The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-31.-2-20Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 24, 1985 Mr. Garrett A. Strang P.O. Box 1412 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Herbert Mandel East Marion Dear Mr.Strang: In response to your letter of June 17, regarding Mr. Mandel'.s proposal for two (2) attached two-family residences for a total of eight units, the Board has reviewed the application. It is the consensus of the Planning Board not to endorse this proposal since it exceeds the current density by more than double. The Board would be in favor of a residential use, however, if it meets the current zoning density. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.4' CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary GARRETTA. STRANG ARCHITECT JUN [985 MAIN ROAD. P.O. BOX 1412 SOUTHOLD. NEWYORK IIB71 June 17, 1985 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairperson Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Herbert Mandel, Rocky Point Road, East Marion Dear Mr. Orlowski and Members of the Board: As of this date, I have not heard from you in connection with letter written on April 22, 1985 on behalf of my client, Mr. Herbert Mandel regarding the proposed project at the above location. I asked the Town, at that time, to reconsider this application based on the fact that it is truly "affordable housing" for the Town of Southold. Please be good enough to respond at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. GAS/b Enc. Very truly yours, cc: H. Mandel GARRETT A. STRANG ARCHITECT MAIN ROAD. P.O BOX 1412 SOUTHOLD. NEW YORK 11971 April 22, 1985 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road $outhold, New York 11971 Attention: Bennett Orlowski, Chairperson Re: Herbert Mandel, Rocky Point Road, East Marion Dear Mr. Orlowski and Members of the Board: Subsequent to our meeting of April 15, 1985, I have conferred with Mr. Mandel regarding his proposed project. As I am sure you are aware, this application was made to the Board when six (6) units would have been a permitted use under zoning. We are seeking relief to have eight (8) units, in order to make the pro- posal economically viable. In addition, my client would be giving up a valuable piece of industrial-zoned property, asking only that the Town increase the density by two (2) units; and under the present "C-1" zoning, there are many permitted uses, which would be less than desirable in the midst of a residential district. Mr. Mandel has indicated to me that he would be willing to incur the cost for a rendering and/or additional plans, so that the Board could evaluate the pro- ject on esthetics. There is a need for affordable housing units in the area. Based on today's construction costs, interest rates and the tax base in the Town of Southol~, a new homeowner is faced with approximate carrying costs of $1,000- per month. (A $65,000 mortgage @ 13.5% for 30 years = $744.52; a conservative tax payment of $200.00 per month = $944.52). My client would be offering housing at far more reasonable prices. It is time for the Town to consider alternatives such as this project and be more flexible in evaluating each project on the merits, rather than strict enforcement of the Zoning Code. My client asks that you reconsider his application based on the above and advise us of your findings. Thank you for your cOurtesy and cooperation. Very truly yours, GAS/~ Garrett A. Strnag, R.A. cc: Herbert Mandel GARRETT A. STRANG .hPk 6 ' 985 MAIN ROAD. P.O BOX 1412 SOUTHOLD. NEW YORK 11971 516-765-5455 April 22, 1985 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Bennett Orlowski, Chairperson Re: Herbert Mandel, Rocky Point Road, East Marion Dear Mr. Orlowski and Members of the Board: Subsequent to our meeting of April 15, 1985, I have conferred with Mr. Mandel regarding his proposed project. As I am sure you are aware, this application was made to the Board when six (6) units would have been a permitted use under zoning. We are seeking relief to have eight (8) units, in order to make the pro- posal economically viable. In addition, my client would be giving up a valuable piece of industrial-zoned property, asking only that the Town increase the density by two (2) units; and under the present "C-1" zoning, there are many permitted uses, which would be less than desirable in the midst of a residential district. Mr. Mandel has indicated to me that he would be willing to incur the cost for a rendering and/or additional plans, so that the Board could evaluate the pro- ject on esthetics. There is a need for affordable housing units in the area. Based on today's construction costs, interest rates and the tax base in the Town of Southol~, a new homeowner is faced with approximate carrying costs of $1,000~ per month. (A $65,000 mortgage @ 13.5% for 30 years = $744.52; a conservative tax payment of $200.00 per month = $944.52). My client would be offering housing at far more reasonable prices. It is time for the Town to consider alternatives such as this project and be more flexible in evaluating each project on the merits, rather than strict enforcement of the Zoning Code. My client asks that you reconsider his application based on the above and advise us of your findings. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. GAS/b cc: Herbert Mandel Very truly yours,.~ Garrett A. Strnag, R.A. Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 17, 1985 Mr. Garrett A. Strang P.O. Box 1412 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposal for Herbert Mandel at E.Marion Dear Mr. Strang: Please let this confirm the recommendation of the Southold Town Planning Boar~ regarding the above mentioned proposal, of the April 15, 1985 meeting. The Planning Board is not in favor of the proposal for two(2) attached two-family residences. The Planning Board agreed that a residential use would be acceptable providing that the density is in conformance with the current zoning. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary TO ,D S Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 10, 1985 Mr. Garrett Strang P.O.Box 1412 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan Herbert Mandel at E. Marion Dear Mr. Strang: The Southold Town Board has recently adopted a moratorium on site plans in B,B1,C, and C1 zones, which became effective on October 3, 1985. Therefore, the Planning Board cannot take any further action on the site plan known as, "Herbert Mandel", located at East 'Marion, until authorized by the Town Board. Enclosed is a copy of the moratorium for your review. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board dms enc. VASILIA MORAITIS 5325 Rocky Point Road East Marion N.Y.11939 March 25. 1985 Town of Southold Planing Board Southold N.Y. RE: Rental of Herbert Mandel Rocky Point Road East Marion Gentlemen: I would like to place my protest against the application of Mr. Herbert Mandel to change the zoning of his parcel of one one acre on Rocky Point Road East Marion from Industrial to residential. Such a change every conceivable parcel triment of the rest of serve the character of the and enviromentally safe. if approved will create a precedent of changing to enrich few indivituals to the de the community which is truggling to pre area and our water supply adequate Mr. Mandel knew before he bought the parcel that it was zoned industrial.Let him live with that obligation. We had a garage there before which was needed in the community. Cordially VASILIA MORAITIS TOWi~ OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRON/~ENTAL ASSESS.~ENT - PART PROJECT I ~-F OR/4AT ION any aa~icional information you believe will be needed to ::molete PARTS 2 an~ 3. · . so tn~ica:a ~ saecify eeaq in~:ance. at East Mar~on - (~(~e) 433 Main StYeot ,~O0,qE33 -':~0 :IA::E OF .~PoLr. Ct,gT: Greenport, New York 11901 SU ~..~ ES~ PHOto;; 516'-477-2223 Garrett A. Strang for Mandel. Southold New York 11971 ConstructiOn' of Two"(2) attached two-Family Residences Total of Eioht (8) Dwellinq Units- 4 in each Buil'din~ A. $IT~ ~-Y.$C&IPTi0:~ "" '"-' ~ · (;hys(~l set:ir.; a~ over, Il p~jec:, bo:~ develo:~ ~.d un~avelcoed areas) ........ ~... ~., ~?~,~....;... . -._ ' 1. General Character of tae lend: Generally unifom sl0oe X , 5ener~ily ~even and ~iling or.ir~gu{ar Y~sen: ?and ~se: U~an .., . ., Agriculture , 0%qer Ap;roximaca acr~ege: acres 0 !ores ........ ._r.. After Ccmoleblon :{ac_-r Sur-.'3ce ;~a O ~cr-.s 0 acr~.s ,Jnve"..e:a ced eaten or fill) O ~cr~s 0 tcr~s surr!cls ~ ICrIS .~ lcr~s ~t~e? (:,t~ica:~ :yoe] !ores Sand / Gravel 7. 8. g. 11. 13. 14. Approximate percentec, e of proposed project site with slopes: O-lO: 100~; 10-15: greater Is project contiguous to, or contain a building or site listed on the ~(ational RegistJr o? Historio Places) Yes X No What is the depth to the water table? +.1 0 feet ·. 07 hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? .. Yes X"tlo Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified es .threatened. endencered - Yes ~ Ilo, according to - Identify each species . Are there any unique or unusual land for~s on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - Yes -× No..(Describe Is the'project site presently used by the co~-unit7 or neighborhood as an open space or'rec~eatfon area - Yes ~ No. ' · - Does"~he present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be Important to .the coca, unity? Yes × ~)o · - .. Strea~ within or contiguous to project area: a. t(ame of stream and name of river to which it is tributary N Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous ~ project area: ........... - ........ a. Na~ ~.A. ; b. Size (in acres) ~hat is the dominant lan~ use and zoning classification within a 1/~ mile radius of the project {e.g. single family residential, R-~) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). Single Family Residential "A" 1% Story PROJECT DE$CRIPTIDN 1. Phys~ca! dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage armed by ~roject sponsor ~" acres ...... :;:-.~:::' :~. .: b. Project acreage developed: . ~ acres initially; ~ acres ultimately.... ~ . ~: .. .... ' . . Project acreage to r~main undeveloped .. ~ . :~ Length of project, in miles: ~.A. (if appr~priate) If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: age ~.A. $ developed acreage f. tlurr~er of off-st~t parking spaces existing N.A; I proposed 20' ' ' ' Maxi~u~ vehicular trips generated per hour 2 [upon completion of project) If residential: Number and type of housing units: -. One'Fa~ily Two Family Muiti~le Family Condominiu~ building'square foot Initial 4 Ultimate 4 If: Orientation Neighborhood-¢ttg-Regiona) Estimated Emoloyment Co.~ercial N ~A. N.A. Industrla) " " To~I height of' tallest proposed structure ,~. Ho~ much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be re~oved from the site - 0 tons ~ cubic yard: 3. