The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-18.-6-14.5 Town Hall, 52[095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 119'71-0959 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-i800 LAND PRESERVATION COMMITTEE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 14, 2000 Daniel T. Latham Latham Farms 31800 Main Road Orient, NY 11957 Re: Your letter of January 20, 2000 concerning residential-use access over SCTM #1000-018-06-014.9 Dear Mr. Latham: Members of the Committee and Planning Department staff visited the site, in order to better understand the condition of the site and the purpose of your request. This matter was then discussed at length during the regular Committee meeting of February 7, 2000. I regret to advise you that the Committee has determined they are not able to honor your request for a residential use right-of-way over the above noted parcel in order to access the parcel identified as SCTM #1000-018-06-014.8. Such an approval-action would constitute an alienation of the existing town-owned Development Rights Easement terms and is therefore, not favored. Alternatively, the Committee' suggests you attempt to negotiate a right- of-way access over the easterly adjacent lands of John Tuthill, to achieve the same desired result. I trust you are aware of the requirement that you need to receive a sub- division approval from the Town Planning Board prior to closing your contract of sale to Whitmore Nursery. This requirement itself will need to address the matter of access to the 4-acre parcel you wish to retain in your ownership. I wish you success as you may decide to approach your neighbor to secure an acceptable (alternate) route of access to the parcel, Sincerely yours, RCR:jw ~ Ryan{~ Chairman cc- Land Pres. Members Melissa Spiro, Planning Dept. Brian Murphy, Deputy Supervisor/Liaison TttI$ PROPOSAL IS TO SBT Ol=f A ~ ACRE PAROSL FROM ~, ~7 S ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~i [~ ~ IN ... O~¢~ SCTM~ 1000- /~- f-~.s.,~t) ~7. a-7 I SET OFF C~r~?lete ap.plication~.ceived Application reviewed at work session Applicant advised of necessary revisio, s Revised submission received Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewell location Notification to applicant to include on final map Sent to County Planning Commission Receipt of County Report Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval Final Public Hearing Approval of set off -with conditions Endorsement of set off · 14-16-2' (2187}--7c 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an order['/ manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the enwronment or may be technicall~"expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader cc~ncerns affecting the question of significance. ' The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that thb determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a prolect or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Pa;t 1: Provides obiective data and information about a given project and its site. By idenl~ifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2,and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a proiect or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likelv to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. ,, DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and UnListed Actions Identify the Porlions of EAF completed for this project: I-1 Part I [] Part 2 [qPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of eacl~ impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ; [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore. ~s one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. I-] B. Although the project could have a signif'icant effect on the environment, there wilt not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures, described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED z~egative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a posilive declaration will he prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Typ~ar~e of ~.sible Officer m Lead Agency Title of Respunsible Officer q Signature of Responsible Oflicur \ / in I.~ad A,..,.nc) Signature o[ Prepart,r(If ddferent from res~nsibleolticel ~ / Date 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~'o a. What is depth tobedrock? lin feet) 2 ePART1--PROJECTINFORM.~ N ./~' /~ Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effec~ on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review Provide anyadditionai information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation If information requiring such,~dditional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Adc~ress, Municipality and County) NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR ADDRESS t3USINESS TELEPHONE ( ) CITY/PO STATE I ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER (If different) I EUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS ( ) CITY/PO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION I Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I~Urban E~lndustrial []Commercial [~]Residential (suburban) []Rural (non-farm) [Forest E]Agriculture E}Other 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or t3rushland {Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECl Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type)__ 3. What is predominant soil type{s) on proioct s~te? a. Soil draina~,:e: L~\Vetl drained __ % of ~-ite PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION _ acres --. acres acres __ acres ~3M<~derately well drained site ~l'oorly drained _ -- % ~f site b. If any agricul[ural I,md is revolve , how many acres of Land CJassi(ication Systenl~_ acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on prolect site~ ~Yes a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet} 2~ How much natural material earth, etc.) will be removnd fror s e~ ~) -- tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reda med~ f3yes ¢('No []N/A a. If yes, for what intend_~ purpose is the Site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E~Yes []No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [Yes E2No 4. How many acres of vegetation/trees, shrubs, ground COVers) will be removed from ste?__ ~) __acres. 5, Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? []Yes r~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~/ /~'- months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated I'~ /"~ (number). b. Anticipated date of COmmencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases?F-lYes[~]No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? r-lyes 9. Number of iobs generated: during construction ~/~ /.~ _; after proiect is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project /~ ~_. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~Yes [~LNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? 