HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-35.-4-7.6T~TLD¥
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
August 5, 1986
Patricia Moore
Edson and Bruer
Attorneys at Law
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Site Plan for
Robert Wissmann
Dear Mrs. Moore:
Please let this confirm the following action taken by the
Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, August 4, 1986.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve
the site plan for Robert Wissmann for construction of a single
family dwelling located at Gull Pond Lane, Greenport, survey
dated as revised July 21, 1986, subject to :
Surveys indicating the following
-driveway
-septic system
-finished floor elevation
- bulkhead
site plan elements:
Upon receipt of the above, the Chairman will endorse the surveys.
Please contact this office if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT OanOWSZI, Ja., ~H~ikMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
March 31, 1986
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
Mrs. Patricia C. Moore
Legal Assistant
Edson & Bruer, Attorneys
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Charlotte & Robert Wissman
Gull Pond Lane, Greenport, NY 11944
Dear Mrs. Moore:
Please be advised that the Board of Trustees took the
following action regarding the'above captioned matter at
their regular meeting held on March 27, 1986.
Moved by Trustee Bredemeyer seconded by Trustee Goubeaud it was
RESOLVED that Robert & Charlotte Wissman be and hereby are granted
a Waiver of the Wetland Ordinance for the construction of a single
family residence on property located on Gull Pond Lane, Greenport.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate
calling this office at the telephone number listed above.
Very truly yours,
Henry P. Smith, President
Board of Town Trustees
Ilene Pfifferling
Clerk to Board
HPS: ip
Attachment
cc: Bldg. Dept.
Z .B.A.
Trustees
File
Southold Town Board of Appeals
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRtGONIS, JR.
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
ROBERT J. DOUGLASS
JOSEPH H. SAWlCK{ Notice of
July 17, 1986
S.E.Q.R.A.
NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION
Determination of Non-Significance
APPEAL NO.: 3527
PROJECT NAME: ROBERT AND' CHARLOTTE WISSMAN
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing
regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental
Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local
Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold.
This board determines the within project not to have a signifi-
cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated
bellow.
Please take further notice that this declaration should not be
considered a determination made for any other department or agency
which may also have an application pending for the same or similar
project.
TYPE OF ACTION: [X] Type II [ ] Unlisted [ ]
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Locate new dwelli~ng with reduced: (1) side-
yards, (2) frontyard, (.3) rearyard, (4) setback from highwater.
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more
particularly known as: 715 Gull Pond Lane, Greenpo~t, NY
1000-35-04-007.6
.REASON(S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION:
(1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been
submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects to
the environment are likely to occur should this project be imple-
mented as planned;
(2) Tke relief requested is a setback variance regulated as
provided in Section 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review
Act, 6 NYCRR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Linda KowalsRi, Secretary,
Southold Town Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Southold, NY 11971; tel. 516-
765-1809 or 1802.
Copies of this notice sent to the applicant or his agent and posted
on the Town Clerk Bulletin Board.
BRUER AND LARK
RUDOLPH H. E~RU£R
RICHARD F. LARK
WILLIAM D. MOORE
July 23,
1986
Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
ATT: Gerard Goehringer, Chairman
RE: Wissmann
Dear Mr. Goehringer:
At your request, Mr. Wissmann obtained measurements of the
distances from the various structures to the high water mark or
bulkhead on those parcels created by the Zoning Board in 1975 of
which Mr. Wissmann's parcel is one.
The parcel to the north of Mr. Wissmann's, which is owned by
the Spitzenberger's, is 42' 06" from the dwelling to the
bulkhead. The Wissmann piece, as proposed, would be 45' from the
dwelling to the bulkhead. The adjoining parcel to the south has
a structure on it which is 47' from the structure to the bulkhead.
The most southerly piece has a structure which is 36' 6" from the
bulkhead. The average distance from the structure to the bulk-
head on these four parcels is 42.75' with Mr. and Mrs. Wissmann's
proposed dwelling to be 45' from the bulkhead. We respectfully
request that you grant the variances requested by Mr. and Mrs.
Wissmann.
Very truly yours,
WDM/skf
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Wissmann
William D. Moore
~1~ ~ ~'~ '~-"'~ %"'" ...... t'-~'''':' .... t ........... ' .... '~ --t,,*, '" t ~ F"IReoI Property /ax Service Agency ~m I
._.... ~ ............ :t ........... e ---- ~ . . --- . ....
~ ~ t,~,.d ~ " .... ~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~,.~ SOUTH~D ~ct,~_~
....... ' ........... ' .............. ~ ................... -- .......... b: ,,~ , 035
~ULL L.
