The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-35.-2-14 I i '\!' ;j- I N I If) ~ lit .~ E '~ ~ .; t ' .~ s:: UJ ~ 'f ~ ~~ o 'i L-j - I / ..., .," /....... _.#'~...-. ',.,.. REFERRED TO: ~ing Board of APpe~js (wrlllen c~mments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees ~ding Department (certification) . ~folk County Department of Planning /Department of Transportation -St:lte DJPartment of Transportation - COUnty vS~lk County Dept. of lIe:1lth vFire Commissioners I SITE PLAN Presub mISSIOn conference . .._. (within 3D days of wotten reqtie6~.) Complete appHcation received (within 4 mon~hs of gresub, conference) Applic:ItIOn reviewed at work session (within 10 days of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions' (within 3D days of revielvl Revised submission received Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination RECEIVED: Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions Approval of site plan' -With conditions Endorsement of site plan . .. " ......- .r'__ Certificate of Occupancy inspection One year review ) :J ~ 2/-1Sf,~', ~ ~~ ) ~- J.2,- 7$ 1'OO'llin:l ~~ I'OO'llfQKl ~~ .2. -'6 -11 7! /'1/q"l - t; ft-F Pa..r 3 ElB [ZiITlr=J ~e.J ic:<, .- " '-" "r.:::-:, r:-:-'j .rr\ I I '_'....4~...~ -~~ 1'-"" r::oj u.", II',.,,' --..:.....- 1'-" " r:::-1, .m 111....' ~ l..:ollr:::--<j :_m II\..K ~~ Sent: Received' 1'OO'llr;:;;;-J ~~ 1'OO'llr;:;;;-J ~~ r:<m1r;:;;;-J ~~ /iIDllr;:;;;-J ~~ f:1OO'rIr=; -~~ 1)[.C1:1[~ ~~ r.<oour;;;;, ~~ , r:<m1r;;;;l ~~ E:'I (;;l .....:.,..'co->i. . ., y . '// ./ ,; ~ PLANNING BOAHD MEMBE' RICHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ,....';,IlHOl.t~..c ., .,:ll~\,,~ t'o. "". ,y'f$ ~ ~ ,I;::;:, . :2 ,,' "jo' . . 'I U') ":) \Joo': ;0", .~. ~. 'y'." ~/'I(}-! co. ~ -.:-~~.:--::::-;;- Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee PLANNING BOAHD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPUCATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PlAN -.lL New _Change of Use Re-use Extension ReVISion of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: existing cabins at Hellenic Snack Bar & Restaurant Location: 5145 Main Road. East Marion Addr9ss: Name of Applicant: Gus X. Hartofelis & John Giannaris by Anthony M. Salvati,R.A. Address of Applicant: c/o Patricia C. Moore ESQ.. P.O.Box 483, 315 Westphalia Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Telephone: (';1/;) 7QR-'ih2Q Owner of Land: ~I~ Y R~T~nfAli~ ~ .Tnhn ~iannariR Agent or Person responsible for application: Patricia C. Moore Esq. Address: P.O.Box 483, 315 Westphalia Road, Mattituck NY 11952 Telephone: (516) 298-5629 Site plans prepared by: Dominick Salvati & Son License No.: Architects , 356 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 , --'. L~ f~ :i Address: Telephone: (718) 855-4686 o ~~., - ~ ~ - !'o 03 . , ~. .,.u~ ~ ~ .. ~~ .. "'j"'!111!!""': ;1;;" ': I ~,i :~T~1! ':! ''''I''''''''~' .,...."',,''', , ~~ !~'!"H' "'.' " ""',' ,'.'. "'.'" '..'r"'..,'" ," ..." " "i:1,", ',,/'I,,;-(:'ch'.'I'f"" .""~"":':'-"'~'~.;t";,,llW"'-"~ ~ &.~ , ': I' ~ i, ~ ! " ".~,-~'ijjj,,' . " O'Qe 3 p;annll"lQ l3oar{'l 511p. Plan APPIlr.ilflnfl ?.2A'i Ac,.otalLandArea of $Ite (aCreS or square feet) u- :~,,'~~: Zoning District r.mllmAl:..~lI1.,~XI$ting Use of Site (owned 1.Sl0 ac,""" arid l.eBsed .765) existil1g cab ins, (,{ r l,cu, lIr'ld nstaurant ~~jDlIl~~!~,"iiii rroposeCl Use qf Slte_::;;;;.i~;' ~;;;':_::;itJ;:;:';;'~~;:fi:~J\~!i:.::::.::~, 9853:-:1r:F'J"iro5SF!OOr Area Of e;~lstln9 strUctLire<i.i"'''-' ...... .".", "'.- -.---.----.- l1..!.35.~. ~. F...cro:.s Floor An~a of Propo~d structurl!(sl 13.75 ~ Percent of Lot coverage by BUilljlnQ(SI -"4:~:'%::=:p~rcent of Lot for Parl<;lng IWhere applicable) 8l.8? ~,.."~rcilnt of Lot for L3ndtc:::lplng (whore Jpplicnb"ll (INCLUDING EXISTING BLACKTOP DRIVE) Has dj.)IJll(.d/lL U,","fl yr i:lnLI:j\j a variance ana/or r,pp.claJ 'i'XCeptliln OV _" "....... 80arCl of Appeals, Casefl; & date> . ..._______._ Board of Trustees. Case # & oa te --,....-...........NY State Department of EnVlronmenI.1i'ccinse~-;jtiO"i1"7'case'#'&-dafe '---"-::",::::SuffOII< CountY Department Health ServlcOls " Case /I &date___-- Case Numclir ----.. ,.. Name of Applicant --_.......--Di1te of Decision --..-........-.."..,-.." .. .. Expiration Date -..., '''Other ,.,~",."".~~-",,-.._------_........,.~-,. Will any toxic or ha~arQoI,l$ f'I1itefl31s, a, oeflned by till, Suffolk County Board lif H!!ilit,h Ill' stored or hilncJled at the slt~? _............If so. h::lVe proper permits been otltalr,E-d? __"..."... . Name of Issuing agency, _........__.........'.m.'..'''.,..._._.._.__........____..... ___, ,.. Number and date of permit_,.__.."....,....,...."....,..,...,_.__ no NO ACtiON 1F.'<l.AVA TlON OR CONSTRUCTIONJ MAl' BE I)NOf"'I'A~1!N UNitt APPiIIOVl1l OF SITF. PLAN 8y' PlANNltVC ROARD VIOlA TORS ARE SUIJ.J!C'f 7'0 JJP,()stCl/ncJN: '" , . .II~ ~ .:~.!J.'~'-rft,' r;: '-,.__._---.,~.......,' . "....__.il ....... l/I'lh';~i~~~i"""'. . .,lIlIijjlrllliillloUlMiIOll'",__ L~; ."l. "VMU"R -'-J SEaR 617.21 Apj)elldl~ C ~'B,lt, I'tl'!fml'lll'l~nt~l Qualny flovlmw SHOAT ENVIFlIJNMENTAL AsseSSMENT FORM /l',"UNI.ISTID ACTIONS Ollly PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION CTI;r bR ~omJJI~IM ~T Al'pl.;am ~r 11lOI'ClI "~ll'l~j~rJ ....._, "..~ ,., "--- ".-~~I~"~"';,. _~ I, APPII(~'NT ,r.~o'lcon /.' I. ~IW.l"CT ,j~'M! G't~ X, 1l1lrt.ofel1 II Ft ,fohn Gbnnnio llell.en1c Cabins 3. PQOJeCT LOCATION: __.._..._...__..."" ._.....__.. .. .____....._. MUMOlCOHty Southold Tow . Coon'. Suffolk 4. "Qe';,se .OC. TION ISI,OOl O<Idrf.. 411<1 road ,.1"'....11.";:-;;,;;;;;;., "n....,... .,;,. <If POl..". ",... ".--." -- exist ins cabins .:It Hllllet'dt' S'U..hlllllr & R""tmll:",lt ~145 Main ROad, East MSTion ..,--,._o-..._......_.........._...~__ ~. IS PRCPO'i;ec4CTlON' o ~!:~, _._0 e'P4n3Io. e. oeSCmeE PROJECT SRIEFL VI -construction of modern cabins at subject l't"llperty. maintaining llama density of existing cabins - ~.._-.......", _.~.-......h~..._......." ............"......-....--..._.n.._......"..__ e9 Mod!tll;llJlt~n/t'4II"'fJlj(.lh ..,.,.''".-......._-''..~'''',.........-.~,--~ --~---~_."",._"",,.- -l 1. AMOUN10F'i:.1i'Il.AifoOTEO: . ------..1-':.;.0'...... ,."'....."'..__._...__..~___._. I I II" ..')~ U ..>.. '---..''''- · '-..-- - lei.. ",,.."'V .-....."'..'-'1"...., .,,,.,, : a:-wii:t:"ii"I;()~o ACTION COMPLY WITI4 e~'SlINO zONIN<i.Oii~jT;;e;;f."~c;;;~;3f:A:i,il\i$iR~irAA;Tiii;.;,i7,-_.._..._.......___ ag y.. 0 "0 If No. .....,t. Oriellr Pll'",..dot 1.1,1l!l cab !,II!; ---_. ----.-..._,...,.,..__......,...".,..........,_..~.............._,._..,.,.,-....."-- !t. WJo1^ r !G ~t:!F,~iitH LANO USI IN VICINI"'V r.';; ,wllltCJGCr'" o Ah~,~Jd'l'lllllll OlnelJ3UIOIIf 0 Cornl'l'll'"r:UII OUOCfl~I.,': r" t.....j A1lf1f:IJI'lJr"" [,f "'irkH~?r~1I0tJtr'r 'll)~~ -~,._.,."~~,,..,.,....'"'-_._,-, Golf Course fj Otho. and I/Ulage of G"lltll1.p"n ( land leased by applicant) - -" --_..~..........................,-~"u.,'~..___~_".,.J~,__. 'g. 00€5 ACTIO" '''VO~V! A P~F!Mlr APPROVAl.. OR PU"OIN", NOW on U\:'.....rfl.. ."~lMAN'f OT~IPq ,~c...;" S1A T~ Oil LOC~( I? (iJ T., 0 No If v,~. If II lIIUM<:)1r.1 ...,~v "~lfl'~'I'U;)DPIQ"'I'II~ He,.I~;I, 1)"'I,;jttmene .,~-------.._~._,~:---- U.;r~tj~AI. '~~;:H~NCY ir';OE',IMl II Me; M'" A~"~C, V" THe ACTlO~4 H~V" A cVllIliii<rLv v_UQ ,.eR"i;"';'R 'Pp)o~;:;.'1 Orte~ 0 IIIII' " YUG. llllt 19'encv name .net perMU./.QIlI",rQIr'~lj ~ ""_"'_~__------ '.. ....-..'.---... ,I!"~ .~lllu cabins 4"".1 .elil:llUTlllnt ':. AS A ReSU~1 OF Pl10POSEO ACTION WI.L !J<IST1NO-l"ERMITIAPPIlOVIIL "eO'Jll'ltNior;~TloN7 (jh.. 0 N. upgrade S4ni~ny , ._......._..._'~.....,,~,.........._--~...~"""""-- I C.RTlF'f 1H~T THE INI'QRMATlClN P"OIilOfC "UllOf I~ ,,,..,<< TO 1HIi' dES'!' OF "'IV (NOW - -.............- ...." -'-.--,-_.","-.~ A~"'IC""t/~Cl;)":'lor nQIT'I\t~ Anthony M. S~lvati, k.A. U'OO~ SIQ"4tlJlf: = ~ /;?--~. , , ..........u'.~ .,_~~... .I.."'.--.._--,.....,.........~..._.........,""-,.,...".,,,...,'"--....__ / c.,.: ,/'t.... /it..t..!.f.U. ..-.....----....-- . .......--..--... ',t the acUon I~ In the COIl'l!al Arolll, 11I"~ y",,,, arrr a :l14it! llg~ncy. c~mp4et, the COastal Assessment Form bolore PI'QCrllJrlln'3 wl'li1 ~\O US&'s$mel'lt - OVER I "P','~I,\ ' ....--- PART II-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE ENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE f T HOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? If yes, coordina (he review process and use the FULL EAF. DVes DNa B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR. PART 617.67 If No. a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. Dves DNa C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY AOVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOllOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality. surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal. potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural. archaeological, historIc, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna. fish, shellfish or wildlife species. significant habitats., or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted. or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly cs. Growth. subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term. cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C5? Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE. OR JS THERE UKELY TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSe ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? DYes 0 No If Yes, explain briefly PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIF:ICANCE (To be completed by Agency) . INSTRUCTIONS: For e"ach adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large. important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (1) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. o o Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY oCCUL. rhen proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any. significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the .reasons supporting this determination: Name oi lead Agency Print or Type Name of ResponSible Officer in lead Agency TiUe of Responsible Officer Signature or ResponSible Officer in lead Agency Signature ot Preparer (If different from responSible officer) Date 2 ._..,..eo. 617.21 Appendix C Slate Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) . I . SEaR ;=Si-.', 14016.4/2187)- Text 12 _ .. ." I PROJECT 1.0. NUMBER - 1- APPLICANT ISPONSOR I 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality County .. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: DNew o Expansion o Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres 6. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRiCTIONS? DYe. DNa If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT 1$ PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? o Residential o Industrial o Commercial o Agriculture o Park/Forest/Open space Dothe, Describe: 10. COES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? DYe. DNa If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT DR APPROVAL? DYe. DNa If ye~, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? DYe. DNa I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Date: SIgnature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 .- Ji.. " i. ". . . . Pao~ 2 PiannfflO HC.lf" ')i(~ .'IUI"l ACOllf:atlon APPUCANT'S AFfIDAVIT STATE OF NEWVORK COUNTY OF st.If'RlLK John Giannaris eelng dUlY sworn, der,osas aM 111~'S mat he resld.as at 5145 Main Road, East Marion ._ ~""_'_"U"'_. _~__......_......_........u ,,', .., ..__....._. In the State Of New York. and mat 11& Is the Owner Of 1'118 above :'JI'operty. or lhilt he is ti1e Owner property/partnership Gus X Hartofelis of the --.-...........,.-.. -. -....__.-.._..._.......u.......,..._~_ lrltl~r tr.paclly WI1"'~Uf Ptlrtf1f>I1"'in nr r:r\rp I whiM i~ I'llilrilbV m~k'l'1g llCCIlCIUll'I1'I """P Pl'.... .,. I ".. W\r~iJnlil !ltT\J!!!UN~3 ~r i1'\~"r~'y..III.II~. ..,11 \.11'1 rana Whir,h IITf! nnr IMllrn nn tho alto 1'110111, IJII&e ...! !Ill.. L.... Ll,v ""'1.Ir 11 loIilll,lll. Illnllnlno all fI9ntN:1f'W:JV, nl)~ tl.-"I' 1~1r:,,( Iy i~t~:J!i;Jnoo ,jna I~ ~1'I)\IJn on said ~I!~! I; I.IIl!, no oart ()r l.tIr~ P1rln Infrln!JQi UllQn :;ny nlflv fil..ri pl:lr, ....I'iul' 'Ill: :"::,~ r.o!~I', ."".,IIUUfltld ocm <35 to lOt.'! a"d as to toads; th;Jt hl2 has examined all rules and reau/atlons ,~dl'l('lrF>rj bV the PI~nnin9 BOilrd for the mif1.~ ,if .~I\tJ l':l:lI1S ;;1'10 Will ccrnolY with SGn'te; that ~he plans suomltteC'l, as approved. will not be altered or changed in .1nv manner without the approval Of the Planning Soar,1; iill1dlt1at the actual p!W~IC31 Impmv..m(mt~ wlfi 0';' irl9111U~ .!n strict Jr::I;ordilm:!! with me plans SUbmttF.d. Slgnedt/}1~ ~nt;'j' - S!;ned'i, ~~.....-...._- , IO'lrr"ll'llt or ::O"'.~4':.1!!! orn:;t1' ",nJ TIl.lwJ Sworn to me thIS /~M ,/7___..r' ." - . _ ,'.. ",- _A...._____.._ :Not Putll~) 191.?:.._ PAT?!.....'!I r l\",nOIlE NotRr': " ~J0V.! York 5,,1' .,51668 Com ..h,..).; L^i-",.~;)Jl,fle 16._ i., toAOOl\.E :fl\,\CIP- c. 01 Nll'lI'Iol'Io ~u'o\\C' St~~o. 4116'6~ 1tO'8 ,I< COuntV .)Una ,6. &~~ E1<(lIf8ll CD"'" . ,/,' ;. . , .. :, j.">1..ANNlN<l BOARD MEMn.' RKRAROG. WARD . enninn.n -~-_.....- (:lWll(~l!: RrrclUE 'LATHAM, JR. Bh:NNET'I' C)\'tLOWSKI, JR. WIl,LIAM J. CREMERS I\ENNETH I. EDWARDS " ~~ : . ~. '\111, .1' "tnr ." ,.!" ^ ltI.Ur<~.r ;,';\. '.' ~"\l "l? " .Ii ~Y' : ''12' ~ I)'~ ...~.~ ,"= .:...f..' ,", en l:l!r : 'j_~ ::;J-., , ., ~ . -'1;'M .. ~' ~:,,~./ .. '\~., '.' . t:, '_" .~.. ..., ,:: . 'n" Ap [Z-?-- f'e> 'rown Hull, :5:1110" MAin ROIId P.O B", 1170 tlouthold. Nnw Ynrk U97l Fc.x i$16) 'ifl5.~13fl Tel.phon.. !l5111) 7liS.19.~R PLA.Nl.'l"ING ROAltD ()l~FICE 'TOWN OF SOt.J'l'HOLD Oat!! Roceived ,-"--- Dat~ Completed ==FlllfI.;J F~e APPUCATION FOR CONSIDEAATtONOF ^ SITE PLAN -X- Neill Change of Use -'Re.usli' Extension =~"VI~Ir)11 of Approved glte Plan Name ot euslr,ess or Site: ~tin.l7. C.g2J.Jlli_ltLl!.~.U!.!1Js...!nack nUT [. Restaurant Location: 51"; )(.~ tl n~",.J.....Ii~!!~.He..'ll..':'A'._ Addr'=s~ . _.._........................................._~......._.._-- Name Of Applicanl: ellS ~, Rllr,SS'..t'!luL.~,,~~M..HWMI.iL.P.1' Anr.hony M. Salvad,R.A. Address of Applicant. r/0 'P1T~,..1d"..c....Jil~.!L::~u......_~.O.I\Olt 48,,), 315 Westphalill Road M~r.tituck, NY 11952 ielepl,one: (~ 1 F.) ?CHI_ ~'" ?<l ........__....'..." _....___~__ owner Of L3no, /':!ue if 1'I"..~or-..l.1'" ..li..--1cl:.u..ili.;w.nW5..._. Agent or Person responslClle P i i t'" 1- at r en.. "'('O~P. '''''l. for apPlication: ~_.....-_.............-.. AddrQS~' P.O.Bo7. 48'3. 31' Wllaqlhlll!;;. Road, Mllttituck NY 11952 --... ...,--..-.-............. '., .....-......-.......-.-...-- Telephone: . . (516) 298-5629 ___.' II. .._......-...... .... ,.,'...--------. Site plans prepared by: ; Dominick Salvati 6< Son .._----.__....._..~..-.._....~........_-- Ucense No, Architectli -.. .-...-..-..'...... .....................,....~..~.__.._....._.... Address, 356 Ful tOil Si: ~ee t. Il r.""kl.y,t, NY 11201 -_. "..-............. .., :.,...........,....._~..._.._... Telepncn", (718).8~?::~~!?f!...."."... .. ...... -, .~......_.'.~.~~,._.. '---1 - r' ,..... :C' 00 rn @ [! "'-' r;\. I._~m> I sc~ :'~:..:r:i;' ~ F~ t, ' Ni~T-- ...-....... .,."',,. ..-..-....~" ...--... ~ . . 617.21 Appendix C ~\a,ljl, ~n"l",n/llent..., OLlahty Flovlllw SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSeSSMENT FORM ll'or 'IJtiL1S'tao ACTIONS Ollly PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION erg DR COmlll~IJIl i)\, ,l.pph<;anl nr 111QI~OI ;11l11llvlirJ I, ~PPII,;.H1T-;:~OllCOI1 '" .. " I. ~AUJijCT IIA''''! ,,--'" Gu," X, Hartgfe11 A it ,lohn Gbnn.uic. Hellenic Cabins . --....-...-.....". 3. PAOJECT ":CA TlON: M~ltIC'lil~ Southold Town Coon"~ Suffolk 4. "Re';;~e l.OCAT10N (Str~et ~darlt,. oM roadlRlft31lCUonl:, "tnmt"~f IlnOrfl,al'tc:r. ~. ar:pl1)vlUt8 morn ~:~~T ' ;:;. 