Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-35.-1-25 (3) ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 60 OF 2001 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON JANUARY 3, 2001: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby releases the performance bond No. NR17688 issued by the North River Insurance Company in 1987, in the mount of $100,000.00 for the condominium project known as "The Breakers at Lands End." This project was never built and has been replaced with a retirement community project in the name of "Peconic Landing" for which a bond in the amount of $3,964,216.00 has been deposited at the Suffolk County National Bank. This release is made all in accordance with the approval of the Town Attorney. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk JAN 08 2001 Southold Town Planning Board CRAIG SIRACUSA, P.E. ACTING REOIONA1 DIRECTOR November 10, 1997 Mr. Patrick Lenihan Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 Your May 16. 1997 Submisson Traffic Signal Plan Breakers at Lands End Route 25. Greenport Our Case No. 89-229 Dear Mr. Lenihan: This is in regard to your revised traffic signal plans submitted to this office for review. Prior to issuing a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items discussed with Mr. Matt Rankel on October 31, 1997 must be addressed: 1. Install a raised island for the pedestrian facilities on the southeast side. 2. Install pedestrian indications in the island and on the north side of Route 25. 3. Install handicapped ramps in proposed island. 4. Reduce width of travel lane from 15 feet to 12 feet and install an asphalt shoulder in order to provide for a bicycle path. This shoulder should continue west through the intersection and taper to meet existing conditions at the point where County Road 48 begins. 5. Install pavement as necessary to accommodate pedestrians using the pedestrian push-button on the north side of Route 25. 6. Install a W5-2D Pedestrian Warning Sign on the east side of Route 25 for northbound motorists. Mr. Patrick Lenihan page 2 November 10, 1997 According to our records you have not responded to our June 27, 1997 letter. Kindly address any outstanding items. In addition, we have not received the construction inspection agreement and the inspection payment agreement forms that were sent to your on April 8, 1997. Kindly submit four completed sets of revised plans to Mr. V. Lena, our Regional Permit Engineer at the above address. All correspondence must refer to our case number. Any questions pertaining to the review of this site plan may be directed to Mr. Dan Herlihy at (516) 952-6025. Very truly yours, Original Signed By THOMAS F. OELERtCH THOMAS F. OELERICH, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer cc: ~rMs. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold TFO:DH:BT Attachment EDWARD J. PETROU, P.E. RE<~IONAL DIRECTOR April 8, 1997 Mr. Patrick Lenihan Project Engineer Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 STATE OF NE~/ YORK DEPartmeNt OF TRANSPORtatION STATE OFFICE BUILDINg 250 VETERANS Memorial HIGHWAY HaUPPAUGE, N.Y. I i788-5518 JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN ACTINO COMMISSIONER Your December 4. 1996 Submission Breakers at Lands End Route 25. Greenport Our Case No. 89-229 Dear Mr. Lenihan: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to this office for review. Prior to issuing a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: A. Roadway Plans 1. These plans are acceptable as submitted. B. Traffic Signal Plan Kindly refer to the attached marked plan sheet for item number revisions and to add a note 14. Do not assume that the pole foundation matches the signal support pole rating. You must research Department records to conclusively establish the foundation size. There are no provisions for pedestrian activity other than the pedestrian push buttons located on each signal pole. Due to the proximity of this residential development to the downtown Greenport area a more detailed plan to accomodate pedestrian traffic should be developed. Mr. Patrick Lenihan Page 2 April 8, 1997 C. General Separate permits will be issued for the roadway and traffic signal work associated with this site. Permit fee and bonding information will be provided at a later date. Kindly sign and return the attached construction inspection agreement and the inspection payment agreement forms for this project. Kindly submit four completed sets of revised plans to Mr. V. Lena our Regional Permit Engineer at the above address. All correspondence must refer to our case number. Any questions pertaining to the review of this site plan may be directed to Mr. James Lentini at (516) 952-6020. Very truly yours, Original Signed By THOMAS F. OELERICH THOMAS F. OELERICH, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer cc: &s. Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold TFO:JL:BT Attachment EDWARD J. PETROU, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR October 17, 1996 STATE Of NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of TRaNSPORTatiON StaTE OFfiCE BUILDING 250 VeteRaNS MEMORIal HIGHWAY HAUPPaUOE, N.Y. 11788-5518 JOHN B. DALY COMMISSIONER Mr. Charlie Weidner Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Dear Mr. Weidner: Our Case No. 89-229 Br r ds End Route 25. Greenport Plan Submission SOUTHOLD TOW~-~ mANNI.N~ BOARD This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to this office for review. Prior to issuing a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: A. Roadway Plans The two proposed drainage basins on the north side of Route 25 must be relocated. Install one basin east of the westerly drive with a non-mountable curb box. The other basin is to be located at the west end of the project with a mountable curb box. 20 feet east of NYT 365 is a telephone manhole 6.5 feet offset, 2 feet higher than the existing shoulder. The walls of the structure may have to be modified to accommodate the widening. 3. Reset existing signs and mileage markers. Maple trees; 10 feet east of NYT 363, 6.5 feet offset, 24 feet west of NYT 362, 5.5 feet offset, will need removal due to proximity to proposed shoulder. The existing hydrant on the north side of Route 25 may require relocation as it may fall within 2 feet of shoulder. 6. Sawcut and seal existing transverse joints. The modify casting detail, section A-A, shows a 2.5 inch space between the grate and casting. As this is a bike route, a potential hazard to cyclists would exist. Mr. Charlie Weidner Page 2 October 17, 1996 8. Refer to the attached marked drawing TYP-1. Detail revisions are necessary as shown. 1. Refer to the attached marked drawings TS-1 and MSOS-1 for our comments. 2. The highlighted notes shown on the attached sheet must be included in your signal plans. There is an existing curb around the southeast comer radius of this intersection, therefore, install Type A curb in lieu of the flush curb proposed. 4. Conduit from PB#1 to SE signal pole is under sidewalk, which if excavated needs replacing. C. General Submit maintenance and protection of traffic plans for this project. Provide a plan note stating "No lanes may be closed before 9:00 a.m. or after 3:30 p.m. daily. ''No lane closings are permitted on weekends or holidays." A separate permit will be issued for the traffic signal work associated with this site. An approved traffic signal contractor must secure this permit and provide the required surety bond. Permit fee and bonding information will be provided when you receive plan approval at a later date. Kindly submit four sets of revised plans to Mr. V. Lena our Regional Permit Engineer at the above address. All correspondence must refer to our case number. Failure to include our case number will delay the processing of your permit. Any questions pertaining to the review of this site plan may be directed to Mr. James Lentini at (516) 952-6020. Very truly yours, Original Signed By THOMAS F. OELERICH THOMAS F. OELERICH Acting Regional Traffic Engineer cc: l~s. Valerie Scopaz TFO:JL:BT Attachment N.Y. ORGE C. STANKE ATTORNEY AT LAW 74 Montauk Highway Suite 22 Cheval Rouge East Hampton, N.Y. 11937 Tel. (516) 329-0396 Fax (516) 329-0398 bi~".*,,"~; N.Y. 11~4 March 14, 1995 Ms. Valerie SopaZ Planner Town of $0uthold Main Road Southold, New York 10971 Re: Brecknock Hall Dear Valerie: One of our local real estate brokers asked that I assist them in analyzing their listing of Brecknock Hall. Any assistance you could provide would be much aplpreciated. Generally, could you fax back to me the various zoning classifications of the property and what would be the yield/density permissible under those zones on this property i.e., r.uughly how many condominium units, how many square footage feet of commercial, how many house lots, etc. ThaD. k you for your cooperation in t.h'~tter. Sinc,~elT~u/rs' ~eor~-~. Stan~.evich BOARD Next week's foreclosure auction of Brecknock Halt involves family members. Brecknock Sale a Family Matter GREENPORT--More than just another dispute between a property owner and a mortgage lender, next Tuesday's scheduled foreclosure sale of the soundfront Brecknock Hall pro- perty has much to make it unique. There's the property itself: Said to have been given to the Floyd family by the British Crown prior to the Ameri- can Revolution, the deed includes 144 acres with 2,700 feet on the sound, and an 1880 stone mansion. It also holds full approvals with water and sewer contracts for 350 condominium units, with 12.4 acres on the North Road zon- ed for business use. And then there is the relationship be- tween the owners and the lender now embroiled in a legal dispute moving through the state courts: they are family. The principals in Greenport Develop- ment Company, which holds the title, are Bruce Wolowitz and his mother, Goldie. They acquired the property in 1984 for $3.85 million. LBV Properties of Patchogue, which won a mortgage default judgment of about $7.5 million, is controlled by Bruce's brother, Arnold. "Obviously, they're not on friendly terms;' said Charles Singer, Bruce and Goldie Wolowitz's attorney. Steven Schlesinger, LBV's attorney, declined to comment on the relation- ship. Postponed Sale A foreclosure sale was to take place on the steps of Southold Town Hall on March 26, but that was blocked when, at the last minute, the owners filed for Bankruptcy Court protection. The court dismissed the petition in early' April, clearing the way for next Tues- ~ day's sale, which also is to take place outside Town Hall at 11 a.m. The foreclosure order is the subject of a challenge pending in the State Sup- Continued on Page 9 Family Matter Continued from Page 1 reme Court's Appellate Division, said Singer. Both sides are awaiting a hear- ing date on the appeal, which was filed in April. "Under the circumstances, including the relationships between the parties, the mortgage should not have been foreclosed," said Singer, who added that his clients are attempting to secure al- ternative financing to prevent the auction. Should that effort fail, and no real- istic bids are received, LBV will take title, "which is not what they wantS'. said Schlesinger. "I'm hoping someone comes along, bids in a reasonable price and buys it:' The attorney said the company is ex- pected to follow standard foreclosure procedure and make the first bid. He declined to say what that amount will be. "It's a unique piece of property and I'm not sure what it's worth;' he said. "You can argue that it's worth almost anything, from nothing to millionsY Should LBV gain title through fore- closure, the company is free to reach a payment agreement with Greenport De- velopment under which that firm would retain ownership. Public Interest The property apparently attracted greater attention prior to the March auction date than it has since, said Ray- mond Edwards of Keen Realty Consul- tants of Great Neck, the owner's mar- keting agents. "There seemed to be more interest before the last auction," he said, "but that isn't to say people won't be there for this anctionY Prospective bidders are being asked to place 10 percent down and close within 30 days. A flyer sent out by Keen Realty des- cribes Brecknock Hail as "magnificent waterfront proi~ty" and an "exeell~llt ~ development opportunity" with sible financing available." Although the parcel has fullz~4v provals for the 350-unit condo~ini~~ project called Breakers at Land s E..n~, 2 including assumable contracts with ~t~[ Village of Greenport for water ~ sewer service, Keen Realty has b~ questioned on other uses, said Edwin "Our standard answer is a lot of value in this property is the appro it has," said Edwards. A new ov "could do what they want, but knows how long it will take to go to town to get approvals." Although the condominium remains soft, Edwards sees the as a good long-term investment. "If somebody has the wherewithal to hold the property ~ couple of years~' annual property taz added, "they can see how things out in a couple of years. There are pie out there who have that --Tim ! Save Brecknock Group Forms as Auction Looms By Ruth Jernick GREENPORT--The Brecknock Hall Society Inc. (BHS) was founded on Fri- day by a group of concerned citizens in- tent on preserving the historic mansion built on Route 25 during the 19th ceno tury by a descendant of Declaration of Independence signatory William Floyd. Toward that end, a representative of the fledgling nonprofit organization's hoard of directors will be in attendance as Brccknock Hail goes to auction on the steps of Town Hall at 11 o'clock Tuesday morning. (The auction was rescheduled last month after ownex Bruce Wolowitz's aaempt to stave off foreclo- sure in March by filing for bankruptcy And BHS members will meet again on Wednesday afternoon at the 350-yem- old home of Frank McIntosh adjacent to Brecknock Hall to plan their next step. East Marion resident Jane Gohorel to oversee hex neighbors' quest for fund- ing to explore the possibility of public acquisition of the old home -- while former Suffolk County legislator Gre- gory Blass signed on to serve as the group's legal counsel. The new hoard is composed of com- munity members who refused to "sit idly by and watch as the King's High- way landmark deteriorates," according to Mr. McIntosh."Once it's gone, it's gone forever," be~noted from the porch of the restored 1638 manor house (also built by the Floyd family) which he pur- chased in 1965. Society members toured Brecknock Hall after convening on Friday and con- ceived possible plans for converting its back acreage from a "wasteland" of un- filled ponds -- excavated when the cur- rent owner was pressing ahead with a sand mining operation and a town*ap- proved condominium construction pro- ject -- to a Cornell Cooperative Exten- sion research facility. "The time is ripe to move now," Mr. Blass counseled. "One thing in our favor is that the 'sand mine' could make the property less valuable." Some members broached a plan for On Pumping Out The New York Sea Grant Extension Program and the Connecticut Sea Grant Marine Advisory Program have devel- oped a directory of all the boat sewage pumpout facilities in area waters to help New York and Connecticut boaters plan more environmentally sound craises this summer. The directory, funded through a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, covers the south shore of Long Island as well as Long Island Sound, Block Island Sound and the Peconic- Gardiners Bay system. In addition to a map showing the lo- cation of more than 100 pumpout sta- tions, the directory includes information on costs, availability and water depths. The rules and regulations governing toi- lets and marine sanitation devices on The directory can be obtained free of charge by sending a stamped self-ad- dressed envelope to: Boat Pumpout Di- rectory, New York Sea Grant Extension Program, 125 Nassau Hall, SUNY/ Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794- 5002. approaching the town about possible ac- quisition of the land for a public golf course, as Supervisor Scott Harris sug- gested this spring. "Or we could find another entity -- perhaps the Eastern Suffolk School of Music -- so we could approach the owners and say we have someone interested in taking oceu- pancy," one society member speculated aioud. "We may ask to split off the hall and 12 acres, or somehow acquire the whole piece." In addition to Ms. Gohorel and Mr. McIntosh, board members include Bar- barn Moorhouse and Victor Brown of Greenport, Robert Bayley of Sou~old and Lucillo Field-Gondman of New Suf- ' folk. Their initial chaileage, as delineated by Mr. Blass on Friday, will be to raise $50,000 in "seed money" to hire an ar- chitect and consultants to advise the hoard on planning issues and grant ap- plication procedure. "That's number two," Mr. Bayley said with a smile. "Number one is to the hat and see if we can raise of hundred dollars to get tion going." All community joining the Breclmock Hall PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr, Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 June 8, 1992 Steven R. Schlesinger Jaspan, Ginsberg, Schlesinger, Silverman & Hoffman 300 Garden City Plaza Garden City Plaza, New York 11530-3324 Re: Brecknock Hall, Greenport SCTM # 1000-035-1-25 Dear Mr. Schlesinger: I have received your letter dated June 5, 1992, which was a response to mine of the same day. This is to confirm that the Planning Board did receive a copy of a survey showing the excavated area on February 20, 1990. Please disregard that portion of my letter and accept due apology for the oversight. The rest of the letter remains valid. We know that a Certificate of Occupancy was issued. However, an amended site plan still must be filed with this office. I trust this addresses your concerns. If there are further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office directly. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Bruce and Goldie Wolowitz Richard Lark, Esq. Keen Realty Consultants, Inc., Auctioneers Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq. LBV Properties Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Daniel Ross, Esq. UASPAN. GINSBERG. SCHLESINGER, SILVERMAN & HOFFMAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW 300 GARDEN CITY PLAZA GARDEN CITY, NEW YORK 11530-3324 516 746-8000 June 5, 1992 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. chairman, Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Brecknock Hall, Greenport SCTM #1000-035-1-25 Dear Mr. Orlowski: We represent LBV Properties, the mortgagee of the above noted property. We are in receipt of a faxed copy of a letter you sent to Bruce and Goldie Wolowitz dated June 5, 1992. In your letter, you indicate that water supply wells and a pump house were constructed without the approval of the Town of Southold. Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Certificate of Occupancy covering this construction. As is evident from the Certificate of Occupancy, the construction was fully approved and permitted by the Town of Southold. Moreover, a survey indicating that the excavated area is in full compliance with the site plan, is presently in the Town's possession, snd hes been for over one year. Therefore, your letter is entirely without basis in fact. As you know, a foreclosure sale of the above referenced property is to take place on June 9, 1992, at 11:00 a.m. We view your letter of June 5th as an attempt to, either directly or indirectly, interfere with, and chill the bidding at this judicially ordered foreclosure sale. Unless you issue a letter retracting your letter of June 5th in sufficient time to allow it to be read by prospective bidders prior to the auction, we will not hesitate to commence an action JASPAN, GINSB£RG. SCHLESINGER, SILV£R~AN & HOFF~4AN holding you and the Town liable for any damages caused to LBV Properties as a result of your baseless assertions. Please guide your actions accordingly. Very. truly y~)ur~, l/~ SRS:cs cc: Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq. Richard Lark, Esq. Keen Realty Consultants Matthew Kiernan, Esq. LBV Properties _ ~/ orlowski.lt 16610 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone 1516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD sco'i-r L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Certified Mail: June 5, 1992 Bruce and Goldie Wolowitz 18 Clinton Lane Jericho, New York 11753 Re: Brecknock Hall, Greenport SCTM # 1000-035-1-25 Dear Messrs. Wolowitz: This is to notify you that it is our understanding that you are acting in violation of the site plan approval for this property. A field inspection last month revealed that the water supply wells and pump house have been installed on the premises without an amended site plan showing same. (The approved site plan does not show a water supply and pumping station.) Furthermore, the Planning Board has not received a survey proving that the relocation of the excavated area is now in compliance with the boundaries of the proposed pond on the approved site plan. Although there is an approved site plan for this site, there are no active building permits. Therefore, if you or any of your contractors engage in any activity on this site, you may be doing so in violation of Section 100-239.1 of the Zoning Code, which prohibits excavations except in connection with construction for which a building permit has been duly issued. If this situation is not addressed within ten business days of your receipt of this letter, this matter will be turned over to the Town Attorney for further action. Sincerely, Bennett Or±owsKi, Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney Richard Lark, Wolowitzes's Attorney Steven Schlesinger, Attorney for Jasper Ginsberg, et. al. Keen Realty Consultants, Incl., Auctioneers Daniel Ross, Attorney for Village of Greenport GINSBERG, $CHL ER, $IL VERMAN & HOFFMAN Attorneys at Law 300 Garden City Plsz~ Garden City, New York ($16) 74~8000 (Telephone) (.ql 6) 74(r0S$2 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET FOR~I~L'I'L~LE TRANS.,4~.~SIONS PLEASE DELIVER IMMEDIATELY TO: COMPAq/ OFFICE NO: OFFICE NO: ~ ' YOU SHOULD RECEIVE PAGES 1NCLVDING THIS COVER PAGE. WE ARE TRANSMITTING ON A CANON F,L~ 705. IF YOU DO NOT RECE£VE THt~ TOTAL TRANF/M~SS'~ON PLEASE s~zr: ' ~: ' -~: ........ ~ M~ ~ ~g ~ ~PI~, YOU ~ UASPAN, GINSBERGo 5CHLESINGER, SILVER'lAN & HOFFHAN holding you and the Town liable for any damages caused to LBV Properties as a result of your baseless assertions. Please guide your actions accordingly. Ver~y truly ¥our~!', ~ /~ ~ SRS:cs cc: Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq. Richard Lark, Esq. Keen Realty Consultants Matthew Kiernan, Esq. LBV Properties _ ~/ orlowski.lt 16610 June 5, 1992 Orlowski, Jr. P!'~nning Board ttho] d fork 11971 Re: B~e~Y~l~OCk ~a/1, Oreenpor% $C%~[ #1000-03S-1-25 I'~; Mr, O~l, owski: .: ::~'ty. We ~e in receipt oi ~ fexed copy n ........... ~u~.e and Go!di~ wolowitz date~ June 5~ yo~ letter, you indict, re that water supply '~ and ~ouse were const~ct~d without the approval c~f ' old~, % :ansmitt~d herewith is a copy of ~e C;~:~%' ~F,t:e ," :~ver~nq thi~ con~t~ction. As is evident f~c~te ~,~ Occupancy, ~%~ ~:onstr~ct~on was ,'fully appr~ved itted by the To~l ef ~oreover, a s~ruey indicaLinq that ~he excavate<~ ar~a ~s ~n ,~nce w[~ the site plan, is presently in :~ion, 4Lad ha~ been for over one year. Therefore, your ........ ~n~J.~y :: %t~out ba~J~ Jn fact. you ~o~, a fo~eclo~'e ~ale of the above re ~nce~ [~roi~er~ty ~, to take pla_e on J~ne 9, 1992, ar ll:O0 We ~er~ of June 5th ~s ar ::pt to~ eider d~' ....... "v._ or ~,diz,~,.;tiy, '~, ....... ___ il! the bidding at :f~cial!y or.Jerec foreclo~;u~e ~..~s= you issue a ]~tt~'r :etr*~ctir:g yo%~ letter of J~ne 5th _~clent' ' t~m-~' to a..o~ -~ i'r ~'~,.t. be, tread by prospective b~dder~ S~ LVi:.RMAN & guide yo:~ actions accordingly. MAGNIFICENT WATERFRONT PROPERTY BRECKNOCK HALL Approved site plan of "' BREAKERS AT LAND'S END Main Road (25A), Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY 144 +_ Acres 2, 700 +_ ft. private beach on Long Island Sound 2,500 +- ft. on Main Road · Circa 1880 mansion · 2 natural ponds · Caretakers Cottage, barn and garage · Adjacent to Island's End Golf Course · Minutes from Orient Point Ferry EXCELLENT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY · Fully approved for 350 condominium units. · Municipal water and sewer to property · 12.4 acres zoned general business on Main Road · Site, development engineering and architectural plans approved · Inspection fee established/bonds posted POSSIBLE FINANCING AVAILABLE No representation is made as to the accuracy hereof, and is submitted subject to prior sale, changes or withdrawals, without notice. For more information contact: October 17, 1989 Mr. Thomas Filazzola Steven J. Hyman Associates 3505 Veterans Memorial Highway Suite M Ronkonkoma, NY 11779 Dear Mr. Filazzola: Our Case # 89-229 The Breakers @ Land's End Route 25~ Southold Your October 6~ 1989 Submission Our review of the subject plans will be coordinated by Mr. James Lentint of my staff, who can be contacted at (516) 360-6020 should any questions arise, Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, JAMES O. FREIN Civil Engineer III cc: Me. Valerie ScopazM JOF:JH:BT June 2, ~989 ~nd~n~t O'Callagban, P.E g neerlng ASao ' 66 Hain Stree~ Clates ~estha~pt°n Beach, New York Dear Mr. O'Callaghan: 11978 ~s at Land's End Our review of the subject material Will be COordinated by Hr. James Lentlnl of my Staff. He can be Contacted at /516) 360-6020 should any questions arise. Thank you for your COOperate[on COncerning ~h~[s matter. V~:UlyYours,' Regional ~r~f~e Engineer TCH: dtt: dS cc: b~. Valerle Scopaz~ December 13, 1988 Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 cl4m PLANNING 80~RO i Dear Mr. Dunn The Breakers at Land's End Route 25, Southold Your September 19, 1988 Submission Our review of the subject material was coordinated by Mr. James Lentini of my staff. Travel lanes and left turn lanes must be eleven feet wide, not ten feet wide as shown on the plans. Shoulders must be eight feet wide. The existing pavement is concrete and must be resurfaced with one and one half inches of binder asphalt (Item 403.11) and one inch of top asphalt (Item 403.1701). A tack coat (Item 407.0101) must also be included. The existing concrete pavement joints must be cleaned and sealed under Item 633.05 - Cleaning, Sealing and Filling Joints and Cracks, prior to resurfacing. The pavement itself must be cleaned under Item 633.0202 Cleaning Existing Pavement, prior to resurfacing. The overlay must be sawed and sealed under Item 18502.4401 - Saw and Seal Pavement and Shoulder Joints, after resurfacing. Cross slopes must be one quarter inch per foot on the travel lanes and one half inch per foot on the shoulders. The shoulders will be used as right turn lanes or parking lanes and should be six inches of subbase (Item 15304.1701), four inches of base asphalt (Item 403.13), one and one half inches of binder asphalt (Item 403.11) and one one half inches of top asphalt (Item 403.1701). This shoulder section is adequate for intersections and driveways. New concrete base pavement must be dowelled into the existing concrete pavement with load transfer devices at the Joints adjacent to the existing joi~ts in the concrete pavement. The concrete widenings must be of a uniform width from end to end, since narrow pieces of concrete will not hold up. The asphalt shoulders may be tapered. The widening on the south side should be extended full width to Manhasset Avenue. The overlay should also be extended. Thirty foot radii must be used for the entrance and exit driveways. There are three driveways on the south side. The plans must indicate what they serve and what affect the proposed left turn lane will have on them. The layout shows the entrance and exit each as 26 feet wide. However, Note 12 On Development Plan Sheet No. 1 indicates a 28 foot wide roadway. This must be clarified. Dunn Engineering Associates ~ecem~r 13, 1988 Page 2 In general, the entrance and exit drainage profile elopes steadily down toward Route 25 with a casting elevation of 14.17 at the exit. Route 25 is slightly below that. The high water elevation in Pond I is 13 feet, which is barely a foot below Route 25. The use of ponds as recharge basins in fairly new and there is limited experience on which to base their reliability. Drainage calculations must be furnished. Although the ponds can be designed to provide adequate storage, the leaching field along the edge of the pond is very limited and untested. The typical section shows a cut section on one side and fill section on the other. The cut section seems to apply to this north side as the land is higher than Route 25 as demonstrated by the profiles. No drainage structures are proposed along Route 25 and the shallow ditch created by the typical section will not serve much runoff. The profiles above the entrance and exit must be changed to create low points north of Route 25 so that overflow will be contained on site. There is a positive drainage system along the south side of Route 25 as shown on the plan. New structures must be placed on the north side and attached to this system. Specifically, basins must be placed on the east side of both the entrance and exit, connected with an 18 inch pipe to the existing system by crossing Route 25 opposite the basin at the exit and placing a manhole on the existing pipe. The existing catch basins on the south side of Route 25 are all block structurses on 24 inch CMP to a positive outlet. These must be removed and new precast catch basins with sumps installed in their place. We note that basins iA and 2A are shown as C, B - B48. B basins are round and we have no objection. An alternate is the A basin which is square. When given the option, contractors tend to supply the A basins because they are more readily available and possibly less expensive. Concrete curbing must be installed on the north side of Route 25 for a distance of at least 25 feet from each side of each driveway. The curbing must be extended west of the proposed exit to a point ten feet beyond the new drainage structure. In areas where no curbing is installed, tip up gutter must be provided on both sides of Route 25. The existing right-of-way width is 66 feet and the pavement is 36 feet wide, leaving 15 feet on either side if the pavement is centered in the right-of-way. With the proposed widening, the sidewalk area will be narrowed to approximately eight feet. Utility poles exist along the north side and are being set back into the eight foot area which places these fixed objects closer to the travel lanes and leaves no room for a future sidewalk. Sufficient room must be provided for a five foot pavement to the sidewalk, five foot sidewalk and three foot utility corridor, for a total sidewalk area of 13 feet. Hence, the available right-of-way is too narrow and a five foot property dedication should be considered across this site's frontage. One way signing must be provided at both driveways. At the exiting driveway, an R3-1C "Stop" sign must be provided as well as an R3-15C "Do/Not/Enter" sign. The stop sign at Manhasset Avenue may have to be relocated. ~n Engineering December ~3, ~988 Page 3 Since the subject site traffic will decrease the Level of Service at the Route 25 - CR48 intersection, the developer will be responsible for reconstructing this signal. Our traffic signal comments are shown on the attached marked up plan. In addition, the left turn arrow must be a lagging interval. Twelve inch lenses must be provided. The existing traffic signal poles are 30 feet high with a 6100 pound load rating. Pole loading calculations must be provided. Ail pull boxes must be numbered. A 24 inch stop line must be shown on the signal plans. Revised signal orders must be provided when the final signal plans are submitted. A note must be provided covering signal maintenance at this location. Face No. 3 will be too close to the stop line and not in proper ali~nment. It must be relocated. This also applies to Face 1. We will require four copies of revised Traffic Signal Plans incorporatinM the following: A. Table of Operations. B. Table of Clearances. C. Existing conditions and proposed work (other than signal). D. Ail proposed signal work with the appropriate state standard item numbers. Item numbers conforming to the latest edition of the New York State Specifications shall be used. E. Accurate property line information at critical locations, such as the vicinity of traffic signal pole placement, controller cabinet placement, underground conduit placement, etc. We may require dedication of property to the state by the permittee for traffic signal appurtenances. F. Ail underground utilities. G. Table of Quantities listing all traffic signal items to be included. H. Traffic Signal Pole Loadings. I. Copies of utility attachment agreements indicating payment fees must be provided if maintenance responsiblities for the traffic signal are to be assumed by the state. J. Pavement markings indicating existing and proposed lane use, as well as stop lines, crosswalks, and other markings. K. For resubmitted plans, revisions must be highlighted in red or another color to facilitate our review. Ail traffic signal work must conform to New York State Traffic Signal Detail Sheets 680-1 through 680-15, as well as the placement requirements specified in the latest edition of the New York State Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. A copy of all non-state standard specifications used in the signal work must be furnished. Prior to final activation of the traffic signal, wa must be provided with an "as built" 20 scale mylar reproducible showing all traffic signal work. Four copies of the necessary Notices of Order must also be submitted. Dunn Engineering Associates December 13, 1988 Page 4 We will also require ten copies of revised detail plans incorporating the following information: Location and dimensions of existing highway pavement, curb, sidewalk, median, median openings, guide rail, utilities, traffic signs, right-of-way lines and property lines. B. Existing and proposed buildings and appurtenances. C. Design features to be incorporated in proposed construction or reconstruction: 1. Width, pavement type and thickness of driveways. 2. Radii of driveway returns and other points of curvature. 3. Driveway grades or profile view of driveway. 4. Angle of driveways relative to the roadway center line. 5. Dimensions of roadside control islands and driveway medians. 6. Dimensions and elevations of curb and sidewalk relative to the edge of pavement. 7. Location of authorized traffic signs and proposed advertisement signs. 8. Existing and proposed pavement markings. D. Existing and proposed drainage features: 1. Size, type and grade of driveway culverts. 2. Highway drainage structures. 3. Direction of surplus water flow on applicant's property. E. Distance from each existing and proposed driveway on the site to: 1. The nearest side road in each direction if within 1000 feet. 2. The nearest driveway on adjacent properties. 3. Streets, roads, or driveways opposite the site. 4. Adjacent property lines. F. North directional arrow on each applicable sheet. Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plans and/or figures cited from Part 302 of the New York State Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. We will recommend any necessary lane closing restrictions. To allow for snow and ice control along the Jobsite by State forces, the contractor shall schedule his work in accordance with the following: No drums, cones, barricades and other traffic control equipment shall remain in a location where they will interfere with or be disturbed by a snow plowing operation. The work must be scheduled to afford the safe removal of such devices when necessary. Dunn Engineering Associates December 13, 1988 Page 5 Drainage frames, grates and covers shall not be adjusted in a travel lane unless the final pavement course is placed prior to the onset of snow and ice weather. Steel plates, etc. shall not protrude above the adjacent pavement. If any of these protrusions exist in a non-travel lane prior to a snow and ice condition, then temporary asphalt ramps must be placed so that for every one inch of rise, there is a six foot run of ramp. H® Details of internal traffic circulation, parking, traffic control devices and any proposed additional pavement lanes or widening. For major projects involving such pavement work, the plan sheets must be standard 22 inch by 36 inch size and placed in the order specified on page 21-3 of the New York State Highway Design Manual. Oversize sheets with cluttered or illegible information are not acceptable in any case. All submissions must be prepared by a licensed professional engineer, architect or land surveyor. I. For resubmissions, revisions must be highlighted in red or another characteristic'color to facilitate our review. These materials must be sent to our Regional Permit Engineer, Mr. Vito Lena, at the above address. If you have any questions, kindly contact Mr. Lentini at (516) 360-6020. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter, Regional Eraffic Engineer TCH:JH:JS cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz~ TO~n Hall. !4:27 N~.O08 P.02 Ho~sa No, S~eet ~ X~let Bulldin~ ~e~ prcvAmio~s of tho e~oro~d PL~tB~RS C~ITZCATION DAZZl__ ._ ~JASPaN. GINSBERG. SCHLESInGERo SILVERMAN & HOFFMAN ATTORNEYS At LAW 300 GARDEN C{TY PLAZA GARDEN CITY, NEVi/ YORI~ ii530-3324 516 746-8000 June 5, 1992 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Brecknock Hall, Greenport SCTM #1000-035-1-25 Dear Mr. Orlowski: We represent LBV Properties, the mortgagee of the above noted property. We are in receipt of a faxed copy of a letter you sent to Bruce and Goldie Wolowitz dated June 5, 1992. In your letter, you indicate that water supply wells and a pump house were constructed without the approval of the Town of Southold. Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Certificate of Occupancy covering this construction. As is evident from the Certificate of Occupancy, the construction was fully approved and permitted by the Town of Southold. Moreover, a survey indicating that the excavated area is in full compliance with the site plan, is presently in the Town's possessien, snd has been for over ene year. Therefore, your letter is entirely without basis in fact. As you know, a foreclosure sale of the above referenced property is to take place on June 9, 1992, at 11:00 a.m. We view your letter of June 5th as an attempt to, either directly or indirectly, interfere with, and chill the bidding at this judicially ordered foreclosure sale. Unless you issue a letter retracting your letter of June 5th in sufficient time to allow it to be read by prospective bidders prior to the auction, we will not hesitate to commence an action PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 June 9, 1992 Steven R. Schlesinger Jaspan, Ginsberg, Schlesinger Silverman & Hoffman 300 Garden City Plaza Garden City, New York 11530-3324 Re: Brecknock Hall, Greenport SCTM # 1000-035-1-25 Dear Mr. Schlesinger: I am writing in the hope of clearing up any misunderstanding that may have been engendered by two previous letters from my office that were dated June 5th and June 8th. The Planning Board does not wish to imply that there are any outstanding violations with the Brecknock Hall site plan. We are simply noting that at some point an amended site plan should be submitted which shows the location of the water supply station. I trust that this letter will put to rest any and all allegations that this Board is engaged in other than a notification of the present status of the approved site plan and project. Sincerely, Bennett Or±ows~i, or. Chairman cc: Bruce and Goldie Wolowitz Richard Lark, Esq. Keen Realty Consultants, Inc., Auctioneers Martin Bradley Ashare, Esq. LBV Properties Harvey Arnoff, Town Attorney Matthew Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Daniel Ross, Esq. THE ASSEMBLY STATE OF NEW YORk ALBANY June 28, 1990 ALBANY OFFICE ROOM 721 LEgiSLATiVE OFI~ICE BUILDING Mr. and Mrs. James Dinizio 39 Sound Road Greenport, New York 11944 Dear Jim and Joan: Enclosed please find a copy of the recent letter I received from the Regional Director of the New York State Department of Transportation regarding our request for a three color traffic signal at the intersection of Route 48 and Main Street. I believe that this is exactly what we wanted, and the context of Mr. Kuzloski's letter is most encouraging to me. If you believe that more follow-up is needed with the developers on the installation of this traffic signal, please let me know and I will be more than happy to pursue this for you. I hope that this will solve our problem finally, once and for all. Thank you again for all of your patience. iely' SAWICKI, JR. Member of the Assembly JS:tf Enclosure cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Supervisor Scott Harris JAMES A. KUZLOSKI REGIONAL DIRECTOR June 13, 1990 STATE Of NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. N.Y.' 11788 FRANKLIN E. WH[T£ COMMISSIONER Honorable Joseph Sawicki, Jr. Member of the Assembly 107 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Mr. Sawicki: Traffic Signal Route 25 at CR48~ Greenport Thank you for your letter; the information relative to Greenport's Development is appreciated. The developers of "The Breakers" have not secured a Highway Work Permit fro~ our office yet, but are in the final stages of doing so. The material they submit will be reviewed as expeditiously as possible; we anticipate completing this review a short time after receiving the material. On April 4, 1990, we indicated to the Town Planning Board that the developers will upgrade the existing flashing signal at this location to a regular three color signal. The developers have agreed to this. Your understanding and continued cooperation in traffic related ~atters is appreciated. Very truly yours, Regional Director PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD J~ne 18,1990 SCO'I'r L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Richard Lark P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, New York 11935 RE: The Breakers at Lands End SCTM#1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lark: The Planning Board inspected the excavation at this site. It finds that the excavation plan dated December 26, 1989 and received on February 20, 1990, reflects the excavation that has occurred to date. However, the Board wishes to emphasize that when Pond G is constructed it must conform to the dimensions and shape shown on the original approved site plans. Chairman RICHARD E LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 TELEPHONE 5~(~ 734-6807 May 11, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. 0. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman RE: The Breakers at Lands End - SCTM 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Orlowski: This is to acknowledge your letter of March 9, 1990. It was nice to see you finally signed a letter. However, the last para- graph in this letter is grammatically incorrect and is not true. If your correspondence documents contained a stamped signature, there is no indication that you or any other members of the Plan- ning Board have read it. Further, there is no authority for you to allow a stamp or facsimile signature. The Planning Board minutes do not indicate a resolution authorizing anyone to place your stamp signature on documents or correspondence. For your information, you should be aware even the President of the United States signs letters that he sends to individuals as well as exec- utive orders and other important documents. Therefore, it should not be too much of a burden for you as a public servant to take the time to read your correspondence and place your signature thereon. I am pleased to see at long last, the bills submitted by the engineering firm of Sidney B. Bowne & Son are being reviewed by members of the Planning Board. The previously submitted bills on the above captioned project contain numerous duplications of time which were totally unnecessary and indicates in the past, board members could not have reviewed these bills. I read in the local newspaper, the Planning Board had approved the revised plans that were submitted to you in my letter of Feb- ruary 15, 1990. However, I have not received any official resolu- tion to that effect. Please review your records and advise me accordingly. RFL:tt Very truly yours, STATE Of NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 JAMES A. KUZLOSK[ REGIONAL DIRECTOR FRANKLIN E. WHITE COMMISSIONER April 4, 1990 Ms. Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. SCopaz: Our Case # 89-229 The Breakers @ Land's End Route 25~ Town of Southold Your March 28~ 1990 Letter Our review of the subject plans is being coordinated by Mr. James Lentini of my staff. The developer's present proposal includes upgrading of the traffic signal at Route 25 and County Road 48 from a flashing device to three color operation. We are still awaiting the developer's $120,000 bond for this work but have been assured that we will receive it in the near future. If you have any questions, kindly contact Mr. Lentini at (516) 360-6020. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly y~ Region~ Traffic Engineer TCH: JL: BT AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACT/ON EMPLOYER JOSEPH SAWlCKI, JR THE ASSEMBLY STATE OF NEW YORK ALBANY April 3, 1990 Mr. James Kuzloski Regional Director Dept. of Transportation Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Enclosed June 27, 1988 Letter to Joseph Sawicki from Former Regional Director, Michael J. Cuddy - Our Request for a Three Color Traffic Signal at the Intersection of County Road 48 and Main Street in Greenport Dear Mr. Kuzloski: During 1987 and 1988 on behalf of residents of the Sound Road vicinity in Greenport I requested that your Department perform a study as to the feasibility of implementing a three color traffic signal at the potentially dangerous intersection of County Road 48 and Main Street in Greenport. Enclosed is the final response to our quest dated June 27, 1988 in the form of a letter from your predecessor. Specifically, in the last paragraph on the first page of that letter, Mr. Cuddy addressed the new condominium subdivision, as well as future retail stores, and the impact it would have on this intersection. He indicates that when and if the condominiums and retail center are built, that a traffic signal will be installed. He also indicates that the developer will be responsible for improvements to the existing traffic signal. From all indications, the new condominium complex is scheduled to begin construction soon; and to further complicate the situation, the new 29,000 square foot shopping mall has already begun construction. Enclosed please find for your information the advertisement indicating that "Greenport Commons" will be available soon. Apparently, the Southold Town Planning Board has indicated to residents of the Sound Road area that they had no knowledge of Mr. Cuddy's indication that the developer was to i~tall such a new three color traffic light at this very dangerous intersection. As you can see, time is now of the !~sence~ Since - 6 Mr. James Kuzloski Page Two April 3, 1990 these two new traffic generating plans will impose a great amount of traffic congestion and confusion at this intersection. Would you please have your Department investigate this matter again and contact the Southold Town Planning Board, if necessary, if the developer must install the three color traffic signal. In any event, I must reiterate to you how important a traffic signal is at this intersection, especially with the upcoming projects just months away. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter, and I eagerly await your response so I can pass it along to those concerned residents in the Sound Road area, as well as to the other town residents who must travel this intersection. incere~ly,· · ~ JOSEPH SAWICKI, JR. Member of the Assembly JS:tf Enclosures cc: Mr. and Mrs. James Dinizio, Jr. Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'I'r L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 March 28, 1990 Michael J. Cuddy Regional Director Department of Transportation Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 RE: Intersection at State Road 25 and County Route 48 and Main Street, Greenport Dear Mr. Cuddy: A copy of your June 27, 1988 letter to Assemblyman Joseph Sawicki, Jr. regarding the above-referenced intersection was brought to the Planning Board's attention on March 16, 1990. As you may be aware, the "Breakers at Lands End" project has received site approvals from the Town Planning Board and curb cut approvals from the State Department of Transportation. However, this office has not received any documentation as to whether the developer in question has been bonded for improvements to the traffic signal as noted in your letter. It would be appreciated if the status of the traffic signal's upgrade and supporting documentation could be made available for our records. Page 2 Michael J. Cuddy Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, Valerie Scopaz Town Planner for Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. cc: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk James Dinizio, Jr., Zoning Board of Appeals Joseph Sawicki, Jr., Assemblyman RANKING MEMBER COMMITTEES Ms. Joan Dinizio Sound Road Greenport, New York Dear Joan: THE ASSEMBLY STATe Of NEW YORK ALBANY July 12, 1988 11944 Enclosed is a copy of the response which I have finally received from the Regional Director for Long Island of the New York State Department of Transportation regarding the intersection at Porky's Restaurant. Then, as a follow-up, I am writing again to Mr. Michael Cuddy inquiring as to when their field engineers and inspectors performed their investigation. I am curious to know whether they, in fact, studied this intersection during the busy times of the year. I know that this is not all that we had expected, but it certainly is a step in the right direction. Please call me at concerns and ideas. JS:tf Enclosure anytime should you have erely, JOSEPH SAWlCKI, JR. Member of the Assembly additional ~V'IICHAE[. J, CUDDY REGIONAL DIRECTOR June 27, 1988 STATE Of NEW YOrK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONI VETERANS MEMORIAL HIghWAY HAUPPAUgE. N,Y. 11788 Honorable Joseph Sawicki, Jr. Member of the Assembly 1380 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Mr. Sawicki: Route 25 at CR48 and Main Street, Greenport Our September 8, 1987 Letter Your August 26, 1987 and September 30, 1987 Letters This reply will address the safety and operational concerns at the subject intersection which includes the subsequent three color traffic signal request to Mr. T. C. Hoffman. Our 1985 project at this intersection, improved the drainage, provided for pavement resurfacing, channelized turning movements and upgraded the signing. These improvements, along with the existing flashing traffic signal at the intersection, were intended to address safety and operational problems previously indentified at this intersection. The investigation requested showed that a three color traffic signal would not improve traffic operations at this time. Our investigation considered the frequency and conditions surrounding accidents occurring at the intersection, the number of pedestrians-and vehicles that pass through the intersection, and the delays they encounter while attempting to enter this intersection safely. We found very few accidents occurred at the intersection and no pattern of accidents that a signal would have prevented. Installation of traffic signals that do not meet minimum requirements can cause increased traffic congestion and a rise in the frequency of accidents. Field observations showed Sound Road traffic to be very light. Vehicles traveling north from Main Street to Sound Road did have room to proceed to the middle of the roadway before making a left turn to Sound Road and ~ did not see any operational difficulties associated with this movement. We will install a warning sign for northbound traffic on Main Street, Route 25 that would indicate the intersection of Sound Road. Because of your concerns, we asked for and received a revised Traffic Impact Study for "The Breakers at Lands End", a large condominium subdivision with a group of retail stores which will enter Route 25 approximately 1200 feet east of the Main Street intersection. This study showed additional traffic from the development would have ao impact on the Route 25 - Main Street/CR48 Honorable Joseph Sawicki, Jr. June 27, 1988 Page 2 intersection and the present flashing signal should then be converted to a three color, semiactuated signal with a left turn arrow for westbound to southbound left turning traffic. This matter will be pursued by us and the town as plans for "The Breakers at Lands End" are finalized. The developer will be responsible for improvements to the traffic signal. We also evaluated the speed on CR48, which enters the intersection from the west, with the Town and State Police. A 45 MPH speed limit has been established on CR48 from Moora Lane to Main Street. This is consistent with the 45 MPH speed limit on Route 25 east of the intersection, and addresses your concerns of traffic speeding through the intersection from west to east. We appreciate your concerns for the safety of the public and thank you for bringing these matters to our attention. Very truly yours, X' ~ I MICHA~]i J. CUD~Y Regional Director cc: Mrs. Judith Terry, Southold Town Clerk Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 9, 1990 Richard F. Lark, Esq. Main Road P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Dear Mr. Lark: I acknowledge receipt of yours of February 16, 1990. Your comments regarding the Town's engineering firm are noted and be assured that all submitted bills of the engineering firm are reviewed by the Board. As to the merits of your letter I have no comment except to point out to you that we did learn that the excavation for Pond G was extensive and did appear to be contrary to the approved site plan. You did prepare, at our direction, new surveys showing the location and extent of the pond excavation which will now be the subject of an amended site plan review. As to the last paragraph of your letter, which is apropos of nothing, I want you to rest assured that the Planning Board reviews all incoming and outgoing correspondence and this applies as well to materials which go out over my individual signature. ~~~/Ve ruly you , OwsK1, Jr./~ Chairman / cc: Goldie Wolowitz .,~ Bruce Wolowitz Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 9, 1990 Richard F. Lark, Esq. Main Road P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 ScoTr L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Dear Mr. Lark: I acknowledge receipt of yours of February 16, 1990. Your comments regarding the Town's engineering firm are noted and be assured that all submitted bills of the engineering firm are reviewed by the Board. As to the merits of your letter I have no comment except to point out to you that we did learn that the excavation for Pond G was extensive and did appear to be contrary to the approved site plan. You did prepare, at our direction, new surveys showing the location and extent of the pond excavation which will now be the subject of an amended site plan review. As to the last paragraph of your letter, which is apropos of nothing, I want you to rest assured that the Planning Board reviews all incoming and outgoing correspondence and this applies as well to materials which go out over my individual signature. ~..~_ ~ ~.~' ~,rul~ou~y ~/ Bennett Orlo~ski, Jr./~ Chairman -- cc: Goldie Wolowitz ., Bruce Wolowitz March 4, 1992 Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, New York 11978 Dear Mr. Dunn: Our Case No. 89-229 Breakers at Land's End Route 25, Greenport Your September 5, 1991 Submission This Department has reviewed your application to delete the traffic signal improvements at the Route 25 - Main Street/County Road 48 intersection as a condition of access to the first phase (condominium) development of the Breakers at Land's End project. We find the subject traffic signal must be improved in conjunction with the first phase access development. Attached for your reference is a copy of our May 23, 1990 letter to Richard F. Lark regarding bond and permit fees submitted by the Greenport Development Company to satisfy highway work requirements. The applicant must still apply for a separate traffic signal work permit. Insurance requirements have changed since our last correspondence. The attached PERM 17, Certificate of Insurance must be completed and returned to this office in accordance with Option A. You may instead choose to submit a $175.00 fee and be covered under the Department's Blanket Insurance Policy. Separate insurance submissions are required for each permit. SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Dunn Engineering Associates March 4, 1992 Page 2 Any questions regarding this project can be directed to Mr. J. Lentini of my staff. Permit fee, bond and insurance questions must be directed to Mr. V. Lena, the Regional Permit Engineer. Very truly yours, 0rigtnal Si~ned B~ ~ ~AM~ 0 o ~%EIN JAMES O. FREIN Regional Traffic Engineer Attaches cc: ~alerie Scopaz, Town of Southold JOF:JL:JS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 MEMORANDUM: TO: FROM: RE: Date: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner l~ The Breakers at Lands End Certificate of March 2, 1990 Insurance Enclosed please find a copy of a letter from Richard Lark and an original Certificate of Insurance for the Breakers at Lands End project. RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD ' R O. BOX 973 February 27, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman RE: The Breakers at Lands End SCTM ~1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Orlowski: On February 15, 1990 I forwarded you the revised plan in the above-captioned project. I was wondering if you had a chance to review same. I am enclosing a Certificate of Insurance issued by General Accident Insurance Company on 2/7/90 naming the Town of Southold as additional insured on this project with an effective date of March 1, 1990 and expiring on March 1, 1991. I have not received a reply to my letter of February 16, 1990 and I am wondering if you have had a chance to review same. RFL/bd Enclosure Very truly yours, cERTiFICATE NSURA E 'BSDEOATE M.,OD,YY 2/7/90 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THiS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, ~ ~T. ,,TACOSY ASSOCIATES, '[NC. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW 7 OLD ~ESTSURY ROAD EAST HILLS, NY 11577 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE CODE SUB-CODE INSURED GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CO. 100 GREAT NECK ROAD GREAT NECK, NY 11021 COMPANY LETTER A COMPANY LETrER B COMPANY LETTER C COMPANY LETTER O GENERAL ACCIDENT COMPANY LETTER E COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN iSSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOT~NITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WtTI~ RESPECT TO WHtCH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE iNSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LTR DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DOIYY) ALL LIMITS IN THOUSAND~ TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER GENERAL LIABILITY A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CGLO 104314-05 3 / 1 / 90 3 / 1 / 91 CLAIMS MASE X OCCUR. OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT. A GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000 PRODDCTS-COMPIOPS AGGREGATE $ 2 · 000 PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY $ 1,000 EACH OCCURRENCE $ I ~ 000 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ 50 MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any one person) $ 5 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE ANY AUTO LIMIT ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE EXCESS LIABILITY X XC005098403 3/1/90 3/1/91 OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKER'S COMPENSATION WC 011878405 3 / 1 / 90 3 / 1 / 91 STATUTORY $ 100 $ 500 EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY $ 100 A OTHER $ $ $ S EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE $3,000 $3,000 (EACH ACCIDEN~ (DISEASE--POLICY LIMI~ (DISEASE--EACH EMPLOYEE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS i i {! i ~ ............ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD INCLUDED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED AS RESPECTS PROPERTY .AT N/S MAIN ROAD, EAST OF SOUND ROAD, GREEPORT, SOUTHOLD, NY CERTIFICATE HOLDER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 ACORD 25-S (3188) ' ~ CANCELLATION ,; ;:-; ;.~ SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED 'POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL].O DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIASILITY OF ANY KIND UPON T COMPANY, IT G S OR RE RE~ENTATIVES. , ;~ ~ ACORD CORPORATION 1988 ISSUE DATE (MMIDO/YY) 2/5/9o PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS ~ J. JACOB~' ~,~.qOC~.~, TNC. NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOTAMEND, 7 OLD ~,~]~B~'RY ROAD : EXTEND OR ALTER.THE.. COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW EAST EIILLS, [~ 11577 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE CODE SUB-CODE INSURED G'RE~RT DEVF_,LOPt~NT CO. 100 Gt~.&T NECK ROAD G1L~T ~, ~ 11021 COMPANY LETTER A COMPANY B'~ LETTER : COMPANY LETTER C COMPANY COMPANY LETTER E ~ACCIDENT COVERAGES TYPE OF INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY A COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY Z CLAIMS MADE y OCCUR. OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT. ¢ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE iNSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING A~IY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE~SUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (M M/DO/YY) DATE (MMIDDIYY) ALL LIMITS IN THOUSAND~ POLICY NUMBER CGLO 104314-04 3/1/89 3/1/90 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON*OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIAEILITY EXCESS LIABILITY X XC005098402 3/1/89 3/1/90 WORKER'S COMPENSATION WC011878404 3-/1/89 3/1/90 OTHER GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000 PROOUCTS-COMPIOPEAGGREGATE $ 2,000 PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY $ 1,000 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ 50 MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any o~e person) $ 5 COMBINED SINGLE $ LIMIT BODILY INJURY $ (Per person) BODILY INJURY $ (Per acciden0 PROPERTY DAMAGE $ EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE $ $ 3,000 3,000 STATUTORY s 100, $ 500 $ 100 (EACH ACC[DENT) (DISEASE--POLICY LIMIT) (DISEASE--EACH EMPLOYEE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSIVEHICLESIREETRICTIONSISPECIAL ITEMS TOI~I OF SOUTHOLD INCLUDED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED AS RESPECTS PROPERTY AT N/S MAIN ROAD, EAST OF SOUND ROAD, GREENPORT, SO~, NY -cER~iJ=ICAT E HOLDER CANCELLATION TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD ,TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 ACORD 25-S (3~88) SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL l 0 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO T, HE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ,',~ ~ .~cLear~ { ~ ~ . , Jacob~ Associates Inc. 7 Old ~estbur~ Road East Hills, NY 11577 INSURED Greenport Development Corp & Greenport Development Co, 53 Glen Cove Road Greenvale, NY 11548 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMENB. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY A LE~ER General Accident COMPANY LE~FER '~ COMPANY eta LETTER C LETTER D COMPANY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY TIONsBE [SSUEOoF SucHOR MAYPoLiClEs.PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI- ~il .GENERAL LIABILITY OCCDR"ENCE AGGREG'.I ~IA ] :,. COMPREHENSIVE FORM GL 010 ~. 314 - O 3 i X PREMISES/OPERATIONS ~ ~ U~IDERGROUND EXPLOSION & COLLAPSE RAZARO PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OP£RATIONS ~' X ~ONIRACTUAL ] ~ PERSONAL INJURY ~A i~ UN~BR~LLA FORM XC0050984--03 !/ ,~0THERTRANUMBRELLAFORM )~ WORKERS' COMPENSATION 1,~P0118784 03 80DILY 3/1/88 3/1/89 ,~u.~¥ $500 $500 PROPERT~ D~.M.',~E $500 $500 81 & PD CO~B,.EO $ $ PERSONAL INJURY $ 5 0 0 3/1/88 3/1/89 B'& "~ COMBINED $5,000 $5¢000 3/1/88 3/1/89 $ 100 (EACH ACC;0ENn I i $ 500 ~DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT) ~ $ lo0 J31SEASE.EACH EMPLOYt r I ONS/LOCA ¥lO NS~VE HIC LE S/Sp ECiAL iTEMS TOWn of Southold included as additional insured as respects project at Route ~25, Greenport, Sout~[old, New York (unfenced ponds) Town of Sou~lo!d Town Hall Southol_~,: New York 11971 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE CESCRIBED POLICIES SE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX- PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIF CATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE L~FT. ~j0f FA LURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO ODLIGATION OR UABIUTY OF ANY KiND UPON THE COMPANY. ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD - ~ O. BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 TELEPHONE 516 734-6807 February 27, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman RE: The Breakers at Lands End SCTM 91000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Orlowski: On February 15, 1990 I forwarded you the revised plan in the above-captioned project. I was wondering if you had a chance to review same. I am enclosing a Certificate of Insurance issued by General Accident Insurance Company on 2/7/90 naming the Town of Southold as additional insured on this project with an effective date of March 1, 1990 and expiring on March 1, 1991. I have not received a reply to my letter of February 16, 1990 and I am wondering if you have had a chance to review same. RFL/bd Enclosure Very trj~y yours, ' AgOItl,.' cERTIFIcATE INSURANCE PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MA]'TER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, MARK f o ~'ACOBY ASSOC'rATE$, TNC o EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW 7 OLD WESTBURY ROAD EAST HILLS, NY 11577 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE CODE SUB*CODE INSURED GREENPORT DEVELOPM~ENT CO. 100 GREAT NECK ROAD GREAT NECK, NY 11021 COMPANY LETTER A COMPANY LETTER B COMPANY LET)-ER C COMPANY LETTER D GENERAL ACCIDENT COMPANY LETTER E COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN iSSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ASOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THiS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE ~NSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO ! LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER i GENERAL LIABILITY iA X COMMERCIAL GENERAL UABIMTY CGL0104314-05 ~ CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR. OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT. POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE IMM/DD/YY) 3/1/90 3/1/91 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIABILITY EXCESS LIABILITY A X XC005098403 3/1/90 3/1/91 OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKE.'S COMPeNSATeD, WCO 11878405 3 / 1 / 90 3 / 1 / 91 AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OTHER ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000 PRODUCTS-COMP/OPSAGGREGATE $ 2,000 PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY $ 1 ~ 000 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ 50 MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any one person) $ 5 COMBINED SINGLE $ LIMIT BODILY INJURY $ (Per person) BODILY INJURY $ (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE $3,000 $3,000 STATUTORY $ ]. O0 (EACH ACCIDENT) $ 500 (DISEASE--POLiCY LIMIT) $ 100 (DiSEASE--EACH EMPLOYEEI DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSIVEHICLESIRESTRICTIONSISPEClAL ITEMS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD INCLUDED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED AS RESPECTS PROPERTY AT N/S MAIN ROAD, EAST OF SOUND ROAD, GREEPORT, SOUTHOLD, NY -'~E R~'~ ~iC ~,T-~' H~:~ ~:D E R cANdELLATION I .....-~-~:~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE TOWN HALL EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 MAIL10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR , ACORD 25-S (3/88) LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON T COMPANY, IT G ,TS OR RE?.~RI~ENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE RATION 1988 PAY TO TH E ORDER OF RICHARD F. LARK A'R'ORNEY TRUST ACCOUNT P,O. BOX 973, MAIN RD. CUTCHOGUE, NY 11935 ,'ODD 5 5 ;,,' ?':0.~ i, hO 5 h ~, h': 553 -- _ ~'7 /='o DOLLARS RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD - R O+ BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 February 16, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman RE: The Breakers at Lands End SCTM #1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Orlowski: As I indicated to you in my letter of October 30, 1989 my client, Greenport Development Company, has no difficulty in reimbursing the Planning Board for engineering reviews and on-sight inspections performed, pursuant to the Agreement with the Planning Board of August 10, 1987, up to an amount of $25,000.00. With the recently enclosed reimbursement of $3,202.47 I believe my client has paid the Planning Board a total of $8,302.47. However, as previously indicated to you in reviewing recently submitted bills by Sidney B. Bowne & Son I believe you are getting "ripped off" by this firm. The bills by this engineering firm are not only duplicative they are ridiculous. Other than the work done by Robert Brown of that office you are paying for nonsense. You should carefully review these bills in the future and tighten your procedures. At least have someone on the Planning Board make sure you are getting services performed for what you are paying. I can say this because in checking out the allegations that the former excavator was exceeding the permitted limits of Pond G and running a sand mining operation, I was required to obtain aerial surveys as well as extensive ground surveys to cross check that he was in fact exceeding limits of the approved plan. This not only took several months but also several thousand dollars. Your engineering firm certainly did not do it. I am afraid you paid a lot of money for work you never received. Unless, of course, you have made special arrange- ments with Mr. Dean. My criticism of this engineering firm and your evaluation as to whether you should continue with them has not gone unnoticed. The former Town Attorney agreed with me when I pointed out that the engineering firm was making baseless allegations concerning this project which Southold Town Planning Board -2- February 16, 1990 they could not back up. In any event Pond G is now in substantial compliance with the the site plan. We are going to be continuing to do additional work around this Pond to conform it to the site plan and get the surface ready for planting of grass to prevent further erosion. This work is being done by Terry Latham of Latham Sand & Gravel. When the Planning Board is doing its on-sight inspections and you find him working there feel free to ask him any questions you might have concerning the work. In addition you will find work is also taking place to develop the well field to provide water for the Village of Greenport. One last comment I would personally like to have a response to is to find out whether or not you ever see any of the correspondence sent out either over your unsigned or stamped signature. I think it is an insult for anyone to receive such correspondence. If you are too busy to read your letters then you should reconsider your position with the Planning Board. If it were not for the diligent outstanding staff, I do not think anything would ever get accomplished. RFL/bd Very truly yours, {~ichard F. Lark RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD - F~ O. BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 1~935 TELEPHONe 5~6 734-6807 FAX 516 734-5169 February 15, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman RE: The Breakers at Lands End SCTM #1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Pursuant to recent unsigned following: prior conversations with your staff and your letter of January 30, 1990 I am enclosing the Four sets of a detailed revised plan, including road profiles, for The Breakers at Lands End completed by Steven J. Hyman Associates with various revisions as requested by the Southold Town Planning Board. "As Built Excavation Plan for Pond G" revised Dec. 26, 1989, prepared by Haubenreich & McDaniel Licensed Land Surveyors. 3. Copy of letter dated February 12, 1990 fro~ . Steven J. Hyman, P.E. to Richard Lar~,..-,~'~;' ? Esq. explaining the highlights of It~'i~"?, Nos. 1 and 2 above, v~''~' 4. Copy of letter from Vito F. Lena, RegiOhal Permit Engineer of the New York State ~ Department of Transportation, to Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. dated January 24, 1990, indicating approval of the curb for this project at State Route 25. My Escrow Check No. 553 payable to the order of Southold Town Planning Board dated February 15, 1990 in the amount of $3,202.47, representing the amount due the Planning Board for on-sight inspections and reviews of the site plan by the Southold Town Planning Board engineers. Southold Town Planning Board -2- February 15, 1990 Certificate of Insurance issued 2/6/90 by General Accident Insurance Company naming the Town of Southold as additional insured concerning this project (When this insurance policy expires on 3/1/90 a replacement insurance policy will be delivered to the Planning Board). The revised plans should be self-explanatory since they are done in conformance to the Planning Board's request at the meeting held at the Town Attorney Office on January 12, 1990 in which you were in attendance. I believe they comply with your request of leaving Pond C in a "natural state" and the New York State Department of Transportation's require- ments for the "curb cut" at State Route 25. I would appreciate you reviewing these plans to make sure they comply with the Planning Board's requests. However, if you have any questions, both Steven Hyman and myself will be available to meet with the Planning Board at your convenience. Awaiting your reply, I am RFL/bd Enclosures Very ~t3~uly yours, ~l~hard Februar3- 12, VIA MESSENGER SERVICE 1990 consulting engineers Mr. Richard Lark, Esq. Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: The Breakers at Lands End Project: 8743 Dear Dick: Enclosed herewith are five (5) sets of revised plans for the above captioned project. We have il~corporated the revisions requested at our meeting with the Town Attorney on January 12, 1989. The major changes made to the plans are as follows: i. Pond "C" bas been eliminated. The plans have been revised to indicate that the natural depression at that location will remain intact. Th· e. only stormwater that will be tributary to the natural depression will be that portion of the site that naturally drafns in that direction. No roadway ruuoff will be allowed to drain into the natural depression. The roadway drainage has been diverted from that area to Ponds "D" and "G". To make up for the storage capacity lost by the elimination of Pond "C", Ponds "D" & "G" have been enlarged accordingly. 2. Pond "I" has been revised in accordance with NYSDOT's request. Similarly, the road profile for Rodeo Drive bas been modified slightly at the request of DOT. 3. We have added sedimentation basi]~s to the drainage lines to intercept sediment prior to it entering tile ponds. Although the Town bas not required this and it will cost the developers additional funds, it will benefit the project as well as reduce future maintenance of these storage ponds. In a related matter, we have received the most recent "as-built" survey for Pond "G" from Haubenreich and McDaniel (two copies enclosed for your reference). We have the followi~g comments: A. This "as-built" survey reflects work throu"~D~cember. 26, 1989. 3505 Veterans Memorial Hwy., Suite M / Ronkonkoma, N.Y. 11779 / (516) 737-3378 / Fax: (516) 737-0753 Mr. £ichard Lark -2- February 12, 1990 Tile difference between this survey and the previous "as-built" survey (dated July 25, 1989) is that the southwest corner of the excavation has been regraded to conform more closely to the final configuration indicated on the approved site plall. I am assuming that as the work proceeds, the finished product will substalltially couform with our plans. The bottom of the excavation is approximately at elevation 5.0+_, which is 8' below the normal water level (elevation 13.0). My conversations with Bruce Wolowitz indicate the following: The bottom of tile pond will be at elevation 9.0+_, which would provide 4'-0" of water under normal conditions. The poud liner would be placed 2'-0" below the pond bottom {elevation 7.0), which would provide a two foot protective cover over the liner material. An additional 2'-0" of screened sand will be placed below the pond liner in order to protect the liner from punctures and ruptures due to sharp objects such as rocks, tree branches, etc. Utilizing Bruce's coucept, the bottom of tile excavation should be at elevation 5.0+, which is in line with what was measured in the field. Early next week I will be writing you a separate memo to discuss other aspects of the project not relating to this submission. Please feel free to contact me at our office in the event that you have any questions or require any additional information regarding this submission. Sil~cerely, Steven J. Hyman, P.E. encl . cc: Mr. Mr. Arnold Wolowitz (letter only) Bruce Wolowitz (letter + 1 set of plans) ¥ f m,, CERTIFICATE CODE SUB-CODE INSURED GREENPORT DEV-ELOPMEN'~ CO. 100 GREAT NECK ROAD GREAT NECK, ~/ 11021 INSURANCE "SUEOATE,MM,DD, Y, 2/6/90 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY LETTER A COMPANY a~ LETTER COMPANY LETTER C COMPANY LETTER D COMPANY LETTER E ~ENEP, AL ACCTDEI~ COVERAGES THIS )S TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING A'~IIY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE~SUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MMIDDIYY) DATE (MM/DD/YY) ALL U~ITS IN THOUSANDS CGL0104314-04 3/1/89 3/1/90 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIABILITY EXCESS LIABILITY XC005098402 3/1/89 3/1/90 OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKER'S COM.ENSAT~ON WC011878404 3/1/89 3/1/90 AND EMPLOYERS' MASIMTY OTHER GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000 PRODUCTS-COMPIOPSAGGREGATE $ 2,000 PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY $ 1,000 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000 FIRE DAMAGE (Any ~e lire) $ -~0 MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any one person) $ 5 COMBINED SINGLE $ LIMIT SODILY INJURY $ (Pe¢ person) BODILY INJURY $ (Per acciden{) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE $ $ 3,000 3,000 STATUTORY $ 100 $ 500 $ 100 (EACH ACCrDEN~ (DISEASE--POLICY (DISEASE--EACH EMPLOYEE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSIVEHICLES/RESTRtCTIONS/SPEClAL ITEMS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD INCLUDED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED AS RESPECTS PROPERTY AT N/S MAIN ROAD, EAST OF SOUND ROAD, GREENPORT, SOUTfiBLD, NY CERTI~=ICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO TOWN ~,~'[, MAIL ] 0 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO '~HE SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, iTS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. ACORD 25-S (3/88) Bufln Engineer~ng Aaaoe~atea~ P,C. 66 Ha!n Street ' ~e~the~p~on Besch, ~e~ ¥o~k 11778 A:ten:ion Dear Mr. I~ovr-~~o~t This ts tn reference to the alta plans aub~itted to th!s o~ftce £or revleu, Upon revie~ of the proposed ~or~, ue find that the plsn~ are aCee~Eable as submitted. Upon aub~iCtal o£ the required peta~l: fee and Sure~ bond (sample enclosed)~ a H~lh~ay 9ot~ ~t~it rill then be issued. Permit Fee (Payable to "State o£ Bond A~ount; $20,000. Aa stated in rout I)ece~ber ~ 1989 letter, A_qy question, pertatn!n~ ~o this case ~ay (~16) 360-602:.. ~0 F. LE~A cc: ~'b. Valerie Seopa~ VI~L:JL:js bee dtrecced to ~es Left,tnt at RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD - f~ O. BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 TELEPHONE 5~6 734-6807 February 2, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Valsrie Scopaz Re: The Breakers at Lands End - SCTM i000'35'I'25 Dear Valarie: I have your letter of January 30, 1990. As I indicated to you on the telephone, I should be able to comply with all your requests within two weeks. Steven Hyman, who is the engineer on the project, has indicated that the final survey maps are currently being coordinated with the site plan. I have been authorized by the owners of the property to receive all correspondence and communica- tions concerning this development project. If you have any further questions or need additional information, do not hesitate~-~ontact me. Very truly yours, ~ichard F. L~fk RFL:ks CC: Arnold Wolowitz January 24, 1990 Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, New York Attention Mr. Ron fItll Dear Mr. Hill: 11778 Our Case No. 89-229 Breakers at Land End Route 25~ Greenport This is in reference to the site plans for the above noted project which were submitted to this office for review. Upon review of the proposed work, we find that the plans are acceptable as submitted. Upon submittal of the required permit fee and surety bond (sample enclosed), a Highway Work Permit will then be issued. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): $502.50 Bond Amount: $20,000. Aa stated in your December 4, 1989 letter. Any questions pertaining to this case may be directed to James Lentini at (516) 360-6020. Very truly yours, VITO F. LENA Regional Permit Engineer cc: fL. Valerie Scopaz VFL:JL:JS $OUTHOL9 PLANNING,BOAP, D Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 Richard D. Lark P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 PLANN~G BOARD OFFICE TOW~ OF SOUTHOLD January 30, 1990 RE: The Breakers at Lands End SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lark: With regard to the above referenced project, the Planning Board would appreciate a response to its prior letter on the following matters: Letters of October 23, 1989 and November 24, 1989 requesting reimbursement of $3,202.47 for engineering review and inspection costs, as per an August 1987 written agreement between your client and the Planning Board. Letter of February 22, 1989 requesting compliance with the agreement made on January 12, 1989 in the Town Attorney's office regarding revised grading plans to reflect actual excavation activity. Letter of December 6, 1989 requesting a copy of revised curb cut plans that were approved by the New York State Department of Transportation. A review of the file showed that the Certificate of Insurance for unfenced ponds needs to be extended from 3/1/89 to 3/1/90, at least. For your convenience, a copy of all the aforementioned correspondence and the supporting documentation has been enclosed herein. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. The Board looks forward to a prompt and cooperative response. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman Encl. VS:hp cc: Bruce Wolowitz & Goldie Wolowitz Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 22, 1989 Bruce Wolowitz Greenport Development Company 100 Great Neck Road Great Neck, New York 11201 RE: Breakers at Lands End SCTM# 1000-35-1-10 Dear Mr. Wolowitz: Enclosed please find a report from the office of Sidney B. Bowne & Son dated February 17, 1989. The Planning Board requests compliance with the report. At the meeting held on January 12, 1989 in the Town Attorney's office, you informed me that there would be no problem contacting you, and that you would submit additional information if need be. The Planning Board has asked numerous times for additional information, and, to this date, only insufficient information has been received. The Planning Board agrees with the enclosed report, and if the information is not submitted, steps will be taken to halt the operation. truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN ~dney B. Bowne, P.E., ES. (1922-1959) Chester C Kelsey. P.E., L.S. Alexandre W. Mercil. P.E. Robert A. Stanton, P.E. Robert W. Brown. L.$. Z&bdiel A. Blackman. P.E., L.S. George A Style, PE. Jer~ D. Almont, P.E. George L. Fagan, Jr., Ph.D., PE. Frank Capobianco, CE. Thomas R. Pynchon. L.S. 45 Manor Road ~: , ,Philip Schlolzhauer February 17, 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Breakers at Lands End, Town of Southold, New York S.C.T.M.: 1000-35-1-10 (SBB NO. 87132) Dear Mr. Orlowski: We are in receipt of your correspondence of February 10, 1989 including the copy of Mr. Lark's letter and survey pertaining to the above referenced project. The survey map did not contain any further information than did the previous map submitted. Subsequent to the previous map submission, we had explained that the data shown was insufficient and detailed what we thought was reasonably expected. An inspection of the site made on this day indicates that the excavation operation has resumed. For this reason we believe it would be proper to insist upon the necessary survey information from the developer. If the information is not forthcoming immediately, we would then recommend steps be taken to halt the operation until the developer complies. Please let us know if you require further details regarding this matter. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS ABC:clg cc: R. Jacobs (Supt./Hwys) R. Dean F. Murphy, Supv. A. BARTON CASS, P.E MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($1~) 76~-~ 9~ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Richard F. Lark Attorney at Law Main Road P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, New York 11935 January 24, 1989 RE: The Breakers at Lands End SCTM#1000-35-1-10 Dear Mr. Lark: Pursuant to the January 12th meeting held in the Town Attorney's office, enclosed please find a report from the office of Sidney B. Bowne & Son dated January 17, 1989. Please comply with the above mentioned report. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ~.3 '- CHAIRMAN ~ Sidney B. Bowne, P.E., L.S. (1922-1959) Chester C Kelsey, P.E., L.S, Alexandre W. Mercil, PE. Robert A. Stanton. P.E. Robert W Brown, L.S. Zabdiel A. Blackman, P.E., kS. George A. Style, P.E. Jerry D Almont, PE George t Fagan, Jr, PhD, PE. Frank Capobianco, CE. Thomas R. Pynchon. SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 (,%1~)~ 4-0611 SOU i HOLD TO ~ N , January 17, 1989 Roland Anders Roger L Cocchi Francis J Lynch Philip Schlotzhauer Joseph F Ste~man Paul F Stevens William T Styne Richard R Weber Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Breakers at Lands End, Town of Southold, New York SBB No. 87132. Dear Mr. Orlowski: We have received some additional information from the developers engineer on the above referenced project. Part of the material submitted was intended to provide enough data so that the limits of the excavation for Pond G could be fixed while construction takes place. The plan we received did indicate some random elevations indicating the depth of excavation but we feel additional information should be supplied. In order that we may more precisely monitor the progress we would require the following. 1. A grid of existing surface elevations 50 ft. on centers covering the area of Pond G. Survey information indicating how the 50 ft. grid was established in the field so we may reproduce it on the project plans (Baseline or reference line data). 3. Periodic reports showing the changes in elevation at the established grid points. This would allow us to report the approximate amount of material excavated as well as determining that the Pond is correctly located. We feel that this is a reasonable request which the owners engineer/surveyor can supply with modest effort. MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER Mr."Bennett Orlowski, Jr., TOW~ OF SOUTHOLD January 17, 1989 Page Two If you need further information or have any questions concerning this matter please give us a call. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS ABC:rp c.c: Ray Dean SB8 No. 87132 A. BARTON CASS I 128 , .='4 !485,1 !410,,91 915 . 6 3 '! · 7 4 1002~42 82n2,:,7 Total billed: '.~20(~ '"" Total paid: 5000. Total due: ~202,,47 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 · Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHO~LD December 6, 1989 Richard F. Lark Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: The Breakers at Lands End SCTM #1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lark: This will confirm the call on December 6, 1989 to your office, requesting revised curbcut plans for the above referenced project. (See enclosed letter dated November 28, 1989). The Planning Board would appreciate receiving the revised plans as soon as possible. If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact this office. eno. / Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ~ .~.~ January 24, 1990 Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. 66 Fain Street Westhampton Beach, New York 11778 Attention Mr. Ron Hill Dear Mr. Hill: Our Case No. 89-229 Breakers at Land End Route 25p Greenport This is in reference to the site plans for the above noted project which were submitted to this office for review, Upon review of the proposed work, we find that the plans are acceptable as submitted. Upon submittal of the required permit fee and surety bond (sample enclosed), a Highway Work Permit will then be issued. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): $502.50 Bond Amount: $20,000. As stated in your December 4, 1989 letter. Any questions pertaining to this case may be d~rected to James Lentini at (516) 360-6020. Very truly yours, VITO F. LENA Regional Permit Engineer cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz ~ VFL:JL:JS SOUTHOLD TOg~ PLANNING BOA~O Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 19, 1989 Robert W. Brown Sidney B. Bowne & Son 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 Dear M~. Brown, Re: Breakers at Lands End Bill of December 8, 1989 Farm Veu Estates Bill of November 20, 1989 Franklinville Homes Bill of November 20, 1989 Review of the latter two applications and field inspection of the Breakers was not authorized by this office. Therefore the enclosed bills cannot be processed. Sara of your office indicated that some applicants may be sending maps directly to your office for review. If this is the case, then those applicants are violating the Planning Board's policy that all maps go to your office through the Planning Board office. If you feel this is the problem, please let me know. Perhaps we need to remind applicants of the procedure. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Very Truly Yours, Town Planner for Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman n~t N No emb r 20 19 ~c;ou umber ............. Invoice # ........... Date v e TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK N Y., Dr. PAY TO: Payee Identihcat~on Payee Na °r S°cial Secu rity Nun~.~ Address: ................... ..~-" "' ..... Phone No. ( .... ) ....................... Vendor Contact Cash Discount .................. % ......... Days .................................... 'Item Description of Material/Service Quantity Unit Amount No. Price Frandlinville Homes preliminary review 177.15 Total 177.15 ,/~ Disco~,~ above na~ed cl~mant} doe~ h~rebv certify that The rt thereof has/b~en,pa~exc~as~,therein stated, the for _~.~ .k~ I owinq. / 'X / A/ Dated..N. qv.e.m.b.e.r..2.0.,..1.9.8.9. ............ 19 .... KC Signatur PLEASE REMIT TO: SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER November SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 (516) 724-0611 20, 1989 Town of Southold 37395 FRANDLINVILLE HOMES, MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY REVIEW. For the period of: 08/29/89 to 09/25/89 PLEASE REMIT TO: SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER $ 177.15 9128189 08:34:58 PAGE SIDNEY ~o BOW!tE ~ SON MANAGEMenT IN~ORNATZO~ SYSTEN JOB DET~IL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD FROH AUG. 29, 19~9 TO SEPT 2S, 1989 ......................................... HRL¥ RATE .................................. TOTAL SALARY S~LARY ****** FOR THE WEEK ENOING SEPT 11, 1959: 000510 CASS ~. ~ARTON ~ 35.4306 O.O 0.0 70.86 SUB TOTAL $ 70.85 TOTAL $ 70.86 MULTIPLIER 2.50 SUB - TOTAL FEE S 177.15 TOTAL FEE $ 177.15 SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 (516) 724-0611 December 8, 1989 87132 Town of Southold BREAKERS AT LANDS END Engineering review and inspection For the period of: 10/24/89 to 11/20/89 PLEASE REMIT TO: SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 180.56 MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · SZDNEY B. EOWNE & SON ~ANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEH 11128/89 18:10:44 PaGE 74 JOB DETAZL REPORT FOR THE PERIOD FRON OCT. 24, 1989 TO HOVo 20, 1989 JOB NUMBER: OBZl~g JOB NAME: , EREAKeI~ B LANT:$ E~NSP TBR/EO NO.: TYPE OF SERVICE: CLIENT NUMBER: SOHO CLIENT NAME: SOUTHOLC JOB CLASS: R PROJ. MGR. · BROWN ~'' EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION DAILY HOURS WORKED TOTAL -- ' HRLY RATE .................................. TOTAL SALARY SALARY LAST NAME FIRST NAME (REG, OT) TUB WED THU PR[ S~T MON HOURS COST C~T ObUdi~ FOR THE WEEK ENDING NOV. 6, 19891 TOTAL $ 72.22 MULTIPLZER 2.50 SOB-- TOTAL FEE $ T8~.56 TOTAL FEE $ 180.56 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($16) 765-1938 PLANN~G BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 6, 1989 Robert W. Brown Sidney B. Bowne & Son 45 Manor Road Smithtown, NY 11787 RE: Breakers at Land's End Southold, New York SCTM #1000-35-1-14125' SBB # 87132 Dear Mr. Brown: The Planning Board is in receipt of a November 6, 1989 report from your office regarding a field inspection of the above-referenced site. This work was not authorized by the Planning Board. While the Wolowitz Organization has agreed to pay engineering review expenses incurred by the Planning Board; they will pay them, only if the work has been authorized in writing by the Board. If your staff should receive a verbal request for an inspection, they should notify Planning staff of the request. No work should be under-taken until written authorization is either transmitted to your office or handed to a member of your staff. Otherwise the Planning Board cannot be responsible for payment of services rendered. If there should be any questions, please do not hestitate to contact me. Very truly yours Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Account Number ............. Invoice #..1.6.8.q8. ...... Date...N.o.v.e.m.b.e.r..2.0...19.8.9. ........ PAY TO: Payee Name: Bowne Address: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, N.Y., Dr. Payee Identif ' or Social Security Nu~t~ Payee Reference:'~ULI't'~ 87225 Phone No. ( .... ) ....................... Vendor Contact Cash Discount .................. % ......... Days .................................... Item Description of Material/Service Quantity Unit Amount No, Price Farm Yew estates Subdivision Review $126.81 Total 126.81 The un ove nam t) do reby certify that ?h~ fnreooino claim ~s true ano correct ano [nat no Dart · hereof ha/s been ~3id. ex~/c,~-~ therein ~tated and that the balance therein stated is actually due and owing. Dated. N.o.v.e.m.b.e.r.. 2.0,: .................. 19 .8.9.. Signature PLEASE REMIT TO: SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER November SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 (516) 724-0611 20, 1989 Town of Southold 87225 Farm Veu Estates - Subdivision Review For the period of: 09/26/89 to 10/23/89 PLEASE REMIT TO: SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 $126.81 MINEOLA ,, SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER 10/26/89 09:17:S3 PAGE 88 SZONEY 8. 80~NE & SON MANAGEMENT ZNFORMATZO~ SYSTEM JOB OETAZL REPORT FOR THE PERZO0 PROM SEPT 26, 19~9 TO OCT. 23, 1989 ......................................... HRLY RATE .................................. TOTAL SALARy SALARY 000~20 FOR THE WEEK ENDING oCT. 16/ 1989: KOHN JOHN H. R 25.~626 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 SUB TOTAL S0.73 S 50.73 TOTAL S 50.73 MULTIPLIER g. SO SUB - TOTAL FEE S 126.81 TOTAL FEE $ 126.81 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (SI6) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 24, 1989 Richard F. Lark Main Road -Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: The Breakers at Lands End, Greenport SCTM # 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Lark, Enclosed please find copies of the Engineer's timesheets. These were supposed to have been included with the letter of October 23, 1989. If there are further questions, please do not hesitate to call this office. O~lowski, Jr. /"' Chairman enc. VS/vs Sidney B. Bowne, P.E., L.S. (1922-1959) Chester C. Kelsey, P.E., L.S. Robert A, Stanton, P.E. , Robert W. Brown, L,S. Zabdiel A. Blackman, P.E., L.S. Frank J. Antetomaso, P.E, George A. Style, P.E. Jerry D. Almont, P.E. George L. Fagan, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. Frank Capobianco, C.E. Paul F. Stevens, P.E. Roger L. Cocchi, P.E. Thomas R. Pynchon, L,S. SIDNEY B. BOWNE 45 Manor Road Smithtown, N.Y, 11787 (516) 724-0611 November 6, 1989 Roland Anders Francis J. Lynch Philgp Schlotzhauer Joseph F. Stegman William T, Styne Richard B, Weber Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Breakers at Lands End, Town of Southold, New York S.C.T.M.: 1000-35-1-10 (SBB NO. 87132) Dear Mr. Orlowski: It had been indicated that material was being removed from this site. On 11/2/89, Ray Dean and C.S. Heffernan, both of this office, visited the site in an attempt to ascertain whether or not this was true. We found a bulldozer and earth scraper parked and the site inactive except for a survey party. However, tire marks of various equipment (i.e. payloader, trucks) along the western perimeter of the pond area indicate that work had been underway, the extent of which we were not able to determine. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS CSH:clg cc: R. Jacobs (Supt./Hwys) R. Dean A. BARTON CASS, P.E MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER November 28, 1989 Dunn Engineering 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, New York 11978 Attention: Mr. Ron Hiii Dear Mr. Hill: Our Case No. 89-229 The Breakers at Lands End Route 25~ Greenpo~t Your October 10~ 1989 Letter This is in reference to the site plans for the above noted project which were submitted to this office for review. Prior to the issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: Drawing No. GP-I (sheet 1 of 5) Roadwork Plan (bottom of sheet): No detail is provided for full depth pavement replacement for drainage crossing between Structures 11 and 12. Drawing No. S-1 (sheet 2 of 5) Section A-A a) change Item 15503.0104 (9" "Class F" concrete) to Item 10503.0104. b) under note, change saw and seal overlay Item 18502.4401 to 18403.2502. ® Drawing No. S-2 (sheet 3 of 5) Section C-C a) area of concrete widening (left side of typ. sect.), change Item 403.11 (1 1/2") to Item 403.13 (1 1/2"). b) area of asphalt widening (right side of typ. sect.) change Item 403.11 (3") to 403.13 (3") and change Item 403.13 (4 1/2") to 403.11 (4 1/2"). Resubmission of revised plans must be identified as revisions and must refer to our case number. Failure to provide this information will delay the processing of your permit. Dunn Engineering November 28, 1989 Page 2 Upon submittal of the revised plans, permit fee and surety bond enclosed), a Highway Work Permit will be issued. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"): 502.50. Bond Amount: 120,000 Any questions pertaining to this case may be directed to Jim Lentini. at (516) 360-6020. Sincerely, (sample VITO F. LENA Regional Permit Engineer cc: Ms. Vaierie Scopaz~ VFL:JS File: Ref. 25, Greenport MEMORANDUM TO: James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney/ Raymond Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways Valerie Scopaz, Town PlannerA November 13, 1989 Breakers at Lands End FROM: DATE: RE: With regard to the enclosed report from Sidney Bowne's office, the Planning Board did not authorize the conduction of a field inspection. Was a request made by another department? If so, what action is the Planning Board expected to take with regard to this report? cc: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Sidney B. Bowne, P.E., L.S. (1922-1959) Chester C. Kelsey, P.E., kS. Robert A. Stanton, P.E, . Robert W. Brown, L.S. Frank J. Antetomaso, P.E. George A. Style, P.E. Jerry D. AImont, P.E. George L. Fagan, Jr., Ph. D,, P.E. Frank Capobianco, C.E. Paul F. Stevens, P.E. Roger L, Cocchi, P.E. Thomas R. Pynchon. L.S. SIDNEY B. BOWNE 45 Manor Road Srn thtown N.Y, 11787 (516) 724-0611 - 8 J9 9 November 6, 1989 Roland Anders Francis J. Lynch Phillip Schlotzhauer Joseph F. St·groan Richard B. Weber Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Breakers at Lands End, Town of Southold, New York S.C.T.M.: 1000-35-1-10 (SBB NO. 87132) Dear Mr. Orlowski: It had been indicated that material was being removed from this site. On 11/2/89, Ray Dean and C.S. Heffernan, both of this office, visited the site in an attempt to ascertain whether or not this was true. We found a bulldozer and earth scraper parked and the site inactive except for a survey party. However, tire marks of various equipment (i.e. payloader, trucks) along the western perimeter of the pond area indicate that work had been underway, the extent of which we were not able to determine. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS CSH:clg cc: R. Jacobs (Supt./Hwys) R. Dean A. BARTON CASS, P.E MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 8, 1989 Richard F. Lark Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: The Breakers at Lands End, Greenport Dear Mr. Lark: Enclosed please find copies of the Engineer's reports. These were supposed to have been included with the letter of October 23, 1989. The information sent with the October 23rd letter itemizes the time spent on each report. V~mv truly yours, /G/ _.,,, /,, ,~.. // Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman 37~ ~ Sidney B. Bowne, P.E.. L.S. (1922-1959) Chester C. Kelsey. P.E., L.S. Robert A. Stanton. P.E.. Robert W. Brown. L.S. Zabdiel A. B~ackman, P.E.. L.S. Frank J. Antetomaso. P.E. George A. Style, P.E. Jerry C. AImont, P.E. George L. Fagan. Jr.. Ph.D.. P.E. Frank Capobianco. Paul F. Stevens, PE. Roger L. Cocchi. P+E. Thomas R+ Pynchon, L.S. SIJNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road ::-r,-.: ......... Smithtown, N.Y, 11787 :': i ;': :i (516) 724-0611 ~: .... November 6, 1989 Roland Anders Francis J. Lynch Phillip Schlotzhauer Joseph F. Stegman William T. Styne Richard B. Weber Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Breakers at Lands End, Town of Southold, New York S.C.T.M.: 1000-35-1-10 (SBB NO. 87132) Dear Mr. Orlowski: It had been indicated that material was being removed from this site. On 11/2/89, Ray Dean and C.S. Heffernan, both of this office, visited the site in an attempt to ascertain whether or not this was true. We found a bulldozer and earth scraper parked and the site inactive except for a survey party. However, tire marks of various equipment (i.e. payloader, trucks) along the western perimeter of the pond area indicate that work had been underway, the extent of which we were not able to determine. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS CSH:clg cc: R. Jacobs (Supt./Hwys) R. Dean A. BARTON CASS, P.E MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER MEMORANDUM FROM: DATE: RE: James A. $chondebare, Town Attorney Raymond Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways Valerie Scopaz, Town PlannerA November 13, 1989 Breakers at Lands End With regard to the enclosed report from Sidney Bowne's office, the Planning Board did not authorize the conduction of a field inspection. Was a request made by another department? If so, what action is the Planning Board expected to take with regard to this report? cc: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. RICHARD F. lARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAiN ROAD - R O. BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 NOV - 3 1989 OctoBor 31, 1989 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall - 54095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Re: The Breakers at Lands End Dear Mr. Orlowski: I am in receipt of your letter of October 23, 1989 with what appears to be your stamped signature thereon. Greenport Development Company acknowledges its obliga- tions pursuant to its agreeement with the Planning Board dated August 10, 1987. However, I found in reviewing the photocopies of the bills which run from a period of September 1, 1987, to March 23, 1989, that these bills do not indicate what was done by the Town's engineering firm, Sidney Bowne & Son. In particular, the bills do not indicate how much time was spent or what they actually did in the course of "Engineer- ing Review and Inspection". I also note that you paid the sum of $5,000 pursuant to these bills. What I do not understand is how or why you paid on these types of invoices, since they do not comply with the applicable provisions of the Town Law, as there is no itemized voucher certified by the engineering firm. I have forwarded the bills and letter on to Greenport Development Company for payment, but even if you do not insist on knowing what actual work was done, what type of inspections were performed, what kind of engineering reviews were done, as well as the amount of time spent, Greenport Development Com- pany insists on it. I apologize for being technical, but paying bills of this nature dictates that you know what you are paying for~ Assuming the Town does not care, the property owner, as a tax- payer, does., so your prompt attention to this matter would be appreciated. Very~ruly yoursff RFL:ks CC: James A. Schondebare Town Attorney Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 23, 1989 Richard Lark P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: The Breakers at Lands End SCTM #1000-35-1-~0-~s'- Dear Mr. Lark: This letter is being sent pursuant to a condition of the Planning Board's site plan approval of July 6, 1989. Your client and I signed an agreement to that effect on August 10, 1987. Pursuant to that agreement, the Planning Board was to be reimbursed for engineering reviews and on-site inspections for an amount up to $25,000.00. An initial payment of $5,000.00 was paid in August of 1986 to cover projected expenses. A review of our books reveals that the engineering expenses to date are $8,202.47. It would be appreciated if the difference ($3,202.47) were to be submitted to this office. Enclosed, please find all pertinent correspondence related to this request, including the engineering reports and the bills that were submitted to the Planning Board. Your prompt cooperation is appreciated. If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to contact this office. BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN ene: cc: James A. VS/jt Schondebare, Town Attorney July 24, 1989 Mr. James O'Callaghan Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street ~esthampton Beach, New York 1 1978 Dear Mr. O'Callaghan: Our Case No. 89-229 The Breakers at Land's End Route 25p Southold Your Ma~ 22~ 1989 Submission Our review of the subject plans was coordinated by Mr. James Lentini of ~y staff. In sections A-A and B-B, Item 403,1i must be Item 403.13. In Section B-B, all references to Item 403.13 should be to Item 403.11. One inch must be the thickness of Item 403.1701. This also applies to Section C-C. The 7" asphalt pavement structure shown in Sections B-B and C-C should be extended 100 feet' east of the entrance at Station 17+80 and 100 feet west of the exit at Station 12+45 on the north side. Section C-C shows a 1/4 inch per foot downward slope to the north from the property line after dedication while the profiles prepared by S.J. Hymen show a minus 1.00 percent slope. The low points immediately north of Route 25 on the entrance and exit roadways are only 3" and 1 1/2" lower than the high point at the property line. The low points must be lower, as would be the case if the 1/4" per foot slope is used. The overlay must be sawed and sealed. A drainage analysis must be conducted to insure that Pond I does not overflow and flood Route 25 during a 50 year storm. This analysis can only assure a minimum water service elevation of +10.0 at the start of the rainfall event if the following conditions are met: 1. The subsurface conditions at structure #DWI-10 are conducive to excellent infiltration characteristics. Me Using the rainfall pattern we have experienced this spring, the standing water surface elevation in Pond I, at this point in time, does not exceed +10.0. blt. James Lentini July 24, 1989 Page 2 Item 13 in your letter discusses consideration of a five foot dedication. We hereby request that this dedication be furnished. This area of Route 25 is included in an ongoing durable pavement marking contract, which will install epoxy center line and lane line markings. If the developer's work will be completed this summer or fall, we will exclude the striping work from our contract. We have enclosed copies of traffic signal orders which must be completed to reflect the final traffic signal plans. The plans must note that the signal contractor will be responsible for maintaining the signal until the time of final acceptance. In the near future, we will inform you whether w~ are able to supply a microprocessor signal controller at this location. Please send 10 copies of the revised plans to our Regional Permit Engineer, Mr. Vito Lena, at the above address. If you have any questions, kindly contact Mr. Lentini at (516) 360-6020. Thank you for your continued cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Regional T~gine e r TCH:JH:JS cc: bis. Valerie Scopaz~ September 22, 1988 Dunn Engineering, ~sociates 66 !~ln Street Westb~pton Beach, NY 11978 Oear ~lr. Dunn: The Breakers @ Land's End R~oute 25, Southold Your September 19~ 1988 Submission Our review of the subject material will be coordinated by Mr. James Lentinl of my staff. !le can be contacted at (516) 360-6020 should any questions arise. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this -matter. Very truly yours, / T. C. Regional ~af~ic Engineer cc: t~s. Valerie Scopazd TCH:jH:~T Sidney {3. Bowne, P.E., LS, (1922-1959) Chester C Kelsey, P.E., L.S. A~exandre W. Mercil, P.E. Robert A. Stanton, P.E. Rober{ W Brown, L.S. GeorgeA Style, PE. JerP/ D Almont, P.E. George L. Fagan, Jr, Ph.D., P.E. ThomasR Pynchon, L.S. SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 (516) 724-0611 September 12, 1988 Roland Anders Frank Capobianco Roger L COCChi Francis J Lynch Philip $chlotzhauer Joseph F Stegman Paul F Stevens William T Styne Richard B Weber Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Excavation Inspection - Condos, "The Breakers at Lands End", of Southold, New York (SBB NO. 87132) S.C.T.M.: 1000-35-1-10 Gentlemen: As requested, we have prepared the following estimate inspection services during excavation at the Breakers Condos. Estimated max. hours: 600 hours @ $43/hour : $25,800.00 We are prepared to begin work when authorized to proceed. ROBEq{T W.-BROWN. RWB:clg cc: Ray Dean (SBB) C. S. Heffernan Town for MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/H Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box l 179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman Breakers at Lands End August 10, 1988 According to the attached correspondence from Sidney B. Bowne's office, work has been started and continues on a portion of the drainage system for this site. However, there is no approval by the Planning Board and Sidney B. Bowne for the drainage system. Please review the Planning Board's conditional resolution of approval. If other arrangements and the applicants, please records are in order. have been worked out between the Town notify the Planning Board so that our /' / /7 /'7 BENNETT ORLOSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN enc. cc: Town Board Building Department jd Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE ($~6) 76S-~93a PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD e MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Planning Board Office Insurance Policy for unfenced Ponds at the Breakers at Lands End. August 5, 1988 Please file the enclosed certificate of insurance with the Town's records. jt Sidney B. Bowne, P.E., L.S. (1922-1959) Chester C Kelsey, P.E., L.S. A~exandre W. Mercil, P.E. Robert A. Stanton, P.E. Robert W. Brown, LS Zabdiel A Blackman, P.E., L.S. George A. Style, P E Jerry D, Almont, P.E. George L Fagan, Jr, Ph.D., P.E. Thomas R Pynchon, kS. SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road ~"'~ Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 (516) 724-0611 August 1, 1988 .d Anders r Capobianco r k Cocchi :is J Lynch ~ Schlotzhauer )h F Stegman F. Stevens m T Styne ~ard B Weber Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re'- Site Inspection, "The Breakers at Lands End", Town of Southold, New York (SBB NO. 87108) S.C.T.M.: 1000-35-1-10 Gentlemen: A site inspection of this subject subdivision was conducted on 7/29/88. We find that excavation has been started on Pond "A". This excavation at Pond "A" is a highly sophisticated operation with two portable screening plants separating sand and gravel, and correlates very closely to a mining operation. The excavated, screened material has been trucked off the site, as of this date. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONS~I~ING_ ENGINEERS ROBERT A. STANTON, P.E. CSH:clg Encl. cc: Ray Dean (SBB) Ray Jacobs, Supt. of Hwys. MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW July 27, 1988 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. RE: Breakers at Lands End Dear Mr. Orlowski: Pursuant to conversations with the Town Attorney I am enclosing the Certificate of Insurance regarding Greenport Development Corp. from 3/1/88 to 3/1/89. Kindly note same and file the Certificate with the Town Clerk. RFL/bd Enclosure Very truly you.r~, ~ichard F. Lark c.c. James A. Schondebare, Esq. eta jacOl'-.~v Associates Inc. 7 old k~estbury Road East Kills, NY 11577 INSURED Greenport Development Corp & Greenport Development Co, 53 Glen Cove Road Greenvale, NY 11548 GENERAL LIABILITY ~ ALL OWNE A OTHER THAN ~ 0 UTOS (ERIV PASS.,) ~:(~--] dMBREL~ FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKERS' CO~,IPENSATION ISSUE DATE (MM/DD/YY '88 dh THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE ODES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY j~ LEI"FER General Accident COMPANY LETTER ~ COMPANY .LETTER C COMPANY D LETTER COMPANY LETTER ~ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE SEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONOITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIDED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDO' TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES, GL0104314-03 3/1/88 3/1/89 XC0050984-0! 3/1/88 3/1/89 WC0118784-03 3/1/88 . 3/1/89 LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS EACH AGGREGAT $500 $500 ;500 $ PERSONAL INJURY $ 5 0 0 $ ~' ~' ~'~ 000 $5,00( COMSlNED $ 5 r 'J ii 100 iEAOH ACCIOENT) , 5 0 0 ~01SEASE-POLICY 10 0 ,¢ISEASE-EACB E,MELm'! Town of Southold included as additional insured as respects k3roject at Route ~t25, Greenport, Southold, New York ~Un~enced ponds) Town of Soul, old Town Hall Southol~F New York 11971 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES ~E CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX- PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE C~.RTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY DF ANY HIND UPON THE COMPANY. ITS AGENTS DR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE July 26, 1988 Dunn Engineering Associates 66 blain Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Dear Mr. Dunn: The Breakers at Land's End Route 25, Southold Your July 22, 1988 Submission Our review of the subject material will be coordinated by Mr. James Lentini of my staff. He can be contacted at (516) 360-6020 should any questions arise. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, T. C. HOFF~ZA~ Regional Traffic Engineer TCII: Jtt: JS cc: ,Ms. Valerie Scopaz % Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM To: Whom it may concern: The enclosed letter pertains to the proposed development of the Brecknosk Hall property. Note that the reconstruction of Route 25 may be required by the State. (see page two of the letter). Sincerely, Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Highway Dept., Ray Jacob Police Dept., chief Dan Winters Highway Com., Jean Cochran, Chairperson Supervisor Murphy Building Dept., Victor Lessard enc. RECEIVED BY June 8, 1988 Dunn Engineering Associates 66 Main Street Westbampton Beach, NY 11978 Dear Mr. Dunn: The Breakers at Land's End Route 25, Southold Your April 7, 1988 Snbmission Our review of the subject Traffic Impact Study was coordinated by Mr. James lmntin5 of my staff. The revised study addresses the concerns enumerated in our October 14, 1987 letter. However, we are still awaiting ten copies of the detailed site plans incorporating the following information: Location and dimensions of existing highway pavement, curb, sidewalk, median, median openings, guide rail, utllities, traffic signs, right-of-way lines and property lines. B. Existing and proposed buildings and appurtenances. C. Design features to be incorporated in proposed constrnctlon or reconstruction: 1. Width, pavement type snd thickness of driveways. 2. Radii of driveway returns and other points of curvature. 3. Driveway grades or profile view of driveway. 4. AnKle of driveways relative to the roadway center line. 5. Dimensions of roadside control islands and driveway medians. 6. Dimensions and elevations of curb and sidewalk relative to the edge of pavement. 7. Location of antborized traffic stMns and proposed advertisement signs. 8. Existing and proposed pavement markings. D. Existing and proposed drainage features: 1. Size, type and grade of driveway culverts. 2. ~ighway drainage structures. 3. Direction of surplus water flow on applicant's property. E. Distance from each existing and proposed driveway on the site to: 1. The nearest side road ~n each direction if within 1000 feet. 2. The nearest driveway on adjacent properties. 3. Streets, roads, or driveways opposite the site. 4. Adjacent property lines. Dunn Engineering Associates June 8, 1988 Page 2 F. North directional arrow on each applicable sheet. Ge Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plans and/or figures cited from Part 302 of the New York State ~nual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. We will recommend any necessary lane closing restrictions. To allow for snow and ice control along the Jobsite by State forces, the contractor shall schedule his work in accordance with the following: No drums, cones, barricades and other traffic control equipment shall remain in a location where they will interfere with or be disturbed by a snow plowing operation. The work must be scheduled to afford the safe removal of such devices when necessary. ® Drainage frames, grates and covers shall not be adjusted in a travel lane unless the final pavement contra, is placed prior to the onset of snow and ice weather. Steel plates, etc. shall not protrude above the adjacent pavement. If any of these protrusions exist in a non-travel lane prior to a snow and ice condition, then temporary asphalt ramps must be placed so that for every one inch of rise, there is a six foot run of ramp. Ms Details of internal traffic circulation, parking, traffic control devices end any proposed additional pavement lanes or widening. For major projects involving such pavement work, the plan sheets must be standard 22 inch by 36 inch size and placed in the order specified on page 21-3 of the New York State Highway Design Manual. Oversize sheets with cluttered or illegible information are not acceptable in any case. All submissions must be prepared by a licensed professional engineer, architect or land surveyor. The provision of a left turn lane at the site's entrance will reconstroction of the entire width of Route 25. The impact of travel lanes closer to the south curb line must he addressed. necessitate shiftinM the Table A summarizes capacity analyses improvements and indicates that Level of Service increases from E to B. We question this. The capacity analysis only utilized one lane for the eastbound approach. Mowever, the roadway discussion on page 10 of the report implies that two lanes are available. We are holding our final decision regarding three color traffic signal operation at the Route 25 - CR48 intersection until the capacity analyses issue is resolved. If you have questions, kindly contact Mr. Lentini at (516) 360-6020. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. cc: ~ts. Valerie Scopaz~ April 12, 1988 Dunn Engineering Associates 66 ~in Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Dear Hr. Dunn: The Breakers @ Lands End Route 25~ Southold Your April 7, 1988 Submission The review of the subject Traffic Impact Study will be coordinated by Mr. James Lentini of my staff. Be can be contacted at (516) 360-6020 should any questions arise. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, JAI~S O. FREIN Civil Engineer III cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz,/ JOF:JH:BT October 30, 19¥7 Dunn Engineering, P.C. 00 ~lain Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Dear ~lr. Dunn: The Breakers at Land's End Route 25, Sonthold You will recall our October 14, 1987 letter wherein we noted that the subject Traffic Impact Study discussed only three of the four sections shown oa the maps. The Town of Southotd has informed us that the subject developer intends to develop the southwest corner of the site as a large retail shopping mall. Your revised Traffic Impact Study must take this into account. Thank yoo for yonr cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Regional~,.'~fic Engineer cc: Iis.'Valerie Scopaz ~'~ TCD:Jti:BT Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 26, 1987 Raymond Jacobs Highway SUperintendent Peconic Lane ~econic, NY 11958 Re: Breakers at Land's End at Greenport, SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Jacobs: Enclosed for your information, is a copy of correspondence received from the State regarding the traffic study for the above mentioned proposal. We have requested copies of the revised surveys which Dunn Engineering will be submitting to the State and upon receipt will forward one to you. Please let us know if you have any comments on this matter. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD enc. Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 26, 1987 H. Daniel Winters Chief of Police Main Road Peconic, NY 11958 Re: Breakers at Land's End at Greenport, SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Winters: Enclosed for your information, is a copy of correspondence received from the State regarding the traffic study for the above mentioned proposal. We have requested copies of the revised surveys which Dunn Engineering will be submitting to the State and upon receipt will forward one to you. Please let us know if you have any comments on this matter. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD enc. Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 23, 1987 Francis J. Murphy~ Supervisor Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Intersection of S.R. 25 and Main Street, Greenport Dear Supervisor Murphy: With regard to the ongoing concern of the Town Board about the above-noted intersection, the Planning Board has been notified that the proposed residential development of the Breakers at Lands End (N/s of S.R. 25, 1139' E/o Sound Road, Greenport),is in the process of applying for a curb cut permit onto S.R. 25. The State is requiring the applicant to provide updated traffic impact studies regarding this intersection. See enclosed copy of NYSDOT letter. The Planning Board has requested the applicant to send the Town copies of the information being sent to the State so that we may keep abreast of the situation. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. c~cerely~ Valerie Sco~az~ Town Planner cc: Ray Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways H. Daniel Winters, Chief of Police Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1988 October 20, 1987 James O. Frein, Civil Engineer III Department of Transportation State of New York NYS Office Building Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787 Re: Breaker's at Lands End Route 25, Southold Dear Mr. Frein: With regard to the above-named application, you should be aware that portion of this property is zoned for business. The applicant is seeking to develop the southwest corner of this site as a large retail shopping mall. Since the Town Planning Board has not yet received a formal application for this proposal, it is unable to include a specific site plan proposal at this time. Sincerely, Town Planner T~,Ds Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 19, 1987 Dunn Engineering, P.C. 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Re: Breakers at Lands End Route 25, Southold Dear Hr. Dunn: With regard to the New York State Department of Transportation's request for information as stated in Mr. James O. Frein's letter of October 14, 1987 (copy enclosed) please send to the Southold Town Planning Board a copy of the revised site plan and impact study that you are sending to the State. Valerie Scopaz~ Town Planner enc. October 14, 1987 , J[tlOLD T JWN P CT 1 1987 DATE Dunn Engineering, P.C. 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Dear Mr. Dunn: The Breakers at Land's End Route 25~ Southold Your September 21~ 1987 Submission We have completed our review of the subject Traffic Impact Study, as you requested. The study discusses an eastbound left turn lane into the site from Route 25. This must also be shown on a plan sheet. The impact of such a left turn lane on existing parking must be assessed. Concrete curbing must be used along Route 25 instead of block curbing. In 1985, the Orient Ferry has increased its service, adding capacity with additional vessels and hourly service between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. during the summer months. However, the recommendations in your Traffic Impact Study were based on 1984 volumes which do not reflect the improved ferry service. More recent counts must be obtained and evaluated. Since the Route 25-Sound Avenue intersection is only one quarter mile west of the subject site and your Traffic Impact Study indicates that 90% of site traffic will pass through this intersection. This impact must be addressed. The developer may be required to reconstruct the Route 25-Sound Avenue flashing signal and/or provide appropriate pavement widenings for turning lanes. The maps presented with the Traffic Impact Study indicate a total of four sections whereas the 350 units discussed in the study constitute only three of those sections. The Traffic Impact Study must be revised to address all four sections, including any additional access onto Route 25. On page 19 of the Traffic Impact Study, the Saturday figures for exiting traffic seem low. The 10% distribution to the east on page 22 seems inap- propriate in light of the aforementioned increased ferry service and Orient State Park, which may attract additional traffic. Please submit four copies of a revised Traffic Impact Study containing the following: Ounn Engineering, P.C. page 2 October 14, 1987 'turning movement counts for each driveway intersection with the state highway for the li highest hours of an average day. B. Turning movement counts for each adjacent intersection on the highway system for 8 highest hours of an average day. C. Three years of current accident data, including accident typo and description. Delay studies at each driveway intersection where a permit signal is requested. These delay Stndies must be performed during the morning peak hours, the mid-day peak hours, and the afternoon or evening peak hours. ITE Trip Generation Mmnuai data for each type of land use w~.thin the site. F. Capacity analyses using the 1985 Highway Capacity ilsnual. G. Time-Space Diagrams if a proposed signal will affect existing signals. We will also require 10 copies of detailed site plans incorporating the following inforn~ation: Location and dimensions of existing highway pavement, curb, sidewalk, median, median openings, guide rail, utilities, traffic signs, right-of-way lines and property lines. Existing and proposed buildings and appurtenances. Design features to be incorporated in proposed construction or reconstruction: 1. Width, pavement type and thickness of driveways. 2. Radii of driveway returns and other points of curvature. 3. Oriveway grades or profile view of driveway. 4. Angle of driveways relative to the roadway center line. 5. Dimensions of roadside control islands and driveway medians. 6. Dimensions and elevations of curb and sidewalk relative to tile edge of pavement. 7. location of authorized traffic signs and proposed advertisement signs. 8. gxisting and proposed pavement markings. O. Existing and proposed drainage features: I. Size, type and grade of driveway culverts. 2. liighway drainage structures. 3. Direction of surplus water flow on applicant's property. Ounn Engineering, P.C. page 3 October 14, 1987 E. Distance from each existing and proposed driveway on the site to: 1. The nearest side road in each direction if within 1000 feet. 2. The nearest driveway on adjacent properties. 3. Streets, roads, or driveways opposite the site. 4. Adjacent property lines. F. North directional arrow on each applicable sheet. Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plans and/or figures cited from Part 302 of the New York State Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. We will recommend any necessary lane closing restrictions. To allow for snow and ice control along the jobsite by State forces, the contractor shall schedule his work in accordance with the following: No drums, cones, barricades and other traffic control equipment shall remain in a location where they will interfere with or be disturbed by a snow plowing operation. The work must be scheduled to afford the safe removal of such devices when necessary. Drainage frames, grates and covers shall not be adjusted in a travel lane unless the final pavement course is placed prior to the onset of snow and ice weather. Steel plates, etc. shall not protrude above the adjacent pavement. If any of these protrasions exist in a non-travel lane prior to a snow and ice condition, then temporary asphalt ramps must be placed so that for every one inch of rise, there is a six foot run of ramp. Details of internal traffic circulation, parking, traffic control devices and any proposed additional pavement lanes or widening. For major projects involving such pavement work, the plan sheets must be standard 22 inch by 36 inch size and placed in the order specified on page 21-3 of the New York State Highway Design Manual. Oversize sheets with cluttered or illegible information are not acceptable in any case. Ail submissions must be prepared by a licensed professional engineer, architect or land surveyor. Please send these materials to Mr. H. R. Thyberg, regional permit engineer, at the above address. If you have any questions, kindly contact Mr. Ja~s Lentini of my staff, who is coordinating our review, at (516) 360-6020. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, JA~S O. FREIN Civil Engineer III Valerie Scopaz~ September 24, 19E7 Dunn Engineering, P.C. 66 Main Street Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Dear Mr. Dunn: The Breakers at Land's End Routs 25~ Southold Your September 21~ 1987 Submission Our review of the subject plans and Traffic Impact Studies will be co- ordinated by Mr. James Lentini of my staff who can be contacted at (516) 360-6020 should any questions arise. For us to complete our review, we require seven additional copies of the plans for circulation to involved Regional groups. Please forward these as soon as possible. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, T. C. HOFFMAN Regional Traffic Engineer Ms. Valerie Scopaz~ CC: T~{:JH:BT FILE COPY T ~ LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 August 18, 1987 Mr. Richard Lark Attorney at Law Main Road Cutchogu~ NY 11935 RE: "Breakers at Lands End" Dear Mr. Lark: Please let this confirm the following action taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, MOnday, August 10, 1987. WHEREAS.this Board adopted a resolution one,the 6th day of July 1987 relating to the final site plan of "Breakers at Lands End" and Whereas the owner of the premises is conformity with the aforementioned resolution is desirious of entering into an agreement with the B~ard condirming the provision of the resolution and to signify the owners acceptance of the terms of the resolution, now, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Planning Board is hereby authorized to sign the final site plan of "Breakers at Lands End" and to execute the agreement between Greenport Development Corp. and this Board relating to the July 6 resolution of this Board, and be it further resolved that a signed copyof this agreemetn be filed with the minutes of this Board as well.as being filed in the "Breakers at Lands End" Planning Board file. ~~35~ Enclosed is a copy of the endorsed agreement for your files. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary S L'CF,, E O-L K'zC 0. ~U~.,,T Y Southold, N,Y. 11971 (516) 765q958 August 18, 1987 Mr. Richard Lark Attorney at Law Main Road Cutchogu~ NY 11935 RE: "Breakers at Lands End" Dear Mr. Lark: Please let this confirm the following action taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, August 10, 1987. WHEREAS:this Board adopted a resolution one,the 6th day of July 1987 relating to the final site plan of "Breakers at Lands End" and Whereas the owner of the premises is conformity with the aforementioned resolution is desirious of entering into an agreement with the Board condirming the provisio~ of the resolution and to signify the owners acceptance~of the terms of the resolution, now, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Planning Board is hereby authorized to sign the final site plan of "Breakers at Lands End" and to execute the agreement between Greenport Development Corp. and this Board relating to the July 6 resolution of this Board, and be it further resolved that a signed copyof this agreemetn be filed with the minutes of this Board as well.as being filed in the "Breakers at Lands End" Planning Board file. SCTM # 1000-35-1-25. Enclosed is a copy of the endorsed agreement for your files. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.u, CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary : SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: BENNEO~Tthe /~ day of to~m~wn1987w~obe~eO~ m~ perso~nally came ORLOWSKI, JR., , , g y me auly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at Stillwater Avenue, Cutchogue, New York; that he is the Chairman of the PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, which is described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said PLANNING BOARD; that the seal so affixed to said instrument is such seal; that it was so affixed by order of the PLANNING BOARD, and that he signed his name thereto by~~~.~~ h~',%~~, P~P,£1C, S~a~e ci ~'~,~ '~or~ -4- THIS AGREEMENT made the /;0~ day of August, 1987, between GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CO., a New York partnership, having its principal office at 53 Glen Cove Road, Greenvale, New York 11548 (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER"), and the PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, with office at 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 (hereinafter referred to as the "PLANNING BOARD"). WHEREAS, the OWNER, is a partnership consisting of Bruce Wolowitz and Goldie Wolowitz, as successors in interest to GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CORP., and as such have title to a certain parcel of land lying and being at Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, by virtue of a deed dated December 31, 1986 and which is recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on January 28, 1987 in Liber 10231, page 438, and is more fully described on the attached Schedule A; and WHEREAS, the PLANNING BOARD at a regular meeting on Septem- ber 15, 1986, approved the site plan for "The Breakers at Lands End" located at New York State Route 25, Greenport, New York, for construction of 350 condominium units and amenities as indicated on the site plan dated December 2, 1985 (Sheets 1-25) by Steven Hyman, Consulting Engineer, subject to the following conditions: Condition #1 Covenants and restrictions filed with the of- fice of the County Clerk that the roads within this develop- ment will remain private and will not be offered for dedica- tion and will not be under the jurisdiction of the Southold Town Highway Department. Condition #2 Posting and acceptance by the Town Board of a performance bond in the approved amount of $100,000.00 for bluff plantings for the Long Island Sound bluff stabilization and erosion control on the site. -1- Condition ~3 Receipt of an insurance policy naming the Town as an additional insured with regard to the unfenced ponds. Condition #4 A one-year review by the Planning Board and inspection prior to the issuance of a certificate of occu- pancy. and WHEREAS, the OWNER has complied with: Condition #1, by recording a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on February 11, 1987 in Liber 10247, page 250, and delivering certified copy to the PLANNING BOARD on February 11, 1987. a Condition ~2, by delivering to the PLANNING BOARD on February 11, 1987, Performance Bond No. NR17688 issued by The North River Insurance Company in the amount of $100,000.00, which was accepted by the PLANNING BOARD at a regular meeting on March 30, 1987, and referred to the Southold Town Board, which Performance Bond was accepted by the Southold Town Board by Resolution at a regular meeting on April 7, 1987. Condition ~3, by delivering to the PLANNING BOARD on February 11, 1987, a Certificate of Insurance issued Febru- ary 4, 1987, by General Accident Insurance Company naming the Town of Southold as additional insured as respects pro- ject at Route #25, Greenport, Southold, New York (unfenced ponds). and WHEREAS, the parties desire to facilitate the administration of Condition ~4 in that the development of the site plan for the 350 condominium units and amenities will take longer than one year to complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The OWNER agrees, and in all respects consents to cooper- ate with the scheduling and completion of on-site inspections and engineering reviews of the work as it progresses on the site plan and condominium project. -2- 2. The OWNER agrees to reimburse the PLANNING BOARD for the expenses it incurs in obtaining the on-site inspections and engi- neering reviews by Engineers or Consultants employed by the PLAN- NING BOARD for this purpose, up to but not to exceed a cost of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND ($25,000.00) DOLLARS, of which FIVE THOU- SAND ($5,000.00) DOLLARS was previously paid to the PLANNING BOARD on August 5, 1986, the receipt of which is acknowledged. The OWNER agrees to make such payments to the PLANNING BOARD within thirty (30) days after receipt of a copy of a voucher authorizing payment by the PLANNING BOARD. 3. This agreement shall be binding upon the undersigned, its successors and assigns. STATE OF NEW YORK: : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: ss.: GREENP¢~RT DEVELOPMENT /CO. /Y ! 'Bruce Wolowitz ~ Par~n~--~,/ By~~~~~PLANNING BOARD, TO~O~LD ~:Trm~f:Jrlowski , Jr/ On the 10th day of August , 1987, before me personally came BRUCE WOLOWITZ, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and who, being duly sworn by me, did depose and say that he is a member of the firm of GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CO., a co-partnership, and that he executed the foregoing instrument in the firm name of GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CO., and he had authority to sign the same, and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of said firm for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.:~___ ~,_~ .~, No/tgry Public BREAKERS AT LANDS END: August 10, 1987 WH_REAS this Board adopted a. resQlution on the 6th day of July 1987 relating to the final site plan of "Breakers at Lands End" and WHEREAS the owner of the premises in conformity with the aformentioned resolution is desirous of entering into an agreement with the Board confirming the provision c~ the resolution and to signify the owners acceptance of the terms of the resolution, now, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Planning Board is hereby authorized to sign the final site plan of "Breakers at Lands End" and to execute the agreement between Greenport Development Corp. and this Board relating to the July 6 resolution of this Board, and be it further RESOLVED that a signed copy of this agreement be filed with the minutes of this Board as well as being filed in the "Breakers at Lands End" Planning Board file. THIS AGREEMENT made the /O~ day of August, 1987, between GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CO., a New York partnership, having its principal office at 53 Glen Cove Road, Greenvale, New York 11548 (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER"), and the PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, with office at 53095 Main Road, outhold, New York 11971 (hereinafter referred to the as "PLANNING BOARD") . WHEREAS, the OWNER, is a partnership consisting of Bruce iWolowitz and Goldie Wolowitz, as successors in interest to :GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CORP., and as such have title to a certain parcel of land lying and being at Greenport, in the Town of iSouthold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, by virtue of a eed dated December 31, 1986 and which is recorded in the Suffolk ICounty Clerk's Office on January 28, 1987 in Liber 10231, page 438, and is more fully described on the attached Schedule A; and WHEREAS, the PLANNING BOARD at a regular meeting on Septem- ber 15, 1986, approved the site plan for "The Breakers at Lands End" located at New York State Route 25, Greenport, New York, for :onstruction of 350 condominium units and amenities as indicated ~n the site plan dated December 2, 1985 (Sheets 1-25) by Steven !Hyman, Consulting Engineer, subject to the following conditions: Condition #1 Covenants and restrictions filed with the of- fice of the County Clerk that the roads within this develop- ment will remain private and will not be offered for dedica- tion and will not be under the jurisdiction of the Southold Town Highway Department. Condition #2 Posting and acceptance by the Town Board of a performance bond in the approved amount of $100,000.00 for bluff plantings for the Long Island Sound bluff stabilization and erosion control on the site. -1- Condition #3 Receipt of an insurance policy naming the Town as an additional insured with regard to the unfenced ponds. Condition #4 A one-year review by the Planning Board and inspection prior to the issuance of a certificate of occu- pancy. ~nd WHEREAS, the OWNER has complied with: Condition 91, by recording a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on February 11, 1987 in Liber 10247, page 250, and delivering a certified copy to the PLANNING BOARD on February 11, 1987. Condition ~2, by delivering to the PLANNING BOARD on February 11, 1987, Performance Bond No. NR17688 issued by The North River Insurance Company in the amount of $100,000.00, which was accepted by the PLANNING BOARD at a regular meeting on March 30, 1987, and referred to the Southold Town Board, which Performance Bond was accepted by the Southold Town Board by Resolution at a regular meeting on April 7, 1987. Condition #3, by delivering to the PLANNING BOARD on February 11, 1987, a Certificate of Insurance issued Febru- ary 4, 1987, by General Accident Insurance Company naming the Town of Southold as additional insured as respects pro- ject at Route ~25, Greenport, Southold, New York (unfenced ponds). ~nd WHEREAS, the parties desire to facilitate the administration )f Condition ~4 in that the development of the site plan for the 350 condominium units and amenities will take longer than one year to complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The OWNER agrees, and in all respects consents to cooper- ate with the scheduling and completion of on-site inspections and engineering reviews of the work as it progresses on the site plan and condominium project. -2- 2. The OWNER agrees to reimburse the PLANNING BOARD for the expenses it incurs in obtaining the on-site inspections and engi- neering reviews by Engineers or Consultants employed by the PLAN- NING BOARD for this purpose, up to but not to exceed a cost of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND ($25,000.00) DOLLARS, of which FIVE THOU- SAND ($5,000.00) DOLLARS was previously paid to the PLANNING BOARD on August 5, 1986, the receipt of which is acknowledged. The OWNER agrees to make such payments to the PLANNING BOARD within thirty (30) days after receipt of a copy of a voucher authorizing payment by the PLANNING BOARD. 3. This agreement shall be binding upon the undersigned, its successors and assigns. t~Bruce Wolow~tz PLANNING BOARD, TOW~NyOZLD B Y~~ '/~'~'owsk i, jr.;~ Chairman / STATE OF NEW YORK: : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: ss.: On the 10th day of August , 1987, before me personally came BRUCE WOLOWITZ, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and who, being duly sworn by me, did depose and say that he is a member of the firm of G~ENPORT DEVELOPMENT CO., a co-partnership, and that he executed the foregoing instrument in the firm name of G~ENPORT DEVELOPMENT CO., and he had authority to sign the same, and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of said firm for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.~ ~~ .' Not,~y Public, ~/ MARY MU NOTARY PUBIC, ~ATE OF NEW YORK NO. I~C~ - ~F~ COUNTY STATE OF NEW YORK: : SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: BENNEO~Ttho~/ows~KI ,dajYR.°~ ~~wnl9, 87w~o,be~negm~yp~s~lsYw~;~e, did depose and say that he resides at Stillwater Avenue, Cutchogue, New York; that he is the Chairman of the PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, which is described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said PLANNING BOARD; that the seal so affixed to said instrument is such seal; that it was so affixed by order of the PLANNING BOARD, by like d r. and that he signed his name thereto ~_~_~ ~otary Pub3~ NOiaR', PUBLIC, State o/ ./~v Yor~ ~, 7'~'32500~, Suffolk COU,-,'.; -4- SCIIEDULK A' ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, bounded and described as follows~ BEGINNING at a granite monument set on the northerly side of the North Road at the southwesterly corner of the land now or formerly of H. Dwight Ripley, being the southeasterly corner of the premises herein described; running thence along said northerly side of North Road, South 66" 01' 20" West 634.76 feet to land now or formerly of Schofield and McIntosh; thence along said land now or formerly of Schofield and McIntosh, four courses and distances:~ (1) North 11" 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; thence (2) North 19" 16' 00" West 344.00 feet; thence (3) South 65" 47' 10" West 213.37 feet; thence (4) South 19" 16' 00' East 550.14 feet to said northerly side of North Road; thence along said northerly,side of North Road two courses and distances: (1) South 65" 23' 50" West 285.49 feet; thence (2) South 66" 36' West 589.52 feet to land now or formerly of Time Structures Inc.; %hence along said land now or formerly of Time Structures, Inc. four courses and distances: (1) North 41" 39''10" West 1084.54 feet; thence (2) North 65" 07' 50" East 376.40 feet; thence (3) North 32" 28' 10" West 982.87 feet; thence (4) North 32" 57' West 410.00 feet to the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound; thence along the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound seven courses and distances as follows= (1)'North 44" 12' 40" East 564 feet; (2) North 25" 16' 40' East 398.12 feet; thence (3) North 58" 57' 20" East 601.09 feet; thence (4) North 42" 36' 50" East 169.85 feet; thence (5) North 57" 59' 40"East 188.68 feet; thence (6) North 41" 51' 20" East 322.22 feet; thence (7) North 31" 15' 10" East 483.72 feet to land now or formerly of F.F. King, Jr.; running thence along said land now or formerly of F.F. King, Jr., the following 14 courses and distances: (1) South 30" 10' 40" East 910 feet; thence (2) South 31" 03' 40' East 300.01 feet; thence (3) South 28" 19' 30" East 89.61 feet; thence (4) South 13" 46' 30" East 33.68 feet; thence (5) South 27" 56' 50" West 65.47 feet; thence (6) South 0" 19' 40" East 179.94 feet; thence (7) South 1" 34' 00" East 300.20 feet; thence South 0" 04' 20" East 100.93 feet; thence (12) South 7" 02' 00" East 155.11 feet; formerly of King and land now or 34' 30" East 805.00 feet to the (8) South 3° 40' 00" East 100 feet; thence (9) West 172.71 feet; thence (10) South 5" 18' 40" thence (!1) South 0° 39' 30s East 100.15 feet; 1" 45' 00" East 434.17 feet; thence (13) South 40.19 feet; thence (14) South 76° 49' 10" West tbence along said land now or formerly of Ripley, South 24" point or place of BEGINNING. District 1000, Section 035.00, Block 01.00, Lot 025.000 RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD - P. O. BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK 11935 August 17, 1987 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 ATT: Diane Schultze RE; The Breakers at Land~s End - Site Plan Dear Diane: ~' Pursuant to your/~lephone conversation with my office today, I am enclos~=~___t~?_s~s__!.25 sheets each) of the approved Site Plan'for the above-mentioned project. If you need additional sets, please let me know. Very-'-t'~Y yours, Richard F. Lark RFL/mld Enclosures Sidney B. Bowne, P,E.. ES. (1922-1959) Chester C Kelsey. P.E.. L.S. A~exandre W. Mercil. P.E. Robert A. Stanton, P.E. Robert W, Brown. L.S. Zabdiel A. Blackman, P.E.. L.S. George A. Style, PE. Jerry D. Almont. P.E. George k Fagan, Jr,, Ph.D., P.E. Frank Capobianco, C.E. Thomas R. Pynchon, ES. SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 (516) 724-0611 July 31, 1987 Roland Anders Roger L, Cocchi Francis J, Lynch Philip Schlotzhauer M~ Bennet Orlowski, J~, Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: "The Breakers at Lands End", Town of Southold, N.Y. (SBB #87108) Gentlemen: We are in the process of reviewing the drainage plans for the above referenced project. Because of the complexity of the drainage and pond system, we have arranged to have a meeting with the designer, Steve Hyman during the second week of August to discuss the design. A brief summary of the areas in which design modifications or explana- tions will be discussed is as follows: After this meeting, project 1. The high water level of Pond "I" in relation to the road; 2. Test hole data; 3. Restricted flow into ponds due to the pipes being surcharged; 4. Design of overflow weirs and pipes; 5. Under design of pipe system into Pond "C"; 6. Existing topographic conditions to the southwest of Pond the possible elimination of drainage pip~ we will further update you on the status "G", and of this JWK:clg Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS /JOHN W. KOHN MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER RECEIVED BY DATE Sidney B. Bowne. P.E., L.S. (1922-1959) Chester C Kelsey, P.E., L.S. Alexandre W. MerciL P.E. Robert A. Stanton. P.E. Robert W Brown. L.S. G~orge A. Style, P.E. Jerry D Almont, PE George L. Fagan, Jr., Ph.D., P.E. Frank Capobianco, CE. Thomas R. Pynchon, L.S SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON 45 Manor Road Smithtown. N.Y. 11787 (516) 724-0611 July 31, 1987 Roland Anders Roger L Cocchi Francis J. Lynch Philip Schlotzhauer Joseph F Stegman Paul F Stevens William T Styne Richard S Weber Mr. Bennet Orlowski, J~, Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: "..~___'--_.~ ..... ~ ..... .-~Town of Southold, N.Y. (SBB #87108) Gentlemen: We are in the process of reviewing the drainage plans for the above referenced project Because of the complexity of the drainage and pond system, we have arranged to have a meeting with the designer, Steve Hyman during the second week of August to discuss the desig~ A brief summary of the areas in which design modifications or explana- tions will be discussed is as follows: 1. The high water level of Pond "I" in relation to the road; 2. Test hole data; 3. Restricted flow into ponds due to the pipes being surcharged; 4. Design of overflow weirs and pipes; 5. Under design of pipe system into Pond "C"; 6. Existing topographic conditions to the southwest of Pond "G", and the possible elimination of drainage pip~ After this meeting, we will further update you on the status of this project JWK:clg Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS ~JOHN W. KOHN RECEIVED BY BOARD DATE MINEOLA · SMITHTOWN · NEW YORK CITY · CLEARWATER July 29, 1987 Richard Lark, Esq. P.O. Box 973 Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Lark, I acknowledge receipt of yours of July 23, 1987. I have not pulled my file to check the specific wording of the Planning Board Resolution, but assuming the Agreement tracks the Resolution, it seems fine to me. My thinking would be, however, that the Agreement should recite the fact that Greenport Development Co. is the owner of the premises described in the site plan and that the Agreement would be binding upon the heirs, successors, and assigns, etc. of Greenport Development Co. Also, I believe that the Agreement should contain a statement as to Mr. Wolowitz's capacity as a partner and the names of his co-partners in this venture, unless they have been already identified in a filed disclosure statement. Very truly yours, FJY;dkw CC: Town of Southold Planning Board Henry Raynor FRANCIS J. YAKABOSKI P. D T~~]LDi( Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 16, 1987 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattit~ck, NY 11952 Re: Breakers at Lands End Site Plan SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Raynor: Please let this confirm the following action taken by:~the.Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, July 6, 1987. RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board be and hereby is authorized to sign the final site plan for the Breakers at Lands End, dated December 1986, indicating final site plan approval by this Board pursuant to Chapter 100 Section 100-130 and following of the Town Code of the Town of Southold, subject to the owner/developer of the aforesaid project consenting to further engineering review with respect to the proposed drainage facilities and fruther subject to the owner/developer consent to and cooperating with continuing on-site inspections and engineezing reviews during the course of construction and subject further to the consent of the owner/developer to pay the expense and disbursements of such engineering review and inspection by engineers designated by the Planning Board of the Town of Southold at a cost not to exceed $25,000 which consent shall be in writing, and further subject to the road width being twenty eight feet (28!) as previoulsy discussed and agreed by the owner/developer. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. ~ery truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN ,c]ou'Ti4OT,F) qW)W~ PT,AN'~T'~ Rf)ARD RESOLVED THAT THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD BE AND HEREBY IS AUTHORIZED SiTE PLAN TO SIGN THE FINAL ~ OF THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END, DATED DECEMBER 1986, INDICATING FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL BY THIS BOARD PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 100 SECTIONS 100 -130 AND FOLLOWING OF THE TOWN CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUBJECT TO THE OWNER/ DEVELOPER OF THE AFORESAID PROJECT CONSENTING TO FURTHER ENGINEERING REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE FACILITES AND FURTHER SUBJECT TO THE OWNER/DEVELOPER CONSENT TO AND COOPERATING WITH CONTINUING ON-SiTE INSPECTIONS AND ENGINEERING REVIEWS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION AND SUBJECT FURTHER TO THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER/DEVELOPER TO PAY THE EXPENSES AND DISBURSEMENTS OF SUCH ENGINEERING REVIEW AND INSPECTION BY ENGINEERS DESIGNATED BY THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AT A COST NOT TO EXCEED $25,000 WHICH CONSENT SHALL BE IN WRITING; AND'FURTHER SUBJECT TO THE ROAD WIDTH BEING 28' AS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED AND AGREED TO BY THE OWNER/DEVELOPER. VOTE OF THE BOARD; AYES: ORLOWSKI, MULLEN, LATHAM, WARD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 'July 16, 1987 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Breakers at Lands End Site Plan SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 Dear Mr. Raynor: PleaSe let this confirm the following action taken byuthe Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, July 6, 1987. RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board be and hereby is authorized to sign the final site plan for the Breakers at Lands End, dated December 1986, indicating final site plan approval by this Board pursuant to Chapter 100 Section 100-130 and following of the Town Code of the Town of Southold, subject to the owner/developer of the aforesaid project consenting to further engineering review with respect to the proposed drainage facilities and fruther subject to the owner/developer consent to and cooperating with continuing on-site inspections and engineering reviews during the course of construction and subject further to the consent of the owner/developer to pay the expense and disbursements of such engineering review and inspection by engineers designated by the Planning Board of the Town of Southold at a cost not to exceed $25,000 which consent shall be in writing, and further subject to the road width being twenty eight feet (28,) as previoulsy discussed and agreed by the owner/developer. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. ~ery truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 25, 1987 Mr. Robert Brown Sidney Bowne and Son Mineola, NY Re: The Breakers at Lands End Dear Mr. Brown: Pursuant to our meeting on this date, enclosed is the following with regard to the above mentioned site plan for your review and information: 1. copy of the scenic easement agreement 2. copy of the covenants and restrictions 3. copy of the long enviroinmental assessment form 4. copy of the water and sewer contract from the Village of Greenport. 5. site plan by Steve Hyman, P.E. We hope this is helpful to aid in your review and report with regard to this site plan. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 20, 1987 APR O 1987 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516} 765-1801 $outhold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gent lem en: The Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on April 7, 1987, accepted the performance bond in the amount of $100,000 for bluff plantings for the condominium proposal to be known as"Breakers At Lands End" located at Greenport, provided the bonding company, The North River Insurance Company, is authorized to do business in the State of New York. Today I received the attached "Certificate of Solvency under Section 1111 of the New York Insurance Law" certifying that the company is auth- orized to transact the business of insurance in New York State, so you may consider the $100,000 bond accepted by the Town Board. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry $outhold Town Clerk Attachment cc: Richard Lark, Esq. CERTIFICATE OF SOLVENCY UNDER SECTICN llll OF '£~ NEW YORK INSURANCE LAW STATE OF NEW YORK INSURANCE DEPARTMENT JAMES P. CORCORAN SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE It is hereby certified that THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMP.~iqy of Morristown, New Jersey, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and duly authorized to transact the business of insurance in this State, is qualified to become surety or guarantor on all bonds, undertakings, recognizances, guaranties and other obligations required or permitted by law; and that the said corporation is possessed of a capital and surplus including paid-in and contributed surplus and unassigned funds (surplus) aggregating the sum of $129,871,646~(Capital $2,500,000.), as is shown by its sworn financial statement for the year ended December 31, 1985 on file in this Department, prior to audit. The said corporatLon cannot lawfully expose itself to Loss on any one risk or hazard to an amount exceeding 10% of its surplus to poli~fholders, unless it shall oe protected in excess of that amount in the manner provided in Section 4118 of the Insurance Law of this State. In Witness Whereof, .! have hereunto set ~f hand and affixed the official seal of this Department at the City of Albany, this 31st day of July, 1986. ~/?erintenden~ of rnsucance JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 9, 1987 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Roger A. Ouigley, Vice President The North River Insurance Company 492 Franklin Avenue Nutley, New Jersey 07110 Dear Mr. Quigley:_ The Town of Southold is in receipt of Bond No. NR17688, $100,000.00, Greenport Development Corp. (copy enclosed) issued by your company. Please submit :to this office an official certification that The North River Insurance Company is authorized to do business in' the State of New York. Thank you. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosure cc: Southold Town Planning Board Richard Lark, Esq. THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE CCMPANY ~ Franklin Ave. Nut~ley, New Jersey 07110 BOND NO. NR17688 $ 100,000.00 KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, the undersigned Greenport Development Corp. as Principal, and The North River Insurance Ccr~pany a corporation of the State of New Jersey and authorized to do business in the State of New Jersey, as Surety, are hereby held and firmly bound unto the Town of Southold, New York , as Obligee, in the penal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars & no cents. ($ 100,000.00 ) Dollars for the payment of which, well and truly to be made we hereby Jointly and severally bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. WMEREAS, it is proposed to make certain Sub ~ivision "The Breakers at Lands End" Greenport, New York WHEREAS, the Town of Southold, New York execution and delivery of this bond. has approved said plan upon the NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounden Principal shall construct the improvements shown above, and complete said work to satisfaction of the Town of Southold, New York and in accordance with the present standard specifications of the Town of Southold, New Yorktherefore, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise the same remain in full force and effect; it being expressly understood and agreed that the liability of the Surety for any and all claims hereunder shall in no event exceed the pena of this obligation as herein stated. . Signed, sealed and dated thi~ 10th of February, 1987 -Witness The North River InsUrance Company /. '~ Surety Robert A. Ni~o~ia~A~~t r THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY TOWNSHIP OF MORRIS, NEW JERSEY STATEMENT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1985 ASSETS Bonds .............. $ 513,964,826 Stocks: Preferred .......... $ 14,590,835 Common .......... 195,137,447 209,728,282 Real Estate .......... 35,561,528 LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS Losses and Adjustment Expenses .......... $ 616,384,2~1 Taxes and Ex oenses .......... ! 4,810,019 Co~:~¥¥ or...__~ ............. ~ ss .~ On d,is~ // ? , dayof ~__~..4.g..,C~t~.~.~ 19/"~before me personally wiH~ whom I am person~quaioted, who, being by ~ly'sworn, aid depose and say: , Tha, he resides a~... ~~ ~}~(~_..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~}~}~ of he ~ ..................... ...................................... the corporation ~escribe~ in an~ hicn exeeutecl the mregoing instrument; that ~e ~no~ the corporate se¢~ ~ said corporation; H~at the seal thereto affixed is such corporate seal; that it is so affixed by order of~ Board o[ Did/rs, and that he signe~ his name t~reto by like order. /~ GEORGE J. RACHMIEL, Senior Vice President & Treasurer and MICHAEL A. SANDRI, Assistant Vice President of The North River Insurance Company being duly sworn, each for himself deposes and says that they are the above described officers of the said Company and that on the Mst day of December, 1985 the Company was actually possessed of the assets set forth in the foregoing statement and that such assets were available for the payment of losses and claims and held for the protection of its policyholders and creditors, except as herein- before indicated, and that the foregoing statement is a correct exhibit of such assets and liabilities of the said Company on the 31st day of December, 1985 according to the best of their information, knowledge and belief, respectively. Sworn to and Subscribed before me this 2nd day of April, 1986 CYNTHIA JO STEHLI NOTARY PUBLIC OF NEW JERSEY My Commission Expires Dec. 13, 1988 Sertior Vice President & Treasurer Assistant kTce President SOWER OF ATTORNEY THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY PRINCIPAL OFFICE, TOWNSHIP OF MORRIS, N.J. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY ("Company") a corpora- tion duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and having its Principal office in the Township of Morris, State of New Jersey, has made, constituted and appointed, and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint Robert A. Nicosia, Richard L. Quackenbush, Mary L. Paluzzi, and Margaret A. Nicosia, of Nutley, New Jersey, each its true and lawful Agent(s) and Attorney(s)-in-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name, place and stead, to execute, seal. acknowledge and deliver: A.~.y and all bonds and g_,~.dertakin~ .......... ~ ..... and to bind the Company thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its principal office in their own proper persons. This Power of Attorney limits the act of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent therein stated. This Power of Attorney revokes all previous powers issued in b~half of the attorney(s)-in-fact named above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The North River insurance Company has caused these presents to be signed and attested by its appropriate officers and its corporate seal hereunto affixed this 6th day of August ,19 85. L - Attest: ~-~l' AssJstant~Secret~fV Richard A. Annese STATE OF NEW JERSEY) COUNTY OF MORRIS ) THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY // Roger A. Quigl~y / On this 6th day of Au$llst 19 85 , before the subscriber, a duly qlJalified Notary. P,~t~jt~J~#!l~.tate of New Jersey, came the above-mentioned Vice President and Assistant Secretary of The North Riverajj~urljtc~J~/, to me personally known to be the offtcers described in, and who executed the preceding instru- me_~,_~,~ they ack~ed the execution of the same. and being by me duly sworn, deposed and said. that they are ,he of~ oN~T~m~foresaJd, and zhat the seal ~ffJxed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said C~pany, ~ald C= ' ' ' ' ' ' -or, rate Seal and their signatures as officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument b~ aut~L~---- ~dir~n of the said Company. ' IN ~NY~F, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal at the Township of Morris, the day and year first~ ¢~a~ri~,~' ~A1 /Y J ~E (Signed) NOTARY PUBLIC 0F NEW J[RSEY ~ ~. ~~ ~Seall ~y Commission Expires Oct ~4. [g87 ~ ~ ~,~ ,u~ This Power of AttorSey is granted pursuant to Article V. of the By-Laws of THE NORTH RIVER INSURANC-'" COMPANY." now in full force and effect. ARTICLE V., Execution of Instruments: "The Chairman of the Board, Vice-Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice- President. in conjunction with'the Secretary, or any Secretary, if more than one shall be appointed by the Board, or an Assistant Secretary, shall have power on behalf of the Corporation: (a) to execute, affix the corporate seat manually or by facsimile to, acknowledge, verify and deliver any contracts. obligations, instruments and documents whatsoever in connection with its business including, without limiting the foregoing, any bonds, guarantees, undertakings, recognizances, powers of attorney or revocations of any powers of attorney, stipulations, policies of insurance, deeds, leases, mortgages, releases, satisfactions and agency agreements; ,~ (b) to appoint, in writing, one or more persons for any or all of the purposes mentioned in the preceding paragraph (a), including affixing the seal of the Corporation," This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed under and by the authority of Article iV., Section 9. of the By-Laws of THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY as now in full force and effect. ARTICLE IV. Section 9. Facsimile Signatures: "The signature of any officer authorized by the Corporation to sign any bonds, guarantees, undertakings, recognizances, stipulations, powers of attorney or revocations of any powers of attorney and policies of insurance issued by the Corporation may be printed facsimile, lithographed, or otherwise produced .... The Corporation may contmue to use for the purposes herein stated the facsimile signature of any person or persons who shah have been such officer or officers of the Corporation, notwithstanding the fact that he may have ceased to be such at the time when such instruments shall be issued." CERTIFICATE State of New Jersey County of Morris I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full force and effect and has not been revoked and furthermore that the above quoted abstracts of Article V. and Article IV., Section 9. of the By-Laws of the Company are now in full force and effect. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this lOth day of February 19 8.7 B g~_/~. A$$,ll~*~t Secretary John K. Stewart Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 2, 1987 Mr. Richard Lark Attorney at Law P.O. Box 973 Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Breakers at Land End 'Dear Mr. Lark; The ~ollowing action was Board, Monday, March 30, 1987. taken by the Southold Town Planning RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept and refer to the Town Board for acceptance the performance bond in the amount of $100,000 for bluff plantings for the condominium proposal to be known as "Breakers At Lands End" located at Greenport. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Judith T. /w bond Terry RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD - P. O. BOX 973 CUTCHOGUE, NEW YORK ! t935 February 11, 1987 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr.-Chairman RE: Breakers at Lands End Dear Mr. Orlowski: Pursuant to the Planning Board resolution dated September 15, 1986 in connection with the above-captioned matter, I am enclosing the following: Certified copy of recorded Covenants and Restrictions dated November 26, 1986 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on February 11, 1987 in Liber 10247 Page 250. 2. Performance Bond in the amount of $100,000.00. 3. Insurance Certificate with regard to unfenced ponds. If all is in order, kindly mark the site plan approved to enable the owner to obtain the necessary building permit. RFL/bd Enclosures C Mark J. Jacoby Assoc. 2/4/87 NO RIGHT~ UPON 'HE CERTIFICAT: HOLDER. ~ C ~I/~-IC&T E DOES NOT A MEND, EXTEND O~ ALTE~ I THE COVEAAGi! AFFORDED BY ~E FOUClED BELOW. COII~IPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY & General Accident Ins. LE ~I'ER E 7 Old Westbury d. East Hills, NY 11577 INSJR~ Southwood Construction Corp. & Greenport Development Corp. et 53 Glen Cove Road Greenvale, N.Y. 11548 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR 1'HE POUC Y PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDINQ ANY REQUIREMENT, TER~ OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAJN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. POLIC~ EF~ECTI~ POU~Y EX~RATE~fl [ L~81LI~ LIMITS IN T~N~ ~PE OF INSURE POLICY NUMBER ~TE (~ ~ ~ ~ ~CURRE~E I AGGRE~ C~EHENSNE m~ i~uRY $ 5 0 0 5 0 cintra GL0104314 3/1/86 HIRED A~ PmO~ JUMBREL~mRM ~C 42907 3/[/~6 3/1/87 m&PD~mNED $3,000 $ 3,0 ~ ~C 0118784--0[ 3/[/~6 3/[/87 F~nR (EACHA~IDEN~ DE~RIPTIONOF OPERATION~TIO~;~VE~IC~SP~CI~i~MS Town of Southo±a ~nCluaea as additional insured, as at Route #2.5, Greenport, Southold, NY (unfenced ponds) Town of Southold Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 respects project ISHO~l.O ANY ~ T~ ~ ~ ~ M ~D ~ ~ ~- PIRAT~ DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO ~ ~ u DAYS ~ ~ TO ~ ~1~ H~ NA~ TO T~ ~ ~Y KI~ ~N T~ ~YI ~ A~ OR ~TAT~, ~ AU~D ~PRE~ ~/~' , ' , T ~ LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 31, 1986 Mrs. Ralph B. Blackman 74 Glenside Road Murray Hill, NJ 07974 Re: "Breakers at Lands End" Dear Mrs. Blackman: We are in receipt of your correspondence of October 27, 1986. In reply to your question, the developers are not claiming Island's End Golf and Country Club as their open land. Enclosed is a clearer map indicating the site for the Breakers at Lands End project; as you can see the Island's End Golf is a separate parcel. Upon review of the file, a golf course is not proposed as an amenity of this condominium proposal. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board dms. enc. 10247 ? 250 · 1000 Dist. 035.00 Sec. 01.00 Blk. 025.000 Lot DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS DECLARATION made this 26th day of November, 1986, by GREENPOR DEVELOPMENT CORP., with principal offices located at 53 Glen Cove Road, Greenvale, New York, hereinafter called the "Owner"; WHEREAS, the Owner has title to certain land situate, lying and being at Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, by virtue of a deed dated July 16, 1984 and which was recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on July 20, 1984 in Liber 9604 Page 529, and is more fully described in attached Schedule A. WHEREAS, portions of said land were the subject of a site plan application submitted to the Southold Town Planning Board known as 'The Breakers at Lands End" for site plan approval; and WHEREAS, on September 15, 1986, the Southold Town Planning Board approved the application for site plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the above-described premises shall be subject to the following covenants and restrictions: 1. All the roads within the site plan known as "The Breakers at Lands End" will remain private, and will neither be offered for dedication to the Town of Southold nor will be under the _ jurisdiction of the Southold Town Highway Department. 