The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-45.-2-1 Garrett A. Strang • n' S = Architect Pb ✓L 1230 Traveler St., Box 1412 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (631) 765-5455 Fax (631) 765-5490 June 4, 2002 Gerald P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town of Southold Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: East End Marine Supply, 230 Corwin Street, Greenport,NY SCTM#1000-48-02-1 and 44.1 Dear Mr. Goehringer and Members of the Board: Pursuant to your letter of May 30, 2002 regarding Planning Board comments on the above referenced matter, I had an additional meeting with the Planning Board at their June 314 work session. At the conclusion of this meeting, the Board indicated that philosophically they could not be in favor of increased lot area over that which is allowed by zoning, but that this aspect is a zoning issue. However,they are sympathetic to the fact that failure to receive the relief requested from your board could force the existing business to relocate out of the area, thereby having a negative impact with regard loss of employment and a vacant building. There was also a comment with regard to the fact that the sought increase in lot coverage is minimal. Another concern is access for firefighting equipment on the south side of the building, which may be mitigated by the fact that the entire existing building is sprinklered. It was my understanding that the Planning Office will forward a letter outlining the above to your office prior to your June 6"' meeting and would appreciate your confirmation of receipt. Thank you for your courtesy in this matter. Very truly yours, Garrett A. Strang, R.A. Architect C: Planning Board 4 huh oS�EFOLIr JUDITH T. TERRY < Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK =v rZn P.O. Box 1179 rr .T. Southold, New York 11971 RECISrRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Fax (516) 765-1823 MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER 1 �� Telephone (516) 765-1801 � "'q!/ FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Detemmination of N/an Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Town Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O. Boa 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Date-- July 12, 1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617,of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8(State Environmental Quality Review)of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared Title of Action: Change of Zone on Town Board's Own Motion SCI'M#F 1000-45-2-1 s/s CR 48, 805 feet c/o Chapel Lane,Greenport SEQR Status: Type I Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves a the change of zone of 12 acres from"Hamlet Density"to'Residence4ff. Thepro ect site contains freshwater wetlands associated with toore's Woods (NYSDEC Freshwater Water Wetlands#tSO-1). The proposed project is one of six(6) change of zones being considered by the Town Board at this time in the same geographic area SCTM Number: 1000.42-2-1 Location: The site consists of 12 acres and is located on the south side of CR 48,805'east of Chapel Lane in the 'ND"Change of Zone SEQR Determination unincorporated portion of Greenport. Comments- The Town Board is reviewing this project simultaneously with the following applications: Change of Zone an Town Board's Own Motion SCIM#F 100040-31 s/s CR 48,more than 1000'e/o Chapel Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM#E 1000-40.41 s/s CR 48,400 feet w/o Moore's Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motu SCPM#u 1000-35.1-25 n/s CR 48,1,139 feet e/o Sound Road,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motu SCTM#c 1000-45-2.10..5 e/s Chapel Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motu SCl'M#t 100035-1-24 n/s CR 44,564 feet e%Sound Road,Greenport Reasons SaPpwdng This Determinationt lois determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of Significancenind and contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form II.and the following specific reasons: (1) The u4cot change of zoning does not cored any of the criteria for determining significance of an action that would warrant the preparation of a Draft EIS. Conversely,the action will minimize potential eaviroomental impacts thereby providing support for issuance of a Negative Declaration, (2) The proposed Project will reduce the potential development density on the subject site. As a result, density derived imps mdadin8 water use,sanitarY waste volume,disturbance of land,traffic generation;and solid waste generation wig also be reduced. Accordingly,the subject change of zomag a expected to reduce the impact of site development with regard to these impact areas,as compared to current zoning. (3) The Proposed zoning is consistent with land use and zoning of surrounding lands,and will therefore not cause a significant impact. As a result,the proposed change of zoning will have a beneficial impact upon land use in the area of the site. (4) Consideration has been given to the review of the proposed zone clange conducted by a consultant to the Town Board,which condudec the following with regard to the site in consideration of unique rite rcsourcesOur initial impression is is •R on this site wall have ficin increased d provide a significant increased mere Of protection for the environment than the*1117 zoning now provider. Page 2 of 3 •H11'Change at2;ma SEQR Determination (5) Consideration has bees given to a planning;documew pnpared by the Southold P Renew ofH Zoning in Southold Town-Report to the Tuan Board"dated February 1994. 