Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-44.-3-1 ,'/ ;,.-:ORT ''lR.\1 ORDER -- · ~~~-v >'). I ~ /, I :, ,I I SlJPREME (GUn - ST,-\(.c: OF NEW YOR...rz TAP PART SUFFOLK COilliTY ,,'., r~CEX Ne. 89-3808 PRESENT: Hon. ROBERT W, DOYLE Iustice of the Supreme Court Motion Date 2/8/95 Adj. Dates 2114/95 Mot. Seq. #002 - MG: CASE JOHN XIKIS, x. P~aintiif. Esseks, Hefter & Angel, Esq Anorne'ls for Plaintiff L08 EaSt Main Stree: Post Office Box 279 Riyerhead, New York 1190 1 - against - De:e::Ca..'/'lts. L.:lUry 1. Down, Esq. Southoid Town Anome'/ Anorne'l for Defe:Jdanci Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New Y or:{ 11971 TOWN OF SOuTrlOLD and PL.~'iNING BOA.:.'-D of the TOW"N OF SOUTHOLD, ~ " 0';::0:1 tbe .:ollcwi.:lg' ,gape.:"s :11.:::ti:e:sc. 1 't= il read. on ::::'':'5 mc~..:..cn :or su;, ;uccment OU~3uan~ t= C~t~ 32:2j ~o~..:..=a c: ~c~icn/Or=e: to Shc~ Cause anc su;;o, pape:s 1 - 24j Nc~..:..ca 0: c=oss ~c~..:..cn ar.c $~;;c~i~g ?a~ers ____i Ans~e=~~g A::..:..c. and su;po=~inq ?a;e:s 25 - 45; ~e;ly~=g A=:..:..=avits and 5U?;C=~..:..=g papers ____i ( 46 - 47 j (___...: _':'___ ----.--- --- ------- "-- -:.- ..._-.:.._.~) i': is, ORlJERED that this motion by the defe:JC!a.1cs for summary judgment in their favor is gI" In this action plaintiff seeks a judgment (1) de::!aring that the defe:Jdant Planning : purposefully delayed reYiewmg his site plan appiicacton until such time as the adoption of a z. amendment re:Jdered the proposed use of his property unlawful; (2) inv-.Jidating Local Law No. 1989 insofar as it purports to rezone plaintiff's property from B-Light Business to R-80 Reside:Jtia declaring that plaintiff has a vested right to develop his property in accordance with the site submitted in March of 1987; and (<I.) directing the defendants to process his application unde provisions of the zoning code in effect prior to FebrJary t, 1989, The documentary evidence submiLtedQn the motion establishes the following undisputed i On or about March l6, 1987, plaintiff, through an al'chitect, made application to the Planning :_ for approval of construction of an ll, 000 square fcot re:ail complex on a 2.8-acre parcel on C, Route 48 in the Town of Southold. At the Board's reauest for revisions and additional informa three sets of revised plans were sub mined, the last bei;g on Oc:ober 27, 1987, Tne following October 28, the Board initiated the process of re'new mandated by the State E:Jvironmemal Ql Review Act (SEQR.A.) by forwarding a copy of the application co other age:Jcies, including the Su County Depe Of Health Services (DHS), for their comme:Jts. The cover lener specifies ti -. . '. Xikii v Town of SouthaM ill/Ie:: No. 89-.'1808 , p,lJ:e .. ~ O}llrdinated review was contemplated; it further indicates that the Planning Board was assuming lead ag':nC'j starns, had classified the proje<:: as "unlisted" and had made an "initial de:e:mination of nf}llsignific:mce. " The response from the DHS, =eived by the Planning Board on November 17, 1987, indicates tll,lt it did not have sufficie:u information about the projec: to do a "complere te<:hnica! review" and that it Ilad "no =ord of an application to this Department." On De<:ember 14, 1987, the Board sent a cOPy or the DHS letter to John Be.--:ani, a builder who, in conjunction with the architect, was acting on pl;lintiff's behaif, and requested "that an application be made to the health department for approval of till: proposal by that agency prior to fun:her review by the Planning Board." Plaintiff submitted an application to DHS on June 13, 1988. By December 5 of that year, when pl.untifr~s attorney appe:lI'ed at a medng of the P!anning Board to ask that the site plan be approved, t/l': DHS application was still being "processed." During the meeting a Board member, Ricl1ard Ward, sl;lted that the Board's "preference for this site is :esidential" in keeping with the "comprehensive plan ul'dare" and that there were "serious reservations about this site for commercial" use. Ward then moved tli:lt a positive declaration be made under SEQRA be--..:mse of the proje<:t's inconsiste:1cy ...ith the master plan and "the traffic situation." A formal positive declaration was issued on December 16, 1988; it idC::1tifies "tr-..ffic impac~" and "adverse effec:s ... to the groundwater resource" as the e:1vironmenra! cllllseque:1ces of most immediate concer:!. Additional evide:1ce. in the form of decosition testimony and affidavits, demonsU<.tes that in loJ85 the Planning Board had :eccmmended thai ;:b.e Town Board 'adopt an updated mas,e:- pian and new zuning map. On December 1, 1988, the Town Board held a public hearing on the new plan and zoning cude; subsequemly they were adopted by the e:1aC:lnent of a local law on January la, 1989. As of the crfe<:::ive date of the amended zoning code, February 1, 1989, re:ail stores were no longe:- pe:mitted on plaintiff s prope~ and the Planning Board took no furJ1e:- action on his application. Plaintiff comme:1ced, then withdrew, an Article i8 proceeding; the instant declaratory judgment at:tion was subseque:1dy comme:1ced. The issues raised on the summary judgme:1t motion are two: (1) whether the Planning Board complied with the procedures, in particular, the time constraints, set forth ill the SEQR regulations (6 NYCRR Pan: 617), and (2) whether plaintiff is entitled to the "special facts" c:~ception to the general rule that a coun: must apply the law as it exists at the time of its decision. An action is subject to review under SEQRA if any state or local agency has the authority to illsue a discretionarf pe:mit, license or other type of approval over that action. The review process bcgins with the age:1cy that first =eives an application. Where other agencies are involved and a coordinated review is undertake:1, the re<:eiving' age:1cy must, as soon as possible, mail a copy of the application to all involved agencies, notifying them that a lead agency must be agreed upon within 30 c;ue:1dar days of the mailing (g 617.6[c][1]). Once the lead agency is established, it must "determine tJle:: significance of the action within 20 calendar days of its establishment..." or within 20 days of its rcceipt of "all information [t may rensonabiy need to make the determination of significance..." (~ 6 17.6[c] [2]). Here, as no other involved agency objected, the Planning Board's starns as lead agency became final on November 27, 1987. Tnat dare also marks the beginning of the 20-day period ror ma.ldng a . - = - = . ,r " Xikis v Town of SouthaM Index No. 89-8808 Page 3 determination of significance, unless the Board reasonably needed additional information. Tnis question is complicated by the fact that the SEQR process is, according to the Board's Senior Planner Valerie Scopaz, "integrated with" the procedures for site plan review set forth in the Town Code. The Code requires ce..'"tain elements to be included in a site development plan (9100-134), including, under sub-section C(3) "loc:uions...of e.'cisting sewers, culverts and waterlines...within and adjace..'1t to the property,' and under sub-section D(7) 'location of all proposed waterlines, valves and hydrants and of all sewer lines or alte.""llate means of water supply and se'Nage disposal and treatment." As these aspeas of a development are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Health Department, the Planning Board has a 'policy' of not approving a site plan 'until and unless all requisite Health Deparone.'1C approvals" have been obtained, thereby ensuring that the proposed development will comply with the Suffolk County Sanitary Code with resp= to water supply and sewage disposal. , Correspondence be!Ween plaintiffs attorney and the Planning Board during October and November of 1987 reve:lls that in attempting to C"JII'j out an 'integrated" review, the Board equated the "comments' solicited from DES for the purpose of making a determination of significance with the information the DES "technical review" would Yield to enable further action on the site olan aoolication As lead agency the Board was obliged to ma.1(e 'a determination of significance within a prescribed tim~ period (there is no provision in the regulations for an 'initial" or preliminary determination of "nonsignificance'), based upon information already had and input from other involved agencies. The regulations do not limit the pe..-iod of time for responding to a lead agency's request for" comments"; however, there is a gene:-..! rule that all agencies "shall" act with 'minimum procedural and administrative delay" and 'shall e.-cpedite all SEQR procAAdings in the interest of prompt review" (9617.3(11). Hence a lead agency may not wait indefinitely for "comments" from other involved agencies before making a dete..'1TIination of significance. Although the Planning Board could have issued the SEQR determination as early as December' of 1987, the end result would probably not have been any different. That is, because of its policy, site plan approval would have been withheld until the necessary approvals were obtained from the D t;;:S. This brings the discussion to the issue of whether' special facts" are present to demonstrate that the town authorities acted in bad faith and unduly delayed acting upon plaintifr"s application while they amended the zoning ordinance. In this conne..."ti.on it is noteworthy that even in the absence of bad faith, negligent or willful administrative procrastination of sufficient ma"anitude affords a basis for applying the pre-existing regulation to the application (Amsterdam-Manhattan Associates v Joy, 42 NY2d 941, 397 NYS2d 1000, 1001 [1977]). A municipality may be estopped from claiming the benefits of its own inaction, whether intentional or merely negligent (Faymor Development Co., Inc. v Board of Standards and Appeals of cuy of New York, 45 NY2d 560, 410 NYS2d 798, 801 [19781). However, the coun finds that the "special facts" exception does not apply in this case. Assuming, arguendo, that the site plan in its final revision conformed to the then-existing zoning regulations, and, so as to cast the most favorable light possible upon the plaintifI"s case, assuming further that the Planning Board were persuaded to abandon its policy in order to approve the site plan, plaintiff still would have had to apply for a building permit. No building permit would have been issued without prior 'approval of water supply and sewage disposal systems by the DES. All the evidence -' , . . ~ Xikis V Town of SouthoM Inde:; No. 89-8808 Page 4 indicates that the delay in this matter was due to plaintiff's initial proc:astination application to DES and subsequently in its processing. in submitting an . An additional factor to be considered in this regard is that plaintiff was aware from the Outset that his property was slated for rezoning to reside:ltial use. As early as April of 1987, during informal discussions with members of the Planning Board, plaintiff's represe."1tatives had been advised that the proposed retail. development was counter to the new master plan. Plaintiff's builder even c:une forward with a rough sketch for a reside."1tial development, and the Board was willing to approve a higher density than the new zoning map would pe:mit. The plaintiff chose to pursue the retail development rather than residential. Th~,.,~tiff ~q~ ..