2. Declarant does hereby further warrant, covenant and represent the foregoing restrictions and agreement shall bind the undersigned, its heirs, successors and assigns, and any and all 10247 person or persons who shall succeed to the ownership of said )remises or any part thereof by transfer or otherwise. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has caused his hand and affixed the day first above wri~ ?i~kp~~ GRE~ DEVE ~ruce Wolowit z ~residen~ NEW YORK: t '~ : SS. OF SUFFOLK: STATE OF NEW YORK CountyofSuffolk ' -=--~ m~ ~ersonally came I, JULIETTE A. KINSELLA, Clerk of the County of Suffolk and Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of New York in and for said County (said Court being Court of Record) HEREBY CERTIFY thai I have COmpared the ann a and that it is a just and true copy of such .... , (~,..,...~_,..~,,.~,~/~ 2~ ~, p ;o ~ 5_r3 of the who~e thereof. '~ and original IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF ~ have hereunto set my hand and affixed the s County and Court th s // day of ~ ealofsaid Form No. 104 ' ' . ...... ~7 Clerk. 10247 SCHEDULE A cid. ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, bounded and described as follows~ BEGINNING at a granite monument set on the northerly side of the North Road at the southwesterly corner of the land now or formerly of H. Dwight Ripley, being the southeasterly corner of the premises herein described; running thence along said northerly side of North Road, South 66" 01' 20" West 634.76 feet to land now or formerly of Schofield and McIntosh; thence along said land now or formerly of Schofield and McIntosh, four courses and distances:, (1) North 11' 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; thence (2) North 19' 16' 00" West 344.00 feet; thence (3) South 65' 47' 10" West 213.37 feet; thence (4) South 19' 16' 00" East 550.14 feet to said northerly side of North Road; thence along said northerly side of North Road two courses and distances: (1) South 65° 23' 50" West 285.49 feet; thence (2) South 66° 36' 40" West 589.52 feet to land now or formerly of Time Structures Inc.; thence along said land now or formerly of Time Structures, Inc. four courses and distances: (1) North 41' 39''10" West 1084.54 feet; thence (2) North 65" 07' 50" East 376.40 feet; thence (3) North 32" 28' 10# West 982.87 feet; thence (4) North 32" 57' 20" West 410.00 feet to the ordinary high water mark of Long Islan~ Sound; thence along the ordinary high water mark of Long Islan~i Sound seven courses and distances as follows= (1)'North 44" 12' ' ~ 40" East 564 feet; (2) North 25" 16' 40' East 398.12 feet; thence (3) North 58" 57' 20" East 601.09 feet; thence (4) North 42' 36' 50" East 169.85 feet; thence (5) North 57" 59' 40"East 188.68 feet; thence (6) North 41" 51' 20" East 322.22 feet; thence (7) North 31' 15' 10" East 483.72 feet to land now or formerly of F.F. King, Jr.; running thence along said land now or formerly of F.F. King, Jr., the following 14 courses and distancesl (1) South 30" 10' 40" East 910 feet; thence (2) South 31" 03' 40" East 300.01 feet; thence (3) South 28" 19' 30" East 89.61 feet; thence (4) South 13" 46' 30# East 33.68 feet; thence (5) South 27' 56' 50" West 65.47 feet; thence (6) South 0" 19' 40" East 179.94 feet; thence (7) South 1" 34' 00" East 300.20 feet; thence (8).South 3" 40' 00" East 100 feet; thence (9) South 0" 04' 20" West 172.71 feet; thence (10) South 5" 18' 40" thence (11) South 0" 39' 30" East 100.15 feet; 1' 45' 00' East 434.17 feet; thence (13) South 40.19 feet; thence (14) South 76' 49' 10" West thence along said land now or formerly of King formerly of Ripley, South 24' 34' point or place of BEGINNING. East 100.93 feet; thence (12) South 7" 02' 00" East 155.11 feet; and land now or 30" East 805.00 feet to the District 1000, Section 035.00, Block 01.00, Lot 025.000 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ~CORD & RETURn] TO: RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT I. AW MAIN ROAD -- P. O, BOX Yir~. R~lp~ B. Blackman 74 Gle~,sld~ Road ~,rr~y H;I1, Nc,* Jersey 07974 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 October Z7, 1986 Dear Mr. O~lowski: As a Southold Town taxpayer (property owner; e. g., my home at 4045 Route 25, Greenport, and 22 acres of Island's End Golf jointly owned with my sister), I am writing you concerning the proposed development "Breakers at Lands End." I am referring to the article "350 Condominiums Planned in G'port" in the Oct. 15, 1986, issue of SUFFOLK LIFE. The ar~cle states, "... the development will include two ponds. A recreation area will include a clubhouse ........ , ..., golf course, .... " The article includes a small map with the caption," .... The Project .... , will be broken into four phases as depicted in the gray area on the map." East of the gray area on the map is indicated as Golf Club. That certainly appears to be Island's End Golf and Country Club. Are the developers claiming Island's End Golf as their open land in order to have permission to build $50 condominiums on their property? I expect to be in Greenport the week of Nc~ember 10. sister and I would like to talk with you during that week, if you prefer not to answer this t~ter. My Sincerely yours, CC: Mrs. Dennington GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CORP. 53 Glen Cove Road Greenvale, New York 11548 January 16, 1987 Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor Town Board of the Town of Southold Town Hall - Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Supervisor Murphy and Members of the Town Board: I have just read in a local newspaper that the Southold Town Master Plan Update is in final form. As you and members of the Town Board will recall, we are the owners of property on the northerly side of State Route 25, Greenport, New York, known as the Brecknock Hall property, Suffolk County Tax Map District 1000, Section 035.00, Block 01.00, Lot 025.000. We were greatly disappointed as to what is being proposed in the Zoning Plan Update for portions of our property which is presently zoned "B" Light Business District and contains 12.436 acres. It was my impression that the existing multiple residence and business zoning on the premises were to remain in effect with the Master Plan Update. I know last Fall when I was shown the proposed Master Plan Update Maps this was so. I cannot understand the recent change unless it is a mistake, as I consider the proposed change of zone of the business portion of our property to Residential Office (RO) District as illegal and either demon- strates a lack of understanding or good faith on the part of the Town Board in even considering such a proposal at this stage of the development of the property. Experience in the past has shown me the Town Board is not totally aware of what transpires in the Planning Board as far as the planning and development of certain properties in the Town. I believe a succinct statement of the background of the zoning history and planning of the development of this property is in order. In 1971 the entire property was rezoned from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to what is now "M" Light Multiple Residence District for 132.08 acres, and "B" Light Business District for 12.436 acres. At the time of the initial rezoning, the Town of Southold entered into a Scenic Easement Agreement with the then owner of the land, Gus Schad, which agreement was recorded on December 13, 1971 in Liber 7066, page 386, which affected 19.271 acres of the Multiple Residence District prop- erty. In addition, covenants and restrictions were given by the then owner that affected portions of the property concerning its Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor -2- Town Board of the Town of Southold January 16, 1987 development, and were recorded on December 13, 1971 in Liber 7066, page 382 and Liber 7066, page 377. In fact, the last- mentioned covenants provided that no new buildings would be erected on the business portions of the property until 25 living units were erected in the multiple residence district and these restrictions run until January 1, 2000. The point of this is the Town of Southold did not have zoning legislation to provide for planned unit development of property as one zone district. Therefore, through the mechanism of various types of zoning districts and agreement, the entire tract of land was treated and handled as a planned unit development by the Town authorities. When our company became interested in developing this prop- erty in 1982, it became apparent that in order to accommodate what the Southold Town agencies envisioned as a proper planned unit development for the property, it was necessary to rezone to Multiple Residence District, the remaining "A" Residential sec- tions of the prior zoning plan and to amend the Scenic Easements as well as sQme of the covenants and restrictions. This was accomplished on December 13, 1983 and the Scenic Easement was amended by Agreement with the Town of Southold which was recorded in Liber 9637, page 169, which affected 37.92 acres of property, and the amendment of the Covenants and Restrictions which was recorded in Liber 9506, page 263. Although more expen- sive to develop, the net effect of these amendments was to im- prove on the planned unit development concept and to buffer the business zoned portion of the property with the scenic easement, and move the residential development further north on the prop- erty. The changing of the covenants and restrictions limits the density of the Multiple Residence District to 350 new dwelling units. It is noted however, the covenants which directly affect the business district, specifically limiting any new construction until 25 new residential units are built remained in effect, as a recognition both on our part as well as the Town that this busi- ness property was to be used in conjunction with the Multiple Residence District as basically small retail shopping district to primarily serve the new dwelling units that were to be con- structed. This explains why we have coordinated and directed our planning efforts first to the Multiple Residence District por- tions of the property, although sketch plans of the business district have been submitted and reviewed by the Planning Board. It is essential for proper traffic flow, the buffering of the business area from the Multiple Residence District, the.installa- tion of the water, sewer and utilities and amenities, that the entire property be planned as one. Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor -3- Town Board of the Town of Southold January 16, 1987 The foregoing explanation is basically conceptual. Now for the hard economic facts. In reliance of the planned unit de- velopment concept for the property which was commenced by the Planning Board and adopted by the Town Board, we have spent up- wards of $350,000.00 in engineering, surveying, land planning, architectural and attorney fees, as well as the cost of well drillers and numerous soil boring tests; not to mention the $360,850.00 given to the Village of Greenport as a down payment on the water and sewage service contracts to serve this property, and the additional sums for the installation and completion of the well field. In September 1986 the Planning Board approved the site plan subject to our filing performance bonds, additional covenants and restrictions, and insurance policies which are in the process of being accomplished. A development of this size requires tremendous financing. Unfortunately, my father, Leo Wolowitz, passed away in January 1986 and although delays encountered in the clearance of his estate have somewhat slowed down actual construction, the finan- cing of the project is in the final stages of completion and we hope to commence construction of the project very shortly. It appears the Hamlet Density Residential (HD) District as adopted is comparable to the existing "M" Light Multiple Resi- dence District and as such we do not have any objection to this proposed Master Plan Update, providing it does not upset or interfere with any of the site plans as previously approved by your Building Department and Planning Board. However, it is clear that the proposed change of the "B" Light Business District to Residential Office (RO) District is totally unacceptable. In reviewing your Master Plan. Update, it would appear that the proper zoning change for the existing business district would be to that of Hamlet Business (HB) District, because this is essen- tially a revision of the Light Business District. The Residential Office (RO) District proposal is a bad joke, and we formally protest same as affects our property. The only permitted uses in this district (RO) are buildings and structures owned or operated by the Town of Southold's school, park and fire districts, and one-family detached dwellings not to exceed one dwelling on each lot. There are presently ten structures inter- spersed on this property, some of which are suitable only for a business use such as was envisioned by the Planning Board in planning this as a neighborhood business district to primarily Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor -4- Town Board of the Town of Southold January 16, 1987 serve the multiple residential dwellings. As I understand it, the permitted uses in the Hamlet Business (HB) District are pretty much the same as the existing Light Business District, such uses being business, professional offices, retail stores, restaurants, personal service stores and shops, which is being planned for the property. In essence, the proposed zoning update to Residential Office (RO) District is not compatible with the planned unit development previously established by the zone changes and agreements with the Town of Southold. As you are well aware, the concept of a planned unit development depends on the interrelationship of the residential needs and the convenience of neighborhood businesses to service these needs. This is clearly not available in a Resi- dential Office (RO) District as proposed. The permitted uses in this district do not allow any recognition of any truly neighbor- hood business portions of the property as a permitted use, but only through special exception, which is in derogation of the previous and current planning on this property. We do not like to interfere with the planning of the develop- ment by the Town, but I cannot stand idly by and allow this pro- posed zoning to destroy many years of planning as well as the expenditures of large sums of money. I invite you to review your Town Board records as well as those of the Planning Board and the Building Department. The originals of all of the above cited agreements, covenants and restrictions are in the official Town records. Also, I would appreciate it if you would review the above with the Town Attorney before you act on the zoning update and affects this particular parcel of land. There is no doubt in my mind that this proposed change of zone from "B" Light Business District to Residential Office (RO) District is a mistake and if passed, is a clear interference of our civil rights and will cause us to act accordingly. If any other Town officials involved with the Master Plan Update have any questions concerning this matter, do not hesitate to contact me as I would be most happy to sit down and discuss same. If I can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, BW/m Bruce Wolowitz, President GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CO. 53 Glen Cove Road Greenvale, New York 11548 February 9, 1987 Members of the Town Board Town of Southold Town Hall - Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Please consider this letter as a formal objection to your proposed rezoning of our 12.436 acres of property currently zoned for "B" Light Business on the property commonly known as "Breck- nock Hall to Residential Office (RO) District (Suffolk County Tax Map District 1000, Section 035.00, Block 01.00, Lot 025.000). I wrote you on January 16, 1987 concerning this matter, but have not heard anything from you. The local newspaper contains a notice that you are conducting a public hearing on February 11, 1987 for the purpose of considering, in whole or in part, the recommendations of the Master Plan Update. I urge you not to implement the Residential Office (RO) District for the 12.436 acres of our property, but rather leave it to the equivalent of the present "B" Light Business District. The reason being, since 1971 to the present, this portion of the property has always been an integrated part of the Planned Unit Development with other portions of the property as reflected by the easements and covenants mutually entered into with the Town of Southold. These bilateral agreements with the Town of Southold in planning the development of the property certainly bind us as owner, and it must bind you as the governing munici- pality. The unilateral change of the agreements on your part is a breach of contract and would therefore be illegal. This is why I firmly believe the designation of this portion of our property as Residential Office (RO) District must have been a mistake or a clerical oversight and that is the reason I wrote you a letter on January 16, 1987. I know you are anxious to pass the Master Plan Update, but please consider this formal protest as a request to review our property and correct the mistake so as to avoid any future~dif- ficulties in this matter and allow us to prgd~ed with ,e~om~e- hensive development of the property. // · v witz BW/m cC: Robert Tasker, Town Attorney ~-40 R-80 HD RO 'RO R-80 R MANOR- P D T LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 September 23, 1986 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Jr. Re: Breakers at Lands End Dear Mr. Raynor: Please let this confirm the following actions taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, September 15, 1986. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board override the resolution of the Suffolk County Planning Commission of July 2, 1986 for the reasons stated by the agent for the developer in correspondence dated July 18, 1986. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site plan for "The Breakers at Lands End" located at NYS Route 25, Greenport for construction of 350 condominium units and amenities as indicated on the site plan dated December 2, 1985 (sheets 1-25) by Steve Hyman, subject to: 1. Covenants and restrictions filed with the office of the County Clerk that the roads within this development will remain private and will not be offered for dedication and will not be under the jurisdiction of ~he Southold Town Highway Department. 2. Posting and acceptance by the Town Board of a performance bond in the approved amount of $100,000 for bluff plantings for the Long Island Sound bluff stabilization and erosion control on the site. 3. Receipt of an insuran6e policy naming the Town as an additional' insured with regard to the unfenced ponds. 4. A one-year review by the Planning Board and inspectfOn prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. It was noted that this project has been certified by the Building Department, and has a signed contract with the Henry E. Raynor Page 2 9/23/86 Village of Greenport for water and sanitary sewer facilities. There was also concern among the Board with regard to the use of ground water for the make-up water for the ponds on the site. Upon receipt of notice that the conditions have been met, the Chairman will endorse the site plan. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , ~CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Richard Lark, esq. T LD/ Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 September 23, 1986 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Jr. Re: Breakers at Lands End Dear Mr. Raynor: Please let this confirm the following actions taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, September 15, 1986. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board override the resolution of the Suffolk County Planning Commission of July 2, 1986 for the reasons stated by the agent for the developer in correspondence dated July 18, 1986. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site plan for "The Breakers at Lands End" located at NYS Route 25, Greenport for construction of 350 condominium units and amenities as indicated on the site plan dated December 2, 1985 (sheets 1-25) by Steve Hyman, subject to: 1. Covenants and restrictions filed with the office of the County Clerk that the roads within this development will remain private and will not be offered for dedication and will not be under the jurisdiction of ~he Southold Town Highway Department. 2. Posting and acceptance by the Town Board of a performance bond in the approved amount of $100,000 for bluff plantings for the Long Island Sound bluff stabilization and erosion control on the site. 3. Receipt of an insurance policy naming the Town as an additional insured with regard to the unfenced ponds. 4. A one-year review by the Planning Board and inspectfOn prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. It was noted that this project has been certified by the Building Department, and has a signed contract with the Henry E. Raynor Page 2 9/23/86 Village of Greenport for water and sanitary sewer facilities. There was also concern among the Board with regard to the use of ground water for the make-up water for the ponds on the site. Upon receipt of notice that the conditions have been met, the Chairman will endorse the site plan. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Richard Lark, esq. ~OUTHOLD September 17, 1986 Hon. Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Change of Zone, Master Plan Update Dear Mr. Murphy: Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you yesterday on the subject of my letters of January 24 and September 15, 1986, copies of which I informed you would be mailed to the Board members. I am mailing those copies to-day with a copy of this letter, which I feel is necessary to amplify my application for the zone change of my property and the property across the street from it, to HD or its equivalent. It was my impression that although you looked with favor on the application, you deemed it inappropriate at this time, because of the additional expense of further modifying the Map which is under consideration. It was suggested that an application for the change should be made after the adoption of the Master Plan. Upon reflection it seems to me that a great deal of time and expense to both me and the Town could be avoided right now by making the requested change. Physically the only change to the Map would be by the addition of the lettering HD to the area affected, just as the Map indicates the Costello property to the west of my parcel, and the smaller parcel just west of it on the south side of the North Road is similarly treated. Accordingly it is my wish that my application receive consideration from you and the Board at this time, and that I be afforded the opportunity to appear before the Board and discuss the matter in depth before any final action is taken on the adoption of the Master Plan. HT/s ~)~'~Y°urs v~,rul~ HENRY TASKER Cardinal Drive Mattituck, NY 11952 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. RE: The Breakers at Islands End August 13, 1986 Dear Mr. Orlowski: In regard to the Planning Board's review to finalize all remaining elements of compliance for the site plan of The Breakers at Islands End, be advised that a check in the amount of $5,000.00 for inspection fee was delivered to the Planning Board Secretary on August 8, 1986, and the following will be delivered to the Planning Board: Stipulation from the Wolowitz Organization that the Town of Southold will be named as additional insured for the liability with reference to the ponds to be located on the site. Stipulation from the Wolowitz Organization that all roads constructed on the site plan will remain private and will not be offered for dedication and will not be under the jurisdiction of the Southold ~own Highway Department. Stipulation from the Wolowitz Organization that a performance bond in the amount approved by the Planning Board of $100,000.00 will be posted. This is specificially for Long Island Sound Bluff Stabilization and erosion control on the site. Due to the length of time necessary to process a performance bond which is being diligently pursued, this Stipulation will voluntarily prohibit the Wolowitz Organization from any capital construction until the posting of the required bond is completed. Very truly yours, Henry E. Raynor, Jr. Cardinal Drive Mattituck, NY 11952 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. RE: The Breakers at Islands End Dear Mr. Orlowski: Pursuant to the on-going discussion with the Planning Board, please consider this a request for an extension of time to obtain approval of the site plan of The Breakers at Islands End, that has been certified for zoning compliance by the Southold Town Building Department. This extension is necessary for the completion of site plan processing as required by all the agencies involved. Very truly yours, Henry E. Rayno~Jr. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING CO~NTY OF SUFFOLK PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE JUL l 1 1986 LEE E, KOPPELMAN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: July 9, 1986 The Breakers at Lands End (Condominium/Multifamily) Northwesterly side of New York State Route 25 (Main Road) approximately 1,139 feet northeasterly from Sound Road, near Greenport, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on July 2, 1986, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Map of The Breakers at Lands End (Condominium/Multifamily)", referred to it pursuant to Section 1333 of the Suffolk County Charter. After due study and deliberation it resolved to disapprove said map for the following reasons: Lack of coordination of business parcel with development of entire tract, particularly as pertains to traffic impact upon the State road. Lack of detailed information on type of split entrance that will be used, the amount of traffic that will be generated, and the impact upon the State highway. There is no indication that an environmental impact statement was prepared for this project. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning File: C-85-13.3 CGL:jk Charles G. L~d, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section cc: J. A. Kinsella, County Clerk VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, L.I.,NEW YORKIl?88 JU[ 21 Cardinal Drive Mattituck, New York 11952 July 18, 1986 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. RE: Wolowitz Organization Breakers at Land's Dear Mr. Orlowski: With regard to the Suffolk County Planning Commission's letter of July 9, 1986, I would strenuously refute these three points of contention: 1. As the plan before the Planning Board is solely for multiple use, the question of developing the business portion of the property should not enter into the Planning Commissions consideration. The business property is situated with total frontage of County Route 48. Traffic from this parcel will be self contained and controlled separately. At the request of the Suffolk County Planning Commission, we hired Walter Dunn ~ Westhampton, P.E., to complete a traffic study, a copy of which has been submitted to your office. I fear this was an exercise in futility in view of the Commission's letter. 2. The question raised as to the split entrance design and its impact on traffic was addressed in both the above-mentioned traffic report and the creation of a turning lane to alleviate congestion. Both of these were again for- warded again to the Planning Commission. 3. This project has been in plan prior to enactment of SEQRA. Any potential impact has been completely addressed by both the Planning and Town Board. It has been resolved through studies, reports, reduced density, and redesign by the Planning Board. This is for your consideration of the above responses. Ve%~ truly yours, Henry R~ynor / Agent fbr Breakers at Land's End S~TY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 16, 1986 Mr. Charles G. Lind Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section Suffolk County Planning Commission Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787 Re: The Breakers at Lands End located at Greenport Dear Mr. Lind: In accordance with your request of June 4, 1986, enclosed herewith are three copies of the final map which indicate that the business property is an out parcel and indicates the emergency access. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING (516) 360-5207 JUN 6 1986 LEE E. KOPPELMAN Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Plat Name: June 4, 1986 Preliminary Final. X Proposed Map of Te--~-~reakers aY Lands End Location: N/wly/s Main Road, N.Y.S. Rte. 25 1139'~ n/e of Sound Road, Greenport, New York. Bar Mr. Orlowski: Please be advised ~hat pursuant to Section 1333, Article XIII of the Suffolk Coan~y Charter, the above referral will not be reviewed by the Suffolk County Planning Commission because of noncompliance with requirements for notice and maps as stipu- lated in Informational Bulletin #8 of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. The material as checked below is required before referral will be reviewed: X 3 copies of final map (updated and in finalized form) 1 copy of preliminary map 1 copy of proposed grading plan 1 copy of proposed road profiles 1 copy of proposed drainage plan 1 copy of topographic map X 1 copy of Suffolk County Pine Barrens Review Commission Report It is felt that the proposed map should be brought up to date and in Other finalized form before being referred to the Commission. Please refer to Commission Report of May 7, 1986 (copy enclosed). NOTE: Maps should be submitted as soon as possible if referral is to be on agenda for the next Commission meeting. .C,['~. , File: 1333-D-84-83.3 CGL:jk Form: SRS-76-O1 Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section 11788 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-193S June 2, 1986 Mr. Charles G. Lind Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section Suffolk County Planning Commission Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Re: Breakers at Lands End Dear Mr. Lind: In accordance with our previous correspondence, enclosed is a copy of the latest traffic study, dated May 1986, for the above mentioned proposal. This should complete the file for this proposal so the Commission may make their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 28, 1986 Mr. Charles G. Lind Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section Suffolk County Planning Commission Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787 Re: The Breakers at Islands End Dear Mr. Lind: In accordance with your request, enclosed are three surveys of the above mentioned site plan showing the emergency access roadway as being part of the condominium. Also, enclosed is a copy of correspondence from Mr. Steve Hyman following his meeting with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. A traffic study will be sent under separate cover. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. May 28, 1986 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall - Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman RE: The Breakers at Islands End Greenport~ New York Dear Mr. Orlowski: Enclosed please find letter from Steve Hyman, P.E, with regard to again answering the requests of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. The emergency access roadway has been shown as in the condominium portion of the site plan. I have attached the Report of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services in regard to 'bake upu water sources and uses in the proposed ponds. I trust this issue will be finally put to rest. With regard to the Suffolk County Planning Commission's suggestion of an updated study on traffic; this will be completed this week and I will forward same at once to your Board, Additionally, in order to expedite this submis- sion, I will follow this up with filing a report to the attention of Charles Lind~ Chief of Subdivision Review Section, Suffolk County Planning Department. As time is of the essence because of an existing estate position, I would earnestly request that the materials be forwarded for the June meeting agenda of the Suffolk County Planning Co~ission, Thank you for your past and present considerations, HER/m Enclosures Yours truly, Henry E. 'Raynor, Jr. ~ent for ~e Breakers STEVEN J. HYMAN, P. E. CONSULTING ENGINEER 31 CARDINAL LANE HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK 11788 (516) 361-6346 May 22, 1986 Mr. Henry Raynor Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: Breakers at Island's End Dear Henry: Pursuant to your request I spoke with Mr. Paul Ponturo, P.E. of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (S.C.D.~.S.) re- garding the make-up water for the proposed ponds at the Breakers. We discussed the fact that the S.C.D.~.S. is currently studying the effects of overpumping from the deep aquifer for water supply purposes and the possibilty of saltwater intrusion from such over- pumping. I explained to Mr. Ponturo that we intend to supply make-up water to the ponds by installing shallow, low capacity wells that will be independent of the proposed public water supply wells. These wells will probably be only thirty (30) feet deep with capacities in the range of ten (10) gallons per minute. We will not be drawing large amounts of water from the deep aquifer to supply make-up water to the ponds. Mr. Ponturo agreed that these wells would have no impact on the drinking water supply, especially since they will be utilized only when the ponds require water to bring levels back up to normal water level. I have also made clarifications on sheet four (4) of the grading and drainage plans to indicate that the emergency access road will in fact be constructed as part of the Breakers project and to indicate that the property zoned Business 2 (12.5 acres) is not part of this project. Enclosed herewith are six (6) prints for your records. Please call if you require any further information. Very truly yours, Steven J. Hyman, P.E. D Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 13, 1986 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 JR. Re: Breakers at Land's End Dear Mr. Raynor: Enclosed is a copy of the decision of the Suffolk County Planning Commission with regard to the above mentioned site plan. As you can see, the Commission is requiring more information prior to their review. Would you please submit the information requested to our office so we may make the necessary referrals. Please contact our office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK May 9, 1986 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53905 Main Road Southold, New York 1197! He = The Breakers at Landts End (Condominium) Northwesterly side of New York State Houte 25 (Main Hoad) approximately 1,139 feet northeasterly from Sound road, near Greenport, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on May 7, 1986, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "The Breakers at Land~s End (Condominium)" referred to it pursuant to Section 1333 of the Suffolk County Charter. After due study and deliberation it resolved to return said subdivision as incomplete for the following three reasons= i. The traffic study is outdated and does not reflect current traffic activity and future traffic impacts. Traffic Study should be updated. 2. The_referral does not fully answer the question of make-up water necessary to maintain the water levels of the proposed ponds. There is concern that the maintenance of the water levels of these ponds by drawing on ground water will have an adverse impact on the aquifer and the ecological balance of the pond. It is suggested that the Suffolk County Department of Health Services be contacted as that agency has recently completed or will soon complete a study of the water supply on the North Fork. That agency's views on the ponds and the maintenance of the water levels in the ponds may be helpful. ..... 2- 9, 1986 -Bennet Orlowsk~, Jr., Chamrman ~ The Breakers at Land's End (Condo~nium) 3. It is felt that the proposed map should be brought u9 to date and in finalized form before bein8 referred to the Com~ission. The final drawing should not show the business par=el as part of the proje=t and should also show whether the emergenuy service road is 9art of the =ondominium or the business oomplex. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning File: C-85-13.2 CGL:gcc Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section cc: J.A. Kinsella, County Clerk DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING CO~ItNTY OF SUFFOLK PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE 1986 LEE E. KOPPELMAN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING May 9, 1986 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53905 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: The Breakers at Land's End (Condominium) Northwesterly side of New York State Route 25 (Main Road) approximately 1,139 feet northeasterly from Sound road, near Greenport, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on May 7, 1986, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "The Breakers at Land's End (Condominium)" referred to it pursuant to Section 1333 of the Suffolk County Charter. After due study and deliberation it resolved to return said subdivision as incomplete for the following three reasons: 1. The traffic study is outdated and does not reflect current traffic activity and future traffic impacts. Traffic Study should be updated. 2. The referral does not fully answer the question of make-up water necessary to maintain the water levels of the proposed ponds. There is concern that the maintenance of the water levels of these ponds by drawing on ground water will have an adverse impact on the aquifer and the ecological balance of the pond. It is suggested that the Suffolk County Department of Health Services be contacted as that agency has recently completed or will soon complete a study of the water supply on the North Fork. That agency's views on the ponds and the maintenance of the water levels in the ponds may be helpful. VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. LI.. NEW YORK I 1 ?88 F~net Orlowski, Jr., Chairman -2- g, lg86 The Breakers at Land's End (Condominium) 3. It is felt that the proposed map should be brought up to date and in finalized form before being referred to the Commission. The final drawing should not show the business parcel as part of the project and should also show whether the emergency service road is part of the condominium or the business complex. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning File: C-85-13.2 CGL:gcc Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section cc: J.A. Kinsella, County Clerk T Q~ ,'~ /~~~ L D Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 10, 1986 Mr. Charles Lind Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section Suffolk County Planning Commission Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787 Re: Breakers at Island End located at Greenport Dear Mr. Lind: The agent for the above mentioned proposal has submitted information to our office regarding the ponds which are proposed. We are forwarding this to you for your information. Also, we are forwarding a copy 9f a traffic study which was conducted for this proposal in 1971. This was in the Town's file and again it is for your information, with respect to the above mentioned proposal. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN By Diane M.Schultze, Secretary enc. STEVEN J. HYMAN, P. E. CONSULTING ENGINEER 31 CARDINAL LANE HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK 11788 (516) 361-6346 April 7, 1986 R 8 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: The Breakers at Islands End Pond Aeration System Project: 85-26 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Enclosed herewith are some photocopies of the manufacturer's literature for the pond aerators that will be utilized on the above referenced project. This information pertains to the aerator indi- cated on sheet 6 of 25 of our recent site plan submission. Without repeating everything mentioned in the enclosed litera- ture, the basic premise of these floating aerators is that algal blooms, aquatic weeds and sludge build-up are prevented by the fact that the aerator provides 3.6 pounds of dissolved oxygen to the ponds per horsepower hour of operation. The addition of this oxygen will prevent eutrophication of the ponds by allowing the bacteria in the pond to breathe and survive, so that they may break down unpleasant odors and organic wastes. We have highlighted certain parts of the enclosed literature that pertain to the environmental benefits of mechanical aeration. As an additional precaution we have manintained minimum pond depths of three (3) feet, in order to further inhibit algae growth at the pond bottoms. Ponds that are less than three (3) feet deep tend to allow too much sunlight to penetrate to the bottom, thereby encouraging algae to bloom more readily. In the event that you require any further information on the above please feel free to call me at our office at any time. Very truly yours, Steven J. Hyman, P.E. We I~l~ke the Solution APR 8 to Water Quality Problems Cn~,stal Clear 1986 The success story of Barebo, Inc. began with a goal to develop more natural, energy efficient and simple methods of treating water quality problems. Through the manufacture of Otterbine® Aeration Systems, Barebo, Inc. has met many of the water management needs of golf courses, parks, retention ponds, recre- ational lakes and waterways as well as wastewater treatment facilities and com- mercial fish farms. With the assistance of a dedicated team of engineers, our product line has grown in less than ten years into one of the largest selections of aerators available to- day. Much of our company's success can be attributed to the fact that we are fam- ily owned and operated. That means that we take pride in every product we pro- duce. After all, it must be good enough to carry the Barebo name. Each year, more people are realizing the many benefits of Otterbine Floating Aerators. In addition to enhancing the natural beauty of its surroundings, an Otterbine Aerator prevents the build-up of algae, aquatic weeds, bottom sludge and unpleasant aquatic odors resulting in cleaner, clearer water. This is accom- plished through a process called aeration. As the Otterbine's spray droplets travel through the air, they absorb atmospheric oxygen, transferring this oxygen to the water as the droplets strike the surface. Hence, the greater the pumping rate, the greater the aeration factor. An Otterbine's oxygen transfer rate (OTR) is approxi- mately 3.6 pounds of dissolved oxygen per horsepower hour. Otterbine Aerators have prevented algae blooms, sludge build-up and weed growth in applications throughout the LI.S. and abroad. These aerators have met the water management requirements of golf courses, parks and schools, hospitals, in- dustrial complexes, cemeteries, housing developments and amusement parks. And, the range of Otterbine applications is continually expanding. Recently, there has been a dramatic in- crease in the variety of aerator systems we offer. More sizes and types are. now available to meet specific pond and lake needs. Although Barebo has enlarged its product line and more than tripled in size, you will find that we still uphold the same commitment to producing quality products that we were founded on. Our pledge is to continue to meet the many needs of our customers and to explore new markets that can benefit from the use of Otterbine Aerators. Natural Water Quality Management Otterbine Aerators are designed to biologically treat the true causes of algae blooms and unpleasant aquatic odors-- poor water quality, Due to the systems' spray and wave*making action, adequate amounts of oxygen are added to and cir- culated through the water with numerous beneficial effects on its appearance and quality. 2 The Otterbine speeds up the bio- degrading process of organic wastes and fertilizer run-off by the addition of oxygen and circofation. The added dissolved ox- ygen helps the bacteria in the pond respire and break down unpleasant odors and organic wastes. The result is clearer, cleaner, odor-free water. Otterbine Aerators greatly inhibit the growth of algae which can gradually destroy oxygen concentra- tions required by all forms of aquatic wildlife (plant and animal), clog irrigation equipment and create an unsightly, stag- nant appearance. By continually cir- culating large amounts of water the aerator prevents thermal stratification. Thermal stratification is the phenomenon where the upper layers of the lake or pond become much hotter than the lower depths. Atgae has a tendency to thrive in Other methods of water quality control, such as algaecides and lake dyes treat the symptoms of poor water quality, algae and unpleasant odor, but fail to manage the root of the problem--poor water quality. The use of expensive and time- consuming chemicals does not solve organic waste and aquatic odor problems and requires that strict government ap- plication regulations be met. Through the use of an Otterbine Aerator, chemical usa is often eliminated or greatly reduced. Aeration systems are an environmental- ly acceptable way to improve water quality by helping to solve problems at the onset and preventing their re-occurrence later. Si es and Capacities These floating mechanical pumps are · compact, self-contained units that range in primary pumping capacity from 80 to 3,000 gallons of oxygen-enriched water per minute--in addition, the secondary circulation currents move 10 times the primary pumping rates. Our small 1/20 horsepower units circulate over 600,000 gallons of water in a 24-hour period, and our largest unit circulates over 20 million gallons per day. Units are available in sizes ranging from 1/20 to ten horsepower. They can be in- stalled in pools as small as 10 feet in diameter with as little as 18 inches of water. This complete, turnkey system is delivered fully assembled and ready for installation. No foundations, external pumps or other costly plumbing fixtures are required. An Otterbine Aerator can be installed by two People in about one hour by simply floating the unit to the desired position, mooring or anchoring in place and connecting the system to on-shore electrical service through a furnished underwater power cable. It is racom- mended that all electrical work be per- formed by a qualified electrician. Aerators designed by Barebo are ideal for use during the entire year. Special cir- culator cap attachments provide operation at below freezing temperatures by cir- culating warm water from the bottom and mixing it with cooler surface waters. This process raises the overall pond temper- ature. The circulator assembly will keep a sufficient area open around the Otterbine to prevent a total freeze-up and winterkill of fish. Enhanced Surroundings Special stain[ess steel Otterbine Aerators can be used in all types of water--from harsh, alkaline desert lakes to brackish salt water. And, the best bonus of ali is the way these aerators enhance their surroundings with dramatic and graceful water sculptures. The grounds of numerous facilities-- golf courses, recreational facilities and amusement parks, industrial complexes and hospitals--have all benefited from the beauty and sound of the softly falling water. Nationwide Dealer Network Begin solving your water quality prob- lems today by contacting one of our many qualified dealers from our nationwide net- work. Through this dealer system and our main Pennsylvania facility, you can be assured of fast, effective service. Our profes- sionally trained personnel can even "trouble-shoot" over the telephone if necessary! Your Otterbine dealer will analyze the specific problems of your lake or pond and prescribe an Otterbine that will efficiently and cost-effectively solve those problems. Factory application engineering services are also available through your Otterbine dealer. S ~'':' LD Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 28, 1986 Mr. Charles G. Lind Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section Suffolk County Planning Commission Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11787 Re: Breakers at Islands End Greenport, NY Dear Mr. Lind: In accordance with your correspondence of March 12, 1986 with regard to the above mentioned proposal, we enclosed the following information. Three sketches of the business parcel with proposed development, as well as the reserved area for widening of the road. A copy of correspondence from Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., agent, addressing the concerns of the Commission with regard to the artificial ponds, the business property,traffice and "out parcel". A copy of the signed water contract from the Village of Greenport. This information should complete the file for the above mentioned proposal. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M.Schultze, Secretary 1986 Cardinal Drive Mattituck, NY March 17, 1986 11952 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Bennett S. Orlowski, Jr. - Chairman RE: The Breakers at Islands End (Wolowitz) Greenport, New York Dear Mr. Orlowski: Pursuant to the request of the Suffolk County Planning Commission, at its meeting on March 5, 1986, on behalf of the owners, I am submitting the following information in con- sideration of their request: 1. With regard to the Commission's comment on the busi- ness property, I am enclosing a sketch showing a proposed layout for this parcel which is reasonable, considering the layout of the existing property, as well as separate access into that par- cel per the request of the Commission. This has not been with- held for any reason other than we have not planned on immediate development as this parcel is separate, and this business pro- perty will not be a part of the condominium development. The proposal is not to be considered as a development application for the business property. It is the owners' present intention to develop this parcel only after a substantial portion of the con- dominium units are constructed. In addition, the Town of Southold has a moratorium at the present time with regard to business-zoned property building permits. 2. Included on the sketch plan are references to a reserved area for the State of New York Department of Transportation to widen the access lane necessary for the left hand turning lane into the ingress of the proposed residential development project. Final configuration will be determined by their engineering staff. 3. Artificial ponds The ponds will have an impervious liner (bentonite), to hold the necessary volume of water indi- cated. We will also be utilizing the road drainage system after filtration for makeup water on these ponds. In addition, we may at specific times require out of our private system makeup water from the upper glacial aquifer with withdrawal wells and pumps. Water tests by Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C. (H2M) indi- cate this will be no burden on the aquifer. Southold Town Planning Board ATT: Bennett So Orlowski, Jr. RE: The Breakers at Islands End (Wolowitz) - Greenport, NY -2- March 17, 1986 4. We have labeled the traffic going into the project as one-way as now noted in the site plan. As you are aware, the Town records contain various traffic studies showing proposed traffic generated by the units and their insignificant impact on State Route 25. 5. The applicant, after diligent pursuit has not been able to purchase the "out parcel". The landscape buffer areas are already clearly indicated and included in recorded documents which are on file in the Planning Board office. An agreement has been reached with the village of Greenport and I am enclosing a copy of the Water Supply and Sanitary Sewage Agreement dated March 7, 1986. It would be appreciated if you would kindly transmit this information via your office to the Suffolk County Planning Department so it may be placed on the agenda for the April 3, 1986 meeting, it would be appreciated. Very truly yours, Henry E~Raynor, yJr. HER/m Enclosures PRODUCER Jacoby Associates, Inc. 7 Old Westbury Rd. East Hills, NY 11577 INSURED Southwood Construction Corp. & Greenport Development Corp. 53 Glen Cove Rd. Greenvale, NY 11548 etal COMPANIES AFrO,~D~NG COVERAGE COMPANY ,,~ LETTER General Accident LE~-ER ~ COMPANY D THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED: NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL TIlE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. TYPE OF INSURANCE GENERAL LIASILITY FORM GL0104314 3/1/87 '~[)~-~R0U'.0 ~;~"~'~ S 250, S 250, EXPLOSION & COLLAPSE HAZARD 3/1/88 '.,~.~w ~- 500, ':; 500, AUTOS ( PR[~ PASS ) -"- ~ UMBREELAF(~qM XC 42907 3/1/87 3/1/88 ...".'~,N~oe'*'~'r $ 3,000,3 3,000, ~NO WC 0118784-01 3/1/87 3/1/88 ~ _1_00, Town of Southold included as additional insured, as respects project at Sound Ave., Greenport, Southold, NY Town of Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 DATE 1000 Dist. 035.00 Sec. 01.00 Blk. 025.000 Lot DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS DECLARATION made this 26th day of November, 1986, by GREENPOR! DEVELOPMENT CORP., with principal offices located at 53 Glen Cove Road, Greenvale, New York, hereinafter called the "OWner"; WHEREAS, the Owner has title to certain land situate, lying and being at Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, by virtue of a deed dated July 16, 1984 and which was recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on July 20, 1984 in Liber 9604 Page 529, and is more fully described in attached Schedule A. WHEREAS, portions of said land were the subject of a site plan application submitted to the Southold Town Planning Board known as "The Breakers at Lands End" for site plan approval; and WHEREAS, on September 15, 1986, the Southold Town Planning Board approved the application for site plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the above-described premises shall be subject to the following covenants and restrictions: 1. All the roads within the site plan known as "The Breakers at Lands End" will remain private, and will neither be offered for dedication to the Town of Southold nor will be under the jurisdiction of the Southold Town Highway Department. 2. Declarant does hereby further warrant, covenant and represent the foregoing restrictions and agreement shall bind the ;undersigned, its heirs, successors and assigns, and any and all )erson or persons who shall succeed to the ownership of said premises or any part thereof by transfer or otherwise. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has caused his hand and to be affixed the day first above writt,~n] STATE OF NEW YORK: ~ ~ : SS. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On the 26th day of November, 1986, before me personally came BRUCE WOLOWITZ, to me known who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at 18 Clinton Lane, Jericho, New York; that he is the President of GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CORP., the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like order. Notary Public CfW. ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a granite monument set on the northerly side of the North Road at the southwesterly corner of the land now or formerly of H. Dwight Ripley, being the southeasterly corner of the premises herein described; running thence along said northerly side of North Road, South 66" 01' 20" West 634.76 feet to land now or formerly of Schofield and McIntosh; thence along said land now or formerly of Schofield and McIntosh, four courses and distances:, (1) North 11" 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; thence (2) North 19" 16' 00" West 344.00 feet; thence (3) South 65" 47' 10" West 213.37 feet; thence (4) South 19" 16' 00" East 550.14 feet to said northerly side of North Road; thence along said northerly side of North Road two courses and distances: (1) South 65" 23' 50" West 285.49 feet; thence (2) South 66" 36' 40" West 589.52 feet to land now or formerly of Time Structures Inc.; thence along said land now or formerly of Time Structures, Inc. four courses and distances: (1) North 41" 39''10" West 1084.54 feet; thence (2) North 65" 07' 50" East 376.40 feet; thence (3) North 32" 28' 10" West 982.87 feet; thence (4) North 32" 57' 20" West 410.00 feet to the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound; thence along the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound seven courses and distances as follows: (1)'North 44" 12' 40" East 564 feet; (2) North 25" 16' 40" East 398.12 feet; thence (3) North 58" 57' 20" East 601.09 feet; thence (4) North 42" 36' 50" East 169.85 feet; thence (5) North 57" 59' 40"East 188.68 feet; thence (6) North 41" 51' 20" East 322.22 feet; thence (7) North 31" 15' 10" East 483.72 feet to land now or formerly of F.F. King, Jr.; running thence along said land now or formerly of F.F. King, Jr., the following 14 courses and distances: (1) South 30" 10' 40" East 910 feet; thence (2) South 31" 03' 40" East 300.01 feet; thence (3) South 28" 19' 30" East 89.61 feet; thence (4) South 13" 46' 30" East 33.68 feet; thence (5) South 27" 56' 50" West 65.47 feet; thence (6) South 0" 19' 40" East 179.94 feet; thence (7) South 1" 34' 00" East 300.20 feet; thence (8).South 3" 40' 00" East 100 feet; thence (9) South 0" 04' 20" West 172.71 feet; thence (10) South 5" 18' 40" East 100.93 feet; thence (11) South 0" 39' 30" East 100.15 feet; thence (12) South 1" 45' 00" Bast 434.17 feet; thence (13) South 7" 02' 00" East 40.19 feet; thence (14) South 76" 49' 10" West 155.11 feet; thence along said land now or formerly of King and land now or formerly of Ripley, South 24" 34' 30" East 805.00 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. District 1000, Section 035.00, Block 01.00, Lot 025.000 DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS RICHARD F. I-ARK ATTORNEY AT [.AW MA]N ROAD -- P. O. ~3OX BOND NO. NR17688 THE NOR~e~RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY _~2 Franklin Ave. Nutley,.New Jersey 07110 $ 100,000.00 KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, the undersigned Greenport Development Corp. as Principal, and The North River Insurance Ccm~pany a corporation of the State of New Jersey and authorized to do business in the State of New Jersey, as Surety, are hereby held and firmly bound unto the Town of Southold, New York , as Obligee, in the penal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars & no cents. ($ 100,000.00 ) Dollars for the payment of which, well and truly to be made we hereby jointly and severally bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. WHEREAS, it is proposed to make certain Sub ~ivision "The Breakers at Lands End" Greenport, New York WHEREAS, the Town of Southold, New York execution and delivery of this bond. has approved said plan upon the NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounden Principal shall construct the improvements shown above, and complete said work to satisfaction of the Town of Southold, New York and in accordance with the present standard specifications of the Town of Southold, New Yorktherefore, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise the same remain in full force and effect; it being expressly understood and agreed that the liability of the Surety for any and all claims hereunder shall in no event exceed the pena of this obligation as herein stated. Signed, sealed and dated thi~ 10th of February, 1987 'vWitnese North River Insurance Ccmlpany ~ Surety Robert A. Nf~(~SiaQ[A~C~~t THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY TOWNSHIP OF MORRIS, NEW JERSEY STATEMENT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1985 ~ASSETS Bonds .............. $ 513,964,826 Stocks: Preferred .......... $ 14,590,835 Common .......... 