'E3Yes ,~No a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [Yes ~No Type ~ 14. Will surface area of an existing Water body increase or decrease by proposaN Explain · 15. Is project or any portion of proiect located in a 100 year flood p ain~ E~Yes ~Yes '~No E~No "~ 16. Will the project generate solid waste? []Yes ,j~rNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? E3Yes []No c. If yes, give name ~ -- ; location d. Will any wastes nol go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary andfill~ e. If Yes, explain Z]Yes ~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? E3Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site re,' --__ _years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pest c 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than orm hour per day)? ~Yes ~No 20. Will prolect produce op~'ratim,, noise eXCeeding tbn local ~,mbient m}ise t veJs~ ~Yes 21. Will pro~ect result in an mcr~dst, in ~,r?rgy If yes , indicate type, s) 22. If water ~:upply ,~ from ~:.~. ,..hca~,,lmm; ~' cap.,,itv ~ /~ g,dlons/mmute. · 23. Total anticipated wat~,r tJs~gt, per tidy ~ /+ galhms/day 24. Does project involve Local, State or ['f'(Jera[ I~ Yes, e~plain 4 2S. Approvals Required: City, Town, Vii/age Board [::]Yes City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes ~No City, Town Zoning Board [::]Yes ~No City, County Health Department [~Yes ~No Other Local Agencies []Yes [~o Other Regional Agencies [::]Yes ~No State Agencies [::]Yes Federal Agencies [:::]Yes [~,No C. Zoning and Planning Information Type 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~Yes [::]No · If Yes, indicate decision required: [::]zoning amendment ~lzoning variance I~special use permit []subdivision ~-Isite plan []new/revision of master p/an [:]resource management plan i~other ~...~Z-,_ O~ 2. What is the zoning classification(sJof the site? .~ /~C. ~ ~., ~ ~ ~. ~ 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Submittal Date 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? __/ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use pans? .~es ~No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~¼ mile radius of prog~osed action? 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ~ m e? ~Yes ~No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, bow many Jots are proposed? ~ / a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~ ~ C ~ ~ 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water di5tr cts? ~Yes ~o 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any Community provided services (recreation, educaton police, fire protection)? ~Yes ~No , a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes ~No 12. Will the proposed action resnlt in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be nee(led to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with yonr proposal please discuss such impacts and the measures ~hich you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above, ~s tnu' to th~' [mst of my knowledge Wilh lhls assessmenl. 5 Part OJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR KGNITUDE Responsil~ili/y of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an ~mpact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3 · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each Inca ty, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrat'ive and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2} to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column2 If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentiatlv large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the pro~ect to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box ih column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be expJaihed in Part 3. iMPACT ON LAND 1, Will the proposed action result in a physical change to h~ prole.c~.site? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~O ~Ii~'ES · Any construction on slopes of 1.5% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~ntinue for more than I year or involw! more than one phase or stage. tons of natural material (i.e., took or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary l.lndfill theslte?( e clift's dunes geom,, a forma ()is etc.)~NO L2YES · Specific land forms: I 2 Can 3 Small to Potential Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes [~] ~ ~Yes , ~ ~ ~Yes [~No IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conser~ion Law, ECL) .~¢,.N O E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland · Other impacts: ._ 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ,~O E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groun(~water quality or quantity? ~¢.b!O E~YES [xampies that would appiy to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed {proiect) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ~ liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or olher discharge into an existing body of water to the exteul, that It]ere will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas wilhoul water and/or sewer serwces · Proposed Action locates COmm~,rcial and/or industrial usos which may facilities. · Other impac s: water runoff? ,~O ~Y[ g Examples that would apply to column 2 7 Small to Moderat~ Impact 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] 3 Can impact Be Mitigated By Project Change ~Yes ~ ~Yes c ~Yes ~Yes [] Yes '~r~ Yes '~Yes [~No ~Yes []No lyes '-IN ~Yes ~Yes ~Yes ~Yes [~Yes ~]Yes ~Yes eYes ~Yes ~No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ~lO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action wd[ induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Fmission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the d~ensity of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or enda species? ~)d [:lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ,/~NO [~]YE S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wddli[e species. · Proposed Action requires lhe removal of more dian 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally ul~portant vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect a~ricubural I,md resources,' ~'",' O [~Y[/S Examnles tilat ;',ould apply to {:olumn 2 · The proposed ach,:)n would sever, cross or limit access to aRH(uJtur,d land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vmeya d, orchard, etc.) 8 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact Jcan Im3pact Be Mitigated By Project Chang~ [=]Yes ~j~No [~]Yes ~-~Yes ~o ~Yes L~o I-'Yes ~Yes ?Yes ~Yes ~Yes ~,Yes J~]Yes J~]Yes ~o ~]Yes o [~]Yes r'es ~No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? _~NO ~YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or proiect components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land u'se patterns, whether man-made or natural · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which wiiJ eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views hnown to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IN1PACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ,[~'NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the tq¥S Site Inv~mtory. · Other impacts:_ IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION C [xamples that ~l:ld nl)iI)y to i:oJumrl 2 ~x~NO /]YES Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 I Can Impact Be Mitigated By IProject Change ~Yes ~]Yes I--lYes L.