Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-22.-3-15.1
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonatd Kenneth L Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-I 938 January '10, '1995 Charles Cuddy, Esq. P,O. Box 1547 Rivei"head, NY 11901 Re: Proposed clustered major subdivision for Cove Beacia Estates SCTM# '1000-22-3-15,1 & 18,3 Dear Mr. Cuddy: The following took place ara meeting ofthe Southold Town pladning Board on Monday, January 9,1995: WHEREAS. Raoul ~r~teveen is the owner of the property known amd designated as SCTM# 1000-22-3-15.1 & 18.3 located on the north side of Main Road; 1776 feet east of Stars Road in East Marion; and WHEREAS. this proposed clustered major subdivision, Lo be known as Cove Beach Estates, is for ~4 lots on 98.2673 acres; and WHEREAS. the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the state Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 6'17, adopted a Findings Statement on July '10, '1989 for the proposed subdivision; and ' WHEREAS, the final maps are in accordance with the mitigation ~easures contained in the Findings Statement; and Page 2 Proposed major subdivision for Cove Beach Estates January 10, 1995 WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold. New York. on December 12, 1994; and WHEE~EAS, the Planning Board has reviewed the concerns raised at the December 12, 1994 public hearing and has decided that in order to minimize the traffic impacts of the pending developments on State Route 25, that a single curb cut must be designed and a road tap muSt be provided to allow access to the adjacent property to the east; and ~W~l~R ,.F_~, a. II the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town ~oumol(] will be met upon fulfillment of the conditions of al~Proval; be iL therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant condi~onal final approval on the subdivision maps dated June 2:5, 1994, and the road and drainage plans dated September 15, 1990. All conditions must be met . within six (6) months of the date of this resolution, I. A road tap must be provided to allow for access of the adjacent properties to the east to Main Road. The road tap must t~e located approximately six hundred (600) feet from the intersectiol~ of the proposed road (Cove Beach Drive) and Main Road (State Rloute 25). 2. Six (6) final subdivision maps and two (2) mylar maps mu~t be submitted. Ail maps must contain the following: ' A. A valid stamp of approval from the Health Department. B. A notation that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions was filed pertaining to the subdivision. The notation must include the Iiber and page number ~ the filed document. C. The firewell locations. D. The road tap as required in condition number 1. The Declaration of coVenants and Restrictions required bYi the Planning Board must be recorded. A copy of the recorde~l document must be submitted. The Homeowners Association must be consistent with all I~lanning Board conditions and must be recorded for the roads, drainage areas, park and playground area and open space areas. A copy o the recorded document must be submitted. Page 5 Proposed major subdivision for Cove Beacl~ Estates January 10, 1995 The Performance Guarantee in the amount of $815,525.00, must be submitted in a form acceptable Lo the Town Board· The administration fee in the amount of $48,9:51.00, must be paid. jrThe outstanding information for the lot line change for Otto Uh · and Harold Reese, Sr. must be submitted, and the appllcat on' must be completed. ~ Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Joseph Gazza IN THIS LOT LiNE CHANGE BETWEEN IS LOCATED ON · SCTM# 1000- LOT LINE CHANGE Complete application received Application reviewed at work session Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised subm~sston recetved Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determmat,on Sent to County Planning Commission ~Review of SCPC report Dr~t Covenants and Restrictions received Drift Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants ,nO Restrictions received Final Public Hearing Approval of Lot Line -with conditions Endorsement of Lot Line AND · 416 2 4 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Phone 516-765-1801 __ / Southold, New York 11971 Date~'~/~ 19 ~_ t g~[ith T. Terry, Tox~l/¢ lerk u < YOUNG & YOUNG PLANNING, ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RI~RHEAD, NEW YORK ! 1901 Telephone [$16-727-2303 Facsimile §16-727-Of44 March 18, 1993 Melissa Spiro, Planner Town of Southold Planning Department Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Lot Line Change Cove Beach Estates at East Marion, T/O Southold, New York Dear Ms. Spiro: Enclosed is the completed Environmental Assessment Form, for your review of the above referenced application. If you have any questions regarding this applicatioh, please advise. TCW/sjt Encl. cc: Mr. Harold Reese, Jr. + Encl. Ben Kinzler, Esq. + Encl. Very truly yoursl, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. ALDEN W. YOU NG HOWARD W. YOUNG THOMAS C. WOLPERT KENNETH F. ABRUZZO Professional Engineer Land Surveyor Professional Engineer Land Surveyor & Land Sum~eyor 4-16-~ (.2/87)-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full I~AF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a proiect or action may be significant The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full £AF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site, By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 F Part 2: ocuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered sma I to moderate or wl~ether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Act!ons Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part I i_! Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF [Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and (~ny other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it ~s reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ' [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact[s) and, therefore, i~ one which will not have a Significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration W~ill be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there wilt not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 21 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may havea significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Lot Line Change Between Land of Harold Reese, Sr. et al and Land ofiOtto Uhl, Jr. Name of Action et al - Cove Beach Estates Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date " PAR~--IPROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whethe~ the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Piovide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3, It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACT~ON Lot Line Change Between ~Land of Harold Reese, Sr. et al and. Land of Otto Uhl, Jr. et al - Cove Beach Estates LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, MuniclpaUty and County) North Side of Main Road 1,776 feet east of Stars Road, East Marionl, Suffolk COunty, NY NAME OF~PONSOR BU~INESS TELEPHONE Young & Young (.51~I 727-2303 ADDRESS 400 Ostrander Avenue CITY/PO Riverhead, STATE Z P CODE NY I11g°l BU!INESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER (11 dllte~e~t) Harold Reese, Sr. et al ADDRESS 855 Sunrise Hwy. Otto Uhl, Jr. et al c/o Frank Russel, Sr. 9 Derby Road CiTY/PO STATE ZIPCODE Lynbrook, NY 11563 Port Washington, NY 11050 DESCRIPTION OFACTION The application consists of the conveyance of a 10,093 S.F. parcelifrom Harold Reese, Sr. et al to Otto Uhl, Jr. et al and the conveyance'6f a 5,258 S.F. parcel from Otto Uhl, Jr. et at to Harold Reese, Sr. et al. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and un;developed areas. 1. Present land use: [0rban [Industrial []Forest I-1Agriculture 2. Total acreage of project area: 0.3524 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 Forested 0. 3524 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 or ECL) 0 acres Water Surface Area 0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 Other (indicate type) 0 acres r-ICommercial CIOther [ Residentia (suburban) IX]Rural (non-farm) AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres 0. 3524 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Plymouth loamy sand, 3 to 8~ slopes a. Soil drainage: []WeU drained 100 % of site f-IModerately well drained [ % of site []Poorly drained % of site b..If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classific.ation System? N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [~Yes ~]No a. What is depth to bedrock? [9/A (in feet) .5. Approximate percentage of proposed projec with slopes: [~0-10% iO0 1~10-15% % E15% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic P aces? EYes ~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? E-Iyes ~]No 8. What is the depth of the water table? ,30' (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [Yes [No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? []Yes 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? r"lYes ~]No' According to ¥ounc~ & ¥ot~ng Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [Yes [No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [l-lYes []No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community;~ F'lYes [No ' 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) I 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? l-lYes I-INo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? i-lYes []No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []Yes ENo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 2.04? E]Yes []No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designatedi pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 []Yes I~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [Yes ~]No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of proiect (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 98.26'73 b. Project acreage to be developed: ~I/A acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped t~/.~ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: t~/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ' [~/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing [~/,~ ; proposed _ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour N/A (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i D mensions (in feet) of largest proppsed structure ~/-~- height; _ width; ; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? bl/A ft. acres. + 12.294]. AcL'es o~rned by acres ultimately.Ofct-o Ol't[~ ,3'z'. e 2. ~tow much natural material (i.e., rock th, etc.) will be removed from the site?I 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? []Yes [No []N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-lYes rqNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-lYes []No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 . acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? E]Yes []No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: N/A ' a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lyes F3No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction gl/A 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? I-lYes N/A 0 tons/cubic yards months, (including demolition). y~ar, (including demolition). year, f-INo ; after project is completd I-lyes K]No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? il-lYes ~]No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount , b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged ~ 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? il-lYes [~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? I-Iy~s Explain I~No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? i-lYes I~No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? r-lyes E3No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an exis-ting solid waste facility be used? r~Yes I-3No c. If yes, give name ; location ~ d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain I-lyes r-lNo 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I-lyes r-lyes iX]No tons/month. years. (~o 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I-lYes I~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? r"iyes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? f-lYes [~No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? il-lYes r~No If Yes, explain ~]No - 25. ,Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board ~lYes I-]No C-ii~, Town, L'~.',:~. Planning Board [Yes [3No City, Town Zoning Board [:]Yes I-INo City, County Hea!th Department [:]Yes [:]No Other Local Agencies [3Yes I'-lNo Other Regional Agencies I-lYes I-INo State Agencies I-]Yes CINo Federal Agencies I-lYes [3No Submittal Type Date Lot Line Change 3/91 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision;' [[]Yes ENo If Yes, indicate decision required: I-lzoning amendment Iqzoning variance l-]special use permit Esubdivisionl I-Isite plan [-Inew/revision of master plan [:]resource management plan [~other Lot Li~e Chancre 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the s te? Residential now Density A 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by theipresent zoningS' N/A . 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by theiproposed zoning?;' N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use pians? IXIYes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~/~ mile radius oi proposed action;' Residential/Aaricultura~ - Residential Low Density A 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoinin~surrounding land uses within a '/~ rPile? IX]Yes ENo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed;' N/A~ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? N/A 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I-lyes [No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreAtion, education, police, fire protection};' [:]Yes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? C1Yes I~lNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels;' r-lYes []No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [:]Yes ENo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are for may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which yo~ propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ~f'~J~Sponsor Name Thomas C. Wolpert, Dat~ Signature ~'/~ ~. /.-'~~'~. Title Professional Engin,~er If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Part 2--PR(~CT iMPACTS AND THEIR MA(~TUDE Responsibility o1' Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large ~mpact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that itbe looked at further. · · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showin8 types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would tri§ger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question· · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each ques!ion. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact· b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers· c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to inc~icate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If !mpact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the iproject to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible· This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. WiN the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? E3NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 1OO foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for m~nin§ purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction m a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2 Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? ( e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ONo I-'lYES · Specific land forms: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes r'-INo [] [] I--lYes ONo [] [] []Yes F~No [] [] []Yes FINo [] [] []Yes r-]No [] ' [] []Yes []No [] [] I-lYes []No [] ' [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) r~NO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ; Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? C]NO I-lyE S Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? CINO F'IyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system, · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ~ · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action wdl likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or stoiage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff?, I-INO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] I--lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I-'lYes []No [] [] r-lyes []No [] [] []Yes I-INo [] [] []Yes []No [] I[] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I--lyes []No [] [] I--lYes []No [] [] []Yes r-INo [] [] I-"lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] ,i[] · []Yes []No [] I[] []Yes []No [] [] r-lyes []No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Ac~tion is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · ' Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? [3NO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON' PLAN'TS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species~ f-INO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ' Reduction of one or more species listed on the New Yo.rk or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, or,her than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? r~No f-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? E3NO I-lYES Examples that wduld apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes crop and. hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact Impact Project Change [] [] I-lyes []No [] [] r-lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] r~Yes [-INo [] [] I--lyes r-lNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [-']Yes []No [] [] []Yes [-INo [] ir-I []Yes []No [] [] r-lyes [-INo [] I~ [:]Yes I-qNo [] [-) []Yes i--INo [] I-'] []Yes [-INo [] r~ r-]Yes []No [] ~] i-lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more · than 2.5 acres of agricultural [and. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~ I-INO I-lYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance~ ~INO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 F-1NO r-lYES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community, · Other impacts: · I ~ 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Ch'ange [] [] []Yes []No [] [] i--Wes I--INo [] [] []Yes I'-INo l-]' [] r-ives i-I~o [] [] i'~¥es I-I~o [] [] ~Yes ~o [] [] · ~¥es []~o [] [] []Yes [] [] []Yes ~o [] [] [~Yes [] [] []Yes ~o ~ ~ ~ ~Yes ~0 ~ ~ ~Ves ~o IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION '~4 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? [~NO C1YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people andjor goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impa~ts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? []NO I-lYE S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? CINO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will.produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levets for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? [NO r~YES [xamples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result Jn the excavation or other disturbance within'2,0O0 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: 10 I ~' 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] r-lYes []No [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] []Yes J-]No [] [] r-lyes J'-J NO [] [] r-]yes []No [] [] []Yes I'-J No [] [] ~ []Yes rqNo [] [] I--lYes [] [] rqYes []No [] E] ~¥es I-1No [] [] I-lyes r-INo [] J~ gYes r-lNo [] r-I r-lYes E]No [] E] []Yes E]N0 [] [~ rqYes rqNo iMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 1§. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ~INO [YES Fxamples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the proiect is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year .~s a result of this proje~. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate e×isting facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services le.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I-lYes [-INo [] [] [-]Yes I'-lNo [] ' ' I'-I I-lyes [-INo [] [] I--lYes F'-INo [] [] r-lyes I'-I~o [] [] F'lyes IZ]No [] [] I-lYes I-1No [] [] ~Yes I-1No [] [] r-lyes I--iNo 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy relab'~d to potential adverse environmental impacts? []NO 3YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large~mpact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF iMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurrin§ · The duration of the impact · Its irrevers bility, incfuding permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact (Continue on attachments) 11 AGREEMENT made May 8, 1992, between Harold Reese, Sr., Harold Reese, Jr. and Frederick Reese, all of 855 iSunrise Highway, Lynbrook, New York (hereinafter collectively referred to as "PARTY OF THE FIRST PART"), and Otto Uhl, Jr., Russell U. Broach, George F. Russel, Harold E. Russel and Frank R. Russel, sr., all of 9 Derby Road, Port Washington, New York 11050 (hereinafter collectively referred to as "PARTY OF THE SECOND PART"). WHEREAS, the PARTY OF THE FIRST PART is the Owner in fee of a certain parcel of Real Property situated at Eas~ Marion, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, consisting ~of approximately 98.1563 acres and hereinafter referred to as PREMISES "A," and set forth on a certain map entitled "Map of Lot-Line Change between Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Land of Otto Uhl, Jr. et al Prepared for Cove Beach Eastates at East Marion, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, N.Y." which map was dated February 1, 199~ and was revised on February 28, 1992 and which map is annexed hereto as Exhibit "1," and WHEREAS, the PARTY OF THE SECOND PART is the owner in fee of that property situated in East Marion, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, consisting of approximately 1~.4051 acres and hereinafter referred to as PREMISES "B," and asl set forth on a certain map attached hereto as Exhibit "1," and WHEREAS, the PARTY OF THE FIRST PART desireslto constuct a roadway so as to provide ingress and egress across Premises "A," which roadway will end in a cul-de-sac, a portion of which cul-de- sac shall be upon a portion of Premises "B," and WHEREAS, the PARTY OF THE SECOND PART is des~irous of granting to the PARTY OF THE FIRST PART an Easement in land to a certain portion of Premises "B," which portion of Premxses "B" is more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the dlvl$1on line between land now or formerly Otto Uhl, Jr. et al and land now or formerly Harold Reese, Sr., et al., said point being situate the following three (3) courses! and distances as measured along the division line ' between land now or formerly Otto Uhl, Jr. et al and land now or formerly Harold Reese, Sr. et al from the northeasterly corner of land now or formerly Constance J. Terr~: (1) North 61 deg. 22 min. 14 sec. ~ast 97.62 feet, (2) North 24 deg. 21 min. 26 sec. West 833.61 feet, (3) North 45 deg. 03 min. 26 sec. West 62.80; RUNNING thence from said point of beginning along the division line between land now or f~rmerly Otto Uhl, Jr. et al and land now or formerly Ha~91d Reese, Sr. et al the following two (2) courses and distances: (1) South 45 deg. 03 min. 26 sec. East 62.80 feet, (2) South 24 deg. 21 min. 26 sec.'East 109.09 feet a point; RUNNING thence through land now Or formerly Otto Uhl, Jr. et al the following two I(2) courses and distances: (1) northwesterly on a curve to the left having a radius of 60.00 feet a distance of 68.46 feet, (2) northerly on a curve to thei right havin~ ~ ~adius of .60.00 feet a distance of 15~.42~ feet to ~h~ aivision line between land now or formerly Otto Uhl, Jr. et al and land now or formerly Harold ~eese, Sr. et al and the point of place of BEGINNING. (hereinafter referred to as "Section 1,,1 . NOW, therefore, in consideration of the mutual agreements and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto convenant and agree for themselves, and for their heirs, successors and assigns, as follows: 1. The PARTY OF THE SECOND PART shall not build or maintain, or permit to be built or maintained, any structure on Section 1 other than the roadway to be constructed pursuant ~o this AGREEMENT. 2. The PARTY OF THE FIRST PART shall have ~he right to use, free of charge, Section pedestrian travel thereon, THE SECOND PART. 3. The PARTY OF THE 1 for the purpose vehicular and such use to be common with the PARTY OF SECOND PART shall have, for the purpose of ingress and egress to Premises "B," the right ~o use and a right of way over a certain roadway to be constructed across Premises "A" beginning at Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) and ending at Section 1. 4. The PARTY OF THE FIRST PART shall have the right to construct a roadway and structures related theret6 on the premises designated as Section 1, and shall thereafter maintain and keep same in good condition and repair. 5. This AGREEMENT shall continue in perpetuity or until sooner terminated by written agreement of the parties, andlwith the written consent of the Town of Southold. 6. This AGREEMENT is subject to the final approval by the Town of Southold and the County of Suffolk of a ~ertain proposed subdivision application of Premises "A" by the PARTy OF THE FIRST PART. In the event that such application is not granted final approval or is withdrawn for any reason, then, and in that event, this AGREEMENT shall be null and void and of no further force and effect. 7. The Easements hereby granted, the restrictions hereby imposed, and the agreements herein contained, shall be easements, restrictions and convenants running with the land and shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns, including, but without limitation, all subsequent owners of Premises "A" and of Premises "B" and all persons claiming under them. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed, this AGREEMENT. STATE OF /c~/~/$ , COUNTY OF ~j~O On the ~th day of May, 1992, before me personally came ~%~%~\ ~. ~ro~d~ to me known to be the individual ~described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. OFFICIAL NOTAP. Y SEAL ~,~ } HF. LEN RENDA On the 8th day of May, 1992, before me personallyi came /~ 7~ to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledge~ that he executed the same. STA~E OF ~pk ~ , COUNTY OF ~J ~ ~ ~ ~ On the 8th day of May, 1992, before me personally~ came ~fF~ to me. known to be the individual described executed the fo~ instrument, and acknowledge~that the same. 4~4b~lSl On the 8th day of May, 1992, ,per,on,iix ~ame ~ q~ to me known to ; ~ ' De ~ne znQsvzduai descrzbed 'in and who executed the foregoing instrumen~ and acknowledged that he executed the same. DEBORAH B. ~ Nota~ Public, Stats o( New York / ~the 8th day of May, 1992, before me .p~rsonally ~c~me ~ '~~o me. known to be the indlvldual des~rzbed ~c~.t~foregolng instrument, and acknowledged~ that he exec~t~ DEBORAH B. KAHN NotaW Public, State of New York No. 24-4750499 Qualif ed in Kings County ,(~ Commission Expires Apr 30, 19/-~P ~~ 9 ~~e known to me the mnalvldual.descrmbed in-a~d who -- executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged tha~executed the same. STATE OF , COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992 before me . , personal to me known to be the individual described executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. STATE OF , COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992, before me personally came to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. STATE OF , COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992, personally came to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. STATE OF , COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992, before me personally came ~ to me. known to be the individual described in and who executed the zoregolng instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT Cove Branch Estates To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: Otto Uhl, Jr. et al. Lot-Line Change The undersigned applicant hereby applies for 0l~0~kfSfJil~ approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the laud under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) n/a 2. The name of the subdivision is to be .................................................... The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as folloxvs: ' H.R. Reese, Sr., H.R. Reese, Jr., Frederck Reese Liber ...1D.26.4 .............. Page ..... 53 .............. On Mar. cb..5.,.. 19t~.'/ ..... ; Otto Uhl, Jr. et al. Liber ...6. ~.~1~ ................ Page .... 2.6.4. .............. On ....................... ; Libe Page ' On Liber Page On Liber ........................ Page ...................... On as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ....................................... or as distributee ......................... 5. The area of the land is . 110.5614 acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the {late hereof have been paid eXCept ............ 7. The land is encumbered by .................................. mortgage (s) as follows: ............................ (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page .................. {n original amonnt of $ .............. unpaid amount $ ..................... held by ...................... address (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... .............. address ......... , . ~ '':~ % ...................... .. '~ · ~. ~','.~'... ~ .~ ....... 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amouut of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ...................... address ......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ...... ! ................. 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts R-80 I 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. No part of the land lies under water wheth er t~de water, stream, pond ~vat or otherwise, ex- cept .................................................................. [ ................. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. The land (cl~x) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply Distr :t. blame of Dis- trict, if xvlthin a District, is ............................................. \Vater mains will be laid by . ..N/..A ..................................... and (a) (no) charge xvill be made for installing said mains. Electric lines and standards tvill be installed by . .l~I/~, ................................... lines. · ................... attd (a) (no) cbarge will be made for installing said Gas maius will be installed by l~l,h .................................................... and (a) (no) charge xvill be made for installiug said mains. If streets sho~vn on the plat are claimed by tile applicant to be existing pi ic streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "13" hereto, to show me. If streets sholvn oll the plat are claimed by tbe applicant to be existing p )Ifc streets in the Town of Southold Highxvay system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show sa~ ne. There are no existing buildings or structnres on the land xvhicI~ are not ,cared and shown on the plat. \Vbere the plat sbows proposed streets which are extensions of streets n adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of ~e streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions xvith the proposed streets. In the course of these proceedings, the al~plicant will offer proof of title reqnired by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. Snbmit a copy of proposed deed for lots showi: g all restrictions, covel xnts, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading anti required public improvements will be $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto anoexed anti requests thatlthe matt rity of the Performance Bond be fixed at .............. years. The Performance Bond[ will be written by a lice~n, sed-surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F" .... ............................... sv,w~ or ~Ew VOR~. COUNty or ~ ~ ~ ~' On thc .................. day of .............................. 19 ....... before ............................................ to me known to be tlie individnal de executed the foregoing' instrument, anti acknowledged that ............ executed Notary Public ST.\TF. OF NEXV YORK. COUNTY OF ................ ............ ~e personally came mribed in and who On the ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ....... before me .......................... to me known, who beiing by me pose and say that ............ resides at No. ................................ that .......................... is the .......... thc corporation described in and which execoted the foregoing' instrument; that ........... knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed hv orr er of the board of directors ' said corporation. :md that ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order. )ersonally came uly sworn did de- STATE OF FZ O~/p/~ , COUNTY OF On the' ~tth day of May, 1992, before .me .per. ~-~%k_V 6~%C~to me. known to be the executed the foreqo~_ n~_ ~ n~,,~,~ ~a ~kn~~ - the same. [ OF~C~L N~ S~ [' I COMMIE~BION NO. CC16~ [ '~'~ u~' f ' , COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992, before me personally ~/f.~£~ to me. known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknOwledgedthat he executed the same. · ~]~_cLia and who that he executed came /~ ~ £. On the 8th day of May, 1992, before me pe~sonall, ~'~. to me known to be the individual des executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledge( the same. ~ ~J~u~ sr~r! ~ ~ ~ ~ .--, ~ 43~;81 On the 8th day of May, 1992, personally came ~L~ to me known to be the individual des executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same. DEBORAH B. KAHN Nota~ Public, State of New York No. 24-4750499 ) (~.~' ~ Qualified in Kings County (~ ~ommission- Expires April 30, 194~ ' STATe oF/v /or COUNTY /Va O > the 8th.day of May, 1992, before.me personally ~/..~. to me. known to be the lndividual des. executed)t~ forego/ng ~nstrument, and acknowledged the same. DEBORAH B. KAHN NOlaW Public, State of New York NO. 24'4750499 Qualified in IOn~ County Comm,ss~on Expires ~oHI ~0, came ~/~'~ ~. :ribed in and who .that he executed :rxDed ~n and ~ho that he executed =ribed in and who that he executed ~~ 'r~~,'to me known to be the individua~des¢~rlbed in and who' executed the foregoing instrument, and ackno~wledged thatch executed the same. </~~/~~ e/ STATE OF COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992, before me pe~onally came . to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the zoregoing Instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. STATE OF , COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992, before me personally to me known to be the individual des¢ executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same. STATE OF , COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992, personally came to me known to be the individual desc executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same. STATE OF , COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992, before.me.p~rsonally to me known to be the Individual des¢ executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same. marne ribed in and who that he executed ~ibed in and who that he executed :ame fibed in and who that he executed APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL LAT %/~'ove Branch Estates To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: ~-~)tto Uhl, J]'. et al. Lot -Lio.~ Change The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (l~0~rgk~r,.~l~j0 approval accordance xvith Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be n/a 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto anne ced. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Snffolk Count~ Clerk's office as folloxvs: H.R. Reese, Sr., H.R. Reese, Jr., Frederck Re.=se Liber ...10.26.4 .............. Page ..... ~3 .............. Ou Mar. ch .5.,..198.~.. - Otto Uhl, Jr. et al. '"' Liber ...~.4~ ................ Page . ~.6~4. .......... On ..... Liber Page ' Liber ...................... Page .... 0 Liber .................. Page On . as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ..................... or as distributee ............... 5. The area of the land is 110.5614 .................. acres. 6. All taxes xvbich are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid ex pt ............ 7.The land is encumbered by .. mortgage (s) as follows: ................... (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page .................. a original amount of $ .............. unpaid amount $ ..................... held by ..................... address (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page ....................... original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by .................. subdivision plat in he Southold Town ~pplicant is not the is interest in said (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ....................... ...................... address ......