HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-25.-2-13 (2)
.
.
WHEREAS, a petition was heretafore filed with the Town Board of the
Town af Southold by ......W.:!::q.J~...a,n.<:l..l3.~I.'.b.Il:r.!i...S.c;hr..i.El".ElI.'..........
requesting a change, modification and amendment of the Building Zone
Ordinance including the Building Zone Maps made a part thereof by chang-
ing ;:t; ..~U~1gnH~.ar.:~...... District to .~'.~."...~MRlp.~~.~............
District the praperty described in said petition, and
WHEREAS said petition was duly referred to the Planning Board far its
investigation, recommendation and report, and its report having been filed
with the Town Boord, and thereafter, 0 public hearing in relation to said
petition having been duly held by the Town Board on the ....J.5th......doy
of ...............N.<?y.~~'!?~f..............., 19..7.1., and due deliberation having been
had therean
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the relief demanded in said
petitian be, and it hereby is DENIED for the following reasons:
1. The requested change is inconsistent with the
Town of Southold Development Plan.
2. It is inconsistent with the residential pattern
of zoning and character of the area east of Tabor Road.
3. The resultant increase in traffic generation would
be potentially hazardous to children attending Oyster-
Ponds Untion Free School on the north side of Main Road.
4. The proposed change would constitute the unwarranted
extensive encroachment of business zoning into a residential
district and would be considered spot zoning.
DATED: December 20, 1977
BY ORDER OF THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD.
d . /' _______~
~<d'a7[ ~_/_ ----/--.e~.t~
;/ JuDITH T. TERRY t7
TOWN CLERK
-
..
.
November 28, 1977
Southold Town Board
Town Hall
Southold, N. Y. 11971
Gentlemen:
I want to thank all of you, and particularly Supervisor Martocchia
who chaired the meeting, for the courtesy extended to us at the Public
Hearing on our petition to establish a business district for Orient. I
feel that we were given every opportunity to make our presentation in
favor of the petition.
There are a few observations that I would like to bring to your
attention concerning the remarks of those who spoke in opposition. Fore-
most among them is the fact that not a single alternate site was proposed,
either for a busiRQSS district or for a new firehouse. Mr. Frank Fagan
did address himself to the question of whether Orient needed a business
district, though I don't share his conclusion that Orient will never be
able to support any retail businesses. Mr. Robert Douglass suggested
that the public would select the site for a new firehouse but made no
suggestions as to any possible sites from which to choose. It seems to
me that this reinforces our argument that Tabor Road is the best site
available, both for a business district and for a new firehouse.
I was so intrigued by Mr. William Y. Terry's remarks that I even
read the transcript to confirm what I had remembered. Although he did
not exactly offer his property as a possible site for a business district,
he certainly made an effort to defend its selection. While we believe
that our property is the best site for a retail business district, we
have no objection to Mr. Terry's property being zoned for business or
even light industry, When the Fire Commissioners proposed to purchase
his property as a site for a new firehouse, we offered to donate the
right-of-way for an access road to the rear of his property, and that
offer still stands. Also Mr. Terry's objection that granting our petition
would give us a monopoly on business property in Orient could be removed
by extending the business district to include a portion of his property.
If he were to make such a petition, I would be glad to speak in support.
.
.
November 28, 1977
Southold Town Board (continued)
As to the objection by the Orient Central Cemetery Trustees, the
only thing we have proposed on our property that might detract from the
appearance of the cemetery is the Orient Fire District tournament facility.
I Dlust admit that we selected a site along the eastern boundary of our
property for this facility because we felt that otherwise It would detract
from the appearance of the business district. So I can understand their
objection. However, Mr. Terry has been willing to provide a site for this
facility which the Fire Commissioners have found acceptable and to which
the Cemetery Trustees apparently have no objection. Since we have no
objection to locating this facility anywhere on Mr. Terry's property
and are quite willing to withdraw our offer to provide a site, It seems
to me that this problem can be resolved to the satisfaction of all four
parties concerned.
Mr. Tony Gloria has already spoken to me about obtaining additional
property at the rear of his lot. I indicated to him that we would be
happy to provide a strip along the south side of not only his lot but
also those of his two neighbors. Maybe this will help resolve some of
the objections of Mr. and Mrs. Ferreira. I am confident that some
arrangements also can be made by the Fire Commissioners in their plans
for the new firehouse to accomodate the Ferreira's as well.
When we made our proposal for a business district, we were quite
aware of the opposition we could expect and yet we felt that we had a
moral obligation to make the offer no matter what the outcome. As it
turned out, we had less opposition than we had expected. After all of
the publicity we had provided, a petition with about a hundred names on
it is hardly overwhelming. As I remember, there were several times that
many in opposition to our residential subdivision. What we did not expect
was the obvious reluctance on the part of the Fire Commissioners to
continue with their plans for a new firehouse. No doubt they find It
hard to accept such strong opposition from the community they are trying
to serve. Perhaps, by making this site available, we can revive their
interest.
~
.
.
November 28, 1977
Southo1d Town Board (concluded)
We really do believe that It Is absolutely essential to the future
of Orient that our proposal be adopted. And I believe we have demonstra-
ted the courage to fight for what we believe In even when we are con-
fronted with almost no visible public support. In the past, we have
supported you when we felt that you were making the right decisions In
spite of strong opposition. If you will remember, we supported your
plans for a new Town Hall even when they were certain to be defeated.
We supported your granting of the zoning for the KOA campsite, again in
the face of strong opposition. And we supported your plans to provide
for an east-west road along the north shore In Orient when you were being
opposed by many of the same people who are opposing us now. So you have
demonstrated the courage to make the right decisions even when they may
appear to be unpopular. And, In this case, there Is no possibility
that granting our petition could create a partisan Issue.
So the future of Orient Is now In your hands. Please take good
care of it.
il1~ ere1y our!!,', .