~No []-]Yes No ~Yes o E]Yes E]Yes ~]Yes ~Yes [=]Yes IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existin~ transportation systems? ,,~NO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of peopl'e and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: __ IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ~qO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a §rearer than $% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the Creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two famil~ residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPAC"[S 16. Will there be obiectionable odors, noise, or vibratio~nN~)S a result of the Proposed Action~ - ' [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital school or other sensitive facility. ' · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour Der day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safetY~O Examples that would apply to column 2 [~YE5 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i e oil pesticces, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous ~vastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, hi~;bJy reactive rndioac ye, irr~tatinl;, infectious, etc.) ° Storage facilities for on(' rnilJion or more gaJJ<)ns of li(iLUfied natural gas or o~her flammable liqmds. within 2,000 feet o~ a sit(! use(f i<)~ the (fisposal of sohd or hazardou~ · Odlnr imp;tots: 10 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change [~]Yes ~NNO ~Yes No [] Yes o ~Yes [~Yes ~ Yes [~Yes [~Yes [] Yes [~Yes [~]No [~]Yes E~]No ~Yes ~ ~Yes ~V~s ~Y~'s IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the ex,stag community? C Examples that would apply to column 2 ~NO [~YES · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public potential adverse envl}onmenta impacts? I ~ 2 3 Small to ' Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact ,Project Change [] [] []Yes ~'No [] [] []Yes [] [] []Yes No [] ~ []Yes [] [] []Yes ; '~o [] [] []Yes [] ~ ~Yes ~ No ~ ~ ~Yes E ~YES C If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe [if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonabfe to conclude that this m~pact is important. To answer the qtJestion of im[}ortance, consider: · The probability o¢ the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibihty, including permanently lost r('~ourc~,s of v,lJ(It~ · Whether the impact carl or will be corHroJJed ' The regional consequence of the -npact · Its potenti.d diw~r~wnce [rom local net.ds and goals ' Whether known objections to the pro;~'ct relate tn this impact (Contmne on attachments) 11 617.21 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review V suaI EAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 1 l of Part 2 of the Full EAr. (To be comp!eted by Lead Agency) Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenc qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? ~ State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ' National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? ~, National Park Service lands? · Rivers designated as National or ,State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System. or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site. area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Local road? Distance Between Project and Resource (in Miles) 0- V4 V4- V2 '/2 -3 3-5 5 + 2. Is the visibility of the project ~;easomd? (i.e., :;creened by summer foliage, but visible du~infl other ~ Yes ,,[~,r'~ o 3. Are any of th~ reson~*,~s ch*m-ked u, cltl(~,llon used by the public during the t~rne of during which the p~olcct will be v s ~Ves ~No DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question I check those ~vhich generally describe the surrounding environment. ' Essentially undeveloped F'orested Agricultural Suburban residential industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond ~ '~7 Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed .5. Are there visually similar projects within: *1/~ mile ~Yes ~]No ' 1 miles [~Yes redes []Yes Within '1/4 mile * I mile *3 miles []Yes []No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is ~ ~ NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. -- ' CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Activity Holidays/ Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [ [] [ ~J Involved in recreational activities ~ [ [] Routine travel by residents [] At a residence '~ ~ [] ~ At worksite ~ ~ ~ ~ Other ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Tbwn of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and sta'tes as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision stobe ~ f+ ';-- t '~ far l*'? ~..l¥i.~l,'t~. .......... .......... 4, .... 3. The entire laud under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) The land is beld by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as folloxvs: . % Liber . [.O..rT./'/.~. ... Page ......... ............. On .../ ........ ; Liber . ....................... Page ................. On Liber ....................... Page Liber ........................ Page ...................... On Liber ........................ Page . ..................... On as devised under the Last \¥ili and Testament of or as distributee ........... 5. The area of the land is ........... ~..... acres. 6. Al1 taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except ............ 7. The land is encumbered by ' mortgage (s) as follows: · ' ' " ' - ....... inori~ina anount (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ......... Page in original amonnt '$OUlHO[~ IOWN 11. 12. (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amount of .............. unpaid amount $ ...................... held by ...................... ...................... address 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ................. I0. No part of the land lles under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherxvise, ex- ce t ... The applicant shall at his dxpense install all required public improvements. 13. 14. 20. 21. The land (does) ~(d_oes not) Ii_e in a \Vatcr District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is \Vater mains will be laid by ...{..~ /~ and (a) (no) cbarge wil be lnade for !nstalling said mains. Electric lines and standards ,,'ill be installed by ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by in~a.d.e f~o~.ili~t ..... ~ .... :'. - and (a) (no) charge will ~ ................................. · allin.., said mains· 16. If streets sbownon the plat are claimed hy the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffblk Cotmty ilighway system, ammx Schcdnlc "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on ~hc plat are claimed by the apl)licant to be existing puhlic streets iu the Town of South(fid Illghway system, annex Schcdnle"C"bereto to show same. 18. There arc no existing' buildings or structnrcs on thc land which :trc llOt located and shown on the plat. 19. \Vhcre the plat Mmws in. Ol,mcd str~'cts which are extensions ~ff streets on adjoh~in~ sub- d/vision maps heretof{~re filed, there are no reserve strips at thc end of thc streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the prol)oSed streets. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer pr,.d ,ff title as required by Sec. 335 of thc R~al I)r~erty Law. - Submit a copy ,ff l>rOl)OSed deed for lots showing all rcstricti,ms, covenants, crc: .'\nn~x Schednle "D". ' 22. The applicant estimates that tbe cost of grading and required public improvements will be $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at .............. years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Scbedule "F". DATE ........ (Name of Applicant) (Signature and Title) (Address) STATE OF NE\V YORK, COUNTY OF ................................. ss: On the ........ .......... day of ............................. , 19 ....... before me personally came ............................................ to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ............ executed the same. Notary Public STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF .................. ~.: ...... ss: Ou the ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ...... , before me personally came ....................... to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ......... '... resides at No. ................................ that .......................... is the .......... the corporation described in aud which executed tile foregoing instrument; that ......... '... knows tilt. :,cai o£ said c,~rporatitm; that thc seal affixed by order tff tile board o£ directors o£ said corporation. :,:,l ~hat ............ signed .............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Re: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk'County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in ~ the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, S UF~FO L K:--COU' .N, Ty Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARI~ Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence. 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your owner abutting this parcel? ~ 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, Count, etc.) Yes 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard to a different project~ on this parcel? Yes 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? Yes 7. Does this property have a valid certificate of occupancy, if yes please submit a copy of same Yes I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied on by the Planning Board in considering this application. Signature of prop~erty owner or authorized agent / date Attachment to questionnaire for~.the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: On the .~day of ~.~ , 19~, before me personally came ~~ _~ ~,~ to me known to be the individual described in-and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ~ execute~the same. / Not~T~ ~ublic -- ~ ~en E~lree Oemmbe. ~ le~/ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 965-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: MEMORANDUM All applicants to the Planning Board Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Correspondence to Planning Board Office August 15, 1988 The Planning Board office processes a large volume of correspondence every day. You can help us process this mail (and ultimately your application!) in a more efficient manner by doing the following:~ 1. Submitin9 cover letters with all materials. The cover letter should state: A) the name of the project ahd b) the Suffolk County Tax Map number of the property. c) the reason for the submission of the material. d) a telephone number where you ~s~lbe reached during normal office hours. 2. Submitting only complete applications Keeping track of items submitted under separate cover takes up a disproportionate amount of staff time and space. Keep in mind that complete applications are given immediate attention. Incomplete applications are likely to be returned. Thank you for your cooperation. jd IPROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) t. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality County SEQR 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Exbansion [] Mod~f[catlonlalteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7, AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRiCTiONS? [] Yes [] NO If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] rndustrial [] Commercial [] Agriculture [] Park/Forest/Open space [] Other Describe: 10, DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM.~NY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? . [] Yes [] NO If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTIO{'~ HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] NO If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes [] NO ~ CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AppJIcant/sponsor name: Date: If the action is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART U--ENVIRONMENTAL ASS~MENT (To be completed by Agency) · A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 6 7.127 [] Yes [] No If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEVV AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 N'YCRR, PART 617.67 may be superseded by another Involved agency. - ~]Yes E]No If No, a negative declaratl C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species~ Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources' C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, Cumuletive, or other effects not identified in CI-CE? Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE. OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSy RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] NO If Yes, explain briefly PART UI~DETERMINATION OF SIGN F CANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For e~ch adverse effe~i identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (Le. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or Significant adverse impacts which MAY occuc Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the'reasons supporting this determination: Nam~of Lea~ ~parer (It different trom~srble officer) OaL&- ~ 2 ~ Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#~ 1000- Date: Comments: Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-18~2 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOAHDOFTOWNTRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD TO: BENNET ORLOWSKI, JR, CHAIRMAN FROM: BOARD OF TRUSTEES DATE: March 30, 1999 RE: DRIVEWAY The Board of Southold Town Trustees received a survey from the Planning Board on January 8, 1999 regarding the proposed driveway of Daniel Latham of Latham Farms Inc. The Board went out on our regular field inspections on January 13, 199 and inspected the site and found no problem with the proposed driveway being constructed near the irrigation ditch on that property. If you have any questions, please call our office at 765-1892 APR 0 1 1999 $outhold Town Planning Board Southold Town Planning Board m.~,. t (~) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK " ' ql --JReal ProD.try Tax Service Agency / ¢ ',, \ JUDrrt~ T. TERRY TOWN t~EGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS ~GE O~'~'ICER RECORDS MA.~AGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF IN'FORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southol~l, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CI.ERK TOWl~ OF SOUTHOLD January 27, 1997 Edward Latham Latham Farms Orient, New York 11957 Dear Mr. Latham: The Southold Town Board, at their January 21, 1997 meeting, reviewed your request to the Planning Board for a refund of your $250.00 application fee for a minor subdivision. A review of the time expended by the Planning Board and Planning staff to arrive at the final stages of your proposal translates into a financial expense for the Town. Therefore, inasmuch as the application was processed and pursued from September 199~, through July 1995, at which time the only matter remaining was action on the final map, the Town Board feels a refund would be inappropriate. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk cc: Planning Board~'~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICI-IARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LAT1KAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS K~NNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765~3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Judtih T. Terry, Town Clerk FROM: Melissa Spiro, Planner~ RE: Proposed Set-off for Latham Farms SCTM# 1000-18-6-14.5 - 14,9 and 1000-27-2-7 DATE: January 14, 1996 Attached please find a request the Planning Board received from Edward Latham for reimbursement of the application fee for the above mentioned proposal. Edward Latham submitted a $250.00 application fee for the set-off on September 30, 1994 (Minor Subdivision #858). In addition to staff meeting numerous times with Mr. Latham, the proposal was reviewed by the Planning Board, the Town Trustees and the Suffolk County Planning Commission. A coordinated environmental review was conducted and sketch approval was granted by the Planning Board. The last action on the proposal was in July 1995, at which time the Planning Board was awaiting the submission of final maps with Health Department approval and the preparation of a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions prior to taking action on the final map. Due to the fact that the proposal was at the final stages and as mentioned above, much time was spent on reviewing the proposal, the Planning Board does not recommend that the application fee be reimbursed. Please let me know if you require any additional information. enc. cc: Edward Latham PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Halt, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 3, 1995 Edward W. Latham c/o Dan Latham 31800 Main Road Orient, New York 11957 RE: Set-off for Latham Farms SCTM~f 1000-18-6-1q.5. 14.6. 14.8. 14.9 S 27-2-7 Dear Mr. Latham: I have discussed the Notice of Incomplete Application you received from the Health Department with both the Planning Board members and Roy Reynolds of the Health Department. As you know, the Planning Board required that you designate the areas of the subject property where the development rights have been sold and where development rights have been retained. However, since your property has multiple tax map numbers, the Health Department is viewing the proposal as a six lot subdivision. In order to proceed with the set-off as proposed, you must obtain Health Department approval. Therefore, to satisfy the Health Department. the map must be amended to remove the above mentioned designation, and to show the entire property as one parcel. Please contact me to discuss the above before having the map amended. Please note that I will be on vacation the week of July 10th. Sincerely, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orfowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 February7, 1995 Edward W. Latham c/o Dan Latham 51800 Main Road Orient, NY 11957 Re: Set off: for Latham Farms SCTM# 1000-18-6-14.5, 14.6, 14.8, 14.9 & 27-2-7 Dear Mr. Latham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 6, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the January 5, 1995 Sur;'olk County Planning Commission report. Condition Number I of the Planning Board's conditional sketch approval contained the following terms: I. The 2.975 acre area shown on the set off: map shall not be considered a building lot. This area Is located within the R-200 Zoning District. Thus the buildable area (2.975 acres) does not meet the minimum lot area requirements of the R-200 District. Although the 2.975 acre area is shown as a separate tax parcel, It is part of Lot #I. The development rights have been sold on parts of: Lot #I. The development rights were not sold on the 2.975 acre part of Lot #I. Condition Number 1 of the conditional sketch approval and the ~:ollowing paragraph, must be presented in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in proper legal form. Page 2 Set off for Latham Farms February 7, 1995 These Covenants and Restrictions can be modified only at the request ot: the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of South- old after a public hearing. AdJoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. A copy of the draft Covenants and Restrictions must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Town Attorney. Once approved, the document must be filed in the office of the County Clerk and a notation must be placed on the final map stating the Liber and Page number of the filed Declaration. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard C;. Ward Chairman eric. cc: Suffolk Count7 Planning Commission Frank Cichanowicz DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ~UNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFf NEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE STEPHEN M. JONES, A.I.C.P. January 5, 1995. Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Street Southold, NY 11971 Re: Map of Latham Farms Southerly side of Main Road, N.Y.S. Rte. 25, 861.10 + feet easterly from Platt Road, Orient in the Town of South~Id. Dear Mr. Ward: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 4, 1995, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Map of Latham Farms" referred to it pursuant to Section A 14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Stephen M. Jones Director of Planning Robert Ri~kert, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Section RR:mb File: S-SD-94-13 Attachment File No. S~SD-94-13 Resolution No. ZSR-95-03 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuant to Sections A 14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEP~EAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on N( vember 23, 1994, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Map of Latham Farms" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting premises located on the southerly side of Main Road, N.Y.S. Rte. 25, 86 I. 10 + feet easterly from Platt Road, Orient, in the Town of Southold, and - WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on January 4, 1995, and WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to approve with certain changes said referral, Be It Theretbre RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is approved subject to the fbllowing condition: The owner should not be permitted to create an additional building lot along Narrow River Road. This substandard parcel should be merged with the 76.578 acre parcel to the north. Motion by: Commissioner Van Schoor Seconded by: Commissioner Haley Commission Vote: 12 Present - Yeas 12 Nays 0 Abstentions 0 Dated January 4, 1995 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765~1938 1994 Harrison Demerest, Jr., Secretary Orient Fire Oistriet P.O. Box 41 Orient, NY 11957 Dear Mr. Demerest: Enclosed please find two (2) surveys for Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by ~>. Io cooperation. . 