Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-45.-7-2Southold, N.Y, 11971 (516) 765=1938 April 3, 1987 Mr. William H. Price, Attorney at Law 828 Front Street ~reenport, NY 11944 Jr. Re: Site Plan for William H. Price Dear Mr. Price: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, March 30, 1987. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, following field inspection, refer the site plan of William H. Price for construction of an addition on an existing building to the Building Department for certification, proposal located at Main Road, Greenport, site plan dated as amended February 26, 1987; subject to: 1. Evaluating the amount of parking proposed in relation to that needed and eliminating some in order to provide more landscaping. It was noted that the parking proposed was calculated on the entire building proposed, however, the calculations only require that the parking be calculated on the amount of office area. Enclosed is a copy of a in accordance with the above for your information. site plan condition, revised by the Planner which is submitted Would you please submit six (6) site plans of a revised site plan for our referral to the Building Department. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN RECE~VF.D BY- AUG 0 1987 DATE ATTORNEY AT LAW 828 FRONT STREET, RO. BOX E GREENPORT, N.Y. 11944 August 10, 1987 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Site Plan of William H. Price Gentlemen: Enclosed herewith please find revised site plan in the cap- tioned matter. The revision consists of a more exacting measurement of the actual floor area in the existing building and the proposed building. Specifically, the "dead storage space" has been deleted from the area calculation. This area has been excluded from the calculation because the existing building is constructed on a slab and, therefore, there is no basement which can be utilized for storage. Please be further advised that the areas which have been excluded could not be utilized as "office space". In accordance with the suggestion of your planner the existing easterly curb cut is proposed to be eliminated. We believe that the revised plan meets both the spirit and the specifics of your suggestions in respect to the necessary parking and the requested Twenty-five (25%) of landscaping. Please contact the undersigned with your comments and the date and time of the scheduled public hearing. Enc. 70.0 oc~T ~. TO: FILE FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner DATE: MEMORANDUM Continued Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 16, 1987 Mr. William H. Price, Jr. Attorney at Law 828 Front Street Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Proposed expansion of Price building on N/S of Route 25; 70' E/o Moore's Lane, Greenport Dear Mr. Price: After reviewing the file and your letter of April 27, 1987, the Planning Board determined that the site plan should be revised to include the following items: 1. 37 parking spaces 2. 25% landscaping Please submit six copies of the revised plans to the Planning Board office. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary BO:VS:dms ATTORNEY AT LAW 828 FRONT STREET, P.O. BOX E GREENPORT, N.Y. 11944 PHONS (516) 477-1016 April 27, 1987 RECEIVED BY Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Site Plan of William H. Price Gentlemen: You have requested an evaluation of the proposed parking to determine if some can be eliminated and additional landscaping in- cluded. I note that no suggested plan was included with your corre- spondence. The reason that the addition is going to be constructed is because of the need for additional space for the existing uses. There is no intention of expanding the number of uses. The law office is to be moved to the addition. There are currently three lawyers and three secretaries in the office. Our of- fice has become insufficient in size for any additional growth whatso- ever. When I first joined the office there were two lawyers and one secretary. That number of workers yielded an absolute need for three parking spaces for the workers at at times without consideration of clients. If one real estate closing took place a minimum of five ad- ditional parking spaces could be anticipated to be used. I calculate the need, in that instance, for an additional needed space for each of the following: the closer, the other side's attorney, the other side, my client, and the real estate broker. That is a conservative estima- tion of the need for additional parking for a closing. You can see that if two closings were being held in the office a minimum of ten spaces would be needed. While it was rare that two closing took place at the same time when there were two lawyers in the office, it now oc- curs more regularly because of the additional lawyer. Beyond the need for additional parking for clients, the new office has been designed to accommodate up to six secretaries and four lawyers. That, in and of itself, requires ten spaces for the law office use. The space that is now utilized by the law office will be used partially by the existing insurance agency and partially by the existing real estate office. The insurance agency has grown from hav- ing five employees to now having eight employees. The insurance agency needs and intends to expand its number of employees. While the insurance use does not usually have a large number of client's cars on ~\~ the premises at one time, it is not uncommon for there to be three or four insurance clients on the premises at any one time. The traffic flow into the insurance agency is relatively constant. This is espe- cially now true in that the State of New York requires that the agency take photographs of most of the automobiles it insures. The final use of the premises is a real estate office. That office now uses six to eight spaces for parking for salespeople and brokers on a regular basis. It cannot be said that the real estate office's main use of the parking occurs when the other uses are not open. Both the law office and the insurance agency are usually open on Saturdays. The law office employees a secretary who works each Saturday and I am working there almost every Saturday. There are times when the existing parking is not fully occu- pied. That usually occurs during midday when many of the employees have gone to lunch. By the same token there have been many times when the parking lot has been overcrowded to the extent that customers have had to park on'the south side of Route 25. We fully intend to maintain attractive and functional land- scaping. At your request we have promised to put