\<Wm. tl\<l~ he was misled ~g lJip.c;ie.,"lXl by Bo'lrd membifS (see, Marter of Alaimo v Town of Greece, 68 AD2d 743, 418 NYs21! 492, 494 [4th Dept 1979]) or that the delay was due to the Board's arbitrary actions in processing the application (Marter of Hu1ltin.gton Ready-Mi:: COllcrete, Inc. v TowlZ of Southampton, 112 AD2d 161,491 NYS2d 383 [2d Dept 1985j). Moreover, "persons who own prope.."'ty in a particular zone or use dismct enjoy no eternally vested tight to that classmcation" (McGowan v Cohalan, 41 NY2d 434, 393 NYS2d 376, 379 [1977]); and, llI1less in reliance upon the zoning ordinance substantial work has been commenced prior to its ame."1dmenr, an owner cannot claim a vested right in the original ordinance (Alaimo v TowlZ of Greece, supra, 418 NYS2d at 494). Accordingly, the COUrt grants summary judgmenr :0 the derendants and dedares that 1) the Planning Board did not purposefuily or maliciously delay approval of plaintiff s site plan application for the subject property; 2) the Town of Southold's Local Law No. 1 of 1989 is valid; 3) the plaintiff does not have a vested right to use his property for retail stores in accordance with his sire plan application of March, 1987. In view of the above declarations, the further relief demanded is denied. Dated:)kd~M ~ , Iff5 //-;:? ./'/IC\ I //~ ll~tL /-f;' IS.C. ! ~" (j -------- . .0 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK -----------------------------------------------------------------------)( JOHN )(IKIS, Pi!> .s~ FtG&' ~ Plaintiff, INDE)( NO. 89-8808 -against- AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REARGUMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD and PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, Defendants. ---------------------------------------------)( Laury L. Dowd, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am an attorney at law and represent the defendants, members of the Southold Town Planning Board, in the above-captioned action and make this Affidavit in opposition to the relief requested by Plaintiff in the Order to Show Cause dated April 21, 1995 along with the Support Affirmation of William Esseks dated April 20, 1995. 2. The Order to Show Cause requests relief to reargue under CPLR 2221. 3. In an Order of the above-titled case dated March 20, 1995, the Court granted summary judgment, concluding that: 1) the Planning Board did not purposefully or maliciously delay approval of plaintiff's site plan application for the subject property; 2) the Town of Southold's Local Law NO.1 of 1989 is valid; 3) the plaintiff does not have a vested right to use his property for retail stores in accordance with his site plan application of March, 1987. 4. Pursuant to CPLR 3212, summary judgment can be granted where there are no questions of fact. Logically, there is no need for a trial to hear q of fact illrm @JE D W ~@! 1 :Lh'. APR 28 i995 .. ." where the facts are agreed. This case does not involve a dispute of facts, but a dispute of how the law applies to established facts. This issue may properly be resolved in a summary judgment. 1 5. Plaintiff calls for this rehearing on the grounds that there are significant ques- tions of fact in this case that the Court has misunderstood. This motion is opposed on the ground that the "questions of fact" which Plaintiff tries to raise are immaterial to the disposition of this case. They are not material factual questions because, even if they were resolved in a way entirely favorable to Plaintiff, they would not support Plaintiffs claims under the law.2 The logic of the Court's decision stands firm, even with Plaintiffs interpretation of the facts. The decision specifically gives the facts the con- struction sought by Plaintiff, and decides against him. 6. Plaintiff claims there is a question of fact as to whether the Planning Board had a "policy" of seeking Health Department comments prior to issuing an environmen- tal determination. In its decision the Court clearly states that it did not use the conclu- sion as to "policy" to decide the special facts question. The ruling states that: The Court finds that the 'special facts' exception does not apply in this case. Assuming, arguendo, that the site plan it its final revision conformed to the then- existing zoning regulations, and so as to case the most favorable light possible upon the plaintiffs case, assuming further that the Planning Board were persuaded to abandon its policy in order to approve the site plan, plaintiff still would have had to apply for a building permit. No building permit would have been issued without prior approval of water supply and sewage disposal systems by the DHS. All the evidence indicates that the delay in this matter was due to 1 Carden Hall. Inc. v. Abidor (1959) 18 Misc2d 584; Marinas of the Future. Inc. v. City of New York (1982) 87 AD2d 270, 278 2 Nidds v. Procidano (1983) 95 AD2d 912 states "only the existence ofa bona fide issue raised by evidentiary facts and not one based on conclusory or irrelevant allegations will suffice to defeat a motion for summary judgment." 2 . .. plaintiffs initial procrastination in submitting an application to DHS and subsequently in its processing. 7. Plaintiff also tries to create a factual dispute about whether the project could have obtained Health Department approval by claiming that the project "could" meet Health Department criteria. In fact, the project did not obtain Health Department appro- val. Speculation as to whether the project "could" obtain Health Department approval is fruitless and irrelevant to the disposition of the case. 8. Plaintiff was precluded by Town code from obtaining a building permit until County Health Department approval was obtained. Plaintiff does not dispute the fact that he did not have Health Department approval. The absence of Health Department approval is an independent cause for Plaintiffs failure to vest prior to a change in the ordinance. Thus, Plaintiffs failure to obtain Health Department approval an indepen- dent reason for his failure to vest his project, and absence of site plan approval is not a basis for claiming relief under the special facts exception. 9. The decision of the Court is correct inasmuch as, even if Plaintiffs position is accorded full belief, Plaintiff fails to establish that he could or did obtain a vested right to proceed with the project after the zone was changed. The special facts exception lies to grant relief when an applicant is precluded from vesting by inappropriate town con- duct. There is no material factual dispute as to Town conduct. Town conduct did not preclude Plaintiff from obtaining a building permit and vesting before the change in the Town's Master Plan. The Court correctly points out that Plaintiff knew of the proposed 3 e e. Master Plan changes during the entire application period and that Plaintiff chose to pro- crastinate in pursuing development 10. There is no substantive or procedural reason to modify the Order of this Court dated March 20, 1995. WHEREFORE, your deponent prays for an Order denying the Motion to reargue the grant of summary judgment Sworn to before me this ~ ~d day of April, 1995. ~d~ Notary Public HELENE D. HORNE Notary Public. State of New York No. 4951364 Qualified in Suffolk County 7"5- Commission Expires May 22, 19_ 4 .. e. STATE OF NEW YORK) ss: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Ruthanne Woodhull, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That the deponent is not a party to the action and is over the age of 18 years, and resides in Mattituck, New York. That on the 28th day of April, 1995, deponent served the within Affidavit in Opposition to Motion for Reargument upon: Esseks, Hefter & Angel Attorneys for Plaintiff P. O. Box 279 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901 by depositing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a wrapper ad- dressed as shown above, into the custody of the United States Post Office. ~ff/lIAt.e- tJ~LdL hanne Woodhull Sworn to before me this 28th day of April, 1995. ~u!:tc C0kU~~ JOYCE M. WILKINS Notary Public, State of New Yort No. 4962246. Suffolk Counw Tem ExpiresJun812.1~ . -. LAURY L. DOWD Town Attorney ,. ,., .);"ire~.r ":~,\. .,' 1(1') ". . ";;l- '7 .~ ;1. \'-. ~ ~ ,'J '~~' \ " ,:':: ~., :::i: ,d ~.~ ,1". I' ' . -;. !:lJ\)' ;.-' <~)',. p<!:-' ,"',:-..i)' "~:., .~,~...r'S"J~Y '_.! 1 '.,!J> -,0" ,-,- .--'/:::>7:.;rJ-':'-~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516)765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTH OLD MEMORANDUM TO: VALERIE SCOPAZ DICK WARD BENNIE ORLOWSKI LAURY DOWD l/:~ XIKIS V. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FROM: RE: DATE: DECEMBER 7, 199~ The trial on this matter has been tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, January 17. Please do not make firm commitments to other matters in this week. I say that this date is tentative, because it depends on the court having a judge and courtroom available to hear this matter. If none is available, it may be rescheduled. I don't need to have you in court, merely available by telephone so that I can call you when you are needed to testify. This case is set for a court trial, meaning that there will not be a jury, only a judge. I have reviewed all your depositions and will be meeting with you in the next few weeks to review your testimony. The major question will be whether the Planning Board acted in bad faith in wilfully holding up site plan approval while the property was rezoned. Mr. Xikis has the burden of proving that: -he had fully complied with the requirements -proper action on the permit would have given him time to acquire vested rights (to pull a building permit and do substantial building work) -the Planning Board's reasons for delaying review are unreasonable or unjustifiable -the Planning Board showed administrative procrastination calculated to deny a property owner his right to use his land, supportable neither by law nor by sound and ethical practice You will be called on to testify in a way that explains away each of the above points. Please keep your calendars open, and I'll be talking to you soon. 's1;001 SOUTHOui TOWN PLANNING BOARO Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 . ~~C ;.'" , r f" l; -~___ ., c.\lr r cu, I'> /;;r;.~"Ij,-_"I'~ La ~- 'Y:~.'" ' " ~ J',:::::., -< ':=:t." . ,'=;l : a: 'I ,.,., cJ"l. .';IF ~ .... ,,~ ~OJ '1-'~ . PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 16, 1988 Stephen R. Angel Esseks, Hefter & Angel P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: John Xikis SCTM *1000-44-3-1 Dear Mr. Angel: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 5, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board make a determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act of significance (see the attached Positiv~.Declaration). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. plY YOu:s/} / /? t<';;~ttp/-0tA~ ./} BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. ~ CHAIRMAN enc. jt Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 · 'JPI-~ ;'U ~~~_ ....:., ..Y"'~'\rrj,fl Y "';;' .,;.r:i)' ..I1....:.:.~:.<~ I ia %. ,'j = .;1 r~{ -._ '~ ~ " ~'j -:!\' f-7; ~.1 ~;.t'!ili i... . ~, ~J1tlJj :~ .}.'O~ , . PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 12/16/88 POSITIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR part 617, Section 617, Section 617.10 and chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency for this unlisted action described below has determined that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The site plan for John Xikis located on the South side of Middle Road, Southold. SCTM #1000-44-3-1. The project has been determined to have a significant effect on the environment for the fOllowing reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The specific impacts of immediate initial concern are traffic impacts. Other adverse effects may occur to the groundwater resource. Further information can be obtained by contacting Jill M.Thorp, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. Copies mailed to the fOllowing: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk county Planning Commission NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Thomas C. Jorling, DEC Commissioner Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department -CONTINUED- Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Applicant Planning Board . . . . December 5, 1988 meeting Mr. Or10wski:John Xikes- Board to discuss this application with the applicant. This site plan is located at Arshamomoque. SCTM #1000-44-3-1. Mr. Angel: Besides myself(Steven Angel), this is Robert Lawless, he is the Architect for the site plan. Mr. Orlowski: Do you have some questions? Mr. Angel: Not really. I think our position is outlined in our letters, sent back and forth to the Board. I can summarize them for you. Mr. Orlowski: Would you do that? Mr. Angel: What we have here, is an application that was started with a site plan. I guess he submitted an application about twenty months ago. There were, I believe two sets of revisions and two different revised plans were submitted. There was some correspondence. I wrote the Board on October 19th in accordance with your regulations and summarized briefly what had transpired in this application as far as I could tell from looking at your file and speaking to Mr. Lawless. Then requested approval in accordance with the previsions, I guess in Section 100-133 of your code. Which starts the time running for you on site plan applications similar to the time frames on subdivision. I got back a letter from the Chairman dated October 27th, which I believe it says there has been no SEQRA review on the application. Even though it has been pending for nineteen months and refers to the necessity of a Health Department application to complete SEQRA review. I commented on that on November 7th. I took the position in that I did not understand why you needed detailed application to the Health Department to make an initial SEQRA determination. Than I appeared here on November 14th in conformance to my original self invitation. And then on the 14th you suggested that we come back on the 5th of December. And we are back here, to deal with any questions you might have with the site plan. I asked Mr. Lawless to come out from Yonkers so that he can discuss any particular details. I have reviewed the application and it seems to be conforming under the provisions of the B-light Business District. It has been kicking around for . . quite some time. It has, apparently, been a low priority item. Our client, however, does not consider it a low priority item and would like it to be expedited, so that he can proceed. Mr. Ward: We basically have had a problem in reviewing this because our preference for this site, I realize the current zone is Commercial, our preference for this site is Residential. Our comprehensive plan update is to identify with zones to residential. I would recommend tonight, if you want to peruse this, is to positive dec. it for traffic and other reasons. And put it into that remedial. We have serious reservations about this site for commercial. I just want to say where we are coming from. I realize you have a right. It is a property ownership, but in terms of the overall Town there is a sore point to it, that it is commercial. Mr. Angel: But, with all do respect, we have had a conforming application before you for nineteen months, to make a initial determination, well twenty months, of a positive declaration under SEQRA when it conforms to all the requirements of legislative zoning. The Board can't do that. It has been like that for some time. I think it would be an arbitrary act. It would just unnecessarily delay our client. It is ascentially a simple application. It may be that you do not agree with the zoning. You are sort of stuck with it, currently. Mr. Ward: I think we have to address the impact statement as to what is happening. Mr. Angel: My position is pretty well taken. I don't want to band any threats back and forth, but you understand my position. Mr. Ward: Yes, I do. Mr. Angel: A positive declaration, a situation where you have public water. The Health Department says it meets all their requirements and it conforms to everything in your zoning ordinance. It was chosen for this particular purpose. It could turn out to be a dangerous act on part of the Town. Mr. Orlowski: Do you have Health Department approval? Mr. Angel: No. We have an application pending with the Health Department. Mr. Orlowski: O.K. What is the pleasure of the Board? Mr. Angel: For the regard I renew my request for approval in accordance of my letter of October 19, 1988. Mr. Ward: I move that we have a positive dec. under SEQRA. Basically, it is inconsistant with our long range planning and also the fact that the traffic situation should be looked at under SEQRA. ~ . Mr. Angel: Who seconded it? You are waiting for Mr. Mullen to come back? Mr. Orlowski: Yes. Mr. Mullen, there is motion on the floor on the John Xikis site plan to positive dec. it. For reasons that it is inconsistent with the adopted master plan by this Board and the traffic situation. We have a motion made and seconded? Mr. Latham: second. Mr. Mullen: I concur. Mr. Orlowski: All those is favor? vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. Mr. Angel: You are putting something in writing. Mr. Orlowski: Yes. Mr. Angel: Thank you. Good night. , . ~ ~~'~;... r.. " ~ ;'J-\I - '1 \" i-..",_ ~ ~ r".~ ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSEL.ORS AT LAW loa EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERI-IEAO, N.Y. I r 901 WI LLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. HEFTER STEPHEN R. ANGEL (516) 369-[ 700 JANE ANN R. KRATZ JOHN M. WAGNER WI LLlAM POWER MALON E'T' TELEX-EHCA 6852318 UW TELECOPIER NUMBER (516) 369-2065 P. O. Box 570 WATER MILL, N.Y. [1976 (516) 726-6633 ALAN D. OSHRIN OF COUNSEL November 7, 1988 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Planning Board, Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site plan for John Xikis located on the south side of Middle Road, Southold SCTM# 1000-44-3-1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: I have written this letter in response to your letter of October 27, 1988. As I read your letter, you take the following positions: 1) that the Planning Board has not made an initial SEQRA determination; 2) that the Department of Health Services ("Health Department") has not received an application from our client; 3) that you are awaiting Health Department comments before issuing your determination; and 4) that the Health Department somehow needs our application before it can issue such comments. With all due respect, I do not understand your letter. Our review of the file shows that at the time the application was submitted in March of 1987, a short environmental assessment form was filed on behalf of the applicant by Robert E. Lawless, his architect. On October 28, 1987, you stated, in a letter to the DEC, that "an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made" in connection with this matter. A copy of your letter to the DEC was sent to the Health Department and other agencies. The Health Department replied on November 16, 1987. Its reply ~ . . ~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman November 7, 1988 Page Two simply acknowledged that it had not received an application from our client and that .complete technical review. of the project would have to await the application. This same reply stated, moreover, that the project could be served by sub-surface sewage disposal systems. Thus, as early as November 1987, you were aware that the project met Health Department standards. I must assume by your letter that you are either 1) misin- terpreting the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA _ Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law) or 2) attempt- ing to delay this application. I have never been faced with a request that an applicant make a detailed application to the Health Department prior to initial SEQRA review by a Planning Board. SEQRA review has to be started at the inception of the project. Moreover, the file maintained by your Board indicates that you reviewed this site plan application, that Health Department standards were met, that you made suggestions to the applicant and his architect, and that the site plan was amended to reflect your suggestions. Certainly, this, coupled with your statement that an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made, would indicate that, as far as you were concerned, SEQRA compliance had been completed. To argue otherwise would require you to take an arbitrary position which would damage my client. More than 19 months have passed since this application was submitted. It is fully conforming. It has been reviewed. There is no reason, other than delay, to contend that an initial SEQRA determination has yet to await further review by the Health Department. For your information, however, the Health Department application was, in fact, filed for this project on or about June 13, 1988 (Application No. CIO-88-007). It is my current understanding that the Health Department is processing the application. . . . , Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman November 7, 1988 Page Three You should note that several of Mr. xikis' representatives were told by employees of the Town of Southold that the Town was not in favor of this application, but that the property should be rezoned for residential purposes. Should I conclude that the positions taken in your letter of October 27th are part a Town policy to delay this site plan approval and, during the period of delay, alter zoning? As I am sure you are aware, it would be illegal for the Town to have such a policy. I strongly suggest that this matter be placed back on track, that a negative declaration be prepared, if one has not been prepared as yet, and that on November 14, 1988 you approve the site plan. SRA:mb Respectfully yours, ~l-- ~~/U STEPHEN R. ANGEL cc: Robert Lawless John Xikis Roy Haje . . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 27, 1988 Stephen R. Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Site plan for John Xikis located on the south side of Middle Road, Southold. SCTMi 1000-44-~-1 Dear Mr. Angel: The Planning Board reviewed your letter of October 19, 1988. The Board would like to clarify their previous letter of December 14, 1987. The Planning Board, as Lead Agency, before making a determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), asks for comments from various agencies, one of which is the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. The Planning Board received a response from the Health Department stating that they had no record of an application. The December 14th correspondence, which was addressed to John Bertani, was a request for an application to be made to the Health Department so ~hat the Health Department would be able to Comment appropriately to the Planning Board. To clarify Number 7 of your correspondence, the Health Department awaits a determination by the Planning Board under SEQRA, not a determination on the final site plan. Contact has been made by the Planning Board with the Health Department to inquire as to whether or not the Health Department wishes to make any comments pertaining to a SEQRA determination. A determination under SEQRA will be forthcoming when the Health Department receives a ~9mp1~te application from your client thereby enabling them to respond to our request for comments. . . Once the SEQRA determination is made, the Planning Board will proceed with their review of the site plan. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. L." ery tr1f.IY,Y-~rs!? .. /)/ L<: ; /' ..'/ // c<- _1.<'/t/;t%fFUtJ~i '~-. . BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN cc: Dept. of Health Services ms ..~- ~ l~ 0 \YI rn rn W'LLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. HEFTER STEPHEN R. ANGEL ESSEKS, HEf'TER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAl N STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAO, N.Y. 11901 (516) 369-1700 ...JANE ANN R. KRATZ JOHN M. WAGNER WI l..L.lAM POWER MALON EY TEL.EX-EHCA 6852318 UW TELECOPIER NUMBE:R (516) 369-2065 C=T 2 O. ~i)UTHOLO TOWN f'LANNIN WATER MILL OFFICE MONTAUK HIGHWAY P. O. Box 570 WATER MILL, N.Y. It 976 (516) 726-6633 ALAN D. OSHRIN OF COUNSEL October 19, 1988 Planning Board, Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site plan for John zikis (ajkja John Xikis) Dear Chairman and Planning Board Members: We are the attorneys for John Xikis, who has an application pending before you for site plan approval for retail stores. Mr. Xikis' property is located on the south side of C.R. 48, near Greenport. Pursuant to the procedure applicable to the site plan approval process contained in Section 100-133 of the Southold Town Code, we respectfully demand that Mr. Xikis' site plan be approved at your Planning Board meeting scheduled for November 14, 1988. In support of this demand, we wish to bring the following to your attention: 1) In March of 1987, an application was made for site plan review on behalf of Mr. Xikis. At this time, a $100.00 fee was paid and an environmental assessment form was submitted to the Planning Board. The application was accepted by the Planning Board and the proposed site plan was given a number for filing purposes (site plan number 152). 2) The plan submitted in March of 1987 was drawn by the firm of Antonucci and Lawless, architects and engineers of Yonkers, New York. Their original plan was dated March 6, 1987. . . Planning Board, Town of Southold October 19, 1988 Page Two 3) The original plan was reviewed by your Board at a pre-submission conference held on April 13, 1987. Your records indicate that Robert Lawless of the firm of Antonucci and Lawless appeared for this pre-submission conference. 4) On July 17, 1987, the Chairman of the planning Board informed Mr. Lawless that the site plan had been reviewed by the Town Planner and requested additional information. 5) The site plan was revised in conformance with the letter of July 17, 1987. The revised plans are dated July 29, 1987. They were submitted to the Planning Board on August 3, 1987. 6) Apparently, additional comments were generated by the Planning Board or the Planning Board staff and, on October 22, 1987, Antonucci and Lawless prepared a further revised site plan. This was also submitted to your Board. 7) By letter dated December 14, 1987, your Board requested that an application be made to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services prior to further review. This application is being processed, but Mr. xikis' consultant for this matter, Roy Haje of En-Consultants, Inc., has been advised by the Department of Health Services that its review will have to await a determination on the site plan by your Board. 8) I understand that numerous attempts have been made to process this application for site plan approval by Robert Lawless of Antonucci and Lawless and his employees. These attempts have, apparently, been unsuccessful. I have reviewed the plans submitted by Mr. Lawless' firm and the requirements of your code. It appears to me that the site plan application is fully conforming and worthy of prompt approval. I understand from speaking to Mr. Lawless, Mr. xikis and other persons who have communicated with your Board's staff, that ~ ., Planning Board, Town of 8outhold October 19, 1988 Page Three there is a desire on the part of the Town or its employees, that the property not be used for a commercial purpose. Town employees have suggested to several of Mr. xikis' representatives that the property should be residential. As you know, the property is zoned "B Light Business". The proposed use is fully conforming. We request that the application be approved at the meeting scheduled for November 14, 1988. We intend to be present at that meeting to answer any questions relative to the site plan. 8RA: mb cc: Robert Lawless, Antonucci & Lawless Roy Haje, En-Consultants, Inc. ~ ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAl N STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 . WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. HEFTER STEPHEN R. ANGEL (SI6) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MONTAUK HIGHWAY P. O. Box 570 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 (516) 726-6633 JANE ANN R. KRATZ .JOHN M. WAGNER WILLIAM POWER MALONEY TELEX-EHCA 685231 a UW TEL.ECOF'IER NUMBER (SI6) 369-2065 ALAN D. OSHRlN OF COUNSEL October 19, 1988 Planning Board, Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site plan for John Zikis (a/k/a John Xikis) Dear Chairman and Planning Board Members: We are the attorneys for John xikis who is applying for site plan approval to construct retail stores on a parcel of property located on C.R. 48. We enclose three prints of a radius map of the property, prepared for Mr. Xikis by Peconic Surveyors- Engineers, P. C., which is dated January 6, 1988. This radius map is submitted in conformance with Section 100-134(1) of your zoning code. As you know, this application has been pending since March of 1987. We were only retained a while ago and, in our review of the application, we could not determine whether a similar radius map had already been submitted. If you have any questions or wish additional copies, do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. SRA:mb Ene. cc: Antonucci & Lawless truly yours, ((2& JJ N R. A(fEL '- . J/j .. Southold. N. Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 14, 1987 John Bertani 1240 Oakwood Southold, NY Drive 11971 Re: John Xikis Site Plan SCTM# 1000-44-3-1 Dear Mr. Bertani: Please let this confirm the Board's request with regard to the above mentioned site plan. As per the enclosed correspondence, the Board requests that an application be made to the health department for approval of the proposal by that agency prior to further review by the Planning Board. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, B/.J'U"X.d:l &- ~5kL\ Qil. QD BENNETT ORLOWSKI"JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PtAfY:.,:BOARD ene. . . . (~ YlklS HENRY P. SMITH, President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 ~"JL'iijiJi.J I;';ilii j LI"""IU L"".,oJ 1.86! V' (, lION DArE November 25, 1987 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold. New York 11971 Re: 1000-44-3-1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Pursuant to your request for comments regarding the above captioned matter, please be advised that the Board of Trustees reviewed the plan and inspected the property and have determined that they have no jurisdiction in this matter. Very truly yours, Zbit~~~ @ Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip cc: file . ~ .. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK / RECEIVED BY S~HaLD mWN PlANlliNG HUA/lv o V 1 7 lqa 7 DATE' ~, MiLhael A. LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS. M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER TO: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 DATE: November 16, 1987 RE: Site Plan for John Zikis 1000-44-3-1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: We are in receipt of your letter dated October 28, 1987 above referenced project. concerning the O1l. 01 2. 01 3. This Department has no objection to your designation of lead agency status. Insufficient information is available for technical comments. There is no record of an application to this Department. (J A more accurate project location is needed. (Suffolk County Tax Map No.) r:J 4. This Department has received an application and it is: (J Complete o Incomplete o Other: [2] 5. It appears that the project can be served by: Sewage Disposal System o Sewer System and Treatment Works ~ Subsurface Sewage Disposal System(s) o Other: COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD. N.Y. 11901 WWM-067 18-1309,.1186 (OVER) (516) 548-3312 .. ~ . o 5. Ccont'd) Water Supply System [] A Public Water Supply System [] Individual Water Supply SystemCs) o Other: o 6. Comments: The Health Department's primary environmental concern pertaining to development is that the applicant comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code especially Articles V and VI, and relevant construction standards for water supply and sanitary sewage disposal. These considerations are to be reviewed completely at the time of application. Full considera- tion in placement of water supply wells and disposal systems is given to State and Town wetland requirements. The Health Depart- ment maintains jurisdiction over final location of disposal and well systems and the applicant should not undertake to construct any water supply or disposal system without Health Department approval. Other portions of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code also apply to commercial development such as Articles VII and XII. The Lead Agency is requested to forward a copy of this form to the applicant with its findings. There is no record of an application for the proposed project on file with our department. Complete technical review of the project would require an application be made to our department including the information required to determine the suitability of the site for the proposed project. Further comment may be provided upon completion of the application review. Name ';;:;id4T~>70 Robert J. Farmvf --- -' Phone 548-3063 18-1309..1186 . . T . . p D Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 ~~ q I 1'1'g'7 Robert Brown Sidney and Bowne and Son Hauppague. NY 11787 Dear Mr. Brown: Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following: Application of (Y~jor subdivision, minor subdivision. site plan) -Si:b p~ Qm '-~ l\J\ ~ "2...Lk.i.n Hamlet .s~rJ MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File # Suffolk County Tax Map No. IClOD- LJ Lj - 3- I Sketch plan Preliminary map Street Profiles Grading Plan Preliminary site plan Final Map Other 0.Jv.io 1.0. ~rxn.'J.L Comments: Very truly yours, ~ ~./ (/-,. ,{-. BENNETT ORLOWSKI. JR.,CHAf'RMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD . . s . . T D Southold. N. Y. 11 971 (516) 765-1938 October 28, 1987 Environmental Analysis Unit DEC, Building 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 Gentlemen: Enclosed find a completed Short Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the site plan for John xikis located at Greenport, SCTM # 1000-44-3-1. This project is unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm Our initial determination. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until November 28, 1987. We shall interpet lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and our agency will aSSume the status of lead agency. Very truly yours, Birwit ();JJJwGL.) 9r-~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD enc. cc: Department of Health Services Office of Ecology Trustees By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary ANTONUCCI AND LAWLESS ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 480 NORTH 8ROADWAY YONKERS, NY 10701 19141 423.8844 . o URGENT _ o PLEASE RESPOND""" ~ NO REPLY NECESSARY TO: <SOlJTliol-b fiaJJ/0 fLAtvf0l f.Z'1 f3D_ 'SotntPl-f) TctU/--' tfA-LL- ~UTtf-oL-\) )to./, 1\ ,,'( { -~ DATE: (0- 2-7' 87 SUBJECT: 'SlTe flAP fbfl- JOHI'" Xl K ($.- Cz-fL-eEf0 fD(2.1 "56 'lM #- levo -14-3- E'IlED'BI t+E f1E LOn H- <SU(3 M II TEO - fLev l Se [) "::>(Te fL.-A tJS ~ ffl--EV\oL):, fLA10'::> -vEPT S lX Sl:-lS OF fLl:;; A.-SE vOlD (0- U, -51 FOLQ .. fOLD . ,- SIGNED: rJ~ ~ IiIm1I DATE: SENDER: SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES WITH CARBON INTACT FORM NO. MR13N ~ ANTONUCCI AND LAWLESS ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS 480 NORTH 8ROADWAY YONKERS, NY 10701 (9141 423-8844 . o URGENT . o PLEASE RESPOND BY pil"'NO REPLY NECESSARY TO: SO\rn+OL.D 1Dw~ 'f'l..AtJl-JI~t.r &.Aa.b .c,o"1~(?\..n "'tQ1.tJt-J ~+-Al..1,.. SOV11-\",\..n ) tv. "C. \ 1'\' I Ai,.: ~t-'t-Je:'T,.T c>t'l-l.OW~\ In... EIDiI.II fOLD . ~ DATE: 10 - 2G - 8' SUBJECT: 'Sti5" f'(...~t-J f"q'\.. J.:.l+tJ~tKlc; ($2 C:;-ru;'e'p 1"6'12-,. .,.- d Sc:. TM .. lOG:lO-4<f- ~-I Oc-, .2'1~ ~~~ ~~/ ~O~ ~~~I~ ~f ~ I+e=n..e: \U \"\1+ ~I,)Bl-1 \"'TGD fl..ea...V5' <S T - 12-e:\J\seo AD'P l'"tlot-'~~ f"~-rll"q-'S ~I) [\....1') I ~Cr . DiD -0- ~ '\,JJ ~C) "~f1 \Q~ .b..$ -?I?fl.. t'QU(\....- .SGc:.oPT/ '$ \,.~ r"L.. A-t-J"5 - Sl-Io IVt W;- i F\}f1,... -rHo8\-- SEt ~.A'-~ of fOUl .. SIGNED: SIGNED: SENDER: SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES WITH CARBON INTACT FORM NO. MR13N ANTONUCCI AND LAWLESS 1\(:\....\. ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS ~" 480 NORTH BROADWAY ""U'''.l" 10", , YONKERS, NY 10701 I' ' , '" (914) 423.8844 ' ,--..., DAfEr TO: SooTtlOt..() 10WIV -:;; C\./1 tto'L..-D Towl'J . So..TCt{l?-D I tv, (, (qr:) 7&'>,' % b.- Is' ItW,f'J1 ~ U-A-LL-- lIOC1/ --- --- .pJ..,,~ " ,'4 Id." o URGENT 0 ~y 0 PLEASE RESPONO BY.. ",!,.ii HOARO~NO REPLY NECESSARY BD, DATE: B. 3 <, 37 "'i>ITt:::' rL.-.~{'-) ~ J'+Ir-J Xl\<l'f:, @ CrILec-IVI~T ~' 1'-1:::tf. Q;..(;>- - 3- mmD 1+et:2.€ 1-0 lTtt Sv13 H lTTED AC2 PE r-- 'CcNr?/ (E''( ~TCE(\.r DA-l:5'D ~ JvL-\, 17, /1 B7) 'fZ-e\Jl$t:: D ~~c ,:~~A\~BZ ~~~~~~ \ f(Lofd;ED Tcf'o4 'L-~~ . SIGNED: ~ ~ i312-~ f'(ETe.vS.A!JT1 fOlD .. ita SIGNED: DATE: SENDER: SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES. - -- --- fORMNQ. MR13t+. . . . s Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 17, 1987 Robert Lawless Atonucci and Lawless Architects and Engineers 480 North Broadway Yonkers, New York 10701 Re: Site plan for John Zikis at Greenport - SeTM #1000-44-3-1 Dear Mr. Lawless: The above mentioned site plan has been reviewed by the Town Planner. Would you please submit the following information: six site plan surveys with existing and proposed topography. Upon receipt of the above, we will continue our review. Very truly yours, . ~O~S~I~9D SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD .~ By Joan Davis cc: John Bertani ~ , .. .. 1 . . f ( ,,/) ~~ (./ (l~ ( vi" ( ./ ( 1,--1 ( ( j/-) ( \..