195,137,447 209,728,282 Real Estate .......... 35,561,528 LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS Losses and Adjustment Expenses .......... $ 616,384,2~1 Taxes and Exoenses .......... 14,810,019 STATE OF .- ~.......~ ............ [ $$: Col:,' ............................. ~ t -"/ .................. i" day of ...... .........,before me personally appeared ............ .................................................................................... with whom ] am person;ddy'3fquaioted_, who, being by m~,d'.uly'sworn, did depose and say: the corporation aescribeo in and ~ g g ; , p . p ' that tbs seal thereto affixed is such corporate seal; that it is so affixed by order offltSg Board qf 'DitrAeigks, and that he signed his name tl~c*reto by like. order, j~' r.:~ ~2 ~:~:~ / ~ ~ ( NotaryPubhc BR (1 ' 2,23--2500, 8-8~ 222747 GEORGE J. RACHMIEL, Senior Vice President & Treasurer and MICHAEL A. SANDRI, Assistant Vice President of The North River Insurance Company being duly sworn, each for himself deposes and says that they are the above described officers of the said Company and that on the 31st day of December, 1985 the Company was actually possessed of the assets set forth in the foregoing statement and that such assets were available for the payment of losses and claims and held for the protection of its policyholders and creditors, except as herein- before indicated, and that t he foregoing statement is a correct exhibit of such assets and liabilities of the said Company on the 31st day of December, 1985 according to the best of their information, knowledge and belief, respectively. Sworn to and Subscribed before me this 2nd day of April, 1986 CYNTHIA JO STEHLI NOTARY PUBLIC OF NEW JERSEY My Commission Expires Dec. 13, 1988 Senior I/ice President & Treasurer Assistant Fh'e PresMent This Power of Attorney is granted pursuant to Article V. of the By-Laws of THE NORTH RIVER INSURANC~ COMPANY., now in full force and effect. ARTICLE V., Execution of Instruments: "The Chairman of the Board, Vice. Chairman of the Board, President, or any Vice- President, in conjunction with'the Secretary, or any Secretary, if more than one shall be appointed by the Board, or an A~sistant Secretary, shatl have power on behalf of the Corporation: (al to execute, affix the corporate seal manually or by facsimile to, acknowledge, verify and deliver any contracts, obligations, instruments and documents whatsoever in connection with its business including, without timiting the foregoing, any bonds, guarantees, undertakings, recognizances, powers of attorney or revocations of any powers of attorney, stipulations, policies of insurance, deeds, leases, mortgages, releases, satisfactions and agency agreements; (bi to appoint, in writing, one or more persons for any or all of the purposes mentioned in the preceding paragraph (al, including affixing the seal of the Corporation." This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed under and by the authority of Article IV., Section 9. of the By-Laws of THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY as now in full force and effect. ARTICLE IV. Section 9. Famimile Signatures: "The signature of any officer authorized by the Corporation to sign any bonds, guarantees, undertakings, recogmzances, stipulations, powers of attorney or revocations of any powers of attorney and policies of insurance issued by the Corporation may be printed facsimile, lithographed, or otherwise produced .... The Corporation may cont]~nue to use for the purposes herein stated the facsimile signature of any person or persons who shall have been such officer or officers of the Corporation, notwithstanding the fact that he may have ceased to be such at the time when such instruments shall be issued." CERTIFICATE State of New Jersey County of Morris I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the fore~3oing POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in fu{l force and effect and has not been revoked and furthermore that the above quoted abstracts of Article V. and Article IV., Section 9. of the By*Laws of the Company are now in full force and effect. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this lOth day of Februar~ John K. Stewart POWER OF ATTOR~ THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY PRINCIPAL OFFICE, TOWNSHIP OF MORRIS, N.J. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY ("Company") a corpora- tion duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and having its Principal office in the Township of Morris. State of New Jersey, has made, constituted and appointed, and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint Robert A. Nicosia, Richard L. Quackenbush, Mary L. ?aluzzi, and Margaret A. Nicosia, of Nutley, New Jersey, each its true and lawful Agent(s) and Attorney(s)-in-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name, place and and to bind the Company thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its principal office in their own proper persons. This Power of Attorney limits the act of those named therein to the bonds and undertakings specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent therein stated. This Power of Attorney revokes all previous powers issued in behalf of the attorney(s)-in-fact named above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF The North River Insurance Company has caused these presents to be signed and attested by its appropriate officers and its corporate seal hereunto affixed this 6th day of AUgUSt ,19 85. Richard A. Annese STATE OF NEW JERSEY) COUNTY OF MORRIS ) ss.: THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY On this 6th day of AU~?2S~ 19 85 , before the subscriber, a duly qualified Notary.~t. ate of New Jersey, came the above-mentioned Vice President and Assistant Secretary of The Norzh RmT~-~rt~heC~ckn~' ie°d~ePeexrsOna ly kno;n t~Omb~e the officers described in, and who executed the preceding instru- ,~,....~ they a_(:_k.~r~c~_~, ecut'on of te sa e, and being by me duly sworn, deposed and said, that they are the of~ o~OT~l~l~mp-_,~,~foresaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said C~[~npany, ~aid Corporate Seal and their signatures as officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument b%t311, auth~[~L~'~'-~ dir~"tj~'n of the said Company. I~r~NY_,,~F, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal at the Township of Morris, the day and year (Signed) NOTARY PUBLIC OF NEW JERSEY ~.~/_/_~, ?? / Planning Board Page 2 12/2/85 West Dublin Realty Cont. Mr. Kapell stated, however, that the price for the lots would be less than what an 80,000 square foot lot would be sold for. Mr. Latham questioned the house and Mr. Kapell stated that the existing house will be restored. Mr. Latham had made an inspection of the premises, however, the other Boardmembers had not. Mr. Orlowski stated that the Board will make an inspection prior to any further action and will take everything brought up into consideration in any recommendation or action. Breakers At Island End -- Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr.,was present, as agent to discuss the site plan for Breakers at Island End located at Greenport. This proposal is for 350 condominimum units on 140 acres. Mr. Raynor stated that the present proposal reflects 3 ½ years of work. Mr. Raynor stated that a tentative contract is to be negotiated regarding furnishing water and sewer on the site, which will cost 1½ million dollars for the upfront money for the contract. Mr. Raynor stated that he had brought a copy of the engineers layout for road profiles, drainage, sewage information which had been previously submitted to the Board for their review. Mr. Raynor noted that the plans reflected the changes as requested by the Planning Board and Suffolk County Planning Commission. Mr. Frank Cichanowicz,Landscape Architect[ was present to discuss the landscape plan he had drawn. Mr. Cichanow~ had drawn a bluff planting schedule and a typical unit landscape schedule. Mr. Steve Hyman, Engineers was also present. Mr. Hyman and Mr. Cichanowicz came before the Board to explain the erosion controll on the bluff. The developers will also bond the project to insure that the bluff is preserved and stablized with minimal erosion. Mr. Cichanowicz explained that there is a 35% erosion on the bluff, and presented aerial photographs of the bluffs. He also presented arendering of a typical cross section on the bluff. He pointed out the aeas of the bluff that are stable and those that are crtical. Mr. Cichanowicz mentioned plantings which would be brought in ie. black pines, small beach plums, spartina and rosa ragusa. Mr. Cichanowicz eestimated that it would cost between $75,000 and $90,000 to stabilize the.slopes.Mr. Cichanowicz stated that most of these plants are on the site and they will be planted in the crevases and areas that are very heaviliy washed out. Mr. Cichanowicz also noted that additional plantings will be required to inhibit pedestrian traffic on the bluff. The slope will be 1 on 6 from the building units to the drainage areas. The pond areas will be planted with bayberry, briches, and beach plum to impede people from going down to the ponds and for aesthetics. Mr. Cichanowicz presented side and front elevations of the units. He explained that the fronts will have slight earth berms and the plantings will be set up to screen each unit. Mr. Ward requested that a 50 scale drawing and planting plan be done for filing purposes as an overall plan. Mr. Cichanowicz stated that he will submit the supplemental plan and leave it for the Board to examine. Mr. Ward stated that that plan could be a supplemental plan, however, another plan should be drawn for filing. Mr. Ward questioned if a sanitary layout had been drawn. Planning Board Page 3 12/2/85 Breakers at Island End cont. - Mr. Hyman explained the plans show the drainage calculations and drainage profiles, however, no sanitary was shown because as of yesterday, no one knew who would be doing the sewage the Village of Greenport of the developers. Mr. Ward questioned who would be doing it. Mr. Raynor stated that they were in a position to have the Village of Greenport approve the contracts. Mr. Orlowski stated that the Board was investigating the possiblity of getting ~n engineer to review the plans and will know by tomorrow about .hiring someone. Mr. Raynor requested that the Board refer the site plan to the Building Department for certification since amendements had been made since the first certification. Mr. Raynor also requested that the Board determine a fee for the bond on the bluff erosion control program. Mr. Raynor stated that the applicant is anxious to start a model on the site. Mr. Raynor also requested permission to let the developer start the rouggh cuts on the site for the model, however he did not think that they could beat the weather at this date. Mr. Ward stated that he wanted to see full site plans and full water and sewer plans prior to beginning any work. Mr. Mullen questioned when the bond would be paid. Mr. Raynor stated that if it is a condition of approval, it will be paid prior to getting a building permit. Mr. Mullen stated that the problem is the time frame since a bond runs for three years and the project will probably take any where from five to six years to complete. Then, the bond will have to be renewed. Mr. Mullen also noted that a fee of $5,000 would have to be put up in escrow for field inspections to site. Mr. Emilita questioned the wells on the site and Mr. Raynor stated that there would be two wells. Mr. Emilita also questioned if the drainage ponds will always have standing water. Mr. Hyman stated that they would always have about 3' of water in them. The Chairman advised the secretary to call the Suffolk County Planning Commission and advise them that the Board is in receipt of new plans. Mr. Emilita questioned if the ponds would be using potable drinking water because it would be a waste of good water. Mr. Hyman stated that the ponds will contain stormwater and if the Board has any ideas regarding this, they would take that into consideration. Mr. Emilita questioned if the roads would be maintained by an association'.~ Mr. Hyman stated that the roads will remain completely private. Mr. Hyman submitted six plans to the Board and the landscaping plans. Mr. Raynor will submit information on the cost of the bluff plantings so that the Board can determine the price for the bond. The Board will Deet with Mr. John Raynor to review whether he can review the plans for the Board. On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site plan of Breakers at Lands End to the Building Department for re-certification. This site plan is for ocnstructio of 350 condominium units located at Route 25, Greenport. Plans dated November 1985. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards 1000 Dist. 035.00 Sec. 01.00 Blk. Lot CORRECTIVE AMENDED GRANT OF SCENIC EASEMENT 5©12 THIS INDENTURE, made this 13th day of December, 1983, by and between BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, a co-partnership, with offices c/o Gus Schad, 690 Deer Park Avenue, Dix Hills, New York, hereinafter called the Grantor, and THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, a municipal corporation having its principal place of business at 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, hereinafter called the Grantee. WHEREAS, there exists a Grant of Scenic Easement agreement covering portions of the Grantor's land, dated July 15, 1971, and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on December 13, 1971 in Liber 706~, page 3§6; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to modify the aforesaid Grant of Scenic Easement by cancelling same and placing in its stead the following Grant of Scenic Easement on other property of the Grantor, more particularly described in Schedule A herein; and WHEREAS, said premises constitute an area of natural scenic beauty and whose existing openness, natural con- dition, or present state of use, if retained, would enhance the present or potential value of abutting and surrounding properties and would maintain or enhance the conservation of natural or scenic resourses; and WHEREAS, the Grantor wishes to grant a scenic easement to the Grantee affecting the premises described in Schedule A; and SU?~I v ' COUNTY WHEREAS, the Grantee deems it to be in the public interest to acquire interest or rights in real property for the preservation of open space and areas to preserve the beauty and natural conditions of lands in the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, Section 247 of the General Municipal Law of the State of New York provides that municipalities, including Towns, may acquire the fee or any lesser interest, development right, easement, covenant or other contractual right necessary to achieve the aforementioned purposes to land within the Town; and WHEREAS, the Grantee in furtherance of the above policy and in accordance with Section 247 of the General Municipal Law, accepts the scenic described in Schedule A. NOW, THEREFORE, in easement affecting the premises consideration of ONE ($1.00) DOLLAR and other good and valuable consideration to the Grantor, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, this agreement wit- nesseth that: 1. The Grant of Scenic Easement agreement dated July 15, 1971 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on December 13, 1971 in Liber 7066, page 386, is hereby terminated and cancelled. 2. The Grantor does hereby donate, grant, transfer and convey unto the Town of Southold, a scenic easement in gross, of the nature, character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over and upon all those certain -2- plots, pieces or parcels of land as set forth and described in Schedule A annexed hereto and made a part hereof. 3. The nature, character and extent of the easement hereby granted is as follows: (a) No buildings or structures shall be erected on the premises, except fencing, utility structures and out- buildings which might be required by municipal agencies for the construction and maintenance~ of communal utilities, water or sewage systems, consisting of a treatment plant, pumping and lift stations and collection system, and other such appurtenances. (b) No lumbering operations shall be conducted on the premises and no trees shall be cut unless dead, diseased or decayed or for the better landscaping of the area or improvement of existing growth or as may be reasonably required in the construction of roads, equestrian trails, recharge areas or communal utility, water or sewage systems; (c) The land shall remain essentially in its natural state, except for landscaping and maintenance such as mowing of grass, the cleaning and removing of debris from the pond areas. (d) No topsoil shall be removed from the premises nor shall sand, gravel or other minerals be excavated therefrom for purposes of sale or use off the premises; nor shall sand, gravel or other minerals be stored upon the premises; -3- ? (e) The Grantee and its authorized agent shall have the right of inspection of the premises for the purpose of assuring itself that the Grantor is not in violation of any of the terms and conditions of this scenic easement, at any time. 4. The nature, character and extent of limitations on the within grant of scenic easement are as follows: (a) The premises shall not be open or available to the public for-general or park use, but shall remain at all times in the exclusive possession of the Grantor, its suc- cessors and assigns in interest, and subject to its or their unqualified right to exclude others therefrom by any and all lawful means, except as indicated in paragraph 3(e); (b) Roads with necessary recharge basins for road drainage may be constructed to provide access to and from surrounding properties of the Grantor, as well as the construction of jogging paths and equestrian trails. (c) The within grant of scenic easement shall in no way affect the right of the Grantor to use the premises, for the uses herein permitted, and to do all such things thereon, not expressly forbidden herein, as a similarly situated landowner might do; (d) All right, interests and privileges of the Grantor granted, the Grantor, in the premises not herein specifically donated, transferred and conveyed, remain and reside with its successors and assigns. -4- 5. The Waiver or acquiescence in any ar~atlon from any part of the restrictions and COvenants herein by the grantee shall be effective only for the particular instance involved and shall not be deemed to limit the Continuing force and effect of the restrictions and COvenants. 6. If the whole or any part of the premises shall be condemned or taken by mlnent domain, then this easement e ' shall forthwith cease without need of any further writing from the date of title vesting in such proceeding. In such event the Grantor shall not be required to repay to any real property taxing authority any taxes reduced or abated as a result of this Scenic easement; nor Shall the value of the premises be limited by this easement; nor shall any part of any award belong to the Grantee. 7. The grantee hereby undertakes to cooperate to the extent legally permissible in having the valuation placed Upon the premises for purposes of real estate taxation taken into account and limited by the restrictions imposed by this Scenic easement, all in accordance with State of New York General Municipal Law ~247. 8. This agreement shall be perpetual and shall be a COvenant running with the land and shall be binding Upon the parties 9. adoption hereto, their SUccessors and assigns. This Grant of Scenic Easement is subject to the of a resolution by the Town Board of the Town of -5- SCHEDULE A ALL those certain plots, pieces and parcels of land, situate lying and being near Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows: PARCEL I: BEGINNING at a point located on the southeasterly portion of the premises being described herein, which point is the northeasterly corner of land of Schofield and McIntosh, and is the following two courses and dis- tances from a monument located on the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25): (1) North 11° 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; and (2) North 19° 16' 00" West 344.00 feet; running thence from said point of beginning along land of Schofield and McIntosh, South 65° 47' 10" West 213.37 feet to a point; thence through land of Brecknock Associates the following two courses and distances: (1) South 65° 47' 10" West 330.84 feet; and (2) South 66° 36' 40" West 765.20 feet to land of Jem Realty Corp.; running thence along said last mentioned land the following three courses and distances: (1) North 41° 39' 10" West 505.36 feet; (2) North 65° 07' 50" East 367.40 feet; (3) North 32° 28' 10" West 290.00 feet; running thence through land of Brecknock Associates the following six courses and distances: (1) North 57° 16' 01" East 652.01 feet; (2) North 2° 50' 30" East 411.75 feet; (3) North 82° 04' 52" East 267.15 feet; (4) South 10° 34' 40" East 472.04 feet; (5) North 88~ 32' 59" East 360.75 feet; (6) South 23" 51' 43" East 1,123.11 feet to the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25); running thence along the northerly side of North Road South 66° 01' 20" West 252.76 feet to land of Schofield and McIntosh; running thence along said last mentioned land the following two courses and distances: (1) North 11~ 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; thence (2) North 19° 16' 00" West 344.00 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 31.8212 acres. PARCEL II: BEGINNING at a point located at the northwesterly corner of the premises being described herein, which point is distant the following seven courses and distances from the point on the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25) where the southeasterly corner of land of Jem Realty Corp. joins the south- westerly corner of land of Brecknock Associates: (1) North 41° 39' 10" West 1,084.54 feet; (2) North 65° 07' 50" East 367.40 feet; (3) North 32° 28' 10" West 982.87 feet; (4) North 32° 57' 20" West 410.00 feet; (5) North 44° 12' 35" East 564.01 feet; (6) North 25° 16' 36" East 398.13 feet; (7) North 58° 57' 15" East 471.09 feet; running thence from said point of beginning along the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound the following two courses and distances: (1) North 58° 57' 15" East 130.00 feet; thence (2) North.42° 36' 45" East 169.85 feet to land of Brecknock Associates; running thence through said last mentioned land the following eight courses and distances: (1) South 39° 32' 27" East 250.54 feet; (2) South 3° 43' 35" West 234.96 feet; (3) South 35° 57' 18" East 163.60 feet; (4) South 3° 13' 04" West 277.09 feet; (5) South 57° 49' 51" West 255.05 feet; (6) North 31° 02' 45" West 300.00 feet; (7) North 5~ 13' 27" East 382.02 feet; thence (8) North 38° 52' 02" West 183.71 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 6.1046 acres. Southold, subject execution of this to a permissive referendum authorizing the amended Grant of Scenic Easement. This document is recorded in order to correct an error in the Amended Grant of Scenic Easement recorded in Liber 9506 cp 268, wherein the third course following the beginning point in Parcel II was incorrectly described as South 29° 32' 27" East 250.54 feet instead of South 39° 32' 27" East 250.54 feet. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this 13th day of July, 1984. STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: Gus Schad~, Partner\ ~F~nci~~ J./MUrph.y' ~ On the 13th day of July, 1984, before me personally came GUS SCH~, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and who, being duly sworn by me, did depose and say that he is a member of the firm of BRECKNOCK ~SOCIATES, a co-partnership, and that he executed the foregoing instrument in the firm name of BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES and that he had authority to sign the same, and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of said firm for the uses and purposes therein men- tioned· ~~~.~~ N~ary Publid ~ R~CHARD F. LARK NOTARY PURLIC, State of ~ew Yor~ Ne. 52-74~2500 · Suffolk County~ -6- STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On the 14th day of Aug~t, 1984, before me came FRANCIS J. MURPHY, to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at (no 9) old Main Road, Mattituck, New York; that he is the Supervisor of the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, the municipal corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said municipal corporation; that the seal affixed is such seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Town Board and that he signed his name thereto by like order. -7- CORRECTIVE AMENDED GRANT OF SCENIC EASEMENT BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, Grantor and THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, Grantee o L~ ~o RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD -- P, O. BOX 97~4 TRAFFIC FOR THE AT LANDS IMPACT STUDY BREAKERS END TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NEW YORK PREPARED FOR WOLOWITZ ORGANIZATION BY DUNN ENGINEERING, P~C. MAY 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic INTRODUCTION .... Purpose of Report Location . · · Area Map .... Location Map . · Site Map . . · S%UDY APPROACH ......... EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK ................ Roadway Descriptions ............... Major Intersections ................ Grades and Sight Distances ............. Accident Records ................ EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW CONDITIONS ............ Traffic Volumes ................. Available Gaps ............... EXISTING EMERGENCY SERVICES . . . SITE TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS . . DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS . . . ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS ACCESS EXAMINATION ...... CONCLUSIONS APPENDIX .......... Traffic Volume Counts Page 9 10 10 10 11 12 13 13 16 18 2O 23 26 28 30 32 PURPOSE OF REPORT This Traffic Impact Study contains the results of a traffic engineering ex- amination of the proposed development of The Breakers at Lands End. This re- port has been prepared to assess the impact of the proposed development of 350 condominium housing units. This report appraises the traffic aspects of the proposed development with particular emphasis on its impact on the surrounding street and highway network. LOCATION The Breakers at Lands End will be located on the north side of New York State Route 25, approximately 1,140 feet east of Sound Road in Greenport, within the Town of Southold in Suffolk County, New York. Figure 1, Area Map, indicates the location of the Town of Southold in the New York Metropolitan area. The project site is shown in Figure 2, Location Map, while Figure 3, Site Map, presents the boundaries of the property and the adjacent roadway network. At present, the property is undeveloped. -2- ROCKLAND N.J. )ND WESTCHESTER BRONX QUEENS KINGS CONN. NASSAU LONG ISLAND SOUND SUFFOLK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD G~EENPOR?~ AREA FIGURE 1 MAP DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. lATE: ~AGE: 1"-, 7.4ml MAY 1988 3 FIGURE 2 I ! LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE 4 ISGOLF'ANDND COUNTRY CLUB FIGURE 3 m SITE MAP NOT TO SCALE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As part of the preparation of this Traffic Impact Study, the following tasks were undertaken: Several personal, o~-site field observations were made to observe the traffic movements under various conditions. 2. A physical inventory was made of the adjacent street network. An analysis was made of the traffic volume data obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation. An examination was made of the traffic flow on State Route 25. Also, the available capacity of the surrounding street network was determined. 5e An evaluation was made of the safety factors by reviewing sight dis- tances and available safe gaps in the traffic flow. 6. The availability of police and fire protection services was examined. A trip generation analysis was performed to determine the additional traffic attributable to the proposed development of The Breakers at Lands End. A directional distribution analysis was made to distribute the' site- generated traffic onto the surrounding street network. A trip assignment analysis was performed to examine the composite traf- fic volumes, that would result due to the addition of the site-generated traffic to the existing traffic volumes, in order to determine the traf- fic impacts on the surrounding roadways. 10. A review of the access arrangements was made· -7- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 12. Discussions were held with representatives of the New York State Depart- ment of Transportation and the Town of Southoid to review the traffic aspects of this project. Conclusions were made of the traffic impact of the development as a re- suit of the data and facts gathered in this study. -8- TRAFFIC STUDY Prepared for MP. Gus Schad Prepared by John A. Jacobsen Assocs. March 1971 March 8, 1971 Mr. Gus Schad 690 Deer Park Avenue Dlx Hills, New York Dear Mr. Schad: Brecknock Hall Development Greenport, New York In accordance with your ~quest, we have studied The general accessibility, circulation and traffic characteristics for the development of p~operty located on the north side of Route 25 (Main Road) immediately west of the Islands End Golf and Count~5, Club, G~eenport, New York. The acreage will be divided to p~ovide for approximately 100 single family residential units, 385 townhouse-~welling uaits, 5000 squar~ feet of office spac~ and 10,000 square feet of neighborhood shopping space. The major means of access to the site is from North Road and Main Road from the west. These two roads join nea~ GPeenport, and Main Road continues to Orient Point. Orient Point is the easterly Tip of the noz~th fork of Long Island, however, fez~'ies operate from this location to New London, Connecticut and Plum Island. AT p~esent, Main Road consists of two-ten foot concz~te travel lanes with 7 foot asphalt shoulders. No traffic signals a~e located near the subject parcel and the speed'~kmit in this a~ea is 50 MPH. No other ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - SANITARY ENGINEERING . INDUSTRIAL WASTE TREATMENT TRAFFIC E/NGINEERING . CIVIL ENGINEERING 'traffic control exists at the present time. - Main Road was studied to determine characteristics such as hourly traffic volumes, roadway cepacl~y and 1Aft turn opportunities of existing traffic and traffic which would he generated hy the development of this parcel. TRAFFIC VOLUME STUDY The State of New York Department of Transportation placed automatic traffic counters on Route 25 (Main Road) between Manhasset Avenue and Stifling Court. O~e counter registered all eastbound vehicles and another counted all westbound vehicles. The counts were started Friday, May-29, 1970 and continued through Wednesday, June 3, 1970. The results of these counts wer~ plotted on Exhibits #1 ~hrough ~6 entitled "Hourly Variation of ~A~fic Volumes". Friday, May ~gth through Sunday May 31st co~stltuted the Memorial Day weekend which would exhibit higher~ than normal traffic volumes. From ~0:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. o~ Friday, May 29th, .the traffic volume remained fairly steady with between 200 and 300 vehicles travelling in each direction per hour. On Saturday the volumes increased to approximately 350 vehicles per hour in an easy. bound direction between 3:00 P.M. and 5:00 P.M. Sunday, May 31st, Memorial Day. be, ween ~:00 P.M. and 8:00 P.M. indicates an expected westbound re~urn flow after ~he holiday weeker~. The volumes during this period ranged between ~0 and 370 vehicles per hour. Monday, June let to Wednesday, June 3rd, 1970 the traffic volumes dropped considerably, varying between 100 and 200 vehicles per hour per direction.' Slight commuter peaks can be distinguished between 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 A.~. in the eastbound direction and he,ween ~:00 P.M. and $:00 P.M. in the westhound direction. ¢ ( 1500 1400 1300 1200 1100 1000 9OO 8OO 7OO 6O0 5OO 4OO 300 ,, ooo ooOOOO ooooooOOz HOURLY VARIATION OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES COUNTS TAKEN 24 HOUR COUNT JOHN A. JACOBSEN, RE. CONSULTING ENGINEER ( 1500 1400 1300 1200 I100 I000 900 8OO ?00 6OO 5OO 4OO 300 200 O0 ..... ~-o 8o°o0o0000 ooooooooooo-~ o° ooooooooo oooooooooo°~ HOURLY VARIATION OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES COUNTS TAKEN ~AT., //,,.&"r' '~0~ 24 HOUR COUNT JOHN A. JACOBSEN, RE. CONSULTING ENGINEER ( 1500 1400 BOO 1200 II00 1000 900 8O0 '70O 600 5OO 4OO 3OO 200 100 00 ~.Oo o o o o o o o o o oz° ~ ~ ~ o o o o o o o o z HOURLY VARIATION OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES COUNTS TAKEN 24 HOUR COUNT ~.AST ~lJ ~ E~ 9ou¢,'E.; N,T, 5. De. PT. JOHN A. JACOBSEN, RE. CONSULTING ENGINEER ¢ 1500 1400 1300 1200 I100 1000 9OO 8OO 7OO 6OO 5OO 4OO 3O0 2OO I00 O0 HOURLY VARIATION OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES COUNTS TAKEN 24 HOUR COUNT JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER ( 1500 1400 1300 1200 I100 I000 90O 80O 70O 6O0 500 4O0 3O0 20O ~00 O0 ooo o oo o o o o oz HOURLY VARIATION OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES COUNTS TAKEN STit~.L i M~ ::)4 HOUR COUNT OF Tia, A~ p'4 ~T,~.T' i o M JOHN A. JACOBSEN, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER ( 1500 1400 1300 1200 I100 1000 9OO 8OO 700 600 5OO 4OO 300 2OO I00 O0 HOURLY VARIATION OF TRAFFIC VOLUMES COUNTS TAKEN \~1~'~,1 JUNg. ~ 24 HOUR COUNT JOHN A. JACOBSEN, RE. CONSULTING ENGINEER -3- For the purposes of this study, we will use the graph for Saturday, May 30, 1970 which should result in a conservative analysis of the effect of the proposed development and also account for any additional summer traffic which may be attracted to this area. In addition, we will use the largest ^.M. peak hour and the largest P.M. peak hour indicated on the chart. The A.M. peak hour occurs between ll:00 A.M. and 12:00 Noon with an eastbound volume of 3~0 vehicles per hour and a westbound count of 220 vehicles per hour for a total two-way count of 560 vehicles per hour. The P.M. ~wo-way peak occurred between 3:00 P.M. and 4:00 P.M, where 340 vehicles were counted in a westbound direction and 290 vehicles in an eastbound direction for a total of 630 vehicles for both directions. TRAFFIC ~ENERATION To determine the effects of the traffic generated by the proposed facility on the street system adjacent to the site, it ks essential to study the projects trip Meneration characteristics. The basic traffic engineerinK terms used in this report ape trip and generation. Both terms cause some confusion due to their use in other studies. The term trip in this study refers to a single vehicular movement (one way) having either an origin or a destination within the study area or site. The term generation refers to the total number of trips within a given time period having an origin or destination within the study area or site. The March 1970 issue of "Traffic Engineering" carried an article entitled "Trip Generation Study of Selected Commercial and Residential DevelopmenTs" By the Illinois section of the Institute of Traffic Engineers. The result of this study indicated peak period generation factors for v~w£ous comme~cial and residential pro~ects as follows: USE ..... TRIPS' PER iN "bUT IN ----~ Sing, Fam. Res. Dwelling 0.23 0.58 0.60 0.#0 Town Houses . Unit 0.08 0.49 0.46 0.23 Office 1000 s.f. g.$~ 0.00 0.00 2.3 Neigh. Shop. C~r. 1000 s.f. 1.0 1.0 ?.0 ?.0 The above generation factors were applied To The various facilities of proposed pro~ecT in question. The results of which ~re indicated in Table ~l and ~2. IT is important To note that we hav~ added The peak number of trips for each use under the assumption that They occurred within the same ho~r. This is probably not the case, however if the worst si~uation does not create any adverse Traffic conditions, the project should be acceptable ~rom a Traffic standpoint. HXCHW^Y CAPACIT~ 2TUDY From physical measuPe~ents of the width of a highway, percentage of t~ucks, peak hour factor and other criteria, the roadway capacity can he computed. Capacity basically is the ability of a roadway to handle Traffic. The results of these compuTaTions indicated that under existing roadway conditions, The capacity of Nain Road is about 1~80 vehicles per TABLE A.~o ?EAK HOUR - TI~P "Lq" "IN" "OUT" "OUT" USE. QUANTITY (FACTOR) (NO. TRI~S) (FACTOR) (NOo TRIPS) SfnE. Fan. Res. 100 D.U. 0.23 ~'%~tps/P.U. 23 0.58 trfps/P.U. 58 Townhouses 385 D.U. 0.08 trips/D.U. 31 0.~9 t~*ips/P.U. 189 9ffice 5,000 sg. ft. 2.1 t~ips/i,000 sq. ft. 12 ..... ~elEho Shop. C~-~. 10,000 sq. ft. 1.0 t~ips/1,O00 sq. ft. 10 1.0 tz, ip$/1,000 sq. ft. i0 Total ~o. -IN" - 75 Total ~o. "OU~' - 257 P.N. PEAK HOUR - TN~P GENERAT,ION "I~" "INn "OU~' "O~T" USE QUP~qTITY (FACTOR) .. (NO. T~PS) (FAVOR) (NO. T~PS) S~g. F~. ~. 100 D.U. 0,60 ~ips/D.U. 60 0.~0 ~ips/D.U. q0 To~o~es 365 D.U. 0.~6 ~ps/D.U. 177 0.23 ~ips/D.U. ~fl~ 5,000 sq. ft. - .... 2.3 ~ips/1,O00 sq. ~l~. a~. C~. 10,000'sq. ft. 7.0 ~i~/1,O00 sq. f~. ' 70 7.0 ~tps/1,000 sq. ft. 70 T~ ~. "~" - 307 Tot~ ~our for both d£rectiona. This means ~hat if traffic is split with 50% eastbound and 50% westbound, 740 vehicles can be acco~ncdated in each direction or, in the extreme, 1~80 vehicles per hour can pass a given point in one direction if there in no opposing Traffic. The A.M. peak hour total Traffic generation amoun~to 333 vehicles per hour. This fl~re combined with the present two way ^.M. peak hour volume of 560 vehicles per hour, equals 893 vehicles per hour. The volume per capacity ratio therefore, equals 893/1480 or 60.3%. The P.M. peak hour, two way traffic generation, amounts to 518 vehicles per hour which when combined with the existing two way peak P.M. traffic volume of 630 vehicles per hour equals 1148 vehicles per hour. When this total anticipated t"raffic volume is compared with the roads capacity (volume/cal~acity ratio, 1~148/1480) the road during this peak period would approach 77.6% of its physical ability to handle Traffic. The above analysis assumes that all vehicles enteming or leaving the multl-fam~ly ames and those enterin~ or leaving The single family, office building and shopptn~ a~ea all originate: or are destined for points either 9mat or west of the subject property. To -{llusT~ate, if all vehicles originated o~ were dest~ll~ for G~ee~port, the Total P.M. ~wo way traffic volume im~ediately west of the subject property would amount to 11~8 vehicles per hour, however- if some vehicles qame or were destined for O~£ent PoLnt f~om the subject property, the 11~8 vehicles would be reduced by that amount. It is therefore obvious that The 1~8 vehicles per hour fisure, is the maximum number of vehicles that could be anticipated. The actual volume would be something less and accordingly the volume/capacity ratio would be less than 77.6%. With all factors considered, including the assumption that all anticipated peak hou~ tr.~.ps occulted with the sam~ hour, ~he A.M. ~ volu~/capacl~ ~atio a~ 60.3% ~d P.M. ~ of 77.6% do no~ cons~i~u~e ~af~lc ~YSIS OF ~ TU~ OPPOR~ITIES ~ ~he pas~ thee (3) yea~, ~hls offi~ has p~pa~d nu~e~ous ~aff~c s~-%%ys which have ~ncluded the s~udy of left ~ move~nts ~d ou~ of pro~sed ~d existln~ fac[~t~es. We ha~ ~cently c~led ~he ~sul~s of ~hese su~eys ~d have p~p~d ~o (2) sT~ai~h~ line wh[~ app~%e ~he me~ of all ~he data plotted. ~ese ~aphs have been included h this s~dy ~ E~[b[~ ~7 ~d Exh~b~ ~8. Ut~l[zin~ the ~ove ~nT~oned e~[~s ~d ~ow[ng the pe~ hou~ ~raffic volu~s fora ~n R~d, ~he n~em of lef~ ~ oppor~it~es dur[n~ the pe~ f~ve (5[ ~utes of ~he pe~ ho~ ~ be app--[mated. E~[T ~7 indicates in a d~am~ ta ~o-l~e~ ~w~way Doad w[~h a ~hlcle c~ssing opposins t~f[c ~o enter a curb cu~ or d~fwway. nu~er one h ~he d~a~am, ~ndica~es ~he potentl~ ~nt of vehlc~ c~fl[c~. ~deD These conditions, a mo~or~s~ will no~ a~te~pT this m~euveD ~til a gap or space between vehicles la ~he op~ns ~raff~c [s ~h~ ~.75 sec~ds which is ro~ded out to 5.0 sec~ fo~ the 9~e of ~h[s s~dy. In Condit~n I, only ~he wesTbo~d peak h~ ~maff[c ~lu~ of 3~O vehicles pep houm is s~[f[~t. ~e pe~ f[~ (5) m~nute t~aff~c vol~ c~ be computed by mult~plyln~ ~he ~ak hour ~afflc vol~e by a fac~op of 1~% oP (3~0 x .11) 37 ~hicles. ~s ~1% facToP was ~h~ough ~alysis of n~us s~d~es we have prepaid ovem ~he past years. F~nd[ng ~he f[~ of 37 vehicles on ~he vertical colu~ of E~[b[t ~7 ~d p~ceedin~ ~o ~he ri~ht to ~he solid line, then do~ ~o ~he ~0 t~O lbo qo ,fy A I l-' z ul I&O ~$o Iio o Io 20* ~,o 4.0 h'orizontal line, we find that approximately ~B lef~ turn opportunities are possible during this peak f~:~m~hute' period. Assuming ~hat th6 enTir~ hour would provide only ~8 left turn oppo~n:unlties every five minutes, (Note: Each of the re~)aining eleven five minute periods would permit more than #8 left turn oppol~nmities) this wou~d mean(~8 x 12) or 576 left turns per h~u~ would be possible during the heaviest t~fic volumes. The maximum number of vehicles that would possibly be ~aking this movement ~s th~ 177 vehicles from the. Townhou~e un,tS during the P.M. peak hour. This ·leo assumes ~h·t every vehicle orisinates frnm a point west of the entrance to the Townhouse complex and that they make a left turn movement into the cc~plex. These 177 motorists' would have no difficulty n~king a left turn since greater than 576 ~portumitdes would be available. Exhibit ~8 shows in a diagram, a ~wo-lane, ~wo-way ~oad wt~h a vehicle leaving a d~lveway or cur~ cut, c~ossing · lane of traffic (couflict point indicated with a number one) and merging with the opposing lane of ~raffic (conflict point Indicated with a number ~wo). The right angle crossing and merging maneuver requ/~es a to~al gap time of 6.0 seconds before a mot~ist will attempt this maneuver. In this condition, the total ~o-way traffic volume for Hain Road during the peak hour would be the si~nificant figure. This peak hour occur~ between 3:00 P.N. and #:00 P.Ho, when 630 vehicles were recorded for the east and westbound directions. By multiplying 630 vehicles per hour by the ~% factor, the peak five (5) minutes ~raffic volum~ would be appl~oximately 69 vehicles, We then find 69 vehicles in the radical column of Exhibit #8. which is read in the same manner as Exhibit #7, and we find that approx~ately 29 left turn opportunities a~e possible during ~his peak five minute interval. Assuming as we did for Condition I that the entire hour would provide only 29 left turn opportunities every five minutes, this would mean (29 x 12) or ~8 left turns per hour would he possible during the heaviest traffic volumes. Again the largest exiting traffic volume is fro~ the Townhouse complex where 189 vehicles leave the site during the A.~. peak hour. Using the improbable assumption that all 189 vehicles performed a left turn toward Orient Point, they would have no difficulty since greater than 3~8 opport~mities would be available. It should he noted that all other movements into and out of either the Townhouse complex or the single family, office and shopping:aL'es entrance would he right turns which are' much less critical than the left movements described. CONCLUSION Based on the various elements of this traffic analysis, it is my opinion that the construction of the improvements indicated herein, will not create an undue traffic hazard or traffic congestion. JAJ/ht I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK -9- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROADWAY DESCRIPTIONS The major highway facility that provides access to the proposed development is New York State Route 25. New York State Route 25 is essentially an east/west route that consists of an undivided highway with one travel lane in each direction and no separate turning lanes. New York State Route 25 is the only highway facility in close proximity to the site that will be impacted by site-generated traffic. It should be noted that County Road 48 ends on the west side of the intersection of Main Street (south leg of Route 25) at Route 25, North Road (on the east). The lane configurations at the intersection approaches of Route 25 at the pro- posed access road to the site consist of the following: I. Eastbound Approach on Route 25: One thru lane. 2. Westbound Approach on Route 25: One thru lane. MAJOR INTERSECTIONS There are no major intersections that are located in the vicinity of the site that this project will have a traffic impact on. GRADES AND SIGHT DISTANCES The grades on Route 25 in the vicinity of the site are essentially flat. Thus, excellent sight distance will be available for traffic exiting the site. -10- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ACCIDENT RECORDS An accident history on New York State Route 25 in the vicinity of the site was obtained for the period 1982 through 1985 from the New York State Department of Transportation. Their records indicate that there were no accidents along this stretch of Route 25 easterly to the Orient Point Ferry. As a result, there are no high frequency accident locations within the vicinity of the site. This low rate of accident occurence reflects the fact that there are few adverse driving conditions on New York Sate Route 25 in the vicinity of the site. -11- I ! I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW CONDITIONS I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I TRAFFIC VOL~SMES Available traffic flow information was obtained from the New York State De- partment of Transportation. The available information consisted of machine traffic counts for a coverage count station on Route 25 in the vicinity of the site that contains hourly volumes. According to the information obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation, the average daily traffic volumes on the roadways in the vicinity of the proposed site are listed below: - On Route 25, the average daily traffic is 4,300 vehicles. An examination of the traffic volume information reveals that the peak weekday traffic volumes occur between the hours of 5:00 to 6:00 PM., while the peak Saturday traffic volumes occur between the hours of 11:00 A.M. to 12:00 Noon. The available traffic volume information is contained in the section of the Appendix entitled "Traffic Volume Counts". AVAILABLE GAPS Since the proposed development is accessible from both the eastbound and west- bound lanes on Route 25, opportunities for safe ingress and egress at the site were examined on the basis of (1) opportunities available to make left turns in and right turns out of the site, and (2) opportunities to make left turns out of the site. It was determined that there are sufficient gaps for safe ingress from the east and safe ingress and egress to the west under varying traffic conditions for the majority of the year. Adequate gaps are available in the westbound and eastbound flows of traffic due to the predominantly free flow operation of Route 25 in this area. -13- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A critical gap study was conducted that examined the simultaneous gaps in both directions of travel on Route 25. Table 1 reflects the results of this study, which is based upon the new Highway Capacity Manual, "Transportation Research Board Special Report 209, 1985". Each of the numbers under the column "Poten- tial Capacity" reflects the number of vehicles that are expected to make the respective movement in an hour under these conditions. These volumes will be discussed in another section of this report entitled "Roadway Capacity An- alysis''. -14- I I I I CRITICAL OPPOSING POTENTIAL MOVEMENT GAP REQUIRED VOLUME CAPACITY Southbound to Eastbound 8.0 Seconds 430 Veh./Hr. 390 Veh./Hr. Left Turn Out of Site Southbound to Westbound 6.5 Seconds 173 Veh./Hr. 750 Veh./Hr. Right Turn Out of Site Eastbound Left Turn 5.5 Seconds 173 Veh./Hr. 910 Veh./Hr. Into the Site I I I ! I I I I I I I I I TABLE 1 CRITICAL GAP CAPACITY ANALYSIS -15- EXISTING EMERGENCY SERVICES The availability of police protection and fire protection services in the vicinity of the proposed site is excellent. The Southold Town Police De- partment covers the area of the site. The closest firehouse of the Village of Greenport Fire Department is located within the Village, less than one mile from the site. Due to the excellent patrol coverage of the police and the close proximity of the firehouse, it should be recognized that excellent emergency services are available to service the site of The Breakers at Lands End. -17- SITE TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS -18- I I I I I I I Information on trip generation rates for condominium housing complexes are contained in the latest printing of the "ITE Trip Generation Manual" that is published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The information con- tained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual is consistent with generation rates of similar developments in Suffolk County. Table 2, Site Generated Traffic, presents a breakdown of the anticipated entering and exiting traffic for the proposed development of The Breakers at Lands End for the peak hours on a weekday and on a Saturday. 350 CONDOMINIUM HOUSING UNITS Average Trip Ends Per Hour Average Trip Ends Per Hour Average Peak Hour Trip Ends A.M. Peak Hours (7-9 A.M.) P.M. Peak Hours (4-6 P.M.) Saturday A.M. (il-Noon) Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit 25 130 130 63 91 77 I I I I I I I I Table 2 Site Generated Traffic -19- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The directional distribution was estimated based on the anticipated location of work, shopping, and recreational destinations. It should be noted that due to the location of the site at the eastern end of the North Fork of Long Island, minor traffic volumes are expected from east of the site. Figure 4, Directional Distribution of Site Generated Traffic, indicates the percentage of the vehicles that will arrive at and exit from the proposed de- velopment via the existing roadways based on the provision of an access point on Route 25. -21- I I o~,~ . , I I'1'~ ISLAND'S END I /'/ · SI/r- GOLF AND COUNTRY CLU I I I  FIGURE 4 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC I NOT TO SCALE 22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS -23- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I The site-generated traffic and the directional distribution were utilized to assign traffic volumes at the proposed access point and on the surrounding roadway network. Figure 5, Distribution of Site Generated Traffic, assigns the site-generated traffic during the peak weekday hour of 8:00 to 9:00 A.M., the peak weekday evening hour of 5:00 to 6:00 P.M., and the peak Saturday hour of 11:00 A.M. to 12:00 Noon. -24- I I I I I I I SiTE~ ,SLA.~,'s GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB' I I I I I I I ~....~.~ - ~e~ -- ~:oo-~:oo A.M. ~0 .~ (000) = 5:00-6:00 P.M. ~,~ c000] = I 1:00 A.M.-NOON (SATURDAY) FIGURE 5 SITE-GENERAT'ED TRAFFIC VOLUMES NOT TO SCALE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS -26- I I I I I In order to assess the impact of the site-generated traffic on the adjacent roadway network, the traffic was compared to the previously conducted criti- cal gap analysis. Table 3 reflects this comparison. POTENTIAL ANTICIPATED PEAK HOUR VOLUMES * MOVEMENT CAPACITY** 8-9 AM 4-5 PM SAT. 11-12 AM Southbound to Eastbound 390 VPH 13 6 8 Left Turn Out of Site Southbound to Westbound 750 VPH 117 57 69 Right Turn Out of Site Eastbound Left Turn 910 VPH 23 117 82 Lane Into Site I I I I I I I I I I I I I * From Figure 5 ** From Table Table 3 Site Traffic Versus Critical Gap Volumes It is obvious from this analysis that the volumes which are expected to be generated by this development will be easily accommodated and will only minim- ally impact the surrounding highway network. -27- I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I ACCESS EXAMINATION -28- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I In order to develop an access plan which will cause minimal interference to the flow of traffic on Route 25, the major access point to the site was de- signed to permit right turns in, right turns out, left turns in, and left turns out. The access plan indicated on the site plan provides a separate entrance roadway and a separate exit roadway, with the easterly driveway being the entrance roadway and the westerly driveway being the exit roadway. Even if one major access roadway is provided, it is recommended that in order to minimize future congestion and delays on the exit roadway from The Breakers at Lands End, a separate right turn exit lane and a separate left turn exit lane should be provided. It is recommended that an eastbound to northbound left turn lane be provided on Route 25 to accommodate left turning vehicles that desire to enter this site. This separate left turn lane will enhance the flow of traffic along Route 25 by minimizing disruptions and stops and delays to thru traffic that could otherwise be delayed by waiting behind the left turning traffic. A 20 foot wide emergency access road is also located along the westerly pro- perty line. Access will be permitted only to emergency vehicles. -29- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I Our study and analysis have concluded that the construction of the proposed development will have minimal traffic impact on Route 25 and the adjacent roadways in the immediate area of the proposed development. Although the development of the condominium homes will add traffic to the adjacent roadway network, the traffic impact will be minimal and the existing highway network will be able to easily accommodate this additional traffic. The following points should be recognized: The location and design of the access point on Route 25 will provide the traffic service required with minimal disruption to traffic on Route 25. It is recommended that an eastbound to northbound left turn storage lane be provided on Route 25 to accommodate left turning vehicles desiring to enter the site. Due to the excellent patrol coverage of the police department and the close proximity of the fire house, it should be recognized that excellent emergency services are available to service the site of The Breakers at Lands End. There are sufficient available gaps on Route 25 to accommodate the safe ingress and egress of vehicles that will be generated by the proposed de- velopment. As a result, there is sufficient capacity on Route 25 to ac- commodate this additional site-generated traffic without creating a traf- fic operational problem. 5J The vehicular entrance/exit to the site is clearly visible to traffic on Route 25. Thus, the sight distance in the vicinity of this point is adequate. No nearby adjacent driveways exist on Route 25 that will in- terfere with the operation of the access driveway. As a result, based on a traffic and safety standpoint, it is recommended that the proposed development of The Breakers at Lands End be approved. -31- I t I I ,11~" I ~ I I I I I 3/04/85 DC 07 STATION 296 YR 84 MD dUNE ROUTE 25 MILEP0[NT 0417251 LOCAT[0N MANHASSET AVE NARROW RIVER RD WK-Y8 27 FACTOR GROUP 60 CATCH NO. 457 REFERENCE MARKER POST 25 07041702 12 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 C 9 IO 11 TD TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO TO DY D D I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO 11 12 I 2 3 4 5 C ? 