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, g~oun~ covers) will be removed from site - 0 acres. 4. Will any mature forest (over I00 years old) or other locally-Important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes X .~o g. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that re~oved during construction? X Yes Eo If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~ months, (including demolition). If multi-phasQd project: a. Total number of phases anticipated ' _No. - [.~ b. Anticipated date of co~ence~ent phase 1 month year {including _.~ demolition) ....... c. Approximate completion date final phase ~nth year. .. · ~. Is phase 1 financially dependent'on subsequent phases? Yes No 8. ~ill blasting occur during const~Jction? Yes ~ No . "- g. ~ber of jobs generated: during construction 6 I after project is complete 1 10. Hu~er of jobs eli=looted by this project 0 .. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes X No. If yes, explain.: 1~. a. Is surface er subsurface liquid waste disGosal involved? × Yes ....__No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) Sewage c. If surface disposal name of streak into which effluent will be dlscha~ed ~.~. 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, stre~s, bays or other surface wa!e~ays be increased or decreased by proposal? Yes X No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year t~ood plain? Yes × ~o 15. a. Ooes project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes X No b. If yes, will an ~xisting solid waste disposal facility be used? Yes No : '.~' c. If yes, give name: _ ; location d. ~.lill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or in~o a sanitary landfill? ~ Yes X N 16. Will project use herbicides er pesticides? Yes X ~o 17. Will project routinely produce odors' (~ore than one hour per day)? Yes X ~o . · '~'-,. 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local a~,bieoce noise levels? Yes X No lg. Will project result in an increase in ener~y use? Yes × .No. If yes, indicate type(s) If water supply is fro~ wells indicate pu~ping c~pacity Total anticipated water usage per day l~O0 ~als/day. Zoning: a. What is dominant'toning cIassificaticn of site? b. Current s~ecific zoning classification of site c. Is proposed use consistent with present zoning? 1 0 ~irgals/minute. C-! General Industrial Samc No Ifno, indicacedesired zoning M- Liqht Multi Family a. Is any Federal per~i~ required? Yes X No b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? ¢. Lo~al and Regional approvals: Approval Required lies, ~lo) (Type) Yes ,.,X* No Submittal Approval (Date) (Date) City, Toy?n, Village Board Y Re-Zone City, Town, Village Planning ~oard Y Site Plan City, Town, Zoning Board Y Density City, County Health Oeeartzent ¥ Other local agencies ~' ' Other regional agencies N State Agencies 'N Federal Agencies ~N C. INFOR,~ATIG~GtL DETAILS Attach any additional info.alien ~s ~ay be needed to clarify your project. If th)re are or may be any adverse Impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitiga~.e or avoid them.~.~ .TITLe'*: .................. G~rrett A. Stranq~ Architect REP~ESE~NTING: Herbert Mande 1 hATE: March 4, 1985 FEB 28 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OI VITAL S1Al ISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Dated: February 28, 1985 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617, of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that. the action described below is a Type I action and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION PetitiOn of Herbert Mandel for a Change of Zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District on certain property located on the north side of N.Y.S. Route 25, East Marion, New York. Further information may be obtained by, contacting Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk, Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. copies to: Charles T. Hamilton, DEC, Stony Brook Commissioner Williams, DEC, Albany Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Planning Board~ T. A. Rumph Associates, P.C, for Herbert Mandel JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR O1. VITAL SIAIISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 530y~ Main l~oad P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 26, :1985: WHEREAS, Herbert Mandel has heretofore applied to the Southold Town Board for a Change of Zone from "A" Residential' and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District on certain'property located on the north side of N.Y.S. Route 25, East Marion, New York~ NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conserva- tion Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed is a Type I action and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Town Clerk shall file and circulate such determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. 