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ..................... 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts . R-BO 10. No part of tile land lies under water Ivhether t!de water, stream, cept ............................................................... 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public ilnprovements. 12. Tile land (~k~ (dues not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply Distl trict, if within a District, is ........................................... 13. Water mains will be laid by . ..bl/.A ................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. or otherwise, ex- Name of Dis- Electric lines aud standards will be installed by ..lg/~, ............... lines. · ............. and (a) (no) charge Will be mad for installing said Gas mains will be installed by .lq,/A .................................. and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. If streets sho~vn ou the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existiug Suffolk County Highway system, aunex Schedule "B" hereto, to shov If streets shoxvn on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show There are no existing buildings or structures on the land whicli are not on the plat. \Vhere the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets division maps heretofore filed, there are uo reserve strips at the end of existiug' maps at their conjnuctions with the proposed streets. Itl the course of these proceedings, the applicant will ,fret prouf of title required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. Snbmit a copy of proposed deed for lots sbowlng all restrictions, cuvenmts, etc. Annex Schedule "D". ' streets in the )lic streets in tile ne. aud shown adjoining sub- streets on said 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto anuexed anti requests that ihe matority of the Performance Bond be fixed at .............. years. The Performance Bomt will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". lq/ ...... /. .... , ................................. DA . 1 ~.. ( (~,/~, ~./~ ~/'~_ (Name ST..\TI.~ OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ..... .~..~.': ... '; ........... i .... ss: (')n the .................. day of .............................. 19 ....... before n ............................................ to me known to be the i~dlvidual de executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged tbat ............ executed Notary Public ST.\TF. OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF ............................ ss: On tile ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ...... , before m~ .......................... to me known, who being by me l,~,se and say that ............ resides at No. ................................ that .......................... the c,rporation described in and which executed tile foregolug instrument; that . the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors and that ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order. personally came ribed in and who personally came uly sworn did de- is the .......... .......... kno~vs said corporation. Notary Public , COUNTY OF ~S%~.~o~k to me known to be the individual.de~Icrlbed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledg~ that he executed the same. I O~L N~y S~ i IN HELEN ~A I On ~he 8~h da~ ot ~ay, ~992, betore me .petaonal~h oam~ ~~. ~~ ~o me ~nown ~o be ~he tndxvtdual described in and who exeouged ~he foregoing insgru~eng, and ao~ow~edge ghag he executed ~he ~e. On the 8th day of May, 1992, before .me .personall~ came ~a to me known to be the xndzvi~ual de~ cribed in and who executed the foregoing inst~ment, and acknowledge, that he executed the same. STATE OF,A./~,cc) yOr/~. , COUNTY On the 8th day of May, 1992, personally, came OK 0 .U~/~/-. to me known to be the individual des=rlbed ~n and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledge( that he executed the same. DEBORAH S. KAHN No. 24~.?r~4~ _ Oua.f din Kite. Cou.W OR t;ommiseion Expiree April ~0, 1 ~ STATE O~A/¢-~.)?O,~ , COUNTY 0~,A/~O.4 on the 8th day of ~a¥, lg92, before me ~ersonall~ came.~.~,~.~ execu~e~'~he ffo~egoing instrument, an~ ac~n~u~gec ~b~ be exeouCe~ the same. O On ~he~. ~.-qU~~2, before me personall ~~~oJ~o be the lndlvidual,des, executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledge( the same. STATE OF , COUNTY OF ~ On the 8th day of May, 1992, before me persona~ to me known to be the individual des( executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same. STATE OF , COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992, before me personally to me known to be the individual des¢ executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same. STATE OF , COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992, personally came to me known to be the individual desc executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the same. STATE OF , COUNTY OF On the 8th day of May, 1992, before me personally _ to me. known to be the individual des¢ executed the zoregolng instrument, and acknowledged the same. .ribed in and who ' that~executed ca~e ~ribed in and who that he executed came ribed in and who that he executed ribed in and who that he executed :ame ~ibed in and Who that he executed December 1, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Lot Line Changes Cove Beac~ Estat~ East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 - 3 - 18.1 Gentlemen: The. following statements ar? offere~ for yo~r.c~n~ the review of the above-mentioned minor .su~lVlSl referral to the Suffolk County Planning CommisSion: (1) No grading, other than foundation exc residential building is proposed. No new roads are proposed and no chan in the grades of the existing roads. No new drainage structures or alterat structures are proposed. (2) (3) avation les wil ion of Yours t ~uly, Harold ~eese, s deration in ~n and its for a be made ~isting Dece~tber 1, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Lot Line Changes Cove Beac~ Estat~ East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 : ~ - 3 - 18.~ Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for yo~ the review of the above-mentioned minor su] referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commiss (1) No grading, other than foundation exc residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no chan in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alterat structures are proposed. zr consJ >divisi~ ion: avation ~es wil ion of s deration in ~n and its for a be made ~isting May 8, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Lot Line Changes Cove Beac~ Estat~ East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 22 - 3 - 18.1 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for yo the review of the above-mentioned minor su referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commis~ (1) (2) (3) ar cons: ion: No grading, other than foundation excavatio residential building is proposed. No new roads are proposed and no cha~ges in the grades of the existing roads, iV No new drainage structures or alteration of structures are proposed. Your s~ruly, ~'ranK R. Russe~ NNING BOARD ~S .deration in )n and its for a be made xisting Sr. May 8, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Gentlemen: Re: Lot Line Changes Cove Beac~ Estat~ East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 i 22 - 3 - 18.3 i 22 - 3 - 18.1 The following statements are offered for yo the review of the above-mentioned minor su referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commis~ (1) (2) (3) ~r cons~ )divis~ ion: No grading, other than foundation ex~ avatio residential building is proposed. No new roads are proposed and no cha~ges wi.' in the grades of the existing roads.! No new drainage structures or alteration of structures are proposed. Otto Uh~, Jr. .deration in )n and its for a be made xisting / i I May 8, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Changes Cove Beach Estat~ Lot Line East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 22 - 3 - 18.1 Gentlemen: The. following statements ar? offere~ for y~ur c~n~ the review of the above-mentioned, m~nor .sq~divls~ referral to the Suffolk County Planning CommisSion: (1) No grading, other than foundation exSavatio! residential building is proposed. (2) (3) No new roads are proposed and no chal in the grades of the existing roads. No new drainage structures or altera~ structures are proposed. ~ges wi] ion of Lderation in ~n and its for a be made existing Yours.<. t rul(, May 8, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Lot Line Changes Cove Be~ East Marion, N.Y. .1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 22 - 3. - 18.1 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for yol the review of the above-mentioned minor su] referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commiss (1) No grading, other than foundation exc residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no chan in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alterat structures are proposed. Estatl ,r.con~] ~dlvisl( lO~: avation res wil ion of ~uly, deration in ,n and its for a be made ~isting 54781 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 March 11, 1991 Gentlemen: Re: The following statements are offc in the revie~ of the aboveumentioned m referral '60 the Suffolk County Plannin (1) (2) No g~ading, residential othe~ %han foundation building is. proposed. No new roads"~re proposed and no the grades of. the existing roads. (3) No ne%~ drainage structures or alt( structures are proposed. Harol~ ,ot-Lin( ;ove Bet ~ast Ma] .000 - red fo~ inor su Commi~ 'hanges ration :Change · ch Estates 'ion, N.Y. 2 - 3 - 15.1 2 - 3 - 18.3 2 - 3 - 18.1 your consideration ~division and its' ;sion: ~ion for a will be made in of existing May 8, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Gentlemen: Re: Lot Line Changes Cove Beac East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 3 - 18.3 22 - 3 - 18.1 Esta' The. following statements are offered for yo~r.cgn~ the review of the above-mentioned minor su~dlvlsl referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commis ion: (1) No grading, other than foundation ex, residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no cha~ in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or altera structures are proposed. avatio ges wi ion of ' Russ( .deration )n and its for a be made xisting 14.16-4 12/87)~Text 12 I 617.21 Appendix C SEQR State Environmental Qua SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL A~ F~ For UNLISTED ACTiOI~JS Only PART I~PROJECT INFORMATION (To be complete- ' 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR Municipality Southold Suffolk Counl¥ 4. PBECISE LOCATION (Street ad~ress and road Intersections, pr0rninent landmarks, etc., or provi~ North side Main Road East Marion, N.Y. 1776 Ft. east of Stars Road 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: [] ModJfica tionlalterallon Lot-Line Change - Exchange of Land AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially Less Than acres Ultimately N/A 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLy WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND US~"~ ~] Yes [] NO Ii' NO, describe brielly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITy OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] Industrial [] Commercial Describe: Vacant - Proposed realty [] Agriculture [] Park/For~ subdivision 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING., NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes [] NO If yes, list agency(s) and permiUapprovals STRICTJONS st/Open spac~ [] Olher GENCY (FEDERAL. 11 . DOES ANy ASPECT OF THE ACT:ON HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] NO Ir yes, Jis! agency name and permitlapptoval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICA'~I [] Yes [] NO I CERTIFy THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE aES1 Applicanllsponsor name: ~---'~he act~n is in the Coastal Area, and you are asta Coa,~tal Assessment Form before proceedinq wi;l~ icy, comp ~te the OVER 1 PAR__.T II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be c ,AJ"~. C,3,~S AC~y~'-~' ....... Ompleted by Agency) .--~ , I ' []Yes [] No HOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 ~ C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be h Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quallly or quanlgy, noise levels, existing frei(lc patterns, potenbal Ior erosion, drainage or /Joe{ling problems? EXplain briefly: A commumty's ex~sbng plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of us ~ of land or otb C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely [o be induced by the proposed aclJon? C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-C57 ExpJain briefly. Explain b C?. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain brieby. ~.IS T~'ERE. OR IS THERE LIKELY TO SE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVI [] Yes [] NO If Yes, explain b~etly PART III--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether il (s subs(an Each ef(ect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); irreversibilily; (e) geographic scope; and (t) magnitude. I1' necessan/, add attachments or explanations contain su(ficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have b~ [] Check this box if you have id ' ' ~ enhhed one or more potentially large or Signii occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF andlor prepare a positive dec [] Check this box ii' you have determined, based on the nJqrmation and ar documentation, that (he proposed action W LL NOT result in any significa AND provide on attachmen s as necessary, the reasons supporting this deb )NMENTAL [ ~1, large, im ~ probat3i/il terence sup( identified ar laratJon. alysis abo~ ~t adverse rmination: borbood character? Explain briefly: les? Explagl briefly: rtant or otheR,'isa significant. )t occurring; (c) duration (dj or(lng materia s. Ensure that d adequately addressed. ~e impacts which MAY e and any support ng ~nvironmental impacts -- I Southold, N.Y. 1!971 (516) 765-193S QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COt YOUR TIONS AND of occupancy, Please complete, sign and return Board with your COm~le~ ~ . to the Off to any of ~ ~ ~, ~. Le~ appllcatioas form .... = ~°±±OWzng questions is y~es, p these on your guaranteed survey or s:bmit o' evidence~ 1. Are'there any wetland grasses on ~his pa~ (Attached is a list-o.f the wetland g]~asses by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your refe (Se~'DEIS prepared for Cove Beach Estat 2. Are there any other premises under your abutting this parcel? Other land of et al (part of minor subdivision) tto Uhl 3. Are there any building permits p nding o this parcel? 4. Are there any other applications ending ~[~[ ~z~ ~p~ty before any o~her · g Y.(Town , State, C©unty, Subdivision "Cove Beach ' , Estates 5. Is there any application pending ~efore any other agency with regard to a different project on this parcel? 6. Was this property the subject of ~ny pti. application to the Planning BOard? 7. Does this property have a vali~ certifica if yes please Submit a copy of s~ I ce~{if,~f~, the/ above Sta on y nl pard in COnsidering this Signa~ure-~f propert~-own~ ~_' _ ' ' · . a , -~r or authorlzod ~ SUBMITTED ~NNING BOARD L.ce of the -Planning ;- If your answer .ease indicate ~her appropriate col? ~ No efined Yes :c. ~ ' No .me Yes No ~d Will b~ relied Pp~ication~ dat~ Attachment to questionnaire for~/the Plannihg Board STATE OF NEW YORK~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: Came_~ ~ / to me individual described in'and who exeCuted t and acknowledged that A~ ithe san ,ary Public, No, 24-, Qualified in mission )efore me personall5 :nown to be the e foregoing in'strun I B. KAHN · te of New York ,760499 (ing~ County -~ 1,993 WITH~ Please Complete, sign and return'to the Offi~ Board with your Completed applications forms to any of the f°llowing, questions is v~es, these o~ your guaranteed survey or submlt oth~ evidence~ 1. Are'there any wetland grasses on this parc~ (Attached is a list.o.f the wetland grasses de by the _~own Code, Chapter.97, for Our refe (See DEIS prepared for Cove Be 2. Are ~ch Estat~ there.any other premises under your o abutting this parcel? Other land of Otto Uhl, et al (part of minor subdivision) 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department, or agency?(Town S ~ubdivisi0n - - ,. rate County, Cove Beach Estates"' et 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project on this parce, l? 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning BOard? · 7. Does this pr~perty'have a ' of occupancy, if yes pleass _. , v~l~d certificate - .. ~- ~uumlt a copy of sam~ BSIITT~D ~IN? BOARD of the-Planning If your answer se indicate ~r appropriate ~ No No ~: . · , ~ Yes"'. 'No I certify that,the above Sta~- . on b~th~ P~ann{~m---~ · uments are true " this ap %~?ation. ;. · · .. .. . Signature. of property o~t "..' .. . ..... horized agen~ ~ Attachment to questionnaire for:.'the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF S-~DSLK, came--~to me individual described in' and who executed th~ and acknowledged that ~ -- -~sm~ L, BEN~ZTON KIId Commi~mn 5~r~ J efore me personally ]own to be the foregoing in~strum~ CONSULT YOUR LAWYER air'Oil SIGNING THIS IMeTe. umu~, ---- ~' ~ ~n. (,,nSle Sec,) ..... m.,.~., lellS IHSTRUIdENT SHOULD BI USED BY LAWYEES ONLy THIS INDENTURE, made the 8th day of May n'netee0 hundred and ninety two BETWEEN ' HAROLD REESE, SR., HAROLD REESE, JR., and FREDERICK residing at 855 Sunrise Highway, Lynbrook, New York REESE, party of the first part, and Otto Uhl, Jr., Russell V. Broach, George F. Russ~!l, Harold E. Russel and Frank R. Russel, Sr., all of 9 Derby ',Gad, Port Washington, New York 11050 party of the second part, WITNE~SE. TH, that the party of t ~e first part, in consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereb., ur ....... of ten do!lars ar or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain pot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improven ly ng and ~e~xllC~tlex BEGINNING at a point on the division line formerly Otto Uhl, Jr. et al ~nd land now or forl Sr. et al, said point being sltuate the followin¢ and distances as measured along the division lit or formerly Otto Uhl, Jr. et al and land now or Reese, Sr. et al from the northeasterly corner formerly Constance J. Terry; (1) North 61 deg. 22 min. (2) North 24 deg. 21 min. 14 sec. East 97.6~ 26 sec. West 108.