Southold Town Board of Appeals
APPEALS BOARD
MEMBERS
July 17, 1986
S.E.Q.R.A.
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN
CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.
SERGE DOYEN, JR.
ROSERTJ. DOUG~ASS NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION
JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
APPEAL NO.: 3527
PROJECT NAME: ROBERT AND CHARLOTTE WI'SSMAN
This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing
regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the N.Y.S. Environmental
Quality Review Act of the Environmental Conservation Law and Local
Law #44-4 of the Town of Southold.
This board determines the within project not to have a signifi-
cant adverse effect on the environment for the reasons indicated
begow.
Please take further notice that this declaration should not be
considered a determination made for any other department or agency
which may also have an application pending for the same or similar
project.
TYPE OF ACTION: [X] Type II [ ] Unlisted [ ]
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Locate new dwelli, ng with reduced: (1) side-
yards, (2) frontyard, (.3) rearyard, (4~ setback from highwater.
LOCATION OF PROJECT: Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, more
particularly known as: 715 Gull Pond Lane, Greenpo~t, NY
1000-35-04-007.6
.REASON(S) SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION:
(1) An Environmental Assessment in the short form has been
submitted which indicates that no signific'ant adverse effects to
the environment are likely to occur should this project be imple-
mented as planned;
(2) Tke relief requested is a setback variance regulated as
provided in Section 617.13 of the State Environmental Quality Review
Act, 6 NYCRR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Linda KowalsRi, Secretary,
Southold Town Board of Appeals, Town Hall, Southold, NY 11971; tel. 516-
765-1809 or 1802.
Copies of this notice sent to the applicant or his agent and posted
on the Town Clerk Bulletin Board.
Southold Town Board o£Appeals
F4AIN I~nAD- BTATE I~nAD 25 ¢~I3UTH{3LD, L.I., N.Y.
TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Appeal No.
Application
TO:
3476
'Dated February 27? 1986 (Public Hearing
Mrs. Patricia C. Moore
Law Offices of Rudolph H.
Attorneys for ROBERT AND
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Bruer
CHARLOTTE WISSMAN
4/3/86)
[Appellant (s) ]
At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on Ma_~_28, 1986,
the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken
on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property
New York Town Law, Section 280-a
[ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance
Article , Section
[×] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance
Article , Section
[ ] Request for
Application of ROBERI ;.ND CHARLOTTE WISSMAN for a Variance to
the Zoning Ordinance, Art~c-f~q-~-~]~ Section 100-121 to se£k relief from
conditions placed by prior Appeal No. 2006 in the Name of Claire Brody
and Others dated February 27, 1985, which conditionally granted use of
lot for mooring, dock and storage building (Article III, Secticn 100-30-
(B)[9]) and insufficient lot area and width (Bulk Schedule), to allow
the construction of a single-family residence. Location of Propert3:
715 Gull Pond Lane, Greenport, NY; County Tax Map No. 1000-35-04-007.6
(referred to as Lot "C").
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on April 3,
1986, in the Matter of the Application of ROBERT AND CHARLOTTE WISSMAN,
under Appeal No. 3476; and
WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are
familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the
surrounding areas; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard
were heard and their testimony recorded and transcribed; and
WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and
documentation submitted concerning this application; and
WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact:
1. The premises in question is located along the east side
of Gull Pond Lane distant 637.82 feet from the southeasterly side of
Middle (North) Road, in the Hamlet of Greenport, and is identified
on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 35, Block
04, Lot 007.6.
2. The subject premises consists of a total area of 17,934
(CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO)
DATED: June 3,
Form ZB4 (rev.
1986.
12/?
CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD
OF APPEALS
Page 2 - Appeal ~o. 3476
Matter of ROBERT AND CHARLOTTE WISSMAN
Decision Rendered May 28, 1986
sq. ft. with frontage along Gull Pond Lane 140 feet, more cr less,
and lot depth of 170 feet. The premises is presently vacant and
constructed along the most easterly (rear) property line is a
bulkhead of 100 feet, more or less, in lergth.
3. By this application, appellants request relief from
prior Appeal ~o. 2006, Condition No. 1, rendered February 27,
1975 for approval of this substandard parcel for residential
use.
4. On February 6, 1975, predecessors in title (Claire
Brody and Others) applied for a Variance to thc. Zonin~ Ordinance,
for approval of four substandard lots, each containing a~pr(,ximately
21,000± square feet in area and insufficient lot width of 140± feet,
requiring a Variance from Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule,
which required a minimum lct size of 40,000 sq. ft. and 150 ft. lot
width. Also requested was permission to dock not more than two boats
other than their own as permitted by 2rticle III, Section lO0-~O(B)[9].
