Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-18.-6-5 ~ - - .:. ,- I I -9 \ . 1 'II f~~ ~t I. i;l -t f ~ ~- ~ ~ of) -:r ~ . ~ <t1l1.~ ~~" -5 .~ 11'~ ,~ --J ~ ~~~ \l ~'t "~~~'lr ~ ~ ~ '"Z. <:l -k <.]<\o~ .1\ sin ~ j"fi ~ .: & \n' ~ t '" ~ 4-~ .. '........... ~.fIItJW4;-......- 't', \ ". ,I" /~ ~\ - ~. ( \ - ~..~ --r- . ( Zoning Board of Appeals (written c~mments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees I SIre PLAN Presub mission conference (within 30 dJYs of written request) Complete JpplicJtion received (within <I months of presub, conference) ApplicJtion reviewed at work session (within 10 dJYs of receipt) AppJicJnt advised of necessary revisions (within 30 days of review) Revised submission received LeJd Agency Coordination SEQRA determination REFERRED TO: Building Department (certification) . Suffolk County Department of Planning Department of Transportation -State Department of Transportation - County Suffolk County Dept, of Health Fire Commissioners RECEIVED: Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape plan Lighting plan Curb Cut approval Health approval Drainahe plan Reviewed by Engineer ApproVJI of site plan -with conditions Endorsement of site'plJn . .. , .. _.~. ....... Certificate of Occupancy inspection One year review fIWTlr::::l I~~ ~~ fIWTlfQKl ~~ fIWTlfQKl I~nu~ 3131 In 5.!-r2.1"/1 Unli'.)t~d ac:.hO>-. 1/- 3-'7 fw pc.c. lee I G.a rmn:Jr;;;;-, ~~ EJ I~ll~ IC&RI rmn:J bl ~~ !~,lIEJ rmn:Jr;;;;-, ~~ Sent: Received" rmn:Jr;;;;-, ~~ rmn:Jr;;;;-, ~~ rmn:Jr;;;;-, ~~ l~.L'~ r:<oour;;;;, ~~ ~J~ I'W11fOi(l ~~ / RVTlrn;;, ~~ I".nl r:::-t W P~G BOARD MEMB~ RICHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ,{1y7~~ .;rN.~ t'"" j, ~ v/~ "'- 0'~ ~'" If::;, ~j "Q . ;,,' '~<I> ;;;e~ :-\ "'" !'>7 ~ <::>,. ~;y ~Q.{ + ~~y ~y . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPUCATlON FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PlAN $- New _Change of Use _Re-use Extension _Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: Location: Address: Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: Agent or Person responsible for application: Address: Teiephone: Site plans prepared by: License No.: Address: Telephone: '3 f} iii tv! -/J TJ -evz I- L. if ~."l <::> N1 a';' 12 &-<.. d' t1J 1"'1"-:' I- ^h "'75) , , 1.3,..// /JI/a..-.f, ~ N'YI'IE;< /I//&JJ,h. . ~o 1!-t!'YY;c./cs K&<tcf. M,;'(,t>I4',~";' //50/ 0-/6) 737 -'-Ie,. 20 J'1"u'k. l\<- NlkV'1 B~ <:>"5 Pj"II~.r i?diAlt'1 ;:Q j"sc.iJ PE - SIlt/;/c ~!V/v(I<'!<I1'/ . "2110 .5_,Y(~ '~\' R~k~I:I)~/N'1 //77'1 (s/&) ~{,. 7- '/775 (.1)4,;,--, F, c.oll-~s /illI 0/50'1+ /Z-J'l._ lec-~/!n'!r.Pr7~ s..kuL'0Ntr/1733 (:;/0 & ~7 - ~i:)O (Tit&nt~5 i<. 74" j" tJ rr::---;-"-;;-:'--',~-:,'-., r;'\ 1 "u' oj ",1: ..!l.'....cL.L1LJ'~, I ~ If I' "Vi 'I LI: NOV 7 1996 It.:!) L .JJ sou fHOLD TOWN PLANNiNG BOARD 11--04-;.996 QlJ.=090t>1 F~OM Spl)IK & "1URRAY Tn 4778583 0.02 . . ~2 l'I;nnlng Saara Site ?Ian AcClrcaUOn APPUCANl'S AFR)AVIT STAn: OF NEW 'lURK COUNTY OF SUFroUC "Hay MIl.RK.f ",,."'''RE''''' ~ILLI P5 being <1IJly sworn. deposQS ana says tnatJ:le rQSl~ at 2/5 l/4) SiREc::r, GRUWPORT Ny /lQl./4 "17I~y fl~E. in tne State Of New YOrl<. ana tnat ba-lS tne owner Of me above prOperty. or tnat he IS tile Oftne 1SQ8C:fy WfllImlOr ?IrtnonI1lo or Core.l mael whicn IS hereov making apPllc:atlon; ht tnere are no exlstlng stnJctlJJ'QS or improvements on the lano whicn are ",or Shown on tile Site Plan; tnat me title to tne entire parcel. InClUdtng all rights-of-way. has been Clear1y estal:lllSheo ana is Shown on said Plan; mat no part Of tne Plan in1'r1nges upon any Ouly !ilea plan Whid1 has not lleen abanponeo botil as to lOts ana as to roads; ht 118 has examined all rulQS ana regUlatlons aoopreo by tne Planning Boara fOr tne filing Of Site Plans ana Will compty with same; ht tile Plans sulJmitted. as approvea. will not be altered or ctIanglld in any manner without tne approval Of tne Planning Boara; ana tnat tne actual Pl'lVSlca1 improvements will be installeo in strict a=roance WIth the plans submJtteo. ~ Sworn to me tnis ~~' ,..., ~YlIfl No. 4'7Il28OO 0uIIIItd n &I1lllIk~ .........""",.k>~ Elrp/IW..... 31. 1t!1. 7 19~ TOTRL P.02 . . . . Pall'e 3 Planning Board Site Plan ApplicatIon 1f53oSF Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) ;? - ~o Zoning District Existing Use of Site 1/4 Co ~ f- _ ProposedUs.eofSit!! 't.".d;s5.[.t:e'f:~'f/::!:C:;;:: 7/'~ "'fM/,J hi <I. 0<<-6/,<.- u?,/,~ ' I-..",I.~ 'j: "h"; _~___~ . /) Gross Floor Area of Exis ng Structure s) 'I <josFGross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(sJ Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where appllcabie) Has applicant been granted a vanance and/or special exception by Q~".h.nt$ Board of Appeals . Case # & date / IJ Board of Trustees. Case # & date 11/ / A NY State Department of Environmental Conservation . Case # & date Tll'11I Suffoik County Department Health Services. Case # & date , Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other ,yo Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffoik County Board of Heaith, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of issuing agency Number and date of permit NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTlONJ MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNJNC BOARD. VIOLA TORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION ,,::~:,. ~~ ~~-~:.- -"~'---- - -:....... :=? 517.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1....1&-0& (21371- Text 12 1 PROJEcr 1.0. NUMBER . I , SEaR 1. APPLICANT iSPONSOR for Bell Atlantt2' PROJECT NAME Thni 01 ",,,1 ,,~~~ p '" M~hilo "'''MM_n,-i oni- J. PROJECT LOCATION: MuniciDality nrioni- County <'..""_11. '. PREC:Se LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent lanDmarks, etc., or provide map) r ..,.- "'.0 ~.- 1;''''''''\ I" .. r; U \VI [, 24850 Main Road, Orient ::pi :~~ i.i,,) lY u " "'~..'_O ,_.~ 600' east of Platt Road , i. SCTM# 1000-018-06-005 (' NOV 7 1996 ;,1;" , 5. IS PROPoseo ACTION: i '.. .C"";,'; ";", -........ , I Bow [J EXDansion o Modification/alteration ,.'l,iU,;~dLO TOhr'i rLN~~ll~'JG BOARD 6. OESCRIBE PROJECT SRIEFL Y: Construct and operate a wireless (cellular) telephone facility by a public utility (BANM) . A 1,800 square foot area enclosed by a fence containing a 100' high monopole tower and a 12' x 40' unmanned -, modular equipment shelter. 7. AMOUNT OF LANa AFFECTED: Inillal/v < 1 acres Ultimately ( 1 acres a. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LANa use RESTRICTIONS? eg Yos DNo If No, describe Metly 9. WHAT is PRESENT LANa USE IN VIC:NITY OF PROJECT? o Residential o Industrial o Commercial e9 Agriculture o Park/Forest/Ooen space DOl.... DesCribe: Vacant Land TO. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVEF1NMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL. STATE OR LOCALl? ~Yes DNo It yes, fist agency(sl and permiUagprOvals Federal Communications Commission -'--. 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAve A CURRENTLY VAua PERMIT OR APPROVAL? I DYes :SNO If yes, list agency name and permiUaDProval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSeo ACTION WIU EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REaUIRE MODIFICATION? DYes fiNO I CE"RTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVloeo ABOVe IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEOGE A..IICan"..~ Daniel Falasco, P.E. ...~4 t,lfft I - Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form betore proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 , 'V,~'V..,A;-- rn \},,-\. j '':/ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ?J Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Lydia A, Tonora .,;;;.~ ,;' S).~ ~ il~ ~~ ~; ;>> \:+",~~~ ~ BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOumOLD t " James Dinizio. Jr. Southold Thwn Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (5 I 6) 765- I 809 November 21, 1997 Messrs. Howard and Matt Pach.....n Pachman, Pachman and Brown, Esqs. 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, NY 11725 Re: Appl. of Bell-NYNEX Proposal at Orient (Phillips) Gentlemen: In reviewing the new local law which was adopted by the Town Board on November 12, 1997, it is requested that you update your application and modify the pending file based on the new law. Once you have had an opportunity to do that, we will review the documents and if you have any questions or concerns that you wish to address, let us know. Ve _/// Fax and Transmission to ~L Regular Mail GERARD P. CHAIRMAN . ~,. 0C'O ~ . ,~ VAt' €''''IM.f 0100) TOWN OF SOUTIlOlD, NEW YORK APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BUilDING INSPECTOR APPEAL ~lO.-~L/ f ~ DATE ./(/-f.:.?jf.0...... (f!~ TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N. Y. I, (We) ..?~.?~~.~..!~~.~~.'?~.!...!:.:.!';.:................ol R.~i[.lK...q...t1.lJ.RMX.....;;llJ)...Smit.htQ.\llIl...Ave. Nome 01 Appellant Street and Number 1177~ . ~ ..r:.~!!.J::.'?r::'rf.?r:-.~'!;J..f?'J.tf.!'.r..!'7.f'.(IJlI/"If.6.f:d'lli!f..'I.. f'1.f.!?!.~ ......~::-..................HEREBY APPEAL TO Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISiON OF THE BUilDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO. .................................... DATED ...................................................... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO 01 ......_.__..__..._uu..................................................._... Nome 01 Applicant lor permit .... si~~~i';;;';d' N~;;';b~;"'"'''''''''''''''''' "M;;~'i~'i~~ ii iy................... 'si~ i ~....................... PERMIT TO USE PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY 2.41l.5.U..Maj,IJ...RQ....Q.....Q);'.i..~J.\t..........R;:.~.Q........................... . Street /Hamlet / Use District on Zoning Mop ~2.~.~!..~.c:.:_~.~~.~_.~.:.:~.~.?!~91.~.!~.c~.9.?_~.?~..9.~_~.Current OWner Mark & Marybess Philips Mop No. . Lot No. Prior Owner. C.vl JI. B'1'/"-"'~I1>" 2. PROVISION (5) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section. Sub. section and Paragraph 01 the Zoning Ordinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article III Section 100-31 and buH: schedule 3. TYPE OF. APPEAL Appeal is mode herewith for (please check appropriate box) ( ) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lock of access (State of New York Tawn Low Chop. 62 Cons. Lows Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 ( ) .t. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal ~(has not) been mode with resp~ct to this decision 6f the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such eppeal was ( ) request for 0 special permit I ) request for 0 variance and was mode in Appeal No. ...................~............Dated .............................,........................................ REASON FOR APPEAL A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) OCX) ( ) Is requested for the reason that 17 ~ '1/; f El" c.- <'.- /'!; 3 S- J.z...:, I It;'~ pi.. ;S.~ Form ZBI (Continue on other side) . . REASON FOR APPEAL Conlinue<l I. STRICT APPLICATION OF THE ORDINANCE would produce practical difficulties or unneces- sary HARDSHIP because New York SMSA Limited PartnerShip, a New York Limited Partnership, in which CELLCO Partnership, an entity created by the merger of Bell Atlantic and NYNf Mobile Commuincations Company'in July 1995 is the General partner, a Public Utility as. defined by the New York State Public Service Law, and granted a Certificate of Public Necessity by the New York State Public Service ~ommission, and a license to operate, construct, maintain and operate a cellular telephone network by the Federal Communications Commission seeks permission to construct and operate a communications faCility cell site. 2. The hardship crealed is UNIQUE and is not shared by all properties alike in the Immediate vicinity of this properly and in Ihls use district because See above No. 1 3, The Variance would observe the spirit of the Ordinance and WOULD NOT CHANGE THE CIIARACTER OF THE DISTRICT because See above No. 1 STATE OF r~EW YORK COUNTY OF SuFf:..,J/<.. ) ) ss ) ~ " / (. ---. ' ...;....... ..... ....... " , .................................................... ' Signature " 5,...oro ..............~.'ft...... ........ day 6',....d~k.~................... 19''1t .......e..~. IOlary Pu 11.1"'" it\O'Jo.ao C. t "'e'" 't~ C ita'. 0 '" ,uau . t~ c..- olo"a:,.34'744Q, ~I /~1' ':;7 ... i,.pw.' ':{, ,-(/ I CDfWI"",.ton ( ( ,- ( JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk DATED: November 21, 1996 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 4446 - Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. /II1II6 - BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE for a Special Exception. Also included is: Application form for a variance; drawing of antenna; letter with attachments from Howard E. Pachman dated, November 19, 1996; letter from ZBA .to Mr. Daniel Falasco, P.E., dated November 18, 1996; 100' monopole structure and foundation design calculations; Short Environmental Assessment Form; and Notices to Adjacent Property Owners. ENGINEEReD ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED \O)~u; . ln1~_n . SUL(fH(iU't 1 ,j :~';'i PLANNiNr;~?1:~t{~._,.. 7830 OMlIIon Orlwo . M.~r. Ohio -140B0 Telephone: [211!l) 974-E!1OeO . Telel'8x: [218} 97 '" E?~ L_ Y-1 , J ~'_''''''''',.k BELL ATLANTIC NYNEXlNY 100' MONOPOLE STRUCTURE & FOUNDATION DESIGN CALCULATIONS SITE: ORIENT POINT EEl JOB NO.: NY 2033 REVISION I ! ~.- i i , -- I I I I I I I I I I - I - ,CMl.l NOltr a.acx *Ja': @ r7 lIlUI; (J) 1-' (ADS) 1C_1lI.1S I llllao1'II[D lJ'OIIl CA&E IotOISfAnllCMlrtlr APPROVAL r7 s ~ If ~~I'I>" = t~ffi · ~ li'a.~U~' s +- :'L-- _ _ 4: -Lo,IIWIIISNClCIICe 1M1U10lt eCl""'rs I......... to. 12 i~ 5 I.~.~ ..lIT':'! 'I>" ~'!i ~. - ~ J ~~... 5. ~ ~ ct '<. . 1 t~ : '\( .-' 11~~4;.'."H'a*U ~~... lJ 1""' CP[HING- i~ SECrrON "A-A" !! 1,1!r.QPOItMl;- SECTION '8-8' @SMIIlIA$llIEOUlltEO I.uz: n.NC( ".... ..."'''- o.::IiIOTIOSCAU: . c ~r"-"'!""r:=-- kI ~~ ~I ., , ~~ !~ -. !QJI;(12J10'[.UZ5)MlIICI.TS'1 .llUlflIDl'CIt~1FCIWI anACMelT MOlE:. CAaL ~Isr IlhO'oC '011 a.M1l"l' Q. JlD.LuYS 1QlIC. 1.1U10It eo. P\.ATS ,2........"1112 @ Ia'-" IM1tMCDIATt ~~_ I c--. ~"'~ I II r7 ./0'" 4'(. ~~I(!",:"",,, _ ('if.' / '.:n\- \~ "}J u.J.:P,( <>. . 0.$/ ~~.t"1D"'til ClIOCU [;:;.---~~ a. ." . . flY' 1.0. IWOQ.(~ ~ eo. I1.ATS J. 7 all . .... "'-OIJllCTlOJUll. ....,...., S (m'. .12l1U<<S) · .L ,- -;-r- -, I- ~ -" i; ,..rlO71'f MNClMClL!....c- J -- ~ = ~ ~.! . , ~ ;; 3-1: 117!r'OII'f:NIIlG- SECTION 'C-C' IImo.flU'lraW If)IOlIQ fCllt Q...MITY HANOHOLE DETAIL ~ o ,,. I. l/'Y.I In I -+ 1/...... , "r7Y -,., '/r. . 'I>" ~ ::. I - r"'" Cum ICX ICLr : . I 7 ~ _1l\.1,J".,J/l," I ~ I . J'.J J/'" f'-......".. · . I _lA'O'~'" W72-GIla) :............. rn T .IWCIlCIte liNG '-- ~. ./ \.V REIN. RING DETAIL <<>> 9' x 24" ACCESS PORT 9" x 24" ACCESS OPENING COVER PL DETAIL t~~I~~~l~ ltI....,t e, F\.AtS J.' ~CM.IOIMSlo(5) ~ ~ - I ~ 0. "'Y.".=::T: '\ t ~I +- I ~C ~ ~ II ~II=~~ -..oeCClaCJ:OT A.At1,. .12 , I~ I I I @- I (J'lT~"""", /r. 24- ACCUS QPOIllICffi ~ ~ ~ ra. ~ / W/COOO(M'2P\.ACU)Q] - e T .......wo. ~ I L~i~....J.""''''ffi I ~ a. A.A'5" .:0 _-.... I '" 1: (SUDlTAll) t-~ ~ ~I __ JOOlNT ~I ~ (')21/".'III'.O-lCMGi~ (UIS-<<*7S) IHCtG 1lI.1'I 5 .1(1l..~1.= ERECTION VIEW SCAlE NONE fi\ m.....a.:;. USE UP .TIIIIC ....... "'''''lIDt., \:..J ~>b-. USEIOT.srnIfC;........1E...~ ~~i ~ rr::.-":i: ~... '~.;o . =:U"';r::'! \. ~- ..... ll"~a~....;I &.:Iii.&-'..... ~ ~ ,............u $ ~f,~(.UI) ..,.. (l)1/W".MllUI GROUND lue IlF'T A It - " 1::1 /",. .... ,,,,,., r ,_'\4) NOlA IIltILLED . It'" i""'ID~J!r. ICI.t(I/f"OUP) 1IlOrE: Fat ..OIlIID ftIl.DWCES At SJL'.lXMt'SMIG.ClD. .;..exIlIC tCllICtS_~ICAlIorcs ~~"MODtlCfICN -....- 1t;..+" --t-.ti- I~,u T l: , , .~Ui!! '''!;;, ~i~ i~~. . .1;-= SECTION "0-0" ,J,,, lNSlot OT ......1F0lIM SHAft t:::\ BUSS BAR DETAIL ~ ". k1/2",,'/:I d .0-: ~ ~ :!I 5 ~ ~ ~t"R" It !i~l:~~ e 5.~~~. !: a ~iit~ t ~ i U:e~ a' L SECTION "E-E" 1-.:.1"......,"", I -+ r....-~\.,-'"'WI>. " "? ~IlllIJII.' I. IOU (112"0W') ;. ~ ~ I ft.1J".1/I'. 1 1.. I c.J..JJ(:; PI. ~"'4..314. .~ '..1 '_ _ (A.Sn-CillIU) ...,.... rT\ T .IWGl'ClIIC _1Me: ./----w REIN. RING DETAIL 0 19" x 32" ..;:cCESS PORT 15" x 24" ACCESS OPENING COVER PL DETAIL Ar -(- +-n- ~u:Aol I i; ~ ~l R ~" ~ ~~ ll.f ;;, " v'..... ..-(41 J/I"". 1/1" " CAJ07) tCX leU l: " , .' ~ ~,. ~, --' /~ S ~ ~ 1f;>l-Wi' s-r . IV / "" \ ~ . ~'''.. ~ - . tJ s '>/. ~. r, -1l "~:'; _ ;, . ';?J;~:,!", 'I< " ",.-, .~~ ;.d,\~\ : , ,', i\' ~_ -.' tfi : .... .y. -- / ,. .It.. - c";) j. .ft." ii. A;. "', '.....7 (If',/ V j'Q. '~\ -, ".-;~,,,,'rL'" . trj;~':;~ E&_~;~t\~ ~'t-f~"'l" i~\"\ s " STF'P Ant T f)F.TAfl -H= {OU<'@ I L~Li ~ I' I.....Jir. ,...,_..., S' _/ (2) IUL . KEU.UUS HOOK DETAIL . -- MA TERrAL REO'D. CAlVo WT. ON. &. & .~ --- 167.15 1.08 18.84 26.84 1.59 "~..,,,,.:1.~ ~ ~ ,~-- _t._. !.," I .........II;,_r. v.&r..,.' .........utl ~.^' ~ I,,,~.:..us ..._......T. ~.,...;J;. JS'IOt. ........ "~' "''''~ - 0& _.. ~. -~ 1--;::""'" "... r.,,,' .rt-r~ ... o !. :'-~r'~ & --- --- --- --- '15..2. 115.24 0.40 7." ~....... MMOClLE _lMe ~ ~~.,~,~EB ~C.S.ffi "........2G"t -~"...."... ,......... :JT* -r- & ~J ~l~~~ L:l: ...IIL ..J & & llJ2 461.01 81.12 JI.9S .---- ..----- 2 I J . '2 . , I I I I 1 12 2 1 12 1 1 I 1 1 'TEM I WI(. NO. 2 J + , . , + . . t . . 7 . . , t . 10 " 12 tJ .. " I. " 1. " 788J" CSI4806 78835 76336 .---- "'8110-3 510006 ---- 08100 08120 l.20tO 8-45.ooT.5 8-45.008.5 CSt 3220 1(10062 K'OOOO 1(10007 1(10012 K1000J ---- --- PER ASSEMBLY OESCRlpnON SHAFT ASSY. (ToP SECTION) SHAFT ASSV'. (WIOOlE SECTION) SHAFT ASSV'. (8QTTOU SECTION) ;:; I~ :~~~?.uo~':r:..~-I ::;;lIIlJ.I~!Sl.C.~~~".:{, HARDWARE AS FOlLOWS: SIn- .'II2".MMllMCJ.E ClMlI"''' J/8.' x I'" lONe C.H.H.C.S. ~~ r~15:.~~~~~~. 'mtMCO LOOlN.It 11 1/..' ~ ~~:4' lG. (AI!""~) _1\J:C1lll1 1Q,.f'S .r UI ICX 1llUI'J fAIt4-CIQoIL I.-ctI . ~?;~l ~. 'f;tf's:'.rno.lIIU~~V Ill. o S~ ......,. MO '" lEiIl[enCII g 8(r -0" SAFETY a.IMe KIT J. ~ .. ; E 20' -0. SAFETY a.IMe KIT SAFETY a.IMe HARNESS TOP SETTING TEuPlA TE BOT. SETTING TEuPLATE KELLUMS HOOK ASSY. '"55 BAR KIT 10'-8. INTERuEO(ATE PlATFORM ~i';)O~C:~~~.~T IEAOt _'oIIECUIDl _IOC( _IT 24"W1Q1E.tQ".o-u:. c:.-IU: IOOIST aooc . ~T-'SSI"""_IT LANCE SHIM KIT STRuCTURE IDENTIFICATION TAC ONE CAlLON TOUCH-UP PAINT ,....' . g ~ ~ " < N ~ = ~ z Io! i l! f o ~ TOTAL GALV. STRUCTURE WT._______________ 8 TOTAL ANCHOR BOLT & TEMPLATE WT._______ l;! SAFrTY D-IWB ATtAOtulNT DETAILS lLOCA.....-Q,r:I_',-, .2J'J~OIIIA ORIENT POINT SI TE: ORIENT, NY. 2r.QlOIEIII.... .,=.:, SECTION 'F -F" ...-.---- lAOf brIOIWICIUo1L --.,. ~ M~ A .tM,. tAG IlII.MD . It "'eM 'IlIU. . DlCIlAWD .... nc .......,...... ... AI __ .. ac U1PlAI,. aocx. (VIII.... 01 SIr ..... &&ftIlItI) ...~-.~.:..- ~._~.-,.-;. ", ", o ~I Z_ StRUCTURE RE-OESICN - :r ~J'W -..: ....-. .,.,. - 1)AU,.'CI.Dl~.III~II'I"".....S.D.l.l. "'_M_lTC ~ o z 21 =":~~=~II~.enOl~..aJ--...IIT ~ 11 '01: ~ .....' ..uo.o.'. A r _'ll>>I'''' -.a -..0 ... 4 :I: -...-. _ JIIOIlTtOCDOI lAOl....,T ,\I(.IOo.ucL IIC r :J: _lOiI'...CU___lJI....lOII11CClCl'lClll.nc_..-. ~ ::J:.:~:trio.~~~...=::...~~ i ....lOCD fair lIIOI Slot. III tJ ~ % U ~ 10 ~ ~ l! ~ % .1 nlUl....... lW,jft (,' ClIAI ..... ~In 01 0""051": ~1JI 'l.AI'S.omoC_IILa..uCZSI'OIIl,lllCllllllC,..-ftlQCl[!KIl SI lICmf1'CIllOTlIC~.C"OI~.~PllICnIUI 'IU -":""1111" 01 M.ut lJIUJ"'41101 _ "" nc l.CIICJII tren.. II ....ClTI.tr...IS..ca.tllllD..rllC~OTIICICIT1OI .CI100 MO ..r lIC ICIT101 01 nc: ~ .CflCIlo rc. IWQJIIC QUlI....~"A11IZII1G. f) lI'Q.tI ~ . !-Or CI~ ~_um Al"1(It'iIl8ltlCAfI.. _ 1ICIl ~"':1I1U1 ... IUL ~ t;N>.1"CtII nP 01 'ClCII1I1GMC ICImlM ........1'( ~. tIuLDlIII'IIAJo(Jrt-...I"(JlQlr. I) lICtIiIl"CIIl. IICL( '.oI'UI . C1."~ 111,"". .... - - DESIGN NOTES tlt:SlON IN ACCCIIlONICE 1I'l1M IEIA nulif' a "'" &ASIC WINO SP(EO 1/1"IIAOIAlla: CAS(1.otSICM IS MPIt IASIC: WI/IlO 5PUO CASlEIl-tlt:SlCM 7U OT IS ~ WINO _/1/2- ICE TKS DltA-.Q IS CClNF'lOOf1lAl. ",., YAY" NOT . lOMCtI. M:PRCDUaD. CQI'I[O (I THP -.a.L T CIlI iii L'NtT. CIlI .....PUlIuCIilIMTIIIAMClt.IMOl.ITK...t1[H c:c:wSOlT OT DtQICDI(O DUA~ frC,-AU. MCHt'S OF OIESIOtQlt~NrlClNM[.SEIt'oCO. E8:""'''ER<' EHlXA\j()lItS . (tie) "'''-lIOeo IJrtCClFlPOltAtm . '7830 DI.....1oo Drt... .....tor. 011. ~ 100'-0" MONOPOLE BELL A TLANTIC!NYNEX _~I::t": I.;:I~ -IOC I I I ~4QQ41 ~ o z :I . '" w I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEERED ENDEAVORlI Customer BELL A TLANTIC/NYNEX By M.R.MOREL RING PLATE 0 80' INCORPORATED Structure SITE NAME: ORIENT POINT .t '" b ~ N '" . ,,"- "' . , ~o.\.f '\~ NOTE: IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PURCHASER TO VERIFY THA T THE 'MND LOADS AND DESIGN CRITERIA SPECIFIED MEET THE REOUIREMENTS OF ALL LOCAL BUILDING CODES ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS, INC. 100' MONOPOLE 10/5/96 Date NY 2033 Job/Quote No. Checked REVISION I ANTENNA LOADING: (12) ALP 9212 ANTENNAS @ 82' STD. AMPS PLATFORM @ 82' DESIGN NOTES: DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH EIA 222E & F 85 MPH BASIC WIND SPEED 1/2" RADIAL ICE CASE I - DESIGN 85 MPH BASIC WIND SPEED CASE II - DESIGN 75% OF 85 MPH WIND WITH 1/2" ICE 7830 Division Drive * Mentor, Ohio 44060 Telephone: (216) 974-6060 . Telefax: (216) 974-9238 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Engineered Endeavors Inc. 7830 Division Drive Mentor, Ohio 44060 Tel (216) 974-6060 Fax (216) 974-9238 Communications Structure Nonlinear Analysis and Design Program 19:40:00 10-04-1996 Revision 1.0 - 7/29/96 Engineer: M.R.MOREL Customer Job Name Structure Location Site BELL ATLANTIC/NYNEX NY 2033 REV I 100' MONOPOLE ORIENT POINT OD OD NUM. THICK TAPER LENGTH JOINT JOINT YIELD WEIGHT JOINT BOT TOP SIDES INCH IN/FT FT INCH TYPE KSI LBS HEIGHT 19.48 15.50 12 0.1875 0.221 18.00 0.00 FLANGE 65.0 638. 82.00 29.69 19.48 12 0.2500 0.221 46.13 51. 00 SLIP 65.0 3064. 38.00 37.00 28.12 12 0.3125 0.221 40.13 0.00 BASEPL 65.0 4415. 0.00 TOTAL TUBE WEIGHT 8117. POUNDS POLE SHAFT LENGTH 100.00 FEET E 29600.0 KSI UNIT WGT = 0.283 LBS/eu IN AISC constants are used for stress reductions. Internal bend radius = 3 X T Tube diameters are measured flat to flat. Stresses are calculated across points. Tube diameters are increased by 1.040 for wind across points. Drag coefficients are increase by 1.300 for steps on the pole. AISC Tube Shape Coefficient of 1.000 is applied. REVISED DATA FILE NAME 2033-100 APPURTENANCES DESCRIPTION NUM. ELEV. Kz AREA WGT Ca < WITHOUT ICE > 4.00 30. 2.0000 33.75 2000. 1.0000 AREA WGT Ca FACTOR < WITH ICE > 4.50 60. 2.0000 0.75 42.20 3000. 1.0000 1.00 ALP 9212 STD AMPS PLATFORM 12 80. 1.288 1 80. 1.288 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Engineered Endeavors Inc. 100' MONOPOLE NY 2033 RE PAGE 2 LOAD CASE 1 BASIC LOADING DEAD LOAD FACTOR 1.00 WIND PSF REDUCTION 1.00 RADIAL ICE 0.00 IN. WIND VELOCITY 85 BOTTOM 33.39 PSF MAX BASE ROTATION 0.00 DEG TOP 45.23 PSF ALP 9212 STD AMPS PLATFORM APPLIED APPURTENANCE FORCES ELEVATION WEIGHT WIND FT KIPS KIPS 80.00 0.360 2.899 80.00 2.000 1.359 TUBE PROPERTIES I MEMBER FORCES I STRESSES I STRESS I TOTAL ELEV DIAM WALL SHEAR BENDING AXIAL AXIAL BEND. ALLOW RATIOS DEFL TILT FT IN IN K K-FT K KSI KSI KSI IN DEG 100.00 15.50 0.1875 0.29 0.00 0.14 0.02 0.00 51.99 0.00 30.7 2.33 91. 00 17.49 0.1875 0.88 2.57 0.43 0.04 0.70 51.99 0.01 26.4 2.32 82.00 19.48 0.1875 0.88 10.50 0.43 0.04 2.29 51. 99 0.04 22.0 2.28 TYPE OF JOINT: FLANGE 82.00 19.48 0.2500 1. 27 10.50 0.68 0.04 1. 74 51. 99 0.03 22.0 2.28 80.00 19.92 0.2500 6.15 13.04 3.25 0.21 2.06 51.99 0.04 21.1 2.28 68.00 22.58 0.2500 7.00 86.78 3.91 0.22 10.62 51. 99 0.21 15.5 2.11 58.00 24.79 0.2500 7.81 156.76 4.82 0.24 15.87 51. 99 0.31 11.3 1. 85 48.00 27.00 0.2500 8.64 234.87 5.55 0.26 19.99 51. 99 0.39 7.8 1. 54 38.00 29.22 0.2500 8.64 321. 24 5.55 0.24 23.31 51. 99 0.45 4.9 1. 20 TYPE OF JOINT: SLIP JOINT 38.00 28.59 0.3125 9.64 321. 24 7.18 0.25 19.61 51. 99 0.38 4.9 1. 20 24.00 31. 69 0.3125 10.74 456.16 8.56 0.27 22.60 51.99 0.44 2.0 0.76 12.00 34.35 0.3125 11.83 585.01 9.95 0.29 24.62 51. 99 0.48 0.5 0.38 0.00 37.00 0.3125 11. 24 727.01 10.68 0.29 26.31 51. 99 0.51 0.0 0.00 REACTION COMPONENTS (KIPS AND FT-KIPSl TRANSVERSE VERTICAL WIND MOMENT ABOUT MOMENT ABOUT MOMENT ABOUT SHEAR FORCE SHEAR TRANSVERSE VERTICAL WIND AXIS 0.000 -10.677 12.394 727.008 0.000 0.000 . . I I I I I I I I I I I I I Engineered Endeavors Inc. 100' MONOPOLE NY 2033 RE PAGE 3 LOAD CASE 2 BASIC LOADING w/ICE DEAD LOAD FACTOR 1.00 WIND PSF REDUCTION 0.75 RADIAL ICE 0.50 IN. WIND VELOCITY 85 BOTTOM 25.04 PSF MAX BASE ROTATION 0.00 DEG TOP 33.92 PSF ALP 9212 STD AMPS PLATFORM APPLIED APPURTENANCE FORCES ELEVATION WEIGHT WIND FT KIPS KIPS 80.00 0.720 2.446 80.00 3.000 1.274 TUBE PROPERTIES I MEMBER FORCES I STRESSES I STRESS I TOTAL ELEV DIAM WALL SHEAR BENDING AXIAL AXIAL BEND. ALLOW RATIOS DEFL TILT FT IN IN K K-FT K KSI KSI KSI IN DEG 100.00 15.50 0.1875 0.23 0.00 0.19 0.02 0.00 51.99 0.00 25.8 1. 96 91.00 17 .49 0.1875 0.71 2.06 0.60 0.06 0.56 51.99 0.01 22.1 1. 95 82.00 19.48 0.1875 0.71 8.42 0.60 0.05 1. 84 51. 99 0.04 18.5 1. 92 TYPE OF JOINT: FLANGE 82.00 19.48 0.2500 1. 01 8.43 0.91 0.06 1. 39 51.99 0.03 18.5 1. 92 80.00 19.92 0.2500 5.28 10.44 4.99 0.32 1. 65 51.99 0.04 17.7 1. 92 68.00 22.58 0.2500 5.95 73.74 5.99 0.33 9.03 51.99 0.18 13.0 1. 77 58.00 24.79 0.2500 6.58 133.20 6.82 0.35 13.49 51. 99 0.27 9.5 1. 56 48.00 27.00 0.2500 7.21 198.94 7.72 0.36 16.93 51. 99 0.33 6.5 1. 29 38.00 29.22 0.2500 7.21 271. 02 7.72 0.33 19.67 51.99 0.38 4.1 1. 00 TYPE OF JOINT: SLIP JOINT .38.00 28.59 0.3125 7.98 271. 02 9.57 0.34 16.55 51. 99 0.32 4.1 1. 00 24.00 31. 69 0.3125 8.81 382.66 11. 22 0.36 18.96 51. 99 0.37 1.6 0.64 12.00 34.35 0.3125 9.64 488.40 12.88 0.38 20.55 51.99 0.40 0.4 0.32 0.00 37.00 0.3125 9.18 604.07 13.74 0.37 21.86 51. 99 0.43 0.0 0.00 REACTION COMPONENTS (KIPS AND FT-KIPSl TRANSVERSE VERTICAL WIND MOMENT ABOUT MOMENT ABOUT MOMENT ABOUT SHEAR FORCE SHEAR TRANSVERSE VERTICAL WIND AXIS 0.000 -13.741 10.061 604.067 0.000 0.000 I I I I I I I I Engineered Endeavors Inc. 100' MONOPOLE NY 2033 RE ELEV 100.00 91.00 82.00 80.00 68.00 58.00 48.00 38.00 24.00 12.00 0.00 SUMMARY TABLE STRESS RATIO AXIAL 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.43 0.04 0.43 0.04 3.25 0.21 3.91 0.31 4.82 0.39 5.55 0.45 5.55 0.44 8.56 0.48 9.95 0.51 10.68 BENDING 0.0 2.6 10.5 13.0 86.8 156.8 234.9 321.2 456.2 585.0 727.0 MAXIMUM SUPPORT MOMENT K-FT CORRESPONDING AXIAL FORCE KIPS CORRESPONDING SHEAR FORCE KIPS LOADING 1 BASIC 1 BASIC 1 BASIC 1 BASIC 1 BASIC 1 BASIC 1 BASIC 1 BASIC 1 BASIC 1 BASIC 1 BASIC 727.01 10.68 11.24 PAGE 4 LOADING LOADING LOADING LOADING LOADING LOADING LOADING LOADING LOADING LOADING LOADING I I I I I I I I I Engineered Endeavors Inc. 100' MONOPOLE NY 2033 RE Base with on a BASE PLATE AT ELEVATION TUBE DIAMETER DESIGN MOMENT DESIGN MOMENT IS BOLTS ARE ON THE APPLIED AXIAL FORCE APPLIED SHEAR BOLT DATA BOLT TYPE BOLTS ARE CLUSTERED SPACING BETWEEN BOLTS ANGLE BETWEEN BOLTS DIAMETER EFFECTIVE AREA TOTAL LENGTH MINIMUM EMBEDMENT NUMBER OF BOLTS BOLT CIRCLE DIAMETER ALLOWABLE STRESS APPLIED AXIAL STRESS MAX BOLT FORCE BOLT BENDING STRESS COMBINED BOLT STRESS CLEARANCE UNDER PLATE BOLT WEIGHT PLATE DATA PAGE 5 0.00 FEET 37.00 INCHES 727.0 KIP FT O. DEGREES FROM THE WIND DIRECTION KNUCKLES OF THE TUBE 10.7 KIPS 11.24 KIPS A615 GR75 6.000 15.189 2.250 3.250 7.0 5.0 8 45.00 60.0 30.0 97.4 2.0 32.0 3.25 618.1 INCHES DEGREES INCHES SQ IN FEET FEET INCHES KSI KSI KIPS KSI KSI INCHES POUNDS WIDTH OF TRIM ROUND 43.00 INCHES DIAMETER OF TRIM ROUND 51.50 INCHES ORIENTATION: BENDING ACROSS POINTS MATERIAL A871 GR60 PROVIDED THICKNESS 2.500 INCHES REQUIRED THICKNESS 1.764 INCHES BOLT HOLE DIAMETER 2.625 INCHES CENTER HOLE SIZE 32.00 INCHES NET WEIGHT 642.8 POUNDS RAW STOCK WEIGHT 1308.2 POUNDS SURFACE AREA 12.62 SQ FT ALLOWABLE STRESS 60.00 KSI MAX APPLIED STRESS 29.88 KSI Plate - use 43.00 inch TRIM ROUND x 2.500 inch A871 GR60 ( 8) 2.250 diameter x 11.00 foot caged A615 GR75 bolts 45.00 inch bolt circle I I I I I I I I Engineered Endeavors Inc. 100' MONOPOLE NY 2033 RE FLANGE AT ELEVATION TUBE DIAMETER DESIGN MOMENT DESIGN MOMENT IS BOLTS ARE ON THE APPLIED AXIAL FORCE APPLIED SHEAR BOLT DATA BOLT TYPE BOLTS ARE EVENLY SPACED DIAMETER EFFECTIVE AREA TOTAL LENGTH NUMBER OF BOLTS BOLT CIRCLE DIAMETER ALLOWABLE STRESS APPLIED AXIAL STRESS MAX BOLT FORCE . ;;; PLATE DATA DIAMETER OF PLATE MATERIAL PROVIDED THICKNESS REQUIRED THICKNESS BOLT HOLE DIAMETER CENTER HOLE SIZE NET WEIGHT RAW STOCK WEIGHT SURFACE AREA ALLOWABLE STRESS MAX APPLIED STRESS PAGE 6 82.00 FEET 19.48 INCHES 10.5 KIP FT O. DEGREES FROM THE KNUCKLES OF THE TUBE 0.4 KIPS 0.88 KIPS WIND DIRECTION A325 1. 000 0.785 5.0 12 25.75 44.0 2.1 1.7 INCHES SQ IN INCHES INCHES KSI KSI KIPS 28.50 INCHES A871 GR60 1. 500 INCHES o . 211 INCHES 1. 250 INCHES 14 . 48 INCHES 194.6 POUNDS 344.8 POUNDS 6 . 37 SQ FT 60.00 KSI 1.19 KSI Flange - use 28.50 inch ROUND x 1.500 inch A871 GR60 with (12) 1.000 diameter x 5.00 inch A325 bolts on a 25.75 inch bolt circle I I I I I I I I I I ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED 7830 Division Drive Mentor, OH 44060 Tel.(216)974-6060 DESIGN CALCULATIONS FOR DRILLED PIER FOUNDATION . BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX 100 ft Monopole Orient Point Cellular Site Orient, NY EEl Project No. NY2033 October 4, 1996 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SAND -17.0 ~ Af , uMJl F~I =11 :ffil E ;ill, Bf -23.0 -~ . <0 I -III II. 1JTf~~TII m~~ '" "'-III=IIr-:='1'- (8) 2 '/4". x 11'-0" ANCHOR BOLT ORIENTATION REQUIRED 45.00". BOlT CIRCLE L A - A (TEMPLA TE NOT SHOWN) , TEMPLA:-Y A MA TERIAL LIST ITEM DTY. LENGTH DESCRIPTION . ANCHOR BOLT PROJECTION FOUNDA nON LOADING CD 8 11'-0" 2 1/4". ANC. BOLTS N A615-GR.75 . N MOMENT, kip-It 1315.3 CD 16 23'-6" 11 (ASTM A615-GR.60 Ii N CD '311~IEIII SHEAR, kips 17.6 25 16'-6" #5 (ASTM A615-GR.60) '=JI=IEW .....11. AXIAL, kips 13.2 CONCRETE (cub. yd.) 23.5 4000 psi STEEL (Ibs.) 2600.0 ASTM A-615 GR.60 . N. - <0 OJ.... .., N N N 3 2 1B . N 2 (16) #" L=23'-6" (25) #5 L=16'-6" 3 57". REBAR CAGE 3" MIN PIER 66". B - B GENERAL NOTES: 1. FOUNDATION DESIGN IS BASED ON THE SOIL REPORT PROVIDED BY SLACKE TEST BORING, INC. ON SEPTEMBER 12, 1996. PROJECT NO. 5304-96. 2. GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION IS REQUIRED. SOIL REPORT SHOULD BE CONSULTED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. PIER EMBEDMENT IS SHOWN FROM THE GROUND ELEVATION AT THE TIME OF SOIL INVESTIGATION. SHOULD THE ACTUAL SOIL CONDITIONS DIFFER THAN THOSE SHOWN IN THE SOIL REPORT, THE FOUNDATION DESIGNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED TO RE-EVALUATE THE FOUNDATION DESIGN. 4. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A615-87 WITH A MINIMUM YIELD STRESS OF 60 KSI. REBAR CAGE SHALL BE ASSEMBLED' USING STEEL WIRE. WELDING OF VERTICAL AND CROSSING BARS IS NOT PERMITTED. SPLICES SHAlL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318-89 Ch. 12. MINIMUM SPLICE LENGTH - 6 It. 5. CONCRETE MIX DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ACI 318-89. 6. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. 7. ANCHOR BOLT ORIENTATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT. 8. REFER TO EEl DWG. NO. GS49941 FOR ANCHOR BOLTS, TEMPLATES AND BASE PLATE DETAILS AND REQUIREMENTS. FOUNDATION INSTALLER MUST VERIFY ANCHOR BOLT LENGTH, QUANTITY, .AND PATTERN PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT. 9. GROUWDING BY OTHERS. 10. FOUNDATIO~.~, DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318-89 AND f;,IAytJ1G,.~... ~jl~\ . ~ '^ J ;:;' ;'~ I /;':.9.. " ,~\t\\P 'c" ~ E8:'<€EREO [NOEAYORS lNCClAPORA 1tD 7830 Division Driveco Mecontor, Ohio 44060 (216)974-6060 c BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE 100 It MONOPOLE ORIENT POINT CELLUlAR SITE ORIENT, NY ......... IlELlASE Of:sCRtPnoN CMTE PROJ[CT NO: 01/'''" NY2033 -BY I.S.F. 0<<. BY -... F2033-82.1 I I I I I I I I . - !! . FOUNDATION DESIGN CALCULATIONS FOR DRILLED PIER FOUNDATION ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS INC. 7830 Dk1don Drive. Mentor. OhIo 44060 T..'(216)91........ . ''''(216)974-9138 DATE 18-S.".96 OU6PM CUSTOMER BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX JOB NY 2033 STRUcrURE 82' MONOPOLE LOCATION ORIENT, NY SITE ORIENT POINT FOUNDATION LOADS MOMENT SH...... AXIAL LOAD ft., .. .. in.JbI; .. .. l1BC:I.3liUft.k) UBC:LJlIltb&\ UBC:O.9dObI.) ... ... ... OPERATIONAL ... ... D.D D.D " DD 13lH 17.6 13.2 SURVIVAL 15783600.0 17600.0 13200.0 1709.9 22.9 11.9 FOUNDATION PROPERTIES MIN.DIAM.,in 63.00 PIER 0 AAEA;n^2 MOM OF IN. . 930948.0 ANCH. BOLTS 11.0 A.B. Cllt DlAM . .4~.OO "D )0421.6 SOIL INFORMATION LAVERNQ. roPIBOT OF LAYER TOPIBOT OF LA YEA. . VALUE "" GAMMA , VALUE .,D ,ft, (m' ,_, '''''' ....... ~... (Win-.L SAND 0 0 60 30 120 3.0 36 0.069 DENSE SAND 3.0 36 ISO 34 120 17.0 204 0.069 DENSE SAND 17.0 204 90 34 58 30.0 360 0.033 NORM. SOIL PER EIA-222F.ft ACruAL EMBEDM. LENGTH.ft TOTAL LENGTH.ft L- La- La- 21.89 23.00 24.00 CONCRETE. cub.yd STELL I'" 21.12 2433.3 288.00 I I I REINFORCEMENT I UNF ACTORED MOMENT, in--lbs UNFACTOREDSHE~I~ MAX. (FACTOR) BEND. MOMENT IN PlLE,m-I~ MAX. (FACTOR) SHEAR FORCE IN PlLE,1bo I CONCRETE,psi STEEL, grade REINFORCEMENT I o LONG. REINF. LATERAL TIES II , I MIN. REQ'D STEEL,m^2 LONG. REINF. NO. OF BARS REQ'D NO. OF BARS ACTUAL As,in^2 ACT. STEEL RATIO STEEL CAGE DlAM.in SPACING. in LATERAL TIES NO. OF TIES MAX. ALlDW. SPAC.,in VERTIC. SP ACING,in STRESS IN REBARS,psi I 2 3 4 , 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 I I - RESISTANCE TO SHEAR IN CONCRETE MAX. AlLOW. S~ lOp' MAX SHEAR FORCE IN PILE,kips WEIGHT OF STEEL,I~ Oil 0' TOTAL STEEL,lbI STEEL,lbo'ft CONCRETE,yd^3 CONCRETE,yd^3fft DIA.in J.410 0.625 16'8??oo 117SOO 21"4000 152750 4000 60 17.1J II 16 24.96 0.0073 57.00 11.19 2' 22-'6 12.00 0.00 252.51 466.59 609.62 659.85 609.62 466.'9 252.51 0.00 -252.51 -466.59 --609.62 517.60 152.75 1997.69 435.66 2433.35 101.39 21.)2 0.88 Ain^2 I.S6O 0.310 WGHT Iblft 5.313 1.043 13 14 I' 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 -659.85 -609.62 466.59 -252.51 0.00 0.00 .. .. .. I I I I I I I I I ******************************************************* * PROGRAM LPILE 4 . 0 * * eC) COPYRIGHT ENSOFT, INC., 1993 * * ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * * ----------------------------------------------- * * * * Prepared for * * * * Engineered Endeavors, Inc. * * 7830 Division Drive * * Mentor, OH 44060 * * License No. 776-030695 * * * * Program to be used only by Licensee * * Duplication permitted only for backup copy * * * ******************************************************* PROGRAM LPILE Version 4.0 eC) COPYRIGHT 1986, 1987, 1989, 1993 ENSOFT, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ORIENT POINT UNITS--ENGLISH UNITS I N PUT I N FOR MAT ION ********************************* THE LOADING IS STATIC -------------------------- PILE GEOMETRY AND PROPERTIES ---------------------------- PILE LENGTH = 288.00 IN 2 POINTS X DIAMETER MOMENT OF AREA INERTIA IN IN IN**4 IN**2 .00 66.000 .931D+06 .342D+04 288.00 66.000 .931D+06 .342D+04 MODULUS OF ELASTICITY LBSjIN**2 .300D+07 .300D+07 SOILS INFORMATION ----------------- X AT THE GROUND I SURFACE SLOPE AT THE GROUND SURFACE = 12.00 IN = .00 DEG. I I I I I I I I 3 LAYER(S) OF SOIL LAYER 1 THE SOIL IS A SAND - P-Y CRITERIA BY X AT THE TOP OF THE LAYER = X AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LAYER = MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION = LAYER 2 THE SOIL IS A SAND - P-Y CRITERIA BY X AT THE TOP OF THE LAYER = X AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LAYER = MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION = LAYER 3 THE SOIL IS A SAND - P-Y CRITERIA BY X AT THE TOP OF THE LAYER = X AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LAYER = MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION = REESE ET AL, 1974 12.00 IN 48.00 IN .6000+02 LBS/IN**3 REESE ET AL, 1974 48.00 IN 216.00 IN .1500+03 LBS/IN**3 REESE ET AL, 1974 216.00 IN 372.00 IN .9000+02 LBS/IN**3 DISTRIBUTION OF EFFECTIVE UNIT WEIGHT WITH DEPTH 4 POINTS X,IN WEIGHT,LBS/IN**3 12.00 .690-01 216.00 .690-01 216.00 .330-01 372.00 .330-01 . . DISTRIBUTION OF STRENGTH PARAMETERS 6 POINTS C,LBS/IN**2 .0000+00 .0000+00 .0000+00 .0000+00 .0000+00 .0000+00 X,IN 12.00 48.00 48.00 216.00 216.00 372.00 BOUNDARY AND LOADING CONDITIONS ------------------------------ LOADING NUMBER 1 BOUNDARY-CONDITION CODE LATERAL LOAD AT THE PILE HEAD MOMENT AT THE PILE HEAD AXIAL LOAD AT THE PILE HEAD WITH DEPTH PHI, DEGREES .3000+02 .3000+02 .3400+02 .3400+02 .3400+02 .3400+02 = 1 .1760+05 LBS .1580+08 IN-LBS .1320+05 LBS = = FINITE-DIFFERENCE PARAMETERS NUMBER OF PILE INCREMENTS = DEFLECTION TOLERANCE ON DETERMINATION OF CLOSURE = MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS ALLOWED FOR PILE ANALYSIS = MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DEFLECTION = E50 100 .1000-03 IN 100 .780+03 IN I I I I I I I I I I . OUTPUT CODES KOUTPT = 1 KPYOP = 0 INC = 10 OUT PUT I N FOR MAT ION ********************************* LOADING NUMBER 1 BOUNDARY CONDITION CODE LATERAL LOAD AT THE PILE HEAD MOMENT AT THE PILE HEAD AXIAL LOAD AT THE PILE HEAD = 1: .1760+05 .1580+08 .1320+05 LBS' IN-LBS LBS = = = X DEFLECTION MOMENT SHEAR SOIL TOTAL FLEXURAL REACTION STRESS RIGIDITY IN IN LBS-IN LBS LBS/IN LBS/IN**2 LBS-IN**2 ***** ********** ********** ********** ********** ********** ********** .00 .2990+00 .1580+08 .1760+05 .0000+00 .5630+03 .2790+13 28.80 .2400+00 .1630+08 .1550+05 -.2420+03 .5810+03 .2790+13 57.60 .1860+00 .1660+08 .2640+04 -.7470+03 .5910+03 .2790+13 86.40 .1370+00 .1630+08 -.2760+05 -.1250+04 .5800+03 .2790+13 115.20 .9220-01 .1490+08 -.6430+05 -.1240+04 .5330+03 .2790+13 144.00 .5210-01 .1260+08 -.9620+05 -.9270+03 .4500+03 .2790+13 172.80 .1570-01 .9510+07 -.1150+06 -.3480+03 .3410+03 .2790+13 201. 60 -.1780-01 .6160+07 -.1140+06 .4710+03 .2220+03 .2790+13 230.40 -.4950-01 .3150+07 -.9410+05 .8710+03 .1150+03 .2790+13 259.20 -.8030-01 .8960+06 -.5850+05 .1620+04 .3560+02 .2790+13 288.00 -.1110+00 .0000+00 .0000+00 .2290+04 .3860+01 .2790+13 OUTPUT VERIFICATION THE MAXIMUM MOMENT IMBALANCE FOR ANY ELEMENT = -.1410-03 IN-LBS THE MAX. LATERAL FORCE IMBALANCE FOR ANY ELEMENT = -.2710-04 LBS **** WARNING **** MAXIMUM MOMENT IMBALANCE FOR ANY ELEMENT = -.1410-03 IN-LBS OUTPUT SUMMARY PILE-HEAD DEFLECTION = .2990+00 IN COMPUTED SLOPE AT PILE HEAD = .2130-02 MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT = .1660+08 LBS-IN MAXIMUM SHEAR FORCE = -.1180+06 LBS NO. OF ITERATIONS = 9 NO. OF ZERO DEFLECTION POINTS = 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I < BOUNDARY CONDITION BCl .17600+05 SUM MAR Y TAB L E ************************* BOUNDARY CONDITION BC2 .15780+08 AXIAL LOAD LBS .13200+05 PILE HEAD DEFLECTION IN .29920+00 MAX. MOMENT IN-LBS .16580+08 MAX. SHEAR LBS -.11750+06 If..~':" .~ ~- . ..~ ~. }. "0 'R'" ~ = "- g.". ,:;d 111'0 . ~ 7:....~ ,,~ (d "d ~;Z 11===0 lE= -. ." h~ i--., 'i"J:=1 'cJ:l ~p -4 ~ U N .~ = ~ ") . ~, = l==1 ~~ . >~ l==1 """,'"' ... " " f= Z ;~ Q ~ ~ '7' -~. , ~ \i\}. ~7} ~'" ~~(,4\\~ ~\;~~ ,) /~'lJ1 l~ XOy" ~ ') /VyP/tI,L ~~L- ~iC'[' ~ / I f;~~! jj) /7l I I~; I ~v" ~~fJ3 7 VISUAL IM:PACT ANALYSIS PROPOSED MONOPOLE SITE 24850 MAIN ROAD HAi'VILET OF ORIENT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: Pa..hman, pll..hm'ln, Brown & Farneti, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, New York 11725 Prepared by: Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. 368 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, New York 11725 December, 1996 \1 _U -f . ~ ~ ; I 1 :f I .. VISUAL ANALYSIS Inspection of Proposed Monopole Location The proposed monopole site is located nn Main Road within the boundaries of the Hamlet of Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County (hereinafter "subject property"). The subject property is siruated on the south side of Main Road apprOlcimately 344 feet east of Platt Road (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The monopole is to be located approximately 440 feet southeast of Main Road in the center of the property (see Figure 1 - Monopole Site Plan). The subject property is vacant farmland with three strips of pines in the central and southern portions of the property. In the cleared farm field just north of the strip of pine trees in the central portion of the property is the specific proposed location of the monopole. Overhead utility lines and poles, marure trees, commercial development, houses, farms and open farmland are visible along Main Road in Orient (Photograph No.1). The proposed monopole is approximately 100 feet in height and consists of a single pole with a triangular top. It is a grayish/blue color and its width tapers from the base to the top (see Phorograph No.2 for a recently constnIcted monopole in East Mattiruck). Inspection of Proximate Areas Visual inspection indicates that the site on which the monopole is proposed to be erected is surrounded by open farmland, farms, commercial uses, municipal buildings and residential uses. The topography of subject site and immediate surrounding area is relatively level as can be seen from Figure 1. 2 .. r ( ! , ~. . ;{ " ~ , I i I f I ,~ , ( INTRODUCTION Al'<1) METHODOLOGY A visual analysis was performed to detelmine if the proposed monopole location at 24850 Main Road, Orient would have a significant adverse aesthetic impact on the neighboring community. In order to conduct this visual analysis, [he following methodology was employed: . Visual inspection of the proposed monopole location and evaluation of physical characteristics of proposed monopole; . Visual inspection of proximate areas to determine existing obstructions in the horizon; . Visual inspection of a recently constructed monopole site to determine its impact on the communi~': . Line-of-sight analyses from proximate areas; and . Completion of visual resource summaries and assessment forms pursuant to the Visual Resources Assessment Procedure for u. S. Anny Corps of Engineers. I f !l .II i' I ;~ ~ r I I i l , , Table of Contents Page Introduction and Methodology ... 1 Visual Analysis 2 Conclusions .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11 Figure 1 - Site Location Map. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 2 - Topographic Map ....... ..... Figure 3 - Line-of-Sight Analysis Areas ....... 3 4 7 Photographs Appendix A - Visual Resource Summaries and Assessment Forms .. " ...:.. I" ~,;",,,",;,,,,~"_""~ ",~' 0';':" ,"'~~".4,..,.. ."."....... ~:--,-if~'~,,:";",:"::':';';:;~ r 2! ff ------- '0---------- -. '-l lro Ni --'---- :;;.]4 @___ -.~'--?'=::::=,-___ 0) ------- / ---- ~.....:::.==-. -:--'-~ --------- 31 .- ./ --.~ - ~./. "", " 27 "_____ - /./ -.? ~'. :.~.~~~'-~ '.I,ulfard Pt -- U )e // ..-lP"../' /-- .-;::,~\~ ' ," "0" n 2~:'; //2& //././..:>/ ---...._~.;.,. c/-,-) .+ <~~~ //</+ /' /.- . ~o .-/". + '~" 23~, +/~ 3</1".,'.., ,;:;-'ii;;,>/'" 'ljJJ;'.;?-:~ u.,~:':-' +<"'-':?,-~Biil':.Y J\ .// ~ ~~'. .,/:tfi'.'l' Ir ___''-,_'~-t",.... ~,,~tt)J.~____---;::'-;/'~ !. ' , / / . --- ...~. ,,'::--. ----.:(..~-- ~-- ~I --;/ ---:: ---:--- ,..~ (' (I -"'-::"...)~\:-IO__ ~'~'I\ '. I J4 ///,;;;~~' , ,~/ 'c .J\ ',.." ~,:,\\ . ""~ \:, ;P .~l~>/ .J /' / .' O. V? . jI1.;;"~'::t-. .' ':' )0:;', Bt:l.(..;~ \. - '. ',\I', ( ,.- "':;' .. . C :::../ ,'" ,--' $:,.". 1 ; .. ." I '------ , '.\~ . l',:,dH~lI __ "- J ">>,....Jj. i' "'\' .~.~..?.i;...:""'7'-r.' . ,...... 'Y\-S.tn~. r-- ) -.~.j' '-0..~"""- \ _.{~ ~- :~~/::.... +'~. .~...'- ""~. . ,...\\~.~ il :, ,,,--' '.' 'r v" - --- ~ I "," . ..' . . c ' . f ',; )J;t'~~~;CC~ \,/';-\ '" " "...1:,/. 5-_.",~ - /' rId "f" '--. ( .,e' ~\'/<lii(r>'~=~," -.~ .... " .,.... / ';".:.; ";~-'~"-"-">"':.i,.. -- - - .:;..,.:'~. :;"-.:::.... ' .\tllilJC~ " \.\ . ,{ . ~ 7_" _. r-::! Ji.': _ _ ..:. ,..:.... '~. ..:_~'- ~-".1" '.. ...: . \':'. ~."... 'li:f.l':.-,' ..::<~:t':'~':~;:"::'_~~'2: s:} /";.' '~.'- " -~ "i.'l :1,' . ''''-'''' ""'". '" ",t, f >J \ c ....,~~~=:_~_~ __ '. ' .' 'JQ"'~ - ~I", I. - \ .- ,C,.",I '\.' "':"") ,~., ,k ~.~___ __....__ __ _, ...,.. . .- '-"" ., -. 'l' ..' '" .~ '-" .' Z - '\ "" y,....."...- '.. _ - - , '.' .. '.- ~-"..., ,\ "Ce 1..... " """V ~._____.... __... ...... ~, .~ ".'.~<:'" :/:~':>':';'----t1-_. "'-~ h.'.....: 'OrienC.f!.' , !:!! :.....t....'-~!._J ;...- 0 /'-==:'--=10' '.....,: "'_/ ...... "~pc i'-C.i"/'--'-,-~" ~ g"'~\'IJ!'.. -..~'.:.'_- ~'''" .....".-ti1.-- :, .......:!::J ""'" "_; ii ):)( \. ~t~ ')":. ::'f,*:O;f\..'ro,,"\~'-_~_///" -. ''''1''}1~'.J'' ~';::~~;1.81. '3 -/" ..' :\- >;';,1;1 IS ,If. \', '-,1~.t;;1.'!"':11'~, 'j \ ,) . .'9..........".... I ~ 1 '..- Pt Eagl~s Ne~~ \. "p':''';' ' ,- I \, \.. r . \ . , '" o.'l..... \~'S] . z \ 0.."", J!' ,,~~:.' '-'--- I \ . '. .... l~,,~ ~:.. 6 4 ;..-".// 17 Y"U;hICI\b~'<~~.I'~.ir .., .... '.) 'I...... .....,..5/ ~_..';..'-;-'. 4 '[. '/ 0 I' 1 E' 'v T ,. "';~."'<J.>\--;"'o,. ''-.'.' ." < .' . _ ...d.:: ~'. J',~"I ' ,:.: '. '\ '...., '''"''' , ,~ . ",.0<-;,"'..-.",,' LONG BEACH BA Y /, '"" '". \- I'u"! .,,, , ;G~''''''''':;- ", ", :"7;~'.,,:" , '_/::.:: ./ II .-t R nOR .)~. ;'". ,;.- .:.' ~,:. ,>~f<:.::' -"'l.';J. S:'\;: : ' . /-:_ _,~';:' \,-,/" .,1,,;/ '~...~\:~,..- _<7._;", '\:'-;?,"- . ..... :~k~ ~i;f" ,. ,. ;9 ,'''"",' (\;\.Y' ./~ . '{.:..~' :~:::""l<:')\ 't.?}~ .. '. ..."j_. .;;',~'" "'_ . '~....."....,,',".'....6\~ ~-- ~-~ -' ).-. \'_~':'.... ~ . _ ~ 1'~', " ,.' --"''''- '" -" '---',- " I, BtOw", 'Y:O"\~~''''''~;''.9' ,3 ...":..-.... ,'" --- ~ ;'.Pt, ./_~~~..':,..,..~ , 17 :' ~-- > ..,,~~'--. <.~:';'~\:F";~~~.........Pi/i.. /~~~~~ ',/l ( , '0 '-;;',':;.', )"';;'.3,.,,:,,:-/";,/ .....--B.n,~Pt// ;> P.....,.. N...-l/-:.'< ....--;....,; ". ( ,. ../ .. / ...- ,//D 'J n " ,. ~ u T H o L JJ <J 5l --.t:u----- JO 31 /--~~jO- ~--- '. " 4' " 3' ,< j:j: 3' ,. w ( i'J ~-------,. --------.----- ,. " " "J~'---- - -.. ,. \ '. FIGURE I SITE LOCATION MAl' FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. ~ . ~ i ~ ~ ,. J . I ~ . _f ..............- --- - -....- --- -- Qtl'1._". .o;T~ "'- - //1 , L- \ \ ST Ac'iDS OF LOW PI;\ir:S -., - , <.AI -....- --- .... - " ". '. , '.l J' I--...-j I . i _. -,,- -- --- -- / /- // '. ./ ./ / " ...... / J. Ii ~. --- .- /-'1 '. FIGURE 1 - - "'.liT~ ~ \10NOPOLE SITE PLAN lb., "",,-.. .) FARMLAND / / / -- ~ FREUDENTHAL & E:LKOWTTZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. -+ I ! .~ f . i 1 'i .I j 1 I ) Visual obstructions exist in the horizon in the area of the proposed monopole site. These obstructions consist of utility poles, overhead lines and buildings along Main Road, the surrounding roads and neighborhoods. Large street and yard trees also exist throughout the area. Insuection of Recentlv Constructed Monouole Site In order to ensure a comprehensive visual analysis, a recently constructed monopole site was inspected. This monopole site is located proximate to the northwest comer of Main Road (S.F. 25) and Elijah's Lane, hamlet of East Mattituck, Town of Southold. As indicated on Photograph No.2, the monopole "blends" with the utility poles, overhead lines and street trees along Elijah's Lane. It should be noted that the monopole site is approximately 150 feet from the photographer in Photograph NO.2. As indicated in Photograph Nos. 3,4 and 5, the presence of the monopole becomes less evident in the horizon. In Photograph No.3, the photographer is approximately 800 feet from the monopole site. Along with the houses. trees, utility poles and overhead lines, the monopole is visible, however, it is no more distinctive than the other utility poles. In Photograph No.4, the view is approximately 2,200 feet south of the monopole site. Farmland is in the foreground with vineyards and trees in the background. The monopole can be seen in the horizon above the tree line. Photograph No.5 is taken approximately 2,700 feet southeast of the monopole site. Farmland and snow fencing are present in the foreground with utility poles, overhead wires, and trees in the background. The monopole is no more distinct than the other utility poles. This photograph also indicates that the monopole becomes less visible in the horizon as distance therefrom increases. 5 or ~ il I ~ ~ t: I I , ~ , ~.. ~ .i t ~ J I . Photograph Nos. 6 and 7 depict the view of the monopole site from approximately 1,000 feet. It is clear from these pho!Ographs that when trees are present in the line of sight, even if the trees are not as tall as the monopole, the view of the monopole is obstructed. On the south side of Main Road just east of the intersection with Locust Avenue (Photograph No.6), one can see the monopole in the horizon along with the utility poles and the overhead lines. By moving just 20 feet further !O the east, the tree in the foreground obstructs the view of the monopole (Photograph No. 7). The utility poles and overhead lines are still visible in Photograph No.7. The visual analysis of the recently erected monopole indicates that the monopole is generally no more intrusive than utility poles and overhead lines. Furthennore, when trees are present in the line-of-sight, they act as an effective buffer to intrusions in the horizon. Also, as distance increases. [he monopole becomes less visually apparent. Line-of-Sie:ht Analvses from Proximate Areas Four general areas were chosen for the line-of-sight analyses (see Figure 3). These areas include: 1. The commercial, municipal, residential and fann uses along ylain Road. The area is situated generally from west to northeast of the subject site and represents the major view corridor. ~ Primarily residential area south of the subject site along Platt Road, Halyoke Avenue and East Orchard Street. 3. The predominantly agricultural and residential uses southwest of the subject pro perry . 6 j I ~ > i 'I ~ J u z - ,.\\ ~r,'ll~\:.\;J~\\ -"" I "'---__'.. ) ..w) - 'v I \1 ~, f'," \\'\\'\\\ \~ "".\+\~,..; 'V ,.,;;' "('! ',.... " ,,/,' . 1'1 ""'ji"" ".'", \0- \ ' ~\\\, , .... ') . ....... I J.~I , :I...~.....".. '-.: , i Jr\'"~ '~ .......\ ~~ ' \<.,,\. <.' """- ' ". 5,1 f' I!""i"'\" ~a: -- ";~I t. :t. \\"l41 I ",' , ";. '; '", ,. " '" < , """ ' : ",;, \, ~'. . 0 . , I, , ' " I i ~ ,0 ~ . I, \ P,\ } ,__ '. : ."~ ''''";' .." " ~'" /'\ I' "" \' <,; ~ 'n .' I r ~ (f <Q CQ ....c., ' ""\\'",,- ~O~',r, . ':'11<'1' OJ ',\ \ I' ~ ";'\\\ '--J~--;;f.~ ,\ . :\ "', i:I/i'J . \ \~ \~ \, I' \.~ .,.' j..~. \ .. i ,I~! " ~ .:t: ~ . ~ \ (\ ~ ;; ~) ) \ ;1. "/-~ ~:~,~:,-~'-" ~:f- ~'r2~~fl;( ~ ~ . \\:i I \ / I n ';.j'::" \ I "! 'jl I 1 ~ . Oil~\. " ," ',' -, '4" ~ I 'i. ~,I~ ';' ) f! ,f (r--;::=;-.,... ~ ';~~fr ~;\1, L;IJ' ~ ~ \ . G) :: '<. /C 'A. r ," iI;', '.., I',: ';;~:~ .~) ~ e,:,. ~ _ . ,I I - %// ,) .I"'"r r ", .' ,I. 'y ~_:?:; c ~ I a.. :(/':.Ct.l o-?~t'i/ '\'Ili r~f' I . r f, "'_'~,lLJo.. 0 ~:: ~ 1'0/, .,"'" );,/"1 ' ~'\~'" ",' I" "', ".. ,_ ~ I ;~~ ." ,.0;", "ti, ."(, ~W: I: ,: , ! . .;:':' .., I,-J ' .' ,~tJ i ,'z. "'b~~j.,f ;'1 ,"j'~ ..Ii" ..' I ( "'.., .........j, _ IQ .~~.....,._).~ 0'1". I {... Ir jAil .<,,'t:', ',I': ',' ." '. .....'""'...,'" ~"":)~-';"'/l-' "'" IJ :fl" ~:5 /;FIt I tlii ~71,' ~~~~0~i{-':'"~-'-'=-"'i;>O'W <> ~ .r/-;; ;~;fj\!i'~,,~ ....... 'I .'. \.. -OJ. f c,- R" 'J.,r\ I/~. II ..\ "". . ...-'f".. VA" _. <,'t-..<I, _._" ;C.. " ..),) I. ;, \.' '," ""'--" 7......,,, ::\ F'"I" (&:'" .", "~.,,, ,~I,\ ~I/" "(' ~ '/"'0' , . "3",,,, ~ - " ., , I / P' I : '.:l~.;:. I \ : \', L-C..,/....., . ", ',I. ,:.' .'o,~,~.....,._r~ Co /;~:':-..f- ",.f', /1. "I 'J', ,I, '-" '-, " , ,',. _,,-,-_ , r _. "_"I " .. " , ", ~'I '. , '. .... r:. 0., .1 ,: I I "'. z I. '" I t'. " "'\ t r., II "'. ::;f"'" I I, '-. , , . ."~,'_ ". "', .., I"'.., ii.. .11 '~;:;,-., ' ':"""'';'''.__ ~\\ "';";[' '~k-' .~_ . -; ~ i, I -,~, '." .. < ',I '''/ ''''j 1 .' ,', , 0" l~- . a. '" .' '~" "" t-".. '\, ~ f J",',', ,; '-;'":-1- .,:" l\ 0' I '.;- \ \\ '- , . .....; , ','^ ' '. It, t '. ',~' ; . _ ,:"" . i':~~"''' :"~-.:' ~. , . ;,~h'~~ / ~.i\t"\\..,},,,,{\,;,,:/ ' ''{~IJ ".01 '\ \ 'Jh'\, 'I . QO"'~~~- ". , ;\ :; \'\~\.~''''~';~/~'-'<''i ',' I~). ;7'\~' +""1',(, '-'I/".~-t)"';;.i' , ' \\ ':,~ $.....~ ! (.. ". .\'.' . 'I.' '.....i "', ., \ \ '.~ .:t'\l L-,.... ',. r {. ~~. . "', '" "i ' \\ \~'\~;-;; \ ,'. --c, "' ,0/' ,. " ," i>fr , . . '\' \, ~,. \..~' I -.,.... './ ~.off - 1 .'. .......~. ""..,j ,; ~ ',-, .. .. o. '. "'.!.. )j , '\' 'J ." \ ,,;, ~\:.,\ I; - 0 ,- '~" 0\'.. \Y /I/~. ".\\;2./ \ ~ :; ~<\;~\~\'~;~ ~;f';;:;~~~~'-A~~;.,. :i/ ~\\ ' '\ ~ ('.( '/ c~~ ... .p.r.. ';/ .;';' ___" ~ \, ~ - \ - \,. '-<r<3 0 :.\ 'I .'.. ~ .\o"'....,~..~~ .' ~ /1 , ~ . ~ \~ \"', . 'li'\"'2 /',',., .'..' .',:_ _" ......./ '" v' '...' .\,'\ 0)' "0'''0.,. ...::::-......__ . rin':~", '<~~, ',\, \ '~'\ 'd~" ,,'~ ':;:.>''''!3!'. :{:;.;\;;;?~':'1l' . ~ \. '\\~~~'"\~':'~z-r~D',, :/.i~"~'~~Y~'1I.:1Jt<;;:;, /:::"_~~' ~ \......... '\ "'-r,...,., - ""J. .. / ii, .' \Xl.. / .__ ~ \." "'~<'N, w^-' ~ J '. ,0 , .:~< ~j.:'/ . _, , \ "', ~.} . JC6,u - '. ~ \ \.\ -,\ 'T\';:~.~I""'/ rl'lfr,;:--; -t 0:<= _ ~'-g, \ I I . ~ \ ~~ I I' -...., .... _ 01 \ '.! 'b""\ I .~ I I - I J;! _ .. , I" V. "'\ ' / __ " I ,} i ~'. ",1"( ~ ') I I fr ,/ ~ : '/411 i 1':, lil,l,h'/ .:.--- ~ ~ 0 I ,":K.~ '~ r,~, " . I '\ ( Oil ~ '\\ '~~~~ '-rir)..,....;;~ . r I: U :: ~ . '~..'""'>/. \. (I. ~ ~--.: >-'[ ,.. " U I J ,I ~ l II, ~ ;,' :,. 1,. t ..~ r, \ 0-... 0 ~ J 1- .....::."",".'>-..1....".. ;\,,,,___~" ;;; ;" -............ "'-,:.:, ":'~:~(':. .....:p Oo.~ .....~ At '-........ .........., .." , ~" '. '"""'" ",'"", ,,,. " ~.,'...""\.ir.:. ;...;;.." ~ '" ....., ~ """. \ ~.... .. , ,\" :~\",....:,~'!o, ......~.::.~ _, ." .,,'.....1.'\ s o i:l:: o " 2; f-o .J ~ t;/l Z o u ~ , t::: ~ ::J ;:J o<l i i '" " / I / .J <: - - '"' ?; .... !"'I .... ::J ~ ::::: " - " . . ~ ~ ! i .........\ ~ \ o ., ~ (/J <: :;J ::::: ~ (/J - (/J >- , - ~ Z ~ , ~ '- :c '-' - (/J , ... .... .... ~ Z - , - ....... ~'"' , ~ ., ~ .. " "-' ~ . , . o ~ ..., I';l c::: ~ ..... r.; ~ ~ 01 ~) I rr . < , . ;~ ::::J:, 7 I !: . i ... 1; ;. ~! " The view from Narrow River Road which runs southeast, east and northeast of the subject site. These areas were selected because they represent those proximate to the site. In addition, they contain residential uses that are considered potential sensitive receptors. Before conducting the line-of-sight analyses, it should be understood that there are a variety of factors that influence visual impacts. These factors include, but are not limited to: the orientation of the receptor; the presence of rnanmade structures; the presence of mature trees; distance; and other obstructions in the horizon. , i , ; Area 1 - The area along ~'fain Road is the major view corridor and has mixed uses that include commercial, municipal, residential and agricultural. The majority of persons living. working and traveling along Main Road would not be expected to have an unobstructed view of the monopole as existing large street and yard trees along with buildings and structures would serve to block segments of the view. It should be noted that utility poles and overhead wires exist on both sides of Main Road in this area. Thus. the portion of the monopole that may be visible would be expected to blend with the existing obstructions in the horizon (see Photograph Nos. 1 and 8 through 10). These photographs were taken berween 900 and 4,000 feet from the proposed monopole site. i i j , l , Area 2 - The area directly to the south of the proposed monopole site is basically open farmland. Two residences and a farm complex exist just to the wesr of Plarr Road approximately 600 feet and 1,200 feet from the subject property while a single residence is situated in the farmland approximately 1,300 feet southwest of the site. These locations would likely have a view of the proposed monopole (Photograph No. 11). The monopole would appear in the disrance above the tree line in the horizon, similar [0 that in Photograph No.4. utility poles and overhead wires exisr along Platt Road. 8 , > ,. , >, r ~ I ( Residential homes also exist along the eastern portion of Orchard Street and around the intersection of Platt Road and Halyoke Avenue. These are approximately 1,800 to 2,400 feet from the proposed monopole site. Buildings and other structures, utility poles, overhead wires and trees exist in this area (see Photograph Nos. 12 and 13). While the top of the monopole would be visible between some of the existing trees and building roof lines. it would be no more obtrusive than the existing utility poles and overhead wires in the area and along Platt Road. Along the southern end of Platt Road, trees and tall marsh grass interrupt the view of the horizon (see Photograph Nos. 14 and 15) in the direction of the proposed monopole site. Area 3 - Area 3 is characterized by homes along the southwestern side of the western portion of Orchard Street. At the intersection of Orchard Street and Tabor Road are two farn] complexes and a cemetery just north of the intersection along Tabor. Farmland exists northeast of the western portion of Orchard Street and east of Tabor Road running north almost to ~ rain Road. A fairly unobstructed view exists over the farmland toward [he monopole location from the western portion of Orchard Street and the northern end of Tabor Road ('.vhich are approximately 2,200 feet and 2,000 feet away, respectively). The monopole would appear in the distant horizon above the tree line at these locations (see Photograph :-ios. 16 and 17). At the intersection of Orchard Street and Tabor Road, the farm buildings and structures obstruct the line-Df-sight toward the proposed monopole location. Utility poles and overhead wires are also visible (see Photograph No. 18). This area is about 2,300 feet sourhwest of the :nonopole site. Directly to the north of the farm building is a cemetery. Street trees border Tabor Road at this location which tend to interrupt the view of the horizon (see Photograph No. 19). 9 , t i ~ a . . . ..\rra .t - This area is situated along Narrow River Road which runs southeast, east and nonheast of the subject monopole location. The distance of the road from the monopole site varies from approximately 3,000 feet in the south to 4,200 feet in the northeast. Except for a marina and home along the southern portion of the road, the area is undeveloped. Marsh areas, farmland and woods are intermixed west of Narrow River Road. The trees and tall marsh grass tend to fragment the view of the horizon, ohsi ructing the direct line-of-sight of the monopole. In areas where farmland exists, the monopole would be able to be seen in .the distance above the cree line (see Photograph Nos. 20 through 22). Visual Resource Summaries and Assessment Fonns Pursuant to the Visual Resources Assessment Procedure for U.S. Annv COrDS of Emnneers The visual resource summaries and assessment forms are included in Appendix A. 10 , , . 1 f , I~: , , . CONCLuSIONS Based upon an inspection of the proposed monopole location; evaluation of the physical characteristics of the proposed monopole; analysis of potential areas of impact; line-of-sight analyses from proximate areas; visual resource summaries and assessment forms; and a review of a recently constructed monopole site. the following conclusions can be made: 1. The major transient view corridor in the vicinity of the proposed monopole site, Main Road, is lined in segments with mature trees that would serve as visual buffers to the proposed monopole. Structures in the line-of-sight would also help to obstruct the view. 1 Many persons residing proximate to the subject properry would not have an unobstructed view of the monopole. The presence of the monopole would be evident when looking from the south across farmland. J. The horizon proximate to the proposed monopole location is not "pristine." Utility poles and overhead lines are present in the horizon in many of the surrounding areas. The proposed monopole would blend with these existing utility poles in areas in which the monopole may be seen. 4. An evaluation conducted in an area where a monopole was recently erected in East Martituck indicates that mature trees act as an effective visual buffer. When trees and/or manmade structures are present in the line-of-sight, even if the trees are nor nearly as tall as the monopole, the view of the monopole is obstructed. Furthermore, the monopole becomes less visible in the horizon as distance therefrom increases. In addition, the monopole "blends" with obstructions in the horizon such as utility poles, overhead lines and trees. In fact, due to its grayish/blue color. it is often less evident than typical utility poles. 11 -,--- . ~ , 1 I ~ . i ; I -I PHOTOGRAPHS I I I I J I FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP. INC. ~ J - . . t , S t Photo!!l"aph No.1: View looking east along Main Road just west of Platt Road approximately 900 feet from the proposed monopole site. FREUDENTHAL &: ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. . i I ~ ~ ~ i I I I i .' , ~ " i f , ["""' I I I I I ! Photo!!J'aoh No.2: View of existing monopole recently constructed in East Mattituck. Note that the monopole "blends" with the overhead lines and street trees. I '---. I --_._.~ I I I , i I I I ! I I "1 I I I I I I ! rF FREUDENTHAL 3.: ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROl;P. [NC. f 'j I r-- 0 . I i I ! I I r I J ; I t . ~ I f , , " f , r [ t i I ! f ; . ! I I I . ; 1 t . ~ I . j i j ! I I " l!::_ " ~' , ...... .... , '. \" ._"~':"" Photol!raoh No.3: Photograph taken along Elijah's Lane approximately 800 feet nonh of the monopole. Ctility poles. overhead lines and the monopole are visihle in the horizon. The monopole is no more evident than the other utility poles. Photol!t",lilh ,'10.": View looking nonh from Suffolk A venue just west of its intersection with Locust A venue approximately 2.200 feet from the monopole in East \Iattituck. Farmland is in the foreground with vineyards and trees in the background. The monopole can be observed in the horizon above the tree line. = I ;;-REUDE~THAL .lc E:LKOWITZ CONSULTING GHOUl'. INC. ,Jj- lL , ~: -: i ; ~ < i , , , i , I l ~ , . ; ~ I , ~: ~ , ~ l , , f < i ~ , ~- I l i . ! i I , , ; i Photolrraoh No.5: View looking northwest from Suffolk A venue 500 feet east of Locust A venue approximately 2,700 feet from the monopole. Farmland and snow fencing are in the foreground with utility poles. overhead wires and trees in the background. The monopole is no more evident than a utility pole. \ Photolrraoh No.6: View looking west along Main Road just east of its intersection with Locust A venue approximately 1,000 feet from the monopole in East Mattituck. The road, utility poles. overhead wires and trees are in the foreground with houses. utility poles. overhead wires and trees in the background. The monopole blends with the utility poles, overhead wires and trees, F"REUDENTH.\L & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP. INC_ ! I. ! g , l ! I I . i I I I I I I I I i I I i I I 1 ~ r I . , ~ i ! , j l . I ,- , Photo!rraoh No. 7: The same view as in Photograph No. 6 except the photographer is approximately 20 feet further to the east on :'Iain Road. The tree in the foreground blocks the view of the monopole. .......----.... .'. ",::.~~ - ,;.. ~-> -:-"." Photo!!T":!oh No. S: View from Main Road looking east approximately ~.OOO feet from the subject site. Street and yard trees as well as utility poles and overhead wires are evident on both sides of the road. ~ FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP. INC. I ! r t i , i . l , ~ I I I f ; I [ ! Photo!rraoh No.9: View looking east from just west of Tabor Road. The subject site is approximately 2.000 feet away. Municipal buildings and trees obstruct the line-of-sight toward the proposed monopole location. Utility poles and power lines are also visible along the roadway. ~~'-"''''.- .', .o:i>'.' ".' ',C. __.-. ;':.Ji';~~~' ". - ~.' ~r':' - . ......'l. ""',-,'.1. ....".,-,-.'.-_..~ --- --- --.'- i i, , , i . . i r ~ i , ( I . ~ i ! i I I Photol!raoh No. 10: View looking southwest along Main Road about 3.000 feet from the subject property. The road. utility poles, overhead wires and fann fields are in the foreground while trees and buildings are in the background. The monopole would be able to be seen in the horizon but would blend with the trees. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC, I .--, '~~:'~. ~'-4-, ';yy.. ~~".,:-. '~:':!'l: ~.'.. , .;, .:,~~. I ,.,'. lk ! I I I ! Photo!!r<Joh No. II: F<Jnnl<lnd directly south of the proposed monopole site. The monopole would he expected to <Jppe<Jr in the horizon <Jhove the tree line. Photo!!raoh No. 12: View looking north <Jlong Platt Road from its intersection with Halyoke A venue which is approximately 2.000 feet south of the monopole site. Trees. hedges <Jnd buildings obstruct the line-of-sight toward the proposed monopole location. Power lines and utility poles are also visible in the area. FREUDE:-ITHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTl:-iG GROU? INC. , . i ~ , ! i i . I I I I I I I I ~ I [' L I ~- I i i ~~~_.......J;.... Photo!!raoh :"In. lJ: View looking north toward the monopole I'Katinn from approximately 2.200 feet away. Buildings and lree~ uh~lruct the line-of-si;.:ht toward the proposed monopole In~'ation. Photo!!raoh No. I~: Trees adjacent to the southern end of Platt Road tend to interrupt the view of the horizon. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWTTZ CONSULTING GROUP. [NC. . 1-' r-- i l Photo!!Taoh :\'0. 15: Tall marsh grass along the southern portion of Platt Road which interrupts the view of the horizon in the dire1:tion of the monopole site. '~7"<-';""" ~. . ......S.........4. "'''.-:00. l::.~.___' -. '" ~--;.;.;...... .-._;0..:-.. I I 1 r , Photo!!Taoh :\'0. 16: View looking northeast toward the monopole location from approximately 2.200 feet away on the western portion of Orchard Street. The monopole would appear faintly in the horizon above the tree line. I , F'REUDE"TI!AL Jc ELKOWITZ CONSULTI"C GROliP. INC. i r- I I I i I 1- L PhotolITaoh :'>io. 17: View looking east toward the monopole site from approximately 2.000 feet away on Tabor Road. The monopole would appear above the tree line in the horizon. , I I I I i , I I I I fF PhOlolITaoh :'>io. 18: View looking northeast toward the monopole location from approximately 2.300 feet away. Fann buildings and structures obstruct the line of site toward the monopole location. Power lines and utility poles are also visible. F'REUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP. INC. d I I ~ Photoeraoh No. 19: View looking easterly from the cemetery toward the monopole location approximately 2.100 feet away. Trees interfere with the line-of-sight toward the proposed monopole location. I , i I I rF Photoeraoh No. 20: View looking northwest toward the monopole location from approximately 3.000 feet away on the southern portion of :'iarrow River Road. Trees and tall marsh grass tend to fragment the line-of-sight toward the monopole L____ location. r'REUDENTIIAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP. INC. I ,- lL, I I I i Photol!raoh :-.10. 21: Typical view looking northwest off :-.Iarrow River Road toward the monopole site. The monopole would appear in the horizon aho\'e the tree line. Photoeraoh :-.10. 22: Typical view from the central portion of Narrow River Road looking westerly toward the monopole location approximately 3.200 feet away. Trees obstruct and fragment the line-of-sight toward the monopole. FREUDENTHAL & EU<OWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. APPENDIX A iF FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP. INC. vrSUAL RESOURCE SUMMARY/DESCRIPTION FORM 1 MCS VIA SIMILARITY ZONE ( > BASIC (x) DETAILED ( ) INVENTORY (x> FORECASTING ( > PROJECT NAME Orient Monopole Site LOCATION South of Main Road VEWPOINTl) ZONE (K) .\ rea 1 wml PUH () WTlllOIJT PUH (X I PROJECT DETAILS AND COMMENTS DATE 12/6/96 TIME 12:00 noon WEA THER Overcast PERSONNEL riME PERIOD 0 YEARS I-Day In your own word3. de3cribe the visual resource of the tone. In doinQ so. try to describe t'" elements tt'lat Untty tn. u.. so that it can be con$ldarad a lone. MaKe note of orn.r aestnetic cnaracta"StlC3 that are present. Area 1 - Along Main Road both west and east of the monopole location. Foreground: Commercial, munitipal and residential buildings, utility poles, overhead wires and street trees. Midground: Same as foreground with farmland intermixed. Background: Large street and yard trees, the tops of buildings, utility poles and overhead wires. Vegetation: Street and yard trees along with grass lawns. ~ildlife: ~one oeserved. Water Resources: Absent. Structures: Commercial, municipal and residential buildings, uti:ity poles, and overhead wires. )loise: Minimal. Activities: Moderate traffic. AJ < -J.~ VISUAL RESOURCE INVENTORY/FORECAST FORM 2 MCS VIA SIMILARITY ZONE ( ) B AS I C ( Xi DETAILED ( ) PROJECT NAME Orient Monopole Site LOCATION South of Main Road VIEWPOINT ZONE (]O Area 1 WITH PLAlI WITHOUT PLAN (X) PROJECT DETAILS AND COMMENTS I>NENTORY (X) FORECASTING ( ) DATE 12/6/96 12:00 noon TIME WEA THER Overcast PERSONNEL 01 TIME PERIOD 0 YEARS l-Day WA. iER None RESOURCE SiR E A M RIVER LAKE/RES. V.ETLANDS MARINE MOVEMENT NONE MEANDER SWIFT RAPID FALLS SC'LE SMALL "1EDIUM LARGE LANDFORM ~Sl ROLLING TYPE COASTAL HILlS HILLS MOUNTAINS ~ VEGETATION COVER D ~ ~5-S0'\ SO-TS~ T5-tOO~ DIVERSITY NONE LITTLE ) PRESENT SUBST AN. EXTENSIVE S =~ S CHANGE NONE PRESENT SuaSTANilAL ~ANO/WAiEM USe: INTENSITY WILDERNESS UNDEVEL. TV=E .RECREA.. c-G1lTC.; - ~ L -2..; S iO:: N...J"? SUBURBAN ceo M M E .:i--::' URBAN INOUST'. ..\CCESS -V:::I= I . . _ I::tAIL WALK'..."AY SECOND. RD.EMARY~ HIGHWAV USER ACTIVITY C:,:;'i=1EE F ~:: 'J U E .'~ C y LOW lOW ( "<LED~~~ C~~~ HIGH HIGH lITT=R/POllUTION AMOUNT NONE .~ - - ._--......\ ,PRESENT) '-.. --- EXTENSIVE AOJ~CENT SCENERY SIMILARITY NOT .--------.. (~OMEWHA.I-) VERY SOUNDS ?=::SENCE iY?= ABSENT DISCORDANT C~R E S F Ni::> "::::::LNCONSPICUOU~ _.- ..-/ DOMINANT HARMONIOUS SME~LS P=i:::S::NC~ TY,::!=- ~ DISCORDANT PRESt::NT INCONSPICUOUS OO,I...tINANi HARMONIOUS VISIBILITY AMOUNT POSITION SCREENED INF=R'IOA ~-~ liO A 1.4 A L') 1___ ' PANOAA,1,,1':' SUPERIOR 00.' !n13 .1(.01 conl.,.n .Iny olh.r UQnrlIC.J.nl .ltr'OVI.:r? If '1'&3. ..1.01"1" In CornmanlS &00... Y" ~o, C:--o ; ~~- S IS 1M,s ~r&~ "'nown tor lis wIldlll, OOs.r."llon? Yo, OO&S tn,s .r.. COntilln &ny culrural or I'I'SIO('cal lanom,rlls? Y., ..<4 1_ ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FORM 3 MCS PROFESSIONAL ( ) STUDY AREA COMPOSITE ( ) NOTES: Orient Monopole Site Area I DATE 12/6/96 PERSONNEL DISTINCT AVERAGE MINIMAL WATER RESOURCES None Nearly Flat LANDFORM I Street and yard I trees, grass- IEGETATION landscaped and farm fields I LANDUSE . C01llll1ercial some municipal, residential and agricultural ~oderate traffic USER ACTIVITY Are there any federal!:!'1'alellOCal (institutional) oolicies tnat (3irectly affect t"e visual and ae:sthellC resourcss at the area? II so list tnem below. No Note any Imoortant tec:'lnical recognition in tne area. i.e. imcortant scenic areas otten us eO tor literary/artistiC ;Jurooses. "",Ialite l'IaOitat. arChaeo.lo91cal site. etc. None Note Jtner lmoortant Issues concer~.'Ilng aeSthetiC resources tnat yOu think will alfeet Ine assessment. ~one , .. AS .ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FORM 4 MCS STUDY AREA Orient Honopole Site DATE 1216/96 ZONE .. .~rea 1 PERSONNEL NOTES: DISTINCT AVERAGE MINIMAL COMMENTS 3 2 1 WATER RESOURCES I 0 LANDFORM I 1 I 2 VEGETATION UNDUSE I 2 USER ACTIVITY I 1 SP:CIAL 2 CONSIDER)' nONS' 6 2 0 TOT).LS TOTAL ASSESSMENT VALUE 8 .i~e followlnq will give you the value tor Special Considerations. A sum of J elf more .jistlnc:. 1-2 average. and 0 minimal. Ye, 1 NO a Does tnls :one contain any Cultural or Historical Landmarks? o IS tl'11S :one. or areas within it. I(nown tor ItS distinct visual Quality and/or 'Nildlite Observation? o is this :One tree trom collution and litter? 1 ~re there other aesthetic elements that add to thiS resource? To tal 1 2 A6 .. MANAGEMENT CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY FORM 5 MCS - STUDY AREA Orient ~[onopole Site Area l DA TE 12/6/96 PERSONNEL TES: MANAGEMENT CI..ASS TOTAL ASSESSMENT VALUE Preservation Retention Partial Retencion Moditica tlon R ei'labilita tion 17 and above 1.-18 "-'3 ~ T and below ZONE ~ CI..ASSIFICATION COMMENTS Area 1 Hodification A7 VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT FORM 6 VIA BASIC (X) PROJECT NAME Orient Olonopole Site LOC A TION South of Main Road VIEWPOINT MAP REFERENCE Area 1 A L TERNA T1VE ( ) PROJECT DETAILS AND COMMENTS DETAILED ( ) DATE 12/6/96 TIME WEA THER PERSONNEL 12:00 noon Overcast ot USE THE LETTER' A' FOR WITH PLAN CONDITION. . ~ '" w -~" - -. o c.5:- ...ol_ J " N U :Ii". (J - ~- Q; e; - o E .. w - a.E_ U -~.. _ 0 _ Cl ..J W -eoo eo. ...; Q 'tf.~ c:: < OG).z W S2: -< J:lI I.. < < , 00 - ~ w 0.., ..J .. ;: G()O - "- ~ w I - < _0 < :> I I !:: Of.J~~ U ~~cn ~euQ COMMENTS < ::: " u '" . 0.. e- o" .,= ,. . l-.!. e .... '" < c:: .... w U Z < USE THE LETTER 'e' FOR WITHOUT PLAN CONDITION ! z - _ - e ~ :; . .... c.l - - .... :n " WATER RESOURCES None A/B 0 C OlI S A/3 0 C OlO C .\IB () SC MO C I MR i 0 SC MO DS A/B 0 SC MI S LANDFORM VEGETATION LANDUSE USER ACTIVITY SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS. ! INCONSPICUOUS SIGNIFICA.NT ~CfOMINENT LANDSCAP: COMPOSITION WITH PLAN WITHOUT PLAN I x x . The tallowlng will give you the value tor Soeclal ConSlder3tlons. A sum 01 ~ or more distInct, 1-2 average, and 0 .'T'llnlmal. Yes No 1 0 Does thIS tone contain any Cultural or Historical Landmarks'? A/B Is fl"llS :one, or areas within it. \tno.....n tor ItS distinct visual Quality and/or wtlchle observatron? A/B Is thiS zone ~ree Irom iJolIUIlOn .1nd litter? A/B ).re there otner aes::'l;etlC elements lha! add to rhls resoufcc!'? A B To tal 2 o A8 VISUAL RESOURCE SUMMARY IDESCRIPTION FORM 1 MCS VIA SIMilARITY ZONE ( ) BASIC ().) DETAILED ( ) INVENTORY CO FORECASTING ( ) PROJECT NAME Orient Monopole Site LOCATION South of ~[ain Road VEwPown) ZONEeXl Area 2 'NmI1'UH e) WITHOUT I'UH ( ) PROJECT DETAILS AND COMMENTS DATE 12/6/96 TIME 12:30 p.m. WEA THER Overcast PERSONNEL TIME PERIOD 0 YEARS I-Day In your own word3. describe the visual rssource at tl'le ::on.. In dOlnQ so. try to C!eSCrlbe the al.menu tn.t unity tn. ~re. so lnat it can O. considered oi ton.. Make note of other aeSthetic cnaracte(l3t1C$ that are .oresenf. Area 2 - South of ~[ain Road around eastern Orchard Street and around the intersection of Platt Road and Halyoke Avenue. Foreground - Municipal streets, homes, farm buildings, utility poles, overhead wires, street trees and farm fields. Nidground - Farm fields. Background - Trees 0n the horizon. Vegetation - SCreet trees, landscaped areas, farm fields, and marsh plants. Wildlife - ~one observed. Wa~er Resources - Absent. Structures - Residential homes, farm buildings, utiltiy poles and overhead wires. Noise - Ninimal. Activities - Light traffic. A3 VISUAL RESOURCE INVENTORY/FORECAST Mc;s VIA FORM 2 'SIMILARITY ::ONE ( ) 6 ASI(: ex} DETAILED ( ) ?RO.;::C1 NA,1.1=: ~OCA TION VIEWPOINT INVENTORY (X) FORECASTING ( ) OAT=: TiME ZONE ( ) WEA THER PERSONNEL " WITH PLAN ( WITHOUT PLAN ( ) PROJECT DET ~'LS AND COMMENTS TIME ?':RIOO YEARS WATER None RESOURCE STREAM R!V=_~ LAK:/RES. ~'ETLANDS MAHINE MOVEMENT NONE ME),NOEt=l S'NIFT RAPID FA LL:i S C A LE SMAL!.. .l.tE:lIUM LARGE LANDFORM ~-...... ROLLING TYPE CQAST..\L e~/ HIL'_S HILLS MOUNTAINS VEGETATION U2:~ COV:R 0 o-:!s~ 25-50% 7S-'OD':I. DIVERSITY NON: (CTTT :.-= ) PR:SENT SUBSTAN. EXT:NSIVE S:AS CHANGE NONE ?RES:NT SUBSTANTIAL LAND/WArEn USE ~~ INi;::NSITV WILDE.~NESS SUBURBAN URBAN TY?: REC;1:AT. C~i1ESrO€V COMME~. INOUST. ACCESS ~ TY?:: iRAIL W A L K ',',' A Y ,SE,COND. RD;JPRIMARY RD. HIGHWAY .......--. - USER ACTIVITY O::GREE ~) F ::; =: :: U :: N C Y (--!::EJ:J,) ME: IUM ME:>rUM HIGH HIGH LITTER/POL:"UTION .-------... (~ AMCUNT ?~ESENT =XT::.~SIV= ADJACENT SCENERY SIMILAi=lITY NOT SOUNDS ~W~ VERY PRESENC: TY?~ ~SE~) DISCORDANT DOMINANT HARMONIOUS PRESENT INCONSPICUOUS SMELLS b:~ DISCORDANT DOMINANT HARMONIOUS PRESENCE TY?=: ?RESENi INCONSPICUOUS VISIBILITY ----~ ~ L.p':'i=iTIALlY SCR==NEO ) NO~MAL AMOUN7 POSITION SCRE:NED INFERIOR PANORAMA SUPE=-rOR Ooe" (",s "'rlllil contJllt\ ,Jny all1.r SIQnrllcant .rtrl0ullll'? It y.~, lII.'lplilln In Comm,nlS ,JOa..... G Q G v" \:1 tn" ar.,J II.nown lor It~ ...ldtll. 00,.r"..llon1 h, Oo.s IMrs .r..... ;:onlilrn any ;:uHur.. or ~rs'orlc.l1 l.lndtnilrlt.s1 v" A4 ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FORM 3 MCS PROFESSIONAL ( ) COMPOSITE ( ) '3TUOY AREA Orient )1onopole Site NOTES: Area 2 DATE 12/6/96 PERSONNEL DISTiNCT AVERAGE MINIMAL WATER RESOURCES I None LANDFORM Nearly Flat Street and yard trees, grass- IEGETATlON landscaped and farm fields Residential and agricultural LANDUSE , I Light traffic USER ACTIVITY I ~(e there any /ederall3"'t3ta/local Onstlrutional> calleies Inat directly affect the vIsual ane: aestnerlC resources 01 tne area? If so list Ihem below. No ;'Jote any rmcortant tect"lnical recognitlcn in the area, i.e. imoortant scenIC areas otten useo for lIterary/artIstic cur:loses. wildlife habifat. archaeologIcal site. etc. None No!e other Imoortant Issues concern!n; aesthetic resources tnat you Inlnk will attect the assessment. ~one ~.~ ~. AS - P\SSESSMENT SUMMARY FORM 4 MCS ZONE ... NOTES: Area 2 DATE PERSONNEL 12/6/96 STUDY AREA Orient Honopole Site DISTINCT AVERAGE MINIMAL COMMENTS 3 2 1 WATER RESOURCES I 0 LANDFORM I 1 VEGETATION I 2 LANDUSE I I 2 I 1 USER ACTIVITY I I i SPECIAL I 2 CONSIDERA TIONS. I I 6 2 0 TOTALS TOTAL ASSESSMENT VALUE 8 . The tollowlng 'Nill give you rl"le value lor Scecial Considerations. A sum of 3::;( :nore dIstinct. 1 -2 average. and a minimal. y.s , NO ~ [s tl1.s zone. or. areas within it, known tor its distinct visual Cluality and/or wildlife observation? o o Does tnlS tone contain any Cultural or Hi3torical Landmarks? Is tnis zone free trom pOllution and Jitter? 1 1 ),re Inere otner aesthetic elements tnat add to rnis resource" Total 2 A6 Jl - MANAGEMENT CLASS/FICA TION SUMMARY FORM 5 MCS STUDY AREA Orienc Honopole Sice Area 2 DATE 12/6/96 PERSONNEL TES: MANAGEMENT CLASS TOTAL ASSESSMENT VALUE Preservation R a tentlon Partial Retention Modification Renabilitation 17 and above 14-16 l' - 1 J --::a:.- 1 0 ") 7 ai"'-d below ZONE # CLASSIFICATION COMMENTS .\rea :2 Hodificacion 1 A7 VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT FORM 6 VIA BASIC (X) PROJECT NAME Orient Monopole Site LO CATION South of Main Road VIEWPOINT MAP REF:MENCE Area 2 ALTERNATIVE ( ) PROJECT DETAILS AND COMMENTS DETAILED ( ) DATE 12/6/96 TIME 12:30 p.m. WEA THEM Overcast PERSONNEL 01 N W -1=.1) ~ -. o <:,S- '" U iii..u - .- Q;e; - o e . . I- W Z - Q.e- u _'0.. _ 0 < U '" -J w )000500 < 0 . ~ Q '0- < Q I e ;: < < :: -< alD:;: UJi~: _ ':I 0 Q c: :! w 0..0 -J " ~~uo I- W ~ ... :! < _0 < '" > :: OtJ~~ U:I:IlrJ i7;ftOQ COMMENTS C < :! :J U '" WATER RESOURCES ! LANDFORM I A/B 0 C MI S V!OGETATION I A/B I 'J SC MO C LANDUSE I A/B I 0 SC MO C USER ACTIVITY I I A/B 0 SC MO DS SPECIAL 1MB I CONSIDERATIONS' 0 SC MI S USE THE L:TTER 'A' FOR WITH PLAN CONDITION. USE THE LETTER'S' FOR WITHOUT PLAN CONDITION . = . :..! . " 0= ,. -;, =~ ~ E ~ w u z < ; -c ~ ; . I- '" < c: - INane I I I I I I INCONSPICUOUS SIGNIFICANT ~AOMINe.'H LANDSCAPE COMPOSITION WITH PLAN WITHOUT PLANI x X . The follOWing will give you tl'le value tor Soeclal COnSlC]eratlOns. ~ sum at ~ or more distlncl. 1-2 average. and 0 minimal. Yes No 1 0 Does trll$ zone contain any Cultural or HistorIcal Lanamarks? A/B Is this zone. or areas wltl'lin it, known lor its distinct visual A/B C1uatily and/or wlialite ooservatlon? IS tt'lrs lone 'ree from Oollution ana litler? A/B A Are tt'lere orner aesthetic elements tnar acd to InlS resource? B o TOfal 2 ~ i ~, A8 VISUAL RESOURCE SUMMARY IDESCRIP1l0N FORM 1 MCS VIA SIMILARITY ZONE ( ) BASIC (X) DETAILED ( ) INVENTORY CO FORECASTING ( ) PROJEC7 ,~AME Orient Monopole Site !.OCATlON South of Main Road VIEWPOINT'( :zaE ( ~ Ar ea 3 wn1f IUH (I Wll1<<lCJT IUH ( Xl P'lOJECT DET AILS ANO COMMENTS OATE 12/6/96 TIME 1:00 p.m. WEATHER Overcast PERSONNEL TIME PERIOO 0 V!:ARS - 1 Day In your own word3. describe Ine visual fesourea of tho 1:0no. In doinO so. try to descrtb. rne elemonts mat unity the area so that It can o. conSI(~.r.d .J. :ono. Make no to of otner aestnetic cnaraetonstlc", that ue prosent. Area 3 - Southwestern portion of Orchard Street, the intersection of Orchard Street and Tabor Road and North along Tabor Road. Foreground - Municipal streets, homes, farm buildings, utility poles, overhead wires, street Crees and farm fields. Midground - Farm fields. Backg~ound - Trees on the horizon. Vegetation - Street trees, landscaped area, and farm fields. Wildloce - None observed. Watar Resources - Absent. S:ructures - Residential ho~es, farm buildings and structures, utility poles, and overhead w~res. Noise - Minimal. Activities - Light traffic. A3 VISUAL RESOURCE INVENTORY/FORECAST FORM 2 MCS VIA SIMII..ARITY ::ONE ( ) B AS I C (xl DETAILED ( ) PROJECT NAME Orient Monopole Site LOCATION South or Main Road VIEWPOINT () ZONE (Xl WITH PLAN () WITHOUT PLAN (X) PROJECT DETAILS AND COMMENTS tfNEHTQRY (X) FORECASTING OAT: 12/6/96 TIME 1 :00 p.m. WE.THER Overcas t PERSONNEL .f TIME PERIOD 0 YEARS I-Day None WATER RESOURCE S TR E A M RIVEA LAKE/RES. V'ETLANDS MARINE MOVEMENT NONE MEANDER SWIFT ;'lA PID FALLS SCALE SMALL MEDIUM LARGE LANDFORM c:=;) ROLLING TYP: COASTAL HILLS HILLS MOUNTAINS -------- VEGETATION COVER DIVERSITY S"AS CHANGe o NONE: NONE 0-2S'(, c;=.:rTi L ~ 25-50~ PRESENT PRESENT ~I SU~~ I A,.N':' 75-'00'(, EXTENSIVE SUBSi~NTrAL LAND/WATER INi2NSITY TYP~ USE ~----.. ___________. WILDERNESS~~~y.et...- 'LRU~J..... RECi=t=:AT. AGMIC~ J /"RESIC:NT.) -- ....... SUBURBAN ::JMME~. UFlSAN INOUSi. ACCESS TYPE TRAIL ---~ WALK 'N A Y isEee ~ID. RD.' ~qr.l""A.RY RO. !-iIGHW A Y -",,-:"--_.- USER ACTIVITY ~ DEGRE" ~. FRE.:JUENCY ~ LITTER/POL~UTION AMOUNT ~i ADJACENT SCENERY SIMILARITY NOT MEDIUM MEDIUM HIGH HIGH PRESENT ::XiENSIVE SOUNDS PRESENC" TYP~ ~.~ - - '1~RY ~) DISCORDANT PRESENT INCONSPICUOUS DOMINANT HARMONIOUS SMELLS PRESENCE TY?:: ~l --- DISCORDANT PRESENT INCONSPICUOUS DOMINANT HARMONIOUS VISIBILITY A ,1...10 UNT POSITION SCREENED INFERIOR .- --------- PARTlA LL Y SCRE"NED ) NORMAL PANORAMA SUPERIOR Ooe.s ll'li~ ,are", conrain any oUter ~IQndIC,Jnl .altrIOu'e37 II '1"..1, ."'0I.,1In In Comm.rus .J.Qove. Yu ~i Y.. I::J Yu ~ Is Il'HS ;lr..J. k.nown ror 11.1 ""'lldIU. 00S.""""lon1 Does thiS ....~ eonf"'ln any cullura' 0" i''lfSfOfleal lanomcrk.,7 A4 .ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FORM 3 MCS PROFESSIONAL ( ) COMPOSITE { } '3TUDY AREA Orient Monopole Site NOTES: Area 3 DATE 12/6/96 PERSONNEL DISTINCT AVERAGE MINIMAL WATER RESOURCeS I None Nearly flat LANDFORM Street and yard trees, grass- 'EGETATlO~l landscaped and farm fields Residential Agricultural LANDUSE Light traffic USER ACTIVITY ~re there any lederal/!"tatellocal (institutional) oollcie~ rn3t directly affect Ine 'Ilsual and aesrnellC resourclts at (Me area? II so list Inem oelow. No ,\Iole any imoortant tecMnical recognition in tl'le area. I.e. Imoortant scenic areas otten useo tar lirerary/artistlc curooses. wlldlite haoltat. arcnaeo.lo~lcal sire. etc. ~one NOle <JtMer imoortant Issues concerning Jestheflc resources that you think will altect the assessment. ~one A5 'ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FORM 4 MCS ZO N E .. Area 3 DA TE l2/6/96 PERSONNEL STUDY AREA Orient Monopole Site NOTES: TOTAL ASSESSMENT VALUE 8 -The lollowlng will give you the value for Soecial Considerations. A sum at J or mor! aistlnct. 1-2 average. and 0 minImal. Yes No 1 0 Does U'IIS zone contain any Cultural or Historical Landmarks? 0 Is (rUS :.one, or areas within it, \c:nown tor its distInct visual 0 Quality and/or wildlife observation? 1 Is trlls lone tree trom pOllution and litter? ...re there other aesthetic elements that add fa this resource? 1 Total 2 A6 ". MANAGEMENT CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY FORM 5 MCS - STUDY AREA Orient Monopole Site DATE 12/6/96 PERSONNEL TES: - MANAGEMENT CLASS TOTAL ASSESSMENT VALUE Preservation Retention Partial Retention MOdification R ahabilita tic" 11 and above 1~-1S 11 - 1 J ..:.-::=-8 - 1 O-=...> 7 and below ZONE ~ CLASSIFICATION COMMENTS Area 3 Modification A7 , I i ilk. I -, - VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT FORM 6 VIA BASIC (X) PROJECT NAME Orient Monopole Site LOCATION South of Main Road VIEWPOINT MAP REFERENCE Area 3 ALTERNATIVE ( ) PROJECT DETAILS AND COMMENTS DETAILED ( ) DATE 12/6/96 TIME 1:00 p.m. WEA THER Overcast PERSONNEL 01 USE THE LETTER' A' FOR WITH PLAN CONDITION. . ~ w <.J Z < . ~. E - .~ <J:: )- -:. l-..!.s USE THE LETTER 'e" FOR WITHOUT PLAN CONDITION .... <Jl < a: .... :: -= i ~; : w , -~.. y -' o 5~~ '" -'-I~ '" <.J ;j;.u - .- o ~ =. - - o ~ ~ ~ _ .0 .... w - - a.E_ <:l ...l W """EoQ U '= Q. ~ 0 '='- <.J <..:a I E =: < < a: -< Q~::: w i2: , . . - :1 W "-<J .... .. ~~UQ .... ~ :1 w "" < _0 < "' - !!: OCJ~~ > t)~2~ a. ~(J Q 0 < :1 0 <.J - <Jl <Jl WATER RESOURCES I I LANDFORM I A/B I 0 C MI S VEGETATION IA/8 I 0 SC MO C LANDUSE 1MB I 0 SC MO C USER ACTIVITY I A/B I 0 SC MO DS SPECIAL. I CONSIDERATIONS. IA/B 0 SC MI S COMMENTS I None I I I I I I INCONSPICUOUS SIGNIFICAN":" ! PROMINENT L.ANDSCAPE COMPOSITION WITH PLAN x WITHOUT PLAN I X . ihe tollowlng will give you rne IIalue tor Soecial Consloeratlons. A sum at ,:j or more distInct. 1-2 average. and a minImal. Yes 1 NO o A/B A/B ':>oes tn,s zone contain any Cultural or Historical Landmarks? Is tnls :one, or areas within it. known tor ifs diSlinc:t visual qualify and/or WIldlife ocservatlon" Is It'llS ::one tree from oollution ana litter? A!B A B Are lnere orner al!slhetlc elemenlS that :ldd to thl~ r~sourc~? Tocal 2 o A8 i . I 6i VISUAL RESOURCE SUMMARY /DESCRIPTlON MCS VIA FORM 1 SIMILARITY ZONE ( ) BASIC (:<) DETAILED ( ) INVENTORY (X) FORECASTING ( ) ~ROJECT NAME Orient olonopole Site LCCATlON South of l1ain Road 12/6/96 1: 30 p.m. DATE TIME VEWPOINT'l ) 2IJtE (XI ..\.rea 4 WEA THER Overcast ~EASONNEL WTnI FUN (J wmtOI1T FUN ( Xl ~ROJECT DETAILS AND COMMENTS TIME FlERIOO 0 YEARS I-Day In your own W'ord~. describe the "isual resouree of the tone. In dOin9 so. try to deseribe the elemenu that unify tn. ir.. so that 11 can be conSidered il tone. MaKe not. ot otfter aesthetic cflar..cten.:llle.s that are ,resant. Area 4 - Along Nar,ow Rive, Road which runs southeast, east and northeast of of the subject monopole location. Foreground - Municipal st~eetsJ woods, farmland and marshes. Midground - Woods, farmland, marshes and buildings (residential and farm). Background - Trees on the horizon. Vegetation - WOOd5, farmland and marshes. Water Rdsources - ~arshes; no standing water. Structures - Reside~tial and farm buildings. Noise - ~finimal. Activities - Light traffic. A3 . V,ISUAL RESOURCE INVENTORY/FORECAST SIMILARITY ZONE ( ) B AS I C P. DETAILED ( ) PROJECT NAME Orient :1onopole Site LOC'" TION South of Hain Road VI~WPOINT ZONE (xl Area 4 WITH PLAN WITHOUT PLAN CO PROJECT DETAILS AND COMMENTS INVENTO R Y Q<) FORECASTING ( ) [2/6/96 [:30 p.m. OATE TIME WEA THER ?=RSONNEL Overcast FORM 2 MCS VIA ,f TIME ?=RIOD 0 Y=ARS i-Day W A TE R R=SOURCE MOVEMENT S C A LE LANDFORM TY?: VEGETATION COVER DIV=RSITY SEAS CHANGE LANe/WATER IN7:NSITY .....,.:>= , . , - ACCESS TY?E STREAM NONE SMALL RIVE':l MEANDER ~ ~) ~ o NONE NONE 0-25% L.ITTL: USE WILDERNESS ~: RECREAT. (:GRIC": LAKE/RES. SWIFT MEDIUM ~ RAPID ROLLING HILLS HILLS 25-S0Gft c- ?qESENJ__) PRESENT 50-75'(, SUBST AN. ~~ '~S.I.9=NJ\'. SUBUR9AN COMME.=I. TRAIL WALKWAY ~-ONO. ......... RD. ?RIMARY RD. HIGHWAY --- USER ACTIVITY OECi.:1EE ~j /' . FREOUENCY I~ L fiT E RIP 0 L L U l~ AMOUNT \~ONE ) ADJACENT SC=NERY SIMILARI,Y NOT SOUNDS P.RESENCE TY?: SMELLS PRESENCE TY?: VISIBILITY AMOUNT POSITION ~ DISCCi'lDANT (...---, ABSEN":/ DISCO.RDANT SCREENED INFERIOR ME D IU M ,,-.i!:DrUM PRESENT ~~ <.. ~MEWHAT' PRESENT INCONSPICUOUS ~AESENT INCONSPICUOUS ;~,;TIALLY ~~~E~~' NOR""'"l.. DtlO'~ IMIS <If.. cO"lall' Jony :Hh.t s,ondlC.lnt .rrt'Oules7 !f VIS. laOlalft In CommanlS aco.,.. Is tn,s ar..a ..nowlt for Irs ..Idlll. OCs.r.,allon1 v., v.s OOIllS II'\IS .r.a c::Jnlaln IIny cultural :::If rtlS{OrlCal lanCStnarlt]? ~. Yo, A4 MARINE FALLS LA RGE MOUNTAINS ~, 75-1n~__"> EXTENSIVE SU8STANTIAL UR8AN INQUST. HIGH HIGH EXi:::NSIVE VERY DOMINANT HARMONIOUS DOMINANT HAi'lMONIOUS PANORAMA SUPERIOR K C::) ~ --::) ,ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FORM 3 MCS PROFESSIONAL ( ) COMPOSITE ( ) ~TUDY AREA Orient Monopole Site DATE 12/6/96 NOTES: Area 4 PERSONNEL DISTINCT AVERAGE MINIMAL Wetlands WATER RESOURCES Nearly flat LANDFORM Woodland, farmland and IEGETATION ..etlands Residential and agricutlural LANDUSE Light traffic . USER ACTIVITY Are there any lederall:t1atellocal (inslitu!ional) oOlicies that directly affect ttle Ylsual and .les,nelle resource.s at rne area? It so list them below. No Nole any lmoortant tecnnical recoqnltion in the area. i.e. imcorrant scenic areas otten usee tor literary/artistic pureoses, Wildlife habItat, archaeological 3-ire. erc. None Note Clher lmoortant Issues concernlnQ aesthetIC resources that you think will a/tect tho assessment. None AS aJ ,1" , i ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FORM 4 MCS STUDY AREA ZONE ~ NOTES: Orient Monopole Site Area 4 DATE 12/6/96 PERSONNEL DISTINCT AVERAGE MINIMAL COMMENTS 3 2 1 WAT" "'O",CESI 2 I LANDFORM VEGETATION I 2 LANDUSE I 2 USER ACTIVITY I I SPECIAL I 2 CONSIDERATIONS' I 8 2 TOTALS TOTAL ASSESSMENT VALUE 10 -The following will gl'le you the value lor Special Considerations. A sum ;:,t J distinct, 1-2 average. and a minimal. or more Yes 1 ,~o Q o o Does thIS zone contain any Cultural or Historical Landmarks? IS tnls :one. or areas witnin it, ~nown tor its distinct visual Quality andlor wildlife observatIon? Is this :one free from pOllution and litter? ~(e there ather aesrheric elements that add to tnls resource" I Total 2 A6 ~j . i MANAGEMENT CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY FORM 5 MCS ~ STUDY AREA DATE PERSONNEL TES: - MANAGEMENT CLASS TOTAL ASSESSMENT VALUE Preservation Retention Partial Ret.ntion MOdification Renabilitation 17 and above 14-16 11-1 J C....8 - 'D 1 and below ZONE ~ CLASSIFICATION COMMENTS Area 4 Nodification .0.7 Ai .1.. , VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT FORM 6 VIA BASIC (X) PROJECT NAME Orient Monopole Site LOCATION South of Main Road VIEWPOINT MAP REFERENCE Area 4 ALTERNATIVE ( ) PROJECT DETAILS AND COMMENTS DETAILED DATE TIME WEA THER P=RSONNEL 01 ( ) 12/6/96 I :30 p.m. Overcast UJ .....:,0 z -. o e:-~ '" '"' U Cij-;.u . - c;e. - o E . . ... UJ ;: - o.e_ u - '0_ _ 0 < '" -' UJ '-eaO < 0 . -J Q '0- U <.g I e ;: < < a: < gel)';: w i~: , 00 a: :f UJ "-u -' " ;:., 1.)0 ... w Z "- ... < < - tJtJ _0 <J) > !: OUtDZ U ~~<n ~IJ)UQ COMMENTS " < :I " u <J) USE THE L=T7=R 'A' FOR WITH PLAN CONDITION. USE THE L:T7=R 'e' FOR WITHOUT PLAN CONDITION WATER RESOURCES I LANDFORM I A/B V~GETATION I AlE I LANDUSE IA/E USER ACTIVITY I SPECIAL IA/B CONSIDERATIONS. A/BI I I I A/B I I .! ~ . <> . ~~ I- 0= ~ ,. . < "'".!; EI1 .... : -" ~ UJ U Z < Z - - - < ~ .; . . < II C MI S 0 SC MO C 0 SC MD C II SC MO C 0 SC MI S 0 SC MI S 1lNCOHSPfCUOUS SIGNIFICANT PROMINeNT LANDSCAPE COMPOSITION WITH PLAN X WITHOUT PLAN I X . The following wIll give you rne value for Soeclal CanSloeratlons. '" sum of 3 or more distInct, 1-2 average, and 0 "'lnlmal. y .s 1 No o AlE Ooes thiS :one contain any Cultural or Hisloflcal Landmarks? A/B IS thiS :one, or areas within it, known lor Its oisrinct visual Quality andior wildlife at)servaflon? Is tnlS :one free Irom Collutlon and litter? A/B A B Are there otner aestnetlc elemenr~ thaI .lad :0 thiS (~sou(ce? Total o 2 ;;i&J A8 . ... . SUMMARY VIEWPOINT ASSESSMENT FORM 7 VIA PROJECT NAME Orient LOCATION South of Main Road AL TE:RNATlVE ( ) WITH PLAN ( ) WITHOUT PLAN (X) BASIC (x) DETAILED ( ) DA TE 12/6/96 PERSONNEL PROJE:CT DETAILS AND COMMENTS Erect a 100 foot monopole on agricultural land VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VALUE IVIEW:OINT/ V1EW:OINT Area 1 .\rp"1? VIEWPOINT .\rp.~ 1 I I TOUI. VIEWPOINT __ OF A .., VIEwPOINTS rea :+ aUOTIENT WATER I 0 I 0 I 0 I 2 I 4 I .5 , LANDFORM I 1 1 I 1 I 1 4 I 1 VEGETATION I 2 2 I 2 I 2 I I 4 I 2 I LANDUSE: 2 2 2 2 4 2 USER ACTIVITY 1 1 1 4 1 SPECIAL 0 CONSIDERATIONS 2 2 2 - 2 MODIFIER RA TING ,1..t"\JO~[7'Y C;::::. ComOat3011tty Rating SC'Sca'e C,Jntrast Rating SOR. Soallal Dominance ~ a tlng ~~7rNG 15 c:: c:: I ~ ::: u c u c u U II> II> U II> II> U II> II> U II> " i - .. " WATER I None I None None e MI S None LANDFORM Ie MI I e HI I S S e MI S sc MO e 'e MI S VEGE:T A TION Isc MO e I se 110 e sc MO e se MO e Ise MO e LANDUSE Ise MO e I sc MO c se e /se MO sc MO e MO e USER ACTIVITY Isc 111 OS I sc ,10 e sc MO OS SC MI S Jsc MO OS Speical ConSiderationJsc MI S I sc ~n s SC MO S SC MI S I SC 111 S LANDSCAPE COMPOSITION I I r I p Prominent S Signdlcan! I !nconSOtCuous A9 ..~j .~ · ". VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FORM 8 VIA PROJECT NAME Orient Monopole Site South of Main Road BASIC (xl DETAILED ( l LOCATION ALTERNATlVE (l WITH PLAN (Xl WITHOUT PLAN ( l DATE 12/6/96 PERSONNEL PROJECT DETAILS AND COMMENTS Erect 100 foot monopole on agricultural land VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VALUE I I Tom I I EV'UATOR EVALUATOR I :" ....LUA TO~ EV"'LUArOR .". OF auo TlEN T Are~ 1 A.rea 2 Area 3 Area 4 IEVALUATO~S, WATER I 0 0 I 0 I 2 I 4 I .5 LANDFORM 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 4 I 1 VEGETATION I 2 2 I 2 2 I I 4 , 2 LANDUSE 2 I 2 I 2 I 2 I 4 I 1 USER ACTIVITY I , , I 1 I 1 I 4 I 1 , SPECIAL I CONSIDERA TIONS , , . 2 2 2 - VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VALUE MODIFIER RATING MAJCi=lIi'Y CR. Comca:aCllit'l Haring SC-Scale ::.:Jntrast Hating SOA. Scatial Dominance RatIng HA riNG I~ I c:: c:: I u 0 ~ u 0 c:: u 0 ~ u c = <..; - :n '" U '" '" u '" '" u '" '" , - -. '" WATER lIone ~one lIone I C MI S I None LANDFORM I ....T ....' C MI '1EGET A TION Isc MO C SC :'10 C SC MO C I sc MO C I sc MO C LANDUSE ISC MO C Isc MO C SC MO C I sc MO C I sc MO C USER ACTIVITY ISC MO DS SC :-!O C SC MO DS SC MI S Isc MO S Speical Consideration I SC MI S Isc :!I S SC MO S SC MI S I SC MI S LANDSCAPE i COMPOSITION I S S I , I!S I p Prominent i S Signllicant I InconSOICUous Al0 .aj ;.' ,_.".~, ..~-;l:~: ;..."',...."'_-....,.-'"'i'i .. . -~- . \~ ...... PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~' BENNETI ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 8,1998 Matthew E, Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown 366 Veterans Memorial Hwy. Commack, NY 11725 Re: Proposed site plans for Bell Atlantic Mobile, Mattituck SCTM# 1000-141-3-34 and Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Pachman: There has been no response to our last letter dated December 31, 1997 (see enclosure). I'd appreciate some direction from you as to whether your client wishes to proceed with these applications or not. Sincerely, ~~ Valerie Scopaz , Town Planner enc. - . ,~-T-::;'::---"-Q;-:::>-----::.... . ,"-~~llfFOl.t A~ 'v ~.., "<2 - }~.~.~. ,y" -~-...;, ~:::. "" ~ 8;; ~U ~-e.. ~;, ~ ?A.. ~~ _,; ~Q./ + i-"S-(/ ~':dP Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNEIT ORLOWSKI, JR Chai rman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR RICHARD G. WARD December 31, 1997 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Matthew E. Pachman Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Cammack, NY 11725 Re: Proposed Site Plan applications for Telecommunications Towers to be operated by Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc. at the following locations: 1. Westphalia A venue, Mattituck SCTM # 1000-141-3-34 and 2. 24850 Main Road, Orient SCTM # 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr.~ With regard to your correspondence of December 29th, I am aware of the new disapproval and of the pending hearing before the Zoning Board for the Mattituck site. However, there is nothing in our files from either you or your client indicating how you wish the Planning Board to proceed with the application before them. Neither the Board nor its staff have the authority to extrapolate or assume from your actions before the Zoning Board how you wish to proceed before the Planning Board. '..... I Secondly, the two letters sent to you previously pertained to the Orient site as well. Because that proposal received a Positive Declaration, the next step is to set a date for the scoping session. However, there is an environmental fee attached to that process. Given your client's past reluctance to paying environmental review fees, the Board was extending the courtesy of checking whether your client wished to proceed with the Orient proposal as it stands or whether your client wished to modify the proposal to bring it into compliance with the new legislation. If your client wishes to proceed with the Orient application as is, we will schedule a scoping session within the next few weeks. Be aware however, that there will be a non-refundable scoping fee which must be paid the day the scoping session is held. If your client changes the application after the scoping session is held, the session's findings may no longer be applicable and the environmental review process itself may have to be revisited in order to adequately consider the new or modified application. Since these actions may generate additional fees, it is in . . . ::'iueF IS PACHMAN. PACHMAN&BROWN. P.G. ATTORNEYS .166 VETERANS MEr<-tORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK. NEW YORK 11725 (516l543-2200 TELEGOPIER (5161543'2271 HOWARD E. PACHMAN MATTHEW E. PAGHMAN KAREN R. BROWN. COUNSEL ........50 ADMIrn:o IN NEW .1I':I'ISI':Y January 20, 1998 HARVEY B. BE5Ul'\"DER AMEL R. MASSA Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attn. Ed Forester, Building Inspector Re: New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc. (BAM) Site: 24850 Main Road, Orient Dear Mr. Forester: As you will recall, last month Richard C. Ryan, on behalf of BAM filed a new building permit application with respect to erecting a public utility cellular telephone communications facility at the above noted site and requested that you, in your capacity as a building official, provide a written letter of denial. The purpose of this request was to determine what applications and relief would be necessary for BAM to build the communications facility, at the above site, under the new local law concerning a telecommunications tower. As of yet, we have not received this denial. Obviously, it is impossible for us to determine how we, on behalf of BAM, can proceed without the appropriate determination from you as the administrative official charged with the duty of enforcing the zoning laws in the Town of Southold pursuant to New York state Town Law SS 138 and 267-a(4). It is the position of the Town's special counsel, that BAM should continue to process the application under the new local law to see if the site would be approved. JAN21_ 00 HOLD TOWN NNING BOARD . . . " Town of Southold Attn. BUilding Inspector January 20, 1998 -Page 2- Re: Site: 24850 Main Road, Orient Please immediately forward the denial to my office. ver~ours, MATTHEW E. PACHMAN MEP/egm Cc: IValerie Scopaz, Planner Laury L.Oowd, Town Attorney Gerard Goehringer, Chairperson of the Board of Zoning Appeals egm:G:\DATA\CLIENTS\8AM\ORIENT-P\FEDERAL\8LDGINS.DOC . , . ,~~.:>--::;:... ""'~:<;,\lFFOl.r ~ ,(' D" t'a ~" i'Y~ ~_"'~" 0!~ -~, -.,1- ~'1 ,co . ~ ~cn .-e.~ ':\~ ~,~ ~ -t.. · ~'t- ,:/ ~"Q./ + io'S,,,/ ~,...y <<0--=,-- . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chai rman WILLIAM J, CREMERS KENNETH L, EDWARDS GEORGE RITCillE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G, WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 December 31, 1997 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Matthew E, Pachman Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P,C, 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, NY 11725 Re: Proposed Site Plan applications for Telecommunications Towers to be operated by Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc. at the following locations: 1. Westphalia Avenue, Mattituck SCTM # 1000-141-3-34 and 2. 24850 Main Road, Orient SCTM # 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr,~ With regard to your correspondence of December 29th, I am aware of the new disapproval and of the pending hearing before the Zoning Board for the Mattituck site, However, there is nothing in our files from either you or your client indicating how you wish the Planning Board to proceed with the application before them, Neither the Board nor its staff have the authority to extrapolate or assume from your actions before the Zoning Board how you wish to proceed before the Planning Board. . Secondly, the two letters sent to you previously pertained to the Orient site as well, Because that proposal received a Positive Declaration, the next step is to set a date for the scoping session, However, there is an environmental fee attached to that process, Given your client's pasi reluctance to paying environmental review fees, the Board was extending the courtesy of checking whether your client wished to proceed with the Orient proposal as it stands or whether your client wished to modify the proposal to bring it into compliance with the new legislation, If your client wishes to proceed with the Orient application as is, we will schedule a scoping session within the next few weeks, Be aware however, that there will be a non-refundable scoping fee which must be paid the day the scoping session is held, If your client changes the application after the scoping session is held, the session's findings may no longer be applicable and the environmental review process itself may have to be revisited in order to adequately consider the new or modified application. Since these actions may generate additional fees, it is in .. . . your client's best interest to make a timely determination as to how the Orient application is to be processed. In closing, however your client chooses to proceed with its application before the Zoning Board of Appeals, the site plan application is a separate application to a different board. I realize this must seem like extraneous paperwork, but, for record keeping purposes, the Planning Board must have a written response to its letters indicating how your client wishes to proceed with each of the applications before it. Trusting this explains our position, I look forward to your reply. Sincerely, ~~~ Valerie sc~~5 Town Planner cc: Anthony Tohill, Special Counsel Zoning Board of Appeals Richard Weyhreter, Real Estate Manager, BAM, Inc. . . 5:.( 6F vS PAGHMAN, PAGHMAN & BROWN, P.C. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK. NEW YORK 11725 (516) 1543-2200 TELECOPIER (516) 543-2271 HOWARD E. PACHMAN MATTHEW E. PACHMAN KAREN R. BROWN. COUNSEL '^,-90 ADMITTED IN NEw .JERSl':Y HARVEYB.BESUNDER AMEL R. MASSA December 29, 1997 Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Proposed Site Plan application for Telecommunications Towers to be operated by Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc. ("BAM") at the following locations: Westphalia Avenue, Mattitutck SCTM #1000-141-3-34; and 24850 Main Road, Orient SCTM #1000-18-6-5 Dear Valerie: With regard to your December 15, 1997 letter, I assumed that you were aware that the Chairman of the BZA had requested, pursuant to letter, dated November 20, 1997 (a copy of which is enclosed for easy reference) that, on behalf of BAM, I file a new application with the Building Department. That was done shortly after receipt of Mr. Goehringer's letter. On December 15, 1997, we received a new letter of denial, a copy of which I also enclose for your convenience. Within a day or so after receipt of the new letter of denial, my office confirmed that a hearing has been set on this application for February 4, 1998. r~"-'~ ,:f'\! ;v; j n":~ UUi DEe 30 L".._..... i~~~L\fl1itL:[:L.,.".i . . Page 2 Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner December 29, 1997 It would be beneficial if, before update, the Planning Department Building Department and BZA. sending us letters requesting first communicated with the Very truly yours, MA~A~ MEP!blb enclosures cc: Southold Board of Zoning Appeals . . .bam\orient-p\scopaz.ltS . . Lydia A. Tortora N Solllhold Thwn Hall / \ 53095 Main Road . P.O. Box 1179 Sollthold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer. Chairman James uinizio. Jr, BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 20, 1997 Messrs. Howard and Matt Pa('bpuan Pa("h.....n, Pa"h-n and Brown, Esqs. 366 Veteraoa Memorial Hichway COllllllllCk, NY 11728 ae: Appl. of BeU-NYNEX Proposal at Mattituck (Rehm) 1000-141-3-34 Gentlemen: In revie~ the DeW local law which was adopted by the TOWD Board on November 12, 1997. it is requested that the appUcaDtII file an application tor an update, amendment or new Notice of Disapproval by the Bullding IDSpector to outline each possible noDCOnfOrmity with the law. ThiB would allow the appliCllDt tD proceed with an amendment or other chanp with the pendJne appeal tor variances under the updated Notice of Disapproval. Thank you. cc: v.e~~, /? / ~" , . -.... ,," ..- / ./ .../ GERARD P. GOEHR(NGER /' CHAIRMAN Bulld.inC Depart~t Attn: Ed Forrester All ZBA Members . roWN Of SOUTBOlO 80ILOINC DEPARTMENT SOtrnlOLO. II.Y. . :.ajc.'27r P.02 .~ - NOTICE Of DISAPPROVAL ~ .licb.~d.W.Yb~eCe~..A/C.~.......... . !iQ.''ltrt~~H. !t!I:,.........,............. .~"9~~..!f1. -'-'~9.1...................... DAn: : p!!!=~.r. .1.5.>. .1.~9? . . P'LEASE ua NOTICE: th.u your al'l'lieatiou dated ~-.::i.l. .~l<4........... 19~? '" for pumie eo ere~~. JIl1!i. ~~. ... .199.'. !1J?:..~ct'.~;'Z;~1..tt~~ '~~'. .,,~~ .'!~~i! .l!r;r;<!':~~4.!~ 'Z40' Locatiou of Properey ...!t.2'.............~~lA.~............~n~~...... louae 10. Streee &a.lee County'Tu: /tal' 1'0. 1000 - Seccion ..1.4.1....... Stoat ...Q~...... LOT ...~........ Subdivisioa ............................... Fil..d lfap 11'0. ........ .Lot !fo. ....... is ....tunJ..d "..r\!WiCh md dis..ppr~d oa the lolloviD.S groUDds 1l.I1aia .IJOD":'coofoQlil1..1o' ).PS:II~llsl. j.P. ~P. J.J.. pJ...a.c.r.i.c.t<. .~...~ .I,~t;, .~lt~ .q{ .4J!Ilr:q~~~~4!~t .!~.~qq .l!'l: .n: .n-!~!~Hl. ~~!I! .i.s. !IJ1. ~R-1~.i!l8. P~.i.I~.i.IJ..& .~ot '~~'. ,~~ .1!~C!~~4 . '!l!4~r;~~~~. '!~~ . ~!r;,! .JI!Il?~~;~. ~~. ~1~~~!', !'!JP.l!i. ~"-uj...r". MI. .~.i.t.i.~1.. .4.~..~.~.. . ~r; ~ .~~~I!r; . r;~ . ~~~':;~ .~! . !C?<<?:- !~~: . ~? . ~!I. . . . . JJ.r.oJ1!>..~. .f~~~. ~!1!!-.l.o..8!1:.r.... ~~~~~ .r:i!'! .l!~~~l!l?;~ .,!~~~r; .~~ .~~:.~. ~~: .~:!~~.~~. ~~~7~!. %ZII 100-231. J) lb. propoaed buildinc aDd tOMer are required to be setback 70' fr~ the .................................................................................-:...................................... rear }:ard liDe ~r_Dt to "rtic:le XIV 100-142. 4) lbe propoMd buildiDI i. required tc .. ... ... ........... ............................................................................................................ be setback 20' lroa the side yard lioes OD the Dortb side purSDaDt to Artic:le 100-142. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . .. . . . . ..... .. . . . .. '" . ...... . ... ..... . ... ..... .. . ... . . .... . .. ........... . . .. . . .. . . .. ... ..... '" . ..... .. . . . . .~t.~o..D.. .r...~.i.r.e.d..~ .~. Zoniq Board of Appeab. Plaaaug Board appro.at also r.quired. ........................... .............. .... .............. ....... ...-.... ..... .... ............ . . .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . '",. . .... . . . . .. ..... .. ... .. . ... ....... . . . .. .... .. ..... . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . ..... . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. .. . ........................................................................................................... ..~2;..~................. 8111[I;l)DlG "::CTOR ilV 1/80 . ~ c;.\\fFOl,f ~ ~~.~~\ ~ ~~. en '"" ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETHL.EDWARDS GEORGE RITCIDE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 December 15, 1997 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Matthew E. Pachman Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, NY 11725 Re: Proposed Site Plan applications for Telecommunications Towers to be operated by Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc. at the following locations: 1, Westphalia Avenue, Mattituck SCTM # 1000-141-3-34 and 2. 24850 Main Road, Orient SCTM # 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Pachman, With regard to my November 20th letter, a copy of which is enclosed for your convenience, I am writing to ascertain what course of action your client has elected to pursue. As mentioned in the previous letter, the following options exist: 1. leave the application as it stands, 2. withdraw the application (and submit a new one), 3. or amend the existing application to conform to the new legislation. I look forward to a written response indicating how your client wishes to proceed with its applications, particularly since the Zoning Board is asking for a status report as to the Mattituck application. A response on your part would help us expedite the processing of the application. Sinyrely, t/~~ Valerie Scopaz Town Planner enclosure cc: Town Attorney Zoning Board of Appeals Richard Weyhreter, Real Estate Manager, BAM, Inc. . .. ~ 11 IMPORTANT >> File Number: P1-473800-00121 00 Use the above number in all correspondence about this action! To the Lead Agency: The above information confirms that filings on the described positive Declaration were officially received by, and entered in the SEQR Repository on the date(s) shown in the box headed DATE RECEIVED above. The latest filing is indicated by the most recent date in that box. The date and time in the second line show when this document was printed. Please check the information above carefully. For corrections or questions contact Charles Lockrow, (518)457-2224, or write to: SEQR Repository NYSDEC Division of Regulatory Affairs 50 Wolf Road, Room 514 Albany, NY 12233 Box 1179 [,.1"::::;"'-.. ~.~""_.._- :> P n l ,I.. '1'..1', L\DEC I I Town of SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road-P.O. Southold, NY 11971 i991 . . WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD , ~ c;,\lfFOl.t e ~ ~.'V!:<~ ~ ~~ ::l ;..c. '~ c:> - . , Cf.l ~E ~ ; J:!. fj ~~ .. :;:", ~~c1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 25, 1997 Matthew E. Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Hwy. Commack, NY 11725 Re: FOIL request of November 18, 1997 regarding Telecommunication Towers, Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc., at the following locations: 1. Westphalia Rd., Mattituck SCTM# 1000-141-3-34 and 2. 24850 Main Rd., Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Pachman: As per your FOIL request, enclosed is a copy of the minutes of the Planning Board meeting of Monday, November 3, 1997 with respect to the above- referenced applications. Sincerely, ~JUr Valerie Scopaz ~ Town Planner ~ enc. cc: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 November 20, 1997 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Matthew E. Pachman Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, NY 11725 Re: Proposed Site Plan applications for Telecommunications Towers to be operated by Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc. at the following locations: 1. Westphalia Avenue, Mattituck SCTM # 1000-141-3-34 and 2. 24850 Main Road, Orient SCTM # 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Pachman, Enclosed is a copy of Southold Town's new legislation regarding telecommunication towers. It was adopted by the Town Board on November 12th, 1997. The above-noted applications will be reviewed in accordance with this legislation. After you and your client have had a chance to assess the pending applications in light of the new legislation, please inform the Planning Board how your client wishes to proceed. The following options exist: leave the application as it stands, withdraw the application (and submit a new one), or amend the existing application to conform to the new legislation. I look forward to a written response indicating how your client wishes to proceed with its applications. ~erel~ ' ~~~ Town Planner / enclosure cc: Town Attorney Zoning Board of Appeals Richard Weyhreter, Real Estate Manager, BAM, Inc. . . 3" f'5F R'I,-Fl~ vs PACHMAN. PACHMAN&BROWN. P.G. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK. NEW YORK 11725 (516) 543-2200 TELEGOPIER (5161543-2271 HOWARD E. PAGHMAN MATTHEW E. PACHMAN KAREN R. BROWN. COUNSEL "^"-SO^,,MITTEDINNISW..JERSEY HARVEY B. BESUNDER PATRICK A. SWEENEY AMEL R. MASSA November 18, 1997 Planning Department Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: FOIL Request Dear Sir/Madam: In accordance with the provisions of the New York Freedom of Information Law, New York Public Officers Law Article 6, the undersigned hereby requests copies of all agency records as set forth in Schedule A attached hereto. We agree to pay any appropriate statutory fees. If any documents responsive to this request are withheld on the grounds that they are exempt from public disclosure, please provide a list of the withheld documents stating the basis for the claims of exemption. Also, please identify the name and the address of the person or body to whom an appeal of the decision to withhold said records can be made. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. MEP/blb attachment Very truly yours, ~ MATTHEW E. PACHMAN . . .bam\mattituck\foil.ltS .~.."'<.~-, r-'j ! rf 1 f lUll ',1, 'c, ',. t<<W191997 luq r'L,,-~. ~.j~"J! ::'0'11' r)' j !:.t~:,J._rl ~~J~~.