¢ RUNNING thence from said point of beginning min. 26 sec. West along the division line betwee formerly Otto Uhl, Jr. et al and land now or for Sr. et al 325.59 feet to a point; RUNNING thence through land now or formerly et al the following two (2) courses and distances (1) Southeasterly on a curve to the left ha 350.00 feet for a distance of 246.73 feet, (2) South 15 deg. 49 min. 14 see. West 129. division line between land now or formerly Otto U land now or formerly Harold Reese, Sr. et al and of BEGINNING. Containing an area of 10093 square feet. TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, f any of the party of the first ar roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines th · · and all the estate and ri b . ereof, TOGEqI~] HOLD the nrc ' g, ts of the party of the first part m and la said r ', .~.. . .r. m~ses hereto granted unto the Da tv of th~ ~ ..... 4 ~.. ~ ,p.cm~s .se party oz the second part forever. . r. ..... ..-~,,zu part, the heirs or AND the pa~rty of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever exe AND the ar · . ~ , ept as al, p ty of the first part, m eompbanee with Section 13 of the Lien Law, c~ the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and wiU hold the rig' eratlon as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the in' the same first to the payment of the cost of the irhpr~vement before using any part ~ any other p, urpose. The word 'party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has dui), executed this deed I written, PRESENCE OF: I other valuable consideration of the second part, the heirs :nts thereon erected, situate, ~tween land now or terly Harold Reese, two (2) courses between land now Drmerly Harold land now or feet, feet; orth 24 deg. 21 land now or erly Harold Reese, Harold Reese, Sr. 'lng a radius of ~1 feet to the ~1, Jr. et al and :he point or place in and to any streets and R with the appurtenances ~; TO HAVE AND TO successors and assigns of tone or suffered anything ,resaid. venants that the party of ~t to receive such consid- provrment and w apply ' the total of the same for ds indentpre $o requires. ! day and year first above STATE OF NlW TORY. COUNTY Of ~,.9~ SS: personally came to ill,. known r bed in and executed the fort. going inslrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. ~lO~ ~ic, ~ ~ ~ y~ ~u~lifi~ in Na~u STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 , before me pcrsonally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he is the ' of · the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of ~id corporation that the seal affixed to said instrument s such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors' of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. WITH C~OV£NANT AGAINST GRANTOR S AC'TS TITLE NO. TO $TANOAflD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARD OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS Distributed b)~ CHIC~LGO Tll~ld~ INSURANCE COMPANy STATS OF NIW yORk', COUNTY OPJ SS: On the day of 19 , before me personally came to me known to be the individu~il described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. I STATS OP NEW YORK, COUNTY OIi On the day of personally came the subscribing witness to the fi whom I am personally acquainte( sworn, did depose and say that that he'knows described in and who executed that he, said subscribing witn, execute the same; at the same time subscribed h SECTION BLOCK LOT COUNTY OK TOWN Recorded at CHtCAGO TITLE INSI SS: 19 , before me regolng instrument with , who, being, by me duly e resides at No. to be the individual ~e foregoing instrument; Ds, was present and saw ~d that he., said witness, name as w~tness thereto. KANC~ COMPANY Mail to ~ip No. CONSULT YOUR LAWYER IIFORI SIGNING THIS INSTRUIdlNT. THIS INSTRUMINT SHOULD II USID IY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURI~ made the 8th day of May , nineteen hundred and ninety two BETWEF..N Otto Uhl, Jr., Russell V. Broach, Georg~ F. Russel, Harold' E. Russel and Frank R. Russel, Sr., all ~f 9 Derby Road, Port Washington, New York 11050 , party of the first part, and j' HAROLD gEESE, SR., HAROLD REESE, JR., a-d FREDERICK REE~. 1~? / r residing at 855 Sunrise Highway, Lynbrook, New York party of the second part, WIT~r~$ETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improveme lying and JK~:i~Xhe. x BEGINNING at the southeasterly corner of lan, of Otto Uhl, Jr. et al, said point being situate i min. 14 sec. East 97.62 feet as measured along th, between land now or formerly Ott Uhl, Jr. et al a: formerly Harold Reese, Sr. et al from the northea land now or formerly Constance J.Terry; RUNNING thence from said point of beginning. min. 14 sec. West along the division line between formerly Otto Uhl, Jr. et al and land now or form, Sr. et al 97.62 feet to the ngrtheasterly corner formerly Constance J. Terry; ' RUNNING THENCE North 15 deg. 49 min. 14 sec. now or formerly Ott Uhl, Jr. et al 150.89 feet to between land now or formerly Ott Uhl, Jr. et al a: formerly Harold Reese, Sr. et al; RUNNING thence South 24 deg. 21 min. 26 sec. division line between land now or formerly Otto U and land now or formerly Harold Reese, Sr. et al the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing an area of 5258 square feet. TOGETHER with all right, title and interest if any, of the party of the firs~ par roads abutting the above descr bed premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETH! and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premise HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or the party of the second part forever, AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as al AND the party of the first part, in comp lance w th Section 13 of the Lien Law, the first part will receive the consideration for this conxeyance and will hold the eratlon as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the coat of the the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using an part any other purpose. Y iZ. }ther val~ble consideration the second part, the heirs s thereon erected, sit.re, ! now or formerly lorth 61 deg. 22 ~ division line xd land now or ~terly corner of ;outh 61 deg. 22 land now or ~rly Harold Reese, )f land now or East through land the division line ld land now or East along the ~1, Jr. et al [08.02 feet to ~n and to any streets and ,R with the a~urtenances s;TO HAVE AND TO successors and assigns of done or suffered anything aresaid. )venants that the party of ht to receive such consld- aprovement and will apply f the total of the same for ~ indentFre $o requires. ~::~tabove STATE OF )il}K-YOLK, COUNTY OF SS: pOe~ ~ 1 before me to mL' known Io be the individnal described in and w~o executed the foreguing ins~mew~n~ck~)vledged that leNIW YOLK. COUNTY OF SS: day of 19 , before me iD me kn'own,~M~, being by me duly sworn, did depose and my that he that he is the ~ ' ~f __ __ , t~l~rporation described ~. e foregoing ins~Lment; that he knows the ~ato~; that~e~seal affixed to~porat~ seal; tha~iLwas so a~xed by order of the board df director~: of said c~b~ora- tlOn~ame thereto by tike STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NASSAU SS On the~day~ of May, 1992, before me personally came C~'TO OI4k. ~, to me known to be the individual~ described in and who executed the STATI OP NI~ YOLK. COUNTY OF On the ~' day ~f personaily came SS: 19F~, I~efore me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. -~'-'cC wtnNiWYOLK. COUNTY OF SS: day of 19 , before me ess to the foregoing instrument, with whom I am pers~y acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and~hat he resides at No. that he'knows ~ ~'~,t,~Lbe thc individual d~uted the forego~'l~instrument; that he--ness, was-pre-sen~"~d saw ~nd that he, said w~tl~ss, at t%he same time subs~ame as witness there~ %J STATE OF NEW YOKK,. COUNTY OF 4~%SGA~--SS On the %\ day of May, 1992, before me personally came to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and a_qcknowledged_ foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same.~~/~ ~//~/~3~t he executed the same. rgaiu aah ,ale . WITH COVENANT AGAINST CRANTO~,~, ~ N.V~ ,~,ON TITLE NO. n.M~ in Kin~ ~n~I~LOCK ~mMmn ~i~ ~1130, LOT TO STANDARD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARS OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS Distributed by OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL INOTAR¥ PUUUC STATE OF FLORID, I COMMISSION NO. CC167277 COUNTY OR TOW~ MY COMMmSION EXP. bXN. Return Iq, Mail to Zip No. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Wad, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Ma~k S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 So,,thold. NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 15, 1995 Frederick J. Tedeschi, Esq. P.O. Box 321 Greenport. New York 11944 RE: January 19, 1995 correspondence from Frank Russel in regard to Cove Beach Estates Major Subdivision SCTM# 1000-22-3-15.1 $ 18.3, and Harold Reese, Sr.. et al and Otto Uhl, Jr., et al. SCTM~ 1000-22-3-15.1, 18.1 & 18.3 Lot Line Change Dear Mr. Tedeschi: Please find the following in regard to the questions presented in Mr. Russel's letter of January 19, 1995. The paragraph numbers correspond to those of Mr. Russel's letter. ~ 1. Mr. Russel's letter dated December 7, 1994, and the map enc~losed with that letter, are contained in the Planning Board's records for the Cove Beach Major Subdivision. On July 12, 1993, the Planning Board granted conditional final approval to the proposed lot line change for Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Otto Uhl, Jr., et al. Conditional final approval is valid for six (6) months. At the request of the applicant, the Planning B(~ard granted an extension of the conditional approval, which expi July 12, 1994. Charles Cuddy, attorney for the applicant of Beach Estates Major Subdivision, is aware that the condition~ approval for the lot llne change has expired. He has been n~ the procedure that is required to complete the proposed lot change. As of this date, there has not been any action take~ complete the lot line change. 'ed on [he Cove I final ,tilled of ine to Cove Beach Estates February 15, 1995 Page 2 In addition, Condition Number 7 of the Conditional Final Approval for the Major Subdivision of Cove Beach Estates requires that the lot line change be completed. The conditions of approval for the major subdivision will not be fulfilled until such time that the lot line change application is completed. Condition Number 4 of the Conditional Final Approval for th~ Major Subdivision of Cove Beach Estates requires the recording ofi a Homeowners Association. The draft Homeowners Association dn record in the Planning Board office contains, in Article 5, Section 9, notice that the rights of Property Owners in the Association;are subject to all Declarations, Covenants, restrictions, reservat!ions, exceptions, easements, and agreements of record. On January 27. 1995. and on prior occasions. I discussed the right-of-way to Mr. Russel's property with Mr. Cuddy. Mr. Cuddy assured me that his client is aware of the right-of-way to Mr. Russel's property and that it is documented in the title report for his client's property. On January 9, 1995, the Planning Board granted conditional ;final approval to the Cove Beach Estates Major Subdivision. I have enclosed a copy of the conditional approval for your convenience. of this date, the conditions of final approval have not been fulfilled. As I trust the above will answer the questions presented by Mr. Russel. Please feel free to contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely. Planner enc. cc: Mr. Frank R. Russel Mr. Charles R. Cuddy PRO~'ESSIONA L ENGINEER HOE~AJ~T ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 1197J 516-765-2954 February 17, 1994 Richard Ward, Chairman Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Cove Beach Estates - SCTM # 1000-22-3-15.1 & 18.3 Dear Chairman Ward, ~., ,I am co~nsultant for the North Fork Bank Corporation. The bank has takex orme anove rexerenced property. It is the bank's intention to complete the existi~ for the subdivision approval as the applicant. I will be the banks agent for compl. submissions required for the subdivision approval. over ownership tg submissions :tion of all On July 12, 1993 the Board gave a conditional final approval for a lot line~ change required for this subdivision application. The conditional approval required that the deeds ,be recorded. The deeds for the lot line change, have not as yet been flied in the Couhty Clerk s office as required. We request, therefore an extension of the conditional final approval for the lot line change so we may have the time to file the deeds now that we are owners of~e property. I will be contacting the Board within the next few days to set up an inforn}al meeting to review and update the submissions required for this subdivision and to set a publiC hearing on this matter. CC: Lynne M. Gordon - WW&B Michelle Pelletier - NFB Jos ~h Fischetti, P.E. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Oriowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 29, 1994 Joseph Fischetti, Jr., P.E. Hobart Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed lot line change for ~ North Fork Bank Corporation and Otto Uhl, Jr., etial (a.k.a. Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Otto Uhl, Jr., et al) ' SCTM# 1000-22-3-15.1, 18.1 & 18.3 Dear Mr. Fischetti: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold T~wn Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 28, [994: BE IT RESOLVED that the $outhold Town Planning Board g~ant a six (6) month retro-active extension of conditional final approval. Conditional final approval was granted on J~ly 12, 1993. The extension will expire on July 12, 1994 unless all conditions of approval have been fulfilled. Please note that the final maps (5 paper prints) must the change in ownership that has taken place. Please contact this office if you have any questions r the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman ~eflect ~garding Southold Town PlannQ Board 32 12, 1993 Mr. Ward: OK, we're back to hearings held over from previous meetings. We certainly stayed out of order pretty good tonight. Item one is Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Otto Uhl, Jr., et a] - This lot line change between Harold Reese Sr., et al and Otto Uhl, Jr., et al is to convey 10,093 square feet from Harold Reese, Sr. to Otto Uhl, Jr. and to convey 5,2518 square foot from Otto Uhl, Jr. to Harold Reese, Sr. After the lot line change, the Harold Reese, Sr. parcel will be 98.1563 acres and the Otto Uhl, Jr. parcel will be 12.4051 acres. SCTM~ 1000--22--3-]5.~, 18.l & ]8.3. Ben Kinzler: The original preliminary plat plan approxral contains a couple of things. Number one was the exchange of two parcels so as to square off one parcel on the proposed Cove Beach subdivision and to add to, the Uhl--Russell piece a larger piece. Obviously a (inaudible) benefit to them in the exchange, and the reason of course being the ability to Square off that one corner parcel. I understand there was some issue withithe County Planning Beard. Has there been a definition as to what the problem is, if any? Mr. McDonald: We're about to resolve those problems. Mr. Ward: We're writing letters bac~z and forth, there's a communication gap. They've asked whether we're creating new lots, and we're bot. They were asking for numbers on lots, which aren't lots, so I think it this point we're ready to proceed with it. Did you have anything el~e to add? Mr. Kinzler: If the Board has any questions? Mr. Ward: Any questions from the Board? Mr. McDonald: Or anyone else? Joseph Gazza: The neighboring property. I was wondering if th~ Board had the opportunity to question the access. There was a discussion fat our last meeting about the coordination of the two access roads, Cove Be~ch Estates and the Gazza-Lettieri subdivision. It seemed like an opportune time. Mr. Ward: Well, this is not a particular time that the subdivision is before us. This happens to be_ a lot line change of trading two pieces of parcels to even out a piece, that's all. Mr. Gazza: Will the access road serve those lots that will be created by rearrangement? Mr. McDonald: They'll be no change in the parcels. There's a parcel now, there will be a parcel later. The other parcel is existing and ~ccessed elsewhere. So, there is no change in the parcel.