Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-35.-1-4Box 1925 8Qulhold, NY 11871 ~ou~//o~/ /j, )<. //?7/ ~o,..Sm J./o~_¢'o/../ RECEIVED NOV 15 to02 Sogthold Town Cie& ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 13, 2001 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Town Board of the Town of Southold will hold a public hearing at 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 26, 2002 on the enclosed proposed Change of Zone Application, Petition No. 319 of Ma Tine, Inc. requesting change of zone from R-40 Residential District to AHD Mfordable Housing District on property located at Greenport, New York. Please sign the duplicate copy of this letter and return to me in the enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope. Thank you. -Eii-~oeth A. Neville-t' Southold Town Clerk Attachments CC: Suffolk County Department of Planning Long Island State Park Commission Village of Greenport Town of Shelter Island Town of Riverhead Town of Southampton Southold Town Planning Boardl~ Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING V-146 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold has received a petition to amend the Zoning Map of the Town of Southold by changing the Zoning District designation ofSCTM # 1000~035.00-01.00-004.000 from the Low Density Residential (R-40) to the Affordable Housing District (AI-ID). NOTICE IS HEREBy FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, the Town Board of the Town of Sonthold _will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on the Aforesaid LOCAL LAW atthe SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL 53095 Main Road _Southold~ New York at 5:00 p.n~ Tuesda¥~ March 26~ 200r. The purpose of the Local Law is to Change the Zoning District Designation of SCTM # 1000-035.00-01.00. 004.000 from the Low Density Residential (R-40) to the Affordable Housing District Designation. The petitioner for this request is MaTine Inc.. The legal description of the aforesaid property is as follows: All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being near Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York and bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point on the northerly line of the North Road which point of beginning is the southwesterly comer of the premises herein described and the sou~easterly comer of lands now or formerly ofEhzabeth T. Albertson and others; running thence northerly along the easterly line of lands now or formerly of Elizabeth T., Albertson and others to the southerly line of lands now or formerly of Dorothy Barstow; thence easterly along the southerly line of lands last mentioned and lands now or formerly of Herbert Fordham to the westerly line of Sound Road or Avenue; thence southerly along the westerly line of Sound Road to lands now or formerly of Whitney; thence westerly and again southerly along the aforementioned lands to lands now or formerly of Kszyminski; thence westerly and again southerly along lands last mentioned to the northerly line of the North Road; thence westerly along the northerly line of the North Road to the point or place of the BEGINNING. DESIGNATION OF SCTM # 1000~035.00-01.00_004.000 FROM THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-40) TO THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISTRICT (AHD)". Copies of this Local Law are available in the Office of the Town Clerk to any interested persons during regular business hours. Any persons desiring to be heard on the proposed amendment should appear, and has the right to appear, at the time and place above so specified. Any person also has the right to submit written comments to the Southold Town Clerk either prior to the Public Heating or at the Public Heating. BY ORDER OF THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK. Dated: February 26, 2002 Copies to the following: Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk The Suffolk Times Town Board Members Town Attorney Planning Board Catherine Mesiano Ma Tine, Inc. Catherine E. Tasker Abigail Wickham, Esq. Town Clerk Bulletin Board 5:00 PAl. ON CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATION OF SCTM #1000-035-01-004, MATINE, INC., FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISTRICT DESIGNATION. Present: Supervisor Joshua Y. Horton ~ ~"~g Justice Louisa P. Evans Councilman William D. Moore Councihnan Jotm M. Romanelli Councilman Craig A. Richter Councilman Thomas H. Wickham Town Clerk Elizabeth A. Neville Town Attomey Gregory A. Yakaboski $outhold Town Plannin9 Board SUPERVISOR HORTON: We at this time will open up the public hearing on changing the zoning district designation of Suffolk County Tax Map #1000-35-01-004, MaTine, inc., Low Density Resideutial to Aflbrdable Housing District Designation. This is a public hearing. If there are any concerns of the community members that would like to address the Board. COUNCIl,MAN WICKHAM: "NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold has received a petition to amend the Zoning Map of the Town of Southold by changing the Zoning District designation of SCTM # 1000-035.00-01.00-004.000 from the Low Density Residential (R-40) to the Affordable Housing District (AHD). NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the C.o. de of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, the Town Board of the Town of Southold will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on the Aforesaid LOCAL LAW at th~. SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL~ 53095 Main Road~ Southold~ New York at 5:00 p.m.~ Tuesda¥~ March 26~ 2002. The purpose of the Local Law is to Change the Zoning District Designation of SCTM # 1000-035.00-01.00-004.000 from the Low Density Residential (R-40) to the Affordable Housing District Designation. The petitioner for this request is MaTine Inc.. The legal description of the aforesaid property is as follows: All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being near Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York and bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point on the northerly line of the North Road which point of beginning is the southwesterly comer of the premises herein described and the southeasterly comer of lands now or formerly of Elizabeth T. Albertson and others; running thence northerly along the easterly line of lands now or fom~erly of Elizabeth T., Albertson and others to the southerly line of lands now or formerly of Dorothy Barstow; thence easterly along the southerly line of lands last mentioned and lands now or formerly of Herbert Fordham to the westerly line of Sound Road or Avenue; thence southerly along the westerly line of Sound Road to lands now or formerly of Whitney; thence westerly and again southerly nerd~crlv linc o~thc Nmtl~ Road to [l~c point o~ place olthc BI'(ilNNIN( J. - I)cccnfl~cr Bt.IN(ANI) INTENDED TO BE thc sm~c promises co~xcved by dccd dated Property is approximately 5.7 z~crcs. The Local Law is entitled, "A LOCAL hAW TO ~END THE ZONING MAP OF THE TO~ OF SOUTHOLD BY CH~G~G THE ZO~G DIST~CT DESIGNATION OF SCTM ~ 1000-035.00-01.00-004.000 FROM THE LOW DENSITY RES~ENT~L (R-40) TO THE ~FO~ABLE HOUS~G DIST~CT (~D)". Copies of this Local Law are available in the Oflice of the Town Clerk to any interested persons during regular busiuess honrs. Any persons desiring to be he~d on the proposed amendment shoLdd appel, and has thc ~gbt to appear, at the time and place abow so specified. Any person also has the right to submit written comments to th~ Southold Town Clerk ~ither prior to the Public Hearing or at the Public Heating. By order of the Town Board of the Town of Southold, Southold, New York. Dated: Febnm~ 26, 2002. Elizabeth A. Neville, Southold Town Clerk." I have before me several affidavits. ~ affidavit that the Towu Clerk has posted this on the Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, and in addition I have an affidavit of publication in the Suftblk Times newspaper including all the legal print. I have some co~espondence on this including a memorandum ~om the Town Pla~ing Board, which I should read. To Joshua HoNon, Supe~isor, Members of the Town Bo~d, from Valefie Scope, the Town Pla~er, and the Chai~an of the Pla~ing Board, Be~ett Orlowski reg~ding this proposal dated M~ch 25th. The petition is to change the zone of 5.5 acres p~cel ~om R-40 to ~D, Aflbrdable Housing. It is unclear whether the applicant proposes to construct ten or thiNeen homes because the map, enviromental assessment fo~, ~d application present conflicting info~ation. These discrep~cies have been brought to the attention of the Town Attorney's Office, ~d to the best of our understating the applicant's attorney has been asked to resolve them. However this info~ation has not been received by this office in time to be included in this repoa, which at the To~ Board's request is being prepared in advance of it's M~ch 26t~, 2002 public being. The p~ose of the ~D District is defined in ~e Sou~old Town Zoning Code is, quote, to provide the oppo~ity wi~n c~an ~eas of the to~ for the development of hi~ density housing for f~ilies of moderate income, end quote. According to the fo~ulg s~t fo~ in the Zoning Code the income limits for eli~ble applic~ts to p~ch~e one of these homes r~g~s ~om $44,100 for a single person to $83,100 for a fmily of ei~t people. ~e re~md~ ceil~g on home prices offered wi~n the ~ Dis~ct is $168,000 per unit. It should be not~ ~at this limit is lower ~ ~e m~imm sales pfioe ~or affordable housing pmu~t to Sugo~ Co~ty guidelines, which is $237,500. The provisions of~ ~ Dis~ct is set fo~ in the Town C~e req~red Sat the subject prope~y lie within 1/4tk o~ a mile of the boodles of ~e inco~orated VilNge of ~eenpon. The intent of ~e Zoning Code is ~at Ngher density housing be looated wi~in or ne~ the h~let centers. This prope~y lies be~een 1,200 ~d 1,300 feet no~ of ~e Village's bounds, less th~ a qumer of mile. ~e provisions of the ~ Dis~ct also require ~at where the subject prope~y is less th~ fiw acres in ~ea the applic~t shall a~ee to rese~e at least 40% of the dwelling units, or lots for sale, or le~ed to moderate-income fmilies. The applic~t proposes to rese~e 70% of the units for moderate income. Fu~her ~e applio~t offers to restrict ~e potential total squ~e footage of the remaining ~i~ ~its. ~e subject lot is zoned R-40, wNch would pe~it the ~eo~tica cons~ction of four or five dwelling units. If ~ted the petition would allow at least a doubling of th~ allowable density to ten units. Enviro~ental issues, the prelimina~ review of the material submitted for this petition indicate ~at a potion of the prope~y may contain a fresh water wooded wetl~d, and if so this potion would lie within the jurisdiction of the Bo~d of Trustees. Further New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Prese~ation has dete~ined this site may be ~cheological s~nsitive. the c~rr'cnt zoning normally ~mmld not be expected lo signillca~lt, l towcve~, duc to c existing trarlic congestion and hazards /bund at the nearest intersection coupled with thc tmMqown impact of the recenlly opgraded Shady Lady Restanrant and Hotel this issae requires more inlbnnation and analysis. Before an enviromnentaI dote~ination is made refegal of this petitiou to the Board of Trust~es for their input is recommended. Also a stage one cullural resource assessment shonld be conducted by the npplicanl, aud a report submitted to the State and Towu lbr review. ~put of'the Suffolk County Water Authority aud the Snflblk County Department of Health Services should be obtained as part of the coordinated environmental review of this project parsuant to SEQ,. A re~iew of the traffic sittmtion at the intersection of Sound Road, and State Road 25 should be undertaken. Recommendations, lhere is insufficienl inlbnnation to render a recommendation. The Plam~ing Board will not comment further on this specific application until the above noted intonation is st~bmitted and roviewed pursum~t to SEQ,. Finally, for tbe past several years the Planning Board has strongly recommended the ~D legislation be revised, because it does not adequately address the affordable housing issue. There for the Planning Board will not recommend ch~ging any property to this designation until the key deficiencies of existing legislation are readdressed. I have several other communications regarding this, which I should read. This is handwritten. I may have a little trouble with it. To the Southold Town Board, subject zoning ch~ge to this pa~icul~ parcel. As a longtime resident of the corner of Sunset L~e and Sutton Place I object ve~ strongly to any zoning chm~ge that would destroy the tranquility of this quite residential street. Congestion and occupants of thi~een bomes on this small lract of land, 5.7 acres, plus accesso~ ap~ments, etc. c~ lead to nothing bnt problems for the neighborhood. Traffic congestion from Peconic Lm~ding, fe~ traffic, Shady Lady, Rock ~dge n Moore s Lane No~h, and affordable housing project east of S~ Simeon on Route 48 should be considered. Mys~lg and residents would appreciate a negative vote on the zoning oh~ge. R~spectively, Ke~eth T~er. CATHY MES~O: This request is for a rezoning approval ~om ~ Southold Town Bo~d ~om Low D~nsity Residential R-40 Dis~ot to Affordable Housing ~D DistNot. The subject prope~y is a 5.7- aero p~oel located at 69125 Co~ty Road 48, which is th~ No~ Road, ~d So~d Road in Gre~npo~. The p~cel is g~n~rally l~wl. Ther~ ~ ~ees. There ~e no w~fi~ds associated with ~s p~oel. The i~ediat~ ar~a is a d~veloped residential n~i~borhood consisting of ~ to 1/3-aero plots. The density allOwed ~der th~ pr~s=nt zoning, R-40, is five oonfo~ing lots. The density allowed ~der the proposed oh~ge of zone results in ~e creation of twenty-four 10,000 squ~e foot lots. It is the intention of ~e d~veloper to limit the ~eld to ten lots with no l~ss the 15,000 squ~e fe~l each, ~d oreat~ a nat~ buffer approximately 1.7 acres. The proposed buffer is the h~avily treed ~ea along the sou~erly prope~y lin~ at a dep~ of approximately 166 f~et deep along ~e No~h Road, sixty feet d~pth along ~e westerly lot lin~. The siz~ of the proposed lots generally exceeds that of ~e lots in ~ea. Sewn of th~ lots are to b~ offered ~der the provisions of ~ Town's Affordable Housing Pro~. The homes proposed will be s~ven affordable lots will be a mix of approximately 1,200 to 1,400 squ~e exp~dable caped styled houses, ~d r~ch style homes. The Cap~ style houses consisting of ~o b~ooms, one ~d a half baths, full basement, one c~ g~age, ~ ~finished second floor approximately 600 squ~e feet. You should ~ow that the unfinished second floor provides the oppo~unity for additional ~o bedrooms and one bath which for a young couple st~ing out. The ranch style ranging between 1,200 and 1,400 squ~e feet each having t~ee bedrooms, one and a half to two baths, covered porch, full basement, a one-car garage. The homes will c~ price tags of $168,000. This project involves no public funding. The t~ee remaining lots will be m~keted for traditional style homes with approximately 1,500 square feet, each having three bedrooms, one and a provided thc Boar& as I ment oned, a packet of san~plc l~ottse plans reprcsentatixe o1' tlxosc proposed low profile rancl~ and cape style traditional l~ouscs Thcsc houses will be (~17 xarying designs, but m keeping with the tone of the neighborhood. The need for affordable housmg on North Fork has been well documented. The site is well situated to meet the criteria set fo~h in the Zoning Code for the ~D District, as it is located approximately h mile kom the bounda~ of the Village of Greenpo~. The area in which the prope~y is located consists of lots containing as little as 5,500 square feet to 22,000 feet. The Town's Master Plan provides for the creation of Affordable Housing Districts. We believe this project is consistent with the coucepts set forth in the AHD criteria in that the opportunity for the development of high-density housing for families of moderate income will be created. The proposed project fulfills the stated propose of ~xicle V of the Zoning Code of the Town of Southokl and will be consistent with the character of the surrounding area. The subject property is located in a mixed-use area. Although the propeNies adjacent to the site are zoned R-40, most are non-confo~ing ~dersized lots. Within close proximity are R-80, Limited Business (LB), Affordable Housing (~D) District and Residential Office (RO) uses. The subject prope~y is within walking dist~ce to the Village of Greenpo~ downtown ~ea, houses of worship, ~d public transpo~ation. The ~ea is se~iced by the Suffolk County Water Authority ~d L~A. No public sewer system is available. On- site septic systems with be desired to conform to Suffolk County Health Depment st~dards, which call for 20,000 sq. ft. lots in areas se~iced by public water. Our proposed ~eld exceeds the Health Dep~ment standards. It is anticipated that the traffic generated by this project will not compromise the safety ~d capacity of the street system in the area. Two of the proposed l°ts will ~ont on Sound Road ~d have direct access. Access to ~e remainder of the lots will be ~om Sutton Place to S~set Co~, the proposed cul-de-sac. Catch basins ~e proposed at the no~herly ~d southerly ends of Sunset Court to m~age ~y runoff generated by the improvement of Sunset Com. ~e hi.way improvements will manage the road moff by these catch basins that will be desired in accord~ce with appropriate flows of water based on the Town's criteria. Catch basins will be created in accordmce with ~at. The ~off that is presently a problem, or which seems to be a problem b~d on some of ~ese le~s I th~ is problem ~at ~e residents need to disc~s wi~ ~e Town's Hi.way D~ment ~ road runoff is ~e responsibility of ~e Tom's Hi.way D~ment ~d not the re~onsibility of subsequent developers. I would ~so like to respond to ~e Piing Bond's statement ~at ~ey would m~e no reco~endafion ~til ~e ~ zo~ng is ~er cl~fied. We cm only deal wi~ ~e roles as they exist today, ~d I don't thi~ ~at applic~ts whether it is before ~is Bo~d, the Plying Bo~d, the Trustees, or ~e ZBA c~ be held to a st~d~d, wNch doem't yet exist, ~d we cm only deal wi~ ~e set of roles that exists today. We have applied to ~s Bo~d b~ed on today's roles ~d requirements, ~d we have made evew attempt to ad.ess all ~e issues ~at ~e presently out ~ere. So, I have no ~her co~mts, but if you have questions I will be gl~ to ~ess ~em. COaChMAN ~CHTER: Th~ you, ma'm. I have a question. The access off Sutton is that the Town owned propegy ~ea? CATHY MESIANO: Yes, there are two parcels. COUNCILMAN RICHTER: I know it very well. I grew up three houses from that area. That was a sump at one time. I have a scar to prove it right up on this eyebrow where I got hit when I was ten with a rock out of that sump. I don't know how it is right now. I haven been by that in awhile, but that is CATIIY MESl/xN(): 'Fha druinage phm is outJincd on (he maps that [ have xtlbmittcd io ~bc t~om'd 1 il;we lnore lnat)s i~' )oil xA otlld like mc to proddc }ou with them, but, },es, dryxx ells will be installed to contain the runoff geucrated by the improvement of Sunset Court. SUPERVISOR HORTON: One thing that I have noticed that this zone change has been played with is misnse of the road names is Sound Road and Snnset Court and Sutton Place. CATHY MESIANO: Adually Sunset Lane. SUPERVISOR HORTON: Sunset Lane exactly, just to clanl~ it. I read off of this. Just to clarify that. Greenport is getting very sensitive about that. GARY CHARTERS: Good afternoon. My name is Gary Charters. I live in the hamlet of Greenport within the Town of Southold, and I am presently the President of the Board of Education of the Greenport School District. I have a prepared statement. I come before you on behalf of the Greenport Board of Education to ask for consideration. Recently we have been reading the local newspapers about proposals to increase housing density on vacant land. The proposal we have read about range from rezoning 5.7 acres of