Illll' '- ~~
William W. Schriever
Box 128
Orient, N. Y. 11957
r
Or:--tober
, ,
-L L ~
lOT'
1harles Cuddy, Esq.
~s East Main Street
Riverhead, New York 11901
Dear Mr. Cuddy:
I am enclosing the recommendations of the Suffolk County
Planning Commission regarding the latest change of zone
application of William and Barbara Schriever.
Yours truly,
Muriel Brush, Secretary
Southold Town Planninp, Board
Copy to Mr. Schriever
Enclosure
.
.
OCT 11 1971
COMMISSION
Seth A. Hubbard
Chairman
Lee E. Koppelman
Director of Planning
-- .
Suffolk County Department of Planning
JOHN V.N. KLEIN. County Executive
Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, L. I., N. Y.
~
979-2918
October 6, 1977
Mr. John Wickham, Chairman
Town of Southo1d Planning Board
Main Road
Southo1d, N.Y. 11971
Re: Application of "William & Barbara Schriever"
(#234) for a change of zone on Parcel I* from
"A" Agricultural & Residence to "B" Light
Business, Town of Southo1d (SD-77-11).
Dear Mr. Wickham:
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County
Charter, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on October 5, 1977 reviewed the
above captioned application and after due study and deliberation Resolved to dis-
approve it because of the following:
1. It is inconsistent with the Town of Southo1d Development Plan which desig-
nates this area for Agricultural-Residence Development;
2. It is inconsistent with the residential pattern of zoning and character of
the area east of Tabor Road;
3. It constitutes the unwarranted extensive encroachment of business zoning
into a REsidence District;
4. It would tend to establish a precedent for further downzonings along Main
Road; and
5. The resultant increase in traffic generation would be potentially hazardous
to children attending Oyster-Ponds School on the north side of Main Road.
Very truly yours,
Lee E. Koppelman
Director of Planning
cc: MS. Judith T. Terry,
Town Clerk
byA~_A.~
Gerald G. Newman
Chief Planner
{2.
*The rezoning from "A" Agricultural & Residence to "B" Light Business On Parcel II
is not within the jurisdiction of the Suffolk County Planning Commission
-~~i!'1lll!u"~__
-,~--., -,.
"
.
Suffolk County Dept. of Planning
Veterlms Memorial Highway
HauPPlaugec NevI Yo:,:, 11787
GentlE~lLell ;
~1iolI,"';..-__., h.
,-
-'--C'-~~-"___T'""'_"_'~_c_'
.
8e~teMber 12, 1977
:;':nclosed olease find application #234 and map indlcA,t;j"p
land uses and zOning within 200 feet of the premiRes in regard
to t.he appJ.ic.~";ion of' l:11liam and Barbara Schriever .1'01" p.
change of' zone on property located on Main Road and Tabor Road
in Ori,ent, Town of Southold.
,
Er1closures 2
Yours truly,
Murie.l i Brush, Secr~ry
Southold Town Planning Board
".
.
.
Suffolk County Dep~rtrnent of Planning
H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Bu11cline
Veterans Herx>r1aJ. ;U":ht.ay
lI!lul'pauee, "3tT Yor!: 117rJ7
Town of Southold
Planning Board
September 8, 1977
hrtY~ RE: Application to
reZOne premises situated
~ on Main Road & Tabor Rd.,
Orient.
~.
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that pursuant to Sections 13~3 to 1332 of the Suffolk
County Charter, the above captioned a;>pllcation will not be reviet"erl. because
of noncompllance with requirements for notice ani MapS as stipulatei in
Informational Bulletin 1'10. 8 of the Suffolk County Plannin~ C.oAlllission. The
fo1lowine information will only he accepted ul'on submission throu,,:h the of,.,
fices of the municipal referrin~ a,,:ency'
Please submit a copy of the application and a map indicating land uses and
zoning within 200 ft. of the premises. Thank You.
Very truly yours,
.
Lee ~. ~oppe1MSn
Pirector of Plannin~
by JJ "....~_ /~
Geral" G. Newman
Chief Planner
"
/-"';'.N.,,,~
GGl\]: jlt
-
-.-> '~"'~ ~ . "-'."". ,..,...."..."
.-..
"
'''''' ..,~
----.,-.-..:==~..,.,.,..-:.
.
.
Dent ember 1. 1977
~~u:ff.;) ]
,... "T''\P
OUTV FlI"-,J1Ing Co,lIDDission
"'0'01'1:;' iU~war.
'. '; :'_:"1"')7 ..,~.~. 7,~ I
1.,"1
L, 1,:'; Ss-ctio!:l" 1323 to 13'12 of t;he Suff'olk County
'ew,'tH' th<: !"lannL!", 'Board of the Town of Southold hereby refers
' (' nt'Oposed, ~'''nini1; action to the Suffolk County
"I:,.f~t_::Lon :
'"':!~,~~l,L':1g .'1'lnp
tiOl! of affcc':ed' land - !1ain and ,Tabor :toads. Orient
"L thin lion f'(~et of State Route 2'5
Th:- PLenninr, Boerd of the Town of Southoldhas recoromendjE'nial
0'" 1'h" [l,Dplicati.on based on the following:
,
,
l'tf,;>:oning 0'1", thiJ'J l'ronerty would constt'Gtee spot zonIng.
:~. Improper USe of the, property because of potential traffic
hozard >'1'1 th I'!'t'l',ren'1e to Oysterponds Union Free School District.
,
.,".
It is inconsistent with the Southold Town development
" ~;n.
Yours 'truly,
MUX1$,..l Brush, Secretary
SOiltho ld Town Planning BO~d
., .
. , . .,,~~, . ','~
r .'-.,..,.~
~3eptilll1ber 1, 1 "17'7
.::':l.f'.rl :::: ,{". CU.