'lu:.lu.eR ~ sea ~ .11;" ,~:l:'" -i...' I~ exist 1ng cabins :11; Hellard" lh'3C]' .BAr- .. R""tnur:lIlt ,14~ Main ROad, East Marion $. IS P~C;:t,)SEO "eTION' CJ 'low 0 E'C~MI.n e. OESCmSE PROJECT SAIEF~Y: ..-...-..", .._._.......-......_.._~ --..-............- ~ ModUiQ4d"ntt'4t',.,'3tloll ...._~_....._-"..~..~.~--- -construct 10n of llIodern cabins at subj ect. I,,'opere)'. DIlIinta.ining sam" density of existing cAbins ._._~.~,,_.'A'_~ ..............._ 7. AMO\J"r OF '-tllo, 2ffeCTEO: :",tIAlIv .....' I ..i 20 "Cro~ Ultlrnnl't'v _...__......~_..._.,....., ~r'/'l a. WILL .o~oP\j~eo .\CTION COMP!. Y WITH eXfSTINQ ZONING .on~3T;;eftf'X;1.r'I~~~);:A;;cI';iiAEirnlcTiON;;" I]j YQ~ 0 N4 11 NO. ~Olcrlbdl CrieH,!, pll'~..><ioL l.,"~ ca'b Ul!< .-.......,.........................".... .---.....-...---_......_--_...~_.._. ,. W'J'1^i l~ P~F.~iitH L-,\NO USli IN I/IC~HI1Y r..'j; J.lAOJECT'''!' C 1=I":.-:'h1MI:d D InCU=Hlitl 0 CommttfCl#l1 O"'CUl)",: ,.. WAtlul:I,lU\Jr". r'''' l..: P,ttkl'~"re=tlOpOn 10:ili~ Co,,,,,, GIll f Course and Village of Clrc",npurr ( land leased by applicant) 10. CtJES I~H:rIOfl mVOLve A p~~MJr APPROVAl.. OR 'UUQIN(~, NOW on-~j\;;;;r~Y";;";OM ""NY Ontp:q ,;c1~;i,:i"IMr.tH'AI,. ,.u~N[;r7i;OEM'- GlATE QR Lee..:)? "" ~ H.." I r,l, Uo'lI'i1t'tlUl!ut ~ ""11 L.: NCI I' ".,. ill' 1l1t1!:'l"l()\I" ....1'1 alm'ml.lC"'l)\'l\I~ - It MGC ~". ...~~.cr ur 111!; ACO:Ctl WAVE A CVl'lIleNrl.Y VA~IO "EP,MIlII~ .PS'ROVAl." OrtG~ 01110 II )'Vei, lI,;t IfjCnCV n.QIM ,net ponnltlal;lCtQVlll ....~ Hl,,!> c:nbi..", Au<1 ....scaurant - - ,t, AS'" ReSULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WIl.L ElCISTINOI'EAMlTlAFFHOV.\L neOIJIflE MODlrtCATIOU1 Gl~... 0 ",. upgrade sani~ary - --..... I C.RTlFY THAT THE INI'QI'iMATlON pnOVIOl;C ,~DCV! 1$ 'ItnJ~ ro T..e BES~ OF MV ~NOW~EOCE _...._a.._ ..........~.....__..,..-_..._~...- / C.,,: /'tv /?"L.f:..9b ACI.llCI"tf~Dcm'or "~I'I'\.: A.nthony M. Slilvac1. R.A. -.... ~ /4~~__ Sf!)";I"".: --.....----~---- If the action J~ In the Cnasbl Arm:!. llll~ yuu artS' il statb ~glilm:y. c::mple10 the Coastal Assessment Form bofore prQcrJerHrt!;j WI'!" l1'tlQ asses$rnent -. eVeR I . ~ . .. --. -- 'i. (imm!'!!~~~~HI.mli~~~'F;~I:"!!HPPfd! \: 1; ~lf~~mH~f."m'~. I.'T!,!,!~,nf:F';' ~. : I ''" ~ I . ~ I I ". ,. I ' ' I! t ~ I I It '. !.'. ' : .,it ...:It,:4IHI ""1 . . ~.ge 3 P~nnlng !le~r~ S,t.. Plan ApPIlr.~r"HI d 2.2RS AC;otal Land Area of' $Ite (acres or square fel!tJ (owned I.S20 I\CTl\S and lea Bed .765) LB -~~~)onlng District cl1lllCl.6.till1..~xIS~ing Use of Site existinB <:i1blns. (~r fl.ce. and restaurant "J,ll\lJJl&.):!:.i.i!}>rop~eCl Use Of Site u.p;;:'~~"'~';~j~:;;;~::a~~:::~li Del: liI4t.~ [>1"-;'\-=:::. 985'3.~s'T.Gross Floor Area Of Existing StructurelS)'-..-..._.................. , '...-.-..-.----.----- ~ 35~~:.~_.crQSE Floor Area ofl Proposed Stl'ucturp.{SI _~.3. 75..~".Percent Of Lot Coverage oy Buildlng(s) 4:r:~_.__percent of Lot for Parking (Where appllcabla) 81.85 .iL. ~lircint of Lot for L3ndtC3plng (where ;JpplicabtQI (INCLUDING EXISTING BLACKTOP DRIVE) Has aWIl(.dlll U~II 'ill ClrJle:u a variance ana/or special exc:eptl011 oy ,P._.......Bcara Of AppealS. Case ill & aate....__.......____ Bcare of Trustees. Case # & date -.-..-......--Ny State Department Of envlronmenciirCcinse~;jtlon . 'case # &aate --'--=':".:=:SlJffoll< CountY Department Health Services. Case # & date C ass Numcllr ........--Name of Applicant --=:.:::~~Date of DeciSion ----.--..--...."....-....-- Expiration Date =-~:.:.:~:Other ..--.....----- Wilt any toxic or hazardOus materialS. ,;, oeflne<J bv th~ SuffOlk County Board of HI!O'llth l'lP stored or handled at tne site? ._........!f ~o, have proper permits been obtained? __.. .....Name of Issuing agency, _._.____.._........".........._..._._..__........____..... ___..... Number and date Of perl'n1t_.___.........................".__.._ nl'l NO ACTION 1F.~l-:AVATION OR CONSTRUCTIONJ iV,AY 8E UNIXI!1'AA.'G'N lINrtL APPROVAL OF ~'"ITF PLAN By Pl..~NNlNC ROARD VIOLA TORS ~E SUB./(Cr TO PROSJiCU17CN. . '" 'JU I 2.!.-o "--' ..__ -"., Jl ! I U..,l- 2. 'oJ ;!.-o..jo ". I:..I~ , i . . PaQ~ ? ~lannln~ AC.lft:' ';if~ Plan AOOllr.atIOl"' APPUCANT'S AFFID^\I1T STATE OF NEW 'lOR!: COlJNTY OF StIFFOUC John Giannaris -..-.-- . ,-,...,..,..,...,,,~ being Cluly swom. dePOSIlS arKl111Y$ m3t he resides at ..,,;~- 5145 Main Road, East Marion --'''_''''''._'_''U'''' ,. -~.--......._._...~.-...~.....~ -'.' .., ".'..,., .""".,_....,-,,,.._-"..~... In the State of New Vork. and that Ilia Is the OW!"ler Of '.h~ g!:JCV!~ ,mlP,my. or l.tlilt iie is tr..e property/partnership Gus X Hartofelis _._?::!:.~.r....m._. _. Of the__~_.__._.._......__."._....._",,_ _"_'" lTItl~i 1~>PHCjly Wl'.y'i1lli P"tntmihin nr f:tl", I whlrh Ii hlilrl1lbV rr~klng gCllIICIl..,11'I1'I 'I'I'I~~ rI',... .,. II'~ 1I'1\1~i.lnlillWUl!!~lJr!~3 i1ll' il'l'",r~'y..11 '.I'~. IJlI U "1 JenlJ Whir;h ~rfil nnf SMllrn nn tho ilto /'111111, "'In W'.! !ltl" lIJ U 'I' '1"11.1111 /.I1l11"tll, InOllnl110 all rI9tlti'Of"'WJV, I1Q~ ~"I' 1:'I~:,'II\' ii'litilbllunea Jna I~ ~11l)1,\1rI on sal.:J ~'I'~II; I.h~t no oort (~r m" PIli" Infrln!Jlii l~lICln ~nv nlll\l .IIM pi"" ",I,M! I"D~ l'Inr ['.!o!j', cl.J.lluun\lld [,.10m as to IOt.~ and as to loads; that he has examlnea all rules and reQu/atJons .ldnntM by the PI~nnlng BOllrd for tl,e nIi11';J \)r~lt\t r-lal1s mo will ComolV with sarr.e; that the plans SUtlmlttea, as approved, will not be altereCl or changed in .1ny manner wfthout the approval of trill Planning Soar\l; ana that ttle actual pIW~lcallmpmv.!rn"irlt~ wlU l:l$ irl91~llll'1d.ln 'trlct aCt;OfOilnc:e with tne plans SUbnilttRd. Signed Slgned..:./-__........_.._...____.._, ([:)';1'1:"1:111' C)Y ~~om.Mte ON'i\.':ltl' &uu Tli.lwl Sworn to me tt~A. / .if., -r:;J,Ji.t<H~ 19-2..", ~.~ -..... . -.. ....-...P-. '___ (NOtary ''''' ANITA Plt.TE , NOTARY PUBLIC, Slale of New York No. 4695444 Qualified in Suffolk County C'ommission Expires Marcil 31,' 19.3..J mAy I PLANNINGBOARDMEMB~:\::.. ..' at, ~~~ffOl.t~ ....~.:_ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. #JI~ Chairman ::::t:..c. Q . WILLIAM J. CREMERS en :2: KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~ ~ GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. ~. <;:::,~ RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 27, .1999 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Hellenic Cabins, Main Rd., East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 Dear Ms. Moore: The Planning Board has not heard from you in response to the letter it sent you on July 20, 1999 (copy enclosed). Please respond in writing as to the status of this account. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, 10/jj! I) j ):J.~ -::;, 7/' i, J-.~- (~z- j<)--JZ~ ~. Robert G. Kassner Site Plan Reviewer cc: Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement Gus X. and John Giannaris enc. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARDG. WARD . PLANNING BOARD MEMB. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chainnan Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 20, 1999 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Hellenic Cabins, Main Rd., East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 19, 1999: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and as lead agency, in its review of this unlisted action finds that the action may significantly effect the environment, and makes a determination that an EAF Part III be prepared. The EAF Part III should include the following: . A hydrological study of the ground water conditions on-site, with additional discussion of the potential impacts to the groundwater. . Soil analysis . Traffic analysis . Land use and zoning analysis due to the large number of variances Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, W Bennett Orlo Chairman . . ( I I I , \ \ \ I June 29, " , Patrici Moore, Es . 51020 ain Rd. Southo ,NY 1197 Re: Pr posed a ended site plan for Hellenic Cabins, Main Rd., East Marion SC M# 10 0-35-2-14 The following r solution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held n'Monday, June 28, 1999: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and as lead agency, in its review of this unlisted action finds that the action may significantly effect the environment, and makes a determination of a Positive Declaration. "'. If you wish to co duct formal scoping, please submit a draft scope and the process will be conducted in accordance with 6NYCRR Part 617.8. Enclosed pie se find a copy of the Positive Declaration for your records. Please cont ct this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, I I i I Bennett brlowski, Jr. Chair'l'an enc. . . State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Date: June 28, 1999 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Title of Action: Hellenic Snack Bar SEQR Status: Type I Unlisted ( ) (X) Project Description: The project which is the subject of this declaration involves a request for an amended site plan approval to demolish existing structures consisting of two (2) . . Page 3 SEQR Positive Declaration - Hellenic Cabins June 28,1999 of the lot area (1.519 acres), or an approximately 13,233 SF building footprint. Under existing conditions, the building coverage yields approximately 17% while under proposed conditions the lot coverage yields 22.6%. The site is an existing non-conforming use within the LB district. The proposed project requires the following variances: . Front yard setback for "Future Office" and Unit 1 . Side yard variance for Units 1 & 4 . Rear yard variance for Units 2, 3 & 4 . Minimum lot size variance . Lot coverage variance . Expansion of a non-conforming use variance The impact of these variances and the proposed site use on land use, zoning and land use plans is best evaluated in an Environmental Impact Statement. 3. This "Limited" Business district was developed to allow commercial uses which were also not significant generators of traffic. It is expected that the redevelopment of this site would increase traffic generation rates beyond that of existing conditions in consideration of increased use and the proposed office. 4. All on-site sanitary disposal is currently managed by on-site underground sewage leaching systems. In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published the Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study). The 208 Study identified eight (8) hydrogeologic zones in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. These zones were distinguished based upon differences in underlying groundwater flow patterns and water quality. The subject site is located within SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which according to Article VI, has an allowable flow of 600 gallons per day (gpd) per acre. Therefore, the allowable nitrogen bearing flow for the site is 911 gpd. The sanitary design flow is computed using SCDHS manual Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other Than Single Family Residences. The manual establishes the design flow as follows: Restaurant 70 seats @ 10 gpd/seat kitchen (estimated) 700 gpd 1,400 gpd Office 0.06 gpd per SF building area 49 gpd . . Page 4 SEQR Positive Declaration - Hellenic Cabins June 28. 1999 Cabins 150 gpd per unit (20 units) 3,000 gpd TOTAL 5,149 gpd However, not all flow produces nitrogen, therefore the estimated flow produced by the restaurant kitchen can be removed from sanitary calculations, resulting in a flow rate that exceeds the SCDHS sanitary discharge by 312%. Regardless, the SCDHS approved the request for a waiver to allow the proposed project on September 3, 1998 stating only that the applicant must meet the requirements of the Office of Groundwater Resources with regard to water supply. The proposed project has the potential to cause a significant adverse groundwater impact as a result of increased nitrogen load over a sole source aquifier. Summarv The Draft Environmental Impact Statement should include relevant sections required under NYCRR 617.9, with detailed analysis of the following issues: . A hydrological study of the ground water conditions on-site, with additional discussion of the potential impacts to the groundwater. . Soil analysis . Traffic analysis . Land use and zoning analysis due to the large number of variances. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation - Albany & Stony Brook offices Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Dept. NYS Dept. of Transportation - Albany & Hauppauge offices Suffolk County Water Authority Applicant ENB . NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC ENVIRONMENTAL. PLANNING. CONSULTING CHARLES J. VOORHIS, CEP, AICP . ARTHUR J. KOERBER, PE. . VINCENT G. DONNELLY. PE . VICTOR BERT. P.E. . JOSEPH R. EP!FANIA, P.E.. ROBERT G. NELSON,JR, PE . CHRISTOPHER W ROBINSON, PE June 4, 1999 ~q JUN 0 7 1999 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 SQuthold, NY 11971 South old Town Planning Board Re: Hellenic Cabins, EAF Part I Review SCTM 1000-35-02-14 NP&V #99074 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As per your request, we have completed a review of the EAF Part I for the above-referenced application, which includes the demolition of 18 structures and construction of an office building and four two story framed cabins. There is an existing restaurant on site which will remain. The site is 2.2846 acre in size, which includes a 0.7658 acre parking area located to the east. The subject property has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The EAF Part I has been reviewed and amended as necessary and a Part II EAF checklist has been prepared by our office. As a number of questions in the EAF Part I were not answered, and several questions had been given responses which conflict with other responses, we have indicated where conflicting and/or missing information necessary to complete the review is required. A discussion of the project and an analysis of potential environmental issues are presented below. ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNlNG CONSIDERATIONS The project site is located on the north side of Main Road (NYS Rte. 25A), west of The Long Way and Main Road intersection, better known as 5145 Main Road, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The subject property can be more particularly described as SCTM number 1000-35- 02- 14 & 15. The property has approximately 409.87' of road frontage along Main Road (NYS Rte. 25A). The project site is entirely developed, with the only vegetation consisting of landscaping and maintained grass. The site does not contain wetlands or any additional known historically and ecologically significant resources. This review will discuss the proposed project and its potential impact on the lands resources. As previously stated, there are currently 19 structures that exist on site, including the existing restaurant. The structures consist of two (2) storage buildings, a shower structure, five (5) two unit cabins, nine (9) one unit cabins, and a two story frame house which contains two P"".l 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE, NY 11747-2'188 (5151427-5665 FAX (5151427-5820 . . Hellenic Cabins EAF Part I Review apartments. According to the topographic survey of the site provided by the applicant, there are a total of 19 cabin units, with an additional 2 apartment units within the 2 story structure. The applicant proposes to demolish these structures to allow for the construction of four (4) two story frame cabins containing a total of 20 units (2 containing 6 units & 2 containing 4 units). Additionally, the applicant proposes to construct an 811 SF office building. Access to the site will occur at two points along the properties road frontage, containing a semi-circular drive within. Twenty eight (28) additional parking stalls will be added along the access drive to accommodate the proposed structures, with additional paved walkways between the buildings, restaurant and office building. No construction/disturbance will occur within the 0.7658 acre leased parking area provided for the existing restaurant. The site is zoned "LB" Limited Business, which requires a minimum lot size of 80,000 SF, or just slightly less than 2 acres. Therefore, the site would meet the required lot size in total but does not meet minimum lot size requirements exclusive of the 0.7658 leased parking area. Maximum permitted lot coverage within the "LB" zoning district is equivalent to 20% of the lot area (1.519 acres), or an approximately 13,233 SF building footprint. Under existing conditions, the building coverage yields approximately 17% while under proposed conditions the lot coverage yields 22.6%. The minimum landscaped area allowed on site is 35%, or approximately 23,158 SF. Both existing and proposed conditions meet this zoning requirement. The current zoning allows a height of 2 Y, stories (35 feet), which conforms under both existing and proposed conditions. The site is an existing non-conforming use within the LB district. The proposed project requires the following variances: . Front yard setback for "Future Office" and Unit 1 . Side Yard Variance for Units 1 & 4 . Rear Yard Variance for Units 2, 3 & 4 ,; Minimum Lot Size Variance . Lot Coverage Variance . Expansion ofa Non-Conforming Use Variance The "LB" zoning district was developed to allow the construction of business uses along highways outside of the Central Business District. It was further intended that these uses would conform to the generally rural character of the surrounding areas, with emphasis placed on design. It should be noted that the present condition of the site is in an extremely deteriorated condition and does not conform to the character of the area. This "Limited" Business district was developed to allow commercial uses which were also not significant generators of traffic. It is expected that the redevelopment of this site would increase traffic generation rates beyond that of existing conditions in consideration of increased use and the proposed office. Land use in the vicinity is predominantly residential to the north and east, with a Golf and Country Club located adjacent to the sites north and west property boundary. South of the site and on the south side of Main Road, there are additional small business uses. Zoning in the vicinity is generally a reflection on the existing land use, Generally, R-80 zoning lies to the north, east and west of the site, with R-40 zoning to the south. Page 2 . . Hellenic Cabin. EAF Part I Review The site is relatively flat throughout, with all existing and proposed slopes of between 0-10%. The property does not contain any significant landforms or geological features. The entire site is developed, with pervious areas consisting of landscaping/turf. Haven Loam (HaA, 0-2% slopes) is the only soil type present on site. The Haven Loam series is described within the Suffolk County Soil Survey as land which is suitable for development, with good leaching potential. Although Haven soils with shallow slopes (0-2%) are not classified within groups 1-4 of the NYS Agricultural Land Classification System, they are fertile agricultural soils. There are no wetlands on site or adjacent to the property. Public water is supplied to the site by the Suffolk County Water Authority. There is a 10 inch main along the north side of Main Road (NYS Rte. 25A), with several fire hydrants in the vicinity. The Islands End Well Field & Pump Station is located adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site, with the nearest well within this particular well field located roughly 1,000 feet to the northeast of the parcel. It is estimated that the proposed project will utilize approximately 5,169 gallons of water per day. It is not anticipate that the proposed project will have a significant impact on water supply resources. All on site sanitary disposal is currently managed by on-site underground sewage leaching systems. In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published The Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study). The 208 Study identified eight (8) hydrogeologic zones in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. These zones were distinguished based upon differences in underlying groundwater flow patterns and water quality. The subject site is located within SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which according to Article IV, has an allowable flow of 600 gallons per day (gpd) per acre. Therefore, the allowable nitrogen bearing flow for the site is 911 gpd. The sanitary design flow is computed using SCDHS manual Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other Than Single Family Residences. The manual establishes the design flow as follows: Restaurant 70 seats @ 10 gpd/seat krtchen (estinnated) 700 gpd 1,400 gpd Office 0.06 gpd per SF building area 49 gpd Cabins 150 gpd per unit (20 units) 3,000 gpd TOTAL 5,149 gpd However, not all flow produces nitrogen, therefore the estimated flow produced by the restaurant kitchen can be removed from sanitary calculations, resulting in a flow of 3,749 gpd. The anticipated sanitary flow rate exceeds the SCDHS sanitary discharge by 312%. Regardless, the SCDHS approved the request for a waiver to allow the proposed project on September 3, 1998 stating only that the applicant must meet the requirements of the Office of Groundwater Resources with regard to water supply. Page 3 . . Hellenic Cabim EAF Part I Review The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site is roughly 3 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the 1997 SCDHS water table map. The topographic elevation on site ranges from approximately 21-27 feet above msl, not including the leased portion of the site. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 18 feet. The direction of groundwater flow is towards the south. The depth to groundwater on site is not expected to have constraints on the location of septic systems on the parcel. The applicant will install 3 conventional septic tanks on site. A standard, three pool septic system typically requires a minimum depth to groundwater of approximately 9 feet to allow adequate depth for leaching. It has been indicated by the SCDHS that soils are acceptable at a depth of three feet below the surface. SUMMARY In conclusion, the proposed project appears to be well-designed due to the clustering of the proposed structures. The applicant is proposing an additional cabin unit on site, however is demolishing the two story house which contains 2 apartment units. The site is currently not well maintained and does not conform to the character of the area. In order to make an informed decision on the proposed plan, the Town may wish to ask for an EAF Part III or a DEIS, which would include the following: . A hydrological study of the ground water conditions on-site, with additional discussion of the potential impacts to the groundwater. . Soil analysis . Traffic analysis . Land Use and zoning analysis due to the large number of variances In conjunction with the possible impacts to environmental resources, we believe that additional information is necessary to demonstrate that a "hard look" has been taken with regard to the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. This information will then be used as a basis for a determination of significance, or findings and a decision in the case of a DEIS. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, enc. EAF Parts I & II Page 4 n_L_ . . 6 NYCRR, ~ 617.21 (App. A) State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderly manner. whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently. there acc aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly. comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact, The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE-- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [~] Part 1 [ ] Part 2 [ ] Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [ ] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a negative declaration will be prepared. [ ] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the envirorunent, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in Part 3 have been required; therefore, a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' [ ] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a positive declaration will be prepared. '" A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Hellenic Cabins Name of Action .'./' . \';;'~~~;:;:.',}."".' .;' , ~... ~; i-. , ;'.,-, Southold Town Planning Board Name of Lead Agency f. I",., I, ; 'J (j ., ,~! .... Bennett Orlowski Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Chairman Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer C" t ~!Dutno'd TO\M!I Signature of Preparer (if different fronfilfsPoll~..t...1)ftic.w. ~ TYI'i'~J ~Gal Date PART I--PROJECT INFORMATiON Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review, Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts NYSBA ENV-l . - 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Hellenic Cabins LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 5145 Main Road Southold Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE John Giannaris 516-765-4330 ADDRESS c/o Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Southold, NY 11971 NAME OF OWNER (if different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCROIPTION OF ACTION Reconstruction of existin. cabins Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: 0 Urban 0 Industrial JIll Commercial o Rural (non-farm) 0 Forest 0 Agriculture .I!!l'Residential (suburban) o Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 1 II? pille:: lp~c;:pr1 p!llrlring .71\ APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings aod ot er paved surfac s Other (indicate type) (l~ liRA) U 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage 9'Well drained lDeJ o Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how 'JIany acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? ",vI t:;t....Acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? 0 Yes 5J'No oeres Z. 28</& ~L.. 1\( ILtf'l. PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres .JoloCres ~acres , .-14 , acres acres 0.<1 2- acres \."3 \" '-l & acres % of site o Moderately well drained % of site PAGE 2 NYSSA ENV-I . . a. What is depth to bedrock? ;1 It (in feet) / 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: I!!I"O-IO% 100 % 0 10-15% 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to 9l" contain a building, site, or district listed on the State or the National Register of Historic Places? 0 Yes l!fNo Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 0 Yes ~o What is the depth of the water table? / 7 (in feet) Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Ji Yes 0 No / Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? 0 Yes [il'No Does project site cOl)Iain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? o Yes l3'No According to Identify each species Are there any uniquy-or unusual land forms on the project site? (Le., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) DYes lYNo Describe % 7. 8. 9. 10. II. 12. 13. Is the project site prj:Oently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes Ii1fNo If yes, explain . 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? 0 Yes l2I'No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: I?Ont!.- a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: I? (> n.L a. Name b. Size (in acres) Is the site served by existing public utilities? !:Y'Yes 0 No /' a. If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? 19'Y~es 0 No b. If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Yes 0 No Is the site located in an agricultural di~rict certified pursuant to Agricultu e and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? 0 Yes l3'f.Io Is the site located in or substantially contiguo~to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? 0 Yes lil'No /' Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? 0 Yes I:!l"No 17. 18. 19. 20. B. Project Description 2.26 '18 I. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). ~ ~.J a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: ~acres.- b. Project acreage to be developed: .A;S" -.~res initially; ~ 'l acres u. Itimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: I? acres. _________'::.::> z, 28 Lf 8 d. Length of project, in miles: (;f .pprnpriate) A..' / IJ e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed: I 0 ~, n f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing . proposed 2.8 A cIA, II"~ ~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: <j ~ (upon completion of project) "It ~ ",-'tt QC~ h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: Co-llo,qe<> One Family Two Family Multiple Family Cvud"mmium Initially ZO U ".1$ Ultimately . ;l.o u ~ I _ L Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: d SVTH,'.Ih.eight; JS- width; ..s 1 length ~ Sif:l, ~ j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is ~ ft. Lfo9- fJ-r / (,uVS!'!(o&-fj ') 2. How much natural material (Le., rock, earth, etc.) will be remo)'t'd from the site? 0 tons/cubic yds 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? )!lYes 0 No IStN/ A J a. If yes, for what intended purpose is u!e ;ite being reclaimed? ;:IrU/i)~cAPIA.) 17. 1(.J,e~ b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? WYes 0 No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? liiPYes 0 No f) 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres /JdcL o d I \ Vol&JhhCm +- ( 'ola.",v,QC\"~ \ur~) NYS.'!':!:" O.7-i:J~6 [<,riSEP :?i~d ~ ~11<- CDu....., ""okra...#-r PAGE 3 . . 5. Will any mature f9Iest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes (l(No '-Y "II'< 6. If single-phase project: Anticipated period of construction: r months (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated: 1.. (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: 11- month '19 year (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: 1'. month 00 year LOf4U ... pDQI) tl.-p.." coeono"'\c. d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? DYes lSI'No Co hol.-kol\.S 8. Will blasting occur during construction? DYes e1/0 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction Zot. ; after project is complete If) ;!;. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project: 0 ./ II. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DYes S'No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? D Yes ~o a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount: b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged: 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~es D No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a loo-~ar flood plain? D Yes ~ 16. Will the project generate solid waste? tll'Yes D No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? fa. t)"?- tonsOO""""') /' b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? 8'Yes D No c. If yes, give name 'f>ovntOl.O . location c.an:Ho&-UE:. d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~es C(No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/mo!lili' '5 Q.I'>'{ b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years./ 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? D Yes t3'No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the loca ambient noise levels? 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use?(> Yes D No If yes, indicate type(s) e . -T. {1,' ~ .AJ fff'tJ tA L {,/1 S 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ,IV /14 gallonslminute 23. Total anticipated water usage: 51 ["9 gallons/day I /' 24. Does project involve local, state or federal funding? DYes l:3""No If Yes, explain 25. Approvals Required: :P(.lioJc .5a",~ DYes lSrlfo DYes lB1fo [!t'1(io DYes ~ DYes DYes DYes DYes ~ DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies ~~ ~~~~f:f A:pf~ GB 1),k plnh'L reCOn"NlJa- pl'!'o.; 16W~ Ct!Jo,it5 4[),",n\~ C. Zoning and Planning Information I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? If yes, indicate decision req~ed: D zoning amendment 19' zoning variance D special use permit ~ DNo D subdivision PAGE 4 NYS8A ENV-l . . ):!I site plan 0 new/revision of master plan 0 resource management plan 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? I.