~_"" ..J. -- . . SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTED Copies of the minute, transcript, or audiotape of the Planning Board meeting of Monday, November 3, 1997 with respect the Bell Atlantic Mobile applications in Orient and Mattituck. . . J. LANCE MALLAMO mSTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANT 5 THREE SISTERS HOLLOW HEAD OF THE HARBOR ST. JAMES, L.I., NEW YORK 11780 October 29, 1997 Howard Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman and Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, New York I 1725 RE: BELL ATLANTIC MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY 24850 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, N. Y. Dear Mr. Pachman: As per the request of Bell Atlantic Mobile, this consultant has reviewed the site and immediate surroundings for the mobile communications facility at 24850 Main Road, Orient, Town of Southold, New York. Specifically the charge presented was to identi(y and/or confirm the existence of historic districts or landmark properties listed by federal, state and town agencies within the immediate area of the mobile communications facility. The following is a report on my findings: · There are no sites, structures, buildings, districts, objects, thematic or multiple resources listed, or determined eligible for listing, on the National or State Registers of Historic Places within the project area. · There are no sites or districts listed on the Southold Register of Designated Landmarks within the project area. · Two structures were identified by the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities (SPLIA) for the New York State Historic Building-Structure Inventory within the area. However, while surveyed, these structures do not meet the criteria established by Federal, state or town agencies for historic designation. The structures identified are as follows: I. Bower-Young House- The structure has apparently been modified many times over the years and the original design and architectural features have been compromised by the addition of a large dormer, wing, and new windows. . . Documentation of historic or architectural significance on the SPLIA survey is limited to an unconfirmed review of 19th century maps but accurate historical associations could not be verified by additional primary source material. The name ''Bower-Young House" was apparently developed by the SPLlA research assistant, and has not been verified to have any substantive relationship to the structure. 2. Anne Hopkins House- An oral interview undertaken nearly a decade ago claims that this structure was moved to this site from a previous location on the Orient school grounds. While this assertion has not been substantiated, the structure does not appear at this location on 19th century maps. Moved structures are generally ineligible for historic designation since the historical significance of a building is most often comprised by its removal from the original setting. In addition, the structure in question has apparently been modified many times over the years with various wings and dormers added, windows replaced, and original building fabric removed, resulting in further loss of its architectural integrity. The name "Anne Hopkins House" relates to the owner of record when the SPLIA form was completed in 1988 and is not associated historically with the house. No further documentation has been substantiated. The reliance of historic preservation policy on the identification of potential historic sites identifed by SPLIA is uninformed and somewhat misleading. SPLIA does not, on its own, prepare an official listing of Long Island's historic resources or establish criteria to define historic. Instead, the role SPLIA has taken has been to coordinate the Historic Resources Survey for the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation which seeks to locate and identifY potentially historic sites and structures within the bi-county region. This is part of the initial application procedure for the State and National Register of Historic Places. As the coordinator of the Historic Buildings Survey, SPLIA research assistants and interested volunteers canvas geographic areas and roadways of Long Island in an attempt to identifY buildings and sites that may have historic importance. Ideally Building! Structure Inventory Forms, commonly known as ''Blue Forms" are prepared by properly trained individuals in conformance with instructions provided by the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, Field Services Bureau But in spite of the value of this massive effort to identifY potential historic landmarks, the survey should not be considered as an official list of documented historic structures and sites. Execution of the blue forms is often sparse at best and information can be based on oral hearsay, a physical "walkabout" or "windshield drive-by" of the subject property, at times by untrained persons with little in the way of substantive historical knowledge, . . documentation or research. Furthermore, blue forms may be executed and sent to New York State by virtually anyone for any property regardless of their association or understanding of the historic or architectural significance of the site. Although state instructions suggest inventory forms must be completed in full and that incomplete forms will be returned, this is rarely the case and most submissions are routinely accepted. When blue forms are completed and submitted to New York State, the listing is entered on a statewide computer inventory of potential historic resources without confirmation by state officials of the facts as presented. This can become a problem when potentially historic sites and structures are accepted as historic solely on the basis of the survey without adequate review or confirmation of the historical record by verified documentary sources. As an example, in Mastic Beach a 1960's 7 Eleven convenience store and an A & P supermarket are listed on the statewide inventory of historic sites based on the fact that the researcher identified the colonial- style cupolas atop both buildings with the colonial period of Suffolk County history. The SPLlA inventory has no official status in and of itself and it functions solely as a preliminary information source. Each site or building/structure listed in the inventory must be independently reviewed and confirmed to authenticate historical integrity by federal, state and local government agencies before the information presented is accepted for landmark designation purposes. Based upon the above, the erection of the proposed cellular communications facility at the 24850 Main Road location, especially in the form of a silo or bell tower, will have no affect on documented cultural resources. I have enclosed a copy of my curriculum vitae outlining my credentials in the field of historic preservation, as well as copies of pertinent listings confirming my findings. I hope you find this information useful. If you have any further questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. ve::J:ly yours, Ab~ Enclosures . . J, LANCE MALLAMO 5 THREE SISlERS HOLLOW HEAD OF 1HE HARBOR ST. JAMES, L.I., NEW YORK 11780 (516) 862-8725 EDUCATION Master of Planning, Hunter College of the City University of New York Honors Graduate, James Felt Memorial Fellow Relevant course training: Historic Preservation, Preservation Planning Theory, Cost/Benefit Analysis and Statistical Theory, Site Planning, Architecture. Bachelor of Arts, State University of New York at Stony Brook Honors Graduate, History Major, Fine Arts Minor Relevant course training: Advanced seminars in European and American History, New York State History, Senior Honors Project in Long Island History, Art History, 19th Painting and Sculpture, European and American Architectore: 18th-20th Centuries, Fine Arts of Colonial America, Social Anthropology, Astronomy, Earth Science. EMPLOYMENT September 1997- Present, Interim Director, Suffolk County Vanderbilt Museum. I 987-Present, Suffolk County Historian, County of Suffolk, New York. Appointed by the Suffolk County Executive and Legislature as the official historian of Suffolk County government. Duties include coordinating activities of Town, Village and Local Historians, records management and acting as chief information contact on all official requests for information on the history of Suffolk County. 1983-Present, Director of Historic Services, County of Suffolk, New York. Responsible for the full administration, restoration, preservation, maintenance, protection and interpretation of 227 historic landmarks and sites owned and operated by the Suffolk County Department of Parks. Duties include those of Manager of the Historic Trust, plus additional responsibilities such as the development, design and oversight of all aspects of historic preservation and interpretive programs including budgeting, fund development, grantsmanship, public relations and the development of poblic/private partoerships. Also charged with the development of policy reconunendations advising the County Executive and Legislature on the potential impact of proposed government actions on cuIlural and historic resources within Suffolk County. 1980-1983, Manager of the Historic Trust, County of Suffolk, New York. Inaugurated innovative county government program which mandated appropriate preservation, restoration and maintenance for designated historic landmarks, sites, archaeological resources, fealures and scenic vistas within the Suffolk County Parks system. Duties included preservation policy planning, preparation of nominations to the State and National Registers of Historic Places, and the creation and development of programs necessary to sustain, interpret and promote historic sites such as publications, collections, exhibits, conferences, seminars and special events. . . A WARDS New York State Historic Preservation Award-1989. Awarded by Governor Mario Cuomo for the preservation of cultural and historic resources within Suffolk County. Preservation League of New York State-1989. Awarded for the development of innovative Landmark Preserve Program developed between Suffolk County and the Friends for Long Island's Heritage. RECENT PUBLICATIONS Long Island Architecture, Heart of the Lakes Press, 1992. "Learning From Long Island: Order and Chaos of the Vehicular Age." Robert Moses: Single-minded Genius, Heart of the Lakes Press, 1990. "Robert Moses and the Development of Long Island's State Parkways." RELATED PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Member or former member of the Board of Directors of the following organizations: Board of Architectural Review, Inc. Village of Head of the Harbor, New York. Master Plan Committee, Inc. Village of Head of the Harbor, New York. County Historians Association of New York State (Current 1st Vice-president, Chairman, Legislative Committee), Friends for Long Island's Heritage, Suffolk County Historical Society, Suffolk County ArchaeolOgical Association, Suffolk County Black History Association, Smithtown Historical Society, Three Village Historical Society (Past Vice-president), County Executive's Blue Ribbon Task Force on the Vanderbilt Museum, Suffolk County Tercentermial Commission. . Member or former member of the following professional organizations: American Planning Association, Association of Preservation Technology, National Trust for Historic Preservation, New York State Historical Association, Society for Commercial Archaeology, Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities, American Association for State and Local History, Long Island Museum Association, Association of Suffolk County Historical Societies. GRANTS Since 1987 have secured and administrated over $3,000,000 in direct grants and gifts on behalf of historic properties within Suffolk County ParkIands from State and Federal agencies, private foundations, corporations and individual donors. PERSONAL Forty five years of age, married, five children, excellent health. REFERENCES On Request . . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD (J REGISTER OF DESIGNATED (J LANDMARKS ~ 1 983 - 1 996 Town of Southold Landmark Preservation Commission Desigll: Illuminations Graphic Design, Greenport, New York Printing and Binding: Academy Press, Sou/hold, New York Deacon lames Horton House Prince House Thomas Moore House First Universalist Church The Prince Building Cleveland-Glover-Gagen Blacksmith Shop HallockICu"ie-Bell House Pine Neck Barn Downs Ca"iage House The Bayview School Horton Point Lighthouse First Presbyterian Church leremiah Vail-Booth House Fanning-Doroski House Y oungs-Guerlain-Coyle House Frank I. McIntosh Residence Show House Terry-Mulford House T errywold Village House Webb House High-Theil House Gideon Youngs House"o Nathan B. Seidman Residence Historic Sites Benjamin Frank/in's Milestones The Commoners' Preserve . (Continued) Southold Greenport Orient . . . Laurel Cleaves-Kuester House Mattituck Reeve-Pim House Wells-Lyons House Reeve- WickJUlm House New Suffolk Methodist Mission Old Harbor House Cu tchogue The Old Place Honeymoon Cottage Old House Wickham Farmhouse David Tuthill Farmstead Moore-Llzewski House Early Colonists House Hamid House Independent Congregational , Buckinghom-Case-Richmond House Richard Hallock House Hurricane Hall Einstein House Cutchogue Diner Peconic Isaac Overton House The Old Castle Southold Town Doctor's House Joseph Reeve House Abidjah Corey House . Bayles-Tuthill-Corey House Joseph Horton House John Booth House (Con " _.... ."..~ 560 NEW YORK St. Lawrence County-Continued j. us Post Office-Canton [US Post Offices in New York State, t858-1943, TRJ, Park .It, Canton, 11/17/88, A, C, 88002469 US Post Office-Gouvemeur [US Post Offices in New York State, 1858-1943, TR], 35 Grove .It, Gouverneur, 5/11/89, A, C, 88002516 US Post Olfice-Potsdam [US Post Offices in New York State, 1858-1943, TR], 21 Elm .It, Potsdam, 5/1I/89,A, C, 88002410 United Methodist Church [Morristown Village MRA], Gouveneur .It, Morristown, 9/02/82, C, a, 82004690 Village Park Historic District, Both sides 01 Main and Park .Its., and Park Pl., Canton, 5/06/75, A, B, C. a, 75002087 Village Park Historic District (Boundary In- crease), 7.100 Main .It N, and 70, 76, 80, 90, Main .It .I, Canton, 9/29/83, A, C, 83001794 Waddington Historic District, Jct. of NY 37 and La Grasse .It, Waddington, 5/18/92, A, C, 92000457 West Stockholm Historic District, W, Stockholm and Livingston Rds., West Stockholm, 11/20179, A. C, 0, 79003172 Wright's Stone Store [Morristown Village MRA], Main .It, Morristown, 9/02/82, A, C, 82004691 J ~ $ , :~ ~~ ~:' . ~ " ~ ~: i~ Steuben County il, -~ ;\j; r I ~I )'0\' 'T" Addison Village Hall, Tuscarora and South Sts., Addison, 4/23/80, C, 80002771 Campbell.Rumsey House [Bath Village MRA], 225 E. Steuben .It, Bath, 9/30/83, B, C, 83001795 Church of the Redeemer, Jet of Park and Wall .Its.. Addison, 11/12/92, C, a, 92001577 Cobblestone House [Bath Village MRA], 120 W. Washington St., Bath, 9/30/83, C. 83001796 Davenport Library [Bath Village MRA], W. Morris .It, Bath, 9/30/83, A, B, 83001797 Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Sta- tion, Jet. of Steuben St. and Victory Hwy., Painted Post, t 1/2t/91, A. C, 91001674 Erie Freightbouse Historic District IBath Village MRAJ, Jct. of Cohocton St. and Railroad Ave., Bath, 3/18/91, A, C, 91000235 Gansevoort/East Steuben Streets Historic District [Bath Village MRA], E. Steuben and Ganse- voort .Its.. Bath, 9/30/83, B, C, 83001798 Haverling Farm lIoose [Bath Village MRA], 313 Haverling .It, Bath, 9/30/83, C. 83001799 Hornell Armory, 100 Seneca .It, Hornell, 5/06/80, C, 80002772 Hornell Public Library, 64 Genesee St., Hornell, 2/24175, C, 75001230 Jenning's Tavern, 59 W. Pulteney 51., Corning, 9/20/73, A, 7300 1270 Larrowe !louse. S. Main SU\JS 4 ]!i, Cohocloll, t,/07/H!), C, H!JmI,OHH Liberty Street Historic District [Bath Village MRA], Roughly Liberty .It from E. Morris .It. to Haveding St., Bath, 9/30/83, A. C. 83001800 Market Street Historic District, Market St. from Chestnut .It to Wall St., Corning, 3/01/74, A, C, 74001307 .f; .~ ' ;~: ~' J .: ~1 ~t; ~' t , -:7;' ~ ~ ;, ( :f ~ ~ j' f ':~ :i ., ~;. . , i{ if' ~~ NAL REGISTEl< OF HISTORIC PLACES 1966 TO McMaster House [Bath Village MRA], 207 E. Washington St., Bath, 9/30/83, B, C, 83001801 Pleasaot Valley Wine Company, SR 88, Rheims, 11/18/80, A, C, 80002773 Potter.Van Camp House [Bath Village MRAj, 4 W. Washington St., Bath, 9/30/83, C, 83001802 Robie, Reuben, House [Bath Village MRAj, 16 W. Washiogton St., Bath, 9/30/83, C, 83001803 Sedgwick House [Bath Village MRAj, 101 Haver. ling St., Bath, 9/30/83, C, 8300]804 Shepherd, William, House [Bath Village MRA], 110 W. Washiogtoo St., Bath, 9/30/83, C, 83001805 US Post Office-Bath [US Post Offices io New York State, 1858-1943, TRj, 101 LibertySt., Bath, 11/17/88, A, C, 88002454 US Post Office-Coming [US Post Offices io New York State, IH58-1943, TRJ, 129 Watout St., Corning, t 1/17/88, A, C, 88002474 US Post Office-Painted Post [US Post Offices io New York State, 1858-1943, TRj, 135 N. Hamil. too St., Painted Post, 5/11/89, A. C. 88002395 Ward, M. J, Feed Mill Complex [Bath Village MRA], 1-9 Cameroo St., Bath, 3/18/91, A, C. 91000236 Suffolk County Balcastle [Southampton Village MRA], NW cor. ner of Herrick and lillie Plains Rds., South- ampton, 10/02/86, C, 86002722 Bald Hill Schoolhouse, Horsebiock Rd., Farming- ville, 7/21/88, A, C, a, 88001018 Bay Crest Historic District [Huntington Town MRA], Beech Ave., Valley Rd., Woodside & Val. ley Drs., Huntington Bay, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002486 Baylis, M., House [Huntington Town MRA], 530 Sweet Hollow Rd, Melville, 9/26/85, C, 85002487 Beach Road Historic District [Southampton Vii. lage MRAj, Between Shiooecock and Halsely Neck Rds. on Beach Rd. at Barrier Beach, Southampton, 101O,/H6, C, 86002723 Beachbend [Stony Brook Harbor F.states MPS], Smith Ln., Nissequogue, 8/09/93, A, C, 93000698 Beaux Arts Park Historic District [Huntington Town MRA], l"lCust Ln., Upper & Lower Drs., Iluntington Bay, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002489 Beebe Windmill [Loog Islaod Wind and Tide Mills TR], .IE corner 01 Ocean Rd. and Hildreth Ave., Bridgehamptoo, 12/27/78, A, C, b, 7800 1918 Benjamin, James, Homestead, 1182 Flanders Rd., Flanders, 8113/86, A, C, 86001510 Bethel AME Church and Manse [Huntington Town MRA]. 291 Park Ave., lIulltington, ~J/2{j/HS, A, C, a, H5IKll1!)() B1ydenburgh Park Ilistoric District, Blydcllburgh County Park, Smith town, 8/11/83, A, C, 83001807 Bowers, Dr. Wesley, I-{ouse [Southampton Village MRA], Beach Rd., Southampton, 10102/86, C, 86002699 Bowes House [Huntington Towo MRA], I bor Hill Dr., Huntington Bay, 9/26/85, 85002492 Box Hill Estate, NW 01 .It. James on Morich, St. James vicinity, 12/04/73, B, C, 730012 Bragg, Caleb, Estate, Star Islaod Rd., Mo 11/02/87, C, 87001895 Breese, James L, House, 155 Hill St., Soul ton, 4/18180, C, 80002778 Briar Patch Road Historic District [Village, Hampton MRA j, End of Briar Patch Rd. Georgica Pood, East Hamptoo, 7I21r. 88001029 Brown, George McKesson, Estate-Coindr: [Huntiogtoo Towo MRAj, Browo's Rd., . tingtoo Station, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002493 Brush Farmstead [Huntington Town MRA (;reenlawn Rd., Huntington, 9/26/85, 85002500 Buell's Lane Historic District [Village of Hamptoo MRAj, 47-114 Buell's La., East: too, 7121/88, C, a, b, 88001027 Bullett, Eliphas, House [Huntington Towo " 159 W. Rogues Path, Centerport, 9/26/85, d, 85002495 Bullett, Joseph, House [Huntington Town ~ 169 W. Rogues Path, Cold Spring H, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002497 Bumpstead, John, House [Huntington MRA], 473 Woodbury Rd., Cold Spring H' 9/26/85, C, 85002499 Burr, Carll 5., Mansion [Huntington Town tv 304 Burr Rd., Com mack, 9/26/85, E 85002502 Burr, Carll, Jr., House [Huntington Town ~ 293 Burr Rd., Commack, 9/26/85, C, 8500: By.the.Harbor [Stony Brook Harbor Estates ~ Moriches Rd., Nissequogue, 8/09/93, I 93000699 CULLODEN, H.M.S., Shipwreck Site, Addre< stricted, Mootauk vicinity, 3/05/79, A 79003795 Carll House [Huotiogton Town MRAj, 79 Wa Iluntingtoo, 9/26/85, C, 85002504 Carll HOllse [Huntington Town MRA], 380 Park Rd., Dix Hills, 9/26/85, A, C, 8500250, Carll, Ezra, Homestead [Huntington Town M 49 Melville Rd., Huntington Station, 9/26/8 85002506 Carll, Marion, Farm, 475 Com mack Rd., ( mack, 6/26179, A, C, 79001632 Carolioe Church aod Cemetery, Jet. 01 Dyke Bates Rds" Brookhaven, 9/09/91, C, a 91001148 Chase, William Merritt, Homestead, CanOl Rd, Southamptoo, 6/16/83, B, C. 83oo18Oi Chichester's Inn !Huntington Town MRAJ Cliidwsler Rd., West Hills, 9/26/8.1, A X.'iII()l.'iOH ('old Spring Ilarbor Library IlIuntington T MRA], I Shore Rd., Cold Spriog Hal 9/26/85, A, C, 85002509 Cammack Methodist Church and Cemt [Huntington Town MRAj, 486 Townline Huntiogton, 9/26/85, A, C, a, d, 85002511 "'I ~lkCoun~ontlnued . ~\1l0NAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES 1966 TO ]994 ~ LJ.f :,1 ;, ;~~regational Church of Patchogue, 95 E. Main , 9. Patchogue, 4/01/93, C, a, 93000279 . ",lin, David, House [Huntington Town MRA], "1 High 51., Cold Spring Harbor, 9/26/85, A, B, (,115001513 ;(VIiJin, Nathaniel, House, 280 Deer Park Ave., . Babylon, 12/08/88, C, 88002683 ,'",. Richard, House, Mill Rd., Mattituck, 8/21/86, (,8tiOO1721 :r\l~1her House, 97 Beach Lane, Westhampton I lI<ach, 3/21185, C, 85000630 't Cuning, Bayard, Estate, N of Great River on NY '7 Great River vicinity, 10/02/73, C, 73001271 f\>ia~ater-Bevill Mansion [Huntington Town . IIR\]. Bevin Ln., Asharoken, 9/26/85, A, C, ,1002514 )iOneH, Harry E., House [Huntington Town IIR\I, 71 Locust Ln.. Eatons Neck, 9/26/85, C, \1002516 ~__)wden Tannery [Huntington Town MRA}, 210 W. Rogues Path, Cold Spring Harbor, 9/26/85, .\.c, 85002519 fA;! farm [Stony Brook Harbor F.states MPSj. Harbor Rd., N side, at Shep Jones Ln., Head 01 Ihe Harbor, 8/09/93, A, C, 93000700 tJ.< Hampton Village District [Village of East Hampton MRA], Bounded by Main 51. and James and Woods Lanes, East Hampton, i/02/74, C. 74001309 f.J51 Hampton Village Historic District (Boundal)' Increase) [Village 01 East Hampton MRA], ,"inr1heastward along Main SI. to Newton l.a. Jnd Southwestward along Ocean and Lee Aves. and Pond La. to Hedges La., East Hamp- lon, 7121/88, A, C, 88001032 f~lst Shore Road Historic District [Huntington Town MRA], East Shore Rd., Halesite, 9/26/85, A. C, 85002521 f~10ns Neck Light, Eatons Neck Point at Hunting- ton 8ay and Long Island Sound 011 NY 25A, Huntington, 4/03/73, A, 73001273 Egypl Lane Historic District [Village of East Hamplon MRAI, I I I, 117, and 129 Egypt La. East Hampton, 7/21/88, C, b, 88001031 En'nt, John, HOllse [Huntington Town MRAJ, 130 Old COUllt!)' Rd.. West Hills, 9/2/i/H5, A, C, 851102522 Ft'lix, N. J., House [Huntington Town MRA], 235 Asharoken Ave., Asharoken, 9/2G/85, C, 85002523 Field, Marshall. III. Estate. Lloyd Harbor Rd, lJoyd Harbor, 4/30/79, A, C, 790011;:13 Fire Island Light Station, Robert Moses Causeway, &y Shore vicinily, 9/] ]181, A, C, NPS, 8]0(]OO82 Firsl Presbyterian Church, 175 E. Main St., Smith- rown, 1212:1I7:', C, a, 7700098:1 nllyd, William, IltlllSe, 20 Washington Ave., Mas- lie Ill'ilch, 4/21/71, A, B, C, NPS, 7](](](M](;!; FlIrt Corchaug Site, Address Restricted, Cul- chogue vicinity, 1/18/74.0,74001308 Fort Golgolha and the Old Burial Hill Cemete!)', Main SI. and Nassau Rd., Huntington, 3/02/81, C, D, 8100041:1 ~. ,,' .< , 1 - Fort Hill Estate, Fort Hill Dr., Lloyd Harbor, 6/02/88, A, C, 88000599 Fort Salonga, Address Restricted, Fort Salonga vi- cinity, 5/21/82, A, C, 0, 82003406 Gardiners Island Windmill [Long Island Wind and Tide Mills TRJ. On Gardiners Island, East Hampton, 12/27/78, A, C, 78001912 Geoghegan, Charles, House [Huntington Town MRA], 9 Harbor Hill Dr., Huntington Bay, 9/26/85. A, C, 85002524 Gildersleeve, Andrew, Octagonal Building, Main Rd. and Love Lane, MaUituck. 8/19/76, C, 76001280 Gilsey Mansion [Huntington Town MRA], 36 Browns Rd., Huntington. 9/26/85, C, 85002525 Goodale, Capt. c., House {Southampton Village MRA], 300 Hampton Rd., Southampton, 10/02/86,C,86002725 Goose Hill Road Historic District [Huntington Town MRAJ, Goose Hill Rd.. Cold Spring Har- hor, 9/26/85. A. C, 85002528 Green, John, House [Huntington Town MRAJ, 167 E. Shore Rd., Huntington Bay. 9/26/85, C, 85002526 Greenport Railroad Station, Third and WigginsSt., Greenport, 7/20/89, A, C, 89000947 Greenport Village Historic District, Roughly bounded by Stirling Basin, Main, Monsell, 2nd, and Front Sts., Greenport, 9/13/84, A. C. 84002973 Halliock Inn, 263 E. Main St., Smithtown, 8/07/74, C.7400131O Hallock Homestead, 163 Sound Ave., Northville, 6/07/84, A. C. 84002992 Halsey Estale-Tallwood Illunlington Town MRA], Sweet Hollow Rd., West Hills, 9/26/85. C. 85002527 Harbor House [Stony Brook Harbor Estales MPSj, Spring Hollow Rd., Nissequogue, 8/09/93, A, C. 9300070] Harbor Road Historic District [Huntington Town MRAJ. Harbor Rd, Cold Spring Harbor, 9/26/85, A, B, C, 85002529 Harned, John, House [Huntington Town MRA], 26 Little Neck Rd, Centerport, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002530 Harrison, Wallace K., [stale [Huntington Town MRAj, 140 ROllnd SWillllp Rd_, Wt!sl flills, 9/26/85, B, C, 85002531 Havens, James, Homestead, NY 114, Shelter Is- land, 4/10/86, A, C, 86000701 Hawkins Homestead, IG5 Christian Ave., Stony Brook vicinity, 6/09/88, A, B, C, b, 88000727 lIawkins, Robert, Homestead, Yaphank Ave., Ya- phank, 4/10/86, C, 86000702 Ilayground Windmill [I.llllg Island Wind and Tide Mills TRJ, At Windmill I.ane, East Hampton, ]2/27/78, A, C, 781M119]3 I kckscher Park [Huntington Town MRA], Bounded by Madisoll St., Sabbalh Day Path, Main 51. & Prince AV('., Ilulltingtoll, 9Wi/8S, C, 85002532 Hewleu House [Huntington Town MRA], 559 Woodhury Rd., Cold Spring Harbor. 9/26/85, A, C, 850112533 . NEW YORK 56] Homan-Gerard House and Mills, Jet. Main St. and Yaphank Rd.. Yaphank, 12116/88, A, C, 88002761 Hook Windmill [Long Island Wind and Tide Mills TR; Village 01 East Hampton MRA], N, Main St., East Hampton, 12/27/78, A, C, 7800]914 House at 200 Bay Avenue [Huntington Town MRA], 200 Bay Ave., Huntington Bay, 9/26/85, C, 85002535 House at 244 Park Avenue {Huntington Town MRA], 244 Park Ave., Huntington, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002534 Ireland-Gardiner Fam] [Huntington Town MRA], 863 Lake Rd., Greenlawn, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002537 Jagger House, Old Montauk Hwy., Westhamptoll, 12112/78, C, 78001920 Jarvi..-F1eet House [Huntington Town MRA]. 138 Cove Rd.. Huntington, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002538 Jericho Hisloric District [Village of East Hampton MRA], Montauk Hwy., East Hampton, 7/21/88, C, 88001028 Jones Road Historic District [Village of Easl Hampton MRA], Along Jones Rd. lrom Apa- quogue Rd. to Lilly Pond La.. East Hampton, 7/21/88, A, C, b, 88001030 Kane, John P., Mansion [Huntington Town MRA], 37 Kanes Ln.. Huntington Bay, 9/26/85, C, 85002580 Kennan, A. P. W., House [Huntington Town MRA], Sydney Rd., Huntington Bay, 11/06/85, C, 85003502 Ketchum, B.. House [Huntington Town MRA]. 237 Middleville Rd. Huntington, 9/26/85, C, 85002581 LITTLE JENNIE (Chesapeake Bay bugeye), Cen- terport Harbor, Centerport, 5112/86, A, C, 8600 108 I Land 01 Clover IStony Brook Harbor F.states MPS], Long Beach Rd., 5 side, Nissequogue. 8/09/93, A. C. 93000702 Lloyd Harbor Lighthouse, Entrance 10 Lloyd Har- bor, Lloyd Harbor vicinily, 5/31/89, C, 89000501 Lloyd, Joseph, House, NW 01 Huntington on Lloyd Harbor Rd., Huntington vicinity, ] 1107/76, A, C, 7600 1278 I.ongbotham, Nathaniel, f louse, 1541 Stony Brook Rd., Stony Brook, 11116/89, A. C, 89002022 Losee, Isaac, House [Huntington Town MRAj, 269 Park Ave, Huntington. 9/26/85. A. C, 85002582 Main Street Historic District [Huntington Town MRA], Main 51., Cold Spring Harbor. 9/26/85, A, C, 85oo25B:1 Mallows, The (Stony Brook Harbor Estates MPSj, Emmet Way, I-lead of the Harbor, 8/09/93, A C, 930007113 Masury Estate Ballroom, Old Neck Rd. S, Center Moriches, 9/] fl86, C, 81HM1251:1 Miller Place Historic District, N. Countl)' Rd., Miller Place, 6117/76, C. 76001281 Mills Pond District, W of S1. James on NY 25A, SI. James vicinity, 8/01/73, C, 73001277 =\, ji -i1 j j f J ~" ".'{J' III) lL~ -'I {<..:: i.l~ , IP J:;; :1 i ! Suffolk County-ContJnue. Montauk A'i'iociation Historic District, E of Mon- tauk off NY 27 on DeForest Rd., Monfauk vicin- ity, 10/22/76, A, C, 76001282 Montauk Manor, Fairmont Ave., Montauk, 8/23/84, A, C, 84002995 Montauk Point Lighthouse, Montauk Point, East Hampton vicinity, 7/07/69, A, 69000142 Montauk TennisAuditorium, FJamingon Ave. and Edjemere St, Montauk, 2/08/88, B, C, 88000052 Moran, Thomas, House, Main St., East Hampton, 10/15/66, B, NHL, 66000574 Mount, William Sydney, House, Gould Rd. and NY 25, Stony Brook, 10/15/66, B, NHL, 66000575 North Main Street Historic District [Southampton Village MRAj, N. Main St. !lear CR :i~) alld Rail- road Station Plaza, Southampton, 10/02/86, A, C, 86002730 North Main Street Historic District [Village 01 East Hampton MRA], N. Main St, East Hampton, il21/88, C, a, d, 88001025 O'Donohue, C. A., House {Huntington Town MRA), 158 Shore Rd., Huntington, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002584 Oakley, John, House [Huntington Town MRA], Sweet Hollow Rd., West Hills, 11106/85, C, b, 85003501 Ockers, Jacob, House, 965 Montauk Hwy., Oak- dale, 7/10/92, B, 92000838 Old Fi"t Church [Huntington Town MRA], 126 Main St. Huntington, 11/06/85, A, C, a, 85003500 Old House, The, NY 25, Cutchogue, 10/15/66, A, C, b, NHL, 66000573 Old Town Green Historic District {Huntington Town MRA], Park Ave., Huntington, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002586 Old Town Hall Historic District [Huntington Town MRA], Main 51. & Nassau Rd., Hunting- ton. 9/26/85, A, C, 85002588 Orient Historic District, NY 25, Orient, 5/21/76, C, 76001283 Pantiga Road Historic District [Village of East Hampton MRA], Along Pantigo Rd. lrom Egypt La. and Accabonac Rd. to Amy's La., East Hampton. 7121/88. C, 88001026 Phyfe, James W. and Anne Smith, Estate [Stony Brook Harbor Estates MPS], 87 Stillwater Rd.. Nissequogue, 8/09/93, A, C, 93000704 Pleasants House, NY 27, Amaganseu, 2102/84, C, 84002999 Potter-"WiHiams House [Huntington Town MRAi, 165 Wall 51., Huntington, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002.\79 Prime House [Huntington Town MRAJ, 35 Prime Ave., Huntington, 9/26/85, B, C, 85002568 Prime-Octagon House [Huntington Town MRA]. 41 Prime Ave., Huntinglon, 9/26/85, B, C. 85002569 Rarlio Central Complex, S of Rocky Point 011 Rocky Poinl-Yaphank Rd., Rocky Point vicinity, 6/27/80, A, C. 81l0lJ2777 Rassapcaguc IStony Brook llamor Esla.}sJ, Long Beach Rd., S side, Nissequogue, /93, A, C, 9.1ooo71l5 Remp, Michael, /louse [Huntington Town MRAj, 42 Godlrey Ln., Greenlawn, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002570 Roge" House [Huntington Town MRA], 136 Spring Rd., Huntington, 9/26/85, C, 85002571 RogelS, John, House [Huntington Town MRA), 627 Half Hollow Rd., Huntington, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002572 Roosevelt, John Ellis, Estate, Middle Rd., Sayville, 11/05/87, A, C, 0, 87001896 Ryan, William J., Estate [Stony Brook Harbor Es- tates MPS], Moriches Rd., Nissequogue, 8/09/93, A, C, 93000706 Sag Harbnr Village District, ROllghly bounded by Sag Harbor, Rysam, Hami/loll, Marsden, Main and Lollg Island Ave., Sag Harbor, 7/20/73, A, C,73001274 Sagtikos Manor, Montauk Hwy. (NY 27A), West Bay Shore, 11/21/76, A, C, 76001284 Saint James District, On NY 25A, Saint James, 7/20/73, C, a, 73001275 Sammis, Silas, House [Huntington Town MRAJ, 302 W. Neck Rd., Huntington, 9/26/85, B, C, 85002573 Seaman Fann [Huntington Town MRA], 1378 Carlls Straight Path, Dix Hills, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002.\7.\ Shelter Island Heights Historic District, Roughly bounded by St. Johns St., Tower Hill Rd. Sun- nyside Ave., Meadow Pl., Chase Cr. and Dering Harbor, Shelter Island Heigh~, 5/07193, A, C, 93000335 Shelter Island Windmill [Long Island Wind and Tide Mills TR], N 01 Manwaring Rd., Shelter Is- land, 12/27/78, A, C, b, 781lO1917 Shore Cottage [Stony Brook Harbor Estates MPS], Harbor Rd., E side, Head of the Harbor, 8/1l9/93, A, C, 93000707 Shore Road Historic District [Huntington Town MRA), Shore Rd, Cold Spring Harbor, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002578 Smith Estate, N of Brookhaven at Longwood and Smith Rds., Brookhaven vicinity, 12/10/81,A, C, 81000414 Smith, Daniel, House [Huntington Town MRAJ, 117 W. Shore Rd, Huntington, 9/26/85, C, 85002576 Smith, Henry, Farmstead [Hunfington Tawn MRA], 900 Park Ave., Huntington Station, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002539 Smith, Jacob, House [Huntington Town MRA], High Hold Dr.. West Hills, 9/26/85, A, C, 851lO2540 Smith-Rourke House, 350 S. Country Rd., East I'atchogue, Ilm/89. C, 8901J2021 Southampton Village Historic District {Southamp- ton Village MRA], Rnughly bounded by Hill and Main St5" Old Town Rd., Atlantic Ocean, Coopers Neck anrl Halsey Neck Lns., South- ampton, 4/25/88, A, C, 860112726 Southampton Village Historic District (Boundary Increase) [Southampton Village MRA], Roughly, along Rogers SI., Lewis Sf. allrl Meet- ing f louse Ln. on E side of existing distriCi Southampton, 4/12/93, C, 93000239 Southside Sportsmens Club District, NE 01 Grea River, 011 NY 27, Great River vicinity, 7/23/73 A, C, 73001272 St. Andrew's Episcopal Church, Main St., Ya~ phank, 9/15/88, A, C, a, 88001442 Stony Brook Grist Mill, Harbor Rd. W 01 Main St., Stony Brook, 8/03/90, A, C, 90001140 Suffolk County Almshouse Barn, Yaphank Ave., Yaphank, 9/11/86, A, C, 86002512 Suydam House [Huntington Town MRA], 1 Ft. Sa- longa Rd., Centerport, 10/27/88, A, C, 8800213S Sweet Hollow Presbyterian Church Pa/SOnage [Huntington Town MRA], 152 Old COllnt/)' Rd., Huntington, 9/26/85, A, C, a, 85002541 Terry-Ketcham Inn, 81 Main St., Center Mor- iches, 6/24/93, C, 92000555 Teny-Mulford House, NY 25, Orient, 2/07/84, A, C, 84003003 Thompson House, N. Country Rd., Setauket, 1/07/88, A, C, d, 87002283 Titlls-Bunce House [Huntington Town MRA], 7 Goose Hill Rd., Cold Spring Harbor, 9/26/85, A, C,85002542 Townsend, Henry, House [Huntington Town MRA], 231 W. Neck Rd., Huntington, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002543 Tuthill, David, Fannstead, New Suffolk Lane, Cut- chogue, 11/23/84, A, C,84ooo295 US Post Office-Bay Shore [US Post Offices in New York State, 1858-1943, TR), 10 Bay Shore Ave., Bay Shore, 11117/88, A, C, 88002455 US Post Office-Northport [US POSI Offices in New York State, 1858-1943, TR], 244 Main St., Northport, 5/1 1/89, A, C, 88002356 US Post Office-Patchogue [US POSI Offices in New York State, 1858-1943, TR), 170E. MainSt., Patchogue, 5/11/89, A, C, 88002397 US Post Office-Riverhead [US Post Offices in New York State, 1858-1943, TR), 23 W. Second St., Riverhead, 5/11/89, A, C, 88002424 US Post Office-Westhampton Beach [US POSI Offices in New York State, 1858-1943, TR], Main St., Westhampton Beach, 5/11/89, A, C, 881lO2446 Union Chapel. The Grove, Shelter Island Heigh~, 11/23/84, A, C, a, 84000296 United Methodist Church,S. Ocean Ave. and Church St, Patchogue, 4/19/84, C, a, 84003006 Vail-Leavitt Music Hall, Peconic Ave., Riverhead, 8/25/83, C,83001809 Van Iderstine, Charles, Mansion [Huntington Town MRA], Idle Day Dr., Huntington, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002544 Van Wyck.l..efferts Tide Mill [Long Island Wind and Tide Mills TRJ, 2 mi. NE 01 Mill and Soulh- down Rds., Lloyd Harbor, 12/27178, A, C, 78001916 Vanderbilt, William K., Estate-Eagles Nest [Hun- tington Town MRA], Little Neck Rd., HlInting- tnn, 9/26/85, A, B, C, 851lO2545 Velzer, N., House and Caretaker's Cottage [Hun- tington Town MRA], 22 Fort Salonga Rd., Cen- terport, 9/26/85, A, C, 85002546 j ~'! I ',,'::VI< . 'I' '()J(j(' PlACES I9GG TO 1994 i' i U 11I1I11vm.t\mliljJ!'I' I I r ; (! I. I~ti rl( ;'1 t, , oflg N side 11/%. A, C, )'1:: .1 'I i"j],i: ."rlg IT It'i)'!>a : II: fl, l~l~h(H, . II:, ,/IIIU. \\: 1" VI d illld Tide .~ ) at] n ~rounds, " :'IXI1915 Ilil OIl:l/H:l,A, II, ,\1., lillIS' I:llil:ilton Town \'i] 1.1.. lflni l:)(.n, :)/26/85, C, i~, ,), j Ii Islorle I) .~:II(.t I ]untingloJ] I 1\, 'Nt'Sl Nell U, luntington, ,! ! c,1;;;OUS67 [I tt' A 1:11.'11,', ES\;;L' ISllllly Brook Har- .il ,'vIP';!, liillb()r'I:11 ~:(L, :-;side, Head .lor, 8l()~Wn, A. (' lJ:)(I00708 ls('ph, House -lufltirlgton Towll II' -lill.\ R,j, W,';! 11,11\, 9/2Ii/H5, B, S '1 dt, f '()lJSI~ f11UJltiil~:tlln Tuwn MRA]. '"~ \jhllL1an Rd_, v..l'~" dilts, ~)/2(j/85, A, 'llmS,I'1 \- II) ace HOWie [1"lIntinglon Town (lllC!-t'sler ~,d" W,'stllills. ~J/2(jmS, H, 1-] ~l) Iv f 'Road Historic Dsrict [Southamp- ii, I!~t MRAJ, Wickap':lglJe Rd between ,v J. a:ld Cebb F:d" Southampton, , " A, C, ,3GOO2697 ~ --.( )iph Fouse [Huntington Town MRA], 'l,< r\ve., Humingtol'l, 9126/85, A, C, " ^ II my, House l:I~untington Town i' Mill Ln, Huntinglon, 9/26/85, C, o is:' 1, I ,eI Ivaler Mill [Long 1,land Wind and lill' lRJ, NY 27 and Halsey Lane, South- n, 2.27IiH, A, C, b, 78001919 la'p, House IHuntingtc,n Town MRA], II Ila n S'" Huntington, 9/26/85, A, C, ;1:11 is:-, II ; I , C1liIl, House IHuntington Town MRA). ~"K,\y I{d" Huntington Stalion, 9/26/85, A, SI)I)2:;::.4 " ,,' 'Vllliam Wooden, Hou~e [Huntington 'II MFA}. ~~) Preston 51:., Huntington, ,,;'i/'):), H, C, 851)02555 /. "'!tSt [Stony Brook Harbor Estates MPS], 'I"'id",, Rd., Nisseqnogue, 8/09/93, A, C, ";;"'Klj'O~:j '1 ,III! \1: III, ChJ.r1es, House fHuntington Town , 70 Main St, Huntington, 9/26/85, C, 54 '} :111' lallch o,lb Hisloric District, Jericho Tnpk. ~'I,V r:j jet. with Meadow Rd., Smithtown, ~ I": 1::1::, )I., C, 9tXXll ]43 '''IlIlvall County 'I' -I!~I')II Hotel, Main St, Narrowsburg, 3/31/83, / ;':(':'18011 IlhlOllJillgburg l{vlorrllt'll I'f(lteslallt Dlltch Church, NY 17M, Bloomingburg, 1I10/HO, A, C, a, HOoo2779 Calkins, Ellery, House [Upper Delaware Valley MPS], Co. Rd. 114, E of Delaware R. Bridge, Cochecton, 11/27/92, C, 92001595 Callicoon Methodist Church and Parsonage [Up- per Delaware Valley, New York and Pennsyl- vania, MPSj, Chnrch St (NY 97) S 01 jel. with Seminary Rd" Town of Delaware, Callicoon, 11104/93, C, a, 930111134 Cochecton Presbyterian Church [Upper Dela- ware Valley MPSj, Co. Rd. 11,1. E 01 Delaware R. Bridge, Cochecton, 11/'27/~)2, C, a, 92001597 De]aware Aqueduct, Between Minisink Ford, NY and Lackawaxen, PA, Minisink Ford, 11/24/68, C, NPS, 68000055 Oelaware and Hudson Canal. De]aware and Hud- SOil Canal, Minisink, vicinity, 1 ]/24/68, A, C, NHL,68000051 Drake--Curtis House [Upper Delaware Valley MPSj, Co. Rd. 114, E 01 NY 97, Cochecton, 4/19/93, B, C, 9200159H Glen Wild Methodist Church, Old Glen Wild Rd., Glen Wild, 5/10/84, C, a, H4oo3035 Grahamsville Historic Dislrict, NY 55, Grahams- ville, 12/011/79, A, C, a, d, 7901111134 Jeffersonville School, Terrace Ave., Jeffersonville, 4/28/88, A, C, 88000519 Kirk House, Kirk's Rd., Narrowsburg, 5/1O/H4, C, b, H4003043 Liberty Village Historic District, N. Main, Acad- emy, and Law Sts., Uberty, 4/11/78, C, 78001921 Millanville-Skione", Falls Bridge [Highway Bridges Owned by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation TR], LR 63027 over Delaware River at Millan- ville, Skinne", Falls, 11/14/88, C, 88002167 Minisink Batllefield [Upper Delaware Valley, New York and Pennsylvania, MPS], York Lake Rd. (Co, Rd. 168) N 01 Mio~ink Ford, Minisink Ford vicinity, 9/16/93, A, 93000946 Old Cochecton Cemetery [Upper Delaware Va/- ley MPS], W of NY 97, N of jet. with Co, Rd, 114, CocheClon, 11/27/92, A, d, 92001593 Page House [Upper Delaware Valley MPS], 59 C. Meyer Rd" Cochecton, 11/27/92, C, 92001601 Parsonage Road Historic District [Upper Dela- ware Valley MPS), Pa",onage Rd" Cochecton, 11/27/92, C, 92001600 Pond Eddy Bridge [Highway Bridges Owned by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Depart- ment of Transportation TRj, LR 51013 over Del- aware River, Pond Eddy, vicinity, 11/14/88, C, 88002170 Reilly's Store [Upper Delaware Valley MPSj, Co. Rd, 114, W of jet. with NY 97, Cochecton, 11/27/92, C, 92001594 Riverside Cemetery [Upper De]aware Valley, New York and Pennsylvania, MPSj, NY 97 SE of jet. with Church St., Long Eddy vicinity, 11/18/93, C, d, 930012211 Rock]and Mill Complex, Palen Pl., Rockland, 8123/H4, A, C, H4oo3062 St. James Church and ReClory [Upper Delaware Valley, New York and Pennsylvania, MPS], NY . NEW YORK 563 17B N side, E of jel. with NY 97, Town of Del. aware, Call1coon, 11/04/93, C, a, 93001135 St. Joseph's Seminary [Upper Delaware Valley MPS], Seminary Rd, W side, Callocoon, 7/08/93, C, a, 93ooo5H2 Stone Arch Bridge, N 01 Kenoza L "\e on NY 52, Kenoza Lake vicinity, 12/12/76, A, C, 76001285 Valleau Tavern [Upper Delaware Valley MPS], Jet. of Co. Rd, 114 and NY 97, Cochecton, 11/27/92, A, C, 92001599 Tioga County Akins, Lyman p" House [Berkshire MRA], W, Creek Rd., Berkshire, 7/02/H4, C, 84003067 Akins, Robert, House [Berkshire MRA), Main St., Berkshire, 7/02/H4, C, H4oo3069 Ball, J, House [Berkshire MRA), NY 38, Berkshire, 7/02/H4, A, C, H4oo3072 Ball, Levi, House [Berkshire MRA], NY 38, Berk- shire, 7/02/H4, A, C, H4oo3075 Ball, Stephen, House [Berkshire MRA], Main St., Berkshire, 7/02/H4, C, H4oo3077 Be]cher Family llomestead and Farm [Berkshire MRA), NY 38, Berkshire, 7/02/84, A, C, H4oo3082 Bement-Billings House, NY 38, N 01 Newark Val- ley, Newark Valley, 2/19190, A, C, 90000002 Berkshire Village Historic District [Berkshire MRA], Maio St. and Leonard Ave., Berkshire, 7/02/84, A, C, 84003086 Bulfington, Calvin A, House [Berkshire MRA], Depot St. and Railroad Ave" Berkshire, 7/02/H4, B, C, 84003089 Collins, Nathaniel Bishop, House [Berkshire MRA], NY 38, Berkshire, 7/02/84, C, 84003096 East Berkshire United Methodist Church [Berk- shire MRA], E, Berkshire Rd" Berkshire, 7/02/84, C, a, 84003098 Fi"'t Coogregafional Church [Berkshire MRA], Main St, Berkshire, 7/02/84, C, a, H4oo3101 Ford, Lebbeus, House [Berkshire MRA], Jewell Hill Rd" Berkshire, 7/02/H4, C, H4oo3104 Owego Central Historic District, North Ave., Park, Main, Lake, Court, and Fronts S~" Owego, 12/03/80, A, C, 80002780 Platt-Cady Mansion, 18 River St., Nichols, 8113/76, C,76ooI286 Royce, Deadatus, House [Berkshire MRAj, NY 38, Berkshire, 7/02184, C, H4oo3109 Royce, J B" House and Farm Complex [Berk, shire MRA], NY 38, Berkshire, 7/02/84, A, C, 84003111 Tioga County Courthouse, Village Park, Owego, 12/26172, A, C, 72000915 US Post Office-Dwego [US Post Offices io New York State, 1858-1943, TR], 6 Lake St., Owego, 5/11/89, A, C, 88002391 US PaS! Office-Waverly [US Post Offices in New York State, 1858-1943, TRj, 434-348 WaverlySt., Waverly, 5/11/89, A, C, 88002444 b 1 if ji I' ;J- " ,l; !~ " ,. l.~ ~r U /' :j ;.: t I j L OCT 21 '97 10: 26 TOWllIiF SOUTHOLD BUILDING.STRlJCTUIr INVENTORY fORM P.2/5 FOR OFFI SE ONI. Y I>IV/SION FOR HISTORIC PRESERYAlIOrl: NEW YORK STA lE PARKS AND RECREAnON Al.BANY. NEW YORK /51~) 474.0479 UNIQUE SITE NO. QUAD Sf RIES NEe. NO. OR-7 YOUR NAME To"," of SouthoJd/SPLTA DATE: lAn",.ry lQRR YOUR ADDRESS: Town HaJJ. Main Rd TELEPHONE: ~11i 71i~ 1Rq7 Southold, LI, NY 11971 ORGANIZATION (if any) Southold Town Conunllnity n"ve]opmpnt OffiC'P . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IDENTIFICATION I. BUII.DING NAM[(S): 'J:Inw""',lYl'lung JIm"... 2. COlJNTY: Suffnlk TOWN/CITY: Snllthn1rl VILLAGE: n;~~nt 3. STRI:ET LOCATION: SE COrner MAin Rd. (NYS R;~. ,~) ann Pl"tt __ 4. OWNERS/fJP: a, publIc 0 n private Gl S. PRESENT OWNER: K1ni . ADDRESS:Bm( 74~ Grppnpnrt 1,1 11944 fl. USE: Onsinal: rp-~iden~,:t Present; rtudn~nl""::& 7. ACCl~~SIUILlTY TO PlJBLIC: EXlerior visible from public road: Yes ~ No 0 Interior accessible: Explain pr;t'::.tp. ~.oe;~Al"If'O . DESCRIPTION II. C1LJI/.I)ING MATERIAL .. clapboa rd 0 e. cobblestone 0 b. stone 0 f. shingles ~ c. brick 0 g. stucco 0 . d. board and ballen 0 orher: f,. ~TRLJ('TURA1. SYSTEM: (if k",,,,,") a. wood frame with interlocking joints ~ b. woud frame with light members 0 c. masonry load bearing walls 0 d. melal (explain) e. olher. a. excellent If] b. good 0 c. fair 0 d. deteriorated 0 a. original sile 0 . b. moved 0 if so.whe,l" c. list lIIalor alter'lions .nd dales (if known): I(). CONDITION: II. INTEGRITY: Windows replaced, front dormer added. _____.12:..PIIOTO: ..r:e.g: KK IX-14, fm S 13. MAP; NYS DoT Orient uad '--, ...... '. , 0 ~.~ ~)"". ~:. ~. ...,,'1-.... X ,. ~~ 'i.:.' ,,'"\~ () ,. ~("..., , .1!olJ;..~. MI/JUt 1'~ ....,.~...~(..4~.--.. :.~~~ ,,61_ '.Vt~h~. "@~'" _-,,->.1 ~ ' :. .; . .",. . J ...... .:: ;" r~ .'0 M ~~ ",. 'O: .. '., ,.)~ .. ~ .. :;~z~;... 5 t __ ...--.' . ..'s ......,.ft.,~ a .\ -',.,;j" -t- ~:"'. O\:"j(v:II... .~~ . . .: .l;-. 'i~ 'f~JC~", '~.... ... .:" /1; .,~ ".. ...y ,,;~ ,J .".-, '\. - . ... ,." ~\... "- -(J '.,....'... .... _" le""",1 '\. . '('.~fi;~~~ "Ori(!,;t ..;~ :eUn ~\1 <1 _' .~:f:'lo... ,eO )I,.'.~: "V",j4r. . ~'i" ,.....~:!'l-..,--;,:'......-'?.,<':"..~...o. J!... " .:.,.:.\:'" ..... ""'" lr" ,. '~. ~'4' :;.. '.' .. .-i"-.......... ' .'. "'i \ . "~.~ '.<1".... 0......, u!"',......;:......:....., ". t.... 'ir..-P.- Y~("'CI...bC::-G,~....j... ~Jt . .... -.. . , ;:.~;;;..:-,~;i"....~:.,., ~ .!.) ~;;~c .oJ .. ,. N ~ t - i " . '.:.:i.~;.f_~f;~~~~?FJ!!!f'~,....>'J". .:::.:>~':~:.~' ~. .. . .. UP.l " ocr 21 ''37 10:26 TOWV SOUTHOLD . P.3/5 OR-79 14. THREATS TO BUilDING: a. nono known (i! d. de.elopers 0 f. other: K~lATW OUIIlUllDINGS AND PROPERTY' .. homO b. carriage house D.c. garage 0 d. privy 0 e. shed lil f. greenhouse 0 g. .hop 0 h. garden. 0 i. landscape reatures: j. other: !6. SURROUNDINGS OF THE BUilDING (check mOle than one if nocess.uy): , a. open land lCJ b. woodland 0 c. scattered building. 0 d. densely buill.up 0 e. commercial [iiJ light f. industrial 0 g. residential [iiJ h.other: b. Zoning 0 . c. loads 0 e. deterioration 0 . 15. J7. INTFRRElATIONSHIP Of BUILDING AND SURROUNDINGS: (Indicate if building or strUcture is in an historic district) House faces Platt Road in a low density agricultural area. A garage/serVice station ie located directly across Main Road from the houee. I~. ' OTIIER NOTABLE FEATURES OF BUILDING AND SITE (including int.rior features if known): ii-story, 4 bay, gable roof house with off-center entrance. Shed root porch across the front. l-story, single bay, gable roof wing on south. Cellar hatch on south with brick jambs. SI~NIFICANCE 19. DATE OF INITIA'- ('Or-;STRUCTION: Prior to 18'58. ARCIIlTECT: ...BlltlDER: ".,-....,..,.:..--' -., , I , . . . . ;l" ,..: ~.. .~;<r:'''' ~O. IIISTORICAI. AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPORTANCE: . . ',- .r:.. This house ap~ears to in 1873, and Young in It contributes to the' have been Brown-in 1858, Bower 1909.' ambience of this historio area. ~1. SOURCES: ,"r~-' Chace. Map. of Suffolk County. l8~' ~eers; Comstock. Atlas of Lon~ I81~d. 1873 E. Belcher Hyde. Atlas of sur o~k ounty. L.I. "'- Vol. 2. North Side. Sound Shore, ." 1909 1l. TH!: Mr. Form prepared by KUrt Kahofer, research assistant. .,. OCT 21 '97 10:27 TOW~ SOUTHOLD nUllf)ING.STl~UCTUR'?:"iNVENTOI(Y FORM FOR ~SE ONI.Y P.4/5 ! UNIQUE SITF. NO. QUAD SFRIES NUi. NO. ",. DATE: January 1988 IJR-8, IlIV/SION FOJ( IIlsrORIC I'IlESERV.\T101'O "'oW YO/ll< S1'.\ 1 E I'MlKS ANllllUIIL\ I ION .\I.II.\NY,N/.W YO'I" 1,'H147~,().17<) YOUJ( NAME Town of Southold/S"(,!A YOUR ADDRESS: Town Hall, Main Rd. TEl ''I'IIONl' 516 765 1892 'Soutfiolal..l NY U971---' .. ORGANIZATION (if ,"y):__~~~thold Town Community Development Office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IlJliNTlFICA llq~ I. IIt1l1.fllNG NAMFfS)' Anne lIop~ins Hous: _'_.. Z. COUNTY: Sul OIK TOWN/CITY: :;oiIT1i01CI I, S" REf'l' LOCATION: Platt .Rd., west side 4. ()WNERSlIll': ., punlic CJ h 1";Vl"o l!I ~. l'Ill'SENT OWNER Anne Hoek~,':':' (,. USI;: Origi".I' resid~nce 7 A('('ESSIIIII.JTY '10 l'UIIUl" VlllM;E: Orleilt- ADDRESS: 212 242 8152 Pr..enl: --!~sidence Exterior visible rrom puhlic w;td. YtS Ii) No CJ lnlcrihr ac.:n's~ih'C'. Expl:lifl priva!.!t...!!!..~dence !!L.~rRIl~rl()N H, 111'11 IlI'I(; MA'II.JIIAI. il. d"l'ho;II(I f~' c. (.'ohhlcslont. I] h, sinn" n r. ,h'flfo"" [I c. h.i,k r: I g. s'uc.:co r] d. hU:lrd ;wd h:llIcn 0 olhe. .c:omposi tio~hingle OJ. STIW('TlllIAI. SYSTHI. fil'l.:IIt""") :I. wuud fr:mu''' with hltl~rluckin!~ju;lIh K I h. Wllotl ham\.' willi lil~hr 1II"l1Ihl."'i 1)( C. I1IJ'l:ullry to:lll he;Hill}.; walls [.I d. me'i11 fl.""JJlain) e. other __.......____..__ '.....___.~ ;1 \,"xl'dl,,'II' K f h. Aoo,r (', ..'. fai, I , Ii ;i;~'('ljtl'all'tl ,., .1. t1fi,~init' sik t.l h. fI1o......d K I il .~n.wllC:II.' (;. 1967 J f com schoo l \,,':. li~t m:ljur al'tn:IUolfs ;1IIt.! (bfl.'s (if kJIll\\'II) grounos-on M;;].n l<a.. SOllth wing, dor.m~r, and elll:rnllC(' !;toop nddc,d. III (,OI'OII/TIOI-/' " r:-;I/(;llIIY: I!, "1I0TO: Neg: KK IX-13, fm. NE NYS DOT Orient quad 1.1. MAP, ---- " ., I /..... \./. ~"'. .........~:...:.. f~.. ~ . . '.,,~ \ , t............,. A:' '. :..,' '~., ..-J:l..: ~lr..... ~d 'r..' v " .(",4."....... . ..': . .~f.) v': . ('!,.: '~t.. .,.' '--~. ....~./' 1\.. .,. ," "'1t .....~. "'!':' . \'('M'''"~' '.,' ""&' t':,~,. ..,... ". .,.... !'. ":.. l.f'J.'~ ".0 's;:..:. .... :. .~. .. : I.... -. '\ ,. . ., 1/. J' '. .t" ',., ' .fA ,) ~. L'}'..q' ,....-..,...~"i':p..,q. 0 e\. \";1 .' ."< 4'., ~~: ~:;}r~"'i ..,~~.~~~._.;~... ~..l ~ :. '., \. \r."....1 "'i: . . ( ~'.,.... . l.'~'j,.... .()rh'nt'r:~:"'" i....oI/. , ..... iI." -.: ....:.Ir;,.~: "If ,.,,' JJ .}'!,.~.,!... ",' ~ . .t;.N""n" I..' ". .i'" .~:., ',' , · 0' <!:' ,. .... 'J"" ~.. ... ILl ...., oS- \"'"jit .. , .....,. 0.....,' IJ~ ..':-s!;~ ..~~.. ~ t..~ ...~ .(,.ICI"h.:e"4'.....~~ .w.! " ." ., "...~. ":". , '. 't:;~;";."'a; \.f)r...... "'. ".,~1;. ;i ......~:,t:... " ....:;: _. ~ ,'0":.. ..,t';o. "," \ .'" ~- ., " ...-' , ~ Ii ':/',;- '.. '. tU'l . OCT 21 '97 t t_...- _... .' ..... 10: 28 .TOWW, ~OU.~HO~~ . P.5/5 . OR-SO 14. ',' ....\...-".. :''"'';", I ',..,' ..,'.. .. ".1. .! '.... '. '." . . : ~~ .' "~"~<;'J ,I' /::~ ,~,~,: , TIIREATS TO BUILDING: '."~.~onc known ~ '. .' , .: ". d. de.clopers 0 f. other: RlLATED OUTllUILDINGS AND PROPERTY: . .. barn 0 b. carria,e house O. . c. aaraae 13 . d. privy 0 e. shed I!!.J f. gr..ohouse 0 g. .hup 0 h. sarden. 0 i. landscape features: j. othe" .' . . ',"-;" SURROUNOINGS OF TilE BUILOING (check mOle Ihan one if necessary): ',." . . . :: =t~e~:~d ~Idings t:J woodland 0 .. ". ,.<,;~}:\:-;:!S',;.":;""~ d. densely buitt.up 0 e. commercial 0 ... .' f. indu.trial 0 g. residential ~ '. . '.; >.ii:i:\ ,".... ..; h.other: ... ~:'V~~.':I::o:':~_.': -, ,.. ,.... . ; . <.(:'!~: ~jr<. " >-,' . -~ ,! ",:~ '.' '" '" >!;;:.:;~ b. zoning 0 c. roads O' . c. deterioration 0 . . :'. "'c:)':; ;.~~ ::,,:):tiii .:,' J IS. .f.... r.,:- .,. ~.~7;:'.1:: .;,,/:~t.~~~: 16. 17. INTI;RRElATIONSWP OF BUILDING AND SURROUNDINGS: (Indiule If building or structure i. in an historic di.trict) ',' : ',"- ,- '" Located in a low density residential area south of Main Rd., ." predOlJllinantly open land surrounds the house. " Ill. OTIIER N01'AIlLE FEATURES OF IIUIlDING AND SITE (including iniclior r..hlTes ifknown): 1\ story, 3 bay, side entrance plan, gable roof house with off center chinmey. Shed roof dormer. 2/2 windows. Large, 2 story, gable roof wing on south. SIGNIFICANCE I'). DATE OF INITIAL CONSTRUCTION: Early 1600's (1) ARCfIITEC'T : 1l11ILl}J:R: 10. HISTORICAL ANI) ARnilTECTlIRAL IMI'ORTANCE: , \ At its previous lo~ation on the school grounds, this house was the home of thd school principle. 21. SOURCES: Interview, Mrs. William Terry, 3/11/66. 323-2636.' f n. THlMF: Form prepared , I .... ...... _._40._ ... ._. ~ by Kurt Kahofer, research assistant. I i '. -4 OCT 21 '97 10:25 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . facsimile TRANSMITTAL Date: 10/.211'11 MaJHWJ Pa.cA~ To: Fax #: 5tf3 - 221 J Re: NVj kiq Pages: r- CInc:Iudlng ~ cowrI . P.l/5 #, ~;;-fJJ From: VaAeJvi L- SoICoId Town PlannIng Board 53095 MaIn Rd. P.O. Box 1179 SouthokI. NY 11971 Pt1ane: (518) 765-1938 Fax t1: 15161 765-3136 . . fREUDENTHAl IX ElJKOWHIZ CONSUL IHNG GROUP. HNC. ;~8" Vd(,f.<~II'" M"!~'I"f'i,'11 il.i~"~W'1J " C.omm"w~, N~"w YorL. 11725 IMPORTANT FAX TRANSMISSION 1,.1, (:;16) '.."""22 F.n;; (:~IR) tj.!W,,5fJ2H PLEASE DELIVER PROMPTLY ~.~ )x~ TO: FAX NO: FROM: SUBJECT: to/al!"!; MESSAGE'p .u e. ~/hL.s, DATE: This transmission consists of ;;; pages, including this COVel" page. Original will , will not 4- follow by mail. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: This transmission is a privil"'oled and confidential communication to an intended recipient. Any dissemination ot'this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication and are not the intended recipient, please iUUllcdiatcly notify us by telephone, collect if necessary, for instructions to facilitate the return of this conununil'utinn. 2/94 . ~ 'ilUfFOl.t tl ~.~~.. => :;...\ ;l Q :-<'>.,,1 rI> '2efJ ~ J;:!fJ ~. .. ""N ~4tOj-:::-~~~~ ^, ~{!Y . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 :'.lain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 10, 1997 Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Rd. Melville, NY 11747 Re: Proposed site plan for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Orient SCTM# 1000- 18-6-5 Dear Mr. Voorhis: Enclosed please find a copy of the Positive Declaration for the above mentioned site plan. Please contact this office in regard to setting up a Scoping Session. Sincerely, y~~. Valerie Scopaz Town Planner enc. ~ _.~.- . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARDG. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 10, 1997 Matthew E. Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Hwy. Com mack, NY 11725 Re: Proposed site plan for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Pachman: Pursuant to my conversation with Jean today, attached is a letter that supersedes one mailed to your office, also dated November 5, 1997. The letter in error states it is Re: Proposed site plan for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - Mattituck; when it is in fact regarding the Orient location. Please accept my apology for this clerical error. Sincerely, '1r(aJib.a. a r Martha A. Jones Secretary enc. . . 5 thold Town Planning Board 13 November 3, 1997 oth involved agencies. The Bell Atlantic project is expected to have a pote ial significant impact particularly in view of site sensitivity regarding the fol wing issues: The proje is located within an agricultural community that includes the historic ha et of Orient. The proposed project may impair the unique visuai and historica haracteristics of this area, which is zoned Low-Density Residential. R- ,a two acre district. Also, the proposed project iies in close proximity to the rient Village Historic District. which is on the National Register and has en since 1976. Due to the inherentsual contrast between the community's unique historicai and rural aes etic character and that of an 85 foot tall cellular telephone antennae, an the Town's economic reliance on this unique historical and aesthetic cH racter, the impact of the proposed tower is likely to be significant and detri ntal unless substantially mitigated. Further, a tower on the projec site would be visible from the Town's Seaview Trails network, speciflca y the North Fork Trail and the Narrow River Trail. These two trails follow exist g State and local roads, and were specifically chosen for their outsta ding scenic attributes. The Sea view Trails concept was initiated in 1994. It co sists of a network of bicycle, boating and hiking trails within the Town of S uthold, Finally, the project site's scenic value is derscored by the fact that it lies within the viewshed of SR 25 and Narrow iver Road, both of which are being studied under the Town's Scenic By ys Corridor Management Study which is currently underway, Funded by th State of New York, this stUdy will develop a management program to prote t the viewshed from these roads, The Southold Town Planning Board has determin that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared in order to provide a means to access the significance of the impacts of the project. to obtai input from involved agencies and the community, and to research possi e alternatives and mitigation measures. the motion? Mr. Ward: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. -. Matthew Pachman: My name is Matt Pachman, of Pachman, Pachman and Brown, attorneys for the applicant. Mr. Chairman and members of the . . Southold Town Planning Board 14 November 3. 1997 Board, as this Board is aware, the application was originaliy filed with the town in December of 1996, After a coordinated review, this Board requested an expanded Part Iii which was targeted to certain issues. That expanded Part III was submitted to this Board in June of 1997, Since that time, the only additional comments that the Town's environmental consultants raised were with respect to the two houses which appeared on the SPLiA blue inventory forms and I have our environmental consultant here tonight who I wouid like to comment on that. Given that, I respectfully believe that the only reasonable determination from this Board is that the criteria for significance have not been met and that a Negative Declaration should be issued. I would ask with the Board's permission that I have an opportunity to call Theresa Elkowitz, who is the applicant's environmental consultant to speak up to those issues. Ms. Elkowitz, if you could please start off giving your background and a brief rendition of your curricuia vitae to the Board, and then commenting on the SEQRA process and on the historical house question that was raised by Mr. Voorhis in his last report. Theresa Elkowitz: As Mr. Pachman said, my name is Theresa Elkowitz. I am the Chairman of the Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality. I'm a private environmental consultant and I'm a principal of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, I'm also a member of the Suffolk County Historic Trust. i serve as the Village Planner for the Village of Manor Haven. I've been a special consultant to the Village of Sands Point and have testified before many Boards in Nassau and Suffolk counties and in Westchester. There are a couple of issues that were raised here, and as Mr, Pachman said, we prepared a visual impact analysis that was submitted to the Town in January of 1997, Never in any of the commentary that we have seen from Mr. Voorhis has that visual impact analysis been referenced or acknowledged. We prepared and submitted a Part I Environmental Assessment Form in April 1997, Mr. Voorhis raised several issues and recommended to this Board that a Part III Environmental Assessment Form be prepared. That Part III was very comprehensive and it spoke to the purpose and need for the project, the public need, the methodology for the selection of the site, the determination of the monopole height, potential land use conflicts, visual impacts again, as well a cumulative impacts to public health, land use and visual resources. The only issue that has been raised subsequent to that is this issue about potential historic houses. And what Mr. Voorhis raised was the Bower-Young house which is allegedly situated at the southeast corner of Platt and Rt. 25, . . Southold Town Planning Board 15 November 3. 1997 And the Ann Hopkins house which is, as he says, possibly located on the west side of Piatt Rd. And it took until October 9 for these issues to be raised, when this application, as Mr. Pachman told you, was submitted on December 6, and we started submitting SEQRAinformation in January 1997. With regard to these two alleged historic resources, I have correspondence and a report from J. Lance Mallamo, who is a historic preservation consuitanLif I couid bring this up to the Board...and he's also the Suffoik County Historian. And I'm not going to stand before you and read this entire report, but there are a couple of passages that I would like to read to you Specifically with regard to the Bower-Young house, Mr. Mallamo states and I quote, "The structure has apparentiy been modified many times over the years and the original design and architecturai features have been compromised by the addition of a large dormer wing and new windows." He goes on to talk about how this house has been altered and how it does not have historic integrity. Then he speaks to the Ann Hopkins house, and he states, "An oral interview undertaken nearly a decade ago claims that this structure was moved to this site from a previous location on the Orient school grounds. While this assertion has not been substantiated, the structure does not appear at this location on 19th century maps." And he goes on to explain how moved structures are generally ineligible for historic designation. If you read the October 9 letter from Mr. Voorhis, and I must say to you I have professional respect for Mr. Voorhis, It relies on a SPLlA - Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities - blue inventory forms for these two houses. And Mr. Mallamo states "The reliance of historic preservation policy on the identification of potential historic sites identified by SPLlA is uninformed and somewhat misleading. The SPLlA inventory has no official status in and of itself, and functions solely as a preliminary information source. " And then he goes on to explain what it takes to become a designated historic resource, not only in this Town but also on the national and state registers. He concludes, "Based upon the above, the erection of the proposed cellular communications faCility at the 2450 Main Rd. location, especially in the form of a silo or bell tower, will have no effect on documented cultural resources." Which brings me to another point. Something was said In that resolution that Bell Atlantic Mobile never offered mitigation and it would have adverse . . South old Town Planning Board 16 November 3, 1997 effects on the agricultural resources. Bell Atlantic Mobile both and writing in the Part Iii EAF and in extensive testimony in several hearings before the Board of Zoning Appeals, offered a siio, offered a bell tower, offered landscaping, and none of this appears to have been recognized in that resolution. Before I conciude, there are criteria in SEQRA, under 6 NYCRR 617.7 that set forth criteria for determining significance, And while I'm not going to go through every one of those criteria, I implore you as a Board, independently to review those criteria and make your own conclusion as to whether or not the erection of this pubiic utility structure would truly warrant a Positive Declaration and an environmentai impact statement, especially when the SEQRA documentation has been before you for nine months, Thank you very much. Mr. Pachman: Mr, Chairman, I would ask that that report that was submitted be made part of the record. Mr. Orlowski: It is. Any other comments? (CHANGE TAPE) Freddie Wachsburger:." the tower would look like, taken from the field by the Peluzo house. The photograph on which it's based are these. It's just a sort of fragiie arrangement here but if you wanted to just have a look. That's looking towards Rt. 25 from the field behind the projected site of the tower. That's based on an 85 foot tower, I also wanted to enter into your record, photographs from Tabor Road, Narrow River Road, Platt Road and the Main Road, which i think indicate more cleariy than those submitted in the third part of the EAF, the general characteristic of the scenery there of the lack of tree cover and the general flatness. I won't be lengthy but I would like to address the comments that were just made. It is covered In the document that I submitted to you on Friday, but it seems to me that there are four specific criteria under SEQRA of substantial impacts which are definitely refiected in this application and as you know the SEQRA regulations are very clear that the requirement for an EiS depends only on the recognition of at least one significant adverse environmental impact, and I think we can clearly show four, And it also says that to determine that an EIS will not be required for an action - this is 617.7 that was sited - to determine that an EIS will not be required for an action, the lead agency must determine either that there will be no adverse environmental impacts or that the identified adverse environmental impacts wiil not be significant. Clearly what you have just read as part of your resolution and clearly what has been submitted in the Voorhis report, shows that the impacts are . . Southold Town Planning Board 17 November 3, 1997 significant indeed. And so since this was a question just now I'd just like to refer to a couple of very specific ones. 617.7 C-4 - The creation of a material conflict with the community's current pians or goals as officially approved or adopted. Well, that one's obvious. What you were just talking about, it conflicts with the stated (inaudibie) of the Master Plan, it conflicts with the initiative for the Scenic Byways, it conflicts with the purchase of development rights to preserve the rurai quality of the farms. So, i won't go into the whole discussion there, but that one is obvious. The second one that is obvious is 617.7 C-5, the impairment of the character of quality of important historical. archaeological. architecturai or aesthetic resources, or of existing community or neighborhood character. I believe, and I'm speaking now as President of the Historical Society also, and as a retired archeologist, so i have some background in the historical aspect of this. But what I really wanted to address is the aesthetic resources of the existing community or neighborhood character. All the communities of Southold are very special and the people in each of then, from what I've seen, are totally dedicated to the preservation of their place. The people of Orient are totally dedicated to their environment. It's of profound importance to the residents of Orient and they care very, very deeply about it. There is no question that the erection of this tower in this area would seriously impact the neighborhood character, the existing community character. There is absolutely no question about that, and that's clear from the photographs. And I mentioned in the document that I gave you, the quotation from Tony Hiss's experience of place, which says the first ten percent of degradation in an area creates fifty percent of the loss of the experience of place. The second 10 percent creates the whole destruction of the sense of place. This initial thing would be that serious in its creation of the degradation percent of place of Orient. So, those are two very significant ones. The substantial change in the use of land, including agricultural. open space, and recreational resources, that's obvious, that's 617.7 C-8. Even the most important I think is 617.7-2, the lead agency must consider reasonabiy related long term, short term, Indirect and cumulative impacts. One of the most serious things about this decision and why I feel the Positive Declaration is so essential here is the precedent will be set not only by . . Southold Town Planning Board 1B November 3, 1997 putting the tower in a residential agricultural area, no only setting a precedent from that point of view, but the very piece of the FCC regulations and the piece of the telecommunications act of 1966 which demand that there be no discrimination among providers. The push to create enumerable telecommunication systems is well documented. The FCC fact sheet itself, which was published a year ago, says that communities in the coming year or two can expect four to eight providers in every community which means there are four to eight competitors possibly coming into Southold Town. This is what we have to anticipate. And we know that, we're told that, is that towers need to be approximately a maximum of six miles apart. If you Imagine four or eight providers each with their own towers because although we can talk about pole location, the FCC fact sheets themselves say that for the most part providers do not want to co-locate because of the competitive nature of the business, number 1, and number 2, each co-location requires another 15 feet and another 400 or 500 feet of building on the ground, so it's not really a solution. So, we imagine all this competition coming in and we cannot discriminate among providers means that any permission that's given to one provider will have to be given to others, which means that we could have not one of these towers in a farm field in Orient, but four or eight. And not only in Orient, but in farm fieids elsewhere in town. So the cumulative effect of the decision that's made on this is crucial. For all of these reasons, i want to compliment the Board on their decision and thank you very much on behalf of the Orient Association and people of Orient for your decision of the Positive Declaration. And I did just want to mention this - I know I gave you copies of - this request here that was fuifilled by Bell Atlantic for a DEIS of approximately 400 pages for a 100 foot communication tower that was erected in a clover leaf on the Southern State Parkway. I can't imagine that Bell Atlantic, having prepared a 400 page DEIS, and certBinly we don't need anything like that here, but a 400 page DE IS for a cellular tower on the Southern State, I can't believe that they would say that that's more deserving than a tower in a rural farm field in a historic community like Orient. Thanks very much, Mr. Orlowski: Thank you. Any other comments? Ann Hopkins: I'm sorry but i can't resist correcting the record. My name is Ann Hopkins and I am the owner of the house that was referred to as the Ann Hopkins, although I don't think of it. and most of my neighbors don't. They think of it possibly as the Vail house or by other names of its long . . Southold Town Planning Board 19 November 3, 1997 history and it is indeed on the west side of Platt Road. Directly it is 380 feet in on Platt Road so therefore absolutely on the line with the proposed tower. It was built by the best estimates of historical people who have visited it, around 1820, and was indeed moved and I can certainly provide documentation of that. But i'm puzzled that my house and one other was singled out because Gordon Price has a house of equal historic importance about 10 feet from the proposed tower and there is another one nearby, so I therefore am speaking in full support of the Positive Deciaration and the way it was worded. Mr. Oriowski: Another comment? Ted Rock: My name is Ted Rock and I live in Orient. I would just like to comment on the distinction in the two determinations here. In Mattituck I noticed you said extensive documentation of need was provided and I didn't hear that statement in terms of the Orient tower. And my question throughout this process has been, can they document their need? There was a statement by the environmental consultant about community need. I'm not sure what that is since there's not even a cellular communications black out underneath the tower, but i also commend the Positive Declaration specifically in site of the fact that there has been no documentation of need presented. Thank you. Gwen Schroeder: i just have a brief statement. I'm Gwen Schroeder from the North Fork Environmentai Councii (NFECJ. The NFEC strongly recommends that the Planning Board give a Positive Declaration to this application. We have reviewed the report of Nelson, Pope and Voorhis concerning the iong EAF on this project. It seems very clear to us that since Voorhis sited several environmental impacts which are inevitable with this project, a Positive Deciaration must be made. The SEQRA law states that only one such impact is sufficient to require a draft EIS. The Orient Association's statement is very thorough and we support it's recommendations. We would like to emphasize the fact that there are severai aspects of this proposed project which do not fit the objectives in the Town's Master Plan papers. It is very important to hold whatever philosophy the Town has in regards to it's plan. It seems to us that here, in the eariy stages of this effort, it is the time to do it. Thanks. Mr. Oriowski: One more comment. I think that all the comments are running along the same lines and we do have the motion on the floor, but we'll entertain one more. . . South old Town Planning Board 20 November 3. 1997 Gordon Price: I'm Gordon Price. My house is directly in front of the proposed tower, within 100 feet of my lot line. The original part of my house was built in 1830. It is not on the historical register, but my house is one of half a dozen that are in that same area as you can see by some of those photographs which are directly effected by the possible erection of that tower. Now, not only is it offensive from a standpoint of visual impact to the community, but it is a direct negative effect on the equity vaiue on a half a dozen houses within its range. I would say conservatively that the value of my house, if that tower is erected as planned, the value of my house would be decreased by 25 or 30 percent, and that's conservative. I just urge you to think about what this impact would be on not only the whole community but the residents, the owners of the six or seven houses, or eight or ten houses that are directly effected by the possible erection of the tower. Thank you. Mr. Orlowski: One more comment? Harold Watson: I'm Harold Watson from Orient Point. In terms of mitigation, there is one thing that I really think that you could look into or ask of Bell Atlantic. There are other technologies of which Bell Atlantic is very familiar. have done work for telecommunications companies, AT&T, NYNEX and now Bell Atlantic, and I have helped introduce the technology and marketing programs over the last ten years. So I do have some knowledge of what's out there. In Boston, they have been mounting small shoe box size boxes on the sides of buildings. It's a very successful trial in Boston; it's what they've been doing in Europe, because they don't want all the towers. In European villages and in Boston and in other places in urban areas, they are mounting small boxes on the sides of buildings and on telephone poles that essentially requires a lot more maintenance and more boxes, but It can do very similar things. And I think in terms of mitigation, I would specifically ask them to explain that technoiogy to you because that could be put into existing telephone poles without the same kinds of problems. Walter Smith: I'm going to change the tune a little bit. When NYNEX was here before, I specifically asked them about grounding for the towers. I asked them if they were copper plates, and they specifically said that they were copper and they were copper plates. Now having done a lot of work with trace metals it's interesting to point out that copper, in the book I edited 'Culture Marine and Vertebrate Animals' on page 298 (inaudible) says, . . Southold Town Planning Board 21 November 3, 1997 as a general rule, all metal, particularly copper must be avoided in any situation (inaudible) growing of invertebrate animals. And then I testified against the Shoreham plant and of course they rebuffed it but amazingly they agreed that metal copper can be extremely toxic to marine life. Coming back to another project that we had, and that was in Goose Creek a number of years ago. We were studying what happens to the material in the ground water, where it comes out. To do that we put (inaudible) in cesspools all along the shore on Goose Creek. In four weeks that material was out in the bay. Now they're going to have big copper plates on these towers that's going to leach out into the bay that's going to cause havoc with out marine life. There's no ands or ifs about it. Right now we have a tremendous change going on. For some reason or other we're getting a very significant sea levei rise. Now, if some people in Orient who only had sump pumps going a few hours a day, some are going 24 hours a day, and that's due to sea level rise pushing the water up through their basements. So, we have to be very careful of anything that we put into the environment because it's going to get out in the bay sooner or later. So if we don't watch and take a stand now against this sort of thing, we're going to be in great trouble. And the way it works, it either kills the larvae on the fish, it gets on their gills and that's going to kill them. So we have to be very, very careful of anything that we're going to put into our groundwater, and these copper plates _ copper is one of the major toxins for our marine environment. We avoid it like the plague. You remember when they used to put the copper coating on the bottom of boats? That's been banned because of the effect it has on marine life. So what we really have to do Is control these phallic symbols of the people and stop corporate greed, that's the only word I can express it to you. But the copper must be looked at and I don't think we should avoid it and perhaps have in-depth studies done because very little has been done on this migration. We do know it migrates Into the bay or into the sound and is going to cause a lot more problems - perhaps not in my generation, but in yours and your childrens, so we have to be very careful in what we're putting into the ground, in particular things like copper plates. Like we took some of the Insecticides out and some of the pesticides and we're dealing in part per billion not part per million, So we have a major problem here and I think it's something that should be looked at very, very carefully. Thank you. Mr. Orlowski: Thank you. . . Southold Town Planning Board 22 November 3, 1997 Ellen McNeely: This will be quite brief. I want to thank you for the Positive Declaration. I don't know if any of you read the Times today, but it refers to cellular towers as vertical real estate. And cellular towers do provide, as we know, major economic benefit to their owners and the sites are major revenue producers which is why they got the designation of vertical real estate. Like any real estate development, it must meet certain zoning requirements (inaudible) if you concede it as a real estate development. Although Bell Atlantic would like us to deal with their proposed tower solely as a public utility, and them as guardians of a public service, the fact is that they are only one of a number of potential service providers and can gain significant economic advantage if they are in place first. Location, location, location. South old is being asked to permit Bell Atlantic to entrench itself to reap these benefits in its competitive environment without being held accountable for its effect on ours. Our zoning IS critical and so is the SEQRA review process, crucial to any real estate development with significant environmental impacts. It is our interests, not theirs that shouid be the primary concern and it seems that it would be appropriate to solicit bids from the various communications providers to ensure that we get the most benefit, the best technology with the least environmental impact, and the first step you have taken which is to declare a positive impact. Thank you. Mr. Pachman: Mr. Chairman, would I have an opportunity to see the computer renderings that were submitted? Mr. Orlowski: Yes. Mr. Pachman: And these are the photographs? If I may just look at these also? Mr. Orlowski: Sure. Do you have any other comments now? Mr. Pachman: If I could just have a moment to review this. Well, Mr. Chairman, what I would say, members of the Board, is that Bell Atlantic Mobile submitted certain visual computer generated renderings back in, probably May. I would ask that this motion be tabled until only the next meeting so that we may have the opportunity to review this and comment as we see appropriate. . . Southold Town Planning Board 23 November 3, 1997 Mr. Orlowski: Is that your only comment? Mr. Pachman: Well, I would also like to have an opportunity to review the record of possible other comments with respect to some of the statements that were made here tonight. I think that certainly would be reasonable. I think that the Board should consider that before issuing a Positive Declaration. Again, especially since our submissions were made back during the spring, certainly no iater than June of this year, except for the (inaudible) additional comment which was made by the Town's Planning staff and environmental consultant which was in respect to two houses in the SPLlA forms which we addressed earlier. Mr. Orlowski: Well, the Board has reviewed a lot of comments and have a motion on the floor, I'd like to proceed with the motion. (CHANGE TAPE) I think that as we go on to the DEIS and the scoping outline, a lot of these comments and questions can be addressed then. What's the pleasure of the Board? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Cremers: Mr. Chairman, I abstain again. Mr. Orlowski: Mr. Cremers abstains. OTHER Mr. Orlowski: Farmveu ssociates - Planning Board to authorize the Chairman to endorse a C ificate of Correction for this approved subdivision, SCTM# 1000- 1-3-2. *************** Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I'd Ilk to offer the following resolution. WHEREAS, the major subdivision 0 Farmveu Associates was filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on Sep mber 1,1989; and WHEREAS, a Certificate of Correction h been submitted by Werner Adel, Generai Partner of Farmveu Associates, t correct survey errors regarding SCTM numbers 1000-120-3-(83-8.8),8.24, B.25, 8.35, 8.36 and 8.37 [a,k.a. subdivision lot numbers 1-6,22,23.46.471 antJ.drainage areal as described in the Certificate of Correction; be it therefore . . MORT" FORK EMVIROMWEMTAL COUMCIL, IMC. Route 25 at Love Lane, PO Box 799, Mattltuck, NY 11952 516-298-8880 November 3, 1997 Memorandum to: Mr. Bennett Orlowski and Members of the Southold Town Planning Board Re: EAF: Bell Atlantic Application SCTM No. 1000-018-6-5 The North Fork Environmental Council strongly recommends that the Planning Board give a Positive Declaration to the above application. We have reviewed the report of the Nelson, Pope and Voorhis Firm concerning the Long EAF on the above project. It seems very clear to us that since Voorhis cited several environmental impacts which are inevitable with this project, a positive declaration must be given. The SEQRA law states that only one such impact is sufficient to require a Draft EIS. The Orient Association statement is very thorough and we support its recommendations. We would like to emphasize the fact that there are several aspects of this proposed project which do not fit with objectives in the Town's Master Plan papers. It is very important to hold to whatever philosophy the Town has in re its plan. It seems to us that here in the early stages of this effort is the place to do it. a non-profit organization for the preserv~tlon of land, sea, air and quality Of life printed on 100% recycled paper . PLAr.'NING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD November 5, 1997 .~. ~".~~t'oa~ '" ~,,/!~ %'\\ . is :"",\:\ Cf.> ~ ~ ~ . ~. """"'. ~Q./ + i-.:-o<:::J, . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Matthew E. Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Hwy. Commack, NY 11725 Re: Proposed site plan for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Pachman: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 3, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of significance, and grants a Positive Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Positive Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. g~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. . _--=z~~ ,;::,~~-.; \lfFOl v--~ . .'0 SS."" "G"~ -cc, .~ ~'" .'::= ~.... .; Q """"~. '~'. '" ~:~ . - 'I ::~. ~} ~~ ~"".~ ~O.i + "'~::'~ ~=.,;;-~ . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chainnan WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCillE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765~3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance November 3,1997 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Bell Atlantic, NYNEX Mobile, Inc. SCTM#: 1000-18-6-5 Location: S/S State Rt. 25, approximately 375 feet east of Platt Rd., Orient SEQR Status: Type I Unlisted ( ) (X) Description of Action: To construct a cellular telephone antenna 85 feet in height on .05 acres of a 10.54 acre parcel. . . Page 2 SEQR Positive Declaration - Sell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile November 3, 1997 Reasons Supporting This Determination: The applicant has provided the lead agency with a Long Environmental Assessment Form and a Part III. These documents have been reviewed by the Planning Board, the Planning Board's Environmental Consultant, and other involved agencies. The Bell Atlantic project is expected to have a potential significant impact particularly in view of site sensitivity regarding the following issues: The project is located within an agricultural community that includes the historic hamlet of Orient. The proposed project may impair the unique visual and historical characteristics of this area, which is zoned Low-Density Residential, R- 80, a two acre district. Also, the proposed project lies in close proximity to the Orient Village Historic District, which is on the National Register and has been since 1976. Due to the inherent visual contrast between the community's unique historical and rural aesthetic character and that of an 85 foot tall cellular telephone antennae, and the Town's economic reliance on this unique historical and aesthetic character, the impact of the proposed tower is likely to be significant and detrimental unless substantially mitigated. Further, a tower on the project site would be visible from the Town's Seaview Trails network, specifically the North Fork Trail and the Narrow River Trail. These two trails follow existing State and local roads, and were specifically chosen for their outstanding scenic attributes. The Seaview Trails concept was initiated in 1994. It consists of a network of bicycle, boating and hiking trails within the Town of Southold. Finally, the project site's scenic value is underscored by the fact that it lies within the viewshed of SR 25 and Narrow River Road, both of which are being studied under the Town's Scenic Byways Corridor Management Study which is currently underway. Funded by the State of New York, this study will develop a management program to protect the viewshed from these roads. The Southold Town Planning Board has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared in order to provide a means to access the significance of the impacts of the project, to obtain input from involved agencies and the community, and to research possible alternatives and mitigation measures. . . Page 3 SEOR Positive Declaration - Sell AUantic NYNEX Mobile November 3, 1997 For Further Information: Contact Person: Valerie Scopaz Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Southold Town Board Southold Town Building Dept. Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services Suffolk County Dept. of Planning Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works Suffolk County Dept. of Parks NYS Dept. of State, Coastal Resources & Waterfront Revitalization Division NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation - Albany & Stony Brook offices NYS Dept. of Transportation - Albany & Hauppauge offices NYS Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Applicant . . :5u..BF C'fl~-s. -ro P..b -r-"'Srf\PP The Orient Association P.O.Box 282 Orient, New York 11957 October 29, 1997 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Members of the Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: EAF:Bell Atlantic Application SCTM No. 1000-018-6-5 Dear Mr. Orlowski and Members of the Planning Board, My understanding is that your decision on November 3 will be limited to a determination of i~ -----" .......- ~ f?;i ',;0 [':2 . ~t~' ~ :;:100/ ~(IL?nJJ..D ~'[;;jtN,__1 i p~ ,''-':-'ii:;f"' fi{"'f)t) .."",';.:l;.~~~::;~",.J status under SEQRA of the application for a cellular tower in Orient. The Orient Association agrees with the conclusion of your consultants, Nelson, Pope and Voorhees, which states in part "The location of the monopole as proposed will result in significant land use, historical, and visual impacts.. . some mitigation is possible... (but) impacts will remain which cannot be mitigated, such as the loss of agricultural vistas from Platt Road and NYS 25. and the creation of a precedent for location of such structures within rural residential areas... if the Town feels that these represent substantial impacts, a positive declaration should be considered, and a Draft EIS prepared which includes an analysis of alternative sites and more fully discusses public need". As you know, SEQRA regulations (617.7 (a)) are very clear as to the circumstances for the determination of the requirement of an EIS: (l)To require an EISfor a proposed action, the lead agency must determine that the action may include the potential for at least one significant adverse environmental impact. (2)To determine that an EIS will not be required for an action, the lead agency must determine either that there will be no adverse environmental impacts or that the . . identified adverse environmental impacts will not be significant. It is my understanding that the law leans to a "low threshold" of determination; in other words, when in doubt, prepare an EIS. The present proposal meets at least four criteria which SEQRA (617.7 (c)) lists as indications of significant adverse impacts. 617.7 (c)(iv): The creation of a material cOliflict with a community's current plDns or goals as offically approved or adopted. The proposed tower site is in a field adjacent to farms preserved by the purchase of develop- ment rights under the Town's Farmland Preservation Act. The field is in the R-80 district, among the purposes of which, as defmed by the Master Plan, is to "provide the open rural environment so highly valued by year-round residents and those persons who support the Town of Southold"s recreation, resort and second home economy ". The vistas in Orient are significant to two additional programs: the Scenic Byways intiative will designate Rte. 25 and Narrow River Road, both of which will be negatively impacted; and Orient is included in the State's Maritime Heritage initiative. As your consultants report indi- cates, the tower would be visible from all of Platt Road and from Route 25, particularly west- bound; it would also be visible from Narrow River Road. The Voorhees report also indicates that mitigation will not eliminate the negative impact, and, indeed, it is obvious that even at maturity trees might rise to no more than half the height of the proposed tower. Even with a reduction of height and planting of vegetarion, "the agricultural vista across the property will be sign!ficantly altered". On the applicant's EAF part 2 (19), a potentially large impact-- "potential conflict with rural character of town" -- is acknowledged. . . 617.7 (c)(v): The impairment of the cluzracter or quality of important historical. arcluzeological. architectural. or aesthetic resources or of existing community or neighborhood cluzracter. As stated in the review by Nelson, Pope, and Voorhees, "the location of a tall communications tower within an agricultural field located in an historic, rural area does represent an inherent land use coriflict". The residents of Orient, both "old-timers" and "incomers", have a profound attachment to the rural landscape, the old-timers because of their roots and their connection to the land, the newcomers because it is the landscape they have chosen for their homes. Their committment to its preservation is total. Tony Hiss, in The Experience of Place, quotes an Environmental Protection commissioner: "The first five percent of development in a countryside region generally does fifty percent of the damage, in terms of altering people's mental geography of an area". The proposed tower would damage the rural landscape to at least that degree. Federal Communications Commission regulations (7 CFR Ch.1 (10-1-95) include as actions which may have a significant environmental effect (1.1307 (4)) Facilities that may affect dis- tricts, sites, buildings, structures or objects.. . that are listed, or are eligible for listing. in the National Register of Historic Places. Village Lane and adjoining streets, two blocks west of the site of the proposed tower, have been on the National Register since 1976. The Voorhees report cites houses on Platt Road which have been recommended for inclusion on the State and Federal Registers (the Hopkins house is indeed on the west side of Platt Road, at SCTM 1000- 018-20). Additionally, SPLlA lists houses on Rte. 25, including the home of Gordon Price, built in the first half of the last century and directly in front of the proposed tower. The tower would loom over these historic two-story homes, and dominate and destroy the agricultural vistas, both of which have been acknowledged by Southold Town as vital to the goals of the Master Plan and the other Town and State initiatives. . . 611.7 (c)(viii): A substantial change in the use or intensity of use of land includ ing agricultural, open space, or recreational resources. As stated above, the field in which the tower would be located is substantially contiguous to farms preserved by the acquisition of development rights and to residential properties. Not only would the rural landscape, a key element in the goals of Southold Town's Master Plan, be severely impacted, but the private homes in the vicinity would be seriously devalued. 611.7 (2): The lead agency must consider reasonably related long term, shon term, indirect, and cumulative impacts. In the applicant's EAF part 2 (19) it is acknowledged that the proposed action will set an important precedent for future projects; in part 3, cumulative impact is denied; but any denial is completely disingenuous, given the Telecommunications Act of Feb.8, 1996 (S.652) Section 704; (47 U.S.C. 332 (c)), which says that "regulation of placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilites by arry State of local govememtn or instrumentality thereof.. (1) shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers iff func- tionally equivalent services -. This means, in effect, that any privileges received by this applicant as to placement, height, and zone should not be denied competitors. The FCC anticipates from four to eight competitors in any area within the next couple of years, and there is no real incentive to co-locate. This proposal is the first application for a cellular tower in a rural, agricultural/residential location in Southold Town; the granting of permission of this application would enable both the erection of similar towers in residential zones elsewhere in Southold, and the erection of additional towers by competing providers in Orient. The fact that this application is being processed while new legislation governing cellular towers is being processed puts a particular burden on the Board. Any action which would have the . . effect of enabling the execution of this project as proposed would, because of the non- discrimination regulations in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, render meaningless the new legislation. 1 am given to understand that when the new legislation is passed, the environmental review of this application will probably not be repeated. If that is the case, it is essential to examine it most stringently now. In their reports, Nelson, Pope and Voorhis emphasize the inappropriateness of the proposed site for this facility. "A site with more adequate screening, existing buildings or trees, or more compatible with adjacent uses would be preferable... The location of the monopole as proposed will result in significant land use, historical and visual impacts.. . the project site is not a suitable location due to the open nature of the site and high potential for visual impacts ". They recommend a positive declaration.. "a Draft EIS... which includes an analysis of alternative sites and more fully discusses public need. Ideally, the project sponsor and the Town should work together to identijy a site which would minimize the environmental impacts associated with the proposed project... the Town has a clear interest in regulating the location of telecom- munication towers and in helping to identify optimal sites. " In conclusion, the Orient Association asserts that there is ample justification for a positive declaration under SEQRA guidelines; indeed, we feel that it would be difficult to argue that there were no significant adverse impacts, the only justification for a negative declaration. A positive declaration would fulfill SEQRA' s stated purpose of providing for public review and participation; such public review is warranted by the potentially severe negative impacts on the residents of Orient and, because of the non-discrimination regulations, on all of Southold Town, and the public has not yet had that opportunity. . . I append an article from the West Hempstead LIFE. Bell Atlantic prepared a several-hundred page Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a proposed 84 foot monopole in a cloverleaf on the Southern State Parkway. This reveals two important facts: first, the cellular tower issue is extremely serious, and towns and municipalities across the country are taking it very seriously. Second, Bell-Atlantic was apparently willing to acknowledge the right of the agency involved to request a DEIS. If a tower in a cloverleaf in Hempstead warrants a positive declaration, surely Bell-Atlantic cannot maintain that a proposal for a communications tower in a field in a historic, rural and residential community like Orient does not. Sincerely, ~cL~ . Freddie Wachsberger Chairman, Cellular Tower Committee . . ~C1H~ c... -r' .,>- ", I).. <? ~ 'J Z ::l 0 1. i: .s. ,-' '"1^ ,<'- 'VD Hfl' NEW YORK STATE PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION ~rhis is to ley(i!.>' tf,dl 0?Cenz1- ~~zZ-")7"i'c ZliJ-&iCc- Orien-S J~a t:bu~ J1eH/ f~ ill rel'Olllliti!.J11 of lis .7t~au: a~d?C~,(~t?czfu?d ,ii/IIIJ;l<llllf <lId (0 eH(Ollr<ll/l' it, 1>f'('\Ul'dtil'" 11'<1, li,(e,/ 011 the NATI()NAL REc/'.,TER (JF III'-T( l/W IJLf\CE'- hy the UNITED STA TES DEPA RT/vl ENT OF TH E INTERIOR 11POll II0millatioll by the State Historic Preserrllltioll Off,cer IIlIder provisiolls oj the Nlltiollld Historic Preserr>lItioll Act oj 1966. v~ .. t (1\1\11""11 "'ll. ,. \\' \ f 11(1., ... J \ II I' \1(11." \ "I I~ r ( It! \ J II l' "'\ II 111"1 tlllll l'tH "In.\ r tl" (II r II II~ 21 c71tay 15'76' ,;~",. ~'l,"f. .~t~J '~'lo ,,,'" -,\ ,................. 41'" '? -~-..~~ "...,~'t N~,y ot:......~'. ~ .~.. .,... "~~~', . t. t... ~,_ .~ '~~,.. ~.. :'i~, ';'';'1'I1,I''i',-\. ~ '\./.,' J" ''''''.'' ,< 0..,. '1.("',. :, ' ,,0, I "i'". " .. It " I,.. - I' "'f~ ., '::: ,~"l ,,.:: .-~ . ... ~.~ ,.,., ,'., 0::: :1-;"~ ,'\, ,t -\, .;':", z.,: "\, ''''...~. -JJ:'l-.1U,J'<'\."":'-~ .. ~ ., \..!l,.~. . (. ~ ':::0.. >!J"~ ...,........... ~'-~ ~ .'4...... /T{'1U t\~....ri'~ ~~~~p- c~ OG --- -- -~--.- -~ ',-<;4 ONE-MILE -~ - ~ ~ ---~ cf.i ~f1!P pJ(O If)I "-""0: ORIENT-LONG ISLAND T,{", ,It-OM'" of" 'j,:9YSTERPONDS' H [STOR! CA)':'pO CIET1~ ' ORG I-~ ' A.....IZl!!.D .':'li<-'ii~<~ ....,~~.~ ""- I-krocrl M.lIalc t..I~sigJlcd tWO pktLlriallllJj>s ufOrknl. one in 1935 and the one above (or lhe OilS in 1950. LH~er reprnl!w,':liullS uf bUlh Jn~ Jvailabk at lll~ Museulll. t\'lr. Hale rClircJ 10 Orient illu.1liveJ iu Ihe IWllSc shown JI page lOb. is: '"' ~ -.L....~ ~ ...,,;:,~ <l\--" g (, "S-l" ~ C?:? ;,;. s. I U ~- '-- :...~ &- ~ '.., - I' .,. __.:=. .:.~~ ":.. . -- - .. ;. ~ - " ,\;~ / ~ , ~ " , - "u'ln"'~I1' , : /,0 =l~/ '": "I I \. / -' ' ,I ~ ~ ~ .. r. ., ~ - -!.~ l- .;. '\ d ",1.111> .' . y~ ;. ~ ;. ! ~ ... " ~ . ., S ~ '; - " - '" ) ) .; '. '-- :::i ~ " ,,, ..; '.' , , , ' , 1 , , I, , , 1 , ", ~ i '< .." '" . . ....,~/'_" .........:~.,.,.7' ./01,.." . '-~ rn~._ " ,,~_;;-<t~. "..........,..... 7",;,~. " ". J I)'...... .... .......-":Jr.., ""-s.-. .c" .., , "..- " .~ '. ''9 ". ",;,~ .~ / """" -,~ .... J .. -", '*'P~ ". " .~. " 'DDwu,.."" . .........~:_, 05" ;-'. ....... "7~.x. ..,....~ .~"'............... "'?' ...... ('-... ~ ....... ... ~"'" ~=-~ ..... .;. ...........,...-~~-,~~,,;~.::. ,; ' "1tP;~ ';;"'"'~"""\; N . ~I '1";~!' ~ ~,,'" '-~~'<:. .~", - , \.~ -f.J:~ ~-~"--",--'" --..------, . I I I " .... .... c '" -'- - 0 -..: _. ~ :r: . >- . '" " .... r........ 0 0, .... -.. L... .... 0 ... " z ~~ ';":- ",0 , >- ~ " ~ , / / I - - - iI= - - I L /n~ I . - . ."" ~'.. :c: " ""'~ ',,~ 4~~"'.:."'.,( ,,~., . . f f' '~'4.. . '..;~ \I...~ ...\~'- 0(:7 .---, "ti:';- ....'~= ~~I! . \'\ 1l .\ .- ._.....::.~.! . -<( <</~ ~ <~'t'ii I('. ",_ ::-: .,.... ,1~ . " t ~ j/ I ~ f...~ o,.........u ~ : IT.rr,.,...~. / I / --"'l"U:1C.' lllfrlPY ",IJuUfJAft:1J. lp"''/:J'6uu;) ~""11'rI "10<'.0:' ' AI..m4~L ,..... .., ~ 1:1~ 7, ...:; ~ IU ~ ~....., ~ i a ~ <~,~ ~ ~\\i &.it 1\ ~ ~ no. ~ ~.~ : J -..r ,~' /."tl! /:/;/ 1 ',1 ~ rlC/flIrJ'....r t;J()ng 1I."vt!r ar~ :'- .. ~~'>' ... ~ '. . <; . , ,. '1. ~ ~ . - ,. ~ " ~ ., ,... '. l ~.. t&\W.I' I. ! . .1 -=-:;. ti ~.=. ~j ~._ -'1 ....\ ldt _:.1",1 ~\ J_' '1 '" I I ! , I ., ...; '. , , , , , , , , , , , .1 , .,.,~-,,, 'j .....hi I . I ,;.;. <"" .1-';.., '" -"/'""- ..~~~ -.' I"~, ..", ,:.t n,l~.J "<' ~ 4- \ ~- ,,\/ ., \. \' -t' ~ , ; . / '."'/""'."".':%' ,- 7,,-Hr~'l'j-71': ' ':/1;;..._ ' . '. r " ",';'I'~l! ".7.<--:.: I ~..;. i ..... ; . . THB NBW YORK TIMBS, M Vertical R Projected Growth for Wireless Services and High-: By ANDREA ADELSON The competition between televi- sion broadcasters and wireless com- munication services is giving rise to a Ilew sub-industry of tower compa- nies. They are vying to tie together far-flung clusters of local transmis- sion antennas into national webs that will bring next-generation technol- ogy to customers. Stunning growth projections for wireless services are drawing big- name investors to this infant indus- try. With outside investment capital nurturing their national ambitions, these little-known tower companies have been transforming themselves uver the last two years into integrat- ed operators that can offer wireless carriers an array of services from finding new sites to building towers [0 leasing antenna space on under- used radio towers. "It came from nowhere," said Bri- an G. Coleman, a wireless communi- cation analyst for BT Alex. Brown in San Francisco. Among the dominant players in the antenna business are American Tower Systems of Boston; Omni America Wireless L.P. of West Palm Beach, Fla.; Telecom Towers Inc. of Alexandria, Va., and the Castle Tow- tlr Corporation and the American Tower Corporation, both based in Houston. Demand for transmission towers and antennas is soaring. Driving the demand is the expected shift by the nation's 1,500 television stations to high-definition television and new Federal regulations that allow a handful of wireless services to com- pere in a single market. So far, just 3 percent of telecommunications traf- fic is over the current wireless net- work, most of that cellular phone conversations. But that is expected to change. Already, some of the new wireless services, called personal communications services or P .C.S., are operating, carrying not only phone chatter but Internet data and paging signals. The tower companies expect a near-term flurry of activity from broadcasters retrofitting or replac- ing their existing towers, sowcalled "candelabras" that can support a small cluster of television or radio antennas. A tall tower can be 2,000 feet and cost, on average, $3 million. Chris Pinello for Th~ New Yurk Times Carl E. Hirsch is the chief of Omni America, a leader in the industry. Even more capital is needed to meet demand from wireless services, whose tiny 2.2 million subscriber base is supposed to increase to 54.3 million in a decade, according to Paul Kagan Associates Inc., a media research firm in Carmel, Calif. That sort of consumer acceptance would require adding 80,000 P.C.S. antennas to the 20,000 already built over the last 15 years for cellular customers. P.C.S. antennas. at about $200,00 each, have a range of one to six miles and need to be only 200 feet in the air. By contrast, cellular an- tennas now are 6 to 12 miles apart. But the growing demand for antenv nas coincides 'with growing opposi- tion to them for esthetic and health reasons. An increasing number of municipalities have been imposing moratoriums on tower construction, even though part of the Telecom- munications Act of 1996 prohibits banning towers but does not address moratoriums. Tower companies are resorting to such costly "stealth" solutions as embedding antennas in clock towers, cemetery crosses and palm trees. Others are striking roof- top management deals, luring own- ers with the promise that every mul- . . Dl.:t JNDA I', NOVEMBER 3,1997 eal Estate , ~ Definition TV Is Bolstering Demand for Antennas deals that together cost $316 milliQli. The tower company is to be spunoif next year to shareholders of Ameri~ can Radio, which was sold to the Westinghouse Broadcasting Corpo- ration in September. The tower com- pany's pro forma cash flow is expect- ed to be $20 million this year and $35 million next year. "If as a company, we can coll- struet 30 big towers a year and geri.. erate a 25 to 30 percent return on our investment, that's a secure incorNe stream," said Steve Dodge, tfte chairman and chief executive of American Radio, who will hold tne same positions with the spun-pff company. .J> "You don't have to deal with per- sonalities, unions," he said. "Broad- casting is emotional; its mana~- ment intensive. By comparison, toW- 'I ers are deaf, dumb and mute. There are risks, though, like ca~l)- short customers and the unexpect%i, For example, General Wireless Inc. filed for Chapter II bankruptcy pro- tection last week, unable to pay ~pr the P.C.S. licenses it won in Govern- ment auctions. And earlier in the month, a new 2,000~foot tower und~r construction in Mississippi topplec;l, sending three employees of Le Blanc Communications Inc. of Canadatp their deaths. .1 But finding potential investors -w help bankroll acquisitions is no prob~ 'lem for tower companies. Telecom Towers, which owns- or manages 3,000 sites, has teamed up with Cox Communications Inc. Castle Tower, which bought the British Broadcast- ing Corporation's transmission sitas and has another 3,000 in the United State, is backed by two private Tn- vestment companies. The American Tower Corporation, which owns arid. operates 600 towers, was considerih'g a public offering until it found an equity partner in Clear Channel Communications Inc., a broadcaster. Mr. Dodge, who will receive $103 million in stock and options wh~n American Tower Systems is spun off, wants to rein in expectations f6r what is quickly becoming the darlil}g of investors. "The financial commu- nity is impatient to play this indus- try," he said. "People view it as,:a way to play the explosive growth in wireless." He cautioned, "This is a young business." Behind the Boom in Radio Towers St~ong growth projections for wireless services are drawing investors to (i'le radiO tower industry. Little-known tower companies are I.AJerlng Wireless carriers an array of services from finding new sites t,) le8sIr19 antenna space on underused radio towers. Number of Mobile Wireless Subscribers 58.3 million 1097 I11III 160.7 'IOC'/ ~ Number of P.C.S. Subscribers I I I I I _ $93.7 I I I . _______________________ ___---.J The New York Times '097 20m 2.2 million .. 54.3 ~ Total Wireless Penetration 1991 21.3 percent _____.53.2 2007 Total Mobile Wireless Revenue $33.8 billion 1997 2001 '~~w !,. :}i':lAssociates month, Omni America acquired a one-third interest in the Kline Iron and Steel Company in Columbia, S.C., one of the few companies that build tall towers. Mr. Hirsch learned first- hand the value of a well-sited tower as chief executive of a company that owned KJOY-FM in Los Angeles in 1985. "The hidden jewel was the tower site," Mr. Hirsch said. The region's coastal foothills create dead zones for cellular customers. As a result, KJOY's 150~foot tower in the Santa Monica Mountains near Beverly Hills became a prized relay point for cable and cellular providers. "That turned out to be a bonanza," Mr. Hirsch said. Tower revenue rose from $400,000 annually to $2 million before the station was sold in 1989. "We want to take advantage of inher- ited sites that are underutilized," he said. This is a tall order, considering that Omni America's sister compa- nies own 8 television stations and more than 400 radio stations. In just the last two years, Ameri~ can Tower Systems, a unit of the American Radio Systems Corpora- tion of Boston, has cobbled together 920 antennas in more than a dozen tistory building will become a reve. l1ue-producing cell site. Given the zoning hurdles, compa- nies with existing towers are likely to prosper nrst. "Most wireless carri- ers wOllld like to go out and lease 40 towers in a region rather than con- tacting 40 different landowners," Mr. Coleman said. Anthony S. Ocepek, chief operating officer of Omni America, said, "Our goal is to be in all phases of the business." The company is being backed by $100 million from Hicks, iHuse, TalC & Furst Inc., a Dallas investment firm with interests in ra- dio and television stations. After four years of trying, con- struction is about to start on Omni America's first 1,220-foot tower. It will provide digital television signals t"or Milwaukee's two public broad- casting stations. When completed in 1999, the $7 million tower will be able to support l:.! television stations, 14 FM radio stations and 35 wireless ~('rvices_ But it will not fill up for ~lbuur eight years, Mr. Ocepek said. "'W,.. think of it as vertical real estate, a vertical shopping mall," :;,dd Ca I E. Hirsch, chief executive or' Urnn /\lllerica, which also owns (UWl'fS II Florida and Ohio. l.ast ( , p . ~"C~ v:~ c;.\\fFOL,f ~ ;j~.""" ,\J~ ""'_~ ,t" -~"" lNi5 ""'e', : en -- ~ -i:! ,~ ~i,! \, ~Q. ~~l %'./. + i',p ~~ . WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 pLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman pLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 22, 1997 Matthew E. Pachman Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, NY 11725 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Telecommunications Tower Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc, Westphalia Avenue, Mattituck SCTM # 1000-141-3-34 and 24850 Main Road, Orient SCTM # 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Pachman, I have just received your October 20th letter, Presumably the unnamed law clerk and court reporter whom you sent to the Planning Board work session late yesterday afternoon have spoken with you ab01,tt what transpired at the meeting, But since they did not evidence familiarity with either of the applications, I am sending this letter to ensure that you know that the Board has placed the Mattituck application along with the Orient application on its November 3rd agenda. The Board intends to make its environmental determinations on each application at that time. ~relY , ~A;AI7I Valerie sc~;:;'I'dz. Town Planner / cc: Planning Board Zoning Board Richard Weyhreter, Real Estate Manager, BAM, Inc. . . ..-......--- TRAnSMISSIon REPORT ******************** :TOHn or SOUTHOLD ( OCT <:2'97 15: 11 ) **::f +:~t:**:f,'I;*********:t:*******:**'***:**********>I!****** :f<~..,*********:,f(************:f:*************** 'J< * * >I< * DATE START REI10TE TERllINAL 110DE TII'IE RESUL TS TOTAL DEPT, * * TUIE IDENTIFICATION PAGES CODE * * * * * 'f' * * OCT 22 15: 10 516 543 2271 G3ST 01'13" 01< 02 * * * i' * i * ~ * * * . * * * i' * * * * * * * * * * * I! * * * * * ' * * * * * *******~u~:t, *****"-+'*.>J(****'************_+:**:I<*****************************>J:******************** 10/22/cn I vrtejL -taxeL + fY\a/Je~ " " , " . . PAGHMAN. PAGHMAN & BROWN. P. C. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK. NEW YORK 11725 (516) 543-2200 TELECOPIER (516) 1543-2271 HOWARD E. PAGHMAN MATTHEW E. PAGHMAN KAREN R. BROWN. OOUNSEL .ALSO Al>MITTED IN NEW "~RSf;Y HARVEY B. BESUNDER PATRICK A. SWEENEY AMEL R. MASSA VIA FACSIMILE AND REGULAR MAIL October 20, 1997 Valerie Scopaz, Director of Planning Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Review of Long EAF, Part 3 Bell Atlantic Special Use Permit for Public Utility Structure SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Valerie: Thank you for your fax of Mr. Voorhis' report, dated October 9, 1997, received by this office on the afternoon of October 17, 1997. I note that, first time to Platt Road and Please fax to structures for after months of review, reference is made for the the SPLIA inventory and the Bower-Young house on Route 25 and the Anne Hopkins house on Platt Road. me the blue forms with reference to these two our review and comment. Since the work session is scheduled for tomorrow. your prompt attention is greatly appreciated. MEP/blb Very truly MA~. yours, PACHMAN .. .orient-p.nyn\scopaz.lt4 OCT 2 I . . NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . ~LANNING . CONSULTING CHARLES J. VOORHIS. CEP, Alep. ARTHUR J. KOERBER, PE. . VINCENT G, DONNEllY, P.E . VICTOR BERT, P.E. . JOSEPH R. EPfFAN/A, P.E.' ROBERT G. NELSON, JR. PE . CHRISTOPHER W. ROBINSON, PE Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 October 9, 1997 rlOOr~: I 6 L. 1 !-...-...... , Re: Review of Long EAF, Part 3 Bell Atlantic Special Use Permit for Public Utility Structure SCTMNo. 