F: as ~-"1_'1:i 11
j,ve:r>::,€:ad , evt
.(~E,,~;
Street
Yor' 1190;).:'
. '.,.
C'ilddy
,~:\'. i :(,~lOn was taken by the Southold Tm'!J1 e1aEning
""'.1'>1".:: i 'le"leeti,rghe1d August 22 lCJ77.
'~' J..
. t():"ec)mmend to the Southold ''I'own Board denial of
y[ 'Iliilliam and Barbara. Schriever for ,J change of
situated at Orient, New York, from "A" Residential
District to "B" Light :Business D5"si;rict based or;
appl t "'E. ': j .-.,
')
zone :Yl'] nr;~nH:r":;-n
,.);1(,~ Ii.p,'I":"_~> r;.M~11
+- 'i.Q :fo -, owing:
.c. ':c,'?zoning of this property 'IlOuld constitute STIDt zoning.
;'. Improner USe otthe property. because of potential traffic
hazar.i ",ith ~"eference to Oysterponds Union Free School DiCJ'crict.
, It is Incons1st~nt with the South old Town development plan.
Yours truly,
Muriel ~ruShi Secretary
Southold Town Planning. Board
Copy '1".0 Mr. William Sohriever
-~,
~
:!i
:-;
~
.~
"
'1
~
!
='1
~
il
"
"'ii'
ii
j
~
~
~
~
~
l
I
"
~
~
~
"
..
-
.~
:.ii
'I
~
I
.
~
~
'iil
ii
11
"
:1l
~
!
T, TiliJilll .~'r
~-
"'
-, - -, .'~
.
IFL
.,.,.....,.,..,~.'"'"".~,...~~r--",...,.,.
.
September 1, 1977
'xL,'ho 15 ~~ow'n Board
T'T,
:},:.f:.~:ol "i
"I' Yor;~. 11)71
;~, ,?:ot l.erv:.n:
, 'cU.:nvin,O' action was taken by the Southold Town FIanning
"':'" '" meetin '~held August. 22. 1977.
EJ:';:r1f-V,;;D to reCommend to the Southold TO'WnBoard deniF\l of
tne app', j' ptiOD ,/?7,4 of William and Barbara Schriever for !3 change
of' zone or,':ro~"'ertYsit.tl!i\ted at Orient, Nel~Yorll:, :frO!t1""":N!'
Re~',dl?rlti",l, m:dAvricultural District to "BII 1..11';h;; Business
Dts.~:'tic':" based on -the following: '
1. Rezoninr of. ,11,;18 Pto~e:rltM>w,9uJd:Odn8t~ut':Rnot zOl~!.ng.
L~ . . '~,'" . . !~~;
:? Improper use Q'f'the PrQp.,ntY'Peoause crt' ~'q~tial b:"affic
hazard with reference to;'Oysterpontf.:.U1I0!iFiOee"'School Diwtt'ict.
It is 1ncone.ilJtenttli-thtthe oSol.\thold TCi>Wl\ developmmt
\'. "... ',1Ii.
'.1,:-:. _<
,
n,i.a~l.
""".,."
~:
Yours truly.,
~ ,~,4,
.?",
~.
\.. ,-
'\:'t,,:,"
""
! .
~
" ~~
Muriel Brush. Secreaary
Southold. T~ Planning Board
.
-'--~..-.--'~---~-'-'---'-~-----_.
~.
xxxx::oc
765-1938
June 30, 197'7
,,"
B08r~ 0.: ~0ation
r~ysteT"';~)::>.-l,::"' LJ ~ 'C' ~;3 ~ D.
jYl~,in F{f)?irj
'r:i "'1':- ,\f8\<1 York 11957
DB~U~ 3o~:;:ccl Nenihers:
Hr. "'ilU.am Schriever has made application for]. change
!~;-~
,., ~ :cone from "A" Agricultural and ResIdential to "B~: Business
(Llr;ht) direetly to the south across from the sChoo$' 0)1 Route
2~. This parcel contains an area of eight acres.
~,,;
...'>.....:0.....,
The Planning Board would appreciate your comme*-ts and
recomlllendations on this application as we would like to
dete~nine what impact it might have on the schOol.
Yours truly,
Muriel Brush,
Southold Town
SecretaI!lr
'.-r
Plann1n~,Board
,,,,-<
f,j: ;, ~.
j
~
ij
)'
i~
1
"
I'
I~
r
j
:
.
.
.
.
.
xxxxx:'C
765-19:58
June 14, 1977
Ms. Martha Terry
Orient Cemetery Association
Orient., New York 11957
Dear Ms. Terry:
We have had a petition for a change of zone of pro~erty
of W:llliam and Barbara Schriever presented to this board by
the ~ro'Nn Board for our recommendations.
We note that the property is adjacent to the Orient
lS' Cemetery and would appreciate having any comments from your
y,
association.
.
'.;.
Yours truly,
John Wickham, Chairman
Sou"bhold ;rown Planning,Board
JW/mb
"
.
.
COMMISSION
Setb A. ilubb.,d
Chairman
Lee E. Koppelman
Director 01' PJanning
Suffolk County Department of Planning
~t..
~..,:, CO~,,~
, ~~'0-'"
:.v,~' .,.'t.
.....7 ... ~
, ;'-J ~ ;;:;~
.,-<'.~f.rI
....j.'.~.,. .~., .~~
T: '''_ .r"J
.~~
JOHN V.N. KLEIN, County Encutive
Velera", Memorial Highway Hauppauge, L. I., N. Y.
724.2500
March 25, 1977
Mr. William W. Schriever
Main Road, Box 128
Orient, N.Y. 11957
Dear Mr. Schriever:
In response to your letter of loI-arch 22, 1977, please be advised that in
accordance with requirements of the Suffolk County Charter and policy of the
Suffolk County Planning COmmission, communications and other explanatory in-
formation pertaining to pending zoning actions must be submitted through the
offic,es of the local municipal referring agency.