7h�a report concludes ac following with regard to the site in condderaiton of unique site resources parr could be developed in a manner not requi+ingmuNPk denaig'user. to a/Darr deputy is rrcornrnended" Reronyg (6) contains�9�rices,and is occupied by freshwater wetlands over approsimet Jy 40 Percent of the L2 acre site. lxoPowd change of zoning will minimize impact wetlanda resources by reducing Me Potential land use density adjacent this habitat. In addition,the lower potential land use density will provide more flexible land use options to maxize setbacks and ensure preservation of unique babitat areas. For Further Information: Contact Person: Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold Address: Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone No.: (516) 765-1800 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation,50 Wolf Road,Albany,NY Regional Of'ice-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation, SUNY @ Stony Brook, Stony Brook,NY Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYS Legislative Commission onWater Resource Needs of Long Island Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Village of Greenport Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board John G. Siolas E Catherine Tsounis, 190 Central Drive, Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 Page 3 of 3 v, } PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Town Hall,53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. M� a * P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald ' "'� `•' �`� Southold, New York 11971 , � 3.� ''� '� Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards -_ - Telephone(516) 765-1938 June 27, 1994 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Judith T. Terry, Town C1OWN OF SOUTHOLD erk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mrs. Terry: Re: Change of Zone on Town Board' s Own Motion: SCTM # 1000-40-4-1 - J. Geier SCTM # 1000-35-1-25 - LBV Properties SCTM # 1000 Atl-2��,0. 3 - Richard Mohring (a.k.a. San Simeon SCTM # 1000-45-2-1 - Siolas1&ement Tsunisommunity Inc. ) SCTM # 1000-35-1-24 - Jem Realty SCTM # 1000-40-3-1 - KACE Realty At its June 24th meeting, the Planning Board adopted the following report: The Planning Board endorses the townspeople' s vision for their Town, which calls for individually distinct or discrete hamlets separated from each other by open or farmed countryside, and which calls for the equitable distribution of affordable housing density throughout the Town. The Planning Board also recognizes that achieving this vision will require the careful consideration of the land use within and adjacent to its hamlet centers; that the Town' s Zoning Map should the unity' s viion; anthat the Town emust tweigh 1the ncommunity' s t of the minterest ins sits collective future against the private interest of individual property owners in the use of their land. The Planning Board recognizes that the proposed rezoning of these properties will not deny these property owners the right or capacity to develop their land; that the proposed zone of R-80 is the base zoning of the Town and is by no means the most restrictive zoning categorization in Southold. The Planning Board endorses the report: "Review of Hamlet Density Zoning in Southold Town: Report to the Town Board" , and its recommendation that the zones of these six properties be changed from Hamlet Density to a lower density such as R-80 . Si cerely, Richard G994 Chairman oS�FFOLk��G JUDITH T. TERRY L Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK P.O. Box 1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Southold, New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER �- Fax (516) 765-1823 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER � 1 y ` Telephone (516) 765-1801 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER T OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non Sip fica= Determination of Significance LeadASemy. Town Board of the Town of Southold Address. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: May 31, 1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the impplementing re�cons pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review)of the EnvironmentafConservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Change of Zone on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 100045-2-1 s/s CR 48, 805 feet e/o Chapel Lane, Greenport SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves a the change of zone of 12 acres from"Hamlet Density"to"Residence-80". The Project site contains freshwater wetlands associated with Moore's Woods Pave 1 of 3 .HD-Change of Zone SEQR Determination (NYSDEC Freshwater Water Wetlands #SO-1). The proposed project is one of six(6) change of zones being considered by the Town Board at this time in the same geographic area. SC!'M Number: 1000-42-2-1 Location: The site consists of 1.2 acres and is located on the south side of CR 48,805'east of Chapel Lane in the unincorporated portion of Greenport. Comments: The Town Board is reviewing this project simultaneously with the following applications: Change of Zone on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 1000.40.31 a/s CR 48,more than 1000'c/o Chapel Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM#1000404-1 s/s CR 48,400 feet w/o Moore's Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM#1000-35-1-25 u/s CR 48,1,139 feet c/o Sound Road,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion. SCTM# 100045-2-103 e/s Chapel Lane,Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 1000-35-1-24 n/s CR 48,564 feet C/o Sound Road,Greenport Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of sigParrafficance and contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form II, and the following specific reasons: (1) The subject change of zoning does not exceed any of the criteria for determining significance of an action that would warrant the preparation of a Draft EIS. Conversely,the action will minimize potential environmental impacts thereby providing support for issuance of a Negative Declaration. (2) The proposed Project will reduce the potential development density on the subject site. As a result, density derived impacts including:water use;sanitary waste