The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5815 lE4f~atA...., IT I ~(..c... "If IQ_"!;7-_2L_~,M-4~r6t-~n.- - 2./L.2... ~S3?D - {JH- r". {1'1)0 3 - tJe.w (YWd:tftc~ ~ ~ lwe.-t. ~ ,) LID/a, A s-t//J- j.R.M..J O~ 1# /02&>1"0 5 # dJ/cem .l..j:J-j6h II' - , . . APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman http://southoldtown.northfork.net Mailing Address: Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex /First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold, NY 11971 RECEIVi:D t-~ I( Lf S' fJ/ll MAR 2 2006 )i! ~{J r;.,",~~ .~ SOUI!Hild TL~.n U;..r- ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809. Fax (631) 765-9064 FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 2, 2006 Appl. No. 5815 - EDGEWATER II. LLC Property Location: 63735 C.R. 48, Greenport CTM 40-1-20.2 SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is a vacant lot in Greenport with 128 feet of frontage on the North Road and 150 feet along the Long Island Sound, a lot depth of 977 feet (east line) and 919 feet (west line). The approximate distance from the property line along the North Road to the top of the Sound biuff is 810 feet (east line) and 725 feet (west line). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's October 19, 2005 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100-30A.3, in its denial of an application to amend their request, for structural alterations above the second floor area of this proposed new dwelling. The reason stated by the Building Inspector for disapproving the amendment request is that the zoning code bulk schedule restricts the number of stories to 2-1/2, and the proposed amendment differs greatly from the pian approved under ZBA Appeal No. 5330 concerning the third floor construction area. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on January 26, 2006, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant revised his plans as shown on the 10/25/05 construction design of the proposed single-family dwelling, shown on the 'Job No. 223705' Plan, Sheets A1 and A2, prepared by Ira Haspel, Architect, P.C., reducing the size of the third level design to less than the original size (original size was for 990 square feet). REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant's home is situated on one of three parcels as a family compound, sharing a common drive. The architectural plans show a third-floor bedroom suite of 1,138 sq. ft. The ground floor footprint is 3,458 sq. ft., and the second floor covers 2,041 sq. ft. The presence of a third floor does not affect the compliance of the " Page 2 - February 2, 2006e Appl. No. 5815 - Edgewater II, LLC CTM Parcel 40-1-20.2 at Greenport . roofline with the 35-ft. limit Applicant states that the third floor was designed to comply with the Code definition of a half story, but presented no measurements or evidence to support the half story claimed. The Board will treat the matter of the area above the second floor as a request for a variance from the 2-1/2 story code restriction. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasibie for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The proposed house has an irregular rooftine made up of various sloping elements with numerous angles. As read from the plans, the maximum roofline is about 38 feet, while the median height of the structure is 35 feet, within the 35-ft. limit of the Code. The square footage of the third floor bedroom is less than 35 percent of the ground floor footprint, and the presence of the third floor does not affect the compliance of the roofline with the 35-ft height limit 3. The requested area variance is substantial since the overall area has been reduced from 6,449 square feet to 5,941 square feet, and sprinklers will be installed throughout the house. 4, The difficulty was created with the design and plan submitted by the applicant 5. There is no evidence that the grant of the variance will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district The house is approximately 500 feet from County Route 48 and will comply with all code-required side yard setbacks. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Dinizio, seconded by Chairwoman Oliva, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for and shown on the revised plans (Job Plan No. 2237505, Sheets A1 and A2) and Comparison Site Plan last dated 11-10-05, prepared by Ira Haspel Architect, P.S" subject to the following Conditions: 1, That the two green signs installed illegally on utility poles in front of the applicant's property be removed and installed in accordance with the town codes, and 2. That a comprehensive fire suppression system shall be installed and operative throughout the house at all times. (Same as condition written under ZBA #4968). This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Dinizio, Simon, and Weisman. Absent was: Member Goehringer. This ResolutNas duly adopted ~-O). _ ~71, & . 0JG\~ Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 01 !I11r /06 Approved for Filing (" \ .~~ APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ) Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairmaa James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning ~ " , #' Southold TowJl Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959. ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JULY 19, 2001 Appl. No. 4968 - EDGEWATER II. LLC Parcel No. 1000-40-1-20.2 STREET & LOCATION: 63735 C.R. 48, Greenport DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: July 12, 2001 FINDINGS OF FACT PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is a vacant lot in Greenport with frontage of 128 feet on the North Road and 150 feet on the Long Island Sound, with depths of 977 feet (east) and 919 feet (west). The approximate distance from the North Road property line to the top of the Sound Bluff is 810 feet (east) and 725 feet (west). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Inspector's May 1, 2001 Notice of Disapproval, denying a permit to build a new single-family dwelling because the proposed house: (1) has a third story, in violation of the 2-1.12 story limit in Code Section 100-32, and (2) has an elevator shaft higher than the 35-foot limit in Code Section 100-32. AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant requests a variance authorizing construction of a single-family house [with upper floor area shown on architectural plans dated 7/9/01 prepared by Ira Haspel Architect, P.C. (Job ref, 202101)]. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION. DESCRIBED BELOW: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspection, the Board makes the following findings: 1. The architectural plans show a third-floor bedroom suite of 990 sq. ft. The ground floor footprint is 4357 sq, ft. and the second floor covers 2415 sq. ft. Applicant states that the third floor was designed to comply with the Code definition of a half story, but presented no measurements to support that statement. The Board will treat the matter of the third story as a request for a variance, 2. The proposed house has an irregular roofline made up of various sloping elements with numerous angles. As read from the plans, the maximum roof height is about 37-1/2 feet while the average from eaves to peak is about 32 feet, within the 35-foot limit of the Code. The square footage of the third-floor bedroom suite is less than 25 percent of the ground floor footprint, and the presence of the third floor does not affect the compliance of the roofline with the 35-foot limit. 3. The proposed house has a large chimney that appears, from the plans, to be about 41- 1/2 feet high. Chimneys higher than 35 feet are permitted by Code section 100-230(D)(1). The height of the elevator shaft is equal to the highest roof peak, and several feet lower than the chimney. Elevation drawings show the chimney as a prominent feature while the top of the elevator shaft is a less prominent element of the irregular roofline. .. l' ,~, J . ) ~ (.,:! Page 2 - July 19, 2001 . ~ ZBA Appl. No. 4968 - Edgewater n, LLC ~ _'_'-2<>.2 "...."'" ) . 4. The proposed house is set back about 500 feet from the North Road and has side yards of 20 and 25 feet. There is no evidence that the design or siting of the house poses any threat to the character of the area. 5. Based on the foregoing factors, the Board concludes that grant of the requested variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. 