Road- Greenport,New York
Dear Mr. Krupski:
I am requesting information on the walk through concerning the above property on Wednesday,
Sept. 12th.
It is my understanding that Mr. Milazzo would not allow one of our committee members to walk
the property with you and your board members. Needless to say this does not make any of us
happy, and a little skeptical.
This is such a frustrating situation. His wetland maps have no dimensions. They seem grossly
underestimated, and we're afraid the same thing is going to happen with this property that
happened with the Posillico property across the street. To refresh your memory. Back in 1999,
10 '/2 acres came before your Board. There was a public hearing and we the neighbors on Pipes
Neck Road were at that hearing. You asked Artie Foster if he inspected this property and he told
you it was build able. The very next day Mr. Foster and his trucks were on that property. This
property has not been built on, but there are two cesspool covers sitting above ground for god
and the world to see.
Mr. Krupski, I guess what I am asking is if you could walk the property again with some of our
committee members. There is a spring bed that does not appear on Milazzo's map. There is a
huge pond right behind my home. Milazzo's map shows a much smaller pond. There are just too
many discrepancies. Our committee has grown considerably, and we are all very concerned.
Thank you for your time. If you wish to reach me I am at 549-2708.
Sincerely,
Irene Costas
CPPC Member
cc: Jean Cochrane, Supervisor SEP 16 2WI
Ben Orlowski, Chairman Planning Board
S010.004 Town
m*o
September 19, 2001
Jean Cochrane, Supervisor
Southold Town Hall
P.O. Box 1179
Southold,NY 11971
Re: Milazzo Family LLC
121/2 Acres, Greenport,NY
Dear Jean:
First let me start by hoping all of your family and friends are safe after last Tuesday's horrific
attack.
This is a follow-up letter concerning the above property. Has the town given anymore
consideration to the purchase of this and the surrounding properties?
Members of the CPPC met with their attorney because Milazzo's attorney wanted to find out if
we would be willing to discuss alternatives for the property. However, our attorney didn't know
what alternatives Milazzo was willing to discuss.
He still doesn't have DEC approval. Milazzo did walk the property with Mr. Krupski and his
board on Wednesday, Sept. 12th. We don't know the outcome of that meeting as of yet.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Irene Costas
CPPC Member /
cc: B. Orlowski-Chairman
A. Krupski-Chairman
M. Spiro-Land Preservation ,�A
Fileq erM1°
SEP 202081
; f#1,4-r
Plamrrt BoNd
/W
PO Box 150
Greenport, NY 11944
September 5, 2001
Mr. John Romanelli, Councilman
Mr. Brian Murphy, Councilman
PO Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Pipes Neck Cove
Dear Messrs. Romanelli and Murphy:
After seeing your campaign ad in the Suffolk Times, I thought it time to introduce you to the
"Committee to Preserve Pipes Cove Creek." We are a committee to preserve this area ASAP.
We have inundated Town Hall with letters concerning this area.
John and Rose Milazzo bought 121/2 acres on Pipes Neck Road, proposing a 3-5 house
subdivision. This property is very sensitive with vernal ponds, wetlands, tidal wetlands, not to
mention the enormous amount of wildlife that lives on this property.
Jean Cochrane, Jim McMann, and Melissa Spiro have been down to this area to inspect this
estuary. We have the support of the Land Preservation Committee, and frankly, we need all the
support we can get.
Our committee is inviting you to walk and inspect this property. We are sure you will come to
the same conclusion we all have come to. This property needs to be preserved now.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
COO it
Irene Costas D
CPPC Member SEP 11 2YY1
cc: Jean Cochrane, Supervisor �,�OWlt1
Ben Orlowski, Chairman ✓ �d
Al IZrupski, Chairman FUN
File
s • _New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Division of Environmental Permits, 4`h Floor v
625 Broadway,Albany, New York 12233-1750
Phone: (518)402-9167 • FAX: (518)402-9168
7EnnCro':Website: www.dec.state.ny.us
2v -FYI
August 29, 2001 T �7:5s-ryl
V00 5
Southold Town Planning Board Rt - has
Town Hall, 53095
State Route 25, P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971-1938 a
Re: Milazzo Subdivision, Pipes Creek SEP Olt 2001
DEC No. 1-4738-02483/00001 Southold Town
Dear SEQR Coordinator: Planning Board
Your SEQR coordination notice was received by this office on August 15, 2001. An
initial review by Department staff indicates that the NYSDEC is an involved agency as defined
in SEQR(6 NYCRR Part 617),pursuant to Article 24 Freshwater Wetlands and Article 25 Tidal
Wetlands.
Please be advised the DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming
lead agency for this action as the anticipated impacts are primarily of local significance. The
DEC does,however, reserve the right to comment on the action if a positive determination of
significance is made.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 518-402-9152 for further information or
discussion.
Sincerely,
Timothy R. Cooke
Environmental Analyst 2
cc: J. Pavacic
S. Lorene
C. Arfsten
C\Cooke\Mi]-,oSubdiv.hc/P
o��gpFFO(,(-c0
•
VALERIE SCOPAZh� G'y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
TOWN PLANNER o P.O.Box 1179
y Southold, New York 11971
WO
1, • �'� Fax(616) 765-3136
Telephone(516) 765-1938
OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNER
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
August 30, 2001
Mr. John Milazzo
137 Kings Road
Hauppauge, NY 11788
Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo
SCTM # 1000-53-1-9
Dear Mr. Milazzo:
As part of our environmental review, the Planning Board is coordinating with the
Board of Trustees. As per the attached memorandum, the Trustees will be
conducting a field inspection on September 12, 2001. They have asked that the
freshwater wetland boundaries be staked, along with the perimeter of each of the
proposed structures.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Verb truly yours,
Valerie Scopaz, A CP
Town Planner
VS:ck
encl.
cc: Charles Cuddy, Esq.
Ray Cowan, NYS DEC
Elbert J.Krupeki,President P
Town Hall ✓S
James King,Vice-President 0 53095 Route 25
Henry Smith ='Z` Gy� P.O.Box 1179
Artie Foster O Southold,New York 11971-0959
Ken Poliwoda y Z
Telephone(631) 765-1892
W Fax(631) 765-1366
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Valerie Scopaz—Planning Board
FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr.,President P. —
=- - 2WI
DATE: August 28, 2001 $QaftdTos"
RE: Milazzo Family LLC
In order to determine our jurisdiction in the action described above, we would like to make an
inspection of the property on September 12, 2001, which is our next scheduled inspection date.
Please have the applicant stake the freshwater wetlands and all of the proposed structures.
0-0100 �Jbert J. Krupski, President • gOFFU(�- Town Hall PP5,/ '
James King,Vice-President ��� C� 53095 Route 25 IV/S
Henry Smith =� Gy� P.O. Box 1179
Artie Foster o Southold, New York 11971-0959
y x
Ken Poliwoda Telephone (631) 765-1892
oA O�� Fax(631) 765-1366
dol � �a
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Valerie Scopaz—Planning Board
D
FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President tr8
DATE: August 28, 2001 SOAMTOWrr
RE: Milazzo Family LLC
In order to determine our jurisdiction in the action described above, we would like to make an
inspection of the property on September 12, 2001, which is our next scheduled inspection date.
Please have the applicant stake the freshwater wetlands and all of the proposed structures.
��%'
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
O� D Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR.
Chairman O y� P.O. Box 1179
WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L. EDWARDS �y • �� Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax (631) 765-3136
RICHARD C;4GGIANO
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
2001
AUG 5 7.001
Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request
Dear Reviewer:
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental
Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR
Part 617 the following:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and
3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental
Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response.
Project Name: . M47.74 tm 4 (.CCS _
Requested Action:
Aft
SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I
(� Unlisted
Contact Person: r64-0—
(631) 76,5-1938
a.t'' 3 #qPO BOX 150
/►VS 23 201 Greenport , NY 11944
August 20, 2001
Southold Town
Planning Board
Governor George Pataki
State Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
R7Milazzo Family LLC Subdivision
Dear vernor Pataki :
this letter is to inform you that we have a very serious
situation beginning to develop on Pipes Neck Road in
Greenport .
John and Rose Milazzo have bought 12' acres of land , most of
which is wetlands . Mr . Milazzo proposes a 3-5 house sub-
division on this environmentally sensitive property. He
submitted his application to the DEC in Stony Brook in 1999.
For some reason his application has ended up in Albany. We
think to expedite faster . Mr . Milazzo has bragged numerous
times that he will get all the necessary permits because of
his political connections . Mr . Milazzo' s son is the attorney
for the Suffolk County Water Authority . A letter was sent
to Mr. LoGrande explaining our concerns . Mr . LoGrande
assured us that Mr . Milazzo ' s application, when received , would
be handled by general council for SCWA. I have attached a
copy of Mr . LoGrande ' s letter for your information . I have
also attached a copy of a letter sent to Valerie Scopaz .
She :,is with the Town of Southold Planning Department .
The residents on Pipes Neck Road, Bayshore Road, and Shore
Road have formed the "Committee to Preserve Pipes Cove/Creek.
We feel this entire area warrants preservation. Which brings
me to my next concern. I was always under the impression that
the DEC was to protect all environmentally sensitive property.
This is not the case . It seems that when Mr . Posillico is
involved one way or the other, everyone looks the other way.
Mr . Milazzo bought these 12� acres from Mr . Posillico.
5
Request for information
DATE:—
An
Name (print):
Tel #: 7- D 6 g
SCTM# of site you are inquiring about: 1000-
Comments:
'I f�ef',zt.