Very truly yours,
~ &- Xrtf-L--
Lee E. Koppelman
Director of Planning
LEK:GGN:jk
cc: Supervisor
Town Clerk J
Planning Board
.
.
March 22, 1977
Mr. Lee E. Koppleman, Director
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Veterans Memorial Highway
Hauppnu~0, N. Y. 11787
Dear Nr. 1\.1.)\>1>1 0U1an:
Thank you for your letter of March 16, 1977, which defines tho legal
constraints that apply to private communications with the Suffolk County
Planning Commission. I remember trying to discuss my plans with the
Commission a few years ago and being told that they would only be considered
after an application was transmitted by the Town Planning Board. In this
case that condition was satisfied but I guess it was too late.
Today, my wife and I have submitted another zoning QPplication to the
Southold Town Clerk to provide for the remaining business zone necessary
to create the business district in the hamlet of Orient which was the main
subject of my letter of March 14, 1977. Clearly it is now too early to
discuss this application. But I would like to ask if there will be some
time when a new letter would be appropriate or whether my letter of March
It" 1977, could be reconsidered with the new application~
I have spent nine years accumulating the property and developing this
plan for a business district in Orient. The economics of the situation are
such that the time has come when the decision must be made. If my frustrations
don't show, I woul d be surpr i sed.
Town Clerk
/)f)~~lY I/),/s'/!J ~
1f/~~~c;Ic~
William W. Schriever
Main Road, Box 128
Orient, N. Y. 11957
Copies to:
Supervi sor
Planning Board
,.
.
.
COUMlSSlON
Seth A. Huhbud
CIuirm""
Lee E. Koppcl=n
DffmOf' of PI4#111;"Z
Suffolk County Department of Planning
JOHN V.N. KLEIN, COllnJy Exullti."
Velera1lJ Memorial Highway
HtZllppallge, L. I., N. Y.
979.2921
Mr. William W. Schriever
Main Road
Orient, New York 11957
March 16, 1977
Re: Application of "Wi.lliam and Barbara Schriever"
for a change of zone from "B" Light Business
to "c" Light Industrial, Town of Southold
(SD-76-16)
Dear Mr. Schriever:
In response to your letter of March 14, 1977, please be advised that
the decision rendered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission in letter of
November 4, 1976 was consistent with information submitted with the above
captioned zoning action.
The Suffolk County Planning Commission will only reconsider such zoning
action upon written request from: (1) any responsible Town official or his
designee when accompanied by specific new information; or (2) the Town Clerk
",-hen an amended or new application is filed.
In accordance with requirements of the Suffolk County Charter and policy
of the Suffolk County Planning Commission, no comments can be offered on other
contemplated rezonings in the locale until such time as an application has
been submitted through the office of the local municipal referring agency.
Very truly yours,
-~
,--r
dv- C
Lee E. Koppelman
Director of Planning
LEK:GGN:jk
cc: Supervisor
Town Clerk
Planning Board
.
.
Mr. Lee E. Koppleman, Director
Suffolk County Department of Planning
Ve,terans Memorial Highway
Hauppauge, N. Y. 11787
March 14, -1977
,
"
Dear Mr. Koppleman:
About the middle of April the Southold Town Board will hold a public
hearing on an application for a change of zone from "B", Light Business,
to "C", Light Industrial, on a parcel which my wife and I own on Tabor,
Road in Orient. Mr. Gerald G. Newman, in a letter dated November 4, 1976,
to the Southold Town Clerk has indicated that your Commission has decided
to disapprove our application. I am not ,sure whether the local law permits
me to correspond directly with you or whether there is any possibility of
the decision being reviewed, but the issue is so important that I am writing
to request such a review and I am enclosing a copy of the letter referred
to above.
The issue at stake here is much broader than the question of this
single application, and I feel that the entire proposal needs to be reviewed
and then this particular application decided in that context. I have
written a latter dated February 22, 1977, to the Southold Town Board which
outllnea the broad proposal and I am enclosing a copy of that letter for
your review. I am also enclosing a copy of a map dated August 31, 1973,
which details the area in question and describes the proposal which I
have made. The real question which I want to resolve is whether Orient
is to ever have any business district and, If so, is our property to be
that business district. If it is to be the business district, tben I
.
want the area appropriately zoned. If it is not to be the business district,
then I want to develop the entire area as residential. And I need the
matter resolved so that I can design the most efficient plan to accomplish
the ordered result. We cannot'continue to hold this property in its
present state. Should the business district be so limited in extent that
it detracts from the predominantly residential character, then I will
petition to have the present business area reduced to Include only the
parcel that Is the subject of the present application. That will stop
all future business development in Orient if that is what is desired.
~
,
.
.
March 14, 1977
Mr. Lee E. Koppleman (continued)
The subject oft~he present application is a half-acre parcel which
contains a building having 6,600 square feet of area on the ground floor
, and an additional one-acre parcel to the south which is vacant. My wife
has owned the half-acre parcel and building since 1969 and a variance has
been granted on it to use it for the Schriever Construction Co., Inc.,
an excavating and road construction business with many trucks and pieces
of heavy equipment. The building has been extensively remodeled and
improved but the work on it has not been completed because of the economics
of the construction business combined with our inability to sell a part
of our property. The one acre parcel waslpurchased by me in 1973 so as
to provide sufficient space for the storage of equipment next to the
bUilding. As a part of that purchase, the balance cf the vacant land
south of the building was acquired and my inability to dispose of at
le"st of part of this land is causing a financial hardship to the business.
At the present time I am involved in a new business with Mr. Roy W.