3. That the Town Clerk iminedia~ely notify the applicant, Herbert Mandel, of this determination, and further request said~applicant to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, all in accordance with said law, rules and code. ' Judith ~. Terry Southold Town Clerk TO~¥N OF SOUTHOLD ~F EHVIRO;IMENTAL ASSESSMENT :'PART I Project In fo rn~ition NOTICE: This document ~ destined to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the e~)viecr~,~nt. Please cor~.lete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the a~plication for approval and may be subject to further verification and.public review. Provide any additional infor~nation you believe will be needed to complete PARTS 2 and 3. It is expecteo t,nat cc~oletien of the EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investiqation. If information requirino such additional work is unavai~able, so indicate and s~ecify each instance· · NA~qE OF PROJECT: ADDRESS AND NA~tE OF APPLICANT: (Street) (P.O.) 1% (Sta.e) {Zip) NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different) (State) (Zip} DESCRIPTI0g OF PROJECT: (Briefly describe type of project or action) (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTIDN - Indicate N.A. if not applicable) Ap SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall project, both develoned and undeveloped areas) . 1. Genera) character of the land: r~nerally uniform slope X Generally uneven and rolling or irregular 2. Present land use: Urban , Industrial . , Agriculture , Other acreage of project area: ~.~ acres. 3. Total Approximate acreage: Presently After Completion Meadow or Brushland acres acres Forested acres acres AQricultural acres acres 'letland (Freshwater or Tidal as net Articles ~4, 25 or ~.C.L.) ___acres acres 4. '4eat is ~-edomi.ant soil type(s) on nroiect site? , Co~eercial · Suburban ., Rural *'~., Forest Hater Surface Area Unvegetated (rock. earth or fill) Roads, buildinos and other paved surfaces Presently After Completion acres acres ~_acres acres Other (indicate tyne) acres acres [. ~.at is deat~ to bedrock? ..................... ('n ~eet) ( 6. Approxinate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10~ ~ ~; 1~-1~) %; 15~ or greater _ 7. Is project contiguous to, or contain a buildin~ or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places) Yes ...~_No B. What is the depth to the water table? feet g. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes X NO )0. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endanQereq - -Yes ~ ;iq, according to - Identify each species 11, Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations- Yes ~ No. (Describe 12. Is the project site presently used by the co:~nunity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - Yes ~ NO. 13. Does the present site offer or include scenic wews or vistas known to be important ~ the community? _ Yes ~ No 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: ~, a. Name of stream ~nd name of river to which it is tributary 15. Lakes, Ponds. ~etland areas within or contiguous to project area: i a. )(ame : b. Size {in acres) 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification withi~ a 1/4 mile radius of the project {e.g~ sinqle family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. ~ story). B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimension~.an~ scale of,project {~fill in dimensions as appKopriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor b. Project acreage developed: acres initia)ly~ . c. Project acreage to remain unoeveloped d. Length of project, in miles: . (if appropriate) acres ultimately. e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate oeroent of expansion ProPosed: age : developed acreage f. Number of off-strut parking spaces existino g. Haximum vehicular trios generated per hour h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: Initial One Family Two Family i proposea (upon completion of project) Multiple Family Condominium building square foot- Ultimate If: Cor~ne rcia) Orientation ;)eighborhood-City-Regional Estimated Employment Industrial j. Total height Qf tallest nro~osed Structure ...... feet. -2- 3. 4. 5. HOW much natural material ii.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site - How many acres of veqetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) ~ill be removed from site - __ Will any mature forest (over lO0 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by tn~s project? Yes ~ No Are thern any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? ~es __r~o 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipated No. b. Anticipated date of commencement phase ! month year (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date final phase month . year. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseouent phases? __Yes __No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes ~ No g. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 10. Nun~ber of jobs eliminated by this project ll. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? __Yes No. If yes, explain: tons cubic yards. acres. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. lg. Will project result in an increase in energy use? a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes No.' b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? Yes No. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? __Yes __No a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? __Yes No c. If yes, give name: : location d. Uil) any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes )~ No Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? __Yes ~ NO Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes ~ No Yes No. If yes, indicate type(s) __ 20. If water supply is from wells indicate pumping capacity 21. Total anticipated water usage per day pals/day. 22. Zoning: a. ~lhat is dominant zoning classification of site? b. Current soeci¢ic zoning classification of site d. gals/minute. If no, indicate desired zonlnq ~.