6. There is no evidence that grant of the requested variance will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions. 7. The action set forth below is the minimum necessary to enable applicant to build a house in accordance with his plans while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION/ACTION: On motion by Member Collins, seconded by Member Dinizio, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the application as applied for, authorizing construction for the house as proposed with a third-floor bedroom suite and e -sl1aft""snown chitectural house plans dated 7/9/01, SUBJECT TO THE CON ON that ention system must be operative throughout the house at I ti es. ( in d 0 0 r s p r ink 1 e r s y s t em. This action does not authorize or condone a urrent or future use, setbac feature of the subject property that violates the Zoning Code, 0 uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Goehringer (Chairman), Dinizio, Tortora, and Collins. This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0). -- r~ECl!.IV ED AND FILED. T THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLE DATE'" \9-4(0\ HOUR IO'.o<i C'~~()~ Town Clerk, Town of SculLold__ \ ~ . 'j ... ........ Lydia A Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer George Horning Ruth D. Oliva .... Vincent Orlando . \ Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net APPEALS B'OARD MEMBERS' \ , , \ ...,,,. .~-,...._-<.". '2Qm . \ BOARD OF APPEALS . \ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . .', FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION , '.:,,:...-:J MEETING OF JULY 10, 2003 Appl. No. 5330 - EDGEWATER II. LLC Property Location: 63735 C.R. 48, Greenport; CTM 40-1-20.2. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is a vacant lot in Greenport with 128 feet of frontage on the North Road and 150 feet along the Long Island Sound, a lot depth of 977 feet (east line) and 919 feet (west line). The approximate distance from the property line along the North Road to the top of the Sound bluff is 810 feet (east line) and 725 feet (west line). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's March 11, 2003 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100-32, in its denial of a building permit to construct a new dwelling with a third story, instead of the code limitation of 2-1/2 stories and/or exceeding 35 ft. maximum height. (Note: Building Penmit #27980-Z was voided by the Building Department based on a different dwelling design and construction details.) r FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on June 19, 2003, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant has revised the construction design of the proposed single-family dwelling as shown on the 'Job No. 209902' Plan, Sheets A2-1 and A2-2, prepared by Ira Haspel, Architect, P.C. The third level design was revised by applicant to 1138 sq. ft. for the third-floor bedroom suite, instead of the previous request of 990 sq. ft. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submittedand-persooal-iASPeetioos, the-Bearfl-mal<cs the .fellewing findings: 1. Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The architectural plans show a tliita~1I00roearo6m-Sillteon~IT8-sq. fC-Tne ground floor footprint is 3,458 sq. ft., and the second floor covers 2,041 sq. ft. The presence of a third floor does not affect the f ... ~ .... '. j Page 2 - July 10, 2003 Appl. No. 5330 - Edgewater II, LLC 40-1-20.2 at Greenport compliance of the roofline with the 35-ft. limit. Applicants state that the third floor was designed to comply with the Code definition of a half story, but presented no measurements to support the half story. The Board will treat the matter of the third story as a request for a variance. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The proposed house has an irregular roofline made up of various sloping elements with numerous angles. As read from the plans, the maximum roofline is about 38 feet, while the median height of the structure is 35 feet, within the 35-ft. limit of the Code. The square footage of the third floor bedroom is less than 35 percent of the ground floor footprint, and the presence of the third floor does not affect the compliance of the roofline with the 35-ft. limit. 3. The requested area variance is substantial since 35 percent of the house is based on a variance to complete the third floor. 4. The difficulty was self-created when the applicant designed the house with a third floor which did not conform to Code requirements. 