Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-40.-5-1 (3) S4' SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS S41 November 7, 1988 my - 91988 ; Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman SOUTHOLD TOWN � Southold Planning Board ( PLANNING BOARD 3 Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Cedarfields/Mooresland Submission of 13 and 14 Oct 88 Dear Ben: We have reviewed the submissions noted above and find that they are little more than rehash of what we have already seen. None of the points raised in our Memo of 13 July in the second paragraph on the well have been addressed (copy enclosed) . It is again noted that the public comment period cannot even begin, in our opinion, until this data has been submitted and accepted to complete the DEIS. We repeat that insufficient data is contained in the record with regard to the future ability of the well in its present location. Sincerely, SZEPATOWSRI ASSOCIATES, INC. lljc-v David J.S. Emilita, AICP Principal Planner DJSE:mt Enclosure 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 f feE S4■ SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS & PLANNERS NOV ' 9 1988 sou1Ho_D r 11-11-14 MEMORANDUM PLAidr!i 'G EG--RD TO: Southold Files FROM: Diane M. Schpltze, SAI DATE: July 21, 1988 RE: Cedarfields/Moeresland Meeting Notes of July 13, 1988 David Emilita and Diane Schultze from SAI met with Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner and Merlon E. Wiggin, consultant for the applicant, John Costello, to discuss the affordable housing/town house proposal located at Greenport. Councilwoman Jean Cochran was also in attendance. Mr. Costello arrived late since the meeting began earlier than scheduled. This proposal was -previously reviewed and denied approval from the Village of Greenport to hook up into the sewer system. However, the Village of Greenport has reactivated the proposal and the project is continuing. Mr . Wiggin questioned the procedure from this juncture in order to reactivate the file with the Town. It was noted that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and 2 supplements had been prepared by the applicant. The latest supplement was submitted in June of 1987. When negotiations with the Village ended there was no further review of the supplements submitted since the project could not proceed without Village approval for sewer hookups . Mr . Emilita pointed out that technically the supplement has not been accepted as complete for review. The main concern with regard to the proposal was the well site situated in the middle of the high density development . The future of the well had to be considered. In review of the information submitted, Mr . Emilita found that the calculations were not sufficient to determine that the well would be acceptable and there was no engineers stamp on the work . It was also felt that if approval from the Village for the sewer was not obtained the well could not work with individual septic systems. N Mr . Emilita requested a larger zone map for the zone of concentration. He also pointed out that there was a contradiction in the report between the zone and the area recharged. Recharge calculations need to be based on `furtheT �{L,.�f. land use within the zone of concentration. Locations of all nearby public wells also need to be shown. Their recharge zones 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 should be shown so as to reveal any overlaps. Mr. Costello stated that in recent talks with the Village, they may accept up-front money rather than a well within the proposal. It was felt that if water hookup can be obtained with out"�'an on-site well then the project would be acceptable. The traffic report in the recent supplement was acceptable. - - - - Mr. -Emilita -stated thatthedrainage calculations had not been checked to date, however, they would be reviewed. There was also discussion with regard to the sidewalks as requested by the Planning Board and whether the project could accommodate them wi=th the swale drainage system proposed. It was felt that if the width could be reduced, they could be constructed on one side of the road within the right-of-way. A meeting will be scheduled with the applicant and the Highway Superintendent to discuss this as per the Highway Specifications. S41 SZt PA10N'SKI ASSOCIATES INC. INVIRONMJ4 JAI COnbt.Ilu IN n vle�\I K• SqC-_ L Town Hall, 53095 Main Road 0.. P.O. Box 1179 0� Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 24 , 1988 David Emilita SAI 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, Rhode Island 02835 RE: Cedarfields Afforadable Housing project SCTM #1000-40-5-1 Dear Dave: Enclosed please find a list of chronological events on the above mentioned project. Would you please review and refer your comments to the Planning Board. Thank You. e Ver truly yours, �n f/ BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN jt AI � � • PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultan R M Bootley Alley P.O.Box 672 L5 U Greenport,New York 11944 D D (516)477-0030 Fax (516)477-0198 OC18 October 14 , 1988 SOHTHOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Cedarfields Affordable Housing Project and Mooresland Town House Project . In an attempt to bring the SEQRA Process for this project to a logical conclusion , especially as it represents an Affordable Housing Project , enclosed is a list of chronological events , actions taken , and the resultant responses which hopefully will result in the conclusions of the required actions . 1 . April 24 , 1987 - D. E. I . S. Submitted . 2 . June 25 , 1987 - At the request of the Planning and David Emilita , a Supplement to the D. E. I . S. containing groundwater impact ( Nitrates ) , drainage calculations , and peak hour traffic study . 3 . July 16 , 1987 - Resolution by the Southold Town Planning Board accepting both the D. E. I . S. and the Supplement as complete and accurate for review (copy attached ) . 4 . July 29 , 1987 - Submittal of planning consultants review of July 8 , 1987 . 5 . August 7 , 1987 - Response to planning consultants review comments . No record of acceptance of same . 6 . August 10 , 1987 - Public hearing on the D. E. I . S. The Planning Board minutes of this date reflect that there were no written comments received on the D. E. I . S. , and the only comment requiring action is from Dave Emilita , which is "There is still no calculated evidence that the well will work , and I would like the Southold Town Planning Board October 14 , 1988 Page 2 record to so state that the subject is still not sufficiently treated for the purpose of SEQRA. We have not taken a hard look as to why this well will work . " 7 . August 21 , 1987 - Record of meeting with Sidney Bowne on August 19th in regard to the methodology and calculation of drainage requirements for the project (copy attached ) . Verbal approval was given by Sidney Bowne that this was a very acceptable method of determining drainage requirements , with the possible question as to the need to perform on-site soils tests to determin the permeability coefficient . 8 . August 25 , 1987 - Action by Southold Town Planning Board approving the Preliminary Map for the sub-division subject to : 1 ) adequate response to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ( D. E. I . S. ) in regard to potable water ; 2 ) provision of adequate storm drainage and roadway in accordance with the Town of Southold Highway Standards ; 3 ) provision for sidewalks ; 4 ) approval from the Town ' s Consulting Engineer ( copy attached ) . 9 . August 31 , 1987 - Letter to the Planning Board from Peconic Associates requesting clarification and assistance as to what was required in regard to potable water , and request for clarification on the use of drainage swales versus curbs and leaching basins and acceptance of drainage calculation methodology . No record of a response (copy attached ) . 10. October 8, 1987 - Request from the Planning Board to Donald Bracken to request a sixty ( 60 ) day extension for the Planning Board to prepare a Final Environmental Impact Statement (copy ' r i Southold Town Planning Board October 14 , 1988 Page 3 attached ) . Have no record that this request was ever received . It was also about this time that the developer requested a delay in doing the perculation tests , primarily , I understand , because of the uncertainty of having both water and sewer available from the Village of Greenport . 11 . Between the above and the following , the major acitivity of concern was trying to get a resolvement and a committment as to the availability of water and sewer for subject project . 12. May 17 , 1988 - Request to the Planning Board for verification that the SEQRA Process was complete based on previous responses (copy attached ) . No record of a reply . 13. July 13 , 1988 - Action by the Southold Town Planning Board to have Dave Emilita review the Supplement to the D. E . I . S. dated June 25 , 1988. This is a typo , as the Supplement was dated June 25 , 1987 and previously , by a resolution by the Board on July 16 , 1987 , resolved that Dave Emilita to determine that both the D . E. I . S. and the Supplement were complete . 14. July 13 , 1988 - In anticipation of the above , met with representatives of the Planning Board to review items necessary to complete the D. E. I . S. Items discussed include the following : a . Zone of influence for the proposed well . It was indicated that this was not complete as it did not cover all of the areas within the zone . The zone of influence calculations have been revised and a copy enclosed as an attachment . t Southold Town Planning Board October 14 , 1988 Page 4 b . Question about the acceptance of the on-site well . Reported to the Planning Board the H2M engineering report on the proposed well number 10 (well on the Costello property ) dated June 1987 , which concluded that the test results indicated that the well had a capacity of 250 G. P. M. , and recommended its acceptance by the Village of Greenport for additional potable water supply . As and added note , application for the well has been made to D. E. C . . Also , this project is within the Village of Greenport ' s water franchise area . c . There was a considerable amount of discussion in regard to the pavement widths and the requirements for sidewalks . John Costello was requested to provide some supportive type data on what other affordable housing projects did for road widths and sidewalks . The same was submitted on September 1 , 1988. Copy of the transmittal letter is attached . No record of a response . 15 . August 1988 - The decision was made by John Costello to go ahead and have the soil permeability tests done . These were completed and the results were received on September 7 , 1988 , a copy of which is enclosed . The borings were taken in six ( 6 ) locations which represent the location of the inground drainage leaching systems . All sites , except two ( 2 ) indicated that the permeability rate was in excess of that used in the draft calculation of August 21 , 1987 . Permeability at the B- 1 and B-2 sites Southold Town Planning Board October 14 , 1988 Page 5 was 2 X 10-3 centimetels per second , instead of the 1 X 10 used in the calculations . Based on the above the leaching pools at these two (2 ) sites are being changed from four (4 ) feet deep to eight (8) feet deep and being surrounded by a backfill of graded stone . The above modifications at these two (2 ) locations will result in added adequate drainage capability with a safety factor in excess of 1 .4. 16 . October 1988 - As a response had not been received on pavement widths and sidewalks . John Costello went ahead and suggested a revision to the Site Plan showing sidewalks on one ( 1 ) side and on certain roads in the Cedarfields area . These sidewalks will be three ( 3 ) feet wide and located adjacent to the pavement between the pavement header curb and the swail . Plan views and typical sections are enclosed . Hopefully , the above recapulation and the enclosed documents will complete the SEQRA process on this urgently needed affordable housing project . If you have any further questions , or if I can be of assistance , please do not hesitate to get in touch . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC . erlon E.9W 1;�gPh . D. ,M. E. President Enclosures : As per text . cc : Mr . John Costello MEW/iw �S�EFOt,(r�o o C= Town Hall, 53095 Main Road v' P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 t71t TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Ray Jacobs, Highway Superintendent FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner RE: Cedarfields Affordable Housing Proposal, Greenport DATE: August 15, 1988 I am writing to ask your assistance in resolving a problem that has arisen within the above-named project. The Planning Board wishes to provide a safe off-the-road walkway (sidewalks) for children along one side of the streets in the Affordable Housing District. However, the design specifications for drainage on the site call for swaled roads to be built. While the construction of curbed roads would make it easier to provide sidewalks, they also would require the relocation of Greenport Village' s pump station, an expense and aggravation the Planning Board and the applicant wish to avoid. Therefore, the swaled road must be used to provide drainage. But, there is no provision in the Highway Specifications Code for the placement of a 3 ' or 4 ' sidewalk within one side of the drainage swale. In my conversation with Merle Wiggin, the engineer for the applicant, he expressed a willingness to redesign the drainage swale on one side of the road so as to allow for the inclusion of a 4 ' sidewalk within the Town right-of-way without compromising the integrity of the drainage swale itself. Any such change in the design specifications would require your approval. Before the Planning Board proceeds further, it requests your review and input as to how this particular problem might be addressed. kxdz:ez� jd Highway Department D Town of Southold AM am Peconic Lane Peconic, N.Y. 11958INO'OOW RAYMOND L.JACOBS I el. 765-3140 Superintendent 734-521 1 AUG 3 0 X988 August 29 , 1988 SOUTH BOARD Ms . Valerie ScoDaz Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , New York 11971 Re : Cedarfields Affordable Housing Proposal Dear Ms . Scopaz : I have been in contact with Merle Wiggin in regard to the placement of a 3 ' or 4 ' side- walk within one side of the drainage swale in the above referenced housing proposal . Mr . Wiggin will be sending me a written proposal of change for my review at which time I will suggest recommendations or forward my approval of his design specifications . Res/ l ectfullY , Ra mond L . Sac s Superintendent of Highways JOHN COSTELLO-LAND January 25, 1967 Assessment $14 , 400. 48 acres @ $300 per acre= 14,400. Taxes: 5,000 . 100 .+ per acre Southold 90 . Cost per acre = 10,417 Purchased Jan. 23 , 1985 Cost = 500 ,000. Amortization ( full price) 776. 383 Interest 10yrs @ 9 1/2°s Taxes 10 yrs ( 5000 x llyrs) 55,000. Improvements 7 ,000 sq ft x $150.= 1050,000. Total max. cost 1 ,881 ,383 . 168 Units - Average land cost $11,199. 84 Affordable 1991 - 5yrs (AHD) $30,147 X 84 = 2, 532,348. (High) 60,000 X 84 = 5,040,000. 7 , 572 ,348 . Note 22 max (2 acre) V/S 168 r -- S41 SEP/ (ATTTOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS & PLANNERS N� w 5 P S4Jl7l 1 %ANNING BOARD MEMORANDUM TO: Southold Files FROM: Diane M. Schultze, SAI DATE: July 21, 1988 RE: Cedarfields/Mooresland Meeting Notes of July 13, 1988 David Emilita and Diane Schultze from SAI met with Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner and Merlon E. Wiggin, consultant for the applicant, John Costello, to discuss the affordable housing/town house proposal located at Greenport. Councilwoman Jean Cochran was also in attendance. Mr. Costello arrived late since the meeting began earlier than scheduled. This proposal was previously reviewed and denied approval from the Village of Greenport to hook up into the sewer system. However, the Village of Greenport has reactivated the proposal and the project is continuing. Mr. Wiggin questioned the procedure from this juncture in order to reactivate the file with the Town. It was noted that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and 2 supplements had been prepared by the applicant. The latest supplement was submitted in June of 1987. When negotiations with the Village ended there was no further review of the supplements submitted since the project could not proceed without Village approval for sewer hookups. Mr. Emilita pointed out that technically the supplement has not been accepted as complete for review. The main concern with regard to the proposal was the well site situated in the middle of the high density development. The future of the well had to be considered. In review of the information submitted, Mr. Emilita found that the calculations were not sufficient to determine that the well would be acceptable and there was no engineers stamp on the work. It was also felt that if approval from the Village for the sewer was not obtained the well could not work with individual septic systems. Mr. Emilita requested a larger zone map for the zone of concentration. He also pointed out that there was a contradiction in the report between the zone and the area recharged. Recharge calculations need to be based on further land use within the zone of concentration. Locations of all nearby public wells also need to be shown. Their recharge zones 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 should be shown so as to reveal any overlaps. Mr. Costello stated that in recent talks with the Village, they may accept up-front money rather than a well within the proposal. It was felt that if water hookup can be obtained with out an on-site well then the project would be acceptable. The traffic report in the recent supplement was acceptable. Mr. Emilita stated that the drainage calculations had not been checked to date, however, they would be reviewed. There was also discussion with regard to the sidewalks as requested by the Planning Board and whether the project could accommodate them with the swale drainage system proposed. It was felt that if the width could be reduced, they could be constructed on one side of the road within the right-of-way. A meeting will be scheduled with the applicant and the Highway Superintendent to discuss this as per the Highway Specifications. S41 SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS & PLANNERS S1 m _ _ �FFO(l( `* P T D S Y Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 13, 1988 Merle Wiggins one Bootleg Ally Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Ceder Fields SCTM #1000-40-5-1 Dear Mr. Wiggins: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 11, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board ask David Emilita_---R in Consultant, to review the supplement to DEIS dated' ne 5 19 for this major subdivision. This parcel is located at Moores Lane, Greenport. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ,iY7 Very truly yours, ORLOWSKI ,JR. CHAIRMAN jt cc: Dave Emilita PECONIC AmCIATM INC. L•ngineering, Murine & Energy COnSU1101 l6 P.O. Bua67' Groenit Environmental Planning gr� gar y nla+rl.NeW Yurk I!'1kM (S 16)477am May 17, 19881 Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman ou�ti, (d 70-- Southold Town Planning Board 'JUN 2 3 19818 ,01n17C Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L. I . New York - 11944 Re : Cedarfields Affordable Nousing and Mooresland Dear Mr. Orlowski : As it is very possible that sewer treatment capacity may be made available for subject project in the near future, we are anxious to make sure that the Planning Board ' s phase of this project is complete so that it could be ready to go. 1 . According to my records , the SEQRA process was complete except have been unable to locate the final determination letter. 2. We have two (2 ) letters of response to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services which we are answering immediately. 3. Would you provide a list of any other items that. according to your records , have been left incomplete. Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E. ,Wiggin. Ph.D. ,M. E. President MEWhw � S�FFu�c P D ti � T LD S y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 29, 1987 Merlon Wiggin, President Peconic Associates 1 Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Cedarfields-Moorelands DEIS Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has scheduled the above referenced proposal for two hearings on August 10th. Enclosed is a copy of the Planning Consultant's review of the draft environmental impact statement. Note that there are still some unanswered questions particulary those which are noted in the second paragraph. It would be most helpful if you could provide this information prior to the August 10th hearing. At the least, be prepared to answer these questions in detail at the hearing. Very truly yours, �uxncl� 9,�A�usku, �t. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS July 8, 1987 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Cedarfields-Moorelands DEIS Dear Bennett, We have reviewed the Supplement to the DEIS dated June 25, 1987 and find that together with the DEIS itself, the DEIS plus supplement are complete and adequate for review and public comment. We continue to have reservations about the sufficiency of analysis with regard to the long term viability of the proposed well. Specifically, it is implied that only' the proposed project will have any recharge impact within the zone of influence of the proposed well. This project does not exist in isolation within the zone of influence. There are (presumebly) other existing land uses and surely additional development will take place within the well' s radius. The DEIS does not address these uses. The well will also need DEC approval as well as SCDHS approval. We call this to your attention as a coordinated review with these two agencies will be extremely important on this issue. The assessment of traffic and drainage impacts will be addressed during the comment period. We are available for consultation on the above points. Sincerely, EPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES, .7,NC. _ fr RECEIVED BY David J.S. Emilita, AICD SGUiN01D 101SN PIAL"N11 BOARD Principal Pl er JUL 10 1987 DATE DJSE/kb 23 Nara?anscit a,r. t:-ne—r;.,n. RI 07." 35 (:101) 423-0430 p PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Booticy Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 September 1 , 1988 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Affordable Housing . Dear Mr . Orlowski : During a meeting several weeks ago on affordable housing , Valarie asked John Costello and myself if we could develop some information on other affordable housing projects in regard to sidewalks , street width , and so forth . Enclosed are highlighted pages from various affordable housing projects that deal directly with the above items . You will note that the most savings have come from reducing the street width , the elimination of sidewalks or including them as part of the road shoulder , and the use of swales for drainage . It has been attempted to incorporate all of the above in recent affordable housing layouts . It is our opinion that consideration of some of these options would not only insure that affordable housing can be built and kept affordable , but also will make it more possible to have such things as basements and garages , which in my opinion is much more important , not only for the prospective occupant , but also for the maintenance and appearance of the affordable housing community . Another suggestion on one of these projects is the combined sewer line for two (2 ) houses and the installation of the water shut-off in the water meter pit , both of which would result in additional savings . m Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. September 1 , 1988 Page 2 In the interest of proceeding on the affordable housing projects , your early review and possible action on the above would be greatly appreciated by all . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. rlon E. :1hggih . D. ,M. E. � President Enclosures cc : Herbert R. Mandel John Costello Isaac Saidmehr Raymond Jacobs MEW/iw ASSOCIATES a Subsidiary of _ ^ Charles R Velzy Assooietes,Inc. Consulting Engineers RECEIVED BW' EJC U N 1 C A S S O C I AT E S Q INC. One Old Country Road,Suit e 430 Carle Place,New York 11514 LB TOWN WH6 BW Telephone:(516)742-8831 ` ON 2 9 laa& DATE Peconic Associates, Inc. Engineering and Planning Consultants June 29 , 1988 ono Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport, New York 11944 .516-477—UU3U Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Cedarfields/Mooresland Affordable Housing Project Greenport , New York Dear Mr . Orlowski : It is our understanding that you will be conducting a work session on subject project this afternoon , which may include the subject of sidewalks . Reference is made to the attached letter of August 21 , 1987 . The present site plan was developed by the use of drainage swales and leaching basins . If the decision was made to change to sidewalks , which are not compatible with the drainage swales , then it would be necessary to redesign the project to a piped drainage system. This was considered early on in the project , but was determined unfeasible because of the interference with the inverts of storm drains with that of the sewer lines . The location of the sewer lines are severely restrictive because of the available invert at the Village of Greenport ' s existing lift station . Placing the storm drains lines beneath the sewer lines would result in a portion of the storm drain lines being below groundwater level , causing flow to be restricted . It was therefore determined that it would be a physical impossibility to install the piped storm drain system and the sewer lines without replacement of the Village ' s lift station . Being an affordable housing project , cost was also a consideration , and the replacement of the lift station and the installation of a pipe drainage system is estimated to increase the project cost from approximately Three Hundred Fifty to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars , as well cause a significant delay in the design and added expense for same. Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. Page 2 June 29 , 1988 In light of the above , request that the drainage swale/ leaching basin concept be retained . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E. Wiggi h . D. , M. E. President cc : Mr. John Costello Mr. Roger Wilhelm MEW/iw i PECONIC ASSOCIATES. INC. ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANTS One Bootle$ Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 Telephone: IS 16) 477-0030 August 21 , 1987 ASSOCIATES: Fairwenlhei/Brown Architects Gannet Fleming FMr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman ilginr Southold Town Planning Bgard R.P. Munow& Associales Southold Town Hall wineryDsign Main Road Planners Last Southold , L . I . EnrirnnnnvntalPlamring New York - 11971 Wilhelm Adanlic Co. I•inancia/Planning Re : Site Drainage - Cedarfields/Mooresland. Dear Mr. Orlowski : On August 19th , 1987 , Nancy Harrington and the writer met with Bob Brown and John Cahn of Sidney Bowne in Smithtown , to discuss a different site drainage system for Cedarfields/Mooresland. We were advised that despite the previous understanding of using swales that a member of the Planning Board had recommended that they be eliminated and go to a more conventional drainage system, namely , storm drains and drainage system to convey storm water off the site. Consequently , the swales are to be removed and curbs installed . The initial proposal was to pipe the storm water from Cedarfields to Moores Drain (outlet of Silver Lake ) or out to Moores Lane and South on Moores Lane to the point that the Moores Drain crosses Moores Lane. Discussion on this method of site drainage included the physical impossibility to place the cross street drains above the sanitary lines because of the minimum slope and invert elevations necessary to gain entry into the Village of Greenport ' s pumping station , and , if the drain was placed beneath the sanitary line , it would be very difficult to get a clear outflow without being in ground water. Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. August 21 , 1987 Page 2 Added to this was the expressed concerns about getting Village of Greenport easement approval and D. E.C. wetlands approval prior to early next year. As an alternative , we suggested the New York State D.O.T. design formulas for leaching basins be used as follows : with Kt the transmission zone hydraulic conductivity and Qt providing the cumulative flow out of the leaching basin at any time. In these formulas , the Ks ( Saturated Soil Permeability ) is the most important factor to be determined based on permeability coefficient ranges . From soils data from Riverhead Sub-Strata this is expected to range from 10•' to 10-' , with an average of 10•' . Because of the concern in regard to the actual capability of the basins , it was recommended that the soils be actually tested to determine its permeability coefficient. Eighteen ( 18) tests are planned and it should take approximately two ( 2 ) to three ( 3 ) weeks to get the test results , after which the calculations can be completed and the exact number of leaching basins can be determined. The previously submitted drainage calculations are to be voided and new ones based on the above to be provided in approximately four (4) to five ( 5 ) weeks . An example of determining leaching and storage capability as used in the above method is attached. You will note that there is a safety factor of 1 .4 and in addition we only propose to use a four (4 ) foot head , which is half of the depth of the proposed leaching basin. Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. August 21 , 1987 Page 3 The proposed run-off calculation is based on 2.5 inches per hour , or a twenty-five (25) year storm. It was suggested , that if possible , that we should increase the drainage system capability to handle 3 1 /2 inches in one ( 1 ) hour to provide some additional safety factors , which would approximate to a one hundred ( 100) year storm. Respectfully submitted , PECO�N, IC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E. Wiggin , Ph. D. ,M. E. President cc : Mrs . Nancy Harrington Diane Carroll Donald Bracken Sidney Bowne Associates ■■■■■■■■ems■■�■■■mom ■ ■■■■■■r■■Mom■■■mom "PUT, awW�WffjNpr-vM ■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■■n■■ .MEN.■■■O!l11■YI.�!!MY ■ ■■ .■■■■■■ ■.■■■■■■■■ n K*. w■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ N■®Re■■■n■■"■"■xpl ! INN I�Y■■■■NZW. lAlf�J ■■r■■■■■■lzn - lxMai3 SIMON WMEMN ■■■■■■■UMMI■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■�■■■■�■■■■■■■■ momown mow■■■ �■ mow■■■ ■■� ■r■Yr 'Li■■■■■■■■■■■■■ : . . ., ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ �i■■■■■■■i■■■■i■■■■■■■i■■■■ C . I111.. . .1!!■I�II�.II�1■i��E■®�!!/1�i►l��I��!.!!!�� .. ��■■�■rte . ,�+���■■��■�! . . .................. g�EFD(,{��, P D T LD S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT March 30 , 1987 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency does hereby determine that the action described below is Type I and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Proposal is for a site plan for 84 townhouses on 22 acres located at Moore ' s Lane and County Route 48 , Greenport to be referred to as "Mooresland" , tax map no. 1000-40-5-p/o 1. Copies mailed to Henry Williams,DEC Commissiner NYS DEC at Stonybrook Suffolk County Department of Health SErvices Suffolk County Planning Commissin Francis J. Murphy, Superivsor Merlon Wiggin, Agent FEBRUARY 24, 1987 2 -, L:ontracting, and John Costello. Hardly one that anybody could construe to be a conflict of interest here, and also I have no business relationship with the prop^_--_d developers or contractors on this subdivision. There are no agreements or permits or anything in effect that would construe that this would be a conflict and that I would gain any advantage to this zone change. Thank you. COUNCILMAN STOUTENBURGH: I'd like to make a statement here. First again, with your indulgence, let me again reassure you my strong support for affordable housing. Few people could be against that concept. On the other hand, this support comes with certain restrictions attached to it: One would be not to overburden Greenport water supply, that is already pushed to its limits by new development. Also, creating additional salt water intrusion by this use of water into an already sensitive and limited Greenport water area. It has been reported that the new well at Brecknock Hall has been found to have salt in' it 'and this well, like the proposed Costello well, was to booster the Gre_enport's limited supply of water. And three, that Costello will be ' sewered, which means all that sewer water will be pumped into Long Island Sound, as all sewer water is; and not go back into the ground through cesspools, if the density were one acre or more, therefore building up the water supply below us, and we all do this in our own homes, most of us anyway. Affordable housing should not put additional burdens on any Village resident. Examples could be where Green- port's allocated electricity is bought at a certain rate, and should they have to now, with this extra amount of people, pay more, that means the people in Greenport Village would be paying the extra burden. And lastly, we have two acre zoning proclaimed throughout this Town of ours and should this proposed project go through, it should not go through unless all the above problems that I've mentioned have been mitigated. Now, some people might thing they have. I do not think they have. I will not vote against this, but I will not support it. I will abstain. I just want it on the record that I think people should be looking into the environmental problems that we're creating for our future residents in this Town, and I realize the importance of this so-called project with the need for housing in' this 'Town, but I do think it should have been in a better location where there was a much better supply of water. That's all I have. Thank you. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Thank you. Anyone else want to make a comment? (No response.) 46.