land on which five houses could be built to double that amount for ten homes. Although this is a small development several of these changes or the approval of rezoning to allow fifty-four t~vo family houses would have a devastating impact on our school district. For the past decade Greenport has had the highest school tax rate on the North Fork, and we have worked hard to keep it in check by regularly keeping our tax rate increase lower than the inflation rate. In fact, this year we expect little or no increase in our tax rate. However, if you were to approve any upzoning changes in the Greenport District which would cause an increase in the student population it would cause us to expand our facilities to accommodate additional enrollment. This would create a tremendous burden upon those of us currently residing in the Greenport School District. Although they would be added assessed evaluation with the development it would be miniscule when compared with the expense of expanded educational services. We ask that you consider these consequences when you deliberate on any zone changes in the Greenport School District, which would increase housing density above current levels. We would also welcome the opportunity to be informed of any of these proposals when they are received by the Town, and gladly will provide you feedback after discussing the issues at a regular Greenport School Board meeting. Your consideration is greatly appreciated, and I thank you very much. SUPERVISOR HORTON: Thank you, Gary. GARY CHARTERS: I will give a copy of this to the Town Clerk, and in attempting to keep our budget low I only have one copy. SUPERVISOR HORTON: Any other members of the community like to address the Board? Yes, sir? MAX DOBLER: My name is Max Dobler. I am at 68835 North Road in Greenport, which is the property adjoining the land in question right now. I am also a member of a loose community, a group we are trying to set up called the Sixty-Seven Step Association, which I think the Board knows since you built a beautiful sixty-seven steps going down to that lower beach area. This particnlar petition that people. If you like, [ could read it, ii'you want rue SUPERVISOR HORTON: Actually il you are going to submit it, s~;', I havo a pretty good iclca of what it is. M~ DOBLER: This pertains, we are not in favor of do;w~zoning because of exactly the thoughts that the School Bo~d in Greenpoa have voiced, ~d the drainage problem, also the taxes, which our community is veU high in taxes right now, and we certainly would not appreciate a higher tax increase. So, I would like to oflkr this to you, and give it deep consideration if you will. SUPERVISOR HORTON: Thank you. Joan? JOAN EGAN: Thank you. Hello, everybody. There are a number of things that a developer has not taken into consideration. Joan Egan of East Marion. I don't think I need the microphone. A very important factor for the developer to consider is that the Department of Transportation will widen the road there to make a two and two on each side. The safety of the children to get all the people who might reside in that development would be humongous. In addition the safety of those people with regard to our Police Force, which must be enlarged for many, many reasons. Incidentally, I thought it used to be the 77 Steps, when 1 first came out here. No? Am I wrong? SUPERVISOR HORTON: You are wrong, yes. JOAN EGAN: I am? Well, that is the first time today. Now, the widening of the roads, now~ in addition you talked, I think I did not hear also about Budget plans for another park in East Marion. The Town of Southold, as you know, I am sure you saw my comments in the paper in regard to another park in East Marion where the East Marion/Orient owns that property, but let's stay with this issue. I think you are creating a horrible, horrible situation and the traffic up there unless you put a sub,police station up on one of those comers there you are going to be in a lot of trouble. Thank you very much. Did everybody hear me? ALEX WlPF: My name is Alex Wipf. I am President of Save Open Spaces Now 2000, and I am here to speak against the proposed increased density. I would like to make it clear right offthe bat that Save Open Spaces Now is not against providing affordable housing to the people in town who need it. What we are against is using new housing to provide, in quotes, affordable housing, because it develops open land, and like everyone else in this town we want to preserve as much open space in farmland as possible. A much better alternative would be the building of accessory apartments in already established buildings. There is going be hopefully a story this week in The Suffolk Times. Gwen can tell you if it is going to be there or not, about an organization, a non-profit organization, called Community Housing Innovations. This is a non-profit organization that is seeking takers for $10,000, $20,000 grants to build accessory apartments in akeady established housing at affordable rates, and for a period of ten years. We object for a further reason. The past developments that have been built as affordable housing, new developments, don't always end up affordable. As a matter of fact they usually don't end up affordable. The first part of this process is your approvals, this very approval that is being sought by the developer at this point, and I don't know this developer. I am really speaking about past affordable housing developments. The way as I understand it, it works is the community COUNCILMAN ROMANELLI: Everyone of them. ALEX WIPF: $50,000? COUNCILMAN ROMANELLI: Everyone that applied for grants in the last at least two aflbrdable housing projects, applied for grants, was eligible lbr grants, got the money lbr the grants. ALEX WIPF: Hoxv nmch were the grants? JIM MCMAHON: $30,000. ALEX W1PF: $30,000 grants. All of them were gotten. The $50,000 grant will come through on this as well? JIM MCMAHON: This particular application does not request any assistance in grant money. ALEX WIPF: So, there are no grants in this housing development at all? Then I have been misinformed about this. I think the important point to make is that if grant monies are applied for, and they don't come through then it adds to the cost of the house. In addition there are other things to be considered. The asking price for an affordable house is before add-ons are added. It is not uncommon for developers to add, to say if you want particularly windows, if you want particular accessories, it is going to increase the cost of the house. I think that is something that also has to be investigated. How many houses have been sought at the asked for price, or have there been a number of add-ons? These add-ons, the grants that may or may not come in, and my understanding is that they all didn't come in, but I take you at your word, Jim. Add the cost of the house, and what happens is it pops it out of the rate of people who are seeking affordable housing. Also, the cost of the housing themselves really fits into, not the lowest level of affordable housing, which is where CHI would come in. It fits into that group of people that are right on the edge, and if any increase in cost pops them out of it. I think that we have to check very carefully before you grant this density increase. I have nothing else to say other than I believe you would have to examine the past record of affordable housing projects to see who is actually in those projects, to see if in fact there were people who were qualified for affordable housing. CHI is a much better altemative, and I hope in fact you will consider developing in already established housing, and to see if it works before you grant any density increases and build new housing in open space. Thank you. MELANIE NORDEN: Many of those of us who live in this neighborhood have been very concerned about the SEQRA Review process. Melanie Norden on McCarm Lane, Greenport. Many of us who live in this neighborhood have been concerned about the SEQRA Review process, and the County Plamfing Commission, and also, the Southold Planning Board, and how the economic, social, environmental factors, and all those things that are to be considered by the Town Board as the lead agency will in fact be considered. The Planning Board has read a report this evening, but though this application has been before the town since last July there still isn't enough information for the Planning Board to conduct a would like to :tctually ~tsl4 the Touxn Attorney if he cotfld conm~ent a little bit on whnt the Review process is, atqd hoxx it should tmLbld, bcczlusc in point of thct this shoutd all ixa~c happened presumably by the limo that tho application has come to this point TO~ ATTORNEY y~OSKI: A couple of things, Melanie. Number one, 1 believe the Board is going to be keeping this hearing open pending a completion of the SEQRA process. That is point number one. So, there will be no vote this evening. MELANIE NORDEN: I understand that but isn't the SEQRA process, and it's components supposed to be basically completed by the time the public hearing takes place'? TOWN ATTORNEY YA~OSKI: You can go either way on that. MELANIE NORDEN: Not according to what I have read. TOWN ATTORNEY YAKABOSKI: What is happening is the SEQRA process being completed additional information was requested by the environmental folks that did the report, and a letter has gone out to the applicants saying we need the additional information. What is going to happen is o,nce the additional information is completed, and the Board wilt have to render a SEQRA Determlnatm . The SEQRA Determination will then be forwarded as lead agency the SEQRA Determination will then be forwarded to both the Town Planning Board, and the Suffolk County Plamfing Commission. MELANIE NORDEN: But, why was this not done before this came to a public hearing? TOWN ATTORNEY YAKABOSKI: As I said, you can do it different ways. See what is going to happen the important point about that, Melanie, is that this Board and the other Boards, excuse me this is one rendering the decision, will not be making a decision prior to SEQRA being completed. One of the important factors of SEQRA, and I think is an opportunity like this, the community to give input. For example, the sump question, which was back and forth a few moments ago, that is one of the benefits of having the folks in the community come forward at a public hearing like this to render that kind of information to help fill out the Board's knowledge, so that when the other Town Planning Board, the Suffolk County Planning Commission, give their advisory opinions they have a full and complete picture. MELANIE NORDEN: I disagree. Actually the Planning Board in point of fact if it were to have done its job as stated in the Town Code it would have analyzed all of these factors, and all of these engineering factors. The sump question has been brought up here repeatedly for months. The very fact that the Planning Board has not been able to address this yet, and needs information from laypeople about a serious engineering issue on property owned by the Town I think is a specious argument. In point of fact all of this information has been given at these meetings for months, and we have written letters repeatedly about this, and it seems that there is something that is very backward in a process, which now says we are at a public hearing, but we don't have all the information: There has been errors in the application. The application, by the way, calls for thirteen lots and not for ten lots, so we are even getting a presentation tonight that is different from the actual application that is before the .town, and now we are told that we are at a public hearing, but we don't have any of the information alld 1]~;Jl~e SLiIC Il/at Wc ~(110~ Ihal OLII'-I'owl] Boat-d has II]at il/J¥1'l]/;dioll. TOWN ATTORN[iY Y,~d~ABOSKI: You are still going to get all that. You are going to got all that information. You are going to get all that. We are not closing the hearing. MELANIE NORDEN: I nnderstand that, but I thi~4: that in point of fact that information shoold have been here prior to the public hearing, and it indicates I think both in the Town Code, and in the SEQRA guidelines that intbnnation should be conducted and should be available. We have a lot of economic, social, environmental factors, and we have no information tonight that is speaking to those, and we have a Planning Board that hasn't rendered a review. Tbey have only rendered a report, and they basically said we can't make a decision yet. The serious part about that is that, that may in fact chm~ge the vote. SUPERVISOR HORTON: Thank you. Are there any other comments on this particular public hearing? DOUG COOPER: Doug Cooper from Mattituck, ladies and gentlemen. In the time that the town is now facing density issue as to how much we wish to grow, and preserving farmland and open space I strongly support high density around the hamlets and in the hamlets. However I don't believe this should be given away for free. I think the Town needs some kind of a TDR Progrmn or at least the owners buy some development rights or other farmland or open space, and extinguish them in the increase in density. I think that is vital for this town and the commtmity as we go towards the future. Thank you. JIM DINIZIO: Jim Dinizio, 39 Sound Road. I live just about five houses away from this development. I have to agree with Melanie 100%, and I think what she is saying that you are unprepared for this meeting. I think that the Planning Board basically stated that, too, that they cannot make a decision because they don't have enough information, and to rely on laypeople, as Melanie said, is not the proper procedure. We are relying on you, and you should rely on your experts. That is what we pay them for out of our taxes. If the Suffolk County Planning and the Planning Board itself can not look at an application after the many applications that they have looked at and make an intelligent decision. That application was not complete. Okay? And that to my mind falls in one direction, the person that is supposed to give you these resolutions complete. So, I ask you that you not hold this heating open, that you close it right now, or after everybody has commented, and you make a resolution voting it down right now. If they want to come back with an application that is complete, then let them come back with an application that is complete that we all sit around on our 67 Steps Association meetings, discuss intelligently as opposed to being held in the dark whether on purpose or not. We are still in the dark as to how things are going to go there. I have many questions myself. I was depending on the Planning Board to answer them. They have not. So, I ask you to make a resolution tonight, and vote no. Thank you. SUPERVISOR HORTON: Any other comments fi.om the floor? GWEN SCHROEDER: Hi, Gwen Schroeder, North Fork Environmental Council, and I want to second Doug Cooper's comments. That time when the Town is looking at ways to control density and Thanks. [ just have some comments lbr Botty. ELIZABETHMORRISON: Mynameis Elizabeth Morrtson. I havebccn a residentoi'(h'ccnpcnl all my life. I moved away for tire years at~er high school to se~w'e in the military, and when i moved back the phces of the houses were completed inflated. There is nothing left for people in our price range. We actually have a mortgage qualified for. We just can't use it because we cau't afford anything out here, and if you take a look around you people with unlimited resources are building on the vacm~t tots ~ay. So, I ~ confident they ~e going to control what they build, it is not going to be ridiculmts and I mn sure they are going to do their jobs, but [ really think we need this out here. Yot know, my husband ~d I are yew hard working and I ~ow lots of people who are living with their parents waiting for something to come along when it is just not. This is their only hope. This is the only way we will be able to stay in Greenport, and we would really like to. We love Greenpo~. That is why we moved back. So, please, thi~ about that. Tha~ you. S~ERVISOR HORTON: ~e there any other con~ents kom the floor in regard to this public hearing? RON PASC~E: My name is Ron Pascale over on 29 Sound Road. I would like to tha~ the Town Attorney's Office for doing his due diligence in investigating the original application when they put it in on ~e prope~y on the sou~ side of the No~ Road. 1 got a letter in July, and ~en they turned ~ound, and I got another letter in Au~st completely reversing it. it seems like a developer didn't ~ow where they w~ted to put this project. I was bom in Greenpo~ 63 ye~s ago, love the area. It seems ~e m~tra of the whole Sou~old Town ~is prese~ation. We ~e t~ng ~ area of 5.7 acres, and dividing it to ten to ~Meen lots, which is 350% less l~d for a p~icul~ house. It doesn't m~e sense. There w~ t~ a few months ago, ~d a year ago, about increasing the lot size to five acres. That is prese~ation. Now, you ~e dividing it down to 350%. You ~e putting ten to ~i~een houses on a small ~ea. You c~ put fo~ ho~es on ~at ~ea. k my mo~er's back y~d ten feet ~om her be~oom window is a b~er zone. You have a buffer zone on ~e No~ Road of sixW feet. On the houses ~at ~e ~ong Sold Road you ~ve a buffer of fi~n feet. It is cr~y. You have a piece of prope~y here ~at is rich in ~ldlife. You ~e gong to des~oy it by putting ten to fifteen lots on it. I h~ted on ~. Wic~m's prope~y whm I w~ a kid. We went to hie school toge~er. ~ God, 8ou~old To~ h~ been doing a job of prese~ation. Eve¢ody is for affordable housing, but not des~o~ng this piece of properly. Put yo~ ~o houses on ~ere. If you wmt to the five acre ~at you ~e ~ng to propose a · ' ' e Prese~ation is the ye~ or so ago. That is 800% less l~d ~at you would utfltze. It doesnt m~ sense. mm2a of Sou~old Tom. It is ~e l~t kstoon of a hat,al resource. Don't ~ow it away. ~ you vew much. P~SC~LA HO~: My nme is Priscilla Hor~. I live at 35 Sunset L~e, I wrote a letter, ~d I would like to just t~e pros of it, ~d let people ~derst~d some~ing. We ~e not ag~nst affordable homes, ~d I feel for ~at young muple. I have five ~o~ c~ldren, so I ~ow what it is like for children to find homes, but they have to look at the whole picture of the area. We have Peconic Landing opening up with 200 and some odd people moving in, plus employees, plus we are going to need fire, we going to need police in that area. We have the Shady Lady opening. We have the development that is east of S~ Simeon. It is 54 2-family homes. It is just too much in one area. Maybe if Peconic Landing wasn't there. Maybe if that 54 2-thmily home thing wasn't on the books, then is jusl too much Thc circle is horrem~dotts dm'Jug thc stmnncrtimc xxith just IL'n'N traffic. We have Sttmn~it Estates Lip ill East Marion. They have got 34, 35 homes going m thoro, so NOn leek at this one area that we live in, all oF these projects going on. It is too much, just too much..