Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-22.-3-19 (2) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS • ��g�FFO(,t CD &own Hall, 53095 Main Road BENNETT O1 OWSHI,JR. =.j.0 �/y� P.O. Box 1179 Chainnan C3 -< Southold, New York 11971 WILLIAM J.CREMERS y Z Fax (516)765-3136 KENNETH L.EDWARDS W GEORGE RITCHIE LATH",JR. �'� Telephone(516) 765-1938 RICIURD G.WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 6, 1999 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Gazza, Grundbesitzer Corp., and Lettieri Property SCTM# 1000-22-3-19, 20, 21, 22 & 1000-31-5-1.2 Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 5, 1999: WHEREAS, in 1993, Joseph Frederick Gazza, Andrew Lettieri and Bernice Lettieri filed applications for subdivision approval on the following properties: SCTM# 1000-22-3-19: 2 lots proposed on 4.9 acres; SCTM# 1000-22-3-20: 2 lots proposed on 4.0 acres; SCTM# 1000-22-3-21: 2 lots proposed on 5.4 acres; SCTM# 1000-22-3-22: 3 lots proposed on 6.3 acres; SCTM# 1000-31-5-1.2: 3 lots proposed on 10.67 acres; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 1993, the Planning Board issued a Positive Declaration on each proposal, noting that the five (5) subdivision projects were pending in the same geographic area and that the five (5) projects would involve common and potentially significant impacts; and WHEREAS, the five (5) proposals have been dormant since the issuance of the Positive Declaration; and WHEREAS, as per letters dated April 5, 1999, March 10, 1999, and March 8, 1999, Joseph Frederick Gazza, Andrew Lettieri and Bernice Lettieri notified the Planning Board that they wished to withdraw the five (5) subdivision applications; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board withdraw the subdivision applications for SCTM# 1000-22-3-19, SCTM# 1000-22-3-20, SCTM# 1000-22- 3-21 and SCTM# 1000-22-3-22, and SCTM# 1000-31-5-1.2. • • Page 2 Gaga, Grundbesi zer Corp., and Lettieri Property April 6, 1999 Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, z x Bennett Orlowski, Jr. s Chairman cc: Zoning Board of Appeals Town Trustees THIS 'VIINOR SUBDIVICICill ISS>FOR, LOTS ON -ACRES LOCATED ON —rn! - s i��3 �- ii..crl IN - SCTtiI# ho00- MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAC ) Complete application received Application reviewed at work session OK INTO. uOL OK Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received OK I„ro. Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination w s ¢ s _ _ 3 -� SEQRA determination 1 L)c c- , Sent to Fire Commissioner _ Receipt of firewell location _ Notification to applicant to include on final map Sent to County Planning Commission - ro.` OK Receipt of County Report ro.` 07K Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received _ „ro. OK 11 Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed „W. 07K Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions Endor semcnt of subdivision. 14-16-2 (2187)-7c •. r 617.21 SEOR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. • A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions PRO POSEn S'V6d• A r,o J eF LANo.r re rvA /ir EAST MARtc t/ Name of Action lDoo- o22.O& al9 Name of Lead Agency -- Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsi ( Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If differen reFgctrlsiplQ UUCCI�, 7r) Date SOUTHOLD TOwN 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considers as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involv new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specif each instance. NAME OF ACTION PRCPor o S,)bdiv/.r.d,j C 4/1,1109 .r,rva7rr LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address,Municipality and County( A: rA d7 MAR jo,tJ All S)p A -V Rr 2y 1862 Fr. E/o NAME SOR Sr 'r'j, - ra N YS BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS ATTORY-^' - AW P. O. SoX 969 5 OGD NIT CITY/PO W YORK 11obY (St6)6S.�S7B$ STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER(It different) ps..,,. BUSINESS TELEPHONE C ADDRESS . ;UMERICIC C ATTORNEY-AT- aZZ~ CITY/PO �OGU , 5 OLDEN INE E,NEW YORK Iipgp STATEZip CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION I,5` NO Pu--IrO ..f',4& Clivi.�rj c,F VACA: 7- L Fl� :.v7o 2 Rle�',or,✓rs.,1c cars J0oo - OZ-L- 07- 0 k 9 Please Complete Each Question Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ItRUral (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 51s- acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION �" 9tr acres 'f. 'j Forested acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, acres 0 acres P pasture, etc.) �0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) y IF acres Water Surface Area acres --------------V_ acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) [1 acres p acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres 0 acres Other (Indicate type) © acres --� acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? SAVOacres a. Soil drainage: Well drained /0() 0 `� GRAVFeI_ /o of site ❑Moderately well drained o ❑Poorly drained % of site /a of site b. If any agricultural land is involy d, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS` Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes ONO a. What is depth to bedrock? N. A. (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: WO-10% Z % ❑10-15°4 % ❑15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes ENO 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Oyes ENO 8. What is the depth of the water table? Jr2`j" (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Ill ONO 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? 1*Yes ONO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Oyes BNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes ®No Describe , 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes IONo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes ®No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Al, a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary, _ 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: f, a. Name 0ArN 110nl0 b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes ONO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes ONO b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Eyes ONO 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Oyes ONO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Oyes ONO 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Oyes ONO B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor O acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 4 acres initially; s!b 4' 0'' acres ultimately. � c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 7S� Orc L UJ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: Al A- (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed /V• A, %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N. A. proposed N. A. g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 2 - 3 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple I amily Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 30 height; 60 width; 60 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 5-161 It. p.0.W• �N7n CE 3 • 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? tons/cubic yards Dyes ONO QN/A a. If yes, for what intend_ purpose is the site being reclaimed? Al //d b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO RE ­3'"DD aF ow aoo C. Will u RGOlme.mrNr w.+H Tbt Apr;z,,00 RoAo. upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? y/2 5. Will an mature forest over 100 ears old) or other local) im ortant vegetation be removed b this project?ect Y ( Y Dyes ONO y p g Y project? 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 9 months, 7. If multi-phased: (including demolition). a. Total number of phases anticipated N- Fl. (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 + 19F'Fy' month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase I month 1 98£3 d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes QNo year. 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes QNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 12- after project is complete O 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project O 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes ®No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ®No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes ❑No Type Simi'TAR y 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes QNO Explain EN�AE Pao Mir rfrT fSA'yC 0C.L Icc `r 15. Is project or an project y �� fil yes�G �'jj0"�'` 3r'fly y portion of located in a 100 year flood plain? '®Yes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes RNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month 0 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONO C. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes e. If Yes, explain QNO 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ®NO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? Al.A. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? /V.R, tons/month. years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes ®No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes QNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes QNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? wyes ONO If yes , indicate type(s) T=f-Pc1k!C A2.,M L/L[p 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity IS 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 2S gallons/minute. galluns/day. Pka O wJFcc:"' 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding?•. C1 Yes If Yes, explain QNo ,i 4 25. Approvals Requires_. submitta Type Dare City, Town, Village Board Dyes WNo QW, ------ f✓CLD IW�roN 1986 _ , Town, uMI/Jch' illege Planning Board ®Yes ONO -- City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ®No Fitp, County Health Department ®Yes ONO SAAv,•rna7 4 svt3DWr nen/ i 9810 Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ONO Other Regional Agencies Oyes ONO State Agencies O6c N4-r ®Yes ONO N yrT.w_ PFR1•+ it \ 987 Federal Agencies ❑Yes ONO C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning ec.aew decision? 9Yes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit subdivision ❑site plan ❑newlrevision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Rg.riOF.ir,At_ Z A-` Z"w)N(' 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? La,Y Ar 2 A 04cH A. What is the proposed zoning of the site? RgS,PtFNriAL 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? rA ME C 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? MYes ONO 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/. mile radius of proposed action? R12.r10 gm- mill-8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/. mile? Eyes ONO 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 2 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ®No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Wes ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? 11Yes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes VIN a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts�rant] the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. .PEE re—Po-da 2 �. Mroe n 6 qo/t ,, ., F� 7-/b - I E. Verification I certify that the inform ion provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor e JOS(MN r0.GPTa,tk CoA-Z714 Date Signature Title OWnFi` /fMr- dprL•, n .r /49721, ^" If the action is in the Coa a A a, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessme )I GAZA► 5 ATTORNEY-AT-LAW P.M BOX 969, 5 OGDEN LANE WOGUE, NEW YORK 11959 (516) 653.5766 µ,.ms>.....w Part 2—PROJEIMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNIODE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. nI ] 3Can Impact BeIMPACT ON LAND Mitigated ByWill the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Project ChangeExamples that would apply to column 2WN0 ❑YES • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed ❑Yes ❑No 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than3 feet. ❑Yes ❑No • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles.• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally withinDyes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ than one phase or stage. ❑ 13 Yes ❑No • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. - El ❑Yes ❑No • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. 11• Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect t� ...ry un,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ONO DYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential ,Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. 1:1 El ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10°' increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No C • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ El ❑Yes LINO gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ 11 Dyes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveye.l off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per El ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ElEl ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical El El ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ElEl Dyes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: F-1 El Dyes ❑No G Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0No 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated BJE1YesC1No Impact Impact • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑• Other impacts: ❑❑ ❑ IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 ANO OYES • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. ❑ ❑ Dyes []No • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ❑ 11 ❑Yes ONO • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONo • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Other impacts: O ❑ Dyes ONo IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8_ Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 (ANO ❑YES • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ 11 ❑Yes ONO • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ 13 []Yes ONO than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ O ❑Yes ONO 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 %NO OYES • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑ ❑ 11 Yes ONO • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important O O ❑Yes ONO vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? Examples that would apply to column 2 $INO OYES • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) O ❑ ❑Yes ONO It 8 nP,oten 2 3tial Can Impact BeLarge Mitigated Bympact Project ChangeConstruction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑Yes ❑Noagricultural land. ❑ ❑Yes ❑NoThe proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land ❑ ❑Yes ❑No• The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No • Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO ❑YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21., Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. ❑ • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of 1-1 Eyes El No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their f enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? NNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ project site. ❑ • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑Yes []No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 14fNO ❑YES t • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ '❑ ❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ Cl Dyes ❑No 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION y 2 3 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By ANO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action will result in major traffic Yes ❑No problems. ❑ ❑ ❑ • Other impacts: Yes ❑No❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ any form of energy in the municipality. ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family ❑ ❑Yes ❑No residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ facility. ❑ El Yes ❑No • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ❑ El Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ noise screen. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 41NO DYES • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of ❑ Dyes ❑No accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, ❑ ❑Yes ❑No infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural 11gas or other flammable liquids. ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ❑ El Dyes ❑NO waste. . _ • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 10 EModerate FIrnpact 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Can Impact BeOF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Project Change ®NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑Yes ONO project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. 11 ❑Yes ONO • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. ❑ Eyes ONO • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ El ❑Yes ONO • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services 1:1 El ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ El Eyes ONO • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ El ❑Yes ONO Dyes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or f If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 617.2.1 Appendix B SEAR S t,:te Environmental Quality Review Visual EAS' Addendum Fthe his form may be used to provide additional information relating to Qu73.55+ ll EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) ity Distanc Project and Re 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-1/a /4-1/z • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural El or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Registers of Historic Places? ❑ • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? NIA ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? 1'11A ❑ 13 El El El• National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding11 El natural features? 91a ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Park Service lands? Nin ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? N!A ❑ ❑ • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? WiA El El • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ [] ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for or establishment or designation? N1A • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ scenic? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ • County road? El ❑ El IR ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? N4J "rtr 25— `/np,,,i Bono) ❑ ❑ • ® El 13Local road? ❑ IP ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ®Yes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year C during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes OlNo 1 .J DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *1/4 mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped El Forested ❑ Agricultural N/Q ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial N/A ❑ ❑ Commercial /A ❑ ❑ Urban N/A ❑ River, Lake, Pond DPr Pow ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks MA ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space N/R ® ❑ Flat ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous NfA ❑ ❑ Other NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: "/2 mile []Yes ❑No '1 miles ❑Yes ❑No '2 miles ❑Yes ❑No '3 miles []Yes ❑No ' Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE M tJ;r nL to observe the proposed project is 6. The annual number of viewers likely NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ® ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence is ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other El 11 El El 2 i wra 'ZI PLANNING BOARD MEMB: '+ •,• 00%S GZA, +o.�. Cr7 .,� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. '.t.0" (/ -• _ Chairman yf P.O. Box 1179 WILLIAM J. CREMERS w Southold, New York 11971 KENNETH L. EDWARDS �+' T Fax (516) 765-3136 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y�f `� Telephone (516) 765-1938 RICHARD G.WARD cc PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 1, 1999 Joseph Frederick Gazza P.O. Box 969 5 Ogden Lane Quogue, NY 11959 RE: Subdivision Applications for Gazza and Lettieri SCTM# 1000-22-3- (19-22) & 31-5-1 .2 Dear Mr. Gazza: I reviewed the above mentioned files in response to your telephone request for a list of the application fees and environmental fees paid to the Planning Board during the subdivision review. The fees paid are as follows: August 1985 Minor subdivision application fees $1600.00 July 1989 SEQRA review fee $70.00 May 1993 SEQRA review fee $1500.00 October 1993 SEQRA scoping fee $350.00 Please let me know if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Melissap r`o/; - Planner X13 o Albert J. Krupaki, PresidenTown Hall t G 53095 Main Road James King,Vice-President c y� P.O.Box 1179 Henry Smith Ca = Southold,New York 11971 Artie Foster p W Ken Poliwoda �'� �t� Telephone(516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Planning Board Members FROM: BOARD OF TRUSTEES DATE: June 18, 1999 RE: Gazza/Lettieri project On Monday June 28, 1999 at approx. 7 :oo p.m. the Board of Trustees would like to have a meeting with your board and the Zoning Board to discuss the Gazza/Lettieri project. Please let Diane or Lauren know if you can make this meeting. If you have any questions, please contact our office at 765-1892 . tiUc�:b Y .: •:-Yf�i �e APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS • SpFFO(,) M< Southold Town Hall Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman =� y� 53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. y P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A. Tortora Southold,New York 11971 Lora S. Collins y o�� ZBA Fax(516)765-9064 George Homing Telephone(516)765-1809 P� f BOARD OF APPEALS F LJ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 9, 1999 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Appl. No. 4619 - Request for Improvements/Fire Access' `s 3 �✓ Dear Mrs. Moore: As a follow-up and reminder, this will confirm that the above application is incomplete pending receipt of documentation, noted below (ref. ZBA October 8, 1998 letter). Would you please forward a copy of the SEQRA law or Section under Part 617 referred to in your January 28, 1999 letter. 1) Seven (7) prints of a survey map with preparer's name, showing the 15' wide driveway required by the Zoning Code and the number of buildings proposed and the points of access from the proposed right-of-way construction. (The most recent map submitted to the ZBA was dated October 18, 1998 referring to"T'lots.) 2) Staking or similar markings, in part, to show proposed path and turns, along both sides of proposed ROW construction, and photographs of same in relation to the wetlands. 3) Copy of Town Trustees' action and State D.E.C. application or permit regarding the proposed construction activities within 300 feet of wetlands. Thank you. Very truly yours, GERARD P. GOEHRIN IM3\V D CHAIRMAN APR 0 - rz;;,a Southold Town Planning Board �8 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O.Box 483 Mattituck,New Yak 11952 Tel:(516)298-5629 Fax:(516)298-5664 Margaret Rutkowski Se=taiy April 30, 1996 Board of Town Trustees Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Lettieri 280A access for lots SCTM# 1000-22-3-19 to 22 Dear President Krupski and Members of the Board: I would respectfully request a presubmission conference with the Board regarding the proposed 280A access to the above referenced lots. As you know this property has been the subject of litigation with the adjacent major subdivision, Cove Beach Estates. Alternative access over the adjacent parcel has been sought unsuccessfully through court action. The owners of the above referenced parcels have agreed not to subdivide the five acre lots, however they will require 280A access from the Zoning Board of Appeals and a wetland permit from you. Before we locate the proposed access, we request your guidance and assistance. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr cc: Mr. & Mrs. Andrew Lettieri ;-% Joseph Gazza, Esq. / =j Southold Town Planning Board V 6 ��; MAY 11996 r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ' Richard G.Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �? 9 P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald r ; :r Fax(516) 765-3136 +J' Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 17, 1994 Daniel L. Morris The Open Space Council P.O. Box 275 Brookhaven, NY 11719 Re: Proposed subdivision of Gazza—Lettieri parcels in East Marion Dear Mr. Morris: I regret to inform you that the Planning Board is unable to notify the Open Space Council in writing of all SEORA related actions. However, you are free to call this office on a regular basis to inquire as to the status of the environmental review of the Gazza—Lettieri subdivisions on Dam Pond. For your information, a scoping session was held on October 28, 1993. The final scoping outline for the draft DEIS is enclosed for your convenience. Since the developer has not submitted a draft environmental impact statement as of today, the Planning Board has not proceeded with the environmental review. Sincerely, Valerie Scopoz Town Planner for Richard G. Ward, Chairman enc. r � JS TRUSTEES p ' g�FFO( SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President ;�U� gyp,' + SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smithy ; 1 " Town Hall John B. Tuthill v- r 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson �� �� �,�� P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 . �`� Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Valerie Scopaz FROM: John M. Bredemeyer, RE: Scoping Session : Ga a/Letteri SCTM #22-3-19, 20, 21, 22 & 31-5-1.2 DATE: November 19, 1993 The Southold Town Trustees are in receipt of your November 12, 1993 memo and the attached scoping outline in the above referenced matter. The outline properly addresses our environmental concerns for inclusion in the impact statement. Since the Trustees are not inclined to approve any exclusive private easement over Trustee lands for this or any site, we will actively participate in the SEQRA review of the access road as it relates to our proprietary, public trust, and environmental authority. We thank you for sharing the scoping outline with us as we now await the -EIS. __ NOV 2 9 JOJ p ,SVG SCAM) I I i The j1 OPEN SPACE Council SrrB�it� P.O.Box 275,Brookhaven, NY 11719 Pb MS Mr. Richard Ward VS Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. P. 0. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 RE:proposed subdivisions of Gazze-Lettieri parcels in East Marion Dear Mr. Ward, The Open Space Council is very interested in the project recently listed in the Environmental Notice Bulletin. of October 13, 1993 Our major concerns include consideration of the following items: 1. Cluster development plan of the parcels 2. Public acquisition alaernWres,Town,County and Stmte 3. Loss of open space,impacts to wildlife and vegetation particularly NYS endangered,threatened species and species of special concern 4. Impacts to Town Trustee owned Dam Pond and its tributaries associated natural resources and coastal processes 5. Growth inducing aspects including traffic burden to NY S route 25 6. Impacts to groundwater quality and quantity Please include the Open Space Council as a"party of interest"in the continuing SEQRA process and inform us of meetings,hearings or publication of the required documents. ectfully, OJ�1� Daniel L. Mo •L North Fork Projects Coordinator PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSA SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard G.Ward,Chairman �.;'r y.