5. Article III, Section lO0-SO(B)[9] of the Zoning Code
provided as follows:
...B. Uses permitted by Special Exception by the
Board of Appeals. The following uses are permitted
as a special exception by the Board of Appeals, as
hereinafter provided, and subject to site plan
approval by the Planning Board ... (9) Boat docking
facilities for the docking~ mooring or accommcdation
of noncommercial boats, subject to the following
requirements: (a) There shall be docking or mooring
facilities for no more than two boats other than those
owned and used by the owner of the premises for his
personal ~se ....
6. In rendering a decision on February 27, 1975, the Board
of Appeals approved the insufficient lot area of proposed Lots A,
B, C, and D as shown by sketched survey (surveyed January 15, 1970).
Each lot on the 1/15/70 survey is shown to be bordering at its
easterly (rear) property line along the edge of a dredged canal
(without bulkheading). It is the understanding of this board that
during 1974-1975, the applicants were not able to obtain approval
from the Suffolk County Health Department for the proposed
subdivision or for the construction of new dwellings. The Board
of Appeals placed the following conditions in its Febru-
ary 27, 1975 decision:
(1) written covenants restricting or prohibiting
this property for residential use, without approYal
of the Board of Appeals, shall be filed in the
Suffolk County Clerk's Office;
(2) That before applicant may be permitted
dockage and mooring privileges for small boats
as an accesscry use, a special exception shall
be applied for from the Board of Appeals;
(3) Site plar~ ap~roval shall be obtained from
the Planning Board;
(4) Any sanitary facilities installed on this
property shall be subject to the approval of the
Board of Health;
· Page 3 Appeal No. 3476
Matter of ROBERT AND CHARLOTTE
Decision Rendered May 28, 1986
WISSMAN
(5) That this approval shall be subject to
applicant obtaining proper documents from the
State and County Environmental Control Commissions ....
7. For the record, it is noted that written Covenants
were executed by the predecessors in title dated November 28,
1978 declaring the four lots will not be used for residential
purposes, binding successors and assigns in title.
8. It is also noted for the record that: (a) the parcel
immediately south (Lot B) of the subject premises (Lot C) received
site plan approval from the Town Planning Board 1/9/79 as
required by prior Applications, Special Exception No. 2032
[Harold Stetler] dated May 1, 1975, and Variance No. 1954 [Drody
and Others] dated February 27, 1975; (b) on 9/23/80, Board of
Appeals' actions taken between the period from l/l/71 through
9/5/79 concerning lot line changes or subdivisions of lands, were
granted by the Planning Board; (c) the subject parcel, Lot C,
was issued a Certificate of Occupancy dated June 15, 1984, No. Z-
12559 indicating its status as a '~single and separate lot" from
the Building Inspector, and received Suffolk County Health
Department approval on 1/6/84, No. 14-S0-01; (d) the parcel
immediately north referred to as Lot D, was improved with a
single-family dwelling as per Certificate of Occupancy #Z-13071
dated December 18, 1984, and received Suffolk County Health
Department approval on zNovember 26, 1984, #12-S0-13.
9. In reviewing the surveys/sketches submitted under
this application, it is the position of the town that once a
complete application has been submitted to the Building
Department for a construction permit, additional reviews will
be made and an additional variance application may be necessary
(100-119.2) as well as compliance with the Floodplain Management
Law (Ch. 46) for a minimum elevation of the lowest floor at eight
feet above mean sea level for this "A-7" Flood Zone.
In considering this appeal, the board find and determines
that the relief requested should be approved as applied since:
(a) the circumstances are unique; (b) the practical difficulty
claimed is sufficient to warrant a granting of the variance;
(c) the history of this parcel and actions taken lend to the
practical difficulties of the appellants; (d) the interests
of justice will best be served by allowing the relief, as
conditionally noted below.
Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by
Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED, to grant relief as requested under Appeal
No. 3476 in the Matter of the Application of ROBERT AND CHAR-
LOTTE WISSMAN for approval of the subject 17,934~ sq. ft.
lot for single-family dwelling purposes, SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. That the new construction must comply with front
and side yard setback requirements without reductions;
2. Docking and mooring shall be limited to noncommercial
boats and for not more than two boats other than those owned and
used by the owner of the premises for his personal use (Article
III, Section 100-30(B)[9]);
Page 4 - Appeal No. 3476
Matter of ROBERT AND CHARLOTTE WISSMAN
Decision Rendered May 28, 1986
3. Commercial marina use shall not be permitted;
4. Additional variance applications must be applied for
concerning setback from bulkhead, etc. if they are deemed necessary
under the zoning regulations;
5. There shall be a minimum elevation of eight feet (8')
above mean sea level as required in this "A-7" Flood Zone;
6. No temporary living quarters (such as camper, trailer,
etc. unless permitted by Town Board , etc.).
Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis,
Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was duly adopted.
lk
~ P. GOEHRINGER, C~ffAIRMAN
June 3, 1986
Town Clerk, Town of Southold
February 26, 1986
986
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Wissman, Robert and Charlotte
Premises: Gull Pond La., Greenport, N.Y.
Dear Sirs:
This office represents Robert and Charlotte Wissman who wish to apply
to the Planning Board for site plan approval, pursuant to Appeal Nos.
1954 and 2006, paragraph %3 (copies attached hereto).
We submit herewith copies of site plan (sheet 2 of 3 and 3 of 3) as
well as survey dated 12/9/80, made by Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. We
have, on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Wissman, simultaneously submitted an
appeal to the Southold Town Zoning Board for that board's determin-
ation of the conditions placed on this property.
Please place this matter on your calendar, at the earliest convenient
date, for the board's review.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Patricia C. Moore
Legal Assistant
TOWN OF $OUTUOLD, N~W YOKK
ACTION OF THE ZONI~G 'BOARD OF APPEALS
&~?.~~ Dated February 6, 1975
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To Regt~lald Hudson a/c Cl&i~e B~ody & Others
136 Front Street
Gruenport, New York
DATE ~ebo....2~, 197'.
Appellant
at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on FeDl'll~ry 27 ·
was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your
( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property
( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance
(~) R~quest for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance
( )
1975 the appeal
1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be
granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section .................... Subsection ................... paragraph
.................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed ( )
confirmed because 10:05 P.M. (g.D.S.T.) upon application of Reginald Hudson
ale Claire Brody & Otheras 136 Front Street, Greenport, New York for a
variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, A~ttcle III, Section
100-30 B - 9 and Bulk Schedule for permission to use lot for mooring
dock and storage building with insufficient width and a~ea. Location
of property: E/S Gull Pond Lane, G~eenport, New York, (north center lot)
bounded on the Norths N. 66® 01s 20~ E. 170s ~ East 14~--~long
Canal~ ~outh S. 66® 01~ 20" W. 170' -+~ West N. 68~ 19~ 00' W.
and N. 61~ 29~ 10~ W. 48.76~ &long E/S Gull Pond Lane. Fee paid $15.
2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that
(a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce
hardship because
practical difficulties
(b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties
alike In the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because
(c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would)
change the character of the district because
(would not)
~nd therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted (
that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed.
SEE
) be denied and
FORM ZB4
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
/ .....
B ty ~evllle, Secretary Pro Tom
Soutbold Town Board of Appeals
~ild~g wi~ insufficl~t width a~ ~ on ~ ~ sma o~ ~11
Pond ~e, ~een~rt, New York. T~ fl~S O~ ~ ~ ~ ~t
applic~t is ~he ~er o~ ~T 'C' as ~ ~ Van ~l'a ~y dat~
J~y 15, 1970 and t~t ~ ~i ,~b~antiallF ~ ~ll or
~1 ~ size ~ ot~ lots in ~ ~lvi~I a~ ~t ~ ~rd
of Heal~ ~ Pla~lng ~ard ~ve ~t~t~ ~t ~s lo2 Is ~
sul~le for residential use. ~v~, It ~ t~ ~liqatton of the
~ard of ~ls ~ ~tt ~e a~llmt ~ use his ~y for
the most reaso~le use ~er t~ Z~q ~e w~oh, ~ ~o
ca~, is aocess~ use ~ ~e o~ reo~t~l ~.
The Board finds that strict application of the Or~inam~e
would pro~u~e practical diffficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardshi~ created is unique and woul~ not be shared byall
properties alike in the in~nediate vicinity of this property
and in the sa~.,e use district; and the variance will not change
the character of the neighborhood, a~d will observe the spirit
of the Ordinance.
. ' Re tnAld Hud /
'Avd~~ g ~ SOn a.c ~.~iu ·rosy
others, 136 ~ront ~eet, ~e~ ~ ~'~'
............
s~ a~as applied for iz~ accordance wi~ appll~nt's
and ~d'~'a~ described in the
au~~~~.~.
(~u~oy of Van Tuyl dated January 15,
2. That before the applicant ~ay be per~Ltted dockage and
mooring privileges for small boats as an accessory use ·
special exception shall be applied for £r~ the Board of
Appeals.
I. te plan approval shall be obtained fr~ the Planning
4. Any sanitary facilities inet&lied ca this property
shall be subje=t to the approv&l of t~ l~ard of Health.