1000-018-6-5 N&P No. 97127 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, we have completed a review of the Long EAF, Part 3 for the above referenced project. The document was prepared by the project sponsor at your request, and is in part a response to our comments on the Long EAF, Part 1. The initial review of the Long EAF, Part I, recommended preparation of a Long EAF, Part 3 to provide further analysis of the potential land use conflicts, visual intrusion and cumulative impacts of the proposed project. In addition, the Planning Board asked that the project sponsor provide documentation of need for the proposed project. Description of the Proposed Project The subject site is a 10.54 acre parcel of agricultural land in the hamlet of Orient, and is located on the south side ofNYS Route 25 approximately 375 east of Platt Road. The property and has approximately 224 feet of frontage on NYS 25, and the area of the site is zoned for single family development on two acre lots (R-80). The proposed action involves an application for a special exception to allow a public utility structure on the property, and involves construction of an 85' monopole for a cellular telephone antenna. The pole would be approximately 2 feet in diameter, and approximately 0.05 acres of the overall parcel would be leased to the project sponsor, Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, for the antenna and a 466 s.f equipment shelter. A gravel road would be constructed for access to the facility, and a chain link fence would be installed around the facility to protect the antenna from vandalism. As was discussed in the initial review, the impacts to natural resources as a result of the proposed project are expected to be minimal. The primary concerns which were to be addressed in the Pag~ 1 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE, NY 11747-218S (518) 427-5885 FAX (518] 427-5820 . II Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part 3 Review Long EAF, Part 3 were the expected land use conflicts, visual impacts and the potential that approval would create a precedent for approval of such facilities on residentially zoned lands. In addition, the potential impact to historical resources will be addressed herein. This issue was not discussed in the Long EAF Part 3, but the presence of adjacent historic structures has been raised subsequent to scoping of the Part 3. The following text will address each of these issues as well as the need for the project, which was discussed in the Long EAF, Part 3. Need for the Proposed Project The Long EAF Part 3 provides affidavits as well as other information supporting the need for the proposed project. This information indicated that a gap in coverage exists, and further states the methodology concerning the location and height of the proposed monopole which was used in designing the installation. It is recognized that there are no industrially zoned lands within the Hamlet of Orient, and that most of the commercial land is located within the historic district. Thus, if there is a need for a telecommunications structure within the hamlet, it is likely to be necessary to locate it on residentially zoned land, however, alternative sites might result in a reduction of the environmental impacts of the proposed project while still meeting the objectives of the project sponsor. A site with more adequate screening, existing buildings or trees, or more compatible adjacent uses would be preferable in order to reduce the visual and land use impacts of the proposed project. The Long EAF Part 3 states that "the selection of optimal communication facility sites are dictated by service gaps, capacity issues, geography, topography, etc. It is a highly specialized and technical process performed by public utility providers of cellular service". It is acknowledged that the utility providers are best qualified to plan the location of telecommunication facilities to maximize the quality of service, however, the Town has a clear interest in regulating the location of telecommunication towers and in helping to identifY optimal sites, particularly if a proposed location would result in significant environmental impacts. If it is determined that the proposed project warrants a positive declaration, the Town may wish to seek independent assessment of the need for the project and exploration of alternative sites as part of the review of an Environmental Impact Statement. Potential Land Use Conflicts The Long EAF Part 3 makes the argument that there is no potential land use conflict associated with the proposed project, as public utility structures are allowed by special exception under existing Town code. The document states that: "The Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile is a public utility. As such, the proposed monopole and equipment shelter are permitted by special exception by the Board of Appeals, subject to conditions imposed by that Board Thus, by virtue of the above, the public utility structure has been determined by the Town of Southold to be compatible with and not in conflict with the zoning of the subject property. " .II&V NELSON. POPE 0: VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL. PLANNING. CONSULTING Page 2 . ~I Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part 3 Review Impacts on land use and the character of an area can not be determined solely by reference to zoning regulations. The scope of the SEQRA process as outlined within the Long EAF, Part 2, clearly includes impacts to the character of a project area and conformance to municipal land use goals. The fact that a proposed project is a contemplated use under zoning does not inherently imply it will not result in significant impacts to the character of an area. As was discussed in the initial review of the LEAF Part 1, the location of a tall communication tower within an agricultural field located in an historic, rural area does represent an inherent land use conflict. Such structures would be more appropriate within industrially zoned areas, where they are compatible with the surrounding uses. The project site is zoned for residential development on two acre lots, as is almost all of the surrounding area. The Long EAF Part 3 further maintains that "the proposed monopole presents no more of a land use conflict than the existing utility poles and lines". This is essentially a subjective assertion on the visual impact of the proposed monopole, which will be discussed more fully in the next section. The existing utility poles along NYS 25 and other local roadways are an accepted part of the rural landscape. A significantly taller, metal tower located within an open field will result in a greater visual intrusion than the existing utility lines, and there will be a substantial land use conflict if the visual impact of the proposed monopole is not mitigated. Visual Impacts The Long EAF Part 3 utilizes both photographs of an existing monopole in Mattituck and realistic renderings of the proposed monopole in order to examine the potential impact of the new structure. The document concludes that there will be no significant visual impact to the surrounding area, stating that the proposed pole will be no more intrusive than existing utility lines and poles in the surrounding area. It is true that monopole may blend in with the adjacent landscape when viewed from a distance, particularly if it is a blue-gray in color as shown in the renderings, however, viewpoints in closer proximity to the pole will be impacted. The renderings show that the monopole will dominate views in the immediate area of the site. Thus, impacts to the immediate area are of primary concern due to the open character of the property and adjacent single family homes. The Long EAF Part 3 compares the proposed project with the existing monopole in Mattituck. The photographs of the Mattituck monopole suggest that the structure has a minimal impact on the surrounding area, however, this is a best case scenario. Of the four existing structures discussed in the Cumulative Impacts Section of the Long EAF, the Mattituck structure has the least visual impact because of its design, siting and adjacent trees. The proposed site plan shows the Orient monopole to be similar in design, with a single solid supporting pole which is blue-gray in color. This will help mitigate the visual impact of the project, and will present less of an impact than a latticed tower design, which has been utilized for some facilities. Although the design of the proposed monopole will provide some mitigation, the impact will be greater than at the Mattituck site. The Mattituck monopole is surrounded by trees, and is located to the rear of an existing industrial building. The trees screen views of the site from most of the nearby area, although the pole is visible from some distant perspectives. In contrast, the proposed Orient IIP&Y NELSON. POPE oS: VDORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 3 . tl Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part 3 Review monopole will be located in the middle of an open agricultural field, and will be much more visible. There are existing street trees along portions of NYS 25 which will provide some mitigation, however SCreening is minimal along Platt Road and from much of the eastbound lane of NYS 25. The Long EAF Part 3 also argues that the area of the project site is not pristine, and that utility poles, transformers and overhead lines already create a visual intrusion. It is true that the existing utility poles detract from the visual quality along the roadway, however, these poles are an accepted part of the rural landscape and are not located in the middle of an open field. They are wooden and much smaller than the proposed monopole, which helps to mitigate their impact. The Long EAF also argues that in Viewpoint 1 of the simulations, the monopole appears to be the same size as the adjacent utility pole because the utility pole is in the foreground. Although this is true, viewers will perceive the pole as significantly larger, as the human eye does correct for distance. In addition, the monopole will be visible to motorists for a longer time period than any one utility pole. Thus, the proposed project represents a greater visual intrusion into the rural quality of the area than the existing utility lines. It is expected that a monopole located within the agricultural field will present a significant visual impact, particularly if mitigation is not employed. The primary concern is the perspective from the residences along Platt Road, where there is little screening vegetation and the distance to the pole is minimal. Mitigation can be implemented to reduce the potential impacts, but some impacts will remain. Relocation along the windbreak along the southeastern border would be preferable to reduce visual impacts, but would not allow an adequate fall zone to the adjacent residence. The Long EAF indicates that the project sponsor is willing to relocate the existing shrubs on the property around the monopole in order to provide visual screening, and that supplemental landscaping could also be planted. Landscaping should be required, and should include planting of trees which will offer substantial screening at maturity. Relocation of the existing shrubs would not be sufficient, as they will not be tall enough to provide significant screening, but the project sponsor has indicated a willingness to provide supplemental landscaping. Planting should occur both at the fence line to screen the utility building and base of the pole, as well as at a distance from the pole to provide mitigation from longer distances. Further reduction of the height of the pole might also be considered. This reduction of the height of the monopole and planting of vegetation would provide some mitigation of the impact to views of the proposed monopole, however, the agricultural vista across the property will be significantly altered. As an alternative, the project sponsors have also indicated their willingness to camouflage the structure as a silo, bell tower, or other vertical structure, and computer simulations of these alternatives were prepared and are included in the Long EAF Part 3. The Town may wish to consider this alternative, which would result in a less obtrusive change in the agricultural vista, although neither a silo or bell tower are appropriate to the local landscape. In particular, the bell tower shown in the Long EAF might be appropriate adjacent to a church with a modem architectural design, but is clearly out of context in an agricultural field within an historical hamlet. A silo might be more appropriate, however, grain silos are not part of historic agricultural uses within the Town, and a windmill or other structure might be preferable. The use of a .II&Y NELSON. POPE &: VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSUL TINe; Page 4 . tl Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part 3 Review camouflaged structure such as a church steeple or a bell tower is more suitable for a developed property, where it would be more in context. The Long EAF Part 3 indicated that the project sponsor initially investigated the Orient Fire Department as a potential monopole site, but were refused because of the public controversy surrounding the project. A bell tower at this location would be preferable to the project as proposed. In summary, the potential visual impacts of the proposed structure can be partially mitigated through the reduction in height, use of screening vegetation and camouflage of the monopole as a windmill or other vertical structure. These mitigation measures would result in remaining visual impacts, including alteration of the agricultural vista from some perspectives and introduction of a new structure into a rural area. Cumulative Impacts The original review of the Long EAF, Part 1 indicated that the proposed project presents the potential for cumulative impacts due to the precedent set by location of the telecommunication monopole within a rural area. The Long EAF Part 3 asserts that the proposed project would not result in cumulative impacts, as there are four other existing telecommunication towers within the Town; however, none of these towers are located within a residential area. The AT&T tower in Southold is located on residentially zoned land, however, it is located on a municipal property which includes the Police Station with a pre-existing radio tower and a Highway Department yard. The other three towers are located either on industrial or commercially zoned properties. The two 100 foot structures in Cutchogue and Mattituck are both on industrial properties, while the 85 foot monopole tower in Cutchogue is located on a commercial property. Thus, the proposed project would set a precedent by allowing a communication tower to be located on a residential property within a rural area. The fact that the four other towers discussed in the LEAF, Part 3 were allowed and received negative declarations does not support approval of the proposed project. The location of other existing poles within more appropriate contexts should not be used as an argument for location of a monopole in Orient. The Long EAF Part 3 also discusses the potential for cumulative impact on public health due to the effects of radio frequency emissions, although this discussion was not requested in the initial review. The Long EAF is correct concluding that no cumulative impacts on public health are expected, as the project will conform to Federal guidelines for radio frequency emissions. The Long EAF Part 3 also indicates that one of the most effective means to limit the cumulative impact of cellular communications facilities in an area is to encourage co-location of facilities on the same structure Historical Resources Although review of the historical resources within the area of the site was not required within the scope of the Long EAF, Part 3, there are several properties in the hamlet which are identified by the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities (SPLIA) as of potential historic significance and are recommended for inclusion on the State and Federal registers. A list of these .P&V NELSON. POPE &: VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL. PLANNING. CONSULTING Page 5 . . 'II Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part 3 Review structures provided by the Town was reviewed, and it was determined that at least one of these structures, the Bower - Young house, is located adjacent to the proposed monopole site at the southeast comer of Platt Road and NYS 25. A second structure, the Anne Hopkins House, is listed as possibly located on the west side of Platt Road, although the location is in question on the list provided by the Town. The location of the proposed monopole on the subject site may impact the historical character of the area based on this inventory of potentially eligible historical structures. Location of the proposed pole further to the south would cause less impact to historical structures, but would increase visual impacts from Platt Road. Conclusion There is a need to balance the protection of environmental resources with the need to provide adequate cellular service within the Town of Southold. The Hamlet of Orient presents a challenge for the location of telecommunications facilities, as the zoning is almost entirely residential, with several historical structures and no industrially zoned lands. The location of the monopole as proposed will result in significant land use, historical and visual impacts, as has been discussed above. Some mitigation is available, including location of the proposed tower further to the south away from the historic structures, use of additional screening vegetation, camouflage of the structure and further reduction of the height of the tower. Impacts will remain which cannot be mitigated, such as the loss of the agricultural vistas from Platt Road and NYS 25, and creation of a precedent for location of such structures within rural residential areas. If the Town feels that these represent substantial impacts, a positive declaration should be considered and a Draft EIS prepared which includes an analysis of alternative sites and more fully discusses public need. Ideally, the project sponsor and Town should work together to identifY a site which would minimize the environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. If you have any further questions or wish any further questions with regard to this matter please do not hesitate to call. Charles J. oorhis, CEP, AICP NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC .P&V NELSON. POPE & VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL. PLANNING. CONSULTING Page 6 . P""CHlvIAN. . P.'\CHMAN & BROWN. P. G. AT1"OANEYS JB6 VEl'ERANS MEMORIAL HJGHWA,Y COMPol^CK. Ne:W YORK' I 7:a5 ~ (51 tlJ 84,).eSOO T;:l~COPliR ce 161 ~..~tl'3271 HOWARD E:'. '-ACHMAtoI lo-tAT"THEW;:: "^~HMA.o'" KAREN A. BROWN" C:OUNSf:l. '~_""'..O',"",""HY KAAVEY a. DESVNDeR PATRICK A_ S'W'EefoiEV .\1ImL R. MASSA VIA FACSIMILE AND REGULAR MAIL October 20, 1997 Valerie Scopaz, Director of Planning Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Review of Long EAF, Part 3 Bell Atlantic Special Use Permit for Public Utility Structure SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Valerie: Thank you for your fax of Mr. Voorhis' report, dated October 9, 1997, received by chis office on the afternoon of October 17, 1997. I note that.; first time to Platt Road and Please fax to structures for after months of review, reference ia made for the the SPLIA inventory and the 13ower-Youn9 house on Route 2S and the Anne Hopkins house on Platt Road. me the blue forms with reference to these two our review and comment. Since the work session is scheduled for tomorrow, y')ur prompt attention 15 greatly appreciated. ~ ~\~~~~ PACHMAN Very truly MA~. yours, MEE'/blb orlenC-@_nyn\SCGp4Z. ~t, ocr 2 I . ./;i~~IlFFOlt~_ ;;.r."'-':.~ ..t'a~ .'.....v . ~_, ".::::' ., 0 v~ . . ~:; '~Q , - !.::; ::, CI:) , C::i S~. ~.:; "'~ ~~.; ~ '11.1 + -+...:s .'_ ~:::;;~~.::}~~-:~'> . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 SouthoJd, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 7, 1997 Matthew E. Pachman Pachman, Pachman & Brown 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, New York 11725 Re: Proposed NYNEX Bell Atlantic Mobile Facilities in Orient and Mattituck Dear Mr. Pachman: This letter is an attempt to address the concerns you expressed about the processing of both the Orient and Mattituck appiications in your letter of September 10, 1997. The first part of your letter focuses on the SEQRA review of the Orient facility, which was not started until April 1 , 1997 as per a NYNEX property representative. On April 22, 1997 the Planning Board assumed lead agency status for both the Planning Board and Zoning Board applications. A long Environmental Assessment Form was prepared by NYNEX and reviewed by Nelson, Pope & Voorhis (NPV), the town's environmental consultant. On May 12, 1997 the Planning Board reviewed the EAF and the comments from NYNEX and NPV, and decided to request a Part III assessment to address land use conflicts arising from placing a large telecommunications tower in the middle of a farm field within the historic rural hamlet of Orient. A Part III analysis was submitted by NYNEX on June 23, 1997. It was sent to NPV for review on June 26, 1997. On July 15, NYNEX was informed that the Part III review fee was $650. This fee was paid on August 19, 1997, and the consultant submitted his Part III review on September 15th. I believe that this review shows that the town has acted diligently in processing the SEQRA review on the NYNEX application. . . Page 2 Proposed NYNEX Sell Atlantic Mobile Facilities in Orient and Mattituck October 6, 1997 As explained in earlier correspondence, environmental review fees reflect our actual review costs which, like everything else, have gone up over the years. Also, you are not being charged for the preparation of an environmental assessment form or a determination of significance, but for outside expertise to provide an objective review of the project. The second concern voiced in your letter references a staff memo recounting a discussion with NPV. You maintain that the setbacks of the structure have no bearing on its potential environmental impacts. To the contrary, the location of the structure on the site, in relation to other structures and property lines, may have a bearing on the impact of the structure on aesthetic resources or on the existing community and its character. 6 NYCRR Part 617. 7(c)(1 )(v). The law calls for these impacts to be considered, and relevant information is needed to make an informed assessment. The staff memo was written in order to solicit and document coordination and agreement on the facts. The Planning Board is making every effort to process these applications in a timely and just manner. Your correspondence regarding fees has protracted the processing time, particularly given the detailed legal references to previous cases, all of which required careful review and research in order to answer. While we recognize that you are entitled to protect your client's position, may I point out that we are providing a service to your client within a fixed fee, and not at an hourly rate for actual staff time required to answer your many letters and telephone calls. You do your client a disservice if you advise him that he is entitled to fees equivalent to those paid on other cell towers built several years ago and in locations with different zoning and environmental issues. With all due respect, a more cooperative stance on your part would benefit all of us in completing the SEQRA review. For example, in the August 21 st letter from Valerie Scopaz, you were asked to provide infonmation about the location of overhead lines within 100 feet of the proposed Mattituck tower. We have not yet received a response, and would appreciate hearing from you promptly on this issue. ~~ r Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. . . MEMORANDUM TO FILE On September 24th, I spoke with Chic Voorhis of Nelson, Pope & Voorhis about Matthew Pachman's letter of September 12th regarding the Town's handling of the SEQRA review for the two NYNEX applications before the Planning Board. I relayed to him the Board's wish that his environmental review be predicated on the present status of the application and not the proposed legislation which mayor may not be enacted. He agreed to revisit the recommendation and to forward a revision in a timely fashion. V. Scopaz . . ;>e, ~ << PACHMAN. PACHMAN & BROWN. P. G. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK, NEWYORK 11725 (516) 543.2200 TELECOPIER (516) 543-2271 HOWARD E. PACHMAN MATTHEW E. PACHMAN KAREN R. BROWN. COUNSEL 'ALIIO ~~ITTED IN NEW ,JERSEY HARVEY B. BESUNDER PATRICK A. SWEENEY AMEL R. MASSA September 22, 1997 HAND DELIVERED Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman of Planning Board Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 i :)1 ( ~ I L..._. SEP 2 3 1997 RE: Proposed Bell Atlantic Mobile ("BAM") Public Utility Communications Facility Main Road, Orient and Westphalia Avenue, Mattituck Dear Mr. Orlowski: I have reviewed the correspondence from Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NPV) relative to the pending Bell Atlantic Mobile applications in Orient and Mattituck and offer the following comments: Orient Similar to the August 15, 1997 NPV correspondence regarding the Mattituck site, it again appears that NPV is proffering inappropriate and incorrect legal advice. The September 12, 1997 NPV correspondence states: .since the time that the original Long EAF, Part I was prepared, the Town enacted a 120 day moratorium on the si ting of communications towers in May 1997. The moratorium was intended to allow sufficient time for draft legislation to be prepared which would regulate the potential impacts of these structures. A draft amendment to the Town Code has been completed. The amended code has not yet been adopted, but will apply to the proposed application if it is approved by the Town Board. The opinion offered by NPV has nothing to do with environmental significance and is contrary to law. The moratorium has now been extended, and a moratorium is not proper if it has been designed to stifle application . . Page 2 Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman of Planning Board September 22, 1997 processing. The September 12, 1997 correspondence also opines that the "Long EAF Part 3 makes the argument that there is no potential land use conflict associated with the proposed project, as public utili ty structures are allowed by special exception under existing Town Code. . . The fact that a proposed project is an allowed use under zoning does not inherently imply it will not result in land use conflicts. "Again, this is a legal matter wherein the opinion provided by NPV is unsubstantiated. NPV also recommends that the project sponsor provide "adequate documentation that alternative sites were explored. More appropriate sites might include the airstrip to the east of the si te, or the fire department property, which was previously explored." First, special use permits do not require evaluation of alternatives. Second, extensive testimony was provided to the Board of Zoning Appeals regarding the suitability of these specific sites and one questions why NPV does not discuss this testimony. Furthermore, this issue does not directly relate to the environmental impacts of the proposed application. What is also interesting is that on the issue of visual impacts, which is one of the few true environmental issues discussed in NPV's correspondence, NPV's conclusion inappropriately relates to a proposal for alternative sites ". . . the potential visual impacts of the proposed structure can be partially mi tigated through the reduction in height, use of screening vegetation and camouflage of the monopole as a windmill or other vertical structure. These mi tigation measures would resul t in some remaining visual impacts, including al teration of the agricul tural vista from some perspectives and introduction of a new structure into the area. Thus, the location on alternative sites should be explored [emphasis added] " NPV questions the public need for the proposed facility and suggests that the town retain a technical consultant to help assess whether there is a compelling need for the proposed facility in Orient. There is no provision in the Town Code for this. Finally, NPV has approximately a page of narrative that relates to "Other Issues Raised Within the Draft Ordinance." As previously stated, the draft ordinance is not in effect. . . Page 3 Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman of Planning Board September 22, 1997 Thus, it is useless for the purpose of assessing the environmental impacts of the pending application. The SEQRA process relates to the current application which is subject to the existing laws of the Town of Southold. Mattituck The September 12, 1997 correspondence from NPV regarding the Mattituck site also offers inappropriate legal advice and emphasizes compliance with the proposed draft ordinance. With regard to geology, groundwater, ecology, community services and traffic, NPV concludes that the proposed action will not result in significant adverse environmental impacts thereto. However, NPV states that the "visual impacts of the proposed project are . . . likely to be significant, and only partial mitigation is available because of the small size and layout of the subject property." However, despite the fact that the Part I EAF stated that a bell tower would be erected, NPV's comments relate to the visual impacts of the standard monopole shown on the plans that were initially submitted to the Board of Zoning Appeals. No discussion is offered by NPV as to the ability of a bell tower design to mitigate potential impacts on visual quality. Similar to the correspondence for the Orient site, much discussion is provided relative to conformance with the proposed ordinance. Again, the proposed ordinance has nothing to do with the environmental significance of the pending application. It is interesting that this section of the NPV correspondence also offers legal opinions regarding non- conforming uses and substandard lots. Again, not only is NPV unqualified to render legal opinions, as indicated in my September 10, 1997 correspondence to the Town of Southold, these issues have little to do with environmental significance. Ve,y~~rs, MAT~HE~. PACHMAN MEP/blb cc: Jean Cochran, Supervisor Laury L. Dowd, Town Attorney Board of Zoning Appeals Valeria Scopaz, Director of Planning Richard Weyhreter, Real Estate Manager . . ~ t7r'4~ N", C 0 V E R FAX SHE E T ~"I~ tJ;?7( /2!: N~h/mtJ) ,o/tC/r/-fPirl ~- i. /7 1'1 /l18~ iT : ~rc/>VY _ f~~~~~/1/'(ri/~ ~- ~ . (91;:{'11/~) ! /'1'"/1+1/ From the desk of... Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. NY 11971 (561) 765-1938 Fax: (516) 765-3136 . NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL. PLANNING. CONSULTING CHARLES J. VOORHIS. CEP, AICp. ARTHUR J. KOERBER, PE. . VINCENT G. DONNELLY, P.E . VICTOR BERT. RE.' JOSEPH R.EPIFAN1A, PE.' ROBERT G,NELSON, JR, P.E. . CHRISTOPHER W. ROBINSON, P.E September 12, 1997 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review of Long EAF, Part 3 Bell Atlantic Special Use Permit for Public Utility Structure SCTM No. 1000-018-6-5 N&P No. 97127 Dear Mr. Ward: As per your request, we have completed a review of the Long EAF, Part 3 for the above referenced project. The document was prepared by the project sponsor at your request, and is in part a response to our comments on the Long EAF, Part 1. The initial review of the Long EAF, Part 1, recommended preparation of a Long EAF, Part 3 to provide further analysis of the potential land use conflicts, visual intrusion and cumulative impacts of the proposed project. In addition, the Town Board asked that the project sponsor provide documentation of need for the proposed project. As you realize, since the time that the original Long EAF, Part 1 was prepared, the Town enacted a 120 day moratorium on the siting of communication towers in May 1997. The moratorium was intended to allow sufficient time for draft legislation to be prepared which would regulate the potential impacts of these structures. A draft amendment to the Town Code has been completed. The amended code has not yet been adopted, but will apply to the proposed application if it is approved by the Town Board. In addition, the ordinance established important guidelines and performance standards which involve sound principals of environmenlal planning. These guidelines would be relevant in the context of review and in the effort to minimize impacts, regardless of the time schedule for adoption of the ordinance. Thus, the following text will review the potential impacts of the proposed project in the context of the proposed amendment to the Town Code. Description of the Proposed Project The subject site is a 10.54 acre parcel of agricultural land in the hamlet of Orient, and is located on the south side ofNYS Route 25 approximately 375 east of Platt Road. The property and has _ ., - -,.~-.~~...._'-"! LU j i ~ t'i U', 1..1 SEP I 5 19m Page 1 672 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE, NY 11747.21 Be (51 S) 427-5865 FAX (518) 427.5620 . II Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part 3 Review approximately 224 feet of frontage on NYS 25, and the area of the site is zoned for single family development on two acre lots (R-80). The proposed action involves an application for a special exception to allow a public utility structure on the property, and involves construction of an 85' monopole for a cellular telephone antenna. The pole would be approximately 2 feet in diameter, and approximately 0.05 acres of the overall parcel would be leased to the project sponsor, Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, for the antenna and a 466 s.f equipment shelter. A gravel road would be constructed for access to the facility, and a chain link fence would be installed around the facility to protect the antenna from vandalism. As was discussed in the initial review, the impacts to natural resources as a result of the proposed project are expected to be minimal. The primary concerns which were to be addressed in the Long EAF, Part 3 were the expected land use conflicts, visual impacts and the potential that approval would create a precedent for approval of such facilities on residentially zoned lands. The following text will address each of these issues, with reference to the draft ordinance where appropriate. The need for the project as well as other issues raised by the ordinance will also be discussed. Need for the Proposed Project Although the proposed draft ordinance encourages location of telecommunication structures in industrial areas, they are allowed in residential zones by special exception, as long as clear public need is shown and other sites are unsuitable. Under the draft code, the project sponsor has the burden of providing adequate documentation to show that alternative sites have been explored and that there is a compelling public need for the structure as proposed. The Long EAF Part 3 provides affidavits as well as other information supporting the need for the proposed project, however, this information has not been assessed by an independent consultant as suggested within the code. In addition, it is not clear from the Long EAF Part 3 that alternative sites were adequately explored. It is recognized that there are no industrially zoned lands within the Hamlet of Orient, and that most of the commercial land is located within the historic district. Thus, if there is a need for a telecommunications structure within the hamlet, it may be necessary to locate it on residentially zoned land, however, it should be possible to find an alternative site. A site with more adequate screening, existing buildings or more compatible adjacent uses would be preferable in order to reduce the visual and land use impacts of the proposed project. For instance, it has been suggested that the applicant consider locating at the air strip to the east of the site. The Long EAF Part 3 states that "the selection of optimal communication facility sites are dictated by service gaps, capacity issues, geography, topography, etc. It is a highly specialized and technical process peiformed by public utility providers of cellular service", It is acknowledged that the utility providers are best qualified to plan the location of telecommunication facilities to maximize the quality of service, however, the Town has a clear interest in regulating the location of telecommunication towers and in helping to identifY optimal IIP&Y NELSON. POPE 6: VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLAJ'\lNING . CONSULTING Page 2 . I Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part 3 Review sites. The draft ordinance gives the Town the authority to hire a technical consultant at the expense of the applicant. Therefore, it is recommended that the Town exercise its option to' hire a technical consultant to help assess the need for the project and to aid the project sponsor in exploring alternative sites as allowed within the proposed code. Potential Land Use Conflicts Long EAF Part 3 makes the argument that there is no potential land use conflict associated with the proposed project, as public utility structures are allowed by special exception under existing Town code. The document states that, "The Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile is a public utility. As such, the proposed monopole and equipment shelter are permitted by special exception by the Board of Appeals, subject to conditions imposed by that Board. Thus, by virtue of the above, the public utility structure has been determined by the Town of Southhold to be compotible with and not in conflict with the zoning of the subject property. " The fact that a proposed project is an allowed use under zoning does not inherently imply it will not result in land use conflicts, and the special exception approval process gives the Town Board control over the siting of new facilities in recognition of the potential for conflicts with surrounding development. Furthermore, when the Town code was written, proliferation of telecommunication structures was not foreseen, and the Town has subsequently recognized the need to expand the zoning code to outline the criteria for special exemptions to be granted by the Town for the siting of such facilities. The potential for land use impacts is a primary reason that the Town has undertaken modification of the zoning code to regulate the construction of new telecommunication towers. As was discussed in the initial review of the LEAF Part 1, the location of a tall communication tower within an agricultural field located in a rural area does represent an inherent land use conflict. The draft ordinance recognizes the potential land use conflict between communication towers and residential development, and encourages the location of new structures within industrially zoned areas where they are compatible with the surrounding uses. The project site is zoned for residential development on two acre lots, as is almost all of the surrounding area. There is no industrially zoned land within the Hamlet of Orient, and the commercial lands are located primarily within the historic district where a monopole would also be incompatible. There is a single property zoned for general business use immediately opposite the site, where there is an existing general store. This property would not be a suitable location, as it is within 300 feet of a historic structure. Thus, it is recognized that location of a telecommunication structure within the Hamlet of Orient is likely to require location on residentially zoned land, with some potential for land use conflicts. If a clear need for such a structure is shown, the location must be chosen to minimize land use conflicts, and mitigation should be employed as discussed in the Draft Ordinance. .P&Y NELSON, POPE &. VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 3 . I Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part 3 Review The Long EAF Part 3 further maintains the "the proposed monopole presents no more of a land use conflict than the existing utility poles and lines ". This is essentially a value assertion on the visual impact of the proposed monopole, which will be discussed more fully in the next section. The existing utility poles along NYS 25 and other local roadways are an accepted part of the rural landscape. A significantly taller, metal tower located within an open field will result in a greater visual intrusion than the existing utility lines, and there will be a substantial land use conflict if the visual impact of the proposed monopole is not mitigated. Visual Impacts The Long EAF Part 3 utilizes both photographs of an existing monopole in Mattituck and realistic renderings of the proposed monopole in order to examine the potential impact of the new structure. The document concludes that there will be no significant visual impact to the surrounding area, stating that the proposed pole will be no more intrusive than existing utility lines and poles in the surrounding area. It is true that monopole may blend in with the adjacent landscape when viewed from a distance, particularly if it is a blue-gray in color as shown in the renderings, however, viewpoints in closer proximity to the pole will be impacted. The renderings show that the monopole will dominate views in the immediate area of the site. Thus, impacts to the immediate area are of primary concern due to the open character of the property and adjacent single family homes. The Long EAF Part 3 compares the proposed project with the existing monopole in Mattituck. The photographs of the Mattituck monopole suggest that the structure has a minimal impact on the surrounding area, however, this is a best case scenario. Of the four existing structures discussed in the Cumulative Impacts Section of the Long EAF, the Mattituck structure has the least visual impact because of its design, siting and adjacent trees. The proposed Orient monopole will be similar in design, with a single solid supporting pole which is blue-gray in color. This will help mitigate the visual impact of the project, and will present less of an impact than a tower design, which has been utilized for some facilities. Although the design of the proposed monopole will provide some mitigation, the impact will be greater than at the Mattituck site. The Mattituck monopole is surrounded by trees, and is located to the rear of an existing industrial building. The trees screen views of the site from most of the nearby area, although the pole is visible from some distant perspectives. In contrast, the proposed Orient monopole will be located in the middle of an open agricultural field, and will be much more visible. There are existing street trees along portions of NYS 25 which will provide some mitigation, however screening is minimal along Platt Road and from much of the eastbound lane of NYS 25. The Long EAF Part 3 also argues that the area of the project site is not pristine, and that utility poles, transformers and overhead lines already create a visual intrusion. It is true that the existing utility poles detract from the visual quality of an area, however, these poles are an accepted part of the rural landscape. They are wooden and much smaller than the proposed monopole, which helps to mitigate their impact. The Long EAF also argues that in Viewpoint 1 of the simulations, the monopole appears to be the same size as the adjacent utility pole because the utility pole is in IIP&V NELSON. POPE & VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL. PLANNING. CONSULTING Page 4 -T-- . I. Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part 3 Review the foreground. Although this is true, viewers will perceive the pole as significantly larger, as the human eye does correct for distance. In addition, the monopole will be visible to motorists for a longer time period than anyone utility pole. Thus, the proposed project represents a greater visual intrusion into the rural quality of the area than the existing utility lines. It is expected that a monopole located within the agricultural field will present significant visual impact, particularly if mitigation is not employed. The primary concern is the perspective from the residences along Platt Road, where there is little screening vegetation and the distance to the pole is minimal. Ideally, the monopole should be located at a different site in order to preserve the agricultural vista from Platt Road and the eastbound lane of Main Road. If it is determined there is a clear public need for the proposed project and that the site is the only viable local, mitigation can be implemented to reduce the potential impacts. The Long EAF indicates that the project sponsor is willing to relocate the existing shrubs on the property around the monopole in order to provide visual screening, and that supplemental landscaping could also be planted. Landscaping would be required under the proposed Town code, which clearly outlines the type of visual screening required within residential areas. The proposed ordinance indicates that "To achieve the occlusion. a row of trees shall be preserved and/or planted at 50% of the distance between the tower and the property line. and a second row at 90% of the distance between the tower and the property line...transplanted trees shall have a minimum caliper of 3 inches. be spaced on 30 foot centers and have a typical height of at least 50 fret. " Relocation of the existing shrubs would not fulfill this requirement, as they will not be tall enough to provide significant screening, but the project sponsor has indicated a willingness to provide supplemental landscaping. In addition, the draft law would limit the height of the structure to 60 feet, which would further reduce the potential impact, although it may not meet the needs of the project sponsor. Reduction of the height of the monopole and planting of vegetation as described within the draft ordinance would provide some mitigation of the impact to views of the proposed monopole, however, the agricultural vista across the property will be altered. As an alternative, the project sponsors have also indicated their willingness to camouflage the structure as a silo, bell tower, or other vertical structure, and computer simulations of these alternatives were prepared and are included in the Long EAF Part 3. The Town may wish to consider this alternative, which would result in a less obtrusive change in the agricultural vista, although neither the silo or bell tower are appropriate to the local landscape. In particular, the bell tower shown in the Long EAF might be appropriate adjacent to a church with a modern architectural design, but is clearly out of context in an agricultural field within an historical hamlet. A silo might be more appropriate, however, grain silos are not part of historic agricultural uses within the Town, and a windmill or other structure might be preferable. The Town might also consider allowing the project sponsor to build a camouflaged structure such as a church steeple or a bell tower on a developed property, where it would be more in context. The Long EAF Part 3 indicated that the project sponsor initially investigated the Orient Fire Department as a potential monopole site, but were refused because of the public controversy surrounding the project. Construction of a bell tower at the Fire Department location would clearly be preferable .P&Y NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 5 . I Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part 3 Review to the current project, and thus might be explored if it is determined that there is a need for a monopole within the hamlet. In summary, the potential visual impacts of the proposed structure can be partially mitigated through the reduction in height, use of screening vegetation and camouflage of the monopole as a windmill or other vertical structure. These mitigation measures would result in some remaining visual impacts, including alteration of the agricultural vista from some perspectives and introduction of a new structure into the area. Thus, location on alternative sites should be explored. Cumulative Impacts The original review of the Long EAF Part 1 indicated that the proposed project presents the potential for cumulative impacts due to the precedent set by location of the telecommunication monopole within a rural area. The importance of this issue is reduced by the proposed addition to the zoning code, which will set clear standards for the location of towers within the Town. Although implementation of the proposed ordinance in regard to the proposed project will largely address the problem of cumulative impacts, the following text will respond to the statements made within the Long EAF Part 3. The Long EAF Part 3 asserts that the proposed project would not result in cumulative impacts, as there are four other existing telecommunication towers within the Town; however, none of these towers are located within a residential area. The AT&T tower in Southhold is located on residentially zoned land, however, it is located on a municipal property which includes the Police Station with a pre-existing radio tower and a Highway Department yard. The other three towers are located either on industrial or commercially zoned properties. The two 100 foot structures in Cutchogue and Mattituck are both on industrial properties, while the 85 foot monopole tower in Cutchogue is located on a commercial property. Thus, the proposed project would set a precedent which would allow communication towers to be located on residential properties. The fact that the four other towers discussed in the LEAF, Part 3 were allowed and received negative declarations does not support approval of the proposed project. The location of other existing poles within more appropriate contexts should not be used as an argument for location for monopole in Orient, and the proposed project would set a precedent for siting of poles on residential lands. The Long EAF Part 3 also discusses the potential for cumulative impact on public health due to the effects of radio frequency emissions, although this discussion was not requested in the initial review. The Long EAF is correct concluding that no cumulative impacts on public health are expected, as the project will conform to Federal guidelines for radio frequency emissions. The Long EAF Part 3 also correctly argues that one of the most effective means to limit the cumulative impact of cellular communications facilities in an area is to encourage co-location of facilities on the same structure, and this is discussed in the draft ordinance. If possible, the IIP&V NELSON. POPE &. VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 6 . II Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part 3 Review proposed structure should be designed to allow co-location as suggested in the ordinance. The applicant originally requested a 100' tower in order to provide the co-location of other facilities in the future, although the proposed code would limit the height of structures to 60 feet on residentially zoned lands. If there is a need for multiple towers within the hamlet, the Town may wish to consider allowing a taller tower which would serve several providers at a single location within the Hamlet. The project site is not a suitable location, however, due to the open nature of the site and high potential for visual impacts. If the project sponsor is able to show a clear need for a structure within the Hamlet of Orient and a more appropriate site is identified to minimize land use and visual impacts, construction of a tower taller than 60' might be considered to allow co-location and minimize requests for further towers within the Hamlet. The proposed draft ordinance is intended to minimize the cumulative impacts of new telecommunication facilities. The draft law requires analysis of alternative sites, and encourages of location of towers within industrial areas and co-location of facilities on one structure. Thus, conformance of the proposed project with the draft ordinance can be used to assess the potential cumulative impacts of the location of the monopole on the subject property. It is recommended that the Town follow the guidelines within the Draft Law, particularly in determining need for the project and assessment of alternative sites. Other Issues Raised Within the Draft Ordinance The proposed wireless communication facility ordinance raises other issues which are relevant to the proposed project in addition to visual and land use impacts. The draft ordinance requires exploration of alternative sites, documentation of need, a landscaping plan, and a copy of the agreement of deed. Some of this information has been provided in the Long EAF, Part 3, but an alternatives analysis and a landscaping plan should be prepared. The code does allow the Town to be more permissive when a structure is proposed for use by more than one service provider, and a monopole of more than 60 feet might be considered if it would allow co-location. The draft law also makes several recommendations for fencing, signs, lighting and similar design features, and these standards should be applied to the proposed project if it is approved. The plan submitted with the subject application does meet the minimum requirements for setbacks and fencing, and the structure would be blue-gray in color as required by the code. The proposed law also requires that a communication structure be located at least 300 feet from any historical landmark property as listed by the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities (SPLIA) or on State or Federal Registers. There are several properties in the hamlet which are identified by SPLIA as of potential historic significance and are recommended for inclusion on the State and Federal registers. A list of these structures provided by the Town was reviewed, and it was determined that at least one of these structures, the Bower - Young house, is located within 300 feet of the proposed monopole site at the southeast corner of Platt Road and NYS 25. A second structure, the Anne Hopkins House, is listed as possibly located on the west side of Platt Road, although the location is in question on the list provided by the Town. The exact location of this house should be determined. If the proposed monopole is to be permitted IIPhV NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC/ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 7 . II Atlantic Mobile @ Orient LEAF Part J Review on site, the location should be moved to the south away from any historic structures. This will result in increased visual impacts to views along Platt Road, as the views across the site are more open to the south where there is no windbreak between the site and the property to the east. There are historical properties located throughout much of the hamlet, which will restrict identification of alternative sites, particularly along NYS 25. The pole might best be located along a windbreak to the rear of an agricultural parcel where there are few residences. The fire department property, which was listed above as a potential site for a camouflaged structure, abuts properties which are listed by SPLIA. A properly camouflaged structure might not result in a significant intrusion into the historic nature of the area, and the Town might allow construction if such mitigation is employed. The need to providing adequate service, and to protect open space, agricultural areas, residential development and historic structures must all be weighed in the identification of optimum sites. Conclusion There is a need to balance the protection of environmental resources with the need to provide adequate cellular service within the Town of Southold. The Hamlet of Orient presents a challenge for the location of telecommunications facilities, as the zoning is almost entirely residential, with no industrially zoned lands. It is recommended the Town enforce the draft ordinance in reference to the proposed project, and require that the project sponsor provide adequate documentation that alternative sites were explored. More appropriate sites might include the airstrip to the east of the site, or the fire department property, which was previously explored. It is also suggested that the Town hire a technical consultant to help assess whether there is a compelling need for a proposed communication structure within the Hamlet of Orient, and to help identify other potential locations. Documentation of need was provided in the Long EAF, Part 3, but this information has not been independently assessed. If it is determined that there is a need for a facility within the hamlet, and that no suitable alternative sites are available, mitigation of the visual impacts of the proposed monopole will be necessary. This might include location of the proposed tower further to the south away from the historic structures, use of additional screening vegetation, and further reduction of the tower to 60' as required under the proposed code. The proposed ordinance on the location of wireless communication facilities should provide adequate protection of the environmental resources of the site as balanced against the need to provide cellular service throughout the Town If you have any further questions or wish any further questions with regard to this matter please do not hesitate to call. .P&Y NELSON, POPE &; VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL. PLANNING. CONSULTING Page 8 . . . PACHMAN. PACHMAN & BROWN. P.C. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK, NEWYORK 11725 . It .-'D sw:i b (516) 543-2200 TELECOPIER (~16) 543-2271 HOWARD E. PAGHMAN MATTHEW E. PACHMAN KAREN R. BROWN- COlJ:-rSEL '.'<LSO-..olofITTEDIN"'EwJt:RSEY HARVEY B. BESUNDER PATRICK A. SWEENEY AMEL R. MASSA September 10, 1997 Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman of Planning Board Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 5EF : 2 ,.....~ 1'-"_ RE: Proposed Bell Atlantic Mobile ("BAM") Public Utility Communications Facility Main Road, orient and Westphalia Avenue, Mattituck Dear Mr. Orlowski: I have reviewed the following correspondence from the Town of Southold Planning Board and Planning Department: 1. Letters of July 15, 1997 and August 15, 1997 regarding the Orient site; and 2. Memoranda of August 15 and 18, 1997 and letter of August 21, 1997 regarding the Mattituck site. As you are aware, BAM has great concern about how these applications are being handled by the Planning Department. Main Road. orient The correspondence relating to the Orient site pertains to the fees for environmental review. The Town of Southold has charged $850.00 for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form and an additional $650.00 for review of the Part III. First, we can find no provision in the Southold Town Code to require an applicant to pay such fees, nor a schedule as to how the fees are computed. The only section which authorizes a town agency to submit a fee to defray environmental review costs is section 44-9(c) which only applies if an applicant "decides not to submit a draft environmental impact statement" and the town agency chooses to prepare one on its own. . . Page 2 Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman of Planning Board September 10, 1997 Second, I have compared the environmental review fees being charged by the Town of Southold to those charged by other municipalities. Clearly, the Southold fees are excessive. For example, the Town of Brookhaven charges $100.00 for a review of a Long Environmental Assessment Form and $500.00 for a Part III. It is also disturbing that the review fee for the standard Long Environmental Assessment Form is $200.00 more than for the Part III, although the Part III is a more lengthy and comprehensive document. WestDhalia Avenue. Mattituck The Mattituck correspondence discuss issues which do not relate to environmental significance. For example, the memorandum of August 15, 1997 states, in part: Todav. the [environmental] consultant called to discuss questions about the location of the orooosed structures .. . relative to the subiect lot's boundaries. To wit: which vards are the front. side and rear yards. assuminq each vard is aoolicable? And. do anv of the orooosed vards meet the minimum required setback requirements? While these issues may be pertinent to the considerations of the Zoning Board of Appeals, the environmental consultant's interpretation of the front, side and rear yards and setbacks therefrom are not relevant, nor do they relate to environmental significance. The interpretation of the Zoning Code is by law the provence of the building official and Zoning Board of Appeals. It is certainly not a function of an outside environmental consultant employed to review SEQR. In fact, I see no issues in the memorandum of August 15 and 18, 1997 that relate to the environmental significance of the pending application. 6 NYCRR Part 617.7(c) (1) provides guiding criteria for determining the significance of a proposed action, as follows: . . Page 3 Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman of Planning Board September 10, 1997 (1) To determine whether a proposed Tvpe I or Unlisted Action mav have a siqnificant adverse impact on the environment.! the impacts that mav be reasonablv expected to result from the proposed action must be compared aqainst the criteria in this subdivision. The followinq list is illustrative. not exhaustive. These criteria are considered indicators of siqnificant adverse impacts on the environment: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) a substantial adverse chanqe in existinq air qualitv. qround or surface water quali tv or quanti tv. traffic. or noise levels: a substantial increase in solid waste production: a substantial increase in potential for erosion. floodinq. leachinq or drainaqe problems: the removal or destruction of larqe quanti ties of veqetation or fauna: substantial interference with the movement of anv resident or miqratorv fish or wildlife species: impacts on a siqnificant habitat area: substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or endanqered species of animal or plant. or the habitat of such a species: or other siqnificant impacts to natural resources: the impairment of the environmental characteristics of a Critical Environmental Area as desiqnated pursuant to subdivision 617.14(q) of this Part: the creation of a material conflict with a communi tv's current plans Qr qoals as officiallv approved or adopted: the impairment qualitv of archeoloqical. of the character or important historical. architectural. or , 6 NYCRR Part 617.2(1) defines "Environment" as the "physical conditions that will be affected by a proposed action, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, resources of agricultural, archeological, historic or aesthetic significance, existing patterns of population concentration, distribution or growth, existing community or neighborhood character, and human health." . . Page 4 Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman of Planning Board September 10, 1997 (vil (viil (viiil (ixl (xl (xi) (xiil aesthetic resources or of existinq communitv or neiqhborhood character: a maior chanqe in the use of either the quantitv or type of enerqv: the creation of a hazard to human health: a substantial chanqe in the use. or intensity of use. of land includinq architectural. ooen soace or recreational resources. or in its caoacitv to suooort existinq uses: the encouraqinq or attractinq or a larqe number of oeoole to a olace or olaces for more than a few davs. comoared to the number of oeoole who would come to such olace absent the action: the creation of a material demand for other actions that would result in one of the above consequences: chanqes in two or more elements of the environment. no one of which has a siqnif icant imoact on the environment, but when considered toqether result in a substantial adverse imoact on the environment: or two or more related actions undertaken, funded or aooroved bv an aqencv. none of which has or would have a siqnificant imoact on the environment, but when considered cumulativelY would meet one or more of the criteria in this subdivision. As indicated on the above, the determination of side yards, front yards, etc. has no bearing on the determination of environmental significance for a proposed action. Clearly, delaying a determination of environmental signif icance for such reason is illegal and improper. Please note that the Planning Department continues to handle these applications at its own risk. The use of procedural devices to hamper, delay, and frustrate the application runs a foul of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. . . Page 5 Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman of Planning Board September 10, 1997 Should you wish to discuss this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. v~? MATTHEW E. yours, PACHMAN MEP/blb cc: Jean Cochran, Supervisor Laury L. Dowd, Town Attorney Board of Zoning Appeals Valeria Scopaz, Director of Planning Richard Weyhreter, Real Estate Manager ...mattituck.nyn/orlowski.ltr . ," 'ilIlFFOl.t ~~ S:i.~ ~(?~-c. ~ "~' =:: ~ .. ;; . . : " ~ -~.: ~,'. ~Q.i .. ~~~.: -'->;--?:::...~.~.:1;:':"- . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR Chainnan WILLIAM J, CREMERS KENNETH L, EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N ew York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 25, 1997 Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Rd Melville, NY 11747 Re: Review of EAF Part III for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile at Orient, NY SCTM # 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Voorhis: This is to confirm my telephone message of August 21, 1997, notifying you of receipt of payment from the applicant for the above-noted review. Please commence work on this EAF Part III in time for the Planning Board's next scheduled public meeting on September 15, 1997. If you have any questions, please contact this office. ~ Valerie sco~ Town Planner cc: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals . . 5~ PAGHMAN. PAGHMAN & BROWN. P. G. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK. NEWYORK 11725 (516) 543-2200 TELEGOPIER (516) 543.2271 HOWARD E. PACHMAN MATTHEW E. PAGHMAN KAREN R. BROWN'" COUNSEL HARVEY B. BE SUNDER PATRIGK A. SWEENEY 'N..SO ADMITTED ,t< NEW ....ERSEY August 19,1997 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, Main Road P.O.B. 1179 Southold, NY 11971 vh~ m rJ,.xo,w(JV ATT: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Re: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile site Plan, orient #SCTM #1000-018-6-5 Dear Ms. Scopaz: Further to your letter of August 15, 1997, we are enclosing our check, once again "Under Protest", to the order of the Town of Southold in the sum of $650.00. This check represents the sum you advise is due for the consultant's review of the EAF. We would appreciate your arranging for the work to commence as soon as possible. v~/'" ~ Matthew E. Pachman MEP: js Ene. - Check #2355 ri:')o rn ml ~ B~ ~ G0"\ !U)r---- ---'lilll: l " ,,!i.! r\! ^UG 2 ! 1991~!!ji ,hi L~_._.._.,.-_J SOU1>,OI.,;) .! '/i'VN PlANN(ioIG BOARD ,-,-~-_.>_.,'~..,.- . .~>~UFF04O-~ 1f~.~ C'a ~-, .)~ ~ ': ,~:;:, ~, '.J Q ~ ~.' Cf.) :.i!: ~~, ~~ ~:. ~ (:)~. ~~~.:: ~tJ./ + ~~~~;:' -~.....:z::--~-=-~c:-..r . /::A..vb-!,(h'_ . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR, RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 15, 1997 Matthew E. Pachman Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, NY 11 725 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Telecommunications Tower Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc. Main Road, Orient SCTM # 1000-018-6-5 1. Review Fee for Long Environmental Assessment Review. 2. Estimate for Review Fee for Part III, of the Long EAF. Dear Mr. Pachman, This is to acknowledge that I am in receipt of your letter of August 4th, in which you enclosed a check for $500 which coupled with a previous payment of $ 350 equals the $850 environmental review fee for the Environmental Assessment Form of April 1997. Understanding that this last check was sent "under protest", it is my unfortunate responsibility to remind you that $650 remains outstanding for the NYNEX Orient site. As noted in,the July 15th letter, a copy of which is attached for your convenience, the fee for the consultant's review of Part III of the Long EAF is in addition to the original fee. The Part III document is already in the hands of Nelson, Pope & Voorhis and work will commence upon receipt of the check. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. srerely, - !I~;;'~- Valerie s.;;~r 7 Town Planner cc: Richard Weyhreter, Real Estate Manager, BANM Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, ZBA . 3E:--:~-C:T":' ORLOWSKI. JR. Chairman . PL~:-i;:'i1:-iG BO.">.RD :VIE:\1BERS V.'1L:...L-Lvl J. CRE:V1ERS ~0r~ETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE L.;,TIL~yl. JR RICKARD G. W.-\RD Town Hall. 53095 ),[ain Road ?O. 30x 1179 Sour:nold. ~.ew York !.1971 ra.'1: :'.:;: 16) 765.:3136 Telephone (S16) 765-1938 PL\.i.....1'IlNG BOARD OFFICE TOVVN OF SOUTHOLD July 15, 1997 Matthew E. Pachman Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Cammack, NY 11725 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Telecommunications Tower Beil Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc., Main Road, Orient SCTM # 1000-018-6-5 1. Review Fee for Long Environmental Assessment Review. 2. Estimate for Review Fee for Part III, of the Long EAF. Dear Mr. Pachman, I am in receipt of your letter of June 30th, in which you enclosed a check for partial payment of the environmental review fee for the above-feferenced site. After being briefed by Ms. Spiro, with whom you spoke on the telephone, and discussing the situation with the Planning Board, I have been asked to respond as follows. The Planning Board declines to accept partial payment of $350 for environmental review fees of $850 inasmuch as this is a cost of reviewing the application which is not covered by ,the site plan application fee. The lower cost of reviewing the Cutchogue site reflects the fact that that review was conducted several years ago during the winter of 1991-92. Fees have been increased since that time. As for the difference in fee estimates between the Orient site and the Mattituck site, the consultant's fees do vary depending on the degree of complexity or review that may be evident at different sites and by different proposals. Finally, as a municipality we are charged a more competitive rate than is found in the private sector. The Part III oithe Long EAF has been sent to our consultant for an estimate of the review fee. The estimated fee includes the review of the Part III document and the preparation of findings. The fee for this review will be an additional $650. Upon receipt of payment of that amount. we will authorize Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC to proceed with the Part III document. Tr'cJsting thiS wlil resolve your concerns about the fee amounlS. Slr,cerely. (!~.'/' ~,Lt'd. ..- ----'--""'IV-: Valerie Scocaz' ~ ~::'.Vri P!arrer . . ~ Pi> flllf-. JuDIV . PACHMAN. PACHMAN & BROWN. P. C. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY CQMMACK. NEW YORK ~I725 (516) 543-2200 TELEGOPIER (516) 543-2271 HOWARD E. PACHMAN MATTHEW E. PACHMAN KAREN R. BROWN. COUNSEL HARVEY B. BESUNDER PATRICK A. SWEENEY AMEL R. MASSA 'N."lO )>,OMITTED IN NEW .JERSIIT August 4, 1997 Valerie Scopaz, Director of Planning Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 cne-JC- iY'. rJ.J1.fJ.iU.!'^- RE: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile ("BANM") Cellular Telephone Tower - Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Ms. Scopaz: I am in receipt of your correspondence, dated July 15, 1997. Notwithstanding the failure to provide a detailed explanation of how the $850.00 environmental review fee was arrived at, in an effort to prevent any further improper delay on behalf of the Town with respect to this application, I enclose a check in the amount of $500.00. This payment is made "under protest." This, coupled with the $350.00 check sent on June 30, 1997, totals the $850.00 you requested. I trust you will now expedite the review of this application. very truly yours, ~1~~ MEP/blb enclosure cc: Richard Weyhreter, Real Estate Manager, BANM Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairperson, Board of Zoning Appeals Town of Southold Planning Board 00'.. ~ ~) ~ w ~l~l . AUG 51997 JI I r.:J SOUTHOlD TOWN PlANNING BOARD ...orient-p.nyn\scopaz.lt3 - T . . WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. JR. RICHARD G. WARD , --:":__~__-;~-;c__ .j.y~i\lHOl.t;~c. {.r~~.-";. .. '.~ ~O'.' ~., ." ~ ~~.' ~-~-'- + f- --<-_'-::::--....:.':;c;~.J- Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. Chairman PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 15, 1997 Matthew E. Pachman Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, NY 11725 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Telecommunications Tower Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc., Main Road, Orient SCTM # 1000-018-6-5 1. Review Fee for Long Environmental Assessment Review. 2. Estimate for Review Fee for Part III, of the Long EAF. Dear Mr. Pachman, I am in receipt of your letter of June 30th, in which you enclosed a check for partial payment of the environmental review fee for the above-referenced site. After being briefed by Ms. Spiro, with whom you spoke on the telephone, and discussing the situation with the Planning Board, I have been asked to respond as follows. The Planning Board declines to accept partial payment of $350 for environmental review fees of $850 inasmuch as this is a cost of reviewing the application which is not covered by the site plan application fee. The lower cost of reviewing the Cutchogue site reflects the fact that that review was conducted several years ago during the winter of 1991-92. Fees have been increased since that time. As for the difference in fee estimates between the Orient site and the Mattituck site, the consultant's fees do vary depending on the degree of complexity or review that may be evident at different sites and by different proposals. Finally, as a municipality we are charged a more competitive rate than is found in the private sector. The Part III of the Long EAF has been sent to our consultant for an estimate of the review fee. The estimated fee includes the review of the Part III document and the preparation of findings. The fee for this review will be an additional $650. Upon receipt of payment of that amount, we will authorize Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC to proceed with the Part III document. Trusting this will resolve your concerns about the fee amounts, Shy:erely, Idb/~J~f&1 Valerie ~~/~ Town Planner . ~ ,-'::.. ;-~':' :e,.::,:Cr 1 Svl: f\. ~. . , ~...c 1IJj,-- v' NELSON, POP~ & VC:JORHIS, LI..C (rr . :;: '" 'f ' :::: :"." .....-, ~ ,.,. 7" A '- . C" '- _.::. :', "" ........:. . ,:; ~ "">i S "< s ..... -- ~ _1~1 ::EP_ ,.\1::-:'- .;';;T~VR : ,,(;e:~~E::; i:-E. . '{I~ ~-E . .I~S€.?... F'l Ei'"!FA...'..... P:O . 'IOS:;:R'" . C"IRSTCPHE" w ~O' SC'N!Of: To: From: Dale: Rfi: Melissa Spiro Charles Yoo 's July I, 1991 . Bell Atlantic 1 YNEX Mobile - Orient SCTM IJ 1000-18-6-5 ....By FAX ONt Y -ONE (1) PAGE 765-3136.... Dear Melissa: As per your request. this letter provides a propo.oal for services with regard to the above project. ~'P&V will perform environmental planning consulting services relative to the above referenced project Services include. review the Part III Environmental Assessment Form submitted on behalf of the applicant, and preparation of a letter outlining the findings of the review. The fee for these services is 565000 Please Ie! me know if you wish us to pro(:eed with this project. I have a copy of rhe report and can commence thIS project upon notice. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and please call if you have any questions. m @~ow~m JUL (1997: LSI' - .~ SOliTHCu_: 1 uvm PLANNiNG BOARD 572 \....,.;:,.L-:--.I\.I-oITMAr.J ~CAD :'v'GL'/rL~e:. N'? ~ '''4'''-2:~ae (51 6J -1a"-5SiS~ . ;<AX (5181427-5820 . . PACHMAN. PACHMAN & BROWN. P. C. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK, NEW YORK 11725 (516) 543-2200 TELECOPIER (516) 543-2271 HOWARD E. PAGHMAN MATTHEW E. PAGHMAN KAREN R. BROWN. COUNSEL HARVEYB. BESUNDER PATRICK A. SWEENEY '.-\1.S0 .-\DMITTED IN NEW JI'RS"", June 30, 1 Valerie Scopaz, Director Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 of Planning ~ JUL I 1997 rnill~OW~ RE: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile ("BANM") Cellular Telephone Tower - Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Ms. scopaz: I am in receipt of your letter to Richard Weyhreter of BANM, dated May 16, 1997. Pursuant to your conversations with Howard Pachman of this office, it is my understanding that the last time New York SMSA Limited Partnership applied to the Southold Board of Zoning Appeals for a special exception approval to construct a public utility communications facility within the hamlet of Cutchogue, the consultant's bill for reviewing the Environmental Assessment Form ("EAF") was $350.00. Enclosed please find a check in the sum of $350.00 to cover the reasonable cost of this review. If this does not resolve the issue, please provide me with a detailed explanation as to why the cost for the consultant's review of the present EAF has risen by two hundred fifty (250%) percent. v.rY~Yours. MATTHE E. PACHMAN MEP/blb enclosure cc: Richard weyhreter, Real Estate Manager, BANM Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairperson, Board of Zoning Appeals Town of Southold Planning Board ...orient-p.nyn\scopaz.lt2 Sui, t~ 6' eMS ill . . St,t., . iJ ~ liS /l1S' PACHMAN. PACHMAN & BROWN. P. C. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK. NEW YORK I 1725 (516) 543-2200 TELECOPIER (516) 543-2271 HOWARD E. PACHMAN MATTHEW E. PAGHMAN KAREN R. BROWN'" COUNSEL 'ALSO .-\DMITTEO IN NEW JEFlSE:Y HARVEY B. BESUNDER PATRICK A. SWEENEY June 20, 1997 Valerie Scopaz Director of Planning Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 00 rn@rnnwrn 00 JlJN. 2 3 I1lJr SOUT.I:t9.~D TOWN PlANNING BOARD Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Long Environmental Assessment Form for Proposed Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile ("BANM") Public Utility Cellular Communications Facility 24850 Main Road. Orient. New York Dear Ms. Scopaz and Planning Board Members: Enclosed herewith is the Part III Environmental Assessment Form for the above referenced project. Please note that specific objection is taken to inquiry concerning any alleged "cumulative impacts" this project might have. There is simply no legal basis for requiring such an analysis. However, in an attempt to overcome any efforts to delay approval of this project, we have, under protest, submitted certain information with respect to this issue. The report by Nelson Pope & Voorhis, dated April 22, 1997, states in pertinent part: In addition to these site specific impacts of the proposed project, the cumulative impacts of the proposed project must be considered. Approval of the proposed project will set a precedent for approval of other tower sites within the Town. Without proper planning, this would result in a significant intrusion on the rural nature of the community. The . . Page 2 Valerie Scopaz and Town of Southold Planning Board June 20, 1997 proposed project should be considered in the context of an overall plan for the siting of communication structures so as to minimize potential impacts on land use and visual resources. If the Town Board agrees to allow these structures within the Town, their locations should be carefully chosen to minimize the number of towers and identify the optimal sites. The current application should not be considered without investigation of the cumulative impacts of the proposed project. Predicating a cumulative impact analysis upon the alleged precedent that the approval of this public utility tower might set within the town for other towers is clearly an abuse of the SEQRA process. Any future projects would clearly be independent unrelated activities needing individual determinations of significance. For a cumulative impact analysis to be required, there must be some nexus between the actions sought to be considered together. Either a cause and effect relationship between the actions, or a common proponent should be present. Even mere simultaneous occurrence is not enough. The predicate for a cumulative impact study is found in 6 NYCRR 617.7 (c) (1) (xii) when "...two or more related actions undertaken, funded or approved by an agency, none of which have or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria in this subdivision." Any future applications for public utilities communications facilities within the town other than the two applications already pending would thus not be "related actions". The only time actions have been deemed related by the courts was when the pending projects have common ownership, are part of a larger plan designed to resolve conflicting specific environmental concerns in a subsection of the municipality with special environmental significance, or are on adjoining parcels. Villaqe of Westburv v. Deoartment of Transoortation, 75 N.Y.2d 62, 550 N.Y.S.2d 604, Save the Pine Bush Inc. v. The citv of Albanv, 70 N.Y.2d 193, 518 N.Y.S.2d 943, Chinese Staff and Workers Association v. Citv of New York, 68 N.Y.2d 359, 509 N.Y.S2d 499, Sun Comoanv. Inc. v. citv of Svracuse Industrial Develooment Aqencv, 209 A.D.2d 34, 625 N.Y.S.2d 371 and Seqal v. Town of Thomoson, 182 A.D.2d . . Page 3 Valerie Scopaz and Town of Southold Planning Board June 20, 1997 1043, 583 N.Y.S.2d 50. All of these cases had the presence of all three elements: (1) the projects were thought to have significant common impact, (2) projects were included in a common plan or policy and (3) the projects were specifically identified. None of the criteria are present in this case. The report by Mr. Voorhis alleging cumulative impacts is of course entirely conclusionary with no showing of any common plan or the existence or likelihood of any significant cumulative adverse impact. Please be advised that my client will strongly oppose anv attempt to misuse the SEQRA process to impose requirements or conditions on a selective basis against BANM. ve!i. truly yours, ~.,-=:> MATTH W . PAC~ MEP/blb enclosure ...orient-p.nyn\scopaz.ltl . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G. WARD . GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~'~ ~.,.". ,,::, ~.~ I Q . ::: '" =e ~' ~ ~,7 ~. ~.::' ~~~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 26, 1997 Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 RE: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - Orient SCTM# 100-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Voorhis: Enclosed is the Part III Environmental Assessment Form and a letter dated June 20, 1997 from Matthew Pachman in regard to the above mentioned site plan application. Please develope a cost estimate for review of this information. "'- On May 13, 1997, the Planning Board adopted a resolution "That the applicant submit documentation of need and detailed information about the proposed mitigation measures including elevation drawings and artist's renderings and other designs which may be more in character with the neighborhood that will enable the completion of Part 3 (Evaluation of the Importance of Impacts). I have enclosed' a copy of the Board's resolution. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the above or if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Planner enc!. .:::.. ~-- . . .?- E->.CHYI.->.:--i. P_->.GHMA:-.r& BROW:--i. P_C. .......TTOR:--:EYS 366 VETER.........;-..iS ME:--10RI.......L HIGHW""",-'l' CO~!:--I.......G;... :"E\'o'YORK i ;7'25 (5]6) .343<2:200 TELECOprER (516l 5...j.3.2271 COU:-'=SEL HOW.......RD E. PACHl"L....N .V1ATTHEW E. ?ACH:-l......." K.....RE:-J R. BRowN- H.......R\.Ey 9. 9ESUNDER P.....TRICK....... SWEE:-lEY .o,Lso..w.....r,..TED"',.(w.JERSO" June 20, 1997 Valerie Scopaz Director of Planning Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 i:'\ ;; \ \ Q) '-- \\U~!\ \ u\ \ I \ ? '":: - ~ ~- '::f:"~ : SOU1HOLD iOW~ PLANNING 80,,,0 RE: Long Environmental Assessment Form for proposed Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile ("BANM") Public utility Cellular communications Facility 24850 Main Road. Orient. New York -< Dear Ms. Scopaz and planning Board Members: Encl~ed herewith is the Part III Environmental ,!l._ssessment Form for the above referenced project. Please note that specific objection is taken to inquiry concerning any alleged "cumulative impacts" this project might have. There is simply no legal basis for requiring such an analysis. However, in an attempt to overcome any efforts to delay approval of this project, we have, under protest, submitted certain information with respect to this issue. The report by Nelson Pope & Voorhis, dated April 22, 1997, states in pertinent part: In addition to these site specific impacts of the proposed project, the cumulative impacts of the proposed proj ect must be cons idered. Approval of the proposed proj ect will set a precedent for approval of other tower sites within the Town. without proper planning, this would result in a significant intrusion on the rural nature of the community. The . . Page 2 Valerie Scopaz and Town of Southold Planning Board June 20, 1997 proposed project should be considered in the context of an overall plan for the siting of communication structures so as to minimize potential impacts on land use and visual resources. If the Town Board agrees to allow these structures within the Town, their locations should be carefully chosen to minimize the number of towers and identify the optimal sites. The current application should not be considered without investigation of the cumulative impacts of the proposed project. Predicating a cumulative impact analysis upon the alleged precedent that the approval of this public utility tower might set within the town for other towers is clearly an abuse of the SEQRA process. Any future projects would clearly be independent unrelated activities needing individual determinations of significance. For a cumulative impact analysis to be required, there must be some nexus between the actions sought to be considered together. Either a cause and effect relationship between the actions, or a common proponent should be present. Even mere simultaneous occurrence is not enough. ff The predicate for a cumulative impact study is found in 6 NYCRR 617.7 (c) (1) (xii) when "... two or more related actions undertaken, funde~ or approved by an agency, none of which have or would have a significant impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or more of the criteria in this sUbdivision." Any future applications for public utilities communications facilities within the town other than the two applications already pending would thus not be "related actions". The only time actions have been deemed related by the courts was when the pending projects have common ownership, are part of a larger plan designed to resolve conflicting specific environmental concerns in a subsection of the municipality with special environmental significance, or are on adjoining parcels. Villaoe of Westburv v. Department of Transportation, 75 N. Y. 2d 62, 550 N.Y.S.2d 604, Save the Pine Bush Inc. v. The Citv of Albanv, 70 N.Y.2d 193, 518 N.Y.S.2d 943, Chinese Staff and Workers Association v. city of New York, 68 N.Y.2d 359, 509 N.Y.S2d 499, Sun Companv. Inc. v. City of Syracuse Industrial Development Aqency, 209 A.D.2d 34,625 N.Y.S.2d 371 and Seoal v. Town of Thompson, 182 A.D.2d . . Page 3 Valerie Scopaz and Town of Southold Planning Board June 20, 1997 1043, 583 N.Y.S.2d 50. All of these cases had the presence of all three elements: (1) the projects were thought to have significant common impact, (2) projects were included in a common plan or policy and (3) the projects were specifically identified. None of the criteria are present in this case. The report by Mr. Voorhis alleging cumulative impacts is of course entirely conclusionary with no showing of any common plan or the existence or likelihood of any significant cumulative adverse impact. Please be advised that my client will strongly oppose guy attempt to misuse the SEQRA process to impose requirements or conditions on a selective basis against BANM. Ver~ truly yours, ~\,\r- ~ MATTH~. PAC~ MEP/blb en'flosure "" .. .orient-p.nyn\scopaz.ltl . -~fJ~~~ffai;0~- ~ . ,.'- ~,-- ;~ ' - : ~- .,:t: - -.. '~ .,;.0 -- ': ,:;::; -.,0 '.' ~... ~o~ .. _.:::0::::'':- --=0-. -'!l" :-_-- -~=-----_. --~- ------ . PLA.'<-~'iI:'iG BOARD ~1E:'YIBERS ChalMlan T,.)\....n ::rail. 53095 :vfalr. Road P.O. Box 1179 3our;holci. >lew York 1.19il Fa....:: i_516i 765.;3:36 Taiephone ,"S16) 76.5-i938 3E~'-~<Z:'T ORLO\~;SKI. JR. 1Nl:"'i...L~vl J. CRE)..fERS KE:-1:\fETH L. ED\VARDS GEORGE RITCHIE L~TI'L..\.:.'vL JR. 'lICEARD G. WARD PL-\i'li'lli'lG BOARD OFFICE TO~ OF SOCTHOLD May 13,1997 Matthew Pachman, Esq_ Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P_C_ 366 Veterans Memorial Hwy_ Cammack, NY 11725 Re: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile -. Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr Pachman: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 12,1997: VVHEREAS the Planning Board has reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment Form, dated April 2, 1997 and an addendum dated May 9,1997. , "and -f of WHEREAS it has reviewed the comments of its environmental consultant, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC, dated April 22, 1997 and May 8, 1997, and """" WHEREAS this review has indicated that the proposed monopole height is 84 feet, and that the visual impacts of the proposed monopole on the surrounding countryside are likely to be significant, and WHEREAS, the applicant has not submitted documentation of need, and WHEREAS the proposed project presents a potential land use conflict with the community's vision for the Orient area, and, WHEREAS the project sponsor has not provided site specific mitigation measures relevant to the application before the Planning Board, and, WHEREAS the Planning Board wishes to prepare Part 3 of the Long Environmental Assessment Form in order to more cioselv consider the significance of potential land use conflicts, visual intrusion and cumulative impacts of the proposed project, be It therefcre RESOLVED Ti'l21 the Soulhcid Town Planning Board_ acting under (r,e State . . ?3ge 2 Site pian fer Sell AtlantIc NYNEX NIcolle - Cnent May 13. '997 Environmental Quality Review Act, as the lead agency makes a determination that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action, and BE iT Further RESOLVED That the applicant submit documentation or need and detailed inrormation about the proposed mitigation measures including elevation drawings and artist's renderings and ather designs which may be more in character with the neighborhood that will enable the completion or Part 3 (Evaluation of the Importance of Impacts). Be it Further RESOLVED That ir the applicant chooses not to provice this inrormation the Planning Board may prepare a Part 3 at the applicant's expense. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, -:::< ./' /7 '",i'71..-~--cr:- c.vL.~~".-a-?..G / 7///S Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chainman . cc: Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning NYSDEC - Stony Brook 11 NYSDEC - Albanv New York State Deoartment or State Suffolk County Department or Public Works .,.,1"Iew York State Department or Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority . /flJ1Z)}].':>.-;,>, ,(!fJ~ '1.\lHOl.f d">,; AIY~.'\;.~";; V" ~ :::, ;-<. o . en "'" ~ ~ \1tu- ~.) 'c,. './.. i'flll '. >~~ /1 j "<?)ri(f . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BEKNETT ORLOWSKI, JR Chairman WILLIAM .J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR ftICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Judith Terry, Town Clerk FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: FOIL Request: Pachman, Pachman & Brown Date: May 27, 1997 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 SouthoId, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 As per Mr. Pachman's request of May 19, 1997, attached are copies of "resolutions, decisions, and/or determinations by the Town of Southold Planning Board with respect to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA)", "and all Planning Department and consultants' recommendations, memorandum, reports, or other writings with respect thereto."". (SEQRA) (emphasis added) ., . --~;::::::.:.-:::::::-~--. ;~~.~-~\lFFOL,f ~~.~ ;~. ~:, J == - ~ '::.c --iQ . ~ CI) :ie': ~.~ ~ ."''k.- ~. ~!(IJ + ~':~~c'~' -;;>--<""~,:::-.:;"_'L...- . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCIDE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 16,1997 Richard Weyhreter Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile 60 Herricks Rd. Mineola, NY 11501 Re: Cellular Telephone Tower - Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Weyhreter: Attached please find our environmental consultant's bill for reviewing the Environmental Assessment Form for the above referenced proposal. Please submit a check made out to the Town of Southold, in the amount of $850.00 to cover this expense. Sincerely, 1:::::'1) Town Planner enc. ~",~-. _lc,-::,':r~":' .~::<:-=:.:. ::E_::.-' ::::::P~ . ,_,_,-, . NEL.SON, PO~ & "OI.9AI-41&, L.L.~ <"",'O"MeN'~" .CANN"" . ,"ON"'.'''O ,"^",,, "00"",,,:,0 .,CP. ""HUR " ,.o..e'"" . "NO<"' G OON""c'" '"COR ..o,p, . ,0sEp" .. .,,"N,O ,S . ROO<" Co ,.,'ON)'" . C~P.\STO?'HE.F\'N flOP.lINSO'l. pf. ~ To: Fro"': DQje: Re: Valene Scopu Chic Voorhis ~y 16, 199 Bell A.t1antic ....By FA-X ONLY -ONE (1) p,\GE _516-765-3136.... Dear Valerie: Th< f<< yOU "" W~ fin'. pl_ """, "," ,"'" ou' ,h< ",~i ",,," " ,,,,,,,,ud. "" ,..ow '" '" """ ""oN. EAf "",'W. .,Id ,,,,poct'OU w i p""~ consultation, is $850.00. ""'" yOU "" "" ,pportU"'~ '" ".. you wi" ,"" P'~~' wi pl_ ,,11 if yOU "'~ any questions. toJ-etJ.- 5'111.1'll .,. '{:: MAY I 6 t9!JT SOUT~OLDTO\V~.-J PlANNING BOARD ,,72 WAC T WH,TMP.N ..OAO. M"CV"-L.", NY 11747' '5',51 427.l;SIi5 FA'" t" 1 el 427' TOTAL fj . NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL' PLANNING CONSULTING . ~ f'e, liS 527 WALT WHITMAN ROAD MELVILLE, N.Y. 11747 (516) 427-5655 FAX (516) 427-5620 Southold, Town of Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 B. Orlowski Invoice No : 97127.001 Customer No: 97127.0 Date: 05/13/97 Re: Be1l Atlantic Mobi1e ================================================================================ Review Environmenta1 Assessment Form for Planning Board per verbal authorization. 850.00 Total: $850.00 r........--:---.] II" R ([ill~ [i: II 1'\il r;; r ~t !.5 ~ Lr: Ii \ b I" f. i ~ r.--........:...~--"~.' In I 'I ~)\ '. lj J 1 \" " ':1". ' t ' l/ ~ " ; . " j ,I rUUi MAY I 4'.it.... i ~ L.. . ._,.~.." '- . . . Southold Town Planning Board 13 May 12,1997 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to re-endorse the plans dated November 6,1991, and March 16, 1992, subject to a one year review from date of building permit. Mr. Cremers: Second the motion. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? Motion carried. (Chairman re-endorsed survey.l *************** SITE PLANS - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALI1Y REVIEW ACT Determinations: Mr. Orlowski: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - This site plan is for a cellular telephone tower facility to be located on a 4,530 square foot section of a 10.5 acre lot located on the south side of State Route 25; 375 feet east of Platt Road in Orient. SCTM# 1000-18-6-5. Does anybody here want to address this? Matthew Pachman: Pachman, Pachman and Brown. 366 Veterans Memorial Hwy., Commack, NY, representing the applicant Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile. Members of the Board, we respectfully request the resolution declaring this an unlisted action with a Negative Declaration. I do know that the Town's environmental consultant has prepared a memorandum. I have not had a chance to see that. I did request that of your Town Planner. We did send in a letter dated April 10th which responded to some of the comments of the environmental consultant with respect to some of the specific questions. We clarified that this is in fact a request for an 84 foot monopole tower and not a 100 foot monopole tower. There apparently was some confusion initially. We noted in that letter of April 1 0, 1997 that the four other applications for towers within the Town, the one on the Young property which was a 104 foot monopole for NYNEX Mobile; the one on Elijah's Lane in Mattituck, which was a 100 foot monopole that was a Metro One application; and the NY Telephone tower that is 90 foot high on the Main Rd. in Cutchogue. They . . Southold Town Planning Board 14 May 12.1997 all received Negative Declarations. If the Board has any specific questions or is considering anything other than what I mentioned, we do have our environmental consultant, Theresa Elkowitz here tonight and we would be willing to discuss with you any of the criteria under the implementing regulations. I'm certainly available to answer any questions from the Board also. Mr. Orlowski: Anyone else have any comments? Does the Board have any comments at this time? Mr. ard: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to offer the following resolution. WHERE S the Planning Board has reviewed the Long Environmental Assessm t Form, dated April 2, 1997 and an addendum dated May 7,1997, and WHEREAS it h reviewed the comments of its environmental consultant, Nelson, Pope & oorhis, LLC, dated April 22, 1997 and May 9,1997, and WHEREAS this revi has indicated that the proposed monopole height Is 84 feet, and that the visl,Jal impacts of the proposed monopole on the surrounding countryside are likely to be significant, and , WHEREAS, the applicant has not submitted documentation of need, and WHEREAS the proposed project presents a potential land use conflict with the community'S vision for the Orient area, and, WHEREAS the project sponsor has no't,provlded site specific mitigation measures relevant to the application before the Planning Board, and, WHEREAS the Planning Board wishes to prepare Part 3 of the Long Environmental Assessment Form in order to more closely consider the significance of potential land use conflicts, visual intrusion and cumulative impacts of the proposed project, be it therefore RESOLVED That the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, as the lead agency makes a determination that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action, and \ BE IT Further RESOLVED That the applicant submit docum~ntation of need and detailed information about the proposed mitigation m~asures Including , . "LTZC<-~ . J/'o;,UfFDl.t .~ ,;.y~.~ t'a~.,.. .;~ . ~ < i.J;:) ~ " :~ Q . . ':,; :s rn ;e ::; ~,~ ~~'; S. (;:).J~ . ~ .y - ''>t. S;)~ ." ~I}f + ~~LC~;'- ~.::-z:-~--r..,-<- Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 1- PLANN"ING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR Chairman WILLIAM J. CRE:-.1ERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR RICHARD G. WARD May 13,1997 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Matthew Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Hwy. Commack, NY 11725 Re: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Pachman: The following resolution was adopted by the South old Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 12,1997: WHEREAS the Planning Board has reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment Form, dated April 2, 1997 and an addendum dated May 9,1997, and WHEREAS it has reviewed the comments of its environmental consultant, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC, dated April 22, 1997 and May 8, 1997, and WHEREAS this review has indicated that the proposed monopole height is 84 feet, and that the visual impacts of the proposed monopole on the surrounding countryside are likely to be significant, and WHEREAS, the applicant has not submitted documentation of need, and WHEREAS the proposed project presents a potential land use conflict with the community's vision for the Orient area, and, WHEREAS the project sponsor has not provided site specific mitigation measures relevant to the application before the Planning Board, and, WHEREAS the Planning Board wishes to prepare Part 3 of the Long Environmental Assessment Form in order to more closely consider the significance of potential land use conflicts, visual intrusion and cumulative impacts of the proposed project, be it therefore RESOLVED That the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State . ). . . . Page 2 Site plan for Bell Mantic NYNEX Mobile _ Orient May 13, 1997 Environmental Quality Review Act, as the lead agency makes a determination that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action, and BE IT Further RESOLVED That the applicant submit documentation of need and detailed information about the proposed mitigation measures including elevation drawings and artist's renderings and other designs which may be more in character with the neighborhood that will enable the completion of Part 3 (Evaluation of the Importance of Impacts). Be It Further RESOLVED That if the applicant chooses not to provide this information the Planning Board may prepare a Part 3 at the applicant's expense. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, &-J!-1tCtt.- ~/ 0'//s Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority .-...-....,. -.... , ...., '-o'l..,"-, . .516 42"7'562C' P,C.: 03 . r.f; /5 NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLe !In Walt Whitman Road Melville. New York 11747 Facsimile Cover Sbeet (516) 427-5665 Fax: (516) 427-5620 To: Company; Phone: Fax; FROM: Re: Date: No. of Pages (including Cover): Comments: J., L A41LhnL.; ~/l-F ~/h(",5.'r~ . - ?4,c,e/F ~p~ ~"'" O~ <.SburrIrJt D '7,{., ')'"' ''9 J!3' 1.63. , l/ \::_ )/;err (? ~ti7(=X.Jt'/J 7S.,1/ +tIlL;; ~ tJ/C'-1 '1 I "-- 9 . () ,/ /:ilj~- :... &?1... 6. Ii' -f,. {..f/ -e -r a //::t.v "' / /d/'k-' = _ --n<-~ ~ . r."','...",",,,_,, ~ H_' N" ...,.... ~.,_. ....__"'_ ,~._.~ _ :,; \ ; Ii ~4 .' 1, l"" 11'-" Ilr:: Ck MAY \,...11-,1 l_.._... , _C. " 'i ://. ['2 ,.:," 'i. II: " : I~ '" .... '.J 9 199-( M:::I'~'-C'~T~97 1 ~1:"":'1 ~jEL'::Dt I .2. PlJPE. LLP ':.lb 4d.,. '::,t;.2U 1-'. U":: U;; . NELSON, POPE & VC:)ORHIS, LLC ::('.jV "'O.";MS'-"';-,'"-L' F>"-....N,'\J'N:;:. C:::I\,l$'..JL'!";r--.~ ':':"I...F'~iS ,I VC,ORh:S ;;P to.(r>. "fl'Tr1WA~, ~.OE:<8Ef~ ?::: . v:NCft-;i (3 .::crlNEf.l.Y, ~E '.<:EI~ ..:;;;::]" "': . JO%P"'l R e,<I'FANIA P[ . RcseFlr C. !l:E:l.SCN. JI<, ?: . (~~~13TOPHi~ 'N R08~N$ON. PI!: May 9, 1997 !Vis. Valerie Scopaz Southold Town Plannmg Board 53095 Main Road Sourhold, NY 11971 Re; Bell Atlantic Mobile EAF SCTM# 1000-18-6- 5 Dear Valerie, We have received the comment letter ITom Theresa Elkowirz on the Bell Atlantic Mobile EAF This letter presents minor revisions to what were relatively minor comments or clarifications by our office, and does net change the primary conclusions presented in our letter of Afril 22, 1997 The proposed tower will present significant land use and ViSUal impacts, although the remaining impacts of the proposed project are likely to be minor The only substantive comment is that they have changed their plans slightly, and the proposed tower will be 84' rather than 100' in height The site quantities have also been r~vised. The project sponsor's initial E.A.F did nOt include alterations outside of the fenced area, including the gravel road. We assumed in our calculations that limited clearing would occur along the roadway and outside of the fence during construction. We probably overestimated, but the relLl tigures are probably slightly larger than presented in their comment letter As the ecological and topographic impacts were judged to be insigniticant even with our larger estimates, this corrmem is not substantive. It is true that the project sponsor will comrol only the 0.41 acres to be leased, and we acknowledge the comments made on page 3 of the comment letter Our corrections to the EM were intended to clarify the taCt that the proposed lease area is part of a larger parcel, and that the location of the proposed tower in the middle of the parcel will restrict development of the northern ponion of the parcel. Again, as long as the proposed projecr is understood as to be a lease of a small ponion of a larger parcel, these revisions are minor. We deter to the project sponsor on whether FCC approval would be required, as they should be familiar with these reqUIrements, Finally, we did not prepare a yield map to determine the yield of the parcel under ~72 WAl..T WHITMAN FtOA.C, MELVII..JaE. NY 1~74"+2'as (~1e) 427-5Se!:5 F'AX ':S16J 427-5G20 "~ '-~~.?- ~,~,?..... , '-.' -~-, '~E'_':/:::"; t:.iJl='E, L.Lo srE "':'2'";'-S5:';:U -P-. u;::'u":' . . existing zoning. Typically, constl1.Jction of an adequate access road would allow for only four parcels Oll a lot <)f this size, bUt we defer to the project sponsor if their map conform:' to code In summary, the comments provided by the project sponsor are minor, and there should be no need for further revision of the EAF The basic land use issues discussed in our letter remain as substantial concerns, and the conclusIons are not altered by rhe project sponsor' s comments Please call if you have further questions. Thank you. ~~, ~c7oa~ Nikki Coffey Tousley ~ NELSON, POPE, .~ VOORHIS IIIIbY NELSON. ~pe & VOOflllll)oool15. l...LC ENVIAQNV'oENT A.. . ~_;,......r'nNG . CON$l..I~ T1N~ TOTAL P,OJ . ...._--~~-......... --.~---'--~"----- Fax # . . . ~t'>P,/ VALERIE SCOPAZ TOWN PLANNER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Re: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Applications #4446SE and #4446V located on a parcel on the south side of SR 25, approximately 375 feet east of Platt Road, Orient, NY SCTM # 1000-018-6-5 Date: May 7, 1997 On April 15, 1997, the Zoning Board requested the preparation of "a brief report identifying existing and proposed land use issues relevant to the district and adjacent districts thereto, of the proposed NYNEX Cellular Telephone Tower site at 24850 Main Road, Orient. " The following is submitted in response to your request. Zoning: and the Goals and Objectives of Master Plan: The subject property is zoned Low-Density Residential R-80, a two-acre, residential zoning district. The purpose of this district, as defined by the Zoning Code (Section 100-30) is "to reasonably control and, to the extent possible, prevent the unnecessary loss of those currently open lands within the town containing large and contiguous areas of prime agricultural soils which are the basis for a significant portion of the town's economy and those areas with sensitive environmental features, including aquifer recharge areas and bluffs. In addition, these areas provide the open rural environment so highly valued by year-round residents and those persons who support the Town of Southold's . . recreation, resort and second-home economy. The economic, social and aesthetic benefits which can be obtained for all citizens by limiting loss of such areas are well documented and have inspired a host of governmental programs designed, with varying degrees of success, to achieve this result. For its part, the town is expending large sums of money to protect existing farm acreage. At the same time, the town has an obligation to exercise its authority to reasonably regulate the subdivision and development of this land to further the same purposes while honoring the legitimate interests of farmers and other farmland owners." In keeping with this statement, the Zoning Code permits as of right the following uses: one family detached dwellings, agricultural operations including wineries and structures owned or operated by the Town or its school, park and fire districts. The Code also permits by Special Exception: "Public utility rights-of-way as well as structures and other installations necessary to serve areas within the town, subject to such conditions as the Board of Appeals may impose in order to protect and promote the health, safety, appearance and general welfare of the community and the character of the neighborhood in which the proposed structure is to be constructed." The purpose of this district as defined in the Code reflects the goals and objectives of the Town's comprehensive Master Plan which is perhaps best expressed by this statement on Overall Planning goals found in the Master Plan Update: Summary. (Raymond, Parish, Pine, & Weiner, Inc. April 1985. Page 3.): "Maximize the Town's natural assets, including its coastal location and agricultural base and achieve a compatibility between the natural environment and develop men t . " The Stewardship Task Force's Final Report of 1994 refined this concept further. The Report stressed the importance of preserving the scenic rural and agricultural qualities of the Town's landscape not only to preserve the high quality of life enjoyed by the residents, but also to protect the underpinnings of the tourist industry. Tourism, along with agriculture and maritime industries, is a significant and growing part of the local economy. "The tourist industry depends in large part on preserving and improving the physical beauty of the Town." (Final Report: Executive Summary. July 1994. Page 4.) In keeping with this observation, the Report recommended the adoption of scenic corridors and the placement of recreational trails throughout the town. .. . "T ~ ~ .-e ~ ,! ~ ~ 'i!1 <t i~ ~: J ~' ~I - '3 '1. ~i ' ">; r- 02' ! 1/.. ~ ~ ~, ~ f!~ ~' :; 1_ '\i 'I i>,!1 <\(1 : ~I <t: ~ "-I <:: ~ S , K . 'r I -f1 s: :j - ,~ '>. ~ ~#..8 ~ !>. ' ,.. " ~ <:O't dcg \) <t~. (j' " ~ s:: Vi - '3:)" , v S S::' ,,\ ~ ~f2 -jp~1:) g-'0 ~ _ ,~ ~ ~.:9 "'1:5~ eo- ~~ B-P &c+- - '::l Q \.0 .',\', ?J\lX \\,>2I?{X\ ~ \', "', '. " " ""- "'-" " '- '" .,.~ '\ .~. ~\ '., ,<,,~ .;},""~, 1 'i~ \ \ \ \ '\ \~ //1 ,-... /"\ . -:;::=::;.:::::::::::--=~ f/~~\lFFOl.t ~'" ..~.<:<.