The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-27.-2-3 , Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 August 29, 1984 Mr. Thomas Samuels Wunneweta Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Minor subdivision Thomas Samuels Dear Mr. Samuels: Please let this confirm the action of the Planning Board, ~ Monday, August 27, 1984. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny the application of Thomas Samuels to subdivide 3.75 acres into two parcels located at Narrow River Road, Orient since the buildable area of the lots is less than 80,000 square feet, therefore, lots of insufficient area would be created. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN ~OUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD '~O~~. By Diane M. Schultze,Q~~ry APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SECTION I. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT: Please canplete Section I of this fonn. Give the fonn to the agency Freedan of Infonnation Officer. The Freedan of Infonnation Officer will return one copy to you as a response to your request, or as an interim response. TO: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER AGENCY NAME: AGENCY ADDRESS: I HEREBY APPLY TO INSPECT THE FOLLOWING RECORD (Please describe the record sought. If possible, supply a date, a file title and number, and any other infonna- tion :hat will ~e~p loca~e the record ?eSired~ AIj/vtor St;Jo:I,.II$'-' 11- %O,pl- / .ernt4S 3~~eLs f1Jt e ~ R,:L. ",4: c, R,~ Signatur of App cant and Printed Name: , Applicant Represents: "";'IsPpF6 . . Applicant's Mailing Address:)I'IS.PEc" ~11 '1e>- SItN~ ~7/9T?9lIN'JI)1r Date of Application: > SECTION II. FOR USE AGENCY FREEDOM OF INFOR1lATION OFFICER ONLY [] Approved [ ] Denied: (for the reason(s) checked below) [] Confidential Disclosure [ ] Part of investigatory Files [] Unwarranted Invasion of Privacy . [] Record of Which This Agency is Legal Custodian Cannot be Found [] Record is Not Maintained by This Agency [ ] Exenpted by Statute Other Than the Freedan of Infonnation Act [ ] Other (specify):. . [] Receipt of this request is acknowledged. requested record until There will be a delay in supplying the for th~ following reason: Signature: Title: Date: Freedan of Infonnation Officer SECTION III. NOTICE TO APPLICANT YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO APPEAL A DENIAL OF THIS APPLICATION IN WRITING WITH- IN 30 DAYS OF THE DENIAL. INFORMATION AS TO THE PERSON TO CONTACT IS SHOWN BELOW. THE CONTACTED PEIlSON MUST RESPOND TO YOU IN WRITING WITHIN SEVEN BUSINESS DAYS OF RECEIPT OF YOUR APPEAL. Name: Southold Town Board Business Address: 53095 Main Road Telephone: Southold, New York 516-765-1800 ~ t.. :._'fX G 1984 JAMES H.RAMBO,I'l:!'. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y 11968 PHONE (516) 283-1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 7345858 December 4, 1984 Dear ~ ~ th~k you will find the enclosed valuable in applying objectivity to what is a very emotional subjective issue for most people. The points made will not mollify the concerned, but at least the origins of their concerns are made apparent. Knowledge is indeed power. Sincerely, Thomas E. Samuels TES:cq Ene. . dY~ ,~ uY--Q/) JEe '. 6 D84 We Scoff at Big Risks and Scotch Snlall Ones , By NEIL OXWFF In Zaire, the people of the Lele tribe most fear three risks-being struck by 'IIgbtnlng, contraCtIng broncbltls and bar- renness. Of courSe, these are not thl!''OnIy risks tacJng the tribe. The people are also susceptible to the usuaJ run of diseases common to the tropics, sueb as fever, gas- ~n~ritls,wberew~,rep~,w~n 'and pneumonIa. But they fear lightning, ,broncbltis and barrenness more. . In the U:8., one of ourgrealesl fean Is of pollutants. Sclenllflcevlden~ points to much gre~r risks of mortallty-from au. tomobile accidents, sniOklng, sunbl!.lhlng, motoreycllng, coal mining and mountain climbing, to list just a few. Yet con~rn over these risks Is smaJI compared wtth the concern over exposure to pollutants. , As most anthropologists wtll ~ll Us, the explanation for these apparentlnc~n' des Is'Simple. People do not focus on a p'artlcwar set of riskS Simply In order to safeguard health 8I1.d safety. The ebolce also reflects their view of moral and 1m. moral conduct. Dangen are exaggerated or minimized according to the soclalac- ~ptablJjty of the underlying activities, To be sure, there are real risks associ- ated wtth pollutants. Asbestos, benzene, lead, PCBs, formaldebyde and other wtdely used chemicals threaten the health of many Individuals. But the fear aroused by exposure to extremely low levels of pol- lutants In the environment far exceeds what available scientific evidence wtll jus. tify. What, then, does support the wtde. spreljd concern? Three grounds suggest themselves. First, the focus on pollutants provides a simple and plaUSible explanation for dreaded diseases such as cancer and birth defects. I! provides a ready answer-other than pure chance-for their occurrence. Moreover, this explanation exonerates the victims from responsibility for their per- sonalllfe-style decisions contributing to the outcome, such as the foods they eat, the amount of alcohol they drink, and the ex- -...J -- '---./ tent to which they smoke. The link to pollu- At present, sCIen~ can only cl]Idely es- tants frees Individuals from blame by re-' llmale the effects ofasubstal1ceOll Jabora- :n~:=t.=~ aln:~~:'r.~'tw.::.'mI::OlI~~: avoldable event.'. '. . ".. ."'~~' folliicUilthe envlroimie!lt These Second, the. focus' on the risks of Ponu~' . , . dofes. WbUe unrepresentative of teal world tants;~eJpS malnlaln people's Image of the '. condItlOhsi are necessary to }lI'IlCi\lCe mea- sanctity of nawre; Many individuals are .~lIlir&bleresuJts wtthJn a group of liOO to 1,- upset by,the recent discovery of. low levels 000, test. animals. The resWts are then ex- of thousands of toxic substances beCause trapola~ down to the levels acWaJly pres- it confIlcls wtth'thelr nollon of th~ purity of ent In the environment, and further extrap- the natural environment. I! destroys their .oIa~ from the particwar test animals Idealistic view of our air and wa~r. The employed In the experiment to humans. ubiquity of toxic substances demands eh . " These extrapolallons Involve dozens of dIf- ther a new, less benign con~pllon of na'. ferentassumptlons, to compensa,tefor the ture or an.,all-out attack against the "un-' , lack of specific data and for our Ignorance natu'ral" risks posed by these substances 'of the underlying mechanlsms causing dls' In the environment. eases'sueb as can~r. Tblrd, the focus on pollutants provides' . Tbls use,of.predlcllve models Introduces an outlet for a variety of anti-business atll- '. tremendous un~rtalntles Into the process tudes, partlcwarly our society's strong re- of risk assessment The National ACademy senlment of the power and pereelved Indlf- of ScIences recently estlma~ the ~umber ference of large corporations. In a number of cases of human bladder /;aIICer likelY to of blghly publicized cases, pollutants are resWt over the next 70 years from. contln, known to have caused substantial harm. In , ued, use of saccbarin. Using a,var.iety,of sever..! cases, the harm has been aggra- dlffe~t.,.,but plausible-sets of, lISS\1!Ilp- va~ by corporate misconduct, sueb as tions, It concluded that the number of concealment of known risks. By latcblng' cases of can~r comd range anywhere onto these cases and then generalizing to a from 0.22 to 1,144,000. mueb larger number of other Instances, Science can ~D us even less about the the public has devised a powerfW weapon effects of low-level eXposures to several wtth whleb to attack the general business substances. People are not exposed to a community. . Single substance at a time, but tJ a'num- Viewing the fear of pollutants as ber of different substances that, as wtth grounded In this complex set of social alcohol and certain drugs, may have syn- needs, rather than sImply In a concern for erglsllc effects. Scientific evidence on health, helps to explain some of ,the major these complicated effects is I!kely to be failures In resolving environmental contra- conclUSIve In the long run, but It may take venles. , well Into the next century before a solid The Environmental Protection Agency, understanding emerges on such Issues. the Occupational Safety and Health Admin- Even jf levels of risk were precisely Istration, and many companies have known, however, so that scientists wowd sought to latch onto scientific evidence to agree that a chemical dump presen~, defend their attempts in recent years to say. II one-ln-a-mIlllon risk of cancer to the ' rationalize the sys~m of societal controls. neighboring community, the current ap- Yet science cannot provide sufficient cer- proach to seeking public acceptan~e of risk talnty to dispel people's beliefs-and prob- wowd not work. The federal government's ably wtll not be able to do so for many risk-management policies are based on the decades. assumption that people wtll routinely toler- , '- a~ small risks and only demand protection from large ones. Yet, as we have seen, that Isn't necessarlly so. Nonetheress, regWatory agencies and companies have been asking people over the past few years to accept risks from pollutants simply because they are small. And they repea~y llave been rebUffed. 10 pubUc-meetJngs around the country, of- flcl;i)l; have been damned when they have tried to placate an angry crowd by noting that the addltlonal risk of cancer wowd be only "one In a mtI11on;". The.mistake here is clear: Officials have fatled to consider the emtural Jacton underIylng :people's . fear of pollutants. If the major concern of our society were to save the mQSt lives, we wowd ban smok- . lng. We 'aIso wou1d require smoke detec- tors In evefy home and place mobUe car- diae emergency units In every community. But where people have a complex set of soclaI needs, Inciudlngprotection of health and safety but not coextensive wtth It, this ai>i>r.iach inevitably wowd seem inade- quate. That may explain why government . agencies and' companies continue to strug- 'gle wtth the publlc's con~rn over trace levels of pollutants that may never harm even one penon in a million. Mr. Orloff directs the Center for Envi- ronmental Research at Cornell Univer- sity. ' ~ I ~ ~ U . ( j - OtL 4 19~~ eo, 6-0 x: 34.1 orient Movember 3D, 1984 To the editor The Suffolk li~es Green!,0 rt, ;-.. 0';,' Vorl: Daar Troy, 1 2ttimce,j the,'l~pti.ncr ()f the PI "nnin'J BOern en ')o'romh.?r 25. 3t which the Samu81'" application to subdividt.> the Narrow River Road propert:7 i~'1 ')ri':.:'O~rt -"{t-:'.~:; rejpr~i-:pd for ? .~(?cot',..:t tj'(IP. 1 .;..roulri Ijlr'e to commend the bo~rd for its strict interpretation of the ~own Code st~atutJ!:;;: rplc:t.lp'":: tn ]':.'n(J subje:::t t:Ci flooding. There i.s unfortunnt~ly no law which prevent8 propt.>rty which is for vurious reasons int.d"sie2.11V unhl1il(lc'blG frorn bcdn.:; ':>ut on the ":1?'r1<pt or purchosec for speculotionl the only w"v to protect potenti?l resident:=: from hi("1c1(~n ,:"]::' nrr'~r"', tr:. "t'ot.f?C't i:": fr: crilf"l I?l1vironmo.,..,t, as in the Samu~13 case, 3nd to 2vofd pressure being put on the ccmm,un.it.y t':) pr:'i.:c~ct it.splf l)y Innd purch:', se ~~ t C~p('cu12_~ tiol""_ prices is to enforce the code st.rictly, as the bOard is doinq. :>peculiltors .should be (liscour:" Cl,?c' from purc'psin:r such nrof>ertv in the bel ief that they can perpetrate dny outr~ge with it mnder the b2nner of ,"n individ\).?l'f' rir.:'1t t.o do _!h"t 'We uI11 with rie own nrop...rty. ~rert~ie ;\a~hshpr~nr . ~~ ~ d.0~ J)!!\ " ( J . Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 November 13, 1984 Mr. Thomas Samuels Hauwaters Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Minor subdivision Thomas Samuels Dear Mr. Samuels: We acknowledge receipt of your letter of October 15, 1984 regarding the above. Please be advised that we consider verbal or written communications of our Town Attorney to this Board regarding matters before us as priveleged communications and as such do not choose to provide you with them. Very truly yours, f;1. (J '" ...7-1/ -J, '~ ~ \..A'~ () ( {)J'v.:J'b /A.-^. \ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.CHAIRMAN / SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ~ FY:dms . ( t ' . NO\} 7 '984 JAMES H.RAMBo..IC. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON. N. Y 11968 PHONE '5l6' 283.1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE. N Y 11935 PHONE ;5]6~ 7345858 November 5, 1984 N.Y.S.D.E.C. SUNY - Bldg. #40 Stony Brook N. Y. 11794 ATTN: Marshall Irving Re. 10-84-0175 Thomas E. Samuels Dear Mr. Irving, You will recall testimony at the referenced hearing that cesspool run-off had created conditions making necessary the closing of Arshamomaque Pond (Mill Creek) Southold. Enclosed please find a report on the cause of these conditions and their remedies. You will please note that conduit runoff (Road) is the etiology of the high coli counts, as I so stated at the hearing. Please consider the enclosed document. Thomas E. Samuels TES:cq cc: Southold Town Planning Board g~~a~t~c~ofnt~c~a~lhA~~R~'BOb Forgionne cB'- J:h~ ,,~ (j\'- ~" ~ '~ , .- . ( , . . . 'NDV 7 1984' .-i ",'" RECEIVED TO: Honorable Henry Smith, President, Southold Town Trustees OCT 2? 198/ FROM: John Bredemeyer, Vice-president, Southold Town Trustees wn Clerk SoutholrtE: Arshamomaque Pond 'DATE: October 22, 1984 PURPOSE: Provide suggestions for immediate steps which may help lower coliform counts in the Long Creek drainage area. POSITION: I believe that absent any confirmed shellfish borne illness associated with consumption of shellfish from this pond,' the Town should vigorously pursue: 1. Immediate steps which along with cold weather and less rainfall, will result in a lowering of coliform counts leading to a conditional shell- fishing permit.. 2. Secure additional monitoring of the creek and its' tributaries and systematic application of solutions to permanently effect No. 1 above and eventually a full opening of the creek. (Although, I doubt if a full opening will, in rea14ty, be possible with the counts currently on record with the DEC.) I believe the following suggestions are generally consistent with the "208 Study" and may be implemented without any special permits (other than landowner consent) as no wetlands or endangered species are involved. However, other projects should be reviewed by the N.Y.S. DEC as there are some freshwater I ~ '; ( t ' r Page 2 of 4~ "- " - . indicator plants in the areas'woodland and drainage systems which could be affected. Even if these proposals do not significantly reduce coliform levels, they would be recommended purely on their improvement of safety, drainag~aesthetics and vector control in the areas without altering the environment. 1. CULVERT NEXT TO SHILOH BAPTIST CHURCH CORRECTION: Fill in large hole by culvert with coarse sand and gravel and provide rubble/splash blocks to prevent its regeneration. Fill stagnant pools in stream bed ~th sand. This culvert may not only store bacteria RATIONALE: from CR 48 drainage, but may actually grow them under certain circumstances. Filling with sand and splash blocks will tend to make stream of water spread out for ab- sorption and use by marsh ahead of the pond. Untreated, this waste water can easily con- taminate upwards of 1,000,000 gallons of water in Arshamomaque Pond with only a light rainfall. One can assume that l~ng residence ~ 'r times keeping such contamination in the creek for weeks. FUTURE : If additional in situ road drains are not possible for CR 48, and this drain continues with high counts, the area may be suitable for a march/trench system of purification as mentioned by "208 Study" and others. However, there are no guarantees that this would work. It would be best to eliminate the culvert entirely. < C t r r'2l6e .) 01 '+ 2. DRAIN PII:E AND DITCH BEHI~\1EST OF #600 and #670 GROVE DR. CORRECTION: Provide impervious drain pipe from corner of Mill Creek Dr. and Grove Dr. to North and rear of 11070 Grove Dr. North of this, the ditch should be generously cleaned and backfilled with clean sand and gravel. Impervious pipe will preclude possible infiltration of sanitary waste from #600 - #670 Grove Dr. Cleaning of drainage will remove in situ coliform breeding. Backfill with sand will eliminate stagnant water, permit drainage and some coliform filtering through sand and discourage mosquito breeding. RATIONALE: 3. DITCH AND STREAM \VEST OF MILL CREEK DRIVE WEST Similar cleanout as described above should be under- taken if bacterial tests warrant it. 4. LONG CREEK STREAM BED FROM CR48 SOUTH TO HEAD OF LONG CREEK. FUTURE: Good project for Scout troops earning merit badge. Clean stream bed and construct series of dams and ponds where biologicals cou~d be intro- duced. Beautiful man made pond exists there now behind someone~ house. RATIONALE: Reduce flow from storm runoff and provide additional oxygen rich habitats which would trap and destroy coliforms. 5. POND NORTH SIDE OF LONG CREEK DRIVE. Did not review this pond for lack of exact location. Employ same guiding principles as above - possibly a sand drain or natural filter could be constructed for the pond. -, C{ r Page 4 of 4 6. SUGGESTIONS FOR RESIDENTS IN THE AREA: 1. Minimize outside feeding of pets/wildlife within 200' of pond or any of its tributaries. 2. Minimize use of fertilizers, especailly manure fertilizers in the entire area. 3. Do not dump any waste, leaves, grass clippings, fish guts, animal offal or any thing, for that matter, into the pond or its tributaries. In closing, a quote from the recently released booklet, "Marine Resource Management Needs" by the N.Y.S.D;E.C. seems appropriate, "Historically, greater scrutiny of the sanitary quality of growing waters has led only to more closures." What I believe this means for Southold Town, is that more closures are likely due to storm water discharges. We should strongly en- courage our Town, County, State and Federal officials who control the purse strin~,to provide help for storm water treatment or acceptable shellfish depuration facilities. Southold is not alone in this problem,and we should not hesitate to speak out and be heard. t";;.' ~~~~J-'/?2Z- John Bredemeyer, III Vice-president Southold Town Trustees JB:bb cc: N.Y.S. Assemblyman Joseph Sawicki Southold Town Supervisor Francis Murphy N.Y.S.D.E.C. Bureau of Shellfisheries, James Redman Biologist, Paul Flagg Southold Town Bayman's Association Town Board James McMahon Trustees File }'-~},~"'III!""~>'.;-; "'~;7r~:'7'--t~-\"-'-""f;~_7f)j<"'!<;~,:::."7':""",~-?-:';}.)-:--,,:::~r:~:-::";o:;:~-O""?:<ll':~;---:-- -c"r;~~~-,,",-~::;;';~~{~~:'::-<l; ;,Ii:_T,~f~_,__ --,<-~~- ({ ~ -<0e-rn-6lZs. AT Ovs.7Ue- g"'D 100 -\4e. (A) \00 - 14'::> "SlbP O=""gs A loCo - t:'-t..o (e:;) ~a.T ..Wfu ., vJ~ peif 7Tlt.r' &IF<7~r PfCii-J-TS oP SJWIVIS/CVV,s? ? I ~ \ ~ 'TJ-l..l$ lffNlb/X-I"-IG, AGtI>NGy'. WHt%?<<';s;. IT SHavA/ IN 77-Iv C00<5 ~ / I' ~ .' . I 23iEnitock & 1"ucchEii I qJ, C. .. NOV 5 , 1984 CONSULTING ENGINEERS . CIVIL.a STRUC11J1lAL ENGINEERINO . PLAlNVIEW, NEW YORK . STORM DRAINAOE A PLOOD CONTROL .. PAR$IPPANY. TROY HILLS. N.J. . SANITARY" WATER FACILITIES . WALLlNOFORD,CONNECTlaIT . CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT . PLANS.t SPECIFlCAnONS . REPORTS" STUDlES 350-03 october 31, 1984 Mr. A. Marshall Irving Administrative Law Judge New York state Department of Environmental conservation SUNY, Building 40 stony Brook, NY 11794 Re: Application of Thomas Samuels No. 10-84-0175 Dear Mr. Irving: At the October 25, 1984 hearing for the above referenced application, testimony was presented regarding the occurrence of viruses in cesspool effluent and their effect on ground and surface water quality. I have investigated this matter by speaking to the agency which is funding the subject virus study as well as to the principal investigator of that study. Below you will find some background information and conclusions which I have drawn, and I request that you consider this material in the manner of Dr. Samuels' application. The virus study referred to in the testimony is presumably the study being conducted by Dr. James vaughn of Brookhaven National Laboratory, under contract to the suffolk county Department of Health services. The purpose of this study is to generate viral. information on which to base water supply well location criteria; current criteria are based on bacterial data. The study is not designed to assess impact on surface water quality. Based on data from this and other viral studies, it appears viruses can travel hundreds or perhaps even thousands of hor i zontally wi th groundwater depending on soil conditions. impact of this on surface water quality is conjecture at time, and must be considered in light of the following: that feet The this 1. surface runoff is very likely a major source of viruses in surface waters. 2. Bathers are very likely a major source of viruses in surface waters. 3. Boat toilets are very likely a major source of viruses in surface waters. 4 . sewage treatment plant outfalls are very likely a major source of viruses in surface waters. ~~\ (J'J ~'" ~ ONE FAIRCHILD COURT. PLAINVIEW. NEW YORK 11803 . (516)349.0076 ,. ,..-. c . BIENSTOCK & LUCCHESI, P.C. October 31, 1984 page 2 5. cesspool leachate may be a minor source of viruses in surface waters. 6. All current deci sions must be based on current regulations. current DEC regulations do not prohibit installation of cesspools further than 100 feet from surface water. Therefore, the subject application cannot be denied on the basis of current regulations, nor can the subject application be denied on the basis of the possibility of future regulation changes. 7. We have no way now of predicting the results of future studies of virus pollution of surface waters by cesspool systems if such studies are performed, nor can we predict the regulations which would be promulgated therefrom. If the current scant knowledge on the subject were applied now, across the board to all proposed on-site sewage disposal systems, what "safe distance" from the system to surface waters would be required? 100 feet? 200 feet? 1,000 feet? 1/4 mile? No one knows. The application of such a restriction in the absence of hard da ta and wi thout consideration of other more major sources of viruses, would be improper. The economic and political effects of such a restriction would be disastrous. We wish to point out that the design of the sewage disposal systems and water supply wells for the subject property must conform to all suffolk county Department of Health services regulations in force at the time of application, and further that the water supply wells can be located up gradient of, or laterally across from the sewage disposal systems, thus protecting the wells from any effect of the on-site disposal systems. B""",a on the systems, it subdivision of current regulations regarding sewage appears that there is no reason to the subject property. disposal prohibit very truly yours, BIENSTOCK & LUCCHESI, P.C. FORGIO~ ROBERT C. RCF/cb I , ,. 