Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-31.-7-10
THIS MINOR SUBDIVISION IS FOR '2. LOTS ON ~'% ACRES LOCATED SCTM# 1000- '~ - 7 - lo ~t~ ~ckorci~,~e MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) Complete application received. ~,ri Application reviewed at work session Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised submission received Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewe'll location Notification to applicant to include on final map Sent to County Planning Commission ReceiDt of County Report Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public Hearing Approval'of subdivision -with conditions Endorsement of subdivision Fax: (516) 432-9367 ~ATHAN LEVNER Attorney at Law 21 Arizona Avenue Suite 207 Long Beach, Ny 11561 Office: (516) 432-8450 By Hand Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 August 13, 1991 Re: Thorp Minor Subdivision e..~-e~e_ ~ SCTM # 1000-031-7-10 Dear Sirs: This office is representing Mr. Edward Thorp and Mrs. Virginia Thorp, the owners of the above noted property, Enclosed herewith is an application for permission to subdivide the property into two parcels. The property is a parcel of +_2.3 acres in a residential zone allowing one acre plots. As you can see from the sketch, the applicants intend to subdivide the parcel into one lot of one acre and one slightly larger lot. The applicants do not intend to build on the lots at the present time. Enclosed is the following: 1. a check for the filing fee of $500 and the application fee of $1,000; 2. Twelve surveys; 3, Legal Description of the property (copy of deed); 4. Application for plat approval; 5. Form letter regarding drainage, grading and road construction; 6. Full Environmental Assessment Form; and 7. Copy of Tax Map showing area. The property consists of undeveloped land, it is my understanding that the $2,000 per lot fee in lieu of land is not due until preliminary approval. Should you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (516) 432-8450. NL:hs Enclosures Very truly ~a~f~tn-Levnei APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the To~vn of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies [or (tentative) (final) appyoval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law aud the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (I[ the applicant is not the oxvner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be ..Tb.Q.~lq Mindr Subdivision -.- 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule 'A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Sn£folk County Clerk's o[[ice as folloxvs ~50 Liber ...1.0.2..2./~. ............... Page .... :~ ................ On January 20, 1987. 10224 352 January 20, 1987 Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ........................ · Lib .......................... Liber Liber ...................... ~ .............. ; The area of the land is ..2.,.3... acres. All taxes xvhich are liens on the'land at the (late hereof have been' 7. The land is encnmhered by ...cio ........................................................ mortgage (s) as folloxvs: ~) llort...,tgc rct. u, dt:d ,, ..................... page tn or:qnlnl anlotln{ of $ .............. .a l.~unpaid amount $ ............ · ....... ~ of ........... pald amonnt $ ...................... hekl hy ......... of .............. unpaid amount $ .... ':': ........ 7. ~ ~eeld~y 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land.~gi~l{tK ........................ 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts . .R.e..q. id.ela.tial..R.-&0 ............... 10. No part of the land lles under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept for that portion be ond th ' ................... ~ e shore line of Lak.e. ~arion not included in this application. ' ........................... I1. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (iiilf~ (does not) lle in a Water District or Water Snpply District. Name of Dis- trict if wltl in District is N/A . 13. Water mains will be laid by ,.N/fi. and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by ....N/.A ................................. lines. · ............... and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said 15. Gas mains will be installed by ................ and (a) (no) c mrge w II be made for installing .................................. said mains. ' .... 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Ilighway system, annex Schedtde "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shou'n on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be cxistiug pnbllc streets in the Town of Southohl llighway syste n, annex Schednle "C" hereto to show same. ~8. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. \Vhere the plat shows ~,'oposcd streets u'hich :,re extensious .f streets on adjoining sub- division Inaps ~cretoforc filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said f'xisting maps at their conjnnctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedi.gs, the al,plies,t will offer pro.f of title as required by' Sec. 335 of the Meal Property Law. 21. Submit a copy · /~,roposed, ff deed for hits shou'i:~g all restricti.ns, covenants, etc. Schedule "D". N 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements ~vill be $. ·. ~ ..... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto aunexed and requests tbat the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . .0 ......... '.'~ years. The Performance Bond will be xvritten by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE April ........ ~ .............. 1~.. ~J~O.r~..&...%bPNP..¢..Y~g.%O~.~..%~FP... (Name of Applicant) (Signature and TitI~ 12 Norcross Street, Rockville (Address) Centre, NY STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . NASSAU ss: On the ...... .~./..~ ........ day of ......ApX~.l ................ ,19.9.I ....before me personally came ...................... to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ...h.? ....... executed the same. ~ ~u~, s~ ~ N~w ~ ~ ................... STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ............................ ss: On the ................ day ............ of ............... 19 ....... be[ore me personally came ........................ to me kuown, who being by me duly sxvorn (lid de- p.se and say that ............ resides at No ..................................................... ................................. that .......................... is the .......... the c.rporation (lescribed in aod which executed the f()regoing iustrnment; that ............ kuows the sea~ nf said c()rp()rati.u; that the seal affixed by order .f the board of directors of said corporation. :,,I that ............ signed .............. name tbereto hy like order. Notary Public T 14-16-2 (2/87)--7c 617.21 SEQR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: Th~ full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project ~yr, action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- there are aspects of a proiect that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. · Full EAF Components: The full £AF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAE completed for this proiect: [] Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and importa[nt impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant ira.pact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions THORP MINOR SUBDIVISION Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date 1 Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form Parts A through E. Answers to these questions w be considere?~ as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiomt~ information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION THORP MINOR SUBDIVISION LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) NORTH LANE, EAST MARION, SUFFOLK COUNTY NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR EDWARD A. THORP & VIRGINIA THORP ADDRESS 12 Norcross Street BUSINESS TELEPHONE 1516) 538-7982 CITY/PO Rockville Centre NAME OF OWNER (If different) ADDRESS ~S~A T E zIP CODE 11570 BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Subdivision of 2.3 acre property into one acre in size each. two plots of not less than Please Complete Each Question- Indicate N.A. if not applicabl~e A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [:]Urban [qlndustrial I-ICommercial []Forest IqAgriculture [-IOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 2.3 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? 8823. dy lo8.m ~Residential (suburban) C]Rural (non-farm) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 0 acres 0 acres 100 100 0 acres 0 acres 0 0 ~ acres 0 acres 0 acres 0 0 0 0 U a. Soil drainage: EqWell drained 90 % of ~ite ~]Moderately well drained 10 % of site [:]Poorly drained % of site b.Lartdlf anYclassificationagricultural landsystem?iS invoJve,~,~/hOWacres.manY(seeaCresl NYCRR°f soil are370).classified within soil group I through 4 of the NY~ 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? []Yes ;[]No a. What is depth to bedrock? n~r~ (in feet) _~ Approximate percentage of proposed prc~t sil~th slopes: [~0-10% 10 ]10-15% % 5. []15% or greater % 6. Is proiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? [-1yes [~No {~' [s project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes J~No 8. What is tl~e depth of the water table? ~.8 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? OYes []]:No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? []Yes I-INo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? i-lyes [~No According to Nc, w.q m~r~i~ w~_oort~ Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) I-lYes []No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? F-lYes ~]No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? 0-1Yes F~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Marion Lake b. Size (In acres) 6.2ti, 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [~Yes il]No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~]Yes ONo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? E3Yes I-3No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? E3Yes [~l~o I[ 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [~Yes [~4No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I~Yes []No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fiji in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controJled by project sponsor 2. b. Project acreage to be developed: 2. '~ acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 2 , 3 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N~- ; proposed ' .,one g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour1 p~ -h.h~nXupon acres. . acres ultimately. completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially (~ -, 0 0 0 Ultimately 0 0 0 0 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure NA height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ?~_~ ft. 3 2. How much 0 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? DYes I-1No ~]N/A a. If yes, for what intendeC purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? D-lYes DNo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? l-lYes DNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. $. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? D-lYes :~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of Construction 0 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated NA (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-lyes r-lNo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? D-lyes I~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 0 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~lYes il]No If yes, explain tons/c'ubig ya't~s. year, (including demolition). year. 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lYes [~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? D--]Yes ~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain E3Yes ~No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year f~od plain? DYes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~lYes [~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I-lYes [--[No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain I-1No i-lYes DNo 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? .. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I-lyes D-lYes I~No tons/month. years. [3b~o 19. Will 20. Will 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? I~Yes []No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity .~_~_ 23. Total anticipated water usage per day NA gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? D-lYes If Yes, explain project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [~Yes J[]No project produce operating noise exceeding the local ~ambient noise levels? D'lyes gallons/minute. J~]No I~lNo 4 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ~JYes []No City, Town, Village Planning Board J~]Yes r-iNo City, Town'Zoning Board fqYes [No City, County Health Department J~Yes Other Local Agencies I--lYes [~No Other Regional Agencies r-lyes [-1No State Agencies :J~Yes [3No Federal Agencies []:]Yes E3No Subdivision DEC determina$iom rec'd 4-~7-90 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? J~Yes I~No If Yes, indicate decision required: r-lzoning amendment [:]zoning variance I-Ispecial use permit J~]subdivision [3site plan I-lnew/revision of master plan i--iresource management plan fqother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? nr~o ~,~ ~ 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 2 single family homes 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? no chan~e 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? Q ~{m~l~ 'FRm{l~r hnmms 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? J~Yes r-INo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? single family homes and summer bungelows ! 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ',4 mile? ~Ves ENo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? o~e acre 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [:]Yes ~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? :~]Yes [qNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes [-1No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? i-lYes xl~]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I-lYes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. Il~ there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name' Edward A. Thorp Date -/I/Ctl If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceedin$ with ihis assessment. 5 Responsibility of gency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or iower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impa.ct. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action resuJt in a physicaJ change to the projec[$ite? nNO nYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t:'...,y umque or unusual land forms found on the site? (i,e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)l-lNO []YES · Specific land forms: 6 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] r-lyes []No L-] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []-] No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] l-lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I-]No IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) E]NO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? i~NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to co[umn 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: $. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? E3NO r-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the exte;~t that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Propose~l Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage faci[ities. · Other impacts: _C 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? I-INO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] l-lYes []No [] [] [-]Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I-1No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] l-lYes []No [] [] I--IYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes ~lNo [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] r-lyes []No · Proposed Action may ca~se substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? I-]NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ~INO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? []NO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources~ [NO Examples that would apply to column 2 The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact Can im3pac't'~e I ' ' :, Mitigated By Project Changel ~]Yes []No / ~]Yes I-'] No / []Yes ~--~No I-lyes []No I-]Yes []No []Yes I-~No []Yes I--]No [~]Yes ~]No []Yes ['-]No []Yes ~]No []Yes []No [~]Yes ~]No []Yes [~]No []Yes ]r-]No []Yes ~No [~Yes [~]No []Yes · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action.would disruptor prevent installation of agricultural land management systems {e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures {e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~ []NO ~IYES (If necessary, use the Visual E^F Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? r-INO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeolo§ical site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities~ Examples that would apply to column 2 []NO F-lyES _ ~_ ~ The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: I -~ 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ['-lYes [~No [] [] I-'lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] r-lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] i-]Yes []No [] [] []Yes I--INo [] [] I--lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ['-lyes [~]No [] [] []Yes' []No [] [] E3Yes E3No [] [] '[]Yes []No [] [] I~Yes []No 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? FIN• [OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? F-IN• [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? [:]NO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · 8lasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ' Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. ' Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ON• OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (La. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for.the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: 10 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] .3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change FIYes FIN• OYes r~No OYes J-]No []Yes ON( []Yes ON• [:]Yes []No []Yes [:]No []Yes [-IN~ [:]Yes []No []Yes []No [:]Yes [:]No []Yes []No OYes [-]No I-'lYes •No []Yes []N0 []Yes IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? DNO DYES £xamples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than'S% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I~Yes i--]No [] [] I--lYes F-INo [] [] I-lYes I--INo [] [] i--lYes [-]No [] [] I-lYes r-INo [] [] [~Yes f-INo [] [] E]Yes E]No [] [] I--]Yes I~No [] [] E3Yes ~No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ~INO I-lYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 _£ f Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibilily of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachmentsl 11 61_7.21_ Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual FAF Addendum SEQR .C This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question ] 1 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public [] [] [] [] [] observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State [] [] [] [] [] Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? [] [] [] [] [] · The State Forest Preserve? [] [] [] [] [] · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? [] [] [] [] [] · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding [] [] [] [] [] natural features? · National Park Service lands? [] [] [] [] [] · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic [] [] [] [] [] or Recreational? 1[ · Any transportation ~:orridor of high exposure, such [] [] [] [] [] as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate [] [] [] [] [] or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as [] [] [] [] [] scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? [] [] [] [] [] · County road? [] [] [] [] [] · State? [] [] [] [] [] · Local road? [] [] [] [] [] Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-~,~ V4-V2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? []Yes []No 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screen'ed by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes []No DESCRI'~-~~STING VISUAL ENVIIRON~~NT 4. From each item checked in question ], check those which generally describe the environment. surrounding Within '1/4 mile *! mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hmy [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] HOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: '1/2 mile []Yes ~--]No *1 miles []Yes []No *2 miles i-'lYes []Ho *3 miles []Yes []No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate, EXPOSURE 6. The annual number bf viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. COHTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At worksite [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [] [] 2 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Thorp Minor Subdivision SCTM # 1000-031-7-10 April 10, 1991 Gentle men: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alterations of existing structures are proposed. Very truly yours, ~'~"~ ZL. Edward A. Thorp Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer- to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence~ 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) Yes 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership abutting this parcel? Yes Yes 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, County, etc.) pending before to a different 5. Is there any application any other agency with regard project on this parcel? 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? 