• Supervisor George Ritchie Latham,Jr. , Bennett Orlowski,Jr. ^_v' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road t Mark S. McDonald ' -:- - P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 12, 1993 Joseph F. Gazza, Applicant and Agent P.O. Box 969 Quogue, NY 11959 Re: Scoping Session for Gazza/Lettieri SCTM# 1000-22-3-19, 20, 21, 22 and 31-5-1.2 Dear Mr. Gazza: Enclosed you will find a summary outline of the scoping session that was held on October 28, 1993 . Please use it as a guide when compiling the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Copies of this outline are being sent to all the coordinating agencies that have been participating in the review of these applications. If any of these agencies want additional information to be added to the summary outline, you will be so notified. If there are any questions or objections about the outline, please call me. Sincerely, Valerie Sco a Senior Planner enc. 1�M`} R lit V✓Yj PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS n SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Richard G.Ward.Chafrtr43n ''•, ^�,;,,✓ ^'�, George Ritchie Latham,Jr. 7, 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. - P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald "''" Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 12, 1993 To Coordinating Agencies: Re: Scoping Session for Gazza/Letticri SCTM# 1000-22-3-19 , 20, 21 , 22 and 31-5-1. 2 A joint scoping session was held in Southold Town Hall on October 28, 1993 for all five of the above-noted subdivisions. Enclosed you will find the summary outline of that session. This outline will be used by the applicant to compile a single draft Environmental Impact Statement for the five subdivisions. The Planning Board will use this outline to determine the completeness of the draft. As a coordinating agency, the Planning Board would appreciate your reviewing the enclosed document to ensure that the concerns of your agency are included. If they are not, please commit them to writing within the next few weeks, so that this summary outline can be amended as needed. If we do not hear from you, we will assume your agreement with the contents of this summary outline. Thank you for your time. Si>�cerely, Z Valerie Senior Planner CC: Commissioner - Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office - NYSDEC, Suny @ Stony Brook Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission New York State Department of Transportation New York State Department of State enc. M 0 .S�circ CRAMER, V \\ Alf1sOCIATESENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS YDS f 15 October 28, 1993 Ms. Valerie Scopaz Planner Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Dam Pond, Marion 5 Pending Subdivisions Scope of Draft EIS Dear Valerie: As per our meeting of October 28, attached,please find the final scope of the Draft EIS for this project. This outline incorporates changes discussed during the scoping meeting. This outline can be circulated to the applicant, involved agencies and parties of interest for the purpose of establishing an understanding of the issues which the Town will be seeking to have incorporated into the document. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you, and please call if you have any questions. Very truly ours,us Voorhis,rEP,AICD enc: scoping outline 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 f _ • DAM POND,MARION-SUBDIVISIONS SEQR SCOPING OUTLINE TABLE OF CONTENTS AND SUMMARY A table of contents and a brief summary are required for Draft EIS The summary will include: A. Brief description of the action B. Significant beneficial and adverse impacts,(issues of controversy must be specified) C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternatives considered E. Matters to be decided(permits,approvals,funding) 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION A. PROJECT PURPOSE,NEED AND BENEFITS 1. Background and history—History of acquisition and past use 2. Public need for the project,and municipality objectives based on adopted community developments plans--summarize municipal objectives from land use plan section 3. Objectives of the project sponsor 4. Benefits of the proposed action a) social b) economic B. LOCATION 1. Establish geographic boundaries of the project(use of regional and local scale maps is recommended) 2. Description of access to site 3. Description of existing zoning of proposed site C. DESIGN AND LAYOUT 1. Total site area—describe unique features of the site which constrain use a) tidal wetlands b) freshwater wetlands c) surface water d) shallow groundwater e) unique habitat 2. Site Coverage Quantities—prepare a table of estimated site coverage quantities a) estimated building coverage b) estimated driveway coverage C) estimated subdivision road coverage d) estimated landscaped area(fertilized/unfertilized) e) estimated natural area 3. Structures--expected structures based on market and zoning code 4. Water Supply—ability to meet Article 4 and water quality standards 5. Sanitary Disposal--necessary fill and ability to conform to SCDHS design CRAMER, VC R x / SOCIATES Pagel ENVIRONMENTA _ ,VG CONSULTANTS � Dam Pond,Marion-Subdivisions SEQRA Scoping Checklist requirements 6. Stormwater Disposal—capacity and design requirements D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION 1. Construction a) total construction period anticipated--timing of development b) schedule of construction activities—particularly due to wildlife sensitive periods c) future potential development,on site or on adjoining properties 2. Operation a) type of operation--road/recharge dedication;open space dedication if applicable; are any future piers or waterfront structures contemplated b) schedule of operation—if applicable E. APPROVALS 1. Permit approvals—list agency,permit and status a) Town of Southold Planning Board--subdivision b) Town of Southold Trustees--use of land;wetlands c) SC Dept.of Health Services--sanitary disposal and water supply d) NYS Dept.of Environmental Conservation--tidal and freshwater wetlands; protection of waters;water supply if greater than 45 gpm e) Army Corps of Engineers—if activity below spring high water;CZM consistency review,if applicable IL ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1. Subsurface a) composition and thickness of subsurface material--summarize test hole information 2. Surface a) List of soil types b) discussion of soil characteristics c) distribution of soil types at project site d) suitability for use 3. Topography--utilize topo map based on 2'contour intervals a) description of topography at project site - slopes - prominent or unique features B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a) depth to groundwater b) seasonal fluctuations/tidal fluctuations c) water table contours and direction of flow d) discuss groundwater-surface water inter-relationship;discharge to surface water; tidal fluctuations C) determine eadsting water quality beneath the site in anticipated water supply zones CRAMER, V H SOCIATES �2 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Dam Pond,Marton-Subdivisions SEQRA Scoping Checklist f) identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater - location of existing wells - public/private water supply - agricultural uses 2. Surface Water a) describe Dam Pond estuary b) NYSDEC surface water classification c) determine tidal influences d) present water quality and salinity C. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY L Vegetation a) list vegetation types on the project site and within the surrounding area;classify into habitats b) discussion of site vegetation characteristics - species presence and abundance - age - size - distribution - dominance - community types - unique,rare and endangered species - value as habitat for wildlife . productivity C) contact NYS Natural Heritage Program for information concerning unique vegetation,habitats or wildlife species d) describe habitat needs and biological characteristics of all endangered, threatened and species of special concern 2. Wildlife a) perform on-site field inspections to determine wildlife occupying the site b) consult references to determine species expected to occupy site based on habitat type c) list species associated with site;differentiate between species observed on site and species present on site;identify endangered,threatened and species of special concern d) contact NYS Natural Heritage Program for information concerning unique vegetation,habitats or wildlife species e) describe habitat needs and biological characteristics of all endangered, threatened and species of special concern 3. Wetlands a) describe wetlands and characteristics b) outline NYSDEC wetlands classifications and discuss importance/benefits of each type on or adjacent to the site Human Resources A. TRANSPORTATION 1. Transportation Services a) describe access to the site,main road and internal road circulation CRAMER, VSOCIATES Page ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Dam Pond,Marion-Subdivisions SEQRA Scoping Checklist b) describe existing level of use on Main Road—ferry traffic,seasonal traffic - am.and p.m.peak hour traffic flow - vehicle mu - source of existing traffic c) make not of pedestrian environment and public transportation,if applicable - a.m.and p.m.peak hour traffic flow - vehicle mix - source of existing traffic B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Existing land use and zoning a) description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area - make note of Cove Beach Estates and graphically identify open space areas b) description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area 2. Land use plans a) description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area - Master Plan - Draft LWRP - Southold Land Use Task Force draft recommedations - SC Planning Commission recommended acquisition parcels report - Governors Task Force draft recommendations C. COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Educational facilities 2. Police protection 3. Fire protection 4. Recreational facilities 5. Utilities D. CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources a) description of the physical character of the area b) description of natural areas of significant architectural design 2. Historic/Archaeological Resources—include Cultural Resources Assessment if completed 9I a) describe existing historic areas or structures listed on State or National Register or designated by the community,or included on Statewide Inventory b) determine if previous historic structures existed on project site through review of historic maps available at libraries C) contact NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation, Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau for information pertaining to history and prehistory of the site ID. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Review each aspect of the environmental setting in Section IV and provide a qualitative CRAMER, V �\\\ A/ SOCIATES Page4 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Dam Pond,Marion,Subdivisions SEQRA Scoping Checklist discussion of impacts with quantification of impacts where possible. impacts that are not significant need only be discussed to the point where this is(1emonstrated. Significant impacts should be discussed in detail appropriate for the scope of the impact. The following key issues are noted: ' Sediment control and erosion protection methods should be described to minimize siltation of wetlands and habitat areas and minim* erosion of proposed fill areas. ' Excavation for basements and sanitary systems should be discussed as related to soil quantities and erosion protection. ' Soils/Topographic Elevation/Depth to groundwater as related to functioning of sanitary systems. ' Quantity and location of full necessary to create properly functioning sanitary systems. • Nitrogen concentration in recharge and environmental/ewlogical impact on Dam Pond via groundwater underflow. A nitrogen budget should be performed,and discussion of direction of flow and setbacks should be discussed as related to these impacts. ' Discuss project in view of Article 6 and SCDHS design criteria. Discuss Board of Review process,if applicable for sanitary systems. ' Water quality beneath site and suitability for water supply wells. ' Impact of groundwater withdrawal from supply wells on existing hydrology. • Impact of the project on surface water by overland runoff from roads and fertilized areas. Impact on significant habitats and specific species associated with these habitats. ' Fragmentation of significant habitat particularly in view of Dam Pond and associated wetlands. Consideration should be given to the peninsula area,and alignment of habitat/open space areas with the adjacent Cove Beach Estates open space areas. ` Impact on ability of NYSDEC designated wetlands to continue to provide benefits identified in Section II. • Conformance of project to land use plans and planning efforts/open space preservation strategies of the Town of Southold. ' Vehicle trip generation and ability of roads to accommodate traffic. ' Impact of the project on cultural resources including visual,and historic/archaeological resources which may be identified as a result of Section 11. IV. MITIGATION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Describe-measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Section III. The following is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major areas of impact. Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1. Subsurface a) use excavated material on site b) reuse topsoil for landscaped areas 2. Surface a) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration and landscaping b) m;n;m;>P disturbance of non-construction sites-proposed buffer areas and conservation easements C) design and implement soil erosion control plan 3. Topography a) avoid construction on areas or steep slope b) design adequate soil erosion devices to protect areas of steep slope CRAMER, V SOCIATES Page ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Dam Pond,Marlon-Subdivisions SEQRA Scoping Cbeddist B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a) ensure adequate sanitary design b) maintain permeable areas on the site 2. Surface water a) ensure use of soil erosion control techniques during construction and operation to avoid siltation examples: - hay bales - temporary restoration of vegetation to disturbed areas - landscaping b) design adequate stormwater control system C. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation a) restrict clearing to only those areas necessary b) preserve part of site as a natural area c) after construction,landscape site with naturally occurring vegetation d) time construction activities to avoid wildlife impacts Human Resources A. TRANSPORTATION 1. Transportation--design adequate and safe access to project site to handle projected traffic flow B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Existing land use and zoning a) design project to comply with existing land use plans b) design functional and visually appealing facility to set standard and precedent for future surrounding land use C. COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Police/Fire protection--ensure efficient access to residences on the site 2. Utilities a) install utility services underground b) incorporate water saving fixtures into facility design D. CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources a) provide buffering to improve aesthetics b) minimize road surface area and significant land disturbance 2. Historic/Archaeological--to be determined based on Section II. V. ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED Identify those adverse environmental effects is Section IV that can be expected to occur regardless of the mitigation measures considered in Section IV. CRAMER, VR ` SOCIATES Page 6 ENVIRONMENT ;�_ ;� G CONSULTANTS Dam Pond,Marion-Subdivisions SEQRA Scoping Checklist VI. ALTERNATIVES This section contains categories of alternatives with examples. Discussion of each alternative should be at a level sufficient to permit a comparative assessment of costs,benefits and environmental risks for each alternative. It is not acceptable to make simple assertions that a particular alternative is or is not feasible. Conceptual sketch plans should accompany alternative design plans to provide a basis for comparison and analysis. A. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN 1. Site layout a) location of structures b) location of access routes—avoid crossing of Trustees land 2 Clustering a) propose a cluster plan which avoids sensitive areas of the site as identified in Section II(i.e.shallow groundwater,wetlands areas and interconnection corridors) 3. Transfer of Development Rights a) determine other potentially suitable lands to receive development rights from all or a portion of the subdivisions with the intent of minimiring impact upon sensitive areas 4. Acquisition a) discuss feasibility of acquisition of all or the most sensitive portions of the overall project site in order to minimize impact upon sensitive areas B. NO ACTION 1. Impacts of no action a) effect on public need b) effect on private developers,need c) beneficial or adverse environmental impacts VII. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section III that will be consumed, converted or made unavailable for future use. VIII. GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS Indicate if project will cause additional growth in the area which would not otherwise occur. Consider access,utilities and precedent. DL APPENDICES Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the EIS. A. List of underlying studies,reports and information considered and relied on in preparing statement B. Technical exhibits(if any)at a legible scale C. Relevant correspondence regarding the projects may be included C AMER,ENVIRONMENT NT 4 C ATESONSU Pagel ENVIRONMENT ` `�IG CONSULTANTS .Su lei P� >�S M5 NORTH FORK ENVIROMMENTA1. COUNCIL Route 25 at Love Lane, PO Box 799, Mattituck, NY 11952 516-298-8880 October 28 , 1993 Mr . Richard Ward , Chair Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , New York 11971 RE : Scoping - Gazza Subdivision application Dear Mr . Ward , I am writing to you , on behalf of the North Fork Environmental Council , to discuss the issues that should be addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Gazza application which includes creating 12 lots on Dam Pond . The NFEC is particularly concerned about this subdivision because of its location immediately adjacent to Dam Pond which is an extremely sensitive tidal wetland. The sensitivity of this area has been recognized in that it was designated a Significant Coastal Fish & Wildlife Habitat by the Department of State, and a Critical Environmental Area, by the Suffolk County Legislature . It is important for the DEIS to focus extensively on the impacts that the subdivision will cause to the proposed site ' s natural resource values . I have attached an outline of additional issues that should be discussed in the document . Thank you for including them on your scoping check list for this project . Sincerely , f Attachment 23 : 23 i ' Llr AD rG';.14 '6 a non-profit organization for the preservation of land, sea, air and quality of life printed on 100% recycled paper /1 0 0 Scoping list - Gazza Subdivision Page ? ACCESS The fact that the site lacks access must be fully discussed in the DEIS . The DEIS should identify an access clan , beth for the subdivision and for each individual lot , and the impacts associated with the access clan should be discussed . Will the access route affect wetlands , have a visual impact , or disturb wildlife utilizing Dam Pond? Will the access clan interfere with fishing or shellfishing opportunities in the Pond? Mitigation measures , buffers , and setbacks to prevent impacts from occurring shou . d be described . CONSTRUCTION The effects of construction (si '. tation/erosion ) on the wetlands on-site , and in Dam Pond should be fully discussed . The DEIS should discuss future or potential development on the adjoining parcel . Cumulative impacts , on the Dam Pond ecosystem, with that development should be discussed . Describe all measures to mitigate impacts , including erosion control , setbacks and the delineation of building envelopes . APPPOVALS The applicant should demonstrate how the project w- 11 comply with all existing local , county and state laws , including but not united to, Suffolk County Health Codes . All additional permitting agencies including but not limited to Army Corps , DEC, Trustees , and Department of State , should be identified , and compliance with their regulations discussed . LAND USE PLANS The DEIS should discuss this project ' s conformance with the Master Plan . It should also discuss any US/UK recommendations for changes to the Master Plan that affect this site, or the resources found or, the site, including but not limited to wildlife habitat , visual character , open space protection, and the fact that development of the site may adversely impact the Peconic Estuary . Reccmmendations in Southold ' s Local Waterfront devitalization Plan should also be discussed . Demonstrate compliance . I 0 Scoping list - Gazza Subdivision Page 2 TRANSPORTATION Discuss condition of roads and current level of use, discuss proposed increase in use on ,Route 25 , include cumulative increases from this project , and the adjacent proposed subdivision . GROUND AND SURFACE WATER RESOURCES The aquifers and on-site recharge , depth to water , quality and flow of groundwater on the site should be discussed . Water usage should be estimated . Source of drinking water (public/private wells ) should identified. Describe on-s -:te drainage patterns and discuss run-off containment . Dam Pond , Orient Harbor and their relationship to the Peconic Estuary should be thoroughly discussed . The National Estuary Program anc the oujectives of the Program for the Peconic Estuary should be described . The Brown Tide Study and its reccmmendaiicns should also be discussed and compliance demonstrated . TERRESTRIAL AND WILDLIFE List and describe all types of vegetation on-site, include discussion of community types and their value as habitat . List all species of wildlife that may utilize the site , include indigenous and migratory species . Include the results of an on- site field inventory . Identify any rare, endangered or threatened species that may use this site. Discuss their habitat needs . Discuss long and short-term impacts to the wildlife . WETLANDS Describe wetlands on-site and their association to Orient ' Harbor and the Peconic Estuary . Describe wetland values . Discuss the objectives of the Tidal Wetlands regulations and describe compliance . Discuss the known impacts of fertilization and run-off on wetlands . Describe measures that will be taken to prevent those impacts from occurring here . Scoping list - Gazza Subdivision Page 3 FISH AND SHELLFISH Discuss fishing and shellfishing opportunities available in Dam Pond and Orient Harbor . Discuss the impact of nitrogen loading on shellfish beds . Discuss economic implications of shellfish bed closures in Southold . OPEN SPACE Discuss the objectives of the open space programs and policies of the Town , the county and the state in regard to coastal areas . Describe how this project wil . meet those objectives . FLOOD PLAIN AND COASTAL EROSION identify and map any areas within the Flood Plain on the project site . Discuss FEMA regulations . NYS Coastal Erosion Management regulations should be discussed and compliance demonstrated . ALTERNATIVES Reduce size of lots to one acre and cluster away from wetlands . 2 . Public acquisition . Identify possible sources of funding including County Open Space Program, Town Open Space Program and state Environmental Assistance Funds . 3. No action . to to:,�5 u.n Ma,�.t� J� Tom. �SauA-koi�L mo i. r-. gnz-ZA PnLr r I i it ' i � I i DAM POND,MARION-SUBDIVISIONS SEQR SCOPING OUTLINE TABLE OF CONTENTS AND SUMMARY A table of contents and a brief summary are required for Draft EIS The summary will include: A. Brief description of the action B. Significant,beneficial and adverse impacts,(issues of controversy must be specified) C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternatives considered E. Matters to be decided(permits,approvals,funding) 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION A. PROJECT PURPOSE,NEED AND BENEFITS 1. Background and history--History of acquisition and past use - 2. Public need for the project,and municipality objectives based on adopted community developments plans--summarize municipal objectives from land use plan section 3. Objectives of the project sponsor 4. Benefits of the proposed action a) social b) economic B. LOCATION 1. Establish geographic boundaries of the project(use of regional and local scale maps is recommended) 2. Description of access to site 3. Description of existing zoning of proposed site C. DESIGN AND LAYOUT 1. Total site area—describe unique features of the site which constrain use a) tidal wetlands b) freshwater wetlands c) surface water d) shallow groundwater e) unique habitat 2. Site Coverage Quantities--prepare a table of estimated site coverage quantities a) estimated building coverage b) estimated driveway coverage c) estimated subdivision road coverage d) estimated landscaped area(fertilized/unfertilized) e) estimated natural area 3. Structures--expected structures based on market and zoning code CRAMER, VOCIATES Page 1 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Dam Pond,Marion-Subdivisions SEQRA Scoping Checklist 4. Water Supply--ability to meet Article 4 and water quality standards 5. Sanitary Disposal—necessary fill and ability to conform to SCDHS design requirements 6. Stormwater Disposal--capacity and design requirements D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION 1. Construction a) total construction period anticipated--timing of development b) schedule of construction activities—particularly due to wildlife sensitive periods c) future potential development,on site or on adjoining properties 2 Operation a) type of operation—road/recharge dedication;open space dedication if applicable; are any future piers or waterfront structures contemplated b) schedule of operation--if applicable E. APPROVALS 1. Permit approvals—list agency,permit and status a) Town of Southold Planning Board--subdivision b) Town of Southold Trustees--use of land;wetlands c) SC Dept.of Health Services—sanitary disposal and water supply d) NYS Dept.of Environmental Conservation—tidal and freshwater wetlands; protection of waters;water supply if greater than 45 gpm C) Army Corps of Engineers—if activity below spring high water;CZM consistency review,if applicable II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1. Subsurface a) composition and thicimess of subsurface material--summarize test hole information 2 Surface a) List of soil types b) discussion of soil characteristics c) distribution of soil types at project site d) suitability for use 3. Topography a) description of topography at project site - slopes - prominent or unique features B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a) depth to groundwater b) seasonal fluctuations/tidal fluctuations c) water table contours and direction of flow d) discuss groundwater-surface water inter-relationship;discharge to surface water; tidal fluctuations CRAMER, Vev SOCIATES Paget ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Dam Pond,Marlon-Subdivisions SEQRA Scoping Checklist e) determine existing water quality beneath the site in anticipated water supply zones f) identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater - location of existing wells - public/private water supply - agricultural uses 2. Surface Water a) describe Dam Pond estuary b) NYSDEC water supply classification c) determine tidal influences d) present water quality and salinity C. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation a) list vegetation types on the project site and within the surrounding area;classify into habitats / b) discussion of site vegetation characteristics v - species presence and abundance - age - size - distribution - dominance - community types - unique,rare and endangered species - value as habitat for wildlife - productivity c) contact NYS Natural Heritage Program for information cwncerniag unique vegetation,habitats or wildlife species d) describe habitatneeds and biological characteristics of all endangered, threatened and species of special concern 2. Wildlife a) perform on-site field inspections to determine wildlife occupying the site / b) consult references to determine species expected to occupy site based on habitat type c) list species associated with site;differentiate between species observed on site and species present on site;identify endangered,threatened and species of special concern d) contact NYS Natural Heritage Program for information concerning unique vegetation,habitats or wildlife species e) describe habitat needs and biological characteristics of all endangered, threatened and species of special concern 3. Wetlands a) describe wetlands and characteristics b) outline NYSDEC wetlands classifications and discuss importance/benefits of each type on or adjacent to the site Human Resources A. TRANSPORTATION CRAMER, V SOCIATES Page ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Dam Pond,Marion•Subdivisions SEQRA Scoping Checklist 1. Transportation Services a) describe access to the site,main road and internal road circulation b) describe existing level of use on Main Road—ferry traffic,seasonal traffic - am.and pm.peak hour traffic flow - vehicle mix - source of existing traffic C) make not of pedestrian environment and public transportation,if applicable - a.m.and p.m.peak hour traffic flow - vehicle mix - source of existing traffic B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Existing land use and zoning a) description of the existiag land use of the project site and the surrounding area - make note of Cove Beach Estates and graphically identify open space areas b) description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area 2. Land use plans a) description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area Master Plan Draft LWRP C. COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Educational facilities 2. Police protection 3. Fire protection 4. Recreational facilities 5. Utilities D. DEMOGRAPHY E. CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources a) description of the physical character of the area b) description of natural areas of significant architectural design 2. Historic/Archaeological Resources a) describe existing historic areas or structures listed on State or National Register or designated by the community,or included on Statewide Inventory b) determine if previous historic structures existed on project site through review of historic maps available at libraries C) contact NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation, Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau for information pertaining to history and prehistory of the site III. SIGNIRCANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Review each aspect of the environmental setting in Section IV and provide a qualitative discussion of impacts with quantification of impacts where possible. Impacts that are not significant CRAMER, VR `l Sig OCIATES Page ENT ENVIRONMG CONSULTANTS Dam Pond,Marion-Subdivisions SEQRA Scoping Checklist need only be discussed to the point where this is demonstrated Significant impacts should be discussed in detail appropriate for the scope of the impact. The following hey issues are noted: ' Sediment control and erosion protection methods should be described to minimize siltation of wetlands and habitat areas and minimize erosion of proposed fill areas. ' Excavation for basements and sanitary systems should be discussed as related to soil quantities and erosion protection. ' Soils/Topographic Elevation/Depth to groundwater as related to functioning of sanitary systems. ' Quantity and location of fill necessary to create properly functioning sanitary systems. • Nitrogen concentration in recharge and environmental/ecological impact on Dam Pond via groundwater underf►ow. A nitrogen budget should be performed,and discussion of direction of flow and setbacks should be discussed as related to these impacts. • Discuss project in view of Article 6 and SCDHS design criteria. Discuss Board of Review process,if applicable for sanitary systems. • Water quality beneath site and suitability for water supply wells. • Impact of groundwater withdrawal from supply wells on existing hydrology. ' Impact of the project on surface water by overland runoff from roads and fertilized areas. ' Impact on significant habitats and specific species associated with these habitats. • Fragmentation of significant habitat particularly in view of Dam Pond and associated wetlands. Consideration should be given to the peninsula area,and alignment of habitat/open space areas with the adjacent Cove Beach Estates open space areas. ' Impact on ability of NYSDEC designated wetlands to continue to provide benefits identified in Section II. • Conformance of project to land use plans and planning efforts/open space preservation strategies of the Town of Southold • Vehicle trip generation and ability of roads to accommodate traffic. ' Impact of the project on cultural resources including visual,and historic/archaeological resources which may be identified as a result of Section II. IV. MITIGATION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Section III. The following is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major areas of impact. Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1. Subsurface a) use excavated material on site b) reuse topsoil for landscaped areas 2. Surface a) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration and landscaping b) minim; disturbance of non-construction sites—proposed buffer areas c) design and implement soil erosion control plan 3. Topography a) avoid construction on areas or steep slope b) design adequate soil erosion devices to protect areas of steep slope B. WATER RESOURCES CRAMER, VQA OCIATES Pates ENVIRONMENTG CONSULTANTS Dam Pond,Marion-Subdivisions SEQRA Seeping Checklist 1. Groundwater a) ensure adequate sanitary design b) maintain permeable areas on the site 2. Surface water a) ensure use of soil erosion control techniques during construction and operation to avoid siltation examples: - hay bales - temporary restoration of vegetation to disturbed areas - landscaping �(Q b) design adequate stormwater control system TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation a) restrict clearing to only those areas necessary b) preserve part of site as a natural area c) after construction,landscape site with naturally occurring vegetation d) time construction activities to avoid wildlife impacts Human Resources A. TRANSPORTATION L Transportation--design adequate and safe access to project site to handle projected traffic flow B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Existing land use and zoning a) design project to comply with existing land use plans b) design functional and visually appealing facility to set standard and precedent for future surrounding land use C. COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Police/Fire protection—ensure efficient access to residences on the site 2. Utilities a) install utility services underground b) incorporate water saving fixtures into facility design D. CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources a) provide buffering to improve aesthetics b) minimiroad surface area and significant land disturbance 2. Historic/Archaeological--to be determined based on Section 11. V. ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED Identify those adverse environmental effects is Section IV that can be expected to occur regardless of the mitigation measures considered in Section IV. VI. ALTERNATIVES This section contains categories of alternatives with examples. Discussion of each alternative CRAMER, VR \ / SOCIATES Page 6 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Dam Pond,Marion•Subdivisions SEQRA Scoping Checklist should be at a level sufficient to permit a comparative assessment of costs,benefits and environmental risks for each alternative. It is not acceptable to make simple assertions that a particular alternative is or is not feasible. Conceptual sketch plans should accompany alternative design plans to provide a basis for comparison and analysis. A. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN 1. Site layout a) location of structures b) location of access routes 2. Clustering a) propose a cluster plan which avoids sensitive areas of the site as identified in Section II(Le.shallow groundwater,wetlands areas and interconnection corridors 3. Transfer of Development Rights a) determine other potentially suitable Kurds to receive development rights from all or a portion of the subdivisions with the intent of minimizing impact upon sensitive areas 4. Acquisition a) discuss feasibility of acquisition of all or the most sensitive portions of the overall project site in order to minimize impact upon sensitive areas B. NO ACTION 1. Impacts of no action a) effect on public need b) effect on private developers'need c) beneficial or adverse environmental impacts VII. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section III that will be consumed, converted or made unavailable for future use. VIII. GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS Indicate if project will cause additional growth in the area which would not otherwise occur. Consider access,utilities and precedent. DL APPENDICES Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the EIS. A. List of underlying studies,reports and information considered and relied on in preparing statement B. Technical exhibits(if any)at a legible scale C. Relevant correspondence regarding the projects may be included CRAMER, V SOCIATES Page7 ENVIRONMENT �_ G CONSULTANTS �o��g�►Ff0(,��OGy 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti SCOTT L. HARRIS WO • Supervisor Richard G.Ward,Chairman George Ritchie Latham,Jr. ��,( ��0 Town Hall.53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold,New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOU MOLD October 6, 1993 The Southold Town Planning Board will hold a scoping session on the Gazza/Lettieri subdivision, on Thursday, October 28, 1993 at 9:30 a.m. in the Supervisor' s conference room at Southold Town Hall, Main Rd. , Southold. Richard G. Ward Chairman • SyBFjt.L o A. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn T SCOTT L. HARRIS } Supervisor Rirhard G. Ward,Chairman 0! 4 George Ritchie Latham.Jr. Town 6rdl, 53095 MRo Bennett Orlowski,Jr. a P. O. Box III Mark S. McDonald Southold,New York 400,A. Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE pax(sts) 7ssBi W Telephone(516)765-1938 '�'� October 1 , 1993 TOWN OFSOUTHOLD mri"in V1 C r In cm ErT d ( � a34 UjIL� 2 Joseph F. Gazza P.O. sox 969 OCT 51 c heck in drawer cm a� 0 r LA- 3 Ogden Lane Q Quogue, NY 11959 IWjJ Re: Scoping Session for Gazza/Lettieri 1 SCTM# 1000-22-3-19 , 20, 21, 22 and 31-5-1. 2 Dear Mr. Gazza: 2 Pursuant to our conversation, a scoping session has been ser for Thursday, October 28, 1993 at 9: 30 a.m. for the above mentioned subdivision. Please notify your environmental consultant of this date. The scoping session will be held in the Supervisor' s conference room at Southold Town Hall. A Copy of the Positive Declaration was sent to you under separate cover. The fee for the session will be $350.00, and must be paid one week prior to this meeting. If this is not convenient, please notify us immediately and the o session will be re-scheduled. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Board office at 765-1938. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Q Chairman cc: Commissioner - Department of Environmental Conservation' + [ Regional Office - NYSDEC, Suny @ Stony Brook >, Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission h� New York State Department of Transportation ` (O New York State Department of State M O � J PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ni SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard G. Ward,Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham.Jr. b Town Hao 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. _ P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1936 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516) 765- 1823 October 1 , 1993 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Joseph F. Gazza P.O. Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, NY 11959 Re: Scoping Session for Gazza/Lettieri SCTM# 1000-22-3-19, 20, 21, 22 and 31-5-1.2 Dear Mr. Gazza: Pursuant to our conversation, a scoping session has been set for Thursday, October 28, 1993 at 9: 30 a.m. for the above mentioned subdivision. Please notify your environmental consultant of this date. The scoping session will be held in the Supervisor' s conference room at Southold Town Hall. A copy of the Positive Declaration was sent to you under separate cover. The fee for the session will be $350.00, and must be paid one week prior to this meeting. If this is not convenient, please notify us immediately and the session will be re-scheduled. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Board office at 765-1938. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Commissioner - Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office - NYSDEC, Suny @ Stony Brook Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission New York State Department of Transportation New York State Department of State • i PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard O. Ward. Chairman " _\' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham.Jr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. - _ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald �i.�,`=r"- P.0. Box 1179 Kenneth L Edwards Southold,New York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765 . 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: All Involved Agencies From: Southold Town Planning Board Re: Scoping session for Gazza/Lettieri SCTM# 1000-22-3-19, 20, 21, 22 and 31-5-1.2 Date: October 1, 1993 A scoping session has been set for Thursday, October 28, 1993 at -9: 30 a.m. for the above mentioned subdivision. The scoping session will be held in the Supervisor's conference room at Southold Town Hall. A copy of the Positive Declaration is enclosed. If you are unable to attend the scoping session, please send any comments you may have as to items you wish addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, to the Planning Board office. The Board's fax number is 765-1823. cc: Commissioner - Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office - NYSDEC, Suny @ Stony Brook Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission New York State Department of Transportation New York State Department of State PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS C13 SCOTT L. HARRIS d'1 H Supervisor Richard G. Waal.Chairman -` •:' , t�' George Ritchie Latham.Jr. `�,( :4 rY ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road m Bennett Orlowski,Jr. P. O. Boz 1179 Mark S. McDonald '� `��w Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516) 765- 1823 TOWN OF SOU HOLD September 14, 1993 Joseph F. Gazza P.O. Box 969 3 Odgen Lane Quogue, NY 11959 Re: Proposed minor subdivisions Joseph F. Gazza SCTM# 1000-22-3-19 & 22-3-21 Dear Mr. Gazza: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, September 13 , 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, makes a determination of significance, and grants a Positive Declaration. Enclosed please find copies of the Positive Declaration for your records. Sincerely, RichardG. Chairman enc. U�rdl � - PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 4 Y rc " rn SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard G. Ward.Chairman .. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Town Hail, 53095 Main Road -_ Bennett Orlowski.Jr. - - 3 -, ��� - P. O. Box 1179 Mark S.McDonald Southold,New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 18x3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: June 24, 1993 is notice is issued ursuant to Part to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) the of of the Environmental) Conservation ations Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Title of Action: Minor.Subdivision Joseph Frederick Gazza East Marion, New York SEQR Status: Type I Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves a subdivision of 4.915 acres into two (2) lots. The project site is in a Critical Environmental Area and contains wetlands associated with Dam Pond. Four additional subdivision projects are pending in the same geographic area and will involve common and potentially significant impacts. SCTM Number: 1000-22-3-19 Location: The site consists of 4.915 acres and is located west of Dam Pond beginning at a point 1,414.51 feet north of Main Road that is 1,950 feet east of Stars Road, East Marion. W Joseph Frederick Gazza SEQR Determination Comments: The Planning Board is reviewing this project simultaneously with the following applications: Minor Subdivisio of Andrew Lettieri SCTM # 1000-31-5-1.2 Minor Subdivision of Bernice Lettieri SCTM # 1000-22-3-20 Minor Subdivision of Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # 1000-22-3-21 Minor Subdivision of Grundbesitzer Corp. & Andrew Lettieri SCTM # 1000-22-3-22 Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: (1) The project has been evaluated through a Long EAF Part III which discusses in detail environmental and planning aspects of the project. (2) The action(s) will result in significant loss of open space in a Town and County designated Critical Environmental Area which contains unique habitat and resources associated with Dam Pond. (3) The action(s) will result in impairment of the viability of unique habitat areas including overgrown field, tidal wetlands, dunelands and first growth woods. The diversity of habitats and the fragmentation and loss of same represents a significant ecological impact. (4) The action(s) may cause impact to the surface waters of Dam Pond in the form of erosion and sedimentation, stormwater runoff, and nitrogen load. In addition the actions will require water supply and use in an area of limited water supply potential. (5) The action should be considered in a context which will seek to maximize open space retention in a sensitive Critical Environmental Area through coordination of contiguous open space with adjoining parcels including Cove Beach Estates and four (4) additional currently pending subdivisions noted herein. . 6) The actions will cause potential visual impacts. 7) The action�s� require common access and will share some utilities and impacts. The viability of the access from the Andrew Lettieri parcel to other parcels to the north has been questioned by the Town Trustees as this access may require a road crossing over Trustees land -- an action which the Trustees have indicated they are not inclined to permit. Access to the subject Joseph Frederick Gazza piece as proposed requires this wetlands road crossing. (8) An environmental impact statement would permit the proper consideration of generic impacts associated with the combination of the five (5) projects, and allow for reasonable mitigation measures and-alternatives to be explored. For Further Information: Contact Person: Richard Ward, Chairman, Planning Board Town of Southold Page 2 of 3 Joseph Frederick Cazza SEQR Determination Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone No.: (516) 765-1801 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12231 Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation, SUNY @ Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission NYS Dept. Transportation, John A. Falotico, Veterans Memorial Highway, Hauppauge, NY 11788 NYS Dept. of State, Mohabir Persaud, 162 Washington Ave., Albany, NY 12231-0001 Applicant Page 3 of 3 .. < tivi Fij/.( .� \tip tF O L. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS " _ SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Richard G.Ward,chairman George Ritchie Latham,Jr. .; . Town Hall. 53095 Main Road - - Bennett Orlowski,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Mark S.McDonald Kenneth L Edwards Southold, New York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: June 24, 1993 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Title of Action: Minor Subdivision Joseph Frederick Gazza -2 East Marion, New York SEQR Status: Type I Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves a subdivision of 5.393 acres into two (2) lots. The project site is in a Critical Environmental Area and contains wetlands associated with Dam Pond. Four additional subdivision projects are pending in the same geographic area and will involve common and potentially significant impacts. SCTM Number: 1000-22-3-21 Location: The site consists of 5.393 acres and is located north of an extension of Dam Pond beginning at a point 534.7 feet west of a point 1,170.81 feet north of Suffolk County Control Monument No 10-1243 on NYS Route 25, East Marion. Joseph Frederick Gazza -2 SEQR Determination Comments: The Planning Board is reviewing this project simultaneously with the following applications: Minor Subdivision of Andrew Lettieri SCTM # 1000-31-5-1.2 Minor Subdivision of Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # 1000-22-3-19 Minor Subdivision of Bernice Lettieri SCTM # 1000-22-3-20 Minor Subdivision of Grundbesitzer Corp. & Andrew Lettieri SCTM # 1000-22-3-22 Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: (1) The project has been evaluated through a Long EAF Part III which discusses in detail environmental and planning aspects of the project. (2) The action(s) will result in significant loss of open space in a Town and County designated Critical Environmental Area which contains unique habitat and resources associated with Dam Pond. (3) The action(s) will result in impairment of the viability of unique habitat areas including overgrown field, tidal wetlands, dunelands and first growth woods. The diversity of habitats and the fragmentation and loss of same represents a significant ecological impact. The site includes a significant tidal wetlands that intrudes into Lot 2, and emphasizes the sensitivity of the parcel. (4) The action(s) may cause impact to the surface waters of Dam Pond in the form of erosion and sedimentation, stormwater runoff, and nitrogen load. Groundwater is shallow beneath the site and may result in impacts from sanitary system installation. In addition the actions will require water supply and use in an area of limited water supply potential. (5) The action should be considered in a context which will seek to in open space retention in a sensitive Critical Environmental Area through coordination of contiguous open space with adjoining parcels including Cove Beach Estates and four (4) additional currently pending subdivisions noted herein. 6 The actions will cause potential visual impacts. 7� The action�s� require common access and will share some utilities and impacts. The viability of the access from the Bernice Lettieri parcel has been questioned by the Town Trustees as this access may require a road crossing over Trustees land -- an action which the Trustees have indicated they are not inclined to permit. Access to the subject Joseph Frederick Gazza piece as proposed requires this wetlands road crossing. (8) An environmental impact statement would permit theproper consideration of generic impacts associated with the combination of the five (5) projects, and allow for reasonable mitigation measures and alternatives to be explored. For Further Information: Page 2 of 3 :+ra Joseph Frederick Gazza -2 SEQR Determination Contact Person: Richard Ward, Chairman, Planning Board Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone No.: (516) 765-1801 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12231 Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation, SUNY @ Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission NYS Dept. Transportation, John A. Falotico, Veterans Memorial Highway, Hauppauge, NY 11788 NYS Dept. of State, Mohabir Persaud, 162 Washington Ave., Albany, NY 12231-0001 Applicant Page 3 of 3 JOSEPH FREDERICK GAllA MS ATTORNEY AT LAW t<S P.O. BOX 969 5 OGDEN LANE QUOGUE,NEW YORK 11959 I p (516)653-5766(DAY AND EVENING) So,JTkolb �ZawJ ( kA +,11✓9 Ceff 5o- �J� RIF Pru otcd IAbli NC{ a1V ra N Ar 0^A /U,.o h'.aVT /MA's:..✓ rs� zo 21 2'L 4 7/ - r /_ /. 2 War NYC. C�H:r M+.A.-� Wd1rd ff / S rei..r-r �.� aN' 1I a� K p.r.n✓i- t�M. `fc... �o A(1^� 1t`t�.p i..x LlP t,r ::u../ 2A Qe'f*�'.":^^^r'.,J -f.a— .t�a ^�,..•e r c F,v Trr�-� l�caa.- wAta,.` 1,7 r; ✓Hall prr�*„r� / lam t{ A- w !J l Marr I 1..� Pf f d•✓:� LA^/ ��i�L c. �arrd i /9.^c R v.4:Cn �d f� (welv+� V i v 7) J ,, 3 `UA J J la d NORTH FORK ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL Route 25 at Love Lane, PO Box 799, Mattituck, NY 11952 516-298-8880 August 4 , 1993 Richard G. Ward, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 re: Gazza, Lettieri Property Dam Pond, East Marion Dear Chairman Ward and Planning Board members, I am writing to express our concern regarding the action taken at the July 12, 1993 Planning Board meeting regarding the above mentioned project. As you will recall, rather than issue a Positive Declaration at that time, the Board instead permitted Mr . Gazza additional time to attempt to mitigate the environmental concerns outlined in the review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) . In particular, the issue of access (or lack thereof) to the property would be addressed by Mr . Gazza. We are extremely dismayed by this action. A conditioned negative declaration, which is what your action of July 12 could lead to, cannot be used in this case. This is a Type I Action in a Critical Environmental Area, containing wetlands. It is the function of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to further determine the significant impacts of this project, and at that time the applicant may attempt to mitigate those impacts. To allow the applicant to try to resolve the issues raised at this point would deprive the public of a full review of all potential impacts of this project. Furthermore, the applicant implied that the only "real" issue to be addressed was that of access. While it is true that this is a major concern -- in that the proposed road crosses wetlands -- this is not by any means the only factor which concerns us about this site. Some of the additional issues are briefly outlined as follows. The threat to Dam Pond through erosion and nitrogen contamination is a serious concern. The unique habitat currently provides nesting and foraging opportunities that will be put at extreme risk. Several of the parcels have depths to groundwater of only 5-6 feet -- resulting in the need for extensive fill before construction. Sanitary system installation could significantly impair both surface and groundwater. The presence of marsh and tidal wetlands on several of the sites requires setbacks that may preclude building on some of the proposed lots. a non-profit organization for the preservation of land, sea, air and quality of life printed on 100% recycled paper It is obvious that a site in such an environmentally fragile area requires an Environmental Impact Statement to fully consider the impacts of development. The LEAF only touches the most glaring concerns, the EIS will reveal the full significance of these impacts, at which time mitigation measures may be considered. The North Fork Environmental Council respectfully requests that the Planning Board issue a Positive Declaration for these five projects at your next meeting. We firmly believe that any other action would be a violation of the NYS Environmental Quality Review Act. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, �nd�aL e OL ivy NFEC Southold rdinator r aapra'I;Y PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS t SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard O.Wand,Chairman Supervisor Oem Ritchie Latham,Jr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. -k; Town Hall,53095 Main Road Ben �? -_ Mark S.McDonald �'-� �' P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 10, 1993 Joseph F. Gazza P.O. Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, NY 11959 Re: Proposed minor subdivision located at East Marion on Dam Pond: Joseph F. Gazza ( 1) Grundbesitzer Corp. & Andrew Lettieri Andrew Lettieri Bernice Lettieri Joseph F. Gazza (2) SCTM# 1000-22-3-19, 20, 21, 22 & 31-5-1. 2 Dear Mr. Gazza: At last night's public meeting, the Planning Board decided, at Your request, to reserve decision on the environmental determination for the above noted subdivisions until the next meeting on September 13 , 1993. Since you requested this delay, it is our understanding that you also agreed to waive your right to pursue action against this Board with regard to delaying of the determination until September 13 , 1993 . Sincerely, / ICTJ• 7/R� Richard G. Ward OOS Chairman - DE(: I IC: -i ND TRJ3T - - TEL 1.0 . :516-2c3-0235 g 9 , 93 16 :27 N0 . 005 P . 02 - PECONIC L.1: 4.D TRUST St( I.6 \h 30Jae6er la ne,P.O.&>x:08k,5outhampmn,NY 11969 (516)287-3195 P.x.(516)283-0235 PeJ ,I August 9, 1993 Iti:artrd'1Nard, Chairman t Sortf,old Town Planning Boaxd Tmur of Southold, Town Hall 5;31':9.5 Main Road ; S as tl old, New York 11971 11e: Lands of Lettieri and Gazza at Dam Pond, East Marion Derr W. Ward: Recently, John Halsey and I met with Joe Gazza to discuss the future use omd otnlr.ership of the above referenced property. Mr. Gazza expressed an interest in lcoid ig at alternatives to the full-yield subdivision plan which is currently being re,v vved by the Planning Board. The Peconic Land Trust would be interested in working with the owners t f the pre ,arty on a plan which provides the owners with a means to realize the equity. it their property whille also protecting the integrity and natural character of the land and sun o coding environment. I understand that the Fanning Board may be ready make a determination of si,gr,ilicance under SEQRA regulations with respect to the current plan, however„ It wctild like to request that you postpone making a decision in this regard for at le:rst one meiitlr or until the Peconic Land Trust has had the opportunity to review some alternatives with the owners. Please call if you have artyquestions. Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, ( / i� Timo au 'el Assistant Director cc: Joe Gazza i ► ► r • • QV-( Pb THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF SUFFOLK COUNTY July 15 , 1993 To : Town of Southold Planning Department and Planning Board Members RE: DAM POND PROJECTS : SCTM #1000 , 22-3-19, 20, 21 On behalf of the local league, based on our in depth studies of surface and ground water, we urge you to do a comprehensive study and render "positive declarations" on said projects . The fragile ecosystem in the Dam Pond area and the impact of proposed projects should be reviewed prior to any decision. Thank you for your attention to our concerns . Sincerely, Johanna Northh1am PO Box 1053 Natural Resource Chair Southold NY 11971 765-5971 i � �r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ` z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ,3, � ,_ Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �'�-fJ� 141 , Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July 13 , 1993 Joseph F. Gazza P.O. Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, NY 11959 Re: Proposed minor subdivision located at East Marion on Dam Pond: Joseph F. Gazza ( 1) Grundbesitzer Corp. & Andrew Lettieri Andrew Lettieri Bernice Lettieri Joseph F. Gazza (2) SCTM# 1000-22-3-19, 20, 21, 22 & 31-5-1. 2 Dear Mr. Gazza: The Planning Board at its July 12, 1993 meeting decided to reserve decision on the environmental determination for the above noted subdivisions until the next meeting on August 9, 1993 in order to obtain the advice of the Town' s legal counsel regarding your inquiry. In order to answer your inquiry, the Board will not be able to act on your determination within the thirty day time frame set forth in the Environmental Quality Review Act. At last night's meeting, you agreed to waive your right to pursue action against this Board with regard to delaying of the determination only until August 9, 1993 . Sincerely, ' '' O'er/ t,�rj /# GU +�1 S Richard G. Ward Chairman CC: Harvey A. Arnoff, Town Attorney Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney CRAMER, S CTAT C. Environmental & Planning Cons 54 N. Country Road Suite 2 MILLER PLACE, NEW YORK 11764 DATE JOB NO. (516) 331-1455 June 29 1993 ATTENTION TO _ Town of Southold _ Richard Ward Chairman Plannin RE: P.O. Box 1179 Dam Pond @ E. Marion Southold, NY__ 11971 WE ARE SENDING YOU p Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ® Report _ COPIES OATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 ea 6/24/93 Review of 5 subdivision projects: Joseph F. Gazza Grundbesitzer Corp. Andrew Lettieri Bernice Lettieri Joseph F. Gazza 1 6/25/93 1337 Invoice THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval > IR For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution Il As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19— ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO SIGNED: les J. Voorhis, CEP, AICD AOOOOTM i��.c.a"o..um.0101 TO O(e PHONE Toe FREE tem-2m" If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us at once. • + Su®Fri Ppb CRAMER, VSOCIATES Y4.5ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS June 24, 1993 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review of EAF for Minor Subdivision ` i" JUN 3 01993 located at East Marion on Dam Pond Joseph Frederick Gazza SCPM No. 1000-22-3-19 sou ;+o is PL0. .IvG BOA10 Dear Mr. Ward: As per the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with your request. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part 11 LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Environmental and Planning Considerations The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The site consists of 4.915 acres and is located west of Dam Pond beginning at a point 1,414.51 feet north of Main Road that is 1,950 feet east of Stars Road, East Marion. The proposed subdivision involves dividing the 4.915 acre parcel into two (2) lots. Lot sizes are 90,000 square feet and 108,000 square feet. Proposed Lot 2 is a "flag" lot configuration with a 162 x 25 foot access strip. Lot 1 includes an isolated portion to the southeast of an access road that bisects the site. The purpose and potential use of this separate piece should be identified. The site is zoned "A-80" requiring lots a minimum of 80,000 square feet in size. The subject parcel is comprised of relatively flat topography with slopes generally less than 10 percent. The majority of the site has Plymouth loamy sand,with a small area of Carver Plymouth sand on the south side of the parcel. Subsoils are characterized as sand with no impediment to leaching capability. The elevation of water beneath the site is 1-2 feet indicating that the depth to water averages 10-15 feet on Lot 1 and 15-20 feet on Lot 2. The site was utilized for agricultural purposes in the past; however, at present the upland portions of the site are characteristic of an abandoned field. Typical pioneer species have overgrown the site including herbaceous weeds, black cherry and honeylocust. The eastern part of the site contains more dune oriented vegetation including bayberry. The site is utilized by field oriented bird and mammal species. A Page 1 of 3 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Joseph Frederick Gazza Long EAF Review portion of the site corresponding to the south part of Lot 1 includes High Marsh and Intertidal Marsh. These areas have been delineated and are subject to the jurisdiction of the Town Trustees and the NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). The site is not within the North Fork Water Budget Area, and no community or public water supply is available. Therefore, the site will have to rely on private water supj)ly. The area including the subject site does not appear to be affected by farming activities as the North Fork Water Supply Plan does I14I identify the area groundwater as having nitrate concentrations in excess of 8 mg/l and aldicarb concentrations in excess of 7 ug/1. The potential for on-site wells as water supply may be affected by chloride concentrations as a result of underlying salty groundwater. The subject use will need to ensure that adequate water supply can be provided. Application for a realty subdivision must be filed with Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). The site is bordered on the north by presently vacant forested lands of the Cove Beach Estates subdivision. The portion of Cove Beach Estates bordering the site is proposed as an open space area. To the west the site borders the rear of two lots that are part of the Cove Beach Estates subdivision. To the east are other vacant lands which are pending subdivision review by the Town Planning Board (under the name of Bernice Lettieri). The subject parcel requires access from a parcel to the south which is pending subdivision review under the name Andrew Lettieri. The subject project is one of five (5) projects pending in the area, and gains access from the abutting lot to the south, and provides access to the three additional applications to the east. The proposed project in itself will result in the loss of open space and field habitat, and could potentially impact significant tidal wetlands on the south part of Lot 1. The design and configuration of this parcel is particularly important due to the open space lands involved in the Cove Beach Estates property to the north. Proper environmental planning encourages expansion of open space continuum by aligning contiguous open space between land use proposals. The access road will induce growth in the area by providing ingress/egress for the aforementioned projects. These impacts are moderately significant on their own; however, when considered in the context of the four (4) additional pending projects, the subject application is expected to have a significant impact on the environment. The SEQR Regulations contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.15 for Generic Environmental Impact Statements indicate that, "...a generic EIS may be used to assess the environmental effects of: (1) a number of separate actions in a given geographical area which,if considered singly may have minor effects,but if considered together may have significant effects;or (2) a sequence of actions, contemplated by a single agency or individual;or (3) separate actions having generic or common impacts;or (4) an entire program or plan having wide application restricting the rang of future alternative policies or projects. The proposed action together with the four (4) additional subdivisions in the area will CRAMER, V OCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 2 of 3 0 Joseph Frederick Gazza Long EAF Review most certainly have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: (1) The action(s)will result in significant loss of open space in a Town and County designated Critical Environmental Area which contains unique habitat and resources associated with Dam Pond. (2) The action(s)will result in impairment of the viability of unique habitat areas including overgrown field,tidal wetlands,dunelands and first growth woods. The diversity of habitats and the fragmentation and loss of same represents a significant ecological impact. (3) The action(s) may cause impact to the surface waters of Dam Pond in the form of erosion and sedimentation,stormwater runoff,and nitrogen load. In addition the actions will require water supply and use in an area of limited water supply potential. (4) The action should be considered in a context which will seek to maximize open space retention in a sensitive Critical Environmental Area through coordination of contiguous open space with adjoining parcels including Cove Beach Estates and four(4) additional currently pending subdivisions noted herein. (5) The action(s)will cause potential visual impacts. (6) The action(s) require common access and will share some utilities and impacts. The viability of the access from the Andrew Lettieri parcel to other parcels to the north has been questioned by the Town Trustees as this access may require a road crossing over Trustees land--an action which the Trustees have indicated they are not inclined to permit. Access to the subject Joseph Frederick Gazza piece as proposed requires this wetlands road crossing. (7) An environmental impact statement would permit the proper consideration of generic impacts associated with the combination of the five(5)projects,and allow for reasonable mitigation measures and alternatives to be explored. Based upon the above reasons, it is evident that the proposed project must be reviewed in detail as to the environmental impacts of the action. This review must consider the project in the context of other pending applications as at least two (2) of the above noted reasons for requiring a Generic EIS are applicable; namely: separate actions in a given geographic area which when considered together will have a significant effect; and, separate actions having generic or common impacts. The State Environmental Quality Review Act requires that a Determination of Significance be issued for a project involving a decision by a Planning Board. In the case of the Joseph Frederick Gazza project, it is recommended that a Positive Declaration be issued. Said Positive Declaration should make note of site specific as well as generic impacts and should form the basis for a Generic Environmental Impact Statement in connection with individual review of other pending projects. If you are in agreement, I have enclosed a Positive Declaration for your use. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. Ve s, C es J. Vooyl is,CEP,AICP CRAMER, VOCIATES ENVIRONMENT GCONSULTANTS Page 3of3 SEQR POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: June 24, 1993 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Title of Action: Minor Subdivision Joseph Frederick Gazza East Marion, New York SEQR Status: Type I Action Project Description: Theproject which is the subject of this Determination, involves a subdivision of 4.915 acres into two (2) lots. The project site is in a Critical Environmental Area and contains wetlands associated with Dam Pond. Four additional subdivision Projects are pending in the same geo&raphic area and will involve common and potentially significant impacts. SCTM Number: 1000-22-3-19 Location: The site consists of 4.915 acres and is located west of Dam Pond beginning at a point 1,414.51 feet north of Main Road that is 1,950 feet east of Stars Road, East Marion. Page 1 of 3 0 Joseph Frederick Gazza SEQR Determination Comments: The Planning Board is reviewing this project simultaneously with the following applications: Minor Subdivisio of Andrew Lettieri SCTM # 1000-31-5-1.2 Minor Subdivision of Bernice Lettieri SCTM # 1000-22-3-20 Minor Subdivision of Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # 1000-22-3-21 Minor Subdivision of Grundbesitzer Corp. & Andrew Lettieri SCTM # 1000-22-3-22 Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: (1) The project has been evaluated through a Long EAF Part III which discusses in detail environmental and planning aspects of the project. (2) The action(s)will result in significant loss of open space in a Town and County designated Critical Environmental Area which contains unique habitat and resources associated with Dam Pond. (3) The action(s) will result in impairment of the viability of unique habitat areas including overgrown field, tidal wetlands, dunelands and first growth woods. The diversity of habitats and the fragmentation and loss of same represents a significant ecological impact. (4) The action(s) may cause impact to the surface waters of Dam Pond in the form of erosion and sedimentation, stormwater runoff, and nitrogen load. In addition the actions will require water supply and use in an area of limited water supply potential. (5) The action should be considered in a context which will seek to maximize open space retention in a sensitive Critical Environmental Area through coordination of contiguous open space with adjoining parcels including Cove Beach Estates and four (4) additional currently pending subdivisions noted herein. (6) The actions)will cause potential visual impacts. 7 The actions require common access and will share some utilities and impacts. The viability of the access from the Andrew Lettieri parcel to other parcels to the north has been questioned by the Town Trustees as this access may require a road crossing over Trustees land -- an action which the Trustees have indicated they are not inclined to permit. Access to the subject Joseph Frederick Gazza piece as proposed requires this wetlands road crossing. (8) An environmental impact statement would permit the proper consideration of generic impacts associated with the combination of the five (5) projects, and allow for reasonable mitigation measures and alternatives to be explored. For Further Information: Contact Person: Richard Ward, Chairman, Planning Board Town of Southold Page 2 of 3 Joseph Frederick Gazza SEQR Determination Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone No.: (516) 765-1801 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12231 Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation, SUNY @ Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission NYS Dept. Transportation, John A. Falotico, Veterans Memorial Highway, Hauppauge, NY 11788 NYS Dept. of State, Mohabir Persaud, 162 Washington Ave., Albany, NY 12231-0001 Applicant Page 3 of 3 • 0 suPFi�cS. COLONIAL NORTH AMERICAN 17 Mercer Street HACKENSACK, NEW JERSEY 07601 Telephone 201-343-5777 Fax 201-343-1934 May 26, 1993 Planning Board Office Re: Proposed Minor Subdivisions Town Hall, 53095 Main Road located at Fast Marion on P.O. Box 1179 Dam Pond: SCIV 1000-22-3-199 Southold, New York 11971 20, 21, 22 and 31-5-1.2 Att: Richard G. Ward Dear Mr. Ward, This is our written authorization to have Mr. Joseph Frederick Gazza act on our behalf in this matter. Sincerely, G U- Andrew Lettier Bernice Lettieri 1. MAY 2 81993 a Cf1J, :w s AGENT FOR nOIthAln6rIC8fIppUAN LINES • fes,... • u ;tIFFr3( n PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS _ Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman - �= "�' T��� SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. °"�� 3 . y?,i, Richard G. Wards - ->—n,�"�.✓'! Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 18, 1993 Joseph Frederick Gazza P.O.Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, New York 11959 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivisions located at East Marion on Dam Pond: Joseph Frederick Gazza Grundbesitzer Corp. and Andrew Lettieri Andrew Lettieri Bernice Lettieri Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # ""4 a, ,. - Y 21• 22 and ilI Dear Mr. Gazza: This is to acknowledge receipt of your check for $1, 500. 00 as payment for the review of the long environmental assessment forms for the above-noted subdivision applications. Our environmental consultant is being notified to begin the review. In closing, I must remind you that we have not received written authorization for you to act on behalf of Andrew Lettieri and Bernice Lettieri, respectively. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS v ,*, v +:: , _�; SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman , Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. "�� -�� 1..- .. .3 ,v��N Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark McDoDonaldnald P.O. Box 1179 Kennethh L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 18, 1993 Charles Voorhis Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. 54 North Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivisions located at East Marion on Dam Pond: Joseph Frederick Gazza Grundbesitzer Corp. and Andrew Lettieri Andrew Lettieri Bernice Lettieri Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # 1 - 71, 22 and I Dear Mr. Voorhis: In February 1992, this office referred to your firm, five long environmental assessment forms, maps and other relevant documentation pertinent to the environmental review of the above noted subdivision applications. This is to acknowledge receipt of a check for $1 , 500. 00 from the applicants for the environmental review of same. Please proceed with the review. If additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call Valerie Scopaz. Sincerely, Rich/�G�ard S Chairman Enc. Referral letter of February 4, 1992 h C2 Gym PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti _ SCOTT L. ILARI2lS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. JOSEPH FREDERICK GAZZA-ATTY. so-546/214 Richard G. Ward j P.O. [30% 969, 5 OGDEN LANE 416 2 Mark S. McDonald OUOGUE, NY 11959 Kenneth L. Edwards PH. 516-653-5766 � PTY TO THE 193 omni oP_ �w I f TLIJ Telephone (516) 765-1939 UU. 1=.Flamm ��..�1n1 DOLLARS ! 4,•Wa; Tp:MI?'fYl1.K COUIYry ryA7101VApOMIK 4� Joseph Frederick, 'I ,.�_. P.O. Do )",4 - 3 Odqen ...uir : 4[75461,t: 32 CC) i55 > --- Quogue, RE: Proposed Minor Subdivisions located at East Marion on Dam Pond Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM#1000-22-3-19 Bernice Lettieri SCTM#1000-22-3-20 Joseph Frederick Gazza ( - SCTM#1000-22-3-21 P Grundbesitzer Corporation and Andrew Lettieri SCTM#1000-22-3-22 Andrew Lettieri ri , MA1 SCTM#1000-31-5-1.2 Dear Mr. Gazza: This letter is in reference to the Board' s letter to you of April 9 , 1992, (copy enclosed) , requesting the environmental til review by its consultants. N arn State Environmental Quality Review Act was started in December 1991 and has not moved forward due to lack of payment of the environmental review fees. = (C< o>'� H W,. L4 Please indicate in writing whether you wish to proceed or W Will 0.-W40 tozi close the file. If you decide to proceed, the review fee is e I mi-I $300. 00 per application made out to the Town of Southold for the = LLo x l total amount of $1500.00 . do Ir ti �� L I J 1` -i- �fwu+t d C�. f" q/G 1'- f" /4,z O PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y { ' a ^� Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS ✓ qb Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �'�Q a� . Richard G. Ward - Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L.. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 24, 1993 Joseph Frederick Gazza P.O.Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, New York 11959 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivisions located at East Marion on Dam Pond. Joseph Frederick Gazza Grundbesitzer Corp. and Andrew Lettieri Andrew Lettieri Bernice Lettieri Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # 1000-22-3-19, 20, 21, 22 and 31-5-1. 2 Dear Mr. Gazza: This is in response to your telephone call indicating that Mr. Lettieri would not be able to attend the Planning Board's March 22nd meeting. This is to confirm that you have rescheduled your joint meeting with the Planning Board to the close of its May 3rd public meeting. The meeting will start at 7 : 30. It is suggested that you be there shortly thereafter. S/ipcerely, !V/al�eri2 Scopay� Town Planner H PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSr " r Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald `"'== `'` Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 17 , 1993 Mr. Joseph Frederick Gazza Attorney at Law P.O. Box 969 5 Ogden Lane Quogue, NY 11959 Dear Mr. Gazza; This is to confirm that the Planning Board will be available to speak with you and Mr. Letterri at the close of its March 22nd meeting at Town Hall. The meeting will start at 7: 30 PM. I suggest you arrive shortly thereafter. I apologize for the lateness of this letter but staff has been unsuccessful in reaching you by telephone for the last week. Sincerely,/ Valerie Scop/az «c///7f Town Planner 6uBFic.E JOSEPH FREDERICK GAllA GPj V5 ATTORNEY AT LAW 75 P.O. BOX 969 S OGDEN LANE QUOGUE, NEW YORK 11959 (516)653-5766 (DAY AND EVENING) February 13 , 1993 Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision at Dam Pond East Marion Dear Mr. Chairman Ward, I am in receipt of your letter D. 1/15/93 pertaining to the above referenced and have discussed same with Mr. Lettieri at Florida . Mr. Letteri and I respectfully request to appear before your Board to discuss this matter in March at a date that is convenient for your Board. I am available to meet with the Board sooner however Mr. Lettieri will only be returning to New York in March. Thank you for ^^ consideration to this request. Very yo rs,r \\ I JOSEPH FRDERICK GAZZA i cc : Andrew Lettieri 48 Cayuga Road Yonkers , New York 10701 R324MO SOUTHOLD104VN PLANNING 60AR0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS w ' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman ' - O�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. "�f �. Richard G. Ward 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1993 Joseph Frederick Gazza P.O. Box 969 3 Odgen Lane Quogue, NY 11959 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivisions located at East Marion on Dam Pond Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM#1000-22-3-19 Bernice Lettieri SCTM#1000-22-3-20 Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM#1000-22-3-21 Grundbesitzer Corporation and Andrew Lettieri SCTM#1000-22-3-22 Andrew Lettieri SCTM#1000-31-5-1. 2 Dear Mr. Gazza: This letter is in reference to the Board' s letter to you of April 9, 1992, (copy enclosed) , requesting the environmental review by its consultants. State Environmental Quality Review Act was started in December 1991 and has not moved forward due to lack of payment of the environmental review fees. Please indicate in writing whether you wish to proceed or close the file. If you decide to proceed, the review fee is $300. 00 per application made out to the Town of Southold for the total amount of $1500. 00. Page 2 Proposed minor subdivision located at East Marion on Dam Pond Joseph Frederick Gazza If you have any questions please so not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Richard G. Ward Chairman Encl. o - 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS t ` SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O '' dj ' .`. C George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �_!+ '��� �� Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall. 53095 P.O. Box 1 Main Roar Kenneth L. Edwards 179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 9, 1992 Joseph Frederick GaZZa P.O.Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, New York 11959 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivisions located at East Marion on Dam Pond. Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # 1000-22-3-19, 20, 21 , 22 and 31-5-1. 2 Dear Mr. Gazza: This is in response to your letters of March 10th and MArch 25th, 1992 . First, the justifications for the Planning Board' s position vis-a-vis the classification of these applications and need for an environmental review by its consultants have been set forth in past correspondence. Second, the Southold Town Planning Board has not been able to complete its review of the environmentally related issues because the environmental review fee has not been paid. Upon receipt of payment, the Board will authorize its consultant to proceed. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Andrew Lettieri Bernice Lettieri it JOSEPH FREDERICK GAZZA 106 ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O. Box 969 5 OGDEN LANE QUOGUE.NEW YORK 11959 (516)653-5766(DAY AND EVENING) Southold Town Planning Board " yW0iFI0LDTOWN 53095 Main Road ►�NNI NQ_Southold , New York 11971 Re: Pending minor subdivision application at Dam Pond , East Marion Section #1000-022-03-019, 020, 021 , 022 and 031-05-1 .2 Dear Board Members, The above referenced minor subdivision application has been pending with your board since July 16th, 1985 . During the course of your 6 3/4 years review of these applications the major obstacle to obtaining approval of the division as been access . It is obvious to any reviewer of the above referenced that the proposed subdivision and road system of the adjacent tract of land "Cove Beach Estates" should be coordinated with our subdivision. -Your board has failed to even attempt to coordinate the road systems of adjacent subdivi- sions . The undersigned has , since 12-6-1981 ,requested in writing to your board eleven ( 11 ) times to provide for a common road system rather than two roads running parallel''with others over 1200 feet. The NYS DEC had on 9-20-1991 outlined by lettir (copy attached) that the roadway as proposed independently on our subdivisions could be expected to adversely impact tidal wetlands and recommended that access to our property be by using the proposed street or the adja- cent property to the west , Cove Beach Estates . The DEC continued in 4 A that the Cove Beach Road would be the most efficient as well as the most environmentally sound solution . The Southold Town Trustees have informed your board on 1-21-92 that they are not in favor of our proposed road system in the area where it crosses the wetland area and further that this wetland. area may in fact be trustee land and not available for road access . It is apparent to the undersigned that your board is oblivious to my eleven requests and the requests of the NYS DEC and Southold Town Trustees , which all uniformly agree that a coordinated road system be designed to promote proper planning and safeguard environ- mentally fragile areas . Your board 's failure to provide even a "spur" to allow interconnection of adjacent subdivision and road systems 'Y rw between Cove Beach Estates and our lands amounts tox r. poor planRinQ. I respectfully request that your board reconsider the access issues set forth above prior to your granting final approval to the Cove Beach Estates subdivision map and road access system. I am available to meet with your board to discuss this issue at your convenience . Surveys depicting coordinated road systems have been previously submitted by the undersigned. to your board . Please advise, r.` r cc: Andrew and Bernice Lettieri / 14 48 Cayuga Road Yonkers , New York 1D1#0 Jonsen G zza encl . �/�a�v lki�` �b rzuazcir encY via : Certified Mail RRR LS0" k14La-.;=e� SENDER: Complete Items 1 slid el when auumunu, adrwiw. 3 and 4. Certified Mall Recei t ;lut being dies,etured toe ou re EThe return re Daea foR I rovi aiou{h�ainemeo do tele wlcl pr No Insurance Coverage Pro e o li er . For atl mons eee pT owmg services are a aTaGln• onw I Po in Do not use for International .'in c Show io whom delivered,additional crvi e, end add sues',address. 2. [3Restricted Deli _ (See Reverse) (Erma charge) (Evia charge) s rw` _ 4. Article Number .{ � Article Addressed to: , —1P'ro a 3 7� srrearAne jOUTNo 1.� TOWt'1 PIPnNNi/VG pe ofServlre: TC9r Ma.— Air J� Istewrtad ,Q Return Recei a£g:•. Pe.,S1.1.a ZIP coda 0, f r Ma AhU Hw{. llq�� souTl'+�1 d / /�� 1 ( ':�?J9 p400, all " Mer h Ise - Posreae _ @ ws •O��Y�I".jsignalurs of addisuea nt seD uATE DELIVERED.''` Cerured Fee I Cie— ddressees Address (ONLY i( 4'.." 5. Signature —Addressee f aetred artd fee paid) $p!eial Deliverr Fee X - 3d 9 Reeekred Delivery Fee 5. Sign a —`Agent ^4Gcy �• `^'�» r �, tt. ' M 1 h e UT RflCPinr RhoMp 'L ' V, nal R aore fr, ��- 7 vate of Delivery .. _ J, w 4,> > m Re Rece 110 whom, DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT m Daie•8 resso eU.5.0.D.0.leaF]aea15 PS Form 3811, Apr. 1989 p eFeesMi �ri ad Postman r a4' EL At .t : r ..♦ '^.^. >,.. k> ..n , ) �..' . - ' e j`7=1s .riy+^ ! g..t' `:FrM fir i � O ie lei i a :'tijp o Icily' w h •20, \�o �i \ F u .. •+ O � :'v� sd•'N , ' .. 40� � 3°JI•III �'> ^ i = •moi • — m � Y. "_ i ' i i' °' r,G' Fi` 3 qa S3< i ° 2f• I n D^ e♦ . 'W � � � D . Oal �e' 1• � 6• � 'l i.. S Dti 4 sa 9..• rv•a ' O .ii,.. • �� E� Se •y e h � n� I ,� - - •, - 1 ..w .4 v Ee Ey 1 �;..Va•, f 4 F i i l J c. � ,.7. .V" ,y •.9 � 'yry s ? s 3 ��a "°4' 7; i'� I I I I t rill !' a 4' a ..s 0 •av c 1 r I � t � i H 1 � • n a 6' ., 8� t C � _ 2� Ao �o� •• C� 'oh d JI#f 3 • R•�i �o015Dff0(� ell oyJ, f 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS w . SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman u0 Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ���� `�bO Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 P.O. Box I Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards 179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 9, 1992 Joseph Frederick Gazza P.O.Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, New York 11959 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivisions located at East Marion on Dam Pond. Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # 1000-22-3-19, 20, 21, 22 and 31-5-1. 2 Dear Mr. Gazza: This is in response to your letters of March 10th and MArch 25th, 1992 . First, the justifications for the Planning Board' s position vis-a-vis the classification of these applications and need for an environmental review by its consultants have been set forth in past correspondence. Second, the Southold Town Planning Board has not been able to complete its review of the environmentally related issues because the environmental review fee has not been paid. Upon receipt of payment, the Board will authorize its consultant to proceed. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Andrew Lettieri Bernice Lettieri Ale o��gUfHt4,cD 1115 TRUSTEES „y. " G,s llS John M.Bredemeyer,III,President o Ac SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith,Vice President W "`; SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J. Krupski,Jr. O �' John L. Bednoski,Jr. Town Hall John B.Tuthill a' 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 27, 1992 Joseph F. Gazza Attorney at Law P.O. Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, NY 11959 Re: SCTM #1000-22-3-20, 21, 22, 31-5-2 Dear Mr. Gazza: The Southold Town Trustees discussed your proposal to span town owned wetlands and waters in connection with your subdivision application, at some length, at our March 26, 1992 worksession. The Boards primary concerns surround wetland habitat fragmentation and potential degradation of the wetland associated with constructing homes and a road in this location. We believe these concerns can only be addressed through the SEQRA process and by comparing alternative development strategies. We do not want to overly encourage you in your endeavors for a road in this location. Absent a plan which would address our overall concerns for the site, which is contiguous to a Trustee designated Critical Environmental Area and a means of providing an easement which would clearly benefit the public (i.e. not provide an exclusive easement) we would be unable to help anyone wanting a road in this location. On face value, the Trustees might even have a problem with a public road in this location were the property entirely in public ownership. Any plans to develop the peninsula will have to take into account the possibility that the waters and nearshore areas of this "pond" are a finfish breeding area of considerable locgl importance. D U T N SOUTHOLD TOYdN PLANNING BOARD A resident population of white perch and immature striped bass exists in very close proximity to this wetlands on this parcel as a result of the unique water quality and habitats provided by this estuary. The waters of this creek system are directly impacted not only by the quality and quantity of groundwater inflow, but are tempered by Long Island Sound waters penetrating the course sand and gravel barrier beach at the north end of the pond in addition to the obvious influence of Orient Harbor and Gardeners Bay through the mouth of the creek. We would encourage any proposal which would preserve this peninsula, thus protecting the unique scenic attributes of this site and the attendant water quality and fisheries of the pond. As discussed briefly on field inspection, we anticipate the public outcry attendant with any proposed development plans for this site to be severe. If we can be of further assistance please do not hesitate to call. S ' erely, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees CC. Planning Board JMB/djh TRUSTEES John M.Bredemeyer,III,President SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith,Vice President ,ne SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski,Jr. G • 1 John L.Bednoski,Jr. y'8p1 ��4Town Hall John B.Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 27, 1992 Joseph F. GazzaAttorney at P.O. Box 969La3 Ogden Lane \1 M'AR 2 Quogue, NY 11959 SOUTHOLD TOWN Re: 22-3-20, 22-3-21, 22-3-22, 31-5-2 vLANNeaceoaaD Dear Mr. Gazza: The Southold Town Trustees discussed your proposal to span town owned wetlands and waters in connection with your subdivision application, at some length, at our March 26, 1992 worksession. The Boards primary concerns surround wetland habitat fragmentation and potential degradation of the wetland associated with constructing homes and a road in this location. We believe these concerns can only be addressed through the SEQRA process and by comparing alternative development strategies. We do not want to overly encourage you in your endeavors for a road in this location. Absent a plan which would address our overall concerns for the site, which is contiguous to a Trustee designated control environmental area and a means of providing an easement which would clearly benefit the public (ie) not provide an exclusive easement) we would be unable to help anyone wanting a road in this location. On face value, the Trustees might even have a problem for a public road in this location were the property entirely in public ownership. Any plans to develop the peninsula whatever will have to take into account the possibility that the waters and nearshore areas of this "pond" are a finfish breeding area of considerable local importance. A resident population of white perch and immature striped bass exists in very close proximity to this wetlands on this parcel as a result of the unique water quality and habitats provided by this estuary. The waters of this creek system are directly impacted not only by the quality and quantity of ground water inflow, but are tempered bj' Long Island Sound waters penetrating the course gravel Barren Beach at the north end of the pond and in addition to the obvious influence of Orient Harbor and Gardeners Bay through the mouth of the creek. we would encourage you in any proposal which would preserve this peninsula, thus protecting the unique scenic attributes of this site and the attendant water quality and fisheries of the pond. As discussed briefly on field inspection, we anticipate the public outcry attendant with any proposed development plans for this site to be severe. If we can be of further assistance please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees CC. Planning Board JMB/djh M JOSEPH FREDERICK GAllA • P� . ATTORNEY AT LAW n—TDYET— P.O. LS P.O. Box 969 5 OGDEN LANE QUOGUE, NEW YORK 11959 I IVVJ (516)653-5766(DAY AND EVENING) �''S,� h 7 SOUTHOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road 3 Z5-- ,32. Southold , New York 11971 Re : Pending minor subdivision application at Dam Pond, East Marion Section #1000-022-03-019 , 020, 021 , 022 and 031-05-1 . 2 Dear Board Members , The above referenced minor subdivision application has been pending with your board since July 16th, 1985 . During the course of your 6 3/4 years review of these applications the major obstacle to obtaining approval of the division as been access . It is obvious to any reviewer of the above referenced that the proposed subdivision and road system of the adjacent tract of land "Cove Beach Estates" should be coordinated with our subdivision. Your board has failed to even attempt to coordinate the road systems of adjacent subdivi- sions . The undersigned has , since 12-6-1981 ,requested in writing to your board eleven ( 11 ) times to provide for a common road system rather than two roads running parallel with others over 1200 feet . The NYS DEC had on 9-20-1991 outlined by letter (copy attached) that the roadway as proposed independently on our subdivisions could be expected to adversely impact tidal wetlands and recommended that access to our property be by using the proposed street or the adja- cent property to the west, Cove Beach Estates . The DEC continued in q A that the Cove Beach Road would be the most efficient as well as the most environmentally Sound solution . The Southold Town Trustees have informed your board on 1-21-92 that they are not in favor of our proposed road system in the area where it crosses the wetland area and further that this wetland area may in fact be trustee land and not available for road access . It is apparent to the undersigned that your board is oblivious to my eleven requests and the requests of the NYS DEC and Southold Town Trustees , which all uniformly agree that a coordinated road system be designed to promote proper planning and safeguard environ- mentally fragile areas . Your board ' s failure to provide even a "spur" to allow interconnection of adjacent subdivision and road systems between Cove Beach Estates and our lands amounts to poor planning. I respectfully request that your board reconsider the access issues set forth above prior to your granting final approval to the Cove Beach Estates subdivision map and road access system. I am available to meet with your board to discuss this issue at your convenience . surveys depicting coordinated road systems have been previously submitted by the undersigned to your board. Please advise, cc: Andrew and Bernice Lettieri 48 Cayuga Road Yonkers , New York Joseph G17Xza//'� encl . via : Certified Mail RRR New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11794 (516) 751-7900 0 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner July 3, 1989 Joseph F. Gazza, Esq. P. 0. Sox 969 3 Ogden La. Quogue, N.Y. 11959 Re: 10-87-1200 Dam Pond Subdivision Dear Mr. Gazza: I am writing to update you on the status of the referenced project. We appreciate the fact that the application has been pending for some time and are making every effort to bring the matter to a speedy conclusion. As we have recently discussed, the additional information provided in your January 17th letter has answered our questions abogt the Stage 1 Archaeological Survey. The survey is adequate. No further cultural resources information is necessary. i To proceed with our review of the project for a tidal wetlands permit, we must confirm the building envelope setbacks from the tidal wetlands edge. Please have the building envelopes staked as shown on the attached plan. As usual, the stakes should be labeled, this time with the appropriate letter as shown on the enclosed copy of the staking requirement plan. Please also provide information on the proposed access road. Will the road be widened or paved? In the vicinity of the wetland crossing, we will require that the road be surfaced with crushed stone or other pervious material. As previously stated; if improvements to the access road are proposed, please submit 3 copies of site plan and cross sectional views of the work. Please contact me when the building envelope stakes are set and you have decided what will be done with the access road. We will then re-inspect the site and proceed with our review. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, LX George George W. Hammarth Senior Environmental Analyst GWH:rw attachment cc: file /r /`` New York State Department Anvironmental Conservation /`. Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 (516) 751-1389 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner September 20, 1991 Joseph Frederick Gazza, Esq. P. 0. Rox 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, N.Y. 11959 RE: DEC Application 1110-87-1200 Dam Pond Subdivision, East Marion, Southold Dear Mr. Gazza: I am writing to update you on the status of the referenced application for a 'Tidal Wetlands permit to subdivide a 36 acre parcel on Dam Pond into 12 lots and construct an access road. To date, the site has been visited several times by Department staff for inspection and wetland boundary delineation. The issues of concern have been the proposed access road and the location/configuration of the building envelopes on several of the lots. My letter to you dated July 17, 1990, discussed the Department 's concerns about the roadway and several of the proposed lots. In response you sub- mitted detail drawings of the roadway and additional prints of the subdivision map updated with our field flagged tidal wetland boundary and the designations of the areas in question from the Tidal Wetlands Map. Our review of these items indicates that the roadway and building envelope issues are still unresolved. Roadway The detail drawings indicate that the section of roadway crossing the wetland area will be at least 40 feet wide. As stated in my July 17, 1990, letter, the Department objects to the construction of a 40 foot wide roadway across the wetlands because of the filling and wetland destruction involved. Also, we felt that a 40 foot wide roadway is not necessary to access a maximum of only nine homes. We have changed our position on the roadway to a hierarchy of alternatives based on the expected adverse impacts to tidal wetlands: (A) Gain access to the area of the subdivision north of the wetlands by using the proposed street on the adjacent property to the west, Cove Beach Associates. This road appears to run north, past the landward end of the tidal wetland area to a point where a roadway could be constructed eastward across lot 111 of the Grundbesitzer Corps west parcel to join the current alignment. This arrangement: will require the negotiation of an easement with the adjacent property owner, but seems to be the most efficient as well as the most environmentally sound solution. Joseph Frederick Gazza, Esq. September 20, 1991 r Page 2 (B) If alternative (A) proves impossible, construct a bridge to carry the current alignment of the proposed access road across the wetlands. The length of the proposed bridge does not appear to be excessive, and the only disturbance of wetland necessary would be for footings. (C) A very narrow, maximum width 20 feet , roadway surfaced with gravel through the wetland area. This roadway would have to be proposed in a manner that absolutely minimizes the amount of wetland area destroyed. The proposed 20 foot wide gravel roadway with 10 foot bulkheaded shoulders is not acceptable. To proceed, please submit a written statement evaluating alternatives A - C above and the currently proposed 40 foot wide roadway. The statement should explain, in as much detail as necessary, the feasibility of each of the four alternatives from an environmental, economic, practical (construction techniques, etc.) and legal (will all involved agencies' regulations allow the alternative?) standpoint. Please provide written documentation of any claims made. This evaluation of alternatives will lead to a chosen alternative. If the chosen alternative requires damage to the tidal wetlands (if alternative B - C, or the original are chosen) , the written statement must include an additional section acknowledging the fact that the alternative includes activities (filling, construction of bulkhead'ing, driving piles or footings) which are listed as presumptively incompatible with the preservation and protection of tidal wetlands and their values in 6NYCRR Part 661 .5 (Tidal Wetlands Land Use Regulations) . This section must demonstrate that the alternative chosen either: ( 1) Will not have an adverse impact on tidal wetlands and demonstrate how; or (2) The need for the project is so great that it overcomes the presumption of incompatibility assigned the activity in the regulations. If not already included in the alternative discussion, this is the section to elaborate on any requirements of other involved agencies which conflict with DEC's and to describe any mitigation measures proposed. Building Envelopes Please refer to the print of the subdivision map sent with my July 17, 1990, letter. This map indicates the locations of the required stakes A - CC for the field inspection. The July 17, 1990, letter includes a list of stakes which were found not to meet the 75 foot setback requirement of Part 661 .6. The latest subdivision map (received August 17, 1990) has not been updated to show all building envelopes a minimum of 75 feet landward of the tidal wetland boundary. Please see page 2 of the July 17, 1990, letter which lists each stake found to be less than 75 feet from the tidal wetland boundary. As can be seen from the marked print of the subdivision map, there are four lots which contain building envelopes which do not meet setbacks. Please relocate the building envelopes on these lots to meet the required 75 foot minimum setback. As the lots are all relatively large , it should be a fairly simple matter to redesign the envelopes to comply. Joseph Frederick Gazza, Esq. September 20, 1991 Page 3 Please be certain to measure setbacks from the DEC flagged tidal wetland boundary shown on the survey. Please discuss our requirements with the other applicants. If you have questions, please call me at 751-1389. Upon receipt of: — An acceptably revised subdivision map showing all building envelopes a minimum of 75 feet from the DEC flagged tidal wetland boundary and the roadway realigned through the Cove Beach property to avoid tidal wetlands; or — Revised subdivison map with correct building envelopes and the current road alignment with an acceptable bridge over wetlands; and — The alternative discussion/presumptively incompatible project evaluation, we will be able to proceed. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Very truly yours, George W. Hammarth Senior Environmental Analyst GWH/rw cc: file 4' JOSEPH FREDERICK GAZZA ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O.BOx 969 3 OGDEN LANE QUOGUE,NEW YORK 11959 (51 6)653-5766(DAY AND EVENING) March 10 , 1992 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Box 1179 Southold , New York 11971 Re: Five Minor Subdivision, situate at East Marion at Dam Pond Gazza and Lettieri Dear Mrs . Valerie Scopaz , The Lettieri ' s and I are truly frustrated with the ex- tensi%(�- review and review time that has elapsed over the past seven (7) years in connection with our simple minor subdivision request. The Lettieri ' s may believe that the delay is my fault howe ver , I have honestly been persistent to my best ability to get the various regulatory agencies to move forward with the applications . I am unable to convince Mr . Lettieri that a SEQRA review must be commenced for a third time on the application. He knows that the State Department of Environmental Conservation conducted their complete SEQRA review over a three ( 3 ) year period during the course of which your Board was repeatedly asked to join in for a coordinated review but never responded. I am perplexed how a Type I Action since November 24, 1987 could be reviewed uncoordinately without a lead agency determination , by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and , your Board to date . Possibly you could explain to me why the Planning Board did not conduct a timely coordinated review with the State Department of Environmental Conservation for this Type I action. Very truly yours , Joseph erick Gazza cc: Mr. and Mrs . Lettieri FP:SL(ANTN �� `BOA4 �t��SJf FD� C3 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS C � � Z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward �t � '0-- Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 4, 1992 Joseph Frederick Gazza P.O.Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, New York 11959 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivisions located at East Marion on Dam Pond. Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # 1000-22-3-19 Bernice Lettieri SCTM # 1000-22-3-20 Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # 1000-22-3-21 G.rundbesitzer Corporation and Andrew Lettieri SCTM # 1000-22-3-22 Andrew Lettieri SCTM # 1000-31-5-1. 2 Dear Mr. Gazza: This is in response to your letter of February 25, 1992 in which you protest payment of the environmental review fees that were quoted in our February 20th letter to you. Your letter questions the need for an environmental review by the Town. The attached letter from George W. Hammarth of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation explains why the Town must conduct its own environmental review. It also states that the "Town of Southold Planning Board must reach its own determination of significance. " In order for the Southold Town Planning Board to make a determination of significance, and complete the environmental review, it must review five long environmental assessment forms for five separate Type I actions. (The prior fee of $70 .00 was for the review of a short assessment form for an Unlisted action. ) The quoted fee per application is $300. 00. This charge is not covered by the initial application fees that you paid in 1985. The consultant will not be authorized to proceed until we receive your check( s) made out to the Town of Southold in the total amount of $1500. 00 or in separate checks of $300.00 apiece. In closing, it would be appreciated if you would send written authorizations from Andrew Lettieri and Bernice Lettieri to act as agent on their behalf. If you have any questions, please contact Valerie Scopaz. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. VS:vs cc: Andrew Lettieri Bernice Lettieri JOSEPH FREDERICK GAZZA �� d✓S ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O.BOX 969 3 OGDEN LANE QUOGUE.NEW YORK 11959 (516)653.5766(DAY AND EVENING) February 25 , 1992 Planning Board of Southold Town P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Environmental Consultant Review Fees SCTM#1000-22-3-19 to 22 8 31-5-1 . 2 Dear Mr. Chairman Orlowski , A full environmental review persuant to SEQR was conducted by the NYS DEC over the past 4 years including a Stage 1 Archaeological survey. I possess documentation whereby the DEC attempted coordinated review with the Town and the Town failed to comply with the DEC request. It appears from your letter of 6/19/89(copy attached ) that the Town ' s own Environmental Review Firm "Szepatowski Associates Inc. " did a duplicate SEQR review of this matter at our expense . The suggestion that a third review of this matter be conducted by a new firm as an agent for the Town (your letter of 2/20/92 ) at an additional cost of $1500 .00 to us is uncalled for. Please advise, JOSEPH E ER CK GAZZA Encl . CC : Andrew Lettieri 0 2 ��i� � 819� ! SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING 501, Z Town l l i L 53095 Main Road � • J. Box 1179 South( c . New York 11971 VV IF LEPIION E 1 i16) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 19, 1989 Joseph Gazza P.O. Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, N3 11959 RE: Gazza/Lettieri SCTM #1000-22-3-( 19-22) Dear Mr. Gazza: A review of our books indicates that the fees for the ongoing environmental review of the above-referenced project subject to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act have not been paid. I Enclosed you will find a copy of the bill that was sent to the Planning Board by its environmental consultant, Szepatowski Associates, Inc. for the review of the above-named project to date. It would be appreciated if you would submit the balance, which is $70. 00, to this office by July 3, 1989. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate t:o contact this office. �AZLa �I� cl+ M 2.77( y truly you BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. !/ , CHAIRMAN cc: James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney John A. Cushman, Town Accountant //'SZEPA IOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTAN[S awn ----------------------------------- DATE. Mr. Bennet Orlowski, Jr. 8/26/88 Planning Board Chairman Southold Town Hall NUMBER 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 DESCRIPTI( N - - - - --- AMOUNT Angel Shores $ 905.00 August Acres $ 615.00 Harold Reese/Cove Beach $ 885.00 Norris Property/Carr-wanat $ 900.00 Marina Bay Club T $ 70.00 Cedarfields $ 35. 00 Gazza/Lettieri S 35. 00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE _ $3445 .00 PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT THANK YOU OICE SZEPA IOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS +r? SSA ::f_I'� 3 n :1-3 PLANNING 80ARD DATE September 29, 198 Mr. Bennet Orlowski, Jr. NUMBER Planning Board Chairman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 DESCRIPI ON AMOUNT Angel Shores $ 70.00 Cove Beach Estates $ 455.00 Norris Property/Carr-Wanat $ 435 . 00 Tidemark/Cliffside $ 100.00 Hanauer . & Bagley $ 425 .00 Gazza/Lettieri $ 35.00' "'" TOTAL AMOUNT DUE _ $1520 .00 PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT THANK YOU bb�oSUFFot o o PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman _ �, Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. f'O �0� > Richard G. Ward �., J�i-{Y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald r `�"' P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 ^ebruary 20, 1992 Joseph Frederick Gazza P.O.Box 969 3 Ogden. Lane Quogue, New York 11959 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision located at East Marion on Dam Pond. Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # 1000-22-3-19 Dear Mr. Gazza: The Southold Town Planning Board has referred the Long Environmental Assessment Form and map for the above-named subdivision to its environmental consultant for review. The cost of this review will be three hundred ( $300) dollars. The consultant will be authorized to proceed once we receive your check made out to the Town of Southold in the amount stated above. If you have any questions, please contact Valerie Scopaz . Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman CRAMER, VC( OCIATES ENVIRONMENT alt G CONSULTANTS r/S February 18, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Requests for cost estimates for five subdivision applications under the names of„oseph Frederick C.,azza (2 applications), Bernice Letticri,Andrew I utticri, and ^vrundhesitzer and Andrew Uttieri. Dear Benny: As per my conversation with Valerie Scopaz, the fee to review the above referenced subdivision applications is $300.00 per project. If there is any questions or the reed for additional information please feel free to call. !!1 erely, J1 Q Charles J. Voorhis, CF-P,ATCP F700)AW s 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 JOSEPH FREDERICK GAZZA ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O.Box 969 3 OGDEN LANE QUOGUE.NEW YORK 11959 (516)653-5766(DAY AND EVENING) February 11, 1992 Board of Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed minor subdivisions Lettieri & Gazza SCTM# 1000-022-03-019,020,021,022 & 1000-031-05-001.2 Gentlemen, I represent the owners of the above referenced parcels of land which have been under minor subdivision review since 1985. It is unfortunate that I was not apprised that your Board would be discussing the above referenced "at some length" at your 1/16/1992 work session. Prior to your preparing any formal resolution regarding access to our lands I respectfully request the opportunity to address your Board on the following issues: 1. Fee Title ownership to the above referenced parcels as conveyed by Deeds throughout each lots chain of title describes land as shown on Suffolk County Tax Map(copy attached) . 2. The low land lying along the boundary lines of Lot 19 & Lot 001.2 has been designated by the NYS DEC as containing plant species that survive in a wetland area however this land area is not "underwater land".(*) 3. The ownership of lands of the Town of Southold is shown as "Darr Pond" on the tax map photocopy enclosed. By what document do you base your statement that the land along the boundary of Lot 19 & 1.002 is "Town Trustee Land" (P2 of 1/21/92 correspondence of Town Trustees to Town Planning Board. ) (*) The High water line of Dam Pond .is accurately shown on the County Tax Map and our surveys and does not extend west of the South West corner of Lot 20. 4. The early Title to the above referenced parcels can be traced to Seth H. Tuthill who designated this land the "Rocky Point Farm"'. On 3/20/1857 Joseph Lewis Tuthill & William S. Hobart Executors of the last will and testament of Seth H. Tuthill conveyed the "Rocky Point Farm at Liber 63 page 91 to Jonathan Truman & George Tuthill. George Tuthill who died in 1870 left a will recorded at Liber E Page 155 and Liber 10 page 602. George Tuthill's heirs at law were Henry H.C. Tuthill and Juliett M. Lamphear. In the early 1900's, Henry H.C.Tuthill & Juliett M. Lamphear by Deed Liber 458 page 402 divided the peninsula into lots as they appear on the tax map today. Rights of way to these lots via travelled farm roads have existed since their creation to the main road. The travelled farm road that crosses the lowland area of Lot 19 & 001.2 exists at an elevation of over 6ft. above mean sea level. This road provides ingress & egress for auto and truck, contains no wetlands on it and my individual use thereof has been uninterupted during my 14 years of ownership of Lots 19 & 21. The peninsula was farmed land and as such required continuous LUItIJAh;eN by farm equipment & tractors. The idea of restricting aN ew ..+.,w�5 fAA« ro,�d ti„w ;,• rbc o L ce y SAL i]cc.i,,, 0 to over 20 ac s for use only by foot(P3 your , etter S-r,)is a matter our attention will undoubtedly be focusing on at our meeting. Kindly advise when I may appear before your Board to discuss the above referenced. ResAectfully submitted, JOSEPH I GAZZA Encl. cc: Andrew & Bernice Lettieri i � ue0 �\ .0 _' '� --— —�- .e.p—• fir. eo• Nnw 101 '' /, ♦ °•V JURY t A- zz -;\u' �'� ...:' a ,ee" .e-.,.17 z e. N• n.L- .a Z— O5 �•w.a. B ,eV � ^ a" II •.f M1N t , ,, ' '� ,'• �' 'e' / YAR/ON CAREM1.4 E .J P• ;,`�' .• ,/ bio! MARION N LA • b� s 1i: 1� .° P '�. �o'\��✓. rtit rowN a�awrnou .. n, :,'�11% ��4� � �� .I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ��✓/ Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road 2� .i. Mark S. McDonald � � P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 4, 1992 Joseph Frederick Gazza, Esq. P.O. Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, New York 11959 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision located at East Marion on Dam Pond. SCTM # 1000-22-3-19 Joseph Frederick Gazza Dear Mr. Gazza: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at its meeting on Monday, February 3 , 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency status on this Type I action. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Board will wait for receipt of a report from the Board of Trustees regarding the accuracy of the wetlands line before proceeding with its determination. If you have any questions, please contact Valerie Scopaz. Sincerely, �J Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. Trustee Report CC: Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Department of Health Services (Attn: Robert DeLuca) N.Y.S.Department of Environmental Conservation - Allbany N.Y.S.Department of Environmental Conservation - Stony Brook (Attn: George Hammarth) N.Y.S Department of State (Attn: Mohabir Persaud) N.Y.S Department of Transportation (Attn: Charles Kilduff) TRUSTEES John M.Bredemeyer,III,Presidento j'`. y SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith,Vice President W T SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J.Krupski,Jr. �, t John L. Bednoski,Jr. � l�l ' , �® Town Hall John B.Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O.Box i t79 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Planning Board FROM: John Bredemeyer, I Board of Trustees [ (� RE: Proposed minor Subdivision: Bernice Lettieri SCTM #1000-22-3-21 IJ Grundbesitzer Corp. - Andrew Lettieri i SCTM #1000-22-3-22 SOUTRilDM! N Andrew Lettieri SCTM #1000-31-5-1. 2 P U01 raa+e a0� o DATE: January 21, 1992 The Southold Town Trustees concur with your classification of the above referenced proposed minor subdivisions as type I actions for being contiguous with our Town Trustee CEA. Additionally, this Board would like to go on record as opposed to the road or bridge or similar structure shown over Town Trustee land between the Andrew Lettieri and Joseph Gazza parcels. As in the case of Wade Vs. the Town Trustees, we are not inclined to permit any exclusive easement over Trustee owned underwater lands and wetlands. This item is not negotiable. The Board discussed this at some length during our January 16, 1992 work session and will prepare a formal resolution reflecting this consensus should you or the developer(s) request it. The Trustees will, however, not oppose reasonable uses such as catwalk ramp and float assemblies for individual or community use for small vessels or to bridge wetlands for access by foot. Since the wetlands have previously been delineated by the NYSDEC we are asking that Bruce Anderson, our environmental Consultant, confirm their accuracy. Provided the wetlands are properly designated, we may not require an additional natural resource review from Mr. Anderson should your Board retain its consultant for purpose of a review of the LEAF. Owing to the sensitive nature of this area, we would request that all buildings be located greater than 75 ' landward of the accepted wetland line and that the most stringent land use practices be encouraged though C & R' s. This Board will be interested in participating in any scoping session should one be necessary. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. cc: Bruce Anderson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn .' SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 'W"-�.. !� '° '�W t' t; Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward _ ( Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 4, 1992 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 North Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 Re: Attached requests for cost estimates for five subdivision applications under the names of Joseph Frederick Gazza ( 2 applications) , Bernice Lettieri, Andrew Lettieri, and Grundbesitzer and Andrew Lettieri. Dear Messeurs Cramer and Voorhis: As will become evident upon a reading of the enclosed materials, the Planning Board, the State Department of Environmental Conservation and the County Departme t of Health Services are reviewing these five separate applicaTLons together. It would be appreciated if you would take this into consideration in your estimate of time and cost of review. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman t - �- IS, THE MAP THAT ACCOMPANIED THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN PLACED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MAP FILE FOR THE FOLLOWING SUBDIVISIONS: 1000-22-3-19 1000-22-3-20 1000-22-3-21 1000-22-3-22 1000-31-5-1 . 2 cz PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn ` SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 0, h 'e� .�} � -ern^ Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward _ + Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald � �-i`' P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 4; 1992 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 North Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision located at East Marion on Dam Pond. SCTM # 1000-22-3-19 Joseph Frederick Gazza Dear Messuers Cramer and Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board refers the enclosed Long Environmental Assessment Form and map for the above-named subdivision to you for a cost estimate. Also enclosed for your information is the coordination form and correspondence from coordinating agencies. If you have any questions, please contact Valerie Scopaz. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encls. Coordination Letter Town Trustee Report Robert DeLuca' s Report: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Charles E. Kilduff ' s Report: N.Y.S. Department of Transportation Mohabir Persaud' s Report: N.Y. S. Department of State /C ' o�pgUFfD(�-BOG I�5 TRUSTEES John M.Bredemeyerr,III,President y� SUPERVISOR C5 t x SCOTT L. HARRIS Henry P. Smith,Vice President y, Albert J.Krupski,Jr. John L. Bednoski,Jr. �1Q1 �a0` Town Hall John B.Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Planning Board (� FROM: John Bredemeyer, IGY,", Board of Trustees// : RE: Proposed minor Subdivision: _ USONH Bernice Lettieri SCTM #1000-22-3 21Grundbesitzer Corp. - Andrew Lettieri SCTM #1000-22-3-22Andrew Lettieri SCTM #1000-31-5-1. 2 DATE: January 21, 1992 The Southold Town Trustees concur with your classification of the above referenced proposed minor subdivisions as type I actions for being contiguous with our Town Trustee CEA. Additionally, this Board would like to go on record as opposed to the road or bridge or similar structure shown over Town Trustee land between the Andrew Lettieri and Joseph Gazza parcels. As in the case of Wade Vs. the Town Trustees, we are not inclined to permit any exclusive easement over Trustee owned underwater lands and wetlands. This item is not negotiable. The Board discussed this at some length during our January 16, 1992 work session and will prepare a formal resolution reflecting this consensus should you or the developer(s) request it. The Trustees will, however, not oppose reasonable uses such as catwalk ramp and float assemblies for individual or community use for small vessels or to bridge wetlands for access by foot. Since the wetlands have previously been delineated by the NYSDEC we are asking that Bruce Anderson, our environmental Consultant, confirm their accuracy. Provided the wetlands are properly designated, we may not require an additional natural resource review from Mr. Anderson should your Board retain its consultant for purpose of a review of the LEAF. Owing to the sensitive nature of this area, we would request that all buildings be located greater than 75 ' landward of the accepted wetland line and that the most stringent land use practices be encouraged though C & R' s. This Board will be interested in participating in any scoping session should one be necessary. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. cc: Bruce Anderson COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 1/J Al 5 Robert J. Gaffney SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES Mary E. Hibberd, MD, MPH COMMISSIONER January 24, 1992 Valerie Scopaz,Town Planner Town of Southold, Planning Board Office Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Street - P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 RE: Dam Pond Resubmission (aka: Minor Subdivisions of B. Lettieri,J. Gazza, Gmundbesitzer &Lettieri, & A. Lettieri) SCTM#s: 1000-22-3-20, 1000-22-3-21, 1000-22-3-22, 1000-31-5-1.2 Dear Ms. Scopaz: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS)has received your letter of December 24, 1991,regarding the above-referenced application and has no objection to the Southold Town Planning Board's designation as lead agency. Based on the information reviewed, and the overall site location within a designated Critical Environmental Area(Peconic Estuary & Dam Pond),we believe that the magnitude and significance of potential environmental impacts is sufficient to warrant the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). We believe the DEIS process is the most responsible way to assess the potential impacts of the proposed overall site development, and to examine potential alternative actions which could minimize potential negative environmental effects. In our opinion, individual reviews of the five separate minor subdivision proposals would circumvent the comprehensive review requirements and intent of SEQRA. The implementing rules and regulations for SEQRA state clearly that "considering only a part or a segment of an action is contrary to the intent of SEQRA"[NYCRR: 617.3(k)(1)). In January of 1988 the applicants involved in these proposals were informed by our agency that owing to the interrelationships of the subject properties, it was requested that the developments be consolidated into one overall project and map (see attached SCDHS letter of 1/13/88). In addition, separate project reviews are also inconsistent with the stated objectives of SEQRA which call for agencies to avoid unnecessary duplication of reFLOA%TN71NGBTC4��W 92 COUNTY CENTER RiVERHEAD. N.Y. 11901-339] 14 Leiter to Valerie Scopaz � January 24, 1992 Page 2 requirements, and which recommend the combination or consolidation of proceedings in the interest of prompt review [NYCRR: 617.3(1)]. Combined review reduces duplication of efforts and provides the benefit of increased alternative design flexibility. Based on our review,we are most concerned with the subject proposal's individual and cumulative effects upon potable water supply,regulated tidal wetlands, coastal wildlife habitat (on and adjacent to the site),public access to water resources, and local visual aesthetics in this highly visible and scenic area. In addition,we submit the following comments for your consideration. I. Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) A.Article 6 Application Status: The SCDHS has received five separate applications for two and three-lot realty subdivisions of overall site. To date, our agency has issued approval for only one 2-lot land division on the overall property. This approval (Minor Map of Andrew Lettieri) issued in 1985, involved the southenunost portion of the overall site (SCTM#: 1000-31-5-1.2). All of the other applications are currently incomplete. Please be advised that SCDHS subdivision approvals automatically expire if the applicant has not filed a realty subdivision map with the Office of the Clerk of Suffolk County within six months of the date of approval of the Department (SCSC, Article VI,Sec.760-602). Absent evidence to the contrary, it does not appear that the minor subdivision of Andrew Lettieri was ever filed with the County Clerk. The unapproved minor subdivision applications which comprise the overall action have remained inactive since 1989 pending additional information from the applicant, and completion of the SEQRA process. In January of 1989 our agency notified one of the applicants (Joseph Cazza)that we would not accept a 1984,Town-issued Negative Declaration for a 2-lot portion of the overall site as acceptable SEQRA compliance sufficient to warrant action by our agency, on what was then a 4- lot subdivision proposal on the same site. B. Water Quality Concerns: Please be advised that test well data obtained in 1985 from the vicinity of the easterrunost subdivision(SCTM#: 1000-22-3-22) indicated high chloride concentrations. Potability of water on this portion of the site has not yet been determined. Additional well sampling data will be required prior to further action. The overall site development map recently coordinated with our agency indicates what appears to be a proposed community water supply system to serve the easternmost subdivision. Our records do not indicate any such proposal before our agency. The DEIS for the overall action should provide Letter to Valerie Scopaz January 24, 1992 Page 3 design details, flow calculations, and water quality data for this aspect of the project. In addition, the applicant should make a formal revision to the application before our agency which includes this proposal so a technical review can be undertaken. C. Sanitary Code Provides for Clustered Subdivisions: Article 6 of the SCSC provides for the clustered development of realty subdivisions, in which one or more relatively undersized parcels is designed in such a manner as to allow a substantial unimproved portion of the tract to stand open and uninhabited. D. Lot Size Requirements for Clustered Subdivisions with Private Wells: In the event that the subject proposal is served by private wells,please be advised that lot sizes may be reduced to 20,000 sq ft and conform to the water facilities requirements of Article 6 (providing the project conforms to the appropriate equivalent density, and meets all required setbacks, and separation distances for the installation of subsurface sewage disposal and water supply facilities). Lot size reductions can often provide valuable mitigation for potential natural resources impacts associated with large-lot development. E. SCDHS Compliance Requirements and Jurisdiction: The applicant must comply with the requirements of the SCSC and all relevant construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, test well data, and complete site pian details are essential to the complete review of this project. These considerations are reviewed fully during the SCDHS application review. SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems. The applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health Department approval. H. NATURAL RESOURCES A. General Comments: The overall project site is located in a sensitive and scenic area which has been recognized as a Town and County-designated Critical Environmental Area, and as a Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat (Orient Harbor Extension)by the New York State Department of State. Staff from the Office of Ecology have conducted a field 'inspection of the overall project site and believe that approximately two-thirds of the property is valuable as a tract of increasingly scarce coastal habitat. The importance of this site's natural resources value is underscored by its proximity to the adjacent Cove Beach property which contains a significant tract of mature oak woodland. We believe that the transition between the subject site's successional habitat and mature woodlands to the west increase the site's overall terrestrial habitat value by providing vertical and horizontal vegetative diversity and a related diversity of wildlife habitat. It is our understanding that the development design for the Letter to Valerie Scopaz A January 24, 1992 Page 4 Cove Beach parcel will provide for meaningful oak woodland protection in the vicinity of the subject parcel's northwestern perimeter. B. Proposed Development Design: The "grid" style lot configuration proposed by the applicant should be redesigned to minimize potential impacts to the site's numerous and sensitive natural resources which include regulated tidal wetlands, Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat resources,visual resources, and limited drinking water supply. In addition, the overall site development will require the expansion of an existing fawn road to traverse Town and State-regulated tidal wetlands. Roadway expansion onto the northern portion of the site will likely result in erosion, sedimentation, and possibly the direct elimination of regulated tidal wetlands. In the long term, this roadway will likely channel stonnwater runoff and its associated contaminants into the wetlands and surface waters of Dann Pond. As designed, the proposed residential lots do not appear to provide for limited clearing restrictions which would help prevent the proliferation of fertilizer-dependant turf and its associated potential impacts on ground and surface waters. We are also concerned that the lack of stringent clearing restrictions will heighten the visual impacts associated with the development of this parcel. Detailed roadway construction and drainage details should be required as part of the DEIS so that potential impacts to the site's natural resources can be responsibly evaluated. Also, a visual impact assessment should be conducted to examine the potential visual resource degradation associated with the proposed action. We are particularly concerned with long-term post- development impacts which could be seen from Main Road (NYS Rte. 25). C.Alternative Cluster Configuration: We encourage the Town to require consideration of the enclosed cluster plan as a development alternative in the DEIS. We believe this alternative offers significant natural resources protection and maintains lot sizes consistent with the surrounding area. This development alternative provides protection for more than 20 acres of undeveloped coastal habitat, eliminates the need for road construction across regulated tidal wetlands, and would preserve the scenic vista which can be.seen from Route 25. In addition, this project design would confine development to areas of the site which are least susceptible to coastal erosion hazards and flooding, and which also appear to have better water quality (based on prior sampling data). Leiter to Valerie Scopaz January 24, 1992 Page 5 Also,we believe that when the proposed open space is considered in combination with the protected lands of the adjacent Cove Beach property, the overall value of the subject dedication is significantly increased. The Town may wish to consider the possible public benefits of having proposed open space dedications transferred to the Town or a suitable land stewardship organization for long-term protection and limited public access opportunities (small boat launch, interpretive trails, shell and finfishing access, etc.). At a minimum, our agency strongly encourages that protected open space be retained in its natural state, and that no construction,excavation or filling be permitted in these areas. Open space covenants and restrictions should state clearly that such areas are intended for passive (non- motorized) recreational use and that they may not be subsequently converted to active recreational or coni munity use (ball fields, impervious parking, tennis courts etc.) in the future. D.Indigenous Vegetation: Indigenous vegetation should be used wherever possible in the landscaping of this project. Such vegetation is well suited to the on-site soils and can provide valuable mitigation in reclaiming disturbed portions of the site. E. Low Impact Recharge Areas and On-Site Soils Protection: In an effort to reduce potential impacts to indigenous vegetation,wildlife habitat, on-site topography and unconsolidated soils, we encourage consideration of recharge areas which require minimal excavation and structural modification. Also, we encourage careful monitoring of any project which requires the creation of large recharge basins, which we believe,have the potential to become unregulated "borrow pits" or"sand mines" during the development phase of a project. F. General Erosion Control Measures: Leaching pools installed along the project's proposed roadway are likely to fill rapidly with unconsolidated sediments during construction phases of the project providing limited long-term, stormwater control benefits. We request that the Town require a clean-out of these facilities during and after the majority of the site's development. Furthermore,we encourage the periodic maintenance of all such facilities on the project site. In order to minimize off-site erosion and siltation, we recommend the stabilization of all construction access points with a 50 foot long crushed stone bed (minimum depth of 6 inches), underlain with a commercial filter cloth. Leiter to Valerie Scopaz • �� January 24, 1992 Page 6 G. Cleariniz and Managed Turf Restrictions: We strongly support the imposition of clearing and managed turf restrictions on individual lots which can provide for greater protection of native vegetation,wildlife habitat, and reduce the potential for areas of fertilizer-dependant turf. III. SUMMARY: Based on the material reviewed, we believe that the proposed action will have negative environmental effects of significant magnitude and importance to require the preparation of a DEIS. Only a DEIS can provide for the level of necessary detail required to assess the above-mentioned issues. We believe meaningful discussion of alternative actions which minimize potential negative impacts is essential to this process, and we strongly encourage the Town to require detailed discussion of reasonable alternatives. Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. If you have any questions please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078. Sincerely, Robert S. DeLuca Sr. Environmental Analyst Office of Ecology Enclosures cc: Vito Minei, P.E. Louise Harrison Stephen Costa, P.E. Charles Hamilton,NYSDEC George Hammarth, NYSDEC Mohabir Persuad,NYSDOS Office of the Southold Town Trustees Frank Dowling, SC Planning COUY OF SUFFOLK ,o �t a � iy Patrick C. Halnin SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HAauls. M.D.. M.P.H. COmmiSSIONER January 13, 1988 Joseph Gazza P.O. Box 969 3 Ogden Lane lOgUe. N.Y. 11959 RE: SLIM# 1000-22-3-21,19,20,22 SC'IM# 1000-31-5-1 Dear Mr. Gazza: This Department is in receipt of five for separate applications Realty Develo7nent involving the above referenced properties. it is Due to the interrelationship Of the properties and applications requested that the Develcptnents be consolidated into one Overall project and map, for SBQRA review purposes This will facilitate the review and variance process. If you have any questions concerning this, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, Royal R. Reynolds, PE Sr. Public Health Enc1ineer RRR:ljr Bureau of Wastewater management cc: NYSDEC Southold Tbwn Planning Board Vito Minei dannarth, NYSDEC 'NTY CE, is SYO— ) ) V RNEAD r. . I I or 1 $pUTH6lS�?,i�?D 15 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 JAMES A. KUZLOSKI FRANKLIN E. WHITE REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER January 16, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Planning Board Southhold Planning Board Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southhold, New York 11971 Subdivision SECTMAL-1000-22-3-19 East Marion Dear Park-)-- , Dear Mr. Orlowski: �;1Ls 9i�Zp~ We have no project on NY25 in the area, in the next 5 years. We have no comments on the proposed subdivision. Very truly yours, JOHN A. FALOTIC06'U Planning & Program Management Director ; ,k SoUSNolo p�pNNING o AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALBANY, N.Y. 1 2231-0001 GAIL S.SHAFFER SECRETARY OF STATE January 13, 1991 Valerie Scopaz Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Scopaz: I refer to your correspondence, dated December 24, 1991, to this office regarding designation of lead agency status for the minor subdivisions of Bernice Lettieri, Joseph Frederick Gazza, Andrew Lettieri and Grundbesitzer Corp. and Andrew Lettieri. This department does not have any objection to the Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status. We would like to be placed on your mailing list to receive Environmental Impact Statements for those subdivisions when they are prepared so that we can determine their consistency with the State 's Coastal Management Program. Please contact me at (518) 474-6000 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mohabir Persaud Coastal Processes Technical Specialist MP/jtb 4 \° ,;.AN 17 SOUTHOLD TOWN pLANNING BOARD , AS ✓ - ra.e.ow STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 .LAMES A. KUZLOSKI FRANKLIN E. WHITE REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER January 8 , 1992 Mr . Bennett Orlowski Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr . Orlowski : Our Case No. 92-2 Proposed Minor Subdivision Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-22-3-19 Route 25 , East Marion Your December 24, 1991 Submission The subject material will be reviewed by Mr . J. Lentini of my staff . He can be contacted at (516) 360-6020 if you have any questions . For us to review this material , we will require three copies of detailed site plans incorporating the information enumerated on the attached sheets . Please send the revised plans to our Regional Permit Engineer, Mr. Vito Lena, at the above address . In your correspondence kindly refer to the subject case number . Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matterr:1 Very truly yours,AMES 0Regional Traffic Engineer JOF: JL:BT Attachment - Site AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER i Site Plan Requirements: A. Location and dimensions of existing highway pavement, curb, sidewalk, median, median openings, guide rail, utilities, traffic signs, traffic signal equipment, right-of-way lines and property lines. E. Existing and proposed buildings and appurtenances. C. Design features to be incorporated in proposed construction or reconstruction: 1. Width, pavement type and thickness of driveways. 2. Radii of driveway returns and other points of curvature. 3. Driveway grades or profile view of driveway, indicating low point on private property. 4. Angle of driveways relative to the roadway center line. S. Dimensions of roadside control islands and driveway medians. 6. Dimensions and elevations of curb and sidewalk relative to the edge of pavement. 7. Location of authorized traffic signs and proposed advertisement signs. 8. Existing and proposed pavement markings. Transition lengths must be determined on the basis of guidelines enumerated in the New York State Highway Design Manual. 9. Existing and proposed traffic signal equipment. D. Existing and proposed drainage features: 1. Size, type and grade of driveway culverts. 2. Highway drainage structures. 3. Direction of surplus water flow on applicant's property. E. Distance from each existing and proposed driveway on the site to: 1. The nearest side road in each direction if within 1000 feet. 2. The nearest driveway on adjacent properties. 3. Streets, roads, or driveways opposite the site. 4. Adjacent property lines. F. North directional arrow on each applicable sheet. G. ,Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plans and/or figures cited from Part 302 of the New York State Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. We will recommend any necessary lane closing restrictions. To allow for snow and ice control along the jobsite by State forces, the contractor shall schedule his work in accordance with the following: 1. No drums, cones, barricades and other traffic control equipment shall remain in a location where they will interfere with or be disturbed by a snow plowing operation. The work must be scheduled to afford the safe removal of such devices when necessary. 2. Drainage frames, grates and covers shall not be adjusted in a travel lane unless the final pavement course is placed prior to the onset of snow and ice weather. Steel plates, etc. shall not protrude above the adjacent pavement. If any of these protrusions exist in a non—travel lane prior to a snow and ice condition, then temporary asphalt ramps must be placed so that for every one inch of rise, there is a six foot run of ramp. H. Details of internal traffic circulation, parking, traffic control devices and any proposed additional pavement lanes or widening. For major projects involving such pavement work, the plan sheets must be standard 22 inch by 34 inch size and placed in the order specified on page 21-3 of the New York State Highway Design Manual. Oversize sheets with cluttered or illegible information are not acceptable in any case. If any traffic signal appurtenances are disturbed by pavement work, they must be shown on the plans and restored. All submissions must be prepared by a licensed professional engineer, architect or land surveyor. If we do not receive revised plans within six months, we will consider this project inactive and will require a brand new submission. I. For resubmissions, revisions must be highlighted in red or another characteristic color to facilitate our review. Each copy of the plans must contain the highlighted resubmissions. o � PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS x SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 24, 1991 Joseph Frederick Gazza, Esq. P.O. Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, New York 11959 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision located at East Marion on Dam Pond. SCTM # 1000-22-3-19 Joseph Frederick Gazza Dear Mr. Gazza: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at its meeting on Monday, December 23 , 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board continue the environmental process which was started on September 11 , 1985. At that time, this proposal was classified as an unlisted action. However, the classification is hereby changed to a Type I action due to the designation of Dam Pond as a Critical Environmental Area by the Town Board of Trustees on November 24, 1987. The Planning Board would like to take lead agency on the coordinated review of this Type I action. If you have any questions, please contact Valerie Scopaz. Sincerely, '���-� ��-✓.sem=,�-/�s Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encls. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn a SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman h ; Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ,Y Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 24, 1991 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request for: Proposed Minor Subdivision of Joseph Frederick Gazza Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 ( State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1 . Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2 . Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency,- and 3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal a completed long Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Joseph Frederick Gazza West side Dam Pond East Marion, N.Y. SCTM #1000-22-3-19 Requested Action: To subdivide a 4. 54 acre lot into two building lots. SEQRA Classification: (x) Type I ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: Valerie Scopaz ( 516) -765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (x ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. (x ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: The Planning Board is reviewing this project simultaneously with the following applications: Minor Subdivision of Bernice Lettieri SCTM # 1000-22-3-20 Minor Subdivision of Joseph Frederick Gazza SCTM # 1000-22-3-21 Minor Subdivision of Grundbesitzer Corp. & Andrew Lettieri SCTM # 1000-22-3-22 Minor Subdivision of Andrew Lettieri SCTM # 1000-31-5-1. 2 The Planning Board' s initial determination is that this proposal, when considered in conjunction with the others, will have a significant environmental impact. cc: Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk *Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Building Department *Suffolk County Planning Commission *Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services *N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation - Albany *N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation - Stony Brook (Attn: George Hammarth) *N.Y.S. Department of State (Attn: Mohabir Persaud) *N.Y.S. Department of Transportation * Maps are enclosed for your review JOSEPH FREDERICK GAZZA PPj ATTORNEY AT LAW P.O.BOX 969 3 OGDEN LANE QUOGUE, NEW YORK 11959 (51 6)653-5766(DAY AND EVENING) December 20 , 1991 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re : Proposed Minor Subdivision at Dam Pond East Marion 1000-022-03-019 , 020, 021 , 022 & 031-05-1 . 2 Dear Mr. Chairman Orlowski , The above property proposed subdivision has been improperly held in a comatose state by the Planning Board since 3/10/89 due to ill advise that these separate parcels were merged . I appreciate your honesty in admitting this situation in PP2 of your letter to me of 12/18/91 . Based upon this delay and the fact that the five subdivision applications were all filed in 1985 I respectfully request exemption from the -fA106-38 E. ( 3 )Section of Southold Code that providesfor a charge of $2 , 000 per lot subdivision fee . An environmental review of Lot 1 . 2 owned by Andrew Lettieri persuant to SEQR was completed by your Board as per resolution Dated 12/18/84 with a negative Declaration having been issued . Your statement that a coordinated review persuapt to SEAR was started by your Board on 9/11/85 would be consisltent with the timing of the subdivision application filing date of August 1985 , however the coordination statement appears to be at odds with the correspondence a part of the record to wit : 1 . DEC letter of 11/16/87 whereby DEC conducted an uncoordinated review. 2 . Town Planning letter of 9/22/88 states that NYS DEC is lead Agency at that time . 3 . DEC letter of 1/9/89 outlines that project is an unlisted action and that Town failed to timely respond to a DEC "Lead Agency Coordination Request" . DEC having completely reviewed the project under SEQR ( Including Archaeological ) and having determined "Negative Declaration" of this unlisted action. I trust under the circumstances of hese applications over the past six years that your Board will likewise determine the action to be "unlisted" and issue a negative declaration . Since this lead Agency was DEC and since your Board did not join in a coordinated review after DEC request and with knowledge that a type 1 action makes coordinated review mandatory there is no reasonable choice but to independently conclude this action to be unlisted and declare a negative declaration. Resp ful JOSEPH CK,,, AZZA SOUTHOLD TOWN PLNNING BODGM .,was PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �. SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman *- O " k„ Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. `>�✓ fir Richard G. Ward g �l ��f Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 18, 1991 Joseph Frederick Gazza, Esq. P.O. Box 969 3 Ogden Lane Quogue, New York 11959 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivisions located at East Marion on Dam Pond. SCTM # 1000-22-3-19 Joseph Frederick Gazza # 1000-22-3-20 Bernice Lettieri # 1000-22-3-21 Joseph Frederick Gazza # 1000-22-3-22 Grundbesitzer Corporation and Andrew Lettieri # 1000-31-5-2-.-1 Andrew Lettieri r.3. Dear Mr. Gazza; This is in reply to your letters of November 13th and November 25th in which you responded to questions that affected all of the above-noted applications. These questions had been set forth in a previous letter from this Board dated March 10, 1989. After careful review of these letters and the application files, it appears that the properties in question are not merged. Therefore, the Planning Board will proceed with its review of the applications of which there are five. A coordinated environmental review pursuant to SEAR was started on September 11, 1985 for four of the applications. However, a determination of significance was never made. It also appears that the environmental review of the southernmost lot owned by Andrew Lettieri was not started. In order for the Planning Board to comply with the State law and complete_ the environmental review, we will need a completed long environmental assessment form for each application. The short forms that were submitted in 1985 are no longer usable due to the designation by the Town Trustees on November 24, 1987 of Dam Pond as a Critical Environmental Area. According to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, all proposals in Critical Environmental Areas must be reviewed as Type I actions. A long environmental assessment form is enclosed. After receiving the completed assessment forms, the Planning Board will continue the coordinated review that was started in 1985 . The fee for our consultant's environmental review services will be sent under separate cover. Because of the length of time that has elapsed, we wish to send each of the coordinating agencies another copy of each subdivision map. It would be helpful if you could send the office eight copies of each of the five subdivision maps, plus eight of the general map that shows all of the applications. It also would be appreciated if you could complete the enclosed application form for the minor subdivision of the remainder of the Lettieri lot (SCTM # 1000-31-5-2. 1) into three lots so that our file is complete. Since you have authored all the recent correspondence on behalf of the separate applications noted above, it has been assumed that you are the designated agent for each application. However, written confirmation of this from each of the applicants would be appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact Valerie Scopaz. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. �S Chairman Encls. cc: Harvey A. Arnoff, Town Attorney Andrew and Bernice Lettieri New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11794 (516) 751-7900 lama a Thi mas C. Jorling January 9, 1989 u , i 3ilUi,16LD +C':d Town of Southold Planning Board i PLP^U 1"dG 8D ,4tD - ? Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Re: Dam Pond Subdivision DEC No. 10-87-1200 SCTM No. 1000-22-3-19 thru 22 1000-31-5-1 .2 Dear Mr. Orlowski: I am writing in response to your letter of September 22, 1988, and a subsequent telephone conversation between Valerie Scopaz of your office and Robert Greene, the Regional Permit Administrator, concerning the above referenced project. Please accept my apologies for the delay in responding to your letter and telephone inquiries regarding a shift in lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR) from DEC to Town of Southold Planning Board. A review of our file indicates that an application for a DEC Tidal Wetlands permit was received by this office on July 9, 1987. I determined that the proposed project was an unlisted action pursuant to the listing of activities in the SEQR regulations, 6NYCRR Part [617. 12, 131; but suspected that the project might be considered a Type 1 action by the Town. A letter was sent to Town Supervisor Murphy on or about August 5, 1987, along with a copy of the DEC application, environ- mental assessment form and preliminary subdivision map. This letter was our standard "Lead Agency Coordination Request" form and indicated that the Department had no objection to the appropriate Town body assuming lead agency responsibilities for the poroject. The letter requested a response within 30 days of the August 5, 1987 date of the coordination letter as per Part [617.6(c)( 1)]. As the 10 day period for establishing lead agency drew to a close with no response from the Town, I telephoned Diane Shultz of the Planning Board office, who seemed to think that the Planning Board would be interested in assuming lead agency for this project. However, no written response was received from the Planning Board until your September 22, 1988 letter. No further action was taken by the Department until November of 1987 when we decided to proceed with an uncoordinated SEQR review as per Part [617.6(d)] , which resulted in our preliminary determination that the project will probably not have a significant effect on the environment. We then proceeded with our review of the project for specific tidal wetland impacts. In late August of 1988, we learned that there is a possibility of significant cultural Bennett Orlowski, Jr. January 9, 1989 Page 2 resources being located on the project site and required a literature search and preliminary archaeological investigation pursuant to the State Historic Preservation Act. This work is on-going and will allow us to make our official determination of significance. With regard to your request for our consent to a change in lead agency from . DEC to Town Planning Board, we feel that our consent is unnecessary. We believe that no actual coordinated SEQR review was achieved because no written response was received to our August 5, 1987 lead agency coordination request within the statutory time frame. We initiated a coordination attempt, which was unsuccessful, so we proceeded with our own uncoordinated SEQR review which will likely result in a negative declaration. This uncoordinated review was started because we regarded this project as an unlisted action, and Part [617.6(d)( 1)(2)(3)] provides for uncoordinated review of unlisted actions and separate determinations of significance from each involved agency. This situation may change if the archaeological work and literature search show that the site contains a prehistoric site listed on the National Register of Historic Places or nominated for inclusion on the National Register. If this situation arises, then we would consider the project a Type I action from the new information. Coordinated review would then be mandatory. Please note that Part [617.6(d)(3) ] states: "For uncoordinated review of unlisted actions, each involved agency must make its own determination of significance. Each involved agency is considered a lead agency when making its determination of significance. At any time prior to an agency's final decision, that agency's negative declaration may be superseded by a positive declaration issued by any other involved agency." Since our agencies are involved in an uncoordinated review of this action, each agency must make its own, independent determination of signi- ficance. As mentioned above, the Department will probably prepare a negative declaration if tie archaeological work reveals no new information. Town of Southold Planning Board must reach its own determination of significance. A positive declarat- ion by the Planning Board will supersede a negative declaration issued by any other involved agency as well as prohibit involved agencies from reaching their final decisions until after a final environmental impact statement is filed and findings are prepared. We believe that the Planning Board does not need our consent tdact as lead agency, and is free to make its determination of significance as it sees fit. I hope this adequately explains the Department 's position on the matter. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this further, please call at (516) 751-7900. Very truly yours , r. GWH:jf George W. Hammarth cc: R. Greene Environmental Analyst J.F. Gazza, Esq. file c�c O(,Y,, P ANI G HQ'e�RD N TOAs SOU. LD I AM S L ' Y Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 September 19, 1985 Mr. Joseph F. Gazza Attorney at Law 37 Gardiners Lane Hampton Bays, NY 11946 Re: Subdivisions of Joseph Gazza, Bernice Lettieri, Andrew Lettieri, Joseph F. Gazza, and Lettieri and Grundbesitzer Dear Mr. Gazza: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, September 16, 1985. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board request that the 50 ' right-of-way throught the above mentioned subdivisions located at East Marion be constructed in compliance with the Town of Southold Highway Specifications and Standard Sheets, (revised and adopted July 30 , 1985) . Would you please submit construction plans to the Board, pursuant to the above resolution. The Highway Specifications may be purchased at the Southold Town Clerk' s Office. Upon receipt of the plans, we will schedule this on the next regular Planning Board agenda. Please don' t hesitate to contact our office, if you have any questions. Very truly yours, i,�nj��- BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. , CHA/L-N SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary RECEIVED BY JOSEPH FREDERICK GAZZA SONFRO lc'r'sV HLA'IIdING HART ATTORNEY AT LAW .. P.O.Box 969 3 OGOEN LANE 1F QUOGUE.NEW YORK 11959 (51 6)653-5766(DAY AND EVENING) So„r�iold Ta�,,.r P�✓NJc /�,�,,,�, 8-� 9 - 87 F-I /(1;i✓oR Svao1w -;Q. 6 S Le77-'tip: OAZZA Ar ,OAM TJ►� /VI DEC /�^ � REq✓ RRa /Ny S R vlFNar 'To 7i o A c We LA-o �.i vv �' y n M✓ o f 7 Ni✓ O✓ 'J"�^ f}ILk A /}T% P /rl7 O✓gr- Ail P(io `o rid .I'✓S d: v; r ;o... � , /o '7�r yow r.4 ./. ., A a F /I,.• 7 CD f'J(FL P TU 67 0✓rte i _T Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent, spoke to Joseph Gazza and Frank Cichanowicz regarding the roads within the minor subdivsiions for Gazza and Lettieri at East Marion. Mr. Jacobs advised that the access road will be required to be constructed as a major subdivision road to the specs and that it should be checked out with the Trustees since there is wetland area where the road would be. Filed: Joseph F. Gazza Joseph Gazza (Grundbesitzer ) - landowner in German) Bernice Lettieri Andrew Lettieri Lettieri and Grundbesitzer HVI)o eA to129WO1 _C&SS t44d,/Sl% � LsU 9x4C'r COCA-aOA/ (D1,qLl7V-5tO1V,5 ,5- oc �� ql tom, s x 40,GbO = IQ 01(90o Ig8,000 S�wK oN _NAP COUNTY OF SUFFOLK OCT 7 1985 o a a PETER F.COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS.M.D.,M.P.H. COMMISSIONER To: TA✓.✓ of .soul-dopa Date /�_ 4/_gs— ;�Z,q'vo s""14 ,8O.1R (7 Sour�f4i< Re: Dear 7,N#/000 -o.2a-03 We are in receipt of your letter dated Soso T /concerning the above referenced project. 23r1. This Department has no objection to your designation of lead agency status. 2. This Department is in agreement with your initial determination. 3. This Department does not agree with your initial determination. See Comments. 4. Insufficient information is available for technical comments. 5. There is no record of an application to this Department. A more accurate project location is needed. (Suffolk County Tax Map #) 6. This Department has received an application and it is: Complete AV Incomplete SEE C4/�l.�iE.✓i.S Other: 7. It appears that the project can be served by: Sewage Disposal System Sewer System and Treatment Works Subsurface Sewage Disposal System(s) Other: 548-3318 COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD.N.Y. 11901 7 Water Supply System A Public Water Supply System Individual Water Supply System(s) Other: AV 8. Comments: The Health Department's primary environmental concern pertaining to development is that the applicant comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code especially Article V and VI , and relevant construction standards for water supply and sanitary sewage disposal . These considerations are to be reviewed completely at the time of application. Full consideration in placement of water supply wells and disposal systems is given to state and town wetland requirements. The Health Department maintains jurisdiction over final location of disposal and well systems and the applicant should not undertake to construct any water supply or disposal system without Health Department approval . Other portions of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code also apply to commercial development such as Article XII. The Lead Agency is requested /� to forward a copy of this form to the applicant with its findings. �rEe �io�•s; %laY/Veaf-s 7—o co Aol/ ,� Ti s. c. A rT,c le 1/L i7 /c�4�al T. /a 7- r,, s . S'c:m/,S ;S 7-es'7 �/e /l resr+/ � it/YSDEC 1�Ei2r�i%, T,wn Tus%c c�..� SEys�2a Tei rH:.�<.7`..s �r.o�r 70 r7�? /e dre�✓ Further comment may be provided upon completion of the application review. Name f�L/E/z Phone5— • o��g�FFD(grc0 50U RECEIVED BY z THOLD TOWN LINING 89#b FRANK A. . KRUPSKI, JR., Vice President '1 _ W TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President A (516)765.1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III �FlTE JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. l HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 To: Planning Board From: Town Trustees Re: Joseph Gazza Date: June 9, 1988 Please be advised that the Town Trustees have inspected the site for the above referenced project and felt that there should be a 75 ' buffer outside of the stakes placed on the subject property. FAK r P D T LD S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 September 11, 1985 Environmental Analysis Unit DEC, Building 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 Gentlemen: Enclosed find a completed Short Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the subdivision of Joseph F. Gazza, located at East Marion, tax map no. 1000-22-3-19. This -project is unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until September 25,1985. We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and our agency will assume the status of lead agency. Very truly yours, n Z_�� (FY&UWA-L ) b� cLx y BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. cc: Department of Health Services . 