5 1984 ORIENT ASSOCIATION Box 44. RD# 1 Orient (Long Island), N.Y. 11957 November 2, 1984 Southold Town Planning Board Southold New York 11971 Re. Thomas Samuels application for subdivision, Narrow River Road, Orient Dear Members of the Town Planning Board. The Orient Association has taken a position in opposition to the application of Thomas Samuels, and we are enclosing letters that were entered as testimony at the DEe Hearing on October 25th with Justice A. Marshall Irving presiding. We would like copies of these letters included in your files. i cer.e3.J ~ e 1 ((Newman orresponding Secretary Enclosures (J) Letters from, Orient Association, Dorothy M. Berks Patrick E. Lyons Fredrica L. Wachsberger . .CV 5' 1984 MTIlICK L LlONS 203 EAST 29th STREET NEW YORK. NY 10016 MAIN ROAD ORIENT. NY 11957 October 15, 1984 A. Marshall Irving, Administrative Law Judge New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Office of Hearings, Room 213 Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 Re: Application number 10-84-0175 As a resident of the hamlet of Orient, New York who may not be able to personally attend the hearing on October 25 for the above application, I wish to have my comments and testimony presented and made a part of the record of the hearing. I object to permission being given to the applicant to create a subdivision and to construct a rip-rap retaining wall. I further object to the DEC allowing any construction on the banks of Hallock's Bay and Narrow River for the following reasons: (1) The parcel in question is located in a flood-plain area which historic evidence has shown would be subjected to a tidal wash-over in a severe storm. (2) The possibility of further contamination and pollution of Hallock's Bay is real and immediate if permission for this type of construction is approved. We have recently witnessed the closing of Mattituck Creek and other waters in Southold Town to shellfish harvesting as a result of pollution. The threat to an area as important as Hallock's Bay is too overwhelming to allow any further danger from residential pollution. (3) The proposed sub-division and the resultant construction would create an aesthetic blight on the almost pristine shoreline of Narrow River and Hallock's Bay. The Bay is bordered on the north by Long Beach, which is a NY State park and preserve and will remain in an undeveloped state forever; on the east, Gid's Island is being considered for purchase and protection as another nature preserve; the various tidal wetlands acts will protect the marshlands to the immediate east of the site and to the west of the site, the Town of Southold owns land used as a public access area and community groups are even now studying alternatives which will have as their end, the inclusion of Narrow River and Hallock's Bay into a permanent natural preserve. Shore-line, residential development is therefore incongruous and incompatible with the current and future uses of Hallock's Bay. (4) Property adjacent to the above site has recently been subdivided into 5 acre parcels and that land, although sharing many of the ecological problems as the site, if developed will pose a smaller threat to Hallock's Bay. (5) The proximity of a public access, on the immediate east of the site, will surely result in social disputes and disruption if sub-division approval is given. The public has an inviolate and constitutional right to the beaches and this will surely lead to a conflict with the owners of the developed parcel, who will have a considerable financial stake in the site as a private residence. The community of Orient has traditionally made heavy use of this access to Hallock's Bay and high-priced, exclusionary development will surely have a chilling affect on the continued enjoyment by the community as a whole. . . Page 2. The development of this site is clearly detrimental to the community as a whole and to the natural environment and should not be approved. It is the right of an individual to use his property as he likes, but that right has always stopped well short of letting that individual jepordize the rights of society as a whole. This is the case we have before us today. Mr. Samuels right to financial gain should not be placed before the rights of the community as a whole to enjoy continued and fruitful use of Hallock's Bay. Sincerely yours, Patrick E. Lyons Applicant: Thomas E. Samuels c/o J.H. Rambo Inc., Bishops Lane, Southampton, NY 11968 Application number: 10-84-0175 ., _OV 5 ORIENT ASSOCIATION 1984 Box 44, RD# 1 Orient (Long Island), N.Y. 11957 October 25, 1984 Justice A. Marshall Irving, Administrative Law Judge New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation Office of Hearings, Room 213 Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, N. Y. 11794 RE' Appli~ation 10-84-0175 . Dear Justice Irving, This testimony has been prepared with the cooperation and approval of the Board of Directors of the Orient Association upon recommendation of the Association membership. In the absence of the Association's presiding officers, it is respectfully submitted by yours truly acting in their behalf. The position of the Orient Association in opposition to both parts of Mr. Samuels' application has been stated in part in four letters which accompanied our request for party status. We request that those letters be counted in today's hearing, together with all letters from other associations and private petitioners who plead that no development be allowed to destroy the integrity of Hallock Bay. The Master Plan for Southold Town, which is nearing completion, will, with good reason, recommend that land in Orient located south of the Main Road be up zoned to five acres. Today's hearing concerns an application to place two homes on a mere 3.75 acres of some of the most fragile of that land. Locally known as the ::Potato Dock", this part of the RG.llock F:~.rm is the relic of a sizable shipping operation which was obliterated by the Hurricane of 1938. On August 29, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency in this application, denied Mr. Samuels' application because more than 3/8 of the property,(i. e., 31,000 of 80,000 square feet,) are subject to flooding and therefore not eligible in establishing lot size. The Planning Board also expressed the opinion that this is a poor area for such a proposal. Directly across Narrow River Road from the Samuels property, the southernmost building lots of the Settlers at Oysterponds development are divided into long, rectangular parcels of roughly ten, eleven and twelve acres. . . . 2 . Because of problems of flooding and drainage inherent in this area, the building envelopes for these three lots are designated as far back as possible from Narrow River Road, the Samuels property, and the desirable water view. The remaining seven lots of the subdivision contain a minimum of five acres. We suggest that the Planning Board's standards for this development be required for all other development in Orient until the Master Plan is officially i~place. A good mtasure of the Orient Association's opposition to this application centers on the short environmental assessment form submitted by Mr. Samuels, who answered all questions in the negative. We respectfully submit our respone to the same form: 1. Will the project result in a large physical change to the project site or physically alter more than 10 acres of land? NO. Does not apply. 2. Will there be a major change to any unique or unusual land form found on the site? YES. The portion of the property which is now wetland with wetland flora might be changed by residential use, such as docks or piers. 3. Will project alter o~ have a large effect on existing body of water? UNKNOWN. There is the strong possibility that septic waste will create problems for the public swimming area to the south of the property and for shellfish in the immediate waters. The problem of septic waste will be of particular concern because of runoff after heavy rains. 4. Will the project have a potentially large impact on groundwater quality? UNKXOWN. 5. Will project significantly effect drainage flow on adjacent sites? UNKNOWN. Lower parts of Narrow River Road already flood at times of heavy rains. Nothing is known of the applicant's plans for grading or containing drainage to his own boundaries. 6. Will project affect any threatened endangered plant or animal species? NO. 7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on air quality? NO. Does not apply. 8. Will project have a major effect on visual character of the community or scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? YES, EMPHATICALLY. The very heart of what is perceived to be Orient lies in the hamlet of Orient, which has landmark designation and in the Narrow River Road-Hallock Bay area which we hope is on the way to becoming a nature preserve. At all seasons, this area offers an unbroken vista of the ," . ~ . 3. type of environment that is being systematically nibbled away by development. Given the low quality of the applicant's land, the landfill and berming required to create a buildable site would cause an abrupt intrusion in an area of flat, open space and long views in uncharacteristic and undesirable '.ay. 9. Will project adversely impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance or any site designated as a critical environmental area by a local agency? UNKNOWN. The outcome of this application will have a major effect 6n deterzining the environmental importance of the Hallock Bay area. 10. Will project have a major effect on exiating or future recreational opportunjties? UNKNOWN. Historically, the existence of a residence adjacent to a public area creates problems. 11. Will project result in major traffic problems or cause a major effect to existing transportation systems? NO. Does not apply. 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturbance as a result of the project's operation? NO. Does not apply. 13. Will project have any impact on public health or safety? UNKNOWN. We refer again to potential problems regarding the adjacent public bathing area and the shellfish in the immediate area. 14. Will project affect the existing community by directly causing a growth of more than 5 percent over a one year period or have a major negative effect on the character of the community? YES to the second part. We refer again to the Master Plan's recommendation for five acre zoning in this area, as well as to the letters sent to the DEC and other agencies,expressing local sentiment about what this property represents to the community. 15. Is there public controversy concerning the project? YES, EMPHATICALLY. As Mr. Samuels knew at the time he checked NO, his application is opposed by the Orient Associa~ion, the North Fork Environmental Council, the Baymen's Association, and by private petitioners. Altogether, this represents approximately one thousand residents of Southold Town in general and of Orient in particular who have joined together in opposition to the senseless loss of a cherished environment. ~ . ~, . 4 . Our tally of Mr. Samuels' environmental impact form counts fivp. NOs, four of which do not apply, four YESses, and six UNKNOWNs. Of the questions that we have answered as unknown, we sincerely hope that you will make your decision on the side of caution. Much is said about the right of an individual to develop land for financial gain, and the Orient Association wishes to make it clear that it supports this right, but only insofar as it does not encroach upon the rights and income of others. This includes the rights of a future buyer who may find at a future date that building on such a site is inadvisable. As our Planning Board statesJ it is, indeed, I'a poor area to sQueeze in-two lots." >> Respectfully submitted, ~~ On behalf of the ORIENT ASSOCIATION f . . . ". NOli 5 '981 orient September 30, 1984 A. Marshall Irving Administrative Law Judge New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Office of Hearings Room 213, Building 40 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 Re: #10-84-0175: Narrow River Road, Orient Dear Justice Irving, I am writing as a property owner and resident of Orient, New York, and as a member of the Orient Association and its committee for ...... . the preserveat~on of Hallock's Bay. I request party status at the hearing for myself or other representatives of the committee or the association. I am enclosing photographs which I would like to have entered as evidence in the proceedings. The property in question, on Narrow River Road, has been denied a subdivision by the Town Planning Board of Southold on the grounds of insufficient acreage. We strongly urge that permission to build a revetment be denied as well, and indeed that no building be allowed on this property, for the fOllowing reasons: 1. Hallock's Bay is very fragile and is of vital importance to the ecology of the east end and to its shellfishing industry. The Closing of Mattituck and Mill Creeks to shellfishing by the DEC illustrates how close and imminent is the danger of bacterial POllution of Ha1lock's Bay due to stccm runoff and residential septic systems. 2. This property is ~,rticularly sensitive for two reasons: it is immediately adjacent to public access for swimming and shellfishing, and it is of very low elevation, considerably lower than Narrow River Road and nowhere, except immediately at the existing portions of the dike, more than five feet above mean high water. It is entirely flooded in heavy rains, as has occurred many times during this summer. This, and the shallow septic system, would cause immediate danger of pOllution of the public swimming and shellfishing area, as well as the larger bay. Permission to build here should be denied under Section A 106-36C of the Wetlands Ordinance. It should be pointed out that the "Settlers" property directly across Narrow River Road from the Samuels property is there divided i~ 10, 11 and 12 acre lots because of the flooding and drainage problem~,.a~ the building envelopes are at the opposite ends of the lots. \ 3. A minimum of five-acre zoningpas been recommended for this c rea of Orient under the Master PIon, to preserve the W2 ter toble. 4. The rip-rup revetment would be entirely out of scc:;le and ,; gross imposition aesthetic"IIY ;'nd ecologic"lly. Ple.,se note th"t the line of it has not been included on Nr. Samuel's survey; I am submitting photogrophs which show the position of the markers for it. The Town Trustees, who were not certain of its exact position, recommended approval of it~s construction only to the height of the existing elevation Of the land; . . . ~ it C3n be seen from photographs that in many places the land is little above high water mark. Existing masonry walls are less than five feet in height. An earthen dike would be more appropriate aestheticallY and ecologically. 5. Development of this property would not be consistent with the expressed intention of the state and the~own to preserve Hallock's Bay, and tee purchase thereby of neighboring property. Additional property in the vicinity is protected by the Nature Conservancy. The Samuels property is a small but crucial lynchpin in this preservation effort, because of its direct proximity to public bathing and shell fishing and beeause, 'I<lr1w"""'C~ except for the marin, buildings, themselves apparently of questionable leg3lity, there are no other residences on this stretch of frontage of the bay, nor threatening the creek. Sincerely, Fredrica L. Wachsberger .' ~c 0 p y J)lI " . t,.1. j'(:\~!l IJ<':4 cc. _TY OF SUFFOLK PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES OAV'D HA""'" M.D.. M.P.H. cooo___u October 29, 1984 Mr. Thomas E. Samuels Haywater Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Re: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Samuels, (T) Southold (SCTH 1000-027-2-3) Dear Mr. Samuels: Your request to appear before the Board of Review of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has been received. The review of this case has been scheduled for November 9, 1984 at 11:00 a.m. in the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Conference Room, 2nd floor, North Wing, County Center, Riverhead. You and interested parties are requested to appear, with or without counsel, and you may produce any information or evidence concerning the above referenced property. Very truly yours, Robert A. Villa, P.E. Chairman Board of Review RAV:cah CC: Mr. Joseph H. Baier, P.E. Mr. Harold Scott Mr. Royal R. Reynolds, P.E. Mr. Charles G. Lind ~ Town of Southold Planning Board ~ D ~~\~\\f\ COUNTY CENTER RIVERt-lE..l.D. N. Y. 1 I gO 1 (516) 548-3317 ~l(J <Y (] cJ;f f ~ \Y ),rf ff~~~rf ~t\\\o\~ . , SEP 6 1984 JlMESH.IWJBO.IIC. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y 11968 PHONE: (516) 283.1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y 11935 PHONE: (516) 734.5858 Sept 4-, 1984- Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Att: Frank Cichanowicz Re: Narrow River Rd. Dear Mr. Cichanowicz: As per your request, let me state the following. r intend to plant low marsh (spartina alternaflora) on one meter centers seaward of the propsed rip rap revetment in order to re-establish the low marsh destroyed in the Hallock Road project some years ago. r trust the permits .for this project will be forthcoming. Enclosed please find a photo of a 2.1 acre marsh planted four years ago in Southampton on one meter centers. /~, cc: N.Y.S.D.E.C. Southold Town Board " "Planning Board " "Trustees The Orient Association . & Southold, N. Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 17, 1984 Mr. Robert W. Takser Town Attorney 425 Main Street Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Thomas Samuels at Orient Dear Mr. Tasker: Enclosed is a copy of a letter received from Thomas Samuels by certified mail, and a copy of the Planning Board's resolution denying his application. Also enclosed is your letter of February 4, 1983 to the Planning Board regarding Section l06-36C of the ordinance. May we remind you that we are still awaiting a response to our previous requests for your legal opinion on Section l06-36C as it pertains to computations for two-acre building lots. Thank you for your attention in this matter. '-:J' Very truly yours, ~ffi-CtL OrLDwYu:., ~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. . > #i~j, ~ \ . . OCT 1 A '98~ _ElH.._.1C. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y 11968 PHONE: (516) 283-1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 7345858 October 15, 1984 The Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Att: Mr. Bennett Orlowski Re: Thomas E. Samuels Narrow River Rd. Orient, N.Y. Minor Subdivision Dear Mr. Orlowski: I have been asked by my attorney, Mr. Stephen Angel of Esseks, Cuddy, Hefter & Angel to acquire the following information. Please forward a copy of the Town Attorney's determination of the legality of the Board's application of the Zoning Code in the denial of my project. I respectfully request this information as soon as possible. Thank you for your consideration. (' \ SirelY, / ~. Thomas E. Samuels Certified Mail P 382 508 640 Return Receipt " ~ OCT ~ 1984 . 4390 Orchard Street Orient, New York 11957 October 5, 1984 Mr. A. Marshall Irving Administrative Law Judge New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Office of Hearings Room 213, Building 40 SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. Irving: SUBJECT: APPLICATION OF THOMAS SAMUELS - NO. 10-84-0175 I want to participate in the October 25, 1984 public hearing for this application to voice my opposition to the project due to the reasons outlined below. There is more at issue here than a simple subdivision and wetlands permit. The real issue is: What is to be the future of Hallock's Bay? Permitting this sub- division by the NYSDEC when the application has already been rejected by the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services would set a dangerous precedent for continued.development around Hallock's Bay. Granting approval would also be inconsistent with the knowledge that the DEC has already ordered the closing of Mattituck and Mill Creeks in Southold due to elevated coliform bacteria counts. Allowing excessive development bordering Hallock's Bay is certain to ensure a similar fate for the Hallock's estuary. Ar. application to the DEC to develop the nearby property of Dr. Frances Perrone, also on Hallock's Bay, was recently withdrawn as the state has indicated its in- tention to preserve the estuary by purchasing the property. It seems inconsistent that the state would allow subdivision of one property, thereby increasing the threat of pollution of the bay, while purchasing a neighboring parcel to preserve it. It is not necessary for the state to expend additional funds to buy the Samuels' property, but it can help preserve the bay by limiting development on its shores. The Town of Southold has recognized the need to protect Hallock's Bay from sewage contamination and stormwater runoff by calling for a minimum of five-acre zoning around its shores in the draft master plan update. The subdivision "Settlers at Oysterponds" on Narrow River Road was required to have five-acre minimum lot size to prevent sewage and stormwater runoff of the development from contaminating Hallock's Bay. , ~ "",,^ ~ 11 .' . . ,.. I.. . Mr. A. Marshall Irving Page 2 October 5, 1984 Covenants to prevent any future division of the lots in this subdivision were required by the Southold Town Planning Board to protect the bay. In fact, the four parcels bordering on Narrow River Road, immediately adjacent to the Samuels' property, average nearly ten acres each. Test well data from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services indicate that groundwater is encountered less than three feet from the land surface. The effluent of any sewage disposal system placed on the property would quickly leach to the shallow water table. Groundwater flow is directly into the bay and would deposit contaminants from the sewage disposal system into Hallock's Bay. Tides from the storm of March 29 flooded the property and would have caused any sewage system to overflow and drain into the bay, providing additional evidence of the damage that could be caused by this development. The residents of Southold Town have been able to enjoy swimming and shellfishing in Hallock's Bay. We have seen the results of unwise development in shoreline areas with the closing of Mattituck and Mill Creeks. The environmental consequences of this project would be a degradation of the water quality in the bay. Excessive shoreline development will certainly result in the closing of Hallock's Bay to shellfishing. The loss to recreational and commercial shell fishers would be tragic. Additional negative social implications of the project will be manifested in the loss of scenic beauty of the area with views of the water that would be obliterated by the construction of houses and berms. All tl"d" t,"rm can be prevented by proper planning now. It is incumbent upon the DEC t= ~_Ject this application to protect the public interest and preserve an environmental asset for future generations. Very truly yours, 4(;; ~.~7~,'. ;/ Martin Trent MT/lst cc Hon. Joseph Sawicki, Jr. Town of Southold Planning Board The Suffolk Times . (.j '-- state of New York ~ I .8fp Z';l;_ .. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE APPLICANT: Thomas E. Samuels c/o J .H. Rambo Inc. Bishops Lane, SouthamPton, NY 11968 APPLICATION NUMBER: 10-84~175 \l PROJECT DESCRIPrrON AND LOCATION: Create two-lot residential subdivision by dividing a 3.75 acre parcel into 2 lots of 83,300 Sq. ft. and 80,000 sCil.. Zt. and install 340 ft. of concrete rip-rap wall landward of mean high water. Located on west side of Hallock's Bay on the east side of Narrow River in Ot'ient, Town of Southold, Suffolk County. PERMITS APPLIED FOR: Tidal Wetlands SEQR: The staff of the Department of Environmental Conservation, as lead agency, determined that the magnitude of the environmental impact of the pro- posed project does not warrant the preparation of a ~aft Environmental Impact statement, and issued its determination on June 15, 1984, pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 617. PUBLIC HEARING: held on October Road, Southold; An adjudicatory public hearing on the 25, 1984 at 10:30 A.M. in the Southold NY 11971. application will be Town Hall, 53095 Main STATUTORY AND REGULATORY PROVISIONS: The processing of this application is pur- suant to Environmental Conservation Law (f1ECLfI) Article 3, Title 3 (General Functions, Article 70 (Uniform Procedures; and Article 25 (Tidal Wetlands); and pursuant to the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the state of New York ("6NYCRR"), Part 621 (Uniform Procedures) and Part 661 (Tidal Wetlands-Land Use Regulations); and Part 624 (Permit Hearing Procedures). FILING FOR PARTY STATUS: Party status to participate at the adjudicatory public hearing held by this Department will be accorded only to those persons who can provide a clear demonstration of social, economic, or environmental interests which are likely to be affected by the proposed project. All persons, groups, corporations or agencies desiring party status at the hearing must file a specific statement in writing containing precise grounds for opposition, support, or inter- est for the ]Jr'oject, including the nature of the argument and evidence which the person intends to ]Jr'esent at the hearing and any other matter believed relevant. ALL FILINGS REQUESTING PARTY STATUS TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING MUST BE RECEIVED AT THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS !fr '.THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS NO LATER THAN THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON October 19, 1984: A. Marshall Jrving, Administrative Law Judge, New York state Department of Environmental Conservation, Office of Hearings, Room 213, Building 40, SUNY, stony Brook, Net~ York 11794: Telephone (516) 751-7900, EXtension 258. c~\ C'01 [it...\ ovw . . Page 2 . . OOCUMENT AVAJLABJLITY: The application can be reviewed and copies of reproduc- ible portions obtained for 25-cents per page at the above address. ^", All Parties having an interest in this Project are urged to attend or be rep- resented either individually or collectively at the hearing and to submit pertinent testimony and exhibits to insure consideration of all positions and issues. The Department's Decision will. be based solely on the hearing record. The hearing may be cancelled if the filed objections are withdrawn or resolved. A. ,,'Marshall Irving Administrative Law Judge stony Bt'ook, New York DATE: _~eptember 24, ~984 - ~^ ,."/ ~ c) ~. , t tl' n . s ~ T D Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 September 25, 1984 Mr. Ed Hindermann Building Inspector Town of Southold Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application of Thomas Samuels located at Orient Dear Mr. Hindermann: With regard to your inquiry on the area of the buildable property within the above mentioned subdivision, we offer the following information. Area below the dike (area subject to flooding,g 106-36C) is 31,000 square feet i. Therefore, that deleted from the total square footage of Lot 1 leaves 52,300 square feeti which does not meet the subdivision regulations for the present zoning. If you have any questions regarding this, please don't hesitate to contact our office. ery truly yours, es Bry~~anner thold Town Planning Board JB:dms ~ \"y; . Page 4 . 