Latham of Orient, a professional engineer. We have formed a partnership,
Schriever and Latham, and a new corporation, Flightpath System" Inc.,
both of which we wish to locate in the office area of the building in
question. The partnership is an engineering and scientific firm
specializing in the application of computers. The new corporation is'
a particular application which involves using a computer together with
DME equipment to create a precision positioning system for aircraft.
Roy was the inventor of this system while employed at Grumman and we
are being licensed by Grumman to exploit the patent. It is becayse of
..
these businesses that we wish to change the zoning to the appropriate
classification. In addition I wish to extend the zoning to include
s~fficient parking area for the storage of equipment. If the new
businesses are successful, it seems likely that the excavating business
would be phased out. I would very much like to sell some of the land
and reinvest the money in the new business.
,
.
.
Mr. Lee E. Koppleman (continued)
March 14, 1977
In Mr. Newman's letter of diaapproval as previously mentioned, there
were four reasons given for the action and I would like to discuss them
" one at a time:
1. "It is inconsistent with the Town of Southold Development Plan
which designates this area for single family residence development." I
believe that someone made an error here since the property in question
and several acres to the south were zoned "B", Light Business, when the
Development Plan was adopted. The bUilding and the construction company
were in existence at the time. Were the argument based on such a fact,
then I should have drawn your attention to the fact that the Development
Plan and the Zoning Map are essentially identical. If all applications
for zoning were to be judged by such a standard, none would ever be granted.
Zoning is not an administrative function. If it were, it would be handled
by the Planhing Board.
2. "It is inconsistent with the pattern of zoning in the surrounding
area and therefore must be considered as "spot zoning"." It is to deal
with this objection that I am writing "to you now. It is a fact that the
parcel in question is a part of the only undeveloped business property
in Orient and the largest single area zoned business. If this is "spot
zoning" then the entire business area in Orient is "spot zoned", a fact
whi~h I happen to believe. And it is to correct this situation that I
have proposed a business district for Orient which can be made as large
as desired, up to 26 acres if you wish. I made this appplication to
Cover my immediate needs upon the recommendation of several peopie who
" ,
felt that a larger area would be less acceptable politically. I have
mad.. an offer to correct any "spot zonIng" which you feel exists, and
it the Town chooses "spot zoning" then I shouldn't be made to suffer
for it.
3. "It would tend to establish a precedent for further industrial
downzonlngs in the area." The only other developed property other than
two cemeteries that fronts on Tabor Road has a variance allowing its use
for another excavating bUSiness, a competitor of my construction company.
.
.
.
March 14, 1977
Mr. Lee E. Koppleman (continued)
If' two existing "C. zone businesses and the absence of any residential
use along Tabor Road are not sufficient precedent to grant my present
, application, then I fail to see any merit whatever to this argument.
This application, if granted, would not add any new use to the area,
it would only confirm an existing use.
4. "There appears to be ample available industrial zoned land
throughout the Town of Southold." Perhaps, but I don't see that that
has any bearing on this particular application. This is not an application
to construct a new facility. We alr.eady own this building and it is
being used for a "C" zone business. There exists a demonstrated demand
for such zoning in Orient as evidenced by the existence of six excavating
businesses in Orient including mine. They are Latham Sand and Gravel,
Roger Tabor, Bob Douglass (Orient Trucking and Construction), Roscoe King,
and the old yard of Eastern Excavating. In addition 'there are two
landscaping contractors with similar equipment, Joe Andrade and Gary Tabor.
Of these eight businesses operating heavy equipment in Orient, mine is
the, only one located on business zoned property. None are conforming
since mine is not properly zoned pending this application. And these
heavy equipment businesses located in Orient exceed in number all of
those throughout the remainder of the Town of Southo1d. There is a great
deal of industrial property in Orient that doesn't show on the Zoning Map.
Around the end of 1968, as I remember it, I applied for a change
of zone on the nine acre parcel across the street from the building in'
question. I wanted to erect a new building to house the excavat~ng
business. That application was approved by both the Southb1d Town
Planning Board and by the Suffolk County Planning Commission. It was
denied by the Southo1d Town Board. Subsequently the Development Plan
has designated this present parcel as business and the excavating
business has located in this building. In spite of this, the present
petition has been disapproved. These decisions are just not consistent.
.
, ..
.
.
March 14, 1977
Mr. Lee E. Koppleman (concluded)
As I said at the beginning of this letter, the main question that
must be resolved is the designation of a business district for Orient.
,
., If the parcel in question is to be a part of such a business district,
then I feel it should be zoned "C", Light Industry,for all of the reasons
given. If there is to be no signifi~ant business district, then I want
the area zoned residential so that I can proceed with development. This
building will be used to house these new businesses, either properly
zoned or as an extension of the non-conforming use.
I feel a moral obligation to provide for a business district for
,
Orient on a least a part of these twenty-six acres. Having made the offer
to all appropriate agencies of government and to the public, my responsibili-
ty is discharged as I see it whether it is accepted or rejected. My
intention is to develop into residential lots all property not designated
business by appropriate zoning. There will be three zoning applications
made of which this is the first. The second will be to zone the nine-acre
parcel "B", Light Business. The third will be to zone the area around th,
Town Sump as "B", Light Business. If all applications are denied, then
a fourth application will be made to zone the present business ar~a as
f'
"A" residential, that is all except for the parcel of this application.
Subsequently, the residential area will be mapped as house lots. It would
be nice if the Suffolk County Planning Commission would either support my
plan or offer a plan of its own. So far I have been unable to get any
help from the Town of Southald in developing a plan. That is the reason
I have had a resort to the procedure above to resolve this
Copies To:
. Town Clerk
Supervisor
Planning Board
Superintendent of Highways
Main Road
Orient, N. Y. 11957
323-2456
--------.~
~L ~
.
.