~. Ti~t this approval shall be sub,eot to applicant obtaining
pro,er documents from the SUAta and County Env~onmental
Control Co~m£asions.
Vote of the Board~ Ayes~- Xassra~ GillispAa, Gzigo~As,
Hulse, Doyen.
, $
TO~N OF SOUTHOLD, NEW yORK
ACTION OF THE ZONIJqG BOARD OF APPEALS
Dated Februa~ 6, 1975
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTBOLD
To Saglnmld Hudson a/o Claire atomy & Others
156 Front Slareet
Gr~nport, Ne~ Yozk
DATE =F-,b..2:;., 1975
Appellant
at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on lPeb~S~ 27 · 197.~
was considered and the action indicated below was t~ken on your
( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property
( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance
(X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance
( )
the appeal
1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By resolution of the Board it was determined that a special exception ( ) be
granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section ............ ; ....... Subsection .................... paragraph
.................... of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector ( ) be reversed (
confirmed because 9145 ~.M* (~*S*T*] ]~T~/lq, ~M~ ~)J~:].i~&tlOn O~
ReginalA ~u~ &/c Claire Bro~y i Otb_rs, 136 Front Street, Oreenport,
New York ~Or · variance ~ ac~o. ~dam~e with the $oninq Ordinance,
l~'tial· 111~ Seot~o~ 100-30 S-J a~d Bulk Schedule for l:~rmisston to
~ ~rea. ~o~·~Llm of prope~y~ R/$ ~ull ~d ~e, ~rt, Nee York
(G~ly lot), ~ ~s ~ $6* 01'20" X. 165' ~l ~st, 135' ~ on
W/S C~1j ~u~ al~ ~z~rly l~e of ~ 12, Fo~h--- ~es S 60'
54'30" W. 188' * Weot~ I~g E/S Oul~ ~ ~ne N 68° 19' 0~ 88.9' i
H 43e 00t M.
2. VARIANCE. By resolution of the Board it was determined that
(a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce
hardship because
practical difficultics or unnecessary
S~'n mE
(b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties
alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because
(c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would)
change the character of the district because
(would not)
and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted (
that the previous decisions of the Building Inspector ( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed.
) be denied and
FORM ZB4
IMtty ~ev~lle, Secretar~ Pro 'rem
Southold ~ ~ard of Appeals
Board o~ _/~ea_ la designated, £m~ puxpoNe of ~lfLca~lon,
~~ ~al ~. 1954) ~11 ~ ~ is r~"s'-
.so- oos) ,.
~(~ ~. 20007)
LOT A - Al~a~ investigation and lnSl~otio~ th~ Board
that [pp-~caut r~quests po~assi~ ~ ~ lot ~or ~ ~k
and at.age billd~9 vt~ insufficient viith ~ n on ~ east
aide of Gull Po~ ~, ~e~rt, New l~k. The f~s o~
~d ~e ~t applic~t Is the ~er of ~t'A' as s~ ~ Van
~yl's ~ey of ~anu~ 51, 1970 ~ t~s lOt ~l
~cesa ~ e~al ~ size to ~b~r Iota in ~ s~ivision; ~ t~t
the ~rd of Health and the P~lng ~ ~ve ~~ ~
lot is ~t s~table ~or resident~&l use. ~ ~t Is ~. obligation
o~ t~ ~d of ~als to ~t t~ applio~t ~ m ~s p~r~y
for the ~st r~son~le u~ ~der the Z~ ~d~e ~lch,
The Boa~d finds that strict application of th~ Oz~inance would
produce practical dif.£1cu.lt, les or manse*assay hardship! the hardship
created is unique an~ wou~a not be shared by all properties alike in
th~ t~mediata vicinity of this protmrty and in tim sa~. usa district;
and the variance will not change the character o£ the nelqhborhood,
and will old.rye tl~ spirit of th~ Ordinance.
1. Covenanted a~eements reatrieet~,~ .... ' TM ~
2. T~t ~fore ~ applier my ~ ~t~ ~ge a~
~rl~ privilege for ~11 ~ts as ~ ~oea~U u~, a
s~lal e~eptlon s~ll ~ appll~ for i~ t~ ~rd of Ap~als.
1. Site Plan appr~al s~ll ~ o~lh~ i~ t~ ~
4. Any sanitary facilities installed on this prol~rty shall
be subject to the approval of the l~o~x'd of lle~,lth.
5. That this approval shall be subject to applicant obtaining
proper documents from the State and County Enviz~mm~taZ
Control Commissions.
Vote of the Board: Ayes~- Messrsz Gllliepie, Griqonle,
Hulse, Doyen.