barrier landscaping along the easterly boundary. This will allow our neighbors to avoid looking at our building and any of the parked vehicles and will allow us to avoid looking at the cars and boats stored in their back yard. It is also pointed out to the Board that we placed screening landscap- ing along the northerly boundary of the property without any requests from anyone which screens Jernick's parking lot from the view of the general public. I also point out to the Board that there is an acute parking problem within the Village of Greenport and its environs whereby most proposed new uses are unable to provide the necessary parking. I find it incongruous that we are being requested to eliminate parking area. Very truly William H. Price, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 25, 1987 Mr. William H. Price, Attorney at Law P.O. Box E Greenport, NY 11944 Jr. Re: Site Plan for William H. Price located at Greenport Dear Mr. Price: Please let this confirm the discussion at the regular Planning Board meeting of February 23, 1987 with regard to the above mentioned site plan. The planning consultant requested that the surveys be amended to indicate the drainage calculations based on a 2" rainfal~ as well as, screening along the easterly property line, (land of Shelby). The Planning Board will conduct a field inspection of the premises. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary o/ ~.51T E PL..Al',,/ FEB b~ 1987 DAT~ A~I~ORNEY AT LAW 828 FRONT STREET, P.O. BOX E GREENPORT, N.Y. 11944 PHONE (516) 477'1016 February 6, 1987 Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Site Plan for William H. Price, Tax Map No. 1000-045-7-2 Dear Diane: I have enclosed six (6) copies of the site plan in the above-referenced matter, along with Environmental Assessment form and the filing fee in the sum of $100.00. Please place this matter on the Board's agenda for review. William H. Price, Jr. WHP/sk Enclosures PART I NEW YORK DIVISION OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS ON J STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION PROJECT I.D. State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only Project Information (To he compJeted by Applicant or Project sponsor) William H. Price, Jr. Site Plan for William H. Pric~ 3. ~'ro~ctloc~uo~ 828 Front Street, Greenport ~.mc~pm~w Town of Southold ¢ounw of Suffolk [] New [] Expansion [] Mod~ficatiom/alJeratiorl $. D¢l£r,bepro~e¢~b~ieil¥: Addition of a one story office building measuring 49i x 40' with partial basement and additional parking all as per the attached site plan. See attached site plan for area map. [] Yes [] No If No, describe briefly [] Resident,al [] indus[rial [] Comme,cial [] AJ~ricuhure [] ?arklandJopen ,pace [] Other [~[Yes [] NO iJyes, lis~a§enc~s) andpermiUapp,oval$ : Building permit from the Town of Southold wi 11 ~ am H. Price. Jr'. 2/6/87 If th~ action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complote the I Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment I ' OVER A~I~ORNEY AT LAW 828 FRONT STREET, P.O. BOX E GREENPORT, N.Y. 11944 P~ONE (516) 477-1016 March 3, 1987 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Revised Site Plan for William H. Price Tax Map No. 1000-045-07-02 Dear Diane: I have enclosed six (6) copies of the site plan, which has been revised according to the Planning Board's request. Please have the revised site plan approved by the Board and delivered to the Building Department for certifica- tion. Very truly yours, William H. Price, Jr. WHP:kk Enclosures ( SITE PLAN ELEMENTS §100-134 Town Code Lot, block, and section number, if any, or the property taken from tax records Name and address of the owner of record Name and address of the person preparing the map Date, North arrow and written and graphic scale Sufficient description or information to precisely define the boundaries of the property. All distances shall be in feet and tenths of a foot. Ail angles shall be given to the nearest ten seconds or closer. The error of closure shall not exceed one in ten thousand. The locations, name, and existing width of adjacent streets and curblines The location and owners of all adjoining lands, as shown on the latest tax records Location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, setbacks, reservations, and areas dedicated to public use withinor adjoining property. A complete outline of existing deed restrictions or covenants applying to theproperty Existing zoning Existing contours at intervals of five or less, referred to a datum satisfactory to the Board Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflo Location of existing watercourses, marshes, wooded areas, rock outcrops isolated trees with a diameter of eight inches or measured three feet above the base of the trunk and other significant existing features. Location of uses and outlines of structures, drawn to scale on and within one hundred (100) feet of the lots. Paved areas, sidewalks, and wehicular access between the site and public streets Locations, dimensions, grades and flow direction of existing sewers, culverts and waterlines as well as other underground and above ground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Other existing development, including fences, landscaping and screening The location of proposed buildings or structural improvement The location and design ofall uses not requiring structures such as off street parking and loading areas. The location, direction, power and time of use of any proposed outdoor lighting or public address systems. The location of, and plans for, any outdoor signs The location and arrangement of proposed means of access and egress, including sidewalks, driveways or other paved areas; profiles indicating grading and cross sections showing width of roadway, location and width of sidewalks and lcoation and size of water and sewer lines. OVER... Site plan elements cont. (§100-134) Any proposed grading, screening and other landscaping including types and locations of proposed street trees. The location of all proposed waterlines, valves and hydrants and of all sewer lines or alternate means of water supply and sewage disposal and treatment. An outline of any proposed deed retrictions and/or covenants. Any contemplted public improvements on or adjoining the property. If the site development plan indictes only a first stage, a supplementary plan shall indicate ultimate develoment. Any other information deemed by the Planning Board necessary to determine conformity of the site plan with the intent and regulations of this chapter. I~',, .~ ,lB'.:', II!, ~,~..,.,: / _.. I