8/27/84 Samuels located at Orient- This proposed minor subdivision is for ( 2 lots on 3.75 acres. The Chairman reviewed pictures of the area which were submitted to the Planning Board office. It was also noted that the Board has received the amended surveys of the lots and James Bryer, Town Planner, has reviewed them, With the deletion of the meadow lands, there is not enough buildable area for the current two acre zoning. Mr. Samuels was present for this discussion and approached the Board, he explained that meadow land is above the mean high water mark, therefore, he feels that it can't be marsh. He stated that he had requested Mr.Van Tuyl to indicate t he mean highwater mark because that is the limits of the property. _ Mr. Samuels questioned the time it took for the Board's action and the Chairman noted that much of the time was spent discussion the various other possiblities for the land with the applicant. Mr. Samuels requested that the Board take action on the application and also indicated that he felt Mr. Latham should refrain from voting due to the nature of his business in relation to Mr. Samuel's business. Mr. Latham stated that he did not have an interest in the business any longer as it was being run by his son and Mr. Samuels withdrew his request. On a motion made by Mr. WArd, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board deny the application of Thomas Samuels to subdivide 3.75 acres into two parcels located at Narrow River Road, Orient since the buildable area of the lots is less than 80,000 square feet, therefore, lots of insufficient area would be created. ( Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward Mr. Latham asked that it be noted that he did vote in the motion. Mr. Terrial representinq the Southold Town Bayman's Association was present with .,.several objections other than the one expressed by the Board in thier denial. The Chairman stated that the Board would stand onthe original reason for denial since they cannot approve any lots under 2-acres., and all the other information was reviewed and taken into consideration. The Chairman suggested that any additional objections be sent to the Department of Environmental conservation for thier public hearing. Mr. Mullen requested that the following letter from the Planninq Board file be read into the minutes: Mr. Samuels letter of May 8, 1984, " allow me to thank you for your courteous attention to the \referenced application of last evening" I think we have proceedEl. in a timely and orderly manner since the original application was made November 1983, said Mr. Mullen. * * * On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED th~the Southold Town Planning Board qrant an extensioR to Marqery Dickinson Burns for filing final maps of the subdivision of Margery D. Burns, located at Southold, for a period not to exceed 90 days from the date of this resolution. E Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward. AUG 24 1984 t · ORIENT ASSOCIATION . Box 44, RD# 1 Orient (Long Island), N.Y. 11957 August 23, 1984 Southold Town planning Board Southold, New York, 11971 Dear Sirs, The orient Association wisheS to reiterate its concern about the potential effects of development of the Samuels property on Narrow River Road, Orient, (Tidal Wetlands Permit No.10-84- 0175). In addition to the reservations expressed in our letters to the DEC of June 9 and July 11, we feel it necessary to question the new survey as to the accuracy of the mean high water mark in relation to the existing masonry walls, and to the extent to which wetlands and meadow have been included in the property measurements. We would also like to call attention to the elevations on the new survey, which reveal that excepti for the area immediately around the existing dike, the property has for the most part an elevation of only five feet. It is entirely flooded in heavy rains, as has occurred many times this summer. According to Section A 106-36C of the Wetlands Ordinance, lands subject to flooding should not be platted for residential use, and there is ample precedent for refusing the right to build on such lands. It should be pointed out that the "Settlers" property is subdivided into 10, 11, and 12 acre lots directly across Narrow River Road from the Samuels property because of the quality of soil and water drainage at that end, and the building envelopes there are at the opposite ends of the lots. The Association is particularly concerned because the Samuels property is directly adjacent to a 50-foot public right of way for swimming and shellfishing, and any sanitary system placed on this property, given its elevation, would create a severe health hazard and endanger the bay through the ftreat of seepage and drainage. It would not be consistent with the expressed intention on the part of the s,tate and the town to preserve Hallock's Bay, and intention evidenced by the purchase of nearby property and by the projected five-acre minimum zoning in this area, to permit a direct hazard of this sort. The DEC has in its file letters representing approximately 1000 persons, inCluding the Baymen's Association, the North Fork Environmental Council, the Orient Association, and private petitioners, pleading that this area remain undeveloped to protect the integrity of the bay. It is also important to voice other community fears: that owners of any potential homes on this property would want to install docks and dredge the bay, further endangering it and imposing on the public right to safe bathing and shellfishing, and that due to the high flood plain, any construction would have to be raised on stilts, destroying the aesthetic integrity of the area. k~l.~~ Sin~lY, /f} //;:;< r,1 c..-.- L~ Y/1__)2 t/-.x.... , . Fred Letson, Pres1dent cc: Southold Town Trustees The Orient Association Southold Conservation Advisory Council AUG 24 1984 . . ORIENT ASSOCIATION Box 44, RD# 1 Orienr (Long Island), N.Y. 11957 August 23, 1984 Thomas E. Samuels James H. Rambo, Inc. wunneweta Road Cutchogue, New York, 11935 Dear Mr. Samuels, Thank you for your letter of August 1, offering to match funds from the orient Association for a benthic study and core samples of the bay bottom of Hallock's Bay. The Association has formed a committee which will initiate a broad investigation of the problems of Hallock's Bay, including farm runoff and the threat posed by nearby residential development, and of the possible solutions to these problems. We intend to work closely with local government and conservation groups, and at this time are in no position to commit- private funds to addressing one limited aspect of the problem. SinceJ:".~lY , ,;-'" /C ~... ."L.-<..".C;: /) -d7:;~ ~. , Fred Letson, President The orient Association CCI Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Conservation Council N.Y.S.D.E.C. Southold Town Trustees Mr. Stuart Horton Dr. Orville Terry " . . AUG 24 1984 ORIENT ASSOCIATION Box 44, RD# 1 Orient (Long Island), N_y' 11957 August 23, 1984 Southold Town Trustees Southold, New York, 11971 Re: Wetland Application no.212, Thomas E. Samuels Dear Sirs, We are enclosing copies of our letters to the DEC of June 9 and July 11 regarding this application. It should be noted that the DEC has in its file letters representing some thousand persons, including the Bayrnen's Association, the North Fork Environmental Council, the orient Association and private petitioners, pleading that this area not be developed. We urge that no permission be given to alter this site in any way until final dispensation is made as to its use; The proposal to build a rip-rap revetment should be considered as part of the entire proposal to develop the land. The land in question has only a five-foot elevation and is entirelY flooded during heavy rains, which should disqualify it from residential development under Section A 106-36C of the Wetlands Ordinance. Further, it is directly adjacent to a 50-foot public right of way to swimming and shellfishing, and with its low elevation would have a sanitary system which would pose a direct-threat to the health and safety of bathers and shellfishers and to the bay itself due to drainage and seepage back into the bay. It should be noted that the "Settlers" property directly across Narrow River Road is subdivided into 10, 11, and 12 acre lots at precisely this point owing to the poor quality of soil and water drainage at that end, and the building envelopes there are at the opposite end of the lots. Further, a minimum of 5-acre zoning has been recommended for this area to preserve the ~uality of the bay and the water-table. As to the use of rip-rap per ~, conservationists have argued that if anything is to be done it should be an earthen dike planted with bayberry and groundsel, with the area above and below it replanted to establish the narsh; earth dikes have surrounded Hallocks Bay since the hurricane of 1938 and have withstood many storms without erosion. If the short environmental assessment form submitted by the applicant, who has answered all the,uestions in the negative, may be taken to refer to the projected development as a whOle, questions #5,8,10,13 and 15 should be definitely marked affirmative, and #3 and 4 at least (11;lestionable. r.-., _ -- --;>/;;;;J)'C '-ii-L::>~- L - - ~Letson, President Orient Association cc:Southold Conservation Advisory Council NYSDEC Southold Town Planning Board /' ~ 'r. . . AUG 24 1984 ORIENT ASSOCIATION June 9, 1984 Mr. Dennis W. Cole NYSDEC, Bldg. 40 SUNY-Room 219 Stony Brook, N. Y. 11794 RE: Application of Thomas Samuels, Tidal wetlands 10-84-0175 Dear Mr. Cole, On behalf of the Orient Association, we, the undersigned, urge the NYSDEC to re-evaluate the SEOR determination on Thomas Samuels' application for sub-division, Tidal wetlands, 10-84-0175. We believe that a careful site inspection of the property will show that development of this land will have a significant. effect on the environment. We respect the right of an individual to develop land Eor financial gain only insofar as it does not encroach u~n the rights and income of others. Hallock Bay is a prime source of shellfish whose output has been valued at upwards of two million dollars per annum. The Southold Town Planning Board has determined that the proposed septic systems would be too close to Hallock Bay for safety, and we agree. The Planning Board also questions the accuracy of the applicant's survey with regard to elevation and the actual square footage of buildable land. We question the applicant's claim that the water quality is accaptable. We also question the effect of development upon the already fragile aquifer. In his letter to the Planning Board of May 8, 1984 (enclosed herewith), the applicant claims that development will afford significant benefits to the quantity and quality of available water. He bases this claim on comparable use of the property as farmland. In truth, because severe storms from the East flood the uDlan~.rtion of this small, irregularly-shaped tJl~-s-.A't" ' propertYAsevera imes a year, the land cannot be and never has been farmed. Therefore, development of the land would constitute a one hundred per cent increase in water consumption and contamination. Site examination will also raise questions regarding the so-called masonry walls which appear on the survey well within the ordinary high water mark. The broken masonry relic of the old Hallock dock a~tually lies outside the shore line. As the Planning Board has stated, there is question about the accurate measurement of the property. ., r .. . . ,- ORIENT ASSOCIATION Hr. Dennis W. Cole- 2 Regarding this broken wall, we are apprehensive a.bout how it will be replaced and what type of dredging and earth moving this might entail. The applicant, who owns a dock-building facility, has already destroyed many wetland indicators and has broken. through part of the existing dike. Hallock Bay and Narrow River are now under consideration for preservation by both Nature Conservancy and New York State. The area's practical value as a source of income to residents of Southold Town, as well as its priceless value as a rare, natural preserve, require consideration befor~ any change is approved. We urge you to make a thorough examination of the particulars of this application before you arrive at a decision. Sincerely, 1 . . ORIENT ASSOCIATION AUG 24 1984 July 11, 1984 Hr. Dennis W. Cole NYSDEC, Bldg. 40 SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, N. Y. 11794 RE: Application of Thomas Samuels, Tidal Wetlands 10-84-0175 Dear Hr. Cole, We request that this letter be considered an addendum to our correspondence of June 9, 1984. ror the same reasons stated in that letter, we object to the more recent application to install concrete rip-rap on the Narrow River Road property before the mean high water mark is established accurately by a new survey. If any of the rip-rap is intended for the inside of the existing masonry walls, its installation will cover and fill a significant amount of beach and wetland. Development of this.land will have a pivotal effect on the future health and quality of Hallock Bay. Again, we encourage thorough site examination of the property. We also urge you to weigh carefully the issues raised in correspondence by and on behalf of the many people who will be effected by your deciSion. . Sincerely, Committee for Planning Board issues ORIENT ASSOCIATION William E. Ashworth Dorothy H. Berks Jerie R. Newman Helen Proud Gertrude K. Reeves William Y. Terry Frederica wachsberger AUG 2 1984 . . _ElH-UJJalle. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y. 11968 PHONE: (516) 283-1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 734-5858 Auc;ust 1, 1'=)81!- Southold Tovm Planninc Board Tmm Hall Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Att: Hr. '3. Orlos1;i Be: Narrow River Rd. r.1inor subdivision Dear Mr. Orloski: Enclosed please find requested additional survey data on the referenced project. ;!jay I assume that you will not table this matter further. I m~T assure you that preservation of open space in the nublic interest can not be accomnlished at 1)rivate" cost. Please lot ne know if and \'ihen ;you choose to hea:c' further on this matter. SiEc.erel~y , ~. ,"\~0 \~.\ ~i _' 0\ . . T D Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 5, 1984 Dennis W. Cole NYSDEC, BUilding 40 SUNY-Room 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794 Re: Application of Thomas Samuels Tidal Wetlands Permit No. 10-84-0175 Dear Mr. Cole: At the regular meeting of June 4, 1984 of the SoutholdTown Planning Board the fOllowing was taken. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board state their objections to the DEC regarding the application of Thomas Samuels for a tid?l wetlands permit which are.as follows: 1. No evidence was found that a proper topographic survey was performed on the site. 2. The location of mean high water-an on site inspection reveals that mean high water was found to be at elevation five (5) according to the survey received by this office. 3. That the existing dike has been interrupiEd cut through) to drain the propeFty. 4. That the sanitary systems, due to the high ground water table and the low elevation of the property, may seep due to the ground water run-off, back into the Bay. 5. Due to the approximate mean high water line, that the lot sizes may be reduced below the zoning requirements. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN TOWN PLANNING BOARD Q ~\ <\'\ 0.:..11-<1 . s~ultze, ~~retary ec: Thomas SamuelS. ; .. .' · .J1JN 1 ~984 42li KING STREET ORIENT. NY 11957 /' .5~Icf, 1r{6Y' ~..~ kvw~J: iw~ r p(jlWl~ ~~~ r +t ~ r$/~ t ~ W~ ~ Gv.e..A- &vJt;j~..K - , ~ ~(}.~O ~ f1: rtlr ~ <1>~J. S~ ~ ~<- ~ ,t r...p....... to Ii s;."....a, a f f [;,/.;.. -C- ~~.~c. -. / ~.~h ~~~ . ~ . . '.'!" ~ c- 'r.r'J ... - -' I~ l ') ,~,' ---'I (~ South old Town Baymen's Assn. lnc. POST OFFICE BOX 523 GREENPORT, LONG ISLAND, N.Y. 11944 June 13, 1984 Mr. Dennis W. Cole New York state Department of Environmental Conservation Bldg. 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, N. Y. 11794 HE: TIDAL \ifETLANDS APPLICATION 10-84-0175 Dear Mr. Cole, I am writing to register the Southold Town Baymen's Asso- ciation's objection to the application cited above. It is well kno.m to your Department that Hallock's Bay pro- vides a livelihood to many fishermen who harvest thousands of bushels of shellfish there -- a major source of income to this East End area. I would mention also that to help maintain this high level of productivity the Baymen's Association and Southold Town have cooperated for the last fifteen years in a shellfish conservation program. We feel that ~he building of houses on the edge of the bay would threaten what we have worked hard to achieve and maintain over these many years. This wetlands application, following as it does a recent proposal for construction on Gid's Island, indicates the growing pressure exerted by speculators to develop this untouched tract and, with the example of Great South Bay, argues for a conservation plan for the whole periphery of Hallock's Bay, Sinc~ Chester Begley Acting President cc: ~~. Frank ~phy, SUpervisor, Town of Southold Board of Trustees, Town of Southold Planning Board, Town of Southold Assemblyman Joseph Sawicki <r- ,~ z ~ ~ ,. ~ ~ "l - ,") ~ .~ ~ ~ 11 \l 4 ~" ~ ~ i 'S -,.s. ~ ..... - ~-l. I ~ ~ .... ~ ~5 - <' -0 u t: ; ---"\ t ~\ ~ \- AI c ... c:; " ~ ~ ,; ~ 1 ~ 'l.J s; , ~ ~ ~ t, ~- '" <lJ ~ ~ ~ ! 1 ~ \J'J l ~ ~ "IS ~ <;. () .~ < -~ -1 ~ r " ~ ~ ~ ~ ..Sl 10 ,,J ~ <.:s ~ ~ 6 C Ii ..I- c o " " ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ s '"\ ..$ Il 00 1~ 6 "7\:)1 1~~ Il ") \J ..., ~ C: '" <;:" -t) IJ ~ "I .J/l. c:l i 15 i 'Ii ~ ,j .!' \J -y ~ <\J -Jil . ';) c _ ~ -Jl ~ .j vi r' ~ :> .l, . ::J 11 ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ c ~ '" .,... -hVl0::1-l ~ - v """ "'" ~.., " ~:C'3" '\l~ ~ ~ j ~ ,~ 7Q ""'-1$ ~ (j o ~ 0':>00 c.:::: 6'li e V) " '"") .Q VI ~ \~. 0 :3 '~ 'l'" ':z. t ~ ~~~ ~-:~ i ~ . c ~ ~ ~'~ Ib r""h:. "\.$J ~,,\S ~ _ ~ s :'{ ~ 1\) .... <<> - -I- < 3';~~1~~:b -.j ~ <> Ib~ f ~ ~ ->- ~-:f. ~~~;. " ~ ~ <J \J \~ ~ ~ c " , ., " ~~ ro ~ - - ... ~'" <:s ~ ~ " .~ I::: ~ ~ -t '" I,;) _ '-:; ,~~ ;0 "I ~ - ~ I! ., -........ -'- ~"l>G::::,~~ (' .'1 , ~ ~~ ~ " '" 'b ~ '" " b \~ ~ ~~ ~ .I-t ..... '" -:> 't '] .~ 1 ~ :(. (l II - ~ ~ 'i. 6 ~ -.l ~ l :P ~ ~ .C: C o:S ~ (' ~ ~ ~ \l f () \.) ~ \- _TV . " Vi 6 \) IJ c ~~ -b ~ ::. <:D <;.0 <:l " -..l.. 'il.. c ~ - C\:. cr ')- 0 QC ~ ~ \' c s #: I' " ~ ~ <:::. ::> c C- ,_ <. '" v' ~ 9\ ~ " ;; -d '" ~ ':1 o ... ~ I> l" " "I ~ ;::. ? ~ , . lr- c ,.. Q..{. j " \I C ~... ~ ~ .... ,. "" ' v ~ it II-. ?- ~ ~ t> W ~ ~ ~ 'C c '" 'C: It> 1:: 1" :;Lt,~ ~ .. '- " " '" ~ fbt: 't- ) C> \l \l <;> 3 ;. ;\: ~~" " '^ ':I -L. 9> ~ 9 t' t = ~. ~ ~ .-.J ~s:> ~ I" V\ (,. , Co 3 ~~ Cl t' j \:). .J C 1 Q ~ ~ 'U - \ If' :t'>'b;i:~ f. C> r- " \) ~ ~ ~ 0 - cr- - .... g- '\- "cs. -; .:.) '" r; ( ~ ~ ~ ,. ~ c ~ CJl f t-~~ ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ ,,'i, " ~ ~ J- ;" ;t ~ t ,," l) \.- " III ... <;:, \I '" !L ~ \) ~ ~ ) '^ ~~ ~ t I:> f ~ ., ? " [' c.. ~ II t '3' w o --.J (r' ~ ~ y ~~ I> 3 C <:; "'ll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " z ~ t ~-a--ti- c t ~ \l 70"t" P- ? Q.., ~ ~ ~ - .... ~ ~ " ~ c- 1\ ~ 1" 1- 4 ~ 0- <s- <::>c J:, SL ~ " c - 9- it - ~. <4 ';t ~ - ~ --,----,-,------~~,.....--,--..~...,..-,----.---,,'-~... ~~ c. Q ~ " <:l l ~ " 0-\ ~; ~ -0 'G _ (jI \) A: :1 S " ~ W <::. l 1--D- c:. :s (\ .-t. --.. ~ Co -l:. r-' S' c.. '" ::s 'T1 ., ... s ~ ;;;. S :< -I ~IC.: ~. ~ ~~ -. ~ (\ ~Q.r ('~ <:l b- '? ~ /-. ~ ) N ~ ~ 0> " ~ "t: ~ ~ t l } ; ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ::I. '"" f' . o ~. '" ,a r-' o ::s co - co 00 .. ~ ~ ;;; ::s p.. ;z: :< .... .... '" '" ..., . AUG 2 1984 . . JAMES H.RIM.D..Ie. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y. 11968 PHONE: (516) 283-1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 734-5858 August 1, 1984- .8outhold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold, N.Y. 11971 Att: [.jr. Frank Cichanowicz, Chairman Se: Rarrow River Road !-linor subdivision ~ear !-lr. ,Cichanowicz: The proposed rip rap revetment will be totally above mean high water. The concrete roadway, footings and pilings, which presently are in the intertidal range.l will be removed, creating a new intertidal zone capable of supporting low marsh (spartina alternaflora) and high marsh (spartina patens) seaward of the ,revetment. In time, natural revegetation will occur, provided that wave energy allows. We have been successful, in low wave energy areas, in planting low marsh. These plants are plugged on one meter centers and in thirty six months result in a vigorous marsh. Any work of th1S type would, of course, be contingent on my becoming aware of being fairly treated by the Southold Town Planning Board. I am not presently convinced of this treatment. Application originated in November, 1983. If I may be of further assistance, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, C S Th!!!s~e18 C^" v" The Orient Association Southold Town Planning Board N.Y.S.D.E.C. Application No. 10-84--0175 , ,:1;, , :'1" (J:!- \'} \ '" 11\ , ,\ Q::{i..cu..o '\-€.v:> 4 5,\' fJ,,- -f "l A-' 0) ~I': r~ v . AUG 2 19B.f . JAMESH.UMBO,IIC. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y. 11968 PHONE: (516) 283-1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 734.5858 August 1, 1984 Association at Large The Orient Association R.R.f}l, Box 44 Orient, N.Y. 11957 Re: Narrow River Rd. Minor subdivision Gentlepersolls: I was aware, of course, of the loss of vigor of Hallocks Bay described by Mr. Horton at the last meeting. I believe that the principal source of the lower- inG of quality of the Bay is f~ operation run off. There can be no question that ~he Orient water quality problems also find this source. Water quantity problems south of the main road are directly related to farm irrigation. It is notable that only after prolonged irrigation do the farmers experience temporary salt water intrusion. Farming, however, is crucial to the preservation of open space. I hope that our farmers can continue to farm economically, for they are most valued citizens. The run off of 'fines' from farm erosion is a national problem. That the vitality of Hallocks Bay has deteriorated may in fact be due to the accumulation of fines (becoming mud) over the productive bottom. In studies done elsewhere in the Town, this has been the case. There are remedies, but I believe a study of Hallocks Bay should be done. I am willing to match funds contributed by the Association for a benthic study and for core samples of the Bay bottom. With this data, an intelligent cont. . .:1' ~ . - _.._...."---_...~.- "..- .. . AUG 2 1984 . cant. approach to the management of the Bay could be made. I remain willing and able to help the Association arrive at the true basis for it's concerns on the environmental quality of Hallocks Bay. Sincerely, C,YG~ __ _ C:-J fz~>' Thomas E. Samuels cc: Hr. Stuart Horton, Main Rd. Orient Dr. Orville Terry, Main Rd. Orient South old Town Planning Board , Southold TO~Tn Conservation Council N.Y.S.D.E.C. (Application No. IO-8~-0175 , - ,YO . .: * ~l)~L"'=> . \'5~E." e4 \~ ll-\t;e; '!II.Ifj,A.~' (()-:)(;rr/..8>JOJ ItJCt..lJO~D IN 77/li: u~or '*? Ie \'1 \~, IT ,,~\W- \..\a'l~ ~l'b\S "Ta"':'Ci,q...\ our 00=- 'Tl-Il::!:-,c:n-a.L- ~'--'C\~13'G T 6,''1.\ ~~ 1 L-O" ~Ci-r_ 2. , - ~ rb~t:-e)t<-J/?JC( .' cc~ S:uw~JJ)) . . ( /,::.. ?ta::lpee- ~t?APJ-\(c. 'SUeve.'l WASlff oN' Sr$ i'b e\Jlo~ Kx.J1..J~ ':0 H~ LCumD/4 os==- IAu:4N' t-!rql-/ ~A.~ - ,01-.1 Oi-t S\(lf I t{';:,f'ecnot.J ~ta::>.LS. --mAl IAI:5M IIfCjIf- W~TUle.-- v...As ftJut-Jo \b ~ A-r e:.l.....eJ. 5 ~OIN'i -ro TI-t/€ SU0J1:!-'f f?8,J~~ ~ '1l4\S oPPta::; . .8) IHprr 'Tl-ilt' ~(SlllJCI DI~ Ms ~ )1"T15e1JP7?=..-o G:-Ul -rHIWUA 0 1(:> ~. N l1-l15 F\2e:lP!:2TY 4) -rwAT" ~ 'SANllAe<( ':S'lSf76;US I ~ 7z::> If.Jlf tl\G.\4. q0:.:UlJD l...).c>~ --.,-c.e.l..IE ,C,/-,Jo ~ LQL.....l ~'lJATlO!J. OJ::: 11-\~ ~e:r'f I IIIA'i SlP5P I QLl~ 7b C/fZdUNO wp..~ ~~-O?FI 'B'->.qL.. \\-..\~ --rK ~ e:A. 'i -5) t:::v~ /l7 -n-Jif API"IZO":'IU1A-ru' ij'{t.m.fo...l r-\\~l-\ l>-5A:T~lL-- L./I'I~ I /liAr -t1Id/ tor s/:cg.s iAA"i ~ ~00~C> ~ 11-115' :CONI ~c\ ~1re.J;:7J't(arT5. . . . JUN 151984 _SH.....IIC. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y. 11968 PHONE (516) 283-1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 734.5858 June 13, 1984 Mr. Bennett Orloski Jr. Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Minor subdivision Orient Dear Mr. Orloski: I have received your letter of June 5, 1984 and will be pleased to comply with your request for additional information, in order that you can make a prompt decision. The Planning Board received my application on November, 1983. On January 12, 1984 SEQRA action commenced. For a period of six months, any and all requests for data have been promptly attended to. Six months later, additional data has now been requested after consideration of Town purchase of the property, or a portion thereof. I trust that you are concerned with treating your applicants in good faith. I am perplexed by your actions to date. Enclosed you will find a decision concerning the wetland portion of the property seaward of the farm dikes. Sincerely, T ~ 1Q\f->\~ , . . T j\}N 15 \984 D Southold, N,Y. 11971 HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr., Ouzjrman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr. GEORGE RJTCHIE LATHAM,Jr. WILUAM F. MULLEN,1L TELEPHONE 765. 