~s I say, if the other pamial development was not going in I could see it, but not ten, thirteen homes. Put five in there. It xvill he beautilkd. All our wildlifk from Peconic Landing has moved down into our area. Where do they go atter that? Red foxes are in thc neighborhood. We have got ricer in the neighborhood. It is wonderfid. We have the Audubon Society not too far ~om us. There is a migrato~ area for birds. I have two pages of birds that do visit the area. Look at the different projects around us. We are not against the affbrdable homes, but not in this area. There is too many things going on, and it is just going to explode. That is all I have to say. Thank you. COUNCILMAN RICHTER: Ms. Horan? I would just like to add to what you made a statement about Peconic Landing having 200 people moving in there. That is an error. There is going to be 200 full time employees, probably 800 people moving in there. So, you are talking about 1,000 people in that area. BETTY SIEBAN: Betty Sieban, 925 McCann Lane in Greenport. Just to expand on Mrs. Horan's statement. I am very much in favor of affordable housing, and for young people. I am sorry I don't remember this gentleman's name, but this was brought up many times before. I think that is a very good answer to the problem expanding on the housing that we already have. Also, to expand on the overuse of the area as far as the traffic goes. I don't know if the people here tonight know but Rock Cove Estates, which will lie between McCann Lane, and Green Hill is about to begin construction as of April 2002. I understand that McCann Lane will become the entranceway for this development, and that, again, you are going to have construction on Sutton. Now you are going to have the tracks coming down McCann. It is really putting a terrible burden on this area of residence. I think that everything should be considered as far as the burden. McCann is the direct access to this Rock Cove. That project had been discussed over and over again here, and eventually I guess it got passed. Now, they are about to start it. It just seems like people are really not considering the citizens and we are kind of a problem. We are going to have this spring and this summer our children, our roads, the noise, it is going to be a terrible thing. We would like the Board to also consider splitting the burden with Green Hill. I want to give Josh a letter in reference to that. I don't really know what the answer is. I wish we had some clout with the County that we could get these developments to egress onto 48, and not thrown into all our developments, and that would solve a large part of the problem. Thank you. SUPERVISOR HORTON: Are there any other comments from the floor in regard to this public hearing? MARl]EL DOBLER: I just have a question. Will there have to be another public meeting before this is passed if you don't vote on it tonight? SUPERVISOR HORTON: This is a public hearing. The public hearing will be left open. There will be no vote on this, this evening. MARIEL DOBLER: Before you vote, though, will there be another public hearing'? 12 MARIkL SUPERVISOR I IORTON: Any other comments from the ALEX WIPF: Just one question. In the section on aftbrdable housing that the Town has written you mentioned that there should be, or they have chosen to use, that there should be a sewer system and a water supply to aftbrdabl¢ housing, but in their petition MaTine has mentioned it is going to be cesspools. How do we go about this? You have to also allow the cesspools to be put into these ten units, or thirteen? COUNCILMAN ROMANELLI: ']7he Health Department would regulate. ALEX WIPF: Yet the section ibr af~brdable housing of Southold Town states that there should be sewers and water. cOUNCILMAN ROMANELLI: I don't believe it states that it needs to be, or should be. JIM MCMAHON: Jim McMahon, Town of Southold. In the Code if you are going down to half-acre density you are required by Health Department and our Town Code to have half-acre density. If you going down to less than that or quarter-acre density Suftblk County Health Department requires that you hook up both to public water and public sewer, and we don't any projects cun'ently that are hooked up to sewer because the density is half-acre density. EDNA QUATROCHE: My name is Edna Quatroche. I live on Sutton and Sunset Lane. I believe that the lady mentioned something about the criteria about walking distance to the village. I defy anybody to be able to get out and over the Route 48 nine months of the year. So, if that development should go through and there should be children unless we get a traffic light where there have already been fatalities up there, there is not such thing as walking to the village. We have to get in our car, and it is not too sure we are going to be able to make it. So, that is the only comment I have make about the walking distance. We don't walk around here. We ride. JOAN EGAN: Talking about riding, when are we going to get some buses to pick us up whether we are senior citizens or not, so we can ride on our money, tax money. When is that going to happen? Should I hold my breath, or as my grandmother would say, put my hand on my rear end until I do that I would have an everlasting paten Let's see that we get the buses ming. Thank you. SUPERVISOR HORTON: Any other comments on this public hearing? JOE MCCARTHY: Good evening. My name is Joe McCarthy, and I am a life-long Southold resident, and I own Eastern Breezes Real Estate in Southold. For the record I was the broker of record on this piece as many of you know. I have been on the Affordable Housing Committee, previous Supervisor Cochran's Affordable Housing Committee, and we worked on that for approximately two years trying to come up with different avenues to solve the problem of affordable housing. This is one of the sites that we picked. Obviously it is becoming very problematic. I am not here to say it should be or shouldn't be done. What I would say is, that the people here, and other people in this town would give as much energy to trying to solve the affordable housing issue in Southold Town we would have it happeuing with real cstato vadues in Oreeupo~t. Ncws&ty had au article recently where they aze 50~}, iu the last year. Southold Town 38% in the last year. Twenty, tweuty-five percent, everybody is benefiting from that. We don't have the answer yet, but we need to get together and find it, and Supe~isor Horton I know that you said you have some issues, and answers as hr as the affbrdable housing process goes for apartments, etc. I don't thi~ apartments are the only issue here to be addressed. I thi~ we need additional building. Tbis might or might not be the site as I said, but we have lo get together and we have to come up with some answers. The longer we wait the more the window is shrinking. Property values are going sky high in this towu. They m'e going to continue to go sky high. Available laud sites are going to continue to disappear. They are going to be bought, and they are going to be developed, and then the windo~v of opponnnity for the builders, who are willing to build $168,000 houses is going to just vanish. It is not going to happen. It is not going to be here. They are out m~ing money on all kinds of other bigger prQects. They don't have to do it for $I68,000. ~ybody that says $168,000 is not an affordable. I got news for you. That is ve~ affordable, but I would ask anybody that has any issues, constructive, or otherwise, or suggestions, to get to Supe~isor Ho~on with this. Let's get a committee going, and t~ to find some answers here for the problem. Tha~ you. SUPERVISOR HORTON: Any there any other comments from the floor in regard to this public hearing? Anybody that hasn't addressed the Town Board? Alex? ALEX WIPF: Just one final comment in reference to building new. The non-profit organization I mentioned, Community Housing Initiative has actually gone out and bought houses that are not in great shape refurbished them and then sold them back to the public, and I think that would probably be something that would be appropriate. Was it you who spoke? Who spoke up, the young couple, somebody in the back? I am sorry. Please, try to explore this avenue. I don't think we necessarily have to build new. We have an enormous amount of older housing stock that can be refurbished. There is a business here, and it is just being ignored. I have gotten calls from builders. Dave McGahan called me, and he said, that was how he was making his money. He builds new houses as well, but he takes older houses and refurbishes them. The septic systems are in. The water is there. It is a wasted resource unless we seriously consider how we can rebuild older housing. As a matter of fact Pat Acampora said to me, it is exactly what should be done all over the island. There are housing developments that have gotten old that could be refurbished. This incessant need to build new is something that has to be resisted at the Town Board level. I hope that you will listen to Tom Wickham when his Blue Ribbon Commission, and whatever he comes up with in terms with what needs to be built and what doesn't. Thank you. BOB GHOSIO: I am Bob Ghosio. I live on Sunset Land in Greenport, and in deference to Mr. McCarthy's comments while I agree with some of what he said I think that the idea of affordable housing at $168,000 is truly a misnomer. It may be affordable in relationship to the other property values in our town, but it is not affordable to the medium incomes. I think that is where the criteria need to be defined. In relation to this particular project I have to say that ten houses at $168,000, or actually seven house at $168,000, and three at current market value versus only two or three at current market value. It shows me that what the developer is looking to do is maximize profits~ By 14 SUPER\.'ISOI~, HORTON: A ky other comments ti'om this public hearing'? ( l'apc ch~ngcl CATHY MESIANO: This project is not subject to thc al)lnoval o~' any grants li~ln any pul~lic agencies. We are not putting lbrth any hypothetical scenarios that may happen upon which we expect one to make a decision. My first point. On the point of affordable housing, whether we are speaking about this project, or any other project within the Town of Southold I think that there is a responsibility to address the needs of people like the young lady that spoke earlier, and sorry I don't have her name. l have appeared before this Board and the other Boards in this town a number of times, and many of the responses that we get are very similar to this. We think this is a wonderfid idea, but we think you should do it someplace else, and we thimk that affordable housing mad rentals and subdivisions are all wonderful ideas, but you should do it somewhere else. This is your backyard, and that statement really has to be thought about. Who is going to be members of your volunteer fire departments, your volunteer ambulances? Who is going to be teaching in the public schools? Who is going to be the civil servants that work in Town Hall, especially when residences requirements are imposed on those civil servants. The pay scale on the civil service level is not one that would afford people a very luxurious life style. Everybody needs to he somewhere. We are not suggesting anything that conjure up the image of subsidize Section 8 housing, where you have someone call for more police presence. I really think that people need to step back, and look at what is affordable, re-align what your priorities are, and my last point is that we have a set criteria rules that exist today, and this application was submitted on today's set of rules and criteria. I think it would be inappropriate for this Board to say, well, we want to change our mind, and we will think about your application six, eight, ten months down the line when we decide what we really want to do. We have a set of rules and criteria and I think we have made a good attempt at demonstrating that we are in compliance with the intent of those rules, and this is at least a project that should be thought about. We could go in there, and develop it tomorrow with four houses, and we could do it much more profitably than we could at the present ten lot yield, but for reasons that don't need to be discussed the developer has decided to give this opportunity, give this project a shot, and see how it flies. The Town stands to gain by it. SUPERVISOR HORTON: If there are no comments I won't entertain any rebuttals. We have gone back and forth. People are here to state specific information in regard to how they feel about this proposal. If it is not a rebuttal, Jim. JIM DINIZIO: No, it is not a rebuttal. The very reason that you folks entertained the Affordable Housing Committee was that you were going to split these up into small developments, so that you wouldn't impact the school district. Okay? That was one of the statements made concerning this. Now, I am going to tell you, Mayor Kapell has done a marvelous job with affordable housing within the Village of Greenport. Guess what? I have no control over that. Okay? Because I don't live within the Village of Greenport. I have control over what you folks do, and I ask you to consider that. Consider when you look at a density map of Southold Town how dark it is around Greenport. It is blue, because of the amount of density that is within the area. It is not blue anywhere else in this town. Now, maybe it is not in my backyard. I don't know. I don't think it is. For me it is not. For me it is taxes. It has always been taxes. It has always been my school district, most of the time when I stand up here, and that is what it is about today. Which is if you increase the density you increase the amount of children in our school, and yes, we are looking for fireman constantly. We are looking for policeman. We are looking for people to do maintenance, but I can tell you I can't think of a fireman that is in my 15 enough, a~d we llano donc enough in tl~is town fl0r ai%rdable housing thanks to Mayor Kapell, and 1 would ask you to consider that strongly when you consider this application. Thank you. SI PERViSOR IIORT()N: I n~.ov¢ fi'om this public l~earing leaving it opei1. Elizabeth A. Ne;~ Southold Town Clerk COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE JOSEPH T. SANSEVERINO COM~IUN[TY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF COMMUNITY' DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Consortium Municipalities Joseph T. SanseverinO Community Development Director May 16, 2001 · New 2001 Income Limits Enclosed please find the new HUD income limits for the Community Development Block Grant Program and HOME program. These income limits are to be used in your housing rehabilitation, public and senior citizen service programs and other direct benefit activities. The income limits are effective as of May 10, 2001. Please inform you~ staff and public service providers of these new income limits. Should you have any questions, please contact me. JTS:rf Enclosure SUFFOLK cOUNTY CONSORTIUM FY 2001 INCOME LIMITS FY 2001 Median Family Income l-Person 2-Persons 3 -Persons 4-Persons 5~Persons 6~Persons 7-Persons 8~Persons $78,700 $44,100 $50,400 · $56,700 $63,000 $68,000 $73,000 $78,100 $83,100 / ~- yr. xa Co,,~y C/-/gt$ T/~c: (. /-/c2x-1',41~0 Southold Town P;annincl Board GREGORY F. YAKABOSIrd TOWN ATTORNEY KATHLEEN MURRAY ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY PATRICIA A. F][NNEGAN ~SSIS rANT TOWN ATTORNEY · JOSHUA Y. HORTON Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 l~out:e 215 P,O. Box 1179 Southoldi New York 11971-0959 ~¢lephone (631) 765.1939 e-ravJiI: gr eg.yakaboski(~town sou~hold, oy.llS katlfleen.nmrray(~town.~outhold.ny.us patricia fim~egan~}town,southold ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOV~rN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To' From: Date: Re: Valerie Scopaz, TOwn Planner Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Patricia A. Finnegan, Esq. Assistant Town Attorney October 31,2002 MaTine, Inc.- Change of Zone Attached is correspondence from Nelson, Pope & Voorhis together with its enclosure, a letter from NYS OPRHP regarding the MaTine Inc. change of zone (AHD) application. Please review and confirm that SEQRA is complete in this matter, so that the application can be reviewed promptly when the moratorium has concluded. Pat PAF/md attachments cc: Supervisor Horton Town Board Southold Town Planning Board NELSON~POPE & VOORHIS~ LLC CHARLES J VOORHIS, CER AICP · ARTHUR J KOERBER, P.E. * VICTOR BERT, PE JOSEPH R EPIFANIA, RE · ROBERT G NELSONr JR RE, PAUL M RACZ, RL S · THOMAS F LAMBO PE October 28, 2002 Greg F. Yakaboski, Town Attorney Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Route 25 PO Box ! 179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Re: MaTine, Inc. Change of Zone SCTM #1000-35-01-04 NP&V #02008 Dear Greg, As you know, I forwarded the original photographs of the surroundings areas of the above referenced project site to OPRHP for review on October 11, 2002. Attached please find correspondence from OPRHP stating that the residence facing Main Road immediately west of the Ma Tine parcels appears to meet the criteria for inclusion in the State and National Registers of Historic Places and that it is the OPHRHP opinion that "development of the Ma Tine property will have No Adverse Impact on this or other historic resources provided that a vegetative buffer is maintained between the two properties to mitigate potential visual impacts to the historic residence ". Please feel free to call should you have any questions or require further assistance in this matter. CCi Catherine Mesiano, Inc. Sincerely, NELSON, POPE & VOORHIS, LLC Shana M. Lacey ~ O NEW YORK STATE Bernadette Castro New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Field Services Bureau Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Watedord, New York 12188-0189 518-237-8643 Ms. Shana M. Lacey Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747-2188 October 24, ~-~ HELS0 8, POPE Re: SEQRA Ma Tine, Inc., Greenport T/Southold, Suffolk Co. 02PR00998 / NP&V 02008 Dear Ms. Lacey: The Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) has received the additional documentation you provided on this project. As the state agency responsible for the coordination of the State's historic preservation programs, including the encouragement and assistance of local preservation programs, we offer the following comments. Based on the photographs submitted by your October 11th letter, the late~l 9th century residence facing Main Road immediately west of the Ma Tine parcel (SCTM1000-033-005-015) appears to meet the criteria for inclusion in the State and National Registers of Historic Places. It is the OPRHP opinion, however, that development of the Ma Tine property will have No Adverse impact on this or other historic resources provided that a vegetative buffer is maintained between the two properties to mitigate potential visual impacts to the historic residence. The previously submitted Phase 1A/B archeologioal survey by Bernstein et al. for the Ma Tine property has been reviewed; OPRHP concurs with the conclusion of the Bernstein report that further archeological testing is not warranted. If you have any questions regarding this review, please call me at (518) 237-8643, extension 3283. Please refer to the project number (PR) above in any correspondence. Sinc ely, _ j,~'-Iistoric Preservation Program Analyst An Equal ~)pportunity/Affirmative Action Agency GREGORY F. YAKABoSKt TOWN ATTORNEY K~TIiI-LEEN MURRAY ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY PATRICIA A, FINNEGAN ASSISTANT TOWN ATTO1CNEY JOSHUA Y. ~IORTON ~/~ Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southo]d~ New York 11971-0959 q~elephone (631) 765-1939 e-mail: greg.yakaboski@town.southold.ny.us kathleen.murray~towa.~ou(~hold.ny, us patricia, finnegan~town.southold.ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 11,2002 Catherine Mesiano Catherine Mesiano, Inc. 12 Mill Pond Lane East Moriches, N.Y. 11940 RE: Application of MaTine, Inc. for Change of Zone Dear Ms. Mesiano: As you know, I have been reviewing the file in the above referenced Change of Zone application. Please be advised that the following items are outstanding: (1) The NYS OPRHP has requested photographs in conjunction with their review of the Archaeological Survey. You have advised me that you have the photographs and will be sending them. (2) Letter of Availability of water service from SCWA. The confirmation of water availability is required to complete SEQRA, and also required by the Planning Board and the Suffolk County Department of Planning in order for them to consider site plan approval. (3) Confirmation from the Suffolk County Department of Health regarding the capability of the soils to handle the septic systems. (4) The Suffolk County Department of Planning requested an area map depicting land uses and zoning on and within 200 feet of the premises. This request was passed on to you on January 22, 2002. Please confirm that this has been provided to Suffolk County. Lastly, as you may know, there is presently a subdivision moratorium in effect in the Town of Southold. The temporary moratorium is in effect for six (6) months from August 15, 2002, and provides, in part, that the Planning Board - shall not continue review on any application for a subdivision, whether that application was submitted prior to or after the effective date of the law. See Local Page 2 Law No. 3 of 2002. The law provides for a procedure to apply for a waiver from the effect of the moratorium, at Section 6., if you choose to do so. Accordingly, unless you apply for and are granted a waiver, you should not expect to have the conclusion of the public hearing or a Planning Board recommendation before February 2003. If the above requested information can be provided in the interim, we will endeavor to act on your application as promptly as possible once the moratorium has concluded. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, PF/md bc: Supervisor Horton Town Board Planning Board Jim McMahon GREGORY F. YAKABOSKI TOWN ATTORNEY JOSHUA Y. HORTON ~ Supervisor ~ Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1889 gr eg.yakaboski@town.sout hold.ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 20, 2002 Chic Voorhis Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747 Re: MaTine, Inc. - Request for Change of Zone SCTM #1000-35-1-4 Dear Chic: I am enclosing the following in regard to MaTine, Inc. - Request for Change of Zone in the Town of Southold: · Copy of letter to Mary Wilson, Asst. Town Attorney from Catherine Messiano dated May 9, 2002 · Copy of letter to John Hurtado from Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President, Board of Trustees dated May 7, 2002 · Spiral-bound Stage I Archeological Survey prepared May 2002 Please review and respond. Thank you. encs. cc: Catherine Mesiano w/o encs. Planning Department w/o encs. Very truly yours, /~;~gnO,~eeay~ o s k i, Esq. Southold Town P/anning Boarcl CATHERINE MESIANO, INC. 12 MILL POND LANE EAST MORICHES, NY 11940 631-878-8951 May 9, 2002 Mary Wilson, Asst. Town Attorney Town of Southold Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: MaTine, Inc. Request for change of Zone Dear Ms. Wilson: In response to your letter of March 26, 2002, enclosed please review the following: 1. Stage I Archeological survey. Please forward to Nelson Pope & Voorhis for their review. 2. Town Trustees letter of non-jurisdiction. 3. The SCWA availability letter is still pending. We will notify you as soon as it becomes available. 4. Rates for affordable housing are mandated by Southold Town and other municipal requirements. Very truly yours, Catherine Mesiano, President Enclosures Cc: Planning Department HAY 1 8 2U~~ $outhold Town Planning Board JOSHUA y. I-IORTON SUPERVISOR OFFICE OF THE SUPERVISOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-1823 Telephone (631) 765-1889 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MEMORANDUM VALERLE SCOPAZ, AICP, TOWN PLANNER SUPERVISOR JOSHUA HORTON APRIL 30, 2002 MATINE CHANGE OF ZONE: STATUS OF APPLICATION Please advise as to status of the above-referenced application for a change of zone (to AHD). In particular, an update on the environmental/SEQRA components and whether the applicant has submitted all requested information would be helpful. In addition, it has been raised that an older survey indicated that test wells had already been performed on the property yet recently there was additional test well performed. Please clarify this issue as well. Thank you for your attention to this matter. ~¥ 0 I~ 2~2 r,~ $outhold Town Planning Board M~ Valerie Scopaz Senior Town Planner Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 V~a Fa~ 631-765-1~2~ Ret Affordable Ho~_sing Application, C, ree~ort, New York Suffolk Count~l Tax Map # 1000.035-1-4 Dea~ Valero: 2O02 Southoid Town P/am Board I recently had a nice chat with Martin Trent of the Suffolk Coun .~m;ng ~ne a./ acre parcel o~ winch the osed A ordable Ho~si~e tndl~ prop ~ff~ -~ Deoelopmmt would be Specifically, we dtsc~esed in some detail the flow of water eneering the drainage sumps (one of · ~y,~,,~.. rnc rjje.~r o] rms traverse of waver on any septic systems which might be installed on the property if this application were approved. A significant volume of water rushes through these sumpsfyom several primary neighborhood ~ j. ~. rrre o / steps netg~ornood, although it is not clear where the water ~oes once it raters the property m qnestlo~ - As the Planning Board indicated in. its initial Report regarding this Application, tke~e may be a freshwater wooded wetland on tkts Iooper~y. That has yet to be determined, but the property does indeed abut (within a 1009 a large fres..hwater wooded wetland on the other side of Count~l Road 48~ Martin Trent and I discussed the poss~bili,.hd, that the coursing of this water might find its walt into t, he..se wet.lands.. A.l~.or~n. tly the most clef in,tire way to determine the ultimate outcome of th,flow ts ro employ a nyarotogtst to undertake a thoroughgoing am~lysis. sW~. .. . is this important? Because the flow of the water may have a direct bearing on whether any ep?c systems can b. e located on this site and, if so, ?.ow many and where. Barring proper analysis aha a complete understanding.of the soil's permeability, it is possible that the incorrect placement of septic systems could move to,dc affluence right into these fragile freshwater wetla~le. I am sure ~lou are aware that the Application currently before the Town Board is riddled with conflicting information, missions and inaccuracies regarding the number of homes to be built on the site, where they will be located, and whether accessory apartments will be include& Moreover, I woefu~;y maaequate m addressing these timely concerns. ~v~r .ma. ny.as thirteen- homes have been proposed in the Applica~on, ten of which are to be affordable_ ~,-~u~ resmenrs on rnts propers. :~uck density might indeed aver stress the lwnd. l feel it would be ~prf~...t for the Town of $outhold to employ a hydrologist to investigate these ma..t~__tn__deta_ it Fmlmg thab the developer, Ma Tine, Im:, could be directed to do so. In addition, ~ the s.£~.~. ~pro.cess ~.fo. lda, Martin Trent indicated that Walter Daunjdtak o the Health n might be t.?. r. mon ? answer quemone g rd ng the reloao h r ~.~,~,~=n w~vr/tow aha septic a]ftuence, tlejurther indicated that the Department's Division of ev astewater Management could be approached ,,~.rdin~ the ~-~-ibili~-. n-~ -' ......... '~ S~lstem$. . ~- ~ j~.,~ ,~ ptacemenv septic Finally, of particular interest, it made sense to Martin Trent that the la~ of the land in relation to the gradient, the size of the parcel and the land's unique drainage features may be the primary reasons why the parcel has never been develope~ Our neighborhood appreciates the ~. .o. rt that the Planning Board made in providing a preliminary report t.o the Town Board at ghe Public Hearing. We hope that many of the preliminary questions _raised m that report and those l.'ve raised above will be answered as this proc~s unfold& As yon know, the Public Heating remains open, although the Town Board did indicate at its meeting on Thursday, the 25th, that it w. ould o.n~. e ago. in publically review this Application on Tuesday, May 7tla I hope that this upcoming meeting unll further clarify these concerns both for the public and for the Board members themselves. Thanks again for all yostr efforts. Victor Brown Submission Withou! a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTbI#: 1000- D~e: ~/~/0~ ~F 1_? -o72 ,.~,'~ ,d,.~ (_. / ,,d ~O . Southold Town P,,.,.n,ng Board FROM :C MESIANO INC. FAX NO. :651-878-8951 Mar. 27 2002 01:22PM P1 GREGORy F. YAKABOSKI TOWN ATTORNEY MARY C. WILSON A.$SISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY JOSHUA Y, HORTON ~'k~per~r/~or Town Hall, 63095 l:~oute 25 P,O. Box 1179 Southold, Now York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1889 ~g. yak~o~i~u~,~uchold.ny.u~ m~. ~l~n ~wn. ~outk~d.ny.~ OFFICE OF THE TO~ ATTO~y TO~ OF SOUTHOLD March 26, 2002 Cathy Messiano Cathy Iviesziano, Inc. 12 Mill Pond Lane East Mor/ches, New York 11940 I~E: Ma Tine Inc. reo31est for changc of zone (AHD) Dear Ms. Messlana: As agent for the Ma Tin~ Inc., I am writing to you to request some o4ditional information that is neccssmy in order to make a full review of the application and to fulfill the SEQRA requisitcs. 1. Apparently, the site lies wiXhin one mile of an archaeological site (confu~l by OPRH-P) nncl a Stagc I Cukural Resource Aascesmcnt is requ/r~i. 2, A letter of non-jurisdiction from the Town Trusr~es regarding any w~nlands.. 3. Provide confirmation that ther~ is an availabl~ wa~r supply for the project th~m the SCWA. 4, Indicate t~ nv. es for affordable housing ..,t th~ mechanism(s) to assu~ homes rcmaia affordable. Thank you for your attention to the above matters. Please contact our office should you have any questions regarding this ~quest. Assistant Town Attorney cc: Supervisor Horton and Town Board Hugh Eugene Drumm Evelyn ~1. Drumm P.O. Box 504 59 Sunset Lane Greenport, New York 11944 August 22, 2001 Southold Town Board P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Proposed development of Sunset Court at the intersection of Sunset Lane and Sutton Place in Greenport Dear Members of the Board: In 1955 we purchased property and built our home at 59 Sunset Lane in Greenport. At the time when we purchased our property, I was told by the realtor that there was a drainage sump at the South End of Sunset Lane to receive the rainwater from Sunset Lane. This sump is listed as the property of Southold Town on an original surveyor's drawing by Otto W, Van Tuyl and Son Licensed Surveyors dated March 31, 1952 for Edna A. Brown and Sam Levine. If the drainage sump is going to become part of an extension of Sunse~ Lane in the proposed Sunset Court project, the water from the road will not have anywhere to drain and become a ba?ard at the intersection of Sunset Lane and Sutton Place. Over the course of our 45 years on Sunset Lane, we have never had a problem with water or ice on the road due to the presence of the drainage stop. Please take this condition into consideration as you review the proposed project. Sincerely, Hugh E. Drumm Evelyn A. Drumm P~LANNING BOARD MEMB BENNETT ORLOWSK/, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KI~NNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 To~vn Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Memorandum To: Joshua Horton, Supervisor and Members of the Town Board From: Valerie Scopaz, AICP, Town Planner Bennett Oflowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board Re: Ma Tine, Inc. Located on the North side of CR 48, approximately 265' west of Sound Road, Greenport, NY SCTM # 1000-035-1-4 Date: March 25, 2002 Proposal: This petition is to change the zone of a 5.53 acre parcel from R-40 Residential to AHD - Affordable Housing Density. It is unclear whether the applicant proposes to construct ten or thirteen homes because the map, the environmental assessment form and the application present conflicting information. The discrepancies have been brought to the attention of the Town Attorney's Office and to the best of our understanding, the applicant's attorney has been asked to resolve them. However, this information was not received by this office in time to be included in this report, which, at the Town Board's request, is being prepared in advance of its March 26, 2002 public hearing. Requirements: The purpose of the AHD district, as defined in the Southold Town Zoning Code, is "to provide the opportunity within certain areas of the town for the development of high- density housing for families of moderate income." According to the formula set forth in the Zoning Code in Chapter 100, Article V., the income limits for eligible applicants to purchase one of these homes ranges from $44,100 for a single person to $83,100 for a family of eight people. The recommended ceiling on home prices offered within the AHD district is $168,000. It should be noted that this limit is lower than the maximum sales price for affordable housing pursuant to Suffolk County's guidelines ($237,500). (Source: James McMahon, Community Development Director, March 21, 2002) The provisions of the AHD district, as set forth in Chapter 100, Article V. require that the subject property lie within one fourth of a mile of the boundaries of the incorporated Village of Greenport. The intent of the Zoning Code is that higher density housing be located within or near hamlet centers. This property lies between 1200 and ~300 feet north of the Village's boundary, less than a quarter ora mile. The provisions of the AHD district also require that where the subject property is less than 5 acres in area, the applicant shall agree to reserve at least 40% of the dwelling units or lots for sale or lease to moderate income families. The applicant proposes to reserve 70% of the units for moderate income. Further, the applicant offers to restrict the potential total square footage of the remaining 30 The subject lot is zoned R-40, which would permit the theoretical construction of 4 to ,5 dwelling units. If granted, the petition would allow at least a doubling of the allowable density to 10 lots. Environmental Issues: A preliminary review of the materials submitted for this petition indicate that a portion of the property may contain a freshwater wooded wetland, and if so, this portion would lie within the jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees. Further, the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Histodc Preservation has determined that this site may be archeologically sensitive. The ability of the Suffolk County Water Authority to service the proposed project is not known. Nor is the capability of the Soils to handle septic systems as per Suffolk County Department of Health Service standards. The potential impact on traffic of five to six additional homes over what could be built under the current zoning normally would not be expected to be significant. However, due to the existing traffic congestion and hazards found at the nearest intersection, coupled with the unknown impact of the recently upgraded Shady Lady Restaurant and Hotel on the northeast comer of SR 25 and Sound Road, this issue requires more information and analysis. Before an environmental determination is made, referral of this petition to the Board of Trustees for their Input is recommended. Also, a Stage 1 Cultural Resource Assessment should be conducted by the applicant and a report submi~ed to the State and the Town for review. Input of the Suffolk County Water Authority and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services should be obtained as part of the coordinated environmental review of this project pursuant to SEQR. A review of the traffic situation at the intersection of Sound Road and SR 25 should be undertaken. Recommendations: There is insufficient information to render a recommendation. Planning Board will not comment further on this specific application until the above-noted information is submitted and reviewed pursuant to SEQR. Finally, for the past several years, the Planning Board has strongly recommended that the AHD legislation be revised because it does not adequately address the affordable housing issue. Therefore, the Planning Board will not recommend changing any property to this designation until the key deficiencies of the existing legislation are redressed. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIA~qO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Elizabeth A. Neville, Southold Town Clerk Victor L'Eplattenier, Senior Plan~ March 18,2002 NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Correspondence Archaeological and Historical Sensitivity Attached please find correspondence from Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC, pertaining to five sites, two of which are affordable housing sites currently under review for proposed zoning changes to AHD. This correspondence is being forwarded to you for your attention and any recommendations the Town Board may have regarding these sites. From: Date: Re: FAX COVER SHEET Victor LaPlatnea 765-1823 Shana Lacey March 11, 2002 NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Correspondence No. of Pages: 12 (including Cover) Comments: Victor, Attached please find the correspondence from NYS OPRHP with regard to archaeological and historical sensitivity on the following parcels/projects: 1. Zoumas, Bayview 2. Fomstbrook, Bgyview 4. Skrezic, Peconic 5. Mattituck Housing, Mattimck Please feel free to call should you have any questions or require any additional information. Siucerely, Shana JAMES C. McMAHON Administrator Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 Town Hall, 53095 Main o~a~ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OFFICE MEMO To: From: Subject: Date: Ben Orlowski, Chairman, Southold Planning Board Jim McMahon, Executive Assistant AHD Projects March 21, 2002 I noted in todays Suffolk Times that they listed the proposed selling price of affordable housing units at "around $265,000". Please note for the record, that this is NOT the case. The Affordable Housing Committee recommended a maximum sales price of $168,000. The current Suffolk County Affordable Housing limit is $237,500 and the AH Committee felt that this was too high. If you have any questions on the above, please give me a call. cc: Southold Town Board PIAR g 1 2002 Southold TOwn Planning Board ELIZABETH A. NEVII,I,E TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFOP~VIATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 13, 2001 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Town Board of the Town of Southold will hold a public hearing at 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 26, 2002 on the enclosed proposed Change of Zone Application, Petition No. 319 of Ma Tine, Inc. requesting change of zone from R-40 Residential District to AHD Affordable Housing District on property located at Greenport, New York. Please sign the duplicate copy of this letter and return to me in the enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope. Thank you. Southold Town Clerk Attachments CC~ Suffolk County Department of Planning Long Island State Park Commission Village of Greenport Town of Shelter Island Town of Riverhead Town of Southampton Southold Town Planning Boardj Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Harming Board Sign~'t~r~, Re~3ed By ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS 1V~ANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD March 13, 2001 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Town Board of the Town of Southold will hold a public hearing at 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, March 26, 2002 on the enclosed proposed Change of Zone Application, Petition No. 319 of Ma Tine, Inc. requesting change of zone from R40 Residential District to AHD Affordable Housing District on property located at Greenport, New York. Please sign the duplicate copy ofth/s letter and return to me in the enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope. Thank you. Eli~oeth A. Neville~ Southold Town Clerk Attachments cc: Suffolk County Department of Planning Long Island State Park Commission Village of Greenport Town of Shelter Island Town of Riverhead Town of Southampton Southold Town Planning Boardb,'~'' Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department HAR :L i 2002 outhold Tow Planning 8ozrd LEGAL NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING V-146 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold has received a petition to amend the Zoning Map of the Town of Southold by changing the Zoning D/strict designation of SCTM # 1000-035.00-01.00-004.000 from the Low Density Residential (R~40) to the Affordable Housing District (AHD). NOTICE IS HEREBy