---f ( ) ( ) ( ) (.v{' ( ) ./ -- ( V) (~ ( ) ( {;1' ( //1 ( V~ : \J~ \\. ~_&S~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ . . . . SITE PLAN ELEMENTS ~100-134 Town Code Lot, block, and section number, if any, or the property taken from tax records Name and address of the owner of record / Name and address of the person preparing the map Date, North arrow and written and graphic scale Sufficient description or information to precisely define the boundaries of the property. All distances shall be in feet and tenths of a foot. All angles shall be given to the nearest ten seconds or closer. The error of closure shall not exceed one in ten thousand. The locations, name, and existing width of adjacent streets and curblines The location and owners of all adjoining lands, as shown on the latest tax records ) Location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, setbacks reservations, and areas dedicated to public use withinor adjoining property. A complete outline of existing deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property Existing zoning Existing contours at intervals of five or less, referred to a datum satisfactory to the Board Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflc Location of existing watercourses, marshes, wooded areas, rock outcrops isolated trees with a diameter of eight inches or measured three feet above the base of the trunk and other significant existing features. Location of uses and outlines of structures, drawn to scale on and within one hundred (100) feet of the lots. Paved areas, sidewalks, and wehicular access between the site and public streets Locations, dimensions, grades and flow direction of existing sewers, culverts and waterlines as well as other underground and above ground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Other existing development, including fences, landscaping and screening The location of proposed buildings or structural improvement The location and design of all uses not requiring structures such as off street parking and loading areas. The location, direction, power and time of use of any proposed outdoor lighting or public address systems. The location of,and plans for, any outdoor signs The location and arrangement of proposed means of access and egress, including sidewalks, driveways or other paved areas; profiles indicating grading and cross sections showing width of roadway, location and width of sidewalks and lcoation and size of water and sewer lines. OVER.. . i I , , . . . . . Site plan elements cant. (~lOO-134) (/ ( ) ( ( ( ) ) ) ( ) Any proposed grading, screening and other landscaping including types and locations of proposed street trees. The location of all proposed waterlines, valves and hydrants and of all sewer lines or alternate means of water supply and sewage disposal and treatment. An outline of any proposed deed retrictions and/or covenants. Any contemplted public improvements on or adjoining the property. If the site development plan indictes only a first stage, a supplementary plan shall indicate ultimate develoment. Any other information deemed by the Planning Board necessary to determine conformity of the site plan with the intent and regulations of this chapter. \~Y '0\ CY . . . ~Xk 32-55 STEINWA Y STREET ASTORIA, NEW YORK. 11103 TEL. (718) 274-7744 Matteh IUh, 1987 Southold Planning Boakd TOWrt Hall, Mal~i Road Sou;thold, N. V. 11971 To Wham It May Coneekn: Thi~ will authokize Robekt Lawle~~, akehiteet to 6ile an applieation an my behal6 60k pkopo~ed ~toke~ an my pkopekty, Middle Road, Southold. Sineekely, ~~. Mk. John Xiki~ ~ . ,- .'4-'H 191841 r.. ",QQ7 (4t,.. PROJECT 1.0, NUMBER ,1 MAR .LNEWYORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ~,.f.\ ~.~ ' DIVISION OF RECULATORY AFFAIRS _ _' State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I Projectlntormallon (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. AP.""nV.pon.~ \~) '-t ~ ~ - 'l! '& '+ 't . T 2. Project Name ;,. .,~- . -'-.'" -. n_~ ," ~' J, Project location: Municipality Southhold,. L. I. County Suffolk 4, Is p~osed action: New 0 Expansion o Modlflc:aUon/alteraUon S. Oescribe project briefly. Construct new retail stores .. " Precise location (road Intersections. prominent landmarks. etc. or provide map) Located on Middle Road (CR 27 ) 119B.BO"West of A1berton Lane 7. Amount of land affected: Initlallv J II acres Ultlmatelv 2 a acres S, Will proposed action comply with existing zoning or other existin, land use restrictions' ~ ~s 0 No If No, describe briefly . . ", What is present land use in vicinity of projecH f ~esidential 0 Industrial 0 Commercial o Asricuhure o Parkland/open space o Other escnbe: . -. '0, Does action involve a permit/approval, or fundlns. now or ultlmatelv. from any other sovernmental asencv (Federal, state or localll o Ve. g No If yes, list asencv(s) and permit/approvals I 11- Does any aspect of the action have a currently valid permit or approvall o Yes ~ No If ves, list 'Iencv na~e and permlt/approvallvpe '2, As result of promed action wilJ"elllisUnl permit/approval require modiflcaUonl o Yes No , 7 I CERTIFY THAT THE INfORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS -TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDCE Applicant/sp n. , ame: Robort: E L.3.U19E:C ~rghit99t fgr J"gRn Zi":;s Date: 1/1nu Signature: -U V lithe acllon Is In the Coaslal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form belore proceeding with this assessment <v <VOVER . '''16-4(9/84) . . . ,- . nl 0 1 (' 1QQ] '., PROJECT to, NUMBER 1\ N\Ar\ .: l..NEW'VOIt STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ~,7.1 ~ ' DIVISION OF RECULATORY AFFA'RS _ ,_ State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I Project Inlormatlon (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) " APplk.nVspnnso( 9 \ 4} '"t a..:3 - ~ <a 't L\- !,. Prolect Name ~,-, "r~h;~_ n _~ ~" _. J. Project IDeation: Municipality Southhold, L.r. County Suffolk - .. Is PijOled action: New 0 Expansion o Modification/alteration S. Describe prOject briefly: -Construct new retail stores ", Precise location (road Intersections, prominent landmarks. etc. or provide map) Located on Middle Road (CR 27) 1198.80" West of Alberton Lane 7. Amount of land affected; Initially 2.Q acres Ultimately 1 e acres 8. Will proposed action comply with exlslin. zonlnl or other exlstlnlland use restrictlonsl ~ Yes 0 No If No. describe briefly .. What is present land use In vicinity of projecU f Residential 0 Industrial 0 Commercial o ^srlculture o Parkland/open space o Other escribe: -- 10. Does action Involve a permit/approval, or funding. now or ultimately, from any other governmental agency (Federal, state or local)l DYes g No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals I 11- Does any aspect of the action have a currently valid permit or approval' o Yes ~ No If yes, list asencv name and permit/approval type 12. ^s result of prOfjed acllon will exlstln, permit/approval require modification' o Yes No . r I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sp nsir ame: P..QSl3rts E I.3.r.!lg,S~ Ax-gait.gat: fer .Joan 'li~;'3 Date: ,llOlR Signature: \ '-' V - - If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a stale agency, complele the Coaslal Assessment Form bel ore proceeding with this assessment 'v 'vOVER a I °Nei IZLa"I " ho V 1J YJ 4 I T, p4 'AIJT°Nlou �. O ' �N,'7 13 It.�... II u.� a IZ L.4 S�r �� �" Q' r� I� yI 4rs `I I � 14 12 o'A �vll pip +12„0 :. � +15• I nxal«I d Pa,�'r V / .� la I�Kr looc� `Jec, ott 4 PSK �h for I / / I u r' r« aIt �~ � vtil 1'{'P W 'sRf:h l�kdy' k� , N ./� - _ -- .- ....._...0....,”► - � ) 7 i.. . L'i rV A4TG''.' ' , C^ Cal` Ll�: µi d —h4L a Vt ILL ok GouQ"T`(' U.I. �IIC)v, / ab. ,7 { Q0. ,• .__ / ,� ) F—rP—+ .i , lI -,Soo s4 F-T ell odTa+ hpz"� w I i I v x ,: � PAof D&UIN � —* � /d p F Lfh lal2s 55 X`Lora x z s r r 4,4L-" a`i r7 Q11Z { iq Id: IVY. �. �.. / - � / ' 1 " �� 3 4,70R, (40. 20 x 100 = 4elroe vY .,.I I ` _ -"^-� ..,,.� Yj', " '�',. I �'►� a� v � , `� 1 �° '� o Imo` �A1a.1411.1�rit E�.if 6� - "1 OLdR�i r Id _ __ c Zo'nl3'•yu I PAFu vtu,, f°(20"+/irj G S 11i . �� .�� s ,• � , NG I- ` " �� ✓ 4i@a 6Benip�P PRGA _ " 2¢ai , AS1 5 i I a , �• . iF 11.0.� -� G�P✓E a 12.1 J T 1=siMArN . r7aT✓M is MELiJ 11.5 p a \ a11r . ' l' - 1 t•.-, (us,/ a r� �arurn fI ,r � T I !�', �,oD IzWeu � �. P.AVIr•I�, �r�) MC-w b � I Imo... � � � O \ �tU 1Ja•� \ ' , �C`, 4" 'i`,# 4'N� 'fi,''' --. -y � IAIFoF'MD71 I�aFRnM hUK•VeYs VAN I ' �� � q6o 14� 198� 4 APR.L12P1� 1`6 4 �•` 2v / by 4r'up+'• n 1�.4«'T'Mh . ," f2.3 OWN6� OHJ LI GIS Tth ftp { i .._—V) r_' �e�'rarar,N o l dI rgore 4 �vaE;,� �� ry yrelrJway s II:D i / / /; I U / a r4y A�itO�ID I� ( , 11102 , U Nore '• 5xwl 'er I+ouh� , 4ARAzC 7° iEPEN10 hHer> LI�i�S+ � � h �, i Q I •-' � � h1T� f4 �� a�G�Drz�n, ' 9 8 _ 4" h}Rrl LAD J b+) � V II,o� 20` _ 9�AINA�� para I1, / q HeFt� AceatEa�, COIWtcF 1�``s P ~ ems 55'6vo sF V4= CaG95ofvx.wr�=.t%I=1D112c s 0 G4CFF. op Ruuo FP I,n Jol.or9e R2a'o sl.Q`fl2 cot" FeQf RECEIVED BY 15•RY,.6'r.1C�-! r.... .m.,.....r..,- _ , a. � dd4as 4NING RR1RR Q � 60FFR of R✓ aW1. 100 y 1987 1 DATE oaF 41V/GoRLa`UstNs1 6 5��aX4'v=%l.�IG`�,ifC�Gd(fi%lc.I Sri-elOeyr3 Lp + + �'� + 'C`T'Pw1iER ,141WiYl1 f'ftdJlv.7e IIAINpAk 2rNc«f�r :..° IU lo• I ', II 11—fid �'_ ' o- I - �I r �3,G a 'VoWHfY cadr.�ILdYION fo%MJLa 'TOOLV,Cvma e wf; �I $p G) aF oY 31G ,o 5 I ?3 Ga ' Qo EZ, 13 114 Vc^ AR c T`(t Iti A L f'tNktl�[Ai 4'ruLL x'13 naslNs 12=°° Pu+MBTER. x 11 X00 F IQ ` W x 2e>:' a R + t Po Li �( C7f7Va• 1443 (V61a I l*T vow* rju P)Ah 4 1188.60 Td fordt �owwe, RBq'p = 11,SoV7 LY 44 12fts°� VoLJME 19,00 e r- �bNrS� G\SjERED ARCyaT _ .. =PLAINTIFFS E. 6XHIBIT NO. yITQNUCCI' &' LAW►L.ESS . , ::.1` , .0 :11 . ; I ' � E a r tcs,= /. Ari.-, 3-u� I� anl��n �T�I,���•5 eS . FOP IDENTIFICATION ', is W"•x�. « I`'' 'j ` ,�ry GdH 1 `E�Y� 7 �y•a� �;aa �rgFQ ' ARCHITECTS'& ENG+II�EI# i 49 r� �Y�6 0 1025" _ 4ao NORTH B�RQADVkY' x.'1 r :. - Of yFTHE STA'(6tlF YONKRS�, N Y. 10701' "� �{ {' '• { pRAwNfSy; 1�.�• i � , Mrysti P', n to 14ht �dn1 +n . � >w 2 ,fa„r�n a, u v ' ,;; °� 'Y V ------ I 1r' v r fai r 5 I I V V I' I � " I nye � t S � UTN41.Y� � F�tiOaf sk 17 11 1a lCN✓J�cP LQ � IN I � r ' I8I to ', I, 1"�� �'/ I •, � �I, la, 4 IS �, r° ` � 9 Ah � PRA P2nVl✓1�0 qGi G�r70 s �. e r I h v S '' r r✓i, A tr -Q U O p R _ JULJ I(�R• r �� r � f' L d �:;�'��",'h➢d, trst IOW e 1�+�;Y , �9', "�`"fi ' Z F�7.bAG ILL IN flf 0 Y , i I$6 riE 4 "�rir yy il If Ij�Y" d I di, NlP NN IF, Y 1 . '.5hw} v v:Yl� Vi f ' vGI r ay k r' ul� il Sri 4ui Li "'.:, glLk T �S y y ' • IGo4 . t � ,aI M,f V i �, 1 � _ � I ". ..`.fit ,. • n,vtT ,' i Q�oOgitT E. ����F t ._...«�,......,.. ..., V I%��N� ,.,.