~ 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? c...oN\me.'e.I~ ~D l2eS,d~ '" Le, Yl a..,uo... uJ /ch 'rfu../d.1 (l /3/23.3 SF (.A'1. I~ aiU'.O-' 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? re~ ~ttbl '~lkhJ.'€) Cab.inc;. .A//4- I U other ;)0"/, 1M 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted (ocalland use plans? DYes ONo 'P..t'e""b~ 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/4-mile radius of proposed actio'l? ~. (!..o1'V\l'Y\U'u'o-l (CTclfleut.) C2u,1~'ec../l1 R..-00,IL-L/D 8. Is jIre proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within 1/4 mile? I!!fYes 0 No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N / .4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? A// II Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 0 Yes Ill1'fu Will the proposed a~n create a demand for any community-provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ~Yes 0 No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~es 0 No Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? 0 Yes ~ a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? 0 Yes 0 No 10. II. 12. D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification (certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. A.PPlicant/SP~_ ~A C. MOO/'Z..6 Date Slgnature~_ Title -5'-?T'O~/::;-y. a /si?, If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before . proceeding with this assessment. PAGE 5 NYSSA ENV-I . ~ HELLENIC SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION FOR 20 OCCUPIED ROOMS OF MOTEL 6-4-99 DRIVE AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT WAY RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 9.18 0.00 1. 00 184 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 0.26 0.00 1. 00 5 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 0.46 0.00 1. 00 9 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 0.73 0.00 1. 00 15 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 0.44 0.00 1. 00 9 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 0.39 0.00 1. 00 8 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 0.83 0.00 1. 00 17 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 8.23 0.00 1. 00 165 PK HR ENTER 0.70 0.00 1. 00 14 PK HR EXIT 0.85 0.00 1. 00 17 PK HR TOTAL 1. 55 0.00 1. 00 31 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 6.93 0.00 1. 00 139 PK HR ENTER 0.67 0.00 1. 00 13 PK HR EXIT 0.60 0.00 1. 00 12 PK HR TOTAL 1. 27 0.00 1. 00 25 Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available The above rates were calculated from these equations: 24 - Hr. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = .973LN(X) + 2.298, R~2 = .82 7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) = .897LN(X) + -.013 R~2 = .72 , .36 Enter, .64 Exit 4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: T = .532 (X) + 5.947 R~2 = .66 , .53 Enter, .47 Exit AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = .847LN(X) + .27 R~2 = .73 , .39 Enter, .61 Exit PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = .769LN(X) + .672 R~2 = .68 , .54 Enter, .46 Exit Sat. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) 1.025LN(X) + 2.033, R~2 = . 9 Sat. Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) .607LN(X) + 1.615 R~2 = .62 , .45 Enter, .55 Exit Sun. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = 1.008LN(X) + 1.912, R^2 = .84 Sun. Pk Hr. Total: T = .474 (X) + 15.939 R~2 = .78 , .53 Enter, .47 Exit Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS . (. SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION FOR .81 TH.GR.SQ.FT. OF SINGLE TENANT OFFICE AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 81. 87 0.00 1. 00 66 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 28.51 0.00 1. 00 23 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 3.52 0.00 1. 00 3 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 32.03 0.00 1. 00 26 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 6.92 0.00 1. 00 6 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 39.23 0.00 1. 00 32 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 46.16 0.00 1. 00 37 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0 PK HR ENTER 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0 PK HR EXIT 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0 PK HR TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0 PK HR ENTER 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0 PK HR EXIT 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0 PK HR TOTAL 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0 Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available The above rates were calculated from these equations: 24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = .601LN(X) + 4.321, R^2 = .52 7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: T = 1. 63 (X) + 24.623 R^2 .76 , .89 Enter, .11 Exit 4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: T = 1.497(X) + 36.174 R^2 = .77 , .15 Enter, .85 Exit AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: T = 1.63 (X) + 24.623 R^2 .76 , .89 Enter, .11 Exit PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: T = 1.497(X) + 36.174 R^2 = .77 , .15 Enter, .85 Exit Sat. 2-Way Volume: 0, R^2 = 0 Sat. Pk Hr. Total: 0 R^2 = 0 , 0 Enter, 0 Exit Sun. 2-Way Volume: 0, R^2 = 0 Sun. Pk Hr. Total: 0 R^2 = 0 , 0 Enter, 0 Exit Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS . . HELLENIC SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION CALCULATION FOR 70 SEATS OF HIGH TURNOVER (SIT-DOWN) RESTAURANT 6-4-99 AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 4.83 0.00 1. 00 338 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 0.24 0.00 1. 00 17 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 0.23 0.00 1. 00 16 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 0.47 0.70 1. 00 33 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 0.24 0.00 1. 00 17 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 0.18 0.00 1. 00 12 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 0.42 0.75 1. 00 29 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 6.21 0.00 1. 00 435 PK HR ENTER 0.51 0.00 1. 00 36 PK HR EXIT 0.37 0.00 1. 00 26 PK HR TOTAL 0.88 1. 07 1. 00 62 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 5.17 0.00 1. 00 362 PK HR ENTER 0.36 0.00 1. 00 25 PK HR EXIT 0.29 0.00 1. 00 20 PK HR TOTAL 0.65 0.86 1. 00 46 Note: A zero rate indicates no rate data available The above rates were calculated from these equations: 24-Hr. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = . 768LN (X) + 3.654, R^2 = .8 7-9 AM Peak Hr. Total: LN(T) = .797LN(X) + 1.558 R^2 = .83 , .88 Enter, .12 Exit 4-6 PM Peak Hr. Total: T ~ 1.121 (X) + 79.295 R^2 = .82 , .17 Enter, .83 Exit AM Gen Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = . 797LN (X) + 1.558 R^2 .83 , .88 Enter, .12 Exit PM Gen Pk Hr. Total: T = 1.121 (X) + 79.295 R^2 .82 , .17 Enter, .83 Exit Sat. 2-Way Volume: T = 2.136(X) + 18.473, R^2 = .66 Sat. Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) = .814LN(X) + - .115 R^2 = .59 , .54 Enter, .46 Exit Sun. 2-Way Volume: LN(T) = .863LN(X) + .306, R^2 = . 5 Sun. Pk Hr. Total: LN(T) .605LN(X) + -.228 R^2 = .56 , .58 Enter, .42 Exit Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS . . Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert envirorunental analyst. . Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in Part 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the state and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site, other examples andlor lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. . The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. . In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in Part 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question, check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact, consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to Part 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND I. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? . NO 0 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10 % . . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than three feet. . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. . Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage. . Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (I.e., rock or soil) per year. . Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. . Construction in a designated floodway. . Other impacts: 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) .NO DYES . Specific land forms: PAGE 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Proj ect Change 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo D D DYes ONo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 D DYes ONo 0 D DYes ONo o o DYes 0 No NYSBA ENV.I . j 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON WATER Impact Impact Project Change 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) .NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 0 . Developable area of site contains a protected water body. DYes DNo . Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of 0 0 DYes DNo a protected stream. 0 . Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected 0 DYes DNo water body. 0 0 . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. DYes DNo . Other impacts: 0 0 DYes DNo 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? .NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 . A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of 0 DYes DNo water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. . Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface 0 0 DYes DNo area. . Other impacts: 0 0 DYes DNo 5. WilI Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? DNa . YES Examples that would apply to column 2 . . Proposed Action wilI require a discharge permit. 0 DYes DNo . Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not 0 0 DYes DNo have approval to serve proposed (project) action. 0 . Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater 0 DYes DNo than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. 0 . Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water 0 DYes DNo supply system. . . Proposed Action wilI adversely affect groundwater. 0 DYes DNo . Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which 0 0 DYes DNo presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. 0 . Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per 0 DYes DNo day. . Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into 0 0 DYes DNo an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. . Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical 0 0 DYes DNo products greater than 1,100 gallons. . Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water 0 0 DYes DNo and/or sewer services. . Proposed Action locates commercial andlor industrial uses which 0 0 DYes DNo may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment andlor storage facilities. . Other impacts: 0 0 DYes DNo 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? .NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 0 0 DYes DNo PAGE 7 NYSBA ENV.I . e I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Im~act Im~act Project Change . Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. DYes ONo . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. 0 0 DYes ONo . Proposed Action will allow development in a designated 0 0 DYes ONo floodway. . Other impacts: 0 0 DYes ONo IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? .NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any 0 0 DYes ONo given hour. . Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton 0 0 DYes ONo of refuse per hour. . Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ibs. per hour or 0 0 DYes ONo a heat source producing more than 10 million BTUs per hour. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land 0 0 DYes ONo committed to industrial use. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial 0 0 DYes ONo development within existing industrial areas. . Other impacts: 0 0 DYes ONo IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? .NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or 0 0 DYes ONo federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. . Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. 0 0 DYes ONo . Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, 0 0 DYes ONo other than for agricultural purposes. . Other impacts: 0 0 DYes ONo 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? .NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or 0 0 DYes ONo migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. . Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of 0 0 DYes ONo mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? .NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to D D DYes DNo agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) PAGE 8 NYSSA ENV-l . tt I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Imljact Imljact Project Change 0 Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile DYes ONo of agricultural land. 0 0 0 The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 DYes ONo acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. 0 0 0 The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of DYes ONo agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g., cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). 0 Other impacts: 0 0 DYes ONo IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES II. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? . NO 0 YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 0 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different 0 0 DYes ONo from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. 0 Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of 0 0 DYes ONo aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. 0 Project components that will result in the elimination or 0 0 DYes ONo significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. 0 Other impacts: 0 0 DYes ONo IMPACT ON mSTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? . NO 0 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or 0 0 DYes DNo substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of Historic Places. 0 Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within 0 0 DYes ONo the project site. 0 Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for 0 0 DYes DNo archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. 0 Other impacts: 0 0 DYes ONo IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? .NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 0 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. 0 0 DYes DNo 0 A major reduction of an open space important to the community. 0 0 DYes DNo 0 Other impacts: 0 0 DYes DNo PAGE 9 NYSSA ENV-I . IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? DNO .YES . Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. '> Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. (foSS ~ \,\c. Other impacts: . . IMPACT ON ENERGY IS. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? . NO 0 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5 % increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. . Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? . NO 0 YES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. . Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). . Proposed' Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. . Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? .NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (Le., oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. . Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e., toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) . Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. . Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. PAGE 10 1 Small to Moderate Impact o . o o o o o o o o o o o o o . 2 Potential Large Impact o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change DYes DNo aYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes 0 No DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes.DNo DYes DNo DYes 0 No DYes DNo DYes DNo NYSSA ENV-I ~ - CuD.5 , 2blr 6.-<..u ~ " " V ~1S:L~f) PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ~ ft::> S/f:FF . . Tel: (516) 765-4330_' '~r;::::, R n 1\ n r~ Fax: (516)765-4643:~ lEi ~ LS U \::J LS :!I;--"--- ~ ' "\ niW 191999 Ii Ii '11\" ibl ret Rutkowski Secretary Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 C" ',t",;'~' ~"'~'I' ~'j'~,I,!i~/'/; lF~, '~,:t~.. .",_.,~ ~. <"'-'11'!- 'Hi, ",,",'"" tt',' '''I : :~,,:?, , tf !l,,' ;.,.;; i~..,::.,1l! " ..1~i,::?J ~; " ,;',~ MAY Z 0 199~ j TO\/I/'," ::5,,:;::, Re: Hellenic Snack Bar Cottages Dear Chairman and Board members: The Planning Board forwarded the lead coordination request on March 9, 1999, 30 days period has passed, and the applicant wishes to with the applications before your board. agency comment proceed The Zoning Board had recommended that we health department approval prior to continuation your board. In accordance with your recommendations, obtained approval to build the proposed units and to complete the approval process with the Town. obtain with we wish Please place this next available date. matter on the calender for your ~~ patricia C. Moore cc: Hellenic Cabins Anthony Salvati, Architect ..,-- . 1\ rE 'C: m 0 '0'!/ fS' r"\\,. S"~ II ~ ~ -= "" , ., f'6 I v APRI4'II999 Iii: 1ff2,/FtJ ~~.. Pn (<;1(i' n<;.J823 Telephone (516) 765.1802 Towo Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM ~i'~-;' '~'.7 -'o;';I)n~~ !'~ .., . , ~~~ \~L\ \fI ' " AI1R t.li $ TO: FROM: G, Goehringer, Chairman ZBA E. Forrester, Building Department~ / Southold Town Planning Board DATE: RE: April 21, 1999 Giannaris Notice of Disapproval Dec. 3, 1996(~'c C...k..~ ) SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 I have reviewed the subject application with the inspector who originally disapproved it and it is this departments determination that the subject property contained non-conforming buildings with non-conforming uses. The application indicates the removal of all these buildings and the erection of other non- '" conforming buildings with non-conforming uses on different locations. This is not a matter where a structure is to be demolished and another placed within it's footprint or exceeding the footprint to any degree, Thus the application was disapproved pursuant to Article III Section 1 00-243. In addition the proposed project's square footage, total number of units and number of rooms is increasing. As to the continuous use (or interruption thereof) that issue was not the basis for this disapproval. The information regarding the duration of use may best be addressed to the applicant. I have noticed the indication of a tennis court on the neighboring parcel. This was not included on the application for a building permit nor was the swimming pool or office structure. ;.;~ "' .. '/,<~BOARDMEMBERS . ~,., . ;" ," erard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Homing MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Hill '-~""'-~diill . Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTIfOLD Ed Forrester, Director of Enforcement/Building Dept. ZBA Chairman and Members March 30, 1999 Giannaris & Ors./December 3, 1996 Application to Building Dept. 1000-35-2-14 The applicant is requesting a variance based upon a December 12, 1996 Notice of Disapproval to "demolish and rebuild" nonconforming buildings, which formerly were cabin uses. Would you please forward a copy of the building permit application, cover letter and all other information from your application files for this property identified as 1000-35-2-14, in order that a full appellate review may be commenCed. Also, questions: which buildings contain nonconforming uses that were continuous (or lapsed within in a two-year period?) and what are the setback areas of nonconformity for that disapproval?" The Appeals Board is not authorized to consider the issue of other variances if they are not all cited in the Notice of Disapproval (basis of appeal). We are trying to process the application as smoothly as POssible and would like the application to be noticed with a full description of all areas which do not comply under Chapter 58 (when advertised). We appreciate your Cooperation. Enclosure (1996 N/D) CC: SEQRA Lead Agency (PB) P. Moore, Esq. (Applicant) i,. ': . FORM NO.3 . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL To Patricia C. Moore alc Giannaris & ors. .......-........................................... DATE: .~~~~~~~_]?_!??~__...____ 315 Westpbalia Rd. ................................................. Mattituck, N.Y. ]1952 .................................................... PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated p~~~KP~~_~...:__._._ 19?~_._. DEMOLISH AND RECONSTRUCT COTTAGES -. - - - - - - - - - -. -... -. - - - -. - -. -... -. - -. -. - - - - - - - - - -. -.. - - -. - -. - -. -.. at for permit to County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section .. .3.~. _. _ __ . 5145 MAIN ROAD EAST MARION, N.Y. Locat10n of Property . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ _ House No_ Street Hamlet 2 14 BLOCK . - . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ LOT .. _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . . Subdivision ..0.................................... Filed Map No. .... _. _ ..Lot No_ .... _ _. is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds _____..._..___________.._._._. NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS CONTAINING NON=CONFORMING USES SHALL NOT BE ENLARGED, ...................................................................................--..................... RECONSTRUCTED OR STRUCTURALLY ALTERED OR MOVED UNLESS THE USE OF SUCH BULLD-ING ...................................................................---.....--.................... IS CHANGED TO A CONFORMING USE. ...................................................--............--..................... ........... ACTION REQUIRED BY THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. ARTICLE XXIV ]00-243. ............................................................................................ ................................... ........................................................... .................................................................. ............................ ...................................................................................... ....... .............. ..................-............................................ ............... .................................................................................... ....... .'. ................ ............................................................................. .HH~JJ.PHHHH.H... BU~~.INSPECTOR GARY J. FISH " RV '/80 Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning . 5<)101' 13 Southold Town Hall l( K 53095 Main Road "- P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 O. APPEAUi BOARD MEMBERS. . MEMO BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD l'c// ; C] 71(. TO: FROM: DATE: SUB): Ed Forrester, Director of Enforcement/Building Dept. ZBA Chairman and Members March 30, 1999 Giannaris & Ors,fDecember 3,1996 Application to Building Dept. 1000-35-2-14 The applicant is requesting a variance based upon a December 12, 1996 Notice of Disapproval to "demolish and rebuild" nonconforming buildings, which formerly were cabin uses. Would you please forward a copy of the building permit application, cover letter and all other information from your application files for this property identified as 1000-35-2-14, in order that a full appellate review may be commenced. Also, questions: which buildings contain nonconforming uses that were continuous (or lapsed within in a two-year period?) and what are the setback areas of nonconformity for that disapproval?" The Appeals Board is not authorized to consider the issue of other variances if they are not all cited in the Notice of Disapproval (basis of appeal). We are trying to process the application as smoothly as possible and would like the application to be noticed with a full description of all areas which do not comply under Chapter 58 (when advertised). We appreciate your cooperation. I~wq HAR 31 19~ South old Town Planning Board ------ fOlIH NO. ) . TOlIN OF SOUTUOLD BUILDING IlEPARTHENT SOUTIIOJ.D. N. Y . . NonCE Of DISAPPROVAL DATE: .P~~~~~~r.!?,.!~~~........ To Patricia C. Moore ale Gianoaris & ors. ........................................ 315 Westphalia Rd. ........................................ Matti tuck, N.Y. 11952 ...........--....................... .... for pet'Oli t to PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your applicatiou dated jlr:~J>;tt!lr:!l.. ;l,..:... ... DEMOLISH AND RECONSTRUCT COTTAGES 19~~... . ................ ....... ..............................--..... at I.ocation of Property.. .5.1.4.5. .~.I.N. .RP.A.D....................... .E~.S!. MA~ION, N.Y. DOllse No. Street .. ". H~~i~~"". County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section " Xi...... _ BLOCK...2........ LOT 14 ............. Subdivision ................................ Filed Map No. ...........Lot No. ....... is returoed herewith aod disapproved 00 the following grounds ............................. NON-CONFORMING BUILDINGS CONTAINING NON~CONFORMING USKS SHALL NOT BE ENLARGED, ................................................................................................. RECONSTRUCTED OR STRUCTURALLY ALTERED OR MOVED UNLESS THE USE OF SUCH BULLDING . ....... ............................................... ....................... ....... IS CHANGED TO A CONFORMING USE. ....... .................................................... ......................... ............ . ...................... .......... ...................... ................................ ........... ACTION REQUIRED BY THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. ARTICLE XXIV 100-243. . ................. .........-....... .........................,.... ................................. . ......................... ............................................. ................................... .................................................................................................. ............... ..-....... . ............................. ................. ...... ...... .................. ...................... .............. ..................... .... ...... ........... ....... ...... ......... .............. ......... ....... ................ ..... ....A,f)p.............. BU~~.INSPECTOR GARY J. FISH " RV 1/80 d woo a. ;;i;~-i:. .. /1 WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD . PLANNING BOARD MEMB. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 9, 1999 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Hellenic Snack Bar Requested Action: Proposed reconstruction and expansion of existing cabins SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( X) Unlisted Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner (516) 765-1938 . . Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( X) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: The findings of the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services' Board of Review (8- 13-98) indicated that the proposal exceeds allowable equivalent density requirements by 312%. Variances are required for building setbacks and to expand the non-conforming use. Please feel free to contact this office for further information. ~u ~~ett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Board of Appeals BearE! af Trtfstsss Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany S~ffClII\ Cet:lF'lt:, D..partillant ef r'lbli" \"':Rrk.. U.S. Army Corp at Engineers New York State Department of Transportation TI,...,..I~... @)bul~k;, 51t3t1rJpull filuLlic Utilities Bavid Abale:lIi, 6,t:lt:l, ,po, I Villi:l9t:l Ad,"inistratar Suffolk County Water Authority PltrRldl7 (:. tnooRf.J liT To RrtEj "Maps are enclosed for your review rev. 4/94 . . facsimile TRANSMITTAL Fax#: tj-5- /,7 rlt) s.:>/"( P6 Pr d- UoRtJls l C jI frRLf5 Va 6/< ;+/S ) S- if 7- {)~/ 6 tI fi-/- 6/1/c C ff6'>//'';~ Date: To: Re: Pages: 3 (including cover) G f!12/<' I r '00/<' L./t. 0 1/ fc(JRUII~ i 'b./ / /iy I /1/11 5~/If)Ii1G jOq. If m/.4,O j5.(bn, rf/..t: Z; 13, ft. T l:> T IT ~ f!> tll.t- j) l/t C; f) 13 f r ..z; r 71IE (/3!) C ,1/i/107 .E ST /1 ~.Jli If /l . . g . 2: 6r/ T/ill(o t-( S U 513. r /IE 17ff.L ICr7l'iT IV ILL / t /-f/f'-"c To GftT T1 (j.sE Y;9~IIt:JlYcE ;r=~o~ WE 2/1./1 f)-. f PI/iii T 1111/1*:. ,/J.c tlSE ~of~L) tf IJ.s (.1P'E// 2::- t> rt T/ ;- / 1.1 0 .'\4 5 . I- fJ If tI r . c f ~Oltt TjJ-KI/iG: !;,TJ, I~ IJ) . ow Y"!/,fC /#/1--' !I/fu # :> D IE ref-. J11/~.tJ4Ilo'1 Do Ive From: t3 'lJ ~ . wjtL 'TI-h~ ftffCCTi6tl~ SouthokITOW~PlannlngBoard I 53095 Main Rd. d<f://le"vcJ.. <'>>srEGr:? P.O. Box 1179 r SouthokI. NY 11971 Phone: (516) 765-1938 Fax #: (516) 765-3136 ~ . . SL f Southold Town Hall I 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1197] ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-180S Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lara S. Collins George Homing AfPEAL6 BOARD MEMBERS MEMO BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ii . . "-/,F C7- ]/L TO: FROM: DATE: SUB): Ed Forrester, Director of Enforcement/Building Dept. ZBA Chairman and Members March 30, 1999 Giannaris & Ors./December 3,1996 Application to Building Dept. 1000-35-2-14 The applicant is requesting a variance based upon a December 12, 1996 Notice of Disapproval to "demolish and rebuild" nonconforming buildings, which formerly were cabin uses. Would you please forward a copy of the building permit application, cover letter and all other information from your application files for this property identified as 1000-35-2-14, in order that a full appellate review may be commenoed. Also, questions: which buildings contain nonconforming uses that were continuous (or lapsed within in a two-year period?) and what are the setback areas of nonconformity for that disapproval?" The Appeals Board is not authorized to consider the issue of other variances if they are not all cited in the Notice of Disapproval (basis of appeal). We are trying to process the application as smoothly as possible and would like the application to be noticed with a full description of all areas which do noT comply under Chapter 58 (when advertised). We appreciate your cooperation. I~ HAR 31 19~ Southold Town Planning Board / ;2.; . t'UKtt NO. J . -- TOliN OF SOUTUOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTIIOI.D, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL To Patricia C. Moore ale GiaDDaris & ors. .......................................... 315 Westphalia Rd. DATE: . P!'!'!'!'!>~L !?.. !~~~. . . Hattituck, II. Y. 11952 ...........--..............---........... ........................................... for permi t to PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your applicatiou dated )))':f::)':t1Jllllt.;J...:...... DEMOLISH AIID RECONSTRUCT COTTAGES 19~~.. . ............ .. .... .......... ..... ........... .............. "'" ....... at l.ocation of Property.. .5.1.4.5. .":^:I.ll. .R.O.A.D....................... .E~.S! MARIOII, II.Y. Douse No. Street _._....H~~i~~..._. County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section .. y~....... BLOCK.. .2..... ... LOT . .I~.......... Subdivision ................................. Filed Hap No. .........Lot No. ....... is returoed herewith aDd disapproved 00 the following grounds ........................ 