FURTHER GIVEN that pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, the Town Board of the Town of Southold will hold a PUBLIC HEMtlNG on the Aforesaid LOCAL LAW at the SOUTHOLD TOWN HAI,L~ 53095 Main Road~ Southold~ New York at 5:00 p.m, Tuesday~ March 26~ 2005. The purpose of the Local Law is to Change the Zoning District Designation of SCTM # 1000-035.00-01.00- 004.000 from the Low Density Residential (R-40) to the Affordable Housing District Designation. The petitioner for this request is MaTine Inc.. The legal description of the aforesaid property is as follows: All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being near Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York and bounded and described as follows: Beginning at a point on the northerly line of the North Road which point of beginning is the southwesterly comer of the premises herein described and the southeasterly comer of lands now or formerly ofEhzabeth T. Albertson and others; running thence northerly along the easterly line of lands now or formerly of Elizabeth T., Albertson and others to the southerly line of lands now or formerly of Dorothy Barstow; thence easterly along the southerly line of lands last mentioned and lands now or formerly of Herbert Fordham to the westerly line of Sound Road or Avenue; thence southerly along the westerly line of Sound Road to lands now or formerly of Whitney; thence westerly and again southerly along the aforementioned lands to lands now or formerly of Kszyminski; thence westerly and again southerly along lands last mentioned to the northerly line of the North Road; thence westerly along the northerly line of the North Road to the point or place of the BEGINNING. DESIGNATION OF SCTM # 1000-035.00-01.00-004.000 FROM THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-40) TO THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING DISTRICT ( HD)". Copies of this Local Law are available in the Office of the Town Clerk to any interested persons during regular business hours. Any persons desiring to be heard on the proposed amendment should appear, and has the right to appear, at the t/me and place above so specified. Any person also has the right to submit written comments to the Southold Town Clerk either prior to the Public Hearing or at the Public Heating. BY ORDER OF THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK. Dated: February 26, 2002 Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk Copies to the following: The Suffolk Times Town Board Members Town Attorney Planning Board Catherine Mesiano Ma Tine, Inc. Catherine E. Tasker Abigail Wickham, Esq. Town Clerk Bulletin Board PLANNIi~G BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSK/, JR. Chairman V~ILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: From: Elizabeth A. Neville, Southold Town Clerk Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chai~ Southold Town Planning Boar~,/ Date: March 11,2002 Re: 3/5/02 FOIL Request or Melanie Norden Ma Tine Inc, SCTM: 1000-035-01 Transmitted herewith is correspondence pertaining to this matter, received from Jim McMahon on February 20th, 2002 answering questions the Planning Board asked regarding the location of applicants for the affordable housing program. The rest of our file contains copies of the applications and supporting material forwarded to the Planning Board by your office. JAMES C. McMAHON Administrator Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 ~fiwn Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OFFICE MEMO To: From: Southold Planning Board Jim McMahon Subject: Date: Affordable Housing Subdivisions February 20, 2002 I have examined the files on our AHD subdivisions and reviewed the current property owners and noted the following: North Fork Hou~inE Alliance/Town of~gonthold' 14 units All units were sold to families in Category A. 3 units have been resold, at prices under the prescribed AHD Limits ~xlar_figlllg_39 units 3 units were sold to those in Category C (This was due, in part, to three AHD projects coming on the market at the same time). 5 units have resold since 1989. 4 units sold in the price range of $116,000 to $118,000, 1 unit sold in 2000 for $160,000. HiEhpoint Meadows: 27 units All units soldto families in Category A 5 units have resold since 1990 ~a~dd__~: 33 units All units were sold to families in Category A 2 units have resold, as a result of job relocation (1) and divorce (1) Elijah'a l,ane E~tate~s: 20 units All units sold to families in Category A, No units have resold If you have any questions on the above, please give me a call. ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Southold Town Planning Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Attorney Elizabeth A. Neville, Southold Town Cler~. March 5, 2002 3/5/02 FOIL Request of Melanie Norden ltouthold Town Planning Transmitted herewith is a FOIL request of Melanie Norden. Please respond to this office, in writing, within five (5) business days. Thank you. NOTE: Ms. NOrden has received a copy fo the application with the Notice to Adjacent Property Onwers, Assessment Form, and maps/survey, so there is no nedd for you to supply those records. ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency Freedom of Information Officer). One copy will be returned to you in response to your request, or as an interim response. (Department or Officer, if known, that has the information you are requesting.) ' RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: {Describe the record sought. If poss~le; supply date, file title, tax map number, and any other pertinent information.) ..... Apphcant. Mailing Address (if different from above): Telephone Number: ~31~' 4"~'). ~-q Iq Date: [ ] APPROVED [ ] APPROVED WITH DELAY* [ ] Elizabeth A. NevJllA Freedom of Information Officer * If delayed or denied see reverse side for explanation. DENIED* RECEIVED e Southold Town Clerk M~R-12-2002 11:~9 NELSON ~ POPE,LLP 5!6 n27 562~ P.OI×ll ~, VOOi=iHiS, I L~ ~ Fax: From: Date: Re: FAX COVER SHEET Victor LaPlatnea 765-1823 Shana Lacey March 11, 2002 NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and I-Iistoric Preservation Correspondence No. of Pages: 12 (including Cover) Comments: Victor, Attached please find the correspondence from NYS OPRHP with regard to archaeological and historical sensitivity on the following parcels/projects: 1. Zounms, Bayview 2. Forestbrook, Bayview 4, Skrczic, Peconic 5. Mattimck Housing, Mattituck Please feel free to call should you have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, Shana M~-12-2002 11:10 NELSON [ POPE,LLP 516 42? 5620 P.04×11 New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Pres¢~ation Historic Preservation Fierd Services Bureau ' Peebles Island, PO Box 189, Waterford, New York 12188-0189 518-257-8643 March 6, 2002 Shana M. Lacey Nelson, Pope & Voorhis. LLC 572 Walt V~nnan Road Melville, New York 11747-2185 Deer Ms. Lacey: NELSON & POPE Re: SEQRA Ma Tine/Greenpon North of' No~r,h Road/ SCTM #1000-35-01-04 Southold, Suffolk County 02PR0998 Thank you for reques~/ng the commcms of the Office of Perk~, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPIZRP) concerning your project's potential impact/effect upon historic and'or prehistoric cultural resources. Our staff has reviewed the documentation that you provldcfl on your project. Prelirn./na~ comments and/or requests for addltiona information are noted on sepera:c enc'.,o~ures accompanym$ this letter. A determination of impact/effect will be provided only after ALL documentation requirements noted on any enclosures ~ve been met. Any questions concenfing our prelim/nary comments and/or requests for additional information should be directed to the appropriate staff person identified on each enclosure. In c~ses where a state agency is involved in ~his unden:aldng, it is appropriate ~ur that agency :o determine whether conse/tation should take place with OPtLHP under Section 14.09 of the New York State Perks, P. eereation and Historic Preservation Law. In addition, if there is any fedezal agency involvement Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's rcgulat/ons, "Protection of Historic and Cultural Properties" 36 CPR $00 requires that agency to initiate consultation with thc State }tistofic Prese~'ation Officer (SKPO). When respcndMg, please be sure ~o refer to the OPP~tP Project Review (PR) number noted above. Sincerely, Director RLP:bsd Enclosure(s) An Equal 0pportunRy/A~rmefive A~cn Agency M~-12-20B2 22:1B NELSON & POPE,LLP 5iS 42? 5620 P.05×ll ARCliEOLOGY COMME~rs 02PR099~ Based on reported resources/there is an archeologicsl site in or adjacent to your project area. Therefore the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) recommends that a Phase I archeological survey is warranted for ali portions of the project to involve ground disturbance, unless substantial prior ground disturbance can be documented. If you consider the project area to be disturbed, documentation of the disturbance will need to be reviewed by OPRHP. Examples of disturbance include mining activities and multiple episodes of building construction and demolition. A Phase I survey is designed to determine the presence or absence of archeological sites or other cultural resources in the project's area of potential effect. The Phase 1 survey is divided into two progressive units of study including a Phase lA sensitivity assessment and initial project area field inspection, and a Pha.~e lB subsurface testing program for the project area. The OPRHP can provide standards for conducting cultural resource investigations upon request. Cultural resource surveys and survey reports that meet these standards will be accepted and approved by the OPRHP. Our office does not conduct.cultural resources surveys. A 36 CFR 61 qualified archeologist should be retainvxt to conduct the Phase i survey. Many archeological consulting firms advertise their availability in the yellow pages. The services of qualified archeologists can also be obtained by contacting local, regional, or statewide professional archeologicaI organizations. Phaze 1 surveys can be expected to vary in cost per mile of right-of-way or by the number of acres impacted. We encourage you to contact a number of consulting firms and compare examples of each firm's work to obtain the best product. Documentation of ground disturbance should include a description of the disturbance with confirming evidence. Confirmation can include current photographs and/or older photographs of the project area which illustrate the disturbance (approximately keyed to a project area map), past maps or site plans that accurately record previous disturbances, or current soil borings that verify past disruptions to the land. Agricultural activity is not considered to be substantial ~ound disturbance and many sites have been identified in previously cultivated land. If you have any questions concerning archeology, please call biike Schifferli at (518) 237-8643 ext. 3281. M. Schifferli 03/01/02 ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Southold Town Planning Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Attorney Elizabeth A. Neville, Southold Town Cler~) March 5, 2002 3/5/02 FOIL Request of Melanie Norden 2002 SouthoId Town I l nnlng Board Transmitted herewith is a FOIL request of Melanie Norden. Please respond to this office, in writing, within five (5) business days. Thank you. NOTE: Ms. NOrden has received a copy fo the application with the Notice to Adjacent Property Onwers, Assessment Form, and maps/survey, so there is no nedd for you to supply those records. ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-J_823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency Freedom of Information Officer). One copy will be returned to you in response to your request, or as an interim response. (Department or Officer, if known, that has the information you are requesting.) RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: (Describe the record sought. If possiJ~le .sup date, file title, tax map number, and any other pertinen,t information.) ~ e ~e ~ 2~ ~ p~ sc~ ~ooo-o3~.~-o,.~_ . oo~.ooo Address: Mailing Address (if different from above): Te,ep~one ~umbe~: [ ] APPROVED [ ] APPROVED WITH DELAY* [ ] DENIED* Eliz~ th A. Nevill& -- Freedom of Information Officer RECEIVED '"'~' ' Da'~ ,ruv£ Southold Town Clerk * If delayed or denied see reverse side for explanation. SECTION II. (For use by Freedom of Information Officer only.) Your request has been DENIED or the reason(s) check below: [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Confidential Disclosure Part of Investigatory Files Unwarranted Invasion of Privacy Record of which this agency is legal custodian, Record is not'Maintained by this Agency but cannot be found Exempted by Statute other than the Freedom of Information Act Other (specify): Your request is ACKNOWLEDGED. There will be a delay in supplying the requested record until Reason for delay: SECTION III. RIGHT TO APPF_AL YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO APPEAL A DENIAL OF THIS APPLICATION IN WRITING WITHIN Z0~DAYS OF THE DENIAL. CONTA(~T THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD (see below). THE TOWN BOARD MUST RESPOND TO YOU IN WRITING WITHIN TEN BUSINESS DAYS OF RECEIPT OF YOUR APPEAL. Southold Town Board Southold Town Hall $309S Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Telephone: (516) 765-1800 Mehmie Norden 1550 McCttnn l~ne Greenpoet, New YorA 11944 631-477-4914 (Pkone) 631.477-365S (Fax) March 5, 2002 Mr. Bennett OrloskL Jr., Chairman Town of SouthoM Planning Board Town Hall- Route 25 Southold, New York Dear Mr. Orloski: The 67 Steps Association, an association of property owners some of whose properties abut the proposed Affordable HouMng project in Greenport, New York (SCTM #1000-035.00- 01.00-004. 000), wouM like to study the Planning Board's Review on this AHD application prior to the Public Hearing scheduled for March 26, 2002 at 5:00p. m. A resolution of the Town Board on December 11, 2001 referred this Application to the PBfor its review. We are not sure on what date you received it but, as indicated in the Codebook, "within six.tv (60) days from the date of the Planning Board meeting at which such referral is received, the Planning Board shah report its recommendations to the Town Board." We presume that the sixty days have now expired and the PB's Review is available. Our Association trusts that the PB will.fulfill its obligations with respect to this AHD application. We request that you take the review seriously and perform your role in a thorough and timely manner and that your Report be available for public inspection well before March 26, 20(12. We hope that you will give ample consideration to the Town Master Plan, the existing and permitted land uses in the area, the relationship of the proposed design and locations qf the buildings on the site, tra.~c circulation, both on and qff the site, the adequacy and availabili~' qf community facilities and utilities, including pteblic water and public sewer systems, to service the proposed development, as well as the impact qf Rock Ridge, the Shady Lady and Peconic Landing on this proposal. As registered voters and tax payers we rely on the PB for expert guidance in this arena. The PB has been charged with a signOqcant public responsibility - we trust that our Jbith in you as elected t~l~qcials has not been misplaced, i have filed the necessar3.~ Freedom of lnfi~rmation papers. Please let me know when your review is available. Melanie Norden 1550 McCann Lane Greenport, New York 11944 631-477-4914 (Phone) 651-477-$68# (Fax) March 5, 2002 Mr. Bennett Orloski, Jr., Chairman Town of $outhoM Planning Board Town Hall- Route 25 $outhold, New York Dear Mr. Orloski: The 67 Steps ,4ssociation, an association of property owners some of whose properties abut the proposed Affordable Housing project in Greenport, New York (SCTM #1000-035.00- 01.00-004. 000), would like to study the Planning Board's Review on this AHD application prior to the Public Hearing scheduled.for March 26, 2002 at 5:00p. m. A resolution of the Town Board on December 11, 2001 referred this Application to the PBfor its review. We are not sure on what date you received it but, a,, indicated in the Codebook, "within sixty (60) days from the date of the Planning Board meeting at which such referral is received, the Planning Board shah report its recommendations to the Town Board." We presume that the sixty days have now expired and the PB's Review is available. Our Association trusts that the PB will fulfill its obligations with respect to this ~4HD application. We request that you take the review seriously and perform your role in a thorough and timely manner and that your Report be available for public inspection well before March 26, 2002. We hope that you will give ample consideration to the Town Master Plan, the existing and permitted land uses in the area, the relationship of the proposed design and locations of the buildings on the site. trq~l°tc circulation, both on and off the site, the adequacy and availability qf community facilities and utilities, including public water and public sewer systems, to service the proposed development, as well as the impact of Rock Ridge, the Shady Lady and Peconic Landing on this proposal. As registered voters and tax payers we rely on the PB fi>r expert guidance in this arena. The PB has been charged with a significant public responsibility - we trust that our faith in you as elected officials has not been misplaced. ! have filed the necessa~. Freedom t~f lnfi~rmation papers. Please let me know when .Four review is available. ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTR~,R OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Mai~ R°ad P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: January 7, 2002 Southold Town PlannJl B Board Transmitted is proposed change of zone petition no319 of MA TINE 1NC. for a change of zone from R-40 Low Density Residential District to AHD Affordable Housing District on property located at Greenport, New York, SCTIVlg 1000-~5-1-4. Please prepare an official report defining the Planning Board's recommendations with regard to this proposed change of zone and forward same to me. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk Enclosure cc: Town Board Town Attorrmy ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 837 OF 2001 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF TgllE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON DECEMBER 4, 2001: WltEREAS a petition has been received from Ma Tine, Inc. for a change of zone from R-40, Low Density Residential to AHD Affordable Housing District (AI-ID) on a certain property located no~h of County Route 48~ Greenperh New York and identified as SCTl~1000-35.. 01-04; now therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Town Clerk be and she hereby is authorized and directed to tran.~mit this petition to the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk County Department of Planning for their recommendations and reports, all in accordance with the Southold Town Code and the Suffolk County Charter. Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 838 OF 2001 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON DECEMBER 4, 2001: WHEREAS Ma Tine, Inc., has proposed a chanee in zone for the property identified a.q SCTM#1000-35-01-04 consisfin~ of approximately 5.7 acres 1oo~*~ on the north side of County Routen Greenport, New York; and WI~EREAS the proposed change of zone is from Low-Density Residential (R40) to Affordable Honsing District (AHD); therefore be it RESOLVED that the Town Board of Southold hereby declares itself lead agency as there are no other involved agencies, in regard to SEQRA; therefore be it RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby finds this to be an UNLISTED action pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Reltnlation~ Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT Ti~F~ FOLLOWING RESOLUTION NO. 839 OF 2001 WAS ADOPTED AT THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ON DECEMBER 4, 2001: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby engages the professional services of Nelson, Pope & Voorhis to perform the SEQRA review for the proposed change of zone from r-40, low density residential to AHD affordable Housing District (AHD) on a certain property located north of Count3, Route 48~ Greenportn New York and identified as SCTMO1000-35-01-04 Elizabeth A. Neville Southold Town Clerk RECEIVED PETITION NO. ,,~ lq STATE OF NEW YORK TOWN OF 8OUTHOLD OCT 1 9 2001 Southold Town Clerl'. PETITION IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF MA TINE INC. contract vendee of CATHERINE E. TASKER FOR A CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, NEW YORK. TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD: 1. I, CHRISTINE C. HURTADO, PRESIDENT of MA TINE, INC. residing at 10995 NORTH BAYVIEW ROAD.SOUTNOLD Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the contract vendee of certain real property situated at 69125 C.R. 48, GREENPORT NY, and more particularly bounded and described as follows: see SCHEDULE "A" attached 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk. County, New York, including the Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: FROM THE CURRENT ZONING OF LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-40) DISTRICT TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING (AHD) DISTRICT. 3. Such a request is made for the following reasons: APPLICANT WISHES TO SUBDIVIDE THE PREMISES INTO TEN LOTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 8OUTHOLD TOWN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM. PROPOSED COVENANTS, WHICH WOULD PROVIDE FOR CONSTRUCTION AND SALE OF AFFORDABLE HOMES ON SUCH LOTS ARE PROPOSED. THE THREE REMAINING LOTS WOULD NOT BE WITHIN AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM, BUT WILL BE RESTRICTED BY DEED COVENANT TO A MAXIMUM LIVABLE AREA OF 2500 SQUARE FEET, IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROPOSED COVENANTS. THE NEED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON THE NORTH FORK HAS BEEN WELL DOCUMENTED. THE SITE IS WELL SITUATED TO MEET THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE ZONING CODE FOR THE AHD DISTRICT, AS IT IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY % MILE FROM THE BOUNDARY OF THE VILLAGE OF GREENPORT. THE AREA IN WHICH THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED CONSISTS OF LOTS CONTAINING AS LITTLE AS 5,500 SQUARE FEET TO 22,000 SQUARE FEET. THIS PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CONCEPTS SET FORTH IN THE AHD CRITERIA IN THAT IT'S IMPLEMENTATION WILL CREATE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING FOR FAMILIES OF MODERATE INCOME AND PERMIT A MIX OF HOUSING TYPES AND LEVEL OF RESIDENTIAL DENSITY APPROPRIATE TO THE GREENPORT AREA. THE PROPOSED PROJECT FULFILLS THE STATED PURPOSE OF ARTICLE V OF THE ZONING CODE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. CHRISTINE C. HURTADO STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CHRISTINE C. HURTADO, BEING DULY SWORN, deposes and says that she is the petitioner in the within action; that he has read the foregoing Petition and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to her own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and that as to those matters he believe it to be true. Sworn to. before me this /~/~-' day of ~ // ,2001 Notary Public- - DONNA M. CflITUK MA TINE INC. This request is for a rezoning approval from the Southold Town Board from Low Density Residential (R-40) District To Affordable Housing (AHD) District. The subject property is a 5.7-acre parcel located at 69125 C.R. 48, Greenport, also know as Suffolk County Tax Map # 1000-35-1-4. The density allowed under the proposed change of zone would result in the creation of twenty-four 10~000 square foot lots. It is the intention of the developer to limit the yield to 10 lots of approximately 15,000 scluare feet each and create a natural buffer of 1.5 acres. Ten of the lots are to be offered under the provisions of the Town of Southold Affordable Housing Program covenants which would provide for construction and sale of affordable homes on such lots are proposed, The three remaining lots would not be within an affordable housing program, but will be restricted by deed covenant to a maximum livable area of 2500 square feet, in accordance with proposed covenants. The need for affordable housing on the North Fork has been well documented. The site is well situated to meet the criteria set forth in the Zoning Code for the AHD District, as it is located approximately % mile from the boundary of the Village of Greenport. The area in which the property is located consists of lots containing as little as 5500 square feet to 22,000 square feet. The Town's Master Plan provides for the creation of Affordable Housing Districts. We believe this project is consistent with the concepts set forth in the AHD criteria in that the opportunity for the development of high-density housing for families of moderate income will be created. The proposed project fulfills the stated purpose of Article V of the Zoning Code of the Town of Southold and will be consistent with the character of the surrounding area. The subject property ia located in a mixed-use area. Although the properties adjacent to the site are zoned R-40, most are non-conforming undersized lots, comparable to those proposed. Within close proximity are R-80, Limited Business (LB), Affordable Housing (AHD) District and Residential Office (RO) uses, The subject property is within walking distance to the Village of Greenport downtown area, houses of worship, and public transportation. The area is serviced by the Suffolk County Water Authority and LIPA. No public sewer system is available. On-site septic systems will be designed to conform to Suffolk County Health Department standards. It is anticipated that the traffic generated by this project will not compromise the safety and capacity of the street system in the area. The site plan for the proposed project has not yet been developed. However, these concerns will be addressed in the planning process. It is anticipated that two of the proposed lots will front on Sound Road and have direct access. Access to the remainder of the lots will be from Sutton Place. MA TINE INC. The typical home to be offered will have 3 bedrooms and 2 ~ baths with a total area of approximately 1600-2400 square feet, The homes will be held in fee simple ownership, There are no cooperative interests proposed. The subdivision will be created to Town specifications with dedication of the road upon completion, SCHEDULE A ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being near Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York and bounded and described as follows: ~ BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of the North Road which point of beginning is the southwesterly corner of the premises herein described and the southeasterly corner of lands now or formerly of Elizabeth T. Albertson and others; running thence northerly ~long the easterly line of lands now or formerly of Elizabeth T. Albertson and others to the southerly line of lands now or formerly of Dorothy Barstow; thence easterly along the southerly line of lands last mentioned and lands now or formerly of Herbert Fordham to the westerly line of Sound Road or Avenue; thence southerly along the westerly line of Sound Road to lands now or formerly of Whitney; thence westerly and again southerly along the aforementioned lands to lands now or formerly of Kszyminski; thence westerly and again southerly along lands last mentioned to the northerly line of the North Road; thence westerly along the northerly line of North Road to the point or place of BEGINNING. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed by deed dated December 11, 1989 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on April 10, 1990 in Liber 11049 Page 59. CATHERINE MESZANO, INC. Licensed Real Estate Broker Real Estate Consultant September 5, 2001 Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Request for Change of Zone SCTM # 1000-35-01-04 5.7 A. n/s North Road Greenport, NY Applicant: MaTine, Inc. Box 1925 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Neville: I am the agent for Ma Tine, Inc. the applicant and contract vendee of the above referenced property. The applicant is seeking a change of zone from the present zoning, R-40, to Affordable Housing (AHD) District. The purpose of the proposed change of zone is to enable the applicant to develop the site as an affordable housing project. The need for affordable housing on the North Fork has been well documented. The site is well situated to meet the criteria set forth in the Zoning Code for the AHD District, as it is located approximately ~ mile from the boundary of the Village of Greenport. The area in which the property is located consists of lots containing as little as 5500 square feet to 22,000 square feet. The density allowed under the proposed change of zone would result in the creation of twenty-four 10,000 square foot lots. It is the intention of the developer to limit the yield to 10 lots of approximately 15,000 square feet each and create a natural buffer of 1.5 acres. Ten of the lots are to be offered under the provisions of the Town of Southold Affordable Housing Program and the three remaining lots are to be retained by the developer. Enclosed please find the following: 1. Application. 2. Petition. 3. Application fee in the amount of $1000.00. 4. Six copies of a radius map dated Aug. 1, 2001 prepared by Fox Land Surveying. 5. Owner's consent. 6. Transactional disclosure. 7. Certified mail receipts and mailing list. Should you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Catherine Mesiano, President Enclosures 12 Mill Pond Lane * East Moriches, New York 11940 · 631.878.8951 REQUESTFOR CHANGE OFZONF APPLICANT/CONTRACT VENDEE: OWNER: SURVEYOR: ENGINEER: APPLICANT'S ATTORNEY: APPLICANT'S AGENT: SUBJECT PROPERTY: MA TINE INC. CHRISTINE C. HURTADO, PRES. P,O. BOX 1925 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 CATHERINE E. TASKER 3509 BRANDON WAY MISSOULA, MO 59803 PECONIC SURVEYOR, P.C. JOHN METZGER, L.S. P.O. BPX 909 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 JOSEPH FISCHETTI, P.E. P.O. BOX 616 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 ABIGAIL WICKHAM, ESQ. P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, NY 11952 CATHERINE MESIANO, INC 12 MILL POND LANE EAST MORICHES, NY 11940 631-878-8951 5.7-ACRE PARCEL 69125 C.R. 48 GREENPORT, NY a/ida SCTM # 1000-35-1-4. CONSENT Re: SCTM# 1000'-35-1-4 69125 County Road 48, Greenport, New York I, CATHERINE E. TASKER, the owner of the above referenced property, consent to MA TINE, INC.; John Hurtado; Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, P.C.; Peconic Surveyors, P.C.; Joseph Fisehetti; Land Use Ecological Services, Inc., or any of their representatives and/or agents, to make applications necessary for the approval of a major or minor subdivision of the above property, and/or change of zone to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Town of Southold Planning Board, Town Board of the Town of Southold, and any other agencies or municipalities having jurisdiction over the premises. Such applications shall include all r~. ers in connection therewith. Catherine E. Tasker 21~consent i;ECEIVED APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSUHE FORM AU(~ 1 4 2001 The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits con~ interest on the part of town officers and employees. Th~ p~;pose of this form is to provide information which cmn alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: (Last name, firs~ name, middle initial, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company,s name.) NATI/~E OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax'grievance Variance Change of zone~ Approval of plat %/' Exemption from plat or official map Other (If "Other,,, name the activity.) Do you personalZy (or through yonr company, s~ouse, sibling, ownership of (or employment by) s cor~oration in which / If you answered "YES," complete the balance of this form and date and sign where Indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of thah person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the ~own officer or employee. Either check ~he appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The cown officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all thau apply): A) th~ 9wner of great.er ~h~ .5% of the shares of the corporate stock of the applic~n~ (when the applic~-~ ~s a corporation); B) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a no.corporate entlDy (when the applicant is not a corporation); C) an Officer, director, partner, or employee Of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant, DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submittj~day of~;/ .~ ,lr· APPLICANT THANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FOR The Town of Southold's Code Of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of town officers and employees. Th~ purpose of this form is to provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: (Last name, first name, middle initiaX, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, indicate the other person's or company's name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax~-gr ievance Variance Change of zone Approval of plat Exemption from plat or official map Other (If "Other,,, name the activity.) parent, or child} have a relationship with any. officer or e~ployee of the Town of Southold? 'Helationship- includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. "Business interest- means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or e~ploy~ent by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns note than 5% of the If you~swered "YES," complete the balance of this form and date and~gn where indicated. 'Name of-- ~pere~m~ employed by the Town of Southold ' Title ~r p~ei~ of that person Describe the rel~lonship between yourself (the applicant) and the.~own offlc~ Or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)~Drongh D) and/or describe in the space provided. ' ~-' The town officer or emplo~e or his or her spouse, sibling, parentf or c ih ld i~c~ec~-that apply): A) the own~er of greater ~an ~s a corporation); B) the legai or beneficial owner of any interest in a ~t? e~ (w~e. th~plicant is eot a corporation); ............. applicant; or DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 3__~_day 9.f~_~_OO / Print name~Z,~m^~ WILLIAM WICKHAM ERIC J, BrESSLER ABIGAIL A. W~CKHAM 1YNNE M GORDON JANET GEASA LAW OFFICES WlCKHAM, WlCKHAM & BRESSLER, 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND NEW YORK II952 RECEIVED NOV 9 2~30l 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO. 631-298-8565 November 8, 2001 Southold fown Clef[ MELVILLE OFFICE 275 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD SUITE III MELVILLE, NEW YORK 11747 631 249-9480 TELEFAXNO. 631-249-9484 Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Town of Southold Post Office Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Applicant: Ma Tine, Inc. - Request of Change of Zone Application Premises: Sunset Court, Greenport, New York SCTM#1000-35-1-4 Dear Ms. Neville: Enclosed is the completed Full Environmental Assessment Form in connection with the change of zone application. Please advise as to the status of the matter. AA W/dtnc 30/shdtnclk Very truly yours, Abigail A. Wickham 14-16-2 (9/95)-- 7c 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureabie. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full lEAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information abobt a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ,~ Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action beqause th.e. mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions · Name of Action Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency RECEIVED Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency NOV 9 2001 Title of Responsibl~' Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date S0uth01d Town Clerk 5 Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: [~0-10% 100 % [10-15% % [~15% or greater % 6 Is proiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? E3Yes [~No 7. is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? []Yes E~No 8 What is the depth of the water table? 504- (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~Yes [3No 10 Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? E]Yes ~No 11 Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes [~No According to Field inspection Identify each species 12 Are there any unique or umlsual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) /~Yes [~No Describe 13 ]s the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? E3Yes [~No If yes, explain 14 Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E]Yes ~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16 Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) 17, Is the site served by existing public utilities? J~]Yes [~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [~Yes' b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? []0'es ~]No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA, Section 303 and 304? L~Yes ~]No 19 Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 E~Yes J~No 20 Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? IqYes ~]No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 5. ? b. Project acreage to be developed: 5. ? acres initially; 4 o 2 c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped I . 5 acres. d Length of project, in miles: 0.1 (If appropriate) e If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A ; proposed 20 g Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 20 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Famil,/ Two Family Multiple Family Initially 10 - - Ultimately 10 - - Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~0' height; 40' width; Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 625 acres. acres ultimately. Condominium 60 ' length. ft 25. Approvals Required: City, ']-own, Village Board [gYes City, Town, Village Planning Board [~Yes DNo City, Town Zoning Board ~]Yes ~]No City, County Health Department [~Yes []No Other Local Agencies [~Yes [~No Other Regional Agencies OYes [~No State Agencies E~Yes ~No Federal Agencies [~Yes [~No Type Subdivision Subdivision sanitary C. Zoning and Planning Information I Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~Yes E~No If Yes, indicate decision required: Z]zoning amendment L~zoning variance E~special use permit '~subdivision [~site plan [~new/revision of master plan r~resource management plan ~other 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? B-1 Residence 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? (10) Single family dwellings Submittal Date 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? B-1 Residence 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? (10) Single family dwellings 6 Is the prbposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/~ mile radius of proposed action? Residential DNo 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 1 6,000 s.f. 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? · ~]Yes ~No 10 E3Yes ]~No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? [~Yes E3No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? E~Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [~Yes ~lNo a. If y~s, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E3Yes E3No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may De any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to th~ best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sp°ns°r ~[~e~ ~__~,~__~.