February 26 , 1986
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Wissman, Robert and Charlotte
Premises: Gull Pond La., Greenport, N.Y.
Dear Sirs:
This office represents Robert and Charlotte Wissman who wish to apply
to the Planning Board for site plan approval, pursuant to Appeal Nos.
1954 and 2006, paragraph #3 (copies attached hereto).
We submit herewith copies of site plan (sheet 2 of 3 and 3 of 3) as
well as survey dated 12/9/80, made by Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. We
have, on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Wissman, simultaneously submitted an
appeal to the Southold Town Zoning Board for that board's determin-
ation of the conditions placed on this property.
Please place this matter on your calendar, at the earliest convenient
date, for the board's review.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Patricia C. Moore
Legal Assistant
PCM/df
Encs.
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK
ACTION OF THE ZONING IIOARD OP APPEALS
Dated February 6,
][975
ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD
Reginald Hudao~ a/c Claire Brody & Others
To 136 Front Street
Greunport, New York
Appellant
at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on February 27, 1975
was considered and the action indicated below was taken on your
( ) Request /or variance due to lack of access to property
( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance
(X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance
( )
the appeal
I. SPECIAL EXCEPTION. By 6esolution of the Board it was determined lhM a special exception ( ) be
granted ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Section ................... Subscctiun ................ l)alagr;lph
.................. of the Zoning Ordinance and the decision ot the Building Inspcctm. ( ) be reversed ( )
confirmed because 10:~5 P.M. (E.D.S.~.) upon application of Re~iDald Hudson
a/c Claire Brody & Others, 136 Front Street, Greenport, New York for
a varian=e in accordance with the Zoning Ordinancu, ;~rticl(; iii,
Section 180-~0 B-9 and Bulk Schexlule for penr, ission to us, lot for
mooriag do~k azxd storage building with insufficien£, width and area.
Locatiom of property: E/S Gull Pond Lane, Greenl~rt, ~lew York
(northerly lot), bounded North: Lot 11, flap of Fordh~ua Acres ~.
66[ 01' 2~" ~. 165' ~; East: 140' % on W/S Canal: ~';ou~h 66~ Gl'
W. 170'+~; West~ N 61' 29' l0~ $~. ~40' + on East side Gull fond ~1~.
2. VARIANCE. By resolution o! t~e Board it was dctcnhincd that
(a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) p~oduce
ba~ dship because
SEE REVERSE
practical difficulties
(b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shar(d i,y all liZO;/~i c!
alike in the immediate vicinity of tbis property and in the snme use district bccau~;e
SEE R~VERSE
(c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (world)
c'ban~re the cbaractcr of the district because
and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted (
that th? previous decisions of the Building Iuspcctor ( ) be confiimed ( ) bc reversed.
S~E P~VERSE
FORM ZB4
Z/Q, NING--BOAR1) ,OF APPEALS
Betty ~evtile, Secr~;tary Pro TcIa
Southold Town Board of Appeal:;
}?j~~ After investigation and inspection the Board finds
tha't='~p]~IT~/~t requests permission to use lot for mooring dock and
~torags building with insufficient v!dth and area on the east side
of Gull Pond L~na, Gruenport, NS~ York. The findings of the ~oard
ar~ that applicant is the o~ler o~LOT.'~D~a8 ~h~wn on Van Tuyl's
suzv~y dated Jauuary 15, 1970 and that this lot is substantially in
e×ces~s o~r ~ua~ in size to other .lots l~ the su~ivl~i~, ~d ~t
~.~/~'~uitable~for-resid~tial~u~. ~ow~ver, it l~ the obligd~ion
o~ the Bo~d of Ap~als to permit the applicant to use his property
for the most reasonable use under the Zoning Ordin~e which, in this
case, is acces~ry uf~ to the ordinary re~ential u~.
The Board finds that strict ap~licaticul of the Ordinance
would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the l~rdship created is unique and would not be slmred by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this ~roperty
and in the same use district; and the varl&~ce will not ~hange
the character of thu neighborhood, and will observe the spirit
of the Ordinance.
TIIEREFORE XT WAS RESOLVED, Reqinald ~son a/c Claire Brody
& Others, 136 Front Street, Greenport, New ~ork be Gi%lNTED ~ermlssioa
to set asi~~as applied for in accordance with applicaut'~
metes and bAu~Js~a~"descrihed in the survey referred to above
(surw~f of Van Tuyl dated January 15, 1970), abject to thc
followin~ conditions:
~l~Soy~en_,~a~e~ ~ ~29~, ~tricting or prohibitin this
;,ro2e.~r~s~e~t~al~u~ ~ithout ~rl~ approval of the
2. That before the applicant may be t~.r~itted dockage
mooring privileges for ~all h~ats as an accessory usu, a
special exception shall be applle~ for from the Doard of Appoalm.