1I01l-CONFORMIIIG BUILDIIIGS COIlTAlIIIIIG IlOtt.CONFORMING USES SHALL 1101' BE EllLARGED, ......................................................................................... RECOIISTRUCTED OR STRUCnJKALLY ALTERED OR HOVED UIlLESS TUE USE OF SUCH BULLDIIIG ...... ...--..........--...............................--................... ...........- IS CHANGED TO A CONFORMIIIG USE. .....--........................................................................ ....... ACTIOII REQUIRED BY THE ZOIlING BOARD OF APPEALS. ARTICLE XXIV 100-243. . ...-0................. ......................................... ...................... ........................... '-""" ....-......---.. '---"'0'-' -. .................. ..0 .........--............ .......................................... ..................... .............................................................. -............................. ............................... -- ......................--...... -'.. ...............-.-. .. ........................ ............. ...... ................. ........... ......-.. ... ... .... - .-..... ...... ......... ....................... ..................-.. -. .... -.. -~jJ '-/' .... .r. ~~~Z~ 'l~~"""""'" GARY .r. FISO ...... RY 1/80 .-.. -...-..._.. a'II c: .... ..........-.. .. ..-. /7 I . . ATTACHMENT Hellenic Snack Bar Other Planning Board Comments: Increase in non-conforming density Increase in traffic on State Road in East Marion. Establishes precedent for expanding non-conforming uses on non-conforming lot. Suffolk County Water Authority has a well field on the property to the east of applicants property. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETHL.EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD . PLANNING BOARD MEMB~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 8, 1999 Charles Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747-2189 RE: Environmental Review for Hellenic Cabins Route 25, East Marion SCTM* 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dear Mr. Voorhis, The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) for the above mentioned site plan to your office for review. Also enclosed are: 1. Copy of plan dated November 18, 1998. 2. Planning Board Resolution dated February 8, 1999. 3. Copy of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Board of Review determination and Planning Board's reply letter to the SCDHS Board of review. This site plan requires variances as follows: 1. Expand the non-conforming use on this non-conforming lot. 2. Front yard set back for office and unit number one.' 3. Side yard set back variances are required for units one and four. . . 4. Rear yard setbacks are required for units two, three and four. 5. Proposed expansion exceeds the 20% lot coverage. The applicant is stating in the LEAF that this application is to reconstruct existing cabins. However, the assessors records show sixteen (16) cabins, not the twenty the applicant shows on the LEAF. f Please submit your estimate of the review fee. rf you have any questions, please contact this office. Plan Reviewer Encls. cc: Gerard Goehringer, Chairman Board of Appeals Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement . ~ATRICIA C. MOO-= 51020 MAIN AOAD, SDUTHOLD. NY 11871 l51BJ 7S5-4SSD $UbP Pb ~;!..I-\\S " ;f~ ~ &/l41/U41&a~ -, OA1lc .3p179 U /M. .. .:.. /7 / ' ':jUD.J,::cr Il~ L-~ -<M/ft- fi1wC-1nt~ ~~fr.-m-' .. L -1 ~ 406/ r <e;. ,. 'i ' en,</u-;;.u/ ~J-- ed~ ~ ~,~,-~c- ~ /l-~ lm l' ~ had' -JU,ldd cuy~ ftat- ~ . ~f ~ u~ l/f I-f~d &7f ~ 4~ ~(tJ71 ~Ci.4-( ~4-f >ne.- ~ if 1-t~/c:/ AUt:.(> fo L~ ~J. /;:) S'G'~I"O cYJ- 6 NYCRR, ~ 617.21 (App. A) State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 aud Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: []Partl []Part2 []Part3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [ 1 A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a negative declaration will be prepared. [ 1 B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in Part 3 have been required; therefore, a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared. * [ 1 C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Hellenic Cabins Name of Action i;'" .~{? ~ , 'j ;f,,::~;f':, ... ~,..~,.""~~ ~~il Southold Town Planning Board Name of Lead Agency , i i , 'b. :F" Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Chairman Title of Responsible Officer C'....... t' vv(J .nold Tow Signature of Preparer (if different frorrl1tr414q~"-'Uj.ClJf} _ . , nr~ .....uar Bennett Orlowski Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Date PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts . . NYSBA ENV-! 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Hellenic Cabins LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 5145 Main Road Southold Suffolk Countv NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE John Giannaris 516-765-4330 ADDRESS c/o Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Southold, NY 11971 NAME OF OWNER (if different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCROIPTION OF ACTION Reconstruction of existing cabins Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: 0 Urban 0 Industrial 0 Conunercial o Rural (non-farm) 0 Forest 0 Agriculture o Residential (suburban) o Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 1 1 n plll<':: lp.~"prl p~rk-ing .7(; ~('res APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage 9'Well drained too o Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? 'cres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? 0 Yes ~o PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres ..3'-1 acres acres acres acres acres acres .. 1" acres acres % of site o Moderately well drained % of site . PAGE 2 . NYSBA ENV-l a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) / 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 1!!l'0-1O% 100 % 0 10-15 % 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to 9l' contain a building, site, or district listed on the State or the National Register of Historic Places? 0 Y es ~No Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 0 Y es ~o What is the depth of the water table? I 7 (in feet) Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 0 Yes 0 No / Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? 0 Y es ~o Does project site cOI!l"in any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes Gl'No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any uniquy-or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) o Yes !:!'No Describe % 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 13. Is the project site pr9'ently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes Ii1I'No If yes, explain . 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? 0 Yes !<!'No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: r10n~ a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: r10 "-L a. Name b. Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~ es 0 No ./' a. If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? 19'Yes 0 No b. If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? 0 Yes 0 No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? 0 Yes 13110 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguo~to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? 0 Yes ~o ./' 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? 0 Yes 19'No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriatet T.,fc:.,../ a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: .2. acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: I.~ acres initially; 1--6' acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: acres. d. Length of project, in miles: M 'pprnpriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed: I D % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing . proposed 2B g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: C ~qe,S One Family Two Family Multiple Family Cuudum;'I!imn Initially ZO Unl~ Ultimately ,;)..0 u~ l. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is '100 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be remoyed from the site? 0 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? 0 Yes 0 No IS1N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 0 Yes 0 No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 0 Yes 0 No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? -78 ~d ~ ~I"- ~""+:J \Vo:Iu~ length ~ Sif::l, Fw tons/cubic yds o acres Add V <.9IIo.hOn +- e.;f{c.- . PAGE 3 . NYSBA ENV-] 5. Will any mature f9'est (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes (g'No 6. If single-phase project: Anticipated period of construction: 11- months (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated: '2.. (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I: 1"2- month '1'1 year (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year lOf4U oj- pOD I) ~..... eC,of1c""\" d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? DYes lSrNo ~ h,h-ho~ Will blasting occur during construction? DYes ~o Number of jobs generated: during construction Zur- ; after project is complete Number of jobs eliminated by this project: 0 /' Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DYes l3'No If yes, explain 8. 9. 10. 11. Lot 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? D Yes ~o a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount: b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged: 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~ es D No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain :p(,,,A.lc 5"'nd~ DYes 19110 IS. Is project or any portion of project located in a lOO-J:j'ar flood plain? D Yes ~ 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [If'Yes D No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? tons cp""",-) / b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? B'Yes D No c. If yes, give name 51>vntOLD . location (!'()~&-llE:. d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~ es D No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month S Q,II^{ b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years /' 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes [3'No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the 10c<Jl.ambient noise levels? 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? E(Yes D No If yes, indicate type(s) e-lec.-H''''*1' 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated water usage: gallons/day 24. Does project involve local, state or federal funding? If Yes, explain 25. Approvals Required: DYes l3"N'0 l!"'&o DYes ~ gallons/minute DYes ~ City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies ~ Type Submittal Date ~~ jQ'l1/QB Iqq7!qA Aff fIfY"Uil GB DYes DYes DYes DYes DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo DNo t)\K. plant... reCDn~N,,(:r p......A 1.51-r~ WIn, '5an\~ C. Zoning and Planning Information I. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? If yes, indicate decision req~ed: D zoning amendment 19' zoning variance D special use permit . ~ DNo D subdivision PAGE 4 . NYSBA ENV-! o site plan 0 new/revision of master plan 0 resource management plan 0 other 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? r.e, 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? C-omme.'''-le4 ~O l2e-S,d~ U4eD ~ Le, 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Y'e CUI !'IfMuc.J ~ ll:.l-vntj Cab, /).So tJ/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? DYes 0 No 'P,.t'~I'-I:;~ 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 114-mile radius of proposed action? ~. c.-om lYlc:4'C-\.-o-I (lrclf leur.) eu.,~Q.p 8. Is JIrt: proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within 1/4 mile? I!fYes 0 No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N / .4 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 0 Yes IlJ1ilo 11. Will the proposed aSlion create a demand for any community-provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ~Yes 0 No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ElrYes 0 No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? 0 Yes rEt110 a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? 0 Yes 0 No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. APPlicant/sp~-/ ~ A C. /YJOO/Z.6 Date Slgnature~_ Title 47T012-Ni=;Y, 3/5/7'1 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. . PAGE 5 . NYSBA ENY.! WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCIDE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD . PLANNING BOARD MEMBEA BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box II79 Southold, New York II97I Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 24, 1999 Patricia C. Moore, Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Amended Site Plan for Hellenic Cabins Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 Zoning District Limited Business (LB) Dear Ms. Moore, As you know, the Planning Board has started the Coordinated Environmental Review on the above project. In consultation with the Towns Environmental Consultant, is was determined that the submitted Short Environmental Assessment Form (SEAF) does not contain sufficient information for analysis and determination. In addition, the form is out of date, as the land shown as leased from the Village of Greenport is now owned by the Suffolk County Water Authority. A Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) will be required for this project. For your convenience we enclosed a LEAF. Please complete this form as soon as possible so that we may continue with the Coordinated Review. . . The Board has requested a cost estimate from their Environmental Consultant for a review of the LEAF. You will be notified of the review fee when we hear from our consultant. The fee must be paid in full before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please z::;/ ~~a: Ka~~ Site Plan Reviewer cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement .. . S-_l~ ~,fO " JtJMvli )()w){11ff~ . f01c:L . -- So v~n )~ 70v.)Y/ of1Y ~l-s- K ~ I' ::;j() h If G--~ n Y) f-\ Y j' ! '~~ V l(.~ 1 T\:l b ~ i I J.. R d-O LCn;T k~n. ( 0 N ex l'~ T.'y)G- r:YOF'j o p /. S- L A CX''<--s ~o '-- It -r~J n,.2S; EJ%T~JI!1 fjY'IOIV' R-o p-vY'Gl"l> A[ w h 'vb ~ ~ hAS W Ye ~ )J b~,' rl Ii~ J-f~I/Q/V)i CS'YJAJ< BdJY-t-k'Q~J&V ~T A-i th~Tin-)~ 0 t- ~YY)plJ;'un ~1- sf}/~ of- n~ Rbov~ ~r<:J~LbJ ~ 8'((JwY) +' W,' p'l..., .L f1 >.(" YA-J'ry€... 'J 0 J1v-. GJ/ I? Y) ~'ol~ J ~ u./ r.,.-s i6IJ h} fin 1?YC:>vJ>f; A .L;A-~)~'2- )V E:.- (' s- h b 0 -y -+- ~;if Y)d ..,- ~}[ r---h Q.. ]) {;l9-.Ld T c;::; 1:~J:.~T::,,:o,?J~'f~~~~:"'1 ~-Vno If Kt f/(SY}.,& a )(lj " )./Q k: ~ €...JO ~Y'K.'YJ 6- A Ie 'A- of o. '1~ C- ~ ,. s a Wh~ J,)j::bl(Jl/tv~ by Sl./h #( COV~~ W (:) T ~ ~ I-rfh cn-;/y J t-()'{ J..{ b) TIJ"<.. vtI!(Yc;'~. d f 6-.e0>np'tJ~ ~'h (-j dJ,;ti- ~ f~J(/~D G- ; T ; J L[' S ~ J fo r r::; 19-Y'bl9 ~ Y--e c- -t p T;<)~ RYl cl ;-1JCL P ~lG' Y)G-{hm~-r~ c F c::L 70 t Boy;; n ~~~~ d= As T Jl1 J9;y-) UYJ; }/~" / ! 9..3f <(-7'7- (.l.<J I - rr ~ I Southold Town Planning Board _, ~t_ . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK . f'b ;I1S -<K v.s (j ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CLARE B. BRADLEY, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER February 11, 1999 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Subject: CI0-97-0012, Hellenic Snack Bar, (T) Southold; SCTM 1000-35-2-14. Dr. Clare Bradley has asked me to reply to your letter ofJanuary 26, 1999, regarding the Board of Review determination for the subject project. Decisions of the Board are based upon many factors, including in this case, what was the existing use of the facility. The record of the hearing indicates that the existing use was provided to the Board members, therefore, the Board decision was based upon disclosure of the facts. Like any administrative forum where a decision must be made, the outcome may not satisfy all the patties who have an interest in the case. Under the administrative procedures of the Sanitary Code, once the Board of Review determination is issued, it becomes a fmal document not subject to change. However, the issuance of fmal project approval by the Department is, of course, subject to the applicant obtaining all necessary town approvals. In this case, the department approval is subject to obtaining town SEQRA determination and necessary ZBA and/or Planning Board approvals. Please feel free to contact me should you like to discuss the matter further. Very truly yours, ~'N\.