~:~j~' 26. (. Is any Federal permit required? Yes ~ No Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? Local and Regional approvals: Yes _~No Approval Requi red {Yes, No) (Type} Submittal Approval (Date} (Date) City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Heal th Department Other local agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies Pederal Agencies INFO~J~ATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to m(tigate or avoid them. PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: REPRESENTING: DATE: -4- EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN~ - PART II Project Impacts and Their Magnitude General Inf~-~ation (Re~d Carefully) - In completing tn~ form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonaPle? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst, - Identifying that an effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily sionificant. Any large effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance, By identifying an ef)ect in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. - The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the threshol of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as guidance They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each ouestion. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. b. Answer Yes if there will be any effect. Maybe answers should be considered as Ye__s answers. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact, if impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact ~hen consider the impact as potentially large and proceeo to PART 3. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates, that such a reduction is not possible. NO YES IMPACT ON LAND WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE TO PROJECT SITE? Examples that Woulu Apply to Column 2 Any construotion on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise Per lO0 foot of length), er where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on Land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. ronstruction of oaved narkino arem Cmr 1,~ or more vehicles. C~nstruction on land where bedrock ~s exQosed or qeneral)y within J feet of existing ground surface, Construction tha~ will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one qKase nr stage. Excavation For m~n~ng purposes that would remove more than tons of natural material {i.e, rock or soil) per year. Construction of any new sanitary landfill. -5- SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT !MPACT PROJECT CHANGE ~OER,qTE LARGE REDUCED BY I~PACT IHPACT PQOJECT CHANGE ES rS S Other impacts: 2. ~ILL THERE 8E AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL [ANQ FOUND ON THE SITE? (i.e. cltff~, dunes, aeolo~ical forma- tions, etc.) ' ' __ Specific land roms: 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER BODY DESIGNATED AS ..... PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Envir- onmental Conservation Law, ~xa~les that ~ould A~ply to Co)~n 2 ~ Dredgtne ~re than lOO cubic yards of material f~ ~ Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 5. ~ILL PqOJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUNDI~ATE~ fllIALITY? ~xamole[ that !.)ould Apply tJ Colu~ ~ ~ Project will adversely affect groundwater. ~ Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to !~[LL PROJECT ALTER',DRAINAGE FL3', PATTEn!IS DR SIIRFRr. E UATER NJ) YES RUNOFF? ............ Examnle that 9ould ~nply to Colunn 2 -- Pro)eot would imnede flood water flews. Pro iect is likely to cause substantial erosion. Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. IlO YFS 7. ,'ILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY? ........................... /l~P"'~ Fxamoles that Hould Apply to Column g Project will induce 1,f)qO or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Project will result in the incineration of moro than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Project emission rate of al1 contaminants will exceed S lbs. ocr hour Or a heat source nroducing more than )O million BTU's per hour. -- Other l moacts: B. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR ENDANDERED SPECIES? Examples that Would Apoly tO Column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the l(ew York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Re~oval of any oortion of a critical or siqnificant wild- ADnlicati~n of Pesticide or herbicide over more than .'iO Y[S Examole that Would Apply to Column 2 or m~qratory fis~ or wildlife species. Project requires the re~val of ~ore than lq acres of St~ALL TO POTENTIAL CAtt I[IPACT BE P~)DE R~ATE LARGE REDUCED CY 1 -7- lO. UII.L TNE m~nJFCT ~PrECT VIrU¢ .... uiSTAs OR T!IE V~SPAL CHARACTER OF THE ~IFIGHBqRHAQD OR COM"UTIITV? .............. Examnles that k'ould~ply to Column 2 -- An ~ncnmoatible visual affect caused by the intro~uctinn ~ P~oject will result in the elimination or major Other impacts: IHPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCES Examoles that Would AODlv tO Column 2 Project occurino wholly or martially within or contiauous to any Cacilitv or site listed on the National Remi$~er of historic places. Any imoact to an archeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Other impacts: ~MPACT ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATION IZ. tiILL THE PRnjECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING NO YES OR FUTURE OPE~I SPACES OR RECREATIOIIAL OPPORTUt)ITIES? ...... ~/~ Examoles that ~lould Aoply to Column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational oooortunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the comunity. Other imoacts: SYSTEMS? SPALL Tt) ~eTENTIAL CA~I I;!PACT MODERATE LARGE REDUCED S ) ¥ 14. lB. 16. I~PACT ON ENERGY HILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO YES ENERGY SUPPLY? ........................................... Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project causing qreater than 5% increase in any form of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 sinqle or'two family residences. Other impacts: I, MPACT ON NOISE WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, NOISE, GLARE, VIBP~ATION NO YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? .... Examoles that t~ould Aooly to Column 2 GO Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Project will oroduce ooerating n~ise exceedino the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: ?PACT 0)! HEALTH & HAZARD} NFl YES !'JILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY? ............. Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will he a chronic 10w level discharge or emission. Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" {i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., includino wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases.) Storaoe facilities for one million or more gallmns of liouified natural gas or other liouids. Other impactS: S~ALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT DE )~DE~TE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT I~tPACT PROJECT CHANGE WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPACTER nF THE EXISTING NO COH~IUNIT¥? ............ .................................... Examole that Would Apoly to Column 2 The population of the City, Town or Village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5% of resident human ~opulation. The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera- ting services will increase by mere than S: per year as a result of this project. Will Involve any oermanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove nrime agricultural lands from cultivation. The Project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the cor~nunity. Development will induce an influx of a particular age g~up with special needs. Project will set an important precedent For future proiects. Project will relocate 15 or mere emnloyees tn one or mere businesses. Other imoacts: LARGE REDUCED BY It!PACT IItPACT PROJECT CHANGE 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? ....... Examoles that Would Apply to Colum~ 2 ~ NO YES Either government or citizens of adjacent con~nunities have expressed ooposition or rejected the project or have not been contacted. __ Obiections to the nroject from within the co~unity. IF ANY ACTIOIt Il: PART 2 IS IDENTIFIED AS A POTENTIAL LARGE IMPACT ON IF YOU CANNOT DETERMINE THE MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT. PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED FOR TH[S PROJECT: DETEPMINATION PART I ~ PART II ~ PART 3, Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1, 2 and 3) and considerinq both the maonitude and lmnortance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: ~) The project will result in no major impacts and, therefore. is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the ~itigation measures described in PART 3 have been included as part of the oroposed project. C. The project will result in one or ~ore major adverse impacts that Cannot be reduced and may cause significant damage to · g ~mJre of Prenarer (i'f dif~re-'~' from responsiole officer) PREPARE A NEnATIVE DECLARATION PREPARE A NEAATIVE DECLARATION PREPARE POSITIVE DECLARATION PROCEED WITH EIS Signature of R~spons~ble Official in Lead Agency ~'F~r~ or ty~e name or responsible officia) in Lead Agency ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS~ENT - PART III EVALUATI(~N OF TNE tMPrlRTANC£ ~lF IMPACTS I ~FOR~AT I ON Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially laroe. - The amount of writino necessary to answer Part 3 may be determined by answering the ouestion: In briefly completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of my decisions? I~STRUCTIO~(S Complete the followinq for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 of Part 2: l. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe {if apolicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than large imnact by a pro- Ject change. 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important to the mtniciDality (city, town or village) in which the project is located. To answer the question of importance, consider: - The probability of the impact or effect occurring The duration of the impact or effect Its irmeversibility, including permanently lost resources or values Whether the impact or effect can be controlled The regional consequence of the impact or effect Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the project apply to this impact or effect. DETErmINATION OF SIG~!IFICANCE An action is considered to be significant if: Ape (or more) imoact is determined to both larne and its (their) conseouence, based on the review above, is important. PAPT III STATEMENTS (Continue on Attachments, as needed) -ll- /,, 70 TAL //I x, d 'FL-AN GARREETT A. STRANG architect Main Road P.O. Box 1412 Southold NiY. 11971 516- 765 - 5455