1938 January 12, 1984 Thomas Samuels 89 Haywater Drive Nassau Point Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Minor Subdivision of Thomas Samuels Located at Orient Dear Mr. Samuels: The follwoing action was taken at the Southold Town Planning Board meeting, Monday, January 9, 1984. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board does not grant sketch approval of the Minor Subdivision of Thomas Samuels, located at Orient. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act for the MillOL Subdivision of Thqmas Samuels, located at Orient. An initial determination of non-significance has been made. Upon review of the above mentioned proposal, it is the concensus of the board that more information is required. Please complete the enclosed forms and return them, along with three (3) copies of the above captioned map, to this office so we may begin SEQRA action. If you have any questions, contact this office. very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN P~ING BOARD ~~ .E'. (\A By Diane M. Schultze . (5\~ Enclosure . granted; and the.er in the Wager proceeding should ~firmed, 'with costs. __ '. ~r r *. f ~ ,.-- ~F\' " , JASEN, GABRIELLI. .JONES, WACHTL~~ amI FUCHSBERG, ,,~:~ .l.. (; 1,;;:~4 JJ.. concur. COOKE, J.. taking no part. In Matter of Board of Educ. of Enlarged Ogdensburg City School Dist. (Wager Constr. Cor".): Order affirmed. In Matter of Board of Educ., Union Free School Dist. No.8, Pearl River (Gramercy Contrs.): Order reversed, etc. o lUYlUalIEllSYSUM 37 N.Y.2d 292 .J:.'2 ...L DOLPHIN LANE ASSOCIATES. LTD., Appellant. v. TOWN OF SOUTIIAlIIl'TON, Responde'lt. and Trustee. of the Freeholdero and Commonalty of the Town of Southampton, Intervenor.Reopondent. Court of Appeals of New York. July 2, 1975. Action was brought to establish the boundary line of plaintiff's shoreside property. The Supreme Court, Special Term, William I. Geiler. J., 72 Misc.2d 868, entered jlidgment with respect to boundary line and an appeal was taken. The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second JUllicial Department, 43 A.D.2d 727, 351 N.Y.S.2d 364. affirmed and appeal was by permission. The Court of Appeals, Jones, J., heid that it was error as a matter of law to locate the high-water line along the shoreside property by reference to the type of grass test rather than the traditional line of vel\'etution test. Order modifit.~1 an,i case remitted for further proceedings in accordance with opinion and, as, so_ modified, affirmed. ~. 1. Navigable Wate.. .,." ~6(3) In determining lncation of high~water line along bay and thus the location of northern hou ndsJry of owner's lot, court erred as a matter of law by reference to the. type of grass test introduced by the town, and the line of vegetation which had been traditionally used by surveyors was the proper test.i I, . . 2. Navigable W. -36(3) a . Location o~undary for shoreside property depen~n a combi- nation of the verhal formulation of the houndary line, that is, the high-water line, and the application of the traditional and customary method by which that verbal formulation has been put into. practice in the past to locate the boundary line along the shore in view of the importance of stability and predictability in matters involving title to real property. ...1.. Michael Permut, New York City, for appellant. ...l!." Renry Root Stern, Jr., John P. Rederman, Richard B. Marrin and John J. Witmeyer, III, New York City, for respondent and intervenor- respondent. ...1.. Bernard S. Meyer and Stephen P. Seligman, New York City, for the .J!." New York State Land Title Ass'n, amicus curiae. ...1..peter V. Snyder, Patchogue, for the New York State Ass'n of ...l!." Professional Land Surveyors, amicus curiae. JONES, Judge. [1] We hold that it was error as a matter of law for the lower courts in this case to ground determination of the location of the high-water line along the southern shore of Shinnecock Bay and thus the location of the northern boundary of appellant's property in the Town of. Southampton by reference to the type-of-grass test intro- duced by respondent town. It is not seriously disputed in formulation that the northern bound- ary line of appellant's property facing on Shinnecock Bay is the high-water line. The lower courts so held and we concur. The sharp dispute between the parties, joined by others asserting a broad inter- est in the outcome, is as to the method or P"tof .by which the high-water mark shall be precisely located on the land. In our perception and analysis of the problem it is misleadingly simplistic to conclude that resolution of this issue turns on the results of an exhaustive scientific search for the precise line of average high water. No legal significance attaches to the exact identification alonlU!his .J!.II. portion of the south shore of Long Island of refined hydrographic data. The issue placed before the courts in this litigation is a more practical, less sophisticated determination-location of the boundary line of property, title to which has passed from owner to owner until it has now vested in appellant. Other aspects of the dispute between appellant's predecessor in title and the Town of Southampton with respect to ownership of the property in question were compromised by a survey and exchange of deeds at the turn of the century. We see no warrant, however, for . disteng the conclusion of the trial cou.ow affirmed at the ..Appellate Division, that the resolution of differences reach"..1 in 1899 did not ('xlc'lIfl to U1' tutU'h on t.he locat.ion ur the norLhl~I'n, Hhillllcl~uel<. Ba~' boundary of the property. [2] Attaching real significance as we do to the importance of stahility and predictahility in matters involviog' title to real property, we hold that the )o<.."tion of the !Joundal'y to this shOl'C-side p,'op",.ty depends on a combination of the verbal formulation of the boundary line-i. c., the high-water line-and the application of the traditional and customary method by which that verbal formulation has been put in practice in the past to loCate the boundary line along the shore. To. accept tbe linguistic definition but then to employ an entirely new technique, however intellectually fascinating, for the application of that definition, with the result that the on-the-site line would be significantly differently located, would do violence to the expectations of tbe parties and introduce factors never reasonably within their contemplation. Thus, to recognize, as the town's argument must, that the type-of-grafs test for location of the high-water mark may one day be ,'eplaced by an even more sophisticated and refined test for determining the high-water line, with a consequent shift again in the on-the-site location of a northern boundary line, is to introduce an element of uncertainty and unpredictability quite foreign to the law of conveyancing, The evidence in this case was really not disputed that prior to this litigation it had been normal practice to locate the high-water line by reference to the line of vegetation. If a change is to he made in the procedures for locating shore-side boundary lines to conform more precisely to hydrographic data, in our view, such innovation should be left to the Legislature. ..1.!." ..L There was uncontroverted testimony here that it was the long- standing practice of surveyors in the Town of Southampton to locate shore-line boundaries by reference to the line of vegetation. To give effect to such uniform practice is not, as the town contends, to delegate arbitrary powers to surveyors to determine property lines; rather it is the obverse, namely, to recognize thllt property lines arc fixed by reference to long-time surveying practice. The Attorney- 'General has recagrii7.ci\ the authenticity of the prnctice (33 N.Y. State Dept.Rep. 415, 421). In Town or Southampto/1 v. M~'Cox Bay Oyster Co. (116 N.Y. 1. 16. 22 N.E. 387, 392) in interpreting the language oC the Dongan Patent, we wrote: "Even thoul\'h it be susceptihle oC the -meaning claimed Cor it by the appellant.., the strict letter of the instrument must now give way to the practical construction adopted and acted upon hy the inhahitants of the town. Upon such construc- tion all the private titles to lan,ls within the town rest; and. as has . . ,t.; ,!/ ~. !.:; 1:%~' .oIl',L .~' }'I'; '11-' Jli" been aperiately said in the brief of the leu. counsel fOl' the ,'esl'ondent 'court., should not undertake. to reverse the action and . (r:ulitions or ('c.mllll'i(~~, ancl ('ha"~(' titlt':ol whie'h have !lC.'('OIlW v('~h'(l tlndel' contl"m'y views'." The cuntrolling' principle hc."c is that of which we wrote in Heyert v. Orange.& Rockland Utilities (17 N.Y.2d 352, 363, 271 N.Y,S.2d 201, 209, 218 N.E.2d 263, 269): "Whatever the ...lIe mig-ht he if this WCI'C a ca.'I(' of first impression, it is cC/'Lain that Lhousands of deeds convcying right." of way hetwccn private parties nod instruments of dedication of puhlic highways have been made on Lhis rulc, which has exisLed since the common Jaw began in this State and which received its most recent expression unequivocally in this court in 1959. It has ripened into a rule of property which cannot be changed retrospectively without alLering the substance of prior land grants. " Accordingly, we hold that it wa.' error here to rely on independent, ~lovel means for location of the '1igh-water mark. The calIC Sh9Uld be rcmi94dJ,or .the limited pU.r!>ose of determining the location of the noi'diern boillidary of the property by reference to the line of veget.!L- tion. We have examined appellant's other contention. with ......pect to the trial court's determination that there i. an easement in favor of the public between the high-waleI' mark of the Atlantic Ocean and the southerly top edge of the sand dunes and appelll,lnt'. related argument that by the adjudication upholding such easement it was deprived of property without due pl'oCeSS of law, and find them to be without merit. ..L The order of the Appellate Division should be modified to direct .J!." rcmittal to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to deLermine the northern boundary line of the property by reference to the line of vegetation, and, as so modified, the order should be affirmed. BREITEL, C, J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, WACHTLER, FUCHS- BERG and COOKE, JJ" concur. Order modified, without costs, and case remitted to Supreme Court, SufColk County, for furthcr proceedings in accordance with .the opin- ion herein. and, as so modified, afCirmed. w o i KEY NUMIU SYSTEM . '. ~ '. ., "..)__,J :(In I, -I.., j l~ 0'i , Legal Notice NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPUCATlON Date: May 18, 1984 Applicant: 'lbomasSamueIs Address: Haywalers Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 , Permits applied for and ap- plication number(s> Tidal Wetlands, IIHl4-0175. Project description and location. Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. . Create a twl)olot residential subdivision by dividing a 3.75 acre parcel into two lots having 83,300 square feet and 80,000 square feet. The parcel is located on tbe east side of Narrow River Road in Orient, New York, SCTM No.llJOO.027- 2-3. ' SEQR DETERMINATION: SEQR-3 Project is an unlisted action; it has been determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. SEQR LEAD AGENCY New York State DEC. AVAILABILITY FOR PUB- LIC COMMENT: Applica- tions may be reviewed at the address listed below. Com- ments on the project must be submitted to the Contact Person indicated below by no later than June IS, 1984. CONTACT PERSON: Dennis W. Cole NYSDEC, Bldg. 40, SUNY-Room 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794 (516) 751-7900 ITM3H529 -:The, Suffolk 1'imes - f. 2..( . flLA'( -' (: iq~<.f ' .. ~ . '. . CoPy JI15 1984 ORIENT ASSOCIATION June 9, 1984 Mr. Dennis W. Cole NYSDEC, Bldg. 40 SUNY-Room 219 Stony Brook, N. Y. 11794 RE: Application of Thomas Samuels, Tidal wetlands 10-84-0175 Dear Mr. Cole, On behalf of the Orient Association, we, the undersigned, urge the NYSDEC to re-evaluate the SEQR determination on Thomas Samuels' application for sub-division, Tidal Wetlands, 10-84-0175. We believe that a careful site inspection of the property will show that development of this land will have a significant effect on the environment. We respect the right of an individual to develop land for financial gain only insofar as it does not encroach upon the rights and income of others. Hallock Bay is a prime source of shellfish whose output has been valued at upwards of two million dollars per annum. The Southo1d Town Planning Board has determined that the proposed septic systems would be too close to Hallock Bay for safety, and we agree. The Planning Board also questions the accuracy of the applicant's survey with regard to elevation and the actual square footage of buildable land. We question the applicant's claim that the water quality is acceptable. We also question the effect of development upon the already fragile aquifer. In his letter to the Planning Board of May 8, 1984, (enclosed herewith),the applicant claims that development will afford significant benefits to the quantity and quality of available water. He bases this claim on comparable use of the property as farmland. In truth, because severe storms from the East flood the upland portion of this small, irregularly-shaped property with salt water several times a year, the land cannot be, and never has been farmed. Therefore, development of this land would constitute a one hundred per cent increase in water consumption and contamination. Site examination will also raise questions regarding the so-called masonry walls which appear on the survey well within the ordinary high water mark. The broken masonry relic of the old Hallock dock actually lies outside the shore line. As the Planning Board has stated, there is question about the accurate measurement of the property. .,~ . . ORIENT ASSOCIATION Mr. Dennis W. Cole- 2 Regarding this broken wall, we are apprehensive about how it will be replaced and what type of dredging and earth moving this might entail. The applicant, who owns a dock-building facility, has already destroyed many wetland indicators and has broken through part of the existing dike. Hallock Bay and Narrow River are now under consideration for preservation by both Nature Conservancy and New York State. The area's practical value as a source of income to residents of Southold Town, as well as its priceless value as a rare, natural preserve, require consideration before any change is approved. We urge you to make a thorough examination of the particulars of this application before you arrive at a decision. Sincerely, Committee for Planning Board Issues ORIENT ASSOCIATION william E. Ashworth Dorothy M. Berks Jerie R. Newman Helen Proud Gertrude K. Reeves William Y. Terry Frederica Wachsberger cc: Southold Town Planning Board ORIENT ASSOCIATION - RR#l, Box 44, Orient, N. Y. 11957 ~.- . . t'1AY 9 1984 '" JAMES H.RAMBO,ING. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y. 11968 PHONE: (516) 28J.l254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 734.5858 May 8, 1984 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision Narrow River Road, Orient, NY Gentlemen: Allow me to thank you for your courteous attention to the referenced application of last evening. Having dealt with properties of this nature for many years (not, I might add, as principal), I am only too aware of their problems. That such problems become minor given their value is a fact of which you are aware. I would like to state the following: 1. The potential water use on the property is less than 10% of the potential use, if farmed. 2. The elimination of contaminants coincidental with farming is an asset to the Orient water table, (i.e., aquifer). 3. The distance from the MHW mark of the sanitary systems will result in total'safety to Hallock's Creek (Bay) from bacterial and chemical contaminants. 4. The water quality on-site is equal to Orient's water quality, i.e., Temik and higher than average saline levels (but still acceptable to Suffolk County standards which, I might add, are equal or exceed Federal standards). 5. The subdivision meets Town Zoning requirements. 6. Substantial man-made structures between the wetlands and upland (building areas) predating the adoption of the .N. Y. S. D. E. C. regulations should and will eliminate the jurisdiction of that agency as to the buildings. The structures will, however, conform to such regulations. <Con't. ) f)I/-UL _/~.S\ctA V~\CII.\ .t. . . & JAMES H.HAMID.I.C. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y. 11968 PHONE: (516) 283.1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 734.5858 Hay 8, 1984 Page 2 (con't.) ~ll of the above were considered prior to my purchase of the property since all structures will conform to Federal Flood Hazard requirements, I find the statement that the Board should protect the public particularly objectionable and condescending. The implication must be taken, that my intent would be to defraud or misrepresent the property to a prospective buyer. The Board must be aware of its connotation. The prospective purchase of part of the property is, I believe, meant to rlacate a small group of our Town's people. I am philosophically opposed to purchase of small parcels which are not environmentally fragile. The cost of such pur- chases are excessive, generally, given the size of the parcel. I would rather, as a citizen of Southold, see the purchase of truly fragile land in Orient (Pete's Neck, Gide Island, or West Creek in New Suffolk). However, I remain open to the Town's approach in this proposed purchase. The fact that the Town recently purchased the Demarest Boat Ramp in the area also might affect such a purchase. I do not believe that we can realistically expect this to occur. Therefore, I expect that the Planning Board will continue its deliberations on the subdivision of the property and not delay its deliberations o~erlong. This is a leqal subdivision and I trust I will be fairly and justly treated. To quote Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: "l'/e are in danger of forgetting that a strong public desire to improve the public condition is not enough to warrant achieving the desire by a shorter cut than the constitutional way of paying for the change". Most sincerely, cc: Frank Murphy, Supervisor '. 'J)~ilh 'l~~)J _ '.j.JiJJ.C /lMj~; I/'I~, /:1- 11/.-Le' <Y1I),..~, JW114198A v -r J.. rvdA. -I.{ etA. \;, I June 13, 1984 f( I[jj.c.VVA.., Mr. Dennis W. Cole NYS D E C, Bldg 40 SUN Y Room 219 stony Brook, N.Y., 11794 In regard to Thomas Samuels' Tidal Wetlands Application 10-84-0175 Dear Dennis Cole, Our main concern in this matter is the protection of Hallock's Bay and its surrounding inlets and marshes. You well know the value of bay marshes to the whole of aquatic life. They are the seedbed of local fish of every kind and thus the essential nourisher of all sea and ocean life so that we are protecting what is of critical importance to us but also of inestimable value far beyond our local area. How many marsh edged bays are there left on Long Island where the shell fish are clean and where the ospreys nest and fish, where foxes, deer, egrets, heron, and all sorts of wild birds and animals show that this is one area that hasn't been poisoned so far? DO YOU KNOW OF ANY BAY THAT HAS BEEN BULK-HEADED AND BUILT UPON AND STILL HAS RETAINED THE QUALITY OF HALLOCK'S BAY? Permission for one house on Hallock's Bay would set a precedent for a trend that could be irreversible. The property that Mr. Samuels proposes to develop is a low-lying plot between Narrow River Road and Hallock's Bay. It is partly diked in an effort to keep out the water but is flooded periodically. (Incidentally this land was never farmed.) Any development of this property would require additional diking, as well as huge amounts of earth for filling in and most likely the inevitable bulk-heading. There is no way the septic system and general effluent could be completely separated from the bay on this low plot. Mr. Samuels speaks of the available water as having a higher than average saline level. He claims that this is standard Orient water quality. Not so! We do have Temik and Temik filters but we do not drink slightly saline water! Across the road from Mr. Samuels' plot, because of the lowness of the land and the scarcity of potable water, the ~\~\i\ r:;v-u- 'J) t.(JJ1.. P:, .elM)), _ r.(1.A~ "-..I I NAp:;. lA/A., t1- 7J1J.! ~ atllLL JVN 14 198A Wr I. !/.IdA. .J..I ~A.. ~ I K ~jjr:l..Lv~ June 13, 1984 Dear Dennis Cole, Our main concern in this matter is the protection of Hallock's Bay and its surrounding inlets and marshes. You well know the value of bay marshes to the whole of aquatic life. They are the seedbed of local fish of every kind and thus the essential nourisher of all sea and ocean life so that we are protecting what is of critical importance to us but also of inestimable value far beyond our local area. How many marsh edged bays are there left on Long Island where the shell fish are clean and where the ospreys nest and fish, where foxes, deer, egrets, heron, and all sorts of wild birds and animals show that this is one area that hasn't been poisoned so far? DO YOU KNOW OF ANY BAY THAT HAS BEEN BULK-HEADED AND BUILT UPON AND STILL HAS RETAINED THE QUALITY OF HALLOCK'S BAY? Permission for one house on Hallock's Bay would set a precedent for a trend that could be irreversible. The property that Mr. Samuels proposes to develop is a low-lying plot between Narrow River Road and Hallock's Bay. It is partly diked in an effort to keep out the water but is flooded periodically. (Incidentally this land was never farmed.) Any development of this property would require additional diking, as well as huee amounts of earth for filling in and most likely the inevitable bulk-heading. There is no way the septic system and general effluent could be completely separated from the bay on this low plot. Mr. Samuels speaks of the available water as having a higher than average saline level. He claims that this is standard Orient water quality. Not so! We do have Temik and Temik filters but we do not drink slightly saline water! Across the road from Mr. Samuels' plot, because of the lowness of the land and the scarcity of potable water, the ~\~\~ (jv-(r . . 2 developer, Mr. Horowitz, divided this part of his land into ten-acre parcels in order to obtain approval of his sUbdivision. For all of Orient south of the Main Road, because of the lowness of the land and the scarcity of potable water, the Southold Planning Board is recommending five-acre building plots. Mr. Samuels' low three and three-quarters acre bay-edge parcel does not qualify as a suitable building plot. We are counting on you to disallow this dangerous proposal. Thank you. ~~Yt:ll~ t~ Kathleen Leslie Latham Box 25, Orient, N.Y. 11957 copy to Southold Town Planning Board . . 4390 Orchard Street Orient, New York 11957 J'11N 1 4 JUN 14 1984 June 12, 1984 Mr. Dennis Cole New York State Department of Environmental Conservation SUNY at Stony Brook Building 40 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. Cole: SUBJECT: APPLICATION OF THOMAS SAMUELS - TIDAL WETLANDS PERMIT 10-84-0175 I would like to object to the application of Mr. Thomas Samuels to subdivide the property on Narrow River Road, Orient. The parcel is located on Hallock's Bay which has provided shellfishing, including crabs, clams, scallops and mussels, and recreation to area residents. The bay has remained unpolluted while its shores have remained largely undeveloped. An application to the DEC to develop the nearby property of Dr. Frances Perrone, also on Hallock's Bay, was recently withdrawn as the state has indicated its intention to preserve the estuary by purchasing the property. It seems inconsistent that the state would allow subdivision of one property, thereby increasing the threat of pollution of the bay, while purchasing a neighboring parcel to preserve it. It is not necessary for the state to expend additional funds to buy the Samuels' parcel, but it can help preserve the bay by limiting development on its shores. The Town of Southold has recognized the need to protect Hallock's Bay from pollution from sewage contamination and stormwater runoff by calling for a minimum of five- acre zoning around its shores in the preliminary master plan update. The subdivision "Settlers at Oysterponds" on Narrow River Road was required to have five-acre minimum lot size to prevent sewage and stormwater runoff of the development from contaminat- ing Hallock's Bay. The effluent of any sewage disposal system placed on the Samuels property will leach directly into Hallock's Bay, possibly ruining it as an envirQnmental asset for future generations. The fact that the property was flooded by the tides resulting from the storm of March 29 serves notice that placing cesspools on the property will ultimately impact negatively on the water quality of the bay. It is not difficult to imagine that the owners of new homes on the bay would want to place bulkheading and docking facilities. This will require dredging and would further damage the environmental value and scenic beauty of the bay. I urge that the DEC and other agencies responsible for protecting the public interest deny this application for subdivision. ~~\~ cc ~ truly yours, C/~~~'J<cl~r Martin Trent Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Trustees ~ ,\ . pg . 