For office use only - Staff member:VS RK
MITI T1191
AUG 16 2001
Southold Town
Planning Board
OLG��4 M. TOLE �
36 CAL ESS WA
C�T2�EN7�OR7; NEW�OIcK 12 y-¢Ff R�/ /tI
631 4?,7sg0; 7
0- e S
�- QQ �a oma+
gs
c6c
o. • G�
P
AUG 0 8 2001
Southold Ybwn
(!��nlng.Boafd
�cc , .� 4 �k
cq
,1L� ca,6Of I'l tt"'
LQ (C Py
JZ
W - camalliu 4 "-�uvk � l
atkQ L� vu
� Ec � S
iso �2 I qaq
e �w o ewe a 4e
�s �C "
Qct oss6 � ( s
Sj
4 f :
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport, New York 11944
(631)477 4195
August 9, 2001
Valerie Scopaz AUG 0 9 2001
Planning Department
Town of Southold Soaftld Town
P.O. Box 1179 P�ann BOerd
Southold, New York 11971
REFERENCE: Milazzo Family LLC subdivision
DEC Application number 1-4738-02483!00001
District 1000 Section 53 Block 1 Lot 9
Ms. Scopaz,
We spoke with Mr. Tim Cooke of the Albany Office of NYS DEC who is
processing Mr. Milazzo's subdivision request. Mr. Cooke stated that he is
requiring additional staking of the subdivision to demonstrate where construction
equipment can enter without passing over wetlands. It is Gear that Mr. Cooke is
not considering the many other issues which would be critical to the development
of this fragile ecosystem. Although it may appear to be NIMBY, we have been
advised by organizations (including The Peconic Land Trust, The Audubon
Society, The Nature Conservancy and the North Fork Environmental Council)
that this area is a unique and extremely vulnerable habitat and ecosystem. In
addition, the CPPC is growing exponentially due to concerns of the users of the
Creek and Cove over its fragile nature.
We believe that Mr. Milano is doing an "end run" around the Town of
Southold because of the Town's concerns over the development of this area. In
fact, it has been on your preservation list and has been identified as an Area of
Special Concern,
Some of the specific issues which should be considered BEFORE ANY
GOVERNMENT ACTION is taken are listed below:
MEMBERS: Darlene Capobianco, Frank and Gina Chircop, Irene and Tom Costas, K.C.Coughlin, Barbara
Dai, Padre and Rich DelVecchio,Christine Durkin,Jennifer Durkin, Mary Ann Durkin, Alice and John
Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortunato Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,AI
and Sue Homan,Julia and Timothy Kilcullen, Lynn Mastrota, Steven Minervini, Dennis Palumbo, Aidan and
Eileen O'Reilly, Steven(Larry)Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Rempe, Rick Rempe, Angela Rich, William
Russack, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Olga Tole, Kathleen M. Tole, Wes Van Wallendael
0
1. There is a substantial difference between freshwater indicated on Mr.
Milazzo's survey and those indicated on the New York State Freshwater
Wetlands Map (Southold Quadrangle.) One proposed house, cesspools,
swimming pool and driveway is located directly on the area delineated by the
State as a freshwater wetland. A government agency should survey and stake
the wetlands in order to assess the accuracy of Mr. Milazzo's wetland delineation.
2. The archeological survey (required by DEC and contracted by Mr.
Milano) of the area of construction did not include the areas where excavation
would be done for cesspools and roads. There is substantial anecdotal evidence
from long-term local residents of Native American artifacts easily recovered from
areas throughout this parcel. Artifacts may still be in the possession of some
residents.
3. The area where cesspools are going to be placed consists of mostly Gay,
making permeability very limited. This is documented in the Local Waterfront
Revitalization Program (LWRP) and is attested to by the homeowners on Pipes
Neck.
4. This is part of an Area of Special Concern under the LWRP and, as such,
should receive the highest level of scrutiny before any government approval for
development should be granted.
5. The area being proposed for development is a part of the Peconic Estuary.
Its impact on that ecosystem should also be considered before any government
approval for development is granted.
6. Land elevations should prevent the houses and cesspools from being sited
as indicated on the cluster plan. Two of the houses are being constructed on
land that is between four and six feet lower than the area where the cesspools
are being located. Since the waste fine must begin at three feet below ground,
the outfall into the cesspool will be at least eight feet below ground. The cesspool
beneath the outfall will be almost entirely in the water table.
7. The area has been nominated as a Significant Fish and Wildlife Habitat
with the New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources.
The nomination has the support of the Audubon Society. It is believed that the
area was inadvertently not included in prior nominations.
8. Pipes Creek and its wetlands are the terminal point of Moore's Drain. Paul
Stoutenburgh, a local naturalist and writer, stated that this area should have been
protected. In addition to other concerns, he stated that he has found evidence of
MEMBERS: Darlene Capobianco, Frank and Gina Chircop, Irene and Tom Costas, K.C. Coughlin, Barbara
Dai, Pedre and Rich DelVecchio, Christine Durkin,Jennifer Durkin, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John
Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortunato Peter and Valerie B. Foil, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,AI
and Sue Homan,Julia and Timothy Kilcullen, Lynn Mastrota, Steven Minervini, Dennis Palumbo,Aidan and
Eileen O'Reilly, Steven(Larry) Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Rempe, Rick Rempe, Angela Rich, William
Russack, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Olga Tole, Kathleen M. Tole, Wes Van Wallendael
OF I.
alewives in the confluence of Moore's Drain and Pipes Creek. Alewives are
critical fish in the aquatic food chain in the Peconic Estuary and regional efforts to
preserve them have begun.
Action in favor of this DEC application seems to be in conflict with the
mission of that agency and the local authority of the Town of Southold. THIS
PROCESS MUST BE SLOWED DOWN. ONCE THE WETLAND AND ITS
ASSOCIATED ECOSYSTEM IS DESTROYED, IT CANNOT BE RESTORED.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
CC: Jean Cochran
Southold Town Trustees
Southold Town Preservation Officer
Governor George Pataki
Assemblyman Richard L. Brodsky
Senator Carl L. Maloellino
Tim Cooke, NYS DEC
Richard Capobianco
The Nature Conservancy
The Peconic Land Trust
North Fork Environmental Council
The North Fork Audubon Society
MEMBERS: Darlene Capobianco, Frank and Gina Chircop, Irene and Tom Costas, K.C. Coughlin, Barbara
Dai, Peds and Rich DeNecchio,Christine Durkin,Jennifer Durkin, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John
Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortunato Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,Al
and Sue Homan,Julia and Timothy Kilcullen, Lynn Mastrota, Steven Minervini, Dennis Palumbo,Aidan and
Eileen O'Reilly, Steven(Larry)Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Rempe, Rick Rempe, Angela Rich, William
Russack, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Olga Tole, Kathleen M.Tole, Was Van Wallendael
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �� Qlj Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Chairman �� P.O. Box 1179
WILLIAM J.CREMERS Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDS Q Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. .f. O`� Fax(631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
August 14, 2001
Charles R. Cuddy, Esq.
PO Box 1547
445 Griffing Avenue
Riverhead, NY 11901
RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision of John & Rose Milazzo
SCTM # 1000-53-1-9
Dear Mr. Cuddy:
The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning
Board on Monday, August 13, 2001:
WHEREAS, this proposed subdivision is for 3 lots on 12.5 acres on the north side of
Pipes Neck Road in Greenport; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Board has not accepted or approved the proposed cluster
sketch plan, last revised June 22, 2001, nor the proposed yield plan, last revised May 4,
2001;
WHEREAS, this property is known to contain extensive wetlands;
BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start a coordinated review of
this unlisted action.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Very truly yours,
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �eiff0i,ic
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �0 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Chairman pp� P.O. Box 1179
WILLIAM J.CREMERS ccoo Z Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDS0 • Telephone(631) 765-1938
y
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax(631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
2001
Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request
Dear Reviewer:
The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental
Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR
Part 617 the following:
1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below;
2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and
3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated.
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental
Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response.
Project Name: MlL,Z74 :1 CCS
Requested Action: 01 � �
V —_
SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type 1
(K) Unlisted
Contact Person:
(6 1) 765-1938
Page 2
Lead Agency Coordination Request
The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS)
on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in
writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency.
Planning Board Position:
( ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action.
( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency
status for this action.
( ) Other (see comments below)
Comments: - "v40-x e--
Please feel free to contact this office for further information.
Very truly yours, s �y
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman
# Board of Trustees
Building Department
* Suffolk County Department of Health Services
NYSDEC - Stony Brook
New York State Department of Transportation
* Suffolk County Water Authority
"Maps are enclosed for your review
r t • o�OgpFFO�,j-co
VALERIE SCOPAZ /�� Gy Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
TOWN PLANNER o P.O.Box 1179
N
Southold, New York 11971
�, • �'� Fax(516) 765-3136
Telephone(516) 765-1938
OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNER
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
August 2, 2001
Mr. Ray E. Cowen, Regional Director
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation
SUNY, Building 40
Stony Brook, NY 11790
Re: Milazzo Minor Subdivision
SCT 1000-53-1-9
Dear Mr. Co en:
The attached correspondence has just crossed my desk. Several letters have gone out
from this group to various offices, the Albany Office of the NYS DEC amongst them.
noticed that you are not on any of the cc: lists, so I am sending this, and another recent
letter, to you as a "heads up".
If you have any questions, feel free to e-mail me at:
Valerie.Scooaz((btown.southold nv us
Very truly yours,
Valerie Scopaz, AICP
Town Planner
VS:ck
att.
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport,New York 11844
(631)477 4185
July 27, 2001
Governor George E. Pataki
State Capitol
Albany, New York 12224
Governor Pataki:
We are writing to you to request an investigation into an unusual
occurrence concerning an application for a development proposal which was
submitted to your Department of Environmental Conservation.