3. Site Plan approval shall bo obtained from the. Planning
Board.
4. Any sanitary facilities installed on this property slmll
be subject to the approval of the Board of Health.
5. That this approval shall be subject to applicant obtaining
pro, er documents fro~ the State and County Environmen~al Control
Commissions.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ;~eesrs: Glllispie, Gri~onis,
, Doyen.
FORM NO. 4
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Office of the Building Inspector
Town Hall
Southold, N.Y.
Certificate Of Occupancy
No. Z13071 Date December 18 ~.
THIS CERTIFIES that the building ..... .0 .n.e..f.a. ¢.~.1. y...O.~.e.Z..1 .i.n.~ ....................
Location of Property ~60 Gull Pond Lane GreenDort
Ho.~ ~io: ...................................................
Street Hamlet
County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ... 035 ...... Block ......... 0.~j .... Lot ....... 7...5. .......
Subdivision ............................... Filed Map No ......... Lot No ..............
conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore fried in this office dated
... g.a.y... ~.0 .......... % 1 96./!. pursuant to which Building Permit No. ~. 3. ~.3.'?.Z. ..............
dated .... .J.tlr~. 7-.q ............... 19 .~.4., was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements
of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is .........
·...O.n~. f~ra~. ~.y..clv~.l.lA og~ ...... ~i .................................
The certificate is issued to . .~.~..T..S.P. 5. ?.Z.E.~B.~ .........
(ow.~r~ ~rX~,~, ~t~ .....
of the aforesaid building.
Suffolk County Department of Health Approval ..... J ~-~ 0.-J.3 .. J ~/. ~ 5/.~?t ...........
UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO ............. ?.e.n. d~ .~.~?.... L2./. 17/.¢.q ............
PLUHBERS CERTIFICATION DATED 12/10/84
Building Inspector
Rev. 1/81
7.3A(¢ }
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town llall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
March 31, 1986
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
Mrs. Patricia C. Moore
Leg.al Assistant
Edson & Bruer, Attorneys
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Charlotte & Robert Wissman
Gull Pond Lane, Greenport, NY 11944
Dear Mrs. Moore:
Please be advised that the Board of Trustees took the
following action regarding the'above captioned matter at
their regular meeting held on March 27, 1986.
Moved by Trustee Bredemeyer seconded by Trustee Goubeaud it was
RESOLVED that Robert & Charlotte Wissman be and hereby are granted
a Waiver of the Wetland Ordinance for the construction of a single
family residence on property located on Gull Pond Lane, Greenport.
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate
calling this office at the telephone number listed above.
Very truly yours,
Henry P. Smith, President
Board of Town Trustees
Ilene Pfifferling
Clerk to Board
HPS:ip
Attachment
cc: Bldg. Dept.
Z.B.A.
Trustees
File
FORM NO, 1
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
TOWN HALL
SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971
TEL.: 765-1802
:.xamined . .~....~A'q~... ?.o.. -, 19 ~ .~.
\pproved . 'x~'~ ' 'c?Aq&'''' '~' O .... 19 J. ~.. Permit No. }..~..~.~..~...~
)isapproved a/c .....................................
Received .......... ,19...
(Building Inspector)
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
INSTRUCTIONS
a. Tlfis application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector, with 3
'.ts of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule.
b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets
r areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this appli-
ation.
c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit.
d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Such permit
roll be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work.
e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy
roll have been granted by the Building Inspector.
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the
uilding Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws. Ordinances or
~egulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein described.
he applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to
~mit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections.
(Signature of applicant, or name, if a corporation)
(Mailing address of applicant)
rate whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder.
............... (~..~. v.~.~. ~..,,,.....c?. :~Ta,?~.~.*.. ) ...................
;alne of owner of premises . ¥'~t.~. ~., ~..~.~.~.....-~.P. i(.."~.Z. ~.vl...~.~..~.~..F-=.-.i%..: .................................
(as on the tax roll or latest deed)
· applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer.
..... . .~..o ~ ~..'r.... ~?..c,.~... ¢.~..*..a, ......
(Name and title of corporate officer)
Builder's License No ..........................
P · ·
lu nber s L~cense No ........................
Electric' a ~ s L~cense No .....................
Other Trade's License No..'.-. ..................
Location of land on which proposed work will be doue. ~'/~'.-...~t ?.Q..(:-. .~.o..~..C)...t.?..~..~.._..~. ~.~..~.~.~/..o77. ~(~. ?.0
.............. ~,.o. .......... .~.~. x.t,., f.q w. :3....t..~.e. ....... .~..~.~.e.o. ~ :.... ~...~(. ....
ltouse Number Street Hamlet
County Tax Map No. 1000 Section ...~..~..~. ......... Block . ..~. .............. Lot j>~..r~,.~....