4 . 6/4/84 Gemma site plan cont. tree experts that to pave the drive under the beech tree would compact the soil and probably kill the tree, which is a 200 year old tree. Mr. Emilita questioned the same thing may occur with the poplar and the applicant stated that that tree has a diffrent root system and the beech tree is older and needs less compacted soil. Mr. Emilita stated that on his site inspection he noted the roots of the poplar were protruding from the soil. The Board also questioned if there were going to be any habitable quarters ,upstairs, and the applicant stated that the upstairs would contain an office and storage only, due to the fact that the fire code wou~d not permit living space in that area. The applicant did not be using the adjacent barn, however, ~t would be fixed up to prevent vandalisln. It was the consensus of theBoard to, conduct a field inspection of the property prior to any action. (, * * * Samuels minor subdivision located at Orient. FOllowing an on-site inspection of the property, the Board reviewed the survey. The Board had noted that there appeared to be discrepancies with the survey and the niand. It was' also noted that the applicant had applied to the DEC for a permit and the Chairman read the legal notice which the DEC had published. It was the consensus of the Board to forward to the DEC a letter indicating the Planning Board's concerns. ( On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board state their objections to the DEc regarding the application of Thomas Samuels for a tidal wetlands permit which,are as follows: 1. No evidence was found that a "proper topographic survey was performed on the site. 2. The location of mean high water-an on site inspection reveals that mean high water was found to be at elevation five (5) according to the survey received by this office. 3. That the existing dike has been interrupted (cut through) to drain the property. 4. That the sanitary systems, due to the high ground water table and the low elevation of the property, may seep due to the ground water run-off back into the bay. 5. Due to the approximate mean high water line, that the lot sized may be reduecd below the zoning requirements. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Ward, Wall C The Board had also checked the flmod map and noted that it was elevation A on the map. Ruth Oliva present correspondence to the Planning Board indicating the test hole data for applications ( . 6/4/84 . pg. 5 Samuels located at Orient cont. to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services on surrounding land. It was th e consensus of the Planning Board to request from the applicant a topographic survey indicating thanean high water, wetlands area, actual location of the dike, and elevations at l' intervals. Mr. William Ashworth and Mr. Arthur Smith also expressed their. objections to this proposal, as well as, Ruth Oliva. They all commented that they don't want to see Hallock's Bay polluted as it is a source for the local fisherman. Mr. Orville Terry expressed his objection with this proposal and stated that he strongly disagreed with the .Negative Declaration to be issued to the Cross Sound Ferry proposal located at ,Orient. \ * * * On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, secondffiby Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that .the Southold Town Planning Baord aoprmTf" t-ho minnt-oQ of the regular meeting of March 12. 1984. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward ( On a motion' made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Tpwn Planning Board approve the minutes of the regula~ meeting of April 9L 1984. VOTE of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes of the special meeting of March 30, 1984. Vote of the Board: Ayes: orlowski~. MUllen, Latham, Wall, Ward On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED th~the Southold Town Planing Board approve the minutes of the ~pecialmeeting of April 2, 1984. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mul'len, Latham, Wall, Ward On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the SoutholdTown Planning Baord approve the minutes of the special :neeting of April 12, 1984. l Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Wall, Ward On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the minutes of the Speciul meeting of April 23, 19l:l4. .........0 .....4' .....0 l'l.....'''..n. IIvo",or 1 (>w~ki. Mu lIen.. Latham. Wall, Ward IV ,'\ . ; . luJ/yy'Jjj':n)1 '. 10 boo-^d o.-i' I ; {P /If/Vt/ @ #1 n~-h~ ~ t'. O! i v C\.... . , . ,~ (f) *L JZ 1 _1,: // / ; I . ; .{: 43 .... .;, :,/. ,(j) " ",,1/\.' '-"::" '~ ~ -=t,/. , , /~ - - ....--'. iDS I,.,.. lor... 'fill' nFI"'... 97'i"1Iil,. ~ ""f'l, .... pI"" c. l.J'TI1 , ~ , fO...wV'IH -R.qls~ $'"' , -n. , )~' 7. 'b, , ~' . ;,., '--. #-S-oV - 4T p. f;. , 4'. .:;."""'06 ~~;1 ::1 ", P' Wet.&,,'-l g 'a " 1-' t.J~c..'" .'l-GJ (1" >:1 ~t .. / , (.J c."1L =It a. W~t..," 'If: S' SWL 10' V{c-u-- .,jJ 1 b '0 , -tJ')- 7 bO Jl3 3 "/3 .#5 ~ ~O ", ._1 .~ : , -I. ~, ! ,+~- If... ;'''d'' :,;\;t>< . *.""f;'- , -~:_-. -',:f;,;::;}~:;'" ,- ,-r,: :;-:::-,_,_":,,;., _:~~_~-:-~---,--., ;::~~:. 'j~';-"'~'_"'Yi"'lItf~o!>'> ,'. -.~ .::rm . hI S #' I f .5/"s# IE ;J~ JL-' , L f'F: lLlJ. \:If"" O-L.. . I ~-z 9-=#= j~tG p#< ,oA 'q:'-L. -elF .' i - ;rr~-'-' -+ ~ X ,/I:- ~ v 1;,10 -11.Jr/7J ~.:h=- =-)( _-;)>10 J, 71;1 H ' ) Lab No. "3 f::L ~ 'f 7 , Field N6. ~ 0 '- Date: 'l ~ I 5 - i 1. crime: PW\ Col. By: '> E'1 FA 1t"'N (Name n~t initials) . Date Re~~ived in Lab ;YI(~__- . . Public Water Priv~e Water OID";;+< Date Completed Examined By SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER Location W €t.L # f Otelt.fJ J ~-fbM~ ~r District fie 'il~ ~ \ 1'=1:. ~tJl1 "")) ( U . Name Point of Collection Remarks: fh$lJ I}. Jt 11 S I CJ 1>/ I I Free Ammonia (mg/l N) C- o. 0 T.Hardness (mg/l CaCOa) C.O.D. (mg/ll -- - Nitrites + ~ I lr D T. Alkalinity (mg/1 CaCCa T. Solids (mg/l) - 180' C Nitrates (mo/1 N) ~ MBAS (mg/l) /Ir I Ca Hardness (mg/1 CaCOa) D. Solids (mg/ll- 180' C pH ~ ;:) l..J Mg Hardness(mgJI CacOal S. Solids (mg/ll - 180" C Spec. Cond. -; - .. Free CO2 (Nomograph) B.O.D. (mg/ll ",mhos/em Chlorides (mg/I ClI d" Turbidity (Units) IJ.s i--" j) ~I-'" ... Sulfates (mg/l 504) ~I;; Color (Unitsl 5e..-- ""~ { Iron (mg/l Fe) I.. ~O I 0 Cadmium "--'/1 Cd) t.,.- - ~ ....~ . F Manganese (mg/l Mo) Silver (mg/1 Ag) , . Copper (mg/l Cu) ::::: ~ 0 I 0 lead (mg/I Pbl I..... :::. I 0 Zinc (mg/l Zn) I.- fI ~ Hexavalent Chromium (mon) Sodium (mg/l No) 130 t; Cyanide (mg/1 CN) Nitrites (mg/l N) Fluoride (mg/1 Fl Partial 'tfJ Complete 0 Resample 0 ~orm No. PHl-' I DIRECTOR Ca,/ JJ. JJaIU& 18.308 lab No: Field No. Date: .Time: Co\. By: 3l'JJ'1~- roY 3-1'5-- F't /'I~ Se.~ ~-" n rJ/ (Name not initials) Date Received in lab ..s /1 ~I J ') Public Water Priv'ate Water Other ~ LS~ Date Completed ~ Examined By Location SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER tJtEU- 1ft- Q 60' ~~ I/.. "1IiJD' tJrlc# r ~c.JM p C!(A~J. ;,{;/(tJt..J I n ~o }1V' Name Point of Collection Remarks: /!t50 II C' C'J r// ~ Je / Free Ammonia (mg/l N) - 1,11 T.Hardness (mg/l CaC03) C.O.D. (mg/ll -..--- Nitrites + fI' ~ ,. D . Nitrates ("'!IiI N) ~ T. Alkalinity (mgll CaC0:3 T. Solids (mg/l)- 180. C MBAS (mg/l) t. 01 Ca Hardness (mgll CaC03) D. Solids (mg/l) - 180. C , laz pH Mg Hardnesslmg/l CaC03) S. Solids (mg/l)- 1800 C Spec. Cond. S .~ :1 Free CO2 (Nomagraph) B.O.D. (mg/l) ",,",hos/cm Chlorides (mg/l CIl I.f, 3 Turbidity (Uniu) As -" b I' Sulfates (mg/l S04) II laI Cfl Color (Units) ~- .... .. r l!on(~o:.). ,; . :.-- I,. I 0 Cadmium (~ Cd) -- l.- l... Manganese (mg/l Mn) ~ ~ I"l r Silver (mg/l Ag) ~ r<::. Copper (mg/l CuI I-- 0 I " Lead (1R!dI Ph) = . :J ..:: .... Zinc (mgll Zn) :::. 0 W Hexavalent . Chromium (mall) Sodium (mgll Na) Z ~ 19 Cyanide (mgll CN) Nitrites (mg/l N) Fluoride (mgll F) I ':o.E.JJ. ..Jl. - Partial 9t Complete 0 Resample 0 auM DIRECTOR 'orm No. PHL.' J8.308 . . Name UJc IA. :# 'l... Date Received in Lab J/IVt:.=--_ ~ Public Water 'I . 'I Prillllte Water :1 Other~c... I: Date Completed !, Examined By I, I I SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES ' PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER (9J b~" 1F~or -/!of! 0 IJ I Ta.. (" "'\ ..) fJ 8 Ol{/. Lab No. Field No. Date: 'Time: Col. By: 3o:>';J.'I~ ,-o~ J-/~- t.. ,P/h :'t."" ,cl'/..enl (Name not initials) Location t),f IC",u T "j1J /If jJ Point of Collection Remarks: At 5lJ /Is/ ~~/ C"- ?i / - . 1 Free Ammonia (mg/l NI 1/ 1. O~ T.Hardness (mg/l Cac031 C.O.D. (mg/l) Nitrites + . I Nitrates (mall NI 0 (" ) T. Alkalinity (mgll Cac~ T. Solids (mgll) . 180' C MBAS (mg/ll t 0 .I Ca Hardness (mgll CaC031 D. Solids (mg/l) . 180' C I IJ pH & I..: Mg Hardnesslmgll CaC031 S. Solids (mgll) .180' C II I Spec. Cond. ~ r~ Free CO2 (Nomagraphl B.O.D. (mg/Il I ..,mhos/em ~ m ~ Chlorides (mg/l ell 'f 2 Turbidity (Uniul ~ I~ "'" - ~ (l,,1 Sulfates (mg/l S041 I ... ~ Color (Units) ~ " Iron (mg/l Fel c:: ~ 0 I ~ Cadmium ""'II Cdl ~ - '1 I ~ ... , . - - - -- --- ~ . "-- -, I I Manganese (mg/l Mnl ~ '" ,.. Silver (mgll Ag) - Copper (mg/l CoI I.. ~ 0 J () Lead (JIllIlL.Pbl :...:: f::: J I~ I Zinc (mg/l Znl ~ ~ ~ Hexavalent - Chromium (m.1I1 Sodium (mg/l Nal .l- q l3 Cyanide (mgll CNI 11 Nitrites (mgll NI Fluoride (mgll FI Partial ~ Complete D Resample 0 DIRECTOR Ca,.1 j/ J/2"44 Form No. PHL.l J8.308 . . Lab f'Jo. Field 'No. .Dale: Time: Col. By: JiS-"-'71J ,>07 3 -;p;'; t. 1."'1 r: It Ie '/).j. (Name not initials) . Date Received in Lab . Public Water Private Water Other Date Completed Examined By ;Y/V::,,?::-__ t.J rH. Name SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY CflEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER I 'A:'"~ ~ -#- 3> ~ne-;)r (A/ <,;. .. ... District ~.f 0 c.J ,.n. S..rn I> IV Point of Collection O;R/~IJT 7tJ""'? Location Remarks: 1ft. 5 0 AT, Itl {el r-," Free Ammonia (mg/l N) ~ 0 Ot, T.Hardness (mg/l CaC031 C.O.D. (mgnl Nitrites + ~ ~ T. Alkalinity (mgn Cac~ T. Solids (mg/l) - 180' C Nitrates (mgn N) MBAS (mg/l) (t; I Ca Hardness (mgn CaC03) D. Solids (mgn) - 180' C pH .~ r~ Mg Hardnesslmg/l Caco3) S. Solids (mgn) - 180" C Spec. Cond. '1 ~ 1< .. Free CO2 (Nomagraph) B.O.D. (mg/l) ....mhos/em Chlorides (mg/I CIl I.) 3 Turbidity (Units) ~ '", ~ ,.. b Sulfates (mg/l S04) ~ 3 Color (Units) -< e.. '.. ~ J ~Iron (mg/l Fe) ~ (;, J 0 Cadmium l-!n Cd) ::::: I-- 2- - .-~ .~- -.--- _.". f'> Ie of "'anganese (mg/l Mn) .. Silver (mgn Ag) =:opper (mg/l Cu) ... ~ ()J ') Lead '-" Ph) .. ~I b -.0 line (mg/l Zn) " :.-. r.J Hexavalent Chromium (mg/l) :odium (mg/l Na) I .3 f1 Cyanide (mg/l CN) ~itrites (mg/l N) Fluoride (mgn F) Partial "fJ Complete 0 Resample 0 i ~"m No. PHL-' . ~ DIRECTOR e....t JI. .J.I..- 18-308 Lab No. F'~'ld' No. . Date: Time: Col. By: 3(~;>' '7'1 ~~~ J L 7"^- 5\"'1 ""11 11'H (Name not initials) . Date Received in Lab 0/1 "",.,~ _ .. .. . Public Water Pl'ivate Water I Other JC1r~~(' Date Completed -: ~'_ Examined By ~ - c - SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER Name 'U)cLL :tt~ ~ror IS nct ~7 o~.n- SIR )>'V' Location OK/c"uT --j=>CJ",~ Point of Collection Remarks: At.so /lSI ~ I C~ !?f, Partial ~ Complete 0 Resample 0 Free Ammonia (mg/l N) ~ J; olilL I T.Hardness (mg/l CaC03) C.O.D. (mgm .. JJ III Nitrites + ( ~ rJl j ) T. Alkalinity (mgll Cac~ T. Solids (mg/l) .180.C 1 U II Nitrates (mall N) - MBAS (mg/l) V n I Ca Hardness (mgll CaC03) D. Solids (mglll-180.C J 1 J pH t, 0 Mg Hardness/mgA CaC03) S. Solids (mg/l)-180.C III Spec. Cond. (p .; S . L].I I I ..mhos/em Free CO2 (Nomagraph) B.O.D. (mg/l) ~ i- e fJs U1M Chlorides (mg/l CIl l T ~ -- Turbidity (Units) Sulfates (mg/l S04) ~ d Color (Units) Sz-- 1~~1 Iron (mg/l Fel .... ::: b J ~ Cadmium '-II Cdl ~ , ~ t b ~ ------- J J~fl Manganese (mg/l Mnl <t:- O Silver (mgll Ag) Copper (mg/l Cui ..:: r b , 0 Lead (oasII Pb) [..." ::: } () 1 ] II Zinc (mg/l Zn) ..:: t 0 ,., Hexavalent Chromium (moll) Sodium (mg/l NI) B re, ~ Cyanide (mgll CN) Nitrites (mg/l N) Fluoride (mgll F) I I DIRECTOR CuI JI. ..f.1u.u Form No. PHL-l 18-308 . . '- - - -- - --- JUL 2 21~~:2 ,. I, -, r.ec'd j~ Lab -- ~ ,,, Publ i c ''':cter Private Water Ot her Date Completed .r ~ ~ ~ ~~ ().. r- ~ -. F ~ e 1 C r~ C a (51) Date Time Col. By =~_;'.-I~.~,-~ '."'"l "'" r. <-L. J ,....:.-:......-;.u.,.- n..'\ , ,I'-bln.- ,," v /, ..~ ,( .. f". {Vf (3 ) (4 ) (8) SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL LEGAL INVESTIGATIONS & FORENSIC SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY /1 ,PESTICIDE ANALYSIS QI WATER ;J':Xcr-.J l~ Lest !icme S;t"I+I.;-r:. Ci+ O",d--€r r~cfs (2) First kell Street No. (9) Street No,'-r~ {ZIJ-er (2.J , ., ,I " ., Commu n ity '(- , (J(l-€'-Vl\ I Sampling Point (223) Aldicarb <\ I ( 78) Nitrate .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (425 ) Aldicarb Sulfoxide . . . I I (426) Aldicarb Sulfone ........ .. b I ( 224) Carbofuran ~ . I I .................. s. ( 427) 3-Hydroxycarbofuran <{ I . . (428) o x a my 1 ........................... .. <, I (429) Carbaryl ........................ .. <"1 I ( 430) Met horny 1 ........................ .. ..:::::/ I . (431) i~etham ............................ .. I .' . . . R e C 'c i n Lab J U L 2 2 E: (;2. -~~--- .-- Pub1 i C >:cter P r i vat e Wa t e r ---T--- - - Ot her Date Completed Ih.~:h- Knl"V(' _ C: t ~\ 0.. p - -: ~ 7- =~ ~ \ rield No. .'-- (51) Date "'::/1.1/('-" Ti me rn"i1 Col. By !.:-?,--!o .7l. t SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL LEGAL INVESTIGATIONS & FORENSIC SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY PESTICIDE ANALYSIS OF WATER 1l-(i' >...J ,t'i. I ':J v~ , " \ " _ C. .1l.1 - ~\G.rile--,e. h '--::- rs.. (3 ) (4 ) (8 ) Street No. (\-1 O'l~:;\;:.r~'Y'd5 (2) First lr~eli:\45 (9) Street ~fA\covJ Q\~e' Q..d n\l~"/\ T I Samp1 i n9 Poi nt last Community Mailing Address (20) Pub Ncom L Priv I (14 ) District ( 1 5) Di stance to Farm ft. I (13 ) Section (30 ) !~a p Coordinates LfE I t;. I Ie." ! (16 ) Block (31 ) He 11 De pt h ft. I (17) Lot (57) Resample? Yes Key ~ No I (1 ) Dat a Base No. COMPOUND PPB I MG/L (223) < I A1dicarb ........................ .. I ( 78) Nitrate .................... .. ( 425) Aldicarb Sulfoxide .. . ?3, I (426) A1dicarb Sulfone ........ .. lCo I ( 224) Ca rbofuran - I~ I ................. .. (427) 3-Hydroxycarbofuran "- I I . . (428) o x a my 1 c I I ............................ .. -- (429) Carbaryl </ I ........................ .. (430) l1ethomyl < I .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. (431 ) j'ietham ............................ .. I .' . . I ! 2 3} 2:, , " '7 ""c'd in Lab JUL 2L ;:~,- 8 ~ubl i c h'G~er P r i v c ~ e We ~ e r ---- ~/ --- -~~--- ~-~--_._- Ot her Date Completed . Lab r; o. P - Field No. (51) Date Time Col. By - ,': /2-3 (i.~ ~~..,~- .:.., (-<-. fr.... fi.- ,111 It'- R H t;. J..! IJI" (3 ) (4 ) (8) SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL LEGAL INVESTIGATIONS & FORENSIC SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY /./ ,PESTICIDE ANALYSIS Qi ,liATER /-rU rC rJ I r~ Last Nwe ,Sl:;;'..;l!,:(~ c.f D,.:s,~( ~d5 (2) Fi rst . Street No. (9) Street ;l{)/rvrJ IZtJ.e,' nL i'J~11 7i '& f!J Community (i('; 'l 'M J- ./ 1 "L- I I / Sampling Point t"ailing Address (20) Pub Ncom -/ Priv / (14 ) District (15 ) Di stance to Farm I ft. / (13 ) Section (30) Map Coordinates :Uy / ~ / /I.c I (16 ) Bloc k --L~ -=-- (31 ) \~ e 11 De pt h ft. / (17) Lot ----~_._---- (57) Resample? Yes ~~ No / (1 ) Oat a Base No. -----._--. ~-- COMPOUND PPB / MG/L (223) Al di carb .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. <(I / ( 78) Nitrate .................... .. ( 425) Al di carb Sulfoxide . . . "2- I / (426 ) Aldicarb Sul fone ...... .. I~ / i' - 9 (224 ) Ca rbofuran -. .-......... / (427 ) 3-Hydroxycarbofuran <I / . . (428) o x a my 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. <' / (429) Carbaryl ...................... .. <' / ( 430) I"ethoniyl C ; / ...................... .. (431) I"etham /'"' / ............................ .. --- . . Rec'd in Lab W~ l ~19t2 Public Water Private Water Ot her Date Completed 5-11-}~ ~\-I-P' ~, / Lab No. P- ~\d()1 t Field No. ~,', ( 51) D ate '>p. " Time Col. By t:.,l 'il r:i ;,- " SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF MEDICAL LEGAL INVESTIGATIONS & FORENSIC SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY PESTICIDE ANALYSIS OF WATER (3) Last Name Hn,c I. 'I~ ( ->vl-: PI \, (4) St reet No. I. I -:H ~- (9 ) St reet ....L ~ (8) Community (-I,'IE ,- I (2) First We..ll ""5 I. " /'-nl,I,'. ,; I'" 1- 1"[_ Mailing Address (20 ) Pub Ncom Priv 1 Sampling Point -// - ~ L /-'/ /-" (15 ) Distance to Farm / ft. 1 Remarks: (3D) 3)1 . , Map Coordinates t I~ 1 - - (31 ) Well Depth - .. ft. 1 COMPOUND PPB 1 MG/L (223) Ald;carb ............. ~ 1 (78) Nitrate ........... (425) Aldicarb Sulfoxide . . . .;1~ ~~~ -, ?:o - - ~ - (426) Aldicarb Sulfone . . . . . \L. (224) Carbofuran . . . . . . . . . . . \ \ ~S II (427) 3-Hydroxycarbofuran . . c::.\ (428) Oxamyl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <\ 1 (429) Ca rbaryl . . . . . . . . . . . . . < \ 1 (430) Methomyl . . . . . . . . . . . . . c::.\ 1 (431 ) Metham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1 . . Lab No. 30-'-(07 Field No. ~ of Date: ' .'~- -IT Time: > "" p~ Col. By: . S"C'f F ~ "n; (Name not initials) Name Location Point of Collection Remarks: . . \ Date Received in Lab 3,0 1 /f'2.. Public Water Private Water Other 77: IT t..Je7t Date Completed Examined By (1:~ \: SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER WELL. ~l/ ~K.()~ lr~ Suu "])tv. r o 7</c-,lJT -::Po M.-p -< 0 olflT ~c::: Il~l'~'1)J ~O/ 's9 J1~ ~5 J~I, - --'-" I J'r;D'5~ (OJ ....~~ I~ 7 ALSO ';)1:, "5J S~ C& I I I Partial ~ Free Ammonia (mg/l N) Nitrites + Nitrates lmall Nt MBAS lmg/l) pH Spec. Condo 4mhos/cm Chlorides lmgll CII - " Sulfates (mg/l S04) Iron lmg/l Fe) I Manganese (mg/l Mn) Copper (mg/l Cu) Zinc (mg/l Zn) Sodium (mgll Na) I Nitrites lmgll N) i Form No_ PH l-l Resample 0 Complete 0 T_Hardness lmg/l CaC03) 1111J T. Solids (mg/l) " 180' C 11111 D. Solids (mg/ll-180'clTll~ I S. Solids (mg/ll"180' C 11111 IT UW~ ~::M J C.O.D. (mg/ll T. Alkalinity (mgll CaCO;J Ca Hardness (mgll CaC03) Mg Hardness(mgJI CaC03) I. B.O.D. (mg/l) Free CO2 (Nomagraph) Turbidity (Units) Ik ~IOr (Units) s~ Cadmium lm!r/l Cd) ~ l" "').. SilvOl' (mgll Ag) lead (mg/! Pb) L- /10 Hexavalent Chromium (maM Cyanide lmgll CN) 1 III II Fluoride (mgll F) DIRECTOR L..u-< ~ ~ 18-308 , I{o \ . Date Received in Lab 3/> 0. Public Water Private Water , Other -,e."tye,J ~ Date Completed Examined By 19.~ . Lab No, 3d) 'i~0 Field No, r I Y Date:': .3 - 2.;$ - i"'Z. Time: .~ J>~ . Col. Bt: ", S~F iln{ , . '(Name not initials) i.l SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTM~NT OF HEALTH SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY CHEMICAL EXAMINATION OF WATER WeLL #-~ ~r H-n~ot.l 'T~ SlIBbIV. Name District Location ORIErJT Point of Collection ~ e LC.. 779P Remarks: III S 0 4-Jf Se Cel t rk I Partial l):r Complete 0 Resample 0 Free Ammonia (mg/l N) c.- O 0 I T.Hardness (mg/l CaC03) C.O.D. (mglll II Nitrites + 3' ,J T. Alkalinity (mg/l CaC0:3 T. Solids (mg/l)- 180' C I ul Nitrates (mo/l N) II MBAS (mg/l) .1/ r;/ Ca Hardness (mg/l CaC03) D. Solids (mglll- 180' C I I pH ..- Mg Hardnesslmg/l Cac031 S. Solids (mg/ll-180" C 1 I I I I .') J Spec. Cond. If I 1 . ...,mhos/cm 0 Free CO2 (Nomagraph) B.O.D. (mg/l) Chlorides (mg/l CIl J- Cf Turbidity (Units) As c I~~ Sulfates (mg/l SO 4' 9 I Color (Units). .' - -.~ .~ Sp ~ '" J~ -- - Iron (mg/l Fe) (It / Cadmium lmg/l Cd) I..: ' ). Tl Manganese lmg/l Mn) 1< D () ls - Silver (mg/l Ag) - f1 Copper (mg/l Cui <D I lead Img,II Pb) I::::: . f) J]] I I Zinc (mg/l Znl k' p l~ Hexavalent I I Chromium {molll Sodium (mg/l Na) I... Cyanide lmg/I CN) 1 I 7- I Nitrites (mg/l N) Fluoride (mg/l F) 1 DIRECTOR Cui J.J. .J.f.v- Form No. PHl-l 18-308 . . T D Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 5, 19.84 Mr. Thomas Samuels 89 Haywaters Drive Nassau Point Cutchogue, NYl1935 Re: Minor subdivisionbcated at Orient Dear Mr. Samuels: The Planning Board reviewed the file for the above mentioned subdivision at the regular meeting of June 4, 1984. The Planning Board requests that a topographic survey be submitted indicating the mean high water , wetlands area, actual location of the dike, and elevations at I' intervals. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR., CHAIRMAN ~OUTHOLD TpWN PLANNING BOARD ~ ~~ \I\L d,.J"1...6 By Diane M. Schultze,seb~tary June . 4, 1984 -, --- I IJV~; 1-- r( L ~,'B4 . An Open Letter to the Members of the gouthold Town Planning loard: Dear lirs: Tor several weeks I have ~een distur~ed by the destruction of the grasses and ~ushes growin~ at the edge of Ielloc~ lav at t~e end ~f Narrow River Road. Trom the natllre 'f this !':ro'^'th I had thought that most of this land was protected \-cetland. Now I am amazed to le~rn t'lllt the owner wishes te Ituild two houees'n this "ronertv. Everyone who loves and "ses Iallock iav, for boating, swimmin~ and allove all for shellfishi.ng must view this pronosal with great concern. The dan"er posed to this nriceless and so far unpolluted 'eodv of water lly any houses so near the water is obvious. It would Ite disastrous if sentic tanks wereo,llowed to endan~er this valua~le resource, in the unliJt.elv event that potaltle water is availa.le. lallock Jay is not only unnolluted and a. valllaltle source of shellfish. it is also beautiful and unsnoiled. It is one of the major attractions of Orient, and I would ccnsider the ouality of mv own life here ironaired if private houses were Il110wed to mar this area, which should be left un- touched for all to enjoy. I urg~~ou to consider these cntllngibles as well as the very real threat of pollution in ruling on this most unfortunate proposal. S;ncerely yours, ~M~~'~'f.')~ Anne lI. lopkins "lett Road Orient . . . ~~6J;\DE.L--S \ --\ l) t-.:IIS: e.4 J~A.J.Oe- !-i1C;i1GS, CC!>I-iGeI2.>.f SH0u<....o g,,,,, '17-+~ SANI r-Aei SiSTEf/^- - --- II-Ie-- POll..]! IS eL61/.:3. "f';;ot-rc;>IIl OF f?eo (,0(')UL-D P.::,e- /2.Le:.Y. 4:1: (}Jl-(IClA i 5 aP-:>...J~c..-nOl-.iAe.L~ ~AUS"'" OF -;t:U::ODI'iJ9 I r;eAINI14(;;;/5eeP4tj~ ~C- IlJ 1V -n-llaO ~y P;1t.-DIIVtj ~ IN wr '2-" 18c::o cP~ .~OD IiAIN ~v. 10 .- (~11-\~ ~ 1^1~\It\U{^- \~ ? <f'U=e- ~. ~ \' . pg (l 0 ) . 5/21/84 WHEREAS, on the 6th day of February, 1984, this Board adopted a resolution wherein it accepted the report of inspector John W. Davis, designated Report No. 340, with respect to the minor subdivision of James Manos at Mattituck, and, WHEREAS, as adopted, said resolution is unclear as to what portions of the report constitute requirements and which are recommendations which need not be acted upon by the applicant, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the raod report of Inspector John W. Davis, dated January 7, 1984 with respect to the subdivision of James Manos, designated as Report No. 340, be accepted and, based upon such report and all other submissions to this Board in connection with the above-referenced minor subdivision, this Board determines follows: . ( as 1. That the applicant, in constructing the access road or right-of-way to Lot 4 as shown on said subdivision plan, be required to proceed in accord withthe recommendations numbered. 1 through 6 of said report. ( ' 2. The applicant, James Manos, however, may, subject to approval of thisBoard, use alternate materials in the construction of said raodway; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED that when construction, such roadway or right-of-way may be used as access to Lots 2 and 3, as well as Lot 4 as shown on said subdivision plan; and be it ( FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant not be required to construct a berm on the south property line of Lot 2 or on the west property line of Lot 4. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward * * * ( - On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RSOLVED that the Southcld Town Planning Board amend condition number 6 in the resolution of conditional approval dated May 7, . 1984 to read as follows: The riqht-of-wav shall be offered for dedication as a Town Road; in the minor subdivision of Robert and Jean Lenzner located at Mattituck. '~:. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, War * * * Samuels minor subdivision located at Orient. The Board again reviewed this proposal and noted that the Town is considering pruchasing this property, however, Mr. Samuels will not make a donation to the Town. It was also noted that the Town owns land 50' away from the property. The Planning Board will hold this application until a decision is reached by the Town Board regarding the purchase of this land. c * * * n . . MAY 211984 JAMES H.RAMBO.lle. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y. 11968 PHONE: (516) 283-1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 734.5858 May 16, 1984 Southold Town Planning Board 8ennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Hall Southold, New York Attn: Bennett Orlowski Re: Narrow River Road Property Dear Mr. Orlowski, It has been ten days since the original hearing on the referenced matter. Since there is no apparent interest in the Town's acquisition of the property, I must insist that the Board's consideration of this application continue. Please schedule the hearings in a timely manner. Sincerely, ~. Thomas E. Samuels ~~ . . t1AY 9 1984 JAMES H.RAMBO.IIC. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y. 11968 PHONE: (516) 283-1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 734-5858 May 8, 1984 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision Narrow River Road, Orient, NY Gentlemen: Allow me to thank you for your courteous attention to the referenced application of last evening. Having dealt with properties of this nature for many years (not, I might add, as principal), I am only too aware of their problems. That such problems become minor given their value is a fact of which you are aware. I would like to state the following: 1. The potential water use on the property is less than 10% of the potential use, if farmed. 2. The elimination of contaminants coincidental with farming is an asset to the Orient water table, (i.e., aquifer), 3. The distance from the MHW mark of the sanitary systems will result in total safety to Hallock's Creek (Bay) from bacterial and chemical contaminants. 4. The water quality on-site is equal to Orient's water quality, i.e., Temik and higher than average saline levels (but still acceptable to Suffolk County standards which, I might add, are equal or exceed Federal standards). 5. The subdivision meets Town Zoning requirements. 6. Substantial man-made structures between the wetlands and upland (building areas) predating the adoption of the N. Y. S. D. E. C. regulations should and will eliminate the jurisdiction of that agency as to the buildings. The structures will, however, conform to such regulations. (con' t. ) f0f1UL ",0 ,A\. :...,\ ~-' ~~ n . . JAMES H.BAMBO,IIe. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N, y, 11968 PHONE: (516) 283-1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHDGUE, N, y, 11935 PHONE: (516) 734.5858 May 8, 1984 Page 2 (con' t. ) All of the above were considered prior to my purchase of the property since all structures will conform to Federal Flood Hazard requirements, I find the statement that the Board should protect the public particularly objectionable and condescending. The implication must be taken, that my intent would be to defraud or misrepresent the property to a prospective buyer. The Board must be aware of its connotation. The prospective purchase of part of the property is, I believe, meant to placate a small group of our Town's people. I am philosophically opposed to purchase of small parcels which are not environmentally fragile. The cost of such pur- chases are excessive, generally, given the size of the parcel. I would rather, as a citizen of Southold, see the purchase of truly fragile land in Orient (Pete's Neck, Gide Island, or West Creek in New Suffolk). However, I remain open to the Town's approach in this proposed purchase. The fact that the Town recently purchased the Demarest Boat Ramp in the area also might affect such a purchase. I do not believe that we can realistically expect this to occur. Therefore, I expect that the Planning Board will continue its deliberations on the subdivision of the property and not delay its deliberations overlong. This is a leqal subdivision and I trust I will be fairly and justly treated. To quote Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: "We are in danger of forgetting that a strong public desire to improve the public condition is not enough to warrant achieving the desire by a shorter cut than the constitutional way of paying for the change" . Most sincerely, cc: Frank Murphy, Supervisor Planning Board ~ Page 9 ~ May 7, 1984 qS ( Lenzner subdivision cont. 7. The water quality on the subject premises at the time of the last sampling exceeded the drinking water standards established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and treatment may be required on individual wells on the subject premises. .8. The above conditions (1-7 inclusive) shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval of this subdivision. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski,Mullen, Latham, Ward, Wall * * * Horton chanqe of zone located at Cutchoque-The Board will make a field inspection prior to making recommendation to the Town Board on this proposal. * * * ( On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the final maps of Constantine Georqiopolous to the necessary state and local aqencies. The Southold Town Planning Board will set Monda~, May 21,1984 at 7:30 p.m. at the Southold Twn Hall as the t1me and plac~ for a public hearinq on the question of approval of the f1nal maps of the maior subdivision of Constantine Georqioupoulus located at Southold. Vote of the Board: Orlowski, MUllen, Latham, Wall, W rd '", * * * l Mr. Thomas S~m';1els was oresent to dj"~l1"" hi" proposal for a minor subd~vlsion ]o~~tpn ~t Oriprit. He made his appointment at the Board s request. It was noted-that the Planning Board has made several field _inspectiorB of this property,.,and they:"", questioned the -dike which was indicifted on the survey ,and :the topography'of the'Sland. The Board also questioned the availability of potable water on the site. Mr. Samuels stated that the water acceptability would be determined by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The Pl~nning Board questioned if Mr. Samuels would consider selling one lot to the Town, Mr Samuels stated he had no objection; to thfs but wondered if the Town had funds for this purchase, he added that he would not donate but would be open to discussing this possibility with the Town. Mr. Orlowski stated that presently the Board does not , look favorably on this subdivision. It was noted that the Board // will make another f..ield i.nspection in order to familirize the / ew Board member and Town Planner with the subdivision. . . * * * , , ( ( L . ( 4/9/84 q1 pg (9) On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Wall it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an extension of 90 days on the action of the maps of the minor subdivision of Robert and Jean Lenzner located at Mattituck pursuant to the request of the applicants attorney. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen,Latham, Orlowski, Wall * * * * * * * * * * ON a motion made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Mullen it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, May 7, 1984 at 7:30 p.m at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road Southold as the time and place for the next regular meeting of the Southold TownPlanning Board. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen,Latham, Orlows * * * * * * * * * * On a motion made by Mr. Wall, seconded by Mr. Latham it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board amend the minutes of January 9 , 1984 to read as follows: "RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board does not grant sketch approval of the minor subdivision of Dr. Thomas Samuels at this t.ime as the Board requests more time to ~Vie:o::eOfr:h:S::~~d:AYes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham, Orlowski, Wall * * * * * * * * * * On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Latham it wa RESOLVED that the Southold Town PlanningBoard amend the minutes of the March 30, 1984 meeting to read as follows: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board has no obiection to the layout of the proposed subdivision of Blair, locatea at East Marion however, sketch approval cannot be granted due to the insufficient area of the lots (100-31) Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Latham,Orlowski, Wall * * * * * * f.* * * * Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman left the room at this time and the Chair was turned over to Board member Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mr. Raynor waited in the hallway as he cannot participate in the discussion of Seacroft. ********** Mr.Richard Cron, esq. was present for a presubmission conference before the Board to discuss the site plan of seacroft,located at Cutchogue. Mr. Orlowski briefly explained that the Town Board had recently granted a change of zone for this proposal from A-residential to multiple. . . FEB 14 1984 NEt,: YORK STATE DEPARmE~!T OF EfWIRO'l,llEmAL CONSERVATIO',! Regulatory Affairs Unit Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 Henry G. Hilliarns COI!Il11ss i oner NO PER11IT NECESSARY - TIDAL WmAr~DS ACT ThOrnA~ k. <;' ~>Q.l~ ~ br......r-'1 ~I 199~ JAhe~ It Ktt.....Q,o...L~c. a I:'\..OP::' I-A.-e. SOv.u.\A-....p+ON,~<,'" ~D~K.. II'-ib&' Re: ?~rc~l lo(.~W OR:eJt- T~'( ~Af> lcrool 02.7, 2. , '3 Dear UR-. ~ A'l'nv.Js I A review has been made of .your Dro~osal to: r-emOve it.~I~4-.~.s ~e")c~1 pla.-.I+ ~rA"'s. so,.\-...ble ~r ~"^"l,IN~ o~ kors~ CtNc!R.~""ooJe cONcr~4-~ wood,l~oN debf';~ C..,tr~N4-I't c:>ol1O;t-e. 11-11 w~~~ w; U be CONJ.,C-~J 1~ 1-1... <<.d.jc..cerJ~"-("A +0 i;.,d....1 w~+IQ."'cko...d eWf>i-..J::; +OfOfJP-...pI-'1 w'~1 Lo~tt~~n ~'~J,.,...b..(l ,uc-e p+ +Or- flQ.rJ"'-I\l~ ..f. a /2./tSs. .' Orc.h",~J S-ke.~T ,NM2b1..l 'e,o)elL RO~, t-l",\loc.K... ~~ I C)rL~r 'T;....ol G~ s",,)tQ.~\J. Co,)..I~ or s<>c~u~. I It has been determined that no permit is necessary under Article 25 (Tidal Wetlands). However, any additional work or modifications to the project may require a permit. It is you~ responsibility to notify this office in writing if such additional work or modifications are contemplated. Assuming you have obtained any other applicable permits, you may proceed with your project. Very truly yours, J ~l.~ -'uR. Oaniel J. Larkin Reginal Permit Administrator l)JL: R~!T: 11 ,- 'V> t~/b~ ';t''\ . . fEB \I:G 1984 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVIO HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER Date February 1, 1984 To Henry E. Raynor, Jr. Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 RE: Thomas Samuels Development Orient (T) Southold Dear Mr. Raynor: We are in receipt of your letter dated January 23, 1984 the above referenced project. concerning !- .y_ui 1. This Department has no objection to your designation of lead agency status. 2. This De~ar1ment is in agreement with your initial determination. '--J\-l ~.. . 1 -----1 3. This Department does not agree with your initial determination. See Commen ts. )----1 4. Insufficient information is available for technical comments. i:---__~i 5. There is no record of an application to this Department. i_____-, A more accurate project location is needed. (Suffolk County Tax Map #) 1:---- Test well data is needed. I-:-.=~--:' Test hole data is needed. 1- Other: L_X -I 6. This Department has received an application and it is: Complete X Incomplete COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAO.N.'r'.11901 Other 548-3318 1__ _~l 7. r"'ppears that the project can b~erved by: Sewage Disposal System , Sewer System and Treatment Works ,~==~~ Subsurface Sewage Disposal System(s) --l _" Other: Water Supply System '~__ A Public ~Iater Supply System ;~ Individual Water Supply System(s) i=::i Other: 8. Approval of other Agencies may be required: '~ Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) . ~ Town or Village Other: --, 1- X:=i 9. Comments: Water supply may be limited. Thank you for coordinating with this Department and if you have any questions please contact the undersigned. Name Phone Roval R. Reynolds. P.E. 548-3318 . .B0219B~ ~ ~ New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40 State University of New York Stony Brook, New York 11794 (516)751-7900 Henry G. Williams Commissioner January 30, 1984 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Southo1d Town Planning Board Southo1d Town Hall Main Road Southo1d, New York 11971 Re: Subdivision of Thomas Samuels - Orient Dear Mr. Raynor: We have reviewed the above project and have no objection to your agency being lead agency. We agree with your determination of non- significance because of the scope of the project. We are concerned with the following items: 1. The survey should clearly show the tidal wetlands on and adjacent to the project site. 2. That all construction should occur a minimum of 75' landward of the tidal wetland boundary. 3. That the sanitary system be located a minimum of 100' landward of the tidal wetland boundary. 4. The quantity and type of fill to be utilized to develop parcels. This project will also require approval from this office pursuant to Part 661 Tidal Wetland Land Use Regulations. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. Very truly yours1 ._ ~-r~ Charles T. Hamilton Alternate Regional Permit Administrator CTH:jf . . p T Sonthold, N.Y. 11971 HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr., Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. WILUAM F. MULLEN, Jr. TELEPHONE 765 - 1938 . January 23, 1984 Environmental Analysis Unit DEC, Building 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, New York 11794 Gentlemen: Long Enclosed find a completed l8ho<clIx Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the minor subdivision of Thomas Samuels, located at Orient.' This project is unlisted and an initial determination of non-significance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination in our role as lead agency. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until February 6, 1984. We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Yours truly, . HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD '~4'Wt (--- .~~ ,Gr. By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary dhw enc. CC: Department of Health , erOWN OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART I . JAN 1 q ~,~.""J A r'" -- ,il . I. ~ PROJECT INFORMATION ~OT:CE; ihis document is designed to assist in dete~ini~g whether ~~e action proposed ~ay ~ave ! ~~gnificant !ff!c~ In the !nv;rcnment~ Please comcle~a the -!ntirl! ::la':.1 Sheet. ~nswer1 'eO these .~uestions liil1 Je c:::msiaered ~s oart or t.~e aoplicatian fOl""apQraval and ;nay be' sui:Jjec: to further- '/ertfication lnd ;lublic r!!vhw. Provide any additiortal information you oelieve will ~e needed :0 comolete PARTS 2 and 3. - , ~ ~~ is axaec:ed :~at comale~ion of the SAF will be depande~ ~n information curr!nttv available and ~~11 not 'nv~l v~ new 5tUd:1l!S ". ~e5aan:n. or investiqation. rf fnfo!'"m!tion l""!ouiring such additional '.ark . '1 I i\] tnd1c3ta and soec1ry ~aC:1 Instance. 1S.:unaYil~iilC e. "AME 0F pQOJECi: ~A~E ~NO ADDRESS uF OWNER (If Diff.rent) ~. {~ (Stl"'~t} (;3.'J. } (Stata) 0lE?.?J -/.;JtJf lZip) 3US'!:MESS ?!;QNE; 11735' .,p) 'JeSCRI~i!O~! OF pOOJEC7: (Sr;~fiy describe t,pe of projec~ Jr ac':ion) dM~~ (?l~SE COMPlEJE EACH CUESi,uN - :ndieata N.A. if not .0011c.o1.) , A. Sl:! JESCRIPTIQN (~hy~tc!l 5atting of over111 ~rojec~. ooth develoc~ !na ~ndeYelcced ar~as) 1. General c:taractar or t:1e land: Generally uniform ~looe ~~aneraily uneven and roiling,Jr irre9ular 1.. ?r"'!sent :a~d use: Urban _, [ndustrial.~. C me, !,rF~~~_--.c-~UDurDfn~'t ;(Ul'" I' , For9S'C _, .~gr'tultu... _, Ot.',er Afb1<.e,- !iffiii_ ~ ~ . - I 3. Total acr~aae OT :]roject !roea: 3j1~acres. .' - ~e~dcw or 3rushland ?~sently Aftsr Comolet~on -- - . ~~S-;cr.s 'c~es ~resent1y After ~om~llt1on A~~roximate acreage: ~'Cr!s tad _lC"!S _l'=:-~S Unve~etate1 (~e~. ear-::i 01'" fill) 3.'75-.c,"s "3.2(",C",, _~CMS ':laur Surface ':"~a _J.eres Aqr~C:Jit~r!l _acres lC:"~S ~cads. Juiid~ngs !nd. '1~~er ;)avea 3Ur7!C~S _!c:"'!s _.J.c~es ;~etl and (="'!snwat!~ or 1'fcai .H 'Jer:!,,.~i-:i!s ~4. 25 Jr ~.C.L. ) ,,to ,cr.s _lC:"'='S 'Jt:-:e!" (~lld1 c.a:a :,!Je i lCr!S _iC:"''!S J. ',.jhat: is 1Jl"''!-=cminan~ SQil tY!'l!{S) on .)rojec:t it,;!? Jt!/~, ~. 5. oJ. .I\.n ;:h!!l"'=! jedrock autc:"O:3'pings on :I~jec~ s~ ::a? _Yes L'lo ~. ~hat is de~t~ ';~ :ed~cc~? (!n ':!!l!C} J/ 11 73 -/- -..-.-,---'~-- ---/"~--'". "...~.....,,,;..._-.,,,.,~-,.. <....~-".....~.-'"_..~--,_.....-..-...... . . " . A ' 6. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10% .1.ti!...-%; 10-15: :: 15: or .' - greater _... 1. Is project contiguous ~, or contain a building or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? _Yes ~No What is the depth to the water table? ~feet Dp hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~es' ______No Does project site contain ~r species of plant Or animal life that is identified as threatened or endanqered - _Yes ~lo, according to - Identify each species . . . 8. 9. 10. 11. Are there any unique Or unusual land forms on the proje~ site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - _Yes _No. (Describe ~ . 12. Is the project site pr~ently us~ by the community or neighborhood as an open space Or recreation area - _Yes ~o. . Does the present site offer or include scenic views Or vistas known to be important to .the cOlllllunity? --!L-Yes -'10 13. 14. Streams within Or contiguous to project area: a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary ~~' 15. Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within Or contiguous to project area: a. Name : b. Size (in acres) 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g~ single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). ~ ~ 8. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) ;0,'75'" a. Total contiguous acreage own~ by project sponsor Project acreage developed: -1L.. acres initially: .JL acres e.&At.~. acres. ultimately. b. c. Project aCreage to remain undeveloped d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot- age ; developed acreage {J ; proposed (upon completion of project) f. Number of off-stroot parking spaces existing g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One 'Fami ly Initial 2- Ultimate ~ Multiple Family Condominium Two Family 1. If: Orientation Neighborhood-City-Regional Estimated Employment Conmerci a 1 Industri a 1 j. Total height of tallest proposed structure ~ 5"? feet. J../ t<-V1l S~ . ilia ~ ~ ~ f-hO~ IvtS,- -2- . . . . 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site - ~ tons cubic yards. 3. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site - 1/2- acres. 4. Will any mature forest)over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? _Yes ~~o 5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? ~Yes ______No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ;' months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipated _____No. b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 _month -----year (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date final phase mnth ----year. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phasas? ~Yes ______No 8. Will blasting occur during constrJction? _Yes ~NO 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction L; after project is complete _' 10. Number of Jobs eliminated by this project ~. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? _yes ~No. If yes, explain: 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes _No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) ~""~1..,,;::t:u1 ga.tu.l~ ~ c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, p~s, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? _yes ~No. . Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? VYes _No 14. 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid weste? _yes ~No b. If yes. will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? _Yes _No c. If yes, give name: ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? -L-..-Yes _No 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? _Yes ~o 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? _Yes ~NO 18. 19. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? _yes ~No Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~ Ves _No. If yes. indicate type(s) +/~ ~/~~ If water supply is from wells indicate pumping capacity 30-60 9a1s/minute.r~ Total anticipated water usage per day _ qoC:/~ay. Zoning: a. What is dcminant 'zoning classification of site? 20. 21. 22. (/2"2 ~-2 b. Current s~ec1f;c zoning classification of site c.. Is proposed use consistent with present zoning? ~ . d. If no, indicate desired zoning -3- . 26. Approvals: . . a. Is any Federal permit reG.ired? _____yes ~o b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? ______yes c. Local and Regional approvals: City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Soard City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other local agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS TITLE: REPRESENTING: DATE: Approval Required (Yes, No) (Type) f.' ~FrnM1J ~ D '" e !'!VAnlAAr. -4- ~o Submittal Approval (Date) (Date) , 'rJ Il/hl>J _ , , Attach any additional information as ~ay be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the' proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid them. PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: _~ =ifI . . '. , . .TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . .. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART II PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE General Infor~ation (Read Carefully) . In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to ~e an expert anvironmental analyst. . _ Identifying tnat an effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it sionificant. Any large effect must be evaluated i" ?ART 3 to determine significance. effect in column 2 si~~ly asks that it be looked at rurther. _ The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the threshold of magnltude that would trigger a response in colu,"" 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific ~roject or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Iapact rating. is also necessarily By identifying an _ Each project, on each site, in each ~ocality, will vary. TIlerefore, the examples have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. _ The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer ~ if there will be ~ effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as ~ answers. c. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the aporooriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is 1~1er than examole, check column 1: d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact ellea.consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. - . .. e. If a potentially large magnitude, place a Yes impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less tnan large in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. 1. 2. 3 IMPACT ON LAND 00 . . S~ALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE MODERATE LARGE REOUCJ;:O BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1. WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHA~:GE TO PROJECT SITE? Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15~ or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed lO~. Construction on Land where the depth to the water tabla is less than 3 feet. Construction of oaved parking aree for 1,000 or ~cre vehicles. Censtruction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one rhase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove oore than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e. rock or Soil) per year. Construction of any new sanitary landfill. .5- . . Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: NO Y WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL LAND FDRHS C"XiO FOUND' 011 THE SITE? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, geological forma- ~, t>ons, etc.) _ Specific land forms: 2. II1PACT ON WATER 3. NO Y WILL PROJEcr AFFECT AllY WATER BODY DESIGNATED AS ........../7"x 0 PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Envir- ~ onmental Conservation Law, E.C.L.) Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: 4. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY rION-PROTECTED EXISTING OR NEW 110 Y BODY OF HATER? ....... .., ..... .... ........................ '(9"0 Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 A 10S increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: 5. WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER qUAUTI? Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will require a discharge permit. NO Y (10 Project requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed project. Project requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or ooeration cau5ing any contamination of a public water supply system. Project will adversely 'affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Project reQuiring a facility that would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Project will likely cause siltation or other dischaege - into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obviaus visual contrast to natural conditions. -f.. - I. ~ oJ - . . ~l^LL TO POTE:IT lAL eMI r::PACT ,3E 0DERATE L.ARGE REDUCED BY HIP ACT mPACT PPOJECT CHAnGE - - - - - - ES - - - . - - - : - - - - . ES - - - - - - - - - - - - ES . . - - - " - - - - - - ES - - - - - - - - - - - - : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , " . ___ ather Impacts: 6. ~~~~F~~O~~~:. ~~ ::~. ~~:~~~~. ~::I: .