~ i~ ~~ :s= :...c. ~ '; _ . N J(/) ~."i ',,", "'~ , e::> """ " ",,,._ '-~V ",-_ 5:>"'~'C ~:Q.l + ~~v::/ ~z:--~- . pe, 5iM"P ~ z:owD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road cuj,+ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 VALERIE SCOPAZ TOWN PLANNER OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals Re: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner ~ Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Applications #4446SE and #4446V located on a parcel on the south side of SR 25, approximately 375 feet east of Platt Road, Orient, NY SCTM # 1000-018-6-5 From: Date: May 7, 1997 On April 15, 1997, the Zoning Board requested the preparation of "a brief report Identifying existing and proposed land use issues relevant to the district and adjacent districts thereto, of the proposed NYNEX Cellular Telephone Tower site at 24850 Main Road, Orient. " The following is submitted in response to your request. Zoning and the Goals and Objectives of Master Plan: The subject property is zoned Low-Density Residential R-80, a two-acre, residential zoning district. The purpose of this district, as defined by the Zoning Code (Section 100-30) is "to reasonably control and, to the extent possible, prevent the unnecessary loss of those currently open lands within the town containing large and contiguous areas of prime agricultural soils which are the basis for a significant portion of the town's economy and those areas with sensitive environmental features, including aquifer recharge areas and bluffs. In addition, these areas provide the open rural environment so highly valued by year-round residents and those persons who support the Town of Southold's . . recreation, resort and second-home economy. The economic, social and aesthetic benefits which can be obtained for all citizens by limiting loss of such areas are well documented and have inspired a host of governmental programs designed, with varying degrees of success, to achieve this result. For its part, the town is expending large sums of money to protect existing farm acreage. At the same time, the town has an obligation to exercise its authority to reasonably regulate the subdivision and development of this land to further the same purposes while honoring the legitimate interests of farmers and other farmland owners." In keeping with this statement, the Zoning Code permits as of right the following uses: one family detached dwellings, agricultural operations including wineries and structures owned or operated by the Town or its school, park and fire districts. The Code also permits by Special Exception: "Public utility rights-of-way as well as structures and other installations necessary to serve areas within the town, subject to such conditions as the Board of Appeals may impose in order to protect and promote the health, safety, appearance and general welfare of the community and the character of the neighborhood in which the proposed structure is to be constructed." The purpose of this district as defined in the Code reflects the goals and objectives of the Town's comprehensive Master Plan which is perhaps best expressed by this statement on Overall Planning goals found in the Master Plan Update: Summary. (Raymond, Parish, Pine, & Weiner, Inc. April 1985. Page 3.): "Maximize the Town's natural assets, including its coastal location and agricultural base and achieve a compatibility between the natural environment and development. " The Stewardship Task Force's Final Report of 1994 refined this concept further. The Report stressed the importance of preserving the scenic rural and agricultural qualities of the Town's landscape not only to preserve the high quality of life enjoyed by the residents, but also to protect the underpinnings of the tourist industry. Tourism, along with agriculture and maritime industries, is a significant and growing part of the local economy. "The tourist industry depends in large part on preserving and improving the physical beauty of the Town." (Final Report: Executive Summary. July 1994. Page 4.) In keeping with this observation, the Report recommended the adoption of scenic corridors and the placement of recreational trails throughout the town. . . Surrounding Land Uses: The area surrounding the subject property is a mix of residences, a residence for elderly people, farmland, an automobile service station, a fire house, an elementary school, a landscaper's yard and storage facilities. All of this property is zoned R-80 with the exception of two B Business properties (the service station and the storage facility). For your reference, attached is the 1995 Land Use Map produced by the Suffolk County Department of Planning and the 1993 aerial photograph of the area. The property is bordered on the east by farmland from which development rights have been purchased.. Several agricultural properties within the Orient area are included within Agricultural District # 1. One of six such districts with Suffolk County, property owners within the district receive reduced assessed value (and property taxes), exemption from special district levies and protection by right to farm legislation in return for which they commit themselves to farming the property for eight years. District # 1 was renewed in 1995 for the second time. See attached map for further details. Existing and Future Plans and Programs: Since 1995 the Town's Transportation Committee has designed and begun implementing the Seaview Trails network. The aforementioned map includes the location of two of these trails in the Orient area. The Committee is working with the Highway Superintendent to install trail signs in the near future. In March of 1997 the Town of Southold received permission to begin work on its Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan. Grant funds in the amount of $55,000 have been designated to develop an innovative model within a corridor management framework for the protection of scenic byway corridors and viewsheds, tourism development and recreation. The planning is being done under the aegis of the State Department of Transportation and in accordance with the federal scenic byways program. The funding is coming through the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) . A Request for Proposal was sent out to prospective consulting firms in April. A pre-submission conference is scheduled next week. A key feature of this Byway Corridor Management Plan is that it will inventory scenic, agricultural, cultural, historical, natural, recreational and archeological resources throughout the town. While the historic state (SR25) and county roads (CR48) and the railroad right-of-way are the main corridors, the plan will incorporate the entire viewshed visible from these and other road or trail corridors. Technical documentation about the Scenic Byways Corridor Management Plan is available in the Transportation Committee's files . . in the Town Clerk's office. Key documents are also available in my office. Finally, the Orient Historic District is located to the west of this site. Since information pertaining to this District has already been submitted to your record, I will simply reference it here. If additional documentation about the trails or byways program is needed, please let me know. . . -< fB ..J . f'" !I-.' PACHMAN. PACHMAN & BROWN. P. G. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK. NEWYORK 11725 (5161 543-2200 TELECOPIER (516) 543-2271 HOWARD E. PACHMAN MATTHEW E. PACHMAN KAREN R. BROWN- COUNSEL HARVEYB.BESUNDER PATRICK A. SWEENEY 'ALSO .-.DMTTTED IN "'o;w ..rERSlW May 7, 1997 VIA FACSIMILE AND BAHD DELIVERED Valerie scopaz, Director of Planning Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southo1d, New York 11971 RE: Environmental Assessment Form ("EAF") Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Proposed Monopole site 24850 Main street orient, Southold, NY (Orient-Phillips site) Dear Ms. Scopaz: Pursuant to your request, enclosed please find an addendum to the previously submitted EAF addressing the comments of the Town's consultant, which you faxed to my office earlier today. MATTH W E. PACHMAN MEP/blb enclosure ...orient-p.nynfscopaz.ltr MAY 8 199i . . FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. May 7, 1997 368 Veter... Memo..;.l Hip,w.y Commaek, New York 11725 Tel, (516) 499-2222 Fax, (516) 499-5928 TheresA Elkowitz, President Hugo D. Freudeuth.1 (Retieed-1994) Matthew Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, New York 11725 Re: Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Proposed Monopole Site 24850 Main Road Orient, Town of Southold Dear Mr. Pachman: Pursuant to your request and our discussions with representatives of the Town of Southold, we have reviewed the suggested modifications to the above-referenced EAF offered by the Town's consultant. This correspondence serves as an addendum to the previously submitted EAF and specifically addresses the consultant's comments. Page 2 Clarification of Proposed Project: The project sponsor, Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile (BANM) is proposing to lease an approximately 0.041 acre vacant area of an overall 10.54 acre parcel to construct an 84 foot monopole for cellular antennas and an associated 12 ft. by 40 ft. unmanned equipment shelter. Construction of a 0.068 acre gravel access drive is proposed on an easement area (that is !!ot part of the lease area). Thus, the Town consultant's assertion that implementation of the proposed action will affect 0.82 acres of the subject site is incorrect. Appropriate site data, including both the lease area and gravel drive,! follow: lIt should be understood that the area of the proposed gravel drive was modified upon consultation with the Planning Board which occurred subsequent to the preparation of the original EAF. Thus, the area to be impacted is somewhat different than that disclosed on the original EAF. . . Matthew Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown May 7, 1997 Page 2 A. Site Description 2. Total Acreage of Project Area: 10.54 acres Presently After Completion Former Agricultural Field and Nursery 10.54 acres 10.43 acres Unvegetated Gravel Access Drive 0.00 acres 0.068 acres *Roads, Buildings and Other Paved Surfaces 0.00 acres 0.041 acres *(equipment shelter and monopole) 3. b.) Haven soils are considered to be prime farmland mapping units. However, we defer to the comment of the Town's consultant relative to the actual group classification. 4. a. The response on the initially submitted EAF indicated that the depth to bedrock was greater than 400 feet below grade. The Town's consultant indicates that the depth to bedrock is 550 feet below grade surface. Given that the depth is hundreds of feet below grade surface, this comment is meaningless when considering potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposed action. Page 3 8. Water table elevation in the site vicinity is three feet above mean sea level (msl) according to Water Table Contours and Locations of Observation Wells in Suffolk County. New York, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Division of Environmental Quality, March 1995. The site elevation is 20 feet above InSI according to the U.S.G.S. Topographic Map, Orient Quadrangle. Depth to the water table would therefore be 20 feet minus three feet to equal 17 feet below grade surface. Thus, we are unclear as to the Town consultant's comment. . . Matthew Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown May 7, 1997 Page 3 B. Project Description 1. a.) The total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by the project sponsor, Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile (BANM) is 0.041 acres, which constitutes the area to be leased by BANM. An additional 0.068 acres are to be improved with a gravel access drive, which will serve as an access easement, but is not part of the lease area. The Town's consultant commented that the area under ownership is 10.54 acres. However, it must be understood that the question relates to property under the ownership or control of the project sponsor, which is BANM. Thus, it is our opinion that the consultant's comment does not relate to the question asked. b.) The project acreage to be developed both initially and ultimately (for this proposed action) is 0.11 acres, which includes both the 0.041 acre lease area and the 0.068 acre gravel access drive. I.) The dimensions of the largest proposed structure are as follows: the monopole will be 84 feet in height; the equipment shelter will be 12 ft. by 40 ft. Be advised that the height of the monopole was revised from 100 feet, which was initially proposed and reflected on the EAF, to 84 feet after consultations with the Planning Board (subsequent to EAF preparation). j.) The project is not situated along the public thoroughfare. The lease area is set back by more than 250 feet from Main Road. The width of the tax parcel (District 1000 - Section 18 - Block 6 - Lot 5) along Main Road, however, is 223.75 feet. If the Town's consultant wishes to consider the frontage of the entire 10.54 acre site, we have no objection as long as the lead agency is cognizant of the actual area to be leased by BANM. Page 4 4) Contrary to the comment of the Town's consultant, a total of 0.11 acres of vegetation (brush and weeds) will be removed from the site to accommodate both the construction of the gravel access drive and the equipment shelter and monopole. . . Matthew Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown May 7, 1997 Page 4 Page 5 25) Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board: At the time of EAF preparation, we were unaware that site plan approval was required. Federal Agencies: Contrary to the comment of the Town's consultant, an FCC permit/approval is not required. C. Zoning and Planning Information 3) The maximum potential development of the site if it is developed as permitted by the present zoning (R80) is five single-family residential homes on the overall 10.54 acre parcel pursuant to a sketch plan prepared by the applicant. The Town consultant's comment indicates that only four lots would be permitted. I hope that this addresses the outstanding questions. Should you wish to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me or Patricia Parvis of this office. Sincerely, FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. CJ.4~rA-- Theresa Elkowitz Principal TElba . po ..J'$a ~ NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL. PLANNING. CONSULTING CHARLES J VOORHIS, GEP, AICP . ARTHUR J. KOERBER, PE. . VINCENT G_ DONNEllY, P.E . VICTOR BERT, RE. . JOSEPH R. EPIFANIA, RE." ROBERT G, NELSON, JR. f'E . CHRISTOPHER W. ROBINSON, PE April 22, 1997 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 '1 '."7 r~ u '~ .s _~., M'..'_"......~.,~."~ .. ". Re: Review of EAF Bell Atlantic Special Use Permit for Public Utility Structure SCTM No. 1000-018-6-5 ? L1 Dear Mr. Ward: As per your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by NP&V, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Environmental and Planning Considerations The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The site consists of 10.54 acres ofIand in the hamlet of Orient in the Town of Southold. The subject site is located south ofNYS Route 25 approximately 375 east of Platt Road and has approximately 224 feet of frontage on NYS 25. The area of the site is zoned Single Family Residential 80, which would permit residential subdivision of the site with a minimum lot size of80,000 s.f. The proposed action involves an application for a special use permit to allow a public utility structure in order to construct a 100' monopole for a celIular telephone antenna. The pole would be approximately 2 feet in diameter. Page 1 157i2 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE. NY 11747-2188 (51 SJ 427-5885 FAX (51 Bl 427-5620 . II Atlantic Special Use pennit EAF Review Approximately 0.05 acres would be leased to the project sponsor, Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, for the antenna and a 466 s.f. equipment shelter. A gravel road would be constructed for access to the antenna, and a chain link fence would be installed around the facility to protect the antenna from vandalism. The project site is flat, and there are no wetlands or other significant landforms in the vicinity. The soils on site are entirely Haven Loam, slopes 0-2 percent. This soil series is suitable for development, with good leaching potential. Although Haven soils with shallow slopes are not classified within groups 1-4 of the NYS Agricultural Land Classification System, they are fertile agricultural soils which warrant preservation. The elevation of groundwater beneath the site is approximately 2 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the 1992 SCDHS map, and the topographic elevation is approximately 19 feet above msl. Thus, the depth to groundwater is approximately 17 feet below the surface. The proposed project will not require sanitary facilities, and the only impervious surface will be the roof of the proposed shelter. Thus, the impact on groundwater resources is expected to be negligible. The depth to groundwater is sufficient for residential development, and development under the existing R-80 zoning would be expected to result in only minimal impacts. The subject site is located within the Water Budget Area as mapped by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). The Water Budget Area includes those locations where there is sufficient groundwater to develop large public water supply wells. The subject site is also located in SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which covers the North Fork and portions of the South Fork. According to the North Fork Water Supply Plan (ERM- Northeast, Camp Dresser & McKee, 1983), the subject site is in an area significantly impacted by aldicarb (concentrations over 7 ug/l). In addition, nitrate contamination (concentrations over 8 ug/l) is present in an area to the east of the site. The entire site is abandoned agricultural land. Fallow field occupies most of the site, although there is an area of overgrown nursery stock to the south. The proposed structure will be located in the northern portion of the site near NYS 25, although a 300 foot setback from the road has been employed to allow a 120 foot radius in the event that the antenna were to fall. The project area is vegetated almost exclusively by ragweed, with a limited number of other old field species. The nursery stock to the south is predominantly evergreen trees and shrubs, including juniper and cedar, and black pine. Bayberry and other deciduous shrubs and trees are also present. The proposed project will occupy only a small area of the site, and the remaining land could either be allowed to undergo succession or be returned to an active farming use. The ecological impacts of the proposed project will be minimal after project construction. The land use in the vicinity of the site is predominantly agricultural, with a mix of residential development and a few small scale commercial properties along the NYS 25 corridor. The rural IIPbY NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL. PLANNING. CONSULTING Page 2 . II Atlantic Special Use Permit EAF Review character of the area should be considered a valuable resource, and the potential for land use conflicts and visual impacts is the primary concern associated with the proposed project. The proposed project will introduce a new land use which is incongruous with the existing rural quality of the area. Although the monopole and building can be partially screened, they would seriously detract from the pastoral character of the hamlet. The proposed project would allow continued agricultural use of most of the parcel, which would not be possible if the parcel were developed under existing zoning. However, the location of a large communication structure in the area will result in an inherent land use conflict, and this impact is expected to be significant. The height of the structure and use of the property should be considered in the context of appropriate land use and zoning in the vicinity. The visual impacts of the proposed project are also likely to be significant, although partial mitigation could be employed. The proposed structure will be apparent from both NYS 25 and from local residences along Platt Road. The subject site is clearly visible from the surrounding area due to the adjacent agricultural uses and lack of vegetation along NYS 25, and the open vistas across the agricultural fields contribute to the rural quality of the area. The existing nursery stock will help screen views from the south, but the 100' pole will be visible. Lighting of the structure may also be employed, which will intrude on the character of the area during the nighttime hours. These impacts can be partially mitigated through the use of landscaping to provide screening. At a minimum, the proposed shed and fenced area should be screened with new plantings. Additional street plantings could also be utilized along NYS 25 to help soften views of the proposed monopole. The proposed setback of300 feet is great enough that a 20 foot tree would block views of the proposed monopole from NYS 25. It is recommended that deciduous trees and shrubs be used along the roadway. Although evergreens would provide more complete screening, they would be inconsistent with the existing streetscape along NYS 25, and the monopole would not dominate views if observed through a hedgerow of deciduous trees and shrubs. Similar plantings could be utilized along the western border of the site to screen views from Platt Road, although the existing homes offer some mitigation. Views across the fields from the south and east will be more distant, but the pole would still be visible if no mitigation is employed. Although the visual intrusion of the proposed pole might be mitigated by new plantings, such landscaping would also eliminate the existing agricultural vistas from NYS 25 and Platt Road. Maintenance of these vistas is important in protecting the rural nature of the hamlet, and thus the visual impacts of the proposed project should be considered significant. No traffic impacts are expected as a result of the proposed project, as on going maintenance will require only two trips per month. There may be a slight impact on local traffic during construction. Impacts on community services such as police, fire and school districts should also be minimal. There will be a negligible tax increase to provide services, and no increase in demand for services is expected. The structure will be fenced to minimize the potential for vandalism or trespassing by young people. .P&Y NELSON. POPE &: VOORHIS, LLC ENVIFlONMENT AL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page J . II Atlantic Special Use Pennit EAF Review In addition to these site specific impacts of the proposed project, the cumulative impacts of the proposed project must be considered. Approval of the proposed project will set a precedent for approval of other tower sites within the Town. Without proper planning, this would result in a significant intrusion on the rural nature of the community. The proposed project should be considered in the context of an overall plan for the siting of communication structures so as to minimize potential impacts on land use and visual resources. If the Town Board agrees to allow these structures within the Town, their locations should be carefully chosen to minimize the number of towers and identifY the optimal sites. The current application should not be considered without investigation of the cumulative impacts of the proposed project. . . . In summary, the primary concerns related to the proposed project are the potential for land use conflicts and visual impacts. In addition, there are potential cumulative impacts on siting of towers in other parts of the Town. The visual impacts can be partially mitigated by screening of the proposed structure with plantings along the northern and western boundaries of the site, but the inherent land use conflict would not be mitigated by these measures and the existing agricultural vista would be lost. Some impacts would be greater under existing single family zoning, including greater disruption of the native soils and vegetation on site, as well and discharge of sanitary flow to groundwater. Single family subdivision would also result in a permanent use which precludes agriculture on the site. Ongoing agricultural use will be possible under the proposed project, and the site could be returned to full agricultural use if the lease were discontinued in the future. Single family development would also result in slightly greater traffic impacts, as well as a greater demand for community services. While some of these impacts might be locally significant if unmitigated, construction offour to five new homes would not be expected to result in significant cumulative impacts and land use conflict issues would not occur, as the land is zoned for residential use. Th~ board may wish to require a Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part 3 Narrative and Analysis which addresses the potential land use conflicts, visual intrusion and cumulative impacts of the proposed project. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. les. oorhis, CEP, AICP Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC enc: Long EAF Parts I & II .P&V NELSON. POPE & VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL . PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 4 . . " 1-1-16-2 (2/87)~7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental auallly Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEaR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determIne, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable, It is also understood that those who determine significance may have Iiule or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly. comprehensive in' nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analy~is that takes place in Parts 2 and 3, Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitillated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions ( Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that:- o A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not . have a sianificant impact on the environment. therefore ~ n..ative declaration will be prepafeet " o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment. there will not be a sillnificant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED nella live declaration will be prepared.' o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. . A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action l~lrn @ ~ 0 WI ~,In11 lU:~ ". ; n ii' !;:; j Ui APR 3 .;:). L's3:;~':~.,;"~':{ ~:;Si"'~'i-...J ,'":'.;' , , .'; "111 'j",;!:;!) -...,- . . Bell Aclantic NYNEX Mobile Communications Monopole Site Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name 0/ Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Ofiicer Signature of ResponSIble Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date . PART 1-PROJECT INFO.T10N Prepared by Project Sponsor .'IOTICE. Thos document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant efl on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be conside as par: or the applu;,Juon for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide i.)nv ddditio Information you belle"e will be needed to complete Parts 2 and J. It is e'pected ~hdt compJ~t1on 01 the lull EAf will be dependent on information currently available and wi/I not invo new studies. research or Investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate dnd spel.: each instance. NAME OF ACTION Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Communications Monopole Site LaCA rlON OF ACTION (Include Sir.., Addrus. Municipality and County) 24850 Main Road, Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLlCANT/sPONSOA Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Communications ADORESS 60 Herricks Road CITY/po Mineola BUSINESS TELEPHONE I 516) 739-4622 NAME OF OWNER 'If dm.r.enl) Mark and Mar Beth ADDRESS 217 4th Street CITY/PO Phillips ZlP COPE 11501 reen ort oeSCRIPTION OF ACTlON Lease of an approximately 1,800 square foot vacant parcel to construct a 100 foot monopole for cellular antennas and an associated 12' x 40' unmanned equipment shelter. Lease area is located on a 10.54t acre former agricultural parcel. Tax Map No. District 1000 - Section 18 - BLock 6 - Lot 5. ZIP CODE 11944 . . ~v< Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. If not applicable A. Site Description Physical selting of overall project. both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 Present land use: DUrban 0 Industrial DCommercial oRes/dential (suburban) oRural (non-farm (!;). oforest oAgriculture 1XI0the.r former. all:ricultural field and nursery - &' otal acreage of project area: 10.54 acres. currently vacant APPROXIMATE ACREAGE *Formerly agricultural PRESENTLY AfTER COMP.lETION Meadow or Brush/and (Non-agricultural) field and acres . acres forested nursery acres acres Agricultural*(Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 10.:>4 acres ,." 16.4~ acres Wetland (freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECl) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 61Zhe'- "1>e,lI/~ acres 0.61 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces (monQPole and acres 0.01 acres Other (Indicate type) equ1pment shelter) acres ~ ~ acres CD What is predomi~ant soil type(s) on project site1 Haven loam. 0 to 2 percent slopes (.HeA) a. Soil drainage: IiC!Well drained 100 % of site OModerately well drained % of site oPoorly drained % of site . ,&( b. If any agricultural land is Invo/~ed. how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the :-IYS ,.. land Classification System1 HI .,4 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). . 0.0 G> Are there bedrock outcroppings on prOlect sitel DYes 119 No A' a. What is depth to bedrock! > 4"" (in feet) ~tI' ~~. 2 . . 5. Approximate percentage 01 proposed project site with slopes: 1l!l0-10% 100 015% or greater site. or district. listed % 010-15% % % 6. Is. project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, Registers of Historic Places? DVes IliINo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks? $t!) What is the depth or the water table? 17:t (in feet) 'f/ I\rTe.tl- )ocT '2,.' \ 'l>en~'t'D 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or safe source aquifer? ggYes DNa on the State or the National DYes Il!lNo W....,.R. " I 10. Do hunting. fishing or shell fishing opportunities presentlv exist in the project area? DVes e9No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes ~No According to ~i te in~Dection Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e.. cliffs. dunes. other geological formations) DYes IiilNo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes IiilNo If yes. exp.lain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes rnNo 1 S. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary N/A 16. lakes. ponds. wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) ( 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? IKIYes ONo aJ If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? IKIYes ONo b) If Yes. will,improvements be necessary to allow connection? IKIYes ONo (on-site improvements) 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets law. Article 2S-AA. Section 303 and 304? DYes IiINo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECl. and 6 NYCRR 6177' DYes IliINo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes IKINo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) /8> Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor tJ "" (])I Project acreage to be developed: ~ O. "&.eres initially: c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 10.49 acres. d. length of project. in miles: N/ A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion. indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off:street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed u.,., g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type 01 housing units: N/ A One Family Two Family Multiple Family to.'!."\ ~~lle.t..~toJe."V~ ".05:t acres. to be leased. ~ l>.C!lf-.cres ultimately. """s.. ....PPLleAl-IT APPEAes ~'T' 11> "'AliI! "4aoU,,,reJ) ,) FoIL ~b"et. J)~ItC N/A %. 2 . *One to two trips . per montn to inspect equipm!Ilt Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in teetl of largest proposed structure 100 ~ height: 12 t width; ~CI>Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is' ~ *Monopole is 100 ft. in hSight - equipment shelter 40' length. ft. '1'%.- is 12 ft. x 40 ft. ;, 'Un "'U_i, 1......L"lIyj Ill...l:';ll.j.. r'H...;.... t:dllll. t:"l(...j ~vtll t.Jt.: ICll'U\I'CJ 'fUll. Slle! J. Will disturbed areas be reclaImed! ':;Ves DNo e9N/A a. It 't'es, for what inteno _ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. W:II t<Jpsoil be stockpiled ior reclamation! DYes DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation! DYes DNo 0.91- "'bl!l!il!! and ]JDG How manv ~"res or _egeCdtlon (trees. shrubs. ground coversl will be removed from site! --e. IlJ acres 5 Will any mature 'orest (o,er 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project! III -lEHt-Sj<.ulHC yards DVes iJlNo 10. 11. 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: N/ A .' a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phasesl 8. Will blasting occur during construction I :lYes rnNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 7; after project is complete Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 3 months. (including demolition). (number). month month DYes year. (including demolition). year. DNo o DYes IiiINo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes rnNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes' IillNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or. decrease by proposal! DYes ElNo explain 1 S. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 y~ar flood plain? DYes G!lNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ClYes 5tJNo a. If yes. what is the amount per month tons b. If yes. will. an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes DNo c. If yes. give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes DNo e. If Yes. explain " 17. Will the project involve the' disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life! DYes ElNo tons/month. years. 18. Will project use herbicides or, pesticldesl :lYes iJNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes rnNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise leve/sl . DYes ClINo 21. Will proiect result in an increase in energy use} If yes, indicate type(s) Electricity 22. If water supply is from wells. indicate pumpong capaCity N/ A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 0 gallons/day. 24 Does project involve Local, State or Federal fundIng! DYes egNo If Yes. explain il!!Yes DNo 4 -------------:-. ,----- . ti) Approvals Requi.ed: ~~ity. .Town, \'i'la~e Bo."d ~s ~No City. Tow", Village Planning Board DYes 6i3No City. Town Zoning BOJrd i1l!Yes ONo City. County Health OepJrtment eYes all No Other local Agencies eVes Iil:No Other Regional Agencies DYes IllINo State Agencies DYes ogNo ~ Federal Agencies .' )(res ogNo . Type Submittal Oale ~ IT'E 'Pc.AlJ. 3p~tl~1 BI~ F~~~lt [V~ Pub ic Ut lity Structure ~c.~. C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision I IiiIYes ONo If Yes. indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment Ozoning variance alIspecial use permit Osubdivision Dsite plan' Dnew/revision of master plan O~esource management plan Oother 2. What is the zoning classifieation(sJof the sitel R-80 , /3) What is the maximum potential development of the site If developed as permitted by the present zonlngl .\(J( ~ single-family homes on overall 10.54 acre property. ~ ~V~ . ' 4. What is the proposed zoning of the sitel N/A ' 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoningl N/A G.. Is the proposed. action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? IDYes ONo 7, . What are the predQrninant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 'A mile radrus of proposed' action I Land uses; res~dential. commercIal (gas station and landscaping company)" agricutlural zonine: R-80. B (General Business) 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are a. What is the minimum lot size proposedl Will proposed action require any authorization(s] for the formation of sewer or water dlstriets? Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, tire protection]1 DYes IDNo a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demandl DYes DNa Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels I a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional trafficl DYes 10. 11, 12. uses within a % N/A proposedl IDYes DNa mile? DYes KINo education. police. DYes IDNo DNa D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal. please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. u~ t9 the best of my knowledge. bile by Freudenthal &. Elkowitz . onsI11t'!:IInf- Date itle President leney. co,"plete the Co..st~1 Assessment Form before pI'oceeding Signature If the ..ction is in the Co~st~l with this ,usessment. 4/2/97 5 . . Part 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonablel The reviewer Is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question, . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. . In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a, Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Ves if there will be sny Impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Ves answers, c, If answering Ves to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to Indicate the potential size of the Impact. if Impact threshold equale or exceeds any example provided, check column 2, If Impact will occur but threshold Is lower than example, check column 1. d. Ideniifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that II Is also necessarily significant. Any large Impact must be evaluated In PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an Impact In column 2 simply asks that It be looked at further. e. if reviewer has doubt about size of the Impact then consider the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. if a potentially large Impact checked In column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) In the project to e omallto moderate Impact, also check the Ves box In column 3. A No response Indicates that such a reduction Is not possible, This must be explained In Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? . DNa 01ES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. . Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. . Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. . Construction in a designated floodway. . Other impacts R'Nr""'L Gtil.llb/~ 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)01'IO DYES . Specific land forms: 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large MItigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo S- O DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo . . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large MItigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes DNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 OVes oNo IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECl) ~O DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Developable area of site contains a protected water body. . Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. . Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. . Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new bodV of water? DNa DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. . Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. . Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater --/ quality or quantityl 0NO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. . Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. . Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. . Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. . Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. . Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. . Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. . Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. . Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. . Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. . Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or paller~ or water runoffl l.!INO Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would change flood water flows. surface DVES 7 . o Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. o Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality! ~O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. o Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. o Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed Sibs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. o Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. o Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endang~d species! I!1NO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Reduction of one or more species listed on the New Vork or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. o Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. o Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. o Of her impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species! DNa 0'YES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. o Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation.. . I Jt,f "J.IK/H.. c..c..EAIZ/~6t I1f= DLb FeLb lIedfrer/tT1l>N IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources! DNa 0YES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard. orchard. etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo - 0 0 oVes urNo . . Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. .10 0.1:> AaZ6:$ . The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.S acres of agricultural land. . The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources! DNa (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section Appendix e.) Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in ~ c~ to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man~made or natural. . Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. . Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. . Other impacts: I t.Kt.lI_tl oM. ~l'.lAI:l"IllZ.A\.. 1I\~TIl'Eo - ft--\l..u:. 1tJO",,"-T\ II"~ "'(..t~",U,'tF. VI~TK . ~ES 617.20, IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of l)istoric, pre- historic or paleontological importance! li!lNo DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. . Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. . Proposed Action will occur In an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NVS Site Inventory. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities! Examples that would apply to column 2 ~O DVES . The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. . A major reduction of an open space important to the community. . Other impacts: 9 . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large MItigated By Impact Impact Project Change I!'r 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 OVes oNo 0 Ii3" [!(v;,s oNo '9"t.1"lfIL. ~1Il~ 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 Ii'J oVes [id1-.Io 0 0 oVes oNo . 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo . IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique character- istic, of a critical environmental area (CEA) established..,pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14(g) I ~O DYES list the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? . Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? . Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? . Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? . Other impacts: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transporl(ltioll systems? ~O [lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16 \o\fill proposed action affect the community's sourcf'yof fuel or energy supply? iXNO [-In S Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial lISC'. . Other impa<:ts' 10 . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo D 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo . NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration.--,,, a result of the Proposed Action? ~O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. . Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). . Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. . Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safetyl Q!<(o DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. . Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) . Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. . Proposed action may result In the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing commu~yl DNa IiIYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The permanent population of the city, town or village In which the project Is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. . The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. . Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. . Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. . Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. . Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) . Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. . Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. . Other impacts: ""P0"TEi",,""L. (..coNf'UC\ U)ITI\ ~u.lZ..."'L-- e,MAllAc.'1!::IL O,,~ . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNO 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 ul DYes li1'No 0 0 DYes DNa 0 [;l-' DYes ~o 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impact~ DNa IIfYE 5 If any action In Part 2 Is IdentifIed as a potential large Impact or If you cannot detormlne the magnllude 0' Impact, proceed to Part 3 11 . ~cz~"Z~ {P/ c:.\\ffDL,t ~~ ,y s:>.~ t'a~_ Vi ~ <:!:.~-'c ,'," -~.... v ::) ;..,..(:, ~ ~ Q . : ~"" ""': "'.,.., ,.,.." "'c::>.... . ~.; 0"" 'Yh ~~ :' ~Q.f + ::-o.y~~' ~9 . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR~ Chairman WlLLlAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L~ EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 22, 1997 Daniel Falasco, P ,E. Savik & Murray 2110 Smithtown Ave. Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 Re: Proposed site plan for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Falasco: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 21, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, ~~,~/t6 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman . . STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 EDWARD J. PETRQU, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN ACTING COMMISSIONER April 17, 1997 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soutllold, New York 11971 Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile 24850 Main Road Orient Dear Mr. Orlowski: We have reviewed the Full Environmental Assessment Form, Part 1 and the Site Plan for t:he proposed telephone tower facility referenced above. We concur that the Southold Planning Board should assume SEQR lead agency status. We have no project in our five year program within this area. If you have any questions, you may contact G. Beierling at 952-6128. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Very truly yours, 1~~ FRANK PEARSON Planning & Program Management 1~1 ~ m -frr\Vi~ f~ I U<r-"'~-'" i III AI'Ir> 2 , d U' ""' 1997 I L. Su.tF P8 ,,~ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS . . '2>&>]. \'12>, 5>..;1; Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Serge Doyen James Dinizio, Jr. JlobsFt }.. '{ill~ Lydia A. Tortora Maureen c. Ostermann Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Department Attn: Valerie Scopaz FROM: Chairman and Members of the ZBA DATE: April 15, 1997 SUBJECT: Planning/Use Report 1000-18-6-5 at Orient At the April 10, 1997 Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals, a resolution was uanimously adopted requesting that the Southold Town Planning Department prepare a brief report identifying existing and proposed land use issues relevant to the district and adjacent districts thereto, of the proposed NYNEX Cellular Telephone Tower site at 24850 Main Road, Orient. The Board of Appeals would appreciate it if you could have the brief report prepared by April 24th, and if not then, than no later than May 1st. cc: Howard Pachman, Esq. Laury Dowd, Esq. -1 \ID' rn @ m B W ~~fn1j nI' - . Liu APR 16 \99( . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK . S"b~. ?e:. v.s ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS April II, 1997 STEPHEN G. HAYDUK, P.E. COMMISSIONER Town of Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - O<,",,*" Dear Ms. Scopaz: We have reviewed the above-referenced SEQRA. Specifically note that: This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for this proposed development. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-4099. Very truly yours, Richard J. LaValle, P.E. Chief Engineer By: /;/ . ~/ RJLlMPC/jfb 15;;}! SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 335 YAPHANK AVENUE . YAPHANK, N.Y. 11980 . (516) 852-4000 FAX (5161852.4150 ~ . . . :'0\i. .\~ \,1> '.t. ~1 m:) PAGHMAN. PAGHMAN & BROWN. P. G. ATTORNEYS 366 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY COMMACK. NEWYORK 11725 (5161543-2200 TELEGOPIER (516) 543-2271 HOWARD E. PACHM~ MATTHEW E. PAGHMAN KAREN R. BROWN- COUNSEL HARVEY B. BESUNDER PATRICK A. SWEENEY .M.50~MrTTI<P ,1'1 N,;w "';;JOSEY April 10, 1997 Members of the Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road southold, New York 11971 RE: Board of Zoning Appeals Applications #4446SE & 4446V Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile (Orient-Phillips site) 1 I ! APR I I d;;; , L-S'llli1Y:;'I{j'-YiWi!~~-'~>'''''1 PlAt{:<;:0EG (::O;;JiD --......,.,,-...,.~---"'........~...- ~~-"""" I'"" :,1)J J!11 j P 1 j;) j ~~.-,,, Dear Members of the Board: I have been advised by the Board of zoning Appeals ("BZA") that your Board has requested that it assume lead agency status, pursuant to the New York state Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA") for the above-referenced matter (a copy of your request, dated April 9, 1997, is enclosed1). I believe this is based on the Southold Town Planning Department's erroneous determination that the action is a Type "1" action, because the proposed monopole is allegedly 100' above the original ground level. Obviously, such an analysis is based upon erroneous and outdated information. The application, as originally filed, requested permission to erect a public utility structure which contained, in part, a 100' monopole. However, at the outset of the public hearing with respect to this application, on January 16, 1997, my partner, Howard Pachman, specifically advised the BZA that Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile ("BANM") was amending the application to request a reduced height of only 84'. Based upon this request, the application before the BZA proceeded. In any event, I wish to bring to your attention that, in the past, your Board has determined that almost identical applications would 1 I note that a copy was not addressed to the applicant. . . Page 2 Members of the planning Board April 10, 1997 have no impact significant environmental impact and, thus, have issued a "negative declaration." See letter from Bennett Orlowski Jr. to Marie ongioni, Esq. (dated February 25, 1992 [a 104' monopole], which is enclosed for your review). If you check your files, you also issued a negative declaration on the Elijah's Lane, Mattituck application for Cellular Telephone Co., d/b/a MetroOne in 1992 (a 100' monopole). Furthermore, even if the monopole had remained at the original 100' height, this would not require a finding that the application is a Type "I" action. section 617.4 (b)(7) of the New York State Code of Rules and Regulations ("NYCRR") states, in pertinent part, that a any action involving: any structure exceeding 100 feet above original ground level in a locality without anv zoninq requlation oertaininq to heiqht (emphasis supplied); is a Type "I" action. Insofar as the BZA claims that the Southold Town zoning regulation in the IR-80" Zoning District, to wit: Code [100-230(0)] is a height limitation section, although I may have a different view, this provision of the NYCRR is inapplicable. In conclusion, we respectfully request that you withdraw your request for lead agency status and recommend, as in the past, that a negative declaration be declared. Very truly yours, MAtft: P~ MEP/blb enclosures cc: Board of zoning Appeals ...orient-p.nynfbdmember.ltr 516 765 1823 ~ . - ' RPR 09 '97 01 :~UTHOd) TOtN' HRLL 516 765 1823 ~ Co.lOoot. ./ BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. e::I ChaIrman ~ WILLIAM J. CREMER6 ;:::l~ KENNETH I.. EDWARDS ~Q GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAN. JR. 'J RICHAJU) G. WARD P.l Fox. -...F.- r PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .' ::\-~~-=:---,~_. ~ , :,,"",) 1 Ls~, (;:,;\ {.' .. "~-""-'" . j r)',"~-"':..,_..._.. .,' . .' I 'fir! ..:418(11' }1\J \./ ,-ll.L Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request -.~..- '-...---.....--............,..- ".- Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under ArtIcle e (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part e 17 the fOllowing: 1, Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern Which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response, Project Name: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Requested Action: This site plan i8 for a cellular telephone tower facility to be located on a 4,530 square foot section of 8 10.5 acre lot loceted on the south side of SR25, 375 feet east of Platt Rd., in Orient. SEQRA Classification: (X) Type I ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: Val.rie Scooaz. Town Planner (516) 765-1938 \P~ 09 '97 01:18PM~UTHOLD TOWN HRLL 515 755 1823 ~ P.2 P"98 ~ ./,/ Lead Agency Coordination Requ..t ~ The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement eElS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( X) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett OrlOWSki, Jr. Chairman ee: Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany New YOrk State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Public WOrks New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 1)/.( .~ft(?J Jt . vv , '\.~ 1./ \~ . ... 6/ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Ch.1innan George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards ~.c,~ ."~'\HOl; .~. , ".:lU '1 /> - .^, ..) _ ~A '" .1'.""". v/_' ." ~.::..,) . ," c;.r~ .:.. ~/ ~ .:~ ( . ..~ -: c~ .= " -;.:.:.1 :-' ~; .~ o:n ::}.; '.'_ .:2: .~f \~~. .__~~} .:f- ;;) - ';/''''/ '''''' ,...~".., ~-o' '/},.'~ -";:''''.j''' ....- "' ..... '."/ '--;~'~~~ SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Ro, P.O. Box /179 Soulhold. New York 1197' T<lephone 15/61765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 25, Fax (516) 765-1823 Irw~@[gO~5~ - 1992 ' I - :' ! 1\\ I FEB 2 5 ~ ! I ~ \ . "~ '''':'i Marie Ongioni, Attorney at Law 21B Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 Re: Amendment to Site plan of Arthur V. Junge, Inc. for NYNEX Mobile Communications N/s CR 4B Cutchogue, New York SCTM 1000-96-1-19 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, Februay 24, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED That the Southo1d Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, as the lead agency makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration for the amended site plan of Arthur V. Junge Inc. for NYNEX Mobile Communications, last revised on July 31, 1991, signed by Richard E. Tangel, Licensed Engineer, and received in this office on September 13, 1991. A copy of the Negative Declaration is enclosed for your records. Please submit a copy of the site plan with Health Department approval (or waiver) so that we may proceed with your site plan. Sincerely, {i/1-VH-Utr dZd~, cJ". /4- Bennet~ Orlowski, Jr. /7' Chairman . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowsk.i. Jr.. Chairman George RitchIe Latham. Jr RIchard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards ,1]]...:.-..::....-:':':)..:"... ..: .' "UrrDl,;- -0,. /:;) '" t?~ c~ , .~,~. .:;..', -- '~. 101 ~":. '~ .:::t ," . -. ~ .:;:, ..... :"'- . ; ,,:J ".~ SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Roa' P.O. Box 1179 Soulhold, New York 11971 T oJephone (5In) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765.1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance February 24, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Amended Site Plan of Arthur V. Junge Inc. (Industrial Building) for NYNEX Mobile Communications Co. SCTMi: 1000-96-1-19 Location: North side of CR 48, approximately 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue, New York SEQR Status: Type I l Unlisted (x ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (xl . . Page 2. Negative Declaration Southold Planning Board Description of Action: To construct a monopole one hundred (100') in height, for the purpose of installing a cellular communications transmitter; and to construct an unmanned, pre-fabricated accessory service building whose dimensions will be 12' by 26'. This communications facility will inhabit the same premises as an existing industrial building that is 110' by 40' in size. Reasons Supporting This Determination: No corres~ondence has been received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's Stony Brook office. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. No correspondence has been received from the Department of Health Services. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. No correspondence has been received from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. It should be noted that the Zoning Board has issued variances for reduction in the rear and side yard setbacks and for an increase in the maximum allowed height for the tower, and has issued a Special Exception for the public utility use. The Planning Board finds that the potential environmental impacts of the proposed construction are not significant. (The potential impacts of the proposed project also were reviewed by our environmental consultant in a report dated February 3, 1992. This report has been considered by this Board in making this determination of a Negative Declaration.) The Board's findings are supported by the following information. 1. The site lies within a large Light Industrial zone, and is adjacent to the Town's landfill. The proposed use is approriate to this zoning district. 2. While there are two non-conforming residential dwellings to the west of the site. the view of the new building and tower will be partially screened by additional landscaping that will be planted to the west of the monopole. 3. Since the site will be unmanned, there will be no noticeable increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site as a whole. . . Page 3. Negative Declaration Southold Town Planning Board 4. The anticipated radio emissions from the antennae appear to be within the Radiation Hazard Standards of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) . For Further Information: Contact Person: Valerie Scopaz Address: Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179, Southold, N.Y. 11952 Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Commissioner Jorling, NYSDEC, Albany .Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town BUilding Department Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals ~ Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Applicant: NYNEX Mobile Communications c/o Ongioni Property OWner: Arthur Junge . . s.., bj . ?r) If'; April 8, 1997 George E. Pataki Governor Alexander F. Treadwell Secretary of State Ms. Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Platt Road, Orient Dear Ms. Scopaz: Thank you for submitting the Lead Agency Coordination Request to the Department of State (DOS). We are not interested in assuming Lead Agency status; we do not object to the Town of Southold Planning Board as Lead Agency. If it is determined that a federal permit or federal funding is required for any portion of the proposed project, please instruct the applicant to submit a Federal Consistency Assessment Form (FCAF) and supporting information to the U.S. ACOE/NY and to the DOS. Upon receipt, we will determine if the information is adequate to commence a formal review of the project for consistency with New York State's Coastal Management Program. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call me at (518) 474-6000. ~ --......... Walter F. Meyer Coastal Resources Specialist I ":~;;:w" i~'".? ""ij"';;'" F\ ~ i_t.,- ::: 'I; t5 ' I ~o .r,.L.C...::.....,---.. .'....I..ln.i.. 'I' II: U L~~.~l.~.... jg~~:~) SLiULXJUj ;(\"IN _ft~!Llr:~L~__.__,.~"j WFM/wfm c. U.S. ACOE/NY - Sophie Ettinger file NYS DEPARTMENT OF STATE Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization Albany, NY 12231-0001 Voice: (518) 474-6000 Fax: (518) 473-2464 . . ~ SAVIK & MURRAY 2110 Smithtown Avenue Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 (516) 467-7775 FAX (516) 467-7640 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 4 ATTENllOH JOBNo 010-4 RE: TO ~~'6~t\;I~1 J~~~ 5DII+hr,Ir1, N,-/ I lie" I WE ARE SENDING YOU _~h.d _ Under s.para. cover via ~~ns the following ttems: _ Shop drawings _ Copy of letter Prints _ Samples _ Spaclflcations _ Change order COPIES DATE No DeSCRIPTION ~ ~c lSTl'l ('\ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: _zapproval "'=F?" your use ..k'As requested For review and comment _ Approved as submitted _ Approved as noted Returned for corrections _ Resubml~copl.s for approval _ Submit_copies tor distribution _ Retum_correa.d prints FOR BIDS DUE 19_ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS ,:;, Am 3 ~ lfwl ,"". I ' L~, <~v.' "";". -~.- - COPY TO I i \, ,'-; . i?' ,~.,/7 q:.1 (7,-,~ / SIGNED {(! WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. JR. RICHARD G. WARD ,~ . ,~,,~~ t'~ ~ t" ~, ~~ ~# ~()./ + .;:~~< ~ Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 4, 1997 Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope and Voorhis 572 Wait Whitman Rd. Melville, NY 11747 Re: Review of EAF for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Voorhis: The South old Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned site plan to your office for review. Also enclosed is the site plan dated August 20,1996 The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on March 31, 1997. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the April 21, 1997 public meeting. Please review the enclosed and submit an estimate of your fee. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, ~ ~9v~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. . . WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD ss.~';,\lfFOL.t "ci\ &" ~ 'f;. '\ . ~~ ~& ~~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1197I Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Requested Action: This site plan is for a cellular telephone tower facility to be located on a 4,530 square foot section of a 10.5 acre lot located on the south side of SR25, 375 feet east of Platt Rd., in Orient. SEQRA Classification: (X) Type I ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: Valerie Scopaz. Town Planner (516) 765-1938 . . Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( X) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 . . " 14-16-2 (2/87)~7c 617.21 AppendIx A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner. whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable, It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a r:nethod whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly. comprehensive in nature. yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action, Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site, By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3, Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact, The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced, Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. ( DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: D Part 1 D Part 2 DPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magi tude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that:. D A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative dedaration will be prepared.' . D B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment. there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative dedar"tlon will be prep"red.' Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Communications Monopole Site D C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore" positive "edar"tion will be prep"red. . _*...", . . A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions, ii0 \1 " l'Ull APR 3 L. l Name. of Action ...... Name of Lead Agency Print or Tvpe Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(1f different from responsible officer) Date . PART 1-PROJECT INFORM"'N Prepared by Project Sponsor NO Tit: E. Th" document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as par: of the app!r<:,Hlon for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you belle\le will be needed to complete Part; 2 and 3. It is expected that compl~tlon oi the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies. research or Investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Communications Monopole Site LOCATION OF ACTION (Inc!ude Street Addr.." Municipality and County) 24850 Main Road, Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANT!SPONSOFl Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Communications AODRESS BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516, 739-4622 60 Herricks Road i CITY/PO I s~r;.r I ZIP COpE Mineola 1150 NAME OF OWNER (If diU.rent) I BUSINESS TELEPHONE Mark and Mary Beth Phillips (516) 477-2940 ADDRESS 217 4th Street I CITY/PO . I S~E I ZIP CODE Greennort 11944 i DESCRIPTION OF ACTION I Lease of an approximately 1,800 square foot vacant parcel to construct a 100 foot I monopole for cellular antennas and an associated 12' x 40' unmanned equipment shelter. I I Lease area is located on a 10.54t acre former agricultural parcel. Tax Map No. I District 1000 - Section 18 - BLock 6 - Lot 5. I I ! Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. If not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 Present land use: DUrban Dlndustrlal DCommercial OResidential (suburban) ORural (non-farm) o Forest OAgriculture !XIOthe.r former agricultural field and nursery - 2. Total acreage of project area: 10.54 acres. curren.tly vacant APPROXIMATE ACREAGE *Formerly agricultural PRESENTL Y Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) field and acres Forested nursery acres * lU.~4 Agricultural (Includes orchards. cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland {Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECl} Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces (monopole and Oth (I d. t t ) equipment shelter) er n Ica e ype acres J. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes a. 5011 drainage: 62Well drained 100 % of s.ite OModerately well drained OPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involve<j. how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS land Classification System? 10. ,,4 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). \ 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on prolect sitel DYes e9No a. What is depth to bedrock I ,. 400 (in feet) AFTER COMP,lETION - acres 10.49 acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres 0.0<; ~HaA) acres % of site 2 . . 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 1EQ.10% 100 015% or greater site. or district. listed % D1Q.15% % % 6. Is. project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building. Registers of Historic Places? DYes IiiINo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? 17'!: (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal. or sole source aquifer? on the State or the National DYes IENo !l!lYes DNo 10. 11. Do hunting. fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes egNo Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes I!'! No According to ~ite insnection Identify each species Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project sitel (Le.. cliffs, dunes. other geological formations) DYes ~No Describe 12. 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation areal . DYes IilNo If yes. exp.lain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes IENo . 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is trlbuta,y N/A 16. lakes. ponds. wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) ( 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities! IKIYes DNo a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection! IKIYes DNo b) If Yes. will.improvements be necessary to allow connection! IKIYes DNo (on-site improvements) 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets law. Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? DYes IilNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECl. and 6 NYCRR 617!' DYes IlSINo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes! DYes I&INo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.05 acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 10.49 acres. d. length of project, in miles: N/ A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion. indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off~street parking spaces existing 0 : proposed u1'l" g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/ A One Family Two Family Multiple Family '.OS'!: acres. to be leased. acres ultimately. 0.05 N/A 2 %; *One to two trips . per montn to inspect equiprent Condominium Initially Ultimately 100~ 12' i. Dimensions (in reet) of largest proposed structure height; width; i linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/ A *Monopole is 100 ft. in h~ight - equipment shelter 40' length. ft. is 12 ft. x 40 ft. L t,v", ;,,:...._. 'r>-l(...;'Ll1 ll'Ll,'_".J1 ,I ,~' I'IL"-, t;'dILlI. l::tl.J ~vili :.Jt; 1t,;(fI(JVt:U /fUlIt lIu;, Slte( ~ 'J '~O'.5iLubrc yards 3. Will disturbed areas be recla,me. ,:lYes ONo Il9N/A . a. It yes, for what intenci . .ose is the site being reclaimed? . b. W:II t<:lpsoil be stockpiled ror reclamation? DYes DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation' DYes DNo *@e1!!ill and 4. How manv .lues of \tegetation (trees. shrubs. ground covers) will be removed from site? 0.05* acres, 5. Will any mature forest (0'.0' 100 yea,s old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes ~No 10. 11. 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: N/ A a. Total number 01 phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? :JYes mlNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 2: after project is complete Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 3 months, (including demolition). (number). month month DYes year, (including demolition). year. DNo o DYes IiilNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes Il!INo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes GaNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? DYes !!DNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes mlNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? DVes IKINo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will. an existing solid waste facility be used? DVes DNo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DVes DNo e. If Ves, explain 17 Will the project involve the. disposal of solid waste? a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. II yes. what is the anticipated site life' DVes ItlNo tons/month. years. 18. Will project use herbicides or. pesticides? :JVes KlNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)1 DVesll!lNo 20 Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? . DYes ClINo 21 Will project result in an increase in energy use' If yes. indicate type(s) Electricity ;EVes DNo 23. 22. If water supply is from wells. indicate pumping capaCity o N/A gallons/minute. Total anticipated water usage per ddY gallons/day. DVes ~No 24 Does project involve local, State or Federdl funding? If Yes. explain 4 ~.~_..._----"-- -.----... -- --.:.~ 1--' C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? IifIYes DNo If Yes, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment Dzoning variance IilIspecial use permit Dsubdivision Osite plan' Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother 2. What is the zoning c1assification(slof the site? R-80 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Five single-family homes on overall 10.54 acre property. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/ A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 2S, Approvals Requi.ed: City. Town. \'i'lage Bo."d City. Towr.. Village Planning Board City. Town Zoning Board City. County Health De~lartment Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies . . Type Submittal Dale DYes IXINo DYes 62No fl.!IYes DNo DYes IilINo DVes IiliNo DYes iilINo DYes !ENo DYes !ENo 3i"bl1c1 H.,,.. F~J-U.llt r...a Pu ic Utility Structure 6.. Is the proposed. action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? IOYes 7. . What are the predQroinanlland use(s) and Ulning classifications wjthin a 'A mile radius of propo. sed action? Land uses; res1dent aL, commerciaL tgas stat10n and landscaping company), agricutlural zoning: R-80. B (General Business) . 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 'A mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? DYes IONo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additionaltrafficl DYes DNo IOYes DNo DYes IrlNo DYes DNo [)No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certif. that the inior\r:iifn,&rf.rA1~c a~~N Applicant Sp Signature If the action is in the Coastal with this assessment. Uj! t9 the best of my knowledae. bile by Freudenthal &. Elkowitz .. CJtlSIl1t'anr Date itle President leney, cOfl1plete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding 4/2/97 5 GEORGE RITCIDE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. vnLL~J.CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBa RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 1, 1997 Daniel Falasco, P.E. Savik & Murray 2110 Smithtown Ave. Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 Re: Proposed site plan for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Falasco: .. The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 31, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this Type 1 action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, ~~~;Wv5- Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman 4 eTh"Buflill~'IT_"'I~an.8f\1;-t'.L ....., ~t-(-;:< , Or;ent~jA;buzz~:O"ep;l Ta~weiJ Bell Atlantic proposal generates three hbli,p:T.oL(jrf!!alldebate By Tim Kelly same reasons it's'looking to Ori.; The debate had B familiar ring to it. cnt it eventually will seck permis.- In the front of the Southold Town Hall sion to build another new.tower meeting foom stood a knot of prole,s- in Mattituck. It currently main- sionals representing an ,out-ot-town lains a monopole just off Elijahs company. They pointed to aerial pho- lane in Mattituck and maintains a lographs and computer-generated images bank of antennae on the lown in arguing that theirs is an essential pub- police department lower in lie service licensed by the federal gov- Pemole. crnmen!. The town, they said, cannot Bell Atlantic argued that feder- stand in the path of their. expansion altelecommunications law pro- plans. hibits local governments from Then there were the neighbors, angry' placing restrictions on cell phone people with quizzical looks on tbeir facilities, a posilion opponents faces, wondering aloud why they had to challenge, and that the tower is, . suffer what they see as an assault on essential and would be non..Qblru- their community, their very lifestyles, all sive: Theirconsultlng engineers in the name of business. suggested that the use.of the Pllim For .once, this was not a hearing .on Island water tcwer, which 'Was Cross Saund Ferry. This was about Bell recammended by the Planning Atlantic NYNEX Mobile's bid to build a Board, is nat acceptable for sev- ,.cellular phone tower in a vacant farm eral reasons. field ta the south of Route 25 here. The A Safe but Sorry Sight? Zoning Board of Appeals, which hap- The blue-gray pole w.ould with~ pens to h~ve. both phan~ company and stand hurrIcane-force winds the ferry apphcallons to consl~er, Ust~~ t.o comP4JIy. Said, and the radio ~av., .. the tower argument until n~ly-,mldftlght~tsslan5 generated by the eight last :nursday befor.e agreemg ta put tb~:.;-~ antenna on a triangular platform heating an hold u~til ~arch. , ~-rt;,},,:>)t, - placecf on' top wauld be fubclow The company indicated that for the current federal standlids>But for -' SUllolkTmnpho!obyTlmKeIIy all the detailed discUssion - of the RIGHT H.R.-Englriee~ Dan Falasco of Savik & Murray, the firm that submitted the Orient tower appli.catlOJ:!. s~owlng the location of the proposed tower in relation amount of microwitts .of radio to others in the network.'~ frequency emissions and the trou- . ble of cell call "roaming" from carrier to suggested it, re~1 'estBt~- appraiser John; Lydia Tortora.lluggested that the com. ." - c8rrier, the opponents chose noo-tecnni- Breslin 'Jr: of_Huntin8t.on.iold Ute. bOard i pany, which is leasing part of a lO.S-acre, ",-cal'language In broadcasting their con- that such tQwersdo.n,o~ reduce nearby' .. parcel, does not control the square cerns. property vahies;'~Ifyou're riot looking' footage needed far what ,is a permitted , "We don't want th., tower and we forthem,youdon'tseemthem.~'hesaid..,. ~..~II,~tllPltlc_,must,citherr;eDt.;II\O{C~.",j ~would like to know how vie cin stop it.'~" ,: Facing !he board ,men.abers ~~t!t ~e"9rl~ : land,~he, sai~, ,or, f!le for an additional Ellen Peluso, whose family owns a Main ent reSidents at. his-back, he.sald~ ~"I . variance. q\lRoad hoine, said during the over-three- knaw the people who *re'behind 'me The town code requires that a tower how debatc. think I'm out of my mind when I teU you cannot be placed on a property of less The tower, which Bell Atlantic has these poles woo't have an lmpact." than 80,000 square feet, Ms. Tortora shortened from the 100 feet first pro- An altcrnative project to placc the said. Although that is only about a fifth posed to 84 feet but' said could be raised tower on the grounds of the Orient Flrt of the 10.5 acres, Bell Atlantic's lease in the future, would bring clear, consis- Department fell through under the covers only 4,200 square feet. Company tent coverage to East Marion and the weight of oppositialJ from the Orient attorney Howard Pachman of Cammack Orient peninsula, where cell phone coy. Association. That location, which Bcll siid he will me a response. erage is often spotty, thc company'a wit- Atlantic said was acceptable, Is too close The company, which currently rents nesses told the board members. That to the Oyslerpoods School, the as- antenna space on Greenport's water held na meaning for the residelJts, who sociation said. The fire department said tower, said the Plum Island water tower said that not ooly must they endure ever- it would be guided by the graup's rec- is too far removed and poses access increasing ferry traffic, but now they ommendation. problems. Because that area is so re. may have to look upon a large - and in Sufficient Space mote, company engineer John Gaiso tbeir eyes ugly-metal "monopole" juSt Far all theneighbars' cnmity~ the said, the network would need to signifi- so motorists heading to and from the phone company's ilfst obstacle appcan cantly boost power and that would add boats can. carry on uninterrupted cellular to be technical. In this case it's not an static to the calls. "You need to place the conversations. engineering matter but an Interpretation service where the customers arc and Although residents laughed when he of the town zoning code. Board member See Tower, page 30 LIKE THIS-The telephone tower sought for Orient would be a dupli- cate of this one already standing just north 04 Route 25 in Maltituck. Tower... From page 4 wherc the problem is," he said. Bell Atlantic needs a network of local towers to help beat back competition from Ccnnecticut carriers, which can draw away the company's eastern North Fork customers with 300-foot towers and powerful signals. Mr. Oaiso added. The "microcell" technology which re- Iie~ on many small antennas rather than a few larger facilities docs not work in rural areas. he said~' The company sometimes loses cell calls to other carriers when .the signal "roams" in pmhlem areas such a... Ori- ent and East Marion, the engineers told the board. The Connecticut companies have the ability to pick up calls as far removed as the South Fork. theysa,id. That, said Orient Association presi- dent Susan Madigan; Is not a local con- cern. "We do get coverage:' she said. "If the tower is in Connecticut, 1 don't cure. Mr, Pachman said Bell Atlantic has considered 12 differenlloe8tions for the Orient lower, and even approached Cross Sound Ferry about the use of part of it!! teoninal center. Saying it already ''"'1''",;" had some "difficulty:' with the town, the ferry declined."", Despite the claim that the facility would not lit in with Orient's historic nature. Mr. Pachman said the tawer site is not close to the Village Lane historic district. . The company remains willing to work with the community, the attorney said. "We are not coming in here in a high handed way," he said. "We contln. ue to hold our hand in cooperation." The opponents suggested that should the town say yes to this application it con never say no to another. "This is a blatant commercial use'" said David Moore. "If you grant it you will have lost controL" The board agreed to continue the hearing on March 6, but with Mr. Pach- man saying he is unavailable that night another date is expected to be chosen. Thursday's hearing was stopped for 15 to 20 minules when a woman fell ill in the Town Hall foyer, A. ccrtified emergency medical technician. board chaionan Gerry Gaehringer called for 8 recess and raced to his car for Il portable oxygen supply. He instead used the oxy- gen carried by a lawn police patrol car. The woman was laken to Eastern Long Island Hospital for observalion. -, I' ! I fl~~t!irf.'~ ;\O\..I,,:\<: ~.\l,,'.'~ ~ ~""~"Qrio"'''' -~ ~ ;"~ . ~':: "~I:lb,' 'P;;: "~r: 1;JI':~.~r.:I;:':~I?~.qi;:Z'~.i;"~l~ " I~t'~. .~'!> ,.1~,,~~,11 , ., I~ ! r ~ t"~ " I ~ fH H: H'i ---~-t..~ ~ I~ ~ 1-: ;1' , ~ < ?~ o i!~ nrnl ::- ! : 'l'lj ~ I : : , ! li!1 r:; PI ~nH!f ,,' "ja.. l;;;~ ~ n f 'l' g ~@)~ i ~ o~ " '\ ["" r" H~d I' "l[ , , , { , , , it; Gl I ~ ,llllli III !iiti ~.!1 :;:.-;: [3 ~~d~ ~ _ ,ltd- .;( AI.." I "I'! ~i~h I, ;j;~p~ ~fr,~I';! Hu~l Ili[;; 111!jj ~ 9-.@ "'" <' .g 0 ;',,1 ~ ~ ;g-<..... . -"- ~ ..... -< :;,~ Q ~Hfc ~ -<.... ~~I ;; ~fa ,,~I ;. >'- :" ~ ;:00: ~~! g < r i~ !~ Ii "1'- :~ i~ 1.\1 f [.Ii :~ 1~ , "I Ie o ~ l.ol~! , H~ ,~, 0,1'/ ' I~I a; 11,' ~I_O /~' "\- .\ ; ~ 'Yo' Ht " I ~4';ltOlt 111\1 If "-.., ., "f4ll0;;;'''' ~, s" '.'.~ --v......- ----r-- . . VALERIE SCOPAZ TOWN PLANNER en V ~ ~ ~. ~ ~'!T'P Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 OFFICE OF THE TOWN PLANNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Bennett Orlowski, Jr., ChairmaOOI-\ Request for Coordination TO: FROM: DATE: January 17, 1997 Bell-Atlantic/NYNEX 24850 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 The Board has recently received a letter from Congressman Michael Forbs to Supervisor Cochran regarding spectrum-based telecommunications services. The letter indicates that the Telecommunications Act of 1996, mandates that the federal government make available property, rights-of way, and easements under its control for the placement of new spectrum- based telecommunications services. In keeping with the spirit of this act, consideration should be given to Plum Island for the installation of this facility. ~- t . MEMORANDUM TO FILE Mr. Richard Weyhreter, Manager - Real Estate / Zoning for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc. visited the Planning Board office to discuss the tower location in Orient. Mr. Weyhreter indicated they were getting complaints about the location of the tower at 24850 Main Road site in Orient. Mr Weyhreter requested that the application be held until a new location could be found. He indicated that a possibility may be the Plum Island boat terminal in Orient, or other sites that would be satisfactory for transmission. f(;!-/J{~ ' )~ p~ VJ~ ~ (de1kv..J1- ~~ ~(3'1 1117 ~fk -. fl;r,~ . . tJY I ~1l4. ~~ . .e:.~~.~::e. ~~~~~ ~.~ ~d (w-Ld- ~~ ~. ~C/ ~ / fkr.,~,w~) ~ (J~ NjIVyX ~ ~ c~ '-:-1M-! ~ 7: ~ ;;t ~ ~ . ':J7~::'~;: :!:~~~~~ ~'r.~r~' ~~! In)! rn @ rn 0 WI rn !m, lnJ j JAN I 4 ~g7 I t,l) I ,.,____~~""ff?~~Tr~~:f:~'{P):?~-;::~_,.__.,~. ; 7.A ,t! K . ~7~d t.JI /)/1 ~Q.l-:J (~YVVPf.\-L.. ~f'-(-\ AJpfi i.s) P.O. Be,!- 7'+ t2 IOS-S-- (20~ d.-.S- 01"1-<<-+ tvY 1/9.'7 ~ ~/9<V:S~ /'/0-" '-ft ~ ~IIVY 1/97/ J~ /3) ~ i \ ~ /1" &r/&<..VsL- ) -1-" 1/; -e...J ,., ~ So ~i ---- ~~ 1n>1'a-d ____ ~ ~_. - '"7-- 1 ~ ...el'-' . . ~ ~ _-;-L:~ ~ "'-'.-~- "~.;e (> .~ __, . e ~" --R, cd.~ r- . ~ ~ (~ _:"',4. r./- ~ -e '_ ~";...> '~"-7A: f.h',h..../'7) ~ t? ""?' ~~N~X ~ ~-k 1{.,7;; __ ...........D' ~ ~/r vV"~ "7~ -h> ~ ~ ..: _ I' '^"'" jv-r-is,,/tc:k'~ .A ~'I" r ~ ~ ~ r;--I.,4~ - l-es.s H.r~ ....:>' tiP ~. (; : ~ Sil-<..--. 7#-. ."~ r --Ib~ J~ g~ S.:,,~ I ~~ CY,.JTHi,g 'BeE,f!, f. o. ,eO)( 7<1- .:l./o:>S /719/v RlJ. C)te.;E;A.Jr, ~'r 119.: r.'~'" 1 r'D ~ (iil 1 ,';-, --',.-.',-'~'" I D' t" I' co , r .'!J b i! t? U'n'" --,.' "; d ! LJ1 JAN 14 L_ SO~T:;J,r!F;.T;:.;';~,-'~-----'~~" PLA'l!.:!h" ;.,<;;] ~~"""_'''.V''_'' no "_'" . ~~~~ ~;,~ ~:1~ M.u )tk - th..~<~ I ~~r~~~~ ~~.~ ~~r~.l kLf- I.-"'-'~ L~<- .~~L#-e-~ h(J~ ~1'M-d (~~'~ ~~ a:L~ 1c'~~1) -;-Let.. ~~. N'/IVlTY- ~ JL-f~l~ ~.I- ~) ~. ~. ~. .%. to }Ul-e4~ ~'-'-' ~ r~~;6 ~ ~(}~~ ~ r-.J-, ti.. ~~' ~L- ~J.-&~.. Vi ~ _~~-<-rO-<-'~' ~4 () t~ ~L-t 1. ~ tl;7~ f~u- ~ IN! 1/15'7 h 1'3; ICf17 rnrn@rnowrn I ! no: ! JAN I 4 " . i l.__. . . sul&P p8 Bennett Orlowski Chairman of the Planning Board Southold Town Hall 1/13/96 Dear Mr. Orlowski, I am writing to ask for your help with avoiding the proposed NYNEX tower in Orient, and urge you to do everything in your jurisdiction to find a more appropriate site than a small residential/farming community! Poor little Orient seems to be at the mercy of greedy people! Orient is so small, and a gem of the North Fork - but being a historic district seems to mean little. A hundred foot tower would have a very negative impact, visually and as a potential health problem. If NYNEX must have a tower (which there seems to be real question about) Dlease help us get it onto Plum Island where there is no one to care about its ugliness and menace, or onto the Orient Ferry area, where it would have a much lesser impact! Many thanks for your help! ~~__ ~~. k..--: Anne MacKay, Boxx 97 orient, NY 11957 ",',:';"'=""----@~~~-'\:~~.-- \\ \'i! \ :i: ""..\'~ \Ji ." t', ' 'C_._u: D _...,- \\~r-- \UU\ JAN 15\'" r=L:( L.~,-<-, MICHAEL p, FORBES . . 1ST DISTRICT. New Yo"'''; COMMIT"TEE: ;..PPROPRIA TlONS <!Congress of tf)e l1niteb ~tates ~ous'e of 3aepres'entatibes' maS1}ington. iBi! 20515-3201 SU8COMMITTEES: COMMERCE. JUSTICE. STATE. ...."'0 JUDICIARY FOREIGN OPERAT10NS, EXPORT FINANCING. AND AEI.AT'ED PROGR.A.MS TREASURY, POST"'L SeRVICE. AND GENER....L GOVERNMENT INTERNET ADDRESS: mpforbllS@hr.house.gov WORLDWIDe WEB PAGE; http://www.hou'll.gov/forbes/wefcome.trtml January 3, 1997 Ms. Jean W. Cochran Town Supervisor Town of South old Southold Town Hall 53095 M' oad Southold, ng Island, New York 11971 ,~ . I ~ CG./ It. Y1.-0 VZ- (.!..- LOCAL OFFICES: (\ 1500 WIUIAM FLOYD PARKWAY SHIRLEY. LONG ISL.ANO, NY 11967 !5161345-9000 186 WeST MONTAUK HIGHWAY HAMPTON ATl'lIUM. SUITE 0 HAMPTON BAYS, LONG ISLAND, NY 11946 (S16) 723-0017 222 MIDaLE COUNTIW ROAD SMITliTOWN ExeCU11Ve PI..AZA. Sum 107 B SMITl-lTOW"'. LONG ISLAND. NY 11787 15161724-4600 WASHINGTON OFFICE: 502 CANNON House OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515-3201""'- 1202122~ffl tJ;::' Stp6. Ktz. 1"\S " , i7/ .,,(V-"-yo, J::' i'oPt response to your request, please be advised that Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 mandates that the federal government make available property, rights-of-way, and easements under its control for the placement of new spectrum-based telecommunications services. Hoping to be of further assistance I have contacted the U.S. General Services Administration's Office of Property Acquisition and Realty Services for more information on the use of federal property to site wireless antenna facilities. As soon as I receive any information from the GSA I will contact you. If you have any questions please feel free to contact my assistant Mr. Brian Fauls at (516) 345-9000, and he will be happy to help you. I appreciate your patience as we endeavor to address your concerns. Sincerely, ~L 0 Member 0 Congress ;;=;---~---> j i D 1 ~-~!~_. II n); Llu' f JAN 7 'c. ~ j........, I 1...-.._ ' SOU/Hew TCv\li;;---' PL5;f'iNING SOARD Ifni r2 'il ~I" n i 12 ll~ t:. " , . D -=-- :.-,:...-c,,,..: 'j n 'I ,. ~ :"!: j , I,,, "'1 6 'e "j il. I J1..lJ\ - '--'. i.,,:tJ;' ,....,...., i I SoUT1iAMPTON SOUT1iOI,.O MPF:bjf Enclosure aI'lOOf(l-.AVEN eAST !-lA"'f"TON i'lIVEI'IMEAD SHEl..T'ER ISl.AND SfYU"...TOWN ?I'IINTEo ON I'IECYCLEo PAPER ~U?S'Yis7jf.:';-~:':;:;:: ~:.: TO'f'.';': OF s"~!Jr":~-::I_:'; .~. "! ~aUll.;l J. . . FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU 2025 M Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20554 FACT SHEET #2 SEPTEMBER 17, 1996 NATIONAL WIRELESS FACILITIES SITING POLICIES The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the 1996 Act) contains important provisions concerning the placement of antenna structures and other facilities for use in providing personal wireless services. State and local governments have already been working closely whh wireless service providers to place such facilities within their localities. The new law estal,lishes a framework for the exercise of jurisdiction by state and local zoning authorities over the construction. modification and placement of facilities for persomtl wireless services. The new law also directs the Commission to offer assistance to state and iocal governments in resolving wireless fac..ilities siting issues. In that capacity, the Commission has formed a Wireless Facilities Siting Task Force to serve as a focal point for collection and dissemination of information relating to the efforts of state and local governments, as well as providers of personal wireless services, to address facilities siting concerns. 11,e Task Force believes it can serve as a valuable information resource for state and local governments and for the industry as they carry out the responsibilities assigned them under the new law. Proper implementation of l1:te new law will ultimately benefit the American public by preserving iocal zoning and land use authority, while at the same time, promoting the broad availability of these exciting new technologies. On April 23, 1996, the Wireless Teleco=unications Bureau issued Fact Shcct #1 to inform the public about the provisions of Section 704 of the 1996 Act, and lo a:ssist state and local g()ve=ents as they deal with the eomple.'{ issues of personal wireless facilities siring in their local communities. Fact Sheet #1 summarized key provisions of Section 704, reprinted the complete texL of Section 704 of the 1996 Act, provided lechnical information concerning personal wireless services, and, fmally, answered frequently asked questions. T.ais Fact Sheet #2 consists of four parts: . PART I is a new compilation of frequently asked questions and answers: . PART IT summarizes rhe Commission's radio frequency (RF) emission rulcs governing personal wireless services, adopted August 1, J 996, and sets fonh the most relevant RF mles for personal wireless facilities siting purposes; To: 41801:3l-- ~ram: ~i:Ut.t(AL i,.UlTlJl'll.l.t1llVI,,r-rl"lnl...m. -~- -~ ---_._-~- . . · PART m provides revise~ information about those pexsonal wireless services most likely to be submitting facilities siting requests during the upcoming year; and · PART IV consists of maps showing the geogrotphic area.~ used by !he Commission to license cellular radiotelephone servicc and personal wirelcss services, and lists licensees for certain personal cu=unications servicI::s. Fad Sheet #1 and Fact Sheet #2 on Natio/U1.1 Wireless Facilities Siting Policies are both available from thc Commission's "fllX-on-demand" !Jystem at (202) 418-2830. To obtain the 12-page Fact Sheet #1 from fax-on-demand, please reference Document Number 6507. To obtain the 39-page Fad Sheet #2, plesse rcference Document Number 6508. Both Fact Sheets (excluding the geographie area maps) are also available on the Internet, from the Wireless TeI==UJJications Bureau homepage, at http://www.fcc.gov/wtb/wirchome.html. In addition to the contacts listed elsewhere in lhis Fact Sheet #2, questions On the following general topics should be directed to the Commission staff listcd below: . The Telecommunications Act of 1996 in generd.!: Office of Legislative Voice: (202) 418-1900 and Intergovernmental Affairs Fax: (202) 418-2806 · Federal regulation of wireless communications services in general: Rosalind K. Allen. Voice: (202) 418-0600 Deputy Chief Fa.'C: (202) 418-0787 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau E-mail: rallen@fcc.gov . Antenna structure siting, licensing issues and technical matters: Steve Markendorff Voice: (202) 418-0620 Chief. Broadband Branch Fa..'l:: (202) 41 R-1412 Wireless TelecommUIt);ations Bureau E-mail: smarkend@fcc.gov . Commission guide1inl;:s all radiofrequeney emissions: RF Safety Program . Voice: (202) 418-2464 Office of Engineering Fa.x: (202) 418-1918 and Technoiogy E-mail: rfSafety@fcc.gov . TrEUl3mittel' power, antenna SlIucture painting and lighting re'1uirernents: D<IIl S. Emrick Voice: (202) 418-1170 Compliance Division fax: (202) 4 I 8-2813 Compliance and Infurmation Bureau E-mail: d"mrick@)fcc.gov 2 0: 4UIUtJ.l.--- rrom: rt;Ul:.I'U"II.. ..."..-.............................. . . . Additional questions on wireless facilities siting issues may be addressed to the following national governmental and trade associations: . American Planning Association Karen B. Graham Public Affairs AS"lciate Voice: (202) 872-0611 Fax: (202) 872-0643 . N ationa! Association of Counties Robert 1. Fogel Associate Legislative Director Voice: (202) 393-6226 Fax: (202) 393-2630 . National Association of Teleco=unications Officers and Advisors Eileen E. Huggard Voice: (202) 429-5101 &eC1.ttive Director Fax: (202) 223-4579 . National League of Cities Frank Shafroth Director of Policy and Federal Relations Voice: (202) 626-3026 Fax: (202) 626-3043 . United States Conference of Mayors Kevin S. McCarty Assistant &ecutive Director Voice: (202) 293-7330 Fax: (202) 293-2352 . American Mobile Telecommunications Association Jill Lyon Voice: (202) 331-7773 DirectOr of Re!;Ulatory Relations Fax; (202) 331-9062 . Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association Andrea D. Williams Voice: (202) 785-0081 Assistant General Counsel Fax: (202) 7&5-0721 Or Lauren Fry Manager for Industry Education , Voice: (202) 785-3236 Fa.x: (202) 887-1629 . Personal Communications Industry Association Mark J. Golden Voice: (703) 739-0300 x 3008 Senior Vl', Industry Affairs Fax: (703) 836-1608 3 ,. -.... ,-....,....- --_._----_.._---~ . . explains the intent of the conferees is to "provide localities with the flexibility to treat facilities that create different visual, aesthetic, or safety COIlCer.ll:i differently to the extent pem1itted under generally applicable zoning requirements even if those tacilities provide ttmctionally equivalent services. for example, the conferees do not intend thar jf a State ur local governmcnt grants a permit in a commercial district, it must also grant a permit for a competitor's 50-foot tower in a residential district." As a gene.a! matter, there appears to be an expectation that state and local governments should endeavor to avoid making land us" decisions that give One personal wireless service provider a competitive advantage over <Ulother. For one court's opinion on this issue, see Westel-Milwaukee Co., Inc. v. Walworlh Counry, No. 95-2097, 1996 WL 496670 (Wis. Cl App. Sept. 4, 1996). 14. What should I do if tlte state or local government Itas acted inconsLi.tently wit" Section 704, and I have been adversely affected? Answer: If the state or loca! gove=cntal action is inconsistent with Section 704, and you are adversely affected by such action, you may appeal the zoning authority's decision to a CO)lrt of <;ompetent jurisdiction. Congress' Conference Report which accompanied Section 704 states thm S1lCh actioDS may be filed in the [edem! district court in which the facilities are located Ur a State court of competent j1lrisdietion, al the option of the party appealing the decision. Section 704 also requires that such action be filed in C01lrt within 30 days after the state Or local government acts or fails to act, and courts are directed to mle expeditiou~ly un such cases. If the deci~ion of a state or local government authority which adversely aff,,<;ts yuu i~ based on the env;rolUnenlal eLIe<;ts of radiofrequency emissions, such decision may be appealed to the courts or it may be appealed directly to the Commission through a req)lcst 1'01' Declaratory Ruling, pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Commission's Rules. Either WlIY, however, the appeal must b" filed within 3 0 days after the stat.e or local &>Qvernment's action. 15. What call tile federal govl!rnmenl do 10 acc()mm()date multiple providers of personal wireless serviees in seeking antenna strllcturl! locations? Answer: Section 704 of the 1996 Act mandates that the federal government make available rropeny, rights-ot~way, and easements under ib control for the placement of new spectrwn- based telecomm1lnications services. It also provides that a presumption may be established lu grant such requests absent unavoidable direct conflict with the government's mission or planned use of the locations, and that the decisions regllrding siting on Sllch locations must be fair, reasonable, md nondiscriminatory. On August 10, 1995, President Clinton issued an Executive Memorandum directing the Administrator of the Genetal Services Administration (GSA), in coordination with (>lher federal government departments and agencies, to develop p.ocedures to facilitate appropriate access 10 fedel'a! property for the siting of mobile services antenna struct1lres. In response to this order and the Congressional mWldate, GSA has "",,,ared a manual entitled "Govel'lunenl- 11 . . . Wide Procedures for Placing ConllllJ."'rCial Antennas," which is published in Volume 61, page 14100 of the Federal Register, issued on March 29, 1996. For more information on the use of federal property to site wireless antenna facilities, please contact James Herbert, Office of Property Acquisition and Realty Services, Public Building Service, General Services Administration, at (202) 501-0376, or write to GSA at 18l.h & F Streets, NW, Washington, DC 20405. Section 704 also mandated the Commission to provide technical SUpport to states in order to encourage them to make property, rights-of-way and easements under their jurisdiction available for the placement of new spectrum-based telecommunications services. For more information on how the Commission can be of assistance: to the stale and local governments in this area, please COfltact SIeve Markendorff, Chief of !.he Broadband Brmcn, Commercial Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at (202) 418-0620, or fax (202) 418-1412, or email "srnarkend@fcc.gov." RADIOFREOUENCY IRF) E:MISSTONS 16. Does Section 704 preempt staLe and local governments from basing regulation of {he placement, construction or modlfwation of penonal wireless facilities diTl!:ctly or iJldirectly 011 the environmental effects of RF emissions? Answer; Yes. Section 704 states thllt "No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may ,'egulate the phlcement. construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissiuns to the C>..1:ent that sllch facilities comply with lhe Commission' 5 regulations concerning such emissions. II 17. Have any studies been conducred on potential health hazards of locating an antenna structures cln.~e to re~idential cQmmuniti(!S? Answer: Many governmental ageno:les, seienlists, engineers and professional associations have conducted .ortudies of exposure levels due to RF emissions from cellular t:ran:,mitter facilities. These levels have been found to be typically thousands of times bellOW the levels considered to be safe by expert enlilies such as the Tnstirure of f:!eelrical and Electronics Engineers. lnc. (IEEE), and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), as refl"(.1:ed in the Commission's rules governing RF emi.ssions. 18. Has the Commission adopted I'ew guidelines for evalUJlting RF e:r:pasures? Answct'; Yes. In light of revised guidelines developed by the Institute of Electrical and Flectronics Engineers, Inc. and adopted by thc Amcrican National Standards Insumte in 1992 (ANSIIIEEE C95.1-l992), the Commissiun initiated a proceeding in 1993 to determine whether the C.ommission should adopt these guidelines to replace the 1982 ANSI guidelines. Section 704 of the 1996 Act required the Commission to complete this rulemaking proceeding [2 ;;:~~~)1~~n~~~~~,~:;',:;\~;~::\~'.,;:., ':,",.~~ _",;,...~,:'. -J' ,:j'~{~1fA~G'B8AR.D'~ERs RICHARD G, WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCIDE LATHAM. JR BENNETT ORLOWSIG. JR WILLIAM J, CREMERS KENNETH L, EDWARDS I . Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa< P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTH OLD TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Richard G. Ward, Chairman ~ Request for Coordination November 27, 1996 BoarcL..oLAEPeals rW [Jl~@ 0 Vcf ~rml IWIGDEC ~ 2 /'r'Jru., .f!! I!,! , "::0 II/I, t_ ' ---Ji!:. --- FROM:! RE: DATE: David and Bonnie Pascoe 51100 Main Road, Southold SCTM# 1000-70-2-7 The' Planning Board has reviewed the site plan for the above property and finds the on-site parking adequate for the principal use of professional office Use. The Board granted a waiver from site plan requirements for tills change from home occupation to professional office use on November 6, 1996, (copy attached). Bell- A tlantic/NYNEX 24850 Main'Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 The Planning Board is not in favor of tills use at tills location. The residential nature of the area will be compromised by tills one hundred foot (100') structure. Both the Planning Boar.d and the Zoning Board should encourage the applicant to find a loc~tion more suitable for a structure of tills type, such as at the fire house or at the Plum Island ferry site. Kid N' Rouuu. -J _.u.C.l.c;:;u. 46455 County Road 48, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-2-21 As mentioned in a previous memorandum, tillS location does not have a approved site plan. The Planning Board will contact Mr. Anthony Pirrera, the owner of the center to encourage illm to complete ills site plan. '-.", . .-~.,-.....~._. - ~"~""'~ _.~ ,~......, """"-.'..' -. -, ..:... . -, -.." . I-f fD // 1~-- . ... Su-~ ~ 1'.8-~ SAVIK (~MURRAY CONSULTINGENGIN.EERS~ 2110 SMITHTOWN AVENUE, RONKONKOMA, NEW YORK 11779(516) 467.7775. PAX (518) 487.7840 November 6, 1996 Town of South old Planning Board Town Hall - 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 c.neGt in dra.weK' RE: BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE ORIENT POINT CELL SITE - SCTM# 1000/018/06/005, SITE PLAN ApPLICATION Dear Sir/Madam: Submitted herewith for your consideration is a site plan and construction plans for a proposed unmanned wireless (cellular) telephone facility to be operated by Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, a public utility. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. lasco, P.E. imD1f-@ [~ IT \VI i~ !.;Im~ In. ,. I) 1.1t! : NOV 7 /99):' -'---->_.~ SOUIHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD INDEX Oassllleds ...;............. LSI8 Opinions/Letters........... 14 Penon.. Dialogue ..... 1.523 County Wide Angle ...... II Eye on Long Island ... LS12 WEST HEMPSTEAD Vol. J, No. /} .. our 0 ce n t Ie onununl . ~ TOWER IMPACT STATEMENT RELEASED Statement finds no alternate sites; public hearing to be held October 8 BV STUA.RT MARKUS The New York State Office of Parks. Recreation. and HistorIc Preservation, in accordance with the State Envlron- ments from the state office, Bell Atlantic MobIle and ils consulting firm, exit 17 sits just north of center in an egg~shaped I'aeea of service deficiency, n a zone where cellular , to the tower, would range from 282 to 1800 times less than Federal safety thresholds for continuous exposure. No Jonizing.type radlatlon- such as x-rays or nuclear radia- tion- which is dangerous at much lower levels, would come from the tower. According to the statement, the facUlty would have minimal ecological Impact, temporarIly displacing only some mourn- Ing doves which use the area to rest and could find space elsewhere during con- . strucllon. No threatened or endangered species of animals or plants live In the loop. The" Footprint" ofthe facUlty would be less than five percent of the total area within the cloverleaf. The statement also says that none oC the alternative siles suggested at the scoplng meeting In July would work, as none are In the zone of deficiency. It also ruled out the use of smaller "mlnl-cell" tow';'s MnI'OtiiltI.if~asonpafkw"Y streetlights, saying that the topography of the land and trees and the need for the antennas to Hseen customers' phones would "make such a solution unworkable. It also said that no competitor's towers are within the zone, making such co-location impossible. Also of Interest, the DElS says that the state Department of Transportation was already planning to pul a 50- foot mono- pole tower in the cloverleaf to mount a trafflc-monitoring camera. The camera could be housed on the Bell Atlantlc tower. A report within the DElS by the Breslin Appraisal Company, Inc., on Impacts to property values states "negatlve.lmpacts to property values that may exist for homes bordering the parkway 'are the result oL.their proximity to the parkway,'" Le. the tower would not have an additional effect. Also of concern to nearby homeowners, the tower is designed to withstand winds up to 85 miles per hour, which "exceeds the 50 year maximum anticipated wind velocity." The state- ment notes that towers of this type have survived hurricanes Hugo and Andrew, with winds of 115 MPH. West Hempstead Civic Association Ex. ecutlve DlrectorSeth Bykofsky reiteratedhis opposition to the proposal and said he hopes to see a large turnout at the public hearing. Cople> ~ 'he DEIS are also avail. able at Hempstead Town Hall and the Nassau County Planning Commission. Comments may be directed to Edward Wankel at the OPRHP regional office, Belmont Lake State Park, 1'.0. Box 247, Babylon, NY 11702, 669~ 1000 or Thomas Lyons, OPHHP Environmental Manage- ment, Agency Building 1, Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12238. (518) 474-0409. A computer simulated view of the proposed tower, from the Southern State eastbound, by Creative Visuals, Inc. and Virtually Real, Inc. mental Quality Review Act of the Envi- ronmental Conservation Law, has is- sued the Draft Environmental Impact Statement on the Beli Atlantic Mobile cellular phone antenna tower, proposed to be built In the loop of Southern State Parkway exit 17n (off the eastbound ianes.) The document, whichconststsofsev~ eral hundred pages and 11 appendices including blue prints, sketches, maps, charts, drawings. and independent re. ports, Is avaIlable for review at the West Hempstead, Malverne, Lakeview, and RockVille Centre Public Ubraries, as well as the Hempstead Lake State Park Office and the OPRHI' admlnlstrallon building in Belmont Lake State Park. A publtc1teartl'lg to ,oIidt comments on the DEIS will be held on Wednesday, October 8, at 7:30 p.m. at Wesl Hempstead High School, 400 Nassau Boulevard. Public comments will also he accepted by the OPIHIP until Octo~ ber 24, at which tim(' the Environmen- tal Impact Statement will br finalized .1IH"I the Parks office ,.viII Jlwke its final dl'dslon a minimum of ten days later. According (0 the report, other state. phone transmissions are spotty, and subject to interference or loss of service. Because vital public services, such at police, fire, and "mbulance radio dispatching are cW-Ied by this method as well, the zone of deficiency Is a public risk as well, according to the document. The solullon, according to Bell Atlanllc Mobile, Is to buIld an 84-foot tall tower inside the cloverleaf loop, with an antenna array. The faciIltywould also Include a 12 by 30-foot equipment shed and a parklng spot for one car. Accordingtotheplan, the tower would be a monopole, rather than the tradi- tionallattice-work tower, 36 inches in diam. eter at the bottom, tapering to.J8lnches on top. It would have a "candelabra.style an. tenna array, and be painted a hydro-blue color. The shed would be faced In stone to match the nearby parkway overpass. The agreement, if approved, would cover a 20 year period, over which lIell Atlantic Mobile would pay the Parks Department $450,000. The proposed antennas would he for raM' dio.type broadcast transmissions, in the freM qUf'llcy range that had ht'rn lIsf'd by UHF television stations since the 19605. Electro. magnetic field strength at various sHes close Shut . Quieti. ish famlll; Franklin S new syna~ port and> synagogu, In., posit! thodox po rented ho donated p forward to 1I0nal the: reached bJ. McC~ alSQ- CarolYl ice who h, Congressw on volunte vice next l\ High Scho< Invited. Pi What at the Lecture7 plays. And brary was I ing dusty 0 at whatls g( chance to i cal office 0 Ing? Check 0 ber - you m, yes they're tool Krivo: . coum Dr.Jame of the comi, against Repl seat in the t Acknowl the race a~ Krivo says h raise several sitize the pu A LINE CONNEC ING 2 A L @ MAIN RD IS N 32" 47' 59,2" W OF TRUE. NORTH, USE THIS HEADING TO DETERMINE SECTOR ORIENTATION, SEE PLAN ABOVE, "-l. . ' ~ t>/ /,/ ~\ti;./ ~/ I I BETA I 222' I NORTH 1 '" "'_~sLJ.19 I' AGL 1 Q~ , . T.O, ANTENNA AMSL 1039' ~83.8' ~ 1.0, ANTENNA -'--~?L 101.8' AGL 81.6' A ANTENNA ~ ALL SECTORS ~ SECTOR ANTENNA SEE ADJACENT PLAN FOR ORIENTATION, SEE MONOPOLE M/lNUF DWGS. FOR MOUNTING DEl AIL'.). !YP. FOR ALL ANrt:NNA --- ----- AMSL 100. I' AGl80,O' ~ TO. MONOPOLE ~j ~) I o o -H , o I o 0) I ~ 100"-0. "'0" 'OHOP,,", B'<. EH~H"REO ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED" CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO MANUFACTURERS CONSTRUCTION DWGS ANO SPECIFICATIONS FOR EXACT SIZE AND TYPE. ---- -' - 11'-8" X 40'-0" PRE-MANUFACTURED EQUIPMENT SHELTER BY "F1BREBONO" CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO MANUFACTURERS CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS 10 COORDINATE CONC FOUNDATION AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS, REFERENCE: LIB f :) 4 J 2. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DESIGNATION: DIST. 1000, SEC. 018, BLK. 06, LOT 005. J POSSESSION, IF ANY, NOT SHOWN. 4. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN SUFFOLK COUNTY DATUM (AMSL) A LINE CONNECTING 2 NA LS S @ MAIN RD IS N 32" 47' 59.2" W OF TRUE NORTH. USE THIS HEADING TO DETERMINE SECTOR ORIENTATION. SEE PLAN ABOVE. I I 8E' I 22: r " /'(; ~c SECTOR ANTENNA SEE ADJACENT PLAN FOR ORIENTATION, SEE MONOPOLE MANUF DWGS. FOR MOUNTING DETAILS. TYP. FOR AL L ---------- ANIT.NNA --- 1 ........ " ~ ~ -Ii H , b 0 100'-0" I I it iJ 0 0 ENDEAVO co 0 O'l REFER T' fT1 ~ owes N .-< ----- (1) .., P lD -. AND TYP' aJ :u C ~l --< ;0 X .-j IV X x I c "J I I - 11'-8" ~ ;0 0 0 EOUIPME fT1 fT1 CONfRAC " z CONSTRLJI 10 coor I OTHER F .c ~/'..l ~ T ENTRANCE PlATFORM FOR TYP. ,EE X/A-2. X 40' -0" PRE - MANUFACruRED :NT SHELTER BY "FIAREBONO" TOR TO REFER TO MANUFACTURERS CTION DRAWINGS AND SPEr.IFlCAlIONS RDINATE CONC. FOUNDATION AND REOUIREMENTS. .' ~UNTED Ale UNIT BY SHELTER fYP. lElAIL AND DIMENSIONS @ ER FOUNDATION SEE I/A-2 llllMN CABLE TRAY SUPPORT SEMBL Y FOR ROUTING .ANTENNA FROM EQUIPMENT SHELTER TO lLE. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION lCATlON OF H.A.TCH PLATE V-I.F. fAIL 4/A-2. FO M L J, NOW OR FORMERLY OF ANDERSON 2. J. 4. - ANTENNA AND CABLE .SCHEDULE (SEE NOTES THIS SHEET) --.- w ANTEN~ CABLE:R ANTENNA CABLE CAOLE CONNECTION AIF CABLE u LENGTH ANTENNA <{ NUM8E NUMAE SYSTEM TYPE NO. TYPE "- ANTENNA SHELTER '72r' (1) END . END " l--WHT ARX-D LDF5-50A L5PDM L5PDF AIF -0 ~ 1 95' ALP 9212 I"- ATX-O LDF5-50A L5POM L5PDF AIF-O 95' 2 2--WHT ALP 9212 <( I J FUTURE /'L -' - +--- <f. 4 -WHT ARX-I LDF5-S0A L5POM l.SPDF AIF-O 95' ALP 9212 4 " 5 I-BLU BRX-Q LDFS- 50A 1.5PDM LSPDF AIF -0 95' ALP 9212 '", - L5PDM " 6 2--ALU BTX-O LOFS-50A LSPOF AIF -0 95' ALP 92 1 2 1"-. <C 7 FUTURE .' t., - L5PDM LSPOF-- --- c-- m 4-ALU BRX-1 LDFS-50A AIF-O 95' ALP 921'2 8 " 9 FUTURE ~ -- -- 1------ --_. I"- 10 FUTURE <( - -- -~.--- ---~-- ~ 11 FUTURE ::; <( 12 FUTURE " NOTES -" ,." r j:'" ~ If' (" '"" !f1I~lr "'''TAil ^1I0N i~."2-YrL". MARK WITH [2] f .- '-- SITE PLAN ------ ---- 8' -0' tOCKABLE / I -f" . I b I o LA'El ~ESS ,,~ SEE PART SITE PLAN ABOVE FOR EXACT LOCATION. ~ x 6'-0" HIGH GALV. STEEL CHAIN LINK fENCE AND 8' -(f' LOCKING GATE AS INDICATED SEE TYPiCAl DETAIL JjA-2. . 22'-8" i ...,1- , ~ ~-,-- -, 40'-0" . . t b I '0() . --- , / '" \ \ x. ~ I ro -1: f-lC CONCRETE EN DETAIL SEE X 11'-8" X 40' EQUIPMENT S: CONTRACTOR T( CONSTRUCTION TO COORDINA OTHER REQUI WAl.L MOUNTEC MANUF. TYP. . ~ MQIE; fOR DETAIL SHELTER f( t- PIPE COllJM~ ARM ASSEMB' I CABLES fROf >,!ONOPOIE. r ,~. i ~ I " L", ' ;~ ~ ~ It. ,', J' ";1 ""f." "-.. jr,l; .!.': ~ 'I)';:';". . ~~'I;!': ,. .11'. ..' ,., '.. "'1 1~. '. I. ')". . , ~,:,' I {"'j f'!j'. ;...., "', . . P'l". I, '~,:', : I" . J. " ,'t-o . " ,:<';1 ',j, "i; '1,'-.;, "1:.",' , ';!~ ;{;' ~; :,: ,j ,.: ',: ^.,< ,~ . {~~::i ,::/ \~' , .' .,'1, ,. ~ Or:, f-~ . '';\,,',' (r:/. '~ 1: ~,. i", ' \;:."j, {I~':i:.l , " .1,' I~': ' ," :;:.\";'(,. .....'.' "',j '. ' k;'" . . :\T1~ ,::',"-~.; , ';.~l y~I\'.. ('" ,\i,l'"ll' . 'j '7,11"';' ''tl;' ,,"; "".,.. ri(<:I'~ , t:\F . .~t~. '.;'.' . , ~1(." ,.. 1.': I,:,' , ~: f i; i \ , }f:';l{ 1('.' 'J. . ,\." 1 ~~I\r:: .'.' : ;:\:. ~ .:. . ~" -.1."1 ; 1.....1' ,I.....: ,,' jo!'l ',. . ',' ". ';, ::' .:_.1.::fl ~~! "., ,. ~> .: '..' . . ,~l~,.,i>. ',' '.: ,. '1" 'l' .", .,',' ~~ . .~ , " ,.. I~~"-J.'r'- . :.... :"', . '.' J: ~'" :', ',:' r: '" , ". ~ '. j;:;t~: '. ';"<. ;+'i~", .'.(, '.. .., t ~ ., . . .. 11t,!'I,; "I: : . I ..., a~:'Y:j::':~ '>~:) ',~.~-,~. \l~': ;~, " '., I,' \1{.".;,. , .',", . .' . '1;\ ('. ~ '. (. ..... 1:)':",,;!' ", " \. .i' ~ . '. " , ~ t I' '. . '. , .'.". . ':.' ;,( (.- -:' ~'1)','" ';' .t.", 'M.tJ~':'" ',rr,",,' _' ,,'I.,:: :, ':;~ :.)~ i ~' ...) " \ .' ,'- .~: ~, . ). '.5~" < , '. ~---._...-..-.." SCALE: 1 .~ .,. . " '. -' ",. .'. ~. - 56-;~"(f' - .-.-.---- --- ,8'-0" tCCKAOLE ~^rE.:"" / --.---- .~ t . 40' )(---- -x ~ 221-8" ~ rt 7~ ,-- ~. x- x---------x___...._ ""'"--__ SCALE:.l 8 .. 1 '-0 " ".; ::.: i: ACCESS DRIVE SEE PART SITE PLAN ABOVE FOR E.XACT LOCAnON. " " >< /~ ~:Y 1::lQIE; roR ADDITIONAL SITE INFORMATION SEE SITE PLAN l/A-l, ,., . .~ J if" . I' ~.' ',' '); 6'-0" HIGH GAlV. STEEL CHAIN LINK FENCE AND 8' -0" LOCKING GAiE AS INOICArED SEE lyrICAl DONl J!A-2. , ..,: '2, . PART CONSTRUCTI~ J . ':;!<: ,. Revision . ; 'J~-; ." ',r'.. !".;,' >< I ---- .". -~ -- , , ..1, " I' . ,,' ~.. ("" t- 9-2().J96 . ~-D6-96 8-22:"96 0Clt. .,!. .,' " o.setfpllon '.'ISSUEorOR FILING ISSUED. roR BANM ISSUEOI='OR aANM , .. 100" REVIEW 60" REVIEW .':1 ..!':.;.,: ,r~"'l' ,'- /'i' : ., I.': ~...., '. v I. ',," . . ., ~ '. .. . ~' " "', . ','l .,\.i ?>.,,^~2"~--"--"~":'''''''IT'';~ '" '. -. , '.. ' i, ~: ' , ;; ~ .' "'::'-:;::.:' ) '. , . "lii ..j ~ J .......__....-.... 