8 9 10 11 12 ROUTE 25 PAGE 3 TYPE 4 C SECTION LENGTH 5.34 DI~ DAY HI HI HR TOTAL TOTAL HR COUNT 26 2 1 2 1 O I O 2 7 28 19 15 17 22 18 14 16 14 17 14 10 7 7 6 4 4 2450 8 280 26 2 2 2 O I O O 1 6 IO 12 10 15 13 14 18 16 14 26 12 10 7 11 5 3 1 2070 4520 17 260 27 3 I 1 I O I O 1 6 20 12 11 14 I5 17 17 I8 15 16 15 11 7 6 6 5 5 2200 8 200 27 3 2 2 1 O O 0 2 5 8 13 10 15 12 16 17 19 15 31 13 12 9 11 5 4 1 2210 4410 17 310 28 4 1 2 1 1 O O 3 5 20 14 11 14 15 17 14 17 15 17 16 1t 8 9 7 5 3 2250 8 200 28 4 2 2 O 1 O I I 5 10 13 14 14 11 21 14 20 14 30 12 13 10 13 5 5 I 2300 4550 17 300 DIR 1 2 3 AVERAGE WEEKDAY HOUR 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 TOTAL 4 2 2 1 1 3 11 32 27 24 29 30 34 31 35 29 45 29 24 DIR TOTAL COUNT FACTORED ADV HRS COUNTED DAYS COUNTED AVG % AVG DAY HI HR I 8910 2i98 94 5 220 .O94 2 8440 2104 94 5 280 .125 TOTAL 17350 4302 188 10 450 .O98 8 8 T 5 9 12 S 4 17 20 12 9 EST DESIGN HOUR 507 DIR DAY HI HIDAY 12 TOTAL TOTAL HR HOUR 4 2330 220 1 2230 280 5 4560 460 EST AADT 4302 HR TRAFFIC FOR THE AT LANDS IMPACT STUDY BREAKERS END TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NEW YORK PREPARED FOR WOLOWITZ ORGANIZATION BY DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES MARCH 1988 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic INTRODUCTION · · · Purpose of Report Location · · Area Map . . Location Map Site Map · · STUDY APPROACH .......... EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK ...... Roadway Descriptions ...... Major Intersections ..... Grades and Sight Distances · · EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW CONDITIONS . . Traffic Volumes ....... Accident Records ..... EXISTING EMERGENCY SERVICES SITE TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS ACCESS EXAMINATION . · · ROADWAY MODIFICATIONS . · CONCLUSIONS .... APPENDIX ....... Capacity Analyses Traffic Volume Counts Page 1 2 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 10 11 12 13 14 16 18 21 24 27 31 33 35 38 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PURPOSE OF REPORT This Traffic Impact Study contains the results of a traffic engineering ex- amination of the proposed development of The Breakers at Lands End. This re- port has been prepared to assess the impact of the proposed development of 350 condominium housing units and a two phase retail development with 13,910 square feet in the first stage and 6,600 square feet in the second stage for a total of 20,510 square feet. This report appraises the traffic aspects of the proposed development with particular emphasis on its impact on the surrounding street and highway network. LOCATION The Breakers at Lands End will be located on the north side of New York State Route 25, approximately 1,140 feet east of Sound Road in Greenport, within the Town of Southold in Suffolk County, New York. Figure 1, Area Map, indicates the location of the Town of Southold in the New York Metropolitan area. The project site is shown in Figure 2, Location Map, while Figure 3, Site Map, presents the boundaries of the property and the adjacent roadway network. At present, the property is undeveloped. -2- Rh.,HMOND WESTCHESTER BRONX QUEENS KINGS / CONN. NASSAU UND SUFFOLK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -- GREENPORT~ FIGURE I AREA MAP DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. SCALE: DATE: PAGE. 1'= 7.4mi MAY 1986 3 I ' LANDS END~i~ ~"~°~ ~ I cov~ ~ / I I I FIGURE 2 LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE 4 I FIGURE 3 SITE MAP I NOT TO SCALE 5 I I I I I i i I I I I I I I I I I I I As part of the preparation of this Traffic Impact Study, the following tasks were undertaken: Several personal, on-site field observations were made to observe the traffic movements under various conditions. 2. A physical inventory was made of the adjacent street network. An analysis was made of the traffic volume data obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation and the Suffolk County Department of Public Works. An examination was made of the traffic flow on State Route 25. Also, the available capacity of the surrounding street network was determined. An evaluation was made of the safety factors by reviewing sight dis- tances and available safe gaps in the traffic flow. 6. The availability of police and fire protection services was examined. A trip generation analysis was performed to determine the additional traffic attributable to the proposed development of The Breakers at Lands End. A directional distribution analysis was made to distribute the site- generated traffic onto the surrounding street network. A trip assignment analysis was performed to examine the composite traf- fic volumes, that would result due to the addition of the site-generated traffic to the existing traffic volumes, in order to determine the traf- fic impacts on the surrounding roadways. 10. A review of the access arrangements was made- -7- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! 11. Discussions were held with representatives of the New York State Depart- ment of Transportation and the Town of Southold to review the traffic aspects of this project. 12. Conclusions were made of the traffic impact of the development as a re- suit of the data and facts gathered in this study. -8- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK -9- I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I i I I ROADWAY DESCRIPTIONS The major highway facility that provides access to the proposed development is New York State Route 25. New York State Route 25 is essentially an east/west route that consists of an undivided highway with one travel lane in each direction and no separate turning lanes. New York State Route 25 is the only highway facility in close proximity to the site that will be impacted by site-generated traffic. It should be noted that County Road 48 ends on the west side of the intersection of Main Street (south leg of Route 25) at Route 25, North Road (on the east). The lane configurations at the intersection approaches of Route 25 at the pro- posed access roads to the site consist of the following: 1. Eastbound Approach on Route 25: One thru lane. 2. Westbound Approach on Route 25: One thru lane. MAJOR INTERSECTIONS There is one major intersection located in the vicinity of the site on which this project will have a traffic impact. This is the intersection is Route 25/County Road 48 at Main Street which is currently controlled by a flashing signal. The lane configurations at the intersection approaches of Route 25/County Road 48 at Main Street consist of the following: 1. Eastbound Approach on County Road 48: One thru lane and a separate right turn lane. -10- I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I 2. Westbound Approach on Route 25: A separate left turn lane and a thru lane. Northbound Approach on Main Street: A separate left turn lane and a separate right turn lane. GRADES AND SIGHT DISTANCES The grades on Route 25 in the vicinity of the site are essentially flat and no horizontal curves exist that would limit sight distance. Thus, excellent sight distance will be available for traffic exiting the site. -11- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW CONDITIONS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TRAFFIC VOLUMES Available traffic flow information was obtained from the New York State De- partment of Transportation. The available information consisted of machine traffic counts for a coverage count station on Route 25 in the vicinity of the site that contains hourly volumes. According to the information obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation, the average daily traffic volumes on the roadways in the vicinity of the proposed site are listed below: - On Route 25, the average daily traffic is 4,300 vehicles. An examination of the traffic volume information reveals that the peak weekday traffic volumes occur between the hours of 5:00 to 6:00 PM., while the peak Saturday traffic volumes occur between the hours of 11:00 A.M. to 12:00 Noon. Intersection turning movement counts for the intersection of Route 25/County Road 48 at Main Street were also obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation. These counts were taken in September and October of 1987. In order to project these counts to simulate a summer condition, counts from a permanent count station on County Road 48 were obtained from the Suffolk County Department of Transportation for August and September of 1986. In addition, volume data from the Orient Point Cross Sound Ferry was obtained to analyze the effects increased ferry services may have had. As a result of this analyses the September data was increased by 22% to simulate August data and to simulate Saturday traffic conditions this data was increased by 14%. The available traffic volume information is contained in the section of the Appendix entitled "Traffic Volume Counts". -13- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ACCIDENT RECORDS An accident history on New York State Route 25 in the vicinity of the site was obtained for the period 1983 through 1986 from the New York State Department of Transportation. This accident history is presented in Table 1. There are no "high accident" locations within the vicinity of the site and the current accident rate is considered low for a State highway facility. This low rate of accident occurence reflects the fact that there are few adverse driving conditions on New York State Route 25 in the vicinity of the site. -14- I I I TOTAL ACCIDENTS 1984 1985 1986 Route 25/County Road 48 at Main Street i 2 2 Route 25 from Main Street to Bay 9 5 2 Avenue (1.7. miles) Route 25 at Bay Avenue 0 0 3 I I I I I I I I I i I I I I TABLE 1 ACCIDENT HISTORY -15- EXISTING EMERGENCY SERVICES -16- I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The availability of police protection and fire protection services in the vicinity of the proposed site is excellent. The Southold Town Police De- partment covers the area of the site. The closest firehouse of the Village of Greenport Fire Department is located within the Village, less than one mile from the site. Due to the excellent patrol coverage of the police and the close proximity of the firehouse, it should be recognized that excellent emergency services are available to service the site of The Breakers at Lands End. -17- I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I SITE TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I i I I Information on trip generation rates for a) condominium housing complexes and b) retail shopping contained in the latest printing of the "ITE Trip Generation Manual" that is published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The information contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual is consistent with generation rates of similar developments in Suffolk County. Table 1, Site Generated Traffic, presents a breakdown of the anticipated entering and exiting traffic for the proposed development of The Breakers at Lands End for the peak hours on a weekday and on a Saturday. -19- Average Trip Ends Per Hour Average Trip Ends Per Hour Average Peak Hour Trip Ends A.M. Peak Hours (7-9 A.M.) P.M. Peak Hours (4-6 P.M.) Saturday A.M. (il-Noon) Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit 350 Condominium 25 130 130 63 91 77 Housing Units Shopping Center 37 16 128 133 138 133 Phase I (13,910 S.F.) 100 Seat Restaurant 4 0 7 3 15 10 Shopping Center 51 20 158 160 191 179 Phase I & II (20,510 S.F.) TOTAL 76 150 288 223 282 256 (Condominiums and Shopping Center Phases I & II) TABLE 2 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -21- -DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The directional distribution was estimated based on the anticipated location of work, shopping, and recreational destinations. It should be noted that due to the location of the site at the eastern end of the North Fork of Long Island, minor traffic volumes are expected from east of the site. Figure 4, Directional Distribution of Site Generated Traffic, indicates the percentage of the vehicles that will arrive at and exit from the proposed de- velopment via the existing roadways based on the provision of access points on Route 25. -22- ! ! ,, SITE \\ PO~R0 I POSED I ~ CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT \\ ! ..--~ , I ! ISLAND'S END GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB' ! ! FIGURE 4 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC NOT TO SCALE 23 I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I -24- TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I -24- TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The site-generated traffic and assign traffic volumes at the roadway network. the directional distribution were utilized to proposed access point and on the surrounding Figure 5, Distribution of Site Generated Traffic, assigns the site-generated traffic during the peak weekday hour of 8:00 to 9:00 A.M., the peak weekday evening hour of 5:00 to 6:00 P.M., and the peak Saturday hour of 11:00 A.M. to 12:00 Noon. -25- PO POSED COUNTRY CLUB' CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT = 8:00-9:00 A.M. (SATURDAY) FIGURE 5 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES I NOT TO SCALE I 26 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROADWAY CAPACITY ANALYSIS -27- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Unsignalized capacity analyses for the intersection of Route 25/County Road 48 at Main Street were performed using the new Highway Capacity Manual, "Transportation Research Board Special Report 209, 1985". First, intersection capacity analyses were performed for the future 1989 traffic conditions without the proposed development (the "No-Build Alternative") during the peak hours of the weekday and Saturday afternoon. This capacity analysis revealed that northbound left turning traffic from Main Street was encountering delays and this approach operated at level of service E. Then, the intersection capacity analyses were performed for these same time periods with the addition of the site-generated traffic from the fully developed Breakers at Lands End. A comparison of these conditions reveals that the level of service deteriorated as a result of the addition of the site-generated traffic. A signalized intersection analysis was then conducted at the intersection of Route 25/County Road 48 at Main Street to determine the potential benefits of signalization of this intersection. This analyses shows that if signalized this intersection would operate at excellent levels of service under both the "Build" and "No-Build" condition. It is therefore recommended that this intersection be signalized. A summary of these analyses is contained in the Appendix in the section entitled "Capacity Analyses". It is obvious from both of these analyses that the site-generated traffic will be easily accommodated with the implementation of the recommended roadway modifications and will have only a minimal impact on the surrounding highway network. As a result, the development of the proposed Breakers at Lands End will have no adverse traffic impact on the surrounding roadway network. Gap analyses were performed in accordance with the methodology set forth in the new Highway Capacity Manual at the intersection of both the easterly access driveway to the proposed condominium development and westerly access -28- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I driveway to the proposed shopping center from Route 25 to assess the ability of site-generated traffic to enter and exit the site safely. A summary of the results of the critical gap analyses are contained in Table 2. These critical gap analyses indicate that the future capacity of these driveways will more than accommodate the anticipated traffic that will enter and exit the proposed driveways. -29- (]{ITICAL ANTICIPATED I~L[~ BDTENTIAL CAPACITY CaP (VEHICLES/HOLR) (VEHICLES/HOtR) * (s~o~) WEEKDAY WEEKDAY A.M. P.M. SATURDAY A.M. P.M. SATURDAY LCCATION/bDVt~ENT PEAK HOIR PEAK HOLR PEAK H0tR FEAK HOIR PEAK HOLR ~ HOtR (8-9 A.M.) (5-6 P.M.) (12-1 P.M.) (8-9 A.M.) (5-6 P.M.) (12-1 P.M.) Route 25 @ The Westerly Site Access Driveway -Southbound to Eastbound 7.10 2 10 19 240 91 110 Left T~rn Frcra Driveway -Southbound to Wes tbound 5.90 21 161 174 532 450 54 7 Right Turn From Driveway -Eastbound to Northbctmd 5.20 50 167 189 689 591 701 Laft Ttrn Into Driveway Route 25 @ The Easterly Site Access Driveway -Sc~thbound to Eastbound 7,10 15 7 9 328 125 167 Left Turn Frcm Driveway -Southbound to Westbound 5.90 134 65 79 620 478 511 Pdght T~rn Fram Driveway -Eastbound to Nortl~ound 5.20 21 140 98 794 623 658 Left Turn Into Driveway * Volumms are in Passenger Car Equivalent. TABLE 3 CRITICAL C~%P ANALYSIS COMPOSITE 1989 ~MAFFIC I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ACCESS EXAMINATION -3 l- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! The proposed development will be provided with two separate access points, one for the proposed condominium development and one for the proposed shopping center development. In order to develop an access plan which will cause minimal interference to the flow of traffic on Route 25, both access points to the site were de- signed to permit right turns in, right turns out, left turns in, and left toms out. The access plan indicated on the site plan provides a separate entrance roadway and a separate exit roadway for the condominium site with the easterly roadway being the entrance and the westerly roadway being the exit. It is recommended that in order to minimize future congestion and delays on the exit roadway from The Breakers at Lands End, a separate right turn exit lane and a separate left turn exit lane should be provided. The access plan for the shopping center development will provide one ingress lane, a separate right turn exit lane, and a separate left turn exit lane. The ingress lane and the egress lanes will be separated by a median. It is recommended that an eastbound to northbound left turn lane be provided on Route 25 to accommodate left turning vehicles that desire to enter both access points to this site. These separate left turn lanes will enhance the flow of traffic along Route 25 by minimizing disruptions and stops and delays to thru traffic that could otherwise be delayed by waiting behind the left turning traffic. In addition to the two major access points, a 20 foot wide emergency access road is also located along the westerly property line. Access will be permitted only to emergency vehicles. -32- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -33- ROADWAY MODIFICATIONS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I It is recommended that eastbound to northbound left turn lanes on Route 25 be provided at both the entrance to the proposed shopping center and to the proposed condominium development. In order to provide these left turn lanes it will be necessary to widen and restripe with pavement markings the existing roadway. In addition, it is recommended that the existing flashing traffic signal at the intersection of Route 25/County Road 48 at Main Street be converted to a three color semi-actuated traffic signal. This signal should also be provided with a left turn arrow for westbound traffic turning south into Main Street. -34- I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I Our study and analysis have concluded that the construction of the proposed development will have minimal traffic impact on Route 25 and the adjacent roadways in the immediate area of the proposed development. Although the development of the condominium homes and shopping center will add traffic to the adjacent roadway network, the traffic impact will be minimal and the existing highway network will be able to easily accommodate this additional traffic with the implementation of the recommended roadway modifications. The following points should be recognized: The location and design of the access points on Route 25 will provide the traffic service required with minimal disruption to traffic on Route 25. It is recommended that eastbound to northbound left turn storage lanes be provided on Route 25 at both major access points to accommodate left turning vehicles desiring to enter the site. Due to the excellent patrol coverage of the police department and the close proximity of the fire house, it should be recognized that excellent emergency services are available to service the site of The Breakers at Lands End. There are sufficient available gaps on Route 25 to accommodate the safe ingress and egress of vehicles that will be generated by the proposed de- velopment. As a result, there is sufficient capacity on Route 25 to ac- commodate this additional site-generated traffic without creating a traf- fic operational problem. The intersection capacity analysis performed at the intersection of Route 25/County Road 48 at Main Street revealed that in 1989, on the northbound Main Street approach, left turning traffic will experience some delays resulting in a level of service of E on that approach. With the addition of site-generated traffic this level of service will deteriorate to level of service F and the northbound right turning traffic will also -36- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I experience difficulties. It is therefore recommended that the existing flashing signal operation be converted to a three color semi-actuated signal with a left turn arrow for westbound to southbound left turning traffic. e The vehicular entrances/exits to the site are clearly visible to traffic on Route 25. Thus, the sight distances in the vicinity of these points are adequate. No nearby adjacent driveways exist on Route 25 that will interfere with the operation of these access driveways. As a result, based on a traffic and safety standpoint, it is recommended that the proposed development of The Breakers at Lands End be approved. -37- I i 1989 ~-'MIC 1989 (II~FOS1TE 1989 ORMM3SI~E LOCATION/T]]~ (NO-BLrfLD ~k~FFIC W1]1t ~l~*'~'lC WITH ALT~NATIVE ) SITE-~E~gtD SITE-~I~RATED ~I~IC TRAFFIC & SIGII~ Route 25/Comty Road 48 at Main Street - Weekday 8:00 - 9:00 A.M. C F B 5:00 - 6:00 P.M. E F B - Saturday 12:00 Noon - 1:00 P.M. D F B i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I ! I I ! I I I I I I 1988 TRAFFIC* (NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE) Includes: 1. Adjustment in traffic volumes to project 1989 summer traffic volumes. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCt4: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 I O ENT I FY I N G I N F 0 Rt~AT I ON AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR 9 AREA POPULATION ................................. 50000 NAHE OF THE EAST/WEST STREET .................... RT 25 / CR 48 NAHE OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET .................. HAIN ST NAHE OF THE ANALYST ............................. DUNN ENGINEERING DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) ................. 3-1-88 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED 8:00-9:00 AM OTHER INFORMATION: ~89 NO BUILD INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHSOUNO: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUHES LEFT EB W8 NB SB 0 159 89 -- THRU 120 195 0 RIGHT 101 0 95 -- NUMBER OF LANES LANES EB WB NB SB i 2 2 -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0.00 NORTHBOUND 0.00 SOUTHBOUND ..... PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS 0,00 90 20 N 90 20 N 90 30 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION EASTBOUNO WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES '/ ,. HOTORCYCLES 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP HINOR RIGHTS NB 5,90 5,90 0.00 5,90 MAJOR LEFTS W8 5.20 5.20 0.00 5.20 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.10 7.10 0.00 7.10 I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 MOVEHENT POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ................................................... HINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 106 381 327 327 221 C 113 806 806 806 692 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 190 942 942 942 752 A I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIONALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-t IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .................................. 9 AREA POPULATION .................................. 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... RT 25 / CR 48 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... MAIN ST NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. OUNN ENGINEERING CATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 3-1-88 TIHE PERIOD ANALYZED 5:00 ~:00 PM OTHER INFORMATION: '89 NO BUILD INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEFT THRU RIGHT EB WB NB SB 0 228 122 -- 152 294 O -- 88 0 222 -- NUMBER OF LANES LANES EB WB NB SB 1 2 2 -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTHENT FACTORS Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN GRADE ANGLE EASTBOUND 0.00 90 WESTBOUND 0.00 90 NORTHBOUND 0.00 SOUTHBOUND ..... CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS 2O N 20 N 90 30 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED (Table 10-2) VALUE SIGHT DIST. FINAL ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.90 5.90 0,00 5.90 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.20 5.20 0,00 5.20 MINOR LEFTS NB 7,10 7,10 0.00 7.10 I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 MOVEMENT POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 14~ 266 206 206 60 E 265 780 780 780 515 A I'JAJOR STREET WB LEFT 272 922 922 922 649 A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .................................. 9 AREA POPULATION .................................. 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... RT 25 / CR 48 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... MAIN ST NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. DUNN ENGINEERING DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/77) .................. 3-1-88 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. 12:00-1:00 PM SAT. OTHER INFORMATION: '89 NO BUILD INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTI ON TYPE: T-INTERSECTI ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEFT THRU RIGHT EB WB NB SB 0 195 121 -- 181 181 0 -- 123 0 216 -- NUMBER OF LANES LANES EB WB NB S8 1 2 2 -- m I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I ADJUSTI'~ENT FACTORS Page-2 EASTBOUND PERCEI'.IT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS 0,00 ~0 20 ht WESTBOUND 0.00 f~O 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 'PO 30 N SOUTHBOLII'.ID ..... VEHICLE COMPOSITION EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHOOUilD .,. SU TRUCKS,. COMBINATION AND RU'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 CRITICAL i_SAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE AD~TUSTI'dENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5. ?0 5 · 90 0,00 5...'PO MAJOR LEFTS UB 5.20 5.20 0.00 5.20 M I i',IOR LEFTS NB 7 · ] 0 7·10 0,00 7. I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 MOVEMENT POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT MAJOR STREET 145 324 258 258 114 D 258 736 736 736 478 A WB LEFT 233 854 854 854 421 A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Includes: 1. 2. 1989 COMPOSITE TRAFFIC* WITH THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END Adjustments in traffic volumes to project 1989 summer traffic volumes. Anticipated traffic generated by the fully developed and occupied Breakers at Lands End. i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYINO INFORMATION AVERAOE RUNNIN~ SPEED~ MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .................................. 9 AREA POPULATION .................................. 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/~EST STREET ..................... RT 25 / CR 48 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... MAIN ST NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. DUNN ENOINEERING DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) .................. 3-1-88 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. 8:00-9:00 AM OTHER INFORMATION: '89 W/ SITE INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 371 89 -- THRU 252 454 0 -- RIGHT 101 0 202 -- NUMBER OF LANES LAN E S EB W8 N8 S8 1 2 2 -- I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0.00 NORTHBOUND 0.00 SOUTHBOUND ..... PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS 0.00 90 20 N 90 20 N 90 30 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ,. SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES '/ ,. MOTORC'(CLES 5 5 5 5 0 5 5 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTHENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5,90 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.20 5.20 0.00 5,20 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.10 7.10 0.00 7.10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 MOVEMENT POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 106 131 69 69 -37 F 241 678 678 678 436 A MAJOR STREET W8 LEFT 443 802 802 802 359 B I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .................................. 9 AREA POPULATION .................................. 50000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ..................... RT 25 / CR 48 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ................... MAIN ST NAME OF THE ANALYST .............................. DUNN ENGINEERING DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/xx) .................. 3-1-88 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............................. 5:00-&:O0 PM OTHER INFORMATION: '89 W/ SITE INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEFT E8 W8 NB SB 0 489 122 -- THRU 348 612 0 -- RIGHT 88 0 517 -- NUMBER OF LANES LANES EB WB NB SB 1 2 2 -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Pa§e-2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 0.00 NORTHBOUND 0.00 SOUTHBOUND ..... PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURS RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS 0.00 90 20 N 90 20 N 90 30 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION EASTBOUND % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES 5 5 0 WESTBOUND 5 5 0 NORTHBOUND 5 5 0 SOUTHBOUND ......... CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.20 5.20 0.00 5.20 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.10 7.10 0.00 7.10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 MOVEMENT POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 14~ 75 18 RIGHT 618 595 595 18 595 -127 -22 F F MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 584 725 725 725 141 O I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCl'~: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET .............. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............................ AREA POPULATION ............................ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ............... NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ............. NAME OF THE ANALYST ........................ DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) ............ TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ....................... OTHER INFORMATION: '89 W/ SITE INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ... 50000 ... RT 25 / CR 48 ... MAIN ST ... DUNN ENGINEERING ... 3-1-88 ... 12:00-1:00 PM SAT. INTERSECTI ON TYPE: T-INTERSECTI ON MAJOR STREET OIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES LEFT THRU RIGHT EB WB NB S8 0 42~ 121 -- 401 395 0 123 0 475 NUMBER OF LANES LANES EB WB NB SB 1 2 2 -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 EASTBOUND PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURS RADIUS (ft) GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS 0.00 90 20 ACCELERATION LANE FOR RIGHT TURNS N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 30 N SOLF[HBOUND ..... VEHICLE COMPOSITION EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND ,. SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV'S' VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTHENT CRITICAL GAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5.90 5.90 0.00 5.90 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.20 5.20 0.00 5.20 MINOR LEFTS N8 7.10 7.10 0.00 7.10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-$ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 145 101 27 27 -118 F RIGHT 567 540 540 540 -27 F MAJOR STREET LEFT 509 445 645 645 136 D I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Includes: 1. 2. 1989 COMPOSITE TRAFFIC* WITH THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END AND PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL Adjustments in traffic volumes to project 1989 summer traffic volumes. Anticipated traffic generated by the fully developed and occupied Breakers at Lands End. I~GE 1 DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. 3/?,/ 1988 ~I~TERSECT I 0N : 48 @ N'(S RT 25 ;~ Ih I hi ST EEKDAY 8:00-9:00 AM ACTUATED SI GNAL BREAKERS 2548Ai I789 W/ SITE CBD ? N VOLUME IPROACH UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT 392 1.00 392 0.00 0.29 I TR 353 ADJUSTMENT L 371 412 1.00 412 1.00 0,00 T 454 504 1.00 504 0.00 0.00 89 99 1.00 99 1,00 0.00 202 224 1.00 224 0,00 1.00 i IDEAL # OF .............. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ............... ADJ, P MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW B TR 1800 1 1.10 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1669 IdB L 1800 1 0.94 0,98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.75 1575 I T 1800 I 1,00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1764 N8 L 1800 1 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1499 i R 1800 1 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 0.85 1.00 1499 TERSECTI ON : 48 ~ NYS RT 25 ~ IN ST EKDA"( 8:00-9:00 TUATEO SIGNAL DUNN ENGINEERING, BREAKERS 1989 W/ SITE CBD ? N 8/9/1988 2548A1 CAPACITY ANALYSIS I LN GR ADJ FLOW PHSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP i'~VH RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO ........ ' ...................................... 392 0 1669 0.235 Y 0.400 668 0.587 B L 143 269 1575 0.091 Y 0.267 420 0.340 T 504 0 1764 0.286 N 0.667 1176 0.429 99 0 1499 0.066 N 0.250 375 0.264 224 0 1499 0.149 Y 0.517 774 0.289 iifCLE LENGTH : 60.0 ]SS TII"IE PER C'(CLE : 6 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0.475 INTERSECTION V/C : 0.528 L 0,264 0.250 60 13.7 375 0.1 1.00 13.8 8 R 0,289 0.517 60 6.3 774 0.1 0.85 5,4 B 7.9 B LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN OR LN GR APP APP I PP MUH RATIO RATIO L~q DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB TR 0.587 0,400 60 10.7 668 1.0 0.85 9.9 8 9.8 8 ~B L 0,340 0,267 60 13.5 420 0.2 1.00 13.7 8 i T 0,429 0.667 60 3,5 1176 0.2 0.85 3.1 A 7.9 B 8 ! INTERSECTION DELAY : 8.3 secs/veh LEUEL OF SERVICE : B I TERSECTI ON : 48 @ N'(S RT 25 @ IN ST EKDAY 8:00-?:00 AM TUATEO SIGNAL DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. BREAKERS 1989 W/ SITE CBD?N 3/9/1988 2548A1 ROADWAY CONDITIONS BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 I TRAFFIC & GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. APP (%) '/ (,,) Y/N Nm ................. 0 5 N 0 WB 0 5 N 0 I N8 0 5 N 0 I GEOMETRI CS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME I 2 3 IAPP LT TH RT MVH LNS WD HVM LNS WD HVH LNS WD EB 0 252 101 TR 1 15.0 I WB 371 454 0 L 1 10.0 T 1 12.0 NB 89 0 202 L 1 12.0 R 1 12.0 S I G N A L P H A S I N G APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R EB 1 TR R 24 36 14B ! L T L 24 36 I WB 2 L T L 16 44 NB 2 R R 16 44 N8 3 L R LR 15 45 I I I I I I I I I I I I 3,/%/1 ?88 DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. INTERSECTION 2548A1 N W -+- E S NYS RT 25 E/W STREET I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 --~> V CR 48 E/U STREET 252 EB TOTgL 353 101 /\ MA IN ST N/S STREET 8,° 202 <. . :,'. I I I I NB TOTAL 271 454 WB TOTAL 825 i'GE 1 ITERSECTI ON : 48 @ NYS RT 25 @ lin ST EKDAY 5:00-6:00 PM ACTUATED SI GNAL DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C, BREAKERS 3/?/1988 2548P1 1989 W/ SITE CBD ? N VOLUME ADJUSTMENT I'PROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS HVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT ET TR 43~ 484 1.00 484 0,00 0,20 489 543 1.00 543 1.00 0.00 612 680 1.00 680 0.00 0.00 NB L 122 136 1.00 136 1.00 0.00 I R 517 574 1.00 574 0.00 1.00 IDEAL # OF P MVH SAT FLOW LANES i TR 1800 1 W8 L 1800 I I T 1800 I NB L 1800 1 i R 1800 .............. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ............... ADJ, WIDTH H.V, GRADE PARK 8US AREA RT LT FLOW 1.10 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 I&88 0,94 0.98 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 0,95 1575 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 17&4 1,00 0.98 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.85 1499 1,00 0,98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1479 IGE 2 ITERSECTI ON : 48 @ N"(S RT 25 @ i~ ! N ST !EK DA"( 5:00-6:00 PH ACTUATED SI GNAL DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. BREAKERS 3/9/1988 2548P1 1989 W/ SITE CBD ? N CAPACITY ANALYSIS I LN GR AD,] FLOW PHSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP HUH RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO TR 484 0 1688 0.287 'Y 0.400 675 0.717 299 244 1575 0.190 Y 0,267 420 0.712 680 0 1764 0.385 N 0.667 1176 0.578 136 0 1499 0.091 0.250 375 0.363 574 0 149~ 0.383 'Y 0.517 774 0.742 ICLELENGYH 60,0 : SS TIHE PER CYCLE SUH OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOI~J RATIOS : 0.860 INTERSECTION V/C : 0.956 i LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd P ~l~M RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF E8 TR 0.717 0.400 60 11.5 675 2.5 0.85 I W8 L 0.712 0.267 60 15.1 420 3.8 1.00  T 0.578 0.667 60 4.1 1176 0.5 0.85 L 0.3~3 0.250 50 14.1 375 0.3 1.00 i R 0,742 0.517 60 8.6 774 2.7 0.85 I LN GR LN GR APP APP DELAY LOS DELAY LOS 11.9 8 11.9 8 18.9 C 3.9 A 10.6 B 14.4 B 9.6 B 10.5 B INTERSECTION DELAY : 10.8 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : B I I I I I DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. 3/9/1988 BREAKERS 2548P1 ,ITERSECT I ON : 48 ~ N'(S RT 25 @ liN ST EKDAY 5:00-6:00 PN1989 W/ SITE CBD?N ACTUATED SI GNAL I' ......... ................ BUSES CONF. REDS RED BUTTON ARR (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE 0 0,90 0 N 0.0 3 0 0,90 0 N 0,0 3 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. /P_P_ (%) (%) Y/N Nm EB 0 5 N 0 WB 0 5 N 0 I NB 0 5 hi 0 LANE GROUPS I VOLUHE I 2 3 A P P LT T H RT M'JH LN S WD H'JH LN S WD MVH LN S W D EB 0 348 88 TR 1 15.0 I W8 489 612 0 L 1 I0.0 T 1 12,0 N8 122 0 517 L 1 12.0 R 1 12.0 SIGNAL PHASING l APP PHASE IST MV 2ND MV 3RD HV PROT PMSV G "(+R EB 1 TR R 24 36 WB I L T L 24 3~ I WB 2 L T L 44 NB 2 R R 16 44 NB 3 L R LR 15 45 I I I I I I 3/?/1 ?88 DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. INTERSECTION 2548P1 N W -+- E t $ NYS RT 25 E./W STREET I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 --*> U CR 48 E/W STREET 348 EB TOTAL 436 88 V MA I N ST I',l.,/S STREET 122 517 <, , > I I I I NB TOTAL 639 612 WB TOTAL 48? 1101 V IGE1 DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C, 3/9/1988 ITERSECTI ON : 48 @ NYS RT 25 @ lIN ST T. 12:00-1:00 PH ACTUATED SI GNAL BREAKERS 2548S1 1989 W/ SITE CBD ? N ADJUSTMENT ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS RATE LT RT 582 0.00 0.23 VOLUHE IIPROACH LANE GROUP MVH VOLUHE I TR 524 FLOW RATE LANE UTIL IN GROUP FACTOR 582 1.00 426 473 1.00 473 1.00 0.00 395 439 1,00 439 0.00 0.00 121 134 1,00 134 1.00 0.00 475 528 1.00 528 0.00 1.00 I IDEAL ~ OF P HVH SAT FLOW LANES i TR 1800 1 W8 L 1800 1 I T 1800 1 NB L 1800 1 I R 1800 1 .............. ADJUSTHENT FACTORS ............... ADd, WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK 8US AREA RT LT FLOW 1.10 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 1688 0,94 0,98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,95 1575 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1764 1,00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 0.85 1499 1,00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1499 I I I I I I IGE2 DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. 3/9/1988 TERSECTION : 48 @ N'(S RT 25 @ I IN ST 'T, 12:00-1:00 PM ACTUATED SIGNAL BREAKERS 2548SI 1989 W/ SITE CBD ? N CAPACITY ANALYSIS I LN GR ADJ FLOW PNSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V./C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO I- ;; ............................................... 582 0 1688 0.345 Y 0.467 788 0.739 · I! L 269 204 1575 0,171 Y 0.250 394 0.683 T 439 0 1764 0.249 N 0.717 1264 0.347 0.089 N 0,200 300 0.447 L 134 0 1499 R 528 0 I499 0.352 Y 0,450 675 0,782 ICLE LENGTH 60.0 SS TIME PER CYCLE : 6 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0.868 INTERSECTION V/C : 0.964 LN GR V/C GREEN C'YC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP ,IP MVN RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS EB TR 0.739 0.467 60 9.9 788 2.6 0.85 I0,6 B I0.6 B WB L 0.683 0,250 60 15.5 394 3,3 1.00 18.8 C T 0.347 0.717 60 2.4 1264 0.1 0.85 2.1 A 10.7 B L 0.447 0.200 60 16.0 300 0.7 1.00 16.7 C R 0.782 0.450 60 10.6 675 4.1 0.85 12.5 8 13.3 B ! I INTERSECTION DELA'Y : 11.5 secs,/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : B I I I I DUNN ENGINEERING, P.C. 3/9/1~88 TERSECTI ON : 48 @ NYS RT 25 8 '~-~tll ST 12:00-1:00 PH ACTUATED SIGNAL BREAKERS 2548S1 1989 W/ SITE CBD?N GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR PP (Y.) (,.) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) ¥/N SEC TYPE 0 5 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 W8 0 5 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 I NB 0 5 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 LANE GROUPS i VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 0 401 123 TR 1 15.0 I WB 425 395 0 L 1 10.0 T 1 12.0 N8 121 0 475 L I 12.0 R 1 12.0 SIGNAL PHASING l APP PHASE 1ST MV 2NO MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R EB 1 TR R 28 32 W8 1 L T L 28 32 I WB 2 L T L 15 45 NB 2 R R 15 45 NB 3 L R LR 12 48 3.,/9/1988 I I I I DUNN ENGINEERING, P,C. INTERSECTION 2548S1 N I W -+- E S N"(S RT 25 E/W STREET I I I I I I I I I I I I I CR 48 E/W STREET 401 EB TOTAL 524 123 %;/ HA 11'4 ST N/S STREET 121 475 <, ,> I I I { NB TOTAL 595 *--- V 395 426 V WB TOTAL 821 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Traffic Volume Counts rn p,¢ -/'-or,,/ SUFFDi. fl DDONTY DEPT. OF ~J~IC 140flS8 ! HOUR, I CH~NEL VEHICLE COUNT OURI)ECTIDN FACTOR.. 1. O0 SITE FILE: £R4BE-IO BEGINS G 7 8 ..................... 8 7 3 4 I0 B 10 9 7 95 88 89 83 83 88 75 63 ~ ~8 353 310 31§ 315 I68 134 ~1 ~4 ~4 ~6 335 28~ 254 147 ~0 203 ,-~.1 251 212 ~3 230 390 31! 264 ~14 ~}0 L:93 E63 3~4 ~7 ~34 401 310 E$8 EBO ~79 ~7 303 ~67 ~(3 474 333 E89 ~86 3~8 315 378 319 533 4!8 32~ 349 346 ~7 41~ 358 $~2 ~ $~3 332 353 369 337 343 317 ~4 322 !96 195 P_24 ~51 301 ~33 2[~ 167 I~8 149 163 154 ~18 IB~ I84 I~5 160 79 92 94 90 175 106 155 103 85 97 98 98 159 107 IO~ 83 103 67 65 76 8) 168 93 IO~ 6I 90 I I1 43 43 59 GO ~ 59 86 47 61 % AVG Wf<D,~Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 !.00 % AV6 {)AY' 1.00 1.0~ 1.00 1.00 m AN PEFg( 1~ 7 7 7 7 8 m ~ FL(~ 298 29~ 353 310 335 FLOg ~4 349 353 369 1.00 1.00 11 Il 434 401 513 501 m m m ~FDU( COI~'4T~ DEPT. ~ PUBLIC WDiqIqS SITE ~'{O.: COt(TRCL m I HOUR~ I CHI~,tNEL ',~EHICLE COL~t[ CR 48 E/O ELIJP,)(~$ L~t(E WB CJSRRECTI[R4 Fi)CTDR: l. O0 WEE}( D~ ~NDAY OCTOBER 6, 1986 FILE: m ,,4 15 6 6 !2 9 10 Ii i3 10 m ~ 42 33 40 43 38 39 ~ 13 7 311 297 323 ~3 306 312 135 74 253 6 332 311 347 371 314 335 173 142 284 10 234 204 20~ 2~ 27! 23q 31G 271 Il 260 213 233 238 294 248 292 307 262 I !2 210 186 241 260 278 23~ 3lB 415 272 I ~39 253 253 262 273 257 343 446 297 m 2 280 2,3,0 308 310 313 301 378 536 3 ~92 331 379 35~ 3% 353 356 562 ~87 4 340 ~5 372 348 348 347 3?2 612 m 5 ~2S 238 304 314 331 314 317 552 343 6 208 198 210 ~39 245 220 303 455 265 7 !00 135 171 169 147 144 I~3 34? 8 78 60 81 69 99 77 1~ =8~ 118 m ~ 60 51 94 $1 123 150 10 47 4,2 28 35 57 4~ 79 ~ 49 II 19 29 29 28 33 28 70 31 34 m TO?ALS 3800 36~4 3927 4104 4264 3372 438! 5576 4259 m % AvG woDfiY' 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~./: l.oo 1.00 % ~ DAY 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ! AM PEJq~ HR 8 8 8 8 B I0 PE~ FLD~ 332 311 347 371 314 316 307 ! ~ PB~R HR ~ 3 3 3 3 ~ m PEA~ FLD~ 340 331 379 365 3% $~2 61~ m m SUFFO~ COUNTY DEPT. DF PUBLIC I,IDRKS SITE NO.: EDI4[RL~ m i ~R~ 1 cH~ VEH!C~ ~L~T E/O LA~E E8 CORRECTION FACTOR: 1,00 WEE~ OF ~]N~'/ AUGUST (, 1386 FILE: BEGINS 4 5 6 7 ! AVERAGE ! ~ 16 15 IG 1! 16 51 20 7 11 3 2 7 5 9 7 B 25 13 10 4 5 6 JO 8 3 G 27 23 12 m 5 31 30 38 26. §! 3~ 61 39 33 G i19 125 121 98 107 114 ~j 77 106 mo 295 3~3 299 284 265 2)7 ~0 171 m 11 341 ,t~4 322 3!2 313 ~6 530 415 377 p~ 1~ 340 333 362 3~8 3~5 350 52~ 4~8 3~ I 31G 330 335 ~7 416 351 5~ 433 397 m 302 337 4~i 330 450 404 317 3 327 ~s 333 365 488 363 ~7 371 376 4 390 374 3.38 ~8 510 420 ~5 26~ 385 m 5 360 383 375 403 440 392 ~i 226 m 8 148 158 148 178 314 lB9 }83 1~5 i~3 9 1{4 127 130 146 301 164 147 104 153 10 llO 127 107 145 ~55 149 !~1 3~ 141 m ,~,1. 4s 70 84 99 173 95 119 51 92 m TOTff~s 4525 4707 4745 4867 6059 4361 5937 4563 5066 m /~ % RVG WRDAY 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 % RVB ~Y i. O0 1.00 i. O0 1.00 1.00 I.(,0 l. O0 ! RK PEA~ HR 11 11 11 11 11 I! 11 mpE~ FL~ 3~i 3}4 322 312 313 590 415 m pM pERK HR PEP~ FLOW 390 383 398 428 §10 5~4 499 m m m SUFFL)LK COUNTY DEPT. 0-' PUBLIC ! HOUF), 1 CNANNEL VEHICLE COUNT ODRREOTION FACTOR: SITE N(].: [OHTRD_ CR 48 E/O ELIJAH'S LANE WEEK OF MONDAY PUS]ST 4, FILE: Cg48W-O8 BEBIN9 4 5 G 7 I AVEflAGE 2 $ QVE~]E !2 32 !9 17 m I iG 19 IG 3 13 5 3 m 5 68 41 31 G lTO 168 139 7 296 30! 257 m 8 370 346 3,22 9 347 2~B 315 10 3~8 2]B 317 m 11 3~8 268 3oA pM m 1 339 296 309 R 362 332 367 3 357 359 381 4 431 ~11 433 m 5 391 345 387 6 291 254 278 7 2~2 196 216 m 8 218 Igl 151 9 109 12~ 137 10 82 1~ 16 22 21 43 ~6 17 20 18 25 43 22 5 4 5 17 17 8 4 7 G 14 13 43 42 45 30 30 41 1~0 146 153 65 ~R 260 250 273 126 7~ 263 340 348 345 190 !34 ~3 ~OG 280 agl $~0 226 ~89 330 312 356 277 3!3 315 320 307 3E~ 348 315 302 316 280 360 ~01 309 327 338 322 408 441 351 360 3~0 362 371 586 3)5 354 382 367 365 58~ 3?8 ~05 414 419 ~12 532 434 364 384 374 4~0 G$O 416 2~3 311 275 3IB ~g4 314 lfi~ L~JO ~g 2~! 465 250 158 188 181 ~!I 358 211 I16 172 131 206 350 173 82 140 103 m TOTALS 5140 4G~al 47gg 4G58 5090 4871 5207 6416 5140 m % AVG WKDAY % A~ DRY I AM PEAK m pEp~ FLDW / 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i. O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 370 346 322 340 348 3~0 348 m pM PEAK HR ~AX FLD~ 431 411 433 405 414 ~IE 630 m m -- HOUR OUFFUU( COUNT'/ D£i~T. OF I HOUR, I CHI~NEL VEHICLE COUNI' CORRECTION FACTSR: SITE NO.: [DNTRDL FILE': CR ~B E/O ELIJAH~S L~(E EB WEE~ DF ~'/SE~IE~BER 2~, 1986 ~)(]NI~q Y TUESDAY WEDNESOAY THUFtSDAY FI~IBAY WEE~I)AY SATURDAY SUI(DAY 7 DAY BEGIN~ 2~ 23 2~ ~ 19 ~¢ERAGE' ~0 ~! AVERKFuE 9 9 9 2 2 3 20 Z~ 293 ~5 21G ~ ~3 261 237 317 359 33~ 373 ~G 217 ~63 178 B5 76 5 ~ 3 3 ~2 80 7 16 16 88 13 51 ~8 25 95 8~ 109 98 9! 65 32 312 890 307 310 lEO 14! 264 3~7 ~1 308 297 82~ 1~5 265 ~25 182 215 810 335 311 8~2 27~ 885 303 ~I 3G5 381 236 8?8 2~8 36~ ~7 38G 366 238 ~8 2~3 2G3 850 33Z ~18 302 ~5 301 316 876 371 368 303 288 32~ ~13 330 3~5 356 333 332 352 483 385 334 301 36G 360 330 380 355 277 2~8 3~7 160 143 ~99 189 192 136 188 89 93 8t~ 115 1~6 118 HG 8+ 3~ 803 113 39 67 107 73 68 183 95 38 57 30 11 36 ~2 58 ~ 180 68 77 42 BI m TOTALS 3856 J-'~,~. 40~0 3793 5052 4140 4543 405~ 4185 % AVG WK~Y l. O0 1.00 1.00 // 1.00 1.0~ % AVO ~Y 1.00 t. O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.O0 AM PEF~ H~ 7 7 B 7 8 11 11 m i~E~ FLDW ~ 335 327 8~B 3t98 3B5 38t PM PEAK H~ 4 5 4 ~ ~ l m ~E~ FLDW 3~ 373 392 352 483 398 m m I I I ~JFFD(.~ L~)UNTY DEPT, OF PUBLIC W~}(9 ! HOUR, ! CH~NNEL VEHICLE COUNT COR~{ECTIDN FACTDR: l. O0 _! ..... E~L"~_ ...... ~ ....... i~_ ....... i! ........ ~ ....... '_'_ ....... &~_~ .......... f! ........ J! ......... ~_!L~ I2 ~ § 7 ~ IO 8 B 8 8 I 10 3 2 3 2 3 5 3 t2 9 5 8 332 3~5 340 344 319 332 203 102 282 m 10 275 183 RiI 233 244 229 288 260 242 1! ~2 27 248 212 237 237 289 336 m i 236 29 249 23s 237 237 30! 400 27o 3 348 3~0 372 368 306 343 40tl 5t~ 374 m 4 347 370 3~ 335 30<) 341 ~(~ 400 365 ~ 350 ~9R 322 310 363 3~7 332 4~7 342 ~ 167 179 231 224 238 ~$ 33s 364 248 m 7 l~ I22 l~ 180 180 161 223 232 186 8 81 67 80 10~ 86 83 !69 24~ i18 9 78 66 86 77 105 83 !07 103 m 10 63 70 ~G 73 ~ 63 10~ 106 75 il 26 i9 27 27 29 ~ 98 92 Ii3TALS 4015 36.37 4019 3995 39,811 3931 433i 4~0 4i21 m m % AVE W}(DAY 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.(>0 1,00 % A'Vt) DAY 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 m AM PEFh'( HR 8 0 0 8 8 9 Il PiE~ FI.O~ ~ 3~ 340 344 ,319 295 336 m P~ PEAR HR § 4 3 3 5 3 3 PEAK FL~ 3S,0 370 372 36B 363 400 50S m m ~UFFOLK COUNTY OEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS I HOUR, I CHANNEL VEHICLE COUNT CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.00 BEGIXS 88 87 28 83 23 AVERqGE .Z~ £5 AVERPGE lO 14 * * * 12 ~n 36 25 7 9 180 119 * * 288 878 * * * 850 ~(~ 1!~ 266 ! I ? I0 !1 i2 388 * * * * 338 5'i9 257 1 8g~ * * * * 233 5i7 E~ 3 317 * * * 4!7 367 S7~ 8!5 332 I 5 358 * * * 404 ~81 Z5~, !ES 7 157 * * * 347 858 8~E !5! 224 8 107 * * * 353 830 17~ !!7 !97 !I 7I * * * 170!a! =:4! 35 ! ......................................................................................... ii .............................. TOTALS 4258 1288 AVG WKD~Y 1.00 0.00 ~VO D~Y 1.00 0.00 AM PEAK HR 11 7 PEAH FLOW 887 878 PM PEAK HR 4 PEAK FLOW 384 * 0 0 3385 A922 59~7 ~15G !743 0.00 O. 00 0. O0 1, O0 O. 00 1. O0 i, '.:9 I. 00 m m SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS SITE NO.: CR~S-6 ~i~ FILE: 04$-OEW I HOUR, 1 CHANNEL VEHICLE COUNT CR48 1500FE EL!3p=S CORRECTIO~ FACTOR: 1,00 ~EE~ 0 BEGINS 2G e7 ~a 2~ 2~ AVERAGE m 12 ~3 19 * * ~ G! E~ 75 '47 ! 4 10 * * * 7 ~ 2~ 20 m 2 lB 4 * ~ * 11 !~ 29 17 3 ~ 8 * * * 9 !? · 5 52 33 * * * ~3 £7 6 149 132 * * * 141 71 Z5 ~7 7 2~1 ~78 * * * GSO !i7 m 8 300 294 , , , 297 l~q 119 224 9 341 250 * * * 296 324 !e'? 274 lO 335 G63 * * * ~R9 ~3 11 337 * * * * 337 ~9 3'~G 337 12 277 * * * * 277 J£? ~2 343 i 335 * * * * 335 ~:5 3 354 * * * 333 344 3:3 4:~ 378 i 5 358 * * * 384 371 3:: 8 158 * * * 177 168 ::: S~: 291 10 88 * * * 138 113 :~i 11 41 * * * ~5 68 !:0 51~ 75 mTOTALS 47B0 1EgB 0 0 2214 4788 5E'~G 4~£::~ I % AVG WKDAY 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % AVG DAY 1.00 0.00 0,00 0.(" 0.00 L'>" I.~"'" m A~ PEAK HR 9 8 * ~ * ~ P~K FLOW 341 ~94 * * * 389 m PM PEAK HR 5 * * * 5 E mpEAK FLOW 358 * * * 384 2:~ m m I I 1984 1985 1986 1987' CARS ~IRU(~S C2~RSIlRUCKS CARS ~llU~<S C2kRS~RUCKS January 4500 350 4400 350 5100 410 6500 400 Februmry 5000 330 49OO 350 5500 410 7000 450 Mard~ 5500 710 6000 870 7900 820 7500 800 A~il 8000 830 10,250 860 10,000 1080 12,000 1~0 May 11,000 690 15,000 750 16,000 850 19,000 1010 Jtme 15,900 500 18,000 790 21,500 920 22,000 1100 July* 24,000 810 27,000 1100 29,000 1180 27,000'~ 1030 August* 30,000 1180 32,500 1340 32,800 1380 35,000 1270 September 21,000 850 20,500*m 1100 22,000 1080 24,000 1120 October 12,000 740 15,000 950 18,000 1030 17,900 900 November 10,000 660 11,500 680 14,000 670 14,500 610 Decemtmr 7,000 380 9,000 480 9,000 500 9,500 480 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I * Starting in July ard August of 1986 2 boats were utilized during these t~o months. ** ColLision cut down on capacity. *** Hurricane ~loria. EXPERIENCE OF WOLOWITZ ORGANIZATION 1901 1965 1965 1964-1967 1905 1966 1968 [907 1968 19{9 1970-1971 ]971 t972 1974 1970 978 1979 1980 I'i}81)-i981 198]-1982 i982~1983 Brian IJomes, Commack, (W~cks Road) [58 Convcntional and FIiA Homes Price: $1(:,i)[I(}-Sl8,000 Con,ploted in iS months ]~rkan Homes, Po~'t .lefferson 38 I;N~ and VA tlomes Price: $12,000-514,000 Cch.pitted Jn 8 months TOM~ Line Estates, Town Line Read, (o~;,nmck 385 Price: $24,000-$28,000 Uni ts Clay Pits Road, Commack 05 Units Price: i,425,800 3'30,000 Soutbwoed at Eayshore, }!onto. uk l!ighwa? I05 [mits Price: ilarbcu~ ~cw Scuth Apartments 285 St. Harks Ptace, Staten island 90 Units, Six stery [tarbour k2ex~ North Apartments ¢~0 tlamJlton Avenue, Staten l?land Il0 Units, ilion <ak Xeck Estates, West ]slip 52 Units Price: Brian Ilomcs, Staten Island 225 UnSts, FIIA, ] attache4 Price: $24,000 $40,000 La Eonpe x. jc Xpi~rt:mcnts 240 ReLtal Units, Coram blajestic (;ardens 40 one kamily frame uetached lion.es Frice: $60,000 $80,(~00 $50,000-$52 & Z Iamily iii Patchogue Custom Homes Price: ~100,O0(] },'or ~ bpoe1 28 ilonic s La Bonrm Vic ][ 64(} Re:,ta[ Units SagtJkos ~,!i~cr, he>t Nay Shcic 20 ($100,000 ran. ge) l','oc, dbuxy [slates 84 one tamiZy Soutlnwocd ~t Patchogue 88 Non:es Hariour Yalley 17om~5, Steers Pot:d, Custom Hemes: West Bavs},o~e, Kings Point, 1)ix IlJlls, Woodbury, Oyster Pay i]cve, New]ett Ba} Park Dav~dsen Alvmhmm, 1)ee~ Pa-rk 40,000 square Feot extension CoFperf2eld Lane, OJd Westbury 8 tiomes Custom qua12tp Bridle Acres, Huttontewn 11 Homes TIIE I~ARBOUR CN,E, 25 Condeminhm Un,ts, Baldx, h~ lia~bor Approx2mate sales price: $110,000 TIIE b~IDDi. E EAY CLUB, 42 Condominiui:~ bnits, Ocea~side Approximate ssle~ price: $105,00(; PROPOSED AMENDED GRANT OF SCENIC EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this day of , 1983, by and between BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, a co-partnership, with offices c/o Gus Schad, 690 Deer Park Avenue, Dix Hills, New York, hereinafter called the Grantor, and THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, a municipal corporation having of business at 53095 Main Road, Southold, hereinafter called the Grantee. its principal New York, place WHEREAS, there exists a Grant of Scenic Easement agreement covering portions of the Grantor's land, dated July 15, 1971, and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on December 13, 1971 in Liber 7066, page 386; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to modify the aforesaid Grant of Scenic Easement by cancelling same and placing in its stead the following Grant of Scenic Easement on other property of the Grantor, more particularly described in Schedule A herein; and WHEREAS, said premises constitute an area of natural scenic beauty and whose existing openness, natural con- dition, or present state of use, if retained, would enhance the present or potential value of abutting and surrounding properties and would maintain or enhance the conservation of natural or scenic resourses; and WHEREAS, the Grantor wishes to grant a scenic easement to the Grantee affecting the premises described in Schedule A; and WHEREAS, interest to acquire the preservation of the Grantee deems it to be in the public interest or rights in real property for open space and areas to preserve the beauty and natural conditions Southold; and of lands in the Town of WHEREAS, Section 247 of the General Municipal Law of the State of New York provides that municipalities, including Towns, may acquire the fee or any lesser interest, development right, easement, covenant or other contractual right necessary to achieve the aforementioned purposes to land within the Town; and WHEREAS, the Grantee in furtherance of the above policy and in accordance with Section 247 of the General Municipal Law, accepts the scenic easement affecting the premises described in Schedule A. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of ONE ($1.00) DOLLAR and other good and valuable consideration to the Grantor, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, this agreement wit- nesseth that: 1. The Grant of Scenic Easement agreement dated July 15, 1971 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on December 13, 1971 in Liber 7066, page 386, is hereby terminated and cancelled. 2. The Grantor does hereby donate, grant, transfer and convey unto the Town of Southold, a scenic easement in gross, of the nature, character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over and upon all those certain -2- plots, pieces or parcels of land as set forth and described in Schedule A annexed hereto and made a part hereof. 3. The nature, character and extent of the easement hereby granted is as follows: (a) No buildings or structures shall be erected on the premises, except fencing, utility structures and out- buildings which might be required by municipal agencies for the construction and maintenance of communal utilities, water or sewage systems, consisting of a treatment plant, pumping and lift stations and collection system, and other such appurtenances. (b) No lumbering operations shall be conducted on the premises and no trees shall be cut unless dead, diseased or decayed or for the better landscaping of the area or improvement of existing growth or as may be reasonably required in the construction of roads, equestrian trails, recharge areas or communal utility, water or sewage systems; (c) The land shall remain essentially in its natural state, except for landscaping and maintenance such as mowing of grass, the cleaning and removing of debris from the pond areas. (d) No topsoil shall be removed from the premises nor shall sand, gravel or other minerals be excavated therefrom for purposes of sale or use off the premises; nor shall sand, gravel or other minerals be stored upon the premises; -3- (e) The Grantee and its authorized agent shall have the right of inspection of the premises for the purpose of assuring itself that the Grantor is not in violation of any of the terms and conditions of this scenic easement, at any time. 4. The nature, character and extent of limitations on the within grant of scenic easement are as follows: (a) The premises shall not be open or available to the public for general or park use, but shall remain at all times in the exclusive possession of the Grantor, its suc- cessors and assigns in interest, and subject to its or their unqualified right to exclude others therefrom by any and all lawful means, except as indicated in paragraph 3(e); (b) Roads with necessary recharge basins for road drainage may be constructed to provide access to and from surrounding properties of the Grantor, as well as the construction of jogging paths and equestrian trails. (c) The within grant of scenic easement shall in no way affect the right of the Grantor to use the premises, for the uses herein permitted, and to do all such things thereon, not expressly forbidden herein, as a similarly situated landowner might do; (d) All right, interests and privileges of the Grantor in the premises not herein specifically donated, granted, transferred and conveyed, remain and reside with the Grantor, its successors and assigns. -4- 5. The waiver or acquiescence in any variation from any part of the restrictions and covenants herein by the grantee shall be effective only for the particular instance involved and shall not be deemed to limit the continuing force and effect of the restrictions and covenants. 6. If the whole or any part of the premises shall be condemned or taken by eminent domain, then this easement shall forthwith cease without need of any further writing from the date of title vesting in such proceeding. In such event the Grantor shall not be required to repay to any real property taxing authority any taxes reduced or abated as a result of this scenic easement; nor shall the value of the premises be limited by this easement; nor shall any part of any award belong to the Grantee. 7. The grantee hereby undertakes to cooperate to the extent legally permissible in having the valuation placed upon the premises for purposes of real estate taxation taken into account and limited by the restrictions imposed by this scenic easement, all in accordance with State of New York General Municipal Law §247. 