5. There is no evidence that the grant of the variance will have an adverse effect or impact on physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed house is set back approximately 520 feet from County Route 48 and has all required side yard setbacks. Based on the foregoing factors, the Board concludes that granting of the requested variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Chairwoman Tortora, and duly carried, to GRANT the variance as applied for and shown on the revised plans ('Job No. 209902' Plan, Sheets A2-1 and A2-2) prepared by Ira Haspel, Architect, P.C. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property tbalmaY_llioJate theZoning-Code,~such uses, setbacks and-GlI1eJ'-- features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortora (Chairwoman), Orlando, and Oliva. (Absent were Member Goehringer and Member Horning.) This Re~iV~ ~. - . . Lydia A~~mlirwoman~APprovedfor Filing 71,;79'103 .. .. LEGAL NOTICE SOUTH OLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, JANUARY 26, 2006 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold. New York 11971-0959, on THURSDAY. JANUARY 26, 2006: 10:45 A.M. EDGEWATER II, LLC #5815. A variance is requested under Section 100- 30A.3, bulk schedule, based on the Building Inspector's October 19, 2005 Notice of Disapproval concerning a request to amend a building permit, and requesting variance relief exceeding the variance limitations granted under Appeal No. 5330 concerning the height of a dwelling which irregular roofline exceeded 35 feet at its highest point and included a bedroom designed in space above the second-floor. This variance is for a third design, modifying and expanding the floor space above the second floor, exceeding the code limitation of 2-1/2 stories, and modifying and adding roof angles which exceed the code limitation of 35 feet. Location of Property: 63735 C.R. 48 (a/k1a North Road or Middle Road), Greenport; CTM 40-1-20.2. .The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office (631) 765-1809, or Linda.Kowalski@Town.southold.ny.us. Dated: January 6, 2006. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RUTH D. OLIVA, CHAIRWOMAN By Linda Kowalski It. . FORM NO.3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: October 19, 2005 TO: Ira Haspel ale CohenlEdgewater II 126 East Main Street Bay Shore, NY 11706 "1.li'> 611~ Please take notice that your application dated October 14, 2005 For an amendment to an existing permit at Location of property 63735 CR 48. Greenport. NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 40 B1ock~ Lot 20.2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed amendment. on this conforming parcel in the R-80 District. is not permitted pursuant to Article IlIA Section 100-30A3. which states: "No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the Low-Densitv Residential R-40 District unless the same conforms to the requirements of the Bulk Schedule and ofthe Parking Schedule with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk schedule restricts the number of stories to 2 v,. Although the proiect was granted a variance for a proposed third stOry (Appeal # 5330), the proposed amendment greatlv differs from the plan approved bv the Zoning Board of Appeals. , , \ Autliorize ature CC: file, Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. '. " , , , APPLI~ON TO THE SOUTHOLD TOW~ARD OF APPEALS (;) For Office Use 011/Y Fee::) Y-m./Filed By: V-- ~ Date Assjgned/Assj~JJnH~llt No. S5/-l- I Office Notes: -, f\!(Ii! ~ ~ Parcel Location: House No~? 735Street C-IL '18 Hamlet GI'eu-Jpcrrr , ---'. SCTM 1000 Section /.jO B1ockiLot(s)20."l. Lot Size ,,/}C. Zone District /2. ~" I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINA nON OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: /0- 1'1- or Applicant/Owner(s):....744 H/:J::>f'EL. / t!t?.#Uv / €D6&4M-n.7L :a: /h2-CI(, n-c r' / Mailing Address: /2-fe; bSf IY}q,;" Sired- / -&'7 Shl>-T'e Ivy /170t, Telephone: NOTE: Ir applicant is uot the owner, state if applicanl is owner's attorne}', ngent, architect, builder, contract vendee, etc. Authorized Representative: PA-r'/lUC/4 c' rnOo~e ~-S~. Address: Sf D 2.0 /YJ"ffN I2.o4-D &>3/- 7t,.~- L.../33'P / /97/ ~C>L..J:) /'vy Telephone: Please specify who you wisb correspondence to be mailed to, from tbe above listed nam,es: D Applicant/Owner(s) )iAuthorized Representative D Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 10 //'1/ bc} . FOR: ... ~ Buiiding Permit D Certificate of Occupancy D Change of Use D Permit for As-Built Construction D Pre-Certificate of Occupancy Otlle.. *' /)., -I D (t./u/.,) fl':2 ("Nor) A- 3 (/1/'1/01 ~. 