~ Dennis Moran, P.E. Chief Engineer DM/lr cc Clare B. Bradley, M.D., M.P.H. Joseph H. Baier, P.E. BOR File-Riverhead Royal R. Reynolds, P.E. '.1)J~a.'W~~ m1. ~t~~ ~t.tj 11) 1999 Southold Town Planning Board WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBEe BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 9, 1999 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Hellenic Cabins SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 8, 1999: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, 6)~{}~)~ Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCillE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 SouthoJd, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765.1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 26, 1999 Clare B. Bradley, M.D., M.P.H. Acting Commissioner of Health Services 225 Rabro Drive Hauppague, NY 11788 RE: Board of Review Reference # CI0-97-12 Hearing Date August 13, 1998 Hellenic Snack Bar nls Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dear Ms. Bradley, The Planning Board has received a copy of the Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Department of Health Review Board regarding the above proposed business expansion. A copy of this Report is attached for your convenience. In reviewing the findings and facts in the report, this Board would like to comment as follows: 1. Item number nine mentions the reconstruction of 20 cabins. Both the property records in the assessors office and an inspection by the Town's Zoning Board of Appeals show 16 existing cabins. The total square footage of the existing cabins is 4,952 square feet. The total square footage of the proposed twenty (20) cabins is 10,000 square feet, a one hundred percent increase. 2. Item number 10 indicates the applicant is saying that the existing use is more intensive than the proposed, from a sanitary discharge standpoint. Yet, the record shows that the restaurant is going from a seasonal paper service to a full service year-round use. And, the cabins are increasing in number from 16 to 20. Altogether, the proposal exceeds the allowable equivalent density requirements by 312%. . . In addition, the Town's minimum allowable percentage of lot coverage will be exceeded by 2.5%. 3. The Suffolk County Water Authority has a well field on the property adjoining this expansion project. Has the Water Authority been coordinated on this project and has the increase in the sanitary flow in the direction of the well field been considered in your determination. This proposal is not just an expansion of an existing use, it is a clear expansion of a presently non-conforming use. The Planning Board does not favor this expansion, and questions the Board of Review's action in approving the expansion before any local coordinated SEQRA review of same and without any local input. Encls. cc: Joseph Baier, Director of Environmental Quality .... . . "\ I I. . { ), " ( f 'I r 'I ( .: 'I~';. ~ ;. I ',. I'" 'J. . I . - < l, I .., '. . .,' '. mr. .:\' ~ : :j":\ '/ ,. .. :'H-~'."' '. 'l ~.. .,' Article 2, Section 220, Suffolk County Sanitary Code ------ To: Clare B. Bradley, M.D., M.P.H. Acting Commissioner of Health Services From: James C. Maloney, P.E., Chairman, Board of Review Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: CI0-97-12, Hellenic Snack Bar, nls Main Road, East Marian, (t) Southold; SCTM: 1000-35-2-14 and 15.1 '. ------ I J \ A-pplicant: Mr. John Giannasis The Hellenu: Snack Bar 5145 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939 'I Notice of Hearin~: July 27, 1998 Hearine Date: August 13, 1998 Statement of Probkm The proposed construction of 20 cottage units and an office building, which are to be utilized together with an existing restaurant, exceeds allowable equivalent density. In addition, the applicant wishes to convert the restaurant from single-service to full-service. Findin\;s and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 1.52 acre parcel. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone /lrv. 3. Area is zoned limited business. 4. Public water is available from Suffolk County Water Authority. 5. Depth to groundwater is greater than seventeen feet. . Hearing Date: August 13, 1998 BOR Decision/Page Two 6. Soils ~re acceptable at a depth of three feet below the surface. 7. Distance to nearest public water supply well is approximately 1.000 feet. Groundwater flow is to the south. 8. Proposal exceeds allowable equivalent density requirements by 312%. 9. The proposal entails the operation of an existing 70-seat restaurant (700 gallons-per-day (GPD) of sanitary flow). demolition and reconstruction of 20 cabins (3,000 GPO), demolition of a house with two existing apartmenu and construction of an 810 square foot office (49 GPO). 10. The applicant is indicating that the existing use is more intensive than that proposed from a sanitary discharge standpoint. 11. There was a previous Board of Review decision with regard to the subjec: site. A hearing was held on April 12. 1985 in response to a request for a variance from density standards to expand an existing restaurant. A variance was granted based on the facts that the restaurant is seasonal only and will remain seasonal. the operation was paper service and will continue in that manner. the applicant will upgrade the septic system to serve the c~ntire site and to meet existing standards at the time of Board of Review approval. 12. The Office of Groundwater Resources is reviewing the proposed water supply.system. 13. The allowable sewage flow is 912 gallons-per-day (GPD). A sewage flow of 3.758 GPO is proposed with a kitchen flow of 1.420 GPO. 14. The existing restaurant was approved at 1.800 GPO. The acreage has de,:reased from the time of the previous submittal to the Board of Review. 15. The site had an approved temporary residence permit for 14 residence units; however. asile survey presented by the applicant's representative indicated the presence of 20 units. Applicant is asserting that the 20 units existed in 14 buildings and an addidonal residential structure. 16. Planning and Zoning Boards have not made a determination on the project and are awaiting departmental determination. 17. Applicant is requesting permission to operate a full-service restaurant. k -- . . - . '" -..,,-----. - __u_ _100'!Jl7."Z2~-'- Ht!arlng Date: Augus~ Z3. Z998 BOR Decision/Page Three .-.., ~ D " etennmatlOn By a Vote of 2 to 1, the Board determined to approve the request for a waiver to allow the construction of 20 cottage units, the construction of 810 square feet of office space and the operation of a full-service restaurallt serving a maximum of 70 seats. The applicant must meet the requirements of the Office of Groundwater Resources with regard to water supply. ~/98 Date ~. /~/.2fl.... / t.A tJt..-J es C. Maloney, P.E., C' man WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. JR. RICHARD G. WARD . Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD MEMBd BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. Chairman PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 22, 1998 Patricia C. Moore, Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Amended Site Plan for Hellenic Cabins Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 Zoning District Limited Business (LB) Dear Ms. Moore, '. This letter will confirm our discussions at the Planning Board's work session on Monday December 21, 1998, regarding the above project. As discussed, the following changes/additions must be made before the Board can continue with it's review: 1. Materials and samples for the cabins and proposed office must be provided for review by the Architectural Review Board. 2. Floor plans showing square footage of each unit. 3. Outdoor lighting, including type fixture and wattage. 4. Lighting plan. 5. Sign Sketch to scale showing materials and color. 6. Transitional buffers. 7. Twenty five foot front yard landscaped area and five foot landscaped area in front of all buildings. 8. Parking requirements and proposed location of same. If offsite, please provide a copy of the lease. . . 9. Site details for proposed swimming pool. 10. Elevations and material samples of the proposed office building. In addition to the above, variances are required to expand the non-conforming use on this non-conforming lot. Front yard set back variances are required for the future office and motel unit number one. Side yard set back variances are required for units one and four. Rear yard setbacks are required for units two, three and four. In addition, the lot coverage exceeds the allowable twenty percent. A Suffolk County Department of Health Services stamp of approval must be on the final plan and a permit is required from the New York State Department of Transportation. As this is an amended plan, the fee calculation is $150 plus .025 times the total square footage of all structures proposed to be altered, expanded, or added. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. C?Jldj(~ cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement 12/16/1998 16:46 51b7.b43 LAW OFFICES4liORE PAGE 01 ~ /6 f-I< PATRICIA C. MOORE AlIcnley at Law S 1020 Main RoM Soutbold. Ntlw Yark 11971 Tal, (516) 765-4330 Fax: (SI6) 76S-4643 MlI'preI R.ulkowIId SccretIry Declllllber 16, 1998, Bennett Orlowski, Jr., chairman Southold Town Planninq Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Bob Kasner !~~.:0C:f~aW~MIJ11 L,. IJ " ~~iil DEe 1 7 199~ . Re: Hellenic Snack Bar and cottaqe. Southold Town Planning Board Dear Bob: In accordance with our telephone conversation, I have reviewed the Health Department decision, the Health Department doe. not limit the proposed project to "seasonal Ulle", th.: Health Department approved the development of the site as shown on the site plan. The Health Department did not restrict the u.e of the cottaqes or restaurant to seasonal use. (The Health Department merely referred to a prior decision as to the restaurant qranted in 1985) The sanitary flow calculations submitted by Younq & Younq and waiver qranted by the Health Department Board of Review provided for year round use. Enclosed is a letter from Youn9 & Younq conflrminq this faot. As a practical matter, the winter monthS are qenerally quiet in southold and Hellenic Restaurant has traditionally olosed for a winter break. However, with the development of the Health Care facility at Breaknock Hall, the future needs for lodqinq in Southold may Change. The cottages will be equipped for year round use and the applicant does not wish to limit this significant investment to a seasonal use. If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. ae l~ Y%S, ($~L~ rieia C. Moore 12/16/1998 16:46 5167654543 ~.~ ~~~ ,..~,... - LAl,.,l OFFICES f'.'100RE PAGE 1-:12 YOu~~ & a.:, F'AG( 82 t .... YOUNC II VOQNC P\lInq li.....llC'......."""'1 400 0.... .~.. Rww,,- ..;. "lilt U$Ol T,~ISI61721.U09 '...""..11>161 121-01U. IIOW'- W. 't'OIlIII. """.,... T\IOlIAtc.~,f'liJj. I ....... "'MnI',"_, ~.'""'- JOIIlI....-. Liool."""-'- ~""""t ~ VIA FAX' 'REGULAR MAll December 16, 1998 PatHClaC.Moore,ESQ. 5 1020~1i"0ld SOUthQ!d,New Vorl<U971 ~q DEe 17 1998 RE: Hf!~LeNIC$lilACK BAR .u.at M.f1Cll'!, 'T/O Southold, New Vork (97-0382) South old Town Planning Board Dear Mi. MQore: Pie... beadvlsedti'lat the proposed conflguration of water supply and sew,gedlsposal facilities, as depleted on the Site Plan last dated Novem~r 18, 1997, have been designed to seNe the existing restaurant, proposed catltns, and future office on a year round baSis. Based on a review ofthe testimony presented at the August 13, 1998, Suffolk .County cepartm.nt of Health SeNlces Board of Review Hearing and .theSuff~lk County Pe"'~rtment of Health Services Report of Flndil'lgs and Recommendations d.ted September 3, 1998, we have determined that the -f'< BO.rd otR.evlew granted our request for approval to construct water supply and sewage41spQsel systems In conjunction with the operation of ZI full- service restaurant and occupanc:y 01' 20 cabins and office building ,:)n a year rou IJdbll.I.. lfvou have any addItIonal questions regarding this matter, 1)leaSe do not heSltit. to contect UI. Very truly yours, ,,--.t ' ,;' I I A...{..I"\.\..... ~'l \~- \,,-, ~JC\;), t d Tnomes C. Wolpert, P.E. TCW~j0 . . 5ul,i' f~ !<.,K PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (516) 765-4330 Fax: (516) 765-4643 December 14, 1998 BY HAND Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 che4.- if\. ~~ Re: Hellenic Cabins Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Enclosed please find site plan for cabins, site plan contains sheets 1 - 4 and is the plan submitted to the Health Department. Also enclosed is the Health Department variance granted for reconstruction of cabins. Simultaneously with this submission we have forwarded this site plan to the Zoning Board. ours, Moore PCM/mr Encls. ~~q Southold Town Planning Board . . SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUAliTY Article 2, Section 220, Suffolk County Sanitary Code To: Clare B. Bradley, M.D., M.P:H. Acting Commissioner of Health Services From: James C. Maloney, P.E., Chairman, Board of Review Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: C10-97-12, Hellenic Snack Bar, n/s Main Road, East Marion, (t) Southold; SCTM: 1000-35-2-14 and 15.1 Applicant: Mr. John Giannasis The Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939 Notice of Hearing: July 27, 1998 Hearing Date: August 13, 1998 Statement of Problem The proposed construction of 20 cottage units and an office building, which are to be utilized together with an existing restaurant, exceeds allowable equivalent density. In addition, the applicant wishes to convert the restaurant from single-service to full-service. Findings and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 1.52 acre parcel. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone #N. 3. Area is zoned limited business. 4. Public water is available from Suffolk County Water Authority. 5. Depth to groundwater is greater than seventeen feet. .~~ , . . Reference Number: C10.97.12 Hearing Date: August 13, 1998 BOR Decision/Page Two 6. Soils are a,cceptable at a depth of three feet below the surface. 7. Distance to nearest public water supply.yvell is approximately 1,000 feet. Groundwater flow is to the south. /8. Proposal exceeds allowable equivalent density requirements by 312%. 9. The proposal entails the operation of an existing 70-seat restaurant (700 gallons-per-day (GPD) of sanitary flow), demolition and reconstruction of 20 cabins (3,000 GPD), demolition of a house with two existing apartments and construction of an 810 square foot office (49 GPD). 10. The applicant is indicating that the existing use is more intensive than that proposed from a sanitary discharge standpoint. 11. There was a previous Board of Review decision with regard to the subject site. A hearing was held on April 12, 1985 in response to a request for a variance from density standards to expand an existing restaurant. A variance was granted based on the facts that the restaurant is seasonal only and will remain seasonal, the operation was paper service and will continue in that manner, the applicant will upgrade the septic system to serve the entire site and to meet existing standards at the time of Board of Review approval. 12. The Office of Groundwater Resources is reviewing the proposed water supply system. 13. The allowable sewage flow is 912 gallons-per-day (GPD). A sewage flow of 3,758 GPD is proposed with a kitchen flow of 1,420 GPD. 14. The existing restaurant was approved at 1,800 GPD. The acreage has decreased from the time of the previous submittal to the Board of Review. 