Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-101.-2-24.5
BUILDING NOTES: BULLRING OCCUPANCY: TYPE C4 - STORAGE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION: TYPE 5 - WOOD FRAME TOILET FACILITIES AVAIKABLE IN ADJACENT BUILDINGS ACCORDING TO STATE OF NEW YORK CODE 900.2 (5) SITE PLAN NOTES: SITE PLAN MAP INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY DONE BY PECONIC SURVEYORS, PC P.O. BOX 909, 1230 TRAVELER STREET, SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 (651) 765 5020. NYS LIC NO. 49618 SITE PLAN SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. SCTMN 1000-101-02-24.5 CONTOUR LINES AND ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO THE FIVE EASTERN TOWNS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS. FORMER S.C.D.H.S. RED NO. R10-97-0106. SURVEY CERTIFIED TO EBERBARD MULLER AND PAULETTE SATUR MULLER WEBSTER BANK COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY RH 91 0159. ORIGINAL SURVEY DATED FEBRUARY 27, 1997. FINAL SURVEY DATED MAY 21,1998. SITE DATA: S.C.T.M.N.: DISTRICT: 1000 SECTION: 101 BLOCK: 002 LOT: 24.5 CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: LOT ZONE AC ZONE, AGRICULTURAL LOT AREA 80,005.85 S.F. LOT IN ACRES: 1.857 ACRES EXISTING BUILDING AREAS EXISTING RESIDENCE 1,460.00 S.F. EXISTING BARN 1,670.00 S.F. EXISTING SHED 1 512.00 S.F. EXISTING SHED 2 855.00 S.F. EXISTING SHEB 5 201.00 S.F. EXISTING SHED 4 90.00 S.F. TOTAL SITE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING 4,788.00 S.F. PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS AND CONSERVATION PROPOSED BARN AREA 4,100.00 S.F. PROPOSED ROOFED CANOPY TRUCK STORAGE AREA 1,105 S.F. TOTAL PROPOSED NEW BUILDING AREA 5,205.00 S.F. TOTAL SITE BUILDING AREAS PROPOSED 9,995.00 S.F. LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED EXISTING PROPOSED 20% MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED 5.98% LOT COVERAGE EXISTING 12.49% PROPOSED RO0 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ROOF AREA: 5,205 S.F. 5,205 S.F. X .17 X 1 = 885 CUBIC FEET RAINFALL 8'-0" DIAMETER LEACHING RING - 42.3 C.F./FT 21 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRED (4) 8' DIAMETER LEACHING POOLS 6'-0" DEEP REQUIRED BUILDING SET BACK \ \ \ ./ FORMERLY N/O/F BROSCOSKI & O~ERS & COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED ROOFED CAN OP.~/' TRACTOR (2)/AND WASTE RECEPT.AC/LE' STORAGE ARE.A/ LINE / FORMERLY N/O/F DROSCOSKI & OTHERS & CDUNTY OF SUFFOLK (~ SITE PLAN 8'-0" DIAMETER LEACHING ROOF DRAIN 6'-0" DEEP, TYP. MIN. 50' FROM ~ ~- WELLS. _ j_~'~ -- EXIST. WELL -J~--' PROPERTY OF MULLER / SATUR TAX PARCEL SCTMN 1000-101-02-24.5 LOT AREA=BO,O05,S5 S,F. (1.B37 ACRES) OF THE MULLER / SATUR PROPERTY EXISTING BARN (1,670 S.F.) TERRA [XISTING ICULTURAL WELL EXIST SEPTIC. >N~ FORMERLY BONNOSKI ,APPP, OV. D'By , ,',.., TOWN h ~- ' ' C,,. N/O/F LAND OF EXISTING DIRT -- EXISTING SHED 2 (855 S.F.), EXISTING (201 S.F.).,~/ SHED 4 S.F.) SOUTH~ Southold Town 1" = 20' REVISION/ISSUE DESCRIPTION DATE ISSUED TO DRAWN BY SATUR FARMS //1 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1 FEBRUARY 02 CLIENT RG ~ G AND b ARCHITECTS 2802 O AND L ARCHITECTS #2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 6 MARCH 02 CLIENT All rlGhta reaerved. Tie GLove drawings, dealgna, end 3705 ALVAH'S LANE ¢3 ARC REVIEW 28 MARCH 02 CLIENT Archlt.cte ~nd shGII oot be copTed, reproduced, dTscloeed CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 ~4 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 10 APRIL 02 CLIENT CHECKED aY t. oth.~., o~ ...~ ,n ,..,.:U.. ~th ..~ .o~ ~t,.~ TELEPHONE 212.962.1292 RO prepared. ,~ .,Gl. o~ ,, ,~t..~t,o,t ~,. ,N.~ .mt., FACSIMILE 212.962.1293 PROPOSED BARN SITE PLAN AS NOTED FEBRUARY 1, 2002 PLANNLNG BOARD MEMBEI~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1.938 Fax (631) 765-3136 June 11,2002 Ms. Paulette Satur cio Satur Farms 3705 Alvah's Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Satur Farms Located at 3705 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-101-2-24.5 Zone: A-C Dear Ms. Satur: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 10, 2002: The final public hearing was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Pauline Satur and Eberhard Mueller are the owners of the property known and designated as Satur Farms, located at 3705 AIvah's Lane in Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, this site plan is for a barn and covered equipment area; and WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by the Building Department on June 10, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Town Engineer has reviewed the drainage calculations and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on May 13, 2002; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said Satur Farms application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on May 13, 2002; and Satur Farms - Paqe Two - June 11,2002 WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the surveys, dated February 1,2002 and last revised April 10, 2002, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to a one year review from date of building permit. Enclosed please find two copies of the approved site plan; one for your records and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your building permit. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman encl. cc: Building Department Tax Assessors PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 53095 STATE ROUTE 25 P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971-0959 012H1620'~-?0 $00.4- US POSTAGE Pat &Jim McNamara 4000 Alvahs Lane Cutchogue, N '~ h.lh,,llhh,h,,h,,ltlh.hh.hhl,h,h,,Ihh,,.hll PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND September 25, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 F~x: 631 765-3136 Pat &Jim McNamara 4000 Alvahs Lane Cutchogue, New York ! 1935 Re: Satur Farms Dear Mr. & Mrs. McNamara: The Planning Board, at their work session on Monday, September 17, 2007, reviewed your letter dated September 4, 2007 regarding the above reference site. The Planning Board thanks you for your comments and will take them into consideration. Currently, the Southold Town Building Department is reviewing an application for a proposed glass greenhouse located in the north west comer of SCTM #: 1000-101-2-24.6. As per Town Code $280-130, the Building Department will make a written "determination as to whether or not a site plan or an amendment thereto is required... '. In addition, the Suffolk County Farmland Committee reviewed this request at their meeting on September 19, 2007. Manyof the concems listed in your letter are kerns which can be' addressed bythe Planning Board through the site plan process should the Building Department determine ske plan approval is necessary. In addition, please find enclosed a copy of the right to farm legislation, which may offer some assistance regarding your concems. Thank you again for the information submitted in your letters. Please contact tiffs office at 631.765.1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.xrL should you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, house Chairperson Enc: Right to farm legislation File Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L~ EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND September 25, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Joan Lademann P.O. Box 123 Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: Satur Farms Dear Ms. Lademann: The Planning Board, at their work session on Monday, September 17, 2007, reviewed your letter dated September 4, 2007 regarding the above reference site. The Planning Board thanks you for your comments and will take them into consideration. Currently, the Southold Town Building Department is reviewing an application for a proposed glass greenhouse located in the north west comer of SCTM #: 1000-101-2-24.6. As per Town Code $280-130, the Building Department will make a written "determination as to whether or not a site plan or an amendment thereto is required... ". In addition, the Suffolk CotmtyFarmland Committee reviewed this request at their meeting on September 19, 2007. Many of the concerns listed in your letter are items which can be addressed bythe Planning Board through the site plan process should the Building Department determine site plan approval is necessary. In addition, please find enclosed a copy of the fight to farm legislation, which may offer some assistance regarding your concerns. Thank you again for the information submitted in your letters. Please contact this office at 631.765.1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. should you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, dhouse Chairperson Enc: Right to farm legislation File Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND September 25, 2007 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Libby Tarleton 3850 Alvahs Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: Satur Farms Dear Ms. Tarleton: The Planning Board, at their work session on Monday, September 17, 2007, reviewed your letter dated September 4, 2007 regarding the above reference site. The Planning Board thanks you for your comments and wi~ take them into consideration. Currently, the Southold Town Building Department is reviewing an application for a proposed glass greenhouse located in the north west comer of SCTM #: 1000-101-2-24.6. As per Town Code $280-130, the Building Department will make a written "determination as to whether or not a site plan or an amendment thereto is required... ". In addition, the Suffolk County Farmland Committee reviewed this request at their meeting on September 19, 2007. Many of the concerns listed in your letter are items which can be addressed bythe Planning Board through the ske plan process should the Building Department determine site plan approval is necessary. In addition, please find enclosed a copy of the right to farm legislation, which may offer some assistance regarding }~ur concerns. Thank you again for the information submitted in your letters. Please contact this office at 631.765.1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. should you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, B. Woodhouse ' Chah~person Enc: Right to farm legislation File Scott Russell, Southold Town Supervisor Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector Town pf Southold PC/Codebook.fbr W~'ndows § 280-97. Right to farm. The Town Board of the Town of Southold finds that fanning is an essential activity within the Town of Southold. Farmers provide fresh food, clean air, economic diversity and aesthetic open spaces to all the citizens of our Town. In addition, land in agricultural uses requires less tax dollars for services than does land with residential or commercial development. Accordingly, farmers shall have the right to farm in Southold without undue interference from adjacent landowners or users. For the purpose of reducing future conflicts between people residing on tracts adjacent to farmlands and farmers, it is necessary to establish and give notice of the nature of the farming activities to future neighbors of farmland and farming activities. Agricultural activities conducted on farmland, undertaken in compliance with applicable federal, state, county and Town laws, roles and regulations, are presumed to be good agricultural practices and presumed not to adversely affect the public health safety and welfhre. We find that whatever nuisance may be caused to others by such uses and activities, so conducted, is more than offset by the benefits from farming to the community. Therefore, all such activities shall be protected farm practices within the Town of Southold. § 280-98. Definitions. When used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: CROPS, LIVESTOCK AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS -- include but are not limited to the following: A. Field crops, including corn, wheat, oats, rye, barley, hay, potatoes and dry beans. B. Fruits, including apples, peaches, grapes, cherries and berries. C. Vegetables, including tomatoes, snap beans, cauliflower, pumpkins, cabbage, carrots, beets and onions. D. Horticultural specialties, including nursery stock, ornamental shrubs, ornamental trees and flowers. E. Livestock and livestock products, including cattle, sheep, hogs, goats, horses, poultry, fur bearing animals, milk, eggs and furs. F. Maple syrup. G. Christmas trees derived from a managed Christmas tree operation whether dug for 1 Town of Southold PC/Codebook.fbr Windows transplanting or cut from the stump. H. Farm woodland, meaning land used for the production for sale of woodland products, including but not limited to logs, lumber, posts and firewood. I. Horse boarding operations. J. Bees/honey. § 280-99. Right to undertake protected farm practices. A. Farmers shall have the tight to undertake protected farm practices in the active pursuit of agricultural operations, including, but not limited to: clearing; grading; plowing; aerial and ground spraying; the use of legal agricultural chemicals (including herbicides, pesticides and lc~ tilizers); raising horses, poultry, small livestock and cattle; processing and marketing produce; installing water and soil conservation facilities; utilizing farm crop protection devices; designing and constructing and using farm structures, including barns, stables, paddocks, fences, greenhouses and pump houses; using water; pumping; spraying; pruning and harvesting; disposing of organic wastes on the farm; extensive use of farm laborers; training and others in the use and care of farm equipment, animals; traveling local roads in properly marked vehicles; and providing local farm produce markets near farming areas. B. These activities can and do generate