Last week the Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek, Greenport, New York,
Town of Southold, contacted the DEC on Long Island to ascertain the status of
an application, the first step in the development of an environmentally sensitive
parcel. We were informed that on 11/15/1999, Mr. John Milazzo submitted an
application to the DEC in Region 1 (Long Island.) At that time,Mr. Milazzo did
not even own the land and did not in fact purchase it until January 31, 2001. We
were informed that the application had left Long Island and had gone to the
Albany office.
We made contact with the Albany office and were told that the application
had languished on Long Island and that some intervention was made to cause
this application to be sent to Albany. A new site inspection was requested by the
person in Albany who is handling it now. He stated that it is difficult to see the
whole picture from so far away.
We contacted our attorney who was equally surprised that this application
had left Long Island. We contacted Town of Southold representatives who were
also surprised that this had happened. So we realized that this was not a
common occurrence and we have decided to ask for your help.
One of the Milazzo family has stated to residents here that they had
political influence and would get this development on sensitive wetland approved.
In fact, the surveyors putting the setback stakes in place said it was a "done
deal".
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foli, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,Al and Sue Homan, Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Rempe, Rick Rempe, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
We are not accusing anyone of corruption but certainly an appearance of
impropriety has been created and has tainted the impartiality of our State DEC.
Local regional oversight has always been a cornerstone of the DEC process and
to see its mandate weakened is extremely upsetting to area residents and to the
many others who are concerned for the Pipes Creek and Pipes Cove Basin
integrity.
This proposal needs to be reviewed on Long Island. This is the area most
directly affected by this application to build three houses, twelve cesspools,
garages, two swimming pools, etc. on fragile freshwater and tidal wetlands.
Please be aware also that we have copied.numerous other correspondence to
you, in particular one dealing with another appearance of impropriety involving
the Suffolk County Water Authority. Mr. Milazzo's son is an attorney for this
Authority and access to public water would be a crucial part of this development.
Please look into this matter as soon as possible.
Thank you for listening to us. We await a response from you.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas,Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Foil, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,At and Sue Homan,Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Rempe, Rids Rempe, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
}
VV Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport,New York 11844
(631)477 4195
Mr. Timothy Cooke
N.Y.S. DEC
625 Broadway
Albany, New York 12233-1750
Ref: MILAZZO FAMILY LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION
APPLICATION# 1.4738-02483100001
DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 53 BLOCK 1 LOT 9
Dear Mr. Cooke,
As per our conversation this morning, I am enclosing copies of letters of
concern that were sent on behalf of the Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek. I
am also enclosing excerpts from the Town of Southold Local Waterfront
Revitalization Program (dated 2001) related to this application.
The prior owner of this land was not permitted to develop on this fragile
ecosystem, so when we learned of the Milazzo subdivision plan which contains
what we perceive as a negative cluster map, we were forced to take action. This
cluster map benefits no one except the developer and would be at the expense of
an irreplaceable environment. The "green" areas it leaves open are areas of
freshwater and tidal wetland which were not developable anyway. There are
problems with elevations, setbacks, rights-of-way and easements. The
environmental significance is partially outlined in the excerpts of the Town
document we have enclosed. We further believe that serious issues of potable
well water sitings and septic sitings exist. Please include our letters in the DEC
application file. We would like time for all environmental reviews to take place.
SLOW IT DOWN is our request.
We are hoping for a positive declaration and a request for a coordinated
review of the environmental impact of this application.
Thank you for listening to us.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,Al and Sue Homan, Steven(Larry)
Reiter,Eleanor and Fred Ramps, Rick Ramps, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, KatNeen M.
Tole
CC: Town of Southold Board
Town of Southold Planning Board
Town of Southold Trustees
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Coates, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortuneto
Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,AI and Sue Homan, Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Romps, Rick Romps, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
• • Page 1 of 1
SLO A POKES
Fran: "SLOVVSPOKES"
To: 4 WULGW YOOPTONLNE•NET'
Sent Wahosday,July 25,2001 8:31 AM
Sub)aot PIPES CREEK
Good McmkV Mary,
VW are members of fis Audubon Society and aro also ferUrate enough to hve in tM mkkft of a birdefe
w,ondviand. The Pipes Croaldites Cars eros a a tour season habitat with a variety Of water and woodland
bvda Shat we tend hard to ini p is in ane place.
We have rooerely become swam of the NYS Dept d State"Signifiow t Fish and Wd is Habitat"p►ow and
have nominated this area tot such designation. Via would aloe a how of support for to designalim from Nre
Aududon Society. The MW should be addressed to.-
GREGORY
oGREGORY CAPOStACO
COASTAL RESOURCES SPECIALIST
N.Y.S.DEPARTMENT OF STATE
41 STATE STREET STHH FLOOR
ALBANY,NY 12231
There a some urgency to ods rowxwt as we have tared flak two is a mous to develop tlm aroa. VW would
Is F , "SI-yaw cott ctim usat your 0~posabls crxww roe to locum,and hopsh+Ny to visit.the area.
ift con be readied at 477
Thw*you-Corniiiaae to Preem"Pipes Croak
AUG 012W1
Southold Town
Board
�nvm
Page 1 of i
SLOMf�POKEB
Am '~nary MAW ' .ttet>
To: "SLOVil8P0 MW
flsnt TusWq.J*31,2001 10:38 PM
BitgNe� Rar PM CREEK
IE Kathy.
Thanks for the mfo. I know where you are Widog about now. We are having a bowl meeting this week. I
woul8lrlee m discuss the issue wsth them. I ag m that this is an ieapormnt area. F�pedaltyr if qdu tieit�
with Moores Woods. There's a swath of undeveloped land in Greenport which runs from Inlet Pond Park
through Moores Woods and wt o Pipes CM& Presaving this valuable ecosystem is an imperative in my
mind.
I'll contact you after the board meeuog
9,
Mary Mulcahy
8/1/01
0
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport,New York 11844
(631)477 4195
July 27, 2001
Governor George E. Pataki
State Capitol
Albany, New York 12224
Governor Pataki:
We are writing to you to request an investigation into an unusual
occurrence concerning an application for a development proposal which was
submitted to your Department of Environmental Conservation.
Last week the Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek, Greenport, New York,
Town of Southold, contacted the DEC on Long Island to ascertain the status of
an application, the first step in the development of an environmentally sensitive
parcel. We were informed that on 11/15/1999, Mr. John Milazzo submitted an
application to the DEC in Region 1 (Long Island.) At that time, Mr. Milazzo did
not even own the land and did not in fact purchase it until January 31, 2001. We
were informed that the application had left Long Island and had gone to the
Albany office.
We made contact with the Albany office and were told that the application
had languished on Long Island and that some intervention was made to cause
this application to be sent to Albany. A new site inspection was requested by the
person in Albany who is handling it now. He stated that it is difficult to see the
whole picture from so far away.
We contacted our attorney who was equally surprised that this application
had left Long Island. We contacted Town of Southold representatives who were
also surprised that this had happened. So we realized that this was not a
common occurrence and we have decided to ask for your help.
One of the Milazzo family has stated to residents here that they had
political influence and would get this development on sensitive wetland approved.
In fact, the surveyors putting the setback stakes in place said it was a "done
deal".
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt, Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,At and Sue Homan, Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Ramps, Rick Rempe, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
We are not accusing anyone of corruption but certainly an appearance of
impropriety has been created and has tainted the impartiality of our State DEC.
Local regional oversight has always been a cornerstone of the DEC process and
to see its mandate weakened is extremely upsetting to area residents and to the
many others who are concerned for the Pipes Creek and Pipes Cove Basin
integrity.
This proposal needs to be reviewed on Long Island. This is the area most
directly affected by this application to build three houses, twelve cesspools,
garages, two swimming pools, etc. on fragile freshwater and tidal wetlands.
Please be aware also that we have copied numerous other correspondence to
you, in particular one dealing with another appearance of impropriety involving
the Suffolk County Water Authority. Mr. Milano's son is an attorney for this
Authority and access to public water would be a crucial part of this development.
Please look into this matter as soon as possible.
Thank you for listening to us. We await a response from you.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,Al and Sue Homan, Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Ramps, Rick Ramps, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
c
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
Michael A.Lo&ande,Chairman Administrative Offices:4060 cSunnse Highway,Oakdale, NY 11760-0801
Melvin M.Fritz,M.D.,Secretary
James Ta.Tripp,Member (631)5685200
Eric J.Russo,Member Fax(831)583.0370
John E.Gee,Jr.,Member July 25, 2001
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
750 Pipes Neck Road x-
Greenport, New York 11944 Pit,
Jul. 3 0 2WI
Re: Subdivision of 12%Acle Parcel at Pim Southold Tbwn
Ladies and Gentlemen: PligAing Board
Thank you for your letter dated July 23, 2001 regarding the above referenced
matter. You should be advised that the Suffolk County Water Authority has a very strict
conflict of interest policy that requires its employees to disclose any potential conflicts of
interest.
Well before the above referenced property was purchased by Milazzo Family LLC,
John Milazzo (son of John and Rose Milazzo),who has been an attorney with the Water
Authority for the last six years, disclosed the contemplated purchase to me. I instructed
that he should have no connection with any application made to the Water Authority for
public water with respect to the subject property and directed that any such application be
handled by our General Counsel,Tim Hopkins.
Currently public water supply is being provided to new subdivisions within the Town
of Southold by the Water Authority only after an appropriate environmental review of the
Project is completed, which must include a full analysis of the impacts to public water
supply. The Water Authority has been working with the Town of Southold to ensure the
an appropriate environmental review is conducted for each new subdivision. Such an
environmental review should also address the wetlands and ecosystem issues discussed
in your letter.