15. The site had an approved temporary residence permit for 14 residence units; however, a site survey presented by the applicant's representative indicated the presence of 20 units. Applicant is asserting that the 20 units existed in 14 buildings and an additional residential structure. 16. Planning and Zoning Boards have not made a determination on the project and are awaiting departmental determination. 17. Applicant is requesting permission to operate a full-service restaurant. . . Reference Number: C10-97-12 Hearing Date: August 13, 1998 BOR Dedsion/Page Three Determination By a vote of 2 to 1, the Board determined to approve the request for a waiver to allow the construction of 20 cottage units, the construction of 810 square feet of office space and the operation of a full-service restaurant serving ~ maximum of 70 seats. The applicant must meet the requirements of the Office of Groundwater Resources with regard to water supply. .o/1ps Date t&6 12/08/98 TUE 10:08 FAX 85425U5 ~UUl . . ~ P6 RK/ F A)( TRANSMISSION" SUFFOLK COUKTY DEP ARTi\lEKT OF HEALTH SERVICES OF'FICE OF" POLLUTION CONTROL I 5 HORSEBLOCK PLACE Ff_RMINOVIL.LE. NEW YORK I 1738 FAx, 5 I 6.854.2505 " To: .thg" frA..sS/J6te:- D:lte: /'y{'f"l//a:k~ 8, 1~fi1<5 Faxil: 7wS-U3~ Pnges: 5"" including this cover sheet. From: J~n /7,}""l..c."-J~:"Y I' Phone iI: 85""4 - z -:;- Z? ". Subject: /;t[LL€-.r-/ ( C JN4-UL SA ~.. COMMENTS: 12/08/98 TVE 10:09 FAX 8542505 ~uu. . . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (i ROBE:AT J. GAFFNE:Y SUFFOLK COUNTY ExECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF' HEAL1l-I SERVICES CLARE B. BI'lAOLE:Y. M.D.. M.P.H. ACTING COMMISSIONER September 3, 1998 Mr. John Giannasis The Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939 Subject: C10-97-12, Hellenic Snack Bar, n/s Main Road, East Marion, (t) Southold; SCTM: 1000-35-2-14 and 15.1 Dear Mr. Giannasis: Enclosed is a copy of the Board of Review's findings, recommendations and determination concerning the subject application. Based on the information submitted, the Board granted the request for variance with the provisions indicated in the determination. The granting of this waiver does not imply'that your application will be automatically approved. It is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete; otherwise, your approval will be subject to unnecessary delay. a truly yours, .~~ 't/~ sC. ~oney,p~ Chairman Board of Review jcm.kcn enclosure. cc: Board of Review - Riverhead James Bagg Patricia C. Moore, Esq. Young and Young Royal R. Reynolds, P.E. ~ $\?>t\\t1i~M mWn fFJ~~ ~m alO<U<<! 0/ Il6"",:.", - 15 ~01<Sttlodc t&f'k"", <.S'la-u;~, 8r1l/ 11738 -t&f'k.ne (51o)85~-25t.9 - tS21;"., (51o)85U505 12/08/98 TUF. 10:09 FAX 8542505 IgJUUJ . . SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Article 2, Section 220, Suffolk County Sanitary Code To: Clare B. Bradley, M.D., M.P.H. Acting Commissioner of Health Services From: James C. Maloney, P.E., Chairman, Board of Review Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: C10-97-12, Hellenic Snack Bar, n/s Main Road, East MariDn, (t) Southold; SCTM: 1000-35-2-14 and 15.1 Applicant: Mr. John Giannasis The Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939 Notice of Hearing: July 27, 1998 Hearine: Date: August 13, 1998 Statement of Problem The proposed construction of 20 cottage units and an office building, which are to be utilized together with an existing restaurant, exceeds allowable equivalent density. In addition, the applicant wishes to convert the restaurant from single-service to full-service. Findings and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 1.52 acre parcel. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone DIY. 3. Area is zoned limited business. 4. Public water is available from Suffolk County Water Authority. 5. Depth to groundwater is greater than seventeen feet. 12/08/98 TilE 10: 10 FAX 8542505 If:!:J uu"t . . Reference Number: C10-97-12 Hearing Date: August 13,1998 BOR Decision/Page Two 6. Soils ~re acceptable at a depth of three feet below the surface. 7. Distance to nearest public water supply well is approximately 1,000 feet. Groundwater flow is to the south. 8. Proposal exceeds allowable equivalent density requirements by 312%. 9. The proposal entails the operation of an existing 70-seat restaurant (70Cl gallons-per-day (GPD) of sanitary flow), demolition and reconstruction of 20 cabins (3,000 GPD), demolition of a house with two existing apartments and construction of all 810 square foot office (49 GPD). 10. The applicant is indicating that the existing use is more intensive than that proposed from a sanitary discharge standpoint. 11. There was a previous Board of Review decision with regard to the subjec site. A hearing was held on April 12, 1985 in response to a request for a variance from density standards to expand an existing restaurant. A variance was granted based on the facts that the restaurant is seasonal only and will remain seasonal, the operation was paper service and will continue in that manner, the applicant will upgrade the septic system to serve the entire site and to meet existing standards at the time of Board of Review approval. 12. The Office of Groundwater Resources is reviewing the proposed water supply.system. 13. The allowable sewage flow is 912 gallons-per-day (GPD). A sewage flow of 3,758 GPD is proposed with a kitchen flow of 1,420 GPD. 14. The existing restaurant was approved at 1,800 GPD. The acreage has decreased from the time of the previous submittal to the Board of Review. 15. The site had an approved temporary residence permit for 14 residence units; however, a site survey presented by the applicant's representative indicated the presence of 20 units. Applicant is asserting that the 20 units existed in 14 buildings and an addidonal residential structure. 16. Planning and Zoning Boards have not made a determination on the project and are awaiting departmental determination. 17. Applicant is requesting permission to operate a full-service restaurant. 12/08/98 Tl'E 10: 10 FAX 8542505 l(lJ uu;> . . Reference Number: C10-97-12 Hearing Date: August 13, 1998 BOR Decision/Page Three Determination By a vote of 2 to 1, the Board determined to approve the request for a waiver to allow the construction of 20 cottage units, the construction of 810 square feet of office space and the operation of a full-service restaurant serving a maximum of 70 seats. The applicant must meet the requirements of the Office of Groundwater Resources with regard to warer supply. ~/i~ Date - U~7 t&6 Maloney, P.E., c~ Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning . 5v-lif ('/? I'?/C. Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (516) 765-9064 Telephone (516) 765-1809 ~,?ct'APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS . BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 30, 1998 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hellenic Cabins & Snack Bar/Proposed Changes (1000-35-2-14) Dear Mrs. Moore: The Board is in receipt of your transmittal letter with Suffolk County Board of Review's Findings and Action (for proposed septic systems). It is requested that an Application for Site Plan Review be submitted at this time with the Planning Board in order that the agencies involved may fully review and coordinate under the State Environmental Quality Act (SEQRA). Please furnish us with seven (7) prints of the site plan maps once the parking and other site plan elements of the Zoning Code have been added. Thank you. Very truly yours, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN cc: Planning Board / Building Department I~~~ Southold Town Planning Board . LA\,I ']FFICES 1'~C10F:E . PAGE 01 09/18/1338 13:28 516 7t;54E.4~: ~i3F pe::, ~K.. PATRICIA C. MOORE Allomey at Law 51020 Main Road Southold. New York 11971 rei: (516) 765-4330 FIx: (516) 765-4643 Marsaftll RUlkoInki ScacIary September 18, 1998 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 eq Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hellenic Snack Bar and Cottages Southold Town Planning Board Dear Chairman and Board members: I am very pleased to advise you that the Health Department has approved the construction of 20 dwelling units in accordam'e with our application before your boards. We respectfully request that our applications befe.re your boards proceed. If there is anything also you need before proceeding with the applications please do not hesitate to contact me. s, GEORGE R]TCffiE LATHAM. JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ~-~ j~."~~ t't?~; ~ ~. Q . N "" '"" ~ ....., !'>J ,~ O~ . :![J ~O./ + i-~~I' ~~ . . PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS R]CHARD G. WARD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (5]6) 765-]938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 14, 1997 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. P.O. Box 483 315 Westphalia Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Hellenic Snack Bar and Restaurant 5145 Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 Dear Ms. Moore, The Planning Board had received your letter of February 5, 1997, regarding the above mentioned project. In your letter of February 5, you indicate that you are meeting with the Health Department and request the Planning Board to hold your application in abeyance until you can coordinate with all applicable agencies. Six months have passed since the check was written, since it most likely will not be honored by a bank at this late date, The Board is returning your check dated November 10, 1996, in the amount of $228.00. When you have resolved all applicable matters, a new check can be submitted along with a complete application package. If you have any questions, or require assistance, please contact this office. CQnc rf/;fy,,- ,d~ ~ /1 M<Y7'~ ~tKasnr Site Plan Reviewer ~ ~ ',l;, ~__4.._._r""""""--'--__--"'""'''''' ............_~.,__ _".~'" ..___ _~'__"4,._~__.._'~"___"__' ,.__. ~".., '~,'"'''' -J' ....,......'4_~ .._....4_~_....,..""_"._~..~~.. ~,..~. ... """.,'" .----_.~~.._-_._'-- "' .-",.. "', .'"'....~..'..^ .,-." . ..~..,"-'''~''''~ ,.....~.__..<....,.-~-,.... -.'" HELLENIC CABINS & SNACK BAR, INC. 5145 MAIN ROAD P.O. BOX 508 EAST MARION, NY t 1939 THE BANK OF NEW YORK GREENPORT, NY 11944 50.1063-214 4528 11/10/1996 PAY TO THE ORDER OF Town Of Southold $ ..228.00 . Two Hundred Twenty-Eight and 00/1 00.******..."'***..-......."'*..-....-."'..-..............**"'......._**..........-*_............... DOLLARS 11'001, 5 28"' 1:0 nl, ~ob 'I 71: 11'0 ~ 'I ~o n ,~~ MEMO ,,__..__'_.."r."___.~__.~"._~~-~-"._~..__._. "__~,,,,_,-,-,_'.'_~4____ ,-,_,___" - ,-_..........'_..._..,~_. .-. -,~...."~- -,.-. . . . SUtlf ~H< P8 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 315 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 483 Mattituck, New York 11952 Tel: (516) 298-5629 Fu: (516) 298-5664 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary February 5,1997 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold NY 11971 Re: site Plan Application of Giannaris and others (Hellenic Restaurant) Dear Mr. ~ki, Chairman; Thank you for the opportunity to conduct a site inspection with your Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals, and scheduling us for the work session so quickly. Please be advised that I have had a preliminary meeting with Roy Reynolds of the Suffolk County Health Department and an application to the Health Department will be submitted shortly. In light of the Health Department regulations with regard to this project we request that you hold this application and SEQRA determination in abeyance until such time as our Health Department Application is filed and we can coordinate the review with all applicable agencies. I thank you for your prompt action and cooperation in this matter. Patricia C. Moore cc: Mr. Salvati -----,.--~.'l 0\ ~ @ ~ ~ w ~Uii;'1.i ~~ r I l'li UUj FEB 61997 lL0j J SOUTHOlD TOWN PlMiN!NG BOARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBIs RICHARD G. WARD Chainnan GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR. WILLIAMJ.CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS -==-<0.. M-~~UFFOl.f ~~ Sl\;.~ ~~ ~ :::. ~ Q . ,.,. 'l: \\,.., ~ "~. ~ \. ~/> . ,~<:::,'r-" ~</./ .. i-"",' . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . ",," November 27, 1996"f' '; , Patricia C. Moore, Esq. P.O. Box 483 315 Westphhalia Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Hellenic Snack Bar and Restaurant 5145 Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 Dear Ms. Moore, The Planning Board has received your letter dated November 19, 1996, regarding the above referenced property. The Planning Board cannot process this application as the building set backs and the use is non-conforming in this zone. Town Code 100-242 A. states that a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming Use shall not be enlarged, reconstructed or structurally altered or moved unless the use of the building is changed to a conforming use. You have the right to obtain a notice of disapproval from the Building Department and appeal to the Zoning Board. I' You may withdraw the check and application or keep the application before this Board as you pursue action with the Building Department and Zoning Board. If you wish to keep your application before this Board the follOwing changes/additions must be made to the plan: 1. Scale 1" = 20' 2. Parking calculations, include two handicapped spaces one at the office and one at a rental unit. Show compacted or paved route from handicapped space to office and unit. , - 3. Drainage calculations 4. Outdoor lighting, include type fixture and wattage 5. Tax map number 6. Zoning 7. Metes and bounds 8. Landscape plan 9. Adjoining prl?perty owners 10. Key map~ ;.': . t-:" 11. Two foot'contours 12. Outdoor sign sketch to scale, include color The above list should not be deemed to be a complete list, please consult Town Code Article XXV Site Plan Approval for additional requirements. Please indicate the time frame for phase two for the office and possible swimming pool. Please provide samples of the material and color and other details of the construction for review by the Architectural Review Committee (see enclosed list for details). A review must be made by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and The New York State Department of Transportation. If you have any questions, or require additional assistance, please contact this office. A#L /( ~ U@i KassL~ Site Plan Reviewer cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector . , - Information to-b& submitted or included with submission to Architectural Re~~ew Committee. ,J-': * Site Plari:' * Type of Building Construction, Occupancy, Use and Fire Separation. * Floor Plans Drawn to Scale - 1/4"=1' preferred. * Elevation Drawings to Scale of all sides of each Building, 1/4"=1'prefsrred including the following information: Type and color of roofing - include sample. Type and color of siding - include sample. Type of windows and doors to be used, material and color of all windows and door frames include sample. Type and color of trim material include sampls. . Type of heating/cooling equipment to be used. Show exterior locations of all equipment i.e., heatpumps, air conditioning compressors, etc. on plans and/or elevations. * Type and locations of all roof-mounted mechanical equipment. * Type and locations of all mechanical equipment and/or plumbing venting through roof or building sidewall. * Type, color and style of proposed masonry material for chimneys or accent walls - include s.mples or photos. * Details, color, type and style of any proposed ornamentation, awnings, canopies or tents. * Photos of existing buildings and/or neighboring properties from four directions of project site. . Type, Color and Design of all exterior signage, both bUilding-mounted and free standing.