volume;disturbance of land;traffic generation;and solid waste generation will also be reduced. Accordingly,the subject change of zoning is expected to reduce the impact of site development with regard to these impact areas,as compared to current zoning. Page 2 of 3 "HD"Change of Zone SEQR Determination (3) The Proposed zoning is consistent with land use and zoning of surrounding lands,and will therefore not cause a significant impact. As a result,the proposed change of zoning will have a beneficial impact upon land use in the area of the site. (4) Consideration has been given to the review of the proposed zone change conducted by a consultant to the Town Board,which concludes the following with regard to the site in consideration of unique site resources: These findings suggest that any development on this site will have environmental impacts. Our initial impression is that rezoning to"R-W residential will provide a significant increased measure Of Protection for the environment than the"Mr zoning now provides. (5) Consideration has been given to a planning document prepared by the Southold Planning Staff entitled, "Review ofHamlet Density Zoning in Souuold Town-Repeat to the Town Board"dated February 1994. This report concludes the following with regard to the site in consideraiton of unique site resources: '77us parcel could be developed in a manner not reTtinng multiple density uses. Rezoning to a lower density is recommended" (6) The subject site contains unique resources,and is occupied by freshwater wetlands over apprmd ately 40 Percent of the 12 acre site. The Proposed change of zoning will minimiimpact upon wetlands resources by reducing the potential land use density adjacent this habitat In addition,the lower potential land use density will Provide more flw'ble land use options to maximize setbacks and ensure preservation of unique habitat areas. For Farther Information: Contact Person: Judith Terry,Town Clerk Town of Southold Address: Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Phone No.: (516) 765-1800 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation,50 Wolf Road,Albany,NY 12231 Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook,NY Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island Southold Town Planning Board ' Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Village of Greenport Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board John G. Siolas and Catherine Tsounis, 190 Central Drive, Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 Page 3 of 3 �S�FFOIK�� i 6 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK Town Hall, 53095 Main Road .= P.O. Box I 179 Ma REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Southold, New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER Fax (516) 765-1823 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER � 1 ` Telephone (516) 765-1801 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 20, 1994 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith map of of a proposed change of zone on the Town Board's own motion from Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District to Low Density Residential R-80 District on the property of John G. Siolas and Catherine Tsounis, located on the south side of Route 48, 805 feet east of Chapel Lane, Greenport, N.Y. Please prepare an official report with respect to the proposed change of zone, and transmit same to me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry (/ Southold Town Clerk Attachment L5 `r' I MAY 2 4199 TO1 S�EFOLk�. JUDITH T. TERRYO Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK N T P.O. Box;1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Southold, New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICERFax i RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER 0� 1 y ` Telephone (516) 7651801 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER T OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 11 , 1994 APR 1 3 1994 Lead Agency Coordination Request SOUTHOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1 . your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed you will find the Southold Town Board's findings and a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: John G. Siolas and Catherine Tsounis, 190 Central Drive, Mattituck, N.Y. 11952, SCTM #1000-45-2-1, property located on the south side of Route 48, 805 feet east of Chapel Lane, Greenport, N.Y. , containing 1 .2 acres. Requested Action: Change of Zone on the Town Board's own motion from Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District to Low Density Residential R-80 District. SEQRA Classification: Type I Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk, Town of Southold The lead agency will determine the need for a environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. If you have an interest in being lead agency, please contact this office immediately. If no response is received from you within 30 days of the date of this letter, it will be assumed that your agency has no interest in being lead agency. Page 2 Agency Position: [ 7 This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [X) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. [ l Other. (See comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very tr/uly,fyours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures Copies of this request and all attachments to the following: Commissioner Langdon Marsh, NYS-DEC, Albany RobertGreene, NYS-DEC, Stony Brook NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Board of Appeals. Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board (without attachments) John G. Siolas and Catherine Tsounis, 190 Central Drive, Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 Village of Greenport • S�EFOLKC 2 -L Town Hall, 53095 Main Road JUDITH CLERIC TERRY =v T P.O. Box 1179 g Southold, New York 11971 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICSJO``� Fax (516) 765-1823 RECORDMARRIAGE OFFICERS MANAGEMENT'OFFICER ��7Q1 ��O Telephone (516) 765-1801 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 5, 1994: OWNER PARCEL # 1000-45-2-1 PROPERTY LOCATION JOHN G. SIOLAS E South Side Route 48 CATHERINE TSOUNIS 805 Feet East of Chapel Lane 190 Central Drive Greenport, New York 11944 Mattituck, NY 11952 WHEREAS, the Master Plan of the Town of Southold and the recommendations of the Town's advisory Stewardship Task Force have increasingly emphasized the promotion of growth in and around the hamlet centers, to strengthen their business prospects while keeping open space and farmland undeveloped; and WHEREAS, the Town Board has examined and extensively discussed a report entitled "Review of .Hamlet Density Zoning in the Town of Southold" dated February 1994 which assessed the appropriateness of the zoning of all undeveloped HD zoned properties in the Town of Southold; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the Town Board of the Town of Southold concludes that HD zoning of this property is not appropriate for the following reasons: 1 . The parcel is only 1 .2 acres, which size does not lend itself to HD zoning; 2. The HD zoning of this site is not consistent with the Town's comprehensive plan because it encourages high density residential growth at a significant distance from the nearest hamlet center of Greenport and encourages suburban sprawl; 3. The HD zoning is not consistent with the parkland lying to the east and south; and a BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Southold finds that rezoning this property from HD to R-80 is appropriate for the following reasons: 1 . R-80 is the base zoning of the Town because it retains the open rural environment so highly valued by year-round residents and those people who support the Town's economy; 2. R-80 zoning is most consistent with the zoning on immediately adjacent properties; 3. R-80 zoning can best protect those areas with sensitive environmental features, including wetlands, far better than intense HD development; 4. R-80 zoning will best suit the property because it allows sufficient land in a parcel to handle the drainage problems which are associated with the heavy clay geology found on the' site; 5. Because of the small size of the site and the wetlands, both on the site and immediately to the east, only very limited development could take place on the site; 6. Rezoning to the proposed "11-80" density will provide significantly more protection for the environment than the "HD" zoning now provides. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk April 6, 1994 34-1b2 (21117)-7c • SEf7R 617.21 . Appendix A State Envlronmen4.r Quality Review .FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant.The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a projector action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 = Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment. there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Change of zone for SCTM#1000-45-2-1 Name of Action Town of Southold Town Board Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may ha-.c a significant effft; on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considers- as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Change of zone for SCTM#1000-45-2-1 I I LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) s/0 CR48 , 805 ' e/o Chapel Lane , Greenport NAME OF APPLICANTlSPONSOR ' Town of Southold Town Board BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS b16 ) 765-1891 53095 Main Road aTvrPo Southold STATE ZIPCODE NY 11971 NAME OF OWNER(II dlllerentl John G. Siolas & Catherine Tsounis BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS ( ) 190 Central Drive CITY/PO Mattituck STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION NY 11952 I Change of zone on Town Board ' s own motion . This is a 1 . 2 acre parcel located on County Route 48 , 805 ' east of Chapel Lane and is presently i zoned HD. Proposed change is to R-80 residential. Parcel contains approximately 1/2 acre of wetlands . Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban. ❑Industrial OCommercial OResidential (suburban) ORUral (non-farm) 29FOrest OAgriculture. 50ther Vacant 2. Total acreage of project area: 1 . 2 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Nor.-agricultural) Forested acres �_ acres . 72 acres • 72 acresAgricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) . 48 acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Ca , MfB , & MfC acres a. Soil drainage: OWell drained 10 % of site OModerately well drained 10 % of site OPoorly drained S0 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N' Land Classification System? NA acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) S. Approximate percentage of propose•oject site with slopes: 00.10% —AL__% 0141S% 10 % 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially con",uo,is to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Oyes ONo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural landmarks? Oyes QNo 8-38 ' + 8.-What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) (perched water on site � 4t 0 feet) . 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? CRYes ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes IENo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes (9No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) OYes tRNo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes Z)No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes ENo NA 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name DEC Wetlands # SO-1 b. Size (In acres) 180± acres 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Eyes ONo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑Yes $N o For HD zoning b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? EYes No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article B of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 617? =Yes JDhlo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? =Yes =No Unknown - Site contains past dumping of apparent house-hold trash. B. Project Description Proposed project is a rezoning. 