7. Does this property have a valid certificat~ of occupancy, if yes pleas.e submit a copy of same Yes Yes ~ Yes ~ I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied on by the Planning Board in considering this application. Signature o~ proffe~y/owner or authorized agent d Attachment to questionnaire for~'the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NASSAU On the q~ day of April , came Edward A. Thorp , ss: 19 91, before me personally to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. Notar~~ 10224 ?;352 Grantor's Acts--I,dividual or CorpOon. CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT--THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY. THIS INDENTURE, made the ~ 4z~ day of January , nineteen hundred and eighty-seven BETWF£N LOIS JOHNSON THORP, surviving tenant by the entirety of Frank S. Thorp, residing at Box 5, East Marion, New York 11939; ~0 ~ ~t~ 5¢ ' partyofthefirst pan. Md EDWARD A. THORP, VIRGINIA THORP, EDWARD A. THORP as Custodian for AARON D. THORP under the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act, EDWARD A. THORP as Custodian for REBECCA B. THORP under the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act, and EDWARD A. THORP as Custodian for BENJAMIN L. THORP under the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act, each residing at 12 Norcross Street, Rockville Centre, New York 11570, as joint tenants with.the right of survivorship; party oi tn secon~ pa~, WITNre,,~ETH, tMt the par~ of the first part, in consider~ion of Ten Dollars and ~her valuable consider~ion aid b the ~ny of the se~nd part, does hereby gr~t and release unto the paay o£ the s~qd ~, the hdrs ~r suc[~sors and assi~s of the party of the second.part forever,all of the reraa~nxng interes~ ~,Lttli}~ ~}~lo~ie~ ~'lSot~ l;l~tff~ buildings and improvemena thereon erected, slt~te, 1-ingandbeinginJtltti~East Mr~on, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New york bounded and descrxbed as follows: BEGINNING at a monument set on the notherly line of North Lane, 22.74 feet southerly from the southeasterly corner of Lot No. 188 shown on "Map of Gardiners Bay Estates- Section 3", filed in Suffolk county Clerk's office as Map No. 50831 running thence partly along North Lane and partly along said Lot 188, N. 33 1'20" E., 190 feet, m6re or less, to the shoreline of Marion Lake; thence easterly along said shoreline, 665 feet, more or less to land now or formerly of Lange; thence along said land two coursesl (1) S. 18 30'40" W., 65 feet, more or less; thence (2) N. 59 8'40" W., 20.47 feet to the easterly end of the northerly line of North Lane; thence along said line of North Lane, three coursesl (1) N. 82 31~20" W., 171.74 feet; thence (2) N. 86 27'10" W., 390.71 feet; thence (3) Due West, 146.07 feet to the point or place of beginning. Together with a Right-of-Way 30 feet in width over North Lane. Subject to ~o;enants and restrictions~ easements and rights-of-way as of record. Being part of the same premises conveyed to the grantor herein by a deed dated December 19, 1949 and recorded on December 19, 1949 in Liber 3028 at page 407. TAX MAP DESIGNATION Di,t. 1000 S~. 031~0 BIt ~ 70o Lot(~): 9100¢ TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any. of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein grauted unto the party o£ the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns oi the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law. covenants that the party o~ the first'part, will receive'the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trusf fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNF--~ WHF_.REOF~ th~.ty Of the first part has dui, executed this deed the day and year first above written. - RECEIVED IN PRESENCE OF: RF,~L ESTATE JAN 2 0 1987 TRANSFER TAX SUFFOLK cOUNq .... LOIS %0~HN,S,.?N THORP PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Ma~ S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P, O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 20, 1995 Virginia Thorp 12 Norcross Street Rockville Center. New York 11570 RE: Thorp Minor Subdivision SCTM# 1000-31-7-10 Dear Ms. Thorp: On February 9, 1995, the Planning Board received the outstanding application fee and miscellaneous information required to complete the above mentioned application. On February 14. 1995, the Planning Board reviewed the application materials and determined that proposed Lot Number 2 does not meet the minimum depth requirements for the R-40 Zoning District. I discussed this with William Moore. and advised him that if wished to proceed with the subdivision of the property, he must follow the procedure to go before the Zoning Board of Appeals in regard to a variance from the required specifications, The Planning Board will schedule the sketch determination upon receipt of a positive decision from the Zoning Board of Appeals, I apologize for the delay in responding to your notification that William Moore is no longer representing you in regard to this proposed subdivision. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above, Sincerely, /~ Planner cc: Zoning Board of Appeals Albert $. Krupski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President William G. Albertson Martin H. Garrell Peter Wenczel Town Hail 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Melissa Spiro, Planner FROM: Albert J. Krupski, Jr. ~ President, Board of Trustee~ RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision Edward and Virginia Thorp North side of North Lane, East Marion SCTM#31-7-10 The NYSDEC freshwater wetland boundary shown on the map as delineated by Steven Sandford on April 13, 1990 has not changed. AJK:jmd PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P, O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees FROM: Melissa Spiro Planner RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision Edward and Virginia Thorp North side of North Lane, East Marion DATE: March 20, 1995 Enclosed please find a copy of the map dated April 9, 1991, the above mentioned subdivision for your review. The NYSDEC freshwater wetland boundary is delineated by Steven Sanford on April 13, the wetland boundary has changed since it delineated. shown on the map as 1990. Please advise was originally for if enc. william D. Moore Patrlcla C. Moore MOORE & MOORE Attorneys at Law 3L5 Westphalia Road P.O. Box 23 Mattituck, New York 11952 Tel: (516) 298-5674 Fax: (516) 298-5664 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Ms. Melissa Spiro Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Thorp Minor Subdivision SCTM # 1000-031-7-10 Dear Ms. Spiro: Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $500.00 for the above referenced property and the authorization letter designating this firm as agents/attorneys. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company has completed a title search of this parcel and has certified that no Covenants and Restrictions are on record. Enclosed is a copy of the Special Search for your records. If there is anything else that you need to proceed with this subdivision, please do not hesitate to con~t us. V~rv/truly yours, PCM/mr Encls. cc: Mr. & Mrs. Edward Thorp OFidelity National Title TITLE NO. 2011401 SPECIAL SEARCH FIDELITY NATION{kL TITLE INS~CE COMPi~NY OF NEW YORK, hereby certifies to the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD that a search has been made of the records of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk for Covenants and Restrictions of record from 12/19/49 to Date against the following premises: Tax Map No. 1000-031.00-07.00-010.000 Owner of Record: EDWARD A. THORP, VIRGINIA THORP, EDWARD A. THORP as Custodian for AARON D. THORP under the Uniform Gift to Minors Act, EDWARD A. THORP as Custodian for REBECCA B. THORP under the Uniform Gift to Minors Act, and EDWARD A. THORP as Custodian for BENJAMIN L. THORP under the Uniform Gift to Minors Act, as joint tenants with the right of survivorship by Deed Liber 10224 cp 350 and Liber 10224 cp 352. the following were returned: Covenants & Restrictions: NONE Easements: 1 (Liber 7656 cp 453 to Long Island Lighting Company) This certificate is prepared for the limited purposes set forth herein and does not constitute an abstract of title nor set forth any defects, liens or encumbrances thereon. It is for the information of the party to whom it is certified only and no other person shall be entitled to rely upon any statements made herein. The liability of the Company hereunder shall not exceed the amount of the fee paid under either contract or in negligence and no policy of title insurance shall be issued hereunder. %TED: 5/15/94 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMP{kNY OF NEW YORK /- 'S)~N~J. -ODELL ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT ?ountry Road, Building D · Riverhead, New York 11901 · (516) 727-0600 · FAX: (516) 727-0606 June 24, 1994 Town of Southold Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Sirs= We hereby authorize the law office of Moore & Moore to represent us in all matters before the Town of Southold. Thank you. Very truly yours, Edward A. Thorp PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD sco'i-r L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 August 29, 1991 Nathan Levner 21 Arizona Avenue Suite 207 Long Beach, New York 11561 RE: Application for Edward and Virginia Thorp North Lane, East Marion SCTM9 1000-31-7-10 Dear Mr. Levner: To confirm the August 23rd telephone conversation you had with Melissa Spiro of this office, please note that the Planning Board awaits the following to complete the file for the above mentioned subdivision proposal: An additional application fee payment in the amount of $500.00. (The application fee is $1000.00 plus $500.00 per lot.) A letter from the owner of the property authorizing you to act as his agent throughout the subdivision process. A copy of the Covenants and Restrictions referred to in the deed for the property. Upon submission of the above, the Planning Board will proceed with their review of the subdivision proposal. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, J~ Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 August 29, 1991 Nathan Levner 21 Arizona Avenue Suite 207 Long Beach, New York 11561 RE: Application for Edward and Virginia Thorp North Lane, East Marion SCTM9 1000-31-7-10 Dear Mr. Levner: To confirm the August 23rd telephone conversation you had with Melissa Spiro of this office, please note that the Planning Board awaits the following to complete the file for the above mentioned subdivision proposal: An additional application fee payment in the amount of $500.00. (The application fee is $1000.00 plus $500.00 per lot.) A letter from the owner of the property authorizing you to act as his agent throughout the subdivision process. A copy of the Covenants and Restrictions referred to in the deed for the property. Upon submission of the above, the Planning Board will proceed with their review of the subdivision proposal. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, J~/ ' m~ Chairman ./ ED A, D OK pP..OpFEETy .~IJIZ',./E'S,'ED FOFZ_ V]~GtF,J l A'rTIq©CdP TQWN QF FDU-r;HOL~D, N,.M ........... A_~C 9, 1991