-Vote of the Town Board : Ayes: Councilman Penny, Councilwoman Cochran, Council- man Schondebare, Justice Edwards, Supervisor Murphy. Abstain; Councilman Stoutenburgh. This resolution was declared duly ADOPTED. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Number 47 is to amend agreements with Special Attorneys for the Town of Southold. 47. Moved by Councilwoman Cochran, seconded by Justice Edwards, it 'was RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby amends their agreements with Special Attorneys for the Town of Southold as follows: 1. Increase the compensation of Richard F. Lark to $125. 00 per hour. 2. Insert a new provision in the agreements of Richard F. Lark and Francis ' J. Yakaboski whereby they agree that during the term of the agreement they will not represent any clients before any agencies or boards of the Town of Southold. 47.-Vote of the Town Board: Ayes: Councilman Penny, Councilwoman Cochran, Council man Schondebare, Justice Edwards, Supervisor Murphy. No: Councilman Stoutenburgh. This resolution was declared duly ADOPTED. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Okay, that's the end of our prepared and added-on-to agenda. At this time does any Board member have any other comments? Ray? (Nothing, thank you.) Jean? , (Thank you, no.) Paul? (Thank you, no.) Jay? COUNCILMAN SCHONDEBARE: Just on the Costello project. We'd like to be kept abreast of what's going on with the proiect when you no baforP tha Planninn Rnarrl J in case tnere,s any delay we'd like to hear about it. We certainly hope that it moves quickly and we certainly don't want it be said that the Town was guilty of delay or dilatory actions. So if you have any problems please feel free to pick up the phone and call me. You won't get me, but I'll get back to you. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: George? (Not at this time. Thank you. ) Okay, anyone in the audience like to address the Town Board? Over here on the left? Anyone? Middle? On the_ right? (No response.) If not, I think a motion is in order to adjourn, and I would like to thank everybody for coming out tonight. Moved by Councilwoman Cochran, seconded by Councilman Schondebare, it was RESOLVED that this Town Board meeting be and hereby is adjourned at 8: 35 P.M. Vote of the Town Board : Ayes : Councilman Penny, Councilwoman Cochran, Council- man Schondebare, Councilman Stoutenburgh, Justice Edwards, Supervisor Murphy. This resolution was declared duly ADOPTED. 0 s...�j..e� Irlith T Tarry L FEBRUARY 24, 1987 49 LOCAL LAW NO. - 1987 A Local Law in relation to Bed and Breakfast facilities BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Southold, as follows: I. Section 100-30B, Subsection (16) (Bed and Breakfast Facilities) is hereby amende by adding a new paragraph (b) thereto, to read as follows: (b) No accessory apartment, as authorized by Section 100-306(15) hereof, shall be permitted in or on premises for which a bed and breakfast facility is authorized or exists. II. This Local Law shall take effect upon its filing with the Secretary of State. 43.-Vote of the Town Board : Ayes : Councilman Penny, Councilwoman Cochran, Council- man Schondebare, Councilman Stoutenburgh, Justice Edwards, Supervisor Murphy. This resolution was declared duly ADOPTED. _ SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Number 44 is to authorize a street light installation. 44. Moved by Councilman Penny, seconded by Justice Edwards, it was RESOLVED that.the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes the installation of a street liqht on Youngs Avenue, Southold, at the entrance to Founders Village 44.-Vote of the Town Board : Ayes : Councilman Penny, Councilwoman Cochran, Council man Schondebare, Councilman Stoutenburgh, Justice Edwards, Supervisor Murphy. This resolution was declared duly ADOPTED. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Number 45 is to authorize the execution of a grant application. 45. Moved by Councilman Schondebare, seconded by Councilman Penny, it was RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes and directs Supervisor Francis J. Murphy to execute a The North Fork Earl Learning grant application with respect !ng by HUD :1nd the center obtaining non-prof ttstatublect to approval of the fund- s. 45.-Vete of the Town Board: Ayes: Councilman Penny, Councilwoman Cochran, Council man Schondebare, Justice Edwards, Supervisor Murphy. Abstain': Councilman Stoutenburgh. This resolution was declared duly ADOPTED. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Number 46 is 'a resolution that quite a few people have been waiting for for quite a long time. 46. Moved by Councilwoman Cochran, seconded by Councilman Penny, WHEREAS, John A. Costello, by petition dated November 24, '1986, petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold for a change of zone on certain' property situated at' Greenport, Town of Southold, New York, from "M" Light Multiple Residence District to "AHD" Affordable Housin' District, and WHEREAS, the said petition was referred to the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk County Planning Commission for official recommendation and report, and WHEREAS, the Town Board, pursuant to due notice, held a public hearing thereon on the 20th day of January, 1987, at 8:00 P.M. , at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that John A. Costello be nand' he herebyis GRANTED the relief demanded n'said petition, fora change of zone from ""M" Light Multiple Residence District to "AHD" Affordable Housing District on the -following described lands situated at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, and being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Moore's Lane, said point being South 17 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 1208. 03 feet from the intersection of the easterly side of Moore's Lane with the southerly side of North Road (C.R. #48) and running thence the following three (3) courses and distances along lands now or formerly of Costello: (1) North 74 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 635. 03 feet; (2) North 58 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 132. 97 feet, (3) North 16 degrees 01 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 1254.09 feet to the southerly side of North Road (C.R. #48) running thence the following two (2) courses and distances alonq the southerly side of North 0 I(udd CC-R- #46) : 01 North b9 degrees 00 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 288. feet, (2) North 71 degrees 28 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 312. 65 feet to a subdivision map entitled "Map of Fleetfield" as filed in the office of the Suffolk County Clerk on February 6, 1942 as map no. 1351 , running thence South 16 degrees 01 minutes 50 seconds East along said westerly map line and lane of others a distance of 1451. 06 feet to lands now or formerly the Incorporated Village of Greenport, running thence the following two (2) courses and distances along lands now or formerly the Incorporated Village of Greenport: (1) South 58 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 713. 30 feet, (2) South 74 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 669. 70 feet to the easterly side of Moore's Lane, running thence North 17 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds West along the easterly side of Moore's Lane a distance of 315.19 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing within said bounds an area of 1, 152,271 sq. ft. or 26. 4525 acres. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Any comments? COUNCILMAN PENNY: Yes, I'd like to make one, as far as divulginb relationships. 1 have a very casual businecc "Qur . �ti: g usiness PLAN ITED TOWN O 3QU UOLD SUFF©�K [JN Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 13 , 1988 Merle Wiggins one Bootleg Ally Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Ceder Fields SCTM $1000-40-5-1 Dear Mr. Wiggins: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 11, 1988 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board ask David Emilita, Planning Consultant, to review the supplement to DEIS dated June 25, 1988 for this major subdivision. This parcel is located at Moores Lane, Greenport. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, OROWSKI JR. CHAIRMAN jt cc: Dave Emilita 5�FF0(/( P ti D T D SL Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 8, 1987 389 0 Mr. Donald Bracken 33 Gaul Road S. Setauket, NY 11733 RE: Cedarfields/Mooresland AT Greenport; SCTM #1000-40,5-1 Dear Mr. Bracken: In order to,)proceed on the above mentioned-proposal, with regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, would you please request or grant a 60-day extension for the Planning Board in which to prepare the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) . If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office, or the office of David Emilita, Planning Consultant. (Tele. # 401-423-0430) Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, , JR. ,CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING- BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary • PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANTS One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 Telephone: (5 16) 477-0030 RECEIVED BY SOUTUOLD ]OWN PLANNING BOARD August 31 , 1987 SEP 2 1987 DATE V ASSOCIATES: Fairweather/Brown Architects Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman Gannet Fleming Southold Town Planning Board Engineers Southold Town Hall R.P. Morrow &Associates Main Road Winery Design Southold , L . I . Planners East New York - 11971 FnvironmenralPlanning Re : Letter of August 25 , 1987 Wilhelm Atlantic Co. Cedarfields Preliminary Financial Planning Subdivision (40-5- 1 ) Dear Mr. Orlowski : So that we may correctly respond to the items in the Resolution of August 24, 1987 , could you help us out on the following : 1 . The response to the D. E. I . S. regarding potable water. Who can advise what is required in regard to this item? 2 . As you know from our letter of August 20 , 1987 , we met with engineers of Sidney Bowne and made proposals to remove the swales , put in curbs , and use leaching basins to handle the storm water . Can someone tell us if this method will be acceptable , especially seeing that we have already initiated a fairly expensive soil testing program to establish drainage coefficients in accordance with the New York D. O. T. specifications . Respectfully submitted , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E. Wiggin , Ph . D. , M. E. President cc : Mrs . Nancy Harrington Diane Carroll Donald Bracken Sidney Bowne Associates mcA &tf � -0roclc c n at hco A�� S��Fc�c Ta D i Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 2, 1987 Mr. Donald Bracken 33 Gaul Lane S. Strongs Neck Setauket, NY 11733 RE: Cedarfields/Mooresland Dear Mr. Bracken: As per our conversation on this date, enclosed is a report from Cornell which David Emilita feels will help with the question of the well in the DEIS for the .above mentioned project. We hope this information is helpful to you. Very truly yours, Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board enc. Land Use and Ground-Water Quality in the Pine Barrens of Southampton I '� 1. �+ �.��� °�'+S}. �11"'ak+ifi 9�e ^cd � A. •a�e t<�� orc F^^ Ns i S Water Resources Program Center for Environmental Research Cornell University Cedarfields The final application shall include the following: 1. Elevation drawings and floor plans for all proposed structures. 2. Water and sewer easements in the open space area on the west side of Lots 26 and 27, and in the recreation area on the north side of Lots 50 in the Cedarfiels section of the proposal. 3. Approval of the well from all applicable agencies, e.g. NYSDEC and SCDHS, or a copy of the application to same. 4. Provisions for the maintenance of the two open space parcels adjacent to Lots 26 and 27 shall be explained. 5. JOHN A. COSTELLO 206 Wiggins Lane Greenport, New York 11944 RECEIVED BY June 17, 1988 _ PA75 Southold Town Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Zone Change Extension Moores Lane, Greenport Dear Board Members: Please be advised that the approval of the Town Board, dated February 24, 1987, for a change of zone from "M" Light Multiple Residence District to "AHD" Affordable Housing District is due to expire in the near future. My efforts to obtain approval from the Village of Greenport for Water and Sewer connections has resulted in numerous meetings and unanticipated delays. Due to these facts, we have not been able to commence activity on this project as early as we had anticipated. I am optimistic that necessary approvals will be forthcoming in the near future, and I respectfully request a six (6) month extension under Section 100-55.6 of the Code of the Town of Southold. Thank you for your assistance and attention in this matter. Very truly yours, John A. Costello cc: Southold Town Clerk Southold Town Planning Board✓ t' A�,JTY OF SUFFOLK h0.9tis� rYl RECEIVED BY SGU RD IN PLANNING BDAND " r AUG Z7 1987 DA It Michael A. L ,-rande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER August 24 , 1987 Mr . Bennett Orlowski Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold , New York 11971 RE : The Cedarfields Affordable Housing Project and the Mooresland Town Houses Project DEIS Dear Mr . Orlowski : The Suffolk County Department of Health Services ( SCDHS ) has reviewed the above-referenced Draft Environmental Impact Statement ( DEIS ) and submits the following comments regarding sanitary code compliance and natural resources concerns . I . Sanitary Code The SCDHS has received an application for realty subdivision for this project and is awaiting further information from the applicant . This project will meet density requirements for Article VI of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code if municipal water and sewer services are provided , as is proposed in the DEIS . The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the approval of plans for public water and public sewer installation . Therefore , the applicant should not undertake the installation of any such systems without Health Department approval . An application for water supply distribution system approval was submitted to the Bureau of Drinking Water and has been reviewed . The Bureau subsequently notified the applicant of its concerns by letter dated August 5 , 1987 . A copy of this letter is attached for the Town ' s information . II . Natural Resources A . Our staff conducted a field inspection of the project site on August 22 , 1987 and found the area to contain important old field and pioneer forest habitat for wildlife . The patchiness COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD.N.Y. 11901 Letter to Bennett Orlowski August 24 , 1987 Page 2 ( dispersion and juxtaposition of herbaceous shrub and tree growth ) of the habitat on the site results in the provision of significant edge situations capable of supporting a high diversity of wildlife species . The Terrestrial Ecology section of the DEIS is deficient in its coverage of the flora and fauna that occur on the site . Further- more , there is no mention of the loss of valuable wildlife habitat under Section V - Significant Environmental Impacts . We believe that the project , as planned , will result in the permanent displacement of certain typical old field and pioneer forest wildlife species from the site . A thorough evaluation of the wildlife resource on the site must be completed . The potential negative effects of the project on that resource and appropriate mitigation measures should be discussed before further action is taken . The cumulative impacts on wildlife as a result of this project should be clearly outlined in this discussion . B . Although the planned buffer zones will be capable of supporting typical suburban wildlife species , these areas will be incapable of maintaining many of the old field species which now inhabit the site . A revised site plan that displays an increase in the number and width of buffer zones may aid in the partial mitiga- tion of this negative environmental impact . We recommend a minimum 75-foot width for planned buffer zones along North Road , Moores Lane , and between the townhouse and affordable housing sections . In addition , we recommend the preservation of 25-foot natural buffer zones between the affordable housing units , and adjacent Village of Greenport Trailer Park and private homes along Middletown Road . The buffer zones should be planned in contiguous tracts , oaiierever possible , to preserve wildlife travel corrid--rs arc, ndbitat quality in general . The existing vegetation should be preserved to the greatest extent practicable . Wherever additional plantings are needed , native species should be utilized . C . The nature of the water-saving devices planned for the residen- tial units should be described in better detail . III . Alternatives We find that the presentation of alternative actions is not sufficient for comparative assessment . The DEIS , therefore , is incomplete with respect to its content . The DEIS offers no alternative site plans or subdivision designs . Rather , the document provides a subjective discussion of Letter to Bennett Orlowski August 24 , 1987 Page 3 alternatives which serves solely to promote the applicant ' s desired plan . Alternatives should be presented objectively and in detail sufficient for determining the most environmentally sensitive plan for the subject proposal . Alternatives that achieve the goals of the applicant and provide for greater environmental protection than the present plan should be prepared and be suitable for objective comparative assessment . We appreciate the opportunity to review this DEIS . Should you have any questions or concerns , please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at your convenience . Sincerely , Louise W. Harrison Supervisor , Bureau of Environmental Management Office of Ecology LWH/amf CC : Vito Minei , P . E . Steve Costa , P . E . attachment CATY OF SUFFOLK MICHAEL A. &OOGRANDE COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS.M.D..M.P.H. August 5 , 1987 COMMISSIONER Mr. Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates , Inc. One Bootleg Alley P.O. Boz 672 Greenport , New York 11944 Re: Cedarfields and Mooresland Water Distribution System Dear Mr. Wiggin: The following comments for the referenced project submission dated July 14, 1987 and received by our office on July 27, 1987 are offered for your consideration: The Village of _Greenport Water Supply Master plan dated February 1986 indicates the potential for installation of a new wellfield in the vicinity of the proposed project. Subdivision map SP-1 notes a parcel designated as a "well site." If it is the intent to use this parcel for a water supply well , clarification should be provided to our office along with a copy of a contractual agreement made with the Village. A New York State Department of Environmental 4 Conservation Water Supply Applicatian and detailed site plans must be submitted and approved for the wellfield. A copy of the contractual agreements with the Greenport o Water Supply regarding ownership of the water mains should also be provided our office. Plans and specification reference complying with certain Greenport Water Supply standards . The details of the Greenport requirements should be incorporated directl:7 into the contract specifications . Plot plan indicates several water and sewage main cr - These crossings should be indicated on the prof ; '. :, .- assure that adequate separation distances are main[_ : .: 226 RASRC JP':E EA- - -Rr . Merlon Wiggin , , 1987 P;:conic ASsociates , Inc . A"� Thrust block details should be included on � I�e Plans . The 48-inch depth of main cover indicated on page 0271-5 of the specifications does not conform with the drawing detail of 54 inches . A water main interconnection at Barnett Road should be provided as part of the contract , not at some future date . From a hydraulic viewpoint , it is desirable to loop the system whenever feasible . Please review the width of permanent easements , par- ticularly where sewer and water mains are placed in the same easement . It appears the width provided may be inadequate to accommodate a separation distance of 10 feet between sewer and water lines and still have adequate access should repairs be necessary in the future. All fittings shall meet AWWA specifications . Drawing OD-5 indicates the use of PVC tees . I am unaware of any AWWA approvals for plastic tee fittings . Should you have any questions , please feel free to give me a call. Very truly yours , Dennis Horan, P.9- Principal Public Health Engineer Bureau of Drinking Water DM/jdm cc: G. Gebert J. Monsell (Greenport W. S. ) Ct1VED BY 40 SDUW TOWN PLANNING BOARD PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. AUG 24198r" DATE ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANTS One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport, New York 11944 Telephone: (5 16) 477.0030 August 21 , 1987 ASSOCIATES: Fairweather/Brown Architects Gannet Fleming Mr. Bennett Orlowski ,, Jr. - Chairman R.P.Morrow&Associates Southold Town Planning Board Winery Design Southold Town Hall Main Road Planners East Southold , L . I . Environmental Planning New York - 11971 Wilhelm Atlantic Co. Financial Planning Re : Site Drainage - Cedarfields/Mooresland . Dear Mr. Orlowski : On August 19th , 1987 , Nancy Harrington and the writer met with Bob Brown and John Cahn of Sidney Bowne in Smithtown , to discuss a different site drainage system for Cedarfields/Mooresland . We were advised that despite the previous understandingof in swal using es that a member of the Planning Board had recommended that they be eliminated and go to a more conventional drainage system , namely , storm drains and drainage system to convey storm water off the site . Consequently , the swales are to be removed and curbs installed . The initial proposal was to pipe the storm water from Cedarfields to Moores Drain (outlet of Silver Lake ) or out to Moores Lane and South on Moores Lane to the point that the Moores Drain crosses Moores Lane . Discussion on this method of site drainage included the physical impossibility to place the cross street drains above the sanitary lines becausef o the minimum slope and invert elevations necessary to gain entry into the Village of Greenport ' s pumping station , and , if the drain was placed beneath the sanitary line , it would be very difficult to get a clear outflow without being in ground water . Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. August 21 , 1987 Page 2 Added to this was the expressed concerns about getting Village of Greenport easement approval and D. E. C . wetlands approval prior to early next year. As an alternative , we suggested the New York State D. O. T. design formulas for leaching basins be used as follows : k XS( 'n/ _ Mkt Alyt �„ ✓� with Kt the transmission zone hydraulic conductivity and Qt providing the cumulative flow out of the leaching basin at any time . In these formulas , the Ks ( Saturated Soil Permeability ) is the most important factor to be determined based on permeability coefficient ranges . From soils data from Riverhead Sub-Strata this is expected to range from 10-' to 10'' , with an average of 10-2 . Because of the concern in regard to the actual capability of the basins , it was recommended that the soils be actually tested to determine its permeability coefficient . Eighteen ( 18) tests are planned and it should take approximately two ( 2 ) to three ( 3 ) weeks to get the test results , after which the calculations can be completed and the exact number of leaching basins can be determined . The previously submitted drainage calculations are to be voided and new ones based on the above to be provided in approximately four (4 ) to five ( 5 ) weeks . An example of determining leaching and storage capability as used in the above method is attached . You will note that there is a safety factor of 1 .4 and in addition we only propose to use a four (4 ) foot head , which is half of the depth of the proposed leaching basin . Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. August 21 , 1987 Page 3 The proposed run-off calculation is based on 2 . 5 inches per hour , or a twenty-five (25 ) year storm. It was suggested , that if possible , that we should increase the drainage system capability to handle 3 1 /2 inches in one ( 1 ) hour to provide some additional safety factors , which would approximate to a one hundred ( 100 ) year storm. Respectfully submitted , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E. Wiggin , Ph . D. , M. E. President cc : Mrs . Nancy Harrington Diane Carroll Donald Bracken Sidney Bowne Associates C 'Jn'i • _ WiENN• 1f!-. w!C■■■■■■■■■■ alumna � - . < • . - : �I��!!�■■1■■.■■■./e/ms�.■■.■ ■.■■■■■■.HiIMIM0 -MR .12rom Z" No .. ■M■■ en�9■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■.■■ ■.■■■■.■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■.■■■■■■■. c cam:m n — .■ . .■..■...■.■.■...■■■■. ■.i��r�MOONS.■.■..MEN ■ ■ NO . !■■N .■■■ .■ �, ...■.■■■■■....■■■ MIN ■.■■mom■■■■■...■...■ .d■!!.�l�!!L! J�!■..■■■■■ .■ENE..ONE■.■.MEN ■ ,� Im' p■■■■■■■■■■.!1 ■ i■Noo.RI1■■ON■O■■ ■ no N■■■■■.■■■■ ■ .MN■■.■■■.■■■.■■■■■■ .mom.■■■■■NOON■■■■■■ ■ . . :WEIAMUW ■®mommmPro gym V�!!!mommmoil4.►.■■MOWN NNIOL"mmomm. ■ ■■.......■..a.■■■■■ ■ .■■...■■.....■..■s■■■ ■!■■r,I . ,■'■■■■"■■o■■ �■■■■■■■■■®■■®NONE ommommom is MEMEMMOMMO. ■.■.■■pp■■..■■� � = ■�, ■■■■■..■.■■■..■■..■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■= ! ! SIDNEY Be BOWNE & SON Sidney B.Bowne,P.E.,L.S. Roland Antlers (1922-1959) Roger L Cocchi Francis J.Lynch Chester c Kelsey. P.E.,L.S. 45 Manor Road Philip Schlotzhauer Alexandre W.Mercil, P.E. Robert A.Stanton,P.E. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 Joseph F.St e9men Paul F.Stevens Robert W. Brown, L.S. (516) 724-0611 William T.St Zabdiel A. Blackman,P.E., L.S. Syme Richard B.Weber George A.Style,P.E. Jerry D.Almont,P.E. George L.Fagan,Jr.,Ph.D.,P.E. Frank Capobianco,C.E. Thomas R.Pynchon,L.S. August 10, 1987 Mr. Bennet Orlowski , Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Review of the Cedarfields Affordable Housing Project and the Mooresland Town Houses Project. (SBB NO. 87148) Dear Sir: We have begun our review of the above referenced projects. A summary of our comments and recommendations is as follows: 1. Mr R. G. Ward of the Town's Planning Board had commented that the sketch plan approval was subject to a 100 ft. buffer on Moores Lane. It should be noted that by increasing the buffer from 50 feet to 100 feet will probably necessitate the relocation of several buildings in order to maintain the minimum separation between them, or possibly a reduction in the number of units. 2. The 18 feet pavement width for the Mooresland Townhouses is too narrow and should be increased to 24 feet, thus providing greater separation between vehicles passing in opposite directions. It will also provide a wider area for maintenance and emergency vehicles. 3. A positive drainage system with a recharge basin in lieu of leach- ing pools should be provided. Refer to Section 108-26 of the Town Code. 4. The overall road layout and grading plan in general is acceptable. However, we are concerned as to the tight turning radius of the bends (75 feet centerline) in the roads, at places other than intersections. MINEOLA o SMITHTOWN a NEW YORK CITY a CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M/FM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 10, 1987 Page Two 5. The existing topographic features of Middle Road and Moore's Lane which border the site are not shown at all as required in the code. 6. The scale at which the profiles were drawn are incorrect. Also, street names, type of pipe, slope of pipe, and a more precise drawing title should be submitted at the time of final submission. Please advise us as to the status of this project after the upcoming public hearing. Also, we would appreciate the Town's comments to Items 1 - 4 of this review. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS HN W. KUHN/ JWK:clg ---1 sw4n proud L- . s sc"L C4 �o lop b np^ _ a w� + ai N NCONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANTS One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 Telephone: (5 16) 477-0030 SoUii ' i , CaJ Liln ASSOCIATES: August 7 , 1987 DATE Fairweather/Brown Architects Gannet Flerning Lngineers Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman R.P.Morrow&Associates Southold Town Planning Board Winery Design Southold Town Hall Planners East Main Road l:in-ironmental Planning Southold , L . I . wilhohnAtlantic Co. New York - 11971 Financial Planning Re : Cedarfields-Mooresland Dear Mr. Orlowski : _ Reference is made to several comments from Dave Emilita and Dick Ward in regard to plans and D . E. I . S. for subject project . Responses are as follows : 1 . Zone of Influence of Proposed Well . For those not familiar with the site , attached MCII is a copied portion of the County Topographic _ I n Map show the area of influence of the proposed well . You will note that to the East is Fleetfield , which is already developed ; to the Southeast is Silver Lake and wetlands area which is not subject to development ; to the South is additional wetlands , trailer court , and Greenport School athletic area , which is not scheduled for development ; to the West is almost exclusively Village of Greenport designated recharge and Natural Area , which has already been designated to be preserved ; to the North is the majority of the proposed development plus the Southern portion of the McCann Estate which has already been developed . 40 Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. August 7 , 1987 Page 2 2 . Buffer Area Between Moores Lane and Proposed Development . The Planning Board approved sketch plan submittal for the buffer area was fifty (50 ) feet , not one hundred ( 100 ) feet . 3 . Drainage Swales . Drainage swales were selected for this project in lieu of curbs and a collection type storm drainage system as being a better environmental approach because of the well drained soils in this particular area . As this is an Affordable Housing Project it was also an economic consideration . The plan to use drainage swales was made known in a letter to the Planning Board on March 26 , 1987 and subsequent discussion has been , I understand , that the Town would prefer drainage swales . The drainage system , therefore , was designed accordingly . ( See attached Preliminary Plan dated 4/23/87. ) Drainage Swale calculations were also accepted in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and its Supplement . 4 . Sidewalks . The requirement for sidewalks has never been made during any of the discussions and planning reviews . It is our understanding that the Town Highway Department prefer not to install sidewalks . Also , sidewalks are not compatible with the drainage Swale design concept. Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC . erlon E . Wigg ' Ph . D. , M. E. President Enclosures cc : Diane Carroll Donald Bracken File PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANTS One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 Telephone: (S 16) 477-0030 March 26, 1987 - ASSOCIATES: Fairweather/Bruwn Architects Gannet Fleming Southold Town Planning Board Engineers Southold Town Hall R.P.Morrow&Associates Main Road Winery Design Southold , L . I . Planners East New York — 11971 Environmental Planning Wilhelm Atlantic Co. Re: Cedarfields Affordable Financial Planning Housing Project . Gentlemen : During the sketch plan review scheduled for subject project on March 30th, request these additional items be discussed so as to expedite the project : 1 . Width of streets and roads . 2 . Storm drainage to include consideration of drainage swales versus curbs. Sincerely, PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E. Wiggin, Ph.D. ,M. E. President MEW/iw r~ � r m o v .• � z � 0 r n = 3 EzTENl� �✓E/J7ENT T..�u6.4 � 'o z SuJiOGE r-�_ Q?h/E[Jh1Y .Ov.Z�NS. .,� m m • o = D EASEMENT LINE EASEMENT LINE 3 o R.OW. LINE R.O.W. LINE z O V io D lz� O \ _ < 12'-0' 25..0.. 25'-0" 12''O" O n ! 6'•p, _ 6' 0' S'0., 0« / _O° 5'0" 6'-0" 6.-0« ,D •� bl 1,344! 6« 4..CROWN(TYP) ND /Ak O2 0 C CONC.HEADERCURB 8 See OWG.NO.SDB51 6 O 4" TPSOILED 4"TOPSOILED D r. flOSEEDED 8 SEEDED L v 0 I1 2" WEARING COURSE . o N 2 1/2"BINDER COURSE C it FINE GRADE D 0 4"COMPACTED BASE COURSE C 3/4" STONE BLEND OR CRUSHED CONCRETE N a Z . TYPICAL SECTION WITH GRASSED SWALE m P D 7' LD S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 29, 1987 Merlon Wiggin, President Peconic Associates 1 Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Cedarfields-Moorelands DEIS Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has scheduled the above referenced proposal for two hearings on August 10th. Enclosed is a copy of the Planning Consultant's review of the draft environmental impact statement. Note that there are still some unanswered questions particulary those which are noted in the second paragraph. It would be most helpful if you could provide this information prior to the August 10th hearing. At the least, be prepared to answer these questions in detail at the hearing. Very truly yours, nn BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD m SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS July 8, 1987 - Mr. Bennett Orlowski Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Cedarfields-Moorelands DEIS Dear Bennett, We have reviewed the Supplement to the DEIS dated June 25, 1987 and find that together with the DEIS itself, the DEIS plus supplement are complete and adequate for review and public comment. We continue to have reservations about the sufficiency of analysis with regard to the long term viability of the proposed well. Specifically, it is implied that only. the proposed project will have any recharge impact within the zone of influence of the proposed well. This project does not exist in isolation within the zone of influence. There are (presumebly) other existing land uses and surely additional development will take place within the well' s radius. The DEIS does not address these uses. The well will also need DEC approval as well as SCDHS approval. We call this to your attention as a coordinated review with these two agencies will be extremely important on this issue. The assessment of traffic and drainage impacts will be addressed during the comment period. We are available for consultation on the above points. Sincerely, EPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES„7NC. RECEIVED BY SgIIIDID WA POKIM ORD David J.S. Emilia, AICP 1 O �npJO� Principal P1 er JUL 1 DJSE/kb i F oil( T LD S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 8, 1987 Mr. Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Cedarfields Subdivision at Greenport Dear Mr. Wiggin: Enclosed is a copy of correspondence received from the Highway Committee with regard to your request on the road improvements on the above mentioned affordable housing project. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, 30IYVJ , dl�A1,�1��µ,�ro�n g BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. i Ln COUNCILMEN TELEPHONE Raymond W. Edwardsa� (516)765-1891 Paul Stoutenburgh James A. Schondebare COUNCILMEN Jean W. Cochran TOWN OF SOUTHOLD George L. Penny IV Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 April '6, 1987_ To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Southold Town Board Highway Committee Re: Highway Specifications - Costello AHD Project In response to your recent letter concerning reduction of the highway specifications for the Costello AHD Project, please be advised that the Highway Committee recommends that said' roads be built' to current High- way Specifications. Ln • Town Hall, 53095 Main Road t- P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ,JUDITH T. TERRY TELEPHONE TOWN CLERK (516)765-1601 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 30, 1987 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is refund check in the amount of $3, 650. 00, payable to Donald E VictoriaBracken, which amount represents a double payment with respect to Site Plan #161 (Cedarfields E Mooresland) submitted to the Planning Board. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Attachment M Officers UTILITY OFFICE TEL. 4� (516)477-1748 MAYOR 1illaye ofreea�vort GEORGE W.HUBBARD ix coxroR.rso ua POWER PLANT TEL. NEW�xcowroRRnow APRIL r.'RAR (516)477.0172 TRUSTEES Ra,xeoRPoRATiox Yx0[R 6[x{0RL uw Mur :x. u.. 1EANNE M.COOPER f'O" GAIL F.HORTON DAVID E.KAPELL Y WILLIAM H.LIEBLEIN ..- rO:NG � 1 SLANG - SUFf.OF U171IfIn JAMES 1.MONSELL 236 THIRD ��• HIRDRD STREET GREENPORT,SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK 11944 September 25, 1986 Mr. John Costello Wiggins Lane . Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - Moore's Lane, Greenport Dear Mr. Costello, On May 28, 1986 the Utility Committee recommended that the Village of Greenport enter into a sewer and water agreement with you, so that you can proceed with your plans before the Town of Southold. On June 18, 1986 the Village Board of Trustees author- ized the Village Attorney to prepare the water and sewer agree- ments. These agreements are being prepared. If I can be of further service, please contact me. Very truly yours, James I. Monsell Superintendent of Public Utilities JIM:Ikm CC: George Hubbard, Mayor All Village Trustees Utility Committee Village Attorney Sam McLendon, H2M Southold Town Board Southold Planning Board �N a1a51� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ss: STATE OF NEW YORK STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW (SEQR) NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL , Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, IMP4CT STAT ENT AND SUPPL NT AND a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; pI0 CE:OF and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, SEQRA HEARING has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman TAX MAP NO: once each week for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .l. . . . . . . weeks 1000-40-5-p/o 1 LEAD AGENCY: Town of >P Southold successively, commencing on the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Planning Bbard , Town Hall da of . . . . . `_ . . . . .. 19 �. 7 . South-Will. NY 11971 DATE to This 617 and Chapterr44aof . . \. . : . . . - _-. 1... �- Y the Southold Town Code of the implementing regulations per- taining to Article 8 (State En- vironmental Quality Review / Act)ofthdtrivirclamentalCon- Sworn to before me this . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . . . . . . . . day of servation Law. i A._Draft 4vironmental Im- �,. , 7 pact-Statem . .eht has been com- . . . . . . �:- . . . . . 1 9 . .... . . pleted and accepted for the pro- 7 posed action described below. Comments on the Draft EIS.are requested and will be accepted by the ntact person until mg on theoDraftElSwill beheld Notary ublic /. e9 P . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 27,1987.A public hear- onAu8mR10,1987at7:30p.m. GA" ?ARA FORGES at the Southold Town Hall, roc, State of 2;ew Yoxlt Main Road, Southold. 0 NAME OF ACTION: County Cedarfields ... � Lxllies.4t 3/ 19 FF Mooresland DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: eedarfields is a,realty sub- division of 84 lots on 26.4 acres in ,the affordable housing district in conjunction with M or which is an 84 unit i town ouse.Proposal on 22.2 "ECEiVrl BY acres in an M-1 zone. ll !,o,p: rt LOCATION: S ��L J iU¢( ILiNkliNG NAB County Route"48,and Moore's A U Lt Ll ,j 198 7 Lane, Greenport,. Town of ----- ---- ----- Southold, County of Suffolk. A COPY OF THE DRAFT EIS MAX BE OBTAINED FROM: Town of Southold Planning Board Office, Town Hall, Southold,NY 11971,765-1938. IT-7/30/87(66) LE NOTICE STATE El.✓IRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW(SEQR) NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF STATE OF NEW YORK ) DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTSTATEMENT ) SS: AND SUPPLEMENT COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) AND NOTICE OF SEQRA HEAR- ING Gerry Paglie,ro of Greenport, in TAX MAP NO:1000-40-5-p/ol — --------- LEAD AGENCY: Town of said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Southold Planning Board,Town Hall,Southold,N.Y.11971 Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly DATE:July 27,1987 Newspaper, published at Greenport, in the Town This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 and Chapter 44 of of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New the Southold Town Code of the York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is implementing regulations per- taining to Article 8 (State En- a printed copy, has been regularly published it vironmental Quality Review l Act) of the Environmental Con- said Newspaper once each week for servation Law. weeks succe A Draft Environmental Im- ssively, commencing on the pact Statement has been com- dayof�Tiihr____. 1987 pleted and accepted for the prop- osed action described below. Comments on the Draft EIS are requested and will be accepted f2l�erk by the contact person until Au- Lu gust 27, 1987. A public hearing nc on the Draft EIS will be held on August 10, 1987 at 7:30P.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Sworn to b re m this. Road,Southold. NAME OF ACTION: day of _ 19 l Cedarfields MARY K.OEGNAN Mooresland o ��� NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: � J `" _/ �� Suffolk County N0.4849860 CEDARFIELDS is a realty / / Term Expires February,Y19�� subdivision of 84 lots on 26.4 acres in the affordable housing district in conjunction with MOORESLAND which is an 84-unit town house proposal on 22.2 acres in an M-1 zone. LOCATION: County Route 48, and Moore's Lane,Greenport,Town of South- old,County of Suffolk. A COPY OF THE DRAFT EIS MAYBE OBTAINED FROM: Town of Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall Southold,NY 11971 765-1938 c 1TJy30-5676 Legal Notice NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of STATE OF NEW YORK 1 Town Law,public hearings will be held by the Southold Town 1 SS: Planning Board, at the Town COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 1 Hall,Main Road,Southold,New York in said Town on the 10th day of August on the question of Ge 1"r 7r P ag l l ar 0 the following: —.__-__ — of Greenport, in 7:30 P.M. Public hearing on said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she is the question of approval of the preliminary maps for the major Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly subdivision to be known as Newspaper, published at Greenport, in the Town "Cedarfields" located at Green- port, in the Town of Southold, of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New County of Suffolk and State of York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is New York and bounded and de- scribed m follows: a printed copy, has been regularly published in BEGINNING at the comer said Newspaper once each week for l formed by the intersection of the southerly side of North Road, weeks successively, commencing on the also known m Middle Road or County Route 48,with the wes- day of .T_ til T19_17 terly side of the property of Ar- thur Nichols and land now or formerly of Henry Fleet and a Clarence Fleet,now or formerly ) known as Fleetfield; running thence South 16 degrees,01'50" flfciDvi�YlClerk East along said direction for a distance of 1451.06 feet;running thence South 58 degrees,15'00" Sworn to fore e this West along northern boundary day of MUU� 1 �. , of the village of Greenport, 713.30 feet; running thence /� South 74 degrees, 45' 00" Weet 7r/�/ij�> D� NOTARY PUBLIC,State oI N61r YMFt N along land of the Village of X- (.i. eco/J 7� �CA Suffolk County No.4849860 a pbF D Term Expires Februagw l er Greenport to monument at in- tersection of property of the Vil- lage of Greenport and Moore's Lane; running thence North 17 degrees,15'00"West to a monu- ment separating the new Afford- able Housing District and "M" zone for 653.03 feet; thence North 58 degrees, 15' 00" East along said boundary between the Affordable Housing District and "M" zone for 132.97 feet; thence North 16 degrees 01'50" West along said boundary be- tween the Affordable Housing y District and "M" zone for 1,254.09 feet to the South side of North Road or County Route 48; thence running North 69 de grass,00'20" East along south- em boundary of County Route 48;thence North 71 degrees,28' 20"East along southern bound- ary of County Route 48, 312.65 feet to a point or place of BE- GINNING. Containing 26.4 acres. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place above specified. DATED:July 27,1987 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLAN- NING BOARD BENNETT ORLOWSKI CHAIRMAN 1TJy30-5677 Legal Notice NOTICE OF HEARIN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK EN that pursuant to Section 276 STATE OF NEW YORK ss. of Town Law, public hearings will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board at the Town Hall, Main Road, Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Southold, New York, in said Town on the l0thday ofAugust Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, on the question of the following: a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; 7:30 p.m. Public hearing on and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, the question of approval of the preliminary maps for the major has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman subdivision to be known as once each week for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . weeks "Cedarfields"located at Green- port, in the Town of Southold, "> � County of Suffolk and State of successively, commencing on the . . . . . . . ?.`. . . . . . . . . . . New York and bounded and described as follows: �-'- BEGINNING at the corner day o j formed by the intersection of the - - Southerly side of North Road, ��, C------ .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�- }-. CJ also known as Middle Road or -� County Route 48, with the Westerly side of the property of Arthur Nichols and land now or formerly of Henry Fleet and Sworn to before me this . . . . . . . . . . �. . . . . . . . . day of Clarence Fleet, now or former- ly known as Fleetfield; running ' thence South 16° 01' 50" East . . . . . . . . - t-r=�. . . . . . . . 19 .` . . . along said direction for a ' distance 1451.06 feet; running thence South 58° 15' 00"West along Northern boundary of the Village of Greenport, 713.30 feet; running thence South 740 45' 00"West along land of the Notary Public Village of Greenport to moms- E:',R"ARA FO 13ES ment at the intersection of pro- perty of the Village of Green- 0.'otssry : r.�_e ;;tate or New York �o 4 X4;6 port and Moores Lane;running '.fi i 'oid County thence North 170 15' 00" West to a monument separating the Expires LL;..,7 3/ 19 b new Affordable Housing District from the remaining "M"zone parcel;thence North 74° 45' 00" East along said boundary between the Affor- dable Housing District and "M" zone for 635.03 feet; thence North 580 15' 00" East along said boundary between the Affordable Housing District and "M" Zone for 132.97 feet; RECFwED 8Y thence North 16° 01' 50" Wes[ ( � v( u ?Alii along said boundary between SU�IIII�W � a(I�, the Affordable Housing District U and"M"zone for 1,254.09 feet "-- to the South side of North Road or County Route 48;thence run- ning North 690 00' 20" East along Southern boundary of County Route 48;thence North 71'28'20"East along Southern boundary of County Route 48, 312.65 feet to a point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 26.4 acres. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matters should appear at the time and place above specified. -Dated: July 27, 1987 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN IT-7/30/87(65) Legal Notice FILE COPY NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of Town Law, public hearingsiwill be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road,Southold, New York in said Town on the 10th day of August, on the question of the following: 7 : 30 p.m. Public hearing on the question of approval of the preliminary mpps for the major subdivision to be known as "Cedarfields" located at Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York and bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the corner formed by the intersection of the Southerly side of North Road, also known as Middle Road or County Route 48, with the Westerly side of the property of Arthur Nichols and land, now or formerlyof Henry Fleet add Clarence Fleet, now or formerly known as Fleetfield; running thence South 16001 ' 50" East:;along said direction for a distance 1451. 06 feet; running thence South 58015 ' 00" West along Northernboundary of the Village of Greenport, 713. 30 feet; running thence South 74°45 ' 00" West along land of the Village of Greenport to monument at the intersection of property_ of the Village of Greenport and Moores Lane; running thence North 17015100" West to a monument separating the new Affordable Housing District from the remaining "M" zone parcel; thence NOrth 74045 ' 00" East along said boundary between the Affordable Housing District and "M" zone for 635 . 03 feet; thence North 58015100" East along said boundary between the Affordable Housing District and "M" Zone for 132. 87 feet; thence North 16001 ' 50" West along said boundary between the Affordable Housing District and ?'M" zone for 1, 254. 09 feet to the South dide of North Road or County Route 48; thence running North 69°00 ' 20" East along Southern boundary of County Route 48; thence North 71028 ' 20" Eadt along Southern boundary of County Route 48, 312. 65 feet to a point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 26. 4 acres. - Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place above specified. ------------------------------------------------------------- Please publish- one time on July 30,1987 and forward one (1) affidavit of publication to the Southold Town Planning Board, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk Times Long Island Traveler Watchman Supervisor Murphy Merlon Wiggin, Peconic Associates, agent Legal Notice NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of Town Law, public hearings will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road,Southold, New York in said Town on the 10th day of August. on the question of the following: 7: 30 p.m. Public hearingon the question of approval of the preliminary maps for the major subdivision to be known as "Cedarfields" located at Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York and bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the corner 6ormed by the intersection of the Southerly side of North Road, also known as Middle Road or County Route 48 , with the Westerly side of the property of Atthur Nichols and land-:now or formerlyof Henry Fleet and Clarence Fleet, now or formetly known as Fleetfield; running thence South 16°01' 50" East,-,.along said direction for a distance 1451. 06 feet; running thence South 58015100" West along Northern boundary of the Village of Greenport, 713. 30 flet; running thence South 74045 ' 00" West along land of the Village of Greenport to monument at the intersection of property_ of the Village of Greenport and Moores Lane; running thence North 17015 ' 00" West to a monument separating the new Affordable Housing District from the remaining "M" zone parcel; thence North 74045 ' 00" East along said boundary between the Affordable Housing District and "M" zone for 635 . 03 feet; the North 58015100" East along said boundary between the Affordable Housing District and "M" Zone for 132. 87 feet; thence North 16001150" West along said boundary between the Affordable Housing District and "M" zone for 1, 254. 