1. Phvsical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 1 . 2 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: NA • acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped NA acres. d. Length of project, in miles: NA (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed NA %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing NA proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour NA (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: NA One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately 1 Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure NA height. width, length .,.. . .,.... .. .. � ,. 124+ 2. How much natural material (i.e.. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? tons cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? OYes ONO ®NSA a. If yes, for what intend , purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Oyes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OYes ®No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction NA months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: NA a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes ONO NA 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction NA after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project NA 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes ONO If yes, explain — 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes ONO a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ONO Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes 9)No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? OYes ®No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONO c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes ONO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ®No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month— b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes ®No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes ®No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? OYes ONO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? OYes ❑No If yes . indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity NA P 8 P gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day NA gallons/day. _. goes tiro-ect involve local State or Federal iundin�? eyes RNo Submittal 25, .*PP`rovals Required • TYPO Date City, Town. Village Board &Yes ONO Change of Zone City, Town, Village Planning Board OYes ONO City, Town Zoning Board OYes ONO City, County Health Department OYes ONO Other Local Agencies Oyes ONO Other Regional Agencies OYes ONO State Agencies OYes ONO Federal Agencies OYes ONO C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Eyes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: Nzoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision ❑site plan Onewlrevision of master plan Oresource management plan ❑other — 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? HD 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 1 unit without public sewer service/3 units with ublic sewer service R-80 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 1 unit 6ended uses in adopted local land use plans? MYes ONO . Is the proposed action consistent with the recomm 7 . What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/. mile radius of proposed action? Parkland/PD, Nursing home/HD. 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoiningisurrounding land uses within a '/.NAmile? $)Yes ONO 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed. a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? OYes ONO 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police. fire protection)? OYes ®No a', If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? '—Yes ONO 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? OYes ONo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? OYes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. -r 4trz �� i�M ' SSC Date Applicant/Sponsoolh, 71sltAlAr'f �1 TitleC'��"/��/ LLvnyeS�it�fJOC. ��drft2'i/a+t.7' �'L - Signaturee fifes/C4t 7� If the actior•. in a, and gnu ire a state jscncs. comolete the coastal Assetsmenl Form before proceedir, Part 2— DROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR, MAGNITUDE Rcsponslblllty of Lea/ Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and ':ta•minations be reasonablet The reviewer Is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significa= Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simr asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State a- for most situations. But for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropria for a Potential Large.impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The Impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative a. have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each questic • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of t impact If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but thresh.- is hresh.is lower than example, check column 1. _ d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moder= impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction Is not possible. Ti .must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact B IMPACT ON LAND _ Moderate Large Mitigated By 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?' Gitpac t Impact Pro}ict Chang ®NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc 3 feel • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. C) ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc • Construction on land',where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nr 3 feet of existing ground surface. *.Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑N, • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON, • Other impacts Action is a change of zone . No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc alteration of site will take place . 2. Will there be an effect t,. _.ry unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)QNO OYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N( 1 2 3 . Small to Potential Con Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Protect Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation ONOLaw. ECL) Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Developable area of site contains'a protected water body. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ protected stream. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Q ❑ QYes ONO Portion of the site contains fresh- • Other impacts: water wetland however , there will be no change with a change of z ne . 4. Will proposed action af7ect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ Dyes ONO • A 106 increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. ❑. Oyes ❑Nc • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ Dyes ❑N wetlands extend beyond NYSDEC ❑ ❑ • Other impacts: boundary S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater ®NO OYES quality or quantity? . Examptes that would apply tq column 2 ❑ ❑ Oyes ON • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ Dyes' ON • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ have approval to;serve proposed.(project) action. • Proposed Action requires water suPPh' from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON gallons per minute pumping Capacity. ❑ QYes ❑t • Construction or operation causing arty contamination of a water ❑ supply system. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑; • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ QYes ❑r • Liquid effluent will be conveyer;off the site to facilities wh;ch presently ❑ do not exist or have inadequate capacity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑, • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. O ❑ ❑Yes 0i • Proposed Action will likel• LaysP siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water :v th= e%:icnt that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. ❑ Oyes ❑ • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ products greater than 1,100 gallons. ❑ QYes ❑ • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ and/or sewer services. ❑ QYes ❑ • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. QYes • Other impacts: Change of zone action will not than e ❑ ❑ condition Development of proposed zone will reduce impact threat . 6. Will proposed action alster drainage flow or patterns, or surface I water runoff? ONO ®YES Exz r,Ples that would apply to column 2 -- ,-, ^yei [. I 2 , Small to Potential Can Impact tae Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 0. Other impacts: Poor soils are found on site ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ®NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO hou r. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed S lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? I.NNO OYES Examples that Mould apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yrs 'ONO list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-tfhreatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. _ IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard. etc.) • 2fn all to Potential ct Be Moderate Large By Impact Impact anQe • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ONO agricultural land. ❑ ❑No • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ofagricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District. more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. ❑ ONO • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? t@NO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ [Dyes ONO • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ or in sharp contrast to current surrounding (and use patterns, whether manmade or natural. ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ❑ ❑Yes ONO Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON, • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. ❑ ❑Yes ON • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ project site. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON • Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? EINO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑Yes ❑, ( )The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ Oyes Or t A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ • Other impacts: Site is immediately adjacent to ❑ ❑Yes ❑t park open space IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 2 a Small to Potential Can Impad 14. Will there be an effect to existing tr, sportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated ONO OYES Impact Impact Project Char Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑; • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑I • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑t• IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? R)NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑z- any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ Oyes D- transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ [Dyes ON NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES" Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). _ ❑ ❑ Oyes; ON • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local 0 ❑ Oyes ON ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ Dyes ON noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of.hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑t substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑t form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑t gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: 0 ❑ ❑Ycs 11 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potentlal Cart Impact Be OF COMMUNM OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By is. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change QNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services O 11 ❑Yes ONO will increase by more than S% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. O ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ O ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. O ❑ Oyes ONO • Other impacts: O ❑ ❑Yes ONO 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact($) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project chang= 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) • • Sc�BFi(-:r—Is CRAMER, VQ RHt i ;/{; SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS March 8, 1994 Ms. Valerie Scopaz F:IMG � � O Planner Town of Southold ,;==4Main Road Southold, New York 11971ARD RE: Proposal for Services Preparation of Long Environmental Assessment Forms (EAF) for Proposed Hamlet Density Zoning in the Town of Southold Dear Valerie: Pursuant to your request, the following will serve as a proposal for services with regard to the above referenced. It is our understanding that the Town Board wishes to consider the possible rezoning for six undeveloped parcels from Hamlet Density (HD) to Residence-80 (R-80). This proposed action is a result of the study prepared by you and the staff, entitled 'Review of Hamlet Density Zoning in the Town of Southold'; dated February 1994. The following are the six parcels that will be considered in the public hearings: SCTM# Hamlet Location Acreaee 100-40-3-1 Greenport, unincorp. 17.1 100-40-4-1 Greenport, unincorp. 10.55 100-35-1-25 Greenport,unincorp. 132.08 100-45-2-10.3 Greenport, unincorp. 20.07 100-45-2-1 Greenport, unincorp. 1.2 100-35-1-24 Greenport, unincorp. 62.3 CVA proposes to complete the Long EAF necessary for coordination with other involved agencies under the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) Act. We will also carry out field inspections on each of the subject parcels to assist in the preparation on the documents. It is also our understanding that you have certain information that will be made available to us to assist in the preparation of the Long EAF's. In consideration of the above we estimate that the preparation of each Long EAF will cost between $150.00 to $200.00, with a total sum of not to exceed $1,200.00. I hope you and the Board find the above proposal acceptable. If there are any questions with the above please feel free to contact me. If the Board authorizes this proposal, please let me know and we will begin work immediately as I understand that the public hearing will be set for March 22. Thank you for your consideration of CVA and I hope to hear from you shortly. Very truly,you s Thomas W. Cramer, ASLA 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Mir JUDITH T. TERRY Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK u i rn P.O. Box 1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTTCs Southold, New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1801 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 10, 1994 Thomas W. Cramer, ASLA Cramer, Voorhis E Associates 54 North Country Road, Suite 2 Miller Place, New York 11764 Dear Tom: This is to confirm that the Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on March 8, 1994, adopted a resolution accepting your proposal to prepare Long Environmental Assessment Forms for six proposed rezonings to be undertaken on the Town Board's own motion. A certified copy of the resolution is enclosed. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosure / cc: V. Scopaz, Senior Planner y p R A R 0 W 9 SO(1THOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD f GL t �G /JUDITH T. TERRYTown Hall, 53095 Main Road CLERK 1 rn P.O. Box 1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS y , , , Southold, New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER Fax (516) 765-1823 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER `; � Telephone (516) 765-1801 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER V OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 8, 1994: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby accepts the proposal of Cramer, Voorhis E Associates, dated March 8, 1994, at a total sum not to exceed $1 ,200.00, for the preparation of Long Environmental Assessment Forms for six (6) proposed rezonings to be undertaken on the Town Board's own motion. Judith T. Terr� Southold Town Clerk March 9, 1994 f i t A4. � nrto�,eJ " � o AZy v Aet .$0:5.D4 �'4r GIMats'sfiL�rt,R � , .LG � i aSAIJfi yrii'fdtO2T � � ` \� W t�Jtl'r-Bie Homs 4 h SOO ' f u �► �a ti aft IV f s OWLS OF r-WOpw&"Ty Ox 4,40N at Srcu a►ax �g arr <ScA E ' �Q t' T" i r obtltod AAril fz, If 94W. s� a pat r x MAY 2 41994 ,"*tjk ( LONti /SG ANO SJUNL' ATE eti /5 ROAn MA 1ti ROAD oR1� Z o h N j FLEET LeIA70E2 GO o � 1 GANOSCAPED BUFFER ' s \� N 12008'00°E 736.52 z �\ r' ,-.. �� '�' ALIANO —� ,, ,-�.. 4-�.�-- ',r� � ✓"' �., ._ -_✓�r `_� / PROPERTY \ _ PROPOSED W ' O_ � M07EL � �iRc ErJ PJKT HFI2BGR m ` oGFICE s o Z o LOCATION MAP I { \ a M„�, / � _ N � � Sll°26 '00' by 1E96/ COLLATE OES/G N' CORP � 1 N I I 25 \ W ("7- //" $TORE ) 1 _ O �} \ 549.10 1 026'00 W G A/JOSCAPED BUFFER FLOOD ZONE B - - FL000 ZONC E - - - _i5 �\ \ CPS LA . 7YP/CAL BUG/ O/N6 -/O UN/T�' HX CONSTRUCT/ON CORP. m \ MOO v SITE PLAN \ SCALE 1" = 40' SITE DATA SITE ARER = 3.70Ac = 16,1,15-115-F ALLOP/ABLE DEti/SITY= l(o 1,l87 = 40.3 (JNITB 5AY 40 Un//TS (MOTEL DENSITY .' 4000 REV/SED /Z//o/B(a - AOOED MOTEL OFF/CE *4000 SF PROPERTY REc,U/REO PER UN/T BECAUSE PUBLIC I'✓ATEP- e SEWER A✓A It.A6 LE TO S-1 r6. /�E✓/SED 9/// 86 TO N/OTEL DENS/ AL lA NO PROPERTY AT GREENPORT Steven J. Hyman, P.E. 31 E CARDINAL LAN HAUPPAUGE,DIN N.Y. 11788 NE Consulting Engineer (516) 361-6346 SCALE: / 40 ' DATE: JUNE 1986 PROD. No.: 86 -29 SHEET MENI SKETCH PLAN 1 OF I