However,the Water Authority only has jurisdiction over public water supply issues.
The Lead Agency for the subdivision of the property would have to be either the Town of
Southold or the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and your
comments regarding wetlands and ecosystem issues should be directed to those agencies.
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek July 25, 2001
. 2-
am a strong advocate of public ownership of environmentally
The Water Authority is always looking for new sitar for supply significant property,
Southold given the limited supply. wells in the Town of
water, it would not be a Considering the subject property's proximity to salt
candidate for acquisition by the Water Authority.
The County of Suffolk and the Town of Southold both have acquisition programs
that may allow for the purchase of this property. In addition, an organization called the
Peconic Land Trust works with Property owners to protect environmentally sensitive
Property. You may wish to contact these entities about public acquisition and/or
establishing a protection program for this property,
1 hope the concerns raised in your letter have been addressed. If you need any
additional information, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
Jv
Michael A. LoGrande
Chairman
MAL:dmm
r
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
Michael A. LoGrande, Chairman Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway,Oakdale, NY 11769-0901
Melvin M. Fritz, M.D., Secretary (631)589-5200
James T.B.Tripp, Member Fax(631) 563-0370
Eric J. Russo, Member July 25, 2001
John E.Gee,Jr., Member
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek `° "� " i t
750 Pipes Neck Road , 'G°
Greenport, New York 11944 JUL 31 2001
Re: Subdivision of 121/2 Acre Parcel at Pipes Creek
Southold Town
Ladies and Gentlemen: Planning Board
Thank you for your letter dated July 23, 2001 regarding the above referenced
matter. You should be advised that the Suffolk County Water Authority has a very strict
conflict of interest policy that requires its employees to disclose any potential conflicts of
interest.
Well before the above referenced property was purchased by Milazzo Family LLC,
John Milazzo (son of John and Rose Milazzo), who has been an attorney with the Water
Authority for the last six years, disclosed the contemplated purchase to me. I instructed
that he should have no connection with any application made to the Water Authority for
public water with respect to the subject property and directed that any such application be
handled by our General Counsel, Tim Hopkins.
Currently public water supply is being provided to new subdivisions within the Town
of Southold by the Water Authority only after an appropriate environmental review of the
project is completed, which must include a full analysis of the impacts to public water
supply. The Water Authority has been working with the Town of Southold to ensure that
an appropriate environmental review is conducted for each new subdivision. Such an
environmental review should also address the wetlands and ecosystem issues discussed
in your letter.
However, the Water Authority only has jurisdiction over public water supply issues.
The Lead Agency for the subdivision of the property would have to be either the Town of
Southold or the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and your
comments regarding wetlands and ecosystem issues should be directed to those agencies.
r
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek July 25, 2001
- 2 -
1 am a strong advocate of public ownership of environmentally significant property.
The Water Authority is always looking for new sites for supply wells in the Town of
Southold given the limited supply. Considering the subject property's proximity to salt
water, it would not be a candidate for acquisition by the Water Authority.
The County of Suffolk and the Town of Southold both have acquisition programs
that may allow for the purchase of this property. In addition, an organization called the
Peconic Land Trust works with property owners to protect environmentally sensitive
property. You may wish to contact these entities about public acquisition and/or
establishing a protection program for this property.
1 hope the concerns raised in your letter have been addressed. If you need any
additional information, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
Michael A. LoGrande
Chairman
MAL:dmm
cc: Stephen Jones, CEO
Honorable Robert Gaffney, County Executive
Honorable Jean Cochran, Supervisor
Southold Town Trustees
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Preservation Office
NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation
Eric Bressler, Esq.
Peconic Land Trust
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Nock Road
Greenport,New York 11944
(631)477 4195
Mr. Timothy Cooke
N.Y.S. DEC
625 Broadway
Albany, New York 12233-1750
Ref: MILAZZO FAMILY LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION
APPLICATION# 1.4738-02483/00001
DISTRICT 1000 SECTION 53 BLOCK 1 LOT 9
Dear Mr. Cooke,
As per our conversation this morning, I am enclosing copies of letters of
concern that were sent on behalf of the Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek. I
am also enclosing excerpts from the Town of Southold Local Waterfront
Revitalization Program (dated 2001) related to this application.
The prior owner of this land was not permitted to develop on this fragile
ecosystem, so when we learned of the Milazzo subdivision plan which contains
what we perceive as a negative cluster map, we were forced to take action. This
cluster map benefits no one except the developer and would be at the expense of
an irreplaceable environment. The "green" areas it leaves open are areas of
freshwater and tidal wetland which were not developable anyway. There are
problems with elevations, setbacks, rights-of-way and easements. The
environmental significance is partially outlined in the excerpts of the Town
document we have enclosed. We further believe that serious issues of potable
well water sitings and septic sitings exist. Please include our letters in the DEC
application file. We would like time for all environmental reviews to take place.
SLOW IT DOWN is our request.
We are hoping for a positive declaration and a request for a coordinated
review of the environmental impact of this application.
Thank you for listening to us.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze, Al and Sue Homan, Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Rempe, Rick Ramps, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
CC: Town of Southold Board
Town of Southold Planning Board
Town of Southold Trustees
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,Al and Sue Homan, Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Ramps, Rick Ramps, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
rn5
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Neck Road
Greenport,New York 11944
(931)477 4195
July 23, 2001
Michael LoGrande, Chairman
Suffolk County Water Authority
4060 Sunrise Highway
Oakdale, New York 11769
Dear Mr. LoGrande,
We are writing as concerned residents of the Pipes Neck Creek and Pipes
Cove area of Greenport, New York. We believe that you will be equally
concerned over the obvious appearance of impropriety of a representative of the
Water Authority.
There has been a recent purchase of 12 Y2 acres off Pipes Neck Road by
John and Rose Milazzo (retitled to the Milazzo Family LLC.) This land is an
extremely fragile and irreplaceable ecosystem in a beautiful and unique area.
The land is largely freshwater recharge areas and tidal wetlands. It shares the
common characteristics and ecosystem with the Arshamomaque Basin and
Moore's Drain which are designated "Areas of Special Concern" in the Town of
Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan.
This area should be publicly owned and its rarity and fragility are obvious
to anyone looking at it. Mr. Milazzo was aware of this also. In fact, prior to his
purchase of the property, one of his environmental consultants told him of its
incompatibility with development; Mr. Milazzo then apparently hired another
consultant.
Our issues are twofold:
First, Mr. Milazzo told one of the residents that he has political influence in
this area. He implied that this influence would result in the approval of the
development of this land. Now we believe that Mr. Milazzo's father is an attorney
for the Suffolk County Water Authority.
Second, it was our understanding that there was a moratorium on new
water hookups and no extensions of water to new subdivisions. We also
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt, Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze, AI and Sue Homan, Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Rempe, Rick Rempe, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
Ar
believed that there had to be a showing that a well was possible in a subdivision
before the Authority would consider any exception to their rule. We don't believe
this test can be appropriately met.
Mr. Milazzo's cluster plan calls for 12 cesspools and public water. This
cluster plan is not environmentally friendly. In fact, it places two houses, one with
a swimming pool, on extremely small lots directly on the waterfront. The third
subdivision is sitting perched around freshwater and tidal wetland, also with a
swimming pool! It is an egregious plan that requires your Authority's direct
involvement in order to get approval. Today we were told that there is a Mr.
Milazzo in your employ and that it is he who is responsible for approvals for new
hookup to the Water Authority service. We were also told that such a hookup
was denied to another proposed new home in the area.
We ask that you look into this matter. No one should use their influence to
besmirch the reputation of your office. We also are asking to SLOW/T DOWN.
Please be part of this effort. We expect that the appropriate environmental
review process will take place prior to any development of this area. We have
been told that you would normally be an enthusiastic supporter of any effort to
assure the environment is protected before any development takes place.
Thank you for listening to us. We would appreciate your comments on this
matter.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
CC: Stephen Jones, CEO
County Executive Robert Gaffney
Supervisor Jean Cochran
Southold Town Trustees
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Preservation Office
New York State DEC
Eric Bressler, Esq.
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt, Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foil, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,Al and Sue Homan, Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Rempe, Rick Rempe, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
/7JS
Arshamomaque
750 Pipes Nock Road
Greenport, New York 11844
(631)477 4195
July 23, 2001
Southold Town Trustees
Town Hall
53095 State Route 25
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Re: District 1000 Section 53 Block 1 Lot 9
Dear Sirs,
Area. We are concerned residents of the Pipes Creek and Pipes Cove Basin
At issue for us is the destruction of a unique ecosystem in the Town of
Southold. The creek and surrounding property is one of the only undeveloped
and largely undisturbed of all your creeks. The cove and creek is home to
thriving clam beds, huge populations of fiddler crabs and populations of blue claw
crabs. (We have attached a letter sent to the Supervisor which names many
more waterfowl and birds, both threatened and otherwise).
As you are aware, John and Rose Milazzo (retitled the Milazzo Family
LLC) have recently purchased 12 Y2 acres in this area. They have submitted both
yield and cluster maps indicating their intent to build 3 houses, 2 swimming pools,
2 docks and a "studio" sitting directly on top of the wetlands in Pipes Creek! Two
of the houses are on the waterfront with the most minimal setbacks to its
neighbors and the third house is wedged in a small oasis of reduced setbacks
between sensitive freshwater and tidal water wetlands. The site also involves
right of way and easement issues. Mr. Milazzo's cluster map is to no one's
advantage but his own. This cluster map involves 12 Y2 acres and puts all the
development on environmentally sensitive waterfront and/or wetland.