(everyone talkihg) Mr. Kinzler: As the roads are already laid out...I became aware!of the issue just this evening. It's allways unfortunate when you have ~ neighbor and you have to wind up meeting him here. But if there was an i~sue certainly we would have been delighted to consider in the inception stage and here we are cominq down to the back end, and very frankly, Ildon,t know how it is at this point in time we would go about cutting throug~ what appears to me, the only way to come through would be to cut through Southold Town PlannQBoard 33 ]2, 1993 existing proposed plots. Mr. McDonald: That's not what he's proposing at all. It will have to be addressed in the SEQR process and the final approval for this subdivision, the major subdivision of which this is trying to facilitate has'not been done, it remains open. Mr. Gazza: I just thought that this might be an excellent opportunity since the land owners are both before you on happen chance on subdivisions -- mine has been pending for five years and... Mr. McDonald: You had indicated to us you had talked to them... Mr. Gazza: Numerous occasions. Mr. McDonald: ...and they had given you answers. Mr. Reese(?): The only discussion I had with Mr. Gazza w-as certainly in regard to once our application was approved, there might be som~ discussion between his subdivision, but I wanted Cove Beach approved flrst~ Mr. McDonald: That's exactly what he relayed to us. Mr. Reese: Yes, so I want Cove Beach approved, and then if he ~ants we can get together somehow, and with the Board's consent, fine, b~t I want it approved first. Mr. Gazza: And the Board ].ed Mr. Lettierl and I to believe at ~ur last meeting that upon payment of the environmental review fees that~the Board would look into the further possibility because of the SEQR pr~ess of coordinating a cor~non access in the interest of proper planning.! Mr. McDonald: We said that in the SEQR process wewould examine' ' the possl-- bilities, those legal possibilities, which exist. And that's w~at we're quired by law to do and that's what we will do, exactly. Mr. Gazza: We're gentlemen appearing before you, is there any ~nllghtenment that you could give on these two applications? I know they' both .been pending for a long time. Mr. McDonald: You want us to give you the answers to the~proces~ without engaging in the process. That I can't do. You had discussions ~ith him already, right? And he has just given you the same response no~ that you said he gave previously. If we get into the process, we'll see What the process brings forward. There are legal considerations that undoubtedly our lawyers, their lawyers and everybody is going to talk about. We can't resolve this here. You've asked him and he's responded here to you again, about it. It's not really pertinent in my m~nd to the application before uS at this moment, which is a lot line change which is a little tiny piece ~f their other project, which is not getting a final approval tonight. It's s~ply a lot llne change which we would like to move ahead on. I understand your frustration in this, but I don't see the connection. Southold Town Plam~ Board y 12, 1993 Mr. Gazza: Well since you have the adjacent property owners before you... Mr. McDonald: That's why I brought up the fact that you've had this discuss-- ion with them already. If the two of you could go out in the hall and sit down and talk and solve it, God bless you. Mr. Kinzler: I think maybe the question you're asking is, what does the Board see as the further process. Mr. McDonald: We haven't made even a determination on Mr. Gazzia's SEQR, because he's asked us to hold it in abeyance while he provides other inform-- ation. There's not even a SEQR determination. Mr. Kinzler: So we're at different stages of the process. Mr. McDonald: Yes, you're a quite different stages. Mr. Gazza: But the common point is the access. I've read the ~EQR reports and the reports focus as the Chairman focused, on the opening o~ my conver-- sation this evening before the Board, on coordinated proper access. Now, my · neighbor says there is going to be no discussion until he completes the sub-- division. Now if he completes the subdivision... Mr. McDonald: You want to get the answer to the process withou~ being in-- volved in the process. You don't leap frog over. You need to e~ter into your part of the process. Then we're going to get involved and undoubtedly there are going to be discussion, legal discussions about this with o~r attorney about what can and can't be done. Mr. Kinzler: I think the perception is not completely accurate my client has said and is intending to say is very simply this, of this thin~ is enormous. We're anxious to get going with the know. To the extent that the Board comes to us or the Town Att to us in the final process and in conjunction with the approval listen will you do us a favor, could you do this instead of doi think we've evidenced an ongoing desire to be flexible, to the requires a side-~tracking and a further delay in the process is we can afford to do. You want us to be reasonable? We're more to be reasonable. Mr. Gazza: I'm trying to be reasonable and I think that ~if we we can get two maps approved at the same time. · I think what look, the cost thing as you )rneys come ~ and says ]g that? I ~-xtent that it %or something than prepared ~ol our efforts Mr. Kinzler: I don't think, in all fairness, it deserves the belaboring of the Board, before whom it does not appear to be an issue, i Mr. Gazza: I've been before the Board for five years, as you've~been maybe longer and I was led to believe that the access issue was the m~jor part of holding up my subdivision application and it may become a stumbling block on yours. Mr. McDonald: What we were trying to impress upon you at the l~st meeting is the same thing -- I haven't been here that long but every tim9 someone's tried to impress on you the sooner you get in the process, the soongr you get the answers. Southold Town Planning Board 35 July 12, 1993 Five years ago, and unfortunately this thing has totally (inaudible) up, but the sooner you get in, the sooner we get the answers. If we continue to sit outside of it, the answers will never come, because until you make an application, you never get an answer. If you can't get an answer to the process without getting into the process. You can't do it. Mr. Orlowski: I've been here 14 years and I've never had one applicant give access to another applicant and it's never happened. I don't eVen know if it's going to happen now. Mr. Gazza: Well, then we might as well build a bridge and scrap the whole idea of coordinated access and the Board should have told Mr. Lettie~i and I that at the last meeting and...why side track us? Mr. McDonald: The answers aren't there until you ask the quest:ons and we go around and go t~hrough the process. You think that we can sit dc wn and make all the decisions withou~ entering in...the public has somethin~ to say about it, the neighbors have ...(change tape). I would ask that we m(ve ahead on this. I would like to move ahead on this particular application. Mr. Ward: What's the pleasure of the Board? Mr. McDonald: Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Chairman, I'd llke to make a motion to close ~he hearing. Second. Mr. Ward: Ail those in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. McDonald: I'd like to make a further motion that ~ard. WHEREAS, Harold Reese, Sr., et al is the owner of the property kDown and designated as SCTM~ 1000--22-3--15.1 & 18.3 and Otto Uhl, Jr., et~l is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM~ 1000--22._3.h18il; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to th~ State iEnvironmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead ~gency and issued a Negative Declaration on May 24, 1993; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of ~he Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOL~/ED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional approval to the surveys dated May 28, 1993 and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to fulfillment of the followingI condition within six (6) months of the date of this resolution: !. Submission of the executed deed for each parcel. Mr. Ward: Is there a second? Southold Town Board 36 I2, 1993 Mr. Orlowski: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. Ail in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Kinzler: I think we already submitted copies of the executed deed? not intend to file it until the final subdivision was approved. Is that acceptable to the Board? We did Mr. Ward: Say that again? Mr. Kinzler: We did not intend to actually swap property until division approval is granted. Mr. Ward: Bo it with the final map? Mr. Kinzler: Yes. (inaudible) Thank you. Mr. Wa~d: Hillcrest Estates -- Section 2 -- This major subdivisl lots on ~2.9 acres located in Orient. SCTM~ question where are you at? the final sub-- is f~ Mr. Kinzler: a meeting a number of months ago wit of the Suffolk County Health. The issue is obviousl, q~allty. And very frankly, while for a variance from Board an~ were denied, we believed and believe that we wou '~ an appropriate redress in the courts. !'ye done in an to avoid t%at is to meet with the Board and hives of Dept. in 9n ~ffort to achieve a compromise and to try solution. At ~helr suggestion we had gone back and had the existing.wells~and ha~ found that with some of the wells been changes in water quality, that there's been a dissipation fr the wa]~ table of some.ofithe co?~aminants that previously eX;s{ but thatXi~ other locatlon~ they still As a result of the ~niti/aR~.rete~ting we've decided toe, rep new ~ells and to see what water quality/rs in other parts of the DroDosedX~mar~] hopeful, and unfort~tely the driller is unable~o~move ~?~-t~e same speed [inaudible)/with respect to the testing, and not only t~ testing but also with_r/~pect to the dropping of a well for the water f~rkthe pumps for the fire/~fepartment. We hope to get that accomplished real ¼u~x~ly. Unfortunately he's not moving as quickly as we would like and un~ortuX~tely we bare ~ control over it. And we hope to get that done shortl~o go~ mplying an~ perhaps averaging out, if you wi] 1, the respectivel-water quality. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 July 13, 1993 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Rd. Great Neck, NY 10021-5306 Re: Lot line change for Harold Reese, Sr. et al and Otto Uhl, Jr. et al SCTM# 1000-22-3-15.1 & 1000-22-3-18.1 & 18.3 Dear Mr. Kinz~er: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold T¢ Planning Board on July 12, 1993: The final public hearing which was opened on May 24, 19~ closed. ~wn 3, was The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Harold Reese, Sr. et al is the owner of the property known and designated as SCTM# 1000-22-3-15.1 & 18.3 andlOtto Uhl, Jr. et al is the owner of the property known & designated as SCTM# 1000-22-3-18.1; and i WHEREAS, this lot line change between Harold Reese, Sr. ~t al and Otto Uhl, Jr. et al is to convey 10,093 square feet from Harold Reese, Sr. to Otto Uhl, Jr. and to convey 5,258 I square feet from Otto Uhl, Jr. to Harold Reese, Sr.; andl WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to tae State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Par~ 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on May 24, 1993; and Page 2 Harold Reese and Otto Uhl lot line change July 13, 1993 WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on July 12, 1993; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; and, be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated May 28, 1993, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to fulfillment of the following condition within six (6 months of the date of this resolution. 1. Submission of the executed deed for each parcel. Please contact this office if you have any further ques ions. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Harold Reese DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY Of SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFN£Y Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Town of $outhold Planning Board Main Road $outhold, NY 11791 Re: July 9, 1993 Map of Lot-Line Change Between Land of Harold Reese, Sr. and Land of Otto Uhl, Jr. et. al. Prepared for Cove Beach Estates al Proposed Set-Off Map of Propsrty Surveyad for Randy Lacy at East Marion Proposed Set-Off ~de for Jack & b~rgaret Stern at al. Ea~t Marion Ori~fnt Please be advised ~hat pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV I County Ad~inistrative Code, and at the meeting of the Suffolk Commission on July 7, 1993 the Commission reviewed the above re: notices of noncompliance, and after due study and deliberation, the majority of its members voted to return the referrals becaus noncompliance with requirements for notice and maps as stipulate Informational Bulletin No. 9 of the Suffolk County Flanning Corox *Except for item-~ already received that ware requested in the in of 4/26/93 and 6/3/93. Very truly yours, ~ ~ ................ ~ Harold A. Withers '~ Deputy Director of ~'--~'=?~:'~.._3 .... S/s Frank D~ltn~, Sr. ~la~ner '~:~: ~;~:0 Subdivision Review )ivlsion FD:mb ................... ~ ...... I NOTE: Please consult Suffolk County Department of Planning Info~tional No. 9 for complete referral requirements. f the Suffolk unty Planning errals and the by a motion of :omplete notices Bulletin NNING BOARD MEMBERS ;nnett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 15, 1993 Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Rd. Great Neck, NY 10021-5306 Re: Lot line change for Harold Reese, Sr. et al and Otto Uhl, Jr. et al SCTM# 1000-22-3-15.1 & 1000-22-3-18.1 & 18.3 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following took place at the meeting of the Southol¢ Planning Board on Monday, June 14, 1993: The final public hearing which was opened on May 24, 1~ again held open until the Board receives a final report Suffolk County Planning Commission. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Harold Reese, Jr. SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Town 13, was from the Fype IMPORTANT File Numbez N1--473800--¢ Use the above number correspondence about; To the Lead Agency: The above information confirms that filings on th Negative Declamation weme officially meceived by, and SE©R Repository on the date(s) shown in the box heade¢ above. The date and time in the second line show wher doct4ment was pminted. Please check the information ab For corrections om questions contact Charles Lockrow, om write to: SEQR Repository NYSDEC Division of Regul 50 Wolf Road, Room Albany, NY 12233 0866 n all this action! e described entered im the DATE RECEIVED this ove carefully. (5Ia)&57-222&, atory Affairs Town of SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road-P.O. Southold, NY 11971 Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 4, 1993 Frank Dowling Suffolk County Dept. of Planning H. Lee Dennison Building Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Lot Line Change Harold Reese Sr., et al and Otto Uhl, Jr., et al East Marion SCTM# 1000-22-3-15.1, 18.1 & 18.3 Dear Mr. Dowling: Enclosed please find (3) three revised maps for the mentioned lot line change. Please schedule this proposal for review by the Suffc Planning Commission. SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax {516) 765-1823 ,ove Lk County Sincerely, Planner YOUNG & YOUNG PLANNING, ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 119OI Telephone 516-727-2303 Facsimile 516-727-0144 June 2, 1991 ATTN: Ms. Melissa Spiro Town of Southold Planning Department Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Map of Lot-Line Change Between Land of Harold Reese, Sr. et al and Land of Otto Uhl, Jr. et al Prepared for COVE BEACH ESTATES at East Marion, T/O Southold, New York (85-0888) Dear Melissa: Enclosed herewith are five (5) prints of the above map, last dated May 28, 1993, amended to indicate the ad parcel of land of Otto Uhl, Jr. et al pursuant to your dated May 13, 1993. cc: Mr. Harold Reese, Jr. + 1 Print Ben Kinzler, Esq. + 1 Print Very truly your Kenneth F. Abruz captioned ditional etter ALDEN W. YOUNG HOWARD W. YOUNG THOMAS C. WOLPERT KENNETH F. ABRUZZO Professional Engineer Land Surveyor Professional Engineer Land Surveyor & Land Surveyor , SOUTHOLD TOWN PLUG BOARD 6 MAY 1993 been met; all the requirements of the Town of ~refore, be it RESOLVED, authorize the Chai 25, 1993. e Southold Town endorse the f )rove and January Mr. Edwards: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion sec~ Ail in favor? Ayes: Mr. Edwa McDonald, Mr. Mr. Or Mr. Latham Mr. Motion carried. (Chairman endorsed maps). Mr. Ward: 7:45 p.m. Harold Reese, Sr. et al & Otto Uh] al. This lot line change between Harold Reese, Sr. et and Otto Uhl, Jr. et al is to convey 10,093 square feet Harold Reese, Sr. to Otto Uhl, Jr. and to convey 5,258 square feet from Otto Uhl, Jr. to Harold Reese, Sr. Af thelot line change the Harold Reese, Sr. parcel will b 98.1563 acres and the Otto Uhl, Jr. parcel will be 12.~ acres. SCTM #1000-22-3-15.1, 18.1 & 18.3. Mr. McDonald: I would like to make a motion to hold t! hearing open. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. Ail those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Edwards, Mr. McDonald. Mr. Ward: Hearings Opposed? Motion carried. From Previous Meetings: Jr, al from ;er .S Mr. Ward: Hill( subdivision is for SCTM #1000-13-2-8.5. Mr. McDonald: I Mr. ~. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. major acres located in this hearing open. Ail those in Orient. SOUTHOLD TOWN PLUG BOARD 13 MAY }, 1993 RE~ under th( itself as of non-signi unlisted act Mr. Edwards: that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting Environmental Quality Review Act, established and as lead agency makes a det( and grants a Negative Declaration ~n the Se( Mr. Ward: Motion Ayes: Mr. Edwards, Mr. Mr. Ward, Mr. Ail those in favor? Mr. McDonald, Mr. Ward~ Opposed? Motioz Mr. Ward: San Simeon Retirement SCTM #1000-45-2-p.o 10.2. & Nursil Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Chairman, RESOLVED that the under the State itself as lead agency, of non-significance unlisted action. Town ~uality ~ lead agency nts a Negative to make a mo~ Board, a( a dete this Mr. Latham: Sec( Mr. Ward: Mo~ seconded. Ail those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Mr. Ward, Mr. Orlowski, ~ld, Mr. Edwards. Mr. Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Ward: Harold Reese Sr., et al & Otto Uhl Jr., et SCTM #1000-22-3-15.1 and 1000-22-3-18.1 & 18.3 Mr. McDonald: Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a mot RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, ac under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assum~ agency status, and as lead agency, make a determination · non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. Ail those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward, Mr. Orlowski, on. ~ng ~.lead of Mr. McDonald, Mr. Edwards. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Russell: What does that mean? You are speaking soI fast I can't even hear you. i Mr. Ward: It basically means that you are through the ~EQRA process. It is completed and it has been granted a Negative Declaration prepared by this Board. Mr. McDonald: There is no Environmental Significance t you are proposing. Mr. Russell: So, what does this mean? Mr. McDonald: It means it is another requirement of th The State requires us to examine as to whether there is Environmental Impact by what you are doing before we ma other decisions. Mr. Russell: This has not been done yet? Mr.