'I.': '1,. ~:~':', <,,', I,' ~'; I f..., I ;" .H) i ;~':-, "i ~" 'I' '.....,,' :~;: 'I 'i '~! .1"\, . 'AI 'I' " , ,'I"'!', ';'.., . I' - ~ ,1/ :, ' ~\~ ~, .'. i" ,: I t. I ',~ v,<, .'11' ' I:':Jt "'.'[ i~:.(."+" ii'!' I' " ,l; '.j " .. " ' ~;j . '\ ,I,:' E':, ':''1, ' ,', , ;,;::. : i' [ I L, ,I , " ., I I I :'1. " I ?"/'I, ~/ I ~~'r:" ',! J':' , I ~,C'I': 01.\' _, ~ i' ~;HI l\'~ :' '\ ',:1, i'""'~~,',;,,'~'~i 'J~r!.", ;,,{'., ~;\:I , ~:~;:~:j,l ' I..,:", ': ~ 1 ,., i' ~~ ' , I /1' ..I,', , ~ ,< : '.- .',,-', :,., ',' ~ \ '. I ',A,: " ~r: >:r~~ " I ~; J. ~'-. ',,"',', j "l."'-',! ~ '. :;; :~I i )\~ I ,,1,1 t~~~.','J ;,,:'''''1' if' " .:~( .:~II /t' ':, ,~,;' I ~ ~:'i. ! '!:~i' "II ~,'!I "l' " ' ~;'~ I. r' , '. I,', I . ( ~,' '.,j.. : ': I " I '(',!, ,ij' f;' ,l" '! "f ',:, p':. : I Gl\ D'WGS\ 96-723\A-l ~ 'f ' ,,,,-,, 10~3~96 '10'08'19,01"1 EST (8 ;ET "^" --/,' 'Ilk:" I I r;,' , 'N &,'f:- .0 , c:5 . / ED ~ , PA , / " I ."" ~ ii) ;;; I .b -, ~ i; I ~ ' . / 1'-- ~ ''J ~/ 'e-.. / I C(5 SET NAIL \ " ~ ,t, / V rNO STONE ,I ' '. .': Q - -,'. ,~' n i ,';1",;, t ( , '~ J UTILITY POLE NO, 165 ~!J,.E" f._~AN ---- ,,8'-0. I1lCI<A8LE CATE. / I Y b I o ,- L j :.,,' I I (N 37 ~ i!i [d'~ ,.., - ... _. -~~~~.~ . ..-c . ,.- -x-- x~_.~_. 22'-8" 'l [ ... I I. lI! 2 AIF-O 95' ALP 9212 AIF-O 95' ALP 9212 ilIF-O 95' ALP 9212 AlF-O 95' ALP 9212 AIF-O 95' ALP 9212 -- - ~IF-O 95' ALP 9212 !~ !~ ,." if j~ ..., z DWGS FOR MOUNTING DETAILS. TYP. FOR ALL __- ANTENNA. __ ti b I o o +i , o I o 0) I~ AMSL 103.9' ACL 83.8' ~ T.O, ANTENNA "" AMSL 101.8' AGL 81.6' rio. ~ENNA ~ ALL SECTORS V AMSL 100. I' AGL 80,0' 1.0. MONOPOLE ,,\/ ~i-/ 100'-0" HIGH MONOPOLE BY " ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED" CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO MANUFACTURERS CONSTRUCTION OWGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EXACT SIZE AND TYPE. 11'-8" X 40'-0" PRE-MANUFACTURED EQUIPMENT SHELTER BY "F1BREBONO" CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO MANUFACTURERS CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPEClnCATIONS 10 COORDINATE CONC. FOUNDATION AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS. 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE OF SHElTER ROOF A/C UNIT SEE MANUF. DWGS AND MECH OWGS. -' ~ :2' L., . ~-.~~--~~ ~;. ~ " . MARK WITH [2] )N, MARK EACH END SYSTEM DESIGNATION. 'NLY. CONTRACTOR ENLARGED ANTENNA LAYOUT PLAN SCALE; 1/4" = 1 '-0" \NUFACTURED FOR : CONCRETE CAISSON, DESIGN BY MONOPOLE MANUF. MONOPOLE AND ANCHOR-- BOLTS SEE MANUF. DESIGN OWGS, ALIGN ANCHOR BOLTS AS INDICATED TO ORIENT ANTENNA AND PLATFORM AS REQUIRED. V,I.F. 3 ..' -. ........->~,_I7-;~_-~,.'~--'0'.: --.. - I I I : I : I ~N~ or -r~NO~;1ON -BELOW -Ii -- + -- - ~ - - - -- -' . SEE 1/2/A-2. /~ I Dl"nlor" RElL AnAN1lC NVNEX MOOIlE, It<<:, I I MOBILE em SITE INSTALLAIION CONC, CAISSON, SEE MONOPOLE /!: t.IAtl RO. (ORIENT PI. SEARCH ARfA) MANUF. DESIGN DWGS. . :: SOUTH OLD, NEW YORK L.,;____J .. , -:--~-....,;~...,..-- _....:"'":'> AGL 0.0' . AMSL 20. 1'~ GRADE ":.. I (f) NORTH MONOPOLE ORIENT A llON PLAN . SCALE; 1/4" = 1'-0" ,. f' @ ~AEt~ ,Eo-LEV A TION . LONGITUDE: LATITUDE; 7'1: 17' 43.5".' 41' 08' 42.9" ;" Je9criplion: SITE PLAN,. CONSTRUCTION PLAN , ELEy A 110NS AND CABLE SCHEDULES ." ", .. C CONSULTANTS INC. . , OONITRlHC - TECHNICAL S!:IMCES ~ CONsTRUCTION lWW'.fIolENT sum: II.. 3~ VETERANs lIEiIORIAL HIGHWAY RONKONKOMA N.Y, 11779 (516) 981-3990 FAX (516) 981-3971 001..: 8""20-96 Drown By; SRS Scote: AS NCJTEO Checked By. TRl' , 96-1275 96-723 Drawinq No: I. . , '. Project No: A~1 2 I I I ".-'; .' Own<< Projecl No; Sheet Of ',. ~-'l' /1 \. .... \ . . .." '.'. . . .,' '..C. . )(~" Il 22'-8" >- 'b I in -- .' I . ~ .1 . I ~ I ~ I I 'lIVE .\N x "' -; N , OJ +- .~ I I x ;!: x I x x x ) R 'A ~ , x ............ 18'-8":1: x x / V.I.F. " 5'-0" ~. ./ ~ <to -- . ~ SITE INFORMATION SEE SITE PLAN 1/A-1, .f .' .., 1.\JUII~Mt.NT;)I1t.L1t.tC1H tltlKttlUNU CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO MANUFACTURERS CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFlCATIONS TO COORDINATE CONC. FOUNDATION AND OTHER. REQUIREMENTS. . ; ):., WALL MOUNTED A!C UNIT BY SHELTER MANUF.. TYP. . -.. . tlQIE; FOR DETAIL AND DI....ENSIONS 0 SHELTER FOUNDATION SEE 1/A-2.. PIPE COLUMN CABLE TRAY SUPPORT ARM ASSEMBLY FOR ROUTING ANTENNA CABLES FROM EQUIPMENT SHELTER TO MONOPOLE. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH LOCATION OF HA.TCH PLATE V.I.F. SEE DETAIL4/A-2. 100'-()" HIGH MONOPOLE BY " ENGINEERED' ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED" CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO MANUFACTURERS CONSTRUCTION DWGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EXACT SIZE AND TYPE. SEE NOTE BELOW. FOR ANTENNA ORIENTATION ENlARGED DIAGRAI.I SEE ADJACENT. REFER TO MONOPOLE MANUF. OWGS FOR EXACT MOUNTING DETAILS. , '., .'.- ...., ~. ',~ '~.. , .~ .".... ~ONSTRUCTlON. PI1AN/ ANTENNA'LAYOUT PLAN . I' 0'" - . ~-,., . .gla'M~f~A')'::~' . ':: :-.~." ;.," '.. ISSUED FOR FILING ISSUED FOR BANM 100% REVIEW ISSUED FOR ElANM 60% REVIEW '. '-"-,,...' .'.-: . ," .. Project 1ocoIioic" .~ u ANltN~F lAtlLt ANltNNA CAtSLt I...AULt. LVI'fl'it..\..IIVI'I ""r L[ NGT~ Lt NUMBE NUMBER SYSTEM TYPE ANTENNA SHELTER NO '72r. (1) END . END .. 1-Wl-IT ARX-O LDF5-50A LSPDM L5Por AIF-O 9' . . 1 .) -..!!! .... 2 ATX-O LOFS-50A LSPDM L5POF AIF-O 9:" 2-WHT <( I 3 FUTURE n. -' L5PDM -< 4 4".WHT ARX-l LDF5-S0A l.SPDF AIF-O 9S' & S 1-BLU BRX-O LDFS-SOA ISPDM L5PDF AIF -0 95' 'lIO LOFS-SOA L5PDM LSPDr AIF-O 95' ;:::::. 6 2-BLU BTX -0 -< 7 FUTURE t. - CD 4-BLU BRX-l LDF5-S0A LSf-'UM LSPDF AIF-O 95' 8 .. 9 FUTURE ~ - .... 10 FUTURE -< :; 11 rUTURE :; <( 12 FUTURE ~, NOTES: 1) MARK CABLE ENDS DURING INSTALLATION. i.e. "2-YEL". MARK WITf- BANDS YELLOW TAPE. AT CO....PLETlON OF INSTALLATION, ....ARK EAC OF CABLE WITH BRASS TAG ENGRAVED WITH ANTENNA SYSTEM OESIC 2) CABLE LENGTHS SHOWN FOR ESTIMATING PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRI SHALL FIELD MEASURE, CUT AND RECORD. 3) COVER CABLE JOINTS WITH" 3M COLD SHRINK", AS MANUFACTURED . ANDREWS. NOTES: 1. IT IS THE ERECTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT AlL PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES unUZED DURING ASSEMBlY AND ERECTION WORK REOUlREO ON THE 1I0N0P0CE. DO NOT ENllANGER THE SAFIJY OF ANY PERSONNEL NOR THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE TOWER. 2. THE ENGINEERING DESIGN OF THE ANTENNA POLE AND ITS FOUNDAnON SHAl.L BE BY OTHERS. DOCUMENTATION or THE DESIGN SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY . AND CONCURRENTLY Wlnl mESE DOCUwtNTS. 3. 11{ EJ(jINEERI~ OCSIGN lJ" THE PRE HAlU'ACTURED EllUIP. SIIlTER SHALL BE BY OTlUS. IO:lKNTATlON or THE DESIGN SHALL BE SUBt.IITTED SEPARATELY . . AND CONCURRENTLY WITH mESE OOCUI.lENTS.' Orowi"'l Description: .. .\- '@l$ell Atlantic: NYN~ Mobile ...,:.~MOBILE CELL SITE INSTALLATION,' . .. >'. MAIN ROAD' (ORIENT PT. SEARCH AREA) . . '. SOUTHOLD...;NEW .YORK . ...."., ~.c; t------l :r:,~: e::::: c; .-:- ::s;: -;<,', , .~~- n...:riplion J , ~ 12-2_IINt.I[tUEI,kY.nm.VlIIll__.IIAl.l"J'l- . , . . ~'. ", .;~-' \ : ,- I ,J ~., ","'L' .~ --- -":.- TAX LOT 5 'VACAm" )Li1 ::0 TO BE LAND RLY OF KARCHER, iR FORMERLY OF ANDERSON I, , TAX LOT 149 --' .",', ------- GENERAL NOTES 1. BEARINGS SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS PR DEED REFERENCE: USER 9584 PAGE 472 2. SUFFOLK COUNTY- TAX MAP DESIGNATION: DIST. 1000, SEC. 018, BLK. 06, LOT 005. 3 POSSESSION, IF ANY, NOT SHOWN, 4, ELEVATIONS SHOWN HE.REON ARE IN SUFFOLK COUNTY DATUM (AMSL) lONGITUDl;: LATITUDE: 72' 17' 43.5" 41' 08' 42.9" A LINE CONNECTING (2) NAILS SET IN PAVING @ MAIN RD IS N 32" 47' 59,2" W OF TRUE NORTH, USE THIS HEADING TO DETERMINE SECTOR ORIENTATION. SEE PLAN ABOVE. " ,:"".., . -~'.: '"~ 1157.25' " , ~"" ,en ," ~" I~ I~ \~: \~ FND STAKE ',." .' .:'" TAX LOT 268 .. ~~ ~~ I - I nO " r"l ' l>8 r- o 142587' CALC. 1425.75' DEED TN~' ,,54'01'13,'" CAM~A I '~PHA 342 ./" ~02' ".,-;;f'-,~'"~ ~,:j I I BETA , 222' -..... (f!j) I NORTH . . '/ . ..~ .?~~~~. '. " . ',' ,:-i. :. ':':,.~v~ . -- .~ ~':,j '~:..;rf~ ,;;"j,' . :. .~. .;Y~ -'~ , ".j 1,;:..: .'; ~ . :.,' . , ' i'<.~..,: :"',-",,' .," ",' ... ", ,', , '. " , '. .? A-I 10-3~96 o 'J o t , UTILITY POLE NO. 165 LAN 0" 10,08:190.1"\ EST If) "> ~ . rL 1 . , I-I f I (8 37 10' SO. W) F' -.-,.... , , . . N . I~ I ". /~ '" I,~ . _-~-----_ ;. .~ ~~-~--,~ ",-" . --:~~";" s::l """ "..,.-, I t, '" J' . , , . ... ;' '. ,\" ' .; . '- ' , , C') / '" ,....,'.-' .. /'" -....' .,~, " 9:)/ " '. 'j... . ....'.. ii '.' >7!o';'~~ __ [65.00: I~"' , TAX LOT 7 ..~,. q' TAX LOT 6 REPUTED TO BE LAND fORMERLY OF STROHMEYER FORMERLY TERRY, . NOW OR FORMERLY WASHBURN .. ,;" (8 37 10~ po. E) _ .'~..'_~:<:'.';:'~~- .:" ~:.....~..:~ ..... ~- .,'.......:{ ... ~&..~: ',; I. '..~ ~ ,. f" ""- 10' WIDE GRAVEL AC~ESS i I DRIVE SEE DETAIL 3!A-2, : I I I \ \ \ ACCESS VEHICLE TURN AROUND TYP, '1 EDGE OF EX PAVEMENT '~ ~ tr , ~ 0/,_ 'i? ~ V FND S~ONE . (N 37 40' 20. W) i :., , SET NAIL --" , f f f ~ f f,J f & f <:> . I <:> ~ f 1 I ..... f ~ I .::! I i; I ... f ; I f f SET NAIL"\ / , '" ~,-, TAX LOT 8, " .;......... ".;,';. . , . \ .\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I , I ~?'O' .f . '~ 1 R I ':.11., I '. . . 'tAt .,' . I _' I . I I I I I I I I / / / /. / - - - ~.;,.."" --~ b I --- o N <.0 _(0 '" ... 50' .'1: 138'-4" \ \ \ \ , , , " . , . , , , " , .....,...... . ' -., " , ,~ ----------- '"' , . : '~~-j '. ,v ',J' j I' ,) 'k. ,....., F=lc ~~i ~ .~ t. . TAX LOT 14,5 6'-0" HIGH GALV, STEEL CHAIN LINK FENCE AND 8'-0" LOCKING GATE AS INDICATED SEE TYPICAL DETAIL 2/A-2, 11'-8" X 40'-0" PRE-MANUFACTURED EQUIPMENT SHELTER BY . FIBRE BONO" CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO MANUFACnJRERS CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFlCAnONS TO COORDINATE CONC, FOUNDATION AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS, 100'-0" HIGH MONOPOLE BY " ENGINEERED ENDEAVORS INCORPORATED" CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO MANUFACTURERS CONSTRUCTION DWGS ANn SPECIFICATIONS FOR EXACT SIZE AND TYPE, SEE NOTE BELOW, i ~t ' . .:",.;'.::"'d..>:;~.....;:4- " TAX LOT 41 REPUTED TO BE LAND FORMERLY OF KARCHER, NOW OR FORMERLY OF ft . o U Z = '" ~ :;;;::; o ~ y y z = F; d ~ e#':l Z o U N F; = $ o ~ d ~ ~ d ~ ~ F; Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PART 111- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PROPOSED BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE PUBLIC UTILITY CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY 24850 MAIN ROAD HAMLET OF ORIENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Prepared for: Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Prepared by: Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. 368 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, New York 11725 (516) 499-2222 June, 1997 rn~UDUrn >>i 2 3 1997 . , SOUTHOlO TOWN __.J PlANNING BOARD . PART III - LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PROPOSED BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE PUBLIC UTILITY CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY PROJECT LOCATION: 24850 Main Road Orient, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York . APPLICANT: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile c/o Pacbman, Pacbman & Brown 366 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, New York 11725 Contact: Howard Pacbman, Esq. (516) 543-2200 LEAD AGENCY: Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Contact: Valerie Scopaz . (516) 765-1938 PREPARER & CONTACT: This Part m Environmental Assessment Form was prepared by: Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. 368 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, New York 11725 Contact: Theresa Elkowitz (516) 499-2222 DATE OF PREPARATION: June, 1997 . PART III - LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PROPOSED BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE PUBLIC UTILITY CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY Table of Contents . ~ Introduction ...................................... 1 Project Purpose and Need .................... . . . . . . . .. 3 Potential Land Use Conflicts ........................... 8 Visual Impacts ................................... 10 Cumulative Impacts ................................ 13 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 18 Figure 1 - Site Location Map ........................ 2 Appendix A - Correspondence from Nelson, Pope & Voorhis and Town of Southold Planning Board Resolution Appendix B - Excerpts of Testimony before the Town of Southo1d Board of Appeals Appendix C - Photographs Appendix D - Simulations of Proposed Monopole Appendix E - Simulations of Silo and Bell Tower Appendix F - Response to Freedom of Information Request . PART m - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (EAF) PROPOSED BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE (BANM) PUBLIC UTILITY CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY 24850 MAIN ROAD HAMLET OF ORIENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK . Introduction This document is a Part ill - Environmental Assessment Form (part ill - EAF) prepared to evaluate the potential environmenta1 impacts associated with the proposed construction of a cellular communications facility by Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile (BANM) at 24850 Main Road, hamlet of Orient, Town of Southold (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). The cellular communications facility consists of the erection of an 84 foot free-standing monopole and the construction of a 12 foot by 40 foot lInrn~nned equiplI}ent shelter. The overall property is 10.54 acres in size. However, BANM is proposing to lease 0.041 acres to accommodate the cellular communications facility. A 0.068 gravel access drive from Main Road to the 0.041 acre site is proposed as an easement area (it is not part of the property to be leased). -~ '~." " This Part ill - EAF has been prepared in response to inquiries and comments made by the Town of Southold Pl~nning Board through its consultant, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, which specifically relate to the following: · Project purpose and need; · Potential land use conflicts; · Visual impacts; and · Cumulative impacts. 1 .. . . IV Terry Pt ~THVIE"'p,f~ o .V,~WDIl ~ ~ 11907 '. Browns Pl ORIENT BEACH STATE PARk LONG 'r ,.;, PI- fiGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. ,.....v,_..__. ;.-;:~;.~~~~;;r,.:;.:,,"-' "--" -:-;;';.',~:<..;,;,..:.:,;...;;:.,,---., . See Appendix A for correspondence from Nelson, Pope & Voorhis and for the Town of Southold Planning Board resolution relating to the request for a Part m - EAF for this application. PrQject Purpose and Need The purpose and need for the proposed project was outlined in detail by BANM Radio Frequency Engineer, John Gaiso, during his extensive testimony before the Town of Southold Board of Appeals on January 16, 1997 and March 19, 1997 and through affidavits submitted by Mr. Gaiso (dated April 24, 1997) and by Philip K. Charalel, a BANM Radio Frequency Engineer (dated April 23, 1997). Excerpts of this testimony and copies of the referenced affidavits are contained in Appendix B. The following synopsis of the purpose and need for the project is a summary of this testimony and supporting affidavits with supplementary information. 1 New York SMSA Limited Partnership, d/b/a Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile (hereinafter "BANM"), is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the New York Public Service Commission (pSC) to provide cellular telephone service to subscribers throughout New York. The action proposed by BANM at 24850 Main Road, Hamlet of Orient, Town of Southold, New York is to erect a monopole and associated equipment shelter as part of its cellular communications network. This action is necessary for BANM to comply with its PSC mandate to "furnish and provide with respect to its businesses such instrumentalities and facilities as shall be adequate and in all respects just and reasonable" (Public Service Law ~91). Similarly, the FCC requires BANM to be legally, financially, technically and otherwise capable of providing reliable cellular service (47 CPR ~22.911 (1991)). With these regulatory requirements, BANM is required to f1ll gaps in coverage and improve service in the area aroul,ld the proposed monopole location. 1 As the need for the project and the site selection process is specialized and technical in nature, it is not possible for the summary section to be all-inclusive. Therefore, the technical information contained in the testimony and supporting affidavits prevails over the information summarized in this Part m - EAF. 3 . . The technology employed by BANM limits the location and type of site that will allow BANM to comply with its FCC and PSC mandates to provide quality cellular service. The subject site was chosen after a careful review of the area service gaps, complaints received from BANM customers, geography, topography and the ability to integrate the proposed cellular communications facility into its network of sites to provide seamless and continuous cellular coverage in the area. BANM has determined this site to be the best suited to meet the cellular communication needs of those individuals, private businesses and numerous public agencies (e.g., police, fire, ambulance) that BANM is obligated to serve in the area. Methodology for Site Selection and Determination of Monopole Height As explained during the testimony of John Gaiso before the Town of Southold Board of Appeals on January 16 and March 19, 1997 (see Appendix B), there is an existing gap in cellular coverage in and around the Orient search area based upon information assembled by BANM field personnel and a computer propagation model. In order to increase service levels in that vicinity, an additional cellular site was determined to be needed in th~ arc:;a. Once the initial search area was determined, BANM began to conduct field tests and engineering analyses to identify potential suitable locations for selection as a monopole site. During the field reconnaissance, it became evident that the vast majority of the search area was comprised of residential properties and agricultural land. As BANM is cognizant of the sensitivity of locating its equipment" (especially monopoles) on residential property, the search was targeted to the main thoroughfare in the area (Main Road). 4 . The Fire Department parcel was considered and detennined to be a feasible monopole location. First, it was determined that this site would be adequate for a monopole location as it would enable the existing service gap to be filled. Second, the site is not used for residential purposes and it already has communications antennas. BANM was willing to accommodate the communications needs of the Fire Department on the new BANM monopole. However, due to general community opposition the Fire Department was unwilling to provide BANM with a lease. . Thereafter, BANM conducted a radio frequency test at the subject property and it was determined that a monopole at this site, 84 feet in height, would satisfactorily address the service gap in the Orient area. In this case, BANM was able to negotiate with the property owner at 24850 Main Road. Thus, the subject site was selected as the proposed monopole location. BANM uses various tools to determine the appropriate height for its monopoles and antennae. A computer propagation model, real life data using the global positioning satellite (GPS) network and signal strength are evaluated. A computer propagation is then run to determine the height needed to address the coverage problem. This tool provides general guidance as to the height at which a radio frequency (RF) test must be performed. A field team is then sent to the area to perform a field test to confirm the results of the computer modeling. The actual RF test that is performed provides the data with regard to height. Specifically, the RF test provides real data overlaid on a map of the existing cellular network. Once the RF testing is completed and the topography of the area has been factored in, the computer propagation model is run to determine the effect on the network. The height is then selected based upon the requirements to enhance the quality of service and fill the service gap. Analyses conducted at the subject site at 24850 Main Road indicated that a monopole height of 84 feet was needed to provide the necessary coverage and to adequately fill the service gap. 5 . The selection of the subject site as a communications facility location and the determination of the specific height of the monopole are is succinctly summarized in the April 23, 1997 affidavit of Philip Charalel (see Appendix B), an excerpt of which follows: 9. The Orient Site [24850 Main Road] is ideally located to remedy the service deficiency in cellular coverage that exists in the Orient area. . 10. 11. 12. 13. The Orient Site is situated in the approximate center of the area where the service deficiency exists. This permits the best possible coverage with the shortest possible tower. My [philip Charalel's] analysis confirms [John] Gaiso's conclusion that the Orient Site will provide adequate coverage for the Orient area. Cellular users in that area using both standard car mounted units (typically operating at 3 watts) and users of low powered hand-held portable units will be able to maintain a stronger signal connection. -.. ~ . ,. As testified to by Gaiso, to ensure that the Orient site would be as [ sic] visually unobtrusive, Bell Atlantic performed computer simulations to identify the minimum tower height necessary to remedy the service deficiency. A height of 84 feet was determined to be the minimum necessary height. Lower elevations would not provide the required coverage. Cellular service zones are divided into grids of theoretically hexagonal geographic areas. The hexagon pattern, however, will be distorted and altered by topography such as hills and ridge lines, and is merely a theoretical tool used to [sic] computer modeling. 6 . 14. In order to maintain continuous coverage, a cell site must be able to "see" the mobile customer. If there is an obstruction, the radio signal will either bounce off, bounce back or be absorbed by the obstruction. Hills, trees, buildings and other objects all effect [sic] the way a signal travels. 15. These physical limitations in cellular technology effect [sic] the number and type of locations that quality to remedy a service deficiency. . 16. The coverage gap in the Orient area exists despite the operation of Bell Atlantic's site in the Village of Greenport. Bell Atlantic can not simply "turn up" the power on this site to provide coverage in Orient. Thus, limitations in technology, topography-and FCC regulations result in a finite number of alternative sites that may be considered possible candidates to remedy a service deficiency. . . 19. Based on the foregoing data and analysis, it is my [philip Charalel' s] professional opinion that (i) there exists a service deficiency in cellular coverage with [sic] the Orient area; (ii) the Orient Site is a location which will permit seamless cellular coverage to be achieved within the Orient area with the shortest possible antenna and; (iii) the effectiveness of the Orient Site is confirmed by both computer modeling and by actual drive tests. It should be noted that BANM originally applied for a 100 foot monopole at this location in anticipation of the future need for co-location at this site by other cellular carriers. Due to the objections to height, BANM modified its application such that the height of the monopole has been reduced to 84 feet to accommodate only BANM's service needs. It should be noted, however, that co-location (i.e., location of antennas and equipment of more than one cellular carrier on the same monopole and site) is the most effective way to address the number of monopoles to be developed in a community while fulfilling the PSC and FCC mandates for reliable cellular service. 7 . Potential Land Use Conflicts The Town's consultant, in its comment letter of April 22, 1997 (Appendix A) cited the potential for land use conflicts, as follows: . The rural character of the area should be considered a valuable resource, and ihe potential for land use conflicts and visual impacts is the primary concern associated with the proposed project. The proposed project will introduce a new land use which is incongruous with the existing rural quality of the area. Although the monopole and building can be partially screened, they would seriously detract from the pastoral character of the hamlet. The proposed project would allow continued agricultural use of most of the parcel, which would not be possible if the parcel were developed under existing zoning. However, the location of a large communications structure in the area will result in an inherent land use conflict, and this impact is expected to be significant. The height of the structure and use of the property should be considered in the context of appropriate land use and zoning the vicinity. First, it should be understood that the proposed cellular communications facility is not a prohibited use in the R-80 zoning district in which the subject property is situated. In fact, the use is permitted by special exception of the Board of Appeals. Southold Town Code Section 100- 31(B)(6) states: Uses Permitted by Special Exception by the Board of Appeals. Public utility rights-of-way and as well as structures and other installations necessary to serve areas within the Town, subject to such conditions as the Board of Appeals may impose in order to protect and promote the health, safety, appearance and general welfare of the community and the character of the neighborhood in which the proposed structure is to be constructed. 8 . It has been demonstrated through testimony before and exhibits submitted to the Town that Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile is a public utility. As such, the proposed monopole and equipment shelter are permitted by special exception of the Board of Appeals subject to conditions imposed by that Board. Thus, by virtue of the above, the public utility structure has been determined by the Town of Southold to be compatible with and not in conflict with the zoning of the subject property . . With regard to land use, it is true that the communications facility is proposed to be situated on a former agricultural field. However, the proposed monopole presents no more of a land use conflict that the existing utility poles and lines. In fact, as it is one pole with a small equipment shelter, its land use impact is less significant than that caused by the numerous utility poles found along Main Road and many other roads in the Town. Appendix C contains photographs that substantiate this position. In Photograph No. I, looking easterly along Main Road, approximately 900 feet from the proposed monopole site, utility lines are present and clearly visible along both sides of the roalJ.way. Photograph Nos. 8 through 10 were taken from various vantage points looking toward the subject property. These photographs indicate the prevalence of existing utility poles, lines and transformers on both sides of Main Road in the vicinity of the subject property. These public utility structures traverse the frontage of residential and agricultural properties on and proximate to the subject site. Photograph Nos. 2 through 7 depict an existing ATT (Metro One) monopole on Elijah's Lane in Mattituck amongst other utility poles and lines and vegetation. It is clear from these photographs that the monopole is not causing a significant adverse visual impact. In fact, from the majority of vantage points, the monopole is no more distinctive that other utility poles and it tends to "blend" with other obstructions in the horizon. These photographs also confirm that the monopole becomes less visible in the horizon as distance therefrom increases. Furthermore, when trees and/or manmade structures are present in the line-of-sight, even if the trees/structures are not nearly as tall as the monopole, the view of the monopole is obstructed. 9 . Thus, from a land use perspective, the proposed public utility monopole is no more incongruous with the character of the area than the plethora of existing utility poles lining Main Road. It is also noteworthy that while the BANM monopole may be taller than the existing utility poles and is proposed at the interior of a property, it is one pole - not a series of numerous poles with lines attached thereto. . In summary, the proposed public utility monopole and equipment shelter is not expected to result in a significant land use or zoning conflict with existing uses in the area. Visual Impacts The Town consultant has commented that the "visual impacts of the proposed project are also likely to be significant, although partial mitigation could be employed. " As indicated in the above section of this Part m- EM. entitl.~ Potential Land Use Conflicts, based upon review of an existing ATT monopole in Mattituck and a thorough review of the character of the area of the proposed monopole and equipment shelter, the visual impacts are not expected to be significant or widespread. The horizon proximate to the propo~ed monopole location is not "pristine." As stated above, utility poles, transformers and overhead lines are present along Main Road and in the surrOll11ding area. Furthermore, the major transient view corridor in the vicinity of the proposed monopole site, Main Road, is lined in segments with mature trees that would serve as visual buffers to the proposed monopole when approaching the area from the east and west. As evidenced through evaluation of the existing Art monopole in Mattituck, the monopole is less visible in the horizon as distance therefrom increases; and the monopole blends with existing obstructions in the horizon. In fact, due to its gray !blue color, it is often less evident that typical utility poles. 10 . In an effort to photorealistically depict the proposed monopole on the subject site from those areas with the potential for the greatest visual impacts, BANM retained Creative Visuals, Inc. to prepare computer simulations in the immediate vicinity of the site, as follows: · View Point No. I - From the north side of Main Road, 590 feet east of Platt Road looking to the southwest; . . View Point No.2 - From the west side of Platt Road, 526 feet from Main Road, looking to the east-southeast. Analog photographs of the site from each of the above view points were taken. These photographs also presented reference points for the calculation of the monopole's placement utilizing a red cone and a flag asa benchmark situated at the site of the proposed monopole as seen from each view point. The photographs were scanned and digitized as high resolution files. The site and each view point were then located on a digitized USGS contour map. AutoCad was used to create a model of the proposed monopole using dimensions an~.drawings furnished by BANM and Engineered Endeavors, Inc., the communications facility manufacturer. Separate three-dimensional software, 3D Studio, was then used to photorealistically render the monopole as seen from each of the viewpoints. The communications facility was assigned "photorealistic" materials depicting ~e exact colors and dimensions in the software's materials editor wherein a photograph of an existing similar monopole supplied by the manufacturer was used to facilitate this process. Other software (Imagine Sun) simulated sunlight on the structure taking into account site latitude, date and time of day of the view point photographs. Finally, the photorealistically rendered monopole was inserted into the digitized site photographs to produce computer simulated photographs of the subject property with the proposed monopole. 11 . . The computer simulations from each of the above view points as well as a detailed methodology are provided in Appendix D. Review of these simulations indicates that the monopole would be visible from the north side of Main Road immediately across from the subject property along with the existing utility poles and overhead lines. However, the utility pole (right of the simulation of View Point No.1) is as evident as the monopole. The monopole would also be visible from View Point No.2 along Platt Road, but it would not substantially affect the rural character' of the area. It should also be noted that BANM is willing to relocate the ten-to-twelve foot shrubs on the property (former nursery stock) around the monopole and equipment shelter. As necessary, supplemental landscaping will also be planted. This vegetation will help to minimize potential visual impacts. While the visual analyses conducted have determined that the erection of the proposed public utility monopole would not result in significant, widespread adverse impacts, BANM is sensitive to the concerns of the communities that it serves. Therefore, if desired by the Town of Southold, BANM is willing to construct a communications facility in the form of a silo or bell tower. Computer simulations of the silo and bell tower from the above view points, prepared by Creative Visuals, Inc., are included in Appendix E. These options, while much more costly than the standard monopole, are offered to the Town as mitigation by BANM if so desired. 12 . Cumulative ImpacL~ The Town of Southold has requested an assessment of the cumulative impacts of the proposed project based upon the following comments from the Town's consultant (see Appendix A): . Approval of the proposed project will set a precedent for approval of other tower sites within the Town. Without proper planning, this would result in a significant intrusion on the rural nature of the community. The proposed project should be considered in the context of an overall plan for the siting of communication structures so as to minimize potential impacts on land use and visual resources. If the Town Board agrees to allow these structures within the Town, their locations should be carefully chosen to minimize the number oftowers and identify the optimal sites. The current application should not be considered without investigation of the cumulative impacts of the proposed action. There are several representations made in the above commentary that require direct response prior to the actual cumulative impact analysis. First, the assertion that the approval of this application would be precedent setting is not accurate. A windshield survey and a response to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request filed by the Counsel to BANM indicates that there are several other communications facilities situated in the unincorporated area of the Town of Southold (see Appendix F for FOI response). 13 ,---,-:-.~~~-"->'" -..,.:....-.... . . SEQR TOWER LOCATION HEIGHT DETERMINATION BANM 21855 CR 48, 100 feet Unlisted; Negative Cutchogue Declaration ATT 53095 Main 125 feet No SEQR Documentation Road/165 Provided Peconic Lane, Southold ATT/ 415 Elijah's 100 feet Unlisted; Negative Metro One Lane, Mattituck Declaration New York 31775 Main 85 feet Unlisted; Negative Telephone Road, Declaration Cutchogue It is noteworthy that all of the above communications structures are higher than that being proposed by BANM. Furthermore, all were classified as Unlisted actions in accordance with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and received Negative Declarations. Based upon the response to the FOr request received from the Town of Southold, none of the above applicants were required to prepare Part ill - EAFs for their applications. Second, with regard to the comment that the proposed monopole would affect the rural character of the area, it is erroneous to claim that this one pole would result in a "significant intrusion on the rural nature of the community."' As indicated above, there are at least four other existing communications facilities in ~e Town. In addition, there are numerous existing utility poles and lines that are prevalent throughout the Town. To claim that this one communications pole would be a significant intrusion on the community is not substantiated especially given the analyses of land use and visual resources contained in this Part ill - EAF. 14 :>,-~"X',~';_-'_ . . The Town's consultant also states that "Ifthe Town Board agrees to allow these structures within the Town, their locations should be carefully chosen to minimize the number of towers and identify the optimal sites." This comment is also not appropriate. As explained in the section of this Part ill - EAF entitled, Potential Land Use Conflicts, the Town Board in the Southold Town Code specifies public utility structures as permitted in the R-80 district by special exception of the Board of Appeals. Thus, the Town Board has expressly agreed to allow such structures within the Town subject to the applicant's compliance with conditions that may be imposed by the Board of Appeals as part of a special exception application process. Reference is also made in the consultant's comments to the locations of these structures being carefully chosen by the Town to minimize their number and identify optimal sites. As described in the section of this Part ill - EAF entitled Project Purpose and Need and in Appendix A, the selection of optimal communications facility sites are dictated by service gaps, capacity issues, geography, topography, etc. It is a highly specialized and technical process performed by public utility providers of cellular service. Furthermore, the need for cellular communications sites in particular areas change over time based upon the number of cellular users. Although the Town's consultant may recommend the limitation of eligible areas for the placement of such structures based upon planning and environmental considerations, such action is not appropriate given the PSC and FCC mandates to cellular service providers regarding the provision of reliable service. From a SEQR perspective, however, a lead agency can and should consider the cumulative impacts of actions within its jurisdiction. Because of the nature of this action, a cumulative impact analysis for a cellular communications facility would focus on several environmental issues, as follows: · Public health; · Land use; and · Visual resources. 15 Communities often raise health concerns associated with the environmental effects of radio frequency (RF) emissions. This issue was extensively reviewed by the Federal government as part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (hereinafter, the "Act"). The Act is the applicable Federal law with regard to the consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of cellular communications facilities. Section 704 of the Act states that: No State or local Government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the [Federal Communications] Commission's regulations concerning such emissions. BANM has submitted both expert testimony and supporting documentation on January 16, 1997 to the Board of Appeals indicating that its communications facilities comply with FCC regulations regarding radio frequency emissions. Thus, from the s~dpoint of cumulative environmental health effects, the Town of Southold is preempted by federal law from regulating cellular communications facility siting on this basis. The Town can consider cumulative land use and visual impacts when reviewing applications for cellular communications facilities. However, as indicated in the Potential Land Use Conflicts and Visual Impacts sections of this Part ill - EAF, the land area affected by the placement of a monopole is minirna1. Furthermore, the Town has other monopoles situated within its boundaries that have not been identified as causing significant adverse land use impacts. 16 . With regard to visual impacts, utility poles and lines (land line telephone and electricity) are prevalent throughout the Town and run in series along roadways. Monopoles are single poles placed in individual areas and, as evidenced by the existing monopoles in the Town, do not result in widespread or significant adverse visual impacts. Thus, from a visual perspective, it is more appropriate to review the visual impact of individual monopoles in the particular area in which they are proposed as opposed to considering cumulative impacts on the Town. . In conclusion, the cumulative environmental effects of the placement of cellular communications facilities are not significant. It should be noted, however, that the most effective means to address the number of cellular communications facilities in a particular area is to encourage co-location (Le., location of antennas and equipment of more than one cellular carrier on the same monopole and site) where there are facilities that could be used to fill a particular user's service gap. However, such co-location must be at a site that would enable the cellular provider to fulfill its PSC and FCC mandates for reliable cellular service. 17 BIBLIOGRAPHY Charalel, Philip. Affidavit of April 23, 1997 Creative Visuals, Inc. Visual Analysis, Proposed Public Utility Structure, Orient, NY. May, 1997. Gaiso, John. Affidavit of April 24, 1997. Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, Correspondence of April 22, 1997. Scopaz, Valerie. Memorandum of May 27, 1997. Southold, Town of. Town Code. Southold, Town of. Excerpts of Transcripts of the Board of Appeals dated January 16, 1997 and March 19, 1997. Telecommunications Act of 1996. 18 APPENDIX A FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 1..1'_. 1_, ',I, ';.,11 1""..111'1,:1 1"1 11!ll!, i j:!-.U.HI. I ',~ ",.j,_."I'1 1 "I" ~.!l.l_, I~l;.. ..:.. v-- ~ NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC .~VIA()"'''''.W''AI.. . ClL..........,.,.(: . I;:"'Nc:tU;"~INO CHMI\.~S oJ, VQQil'1'S, CEP. "'CP . ,\QT,",UI'f J,I(Q!jIlBEA. P:~ . "'I~CE'-lr G. DONNELLY. P:E . VICTOR 61iF.I iI.€. . JOiEP" ~,(II~rA"'I.l.IH... ~OIl,€RT t::,NEt.SON. JA. ".k. . CI'UUSTOPl'1e.l'I IV, "OOlN:KJ"t....e. April 22, 1997 Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Southold Planning Board T cwn IWI, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 -....'.\_-- ; '.'~'i.:1 ~~ j _oJ ~'.7 .] :. . G'" '. . Re: Review of EM Bell Atlandc Special Use Permit for Public Utility Structure SCfM No. 1000-013-6-5 Dear Mr. Ward: As per your request, we have completed a preliminary review of tile above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as folloW!!: J. Review PartJ LEAF The parcel bas been field inspected by NP&V,.and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of sam\: is ateached. 2. Prepare Part D LEAF The Part n LEAF checklist bas been completed and is also attached. AdditioIULl infol1lllltion concerning our findings is included below. J. Environmental alld Plantring Considerations The parcel has been inipected'and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted The site consists of 10.54 acres ofJand in the hamlet ofOnent in the Town of Soutllold. The subject site is loc.a.ted south orNYS Roule 25 appro.>cimately 375 east of Platt Road and has approximately 224 feet of frontage on NYS 25. The area of the sile is zoned Single Family Residential 80, which would permit residential 3Ubdivision of the site with a minimum lot size of 80,000 s.f. The proposed action involves an application for a special use permit to allow a public: utility suucture in order to construct a 100' monopole for a cellular telephone antenna. The pole would be approximately 2 feet in diameter. P:og. 1 :J7a WAl..T WHITf\itAN ,",CAe. MCl..VIL.Lfif, NY , ,')'47.e,ee '61 GO;) 4~~-eGIi56 ~A>< (~~ 81 427-sea.o ,'. .' '" 'ilL 'I' I. ,., """. , . llell AlIaotic Special Use Permit E.AF Ra"icw Appru.wnatcly 0.05 acres would be leased to the project sponsor, Bell AtlaJllic NYNEX Mobde, for the anterma and a 466 s.f. equipment shelter. A gr~"el foad '~ould be constructed for access to the antenna. and a cham link fence would be in:ltallc<! around the facility to protect Ule antenna flam vandalisl\l. The project site is lIat. oud there are no wetlands Or other significant landforms in the vicinity. The soils on site are entirely Hoven Loam, slopes 0-2 percent. 11ds llOil selies is suitable for development, with good leaching potential. Although Haven soils with shallow slopes are not cla3sified within groups 1-4 of the NYS Agricultura.i Land Classification System, they are fertile agncultural soils which warrant preservation. - The ele\'ation of groundwater beneath the site is approximately 2 feet above mean sea level (ms!) according to the 1992 SCDHS map, and the topographic elevation is approximately 19 feet above msl Thus. the depth to groundwater is approximately 17 feet below the surface. The proposed project will not require sanitary facilitieE, and the only impervious sumce will be the roof of me ptOposed sheiter. Thus, th~ impact on groundwater resources is expeL'ted to be negligible. The depth to f5!oundwater is sufficient for residential developmerrt, and development under the existing R-SO zoning would be expected to result in only minimallmpacts. The subject site is located within the Water Budget Area as mapped by the Suffolk County Department ofHeaith Service:i (SCDHS). The Water Budget Area includes those locations where there is sufficient groundwater to develop large public water supply wells. The subject site is also located in SCDHS Groundwater Managemcnt lone IV, which covers the North Fork and portions of the South Fork. According to the North Fork Water Supply Plan (ERM- Northeast, Camp Dresser & McKee, 1983), the subject site is in an area significantly impacted by aldica.rb (concentrations over 7 u&,\). III addition, nitrate contamination (concentrations over 8 ugil) is present in an area to the east of the site. The entire site is abandoned agricultural land. F z.lIow field occupies most ofthe site, although there is an area of overgrown nursery stock to the south. The proposed structure will be located in the northern portion of the site oeilr NYS 25. although II. 300 foot ~etback from the road has been employed to allow a.120 foot radius in the event that the antenna were to fall. The project area is vegetated almost exclusively by ragweed, with a limited number of otller old field species. The nursery stock to the south ;s predominantly evcrgreeulrees and shrubs, includi.ng juniper and cedar. and black pine. Baybeny and other deciduous shrubs and trees arc also pre.ent. The proposed project will occupy only II. 'small area of the site, and the remaining land could either be allowed to undergo succession or be returned to an active farming use. The ccologkal impDcts ofthe proposed project will be minimal afier project con'truction. The Land use in the vicinity or the site is predominantly agricultural, with a mile of residential development and a few small scale commercial properties along the NYS 2S corridor. Tlte rural .II&V NEJ..,SON. POP!;; oS: ',JQa~ls. LLC 1i!'lVI~A.L . ~'''''INc; . r.::ON':iU\..~ FDge 1 IL'-J, ;1..,1, IILIII,. III ,11'_' ,1111,' ." Utul'J,I. I 01' 1'___ I ILl. _"._'_ ,,'~_, I (J('11 Atl:loiic Special U;c I'l!nnit EAl' Review chanl<;ter of the area should be coo.sidercd a Vllluaille resource, llnd the potential for land use conflicts :inG visual impa"1s is the primary ccncel'rl 3SS0Cl:lted with the propvsed project. The proposed project will introduce a new land use which is in(;ongntou9 ",ith the existing rural quality of the arell. Although the monopole and t>uildiJlg can be pal tiaUy screened, they would seriously detract from the pastoral character onhe hamlet. The proposed project would allow continued agticultural use of most of the parcel, wbich would not be possible if the parcel were developed under existing ;;:oning. However. the location of a large communication struCture in tbe area ....ill result in an inherent land use wnilict.. Ilml this impact is expecled to be sigr.i.fieam The beight of Ihe structure and IlSC of the property should be considered in the context of appropriate land use and zoning in the vicinity. The visual impacts of We proposed .project are also likely to b.: significant, although panial mitigalion could be employed. The propos'ld sn"L!clure will be apparent ITem both NYS 25 alld from local residences along PiaU Road. The subjl';ct sile is clearly viciblc from the surro<1nding arl)ll due 10 Ihe adjacent agricultural uses and 14Ck of \'egetation along NYS 25. and the open vistll$ MrosS the agric:ultural fields contribute to the rural quality of the area. The existing nursery stock will help scr<<n views from the south, but the 100' pole will be viSIble. Lighting of the structure way also be employed, which "ill intrude on the character of the area during the nighttime hours. These impacts can be partially mitigated wough the use of la..dscaping 10 provide screening. At a minimum, the proposed shed and fence;! area should be screened with new plantiugs. Additional street plantings could also be utilized along NYS 25 to belp soften views of the proposed monopole. The proposed setback of 300 feet is great enough that a 20 foot tree would block views of the proposed mooopole from NYS 25. It is recorlunended thet deciduous trees and shrubs be used along the roadway. Although evergreens would provide more complete screening, tlley ",auld be incoll!listent with the existiug streetscape along NYS 25, and the monopole would not dominale views if observed through a hedgerow of deciduous trees and shrubs. Similar plantings could be utilized along the western border of the site to screen views from Platt Road, although the existing homes offer some mitigation. Views aCTOSS the fields from the south and east ",ill be more di.~taDt, b..t the pole would still be visible if no mitigation is employed. Although the visual inlnlsion of the proposed pole might be mitigated by new p1autings, such landscaping would also eliminate the existing agricultural vistas from NYS 25 and Platt Road. Maintenance oftbese vistas is important in protecting the rural nature ofthe hamlet, and thU9 Ihe visual impacts of the proposed project should be consIdered significant. No traffic impacts are expected as a result of the proposed project, as on going maintenance will require only two trips per month. There may be a slight impact on local traffic during construction. lIupacts on community services such as police, fire lInd scbool distncts should also be minimal. There will be a negligible tax increase to provide services, and no increase in demand for services is expected. The stru~'ture will be fenced 10 minimize the pOlential for vandalism or trespassing by young people. IIP&V NELSON. ~pt; {;; VOOFU-4IG, LLC ~Al... . ~ . COl'GLlLTlMG Page .3 I ...... , "',.' 1111 'j 4 . 11'._.' HIli. .... L..".'_"'" I. I -','..'-' "U. ..,,-,_. : 8ell AU""lic Special U", Perlllit EM Review In addition to these site specific impacts of tile proposed project, the cwn.uative impacts of the propo!!oed project must be considered, Approval of the proposed project will set II precedent for approval of other tower sites within the Town. Without proper planning, tins would result in a significant intrusion on the rural nature of the commurlity, The proposed project should be considered in the context of an overall plan for the siting of commurication struCtUres so as to minimize potential impacts on land use and visual resources. If the Town Board &g1ees'to allow these structw-es within the Towa, their locations should be carefully chosen to minimize the nwnber oftowers and identify the optimal sites, The current application should not be considered -without investigation of the cumul.ative impacts of the proposed project. . . . . In summary, the primary concerns related to the proposed project a(e the potential for land use conflicts Illld visual impacts. In addition, there a(e potential cumulative impacts on siting of towers in other parts of the Town. The visual impactS can be partially mitigated by screening of the proposed structUre with plantings along the northern and western boundaries of the site, but the inherent land use cont1ict would not be mitigated by these measw-es and the existing agricultural vista would be lost. Some impacts would be greater under existing single family zonina. including greater disruption of the nmve soils and vegetation on site, as well and discharge of sanitary flow to groundwater, Single family subdivision would also result in a permanent use which precludes aericu1ture on the site. Ongoing agricultural use will be possible under the proposed project, and the site could be returned to fuU agricultural use if the lellSe were discontinued in the future. Single family developmerifwould also result in slightly greater traffic impacts, as well as a greater demand for community services. While some ofthese impacts might be locally significant ifumnlligated, construction of four tolille new homes would not be expected to result in significant cumulative impacts and land use cont1ict issues would not occur, as tile land Is zoned for residential use. Th~ board may'JVish to require a Long Environmental Assessment Form. pa(\ 3 Narrative and Analysis which addresses the potential land use conflicts, visual Intrusion and cumulative impa<-1s of the proposed project. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to ca1l. les. oorhis, CEP, AlCP Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC enc; Long EAF Parts I 8r. n .II&V Ne...SCN. ~cpe & YOQFU-lIS, LLC ~AI... . ~ . c::c;NSuLTlI'G Page 4 . APPENDIX B FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. . - TRANSCRIPT EXCERPTS BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 1997 Page 9 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals Mr. Falasco: There were no studies done on any of the other streets. There'll be no need, in my opinion for that one car that does come once every three or four weeks to go down any of the residential areas to get to the site. Chairman: OK. Mr. Pachman? M Pachman: Yes, then Mr. Chairman I would like to ask Mr. Gazzo, the radio frequency engineer to come up. Chairman: Oh. I apologize. I didn't go down the entire Board with Mr. Falasco. I apologize. No. We'll just wait until the end. L. Tortora: I'm willing to wait till the end if you are. J. Dinizio: Well I'd just like to ask this gentleman a question You said the top of the tower is going to have a lOxlOxlO' triangle on the top, antennas coming down. I'm assuming they're not going to be over 84'. That's not going to make any noise? Mr. Falasco: Those towers? We haven't experienced any noise from them. / Chairman: Are you referring to drone or something of that nature? J Dinizio: Yeah. More specifically, a drone.,Yes. Wind howling through the tower? Mr. Falasco: I haven't experienced anything, at our other sites. Chairman: OK. Thank you. Mr. Pachman I'm sorry. M. Pachman: We'd ask Mr. Gazzo with the Board's permission to come up. Mr. Gazzo you are the. radio frequency engineer employed at Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile is that correct? Mr. Gazzo: Yes. M. Pachman: Would you please give us a brief description of your background and training? Mr. Gazzo: I graduated with a bachelors in electrical engineering from Polytechnic University located in Farmingdale NY. I just recently graduated again from Polytechnic University with a masters. I've been in the radio frequency business for about the last seven years, I've been employed by Bell Atlantic Mobile for the last six years as a radio frequency engineer. M. Pachman: Very good. Now Mr. Gazzo can you please tell us have you been previously qualified as an expert in radio frequency matters by various towns and villages in Nassau and Suffolk County. Is that correct? . Page 10 - Transcl'ipt of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals Mr. Gazzo: Yes I have. M Pachman: Would you please explain to Board how a cell telephone system works from an engineering standpoint? Mr. Gazzo: Sure. Well very briefly, if you look at the use of things in the room. We have three microphones that appear on the desk. If each of these represents one of our cell sites we'll go through basically how the system works. If you were to start at this end of the Board table and initiate a call, the way the call is initiated is as follows: You dial a number, you will press send and that call will go up onto the cell site the call will be routed back to a switching office and from that point there we will determine whether that call should go to a land line office or to another mobile telephone or even out to somewhere else in the world. As you begin to drive, because it is cellular and it's a mobile environment you're going to go from one cell site to the next cell site. Somewhere along the point both cell sites are constantly communicating back and forth with the phone and with our computer network back at Orangeburg. When you get to point where the service level diminishes to point where we feel the call quality isn't where we need it to be we will begin a hand off procedure. And that procedure basically says the.- next site is located coming up, please tune to these channels in the phone, automatically without you knowing in under a second will tune to the next cell site. And the whole process starts over again. When you press end it basically tears down the call and your call is completed. The way we accomplish this is through radio frequency and we are given by the FCC radio frequencies which we re-use through the network. This is akin to what happens basically with radio stations toq.ay. If you drive across the country you'll notice that your radio stations change every once in a while, and that again is the re-use of frequencies. We obviously do it in a much smaller area and 'we do it more precisely because our frequencies are higher. And basically that's how the system does work. M Pachman: Can you please tell us Bel. Atlantic NYNEX Mobile as part of its' FCC license has been granted a specific band on which it can operate. Will you please discuss this. with the Board. Mr. Gazzo: Around 1984, some channels that were used for what was currently very high frequency television; this was the dial on your TV that most people tuned to view and got mostly snow, well in that band there was a group of frequencies that was not really suited for that type of use, which is broadcast television. At that point the FCC reallocated those frequencies across the country to two cellular providers in each geographic area. At that point we were NYNEX Mobile Communications, we received a license from the FCC which allowed us to use those frequencies throughout the NY Metro area. By receiving the license we were guaranteed that we are the only users of the frequencies in that band, therefore we do not interfere with anyone else and we also are not interfered by other people. Because, again it's our band solely. . . Page 11 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals M Pachman: Now have you determined that there is service deficiency along Main Road in the search area? Mr. Gazzo: Yes. M Pachman: Could you please us how you determined there was such a service deficiency? Mr. Gazzo: Well what you'll notice is crackling, you'll notice a degradation in the call quality. The standard we hold ourselves to is the standard of land line quality, which is similar to you picking up the phone in your house when it operates normally and you hear a crisp clean conversation from both parties. In order to do that there has to be certain area between the noise level which is the ambient noise level that exists in the environment and our signal level. For us to be able to do this we need to strategically place cell sites in our cellular geographic area. We've noticed that in this area that level has deteriorated. That is basically due to the population of other cell sites which creates some interference and also that we don't have a cell site in the area and mainly because the customer and what they're using today is a much smaller phone, lower power. So one of the main things you are going to/ see there is a deterioration in your call quality'. We also have a problem with Connecticut service. And basically what happens is their signal is stronger in that environment than our signal and we can't have that, we have to correct that situation. Which is mandated by the FCC. M. Pachman: Is it true Mr. Gazzo that as part of the FCC license a company is mandated to provide a certain level of service? And that service should be what is called seamless service. Mr. Gazzo: Correct. Seamless in quality service is part of the requirements of holding a license and that basically is judged by our customers and our customers, do complain about the service in this area. M. Pachman: Now did you, will the site which is proposed help remedy the service deficiency in this area? Mr. Gazzo: Yes it will. M. Pachman: And you've been referring to a computer propagation map labeled existing cellular coverage. I've handed up a copy to the Board and ask that that be put in evidence. Will you please describe what this shows? Mr. Gazzo: Basically what we have here is the North Fork of L.I. and this shows our existing cellular coverage. The current map you have, the hand in map, is basically the same thing just a smaller version. I've pointed out the existing sites and the proposed site. And as you can see the blue represents what we call quality service. Now there are several other gaps in the area but what you need to understand about this map Page 12 - Trflllscript of NYNEX Hear'ing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals is it's a computer generated model and what it says is basically it's a switch, either the service is there or it is not there. And if you set a certain threshold mark it may turn off in a certain area. This is only a representation of the service it's gives a good representation of the service and these are also some of the areas we are looking at to place a cell site. What we do to also back this up to really get a good feel of what is happening is again we have field personnel who are c(mstantly driving the arel,l in their effort to service the site and also in our effort we constantly drive the area to determine the level of service. And that's what we're judged by for internal reasons. We've also noted based upon that information that there is lack of coverage in this area. I've also sent people from our organization to drive the area with equipment. Basically what we do is. we use the current GPS network which is a satellite network constantly orbiting around the world. We tie that into our vehicle which gives us a location on a map. Then our vehicle has receivers tuned to a specific frequency within site of our van which is a test frequency. We generate a test signal and we see where we see the test signal and where we don't. And then we turn the test signal off and we do what is called an ambient coverage of the area or existing cellular. And then we overlay that over the map. And this basically represents that information also. / Chairman: Before we finish this with this gentleman, we have to give the audience a chance to look at this map, OK. All the people squinting and having a hard time just give us a couple of minutes here and we'll let you look at this and then we can deal with _.That one isn't really as good as the one they have right there. L Tortora: I'm having a problem with this map because it really doesn't coincide with the map you've submitted as far as your seamless service areas. Mr. Gazzo: This is proposed coverage; that would be the second map. L Tortora: We were looking at this one, there's another at the end. Mr. Gazzo: One is a before and the other is an after. One is existing the other is put forward, should the site _' Chairman: This one (eXhibit) is the deficiency. Mr. Gazzo: Correct it shows the gaps. B Villa: This is the current though? M Pachman: Yeah, this is what's happening according to the computer propagation. Maybe if we can flip that up for members of the Board and for the audience when they have an opportunity to see it. If and when the site is up and operating what the computer propagation, computer generation will show as to the coverage. . Page 13 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 1 G, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals Chairman: OK M Pachman: Will you please explain Mr. Gazzo what we are looking at. - - Mr. Gazzo: Sure. Right now you see that there I've turned on several other possible sites in and around the area and one of those being the proposed Orient site and you see that it covers the area we're having a problem with. L Tortora: OK Cause it wasn't identified here and I said wait. Not the same maps. Mr. Gazzo: On the key on the side of map what you'll see is the first key is titled existing cellular coverage and the key on the other map is titled proposed cellular coverage. Let me make sure that's correct. Proposed cellular coverage. L Tortora: Because we don't have the other one down here. Mr. Gazzo: The other one says existing cellular coverage. / Chairman: What's the question Bob? B. Villa: My question is, and I profess not to know much about this, but we were asked to get a tower in Cutchogue which you did get, why have you got an area where you have poor service right in the middle of Cutchogue? Mr. Gazzo: OK And I'll explain how it works again. Understand something first of all about the propagation; it's a 0 or 1. So by setting the bar it could be on or off. The service area you are talking about is probably about maybe a mile along, along 25A. As the terrain changes and as the cells propagate the propagation dies off naturally. That's just the way it is. And we also have to keep the propagation at a certain level so it doesn't interfere our other cell sites. Thirdly, the site is made up of three different sectors. There's a sector faced 102 degrees east of true North, there's a 220 degrees east of true north and a third sector at 342 degrees. Sometimes when you appear in the no you're going to get what's called an area of no service because you are in the no of all the sectors. And we try to overlap that but sometimes we're not able to do that. So we have to put in other sites to do that. B Villa: So what you're saying is we're looking at a proliferation of these things because you're always going to have blind spots? Mr. Gazzo: Well the way we determine and that goes into how and why we put up sites. And there's a whole list of criteria. One of the biggest criteria is that our customers complain and that we have a significant enough problem to spend a significant amount of money to fix it. Again this doesn't necessarily mean that this is a bad area. What it means is . Page 14 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing .January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals that the level of service we're looking for is currently not met in that area. And it's currently not met over a small part of the area. L Tortora: How many customers do you serve in the area that you are proposing to create the cell site? Mr. Gazzo: Well there's two issues with that, I don't hl1ve that information and that's, I can tell you how many customers we have, over a million customers, but how many customers we serve in specific area I don't have. . L Tortora: I'm trying to get some idea of the extent of the complaints and the magnitude of this problem. Mr. Gazzo: A sufficient enough amount of complaints that a) It has been brought to the engineering departments attention by our customer service organization b) It has also been flagged on our, every time we re-evaluate the network and we do a scan of the network and we see the current level and each year we adjust the level we need to provide to our customers based on the teclmo10gy and the amount of customers. that that is also flagged with a problem and thirdly the predominate problem on the / North Fork of Long Island is the proliferation of the competitor on the other side of the water into this area. L Tortora: Let me get into this a little bit. Chairman: Hold the question, we'll be right with you. Gerry Woodhouse: Just a definition. When you're talking about customer I'm clear what you're talking about. Are you talking about customers who live in that area or are you talking about customers who might be driving on 25 and need to be using the phone. I'm just not clear on that. Chairman: Do you want them to address that? L Tortora: Yes and then I'd like to ask a question. Mr. Gazzo: It's both. L Tortora: As far as the competition in Connecticut. Explain to me exactly what happens. In other words when you get into one of these crackling areas what happens? Mr. Gazzo: OK If this room were to be dark and you were to stand at one end of the room and I were to stand at the other end of the room and I was to give you a light flashlight and I was to tell you hold this flashlight like that. Now the room is totally dark you have the only light source in the room and as you put that light on a certain amount of that light is going to travel across the room. The reason being there's nothing for it to interfere with. There's no barriers to block it there's no mountains there's no trees. There's nothing else there. Now the only way Page 15 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals to compensate because if I need to have my own light on my side of the room is for me to put up a light. And then if I put up a red light I'm going to see more red light than I'm going to see white light because the red light is closer to where I am. L Tortora: It has nothing to do with frequency and transmission.. Mr. Gazzo: Well basically light is a waive. - - L Tortora: So in other words you could have this problem whether you're living in Cutchogue or in Southold or anywhere. It's very similar to the fact that the people who live along Long Island Sound in Southold pick up Connecticut TV because there is nothing to interfere with it and because their transmission is much stronger because there's nothing to interfere with it. Is that very accurate? Mr. Gazzo: Exactly L Tortora: So at what point does this township of Southold in other words? In flipped over to Connecticut? competition come in? In the what specific area is it being / Mr. Gazzo: Probably in the Orient Point area you're going to see a lot of it. L Tortora: In no other areas? Mr. Gazzo: Oh. L Tortora: In no other areas of Southold? Mr. Gazzo: If you travel along the beach of Southold and you're an area that's a bluff that's behind one of our sites, and again you have a clear line of site to their sites over ours you're going to see that signal much clearer than ours. L Tortora: So the problem of the cellular quality service is not one that is unique and competition from Connecticut is clearly not one that is unique to this particular site. Mr. Gazzo: It's unique to the North Shore of Long Island and it's also unique to any time you border a system, especially your systems are boarded with a large body of water across them. L Tortora: Are you familiar with the new micro cell technology that require new types of towers and has NYNEX operated any of these systems in NY State? Mr. Gazzo: Yeah. I'm very familiar with micro cells. Micro cells is also a generic term. Basically what that generic term means is a smaller cell, thus when you talk about a micro cell you talk about a smaller cell that's . Page 16 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals going to serve less ctlstomers and it's predominately used in an urban environment because of the low powered nature of the cell and because of the way it's positioned. L Tortora: Do you have any of the micro cell systems operating in NY State. ... - Mr. Gazzo: Oh yes we do. L Tortora: Could you give us a list of the locations of those. Mr. Gazzo: They are in building type cells. Yes I don't have that list at hand right now but. L Tortora: Could you provide that information to the Board please. Mr. Gazzo: Sure L Tortora: Thank you. Chairman: Gentleman had a question right over here. / Ralph Peluso: I have a question regarding the cellular phone which I use quite often and live right where that proposed tower is going and I have no problems what so ever. Now if I'm using the cellular phone and I don't get, and I use NYNEX by the way,tlhd it goes out, I'll go into Rome. OK. Now when I go into Rome it's not NYNEX is that what's their problem, that they are loosing money cause my cellular phone is being transferred to someone else, in that area. Chairman: Who's able to answer that question? Mr. Gazzo: Again it's the perception of how you look at it. You're also paying an additional fee. R Peluso: I don't care. Mr. Gazzo: Well. R Peluso: You're the people who care it seems. L Tortora: Just address your question to the Chairman, OK please. R Peluso: He's looking at me, you know. Mr. Gazzo: To answer that question I can give an example only cause we can go back and forth. Basically we have customers who do care and are concerned about when they go to make a call that they're not making a call in the network they're contracted to make that call on. This becomes particularly important when you're trying to make a call to save someone's life. . Page 17 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals R Peluso: 911 goes through no matter what on the cellular phones. Chairman: OK I had two other questions. R Peluso: My background is an electrical contractor. Chairman: Hold on one second. Hold your questions ladies and gentlemen. R Peluso: I just tWnk that's a bogus answer. Mr. Gazzo: The problem with that is that when you're roaming on another carrier and you try to use some of the services that cellular provides you're going to be routed over to the Connecticut area. In the Connecticut area you're going to be teIling someone where you are located and what the problem is. There's a very good chance that they're not familiar with what's happening. Until you identify that you're on a cellular phone and you identify what county you're in. At that point wWchis probably about two to three minutes you are now going to routed back to Riverhead. R Peluso: Excuse me. I have an answer to that please. Usual1y when you go to Rome the operator 'wiII tel1 you you're in Rome, OK and if that phone cal1 is going through they already know I'm in Rome. OK Chairman: OK Is there anytWng else you'd like't6 say. / M Pachman: If I could just ask Mr Gazzo, How did you determine the height of tower? Mr Gazzo: By using all the tools we have available to us. Using both the propagation model the real life data model using GPS and also the signal strength we'l1 do several propagation models before we send a team out to do a test. Based upon those several propagation models we will se what the best height is and then we'l1 confirm that using actual data analysis. Chairman: We have a question from the lady. in the back. Ann Mc Since it's nine miles across the Sound, and we are transferring and picking up from Connecticut, then you're sending equipment, Orient's only three miles, so is it true then that if the power were located on Plum Island wWch would only be four miles away from us it would be equal1y effective? Mr. Gazzo: No. Again you go back to the quality of service and what we discussed about the flashlight and there is no interference. When and I don't know who I should direct my question to the audience or you. OK Again when you're talking about cellular you have to talk about a line of sight technology. And when you're standing on the shore of Connecticut you have to understand something about the way Connecticut was Page 18 - Tl'anscript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals developed. Connecticut is very industrialized on their shore. Their sites are very very high and very very powerful. And they see much farther than our sites, that's why some of their sites actual interfere into the Sag Harbor and E. Hampton area. They get that far across because they're so high they have less to interfere. And because they're powered up. Again if we put a site on Plum Island, again we're defeating our purpose because we're going to have to power the sites up so much that we're going to create interference back into our network, thus creating another mini SNET problem. What again, when you talk about micro cell technology and you talk about where the technology is going that really ties into what we're discussing here is that you need to place the site where the customers are, where the problem is so that you reduce the interference you give the level of service you need and only that level service. If you start to power it up and try to fix the problem from the outside in you're going to create a mass amount of interference in our network and that's just going to shuffle the problem all over the place. Chairman: OK Question from this gentleman here. Just state your name for the record please. John Rieger: Do you have an application before the FCC for this / instillation? M Pachman: The FCC has granted Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile a license to operate a cellular network. You don't apply each time for each site. It has a license, the license was just approved for 10 years. John Rieger: Have you notified the FCC that this might be environmentally sensitive? M Pachman: Well maybe we can into those questions with another witness who might be, ah. Chairman: Can you hold that question sir? J Rieger: Yes, thank you. J Dinizio: Can I ask a question? Chairman: Sure J Dinizio: I guess I have a couple of technical questions, one would be, I notice you have a tower in Greenport, Moore's La. And then you have one where, in Cutchogue, is the next one? Mr. Gazzo: Yes. J Dinizio: I suppose, can you give some information on the tower? Some type of level reading? Mr. Gazzo: That's proprietary to our network. Page 19 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southeld Town Board of Appeals J Dinizio: I suppose, but we're trying to make a decision here as to whether or not you need te have this to service your customers. So I'm wondering myself personally just if it's necessary or if you couldn't go to this micro cell technology because mestly your customers are going to be aleng that main road, and you could put mini cells, same as in the Linceln Tunnel same as Queens Midtown Tunnel along the main road and be much less obtrusive. And selve your problem and solve our problem, so I'm 1.00 king more for, I worked fer cablevision for 18 Years, and I sited towers. I've done seme. And if yeu're telling us that the infermatien that was sent te us frem Washingten was basically that yeu de have certain rights as a Public Utility, and I den't deny that, but I weuld like te be able te make an infermed decisien. I understand preprietary. Yeu can put it anywhere yeu want. Yeu can ge based te 1 te 10 and tell me where 10 weuld get yeu and where yeu are new. At 5 .or whatever. Mr. Gazze: I guess I can answer that questien a let better by just grvmg yeu a little mere infermatien. And I alse fall inte this sametimes tee when asked these questiens. Everyane facuses an the structure they are gaing ta see, which is the tawer. And everyane facuses an the existing tawers and .only what we call talks abaut the farward pattern .or / the farward channel which is the tawer speaking ta the phane. The ather prablem that we have is that the phane needs ta speak ta the tawer and regardless .of the pawer level we set this at, if the tawer reaches the phane but the phane daesn't reach the tawer,.. the call daesn't wark. Sa the phanes are getting much much smaller, and sa again we've gene ta the micra cell technalagy in dense urban enviranments .or inside buildings because we want ta lacate the antenna which is bath the send and receive as clese as pas sible ta the custemer. Hapefully that answers the first part .of yaur questian which was talking abaut pawering up the site and why can't we da that ta salve .our prablem. Because it's nat gaing ta salve the ather problem an the reverse end, plus it's gaing ta create a huge amaunt .of prablems in the area with the ather sites lacated bath in Cennecticut with .our campetitian and alsa in the Hamptans. J Dinizia: Just .one mare thing. I'd just like ta cancentrate an this. Yau knaw the argument kind .of flies. in the face .of everything if you're telling me that the same exact phane in Orient can talk ta Cannecticut but can't ta yaur tower in Greenpart. Mr. Gazza: There it is, again, yau're talking abaut water. There is nathing in its way. Yaur talking abaut sites that are 300' abave graund level that are pawered up much much higher than .ours. Again yau're getting inta haw we engineer .our netwark and they engineer their netwark different than the way we da and we try ta cae~dst and we have manthly meetings. And we're always asking them ta pawer their sites dawn because they're infringing onto .our netwark. But if we dan't have a source .of RF in the area there is very little we can da ta fix that prablem. PagG 20 - Trnnscl'ipt of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals J Dinizio: OK Now you've answered the forward part, but what about the other side. What about the this guy talking to that cell site? Mr. Gazzo: Again, it's a clear line .of sight, this is not a clear line of sight here. It may be flat in you mind, but at six feet there are trees, there is a lot in the way. When you're going this way ies a much clearer line of sight. Plus this is a much higher antenna. Our antennas aren't as high. - ~ B Villa: If that's the case, you'd need a pole every fifty feet. If a tree is going to stop you. Inaudible due to noise in room. There are houses that are 35'. Mr. Gazzo: No. Chairman: I've got a question back there. Sir, you've been very patient thank you. Just state your name for the record. Bob Hicks: I'm very confused at least with the technology that this man is putting forward. In other words, we're at the mercy of the technology which NYNEX is developing as opposed to something in Connecticut which/ can overcome these problems by boosting the power. But the original suggestion that I put to the Board was Plum Island and I guess several others have, and I still don't see why there's a tower there, a water tower that's existing. And I don't know the- exact height, but the line of sight off of that tower has to be perfect for this area. Again, I'm not an engineer, you can rebut whatever you say. And from what I'm that your technology and I think that Bob Villa is just alluding to it, is micro, and you go to that and you're going to have a tower, God knows how frequent you'll need towers. Why don't you take something from Connecticut and see if you can't apply it here and save us all of these particular problems that we're coming up with, land values, site everything else. You're just going in your direction, you're NYNEX and you want to build towers. Where is your consideration for the people that are in Orient. Mr. Gazzo: I'll try and address again the issue about Connecticut and the way they design their system. When -you have a tower and someone said and I'm using information that was told tonight, that is nine miles across the water the level of service that you are going to get while you're roaming is not the level of service we want to provide. That's the company policy, that's the engineering rule. First of all we wouldn't want to put a tower over there to shoot back into here. We couldn't do that' because it's not our CGSA which is the cellular geographic service area which we're licensed to provide service within. And again we go back to the level of service. Everybody has a perception of what they deem to be an acceptable level of service. We go by several criteria we've talked about and based upon that criteria we need a site in this area. Again I still haven't answered your question about micro cell technology to your fullest extent. I'd like to dabble on that right now, to see if I can help. Page 21 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals J Dinizio: That's why I asked it. - Mr. Gazzo: I'm pretty familiar with trying to use a micro cell technology in an area like this. The problem you get into is then you don't fully cover the area and your create now mini spots. And the mill spots now become micro cell type holes, so then how do you begin to fill those. If you don't get the coverage the way you need it. It's not an urban environment the coverage is not going to dictate where I want it to go by using these smaller antennas. It's not a feasible solution for me to try and do that with micro cells. L Tortora: Aren't they built into "the cable systems. There are no towers is my understanding. Mr. Gazzo: It's a lot. You know. The public hears a lot about this stuff but it's not being done it's all kind of like vapor-wear. Like when someone comes into you and tells you we're going to be doing this or we're almost close to doing this we're almost there, but when you really sit down and I try and sit down with these people and say well what do you have, what is the product you have, because I would love to be able,/ to hang stuff off of poles and do this type of technology out here to save the cost of putting up a tower and the cost of going to hearings like this, but it's just not available today. L Tortora: It's not available because of the cable companies? Mr. Gazzo: The technology hasn't reached that plateau. If you want to get into the actual micro-electronics of what goes on, at our frequency range you need to build a certain size amplifier that produces a certain size power output and then you have to have a power supply and then you have to have fiberoptics that go to it. All of that stuff. And then it has to fit into a certain size canister and then it has to go to certain antennas that go a certain _ way. It's hasn't all come together, they are working towards that. Beyond that point, and your next question would be then why would you put this up here if it's going to be there and then you could come back and do that, it's again, it's not feasible then for an area, for a rural area. It's just if;n't feasible. You'd have" to put so many of these to get the type of coverage you'd need, it becomes infeasible. Chairman: I've got a bunch of questions that have to be asked in the audience here. Do you want to address that issue Mr. Villa? B Villa: No. Chairman: OK There was someone on my right. Jim Latham: Orient. I was just picking up on question. You haven't answered Mr. Dinizio's question. I'm still a little vague as to whether you answered it fully, or whatever. The micro cell will not work, or it would be more expensive? Page 22 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January IG, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals Mr. Gazzo: Current technology, it will not work. J Latham: It works in the city and other areas, but it will not work out here. Mr. Gazzo: In the city it's located inside of a building. Basically you wire a whole building in the city. You have a lot more space to place all of these huge types of cabinets and it's a much more denser environment. And also the signal then stays inside the building. J Latham: But within a period of time micro cell might work in this area. Mr. Gazzo: Then you go to the other issue of it not being feasible for a rural type area. Chairman: OK, this lady is next. Gerry Woodhouse: Two of the problems that I hear you talking about, one is customer complaints and the other is that cellular phones have gotten smaller and have less power. Which you might not have anticipated / when you built the tower in Greenport or Cutchogue, I don't know. So the two questions I have are: one of them, you talk about customer complaints, do you have a number of customers who live in Orient or Southold who are complaining or where are the complaints coming from in terms of your customer base? And secondly; < if you forecast the future and you must have some sense of where the industry is going, if you built this tower now what else do you anticipate happening in the future that might create changes in the cellular system. Do you forecast you might need another tower in E. Marion or another tower somewhere else on the North Fork, do you forecast that there might be other changes in cellular phones, that they'll get even smaller with less power? What do you see happening down the road and what can you tell us about the customer base? Mr. Gazzo: With the passage of the, and I don't mean to go into the legal ramifications of this but, but this is the answer I have to give you. With respect to the customer inform~tion, with the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 the passage of what's called CPI Customer Proprietary Information, and what that says is that we've contracted with a customer to provide a specific service and only that service so we are not allowed to at all take any of that information that we have about our customers and let that become public. That's CPr. Your second question, you talked about the industry and where it is going and cellular phones and where they're going. First of all, cellular phones will obviously get to a point where they won't get any smaller because from an aerodynamics point of view, from usage from a human being it won't be able to get any smaller because it won't be able to be used. As far as planning for the area, yes, we do have a plan and I discussed what that plan was briefly; is that we have a spot down here, which we are looking for site in Ml!!!ituck. You brought up a very good point about E. Marion and I did study the area and I want to tie in some Page 23 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals of the other things. If we were to put the site out on Plum Island and this is the main reason why we can't do that, what's going to happen, at the current way we engineer our system, if the site were to go at Plum Is. Point what would happen here is you would create a dead spot right in this area. And that dead spot is caused because this is a causeway. The terrain changes, however everyone perceives the terrain changing, I have the data for it, and it changes and it creates a dead spot. So by doing that we would then have a site there and we would need a site here. So this basically solves the problem by putting one site we're solving the problem. Chairman: To Mr. Rieger and then back. John Rieger: I don't know how to start but I was very instrumental, I'm a ham radio operator for one thing. I'm a ham radio operator and I was very instrumental in putting up a repeater in Greenport. Now our repeater covers all of Orient, it covers Riverhead, why can't you put your tower on the Greenport tower, where the Greenport tower is; or get on the Greenport tower. The Fire Station is on there, the Nassau Police are on there, the Suffolk County Police are on there, the hams are onl there and I don't know what else is on the water tower in Greenport. Why can't you use that and it would give you coverage. Mr. Gazzo: We currently have a site in Greenport on that tower. Mr. Rieger: That's more like it. Chairman: Why don't you put more power on that? Mr. Gazzo: We discussed the issue. It's not an issue of more power. More power in our case doesn't work better. Mr. Rieger: It's height and power, you know that. Mr. Gazzo: And I understand a small amount how ham operators operate, several of them are my friends. We use a pattern of frequency reuse. Mr. Rieger: Yes I know the frequency you use. Mr. Gazzo: No, frequency re-use. Which means that, it's basically, if you give me a second I'll try to think of an analogy. We're given a set of numbers, the numbers 1-4, and what we have to do is we have to take those numbers and we have to put a number here and we have to put a number here and we have to put a number here. Now as we grow, we have to keep using those same numbers again and those numbers can't interfere with each another. So you know that sometimes you'll get a skip, you know what a skip is. You'll skip for miles, what happens if you get a skip let say in Southern Jersey, what happens to some of your fellow ham operators, they may get bumped off, because you're getting a PagEl 24 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals skip and you 're bumping them off, because you're using the frequencies that have been delegated to their repeaters in their area. Mr. Rieger: But when you get that skip you might have the same trouble right here in Orient. You're liable to get the same pt'Oblem. Mr. Gazzo: And we're not allowed to do that. Mr. Riegel': Propagation is sometimes very funny. Mr. Gazzo: Exactly, and we cannot have that type of thing happening in our network because our customers will not stand for it. Beyond that, the FCC will not stand for us interfering with other networks other systems. So you understand my point. Mr. Rieger: I understand you're point, and there's another space that you might look into which is very close and it's right by the airport in Orient. There's a windmill and I'm sure that they'd be tickled to death to rent you the land. And that's, what are we talking about, another mile? Mr. Gazzo: It would have to be tested and evaluated. / Mr. Rieger: Well, I built a radio station in 1959, I went all through this. And there is a way. And I found a way. And you must find a way. Mr. Gazzo: There's a big difference between building a radio station and building out a cellular network. It's the same basic physics and you admitted to that about the skip and about your frequencies travelling over many distances on certain occasions and creating interference. We can't have that. So it's very delicate where we place our sites. Beyond that you asked me to evaluate a site while I'm standing up here, you wouldn't walk into a doctor's office and say you had a pain in your stomach and say you wanted to take medicine right now about it, if he said to you he needed to do some testing. So I think that's an unfair position to put on me. Chairman: Mr. Peluso. Ralph Peluso: I keep on hearing that people say that cellular phones are getting smaller and smaller and less powerful. What do you mean by less powerful? Mr. Gazzo: OK In 1984 when cellular was first created many people had what was called an installed phone. A cellular phone in their vehicle with an antenna which was external to the vehicle. This antenna was a larger antenna, it had a larger amount of. gain as compared to the antennas today and the amplifier and the phone was bigger, larger and was more powerful, thus enabling the customer to travel farther away from the cell, that was called a 3 watt phone. Today the phones have come down in power to six tenths of a watt and even less that that. Page 25 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals R Peluso: OK What I relate to power, I relate to power OK- the battery, OK, not the wattage that's going out, I'm relating to the battery outlet. If I have a cellular phone and I have a battery that's good for four hours what difference does it make if I can't use that phone because, maybe I need another battery I have to recharge. Do you know what I'm saying? Mr. Gazzo: OK the power you're talking about is a form of power. That's the power that powers the phone. The power I'm talking about is the radiated power phone to phone from your cellular antenna. So, if you just look at it as a quick block diagram you have a block here which is your power source which is your battery, and then you have another block which is basically your receiver 'or your transceiver and your phone which is basically your phone and then you have your antenna. That powers this to make it do something and then there's a power that comes out of here. As you condense the size of this type of equipment, the output power gets much lower and its a function of the battery because the battery is lower. And that's where the technology is going today. Mr. Peluso: So if the battery is lower, then you can't use the phone anyway, that's what I'm trying to say. And you keep saying the size of / the phone, I have a cellular phone as big as a credit card and I'll go to Orient and I'll call you up right now, deal. And then we'll just squash ~verything. I'll make the phone call here and that's it, is that a deal. Chairman: Gentlemen. I don't mean to restrict you, but the gentleman in the blue sweater in back of you- I think is you husband. Could you please state your name for the record. John Woodhouse: My question is that by putting these towers up they must have a certain distance that they can cover. The one that's in Greenport how far can that go out, one mile, two miles? What is there coverage or radius of coverage? Mr. Gazzo: OK Based upon the way we re-evaluate the network every year and going back to the ERP or the power the phone radiates, as that changes, we change the footprint of the site. Basically when you first put up a site what you're looking at is the terrain and the height and the power you're at. So in an environment where there is a terrain condition that's going to.., what I'm trying to say is there is no cutter way to say that every site we put up in the network is going to have a 1 mile radius or every site's going to have a 5 mile radius. The contour of the site changes based upon the' environment its in and todays environment dictates that the sites become closer together. Mr. Woodhouse: What you're saying if you put that up in a mountainous area you may have an antenna every half mile. Mr. Gazzo: If we locate the antennas correct. If the antennas are located in the valley of the mountains, yes. If the antennas are located on the peaks of the mountains we're going to be serving the airplanes. Page 26 - Transcript of NYNEX Hearing January 16, 1997 Southold Town Board of Appeals Mr. Woodhouse: OK The height of the tower determines the distance that that signal is going to travel unobstructed right? Mr. Gazzo: Right and the power. Mr. Woodhouse: As John Rieger said if you have a taller tower. you can go from Greenport to Orient without any difficulty. Mr. Gazzo: Again that's correct with tower, that's called the forward power. That's called me standing on top of the Empire State Building and . .. a very good example, if I stand on top of the Empire State Buildings Observation Deck and take a set of binoculars I can look out for many many miles, many miles, I can see points on L.I. but I believe if you were to be standing in Uniondale in Nassau County the possibility of you seeing me on the Empire State Building is pretty dim. And that's what we're talking about. We're talking about the person who has the phone trying to communicate back to the tower. Mr. Woodhouse: Even if you put this thing in Orient at this point, you cannot tell us the distance that antenna will cover? / Mr. Gazzo: Oh yes I can. Mr. Woodhouse: How many miles? Mr. Gazzo: It's going to cover the point from basically the E. Marion point here. If you look at this area right now what we have is white. Basically what I'm intending to cover is this whole area here. And based upon the height the power the elevation I've gone at with the location I've picked, I'll be able to do that., This sites going to cover from the E. Marion point here all the way to the tip of Orient. Audience members: Yeah but who is going to benefit? Chairman: Can we get Mrs. Peluso. Ellen Peluso: Mr. Chairman, esteemed Board members, esteemed experts, OK, I'm a property owner, my property is going to be right across, my front window look out at your tower. I'm not an engineer or a expert but I'm a property owner and I worked hard for that property. We've been sitting here for 3,4 hours, I'm sure you could speak another 5. We do not want the tower. I can speak for all of us, Yes or No. We don't want the tower and we would like to know how we can just stop it. That's all we want to know. OK Chairman: I have to, with everybody's indulgence, I have to take a quick break and it will some people at least a chance. It will give this gentleman a breather. If you have any qualified witnesses that aren't going to make it back here let's use them first after this gentlemen. Mr. H Pachman: I don't understand what you mean Mr. Chairman. . . TRANSCRIPT EXCERPTS BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1997 .... - Page 21 - I3cll-Atlalltic/NYNEX TRANSCRIPT Public Hearing held 3/19/97 Southold Town Board of Appeals HOWARD PACHMAN,ESQ: Chairman. I can't answer that question, Mr. SECRETARY LINDA KOWALSKI: borrow mine. I have one if you want to MEMBER DINIZIO: That's one way of getting a phone. Give it to me for a month, I'll test it out for you. HOWARD PACIIMAN ESQ: Mr. Gazzohas a question of you, Mr. Dinizio, based upon that, I think. MEMBER DINIZ!O: OK MR. GAZZO: Just to try and, I was trying to make people understand and you asked why we technically need something, and you're trying to understand our technical need. The only analogy I can make that may be partly to your past career was that you worked for the Cable Company. Is that correct? MEMBER DINIZIO: (Nodded affirmative.) MR. GAZZO: When you developed your cable system, and you did your distribution, and you designed your distribution network for your signal strength, that would ultimately, it's called a lost budget, where you would get tQ Jlle end use of the customer, right? That's called a distribution. network, a lost budget. There has to be some specification that somebody says, this is the mark. This is where it is. You don't go around and survey 100,000 people in their homes and say "Does it look good to you, ok, thanks. How does that look to you?" You can't go buy something that is nonconcrete and nontangible, because what one person views as quality service, another person does not view as quality service, and especially when you get into video and the way video is. I have people who are fanatics, who come over to my house and say, "How can you watch that? There's lines, I can see the lines of resolution. My brother-in-law works for a cablevision and he said, "Your. line- you have a crack in your line. You need to fix that.: It looks fine to me, but I'm not going to portray to them, how to provide their services, and the engineering standards that they have to set to get general customer satisfaction, and I think we have a certain engineering status that we have to keep, and we deemed that this area does needs it, and you even said, your call was not the best quality on AT&T's network, and AT&T does have a site closer to this area than our site. Our site is much further away. Thus in essence, you're kind of proving my case for me just by saying that, because they are closer so they are going to get a better signal in here. MEMBER DINIZIO: Yes, I would like to know where that is? MR. GAZZO: I think it's behind the Police Station, right? Page 25 - Bell-Atlantic/NYNEX TRANSCRIPT Public Hearing held 3/19/97 Southold Town Board of Appeals HOWARD PACHMAN ESQ: Well, we definitely know that the AT&T Cellular One site is at Elijah's Lane because that was the application for that particular site. It has just come to my attention tonight when I found this other information with reference to the NYNEX-TEL site on the Police tower, that there also may be a Metro One tower on that. If that's the case, then it's even closer. So your needs, and I haven't run a survey of where the other sites are for AT&T. Now, but I think the issue and I want to take it under advisement, I heard what you said, Mr. Chairman, and -. CHAIRMAN: We don't even have to do that. We can meet Mr. Gazzohere, and if we can ride around with him. We don't have to make sporadic calls. HOWARD PACHMAN ESQ: But you see -. CHAIRMAN: We're trying to put people's minds at rest here, and trying to answer all the questions of these very nice people who are very concerned. HOWARD PACHMAN ESQ: I understand that. They're not concerned about the service, they're concerned about the tower. Let's not misunderstand what they're concerned about. They don't care about one idiota about the service. They are only concerned about the tower. CHAIRMAN: You're telling me that I - HOWARD PACHl\lAN ESQ: Visually. CHAIRMAN: Yes. You're telling me that I'm discriminating against you on certain issues, ok. HOWARD PACHMAN ESQ: Yes. CHAIRMAN: OK, I'm saying to you tha~ you have - . HOWARD PACHMAN ESQ: If you turned me down, you are. CHAIRMAN: I'm telling you, that you haven't, I realize that you have all the technicians here, and we were extremely impressed with Mr. Gazzo'stestimony, and we still are, ok. However, the proof has not been - has not been put in the pudding, you know? We can understand that, but we're not at the site and we can't see how poor the reception is at that site. HOWARD PACHMAN ESQ: I would - before I say yes and before I say no, I would like to take that under advisement. CHAIRMAN: Sure. Page 26 - Bcll-Atlantic/NYNEX TRANSCRIPT Public Hearing held 3/19/97 Southolcl Town Board of Appeals HOWARD PACHMAN ESQ: writing as to my decision. And I will correspond to you in CHAIRMAN: Sure. MEMBER DINIZIO: May I ask a question of Mr. Gazzo? You know, I understand all the engineering parts of it, ok, because of my experience and I guess what I'm saying to you is, you said last time, when I askeda question and I ask it wrong. I'm asking about transmittal power out of the antenna, and you're discussing basically what the transmittal power is from the phone cell. I would just like to have some kind of benchmark as to just exactly far can an antenna, how sensitive can an antenna be to pick up the least powerful pes or whatever it's going to be. I need an idea of just what your benchmark is. You told me last time that, that was proprietary, and in my mind I don't know how it can possibly be proprietary. I just don't want to take the time to do the formula - I thought I could take advantage of your experience, in that you're in it, to tell me what is the furthest that one of these, the least powerful device could transmit the most sensitive antenna? That would give me an idea of the need of what you need. Now, there have been things said here tonight that I don't agree with. There are alot of things that I don't agree with, ok, and not all of us agree on everything, but that particular part of it, you have. to- show me that technically, because you're saying technically you need this, but prove it to me technically, that in the future you're going to need this. Just tell me what it's going to take for you to have that antenna and why you need it. Why you can't put it say in Greenport. Why you can't put it out in Plum Island. People have told me, people have suggested those things. I would like to know the reason why. Don't just tell me because it's not advantageous to you. 