In this case we are hard put to understand how any of this is possible. We
do not believe any variances or considerations of reduced setbacks should be
forthcoming to his application and we will explain our position.
You are the guardians of our land and water. This is an old and honored
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Fob, Ignatia E. Fob, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,Al and Sue Homan,Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Ramps, Rick Rempe, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
position. In this case you are not dealing with issues of heredity. This land was
not handed down through generations. There are no issues of"grandfathering" in
any of this. In fact, the man who sold this land to Mr. Milazzo could not get
approvals to build houses here. Mr. Milazzo still chose to buy this landl He
bought it in the 21st Century not at a time when no one knew how fragile the
environment is. Now he appeals to you for relief to make money on land that
should never be developed. He was not duped! One of his own environmental
consultants told him he couldn't build here. He apparently found another
consultant that said he could. We have the name of the company who gave him
a negative report and who told one of the neighbors that he didn't even know why
he was back again since he had nothing but bad news for Mr. Milazzo!
We have all lost money recently on Wall Street. We chose to put our
money there. IBM, Intel, and all those other companies we invested in are not
offering us relief because we made a bad investment. Mr. Milazzo knowingly
made a bad investment. It is not your job to give the Milazzo Family LLC a
profit on a bad investment!
Mr. Milazzo also told the residents that he"knows a lot of people,"
reference was made to a connection with the Water Authority. He said he would
put as many houses up as he could and that he would get approved. He also told
residents that he would take down old and beautiful trees .
The Milazzo Family was, and is, fully aware of how sensitive this land is.
DEC permits were applied for on 11/15/1999 before they even owned the
property!!! This DEC process has left the Long Island region and is now being
handled in Albany-we wonder why that has occurred and we are attempting to
get an answer to that since we have been advised that it is unusual to say the
least. At the July 16, 2001 Planning Board work session, Mr. Cuddy (attorney for
the Milazzo Family LLC) declined the Board's suggestion that he apply to the
Town Trustees now. We understood Mr. Cuddy's comments to indicate that he
would wait for NYS DEC approval with the expectation that the Trustees would
then approve whatever the DEC approved.
Many of you and other Town employees know this area. Many of you
have clammed it, kayaked or fished it. If you haven't seen it recently, come out
during the week and walk it. Its beauty is breathtaking and irreplaceable. It is
part of the Ashamomaque Basin and Moore's Drain, Areas of Special Concern in
the recently completed Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan.
We are asking you to assume the role of lead agency for a SEQR positive
declaration with a coordinated review. Our motto is SLOW/T DOWN. Let all the
experts weigh in. If all the agencies involved in a coordinated review give you
positive feedback, so be +t. If not, you have helped save an irreplaceable part of
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt, Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Foti, Ignatia E. Foti, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,AI and Sue Homan, Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Ramps, Rick Rempe, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
our Town.
Thank you for listening to us.
Sincerely,
Committee to Preserve Pipes Creek
ATT: Correspondence to Spvsr. Cochran, dated July 16, 2001
CC: Supervisor Jean Cochran
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Preservation Office
Eric Bressler, Esq.
MEMBERS: Irene and Tom Costas, Mary Ann Durkin,Alice and John Eckardt,Jean Eckardt, Fortunato
Peter and Valerie B. Foil, Ignatia E. Fob, Betty Hintze, Henry Hintze,Al and Sue Homan, Steven(Larry)
Reiter, Eleanor and Fred Ramps, Rick Ramps, Angela Rich, Brian and Maryanne Russell, Kathleen M.
Tole
07/16/2001 15:32 FAX 631 477 3608 KATHY/MARY ANN /�V
fdj001
i F
ly 16, 2001 . 1
Supervisor Jean Cochran JUL 18 2001 4
Town of Southold
Southold, New York 11971 Southold Town
By facsimile. 631 765 1823 Planning Board 3 c
We are homeowners on Pipes Neck Road and Brooks Road, Greenport, h
New York. Our homes are located near or on Pipes Cove and Pipes Cove
Creek. We are surrounded by tidal wetr+ands and fresh water recharge areas.
Our creek is home to nesting osprey, fishing osprey, blue heron, great
egrets, white egrets, common tem, least tem, lesser yellowlegs, common loon,
yellow crowned night heron, green heron, kingfishers, sharp shinned hawks,
cooper hawks, greater black backed gulls, herring gulls, swans, mallards and an
extensive variety of songbirds. We have even had the erratic spotting of piping
plover.
Our creek also provides a safe haven for a large population of wintering
American black ducks, mergansers and bufflehead. We have smaller
concentrations of scaups, golden eye, American widgeon and old squaw_
Of all species currently threatened or endangered, 54% are found in
wetlands and coastal water habitats.
We have a healthy creek and cove bottom which is home to thriving Gam
beds and blue claw crabs. This is due in no small part to the lack of development
on this creek and cove.
The pristine and unique nature of this area qualified it as a Suffolk County
critical environmental area since at least 1990. We are also filing an application
with New York State Division of Coastal Resources for this area's designation as
a Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat.
For the last two years, 12+acres surrounding this area were for sale. Mr.
John Milazzo was in contract with Mr. Posilico for this time. Mr. Milazzo's private
environmental consultant told one of us that he told Mr. Milano that he could not
build in the wetlands with the fresh water recharge and DEC setbacks, etc.
Mr. Posilico was interested in selling this land to the Town of Southold.
We also urged the Town to buy the land. Mr. Mik=is now the owner of this
fragile property for a more$110,0001 We have found out that he has tiled fora 3
way subdivision with two swimming pools and two docks. Mr. Mils=told some
of the residents that'he knows a lot of politicians and he has a lot of Influence.'
He said he will 'build as many houses as he can." In fact, he told Craig Turner
<,' ✓
CHARLES R.CUDDY T/
ATTORNEY AT LAW
445 GRIFFING AVENUE
RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK
Mailing Address: TEL: (631)369-0200
P.O. Box 1547 FAX: (631)369-9080
Riverhead, NY 11901 E-mail: crcuddy@earthlink.net
June 25, 2001 r/
Planning Board
Town of Southold '
Main Road � �, i / WE✓�
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Milazzo Subdivision
Pipes Neck Road, Greenport, NY 11944
Gentlemen:
In connection with the above minor subdivision application,
enclosed please find:
1. 11 cluster sketch plans
2 . 11 yield sketch plans
3 . Transactional disclosure form
4 . Copy of deed recorded 5/10/01
5. Environmental Assessment - Long Form
6. Checks payable to the Town of Southold in the amounts of
$500 and $1500.
Please proceed to formally consider this application and advise
when the applicant may meet with the Board to review this proposal.
Very truly yours,
Charles R. Cuddy
Enclosures
CRC:cg
JUN 29 2001
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR.
Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Chairman P.O. Box 1179
WILLIAM J.CREMERS Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDS Telephone(631) 765-1938
GEOR Hy�f� Fax (631) 765-3136
RICHARD CA GIAN0
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May 30, 2001
Charles Cuddy, Esq.
P.O. Box 1547
Riverhead, NY 11901
RE: Milazzo minor subdivision
SCTM# 1000-53-1-9
Dear Mr. Cuddy,
The Planning Board requests that the following changes be made to the maps:
1. Full 100' setback lines from all tidal and freshwater wetlands in all directions.
This should include the wetlands on the property of now/formerly William A.
Reiter.
2. The docks should be removed from the sketch map unless they have permits
from the Town Trustees.
Along with the revised maps, you should submit an application for the subdivision and a
$500 fee to start our environmental review. The Planning Board does not want to make
any decisions on the subdivision map until it has been reviewed by our environmental
consultant. The SEQR process will be undertaken before the map will be ready for
sketch plan approval.
Sincerely,
A4L�-
Craig Turner
Planner
CHARLES R.CUDDY
J
ATTORNEY AT LAW L
445 GRI FFING AVENUE
RIVERHEAD,NEWYORK
Malin Address: TEL: (631)369-8200
P.O. Box 1547 FAX: (631)369-9080
Riverhead, NY 11901 E-mail: crcuddy@earthlink.net
May 11, 2001
HAND DELIVEREDF
Craig Turner, Planner D
Southold Town Planning Board
PO Box 1 179
Southold, NY 11971-0959
Re: Milazzo Subdivision SoutholdTown
Plennlnq Bwd
Dear Mr. Turner:
Enclosed please find 5 (five) prints of the yield sketch plan as well as 5 (five) prints
ofthe cluster sketch plan, both dated 5/4/01. These have been revised in accordance
with our discussion before the Board. Would you please review these plans and
advise if they are satisfactory so that we may submit a formal application.
Very truly yours,
Charles R. Cuddy
Encs.
CRC:cg
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS QSUFFO��'
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. =,r�� y Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Chairman J� P.O. Box 1179
WILLIAM J.CREMERS H Z Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDS of Telephone (631) 765-1938
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Fax (631) 765-3136
RICHARD CAGGIANO
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
May 1, 2001
Howard Young, L.S.
Young& Young Land Surveyors
400 Ostrander Ave.
Riverhead, NY 11901
RE: Milazzo minor subdivision
SCTM# 1000-53-1-9
Dear Mr. Young,
As a follow-up to last night's work session, the Planning Board is requesting that the
yield map be revised to include the following information:
1. 100' setbacks from tidal wetlands
2. 100' setback from wetlands to the west of Lot 3
3. Scale should be V = 100'
4. Surveyor should certify that all building envelopes are at least 850 sq. ft.
The Planning Board will further review the subdivision layout after the Trustees have
inspected the site and made their recommendations. You should contact them to make
the necessary arrangements.