~McDonald: We just did it. Ms. Spiro: Mark, I think he is questioning Cove Beach i not the lot line change which are two different applica' Mr. Ward: This has to do with the action on the lot li] Mr. Russell: Oh, we are still on the lot line change. Mr. Ward: Correct. Mr. Russell: We're not on the approval of Cove Beach E~ Mr. Ward: No. Mr. McDonald: Cove Beach Estates is the big subdivisio! Ms. Spiro: Right. Mr. McDonald: That is presently being held at Health rJ Ms. Spiro: Right. Mr. Ward: What we just did has to do with the Lot Line Mr. Russell: Cove Beach Estates is still being held up Health approval. Mr. McDonald: The best I understand it yes, they haven' the problems with the Health Department yet. The Health Department told them they need a public water supply. what any ce any ~states ~ions. ~e change. ;tates? right? ht? Change. on a t solved SOUTHOLD TOWN PLUG BOARD 15 MAY 1993 Gerry McLean: We haven't heard anything about that, pUblic water supply. We got the approval long ago. Ms. Spiro: We never heard anything about it. Gerry McLean: I think you are talking about Hillcrest Estates. Mr. Ward: No. Mr. Russell: I just don't understand, we have had appr and off and on and off. Everyone talking. Mr. McDonald: That was sent to the Health Department a went to the Board of Review and the Board of Review den and told them they need the community water supply syst Mr. Russell: You mean a water main going down the Main Mr. McDonald: Not necessarily down the Main Road maybe somewhere on site instead of having all separate wells have to have a community water supply. Everyone talking. Ms. Scopaz: I don't recall whether they have Health Department approval. I doubt it with the water. I th have to test each separately. In other words, if they put it in the community system (inaudible). Everyone talking. Mr. McDonald: Drill on every lot? Ms. Scopaz: We would have to check the files on it. Mr. Russell: Could the Planning Board please give us a situation of what Cove Beach and we are required to do? just dragging on for months and months and years and coming up and telling us we have to do something else al time. Mr. Orlowski: We are not telling you, the Health DeparJ telling us. Mr. Reese was in here two months ago. · Gerry McLean: He was suppose to be in here tonight witl lawyer, I don't know what happened. Ms. Spiro: They called and said they weren't coming to hearing. Unknown woman: Oh. ovals on nd then ied it mm there. Road? they they ~idn't definite It is L keep on .1 the ~ent is his the SOU HOLD OWH 16 YO' 1993 Mr. Orlowski: He is familiar with all of this, he waslhere two months ago and we discussed it. Mr. Ward: We will get the file and take a look for yo~ but subject tonight was primarily the lot line change and ~he environmental review was the subject of that. / SITE the Determir : Mr. Ward: structure 21 SCTM #1000-85 Vineyards - This site plan is for a 16'2: to house toilet facilities. 15. Mr. McDonald: Chairman, I would like to offel WHEREAS, property known and #1000-85-2-15, local Damianos is the owner signated as Pindar at Main Road in :ion. WHEREAS, a forma[ plan was submitted on ~lication for the ~oval of site ~h 5, 1993; and PlannJ ~rd, to the Act ~ 8), 617, Negative Decl~ ~ation on WHEREAS, the Southo State Environmental declared itself Lead Agency May 3, 1993; and WHEREAS, all the requireme of the Town of Southold have be~ RESOLVED, that the 'conditional final approval and authorize the Chs' to fulfillment of the fo] be met within six (6) sndors .ngcond~ of the da' the Site Plan Re~ xlations t; and be it, therei~ore Planning Board gri dated May 10, 1993, final surveys subject All condit:.ons must of this reso ~ion. 1. Certificat the Senior Bui[ 2. Health tment approval. Mr. Latham: .ng Inspector. Mr. Ward: Ayes: seconded. Ail those in favo] Mr. Orlowski, Mr. McDonald, Edwards~ Mr. Ward. Mr. Opposed? Motion carried. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE MARY May 17, 1993 Melissa Spiro Town of Southold Town Hall - 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southuld, New York 11971 RE: Lot Line Change for Harold Reese Sr. SCTM #: 1000-22-3-15.1, 18.1 & 18.3 Dear Ms. Spiro: The Suffolk County Depamnent of Health Services (SCDHS) has received your letter dated concerning the above-referenced application, and has no objection to the Town's designation a~ This correspondence is intended primarily to expedite the procedural requirements of SEQR establishment of lead agency. The comments provided below axe, therefore, general in nature, most common concerns regarding Suffolk County projects. The depattment wishes, however, provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) established for this action. I. Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water su the authority and requirements of Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the SCSC. Applications must con density and construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Applicants should construction of, or connection to, either system without Health Department approval. Where applicable, the department regulates the storage, handling and discharge of restricted materials pursuant to the requirements of Asticles 7 & 12 of the SCSC. If an application has not yet been submitted to the SCDHS, one should be filed at the earlies~ technical review of the proposed action. Project designs submitted to the department should' any action currently under review through the SEQRA process. Design and flow specifications, information regarding subsurface soil conditions, water SUl~ complete design details are essential to the review of this project, and are evaluated fully at ~ review. Should the town require additional environmental information (such as a DEIS), disc rcquuements of thc SCDHS should be required. accommodate subsurface sanitary disposal systems constructed in conformance Of particular concern to the department are those areas which because of elevated groundwal which are not conducive to the proper functioning of conventional subsurface sanitary sewag agency should be aware that such conditions frequently require the use of fi/1 or the excavath April 12, 1993, lead agency. ~, porraining to the presenting several of our reserve its tight to ly systems, pmsuant to ply with all relevant not undertake the !oxic and hazardous date to allow for the fully consistent with [y information, and ~e time of application assion of the compliance ~r conditions, or soils disposal systems. Your n of subsurface soils to 201993 ;'!: Letter to Melissa Spiro May 17 1993 Page 2 6. The department is also significantly concerned with areas where access to potable water ma unacceptable groundwater quality and the lack of an available public water supply. AH priv~ must be constructed in conformance with requirements of the SCSC. H. NATURAL RESOURCES: The SCDHS fully supports all efforts to maximize protection of natural resources which ma construction and development activities. It is the position of the department that the SEQRA the greatest opportunity for comprehensive consideration of these resources, and that aH pm measures should be employed to help ensure their protection. Of pa~icular concern to department is the adequate protection of weflande, surface waters, ~ contiguous natural habitats, and rare, threatened and endangered species. In addition, efforts physical resources such groundwatem, dunes, bluffs, shorelines, natural drainage channels, l areas, and steep slopes are fully supported and encouraged by the SCDHS. In general, the department encourages the following land use measures be considered (wheo being reviewed pursuant to SEQRA. 1. Maximum practicable setba~ f~om aH weti , surface waters, dunes, and bluffs. 2. Non-disturbance buffers between wetland limits and required stmctund setbacks. 3. Clustering of subdivision lots to provide for maximum preservation of large contiguous a space. 4. Stringent clearing limitations which can reduce potential impacts to wildlife habitats, ve unconsolidated soils. 5. Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less than 10t 6. Maximum use of native species for landscaping purposes. 7. Construction of recharge areas, so as to minimize the amount of disturhence and sh'uctura 8. Maximum use of land-banked parking on commercial sites. 9. Minimal use of fertilizer-dependant turf and landscaping. 10. Employment of stonnwater runoff comrul measures necessary to maintain runoff ou-alte. The depamnent appreciates the opportunity to participate in the SEQRA review of this prop¢ information may be provided prior to the close of the established comment period. Should you t require additional information, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078. KS/amf Sincerely, Kimberly Shaw Sr. Environmental Anal Office of Ecology cc: Vito Minei, P.E. Stephen Costa, P.E. / he constrained by :te water supply systems t he impacted upon by review process provides Mcable planning ~atural communities, to protect sensitive roundwater recharge appropriate) to actions eas of dedicated open ~tative communities, and modification to the site. ~al. Additional ave any questions or PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 May 25, 1993 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ben Kinzler 40 Cutter Mill Rd. Great Neck, New York 11021-5306 RE: Lot Line Change for Harold Reese, Sr. et al and Otto Uhl, Jr. et al SCT~# lS. 3 Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following took place at the meeting of the Southold Planning Board on Monday, May 24, 1993: The final public hearing which was opened at 7:45 P.M. open until the Board receives a final report from the S County Planning Commission. You were asked in a letter dated May 13, 1993, to subm~ additional information to complete the application bef~ Suffolk County Planning Commission. The Planning Board forward this information to the Planning Commission receipt. The hearing will be continued at the Board's n, meeting which is on June 14, 1993. However, the hearing be closed until the Board receives the report from the County Planning Commission. It was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assum agency status, and as lead agency, make a determination non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. A copy of the Negative Declaration is enclosed for your Please note that prior to any endorsement of the final n must submit a notarized letter signed by all parties in~ with the lot line application that. upon approval of the Sco~r'F L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Town fas held lffolk 2 :e the *ill }xt will not luffolk [cting lead of records. ap, you olved lot line Reese/Uhl May 25, 1993 Page 2 change the land conveyances indicated on the map shall with the respective parcels and shall not become separa parcels of land. Please contact this office if you have any questions re. the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman Encl. cc: Harold Reese Jr. )e merged 5e arding PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr, Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant May 24, 1993 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the imple regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmenta Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has d that the proposed action described below will not have significant effect on the environment and a Draft Envir Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Lot line change for Harold Reese, Sr. Otto Uhl, Jr. SCTM#: Location: 1000-22-3-15.1 and 18.1 & 18.3 East Marion SEQR Status: Type I ( X ) Unlisted ( ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Description of Action: Yes ( ) No (X) This lot line change between Harold Reese, Sr. et al an( Uhl, Jr. et al is to convey 10,093 square feet from Hare Reese, Sr. to Otto Uhl, Jr. and to convey 5,258 square from Otto Uhl, Jr. to Harold Reese, Sr. After the lot change, the Harold Reese, Sr. parcel will be 98.1563 ac and the Otto Uhl, Jr. parcel will be 12.4051 acres. SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 ~enting Quality termined ~nmental ~t al and [ Otto ,ld ~eet ine es Page 2 Harold Reese/Otto Uhl Lot Line Change May 24, 1993 - Negative Decla~ation Reasons Supporting This Determination An Environmental Assessment Form has been sUbmitt reviewed, and it was determined that no signific~ effects to the environment were likely to occur project be implemented as planned. The application as presented is a lot line change does not create additional parcels or change the teristics of the area. Correspondence has not been received from the New State Department of Environmental Conservation in allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that the are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Thomas Jorling, DEC Comm., Albany Suffolk County Planning Commission Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant ~d and Lt adverse ~ould the that harac- York the e 1,4-16-2 (~/g7)-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The tull I-/\1~ is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, ~n an orderly manner, or action may be significant The question of whether an action may be significant is not always ly, there are aspects of a protect that are subjective or unmeasureabJe It is also understood significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technicall analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the I the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assu process ba.s been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of informatior Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a proj~ct or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or u hether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or r~duced. Part 3: if any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. whether a project .~asy to answer. Frequent- ~at those who determine expert in environmental ~ader concerns affecting d that the determination to fit a project or action. dentifying basic proiect DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Ac Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [~ Part I i;! Part 2 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it ~s reasonai lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, have a Significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration, [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there wi effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that ma,/hav~ on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Lot Line Change Between Land of Harold Reese, Sr. et al and Land of et al - Cove Beach Estates Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print ~sible Officer in Lead Agency TiUe of Responsible Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency S)gnature of Preparer ( f d fferent fro~ / Jte [ions []Part 3 any other supporting ly determined by the s one which will not viii be p~epared. I not be a significant ~ have been required, a significant ~mpact Otto Uhl, Jr. )fficer responsible officer) R - --PROJECT INFORMATI Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is desi[[ned to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have ~ significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form, PartsA through E, Answers to these! questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public ~leview. P,rovide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently , new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unav, each instance. NAME OF ACTION Lot Linc Changc Bctwccn Land of Harold Reese, Sr. et Land of Otto Uhl, Jr. et al - Covc Bcach Estates LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and Coun[y) North Side of Main Road 1,776 feet east of Stars Road, NAME OF ~o~'~'SPONSOR Young & Young ADDRESS 400 Ostrander Avenue CITY/PO Riverhead, NAME OF OWNER (il dme~e~t) Harold Reese, Sr. et al & Otto Uhl, Jr. et al c/o Frank Russel, Sr. 9 Derby Road East Mario ADDRESS 855 Sunrise Hwy. CITY/PO Lynbrook, NY 11563 OESCRIPTION OF ACTION Port Washington, NY 11050 The application consists of the conveyance of a 10,093 S.F. parceJ Harold Reese, Sr. et al to Otto Uhl, Jr. et al and the conveyance parcel from Otto Uhl, Jr. et at to Harold Reese, Sr. et al. Please Complete Ea~:h Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [~0rban [Dlndustrial r-iCommercial I-1Residential (subul [qForest [~Agriculture fqOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 0.3524 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 acres Forested 0.3524 acres Agricultural {Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 Wetland {Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 oi' ECL) 0 acres Water Surface Area 0 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 Other {Indicate type} 0 3. What is predominant soil type{s) on project site? Plymouth loamy sand, 3 to 8~ a. Soil drainage: []Well drained 100 % of site OModerately well drained OPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil gr, Land Classific.ation System? . N/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? I~Yes IX]No a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet) ~vailable and will not involve Jable, so indicate and specify and Suffolk County, NY ISJNESS TELEPHONE 51~ 727-2303 STATE ZIP CODE NY 11901 SINESS TELEPHONE ) STATE ZIP CODE from of a 5,258 S.F. ban) IglRural (non-farm) AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres O. 3524 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 acres slopes % of site ~up 1 through 4 of the NYS 2 5~ Ap'proXimate percentage of proposed ect~.,e with slopes: [~0-10% 10 %( [10-15% % [15% or greater _ i % 6. Is project substantially contiguous 'to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on tl~e State or the National Registers of Historic Places? [Yes []No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landn irks? ['-]Yes l~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? . 30' (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, pr nc pal or sole source aquifer? D3Yes [No : 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? eyes 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as thr,~atened or endangered.~ E]Yes [No' According to Youncl & Young Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, othe geological formations) [Yes []No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open I-Wes [~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [Yes [~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name b. Size (In acres 17. Is the site served by existing public ut lities? [Yes I~No bl/A a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? I-lYes [No N/A b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? E]Yes I~No ~/A 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Marl Section 303 and 304? [Yes []No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designat~ of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [Yes I~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? []Yes [] B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor _98.2673 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: _ ~/A acres initially; _. ~I/A acrel c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped [~/A acres. d. Length of proiect, in miles: ['¢/A (If appropriate) e. If the proiect is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ' [~/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A ; proposed _ N/A . g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~/A (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: ~/A One Family Two Family Multiple Family Cc Initially Ultimately i.. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proppsed structure _N/A height; width; . j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A ft. ce or recreation area~ ts Law, Article pursuant to Article 12.2941 A-C~es o~led b~ Jltimately (Toro [J~].t Jr. r ndominium length. 