09 feet to the South side of North Road or County Route 48; thence running North 69°00 ' 20" East along Southern boundary of County Route 48; thence North 71028120" East along Southern boundary of County Route 48, 312. 65 feet to a point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 26. 4 acres. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place above specified. ------------------------------------------------------------- m _ ~ of Please publishone time on JulA30, 1987 and forward one (1) affidavit of publication to the Southold Town Planning Board, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk Times Long Island Traveler Watchman Supervisor Murphy Merlon Wiggin, Peconic Associates, agent ! ppp NOW'. LEGAL NOTICE T\ CSI V CCS M a nm G'S C HAM0 /- STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW (SEQR) NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SUPPLEMENT AND NOTICE OF SEQRA HEARING LEAD AGENCY: Town of Southold TAX MAP NO: 1000-40-5-p/o 1 Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 DATE: July 27, 1987 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code of the implementing regulations pertaining- to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement has been completed and accepted for the proposed action described below. Comments on the Draft EIS are requested and will be accepted by the contact person until August 27, 1987. A public hearing on the Draft EIS will be held on August 10, 1987 at 7 : 30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold. NAME OF ACTION: Cedarfields Mooresland DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Cedarfields is a realty subdivision of 84 lots on 26. 4 acre in the affordable housing district in conjunction with Mooresland which is an 84 unit town house proposal on 22. 2 acres in an M-1 zone. LOCATION: County Route 48, and Moore' s Lane, Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. A COPY OF THE DRAFT EIS MAY BE 'OBTAINED FROM: Town of Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 765-1938 Please publish one time on July 30 , 1987 and forward one affidavit of publication to the Town of Southold Planning Board, Town. Hall, Main Road, Southold Ny 11971. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk Times Long Island Traveler - Watchman Merlon Wiggin, President Peconic Associates, agent LEGAL NOTICE _ STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW(SEQR) NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND SUPPLEMENT AND NOTICE OF SEQRA HEARING LEAD AGENCY: Town of Southold TAX MAP NO: 1000-40-5-p/o 1 Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 DATE: July 27, 1987 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code of the implementing regulations pertaining- to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. A Draft Environmental Impact Statement has been completed and accepted for the proposed action described below. Comments on the Draft EIS are .requested and will be accepted by the contact person until August 27, 1987. A public hearing on the Draft EIS will be held on August 10 , 1987 at 7: 30 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold. NAME OF ACTION: Cedarfields Moores.land DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Cedarfields is a realty subdivision of 84 lots on 26. 4 acre in the affordable housing district in conjunction with Mooresland which is an 84 unit town house proposal on 22. 2 acres in an M-1 zone. LOCATION: County Route 48, and Moore' s Lane, Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. A COPY OF THE DRAFT EIS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM: Town of Southold Planning Board Office Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 765-1938 Please publish one time on July 30 , 1987 and forward one affidavit of publication to the Town of Southold Planning Board, Town. Hall, Main Road, Southold Ny 11971. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk Times Long Island Traveler - Watchman Merlon Wiggin, President Peconic Associates, agent t ✓�V/l�� �l\_/1 � Legal Notice NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of Town Law, public hearingsiwill be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 10th day of August. on the question of the following: 7: 30 p.m. Public hearing;on the question of approval of the preliminary maps for the major subdivision to be known as "Cedarfields" located at Greenport, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York and bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the corner formed by the intersection of the Southerly side of North Road, also known as Middle Road or County Route 48, with the Westerly side of the property of Ahthur Nichols and land now or formerlyof Henry Fleet and Clarence Fleet, now or formetly known as Fleetfield; running thence South 16001' 50" East.:along said direction for a distance 1451. 06 feet; running thence South 58°15 ' 00" West along Northern boundary of the Village of Greenport, 713. 30 flet; running thence South 74°45 ' 00" West along land of the Village of Greenport to monument at the intersection of property_ of the Village of Greenport and Moores Lane; running thence North 17015 ' 00" West to a monument separating the new Affordable Housing District from the remaining "M" zone parcel; thence North 74045100" East along said boundary between the Affordable Housing District and "M" zone for 635. 03 feet; thence North 58015 ' 00" East along said boundary between the Affordable Housing District and "M" Zone for 132. 87 feet; thence North 16001150" West along said boundary between the Affordable Housing District and "_M" zone for 1, 254 . 09 feet to the South dide of North Road or County Route 48 ; thence running North 69°00 ' 20" East along Southern boundary of County Route 48; thence North 71028 ' 20" East along Southern boundary of County Route 48, 312. 65 feet to a point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 26. 4 acres. - --- Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place above specified. �T� M Please publish, one time on July 30 ,1987 and forward one (1) affidavit of publication to the Southold Town Planning Board, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk Times Long Island Traveler Watchman Supervisor Murphy Merlon Wiggin, Peconic Associates, agent CaLL - cub L6-C1� / _ ISfi -- al k em -4 ��-Ee1w- U L6LL I C ewef( �e P -lLC� �OUA w,DA is [TOO as - -te cud - acn-, - - - � s w 6 cam WLt j " �'^ fs i P 5�FF0(,��, P D T LD S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 2, 1987 Mr. Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Cedarfields Affordable Housing Project Dear Mr. Wiggin: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, March 30 , 1987. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch plan for the affordable housing proposal to be known as Cedarfields located at Moore ' s Lane and County Route 48, Greenport for 84 lots on 26 acres , survey dated November 24, 1986. Upon receipt of a preliminary application pursuant to Sections A106-23 and A106-42, we will schedule a public hearing on this matter. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAI N SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary P; U D T LD S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July 29, 1987 Merlon Wiggin, President Peconic Associates 1 Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Cedarfields-Moorelands DEIS Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has scheduled the above referenced proposal for two hearings on August 10th. Enclosed is a copy of the Planning Consultant's review of the draft environmental impact statement. Note that there are still some unanswered questions particulary those which ate noted in the second paragraph. It would be most helpful if you could provide this information prior to the August 10th hearing. At the least, be prepared to answer these questions in detail at the hearing. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD FOLk- FILE COPY TP- , DD S[ F Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 Tuts.,,ag`Ig87 Robert Brown 0 Sidney and Bowne and Son Hauppague, NY 11787 Dear Mr. Brown: Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following: Application of (Major subdivision, minor subdivision, site plan) Hamlet h1'ePN�o�T " MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File # Suffolk County Tax Map No. QO—S— ) Sketch plan Preliminary map Street Profiles Grading Plan Preliminary site plan Final Map Other \PS C 3� /1niSC e\\a reous i7e 1c; ss,�1 l� n \ 1 GPSC,�iNG \ Si�L U�'li Ftii Ic��p� Comments: \' S ce n r ewes O Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD CEDARFIELDS "AFFORDABLE HOUSING" (July 27, 1987 comments) 1. Sketch plan approval was subject to 100' buffer on Moore's Lane 2. Construct road as per standards, curbs, drainage structure, etc. in street "no swale" provide positive drainage system. 3. Provide sidewalks and driveway aprons. ,pS�FFU(1�C' P N D T LD S E`C Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 July -16, 1987 Mr. Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Cedarfields-Mooreland Proposals SCTM #- 1000-40-5-1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: Please let this confirm the following actions taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, July 6 , 1987 . RESOLVED THAT THE Southold Town- Planning Board accept the memorandum from Planning Consultant, David Emilita, of Szepatowski Associates which determines that the Draft Environmental Impact and Supplement for the Cedarfields and Mooresland Proposals are complete and adequate for review. RESOLVED THAT THE Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, August 10 , 1987 at 7: 30 p.m.at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold as the time and pl4ce for a public hearing on the public comments with regard to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and SLupplement for the Cedarfields/Mooresland Affordable/Housing/TownHouse proposals. Enclosed is a copy of the Planning Consultant' s memorandum for your review and consideration. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, yg� BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANTS One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 Telephone: (5 16) 477-0030 ASSOCIATES: July 14 , 1987 Fairweather/Brown Architects Gannet Fleming F"ngineers R.P. Murrow&AssuciatesSouthold Town Planning Board Winery Design Southold Town Hall Main Road Planners East Southold , L. I . F.nvironmentalPlanning New York - 11971 Wilhelm Atlantic Co. Financial Planning Re : Cedarfields Affordable Housing and Mooresland Town Houses . Gentlemen : Enclosed are twelve ( 12 ) sets of drawings and specifications of the preliminary submittal of the subject project . Request the public hearing for this preliminary submittal be held concurrent with the D. E. I . S. public hearing which is scheduled for August 10 , 1987 . Respectfully submitted , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E . Wiggi . ,M. E. President MEW/iw _gS�EF�C,�C T LD SL Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 9, 1987 Mr. Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Cedarfields/Mooresland Dear Mr. Wiggin: Please let this confirm the following action taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, June 1, 1987. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept and request compliance with the memorandum of the Planning Consultan, David Emilita, dated May 21, 1987, with regard to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Cedar- fields and Mooresland proposals located at Greenport. Enclosed is a copy of the memorandum for your review. Ifyouhave any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS � .lt July 8, 1987 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Cedarfields-Moorelands DEIS Dear Bennett, We have reviewed the Supplement to the DEIS dated June 25, 1987 and find that together with the DEIS itself, the DEIS plus supplement are complete and adequate for review and public comment. We continue to have reservations about the sufficiency of analysis with regard to the long term viability of the proposed well. Specifically, it is implied that only.,the proposed project will have any recharge impact within the zone of influence of the proposed well. This project does not exist in isolation within the zone of influence There are (presumebly) other existing , land uses and surely additional development will take place within the well' s radius. The DEIS does not address these uses. The well will also need DEC approval as well as SCDHS approval. We call this to your attention as a coordinated review with these two agencies will be extremely important on this issue. The assessment of traffic and drainage impacts will be addressed during the comment period. We are available for consultation on the above points. Sincerely., EPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES, ,�NC. RECEIVED 6Y David J.S. Emilita, AICP -SC�1HGlD ii;'iiJ11PL�,lP;lil9 60RftU Principal P1 er JUL 10 198/ DATE DJSE/kb . .. 713 3.i .35 ' - 1 :?-0d ^, 1 : . 30 S1 SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS SII July 8, 1987 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Cedarfields-Moorelands DEIS Dear Bennett, We have reviewed the Supplement to the DEIS dated June 25, 1987 and find that together with the DEIS itself, the DEIS plus supplement are complete and adequate for review and public comment. We continue to have reservations about the sufficiency of analysis with regard to the long term viability of the proposed well. Specifically, it is implied that only the proposed project will have any recharge impact within the zone of influence of the proposed well. This project does not exist in isolation within the zone of influence. There are (presumebly) other existing land uses and surely additional development will take place within the well' s radius. The DEIS does not address these uses. The well will also need DEC approval as well as SCDHS approval. We call this to your attention as a coordinated review with these two agencies will be extremely important on this issue. The assessment of traffic and drainage impacts will be addressed during the comment period. We are available for consultation on the above points. Sincerely, EPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES„I,NC. r RECEIVED BY David J.S. mi 'tat AICP 500 ��a10�1987 aeu Principal Pl er DATE DJSE/kb S,41 SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS S4 TO: Southold Planning Board RE: DEIS Cedar Fields/Mooreslands FROM: Szepatowski Associates, Inc./David Emilita DATE: May 21, 1987 We have reviewed the above referenced DEIS for sufficiency and completeness and find it inadequate for public review since several important and pertinent items are not shown on the attached site plan nor discussed in the text in enough detail to fully assess the impacts stated. The following areas need to be more fully addressed before the DEIS can be rendered complete and sufficient for review: GROUNDWATER IMPACT - No documented assessment was made on groundwater impact. No impact on the "on-site" well was stated. The well is not even located on the site plan. No qualitative analysis was shown as to nitrate levels in the on-site recharge and its effect on the supply well. Reference was made on the Scoping Checklist to our memo of 11/25/85, but no text discussion was devoted to the points raised in that memo. DRAINAGE - No drainage calculation or drainage designs were presented to substantiate the assessment of no significant drainage impact. TRAFFIC - No peak hour traffic analysis was shown. Simply refering to AADT residual capacity is not sufficient. Rey intersection analysis is necessary at Moore' s Lane at Routes 48 and 25 and Middletown Road and Route 48. It is recommended that a Sunvlement to the DEIS be prepared and submitted, addressing the points raised above. The Supplement will then be assessed for completeness before public comment. 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 _ 4i*D TLD Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 8, 1987 Mr. Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Cedarfields Subdivision at Greenport Dear Mr. Wiggin: Enclosed is a copy of correspondence received from the Highway Committee with regard to your request on the road improvements on the above mentioned affordable housing project. If you have any questions , please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, II BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. APPENDIX A EAI ENVIRMPIENTAL ASSESSMENT - PANT I Pro+act Information - NOTICE: This document 4. desImed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant affect on the snvrremant. please ceplote the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval NO My be subject forfurther verift CatiOn and public review. Provide any additional Information you believe Will be needed to complete PANTS 2 mod D. It is eaueetad that completion of the EAF will be dependant on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If Information requiring such additional wort is un4va9tble, 90 indicate and specify each instance. UK OF PROJECT: NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWN (If Different) Cedarfields Costello/Bracken , Carroll Wiggins Street ADDRESS AND NMI[ OF APPLICANT (3 - - - - Peconic Associates Inc . Green ort N. Y . 