dust, smoke, noise, vibration and odor. These activities may occur on holidays, Sundays and weekends, at night and in the day. Such activities are presumed to be reasonable. Such activities do not constitute a nuisance unless the activity has a substantial adverse effect on the public health, safety and welfare. § 280-100. Right to notice provided by Town agencies. A. The Town Planning Board, the Town Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals shall require, as part of any approval of any development immediately adjacent to or within 500 feet of any parcel of at least five acres in size, which, at the time of such approval, is in active agricultural use, that a notice of protected farm practices be given to all purchasers of such developed property. B. The notice of protected farm practices shall be included in permanent covenants and restrictions which shall run with the land on each parcel when such parcel is subdivided or developed. C. If, in any development, it is the intent to make the common or green space available for agriculture, the notice of protected farm practices shall be included in permanent covenants 2 and restrictions. Town p['Southold PC/Codebook./br ~'ndows § 280-101. Right to notice by brokers and agents. All persons dealing in real estate in the Town of Southold as brokers, reprcsentatives or agents of the owners, of any parcel of land adjacent to any parcel of land of at least five acres in size currently in agricultural use shall provide to every purchaser or such parcel an original and one copy of the notice of protected farm practices at the time of a potential purchaser's consideration and inspection of the parcel. The person dealing in real estate shall have such purchaser sign and date the duplicate copy of the notice. The notice of protected farm practices form shall be available to all persons required to provide such notices free of charge from the Town Clerk's office. § 280-102. Enforcement. Failure to comply with any provision of this chapter shall constitute a violation. § 280-103. Severability. If any part or provision of this article or the application thereof to any person, entity or circumstances shall be adjudged invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall be confined in its operation and enforcement to the part of or such provision of or application directly involved in the controversy in which such .judgment shall have been rendered and shall not affect or impair the validity of the remainder of this article or the application thereof' to other persons, entities or circumstances. 3 34 · Ti~e Suffolk Times · September 20, 2007 MINI OF THE HAMPTONS 749 County Road 39A MINlUSA COM Southampton NY 11968-5239 (888) 874-1199 Noise plaint goes nowhere Right to farm trumps quiet By Eileen Duffy Diesel fumes, irrigation pumps run- Ifing m the middle of the night and idlmg tracks are not what some people expect when they buy a home on the North Fork. but ff they're looking to live near a farm they'd better be prepared to accept the day to-day reality' of runnmg an agricultural operation "There's a right to farm in this town." said board member Map tin Sidor at the Planning TOWN Board's work session on Monday. "Ami we're going to get more intense with at the core it's a farming comrmmit3,; and they can expect dust and tractor noise." The three letters to the Plannin~ Board specifically objected to trucks' being parked on the road. Sa tur farms, however, has applications m to build a barn witha loading dock and a permanent greenhouse on the north- east side of the farm, said Paulette Sa- tut. "That would get the tracks off thc street and remove the temporary, hoop houses near the street," she said by phone. PLANNING Her husband and busi- [~OA~D ness partner, Eberhard MQller, said when they tile goat cheese, the agr/t- --' ainment, and now the governor signed Utto law that farms can distill their own alcohol. I don't know ff the town has any idea of where agriculture is going to sustain Jtse[C' The Planning Board was discussing three letters it received lately complain mg about the noise trom refrigerated trailers and a refrigerated ruck~parked on the street m front of gatur Farms on Alvah's Lane in Cutchogue. Mr. Sidor, a farmer, was refeiTmg to chapter 308 of the New York State ag ficulture and markets law. Farms in des- ignated agricultural zones are also pro [ected by count~' and town laxrs. This righ~ to farm protects farmers from complaints about dust ~om trac- tors to the use of air cam/ohs to scare birds from crops. bought the land they had no idea the5' would start a farm, let alone see the business grow so fast. "I hate those traflers, I hate them with a passion as much as anyone else," he said. ".And there's a huge conmaotinn out here in the suramer, there's no doubt the people in New York City. Whe:-e arc people going to get their ~ood if they Mr. Md[let added that with the E. coil outbreaks in Callforrda and the gradual shift of consumer preference for Iocalh Long Island," he said. lette~writers acknowledging receipt Legally real estate brokers are re and incfadmg a copv of the fight-to quired to inform prospective home buv~ farm Iegislatinn. ' ~s~bn~ the ngl~t to, f ,ar~, ~ald E',ans There's a town upstate that has on · ne managing oroKer m Pruden- ts s n when ou enter 'Vd nal~Douglas Elliman's Southold office. [na~ of ow4, this isa rig~IC~)o~ear~ "mey usually sign ,off pretty willing- town '" said Mr. S dot "We should do ly," he said bv phone.' They understand that here." [Got Fleece,.? l Suffo County Farmland Com ttee c/o Suffolk County Planning Department H. Lee Dennison Building - 4th floor, Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 (631 } 853-511 ! [voice] (631 ) 853-4044 [fax] 853-4044 chairman Bennett Orlowski members Bennett Orlowski Russell Barnett Ronald Bush Nate Corwin Lee Foster Daniel Fricke Olney M. Gardiner Thomas isles Alfred Kilb, Jr. Joseph Krukowski Dale D. Moyer Eugene J. Murphy Jeffrey Roltkamp Charles $cheer Albert Schmitt Mark Zaweski NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Farmland Committee Members & Other Interested Persons There will be a Farmland Committee meeting on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 at the L.L Horticulture Research & Extension Center, 3059 Sonnd Avenue, Riverhead, NY 11901 at 6:00 PM. l. Call to order by Chairman Bennett Orlowski 2. Woelffer: Wine storage in existing building or new building for equipment storage 908-2-2-14 3. Tom McOunnigle - Permission to expand a house 1000-74-1-37.3 4. Discussion on greenhouses 5. Steve Meznieski-Permission to rebuild a house on the former Zimmer property 1000-19-1-18.3 6. Paulette Satur, greenhouses & refrigerated building 7. New parcels to be added to the waiting list 8. Meeting Open for Public Conmnents 9. Other Business counsel Jennifer B. Kohn advisors Joseph Gergela, Ill William Sanok Next meeting: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 at 6:00 P.M. at the L.I. Horticulture Research Extension Center, 3059 Sound Avenue, Riverhead, NY staff Roy Fedelem Claire J. Chorny O[PI OF LAND PRESERVATION SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-1823 Telephone (631) 765-1889 September 13, 2007 OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Libby Tarleton 3850 Alvahs Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Ms. Tarleton: I am in receipt of your recent letter detailing your frustration with Satur Farms. The issue is before the Planning Board at this time. They are gathering information and will discuss it at their meeting on Monday night. Please feel free to contact them at 765-1938. Sincemly~, Supervisor /rbw cc: Planning Board September 4, 2007 Southold Town Board PO Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold NY 11971 Dear Supervisor Russell & Town Board Members; I am writing this letter in regards to the activities occurring at 3705 Alvahs Lane also known as Satur Farm. I have been residing at 3850 Alvahs Lane for five years and in that time Satur Farm has increased the size of their farm operation to the extent that it has begun spilling over onto the road in front of my house in many ways. They have pumhased a high-low in order to bring boxes of produce from their refrigerated barn to the refrigeration trucks. Not only does it run up and down the road numerous times throughout the day, they have begun honking the horn every time they run it. Another aspect that has changed is the amount of refrigerated trucks that park in front of the house waiting to be told where to go which can last up to an hour. Because these trucks run on diesel they cannot turn them off so we are subjected to continuous noise. They also park their own refrigeration trucks in their driveway and leave them plugged in until approximately 3am when the drivers pick them up for deliveries. Due to the nature of their business they have numerous tractor trailers pulling into their loading area to pick up produce as well as drop off supplies, there can be up to three tractor trailers lined up in from of my house in one day. I realize that they are trying to make money in a business that can be very fleeting and I sympathize. My boyfriend owns his own organic fanning operation and I realize that the more quantity you can produce the more money you can make. My problem is that the totality of their operation is located on the road. They own a large piece of property behind their house that if they chose to they could relocate the refrigerated tractor trailers to the back as well as the vehicles that needed to run throughout the night. There are no houses located back there so it would not be trading one persons comfort for another's, there are only grapevines and more farm fields. The quality of life has diminished since their operation has increased in size due to the noise, dust and traffic that goes on seven days a week. I consistently have people drop by and comment on the amount of noise and ask "does that run all of the time?" I can no longer open the windows in the front of my house because of all of the dust and many times have turned on a fan or a radio to block out the noise from the trucks or from the rattling of my own windows due to the vibrations. If there is anything you can do to alleviate some or all of these problems it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time. Libby Tarleton 3850 Alvahs Lane Cutchogue NY 11935 P.O.~ox 123 Cutchogue, NY4 1935 "~'~ ~7~ Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Att: Ms. G. Woodhouse 2007 Southcld Ti>wn Dear Ms. Woodhouse and Members of the Board: After reading about the famous multi-million dollar succ~5_s~ry of Satur .Farms in a ~.~ recent ~ssue of Newsday, I find ~t necessary to voice ~oncems regarding h~a~W~z'~' safety issues created by daily activity at Satur Farms. I own the house across the street from their loading area. My conscience does not allow me to rent this house to anyone as there is so much dust blowing over as they drive in and out of their dirt driveway loading and unloading produce in and out of their six refrigerated trailers which are directly across from my house. The fumes from those refrigeration units running all day are very unhealthy. Windows cannot be open because of the dust and fumes. Also, tracks are loaded the night before for morning delivery, and they run all night long keeping the produce cold. This also creates noise in the neighbor- hood, making it difficult to sleep. Tractor-trailers are constantly lined up on the road waiting to be loaded. This blocks the view for traffic coming or going on Alvah's Lane, plus the fact there are times that it is difficult to get out of the driveways in the neighborhood. Also they have a fork lift carting boxes of produce along Alvah's Lane from their barn to the refrigerated trailers - another hazard on the road as there are many times that boxes are loaded so high, making it difficult for the driver to see. My neighbors, Pat & Jim McNamara, have forwarded to the supervisor many photos of the dangers on the road due to all this farm traffic. I am also noticing more and more tire tracks on my front lawn caused by trucks going in and out of Satur Farms driveway as they have very little space in which to maneuver. In fact, one day as my husband John and I were standing in my front yard and looking at the ruts caused by the above mentioned trucks, Eberhard Muller (Paulette Samr's husband) came running across to inform us that his trucks caused the ruts and that it was o.k. When I stated that this was always a farming community and everyone had always respected one another's property and never rode on anyone's lawn, he said that we were nothing but a bunch of f---ing morons. That's the type of person he is - no respect for anyone. I come from a farming family, having worked many years on my grandparents' farm in this exact area, (plus I now have a son-in-law who farms) so I wholeheartedly support farming, but I am requesting that steps be taken to avoid the dust, the pollution, the noise, and the road safety. The neighborhood has become very unhealthy and dangerous. Sincerely, Joan Lademann cc: Mr. Scott Russell, Supervisor September 4, 2007 Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold NY 11971 Dear Chairperson Woodhouse & Planning Board Members; 8[? - 6 2007 I am writing this letter in regards to the acuvttles occurnng at known as Satur Farm. I have been residing at 3850 Alvahs Lane for five years and in that time Satur Farm has increased the size of their farm operation to the extent that it has begun spilling over onto the road in front of my house in many ways. They have purchased a high-low in order to bring boxes of produce from their refrigerated ham to the refrigeration trucks. Not only does it run up and down the road numerous times throughout the day, they have begun