~/~ U~ ~l~i~l ~i~c' 10/16/01 Signature . Title President If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coaslal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 IMPACT ON WATER 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Unde~ Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream · Lxtension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · (onstruction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? [~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres ot surface area. · Other impacts: 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? E3NO (~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day · Proposed Actk, will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other nnpacts:__ 6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? E3NO ~]YFS Examples that would apply to colunm 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 1 2 3 Smalr to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [~Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []N( [] [] [~Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ E3Yes ~No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land, · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more tban 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (eg., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need tot such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? E3NO E~YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural, · Proposed land uses, or proiect components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Proiect components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to th~ area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO f~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic platt,:, · Any impact to au archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action wilJ occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 {~NO []YES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: 9 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ©Yes [] [] [~Yes ~lNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E3No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? [~NO [~Y£S Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the proiect is located is likely to grow by more than 5% · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this projecL · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [:]Yes [:]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [:]Yes [:]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [:]Yes []Mo 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? [~NO I'"IYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(i) is considered to be p01entlally large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly describe the impact 2 Describe (if applicable) how the impact c0uJd be mitigated or reduced to a Small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3 Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11  OOF OFMAILING OF NOTICE ADDRESS STATE OF NEW YORK : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: SS.: kJ ~l , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ~; d.~y of ~ :~'~t-,...,.,-d~,,..._ , LE.~o o L, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the reverse side hereof, directed to each of the abov..-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective 'names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the cur- rent.assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at ~ J'~J-~ . /'g~ that said Not ces were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (Fegis-eer-~.) ma I. Sworn to me tltis day of _ ,~ , NoZ[a r y Public LINDA J. COOPER Notary Public, State of New YodJ No. 4522663, Suffolk Ce~qJy ~ ~ ~.~ Term E~pire$ Oecember 31, ~ ~--~-~-~-~ TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTH~'~D In the fi,latter of the Petition of MA TINE, INC., tO the Town Board of lhe Town of SouthoJd. NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO: YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to requ~t a charge of zone from Low Density Residential R-40 District to ~ffordable Housing · ~AHD) District~ 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located ad,cent to your prgp$Cl~.and ~ d~- cribedzsfoUows: 69125 County Route 48, Greennort, NY. SCTM #1000-35-1-4. N o~tw of North ~oad (County Route 48); East of Dobler; $9~T~. of the Town of Southold and others; ~est of Sound Road and others. 3. Thatthe property whichisthesubjectofsuch Petitionislocatedinthefollowingzoningdlstrict: LOW Density Residential R-40 District 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: Affordable Housinq. (AHD) District $. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must bc held on. the matter by thc Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the das~ of such hearing in the Suffolk Times or in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, new~papers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to al>. pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: /gU~2, 23 e 2ool MA TINE, INC. Petitioner Christine C. Hurtado, Pres. Contract Vendee of Catherine E. Tasker Post Office Address: P.O. Box 1925 .Southold, New York 11971 (Endomement Requlrel I. 50 Marion Saccone 9 Sutton Place Greenport, N.Y. 11944 ID: 0%,0 Postmark Here Clerk: KFOH3U 07/05/0~ Certified Fee ,I ~-R Return Receipt Fee Postmark , D (Endorsement Required) ~ .50 Here t.~, ~. KFO!iJV -;' 09/Ob/O1 Ronald Pascale 79 Baa* Beach Road Port Washington,NY 11050 AL US ~ $ (.3~ UNIT ID: 0?40 ~ 1.50 Po~m~m ~J Re~'tedl:~tk~ryFe~ Clerk: ~FOHJV ru '~.nt CatherineE. Tasker = ..... 3509 Brandon Way I~ ~ s.~~ o~oo M,ssoula, MT 59803 Ii ~ }J;~' ............. , g Postag Certified Fee Return Receip Fee Endorsement Required) __ Restricted Derive~y Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Return Receipt Fee Postmark {Endorsement RequiredI Here ~'lerk: [FOHJV Tot.,. ...... ¢ J' % 09/05/01 ent~ Steve & WF Manouvelos ~;~' 3053 o~o' Crescent St. Long Is/and City, NY 11102 AL US $ 0.34 UNIT ID: 0940 2.I0 1~50 Hem CleH:::KFOH.~. 3.94 09/05!0_ E  ,1 ~ i s,.m Charles V. & W.F. Raynor ~ [ 17 Sound Road E~[orPOB Greenport,NY 11944 :~- i Cer tiqed Fee Returr Receipt Fee ~ ";'6 Sophie Raynor 17 Sound Road Greenport, Ny 11944 09105/01 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee )Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) 0.34 JNIT I[*: 09q0 Here I ]lerk: KFOHSV ~ 3.94 A~to~s ~ E~en Natsou~ 15 Sound Road ~eonpo~, NY 11944 Postage KFOHJV ........ m 5,94 09105/0! Theodore & Maria Petikas 225 Stewart Avenue Bethpage, NY 11714 Postage $ Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee Restricted Delivery Fee )Endorsement Required) 0,34 U~II ID 0~40 9 i{t Postmark 1.50 Clerk: KFOHJV 3.74 09/05/01 Mary Gabriel & Adriarme Greenburg 2476 E. 18m St Brooklyn, NY 11235 ~ 1 Postage ~ Certified Fee ;Return Receipt Fee LI ndorsement Required) UNIT ID: 0940 Postmark Here Clerk: KFOHJV o_ ~ 6,94 09/05/01 Stephen M. oc trances A. Oorris 301 E. 38t~ Street Apt. l ID NewYork, NY 10016 ~1 Postmark Return Here ru 1.50 ~ Restricted Deliver ~ - . . · ~ {Endorsement F Cz~ = KFOHJV rtl t~ Se*,ro John H. Pedersen ~i;~:; P.O. Box 456 ~ o,~O~ Greenport, NY 11944 0940 1,50 RestriCted Delivery Fee [ (Endorsernent Required) 35 Sold Road Gr~npo~, NY L.',~!T I0:0940 Postmark Here Clerk: ~[0HSV 09/05/01 11944 ~ost,~e Ui!!T ii;: 0?40 Certified Fee Postmark Return Receipt Fee Her~ (Endorsement Required) ~ r'O., Restricted Dellvel¥ Fee i~8 f'~::: KF{)I~~ Total Postage & Fee.~ $ 3.94 09/05/0 j. mm se,,t~o Ann Stanilaus street,/ 35 Sound Road --% ..... Greenport, NY 11944 UNIT I[~: 0940 Postmark Here I {Endomement Require( Clerk-" EFOHJV G~rge & Ma~ Sab~o 50 Sutton Place Greenpo~, NY 11944 (Endorsement Required} C!er~: KFOH3V Total Postage & Fees ~ se,~ro James & WfOinzio Jr. ~;;~r:~.,: 39 Sold Avenue o~o ~o~ ~eenpo~, NY 11944 ID: 0940 (Endorsement J- ,50 Here (Endorsement Required) ',!erk: KFOHJV Total Po 3.94 09/05/01 se~ ~o V~cent & Edna Quatroche 12 Sutton Place C~eenpod, NY 11944 0940 Henr~ yanwyck & 34 Sunset Lane Oreenport, NY 11944 (Endorsement Required} I Tot~' - 3,94 ChristopherButterfield & Stacey Pomara 36 Sunset Lane Oreenport, New York ! 1944 Postmark Here · ~1 Postage 0,34 iJNI: u. ~q' 0:)40 · Lq ;;~ (Endorsement Required) 1,50 [:3 I~l Restricted Delivery Fee :)~erk: KFOH3V ~ Sero Jo~ P. Brady ~ ~3;;, 115 At.tic Avenue m Hempstead, ~ 11550 Postage ID: 0940 Postmark lerk: ~',FOH3V ¢ 3- -c"4 Albert & Maryann Dinizio Trust. 44 Sunset Lane Greenport, NY 11944 I ~ Postage , I.FI ¢~j Card fied Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) 0.34 !.50 · 3.94 09/05/01 Diane Mitehell 41 Sunset Lafle Cn'eetlport, New York 1 f944 Here Clerk: [(FOH3V Postage ID: 0940 1.50 ~' 3,94 Donald Reeves 39 Sunset Lane Greenport, NY 1 ! 944 i!erk: KFOHJV 01 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivew Fee (Endorsement Required) USE 0.34 JNIT ID: 0940 2.I0 1.50 Here ;lerk: KFOHSV · 3.94 )9/05/0t Robert & Charlotte Wbsmano ?~5 Gull Po~d Lane Oreenport, NY 11944 Peqage 0.34 Richard & Priscilla Horan 35 Sunset Lane Greenport, NY 11944 UNIT q;:r; 0940 ~lerk:; ~ FON::V )9105101 Postage CedJfied Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Req erred) Street, 0.34 Uf4l] ID: 0940 2.10 J .50 ]let !<:: KFOHJV 3.94 )9,/05/0J. Robed & Gall Ghosio, Jr. 135 S~et Lane Greenpo~, NY 11944 Postage Certified Fee R rn Receipt Foe (Ends ant Required( Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees 0.34 2_i0 1 $ 3.94 UNiT ID: 0940 Clerk: KFOHSV 09/05/0t Pos age Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required( Res icted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required UNIT ID: 0940 Postmark KFON3~J Joseph D & WF Verity 32 Sound Road Greenport, NY 11944 Total USE UNIT ID: 0940 Certified Fee Postmark ~'Ier[::: KFOHSV ¢ 3.94 09/05/0t Jack and Edwina Skrezec 28 Sound Road Greenport, Ny 11944 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivew Fee (E~dorsement Required) 0,,'~4 2.10 1 ¢ J.94 Elise S. Web: UNIT ID: 0940 ~l-_rk. KF0 , V 09/05/'01 26 Sound Road Greenport, NY 11944 UNIT ID: 0940 Postmark Here ;Ierk: KFOHJV 2064 Alamanda Dr. #25 Naples, F1 34102 P°stage JNIT - r tI. 0940 CerlJfied Fee (Endorsement Required) 1 ~ 50 Restricted De~iver* ,ler[:. KFONJU m 3.94 William S. Sinclair III & L. Sinclair 20 Sound Road Greenport, NY 11944 Postage Certified F~ USE UNIT ID: 0940 Postmark Here (Endorsement Requirer .J-e, k, KrCHdV TotalPo*' - '" ~' J.94 09/05/01 I s.., re Lynne Carlson -~;i;X; 18 Sound Road or~'Oeo, Greenport, NY 11944 Postage dl Certified Fee etum Recep Fee (Eh ement Required} Restricted Deflvery Fee (Endorsement Required) _Xl. g4 UNIT ID: 0940 Here __ !,50 Clerk: KFOUJV ?otar Po.t.~. & Foes I ~ ~, 94 09/05/0! Bobbi LaMont~ 432 ! Hempstead Tpke Bethpage, NY 11714-5798 Postage IIll 0940 Certified Fee Postmark Return Receipt F{ Here 1.50 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Cterk: KFOH3V 09/05/0! Scott Mclntire & Lori Hollander 22 Sound Road GTeenport, NY 11944 Postage Certified Fee Return Recep Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Requfred) B.Moore & iVL ]Ku UNIT ID: 0940 Clef,::: KFOHJV WS[I S.Conklin C/O M. Moore 110 Beaver St. Tyron, NC 28782 Postage 1 Certified Fee turn Receipt Fee {End~ ement Required) Restricted Deliven¢ Fee (Endorsement Requiredl Total Postaoe & Fees UNIT ID: 0940 1.50 Clerk; KFOH3V ~ 3.94 09/05/01 Charles Jr. and wf 14 Sound Road Greenport, NY 11944 ID: 0940 Postmark Here 1.50 Clerk: ~FOHJV 3.94 ~:,; .,.~ Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee r'u (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) mm s~n William J. & Evelyn M. Heins ~: '~i;; Trustees P.O. Box 232 ,q o,~ Orient, NY 11957 · ~l Postage 0.34 m 2.10 ~ (Endo merit Required) 1.50 = ~ Mary Jane Oroll -a ~ 665 Sutton Place ~ -e~ Greenport, NY I 1944 USE UNIT ID: 0940 Postmark Here Cle rl-::: KFOHJV 09/05/0i Certified Fee (Endorsement Reqd red) (Endorsement Requ red) UNIT i[U 0940 Maria Regina 785 Sutton Place t(FOH50 ;05/0i Greenport, NY 11944 U S E . UNIT ID," 0940 ~er~. K~OHJV , se,, ro Thomas R. Watkins, Sr. ~i/~;~, ,~ 895 Sutton Place · Greenpo~, NY 11944 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) $ 0.3q UNIT ID: 0940 2.10 - Postmark 1,50 ' Clerk: Nelia C. Javierre & As Trts. 1055 Sutton Place Greenport, NY 11944 Postage Restricted Delivel (Endomement R, 1.50 ID: 0940 Postmark Here ,link. KF0n3, ~,94 09105/0! Nelia C. Purnhagen 1055 Sutton Place Greenport, NY 11944 ID: 0940 Postmark Here 1.50 ~FOH3V 3.94 09/05/01 Sue Ann Krieling Box 211 236 North Rd. Greenport, NY 11944 Postage Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Tom 1.50 UNIT ID: 0940 Postmark Here KFOHJV 3.94 09105/01 James R. & Judith W. Woodhull ] 915 Shephard Drive ........... ~ Southold, NY 11971 / Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee {Endorsement Required) ID: 0940 Postmark Here !.50 Clerk: KFOH3V 3.94 0../0~;01 Greenport, NY 11944 UNIT ID.' 0940 Postmark Here ]ieH<: KFOHJV $ J.94 09i05/01 Robert W. Bruce 2085A Shipyard Lane East Marion, NY 11939-1246 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) TotaJ Postage & Fees 0 2.I0 1,50 UNiT ID: 0940 Clei-k: K 5V 3,94 09/00; ~O~ Robert Bruce&Robert Hughes 1221 Main Street Greenport, NY 11944 Postage ~e Ced[fled Fee etum Receipt Fee (Eh ement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ,Se C AL 0,34 2.t0 1.50 ~ 3.94 William Heaney USE Crt :UNIT I_rl: 0:~0 t.n Postage 9' Postmark ~ Ger~ified Fee Clerk: KFOHJV o Restrf~ed Dellve~ Fee 09/05/0i 2426 N.E. 14~ St.#80 Ocala, F1 34470 U ..... UNIT ID: 09qO 1.50 u~e~.. KFOHJV 3,94 09/05/0! mo Se., To Frances Ferguson ~;;~;:~ 66230 North Road P.O. Box 589 ilI ~ -oti/m~ Greenport, NY 11944 Postag~ 0. ,~/~ ID: 0940 ~ Postage J~ Real~ Co. c/o Kontokosta 43 W. 54m S~eet ........... ~ o ~;~; New York, NY 10019 gSE ? 10 1,50 ~ 3,94 UNIT ID: 0940 2lerk: KFOH3V 09105/01 Harvey B. Sinuta 755 North Road Greenport, NY 11944 i U S E Postag UNIT ID: 0940 Postmark ~eH. KFOHJV Total Pr, '° m J, 94 09/05,/0~ o,~ re John S. Dorosk/, Jr. ~;~; 12 Madison Street o,~o so Greenpo~, NY 1 ] 944 Postage O,3q UNIT !D: 0940 Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee Here (Endorsemeot Required) 1,50 Restricted Delivery Fee fEndorsement Required) Cle~'~:~ KFOH3V' Total Postage & Fees ~ 3, ~)4 0~)/05/O~ si Gerasimow & WF Moulinas ~i 62-11 37m Avenue ........ Woodside, NY 11377 -- :,.,~ UNIT IB; 0940 ~E ~me,t R~q.~) ,le, L. KFOHJV Total ~'os,.~ & F~s 3.94 09/05/01 Bobbi Zorn 432 l Hempstead Turnpike Bethpage, NY 11714-5798 Po~tage n UNIT .... 0940 CedJfied Fee (Endorsement Required) (Endorsement Required) Clerk: KFOHJV ~..'* O~05,,v:. son, re Andreas Lies & wi' -~i;~:~ 992 Ailie Road o~eo s, N. Massapequa, NY 11758 UNIT ID: 0940 Restricted Oelivecy Fe (Endorsemen Required Total r KrOHoV u'~/O,J, O1 Peter A. Verdirame & wi' 7 Reid Ave Port Washington, NY 11050 UNIT ID: 0940 Postmark KFOHJV Gregory A&Krmten R/she 130 Tasker Lane Greenport, NY l 1944 0.,'t4 UNIT ID: 0940 2, 10 Postmark 1.5( Cler'k: ...... ' ar OHov 3.94 09/05/0i s,~, George E. Cottral ~i;;a 315 Sutton Place P.O.Box 15 .... ;;Greenport, NY 11944 Postage UNIT lit: 0940 Clerk: KFOH3V rc Michel & Wf Kourouklis ~eenpo~, NY 11944 ID: 0940 Postmark Clerk:: KFOHJV Tyncr Loving Trust Sunset Lane Greenport, NY 11 944 (Endorsement Restricted Deliver ID: 0940 Clerk:: · 3,94 09/'05/01 George & Katherine Figetakis Astoria,, NY 1 1103 ID: 0940 KFOHJU John 0%'05/01 & ViCtoria Hel~ski 9 Madison St. Oreenport, NY 11944 Postage CerlJfied Fee Total Sent 71 USE UNIT ID: 0940 1,50 2Ierk: KFOHJU 3.94 Alexandros Alexandrou 330 Victor Lane Woodbury, NY 11797 0.34 2.10 1.50 John Voiklis UNIT ID: 0940 P°stmarkI Here CleF,t::: ~FOH,~,,, [~91'05/01 1150 McCann Lane Greenport, NY 11944 ID: 0940 Postmark Here 1.50 CleFk:: KFOHSV 3.94 09/05/0~ Henry Hulse 450 Tasker Lane P.O. Box 155 Greenport, NY 11944 Postag m UNIT ID: 0940 Cerlified Fee (enOorsement nequ,~e< Clerk: KFOHJV ......... ~ 3.94 09/05/01 Mike O & Mar/ka M Papas 700 McCann Lane Crreenport, NY 11944 Postage Ceriified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Tort UNIT ID: 0940 Postmark 1.50 Clerk: KFOHJV g. 94 09/05/0t Galantis Realty. LLC 28-19 35m St Astoria, NY 11103 Postage UNIT ID: 0940 :Ierk: ~FOHJV m J.94 09/05/0t Carol Mavity 350 BJeeker Street New York, NY 10014 Postage Cedified Fee Ret n Receipt Fee (Endors ent Required) USE 0,,~4 UNIT ID: 0940 2.10 -Postmark 1.50 Clerk: KFOHSV ~ o (~ ~Y tJ2 ID: 0940 Postmark Here 1.50 C~,;t L, KFOHJV ¢ J.94 09/05/0i Cynthia Harmon 170 West End Avenue New York, NY 10023 0.34 - 2.10 1,50 3.94 USE UNIT I[~: 0940 Postmark Clerk: KF'OHJb 09/05/0!. Theophanis & WF Karakostas 160-02 Grand Central Pkwy Jamacia, NY 11432 UNIT ID: 0940 1.50 ]lerk: KFOH3V ~9 ~. 4 09/05/0i Vicent & Lara Liquori III 39 River Street Sayville, Ny 11782 Certified Fee Return Reoeip! Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) 1.50 UNIT !g: 0940 Postmark Clerk: KFOH3V 3.94 09105/01 Durwood & Patricia Browne Jr. 4 Middleton Road Greenport, NY l 1944 I Postag UNIT ID: 0940 Certified Fee Postmark turn Receipt Fee Here (End ement Required} 1,50 Restricted Deliver7 Fee r, ~' ~., (Endorsement Required) bl.~ ., I{FOH3V fo~ ..... · J.94 09/05/01 Patrica Kohl & Sarah Costello 415 Wiggbs Road Greenport, New York 11944 ID: 0940 Postmark Here C1~- ,. 3.94 09/05/01 Robert & Wf Kase 6751 210th Street Bayside, NY 11364 Postage UNIT ID: 0940 Cedified Fee Postmark Here --1- Certified Fee Return Reoeipt Fee )Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivew Fee (Endorsemenl Required) Total Postage & Fees 2.10 1.50 $ 3,94 Jean Misuraca 68835 CR 48 Greenport, NY 11944 UNIT ID: 0940 Postmark Here Clerk:: KFOHgV 09/05/01 lu Poetag UNIT II!: 0940 CerlJfied Fee Postmark R m Receipt Fee (Endorsement RequiredJ Here (Endorsement R ]!erk: KFOH3~J ~'. ?4 09/05/01 ~ ~ Timoth '' = [ ........ y Muellcr q I or~O~ . ~u or. second Floor ~ ~New York, NY 10011-2830 Total Postage & Fees Debra M. Scott 700 McCann Lane Greenport, NY 11944 Total Postage & Foes STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) SS; RECEIVED OCT 1 8 2001 Southohl 1'own ClerL Michele Clifford, residing at 136 Cranford Blvd., Mastic, NY, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 11m day of October, 2001, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the reverse side hereon, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at East Moriches, NY; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by certified mail. Sworn to before me this/._?day of ~)~ 2001 ~-'"-Notary Public b/ ~OP, AH A.,NICOtA ~ #l#ly Public St~ ~f New ~ No 0!'!~ gg4066 i NAME Pt~F OF MAILING OF NOTICF O ADDRESS STATE OF NEWYORK : COUNTY OFSUFFOLK: 55.; of ~ .~T'..,.,.,-d~ ~ . , l~r.,to o , , deponent mailed a true copy of [he Notice set forth on the revers¢ side hereof, directe~ ~o each of the abov ,-named persons at ~he addresses set opposite their respective names; cha~ [he addresses sec opposite thc names of said persons are ~he addresses of said persons as shown on the cur- rent assessment roil of the Town of Southoid; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at ~ ~~ , ~ ;~ha~said Notices were mailed to each oFsaid personsby (cerfiRed) (reg~s:crcd) mail. Sworn ro~e this ~0 ~ day of ~ , ~0.~ being duly sworn, deposes and says [bacon the i~/,~ day Notary Public UNOA J. COOPER NO(a~Y Public, St??.o.f. N~ew ._Y?k. No. 4822563, Suli'olK t;ouJ~Y2 Term E.qpire~ December 31 1,50 Total Postage & Fees Lo ioo q Postmark Clerk: K~B'A' O.J4 ID: 0940 Postmark 1,50 lerk: KQHBY¥ J.94 ,nd 3 Also complete [ivecy is desired ddress on the reverse the card to you , back of the mailpiece /477 X PoMage $ Certified Fee Total Postage & Fees O.J4 ID: 0940 Postmark ~lerk. KQHBY'f J.94 )9/14/01 I,/'4 I Iq~ OF MAILING OF NOTICE ADDRESS ~I~,ED NOV 2001 ~'~urno~a ~OWn Clerk 22 Pearl Road, Rocky Point, NY 11778 STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) SS: Catherine Mesiano, residing at 12 Mill Pond Land, East Moriches, NY, being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 6th day of November, 2001, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the reverse side hereon, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at East Moriches, NY; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by certified mail. Sworn to before me this ~ day of /~v~, ,2001 Notary/Public LINDA J. COOPER Notary Publk~, State of New York No. 4822563, Suffolk, County. Term Exptro~ December ~, 't'9,-..