~~:~:-:I~.:~, ~~~~~~~. ~~::~ ~O Examole that Would Aoply to Column 2 . . , Project would imoede flood water flows. Project is likely ~o cause substantial erosion. Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. . ather impacts: IMPACT ON M~ NO YES 7. WILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY?... "......................0'0 Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. I Project will re,ult in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a hoat source producing w~re than 10 million 6TU's per hour. Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLMITS MID ~'W'ALS 6. WILL PROJECT AFF~CT ~~Y THREATENED OR EMDANGERED SPECIES, NO YES (0"0 Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the ,:ew York or Federal list~ using the s;te~ over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wild- Tire !tat.; tat.. . Application of Pesticide or herbicide over more than twice a year other t~3n for agri~~!tural purco5=s. Ot~er 1mpacts: g. WILL PROJECT SU8ST,\:ITIALL Y AFFECT !!Otl- THREATErlED OR ~1O YES ENDANGERED SPECiES? .......................................00 Examole that Would Apply to Column 2 Project would sub,tantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish or wildlife spec;e~. Project r~cuires the removal of ~ore than 10 J~res of mature forest (o'ler lOa years in age) or other locally i~p~rtant vegetat~on. -7- 2.. 3. IlA 0 POTENTIAL CArl IIIPACT BE .IODERATE LARGE REOUCED OY IMPACT WP.ACT PROJ ECT CHArlGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _. - - - - - - - - . . I~PACT O~ VISUAL RESOURCE 10.. IIILL THE PROJECT AFFECT VrEflS, VISTAS OR rrlE VISUAL CHARACTER OF THE iIEIGHBlJR~OOO OR COM~UNITY? .............. NO 00 Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 An incompatible visual affect caused by the introduction of new materials, colors and/or forms in contrast to the surrounding landscape. A project easily visible, not easily screened,that is obviously different from others around it. Project will result in the elimination or major screening of scenic views or vistas known to be important to the area. Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCES 11. WILL PROJECT IMPACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, NO PRE-HISTORIC OR PALEONTOGICAL IMPORTANCE? .................~ Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project occurino wholly or partially within or contiguous to anY facility or site listed on the National Register of - historic places. Any impact to an archeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Other impacts: I!>IPACT ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATION 12. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE QUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING NO Y OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU~ IT! ES? . .. . .. ~O Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: IMP~CT or! TRANSPORTATlml 13. WILL THERE BE All EFFECT TO EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEJAS? . . ., .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Project will result in severe traffic problems. Other impacts: __ - J"- . - 1. 2.. .' :;. . ~"ALL TO POTENTIAL CMi UlPACT .BE .OOERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CfW1GE - YES - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - YES - - - . - - - - ! - - - - - - ES - - - - - - - - - - - - ES - - - - - - - - - __ _ L____ -- - - - -- . . , = . '. . NO Y 00 ...........----;;:---- ",..;..... - ~~..,.c..,_'-'.__' [~PACT O~I GRl)~-!TH A~D CH.~PJlCTF'R 'm~:u:mv OR m:rm!~:1?H~C~ DOER/IE --lARGE- - REOuCEOSY- H'D"CT U1PACT PROJECT C~.I'r1GE .' . 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHARACTEq of THE EXISTING NO YES CO~lIlUNITV? ................................................00 Examole that ~ould Apoly to Column 2 The population of the City, Town or Village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5~ of resident human population. The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera- ting services will increase by more than S~ per year as a result of this project. .-- . , ; Will involve any permanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove prime agricultural lands from cul tivation. . c The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Oevelopment will induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future projects. Project will relocate 15 or more employees in one or more businesses. .- - Other impacts: 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? NO YES ...... 'GO Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Either government or citizens of adjacent communities have expressed opposition or rejected the project or have not been contacted. Objections to the project from within the community. IF M1Y ACTIOII IN P.~RT 2 IS lOEtlTIFIEO AS A POTENTIAL LARGE I~PACT OR IF YOU C~tl:iOT DETERl.u1IE THEMAG11lTUDE OF UlPACT. PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF EAF Cm1PLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: DETERMINATION PART I _ PART n _ PART 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1, 2 and 3) end considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: PREPARE A NEGATIVE OECLARATION o . A. The project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant damage to the !nvironmgnt. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there ~ill not be a significant effect in this case because the mitiaation measures described in PART 3 have been included as part40r the proposed project. . c. The project will result in one or more major adverse impacts that cannot be reduced and may causa significant damaqe to the envi ronment. PREPARE A ~VE DECLARATION PREPARE POSITIVE ORATIQ;1 PROCEED ,11TH EIS Date J/7W Signature of Rp.sponsible Official in Lead Agency from ~espons;blc officer) Print or type na~e of responsible official in Lead Agency -10- . . 1 . 2. ~ Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 NO YES ... ..........~<::> SI'ALL TO POTENTIAL CAil I:~PACT'CE.7 r~OER.~ TE LAP.GE REDUCED BY IMPACT HIPACT PROJECT CHANGE - - - .. . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14. I'lPACT ON E~'ERGY WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COft1UNITIES SOURCES OF PJ"L QR NO YES ENERGY SUPPLY? . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . - . . . . . . . . ~ 0 Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 ~" Project causing greater than 5% increase in any form of energy used in municipality. . . Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than SO single or tl'o family residences. Other impacts: IMPACT ON NOISE 15. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONADLE OOORS, NOISE, GLARE, VIa~TION NO YES or elECTRICAL DISTURSANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ....~<::> Examples that Hould Apoly to Column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Project will oroduce operating noise exceedine the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of strJctures. Project will remove natural barriers that would act .s a noise screen. Other il:lPacts: IMP ACT Or! HEALTH & Mo' ZA RDS 16. HILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTri AND SAFETY? . Project will cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" (i.e. toxic. poisonous, highly reactive, radioac~ive. irritating, infectious, etc. ,inc1udinr;z wastes that are solid, se..~i..solid. liquid or contain gases.) Storaoe facilities for one million or more gallons of 1iquified netura1 gas or other liouids. Other imoects: . .? . .-....--\", '. . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . .. " - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS HIFORMATlOil _ Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially large. _ The amount of writing necessary to answer Part 3 may be determined by answering the Question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of my decisions? .. . J . INSTRUCTIONS Complete the following for each Impact or effect identified in 'Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than large impact by a pro- ject change. 3. Based on the Information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this Impact Is Important to the minlclpal1ty (city, town or village) in which the project is located. To answer the Question of importance, consider: _ The probability of the impact or effect occ"rring . The duration of the impact or effect fl)'. _ Its irreversibility, Including permanently lost resources or val~es _ Whether the impact or effect can be controlled The regional consequence of the Impact or affect _ Its potential divergence from local needs and goals _ Whether known Objections to the project apply to this impact or effect. OETERI'INATION OF SIG1IlFICANCE An action is considered to be significant if: One (or ~ore) impact is determined to both ~ and its (their) consequence, based on the review above, 15 fmoortant. PART III STAT~1ENTS . (Continue on AttaChments, as needed) . - 11- r- . 'JAt; i 9 1~" JAMES H.RAMBO,IIIC. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y. 11968 PHONE: 1516} 283-1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 734.5858 ;/;7;'1 ~/6<<htJ~~ I~~- . t! ~/rt!. !1h.~~ if.~ f)~Y;u. ~) 1~~~1katl~~~~ oIQ)~~~4~~db ~~~91te~.. . ~U~~/ ~ ;th..ep~ ryM-e~ ~~~~~ .' .~Jk., ~ ~ /.). E,fj? f&V.~~e. rl~dMJut;:;# DE,e ~ U ~ ~ &- );>'F..tfl,~a.~ ~/J1Uf~.~Y~d;~k~, ~.~dJ ~~1fc iW'bAur)~ ~rk~~N;Yk ~ ~~ifu;;~~?G#gh' . .:d~ 1M1~rfu.~$~~~ . . JAMESR.HAMBO,I.C. BISHOPS LANE SOUTHAMPTON, N. Y. 11968 PHONE: (516) 283-1254 WUNNEWETA ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11935 PHONE: (516) 734.5858 i~~~;.s~~k~~ ~~.~J;t.e~1/PJ>7( j)~ . ~~t/~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~, ~~ ~~~k~~mekud tAte, eft PE(ff ~ U;~~.~. , . . D southald. N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE 765 - 1938 HENRY E. RAYNOR. Jr. . Chai"'"'" JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI. Jr. GEORGE RlTCHlE LA TRAM. Jr. W1LUAM F. MULLEN. Jr. January 12, 19B4 Thomas Samuels B9 Haywater Drive Nassau point cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Minor Subdivision of Thomas Samuels Located at Orient Dear Mr. samuels: The follwoing action was taken at the southold Town Planning Board meeting, Monday, January 9, 19B4. RESOLVED that the southold Town Planning Board does not grant sketch approval of the Minor subdivision of Thomas Samuels, located at Orient. RESOLVED that the southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency in regard to the state Environmental Quality Review Act for the Minor Subdivision of Thomas samuels, located at Orient. An initial determination of non_significance has been made. upon review of the above mentioned proposal, it is the concensus of the board that more information is required. Please complete the enclosed forms and return them, along with three (3) copies of the above captioned map, to this office so we may begin SEQRA action. If you have any questions, contact this office. Very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze J\ " . t pg. (14) . ~ 4 1/9/84 Thomas Samuels-minor subdivision located at Orient. After an on-site field inspection of the property it was the concensus of the Board that more information will be required in order to process the application. Thomas Samuels be required to file a Long Environmental Assessment Form, in order to review the buildability of the property The Board expressed the possibility that the Town obtain this property. (' . " !~._, '....~., will On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Lathem ~ it was cr' C\ RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board does w\~ _~ not grant seketch approval of the Minor Subdivision ~('l ~ of Thomas Samuels, l'ocated at Orient. lY S':ff:..)v Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, Mullen, Lathem, Orlowski ~,~ $ On I,~ it \ I RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare I itself lead agency in regard to the StateEnvironmental Quality / Review Act for the Minor Subdivision of Thomas Samuels, located / , at Orient'. An initial determination of non-significance has / '\been made. Long Envi~onmental Assessment Form to be filed. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Raynor, MUllen, Lathem, OrlowsWi a motion made by Mr. Mullen, Seconded by Mr. Orlowski was ************************************* ( .. Mr. Mullen suggested that the Board explore the point of law in the Code Book regarding diked property. It was the concensus of the Board to direct a letter to the Town Attorney asking for an explanation of this point of law. - *********************************** The Board received reports from the Town Engineer, Larry Tuthill, regarding Settler's at Oysterponds and Homestead Acres. ************************************** It was noted that as of this meeting a building inspector certification had not been received for Dr. Liezewski. ************************************ Being no further business to come before the Board, Mr. Mullen made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Lathem and carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. ~spectfullY submitted, c:f;),'O-M.-- I\t\ S!.JLu-L-l~ Diane M. SChultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board .e- Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman " .'v . .] ~"'" c \ 1st rtct ~OOO ~r t ion )'700 Lork J?OO )t ::03000 ~:\~~\ .. ~-'''-'\'?-~ ..i,.~' ,: ,,'f;'\~ .!_ ;' \".";/'./ ~ ; \\ 'I.\P . . 1(:"\110,, I'"'''''' 'Y.l3.TV Fom, 8000' ".M-B"8.in..d So]" Deed, w"" Co",'n"", .g.'n" c.'', A"to-J"d'"ido.] ". Con"m"'" ,,,,,,1, ,m CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY, L ~i9409PAGf228 NOT FOR PUBLICATION 2.11,1 ,. , nineteen hundred and Eighty three THIS INDEN11JRE, made the Is t BE1WEEN day of August. LAWR aWE S. INGOLIA, 127 Windmill Lnae, Southampton, New York 11968 party of the first part, and THOMAS SAMUElS, residing at: 89 Haywater Drive, NASSAU POINT party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, Eiece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being ilulJe orient, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the corner formed by the intersection of the easterly side of Narrow River Road with the northerly side of Orchard Street: RUNNING THENCE along the easterly & northeasterly sides of Narrow River Rd. 1. North 15 degrees 44 minutes 40 seconds East, 311,32 feet: and 2. North 39 degrees 12 minutes 30 seconds West, 328.57 feet~ THENCE along land now or formerly of Edwin H. King; 1. North 42 degrees 29 minutes 50 seconds East, 221.79 feet: and 2. North 36 degrees 14 minutes East 80 feet, more or less to the ordinary highwater mark of Hallock's Bay: THENCE 8asterly, Southeasterly and southerly along the ordinary high- water mark of Hallock's Bay, as it winds and turns 975 feet more or less to the northerly'side of Orchard street; and THENCS Westerly along the Northerly side of Orchard Street, 100 feet: more or less, to the corner and point or place of BEG INNING. 8UBJECT to covenants, easements and restrictions of re~ord. SUBJECT to riparian rights and easements of others over Hallock's Bay SUBJECT to the rights of the United States Government, the State of New York, and Town of Southold or other municipal agencies to regulate and control the use of piers, bulkheads and land adjacent to the water. TOGlcTIJ ER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to s.aid premises; TO HAVE AND TO J rOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of rhe first part oos not done or suffered anything whereby the said 'Premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of _" ,the first oart will re<:eive the consi_deration for this___(;QllVey~nce .a.ndwiIJhqldJhe. rJgh--.L!9 receiy~__s~ch.,~~nsi~- I UC'f'\OI\!I Block 0200 Lot 003000 'l5\I'=..\ /~~\~:~~,'; 1?(;~~'~:'~ . ii ..>,:'''-h <~f/~f .,;<", TAX "lAP [)[SlCN.'\ TION Dj,t SCl; Illl l.ot(s) ,,:.." "",. f . . , f ~~. , /:;- -,- ::. ~ d .~ ". ["". 1'- THOMAS ~p~~ELS, residing at: 89 Hayw~r Drive, NASSAU ~ .. party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heIrS or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lyingandbeingil[)IJe Orient, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: ~ BEGINNING at the corner formed by the intersection of the easterly 81 of Narrow River Road with the northerly side of Orchard Street: RUNNING THENCE along the easterly & northeasterly sides of Narrow Rjv Rd. 1. North 15 degrees 44 minutes 40 seconds East, 311.32 feet: ann 2. North 39 degrees 12 minutes 30 seconds West, 328.57 feet: THENCE along land now or formerly of Edwin H. King; 1. North 42 degrees 29 minutes 50 seconds East, 221. 79 feet: and 2. North 36 degrees 14 minutes East 80 feet, more or less to the ordinary highwater mark of Hallock's Bay; THENCE Easterly, southeasterly and Southerly along the ordinary high- water mark of Hallock's Bay, as it winds and turns 975 feet more or less to the northerlycside of Orchard street; and THENCS Westerly along the Northerly side of Orchard street, 100 feet more or less, to the corner and point or place of BEGINNING. SUBJECT to covenants, easements and restrictions of record. SUBJECT to riparian rights and easements of others over Hallock's B".\ SUBJECT to the rights of the United States Government, the Sta te of New York, and Town of Southold or other municipal agencies to regulate and control the use of piers, bulkheads and land a.djaf'ent to the water. TOGETHER with raIl right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER wi1h the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the part~ of the .fIrst part covenants that th~ party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said prermses have been encumbered In any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the partv of the .first part will receive the con,sideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such cOI;sid- eratlOn as a trust fund to be applIed first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the Improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN.WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above WrItten. IN PRESENCE OF: $_.'5)J.~~.. REAL ESTATE AUG 1 ~ 1983 TRANSFER TAX SUFFOLK COUNTY 2.114 before me On the day of personally came LI~(R~4lJ8r!lif )I'tA S'r A Tt'OF NEW ylrJ/r(,"EOUNTY OF 6n the 1st day of August personally carne stFOLK 19 83 ' LAWRENCE S. INGOLIA to me known to be the individual executed the foregoing instrument, executed the same. described in and who and acknowledged that C~ ~?J~L NO'T'ARY PUBLIC c,m:[RI~'E IC~GOGLI!\ No\al"V PCD::r::, S\z:L; of :"L;',\' York . . ',' /<:'7(:01'2 Rps;d1il~l \:1 . ;',8. ':\J y;.~ Co';;;';,L,'::.:: '0. :;, .:'.;'C:I 30, 198f S1 A TE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF On the day of 19 , before me personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he is the of , the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. JSarllain anb illalt :mttb Willi Cuvt"AN I AGAINSI CR6,N hR's Ac IS ilLE No K ~.- ) IS) ~ r. G T. LA WRENCE INGOLIA " '-,. TO THOMAS SAMUELS STANDAR.D FORM OF NEW YOIlK IOARD OF TInE UNDERWRITERS dO TI~~;.~~~RANTEE. NEWYORK A TICOR COMPANY 55: STATE OF NEW YORK.tUNTY OF 55: 19 , befor~ me to me known to be the individual executed the for~going instrument, executed the same. described in and who and acknowledged that 55: STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF 55: 19 , be fore me On the day of personally came the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. with duly that he knows to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw execute the same; and that he, said witness, at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. SECTION BLOCK lOT COUNTY OR TOWN TAX BILLING ADDRESS Recorded At Request 01 The Tille Guarantee Company RETURN BY MAIL TO: THOMAS SAMUELS 89 Haywater Drive NR s sau Point, New york Zip No. J fiUldlY 1~l;U;,'~. ",,,........ "'~ ..-". -- .' . (' '.' ,,~. "'" j'/;,7C9,"2 Residing li1 oU:',"', v.:>. "..,. .:0 JJ', CC;i~rni::s;~:1 ,;:. ~;;::rch 30, 19Bf s T ATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF On the day of p~rsonally came to me known, who, being by me duly say that he resides at No. 19 , before me sworn, did depose and that he is the of , the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. J;argain anb iDalt :lIBttb TITLE N:." H covOC '~~A'YkGi5hRS Ar'.S G. T t LA WRENeE s. INGOLIA TO THOMAS SAMUELS STANDARD FORM Of NEW YORK IOARD OF TInE UNDERWalTf.1U tiIJ T;~;.~du~RANTee. NeWYORK A TlCOR COMPANY 55: STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF ss: 19 J before me On the day of personally came the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. with duly that he knows to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw execute the same; and that he, said witness, at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. SECTION BLOCK LOT COUNTY OR TOWN TAX BILLING ADDRESS Recorded At Requesl 01 The Tille Guarantee Company RETURN BY MAIL TO: THOMAS SAMUEL.S 89 Haywater Drive Nassau Point, New york Zip No. w u ::: ~ o '" z <; '" o ~ '" ~ o w '" :> '" ~ w U <( Go '" '" :;: .. ~\ . , r )no ,UnS I-1ll;\O "'\I.'tl'jiD J~.'" 'JI'\\11\\'I 'jDI' . . ail'~fla " , ~ q,: i9 ~ \ 1l1\'U a3GllO';)1'd . . ,< .. . . .f; APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT NOV 1 ," I R[ClJ To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: L The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) ~ 2, The name of the subdivision is to be--/~~e....~. ............................................................................................... 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested. ) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: fJ~/}9' Liber ........................ Page .. .ol~~.........,.. On " ,E!/!7./R-?.....".; Liber ........................ Page ...................... On ......................., Liber .,....,......,.......... Page ...................... On ......................., Liber ,.,.,....,.............. Page ...................... On ........................ Liber ........................ Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On ........................ as devised under the Last Will and Testament of .,......................,.....,........ or as distributee .........................,........",..,................................ ............................................... ............................................... 5. The area of the land is . ..j: 7.:f......... acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except .if( ~. . . ................................................................................................ 7. ~~~t;a~~ i(sr~~70~f~~~ ~y .@!.f!;tf!!Jj)~~"""""""" (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber .-'t.v.~':?",... Page .;:;l.~~..,....". in original amount of $)t?~J.ppq:~"unpaid amount $ /?!t?/..tJ()tJ..~?>.." held b~~.~~ .............. address 1:?7.1f~y.~;/~?1iY//Y'btf (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ,......,. Page .,....,.....,..,.,..... in original amount of ....,......... unpaid amount $....,. . . , , . , . . . . . . , . ., held by .,.............,...... . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. address ................. ..........,.,.,.,..........,............,..... " A . . ;I .' (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amonnt of .............. unpaid amount $...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. held by ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. address ......................................................... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except .<f:t:~............... ....................................... ............................................... 9. The land lies iu the following zoning use districts ... P?~: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................................................................ 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex. cept ..~........................................................................ 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (does not) lie iu a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis. . 'f 'h' D" . ~ trlct, 1 'VIt In a Istrlct, 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13. Water mains will be laid by . ..~.... ........................ ..................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for instalIing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by .~............................... lines. ..................................... and (a) (no) charge will be made for instalIing said IS. Gas mains will be installed by .~.... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule HB" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "e" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets w hieh are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showi"g all restrictions. covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". " . . . ,- 22, The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $./f1..&1tIt!... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at ....... . . . . . ,. years. The Performance Bond will be written by DATE a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F"{J .....lI/!.:?.... ,.............., 198'3. ,~.r.xf.