2'I. Wil~ project result in an increase in energy use? []Yes I~No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [3Yes If Yes, explain ,~. ~ow much natural material ,'th, etc.) will be removed from ( I 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? I-lyes l/No ~]N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes ~lNo t~/A c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [Yes ONo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) Will be removed from sit~ 0 ' . . acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be rtmoved by this project? I--lyes ~]No 6. If single ~hase project: Anticipated period of construction N/A months, (inclUding demolition). 7. If multi-phased: i~/A , . a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month .~ar, {including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month !ar. d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [Yes fi'lNo 8. Will blasting occur during construction~ I'-lyes l/No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction N/A ; after project is compl~ 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities~ [-1yes ~]No yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved.~ I-IYes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes l/No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? I-1' es ~]No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~lyes INo 16. Will the project generate solid waste~ r-lyes a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used~ [Yes [No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes nol go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill~ I-lyes l/No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes E~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal~ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life.~ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [/-lyes 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day);~ I-lyes r~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? gallons/minute. ~No - 25. Approvals Required: Type' Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ~lYes I-INo C--i~, Town, \'i'.'.a.z Planning Board r~Yes C1No City, Town Zoning Board I-Wes I-INo City. County Hea!th Department F'IYes nNo Other Local Agencies I-lYes E3No Other Regional Agencies I-lyes I-INo State Agencies r-]Yes f-INo Federal Agencies l-lYes I'-~No Lot Line Change 3/91 C. Zoning and Planning Information I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? []Yes C1No If Yes, indicate decision required: I-Izoning amendment ~]zoning variance nspecial use permit []subdivisio~ f"tsite plan [3new/revision of master plan ['-]resource mana. gement plan I~other LOt L~ne Change 2, What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Residential Low Density A / 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the~ presen[ zoning; N/A / 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by N/A th( proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use 7. What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a 14 mile radius Residential/Aoricultural - Residential Low Density A 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoinin~surrounding land uses within a % 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? N/A 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water dis~ 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services [recn fire protection)? E]Yes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand~ ~]Yes 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic.~ D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which avoid them. ~ E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ~'~Sponsor Name Thomas C. Wolpert Signature ~/'/~;~'~'~ C~-. ~/c~.,~_~-f~'.~ Title Professional Engi If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessmen with this assessment. dans? ; ~Yes f proposed action? F'INo mile? ;; ~Yes E]No ricts? ~Yes [~No ation, education, police, -1No reis? [:]Yes [~No r-lYes [:]No .~ or may be any adverse )u propose to mitigate or te ~ Form before proceeding IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? [~NO F'IYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year .as a result of this project. * Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ' · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: 1 ; 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large, Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] J [] J-lYes I-1No [] [] (-]Yes r-INo [] [] []Yes I--INo [] [] []Yes I--INo [] [] I-lYes I--INo [] [] I--lyes [-iNo [] [] I-~Yes []No [] [] I--lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy reJa potential adverse environmental impacts? [~NO If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proce Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact[s) is considered to be potentially large, mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1~ Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe [if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moder 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversb ty, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled ~ The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact (Continue on attachments) ed to rqYES ImpaCt or ed to Part 3 IMPACTS even if the impactCs) may be te impact by project change(s). ~act is important. 11 Part 2~I~R(.~ "CT ~MPACTS AND THEII~IAC~ iT!UDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information {Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it s also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it.be looked at further. · · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and whE fever possible the threshold ot magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally appii :able throughout the State an( for most situations But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriat( for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, th~ examples are illustrative an( have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thr holds to answer each question · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each que! on. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects Instruclions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answer~. "' c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to in icate the potential size of th.- impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. II impact will occur but threshob is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentiall/large and proceed to PART 3 e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in th( project to a small to mod·rah impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. Thi must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to,thee project site~' ~NO r-lyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the generat slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i e., rock or soil) per year. · Constluct~on or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction m a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2 Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual lanc~rms found on the site? (i e. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc~NO f-WES · · Specific [and forms: I 2 Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change i-]Yes [-INo r-lyes i--]No [Yes I-1No [-~Yes i'~No f-lYes E]No [~Yes [-INo E~Yes []No f-lYes L-'~No i-lYes [-]No i--]Yes [-INo IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body desi§nated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) r3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ~ Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existin~tor new body of water? J)~O I-lYE S Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ~NO i-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. . · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemica~ products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patte~rns~ or surface · water runoff? , (/~10 ['-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · P_rol~osed .~_t.i(~n w,o~ld change flood water flows. ? I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate L~rge Mitigated By impact Impact Project Change [] [] I-lYes []No [] lEI I--lYes []No i [] [] []Yes r-INo [] [] E]Yes r']No [] I-lyes I--INo [] I-lYes []No [] E]Yes I-1No [] I-lyes I'-INo [] E]Yes I-INo [] []Yes I--INo [] I-lyes [] fi'lyes I'-] No [] nyes I-~No [] I--lyes []No [] F-lYes I-INo [] E3Yes E3No [] []Yes I-]No [] I-lyes E]No [] : E]Yes E]No [] fi-lYes I'--INo [] I--lyes J-lNo · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Ac:tion is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow developmer!t in a designated floodway. · ' Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality~ ~10 C]YE$ Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 miltion BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON' PLAN~S AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? )~t~N O I-IyFS Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New Yo.rk or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threate~ned or non-endangered species? [~10 r-lyEs Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources[' ~ r~YES Examples that wduld apply to column 2 · The proposed action woutd sever, cross or limit access to a§ricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) I 12 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate L~rge Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change i [] --I ["-lyes [-INo [] -'1 []Yes []No [] r--] []Yes [-INo [] [] [E]Yes I-1No [] [] rlYes nNo [] [] I-lyes []No [] [] EE]¥es []No [] [] I-lyes F'INo [] [] E]Yes []No [] [] []Yes r-INo [] [] E]Yes i-INo [] [] E]¥es []No [] [] E]¥es []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []'res F-INo [] [] r-lYes []No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Wil~ proposed action affect aesthetic resources.~ ~NO C3YES (if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding [and use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure o~ historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance~ ~,NO I-iYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or Jpen spaces or recreational opportunities? that would apply to column 2 ~NO DYES anent foreclosure of a future recreational~---opportunity. reduction of an open space important to the community. ~pacts: ~r-~ 2 3 Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact Impact' i Project Ch'ange [] [] I--lYes []No [] [] I'lYes i--INo [] [] []Yes ['"]No []' [] ~Yes I--INo [] [] :3Yes []No [] [] i []Yes ~No [] [] · E3Yes [] [] ~¥es []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [3Yes i'qNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E3Yes []~0 [] [] []Yes ~No [] [] []Yes []No 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ~NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people andjor goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ~NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibrat_i~)n as a result of the Proposed Action? ~10 [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: Small to ' Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large ,I Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] -1 []Yes []No [] ~ []Yes []No [] -'] i []Yes ['-] No [] [] I--iYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E3Yes []No [] [] []Yes I-]No [] [] I--]Yes i--INo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E3No [] E3 []Yes I-INo [] [] []Yes r-lNo [] [] I-lyes []No [] [] []Yes i-]No [] [] []Yes E3N0 [] [] []Yes []No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe~o DYES Examples that woutd apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage faci{[ties for one mi(lion or more gallons of liquffied natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within'2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: 10 · · L. LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Sec- tion 276 of the Towo Law, a public hearing will bc held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 24th day of May 1993 on the question of the following: 7:30 p.m. Final approval of the minor subdivision for Hanauer/Bagley - Too Bee Realty, at Southold, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of N¢~v York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 100-50-6-4 & 5. The property is bordered on the north by land now or formerly of Hanauer & Bagley; on the east by Lighthouse Road; on the south by land now or former- ly of A. McGunnigle; on the west by land now or formerly of A. Stepnoski. 7:35 P.M. Final approval for 4 lot line changes being pro- cessed concurrently for the Harbes Farm at Matt;tuck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number. 1000-120-3-11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, & 11.6. The property is bordered on the north by Sound Ave.; on the west by land now or formerly Kajawski, Big E, and easterly line of Riverhead Town; on the east by land now or formerly of Lebkuecker, Nedoszytko, Bakowski, and Aldrich Lane; on the south by land now or formerly of Cain and Lebkuecker. 7::40 P.M. Final approval for the lot line change for the Estate of Evangeline A. Meyer at Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number. 100-111-8-5 & 6. The property is bordered on the west by Wunneweta Road; on the east by Nassau Point Road; on the south by land now or formerly Edward A. Meyer and wife; on the north by land now or formerly of Martin J. Vandyne and Phyllis Vandyne. 7:45 P.M. Final approval for the lot line change for Harold Reese ~? Ct al, and O~O UI~ Sr.~ ~ t~/,~li~East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suf- folk, State of New York. Suf- folk County Tax Ma Number. 100-22-3-15.1, 18.1 ~[ 18.3. The property is bordered on the north by Dam Pond and Long Island Sound; on the west by land now or formerly of Otto Uhl Jr., et al, George E Russel, Otto Uhl Jr., Russell V. and Catherine Broach and Frank R. Russel; on the south by land now or formerly of Margaret Gruimaris~ Dorothy E. Cook and John and Luz Psaroudahis; on the east by land now or formerly of Myron B. Brown, Frank E. Begom, Jr. and Iris R. Begora, Ronald Edeen, Jr. and Bar- bara Edeen, Frank R. Russel and others, Andrew Lettieri, Joseph Frederick Gazzo, Ber- nice Lattieri, and Joseph Frederick Gazza. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place specified. Dated: May 11, 1993 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Richard G. Ward Chairman 1X-5/13/93(1) CQUN[Y OF SUF SIAIE ()F NEW YORk'. Patricia Wood, being duly _~worn, says that she is tile Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the arnexed is a printed copy, has been published in said I_ong Island 'l'ravelcr-Watchm;m once each week fol ................... ./. ...... weeks sJ¢cessiv¢ly, commencing ol~ the ........... . .......... Sworn tol)efole me Ibis ............. ' ........ (lay ol Notary Public BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER NOTARY Pt b. (,, Shte ol ~Xe',,~ York ~h, 4SOfi346 Qualified in Su[',cI~ County PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 %*2. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 13, 1993 Ben Kinzler 147 Willis Avenue Mineola, New York 11501 RE: Lot Line Change for Harold Reese, and Otto Uhl, Jr. et al SCTM# 1000-22-3-15.1 and 1000-22-3-18.1 & 18.3 Sr. et al Dear Mr. Kinzler: Enclosed please find a copy of a notice from the Suffol~ Planning Commission stating that the referral for the ak mentioned Lot Line change is incomplete. I have discussed the notice with both Frank Dowling of County Department of Planning and Ken Abruzzo of Young Young. In regard to Number 1 of the report, the maps are accep originally presented. In regard to Number 2 of the repor original map indicated a sixth parcel adjacent to the so when in fact this area is part of the 12,2941 acre parce by Otto Uhl, Jr. & Others to the south side of the right-of-way. Mr. Abruzzo will amend the map to show bot areas as one parcel. Upon submission of five revised maps, three copies will forwarded to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for Sincerely, Melissa Spir~ Planner Encl. cc: Kenneth Abuzzo, Young and Young SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 i Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 County )ve he able as t, the /nd, owned :eview. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ~COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERt J, GAf f NeY SUFFOLK COUNTY eXECUTIVE Mr. Bennett Orlowskt, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold PlanninE Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 April 26, 1993 Preliminary X Fin~ Plat Name: Lotline Subdivision Harold Reese Sr., et.al. & Otto Uhl, Tax Map #: 1000-22.3-15.1, 18.1, 18.2 SCPD File No.: 133-INC-93-07 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Please be advised that pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of County Administrative Code, the above referral will not be reviewe{ County Planning Commission because of noncompliance with requiremez and maps as stipulated in Informational Bulletin #9 of the Suffolk Commission. The staff has checked the above referenced referral and find that and that the following items are required: 1. 3 copies of map w/appropriate title, lot numbers if new lots al created. 2. Reason for differences between survey & Tax Map. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning S/s Frank Dowlin~, Sr. Plat FD:mb Subdivision Review DivJ NOTE: Please consult Suffolk County Department of Planning Informa~ Bulletin No. 9 for complete referral requirements. Jr, et.al. ~e Suffolk by the Suffolk :s for notice 2ounty Planning is incomplete being er sion ional PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 May 4, 1993 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ben Kinzler 147 Willis Avenue Mineola, New York 11501 RE: Lot Line Change for Harold Reese, Sr. et al and Otto Uhl, Jr. et al SCTM~ Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Towl Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 3, 1993: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, May 24, 1993 at 7:45 P.M. for a final public hea the maps dated February 28, 1992. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Harold Reese Jr. SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor 'own Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516 765-1823 ing on PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 13, 1993 Ben Kinzler 147 Willis Avenue Mineola, New York 11501 RE: Lot Line Change f¢ Harold Reese, Sr. Otto Uhl, Jr. et ~ SCTM# 1000-22-3-15 1000-22-3-1~ Dear Mr. Kinzler: The following resolution was adopted by the South¢ Planning Board on Monday, April 12, 1993. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Bog the lead agency coordination process on this Type 1 act proposed Lot Line change has been classified as a Type under the State Environmental Quality Review Act becaus subject property is located within 500 feet of a Critic Environmental Area {Dam Pond). Please contact this office if you have any questic regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Harold Reese Jr. SCOTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ' Fax (516) 765-1823 ~r et al and 1 · 1 and .1 & 18.3 id Town rd start ion. The 1 action e the al PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.; Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 12, 1993 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under (State Environmental Quality Review ACt-SEQRA) of the Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibil agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe shou2 Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in yc Project Name: Proposed Lot Line change for Harold et al & Otto Uhl, Jr. et al SCTM #1 18.1 & 18.3. Requested Action: This proposed Lot Line change is to square feet from Harold Reese, Sr. Uht, Jr. and to convey 5,258 square Otto Uhl, Jr. to Harold Reese, Sr. SCO'Vr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York ! 197 I Fax (516) 765-1823 Article 8 invironmental below; ties of lead be evaluated. completed ur response. Reese Sr. 000-22-3-15.1, convey 10,093 Go Otto feet from after the Lot Line change the Harold Reese, Sr. parcel will be 98.1563 acres and the Otto 3hl, Jr. parcel will be 12.4051 acres. SEQRA Classification: (x) Type I ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: Melissa Spiro (516)-765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty i(30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuml status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below). Comments-. This is a Type I of CEA (Dam Pond) action in that the properties are wJ Please feel free to contact this office for furthE Sincerely, Richard G. Chairman * NYS DEC, Stony Brook ~ Board of Trustees Building Department Southold Town Board *Suffolk County Dept. NYSDEC - Albany of Health Services * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies this action. .ng lead agency thin 500' r information. Ward, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.; Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S, McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 12th Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24', Suffolk County Administl Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the follo subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commissio Map of - o~ ~*:Tc. er ~l (C¢~ ~3ec,¢~Hamlet/Locality FaSt S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: S.C. Tax Map No.: /~OC> - Major Sub. Minor Sub. MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Zoning - Site Plan C1% Preliminary Plat (3 copies)/~ Road Profiles Drainage Plans (1) Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan (1) Grading Plan (1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements See attached she CONTINUED SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 ,19~3 )r ttive Code, the ~ing proposed /g/ ster REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an (Unlisted)~e I)~ (Type II)Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes)~. 4. The proposed division has rec_9~M~_Jd approval from the S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) , Comments: We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (No) Referral received 19 by Suffolk County Planning Commiss~n and assigned File NO. Very truly yours, Richard G. Ward Chairman December 1, 1992 $outhold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Lot Line Changes Cove Beach Estat East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 22 3 - 18.1 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your cons the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivis referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavatic residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of structures are proposed. Yours truly, Harold Reese, ideration in on and its for a 1 be made existing March 1, 1993 Ms Messila Spiro Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 RE: Cove Beach Estates Dear Ms Spiro; Enclosed please find our check for $50.00 covering the ne fees to process our application on Cove Beac~ and place t on the Planning Board's April calendar for final approval Please contact me if any questions or additional informat needed. Si~n~erely yo~T~ Harold Reese Jr. President cessary he project ion is cc: Ben Kinzler HR:cc ~d.J~EN ~. YOUNG YOUNG ~ YOUNG 4O00STRa~.NDER ~VENUE RIVERHE~.D, NEW YORK n0o, March 2, 1992 ATTN: Ms. Melissa Spiro Town of Southold Planning Department Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: COVE BEACH ESTATES at East Marion, T/O Southold, (85-0888) New York Dear Ms. Spiro: Enclosed are twelve (12) prints of the Map of Lot-L Between Land of Harold Reese, Sr. et al and Land of Otto et at, last dated February 28, 1992. This map has been amended to indicate the property names in the title of the map, in accordance with your r request. We understand that you~review of this application w once you receive the amended Application Forms from the attorney. TCW/sjt Encl. cc: Mr. Harold Reese, Jr. Ben Kinzler, Esq. + 1 Print + 1 Print Very truly yours Thomas C. Wolper HOW~aRDW. YOUNG ine Change Uhl, Jr. )wners ~cent [11 continue ~pplicant's ]~EN KINZLER ATTORNEY AT LAW February 9, 19c. Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Cove Beach Estates Subdivision ADplication Gentlemen: In conjunction with the above matter, I enclose th~ duly executed documents: 1. Two applications for approval of lot line respect to two parcels to be exchanged between Harold Re al and Otto Uhl, Jr, et al. 2. Form Questionnaire dated May 8, 1992 and duly Otto Uhl, Jr. 3. Form Questionnaire dated December 2, 199; executed by Frederick Reese. 4. Short form environmental assessment form dated 1992 duly executed by applicants. 5. Letters of approval and consent to the tw changes duly executed by the following persons, all ow! affected parcels: 3 following :hanges in ~se Sr., et ~xecuted by and duly )ecember 2, lot line .ers of the a. Harold Reese, Sr. b. Harold Reese, Jr. c. Frederick Reese d. Otto Uhl, Jr. e. Russell Broach f. Frank R. Russell, Sr. g. Harold Russell h. George F. Russell. 6e drainage Duly executed letters re: no grading, no new r)ads and no from all record owners. Copy of duly executed deed dated May 8, 1992 regtrding lot Page 2 Southold Planning Board February 9, 1993 line change from Reese, et al, to Uhl, et al. (Deed is by us for recording pending final approval of the lot and subdivision application). 8. Copy of duly executed deed dated May 8, 1992 re line change from Uhl, et al. to Reese, et al. (Deed is by us for recording pending final approval of the lot and subdivision application). 9. Easement agreement dated May 8, 1992 granting al permanent easement in a portion of the Uhl p~ completion of the cul-de-sac at end of roadway ol subdivision map. 10. Proposed By-Laws for Homeowner's Association upon approval of application. We are holding the forms necessary to effect th changes (Real Property Gains Tax Affidavit and Equaliz~ all duly executed. We will undertake to file these doc% receipt of a final approval of the subdivision applicat I trust the foregoing will provide to you all necessary to schedule a final hearing on the proposed ~ applications. Of course, should you require additional documents, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your courtesies and assistance in t~ BK:df enc. being held ine change rarding lot being held ine change Reese et )perty for proposed o be filed ~ .lot line tlon form) !ments upon ion. documents ubdivision or further is matter. AIRBILL PACKAGE TRACKING NUMBER RECIPIENT'S COPY To(Re ' nt'sName) PleasePmt ~ · ~ll~AS~(~reet s s YO~ 'VTE~NAL BILLIN~ REFERENCE iN~R~TION rFC4 ~act~ .ill ~ ~ invo,~ ) '~ I~der 2U BilIReO'.`e'lsFedExAc" No 3U .......... yFedExAcct No 4D 'i'lO'~ilCafd 16 Id I'EOEX LETTER * 56~¢~J~EX 13 [] FEOEXBOX 53 [] ?EOEX¢OX 14 ~ ~¢ JEX TUBE 54 ~ FEOEX TUBE Tolal Tolal Total C Regular Slop [3 ~ Drop BOX FedEx Emp No X Date/Time r oooral EXplOsS Base C~arges Other 2 December 1, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Lot Line Changes - Cove East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 ~ - ~ - ~8.1 Gentlemen: Estates We do hereby approve and consent to the two (2) lot line proposed and set forth in the map entitled "Map of Lot L between Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Land of Otto Uhl prepared for Cove Beach Estates at East Marion, Town 0 Suffolk County, N.Y.," dated February 1, 1991 and redat 28, 1992, as prepared by Howard W. Young, licensed lan. These lot line changes are being requested in ord~ effectively and efficiently effect a subdivision of Estates. Very truly yours, HAROLD REESE, SR. Sworn to before me ~ day of Dece~ PUBLIC JEa NOTARY Quallf changes as ine Changes Jr. et al ~ Southold, Rd February ! surveyor. ~r to more Cove Beach this ~ber , 1992 N M. McDERMOTT LIBLIC, Stata of New York o. 01 MC4848629 ecl in Naaaau C~unty Expires Feb. tT, 1~ December 1, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Gentlemen: Lot Line Changes - Cove Beach East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 22 - 3 - 18.1 Estates We do hereby approve and consent to the two (2) lot lin~ proposed and set forth in the map entitled "Map of Lot 1 between Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Land of Otto Uhl prepared for Cove Beach Estates at East Marion, Town o Suffolk County, N.Y.," dated February 1, 1991 and redat 28, 1992, as prepared by Howard W. Young, licensed lan These lot line changes are being requested in ord~ effectively and efficiently effect a subdivision of Estates. HAROLD REESE, JR. ~' Sworn to before me ~ day of Dece NO ~ BEN ZION changes as ine Changes Jr. et al Southold, md February surveyor. to more Cove Beach this ~ber , 1992 December 1, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Gentlemen: Lot Line Changes - Cove Beach East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 22 - 3 - 18.1 We do hereby approve and consent to the two (2) lot line proposed and set forth in the map entitled "Map of Lot L between Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Land of Otto Uhl prepared for Cove Beach Estates at East Marion, Town o Suffolk County, N.Y.," dated February 1, 1991 and redat 28, 1992, as prepared by Howard W. Young, licensed lan. Estates These lot line changes are being requested in ord~ effectively and efficiently effect a subdivision Estates. Very/~ruly y,Q~rs, ~ FREDERICK REESE Sworn to before me ~ of Dece: day lIEN ZION KINZl Notary Public. State of No. 30-21266! 0ual~fied in Nas~u changes as ine Changes Jr. et al Southold, ~d February surveyor. ir to more of Cove Beach this ~ber , 1992 May 8, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Gentlemen: Lot Line Changes - Cove Beac! East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 15.1 22 3 18.3 22 3 18.1 Estates We do hereby approve and consent to the two (2) lot line proposed and set forth in the map entitled "Map of Lot ! between Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Land of Otto Uhl prepared for Cove Beach Estates at East Marion, Town c Suffolk County, N.Y.," dated February l, 1991 and redat 28, 1992, as prepared by Howard W. Young, licensed lan These !o~ia~ changes are effec~ely and efficiently Es~Ytes. being requested in ord effect a subdivision of Sworn to before 8th day of May, NOTARY PUBLIC DEBORAH B. KAl I~ry Publk:, State of I No. 24-47EOa,9~ Qualified in Kings G Comml~on Expires Apri changes as ins Changes Jr. et al Southold, ed February surveyor. r to more Cove Beach s this 992 IN lew York 30, I~ May 8, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Gentlemen: Lot Line Changes - Cove Beach East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 ~ 15.1 22 - 3 18.3 22 - 3 - 18.1 Estates We do hereby approve and consent to the two (2) lot line proposed and set forth in the map entitled "Map of Lot I between Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Land of Otto Uhl prepared for Cove Beach Estates at East Marion, Town c Suffolk County, N.Y.," dated February 1, 1991 and redat 28, 1992, as prepared by Howard W. Young, licensed lan These lot line changes are being requested in ord effectively and efficiently effect a subdivision of Estates. Very truly yours, ~-RbS~ELL %f.~ BROACH Sworn to before m il day of ~1 NOTARY PUBLI~ !OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAl HELEN RENDA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE O1: FL COMML~ION NO. CC167~ MY COMMISSION ~X?. IAN, 2 changes as ine Changes , Jr. et al f Southold, ed February surveyor. to more Cove Beach this 1992 May 8, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall ..... Southold, New York 11791 Re: Lot Line Changes - Cove Beach East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 22 - 3 - 18.1 Gentlemen: We do hereby approve and consent to the two (2) lot line proposed and set forth in the map entitled "Map of Lot L between Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Land of Otto Uhl prepared for Cove Beach Estates at East Marion, Town o Suffolk County, N.Y.," dated February 1, 1991 and redat 28, 1992, as prepared by Howard W. Young, licensed lan These lot line changes are being requested in ord~ effectively and efficiently effect a subdivision of Estates. Very truly yours, Sworn to before me ~ day o f/t~ ~ NOTARY PUBLIC DEBORAF No. 24-4 Qullifled in ~ Cemm~ Expir Estates B. KAHN ~te of New York ingl County ~,~ m A~'i130, 1~,~ this , 1992 changes as ine Changes Jr. et al ~ Southold, ~d February ! surveyor. ir to more Cove Beach May 8, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Lot Line Changes - Cove Beach East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 22 - 3 - 18.1 Gentlemen: We do hereby approve and consent to the two (2) lot line proposed and set forth in the map entitled "Map of Lot I between Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Land of Otto Uhl prepared for Cove Beach Estates at East Marion, Town o Suffolk County, N.Y.," dated February 1, 1991 and redat 28, 1992, as prepared by Howard W. Young, licensed lan These lot line changes are being requested in ord effectively and efficiently effect a subdivision of Estates. Ver.~ruly yo~ HAROLD E~-~ Estates changes as ine Changes Jr. et al Southold, ed February surveyor. to more Cove Beach Swor~ to before mel this f ~ day of'~, 1992 .... ~-¢¢NOTARY PUBLIC I May 8, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11791 Re: Gentlemen: Lot Line Changes - Cove Beach East Marion, N.Y. 1000 - 22 - 3 - 15.1 22 - 3 - 18.3 22 - 3 - 18.1 Estates We do hereby approve and consent to the two (2) lot line proposed and set forth in the map entitled "Map of Lot I between Harold Reese, Sr., et al and Land of Otto Uhl prepared for Cove Beach Estates at East Marion, Town o Suffolk County, N.Y.," dated February 1, 1991 and redat 28, 1992, as prepared by Howard W. Young, licensed lan These lot line changes are being requested in ord. effectively and efficiently effect a subdivision of Estates. Ver~ly yours!~ ~ORGE ~. RUSSEL Swor~.to before me day of~. changes as ine Changes Jr. et al Southold, ed February surveyor. to more Cove Beach this · 1992 ,!G BOARD MEMBERS ,t Orlowski, Jr., Chairman eorge Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 4, 1992 Ben Kinzler 147 Willis Avenue Mineola, New York 11501 RE: Lot Line Change Harold Reese, Sr Otto Uhl, Jr. et SCTM# 1000-22-3- 1000-22-3- Dear Mr. Kinzler: The Planning Board is in receipt of the twelve ( for the above mentioned Lot Line Change that were sen Wolpert of Young & Young. Please note that the maps w processed until such time that a formal application application fee for such action are submitted. Please contact this office if you have any ques regarding the above, or if you require another copy o Line Change application packet. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr Chairman SCO'I-F L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 for · et al and al 15.1 and 18.1 & 18.3 12) maps t by Thomas ill not be the Lot SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: ~ \~ ~_ suBJECT: Oo~_ '-~¢¼ L~e SCTM~: COMMENTS: LASER FICHE FORM SUBDIVISIONS Proiect Type: Lot Line Changes Status: Expired SCTM #: 1000- 22.-3-15.1 Proiect Name: Cove Beach Estates LL 1993 SCANNED OCT -2 ~ Records Management Location: north side of NYS Route 25, 1,776 ft. east of Stars Road in East Marion Hamlet: East Marion Applicant Name: Harold Reese, Sr. & Otto Uhl, Jr. et al Owner Name: Harold Reese, Sr. Zone 1: Approval Date: ,A/~,7' PLAT Signed Date: OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information Zone 2: C and R's · Homeowners Association · R and M Agreement: Address: County Filing Date: Zone 3: SCAN Date: LOCATION MAP SCALE I"= 600' T ? ~ ,-.?-' / X'-' :' ,- . ~, ,, ., , , ] //,/i ~ ,~1 ~ , ~ /~ ~FrederickReese Areo=5Z58s.f. PROPERTY LINE / ~o~ ~ / ~ R; ~000: / / p farine- / / / Parcel To Be Conveyed To ~ Ea/se m~nt Otto Uhl, Jr, Russell V. B~och, -- .-~/" ' ...... ' / /' I George F. Russel, Harold E. Russel, ~ " / i Frank R. Russel,SE now -- .~ // ~ Area = 1009$e.f. o~ f°rmer/~~ ~ ~ ~ Harold .. / ~ ttl former,, / ' Jr now or formed Russell V 8~ Cathed-ine ~Sroach now or formeHy Frank R Russel , Sr. Otto ~bl , Jr & Others ........ Area After Lol :Line Ch~e' = 15 ~745 Acres now or formerly Margaret Guima pOND DAM ~.00 ..c Dorothy E Harold ~ Reese , Sr.,, 8~ Others ,. /Area: 98 2673 Acres I .... '- Area After Lo~:-D]ne Cho'gge = 98.1565 Acres I '- .. ....... ~o , ~ /// ~ ¢ ~ --- . .------- ~ .~. / ~ x . now or formerly Dorothy E Cook John ~ Luz ~aroudokms Cook ~ ~ x '-~ -~--~--~-~ ~ Z now or formerly Frank R Russel 8, S25'30'~6'E 242.90' Others now or formerly Ronald Edeen, Jn ~ Barbara Edeen now or formerly Frank E Begora,dr 8~ Iris R. Begora now or formerly Myron B Brown MAP OF LOT-LINE CHANGE BETWEEN LAND OF HAROLD REESE,SR. et al AND LAND OF OTTO UHL, JR. B~ al PREPARED FOR COVE BEACH ESTATES AT EAST MARION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NOTE: SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST. IOOOSECT. 22 BLK. ;5 LOT 15.1~181~183 TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON IS FROM "TOPOGRAPHIC MAP- FIVE EASTERN TOWNS"PREPARED POR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. OWNERS: I000- ZZ - 5 - IB.I o'Fro UHL~ JR., RUSSELLV. BROACH~ GEORGE F. RUSSEL= HAROLD E. RUSSEL e FRANK R. RUSGEL~ SR 9 DERBY ROAD PORT WAGHINGTON~ NY. 11050 SUFFOLK MAY B8,1993 FEB 28,1992 DATE: FEB. I, 1991 SCALE: l' = I00' NO. 85 - 0888 COUNTY,__._ N.Y~~