�....,...,.w...,..., r......,.o...,„.................. � � �F �r 1�12D `'P05�.1� �.�TdIL sTO �� S - �ATE,� �•��sr * ANTONU &CCI LAWLESS ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS . ° W F � �' r 4GA16 !'= W "�. ,az8b � 4$O � NORTH' BRCii\M of aoN zi i: is -- rNe srnt YONK.ER,S o 'M-Y, 1070 , \ a i LoNaI. I�iL.►,a✓J FOOVNY9 - (Z®VMd�r A. -AIntA . f PAPA�fTnNlovi `I' i 6. I � � �em,c Aum. r I,dul�t>N Plan w r rl '7 13 2 II IGS 11. 1•L �-dT �15� r? tvl 1'4i Cj:Cb 4a W . _._... ` ,• . .43 ._.�• _ _ ggt�,�-� ,of I i` �'� � �p,I1N �`iF7r'Nr1� /-- � .. ,/ rtx, -°', - 1a. .;�..�� ri, . 2owIC- „�,. 1. 1aH` f�auy!1,..,4•UFsSa z 71 )TE rG rLhif Gaub.f+rlRtB tL �ouTk4c91.1'7 , j; uFFo41C. teau "TT �� 7 �� •. � � ✓i�• r _ . '� �� GaN#"f Gr � �3 ' �//� � f X ' . RET�INiN Wdl.l +�sGA�l.1'�. I'I��i"�� f �I1 �. ev ew �ir��nNTel?S w • r . w 51 n ` Ta,,�ao sqF TI•o 11 0 eP DR.PrN �\ ' I _ ......x' I - ,rIf o i cr w'tCs1#t pP t�x I' ' P FARi ilA fZESd� -toiaR4 rVl Z I`IkO � 1 tk'K�i113lEPA1FxG C7�9 �Rt b 2�7.("; y" i' I0 fj�, I�. sa 0 ? '-- �-- �—_ _ � e �. •""� _ I fI •-.w 16'1,�II.O, .ate+`"'_ 1� � -I" l;'Xl�ff'G GkA✓Xs •�O QF.MMn1 . 19aTJM 1�. MP.dhI f31" T d � - . � �;r=4 ! � . � � b+SA I.CvEL (v5G if 4Y7. �?A") HVi T. I " O �.., � [�r,{.ueLj:QA 1 1 Nrsv✓ GKOr76 pcIST• �otlTwlt ��. cfwT ur AV �V� "'k JL y INFe�Md71af.1 )h FkaM buZVeYa 1 r 14 , 198' rJ APR _I2, I�(l2, 40, i\ '' �y=i _ Z N\ gol Ed';_" ° 7�' ''o 4s, fi 12•�+C� OWNG� JOrIN LIY.IG+ p L aW 1-4 Ga �a 4' Cve L�s� a �Ce 0�✓� "-rlry v yrEINWa ( �iT. P — _ RnnF R2niF1 - F N -^ � ISEp�C 45T0(ZI4 r N f^ illp2 / / - / i —� NO(: '• �K�T'G 1{oo4o r Gdpp(E To $6 MMaW,9000 I. p 0 ;.✓ 1. �I. 20'.. �4� p fld1�G nn I 'i xl°I0112cu . even a 2a► 5�i yv sp , JLVHeWIC) t I, r d�6-G 11 ,E 00 9p V r r i PJuyl ✓ i A ' 1 curksRA :� ��n � r# . p coErF. avRauo Io ° 'V12 °fozreor ! 'P,+ p, M.� j �� � c� � �/ d� Cc aC. cU,?ft T,-qp . � -, 11.5 %y � J GRes� 4FbG�y05� GPa�c ARfP4 . •. - _ .� -�J 4i4�.i'7U;,,M:tt,7G.�'i.. GoBPP ov EuNosF 1. 1% VI; � 5uvti�i1'X.I4. Xd6�f0 CF r, � '".•.� J� Ola. x � 1 C�W J�-��G`,>L•Fr.� 1 ^� .�X� � VeLu�te pd4 a=/09ea�'rylo r�e� V1 d �A A�� t , r I'g " 'iltl'1!'alA• ' 'jl fNc+•I r vue�Pw:�r�ra..�ct—�(�+Ic,�d' 7 Afaw t A I.Ac'oN ro440LA . . ?ural. ,l4)rw W'P- I I�Ho�t al 13 - �17b61P15 !?%0° vInMETE2 xf ��Ob00P to ��PEDARC Ff�T 4 Ptubi Il lh ti &LL LAG s e , 2 b SIN V S F G I(. mLUMO (.r_ f �f'h lJh P'L�1 V � g F, c, S # e s m �!I � �r l�ol I v,F' CyS�A• 1198.80 -('0 7ofdt JotUrtE Kta'O = ir,ad°i GY 4��2t�o� VoLoM� faovloclo = /?,430 of � �� Q ca�G 1 3 IMr1Rr&p cvP , _ 9 N F�4r _ - _ - - �.�• - OF THE77 Ij. Arn��n e.unzvvres ds irk, � � l. S. P. b. cant I c�M t5 r a9•a Al �i'�'�tR:�'$ +�,�s� �1Vi� '� ' �' iFe. ', SE"A�lfZ) FeMni=N-rr;S V'eT� 3�"zz-aY 460 NORTH BRf)l►C�►�if11f' _.. ._ �� 2 YONV"So. N.Y. . 110701 pnawM y= a,�, r'.L ..,:., ev SOUiSf,:u BOARD DATE Pei , Y", 'I?r 4 v*r44 o leo v r•fa W. �a u I-j T�f fJy A IZ P-A I 1 12;rjo 0 vq Fr AMA ce 2g 12G, 4q r-Ir lift, w urp 04 \jul4i toe 19 W" N/ s" rHorgAa 14 41, IZ Ull AR L--'7- SOAT)e MX57crL 7TZEC-5 ILI oo� THE StAZ (p T,4 11, Gl&) 81 1 1) AWL` AW &OMK"TS ro +4 � r rJ , TZa` MA* A, Mo4A + eza z pLAI4 LOT 315,0 n, 1�° 5eo' 40 `IW S 14 13 13,�i w3 a mac. 07tr4 Pyl,r�•r1 "h I.oT k �� �", � � DRM1s,,t �� wu.,1 /' ' r.� �a� ✓ 2Caa.ICz (h Lla.k'� @a�t�l!:��S4+2i ' ' 4"—"'h 4;JYT1B M la4' C 1T Y�I � ( ' 112 ��trlf J I 1 E I L4IJ IL v Sourt µal:r , , SujxF&LK c.ou&IT"T !.1`C. � A- ,�,...It pdTci, P�Psb Fa�� . — � NI I5 y�lotwarW �� v /� gLpTn A{RQ ��in �©+ds 11P6a, (°j.� P °>;?civ, , rh '- 4 f f" 44604 'Ri.��.�+xiD-C". l" ll• .. F ¢ x K 1 s Mo N 4T&^60 tax lac 4aaCi T. 1 � l2 , �--- -•-.. I\ \ ;p ''s �'� 2e1x 131�F° � �/ ,� I'3,Q 7 p f u �- 1�gN.KtlJd�i RIBS -.. 'i r•+LRb I � rN v � / . I G i `3 7' 1CkINA ('P10JIf�E'kh 7 i GARS ,� —tip � � ._ � fI—_•_"_' ,, �' � �� in'A la'•y"- � � � � I ��I �, �✓ Lpme��W,asi mRa7� I �8rf'�tAt �ry•F�� ' 11p1�mWiA®!7 45y�5ca�yfi [, 1- \ 3� > �<�C� �k1.0�- ( p•I ,Ik.P'�F I � �" EXl�if'G 4kP✓+f '(O �.MAW . r7GTJM Is ME6tJ Lu 9 p [s�pic.�Tpl+Wi+1rR1�) \ Nor/ aK�a� _ p..'c1Si.dontwrZ -, . ��n 1<' - Ct•a.�.. t�`. rj D_\0 1. �IDa ':- -k ..� I "�I. -_,. .-_ jQ INF��NATlala Ih "-oM OvrweY,� (2anaasc — \IAr4 Tuv1. , P.c. 1 2oxhj-y � Lot 4� 7 X15' $ �— 1 RGHTIw� a !`4.3 OWnk62� JOH1J LI I%Iri OF 'y74'GIr9 Nf61NV✓a`( �iT, f I 7 NOr� : �XIyT'G N�X+� 1GdR �uE Tv Oig XMOU,9RCV O 1 0 q � � f _^� nATG 9 a 411 �i'(lS i9 fr I / T I I t7;/ _ " II,� - -2O - - , HdF19 AIZEA4 L -`' - PAVOO kyWA 568904}& V, 4M, JF'., �e--{xl lMI M"m, e 1 p hGet .10%14tipf* d e o vo uMa Wa'e 41, d o,*w rw >' .� � �KV' � --•--1'_��/._..._ +"-., :1¢'v r,# . 1 ► �eWi'P (b(AK� , ' `- ?' .. _�� e'� coeFf of c�rlae� �.IGJ F �fiV S,vX+av4rx.t6. x.15./oT �ff y pp 1(sLUMb ,G6Q 0'/�I°Jdo KGET �� wNEP� �trw.whk�', � ty`� 1 �AIB>`Ak IHGIIY�/ S roRM 1otP+ !arra [ea'A ,.� -� ` 9 - p5 aN£R / VOWHG. °ALaJLdpvN s �I BOOJ GF F-- 3.� RE��I�€o BY Ve.• A(ua / -----�---"i rr 11 L �IGs ,O' S 1 +�° Go 40 � .. k� 19' 1. Q� r M ED ARC t3 6Qu1k19w MR MING B 7l+4 tJh /Q-a vinMe NAe 'A I.(o vop- tEa NiT �S f0 i � ti� L P k LL ,v lam. !s'C>� 1#24te ' '{• � iiic di aWMO gAhlnl Q < 'fw V vn P i I� F e s D' wxZo r'oLlw os'7A• IIR8•8o -(o � TOtdl. VvLUMFi W'd a67 iZ1yo�l JOLJM& rovi l61C! 6ArJro � � . - � . - �"r. p .. , 9A T✓{�� 3'4a� - ,.I�� � " �'P THE S1 Atc T'Y11CC' M LAWLESS . :4 1 - .G' �.f 15I L ' I {J14"L� - t� LtiD1�C'P Gdt•iT4�VfL3 ' A5 (°ER 47, qS. 4oMT5 7.25,6. ARCHITECTS & ENGkiNEE1tSs' L_ SCA[F = ! '3 z) gev sen t �,rc�. n $.w! L [dr r CN t6 Iv. 2Z- 4a 0 Z484 NORTH BROADWAY _ , I -YI�R$� N.Y, 74701 _ . lh L..&T 31 5. o' N 13° 5Gr 4 _7­Ml 3�z A T+4 or L.Y7 v 1.7f I.Jy pp OA 11 2 rlg 0 7q frr P p A90* Rem *,R f:Pf, w FLUG rL* a Go, V4 Q UrA iro x I IL jj W to wa LOT 3-7*, 13 • 40" 0 SOA-V5 J-tASTErt, 7r4ljC-J; ED AR E FeO ? OFOW eE,:TAILL Gl DF, G -,t;'Are,p 14- - AMTO� "LAWLESS S- 2 1C PS "Tot"4Z _9 10WOURS -"Log NCH 0" vw .17f; 400 Is. r }� . TZOVMdh A. GAfv64 oV wy. ' },, T a:d 'h w� r - s ,. t� r r. wv ,p r,.e-�. 94et pLr, �.vr I Qi2 s {u r jz I" / �\ � 'a'A�11,1, J � p° �h G' i n� � - �1�IC'�i � w�1�3'a l. le",�. `.�.,�UF?•dA.Jrt�4 j IIS f 9 �� w a r '�� i � I 'TYA b'tll'�{C ,� I LL - •� _. __ G �+yQ �I yt .p r- lig FMI .�. . I , IN, ilnrwDl � .k y i1~ / 5kN', brr. -'l).,SoD.?a+2F5_ 1 Ea JI , cAut.P�aaIJPo - � '- ° - ! a { %1F16� ARisA Ilooc� Q Pop POIN � � � � � tC r r�1 ' S5 x`Cab " `-II 'C 4A4lr , 051' �14- p Iopza�fpT ISO 2 # s #TuYlnFt 2oK Zao 4er.,cs r . " c � 'A`f T r I � $. ., LA ' qD, �/, � [' ' V Al : It h C°�EehJ�t f 71 4044 r }_ t �.` , .. g� N to fir \ ` C♦ l z R ARBA rL$9i2aia5f t - L �ws' sen 7- x�a� ' ANIP40 4.r7,re,", � . ti 'IfL I a IIILP rl }2.1 -�- 6xltif'a aeon TO gt- ,%W 1ATVM rs Meo1J 0 ( �a" ',_c-_.. �� � }. -. �.,.OI � w \ . ' a �' �i��, � I (� $�Et ', ( -- htn leWEl• (U�iG � 4 r� acruM� `tea o 4 T \ 4 !s , �w j� � T.�'. ,_ N 1 p �:� �'r� - � I Jl,y h1�M/ GKAI7C �JCI$T. eaPl7vula✓ �. - Ca-iT , �1} coF,2uuIL T 0 7 s �. tr,. •t� �..j -. 1/Jpoe' A7'IVI.I Ih FwM 4UR-VEKL gr{ •, �'" ., r - - 't 9 �OY��t✓'IGI_ VAnI VYI - P.xt r � 198' 2 3 R,drrT'w 12, � O N I., �I � �'1,--,ter --..7 . _ � ,9 �. . ,ga � /;'+r..�2 _ ' �� 2a II r+'� • .r . I _ — .N g' ` - M,, ! W E� J OH rl LI 'L14i , 7 17yoF vl2a,y o- �. a ��. i��r —� ,, !}5[?aE R 4�to21a N { IIla2 Nor?, H , G we ry PiE DEMDLi,7Rc1 h o I Ira f G n. cea�„ S .. 0 i r i �' In p4: , a1N ac barn .: �• , �t6ft9 AYlkDci a _ ��' 4. ,f ! -„ . -.._;,.•f . _. 16 � ,•.- eye Iadh 55 qvs -_ � •rF>,.loro., x = qq F fv 3c I 012 ' �ev� ��A. 11 rr6ao eafv, -VD ' , {}.5 T p I (w orRouorG i,o JoloMc PFr'orl.�'fI2 ounw peer ,, SHA a , 6rcgogf 4RAK atfns Ga9F.r or Rwl>rF ai ' I Vc•4g,raa�yrx,ro.ttgx.lf./D9aar VIP, 14:4+ I '" ' , ' r I -�'t .ccS� VnluM6 Re4'a=/0"hic�Mc r-rer - t cw C +nr gtiSF stII,sB RalNkku . 21FGD{F� -I- rxx v , ._. ' i ., - '� � - - .YpWEi& cd4 LpA lon roRhlJ4k Tofh1- VddM& kta�Os. }I �Dl G� � � M I _i f �4 � 13 0 I co L �1 ,a 5 13 7 REO Rif- E.. R M M E C S H� "F (,P[�.�'r P�ijCl�� �T��I. '17ASiN5 /2•D f71PN8T82 Y• I�•0 DAF' GAS T IO1 VV '9,10' ( �j 1n9°l 'L�IG P�Mr VOWW hAc Pl e` oERt a ray��¢V ECEIVED BY Jd 11 ++�Ir i, e1L }Uy ria. }}q B,Sv (O fDrbL fOLUMFiQCR'PV z �I,SOrJ �iY * m N 1t SHE B 1OWN NMI BBAIItl 4lPXs(Ctyo� VDIoMe '(RDYIow = /2 430 ati �'I o °OV 9 1981 �A _ : - 'f ' aa,1;4 ,5 } �' I � :�' M i i ' �, Y ' 1:'+e ^!'� � 1 �/�� ff',f� tF k,#�Ed:Y!�p�. . ���� '� SJ� . _ Y'•'� ��. , , e-. A ccj A L� � � 6� -- - - I� A�t� Ch C•pMTOVrt$ � DS f ER ' ' � ' S. .'S. cor-IrtEl1Y5 7.2y•a7 ,, ' E i`i � �. .: I � � ?, � �,CF4,CE , 1" '�tFi x ->✓F. [sin � .x � CIS � t•tCN t'4 ?yA F� ,, �/'� ' '{'. aitFi�, ' ,.:� .. � �7 � 11 . ' _ , s .'•/ F#!+�F " fir# fmIHo As •'�,� - . _ S SUUTNBID l� 6UAUtl i i I Loj 35. 0' I Ei 'W 2a it✓t.� Z' b;,,,y�wr`4'i+,7i •'^ i � M r ' k�, � . w M s.: - d +IL � r , + a b , � � �, i � 2 .�la r.iNK �ya -; -yi ��A ' ,�" V %� '� 4 �1� v."r1_¢.rc�, w�` >t` r.,m>•' ti r • r : P� q iv FI>• ,+.,'�u"',tr *F- . 1G:>v � n ., � i �. rl,' �E 'J ,,S v Y I'r �'',Iib -G .�,,.� �1TC'�'4 �,.,-.. I� ♦ 4 .,,i n�r,1 � � I � � �� � _ —� rUT44vLo , fJY C' LJ d �P.Y1AE' hOA 1.F. �lls 3v! A �'ip !1 Z!G/00 -�,Q FT qa I I thl t-AdIOO'I APA keq � ,a�, 1 f �� ' r I• � , � '_ '�r � �N��an�r� P�� P2oVi�� �ti, �yv ��Nr. � "' J lia l9 Si r i t 3"r paL{wcdr ° s a' a' �i� ' i'r� � 4 MLEA INy ro X11 ; Fl-OWSR. INk DoorlAC�FIrn`S ` 117- TREE'S gr rskyr° _NUYN' 0.y- , _ a ti y „y :'.w',Irk ,", w+ ergErt Q `5440S HAI ; 21 TRc S � � 3E1w16141i'- , LOAD IMG7 - „t21 rlf 1!d o ? r� tia t3ti - i� t n ' N,e i, n• I�' '.s 1 Lr $ F NI r r (XILQ Sy { -I • I t r, K r. • 1 rj f �' I �Y� > 14 Yra )Mfg �a �! I � - '�1 ' •a � > . 0 't'kc • - ,! .ft- AIr4 al,.x i'Y �p:`b '4 �'_ a�, - SHAT* MAISTERTR�'C5 0ARCpTT G PRnPen T t Pei IMc E uw fPl 2'7 IU I.LL �F Y I II G 1 � O r A �^ d L� ✓f�T •' �/'�0' V 1�71aN�7 M /TYCF THE A1�ITC I c LAw� 55 I ICV 1 Vr F� `��a f V 1, !-rzVl5E 11 dS PC-T, S_ P-F, Gc� 1MEtiTS a.z1.9� �N t���nn1,, "� �t4+ ENG Cpm+ Gy' v l� 'T1"f �l'AL!� �..- Z `t1Y '+� AAcAtilt wl .