11944 jP"Z7 uu pr One Bootleg A1.1_ey0 (516 ) 477- 1199 76"W Green ort N. Y. 1 19 44 uu P OES01PT104 OF PROJECT: (Briefly describe type of project or action) c on s t r u c t i on of e i g h t y- four (84 ) single family units of affordable housing , AHD. (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. If not applicable) A. SITE DESCRIPTION (physical setting of overall project, both developed and unde"109" areas) 1. Gneral character of the land: Generally uniform $lope X Generally woven and ronin; or Irregular 2. Present land use: Uroan Industrial cdamarcial _, Suburban —_, Rural _. Forest Agriculture _,�ro pe n -'=u Se S. Total acreage of oroject area: 26 acres. Aaorosiate acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After Copletion Meador or Brushland _acres _aeras Hater Surface Area _acres -ac-Is Forested acres _acres Unvegetated (rocs, earth or fill) __acres -Acres Agricultural acres -acres —' Roads, buildings Metland (Freshwater or and other paved Tidal as oar Articles surfaces Acres _Acres 24. 25 or F.C.L.) _acres _acres Other (indican tyea) _acre 4. vhat IS -redominant Soil type(S) on nrojeet site? R 1 V e r h g Lex_...... S. A cre tner• 7egroc. outcro7oines an ,mioct site? , :-at 4s aeotn to oedrdc%Q N1A _('n -eat) 9l V:5 A. Approximate percentage of proposal$ project Site with slope$: 01051 0(k; INM _S; 15S or grater S. �✓ 7. Is project contiguoto, or contain a building or site listed on the 14400041 Register of Historic _ Places?- _ Yes X Ho g. Mat is the depth to the water table? 12 feet 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? —Yes X Na 10. Das project site conUt6 any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered - Yes A •b, according to - Identify each specter 11. Are than any unique orusual land form en the project site? (I-*- Cliffs. dues, other geological fermtias - Yes 14o. (Describe 1 12. Is the project site presently used by the COMMity err neighberheod as an open span or mmtiw am - Ya _.L_NO' 13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas anori to be important to the Coneeity? Yea _ _No id. Stream within or contiguous to project am: a. Now of strew ws now of river to which it is tributary N/A 19. Lata. Ponds. Netlaod ams within or contiguous to project area. a. game N/A : b. Size (in acres) 16. Mat is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a lµ mile radius of the Project (e.g. single faedly residential, R-2) and the scale of develaimat (e.9. 2 story). Singqle family residential 9. PROJECT DESCIIIPTION �-- 1. Physical dimensions and scale Of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) . a. TOUT contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 48 ams. b. Project acreage developed: 24 acres initially:24r aeres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 8 d. Longth of project, in milts: N/A if appropriate) e. if project is in expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square fact- 4" ; developed acreage f. Number of Off-street Parting spaces existing 0 proposed 9. Maximum venicular trios generated per hour (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Numoer and type of housing units: .no Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial 84 Ultimate 84 i. If: orientation - "eighoornood-City-Regional Estimated Employment Commercial Industrial J. Total height of tallest ronoseo structure _Viz_ f • story 2. Now much natural material (i.e. rock. earth. etc.) will be removed from the site • tons _J Cubic yards. 3. Nor many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs. ground Covers) will be removed from site - 20 acres. a. Will any mature forest over 100 years old) or other locally-tegortant vegetation be removed by tremas project? Yes �X No S. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that mmoad during construction? —.LYes _res 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction24 months. (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased project: a. Total number of ptoses anticipated Yb. b. Anticioated date of commencement phase 1 —Month �w ear (including demolition) c. Approximate completion data final phase month year. d. Is phase t financially dependent on subfedirat phases? Ya �Np 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes ONO 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 50 ; after project is convince Q. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project L__ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Ya X No. If yp, "plain: 12. a. is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? X Ya Mo. b. If yes. indicate type of waste (s g-. industrial. etc.) sewage - storm C. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluat will be disCILIrl" N/A 13. Will surface area of existing lakes ponds, streams, bays or other surface increased be incrsed dr decreased by proposal? Yes Xhe. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain} Yes ONO 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waster X Yes Ib b. If yes. will an existing solid waste diseosal facility be used? X Yes Yb t. If yes. give mama: Town Landf i 11 : location Cutchoaue d. 11111 any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? —Yes —2Lha 16. Will project use herbicides or pmsti Cide3? —Yes X No 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Yes 0-Ne 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local amoiace noise levels? _Yes ,(_No 19. Will project result in an increase in energy use? XYes Yb. If yes. Indicate type($) residential heating & household electrical 20. If water supoly is from wells indicate pumping Capacity 250 gals/minute. 21. total anticinated water usage per C•y 2 z.J_U44is/day. 22. Zoning: a. What is dominant zoning classification of sitd _AHD � o. Current soetiric zoning classiflcatian of site AHD _ c. '.s or000seo use co.sisten: witn nresent zoning? yes d. If nam indicate desired zoning 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? --.Yes �_No o. Odea protect Involve state or Federal funding or financing? __.—Yes _X No c. Local and Regional approvals: Appproval Required submittal Approval (Yea, No (Type) (Date) (Gate) City, Wlla Bare .•1US. - Vin_ 9 City, T . 9< Planning Bard p�T0' S CIBoard City un Health Department OtMr al ncies agent .�. .� State Agencies agencies - State Agencies Federal Agencies ILL C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as my be needed to clarify your project. If Owl are or may be say adverse Impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such Impacts and the measures Which Can be taken to mitigate or avoid,7. _.._. k ►RVANEN•sutiATUNE: � ^=�-_-'--' ,` � ( Peconic Associates , Inc . ) TITU: d d e n t REPMVFTIN6: Costello/Bracken . Carroll DATE: December 5 , 1986 .a. �✓ f c(f Cj Co- at-�DJE�)S �k(,r es5 s fp c_ t wsjCiL (�hC" ��sv cfivF,�- Jae d t 42�-YLLOft, fQ fIL N 1p&� , 6Cnr�C142z��G V c2l c� (( �ricAt ,f�ti.-hc� Say.ye r ,j� c �'CC S� l�� ct Lr�r,1,tnS h 5�C1 Uf�e- L} CIS s C-314ttivlo-) � tee � S f C P wQ D F ,.. COPY T �� � �,�LD I S , . tae mY d 1 � �n Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 August 3 , 1987 Mr. Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Cedarfields at Greenport SCTM # 1000-40-5-1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: Please let this confirm the following action taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, July 27 , 1987 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, August 10, 1987 at 7: 30 p.m, at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold as the time and palce for a public hearing on the preliminary maps for the major subdivision to be known as Cedarfields located at Greenport, 84 lots on 26. 4 acres in the affordable housing district, SCTM # 1000-40-5-1. Enclosed is a copy of the legal notice.. for your files. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. S�FFair D TQr LD S Q� Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 29 , 1987 Mr. Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Subdivision for Cedarfields at Greenport Dear Mr. Wiggin: Please let this confirm the following action by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, April 27 , 1987 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept and make the necessary referrals for the major subdivision proposal to be known as "Cedarfields" located at Moore' s Lane and County Route 48 , Greenport. David Emilita will be reviewing the DEIS submitted for completeness. Upon receipt of his review we will advise you. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary P. S. - Would you please forward six (6) preliminary prints for, the referrals. Thank you. c��'FFO(K�, P, , i D T �__„ . � LD A S 1 Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 30 , 1987 Mr. Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Cedarfields at Greenport Mooresland at Greenport Dear Mr. Wiggin: In review of the file for the above mentioned proposals, a SEQRA Review fee has not been paid. Therefore, would you please forward a check in the amount of $1500 . 00 for the SEQRA Review Fee. This will cover David Emilita' s review of the DEIS for both proposals. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary April 24 , 1987 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, L . I . New York - 11971 Dear Mr . Orlowski : In response to the Southold Town Planning Board's request for a preliminary site plan of the proposed housing projects , i . e . Cedarfields and Mooresland, located on Moores Lane and County Road 48 at Greenport , we are pleased to submit 15 copies of the same for your perusal . Sincerely , n Donald Bracken RECEIVED BY SOUTHOLD L)A TE a4 9�c_ 0-'1 April 24 , 1987 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, L . I . New York - 11971 Dear Mr . Orlowski : In response to the Southold Town Planning Board' s request for a preliminary site plan of the proposed housing projects, i . e . Cedarfields and Mooresland, located on Moores Lane and County Road 48 at Greenport , we are pleased to submit 15 copies of the same for your perusal . Sincerely , Donald Bracken RECEIVED BY SOUTHOLD i01'7d will,. �O BOARD 0? 9 �/ DATE APR 24 1987 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: h.w Liber . . . . .. . . . . . . . Page . .. . .�I I . . . . . . . . . . . On Jt/��� 15 �70J i . . . ; Liber . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .... .. . Page . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . Liber . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . Page . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. Liber Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . On . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ; Liber . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . ....... Page . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • oras distributee . . . .. .. . . . . .. .... .... .. .. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. . .. ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S. The area of the land is OC9.e .M. 57, acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except V Wil. r+�'�.Y� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . !� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 7. The land is encumbered by . . . .0! . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . .. . mortgage (s) as follows: / r (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . ! .� S �. . . Page J . . . . . . , , • . in original amount . of �DD 666 9i do $. . . . . . .. . . . . . . unpaid amount $ . ,5�l . . . . . . held by . . . .. . . .. . . . . . address (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . .. . . Pa ' ge • . . • . . • • • • • • • • . . . . . , in original amount of . . . .. . . . . . . . . . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . held b . . . .. .. .. . . . . . address . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Mortgage reco ed in Liber . . . . . . . . . Page . , in original amoun of . . . . .. . .. . .. . unpaid amoun held by .... . . . . . . . address . . . . 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except , 1;11"I IL . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. The land lies in the following ,zoning use districts . . ✓•� ./. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (d*OPNK) lie in a Water Distric or Water S pply Distri arae of Dis- trict, if within a District, is .t&r 13. Water mains will be laid by andX (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . . . . . �. . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . • • • • • .. • . . . . . . • .. • • • • • . . . . . . . and (pO_ (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. /J 15. Gas mains will be installed by . . . . . �� and (a) (no) charge will Ffe nfad for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "L'" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Lay. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The/applicant /bed ost of gradin and require public im rovement will he $. . dule "E" ereto annexed nd request hat the turity of thPero .. . .. . . . . . years. T e Perform ce Bond tll be writte bya licensed suretle "E show on Sched e "F". - 'i DATE .�� /.. .. .. . . . . .. 190 � �L ..... . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . (N oAppy (Signature and Title) (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. ss: On the . . . .. ..4:2. ./`.". day of. .. /�j�!F.�.. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .1 195 ':7 ., before me personally came pL�. . dfl . rN. .. .. . . . . . . . to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . . .. . . . . . . . executed the same. . . . . . . Notaryepl?-77e IClA G /YJOO�t Nor9+eY Pv6Uc $THEE aF nr7HYo��c "v-o 9(96/6//08 �SvFi�GiL Co�/NTY STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . , , , , , . . pmm.s6.oN 6 v e Es 4/14-/F-e On the . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . day . .. . . . . . . . . . of . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19. .. . . ., before me personally came . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . . . . . . . . . .. . resides at No. . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . is the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . of . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that . . . . . . . . . .. . knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. and that . . . . . . . . . . . . signed . .. .. . . . . . . . . . name theketo by like order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notary Public Ln COUNCILMEN O� TELEPHONE Raymond W. Edwards "'0,� �� (516)765-1891 Paul Stoutenburgh James A. Schondebare COUNCILMEN Jean W. Cochran TOWN OF SOUTHOLD George L. Penny IV Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 April '6, 1987 To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Southold Town Board Highway Committee Re: Highway Specifications - Costello AHD Project In response to your recent letter concerning reduction of the highway specifications for the Costello AHD Project, please be advised that the Highway Committee recommends that said roads be built' to current High- way Specifications. 41�\161 S�FFo�c P D T LD S y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 1, 1987 Councilwoman Cochran Councilman Schondebare Councilman Stoutenburgh Town Highway Committee Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Costello Affordable Housing Project Dear Committee Members: Enclosed please find correspondence from the consultant for the above mentioned proposal located at Greenport. We request that you review this and advise our Board of your recommendations regarding the granting of waivers on the highway specifications. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very y tru� urs� '� BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs ll'� • �C, n1 �filiAR i2.,g:-1 it 1 PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE ENGINEERING & PLANNING CONSULTANTS One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 Telephone: (5 16) 477-0030 March 26 , 1987 ASSOCIATES: Fairweather/Brown Architects Gannet Fleming Southold Town Planning Board Engineers Southold Town Hall R.P.Morrow&Associates Main Road Winery Design Southold , L . I . Planners East New York - 11971 Environmental Planning Re : Cedarfields Affordable Wilhelm Atlantic Co. Housing Project . Financial Planning Gentlemen : During the sketch plan review scheduled for subject project on March 39th, request these additional items be discussed so as to expedite the project : 1 . Width of streets and roads . 2 . Storm drainage to include consideration of drainage swales versus curbs . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC. Merlon E . Wiggin, Ph .D. ,M. E . President MEW/iw cn ' m � 9 v � m o D � Z � v c rl v n i Eli7eAZ A LIEMMFNT 7,—A�14 N m 'D o Suw[E cz C7?NEc/!QV A.�Ro vs. .� Rl m V m D �-- EASEMENT LINE - EASEMENT LIA0. ;..q --q N R.OW. LINE R.O.W. LINE O Z ��m O Z To D \ = m 12'-0' 25'-o" 25'•0° v 6=0" G O [i 0� _05'_p66_p50 D Z1 D /:3 X 6"- 4' CROWN(TYP.) 6' I v4�,.1, 33p'F. cn r M4k. ":I' ld':i �a 1 m O 3�P M4k. Q C CONC.HEADER CURB B,. 