Subdivision ..................................... Filed Map No ............... Lot ...............
(Name)
· State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction:
a. Existing use and occupancy ....~..~..~..~..~.~...~. ~ .~..O. 7 ............................................
b. Intended use and occupancy '~n .M..fit....~..~...~..~..L: .~...I.~..l~. ~..l~h ~..t~.'.~. ............................
&
3. NarC]re of work (check which applicable): ~'M'~rw Building . .v.... .... Addition .......... Alteration ..........
Repair .............. Removal .............. Demolition .............. Other Work ...............
(Description)
4. Estimated Cost ..... ~"'~,.~.~.O..O..~. ....................... Fee ......................................
(to be paid on filing this ~p~p~c~on)
5. If dwelling, number of dwelling units ...... .~.. Number of dwelling units on each floor o~.. ?..'./..~ ~.'.~.. ~Z.
If garage, number of cars . .,,'.~ ......... ' ' '
6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify na_~.J~e and extent of ea~ch type of use ..... ...........
7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front ............... ~ Rear .............. ~ epth ...............
Height ............... Number of Stories ........................................................
Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front ................. Rear ..................
Depth ...................... Height
8. Dimensions ~f entire new construction: Fr(}z~t' ' ' ' .~~''' ........ t~;~rNumber of Stories ............ · ..........
Height .. ~ ,O .......... Number of Stories ' 1'4~i i 3/',~ ..... ~..~..t ......... Depth ,,',~. ...........
9. Size oflot: Front .../.~..O .............. Rear ./.~.'-~i~ 'I~;;~t;'~.'.~.'i' iiiiiiiii .....
10. Date of Purchase ..... ./.~'. ,~. ................. Name of Former Owner ~'
11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated ........
12. D6es proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation: . ./M..~.). ....................... ' '
13. Will lot be regraded ... ,~.~.. ;... ..... .~_..:, ...... ,: .,~1 ex,qe~ fill .be,removg.Cl from premises: Yes
14. Name of Owner of premises .~.~..g?.ql .~.g. fJ.~ff.~.~.~.~ffd~ess ~t~,i~.~°~-.r,~.~t~ Phone
Name of Architect .. J,.a. ~C,. q..W.~?...~..~,(. ~ .~.$. Address .~.a/g o~..c&3 ~. ..... Phone No. ~.~ ,~,~ ~5-"/'
Name of Contractor . ~, ~.~.~.~.. r~.ff.~.~ .~. J~a~.g. Address ~ II.o.~.~,r~ ~ feaT'Phone No .............. :.
PLOT DIAGRAM
Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and. indicate all set-back dimensions from
property lines. Give street and block number or description according to deed, and show street names and indicate whether
interior or corner lot.
';'FATE OF NEW YORK, S.S
2OUNTY OF .................
....L..~..'w...oz. ~ ~ .~. -.~....~. ~..~. o...4 P,~ ................ being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the applicant
(Na~ne of individual signing contract)
~bove named.
. .~.~. (Contractor, agent, corporate officer, etc.)
)f said owner '~r owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this
~pplication; that' all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the
.york will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith.
¢worn to before me this
..... · ~/....[~. day of . ~ .r.t~. ........ 197..~
'4otary Public,. ....... ~. ~.-...~..'..,.~ County ~ ~_ ,
NOTARY PUSLIC c of Nev~ York . . ~. ........... ~. 2 .~ . .~. ~.; ...........
,o 470~' , %,,~v _ (S~nature of applicant)
./
.I
i
· I
"%,
Sc,'-,,'~E' 4.0;
%,
RODI~RICK VAN TI,,L~L, P.C.
LICENSED LAND SURVEYORS
GREENPORT NEW YORK
SUFFOLK (20. HEALTH DEPT. APPROVAL
H. S NO.
STATEMENT OF INTENT
THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL
SYSTEMS FOR THIS RESIDENCE WILL
CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS OF THE
SUFFOLK CO. DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES.
(si
APPLICANT
'-~UFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH
SERVICES - FOR APPROVAL OF
CONSTRUCTION ONLY
DATE:
H. S. REF. NO.:
APPROVED: ........
SUFFOLK CO. TAX MAP DESIGNATION:
DIST. SECT. BLOCK PCL
OWNERS ADDRESS:
' :. ' "":~"
DEED: L. &&~
TEST HOLE
C~.AY
,ir
SAND
SAND
GrPAVEL
SEAL