Sincerely,
41r�
Craig Turner
Planner
cc: Charles Cuddy, Esq.
CHARLES R.CUDDY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
445 GRI FFING AV ENL E
RIVERHEAD,NEW YORK
Mailmo Address TEL: (631)369-5200
P.O.Box 1547 FAX: (631)369-9050
Riverhead,NY 11901 E-mail: crcuddy@eartlrlinl.net
April 18 , 2001
Planning Department
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road
PO Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971 APR 20 2001
Attn: Craig Turner
Southold Town
Re: Milazzo - Southold Subdivision phyllift
Dear Mr. Turner:
Enclosed herewith are two (2) prints each of the Cluster
and Yield Sketch Plans in the above, all dated March 30,
2001. We would like to request that this matter be
discussed with the Planning Board at its next work
session.
Very --truly yours,
lYG2�� CF,1_
Charles R. Cuddy
Enclosures
CRC:cg
LASER FICHE FORM
SUBDIVISIONS
SCANNED
OCT - 2 2006
Protect Type: Minor Records Management
Status: Expired
SCTM # : 1000 - 53.-1-9
Project Name: Milazzo. John & Rose
Location: The property is located on Pipes Creek and bordered on north by
LIRR tracks and on west by Pipes Cove in Greenport
Hamlet: Greenport
Applicant Name: John & Rose Milazzo
Owner Name: Milazzo Family LLC
Zone 1 : R-80
Approval Date:
PLAT Signed Date: l�fo�j
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A date indicates that we have received the related information
Zone 2: Zone 3:
Cand R's :
Homeowners Association
R and M Agreement:
Address:
County Filing Date:
SCAN Date:
49
Z'o'+,eng & Young, Land Surveyors an�z
401) Ostrander A'Uenve, Riverhead, New York 11901 �J
631-727-2303 ano2
LOCATION MAP
SCALE 1" = 600' Alden W. Young, P.L. k' L.S. (1508—/884) n
1 Hovu a.rd W Yov.np, 1.orLd Svarne1)nm t3O
Thomas C. HIdperl, Professional Lnyv..Ar'
L,
ADDS CURFE
o ,
l % p
�V .
x m 'A
DRAfu ��s s9r L'D"A�Or°r aFo
/ Ne`P �C/°o�P
e ,% ✓ / i1 e,�R Fl Re^
BILI 111111
DOE 2
W5
i c-
' Y r` /� ✓ r�/' ' SITE DATA
� s6'b'i TOTAL AREA = 12.5253 ACRES
To
�xnl • TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS = 3
e�
� ZONING USE DISTRICT = R-00
.e" 'r y"/i �I
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS CLUSTER
"SRATWcs" (i '¢ REVEL NTIAL) SHALL CONFORM IC THE RR (RESORT
, K ,�N J RESIDENTIAL ZONING USE DISTRICT. E%CEPT THAT THE MINIMUM
/ y n»ry b // � ✓ ✓////j j/; l ?m /f FRONT YARD SHALL BE 25 FEET. °
_/r+ � ,, � ! � x /✓✓7"x/ / ✓ 4a� •DO
THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED IN FIRM ZONE 'AE' BASE ELEVATION B
rL= AS INDICATED ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL NUMBER
Ye `g° 360813 0159 G LAST DATED MAY 4, 1998
i
VERTICAL DAVM = N.G.V DATUM (M.S L 7929)
.sdp / 2
W A
" i/ a% f:- IJ � � �/ �� ✓ � �°err � M
ns�
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION =_
k w ,
y / $ ✓J NO,v ✓/ r! • THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING SURVEYS COMPLETED BY ase
I
�..,J� z`�✓ / i //��j/% % / IP .t. US IN 1999. CONTOURS AND CERTAIN TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA ARE e"P
s C�yF.F' FROM 5 EASTERN TOWN MAPS PREPARED FOR THE COUNTY OF �w
SUFFOLK
UC OC
l YJ ppW ' �//�f ��� �' /__ — __ /,W ^\ ��T� U, ^�'*�✓�/'4n^—�!`-�•� Y
j
iR m ` ' / ✓ z . rya, yh �"14 , HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. N0. 45893 fin 4589 �O o
TEST HOLE �YSFD SPA
E AN
m.J�m�.'� _ ��
Lot
1 ',,�rm1�
S'
r .wt f / : °o.
w� 1 55�.a„5522.d.o �s Y TH1
a OWNER
r eEWc, sa zA � �)� � D o
RtWp, '":"wG�A - 6th BROWN LOAM
7,t `p• mW pL JOHN P. MILAZZO & ROSE L MILAZZO s'J
x' '' O o. 4 -- z.0RD
' 137 KINGS ROAD p' Ia`L
µ.` Be �.S' i '�Y3 pp• pF W� '�_�j e* '// N' LOAMY SNrv° �oPB
6g v W v .E SM HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 s
c€,,'pJ"w� _ 30
' h E... O/ Y '� 3 WAR I' 1✓,. J/ y'� ,S /� �i14' PALEBROWN C�mW
SA, ^ l b'ti 15 BB' eMgN }- ao. %t`�� y5 � FINE TO o0e
'✓n .'•,rTy , I U o L' i$' Z'/� MEDIUM SAND 2`E
sP — 70 '�
BROWN
S4sm'p0
MINOR SUBDIVISION PREPARED FOR°78 $ SANDY Y
WATERIN
aZmF DY JOHN P. MILAllO & ROSE L. MILAllO
ovak 99 SA CLAY
G L y
Z/; Pos,lllc°) 5 y B° At Greenport, Town of Southold
WATER IN
Q�16 P"FIJISR-- Suffolk County, New York
LB OM
TO
R L
County Tax Map mEmu 1000 s«eon 53 D—F 01 Loi 9
CLUSTER SKETCH PLAN
INSPECTION STAKEOUT DRAWING °
FEB 4, 2002
OCT. 9, 2001
I AUG. 16, zoDt
M p pp JUNE 22, 2001 acMAY 4, 2001 s
MIAR 1p 2BU� �— AAP PREPARED APR. 9, 2001 �ae�
p p c
�:➢�:I1::611DYCII �yyLYIIW SPALE 1" = 100' ISD
III , JOB NO. 1999-0161 .1N
L] yprvuAmrvr =[r 0 - YONUNwT FOUNDp SNAKE FLT A "ADD FDUND 0< INSPECTION STAKE PREVIOUSLY SIT DR PROPOSED In BE so C 0_ppyp4Ltil�-" �.amYr4'et.Y, INR DWG. 990161_mspectlon_so `�
Rd>o
Young & Young, Land Surveyors gIi;
400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 11901
631-727-2303 o 'c
LOCATION MAP Alden W. Young, ung & L.S. umeyo 994) 9 s
SCALE 1° = 600' Howard W. ert, Land Serve or
% Thomas C. WDLpert, Professional Engineer
i
/
i
/
i
/
/
/ � o
i
x +
i
/?/// "oINR
SITE DATA ,00
TOTAL AREA = 12.5253 ACRES aF-g
PPEE CREEK /
(FN
TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS = 3
% R/o' • E>�3
go\
o ° e3si
� NG USE DISTRICT = R8D a
i Thi 'x ar 'r 'n r r / er C_o ZONING - €�
PIPES covE
r hev % H�3o sy • VERTICAL DATUM = N.G.V. DATUM (M.S.L. 1929) �Fte
n t €tee
• THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED IN FIRM ZONE 'AE' BASE ELEVATION a
AS INDICATED ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL NUMBER }A
PIPES CREEK voce rr+:'/ l\ \x �>, 360813 0159 G LAST DATED MAY 4, 1998. @�.0
re
.•via ',=�%'_ -
ENEEIII NLnANDs
�G��yy� M` /'r
� � M,s � At fPEEHWRfER WC]LAN96 �� l 6,y ����
G� + •� / 1( wA�wwx¢ 1 LOT AREAS
DonrvEA�Eo er 1Ef EEr LUSEECMAN T
f' 1 i A cE srnL Exhe°xMv�n
ORPDRAn
\ `ax ADD u, 1999 k v�eDn UC s �i A ,il • LOT
�s mREncE ON EEenuenr Is z 1
./�f. TOTAL AREA = 121,538 Sq Ft. or 2.7901 Ac.
/rr�y'.o " �`� 'P�> yg RIGHT OF WAY AREA = 30,503 Sq. Ft. or 07003 Ac.
WETLANDS AREA = 7,485 Sq. Ft. or 0.1718 Ac.
NET AREA = 83,550 Sq. Ft. or 1.9180 Ac
� ' � — _ __ -
r � V \
C, GT 2
AL AREA -
44,020 Sq Ft or 3.3062 Ac.
ot
rr'rf d{>c '1 s a�2ea°3. / 1 §p�T m � RIGHT OFTWAY AREA =114076 Sq. Ft. or 03231 Ac. o
eAm. =
- ""�`y -\'` \� u WETLANDS AREA = 46,993 Sq. Ft. or 1.0788 Ac.
NET AREA = 82,951 Sq. Ft. or 1.9043 Ac
TOAL AIDIA5 DzunsnmD R`Y'-L-c..�, 1 / S} O1y • LOT 3
woos I T JEFFREY L SEEMAN Or ED AL ENNRDNMORTAL _
D°RpDRAPDN ON S1NE 25.1999 k'EDUEN n 5 Ft. or
1 nDll ) i r{T TOTAL
AREA
AR A =2132,0114 Sq. Ft. or 30329 Ac.