March 5, 1977
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Clerk's Office
Southold, N. Y. 11971
Gl!!ntlemen:
The Board of Commissioners of the Orient Fire District are presenting
to the voters a bond referendum on the purClhase of 3.8 acres of property
for a new fire house and teurnament facility. The property in question
consists ef a strip 200 feet in width running from the Main Road to the
main cemetery and is owned by Horace and William Y. Terry. In the C1ase
of' Will iam Y. Terry, this sale represents a continuation of the subdivision
of' his 30 acre pareel for which there has never been any approved plan
fer subdivisien.
The aspect of this sale which concerns me is~hat no consideration
has ever been given to the provision for a road connecting Tabor Road
with Platt Road. Once this property is acquired by the Orient Fire
District it will be difficult to arrange for the transfer to the Tewn.
It seems to me that this sale constitutes a subdivision of the property
of William Y. Terry and therefore is subject to the approval of the
Planning Board. There have been repeat~d casual sales from Mr. Terry's
parcel over the years but nene having the impact on future dpvelopment
that this sale represents. Practically, it will completely block access
between Mr. Terry's property and that of my wife.
In two letters to the Board of Fire Commissioners, one dated October
6, 1976, and a second dated October 16, 1976, I have offered to provide
for a Town road just north of the main cemetery which would connect with
the south end of the property being acquired by the Orient Fire District.
Neither of these two letters were answered. The only discussion of' a
road that I have heard in connection with this property has been a mention
of Mr. Terry providing fer a road just east ef the proposed purchase and
connecting with the Main Road. Ne mention was made ef the ultimate
cennectien of this road with any other road, existing er proposed. I
questien whether the State ef New Yerk will permit anether entrance so
elose to Tabor and Platt Reads. It seems te me that cnother entrance
"euld be undesirable frem a traffic peint of view though I have no personal
obJection to it.
.- ..
---"'~."'''''r~'-' -
.
.
March 5, 1977
Southold Town Planning Board (continued)
I share the concern of the Board of Fire Commissioners in trying to
make provision for the future location of a new fire house for Orient.
It is not my intention to raise any objection to the location they have
selected nor to interfere in any way with the bond referendum that will
b,. put before the voters ef Orient later this month. The thing that I
do object to is the transfer of a parcel of this size without any formal
consideration of the impact it may have on the future development of
Orient.
If this same parcel were being put to private use, whether residential
or commercial in character, some provision would have to be made for
a<:cess to the property and for the flow of traffic across it. Although
the construction of the fire house is probably outside the control of
the Town, the subdivision of the Terry property is clearly subject to
approval by the Planning Board. As a minimum, it sheuld be treated as
a minor subdivision. Under the interpretation that applies to most of
us, a major subdivision of the entire parcel should be dealt with. All
I am asking is that the rules for a miner subdivision be applied to the
ex.tent necessary te define the access roads.
Since no plans even exist for the construction of any facilities on
this property, no delay will occur in the development of this property
as a result of the time required to process this subdivision. Nor should
it have any effect on the bond referendum. But I believe it sheuld occur
before the transfer of the parcel to the Orient Fire District. I base
this on my understanding of the difficulty of transferring property out
of the ownership of the Orient Fire District once it is acquired.
As an alternative, I would accept a provision in the deed to the
Or:lent Fire District which would I>I!0vide for dedication to the Town of
a 50 foot ROW on the south end of the parcel.
q(JE~:ii~
William W. Schriever
Box 128
Orient, N. Y. 11957
.
.
.
r
February 22, 1977
$outho1d Town Board
16 South Street
Greenport, N. Y. 11944
Gentlemen:
On August 13, 1976, my wife and I filed a petition for a change of
"one on a parcel fronting on Tabor Road in Orient. Later, after it became
apparent that some matters having " significant bearing on our petition
",nuld rem:\ln unresnlveod nt thf'l lime of L:he puhlic h('lnrlng, we requested,
through our attorney on October 20, 1976, thut the public hearing be
postponed. At this time I believe that the outcome of most of these
matters is sufficiently well determined, if not resolved, so that we
should proceed with the public hearing.
At this public hearing I expect that I will have ample opportunity
to deal with matters directly related to this petition. However, I would
like to take this opportunity to discuss with you a fundamental decision
which I feel must be made before this petition can be acted upon fairly.
And that fundamental decision is the location, nature, and extent of
the future business district in Orient.
As you know, my wife and I have purchased all of the vacant frontage
along Tabor Road in Orient. In 1968 we made a decision to locate the
Schriever Construction Co., Inc., along Tabor Road and in 1969 an existing
building on the west side and a nine acre parcel on the east side of
Tabor Road were purchased following approval of a variance to use the
building for such purposes. Earlier we had petitioned for a change of
zone on the nine acre parcel but that petition was denied. Subsequently,
ul~n the adoption of the Master Plan, the frontage on the west side of
Tabor Road was zoned for business.
Based upon these facts, I have copc1uded that Tabor Road was selected
by both the Planning Board and the Town Board as affording the best
location for a future business district for Orient. I feel that the
d"cision was the correct one for many reasons. It was and still is the
only street in the village that is completely free of residential frontage.
It is well located in relation to the highway and to such community
facilities as the school, the fire house, the churches, and Poquatuck
-1-
. .
.
.
~
r~bruary 22, 1977
Southold Town Board (continued)
Hall. It can be widened inexpensively and it can be extended to King
Street to divert traffic from Village Lane.
Assuming that I have drawn the correct conclusion concerning the
location of the business district, the parts of that decision that
r,emaln are the nature and extent of the business district. My wife and
I would like to 'gain approval for an overall plan to develop our
property along Tabor Road so that we can begin to dispose of some of
the property. And your decision on the nature and extent of the business
dlstrict is essential to that plan.
Your approval of my application for a cluster subdivision togeth~
with the approval of a variance to use the lot on the corner of Tabor
Road and Orchard Street for residential purposes seems to me to define
the western arid southern bounds of the business district, at least in
so far as it affects our properties. Since any further residential
development west of Tabor Road would require residential frontage on
Tabor Road, I plan to apply for a change of zone to light business for
the property around the Town Sump on the west side of Tabor Road.