honking the horn every time they run it. Another aspect that has changed is the amount of refrigerated trucks that park in front of the house waiting to be told where to go which can last up to an hour. Because these trucks run on diesel they cannot turn them off so we are subjected to continuous noise. They also park their own refrigeration trucks in their driveway and leave them plugged in until approximately 3am when the driver picks it up for deliveries. Due to the nature of their business they have numerous tractor trailers pulling into their loading area to pick up produce as well as drop off supplies, there can be up to three tractor trailers lined up in front of my house in one day. I realize that they are trying to make money in a business that can be very fleeting and I sympathize. My boyfriend owns his own organic farming operation and I realize that the more quantity you can produce the more money you can make. My problem is that the totality of their operation is located on the road. They own a large piece of property behind their house that if they chose to they could relocate the refrigerated tractor trailers to the back as well as the vehicles that needed to rrm throughout the night. There are no houses located back there so it would not be trading one persons comfort for another's, there are only grapevines and more farm fields. The quality of life has diminished since their operation has increased in size due to the noise, dust and traffic that goes on seven days a week. I consistently have people drop by and comment on the amount of noise and ask "does that run all of the time?" I can no longer open the windows in the front of my house because of all of the dust and many times have tumed on a fan or a radio to block out the noise from the trucks or from the rattling of my own windows due to the vibrations. If there is anything you can do to alleviate some or all of these problems it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time. Libby TarIeton 3850 Alvahs Lane Cutchogue NY 11935 August 21, 2007 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold NY 11971 Dear Chairperson Woodhouse & Planning Board Members; This letter is in regards to the site planning meeting which will be coming up in the near future for Satur Farm LLC located at 3705 Alvahs Lane Cutchogue NY. I have enclosed pictures that I hope you will take into consideration when making your decisions. These pictures show numerous tractor trailers and box trucks loading and parking along Alvahs Lane. This is a major concem for those of us entering and exiting our driveways along this road as well as for traffic flow along Alvahs Lane. I have also enclosed correspondence through the years that you may find of interest. I would also like noted that for the last three years there have been no crops grown on their land located to the west of Alvahs Lane except for a patch of asparagus behind the residence. We would like the committee to know that we are not newcomers to the area. Our family has occupied this home on Alvahs Lane for the past 36 years. Be assured that we are 100% in favor of farming as this land has always been farmed since we have been hem and before. Our concern is that them are currently 6 refrigerated trailers running non-stop 24-7 directly in front of our house. Imagine not being able to open your windows because of the horrible noise and diesel fumes as well as continuous dust storms coming offthe driveway. Here we am senior citizens and we can't enjoy the outdoors. There am times one can't even eat a meal outdoors because of the dust. How much are we to endure? Because of all of this (and which has been documented by our doctor) we are on anxiety medications. Our lives have been drastically changed because of this situation. Site planning is required because of the change in intensity of use which affects the characteristics of the site in terms of parking, loading access, open space and utilities. We sincerely hope you care enough to do a site plan soon, as this has been going on for five years. Rincemlv ,/P~ ~ Jim McNamara (.,,~_ 00_ Alvahs Lane Cutchogue NY 11935 c/c J & J Lademann J & K Lademann L. Tarleton N. Todd SEP -6 2007 l MaRer of PauleRe Satur Mueller v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold (20... Matter of Mueller v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of Southold 2004 NYSlipOp 06648 Decided on Septernber 20, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. Page 1 of 4 Decided on September 20, 2004 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DMSION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARMENT MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P. SONDRA MILLER GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN BARRY A. COZIER, J$. DECISION & ORDER 2002-11053 [*l]In the Matter of Paulette Satur Mueller, petitioner- respondent, Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, appellant, et al., respondents. (Index No. 16967/01) Smith, Finkelstein, Lundberg, Isler & Yakaboski, LLP, Riverhead, N.Y. (Frank A. Isler of counsel), for appellant. Wickham, Bressler, Gordon & Geasa, P.C., Melville, N.Y. (Eric J. Bressler of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold dated June 7, 2001, which, after a hearing, annulled the Town Building Inspector's decision to grant the petitioner a building permit, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold appeals from a judgment of the Supreme http://www, courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2004/2004_O6648.htm 9/22/2004 Matter ofPaulette Satur Mueller v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of So,old (20... Page 2 of 4 Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), dated July I, 2002, which granted the petition, annulled the determination, and reinstated the building permit. ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, the proceeding is dismissed, and the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold is reinstated. In 1997 the petitioner, Paulette Satur Mueller, and her husband, Eberhard Mueller, purchased an 18-acre farm on Alvah's Lane in the Town of Southold. Mr. Mueller is a celebrated chef, and the Muellers grow organic speciality produce on their farm, both for their own use and for sale to a number of Manhattan and Long Island restaurants. Prior to the Muellers"purchase of the farm, the County of Suffolk acquired development rights to most of the property as part of its Farmland Development Rights Program. In April 1998 Mrs. Mueller wrote to the Suffolk County Farmland Committee (hereinafter the [*2]Farmland Committee) to request permission to build a greenhouse, which would extend the growing season of certain produce. In her letter, Mrs. Mueller indicated that she and her husband planned to locate the greenhouse at either the northwest or southeast end of the property, and represented that it would not be obtrusive at those sites. They intended the greenhouse to remain in place for the three-year lifespan of the materials of which it was to be constructed. At a meeting later that month, the Farmland Committee approved the construction of a temporary greenhouse at the northwestern location, "subject to local requirements." Thereafter, without obtaining a building permit, the Muellers constructed two temporary greenhouses on the northeastern portion of their farm, approximately 70 feet from the front property line. The greenhouses each measure 30 feet by 96 feet, and total approximately 6000 square feet. When the construction came to the Town% attention, the Town Building Inspector informed Mrs. Mueller that a building permit was required for the greenhouses. Mrs. Mueller then applied for and obtained a building permit ['or the structures. Patricia McNamara and James McNamara, who reside across the street from the Vlueller farm, appealed the decision to issue the building permit to the Town's Zoning Board Appeals (hereinafter the Zoning Board). In support of their appeal, the McNamaras trgued that the Building Inspector erred in issuing the building permit without first requiring ~ttp://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2004/2004_06648.htm 9/22/2004 Matter of Paulette Satur Mueller v Lomng the Muellers to obm~ site pl~ approval for cons~ction e gee~ouses. P~su~t to the Town's zo~g ordin~ee, site pl~ app~val must be obtahed for "Ia]ny ch~ge in use or intensi~ of use w~ch will affect the ch~actedstics of~e site h te~s of p~g, loading, access, drayage, open space or utilities" (Code of To~ of Sou~old ~ 100-250). ~e McN~as ~her noted ~at prior to ~e construction of~e gree~ouses, they had unobstructed view ~om ~e ~ont whdow of ~eir home to the f~ field across Alva's Lane. They also pointed out that had the Muelle~ placed ~e ~e~omes on ~e no.western potion of their ptope~ ~ compli~ce wi~ ~e F~l~d Co~i~ee's decision, they would not have lost ~eir scenic view of open f~l~d. ~e Muellers ~gued that there had been no ch~ge h ~e intensiW of~e a~icul~ use of~e~ prope~ since crops had always been ~own ye~ ro~d. In addition, ~e Muellers ma~ta~ed that even if the extension of ~e ~w~g se~on for ce~in crops comtimted ~ ~te~ification of ~e a~icul~al use of the prope~, such me did not ~ect open space because ~e ~ee~omes covered less th~ one percent of~e f~ prope~. Follow~g a public he~ing, ~e Zo~g Bo~d ~mted ~e appeal, concluding ~at site pl~ approval w~ requked prior to iss~ce of a b~l~g ~mit for ~e ~ee~ouses. In suppo~ of its dete~ination, ~e Zo~g Bo~d stated ~at "[t]he ~ee~ouses · · · total approx~mely 6000 squ~e feet. By sheer s~e ~one ~ese c~ot be considered m~or accesso~ s~c~es. ~e footpr~t creat~ by such subsmti~ ~e~omes as well ~ ~eir placement on ~e prope~ constitute a ch~ge in intensi~ of use which will affect, at a minimm, open space. ~us, p~su~t to [Code of Tom of Sou~old] ~ 100-250 site pl~ approval w~ requi~d as a con~fion precedent [Zoning] Bo~d notes ~at in totaling approximately 6000 squ~e feet ~ese s~c~es l~ger ~ ~e majod~ of the structures ~ ~e Tom." ~s. Mueller subsequently co~enced ~s proceed~g m ~ ~e Zon~g Bond's detemination. ~e Supreme Co~ ~ted ~e petition, Finding ~at ~ere w~ no evidence that the tempor~ ~ee~ouses would increase the volme of a~icul~al production on the prope~, which historically had been used m ~ow crops. ~ng bo~ds have broad discretion in ~te~reting loc~ zoffing or~n~ces ~d a cou~ may not substitute its jud~ent for ~at of~e zon~g bo~d (see Matter oflpah v Utschig, 98 ['3]~2d 304, 308; Matter of 550 Halstead Corp. v ~ning Bd of ~ppeals of Tow~Vil. http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2004/2004-O6648'htm 9F22/2004 Matter of Paulette Satur Mueller v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold (20... Page 4 of 4 of Harrison, 307 AD2d 291, affd I NY3d 561). Thus, a zoning board's determination must be upheld if it is rational and supported by substantial evidence, even if the reviewing court would have reached a different result (see Matter oflfrah v Utschig, supra at 308; Matter of P.M.S. Assets v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Vii. of Pleasantville, 98 NY2d 683, 685; Matter of Sasso v Osgood, 86 NY2d 374, 384; Matter of Savetsky v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Southampton, 5 AD3d 779, 780, lv denied NY3d [Aug. 31, 2004]). Here, the record clearly demonstrates that the very purpose of the greenhouses is to increase the farm's productivity by extending the growing season of certain crops, and enabling other crops to survive the winter. While it is true that crops have historically been grown on the farm, it cannot be said that the Zoning Board's determination that the greenhouses will intensify the existing agricultural use is irrational (see Matter of 550 Halstead Corp. v Zoning Bd of Appeals of Town~Vii. of Harrison, supra; Matter of Saladino v Fernan, 204 AD2d 554). Furthermore, the Zoning Board also rationally concluded that the addition of two structures totaling 6000 square feet is a change which affects the farm's "open space" within the meaning of the local zoning ordinance. In this regard, it should be noted that one of the reasons the Town has deemed farming to be essential to the community is that farms "provide fresh food, clean air, economic diversity and aesthetic open spaces" (Code of Town of Southold § 100-220). The task of balancing a farmer's need to increase productivity by constructing improvements against the need to preserve open space for the enjoyment of all is a matter best left to the local zoning board. Consequently, the Supreme Court should have denied the petition. The parties' remaining contentions are without merit. ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, KRAUSMAN and COZIER, JJ., concur. ENTER: James Edward Pelzer Clerk of the Court http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dsefies12004/2004_O6648.htm 9/22/2004 Comell Cooperative Extension . Suffolk CmmW ~ ' ' ""' '"'; ~:sa~ ~-'~,o Suffolk County Farmland Select Conunittne C/0 Mr. Ben Orlowski, Chairman H. Lee Dennison Building Vete~ms Memorial Iti~mty Hn~ppsng~ NY 11788 OIJUNI8 .q, lO: ,12 At the request of the Suffolk Count~ Farmland Select Committee, Dale Moyer and I visited the Sntur Farm ir Cutchogue on Tuesday, May 29. We ~ with Panlntt~ Sstor for about one hour conc~ning tl~ location of her two greenhousns on the land in the Suffolk County PDR prngrant We walked around tho farm and discussed the options available to the west of her home and the no~PDR lan just north of the hou~ To us the one likely location would be the area now planted to aspara~s that is west her home. The crop is in the second season. She had objections to all of the eltematives su~eated. She also talked about reloceting these greenhouses onto another farm proper~ that she is hoping to purchase. She indicated that she ia bidding on the second farm and nmy not have it settled in the near future. When I mentioned that the Committ~ would likely approve waiting to the end of the 2001 growing season, she aske~ they would extend it for two or thrne seasons. S..everal times I pointed out to her the criteria that the committee uses to rate land, for the PDR prngr~ and th~ p. omons of the land and that request was approved. She elnime that sh~ thOtt~ht that it m her choice as to locating the gree~o-ses where they are cur~nt~y. I remioded her several times that by not followinB the a,F?oved plan, her neighbors and a number of the committee members were opposed to the current location. _At this point, we do not feel that Paulette 5ntur h~ been willinff to even cop_*!4~ any other L,y:~6~ This is th ~hhmee r,.eaction !hat sh.e displayed when Ben Orlowski met with her before the May Committee meeting. neretore we oo not nave a suggestion at this time for an alternate location for the greenhouses. Ben Orlowski suggested that members of the committee stop and look at the farm to see the situation firsthand. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to talk with me or Dale Meyer. Sincerely, Extension Educator Agricultural Program Director WJS:II Itelping t~)t, Put Knowledge to Work TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPT. 765-1802 INSPECTION [ ] FOUNDATION 1ST [ ] ROUGH PLBG. [ ] FOUNDATION 2ND [ ] INSULATION [ ] FRAMING / STRAPPING [ ] FINAL [ ] FIREPLACE & CHIMNEY [ ] FIRE SAFETY INSPECTION [ ] FIRE RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION [ ] FIRE RESISTANT PENETRATION REMARKS: ~__.~~ 1 //~//~ /~ 7~ .,.../(Cz'/ '" vC//~ / ~ ,.~/rtl"'['....-.~/~i/,/I / ~ L DATE 7'~//~ ""~ ~' INSPECTOR__~'~ File # TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMPLA~LNT REFERRAL FORM Location of Complaint: Property Owner: Address: SCTM# Phone NATURE OF COMPLAINT: ACTION TAKEN: Optional: Complainant: Address Repo~ Taken By: Date Referred to Code Enforcement: By Phone__ Mail In Person Phone: v// Date: ~7,//~/~O 7 CODE ENFORCEMENT REPORT S,-E ,,SPE~ON REPORT~DA','E..' ~' ~'/-0 7 ~ ~ ACTION/DATE: ~~ ~;~~~.-~-" ~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-9502 Telephone (631 ) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD STOP WORK ORDER TO: Paulette Satur Mueller Eberhard Mueller 3705 Alvahs Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED TO SUSPEND ALL WORK AT: 3705 Alvahs Lane, Cutcho,que TAX MAP NUMBER - 1000-101-2-24.5 Pursuant to Section 144-8 of the Code of the Town of Southold, New York, you are hereby notified to immediately suspend all work and building activities until this order has been rescinded. BASIS OF STOP WORK ORDER: Construction without first obtainin.q a Buildinfl Permit CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH WORK MAY BE RESUMED: When a Building Permit has been issued the construction may commence. DATE: July 19, 2007 George Gillen Building Inspector (cert. mail) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER LAND IMP. STREET 1 ACR. /, TYPE OF BLD. PROP. CLASS TOTAL / DATE VILLAGE REMARKS FRONTAGE ON WATER FRONTAGE ON ROAD DEPTH BULKHEAD TILLABLE WOODLAND MEADOWLAND HOUSE/LOT TOTAL Extension ~reezewa O.B._/; , ~ooI Foundation Basement Ext. Walls Fire Place Dormer Driveway FULL Bath Floors Interior Finish Heat Woodstove Dinette Kit. L.R. BR. Fin. B. Attic Rooms 1st Floor Rooms 2nd Floor M. Bldg. ~ /~ ~,~,~-~ ~'f~ ~'o?-'~<~' ~,~__ Foundation Bath Extension Basement Floors Extension Ext. Wails Interior Finish Extension Fire Place Heat Porch Pool Attic Deck Patio Rooms 1st Floor Breezeway Driveway Rooms 2ncl Floor Garage " · -~'~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P~ROPERTY RECORD CARD I.~ ,,, . ,,..~. ,~ kb.. I ~ OWNER STREET '~ ' ' ~ ~-~ VI LLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT FOYER OWNER ~~,' ~ 0~ · S W ~PE OF BUILDING ~./ s~s. VL f2~ FA~~ CO~. CB. ~CS. ~ND IMP. TOTAL DATE R~RKS a ~ q~ t, "l " I 0 ~o~Z'z ~oc/ ,h~l~ ~Z,~ , ,, ,, ,~o , IV~ i, I__~ ~1 ~ . '-/- ' ' ~l , fl~c)~, ~lllll// [ .- . ~ FRONTAGE ON WATER ~ DEPTH OWNER Ia< r/4ard M~e. gl~r LAND .~ooo IMP. / OO6> ; /o.. ~,o o TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD ^CR. /, T~ TYPE OF BLD. PROP. CLASS TOTAL / DATE F.ONT^ ?~WATERJ FRONTAGE ON ROAD m DEPTH m BULKHEAD / MEADOWLAND HOUSE/LOT TOTAL TILLABLE WOODLAND COLOR TRIM Bath Dinette M. Bldg. Foundation E xtension~ Basement I iL~WL Floors Interior Finish Extension ~/ -- Heat Ext. Walls Extension Fire Place Patio PO rch_____~Deck ~ Attic Breezeway Garage ~~"~ Pool .... I vow. oF sou~.o,D,.o,E.~'¥.Eco.~> c^.~> I OWNER STREET I VILLAGE DIST, I REMARKS ACR. TYPE OF BLD. PROP, CLASS LAND IM P, TOTAL DATE SUB. LOT FRONTAGE ON WATER 1 TILLABLE FRONTAGE ONROAD DEPTH BULKHEAD WOODLAND MEADOWLAND HOUSE/LOT TOTAL ~.~,~,~ / i~{,~ ~,Z~- ~ --~ ~% ~ ~ Foundation c.8. ~ Bath Dinette '~ Basement C~WL ~ I~ Floors Kit. Extension )~ ~ : ~ ~ s~ Extension Ext. Walls ~ ~_ Interior Finish LR. xtehsion ~l ~/~= /~c~'~ ~' ~ ~ FirePlace ~ Heat D.R. ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ //~ ~ Woodstove BR. ~2,~ -~ /C~/~ ~ ~ /~ g ~ ~jO Dormer Fin. B. ~; ~,~,,,t jo~ , Z~ Z ~/ Attic Breezeway Rooms 1st Floor G~r~ ~ ~:~ ~,ff leo Driveway Rooms 2nd Floor TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDIN~ DEPARTMENT Office of the Building I~Spector Town Hall $outhold, N.Y. TH~$ CERTIFIES that the building Hamlet Lot 24.5 Lot NO. conforms substantially to the Requirements for a One Family Dwelling built Rev. l/B1 A- I P~S. ( type ) (municipality) LOT(s) VIOLATIONS: CflAPTgg 45 N.Y. STATE UN[FORM FIRE PREVENTION & BUll,DING CODE LOCATION DESCRIPTION ART, SEC. FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTBOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Office of the Building Inspector Town Hall 8outhold, N.Y. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCy No; Z-26065 Date: 10/27/98 THIS CERTIFIES that the building NEW DWELLING Location of Froperty: 3705 ALVANS LA (HOUSE NO.) (STREET) County Tax Map No. 473889 Section 101 Block 2 (HAMLET) . Lot 24.8 subdivision Filed Map No. __Lot No. -- conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated JULY 16~ 1997 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 24321-Z dated AUGUST 20~ 1997 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements Of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is ONE FAMILY DWELLING WITH RAISED TERRACE & 2ND FLOOR TERRACES AS APPLIED FOR & AS TO CONDITIONS OF ZBA %4484 * The certificate is issued to BBEPd~ARD & PAULETTE SATUR MULLER of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEVOTemENT OF HEALTH A~PROVAL R10-97-010~ 10/20/98 ELBCTRIC;LL C~RTIFICATE NO. N-454741 05/28/98 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED 10/21/98 BERTSAND PLUMB.&HEATING * ~iXISTING COTTAGE CONVERTED TO A NON-HABJ[T, A4~L'E'~ACCI~SSORY STRUCTURE. Building In~ector Rev. 1/81 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET~.~ 7~)~ VILLAGE DIS'r. SUB. LOT )~o~,' ~ 0~' S W ~PE OF ~UtLDING " R~. J S~S. VL. 1~ FARM~ CO~. CB. MI~. Mkt. Valu, ~ND IMP. TOTAL DATE R~RKS ~o~/ ~ 2~o ,~ ~ q/,/~f ,, ,, ,, ~ ~ o/,/~ ,, ,, h ~llable ~ ~'14 i~ ~land ~ - ' FRONTAGE ON ROAD ~ DEPTH LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Approved Proiect Type: Site Plans Status: Final - Pendin.q Inspection SCTM#: 1000- 101.-2-24.5 Proiect Name: Satur Farms Barn Address: 3705 Alvah's Lane, Cutcho.que Hamlet: Peconic Applicant Name: Paulette Satur Owner Name: Paulette Satur Zone 1: A-C Approval Date: 6/11/2002 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 6/11/2002 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: Located at 3705 Alvah's Lane, Cutcho,que. SC Filin.q Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M A.qreement: SCANNED JAN 62009 [ Records Management SCAN Date: PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ BE_~.~ETT O~WSKI, JR. ~ Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS ~NNETH L~ EPHODS GEORGE RITCHIE ~TH~, JR. RICED G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Date Received .Date Completed Filing Fee APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN New Change of Use Re-use Extension Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: ~A'TL¢R. F"~,&/~_~ SCTM#: ~000- /01 Location: ~O~ Aaaress: N~me of ~plic~nt: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: Agent or Person responsible for application: /~ldress: Telephone: Site plans prepared by: License No. Address: Telephone: Page 2 ~r F~,'annlng Board Site Plan Application STATE OF NEW YORK COUN1Y OF SUFFOU( being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above properW, or that he is the C[Itle) / (Specify whether Parteershlp or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Sl~e Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submi~ed, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in s~ricl: accordance with the plans submiU:ed. signed (Owner) Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and Tltte) Pa~e 3 Planning Board Site Plan Application Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) = go~oo~ 35- ~ Zoning District · Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses prbposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use is proposed per I~uilding, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. ~0. ,~% Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) IN21.G~ Gross Root Ama of Proposed Structure(s) - Percent of Lat Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a vadance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals - Case # & date Board of Trustees - Case # & date NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other NO Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit Issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PlAN BY PLANNINOBOAI~D. VIOLATO~$A£ESUBJECTTOP£OSECUTION. Site Plan Applications Public Hearings Under the current site plan application procedure, the process for reviewing a site plan application is: a public hearing is not scheduled and held by the Planning Board until after, among other things, the site plan has received a stamped Health Department approval. The applicant shall now have the following options: 1. To follow the established procedure, or To have the Planning Board schedule and hold a public hearing on the site plan application and have the Planning Board vote on the proposed conditional site plan prior to the applicant receiving Health Departs, ent approval subject to the following conditions: Ao The applicant hereby agrees and understands that if the site plan which receives stamped-Health Department approval differs in any way from the proposed conditional site plan on which the Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on, then the Planning Board has the right and option, if the change is material to any of the issues properly before the Planning Board, to hold a public hearing on this "revised" site plan application and review its conditional approval. The applicant agrees not to object to a new public hearing and Planning Board review of the revised application. Applicant Agreement on Site Plans. The applicant is aware of the terms of this approval and certifies to these terms by his/her signature below. SCTM#: lO00- / O - A Y, 5' Applioant Date 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) AFPUCANT PO.SO. I 2. P.OJECT N^ME 3, PROJECT LOCATION: 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road Intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) IS PRO SED ~ ~anslon ~ M~lflcatlo~alteratlon 7. AMOU~ OF ~ND AFFECTED: SEQR WILL POSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LANe USE RESTRICTIONS? No If No, describe briefly S. ~(AT IS PRESENT LANO USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [:::] Industrial I-'1Commemlal ~Ag¢lculture [] Patl</Forest/Open space [] Other 10. DOE~ ACTION INVOLVE~ PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAl., mATE OR LOOAL)? / [] Yea ~] No If yes, Iisi agent.s) and permlUapprovals 11. DOES ANY ~CY OF THE Ao'rlON HAVE A CURREN'n.Y VAUO PERMIT OR APPROVAL'/ [] Yes 1'4 No If ye~, Pst Igen~/nl, m~ e~l i~fmll/app~w, II RESULT OF~ROPO~ED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MOOIFICATION? I-lYes ~No I (~8~11FY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you am a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART H--ENV!RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ('r° be como'sled by Age'~cy) C5. Growth, subsequenl development, or relaled activities likely to be induced by Ihs proposed action? Explain briefly. C~. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects riel identified in Cl-C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other Impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly, D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CEA? [] Yen [] No E. IS THERE~ OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATES TO POTENTIAL AOVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If Yes, explain briefly PART III--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each edveme effect Identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, Important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed In connection with Its fa) setting (i.e. ud~an or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; Id) Irrevemlblllty; (e) geographic scope; ami If) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supPorting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that ell relevant nd~erse impacts have been Identlilnd and adequately addressed. If question D of Pert II wes checked yes, the determination and significance must evaluate the potential Impact of the pmposnd eclion on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. [] Check this box If you have Identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF end/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box If you have determined, based on the information and analysis above end any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: 2 6]7.20 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question ! ] of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-V, '1,.'12 '1,.3 ~ 5~,/ · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available [] [] [] to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public [] [] [] [] observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? ' A site or structure listed on the Hational or State [] [] [] Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks'2 [] [] [] [] · The State Forest Preserve? [] [] [] [] · Hational Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? [] [] [] [] · Hational Hatural Landmarks and other outstanding [] [] [] [] natural features? · Hational Park Service lands? [] [] [] [] [~/ · Rivers designated as Hattonal or State Wild, Scenic [] [] [] [] [~' or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such [] [] [] [] [~' as part of the Interstate System, or.Amtrak? ' A governmentally established or designated Interstate or Inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or deslgnatlon? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] [] [] [] [] scenic? · /Vtunlcipal park, or designated open space? [] [] [] [] · County road? [] ~ [] [] [~// ' State? [] [] [] [] · Local road? [~/ [] [] [] [] 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes [~Ho 3. Are any of the resources checked In question 1. used by the public during the time of year during which the pr_..~ect will be visible? I-Wes ~Ho DES~(~RIPTION OF EX,6TING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. 'From each item checked in question l, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *~h mile .~*1 mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] ~>~c~T~-'~. Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial [] Commercial [] Urban [] River, Lake, Pond LZJ/ Cliffs, Overlooks [] Designated Open Space L~/ Flat Hilly [] Mountainous [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually slm~ar projects within: °1/2 mile [~/Ye s E~No *1 miles [-q'].Ye s CiNo *2 miles ~Z~.~es []No '3 miles r-~Yes CJNo * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriat( EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is HOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity In which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUEHCY Holidays/ Activity D~ Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] ~1 Involved In recreational activities [~/ [] r~ ~ Routine travel by residents [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At workslte [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [] 2 14,16-2 (9/95)-- 7c 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SE'QR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- Iy, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may nc~t be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. ~ The full £AF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full E^F is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: I-1 A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because t~e mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' C. The project may result in one or more large and important Impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Tltie of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer In Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMAT'-'N ,,,r Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: ]'his document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a s~§n[ficant effect. on the enviro'~ment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions witt be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review· Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. it is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Slree{ Address, Municipality and ~unt~ NAME OF A~ ~ANT~NSOR I EUSINESS TELEPHONE 35'- NAME OF OWNER 0t dlfterdm~) STATE [ ZIP CODE IBU~INEg~ TELEPHONE ) ADDRESS ClTYIPO ~-~ESCRIPTION OF ACTION Please Complete Each Question--indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both deyeloped 8nd undevelo.ped areas, 1. Present land use: I-IOrban I-II/p~ustria[ UlCommeroal ' [~'~idential (suburban] {3Rural (non-farm) I-IForest I~Agriculture I-IOther 2. Total acreage of project area: i ' ~ . acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY Meadow or Brushland (Non.agricultural)" acres acres Forested ?~-~ acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) ~, Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres ~ acres Water Surface Area -- acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) ~ acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces ~ acres AFTER COMPLETION acres ~Y~ t UI -, acres Other (indicate type) ' 3. What is predominant soil ~m(s) on pro ect site~ ~cc~'*e'~'~ a. Soil drainage: (~ell drained ~ ~C3 % of site I"lModerately well drained _ - % of site · I-Ipoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is Involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System~' acres. (See I NYCRUp). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppffigs on project slte~ OYes LOgo a. What Is depth to bedrock~ , (in feet) 2 i 5 Approximate pe~entage of propo~Ll~l~proiect site with slopes: ~]0-10% [~10-15% % I ,~- [~]15% or greater % co tain a 6 Is project sqbstantially contiguous to, or building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? {:]Yes / 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Nature Landmarks? E]Yes ~No 8 What is the depth of the water table? ~"~ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~-¥e$ fqNo .,. 10 Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [:]Yes [~o 11. Does project site c~ain any species of plant or animal life that Lis identified as threatened or endangered? [:]Yes[~o According to Identify each species 12. Are there any uniq~, or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [:}Yes L~O Describe 13. Is the project site~sently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? I-lYes r-INo If yes, explain 14. Does the present ~t/e include scenic views known to be important to the community? r-lYes I~iNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: ./1~ ~ ~__ . a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name A/,.~._~ o~ // b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes ONo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow Connection? I~s I-INo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~ I-INo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~ I"lNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I-lYes 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes~ I-lYes B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or co, ntrolled by project sponsor I ~' acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ), ~5 acre's initially; ) r ~ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped /~ ,'~---- acres. d. Length of project, in miles: -- (if appropriate) e. 'If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ~ %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed ~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour I · (upon'completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially I ~ ~ ~ Ultimately / -~ ~' -' i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~ height; ~-- width; ~ length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy Is~' ~ ~ fL 3 How much ~tural material ( rock, eart , etc.) will be removed from t' -ire? 2 ~e 3 will disturb~'~ areas be reclaimed? s [=]No a. If~yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? h. will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes [:3No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [~Yes C3No 4 How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed-from site? __ _ acres 5. Will any mature foist (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? C]Yes [~o 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~ ~ months, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: ~ a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of. commencement phase 1 month _ c. ^pproximate completion date of final phase month d. is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [:]Yes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction L) y~., ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~-~ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [:3Yes Qb tonsicub~c yards year, (including demolition) year. If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes I~[No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~]Yes /~o Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain i-lYes OYes [~o 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? OYes J~xNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing 'solid waste facility be used? OYes [:]No c. If yes, give name ..; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? C3Yes e. If Yes, explain I~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal?. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life1 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes OYes ~No tons/month. years. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes ~'No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [:]Yes ~No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? E3Ye~ UNo If yes, indicate type(s) ~o3~ ~::~o~,,~ ~. gallons/minute. 22. if water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity . 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~ ~E) gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes If Yes, explain 4 The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible co~tflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever actioi~ is necessary to avoid same. NATURE OF APPX,XCATION~ (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Variance Change of zone Approval of plat Exemption from plat or offic[a~ map Other ~ ownership of (or employment by) a corporation itt which If you answered 'YES,' complete the balance of this form and Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant) a~d the town officer or employee. Either ~heck the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space p~ovided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply)~ __A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant (when the applicant is a corporatio,); .B) the legal Or beneficial owner of any interest lua noncorporate e*mtity (when the applicant is {}ota corporation)~ C) an officer, director, partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF EELATIONSHIP Submitted th~-a _~day of/~/~ shown hereon ore from field observ~ ~ '"' ,. one or from dolo obfoined from ARE REFE~ TO T~ FIVE ~e ~ MAPS. o. SURVEY OF Feb. 27, 7997 CERTIFIED TO, EBERHARO MULLER PAULETTE SA TUR MUtLER C~EAt ~ LA~ TITL~ INSTANCE CO.ANy RH 97 ~59 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 05/10/02 Transaction(s): Application Fees Receipt8: 1921 Subtotal $560.25 Check#: 1921 Total Paid: $560.25 Southold Town Planning Board Name: Satur, Farms LIc 3705 Alvahs Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Clerk ID: JOYCEW Intemal ID: 54416 Board of/%ppeals Town ot SoutholC FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 7, 2001 Appl. No. 4909 - Patdcia and James McNamam STREET & LOCATION: 3705 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue 1000-101-2-24.5 and 24.6 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: February 27, 2001; March 15, 2001 I. NATURE OF APPEAL: Appellants, Patricia and James McNamara, request that the Zoning Board of Appeals reverses a Building Permit (N0. 26821-Z) dated October 4, 2000 issued to Eberhard Mueller and Paulette Satur Mueller to construct two greenhouses. East greenhouse measures 30 by 96 feet. II. RELIEF REQ. UESTED:. Appellants maintain that the Building Inspector erred in issuing the building permit, because, pursuant to Southold Town Code Section 100-250, site plan approval by the Town Planning Board was required for this project prior to a building permit being issued. Site plan approval was not obtained. II1. PF~)PERTY FAcTS/DESCRIPTION: The property consists of approximately 18 acres situate along the west side of Alvah's Lane in Cutchogue and is improved with a newly constructed house, a cottage converted to a storage building, and a barn. The greenhouses were constructed about 70 feet from the front property line. Of the 18 acres, the development rights on approximately 16 acres were sold to the County of Suffolk. The property is more specifically described as SCTM Pamel #1000-101-2-24.5'which covers that portion of the lot on which the development rights have not been sold, and SCTM Parcel #1000-101-2-24.6 which covers that portion of the lot on which the development rights have been sold. IV. MATTERS CONSIDERED: 1) Eberhard~lueller and Paulette Satur Mueller own the parcel for which this building permit was applied. 2) The McNamara's own a parcel of property and live directly across the street from the property for which the Building Permit in question was issued. 3) Construction of the greenhouses was originally begun without building permits. The Building Department stopped the work and subsequently the property owners applied for and received building permit No. 26821-Z. 4) The greenhouses each measure 30 x 96 feet. The square footage of the greenhouses totals approximately 6000 square feet. The greenhouses have no heat. The floors are the 003 Page 2 - J'une 7, Appl. No. 4909- P. and J. McNamara 1000-101-2-24.5 and 24.6 5) The Building Inspector testified that there was no distinction between a temporary or permanent building under the Town Code. The Building Inspector further testified that the greenhouses met the definition of building under the Town Code and therefore a building permit was required. 