1 'I? vf1IRE 1 LFEENC,OR Fee. 1 Is,2aa -Lr / .i 9.N^i` q'
sr' N�' BN QQO W e'
f se/r iALI�� 1v 'y ���,t�ti „E6y NET AREA = 147,929 Sq. Ft. or 3.3960 Ac.
za r 1 0-
o- , ._ - / A• 'y_` wu-wEnexos
IN
` �9`Z•Kb 6N§$
Lot 2 '�sy° ,Uo"
o , H,. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
i r�� \ ]Dfi]°on
J - 'r F i e R 'I ee� W (fv�` • THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING SURVEYS COMPLETED BY � N'
?4D�. FPEDHWAIER WEIUNDS RODNDARIES�'� 1y._ j v €�'AMym
s DeunEArtD R.Urrx+EY E -,_r-•,,,,,E,_„.-��-.,� m US IN 1999. CONTOURS AND CERTAIN TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA ARE
_ ____ _ _ FROM 5 EASTERN TOWN MAPS PREPARED FOR THE COUNTY OF
SOPPED Dr CD ON ONE NY1RON gwrAL j �°.2• ( N �S
COR ORIFlTER°N E 45 1 9 k
-er s LDRwcE Ce J`` - /` s''ir �L SUFFOLK. It
iEDRUARv Iz, z°m � �� \e K, � a
•W �'�r8•k / , �'t b � �W ����r ,1
'4 -' Jr
' 1 . � §r aulwlxa wvaoNE J
- f� -I.e]a.n. n. JJ'> ` K
L 00 W 1 wesAWATER ` .'-AND �/� } „i / � lr o * = Ol
i. $ / A i Lot 1 4./ `'/ P'�PO rp”� . e hA ° o a'I'c� n- f
4,
'r �._._. ,._.� / Izls]e wel. t �^i__�.�"a�T i o° `E 0 e\�i 1 , i 1/
k'` ti ,.,4 ° °F, HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. LS. NO. 45893 P 4 93
„ 58
LAND
OWNER
°4 Q .� ",tom �T _8 a �'o.
N>JZJoo qra WAy=____`__ � n yt y3 ?� JOHN P. MILAZZO & ROSE L. MILAZZO ��O
p7 £ n g o" •� ----- / `4.'4a$�^°' q i C'oQa� 137 KINGS ROAD
pFas ,t" . HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788
'Y��Y
I If
545'01'OO.W /iJ B' y 6€0
Q.
201
Ntss• co a` 3¢;�m naw Orfor ''
D 19NatiD E FotirlY 'Ue 6� " �F'� MINOR SUBDIVISION PREPARED FORvo
w a° _ ormerly PDs01 c) y `� JOHN P. MILAllO & ROSE L. MILAllO
- \168
Q
--------
--- At Greenport, Town of Southold
Suffolk County, New York
County Tax Map Dist—t 1000 sectp- 53 emEx Ol LOT 9
c
YIELD SKETCH PLAN
N
MAY 4, 2001 g,rrOH
MAY 14 2001 MAP PREPARED APR. 9, 2001 pa€e
fi€q:
SCALE 1" = 100' YJI' aoa;
Southold Town JOB NO 1999-0161 34 �
U = MONUMENT SET ■ MONUMENT FOUND A = STAKE SET ♦= STAKE FOUND Planning 8esod
DWG. 990161_yleld_IDOs
N.
iy
Young & Young, Land Surveyors g4;
� 400 Ostrander Avenue, Riverhead, New York 1190/ 9�8�
631-727-2303 e
LOCATION MAP I / - • Aiden W. Young, P.E. & L.S. (1908-1994) g-
ry �ESe
w
SCALE 1" 600' I Howard W. Young, Land Surveyor
= \ - - S 00 Thmnas C Wolper(, Prefeasvonat Eugeneer
�1 ♦ \ \ O h-
} S
0aZF
oP s3,4 _ _ �i�o�e Lo Fo _
f
o�y
000 1\
�X�/ X07
i
10
l6I .IIWAFFk WI TI AIID —
f i� t
j ��
F b
�C
� g
��/ FRFSHWA TCI: WF TI AHC`, d fi^
SUBDIVISION � -�-- � �
SITE DATA � a
/ 1 F I RE=, IwATLF wETLAUE IDAnIE°E A / TOTAL AREA 12.5253 ACRES P32e
FE NEATEII bi IFIFRE L StMAN
;;,I oNLF M.IF -[JIFI[ N.AERO IEr]I- , l .S\ • �8y`z
G
\ _ — A 'I � - ` - .� TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS = 3
- � 1 � L ,kel, � �N rLnRUAFI zuol �
� t ��, ^J� • ZONING USE DISTRICT = R-80
k56`C _ — / I/ -- _ _ A l� /i �.T� • VERTICAL DATUM = N.G.V. DATUM (M.S.L. 1929) se
�5 I \ I / • THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED IN FIRM ZONE 'AE' BASE ELEVATION 8 Alin
AS INDICATED ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL NUMBER Els
360813 0159 G LAST DATED MAY 4, 1998.
NIiI
I
I
LOT AREAS -
O � • LOT
/ TOTAL AREA = 121,520 Sq Ft or 27897 Ac.
RIGHT OF WAY AREA 31,513 Sq. Ft. or 0.7234 Ac.
WETLANDS AREA = 8,390 Sq FL or 0.1926 Ac.
NET AREA = 81,617 Sq. Ft. or 1.8737 Ac.
Lot 3 1 i IILAL NI II 'NI, 16IIINIIM, Ab 1141IN' AIIn HV'' ` /E1 � v1 • LOT 2
IEFLFLI I ' LLMAN „F )V 1,A1 rrl,iF,IrI At I
280 045 s ft v, I A_'� TOTAL AREA = 144,038 S Ft or 3.3067 Ac.
O - I q L„�F'PIift A TILM UN JUNE LR, 19p0 F' VLI01 0 9Y ` - / q o
I �n 6A289 acres I �F CNSE uN FFBRIL an f L', X001 / :3` RIGHT OF WAY AREA 13,079 Sq. Ft. or 0,3003 Ac.
WETLANDS AREA 45,752 Sq. Ft. or 1.0503 Ac.
NET AREA — 85,207 Bq. Ft. or 1.9561 Ac.
X22 SN�^��' • LOT 3
TIDAL WC TI_AP;D
\ TOTAL AREA = 280,043 Sq Ft. or 64289 Ac.
\ ' S es. 6
/ 'E 60 �6 'L1 S WETLANDS AREA = 132Sq. Ft. or 30329 Ac.
/ - Nj700 hB I a2, y, 69 12 � NET AREA = 147,929929 Sq. Ft. or 33960 Ac.
/ 532 g2 V Sg5 48
o / Lot 2 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION 4gs�
144,038 sq.ft, io o • THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING SURVEYS COMPLETED BY
b / 3 3067 acres 1 aim US IN 1999. CONTOURS AND CERTAIN TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA ARE BWe
r t
FROM 5 EASTERN TOWN MAPS PREPARED FOR THE COUNTY OF
v ul IL t-rI II,L nI n - ;o gds
uO / h / / EU 'L 11 F Di &I F _ L I EMa I a' AL` 'Svc SUFFOLK
ILII wo ri TAl IF r u �4 iuul ,y �-
� / / N6832'54'W d, IFII L Id Ni_E ;IN F; ! r.b i I_. to / - �5 �2-
0
_ C', �
3 O / DU' / 32029' I — — _ _ — _ ___ / d �A. J
[ - // �� / •� 1 _ ��/ r9�J %10
/ PRppO
D RiGhT
OF K,Ay I X �/ sod, - - ` �/� ��� HOWARD W YOUNG, NYS LS NO, 45893 0
EFL _hwnu F � -
A\ o
0
~<o o`�ot�, 1 OWNER
Lot _ �;° /ye �h� oty-o e� toQL JOHN P. MILAZZO & ROSE L. MILAZZO §gyp
121.520 sq.fL - �� 2 '6 � oc 0 I 137 KINGS ROAD 5NEP
N _ Y HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788
.A ti� J �/ O�G A �'� ea
�. `� l— - - 2 7897 acres o O et '
E A ll�� Is, F�yo, Ir
�r�s
r' o <u _ 66J;oG•P' // / F MINOR SUBDIVISION PREPARED FOR Q�B
� �
+s JOHN P. MILAllO & ROSE L. MILAllO
3 � 3 R/GHToF / _ �o soup °' o����- At Greenport, Town of Southold
00"N, WAY - - -=�_�_ - .// 'r n yy- v� r; / ' �P � 20 2001 Suffolk County, New York
, � 0 0,
034s .t a ee� Southold Town
° o o
p 9g' Planning Board
-c T,>, F 07 County Tax MOP D.:t-t 1000 S-k- 53 Block Ol Loi 9
o
�� Ps,39 AFS 2p rw oa o c oo s � � 5ti
YIELD
SKETCH PLAN
585'010 ,5 .0 0w) RES'
1 I Q 20 78• —
r w
Ro c4 a o o Ignotlor for Qss ! PRIN .