'I:ell me why. Tell me why technically, why that can't "be done. And I'm sure you can. I'm pretty sure you could probably prove that to me. CHAIRMAN: Wait one second, we're trying to get all this done here. Sir? MR. GAZZO: You asked a multitude of questions there. MEMBER DINIZIO: I'll ask a single question. sensitivity "of the antenna? Give me the HOWARD PACHMAN ESQ: respond to it in writing. We will look at it again and MEMBER DINIZIO: Yes, that would be good. MR. GAZZO: Just to expand on that. MEMBER DINIZIO: I appreciate that. Page 27 - 13ell-AtIantic/NYNEX TRANSCRIPT Public Hearing held 3/19/97 Southold Town 130ard of Appeals HOWARD PACIIMAN ESQ: minutes from Ms. Kowalski. Mr. Dinizio, we wiII get the MEMBER DINIZIO: I'm ready to reduce that to writing, Howard, I'll reduce it to writing to you to nigh t and fax it to you tomorrow. HOWARD PACHMAN ESQ: She'll have it on the record. You'll have it in about a week or ten days? SECRETARY LINDA KOWALSKI: planing on doing it that fast. HOWARD PACHMAN ESQ: OK. I'll have it. You're not meeting again to make a decision on this until sometime in April hopefully, and we'll answer you in writing. Hopefully, yes. We're MEMBER DINIZIO: Thank you. HOWARD PACHMAN ESQ: And your questions. CHAIRMAN: OK, I guess that concludes it. Mrs. Tortora? MEMBER TORTORA: No. CHAIRMAN: like to speak. in the center? I guess we'll stat't with all the. p~ople I think the gentlemen in the rear, I Pardon me for pointing to everybody. that would should say SECRETARY LINDA KOWALSKI: You need a name first too. CHAIRMAN: I need your name Sir. The gentleman in the red sweater. CHAIRMAN: Yes. Can I jl.lst ask this gentlemen in the black sweater. I forgot your name Sir. Sorry, I apologize MR. PELUSO: Mr. Peluso. CHAIRMAN: Somewhere along the line we will get back to you, and I apologize for the discourse. I would like to see you at your house and would like to try your Bell Atlantic. MS. Can we start a little out of order because someone has to do it? CHAIRMAN: Just state your name for the record, and try to be as brief as possible. MS. CAROL GILLOOLY: I wasn't planning on speaking but I started to get excited when you were talking, so I've just written a few notes. For starters, I don't think I've ever spoken before a ZBA meeting before and I don't think I've ever attended one before, but perhaps I have. They're are lots of .... Page 28 - I3ell-Atlantic/NYNEX TRANSCRIPT Public Hearing held 3119/97 Southold Town I30ard of Appeals things in life that have become legal, that aren't necessarily correct. Excuse me, I didn't speak while you were speaking. There not necessarily correct and that's why we have 55,000 cars a month passing through our ferry. I'm in the business that is 90% generated on the telephone. I'm a headhunter. I'm a New York State- Corporation, and I'm President of that corporation, and I live in Orient. I've lived in Orient and I've been a full time resident there for the last 15 years. I purchased my first cellular phone in 1982. That phone costs me $2,000.00 at the time. I have probably more excessive phone bills. I incur over $2000.00 a month in phone bills. To prove that, they're not all cellular. I am willing to sacrifice any q uali ty of service although I'm not saying that I have. I am willing to sacrifice any quality of service that I may incur for quality of life. There is no one else in this Town as a local person that has more of a use of a car phone than I do. The purpose of this tower in my opinion is only to accommodate passersby. Those people that are transient and going to the ferry. Why do we want this? Why should Orient accommodate passers through to the ferry. Why should we accept this tower? i\1r. Pachman talked about capacity. Who's challenging that capacity? Orient people aren't challenging that capacity. People that are going "'f6: the ferry are challenging that capacity. Nynex has free weekends, free evenings. Local people are not challenging the capacity of that servIce. You're talking about seamless service. I have used my car phone for the last 15 years up and down. I live with the telephone in my hand, at all times. I have a AT&T and I have a Nynex and I have Central Florida Cellular. If you travel up and down the coast anywhere along the coast, North and South Carolina for the .most part, you do not pick up car phone service. Hey, too bad. That's part of life. I think we should put this in Greenport. I think we should put this in Plum Island, and if it negatively impacts - it does negatively impact our quality of life. You talked about cablevision before. Cablevision is not for people going to the ferry. If you have a problem with cablevision, it's for your next door neighbor and the people of the town to get together and decide what we want for cablevision. It's not going to accommodate ou t of towners. I'm asking you to please deny this application. CHAIRMAN: Thank yotl. I think it works out better that if we go from this side of the room. Let's start, we'll go with Freddie please, and then we'll move over to the center and then over to the easterly side. FREDDIE WACHSI3ERGER: Freddie Wachsberger from Orient. Once again this board is faced with a decision that will impact very crucially on the future of Southold. Federal regulations put a serious burden on towns and municipalities to Page 29 - Bell-At!antic/NYNEX TRANSCRIPT Public Hearing held 3/19/97 Southold Town Board or Appeuls accommodate a potential proliferation of communication towers. One of the Federal stipulations, as was expressed tonight, is that there be no discrimination among providers. Therefore, if this tower were to be permitted in this agricultural, residential area, it would be if I understand the legislation correctly, virtufllly impossible for the town to deny access for other 100 foot towers, or 82 foot towers, in similar agricultural residential areas. Towns and municipalities all over the country have objected to the intrusion of these towers on residential areas. In fact, there was a major national conference on the problem last year, which prodttced guidelines for. local zoning solutions. The Federal Government has responded to the desire to protect the residential communities, by making federal property available for the placement of wireless communication towers and equipment. The FCC encourages utilization of towers, by more than one carrier. As a matter of fact, the FCC guidelines, tlus is 1.1306 note A: It says the use of existing buildings, towers or corridors is an environmentally desirable alternative to the construction of new facilities that is to be encouraged. If the AT&T, the AT&T tower is carrying adequately perhaps Nynexwould want to go on board with that, rather than build a separate tower. At the last hearing on this application, presently before this board, the applicant referred to the fact, that there are already telephone poles. Well, nobody is happy. with those. In fact communities and municipalities today have the foresightand ability to insist on underground wires. Half the towns have the opportunity to anticipate and control the siting of towers. That opportunity must not be lost. Towns and municipalities everywhere are calling for moratoriums for the purpose of addressing this issue. Clearly, the present application should not be considered any other application for cellular tower, until the Town Board has taken the opportunity to develop a town wide zoning solution, as is the town's right and its responsibility. But, as it is before this board tonight, I would like to address the implications of this petition. for Orient. In an article in the New Yorker in 1989 about preserving a sense of place, which in fact contained many references to the North Fork, and you might have read it. Tony Hiss quoted significant observation, worth paying close attention to. People start to discount a landscape and lose their sense of connectedness to it. As soon as even a few blemishes crop up. The Chairman of the New York City Audubon Society Conservation Committee has even come up with a rough mathematical formula to measure land preservation. The first 5% of development in a countryside region, generally does 50% of the damage. In terms of altering people's mental geography of area; and the second 5% of development enlarges this damage to another 50%. I believe that the tower proposed by the applicant would have at least as radical 8n effect. Pnge 30 - Oell-AUIllltic/NYNEX TRANSCRIPT Public Hearing held 3/19/97 Southold Towll Board of Appeals The people of Orient and the other Southold Town villages and Hamlets, have a very strong sense of place. The people who choose to live here and the tourists who choose to come to visit are drawn by the rural historic landscape. Not because it reminds us of an earlier time, but because it still is a humane landscape in which to live, and it is very fragile. The value of homes in our area and the attraction of our tourists to our area depend on the preservation of this fragile sense of place. Orient is a narrow strip of land with fewer than 600 mailboxes. The applicant at the last hearing refused to substantiate the origin or number of complaints about inadequate reception in Orient, saying that it was confidential information. I would have thought that it would have been the limit the board might require for demonstration of a need for this tower. I know that those I know in Orient who use a cellular phone say that it works fine. But even if there were an nano-second dtlring which a driver passing through on the way to the ferry were to experience a momentary loss of service and that hasn't been proven, would that be adequate reason to destroy the value of people's homes? Would it be adequate reason to destroy the experience of historic landscape, including a Natural Historic District to which tlils site is virtually adjacent? Does that make sense to anybody? The government regulations are sensitive to tills issue. Article 1.1307 of the Federal Communications Commission Regulations addresses actions to which. environmental assessments must be prepared. Under sub-numeral -!R, facilities that may affect district sites, building structures or objects significant in American History, Architecture, Archeology, Engineering or Ctllture, that are listed or are eligible for listing in the Natural Register for Historic places. "That may affect districts" is the wording, not that are "in districts." The RN Association will submit to the board the written petition as for Article 1.1307C documenting the necessity for environmental review. But there should be no need for the applicant to prepare an environmental assessment on the site. Rather, the application should be rejected immediately. ' The Board I feel has excellent reasons for rejeption. The small population of Orient and its proximity to the existing tower in Greenport. The potential severe negative impact on the value of homes, not only those immediately adjacent, but in the whole area, and the proximity of the tower to the Natural Historic District, and the Historic Road, and the Kings Highway, with its 18 and 19 Century homes, all of which would be dwarfed and diminished. The negative impact would fall on second home and residential values and on tourism, both essential elements of Southold Town's economy. I ask you to preserve our sense of place by rejecting this proposal, and I thank you for your patience. - - Page 31 - Bell-Atlalltic/NYNEX TRANSCRIPT Public Hearing held 3/19/97 Southold Town Board of Appeals CHAIRMAN: Thank you. that. Thank you so much. I was just going to ask you for OK, Mr. Gillooly? MR. WILLIAM GILLOOLY: Thank you. My name is Bill Gilloolyand I live in Orient. As I understand it, I wasn't going to speak either but, part of the application is based on the Federal Communication Commission's insistence, that there be a seamless service. I think Jimmy's questions were very, very important.. I'm confused. Metro One and Cellular One. Metro One became -. CHAIRMAN: Cellular One. MR. WILLIAM GILLOOLY: Cellular, well there were two. What were the two five or six years ago? CHAIRMAN: Nynex and Cellula.r One, and Metro One. SECRETARY LINDA KOWALSKI: Metro Cellular. MR. GAZZO: The board wants me to respond, I'll respond. CHAIRMAN: Respond, please, Mr. Gazzo respond. MR. PACHMAN: The question, there were two sites, there's a Cellular One site which is AT&T (interrupted).. MR. WILLIAM GILLOOLY: Excuse me. I just about six years ago, there were two cellular area. One was called Metro One as I remember. wondered. services in No, the MR. GAZZO: was Nynex. Cellular One or Metro One, and the other one MR. WILLIAM GILLOOLY: and Metro One is - OK, Nynex is still Nynex, MR. GAZZO: No Mobile Communication; One/Cell One Wireless. Nynex is now, and AT&T does Bell Atlantic Nynex business under Metro MR. WILLIAM GILLOOLY: Well ok. CHAIRMAN: I think AT&T wireless bought Cellular One. Is that correct? MR. GAZZO: Yes. MATTHEW PACHMAN: Cellular Communications Company d/b/a Metro One, which is now AT&T wireless. CHAIRMAN: Wireless, right. Page 32 - Bell-At1untie/NYNEX TRANSCRIPT Public Hearing held 31 HJ/97 Southold Town Board of Appeals MR. WILLIAM GILLOOLY: The reason I say Jim's comments were important is this. Two cellular, as I understand it, two cellular companies are chartered to do business in this area. Six years ago, I negotiated contracts with two separate cellular companies for placement of their antennas and auxiliary buildings attheGreenport Water Tower site. They were ten year leases - this goes back six years ago, with ten year options at that point, and my understanding at that point talking to the engineers was that the cellular pattern from the Greenport tower, being, I think it was about 89 feet or something, the antenna reflects that- would encompass a five to eight mile diameter. In other words, there would be, excuse me, my geometry isn't good - the circle would be 10 to 16 miles around, and at that point, hey said with the advanced technology, this will be all you'll need, to cover this portion of the () i may have changed, but I think your comments, based on the fact that I think those antennas are still there, since they're paying I think, about $3,000.00 a month each to the Village of Greenport, would mean that the adequate service six years ago was there, and I don't know what's changed in the last six years but the bottom line was that they felt that that for ten (10) years, and for another ten years after that on the renewal of the lease, that they would cover the area from Orient Point, well into Southold, with those two antennas, and I don't know what has changed since then, but I think Jimmy's information is important. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Bill. have two people getting up. Do your name for the record? Over here, thank you. We you want to yield? Just state MR. WALTER MILLIS: My name if Walter Millis. I am a resident of Orient. I echo Freddie Wachsberger'seloquent comments on the state of the landscape, on the state of the sky line in Orient whic.h would be damaged irretrievably, it seems to me by an 80 foot tower. I have a cellular telephone. It works just fine. I haven't had any problem with it at all. It is AT&T's, not Nynex's and I would suggest that perhaps the answer to that problem is if you have a C Nynex phone and it In any case, it's born on me that in the next fews years, technology will move along to the point that this tower won't be necessary anyway, and I would hope the board would turn this down, both on appearance grounds and the fact that it really isn't necessary. Thank you. CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Sir. Mr. Latham? MR. JIM LATHAM: I'm the adjoining property owner running along Platt Road. Also, a 10-1/2 acre acre parcel, and I'm opposed to the tower. I've prepared a petition signed by 86 people of Orient opposed to the change in zoning, which I'd like to submit to the board. CHAIRMAN: Sure. AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN GAISO Zoning Board of Appeals: Town of Southold state of New York: County of Suffolk ------------------------------------------x In the matter of the Application of NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Bell Atlantic NYNEX MObile, Inc., a public utility of the State of New York Premises: 24850 Main Road Southold, New York Affidavit Application Nos.: 446SE and 446V ------------------------------------------x STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) 55: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) JOHN GAISO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer employed by New York SMSA Limited Partnership, d/b/a Bell Atlantic NYNEX MObile, Inc. ("Bell Atlantic"). I testified at tb~ ctwo prior hearings with respect to this application. My resUme detailing my formal education, training and experience was previously submitted in evidence. 2 . I submit this aff idavi t: (i) in support of the application by Bell Atlantic for a special permit and variance to permit construction of a public utility structure, designed to remedy a service deficiency in cellular telephone coverage that exists within the hamlet of Orient; and (ii) in response to the question asked by Board Member Dinizio at the March 19, 1997 hearing date. 3. Upon review of the question with respect to transmittal power, I believe that I answered that question during my two appearances before the Board. I can't supply any additional information. 4. There were two issues which were raised for the first time, which I will answer: (a) a standard handheld cellular phone is designed by the phone manufacturer to be less than 600 milliwatts. (b) Bell Atlantic's design for the orient monopole is 11 d B gain antennas for receive and transmission. 5. As I have stated before in my testimony.before the Board, the proposed site is necessary to enable the Company to send seamless and adequate service and no alternate site in the area is available in Orient search area. 6. During the course of the previous public hearing, certain questions were asked by Board members concerning number of calls complaining of the inadequacy of service in the Orient area by Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile customers. I explained that such information is Bell Atlantic's proprietary customer information which I can not disclose. This position is supported by the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 more particularly Section 702. Respectfully submitted, Sworn to before me this ;:)'-\ day of April, 1997 j\~i A~Ct' V-- Notary Public ~O& JO GAISO '.J MATTHEWE. _ Ncnary Pubtic. Sm. of New" No 4928887 QUallfred in SuffoIt CcutIy r:~_ r,. ....~._~.:"\n I;!l'tlires April 4. 1....:Js,) egm:c:\DOCS\NYNEX\GASIO.AFF 2 AFFIDAVIT OF PIDLIP K. CHARALEL .. Zoning Board or Appeals: Town of Southold State of New York: County of Suffolk ------------------------------------------x In the matter of the Application ot NEW YORK SHSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc., a public utility of the State of New York Aft1davi t Premises: 24850 Main Road Southold, New York Application Nos.: 446SE and 446V ------------------------------------------x J<-r<><-y State of New YOH ) Scrme.(;e-r ) ss. : County of We.~ehe.ter) PHILIP K. CMARALEL, being duly sworn, deposes and says: Zftt:.roduct:.ioll 1. I am a radio frequency engineer employed by New York SHSA Limited PartnerShip, d/b/a Bell Atlantic NYNEX MObile, Inc. ("Bell At.lantic"). I have been involved in radio frequency engineering for over fourteen (14) years. cRy resume detailing my formal education, t.raining and experience is at.t.ached heret.o as Bzhibit "A". 2. I submit this afridavit in support of the applicat.ion by Bell At.lantic for a special permit and variance to permit. construct.ion or a public utility st.ructure, clesigned to remedy a service deficiency in cellular telephone coverage t.hat. exists within the hamlet or Orient.. J. The proposecl public utility structure consists of II 84 foot tall t.ower, and an equipment shelter at the base thereof, to be locat.ed at. 24850 Rain Road, Orient, New York (the "Orient Site"). (Gaiso), previous M.ed for ~h. ori.ft~ 8i~. 4. I have reviewed the analysis performed by John Gaieo the radio frequency engineer, who testified at the hearing dates wit.h respect to this application. I 1 JV.A'\Ol/IMT.P\CHARA~lr.A" OJ./2]/97 15:3' . completely concur that there is a serious deficiency in Bell Atlantic's cellular telephone coverage in the hamlet of Orient of the Town of Southold (the orient Area). A .ervice deficiency in coverage is evidenced by the inability to adequately transmit or receive calls, by interrupted or disconnected calls, or by cross- talk or inte~odulation that renders a call with an unacceptable quality of audibility. 5. The service deficiency in coverage that exists in the Orient area prevents Bell Atlantic from providing' seamless cellular coverage to public and private users, including' pOlice, fire, ambulance and emergoency response personnel. 6. I base this conclusion on personal knowledg'e, gained through my use of the following tools, which RF engineers employ to identify gaps in cellular coverage: (i) computer modeling and (ii) drive tests, which measure the actual degradation in signal strength as predicted by computer aodeling. 7. r am advised that a map generated with computer modeling showing the service deficiency in cellular coverage that exists in the orient area was submitted in evidence during the first public hearing date with respect to this application. S. To confirm the service deficiency in the Orient area I perfo~ed drive tests throughout the area. These drive tests involved field measurements of the actual cellular signal strength in the Orient area. Through the drive tests I reconfirmed Gaiso's conclusion that a service deficiency in cellular coverage exists in Orient. ~h. ori.ft~ 8i~. i. Yd..!i. Loaa~.4 9. The Orient site is ideally located to rellledy the service deficiency in cellular coverage that exists in the orient area. 10. The Orient Site is situated in the approximate center of the area where the service deficiency exists. This permits the best possible coverage with the shortest possible tower. 11. My analysis confirms Gaiso's conclusion that the 2 )w:A:\ORIE.T.P\CHAaALET.... 04/23/97 15:34 orient site will provide adequate coverage for the orient area. Cellular users in that area using both standard car mounted units (typically operating at 3 watts) and users of low powered hand-held portable units will be able to maintain a stronger signal connection. 12. As testified to by Gaiso, to ensure that the Orient Site would be as visually unobtrusive, Bell Atlantic performed computer simulations to identify the minimWl tower height necessary to remedy the service deficiency. A height or 84 teet was determined to be the minimWl necessary height. Lower elevations would not provide the required coveraq.. A1~.raa~iv. .i~.. W.re eOB8idered 13. Cellular s.rvice Zionea are divided into grids of theoretically hexagonal geographic areas. The h.xagon patt.rn, how.ver, will be distorted and altered by topography such as hills and ridge lines, and is merely a theoretical tool used to computer modelinq. 14. In order to maintain continuous coverage, a cell site must b. able to "..... the mobi1. customer. It there is an obstruction, the radio signal will either bounce off, bounce back or be absorbed by the obstruction. Hills, trees, buildings and other objects all ettect the way a signal travels. 15. These physical limitations in cellular technology .ttect the number and type ot locations that qualify to remedy a service deficiency. 16. The coverage gap in the Orient area exists despite the operation of Bell Atlantic's site in the Village of Greenport. Bell Atlantic can not simply "turn up" the power on this site to provide coverage in Orient. Thus, limitations in technoloqy, topography and FCC regulations result in a finite number of alternative sites that may be considered possible candidates to remedy a service deficiency. I? Although it is true that a small area of the northeast portion of the Town of Shelter Island would be "covered" by the Orient Site, the overwhelming majority of Shelter Island is JW:A:\QIIR.T.P\CKARAlET.A~f 3 04'23/97 15:34 already "covered" by Bell Atlantic's site in the Village of Greenport. No portion of Long Island's south.fork will be served by the Orient site. The purpose of erecting the Orient site i. to solve the service deficiency in the Orient area, not Shelter Island or the south fork. ~8. Z have reviewed the area in need of our service in Orient and have determined, as did Gaiso, that the erecting of a Tower on Plumb Island would not .erve the need to supply service to the Orient area. cOllaluaioll ~9. Based on the foregoing data and analysis, it is my profes.ional opinion that (1) there exists a service deficiency in cellular coverage with the Orient area; (ii) the Orient Site is a location which will permit seamle.s cellular coverage to be achieved within the Orient area with the shortest possible antenna and; (iii) the effectivene.s of the Orient site is confirmed by both computer modeling and by actual drive tests. Based on the foregoing, the orient Site should be favorably considered by this Board and the requested special permit and variance should be granted. Respectfully submitted, /~~ ~J/( PHIi4P K. ~r. Sworn to before lIIe this 23rd day of April, 1997 ALuv? 7UOxd'~h ~ Notary Public OOI.OF'les McOONNELL-F'lOeHR NOTARY PUBLIC OF NEW JERSEY MY COMMISSlG!"1 E;1u'RES NOV. 30. 1997 4 jW.A.\ORI2NT.P\CHARALRT.AFF 04{23{97 15.34 Exhibit A / ". -.... / ./ Education: Work Experience: 1996 - Present 1991-1996 1990 . 1991 1998 -1990 1983 - 1987 .,'.' Philip K. Charalel 26 Hilhop Road Congers, NY 10920 (914) 2687440 Master of Science in Electrical Engineering, 1995 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering, 1983.. Bangalore University, BangaJore, India Sr, RF Engineer, Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Responsible for the Radio Frequency(RF) Design of Cellular System in the Queens, Suffolk and Nassau counties which includes: · IdentifY new cellular sites · RF Design of new sites · Re-Design of old sites · System optimization · Implementation of new technologies · Train Associate Engineers · TestifY as RF Expert in Zoning !fown bearings Manager System Design, Bell Atlantic Mobile Responsible for the RF Engineering activities oftbc COlUlccticut and Western MA region which in~ludes: · Supervise RF Engineers and coordinate their activities · Implement new tcchnologies · TestifY as RF Expert in Zoning /Town bearings RF Engineer, Metrophone, Philadelphia Responsible for the following activities in the Philadelphia region · Frequency planning · cen site selection · FCC filing · System trouble shooting · Traffic engineering . Systems Engineer, Metronet Communication, Bryn Mawr, PA Major responsibilities include system design of Microwave links for telecommunication application and Cable TV system design RF Design Engineer, Keltron, India Worked as team leader in the development of satellite communication receivers and CCTV cameras . . APPENDIX C . FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP. INC. . . PhotOl!raDh No.1: View looking east along Main Road just west of Platt Road approximately 900 feet from the proposed monopole site. ~ FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP. INC. . . Photol!raph No.2: View of existing monopole recently constructed in East Mattituck. Note that the monopole "blends" with the overhead lines and street trees. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. I . . :~""l" ".:}t.~.'.'" . . ,.}3"'\'{-".-:;_: ''-" _ ," 0', _. "'~_'/~_:;:;> :. ',-:,;, -'- Photol!raDh No.3: Photograph taken along Elijah's Lane approximately 800 feet north of the monopole. Utility poles, overhead lines and the monopole are visible in the horizon. The monopole is no more evident than the other utility poles. I ICI - -- - -- Photol!I'aoh No.4: View looking north from Suffolk Avenue just west of its intersection with Locust Avenue approximately 2,200 feet from the monopole in East Mattituck. Farmland is in the foreground with vineyards and trees in the background. The monopole can be observed in the horizon above the tree line. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC, . I .. - - ....J . Photoe:raDh No.5: View 100kiDg northwest from Suffolk A venue 500 feet east of Locust A venue approximately 2,700 feet from the monopole. Farmland and snow fencing are in the foreground with utility poles, overhead wires and trees in the background. The monopole is no more evident than a utility pole. . Photoe:raDh No.6: View looking west along Main Road just east of its intersection with Locust Avenue approximately 1,000 feet from the monopole in East Mattituck. The road, utility poles, overhead wires and trees are in the foreground with houses, utility poles, overhead wires and trees in the background. The monopole blends with the utility poles, overhead wires and trees. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. . . . Photol!raph No.7: The same view as in Photograph No. 6 except the photographer is approximately 20 feet further to the east on Main Road. The tree in the foreground blocks the view of the monopole. . Photol!raDh No.8: View from Main Road looking east approximately 4,000 feet from the subject site. Street and yard trees as well as utility poles and overhead wires are evident on both sides of the road. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. - . j I I I . Photol!raph No.9: View looking east from just west of Tabor Road. The subject site is approximately 2,000 feet away. Municipal buildings and trees obstruct the line-of-sight toward the proposed monopole location. Utility poles and power lines are also visible along the roadway. -:::--- , .-......--..:... Photol!raph No. 10: View looking southwest along Main Road about 3,000 feet from the subject property. The road, utility poles, overhead wires and farm fields are in the foreground while trees and buildings are in the background. The monopole would be able to be seen in the horizon but would blend with the trees. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. . . APPENDIX D t FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP. INC. . . . View Point 1 - "Monopole", #24805 Main Road, North Side Of Main Road 590' East Of Platt Road, Looking To The Southeast Computer Simulated Photo By Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. . . View Point 2 - "Monopole", #380 Platt Road, West Side Of Platt Road 526' From Main Road, Looking To The Southeast -- - ~ r~'>. '.."l"~ I t IIIIIII~ __ ... ~{tfI I .. I - ~ J Computer Simulated Photo By Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. . t APPENDIX E FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP. INC. -.... . . View Point 1 - "Silo Tower", #24805 Main Road, North Side Of Main Road 590' East Of Platt Road, Looking To The Southeast Computer Simulated Photo By Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. . . View Point 2 - "Silo Tower", #380 Platt Road, West Side Of Platt Road 526' From Main Road, Looking To The Southeast ";i.;<,...~ - .. = == :; ,~ .. .. .. Computer Simulated Photo By Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. . . . View Point 1 - "Bell Tower", #24805 Main Road, North Side Of Main Road 590' East Of Platt Road, Looking To The Southeast Computer Simulated Photo By Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. .. . . . View Point 2 - "Bell Tower", #380 Platt Road, West Side Of Platt Road 526' From Main Road, Looking To The Southeast - - .......- ,>>#:Iiif~~ ". . ~"'. ;;. "':-' f~ " 1':. ~ql~:" " ~ . ~:f' '.J'"' .\I. ',' "if"~~' ,~:~, - ,if"'rtid.';'i:~~~,.." ........ K':;:;-!" -~ "'. . 'l<r~~~; I -- ir II". i Computer Simulated Photo By Creative Visuals, Inc. & Virtually Real, Inc. .. - APPENDIX F . FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. . YnLL~J.CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATiL'u"I, JR RICHARD G. WARD ':.:...-....._7~ /~~~fFaL.t ;;-~ /s:.".; ~." y~ ~-:. ~::I ~: to . . en :iI:~ . ~ !'t1;j .~(::). ~'f ':.. +'" ~:'t- v -,,:'f().[ + ....~ ",y "?o- l'~.......y ~- Town Hall. 53095 ~ain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 pLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. Chairman pLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ... - MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: Judith Terry, Town Clerk Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner FOIL Request: Pachman, Pachman & Brown Date: May 27,1997 . As per Mr. Pachman's request of May 19,1997, attached are copies of "resolutions, decisions, and/or determinations by the Town of Southold Planning Board with respect to the New York State Environmental auality Review Act (SEaRA)", "and all Planning Department and consultants' recommendations, memorandum, reports, or other writings with respect thereto."... (SEaRA) (emphasis added) - . Metro One Tower - Mattituck SCTM# 1000-108-4-11.3 . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards j)(jO.0f/::~:' '\~...... :? .:;~:. ~.--;".~:~;. ?-. :~ - r.., ~:,i.. ~ ~. .-0. -. . .~ ,.:~, ~~..~.,~._::;'~(', $ ~.: _-/, ,,--...~....t"~. ~-;;'~?j ':~. ~...;;:.> ,"\ ~,~...,-,-..:::;,. SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 15, 1992 - William D. Moore Moore & Moore P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Cellular One d/b/a Metro One, Mattituck SCTM*1000-108-4-11.3 Dear Mr. Moore: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 14, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. WHEREAS, William Baxter, Jr. is the owner of the property known and designated as Cellular Telephone Co. d/b/a Metro One SCTM*lOOO-108-4-11.3, located at Route 25 and Elijah's Lane, Mattituck; and . WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was completed on September 30, 1992,; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on December 14, 1992; and WHEREAS, an interpretation and variance were granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on August 18, 1992; and . pdge 2 Cellular One d/b/a Metro One WHEREAS, all the requirements of the site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; Be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the final survey last revised on October 19, 1992, subject to Certification by the Princip~l Building Inspector. This condition must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution. . Please contact this office if you have any further questions. very truly yours, ~~)k/~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman . ',l.... '0':; ., . ,,~(JF!7:: :~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski.. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards .- ~y- (}"" . "5." " .... " t" . ~ '. '.' }~;; ~~.<.\t ~. .-:> .'.... ........... >. " '.. --,...'.<.,....:.;;, 'J- .~' " ,-.. i":-. -.';; .... ';;P ...",. :.~ .-;.~, ."';,~--~~.. '~:....",:" ..~ ."1.1),. .,.,"..... ~_.... .. '1 ,'.,.',' -:::~~';~~::::::-;> ,~ SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 . November 2, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Cellular One d/b/a Metro One SCTMll: Location: 1000-108-4-11.3 Elijah's Lane and State Route 25 SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( X) No ( ) . Description of Action: Reuse of existing one story block building for use as unmanned te.1ecommunications equipment room and construction of 100 foot high monopole antenna. ',; ~. . Page 2 Cellular One d/b/a Metro One SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reasons Supporting This Determination: This project involves the construction of a 100 foot high monopole antenna and reuse of existing block building for use as a communications room. The applicant has received a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals for the use and height of the antenna, thus.the proposed action is consistent with zoning. - ... The app1icant has complied with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Code, having obtained an exception due to the fact there will be no water supply or sewage disposal facilities on the premises. An environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board, P.O. Box 1179, Main Road, Southold Telephone Number: (516) 7.65-1938 . cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYS DEC Commissioner, Albany Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Building Department Board of Appeals Applicant ~.. ., . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S, McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards / <:,IlHGLk "~ &~... t'~ '\ ji;":'~ . ".,''3i,,~ ~" ,--. ,.iIO ',;:-<' ;cC-, ' :-~ , en ;;"', "" N ,\"""",,:, r>-t,t{ (:;) .~:.. ~v 1:", ~"" iY ~'/}.L :.:.;.. i-~,f;Y' ~" scon L. HARRI" Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 MaIO Road P,O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Tdephonc (Slhl 7h5.1~3R PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTH OLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 2, 1992 .- .... ... RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: , 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Cellular Telephone Co., d/b/a Metro One . Requested Action: To erect a 100' (102') mono ole and latform a Jacent to an e~~sting 724 sq. ft. concrete block bldg on a 1.848 ac lot in the Limited Business District located on the w/ s of ELij,ah's La. 299' n/o S.R. 25 in Mattituck. SCTM#1000~108-4- SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( X ) unlisted Contact Person: Valerie Scopaz (516)-765-1938 . The lead agency will determine the impact statement (EIS) on this project. the date of this letter, please respond have an interest in being lead agency. need for an environmental Within thirty (30) days of in writing whether or not you Planning Board Position: (x) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( Other. ( See comments below). ~ ~ Comments: The site is bordered on the west and north by residentially zoned lots; on the east by Elijah's La. and beyond residen~ial lots' and to the south by two limited business zoned lots ~n the ~ame ownership as the subject property. The "fall radius" of the monopole will result in a restriction being placed on part of the adjoining lot to the south which would prohibit any construction within the fall radius. Refer to the attached site plan for more information. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, ~ ~~~9 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. AJ Chairman f . cc: Board of Appeals 13oard4:lf-Trustees .... ~ Building' Department ~~ho-bd~own-Board Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services -wi5DEe---5tony-Brcrok - ~ NYSDEC - Albany $. C. Dep~.-of-CpubHc-Works- -ll.s-.--Army-Corp -of--Engineers- N.Y.S. Dept. of Transportation * Maps are enclosed for your.~eview Coordinating agencies . ft q-~ '" '.w. YORK STATE DErARrMENT OF ENVIRONMENtAL i . DIVISION Of RECULATORY AHAIR$ ,.,,,.. , 'I PROJECT i.o. HUM. .ER.. iERVATION ' .. ...... . , ~ : 51. Ie Envlronment.1 Quellly Fle.law SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I Prolectlnlormatlon (To be completod by Applicant or Prolect sponsor) 1. Appllun"tpon,Of 1. Protect Nam. 3. Projec.t location: Municipality Town of Southold County Suffolk .. It p~o'il!d action: W Ne.... 0 bpa",IOll o Modiflcatlon/alleutla" J. Dil!lcribe p'olect briefly: Reconstruction'of existing one story concrete block bUilding for use ,as unmanned telecommunications equipment room and construction of 104 foot high monopole antenna - - t. ru'che locUlort {,oad ,",eneetlon,. promm."' laltd",..ks. etc. 0' provide map. Northwest corner of intersection p.f~. Lane--and State Route 25 Suffolk County Tax Map i1000-108f4-11.3 J . ~ 7. A",O\lnt 0' land .ffe~ed: . Init!.lI., acre, Ulllm.ll!ly 2 .ere. 8. Will pfopo'ed action comply with ed.Une lonln, Of other e.bllnc land ".. reslrlctlond eg Ye, 0 No II No. d,.cribil! brieny , 9. Whit It preu'", land ute in vicinity 01 pfOlectl ua R.,id.nll.1 0 l"duII'..' iii Commfl'ci.l Describe: South of proposed sit~ pred0minantly agricultural Abandoned auto repair shop abuts premise~ IiI ^.rlcullure o ,.,....nd'orf'n .p.c. Oath... ase 10 OOil!f .(lion in...ol"'il! . pil!rrnit/.PPfOV.1. or fun Inl. now G' ultlma<<..ly. from .ny othil!r .owmment.' .....ncy Ifede,..I. st.te or Kl YiPt 0 No If yu. 11,. ..t'ftq(tJ and permit/.ppro....." Southold Town Planning Board - Site Plan SUffolk County Planning .c. c. 11. Do.' any .fIIpect of the action h..... . <,,"eft II, ".Iid pfl'mil or apptovaU o Yu E9 No If ye'. lilt .I~ n...... .nd permit/apinonl tw- ..._b~- - aij,---"''''' . 11. At ,...tull 01 pfop("...d action _ii' exittln, pe,mlt/.lppto.....' requlr. modlflcaUon' o Y.. OJ N. " I CERTIFY TfIAT nil INFORMATION rROVIDEO ABOVE IS TRUE TO TUl 8EST OF MY kNOWLEDCE .' -~.. Oalr. :>-:>1 '~'1 Slln.uur,,: ant :...~' ~...::::.;Tl' ',:;;r-.;.-;';J".,. " the acllon Is In Ihe Coaslal AroA, and you are a state agency, complete .the Coaslal Assessment Form bo/ore proceeding with this asseasment OVEn . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards "'p~/>-:.",- f;;:,..;j '~\\fra' y.,~ .(J <\.;)U (,'1'" "" '<,,,v. ~,., "" ..", ~v ,......,% ~ :i,::s ['~~'" -;!- " ":/:::J \0;-:;:: " ~~, '.'~ ~ ~ ;'1 ~ ~,.;,-,,~~~..:::; ...., t ,,..:;::.:";~~ 2': \: '> ~. ,1...i.C-:"'" ~~ ~,~~ (~.':'~ ~} ..... ." ~1 '~-:-'!..~ <'...t- .; r "'-':"'!}j .:; ,\~v.~:; '":"~_' .....1- .:c--l...'-" ~~~ \ SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 N(wember 4, 1992 William D. Moore . Moore & Moore 'P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Site plan for Cellular One d/b/a Metro One SCTMilOOO-108-4-11.3 Dear Mr. Moore:' The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 2, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town' planning Board acting. under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, start the coordination process on this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. . Very truly yours, ~ ~,cJ?/rs Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ' Chairman . .+ "s,t, -~ . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards ":':-',~. . ,c>;:.\fFO{ ,;~',,", r1r'~\) '1/')~ ,y'~ c"', .~ "-. ///~ '. -:",/,.~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ i ~. ""~;'. ~ ~.(, c, ;;:~ f"..,;'f ;., ~ ~ .~ ;#\' "'f~,' ~}i 'A OJ . ..>. .,;:,;-- ~ ,'j '..... "X~~'"'-""" ~'Y- ('.I ~'~"'J'), ,".';;,"'. .-:-~ .........,r ~1 -;.. _~. --':-~~~.:;.::...;:..'- scon L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765,1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMuRANDUM FROM: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman o.o.tjv,jIS Cellular Telephone Co. d/b/a Metro One SCTM * 1090-108-4-11.3 July 22, 1992 TO: . RE: DATE: In response to your recent request input, we have reviewe& the site plan. follows: for Planning Board Our comments are as The Planning Board is concerned about the aesthetic impact of the monopole on the residential neighborhood to the north. Also, the site plan is missing some required information. These elements of concern will be addressed during the Planning Board's environmental and site plan review. . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards " u::,.... .~.'.~'::>-:-.. .,):;-;iffiJl'r"~ .." ~;)U .. /I - {Y ,,"\; ~""" ....-?_'^'''' ;./~...,:::~ ""':~'..":.' ~~.~ & - . I..... . ~~. -- L-.." - ':\ . 0 ": ;:~:_-'1Ti'~~ . ~ tl cr.J ':-:,' '::-.;,~~' ==,~ ~~ .' \.,.;:'!iT:" !:!:J0 t. ~.. .'-'). .~": ~:J '\.'/' ..~ <:)...... (/ <!:~:-~lx.,~~~') SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 SOUlhold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July 22, 1992 - .... william D. Moore Moore & Moore 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Cellular Telephone d/b/a Metro One Wls Elijah's La., 299' N/o SR 25, Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM ~ 1000-108-4-11.3 Dear Mr. Moore: . Our review of the above-noted site plan application shows that this application is incomplete, meaning that the site plan is missing information required by the Site Plan ordinance, and it states incorrect information. A revised set of plans are needed before the Planning Board can proceed with its review. The following list is intended to assist you in completing the application: 1. The site plans must be at the 1" = 20' scale. 2.- An elevation drawing of the proposed facades of the concrete block building is needed. The drawing should indicate exterior colors and materials for the sides and the roof. 3. A screening and landscaping plan is needed. This plan must show how the concrete block building and the tower base will be screened from view of the adjoining residences to the north. Further, Section 213 of the Zoning Code requires a twenty foot buffer between the Light Business and residential zones. 4. Parking calculations and correct dimensions of spaces shall be shown. The minimum allowed dimensions for a standard parking space is nine (9) by nineteen (19). . A handicapped space in accordance with the requirements of the American Disabilities Act is required also. 5. Indicate on the site plan the radius within which the tower may fall. 6. A sketch of any proposed sign and its location should be included with the revised site plan. 7. The required front yard setback is 60', not 3cr'. The required side yard setbacks are 20' and 25' . 8. Show the location, type and wattage of proposed outdoor security lighting on the revised site plan. All lighting must be designed so that light does not shine off the site. Pole heights of a maximum of twelve (12) feet are preferred. - - 9. The proposed use of the existing barn Upon receipt of all of the above-noted information and i'tems the environmental review will start. Sincerely, ~~'f--I/s Bennett Orlowski, ,Jr. Chairman cc: Zoning Board of Appeals Building Department . ~"<!;..,.. . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards , " \ " . . " ~..~ ( \;;: I - /. - SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor ._~. -. Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman oy.ty.lJs MAY 9, 1991 DATE: - RE: Metro One SCTM~ 1000-108-4-11.3 The Planning Board is not in favor of granting the special exception for the radio tower for Metro One. This property is surrounded by residential zones and dwellings (see attached zoning map). The Board believes that the social, economic and aesthetic benefits of the residential area will be compromised by the granting of this special exception. The Board would recommend alternate locations for the tower in a Business zoned or Industrial zoned district, or at the Landfill site. . . .~1JjMR~'.':('. . . :-... -80 ~ '-' ". . ''-,., ...r... / ; . ~ "'V I .-! J;,~ 1 ; ~>:::--'-"i~4 I ~ ,~ -:2J .~~7J:! fiR ~ . c: . (~ ... 1/ 1'-< I J : "- h:=: CJ.. 2. ~~.".j7T/~/ 'R-8'--J ,A-C ['~ ~ l ~ . 1f1 ;fjjl~Hib~, ' ~, ~ fj~J{fJ :,/~;J?I \.j'- '~;-Jl'~. ' ;. ~ '::'iLV::~ U :...~--7~ ;", I ~. Ad LC 1 . I Il-~ ~ l ~. Il. R R-80 II; /../0 -- ~ 'd"'~ = H8~~'. 7\ -~ I '::-'1-- I i \ i ....., ~~iii [if', ~'i: \ I '; R-ao ;;j~ I I ~! I \ ~ .1 JUT!. t- Fi, im / I I '~:::. I ' i ~ . I r "/I.,~ !\. 7'"" ff..,J,,~ . rLBJ.. jl I :: ; I i ...R'/~~::;~' "'~~~I ,/ =,_ . rl i. \ ~ ,i&-..if ~,>--~, ( >-~ !i!'~ \. u n A-C J71i~ "V, ~....,.' " . . \. / R s:l \ ~ /1 . V ~ .. ,4" ". ""'- ~ ~ .' 1i(~~L' -.; (" ~ ~ _l ~-~J:o... '. ,6_1 ;; .,,~ \ . -/:,..'if/u /. ~~ -Jh) r.:17~~ T~-"'1 -80 ~ ~~D,.~ J / .....~ , 'I.',' ...~.,. I HJ k ~ I;' rJfri .... ~~ .,tCi '~ .;::::'/ F'i ';'~<:l . . r <. ~ iIdli/lfto. Wt j' ,,---'j ... .. _( .#~' i' . ~} . ,~~f' f I 'C 0 'R-'-IO i {<-:SD ",?;;1I'5<:i~c:tS' ~ ~~ ~Ii '~ ~, I J A -c.. ZD'1;~5 d.stnc.r '-<. '/ '" ~ '~ .~ ~~ff:A . ('~ "- ---<~ :::"""~~..,, ~ .__ r..':'X/! .~. .._._..T."'..,/.~ ~--'.~~ ... i , i , . w : , , .~f"O" , , ! '~ u '~J I " I , , I i , I I i , l I I i l I I i I .\ I \ ~-;...' Lj I - . I __ ': -.- ; - r mn m 111 I f--' J. ...J . I If-' \ \ \ L- P- J~ c- E it \\ . -----=-=:~--=:-+---,'1:-~'- :"-_:___.L_~~-_-_ -'''-~-~--- ~-~-~_.---.- '--~l ---1'--'-"'-~'--1--' '----~.__+___.f_ ,-..----t-.. -+- --- -~~-- :T!-.-----;---" , i i i ~~ ffi, ~ i i ~" , :: $1'111 : . ! ! i!!: 1 , , I I I f I I I I , , I, I I , , ' I I I , , , I, , : ! - , , , i I, , ' : ' : : I ,: i i i I i!! ' : I' I ' !. :, 'i i; I; I I .. , i I ill i i , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I' I , ,.... ii~: ,<1 I, I - i I I , i I! I i I, , , I' i I :--t , II i I I i , , , , , , , , , , I!I~ : ; , : , ; , i , , , , , , , , ~ : il , I I I I' , , , i i , , , , , , " I , , I ' , , , " I I I I I , , , ' ! ! 'I I I' , , , , , , " , , , , , ~-~. " , , , , , , II, : I:: " I: I i I I , I , , ' , , ! , , , , , , ' i , , : ! , , : , , , , , , , I , , , , , , , '. 'i I , ; I' :!~I i i ! ! I " I , I' ! 1,1 I : : I ~ ,! i "I i , , , 111 , , , , i I , I 111 , , '--'--, i , , : , : , , I i' " , , , i , : , I I: I 1 I : , I , , , ' " , , ~ : : ! , I' I I ,! I , , , . , I : ! , , , " , , , ' : ' , , , , , , I I I , , ! I , , , i , 1 i I ~-:: : i Iii , , v~ , , I: I: I I , , : ! , , " , , I' , , -\A- : : I : 1, " : I ~ i!' j' , , , : , , , , + , , , i , ~ ~ ~ , ' , , , ~ I 1_ i- j L -~i--- ,_.------------~---~-----~ I 1,1 , I I, , , , , , , , , , ! I, , , , , >---.- " ' I i I , , , , , , , I! , , , , , ' I I ' Ii: , ! , , , , , , , ' , " , ~. ~;, , ' , , , I , I I I I , I I I , , : , , I , , , , , I , : , I I , : it I , , i! , I , I 1 I , , , , I! ; III I , , L I I I! ,I I' Lll I I , , , I LL+ i _LL.L IL.LLL i I IT[ 11 ,ei 1, rl......L. , I I II I 11 I I L IT-: L lJI I !. I I ! r i I I, f! [Ji j I-I i ..ITI \ II I Ii -! f I [J : I I I 1-1-- (_I I I ! II .111., -.LLi -'-1 I , I I ! : I! : " I .-t--, I: i "f 11 I, I I I ~ 11 T : ,-!- 'I, 'TL i ! ' , I I' , , , , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards .~---~- -;::-..... .' ~ - . ',,; .....~ /;,~;"jC:3t;;li\ - '-:\:. -'~';~' - J ~.:~^ '."n>~c.t;.y . .~-~-:.~_._~:.:..:...../ SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soulhold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 4, 1991 - - william D. Moore, Attorney at Law Clause Commons Suite 3 Main Road P~O. Box 23 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Metro One site plan SCTMi 1000-108-4-11.3 Dear Mr. Moore: The planning Board has been notified of your application to the Board of Appeals for a Special Exception for a radio transmission tower with antenna and unmanned computer run equipment in an existing concrete block building. . Until the Board of Appeals acts on your Special Exception request, the Planning Board must consider your application incomplete for the purpose of a SEQRA review. The Board will review other items in your site plan application simultaneously with the Board of Appeals review to insure the timely processing of your application. If you have any ques1;.ions, or require further assistance' please contact this office. Very truly yours, 3~~;4~ Bennett Orlowski Jr. ;fr/~ Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals . Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - Mattituck SeTM# 1000-141-3-34 . . V\'1LLL\.M .J. CREMERS KE:-<'CiETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE L-\.THA.\I. JR. RICHARD G. WARD l{)\Vn Hall. 53095 :..Iain Road P.O. Sox 1179 Souchold. ~ew York 119'i1 Fa.,,<: t516i 765-:3136 Telephone 1.516) 76.5-1938 PLANNING BOARD ME:'iIBERS 8 ECiCi=:TT 0 RLOWSKl. .JR. Chui nnan PLA.........~.H:-;G BOARD OFFICE TOW");, OF SOUTHOLD May 27, 1997 Richard Weyhreter Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc. 60 Herricks Road Mineola, NY 11501 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Telecommunications Tower Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, Inc. 425 Westphalia Avenue, Mattituck SCTM # 1000-141-3-34 . Dear Mr. Weyhreter: The Planning Board has reviewed the above-noted application and finds that if needs the following items before proceeding with it: a completed long environmental assessment form drainage calculations for the proposed structure and any impervious areas that may be added Upon receipt of the above-noted items we will proceed with the environmental review. You will be notified of the environmental review fee after the long EAF has been received. Finally, you should be aware that the Town adopted a 120 day moratorium . (effective May 19th) which prohibits the issuance of permits or final approvals for telecommunication towers during the 120 day period. The moratorium need not affect the processing of the NYNEX application, but if the review during the moratorium results in a revision of the codes affecting the telecommunication towers, the Planning Board will have to re-evaluate your application in accordance with the new regulations. If necessary, additional review fees may levied to cover our expenses. If you would prefer to hold up review until the regulations are clarified, we would be willing to honor your request. Unless you notify us in writing otherNise, the Planning Board office will continue to process your application under the provisions of the existing regulations. > . Page 2 Site Plan for NYNEX 0 Mattrtuck May 27,1997 If there are any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, /" , \' Ip.v~ ~ Valerie Scopaz Town Planner cc: Howard E. Pachman, Esq. Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals . ..,i~ ,.'. o' ". . Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19 . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman Georg.e Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward :VI ark S. McDonald Kenne.h L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Sou.hold. New York 1197\ Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 25, 1992 Marie ongioni, Attorney at Law 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 Re: Amendment to Site plan of Arthur V. Junge, Inc. for NYNEX Mobile Communications MIs CR 48 Cutchogue, New York SCTM 1000-96-1-19 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, Februay 24, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED That the southold'ToWn Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, as the lead agency makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration for the amended site plan of Arthur V. Junge Inc. for NYNEX Mobile Communications, last revised on July 31, 1991, signed by Richard E. Tangel, Licensed Engineer, and received in this office on September 13, 1991. . A copy of the Negative Declaration is enclosed for your records. ~-. Please submit a copy of the site plan with Health Department approval (or waiver) so that we may proceed with your site plan. Sincerely, ~/l-VYt-Vtr tf2d~~ 'Jv'/KS- Bennett Orlowski, Jr. .' Chairman . PLANNING BOARD MH1BERS Bennen Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOlT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Tdephone 1516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental QUality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance February 24, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental QUality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Amended Site Plan of Arthur V. Junge Inc. (Industrial Building) for NYNEX Mobile Communications Co. . SCTMl\: 1000-9"6-1-19 ,. Location: North side of CR 48, approximately 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue, New York SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (x) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (x) . Page 2. Negative Declaration Southold Planning Board Description of Action: To construct a monopole one hundred (100') in height, for the purpose of installing a cellular communications transmitter; and to construct an unmanned, pre-fabricated accessory service building whose dimensions will be 12' by 26'. This communications facility will inhabit the same premises as an existing industrial building that is 110' by 40' in size. Reasons supporting This Determination: No correspondence has been received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's Stony Brook office. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. No correspondence has been received from the Department of Health Services. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. No correspondence has been received from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. It should be noted that the Zoning Board has issued variances for reduction in the rear: and side yard setbacks and for an increase in the maximum allowed height for the tower, and has issued a Special Exception for the public utility use. . The Planning Board finds that the potential environmental impacts of the proposed construction are not significant. (The potential impacts of the proposed project also were reviewed by our environmental consultant in a report dated February 3, 1992. "This report has been considered by this Board in making this determination of a Negative Declaration.) The Board's findings are supported by the following information. 1. The site lies within a large Light Industrial zone, and is adjacent to the Town's landfill. The proposed use is approriate to this zoning district. 2. While there are two non-conforming residential dwellings to the west of the site, the view of the new building and tower will be partially screened by additional landscaping that will be planted to the west of the monopole. 3. Since the site will be unmanned, there will be no noticeable increase in vehicular traffic to and from the site as a whole. . Page 3. Negative Declaration Southold Town Planning Board 4. The anticipated radio emissions from the antennae appear to be within the Radiation Hazard Standards of the occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). For Further Information: Contact Person: Valerie Scopaz Address: Southold Town planning Board P.O. Box 1179, Southold, N.Y. 11952 Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Commissioner Jorling, NYSDEC, Albany Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town Building Department southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Cramer, voorhis & Associates, Inc. Applicant: NYNEX Mobile Communications c/o Ongioni Property Owner: Arthur Junge . ,. . ,_t, J' ',/.- i{(- /~.":'\;'f/.\: CRAMER, vd@~'is ~fA'SSOCIATES ENV1RONMENT~M>AP\I:;'~t-lG CONSULTANTS " '.yJir--\~,\ February 3, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review ofEAF for NYNEX Mobile Communications SCTM No. 1000-96-1-19 -----.:.::......:. . -. . . .- - . . .- \1 \ill J < " ,. :,' .., --,--'---' , -~~ - ;; 'c.eo r:o ... 1= SOOfilOlP TOWN PUNNING BOARD Dear Benny: We are in receipt of your authorization to complete the review of the above referenced project. At this time we have field inspected the site, reviewed the Short EAF, reviewed information concerning the ZBA decision, and obtained a significant amount of additional information concerning radio emissions as regards the above project. The project involves the construction of a 100 foot high cellular communications transmitter tower, and an accessory equipment storage builamg, on an existing industrial use site. The project is an Unlisted Action, and a Short EAF has been submitted ror review and coordination purposes. The subject site is located in a portion of Southold Town zoned exclusively for industrial purposes, under the U (tight Industrial. District). The U District lies north of CR 48, west of Cox Lane and south of Oregon Road. Westof the U district is an area zoned for tight Industrial/Office Park (UO District), which extends west to Depot Road. This industrial hub represents the largest area of industrial zoned land in the Town. In terms of land use, the Southold Town landfill is immediately north of the site. The site itself has an existing building with several nses including: mechanical systems, car repair and a catering business. East of the site is a new building which provides space to contractors. West of the site are several non-conforming residential homes, within the indt:Stricl distric<_ . . There are few natural environmental resources associated with the site. Specimen trees are present in front of the building. The tower is proposed in the northeast corner of the site where nearly' all vegetation has been removed. The proposal involves construction of the tower and buildin~, with installation of evergreen landscape plantings. The proposed use will not significantly Increase traffic, parking requirements, or intensity of use of the site as it is physically unmanned. ' The Zoning Board of Appeals has issued a height variance for the proposed structure, with a number of conditions and special considerations. The ability of the structure to withstand wind stresses was considered and found to be acceptable. The use must operate in accordance with Public Service Commission (PSC) and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations and 1lirnitations on the wattage of such facilities. The Page 1 . 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 NYNEX & Arthur V. Junge Short EAF Review Zoning Board compared the proposed use to their mandated considerations, and found the use would be compatible with surroundings as well as the intent of the code. For the purpose of the Planning Board review, additional information concerning the radio emissions of cellular communications transmitters was obtained. This includes an Engineering Report, prepared by Charger Tech Services, Inc. (New Rochelle, NY) dated December 3, 1991, for installation of a cellular radio telephone system in Greenport. This report compares radio emissions of cellular transmitters to applicable standards. Radiation Hazard Standards are noted as follows: the . OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) 10 milliwatts/cm squared ANSI (American National Standards Institute) 2.6 milliwatts/cm squared Massachusetts Standard (Indefinite Code of Exposure) 500 microwatts/cm squared Extensive computations found that radio emissions from the antennae never even remotely approached the OSHA or ANSI standards for such emissions. Computations did find that a person within 23 feet of the antennae would encounter a field equal to the Massachusetts Indefinite Code of Exposure of 500 microwatts/cm squared. Review of the NYNEx, Cutchogue site plan finds that the location of the antennae is such that no receptors would be expected within this setback. For the Greenport site it was recommended that the power to the antennae be switched off during maintenance procedures. An additional correspondence was obtained, pertaining to the effect of Electromagnetic Interference on a pacemaker system. 1bis included a letter from C.~diac Pacemakers, Inc. to Charger Tech Services, Inc. dated December 6, 1991. The letter clearly states that microwave ovens and cellular telephones have been found not to interfere with modem pacemaker designs. Based upon these additional findings, we re-affirm that the proposed cellular communications transmitter does not pose a significant adverse environmental health effect to the community. The following facts are provided in support of a Negative Declaration on the proposed project: . There are no significant environmental resources on the site. The site plan calls for pro~osed revegetation of landscape species. The use Will not cause an Increased intensity ofland use. The Zoning Board of Ap~eals has found that the hei2ht variance is consistent with the intent of the zOning and is compatible with me surrounding community. There are no confirmed or suspected adverse environmental health concerns associated with the operation of a cellular communications transmitter on the subject property. Since a Short EAF has been completed for this project, it is recommended that this form be utilized as a Determination of Significance. This form has been designed to meet the H.O.M.E.S. Case Law test for minimum "hard look" environmental review of an action. This letter should be made available to Board members and should be included in the ~l 5) CRAMER, V~R~\$. ~\SOCIATES ENV1RONMENTA~ANn:%~~G CONSULTANTS Page 2 . NYNEX & Arthur V. Junge Short EAF Review deliberation of the Determination of Signficance. Based upon this review, if the Board is in agreement, it is recommended that the Board adopt a Negative Declaration by resolution, with reference to the Determination of Significance section of the Short EAF and this letter. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input on this project. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. ~ . ~-'::~A~! CRAMER. VOORHl~ ~)f OCIATES ENVIRONMENTA~.A!II~'~ ' NG CONSULTANTS ~ "Vtlll '.~\\ Page 3 . ; ---.,./- c__'_.... -1' lS-lI,.q"P1A, fI ~Jl.ffi NEW ~ORl(' STATE OErARIA..tfNr nr f.p.IVIR0NM(NP,l CONHRV""0N OIVl~ION Of A(GUIAfORY Arr"IR~ rROI€CT 10 N\)M8U Sle.e Envlronmenl.' auellly R..few SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I Pmlect In'O""elt~n (To be completed by Applicant 0' P'oject .pon.o<) 1 Aoph<.ntlf00f'l1C1f NYNEX Mobile Communications P'OI~(t N.m.. Mobile Communications ) PIOI..~1 I"'c:.uion "l\.",~io.lity Cutchogue-21855 Cty.Rd. 48 County Suffolk '" It p'"po,_f '(IIOft" rx.J Nf'W 0 EJloan"on o Modiflca,k)fU,lt."li"n O.'CtlM tHG,"CI h,tef1y. Construct building foundation for pre-fabricated communications equipment. (;aN57'f2Uc.r 100 Foor 7Qw= A,V() fRO >/1 (J" SIn?" LAN-oSCAPINv' building to house C6l..l.uL.A.R COM).! Uv I u(-;,o.vS, 4 "t..e.t. I""""," lrC'.d 1"'.''''(110"'. prOmin..nt landm.,tu, .IC or provld. "'apf See Suffolk County Tax Map 5<::TI'1 N.J. IOOO-"Ii:;-i-,q; photostat '-VS OF attached. Cou v-ry Ro<.J~ .; B CUT7:.1+O vilC"" I NY' 7 "",,",unt nl l.and 'fhct~.03 Be r,e".s, . 0 3 Be res The to ta 1 area 0 t pa reel 15 1".f1allV'.. ~ Ultlmatel., AC'''' 1 . 0 4 a ere 5 SWill tt,n,,.,,,.-d "~tn '"""'pl., .....'h ...utln. IOftln. or olhH ....,"n. land u.. 'enne,t"n" IIc71CN,S PI?OIJOSetJ 1;\,,/ /f/V L:J:: Zo: ~ o Y.., U No II Nn d..,cnbot b",.fl., /1t:71CN .e6'Z< vlnC(J f1.. ft'7:;? 6Hr VMIAAJ(c JJ',JIC W,;..ucY2-.~ ZB-4 15~"~-o ,ft:,,,,,., VM,IlNL-.!- IN f9,0Poh. vNa;ra4n~ 'iOs-'i3 tJ~ NOVI::"rl,'= 2..1, 1'1, 1 Set back requirements requ~re a ,fv7l~1 'Z1/v'6 I'fvN<) f'I'f...C, , whit I~ f'I,..~..."t Ilnd U.'" .n "'Cln.tV "" pn"ectI [J A...wh'n1iAI (] Inrluunal [] Cnmm"'cill fl..,,{,,~ (XI A,'lcuhll'" Or..,.'.."......".." ,pIC. 001"'" 10 0.-" Ic"n" Ntv"",... a r;..,m't/altt"Ct'It.I. or fundi".. """'" Gt' ulhml''''". """' artY nth., sm..,""'",t.' .s'!n'" Ih.....'.I. Itlte Of Ior.lm rJ h. n Nit " y..,. Ii,t ."nC\(.1 and ~rmtt/lOOfov.l. ~ ,"'~ .. o &@ ~ H:W ~ G: I . 11 OCM" AnV' UpH:t of tn. .ctto.. hn'. I CUff...ll., v.tact IMrmil or IttPfGYIII.' o v.., m NO If Y.'. 'It. I'flfq' "1m. .... ~rmttf.""""'.1 tYP'f !:CJ ' ,,_, I' i:.~:~j- 1,' 11 .... ,..",It of propo,1'd .Cllnn ..11 "''''m, perm't/approval ,~u". mGdiflclttot., [] r., KJ N. SOUTHO OAIlO " Ih. ectlon I. 'n Ih. Co..I.. Are., .nd you u. . .1.,. . . Coul.. A.....m.nt Form b1lfore proe...dlno wllh th . I CfRftFY TItAT THE INFOJtMATlO,.4 rROVlDfOlBOVE IS tRUE fO tHE BESr OF MY KNOWUOCE o..~ ~!JA @Rn~Thw\ \ \!; U '\ I ' : \ ~ U\ Communications ADolic"n'Jloon,Gt' r: SilnatU'f!' [ ~J. .__' _ :; 'c.ell. d\. . ._" '" _....... 1\ .' er. eompl.'. Ih. .... 0; 0 tQWN ~l .:: 1fl..\ING soMm . oven PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards .\\r.:nj .... .. c" .;.1.,; 1 , .~ . -i ,"l ~~; ~"'a' ;::.; j~"~ " ;.;,; ';~, t_-~~ fJ ,7,....f.,;:7 SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town HaiL 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 4, 1992 Fax (516) 765-1823 Marie Ongioni 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: NYNEX Mobile communications SCTMi1000-96-1-19 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The following took place at the meeting of the Southold Town planning Board on Monday, February 3, 1992. Be it RESOLVED that the Planning Board has decided to postpone its State Environmental Quality Review Act decision until receipt of a report from its environmental consultants. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, ~~rjp's Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - ... . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor ~ ::.~ ~ c::? ',0 ""\ ~ ~"'p. _ .'. .~-'- '::?/ '-. .,'",,>.)' ...;1" . Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 22, 1992 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF NYNEX Mobile Communications SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Dear Messrs. Cramer and Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board referred the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review under separate cover. Your office was notified during the week of January 8th by telephone that the Planning Board had received the $350.00 review fee from the applicant. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours, ~~ ttk/~~ ~. ~6" Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman , .' . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennen Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards . ,'\\'r-~i)1" "c, ~'\) "u.~. l,; C'(?" _ . ..., ". ''l.' '''-' . ."C 1" ..... <"'.~. ..... '".,....\ .:- ,~5 " ':.~ ~,<.-:..~~~;. ? . . C,J ':1\ . " '.~. -- ,'6,., ,:~,::'liffi:::,~5. :'), .. ,":'., ". -f ;-'.'. .. SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soulhold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 ,January 14, 1992 Marie Ongioni Attorney At Law 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 Re: Amended site plan for NYNEX Mobile Communications & Arthur V. Junge, Inc. Proposed Amendment to Approved Site Plan for Arthur V. Junge Industrial Building N/s County Road 48, Cutchogue, New York SCTM >> 1000-96-1-19 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The following resolution was adopted by the Planning Board at its meeting on January 13, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED That the Planning Board assumes Lead Agency in the environmental review of this application. A determination will be made after the Board receives the report of its environmental consultant. Payment for the environmental review was received on January 8, 1992. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, ~~~/7Z~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Coordinating Agencies Charles Voorhis, Cramer & Voorhis Associates, Inc. . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDcnald Kenneth L. Edwards ~. ;i'j:i::.:/.,;,I').~'-' "~/..;J'.'.'~~."" '.<'~" ::: :,:' ; .:)..~~ : -...;\ ":, i~ ."l' .:,1;. :~. ':'":'"-. . \~" :,:'4:'_; .G. .,. ':'). .!#~~' -..... "-.":// "~:::;~/." SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soulhold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765.1823 January 3, 1992 ~ Marie ongioni Attorney At Law 218 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 Re: Amended site plan for NYNEX Mobile Communications & Arthur V. Junge, Inc. Proposed Amendment to Approved Site Plan for Arthur V. Junge Industrial Building N/s County Road 48, CutchogUe, New York SCTM ~ 1000-96-1-19 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The cost estimate for the environmental review of the above-noted project is $350.00. Upon receipt of a check made out to the Town of Southold, our environmental consultant will be authorized to proceed with the review. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, ~ /7 /. / . ~ t7~ 6Vl.~V<..... /, Bennett Orlowski, Jr.' -;13' Chairman . CRAM Er-.:VIRC '~-"'\ A"~b 6~.\'1 '%1; . "";:'- t. "V'/," I ~ "'\ ,,\, .._... . 'i --1:"HH'\;, co';:'" <:;('Ci;1. r:.:~, :~J' ...,~%" ~~,:'.\...,::~f1~~\~~,-......:........; '~"TC:; '''",:('' l'll ;.....h..A1\l:...~H,~~~.\J.JI" 1.............1J..,U=-I'.., J. 'oJ '" '</'~ """!!If \\\\\ '~--'----'-'~"----'- ._-_._-~--------_._.- --.-- .:5UbF/c.r'3 1'.6 J6 Mr. Benr:ett Orlov,'ski, Jr. Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southo!d, Ni~W York 11971 Dcc~mber 20, ],)91 . Re: Metro Gasoline, Cmchogue NYNEX \-!obne Co!nrnUr1ic;'Hi{)j~.~! cu;,.:~ ")g~:i.~ Dear Benny: A. nee \'0'" reG-I!~s" "ill'S lH.+r-r;5 (e "'_.J,-.,:: :...: ~"'V~ 'i';rh ~.'"' ...'....!.-..,..c.fJ. -t:~L.. 'r:- l'h..~ ~i- '. 01....... i~""!ol~' ~'Vt.\",~, 'y.\J'I,,-, ,;\--....'r.I.......l~._..)! lAlvt,......~ ~""....i..... ',., environmemrll review of the abo\',~ prc~ec!s, '.\ > j::::,-,.? l":;'ii''','.-'e.J [he :r:fo,,,,a:ic-r< p.~(Nj.jeJ ~nd <, g~"st "nft 'ollov"n" s~""!'-,S "n" (>A,' '01. l ~ue- '........i,. i 1.5 ....A".....;. "'.... ,(;....... Mr:;tro G::l501ir:e - Thi.; proj';;ct will r~qui! > r'~v;,... w of t:TJ5porw:ioi1' enfineeri;,g related and review of the Short EAP. C"VA 1'rt ?O;~S te, Ir.:;p;;:" :he ::1:.0. provide a lell~r of . J' . 1 ~ . .,.' . I ' reVIe\v rego.n-.llog trans.:,onanon re Jt(~~! !~;sue~ i '(';~~u.1ng ~nv~roranenL1 ;:\tntl":':; ane :ecomrncndations, rC'lie~' and amend as nec~~s ny th.~ Short E.A..F~ ~l1d prepare a draft Determination of Significance. The fee for the e services is $450.00. NYNEX Mobile Communications - C'l. . proposes 10 inspc~'t 1110 ~ite. reviev.. file regarding ZBA decision, pro.'ide a Jett~r of rev ,',v regarding ellvjronme,lt~! status and recommendations, review and ame.nd as necessry the Short EM, and p.rep;J.r,~ 11 draft Determinati(m of Significar:ce. The fee for dl';' e services is $350.00, Thank you for the opportunity to prov:t!. )'ouwith thiS propos,,-l, Pl<:ase a-eJ','ise if you wish us to proceed with these proj~<:t:;, :n,d jon', hesit;,te to colli ifyct1 h:wc any questions. VeN truly YOu?" ~~~:::L ,r:,d-:,...l<.. T ""'0' l~rrr.p .'{(:I'O ~'. '"'~.''' ., -' UU '" iE L "j 1991 L-._ .SOUI.."..____ PLANNING 8UMe . :~l ,-j! jlji . i d II 'l'I" 'jl I, .~! J I ---- '"-.- _. _._- 54.2 NORTH CCUNTRY R01.0. ,"~IL!..E : ?LACe. ~N 117~.j (516) 331.1';55 -=,.:-:-: =.;;;;- . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards ...,?'-.-~ )/ '~L ...."" ,,-.; c;~\r': .(,.~,;-c.. ;/~-. :~.. ':;7~ ~ '1~ '-"'-'~~':.- .....!,. ;J-~'~\' .~ .,...:;: -:~ t.....:. ,...... ", -::.. i:.4 '. 1""",....3.~ -- ,;: =- .~.;:. '.. .'~:>: 5 a :.... t"o'" ":, , __"".' __ t:J ~ ~ :~~~ ~ ..J:~ ___" _-~ '%,B?;" "., . ,-;::;", ,~~,!/.,o1 ',\vA' """':\.. -"" ~ \ ' ~ ..r' SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095' Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 December 16, 1991 . RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request for NYNEX Mobile Communications & Arthur V. Junge, Inc. N/S County Route 48 Cutchogue, New York SCTM *1000-96-1-19 Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this letter is to supplement our last letter to you of December 10, 1991, pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. That letter contained the resolution of conditional approval for the Special Exception by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Since that time, the Zoning Board's final decisicns which include its findings and determinations on the Special Exception and the variance applications, both, have been completed. A copy of each is enclosed to assist you in your coordinated review. Project Name: NYNEX Mobile Communications & Arthur Junge Inc. N/s County Route 48 Cutchogue, New York Requested Action: To construct a monopole tower one hundred (100) feet in height for the purpose of installing a cellular communications transmitter and to construct an accessory equipment storage building for the tower on a Light Industrial site with an existing industrial building. " SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (x ) Unlisted Contact Person: Valerie Scopaz (516)-765-1938 cc: Building Department * Southold Town Board of Zoning Appeals Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services * .- Department of Environmental Conservation - Albany ~4- a~~?<--r- rv .' ~:i:7Ii~ ~z:a.... ?'Z' ,..06 . L-. lJ..lf.,Jt'lf\.. , fI ~ JLf1 NEW 'fORI(' H"T~ QErARIMfNf or (I'lVIRONMfNr"'l CONHRVA,nON OIVlljlQN Of l\tCUIMORY "rF....IR~ rROHCT 10 NUM8ER 5'.1. Envlronm.nl.. Ou.lIly nev'ew SHORTEN~nONMENTAL^SSESSMENTFORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PAnr I Prol.et Infonn.t1c:" (To be completed bv Applicant 0' Project 'pon,or) . I Aopllca"tJJDOnSOt' I' P'OIt'(1 N.m~ I NYNEX Mobile Communications Mobile Communications l "(JI"t:II"O-::llIo"" . M"fl"iOlllty Cutchogue-2l855 Cty.Rd. 48 COunly Suffolk ----- , 11 p,.,oo~-f IC"OI1" CX1 N..w o hOI"'1On o ModifICU"''''IItIP'lli,," . , O..criM PfCt"ct hrl.fly pre-fabricated building house Construct building foundation for to communications equipment. I --,-_. .---..... .~_._--_. -- --- . .--- I . P'.C". I.-..:u,,,," ltt'.d '"''''',"CI,Oft., """nln.n. 'andmarlu. .'e Of provtd. mapl See Suffolk County Tax Map photostat attached. ---~ The total ot parcel J.s , ",,""unl .,f land Iff.CII"l'1.0 3 .03 area acres acres 1. 04 '",Uall... . ICft'. Ultimately ICU" acres . Will "'""'''-.d .U r",nply ....th ".i,''". ton"" ar othfl "".,rlnl I.nd ute 'tnrictln"tl o 'I' ". Nt) If Nn. d"'crlb. bft~f1y Set back requirements require a variance - . W".t i, ro........, I.nd "'~ ,n "'CI",F\' nl ",a'f(:rr LJ llI"w1,,"ti.1 [j I"dun'ttl [] Cnmm".ci.1 ~ ""'Icull",,, [J rll,1r14nrf,"f'''" 'Dac. o O,h.. p.'c"to-.. -------.------ III 0.,.., .(:,,"'" lit""""", a ~..'m'tJ.II,..ovlll. a. fundinl. "OW Ot' "",.mll'"ly. I,"", a"" oth.., ,"".,"",,,"t.1 .,'!",,, f(~.,.l. It.,. or 1<<.11' [] ,., n"'n II.,..,. Iltt a'''"(:'''tl and ~'m.tI'DlHoult : , ..... & @ & U Wi & f:'\ I 0 'n; 11 OCM'" "",, '''rN'f:t of .tt. "cUa" hn. a c""enet., ".lld".m.ft Ot' '"IOV... ~ o Yu rn No If ",.t. Iltt .,.,q ft..... aN Pf!""ltI'.,."ov.1 tnM -:CO , :-'>ZI "-' I ., t......;i!.; , SOUTHO~ -. I - " \, ,..,..II of prOpotH 'clkln ...,n ."1"',", poHmIClapp,o".1 'f'fJtJlt. mlJdiflCItIon' OAIlD "-;.. o r" KJ N. -~'.-'1- !,~ --. .'. I CUTlFY flfAT THE INFOIMAflOtf r"OVIOED AIOV( IS '''ur TO UtE BEST OF MY ICNOWUDCE .,:. < ~i1/ -..H"o'"ooo,.. \X NYNEX Mo Iri-J e Communications 0.,." i\( i" ) { s"".t,,,.. . '--/ V LI ~I [ ," " 'hi .ctlon la In 'h. Cou,., Ar.... and you .r. . a'.t. Ig.ncy. compl.t. 'h. Co..'.1 A.....m.nt Form b..lo,. Proc..dlng wllh thl. ......m.nt oven . December 10, 1991 - - RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request for NYNEX Mobile Communications & Arthur V. Junge, Inc. N/s County Route 48 Cutchogue, New York SCTM ~1000-96-1-19 Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF),'and decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals to assist you in your response. Project Name: NYNEX Mobile Communications & Arthur Junge Inc. N/s County Route 48 Cutchogue, New York Requested Action: To construct a monopole tower one hundred (100) feet in height for the purpose of installing a cellular communications transmitter and to construct an accessory equipment storage building for same on a Light Industrial site with an existing industrial building. . 3EQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (x ) Unlisted Contact Person: Valerie Scopaz (516)-765-1938 The lead agency will' determine the impact statement (EIS) on this project. the date of this letter, please respond have an interest in being lead agency. need for an environmental Within thirty (30) days of in writing whether or not you Planning Board Position: (x This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. (x Other. (See comments below). Comments: The Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals has already imposed certain conditions on this public utility use which requires a Special Exception. A copy of the resolution, only, is attached. cc: *Building Department * *Southold Town Board of Zoning Appeals *Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services * Department of Environmental Conservation - Albany * Maps are enclosed for your review . . ".~'.'., PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. Mc Donald Kenneth L. Edwards scon L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December la, 1991 . ,.larie Ongioni Attorney At Law 21B Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 Re: Amended site plan forNYNEX Mobile Communications & Arthur V. Junge, Inc. Proposed Amendment to Approved Site Plan for Arthur V. Junge Industrial Building N/s County Road 4B, Cutchogue, New York SCTM >> 1000-96-1-19 Dear Ms. Ongioni: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on December 9, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED That the Southold Town Planning Board, acting pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, start the coordination process on this Unlisted Action. - - The cost estimate for the environmental review will be sent under separate cover. If you have any questions, please feel contact this office. Sincerely, ..i1.... ~ ~/Ks Jr. " Bennett Orlowski, Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney - PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SCOTI L. HARRIS Supervisor Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10, 1991 ,. RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request for NYNEX Mobile Communications & Arthur V. Junge, Inc. Nls County Route 48 Cutchogue, New York SCTM #1000-96-1-19 Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the ,action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal a completed Environmental Assessment Form (RAP), and decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals to assist you in your response. . Project Name: NYNEX Mobile Communications & Arthur Junq!,! Inc. 'Nls County Route 48 Cutchogue, New York. To construct a monopole tower one hundred IfQO:) feet in height for the purpose of installing'a: cellular communications transmitter and to construct an accessory equipment storage building for the tower on a Light Industrial site with an existing industrial building. Requested Action: . SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (x ) Unlisted Contact Person: Valerie Scopaz (516)-765-1938 The lead agency will determine the impact statement (EIS) on this project. the date of this letter, please respond have an interest in being lead agency. need for an environmental Within thirty (30) days of in writing whether or not you Planning Board Position: . (x This agencY wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ) This agency has.no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. (x ) Other. (See comments below). Comments: The Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals has already imposed certain conditions on this public utility use which requires a Special Exception. A copy of the resolution, only, is attached. cc: *Building Department * *Southold Town Board of Zoning Appeals *Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services * Department ~f Environmental Conservation - Albany * Maps are enclosed for your review ... ... ~~t ~~ ~ . SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD 19 FEBRUARY 3, 1992 1 " Mr. Orlowski: Metro Gas Station - This site plan is for'" addition of canopy to existing site, located on Main Road and Depot Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM .1000-102-5-26. Mr. McDonald: Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a motion. BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board has decided to postpone its State Environmental Quality Review Act decision until receipt of a report from its environmental consultants in this matter. Mr. Ward: Second. . Mr. Orlowski: this motion? Motion made and seconded. All those in favor? Any questions on Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Ward, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Latham. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. ***************************************** Mr. Orlowski: NYNEX Mobile Communications - This proposed site plan is to permit the installation of a 100 foot telecommunications monopole, located on C.R. 48 in Cutchogue. SCTM .1000-96-1-19.1. Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer the following resolution. BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Board has decided to postpone its State Environmental Quality Review Act decision until receipt of a report from its environmental consultants. Mr. Latham: Second. - - Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on that motion? Mar ie Ongioni: 'Good evening, thank you for this opportunity. I am representing NYNEX Mobile Communications. I understand that you received the report from the consultants. I would like to explain to you the circumstances of the late arrival of this report and make a special request that you review the report tonight and make a environmental determination. My office received a call from Voohris late Friday afternoon, actually it was about three or four o'clock. By the time we finally hooked up with him, it was about 5:10. We stayed in the office on Friday night until about 7 o'clock, faxing various documents to Chic Voohris so that he would be able to prepare and submit the report for tonight's meeting. As a matter of fact, we Express Mailed certain reports to him on Saturday so .-.. -J SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD 20 FEBRUARY 3, 1992 . that he would have them today. When morning, he said that he was working would get to this this afternoon and Board Office. He did. 1'\, we spoke to him this ": , on another project but he have it to the Planning . I realize that it was late today but I would like the Board to take this special request into consideration. I understand that his findings were in the negative. I haven't seen his report but, from what he has told my office, his findings were negative and that there would be no environmental impact. In view of that, in that there were no gray areas and it is ~ very black and white case I would make a special request that the Board vote on it tonight. I realize that it will be delayed for three weeks and it for that reason that I am here.NYNEX is anxious to move ahead with the project, a delay of three weeks will be a cost to them in revenue and also it will be a cost to the consumers who need this service in Southo1d Town because I understand that the transmission for a cellular telephone out here is not good because the service is not out here. So, I would request that the Board take this special request into consideration. Mr. Orlowski: Well, I haven't read it yet. Does the Board have any pleasure on this? Mr. Ward: chance to policy is them. That is our basic problem. We haven't really had a review it. I understand what you are saying but our not to pass on things unless at least we have read Ms. Ongioni: Is it lengthy? I haven't seen it. Mr. Orlowski: Neither have we. We just got here at 7:00 p.m.. Shall we hold it until the next meeting. Board: Yes. Mr. Orlowski: O.K.. Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion? .All those in favor? - - Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Edwards. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. **************************************** Mr. Orlowski: Board to discuss the hiring of an Environmental Consultant for the Harbor View Landing subdivision proposal. We have to send a motion over to the Town Board requesting to hire Mr. John Raynor. Mr. McDonald: Mr. Chairman, I would like to make a motion. " . Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 . ... - . WILLlA.l\1 J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHA.l\1, JR. RICHARD G. WARD ,-:':::'::":::::"-""'.;;;;- ,,:"~.~~\lFFaL,r;~_ _...:~ <::< . .~' ... .. ~-:. .::: ~- . - . _::~;, - ~.:; ~. \,.looo: ~'. ,..,., :~. ~ 0'", ~.' "-:.~ ~~:' ~:~~ ~_-f":' ----- Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR Chainnan PLA1'lNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . May 16,1997 Richard Weyhreter Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile 60 Herricks Rd. Mineola, NY 11501 Re: Cellular Telephone Tower - Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Weyhreter. Attached please find our environmental consultant's bill for reviewing the Environmental Assessment Form for the above referenced proposal. Please submit a check made out to the Town of Southold, in the amount of $850.00 to cover this expense. Sincerely, ~cf~ Valerie Scopaz ' ./ Town Planner ~, -~. enc. . ,- ,.-.-....... - - ,- - . -.... -,.::;. ~' . -:-c:_':.::::: ::::=-'F~. '-'-- NEl.SON, pOP.,.; & V0'.9RH1S. 1.1.C ~, , ' ,_.=" M , ~ , .. . . ,_ > , ~ ' ~" .= eN' - . , ' N G ""cO< .,OO'""'''~ _,C" ,","V'. ',Q'''€~ '€ ,,,"o,,T 0 'Q""<Cc'~' ,,0'0" .." " ,_",e'-' ""~,,,.,, ' ,o,,~, :' .,.,'0' ,R ?, . ,:....uS;":.:>...f.? ... I'lCl;lNZC'l. ~~. ~ . To: Frons: !)ale: Re: Valene Scopaz Chic Voorhis May 16, 199 Bell .~t1antic . ....By FA-'<- ONLY -ONE (1) pA.GE _516-765-3136.... Dear Valerie: The fax yOU sent was fine, please send a copy of the ODe t.~e Board adopted. "" ",,,,,,oJ. ",. ,..... r.. fu' """ t"'~'. E." ,...... .", imP"'''" ~, phO~ consultation, is $850.00. Tho>k you ro< '" OI'P""""'~ " M.~ you wi" "" ,roi"'. "" """ '" ",.00 ba~ , any questions. rro:f..e.d-- S' I' c. (if] . ~"'f.:'" , SOUT1-iDL: ';"1\~,hi-'~ PlANN!~,~G :J'~:.:.:'::;' . 572 'NAC' WH'P"-'-'" ~o..c, ",eC'J'CC'" NY ,,7"-' (5'~) .27.5GS5 FA"- ,," Gl 4:;!C TOThL . WILLIA.l\-l J. CRE::'IERS KENNETH L. EDW..>JIDS GEORGE RITCHIE U..THAl"l. JR. RICHARD G. W..>JID /:~~fFOl;-~ . ~.~ . C'%,~_ . ff' . :;::.-.: :';: ;;-" ~-: :; en ~ .,' ". ~ . ("f-,." -:.0 . -.; - A, ... ......""'... - 'N ~,-,. ~~:- ~_:;:::., --<~- Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, ::-< ew York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLA.l"lNING BOARD MEMBERS BD1NETI ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 13, 1997 . Matthew Pachman, Esq. Pachman, Pachman & Brown, P.C. 366 Veterans Memorial Hwy. Commack, NY 11725 Re: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr, Pachman: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 12, 1997: WHEREAS the Planning Board has reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment Form, dated April 2, 1997 and an addendum dated May 9, 1997, and . WHEREAS it has reviewed the comments of its environmental consultant, Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC, dated April 22, 1997 and May 8, 1997, and WHEREAS this review has indicated that the proposed monopole height is 84 feet, and that the visual impacts of the proposed monopole on the surrounding countryside are likely to be significant, and . . WHEREAS, the applicant has not submitted documentation of need, and WHEREAS the proposed project presents a potential land use conflict with the community's vision for the Orient area, and, WHEREAS the project sponsor has not provided site specific mitigation measures relevant to the application before the Planning Board, and, WHEREAS the Planning Board wishes to prepare Part 3 of the Long Environmental Assessment Form in order to more closely consider the significance of potential land use conflicts, visual intrusion and cumulative impacts of the proposed project, be it therefore RESOLVED That the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State '\11" ":~~' .... . . Page 2 Site plan for Sell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - anent May 13. 1997 . Environmental Quality Review Act, as the lead agency makes a determination that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action, and BE IT Further RESOLVED That the applicant submit documentation of need and detailed information about the proposed mitigation measures including elevation drawings and artist's renderings and other designs which may be more in character with the neighborhood that will enable the completion of Part :3 (Evaluation of the Importance of Impacts). Be It Further RESOLVED That if the applicant chooses not to provide this information the Planning Board may prepare a Part 3 at the applicant's expense. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, ;3'6-?/..1U-tZ... cfZL-&,~/ yv/;/S Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chainman cc: Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning , NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany New York State Department of Slate Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority . . NELSON, ;:::::o;:::::e & VI:lORHIS, LL.C :~., =::,"'.\Il=,....':"~... . "":................ ....:j . e=~s.......'!";r..':: : .....;:.~;:; _~ :G-=,R:~~: ~=p :.,,:.,!~: .l,.fI~r,:l,.;;;: . ~.?E:~E.H ~::.. :~:/IIC~~: ';. ':':.-IN'.:-1. Y. ; E . ....., '';~ ",,,,,.., "::'.' ;C ~c,..... ,., :::."'~;l,NI.... "" . ~_So:,." C ~el..SC:>l. .;s;. .'.::.. . ,>01ll13TOPl-lliR 'N ~OcW':~=N. Pi. May 9, 1997 . Ms. Valerie Scopaz Southold Town Plannmg Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Bell Atlantic Mobile EM SCTM# 1000- I 8-6- 5 Dear Valerie. We have received the comment letter trom Theresa Elkowitz on the Bell Atlantic Mobile EAF. This letter presents minor revisions :0 what were relatively minor comments or claJifications by our office, and does not change the primary conclusions presented in Ol!r letter of Apil 22, 199i. The proposed tower will present significant land use and ViSUal impacts, although the remaining impacts of the proposed project are likely to be minor The only substantive comlnent is that they have changed their plans slightly, and the proposed tower will be 84' rather than 100' in height. The site quantities have also been r-~vised. The project sponsor's iritiaJ E.-\F did not include alterations outside of the fenced area . induding the gravel road. We assumed in our calculations that limited clearing ",ould OCClJr along the roadway and outside of the fence during cOnstruction. We probably overestimated, but the re1d figures are probably slightly larger than presented in their comment letter. As the ecological and topographic impacts were judged to be insignificant even ",ith our larger estimates. this con: mem is not substantive. . It is true that the project sponsor will cemrol only the 0.41 acres to be leased, and we acknowledge the comments made on page 3 of the comment letter. Our corrections to the E.-\F were intended to clarify the fuet that the proposed lease area is part of a larger parcel, and that th~ ::. location <,f the proposed tower in the middle of the parcel will restrict developmem of th,{ northern j)orrion of the parcel. Again, as long as the proposed project is understOod as to be a lease of a small pOrtion of a larger parcel. these revisions are minor We defer to the project sponsor en whether FCC approval would be required, as they should be familiar with these reqUIrements. Finally. we did not prepare a yield map co determine the yield of the parcel under 572 WAL'1'" W,..,t:MAN F4C~O, .'YlEL.V!L:.~. NV 1~74'7-21aa (SIal ~27'S';;5= ~,~x (:;-:61 427..5520 :-'!;.:.., -, ,-- .' -"-"-''';'' ..:::_-- ' - . exis:ir.g zoning. Typicallv, const!1Jc:ion of an adequate access road would allow for only lour parcels OIl a let of this size. but \;,'e defer to the project sponsor iftneir map cQnfOrm~i to code. In summary. the comments provided by the project sponsor are minor. and there should be no need for further revision of the EAF The basic land use issues discussed in 0ur letter rernain as substantial concer::s. and the conclusions are not altered by the project sponsor' s comments Please cal! if you have fur:her questions. Thank you. . -1~ ~>~~ Nikki Coffey Tousley cr:-- NELSON, POPE, AJ.'ID VOORHIS .... - .PEM NELSON, pope &- VCCl~H1S. ~.:....c IiNVlAQNrv'.eNTAt.. . ~_.ANl'\lI"'1G . C~N~l.. ;I~ TOTi'.L P. 0::; . \.r.D - ;;td^ NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC EN"I~ONMENTAl. . ~LANNING . CONSULT1NG CHARLES J. VOORHIS. CEP. Alep . ARTHUR J. KOERBER, PE. . VINCENT G. CONNELLY, PE . VICTOR BERT. P,E. . JOSEPH R. EP1F.4.NIA. P.E.- ROBERT a.NELSON, JR. PE. . CHRISTOPHER W ROBINSON. P,E. April 22, 1997 Mr. Richard Ward, Chainnan Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ..- ,.... -- , '.. , . .......~__....__;~..~....:. ~~:;~_~~'.f_; \ . . Re: Review ofEAF Bell Atlantic Special Use Permit for Public Utility Structure SCTM No. 1000-018-6-5. . Dear Mr. Ward: As per your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by NP&V, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. . 3. Environmental and Planning Considerations The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The site consists of 10.54 acres ofland in the hamlet of Orient in the Town 'of Southold. The subject site is located south ofNYS Route 25 approximately 375 east of Platt . ,. ".,' Road and has approximately 224 feet of frontage on NYS 2S. . , The area of the site is zoned Single Family Residential 80, which would permit residential subdivision of the site with a minimum lot size of80,000 s.t: The proposed action involves an application for a special use permit to allow a public utility structure in order to construct a 100' monopole for a cellular telephone antenna. The pole would be approximately 2 feet in diameter. - - Page 1 !372 WALT WHITMAN ROAO. MELVILLE, NY 11747.2188 (151 SJ 427-!SSS5 FAX (518) 427.5620 . bell Atlantic Special Use Permit EAF Review Approximately 0.05 acres would be leased to the project sponsor, Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile, for the antenna and a 466 s.f. equipment shelter. A gravel road would be constructed for access to the antenna, and a chain link fence would be installed around the facility to protect the antenna from vandalism. . The project site is flat, and there are no wetlands or other significant landforms in the vicinity. The soils on site are entirely Haven Loam, slopes 0-2 percent. This soil series is suitable for development, with good leaching potential. Although Haven soils with shallow slopes are not classified within groups 1-4 of the NYS Agricultural Land Classification System, they are fertile agricultural soils which warrant preservation. The elevation of groundwater beneath the site is approximately 2 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the 1992 SCDHS map, and the topographic elevation is approximately 19 feet above msl. Thus, the depth to groundwater is approximately 17 feet below the surface. The proposed project will not require sanitary facilities, and the only impervious surface will be the roof of the proposed shelter. Thus, the impact on groundwater resources is expected to be negligible. The depth to groundwater is sufficient for residential development, and development under the existing R-80 zoning would be expected to result in only minimal impacts. The subject site is located within the Water Budget Area as mapped by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). The Water Budget Area includes those locations where there is sufficient groundwater to develop large public water supply wells. The subject site is also located in SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which covers the North Fork and portions of the South Fork. According to the North Fork Water Supply Plan (ERM- Northeast, Camp Dresser & McKee, 1983), the subject site is in an area significantly impacted by aldicarb (concentrations over 7 ug/l). In addition, nitrate contamination (concentrations over 8 ug/l) is present in an area to the east of the site. . The entire site is abandoned agricultural land. Fallow field occupies most of the site, although there is an area of overgrown nursery stock to the south. The proposed structure will be . located in the northern portion of the site near NYS 25, although a 300 foot setback from the road has been employed to allow a 120 foot radius in the event that the antenna were to faiL' The project area is vegetated almost exclusively by ragweed, with a limited number of other old field species. The nursery stock to the south is predominantly evergreen trees and shrubs, . including juniper and cedar, and black pine. Bayberry and other deciduous shrubs and trees are':~ also present. The proposed project will occupy only a small area of the site, and the remaining ; land could either be allowed to undergo succession or be returned to an active farming use. The ecological impacts of the proposed project will be minimal after project construction. The land use in the vicinity of the site is predominantly agricultural, with a mix of residential development and a few small scale commercial properties along the NYS 25 corridor. The rural .1tEM NELSON. POPE & VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRCJl"\lMENT AL . ~Al'INING . CONSULTING Page 2 . . bell Atlantic Special Use Permit EAF Review . character of the area should be considered a valuable resource, and the potential for land use conflicts and visual impacts is the primary concern associated with the proposed project. The proposed project will introduce a new land use which is incongruous with the existing rural quality of the area. Although the monopole and building can be partially screened, they would seriously detract from the pastoral character of the hamlet. The proposed project would allow continued agricultural use of most of the parcel, which would not be possible if the parcel were developed under existing zoning. However, the location of a large communication' structure in the area will result in an inherent land use conflict, and this impact is expected to be significant. The height of the structure and use of the property should be considered in the context of appropriate land use and zoning in the vicinity. . The visual impacts of the proposed project are also likely to be significant, although partial mitigation could be employed. The proposed structure will be apparent from both NYS 25 and from local residences along Platt Road. The subject site is clearly visible from the surrounding area due to the adjacent agricultural uses and lack of vegetation along NYS 25, and the open vistas across the agricultural fields contribute to the rural quality of the area. The existing nursery stock will help screen views from the south, but the 100' pole will be visible. Lighting of the structure may also be employed, which will intrude on the character of the area during the nighttime hours. These impacts can be partially mitigated through the use oflandscaping to provide screening. At a minimum, the proposed shed and fenced area should be screened with new plantings. Additional street plantings could also be utilized along NYS 25 to help soften views of the proposed monopole. The proposed setback of300 feet is great enough that a 20 foot tree would block views of the proposed monopole from NYS 25. It is recommended that deciduous trees and shrubs be used along the roadway. Although evergreens would provide more complete screening, they would be inconsistent with the existing streetscape along NYS 25, and the monopole would not dominate views if observed through a hedgerow of deciduous trees and shrubs. Similar plantings could be utilized along the western border of the site to screen views from Platt Road, although the existing homes offer some mitigation. Views across the fields from the south and east will be more distant, but the pole would still be visible if no mitigation is employed. Although the visual intrusion of the proposed pole might be mitigated . by new plantings, such landscaping would also eliminate the existing agricultural vistas from NYS 25 and Platt Road. Maintenance of these vistas is important in protecting the rural natUre of the hamlet, and thus the visual impacts of the proposed project should be considered significant. No traffic impacts are expected as a result of the proposed project, as on going maintenance will require only two trips per month. There may be a slight impact on local traffic during construction. Impacts on community services such as police, fire and school districts should also be minimal. There will be a negligible tax increase to provide services, and no increase in demand for services is expected. The structure will be fenced to minimize the potential for vandalism or trespassing by young people. IIP&V NELSON. POPE &- VOORHIS. LLC ENVIRONMENTAL 4 PLANNING . CONSULTING Page 3 - . )jell Atlantic Special Use Pennit EAF Review . In addition to these site specific impacts of the proposed project, the cumulative impacts of the proposed project must be considered. Approval of the proposed project will set a precedent for approval of other tower sites within the Town. Without proper planning, this would result in a significant intrusion on the rural nature of the community. The proposed project should be considered in the context of an overall plan for the siting of communication structures so as to minimize potential impacts on land use and visual resources. If the Town Board agrees to allow these structures within the Town, their locations should be carefully chosen to minimize the number of towers and identifY the optimal sites. The current application should not be considered without investigation of the cumulative impacts of the proposed project. . . . In summary, the primary concerns related to the proposed project are the potential for land use conflicts and visual impacts. In addition, there are potential cumulative impacts on siting of towers in other parts of the Town. The visual impacts can be partially mitigated by screening of the proposed structure with plantings along the northern and western boundaries of the site, but the inherent land use conflict would not be mitigated by these measures and the existing agricultural vista would be lost. Some impacts would be greater Iinder existing single family zoning, including greater disruption of the native soils and vegetation on site, as well and discharge of sanitary flow to groundwater. Single family subdivision would also result in a permanent use which precludes agriculture on the site. Ongoing agricultural use will be possible under the proposed project, and the site could be returned to full agricultural use if the lease were discontinued in the future. Single family development would also result in slightly greater traffic impacts, as well as a greater demand for community services. While some of these impacts might be locally significant ifunmitigated, construction off our to five new homes would not be expected to result in significant cumulative impacts and land use conflict issues would not occur, as the land is zoned for residential use. Th~ board may wish to require a Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part 3 Narrative and Analysis which addresses the potential land use conflicts, visual intrusion and cumulative impacts of the proposed project. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. ~4.; ~~ enc: Long EAF Parts I & II les. oorhis, CEP, AICP Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC .P&Y NELSON. POPE & VOORHIS. LLC ENVlAONt\llENT AL . F=lL.A.NNING . CONSULTING Page ~ . 1~-16-2 (2/87)-7c " 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR . Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly. there are aspects or a project thac are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge or the environment or may be technically expert in environmental anaIY'5is. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a r:nethod whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information 0(0 fit a project or action. . Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3, Part 2: Focuses on identifying' the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. . DETERMINA TION OF SIGNIFICANCE - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions ( Identity the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate). and any other supporting information. and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact. it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that:. o A. The project will not result in any large and important impac~s) and. therefore. is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a negative dedal'ation will ~ pl'epared~' . o B. Although the' project could have a significant effect on the environ":'ent, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required. the..efore a CONDITIONED negaUve declaration will be prepared.' o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive cleclaration will be prepared. . A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions ; r""\ Po r~ ~ r W/ ~ !:1 i I' n 1 IS \::J '- IJ >..; ,J II', 'u II' ,,' ,i:;:- , "' " ';;j Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Communications Monopole Site I Ql: APR 3 ': i,:) , Name- ot Action , . J;:"7;~:':};pr -';~ Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in ledd Agency 5ign:ature of Preparer{lf different from responsible officer) Date PART 1-PROJECT INFOr: .UION . Prepared by Project Sponsor .'-10 rrCE. This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have d significant e on the t"nVlfonmenC Pledse complete the entire form, Parts ^ through E. Answers to these Questions will be consic;,j d:S p.d,(: or che apolll:..HIOn ror approval and may be subjecr to further verific.lCion and public review. Provide ;mv addici InformaCIon yOU belse...e will be needed to complete Parti 2 and J. It is e:\pecced ~hdC compl~tlon or the (ull E^F will be dependent on information currently available and will noc inv new studies. research or Investigation. II' information reQuiring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate dnd sp: eelch instance. . NAME OF ACTION Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Communications Monopole Site LOC"" nON OF ACTION (Inc!ude Slr..1 Address. Municloallly Ind CouneyJ 24850 Main Road, Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Communications f ADDRESS 60 Herricks Road CITY/PO Mineola 9!JS1NESS TELEPHONE (516) 739-4622 NAM E OF OWNER fit aiU.tllIfU) Mark and Mary Beth Phillips ADDRESS 217 4th Street CITY/PO ZIP cooe reen ort 11944 OESCRIPTlON OF ACTJON Lease of an approximately 1,800 square foot vacant parcel to construct a 100 foot monopole for cellular antennas and an associated 12' x 40' unmanned equipment shelter Lease area is located on a 10.54t acre former. agricultural parcel. Tax Map No. District 1000 - Section 18 BLock 6 Lot 5. ZlP COOE 11501 ~(i. PI..~s.. Complele E~ch Qu...lion-Indic~le N.A. if not ~ppllc~b/e A. Site Description Physical setting of o...erall proj..ct. both d.......loped and und.....elop..d areas. , Present land use: DUrban Olndustriaf DCommercial OResidential (suburban) ORural (non-far.- ~ OForesl OAgricullure IiilOlher former. agricultural field and nursery _ \:IrOlal acreage of project area: 10.54 acres. currently vacant APPROXIMATE ACREAGE *Formerly agricultural PRESENTLY AFTER COM~lETfON Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) field and acres . acres Forested nursery acres acres * .. !U .)4 Agricultural (Includes orchards. cropland, paSlure, elc.) acres 4lf." 16.0\' Wetland. (Freshwaler or lidal as p..r.Articfes 24, 2S of ECl) acres Water Surface .~rea acres Un...egelated (Rock. earth or fill) ~2A-YeL. '1:>e...~ acr..s Roads. buildings and oth..r pa...ed surfaces (monopole and acres Oth (I d. I t J equipment shelter) er n lea e ype acres Q) What is predomi~ant soil type(s) on project silel Haven loam. 0 to 2 percent slopes a. Soil drain~ge: IiClWell drained 100 % of ute OModerately w..1I drained OPoorly drained % of site ,\,,~ b. If any agricultuialla.nd is invol"ed how many acres of soH are c1a.ssified within soil group 1 through 4 or the .'1YS ,.. land Classification Syst..ml ~ acres. (See' NYCRR 370). . . 0.0 G) Are there bedrock outcroppings on prOlect site? DYes e9No .A' a. What is deplh to bedrock I > ~O~ (in feet) 1Jv' SSO' I acres . acres acres 0.01 0.01 ~ acres ...j..... . acres ~ (.HaA) acres % of site 2 . 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes; ll!lo-10% 100 Ql 5 % or greater % Dlo-1S% % 6. Is. project substantially contiguous co. or contain a building. site. or district. listed on the State or the Nation. Registers of Historic Places? DVes lENa 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register 01 National Natural landmarks! CjYes Il!lN ~D@ What is the depth 01 the water table! 17:: (in feet] vJP,~i2.. ~"\ '2,.' \ "!:>e?'T1-\- .i"ll W ....~i2.. 1,1 9. Is site located over a primary. principal. or sole source aquifer? ~Yes DNa 10. 00 hunting. fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DVes e9No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered DYes 2QNo According to ~i te in~oection Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or DYes 1&1 No unusual land lorms on the project site! (i.e.. cliffs. dunes, other geological lormations Describe . 13. Is the project DYes site presently used by the community or Iii No II yes, exp./ain neighborhood ~s an open space or recreation area? 14. Does the present site incJude scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes ClINo 1 S. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name 01 Stream and name 01 River to which it is tributa'Y RIA 16. lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: 3. Name RIA b. Size (In acres) ( 17. Is the site served by existing public utilitie.? roYes DNo aJ If Ye., does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? mYes DNo bl If Yes, will.improvements be necessary to allow connection? KlYes DNo (on-site improvements) 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certilied pursuant to Agriculture and Markets law, Article 2S-AA. Section 303 and 304! DYe. IiiNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 01 the ECl, and 6 NYCRR 6171. DYes I&INo 20. Ha. the site ever been used lor the disposal of solid or hazardous waste.? DYes mNo . B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (till in dimensions as appropriate) to.'5>~ l,\w.~L.~.rc:.t.~~ ..re> Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by p~oject sponsor .'.05: acres, to be leased. 1J V\ ail Project acreage to be developed: ~ O.~t..cres initially; ~O.<<"'cres ultimately. c. Pro;ect acreage to remain undeveloped 10.49 acres. (",.re:o' .A-i'Pl..cAt-IT APPEA/l.S jlJ or 11> JoI Me. ,AaolJ1oI rs J) d. length 01 project. in miles: RIA (II appropriate) Fota. 4!ibl/ci. 2>.e,,'c.) e. If the project is an expansion. indicate percent of expansion proposed N/ A %; f. Number of oU:street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 2 U" g. Ma.ximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? n. If residential: Number and type of housing units: NI A One Family Two Family Multiple Family *One to two trips . per montn to inspec t equi!>J"tlt Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of l.argeH proposed Hructure 100 :' height; 12 t width: ~linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is' ~ *Monopole is 100 ft, in h~ight - equipment shelter J 40' length. , It.7."Z3. is 12 ft. x 40 ft. I,V" ;"u-.", "..Jl....,..., "I... i.:.; , 1,,11 r"L'" r:<..lllll. c:lL.J ~vlll VI.: H.:I/IU'H';U /fUll ~ .ilte! 11.1 '.fUl-i/LutJlC yards . J. \Vjlf discurbed dredS be reddlrr.~d! ':;Yes ONo (?3N/A a. It '.,es. tor what inceno . purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. \V:/I c(')psoil be ;tockpllec tor rec/dmation? DVes DNo c. \ViII upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DVes ~DG 5. DNa o .~:l- B.a].. *lm!ll!! acres. ann How mdnv .1t;res or vegetation (tree:s. shrubs. ground covers) will be removed from site? "ViII dny mature rarest {o...~:" 100 years old} or other focally.important vegetation be removed by this project! OVes ~No . 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: N/ A a. Total number or phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. I s phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phasesl 8. Will blasting occur during construction I ;::Yes rnNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 2 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilitiesl 3 months. (including demo/itionl. (numberl. month month DYes year. (including demolition). year. DNa ; after project is complete o DVes iiilNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? SYes rnNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYe, . iiilNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or. decrease by proposal7 DVes KlNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 y~ar flood plainl DYes CZlNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste/ DYes iiBNo a. If yes. what is the amount per month tons b. If yes. will. an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes DNo c. If yes. give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DVes DNo e. If Yes. explain " . 17. Will the project involve the' disposal of solid wastel a. If yes, what is the antiCipated rate of. disposal? b. If yes. what is the anticipated site life! 18. Will project use herbicides or. pesticIdes I ~Yes DYes IDNo tonslmonth. years. fiNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DVes 'Il!INo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? . DVes !llINo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy usel If yes. indicate type(s) Electricity ~Yes DNo . 22. 23. If water supply is from wells. indicate pumping cdPacity o N/A gallonslminute. Total anticipated water usage per ddV gallonslday. DYes I!9No 24. Do-es project involve Local, If Yes. explain Scate or FederdJ fundIng! 4 --.-...------- - ---.. ("'"~-- -- C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision I !iilYes oNo If Yes, indicate decision required: ozoning amendment ozoning variance Gilspecial use permit osubdivision osite plan' onew/revision of master plan o!e5ource management plan oother 2. What is the zoning c1assification(sJof the site? R-80 . ~ What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning I fJ'-'\ ~ single-family homes on overall 10.54 acre property. ~V~ . . . 4. What is the proposed zoning 01 the site? N/ A S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoningl N/A . ti) Approvals Required: jI€-~jty. Town. \'i'la~e 80.1fd City. Towr.. Village Plclnning Board City. Town Zoning 80Jrd City. County Health DepJrtment Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies ~ Federal Agencies . Gl'Yes Ii1lNo DVes 62No !l!!Yes oNo [;Yes GilNo eVes GilNo DYes ~No DYes CllNo ~es CllNo Type Submitt.1 D~te SIT"E ?:..AN. 31-''t:l~Q,1 Bo;:),- P......u...:.L [v.. Pub ~c Utility Structure ~ Co s:- '. 6.. Is the proposed. action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plansl ItIYes oNo 7. . What are the predQroinant I~nd use(s) and z.onjng c1assifiqtions ",jt. hin a \4 mile radius of proposed' action I Land uses; res~dent1ai, commerciai ,gas stat~on and landscaping company),. agricutlural zonin2: ~-80. B (General Business) . 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a \4 milel Ii1lYes ONo 9. I f the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposedl N / A a. What is the minimum lot size proposedl 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(sl for the lormation of sewer or water districts I DYes KINo ". Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police. fire protection II DYes ItINo a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demandl DYes oNo , 2 _ Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levelsl DYes lUNo a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional trafficl DYes oNo . .;i"" D. Informational Details -- ~..' Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarity your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal. please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitJgate or avoid them. Signa cure If the ~ction is in the Co~st.11 with this ,usessmenl. ue t9 the best of my knowleds.e. biie by Freudenthal &. Elkowitz . 0llSJ11 h:J'" t"' Date itle President seney. complete the Co~st~j Assessment Form before proceeding 4/2/97 5 . Responsibility of lead Agency Part 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE General Informalion (Read Carefully) . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonableJ The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project. on each sile, in each localily, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. . . In identifying impacts, consider long term. short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Ves if there will be any Impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Ves answers. c, If answering Ves to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to Indicate the pOlentlal size of the Impact. If Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold Is lower than example, check column 1. d. Idenilfylng that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that It is also necessarily significant. Any large Impact must be evaluated In PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an Impact In column 2 simply asks that It be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the Impact then consider the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large Impact checked In column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) In the project to a small to moderate Impact, also check the Ves box In column 3. A No response Indicates that such a reduction Is not possible. This must be explained In Part 3. . IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? . DNO B'YES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater. (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. . . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. . Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1.000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. . Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. . Construction in a designated fJoodway. . Other impacts #,NrMAJ.. Gt"'A'br~ 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs. dunes, geological formations. elc.)0NO DYES . Specific land forms: . 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes DNa 0 0 DVes oNo 0 0 DYes DNa . 0 0 oYe~" DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa g- O DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa . IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15.24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) oNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Oevelopable area of site contains a protected water body. . Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. . Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. . Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body . of water? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . ^ 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a '0 acre increase or decrease. . Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. . Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater -"" quality or quantity? 0NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. . Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. . Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons p~r minute pumping capacity. . Construction or operation causing any c.ontamination of a water supply system. . Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. . Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilitie. which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · . Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge Into an existing body of water to the extent tl;1at there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. . Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. . Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. . Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. . Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patte~ or _WruMm ~~ Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would change flood water flows. surface DYES 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYe. DNo 0 D. DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes oNo .... 0 0 DYes ,'oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes oNo . > . Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. o Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. . Other impacts: . IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air Quality? iaN'o DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. o Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. o Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed Sibs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. o Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. o Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endang~d species? I11NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. o Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. o Applicaiion of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. . Of her impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non. threatened or . non-endangered species? DNa eJYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. . Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. I . , """',M4L.. UEJIIZ/II6j ~ oLb FtELt> IlEi,(,EfT/tT1tJN IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? DNa I21YES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 ~ 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderale Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo . 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo .. . 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes tJNo , - 0 0 DYes rnNo . . Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. .-.. 0.0 Aal6:5 . The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.S acres of agricultural land. . The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . Other impacts: . IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources 1 DNa (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in !bAu> c~ to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. . Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. o Project components that will result in the elimination or significant scree!ling of scenic views known to be important to the area. o Other impacts: IN.......~M O\l HiPc.w.:roXl.At- \A~"'lIl15>-' 42.""""I1t>lc:; 'O.lO""'-T> AI.~ F.l...I>-I.INA.'tF. VI~T~ . IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of i)istoric, pre. historic Qr paleontological importancel IaNO DVES Eumples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on-the State or National Register of historic places, . o Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil ,bed located within the project site, o Proposed Action will Occur in an area designated as sertsitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 l;dN'o DVES . The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. . A major reduction of an open space important to the community. o Other impacts: 9 Iil'fES 617.20, 1 2 Small to Potential Can I Moderate Large Mitig Impact Impact Project !EJ 0 DYes 0 0 DYes 0 0 DVes . 0 0 DYes 0 It3'"' l!JYes 11"<<'1'1 ~'" 0 0 DVes 0 0 DYes 0 Ii1' DVes 0 0 DVes 0 0 'DVes 0 0 DVes ci:.'"" 0 0 DVes ,. 0 0 DVes 0 0 DVes 0 0 Dves 3 mpact B. ated By Chang DNo DNo DNo DNa DNo AI- "1\0~ DNo DNo !;!'No DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNa . 10 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change . 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNa 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo ," - . .. , 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14 Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique character- istics of a critical environmental area (CEA) estllblished...;>ursuant to subdivIsion 6 NYCRR 617.14(g)' ~O DYES list the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. . Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? . Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the Quantity of the resource? . Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? . Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? . Other impacts: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ~O [lVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. \ViII proposed action affect the community's sourco/ of (uel or energy supply? lO:fNO [InS Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5 % increase ill the U$e of any form of energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 Single or two famil~' residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. . Other impacts: . NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo . 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNO 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 (if' DVes WNo 0 0 DVes DNa 0 r:;;r DVes ia1'/0 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibratioryas a result of the Proposed Action? irlNo DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. . Odors will OCcur routinely (more than one hour per day). . Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. . Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. . Other impacts; IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH , 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? I QNO DVES ! Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action mav cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (Le, oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc,) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. . Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i,e, toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc,) . Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of Iiquified natural gas Or other flammable liquids, . Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBOflHOOD 19, Will proposed action affect the character of the existing commu~y? DNa IifVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. . The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than S % per year as a result of this project. . Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals, . Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. . Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. . Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) . Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. . Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. . Other impacts: -P016~fllL.. l..DNf'l..ICI ~IT" iCu.2.AL- ("~"AllAc.'1e2.. OF~ 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impact.v DNa If any Bclfon In Part 2 Is Idenm'ed as a polenllal 'arge Impacl or If you cannol delormlne Ihe magnllude 0' Impacl, proceed 10 Part 3 !iJ'YES 11 WILLIA.1v! J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCmE LATHAM, JR. RIClL"JID G. WARD c>~UFFalt~ '/~lI~ C'o""', '.'~. . . ~"C. ,~:::, . :::..-', :; 0 : :-4 . ~cn. .. <: ::.~ . !:!!: "'......... ~ . ~ b .... _-- - FA. ~\- - ~(}.I -+ ""~.-:::- ~~~..::;:,~:..:..;.. Town Hall, 53095 )'lain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765.1938 . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . April 22, 1997 Daniel Falasco, P.E. Savik & Murray 2110 Smithtown Ave. Ronkonkoma, NY 11 779 Re: Proposed site plan for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - Orient SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Falasco: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 21, 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board acting under the State Environmental Quali:ty Review Act. assume lead agency status on this action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely. ~/?I/ "CL ~ / T'/.-6 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT DF PUBLIC WORKS S"b, , ?e, ...;S April II, 1997 STEPHEN G. HAYOUK, P.E. COMMiSSIONER . Town of Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 . Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile - O<;.,.,;k Dear Ms. Scopaz: We have reviewed the above-referenced SEQRA. Specifically note that: This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for this proposed development. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-4099. Very truly yours, Richard J. LaValle, P.E. Chief Engineer RJUMPC/jfb SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNllY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER 335 Y APHANK A VENUE . YAPHANK. N.Y. 11980 . ~/ J (5161 852.4000 FAX (5161852-4150 ~-'- ~ . \:'0 JS April 8, 1997 NYS~\ilterfi"Ollts George E. P3taki GotIernor Alexander F. Treadwell Secretary of State . Ms. Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Platt Road, Orient Dear Ms. Scopaz: Thank you for submitting the Lead Agency Coordination Request to the Department of State (DOS). We are not interested in assuming Lead Agency status; we do not object to the Town of Southold Planning Board as Lead Agency. If it is determined that a federal permit or federal funding is required for any portion of the proposed project, please instruct the applicant to submit a Federal Consistency Assessment Form (FCAF) and supporting information to the U.S. ACOE/NY and to the DOS. Upon receipt, we will determine if the information is adequate to commence a formal review of the project for consistency with New York State's Coastal Management Program. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call me at (518) 474-6000. S~~ Walter F. Meyer Coastal Resources Specialist WFM/wfm 1_',: , . , '.-' -, -. i .~: ~-"~--""-'~'-- . H_~' '..1 !]~ !~~;\ c. U.S. ACOE/NY - Sophie Ettinger file h:...~ t-\Pi; j 5 .L-~... --._..~,_. . _.::'-!.----~.._". NYS DEI'ART.lJF.NT 01' STATE Di'fJisian af Coastal Resources and Watnfront Revitalization Albany, NY 12231-0001 Voice: (518) 474-6000 Fax." (518) 473.2464 WILLIAM J. CRE~ERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCillE U.THAM. JR. RICHARD G. WARD ---~ ,fL,O~\lFFOl.t- ~ ./ ~.~ t'Oc:<""\ :'~ ~ ~ '~:::, ~.... ~ 0 . :.: " "" """ ~~ ~} ~ J. .. ...."".... ""./';(. ~,"., ~Q.! + i-~ ,.J '?o-~_ -.&Y -...~- Town Hal!. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. Chairman PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 4. 1997 . Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope and Voorhis 572 Walt Whitman Rd. Melville, NY 11747 Re: Review of EAF for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned site plan to your office for review. Also enclosed is the site plan dated August 20, 1996 The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on March 31, 1997. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the April 21,1997 pubiic meeting. Please review the enclosed and submit an estimate of your fee. Please contact this office if there are any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, ~. ~9v~ Bennett OrlowskJ, Jr. Chairman enc. . WILLI&,! J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD <'r:C"::='::':::::":::-~-:::...., .,~'\;.~'1,IlFFDL.t t'~ ;)'~ ~~. ,y~ ~.. '/ c::::l . :.; .~ en . _ ., ~ ~ y '\~.. . $) "'- ~ ~~.':' ~'().l -+ i:~~...:"" ~"!.r Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 South old, New York 11971 Fa-x (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765.1938 PL-\NNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Requested Action: This site plan is for a cellular telephone tower facility to be located on a 4,530 square foot section of a 10.5 acre lot located on the south side of SR25, 375. feet east of Platt Rd., in Orient. SEQRA Classification: (X) Type I ( ) Unlisted "'~" ,." " Contact Person: Valerie Scooaz, Town Planner (516) 765-1938 . Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( X) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. - _. ( Other (see comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSOEC - Albany New York State Department of State Suffolk County Department of Public Works New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority . , Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 .. ., 14-16-2 (2/87)-7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determIne. in an orderly manner. whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent. Iy. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition. many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly. comprehensive in nature. yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. . Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. ( DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 0 Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate). and any other supporting information. and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that:. o A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore. is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.' . o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment. there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' o C. The project may result in one or IT\ore large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a positive "eclaration will be prepared..__ __."" . A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions ; r;; ~ @. ~ l] iE ~ C" .,1 :"jr-"'--"---;:"" ij r.;~;, ~ . iUU APR 3 Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Communications Monopole Site l....", Name- of Action ; i.-..._:. _, ",!."! ,-,", .. ., Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Sign.ature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date . PART 1-PROJECT INFORMJ ON Prepared by Project Sponsor .\lOTlCE. This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant eft, on the e-nVlronment Please complete the entire form, Parts ^ through E. Answers to these questions will be consider as Pdt: 0i the appllC..H1on ror approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide .lnv additio, Informacion vau belle...e will be needed to complete Parti Z andJ. It is e:\pected ~hdt comp1t!'clon or the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol ne~ studies. research or Investigation. It information requiring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate and speci edch instance. . NAME OF ACTION Bell Atlant~c NYNEX Mobile Communications Monopole Site LOCA TION OF ACTION (Include Slr.et Address. MunicIpality and County) 24850 Main Road, Orient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLlCANTISPONSOFl Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Communications I ACDRESS 60 Herricks Road CITY/PO Mineola BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 739-4622 NAME OF OWNER rlf ditter.nll Mark and Mary Beth Phillips ADDRESS 217 4th Street CITY/PO ZIP CODE Green ort 11944 oeSCAfPTlON OF ACTION Lease of an approximately 1,800 square foot vacant parcel to construct a 100 foot monopole for cellular antennas and an associated 12' x 40' unmanned equipment shelter. Lease area is located on a 10.54z acre former agricultural parcel. Tax Map No. District 1000 - Section 18 - BLock 6 - Lot 5. ZIP COOE 11501 Pleue Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. If not applicable A. Site Description PhYSical setting of overall project. both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 Present land use: DUrban Olndustrial DCommerciaf OResidentiaJ (suburban) OForest OAgriculture lilOther former al1:ricultural field 2. Total acreage of project area: 10.54 acres. curren'tly vacant APPROXIMATE ACREAGE *Formerly agricultural PRE5ENTl Y Meadow or BrushJand (Non-agricultural) field and acres Forested nursery acres . * lU.j4 Agrrcultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of Eel) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) ORural (non.farm) and nursery AFTER .cOMplETION 10.49 . acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres 3. What is predominant ,oil type{s) on project site? Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes a. Soil drainage: IiJWell drained 100 % of site OModerately well drained OPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involveq. how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 land Classification System? 10. ~4 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? DYes egNo a. What is depth to bedrock? ~ 400 (in feet) (monopole and equipment shelter) acres 0.0<; (.HaA) % of .site through 4 01 the :'-IYS \ 2 .' 5, Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 1l!I0-10% 100 C!1 5 % or greater site. or district. listed % 010-15% % 6. Is. project substantidlly contiguous to, or contain a building, Registers of Historic Places? DYes (iaNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? 17'!:. (in feet) % on the State or the National DYes il!INo 9. Is site located over a primary, prinCipal. or sole source aquifer? il!IYes DNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as thre.atened or endangered? DVes ~No According to !=;i tP- in~Dection Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations] DYes ~No Describe DVes e9No . 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes IXlNo If yes, exp.lain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes rnNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributal')' N/A ( 16. lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? IKIYes DNo aJ If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connectionl 'IlDYes DNo b) If Yes, will.improvements benecessary to allow connectionl ElYes !JNo \on-site improvements) 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? DYes IXlNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECl, and 6 NYCRR 617?' DYes /lilNo N/A b. Size (In acres) 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes lKINo B. Project Description 1. PhYSical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: 0,0, acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 10.49 acres. d. length of project. in miles: N / A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of o{f:street park ing spaces existing 0 : proposed U^ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/ A One Famiiy Two Family Multiple Family '.05:t acres. to be leased. -~... acres ultimately. ;f; ...... 0.05 N/A 2 %; *One to two trips . per montn to inspect equiproont Initially Ultimately Condominium 40' length. 100' 12' i. Dimensions (in feeO of largest proposed structure height; width: j, Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? N/A *Monopole is 100 ft. in hSight - equipment shelter ft. is 12 ft. x 40 ft. J \.Vil1 diHurbed areas be recldlrr.ec' -, --~.~ ,...,.....J . !:!Yes uNo egN/A a. It Yes. ror wh<1r inrenG . P'",dpose is the site being reclaimed? b \\':11 ("psoil be stockpiled ior reelamatio';' DVes DNa c. \,Vill Upper subsoil be stockpiled /or reelamation? OVes DNa . oJ. Hm.... m.lnv ...lcres or \,egeration (trees. shrubs. ground covers) will be removed from site? 0.05* 5. Will any mature rarest (o,er 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes ~No *~lil!il!l and acres. 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: N/ A a. Total number oi phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 3 months, (ineluding demolition). (number). month month DVes . year. (in'ciuding demolition). year. . 8. Will blasting occur during constructionl :JYes 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DNa I1!No ? ; after project is complete o DYes IlllNo If yes. explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? aYes lENa a. If yes. indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial. etc.J and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes IlllNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase ordecrease by proposall DYes I!9No Explain 1 S. Is project or anv portion of project located in a 100 year flood plainl DYes I1!No 16. Will the project generate solid wastel DYes ilNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes. will. an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes . DNa c. If yes. give name ; location d. Will any wastes nol go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfilll DYes DNa e. If Yes. explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposall b. If yes. what is the anticipated site life?" DYes KlNo tons/month. years. 18. Will project use herbicides or. pesticIdes? :;Yes lBNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)l DYes 'IENo 20 Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? . DYes 21 Will project result in an increase in energy use' il!lYes DNa If yes. indicate type(s) Electricity IlllNo iJ" .,..... 23. 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumpIng capacity o N/A gallons/minute. Total anticipated water usage per ddY gallons/day. DYes I!9No 24 Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? If Yes. explain 4 -.----------.-." ,"- _.. C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? IiilVes ONo If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment Ozoning variance GilspeciaJ use permit Osubdivision Dsite plan " Onew/revision of master plan O~esource management plan Oother 2. What is the zoning c1assification(sJof the site? R-80 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Five single-family homes on overall 10.54 acre property. 4. What is the proposed zoning of the sitel N/ A S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A . 25. Approvals Required: City. Town. Vi'lage 80."d City. Towr.. Village Planning BOdrd City. Town Zoning Board City. County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies . DYes DVes ~Yes DYes Ii1lNo 62No ONo IiilNo ~No IENo ll!INo ll!INo Type Submittal Dale eVes OVes OVes OVes -3PC::r~C11 By... F.....u..:.l [VA. Pub ~c Ut~lity Structure 6.." Is the proposed. action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land USe plans? iCVes 7. . What are the predqlllinant land use(s) and >:.anlog classifications wjthin a 'A mile radius of proposed action? land uses; res~dent1aL. commerc~aL \gas stat10n and landscaping company), agricutlural zonin2: R-80 & B (Genera.l Bu~d ness) . 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjOining/surrounding land USes within a 'A mile? 9. I f the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N / A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization{s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation. education. police, fire protectionll OVes iCNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? OVes ONo 12" Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic signilicantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? OVes D. Informational Details ONo /flVes ONo KlNo DYes ONo iCNo "''''' . ~:?i. .~~ Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any aJverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid rhem. Signature If the ~ction is in the Coasta' with this .lssessmenl. u~ t9 the best of my knowledge. biLe by Freudenthal &" Elkowitz .. ons111t'~T'lt- Date itle President seney, co,"plete Ihe CO.lst.1I Assessment Form before proceeding 4/2/97 5 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS A~~fFO/;~ ors:s.o. "" ,\':'l:l ~_."'. Ys .~: .~ 0 :"" '\ '~<f.l _ ~ , - ~ 'Z> ,.,., :' '" J. . ~.: "".~ ~~., ~ 'O.f .z. i-~,-f/ ""~:yy Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765.3136 Telephone (516) 765.1938 . PLANNING BOARD MEMBL J RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . , April 1. 1997 . Daniel Falasco. P.E. Savik & Murray 2110 Smithtown Ave. Ronkonkoma. NY 11 779 Re: Proposed site plan for Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile SCTM# 1000-18-6-5 Dear Mr. Falasco: : The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday. March 31. 1997: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this Type 1 action. - Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely. ~~~;w: v5- Bennett Orlowski. Jr. Chairman ~ -,.. ~.. - \ - ~ .. ,.. . \ \ ((l(1 (10. L66t Stqss:;l e \ - - ...,. ...~ C?J f11d 1'J \ - s.:,,66t ", M (~/~~~ \ ~i_w ~ {i- , \ - .~ ~ ~- e ,. '.~, ,......,;.. , -I ,. , ' I L.N.N. 71996 � SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNINGBOARD I TAX LOT 7 / TAX LOT 8 TAX LOT 14.5 TA ( LOT 14.9 � I I (S 37`10'50" E) 1157.25' I o 0 N TAX LOT 6 ^ REPUTED TO BE LAND W On FORMERLY OF STROHMEYER, � I FORMERLY TERRY, W NOW OR FORMERLY OF � WASHBURN Pp x^o Q � x°y o° a (S 3710'50" E) 165.00' v Q ry 1c4 O x uryo' � SET �S try NAIL / a N x x TAX LOT 26.8 W 2a 03 04 N ryha o/ TAX LOT 5 71 0 0 neo^ W µ op 0Oct CONC. CURB 2 CY / CATCH BASIN " V A C A N T " �j U' try J W \ uryo W W W NW h b/ UTIL. POLE _ D Ent Z N.Y.T. #165 V brO x so' ^cry FND.G^o' 142 ' CALC. STAKE SET I STONE (N 3740'20" W) 14225.5. 775' DEED NAIL TAX LOT 4.1 I TAX LOT 26.9 M IREPUTED TO BE LAND FORMERLY OF KARCHER, M NOW OR FORMERLY OF ANDERSON , t FND. MON. PLATT ROAD GENERAL NOTES MAP OF PROPERTY "UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO A SOF Ek, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY SIDE Of MAIN ROAD N 1. BEARINGS SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS PER SURVEY MAP REARING A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR'S '1. NREAL ; A VIOLATION or ARTICLE iia. SECTION � S. Tp�, O SITUATED AT: DEED REFERENCE: LIBER 9584 PAGE 472 yzoe, susowlsioN z, OF THE NEW voR% STATE ORIENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. EDUCAIION LAW' \� t O + 2. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DESIGNATION' •capie, tram tine anginal of this eurvev map Pr 7`4 SUFFOLK COUNTY, N .Y. O DIST. 1000 SEC. 018 ELK. O6 LOT 005 not n irked with an anginal of the Ian s ^.k d rvey at Inked seal d his embaseed y" �, CARMAN — DUNNE P . C . shall got be considered a valid en true copy 0 3. POSSESSION, IF ANY, NOT SHOWN. ^term action Indicated hereon rsignify that C d this survey was prepared in accordance with 04 CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS the - sting Code of Practice for Lord Surveys 4. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN SUFFOLK cdcpt.d by the New York State Aasonatico of 2 Lakeview Ave 44 e, Lya:t&`ook, New York 11563 Professional Lord Surveyors Sald -- N COUNTY DATUM (AMSC). cerHf oilers shall run only to the person (516) 599-5563 Fy X (516) 593-4873 r for whom the survey is prepared, and on his behalf to the title company, governmental Ddte: , p agn ent. and lending institutio - . m eertie an.ra ora not transferable to JULY 18. 1996 RAYMOND P.LS 049350 Oi adtldi, nal robtutle's or sub....ant owners.^ sItsScale: of 1 9 l" = 50' Project No. : 9601715 Sheet .1 0 0 U V h. A� r f 8041 - , wo q oW m. a' 'I @Bell AcF , , i 2000 CORPORATE DRIVE , ORANGE BUNG , NEW YORK 10962 - 2624 I MOBILE 2',No COMMU 'k C*1111 � ' ELL SITE MAIN _ ROAD ( ORIENT PT. SEARCH ARE � A ) , SOUS HOLD , NEW YORK �`j0 `UE DOAGRAM AREA MAP K-11 ' If OF DRAWMS G DDESSC�G3� G�'` WN �, °i (�Z.! ' f s7J na. rn. o , 1 RAST- A ON "��" t-viI C MIR AI 0 R / B N P kI SITE PLAN, CONSTRUCTION PLAN tijl D I I Bagt x' A R o R ELEVATION AND CABLE SCHEDULES 1 A � DETAILS i M� Cl .. urH w Brown#P1 SPECIFICATIONSa � � I t.;-cepa ,.r '; 50 0 3 1 ` R ISLAND _ . Pe Leri Neck Pt y �syn J-- "- Ntlo�o'�Fn RNVM SHELTE .� � PECIFICATI®N N r FQUIPMCM SI IFI IFR `"ffnyBtac Pt n AND MUNI)P01_F . , � OR/EN �'� SPECIFICATIONS " 4 - Lyng Be ck Pt 111111 D I Pr ` Lµ Cornelius ii Ne/ ilia u COU r p �j�} /�p ! CLUB 1 {d r I •° I�; ' I , o UTILITY SITE PLAN, GROUNDING PLAN AR9® ®E�'All�S • r_ ELECTRICAL DETAILS AND RISER DIAGRAM ELECTRICAL i� ' ' nMea,ePr. ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS ELECTRICAL SPECIFIC k ` }, ^ q l Lt Mtls uLrirl , � NORTH M l34@ tl'ORE9-6 M9�ET' lis Rem'Nead� ;I �rb' ConydogaPY Af 1't? r, A agA d °' d9 b tNsl _ z NO,, 51 I—� ppII�� R( )NJECT NO,, � wit AV colt N`j1d,10 VA 0 1 Y J I CONSULTANTS INC . 12-12 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SETAUKET, N.Y. 11733 VOCE (516) 68-9-84-1 89 0450 DAiA (516) 689-8459 ENGINEERING — TECHNICAL SERVICES — CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SMITE M 3555 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY RONKONKOMA. N.Y. y7gwf, ` r (.51 B) 99 '1 -.3990 FAX ' 516)'i 9817M71 tERED Ave 3 rF4 n. rn *:4"triA ta�Yl1. 1 GIADWGSV96-723VA-1 IO-3-96 10:0819 arl EST TAX s70_1. 7 / TAX LOT Y rnx_LOT_LIE :, Tax u<LT.ia.S 1157.25 �l (S_3_7 10' 50° W) _ C4 1 18X LOT 6 6'-0" RIGH GAL V. STEEL CHAIN LINK REPUTED 10 BE LANG -, - FENCE AND 8'-0" LOCKING LATE AS FORMERLY CIF STROHMFYFIR �(,� INDICATED SFE TYPICAL. DETAIL 2/A-2. • � I FORMERLY TERRY, OO ' 11 '-8" X 40' O" PRE-MANUFACTURED „ O NOW BU FORMERLY / 2 EQUIPMENT SHELTER BY "FIBREBOND" WAHBURN ' ti' � Y --�-- SS CONTRACTOR TO F'EFER 10 MANUFACTURERS CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO COORDINATC CONC. FOUNDATION AND — —-- -_ -- --- __— OTHER REQUIHEMh NTS !A�LQ (S 3T 10 r 50r E) 165.00' /� _ I -,- 100'-0" HIGH MONOPOLE BY ' ENGINEERED W - `� ENDEAVOR` 'JURPORAIED' CONTRACTOR TO / w SLI- NAIL- --�l � �--- 10' WIDE i)RnVEI_ AC;OGS`� i cJ - " i REFER TO MANUFAi;I URER'> (,ONISHROCTION , DRIVE SEE DETAIL 3/A-2 - DWGS AND SPT ')IFICATIONS FOR EXACT SIZE I ry -_--_- -- - - - ANG TYPE. -,EI DOLE BELOW TAX LOT_5 I cV Act F5s VFHWI T TURN ---- -- 20' - 5D' AROUND rrP �F�/ 'VACANT' . I PAVEMENT w d - Nw /Q1, - - L) , m 1 r, 1 'SEI (JAIL - j FND STAKE � ;-- FIND STONE l1425.87' CALC. 1425,75' DEED UT1Lmr POI F (N 37 40' 20' W) Nb 165 _._ _-_ L—Q�1 — -- - ---- - -- -- - -- -. - LQNCI fUDFF. 72' 17' 43.5" TN aq GENERAL NQTF_ ,p. /' 1" REPUTED TO BE LANG ,n�I,I-ljl)f_-' 41` OS' 42.9 -- - `+K\, 7 H J - FORMFRLY OF KARCHER, 1 , BEARIPI�;S SHOWN IN PAI LIPA(3F � DFfD - _-_ __- GAMMA � qIP A REFERENCE TIBER 9584 342- NOW OR FORMERLY OF ANDERSON 2 SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX M N, A LINE CONNECTING (2) NAILS SET IN PAVING101D�sT IDDD, Scc Q16, L Dus �� MAIN RU IS N 32 47' 59.2" W OL IRUL- 1RO� ® 3 P05AII•SJON, IF ANY, Rt4. ELEVA1EONs `,HowN NEKTunIn.E. NORTH U',1= THIS HEADING TO DETERMINE BE A COUNT)f DATUM (AMSC) Q,E( TOR f)RIFNTATfON. SEE PLAN ABOVE. z22 NORTH ( 1 ) SITE_ PLAN -- --- -- ---- -- ---" PIAN FOR AN SEL ADJACENT L 100.0' -- AMSC 120.1 AG r - � � ��----- CONCRETE ENTRANCE I'IA?FORM FOR TYP ANTENNA AND CABLE SCHFDUI_f _ T.0 ANTENNA " UCIAR SFE x.,,'A--2. (SFC NOTES THIS SHEET) ._ r)RII PJTP:I E SEE "' O" iOCLABIE i,.gTL__X 40• -0' � - - __ ___ —_[FENC LI- _____ __ V tY ^� `' , r MONnYUI_E MANNER -_-_--- __ .-- -. _--_ - A Ii'-8' X 40--O" PRC- MANUFACIURED W1S FO-_ D R�_, ANTENNA LABI L ANTENNA CABL! ANTFINNAOSHEI BION AIF ANTENNA AMSC 103,9' AGL 83.8' C]UI NUMBER NUMBER SY`.;TEM TYPE N0. TYFE - N i' �� \{ :r'- M!iLI FOR DFTAIIS,' PMENT 7VELTEE BIY MABRE TURF - `Y > TO. AN- TH ''�,CONTRAC )R R F R P _RS i- r F-I. 'Yr �C {�. EV'6 AI=' FOA: AL1_10 CO RDI N DRAWINGS AND DATIOCATINNS (1W 1 FX GF5 15PD >PUF IF 0 LP 3 12 ANICNNA - - ' � D) COORDINATE CON( f i)UNDATION AND - 3' END END .� � --� e 1 1 A ' --O 1- --50A - -M .. A - 95' ALP `�� AMSC- 1018' AGL 81.6' vfY � �I. 1 OTHER REl_JIREMFNTS _ 1 -- - _— _ - - ` -__O ANTENNA Cl ALL SECTORS Y 2 b LSPDM LSPDF AIF-0 95' ALP OJ 1 7 + % - WALL MOUNTED A/C UNIT" BY ;HF.I_TF_R 2 :-WHl ATX-0 LDF5-SOA / �� MANUE IYP i 3 r �V AMSC 100 i' AGE 80.0' FUTURE __- - _ _ _ F� _ _ _ _ T.U. MONOPOLE 4 I--WH ARX-1 LDF5--5OA LSPpM ED )F AIF-O 95' ALP 'J212 [.j (,RAVFL ACC E5S DRIVE I I L6PDM LSPDF AIF-0 'd 5' ALP ')21'C SEE PARI ',ITE PI_AI'J __ _-.— ___—__ __ ea g BI LI SRX- U LDF5-SOA --- - _ _-- _ \ AHUVE FOR EXA(,l Y" NC�E � _-- -�_-- -- i; 6 '1 H1 IT BTX-0 LDF5__5OA L9PDM V,PDF AIF -U 95' ALP 9212 \\ '� LgrnTIOPJ -- - - / FOR DETAIL AND DIMENSIONS r� __ ._.-_ ____-. - - - .___._ _ / H MONOPOLE SHELTER FOUNDATIOIN SEF 1 A-?. `� nITURE o ENDEAVORS GINCORPORATED'� CONTRACTOR TO / ri - - --- ---- -- - - ---- --- - -------- T _ _ 'T o D) REFER TO MANUFACTURERS CONSTRUCTION b'-0" HIGH GALV eJ 8 4 -BTU BRX- 1 LDF5-SOA L5 GM LSPDF AIF-O 95' ALP 9, 12 m �� DWGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EXACT SIZE m � " m q> - AND TYPE. CHAIN LINK - -� _0 9 FUTURE FENCE RNLI t3'-O'" 4--_ ---_ _ _ __ _ _ �� -- 10 f UNJRE ____ ___ ____ ____ _-__— - ____ __ ___ ---- - - PIPE COLUMN CABLE iTRAY SUPPORT - _ �� '" a EQUIPMENT SHELTER BY MANUFACTURED I ,)CHJNC. GATE A`' �i � ARM ASSEMBLY FOR ROUTING ANTENNA a r� CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO MANUFACTURERS INDICATED SEE rl I CABLES FROM EQUIPMIENT SHELTER TO = 11 1 UTIIRE -__ - CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS 1 n IY4'LLN OFfAII_ +/A-2 _ - - - _ � I N R z r - '�> - MONOPOLE COORUINAIIE EXACT LOCATION - FOUNDATION AND -r �?, 12 f--IIURF: OTHER REQUIREMENTS „ I WITH LOCATION 9F HATCH PVQC V.LF - �o -_-__ - _ ,,2 „ �. SEE DETAIL 4/A-2 NOTE'S . .. --- --- -- E IL C. 1) MARK CABLE ENDS DURING INSIALLATION, i.e. "2-YET" MARK WITH [2] G' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE - OF CABLE WITH BRAS` TAG ENGRAVED WITH ANTENNA SYSTEM MARK EACH CND \ BAND: YELLOW TAPE AT COMPLETION OF INSTALUATION F OF HEL ER ROOF -- -- ---- --- 100'-O HIGH MONOPOLE E1Y' ENGINEERED -� STF_M DESIGNATION. p - LIN _ S T Er1DEAvoRs INCORPORATED" CONTRACTOR 10 _E_N_LARGED ANTENNA LAYOUT PLAhJ r SEE MAN . DWG e- -- ---;a- - REFER TO MANUFACTURERS CONSTRUCTION 2) CABLE LENGTHS SHOWN 1-OR ESTIMATING PURPOSES OPIIY CONTRACTOR SCALE 1%4"= 1 '-0F, S AND -ONTRACTOH TO 'I"---------"? x / DWGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EXACT 97E SHALL FIELD MEASURE, C.LIT AND RECORD. MECH DWGS — OVIDC 4" CRUSHED 18, 8' VIE- F�'-O AND TYPE SEE NOTE BELi)W. 5) COVER CABLE JOINTS WITH "3M COLD SHRINK AS MANUFACTURED FOR - S1C1NP. GROUND COVER _ _ _._____-.----.- - / _ WITHIN LEASED AREA / � _ DESIGN ANDF'h WS TYP. ---�% — FOR ANTENNA ORIENTATION ENLARGED BY MONOPOLE MANUE. -- --- -- -- 7 �- - --- C CONCRETE CARSON, DIAGRAM SEE ADJACENT. REFER TO MONOPOLE - MANUE. DWGS FOR EXACT MOUNTING DETAILS. MONOPOLE AND ANCHOR-- - ---- -- --- -------.-- -- BOLTS SEE MANUE \ r t i.i AGE 0,0' 4LIOE-S: DESIGN DWG's, ALIGN 1 IT K, THE LRLCIOR"S RLSPONSIBILIIY 10 INSURE THAT ANCHOR BOLTS AS ) ' AMSI 20.1_' ALL PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES UTILIZED DURING INDICATED TO ORIENT GR-ADC- T' ASSEMBLY AND LRECTION WORK REQUIRED ON THE ANTENNA AND PLATFORM C) J P MONOP01_E. DO NOT gNDANGER THE SAFETY OF ANY AS REQUIRED V I F. Ct . L_--. - - - - _ - __- _ - - - - _J '. PERSONNEL NOR THErS1RUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE TOWER LINE OF FOUNDATION BELOW / 7. THE ENGINEERING DESIGN OT THE ANTENNA POLE AND SEE 1/2/A-'2. � NOTE ITS FOUNDATION SHALL BE BY OTHERS. DOCUMENTATION MONOPOLE ORIENTATION -PLAN REEL E CELL SITE IN ALLATI JAREA) ------ ---- _ MOBILE CELL Sl1E INS A BO IFOR ADDITIONAL SITE INFORMATION SEE SITE PLAN 1/A-� Of THE DESIGN SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY )� SCALE 1/4" = I'-0" CONC. CAISSON, SEE MONOPOLE , i MAIN RD. (ORIENT PT. SEARCAND CONCURRENTLY WITH THESE DOCUMENTS. MANUE. DESIGN DWGS- SOUTHOLD NEW YOR - 3 THE ENGINEERING DESIGN (1F THE PRE MANUFACTURED DOUTP. SHELTER SHALL BE BY OTHERS. DOCUMENTATION OF THE DESIGN SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY LONGITUDE: 72' 17' 43.5" AND CONCURRENTLY WITH HESE DOCUMENTS. NOW 3 ORIENTATION PLANS 4 PART ELEVATION 41' 08' 42.9 SCALE R - ,'-D" NNA LAYOUT PLAN -- =- - ( 2 � PART CONSTRUCTION PLAN ANTE SCALE AS `- -' SCALE: 1/S' = 1'-q -- ---- - ------ ------------ ------ ---_- Drowin Description --- - Seal ,.,, Oote: Scale: Drawing No: ----- -------- Project location. P EMRil _ - Q Atlantic } /�} /� C = �+y E(JI.p AAtL'/ ^ Bwn By9 he NOTEDBell Atla I is NMEA Mobile WCn o�"n= urf F'C`C OmwSRS n By, Checked B/: /� -- - SITE PLAN, CONSTRUCTION PLAN '`' `I(`" TRT A 1 9-20-96 ISSUED FOR FILING MOBILE CELL SITE INSTALLATION CONSULTANTS INC. LI::.:r�;,', ,, Project No. 9e-723s '- -- MAIN ROAD ORIENT P1 . SEARCH AREA) ti -''T ,; 9sas3 - 9-G6-96 ISSUED FOR DANM 100% REVIEW ( ELEVATIONS AND CABLE SCHEDULES CNGINECRIHG - TECHNICAL SERVICES - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 2 T � C -7 :S�Z SDUTHnLD, NEW YORK SLIDE M• 3555 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY RONKONKOMA N.Y. 11779 FJ, aisov4 i� 8-22-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 60% REVIEW f amu Project No: 'Shaet Of ---- ¢-w Roman Mrv6 mwuc KY.am•ram 610 u @W.Mu 00 ural» ---_- (511-) 98 -3890 FA% (518) 98I-3971 1 2 III Reviaion - -Date Description -- r--- - --- - -----`-'- - ;-- _ at a ,soP �l G \])WGS\96-723\A-2 9-6-96 12.06708 pr EST l " "bunV.,, fi --- � - - - - - - - 11 9----- r, i LINE OF RE y� I SHELTER SET ON-MANUFACTURED NEW P.C. POI FOUNDATION PROVIDE 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT h N / I 11'-B" _ I BETWEEN GONG. ENTRANCE PAD AND AND SLAB. SEE MANUFACTURERS CONST. TN, SEEDWGS FOR AITACHMENT AND EXACT I" FOUNDATION AS INDICATED. SEAL MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICALOCATE "T' HOLD DOWN TIONS TANDSCONSTD DWGS 2" CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. ---- � OVER WITH SILICONE SEALANT, ' - y t• ��q FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. TYP FOR (4). —� LINE OF PRE-MANUFACTURED EQUIPMENT — y SHELTER SET ON NEW PC FOUNDATION 6" CONCRETE PAD WITH 6" X 6" fir{•}d^s - I" CHAMFER 0 45' AND SERB. SEE MANUFACTURERS CONST. #10/10 WWF ON 6MI1_, VAPOR BARRIER DASHED LINE INDICATES LINE OF FOOTING BELOW TYP ® PERIML-7ER. I DWGS FOR ATTACHMENT AND EXACT OVER C STONE AND WELL COMPACTED,^ ' 'A v' , I CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. SUB BASE. r v, ' SEE SECTION AS INDICATED. c+ 4 j / ICONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE '4" GRAVEL MIN , / SLOPE ® 1/2' PER FOOT AWAY- FROM "T' HOLD DOWN BRACKETS BEYOND. - �— FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PROPOSED LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT, BY OTHERS SHELTER AND CONIC. ENTRANCE PAD. PRE-FAB. CONTROL BUILDING' CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL A5 INDICATED I A-Z TYPICAL FOR (4) LINE OF FINISHED F0LOOR NEW + f NEW POURED CONCRETE FOUNDATION AND SLAB -� ✓ J FOR NEW PRE-MANUFACTURED EQUIPMENT SHELTER. y_0" II/2' PRC-MANUF EQUIP. SHELTER "------ * 6" X 6" 10/10 WWF. ,"1Z''1,. VERIFY ALL CONS FRUCTION DIMENSIONS WITH 6" CONCRETE SLAB WITH G" X 6" #10/10 WWF ON - — 1/2" 5'-0" " " "` ,� 'i f� �* r 6MIL VAPOR BARRIER OVER G STONE AND WELL l rI MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. I' CHAMFER ® 4:i NP. © ---� COMPACTED SUB BASE. F 1e' yr 7 ONCRLTE SLAB TO BE LEVEL TO 1/4" OVER 10' _ i PERIMETER OF SLAB. 6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER (NP) ?"- 4" MIN GRAVEL C" COMPACTED STONE t I CONTRACTOR 10 PROVIDE 4" GRAVEL MIN "li11r'v.E 6" L VAPOR BE SLAB WITH G" X 6" N10/10 WWF ON I SLOPE 0 1 2" PER FOOT AWAY FROM i/4" PER FT. ti MIL VAPOR BARRIER OVER 6" STONE AND WELL I i PROPOSED LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT _ COMPACTED 'SUB BASE. -- �� _-_ __ m 'd —x --- x—.-=-x=-a--�x x --zx--,-=u---a,-r-n— < SHELTER. 'to NEW POURED CONCRETE ENTRANCE PLATFORM �� ,. _ _ 1 ,LOPE CSD 1/4" PER FT. AWAY FROM SHELTER o LINE OF FINISHED GRADE - �/ z rur SCE DETAIL 3/A-2. `\ o -�\_ WELL CC rMPACTED SUB-GRADE, SLOPE / 1f—lp : -I TI J Co 1/_'" PER FOOT AS INDICATED i to 'J_F ! �- / , III = —1 1 'NEIL COMPA. FLD SUB GRADC -- - - LINE OF FINISHED GRADE - y ' PROVIDE 1/I<" EXPANSION JOINT AS INDICATED I I 6 MIL. VAPOR BARRIER (TVP) =1 _ Ir % - Frill - 6CIWEEN HWLDING FOOTING AND CONE ENTRANCE / a - --- R __ —___�i / / ;_ - 'X4 r,UNI vt rWAY - I E — WELL COMPACTED SUB-GRADE, FAD, SEAL OVER WITH SILICONE SEALANT 2X4 CONI. KEYWAY i 111 I�1 6' COMPACTED STONE II s 11 r1n� PROVIDE N4 BARS 18' O.0 U III WELL. COMPACTED SUB-GRADE I— J PROVIDE #4 BAR, CW 18" U C - NOTL$_ ------ --- -" _ VEfi71CA,LLt', EXTEND BARS UP "SIT VFRIICALLY EXTENT) BANS IJP I R IS THE INSTALLERS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE }, THROUGH SIAB 4' AS INDICATEf lYP -� " ;/ i� 11HROUGH SLAB 4" AS INDICA TEO PYP d THAT ALL PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES ARE UTILIZED DURING ASSEMBLY AND ERECTION WORK ! '� REQUIRED ON THE MONOPOLE AN INSTALLATION — -- - - tir PROVIDE (}4 CUNT. BARS EQUALLY i OF THE SHEL II_R DO NOT ENDANGER THE I I PROVIDE �'4 MINI BAR; 1411AIEY � SAFETY OF ANT' PER;ONNEL NOR THE SPACED AS INDICATED. MAINTAIN 3 '�F'ACFU AS INDICATE-D MAINTAIN 9TR11C'TURAL INTEGRITY OF THE TOWER MIN UEAK FROM PERIMETER. • �� 1RIN .TEAR FROM PERIMETER.. /� IJNDISTGRRFD EARTH F ]HE ENGINEERING DESIGN OF THE PRE / ' A MANUFN1URFD EQUIP. SHELTER SHALL HE BY __ _�� NOTE �' � UNU1"JI1IRHFU LARTH � OTHERS DOCUMENTATION OF THF. DESIGN SHALL RCFfR lO CONSTRUCTION PIANS 1 ,3/A-1 RF- SUBMII R.D SEPARATELY AND CONCURRENTLY FOR FY (,CI LOCATION OF NEW FOIJN )AHON ���• WITH THESE DOCIJMFNTS AND 1 CIRC SITE REQUIREMENTS, , - - {' - E- - 3 ) SECTION CONC. ENTRANCE PAD ( 1 ) FOUNDATION PLAN - - -- -- - - - - ( 2) SECTION SHELTER FOUNDATION SCALP t/h" SCALE ,INE, - -0 IF �.I IPPORT WITH 3 Lr 4'-0" WILL r.A1E LEAF - h ' K STRANDS OF BARPFD V J' DEPTH OF 3/4" OUARRY STONE --- 9 \ //// n r ej OF 5/8" COMPACTED s #r DEPTH QUARRY >TDNE -- 1 1 S/8" TOP RAH L ----_-- -- LATCH N\PADLOCKINI, 3- _^' 011 If PIPE COLUMN, - LL , i C 5'-0' VARIES SEE ADJACENI SITE PLAN 3'-O" GALVANIZED `•TEEL MESH — PROVISIONS -" "--- ICE TRAY AND A'.hOC1AIED -- '� - nn h FI-NCING FABRIC � I � � BRACKETS AND HARDWAF.E BY � ADD DIAGONAL BRACE E NGINLCRINf L rJDFAVORS AH T DA. --' _ - i ' CM BOTH SIDFS OF GATE LINE AND t:ORNER PGS FS—� F + . s� - EIRAU_ ,ry 10'-0" I) C MAX , I (TVP) l -y i p GATE FRAME _. .— _ -- 5-1/2 DIA CALLS POSP' /TOP I I (����T=� (=1 1�f —�1�-1 = �� I—� I �.0 L WATCRI P.II .I _L4LAN1 —��� B•• B,• 1 S/8" BOT TOM RAIZ — _ _ _ o l _ I,;,LL;,,) l,III III -II1=1 II--III-III= /.T' c HAMr LP. - - -- I-- +" GRAVEL---- II LII — \ �o t ^ _-- -- ( SOILED AND SEEDED 7- I ill- __IPL I - r II •� Ik iI. -� - - - - _ _ I : YIP- •I Y I -- L" CI CARANI;E COMPACTED SUBGRADF - �--� - - NTLS - ^7 V 1 -0" N CC1Ni REIT —.- - - •I �. \ 4' GNAVLL FU01NG _ 'I _ I --._ .— 1• 0" DIA, CONCR6T[ FOCTING _ /� E - I L• a .•I I '000 FSI r,lirLCRLFE 0 2,8 DAY'S —/'/ d4!ny , 711 - U ALL FENCE PO rs sFIaL_I BE IJ Des AIL 0 GRAVEL DRIVE = — x 5 0 SCI IEDULE 4U PIPE, SCALE_, N T S. 16" 0 SONUTUBE FORMED CONCRETF BASE _ ts, , A,1 T "ls. -T I's'I III lu,. ff5LAI tE (2 ) DETAILS CHAIN LINK FE AT �) DETAIL m GRAVEL DRIVE 4 ) SECTION PIPE COL. CABLE TRAY SUPPORT P'-- SCALE 1/2 = 1 '-0" SCALE: AS NOTED - ._ Sate. Dr*4 No -'-- ------- - - Project location' Drawing Deecnplian: = A,PED.4/rCyZT 8-20-98 AS NOTED v �esa TwwJ. Fp Drawn 9yl Ch'eckM Dy: a -:,': 419 � a. --- -- -- P� dpaLIM Bell Atlantic N MobileDETAILS , �. * SRS TNT 9-20-96 lssueD FOR. FILINGWILLIAMF NluWNSAMA MOBILE CELL SITE INSTALLATIONCONSULTANTS INC. � �;: � ProlooNa: 9-6-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 100% REVIEW MAIN ROAD (ORIENT PT. SEARCH AREA) ENGINEERING - 'TECHNICAL SERVICES - CONSTRUCTION MArµGEMENT y k• 95-1275 B-22-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 60% REVIEW �' �` C ~-{ Z T C T SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK sidle M.Jss, VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY' RUNKONKOMA M.Y. 11779 For,asn ,rJ. ^?' t)yr pntJyt r`S - I re-It rzowwr tmvr.srrwxer,xr,m3a.wnE csut weer».are rslry sere+» sl,�). 1� g r project No: . Sheet , ,Of, W Reviswn Dole Description (516) 961-3990 —T_ FAX (516) 967-5971 NL t 1 �. FTA DWL—iS\96 723\SC 1 9-6-96 12,37:29 plin EST - )0o a ° n. SECTION 00110 - INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR SECTION 01340 - SHOP DRAWINGS, PROJECT DATA AND SAMPLES Condition of Structures Bell Atlantic Nynex Mobile assumes no responsibilih for actual SECTION 02830 - FENCING h m w RELATED DOCUMENTS condition of items on structures to be demolished. SHOP DRAWINGS, PROJECT DATA AND SAMPLES Drawings, Instructions to Contractors, Supplementary Conditions and General Requirements, Submit shop drawings, samples and product data as requested b B A N M Conditions existing at time of commencement of contract will be mail tained Furnish and install aA complete Chain link fence system as shown on the drawings. 9 PP N y P 9 P P 9 Y ( ) 9 apply to work of this section and all other sections of this specification. to the Architect. Work of the affected section shall not proceed until the insofar as practicable. However, variations within structure may occur by on-going Fence fabric shall be galvanized steel mesh 9 o w' ..r�31+k'•W+ Architect has reviewed and accepted submittals. •Schedule a minimum of removal and salvage operations prior to start of selective demolition York. 9 gouge ed 2" openings, Fence posts shall h 2 1/4" outside diameter. ter sized steel, schedule 40„ s arid bottom , 14 {'. -• 1., , " SITE VISIT: 14 calendar days for Architect's review and response. Partial Demolition and Removal: Items indicated to be removed but of solo Ignoble value to lolls shrill be 1 5/8" outside diameter schedule 40. Fence posts shall be spaced Contractor may be removed from structure as work progresses. Transport iaivaged items A maximum of 10 feet 0 inches on center: •O.-raM1,„s5;, r Contractors shall visit the site at the proposed work and fully acquaint themselves with the SECTION 01400 - QUALITY CONTROL from site a^, they are removed. •*r job site. conditions as they exist, in order that any and all restrictions attending (fie work QUALITY CONTROL Provide three strands of barbed wire and support brackets at each post at top of are understood. Storage or sale of removed items on site will not be permitted. fence and gate. • y m All work shall be performed in a neat workmanlike manner, left clean and tree from All areas and dimensions are indicated on the drawings as accurately as possible, but all p 9 Y P Protection: Provide temporary barricades and other forms of protection as required ba Furnish and install swing gate and all necessary hardware and stiffeners required to conditions shall be verified by each contractor and/or sub-contractor at the site. The defects and completely operable. The contractor shall provide ail equipment as scheduled protect Owner's ersonnel and general public from injury due to selective & 7iolition provide a complete chain link ate installation. q on the drawings, All materials shall be new and all work and materials shall be uaronteed P p 9 P 1 ry P P 9 - tt failure of the rail not to examine or receive any form, instrument or document, or to b the contrator for o period of one 1 year tram the date of acceptance b visit the site shall nut relieve the contractor from any obligation with respect b5 his quor.:d Y p 1 Y P Y (B.A.N.M) Whether or not shown on drawings, the contractor shall provide all t.r' 'o bid pace miscellaneous items of equipment and hardware to famish complete, functional Provide protective measures gens as required a provide free and safe pas age of SF_a"TIl•N 03200 - REINFORCING Owner's personnel and general public to and from occupied portions t building The submission of a quotation shall acknowledge that the contractor and his sub-contnxtors assemblies, have full examined the site and know the existing conditions and are prepared to Proled from damn All reinforcing bar details shall conform to the latest ACI code and detailing manual. 'lj"+ k' Y 9 I P All work shall he careful) coordinated with all trades involvcd and the, contructor shall ge existing finish work that is to remain in place nd be-_omen 9 .•'',r; ME operate under the conditions as they exist at the site and has included all necassuty items, Y exposed during demolition operations. provide proper connections, fittings, valves, piping, etc for all equipment Drawings are All bars shell be deformed new billet steel conforming to ASTM A615, grade 60 Wire ',E(-TION 00800 - `d1PPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS to be considered diagrammatic and do not necessarily indicate the actual location or rnesh reinforcement shall conform to ASTM A185. routing of equipment, in and ductwurk Drawin shall be followed Protect floors with suitable coverings when necessary P ' J 9 F piping 9 gs as closely as ADJUSTMENTS OR CHANGES IN THE WORK gondi[ians allow to complete the intent of the ::intra.-[ The contractor shall sutiniil shop Equip partitions with rustproof doors and security locks Provide all necessary accessories to hold reinforcing securely in position a gjyA`Y'Fw,r,1.r drawings of items as requested by (B.A.NM) ? 'k Contingent to the Controctar/Bell Atlantic Nynex Mable Agreement (B A.N M), where adjustments a raeoranca of mole reinforcing from adjacent surfaces unless shown otherwise shall .i i` ^''y4't Remove protection at completion of war R. r chungos in the work (increases or decreases) are agreed to by (BAN.M) SECTION 01430 - SAFETY REQUIREMENTS' Lie M1t=el va and the Contractor, the cost for that work shall include' The actual cost (to the Damages Pram tl repair damages caused to adjacent facilities b demolih,n work at no i z "r),"r'��r• " Contractor for an installed items; Rental value of equipment if any); Wages of labels SAI ETI' REQUIREMENTS 9e' P Y P 1 Y A. Uniformed surfaces in contact with round or exposed to the weather! 3 inches. ` '.fi Sar I Y ( 7- cost to Owner. 9 P and Workmen's Compensation. N ,,'h;lii Attention is directed to Federal, Stale and Local Laws, rules and reguloticns concerning B. Bottom surfaces of slab on rade: 3 inches. + d �c;k'C 'I ronstructinn safety and health standards The company aweded a B A.N.M company Explosives: Use of explosives will not. be permitted. 9 } Overhead and profit for additional work performed by a sub-Contractor or directly by the P Y ( ) P Y — -- General Contractor Is limited to 15% of the increase in cost. Where the work is project shall insure that all workers work in surroundings or under conditions which are C clearance of main reinforcing from adjacent surfaces unless shown of erwi 'F'fI""+'* e sub-Contractor, an increase of Til% overhead and refit shall be allowed sanitary, and nip riot Hazardous or dangerous to his/her health or safety. Precautians shall Utility Services: Maintain existing utilities indicated to remain, keep in beryl( rind performed by a sub ante P be exercised at oil times for the protection of the persons and properly. H i; mandatory protect against damage during demolition operations, shall be 1 h se to the general Contractor. that the safety provisions of applicable Local Laws, OSHA regulations and Building and 1. Na 5 bars or smaller 1 1/2 inches i Consh-uchori Caries be observed for all contractors aril antenna riggers. Do not interrupt existing utilities serving occupied ,r used facilities, e :;ept when / Arad,"' t" The Contractor shall itemize each change in the wort. and provide bills of sale where gg authorized it writing by autharities having jurisdiction. Provide tempoi try 2 Bars larger than No. 5' 2 inches. 'r applicable. SECTION 01540 - TEMPORARY U11L111ES, services during interruptions to existing utilities, as acceptable to Bove ming g Where adlushnenls result in n decrease in the centrad sum, an amount for overhead and authorities D. Exterior wall surfaces: 2 inches. r _ ( v profit shall be added to such decrease, which shall be one,-half the amount allowed for Provide all required temporary utilities and pay all associated fees and operating costs PART 2 - PRODUCTS (Not Applicable) E. In all cases, not less than one bar diameter. ,rreases lender similar circumstances. PART 3 - EXECUTION ;CLiION 01700 - PRO.iCCT CLOSE-OUT Thi• ,-oniractor shall make available, for inspection b the architect all reinforcement 4EUTION O1010 - `,UMMARY Or WORK PROJECT CLOSE-OUT INSPFC:TION. Prior to the placement of concrete. The contractor shall provide a minimum of 2 days , ';.� s lis Sl1MMARY OF THE WORK nob-e to the architect prior to the placement of concrete - vg „ Remove all debris from site, clean floors and other exposed surfaces and mninve labels Prior to commencement of selective demolition work, inspect orem; in whwh Anel, will he Construct an unmanned radio equipment room Work shelf include "Clean” is defined to mean that which is expected for a first class building cleaning and performed. Photograph existing conditions to structure surfa:es, equipment r to loleronces for placing reinforcing shall be but shod nal be limited to. New fire rater) partitions; New fire-rated billow ntaintonunce program. Provide (BAN M) with Certificate of Ocnupan;Y surrounding�Properties which could he misconstrued as dcrnage resulting fro i selective �',c metal doors rind frames; New finish hardware, New floor finishes; New wall finishes, etc Provide (B A.N.M) with general operating/mainlanance instructions for all demolition wprk, fila with the (BA N M) project Engineer prior to starting writ A Plus 1/4 inch for members with an effective depth of 24 inches or less. installed equipment Install antennas, type and model as determined by UANM Furnish and install Motorola a Record Set of prints marked to show changes in the work caused P, b. plus i/2 inch for members with an effective depth of more than 24 inches. r supports, ckpe, brackets, cable trays, clamps, etc .., us required for a complete ontenna p 9 Y PREPARATION. unforsean conditions or di faction of the (BA N M) Project Mpnager Promdr >4 § installation, All bar laps to be minimum 40 bar diameters but not less than 20 inches. supplemental sketches as required Furnish This information to the .4rchde, t tr, Provide interior and exterior shoring, bracing, ,r support to prevent inoveme L s•tf lemic-nl '•q":d e"'"'-' Furnish and install an air conditionings stem as indicated on the drawin s, tom lete with utilize in preposition of Record Documents'" for (H A N,M) d p . or coflapse of structures to he demolished and adjacent fnnlihes to remain controls, piping and conduit, wiring and all mounting hardware , SET:1KiN Io)() - r,ONCRETE ° SNR ;CCTION 01 /40 -- WARRANTIES AND BONDS (Where Applicable) Cover and protsO furniture, equipment and fixtures ho remoi i from ,,odrnct i dunnage iG'.'>•'' � '�i Provide electric service to Phe tool, room in accordance with riser diagrarn on when demolition work is performed in rooms of areas from which such item , have not Electrical Gnuwings. WARRANTIES AND BOND`-, been removed All rnncnzla work shall conform to the latest edition of the ACI building. = radio room Coordinate with telephone company r ,- - II „err? 'rrahyrl Provide telephone service to re,iia .on . cord p f Y The Cunlroctor shall guarantee all labor and materials used in this pr ,J-cl lot a pend of Erect and mountain dust-pruoi portitions and ,,losures as negurred t., preven' spread of dust A , r- le work shall attain 4000 psi compressive strength at 28 days ;µc one Ilj your commencing front the dale of the issuance of the cetificate of 'whetantal or fumes to occupied portions of the building us listen below -X ;E+- TION 01012 - W(WE BY OTHERS r.orriplellon Any deficiencies that became evident during this one ( 11 yam period shall be Ready re,X tie corrested of the cuntrnctioCs expense Provide type "C' protection at all locations as required by pilo conddrr is -or as wOUh OY OTHERS p shown on the diowings" This shall tie 5 mil, fire retardant polyethylene aheejunq A Comply with ACI-301, ACI-304, and ASTM C-94. ,1' ` t-CHON 017;0 -- TENANT ;AFFTY NOTES with such note stamped on its fare The sheets ;hall he droped fro r i coding to I' a" Stell Atlantic Nynex Mobile may have work performed under sepurufe contracts flout and held firmly m place All seams of the sheehng are to be to red B Maximum time between introduction of water and placement to be 1 1/2 hours, r_,�Q noncurientl with the work of this contract, The coritract r shod perrinr oaess to the IFNANT SAFETr' NOTE-, Y project site for the 'contrnctor(s) employed under separate contract(s) to perforin their Loi rite, identify, stub off and discnnnec[ utility services [tial are nut mdicnle in C Minimum cement content shall be 6 slacks per cubic yard. 'ire," work. The contractor shall coordinate his work with the wnrh under separate c,nfruCA(s) Special precautions shall be taken by the contractor so thin. the conslnn,hon and the remain P Y �;" to ensun.� the proper sequence of cunstnicliou/inslallahon operations t!qugmrent funoshed on Thi; project and installation of same, shall not affecl the following ('Ss, Provide by- pass connections us necessary to maintain continuity nt service -i It Maximum water content shall be 6 gallons per slack of cement. 1 Tenant egress to and Pearn the building. occupied ureas of burldinq. Provide minimum of 7.t hours advance notice t vi I Maximum slump of concrete :hall be 4.5 Inches as determined b ASTM C-143 - Sf_C.1I(iN C11(116 - OWNEfi OCCUPANCY Owner d shut-down of service is necessary during change- over Y i v Flip solely o the niildim �7nx ir. and - ti . y f I N gconcretep ground or weather stroll be air entrained 1+:, OWNCI2 OCCUPANCY F. NI exposed to the Perlorrn selective demolition work m o syslemnh:: manner Use such method as trquiretl between 4-5 percent r During the ,.curse of construction, tho budding owner(s), his;her artist ,y.,ci s, suppliers, i Gbucturnl safety of the butdinq to complete wor4 indicated on Drawings in occordance with dennohtian schedu and - �t ° clients, tenants and visitor: shall continue to occupy [time structure. The contractor shall governing regulolanns r. Do not loud trucks above rated capacity or legal requirements which ever is schedule and ccordin<de the work accordingly 4 Na creation of noise outside the hours of 8'.00 AM - 6.00 NM tin L-ss the lesser amount. ev agreed Vo, in writing, with the properly owner in advance. Demolish concrete and masonry m small •wcb,ns, r'ut cone tele and it isnnry or Junctures with construction to remain using power -driven nias,nry sow it hanid (,old weolher concreting shall be in accordance with ACI-306 No concrete shall be ;Fi'TION 0'I OstS - CUTTING AND PATCHING S Bmtdmj security shall be rnauitained in order to prevent untruth" ri;cd mals; da not use power-driven import tools poured on Irozen ground CUtIING AND PATCHING persons from entering premises, or secured portions of the pt• mi,es. Locate demolition equipment throughout strucbn, and promptly icmove lebris k, The conbaelor shall prepare at least four concrete test cylinders from each day's The contractor shall perform elf culling and patching os learned to provide access by b Electnaty, gas, water and other realities as 'applicoblc, will ria h' event imposing excessive lands an supporting walls, floors or harmine pane Cylinders shall be Y installation of various parts of the work, All cumig shall be perfonned ns In minimize interrupted during construction I r •Y properly cured, stared and tested. Submit test results to the damage k, odjocenf surfaces. Patching of existing materials shall be performed in a neat Architect for review Provide services fol effective air and water pollution controls as require I by irnrnl and wnrkniunlike manner. All hales in nn.isonry or woad framed floor:, walls and ceilings Y Accumulation of dust The conlroctor shull leave work sire ileuri h the authorities having jurisdiction. Ihr,uyhoud construction, the concrete work stroll be adequately protected against damage excessive heat and f 9 9 _ xn pn,k r shall be core drilled or sow cut. Patching shall include the reshorahon of pointed surra-es end of each day due to e,.cessivo loading, construction equipment, materials or methods, ice, rain, snow, to match existing o IF unanticipated mac hamcal, electrical or structural elements whrGh conflict will intended reezing temperatures SPEC IICIN U_07U - 'SELECTIVE DEMOLITION function or design are encountered, investigate and measure both nature and ixhent of Line conflict Submit report to (BA,N.M) Representative un written, accurate detail Pendinig receipt Early drying out of concrete, especially during the first 24 hours, shall be carefully t SE('TION 01051 - EXISITNG CONDITIONS DtSCRIPTION OF WORK. of directive from (B.ATLM) Representutive rearrange •;elective demolition sched le as neeassay, guarded against All surfaces shall be moist cured or protected using a membrane curing ..'� ..y"" g t XI'iTING CONDITIONS to continue overall job progras^, without delay, agent applied as sown as farms area removed. If membrane curing agent is used, ° rY'r r?( Exlenl of selective Jam mlit.umn work id indicated ;tri drawuu7s All conditions and dimensions shall be verified by the contractor prior to the; start of exercise care not to damage coating construction. It is the contractor's responsibility to report, ria wriling, significant variation Related work sp--died elsewhere SALVAGE MATERIALS: Banding lack welding, cutting or substitute reinforcing other than as shown on the ; -cj�,,.,,;•+, or dircroponeies of the conditions noted or implied, to the Archilert it a nnediately upon rontruct drowing is prohibited unless specific approval is granter) in writing by the 'f; Remodeling construction work and patching is included on the dretwinrp Ord Salvage Items Where indicated on Drawings is "salvage-Deliver to (BANM.)' Architect � � discovery of such renditions, iey „ within the respective sections of specifications, including rmn,val of materials for carefully remove indicted items, clean, stare and turn over to (B A N M) r ° - ,tr re-use and incorporation int, remodeling or new construction. and obtain receipt. Term shall be built true to the lines and geodes designated. They shall be substantially rl+frr(va1 SPrJION 01060 - REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS constructed, strong, rigid, mortar tight, and adequately braced or tied. 'Forms shall `> 'I Relocation of pipes, conduits, iducis, other mechanical and electrical work are Where items are indicated to be returned to the building owner, rich iterns '.:r all be be designed and constructed to withstand all loads and pressures, includin those I -n r�, . REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS specified by respective hades elected and components and parts of such item shall be collected and provicud to the imposed by plastic concrete taking full account of the stresses due to the rate' of C' budding owner, pour, effective vibration and any conditions brought about by construction methods. - '•, , The, Contract Documents were prepared in accordance with the applicable local SUBMITIALS f urniwoik shall be ply-forms or metal forms such that concrete surfaces exposed ° 1'+Yz..j ' ', P : , n;-,`1.:x ,1 construction runes The sand Federal shalt conform Lo to these cedes and oHner applicable DISPOSAL OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS: to view shall be smooth All surface defects shall be rubbed to provide a smooth Local, Gty, County, Slate, and Federal Codes, Laws and requirements Schedule. Subout schedule indicating proposed methods and sequence of operations for texture and homogeneous appearance. selective demolition work to Owner's Representative for review prior to commencement Remove debris, rubbish and other materials resulting from demnlificn eperahor from SECTION 01063 - PERMIT FEES of work Include coordination for shrutoff, capping, and continuation of utility services as building site. Transport and legally dispose of materials off site. Ixtenw entryway stoops, stairs and ramps shall be broom finished perpendicular to P P H „ vr.v1 required, ingather with details for dust and noise control protection. the path of hovel and edged by tool, All exposed edges, and Corners' of concrete above A pkl PERMIT FEES work If hazardous materials are encountered during demoiitinn operations, cot iply with grade, riot otherwise specified on the drawings shall be chamfered. 1J' 'r.;';'�!:'iw,fr{5,G Provide detailed sequence of demolition and removal work to ensure rininterrupted applicable regulation, laws, and Ordinances concerning remavol, handling and Bell Atlantic, Nynex Mobile shall apply and pay for the Building Permtt. The contractor progress of Uwn Owner's on--site operations protection aqoinst exposure or environmental pollution. Concrete shall be conveyed, placed end finished in a good workmanlike manner. shall apply and pay for the Certificate of Occupancy The contractor shall obtain and pay M r •i le for obtaining all N for all other required permits and licenses. The contractor is resp unsb 9 JOB CONDI710NS Burning of removed materials is not permitted ca project site. Contractor shall bring to the immediate attention of the engineer any defects or errors In ,'.I yfA„,ao” inspections and certificates pursuant to the local construction code, e. New York Board the work. Prior to making repairs, the contractor shall obtain permission from. engineer of Fire Underwriters Certificate for Electrical Work. Occupancy: Owner and/or has tenant a will be continuous) occupying areas of the + ry / O y p. 9 CLEAN-UP AND REPAIR to make patches for other than minor honey combing. building" Conduct selective demolition work in manner that will minimize need for s , ry� j1 normal "i oho e. SE(,PION 01090 - fit FINITIONS AND STANDARDS disruption of Owner's or Tenant(s) rip til .-per n Upon completion OT demolition work, remove tools, equipment and demolished materials Contractor to coordinate requirements of electric, telephone, grounding line locations DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS from site Remove protections and leave interior areas broom clean and risers. Contractor to verify pre-fab building size and method of attachment., u Provide rninimum of 7'2 hoursi advance notir-e In the building Owner at demolition e o Contractor shall be responsible for the coordination of all trades and work. ; The learn "provide" means furnish and install complete and ready for intended use, as activities which will severely impact Owner's normal operations. Repair demolition performed in excess of that required Return structures ant surfaues to applicable tri each instance The term Architect' Or "Engineer" shall mean WJliarn F remain to condition existing prior to commencement of selective demolition wet. Repair All materials shall be stored to protect them against the elements. Collins, AIA Architect. Areas of the work designated to be done on overtime (out of hours) will be adjacent construction or surfaces soiled or damaged by selective demolition w, rk. ., 6 restored or otherwise made useable by the owner at the end of each work period, Provide the Architect with copies of the proposed design mix for approval and copies, of }a S' `k'q=•'f'• the trip ticket for each delivery of concrete ird' >:i.#. 1h ----- - -------- -- -- -- —` --------------- - a r �i Z ' 7 --- -- — Project location. Drawing Description r u-Seal Dale: $auk: Drawing No ED AR 8-20-9e,' AS,NOTED 'i --- -- ® Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile — ����sa iUky/Tt�� Drawn BY: .-beth[ ey: ".i' "f "I 9-2U-96 ISSUED FOR FILING _ aw ' e° elk — _ W��dAY� COUINS AIA MOBILE CELL SITE INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS e °r A� * SRS 1NT \ ��� r 9-6-96 ISSUED FOR BANTA 100% REVIEW MAIN ROAD (ORIENT PT. SEARCH I AREA) CONSULTANTS INC. �t ,-1 Project No se_723 . VV \R y4 ENGINEERING - TECHNICAL SERVICES - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT a('f96_1275f MM1e e . --- A 50UTHOL.D, NEW YORK ES ,, x . rwl r -- 8 22--96 ISSUED FOR BANM 60% REVIEW SUITE M•3555 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY RONKONI(OMA N.Y. 11779 ( m-te mro°naurcSullen.,War,am• mu so rM-0150us6u sew°ri (516) 981-3990 FAX 981-3971ievlsion Dote Dearrption �, arson° ��i O er Pro act No: 9Met, 11C A' ♦ a xv 1Yi - l Y 4P 1 e ff M If wr 1 . rv � ° A G:\PWG`.\95-723\SC-2 9-6-95 1137:23 pr1 EST 1 $ r 0. � Yfi PART 3 - EXECUTION Perform bond and moisture tests on concrete subfloors to determine if surfaces ore r i r 7 *Y'i. Install U-type trim where edge is exposed, revealed, gasketed, or sealant-tilled n Yi ao ° (including expansion joints). sufficiently cured and dry as well as to ascertain presence of curing compounds, i bECTION 09250 - GYPSUM DRYWALL EXAMINATION: SUMMARY Install control joints at locations indicated,or if not indicated, al spacings and To ations Do not allow resilient flooring work to proceed until subfloor surfaces are satisfactory 'y' i Examine substrates to which drywall construction attaches or abuts, preset hollow metal squired by referenced gypsum board application and finish standard, and approwfd by the Extent of each type of gypsum drywall construction required is Indicated on Drawings. frames, cast-in-anchors, and structural framing, with Installer present, for compliance with Architect for visual effect. PREPARATION: _ +��,tt ws", x, requirements for installation tolerances and other conditions affecting performance of _ This Section includes the following types at gypsum board construction: drywall construction. Do not proceed with installation until unsatisfactory conditions have FINISHING OF DRYWALL: Prepare subfloor surfaces as follows: - been corrected . Gypsum board screw--attached to steel fr6ming and furring members General' A oinf treatment at sum board Dints bath directions , flan es of corner Use leveling and patching compounds as recommended by resilient flooring manufacturer ' PPY 1 gyp 1 ( ) 9 for fillip small cracks, holes and depressions in subfloors INSTALLATION OF STEEL FRAMING, GENERAL bead, edge trim, and control joints; penetrations; fastener heads, surface defec'i s and g P DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING: 1 elsewhere as required to prepare work for decoration. Steel Framing Installation Standard Install .steel framing to comply with ASTM C 754 Remove coatings from subfloor surfaces that would prevent adhesive bond, Deliver materials in original packages, containers or bundles bearing brand name and and with ASTM C 840 requirements that apply to framing installation. Apply joint tape at joints between gypsum boards, except where trim accessories are including curing compounds incompatible with resilient flooring adhesives, paint, - ' n "#v identification of manufacturer or supplier. indicated. oils, waxes and sealers. r s+iyy �1 'I Install supplementary framing, blocking and bracing at terminations in the work keep them d and protected against damage from and for support of fixt�ires, equipment services, heavy trim, furnishings, and similar Finish interior gypsum wallboard by applying the following joint compounds in 3 oats Broom clean or vacuum surfaces to be covered, and inspect subfloor. tc ''i Snore matetjols inside under cover and k p dry P 9 ' ! surface contamination, corrosion, construction traffic and other construction to comply with details indicated and with recommendations of Ivry}4s4Du' weather, du eget sunlight, s (nal including prefill of openings in base), and sand between cants and after last coat s Neatly stack gypsum boards flet to prevent sagging. gypsum board manufacturer, or if none available, with "Gypsum Construction Apply concrete slab primer on exposed concrete slabs, if recommended by floorjng - muse N y IYP "` ° Handbook" published by United States Gypsum Co 6nbeddiny and First Coat: Ready-mix drying-type all-purpose or taping c impound. manufacturer, prior to application of adhesive. Apply in compliance with manufdcturer's Handle gypsum boards to prevent damage to edges, ends. and surfaces. Do not bend or direclinns. ,therwise damage metal corner beads and trim. Do riot bridge budding expansion and control joints with steel framing of furring members, Fill Second Coat. Read mix dr in, -1 e alf- ur ose or topping com,oi rid xP v independently frame both sides of joints with framing or furring members or as Indicated. (Second) Y- Y 3 YP P P PP 9 k INSTALLATION, GENERAL: ry �tF'u t Finish Third Coal: Read mix dr in t e all-purpose or to m cam au id F,; (Third) Y- Y q- YPtopping P In^,lull re uhernl flooring using method indicated in strict compliance with mgnufactureN's PROJECT CONDITIONS' INSTALLATION OF STEEL FRAMING FOR WALLS AND PARTITIONS, l ' 4 and maintain environmental conditions (or Partial Finishing. Omit third coot and sanding on concealed drywall construction which is printed Instructions Extend resilient flooring into toe spaces, door reveals, and into 3: Lnvucnmental Conditions, GeneraP Establish u licotion and finishing sum board to comply with ASTM C 84D and with gypsum Install runners (tracks) at floors, ceilings and structural walls and columns where gypsum indicated for drywall finishing or which requires finishing to achieve fire-resistanv� noting, closets and similar openings pP 1 gyp T drywall stud system abuts other construction. sound rating or to act os air or smoke barrier "crib, cul, and ht resilient flooring to permanent fixtures, built-in furniture and cgbinets, - a ar-3v board monufacb/rer's recommendations. Minimum Roam Temperatures. For nonadhesive attachment of. gypsum beard to framing, Where studs are installed direct) a /inst exterior walls, instoll asphalt telt strips � Y g' P PROTECTION: pipes, outlets and permanent columns, walls and partitions. maintain not less than 40 deg F (4 deg C) For adhesive attachment and finishing of between studs and wall. 10 de cl for 48 hours prior to application Provide final protection and maintain umddions, m o manner salable to Inslollei wh¢.hi Tighfly cement resilient flooring to subbase without open cracks, voids, raising and arypsum board maintain not less than 50 deg F ( q 1 P Installation Tolerances. Install each steel framing and furring member so that losteninq pucFermy nt joints, telegraphing of adhesive spreader marks, or other surface end continuously thereafter until drying is complete. ensures gypsum drywall construction being without damage or deteiiarabrm at lin e rf _ L?, surface do not vary more than 1/8 mch from plane of faces of adjacent framing Substantial Completion. imperreeUuns Hand roll resilient flooring at perimeter of each covered area to assure .."--ane Ventilate building spaces to remove water not required for drying joint treatment material-, adhwsinn. ''t`r" Avoid drops during dry, hof weather to prevent materials farm drying trio lucidly Install steel studs and furring m sizes and at spacings indicated but not less Ihan that t1° required by referenced steel framing installation standard SECTION 00650 - RESILIENT FLOORING INSTALLATION OF 111E FLOORS. ] ;'-�riji �&Si rcc '.fit' ON OF WORK: -i : PANT 2 - PROb lU5 fJL ..RIPTI Lay file Iroin center marks established with principal walls, discounting minor offsets, so ] ' 2 For single and double layer construction: 16 mil-res on center that file al opposite edges of room area of equal width. Adjust as necessary to avoid use MAN I F FC TURERf.,' e lads so that flanges Dint in itis some direction unit gypsum hoards can be Extent of o room ocarina and ac::has,, shall include new vinyl cam utriple fh rr file i Manufacturer Sub eel to compliance with requirement, provide products of Dna of the Install steel s g P nt cul widths less than 1/2 [Ile at room perimeters. Lay file square to room axis, unless j within rodeo room and new rubber base, within Uro room and around outside of Iew Otherwise Shawn i follawin9, installed in the direction apposite to that of the flange gypsum board partitions Steel Fromrng and I urring: d _ Frame door openings to comply with details indicated, with GA-219 and with applicable Match Ileo for color and pattern by using file from cartons in some sequence as ' ]'�' Bostwick Steel Framing Co. + Confradar to note that drawings call for vinyl wall base yenei ir,ally, All base is Ica le sl Inc published recommendations of gypsum board manufacturer. Attach vertical studs at jambs specified herein as Rubber Wall Rase nionufachwed and packaged if so numbered. Cut tile neatly around all fixtures. Broken, :. ir'7 Dale industries, Gold Bond Budding Products Div., National with screws either directly to frames or to Jamb anchor dips on door frame,s, ust011 Winner P cracked, chipped, or deformed tiles are, not acceptable ,"""��� -11 hack section (for cripple studs) at head and secure to jamb :,tads OUALIIY ASSURANCE Adhere the fluorin to substrates using Lull spread of adhesive applied in compliance with r Z Gypsum Co 9 9 P PP P ";r �e r Incur, Inc Tname openings other than door openings to comply with details indicated, or It none flooring manufacturer's directions. _ - -y f.�,, I Morin,, Industrie:; Corp g p gs; and install fr<unui below sills of Manufacturer: Provide each type of resifrent flooring and aceeseones as produc, i by ai United Store,, Gypsum Co, indicated, On same manner as re uired for door a enin 9 single manufacturer, including recommended primers, adhesives, sealants, cind lev ling .A,`"N( openings to match framing required above door heads INSTALLATION ]F ACCESSORIES - $ compounds '� Gypsum Boards and Related Products Apply will Lase to walls, columns, pilasters, casework and other permanent fixtures in Domtar Gypsum Cc APPLIr'ATION AND FINISHING OF GYPSUM BOARD, GENERAL Flame ',priced: Not more than 7G per ASTM E 84 rooms ur areas where base is required. Install base in lengths as Ion as q g a practicable, with Georgia-Pacific Corp. preformed coeur Units, or fabricated from base materials with mitered or coped inside Gold Bond Budding Products Div , Gypsum Board Application arid Finishing Standard Install and finish gypsum board to Smoke Developed, Net mare than 450 per ASTM E 84. ` uxner s. lightly bond has,,, to substrate throughout length of each piece, with continuous National Gypsum comply with ASTM C 840, Smoke Density Not mare than 450 per ASTM E 662 -on _t at honz-mtal and vertical surfaces United States Gypsum Co. _ r Locate exposed end-butt joints as for from center of walls and ceilings us possible, and PROJECT CONDITIONS', CLFANIPU; AND PROTECTION. 's STEEL FRAMING FOR WALLS AND DECKS stagger not less than 24 orches in alternate courses of board, lvo r. ., - Perf arm tollowinc o erations immediate) upon completion of resilient flooring; t ,'`v.r,;jrY,� c , e , P Y P P g 'Steel Studs, Runners, Joists, Metal Furring Channels: ASTM C 645, with Ilange edges of Install wall/partition boards in manner which minimizes the number of end-butt Fumis' or Maintain minimum tempo nlure of 6oF (18'C) In spaces Ic res resilient flaou lJ for A. i return and complying /P at least 48 hours prior to installation, during mstallauan, and for not less than r8 hours rf "`*lead studs bent back 90 deg and doubled over to for in 3/16 minimum Ip (return) PY J avaodc fhern entirely where possible. At stairwells and srrmtor high walls, install boards alter installation. Store resilient flooring materials in spaces where they will be ishillecl Sweet, or vacuum floor thoroughly. ' sea with the requirements for minimum thickness of base (uncoated) metal and for depth horizontally with end joints staggered over sluds. minimi is shown on drawinq: temperature of hours t areaswherework Is Subsequently, maintain m Instill exposed gypsum board with face side out. Do not install imperfect, daninged or in nal we.^,h has until time period recommended by resilient flooring _ manut ac4ver has elapsed to allow resilient flooring to become well-sealed in , °n 7� e Provide fasteners of type, maternal, size, corrosion resistance, holding dmrrp boards Bull boards together for a light contact at edges and ends with not more. Install resilient flooring and accessories after other finishing opurationc, including painting, adhes iva Fasteners YP ower and other properties required to fasten steel framing and furring members than 1/16 inch open space between boards. Do not force into place, have been completed Do not install resilient flooring over concrete slabs until ie latter p P P r ' f; - secure) to each other and to substrates involved; complying with rho recommendations have been cured and are sufficiently dry to achieve r bond with adhesive as deter by Oamp-rn,�p Haar being careful to remove black marks and excessive loll Y manufacturers for applications indicated Locate either edge car end joints over supports, except in horizontal applications, where resilient flooring manufacturer's recornmended bond and moisture test. of gypsum drywallPp .'. intermediate supports or gypsum board back is provided behind end Jourts k inxi, Renarve any excess adhesive or other surface blemishes, using appropriate cleaner recommended by resilient floating manufacturers. 1 i -3hIn, t" i,YPoi iM BOARD PART 2 - PRODUCTS Position boards so That like edges abut, tapered edges nyoinst tapered edclei and mill-cut Prafe,,t homing against damage during construction period to comply with resilient . ' r' ,,C Ips Lengths available to "e re t requirements, provide products of on i of the ci ,' , mer it ) 1 types indicated in maximum len - - ;f t Manufacturer Sub _ct to camphor with .q p f fl-r ui °��facturer's directions. General Provide gypswn board a yp 0 or held wt ends against mill -cut or field-cut ends Do not place tapered sof p adorn. .0 1 9 a minimize, end--to-end joints. edges or ends Slugger vertical Joints over different studs on op pose Lr sides of p,vbtions fallawiny =y Appy Protective floor palish to resilient flooring surfaces free from sod, excess tom` Ath, h sum bound to steel studs so that lending edge. or end of each I,c•ard is attached Monufactuiers of Vinyl Composition file. adhesive or surface blemishes. Use commercially available metal cross-linked. Thickness', Provide gypsum board in 5/8 Inch thicknesses. CompDy with ASTM C gypsum q J l }f+v 84t] for application system and support spacing indicated ucryli: product acceptable to resilient flooring manufacturer. to open (unsupported) edge of stud flange first Kentile Floors, Inc h ' Gypsum Wallboard' ASTM C 36, and as follows Attach gypsum board to supplementary framing and blocking provided for addihonul e Protect re�.ilient flooring against damage from rolling loads for initial period �l support at openings and cutouts. Manufncturers of Rubber Wall Rase following installation by covering with plywood or hardboard Use dollies to Tapp -irecode, unless otherwise ue rn ncatedequipmentemove stohonary eq ui Pinept or furni shin a across floors. Spot grout hollow meol door frames for hollow metal doors and doors over 31 richt, Roppe Rubber Base - Earle-,.es. Ta,erad. _ Cover avdrenl goofing with undyed, untreated building paps: until inspection for wide A lY s of yr wl ut each 1anb anchor chP Iust before -mertn9bowdnrameh _IENT FLOORING CLORS AND PATTERN, su Gatonhcl gomplchan. Type I" Care Board Cover beth races of sleet stud partition framing with gypsum b•„rd in :oro e JeJ spares 111F FLOORING Clean raiihent flooring not more than 4 days prior to date scheduled for inspections (above ceilings etc.) intended to e=stablish dale of substantial completion in each area of project, Clean resilient TRIM ACCESSORIES” Fit um baord around ducts, pi es, and conduits. Vinyl Composition Tile. FS ),S-1 -312, Type IV'; lT x 12" unless otherwise mitre iter, Iluonng by nwDiod recommended by resilient flooring manufacturer. 9yPs P Cornerbead and Edye Trim fur Interior Installation Comply with ASTM C 840 and the rind us follows pt'4 gyps p '4trip protective floor polish, which was applied Offer completion of installation, prior to rohowing- Where porfdrons intersect concrete beams, cut um board to ht rofde of beam'; and allow 1/4 to i/2 inch wide joint far sealant Composition 1 or 2 at CunirocWr's option cleaning, Cornerbead formed front zinc alloy, with flanges knurled and perforated or of fine- mesh expanded metal 'spare fasteners it) hoards in accordance with relerencmJ gyp-,un) hrnud oppficolion Gaya. I/8" Reapply floor palish after cleaning. and hrushinq standard and manufacturer's te,.ommendotions-. Color. A, selected by BANM Project Engineer. EXTRA c,Tuw IC Steel Edge trim formed from golvomzod steel, types per Fig. 1 of ASTM C 840 as MF.1H008 OF GYPSUM BOARD APPLICATION: fd allow AGCESSUF,IES. Dealer stick of maintenance materials to Owner, Furnish maintenance materials from LC' Read, unless otherwise indicated. Single-Layer Apphcufion. Install gypsum wollboord as Follows some mmwfocfured lot as materials installed and enclosed in protective packaging with . F' u Rubber Well Buss' Provide rubber base, with rcalchinq end stops �rnd prefarmer or oppropnote identifying labels. , On porhhons/wulls apply gypsum board vertically (parallel to frominy), unless molded corner units, and as billows: - ,, �i , otherwise indicated and provide sheet lengths which will mni imize and joints. Tdv Flooring: Furnish not Tess than Dna box for each 50 boxes or fraction thereof, '4 Gl'P91M BOARD JOINT TREATMENT MATERIALS Height: 4" or as indicated General Provide materials complying with ASTM C 475, ASTM C 840, and recommendations Double -Coyer Application Install gypsum wallboard as follows: ;EC110fJ 09'300 - PAOJTING Of mono(rid urea of both gypsum board and joint treatment materials for the. application indicated Thickness /8" gage. a .)i/ On partitions/walls apply base layer and face layers vertically (parallel to homing) DESCFHP LION OF WORK i iyp r I Joint Tape. Paper reinforcing tape, unless otherwise indicated. with ]Dints of base layer over supports and face layer joints offset of least 10 Style Premium top-set cove base ut VCT E dent of xvnhn work is as herein specified. orches with base layer joints I 9 P r e Tay ] Finish: Matte. Use pressure sensitive or staple--ottaclied open-weave gloss fiber reinforcing tope Work includes painting and finishing of interior and exterior exposed items and surfaces with compatible joint compound where recornmended by manufacturer of gypsum Fastening Methods. Apply gypsum boards to supports as follows Fallen with sciewe, Color. As selected by' BANM Project Engineer. ilii oughaul the Bell Atlantic Nynex Mobile project board and joint treatment materials for application indicated . iT - c. J- DRYWALL TRIM ACCESSORIES: INSTALLATION ( r DR Adhesives (Cements) Waterproof, stabilized type as rewmmended by Ilerorin9 Work includes field painting of exposed pipes, conduit and hangers, exposed steel and iron Drying-Type Joint Compounds: Factory-prepackaged vinyl-based products complying use. Gene.ral', Where feasible, use the same fasteners to anchor trim accessory flanges as manufacturer to suit material and substrate conditions-, work antennas, antenna mounting hardware and antenna cable, where exposed for View reruued to fasten sum thourd to the supports. Otherwise, fasten flanges to cliniply and purred metal surfaces of fittings and equipment including those items installed under - - ,Y r. with the following requirements for formulation and intended ., 9YP Toping compound formulated for embedding tape and for first coal over fasteners with manufacturer's recommendations. Concrete Slob rimer: Non-stainu,g type as reu,mmended by flooring mmwfucl ver mechanical and electrical work, except as otherwise indicated. r F �+t. and flanges of corner beads and edge trim. Install corner beads at external corners Leveling and Patching CompoundsLotex Types as mrornmended by flooring "Paint' as used herein means oil coaling systems materials, including primers, emulsions; Tapping compound formulated for till (second) and finish (third) coats. manufactured. enamels stains, sealers and fillers, and athero lied materials whether used as _ Install metal edge trim whenever edge of gypsum board would otherwise be exposed or PP prime 1N:Fk, intennodipte air finish coats. MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS: semi-exposed Provide type with face flange to receive joint 6ampound except where "U" ti i a rj r PARI 3 - EXECUTION Surfaces to be Painted: Except where natural finish of material is specifically noted as o _ i d bead (semi-finishing type is indicated. Cenerai'. Provide auxiliary materials for gypsum drywall construction whip;h comply with is tightly abutted to other construction INSPECTION surface not be be painted, paint all exposed surfaces. Where Items or surfaces are not ' t+ ,`T',' fi referenced standards and the recommendations of the manufacturer Of the gypsum board, Install "LC" bead where drywall construction specifically mentioned, point the same as similar adjacent materials or areas. ' Colors shalt and back flange can he attached to framing or supporting substrate be selected by (B.AN.M) except where indicated to match adjacent. for Install "LK" bead where substrate Is kerfed to receive long flange of Fnrn. Require Installer to inspect subfloor surfaces to determine that they are satisfor. ory. A fir +r ,1i'lei' Spot Grout: ASTM C 475, setting-type faint compound of type recommended hod9w metal door frames. satisfactory subFlaai surface is defined as one that is smooth and tree from cn cks, Males, Following categories of work are not included as part of held- applied finish work. 1 t ". spot grouting a Install 'C bead where edge trim can only be installed after gypsdm board is ridges, coatings preventing adhesive bond, and other defects impairing performer e or }4 se." Gypsum Romd Screws: ASTM C 1002. installed. appearance. cihy 3fu f olI - - ---_ - Sea ; -Date: Scale: Urowiinq No ,x f aye ) f ---- — -- Project location: Drawing Description EMMS S,`(t,RED AljCy�r 8-20-46 AS NOTED i 3 d•V'° jl - — --- ® Bell Atlantic NYN� Mobile R.+sWe«n ChgcMed RY "f _4RS.' 'fRf,SPECIFICATIONS � � �' I F _ 9-20-96 ISSUED FOR FILING 1 MOBILE CELL SITE INSTALLATION 7 " .='i ' - +.v"- stl regi CONSULTAN`T'S INC. � e� � Proleci No �6 723 . .' � � T --- ° ° MAIN ROAD (ORIENT PT. SEARCH AREA) ENGINEERING - TECHNICAL - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 'y � O� ' 9ri'-�t2'73 ' 9--6-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 100% REVIEW 5UITE M• 3555 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY RONKONKOMA N Y. ,11774 �iPj arsonn i "' r " r I+ a 8-2'L-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 60% REVIEW Fz C ~ J = T � C T SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK - _ ¢-iz°¢NulGr eww srreuar,xv,nw•wax aw e°v-wso.are nig ees-etsv ��E DY• mai Pro)ect,No. Sheet of Revs^inn Dale Dewiption _ - -__- (516) 9B 1-3990 FAX (51'6) 9B1 -3971 2 - r, . . 1i iftt N, I till 9 llAY i tv,y+T*N,yy ' v, I,-J:\DWGS\96-723\SC-3 9-6-96 1156110 pin EST Ax'w2( SURFACE PREPARATION: INTERIOR PAINT SCHEDULE: JOB CONDITIONS. Unless otherwise indicated, do not include parotin when General: Provide the following paint systems for the various substrates, as Indicated. TYie Cgntractor shall assuMe responsibility for qll existing Conditions.,, AftmY aWord Of' '•'�*°i' �,,(s Pro-Finished Items: 9 General: Perform preparation and cleaning procedures in accordance with paint . ,,., y r contract, there will be no consideration of claims; - - ,- such items as but not for each articular substrate condition. _ a v>.I• factory-finishiny or installer-finishing is specified for uc ( manufacturer's instructions and as herein specified, r p .t7 ' limited to finished mechanical and electrical equipment, including light fixtures, Gypsum Drywall Systems: PART 2 - ' PRODUCTS - 1 switchgear, distribution cabinets and conduits. Provide barrier coats over incompatible primers or remove and reprints using as Lusterless (Eggshell) Emulsion Finish. .3 Coats. Provide and install all materials required whether or not specified Herein and/or shown' 'qfi Concealed Surfaces: Unless otherwise indicated, parotin is net required on required. Notify Architect in writing of any anticipated problems in using the 9 q specified coating systems with substrates primed by others. the drawings to provide for complete tunctionol assemblies. hr "tve surfaces such as walls or ceilings in concealed areas and generally inaccessible First Coat: Interior Latex Base Primer Coot (FS TT-P650). areas, furred areas, utilitytunnels, pipes aces, and duct shafts. p Remove hardware, hardware accessories, machined surfaces, plates, lighting MANUFACTURERS SHALL INCLUDE: fixtures, and similar items in place and not to be finish-painted, or provide Moore: Moore's Latex Quick-Dry Prime Seal. Finished Metal Surfaces: Unless otherwise indicated, metal surfaces of anodized surface-applied protection prior to surface preparation and painting operations. Andrews Unistrut Baird aluminum, stainless steel, chromium late, copper, bronze and similar finished Second and Third Coats. Interior Latex Base Paint FS fT-P- 29 . Micn?flect Comsat s' gd, g p PP Remove, if necessary, far complete painting of items and adjacent surfaces. ( ) materials will not require finish painting. Following completion of painting of each space or area, reinstall removed dems. v r V, Moore: Moore's Regal Aquavelvet MATERIALS INCLUDE Operating Parts: Unless otherwise indicated, moving parts of operating units, Clean surfaces to be painted before applying paint or surface treatments Removea mechanical and electrical parts, such as valve and damper operators, linkages, oil and grease prior to mechanical cleaning Program cleaning and painting so that Metol: ANTENNA CABLES' rvvi ,,c^x r "4 linkages, sensing devices, motor and fan shafts will not require finish painting. contaminants from cleaning process will not fall onto wet, newly--painted surfaces. Semi-Gloss Enamel Finish: 2 Coats over rimer with total dr film tl Ickness nit STANDARD JACKET Following categories of work are included under other sections of these specihcotions. Determine alkolinuy and moisture content of surfoaas to De painted by performing p y less than 2 5 mils. x 1 7/8" 5p OHM Foam Coaxial cable, Andrew Cal. LDF5-50A or approved r^ iiv„ ;I appropriate tests. If surfaces are found to be sufficiently alkaline to cause Prime Coal Prime coat is not re uired an items delivered she primed equal - Shop Priming Unless otherwise specified, shop priming of ferrous metal Items is blistering and burning of finish paint, correct this condition before applicotion of 9 P I ''C-° )�"'1°r'dr' + included under various sections for structural steel, metal fabrications, hollow aint. Do not paint over surfaces where moisture content exceeds that permitted - metal work and similar items. iin manufacturer's printed directions. Moore: Iran-Clad Retardo Rust Inhibitive Point or gppropiiate primer. 2. i-1/4 50 OHM Foam Dielectric Coaxial cable, Andrew Cat, LDF6-50 Or approved equal First and Second Coat: Alkyd Semi-Gloss Enamel FS IT-P-506), c D' Unless otherwise specified, shop priming of fabricated components such as Ferrous Mentals: Clean ferrous surfaces, which are not galvanized or shop-coated, of oil, y ( 3 I-5/8 50 OHM Foam Dielectric Coaxial cable, Andrew Cat, jf/ LDF7-50A ' " + , ,,ii ,}j„e"`' shop-fabricated or factory-built mechanical and electrical equipment or accessories grease, dirt, loose mill scale and other foreign substances by solvent or mechanical is included under other sections of these specifications, cleaning. Macre: MOoi e's Satin Impervo Enamel. _ ` FIRE-R[fAI:DANI RISER TYPE g ` xU`,"�' *t{r( Mosoni units: , yrs Do not paint over any carie-required labels, such as Underwriters laboratories earl Factory touch-up shop-applied prime coats wherever damaged or bore, where required by other �' 1 7/8", 50 OHM Foam Dielectric Coaxial cable, Andrew Cat. # LDFSRN-SOA or approved equal' - ":z.° Mutual, or any equipment identification, performance ruling, name, or nomenclature sections of these specifications Clean and touch-up with some type shop primer plates Segni-Gloss Alkyd Enamel Finish: } coats with total dry film thicknes nal less ' ! , Galvanized Surfaces: Clean free of oil and surface rantaaninant5 with non-petroleum than 2 5 mils. i 1 -1,4 50 OHM Foam Dielectric Coaxial cable, Andrew Cat. LDFGRN-50 or approved equal t elf, ;a 11 OUAIIT'I ASSURANCE based solvent First Coat Interior Latex Base Entire, Coat 3 1 -5/8", 50 OHM Foam Dielectric Coaxial cable, Andrew Cat # LDF7RN-5OA or approved equal Single Source Responsibility: Provide primers and other undercoat point produced by MATERIALS PREPARATION: (FS-TT-P- 650) Benjamin Moore - Latex Quick Dr some manufacturer as finish coats Use only thinners approved by paint manufacturei , and Prime Seal NUT[ CABI-ES SHALL BE FURNISHED WITHOUT SPLICES AND WITH 4 _ CONNECTORS AT BOTH ENDS. r use only within recommended limits, Mix and prepare painting materials in accordance with manufactures directions, Second & Third Coat. Odorless Interior Semi Gloss „ r,R,;` Alkyd Enamel (FS-TT-E-509) FOAM JIJMPER`.d - Coordination or Work, Review other sections of these specifications in which prime Maintain containers used in iniwng and application of paint in a clean condition, tree of Benjamin Moore - Sohn Impervo En imel ?' WI ,Rdppyj ^: .ECy iip •. paints are to be provided to ensure compatibility of total coatings system for venous forage materials and residue SECTION 10001 - SPECIALTIES Unless otherwise specified, a 1/2" foam dielectric, 50 OHM jumper of less than 3 feet shall substrates, Upon request from other trades, furnish information or characteristics of finish r i lerials provided for use to ensure compatible prime coats are used Stir materials before u! ticafian to roduce a mixtir , of uniform density, and stir ns be ms julep from the end of the antenna cable connector a the antenna's connection 'ick 1 a p P f P P V' DESCRIPTION OF WORK. required during application Da not stir surface film into material Remove tllnl and, if Form ampere shall be made from Andrew cable type LDF and shall be Andrews type v1.1f•' J;" 201 123 cable and shall be factory supplied with connectors at each end to mate with the "' `• ',UBMITIALSnecessary, strain material before using. Work under thin section includes the provision and installation of the wavegl ide (hal antenna connector and antenna cable connector. plates) and <oordinahnn of the wavaquides with the antenna contras lar Product Onto Submit manufacturer's technical information including paint label analysis APPLICATION CONNECT fit , HANGERS AND ACCESSORIES: �i' u ..t and a , licri instructions for each material proposed for use. Sal RIES: Ff The contractor shall provide all required lobar and motenallr whether or nal 9hrrwu on General A tint in accordance with manufacturer's diiectons Ilse npplrc eters and drawings or specified herein, ns regwred to provide a complete functional a 'sembly. CABLE. CONNE CIOR> 'v l PPY P technique's best suited for subst ate and type, of material being applied_ DELIVERY AND STORAGE. Point colors, shall be as selcled by the (BA N M ) Project E:ngine,, Coordinate the work with other contactors 10 ensure a complete and sotisf iclury In_tnllerf_ g Antenna end of cable, nstalle-d t Shelte d of cable t 'h" „i ' for each type, color, pattern and size installed installation r _ Deliver matenals to job site In original, new and unopened packages and container, Provide flat or eqg ehell finishes on walls and reilinys and sernr glu,', on doors, //fl' noble - Andrew L5PDM 7/8" Cable - Andrew L5PDF booting manufacturer', Hume and label, and following information. t frames, trim, etc . RELATED WORK SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE- 1- 1/4 fable - Andrew L6PDM 1-1/4" Cattle - Andrew L6PDF I -7/9 arable - Andrew L7PDM I-S/8" Cable - Andrew L7P0F Name or title Of material Provide finish coats which are compotible with prima paints used, Specialty nems provided and inslalled by the anlenna contraclm Foom jun per,, °' f Fred Sp�g number, if applicctic connectors, unistrut, cable hangers, clamps, grounding lots, et bei Section 10] 11) - CABLE IIANCI_RS Manufact car's stock number and date of rnunufociurer Apply additional coats when undercoats stains or other minions Show thrwgh � Manufochorar's name. final coal of pamt, until paint film rs of unit aim finish, lar and aft i ume Give Antenna Cables and Accessories. Contents by volume, for major pigment and vehicle constituents special attention to insure Haat surfaces, including edges, corers cr.vice.,, welds, SUBMPTfAI.4 install al nwximum 4 feet spacing, made of stainless steel Thinning Instructions. and exposed fasteners receive a dry fill Mackness egwvolent to ih,il ,f flati . ar I >•" � Application instructions. surfaces Submit catalog outs, bloc Yu lin.^,, etc to demonstrate that the materials emmthat but Kindorf, galvanized as detailed crop � ons le, - Catbr name and numberproject are as specified or are equal to the (HA-N.M) stundards Paint surfaces behind movable equipment and fwnrture same ns snndur c:<posed Shire materials riot it, actual use in tightly covered containers Maintain containers used in surfaces Point surfaces behind permanently-fixed equifrnent or hurl- v with CABLE GRIP storage of point in to clean condylion, bee of foreign materials arid residue prime coot only before final installation of equipment JOB CUNDIfICWS iii The Cont ac lei shall assume res nansibilil for all existing conditions Allr Instcill whey, cables hang vertical and cannot he supported by cable hangers. Install of 100 tr'f Protect from freezing where necessary. Keep storage area neat and orderly Paint back sides of access panels, and removable Or hinged covers Icy match f Y 3 r iwinl or f„Ot Intervals Remove arty rags and waste daily Take all precautions to ensure trot workmen exposed surfaces contract 1(iern will be no consideration of r_lairns r _ and work areas are adequately protected from fire hazards and halt, hazards pc ' %/y (,able Andrew 192568 #''r� PARI '2 - PRODUI,TS resulbn front handling , miyinc and application of saints Other interior doers an Mps, bottoms and side edges same as exterior faces, unless 1 - 1/4' Coble - Andrew 2431 I g 3 J PP I otherwise indicated 1 -` /&' r:nble -- Andrew 24312A Provide and install all materials required whether or not spoctlied herein am liar shown on , JCI-1 CONDITIONS Sand lightly between each succeeding enamel or varnish obi, the Ir awing., provide a earnplate functional trislallatiO1 GROIMUING MIT', MANUFACTURERS, ',HALL INCLl1DE - r A water-base points only when ternipeialirr Of suriar_es to be painted and surzourdi°'1 Omit first coat (pruner) on metal surfaces which have been shop primed and '�'�u Install a1 a minimum at the antenna location, before entry into building and at the PPY air h=.napenatures are between 50 degrees F ( 10 degrees f.:) and 90 degrees C (32 d<grYes touch-up painted, unless otherwise indicated. L�Iflom if the vertical drop and at the inside of the radio room, and all other locations as� ' C), unless otherwise permitted by paint manufacturer's printed instructions. Microflect Scheduling Painting. Apply first-coat material To surfocea that have been i'lenned, ;h� r , a the plans. Afield installed double hole lug shall be camped onto the Too Apply solvent-thinned paints only when temperature of surfaces to be pointed and pinhreated or Otherwise prepared for painting o_: soon a-, pruchcable aflei preparation and MAI ERIAlS INCLUDE uniennmated end, surrounding art temperatures are between 45 degrees F 7 degrees C and 95 degrees F j �) 9 ( y ) 9 bchJre subsequent surface detenorution, 7/H 4nbin - Anch ew 241088-7 �}uD (35 degrees C), unless otherwise permitted by point manufacturer's printed instnJchogs, WAVEGUIf?[ ENTRY (HATCHPLATES) 1 - 174' Cah1e - Andrew 241088-8 Allow Sufi anent lime between successive coatngs to permit prapar drying Do not r 1 -5/8' Coble - Andrew 241088-9 Do not a point in snow, turn, log or mist, or when relative humidtly exceeds 857, nr recast until paint has dried to where it feels frrn does riot detwm or feel sticky Provide we guide entries as shown on lho call incl dmwunys and as specu ad herein. PPY P to damp or wet surfaces, unless otherwise permitted by point manufochirar's pooled under moderate thumb pressure, and eLonalion Of another i:unl of parol does Hol PARE 3, LXECUTIUN Wave aide coli ;;hail be aF aluminum tinted machinery gray or ns shown ,11 the contract + '-­ instructions- cause lifting or loss of odheslon of the auric rc e,at. y Y P Y 7 cY ti b drawings ANILNNA CABLES Paintingmay be continued during inclement weather if areas and surfaces Minimum Coating Thickness Apply materials at nal le' than MIJ11 TOClarer's s x y e lunate spec b point v,c used and heated within temperature I Y I- recommended spreading rate, to establish a total dry film thickrosss a:: indicated or, if not Fasten woveguide entries with # 14 sWntles; steel screws, washers and pia Ir an..hurs n' Antenno cable lengths shall be field measured and installer shall notify (B.A.N.M yVvlfi').4 painted are east C prior to [lie purchose of the cable to confirm the overall length and type of cable "f,t.,v. i ntunua,Aorer during application and drying periods indicated, as recommended by coating manufacturer as shown on the contract drawings planned to be used, _ a� n:M PARR 2 - PRDIJUCR3 r Prime Coats' Apply prime coact of material which is required to be painted or finished, and Provide Watertight seal caps at each unused eritry opening. which has not been prune sainted by others Provide wave urde boot assembly at each used opening, Hoot assembly sh ill inclodP Cables shall be labeled with permanent markers brass tags stamped with antenna ACCEPTABLE MANUFACTURERS. 9 y - P- 9 Y Ori« nhatou and number and attached to cables with stainless steel tie wires. Tags shall be herbal primed and sealed surfaces where there is evidence of suction spots n, rmseahed cushion jacket, cushion and stainless ;feel clamps, boot metenril sh�oll be I: uoffecled by provided of Manufacturer Subject to compliance with requirements, provide products of one of fila ureas in first coat, to assure �o finish coat writ no turn-through r,r other delecis due to ozone, sunlight, aging, or extremes of heat and cold. Heol and cushion rr iteral shall following. Subject insufficient sealing conform to the requirements of ASTM-D2000-700, and ASE J200. Antenna locations I, ".r, � ' ,•vp Al 50 foot intervals •j Wall, Trim and Miscellaneous. Pigmented U a ue Finishes: Two coat minimum Completely cover lc, novide an Size of boot assembly shall ;onform to the size it the wove uid:; opening ind diameter cif i I `r' rf J ( p g ) ( ) p � y F Y 9 P� 9 Betwre entry into the radio room ttfr, Ni4'•i , opaque, SolOOth surface of uniform finish, color, oppeurnnre and _o,,rage cloudiness untenno cables. At the termination before the AIF - . Benjamin Moore and Co (Moore) spoiling, holidays, laps, brush marks, runs, says, iopnes., or other surface nnperfechomFruit , ?, will not be acceptable. PART 3, EXECUTION All ruble connections outside shall be covered with a weatherproof splicing kit. The kit r Sher & Ialliams P Sherwin—Williams shall include the following: p p 9 Completed Work Remove, refinish or repaint work riot in cornplionr.e with specified Install waveguides is detailed or, drowm3s i ao,dinnle sizes of boot assert, dy with t'.-<' MAI CRIALS q waveguide openings and antenna tabic diameters in concert won antenna c( ntractor. I Lo er of friction tape over the connector (_ r4 Y P Aa” requirements 2 Layers of Butyl rubber tape completely over the friction tape and 1/2" beyond it Material CYiaLty Provide best yioolriy grade of venous types of rootage as regularly CIFAN—IJP AND PROTECTION' ' SECTION 10110 - ANTENNA CABLES AND ACCESSORIES A Layers of oil weather picstic tape over the rubber tape and extending 1/2Y „;yp;,))k`:xr . mmxifar.lured by acceptable point materials manufacturers Materials not displaying beyond It - manufanturer U - identification as a standard, best-- grade product will not be acceptable eanUp. During progress of work, remove from site discarded trialtenals,finial arubbish, DESCRIPTION OF WORK 1 zi.'T „ Cecil Tr l the entire area with coats of 3M Scotch Kate B :' ,k't' cons and rags at end of each work day Work under this section includes the coardin,hon of antenna cable sizes an I lengths with Calor Pigments' Pure, non-fading, applicable types to suit substrates and service (BA N.M), installation of ail antennas, (provided by B.AN M) inshrllaton of nl The minimum bending radius for antenna cables shall be as shown below' -.!'u•.t„ indicated Upon completion of painting work, clean window glass and other pninl spattered surfoees. antenna cable (provided by B,A,N.M) and the purchase and installation of f Remove spattered paint by proper methods of washing line scraping, using cars riot to all antenna cable accessories including but not limited to Superflex foam umpers, conne•'tc,r,, CABLE SIZF IN AIR OR CABLE TRAY IN CONDUIT i ^'t"y; Lead content it, pigment, if any, is limited to contain not more than the City of scratch or otherwise damage finished surfaces. unistrut cable hungers, cable clamps, grounding kits, etc 7/8 INCH 10 INCH 18 INCH "iti' New York's allowable limit as per lead metol based on the total non-volaf le 1- 1/4 INCH 15 INCH 22 INCH h1 'ret, =film of tint D weight. Protection: Protect work of other trades, whether to be painted or not, against damage by The antenna contractor shall provide all required labor and materials, whetnI r or not 1 -5/8 INCH 20 INCH 28 INCH dry p Y 9 painting and finishing work Correct any damage by cleaning, n=pninnq or replacing, and shown on drawings or specified herein, as required to provide a canplete botional n 1/,2 INCH FOAM JUMPER 5 INCH N/A UkV•ty`$f '�I 't Architect. assembly - e” x Volatile, organic compounds (VOC) All paint products shall comply with repainting, us acceptable to Ar Cables shall be installed with a minimum number of bends where possible. Cables shall prevailing lar-al requirements 9 9 P Y-P' complete - Yf''' ' Provide "Wet Paint' signs as required to protect newt slated Irnrshes Remove Coordinate the work with other contractors b> ensure o and salisl� �Cl or not be left unterminated and shall be sealed immediately atter being installed. PART 3 - FY•ECIITION Temporary protective wrappings provided by others for prefer h•n, of their work, installation. rti �r s after completion Of painting operations Frnin'I jumper.; from the AIF to the antenna cables Shall be provided by (B.A.N,M). RELATED WORK SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE: 10 M1 INSI'ECTIOtLAt completion of work of other trades, touch--up and restore oil damaged or A, ')wfy?i° q. Appliasloi must examine nines and conditions under which proofing work is to be applied defaced painted surfaces. Items of General r`onstructiarl, woveguicle entry (botch plates), etc, . See Sec ion 10001 -and notify Contractor in writing of conditions detrimental to proper and finely completion SPECIALTIES. Secure horizontal antenna cable runs In cable tray or at 4 foot on-center. + t 1 Of work Do not proceed with work until unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected in LXTERIOR PAINT SCHEDULE (Where applicable) KITS. r a ?Ili GROl1NDING KITS SUBMITTALS: ) T",tan„ F a manner acceptable to Applicator Y qemploying, p (-?j ground straps to the antenna cables, ,the connections shgit he r `k`k?rr, 1W 1 Mnsonr Match existing a rime coat and two finish coats After the installation of the Starting of painting work will be construed as Applicators acceptance of surfaces arid Submit catalog cuts, brochures, etc.. to demonstrate that the materials emp' )yed in this sealed and made weather tight per above. ,r ,.;.. Ir,,v1 v ' conditions within any particular area. Metal. Same as Interior, Color to match existing or adjacent project are as specified or are equal to the (B.A.N.M) standards ^ " r'Ti All ground pigtails shall be, brought in the downward direction from the connection ko, the Du not proof over dirt, rust, scble, grease, moisture, scuffed surfaces, or conditions antenna cables, without any sharp bends (10" min, radius) and connection shall'be mode:to otherwise detrimental to formation of a durable paint filmthe ground system. A , 1 it yylJy F --- -- ---— Project location Drawing Description' Seal DOW. Scale: Dtindwit ft. s A ■M, .r,ERED ARC/y� 8-20796 AS NOTED ,,<� , BSI" Atlantic \-.Ob''e .QS rS R.Tbq TF Dawn 91� CrtrockeJ 8y k - ' N'I Is1 9--20-96 ISSUED FOR FILING pp 8 �� �o��r MOBILE CELL SITE INSTALLATION SPECIFiCA710NS I� �s°a ��"�t `Ill sRs ' "rr ' S j'"—�'± h" `"a1' d _ �I6� �e �OhE 1 MAIN ROAD (ORIENT PL SEARCH AREA CONSULTANTS INC. 11' Proi�ct No: "8e-723 9--6-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 1007 REVIEW ` ENGINEERING - TECHNICAL SERVICE - CONSTRUCTION kAMGEMENT •;„y �, 96-1275Un SOUTHOLDNEW YORK f Iv{ o P c = T E= c r , SUITE M•3555 VETERAN” MEMORIAL. HIGHWAY RONKONKOMA N.Y. 11779 8-22-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 607 REVIEW F arsooa nl �d -- '— iz-iz rzaraarr will snxr¢t xr,nna.M cru t.Mu aM ws-Ma Owner Pra)aal No: 9Aed bf r Rrrision Daaiiptinn Dala (516) 981 3990 _--- FAX (516) 9R1•-3971 fr9j Fp§�F� 4 III I i II d 4 "r ,"A ' i 1 v I liyX ylrl�, .lT TELCO, SERVICE ELIC SERVICE ev ENTRANCE ENTRANCE -� r,� T _ - - — UTILITY NOTES: ��-- -" I. TELEPHONE CABLE TO ENTER BUILDING AS SHOWN AND TERMINATE Al' TELCO BOARD. vc > r jl 2 ELECTRICAL SERVICE CONDUIT 10 TERMINATE IN SERVICE _ ' " ¢" 't 'I'✓�'F. " :� CIRCUIT BREAKER. -_LI E_ _ _ _L ,a To,, } ++ x LOl 145 (S 97 .3. PROVIDE 4'-0" X W-O" X 3/4" THICK FIRE RETARDANT PLYWOOD _ IO'50' EV) '� g OOM Rnnlo ro-I or, 'D� I', TELEPHONE BOARD. FINISH WITH (I) PRIMER COAT AND ('2) FINISHED - - -- - _ _ ____ ___ ___ ` COATS OF WHITE PAINT VERIFY LOCATION OF TELCO. BOARD WITH - -- - --- C'rf NYNEX PRIOR To INSTALLATION :Ab nk t a3. s NEW IINOERCROUND ELI OlfRICAL _ III ETMGI-SLE FLEI:IRITAL RISLR ' x id I yA� I UTILITY CONTACTS: �oIA,,RuI I IL -" 1 LILCO- BOB DLIANEY, 548-7043O � -UELCPHONE SERVICE ENTRANCE. SEI: UTILITY E 2 INYNEX-- fro NTRANCE DETAIL I I FENCE- ";a ti (5 3T 10 50'E) 16:5 00 .2 LXISI NG -, ���� 1 POLE INc UTILITY �L- - -_-_ NEW ROADWAY__ ` - - I PROPOSED PRE MFG y IIT L_. II L_,� f f-%AN�C;,L. L1�IE ��Sf L� _�-_-]! EOPT AFTER. NO '-CALE NORTH nh ' . . --MONOPOLE fy rI N TAX LOT_5 / --ELECTRICAL SERVICE PROVIDE LONG RADIOS SWEEP ATI ENTRANCE SEE PULPY "VACC ANTa BASE OF POLE AND SIUP-UP - ENTRANCE DETAIL MIN 12' ABOVE MADE, ',Y ILLT, E) ITT LIPHONI' (NEWCE.UNDERGROUND 4 ITIF,PHONE n SERVICE. PROV1Uf 1" LMPII T'VI; -- -- - - --- - -- 0"AUT WITH (' ONHRAs ' + ! ' Jy W �m'.IALLN. u MIK BELOW Groot I GIOU D R N ING KEY NOTES: r . e = (-I) 1--2/0 BOND 10 MONOPOLE, CONNECT AT APPROVED LOCATION ONLY (TYPICAL FOR TWO, 2 PROVIDE COPPFR GROUND BAR CONNECT USING, 2 HOLE LET(', W1 CRIMP !I vt n i T ,.! I )IIr y �TENrE CONNECTOR f0 EXTERIOR CF HATCHPLAIE WITH #2/0 AWG AND EXTERIOR RING BUS WITH #2/0 AWG. _ '� _ _ _ ___ - - _- _ . ______ .