6) Pursuant to the Southold Town Code ~e.property owned by the Muellers is a single lot, despite the fact that the lot has two Suffolk County Tax .Map Numbers. There was no subdivision involved, just the sale of the development fights on the maj~)rity of the parcel. Two.SCTM numbers were issued for ease of taxing purposes; not to indicate two legal, separate and distinct lots as defined by She Town Code. V. APPLICABLE CODE PROVISIONS: Chapter. 100 "Zoning" under Article XXV, Section 100-250 entitled "Site PlanAppmval,' ' which reads as follows: § 100-250. Applicability. This Article shall apply to every, land use that Is permitted, in tho Town of Southold except the .single-family home use on a single and separate lot as set forth in Article Ill, § 100-31A(1), and customary nonagricultural accessory uses to a single- family residential home use as stated In the Town Code. Any change in use or' intensity of use which will affect the characteristics of the site in terms of parking, loading, access, drainage, open space or utilities will require site plan approval. In all cases where this chapter requ!res approval of site development plans by the Planning Board, no building permit shall be issued by the Building Inspector except upon authorization of and. in conformity with the site plan approval by the Planning Board and all other public agencies involved; FINDINGS OF FACT. The Zoning Board of Appeals h'eld a public headng on this matter on February , 2001 and March 15, 2001, at which time wdtten and oral evidence was presented. Based on all testimony, documentation,, personal observations of members of' .the Board and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: Issue before the Board The crucial issue before the Board is whether or not these two greenhouses required site plan approval pursuant to Town Code Section 100-250. Page 3 - June 7, 200 i - ' Appl. No. 4909 - P. and ,,. McNamara i 000-101-2-24.5 and 24.6 The use in question is farming. This is undisputed. Section 100-250 states that Article XXV of the Town Code shall apply to every land use that is permitted in the Town of Southold except that: 1) the single-family home use on a single and separate lot as set forth in Article III, § 100-31A(1); and 2) customary nonagricultural accessory uses to a single-family residential home use as stated in the Town Code Farming is a land use and neither of the exceptions are applicable. Therefore Article XXV of the Town Code applies to farming. (It is important to note that the question before this Board is not whether or not the two buildings are permitted but rather, whether site plan approval is required.) Section 100-250 further states that site plan approval is not required unless there is: 1) a change in use, or / 2) a change in intensity of use which will affect the characteristics of the site in terms of parking, loading, access, drainage, open space or utilities. In this case there is no change in use. The prior use of the property was farming or accessory farming and the greenhouses will be used for the same use. The key question is whether the construction of the two greenhouses constitute a change in intensity of use which will affect the characteristics of the site in terms of parking, loading, access, drainage, open space or utilities. The greenhouses in question together total approximately 6000 square feet. By sheer size alone these cannot be considered minor, accessory.structures. The footprint created by such substantial greenhouses as well as their placement on the property constitute a change in intensity of use which will affect, at a minimum, open space. Thus, pursuant to Town Code section 100-250 site plan approval was required as a condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit: The Board notes that in totaling approximately 6000 square feet these structures are larger than the majority of the structures in the Town. The Muellers raise the questions of Standing, notice and mootness. The Board finds these claims to be without medt. BOARD RESOLUTION/ACTION: Now, therefore, on motion by Member Tortora, seconded by Member Homing, it is Page 4 - June 7, 2001 Appl. No. 4909 - P. and ]. McNamara 1000-101-2~24.5 and 24.6 Resolved, that the Zoning Board of Appeals, based on the 're. cord, the public hearings, the oral testimony and the written submissions, for the reasons set forth above, · hereby f'mds that Mueller's application required site plan approval pursuant to section 100- 250 of the Town Code prior to a building permit being issued; and be. it further Reso ved, that.the Building nspector's decision to grant Bp!lding Permit No. 2682%Z dated October 4, 2000 Is hereby reversed and annulled. VOTE OF THE BOARD: AYES:· Members Goehringer (Chairman), Tortora, and Homing. NAYS: Members Dinizlo and Collins. This Resolution was duly adopted (3-2). .~erard P. Goehringer Chairman / MaVer o52a.u?e~e Sa.tar Mue?Jer v Zoning Boardo. ~ Appea,'s o~ *the *, own o,. ~ Soumo,d*' ' (~.o..'~^ Page ' of',:- ]Matter of MueHer v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of Southoid 2004 NYSlipOp 06648 Decided on September 20, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. Deci'ded on September 20, 2004 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DMSION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARMENT MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P. SONDRA MILLER GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN BARRY A. COZIER, JJ. DECISION & ORDER 2002-11055 [*l]ln the Matter of Paulette Satur Mueiler, petitioner- respondent, V Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold, appellant, et aL, respondents. (Index No. 16967/01) Smith, Finkelstein, Lundberg, Isler & Yakaboski, LLP, Riverhead, N.Y. (Frank A. Isler of counsel), for appellant. Wicldaam, Bressler, Gordon & Geasa, P.C., Melville, N.Y. (Eric J. Bressler of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold dated June 7, 2001, which, after a hearing, annulled the Town Building Inspector's decision to ~mat the petitioner a building permit, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold appeals from a judgment of the Supreme http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2004/2004_06648.htrn 9/22/2004 Matter of Paulette Satur Mueller v Zoning Board of Appeals of the T~ of Southold (20... Page 2 of 4 Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), dated July 1, 2002, which granted the petition, annulled the determination, and reinstated the building permit. ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, the proceeding is dismissed, and the determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold is reinstated. In 1997 the petitioner, Paulette Satur Mueller, and her husband, Eberhard Mueller, purchased an 18-acre farm on Alvah's Lane in the Town of Southold. Mr. Mueller is a celebrated chef, and the Muellers grow organic speciality produce on their farm, both for their own use and for sale to a number of Manhattan and Long Island restaurants. Prior to the Muellers" purchase of the farm, the County of Suffolk acquired development rights, to most of the property as part of its Farmland Development Rights Program. In April 1998 Mrs. Mueller wrote to the Suffolk County Farmland Committee (hereinafter the [*2]Farmland Committee) to request permission to build a greenhouse, which would extend the growing season of certain produce. In her letter, Mrs. Mueller indicated that she and her husband planned to locate the greenhouse at either the northwest or southeast end of the property, and represented that it would not be obtrusive at those sites. They intended the greenhouse to remain in place for the three-year lifespan of the materials of which it was to be constructed. At a meeting later that month, the Farmland Committee approved the construction of a temporary greenhouse at the northwestern lo. cation, "subject to local requirements." Thereai~er, without obtaining a building permit, the Muellers constructed two temporary greenhouses on the northeastern portion .of their farm, approximately 70 feet from the front property line. The greenhouses each measure 30 feet by 96 feet, and total approximately 6000 square feet. When the Construction came to the Town's attention, the Town Building Inspector informed Mrs. Mueller that a building permit was required for the greenhouses. Mrs. Mueller then applied for and obtained a building permit for the structures. Patricia McNamara and James McNamara, who reside across the street from the Mueller farm, appealed the decision to issue the building permit to the Town's Zoning Board of Appeals (hereinafter the Zoning Board). In support of their appeal, the McNamaras argued that the Building Inspector erred in issuing the building permit without fa:st requiring http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2004/2004_06648.htm 9/22/2004 Matter of Pau[e~e Satur MueL~er v Zoning Board of AppeaSes off, he Town of Sout~ho;d (29... Page the Muellers to obtah~ site plan approval for construction of the greenhouses. Pursuant to the Town's zoning ordinance, site plan approval must be obtained for "[a]ny change in use or intensity of use which will affect the characteristics of the site in terms of parking, loading, access, drainage, open space or utilities" (Code of Town of Southold § 100-250). The McNamaras further noted that prior to the construction of the greenhouses, they had an unobstructed view from the front window of their home to the farm field across Alvah's Lane. They also pointed out that had the Muellers placed the greenhouses on the northwestern portion of their property in compliance with the Farmland Committee's decision, they would not have lost their scenic view of open farmland. The Muellers argued that there had been no change in the intensity of the agricultural use of their property since crops had always been grown year round. In addition, the Muellers maintained that even if the extension of the growihg season for certain crops constituted an intensification of the agricultural use of the property, such use did not affect open space because the greenhouses covered less than ~ne percent of the farm property. Following a public hearing, the Zoning Board granted the appeal, concluding that site plan approval was required prior to issuance of a building permit for the greenhouses. In support of its determination, the Zoning Board stated that "[t]he greenhouses.., total approximately 6000 square feet. By sheer size alone these cannot be considered minor accessory structures. The footprint created by such substantial greenhouses as well as their placement on the property constitute a change in intensity of use which will affect, at a minimum, open space. Thus, pursuant to [Code of Town of Southold] § 100-250 site plan approval was required as a condition precedent to the issuance of a building permit. The [Zoning] Board notes that in totaling approximately 6000 square feet these structures are larger than the majority of the structures in the Town." Mrs. Mueller subsequently commenced this proceeding to annul the Zoning Board's: determination. The Supreme Court granted the petition, finding that there was no evidence that the temporary greenhouses would increase the volume of agricultural production on the property, which historically had been used to grow crops. Zoning boards have broad discretion in interpreting local zoning ordinances and a court may not substitute its judgment for that of the zoning board (see Matter oflfrah v Utschig, 98 [* 3]NY2d 304, 308; Matter of 550 Halstead Corp. v Zoning Bat of Appeals of Towrdgil. http://www.courts.state.ny.us/repo~er/3dseries/2004/201M_06648.htm 9/22/2004 Matter of Paulette Satur Mueller v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southolfl (20... Page 4 oI 4 of Harrison, 307 AD2d 291, affd I NY3d 561). Thus, a zoning board's determination must be upheld if it is rational and supported by substantial evidence, even if the reviewing court would have reached a different result (see Matter oflfrah v Utschig, supra at 308; Matter of P.M.S. Assets v Zoning Bd. of .~ppeals of Vil. of Pleasantville, 98 NY2d 683, 685; Matter of Sasso v Osgood, 86 NY2d 374, 384; Matter of Savetsky v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Southampton, 5 AD3d 779, 780, lv denied NY3d [Aug. 31, 2004]). Here, the record clearly demonstrates that the very purpose of the greenhouses is to increase the farm's productivity by extending the growing season of certain crops, and enabling other crop~ to survive the winter. While it is tree that crops have historically been grown on the farm, it cannot be said that the Zoning Board's determination that the greenhouses will intensify the existing agricultural use is irrational (see Matter of 550 Halstead Corp. v Zoning Bd of Appeals of Town/I~il. of Harrison, supra; Matter of Saladino v Fernan, 204 AD2d 554). Furthermore, the Zoning Board also rationally concluded that the addition of two structures totaiing 6000 square feet is a change which affects the farm's "open space" within the meaning of the local zoning ordinance. In this regard, it should be noted that one of the reasons the Town has deemed farmk, g to be essential to the community is that farms / "provide fresh food, clean air, economic ~iversity and aesthetic open spaces" (Code of Town of Southold § 100-220). The task of balancing a farmer's need to increase productivity by constructing improvements against the need to preserve open space for the enjoyment of all is a matter best left to the local zoning board. Consequently, the Supreme Court should have denied the petition. The parties' remaining contentions are without merit. ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, KRAUSMAN and COZIER, JJ., concur. ENTER: James Edward Pelzer Clerk of the Court http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2004/2004_06648.htm 9/22/2004 G and L Architect~38 Fulton St. #3 New York, NY 10038 962.1292 f212.962.1293 DATE: TO: TEL: FROM: RE: MESSAGE: TRANSMTITAL June 27, 2002 Paulette Satur Satur Farms 3705 Alvah's Lane Cutchogue Long Island 613.734.4219 Randall Goya Satur Farms Barn Dear Paulette and Eberhard, Please find enclosed three copies of BD0.1 as requested Regards, Randall Goya G and L Architects ; o!, thold Town Board THIS FACSIMILE CONTAINS PRIVELEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF TIJIS FACSIMILE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION OR COPYING OF THIS FACSIMILE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU NAVE RECEIVED THIS IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL FACSIMILE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA US POSTAL DERVlCE, THANK YOU. 020~ 10_~Sa'lu~_dol~.DOC ~Pl ~no~ JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAiN ROAD Fax. (516)-765- 1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel.(516)-765-1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 June 5, 2002 Re: Satur Barn - SCTM #: 1000-101-02-24.5 3705 Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue, New York Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, I have reviewed the drainage calculations for the above referenced project. The drainage design meets the minimum requirements of the Town Code. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. P~LANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATH-kM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 June 11,2002 Ms. Paulette Satur c/o Satur Farms 3705 Alvah's Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Satur Farms Located at 3705 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-101-2-24.5 Zone: A-C Dear Ms. Satur: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 10, 2002: The final public hearing was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Pauline Satur and Eberhard Mueller are the owners of the property known and designated as Satur Farms, located at 3705 Alvah's Lane in Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, this site plan is for a barn and covered equipment area; and WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by the Building Department on June 10, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Town Engineer has reviewed the drainage calculations and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on May 13, 2002; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said Satur Farms application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on May 13, 2002; and Satur Farms - Paqe Two - June 11,2002 WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the surveys, dated February 1,2002 and last revised April 10, 2002, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to a one year review from date of building permit. Enclosed please find two copies of the approved site plan; one for your records and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your building permit. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Odowski, Jr. Chairman encl. cc: Building Department Tax Assessors G AND L ARCHITECTS 138 FULTON ST. NO. 3 NEW YORK, NY 10038 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notices(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on '~Fu~_ /0~ o~-00~ , I have sent notices, by certified mail, the receipts of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the above mentioned property ~,z~,~ L e'"i'V~ 5 A~-',~ '~ Your name Signature Ad d tess Date Notary Public PLE,4SE £ETU£1V ll-IIS ,4FFID,4 VI T ,41VD CE£ TIFIED MAIL £ECEIP TS OIV TIlE DAY OF. 0£ ,4 ? THE PUBLIC HE,4£1NG Re: Proposed Site Plan for Satur Farms SCTM#: 1000-101-2-24.5 Date of Hearing: Monday, June 10, 2002, 6:00 p.m. t~!~.~ s.go~mplete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete ~ ~ ' ,~I~. if~n 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. f,.d=~),; · Print your neme and address on the reverse C3 ; : ~ ,,, ~ ~, r,~;,~,. ) ~ so that we can return the card to you. I ¢c / · Attach thscard to the back of the ma pece '-"' ~""~'° ~0 i 0 ' =,Il ~':~,,;; ~ ~;'~"'='"'--~--- ~- .................... ~/o r,-, ..... , ~LtTC. RC)~U I "- IIQi ' ,,;;,, ~, / NF-JA YOI~K, Ny 10OF+ 2. Ad fir, PS F( (Transfer from ~er'llce Jebel) PS Form 3811, August 2001 D. Is delivery address diffemm from item 1 ? [] Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: [] NO 3. Se~iceType {J~,J;;ertifled Mail [] Registemd [] Insured Mail [] Express Mail [] Return Receipt for Merchandie [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Oelivery? (Extra Fee) [] Ye~ 3. Service Type [~] Certified Mail [] Express Mall i'-I Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchendl. [] Insured Mall [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 7001 1940 0004 0641 5617 102595-01 -M- IlS'SC 1,4AiN RDAD ~/wiTucK, NV IIC1~;2__ 2. Article Number (Transfer f~om ~ervice label) PS Form 3811, August 2001 [] Express Mail [] Retum Receipt for Merchand [] C.O.D. Restdcte~Delivery? {Extra Fee) [] Yes 7001 1940 0004 0~41 5600 'J~pmeetic Return Receipt lo2595-01-M< · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the mver~ so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the Pack of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Nticle Addressed to: Printed Name) D. Is delivery address different f~om item 1 ? If YES, enter delivery address below: r'l Agent [] Addressee [] NO C. UTCHOC:SUE' t NV' IiCi · C-,~131ete items 1, 2, ~d 3. ~ complet~ II(A. S~on~ ~'4 E R~tri~ ~live~ is d~i~. ~ ~ ~t . · Print y~r n~e and add~ on the mve~ ' PS Form 3811, A.gust 2001 Oom~ic .~rn F he ~ot if space ~its. II DYes [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Deliver? {Extra Fee) 2. ArUcle Numbe~ 7001 1940 OI n'r~m~m~,,,~ 1940 0004 0641 5594 : '~h,,( Domestic Return Receipt 102595-01-M-2509 3. s · Type ,~e~iCe~Cer t Eied MaiI [] Registered [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. PS Form 3811, August 2001 -' 1. Article Addressed to: PA-FRiCK ~.. 1410 C~EI',,~ AL. · ,,,-.Y-. NE,~T NEW ¥Ola. ir.~ NY 2. Article Number 7001 1940 ' PS Form 381 1, August 2001 0004 0641 5556 21 Article Number 7001 1940 (7;~,,.~.,'~, from servl~e PS Fo~ 3811, August 2001~Dom~tic Rsturr ~urn R~i~ _ P.O- IqO 2. Article Number (r~fe?f,o~'~ice/~beO 70{91 1940 PS Form 3811, August 2001 3. Se~lce Type .J~.,~'ified Mall [] Express Mail [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandi~ [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4, Restricted {~livery? {Extra Fee) [] Yes 7001 1940 0004 0641 .,549 0[~ 2. AtticleNumbe~ PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Retum Receipt · Complete Items 1, 2, and 3..Nso complete item 4 If Restricted DeliveP/is desimcl. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this can:l to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Nticfe Addreesed to: B. Received by (Pr~mdName) C. Date of D~h~y D. ~sdeliv~yaddms~dtffemntf~3mitem 17 i-I ye~ If YES, el~ter d~ivery address below: [] No I 3. S~vice Type [] Certified Mail [:] ~ Mail n Re~temd n R.~um Receipt for Memhand~e E] ~az~l Ma~ n C.O.D. 4. Reetrlct~d D~liv~3r~ (E~ra F~e) DYe~ 7001 1940 0004 0641 5570 PS Fora3 3811, Augus{ 2001 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax(631) 765-1823 Telephone (631) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOW'NOFSOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Orlowski, Planning Board Chairman Town FROM: Michael J. Verity, Building Department DATE: June 6, 2002 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Satur Farms Location: 3705 Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000 - Section 101 - Block 2 - Lot 24.5 Date: February 01, 2002 Revised Date: April 10, 2002 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE agricultural storage IS/ARE A PERMITTED USE IN THIS AC DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. Principal Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD NIEMBEI~]' BENNETT ORLOWSKI, gR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIA-NO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 10th day of June, 2002 on the question of the following: 6:00 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Satur Farms. The property is located at 3705 AIvah's Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-101-2-24.5 6:05 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision Baxter Sound Estates. The property is located on the north side of Oregon Road, west of Bridge Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-72-2-2.1 Dated: 5/16/02 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, MAY 30, 2002 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPIES SENT TO: Suffolk Times P.O. Box 1179 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 E-Mail: planning@southold.org To: The Suffolk Times From: Valede Scopaz/Carol Fax: Pages: 2 Phone: Date: 5/16/02 Re: Legal Ad for 5/30/02 Edition cc: U~lent For Review Please Comment Please Reply As Requested Please pdnt the following legal ads in the 5/30/02 edition. Thanks. 6/10/02 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Satur Farms Site Plan 6:05 p.m. Baxter Sound Estates Kindly acknowledge receipt by signing below and faxing cover letter back. Received by: Date: PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 10th day of June, 2002 on the question of the following: 6:00 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Satur Farms. The property is located at 3705 Alvah's Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-10t-2-24.5 6:05 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision Baxter Sound Estates. The property is located on the north side of Oregon Road, west of Bridge Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-72-2-2.1 Dated: 5/16/02 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the '16th day of May, 2002 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 6/10/02 Re.qular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the Site Plan of Satur Farms SCTM#1000-101-2-24.5 6:05 p.m. Public Headng for the Minor Subdivision Baxter Sound Estates SCTM#1000-72-2-2.1 Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Swom to before me this /&~day of YY)~7~ ,2002. Notary Public MNDA J, COOPER Notary Public, State of New York No. 4822563, S~:ffolk County Term E×pir~s December 31, PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSK/, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIA~NO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 14, 2002 Ms. Paulette Satur c/o Satur Farms 3705 Alvah's Lane Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Satur Farms Located at 3705 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-101-2-24.5 Zone: A-C Dear Ms. Satur: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 13, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, June 10, 2002, at 6:00 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated February 1, 2002. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board office, Southold town Hall. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting, proof of certified mailing, and the signed green return receipts from the certified mailings on the day of the public hearing before 4:00 p.m. The sign and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board office after the public hearing. Enclosed also is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBEr BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant May '13, 2002 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Site Plan for Satur Farms SCTM#: 1000-101-2-24.5 Location: 3705 Alvah's Lane, Cutchogue SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This proposed site plan is for a new 4,100 sq. ft. barn & a 1,105 sq. ft. roofed canopy equipment storage area on a 1.83 acre parcel in an A-C Zone. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. SEQR Neqative Declaration - Pa.qe Two For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (631)765-1938 cc: Roger Evans, DEC Stony Brook Suffolk County Dept. of Health Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Applicant AFFIDAVIT OF P.OSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notices(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail, the receipts of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the above mentioned property on Your name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN 17-11S AFFIDA VIT AND CEI~TIFIED M~IL I,TECEIPTS ON 11'tE DAF OF. Ole AT 77-1E PUBLIC NEA,eliVG Re: Proposed Site Plan for Satur Farms SCTM#: 1000-101-2-24.5 Date of Hearing: Monday, J.ne ~0, 2002, 6:00 p.m. Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-101-2-24.5; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the A-C Zoning District; That the application is for a new 4,100 sq. f. barn & a 1,105 sq. ft. roofed canopy equipment storage area on a 1.83 acre pamel. The property is located at 3705 AIvah's Lane in Cutchogue; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 3 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, June 10, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. in the MeetinR Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Paulette Satur & Eberhard Mueller/Satur Farms Date: 5/15/02 § 58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1 , Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-1995 as L.L. No. 25-1995. Amendments noted where appHcable.] § 58-1. Providingnotiee of public hearing~. Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing theceon. The board or commission reviewing an application shall provide for the giving of notice: A. By causing a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. By requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by the town, which shall be prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the preporty involved in the application abuts, giving' notice of the application, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be eet back not more than ten (10) feet from the property line. ~he sign shall be displayod, for a period of not 1~ tb~- ~ven (~ d~ys immediately prickling the date of the public hearing. The applicant or h{~lher ~t shall ~e an affidavit that ~he has core_plied with thiz provision. C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owner~ of record of every property which 'abut~ and evory property which is across from any public or p~qvate street 5801 l-u-~ PAULETTE SATUR/EBERHARD MUELLER SATUR FARMS 1000-101-2-24.5 Site Plan for a new 4,100 sq. f. barn & a 1,105 sq. ft. roofed canopy equipment storage area. eMON.- JUNE 10, 2002- 6:00 P.M. PLANNING BOARD MEMBE BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 To: From: Re: James A. Richter, R.A. Office of Town Engineer Victor L'Eplattenier, Senior Plann~(/~---~ Satur Barn 3705 Alvahs Lane, Cutchogue SCTM: 1000-02-24 Date: May 13,2002 Please review the attached site plan for the proposed barn and covered truck storage area with respect to drainage and engineering issues. Please advise this office upon completion of your review. PLANNING BOARD MEMBEe BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To.' From: Re: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Victor L'Eplattenier, Senior Pla~.~ Satur Barn 3705 Alvahs Lane, Cuthogue SCTM: 1000-101-02-24.5 Date: May 10,2002 Please review the attached Site Plan for certification and advise this office upon completion. March 27, 2002 Southold Town Planning Board Town of Southold Post Office Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Satur Farms Site Plan New Agricultural Barn SCTM#1000-101-2-24.5 Gentlemen: The following documents are submitted to you in connection with the proposed construction of an agricultural building/bum on the above premises. 1. Site Plan Application with attachments. 2. Ou, l: check for $560.25, computed by Victor as the application fee. 3. ~ cop~es of the s~te plan. 4. Short and Long EAFs. Since this is an agricultural building in keeping with the current use on the property, we ask that the short form be accepted. Further, we believe this application is exempt from SEQRA as a Type II, (c) (1) barn. 5. Photos of adjoining buildings for submission to the ARC. Thank you for your consideration. Since the Building Department has not in the past required site plan approval of these types of structures, and we do not agree that the Code requires same, we make this application without prejudice to the Town's current position that a site plan is required. We very much appreciate, however, the efforts of the Planning Board and its staff to accommodate a swift review of this matter. Very t~s, Paulette Satur Southold Town Piannini] Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 10, 2002 Ms. Pauline Satur Satur Farms 3705 Alvah's Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: Muller / Satur Barn SCTM # 1000-101-02-24.5 Dear Ms. Satur, The Planning Board has received and approved the enclosed report from the Architectural Review Committee. It is being sent to you for your attention. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please contact this office. Senior Planner Encl. SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE March 28, 2002 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Robert t. Brown, Co-Chairman Howard G. Meinke, Cutchogue Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also present were Victor L'Eptattenier and Scott Hughes of the Planning Board. Staff, Diane Herold, Randall Goya of G & L Architects, and Ms, Pauline Satur. Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Robert Brown, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of February 14, 2002. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. ST. PETER'S LUTHERAN CHURCH (Main Road - Greenport) Ms. Herold described a 4000 square foot addition to the rear of the present structure for a fellowship hall and offices, the exterior to match the present of brick and stucco with white clad Anderson windows. Moved by Howard Meinke and seconded by Robert Brown, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the application with the CONDITIONS that catalogue cuts be submitted for any exterior lighting, that any air conditioning units be located out of view from the road and screened with landscaping, and consideration be given to raising the porch and foyer roof on the east elevation so that it would not be sitting on the roof of the offices and fellowship hall. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH ( North Road - Cutchogue) Ms. Herold presented a new sanctuary of gray brick and vinyl trim on all elevations, using Anderson double-hung windows. Moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the application awaiting catalogue cuts of the exterior lighting, details of the signage and railings and treatment of the roof penetrations that can be seen from the front. It was recommended that wood rather than vinyl be used on the front gables. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. SATUR FARMS (Alvah's Lane- Cutchogue) Ms Satur and Mr. Goya described a produce barn of contemporary design with a pine board and batten exterior on the four elevations. The Committee TO: FROM: RE: Memo to files Victor L'Eplattenier, Senior Planner Muller/Satur Barn 3705 Alvah's Lane Cutchogue, N.Y. SCTM: 1000-101-002-24.5 DATE: March 22, 2002 As of this date, no Site Plan for the above project has not been submitted. Inasmuch as the cutoff date for submitting the notice for Public Hearing is Tuesday AM, and the fee for the Site Plan has not been submitted, nor has the application been reviewed, it appears likely that the project cannot be heard on April 8,2002. Insufficient time remains for the Buildings Department and the Town Engineer to certify before that date. FARMS NORTH FORK OF L.I. ORGANIC Ebcrhard Miiller PROPOSED BARN BUILDING Satur Farms is an organic wholesale vegetable grower, with a wide variety of vegetable crops which are sold to the restaurant and retail trade locally and in the metropolitan area. Our 18 acre farm is exclusively devoted to this production. As our crops are perishable and must be shipped very fresh and with a day or so of picking, we need to streamline our operation in a central building close to our other barns. The 80,000 square foot parcel on which the new barn is to be located contains the Ibllowing other buildings, which have been designed to cluster the structures in a courtyard effect to maximize work efficiency and minimize built-up area: 1. Our principal residence 2. Former cottage, currently a farm accessory building used for seed-starting, storage, etc. 3. Existing barn and sheds, which were constructed years ago. These buildings now serve as our packing and shipping area, but are inadequate in size to handle our volume of production and to house our equipment. Most of this operation will be relocated to the new barn. We have proposed the location of the barn as shown so it is readily accessible to the other barn across the courtyard/driveway, and to leave the back of the property near the farmland open as we are using that for cropland. The proposed location is also level, and we want to keep the barn away from the slope to the rear northwest of the house. Roof and driveway drainage will be contained on site in drywells, and the wash water, which we are currently generating in the existing barn, will continue to be contained in drywells on site. We have retained an engineer to design these systems to adequate capacity. The new barn will be used for the following: 1. Basement: Potato cellar. First floor: Assembly of produce, washing and packing. Refrigeration will be self-contained, drop-in units. Shipping will then occur from the two front barn doors. 3. Roofed canopy in rear - to house tractors in an area where they are shielded from the front of the property. Subi~tission Wtthot~t a Cover Letter Dtzt~e: South. old Town Plaflmflg Board PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED /~ ROOFED CANOPYj- TRACTOR STO~A"GE AREA LINE ./. /-' ' ',iD O[ PROPOSED GRASS COVERED DRYWELL FOR BARN ROOF RUNOFF AND VEGETABLE WASH WATER ONLY. EXIST. WELL ,x~&- __ ...... ' PROPERTY OF MULLER / SATUR LOT AREA=80 005. B5 (1,857 ACRES) EX5 TERRA ;T~NG ---"' 'URAL WELL COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Real Property Tax Service, r~. ~ SOUTHOLD 101 ~:' ~ 1000 LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site PI SPFile Type: Approved Project Type: Site Plans Status: Final - Pendinq Inspection SCTM #: 1000 - 101.-2-24.5 Proiect Name: Satur Farms Barn Address: 3705 Alvah's Lane, Cutcho.que Hamlet: Peconic Applicant Name: Paulette Satur Owner Name: Paulette Satur Zone 1: A-C Approval Date: 6/11/2002 SCANNED iOCT - 2 ~0~ Records Manager OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 6/11/2002 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: Located at 3705 AIvah's Lane, Cutcho.que. SC Filin.q Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCAN Date: ans f. fi · ,-- ¢ ~ b ~ ~ D O ~ U OD ~ O ~XO < o 0 zO~ _ ~ ~ ' tl ~ , II , ~- TOP OF CONCRETE RETAINING WALL -- _ /&~'.,, ,- : - ._. , - - -- ~ o5 %., ;" I. I 20~ . , ~ __ _ TRACTOR STORAGE AREA FOOTINGS ? CONCRETE RETAINING WALL I1,1 0 I- I STAIR 1 I001 LPOTATO CELLAR UP 7 LLNE OF STAIRS ABO\VE 50'-0" CELLAR FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8"= 1'-0" and L ARCHITECTS 2002 DRAWN BY RG CHECKED BY RG ISSUE/REV. BATE DEPT OF BUILDINCS 1 FEB 02 DEPT OF BUILDINOS 6 MARCH 02 ARC REVIEW 28 MARCH 02 O L 158 FULTON STREET No. 5 NEW YORK, NY 10038 T 212 . 962 . 1292 F 212 . 962 . 1295 SATUR FARMS 5705 ALVAH'S LANE CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 CELLAR FLOOR PLAN BD1 .0 55' 3'" CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 0 RAMP DOWN 10 72 I101 IOPEN AREA 1 I 0 ~UP MTL STAIR AND HANDRAIL, PTD. SLIDING DOOR I- ISTAIR 2 I SLIDING DOOR )FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8"= 1' 0" DRAWN BY RG CHECKED BY RG ISSUE/REV. DEPT OF BUILDINGS BEPT OF BUILDINGS ARD REVIEW DATE 1 FEB 02 B MARCH 02 2B MARCH 02 G end L ARCHITECTS 158 FULTON STREET No. 5 NEW YORK, NY 10038 T 212 . 962 , 1292 F 212 . 962 . 1293 SATUR FARbIS 5705 ALVAH'S LANE CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 ,,0. ,,T FLOOR ,~N JBD1 1 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" DA~: 6 MARCH 2002 VERTICAL WOOD SIDING VINYL CLAD AWNIN~ WINDOWS, TYP. 58.25' ATTIC: FIN FL VERTICAL WOOD SIDING MTL RAIL AND STAIR - - 12 12 i8 ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF (~. 65.0' T~P OF RIDGE LINE OF CELLAR DOTTED BELOW CONCRETE RAMP COVERED CANOPY TRACTOR & RECEPTACLE STORAGE, WOOD POST, TYP --"')'" ~. 47.0' FIRST FLOOR: FIN FL 4 ,o' ELEVATION AT GRADE ~ 37.0' CELLAR' FIN FL NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4= 1'-0" 12 12 5 OPEN, TYP SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4= 1'-0" TOP OF RIDGE VERTICAL WOOD SIDING VINYL CLAD AWNINC WINDOWS, TYP, ,~/~58'25' ATTIC: FIN FL VERTICAL WOOD SIDING MTL RAIL AND STAIR 4.5.0' ELEVATION AT GRAD LINE OF CELLAR DOTTED BELOW CELLAR: FIN FL and L ARCHIIECTS 2002 DRAWN BY RD CHECKED BY RG ISSUE/RE% DEPT OF BUILDINGS DEPT DF BUILDINGS DEPT OF BUILDINGS DATE 1 FEB 02 06 MAR ~? 18 MAR O? C and L 158 FULTON STREET No. 5 NEW YORK, NY 100558 T 212. 962 . 1292 F 212. 962 . 1293 SATUR FARMS 5705 ALVAH'S LANE CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 D~: ELEVATIONS ~D3, ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT ROOF VERTICAL WOOD SIDING LINE OF CELLAR DOTTED BELOW SF -- OPEN '1 VERTICAL WOOD SIDING EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4= 1'-0" VERTICAL WOOD SIDING ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF LINE OF CELLAR DOTTED BELOW 12 12 ~11~65'0' ~ TOP OF RIDGEI 58.25' ATTIC: FIN ,~ 57.0' CELLAR: FIN FL I1~65.0' TOP OF RIDGE ~,~ 58.25' ATTIC: FIN FL e 47.0' FIRST FLOOR: -,_ r'~ 4,3.0' ' ~'~ ELEVATION ~., 37.0' CELLAR: FIN FL WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4= 1'-0" O 0 end L ARCHrTEDTS 2002 All rights reBerwd. The above dmwTng~, deal§ns, end Ideae embodied th.r.~ are the property of G and L Archltecta ond shall not be DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ISSUE/REV. DEPT OF BUJLDINGS DEPT OF BLJlLDINGS DEPT OF BUILDINGS RG Rg DATE 1 FEB 02 08 MARCH 02 1SMARCH 02 28 MARCH 02 C ond L 138 FULTON STREET No. 3 NEW YORK, NY 10038 T 212 . 962 . 1292 F 212 . 962 . 1293 SATUR FARMS 5705 ALVAH'S LANE CUTCHOGUE, NY 11955 DWG: ELEVATIONS R-19 BATT INSULATION ARCHITECTURAL GRADE-- ASHPALT SHINGLES ICE & WATER SHIELD ~ 58.25' ATTIC: FIN FL CONTINUOUS WOOD FASCIA CONTINUOUS VENTED SOFFIT 5 - 11 7/8" LVL HEADER VAPOR BARRIER 5 - 2x6 READER FLASHING WINDOW AS SCHEDULED VERTICAL WOOD SIDING R-19 BATT INSULATION 5/8" SHEATHING VAPOR BARRIER CONCRETE DIECKING P.T. 2x6 JOIST HANGER WITH -- WEB STIFFENERS CONTINUOUS FLASHING AT EDGE lJI 55 SERIES @ 16" O.C. ~ 43.0' ELEVATION AT GRADE ~ 57.0' CELLAR: FIN FL MEMBRANE WATERPROOFING 1/2" x 18" BOLT @ 48" 12" FROM CORNER 10" CONCREYE FOUNDATION WALL 2 - #5 REBAR @ --.. 1ST SNAP TIE "-. 2 #5 CONTINUOUS REBAR © 2' HT AND 8" HT. 3" CONC. SLAB W/6"x6" #1o/#~o WWM KEYED CONNECTION 5 #5 REBAR 4" PERFORATED DRAINAGE TILE WALL SECTION SCALE: 1" = 1'-0" end L ARCH[~CTS 2002 DRAWN BY RG CHECKED DY RG ISSUE/REV. DATE DEPT OF BUILDINGS DEPT CF BUILDIN$$ BEPT CF BUILDINGS 1 FEB 02 6 MARCH 02 28 MARCH 02 C and L ARCHITECTS 158 FULTON STREET ND. 3 NEW YORK, NY 100,38 T 212 . 962 . 1292 F 212 . 962 . 129,3 SATUR FARMS 5705 ALVAH'S LANE CUTCHODUE, NY 11925