~ LAW OFFICES WlCKHAM, WlCKHAM & [BRESSLER, P.c. 10315 MAIN ROAD, P.O, BOX 1424 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND NEW YORK 11952 RECEIVED NOT 9 631-298-8353 TELEFAX NO. 631-298-8565 November 8,2001 Southold Town Cled. TELEFAX NO 631 B49-9484 Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Town of Southold Post Office Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Applicant: Ma Tine, Inc. - Request of Change of Zone Application Premises: Sunset Court, Greenport, New York SCTM#1000-35-1-4 Dear Ms. Neville: Enclosed is the completed Full Environmental Assessment Form in connection with the change of zone application. Please advise as to the status of the matter. AA W/dmc encL 30/shdtnclk cc: C Me$iano Very truly yours, Abigail A. Wickham '14-16 2~'(9/95)-- 7c 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a proiect or action may be significant The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer· Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis· In add tion, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action· Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentiaUy-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ,~ Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared, [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action beqause th.e mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative de~laratlon will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact .on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions -Name of Action Town of Southold Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency RECEIVED Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency NOV 9 2001 Title of Responsibl~ Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date Southold Tgwn Clerk PART 1--PROJECT'INFORMA- ~N Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review, Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Sunset Court, Greenport, Suffolk County (SCTM No. 1000-35-01-04) NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) Mr. John Hurtado, Sr. ADDRESS P.O. Box 1925 CITY/PO STATE ZIP COOE Southold NY 11971 NAME OF OWNER (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE ZiP CODE DESCRI~IONOFACTION Applicant proposes to subdivide a 248,929 s.f. parcel into (10) lOts, ranging in size from 15,000 to 16,000 s.f.. Each lot will be improved with single family dwelling, sanitary system, driveway and landscaping. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: C1Urban I-Ilndustrial C1Commercial II, Residential (suburban) fiRural (non-farm) fiForest fi]Agriculture fiOther '5°? 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREACE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Lawn and landscaping Other (indicate type) Haven Loam 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 5.7 acres 1 . 5 acres - 1 .00 - 3.20 a. Soil drainage: [~/Vell drained 1 00 % of site I-IModerately well drained % of site I-IPoorly drained % of site b, If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N/A acres. (See I NYCRR 370). Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [~Yes :~No a What is depth to bedrock? 600+ (in feet) 2 5 Approxlmate perce ]ta§e of proposed project site with slopes: ~0-10% 100 % L~1015% % ~15% or greater__ % 6 Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, s~te, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? [~Yes ~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [~Yes [~No 8 What is the depth of the water table? , 50+ (in feet) 9 Is site located over a prm]ar¥, principal, or sole source aquifer? L,~'Yes [~No 10 Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [~Yes ~]No 11 Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [~No According to Field inspection Identify each species 12 Ate there any unique or unusual land forms on the proiect site? (ie., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) E~]Yes C~No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes ~No If yes, explain 14 Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? E~Yes [~No 15 Streams within or contiguous to project area: ~one a Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16 Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name N/A b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ,~]Yes linc a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [~Yes E~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [~'Yes E~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~Yes ~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [qYes R1No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? E]Yes :~]No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimer~sions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 5. ? acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 5.7 4.2 acres initially; acres ultimately. c. ProJect acreage to remain undeveloped 1 ..5 . acres. d Length of project, in miles: 0.1 (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/~ . f Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A ; proposed 20 g Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 20 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially 1 0 - _ Ultimately 1 0 - _ i Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure .~0 ' height; ~0~ width; _ j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? Condominium 60' _ length 62.5 _ ft. 2 How much natural material (i~ , rock, earth, etc) will be removed from t ,itc? 0 tons/cubic yard~ ~ Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? XqYes (~]No F]N/A a If ,/es, for what intended purpose is the site bemg reclaimed? ~ Lap. dscaplng' b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes (~No c will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes t~No 4.2 4 How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres S will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this proiect? ~]Yes E~No 1 2 months, (including demolition) 6 If single phase project Anticipated period of construction ~ 7. if multi-phased: N/A a Total number of phases anticipated _-- (number) b Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 _ month c. Approximate completion date of final phase mo ~th.__. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? F3Yes [:}No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? FqYes (~No 0 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ 1 0 after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? E}Yes EgNo If yes, explain year, (including demolition) year. 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? E3Yes ;IgNo a If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13 Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes E3No Type _Sanitary effluent 14. will surface area of an existing water body increase o~ decrease by proposal? ~lYes ~No Explain ~Yes 15. is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16. Will the project generate solid waste? []~Yes [:]No a. If yes, what is the amount per mohth _ 1 .'7 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? K]Yes E:No ~own of $outhold Facility; location c. If yes, give name d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain J~No [~Yes [~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? . b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. will project use herbicides or pesticides? [~'es E]Yes [~No tons/month. years. E3No (Household) 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [~Yes~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ~]Yes E}No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? E~Yes E3No gas If yes , indicate type(s) Heating oil, electricity, 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23 Total anticipated water usage per day 1 ~000 gallons/day. 24 Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? E~Yes If Yes, explain gallons/minute, (Maximum) ][]No 4 25. A~pprovals Required: City, Town, Village Board [Yes ~]No City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes ~]No City, Town Zoning Board OYes ~No City, County Health Department ~Yes Other Local Agencies [~Yes ~No Other Regional Agencies [Yes [~No State Agencies ~]Yes ~No Federal Agencies DYes Type Subdivision Subdivision sanitary Submittal Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~[~Yes []No If Yes, indicate decision required: L~zoning amendment []zoning variance [special use permit ][]subdivision [site plan [~new/revision of master plan []resource management plan [other 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ]3-1 Residence 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning~ (10) Single family dwellings 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? B-1 Residence 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? (10) Single family dwellings ' 6 Is the prbposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Z]Yes 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? Residential ~]No 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V~ mile? 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of [and, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? I 6~000 s.f. ~]Yes [3No 10 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water d str cts? OYes 11 WdJ the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ~Yes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~es ~]No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present evels? [~Yes ~No a if y~s, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additiona traffic? E~Yes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to th~ best of my knowledge Applicant/Sponsor Na~ne/}~"'~--"~S W. ~Dwman/T~nc] O~ P~::oloc. lical ~i~- 10/16/01 Signature ~ Y ' ~---- Title ~esi~t -- --- If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a slate a~ency, complete fha Coaslal Assessmenl Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR ..,AGNITUDE R~,sponsibility of [cad Agency General Information (React Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question Haw~ my responses ~md determinations been reasonable~. 1he reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst · Identifying that an impact will be potentially la~ge (column 2) does not mean that It is a[~o necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PAR] 3 to determine s~gnificance ldentdying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further · The Examples provided are to assist the rewewer bv showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would triggera response in column2 The examples aregene~allyapplicablethr°ugh°ut the State and for most situations But, for any specific project or site other examples andior lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3 * The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts anti thresholds to answer each question · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects Instructions (Read carefully) a Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2, Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact, If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1 d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3 e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{s) in the proiect to a small to moderate indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1 will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? [Z]NO [Z]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the proiect area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. * Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · ConstructiOn on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts I 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be vloderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change j~] ~ []Yes []No [] E3 J~]Yes [~]No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~ves ~No ~ Lq ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 2 will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., c frs dunes, geological formations, etc)CJNO ~YES · Specific land forms: 6 IMPACT ON WATER 3 Wiil preposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Unde~ A~ticles 15, 24, 25 of the ~nvironmentaJ Conservation Law, ~NO L~YE I-×amples that would apply to column 2 · Developable a~ea of site contains a protected water body · Dredging more thdn 100 cubic yards of material from channel of protected stream · ~xtens~on o~ utility distribution facilities through a protected water bo · (onslruction m a designated freshwater or tidal wetland · Othe~ impacts: 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new bod of water? ~-~NO ~YE Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ~]NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a sot~rce of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity, * Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day · Proposed Actk~, will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural condit OhS. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities · Other impacts:__ 6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? L~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would Change flood water flows. 7 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By ~d? Impact Impact Project Change ES ~ ~ [~Yes []No [] ~ L~Yes L-JNo ~' ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No -- ~ ~ ~Ves ~No Y S r ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes UNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~tes ~No · Proposed Act,on may cause substantial eros,on. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns · Proposed Action witi allow development in a designated floodway · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impact ,Project Change ~ LJ ~_~Yes UNo [~] [] []Yes [~No [] ~ [~Yes sr~No [] FJ []Yes ~_~No IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will proposed action affect air quality? f_}NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. ,. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas, · Other impacts: [] E3 []yes []No [] ~ L~Yes [~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [~JNo [] [] []Yes [~JNo [] [] ~Yes ~]No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS - 8 will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered E3NO E3YES species? Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal iisi, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. .~' Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts:_ [] [] ~Yes J~]No [~] [~3 [~]Yes [~No [] [] []Yes [~]No [] [] []Yes ~]No 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or ~]NO E]YES non-endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Wiil the Proposed Action affect agricultural ]and resources? E3NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc) 8 [] [] []Yes []No J~3 [] ~Yes J~]No []Yes []No ' Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2 5 acres of agricultural land · fhe proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (eg, subsurface drain lines, outlet ditch strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: 1 2 Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change OYes ~]No []Yes []No Z] [] E3¥es []No [~Yes [~]No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? L~NO E3YES (lf necessary, use the Visual £AF Addendum in Section 617.21 Appendix B,) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or si§nificant screening of scenic views known to be important to th~ area. · Other impacts: [] [] []:]Yes [~No [] [] []Yes []N( [] [] [~]Yes []No [] [] []Yes IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES t2. Wdl Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? [~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic place, ' Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the proiect site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory, · Other impacts: [~]Yes []No [] [] []Yes ~lNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I--lYes [~]No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 E3NO E~Y£S · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity, · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other Impacts: 9 [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [~]Yes []No [] [] [~Yes []No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? [3NO [3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods · Proposed Action will result ~n major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 will proposed action affect the communiW's sources of fuel or E~NO DYES energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy ~n the municipality · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result E3NO I~YES of the Proposed Action? Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely [more than one hour per day) · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts:_ IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? C/NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritatini infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste · Other impacts: Small to Potential Gan Im Moderate Large Mitiga Impact Impact Project ~.~ [_~ ~]Yes [] ~ ~Yes [] [] [~Yes [] [] ~Yes [] ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~ ~ ~Ye~ ~ ~ ~Ye ~ ~ UYe ~ ~ ~Y, )act Be ated By Change E-~No [~No ~No [No C/No [No E/No I~No E]No l/No ~No ~No ~NO 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ~]NO [~YES Examples that wotJld apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5% · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use, · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional communitv services (e.g schools, police and fire, etc) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment· · Other impacts:_ 1 2 I 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [~]Ves [~]No [] [] ~]Yes gNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes ~]No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~o 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? [3NO [~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or It You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared it one or more impact(t) is considered lo be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly describe the impact 2 Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by proiect change(s). 3 Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 TOTAL AREA = 5.7' Acres -* AREA OF BUFFER = I..5 Acres TOTAL NO. LOTS -I0 AFFORDABLE -7 PECONIC SUR~v (6..,~) 765 - 5020 P. O. BOX 909 I,E$O TRAVELER ',STREET MAP OF SUNSET COURT A T GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y. 1000-35-01-04 Sc~e.. 1" = 60' JUNE I, 200t ( revision 1797 NO TE, ROOf' & DRIVEWA, Y DRYWELL$ FOR EACH HOUSE IN LIEU OF SUMP ~' ',--' --' i-b"J'Z) = . :~,.:~/. NOTICE~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~ ~ ~ Og5 ~ r~Red Prop~ty lax Service A~cy ~= ~ ., ~- SOUTHOLO SECTION NO Fl --] NOTICE J ~Jl~JJ~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK © I~INTF~NANC~,&LTER'TIO~SAL[ O" ~Red Prop~ty lax Service Agency SOUTHOLD SECTION NO 033 J. O00 PROPERTY M~ LOCATION MAP SCALE 1"=600' '* I HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED , ':~ ~¢) X ~~~XT,~,q,~ ,'~>0~ ~ v:, CONSTRUC~ON STANDARDS IN EFFECT AS OWNER NOTE SITE DATA BUFFE~ AREA 75,239 S.F. OR ~.7272 ACRES SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SER zo~l~ USE DIS~ICT PROPOSED "AHD" (CURRENT A-2) JOB N0'2001-295 Preliminary Subdivision Plot N TABLE OF LOT AREAS: ~ee~o~ HOSE STANDARDS THIS APPROVAL SHA~L BE~'%~N%~%~%~%~L~THN IrC~ ~~~~, ~ LOT 1 15,000 S,F, Townof ~: ~u~ ~i~ ~;s ::~ %$S ~ET~; B:~FI~:~T~%%T; E LoTLOTLOT554 15.01915'00015'012 S.F.s. FSF %U ffoJk Coun(y, NewYork LOT 9 15,005 SF ~0~ ~ ~¢ D~sE 1000 SecL 035.00 Block 01.00 Lot 004.000 (631) 325-2902