14.1F.4;91e4) • J RO)ECT I.D.NUMBER NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS 4State Environmental Quality Review it SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM -JUL J ilos For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. Applicant/sponsor 2. Project Name 30-TEPFI FkEOEKrCAc OWLZA MAP FOR TO.i£PH r/tEDiCRIci- '9AZZ1I 3. Project location: Municipality TOWN of $ovr Ho LO County of SVPro L I.< 4. Is proposed action: ® New ❑ Expansion ❑ Modification/alteration 5. Describe project briefly: PRD POJ£P TWo Lor wI Not .2V 0V>I VLP ioN 6. Precise location(road intersections,prominent landmarks,etc,or provide map) N/o /V%4x Ar 2S oN R. o.IAt. 19OO •r 5/o S-7-A2f R0Af1 FA JT MAfLtun/ A/. Y. /DOO -0Z2_ -0'3 - 0 %<3 7. Amount of land affected: Initially µ •91 S acres Ultimately 'l'f • 9(S acres g. Will proposed action comply With existing zoning or other existing land use restrictions? ® Yes ❑ No if No,describe briefly 9. What is present land use in vicinity of project? ® Residential ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Agriculture ❑ Parkland/open space ❑ Other Describe: 10. Does action involve a permillapproval,or funding,now or ultimately,from any other governmental agency(Federal,state or local)? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, list agency(s)and permiliapprovals SOV7 NO Lo T.t/ rL ANMI 130Ara0 I ' Svf%ik C wv ry 06 Pr, of xE 4111_' " StRvsc J9 11. Dom any aspect of the actionhave a currently valid permit or approval? ElYes ® No If yes,list agency name and permit/approval type 12. As result of proposed action will existing permitlapproval require modification? ❑ Yes ® No 1 CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: J osaPh Facairglu< GAZ,'.ADate: T� 7' 1 6 86' Signature: If the action is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER PART 11 Environmental Assessmev+tTo be ompleted by Agency) C • A. Does action exceed any Type I threshold in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.121 If yes,coordinate the review Process and use the FUL4LONG FORM EAF. ❑ Yes ❑ No rceded 6V another B. will action receive coordinated review u Provided for unlisted Actions In 6 NYCRR,Part 617.71 If No,a negative declaration may be supe involved action. ❑ Yes ❑ No potential for erosion, C. Could action result m ANY adverse effects on,to,or arising from the following:Unsung may be handwritten,if legible) C7. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater ound in briefly;1ty or quantity,rwix levels,existing traffic patterns,wIM waste production or disposal, drainage or flooding problems, C2. Historic,archeological,visual or aesthetic,or other natural or cultural resources;agricultural districts;W community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. vegetation or fauna, movement of fish or wildlife species,significant habitat$,or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as oe of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly. fficially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of us C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly. C6. Secondary,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C7{6?Explain briefly. C7. A change In use of either quantity or Pipe of energy? Explain briefly. PART III Determination of Signitleanee (To be completed by Agency) g'. INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, lar important or otherwisecu significant. Each effect should be assessed in Connection with its(a)setting(i.e. urban or rural);(b) probability a occurring; (c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e)geographic scope; and(f)magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference Supp materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. dentified one or more❑ Ceck Chocked is box if to the FULI.ILONG FORM EAF and/or preparelly r aapoif have i sitor y eifdeclaration.a se impacts which MAY occur.Then ❑ Check this box if you have tetermined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, an on attachments as necessary, the reasons supportng this determination: Agency Preparer's Name Agency Name Date------------ �--�—"—" Preparers Signaturertitle LI /w TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD _ Z OWNER STREET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT 30 :5r-"w r1A FORMEk OWNER N E ACREAGE 4.915 S W TYPE OF BUILDING -RES. SEAS. VL. FARM comm. IND. CB. MISC. LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS _ V z0 0 70n / i "o C7/ /; /S vJ /3'&-ej 3 2G AGE BUILDING CONDITION NEW NORMAL BELOW I ABOVE Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value '. Tillable 1 Tillable 2 — • 1/S �?o D /�Z Wcodland -- - -- — Swampland Brushland - --- - -- - House Plot Tctal -ont 16 last • APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision platin accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be ...MAP FoR 7o s¢v H FACPAV Ao 9A Z ZA ...... ............ . ............................................... ................................................. 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber .g...90 ..... . Page 3 '.....PSQ.A.. ..... On ..SeP.'T.:. 14c r6 1977. Liber ....... .... ............. Page ............. .. ....... On Liber . ...... ............ ..... Page Liber . ....................... Page ......... .... .. ...... Liber . ....................... Page ............... . ...... On as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ... .......... .. ...... ...... ........ .... oras distributee ........................... ...... .. ..................................... . ................ ............................................ ............ ...................... . 5. The area of the land is ... .:4 .g ..... acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the (late hereof have been paid,Meept . ..,,,,.. . .. ...... ...... .... .... .......................... .. .. .... .. .. .. .... .. .. .... .................... 7. The land is encumbered by ........ NONE .. .................... . mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber ..... .. . ... .. . Page . .. .. . . . . .. .. .... . in original amount of $. .. .. .. .. .... . unpaid amount $ . .... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . held by . .... . . .. .... .... ..... . ..... ... address ......... ... .. .... . . .. .... .. . . .. ...... .. .. . . .... ....... . (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. . . .. .. P--"-e . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . ... in original amount of . .. .. .. .. .. ... unpaid amount $. .. .. . ... . . .. . . . . .. .. . held by ..... .. ............ ... ......... .... . address . .. ...... ....... . . . . . . . . . .. . . .... ...... .. .. .................... I (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. .... . ..... . Page . . . .... .... ..... in original amount of ... ....... .... unpaid amount $. .. ... ... . . .. ... . . . .. . held b ..................... . address ... .. ...... . . .. .... .. . . .. .... .. .. .. .... .................. 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ...t.S)`t. of 6vAY ..... .. ....... ..... . ......... .. .. ............................... 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts ..A9Srt. oE,vr.nL A.- 80 ...... . ...... ............ ..... ................... .................................. .. .. .............................. . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept . .. .SHORE,ei vE o F 0 ArA. .. Po�vD . ...... .. .. ............................... 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (dmmr) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . .... ..!VI` ................ .. .... ........................... 13. Water mains will be laid by .....NI„fJ .. .. .. .... .. .. .... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . .... ...L(Leo ..... .................... l.ines*n'es* ......................... ..... and (a) (41 charge will be made for installing said 15. Gas mains will be installed by ......Nltq. .... .... .. . . .......... ......................... . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B” hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. - 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as require by Sec. 335 of the Real rroperty Law. (Sc, dopy F -r.'44 Srn 069. . *r Acl 21. Submit a copy of proposed decd for lots sho%vinr all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". f .\ 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $. ...9.... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at ......0.... .. years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE .....5 !LY......lK�.t ....., 198 ......TR't I H Fe C0Coe r C4.-. .............................. .CAZz/1 (Name of A Lica t) By . .. .... .. . . . . (Signature and it e) 37 ,,��rdr a r Cwnnc ff.......+ RA Y f ..Y ... .... .... ........... ... . (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . ......Sv�1 K.... .... ...... „ ss: On the .......!V.t�.... day of. ........��1 y.............. 1985.., before the personally came So sE Pr1 FRED ... . .iR ...9?l Z . . . to me known to be the individual described in and who ............... .. ....... executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . ...lt+.E... . executed the same. 11411111 A.DUFFEY ��e , (�` !L/.. NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New YorM\ l No.01DU4715217,Suffolk Coup Notary Public - Term fxcit-a Yn',h 30 IY STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ..... ... . ................ .. . ss: On the . .. .. ... ....... . day . .... .... .. . of . ... . ........ .. 19. .. ..., before me personally came . .. . . .. .... ............... to"ire known, who being by me duly sworn did de- poseand say that ... ......... resides at No. . .... .. ...... .. . . .. .. .... . ..... .. .................. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ...... .. .. . .... . that . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . is the . .. .. ..... . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . of . . . .. ... . .. .... ... . . . .... .. . . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .... .. . . .. . ........ .... . .... . the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. ;uul that . . . .. . . .. . . . signed name thereto by like order. . . . . .. . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .................. Notary Public JOSEPH FREDERICK GAZZA JUL j 61985 37 GARDITMS LANE. HANPTOI? BAYS, NEW YORK 11946 July IG , 1985 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: MP for Joseph Frederick Gazza 1000-022-03-019 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads, improvement of common drive- way within Right of Way area only. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. You tuly, Josep Fredrr' Gazza see. awes,.ec@ saeye sew,awma lmomAma-aA.osamma onow a vm w woes rR S eerie loth.4a Of Npt*mbsr •erns hash at' t it gartimere UN. "notes bra. Saw toilft pop"r`y K XW do"p4, Frederick Getsa, residing at N MMIMM ._A- Una. Hampton Says, now York - gym V $9.35 FIS 17 d11 Dist. ,,y ,J1 1000 Net. C011Krr - 22 rA.t i sm mol raft Blocs wrnmomoTM'v as Wrh a dw Err"m -—d- of ten Collars ani otber 03 walistle conslierstlor.-- -- - - - - --- - - - ------- --- LL•'c,ys b.l.l..own d dr[..ward Vaww P" 21 ►. a. Wrtr ..1 a. w.w,d Wn. Auer M.A, Fraet .al r,L,- oni..a. Wn. ..1 dw .e.nrd pal, s'bAm w P.m, If d.'a.d Wet(nrrvrr. ALL ds mu,.. pke pr.e or Wnel .d land, GARY*mall�>•s mmAma�tflam�awmml. son" mod6r,e SS a at Gat Onr-1or., room, of Southoli. County of Suffolk to:e eT Now Yors, touniei ani iesorlbed a■ follow$: IBB: ; at the southwesterly corner of the hereinafter tesorlo*d p Asea wnitt ,olnt .a wnere :no ilvlslm. line Letwo*n the h*r*lmrt*r r1 strived ,rook s* and Leila now or foreerlf of Cove Beach Letat", 1406tteraect the northerly line of Latin now or formerly of Joseph Bokgs all point +iso being 11stant the following eight courses ati 11$tanees�` Fos the point where the Ilvtslon line b•..weet lands bow it formerly of a".a. codon ani Tanis now or forserly of Co.-* Beach Latnton, Is. ntersects the rortherly atie of Main Rom l: 1 North 12 deg. 39 sin. ri 8*08. #est a list, of 342.A Ft. to a point; South 75 let. 53 min. race. dart a dist. of 23.10 rt. to s potmto 7 yorth 13 dot. 54 ■l,�. 20 secs. lost a list. of 357.42 Ft. to a potato. ) Orth 12 ter. 20 min. 5- secs. nest a lint. of 598.7F Ft. to a point;„ Horth 14 lot. 55 air.. JC age*. dart a ;fat. of 111.96 Ft. to a petit;" 1 Yortr. 14 deg. 1: mit. 50 secs. deet a ;1st. of 71.14 Ft to a pulct;, . Borth1 lag. 17 kir.. 20 Seca. seat a list. of 144.10 Ft. to a polo%;,; South d doe. 17 min. 30 secs. fast a dist. of 312.yu Ft. to a pat rRUCL North 12 logro*s 32 minutes 30 •econla Nat alcog lends SM formerly of Core roger. Letate@, Inc. a dlatan,e of 608.91 Ft. to m rm&cz South 11 dog»n 23 minutes 2L @*coni.. goat along the 1 ntlornl Ionia a ilstance of 3,7.50 Ft, to lama now or formerly :N4cL Stith ul leoro*s 55 minutes 1� secoWn goat aloof the last ' htloneu Ionia a llstaneo of 724.3; FL. to lams nor er foywrly J. riiHCL Sort" i(, logrees 24 slnute$ 50 ieoobds Ne'- along the last Weill lanla a eistance of 4C3.e5 r. to tbo point or place of Wil �1SL•[1. II (♦ that eortvl:. ,,ot. pl*ze :r rare*! of Land sltost* lying snl tsimg +R.•Lu,st r .r to ., torr. of 30it9a11, Cc,nt,t of +iff_& ftr.l Umt* if Hwa Y inle: am feserltei or LTi..was; 'It Los =.o u:•a•:arlr oorner if the n• relnaft*r ].*rcrlcel slaws whle-. point tr •^ere t,•s iivivt_ itu o*two*b the lur*Suaft*r _ terlte: prealser r.i Lando now or formerly of Josegn Yoaet lotereact nigh water wars of pea ronl *all point also he mi! dlstaat the r llowing tee eoir$es ani ilstnne*s from the point wow tao div%a betne- leads now or forearly of Joseph ebbs sad Innoop : I of gens Smash totals*, toe. tntor*seto 'tis so Amid II i Orke, E9 Mt. )n On, W owe. owt a 110bn1M of 140.10 fl. te iotl a ttavt• " we *1•:. .r •..-.r. Nr: • f`•'tanef et 2`.Ic: ►t. tC f`�-. seat all �. *Wtr 11 6110. 1'e &la. A: "Co. mat • t,&%&& a of W.&I 1t. to • let+ berth 12 def. 2l a1n. yu seta. sect a dlatemae at 5A." R. to • L.at: ret! l* dot ct alr. 00 "Co. dont a Elotama of 111.95 /t. to 11 pe1•t: Kerte 14 See. 1: min. SC »c•. Wort a ilstanee of T1.14 R. to t IF . aro" iv lo.. :T a1 r.. x "es. Mast a distance or 164.10 R. to'. {n1 St: tlartr _r le.. L' al. . 3u **Co. seat a 1111,49.0* of }12.90 h. tom •S1 L; .0009. Mart a 11 r ta➢O1 of 4 ,v.cy R. to a ..� 11, 4 WAVII *estr l"' 1,l rse•-Ives •ester.* .w ➢1011, rotor Lara or 7►a F.1L1 a larti-ca •f ' - *t. euro or 1*es to t:. pout •here tme &tore sell llvtelzO :1-e L twi-ecte I" h1:': atter cart of Ju Pend not rrrzlar : _ VAk.Y a.rt1*-rat= a` :ter 3C esconds Nst a 11•tatee at o It, to .a•. - r I.:_-r. - '! :ov* tesoh Eluates Sr.e. Nam,-& bay:- re:reor :? air A&* X 1*ecnla East s 11•tarc* of 264, Vt. tC e . :rdCYA dca :*,roes 2` ,Irate• : #*a-Ma met a lluta:;c• of 5.00,,: 71,, k • wf IWILONA &outh *ryes• b a 1c nee sO aaconl■ seat s 11&Lanae of O1,. R. to • ,aL 'P.E:GY ,ic,t• !e.rte- ^ air: rtte 41, esc-nd• East • llrtsnco of 2". Ft. t: "Z. :1 s' a=:e r a'-�•pr reconis Evert a 11•t•*ea of 402. .. s. . - .`^Dal ecr.1 on a tls "gree 9D.1 seconir (art a il,taneo at A: _ r .t` a 9v^e prOLless 0Ona1j*i tC Vie 3rantor _ --:*t r� leen rf Froler!c• later an, "ndel a. Tatar. Ini!vjlaj ai; a a, ;I trfutets ant :.Salalatratora -.f the estate or May E. !%ter. J. - --'r. n. y �1 a: L. EY* P. 715 to"L%or sit-. rlr__ _.:a *r.l Interest of in and to rlpts of ver oho." or. ., .. .. + . 1ani lonote/ as trav*11e4 Road. ■oalvaT thrOveh rco_a - c rcN•. rho rlEhts of Woj new a4t fort- Sr. toe! - - -111 L. iUl P. al: to Ma rac.ar, In .:.lei d4*1 1 *e11i all the r]Ent title sod Interest of t;. .&r appirtonant to the parael.a See *&tato file .: ere! r. 1i4,) ooetalns speolf le U LMre in that see*&* t� tr.e '..o parcels *19 by ria!t of war." isn'is or a!;ofn:•f owners.' AM.te It aruvh that the Lrasil*n: of too Jrantor her* has "A rolls as a !Of a: Ha:s of accept w the &baro p�areal$ at ♦arta" ` Its*$ •taco . lav* L*re1 '.n* ,arcels %n9 hate never fwae Saltram" lflq so. font i 111 ac ac a sector of rlglt, opeal, ans cotorleaal9 as tie prior on•,ers cefcre at. ►arthar that the prier ermore to rltl fr.7 Tabor, frelev!ea C. Tecor ani denial IF, lar.or rare fart* s &sd •CL1101i ia.1 trs ato.0 t.: ,arc*ia as prolactive fare lane for the t rrovine or Lira teens arl at-or crops. i ! flrls etc fjaaN &alt lr. Lee rsRular course of wall*" of tag -:r.a•�:e 9reator with m *Ircja conseht of all aaarweollen, OWNS Mk 'ser i JUL 16 1985 ` TII T ' IVUI: NC f.r"P : ammot[ i t I . is g s X 4 + r natepriornemorIncumbrancesnot/G1-variti7vwriamner iL (e) Where the.insured shall have negotiated a loan to be made on (e)When liability has b,--n definitely fixed ir,accordance with the the security of a mortgage on the insured'sawe or interest in the conditions of thispolicy loss or damage shall be payable within been premises and the i tle shall have rejected1l proposed lender thirty days thereafter. Name of Insured Policy No. 1297710 GRUPIDBESITZER CORP. Amount of Insurance $ 8,500.00 Date of Issue 9/8/77 The estate or interest insured by this policy is fees iiimple ' ` vested in the insured by means of a deed made by Frecbick C. Tabor and Wendell B. Tabor, individaully and as co-administrator's of the Estate of May B. Tabor to the INSURED dated. 9/6/77, recorded 9/15/77. 3 + SCHEDULE B , gg .,.' The following estates, interests, defects, objections to�trtle he7is and"intumb`'rences send other mettef}rere excepted from the coverage of This polity: EFFECTIVE JUNE 2, 1977 els remos. Pargaraphs 3 and 6 are replaced by new Paragranh 3 as follows : 3. Any laws , regulations or ordinances (including, but not limited to zoning, building and environmental protection) as to use , occupancy, Sub- division or improvement of the premises adopted or imposed by any govern- mental body, or the effect of any noncompliance with or any violation thereof Paragraph 7 is now renumbered "6" A. No title i sure TBnd+ ligabelow the high water line o DaIIi�Pond as the same iYow exists or formerly exigte = & > ^ x B. Rights of the Peop e o i�tie"5t` to of New York in those portions of premises now or formerly under the waters of Dam Pond. C. Rights of the Federal Government to enter upon and take possession without compensation of lands now or formerly lying below the high water mark of Dam Pond. D. Riparian Rights of others than the insured in and to the waters of Dam Pond, as the same adjoins the premises described in Schedule "A", E. Premises under examination is an interior parcel which does not abut on a •street or highway. No easement of right of way for access to and from said premises to a public street or highway is insured. To be reconsidered upon receipt of a guaranteed survey. tk SCHEDULE "a" OF THIS POLICY CONSISTS OF SHEET(S). rD1i(T)4. '1.SF(,TI^l',T1k,�T(♦TTf �,/�T•+•� 3- odY( FtnAorIncurairHl114^Ia6tMir Wt rl aero P017; No. TM 7 R� "'— SCHEDULE B (continued) F. Survey by Van.,Tuyl dated 7/25/77„'shows, as to, both parcels,, vacant lands. Also shows, travelled ;farm roads crossing premises. No other variations. i G. Policy excepts ,possible easement rights of ,others, over ,so much of; the. premises which,lies. within the bounds ; of the travelled ,raodways. shown on '.the;_.survey, by Van.�Tuyl ,dated 7/25/77, . H. Federal: and New York. �state, taxes on. the Estate of,;May B Tabor, but.`policy,..insures- that.,same=will not ,be"collected out :of the herein described premises " .a W r,( , r ei 3 • -. s ' 'Rite .dn'Yi( � G��` i,” : .. d+rr Sti i Vj(1(yu *t I. Irl-.'_ ....l.m n.-,- n.Tr t �•rnvl. _.. _.... _ It a o. 1297710 . .--- ---- _----- ---- SCHEDULE A PARCEL I ALL that certain ,;piece.or parcel of land `situate, lying and 'plot; being at East Marion, , Town of 8outhold; , County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows : BEGINNING at the southwe9terly corner of ihe. herelhafter described premises which pointis, where the division line between the hereinafter described premises and lands now or formerly, of Cove. BeachxEstates, Inc. intersect the northerly;;line of landsnow,or 'formerly.,of Joseph,Boken said-point-also- being ,distant-thefol,�owing'eight courses and distances from the'point where„the' diviaion .` linebetween ,lands now or. formerly of Joseph-Boken'and' lands`nbw'or -formerly" of Cove Beach Estates, Inc . intersects the northerly side of Ma Road: 1) North 12 degrees 39 minute ds est a distance of 242-.90 feet to a point; 2) South 75- degrees 53 I&INest00` seconds -: eist a distance of 23.10 feet to a point; A � 3) North 13 degrees 5 to eOFseconds ,Fe ,a distance of 387.42 feet- to a point; _. u: _ .• �� 4 -North 12 ' de rees " g. seco�", West k,vdistance of 598.78 feet to' a point,;. .. t .. ,. 5) ` North 14`degree 5 s 00 secpn est, "distance of 111.96 feet to' a point; : lass' R .� t0 , . ... 6) North 14 degre5 Li 650 'secon estea`yfdistance of 71.14 feet to a point;' } I 11VO ! A 7) North 19 `degreee8 20 secoti eit stance of 144.10 feet 'to 'apoint;' 8) South 68 degrees ut 0 '8i Ela distance of 312.90 feet-to the`point`of be ng' THENCE North,l2`degrees 3 "sites 0l ec ` West"aiong lands now or-formerly-of ' Cove Beach Ls InC a distance. of 608.91 feet to 'a point y V - THENCE South'`77"degrees 23 minutes 20 seconds East along the last ` mentioned lands a distance of 367.50 feet to lands now or formerly J. Boken; THENCE South 09 degrees _55=minutes '10 seecsnds East along the ":Last mentioned lands a distancte of*724.36 feet .lands now or formerly ,,_ _ J."'Boken, : .: .. . < THENCE North 60 degrees 24 minutes 50 seconds West along the last mentioned lands a' distahce' of`403.85 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. For coaneyaneieaa '0 1y . Together With afl rig t, dill, and inrerelt W, in,ate to Any streets-and roadsabetting the shove dereribed.preaaitel. Our policies of title insuranatnclude such buildinwand improvements thereon whiehby'law consthuti,real property,'unless speciticallyexeepted.therein. Now is the time to determine whether we how examined all of the property and easements which you desireae be insured. If them are appurtenant ease- ments to be insured,please request suchinsurance. ''in some oases,our rate manuil.providea toren additional charge for such insurance. „ Wpt-MA _.# 77777 - , .. I rr p/q 1,2 tot, 44H ol GRAPE S.'too * , Iff to r EISI 401 � w. 090 43 31” TYRICAKL Wt Lt INVALLATIoN TYRIC44 rrpJ CA E sEPr�� Ti4NlC LEACNJnJG r00o4- _ �0 "' 1Me�l t NO qMd � Wim_ Nd. 1 o r i i 5' € �!a _ TYPICAL ;LOT GASB USjTf cd.Z 3Cp c: TANK PboL �a'Y5'TEM tr to � , rn `z !0 ' j0- fps"' = c . . r - b J I s M kC. r w TIN I 1 i O P MAt00 .ti` r o ' b g B s� ED Y tj 9 f KEC E IV TDWN PIAN ING BOMB , .5; v ,g M JUL 6X385- dAor;p I' DATE S MM .. . G� /' '�. -. lrWftFER.' ktY OE'� _ r N �+.1lA liv ,j r y— a ♦ Y Ava , ,, y . 7J4'IJ 1t'€'4',11' ' r B' I ftiiGT3oebp p. I IM. 10 U ! V 4 s N ' yy nk QSEJOIt Y f i VSA� (�4�I 1 r - - •' � _ - � r �f 1 ' 11 u Hii i, Fxzx'll I TNSdct ScV ,riL A - R I - - 411w�"�d�K ;'- gt�•.Alk�.'. � .ti:�•1 a, s r.� u'a�t a :., � �, 'j, - ,'.' '-`tel qF"��� a. r�. Fv _ �fi:a 6r irr a � Ft!"-'m•,�.., .L, LI, y,.. { k1, ,.. v E, 1�, ... .i t", a• -., .,. 3"t '., n � - Y �Ai n ., I n .l i .r. 1v t -: :. :. 1:14r r :un, Y1 ' • ,..n : = � �.' .( ., .: ,a :.,r.,, ..a . ,,, r ,.. .�'1 I _ L. a � f5 � tr �y • �a i In', I L it i " nfy vn..0 FrrFrc .q-. .rY, w. -.. .. � �'. . . .. : it i r'1 i- q..•� � N M1i IM. -.-,'�1., :,pl4( ` '.. .. " - -tiab"i �.:.;.", i5F'�` .:. '. ". .: ;, ",.� ' "b''�`—r 4"' :?w, � sr;i ?.,` . ia l •i� .-t ' .a- .'a>tx y' � . r., a �"� wu3 i � ,:� .. .M � r ,. .. ,n. ... 1.: �,ti '",. . ':.., „�'� } ',j 'v 5e It,1 y[� �,b, .,r wY ,A '. r -'d:�� J "1•� Y 't:. r 6At'� 61 I" '.:r a 4 " H° -1 r 5a .V Sc ' K •� ' Hutd 't ,l :$ .. . 'a .;g;V w ,�1� ,x. 5 .n by _ � t.�#r?rn a. . ,nafii tz' y 'R, ,tP��,. w ? ,<..�. . ., W& 'x ;u.S NkV, ,_d�. '�t?74P_ �� _ „gym.� - ... Nf�'. � .� , �'�.'.�..�, i 9 .�' wRk: t _ ':.�'$T� �. ' .' dufiarre. t vs�? �t4'��'�i.Ac�a`� _ 1 ec�w rW�. d WATE R ul.SUfaCE pump /¢ be place ')? CO�fR roff 'a ..Psf°°c ,re RAtj G2AnE � IrnlN (Min )pup TMA /0 'F It 20 70 42 G./dankla„aJ O .3. 911 a Lnod of wy aTOEL h = ' $EC7rON d• 7 � N.Y.f.CoeRO. arCrmu,d Water G ` I 4 0 N. 335766. -7 f 15 Bane � _ g'_ w..es lu fr HID IQ)5E Ez45B4a7�, h/, 89. 43' 3o'E 367.Sf 40'� / I u yyy Ware, bearing l/8 cr FF JOo[jeL $E PT1—CTA NI( 7 ? l0/000SOYC7 TYPICAL WELL IN5-TA LLA-V IaN TYPICA4 7YP/ Cid L e' SEP>/C T,pNk, LEfocNinlb POOL s -Iml�t /�\ Lep OHING TEs7HaLE i+ I\`ll�p'/1 •� N Pool \ y ✓ 7.5 V ILA 5 mx/ RE$UL. n Fie, 12.0 M - STREET TYPICAL LOT LAYavT tory SEPTIC TANK z & POOL SYSTEM h o \c t io J 1 �' S. 8/'�.i p•'F 312.65'..., w � N- �C eo � ARCA aW - _'�`�' . I -• •—,�� Q, P o Al n ki�Y MAP SCALE I° =6ao' '3 ea,a ° \ Ota/NER - DEV91-0 PER /t(A"y Sou"p I' JOSEPH FREpER=< 6A%ZA - ATTORNEY \,1 37 6A%0INERS LANE HAMpYOP4 DAYS,N.Y. 1194Co (96) 728-/886 MINOR SUBDIVISION 70SEPbl FREDERICK GAZZA 1 :I- L A/✓ DS 5/7-44.9 rE susoms1"or.) DATA h a Lc. r MARION /OG!//✓ olr Sou'R''OL-o TOTAL AR EA 4.915 AC 45 TOTAL N0. OF LOT$ Z wBUILDING 20143rA-eo h S(j--iC` I CO.� rt-� Y POSTAL Dt5TRrGT p^ FIRE DISTRICT 5CAL E: I"= loo ' JUL Y /9 85 Ste' 1-lighwny rKmit Rt . ZS THE U/hTER $J►pLA AND O/1rVM : M&.Q"� L1✓a4aAaf�A'R �e�. East Marton 14#w OF AI-L 0175 COMSAL FACILITIES y0''K of Al-L LOT$ COMPLY WITH TH6 scwLw Owwwx.v r OF ATHE RFIS SVFFdLKD COV TY R BOARD $ MA•/✓sr-!1!rr. �rPf OF HEALTH. w.v .m SOFFoL.K Co 7AX 14V A6_ FRANk BAYi 4rs owrc wRwovsOIV Owwwlx°xuNaw Ca,rrov s VIA /N'rrtPoL.lT/ow /000 - 022- 03 - 0/9 /o9Ll�trY AVE. RrJfg AraN Kw� - V. SLATE LfC. 29502, rnwOw wN"kiFFTI PfA 9A,,NO VOwxi IN U.S.A.,. D N �. WATC FL 4p, ' SLr face . Pump fn be p/eCE iq CPYIh ': SG.P.M. 'FfaSf pro•'FSirvcfiurE P/All /s'RAAF`q I/MW ((Min T • 2'MA" cQt �2' 9" �•, 10 F T�(y./,iW ilmn,/ V 3. Land of WM. .T0EL o 6fourtdeunfer M 3357!.6. 7 15 - wwos 4o'Ayn. £t4584dZ9�1 Al. 89" 43' 3o'E 367.5 C Jgfir fQar, g Sand gravel �f. -V - �SE PTIC TANK 9ooy,.G Z� �p/gpoSaFt „TYPICAL WELL JN5T<ILATION TYPICAL TYP/ CAL 5,X`i Tr9AIK LFACNlNG aov�- s' rMrrt , .LPece TE57' HOLE rOt o d, Ada: F o In N � h slev E .o _ h , as � j 8TRE5T till TYPICAL ' LOT LAY.''oo-r FGR SFP'i•IG T/11JK � � C �a r4r PCSDL: .$y5TEM ZO h ;p !d p . Ito lip i rif qd MA S �•:g, z __ 5 _ .• i � 6.35. � 41 ya�� L, D y fy MAR 13 0• ` SOUIH1 G TOWN ,PLANNING BOARD tf , rye• �F� . ._I' AV MAP - JD 'e•� eo \ -- ' scAce l"cboo' Ov.7NER - IjEV&40 PE(� ,GNG JQ5[PM 'REDERIG;C GA�2A • AlT4RNr4 �rCNup ,. 37 6>d1G1IN.64 S'- LANG . 7P94804 MINOR SUBDIVI310N can T05EPN FRE`DER/ck GAZZR \ , i * ° LAN D•$' Sf p'(,lgT �u6p�vr's€ts,a . DATA : NOTA I. NO Eo4aT551,stc _ - W "0/111 S AlV S D. e. C. EPQMAD�7Rii 'f� ' RItl-JoA/ LdC.4Y` is dloAIG r / Tf� �,r - \ 'G?M. aeN SHoRP LIME LOCA7'E.O ' 5GAL E:l - IOo r/VLF . o .JUNES✓uty /968 ,.�Ev LSArtsU'�a " Shea HI;6Nay Permit' THE WATER s,�Y•r�Y Awo DATVM Ml�d¢/-•�A /Ah[�+A�Cf�A�GI>� �` i $XBQ,.tr192, Rt . '25 ,p wgAE olsP aSAL FA [aIT1E5 a ♦ anK A" Anti 'Lo'Y'S GOMPI-Y WITH THE W I � ccw�� - eww.uwer - - { � ; f Esst Marion# New/.�© - . si��'tio. 2g5G ypp'L' esv,e.o " S(AN P;A RPJF 1LW Rl: q VIRE M6NT5 - E is r.,f •,� f[y �f�• R� q OF' 'rM�E � SVF Fd K [aVN7� BOARD . � f rtN[W M4 I-.!•,wI Lf - oF' 4iL°A4'1'H. . 1'r MRNv: 4„ -rAx w�-p - J - gwwlMO No•1YtR� t0 Ii�K ,G'M� pw a w.nnov�4 ar o ii �M✓ 4,11 �fl� l!1 'iF �A�'71 RAIi!,'� f ' rTc� ,J ^� - A000 - 0 - o ,613 p�:v. sdr i z -J' tit% �- - MA7pM.iM4. i - 1 '- r ' T OIIW .. " r 1 i Iii E e �-''s...:.�t.d3,.:°;=..a...�:._a..�: ,.t.,. ....._,_....,. . . , y, �� xJi. _ _-