Our decision on the development of the nine acre parcel east of
Tabor Road has been held up for several years pending a possible sale
of a part of that parcel to the Orient Fire District. This winter the
Board of Fire Coromi ssioners Q.!lve made their decision to purchase a
parcel just east of our nine acre parcel owned by Horace and William
TE!rry. On January 4 the voters defeated the bond issue for that purchase.
The same proposition will be voted on again on March 23, 1977. Clearly
WE! have no further obligation to the Orient Fire District and we must
make other plans for the development of the nine acre parcel.
This nine acre parcel is bounded on the north by the Main Road
and fronts across from the school. It is bounded on the south by the
cemetery. Its frontage along Tabor Road is opposite business zoned
property. And now it appears that it will be bounded on the east by
the tournament facilities of the Orient Fire District. Clearly this
nine acre parcel is cut off from any residential area other than the
-2-
"
.
.
February 22, 1977
Southold Town Board (continued)
three existing homes along the Main Road that are trapped with it. I
can see no logical argument for continuing to plan on the residential
development of this parcel.
Since the tournament facility, if not the fire house itself, of
the Orient Fire District is obviously of an industrial nature, the
eastern bound of the business district is not yet established. But
the eastern and northern bounds of the business district as it affects
our property seems to me to be determined. I hope that you gentlemen
will concur in my conclusions as to the bounds of the business distrfct.
It is crucial to the future of Orient that the decision be made now So
that the necessary property can be set aside.
The final part of the decision has to do with the nature of the
business development which will be required in the future. In drawing
conclusions as to the future I believe it is essential to consider the
constraints that will be applied by the energy shortage. For one thing,
it seems obvious that even in my lifetime the automobile as we know it
will become so expensive to operate that it will become a luxury. Thete
is no question in my mind that suburban sprawl wlll become a thing of
the past, notwithstanding the efforts of our local governments to preserve
it. We will have plenty of open space, not by government decree but as
a result of practical economics. Public transportation will become
essential to the working class to survive. And shopping facilities will
have to become centrally located within the residential communities to
survive. For these reasons we must have a business district in Orient
that our residents can reach without an automoblle. And it will have to
bE' sufficient to serve all of their dally needs.
Since our present zoning regulations and health code effectively
prohibit the type of retall shops that have served our country for two
hundred years, a shopping center is essential to provide space for small
retail shops that would otherwise be economically prohibited. In
addition we will need separate parcels for a branch bank, a post office,
ar.est:auran't or two, and shops for the tradesmen of the community. And
we should provide space for professional offices and as many small
-3-
,"
.
.
February 22, 1977
Southo1d Town Board (continued)
industries as we can attract to provide employment and an economic base
for our community. As the energy shortage becomes more severe, our whole
standard of living is going to continue to "drop and the tourist industry
is certain to decline. And besides, the tourist industry provides only
seasonal unskilled jobs for our residents; jobs that are just one notch
above that of a migrant farm worker. We are going to need skilled and
professional jobs to build a viable economic base for our future. It
seems unlikely that Orient can attract many small industries, but the
Town of Southo1d certainly can. Roy W. Latham and I are starting a
new industry in Orient that will provide a few jobs for highly-trained
technical people, so it can happen.
The zoning that will be required to develop the business district
will ultimately be a combination of "B", "B_1", and "C". Practically,
the whole area could be zoned "C" without the Town giving up any control
over the development of the area since every use beyond "B" requires a
Special Exception. On the other hand the lot sizes increase from ha1f-
acre for "B" to one-acre for "C" so that downzoning beyond what is
r..quired wastes space and causes unnecessary expens.. Thus it seems
to me that some type of balance in the zoning is going to be necessary
eventually. For now I would be satisfied if the majority were zoned
"B" so that it can be set aside as business property. My wife and I
have applied to have the existing shop building and an adjacent one-
acre parcel zoned "C" because I feel that that building has no practical
use in a "B" zone, which is the present status. It would have use in
the "B_1" zone as an automotive garage or automotive sales facility but
I feel that Orient is just not a location which could attract that type
of facility. The only uses which I feel are practical in Orient for
that building are as a garage for heavy equipment, which is its present
use, or as an industrial building for light manufacturing or research
and development. These are all in the "C" zone. I would not object if
the "e" zone were extended for an additional acre to the south.
-4-
.
.
February 22, 1977
Southold Town Board (continued)
To complete this discussion, I would like to review the public
facilities that '1 have already proposed. My wife and I have offered to
donate to the Town an additional 20.5 feet, on average, bordering Tabor
Road throughout its length to provide for widening it to a 70 foot ROW
so that it can be paved, ultimately, to a width of 50 feet. Originally
I had proposed to undertake most of the road construction at my own
expense providing the Town would surface the road. After we had apparently
r,esolved our differences on the drainage which I was going to donate, the
offer was rejected because of the expense of the surfacing. Finally I
offered to donate the property with no strings attached as to the
construction of the road. This offer has not been accepted. I feel
that the Town should accept the offer while it is still possible. It
is interesting to note that the Planning Board's own code on the Sub-
division of Land, Section Al06-33, requires an 80 foot ROW for a Secondary
or Collector Street, which is exactly what Tabor Road will become when
it: is extended to King Street. And yet your objection has been that a
70 foot ROW is too wide. Aside from the traffic problem, one of my
concerns is that the Town may f.ind the narrow street a basis for re-
j"cting some project along Tabor Road in the future. Isn't one Village
Lane enough.