8. This agreement shall be perpetual and shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their -5- hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES By Gus Schad, Partner TOWN OF SOUTHOLD By William R. Pell III Supervisor STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On the day of , 1983, before me personally came GUS SCHAD, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and who, being duly sworn by me, did depose and say that he is a member of the firm of BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, a co-partnership, and that he executed the foregoing instrument in the firm name of BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES and that he had authority to sign the same, and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of said firm for the uses and purposes therein men- tioned. Notary Public STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On the day of , 1983, before me came WILLIAM R. PELL III, to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at 530 Anglers Road, Greenport, New York; that he is the Supervisor of the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, the municipal corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said municipal corporation; that the seal affixed is such seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Town Board and that he signed his name thereto by like order. Notary Public -6- SCHEDULE A ALL those certain plots, pieces and parcels of land, situate lying and being near Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows: PARCEL I: BEGINNING at a point located on the southeasterly portion of the premises being described herein, which point is the northeasterly corner of land of Schofield and McIntosh, and is the following two courses and dis- tances from a monument located on the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25): (1) North 11° 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; and (2) North 19° 16' 00" West 344.00 feet; running thence from said point of beginning along land of Schofield and McIntosh, South 65° 47' 10" West 213.37 feet to a point; thence through land of Brecknock Associates the following two courses and distances: (1) South 65° 47' 10" West 330.84 feet; and (2) South 66° 36' 40" West 765.20 feet to land of Jem Realty Corp.; running thence along said last mentioned land the following three courses and distances: (1) North 41° 39' 10" West 505.36 feet; (2) North 65° 07' 50" East 367.40 feet; (3) North 32° 28' 10" West 290.00 feet; running thence through land of Brecknock Associates the following six courses and distances: (1) North 57° 16' 01" East 652.01 feet; (2) North 2° 50' 30" East 411.75 feet; (3) North 82° 04' 52" East 267.15 feet; (4) South 10° 34' 40" East 472.04 feet; (5) North 88° 32' 59" East 360.75 feet; (6) South 23° 51' 43" East 1,123.11 feet to the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25); running thence along the northerly side of North Road South 66° 01' 20" West 252.76 feet to land of Schofield and McIntosh; running thence along said last mentioned land the following two courses and distances: (1) North 11° 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; thence (2) North 19° 16' 00" West 344.00 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 31.8212 acres. PARCEL II: BEGINNING at a point located at the northwesterly corner of the premises being described herein, which point is distant the following seven courses and distances from the point on the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25) where the southeasterly corner of land of Jem Realty Corp. joins the south- westerly corner of land of Brecknock Associates: (1) North 41° 39' 10" West 1,084.54 feet; (2) North 65° 07' 50" East 367.40 feet; (3) North 32° 28' 10" West 982.87 feet; (4) North 32° 57' 20" West 410.00 feet; (5) North 44° 12' 35" East 564.01 feet; (6) North 25° 16' 36" East 398.13 feet; (7) North 58° 57' 15" East 471.09 feet; running thence from said point of beginning along the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound the following two courses and distances: (1) North 58° 57' 15" East 130.00 feet; thence (2) North 42° 36' 45" East 169.85 feet to land of Brecknock Associates; running thence through said last mentioned land the following eight courses and distances: (1) South 29° 32' 27" East 250.54 feet; (2) South 3° 43' 35" West 234.96 feet; (3) South 35° 57' 18" East 163.60 feet; (4) South 3° 13' 04" West 277.09 feet; (5) South 57° 49' 51" West 255.05 feet; (6) North 31° 02' 45" West 300.00 feet; (7) North 5° 13' 27" East 382.02 feet; thence (8) North 38° 52' 02" West 183.71 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 6.1046 acres. PROPOSED DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS DECLARATION made this BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, Schad, 690 Deer Park called the Declarant. WHEREAS, day of , 1983, by a co-partnership, with offices c/o Gus Avenue, Dix Hills, New York, hereinafter the Declarant along with Leo Wolowitz, has made application to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, for a change of zone for certain portions of the property from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District, to adjoin other "M" Light Multiple Residence property of the Declarant, all of which is more particularly described as follows: ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being near Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point located on the southeasterly portion of the premises being described herein, which point is the northeasterly corner of land of Schofield and McIntosh, and is the following two courses and dis- tances from a monument located on the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25): (1) North 11° 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; and (2) North 19° 16' 00" West 344.00 feet; running thence from said point of beginning along land of Schofield and McIntosh, South 65° 47' 10" West 213.37 feet to a point; thence through land of Brecknock Associates the following two courses and distances: (1) South 65° 47' 10" West 330.84 feet; and (2) South 66° 36' 40" West 765.20 feet to land of Jem Realty Corp.; running thence along said last mentioned land the following four courses and distances: (1) North 41° 39' 10" West 505.36 feet; (2) North 65° 07' 50" East 367.40 feet; (3) North 32° 28' 10" West 982.87 feet; (4) North 32° 57' 20" West 410.00 feet to the -1- ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound; thence along the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound seven courses and distances as follows: (1) North 44° 12' 35" East 564.01 feet; (2) North 25° 16' 36" East 398.13 feet; (3) North 58° 57' 15" East 601.09 feet; (4) North 42° 36' 45" East 169.85 feet; (5) North 57° 59' 35" East 188.68 feet; (6) North 41° 51' 15" East 322.22 feet; thence (7) North 31° 15' 06" East 483.73 feet to land of F. King; running thence along said last mentioned land the following 14 courses and distances: (1) South 30° 10' 40" East 910 feet; (2) South 31° 03' 40" East 300.01 feet; (3) South 28° 19' 30" East 89.61 feet; (4) South 13° 46' 30" East 33.68 feet; (5) South 27° 56' 50" West 65.47 feet; (6) South 0° 19' 40" East 179.94 feet; (7) South 1° 34' 00" East 300.20 feet; (8) South 3° 40' 00" East 100 feet; (9) South 0° 04' 20" West 172.71 feet; (10) South 5° 18' 40" East 100.93 feet; (11) South 0° 39' 30" East 100.15 feet; (12) South 1° 45' 00" East 434.17 feet; (13) South 7° 02' 00" East 40.19 feet; thence (14) South 76° 49' 10" West 155.10 feet; thence along land of F. King and land of Abadiotakis, South 24° 34' 30" East 805.00 feet to the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25); running thence along the northerly side of North Road South 66° 01' 20" West 634.76 feet to land of Schofield and McIntosh; running thence along said last mentioned land the following two courses and distances: (1) North 11° 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; thence (2) North 19° 16' 00" West 344.00 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 132.08 acres. WHEREAS, the Declarant desires to impose certain tions on the use of aforesaid premises as follows: NOW THEREFORE, it is declared that said premises subject to the following restrictions which shall run land: 1. The total described premises restric- shall be with the new dwelling units to be erected on the above~ shall not exceed three hundred fifty (350). Not included therein are any existing structures, clubhouses, or other accessory, storage or maintenance buildings. 2. Along portions of the easterly boundary of the above- -2- described premises where living units are located, there a 50 foot in width buffer zone in which no buildings or struc- tures will be erected. 3. Enforcement of these restrictions shall be through pro- ceeding at law or in equity. 4. These restrictions shall run with the land and may be altered, modified, terminated or annulled by the Declarant, its successors and assigns, only with the approval of the Southold Town Planning Board, its successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has duly executed this Declaration on the day and year first above written. shall b~ BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES By: Gus Schad, Partner STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On this day of , 1983, before me personally came GUS SCHAD, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and who, being duly sworn by me, did depos~ say that he is a member of the firm of BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES,I and a co-partnership, and that he executed the foregoing instrument in the firm name of BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, and that he had -3- authority to sign the same, and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of said firm for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Notary Public -4- PROPOSED DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS DECLARATION made this day of , 1983, by BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, a co-partnership, with offices c/o Gus Schad, 690 Deer Park Avenue, Dix Hills, New York, hereinafter called the Declarant. WHEREAS, the Declarant along with Leo Wolowitz, has made application to the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, for a change of zone for certain portions of the property from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District, to adjoin other "M" Ligh~ Multiple Residence property of the Declarant, all of which is more particularly described as follows: ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being near Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point located on the southeasterly portion of the premises being described herein, which point is the northeasterly corner of land of Schofield and McIntosh, and is the following two courses and dis- tances from a monument located on the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25): (1) North 11° 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; and (2) North 19° 16' 00" West 344.00 feet; running thence from said point of beginning along land of Schofield and McIntosh, South 65° 47' 10" West 213.37 feet to a point; thence through land of Brecknock Associates the following two courses and distances: (1) South 65° 47' 10" West 330.84 feet; and (2) South 66° 36' 40" West 765.20 feet to land of Jem Realty Corp.; running thence along said last mentioned land the following four courses and distances: (1) North 41° 39' 10" West 505.36 feet; (2) North 65° 07' 50" East 367.40 feet; (3) North 32° 28' 10" West 982.87 feet; (4) North 32° 57' 20" West 410.00 feet to the -1- ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound; thence along the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound seven courses and distances as follows: (1) North 44° 12' 35" East 564.01 feet; (2) North 25° 16' 36" East 398.13 feet; (3) North 58° 57' 15" East 601.09 feet; (4) North 42° 36' 45" East 169.85 feet; (5) North 57° 59' 35" East 188.68 feet; (6) North 41° 51' 15" East 322.22 feet; thence (7) North 31° 15' 06" East 483.73 feet to land of F. King; running thence along said last mentioned land the following 14 courses and distances: (1) South 30° 10' 40" East 910 feet; (2) South 31° 03' 40" East 300.01 feet; (3) South 28° 19' 30" East 89.61 feet; (4) South 13° 46' 30" East 33.68 feet; (5) South 27° 56' 50" West 65.47 feet; (6) South 0° 19' 40" East 179.94 feet; (7) South 1° 34' 00" East 300.20 feet; (8) South 3° 40' 00" East 100 feet; (9) South 0° 04' 20" West 172.71 feet; (10) South 5° 18' 40" East 100.93 feet; (11) South 0° 39' 30" East 100.15 feet; (12) South 1° 45' 00" East 434.17 feet; (13) South 7° 02' 00" East 40.19 feet; thence (14) South 76° 49' 10" West 155.10 feet; thence along land of F. King and land of Abadiotakis, South 24° 34' 30" East 805.00 feet to the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25); running thence along the northerly side of North Road South 66° 01' 20" West 634.76 feet to land of Schofield and McIntosh; running thence along said last mentioned land the following two courses and distances: (1) North 11° 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; thence (2) North 19° 16' 00" West 344.00 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 132.08 acres. WHEREAS, the Declarant desires to impose certain restric- tions on the use of aforesaid premises as follows: NOW THEREFORE, it is declared that said premises shall be subject to the following restrictions which shall run with the land: 1. The total new dwelling units to be erected on the above- described premises shall not exceed three hundred fifty (350). Not included therein are any existing structures, clubhouses, or other accessory, storage or maintenance buildings. 2. Along portions of the easterly boundary of the above- -2- described premises where a 50 foot in width buffer zone in which no tures will be erected. 3. Enforcement of these restrictions ceeding at law or in equity. living units are located, there shall buildings or struc- shall be through pro 4. These restrictions shall run with the land and may be altered, modified, terminated or annulled by the Declarant, its successors and assigns, only with the approval of the Southold Town Planning Board, its successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has duly executed this Declaration on the day and year first above written. BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES By: Gus Schad, Partner STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On this day of , 1983, before me personally came GUS SCHAD, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and who, being duly sworn by me, did depos. and say that he is a member of the firm of BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, a co-partnership, and that he executed the foregoing instrument in the firm name of BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, and that he had -3- authority to sign the same, and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of said firm for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Notary Public -4- PROPOSED AMENDED GRANT OF SCENIC EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE, made this by and between BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, offices c/o Gus Schad, 690 Deer Park York, hereinafter called the Grantor, SOUTHOLD, a municipal corporation having of business at 53095 Main Road, Southold, hereinafter called the Grantee. day of , 1983, a co-partnership, with Avenue, Dix Hills, New and THE TOWN OF its principal place New York, WHEREAS, there exists a Grant of Scenic Easement agreement covering portions of the Grantor's land, dated July 15, 1971, and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on December 13, 1971 in Liber 7066, page 386; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to modify the aforesaid Grant of Scenic Easement by cancelling same and placing in its stead the following Grant of Scenic Easement on other property of the Grantor, more particularly described in Schedule A herein; and WHEREAS, said premises constitute an area of natural scenic beauty and whose existing openness, natural con- dition, or present state of use, if retained, would enhance the present or potential value of abutting and surrounding properties and would maintain or enhance the conservation of natural or scenic resourses; and WHEREAS, the Grantor wishes to grant a scenic easement to the Grantee affecting the premises described in Schedule A; and WHEREAS, the Grantee deems it to be in the public interest to acquire interest or rights in real property for the preservation of open space and areas to preserve the beauty and natural conditions of lands in the Town of Southold; and WHEREAS, Section 247 of the General Municipal Law of the State of New York provides that municipalities, including Towns, may acquire the fee or any lesser interest, development right, easement, covenant or other contractual right necessary to achieve the aforementioned purposes to land within the Town; and WHEREAS, the Grantee in furtherance of the above policy and in accordance with Section 247 of the General Municipal Law, accepts the scenic easement affecting the premises described in Schedule A. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of ONE ($1.00) DOLLAR and other good and valuable consideration to the Grantor, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, this agreement wit- nesseth that: 1. The Grant of 15, 1971 and recorded Scenic Easement agreement dated July in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on December 13, 1971 in Liber 7066, page 386, is hereby terminated and cancelled. 2. The Grantor does hereby donate, grant, transfer and convey unto the Town of Southold, a scenic easement in gross, of the nature, character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over and upon all those certain -2- plots, pieces or parcels of land as set forth and described in Schedule A annexed hereto and made a part hereof. 3. The nature, character and extent of the easement hereby granted is as follows: (a) No buildings or structures shall be erected on the premises, except fencing, utility structures and out- buildings which might be required by municipal agencies for the construction and maintenance of communal utilities, water or sewage systems, consisting of a treatment plant, pumping and lift stations and collection system, and other such appurtenances. (b) No lumbering operations shall be conducted on the premises and no trees shall be cut unless dead, diseased or decayed or for the better landscaping of the area or improvement of existing growth or as may be reasonably required in the construction of roads, equestrian trails, recharge areas or communal utility, water or sewage systems; (c) The land shall remain essentially in its natural state, except for landscaping and maintenance such as mowing of grass, the cleaning and removing of debris from the pond areas. (d) No topsoil shall be removed from the premises nor shall sand, gravel or other minerals be excavated therefrom for purposes of sale or use off the premises; nor shall sand, gravel or other minerals be stored upon the premises; -3- (e) the right of assuring itself that of the terms time. 4. The The Grantee and its authorized agent shall have inspection of the premises for the purpose of violation of any and conditions of easement, at any the Grantor is not in this scenic nature, character and extent of limitations on the within grant of scenic easement are as follows: (a) The premises shall not be open or available to the public for general or park use, but shall remain at all times in the exclusive possession of the Grantor, its suc- cessors and assigns in interest, and subject to its or their unqualified right to exclude others therefrom by any and all lawful means, except as indicated in paragraph 3(e); (b) Roads with necessary recharge basins for road drainage may be constructed to provide access to and from surrounding properties of the Grantor, as well as the construction of jogging paths and equestrian trails. (c) The within grant of scenic easement shall in no way affect the right of the Grantor to use the premises, for the uses herein permitted, and to do all such things thereon, not expressly forbidden herein, as a similarly situated landowner might do; (d) All right, interests and privileges of the Grantor in the premises not herein specifically donated, granted, transferred and conveyed, remain and reside with the Grantor, its successors and assigns. -4- 5. The waiver or acquiescence in any variation from any part of the restrictions and covenants herein by the grantee shall be effective only for the particular instance involved and shall not be deemed to limit the continuing force and effect of the restrictions and covenants. 6. If the whole or any part of the premises shall be condemned or taken by eminent domain, then this easement shall forthwith cease without need of any further writing from the date of title vesting in such proceeding. In such event the Grantor shall not be required to repay to any real property taxing authority any taxes reduced or abated as a result of this scenic easement; nor shall the value of the premises be limited by this easement; nor shall any part of any award belong to the Grantee. 7. The grantee hereby undertakes to cooperate to the extent legally permissible in having the valuation placed upon the premises for purposes of real estate taxation taken into account and limited by the restrictions imposed by this scenic easement, all in accordance with State of New York General Municipal Law ~247. 8. This agreement shall be perpetual and shall be a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their -5- hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES By~ Gus Schad, Partner TOWN OF SOUTHOLD By William R. Pell III Supervisor STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On the day of , 1983, before me personally came GUS SCHAD, to me known to be the person who executed the foregoing instrument, and who, being duly sworn by me, did depose and say that he is a member of the firm of BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, a co-partnership, and that he executed the foregoing instrument in the firm name of BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES and that he had authority to sign the same, and he acknowledged to me that he executed the same as the act and deed of said firm for the uses and purposes therein men- tioned. Notary Public STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: On the day of , 1983, before me came WILLIAM R. PELL III, to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at 530 Anglers Road, Greenport, New York; that he is the Supervisor of the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, the municipal corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said municipal corporation; that the seal affixed is such seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Town Board and that he signed his name thereto by like order. Notary Public -6- SCHEDULE A ALL those certain plots, pieces and parcels of land, situate lying and being near Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows: PARCEL I: BEGINNING at a point located on the southeasterly portion of the premises being described herein, which point is the northeasterly corner of land of Schofield and McIntosh, and is the following two courses and dis- tances from a monument located on the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25): (1) North 11° 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; and (2) North 19° 16' 00" West 344.00 feet; running thence from said point of beginning along land of Schofield and McIntosh, South 65° 47' 10" West 213.37 feet to a point; thence through land of Brecknock Associates the following two courses and distances: (1) South 65° 47' 10" West 330.84 feet; and (2) South 66° 36' 40" West 765.20 feet to land of Jem Realty Corp.; running thence along said last mentioned land the following three courses and distances: (1) North 41° 39' 10" West 505.36 feet; (2) North 65° 07' 50" East 367.40 feet; (3) North 32° 28' 10" West 290.00 feet; running thence through land of Brecknock Associates the following six courses and distances: (1) North 57° 16' 01" East 652.01 feet; (2) North 2° 50' 30" East 411.75 feet; (3) North 82° 04' 52" East 267.15 feet; (4) South 10° 34' 40" East 472.04 feet; (5) North 88° 32' 59" East 360.75 feet; (6) South 23° 51' 43" East 1,123.11 feet to the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25); running thence along the northerly side of North Road South 66° 01' 20" West 252.76 feet to land of Schofield and McIntosh; running thence along said last mentioned land the following two courses and distances: (1) North 11° 31' 10" West 210.00 feet; thence (2) North 19° 16' 00" West 344.00 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 31.8212 acres. PARCEL II: BEGINNING at a point located at the northwesterly corner of the premises being described herein, which point is distant the following seven courses and distances from the point on the northerly side of North Road (State Route 25) where the southeasterly corner of land of Jem Realty Corp. joins the south- westerly corner of land of Brecknock Associates: (1) North 41° 39' 10" West 1,084.54 feet; (2) North 65° 07' 50" East 367.40 feet; (3) North 32° 28' 10" West 982.87 feet; (4) North 32° 57' 20" West 410.00 feet; (5) North 44° 12' 35" East 564.01 feet; (6) North 25° 16' 36" East 398.13 feet; (7) North 58° 57' 15" East 471.09 feet; running thence from said point of beginning along the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound the following two courses and distances: (1) North 58° 57' 15" East 130.00 feet; thence (2) North 42° 36' 45" East 169.85 feet to land of Brecknock Associates; running thence through said last mentioned land the following eight courses and distances: (1) South 29° 32' 27" East 250.54 feet; (2) South 3° 43' 35" West 234.96 feet; (3) South 35° 57' 18" East 163.60 feet; (4) South 3° 13' 04" West 277.09 feet; (5) South 57° 49' 51" West 255.05 feet; (6) North 31° 02' 45" West 300.00 feet; (7) North 5° 13' 27" East 382.02 feet; thence (8) North 38° 52' 02" West 183.71 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 6.1046 acres. No Transfer Tax Stantos Required TH~ [NDENT~ made Se 30th day of July , ~net~n hundr~ ~d eighty BETW~.EN GUS SCHAD, residing at 153 Seaman's Neck Road, Dix Hills, New York party of the first part, and a co-partnership, Woodbury, New York BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES, c/o Salvatore Gaglio, with offices at 800 Woodbury Road, Suite C, · -art~: of the second hart J V4111~l, that the party of Ten and 00/100 .......... .......................... ($10.00) ............................ dollars, lawful money of the United States, and other good and valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the .party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying andbeing~t4~ at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a granite monument set on the northerly line of the North Road at the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of H. Dwight Ripley, being the southeasterly corner of the premises herein described; running thence along said northerly line of North Road, South 66° 01' 20" West 634.76 feet to land now or formerly of SchofJeld and McIntosh; thence along said ]and now or formerly of Schofield and McIntosh, four courses and distances: (1) North 11© 31' West 210.00 feet; thence (2) North 19° 16' 00"%~st 344.00 feet;thence (3) South ! 47'!0"~st 213.37ft.:~nence (4)South t9°16'00"E.550.14 feet to said northerly line of North Road; thence along said northerly line of North Road two courses and distances: (1) South 65© 23' 50" West 285.49 feet; thence (2) South 66© 36' 40" West 589.52 feet to land now or formerly of Time Structures Inc.; thence along said land now or formerly of Time Structures Inc. four courses and distances: (1) North 41° 39' 10" West 1084.54 feet; thence (2) North 65° 07' 50" East 376.40 feet; thence (3) North 32© 28' 10" West 982.87 feet; thence (4) North 32° 57' 20" West 410 feet to the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound; thence along the ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound seven ceurses and distances: (1) Nerth 44° 12' 40" East 564 feet; thence (2) North 25° 16' 40" East 398.12 feet; thence (3) North 58° 57' 20" East 601.09 feet; thence (4) North 42° 36' 50" East ]~9.85 feet; thence (5) North 57© 59' 40" East 188.68 feet; thence (6) North 41© 51' 20" East 322.22 feet; thence (7) North 31° 15' 10" East 483.72 feet to land now or formerly of F. F. King Jr.; thence along said land now or formerly of F. F. King Jr. 14 courses and distances: (1) South 30° 10' 40" East 910 feet; thence (2) South 31~ 03' 40" East 300.01 feet; thence (3) South 28~ 19' 30" East 89.61 feet; thence (4) South 13° 46' 30" East 33.68 f~et; thence (5) South 27© 56' 50" West 65.47 feet; thence (6) South 0~ 19' 40" East 179.94 feet; thence (7) South 1© 34' 00" East 300.20 feet; thence (8) South 3° 40' 00" East 100 feet; thence (9) South 0~ 04' 20" West 172.71 feet; thence (10) South 5© 18' 40" East 100.93 feet; thence (11) South 0° 39' 30" East 100.15 feet; thence (12) South 1© 45' 00" East 434.17 feet; thence (13) South 7° 02' 00" East 40.19 feet; thence (14) South 76© 49' 10" ~lest 155.11 feet; thence along said land now or formerly of King and along said land now or formerly of Ripley, South 24© 34' 30" East 805 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE part of the same premises as conveyed to the party of the first part by deed dated April 10, ]969 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on April 14, 1969 in Libor 6533 at Page 476. This conveyance hereunder is subject to a certain moKtgage Jn the amount of $354,000.00 made by Gus Schad to William J. F~>i]ert and Adrian B. Van Riper which mortgage is dated April 10, 1969 and recorded on April 14, 1969 in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk in Libor 5585 Page 352. TOGETHER W£TH all the right, title and interest of the party of the first part, if any, in and to the waters and land under the waters of Long Island Sound adjoining the premises herein described. SUBJECT TO Grant of Scenic Easement between Gus Schad and The Town of Southold dated July 15, 1971 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office in Liber 7066 Page 386 on December 13, 1971. SUBJECT TO Declaration of Protective Restrictions by Gus Schad dated July 15, 1971 which is recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office in Libor 7066 Page 377 on December 13, 1971. SUBJECT TO Protective Covenants and Restrictions by Gus Schad dated July 15, 1971 which was recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office in Libor 7066 Page 382 on December 13, 1971. TOGEII-IER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof, TOGJg'I'itER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises, TO HAVE A~ND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. /~IJi~ 11c part) {~f thc first part covenants that the pnrty of the first part has not done or suffered anythi~ whereby the said prtnniscs have ~en incumbered in any way whatever, except as afore~id. /~JT~; t~,c l;:'tty ~,f thc first part, in compliance witfi Section 13 of the Lien I2w, ~venants that the party of the first pa~ will r<eive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to r~eive such consid- eration as a trust fund to he applied first for the put.se of paying the ~st of the improvement and will apply the same first to the pa~ent of the cost of the improvement before using any paa of t~ total of the ~e for any other pu~se. ~e word "pa~y" shall ~ o3nstrued as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this inclen*nrc m r~uires. I[~ 5','i'[i,J~Z-~j ~'.'i{2q~OF, iht~ paxty of tl~t. hr..t ~:i: t t~:~, (',i,]} cxccut~l this deed thc day and ymr first M~ve On the30th dray o{ July persor~lly c~me GUS SCHAD 19 8 O, before me On the day o[ personally ~,~. to me known to be fl~e individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he cxcc~ed the ~ Notary Public BARBARA DIACHUN l'lcl~ry Public. State of New York STA'r~ Of NEW YORI~ COUNTY OF On the day of I0 , l cfm~. mc personally came to me known, who, being by me doly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. ; that he is the o[ , the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrnment is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. 19 , before me to me known to be the individuM dcscritx~d in and wbo executed the foregoing in~trnment, and acknowledged that cxccuted the same. STATE OF HE~Pd YORK, COUnty OF ~l: personally c~e the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with whom I am ~rsonally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did.de~ and say that he resides at No. ; that he ~ows to be the individual de~H~d in and who executed the foregoing instrument; that he, said subscribing witness, w~s prc~cnt and saw execute the same; and that he, said witness, at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. WIIH (]OVi!NANI AGAtNSI GRANIOR'S ACIS T~Tt~ NO. GUS SCHAD TO BRECKNOCK ASSOCIATES SECTION BLOCK [.OT COUNTY OK TOWN TAX BILLING ADDRESS RETURN BY MAIl, TO: TITL~ GUARANT~E- NEWYORK ATICOR COMPANY Richard F. Lark, Esq. Main Road - P. O. Box 973 Cutchogue, New York 11935 Zip No. , t ),~ ::, ,-, JO """! '~ ' qOl'i3JT untt/UY the prcpo:'cr will usc- currcntl7 ovo[lo61c inforr;otion concerning prOjcct and the lihely impacts of the ac[ion. It is not expected that odditiono] studicr,, rc:;ccrch or other investigations will be undertaken. (b) ][ cay question has boca ons',~crcd Yes (ha projegt may be ~ignificon[ cod o completed Environmental Asscssmcn~ Form is. necessary, (c) If oll questions hove been answered l~o it is likely projccl i~ mol (~) Envi'r oam~:nt Gl 1. ¥Ii1~ p:'ojec/ result in o large phyzico! change to ihe project ~i[o or p~y5icol]y o!~er more tn~:n 10 acres of lone!? ........................ X 2. Ui!i Ihere Lc o mn jot chan.qe to any ~nique · u:,u3u,~! / ~ [oi r ~c:~c m ,curia on the site? .......... 3 ¥til1 p,o~c: ~ or hc,/c o large oTFoct on exis+~n~,, bo(~7 of wol ~ Ui~- ,~' ,"",:~. ., ~. ~ ..~: n ,n°i'=nhi°t!f large impact 5 ~','ill projecl significcaity cfr'ecl drainage fl cd.' ' it s~ g ¥/ill project off ecl on)' threatened or eadaa~ercd plant or animel species? ........... 7 ¥/ii1 project rcsu]t in 0 major adverse lit ? ' aa air ctua )' . .............................. 8 Will prnjec{ he:ye o major effect on visual chcracfer of ibc communiiy or scenic views or visto_n known ia'be Jmporion{ tO ~1 ~ ~,~ communi(f? Y. Will project adversely impact any site or 5i:'uciure of historic, prehistoric Or p~leonio!oglcol impo~ lance or any dcsiDnatcd os o ci'i~ic~:i environmental oreo b)' O lOCal Oo(,]Cv9 ............ -.~ . .-vv. v...%"~ . · v lO. ~'~ill project [~avc o inc~or el ,cci on existin0 or future recre, otiono] opportunit!cs? ......... 11 %,'il! project result in major traffic problems o~l cou~e o mo jar effect to existing I p t i i ..... t ? ~ c-, i ~ co~;s objectionable odo~s, noise, glare, vibroJion, or electrical disturbo:]ce os a resull o~ the project's operation') . .' ......... 13. ¥Ii11 project J,ave on)' impact om public health 14. ~'/Jl! p/ojecL (~[[cct ~hc: e>:isiin0 comnlur~it~ b~ --' cji: ect]>' causing o growth in permanent populolion o[ more then 5 percent over o one Feet period .%E have o rno)o~ ncgolivc effect on ins c[~arc, cier o[ the communlly or neiOhuo,l~ood. 15. }s [here public cea[rovers)' co~cerning ibc ' ' ........ :. ............................. ~//. ,/,1~, i ~-,'/I,[? ,, , /his Yes X No Yes X, No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X Yes X Yes X No Yes X No Yes X lqo Y e s ~< 1'4 o Yes X No DAlE Dece~ber '~q, l~:- 1--.7 b~ ~I. ~hat ce:'t~in plot, pie~e or ~el of 1~, ~tulte, iyi~ ~d be~r~ ne~ G~e~t, T~ of Zouthold, Co~ty ~est ~.00 feet to a ~on~nt; three ~)' ~0" Ee~t ~';.8~ feet tO ~e~d poin~ Of ~zmi~ 'h.nc~ fr~ said point of ~i~ ;n~ five ~') ,~eurees ~ d. et~ee ~o~ other I~ of (f') O'S" ~t ~;'.0~ feet: ("~ ~ortn ~' ~0' feet tc land of K~r~ thence alo~ i~ of ~" Ees: ',73.9~ f,~t; (~] Sous~ 22* 49' ~"~m~ ~9.~ feet; (~)'South ~' ~' ~' ~mt ~.~ feet; (5) 8eu~ ~?e' ~:6' C" 'mes~ ~.~7 fee~; (6) ~uth 0e fi~:').c~a feet' ("~ South ~e ~, ~' ~t ~.~ (a) So~,::', ~* ~; .~." ~a: ~.~ feet; (9) O~' ~" ~St ~ '~..fl feet; (~0) ~u~ 5' ~8' ~' ~t ~C~3./~ feet; ('q) South 0e ~0' ~" ~mt ~.~ feet; (12) South ~e 4' ' ~" ~et ~.~0 feet; (~) West ~CV.?6 feet tc the point or pl~o of ~- p~ B -- L~dsha~.u[~er Zone ~L thet .:*~%8tn plot, p~ece or pS~ll of t,ow o:~ levelly of H. D~t ~pley, sou.hecate..2 co.er of the-p~ai~m he~ feed to o~ntr l~d ~ .tho of ~o~h' ROad ~e fo!iowi~ ' I law o~ in eqult2, invalidation of ~ ~v~aion ~e~in ~1~ ~ no ~.ffect ~.pon ~' other R~wla~on ~e~ln. ~reto ~nd m~ade a ~ he.of! ~ ' ~CHEi~LF A c~ ~to the ~ of ~old. a ~e~e eaee~nt in ~sa, of ~ ~, c~c~er and ~o the e~en~ he~i~f~er set forth. ~r ~d ~o~ 'all that ee~a~ plot, piece or panel ~f land ~s · et fo~h ~ described ~n ~ch~ule A a~exed he~o ~n~ ~de ~of. (a) ~o ~ld~ or at~ of a~ deec~ption ~1~ ~e e~cte~ on ~oes, except ones req~ ~01~ 0~ ~pa~nt Of Health ~,na/or the Suffolk ~b) ~o~rl~ oper~tiona ~h:.~l be conducted on ~1 or ot~ ~terl~ ~ eto~d up~ t~ p~mieee~ II~ lteelf ~t the ~o~ is not ~ ~ol.~ion of ~l ~l a~ o~d~$tone Of thi~ .oenic e~ement, ~t m~v time. m~ be dedicsted to m~cipml torCh.th cea~ ~'~out not be req~d to eas~ent; nor ~all ~e v~ue of Grantor s,r.~,l~ OF ~ 1'o~i ss. %0 ~ ~ to be the ~ivi~u:,: ~e fo~i~ ~t~nt. and ack- executed the ~e. ,~c~,~ ~ ~l,~ ;' ~ ~ ~'' ~. MA~<'~A. to ~ ~n, wh~. ,':'.~ by =~ duly swo~, did Ne~ Yo~ I ~% ~ il the Su~.r', .~ Of th(~) O~ I~O~'"{~{OLDi the ~n~©tpal co~por~tio- cut~ the ~o~go~ ~. ~! '~:~d tha~ he ~d his Plannin? 8 ~rs -4- August 3, 1981 On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Mul!en, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency in the matter of the major subdivision of Hillcrest Estates located at Orient under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. An initial determination of non-significance has been made. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Orlowski, Latham, Hullen On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED to set 7:45 p.m., Monday August 31, 1981, at the Town Hall, Hain Road, Seuthe!d, New York, as the time and place for a public hearing en the question ef the approval ef the minor sub- division ef Harie Cassid~ located at Arshamomaque. Vote of the Board: Ayes: R=~.o=,~n ~ Or.o ~,_,] '~"~ Latham, Mullen On motion made by Mr. Orlowski, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED to grant a ninety (90) day extension in regard to Golden View Estates co~mmencing from July 20, 198!. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Orlowski, Latham, Mullen recknock ~!.!. ~r. Raynor stated that between now and the meet~ 12, on Fishers Island, he would like all the i } - I or Auoust .... _ n~u~ that kthe b~ard may have in regar~ to condominium proposals. / / MarGaret McGowan. This is ZBA action. The board feels that there is inadequate ' ~ -- ~' ' ~ =~ '~.. regard to this matter. Patricia Bailey. This is ZBA action. This ~erop=~Y+ should be reprocessod as a new subdivision. There is an undersized lot that the board feels should bo brought up to an ac~.~ Planning Board -8- Hay 11, 1981 {%.3Lanzer p~ope:ty. The BoarO had peen requested by Mr. John Hutter to make an insnection of the property and cave its oe~n~on an tn whether they wouldZfavLrably on a change of zone in this location to multiple. It was the consensus of the board, with Mr. Raynor dissenting, that it would not look favorably on such a change of zone. ~ minor subdivision. Mr. John Strong, present owner of the ~roperty, requested information as te whether he could change the right-of-way from its present 50 feet to 25 feet At a ~revious .~' \meeting, Mr. Latham was asked to make an inspection of the property and report back to the board. Mr. Latham reported that he had met with Assessors' Clerk Sherwood, reviewed the maps in the assessors' office and made a physical inspection of the property. It was his opinion that here was no need for the right-of-way to be 50 feet in width as this was excessive because there would be no need for this to become a town road for access to the ' ~ · nt~_~o~ lots of Gillispie, if it were 25 feet it would preclude it from being a town road and there appeared to be a problem of ownership and the possibility of it being lost for taxes and being takei~ over by the County. Az discussion, it was the consensus ef the board, with [.ir. Latham in dl~ag==eme.~n, that the right-el-way remain at the 50 foot width. Mr. Raynor announced that he had spoken to Mr. Kontokosta and he had indicaLed that he would be abandoning his plans te construct a marina at his Shipyard Lane, East Harden, preperny. He will proceed with plans for 48 condominiums. Mr. Raynor called a .... ~ ~s~=al meeting ef the Planning Board : p.m., Tuesday, June 2, 1981 at the Tow~ Hall. Mr. Gus Schad / be in attendance to discuss his proposed complex at Brecknock / will ......... - ' Mr. Raynor thinks~ ~4~. Hullen fou writing a letteu to the Town Board regarding indemnification of the Plannin! Board members. Mr. Raynor announced that the Planning Board would be going to Fishers Island on Hay 19th at 10 a.m. te make inspections of various p~p~r~zes over there. On motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board bond ~otim~t~ prepared bv. Lawrence M. Tuthill, Town Engin~,' ' ,''?' in the amount of $100,000 for the subdivision to be known as "Harbor Liqhts, Section Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Orlowski, Latham, Mullen The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has indicated its agreement with the lead agency designation. It wilt be necessary for a test '+Tell and test hole te be installed on the property. The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations. Further information can be obtained by contacting Ms. Muriel Tolman, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Orlowski, Wall, Latham, Mutlen Schad Brecknec>{' Hall Condominiums. Hz'. Raynor reported that the original sketc~ in~--i9~~rcular clustering of approximately 30 bullo%ngs. Thor_ ar~ mor~ than 20 dwelllng units so more than ~ne~e acc?ss wzi1 have to be provided. The street circulation is poorly deszgned. It lacks toop type circulation. There are no drainage faczl~tles. There is an excessive oYerall block length. There-are ne east side ef the property connecticns. There are no elevations en the buildings to determine the separation between the buildings. Te comply they lack the 100 foot setback from Long Island Sound. Mr. Nayner feels the entire project should be reconsidered. Where it is se badly designed, Hr. Rayner feels the Board should go back and look at the total planned concept development. He would like to see expanded use ef the Sound frontage areas and the density be cut by half or two-thirds. This information will be relayed to Mr. Schad. L~nze~ property. John Hurter has requested that the Planning Board review this property for a reconunendation on whether he should proceed to request a change of zone from the Town Board. Mr. Latham will inspect the property and make a report at the next meeting. Mehlman minor subdivision. John Strong has requested information on ute possibility of making the right-of-way in this minor subdivision 25 feet wide instead of 50 feet. He would also like specifications for completion of the right-of-way. Mr. Latham will make an inspection of this property and report back to the board at the next meeting. Herbert Davids has made application to the Zeninc Board ef Appeals.~~ te divide merged property in the subdivision ef ~eaweod Acres. Section one. He weuld like three lets each ef which is under 13,000 square feet in area. The property is exceedingly small. The William F. Hullen, Jr. TELEPHONE 765 - 19gS A regular meeting ef the Seuthe!d Town Planning Beard was held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, February ll, 1981, at the Town Hall, Hain Ro~o, Southold, New York. Present were: Chairman Henry E. Raynor, Jr. Member Bennett Or!owski, Jr. Member William F. Hu!!en, Jr. Ruth Oliva, North Fork Environmental Council Golden View Estates. Howard Young appeared at the meeting. Due to oslec=ion of area proeerty owners it was decided that Eagles Nest Court will end at the east boundary line and not make an angle to the. south. Thc area which was intended to be a road will be held out as 'reserved for future dedication to the Town of Southold'. It is not" the intention of the Planning Board that a turnaround be built at this location. Cove Beach Estates. Richard Cron, Esq., and Howard Young appeared at the meeting. The recommendations and con-dnents of Lawrence M. Tuthill, Town Engineer, were reviewed by the board anO Messrs. Cron and Young. A copy of this report will be forwarded te Hr. Cron. Natural drainage areas without fencing were discussed and suggestion was made that the town could be indemnified in this regard. ~ ' Hail_ Condom±niums. Richard Lark, Esq., Howard Young and Gus Scha~ appeared before the board. The proposal is for 385 units. t T~. pro]cc} ylll be developed in sections. Discussion has been he~ w!=.u the Vzl~age ef Greenpert Utility Superintendent and it is likely that both s~ewer and water will be available from the village. This will~l~c~e~e the number of units allowed. Mr. Lark stated there is a pooszb~l~ty a change of zone will be sought for the nine acres by] the Sounc w~hlch is zoned residential with no increase in the density overall. They are also looking to reduce the size of the buffer on / e eas~ from 100 feet to 50 feet. / -8- On motion made by P~. Or!owski, seconded by Mm. Latham, it was RESOL~ZED that the following conditions of the Suffolk County Pleskning Co;mr~ission be placed on the final map of the subdivision "Honevsuck!e Hills" as the Commission has deemed them necessary to help preserve the natural and aesthetic attributes of Long Island Sound. 1. No major nonresidential structures, such as, swimming pools, garages, etc., shall be permitted to be constructed or located within 50 feet of the top edge of the bluff. 2. No grading shall be permitted within 50 feet of the top edge of the bluff except that that may be necessary to control or remedy erosion or to divert stormwater from flowing over the edge of the bluff. 3. Clearing and cutting of vegetation, particularly under- gro~h, within ~0 feet of the top ed~ of tn~ bluff shall be limited to that necessary for maintenance. 4. No s~nitary disposal facilities shall be constructed or located within 100 feet of the top edge of the bluff. 5. No stormwater r~off resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision or any of its lots shall be discharged directly over the top edge of the bluff or do~.~ the face of its slope in any marmer. 6. Access to the beach at the toe of the bluff shall be restricted to a com~munity access structure. Said access struot~uPe shall be designed and constructed in a manner that will result in the least distumbance to the stability of the bluff. ?. No residential structure shall be erected withiN. 100 feet of the top of the bluff. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Gordon, Latham, 0Plowski Schad Breckuock Hall proeerty. Richard Lark, attorney for N ~,~e~ a e~esubmission c~n£erence for himself and }.~. Young regarding thi~ property zonea multiple, residential and business. The meeting will be scheduled for February llth. ~ There being no further business to come before the board, },P. Gordon made.a motion, seconded by Hr. Latham ~ad carried to adjourn the meeving. Heeting adjourned at 11:05 p.m. Respec%fu!!y submitted, M~riel Toiman, Secretary Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman -6- acco::~odate some of that ~atv~ off Indian Neck Lane and that is an -mp~ovem~n~ to eliminate a bad situation in case of flash rains. .......... ~. ~';e want to follow this up. ['P. Lark: The engineer deliberately fixed that road to accommodate. He can't take all of it but he can take some of Indian Neck's excess water. ~'~. ~'lickham: There is not a great deal of lineal distance but I mnderstand a great deal of water originates far to the north and west and comes dov~ here and this is not entirely his fault but we have to look at it and say what can be done to alleviate the situation. ~. Raynor: Does anyone else have some information to bring before this board? Hearing none, has any board member anything else? We will declare this hearing closed. Se~ Breeze Village - Kontokosta Associates condominium units. EmmanueZ Kontokosta, George Wetmore and Richard Lark, Esq. appeared. , The following letter was presented to the board. G entl emen: Attached is two copies of the proposed Condominimm Site P~ Scheme B dated May 25, 1978 which I received May ~0, 1978. In reviewing the site plan I see it complys to the Zoning Code of the Tov~ of Southold. One suggestion, a wider road to the easterly parking area be made so cars may pass. /s/ George H. Fisher Senior Building Inspector ~h~. Kontokosta presented an amended plan showing the right-of-way at 20 foot width. There was a question of a 100 foot setback from the bluff. The building inspector has to go by a 50 foot rear yard according to the Code but Mr. Wickham says the Planning Board can require a 100 foot setback. PP. Kontokosta, at the Board's request, put the approximate top of-the bluff in red ink on one of the plans. A field inspection of the property will be made in the near future. · ~-. ~_ ~ · . ~ '~ d-,.. ~ i - · ' .~ hatthere would be access in approximately the areas requested ((~. Lark. S~hrl~ver and Charles Schriever cluster subdivision. William ~ '~ Cuddy, Esq., appeared. },P. Schriever is negotiating an exchange of eroeerty in the area of the recharge and it was his contention that S~pt. of Highways Dean and the Tovm. Beard had agreed in principle. He requested approval of the sketch map with the condition that the tov~ approve the exchange of property which amounts to the sump area and the tovzn approve the up-zoning for the area that is lots 7, 8 and 9. pP. Schriever changed the wording on the map from 'preliminary' to 'sketch'. Richmond Creek Farms. Arthur DiPietro, Esq., and Pat Frank Nesci, Esq., appeared. The following comments were made by Mm. Raynor. Meadow area is being used for park and playground. The names Cove Court and Cove Drive are confusing. Lots 37 to ~3 are in the flood plain. Lot 1~ is a f!ag!ot. There is no recharge basin. The access to Lot 2 should be restricted to an interior road. Block from Main Road to Creek Lane is in excess of 1200 feet. Check out highway specifications with regard to 12 inch corrusated steel pipe. ?,P. Raynor thinks it should be 18 inches. A dwelling on the property is not reflected on the map. ~@. Gordon asked if any consideration had been given to developing this property in the cluster concept. There was further discussion on this and the gentlemen will get back to the board. There was also something said about the possibility of swale drainage and getting reco~mmendations from the Soil & Water Conservation District. On motion made by Mr. Wick~ham, seconded by Mr. Gordon, it was RESOLVED to grant two extensions of 90 days each for the time to submit the final map of the subdivision known as "C~ntennia! Manor~ Section One" as requested by the attorney for the applicant. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Wic!~am, Raynor, Gordon, Wall Richard Foster. Mr. Foster explained to the board that he would ~ike Zo sell'one piece of property which is located on Bridge Lane, Cutchogue, out of approximately 10 acres. He wants to keep the back and is willing to put covenants on this property that it could never be divided into more than three lots. If it is divided into residential lots, even though he does not inten~ to sell them, the taxes will go up substantially- ~. Wiclaham said the Planning Board ca~ot allow him to sell a piece tmti! there is sketch plan approval. This matter will be referred to the Tovm Attorney for his opinion. Sou~home Town Planning Board 3 - July 16, 1973 Lefferts P. Edson, Esq., came before the Board in regard to a proposed minor subdivision for Clement W. Booth off North Lane, Southold. The map shows four lots on the approximately four acres. The map shows another lot owned by Mr. Booth, but it is not contigious to the minor subdivision. Mr. Wickham told Mr. Edson the boundary of the subdivision must be marked in heavy lines and the map must show the names of the property owners across the streets. Mr. Peter Warren came before the Board and said that the owner and real estate agent for Laurel Country Estates has been telling people buying lots there that they have the right to use the beach (between tile Sealy and Arthur homes). Mr. Warren submitted a copy of a letter sent to neighbors from the Boulevard Residents Association dated July 15, 1973, and a copy of the Planning Board minutes of March 24, 1970, of the public hearing for Laurel Country Estates. In the minutes the at%orney for Laurel Country Estates stated they would not deed out any beach rights winh the lots. Mr. Warren said he would like the Board to write a letter to the developer. Mr. Wickham received the following telegram over the telephone in regard to this matter from Dr. and Mrs. Philip Ziring: "At the March 24 1970 meeting of the Southotd Town Planning Board the map of the Laurel Country Estates Subdivision was approved without beach rights. In the last few weeks many of these Laurel Country Estates residents have chosen to defy this decision thus creating a health hazard and potentially dangerous confrontation with members of the Boulevard Residents Association who have deeded beach rights. As members of the Boulevard Residents Association we request the Town of Southold use whatever means it thin, ks necessary to enforce the March 24 1970 decision." Mr. Wickham told Mr. Warren the Board will ~oom~ ' into the matter and take the necessary action. Mr. Gus Schad and Dick ~ ,~- , . ma~, Esq. appeared before the Board in regard to the site plan for condominiums for Brecknok Hall. Mr. Schad presented a new site plan for the ouzlazngs. Mr. Schad said he had found out that the Zoning Ordinance only allows four units per building and his plan is for ezght units. The new s~e plan shows the buildings clustered and the parking area would be dropped down. Mr. Moisa told him there ma be problem with drainage. Mr. Lark said - y a under this plan he can't oulld. He can't have more than four Southoid Town Planning Board - 4 - July 16, 19~ u/nits under any given roof. The concept will have to be~, / re-thought. With the 145 acres he could have multiple '-, / residences on 30 acres and flle for a suoslvzsmon, on 70 acreo w~th a clus ~e~ . The a~vant~ge is ~o have the scenic easement and open space on the residential. Mr. Wickham said if the Ordinance says no more than four units we have no right to vary that at all. There are some ways of doing it; you could in some way divide tile units. Hr. Wickham said the multiple residence plan and cluster plan will have to be handled separately. Hr. Wickham said in this particular case he would have no objection to him going to the Board of Appeals. The Planning Board is meeting with the Board of Appeals and would be glad to talk to them about it. We would give a letter of recommendation. Mr. Schad said this new plan is much differmnC. There is no trouble with spacing and the density is the same. Mr. Lark said they plan to tie in tile roads, sewage, water and drainage with the "A" cluster concept. Mr. Schad said they would be individual homes but under condominium ownership. }Ir. Lark said by clustering they would save money on building and preserve open space. With condominium ownership then can share in the open space. Mr. Schad said there are 57 acres with the condominium area and about 30 buildable acres; the residential area is about 74 acA-es - ~z=~. clustering about 36 acres would be left open in the "A" zone. Mr. Schad left the new site plan map and 2.ir. Wickha:a said he would discuss it with the Board of Appeals and Town Board. Robert Tooker, Esq. and Jim Reeve came before the Board in regard to Little Neck Properties Subdivision. Mr. Tooker said the nitrate level had dropped and they have approval of the County Health Department. Because of tile new amendment to the Zoning Ordinance changing the frontage to 150 feet their map does not now comply. Ail the lots are over 40,000 square feet and three lots do not have the required 150 feet frontage. Mr. Wickham told them the Town Attorney has said the Planning Board has no authority to approve anything that does not comply with the Ordinance. Mr. Tooker asked if the Board could recom~end to tile Board of Appeals to grant relief. He said they have another alternative and that is to revise the map. lie presented a sketch plan of a cluster development witil ii lots, each having 40,000 square feet and approximately 140 feet frontage. The open space would be about 25%. This would satisfy the Health Department's requirements. They would Southold Town Planning Board - 6 May 1, 1973 Mr. Gus Sch~c, Rzchard L~rk, Es~., anc M~. Nowa~d Young appeared before the Board in regard to the site ~_an for Brecknok Hall at Greenuort. Thi~ plan is for ~e parcei'zon~d,M-! for condom~nz~ms. The condominiums are one and two sedroom units and ~he buildings are combined one and two shories. Mr. Sc~e said they have problem with the distance between buildings. He submitted a layout of the buildings. Mr. Schad also said the County Department of Environmental Control has told him the sewage treatment plant must be built and in operation after the first 50 dwelling units are built. The first 50 units must have dry sewage lines. Mr. Lark said the · ' A ~ ~o~ ney prospectus on the condominiums zs filed wLth the ~ ~ General. Mr. Schad said the sewage treatment plant will be enclosed and will be in the scenic easemen~ area. Mr. Schad also presented drawings of the style of buildings u~ ~s in he intends to build. He said they have four ~ center with upstairs and downstairs and two units in eaoh e,~e of the bu~e~g. The Board told Hr. Sc~d he will have to go to the Board of Appeals on any variance in distance between buildings. Mr. Schad said they would ask for 25 feet between some of the buildings as a minimum distance. 56 buildings are shown on the layout. The Board told Hr. Schad to figure the avezage height of the buildings and have all the ouz~ezngs n~ can w~h tile required distance and then go to the Board of Appeals.. The Board also told Mr. Schad that all buildings along the Sound must be set back 100 feet. Nr. Schad asked about the proposed east-west road. He had planned having a private entrance to the property and they would be private roads. The Bo~e told Mr. Schad the road would not be required to go through this M-1 district, but a road would ~',be required in the ' ~ ~ Reszeen=~l District 1000 feet back from '~he biuff. The Board will require dead end roads connecting uN to the scenic easement. Mr. Schad said they would work on'he layout and submit it to the Board. The Planning Board discussed with Richard Lark, Esq., the proposed change of zone for Leisure Greens, Inc. from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" LiGht Business District, property situated at Hain Road, Cutchogue. Mr. Wickham said the Board was told some things by Leisure Greens, Inc.