�i,tf,+ViiINE. EAS {+Ii.Pk0 1111,0 2� P vlsa��s P'r`A s, l' vr 10 i-I 1 15r ' y uaNa Isu,Lr vNY.t h1r TZ®�Mdh Q. GAfo6A T, pfPAAltmNlau _�--- � : yr�ea �� � LocaTloN P6Ah1 I / LOT rJ rt Scvr 4 � .a 11.x' �. . �.._.�,..,.•...^.___.-�__ __.<_..�+_w..•._. .. .e.�..�-.�...� f5, ._.._.... .� I '�i Q r v 11 'DIxP 2.0 -� I �A i -2 tiJa ..�,. Li W* Pz 1 6r�g -r^. "#on*RO�� ; �4u�.�BMA�r(SIG r � IL to 4R El f+• iln gars ;;.R f:-roArcft ao�� fv "p�C;`. s ; '. �$ s j — R��per 1�V7�i� 55 x2ar� v Il000 4 - Pa»F 171tAih1 1000 C' If.0a*44111 lox Boa 4400 r�'j FT. FAA*1'4 4 P64 __ 1 ocARb v A R#iA . ARed L ic4 4�cA,pfa'Sl,..p'ike u 'R wotio 4 51� 5O+' Ir', 0 � hasSEG' f� a¢c✓v 1a ge-MA1M , parar, 1s M201J om LaveL- Cvcve� 4 4 V. 62cn1,•,) -- -- q1 = 8v �, . _� Il�F��'MATloi.l 1�i FRaM hU�V!Ys " in ._ _��., o � j; •, _ I ra tTs' r�'al 3y r � '�` _2� a c •- -- - PAHT,M f23 OWNB(r JO111�I LMS - ---- p�a.xTrNGr �\ qo' �'�5. ' m qtr ,r .�W 1 � .9 . OF 4. ' �,., ..— Q 4 te"R6j R�.h.� . (16G0�✓) ��'GJ G1 y1El N WA`( 5T, m �0�rI rY�dpa4 1 1}6Vd T" GSTOelWig N { • (1102 Nor? ,, 6KIciT A NaUtiI. ,GdRAcrE To �6 p6NI0i.IhFVE+1 ILo � i 4 OITO Tv t7e A-*A9-eD. bl�lt� �<..r• w �%.� 20' p ; +�ZbIN�� Warn � aFp aaek TR c4 _`7G^ _ f Il.a 1 kF' I Wt67 6R3A 55 90+F tvr.wraaTxl=/0112cu 44 4, RI L qq \" f r AR+6e 11 �doo sp Vc= for.>� {1 G/ , ot<'Ruuocf- Lo JcLoHeRBaD •1'Q'/l2 ourSwFeer " r d a a GR*ss .�gG,gasF 4Ray OR(Ati c+oWC evRlb Yrrr 165 i caBwfoFC'�Naw �.Ipi /c`4gvA'°y•x,l�. x,16./ogMcF II,�I '4"; r^ti ;t44ni:hy;,�e f idfr,P I _ ._-3y,Vr'+t96MK5'tsr12� , �+, Gtf�fk5VotvHB �e4o !0R'ia�raG reel -('kaCzS.r� ,4iS �sMdx+tMt-q°(to1lY7& i R'61K:wAt4L�y2iHudasa-1- -{ _ y v t . k- �---- 13,G YDWHe C' ION rotHQLA Toth- \k UMC- aa'v 1[200* or- _v `L �7� ,a' h 13° 7co 4n">� 12.1 Plt,ak. fAlU4,t4h !gTpLL , -h�srNs I?-o' mnMeT�z x iJ�otlnEvP 12'03 t?GII, rOT VOWW (4IG p ASN aP Gi f'aL { ers A. 119B.sa -ro fofAI Vot,mg, RCR'o - Abor? sr- aEct, 4LfiXz� *09 Vol JMe (VoYI oGO = 12 430 of suu j ` , , .:,.„,' IIS cANO f� DAIE . - - ...r, Y� f Y ONWCI & A's Lt _1_ O 'I 3 WIITEETS hIgG1N� xt :. �r_�a � . - yLtf' : 1 =30 4f 10 116 THE SIT Y'dl �,4 �.Y, 10701 :1 M !2/�WA� t PLAN FF,S ��d1T NI �•I � '--, ' FO 1p v _ _ i rl 777777--7. s..} Ti? SoVTN1r� hUol.K- o UNTY � tJY o -- rlenu8 hG1l.E Isla ry701 ' ,< +n 1 � AREA II 2�Cioo ae FT \� h s (-arJ0il1GA(*d AIWA 4d 2s i2r; Pr 1--- ] �af1r� An�r� Pia P��Vih�a q>7 Hca oerf i aa3 r V O lig JG JO14I(V It � v 71 x O T a hT 3 iti• p` Gi 13 ° g ta' 4v 1 E i I � pL G ERED PAT�•� �•� Hi oe� MT- o eI & LAWLESS _ N M CHIU&S &ENGMEER �" No 10284 - 480 NORTH BROADWAY kc, I s. oFTHe STAT oE�� YO#*(M: .N.Y. 1107( �LCda by '• t� -r&-AMdh A. 6Air6A r.I pkFA1J�0111oV _ ' - _ �� � nT•eaa �Tv �., LvaaTtoN PLAN Vol > 'E '•� �'1 2 �+ � f �� �I�,� � � � 17KT. IoaO mac. a �l.cc 1 fl �j `lb" 1, Ir„s:��� �ug,T4p���a�S 63 A 2 lm09. g' 1 - _ ITE E rLA 4 yv i . � r4 �r Tdt4YGfi� / I! 467 u,F-Falk COOL$ .,VT. r r a kT 1.4 cdruR,exs�l� t f v d, gl Ads , 4&G A, 11 oora 55Q i�D' '.:�k9. 0h41N .- ".:,,._,. �-' �-.3, ,�� esd - ` � F�• 1 ��[� � 0/ v.. _ �, EJ`'1 �l' Ca: '-y�-'11:0 t �'`•1 t , '- ' t - ,i,• Ii P -' o' s !6}"D ¢ dyiQ 20 XO 4ca 0ILL V ^srwflt$tiJ17.t 4 T N * .��, � �'� �,,,,' ,,.yak. ♦ .T-3 i� QL -le 1 . } , .. ., �-- nievr IG 6900 To 94-wri , r;PA rs HCdTJ r hlsa GL h uc 4 pa � �r r V Nwe/ GF4naS / DIST. cw,TvurL i ,`♦ � n t �� �, � � � �1 �' 1 , . . 'k ' z'1 1NFo�MATlo61 Ih FY-cN hUK�lBYs �r1 •. T2v-wv. JAN 7•UYL r, C% r�. 1�,, ., ��1” r . , �• - I�FiG 14 I'183 � hP12 f2, t`P"IS r„ Co I' 4 �5 3 2a a q5 OwNE� JOHN- ZI �I's - co .A5u4GTT- 41WB6gtKotIV ChTo IG I o ty � I OLt4 o E i fd 1 I� D� s , p. "� 1�, 4 - - 20� NtQI - >71CAINperE pdTA 6 K I . ¢, M f� 0 8 'w • , — W 5 as =00A.m x 9 a �a q ria, � '�""� �bn+�� d� O �I1 Adao f Vi C? ,qti ( / I R24b a 1 12 o,*6 -r WCFF, /FILUFIa FF .� VaLoHG I, t 1 r 0' I � FCor lit } J f OIL i t� L g0 1 r-' ^' ( feF Mew Int ryrx, x,15 o c i F c � h 4 1�Tc"tz- r- T » . . 't1 I""�k,,Gt _� k' CP.t� \, VoLUM Err o -/ `M ✓r>r� Kce 1 l 1 ' alrt A � i a:° L P a- S3- — a I 13 w R 'FaA N 12 PIAN 7ER. 11.0 P N t ERE6 ARC 1 �ys.c1Liklkl kALL R , ��' f2y3 'Nov, fl%�T VoWM2 � hAh,tJ Q�G�SRS e. ,.ny, Fcl 10 W x z 1 e 0 z o s 8 v Of. M is , 0 T nI.0 Fi �Q O OGl f m m T J 11,8 G .v. dL �Ctyonl 1/0► !Me (RoYI = /? 480 or- 11, f 1, oar :. � ■�y'y'�'M�Y L. 11{f4� "`�- 1 1) 6t7t��P uaMTvVRS AS PSR y 1VLAr� I ' 1 h qi. cOlmtjeHT6 '1.15.64 , I µ. r Gt 1 ."1"1 . ,1* d, RPv1Sen A :TS.'8�ENICa�N 1 ly (E • =✓ �) CortttENTS �• 21.81 ©f Z y,� C y - - yrs - ._ _ . . _ 4jA R 3 .'sT��/� ���i ����� r � 4✓ -Fvr, , _ ..p,.�.- RFVLCAP � P.2 'SOUTH otone u,�liis aallo LAINTIF IS G .1�_ 1 NOV �EXHIBR NO FO IOENTIFIOATIbN a ���a 9r g, ATE. PPS .. l I i T 5 MwYv1A'` ah"1 q�k v :!.r`-t„" ti �.eE - ' n�-0iY. 'R' "4��T ?! FII '. t _` 1 ✓4Arfi ii :nf,Yy}AX J x xM� 4 � 1�41v . r�ii a a, rz vJ".1V �-vy-��"H' x C (- ,ir, W ss My� �I�AII/LiI�ZIAL 1 t 7 ° —4 e�l�ruseeri ' F'Ifi PA I? hGD � Ills 30Y A I 2 GloO 7q FT yq i i� .' h ,Y� ii Y Y �hh1�yGAf � ?17�a (rEce a4F2f fa I At4rIPC PSA r(U)VIY) o Goo *q r t r i & P&RKIH6t FLUUISR-I45r Da6fwLwr)5 i IZ T(L6E5 wSLV6i%u Q SkdnE MA57tC1g 27 t'n.xCS p I -.44Nmol`Il O 0 ZoTe L 3I —t • � V AM1EGS 10 W411-K IV/ Xp; to i V'XN Y Via, a, a% X� � ♦ li , - 1s 9LVER114 — q bJ�It.bRFXaI 1 I �,� • T Z fIIAE ra 7E' 0 °I r l� p It q A -FEvwcMn6( 'lk*wob CTILpS`a X. . i .m ^ro— •-r —^ammo--I—m^ n, ... r Eu 7 ` ' y "I 'r ru. 1 .. 1�1 i u - i�°•i Axa" " _—' — a'i ND MQGJ'��i'� d" i } � [ � �'a •i t� V 1t � + ,. *4 '4 ir7� e Off I " � �'� k '�!"Rr 1"T ^i ,ql� .'-h P �. . �' aS�y.ry�_ ,n'T }.�, ' rx'it �" 4�� YY � � fi ➢ ��'" - hr< d ,w 1.-1 44G '-�• C ,�+� S,NAYJE:.MXVIR;(a 'TRy S \StERED ARC/y� (,�' tea•-v��Tv'2`L. P_�'+°cr1E't�"�''..- ' Q�� gat E• �a� zr� 2l TOTAL m ,yny/ //G 9 tx ♦ .-r xN y A >< �', rJ f b, k.l Y �� _ ., pF \ TINE ST PSE s a J w� _: a wr< ,✓,h _lir. /'!R' _ �HIKL'rfTS ['GtL ala P5.8 rx 4, ' � N3 1 Y//8 p 1 Ii 1 y " her lr-. .v- _�s...5-�• y..^...�a,.,...�.+-.V_...Y.,,.....-+..a.-��. .��r.,V...- .-_ _'•.14 .�...-�...-,_.-.r.�}.i�«.•-a�vL.✓-.J+'n.uwr3.._ i f ._._.,�..,-......�-�....�r.rr�..r....._...�-r._-.....-�-,•..---.-..ur ....�, ..�,.. , _ .._v 'r..-._��w.�W-J._.+w.+v ..YJ.__wvJ-r.__.r .__--+_,,.�...-�—..-•-_w...-�_�.. -w--.....-._......,�.......-v--..�.•._-.,J f I 1000 - 44 - 01 - 4 — EVAN W. MC LAVE , 73 NORTH RD. ,SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 G °T 5 — CIARA NISSENFELD , 222 4 ST., GREENPORT , N.Y. 11944 / KATHERINE S L A N D S 0 D N D 7 - ROSINA CUNNINGHAM 553285 NORTH O RD.H, SOUTHOLD SOUTHOLD 1971 1971 8 - BERTHA S. ROCKEFELLER , 500 BLAUVELT RD. , BLAUVELT , N.Y. 10913 9 - ARAAK 11 AND TERJANIAN,SO-19 135th ST. , KEW GARDENS , N.Y. 11435 10 - DONALD B ROSALIE CAVALUZZI , 92 MURRAY DRIVE , WESTBURY , N.Y. 11590 11 - HENRY P. PETERSON , 68 NORTH RD. , SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 12 GENEVIEVE d AND THOMPSON , 980 GRANT AVE. , PELHAM MANOR , N.Y. 10803 13 - JOHN XIKIS , 32 - 55 STEINWAY ST. , ASTORIA , N.Y. 11102 14 - ANDREW GRILLQS , 1749 E. 16th ST., BROOKLYN N.Y. 11229 15 - ROBERT DIETRICH , BOX 64 NORTH RD. , SOUTHOLD , N.Y.11971 16 - DAVID d ORS CORWIN, GREENPORT, N.Y. 11944 pµELL _ / pwEu 17 - LAZAROZ LASKOS , 1026 INWOOD TERRACE , FT. LEE , N.J. 07024 srep � py.'E LL. pWELL; pWELL. pWELL. pwELL. � 18 - HIRANT CANDAN 56 - 38 BELL. BLVD. , BAYSIDE , N.Y. 11364 O O 21 19 - NICHOLAS 0. YUELYS , 3240 TIBBETT AVE. , BRONX , N.Y. 10463 I O 13 16 17 18 19 20 O O O O g 10 II 12 Iq 15 200 20 — ALPHONSE M. ATWAN , 50 WIMBLETON LA. , GREAT NECK , N.Y. 11020 21 — JANET T. 8 ANO WAESCHE , 9848 ABERDEEN DR. , SHAWNEE MISSION , KS. 66206 1000 - 44 - 01 MI DD L E ROAD ( NORTH ROAD,) ( C. R. 48 ) 1000 - 44 - 03 - I zoo ' so ' wIDE ) — — — JOHN XIKIS , 32 - 55 STEINWAY ST. , ASTORIA , N.Y. 11102 ° 03EOE . N. 76 ' " 3 D.00' _ 2 - JOHN G. POLIWODA , NORTH RD. , SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 _ _ _- — — — 3 - JOHN G. POLIWODA , NORTH RD. , SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 1000 52 - 03 - 4.2 - DOROTHY SNYDER , 17 FAIRLAWN LANE , CENTEREACH , N.Y. 11720 24 2rJ pwEu, pAR. pwE u. 4.3 - SOUTHOLD VENTURES INC. , 17 FAIRLAWN LANE , CENTEREACH , N.Y.11720 23 SI, 4E LL. 1000 - 52 - 03 . - I o I °o O q,2 15 - ANTUAN 8 VIRGINIA KILICIAN 54030 WOODMAN AVE. VAN NUYS CAL. DAA. 1 2 26 M O M1 16 — JOHN T. NAPPI , 7 SPINNING WHEEL LANE , DIX HILLS , N.Y. 11746 rc, I 17 — LUIGI PERINUZZI 20 62 48th ST. , LONG ISLAND CITY , N.Y. 11105 VACANT 18 - LUIGI MARINUCCI , 140 - 44 QUINCE AVE, , FLUSHING , N.Y.11355 23 - HARUTYUN KUZUKOGLU , 135 - 10 GRAND CENTRAL PKWY., JAMAICA , N.Y. 11435 I 24 — ZAKARIYA GUNUSEN , 32 COLONIAL DR. , FARMINGDALE , N.Y. 11735 sNEp 25 ARAKSI KALENDERIAN 8 ASADUR KLIJIAN 600 LORRAINE CT. , ENGLEWOOD , N.J. 07631 STONY SHORE DR . El VACANT 26 - PETER PAPANTONIOU , NORTH RD. BOX 89 , SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 ( 50' WIDE pWeu. CL 27 3 27 — ALFRED CAIOLA 2330 LODOYICK AVE. , BRONX , N.Y. 10469 43 28 — NICHOLAS TZOUMAS 28 - OB 29th ST. , LONG ISLAND CITY , N.Y. 11102 29 — SAHAK OZDEMIRCI , 5 CARR PL. , TOTOWA , N.J. 07512 30 `oo W, 30 - JOHN URONTOS 562 84h ST. , BROOKLYN , N.YJI209 u O ° 0 32 - JOHN VITELAS 147 - 21 HOOVER AVE. , JAMAICA , N.Y. 11435 T ' z w 33 - CHRISTOS TULUMBA 20 - 29 WHITESTONE EXPWY. , WHITESTONE , N.Y. 11357 34 — JOHN T. CORNELL 74 SYCAMORE CIRCLE , STONY BROOK , N.Y. 11790 - I 28 1 I I ` pWELL ( S,76 - 03'20"W 300 00' P I r , a 6 200 RADIUS MAP OF PROPERTY 91� V ANT / AT ARSHAMOMOQUE O 'so W ; VACANT 3z TOWN OF SOUTHOLD = SUFFOLK C OUNTY'N. Y. C 1000 - 44 - 09 - 01 SCALE 1" = 60' JAN. 6 , 1988 � I I Y b O / E 01988 D M 0UTHOLD O / PLANNING BOARD AREA 2. 5826 ACRES 15 t Icj , t t �' / B ' - RESIDENCE IOOO - rJ 2 - 03 - BUILDING ZONE DISTRICT O O O_ O SCHOOL DISTRICT, 10 ;1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT FIRE DISTRICT, 28 , 31 jll LAND+.G DESCRBES THE USES OF T�HEYPROPERTY SASROROUNDIIF. G1,1 SUBJ PREMISES .. O 9 LIC. NO. 49668 i trc ENGINEERS, P.C. •`PLhIN11Ff S 1 'I 516) " - EENIerr i1P�', f0 IpeN Ip TION I P. O. 'BO WTE p „11 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. -41971 - 87 - 793 CK