..l Angelo E. Foti & '�,�';�'j`'
� / / M' FOtI h� MAP PREPARED APR. 9, 2001 ��M$
1 (tOr
merl / 5 ,
Y p OSIllICO) pit
YSPe
SCALE 1" = 60'
Q\ JOB N990161—yield-60s
9 199—yield
■ „�muuon r��wr A - v'A;r crr ♦- „.; ....,nn `
- DWG 990161_Neld_60s
SURVEY OF PROPERTY
N
PREPARED FOR
JOHN P. AULAZZO & ROSE L. MILAZZO
SITUATE: GREENPORT
TOWN: SOUTHOLD /
O �
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
SUFFOLK GOUI\ITY TAX IF
i
/
loot I-q-55- b. o„
\
_�
P
r b
- 011-02-02
V YED
SUR I_ n
PROPOSLD REV 0412-03
I
Q Y
O
OI 1 1
� c -
I °- � r
- 1- IhI 1
pp _ •r E � 3 h
� I
FF EII L-T=F' I II I
_ I _ -Ilr_
O
Sollll,olo wv,n
F OF
0 /
Cm
i
p ,
1 1 1 1 � �,I Pr � I I�,I I ,_
nl:lr_I E T __L
f� - EPIrIEo r_�, � L_sorE ,-rl ree'='I':.la , l�, �,rnl` f '� 'L
r+' � f
O m
f waoos nr
IF-L In - lu iv F rl=_u -TFC =''- / '.L
r�r,�n-1-II IICIIiI uilr- , LiI+ERIFIIF l' 1 IEi-
, / 't
n = r- I I1,_L c'II I I_ePi-�� r
ha322 h
al
TIL -1 ET -IIo- a2
av' a�
r'
_W
/
w
O �
O
/
cc 0 N-
O
LS tl � l
17
IE �, EI IFI
FFILA-FIFF E [I -
�P
n.l -- - - , - - - 8so
P CELI C I II I H I I I CLI I
?- 1,L i I I-II I I I I I I
a- - Fl
Q\�
1' y
I
N73
'/3• 1 % -
O �PE51al I-.T_�" -
i
o•- C7
,
W
d
— u`
a _ � 0
m _-
_ TI_I'I LC1 I _
I
/ _ _ _ _ ".F.LC
w„ s _ _ NOT TO ��
_ — TI_ _ III TL _ _
_ x
x 4'" .. / — _ — 'I II IIIfil � c„ —
f T ❑ T c
`� O� / FSE E _II I ', '5-1111 1 r' =11 F,I tIr - i r F_ sR rr _ m ro ea rr
_ `✓ - �/ 'O,, dh� / -FEI �_ CLI- F i I I I
CC {��{
1 `IriU - o
c n
[� i" •,���� J i cr
F. r
1101 IE
.� W ! �"r?•� ___ - ,�� �'-4�.`-w '� �' n; �' �" � "�o� / � I� 1 . 011 � I;a
rO
NC l�LITHII
`�"_ O � 3®�; nit r•a � '-AC - ��Y � � rE' �R .. � -6' �� �er._..rv'
ors r
R
9N o /30pji, PI0u r1 Tl
111AL �el
/o A" r FFS ,G ';. / / _ - _ r„ 1�1701 I H CLE e F14L •I� �srso
^ '[ -
N r �° u " - 9q! "i � f�<c 0 ZS_ / "bb��b2� r on 1 1 H
' p W u a o �Y"`-ts.,�„ S� 6 � - - ,eoun,11..r a ✓ "- .h
Fo a 2 2
�i9 o545°01'00"
z 20.78'-
Q � si ° $ /
�� n ° ° =rx_I or SFS, �,.rj r�;�. I•,
o• w 1 / b !
ot_es
■ MONUMENT FOUND � `\ �f".IIN�i 4
A STAKE FOUND _ °,� ""• '•.
O PIPE FOUND
AREA = 5-45,603 5F OR 1253 ACRES
i
PARCEL IS LOCATED IN ZONING OI5TRIGT R-8O ,_ _ _ •_ � "_
OFAPNIC SCALE I"=6o' T C.T g7
� E1�LdE
R LAND SURVEYOR
JOHN
0 50 120 160 6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S. LIC. N0. 50202
RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901
369-8288 Fax 369-8287 REF-\\Hp server\d\PROS\02-214D.pro
Young & Young, Land Surveyors _s;
400 0stroa,der Avcwv.e, Riverhead, Neel York 11901 1i�,
631- 727-2303 En"
AtdED W. YAr,.g, P.E. & L.S. (1908-1994)
Hn ward W Young, Land Surveyor f. .
LOCATION MAP Thomas C. Wofper4 ProJessi.onat Engvreeer
SCALE 1" = 600' l
1
AT
IF
4 / it.a
7 / %j/�/:///•%i„ ries UAEEF / 3
\) F — FEES CAVE aWi OFsa
. Vie, AFAR
H �o i
E
RIEEs oew, 14, vl' �1/ ��0 ��p�
SITE DATA A.
� /" ra/ % Jessn TOTAL AREA = 12.5253 ACRES -
/ / j /
�� IF � � • TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 3
y./ y' Y ryq,°A h`O • ZONING USE DISTRICT = R-80
�/004>1 • DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS CLUSTER
,a / l DEVELOPMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE RR (RESORT
®R/
/� RESIDENTIAL) ZONING USE DISTRICT EXCEPT THAT THE MINIMUM
�l� f MM s FRONT YARD SHALL BE 25 FEET a
vc b �r
� m
�j//�I " WH • THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED IN FIRM ZONE AE BASE ELEVATION 8
19 AS INDICATED ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL NUMBER
360813 0159 G LAST DATED MAY 4, 1998.
VERTICAL DATUM = N.G V DATUM (M.S L. 1929)
iql t�i sfis 3
F Mfi o
,. ; � 9 ION
ERTIFICAT
� � SURVEYOR'S C "
f E "� �� w ya° • y.„s
o / THIS MAP WAS PREPARED UTILIZING SURVEYS COMPLETED BY
,r
/ US IN 1999. CONTOURS AND CERTAIN TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA ARE ng�e
�/ '°�$ � FROM 5 EASTERN TOWN MAPS PREPARED FOR THE COUNTY OF Qpm
SUFFOLK
N J
G 9F 0Q�s
3
l
I
S /
cp,S HOWARD W. YOUNG, N7.5. L.S. N0. 45893 �iC� 45893 J�,Q a
j/� g' :�° TEST HOLE USED goP %
•_'” � -/ -.-f ,, �^�rzg re, �,> ��#il4;e ,�� , " e�-Oc �AN9
r wn a �. �i
Lott 'fi SA rs`S, TH#1 OWNER
(e °�
°° A_ �
se r_ r
eaowN EonM JOHN P. MILAZZO & ROSE L. MILAZZO C
°^,
`Q oaovm 137 KINGS ROAD o.ox
LOAMY NANU HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 -.U6
IN, 30/ /i ,J`JM 30
ES t'
f'
EA
Y FINE Nom
T P V r®
MEDIUM SAND 28
70' E�gw
kRgo .:` Dhow MINOR SUBDIVISION PREPARED FOR .�
0 6
O i' i t�4 54 0i�n"W xJ�� 'ry 5� SANDY CLAY �W8
ST3
e5 JOHN P. MILAllO & ROSE L. MILAllO
or .I WAtER IN GBaa
N�J92 , ca a
QF-u. EfoF°ti Y 2Se fiheC', �� SANDY
CL
ff�� SANDY cLnv
Angel, M
s,llmoWATER IN At Greenport, Town of Southold
( ED
formerly Po )
5
Q�QF`' PALE ROOWN Suffolk County, New York
'MEDIUM SAND
SIR - ,7v
County Tax Map 1.,t—L 1000 s-t— 53 01-F Ol wr 9
F CLUSTER SKETCH PLAN
INSPECTION STAKEOUT DRAWING
FEB. 4, 2002
I; I ' OCT. 9, 2001
AUG 16, 2001 a�€3
'I JUNE 22, 2001
MAR 18 2002
MAY 4, 2001
l- MAP PREPARED APR 9, 2001 a,.e
q k'
SCALE Y' = 100'
-�,,JU+LG¢tY6C� �V.YpV.(6 JOB N0. 1999-0161 ISD Ns�
' DWG. 990181_inspection_eo
'� 3u,'IdaJ4'In11�d3"Nl;All
= MONNYIN, so ■ pmrvuMEM ISISI STAKE SET ♦= sinrE FOUND 0- INmECnoN STAKE PREVIOUSP SET OR PPOPUSEU ,n BE $FT - - —
WETLAND LOCATION MAP
PREPARED FOR
JOHN P. MILAZZO & ROSE L, MILAZZO
/ �; �_ E
SITUATE: GREENPORT rL
TOWN: SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK -
5UFFL-�L� COUNTY TAX # _ Q•\��� `fib^ �R?off '
1000-53
SURVEI"ED %1 Ob-2005 /P�Q �.�-�` I =�F
- _ 11,4F 396 'ti
cl
C� ?
r�
�X,
1
_27
—.,errF�11�, L-LI 1i rF -' -,r � LH11,III11ILIII -� J
�f >, 0 FP T � 111 ;11 IIIL _�L 11111 . Lr11-ILL LI
m
4.
JA --— if c 11\A
------ r v°v322
a '
T1r--I 11FFI -11r,
S- A�\2 h2
\o: h°bat
C)
- O
6.
I
1 m
8so
I I
,.o
IF
� o b
IV-73.
/30p r -11. 1 TEF
1LTL=1.i
o\
° 1h
N - _ _ -_
I
3 /
-
/pfi o
A' ' m
545'01'0
- FF�00
+k-i � ��t �
Nse 6. iF
S
0 49
o'
a,
Prvtes
■ MONUMENT FOUND
r�
- STAKE FOUND
- - 7
PIPE FOUND
AREA = 545,0o2 SF OR 12 53 ACRE5
PARCEL IS LOCATED IN ZONING DISTRICT R-80
e
,GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=A0'
JOHN C. ]EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR
0 60 120 160
6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S. LIC. N0. 50202
RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901
369-8288 Fax 369-8287 REF—\\Hp server\d\PROS\02-214WETONLY.pro