__._ - .___- _ ' i- A "'I I I - - --- - � x Q) #2/1) AWG SERVICE GROUND FROM LINDERCROUND GROUNDING SY`gEM T(1 (N.77 40' 20' W) W P (o �- MAIN SERVICE SWITCH IN BUILDING, ' E'U A/C AL -rENGE �— - ._ (q) BOND A/C UNIT To EXTERIOR RING )(2/0 AW ; CABLE W/ DOUBLE LUG --- COMPRESSION LUG AT uwr. (vERlrr Hvnc LOCATION). �) PROVIDE PRUTEI, WITH Pvc '-uEVE r,Er DF FAIL) T. EXTERIOR I k:re; PRE-FAH - GROUND � � SEF OMNI-DIRECTIONAL SECONDARY D11ND DETAIL � , _ BAR .. ,)�,4 EOPT `��, EXTERIOR DURIED RING BUS, #2/O HARE 7 STRANDED COPPER WIRE LS BURIED 30" BELOW IOP OF EARTH ) 5 L� 1�8 Ix, a� HORIZONTAL #2/0 BARE 7 SIRANDLD LHIINTERPOISE GROUND WIRE AT - MIN BELOW IOP OF EARTH. a � 12" MINIMUM NAM O', - - -_.- - (rvPlcm FOR ALL BENusl (g,) PROVIDE r,R)I'PFR BUS LIAR BOND TO INT H.'IOk HATCHPUTE WITH #2 AWG v, k mal AND OMNI WITH #2/0 AWG WINE _ : f _INTERIOR ---- ,_ ° - I7 06� fa51 �GROUND BAR 10 IWC BUS` BARS BY 11LE MEG. F- `�;,�` UTILITY SITE PLA + I HnlcnPlATE _� TI 01 ,(2/0 AWT', GROUND WIRE FROM MONOPOI I GROUND RING/ROD TO YARDARM AND - 7 _ st[ GRuuNDING KD' NOIEL BACK DOWN TO GROUND ROD AT EXICRIOR (If HATCHPIATE. WHERE CABLE NORTH �l) - (J `J (' (T'tNIr,AL] IS I XP0"ED ABOVI GRACE, RUN WINE IN PVL' CONDUIT ATTACHED TO YARDARM $TCP CADIE t CARL SUPPORT LEG iN AY (0 #2 AIGROUND WIRE FROM TOWER AN(,IL ADAPTOR BONDED TO YARDARM I EXT SERVCE i At BOTH ENDS AND RONDED TO EXTERIOR GROUND BAR. I ('-}_, � RISER :OI S' " vA n r —TENGE GROUNDING GENERAL NOTES: F - - - - _ - - 1 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIEYi LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR vl,,tl' tl a TO DRIVING GROUND RODS (SEE 'SITE PI AN) 2, ALL BURIED WIRE TO BE #2/0 BARE 7 S1RINDED COPPER WIRE BURIED - IENCF Pusr 30" BELOW EARTH SIIRFAC,E. yr 4�T F-APICAL) GROUNDING SYMBOLS: ---.— 3/4" X 20' COPPFRWELD GROUND RODP -. TOP OF ROD 30" BELOW, TOP OF EARTH OL RBI) L[ LUGSNTERIORBONDSRE CRIMP WITH S TO BE UGTf� MN D NG PLAN �ulF 3� w SCALE:: I/e" = 1'-D" NORTH + 'h IProjecl location. Drawing Description: SAd1�qF WEW r pate: '$Cole: ' 'OraMlnq NpTTt --_ —_ �� ENIMQA. gO<y_ 08-22-98 h5'NDTEp9-20-96 ISSUED FOR FWNG Bell Atlantic NYNE: Mobile �gg ppppgg �. p 9 * 'DraN'n B�" Checked tj���� ��66�V�1 �� ® UTILrry SITE PLAN, GROUNDING n 0 waupro9-6-96 ISSUED FOR aANA 100% REVIEW AM ° ° ° MOBILE CELL SITE INSTALLATION PLAN AND DETAILS y bar Na _y k ENGINEERING - TECHNICAL SERVICES - CONSQTI N �: ,N 0 ag-1875 + "L:,' ' {17. 24850 MAIN RD. 9 MANAGEMENT m n OTA rsw%TMETML HIGHWAY RONKONXOIM NY. 11779 �" 3 ��r sr , 8-22-96 Issu�D FOR BANM hoz REVIEW ORIENT PT, NEW YORK SUI fE M.3555 VERANS MEMOR Revision Dale pe5cripl--Inn fit mTmu AET.XV.am.wit rsw WPI1 I. ses-etsv Dimer Protect No 9-N TE111KIL (51fi) 98T-3990 FAX (916) 98Y-3971 IOfp $, QN XX%XI ', 0 41ggy t v ,4 4_ 9,$ t. '3 iA tl I 4 9 ' flog( GENERAL GROUNDINGa� NOT�44i0 ANY METALLIC OBJECT PASSING 0 ! 0 I. CONTRACTOR SHALL VEI'IFY 111E EXACT LOCATION AND ARRANGEMENT / 0 OF EQUIPMENT, PANEL, PARTS, ETC, THAT MUST BE GROUNDED, AND WITHIN A FOOT OF THE 'HALO O 0 0 %j J INSTALL GROUND BOND! TO THE INTERIOR CABLE BUS, GROUND RING SHALL BE GROUNDED 't 4 ` ��'' Lit, 0 /) 2. ALL GROUNDING WIRES -ROM THE BURIED GROUND LOOP i0 THE INTERIOR TO THE HALO RING WITH GREEN + ,' d 0 / / OR TO ANY OTHER EXTI RIOR POINT SHALL 13E INSTALLED IN PVC CONDUIT WIRE. 0 R { 0 0 0 ,.,� / (USE LONG RADIUS) FR IM 18 INCHES BELOW GRADE TO THE CONNECTION 4 .LS ji4w' \�� �\ �� POINT. T ')' p� 0 C 0 3 ALL EXTERIOR GROUNDLFG WIRE SHALL BE x}2/0 AWG STRANDED COPPER WIRE. 4. THE INTERIOR GROUND ;ABLE BUS SHALL BE #2 AWG GREEN INSULATED ' } ' 0 -v STRANDED COPPER WIR( LEGEND 5 UNIT BOND WIRE TO THP INTERIOR CABLE BUS SHALT_ BE #6 AWG GREEN -_ �\ INSULATED STRANDED C 1PPER WIRE, LINLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. COPPER GROUND HAS 1/4' X 4' % 20", NEWTON nk yA (� INSTRUMENT Co cat #H-6142 � v� 6, CONTRACTOR SHALL ME'SURE THE RESISTANCE OF THE GROUND GRID v up INSULATOR,, NEWTON INSTRUMENT Co. ` AFTER ALL EXTERIOR CI NNECUONS ARE COMPLETED AND INFORM THE FIELD WIRING `(` yp AT .,I (J CAT. #.3061-4 \��. (�,�� ENGINEER, IN WRITING, OF IHB THE GROUND RESISTANCE VALUE b, S-0 , \� j UNDERGROUND —� 9/8E LUC,NWASIIERS, NEWTON INSTRUMENT CO \\ V �� SERVICE I r a )I / ' ��� Z GROUND RODS SHALL E - 3�4" DIAMETER AND 20 FEET LONG COPPER CAT U CAT #3015-8 ��� GROUND RODS SHALL L = INSTAILED SO THAT IF REQUIRED ADDITIONAL RODS CAN I ' G, waL. MouN INc e3at.K NEWTON 114 BE COUPLED TO THE It iTALLEO ROD AND IRF GROUND WIRES CUA ALLOWING THE I r (4) WALL.NSTOONTNT uO. RA OA-60F6 NEW ROD 10 BE DRIVEN run THEN INTO THE GROUND s/6-n x I" H c Hogs, NEW]ON N 200 AMP SERVICE BOND- ) MAIN BREAKER >:;, '' x ` I INsrauMENr en (Al gaol"-I 8. TRANSITION FROM SOUL' TO _1RANDED WIRE MUSH HE MADE WITH DOUBLE 41 w � �' p p ,� pip p (TANDEM) CRIMP COMM :TOK; REI, NMCC PRACTICE 803--500-21U II68 T- - G _ 4", v GIS ((�APiL �� 10) �)T �cL� ����=�FJ)V14 �LII�) _FIELD WIRING 1 FOR TWO DOLE DIGS WITH SPACING OTHER rRNA lF1E PRE-DRILLED _ U MINIMUM SIZE GROUND HIRE TD BE NO 8 AWG GROUNDING ELECTk00E —� SURGE THE COMRACIOR SHALL DRILL D1E BAR IN THE FIHP POLL SIZE NO SCALE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE ARRESTOR 'Elr BOLTS SHALL HE USED TO ATTACH LUG!, 10 HIT GROUND BAR 10 ALL GROUND WIRE'; ,H U HE GREEN UNLET" 1,APF WITH ARTICLE 250-H g ,T t;J,, 11 "FEEL CONDUIT TO BE :HUUNUT D USING CONDIII(, HUSHING AT EACH END 3�4" CONDUIT Td 2" CONDUIT — 't aae' Ail1 L ALL CftOUNLI WIKE TO C COPPCR 3 /3�0's, 1 14 s "'.� f G" (TYPE THHN) (TYPE THHN) NO SCALE 13 All GROUND CONNECDI NS TO GROUND HAI, OR OTHER FLAT MEEAL 5IJR4ACL TO HE MADE WITH DOUBLE HOLE I IYDRAULICAU Y INDENTED LUGS WHEN CADWELD IS ) • ' NOT REQUIRED 200 AMP AUTO 11,t: IR 14. ALL PAINELD SURFAUL `,HALL HE SCRAT'Lf Irl RANI METAL BLFORT. GROUND IS TRANSFER ; j ATTACHED IF SURFACE ) 'SUBJECI TO FIT 1Wt, r,CoICHICOTE DY UM SHALL BE 40KW APPLIED OVER CONNE( �OIJ KOHLER UNE OF CEILING GENERATOR 2" CONDUIT r e A 15 IF ALUMINUM SURFACE'. ARE TU BE UROLIND10, MIER I-L FANING SIIRFA[ APPLY 3 #310s, 1 14 OXIDAIION INHIBHOP BI -CRL BIONUIN4 Ill 'SURFACC (TYPE THHN �\ _ ) ) N, — 12 nwc GRI EN INSULATED 2" CONDUIT I --- - 16 NO SHARP BENDS `,HAI HE MADE IN AMI hRgJNI) WIRE MAINEAIPJ A MINIMUM 3 1310's, 114 A� s"(rm)� �`—_z i�'� 8" BEND RADIUS. (TYPE THHN) vIr u� l �✓ �' — — #2 awr, GREEN wwLArm - >;' 17 ALL HVAC GRILLE�1 RN ISTFR;, PIPING, &111DIN1, -,TILT, AND DUCTWORK SHALL 200 AMP -� MAIN BREAKER ! d� 'M RANUCU COPPER WIRE --s'IITYP) >, ;InnooFr (PERIPHERAL BUS) BF GROl1NDED. Ab GH( NN o PANELBOARD L; IX \� �OINL=C� UNE D�Qc� G3QM � CRIMP STW+NDED 10 HNc NYNFx uran NO SCALL v PERIPHERNL BUS POLI' #Ihh (IYFICAI) SIANDOFF I yyA y \ I ?E-MIG PROVIDE CABLE SIACK f DF PER DLCO S1ANTIAFUS — 12 AWG BARE r' COPPER WIRE RADIUS BEND F - 0' NOMINAL) - 1 RADIUS BEND 0' - d'(MINIMIIM) -ASC UNIT + v F I o- r,LNLRATIOR C,]i -LOCI BANM EUPT al RIMP STRANDED 10 ,IRANDEOI i 15'- 1 SCHEDULE 8U PVC I i O" ABOVE r + GRADk r_XIERIOR 200A I PHA E — � , c� r 3-WIRE METER PAN - 16'OUSH � -- -- — F'(TI_RIOR IOOA, 1 PHASE DOUHti CRIMP -�� i SrRANDFO TO soup , WIRE LEER PAN. --� (NO MET R FUTURE) y; f PP.OPERTY MIN 'll'- } STANDOFF — � �1r0 AWG STRANDED IINF IT 7 MIN �Id, TO EXTERIOR RING BITS CRADF 6 WIT � FOUNDAIIUN •+ 131 -- IMUlLEf,DON Of WAILS ORAN I" PVC �LLTVF ?siAAA , V�, SERVICE hNTPANCL sFFsue-uPULrNL -� f �S\��SNAQ��,� INTOBLDG. TiU r PHl1F'F.RTY Itcmn rG Ir, UNE BU% - .Q kil yTY r tf"A OrMINII Dfi <C� 1`11 JNIAl� CUFF_(cTIRI (<`IAL� G�UL�, [ _`G3 [�>HA(C-,QRAL1 ��) ��(�,(c��U�D,� � �13�r�fN@ DETAL NA GALE -- -- --- � NO SCALE kr. r P Ly,l t - Seal tlate: Saale DrWlny No Project kation: Drawing Description: ' ( �F W Y6 08-�-95 AS NOTED;,t'EMMS d I Otic NYNE. Mobile '* A ° � ® Bell At 8 ELECTRICAL DETAILS AND _ = } Pr*ct No: . s -20-96 ISSUED FOR FILING CONSULTANTS INC. .A�-7R3rr, a' ,r,h;vn' D ��yu�pg pryp� m 276' pig .+1, — — � W9�1�' �e lE9ll��9t9� MOBILE CELL SITE INSTALLATION •noN c Mar — RISER DIAGRAM ENGINEERING - TECHNICAL SERVICES - CONSTRUCTION MANA E � 9-6--96 ISSUED FOR BANM roos� REVIEW MAIN RD. s 24850 SUITE. M,+ 3555 VEIERAN6 ME.MORIAI. HIGHWAY RONK(1NKOMA N.Y. 11729 !gyp 0 er _ 8-22-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 60% REVIEW F� C �_ = T C T _ ORIENT PT, NEW YORK wn - ¢-It Tammur wove KIWT,wr.um•oma nTo N 40•MIA 00 sw>•er» (516) 981-3990 FAX (516) 981-3971 P .XXX% Revislw Dote DescriplloR IALt �,otpBLA + _ Y4p IYYF { b S, � Art r n JfH m EXTERIOR BLDG WALL MEGGER T F- - PREFAB EQUIPMENT BLDG. INS RUMLNT '- }4I INTERIOR GROUND CABLE BUS ' u Ar i ,\ 1 2=0" MIN Q)_ + F i COPPER WIRE) 8'-6' AFF SUPPORTED EVERY 4', MIN. BEING, RADIUS 8r INSULATED INTERIOR CABLE BUS. (p2 AWG GREEN INSULATED STRANDED �)1 I ---- _ _ I Q1 AIH CONOIBONING UNIT CI PI P2 C2 DOUBLE HOLE LUG J2/0 AWG - 1—_ I V-0" PREFERRED. (SUPPUED AND INSTALLED BY BUILDING MANUFACTURER.) �- STRANDED COPPER BARE GROUND CABLE SUPPORTS - SEE DETAILS (INSTALLED BY BUILDING MANUFACTURER,) ,?; �„ WIRE i0 A/C FRAME. / �_ I r a rlY Q3 STUB-UP FROM EXTERIOR GROUND GRID TO INTERIOR CABLE BUS AT EACH BOND WAVFGUIOE HATCH I__. 1 CORNER (BY ELEC. CONTRACTOR) C' 1 TO GRof U BAR. (EYP FOR ;.) I ® TYPICAL 16 AND GREEN INSULATED STRANDED COPPER BOND WIRE TO ALL i G g. '7 ---- - OCE 11ElAIL IBIS SHEET EQUIPMENT PANELS, METAL PARTS, STEEL DOOR FRAMES, ETC. - k;}� Y: _ (BY BUILDING MANUFACTURER.) s ,; --- 3/4" DIA. PJC SECURE TO WALL 0 WAVEGUIDE HATCH PRIMARY BONDS TO EXTERIOR GRID. BOND FROM J AS PER CODE EXTERIOR SURFACE OF HATCHPLATE TO EXTERIOR GROUND RING. - ' •la:% L'"a,¢` r (BY CLEC, CONTRACTOR) i (CI) (P2) - (C2) -FINISHED GRADE �- - --- ---- -- - _ . . s"'``S''' ' I` I ` )a�. ,'� ] L DOOR ITr FOURXIR --_---.� , •, �,_ GROUND LOOP - EXTERIOR II OOP, TEST ELECTRODE TEST ELECTRODE FEST ELECTRODE SEE F,ROUNDN" PIANgyp , Y r.. .� LOCATION AS DIRECTED LOCATION AS DIRECTED LOCA110N AS DIRECTED BY THF ENGINEER HY THE ENGINEER BY THE INCINELR GROUND ROO NOTE: FROM CONCENTRATION POINI ON GROUNDS INSPECTION WELL GO ()OR UP 111 1000' (WHERE IIASI0LL) WAIT Cl TAKE READINGS Al TO' INTERVALS WITH P2 BETWEEN C2 MID CONNECDON POIM. • 4 Y A��'. II �I1�C6�IC»�I, (GFIc�)���6 �JLr�� I���A\ � [� I�, �J� , UOU°AIIQN ©CSIQIL NO SCALE A/C FA0_�L C�)G� U'� �f�rE(��hi ����1 �fiL; _,Il' h .J1G' G�C0)G�3 rr� �,L �� — - — Y - --- ---. _rINK`, u / Ir'I. /"� PROVIDE WAVEGUIDE DEBT AT EACH PORE 1"k OOL�^J)II TC-) lJ ���' �(1,�= �l1/ �" (�'/I J1V`YJ LUL�� u� �f lT �. WHEREA CABLE IS PLACED THROUGH AND A WEATHER TIGHT CAP AT EACH UNUSED t ,i _ —_ OPENING. : 1 NO SCALEI, e(,ti, rq SIGNAL CAOI1 IIID- O O O O SIGNAL CABLE FEED- (,ROUND_ ROU I_ NNEC EI )N a + . SIFEL ENCLOSURE - THROUSH Of SUfFIJIUT S1 CCL ENCLOSURE THROUGH OF SO ENT r (BACK OF FIATCTIPIATE) - _ SPE TO ) AN _NNAC[ (FRONT OF HATCHPIATEJ 512E FI ACCOMMODATE a WHEN THE CONSTRIII PRINT HOW SEVERAL CAHU W A `PECFIIT PNILNIJA CABLES, SPEFIN H ANTENNA O+`�.E$1 GROUND ROO. SEVERAL METHODS CAN FII UTIL],EO 10 ACHIEVE (FURNfdIEU NJU IMSIALLCD 1/ ��'\1/ (FURNISHED MID INSTAIlEp THE REQUIRED ELECTRICAL PARI _. - dl CONIRAI 10R) ✓ �J �� BY CONTRACTOR 1 _ ) �A(F --FINAL CRAOE - h) C i) C_-) ,/ LI 0 0 �� 00 � IT �']@dj - - — — _ - - -_ - - --- — -- 0 (D 0 C) _ FF- -- f o�. ._ f r T F1 L) J � I , 0 0 0 yy WL TIME ✓ CyJ DIRECTEDNU1'S BANM Y \�f HATCHWIRL 1'1411 tIf FFA IHWND DING JI EDN AS Y � HAI H�LF�I �D D BANM ANTENNA ADIL FUND' ANTENNA CABLE B 'hs o a a a a a DADS -- PROTECT THREADED AREA i 2 - FROM DAMAGE OARING AND `� �� O O n'Y AFTER INSTALLATION -- STOWN ON � - - - - - � � "� - ---- � EXTERIOR6a-UN0CIOt6TRIHMON i INHRIOR CROUNLI ' Z_`7Y PRINT OAR PIAT (Pf S)HIRACIDR) If2/0 AWG BARE STRANDED - BAR PLATE(B/ CONtMCTOR) } #2/0 AWG WE STRANDED -- 1 \` CW TO EXTERIOR GROUND RING. a --CAPWFL[I GROUND GW TO GROUND OMNI ., __ PROVIDE r' PVC CONDUIT � BELOW GROUND BAR LEVEL #2/0 AWG °1RANDED-- 1 SLEEVE i0 IM' BELOW GRADE I � -GROUND ROD RARE FBI WIRE s n_� GROUND ROD ccs R(0 U NCQ) ;CJ)D) ' ,` 1 --- -- - -- =— -- -- — — � , � r�)DJ�1D L� C)L�) C,c� »[I�11�ih,c� I�l «Jfi,�l` 1�fn1C» ` I 'L Ic L » I � � If'L G3UC�)h' \U%(I IDDM 1�� US/�al�»II «�a I I� J�)61 � VIEW AT RADDIOo BDG . - =- - ---- - — ---- - - ------ - -- - -- L� �����1 ©(� -- -- --_ NO ;TALI NO SCALE NO SCALE SOLID OR IN AT ULATEDEU NO2 WI 2%0 PANE OR GREEN INSULATED COPPER 2 OR t ' ( i wN To 1A" _NOTE : L — + ANY METALLIC OBJECT PASSIN WITHIN A FOOT OF THE HALO r DOUBLE CRIMP CONNECTORS --- - w R 5: TWO REQUIRED GROUND RING SHALL BE GRO( NDED A y. SOLID cOPPf.RWIRE ------ -- — TO THE HALO RING WITH GREEN WIRE. w OF STRANDED/S)OU ED) WE AI NO SCALE I 4' orf " w A Seal Date: e: DLavip �Ie w ''r? c k' Project localion'� Oravmg Desenplion ,`SOF NEW ,,O D8-.L7-96 AS NOTED ' F \'�^7rt' - -- y1P AKA R. 90 A,f, - _— B Q Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile * D CNepAIRSed 9-20-96 ISSUED FOR FILING COLLINS /� E�INAo�o�o NEW RADIO ROOM AND *S a ° ° w ea AIRS Lr ° ' • rI ������� F. 1N�� V CONSULTANTS INC. _ Project NO: " 96=.723 ww+ MOBILE CELL SITE INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT LAYOUT ENGINEERING'- TECHNICAL SERVICES - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT y 2 96-1275 " - 9-6-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 1007. REVIEW 24850 MAIN RD. SUITE. M•3555 VETERANS MEMORIAL.HIGHWAY RONKONKOMA N.Y. 11779 DI NCO 5 �' r r Y 8-22-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 60% REVIEW II C F---I _ -T E C T S - ORIENT PT, NEW YORK p� Proj�tNo , ¢-2 lc o y nglvk meat[KY.my•Nva(I serw�•MUS 1%)W-009 (51 G) 981-3990 FAX (516) 98 t-3'971 p00 F $ION XX Rensipn Dole Desenplion u. C. , JM ,. yin¢+,rn19 r+ 0 " M1 � LID SHOP DRAWINGS AND APPROVALS B. Installation � t a T (�9"t`J 1.15 ELECTRIC SERVICE AND :HARACTERIS'TICS K. Contractor shall submit vendor cuts and shop drawings, t DIVISION 16 - ELECTRICAL O > v of all equipment and alarms for approval prior to A fhe Contractor shall submit six 6 sets prior all vendor The contractor shall install the grounding.system''as ,,f, r,4 _ installation of same. drawings to the Engineer for o rovdl nor fo A. The Contractor sl all provide n new underground service indicated on the drawin s and supply all 'equipment as `Fri SECTION 16400 - POWER AND DISTRIBUTION WORK 9 9 PP P purchase and/or installation. from the LILCO Overhead Distribution System. necessary for a completed installation. . L The Cuntractm, together with his sub-contractors, Contractor shall snake application to LII_CO for shall hereinafter be referred to as "the Contractor' 8. Submittals shall include complete shop drawings, list electrical service as herein specified, and shall C. Testing 1.1 GENERAL coordinate,nate wilt ulilit company i' of materials and detailed data of equipment giving the cod f Y P Y r a,y, A, The work under this section shall 6a subject to all M Work under this Section shall include, but not be manufacturer's name, catalog numbers, size capacity, The contractor shall make all measurements required to e r t; ''e' �;! applicable provisions of the General Conditions, the limited to, the (allowing: dimensiahs and construction, etc., covering each item 8 Provide condurf s.reeps, users, and cable slack in test the grounding network and submit to the ghgiheer ri which he proposes to install. No equipment or accordance with .ILCO rules and regulations. copies of test data. Earth resistance and 'continuity Supplementary and Special fondilions, and Division 1 materials shall be installed without obtaining testing shall be conducted under the observation of „^, sr .z•; General Requirements. 1. Underground electrical service. C. The depth of bur rl of the secondary service shall be , 2 EGrounding,quipment cables, rods, etc. approved shop drawings. P ry the engineer. Test shall be conducted on ground net 1.2 CONTRACT DRAWINGS 3 Equipment Identification. not less than .3( below finished above Provide r' grodeindependent of external grounds, i.e., power poles, 4 Disconnect switches C. Shop drawin s shall be submitted for the followinc: yellow warning brie one. (1) toot above all underground t • ifi p g J etc. All equipment and meters shall be supplied by 5. Cable and wain including terminations electrical lines. the contractor. Test equipment shell be approved for '. ''+d A. The accompanying drawings aro intended to show the g ) 1. Wiring Devices the purpose b the engineer. general arrangement and extent of work to be 6 Conduits. 9 P P Y g v performed. The locutions for equipment and material 7 Supports. 2. Grounding Clumps, Rods, Cable DThe entire servi . P entrance equipment shall be as shown on the drawings ore approximate. It shall be B Nameplates.s. 3, Disconnect Switches furnished and it ;tilled by the Contructor in strict Megger, vibroground, or equivalent for earth-resistance testing shall beuserumens procedures for . , d• The instruments g. Coordination of work with other contractors. accordance with lotest LILCO Construction Standards. -J. "+•„7:7` , understood that they are subject to such modification the fall-of-potential method or three-terminal test x , as may be found necessary to meet job conditions. 10. Demolition. Such changes shaft be mode by this Contractor al no Cutting and care drilling, 1,11 INSURANCE E This Contractor , full make all connections at the shall be followed. Any point on the ground rod field shall be utilized as the earth a f 12 Testing and inspections. metering cahfne location and provide gruufaing as r a p'at 'li additional charge. 3 P electrode under test. The lest setup and the 13 Guaronlees. A Contractor shall furnish insurance in amounts and required. ,r 14 F'errnels, lees and approvals types, and for periods of time as called for in the distances between referenced test rods shall be as '<',k,�tr' .,r44Nb' Pp shown on the details. The total area, which includes 1 3 SPECIFICATION SECTION 15. Insurance Contract Documents, General Conditions, and as may be F. All material, last, ilahons and e,ectn,.al connections bosh the ground rod field andel test and the test 16 Removal of detnis. requiter) by law associated with accruing service shall he approved by A, Section 16400 - Power and Distribution Work, the utility repre' •relative rads, shall not contain conductive or metallic objects 17 Cleaning such as conduits, cable runs, or structural P 18 Excavation and be,kblL 1 12 COOPERATION AND COORDINATION OF WORK 1 4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK 19. Under round tale hone serwce G. Contmclor shall ,rov,rle seflici utility metering equpmeot reinforcements and must be homogeneous with no 9 P discontinuities such as deep earth fill, rock ridges, A Work shall be performed in harmony with other work on for electrical se',vice to Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile radio etc. The acceptable resistance measured for each T'r"sT"a"d' A This work shall include rill labor, materials, project and so scheduled as to allow speedy arid but (,ontrarfof shall be responsible for filling oil ;;" ^.,..;fit€' equipment arid services necessury for the complete efficient completion of project b alt trades ground rod held shall not exceed , o ohms, LS WORK UNDER OTHER SECTION i P P 1 -� Y applications unit obtaining all permits unit approvals inslollation, demolition and renovation of all Additional ground rods, longer rods, or chemical ; electricat and related work, complete arid ready for train local uhlih cornp'J0y treatment may meet used alone or a combination as �, �, r(,rly+. aeration and in strict accordance with Bell Atlantic A The (dee ing is o general acts. of related work El Render full cooperation to other erodes and furnish in ,� p included under other Contracts. rooting, with copies to the Engineer, an mformahon necessary to meet the requirement. { v p g y H. All metering noel service egwpment shall be in -�� �` {);_h�,�{f NYNEX Mobile, where applicable, the New York City necessary to permit work of all trades to be installed occordanre with the ,equrements and regulations of The contractor shall be responsible for testing the c, ll, Electric Code, Local Agency Ordinances, and the 1. General Construction satisfactorily and with the least possible the local utility otopony grounding system for continuity to ground. All Contract Drawings, or as reasonably specified hereto interference or delay Oma 31" or Implied. equipment and meters shall be supplied and all tests ,� '1 c P 1 f Rtll_E°, AND REGULATIONS Building voltage s ,all be I:U/240V, I phase, 3 woe made by the contractor in the presence of the .,wP C Where work of Contractor will be installed in close . "^y ' •v,..,, B. All work Stroll be performed by qualified licensed A NI electrical work and materials shall comply with piazimity to wort of other trades or where (here is J. Contractor shall ay and secure all necessury fees, engineer Test equipment shall be approved for the electricians. Stale and local codes This shall include, but not be evidence that work of Contractor will interfere with purpose by the engineer Contractor shall submit to -• h.'`.H'dl limited to the following publications an9 out d nodes, work at other trades, he shall assist in working permits and LILT I7 rhan)es lar the installation of the the engineer copies of the lest data. d` new serve,,-e ' t - conditions to make satisfactory adjustment. It C It shall be ossurned that the Conbarlor has examined 1 Notional Electrical Manufacturer's Asscefahon Contractor installs work before coordinatingwith lasts To Be Per(orrned: the site of the proposed constnutian and by making K. As port of this , rob t, the Heil corrector _ 2 Amencon National Standards Institute other trades, he shall make changes necessary to ,hall provide all labor, pnersonnal, plant, wiring, r this proposal effect, give evidence of 3- Underwriters Loboratories correct condition without extra charge 1 Continuity from halo ground exterior grounding he shall, in e equipment, and oaf el sal' required to provide temporary this examination 4, New York City Electrical Code power fur the e Mire area of work All work shall lie ring, 5. NEPA 70', National Electric Code in accordance w if applicable codes and agenars 2. Ground field resistivity fest. D Contractor shall report to the Engineer any 6 NEPA 101, Life SafetyCode D. All work shall be coordinated to prevent interference p having IunsdicGc I. if, extras shall be entertained conditions which may interfere with or otherwise 7, ADA Requirements rlr delay in installation of work of various bode; or for failure to in, lune any of the above Three sets of test data to be recorded and submitted - ;Lir affect or prevent the proper execution and coin leti3n other contractors, Failure to comply with this Provide all required tem ,orae utdihes unit a for p P P' P y F Y pay to the engineer. ,,, ' of work in this sermon. Any cast; ansuly out of his pl. All work shall be perforated m d compliance with the requirement shall obligate Contractor to make changes all associated h my os =s unit operating , r failure to examine the site shall be. borne by the p- P s ` Standards and procedures ns set forth by 13e11 Atlantic necessary to correct faulty condition and to make good Contractor. NYNEX Mobile damages caused to other work by reason of such 1 16 BALANCING AND GROUNI INC " SV'T changes, at his own expense, D, Specific grounding requirements for the new proposed Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Radio Room rovfequipment area P ' E [he words "provide" or "P J h drnr" as used erein 17 PERMITS, INSPECTIONS AND FEES A All blanch circuit ;hall be balanced al thea ' i shall designate that the equipment, labor, material 1,13 CIJI PING AND F'AICHING shall be provided as shown on drawings. respective power panel to within 10 perr.enl full IoaJ and services shall be furnished, installed and/or A Contractor shall file all plans and pay for all supplied by the Cantracior. aPp6ed appticabons, permits, inspections and approvals as A. lhis Contractor shall do all cutting and chasing and E Grounding installation shall Stn accordance with ' f tough otchin for Installation of his work. Bell following NYNEX Mobile Standards and shall meet ` ° F It is understood and agreed by the Contractor that the regwi ed, 9 P 7 B All installed eta It-, a shall n gi oundel as per - e e NEC regwrements and as uidindu) m the drawmys the following goneral criteria; work us indicated and described on the Drawings and/,Ir - ho vholl secure an,1 B. Finish patching and repairs -hall he performed by this nr s e,;elied her, In, and shall include, but nal be o B At the completion of the work,, P 1. All grounding connections shall be mode to complete and shall include all contractor g g ' -' 'r I e cam I hmitad to the f ,Ilnwinr specifications shat b "f' e s of Approval" ) eq P deliver to the us local City. Village, ) I P brighter surfaces. Ap ly corrosion protection ,+ • + equipment necessary for the proper involved is riot of Ure from the venous local Uly, Village, lows, County, systems, even though ovary item involved is not State Tlureaus, Fire Morshal, Fire Underwriters, lor,al C All cutting noel drilling shall he machine cut with 1 Elerh u;al : vvre, its equfpmant, awl to surfaces equal to `�Scotchkote y specifically shown or mentioned, The Contractor shall Building Department and all Deportmenls having power driven tools, Conduit penetrations shall be enclosure be held to pinvide all labor and materials necessary jurisdiction core drilled 2. All grounding conductor tags shall be fiber or �n s for the entire completion of the work intended to be metal construction p 2 Conduits nfit other Vmdurlof rmhsuf.'s. ' indicated or described and shall no( avail himself of L8 t;fANDARDS OF MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP 114 EXCAVATION AND BACI(FILL ' 3. Provide conduit and sleeves for ground wire r e ^?:T '• any manifestly unmtenhonal errors at- omissions, 3. Neutral or Identified c.onduch r tri rota°r protection where shown on drawings and/or should such exist A No electncal device or matenol of an kind shall be A This contractor shrill perform all necessary excavation wiring Sys fain Y specifications. ' used that fs net approved by the Underwrdei's and backfill required for Installation of work under G. All methods of workmon;hi and construction and they s e.rilicotfon t V P Laboratories and all chides must have the name or 'P'- 4 Non-wrre� l-cnnyiny metol p,nb; nl hxrd details or some not specifically described herein trademark of the monufnctwer, and rating in volts and equipment such a; rnolsrs, Aorter and 4 Provide "Do Not Disconnect" lugs on all shall be .ub'rct la the approval u1 the Owner or hu B All excavation work shall be erformed in a safe grounded connections. Nlik . J pf amperes m other proper units marked where they may be P controller 'ahinets, instrument ,,ncings and :. 1 .a, representative easel observed clef the device is Installed secure manner and conform In all OSHA and local safely hyhting fi lutea„ V 5. Provide insulation "Cherries' for mountingof OyN ;hmdnn)s. TI The drawings are flk diagrammatic and show the yenerol B All work shall be executed in n woileanne munner and 1 17 GROUNDING SYSTEM all grounding bars. _ arrangement and location of equiprnshall present a neat and mechanically rigid appearance C, All excavations shall be properly guarded and enl and devices, and sk vt + r are subject to reasonable adjustment and modification when completed, and subject tin the acceptance al Bell protected so as to prevent same from becornsi9 A General 6. "Star" washers shall be used as locking washers on ground lug bolts and all other ground as required by actual field conditions without Atlantic NYNEX Mobile Representative, Ube Engineer or dur,goonu to persons or property connections. additional cost to the Owner his rdecugnee. The general iy3 ro shall be, furnished and installed In ti' s' D Excavate only to the depth retuned for conduit accordance with thy; Nahonol Electn,'rl (-dc, Bell - kk lrz'At.,' ' g his bid, the onracor shall reviewF Specific general grounding notes have been shown on y4 " L Belore submitting hCtthll 1 9 EXAMINATION OF GENERAL Cl(7NSTRUC110N PLANS, AND inslallohon, Conduit shall he :et an firm earth Atlantic NYNEX lobde, and all other ayrnn+as hnvufy all pertinent architectural, structural and mechanical SPECIFICATIONS jut isdidi°n drawings. ' Contractor stroll provide all work and r equipment as necessary. iinN ' � drawings to familiarize himself with all details of E, As soon as the underground equpnln nl is in place arid construction. Any deviation or change train the A The Contractor shall examine the General Constructi , tested, the excavations shall be bo filled The a drawings unit/or specdwohons, or inlerprelaliun The grace oth .m r. hill. nthl to prwid• u tiro Plans, and specifications, insofar as labor noel initial backltlhnq shall be performed simultaneously impedance path t, mirth the purpose i; to reduce tE'! thereof, shall have prior approval of the Owner or his materials and type of construction, etc , that may ( on both sides of [lie equipment so ns not to souse the level of voll ige ddferenhal between oh1e,:Ie representative. affect his work. The suhmirsion of a proposal shall injurious side pressure. All backfill material shall during lightning bi'.,.huges r,) Of rf A% be, construed as evidence thatsuch examination has be tree of large stones or debris Backfill nationals It J UnlTss specified otherwise heaefn, Contractor shall been made and no Inter shuns (or extra labor, shall he spread evenly, uniformly, and lumped in The complete girind :system is compooed of au interior . v rx��tl base his bid proposal with all work to ba performed on equipment or materials which could have been foreseen layers riot exceeding six inches in compacted depth y g P P ring ground sys :m corusishi g of a pcnphen'd hus, n strufjhl time normal working day by examination will be recognized supplemontal bu e:, Inter object (unit) bands, and low F The Contractor shall secure all necessory road openinq impedance path to ground permits, and shall be responsible for backfill and repair of all roadway excavation in accordance with The ground wire ,n the axternol yfound aystem shall Is ', ti,1ip nvt applicable Agency Standards be #2/0 bare :,handed copper woe itYt Y� 11 v +r I 7`�. tidy r u � r - r k51Y9it ' il.C �1•iY ` r Project location. Drawing Deeaription Seal S�INF NEN, yO' wte. seal illny kdr y.�P Ew R. 3 9 >78-22-46 �S NofEB t.: to t hu., — — Bell Atlantic NYNEX Mobile e °<pWCheaARS 4 --- s—zo—ss Issued FOR FILING ® ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS coNSU T. NT INC 4 2 Project ""�" WINE. ��IIIHSA.1AAQ MOBILE CELL SITE INSTALLATION L A S y I (is ar: rn. r 9-6-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 100% REVIEW ENGINEERING - TECHNICAL SEFMCES - CONS1RUCTO MANAGEMENT V9� N - " 9Cr 1275 1 1 yr 2450 MAIN RD SURE M•3555 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY RONI(ONKOkU N.Y.' 11779 O e 8-22-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 60% REVIEW �' R CHS -T � = 1- — p ORIENT PT, NEW YORK p owne Pro(ectNo: Sect #tt4 i S6 . w-12 1EONa.04Y MOVE srrx9x],NY.nn] VOfL AW(89919 49r6(516)609-8191 Revision nate Description (Si6) 981-3990 FAX (5i 6) 981-3977 99FE5 � yxyx ii xd' , xSr1'f�'a J lit. a., �II� s + y'ry . C it a} dj}f i a r ` irH 1.18 WIRING AND CONDUIT1 .G`+too ;div ,I A All above and below-grade wiring shall be WE C. C. Wiring shall lest free of shorts and grounds, tp'i�r %, approved, type THAI, THWN, THHN, XHHW, RHW and RHD ar G The makeup of screwed or tlanged pipe in hangers is B. All electrical equipment shall be protected by heavy rjy.,, ,. art approved equal, unless noted otherwise on drawings prohibited. fiberglass cloth covers. Building wire insulation shall be 60OV, rated riot less 1 All receptacle, shall be tested with a ' w+r,r than 75 degrees celsius, wet or dry. Insulation H All hangers shall be fabricated from steel and C. Conduit pull boxes or equipment that is to be painted circuit tester for proper grounding and x� ' o selection shall be contractor's choice, except where adjustable for elevation, g Polarity n shall be cleaned to remove dirt and reuse or ail specific insulation type or rating is indicated or x It 2. APa called for on itis drawings 2. All switches and control wiring shall be c 9 I. Separate supports consisting of formed steel and D, All conduit, fixtures, equipment and appurtenances festal Ia Inswe proper operation. - r ', , .)'"I Itt rods shall be provided under this Division to suspend shall be thoroughly cleaned and put in first-class ,ll 411.41, ,'v, 1.41,est ' B. All wuing unless otherwise specified on the drawing all recessed and/or surface (of stem) mounted lighting operating condition before being offered for li Tests to demonstrate the capacity specified and ;+'.y +'s? or herein, shall be run m PVC or RGS conduit. fixtures independently of ceiling construction ar,ceptance general operating tharaeterishcs of all apparatus, ' (,, (plaster, sheet rock, etc.). Hangers shall be fully C Romex, BX (AC) and/or MC Cable shall NOT be permitted adjustable to allow fixture level to coincide with E. Contractor shall be, responsible for keeping the shall or conducted m the presence of, ant to the -s the finished ceiling level, and shalt be securely building sGhsfarl fan of, the Owner of his Designee. buildinc nelson; hr, shall remove all rubbish, Debris, D All wiring shall be. electrical grade copper. Insulation shall fastened to the shuctural members of the building cartons, boxes, waste and the like originating Four be 60OV. fr construction. Where recessed lighting fixtures are his work on a doily basis E Where it is Impossible to test out whole system, at time, the may be divided into arts had art E All conduits leaving the Radio Roorn shall be sealed indicated to be installed in areas of suspended y p' p acoustic tine or panel ceilings, the ceiling 1 23 FLASHING tested independently '1r' F. Minimum conduit shall by 5/4" unless specified sus'pensi n channel system will be reintorced as - � �7 iVT oc, necessaryfor righting fixture support b the A. Unless rioted otherwise herein or on the drawings, F All wormy :dull ti tested by itis Conor ,or , and otherwise PP y U witnessed and approved by the Owner or his Designee. Electrical Contractor provide u rnetolhc sleeve for all conduit penetrations I �4 G. Wires shall be color coded. Grounding conductor shall through wells, Hours and calings J Hunger rods, where utilized, shall be cold rolled ,r': have a green calor. Neutral shall have o while color g !9 threaded steel rod, a minimum of I/4" in diameter. B. Close off space between conduit and sleeve villi non-cornbushble These colors shall not be used for any other purpose. G. I'iovate four t4) to , n, of all Equipment, Uhall cog it f1 insulation equal to lire rating of structure, . ar K Contractor shall provide new concrete inserts os and/ar m unicnunm manuals for systems and components f H. All wires shall ha polarized mslnlled. k, 4x, required for all conduit supports. Existing inserts, C. All conduit penetrations shall be core dulled I. Splices m wires mid cables shall be eliminated beams, support cbonnels may be utilized by Chet ' P whenever posable and, where necessary, shall he mode Contractor where feasible and where the existing D. Provide "pitch pockets" for all conduit penetrations 2 i;LRfIf IC.ATES AND GUAItAN11 I' � equipment Is acceptable for the additional trial through root deck. only in accessible pull m junction boxes, outlets, F A fonlrartur Shan anbrmt proof of fire Underwnter's , switch and receptacle boxes. Approvat to utilize any existing support equipment I,tic roust be authorized in advance b Bell Ailnnfic NYNEX inspection of all ehcincal work to the Dwner or His , y 4 NAMEPLATE' AND IDENTIFICATION Designer IF No wiring shall be pulled into conuntil the uthe Mable Representative y ' conduit and box systern is romplete A Fail Panel, Switch, etc , shall have a nameplate, The g Contrartiu shell guarantee and serVb.e, all work for a + 1.20 JUNCTION AND PULL HUXE5 mmneplate shall be made of black Bakelite will; white pennd of one (I) year from Ire Into of on,ceplance K Insulated bushingsshall he installed an all o en engraved letters al least 1/4' high, The nameplates p shall be installed with screws to the t tenor of the A. All buxe�, shall he lasteined to structure with propel 1 S i `d iH`,toll t1110flS ANI)/OP f(1i,ilVAIt NT`. conduit ends. - ' hangar,, and fitting: equipment. L utilize weatherproof filings for all conduit exposed A than e a clerwi d/ur equipment as spectil w the bid My snv q to the weathru 0, Junchon unit pull boxesi provided for conduits 1.25 PAINTING docunrnt: r; to insure a rurnploh, system of suitable one inch trade size aril larger, where indicated quality unit pi ,vide a standatrbled , oropetdrve bests M. Provide nylon dna lines m all charilyconduit and or as necessary to facilitate installation of the A Alf claw panel, and cabinets shall be factory -looms -d - y g Fri all Co'tlro lois to bol sleeves. work, shall be Code gauge galvanized stack of painted, factory hon lied and, if dame ed, shall be - '� 9 requced dimensions, with accessible, removable screw-on covers tour.hed up ,I refini7;ed as directed (after completion U the laical fir the bid documents c that the Contractor N Metailie conduit shall be as manufnatured Ly Republic Where required by the building coivlruchon, furnish and install of the inslalla ton) or equal PVC conduct shall be as mauuloctured by junction find pull boxes in i4os, ial sizes and shapes determined shall install ell equipment and matrnols as iperifi,d ',h,nild the Coniraclor d, u,- 61 subshtule Canon Industries or equal. in the held 1 2b N=',CES:; 0001(`, aunther mnLoriol fir vendor for oro; if nnour specified by name he sholl apply rn wrlucq a sin h approval r ."�s O. Conduits shall be secured in place and protected 13 f' Full boxes shall be provided fur ell cundud nus A Nlherever any outlets, equipment and other dams .it lire, of bel and uholl stair the necbl ur exha c r prevent damage to the work during construction All where necessary, and if naxunum intervals where the requiring s-nvv el adjustment or inspection are field cut nonduds shall be reamed to prevent damage changes m dirertmn total 3fi0 degreest0r(I , every 4-90? Juin.,) concealed and require access through Forcing, wells, mvoly d A` flours, or uedmgs, and the ircress doors are not ( line flnntim tin zholl be res oneble L, rruvids t a x➢"e'n, to wine. P I n D. ',¢es of all coxes shall conform with the minimum ;Pecihed under oilier Gxdnrls, furnish fnclary mode, supporting Tili and aamphee, it neressory, for n requirements of the NLG., unless noted otherwn:x un completely Basrnhed, key-operated, heavy hal occoe, proper evgluAiwi by the Owner or his D(­,ignee at lime F' the ends of all conduit runs ,hall be provided with " a„ caps dcl construction to avoid fling with dehll':, the drawings or bereo doors and frames of .ubmdhd .4ddilionally, the C,ontrnrt r hall be 'r ' etc ren pou^rbir lu narnbur;e the Uwnrf n f i•' Ooeeicnee for L21 0L5CONNI_LT SWIICHFS B Thr; access hours shall have lie sortie fire ratings as Dist•; rcP, rn,l,d ur the evaluation til the si.h litution, i '• �;i, ,: 0. Junction boxes or pull boxes' shall be hunched mid the roof, ane e if ininu n u which they are whether fir wit the suhshtubon io uppi„ved in ileoulled to uvad excessive runs or bends between A Provide all Service and Equipment dlsronneJ switches installed, and be a minimum of 18" x IS bol in no o, sh„wn on lire drawings rose shall they be less Than 6' lunger in all Juch ictal ur.r meal ;,hall Le w able If the rate of 'L 5 outlets n� herein sp..nOeA dimensions thus tire rn e ;tes serviced. I y limos the Jn c, I ,,it hp itis (loner or lin Uesiynen„ T,xA ]r d 'h lI dn, a„m dlY aInn; re, el d f invoice -h. All equipment disconnect swil,he5 riotIncluded with 1 27 FINAL IN AL LATIO N '"�,r•T';, equipment shall be provided us Shawn an the druwvu_j.: U the (loner ii hi, Ds:aynee «°:u+rv,; the nyhl to reject or stated herein' and shall be in a NEMA I or NEMA, 3R. A All conduit, wmuy and equipment shall be lharoughly , 1 19 HANGERS AND SUPPORTS any and oU -uM,litulion� and his dr furn ;hall be - " enclosure for indoor m i for n application; rleuned and put a first-class operu ing condition A. Provide systems of supports for all c conduit, fixtures, re,5pec.hvety Uules., noted otherwise, heavy duly, before being offered for acceptance ronsndemd hqn ^ sctr Gild equipment complete with hangers, anchorage, sway clan-fused, quick-make, quirk -hreak type ducnnnecicrJii 4 if rs � brac , 'unistruls” rods, bolls, angles, channels, switches shall he used Disconnect switches shell he p, Upon completion til all mslallGtion wail., the e plates, inserts, To coat panting, fastening, nnrl Coi l Etc, tine, Square "D , Weshnghous or equal. p I g Contra, shall re ince. trout as-built” drawings all optical and appurtenances required to make hie rellechng all circuitry a: installed in the held a," , supporting system complete in all respects Fued disconnect swih;hes shall he used where These Jrowings shall be forwarded to the Owner or His militated on (tie drawing, or as required by equipment Des, nee, for rncorparntinn In the original drawing; " e' l rl ii H. IL is the intention of this specificutiun Thal ail nnmufaclurei and m lu[urr use. ` hangers bhnll be supported from budding construction The intention at this specification is to provide C the opaahnq meehamsm of cut switches shall be so supports which, in each case, shall not weaken fir designed thol the switches may ba locked able "UN" 128 TESTS AND INSPECTION, - N v unduly stress the buildlnq construction a "OFf" positions A All tests, as may be required by the Owner or hi; I. Hangers for the work in the hunq ceiling U Each fused safely switch shall be bift equipped with Designee or local governing agency, shall be performed shall be supported tram the budding o complete spore set of spare fuses Fuses shall be by this Contractor Tests shall be. repeated as z r structure. dual element and approved by the manuhichuen for its requued with no additional costs l0 the Owner civ intended use, Is. C. Provide all angles, channels, plates, and bolts of B Test ell the wiring systems and equipment Perforin r'cAa other structural shapes necessary to fasten conduit A disconnect swilrfn shop be Pinioned eoall motors, all tests required by Local, State and Federal - Y Authorities Provide all labor, materials, « hangers h1 the building construction. appliances, equipment, instruments, electricity and D Hangers on supports shall be based on the weight of transportation and engage, where specified, : lot."the item and for conduit or raceway with a mrwmum Independent testing laboratories to conduit the x concentrated load of 250 pounds al the center of the 1 23 PROTECTION AND CLEANING o died tests ) wpPv2' sp ,C _7• ';'ra rrot. span between supports. A All Inn hats and equipment shall be properly and s s 1 effectively protected. Conduits must be capped du'nng k m ' E. Rigid galvanized conduit shall be secured with construction so as to prevent obstruction and damage approved supports within 3' - 0' spacing. EMT Any damage resulting in the failure to use proper couplings shall be supported within 18 inches of each r fy precautions cs to this work shall be replaced or side of couplings, and supports shall not exceed 10 - altered to the sahsfachon of the Owner or his 6 spacinq Designee A q(L, F. Direction Changes - A hanger or support shall be installed close to the point of a ;change in direction of all conduit runs, in either a horizontal or r s v r vertical plain. AI n .;i 31YK,�I rt Ft tg.c ; Proest Ixahon: Drawing Description Seal � OF NEW 1' Data: Scalar Ar"ing Na :g v 1 -- - 4 o DD-22-96 AS NOTED .. a �T BB Q' 9 lfC Drawn By; �Checkad k'+Sa i - - 9-20-96 ISSUED FOR FILING Bell Atlantic NYN Mobile * R R r o C? Pal No: ^ wx�, grit �1 ® ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS - 9-6-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 100% REVIEW MOBILE CELL SITE INSTALLATION CONSULTANTS INC. 1 96-723 ENGINEERING - TECHNICAL SENVICCS - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, TN 2 96-1275 24850 MAIN RD SUIT M•3555 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY RONKONKOMA N.Y. 11779 �O0 N Oona Proacl No: "Sheet Itf 8-22-96 ISSUED FOR BANM 60% REVIEW S T F- C _r ORIENT PT, NEW YORK v re-v irfxuur Mr,Snw1E1.uv,unci.unix two sew�a•Mid +ro nele69 (516) 981-3990 FAk (516) 981-3971 FE 1 � J %XXX Revision Data Description 1 NOV 71996 ' sou?AoLn lo, w m�unc NOA$I 40'-3" (483"] 92' 224" 40'-0" (480"] -- - -- -- ---- -- j�Q - FIELD WORK J9 FIELD WORK — I I I FIELD WORK] 58 j 5 1 1 5 17 I I I = 50 SO 1O III 8 , 50 2 j 18 10 1 5 II �7) 5 1) -- 5 52 fff 52 _ I - 5 52 I � 50 5 w 4� 50 OILI 1 50 SERVICE ENTRANCE (I� 50 5 545O d / - (59 78 — -- 94 13116" _________-_-_J_ __ _ 246" ELEVATION A ELEVATION C 11'- 11" (143"] _ _ _—` 40'-0" (480"] ---_- 39 i l'-8" (740"'] 248146 TLib 172�Yi6" 7�Yr6 95,�6" 39 FIELD WORK ---- _— ----____—__ - FIELD WORK (31 39 FIELD WORK 7 r., 28 FIELD WORK � FIELD WORK O = 8 8 - 18 o_ ^�,g�'` I b 3 0 = `I 0 ui m ai 31 ELEVATION D 17 66) 4s 4s ELEVATION B 10 A ( a) NOTES.' ROOFING MEMBRANE FIELD INOR!< 1. EPS BOARD INSULATION IS LISTED TO HAVE A FLAMESPREAD CONCRETE SKIN _ OF 25 OR LESS AND SMOKE DEVELOPED OF 450 OR LESS THIS SHELTER NOT WITH A MAXIMUM THICKNESS OF 2 INCHES AT iPCF DENSI71< EPS BOARD INSULATION I F(OR HUMAN HABITATIO 4EPS ETE SKIN FLOOR FLAN POLYISOCYANURATE FOAM INSULATION HAS BEEN TESTED TO A CONCRETE SIGN BOARD INSULATION MAXIMUM THICKNESS OF 3 INCHES AT 1.9PCF DENSITY AND HAS . . .A FLAMESPREAD OF 25 AND A SMOKE PRODUCED OF 395. FRP ONCRETE SKIN2. INTERIOR PANELING IS LISTED TO HAVE A FLAMESPREADAGGREGATEOF 200 OR LESS. TYPICAL ROOSECTIO 3. THIS SHELTER IS CLASSIFIED AS USE GROUP S, TYPE IVCONSTRUCTION, 1988/1991 SBC, AND IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH 1988/LIANCE WITH 1993 BOCA AND 1993 NEC. AL50INCOMP1997 SMC 1993 BOCA MECHANICAL CODE. NATIONAL BUILDING CODE, AND i/8" TILE '�'" fiib0ifiiPPUl4• 4. DESIGN CRITERIA: PLYSEM ROOF LIVE LOAD = 50 PSFFRP ROOF PANEL DEAD LOAD = 32 PSF CONCRETE SKIN li WALL PANEL DEAD LOAD = 26 PSF n 7^, FLOOR PANEL DEAD COAD = 26 PSF EPS BOARD INSULATIO �•,1.;. , '.;r SECTION Aly TYPICAL W1ALL WIND VELOCITY = 100 MPH WIND LOAD HORIZONTAL = 47 PSF CONCRETE SKI WIND LOAD VERTICAL = 33 PSF SCALE: N.TS, SEISMIC ZONE = 4 1YPICALFLOOR , CONFIDENTIAL SECION 5 BUILDING WILL BE PLACED ON A SLAB OR PERIMETER BEAM "ANY ITEMS REQUIRED UNDER FOUNDATION BY OTHERS, PART 111 28CFR36 TO BE 5. SHELTER Fc' = 5000 PSI 0 28 DAYS INDEX OF SHEETS PROVIDED BY ON-SITE OWNER " tl N DESCRIPTION 7. BUILDING SHALL 8E LOCATED 5 FEET (5'-0") OR MORE FROM .1 EXTE lOR ELEVATIONS BLDG. NO. LINE OR INTERIOR LOT LINE BETWEEN IT AND +2 INT RIOR ELEVAQnoNs ANY PROPERTYr,3 CONDUIT ELEVAITIONS ANY OTHER BUILDING. *4-1 ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC 1 IIID ' IIL_i" IILJ' 4 2 ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC 1 - — III i 91 1� 1111E\d �p1 �d M JJLLII 5 ALARM WIRING 0 1L1'� 6 ITE usr 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-3'77- 1030 7 ENO ON E T L CONTROL & HVAC WIRING 8 CAB E RACK g MDO5E SECURITY SrSTEM THESE PLANS ARE THE CONFID- C p-2 HALO GRG DETAIL TRPDE SPROPERTY ECRETS OFNFIBREBOND UWN.BI': P PEDROZA DATE: 22/2998 BELL /I Tl /I A1TI(i NYNEX MOBILE ,11 FOU DATION CORPORATION. ANY USE OF LJ L L_L /-1 / L/-1I V I Sl STRUCTURA LAYOUT - ROOF CHIC.BY: DATE: 9/ S2 STRUCTURAL LAYOUT - FLOO THESE DRAWINGS AI THE ( 3 /� TT O � S3 STRUCT RAL LAYOUT - SlDE P NEL A INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN - 11 1 -� x 40' -0" EQU MENT SHELTER ER D 54 STR CT RAL Lv1Y0UT - SID PANEL C FOR ANY REASON OTHER THAN ENG.BY: DATE: B 55 T UCT L YOUT - EN PANELS B & D AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED I B'Y FIBREBOND CURPL�RATInN IS - 0111, DUT - FLOOR ASSEMBLY i LAY � T 57 U 7 RAL r PROHIBITED- HESE DFAWTLY gpp,By; DATE: I'✓�G EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS —�� /ON AL - HAVE BEEN DISTRIB- _ D FAWINGS GONE IN UTED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING ---- _ DRAWINGS WHICH HAVE WORK TO BE - ♦ = DENOTES DRAW I CEIVIIVG OR DATE: DIY RE � THE FIELD, THAT ANYONE APP.BY: ;� A c DWG. OBTAINING POSES- SCALE. SHEET ELEVATILN KEY OTHERWISE EMWILL - _ ® GN 3/8/96 REVISED OVERHANG DIMENSIONS 3 d' f� SIDN OF THEM WILL BE EX PROJECT NO. ig"=10 NO. � N0. D 3230 PF ESSLY NOTIFIED OF THEIR VISION APP. DATE - REV. BY DATE RE CVNFIDENITIAL NAruRE ..._. -^-- 39'-3 7/16" (471 7116-] 39'-3 7/76" 1471 7/16 95 11/16" 7 11/16" 112 5/16" 7 11/16" 248 1/16" 4 48° 73„ 4 7 72 tI— �' 340 h 7 7 14 40 3 3 SIREN 640 2 6 104 6 3 12 N �=l 4 24" K-4 4" 54" 84" _ _ i': 74 78„ Ll 'o 2 ZO 7 Li \ / 10 (75 � 7 `N — 4 'v II _ELEVATION A L 19" 6, 72" sG ----- /2" 3' 10'-11 3/8" [731 3/8] 10'-17 3/8" [131 318"] 10'-71 3/8" [131 3/8'1ELEVA71ON C MOUNT RECEPTACLE (60) 4 6" 17" ON GENERATOR FRAME. 50" 46" 18" io !O 5„ 4 2 2Yz \_ 4 M 18 0 40'-0" � 7 O " io ❑ 2 248 7/76" - —7 77/16" -- — 112 5/76" 7 71/76" / 95 71 16" -- iq 36" 3 30" FIELD WORK 2 ^ 7 �3 7 3 4 3 28 N 18 24„ ELEVATION B ELEVATION D — 96 — 4 ° 2 ELEVATION E 4 2 69 2 67 24 O 4 1 >J • 40 M — © C O6 'rt P3„ 40 4 34" 38 [ o 0 0 6 H l 7 4 o � 62"' xx 4 46 4G v 46 24,. 5 © CI rn '60 -�- M 0 !0 71 CEILING VIEW ELEVATION F ELEVATION G ELEVATION N AN so A S'i obi ' ;^,�4:. C '•:4` 41 ,4 rti a.. CONFIDENTIAL JI N I 1 1996 BLDG. NO. NO C 1@ 40 1. MEASUREMENT SHOWN BETWEEN SERVICE ENTRANE IF' I B R E B 0 N D EQUIPMENT, DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT, AND SURGE B O PROTECTION EQUIPMENT ARE GUIDELINE MEASUREMNTS. 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-377- 1030 �D THE MEASUREMENT CAN BE ALTERED IN ORDER TC THESE PLANS ARE THE CONFID- A CORRECTLY INSTALL THE RIGID NIPPLE THAT COME ENTIAL PROPERTY AND CONTAIN DWN.BY: P. PEOROZA DATE: 2129196 q CLOSEST TO THE MEASUREMENT TRADE SECRETS OF FIBREBOND BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE B.tvAnoN <er CORR IRATIONJ. AN'Y USE OF OR CHK.BY: DATE: E3J NFO Ih ATIONCONTAINED HEREIN EQUIPMENT SHELTER FOR PNY SSLSON OTHER THAN ENG.BY• DATE: AS EXPRESSLYEXPRESSLYAUTHORIZED BY FIHREBONJD CORPORA I CORPORATN IS PROHIBITED. THEOE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN DISTRIB- —APP.BY: DATE: 31yht, IV TLc VR ELEVATIONS cVATIVS UTED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ANYONE RECEIVING OR OTHEFNISE OBTAINING POSSES- APP.BY. � DATE:3/V//a SIGN OF THEM WILL BE EX- SCALE: SHEET DWG. REV. BY DATE REVISION PRESS LY NO IFIED OF THEIR PROJECT NO. _ " N0. N0. E ISION APP. DATE J8"-!D D 3230 I, coNo-Ih,EnITIAL NATURE 39'-37116- [471 7/16 39'-3 7/16" [471 7116-7 -- 95 71/16" 7 11/16" 112 5/16" 7 17/16" 248 1/16" 7 72 4 3 (A 1� 40 6 IRMJ �w�w 4 � 2 4 14 40 A 3 3 SIREN 7 O 34 65 3 SEE NOTE 5 V � 4 62 7 I � 12 74 <0 4 ., 5 7 2 m 2 7 7 Q` 4 90 I.2" ELEVATION A ELEVATION C MOUNT RECEPTACLE (60) 10'-il 3/8" [731 3/8"1� ON GENERATOR FRAME. SEE NOTE 4 4 4 19 7 7 4 'D 4 2 40,_0„ [480"] o78 3 4 O2 7 2481116- _ 711116"' 112 5/16"' 711116" 9511116- ! FIELD WORK LZ 2 3 `j 7 3 4 39 28 4 — SEE NOIE f 18 h CDETAIL DR 7 DETAIL SEE NOTE 2 � 2 ELEVATION D ELEVATION E 2 69 2 4[-@ 24 4 ELEV4 ATION Ba o tv o 4 _ 6 6 t° SEE 4 4 .-- NOTE O 40 SEE 6 44 38 6 m NOTE g b 6 40 67 O7 4 4 17 qg 4 46 46 0 \ O5 f0 f0 7 ) 1 ib CEILING VIEW ELEVATION F ELEVATION G ELEVATION H �.a�op,ED LeARC�.ipi NOTE L F 5 " CONDUIT KEY 1. CONDUIT SHOULD BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN. ANY ..... CHANGE TO 90• BENDS, OFFSETS, AND SADDLES A_C SHOULD BE DONE ONLY WHEN NEEDED AND SHOULD T'STAT/ALARM PSC ✓ r ' •j �''S' BE UNDER GUIDANCE OF A QUALIFIED CREW LEADER. A=1/2" AA-112" XA=1/2" ANY CHANGE MUST BE WITHIN THE GUIDELINES OF B=3/4" BB=3/4" XB=3/4" PROCEDURIE' 4-1 GENERAL CONDUIT RULES, N C=1" CC=1" XD=1 14"/" D=1 1/4" D0—i 1/4" " 2. RUN CONDUIT&NT0 EXTENDER RING OF (59). E=1 1/2 EE=1 7/2 XE=1" i/2 F=2" FF=2" XF=2 J. BEND CONDUIT ©&® DOWN TO 24" OVER G=2 7/2" GG=2 1/2" XG=2"1/2" GENERATOR CONTROL CABINET AND CHANGE -0 CONFIDENTIAL H=J" HH=3 XH=3 SEALTIGHT. DO NOT ENTER BACK OF CONTRJL CONSOLE. CLAMP SEALTIGHT. 4. RUN CONDUIT®INTO TOP KNOCKOUT OF B. (40) KOHlLFR GENERATOR SYSTEM ,II II I I I9 AT ELEVATION B", GIFNERAL ARRANGEMENT 5. RUN CONDUIT®BEHIND CONDUIT ®• BLDG. NO. 6CONDUIT (DCONTAINS CIRCUITS 20, CONDUIT ®CONTAINS CIRCUITS 6, 1 E6 18. 0, & 2' 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 316-377-1030 C O THESE PLANS ARE THE E CONFID- A H D EN71A CONTAINDWN.BY: P. PEDROZA DATE: 212'1'6 13ELL ATLANTIC Y X MOBILE SECRETS OF COPCRN. ANY U�E F CHK.BY: DATE: EDRAWINGS OR HE / Id QUIPMNSHELTEINFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN I I —VX 40 '-0 ER FOR ANY REASON OTHER THAN ENG.BY• DATE: ElEVARON KEY AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED BY STRICTLY PROHIBITED. THESE BREB�OND CORPORATION IS APP.BY: DATE: 3I`II`ll,_, G CONDUIT ELEVATIONS DRANINGS HAVE BEEN DISTRIB- UTED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ANYONE RECEIVING OR APP,BY: DATE:.3/Q%IP� OTHERWISE: OBTAINING POSSES- SCALE: SHEET DWG' D - 32,30 SIGN OF THEM WILL BE EX- PROJECT NO. DATE REVISION flAPPDATFg'_I'�' NO.REV. BY DATE REVISION PRFSSLY NOTIFIED OF THEIR COIIFIDENTIAL NATURE TO AUTO TRANSFER (3) #4 #3/O SERVICE 120/240 VAC _ PANEL CIRCUIT DESIGNATION: NIA AND LOCATION.' NIA — LOAD SCHEDULE -- w w jV) rzt LD Lo LOAD PER PHASE (VA) LOAD Ln LOAD LOAD PER PHASE (VA) o w w n �O C) 4 W V � ti PHASE UNIT PHASE z o V A Qy DESCRIPTION UNIT o 3 I ?. G 200A1 - - - - j SN 3 's o v A Q C — — DESCRIPTION d V.A. IC \\ \ 2 j/80 A B C v i 30A JOA 7 #10 2 #8's RED T T RED THHN 10,000 8 2 30 X - 2784 - 2784 1 HVAC #2 2 18 62 7 #10 1 2784 - 2784 - X 30 2 8 10,000 THHN --0 I 1 �� 61 BLK �� BLK THHN 10,000 8 2 30 X 2784 2784 7 4 17 HVAC #1 10,000 THHN — -- - - - 21 °� O6 3 1 2784 2784 X 30 2 8 75A 3 #12's RED �� 1� RED THHN 10,000 12 1 15 X 900 — 90 10- INTERIOR LIGHTS 6 12 O 100 - 100 72 10,000 THHN 30Fl O 5 EXTERIOR LIGHT 1 �� BLK _ — INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR 00 0 73 BLK T — 360 180 411 8 00 0 X 3p 2 10,000 THHN I 20A THHN 10,000 72 1 20 X 1620 1 RECEPTACLES 3 72's PHOTOCELL 7 1 1000 1000 �� — 64 RECTIFIER #1 RED THHN 10,000 12 7 20 X 11080 3G0 3 INTERIOR RECEPTACLES , 0 00 9 1 1000 - 1000 - X 30 2 10,000 THHN 30A TELCO BOARD 00 20 BLK T 2�� BLK THHN 10,000 12 1 20 X 720 - - 360 2 RECEPTACLES 2 00 2 10,000 THHN -- -- 76 I _ - X 30 ENVIRONMENTAL q 1 1000 1000 15A / 1 RED RED THHN 10,000 12 1 15 X - �2p 120 7 CONTROL PANEL 4 22 RECTIFIER #2 6 3 #12's 1000 - X 3�0 2 10,000 THHN 30A 7 1 1000 - _ - �J QLK �"T� T BLK THHN 10,000 10 2 30 X 2000 2000 1 O 1 1000 1000 - - X 30 2 10,000 THHN I 1 — HEATER Q 15 RED RED THHN 10,000 10 2 30 X - 2000 2000 1 18 3 #1 O's SEE DETAIL RECTIFIER #3 - 3p 2 10,000 THHN --- /24 ON SH. 4-2 1 1000 i007: 1000 X 15A BLK - - 50 2 SMOKE DETECTORS 20 23 - & NOTE 7 BELOW 7 BLK !lam --0 THHN 10,000 72 1 75 X 120q1 1000 10 (� 19 X RED 1�� RED THHN 10,Oo0 72 1 15 X - 250 - 250 1 VENT SYSTEM 22 26 27 28 RECTIFIER #4 1000 X 3p 2 10,000 THHN — — 3 ' r� q 1 1000 - BL,K _ _ 21 1 SECURITY SYSTEM 24 0 33 L / BLK �T� THHN 10,000 12 1 15 X 21 _ 7 1000 1000 - - X 30 2 10,000 THHN — BATTERY CHARGERI 0 35 23 RECTIFIER #5 RED ! RED THHN 10,000 72 1 20 X - ,7500 - 1500 1 BLOCK HEATER 26 rj� 1 1 pop - 1000 - X .30 2 10,000 THHN — — — 2 4 3 #12's 60 BLK T r� BLK U _ X LJp 2 10,000 THHN I 2 1 1000 1000 RED i ',RED - - 30 RECTIFIER #6 — 2 9 1 1000 - 1000 - X ,30 2 10,000 THHN 30A BLK - - 32 X ,3 p 2 10,000 THHN BLK T 3 1 l000 loon - - - -- RECTIFIER #7 RED !� RED 34 1 1000 - 1000 - X 30 2 10,000 THHN 30A SPACE 3 BLK T BLK - - 36 35 1 1000 1000 - - X 30 2 10,000 THHN I - z U Q RECTIFIER #8 RED �� RED J 1 1000 - 1000 - X 30 2 10,000 THHN BLK r� BLK - - 40 �� i RED 39 RED - - 42 c0 Alun, SPACE _ �. 5850 - S Q I TOTAL KVA ^F ^ %� 's 448 CONTINUOUS 33.04 b ; ONTINU 4 � C CONTINUOUS X 1.25 SUBTOTAL Ke CONTINUOUS 8000 8100 - 2784 2784 - A - NON-CONTINUOUS ;r '- 2784 2784 NON CONTINUOUS 11. 14 7 NON-CONTINUOUS SQUARED r- ° ...... PHASE: 1 WIRES: 3 MANUFACTURER: l VOLTAGE: 120/240 CYCLE: 60 <onmmmm�"„� 4. TYPE AND CATALOG NUMBER: NQOD42L225CUIIJQOD220002MB - FB #27613127614 TOTAL KVA 44. 18 NEUTRAL: 225 AMPS MAIN BREAKER: 200 AMP FRAME AIC: 10,000 TRIP: 200 AMPS NO EQUAL: El EQUAL XQ S X FLUSH ❑ TOTAL AMPS 184.08 CONFIDENTI,AL 225 AMP SURFACE ❑ MAIN LUGS: AMPS MAIN COPPER BUS. MOUNTING. MAINS: TOP 0 BOTTOM ❑ IIA I 11996 2 BLDG. N0. OTESALL WIRE TO BE J/12 THHN/7HWN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. F B E B COLOR CODE: A0 = BLACK 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 316-377-1030 Ba = RED NEUTRAL = WHITE - "� n / GROUND = GREEN (HESE PLANS ARE THE CONFID- OEl l ATLANTIC LANTIl� NYNEX MOBILE 2, ALL WORK TO CONFORM TO N.E.C. ENTIAL PROPERTY AND CONTAIN DWN.BY: P. PEDROZA DATE: 2�29�86 BELL TRADE SECRETS OF FIBREBOND LATEST STATE ADOPTED EDITION. ,�1 3. LABEL SERVICE DISCONNECT WITH A CORPOIRATION. ANY USE OF CHIC.DY: N w DATE: Slyl f6 l— i RED TAG. THESE DRAWINGS AI THE /\ I 1 -8 X 40 '-0 EQ 4. SHELTER 4. SWITCH LEC CONDUCTORS SHALL BE THE FORINFOANY RE CONTAINED HEREIN SAME COLOR AS CIRCUIT CONDUCTORS. FOR AMY REASON OTHER THAN ENC.BY: DATE: 5. WIRES #10 AWG AND SMALLER SHALL BE AS FIRREEXPRONDSLY CORAUTPORATION — SOLID. WIRES JB AWG AND LARGER BY FITLY PND CORPORATION IS APP.BY: DATE:'31ghI, ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC # 1 SHALL BE STRANDED. STRICTLY PROHIBITED THESE DISTRIB- 6. ALL CIRCUITS REQUIRE SEPARATE GROUNDS. UTED 'DRAWIIT HAVE BEEN UNDERSTANDING 7, SMOKE DETECTORS ARE WIRED AS TANDEM UTED 'WITH THE UNDERSTANDING ��ly.(o DETECTORS. RUN RED INTERCONNECTION THAT WISE O RECEIVING OR APP.BY: �•,✓. DATE: L3 #12 AWG WIRE BETWEEN SMOKE DETECTORS. OTHERWISE OBTAINING POSSES- SCALE: SHEET 4 _ q DWG D - 323 0 CONNECT 70 RED AND RED/WHITE WIRES SION (OF THEM WILL BE EX- PROJECT NO. NONE NO. I N0. ON CONNECT TO RED REVISION APP. DATE PRESS?LY NOTIFIED OF THEIR REV. BY DATE CONFIIDENTIAL NATURE. 0 V I 120/240 VAC 1)0' 200 AMP SERVICE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY SITE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR LINE I SERVICE LATERAL —� / MAIN OR DROP 200A� — — j SN S G� BREAKER LLOAD \ O SERVICE BOND N d� 200 AMP SERVICE BOND SEE NOTE 3 & 4 MAIN BREAKER SEE NOTE 3&4 24 FIELD WIRING � G O BRN #J/0 #4 GROUNDING ELECTRODE —� SURGE BLK s BRN INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE ARRESTOR WHT - _ GRY BLK 2 1 GENERATOR o BO I SURGE WITH ARTICLE 250—H O CKT #20 WHT WHT �— I lA I CONTROL —�— :�7 ARRESTOR3/4" CONDUIT 7 4 38 N 2" CONDUIT 4 #10's I— — — G O 3 #310's, 1 #4 (TYPE THHN) ' #10 (TYPE THHN) 72 200 AMP AUTO AUTO TRANSFER GENERATOR ROOM SN SG� TRANSFER 40KW O3 SMOKE OE7ECTOR SHUTDOWN WIRING KOHLER #,3/O O GENERATOR 2" CONDUIT 40KW q� 38 3 #J/0's, 1 #4 KOHLER (TYPE THHN) GENERATOR BO 2" CONDUIT 3 #3/0's, 1 #4 3 G (TYPE THHN) #4 200 AMP 1 MAIN BREAKER #3/0 #4 o PANELBOARD O MAIN BREAKER POWER RISER BLOCK DIAGRAM PANELBOARD II O I ' I � _ pPn(sPED;uAs�r pi NOTES: y9 =�I� 4k'..•' C r+urafuc. W 1. ------ DASHED ONES DENOTE FIELD WORK. 2. ALL CIRCUIT BREAKERS ARE 10,000 A.I.C. TYPICALLY. A.LC. RATING MAY CHANGE AS ELECTRICAL SUPPLY DEMANDS CHANGES. CONFIDENTIAL 3. SERVICE BOND IS TO BE MADE BY DEVICES nll I 11996 (STRAPS, SCREWS, ETC.) SUPPLIED BY EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER. IF NO SUCH DEVICE IS WITH A MINIMUM SUPPLIOF #/O AWGTOFORE400DAMP L 1 GHTI NG SCHEDULE ED, BOND IS BLDG. N0. SERVICE, #2 AWG FOR 300 AMP SERVICE, 1� l�T #4 AWG GREEN FOR 200 AMP SERVICE, AND MANUFACTURER MANUFACTURER ELECTRICAL FIBREBOND QUANTITY J� 1 #8 AWG GREEN FOR 100 AMP SERVICE. PART NUMBER CHARACTERISTIC PART NUMBER 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-377-1030 4. WHEN SERVICE OVERCURRENT DISCONNECT IS HUBBELL NRG-806 120V 10OW 23974 1 THESE PLANS ARE THE CONFID— FIELD INSTALLED, A TEMPORARY SERVICE BOND LITNONIA LB240A 120V 9OW 23789 8 TRADE SECRETS of FIBREeoND ENTIAL PROPERTY AND CONTAw DwN.BY: P. PEDROZA DATE: 2/29/ 96 BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE WILL BE INSTALLED FOR SAFETY PURPOSE. THESE CORPORATION. ANY USE OF CHK.BY: DATE: 5. CONDUCTOR OVERCURRENT PROTECTION DEVICES THESE DRAWINGS AI THE NFl RMATI°" CONTAINED "ERF'" 11 '-8 X 40 '-0 EQUIPMENT SHELTER ARE SELECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1996 NEC FOP ANY REASON OTHER THAN ENG.BY: DATE: AS EXPRESSO! AUTHORIZED '/ BY GTL'i PND &TED RATIONTHESE IS APP.BY: DATE:3'gh(,. ELECTRICAL SCHEMATIC 2 (ARTICLE 240-3). STRICTLY panes CORP THESE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN DISTRIB- 6. CONDUCTOR SIZING IS SELECTED FROM 1996 NEC UTED WITHI THE UNDERSTANDING THAI ANYONE RECEIVING OR APP BY- DATE: .3 (ARTICLE 22°- 106). OTHERWISE OBTAINING POSSES— "'�` / SCALE: SHEET DWG. SIGH OF THEM WILL BE EX— PROJECT N0. NONE NO. 4 - 2 NO. D - 3230 REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE PRESSLE NOTIFIED of THEIR COIJFIDENTIAL NATURE ' IIII I 71 47 47 THE COMMERCIAL POWER FAILURE RED GENERAL GENERATOR ALARM NSC ORANGE 1B RELAY IS CONNECTED TO TERMINALS 1 15 REMOVE KOHLER WIRE 12 AND NA & NC ON TRANSFER SWITCH RED CONNECT TO PIN 32. THIS ORANGE DOOR. THE NORMALLY OPEN I 3�-- 16 ALARM WILL SOUND IF ANY I C' CONTACTS CLOSE UPON POWER UP PROBLEM WITH THE GENERATOR III-- OF THE BLDG. CONTACTS OPEN ARISES. UPON LOSS OF POWER SENDING AN ALARM. SEE WIRING DETAIL BELOW. I LOW FUEL SENSOR 47 h TB- 1 YELLOW 0 1 0 16 BLUE I I LOW FUEL ALARM N�C BLACK 1 SMOKE ALARM YELLOW a 2 0 TIMER BYPASS ALARM 1 BLUE 6 THE LOW FUEL CONTACT WILL OPEN ( ORANGE (AIR CONDITIONER FAILURE) I WHEN FUEL LEVEL DROPS TO APPROX. � BLACK HIGH TEMP. ALARM 1 ORANGE o 3 0 1/4 OF TANK CAPACITY. C 2 ` 0 4 0 y WIRE DIRECTLY TO LOW FUEL TIMER BYPASS ALARM f BLUE 050 I SENSOR. (AIR CONDITIONER FAILURE) l BLUE 060 WHITE 0 70 ORANGE 3 LOW TEMP. ALARM WHITE 080 18 HIGH TEMP. ALARM ORANGE ( BLUE 0 g 0 19 4 — INTRUSION ALARM { BLUE 0100 ALARMS FROM PULL WIRES TO SURGE ARRESTOR ALARM _ PULL WIRES TO ` VIOLET 0110 ENVIRONMENTAL ITEM (47) AND FOR SURGE ARRESTOR ALARM, TB 1I TEM' (47) AND AUTHORIZED ENTRY { VIOLET 0720 PANEL SEE SH. 5 TERMINATE CONNECT TO TB- 1,2,&3. ItiED 13 TERMINATE ( WHITE 0130 NORMALLY OPEN CONTACTS WILL I I SURGE ARRESTOR ALARM I WHITE WHITE 1 BLACK 14 0140 CLOSE UPON POWER UP. CON- LOW TEMP. ALARM WHITE I TACTS WILL OPEN IF ELEMENTS _ _ _ RED 075e 21 8 ARE BLOWN OR /F A.C. POWER COMMERCIAL POWER FAILURE RED 0160 r YELLOW 0170 FAILS. CELL SITE ON EMERGENCY POWER YELLOW 0180 l ORANGE 0190 n YELLOW 1 GENERATOR FAILURE ALARM { ORANGE 0200 SMOKE ALARM 15 YELLOW 2 33 BLACK 0210 LOW FUEL BLACK 0220 0230 22 BLUE INTRUSION ALARM � 6 9 0240 BLUE TRANSFER AUX. CONTACTS SEE 10 SH, 9 1 VIOLET 11 CELL SITE ON EMERGENCY POWER 10 11 YELLOW 17 CONNECT TO AUX-CONTACTS ON I y AUTHORIZED ENTRY VIOLET X-FER SWITCH, CONTACTS SHALL YELLOW 12 18 CLOSE UPON X-FER CHANGE TO 6 EMERGENCY POSITION, SEE WIRING L— II J DETAIL BELOW. L i 3 R- AUTO CKT. 18 AUTO TRANSFER TRANSFER O O 1 AI MP 1 T- 1 A 7 T NA 2T SEE CELL SITE ON EMERGENCY 1 �MP + POWER FAILRALARM TRANSFORMER 4- SEEAL T_ B 4 POWER ALARM NC 73 ABOVE. ABOVE. m R1-POTTER BRUMFIELD KOP11A15- 12 R 1 71 /2 R- 1 27 aUu tl�'Irruu�ru�i AUTO TRANSFER :°,^,!?Cy!.,, INSIDE DOOR A .r '••, 28 SEE CONNECTING DIAGRAM NEUTRAL '`n ° r,e �'J'"ri rrrrrbr,r111I1PU0,0 NOTE. NOTE: ALL ALARM WIRING TO BE R- 7 IS SUPPLIED WITH AUTOMATIC TRANSFER. CONFIDENTIAL f/18 AWG. ypp 111996 BLDG. NO. — 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 316-377- 1030 THESE PLA.NJS ARE THE CONFID- ENTIAL PROIPERTY AND CONTAIN I, N.BY: P. PkDA6 BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE CORPTRADE SECRETS OF FIBREBOND THESE ORDRAWYNN SNY USE OR THE CHK.BY: � 6 / / c T / INFORMATIOIN CONTAINED HEREINI I r-8 X 4� r-O EQ(JIPML NI SHELLER FOR ANY REASON OTHER THAN ENG.BY:AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED /� I n p I /� / o ^ I /�BY FIBREBCDND CORPORATION ISAPP.BY: ALA M V V II \ I VlJDRAWI G PROHIBITED. THESEDRA\^lINGS IHAVE BEEN DISTRIB- UTED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ANYOINE RECEIVING OR APP,BY: r6OTHFRWISE OBTAINING POSSES- SCALE: SHEET DWG. SION OF THEM WILL BE EX- PROJECT N0. NONE N0. 5 NO. D - 3230 REV. BY DATE =REVISION APP. DATE PRE3SLY WOTIFIED OF THEIR CONFIDENTIAL NATURE. ITEM LIST ITEM NO. FIBREBOND MANUFACTURER MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION ITEM NO. FIBREBOND MANUFACTURER MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION N0. PART N0. PART NO. PART NO. PART - - - - !li _ 1- _22634 22635 _ 02L2200 Q22200NS _ SQUARED _ _ _ _ _ _ 200 AMP 10 MAIN BREAKER DISCONNECT W_ ENCLOSURE_ - _ _ _ - _ __51- _10798_ _ _ _ _ _ 67T7KDBSTK626 BEST _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ DEADABO5T FIOO(EY OUT- -HU = - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _- 22371__ _ _ 2_ _21231�20765�20766 _NOOD_42L22_SjQOD_220_02MB_ SQUARf D 200 AMP 1m MAIN BREAKER PANELBOARD _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - _ _ __ �E �gTCH KEEPER __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ KOHLER_ _ _ _ _ _ _ AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - __53- 22371_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - 3_ _23551- - - - - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _-54- -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - NATIONAL GUARD - - __ 36 DOOR SWEEP -_ _- _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4_ _24132 352=24-LRP _ _ _ _ ALAN SCIENTIFIC _ _ SURGE ARRESTOR_ _ _ - - - - - - - - _ _ _ 5_ _ 1087210873_ _ 2E440jE444_ _ - - _ DAYTON_ -_ _ _ _ _ _ 4000 WATT HEATER_WjSURFACE MOUNT ENCLOSURE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __55- _12633_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ DOOR STOP - - - - - - - -- - _ _ 6- _23789_ _ _ _ _ _ LB24_OA _ _ _ _ _ _ __ LITHON/A _ _ _ _ __ _ 2_40W FLUORESCENT FIXTURES EOUIPMENT_ROOM�_ _ _ _ __5_6_ _ 11050_ _ _ __ _ 0382 _ _ - _ _ _- - KAS-N _ _ _ CHROME PULL HANDLE= = = = - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - __57_ 12450- _ _ _ _ _16AD-48 _ _ _ _ _ NATIONAL GUARD _ 48 DRIP STRIP _ 7_ _23789__ _ __ _ LB240A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ LIT_HONIA _ _ _ _ __ _ 2_40W_ FLUOR_ESCEN_7=FIXTURES GENERATOR R_00J_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - 8- _23974_ _ _ _ _ _ NR_G_8_06 - _ _ - -- HUBBELL - _ _ _ _ - _ 10GW HIGH PRESSURE SD_D1UM_FIXTURE WL PHOTO CELL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _5_8- _ 1 1802_ _ _ _ _ _16AD=54 _ _ _ __ _ NAT/ONAL GUAR _ _ _ 54n DR/P STRIP _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __59_ -12347_ - _ _ _ 198N_42- _ _ _ _ _ _ NA_T70N_AL GUARD _ _ 42 DOOR SWEEP _ _ _ _ g _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. - - - - - - - __60- 1070553621 - - - - _ _ ARROW HART _ - - - BLOCK HEATER DUPLEX RECEPTACLE/ 2- 3? 4- - - - _ - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - ' 70_ _17646_ _ _ _ __ 1500 SERIES _ _ _ _ _ AMWELD_ _ - _ _ -_ 3670 DOOR- _ - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - __6_1_ _23789_ _ _ _ _ LB240A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ LITHON_7A _ __ _ _ _ _ 2-40W FLUORESCENT FIXTURES STORAGE ROOM 1_1_ _ 11648__ _ _- - 1500 SE_R1ES _ _ _ _ _ AM_WELD3670 DOOR_ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - -- - - - __ _ EQUIPMENT R00_M_UGHT SmUM 4 ' X 4' J.B. 6 _ 10203_ _ _ - _ _ 52_71 _ _ _ - _ _ - - - _ - - _ - - - - _ STORAGE ROOM 1 (GHT SWITCH1 4 '_X_ _J.B. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 12_ _10203_ 5211 - - - - - - - - - - - r - -r - - - - - - - -- 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --63- -- - - - - EXTERIOR GfCI RECEP7ACLEj2" X 4� W15-_ JB 1310203 5211 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GENERATOR ROOM L_IG_HT SWITCH/ 4 X 4 J.B. - _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - _1_735173272__ 39-GYM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ADEMCO_ _ _ _ _ __ _ MAGNETIC DOORALARM_(EQ_UIPMENT ROOM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ 15- _ 1135_113272_ _ 39_-GYM _ __ _ _ __ AOEMC_O_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ MAGNETIC DOOR ALARM_�ENERATOR ROOM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __65-__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5T061_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GRAINGER_ - _ _ _ _ _ EYE 4�ASH STATION _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ - - -_ 6 4 _7�16'_X 4 17i76'"_J_B_ WZ_ EXTENDER RING - - _ _ - - 16- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - -- - EXTE_R- -QR_ GROUND BAR �4_ X 3 X_12 - - - - - - - - OMIZER - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FILE FOLDER - - - - - - - - = - - - -- - - - - - - - - - 17- _23134__ _ _ _ _ AVP36ACA05 Cll MARVAIR __ _ _ _ _ _ HVAC 1 =_3 TON_Wj5KW HEAT STRIP_& BUILT IN ECONOMIZER __67- _13867_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _23134_ _ _ - - - A_VP3_6ACA05_CII_ _ _ _ MAR_A/R_ _ - _ - - -_ HVAC_ 2 _3_ TON NVl5KW NEAT STRIP & BUILT IN ECONOMIZER _ _ _ _68- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6W758 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GRA/NGCR=_ _ _ _ = WOODEN 4B.�W/ EXTENDER RING _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 11 16 _X 4 1J16 J.B. FOR ALARMS _69_ __ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ W- 1 - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ __ _ _ 1960__ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ __ - - - - -- __70- 17053 7604 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DAYNORTONCOM CLOSER _ _ __2_0- _10705- - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - -- ARROW HART _ _ - - - QUAD._RECEPTACLLZ 4 -X 4T J.B. -- - - _ - - - - - - - - QUAD._R_ECEPTACL� 4 _X_ 4_ J.B. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - 71- _ 12964210925_ _ 3X740jX852 _ _ _ DAYTON_ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ COMMERCIAL POWER FAIL_RAK 6_X 6'rJ.B_ __ ARROW_ HART - - - - - - -- - - - - - _- - - _7 - - - - - - - - - _ _21- _ 10705_ _ _ _ _ _ 53621__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __72- _2_0- - --925_ _ 5X82_7jX852_ _ _ _ _ DAYTON_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ GE_NEL,-B. SHUTDOWN - - - 6 " X 6 J.B._ _ _ - _ - - _ - 22- -- - - - ENV/RONMEN_TAL_CONTROL_� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - 14- LB.-COND(IL[T_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - -- - - - - - --73- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - -- _ - _ ELECTO SIGNAL LAB_ _ SMGKE DE_TECTORL 4_ X 4_ J.B._� _ _ -- _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �2� - _ 23- _22405__ _ _ _ _ 320CX _ _ _ _ - - - - - - -- - - 74- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ L. PEN CONDUCE]_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _24- _24133__ - _ _ - 320CXH_ - _ - _ _ _- ELECT- SIGNAL LAB__ SM_- HEAT DeTEC- - _Low 4 -X 4_ J.B. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ 2_ PVC PENETRI TION --75- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - 25_ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ T- -� - - - - - - - - - - - - _76- _10705_ _ _ _ _ _ 53621_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ARROW HARP _ __ 20A CJUADPLEX RECEPTACLj4- X - J. _ - _ __ - - _ - _ - DAMPER MOTOR_D_ISCONNECJ 4 _X 4_ J.B. _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - 2rN_IPPLE CA - LCO ENTRY _ - _ 26- - 10203_ 5211 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - T , - _-27- _21pg9_ _ _ _ _ _ M436A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AIRSTREAM PRODUCTS 3' X 36' MOTORIZE_O INTAKE_DAMPER WL FILTER - _ _ __ _ - - - _ _ _ -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _28- -21099_ - _ _ - _ M4_36A_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ AIRSTREAM PRODUCTS 36 _X_ - - MOTORIZED EXHAUST DAMPER _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ -_ - _ _ - - - - - 2° NIPPLE W- CAPS SERVICE ENTRY _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - - --79- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - 29- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - 2r,-NEC LB _ _ --80- - _30- _ 12740 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 1184911736 _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ M- - - ECT _ - _- - 4'_ = 12 PORT COAX ENTRY PLATE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - --32- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HIDDEN BLOCKOUT __12 PORT COAX ENTRY PLATE - - - - - - -- - - - -82- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -83- -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - SECURl 57 SYSTE_M_CON7ROL PANEL_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _33_ _21117- - - - - - Z7100E- - - - - -- - MOOSE - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -34- - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ MOOSE - - - - - - - - KEY PAD FOR_SECURITY SYSTEM- - - - - - - - --- --B4-- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 35_ _10705 53621_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ ARROW HART _ _ __ _ TRANSFORMER PLUGGED INTO D_UPL'E- RECEPT- - - X 4 ' - - _ - __85_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _- _ - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - SIREN AND SIREA D_RNERL 4 X_4 J.B._ - _ _ - _-86- _ - - - - - - - - 22408722- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - MO_OSE - - - - - - - - R - - - - - - - - - - - 87- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37- - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 38 KOHLER _ 40 KW DIESEL GENERATOR W1_150 G--- - - - - WALL SKID TANK- - __88- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GENERATOR EXHAUST SYSTEM _ _ _ _ _ - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - rr - -4r -- - - -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - _ --40- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - 4 -X4- - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - � '- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - _9'1- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -4 - -- - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 93. 43. - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --94- -- - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -_ - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -44_ _ _ _ _ __ _ ___ _ _ __ _ _ __ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --95- --- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --45- -- - - - - - - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - --96- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - 5Z175GRAINGER__ _ _ __ _ INTERIOR MAT- - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -46- -- -- --97- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' 47- _11040_17041 __ 2A69_1 2A696_ _ _ _ _ 24_ PDLETE_RMINAL STRIP - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - --48- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 99, 49 22816 LOCK GUARD _ -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ __ _ _ _ - - - - 100 _- -- - - _ -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11073FBB191NPR1�26DSTANLEY 4 1L2 X 4 J2_ MINGE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ••O 16.7Qa III r Tip OF rrtgnennWltnM 4lm' p CONFIDENTIAL illl_ I 11996 BLDG. N0. d B 0 N D 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-377- 1030 THESE PIANS ARE THE CONFID- EN11AL PROPERTY AND CONTAIN DWN.BY: P. PEDROZA DATE: 2�29�96 BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE TRADE SECRETS OF FIBREBOND q THESECORPORATION. DRAWINGS ANY OR THE F CHK.BY: N `_� DATE: 3/!1/F,6 R x �] Fn! / �/�F F( INFORMATIONAINED /` � i '-8 " 4O'— " EQUPMEW SHELTER AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED ENG.BY: DATE: B\ FIBREBOND CORPORATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED THESE APP.BY' - DATE. �Jp ITEM LIST DFAWINGS HAVE BEEN DISTRIB- �IYI ILS UIED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING n /�/� OITHERWISEAT NOBTANINGIJ POSSES-G OR APP.BY. "T/"X' DALE: 31Q SCALE: SHEET 6 °N7. D - ,3230 SV1N OF THEM WILL BE EX- PROJECT NO. NONE No. REV. BYWDATEREVISION APP. DATE PFESSLY NOTIFIED OF THEIR CONFIDENTIAL NATURE. I 14 T.B.R. 1-AMP. FUSE 0 7 SMOKE VIC. CKT 1 8 2 / DETECTOR 14 NEU. 2 HVAC 2 VIO. 3 p g � S.A.R. L.L R._ T-STAT �2 � 2 8 0 EV 5 8 9 8 2 86 10 R SDAEN T.M L L.R. 2 6 1 iii Yl 4 6A TB. 4 7 i LLR.4 2 —0 Y2 CLOCK 7 3 0 6B 4 1F i U NEUTRAL L.L.R. 3 12 G 2 iii 17 9 7 TB. 9 8 go 8 TO. 14 9 3 TB. 15 8 9 i 10 SMOKE ALARM RELAY T.B.R. 2 11 SMOKE 1+ 6 TIMER CKT 14 DETECTOR 3 1 to 1 7 W DYPASS o7a2 - rOR VIOVIO. 3 912 HVAC ; 7 S.A.R. L.L.R. T-STAT f/1 13 A 13 8 4 7 1 6 4 1 5FIRE ALARM 15 Aq S.A.R. TWO UNITS 16 2 - - Y2 TBR g TO (47). RUNNING ALARM 17 L.L.R. i 7 1 L.L.R.4 4 �� 7 O CS TERMINATIONS HIGH TEMP. 18 NEUTRA ALARM 19 LOW TEMP. 20 L.L.R.6 ALARM 21 TB. 16 9 6 TB. 77 = TERMINAL BOARD CONNECTIONS TIMER BYPASS RELAY T.B.R. � — — Ll = RELAY BASE CONNECTIONS SEVEN 2 7 DAY SCHEMATIC CLOCK ERR.7 T.B.R. 1 DIAGRAM TB. 5 1 4 S.A.R. 1 TB. 70 T.B.R.8 T.B.R.2 6 B S.A.R.2 LEAD LAG RELAY L.L.R. I N L 7I EXTERIOR PANEL CONNECTIONS LMSAH21 T-STAT f1 TB. 4 NOTES'' _ R -- TB. 5 oUu�nmrorm. 76° Y7 TO, 6 1. CONTROL PANEL WIRING SHALL BE #18 AWG SOLID AND SHALL ��.req`:-REu c'��� BE COLOR CODED ACCORDING TO HVAC FUNCTION. A. 78 - Y2 TB. 6A 4,•'v i s 56 ° W TB- 68 TB. 13 2. HVAC WIRING TO TERMINAL STRIP CAN BE 5 CON./7-STAT CABLE. C TB. 7 .. : = TIMER BYPASS THERM05TAT J. SWITCHING CIRCUIT FROM SMOKE DETECTOR CAN BE #18 AWG. u�,,o •.ti s 5 J Q'y4 R WLIM-HI 4. ALL 120 VAC WIRING SHALL BE #12 AWG. %9?'•';0 T q 0.;10 , 5. ALARM WIRES SHALL BE 2 CONDUCTOR SHIELDED ALARM WIRE. 6. ALL WIRING TO CONTROL PANEL DOOR SHALL BE STRANDED. HIGH TEMP. ALARM LOW TEMP. ALARM LMSAN21 T-STAT #2 CONFIDENTIAL R T6. 10 0 TB. 18 0 TB. 20 760 Y7 TB. 11 HIGH LOW 1111 I 1 1996 78 ° Y2 TO. 17A TEMP. TEMP. 66 ° W TB. 11 B 85 B TB. 19 55' R TB. 21 G TO. 12 BLDG. NO.COLEMAN BARBER F I B ¶�y E B 0 T 7 D COLEMAN COLEMAN � 1111 \NI JIIIILI�'I 0 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-377- 1030 THESE PLAINS ARE THE CONFID- ENTIAL PRCDPERTY AND CONTAIN DWN.BY: P. PEDROZA DATE: 2129�96 BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE TRADE SECRETS OF FIBREBOND — THESE RATIION. ANY USE OF 1y#6 THESE DRAWINGS OR THE CHK.BY: �.� DATE: g INFI,RMATICJN CONTAINED HEREIN )_ Q �/ �� l_ EQUIPMEW SHH TER FOR ANY REASON OTHER THAN ENG.BY: DATE: U /1 AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED BY CIBREBfOND BITER THESE ISSTRICTLY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL DOOR DRAeUGSwHA HAVE DISTRIB- APP.BY: DATE:31�lg4 UTED WITHI THE UNDERSTANDING & l I VA li WIRING THAT ANYONE RECEIVING OR APP.II �Uf DATE: OTHERWISE: OBTAINING POSSES- SCALE: SHEET WG DWG PION of NOT D - 323 0 REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE NgOTI IR . IOH OF [HEM WILL BE EPROJECT No IED OF THEIR NONE CONFIDENTIAL NATURE. I ILII i I 39'-3 7116- [471 7/16" i 18" 10'-11 3/8" [131 318"] 3T 3 37" 37" � F0 O Mum 0 m m m m 0 N o I ELEVATION C ELEVATION B ELEVATION E 7 2 3 8 12 i I 6 9 40•_0" [480'1 C2 1 7 -- 2481116- 7 71/16 112 5/76" 711116- 1 9511116- 8" 15'" 10 1 i MATERIAL LIST - - - — NO REd DESCRIPTION PART 9 3 QETAIL 1 16 SPLICE CLAMP A-7589 2 8 BOLT 3017-2 1 DETAILAi SUPPORTING CABLE RACK/GRID 3 16 NUT 3014-6 FROM CEILING - N.T.S. CABLE RACK JUNCTION 4 16 CORNER CLAMP A-7592 0 NT.S 5 8 BOLT 3017-1 6 12 21" KINDORF CHANNEL B905 J� 7 24 518- - 11 THREADED ROD 8 24 SQUARE NUT - 5/8" 8914 9 24 SQUARE WASHER �v 10 24 BRACKET 3029-1 11 72 NUT 3014-8 12 58 TAPCON 13 5 18'" CABLE RACK 2003-21 4 5 3 14 15 4 2" X 2" X 1 4" ANGLE-18" LONG 16 16 8 J-BOLT "A" 17 8 LOCKWASHER 12 78 8 1 NU7T 13 19 8 1 WALL CLIP I [I rl r m 77 j CABLE RACK 15 16 4 5 NOTE 1. BOTTOM OF CABLE RACK TO BE 7'-6" A.F.F. CEILING VIEW 15 --_— 1 ggNWer7nnrprry 3 7 7 �O ARC rrrrrrr G WALL ' DETAIL k CABLE DETAIL FENTD NTOGWALL ANGLEK N.T.S. CONNECTING TWO CABLE RACKS BY "T"-JUNCTION -N.T.S CONFIDENTIAL .1111 I 11996 BLDG. NO. F ]II B R JE B 0 N 1 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 316-377-1030 THESE PLANS ARE THE CONFID- C O O TRADE PROPERTY AND CONTAIN DWN.BY: P. PEDROZA DATE: 2129196 BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE _ TRADE SECRETS OF FIBREBOND 8 E CORPORATION. ANY USE OF CHK.BY: J . 7 DATE: INFORMATHO D THESE DRAN CO OR THE A FOR ANY I REASON TOTHER THAN AINED N —8 X 40 -0 EQUIPMENT SHELTER ENG.BY: DATE: ' I AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED ELEVAAON KEY BY STRICBIRE PROD IBITEDRRH,ICN ESE IS DAT :3j� NDRAWINGS HAVE BEEN DISTRIB- APP.BY / A Q L E QA C / UTED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ANYONE RECEIVING OR APP.BY: Owl DATE o OTHERWISE EW WILL POSSES- SCALE; SNEOEi 8 °No D - 3230 SION OF THEW WILL BE EX- PROJECT NO. REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE PRESSL( NOTIFIED OF THEIR J/B"=!0 CONFIDENTIAL NATURE 1s 3 ZONE 1 N.C. • COM. 1 35 O_ Ri - CRAY DOOR CONTACTS CLOSED 2 34 LLL..ddd0- / F T1 - BROWN WHEN DOOR /S SECURE ZONE 2 N.C. COM. LL`L\ �� 14 3 33 � R - RED ZONE 3 N'C. N.0.1. 4 32 �L�L11JJ— T - GREEN _ 5 ZONE 4 NC' N.O. � p'� 6 31 l / 1 +12V SMK POWER ZONE 5 N.C. N.O. 7 ❑ 30 �LL7YLLY-IIJJJ� +12V FIRE POWER CUSTOMER 8 29 f / ) — +12V AUX. POWER CONNECTED ZONE 6 N'C' N.O. eC4 �?3 9 28 NEGATIVE ❑ LLLYY iLLll ZONE 7 N.C. N.O. 70 ZONE B NN.O. 1 C, 27 K2 (+) TRIGGER 72 76K2 - NORMALLY CLOSED INTRUSION ALARM 0LLLLL��L...JJ��p-� 70 BLDG. ALARM 73 25 LTJ K2 COMMON TERMINAL STRIP. i 74 L���1111JJJJ 24 K2 NORMALLY OPEN Z100R 4 15 CONTROL STATION �7^��� 3 76 23 I / Z - K1 (+) TRIGGER 2 77 O 22 �L�7L-1�J— K7 - NORMALLY CLOSED 779 18 27 �(.1J1 / F- K1 COMMON G� AUTHORIZED ENTRY 79 70 BLDG. ALARM 20 I / 1- K1 NORMALLY OPEN 1ERMlNAL STRIP. TRANSFORMER �1J 18 UAC 35VA ON7 � a OFF EARTH IL GROUND MSIR. POWER SW. J 16 — OUT7STATUS °JDS — 100 0 ° 1 +12V'AUX. D) EARTH ( ) GROUND . 2 NEGATIVE (BLACK) _ y O 3 ACCESS OITE) + S 0 4 LAMP OUT ) S O 5 PRE-ALAR (BROWN) P O 6 BURGULARUTPUT (BLUE) qK O 7 VIOLATIONORANGE) E D Q 8ARMED OUTPUT (YELLOW) R O 9 MEDICAL/AUX. 2 (PURPLE) O �gvusuuutrrnmr,,�� O 10 POLICE/AUX. 1 (GRAY) ^p6D ARc - O 11 FIRE OUTPUT (PINK) �` ° `.S Q 12 BURGULAR OUTPUT (TAN) ^, •,a^.o hr�� CbNFIDUNMAL II II I 11996 BLDG. NO. 1L �I B R �Il_J B 0 1 �1 T D 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-377- 1030 THESEPtAWS ARE THE CONFID- ENTIAL '6BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE TRADE SECRIERTY AND CONTAIN DWN.BY: P. PEDROZ< DATE:ECRIETS OF FIBREBOND THESECORPRAW/I . ANY USE OF ! ,J 3Jy/96 THESE DRAWIINGS OR THE CHK.BY: I/` DATE: INF°RMAT' CONTAINED HEREINRE FOR ANY RE=ASON OTHER THAN ENG.BY: DATE: 11 X 40 '-0 EQUIPMENT SHELTER AS E+PRESSSLY AUTHORIZED BY FIBREBONND CORPORATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. THESE APP.BY: DATE:�gN, MOOSE SECURITY SYSTEM DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN DISTRIB- UTED WITH ]THE UNDERSTANDING' THAT ANYONE RECEIVING OR APP.BY: 0,^/� DATE: ,� YL OTHERWISE (OBTAINING POSSES- SCALE: SNo? 9 °NO. D - 3230 SIGN OF THIEM WILL BE EX- PROJECT N0. REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE PRESSLY NOTIFIED OF THEIR NONE CONFIDENTIAL NATURE. III 39'-3 7116- [471 7/16" 39"-3 7/76" [471 7116'7------ 248 /16'] _—__248 1 16" 1/2" PVC STRAIGHT 1/2" FVC STRAIGHT SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 1 1/2" PVC STRAIGHT SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 � SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 2 THROUGH WALL THROUGH WALL SEE NOTE 2 !o THROUGH WALL — — — — — — — — ----SEF_ NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 1 —1 SEE 6 NOTE 2 er4SEE 3O39 TO RDAMPER �4O O BRAIDED GROUNDGROUNDTO o GENERATOR FRAME SEE NOTE 7 SEE NOTE SEE NOTE 4'• 4• Sff NOTE SEE NOTE SEE NOTE 4 3 AND 4 3 AND 4 3 AND 4 3 AND 43 AND 4 ELEVATION A ELEVATION C 10'-1735" (1313b] f0'-1735" (13136) 10'-7 NS" [13735] _ SEE NOTE Y SEE NOTE i SEE NOTE 7 b Ro � � To CABLE RACK GROUND 2 18 TO DAMPER e _______40'—D" (480"I h � 2481116- _ 717111- _ 112 5/16" 7 17/16" 95 17/76" FIEI,O WORK SEE NOTE 7 13 37 3 ' ? SEE NOTE 5 SEE NOTE 5LYZZIZA 2 -- I 16 GROUND TO / GROUND TOJ � 2 ELEVATION B ELEVATION D ELEVATION E ABLE RACK CABLE RACK SEE NOTE 1 , SEE NOTE 1 io� S£� E NOTE 1 — I GROUND TO S f CABLE RACK (CABLENRAC�1 \ � 10 1O 17 SEE NOTE 5 SEE NOTE 5 GREEN INSULATED COPPER STRANDED WIRE (MAIN) CEILING VIIEW III 1 8" MINIMUM WIRE RETAINER IMt TYPICAL O 18" C/C FASTENERS AS REQUIRED ELEVATION F ELEVATION G ELEVATION H NOTES: GREEN INSULATED COPPER ')A STRANDED WIRE (MAIN) COMPRESSION TERMIN 1. INTERIOR HALO GROUND AND INTERIOR DROPS ARE 1 8" MINIMUM WIRE RETAINER TYPICAL AS REQUIRoCi ���+++t.TO BE #2 GREEN INSULATED STRANDED COPPER W �����ED ARCo,, WIRE 4 MAXIM TYPICAL 0 18" CIC GREEN INSULATED COPPER FASTENERS AS CIC STRANDED WIRE (TAP) 2, ALL CONNECTIONS TO INTERIOR HALO GROUND AND DROPS ARE TO BE MADE WITH DOUBLE CRIMP C-TAPS. ' 3 DRILL 1/2" PVC PENETRATIONS THROUGH WALL AT �ry 45' T (DOWN AND OUT). COMPRESSION TERMINAL "A �NE.4 TYPICAL AS REQUIRED �� E5 NUT, 9017, LOCKWASHER, 4. USE #2 SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE THROUGH WALL. R� P* GREEN IINSULATED COPPER & FLATWASHERS AS REQUIRED CRIMP TO INTERIOR DROP AND CADWfLD TO FRAME P�� STRANDED WIRE (TAP) ON EXTERIOR, 5. DRILL 1/2" PVC PENETRATION THROUGH PARTITION COMPRESSION LUG - WALL FOR ROOM TO ROOM CONNECTION. COPPER BAR OR 6. USE PANDUIT WIRE RETAINERS TO CONNECT HALO METAL ENCLOSURE CONFIDENTIAL GROUND WIRE TO WALL (APPROX. 2'-0" D.C.). TYPICAL HALO GROUND 7. BOND TO MAIN BREAKER DISCONNECT WITH IP2 GREEN C701L AND TIE BI-DIRECTIONAL DROP DETAIL .pIl- I 11996 INSULATED STRANDED COPPER WIRE C—TAP AT CORNER AIDDITIONAL WIRE DROP sALe N.T.S. BLDG, N0. 8 BOND ALL CABLE TRAY, BOXES, GRILLES, DOOR TO HALO GROUND AS USE gF2 GREEN FRAMES, ANDAINSULATED STRANDED COPPER MPERS SHOWN. FI B � E B ® N D 2 HOLE LUGS, AND C-TAPS. _4 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-377-1030 THESE PLAINS APE THE CONFID— ENTAIL AND CONTAIN DWN.BY: P. PEDROZA DATE: 2129196 TRADE BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE TRADE SECRETS OF NBREBOND — CORPORATION. ANY USE OF CHK.BY: ) I THESE DRAIWINGS OR THE /� �.J DATE: yd C '© EREIN FOF' ANYINFORAREASONTOITHERHTHAN 1 I +—U /� 40'-0 EQUIPMENT SHELTER B � AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED ENG.BY: DATE �E N D BY FIBREBIOND CORPORATION IS A TYPICAL HALO GRQUND ST�1C��V RROHIBITEO THESE APpay• - t� pA1[? a��l� HALO GROUND DRAWINGS HAVE BEEIJ DISTRIB— , )� 1 ELEYATIl.IIJ KEY GROUND CORNER DETAIL UTED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING - SCALE. N.T.S. THAT ANYONE RECEIVING OR APP.BY: (/,;� �"� DATE: ® PP 3/20/96 REV, HG ;PROP DET.; REMOVED EXTRA C—TAPS FROM DROPS TAI Z 2a y 6 gTIT WISOF 4HOBT ILL ININGBEPOE SES— __ SCALE: SHEET DWG. REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE PRESSLY wonFIED of THEIR PROJECT No. J�6^_Ip No. 0 — No. D - 3230 CONFIDENTIAL NATURE 40'-0" 480" 248Ne" 71Ne" 110le" 71Ne" 95rNe" 39'-3 7/16" [471 7/16'7 3 3 18" SEE NOTE 3 SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 -�` 39 'i 2 ^ �JIJIJV V1.Jl.JIJ O 2 III ` SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE i 38 I TO GROUND DROP 17 �� SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 li i ELEVATION C 10 10 11 (INTERIOR) CEILING VIEW I 40'-6" [486"] 40'-0" [480"] 3 FIELD WORK 3 FIELD WORK i FIELD WORK — O = 10 I 10 I I 8 i7 O Fli EXTERIOR GROUND BAR E __= y SEE NOTE 6 === __= O Y d O I I O Y 0 0 I I O SEE NOTE 4 SEE NOTE 4 I I SEE NOTE 4 SEE NOTE 4 ° I I I I l- SEE NOTE 4 SEE NOTE 4 i SEE f ° f -'-- SEE NOTE NOTE 8 i 8 ELEVATION C ELEVATION A (EXTERIOR) NO �FS: 7. BOND ALL SECTIONS OF CABLE TRAY. USE 12 GREEN INSULATED STRANDED COPPER WIRE AND 2 HOLE GROUND LUGS. REMOVE 12" PAINT BENEATH LUG AT ALL CONNECTIONS. 74 - 7/16" HOLES GLASTIC 2 BOND CABLE TRAY TO GROUND RING AT 4 PLACES. USE r{'2 2" 8" 2" 3/8" DIA. BOLTS 7 4" INSULATOR GREEN INSULATED STRANDED COPPER WIRE WITH 2 HOLE GROUND LUGS AT CABLE TRAY AND DOUBLE CRIMP C-TAP AT GROUND RING. 3. BOND GENERATOR FRAME TO INTERIOR GROUND DROP. USE #2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ = Pz'-; � l+''Sj.•S GREEN INSULATED STRANDED COPPER WIRE O o O o 0 O t '=?r'^T^ •{c 4. USE #2 SOLID TINNED COPPER WIRE THROUGH WALL TO CONNECT FLOOR FRAME TO INTERIOR DROPS. CADWELD TO FLOOR FRAME AND 1" 5 SPACES ® 2" 1" ]/8" THICK USE DOUBLE CRIMP C—TAP TO CONNECT TO INTERIOR DROP. 1" WIDE STRAPa.+.._^r?4'....� CADWELD DROPS +nnnwewi+''" 5. COIL 8'-0" OF ADDITIONAL WIRE FOR FUTURE USE. (USE CADWELD EXTERIOR GROUND BAR (SEE NOTE 6) MOLD WC—IT) 6. PROVIDE DROPS FROM EXTERIOR GROUND BAR. USE #2 SOLID TINNED MOUNT �ITALLY BENE/+TH COPPER WIRE AND COIL 16'-0". CONNECT TO GROUND BAR WITH COAAXX EENNTRY PLATE CADWELD CONNECTION. CONFIDENTI PL 7 CONNECT INTERIOR GROUND BAR TO GROUND BAR IN A.C. PANELBOARO AND INTERIOR GROUND DROP. USE f2 GREEN INSULATED STRANDED COPPER WIRE I I 11996 RS TO FLOOR FRAME. USE 2 BARE TINNED SOLID 8. BOND AIR CONDITIONERS r� COPPER WIRE 2 HOLE LUG AND CADWELD KIT, BLDG. NO. �T 11L' I B R E B 1V 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-377- 1030 THESE PLANJS ARE THE CONFID- ENTIAL RT( AND CONTAIN OWN.BY: P. PEDROZDATE: 2129196 TRADE SECRETS OF FIBREBOND BELL ATLANTIC TLAnTI/ V /NE v VOL3ILc C CORPORATION ESE DRAVNINGS OR THE THESE CHK.BY: �� DATE: ll '-8" qqr Q B O G F INFORMATION) CONTAINED HEREINFOR ANY REASON OTHER THAN I l —U X 40 '-0 EQUIPMENT SHELTER H D AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED q BY FIBREBOND CORPORATION IS ENG.BY: DATE: � l 1 STRICTLY PROHIBITEDTHESE APP.BY: DATE: ?jI`l�(o GROUNDING DETAIL j ELEVATION Icer DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN DISTRIB- UTED WITH THE UNDERSTANOING n THAT AN)ONE RECEIVING OR APP.BY: N A DATE: 3 . SCIE: SET DWG. OTHERWISE OBTAINING POSSES— SION OF THEM WILL BE EX— PROJECT N0. N0. D - 3230 REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE PRELSLY NOTIFIED OF THEIR J/8 �� CONFIDENTII4L NATURE•,_� �� _,,,,_,__•__,,,_„� _�,__ 4'-0" C OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING 10" X 10" X 1" PLATE o 2- 712" DIA � � BEARING PLATE TYP. ANCHORS (SEE DETAIL BELOW) 3 ' CLEAR PIER OR CAISSON (SEE NOTE) 6" X 6" X 10GA. W. W.F. I I I 2'-6" DIA. I CAISSON (TOP VIEW „A„ I „A„ 1 1/2" I= l '-0" 4' CAISSON 10" X 10" X I" PLATE Ir (SEE BEARING PLATE DETAIL) SUB–GRADE (SEE SITE FOR FIN. GR, EL.) J L I STONE CONC. CAISSON (3,000 PSI CONC. STRENGTH 8 28 DAYS AIR ENTRAINED 49 TO 69) 120" 120" 120" 120" 6" X 6" X 10GA. WELDED WIRE FABRIC 40'-0" TOP TO BOTTOM 11 '-8" X 30'-0" MODULAR BUILDING - FOUNDATION PLAN 4'-0" 1/2" = 1 '-O° UNDISTURBED SOIL – 50/L BEARING ASSUMED TO BE 4,000 PSF TO BE l '-6" `. CONFIRMED BY SITE INVESTIGATION. OUTSIDE FACE OF BUILDING 1 '-6" DIA. PIER 2'-6" DIA. #3 TIES O 70"' WELDED ANCHORS RASE PLATE 6' G17,4WEL COURSE CL PIER 2- 1/2" DIA. SECTION "A-A" (ALTERNATE, 'v ANCHORS (SEE" ;5LT'E PLAN FOR 4 - #5 45' ON. G17ADE ELEV) 1 1/2" = 1 '-0" SUB-GRADE ! 1 1/2" CLEAR �b '— PIER :!'i, SECTION "B-8" „ 93,� A/ „ 1/2" = 1 '-0" NOTE: PIER PIER FOUNDATIONS SHALL BE REPLACED WITH CAISSO 10" X 10" X 1" PLATE WHEN NECESSARY, AND BY THE DIRECTION OF THE SITE " •�r Oe p, .J '•.'tJ' h (SEE BEARING PLATE DETAIL) ENGINEER. SPACING FOR THE CAISSONS WILL BE THE .,°nay`. =t r SAME AS THE SPACING FOR THE PIER FOUNDATIONS, <•; pr w d :` jj/ SUB-GRADE (SEE SITE SECTION "C-C" UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE SITE ENGINEER. #3 TIES @ 10" PLAN FOR FIN. GR. EL.) 1 112" = 1 '-0" 10" X 10", 1" PLATE 4" 1/4 CONFIDfP��T!-�11. f— DEPTH VARIES TO MEET ^B" '"B" LOCAL BUILDING CODESilll 1 1 1996 1/4 E BLDG. NO. — 1/2" DIA, ANCHOR IIS 2 REQ'D. I B R �-j N B 0 D � �L 1 6 4 @ 9" GDNG. PIER 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 7'1055 318-377- 1030 THESE PLANIS ARE THE CONFID- //�� T LANTIC NYNE EACH WAY U ENTIAL PROPERTY AND CONTAIN DWN.BY: P. PEDROZA DATE: 2129196 BELL /1 / X MOBILE TRADE SECRETS OF FIBREDOND ` 4'-G' CORPORATION. ANY USE OF CHK.II (�L. f DATE: BEARING PLATE DETAIL THESE ORANI CO AI THE INF° ANY KHAT'°E CONTAINED THER THAN '' 11 '-8 X 40 '-0 EQUIPMENT SHELTER " ' r AREXPRESSLY°UT°HORIZEDHAN ENG.BY: DATE: SECTION "A-A' 1 P�2 = 1 '-D" BY FIBREBOIND CORPORATION IS 112 — V-0" DRAIWINGSPHA EIBITED. THESE BEEN DISTRIB- APP.BY: DATE: 3I II FOUNDATION PLAN UTED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT ANYONE RECEIVING OR APP.BY: Q� DATE: � � OTHERWISE OBTAINING POSSES- SCALE: SHEET I DWG. D - 32,30 SION OF THIEM WILL BE EX- PROJECT NO. NO. 1 NO. REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE PRESSLY NOTIFIED of THEIR NOTED CONFIDENTIAL NATURE i SII FIBRECRETE SKIN �." FIBRECRETE SKIN ' 7/2"" 0 HORIZONTAL� EXTERIOR OF ROOF REINFORCING BAR //2" p VERTICAL i/R"�INF REINFORCING BAR F-42 3 13/16" 5 15/16" 00 5 75/16" 3 13/16' REINFORCING 84R EN ORCING BAR r 7 2" 0 VERTICAI — CASTING BED SPLICES STAGGERED CASTING BED CASTING BED / ;1 MIN. SPLICE LENGTH 18" _ REINFORCING BAI / CA 57 BED REBAR 1n — FIBRECRETE SKIN 3 3/76" 3 75/16" 3 75/76" 3 3/76° REBAR SPLICING » SECTION "BB" SECTION "CC" SECTION "D._D" DETAIL TYPICAL SECTION "A -A NTS NTS. N.T.S N.TS \ ° N ;i " 9Y2" a1 01 CN "i 7 CQ 7112 36" 36" 36" 36" 36` 36 36 36 36 36 G" - - --- \ - ---� - - D - - ---- - - - y - - 36 36 - 137 112" ° o o n 137 7/2" D 'tn TYPICAL 4 PLACES N I o.( 4Y 27 CAL PILAC17S 93 1/2" 0 93 1/2" - O 7/2"o RE-BAR ^, b1 N c 49 7/2" 49 7/2 tl cp " 4" 1/2" 2" 36 "2" 36 2' 36 I 2" 36" 2' 36" 2' 36 2" 36„ 2'" 36" S" - -36 - - - 2" 36"- -- 2" 27%2„ 4" v r, 70" 14" 4" � 1 1 1 96 1 1 16' 4' 76" 4" 16" 4" 76" 4' B 16" _ 4" 16„ ,!„ 16 �1 78„ 4" - o o ° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ o — 0 0 0 ° I, d. /z» 9V22 40 40" 38' 38' - — - 38' — - - 38 38' 38 ---- - -3b -- 36 - - -- -- - --- 401, 40 cl r. O ch F� Ivi cn r tl 00 N N N "7 "1 1' .�:rVugNs d- d A 40'-3" [483"] ROOF = CONFIDENTIAL i ` ' '> � "• ;?.•• 'o ,,,� 1UI- I 11996 BLDG. NO. 111 IB IIIA IJ B 0 N D 1300 Davenporl, Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-377- 1030 - - NOTES: C 1 . ALL REBAR GRADE 60 TYPICAL - - _- 1HE' � SECREPIALISTS ARF IFI DOFID- EN11 ,L PROIPERIY AND CONTAIN DWN BY,S. CGU/t DATE:03,74�,96 BELL /_� „ /� /� ,, / �,, /� \ / MOBILE,,O B/� r fRAI ` sr_c1RErs OF FIHREDoraD - LL /v /v /v x lul L F H COR 'ORALION. ANY USE OF CHK 8Y: DATE:s�/3��G 2. DIAGONAL DIMENSION - 503 3/4" THEE IJRA'WINGS OR 1"` - -- _- . 11 8 Y 40' --- ) EQUIPMENT SHELTER E NFOW(FIQN1 CONTAINED IIER.EN _ FOR ANY REASON OTHER THAN EHG.BY: DATE: AS I XPRES SLY AUTHORI7LD _ /� Y DY IHRLDUND CORPORN ICfI IS APP DY: DATE: �j l F?UC TURAL LA I OUT SWIILY "ROIIIDITED, IIIFSE _ DRA MIGS HAVE DEEII I11511?19 ROOF r�J -- SI011 AN Ol'IFfs ECFIVI ;TANI)IfdO ------- - - -- - '--- ' ` OO/ LIT[ I WIII I THE II __- IIIA, API'f01NC RE TI1n I'u3 OR APP,BY: �„� DATE: 3/,j�� E L���T � � KEY 01H R F 1 ODT,4I fdlf n; TUSSIS _ _ _ SCALE: SHEET c % DWG. �J I?I- + PROJECT NO. / _ N0. S I NO. D — �G �O REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE PRE lFLY 11011F IF J of 1111 IR Jj4" I'-0° COPT IDEFMAL NAIUHI . ��—•�,� Ili STRUCTURAL �- i" FIBRECRETE MITER CORNERS CONCRETE ANCHOR I" FIBRECRETE I-BEAM SA IN i" X 45• TYP. SKIN . } STRUCTURAL FOAM ANGLE FOAM I" FIBRECRE7E FOAM FOA I " FIBRECRETE SKIN SKIN SECTION "A -A" SECTION "B-B" NTS. NTS Vic\ CJ CN c\j CN OD 8" 38" 38„ 38" 38' - - 41 42712" - - - - /i„ G2„ 24 1 2" 24 7 2" 53" =Q ' - N II II II II II �� II II II � II II ____� II II — - -- -- - -- _ - - - - __ - II II II II II ' II II ;� II II II II II II II II II II II II I NO II II II II II II II II II � II II II 37 I p 37 CO II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II 6 4" 41s° 3%a" 36" 344 36 344 363/x" 3 36 ! -3 J14 36 3J/" 3 `14" 3%4" 36" - 344 3Ei' -- - ;6: 5 ' ja ' -3C-- - 3 --36" 3Y " 74J 4" o ! ' 70" N O 70" � II II II II � II � II II II � II II � II II ' I � II II II II II �, II A II II A II II II II II � II II II II II II II II II II II nj II II II II -- - — - = — = — =-Il - — II II II II II II II II II II II 103" 703_ I I @ II IR II II II II II II I II II 'I "' II II II II II II II II � II II II III � II II II II II II II II !I II II II � II II II II II II II II 136„ 736" II � II II II II II II II II II II II o O O lhhldlO O @ ® p p O O O O 11 N 2„ 8„ 38„ 38 40" 40° 38" 38„ 38^ 38" -- 40", C (N cV 40'-0" [480"] FLOOR sR h•.�4 CONFIOENTIA" '��a,e,n��n,em�"do II II I 11996 BLDG. N0. IL F h � II B IP B 0 N D jNOTES. 1300 Davenport, Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-377-1030 7 . TYPICAL 6" STEEL FLOOR; HI SE PLANS ARE TFI .IROND C - EN IAL PROPERTY AN[) CONTAIN DWN.BY:S, COOK DATE:0,374/96 JFL I ATLANTIC q � /� �� MOBILE F H TR/DL SEc'Ras or- Finar_Norlu 13ELL I l L l v l /v C /v lul Lt SEE DETAIL SHEET CO Sl DR IOrI ANY' PSL OF CHK BY: DFlTE:3/,319 — - ._ 1HI SI ATkOrq NCS N II II E 2. DIAGONAL DIMENSION 500" W1ATF RE SONO,W H1R�III -- - - 1I ' X10'-0 CQUIPMLNT SHELTER Eol � nNY REAsorl o�llrR nlnr+ ENCeY: DATE: AS EXPRLS"SLY AUIIIORIIEU BY FIEIRELIDND COhruRA,lorl IS J� STRUCTURAL LAYOUT -- STI ICIL'i PR01-IIHIfFIi. IIICSC AP P.BY: DATE: 3/)3 9L /� DR ,WINGS HAVE BI E H DISIRII7 - FLOOR ---- UTI D WIII I THE UMAR' fWIDING Tli I AN"OFIE RECEIVINV UIP APP.BY: �� DATE: 31,7(_ O' IERWISIC OBTAINING PbSSI_; ___ _ _ _ _ SCAEE: SHEET �7 DWG. ELEVATION �� -- - SI( 'J OF NWI VID HE FX- PROJECT IJ O. NO- 5L N0. rRcv. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE PRssTY rIOPEIFD of IHFIIt J�4"=1'-0° CC'�I.II=IDENIIAL NAIURL I tell 2*114' REINFORCING 8" 0 VERTICAL INTERIOR CONTROL JOINT—\ 16' INTERIOR OF PANEL SCH 40 PVC 1 1/4" t BAR FIBRECRETE SKIN roAM INSULATION F-42 CAST 9 45' SPLICES STAGGERED MIN. SPLICE LENGTH 783 8' 0 HORIZONTALFIBRECRETE SKIN / CA571NG BED REINFORCING B.AR FIBRECRETE SKIN '3/8" 0 HORIZONTALF7BRECRETE SKIN ,REINFORCING BAR REBAR BACKER ROD cAULKSEAM3/8" 0 VERTICALREINFORCING BAR ROCK SLURRY5 16" AGGREGATEpC��7' ROCK SLUFIBRECRETE SKIN REBAR SPLICING ROCK SLURRY FIBRECRETE SKIN DETAIL — TYPICAL SECTION "C-C" GROUNDING PENETRATION DETAIL NT.S. SECTION "B-B" N.T.S. NTS SECTION "A-A" N.T.S. N.T.S. ro an N h. ° N N8„ d 38' 4038" 38" 38' 34' 40" — --40 37 - - / — - - - - - - -- 40 — 38' -- 38--- - -- — REBA 3 -- -- -- ' - „ N C R 93 5/8" C C I c C 36 _ II 66 7/8 `O `N' 3070 DOOR FRAME\ / \ 3070 ODOR FRAME I 3670 DOOR FRAME 4 3/4" OUT T4 3/4" OUR F OUT O OUT RH SWING 66 7/8" - 4 3/4" OUT TO OUT RH SWING - - _ 04 r� LH SWING co) N HINGE _ 40 7/8" N HINGE SIDE A HINGE SIDE 40 7/8' SIDE - " --- ---- --- 2" 24" 4" 4" 181V16" 2' 36" 2 „ 36" 3I " 2" 36" 2" 1815/x ' 4 4„ 24" 4, — 4„ 36" 2„ 33' � 4" 12�" 4' 45/s " 45/s" 4�4" =� - 771 °j B 1/2" SCH 40 PVC I 41 7/8° 7 -- CAST @ 45" 3 REQ'D. 759 7/8" 24 1/2" 24 1/2" 42' S838 ' - - _ 38" —_ " 3 7/8„ 4 1 - — 35 1/2" 29 1/2" �3 - - — - - - - zzo 62" ro ro °j a\ r \ \ N " LnM 11)O co N N p r ,anmuuwuft.yr-_ 39'-3 3/4" [471 3/4°1 „A„ j CONFIDENTIAL SIDE PANEL onAOy',°� yT:.........• s+ �o: .N BLDG. NO. - D_. ��pJ ,IL�' ,IL � E 111 " 0 N -- 300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-377- 1030 NOTES: _-- IIF SE PIANS AR IHT CONI°- - - BELL ATLANTIC WNEX MOBILE - 1 rJTInE FROPERrr nwF, cornnlrl DwN.BYS. COOK OnrE:03/4/96 7 . OND TYPICAL 4" PANEL; SEE DETAIL SHEET = _ RADE SEIION. OF S RED .01?POIRFlIION. ANY I15L Of F -IIESE DRAWINGS OR, 111E CHK.BY: DATE: 3/3 yy _--��-. �r 2. SIDE PANEL CAST AGGF?EGATE SIDE DOWN NFORVAAIION GONIAINED EIEREIN - 77 '-8 X 40 - 0 CG1UIPMENT SHELIG D OR AtNY REASON OTHER THAN ENG.BY:- DATE: E J. ALL REBAR GRADE 60 TYPICAL AS FIRi RE59LY A'ORPO"`F° S I RUCTURAL I_AYD„UT BY `I D3REf30PlD CORPORATION IS - A — - STRICTLY PR01-I PI 1- THISE APP.BY: DATE: �J 13 SIDE I rl C hn n/L L A 4. DIAGONAL DIMENSION 483 3/4” - WED 'WITH HAVE PI 1-11 STAF1'SNDD- - - I _ J L THAI 'WITH EIF MVIN9dTANDING - � DATE:Y/Yl DWG. _ OIAL (MISE C RF CEIVIN6 OR App BY: 12J T SCALE: SHEET 7 OTHER' F ILM WIIIr,G POSSES- _ _ -_ D - 3230 SIGN (OF 111LM WIIL BC tX- PROJECT N0. �/4°_1�_�" N0. �� NO.' REVISION APP. DATE PRES`DCY NOT1EIrD Or THEIR L LEUA I � O N KEY REV. BY DATE CONFIIDENIIAL NAWHIL CAL OR SCH 40 F0RECRETE SKIN REINFORCING HORIZONTAL FIBRECRETE4 SKIN*114" REINFORCING 21BAR INTERIBRECRETE SKIN INT 3Y6 FOAM INSULATION rBLOCKOUT INTERIOR OZ PANEL FACA®!NG BEDSPLICES STICE LENGTDH 181. 3/8"" 0 HORIZONTAL FIBRECRETE SKIN 3/8" o VERTICAL REINFORCING BAR ?�cREINFORCING BAR CAULK SEAM AGGREGATE NO AGGREGATEROCK SLURRY 5 16"' 12"I. 2" THIS AREA TYPICAL AGGREGATE ROCK SLURRY FIBRECRETE SKIN ROCK SLUFIBRECRETE SKIN BACKER ROD 'F"�` REBAR SPLICING "8-B" SECTION "C-C" SECTION "D-D" GROUNDING PENETRATION DERAIL DETAIL - TYPICAL SECTION SECTION "A -A" N.T.S. N.T.S. NTS N.TS N.TS N.T.S. 1 00 co CIO \ N T QNS- QD 38" 38" '38" -- --3� " 38 40" 40" 3 7/8" 40 40 38 38" - -- - - - - - 220 - - — - - 50 5/8" 20" 318"o REBAAR ; 93 5/8" 93518'j � I �n 20Yz" 20/z' 11 4 I iou- D NCN A 66 7/8„ C (C D / D 43 66 7/8' C C 7 15 /76" C C 177 15/16" /e - EY2 4° 74�" 2° 362" 36" 2" 36" 2362" 36 2" 20 �" 2" 29" 2' 36" 2" 2' 2711 36" 2" 21?%s '" 2 - "z N I A 36 3/4„ \ - 2„ 40 7/8" 40 7/8" - lv D 6,. --- 110" co ]51i1s " ill N 4�s" � 2%a" 36" CN ji 2" PVC MR1 F7T J " 5/R4/GH/ THRU 1/2" SCH 40 PVC RCl]'l7. CAST @ 45' 3 REQ'D. 3 7/8" 38" 38° 40° 40,„ 38" 38" 38" 38" O" 40" 38" 38 39'-,3 3/4" [471 314"] - -- - -- - - --- - SIDE PANEL » C" "e0 ARrti or I - CON-F�DEN`IAL Jill I 11996 BLDG.NNO. _ -`0-�T - IIIA �Il B 1L F� I� B 0 1 �I D NOTES: — 130,I0C Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 31B-377- 1030 NOTES: NESE_ r, rls nHE AND ONIAI -- - --- c 1 . TYPICAL 4" PANEL; SEE DETAIL SHEET INTIM IPRO FTS F F RERONh, DWN.9Y:S COOK DATE:03�4/96 BELL ATLANTIC NYNCX MOBILE 1RFlDF SECRETS OF FIE1hFBOND F ( ORPOAAIION ANY 1151- OF CHK.6Y: DATE: 2 SIDE PANEL CAST AGGREGATE SIDE DOWN r I�L SEFOR DRAWINGS OR 'I '1 3IT3 p� B _ I OR ANY RE SOPJTO I7 HEREIN - -- - 1 �8 x 40 '=0 EQUIPMENT SHEL TER E 3. ALL REBAR GRADE 60 TYPICAL - — ISR ANY REASON IORIR rHAN ENGAY: DATE: 5 F✓BREB ND Aur' I<,RIAFD STRUCTURAL LAS OUT A Y FIH�•JEBODID GORPORnrIOPI IS - — — 4. DIAGONAL DIMENSION — 483 3/4" RAWIN IRICTLY PHAIr BlI I1IE5F APF.6Y: °ATE: ,3 IEI) 11 AVE er Erl 1ANI)H SIDE DC PAl V EL C - ntD Nrnld lnE urlDu,srnrlDlNc _- -- -IAl ANYONE REGI IVIHG OR APP,EY: DATE:.3�3��(� "I >I I-IERNF I ENI AIGItIG POSSES _--_ SCALE: SHEET S /1 ONO. D — 3230 ELEVATION KEY ,IDN (,F JIFF, N,II_ I,1 EY PROJECT No. - - — - J�4°-, o° J '1 REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE "OMIDE Ilam-IID R rHFIR arrnDENIIn� NnIURE. i III it *114" REINFORCING /8" 0 VERTICAL 1 i/4"' f BAR FOAM INSULATION 2" 8• TAPERED ALL TAPERED ALL 14" 2'" FOAM INSULATION 28" TARPERED ALL FIBRECRETE SKIN*FTBRECRETE "" 0 HORIZONTAL � AROUND AROUNDA OUND FORCING BAR FIBRECRETE SKIN SPLICES STAGGERED 3/8'" 0 HORIZONTAL CASTING BED CASTING BED . =4STING BED MIN. SPLICE LENGTH 18REINFORCING BAR3/8" 0 VERTICALFREINFORCING BAR REBAR ROCK SLUFIBRECRETE SKIN 3 8" 3 B"" 3 8" 3 8"" 3/8"" 3/8"" ROCK SLURRY SKIN REBAR SPLICING SECTION "A—A" SECTION B—B SECTION C—C SECTION "D—D" SECTION "E—E" DETAIL TYPICAL N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. NTS N TS If N,TS. ' rn I 4 44 14" 44' 44 44„ 44„ 44» i g X18" 93 5/8" 93 5/8„ 93 5/8" N N - -- -- -- N Ln - — � 4, 37Ws - 36'� �d 3G ' 2„ — -21 X48 4„ 'A- N- Lo / - -- Lo " D c N 66 7/8" 28" 28 66 7/8" 66 7/8" o -- 66 7/8 D D o — — — o � E E I \ � N N A _ its ' I � II 40 1 8' D D 40 1/8" �0 40 1/8" / \ 40 1/8" / o A o- o / �\ d -- 363n 2" q 54" 0 32 54" N " q CN 3/8"o 2 B 2" 2„ B d 2» 33 33 33" 33" 33" 33" 4' N oI o c, 11 '-8° (140'1 1 '- 8" [ 140 --- END PANEL "B" END PANEL "D" „etna,am�un�q�n i I i i Tiw �•;o 'r �; — T � '= yF o "'E ���,� ; CONFIDENTIAL BLDG. NO. N0 TES: - F JAI I� IR E IB 0 N ID - 1 . TYPICAL 4" PANELS; SEE DETAIL SHEET .iOD Da enF)°ri. Dri Minden, Louisiana 71056 316-377- 1030 --- E CE SFC,PEIRI ( AM) CONTAIN DWN.BY:S Uh)k( DATE:0�4�96 C rl-I' SF_ PL RETS 2. END PANELS CAST AGGREGATE SIDE DOWN °PER,Y "' BELL ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBLE TH SI DR IIHREBOI'JD - - -- - -- - -- - - E PJ TR ?POR DRAWIONINGS ANY 1151 M / 1A - - —_-- �� g D J. ALL REBAR GRADE 60 TYPICAL _ _ _- AWIN°S DHK.BY DATE: 3 ,39 r0OANY RE 90NTAIUIER TV,111 I '-8 Y 40 '--0 EQUIPMENT SHELTCR 4. DIAGONAL DIMENSION - 76 3 7 6" AS ANY REAS A °TITER lI ENG.BY: DATE: 1 AS EYBREBOLY A°II-O; ; IO - STRUCTURAL LAYOUT DR D wlrrHoraD cGI?I=i;Rmlold Is — - _ — - BY II[3RE _ ST'I'ICrIY PROHIRIIFI) IIIESE �� / » ,WINGS HAVE BFEI1 I)ISIRn- APP.BY: DATE: 3 3 ENO Il-1 �A F I�I l-7 D» uI � IHF uHUIRSIAHDINe - - — f IVO -)ANELS U CX T101 AIVYCNE RECHOIFIG OR APP.BY: loll/ DATE:01I /pCa ELEVATION � �� SI( N F T OBTAINING; POSSES - _ SCALE: SHEET DWG. �7 5¢'N OF NICM WILL f31 FN- PROJECT N0. N0. S5 N0. D - 13230 REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE CCNFIDE rIAL N D °r II-u_IR J/4"=1' �' cG.vFIDEraIIAL rdnruRc - Iilp 5/8" NUT RECESSED PENETRATION LOCK WASHER 3 1/2" FLAT WASHER GROUT 3 dd d° a FOAM INSULATION d = RESISTANCE _ a d I O I WEL,) d 4 ° d ° d — ° ' 3/4" 0 THREAD FERRULE 1/2" ADHESIVE BEAD TYPICAL 262" 0 L.C. WIRE 1/8„ X 1/2„ (4100 MIN. TENSILE STRENGTH) GRADE 5 - 5/8" SEAM STRIP ,/ ALLTHREADF-42 CONCRETE F-- 42 CONCRETE ANCHOR i ANCHOR ' - SPRAY ON POLYURETHANE144 (SEAM SEALER) SCALE: FULL WALLAGGREGATE I FOAM INSULATIONCONCRETE SKINCONCRETE SKIN TYPICAL ROOF TO WALL JOINT DETAIL FOAM SCALE: 112"= l" 1 CONCRETE SKIN 2 CONCRETE SKIN 1 .1--� EXTERIOR PANEL 1/8" HOLE - DRILLED AT 45' TYPICAL ALL FOAM SECTION VENT HOLE PLUGGED AFTER CASING d VENT HOLE DRILLED AFTER CASTING FOAM INSULATION ° AGGREGATE WALL d 1/4" CLEAR TUBING F-42 CONCRETE SPRAY ON POLYURETHANE ANCHOR (SEAM SEALER) 1/8' X 1/2" FLOOR CONCRETE SKIN 1/2" ADHESIVE a° SEAM STRIP BEAD TYPICAL TYPICAL VENT DETAIL 7 44 d d a N. T.S. FLAT WASHER LOCK WASHER FLOOR °Q 6" X 4" X 3/8" d ° d . d 5/8" GRADE 5 - BOLT 1/8" HOLES ^ 2;, (SEE FLOOR SLEEVE SENT DETAIL 1) CONCRETE SKIN FOAM INSULATION TYPICAL FLOOR TO IIII WALL JOINT DETAIL SCALE: 1/2"= 1" 1/4" HOLES 1/4" VENT ALL SIDES CONCRETE SKIN CONCRETE SKIN (SEE VENT DETAIL 1) f\1111itlll llliffl// S`lSf p,tD Ari+C,y qi SPRAY ON POLYURETHANEa END PANEL (SEAM SEALER) ° TYPICAL TYPI CAL PANEL : ro; VENT SYSTEM '- � ° ,4 coNFi�F.��+ � - - I FOAM INSULATION AGGREGATE � SIDE PANEL y • e ,: o �'''riF ° N. T S. ynuxxxna\I\ CONCRETE SKIN 1/2" ADHESIVE 1/8" STRIP FOR RECESSED 7U� 0 11996 BEAD TYPICAL CORNER POST FLAT WASHER BLDG. NO.. ° d GROUT �� � �' ° GRADE 5 - 5/8"' BOLT - - 1111 II B R ,IL�J 111- 0 1 � D N 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 '318-377-1030 TI IC 3E PITONS ARL TI IE SONFID- . ° N TOP)E SECRETS OF IICIHRFORJONIDr DWN.BY:i - COOK DATE:9,J14196 H r/ / A T/ A �, /TIC ^ „ /^ E MOBILE CO[ PORAL IION. ANY' USC OF HILL L L l v /v �/v THI ;E DRAWINGS OR Ilii CHK.BY: Q DATE: 3�$ 96 1/8 X 1/2 INF' )RMATIUN CONTAINIO HEREIN -- --- - q , CONCRETE SKIN SEAM STRIP LOCK WASHER — - g y 4� -� EQU�PMENT SHELT�R Tu PIM 'REASON OTHER THP.P1 \ AS EXPRESSLY AILIHURILED ENG.DY: DATE: FIBRE AGGREGATE TYPICAL END PANEL TO DR WlFIGS HAVE CBEEF] ISTRI I- APP.BY: DATE: 313/% STI ICTLY PROFIIHI IF D. II-ILSE MISC. DETAILS OR ,WINGS HAVE BEEN DISIRIB- SIDE PANEL JOINT DETAIL - IJT D WAIF ,HE RECEIVING ANDI11G .R � / /�(. 1H ,I ANTONE RECCIVING OR APP.BY: /� DATE: 313 01I ERWISC ODTAINIFIG PUSSI SCALE: SHEET DWG. SCALE: 1 2"= 1" ----- - SICN OF IFIFM WILL TE c+- -PROJECT - - S6 D — �2�0 / PP. SSLY NOnFIFD 0� IIIUI2 PPo�ECT No. NOTED No. No. REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE cwFlDEnIrIAL NAIURL 40'-0" 480"] o rn o o0 0 N �n 20 1/4" 39 3/4" 39 3/4" 40 1/2" 39 3/4" 39 3/4' 40 1/2" 39 3/4" 39 3/4" 40 1/2" - - 3.9 3,1/4" O O O O O O O O O �v @ J{19287 J/79058 {{ ,i7 ��2 , 91 36 REQ'D. 60 REQ'D. — — = 1 ( l(J'i 1. #192793 II II II 1 REO'D. II II II II I II II II II II II II II II II II II F @ II 2 REQ'D. II II II II II II II II II II II 11 1 #192795 b II 5 REQ'D. III II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II n II II II II II II II II x/792194 11 REQ'D. II II III II II II 94° 94" II II II II II II II II II II II II � II II II II II II II II II II II II o #19904 II II II II II II II II 2 REQ'D. 63EQ'DII R . II II II II II (/79295 II122192 REQ D, II II II II II II O II II II II 6 REQ'D. II II II D II II II O O O O O O Ud OIh I ii I III iO O O lh 1111p p 0- (c 7t �z 561, 8" 172" 8" 112" 8„ - - — - i 72 -- -- --- -- 8.. �v - — --- -- FLOOR ASSEMBLY #73382 #12191 #19295 114` 714" J 473382 #73382 #192194 ,14.� #19905 1 4 2,. #19295 t + NO TES: N 114 " Din rr sy,ry:A. 118„ 7 . TYPICAL 6" STEEL FLOOR; / SEE DETAIL SHEET �4„ #79905 1,4., ,4. #,92,42 .. #79995 1/4" ,/4 .` tw.p. . 2. DIAGONAL DIMENSION - 500" SECTION "A -A" SECTION "e-e" SECTION "C-C" ' .........�y > - .... o :' SECTION „ -- hmn FLOOR ASSEMBLY PART #192190 IUo_ i 11996 11'-8" X 40'-0" X 6" BLDG. N0. PART NO. NO, REO'D. DESCRIPTION RAW MATERIAL LENGTH T, 192191 1 FLOOR ANGLE 6" X 4" X 3/8" ANGLE 480" _fll� 192192 1 FLOOR ANGLE 6" X 4" X 3/8" ANGLE 480" 1300 Davenport Drive Minden, Louisiana 71055 318-377- 1030 C 19904 2 FLOOR ANGLE 6" X 4" X 3/8" ANGLE 139 1/4" THESE PLANS ARE THE CONnn- ENTIAL PROPERPr AND I ONIFAIN DwN.BY:S. COOK DATE:03/4/96 44 F H 19905 12 FLOOR BEAM S6 X 12.+5#/FT. BEAM 139 1/4" _ TRADE SECRETS OF FIHr?l_DOrIn - -- _. BE/ L ATLANTIC NYNEX MOBILE CORPOi;ATION ANY USE Or D 192193 1 FLOOR BEAM S6 X 12.:5#/FT. BEAM 40 1/8" THESE DRAwIwcS OF 1111 CHK BY: DATE: _ #� / INFORN0NON ICONIAINED HEREIII - - -- 40' 0 EQUIPMENT SHELTER E G 192194 11 FLOOR BEAM S6 X 12.5 FT BEAM 39 3 8" — FOR MIY REA50N OWER WAN E11G.BY: DATE: A 192195 5 FLOOR BEAM S6 X 12.5#/FT BEAM 19 11/16" AS ExI REssl r nui HOR7ro 7 //�'� - 19058 60 CONCRETE ANCHOR 1/2" HOT ROLLED ROUND 2 1/2" _ - Rr IPEBelaD CORPORAW)'I s - {{ {'^ �-/- J STRUC ����� � LAYOUT " APP.6Y:_ _ -_ _DATE: )/7(� rL UV l \ /-1 S S CMBL Y -- STRICTIY PRCIIHIBIFED MTV 19281 36 FLOOR SLEEVE 2" EMT CONDUIT 5 9/16 DRAWIfIM HAVE THE BEEN )ISFRIR _ " " — - UIED �VIIH TIIC UNDF RSI nN DII'I(, ' 19295 16 GUSSET PLATE 3/8X 2 FLAT BAR 6 1/8" THAI ANYorn_ Rra-caNc OR App.By. DATE: 31131 ELEVATION KEY / ° / ' - OTIIER VISE 0NrAI 'ING Pc SSTs - - - 13382 16 COUPLING NUT 3 4 X 2 1 4 ' SCALE: SHEET DwG. — PION ( P NOTIFIED WILI HE f_k - PROJECT NO. NO. %C NO. 0 — ,3230 REV. 6Y DATE REVISION APP. DATE PREssIE NAL NAT ix Iln ue J/4"=1'-0° coNrll ENnAL NnruP,F. 11 INSFALL h ?[ RAILD BA17EN 11150LATION BETWEEN ME71L STUDS \ 1/2" SHEETROCK 1/2" SHEETROCK 1 \ 1 1 1 Y,\ \ 3/4" AC PLYWOOD \ i \, PAINTED BLACK \ /\ \ FRP \ l / l ` ',/ \ 11" ' EQUIPMENT ROOM ' l l GENERA TOR ROOM /, . • moi � SIDE PANEL "A" i rn 1/2" PLYWOOD - 1/2" PI YwooD ,I o WALL SECTION "A -A " N.T.S. I I - - i''0" -- 99 1/2" FINISHED - -- WALL I � [ 76" 16" 76" 16" 76 16" 16" EQUIPMENT SHELTER GENERATOR ROOM 10'- 11 3/8" 131 3/8" PARTITION WALL 2 REQUIRED LOCATION OF PARTITION WALL N.T.S. \`1p111111RIB/yral ,p UD qqC, .. y� CONFIDENTIALj CF•µEQ "``�� /rIpIIMwill 1 it fl I 11996 I BLDG. NO. 1C3 R E B O N D - 1300 Daverrporl Drive Minden, Louisiana 71.055 318-377- 1030 C --- THESF PLANS ARE ]HE cUN1ID - F H TRADE L PROPERTY F F I PI750NIIJ DwN.BY:S. COOK DATE:03,/q/96 n r/ / ATLANTIC 1 T1 n n TI n / NL X ^ nO I L- TRADr_ sErREts of r113r�rporJD / LJLLL /1 / L /1/ V l� IV 1 / V /� lV/ LJ L CORPORATION.. ANY USE (�F CHK..BY:- DATE: 3//3`9F THESE DRAWINGS OR TIT !!! -8 X 40 -0 EQUIPMENT SHELTER INFORN'ATIGN CONTAINED HER FIfJ - -TfI -- FOR AI1Y REASON OTHER 1IR0M I EIJG.BY - _ DATE: _ As EXI RESSLY AUTIiORI/I--U - ST FIB IFPROI 131TUDnI SE IS Ink PARTITION WALL - DRAWINGS Y PHA UNITED MESE gpp,BY: DA1E:'j j3 UTED I IIHI HE BEEN SIS1RIB- — - � - UTFD "lIIH THE UPIUE RSI AfJDII,IG -- V /� O V �� _ THAT / VYOI'JC RECEN P OR APP.BY: D�� - DATE: LL— SIO FR',F T OBTAINING POSSCS - SCALE: SHEET DWG. SIGN ( P TI-ICM WIU_ BE PROJECT N0. C Q REV. BY DATE REVISION APP. DATE PRESS' Y NON ILL) OI )HEIIe "=1'-0" NG• J CJ NG. O — �2�0 CONFIDENTIAL NAFURC.