5:1-1 (tllf~ .'0 . Provision of the Zouing Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article J:II' A Section 100-30 Subsection A 3 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: iliA Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. D A Variance due to lack of access required by New Yorl{ Town Law-Section 2BO-A. D Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section o Reversal or Other A prior appeal ~as D has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. Year mol/)3 03:30 ' , - . / ~~I'J Reason for Appeal Continued Zoning Board of Appeals reo Edgewater II, LLC Pursuant to Town Law section 267b-3 the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals is to analyze and assess the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant against the potentially deleterious effects that a grant of the relief requested would have on the health, safety and welfare of the effected neighborhood or community. In performing this balancing test, the Zoning Board is charged with the responsibility to consider the five factors enumerated in Town Law Section 267b-3(b). The variance should be granted for the following reasons: The design of the house, as time goes on, is modified with the needs of the family. A Building permit was issued for the house, as approved by ZBA variance #5330, however, when the design changed the building department directed the owner to seek another variance. The family began in 2001 and has repeatedly needed to amend their variance request due to the change of design. 1. No undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties, if the variance is granted. George Cohen (or his wife) is the Managing Member of the following properties: Edgewater I, LLC which owns the westerly adjacent parcel (lot 20.1), Edgewater II, LLC (subject property), and Edgewater III, LLC which is the easterly adjacent parcel (lot 21). The parcels are over two acres in size and heavily wooded. The residence is set back from the bluff 100 feet and almost 500' from the road so the house will not be visible from the road. The height of the residence will not impact the neighbors because the parcel is shielded by the adjacent Edgewater I and III parcels. AS with the prior variance appeal, the design of the third floor has changed; the original plan has been reduced in square footage and changed with regard to proportions. Given the unique design and architectural style of the house a more generic variance would avoid the need to return now three times to the ZBA for height variances. Since there are no impacts on adjacent properties and the owner will conform to NYS Code which requires sprinklers for a three story house, the ZBA's concerns continue to be addressed. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant can not be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The house has been re-designed, after great deliberation, with - . /~\< ~ new dimensions. This request is a third variance: The Board granted a variance in 2001, however, due to the redesign of the house the building department required that you review and grant a second variance (#5330), the redesign now requires a third variance. The conditions of your variance were adopted and the house will have sprinklers throughout the house. (Now this requirement is in the NYS Fire Prevention and Building Code) The owner has recently completed the construction of the adjacent homes and has redesigned this home to meet with her current needs. 3. The area variance is not substantial The application of the balancing test weighs in favor of the grant of the variance. The property is unique in size (3 acres) and that the family controls both adjacent properties (9 cumulative acres in total). The control of three parcels present a unique opportunity for the family to plan their "dream home". As the third home to be constructed, the design is constantly unfolding. This presents a dilemma for the building department since the third floor relies on the variance. Since the variances are not substantial, we would respectfully request that more generic height variance be granted for the volumes rather than the specific design. 