1994. Thank you for your Sincerely, Riehard g. Ward Chairman DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY BUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE MARY E. MIBB£RD, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER Janua,-y 6, 1995 Melissa Spiro Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Latham Farms, Inc. SCTM#: 0900-18-6-14.5, 14.6, 14.8, 14.9 & 27-2-7 SOUTHOLD TO~AN [ Dear Ms Spiro: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS; "Department") has received your letter dated November 21, 1994, concerning the above-referenced project. The Department has no objection to your designation as lead agency. Based on a review of the subject coordination, the Department offers the following comments. However, the Department wishes to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s) established for this action. These comments should not be construed as an implicit SCDHS approval or rejection of the project. All applications are reviewed thoroughly with respect to Suffolk County Sanitary Code concerns by appropriate departmental personnel when SCDHS applications are completed. Article VI Application Status; Future development of the 5.0 acre parcel will require submittal of an application to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services as required by Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC). SCDHS Compliance Requirements and Jurisdiction: The applicant must comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code and relevant construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are essential to the review of this project. These considerations are reviewed completely at the time of SCDHS Letter to Melissa Spiro January 6, 1995 Page 2 application. SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems. The applicant, therefore, should not undertake the construction of either system without Health Department approval. Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078. Sincerely, Kimberly Shaw Sr. Environmental Analyst Office of Ecology KS/amf cc: Vito Minei, P.E. Stephen Costa, P.E. Frank Dowling, SC Planning DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING OCOUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE STEPHEN M. JONES, A.I.C.P. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING January 5, 1995 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Street Southold, NY 11971 Re: Map of Latham Farms Southerly side of Main Road, N.Y.S. Rte. 25, 861.10 + feet easterly from Platt Road, Orient in the Town of Southold. Dear Mr. Ward: · Th.e Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on January 4, 1995, r~ewewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Man of Latham Farms" __c~_A~, .~ . · . t' . . . tcxcl/cu LO 1[ pursuant to ~ect~on A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Adm]mstrat~ve Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Stephen M. Jones Director of Planning Robert Riekert, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Section RR:mb File: S-SD-94-13 Attachment 220 RABRO {:)RIVE S SOUTHOLD TOWi PLANNING BOARD File No. S-SD-94-13 Resolution No. ZSR-95-03 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on November 23, 1994, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Map of Latham Farms" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting premises located on the southerly side of Main Road, N.Y.S. Rte. 25, 861.10 + feet easterly from Platt Road, Orient, in the Town of Southold, and - said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on January 4, 1995, and the Commission has voted to approve with certain changes said referral, Be It Therefore RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staffas the report of the Commission, Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is approved subject to the following condition: The owner should not be permitted to create an additional building lot along Narrow River Road. This substandard parcel should be merged with the 76.578 acre parcel to the north. ., Motion by: Commissioner Van Schoor Seconded by: Commissioner Haley Commission Vote: 12 Present - Yeas 12 Nays 0 Abstentions 0 Dated January 4, 1995 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Ortowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYo~ 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FORM FOR THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF: ~ISSUANCE OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION ISSUANCE OF POSITIVE DECLARATION COMPLETION OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT COMPLETION OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Type of Notice: [--'~Unlisted ~Type 1 Project Title: SCTM#: Location (Street, Hamlet): Lead Agency: Address: Project Description: 1000- I~-G -(j~..~-_ I'f-'/)a, nd, 27-2-7 ~6t~fh ~id~o ~' k~O~;/~ f. cl. amd qorfh s~d~ of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Rd., Southold, NY 11971 ~3h s'78 ~crc Data of Acceptance of DEIS/FEIS: Contact Person: PIt.,lis~a 'sp/ro Address: Planning Board Office 53095 Main Rd., Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (516) 765-1938 Fax: (516) 765-3136 For Draft Environmental Impact Statement indicata: Final Date for Comment Period: For Public Hearing indicate: Date and Time: Location: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Janua~ 10,1995 Edward Latham Main Road Orient, NY 11957 Re: Set off for Latham Farms SCTM# 1000-18-6-(14.4-14.9) and 27-2-7 Dear Mr. Latham: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 9, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman eNC. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-I 938 January 9, 1995 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed set off for Latham Farms SCTM#: Location: 1000-18-6-(14.5-14.9) and 27-2-7 South side of Main Road and north side of Narrow River Road, Orient. SEQR Status: Type I Unlisted ( X ) located within 500 feet of CEA ( ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: Set off of 5 acre parcel from an existing 81.578 acre parcel. Page 2 SEQRANegative Declaration- Latham Farms Janua~ 9,1995 Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The parcel to be set off is located within the R-200 zoning district and meets all the requirements of this district. There has not been any correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time. Therefore it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 CC; Langdon Marsh, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Judith Terry, Town Clerk Applicant ENB PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Nov zz-j 1994 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Suffolk County Planning Commission H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veteran's Memodal Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of L,~.~:'V,.~W,' ~,~,% ~_,,,c. S.C.D.P.W. Topo NO.: Hamlet/Locality Zoning S.C. Tax Map No.: Major Sub.... Minor Sub./",, Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: ~ Plat (3 copies) Topographical Map (1) Lot Line Change_. Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet Road Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1). Site Plan (1) Grading Plan (1)~ Page 2 Southold Town Planning Board Referral Referral Criteria: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an ( ) Unlisted Action (%) Type I Action ( ) Type II Action 2. A ( ) Negative Declaration ( ) Positive Declaration ( ) Determination of Non-significance has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. ( ) Yes (x) No Comments: We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral ( ) Yes ( )No Referral received 1994 by the Suffolk County Planning Commission and assigned File No. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Frank Cichanowicz rev. 6/94 DATE: lll~ll~ SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: CO~IENTS SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: CO~ENTS: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER print PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards November 15, 1994 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Edward Latham Main Rd. Orient, NY 11957 Re: Set off for Latham Farms SCTM# 1000-18-6-(14.5 - 14.9) and 27-2-7 Dear Mr. Latham: The following resolutions were adopted by the $outhold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 14, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this Type '1 action. The action has bc'c.3 classified as a Type '! action since It Is located within 500 feet of a Critical Environmental Area. BE IT RESOLVED that the SOuthold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated August 15, 1994 with the following conditions: I. The 2.975 acre area shown on the set off map shall not be considered a building lot. This area is located within the R-200 Zoning District. Thus the buildable area {2.975 acres} does not meet the minimum lot area requirements of the R-200 District. 2. The final maps must contain all requirements necessary to file the map In the office of the Counb/Clerk {key map, lot numbers, etc.) Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six (6) months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is Page 2 Proposecl set off for Latham Farms November 15, 1994 requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. Final maps (six paper copies and two mylars) all containing a valid stamp of Health Department approval, must be submitted before a final hearing will be set. Please note that the Planning Board has referred this subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. You will be notified if any Covenants and Restrictions are required. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairmant PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~lcha~d G. Ward, Chairman Oeorge ~tchle Lathara, Jr. ~ennett Orlowskl, Jr, Mark S. McDonald Kermeth 1~ Edwards Telephone (516) 765 - 1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P- O, Box 1179 Southok~, New York 11971 F~x (516) 765 - 1823 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this ~equest is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of COncern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a Copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: L~T ~%~.9.~ F~¢~, ~c Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: (~) Type I L~ ( ) Unlisted Co~tact Person: (516) -765-193~ The lead agency will determine the need for an envirorn~ntal impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (~) This agency wishes to assume lead a~ency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to you~ agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below). Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Board of Appoal~ Southold Town Board ~Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services ~NYSDEC - Stony Brook ~NYSDEC - Albany ~A~f T~a n Sp~r t~_io n * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies Albert J. Kmpski, Presidem John Holzapfel, Vice President William G. Albertson Martin H. Gan'ell Peter Wenczel BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hai~/~ 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Melissa Spiro, Plsnning Board John Holzapfel, Vice-President, Board of Trustee~/ Monday, October 24, 1994 Latham Farms Upon inspecting this parcel and reviewing the file I found that although there were phragmites around the edge of the parcel we feel that it is not an active wetland area. DATE: SENDER: SUBJECT: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER ~ ?~yl L~Lf~a~ SCTM#: CO~ENTS: Z PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southo~, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TO: FROM: Albert Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees Melissa Sp/ro Planner RE: Proposed Set-off Latham Farms SCTM# 1000-18-6-(14.5-14.9J and 1000 - 2 7 - 2 - 7 DATE: October 4, 1994 The Planning Board is reviewing the above mentioned proposal to set off a 5 acre lot from the existing 81.56 acre parcel. The Board has asked that you review the entire site to determine if there are any wetlands located on the parcel. Please contact me if you require any additional information. enc. ~ SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT. THIS INSTRUM~T SHOULD ~IS IND~ made the /~ /o say ot g~ua~ ninete ' BE~EEN , en nunarea and eighty ~o~ Harrison M. ~est, Jr., Ro~rt T. ~rest, ~d ~uis M. ~est, doing business as H. M. ~est ~in Road, Orient, N.Y. party of the first part, and La~-lara Farms, Inc., a dcraestic coz~poration having its office and place of business at (no #) ~ Road, Orient, N, .Y. $... dollars, lawful money of the United States, and other good and va'~uable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby ~rant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, D~ece, or ~arcel of land, si re, 1 and being at Orient, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the Southerly line of Main Road at the North- westerly corner of the ~remises of Norkelum said ~oint also distant 916.82 feet Easterly as measured along the Southerly side of ~ain Road, from the oorner for~ed by the intersection of the Easterly-side of ~latt Road with .the Southerly Side of Main Road; RUNNINC~ THENCE along said land, of. Norkelum five Courses as follows: 1) ,~o~th 35o 04' 30" East, lal.22 feet; 2) THENCE on a tie line parallel to and 16 feet Northerly from the North- erly side of a barn, North 66o 54' 30" East ~9.73 feet; 3) THENCE Parallel to and 16 feet Easterly from the Easterly side of said barn, South 23o 05' 30" East, 65.20 feet; 4) THENCE North 55o 43' 00" East 94.92 feet; 5) THENCE North 25o 23' S0" West 18.3 feet to land of ~tller; THENCE along said' land of ~iller, of Appelte; THENCE along said land the following (3) 1) South 35o 50' 10" East 128.22 feet; 2) North 54o 47' 30" East 247.35 feet; 3) North 35" 12' 58" 09' 30" ~ast 118 feet Courses and distanoes: 30' West 2R3 feet to the Southerly side of ~ain Road: THENCE along the Southerly sid. e of ~lain Road, North 63o 19' Ne~v York; 30" East 473,72 feet to the Westeriv ~de ~f' land now or formerly ~f .