My proposal to build a subdivision street connecting Tabor Road
with Village Lane received a great deal of attention. Again quoting
from the Planning Board's own code on the Subdivision of Land, Section
AI06-32, "The arrangement of streets in the subdivision shall provide
. ,.. for proper projection of such streets into adjoining properties
in order to make possible necessary fire protection, movement of traffic
and construction or extension, presently or when later required, of
ne,eded ut i li ties and public services, such as sewers and water dra inage
facilities." As you know I w'lnll to great expense to provide for the
extension of this street to Village Lane for all of the good reasons
quoted above only to have my efforts discouraged.
-5-
.
.
.
!""hrullry 22, 1977
Southold Town Board (Continued)
On the west side of Tabor Road, across from the cemetery, is a
gravel-filled sump, half on the Town's property and half on mine. Not
only is the sump an eyesore but it is so high in elevation that it cannot
be used to provide drainage for the surrounding property. I have offered
to provide other, and better, drainage facilities to substitute for this
sump, first as a part of the widening of Tabor Road and later as a part
of the drainage of the subdivision. Certainly there is some substitution
that can be made for this sump that is acceptable to the Town.
In conjunction with the development of the Orient Fire District
property, first as a part of my offer to the Board of Fire Commissioners
dated October 6, 1976, and later in conjunction with the development of
the Terry property in a letter dated October 16, 1976, I have offered
to donate to the Town of Southold a parcel fronting on Tabor Road and
extending to the Terry property sufficient to construct a parking lot
for the use of any businesses in the area, the school, and the fire house.
The condition was that the parking so provided would count toward any
parking required for the businesses. Obviously the nine acre parcel would
have to be zoned for business. Also offered to the Town of Southold
w"s a 50 foot ROW along the north side of the cemetery providing the Town
would construct a public road to its own specifications. Both of these
public facilities would provide a more direct access to the fire house
and greatly increase parking where it is most needed. I assume that
you are aware of these proposals. It is my understanding that William
Terry is proposing a 50 foot ROW just east of the fire house and I would
hope that these facilities would connect with that through the property
of the Orient Fire District.
After you have discussed this plan among yourselves, I would very
much like to meet with you to see if we can reach some conclusions. If
there were some way to bring the plan in its totality before a public
hearing, I would take that action. However, the power to do this lies
with the Planning Board in a revision of the Master Plan as nearly as
I can figure out;
-6-
.
.
.
"
February 22, 1~77
Southold Town Board (concluded)
If Tabor Road is the designated business district for Orient, then
l.t seems to me that our petition for a change of l'ione should be approved,
As we both know, the existing variance creates a non-conforming use, and
Section 100-118 of the Zoning Code provides for the conversion of a non-
conforming use to another use of the same or higher classification. Unless
the building is destroyed or the present use is abandoned, the building
and the smaller parcel are essentially zoned "C" now. The main purpose
of the petition is to extend the existing use to the one-acre parcel to
the south which was not included in the variance since I didn't own it
at the time. I should also point out that with the addition of the
parcel on the south, the property becomes conforming in area to the
requirements for the "e" zone. The building does not conform in setback
but the widening of Tabor Road, as proposed, will add 15 feet to the
setback which will be very helpful.
If Tabor Road is not to be the designated business district for
Orient, then I certainly need to reassess my plans for the development
of our property. That decision needs to be made before I reapply for
approval of my subdivision and I hope that that will be soon. Can't
we resolve this problem?
^~e~e~ YJ'ur~!1 .
l//~~~-;;S-
William ~chrillVer
Copies To:
Town Clerk
Superintendent of Highways
Planning Board
-7-
JUDITH T. TERRY
T OWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
.
TELEPHONE
765-3783
April 13, 1977
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold, New York 11971
Gentlemen:
Transmitted herewith is petition of William and
Barbara Schriever requesting a change of zone from
"A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light
Business District on certain property at Orient, New
York.
You are hereby instructed to prepare an official
report defining the conditions described in said petition
and determine the area so affected with your recommenda-
tions.
Very truly yours,
~~~r--.
Judith T. Terry
Town Clerk
"
Mr. 'ili11iam Schriever
Main Road
Oriell1t, New York 11957
Dear y~. Schriever:
.
~~
'.-,-,.",
.-'"
.
April 8, 1977
I presented the Planning Board with your question of
starting to ,preplU'e maps' for a subdivision on proper1t~...or
which you have made apPlication for a change of zone.
The Board
pend:lng at the
"',~- ,.
was .i:n.ilJ;~eem~nt
salle time on the
that two actions, cannot
"-,: ,.'
sam~ piece of property.
be
Yours trulY~
Muriel B1'"\1Ilh, Seof-tary
,.'~
.
COM:MlSSlON
Seth A. Hubh.ard
Ch.iJirman
Lee E. Koppelman
Dir~ctor of Planning
.
.
Suffolk County Department of Planning
JOHN V.N. KL~IN. County Executl.,
Vetera... Memorial Highway HauppaUlfe, L. 1., N. Y.
979.2920
'.
November 4, 1976
'\
Mrs. Judith T. Terry, Town.Clerk
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Application of "William and Barbara
Schriever" for a change of zone from
"B" Light Business to "c" Light Indus-
trial, Town of Southold (SD-76-l6)
Dear Mrs. Terry:
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County
Charter, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on November 3, 1976 reviewed the
above captioned application and after due study and deliberation Resolved to
disapprove it because of the following:
1. . It is inconsistent with the Town of Southold Development Plan which
designates this area for single family residence development;
2. It is inconsistent with the pattern of zoning in the surrounding area
and therefore must be considered as "spot zoning";
3. It would tend to establish a precedent for further industrial downzonings
in thE' area; and
4. There appears to be ample available industrial zoned land throughout the
Town of Southold.
\.
Very truly yours,
.
.
Lee E. Koppelman
Director of Planning
GGN:fp
ce: Planning Board
byA~~~~
Gerald G. Newman
Chief Planner
- _,;~;o-=~.. -- =-__,__"....__
.
-----.--...--...--.
.