~ that were not true. They said they talked to trades people in the Town but actually had not. Mr. Wickham said it was not a good plan to have the Sacred Heart School playground by the parking lot. The application must be forwarded to the Suffolk County Planning Co~nission. The Board asked Mr. Lark for a disclnsure statement and Mr. Lark said all interested parties were the following: Mr. John Grodski, President; Mr. Martin G. Ahem; Mr. Hans Ketlson; PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS John Wlckharn, Chairman Southo!d Tov,, n Planning Boa'rd SDUTHDLD, L. I., N. Y. 11971 MINUTES SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Special Meeting June 29, 1971 A special meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board was held at 8:30 A.M., Tuesday, June 29, 1971, at the Town O~< ~ ~c~, Main Road, Southold, New York. ~nere were present: Messrs: John Wickham, Chairman; Henry Moisa, Vice-Chairman; Henry Raynor. Absent: Messrs: Frank Coyie & Alfred Grebe. Also present: Howard Terry, Building Inspector The Planning Board inspected the revised maps of the proposed change of zone application of Gus Schad (property located at norsh side of Route 25, Greenport, N. Yo) Subject maps containing the amended enlarged scenic easement area and amended "M" Multiple Residence k, District. ./ Southold Town Planning Board -2 June 29, 1971 n motion by Mr. Wickham, seconded by Mr. Moisa, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board favorably reco?~,end to the Soutnold- Town Board the amended petition of Gus Schad for change of zone from "A" Residential and Agri- cultural District to "M" Multiple Residence District on PARCEL A and from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-2" Business District on P~RCBL B on property located at north side of Route 25, Greenport, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: W1c~n~m, Moisa, Raynor~ The Planning Board reviewed again the proposed "Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance "and the proposed "New Zoning Map". On motion by Mr. Moisa, seconded by Mr. Wickham, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Southold Town Board final approval of the proposed Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and final approval of the proposed Ne~ Zoning Map as referred to them by the Soutkoid Town Board at their regular meeting held on June 22, 1971. The Planning Board hereb~l submits the following con-~,enns and would like to see the following changes made on the proposed "Zoning Map": 1. New Suffolk The old Raydel Oysher Company, Jackson Street. The Planning Board reco~ends be a "C" ~ndustrial District. south of that tllis 2. New Suffolk - The Planning Board recommends that the section on the west side of Old Harbor Road, from Lundines south to the Creek, be residential. This would save a lot of criticism. 3. Mattituck Tile greenhouse property at the sout!~ side o~ New Suffolk Road, east of the A & P store. ~is property is not owned by John Wickham. The Planning Board recozsnends that this be "B-i" business. This property has been in eperanion as business for over 60 years and should continue to be so. It has been assessed and taxed as business and is sho}~n on the current zoning map, dated October 27, 1970, as "S" Business. It is unrealistic that this property be residential, Consider- ing the taxes that have been paid on this propersy as business OVer the years. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Wickham, Moisa, Raynor. ~,,e ur,~.rm~n read notice received .,o,,, the Coomerative ~.,.~= ....on Association of S~.o~., ~~ t~ new county re~rd movies .n~w available on the subject of plaz~nl.~j; and solid waste dis-- ~¢ ~ and notice of summer sc,,ool to be held on how to interpret ~ne oo~ maps for specific ' ,,.. .The Chairman read the determlnatio:~ received from the Suffolk · ~oun~y PIanning Commission o~ proposed change of zone petition of ,, ~.~ Scn~do The ~ ~' ' ~ ~ -l~n.n~ Commission co~.sidered it a matter for loc~ determination and o, fe. ed several comments on it. On motion by Mr. Grebe, seconded by Mr~ Wickham, it was RESOLVED that the Southo!d To~ a~ .... ~ Board hereby r~-~a~e~ tae~r recommendation of approval to the Southoid Town Board of change of zone petition of Gus Schad:, property located at north side of Rou~ 2~,, Gree'azort "= ~..~ .. ~ ~'~w York, for ~,i~.l.}~ Of zone ~o~ '~mI~ c~a ~ . Re .... ~n~.al and ~gricultural District to ";,I" ~;ultipie Residence Dis'c;%ct on Parcel I, and from "A" ,,~o~den~ial and Agricultural D~e~. to "B-2" Business D.st,~ct on Parcel Ii, as originally stated in ....... ~ ~ .~o. menm~ion of December 20, 1970. The Planning Board further .... .~co,.m~ .... that this P~.~on for c.an~e of zone be set up for a public ' ==-~ n .... no at the next meeting of the Town Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes' .-~uessrs  e ~ ~o~etaer with a copy of the Co~.,~y reco,,...~nd~on. The above .~co-,menda~io,. to be sent to the Town Board The Chairman read letter .... .ecc~ved ~.om Eugene A. O!iva in reference to dredging operation and ~ ~ -~,~ ~e~y formatio~ ~ ,,aJor's Pond, Orient, New York. Letter to be sent to ~,r. Ollva stating that the matter is in the zrocess of being investigated, at the present time we hav~ no confirmed formation on it. The minutes of the Village of Greenport Planning Board, dated January 25, 1971, were read by the Chairman and the following !eVter was sent to the To;,m Board: Southold Town ~g Board -54 ~'~ · December 28, 1970 which appears reasonable to the Planning Board showing finger piers on the east side of the island and a minimum 50 ft. roadway and 100 ft. turn-around. We strongly recommend the proposed location of the gas dock be changed to either the north or south xt=emztv of the meadow island. - Vote of the Board: Ayes:-Messrs: Wickham, Moisa, Raynor, Coyle. t The Planning Board was presented with copy of letter which William Wickham, Esq. a/c Richard Babcock and Fred Rimler, sent to Supervisor Martocchia in regard to the drainage on the lower end of Babcock's property, adjoining the proposed !'West Hill Road" in the proposed subdivision "Calves Neck", owned by George Ahlers. This is a matter which must be resolved between the two property owners. The Chairman dictated a letter to be sent to George Ahlers advising him to resolve the matter with Mr. Babcock and his attorney, copies to be sent to all concerned. The Planning Board ,,,~as presented ~ith final maps for the proposed minor subdivision of John H., & Margaret H. Guest, Fishers Island, New York. Formal application and fee have been received., On motion by Mr. Wickham, seconded by Mr. Coyle, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval to the proposed minor subdivision mad of John H.& Margaret H. Guest, lsners Island, New York. The nalrman signed the maps. C~ · Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs: -i v~ - W-c~.nam, Moisa, Raynor, Coyle. The Planning Board received from the Town Board the original petition of Gus Schad, 5 Arista Drive Di× Hills, New York relative to change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Multiple Residence District on PARCEL A, and from "A" Residentiel and Agricultural District n certain real property,\ to -- Business  o together with the District on PARCEL B on instructions to prepare Southold Town P_~n~'~ ,g Board n official report defining the conditions contained This property is situated at Greenport, in the To~n of Sou~, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and more particularly bounded and described as follows: PARCEL A - BEGINNING at a point on the northerly side of North Road where it is intersected with the division of land of Gus Schad and the southwesterly corner of land now or formerly of Ripley; running thence along the northerly side of North Road South 66© 01' 20" West 525.00 feet to a point; thence running the following five courses and distances along other land of Gus Schad as follows: (1) North 22© 21' 30" West, 488.29 feet; (2)-North 11°41' 20" East, 771.04 feet; (3) North 24© 34' 30" West, 1304.59 feet; (4) North 37° 54' 10" East, 465.41 feet; thence (5) North 30© 10' 40" West, 600.00 feet to the ordinarly high water line of the Long Island Sound; thence along Long Island Sound, North 31° 15' 10" East, 400. 00 feet to lands now or formerly of King; thence running the following fifteen (15) courses and distances partly along lands now or formerly of King and partly along lands now or formerly of Ripley: (1) South 30© 10' 40" East, 910.00 feet; (2) South 31© 03' 40" East, 300.01 feet; (3) South 28© 19' 30" East, 89.6t[feet; (4) South 13© 46' 30" East, 33.68 feet; (5) 27© 56' 50" West, 65.47 feet; (6) South 0° 19' 40" East, 179.94 feet; (7) South 1© 34' 00" East, 100.93 feet; (11) South 0© 39' 30" East, 100.15 feet; (12) South 1° 45' 00" East, ~ 434.17 feet; (13) South 7° 02' 00" East, 40.19 feet; (14) South 76© 49' 10" West, 155.11 feet; (15) South 24° 34' 30" East, 805.00 feet to the northerly side of North Road and the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing an area of 38.282 acres. PARCEL B - BEGINNING at a point cn the northerly side of North Road on the division line between the southwesterly corner of parcel herein cescribed and the southeasterly corner of land now or form- erly of Time Structures, Inc.; running thence North 41© 39' 10" West along lands no%~ or formerly of Time Structures, Inc., 579.18 feet to a point; thence along land of Gus Schad, the following two (2) courses and distances: (I) North 66° 36' 40" East, 765.20 feet; thence (2) North 65© 47' 10" East, 330.84 feet to lands of Schofield and McIntosh; thence south 19© 16' 00" East along lands of Schofield and McIntosh 550.14 feet to the northerly side of North Road; thence along the northerly side of North Road the following two courses and distances: (1) South 65° 23' 50" West, 285.49 feet to a point; thence (2) South 66© 36' 40" West, 589.52 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing an area of 12o436 acres. A lengthly discussion was had on this proposed change of zone. On motion by Mr. Raynor, seconded by Mr. Ccyle, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board favorably recommend to the Southold Town Board the change from "A" Residential December ~u~no~u To~n g Board - 28, 1970 and Agricultural District to "bi" Multiple Residence on PARCEL A, and from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-2" Business District on PARCEL B on the above described proposed change of zone. It is the opinion of the Planning Board that this is a very comprehensive plan, well wo_r. ed out. There has been a need for additional apartment dwellings in this area of the Town for quite some time, this project will fulfill the urgent need. The light business area will be needed to round out this development and for the surrounding residential area. Various forms of recreation such as golf, boating, and fishing will be cont- ained in the development for the residents use. The Planning Board and the developer have been working on this plan for some 8 months and it is our feeling that with the low density requirements of the proposed new amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, which the developer will have to meet, this development will be outstandingly beneficial to the Town of Southold. Vote of the Board: Ayes:-Messrs: Wickham, Moisa, Raynor, Coyie. In reference to the text of the application and the scenic easement contract pertaining to the above proposed change of zone, the Planning Board made the following suggestions: Petition, page 2,~ 3., 1st paragraph - balanced mix, ?ne Board suggests that a different phrase or word could be substituted to define the ratio of the one and two bedroom units more clearly. Grant of Scenic Easement, Exhibit 3, page 2, ~ 2(a) - Area of land necessary for operation of sewerage plant should be stated, i.e. area of land necessary for operation of sewerage plant not to exceed ~ number of acres, or it could be described on a percentage basis. Grant of Scenic Easement, be clearly stated that this condition shall cever only such part the preperty that the condemnation or eminent domain proceedings cover. E~n_bmt 3, page 3, ~ 5. - It should of to Richard Lark, list of the above suggestions to be sent Attornev~ representing Gus Schad. "Leeward Acres" was briefly discussed, the Chairman stated that Southoid Tc~,~n P~n" 7 Board -1~ October 26~ 1970 map to be meeting° drawn up as such and presented at next Planning Board Richard Lark: Esq. brought up for discussion the proposed division of property owned by George Ro Clary~ property located at north side of Sterling Road: west side of Horton Road: and south side of Lilac Lane~ Nassau Farms~ Cutchogue~ New York° [~r. Lark presented the Board with survey of the property and stated ~at this is the only lot in the area which is owned by ~ Claryo Possible division lines for this lot were discussed by Mro Lark and the Board° The Board advised hL~ to have pre- liminary maps made up and presented at the next meeting° An informal discussion of the proposed change of zone application of Gus Schad~ property located at north side of Route 25~ Greenport~ Ne~ York~ was held by the Planning Board: Dick Lark~ and Gus Schado Mro Schad has finalized the district boundary lines and is ready to present the application to the Town Board° ~ne Planning Board informed him that the public '~,hearing required on the scenic easement can be held at the same time t~e hearing is held for the change of zone° ~e Planning Board was presented with final maps and formal application for tb.e minor subdivision of Theodore Dowd~ property tccated at S/S Soundview Avenue and E/S Lighthouse Road~ Sout~old: New York~ ~ne map was revised as previously requested by the Planning Board° Arnold Larsen to present Board with 3rd copy of final map and filing fee of $60° On motion by Mr° Wickham¢ seconded by Mr. Moisa~ it was RESOLP~D that the Southo!d Town Planning Board grant final approval to the minor subdivision of Theodore Dowd~ Southold: New York, subject to receipt of 3rd copy of final map and filing fee of $60o Vote of the Bcard: Ayes:-Messrs: Wickham~ Moisa: Ra~amz! Grebe° Henry Raynor was opposed to the approval of this minor subdivisior On motion by ~o Raynor~ seconded by Mr° Grebe~ it was RESOLVED that ~he minutes of the Southold Town Planning Board dated September 29, 1970, be approved as submitted° Vote of %he Board: Ayes:-Messrs: Wickham~ Moisa~ Raynor~ Grebe° Southoid Town ~ -9 Board -71 ~ 2tember 1, 1970 Richard Lark, Esq~ appeared before the Planning Board to request approval of division of property for George Ro Clary, lot located at north side Sterling Road, west side of Horton Road, and south side of Lilac Lane, Nassau Point, Cutchogue. ~ae lot has 100 fro frontage on Sterling Road, 362o5ft. frontage on Horton Road, and ll8afto on Lilac Lane, it contains approxi- mately 37,000 Sqo ft. of area. Mr. Clary is requesting permission to divide this lot in half. The lot to the west has been sold to R. Reibe, it is no longer owned by Claryo ~le Board discussed this proposed division at some length, no action taken at this time, to be discussed again at the next meeting. ~ne Chairman read the report of the Agricultural Study submitted by Dr. Joseph Sullivan° The Chairman informed the Board that the Commoners of the Town of Southold are ready to enter into scenic easement and negative easement contracts° Tl%e Chairman has received several contracts which he will present to tlne Town Board at their next meeting on Sept° 8th. Final information meeting on Master Plan to be held sometime at the end of the month or early October. The Chairman suggested that information be sent to the newspapers to inform the public and brief them on the material. The Chairman also suggested that some sort of fly folder or information sheet be printed to hand out to the people at the meeting~ amended accor dingly~ Richard Lark~ Esqo and Gus Schad appeared before the Planning Board for an informal discussion on proposed change of zone application of Gus Schad, property located at north side of Route 25~ Greenport~ N~Y. ~e proposed density will be 7 units ~e=e ~ acre~ there will be 29 apartment buildings~ containing a total of 350 units° There is still some discretion on how the 150 ft. strip off the road should be zoned. The Board suggested that a scenic easement be placed on ito P~o Schad was a little hesitant about placing a scenic easement on it~ Decision to be made by Mro Schad and application to be Board July 27, 1970 last meeting by %~hich they approved the minor subdivision of Fishers Island Development Corpo~ subject to the condition that no raw sewerag~ shall enter into the area. They decided that this condition was adequ in light of the Health Depto findings° The Planning Board was presented with revised map: formal application, and fee for minor subdivision of Jonathan Do Stern~ property located at north side Main Road~ Orient, New York. The map showed 5 lots as recommended by the Board at the last meeting° On motion by ~,ko Coyle~ seconded by Mro Ralrnor~ it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval to the minor subdivision of Jonathan Do Stern, located at north side Main Road, Orient; New York° Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Wickham: Ralrnor, Coyleo Leu~=~ received from the Superintendent of Highways stating that he approves of the road lay-out of the proposed subdivision map of" Laurel%good Estates" as shown on map dated July 9~ 1970o Richard Lark, Esqo and Gus Shad appeared before the Planning Board for an informal discussion on proposed change of zone applicatioz of Gus Shad, property located N/S Route 25~ Greenport, N~Yo A lengthl discussion was held on the zone district boundaries° The Board made several suggestions and recommendations as to the location of the proposed zones~ Further action was wi~h held on the matter until Shad finalizes the zone district boundaries° On motion by }Lro Wickham~ seconded by Mr° Raynor; it was RESOL~q~D that the minutes of the Southold Town Planning Board dated July 13~ 1970, be approved as submitted° Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Wickham~ Raynor, Coyle. The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 PoHo Respectfully submitted, /~ ~' ~"l Southold Town Planning Board Southoid .... Board -3 Nay 27, 1970 it is now necessary for our engineers VoLe of the Board: Ayes:-Messrs: Coyle, Grebe. to make several inspections. Wickham~ Moisa~ Raynor, ~ne Board was presented with a preliminary plan for proposed minor subdivision of C~W. Booth~ property located at Soundview Avenue and Horton:s Lane~ Southold~ NoYo ~ne map showed 5 lots~ all containing over 40~000 Sqo ft. of area. On motion by M_ro Moisa~ seconded by ~Varo Wickham~ it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant preliminary approval to the proposed minor subdivision map of CoWo Booth, property located at Soundview Avenue and Hortons Lane~ Southold~ N. Yo Vote of the Board: Ayes:-Messrs: Wickham, Moisa~ Raynor~ Coy!e~ Grebe. Richard Lark~ Esqo appeared before the Planning Board in reference to proposed minor subdivision of Richard B~bcock~ property located at Calves Neck~Road~ Southold~ NoYo Mr° Lark presented the Board with formal app!i~-tion and 3 copies of final map~ On motion by Mr° Ray~or~ seconded by Mr. Meisa~ it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval to the proposed minor subdivision of Richard Babcock~ property located at Calves Neck Road~ Southold~ NoY~ Vote of the Board: Ayes:-Messrs: Wickham~ Moisa~ Ccyle: Grebe° Ra!rnor ~ }iro Lark informed the Board that he will present change zone application for Gus Shad~ iRoute 23, Greenport; New York, on June 9~ 1970. On motion by ~ko Moisa, property located at north side of to the Tov~n Board at their meeting / seconded by ~Vkro Wickham~ it was RESOLVED that the minutes of the Southold Town Planning Board Southotd Town Board -2- March Il, 1970 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval to the minor subdivision of Tydfil Kent Schelin {formerly Jennie Lester}~ property located at north side of Westphalia Road, Mattituck, New York° Chairman signed final maps° Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Wickham~ Moisa: Raynoro Richard Lark~ Esqo presented the Planning Board with a preliminary plan for proposed minor subdivision of Richard Babcock, property located at west side of Calves Neck Road~ Southold, N.Y. (formerly Judge Bo Hill property]° The map showed a parcel of land of approximately 4 acres~ divided into 3 lots~ A: B~ & C~ all lots contained considerably over 20:000sq. feet of area° ~. Lark requested the Board:s opinion of the division as presented~ and asked the Board for any other possible suggestions for the divisicn of this property that they might have° There is an existing house~ barn, and cottage on this property which poses a problem° the Board disapproved of the division as presented because one of the loss contained 2~ acres. They suggested that this parcel be divided into 4 lots~ so as to prevent any future problems with re-division that might arise if it were only 3 lots~ Map to be revised~ as outlined by the Board: and presented at the next meeting° Richard Lark~ Esqo appeared before the Board in reference to property of Mary Zeneski, lock-ted at east side of Little Neck Road, Cutchogue~ NoYo He requested permission to re-- locate the 50ft. right-of-way~ now running between lots 6 & 7, at the southwesterly end of the property~ ~e Board suggested pushing lot 7 northerly~ so that it wilt be adjacent to lot 6~ and re-locating the right-of-way at the south end of lot 7 (adjacent to land of Kujawski)o ~le right-of-way as re-located must run the entire length of the property to ~he easterly pro~rty line and should be designated as "reserved for possible future dedication for highway purposes°" Map to be amended and presented at the next meeting~ Richard Lark~ Esqo presented to the Bcard~ for their ln~pec~lo~,. an artists rendering of a plan for possible future development of the Brecknock Hall property, owned by Gus Shad~ located at the north side of Route 25~ Greenport~ New York° The parcel contains approximat 17 145 acres of land, all of wUich is zoned "A" Residential and Southoid To~n Board March iR, 1970 Agricultural° The plan would call for zone changes from Residential to light business~ apartments, and building lotso There are water mains for public water on the North Road directly in front of the property and it would be possible to connect to public sewerage° The Board discussed the lay~out of the plan at some length with Lark, and offered some suggestions for revisions° Plan to be revised and presented at a later date. ~o Lark requested the Board to make an inquiry to the NoY~S~ Depto of Transportation in reference to any plans they may have for the widening or improvement of Route 25 in this area. The Planning Board was presented with a bond estimate in the amount of $23t000o~ prepared by Larry Tuthill--construction Engineer~ for the completion of roads and other improvements in the subdivision to be kno~ma as ~Shipule Properties"~ located at east side of North Road to Bayview, Southoid, New York. On motion by ~o Wickham; seconded by ~o Raynor, it was RESOL%~D that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Southotd Town Board a performance bond in the amount of $23,000° as prepared by Lawrence Tuthill~Construction Engineer~ for the completion of roads and other improvements in the subdivision to be known as "Shipule Properties"~ located at east side of North Road to Bayview~ Southold~ New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: wickham, Moisa, Raynor. ~. Robert Douglass appeared before the Planning Board informally to check on the length of time in which he has to complete the roads in his subdivision 'willow Terrace"~ Sec. I~ located off south side of t~ng Street~ Orient~ NoY. He informed us that Van Tuyl is going to start surveying the roads and he just wanted to make sure that his approval was still good. The Board informed Mr. Douglass that he has 3 years~ from the date of approval~June 9~ 1969, in ~ich to complete the roads in his subdivision. Mr. Douglass inquired about the test holes which he had made on June 6~ 1969. The chairman suggested that he take the map to the County Board of Health and ask them to consider the original test holes. The Planning Board was presented with a revised map for division of property owned by Henry John Pavlak~ Grand Avenue, Mattituck, NoYo The map showed 2 lots~ the easterly lot with a frontage of 100ft.~ and the westerly lct with a frontage of r.d~ dN L3 I O IV~ TOWN OF .GOUTMOI O STRUCTURE NUMBER ES D-7 MH E-ii CB E-13 CB E-14 CE E-15 ES E-18 MH E-19 MH E-20 CB E-21 CB E-22 CB E-23 CB E-24 OS E-25 SHEET N~ 4 SHEET SHEET N~ ! KEY MAP, SCALE'/'=600' MATCH L/NE EXIST/AId SEE S HEE T ,3 ./ F-22 ' " MANHOLE T 25.75 (Nk) 21.40, (SW, NW) 19.91 CATCH BASIN TC 26.35 (SW,NW) 21.73 CATCH BASIN TC 26.35 (SE) 21.85 CATCH BASIN TC 24.65 (SE,W) 20.02 CATCH BASIN TC 24.65 (E) 20.15 LAWN INLET T 25.10 (SW,NE) 21.10 LAWN INLET T 26.40 (SW) 22.40 END SECTION . -- (N) 17.50 MANHOLE T 27.25 (N,S,W) 19.99 MANHOLE T 26.00 (W) 20.62, (E,SW) 20.46 CATCH BASIN TC 25.25 (NE,NW) 20.63 CATCH BASIN TC 25.25 (SE) 20.75 CATCH BASIN TC 25.57 (N,E) 20.94 CATCH BASIN TC 25.57 (S) 21.07 OVERFLOW T 27.17 (S) 24.25 DRAINA GE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE ' ' TYPE ' CASTING INVERT(S) ' - ELEVATION ELEVATION(S) ..... " ~ Z~. o '~ " ES F-1 END SECTION -- (E) 21.50 NH F-2 MANHOLE T 28.50 (W,E) 22.69 CB F-3 CATCH BASIN TC 28.00 (W,E) 23.37 CB F-4 CATCH ~J%$IN TC 28.00 (W) 23.50 ES F-5 END SECTION -- (NE) 21.50 MH F-6 MANHOLE T 31.85 (NE) 24.76, (SW,SE) 23.88, MH F-7 MANHOLE T 31.30 (NW,E) 24.20, (S) 24.76 CB F-8 CATCH BASIN TC 30.00 (N,E) 25.37 CB F-9 CATCH BASI~ TC 30.00 (W) 25.50 LI F-10 LAWN INLET T 29.00 (W) 25.00 LI F-11 LAWN INLET 'T 31.30 (SW,NW) 27.50 LI F-12 LAWN INLET T 37.80 ' (SE) 32.70 MH F-13 MANHOLE T 33.50 (N,S) 28.57, NW 29.17 CH F-14 CATCH BASIN TC 33.35 (S) 28.85 CB F-15 CATCH BASIN TC 34.35 (N,SE) 29.72 CB F-16 CATCH BASIN TC 34.35 (S) 29.85 ES F-17 END SECTION -- (W) 21.50 MH F-18 MANHOLE T 27.00 (E,NW) 23.00 MH F-19 MANHOLE ; T 29.75 (SE,NW) 24.19, (NE) 25.30 CB F-20 CATCH BASIN TC 28.92 (SE,NW) 24.29 CB F-21 CATCH BASIN TC 28.92 (SE) 24.42 CB F-22 MANHOLE T 31.90 (SW,NW) 26.69 MH F"23 MANHOLE T 31.40 (NW,NE,SE) 27.40 Li F'2~1 LAWN INLET T 31.85 (SE) 27.85 LI F-2~ LAWN INLET T 33.85 (SW) 29.85 r.C ~-26 LEVEL CONTROL T 25.00 (SW) 22.50 DW F-27 TYPE 1 D'WELL T 26.50 (NE) 22.25 (N) 27.85 -... / J C THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NEE YORK Steven J. Hyman, P.E. Consulting Engineer 31 CARDINAL LANE HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 (516) 361-5346 /"= 50' Jo r : NOV. 1985 J"eoJ. NO.: 85-26 SITE PLAN/GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHEET ~ OF; ~'~ , % ..~ THE ~?~~5 ~ 1SLEDS ~D ~: ~ ~":~~:~'~'~'~' ~ ~R~fiNP~T, TOWN of 50UTHOLO ~m~ ~ " 5UFFOL~ COUNTY, N~N YORK I...ZlA/D DE.B/~N L_Zl~t~p~ Atir_.NI~C-/'5 / L~NO pI_,4NN~5 f ] II . , .. ~ . . .-. ~,~. x : " ~me~ .- ~ ,~~~. ...~ 6Uff~OL~ COUNTY , N~N YOB~ O~T I ~//~:~M~T ~ ~/~/~ ~__ " '\ f-AND L2~I~N ~¢i41T£CrO J E o~° m - '~TI~IASTI..I?-E. 5 /NE. / / \ ~ , // // // %, QI~.~A/POIW", TO/Wi'v' ole 50MTt4OLO 5UFFOL/'( ~5)LINTY , Ntff_/.,,,I YOFF, OI~INE? ~ 5U~L~IVIDEF .' 7'/-l~ I. QOLO b. I I IZ O/v-O,~N I ZA TION t -!- ¸ ,TI4~_ //d~/..~/,,41TZ O~ZlNIZA T/ON ~C~L~ /#= CoO0~ ~C/~L~: 1#=50c0'''' f I ,AA WALTER E. BLUM I! plqnJ. NO. OWLS. NC:]. /,IDA -% " IREV: DATE: I ] PROJ. NO. DWG.oFNO" [ " RECEIVED B"/s $O0')'HOLD TOW~ PL~ING ~ MIDDLE (MAIN ROAD) (COUNTY ROAD 48) PARCEL "A " 1,062, P$0 24.1559 Ac. (COUNTY ROAD 27) 388.91' (NORTH ROAD) ROAD 98,5. I0' N. 71° pS' pO#E I PARCEL /, 070,065 2~565~, ,4c. 670. 00' S. 74° 45'00"p/ BENNET ROAD J IWASHINGTOAI AVE. VILLAGE OF ,KEY MAP' MAP OF PROPERTY SI TUA TE AT GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK sealond [surveying & engineeri.ng p.c. 0 west mo~n street riverheod, new york 11901 (516) 369 -1717 Oct. 9~ 1986 Job N~ 86-1470 1000-40-05-01 Scale: I"= 60' NO, DWI]. NO, / OF :, f i ./ / , // -/ JO8 NAME: .-/-?,~/ ~.A K Z RES/DENT/AL ZONE BUS/NESS ZONE TYPICAL LIGHTING FOR SHOPPING MALL AREA / / 76 §~ 20' ? / / / J \ \ _M ~ ' MII~IIA/I AIM '~U ~ L ~ -- --/TYPICAL (zo' x , ') ! S 85°47*IO*'W I I I / ~$o. 84' / / / / / / / // / E~ t'T / × / / / / / / PHASE/ O E VEL O~MENT I I / / (~) / / / [] / / (ooo / / / / lb / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / i/i///I I// / / / / / / \, X I / / / / / / / \\\ \ \ X. / ,~.~ // //~o~// '~ / / ~-/ ,/, ,,, ~ ~ / / X \ \ \ \ / / / / l I I I / / / / / / A $Pd/IL 7- PA~'~M~rJT ~ I I I / 06010,47-60 7'0 TYPICAL LIGH?7NG FOR PARKING AREA '\\ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / .9 / / / I I / / / \ J/o LOCATION MAP MAIN ROAD 1. THE OWNER AKD D~ELOPER OF T~E PROPERTY IS T~E WOLOWZTZ 3. THE AREA OF T~IS PARCEL IS 12,436 ACRES. 4. ALL SURVEy DATA IS I~ THE U.S.C. & G. DATUM AND ~LAS BEEN 5. T~E PROPERTY IS ZONED AS "L/G~T BUSINESS". 6. ALL DRAINAGE, PARKING A~D CONSTRUCTION S~ALL CONFOPOH, TO THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TOW~ OF SOUTHOLD. 7. ALL BORIZONTAL DISTANCES BET~EN BUILDINGS SHALL BE AT LEAST (N YS. RTE. 25) RETAIL FLOOR SPACE = 13910 SF RESTAURANT SEATING = 100 UCC BAR SEATANG = 35 UCC REQUIRED FOR RETAIL REQUIRED FOR RESTAUP~ANT ................... 13910 SF = I39 STALLS ~00 SF/S TALL 100 0CC 20 STALLS 5 0CC/STALL REQUIRED FOR BAR ........................... 35 UCC 7 STALLS 5 OCC/STALL TOTAL REQUIRED ........................................ = 166 STALLS TOTAL PROVIDED ........................................ = 176 STALLS DATE REVISION · I0 -Sa TOWN OF $OUTHOLD STIRLING, SOALE: BREAKERS VIL L A GE SUFFOLK COUNTY~ NEW YORK ~'~O~I~H ~]. HI~Hf#H J]~'~JH~,~ (516) 737-3378 consulting engineers 3505 Veterans Memorial Hwy., Suite M / Ronkonkoma, N. ~ 11779 I" = :20' PROJ. NO.: DATE: R.MA 1988 SHEET 87-08 i OF1 SKETCH SITE PLAN SHEE~ ~ 2 ~ ~ - - / -. : D~S~Ip~0N ~ PROPOSED' EXI ST~NG . GR0~D CONTOUR ........ ~ 2~ ~Z~~ ~. ~. R.C.R. ND S~CTION .... < · -=. AT THE SOUT~ST CORN~ ZONED AS BusI~SS 2. / / ,/ m~ ~ ~~ - +z+~ ST4.Ri+-83 '" :'" ! ....'.7 / :..': / · ..: ~ / -. :' ~ i '' ,.. .~' " / / ',''; ~.~o / "' ~ " I / ... -_ · ,, . ,: / . .. , ST'~['~URE TYPE ~% ~STING I~ERT(S} ' STRUCTURE TYPE CASTING I~ERT(S) ~E~ EL~ATION ELEVATION(S) ~QU~D P~G. 2 :~PACES X 350 ~ITS = 700 S~AC~. . . ,~ ES A-1 ~ND SECTION -- (E) 11.50 MH B-15 ~NHO~ T 24.00 (NE) 19.201 (N,S) 18.31'- ~ E-2 ~NHOLE T'24.50 (NE) 18.36, (~,S) ~8.31 SPA~S PRODDED FOR THE RECR~TION:B~LDING. ' MH A-2 ~NHO~ T 18.50 (N) 13.49, (W, SE) 12.61, (E)l~.71 LI B-16 ~ IN~ET T 23.25 · (SW) 19.25 ~ E-3 ~NHOLE T 25.75 (N,SE) 19.04, (SW) 21.46 ~ A-3 'CATCH ~IN -TC 1~.~2 (W,E) 'i2.79 ~ MH B-17 ~OLE T 27.00 (N~) 21.66, (N,S) 19.65 CB E-4 CAT~ BASIN TC'26.40 (~,SW) 21.77 ' ~ ~ - ~ ~ CB A~4 CATCH B~SIN TC 17.42 (W) 12.92 CB B-18 CATCH BASIN TC 26.42 (N,SW) 21.81 CB E-5 CATCH BASIN TC 26.40 (NE) 21.90 ~ ~ ~2 - F~- A-5 - ~NHOLE T 20.00 (~,E) 13.67 CB B-19 .~TCH BASIN TC 26.42 (S) 21.92 .CB E-6 CATCH BASIN TC 24.05 (~,SE) 19.43 ~ C~CU~TE MINIMUM CLE~CE BE~N PRINCIP~ BUilDINGS ' ~.,~/ ~ E~u~$TRIMN ~M~ CB A-6 CATCH BASIN TC 19.71 (W,NE) 15.08 .OS B-20 bVERFLOW T 23.17 ' '' (S), 20.25 ' CB 'E-7 ~TCH BASIN TC 24.0~ (~) 19.55' .. : - ~LO~T~O~z* ,~ ~ CB A-7 CATCH BASIN TC 19.71 (SW) 15.21 LC B-21 LEVEL CONTROL T 19.00 (E) 16.50 ~ E-8 ~HOLE T 23.75 (SW,~) 18.75, (~) 19.75, (~) 19.2~ ' ~ -' '~ ~ : ~ A-8 ~NHOLE T 19.75 (S,E) 14.53, (NE) 15.75 DW B-22 TYPE 1 D'~L T 22.-00 (W) 16.25 ~ CB E-9 CATC~ BASIN- TC 23.44 (SE,~) 18.81 FROM C~R 100-5~ OF ~O~ ZONING CODE, T~ ~NI~M DIST~CE ~,~j~%.,.k:;.. ~ ~ CB A-9 CATC~ BASIN TC 19.30 (W,SE) 14.67 CB E-10 CATC~ ~ASIN TC 23.44 '. :(SE) 18.94 ~' BE~EN PRINCIP~ BUILDINGS S~L BE ~O (2) T~S T~E ~IG~ OF" SUFFOLK C0. PDNNING DEPT ~ . CB A-12 CATCH BASIN ' TC 21.80. (~} 1~.30 C~ C-3 ' CATCH BASIN TC 23'.25 (~) L8-.75 T~ST BUDDING ~IG~T IS 23'-2", T~R~EFO~-T~ ~N~M ~.R~CE ES B-1 END SECTION / -- (E) ~.50 ~ ; - ES C-6 END'SE~TION -- (~) -1~50 ES G-10 END SECTION ' MR C-7 ~0~E T 17.50 (NE) 13~50, (SE,~)13.06 , ~ G-il ~N~0LE ' T 23.00 (~-,SE)~'~.39, (NE)15.45 %h~: UO~ ' ~ Ba2 ~NHOLE T 21.00 (W,E)lS.66, [N) 16.43 CB C-8 CATCU BASIN TS 17.82 · (SE,~) 13.19 ~ G-12 O~RFLOW T 17.17 (~, Z,.2S THE cs ~-4 ~ca ~ASZN ~C 22.7~ (SW,E) 'la.09 C~ C-E0 CATC~ ~ASZN TC 24.00 (SW,~) [9.37 -. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~e refe~al of this proposed Subd~wzs~on ~. CB B-5 C~ BASIN TC 22.72 (W) 18.22 . CB C-11 ~ATCH BASIN ~: TC 24.00 ~ (SE) 1~.50 ~ ~ ES I-1 END SECTI6N (E) 8.50 ' /~ ~ ~,~-6 ~N~LE T 23.00 (W,N) 17~9, ,(NE) 17.53 "' E~C-~2 END SECTION (W) 11.50 ~ 'I-2 ~NEOLE T 13.75 (N,~) 9.75, (WrSE) 9.22 ~tted to the Suffo~ Cowry Pl~nnia~ Co~{ss~o[ '~ ~: ' ; '~ I~T 'T 25.90 (S) ~1.90 ~ ' r , ,.: t,. Consulting Engineer (6~6) 361-~ ' ,- ' CB I~5 ~TCH B~IN: TC 18.18 (W,E) 13.55 : , : with ad~t/onal info~tion. ~ B=I'0 -~NHOLE T 25.50 (~,E)-18.78 ~ ~ ~S D-1 E~ SECTION -- (.NE) 9~5D CB I-6 ~TCH.BASIN TC 18.18 (W) 13.68 \ SHEET N~ 4 \ ~~ =ET N~ I KEY MAPL MA TCH L I NE SEE SHEET ,,oo · . , Esl ,? ,24 CB I;'20 .~ 50 1.,. ~-22 ' ' STRUCTURE NUMBER FILE SUFFOLK CO. PLANNING DEPT SUB, D REVIEW SECTION The referral of this proposed subdivision plat has been found to be incomplete. The pro- posed subd/vision pl.at will have to be resub- Please refer to letter for details. ES D-7 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE 'CASTING ~LEVATION INVERT(S) ELEVATION(S) MH E-ii CB E-12 CB E-13 CB.~-14 CB LI ES E-18 MH E-19 MH E-20 CB E-2i CB E-22 CB B-23 OS E-25 MH F-2 CB F-3 CB F-4 ES F-5 MB F-6 MB F-7 CB F-8 CB F-9 MH F-13 CB F-14 CB F-15 CB F-16 ES F-17 END SECTION -- (S) 11.00 MANHOLE T 25.75 (Nk) 21.40, (SW, NW) 19.91 CATCH BASIN TC 26.35 (SW,NW) 21.73 CATCH BASIN TC 26.35 ($E)~21.85 CATCH BASIN TC 24~.65 (SE,W) 20.02 CATCH BASIN TC 24.65 (E) 20.15 LAWN INLET T 25.10 (SW,NE) 21.t0 LAWN INLET T 26.40 (SW)~ 22.40 END SECTION -- (N) 17~50 MANHOLE 'T 27.25 (N,S,W) 19.99 MANHOLE T 26.00 (W) 20.62, (E,SW) 20.46 CATCH BASIN TC 25.25 (NE,NW) 20.63 CATCH BASIN TC 25.25 (SE} 20.75 CATCH BASIN TC 25.57 (N,E) 20.94 CATCH BASIN TC 25.57 (S) 21.07 OVERFLOW T 27.17 (S) 24.25 END SECTION MANHOLE CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN END SECTION MANHOLE MANHOLE CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN LAWN INLET LAWN INLET LAWN INLET MANHOLE CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN END SECTION T 28.50 TC 28.00 TC 28.00 T 31.85 T 31.30 TC 30.00 TC 30.00 T 29.00 -T 31.30 T 37.80 T 33.50 TC 33.35 TC 34.35 (E) 21.50 (W,E) 22.69 (W,E) 23.37 (W) 23.50 (NE) 21.50 (NE) 24.76, (SW,SE) 23.88, (NWiE) 24.20, (S). 24.76 (N,E) 25.37 OW) 25.50 (W) 25.00 (SW,tgW) 27.50 ~ (SE) 32.70 (N,S) 28.57, NW 29.17 (Sl 28.85 (N,SE) 29.72 (S) 29.85 (W) 21.50 (N) 27.85 · E- 17 CB PAT/./ ..~_~. .~/~,,.4_/~ .9,7,4/_/_ F-F L~ THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END?' ..... DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE :STRUCTURE ~TYPE CASTING ~- '.~ £N¥~T (S) & ~MW~ ELEVATION %~ - ELEVATION(S} · ~ ' '% ~ C-13 ~Lk T 29.00 (W) 23.92, (N) 21.88, (E,~) 21.40 / ~ ~% ' CB C-14 CATCH BASIN TC 28.93 (E,S) 24.31 ~ C-15 CATCH BAS~ TE ~8.93 (N) 24.43 "~ C-16 ~NHOLE T 3~.50 (SE,W) 22.25, (~) 26.87 CB C-17 CATC~ B~IN TC ~1.62 (sE) 27.12 ~ ~o~B C-18 CATCH BASIN TC 30.00 (E,N,)-95.37 SHEET N~4 %o -c~ C-19 C~9H BASIN TC'30.00 (S) 25.50 .~.3 ~ ~ ~ C~21 ~NHOLE T 32.00 (W) 25.78, (N~) 24.~2 ' ~ N CB C~2~ CATCH BASIN TC ~0.90 (E,SW}-~6.28: ' ' (NE) 26.40 h / ~_ CB 0-24 CATCH BASIN TC 30.90 SHEET N~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c-25 ~OLE T 33.25 (~,W) !2~.25~ (SE,SW) 28.38 '~,?k ~' ~ C-26 ~LE T 34.40 (N,SW) 30.01 ~ ~-. , C~~ c-27 CAT~BASIN 'TC 36.22 (S~) 31.59 -'' SHEEr N2/ <' ~'% ~ CB C-28 CA~H~BASIN &TC 36.22 (SE) ~1.72 ~ ~ "~_ '., ~ CB C-29 ~TdH BASIN TC 33.07 (NE,S}:~28.44 ~ k ~ CB C-30 CATCH BASIN TC 33.07 (N) 28~57 ~ '~ 'kk CB C-31 CA~CH ~ASIN ~C 36.33 .--~ , ~W+= ' "x. k '% ~ ~ %~%~ CB 'C-32 CATCH BASIN TC 36.33 (~) 3~.83 ~= ~ C--33~ ~OLE T 29.75 (W) 25.30, (~,N) 22.69~ ,~ ~: ~ ~ ,. i ~ C-34 ~NHOLE T 32.50 (N,S), 23,25. /~/' % '% ~' ~ ~ C-35 ~NHOLE T 32.20 (S,N)~24.21 KEY MAP . % x, ~ c-36 ~OLE T 32.25 (S,~1~25.03, (W) 27.26 S~AL~:/'%~O' ~ ~ ~ CB C-37 CATCH BASIN TC 31.96 (E,SW~%27.33 · ~ ~ CB C-38 ~T~ ~S~ TC 31.96 (NE) ~2~.46 ~ ~ C-39, ~NHOLE ~T 33.75 (SE,~) 25<64, (N) 29.~5 // ldo ~, ) k CB C-40 ~T~ BASIN ,. TC 34.40 t (SC,")' 25.78 t~ ,~ ~ ~ CB C-4~ CA~ BASIN . ~C'34.40 - (~,~) 25.90 " '~ ' ~ C-42 ~OLg T 42..25 (S,NE) j31.71 ~ q~, / ~ CB C-43 ~TC~ BASIN n~./~ ~, ~-I ~ C-45 ~HOLE T 35J60 (E,~) 26.44 ~ U-4 ~05B T .d5 (~) 26.31, ($E)23258 / -36 CB D-5 CATCH ~SiN TC ~0.98 (S) 26.48 -C~' /Lt G-6 ~ INLET : T:29.8~ (SE) 25.30 ~ ~ _. ..... LI G-5 LA~ INLET T723.~5 ~ (E,~) /> I / LI G-7 ~= I~ET T 27.85 (S) 23.85 / ~ ~ ~.,o ' ' ~" / / SUFFOLK CO. P NNING DEPI .- SUB,D REVIEW SECTION C. ci,:jy. THE BREAKERS AT L ~~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NEW YORK Steven J. Hyman, P.E. ~ CARDINAL.~NE The ~efeYYal of chis proposed s~dl~tston ~ ~O~SU/{i~ E~gi~eel' {516) ~tted to the Suffo~ Co~ty Planning Co~{ssion SCALE: /~ = 50~ DATE: NO~ /985 PR~.NO.: 85-~6 SHEET -,~?~,o,o ..... o=,,~.=o~,,, GRADING B DRAINAGE PLAN SHEET N~ ~'~ SHEET N~! S~IEET. NS 2~...~.~ KEY MAP SCALE: 1"=600' FILE _NO~. C- SUFFOLK CO. PLANNING DEM SUB,D REVIEW SECTION · ' The referral of this proposed subdivision plat has been found to be incomplete. The pro- posed subdt~rlsion plat will hay9 to be resub- mitted ~o the Suffolk Cowry Plantin§ Commission vith additional information. DW B / / ./ // / MH % ROAD ._ Please refer to letter for details. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE TYPE CASTING ':: INVERT(S) NUMBER ELEVATION ELEVATION(S) ES G-1 MR G-2 ~C G-14 DW G-15 "DW G-16 DW ~2 END SECTION MANHOLE MANHOLE LAWN INLET LEVEL CONTROL TYPE 1 D'WELL TYPE 2 D'WELL LEVEL CONTROL TYPE 1 D'WELL 20.00 25.00 16.50 t4.00 1~8.00, 18.00 :- 10.00 15.oo (w) ~0.50 (W,N) 16.00, (~,S~) 11.47 (NE)..12.50 (SW) 11.50 (NE,~' 11.25 (SE) .ll.0Q (S):~.50 ~'(N) 7.25 (E,S) 10.67 ~T~/~J O~oPOF~ P~OPOSED U U E2C/~7~ ~LD5 I OUT PARCEL I pgo?osEo SHOPS EX/$TIN,5 ~LO&. TO ~ ~Ofl7~RT~-O TO ,~E..~T,,qd, eFINT IV/Th' OU?~DO0~ L~IAIIhJ6 MR~ P.A,~I~IfJ~ A~JD DgOPO~? At~£A MAIN ROAD (S.R. 25) r EXIS'TI~J6 ~O,~D IVIO'T'H PROPOSEO BUSINESS A REA THE BREAKERS.' LOCATION MAP SCALE: ,J -PROPOSED LEfT HAND TURI~I LAA.IE IIVTO 8REAK£g$ EA~TfA%~E ROAD PROPOSED SITE DA TA OFFICES RESTA URA NT RETAIL SHOPS- BOOKS, CANDLE SHOP; YOGART SHOP,, SNACK BAR,., GIFTS., 8AKERY,, FLOWER SHOP., Etc. PARKING - $70 CARS+- $o, ooos.~ ± OWNER. GREENPORT DEVELOPMENT CORP. 55 GLEN COVE ROAD EX/STING ZONE , M ZONE - LIGHT MULTIPLE RES. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP N-~ I000 SEC. $5, BLK. 1; LOT 25 MAR 21 198~ THE BREAKERS AT ISLANDS.END TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NEW YORK a ~ Steven d. Hyman, P.E. Sl CARDtNAL LANE HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 Consulting Engineer (8~8) 361.6346 SCALE: t" -- 50' DATE: MAR. /986 ~ROJ. NO.: 86-/0 SHEET BUS/NESS AREA SKETCH PLAN l OF I d RECEIVED BY ~Lt~. 1. L~?T 2.'5 l"..-..- I M ZONE Z. IL~/-I-r/,'/L/Z T/,~/,~ jl° t4A L ,v fJ ~/ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / /× 1 IOI_..~ND'S ~,'VD OOLF w.,'~' COLINT~Y COUNTY T, zl, X ~/_/4. /, / ~XI~TIIV~ 80N6: {~ ZON~ ~. I Z, I~4~I L/aNT PIULTI?L[ ~/4,'=,=T Z o¢' d d _X f ~XI¢TI/V~ ~ON~.' F~¢. 17, Iqd~4t 75 /25 - L. IOI-I T M¢IL 77PL_~ /NC,. _> COUNTY, Nfi~ YORA ~MITZ O~NIZA TION 'N l% I00~-0~ :N P~IN~ OATA. ~VAIm~-, N. Y ISLANO5 ~NO ~0[_-t= ond COMNTt~Y CLLI~ -~b~. 1,_ L.Z2T 2~ MOI4'rI~iU£TIPL~ ~ · '~qA TGM F~/qD , I I ~ ~ lq~-~O~ ~ 17q. q'~' ~ F~°-Iq'- $0" ~ _ ~q. GI' I L /O I I F I~I UL TI, m& z= .,~. I§L,~,NO,5 ~N[:) 00£? or~i GOUNTI~Y GLtI~ ~Z~ {"= GOO' O, ff'7,...OD, ,~2/_/~. /, LOT F5 ~XIgTIN~ ~ONE.'7~] ZON~ I=~. I 7, I~ S~,=,=r Z o-? zl '' - ~ .-- -'-- ( eX7STtx~ V~T4 . .: - , / / / / ~. ~h ~ ~.o ' ~. ~M ~l~ ......... ~' 5LI??OLI< C, OLINTY, N~-.I.J YOi~K- IZ~. y P'4~P BO,~L I= I ~ = Coo49~ ~Cx:3/ ~=: I~=~0'-0# F~. 17, I~ E5 o P5 75 .B.t?yOM4 COM~IT"( T~,~ ~ bio. [060 l'q ~OIV£ {_[OMTI~ULTIPI_~ '~TRLIc, / dP.~5 /NO. ~-// / / / //// / ?// / / / ,/ C // // r-F \ \\ TIlE D?£.4/'r, dR5 of' ISLANDS END ~P,~.NtRgRT, 7'OI,,IIV of OOtlTI-IOLO 5UF?OLI4 COUNTY, NEW YORI~ ~CZl[ z= fit= ~C,4L~ : ~. COUNTY T,4X ,,'~ZlP /Vo. 1000 ZCL/<. /, / nT ~5 :L~5~2~. :~ L4NT/~ / / / /? ?1 ~R~-.N ~l'le?~T , N&INTIN~TW , IV6A! YORK P.E(~EIVED BY I/ /// I'~A TGNI £ I P4~ //// "--~/"-'-J ~,~4.~ O/~IN~_F~ ~ ~UL~DIVID~¢: TI-t~ I,~OI~2I,.JIT~ Ot~¢~4NIZATION -. .55 OL.~N C.42V~ ,¢42~,/2 ~/~E£NV,,41..~ , N£1d YOP¢'r, ql ~t~l GTP. Y-EF , hlI. INTIAI~TOIV , NY_.I.4 -I \ / \/ I I I I / // (_ _. / / / I ~C~IL~ /~'= C~O0~ ~UMFDI_~ COUNTY -Ti4~ tbt~£~Y~E/~ at I~LANDS ~ND ~t~_4V~, TOl, qlV of ~OtlT/-IOLD SUFt=OLI~ COUNTY, N~=W YOBI~ ~00.~0' .4 // ,? / // YOUNG ~ YOUNG ALDEN W. YOUNG, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND LAND SURVEYOR N~S LICENSE N0.12845 HOWARD W. YOUNG, LAND SURVEYOR N.YS. LICENSE NO. 4589S 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK TYPe 5LI??OL/,( COMNT¥ , NPW YORI~_ T/-t~ b,~:~.OMllZ / .'tG/D DE. 8ION I-ZW05C,41~ AP.C.141T£OT~ //..ANO PI..,41fN~j~5 ?/O,g~--_,'V ~l'leP_6T , i-/tlNTINOTOtV , N£14 YOle/< / ,.....x x ~. /5/--~ND5 ~ND OOL~ ond COMNTNY CLLI~ ~OAL6 : It~--.BO '-O~' / / / // PO, MO ,~ .~, M , '/ ~ _~ ~- ~ I t /' ,,' ~ -' ~:. ~ / ~ ~ ~ x, ~.,, --',. ~' .:.~..%. --~ -%~.~ ~~ -~~__ - .' I~ / /~ X ~ .'t&v> '- x /t I / i~ / /-- ~ . I ~ ~,~ '.t I % I1~ J --J N/ I ~ / / _ . , . .,,..,.,. , ...,., ...,,,.. _..,_ ' ~ ~C ':~' <." ' ~',' ' / '"' / \ O ZO°-Iq'-$O' ~ OOLF orkd GOUI, t TR Y ,\ TM/= LDI~C~I~C~5 of tSLZI. NDO END AND I-itlNTIN6TON ~ N~14 YONI~ ~=.~A ( ,F:..' 1"=50'-0" N I~EY M,O,P _I \ R~=V: DATE: LC~ T e4:al~ I"~ I00'~0'° PROJ. NO. DWG. NO, OF ~ U E:x. I EG T ~ow N° // /IVC. ¢o~,d con't'-to-I~.d, -" ' / ,/ C JULY 5, 19~ BY: ~ ~ i; , i I- N 6,~t-0 T-50"E' ~76.40 76,g.2 A z 0 t.J r E q, -FA -,r ZO,N5 +t -( ~ ?c'.?~9:~o,,w o, $OHEi)ULE OF ,AREA,,$ "A" ZONE SCENIC "M" ZONE 0 OFFE'R ZONE I OTAL"M"ZONE ~US~t~£ SS-2 -FO-FA L _74.5.~ Aopes ( ,ncl. 2.$04,~c: PqrK) ', EASEMEfC, IT !9. E7l_Aoro$' ,~UFFER PREPARED OGTOSER 21, f970 SM/TH ~JUNG' PATCHOGU£, REVISLr2'-JUI~E 26,1971 -¢ \ / / / /// .I m~p do not ~onsfitute a review of the mag I~ the Suffolk County PI~n~ing CommJsslou ~a~t ~ C~:;~ ~= : l ~' = ~o c o# /V~'r'14, . ,, - ? ~I~T~ ~! ~V.' ,~,. 0 -\ L I,.SL~NL:)¢5 fi. ND OOLF or~i ~OEIVTI~Y C,'U~ Refer to comm~ntm on thim map and comtained , . ~_~. ~ ,, :z~.~~z~w_~.:~~.~ ' --' '"' ~' /,,=~o" ~/~, z ~ . [ ,' - lf 'l~ ' . - , : - , - , ~. - - _ . ! , , . r , ~.~ ~e~ .~ ~v. ~_..~_~ ... .... ~._. TH£ BR£AKERS AT LANDS £ND TOWN OF $OUTHOLD NEW YORK ~ ~--~ PE 3, CARDINALLAN'--~E ~ ~ ........... ~'"~'" ' ' HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 ~ ~ Consulting Engineer (~) 3~-ea~ , Hor iz '1'~ ~' ROA~AY PR~IL~ 8 ............................... ~ ..... = = -a*- - a. = ,,~ .... ~ ................ = - --~ -- ~ ......... .... ~_~ ..... --. ....... =--= ~ __-=--, _. ......... ==_= ~ .... ~ ~ _. ~ ~.~ _~ ~ . . _ ~ .... ~ _ _ _ .-_== .... .~ _ ~ E ........ = ..... ~ ............. ~ ...... E ........... , ..... - - ~ ...... ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ __ _ := _ ~ =~ __ === == : ~-- ____~ __ ~ __ ~ ~ __=~========= ====================================== ====~== =--===== ....... ==~==__= ....... ~ ____ ....~ ~- ~ ............... ~ ........ ~ ........ _ ...... .~ .......................................~ ~ .... ~__ __=_ .~=======-= ........... _.~_ ................................ = ......... ~__=_= == ~ ~ . ......... = _=_ _ -=- ~--. ~ ............ ~ ~, _ .... ~~ ~ -- ~ ............ ~ ...... ~ ............................................. =~=, ==__~ ======~= ========= ..... ~ .......... = ..... ~ _ = = = = ~ -_== ==~ ~ =~- ~ . ~ ~ _ _ ~ = .... ~ -. ~ ~ ..... s~ .... ~ ~--~ ...................... ~ -- ~--~ ......... ~ ......... ~ ........ _ ............................ .......... _ ~ ~ ............. ~ _~_ _~ ~ ~ .._ _ ......................... _ ..... ___ ....... ~ ...... ~ ......... = ......... = ~ ..... ~ .... . .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ....... ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~__~ .... ~ ............. ~ .......... ~_ ~ ........................... ........ ~ ......... __ .................. ~__~_____~__~__ ~ . ~ ..........~ = .... =~__ _ ........................~ = ~ .................. = ........................... ........ ~ ....... = ...... ~ .......... _ ........... ~ ~ ..... __ ....... ......... ~_ _ ~- _. ~ =- == =~ = = ......... ==================================================== .................. ~ ........... ==~======~~~=~== ......... ~ _,_~ ~ ~ =_~ _= ....... =, =~ == ~===- ~--= -- _.~-- _ ~. :~ =__ ==~ = _=== ~Z~ =~ .... ~ .... ~.=~ -======~~ -= ===~ --- = =~=== =~ 2 -";~ % _.%11- _zz-==2~;~%222=%222 ~ _z_z__z___~z ....... Z_Z__~ ...... ~_-~zzz~__zz_Zzz_22Z2~2__zZ .... z_=~-_ .... zzT_Z~_%z2_=% ...... .............. .......... ...... :: ........ -~---~ ~ ~ __ ~ ~-- ~ ~ - : ~ --~=~-- ~ ~ ~ -= ,- ~= ~ ~ -- : =: . ~ ~ --~ ~ ~-- ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLO N. YORK " * : '~YT'f i ,.~t~/~l - ~ Steven J. Hyman, P.E. NAL ~NE ~ - '- . HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 ; ' ~ ~ ~ , Hor~z./" 40' ...... =__= ..... ~ .............. ~ ........ ~_~____ ....... ~ ...... ~___~ ....... ~___~__ ...... _ ...... _ ................. =__~~ .............. ~ ~___~ = ~ ~=== ~ ~ _~ ................... ~ ................................... ~ ................ ~ .................... .... _ ..... ~ ........ = .... . . _ _ ._._=~= = ~_ _ _ ___=~= ...... .__. ....... = , == ..... ==-~== = == ==-= ---~====== ~ -__ ........................... ~==== ==~ ==== ~= ~ = =__= ======= ====~.====~ == === ~ __ -,=_ == ....... ~ ............................... __~ .... ~ ................ ~ _____~___ ~ ...................... _ .... ~ .......... ~ .............. ~ ................................ _ ~ .... .............. ~ _ _ _ .......... ~__~ ......... =__~~ .... ~ .......................... ~ ............. ~__~ =~= == ~ ............... =__~ ........ =_ _ ......... ~ = :~ ~ = =__~ ............ = .............. -- ....... ~ __~=~_~= ~=~ ~ --~-- ---- ~_ NEW YORK ............................ ~ -- ~ ............ ~-- ~ -- .... , ..... ~ ~N OF SOUTHOLD teven J Hvman P E 31 CARDINAL ~NE -- -- - ~ ~?W'~- ' . ~ . ;~ ~ ~ I~1 ~ ~//~ ~ ' ' ~ ' ' HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 }- "'----; ..... , -':--~ 11~.~~- ~ Consulting Engineer ~ .............. ~ -- ........ ~ ~ ~ ~ : S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~== ~ ~ ~~ ~ ......... _ .......... ~ ~ ......................................... ~ ......... ___~ == = ~= ~ ~ ==~== ==== = = --= ~ = === = ~ ~ ~ = = ===~=== ==== .............. _ ............. ==__= == =~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ = === = ==: = ==== ==~ _ __================= ......................... ~ ......... - = ~~ ....... a = = ~a== = ~a~a~B~s~B~ TH~ ~R~AKER$ AT LANDS ~ND -- - [%(~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Consulting Engineer ''~ ' ~ /~ // ~ ~gOFE~S[0~ SCALE:~OrIZ"~DATeNO~ 1985 PROd. NO.: 85-26 SHEET THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END NEW YORK 31 CARDINAL LANE HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. I1788 (5~6) $61~346 85 - :~6 SHEE /2 -- -- ............................... =_== _= ............ ~ ..........~ ~ __ __ ___ = ___ _ ___ --= ...................... ~ ...... z = ==____~EEEEEE E EEEE .... ii ...... iii ............ ---- -- ...... =__ --- ~-......................... ~ ~~ ==== ............................ ====~~ ~_ ~ ~_.~ ___ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~__ ~ ........ ~ ~= =~ .~--. ~. SOUTH~D NEW YORK - a ...... ~--~ =---~= = = ~ ~4, , .;(0%0 Steven J. Hyman, P.E. 31 CARDINAL ~NE - ~ ~ HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 u ......... / i Consulting Engineer (5~) 361-~46 i ss~o SCaL . VerL: 1% ~ . ROADWAY ~OFILE$ 13 OF 25 THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END TOWN OF ~OUTH~LO NE~ YORK Steven J. Hyman, P.E. ~ CARDINAL ~NE HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 Consulting Engineer (5~) ~4~ sc4LE: Verf. : ~"- 4- ~ : NO~ 1985IP~°J' N°'; 85 - 26 SHEET ROA~AY PROFIL~ 14 0F25 THE ~REAKERS. AT £ANDS END TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NEW YORK Her iz. Steven J. Hyman, P.E. Consulting Enginee/ 31 CARDINAL LANE HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 (516) 361-6346 ROADWAY PROF'ILE$ SHEET 15 OF 25 BR~AKffRS AT LANDS ~ND Steven J. man, P.E. 31 CARDINAL ~NE Consulting En neer (5~6) ~1-6346 ~ADWAY PROFILE~ .::=,=:: :: :::: ::::::: :::::: = :::::.~::: :::: :::::::: = == ==: ::=====~========= ==: ==::== ========== ========== ==~==== ====~= YORK YORK ~ LJ t f i- i i I ] L T ~ f THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END  TOWN OF SOUTNOLD NEW YOR~ k I~ Steven J. Hyman. P.E. · ~ ~ Consulting Engineer r~) ~-~ scx~H°riz.'{/~4g'Jo~r;:NO~ 1985 J~.o~..o.=85-26 SHEET Verf?l =4 J J ' 19 0F25 -,,,,. ..... ,~,~,o~ ..... ~,.,, DRAINAGE PROFILES -P/O SYSTEM " B " ~ ~ ~~~E ~~,~~~; ....... ' - DATE tony /985 ~0~. NO 85-26 SHEET PROFILES - PlO SYSTEM "C" 20 0F25 ' ~~ ~~ ~ ' ~1~ ~ ~~ OF SOUTHOLD NEW YORK PROFILES- P/O SYSTEMS "C" ~ "D" 21 oF25 r THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END TOWN OF SOUTHOL D __ _ NEW YORK ~ ~ Steven J. Hvman, P.E. al CARDINAL LANE ~ ~ Consulttng Engtneer ~ ~-~4~ sc~LeH°riz':~~'~ 1985 ~OJ. iO.: 85-~6 SHEET ! I T THE TOWN BREAKERS OF SOUTHOLD AT LANDS END NEW YORK Steven J. Hyman, P.~E. Consulting Engineer 31CARDINALLANE HAUPPAUG~ N.~ 11788 (516) 3814346 ~NOV. 198§ ~85-26 SHEET DRAINAGE PROFILES - SYSTEM "F" 25 oF25 .... .... , l~.~~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~_ ~~~ , ~ , , , ~ , , , , , ~ ~ , , , , ~ ~ , , ~ , , ~ , r ~ . ~ ~ , ~ , , , ,:, i. i:_~~~ , 171 ~ ~ LT~ 'iE~ i 3''~ I ' ~ ~/ ~ , , , ~ / ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - I + -- - ~ -~ I f ' ~ ~~ -9- : ' i ] i I - ~ -+ ~-' , ~d --~ -- ~ ~ -. -- ; ~ ~ .~ ---- I ..... ~' F ~ ---J ' I --T- ~ / ~~-~m t~ ~ ' ' . ' ~ ~~~ ,. %~ -'-~-' - ~ ~-,- ~~ ..... ~ ..... ~,~~.-I:- j ', ~ ! ~ t ~?-~ i'= ~ ~~~', ; , -~4-~~-~..~=~:~ ~~~--',-J=--~ :F-- ~~~, , , ; ~ ~ ~ f~ ----~4~ ! ?~ ~ --:~ ~'..I. ,~~ ]~~ , ~ ~ , -, ~ i ~+~,~, [ ~ ~ ' ~ ~~--~~~~. ~~ . ,~ ,~ ; ~ ~ ' ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~¢ %, ~ ~ ~ ~ .... , ~= , , , ; ',~ 4 ~ , ~-- , , , ~ ~ - - .!--~ ,~ , , I 4~ , ~~ , , ~ U=~--~T2-1 Tz , ~"~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NEW YORK -*,,~:=~,~-~.,~ DRA/NAGE PROF/LES- SYSTEM "Z~ 25 0F25 r THE BREAKERS MATCH , LINE -- SEE SHEET $, N 5": ,,. GENERAL NOTES: ' 7-0 ) OUT ! ~--~4~ ~~: . -- :''-"'.. - LOCATIO~ MAP SCALE: I" =$100' /< ',:.. A-? LC -~ ~LECOUR'T~ . _~-~ pAD ~ ,$ ' t / LP 19° E~.4+97 'i \. i A4A//J ,~ ~-/Jc. !/'/L.~.~'· o~= G/~LZ~O~7--J DRA/NAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULES 7~,~ D. .._,,_, ~ ~ J~/H T.5,'~. ~¢d,d/,t/ LEGEND .,.SCHEDULE . THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END : TOWN OF SOUrHOLD , ST~UCT_U~ .- ~,V , i -~ER : ~ ~ ELEVATION ' ELEV~IO~S~ . ~,' ES A--1. : :, ~D SECTION - -- ~E) 11.50 ~ ..,.~ ~-} >' ;~ A-2 ~f,,~NHO~E f '- T 18.50 (N) ~>.49, (~C~E) t2,~, (E)%~l > LI B716' L~ I~DET ' ~ ~'~ : ~:}~ ~.66 :'[~S~-19-6~'' 1> : , -CB ~4: CA~ ~STN' . ~'26~40 [ - CB A~5~ - ~TCB B~IN TC ~9~7t (W,N~) 15.0~' ; . : . OS B ~ ...,~ ~ ~. ~E~ t : -- '- -" ' 'E~ ~250 - : ~ · - - : ~ E-8 ~NEO~ : - -. : T:-Z3.$5 ,. . ~.-' ~ EOu~ST~,~ ~6~ ~.c~:. CA~C~ ~aSZ~ - ~C /9.7~ (sm'~sr2z ~ . ~~ ~ ] ~ A~ '~NHOLE ' T 19.,75 (S,E) 14.53, (NE) ~5.75 ~ i-~ .... : 'Z . : ~HOLE ' T 23.95 ' 1~E)~16.-46~ ~).~7.2~ : ~. ' : ':~ ~-~ :~ 'C~ ~AS~ z - TC 22~2~ W) 18.22 ': :',~. =: k~--~,7., ~z : C~TCH ~A~ZN :- TC 22.00 (S) 17.50 - ' -- ' ' - s ...... ~ . -{~ W ~ ~ 15~I7 -(N~ 12,-25. : ,, - ..... ;- - ..... . ...... , ............ NEW YORK "- .... 31 CARDINAL LANE ' HAUPPAUGE, N.K 11788 (5~6) 361.6346 Steven J. Hyman, P.E. Consulting Engineer /0~ / 9 86=,~ROJ. NO.: 85-26 SHEET PRELIMINA/~)Y PLAN FOR WATER S~PPLY AND ] OF 4 SEWAGE SYSTEMS 2 SCALE; /" = t SHEET SHEET' N~ 1 KEY MAP, DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE STRECTUP~E TYPE CASTING INVENT(S) NU}~ER ELEVATION ~LEVATION(S) ES D-7 END SECTION -- (S) 11.00 MH E-11 MANHOLE T 25.75 (NE) 21.40, (SW, CB E-12 CATCH BASIN TC 26.35 (SW,NW) 21.73 CB E-13 CATCH BASIN TC 26.35 (SE) 21.85 CB E-t4 CATCH BASIN TC 24.65 (SE,W) 20.02 CB E-15 CATCH BASIN TC 24.65 (E) 20.15 LI E-15 LAWN INLET T 25.10 (SW,NE) 21.10 LI E-17 LAWN INLET T 26.40 (SW~ 22.40 ES H-18 END SECTION -- (N) 17.50 MH E-t9 MANNOLE -T 27.25 (N,S,W) 19.99 MH E-20 M~iNEOLE T 26.00 (W) 20.62, (E,SW) CB E-21 CATCH BASIN TC 25.25 (NE,NW) 20.63 CB E-22 CATCH BASIN TC 25.25 (SE) 20.75 CB E-23 CATCH BASIN TC 25.57 (N,E) 20.94 CB E-24 CATCH BASIN TC 25.57 (S) 21.07 OS E-25 OVERFLOW T 27.17 (S) 24.25 NW) 19.91 20.46 N MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 3 E×IST/'WO PO, Wz~ D-7 / £L.I28. EE CB Mil MH F-7 -Z MH F-2 CB F-3 CB F-4 ES F-5 CB F-8 CB F-9 LI F-10 CB F-14 CB F-15 CB F-!6 ES F-17 MH F-19 CB F-20 CB F-21 CB F-22 LC ~' -2 6 END SECTION -- (E) 21.50 MANHOLE T 28.50 (W,E) 22.69 CATCH BASIN TC 28.00 (W,E) 23.37 CATCH BASIN TC 28.00 (W) 23.50 END SECTION -- (NE) 21.50 MANHOLE T 31.85 (NE) 24.76, (SW,SE) 23.88, (N) 27.85 MANHOLE T 31.30 (NW,E) 24.20, (S) 24.76 CATCH BASIN TC 30.00 (N,E) 25.37 CATCH BASIN TC 30.00 (W) 25.50 LAWN INLET T 29.00 (W) 25.0011,~11 -T 31.30 27.5O SCHEDULE U LAWN LAWN INLET T 37.80 (SE) 32.70 _/ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NEW YORK Steven J. Hyman, P.E. at CARDINAL LANE HA UPPAUGE, N. Y/11788 Consulting Engineer (5~63 361-6346 I SCALE: I"= 50' DATE:FEB. I0., 1986 PROJ. NO.: 85-~6 SHEET PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR WATER SUPPLY AND 2 OF 4 **************************** ....... SANITARY S~IYAGE SYSTEMS M~2qHOLE T 33.50 (N,S) 28.57, NW 29.17 CATCH BASIN TC 33.35 (S) 28.85 CATCH BASIN TC 34.35 (N,SE) 29.72 CATCH BASIN TC 34.35 (S) 29.85 END SECTION -- (W) 21.50 MASrHOLE T 27.00 (E,NW) 23.00 MANHOLE T 29.75 (SE,NW) 24.19, (NE) 25.30 CATCH BASIN TC 28.92 (SE,NW) 24~9 CATCH BASIN TC 28.92 (SE) 24.42 ~4ANHOLE T 31.90 (SW,NW) 26.69 MANHOLE T 31.40 (NW,NE,SE) 27.40 LAWN INLET T 31.85 (SE) 27.85 LAWN INLET T 33.85 (S~) 29.85 LEVEL ~ONTROL T 25.00 (SW) 22.50 DW ~-27 TYPE 1 D'WELL T ~6.50 "Z (NE) 22.25 ?_ ~ ----- DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE SHEET Ne 4 SHEET N°- 1 SHEET N-~ 2 '~/ KEY MAP %:. C-21 /. MH N CB MATCH LINE MH C-Z6 CB CB CB MH MH CB CB CB MH MH CB CB CB CB CB \ \ \ . C-27 SEE 1 SHEET ~0 MH ,, C-44 : .,-,. .:...--..:-- tOLl .'~. . . ' _ '., ' ' ', ;~OZ COURT.... ,:: -. ~--:- ,,---- . . _.. , .- . . ,' .,'" /,,/~4T~'/~ ~L~=%< $.o MA TCH L/NE - SEE SHEET STRUCTURE TYPE CASTING INVERT(S) NUMBER ELEVATION ELEUATION(S) MH C-13 MANHOLk T 29.00 (W) 23.92, (N) 21.88, (E,NW) CB C-14 CATCH BASIN TC 28.93 (E,S) 24.31 CB C-t5 CATCH BASIN TC 28.93 (N) 24.43 MH C-16 MANHOLE T 3i,50 (SE,W) 22.25, (NW) 26.87 C-17 CATCH BASIN TC 31.62 (SE) 27.12 C-18 CATCH BASIN TC 30.00 (E,N) 25.37 C-19 CATCH BASIN TC 30.00 (S) 25.50 C-20 MANHOLE · 32.35 (E,S) 23.61, (NW) 28.01 C-21 b~NHOLE T 32.00 (W~--25.78, (N,S) 24.32 C-22 CATCH BASIN TC 29.50 (N) ~5.00 C-23 CATCH BASIN TC 30.90 (E,SW) 26.28 C-24 CATCH BASIN TC 30.90 (NE) 26.40 C-25 MANHOLE T 33.25 (NE,W) 29.25, (SE,SW) 28.38 C-26 MANHOLE T 34.40 (N,SW) 30.01 C-27 CATCH BASIN TC 36.22 (S,NW) 31.59 C-28 CATCH BASIN TC 36.22 (SE) 31.72 C-29 CATCH BASIN TC 33.07 (NE,S) 28.44 C-30 CATCH BASIN TC 33.07 (N) 28.57 C-31 CATCH BASIN TC 36.33 (E,SW) 31.70 CB C-32 CATCH BASIN TC 36.33 (NE) 31.83 MH C-33 MANHOLE T 29.75 (W) 25.30, (S,N) 22.69 M~ C-34 MANHOLE T 32.50 (N,S) 23.25 MH C-35 MANHOLE T 32.20 (S,N) 24.21 MH C-36 ~NHOLE T 32.25 (S,NW) 25.03, (W) 27.26 CB C-37 CATCH BASIN TC 31.96 (E,SW) 27.33 CB C-38 CATCH BASIN TC 31.96 (NE) 27.46 MH C-39 MANHOLE T 33.75 (SE,NW) 25.64, (N) 29.75 CB C-40 CATCH BASIN TC 34.40 (SE,W) 25.78 CB C-4i CATCH BASIN TC 34.40 (E,W) 25.90 M~ C-42 MANHOLE T 42.25 (S,NE) 31.71 CB C-43 CATCH BASIN TC 37.50 (SW,NW) 33.00 LI C-44 ~WN INLET T 37.85 (SE) 33.85 MH C-45 MANHOLE T 35.60 (E,NW) 26.44 DW C-46 TYPE 1 D'WELL T 31.25 (SE) 27.25 ES D-3 END SECTION -- (NW) 9.50 MH D-4 MANHOLE T 31.85 (N) 26.31, (SE)23.50 CB D-5 CATCH BASIN TC 30.98 (S) 26.48 LI G-5 LAWN INLET T 23.25 (E,NW) 19.25 LI G-6 LAWN INLET T 29.85 (SE) 25.30 LI G-7 LAWN INLET T 27.85 (S) 23.85 DW Y-1 TYPE 1 D'WELL T 33.50 (NE) 30.00 DW Y-2 TYPE 2 D'WELL T 33.50 (SW) 29.90 DW Z-1 TYPE t D'WELL T 37.75 -- 21.40 SCHEDULE 'B' THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END : TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NEW YORK ~I ~ Steven J. Hyman, P.E. 31 CARDINAL LANE- ~ Consulting Engineer (8~) 361-6346 ESS~ SCALE: /"= 50' DATE:FEB. 10~1986 PROJ. NO*: 85-26 SHEET PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR. WATER SUPPLY AND 3 OF 4 SHEET SHEET N~ ! % SHEET N°- 2 KEY MAP SCALE; 1%600, G t~-~-~/~O/i~- 14/~7-~-~ -- / -... '.'::: .~ ["- ::: ~i'-:':': b:: :" :':::': :';~:':':: ~':~:.:::~ '?::~ "':~ ..i'~ :' :.: :-:' :" ¥- -....~ ...-~ ........ ~::: ~ :" : ':" - ' ,- H/~ ~0/~ -...:.-...,-........,-...--,,- ................ . '-' .-. -.-' ':-:...-...-. -. ..... . ' .. -.-,--.,' ,-- .--~ ...... , -,-.-. ...... . .: ...... . ..... . "-.--.-.- :.-,',-- :,: . ::. ",- · -' "'."::.:-:::-'::: :-:: '" '"" ':':v:: .... ':":':'"~i~::~; . .'::'J~:~.~:~ '" ' '" .':.:r'----'-'-:--'::": :: : ' ::':'.:'":.:' :::~..: ~,~ ,:::' .-:::: :::: ¥..::.. ::.. :.: :-:-¥,.- . .., _ ~ ".::~.' ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ' ' " J~ ~1~ F/~ DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE STRUCTURE TYPE CASTING NUMBER ELEVATION INVERT(S) ELEVATION(SJ MH G-2 MH G-3 LI G-4 LC G-14 DW G-15 DW G-16 LC ~hl END SECTION -= :" (W) ~0.5Q MANHOLE T 20.00 (W,N) 16.60, (E,S) MANEOLE T 25.00 (N,SW) 11.47 LAWN INLET T 16.50 (NE} 12.50 LEVEL CONTROL T 14~00 (SW) 11.50 TYPE 1 D'WELL T 18.00 (NE,NW) 11.25 TYPE ~ D'WELL T 18.00 (SE) ll.0Q LEVEL CONTROL T 10.00 (S 7.50 TYPE 1 D'WELL T 15.00 (N) 7.25 10.67 SCHEDULE 'B" THE BREAKERS AT LANDS END .' -- ' ' · HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 ~J Conault, ng Engineer PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR WATER SUPPLY AND