~tate Of THENCE along said land, the following (2) courses and distances : l) South 42o 07' 00" East 1108.38 feet; 2) North 47" 53' East 30 feet to the ~outhwesterlv Side of formerly of John Tuthill; THENCE,along said land the following (4) land now or Courses and distances: to land ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lyingand being~ at Oriept, T~,~ of Southold~ County of Suffolk and State of Now York, bounded and described as follows: PARCEL I BEGINNING AT A PIPE. set on the southerly line of Main Road at the northwesterly corner of tJ~e premises of Blauvel.t and ruffling thence along said land of Blauvelt, five courses as follows: (1) South 35°04'30" East, 181.22 feet to a piPe; THENCE, (2) on a line parallel to and 16 feet northerly frcm the northerly side of a barn, North 66o54'30'' East 89.73~feet; 'TH~CE, (3) Parallel to and 16 feet easterly frcm the easterly side of said barn, South 23o05'30'' East, 65.2 feet to a piPe ; THENCE, (4) along a private hedge, North 55o43,00'' East, 94.92 feet to a piPe; THENCE, (5) North 25o23,00'` West 18.3 feet to a piPe and land of ~[iller; THENCE along said land of Miller, North 58o09,30'' East 118 feet to a pipe and land of Appelt; THENCE along said land of Appelt and land of George L. Edwards Estate, South 35°50'10'' West 1006.97 feet to a granite monument; THENCE still along said land of George L. Edwards Estate, South 35030'40" East 2135.43 feet to a marble monument at the northerly line of Narrow River Road; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE OF Narrow River Road South 21o48,40'' West 245.90 feet to land of Fettinger and Trench; THENCE along said last mentioned land North 66° 02' 30" West, 231.58 feet to an eight inch post; THENCE still along said land of Fettinger and Trench North 41o02'30,,. West, 1461.53 feet to a pipe in a concrete monu~ent and land of R. Tabor; THENCE along said land of Tabor North 32046'50" West, 594 feet to a granite n~nu~nent and land of Scandia Products, Inc.; THENCE along said land of Scandia Products, Inc., North 37o10,50'' West, 1042.10 feet to land of M~yer; THENCE ALONG said land of Mayer, North 52°49,10'' East, 117.23 feet; THENCE along said land of Meyer and land of Freeman, North 35o04'30'' East, 250 feet to said southerly line of Main Road; THENCE along said southerly line of MaIN Road,,North 66° 18' 30" East, 55.72 feet to an iron pipe and the point or place of B~GINNING. BEING AND INr~)ED TO BE the same prem~ises conveyed to the party of the first part 5y deed dated 2/16/72 recorded 4/6/72 in Liber 7136 cp 421 made by H. M. Demarest and Sons, a co-partnership. PARCEL II BEGINNING AT the northwesterly corner thereof at a point South 37° 08' 30" East 328.22 feet frcm the southerly line of the Main Road, which point of beginning is the southwesterly corner of lands conveyed to Phyllis E. Hale, now of Appelt, running thence North 53°29,10'' East 247.35 feet to a point on the westerl[;~.line of lands of Louis Young, now of H.M. D~narest; THENCE ALONG LAST mentioned land South 36030,50'' East 864.32 feet to a mon~nent; THENCE South 36o34'00'' East 2075.93 feet to the northerly line of the highway known as Narrow River Road; continued... 1~ South 42" 07' East 43 feet; 2) South 32" 39' 10" East 494.56 feet; 3) South 38" 23' 40" West 320.4~ feet; 4) South 36e 09' 30" East 1191.86 feet to the Northwesterly side of Narrow River Road; THENCE along the Northwester].¥ side of Narrow River Road the following courses and distances: 1) South 36e 54' 40" West 598.39 feet; 2) South 21" 48' 40" West 245.90 feet, to the Northeasterly side of land now or formerly of Plainland Realty Corp; (2) THENCE along said land the following (2) courses and distances: 1) North 66" 02' 30" West 231.58 feet; 2) North 41° 02' 30" West 1461.53 feet to the Northeasterly side of land now or formerly of John ~4. Strong; THENCE along said land North 32" 46' 50" West 594 feet to the Northeasterl% side of gcandra Products, et al~ THENCE along said lands North 37" 10' 50" West 1042.10 feet to the South- easterly side of lands now or formerly of Meyer: THENCE along said land North 52" 49' 10" East 117.23 feet; THENCE still along land of ~{eyer and land now or formerly of Gluckmiman, North 35" 04' 30" ~est 250 feet to the Southerly side of Main Road, and THENCE along the S~utherlv side of Main Road North 66" 18' 30" East 55.7R feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. TOGETHER~wfth-a~~ight-of way ].5 feet in width over the westerly portion of ].ands formerly of Phyllis E. ]{ale now of Appelt and a rig],t of way 10 feet width over the Easterly portion of said lands formerly of Phyllis E. Hale now of Appelt lying to the north of and adjacent to the premises hereinabo described. ~q TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof, TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises, TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been incumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNF_.~$ WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: Harrison M. D~narest, Jr. co-ptr. Ro~.~rt T., _.D~a~, esot co-partner ~uts ~. ~res~, ~r~er STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OII ' SS: STATE OF NEW Y COUNTY OF pOenr da re me On the of day personally came Robert' T. D~marest and Louis M. D~narest to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrnment,/and acknowledged that they executed the same. // SAMUEL J. OUC~UMAN // NOTARY PUBUC, Statw'd New Y~ ~,/ No. E2.4871422, GuM. In 8uffeKt & ~. Y STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 , before me personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he is the ; of , the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal aflLxed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. SSI 19 , before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 , before me personally came the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he knows ; to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw execute the same; and that he, said witness, at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. argain ale Bee WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS 'rITLE NO. Dcn~rest, et al TO LathamFarms, Inc. ST~BARI [ri ~ MEW YBRK BOARB Of TlR[ ONEEWfEIT~ Distributed by CIEICAGO 'ri lqlalB llM~URANCE C OH PANy SECTION BLOCK LOT COUNTY OR 'rOWN Suffolk Recorded at Request o! CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Return by Mail to MarciaZ. Hefter Esseks, Hefter, Cuddy & Angel 108 E. Main St. P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 Zip No. ~UTHOLD TOWN September 20, 1994 I hereby give permission for my father, Edward W. Latham, to sign for me on the application before the Southo]d Planning Board for a set-off under the name, Latham Farms, Edward and Dan]e] Latham. Daniel T. Latham SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD DATE: SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: COMMENTS: SUBMIssIoN WITHOUT COVER LETTER - L~-~F - ~ DATE: SENDER: SUBJECT: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER ~oct ~/o,~ Toy l ~ d L cc't ham SCTZ#: /8- (~_C/', 13, I%, l¥. I COMMENTS ~ 1 9 1994 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD DATE: SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER O0~ENTS: / SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER ~-% -;-59% -, \ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~..c+ $OUTHOLD Real Property Tax Service Agency ,,L~GEm __ 027 tq 34'- ,-.u/,hi// 3q:n OF I '9' W. iZ5 ~6~K5 , ~0'~'~-- / ' ', ,4,,'a %.~ '. s..~o~.~.. ~ . ' ~ lll~'~ ~ , .... _ ~ , Ig~'l'.b~ lpg - .~ ~. ~i. ~ g ''~ d a ,'~ ': ~"~' ~ ~~.~,,0 ~ ~/~ "' . ' ..... jWd ~C~N: lO0'=l" ~ .... '~'~' , .... ~e~ /ac' ' '~ .,~ ~J~' ~ ~.09- ~'Z~~'10 ~ f,,,,,~duu~:: zu.~.~/k d~u~e; ~aa' P,~c~'/s: ~. ~t.~7~ ~C~Eo ~'~ ~O0~IC~ I ~ ,,