~:....". ,.' (Name of Applicant) BY"~"""""""",,, (Signature and Title) (A ' ~~S).........&l.~;;y STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ,~""'"'''''''' '" III c;" iM~ 8'~ On the .................. day of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 19. . . . . ., before me personally came . .5.~. ~.'. ~.......... to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that. . .l~.. " . executed the same. 9 IY~. .............:-:~..~/I~................. Notary Public ---- PEGGY FINElU- NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 471~725, S'dfo!k COunty Te,'nrl:",-,,,,-,. 'hr"" 11" 'Q'J(,' L,'.,...", ,I.u ...': _.t. L...lL.T STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF............................ ss: On the ................ day ............ of .............., 19. . . . . ., before me personally came . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that. .. . . . . . . . . . resides at No. .................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that ...................:...... is the .......... .................. of ......................................................................... the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that ............ knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. anrl that. . . . . . . . . . .. signed.............. name thereto by like order. Notary Public ............................................ J'l:S r;:~JCT lOllS: (a) III order to ons\,.::r the qU'::5tions in this short E^F it is assum" thot the preporor viII use. currently ovailoblo inforGotion concerning the project ()nd the .1i1:ely impacts of the ~clion: I~ is n~t expected that additional stud.le~, research or other .lnvest.lgotians Will be undertaken. (b) If any question hos beon answered Yes the project may be ~i9nificont. and 0 cO:;1pleted E:1v.ironr.1~ntul Assessment Form is. necessary. (c) If all questions hove been answered No it is likely that this project is ~ significant. (d) Envirorl~~ntal As~c~5m~r,t 1. \'/1.11 p,'oject result in 0 large physical change to the project site or physically alter more . thr:n 10 (Icres of lund?....................... Yes v"'No 2. \"Iill there oc 0 major chanGe to ony unique or - -. ,ur,usuol lone! fOIrn found On the site?......... Yes Vf10 3. \'/ill project olter or hO'le 0 large' effect on - .- existin[j body of water?...................... Yes....-1lo 4. \'/ill project have 0 pot'"ntially large: impact -;-.' -:- on 9rouncJw"i0r quality?...................... Ycs~~No 5. \'/ill proj oct signi fi conUy ef fed drainage . -:-- -.- flo\'l On adjacent sites?....................... Yes......,qo 6. \','ill project affect on)' threatened or - -' endonocr<:d plont or animal species?.......... Yes VNo 7. l'Iill projc::t result in 0 rnoj,'r adverse effcct.--:- .~ . 1 ." ? . . Y . .-, on o~r (lua.~L)'....................................... CS........-r--IO U. \'Iill prnject hove 0 major eff<:ct on visual . - - ChGTClCier of the cor,ll.luni~v or scenic views or vi;;[o;; known lo'be import~nt to the community?~Yes~o \'/ill project adversely i::>pact any site or .' structure of historic, prehistoric or . . pa.leonto.1.('gicol imrortonce or any site clcsigncJtccl as a cl"iticol cllvironmerltol crca "y a 10coi' ogeI1-)'? . - ..... .. .. .... .. Yes ~o u .. ..... .......................................................... ...........-r'~ 10. \'Iill proj,'ct hove (J major effect on existih!) - - or f u t u r 0 r e c r ,: 0 t ion 01 0 Cl P 0 l' 'I. Un i tic s? . . . . . . . . . Yes v1l0 11. \I.Ul project result in .m~jor traffic problems - ~ Or cav;;e 0 major effect to exisling tron;;p<lrtotion systoms?...................... Yes .::.t<ro 12. \','il1 project .reGularly Couse objectionable - odors, noise, glore, vibration, or electrical disturbance os 0 result of the project's operation?.... " . ..... . . . . . ... . . .. . '" . . . . . . " . Yes~No 13. \'Iill proj<:ct hove any ir.:poct On public heal th - or. so f <: t y? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes a..-1\To I'/ill project offect the existinn community by - - directly cousino 0 growth in permanent pO;>lllotion of more thon 5 percent over a one yeor period or hove a major neD~tive effect on the choraCter of the co,omunity or n e i g h 0 0 dlO 0 d? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes ~ I" ~here pul).lic c~ro\Mila~ce~!.l.'J. th~_ ~\ P"o.Ject.?\.~fl'1.~...~............ .~~~~..,I Yes .......-t-lo - -. PREP/d~Er.' S S]Gll/\TUr.[_~ r. . REf>P.ESEfHlUG fI~. 11,. 15. ''',,:,6'.'''')''''''1''''1 .-:..:.~v~J"\..;\..\!:',lt\_ "'Ct.:(<';I""J"'j f.I'1 }I.,)-'.....)-'"I'_l~ 9 . D^TE 8~ . . , Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the eXisting roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, ~. . /UCI' -,..)7-2-3 OWNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .lOPERTY RECORD CARD . ) '11 - / f7 STREET VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT C-'Y\_k) I, \ A S ~6~-:vJtJ E,I,.,S "FORMER OWNER LS. "IwG.QI...!A. ..) c... 'I r" l\' Vr.MTi J (D/ ' 5Q -:/ Tr7;d"~ ~ I~L OL RES. sEM. VL. 3 {3 FARM !lAf(K'o~/R,vn: RD In,,0';" f N I E ACREAGE R. \.J. 1L US J./1iU ;/",iloc.!. r.;?"" W ...J h_ 1'f5~ -tY'6YrH.J 'i(. ;,.,. 'in. . r:!oMM. I IND. , CB. ,;J-- ]Jt2-SC. - -:So 7 S TYPE OF BUILDING I MISC. I Est. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE 2LflD .:?JOQ --.f j(;/,. v ( ~\t- W:,' .' J""....),l v' .J / ~ /; / ./~ (,./ REMARKS '.... .." _,-.. i r... j , 'I' ;"\.' '~l) . .' .f:, ,lp(Pl2..S;JE'mcxn, 'lJ.l'i\I)l i-\(\\O 9::d in \...1 f.GI\LIv'l L-'lI;0:P~<; . I ,,{I~ < /. EJ. I ~~LbI3~t(l), If-JGou ~Il) S'AV\iWGL'3, l~q4-ogl)- .)Zt":, -----.---- - NORMAL BUILDING CONDITION BELOW ABOVE Acre Value Per Acre Value FRONTAGE ON WATER FRONTAGE ON ROAD BULKHEAD DOCK t) 7~Jf-. I I ..t;"(Jl) @ 5,'- :2 ~(~U ..tV'S e /.1-." I '1 00 .iLT-'.~-- -- .~_. Total p~=_. ~ ~ ~ ' J\r'1/iVOR /\/1 4'-::",0 , iF i ... ., ~')B' ,. 'I "j ,/.-. ',/ ....J L L ,: / 1,../ <J I C.! J V P'O 'lC-';::' /;'"1..." I<:- V ~ __ """,,<-. T OF .su/ZveYe D P''':.!. . } -, I/' " A ' """ j f ....J ; ... i "'--; ,) S .''\ l' I C' , - H (\..- v (..: f..4 ~J AT OelE3N-r -- SUP'FOLK. co" N, Y. _._____..___../L_ _ _ .___,."____ {) cafe r /0 0 ' = /.. -,,~QEA: 3.}5 ACI:z.E::5 ()62!.!.,1o.U ~' .:,../,,) ~ fai.f ,. __~_...____....-L- _ 5u/.fo/~ C oLlnf" ,ax Parcel: /1,"sf. /~ ..:,:.~ Sdtt: .../:Z'~ (:5;, 2t,,'..C'f.3 ~ ;;:: F',il',,$ ,. -; . .~- J r..<"; Pi'eI71.:.st'il are In 8~;'d'/t1q ;::c..'ne ;cj', .. Ploo,j' 2~nlr. ~7'(L;/,iO) t(.Ic..'i'~j' -St!i.,o'c' ,/>1<1 4I(:W':;-9"'" d/.s,':J':'';!.~.. sf;!fell.'s ro Ineef cm-l~d7' heolfh ::eft: ~fond""'4.$ ,Vo /cr ",'.D be .l_rrlter. 4abd~ ~'/'~"4i. ''''' r"~ ; ,'/'". , . 6lJ~V6l1ed A.'o. I, /983 J IZO.c.'cktC4:. VFlN -rt/ 'rl-. Po:;:, ;:2., V __ T-.. ..( .y ,-I L./ceNsed Lana ,;5"rV4'1",.... wr-cenibcrr; ;./ Y' , \-1 ,~- '. .; t-)- ~.,_, _J 1""1 ~1 '. '~r, (:"1 '~ , , ,', r' ,(J G :.it. " ..J ,t . , / '",/ ('/,. ~.f' I /. t. ..,~ : ..;r4 .~./ . r"";/ ".V /' . & 7S .... . . < ., ,:' - f !.~ \ :;.,',.- '- -'- " ~ ~.... _.~~." ;" . , -' . ~::-; -1 " ~', '.' / f- !,.';/ / . ., l),.'i~. ,:' ,t..- !. a.' : ..~ :\'. .;.., c, i ~ " ',j \i:; ?~ ", ". ~, ' , . :" 5 "/')' lt\' NC,." 62 ~O_:.' o ~~ ". , '\. :,e..,(. _ 'lk _1 .~~:} ,:) \< ~ L *. I I I,"~ l 8/,00C :~ :'; -: D '1. IS' .~~A; .~-)( -i i...-: ..... ,}. V ',' (~ " ,~I/' jj!p (l,,, ~."':'-' ..t ,/ "l' '0; \J . . '- , r..<J " Ii ";/ j:' ?".~ " J~ ,. , \(; " ,,rJ. \ \\......e--:.- , . ~., / ." i I' " t.i!':!~"';". I ~ " ~, )... /'1 Iv ~, , . ~. '- ('l','. , "( :;"-'(<,' :;:; ',:;r.."::~~"'- /,~',':"'.."-"~ _/'-- ". '-, -.... ....:' ;f',' . /I; /r)r'~ ;') ~ '_.~: (1_. ~: I <' 0 :'f ('1 ";- ~. :lJ.m . 'J " '0' . ,1'. - ':... Vi C c- /', '~r. . '.' ",i.' ' ' , S. l'!'. ": "'t. :} i, / '. 4" ,':,' . .-+--.... ',', ...'.....-Ie ,. K ~~ ,r::;-, ~ ~,F, " '7' ,/ / I ./: <" y\ ". .t' ~\ .( :r:,,_" 'I . 1/'," r,.-).1 . \\1./ . 0,\4 l\\ . ., 0-( . .:; \ ~: -' -;:-::.. ",' < , /> . /" n..... -..;,;, , .j............ "- ; ~ f ':...-...-,(' '.p . '"t .-' - ---~.~- , - ~/'" . :0'<:-: ~.' ~ " :,.~~:.c: ~ !'-' " - ~"...j .. ",-:,,>,:::--C " . " \1'1 ""'_.-i , ! ' '~. A ..... .~- , , , 'y ,,' ,,' REceIVED BY SOUTHOLD TOWN PlANNING BOARD - Ff:~.. ,~~c ~w.. ".\ ,. 0-' .t' ,- / . ~ L () "~' ,.'; ..", .-"',:. :. },-~,,'f-' Sc. BOO';::;'" '" . .\ , J.:, v:;"/;.: ;,<v. ;7-Y' ......' ~ ")-(., <, . ,. McJl"'/~14 ,. ., ., '. ...~.n~ -~,. ,'~ c 'v ?'<v , '" "f' _~-:":E ...); '-:'1__::; "'lW, .,_~ -}:.):,""'--;_;'~' J", "'-:~J i'l.<\";':"';:' ., 1,1 t--l ,.,.",',;:;'r.;~',;}", ,,~ --J-':"h'::.:-(. ;",,\,. <"1..'i;',,~J"'" - 14-- i , i i , I t MINOR. SuBD/VIS/ON "'4 ~p at::: PR.OPj;;~f<.+-Y 6UfZVl!YE 0 pall.. 7-HOMA .s SAMUELS AT Oe/eNI 6UPFO/...f.(. N. Y. CO'J !J_c.q!~ ~c{ 00' == ,.. fJR- E ~_:__3. 7~ AC; R.l:J~ (;_63, ~_OQ .5w.PI.") . :5.u.lfclit.. Counf, rax Parcel: lJ"~t, !(jO(), .$e.: ,02?; S/, z.Ll.of'.3 . == Pi!s , 3 .-f\")ke Pt't!I71/.:s4'S 4t't! In 8~ild"r1'j Zone A'. .. .'.. F 100 d Z()r1i! ~ 7 '(iiI. /0) uh;t-er -.s</I'.Jj;;/y 41',,1 411111498 ~ d,.sl'a~../ $f4fldJ.$ ro I'1'1IN!f' cnunfy Heall-h l).!:j:d~ $fand4r'4,S. / No lor fa be f,-,..f-It~" 4,-,6d/~'/~/".d. , E/~:~"\; "",",~" I-~, d QRAUlt'lo.n.tJ.l .,~II::."'PV~ ,V<< ~Llt .- [0 nil~ WllVt't' \s A'fIOLAflO".~' il<1]'10~ 71Jl9 OF HU Nk.W rOW :llA1l IP~JOf'l LAW. 1IQ!IES Of lH'S SUlMY IUW MOl IIflIO!Q pl:E V..~~, .,.{,,),y';rt'~ "vn:: ".t 0:'19.,,,,,,, b~vj).,;; .k,-.. lQ If. A v...~:o ~Ui'''''t(T!fS ltJ;;;,-A~';\~ .<~~'.~r;_ :;t\~.~l ~I~"., Y TO THf ;::,y:;,;~l Hi't ...,rl....M THl - .. C)NL ~~ ,.,,;) o~.: ,"j~;..i.~:....Lf fO ?fit ~u. (DJA":\;.!'I, :,;~Y;J,~.~:~fI"T""l ~,_..",I tJ;XDI,biG 1r.;.:.Td'JT'ON L1SI:'.D He~ o;r.: lQt .......GIi~$ 0. 1til. \.fNDlNG II'L')1 m, G'-"wMTS ""'1 HOT TlAlIil5M't_"" Im'JO:tJJ ' ,-''''-'''''l''l''I0~ 011 w"-<;"'~~ -y' ~'N~'):l11~"""'" .,w;&.,~. 1_ -f-r..-# ,I. .,';-.""/" f.-. 'I,f"(~'f/ \/ .-:1 ]'f"!."if;. () I,. ..r.... < , ,; ..,,: 6"'t'v~'Ied ND;/. I, /983 /i?ODEIi?ICJt. \/,..N 7"UYL., Po c. Z. V __ 7~~.,~ H '1" ,':<1',,,.::J !, ,-::/. 4-1 ..,! ).~', ; N,'.. r- ,_ . - I../censed Land' .:$61r"'4</0". .".1I4H/U,,--I; /oJ, Y l..-er'-". _ I :::.,~~-1 '. ,\', , J;.-.,. ~(~, ~ / l'~ 1I !: .' , ~\i G ...~ ," ~,~. . ,\-0 ..r . ~ "..t 'I" ,~ . 7.! I . ,'11 >J ? '.' :l ". ~ f \ ,~ & ~. " . '.j '~ ,) ~~ ., l.i, , .... "11 ~:,. , . ..:0 ".: , '/ -, r! :' ... " , -. \... -. '.1' ~ r'l .... ..: ~ " , :",(i' ,1i""~; ~ /-. .-4' '" ",:" < /:>//J'....t:. ..; (: t7c'/ b'JJ~? . ~, ~ :;,..,:,. /"f'r -i #-" ".,. f).i.... -~ .',) ;::z.-.' "; '1, ", 'I ,~ ,/ ,'.' It ~~ C.()~ III "l' I .'_' ,c/) --r-'. -, . , "0' I 0' ~ '- ' ,! ""82,=00 t, t 1-,. ,Ij....:.... . "t ~ I :,0)( <: * " I ..::.:> 0_. '1 -, 4 " 8y.--T' , ~ 1"'-, tZ'l I \f:'. /' 81,000 S.F, / ~.'- - ..~ 7-[:;......-7- H{'/-4'h' .J-,.;, _Of': , ,..'".... -.;r . lOll S(:1.'J<"i'1 ;'O,:'itt J' '1". ;c7f",. . 'l< .\ l',' r , c ..t:L.l - ;\11 . ~~~ ~~"\\ '.,~' , /' ; 'v:~ , ,'I .~ , .- .4 r K-~"~C~! ,-,,,,' .' , :',.. I~ \r:' . '/ ~".'t . ~.p '_,,,,....;/ r.' ',.-? 'lo.....;: . '~. ' }t. -bC'- _ .~ "7'" :' / ~ _~.L, t.#' - \r\. _~'_ ,Z '.' ,.,' -J',-,-_ . :)$:' .K --Jlv_ ~--=:;::::::' ,,~_ 'f " ~. 'f" /\,' ~, :. -1. .~ ""~ . r ,;1" , ,,~: (4 , / ; ,'O~,.., /,.,.. /- '. .... X, '/1, ) / ,l" '" .I l,i, " JAN 071985 I' , " .< , ~ f/ .,1 LOChi.'O.... .'-.r1,,::;p Se. BOO'='" . if'. <>~ <- ....~. .... 0', /./.,'vc'li1 J/l.t;).. AV' .ttfi.-', ~'-" r::;:.~!.~~..."it}$ P'/MJf';""''-.. ..--I .s~. .' 'Or -', ~ ~ 0(' '-' y'" \A ,. "; .i T .-..a..' ~- ~-, t~ i ~ -" 7-~~. '-'J -- . r1':r,~,... ... lv1/ ,v OR.. or ~. B'" 'L 'I " IN '.JC/ JL// " ui0 . " :~::"F - ."!,J/. "/f .~ 0 . .. ~ .. ., j,.~/ , . P12 O/:JEk.T)-~ 10" 6UlZv/eyf:. v F'<.t:l.. S ?\ 1\.1 (j !::: l._ ::; .:'j".J;}(~/, .. I ......j/"'. -f _" ~ i f' ,-,J tv, 1'1 <....) .'(/..-:1/ " J .::'; F"'" ,~. , AT Qf.? 19 tV 7- / :l" '7,1-('.,: T' .(F'. . -. ':i/''-:{:i.. ,,,." ....-.~... 0 ;.0 -I>~. .~..... '1-' . S~. /' ....Jo" -</ ~. ." /- "" ,''-,~> ,'.- r',:d:/. .-: ..1." ; ."'l.lIy 5 U P'FQ L I'::" . .EQ'L ,ti__ Y. ". ~. / , ~) '- ',' ~~.. .;';', "':. .If c. 'i 11; \. 'j: J) . ~ \! ; ~j . (. v.Q -.,.. ~........... '::l" ~~. .'r.(j~' 4" \ . J'''~- ,>: VJ I .,. '.. & ~ C1 ' . :;.,.., \\'r. . / .,1.-- J '" .::.-:::- ,..-~., '- ",<-. ......... . ," y. ,'. ...' ".."'" ,.", '.,r."",. S)', .J;'''' -,C/ \ "'.,'-'b. .. /~ "', '.:,- ~ /- ' ~. '." . , . /'0 . ).e/'; ". '.~ /'// " eC~":>;:?- ., n , .- C- .....44 .")., ... \, \.. 47' "'?(. .' :;;."Cl// b~ , \...' --. -.~ . f(".^ ,'" l')~. -y';l:;;"." -;r~'-=c: "#1/' F l}\: _\. ,,",: l,.; /' ~ ~. ~ <,~,>' ~\; 0(')10 /}-'C "V . ~ I': i'<..-:; ':~ilO(/ ~,c/ A"/';; 0'" '\ . ,I .lI..l~( .:H),' /In: -rJr.> ;A"'Oil};' "It '_' .....1/. \") _ .~p:"~ - t)" fJ )'(\ -:I o( ,!9 II , Scale: /0 c; , .::: /" /J) ~-~ to' t, ~. 'l< ?ikEA: 3. 75' .~CQE-': [) ()6::jL30":';_~'ft8J..!::'Q i) -'.:- S -,' 'r:.~:o'-.!! -B2, eGG , o S '-'ifo i"'- CCLltl'fr rax Parcel: lJ....;ff. /.;,(),,;~ ..sG.~..)z'~ Sf. z.1.;.~)f3 S,."'. , .'! . '" :, . J \" 1 f, . ~...;.' ; C', Pi!,e ,- 1-':1;,:"'"' " -. s , ~ "4:.':: , "t:r :,UX'~ '" L- . ____ '. I r f)' .c .- .~ Ii ....' . .~ ~co i-'i'el?f.:.:st'$ "- X: 8~iid/t11 Z",'ne t'J Plood 2{)n~ ~7'("'I,iO) are In :.." 1 "L}I.-r \ (7. I \.~ 8/,000 ~. P. ~l " -, .. K (.. l' t, '.. ~ f('~ ~ ..: ~ / tL!af'~'-'-.stl:r~/Jiy' J.~<fnJ .sew<4ge... cJ.$lh~~J:,' .$f4rtflt;...s 1"0 u1eef C()(./r1fr Healf-h lJeff. sfond4r"d.s. ,~ C ~ , .' r 'j ~ )I. .' d. 4tJbd.-.'/,,/..,d. lOT fo,'o /",,.flt~r 7",,:> oe () '1;./ .0-,-- ",," if" -, {f"'"I', .. ..; ; f l.-,:J ~. [.\ .~ rf'~ i.'r"" _4 "" ":--i ,J' k1,i .~~ I' ~,~ } .,"" " ~ ..... , . ~7 II'" .. 7.r.~.~~~~:' ., ~f~,::~: --, ,~..,.....~ " '" ..,.... "," ~ ,.- ,..''''- It. . -a"'-',/f~:/-~ . "J.- ~ t; , <-) . 1" " .~ . /1, .. r~"'!' V 1- " /\ c .V / "(\G\ 1)\0 LOC,'1-;',('I,'.' /.d,~p ,.jil $c. SOCI' =- I"~ " \,,,~ ..~ Un;: '!h'}ri~.!d alter"ltion or addition y': b .,,~ ""~ ',cy IS.J ...iolatic>n of S",'_H)r\ 7209 of the New York State _t:tf? , 6'ul",,'d<led i J2.0L>i:;ktCI(, /.....;] Ii I, /983 Vt:JN 71.1 r'L., P.". z. V -- T-. '+-a. " Jl.l;; ~lv'HIt:.' '. ,\ ; L '\ .... . 'I've' ". c' ~ i:>-IL"~a1it''' Law, ,.j ..1 ./ (qw;<; ot this survey map not bearing the land surveyor's inked seal or embossed seal shaH not be conaktered to be a valid true copy, Guarantees indicated hereon ahlH n.m only to the person for whom the aurvev IS prepared, and on his behalf to the title company. governmental IQ8nCW' and lendmg institution listed hereon and to the assignees of the tending I~. tuliOI"l_ Guarantees are nat ttansfenbJa to additional institutions or lublequent -owners, "<< '''I.,;' .... ''t" '\.'...., , . M4~'44 ":0 .n :1'-( ,~,~~ a~ V'" ,,\ I' ~ RECEIVED BY SOUTHOLD TOWN PlANNING BOARD HAR i 4' 19S5: N r' i -'Eo>! LJceH5sd Lana ..'51J"Yi!'lo"'~ (ir-"uu',b~,..t', N. Y .""?' J a n, '~'Sf, Ic;X~['~ - -.. DATE ~'~,....." [~~:e .-.;) ~Se$ , .... ,\ 1 ,..~-- ~"'~". ...... .. , (', 1 .",,-- r---.-- i I I , I +- I , i I I , , , \\J__ , . , L\., l'v1/NOR SUBD/VISION M.f~'te ._OF.. PI:?OPE12.T)/ 6UlZv'gycO r'w" 'r-J-IOfvtA ..5 S~MU~LS A-r OJ<./eN-r _,?!!F'~o/...t<:.._c;O__.L . N..:.....-.y. tS cede: /0 () ':; /" ?:if2.EA: 3.75 .4CR..E [) (i63, ~WQ Sw.F/;) ._...._____ .on _.. _._ . ,_'__" ._._.__._____~ 5uJ:,.fo/~ cO<lnfy rax Parcel: I'I.it. 1.000, .5d':,OZ'l, B!. Z/..::.f3 $ ~ F:';be ;- 1! I! .:~: , P;'el'n/.s,s ,7ye In B~iI4/r11 ;'::one t')'. ,. F / (./ CJ.j Z "UN: 'A 7 . (a;, i 0 ) u/aroti' -,~'it_j."'1 ,;nd 6t&U)Cij8 - .i..:J/,C.$d/ $f4felt;'J 1'0 ,neef cm.."fy Neall-It [Jeff. ..sfand4.-d.:;. 7 I/O lor 1" be /"'rflr~,' 4ubd: ~'/G'''''4'. ,:-="1,_" , - - ,'- .J "'/1 "',-'i" ~ 'I' ~.; ~/~. ' -J r'~- ,I<. \.;. . ~. " 6u"v'~'It!ld ......J .', I, /983 /Z.ODEk:tCIl. VAN ''-' Y.., F:. c. .12.. V -- T. ~ :;1 . /:, ../ c. , ~'..:. ~f ~I . I /"lcen.seCl Ldni3 ..:5fJ".....4'/"'... wr't!ltllH!u,y"l, ~. y .I" " .. - . 7.~ . _ J ; I >~ , ~ ~ .' , 1':1 ( G " ~I " 'V :" ') " 'J ~ '.,0.-' . b \'~ " :;' ,^ " -'i ..: . . , '. ,; ~ " " ., " [~/ - ..j ,!' ,) , .~ " ". \., r,,-: ;'lj 'v. , -~ l'l.~"'t',,~ ~ ~..: J4. q r...; t. :r, IlE(:FIVFn P,Y SOUlHOLD TOWN PlANNING BOAnJ NOV 5 198L DATE F.l:',.,,'[ .f:"- -' ~ ::~' .~~ .';..t .. b',:J :/. h''; i~Z " '/ (,./ l( ~'__~;;:~~~: if) ?; I "'. _ ~, r 82. t'.-I'......;, to ~ , ,-, " ,", -~ .,0)(., "!It .. ,:. .L.. !-:: ,~i.' ;. ,: .'-:"...) - "-..;' I ~oop., ......---..-+-- .1 '0 ......, .: . 1( ~)If; r \ .fl.' / 80,600 .",,'~ -- .s: """"'~.- -f ;;:~ - '-' . i ~ l' ,.. , r.;- \?::: ... ~.F. " ..,.. .. / . :1'-" ,A ..:;:".~ .- -"/:~' (, ,y\' -- ~-",. . .'" ,n' / ,.;.,'" ,:Y /",..\ '.....< (~ ) J!!' :, /1/)1fj.O .: ~. -' .;~ "~ ~..,' ,/ ( --:1/ ~~ if ,. ... /'1':' \, " .$'.1'. ..c.'. -.... ,. , c :~,...;;. ':0 ' ,,,," ," J .f- .S () _of..." ~~. .If; In '" < ':~.~ !-;' ( " , ,J;; .If; ;. ~~"l ~'i'\ '. .., ~ >< lI< ~o N "- ~( ~..k '-, " "- .~.- .............. '/ ~~.~.. .. , ,<",/ <~, . " c . .,-:." ~~ ~ 1- , ....~ 7-f::'... ~7~ f-r'.;:; L i;" h;/:) - s,)i,' I.J" .5dJJ(.f</ .'O.-:/f/ 3' $'" ~'<1'f<'Jr4 -, .,~ ~ ./ .f ..t._~\.-'i " r0 i -I",;.... ....li.'..) ,.",-;j " ','.' ;;'}f';'.;'.- !. <\ Sc.800'=='" .J- 0 C ,.'1 .~', I.....' .l",}~;.;;-' .. .r.p', .>-. .~ ~ -". . .~ .',. . ,.... . cv "," ,,. vi . . , "'.... c . .... ~. ~:.._. nze,>4'.se:s c~.. ~~" , . ~ . .'" ~,v,l;-l" J,/.U. .' 1'4"";44' .~ , ., 'Or' J ........ , ..-<< -1- j I I ---------.---------- .------- -=- MINOR. SUf:3DIV/S/ON - MAp (Ji= PR.ORER.TY-- ~l!IZV~YE D F'alZ. TJ-IOMA6 SAMUELS AT O/Z./E Nr SU/3FOLJ(;. CO., N. Y. IS Ct::1/e, 1004= ," AR.EA: ~.. 7S ACR.e:5 ('163, 300 dQ.t:rr.) ~if.U-'!!.k:_..9 OU!!t.t--!.~~_!!..'! ".c~h J)1!!:~()()!_~4~:('J_Z.l!! I. z, l.Dr!._ . :;If PI". PI'e,..,/&.. 4,.e IltJlldiif1 Zo,.,<< A'. pt-Ioo J Zelte W 7'(81. to) In - .. .. '/ ltIt#fl"~~Nl'ply d"J UIII41#- d''4,6(,)4'" $f4h_~>' ro mil." CDun';41 NI!lt:7ll-h Depf: ~tqnJ..":J4. _/ f '/ ~/ No leT- -to b. :I~,.Ht.,. 41J""'ititl,d. ~~ ....t.., '"..~y "-;' ..- <~, ,5UI'v#Ij"'d HOII. /, 19113 /z'ODii"IC/I.. IIIQ,.. r"y,", Po c. Ji2.. V _ 7:-__.i. ____________ _..0 ____.....____. ~~_____ IIB1\J1THOIILW AUtJIAIII,).... VI. ADOlIIe.,. m lHlS suaVEr IS A VIOLATION OF lECTJON 7209 OF THE NEW YC;u( STAn tm.I.C,.,TION LAW. -=oms OF THIS SURVEY MAP I'-IOT lI~A~IN(; r):e LAND 5URVEYC~'S irK,;) $:Al Oil. 1.''''!!OSSED SEAL S:iAtL ~:::;r EE CC1\:SIOfll.fD fo Bf A VALID nu~ CG't. I../C'H6.rI 1.4nd ,;j"rV44/"'" ti,...I'I,b~rl, 10/. Y. p"JARANT~ES J~I~lCAT::; ~!:~,~'::-N SHALt. tUN ,:::,..;~y TO T:-:E H~Sa:' r")K ,,""HOM THE SW~> lj "<l.fPAR~D, AND O~l l'i:S C~i~ALF TO fH~ (l:~f CCMrANY, .:;O,'w;:;..:i:NrAL AG~NC\ . 1.".l~:j~G 1:-l'..TJiiJ"jl:):'i lI:;.m Hf~EO"', ......,. t) -,\:E "~IGN~S5 Of FlE te~I}I"IG I"'~ n .:,T'/~I; G'JAP.A~H~ts ,.,~, "';H ,~_""~_,,, . <; .',-<..1~10:1J.1. y", _o,_'~'~~_ _ .,.__.~ _'___ .'_' .._......,. __, '0 ~ ,- , I -' V , , / / /; "x. " / ./ ~ ,0 \; ~f1 I:~ " l ~O , -', _ C' 6 ,it- ,('Ii' '/ ... /.. . ,or'. o ' ...-....,/ ..t // \~/ ~. /' .,;' o 1/, .,1' $~": .l-; " . 0' . .~ " lie ! \. ..."./ '~"~ /' . --e- , b"dQ- I "I,f~- / .,) ~~! 9 rJ . ~--;~~--' .','..~;- ;?ZI~7.-~--'e.?- .- -I~' %9 - 50_'#-:------ '- i:;r' ,N.~-- l' - ',- '\ 'JCi, 1.';/': Idll"~ , l - , , I i\tl ~ .It Iil ~ i :;.: ! <). r~J M r--.. -.:: - I ' N. ..I . I Q\! N) j .. :i: I c::, <t I) " $ j ,~ " ,/ P.'tJ,s ,: l: .,,:,',' o t, 83.300 S.~. \ \ . -'- " "- '\ i . ~ ,. 1: ~ ;-. ,~ ~ @ '80,000 S.F. . 1. 4 'J." 'J ,! ~. ./ ~ , , - ~ - 'll'l _'" .r' ~.. :.~./'" /' ,jV " ,,' , ,)-. , I / ./ pA zoo -1:.9-. ....' / o' /" / '"" ~'/x ",,/ 0.( ./. ." /..' ff/ ' - ^ /16 /1'1 ( / o .. ( i :..'""" , v " ~ , 1"-' . ../ 1- -'I ,!! . I {f; ~ .~ .' [)~C'U I~UV it \\1:. I.. 2S=_h rl..'!!!_ hI1"'!!' Sa. sOO' = /" ~/ ./ > //0 '" ~/v.EIl IJ.&;,; floC"!} r4 /. It --- ~-- ,-- /. .~ ----- P' ~-MJnd.'''-'p.'''~ . '"",: ,.' t ~-: _ · .,., V 'V" ~~ , ~ Ut'- 1" o-t- I ,.....C"'~ t . 0"1 '" "t"... . .~- p/i;e""/~:S I '-j .. h ._..1 , .. , I IY)! ...... '!J $ "-Ii tl. I ".t! l') ..... ~ , r-... , , . -~ V) III () ~, ''\:- .... I I'-."j , '0'" \0 ~ \) I'l, . .~ ~~ .' . : : I ~ .ll < l1J <::)1 ... .<t " ">", r 1'<)1 ....~ ~, ~ I: ~ () "'I :) . ~1 II) I>; .1: ~ t'~ ). 'i) t:) ~ . I ..;i"; t. ~~ --- , ... \l '", 0 'I) ~' ....' ~ o. <;) ,. i . "I '>), t ... ~ $. \)1 z' , t'{ 'i) "I~ ~ <{ I .. ~ l>t ~ ~ , tt..1 ~'} ~ , ~ , <::) .")! U , , 1lJ1 Ih \ I I V)I ~ .... '-., ! 31 <:J q ~ lj .~~ l),.~ (j ~I ~ ..... ~I ..:.:.: I'S t ~! \ " .:.I~\} ~~ -l l'G UJ "I ~. ~~... 0 \. ct - IJ, ~ "..... If-l., ~ t :) lu' ... ~ 1:1 I., ~, ';l II ...... ~ llli ~ , ~: II" 1() \'I ;. CI) tL' ~; to' ~~ l.. '. " ~! V) 0 \) ~I "l .. .J 2(' e " ,1: l:: '1--.. ' ') ';:)' <t ~ If.l ~l t'!: ~ \)~ ~-f.: lY. '1)1 , " "1- ~ i) \) . I ~ tv I ~ ~ ~t: ~ Q ~I " ' . ~:;, . '> <t t:, ~ .~e ~ ..,. '. < Q VJI ~ ... ltJ ~ If, 1G O' '" "1"- -... ,J: C:i! \)' " I '" -\.. ~ ~ 0 ....' ~ \.\1 +: ,;, --... r-I <tl ~ ... : ~t - , ~ ~j ~ ~. \) Q ~ . I ~~ '< ~I o ~ " '~ ~ m ~~ s.. ~ " ~ ~ 0 O'~ t\. .J,,~,~ 7 ~ b, i ~ ,_ ~ ': ~ "~ . . r ! . -' . ....-.-.-. - ---- . 'lJ ..J '\j :t '" ~i ... '!\) ''\': "l '>i I; .... '. " <:l II) I '~ .... -\'\ '(,% 6-' .-t,.,~ 0:... ~ ~ .<5 "'l ~ ~. '1) :-u .... ,9 - "" !..~-'~.- ..); ope .. rJ' ""-.., \,'y \~ ',"t- J~ '\ \ '- --.----t.. I -~ , <;::>./ ).\'~' ~ ;~~/!'-q" "..a,~ ,~ .~-- 0,:('. ~.,:~ _ __ __,) - - . -i - ;S)C"~-,.c~)L~-L ',-; ~ 9,;'" .\: ()\ "',, ~".-.... "" ",' t'<~ C> ~ .. ;i i \~: "'80~, ~ , N c~ \ "- ..... Q :; , ,\ " . I) ," .' \ , ~,- ~ .~ ..;... ,''l' ~ ~ 1f1'~' .~ \q" III -..;-...., () -:t, ~.. ,,- ~~'t/'~ .... ~ ~, ......;;~ ;J' '''I \ 'i'}. 11 ----- '~ \ ' 'Sl. '.; " 'J \ 'q, \ '" ~ ~' ,,,. ~'\, '!" / 11; \ () '. \ ~ ~ Q , \ I' ~ 0' "'~/l\<'" '- ..~,,'IQ, r-', "- ....._'"-'co.n.; I~ j-r; ~!.'.-- ~ ~ .5''-,r.-. .. t..;l'/,'SI I 'ij~ -.. ~A." ........... -,.:..~ ...-......r .:.-- 11\ r.....~,,'..~...=I' '. -:~..3 /', ; y ...:.: \t, ~ ~ . "'\ .. L"J'g zi: ' . r7 i;;. 0 ~y .~ ,-----~ ~.:> Co/ ""-/':10. -'lo' '; , ,5; "'-'..;0. ~"'~ ~ 0.", ./ 'Z ,- ! >=: <Q~~ O:!j w W Q.. ... ;;:~~~ U:=~ W9:::;) a::~c:t ~ ~ , " "'-\<t '- ~, ... ~ oft ,~ Q l-o Q ~<o \) IJ' I.i ....1'" ~ c- , . , ~ , ., 0. ..,. . ,,:'\ '- f'" /; ,; '. ~;\ . " j, '.- ...'(.1 V ~ ..: :-i )'!!..... " .," "-:)~ - J - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~, :: ~~~z.... ~,: 0'" 0 0"-' -, ". -, ~~~~, q:' ':; ":-J,~"~T:;,; i2!~_~~~...,_~...w;~'.-";"""",;;fl~""- c , ,,' 4' , ~ ~ '" > :t i lIe :'.. ~ \ '.~ :I.'., ~,,\l 'l.~. \ ) <J +" l II ~, O. ... -.L./. ---------. ' _____,_u:________ .. "".. ..... \ , , ,.- ~ ,).) -.I.; 0\ ~ ~ "-.. ~':f ll.\! ~;~ \1'::; " J .';). r,t '- , '", " ~. "1:; 1'1\ \J ~ ~ <J\ '- i 1\. ..... i~ t )o~\..: { .. ~ 1 ~:.l!'\. tlJ? \ ~ . >. III ~. \. Cl ~~ 1 , .... ", ~ , 'T.. .. ) . , ';" -. '^ '.,l...., o ,>,). Co -;. >;. 'l.' \ ['f' ' "i" \ ~I '.1 ~I 1\11 ~l .. \. \I ~ " , ;,). \. . l l Y) i: ~~ r} w~ - ~l. 'll ~ .. l: " .\1 , -.J . __...J, . I I l =l~' ,--...- "-..- ----- , 1____., -e-' --...-.-- - M/IVOR... 5UBD/V/5/0N ,fv1 AP (l{:: OIZ(loE'<.TV 6UIZVE'YE 0 Fall. -T-J-/Qfv1A .5 SAMUE-LS At OIG1E:Ni SUPFO'-~.~O"".L N. Y. 5 cede r 10 0' :;;s I" tCJR.EA: 3.75 ACR..E! 6 (;63, ,~OO SiOJ.P'^I:) _~ ______.__._.____u __~____._.___."_._.________ ______ ... ,:JuJ/oll.:. Counflj rax Par-eel: /)1~t.IO()O, .sec,oz'J, 8/,_2..1.'-.0"3_ ~ ::: Pits Pl'ern/"'$ ar-e BlJi/d/n<j Zone A'. Ploed Zbnl! ""7'(51,/0) Jl"1 .. " .. u/of4r-.slJpply c7nJ lsewa18 - dlSj>C.s4/ $f4r8m.s t-o n"leet CC<lnfr /-leaH-it IN!p/:. ~tond4':".s, / No lot fo be /..,.:flter -,,,,cd/iI/d,d. " RECEIVED BY SOUTHOlD lO\'iil PlANNING BOAf.O JAN 191984 , .' " DATE I 6"uJ"v-''1t1f,;Z NO;/, /, f983 JZOOlil(:tCI(. VAN 7"VYl-, P. c. J2.. V -- T~ '+A. ,.. '/~' i; ./o',; J L-r' ,7rJ. ~i .:' -) 6 ..-/ , /../CtfH4ed 1..4nd' .:5",.ve'lc""~ (i ,. IUl n /uu.t; 101, y, , ~~ ~ ~ ( ~'J 6 '-I ,,!,;' . " k" , ~ \1..... 7.~ ,~.1- ,~ ~...... 'lot". ,& .~~<S' ",,,:~-t~..;"' ..~ ~. . 4<-=, '1, '" :/ ., " :l '..> , . :,\,--- ~' " " c ..;, V 1,'," !> ' " .;,-. < j,A " '" .r: ", , ~. ~ l,' : C~.I N ':'fr' " II , . \IJ ~ ,.... : ~/o > ,) - j 'J (-) ..~' ." ,-, '. \' ^ 'I;, -"\..f't) ;lj i'v-,- . :..:: .c 1.0, -" " t-' .0 ~ ~ , P,','/f .,:;;".--:.;,' ,,'. ;..~';'J ......:-- r' . ',u.'. .:1:..-:....' (iO'{' '1,'';''~; . , . 7.8.;. ~. .r.'(.i:..e ~, ... .-~ .- ...;. }",' <;..:t...-:. .:: ,.. , ."~ f', \ I) 83.300 S."'. ~ ,J:.~:;.,.;/:!'.'J' ,~/.;~.ti;..:..~...,~.... \ ' , \ I , J -4, @) --""..~ . ,/ 80,000 5,~. ':J~., -"..-.I 't.l '-/ " , " -,-/ .4:..!! , ~1 ' ,A r z~,.o ~:9-- ---.'":; ;, " , " , ,. r ....,,:,,\ .i": ,\, " '), 1 :> " ~ o j " :~ " I I I . , ."i , , .\ ~\, ~ ~ I ~I " '" if ,~/ "'/ -" -- -- I' '-, "FF:4,,: "f" h'~',:~.~;, .-,;.':: .- .~,)I J0" .-',.) "'..:' '. ,,),-,.,''': ;11', .' :(' 7' ;,,:.-: '" .,.... " . ,j . 'AHlf:"iiO:llZW AlTl:'l.All(.lN OR ,"POlllO" 10 Y:iiS SL'K\lH 15 A ViOl!'.TiON OF ; ::n;)~ 1:2'::9 2f Tni N~V' \':..::;.~ ::.:rATl .';:,'.riQN ~k,'>'. ,1:5 Of ,':",' ,',,'"'t ,.r,_""' '.~;i ,,''',\t'!'xa (';:.:.,:,,~:::o ,"'f. ~\.:-',lL j:VN );', [',r v,c~>/_ ~Hf ~'jot"'.. " ,~ ;', -' i ,." f r,') ;- ,-', ".i ',f/.," f-,'-~<c'C~ 1,"" ",::';'. '.': I' '"r H,:.\';<.)",( ".t-" , -""'- i.:::',:::r.!:';:r" ,,-,",.1 ; h';'--' ',:';1 c: ~'(," i " r"";v', ,.Ai " /" / l 0 C /'1 ,,', \?.... /Y~1~p . _ ~ ___ n .._______ Se;. BOO' = I" j~ o "fi'<. o\-~ ,. .~;. ...,. C'" flV.. t4 FJ .- J,;.;,'vl!V Jl,l;J ----.... . ,-'/MJ~iA4'~,,-/ ~ ",,: p., . 'Of''' ~, ~ . ~y... ---- -' -- 0..... v" ,~ \.1 psz.c;",-',.ses --- ----~~ .. ,~