4. The variance will have physical or environmental district. no adverse effect or impact on the condit~ons in the neighborhood or The house has experienced a change in design but with no impact on the environment. The ground floor footprint has been reduced sq. ft. The changes have been primarily to the vertical design and placement of the house. 5. The alleged difficulty was not self-created. The applicant wishes to design a unique house on a very unique property. The architectural design is intended to create a "tree house" effect in the woods, the woods have been preserved and the three properties have been developed with a common plan. 6. The variance requested is the minimum variance practicable given the personal benefits anticipated by the applicant. We respectfully request any fur:~~):felief that .' >)./~. 1 ___ - /'j-. ,/ ~c-'.' . that the appeal be granted, together with is deemed necessary and reasonable. I j si~at1.l.re patricia C. Moore, as for Edgewater II, LLC attorney . . State of New York ) )ss ) ay NtJJ- 20iJ)- County of Suffolk Swo to this qt- BET~V ^ rrnK1. -. Pvbl,\; :;1,1:-' u' N..'M No_ Q1Pl c, :\~Jf;38 C.:~=~~~~~~ ZQ()<;'. . , I 6b\S '~ -. -, . fJ; J ~IS o PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Please include with Z.B.A. Application) Applicant(s): t?Db b-?1/I'h--er?- ~ LL~ , L If building is existing and alterations/additions/renovations are proposed: A. Please give the dimensions and overall square footage of extensions beyond existing building: Dimensions/size: Square footage: B. Please give the dimensions and square footage of new proposed foundation areas which do not extend beyond the existing building: Dimensions/size: Square footage: II. Inand is vacant: . nr_ ~ Please give dimensi~ns and overall square footage of new constructio.~ $:1 - 'J- .J Dimension/size: /0-1'5 - or V5. 7"'1 ~d Square footage: /hvtJ ~V/I-IP/N{r-I'~/'T I::>::>C/Fl> Height: 0' II%... v,. b2 ~ /2>W Ilre.. S,9',/1 $1P'r 1/6 . '""TJW bCl ~ ~lf'f ~Fr: ill. Purpose and use of new con&lruction requested in this application: c;/nr~~ tJtv-r~ IV. Additional information about the surrounding contours or nearby buildings that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): ~/L-r ;/)/TIPOC/A/ D 6~ 3 ~~ca.~ ( 5 11'1 ~ ~L4"d T, cd. Ci 'I11'7r.... WLAJt" V. Please submit seven (7) photos/sets after staking comers of the proposed new construction. 7/02 rr-/bducJ f mf'p ~c1 ~ k fJ/aAL- fHfOMcI b'f k -tI~yeJ I /J-yr./ulcd- Please note: Further changes, afler submitting the above information, must be placed in writing and may require a new Notice of Disapproval to show changes to the initial plans. If additional time is needed, please contact our office, or please check with Building Department (765-1802) or Appeals Department (765-1809) if you are not sure. Thank you. .~lon lO'l'" IlIod<lr.it .......Bb<k/&do."" (21) -- ~.~ >cI1o.Hbtt1ttUoo ilJ<'r"" Ol,tr~' u'" <.N!..ESS DRUN OTHERW'SE, '" PROPERIlES 0 frn>PI""'tll"" --. -. "',,,,Di>f"dl;,,,, ~-R__ '" W'THIN m, FOlLOWINC DISTRICTS, SCHOOl , SE.ER un 1"'...llI..~,t 1I.... --1-- ~"t"'k~OIot,~t 1I"" -~ST -- ,., ~. ~rIJRANT --- ~tOl.trl<tll.... --l-_ -.:. rn,t,~' 1I.. - - il -- lIGHT lATER eo. IlEFUSE ---- I'<>1lllott1ttllno --p-- lo..."",..-llI.t,~t U.. -WW-_ _'-'.'~E usn;IATER NOTICE MilINTEN~NCE, ~LTER~T10N, SALE OR DISTRIlUTlONOFiltlYPORlIONOFTHt: SlH'FClLKC(lUNTrTAX MilPIS PRQHlBI1ED W1TfIOUT IRHTEN PfRUISSION rx Tit; REALPImPERHTAXseRV~AGENCr. ,-~ h. 12.1Aldlor12.LA , C<ulIJU.. ,-~ ~~--r---- ....J FOR PCl ~ 1 ;.~,;~ I ' GP)r SEESEC,NO.Qll --------r-lINE ~ , , .~ 6.9 ~\:! CCONTYOf Sl.6FOlk COLtIlTY,OF SUFFOlk IlII..ETPO.HPlllJ;l COJNTYOF SUFFOI.k 22.1 11.2A , "" '9~~t o q ~ ~ ~e. y ... ~ I , 10.~AlcJ ~ \ ~ ~'~\'11, .... '" "6 ~ 'd ~ ,.... , Nl2,,2~J8l ~\NJ<SI l' E2~''l~'444'J ,.'tI'V EH" \l. S.'0. ." .,,~, l/'> ,.:; --.; ?,,\~ J-";""O-lo "'-, "'- '" ~ ]25 OS:l2~ 0-';' ('''.,nISl . . .....'V ,0 \, S$)~.", ".."" "l ~ ~,~~:,~;:.~8 :;A'!.<F ~ I '\ ~ # . 6.JA '.1 J6.7AIC) sa:.P<<l.IJO ! ~ # ~ 5 2J.5Alcl \ \\~ ~ , , " \ \~ ~ It:, \ \ \ I ~i~~~~~:';~~5~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLO N57'4,',O'E lOIQ,!S VILLAGE OF GREENPORT SEE SEC. t<<}. O~5 _LOI,,", __MOo.,,", (211 - -,~ ~.~ o ~ltotrIct"" CO" _a1'~"""l'.. lH..ESS DRAIN OnEAIIIS!:, OU PI'lOP€RTIES Flnlllotr!c'ln. --F_~ _or,fflctll.. --R__ '" WITHIN m, FOLLQWING DISTRICTS, -, In ~.~ ..r. ~_.ikIt --1-- 1I':tlrlcdlllo"''''llrle -IlST-_ ~, " NOTICE IlIAINTENANCE,ALTERATlON,SALEOR ~