12'-0" X ""I B" See DWG.NO.SD851 4" TOPSOILED 4"TOPSOILED D O 8 SEEDED B SEEDED L v 0 11 2" WEARING COURSE ' O w cn 2 1/2" BINDER COURSE C m w 00 FINE GRADE - 0 4"COMPACTED BASE COURSE ' C 3/4" STONE BLEND OR CRUSHED CONCRETE N CDQ CA Z . TYPICAL SECTION WITH GRASSED SWALE O W p Z AR 131987 STATE OF NEW YORK) ss : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) J. KEVIN McLAUGHLIN, being duly sworn, deposes and says : 1 . I am acting of counsel to Irving L. Price, Jr. , attorney for John Costello, regarding certain property owned by Mr. Costello at Greenport, Tc,wn of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York consisting of 48 . 7075 acres of land. Mr. Costello took title to this property by deed dated January 23 , 1985 , and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk' s Office on February 28 , 1985, in Liber 9744 of Deeds at Page 17 . 2 . Said owner has received a change of zone to Affordable Housing District for a 26. 4525 acre portion of said land and has applied to the Southold Town Planning Board for subdiVision approval. 3 . Based upon my review of the files in this matter and upon conversation with John Costello, I hereby certify that the following are the only entities with any interest, direct or indirect, in said premises : (1) John Costello, 206 Wiggins Street, Greenport, New York: owner in fee; (2) East End Associates, a domestic partnership with a place of business at 20 Church Street, Patchogue, New York: mortgagee; (3) Sarlott Properties , a domestic partnership with a place of business at 206 Wiggins Street, Greenport, New York: financial interest in the subject property; and (4) Diane Carroll, (No I-) Wheeler Road, Old Field, New York; and Donald Bracken, 33 Gall R -ad, Setauket, New York: contract vendees. 4 . No other entities have an interest in said premises. 5 . I make this affidavit knowing that the Southold Town Planning Board will rely thereon*JkIf-N (L.S. ) 2 cLAUGH N Sworn to before me this 4th day of March, 1987 . t � � Notary Public LAURIE E.GRAEB N0WV public,State of New York Tam Egtraaf 8 t 30,198E • P ��FFO(k��� D F T $b a :I LD g'�.,� . � gTY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 17, 1987 Merlon Wiggin, President Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 Re: EIS Process for "Mooresland" and Costello Affordable Housing Dear Mr. -Wiggin: Upon consultation with David Emilita, the Board feels that a combined EIS process is the most comprehensive and expedient method to evaluate the two projects. Consequently, one EIS should be prepared containig text sections pertinent to either one or the other development or a combined section when addressing undifferentiated impacts. We have prepared a single scoping checklist based on your two checklists and on input from the Town Board, that contains a suggested treatment of each section. Please review it and if agreeable use it as your outline for the EIS. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to -contact the Planning Board office or David Emilita. Very truly yours, ��/ , en�rlow�t1 . , Chairman dms Southold Town Planning Board enc. - cc: Town Board John Costello Donald Bracken Diane Carroll C*9c�-C 1� — S k k Y . iE <, y e 1. Cover Sheet ntroduction All EIS's(Draft or Final)shall begin with a cover The following checklist of topics is intended sheet that indicates: as a starting point for developing a detailed scope A. Whether it is a draft or final statement for a project-specific Draft Environmental Impact B. Name or other descriptive title of the project Statement. Typically, no one project will require a C. Location(county and town,village or city)of discussion of all the topic areas contained in this the project document. Through the scoping process, this list of D. Name and address of the lead agency which topics should be refined to reflect issues unique to required preparation of the statement and the proposed project. Topic areas may be deleted, the name and telephone number of a person added, or elaborated upon, to arrive at the final at the agency to be contacted for further in- scoping document. formation The purpose of the checklist format is to E. Name and address of the preparers of any identify the basic topic areas for the Draft EIS. This Portion of the statement and a contact name is accomplished by reviewing the list and placing a and telephone number F. Date of acceptance check in the box located to the left of those topics which should be discussed. The model scoping G. b the case of a Draftt EIS, the deadline date the Draft EIS checklist can also be used as a worksheet, including which comments are due should be in- dicated comments, suggestions and identification of the particular example(s) that are relevant to a detailed 11. Table of Contents and Summary discussion of the topic or issue that has been check- A table of contents and a brief summary are re- ed. Conversely, those topics which are not checked, quired for Draft and Final EIS's exceeding 10 pages are issues not associated with the project, and may in length. However, one should include these be eliminated from discussion in the Draft EIS. features in any size EIS to provide the review agency Minimum requirements for any Draft EIS are with easy reference to EIS topics. already checked for convenience. The summary should include: The next step is to expand the list to include A. Brief description of the action or elaborate on those topics unique to the proposed B, Significant, beneficial and adverse impacts, project. A blank sheet is included at the end of the (issues of controversy must be specified) checklist for such additional information. C. Mitigation measures proposed The scoping process involves several steps in D. Alternatives considered addition to compiling a list of topics. Scoping also E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals, includes discussiors on the quantity and quality of funding) information required and the methods for obtaining that data. 111. Description of the Proposed Action NOTE: This checklist was designed to be Place a cheek in the box to the left of those used in conjunction with the section on scoping con- topics to be'included in the draft EIS. tained in the SEQR Guideline-Draft and Final EIS's. A. PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED It is also important to emphasize that this checklist 1. Background and history should serve only as a model to assist in the scoping 2. Public need for the project, and of a Draft EIS. It should not be used as a substitute municipality objectives based on adopted for actively scoping a Draft EIS for a specific pro- community development plans ject. 3. Objectives of the project sponsor C-1 A B. LOCATION Natural Resources n ri. Establish geographic boundaries of the A. GEOLOGY project (use of regional and local scale maps is recommended) ❑ 1. Subsurface wt. Description of access to site a.)composition and thickness of 6-rDescription of existing zoning of propos- subsurface material ed site examples: 4. Other: —depth to, and nature of, bed- rock formations and imperme- ® C. DESIGN AND LAYOUT able layers —occurrence of an extractive tool. Total site area mineral resource a.)proposed impervious surface area —usefulness as construction (roofs, parking lots, roads) material b.)amount of land to be cleared b.)earthquake potential c.)open space 1f2. Structures 2. Surface a.)gross leaseable area (GLA), if ap- ve.) list of soil types plicable discussion of soil characteristics b.)layout of buildings (attached, enclos- examples: ed, separate) —physical properties (indication c.)site plans and profile views of soils hydrological (infiltra- Lv-3 Parking tion) capabilities) a.)pavement area —engineering properties (soil b.)number of spaces and layout bearing capacity) 4. Other: c.)distribution of soil types at pro- ject site B` D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION vli.)suitability for use M Lif. Construction examples: a.)total construction period anticipated —agriculture b.)schedule of construction ) —recreation c.)future potential development, on site —construction or on adjoining properties —mining d.)other: e.) other: 2. Operation Pr3. Topography a.)type of operation description of topography at pro- b.)schedule of operation ject site c.)other: examples: —slopes ❑ E. CLOSURE AND POST CLOSURE PLANS —prominent or unique features (for projects of planned limited life such as b.)description of topography of sur- landfills) rounding area BAF. APPROVALS B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Required changes or variances to the zon- 1. Groundwater ing regulations ✓a.) location and description of 2. Other permit approval or funding re- aquifers and recharge areas quirements examples: —depth to water table —seasonal variation IV. Environmental Setting —quality Place a check in the box to the left of those —quantity topics to be included in the Draft EIS. —flow C-2 f b.)identification of present uses and c.) identification of any sensitive level of use of groundwater receptors in project area examples: examples: —location of existing wells —hospitals, schools, nursing —public/private water supply homes, parks —industrial uses d.)description of existing monitor- -agricultural uses ing program (if applicable) ❑ 2. Surface water Q"D. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY_ a.)location and description of sur- [� 1. Vegetation face waters located on project •.e.) list vegetation types on the pro- site or those that may be in- ject site and within the surround- fluenced by the project examples: ing area —seasonal variation r.b•)characteri of site vegetation characteristics —quality examples: —classification according to —species present and abundance New York State Department of Health —age —size b.)identification of uses and level of —distribution use of all surface waters —dominance examples: —community types ! —public/private water supply —unique, rare and endangered C —industrial uses species —agricultural uses —value as habitat for wildlife —recreation —productivity c.)description of existing drainage areas, patterns and channels ❑ 2. Fish and Wildlife d.)discussion of potential for a.) list of fish and wildlife species on flooding, siltation, erosion and ! the project site and within sur- eutrophication of water sources rounding area, including migratory and resident species ❑ C. AIR RESOURCES b.)discussion of fish and wildlife population characteristics ❑ 1. Climate examples: a.)discussion of seasonal variations —species present and abundance and extremes —distribution examples: —dominance —temperature —unique, rare and endangered —humidity species —precipitation —productivity —wind ❑ 3. Wetlands ❑ 2. Air quality a.) list wetland areas within or Ion- a.)description of existing air quality tiguous to the project site levels b.)discuss wetland characteristics examples: examples: —list the National and State Air —acreage Quality Standards for the pro- —vegetative cover ject area and the compliance —classification status for each standard —benefits of wetland such as b.)identification of existing sources flood and erosion control, or pollutants-fixed or mobile recreation C-3 c: Human Resources . CSC. COMMUNITY SERVICES(for this section in- A. TRANSPORTATION clude a list of existing facilities and a discus- e`1. Transportation services sion of existing levels of usage and pro- re.)description of the size, capacity jected future needs) and condition of services B"1. Educational facilities examples: 9'2. Police protection —roads, canals, railroads, bridges 9"3. Fire protection —parking facilities o-4. Health care facilities —traffic control 5. Social services ✓6.)description of current level of use • Recreational facilities of services examples: Utilities —a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic ❑ 8. Other: flow —vehicle mix —sources of existing traffic Tr D. DEMOGRAPHY volume & 1. Population characteristics ❑ 2. Public transportation tr<discussion of the existing popula- a.)description of the current tion parameters availability of service examples: b.)description of present level of —distribution use —density E33. Pedestrian environment —household size and composi- ❑ 4. Other: tion b.)discussion of projections for C 'B. LAND USE AND ZONING population growth ❑ 2'1. Existing land use and zoning 2. Other: bbe!)description of the existing land use of the project site and the & E. CaJTURAL RESOURCES surrounding area 1. Visual resources examples: ✓d.)description of the physical —commercial character of the community —residential example: —agricultural —urban vs. rural —business %40$description of natural areas of —retail significant scenic value —industrial c.) identification of structures of —vacant significant architectural design L,ko.)description of the existing zoning of site and surrounding area ❑ 2. Historic and archaeological resources ❑ 2. Land use plans a.)location and description of a.)description of any land use plans historic areas or structures listed or master plans which include on State or National Register or project site and surrounding area designated by the community b.)discussion of future development b.)identification of sites having trends or pressures potential significant ar- ❑ 3. Other: chaeological value C-4 C' ❑ 3. Noise B. WATER RESOURCES a.) identification of existing level of 1. Groundwater noise in the community ✓d.)design adequate system of treat- b. identification of major sources of ment for stormwater runoff prior noise to recharge of groundwater examples: tib.)maintain permeable areas on the —airports site —major highways c.) institute a program for monitor- -industrial/commercial facili- ing water quality in adjacent ties wells ❑ 4. Other: d.)other: 2. Surface water a.)ensure use of soil erosion control 90456 V. Significant Environmental Impacts techniques during construction Identify those aspects of the environmental set- and operation to avoid siltation ting in Section IV that may be adversely or examples: (V beneficially affected by the proposed action and re- —hay bales '({et(2) quire discussion. —temporary restoration of AVI. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmen- vegetation to disturbed areas Mtal impact —landscaping Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential ]design adequate stormwater con- C adverse impacts identified in Section V. The follow- trol system ing is a brief listing of typical measures used for c.) restrict use of salt or sand for some of the major areas of impact. road and parking area snow removal Natural Resources d.)avoid direct discharges to surface A ❑M water resources A. GEOLOGY e.)other: 1. Subsurface a.) use excavated material for land reclamation b.)use facility wastes (ash, sludge) for land reclamation P�OC. AIR RESOURCES c.)other: 1. Air quality 4o*2. Surface tea.)assure proper construction prac- a.) use topsoil stockpiled during tices construction for restoration and examples: landscaping —fugitive dust control b.)minimize disturbance of non- —proper operation and construction sites maintenance of construction c.)design and implement soil ero- equipment sion control plan b.)design traffic improvements to d.)other: reduce congestion and vehicle 3. Topography delay a.)avoid construction on areas of c.)install and ensure the proper steep slope operation of emission control b.)design adequate soil erosion devices devices to protect areas of steep d.)initiate a program for monitoring slope of air quality c.)other: e.)other: C-5 R-b. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY CJ''B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Vegetation 1. Existing land use and zoning Va.)restrict clearing to only those ✓ a.)design project to comply with ex- areas necessary isting land use plans ✓'b.)preserve part of site as a natural vb.)design functional and visually ap- area pealing facility to set standard yc.)after construction, landscape site and precedent for future with naturally occurring vegeta- surrounding land use tionc.)other: d.)purchase open space at another CYC. COMMUNITY SERVICES location and dedicate to local 1. Police protection government or conservation a.)minimize local police protection organization responsibilities by providing e.)other: private security force 2. Fish and Wildlife b.)provide security systems, alarms a.)provide adequate habitat(shelter for facility and food) for remaining wildlife c.)provide equipment, funds or ser- species vices directly to the community b.)schedule construction to avoid d.)other: sensitive periods of fish and l✓2. Fire protection wildlife life cycles ✓•a.)use construction materials that c.)other: minimize fire hazards b.)incorporate sprinkler and alarm systems into building design c.)provide equipment, funds or ser- vices directly to the community d.)other: e''A. TRANSPORTATION t,.•-3. Utilities 1. Transportation services , -a.) install utility services ya.)design adequate and safe access underground to project site to handle pro- %.-'b.)incorporate water saving fixtures jected traffic flow into facility design b.)install adequate traffic control ✓c.)incorporate energy-saving devices measures into facility design ✓E.)optimize use of parking areas wo�d.)other: d.)encourage car pooling and opera- D. CULTURAL RESOURCES tion of facility during non-peak traffic times tri, Visual resources e.)design special routing and 6010"a.)design exterior of structure to restricted hours for delivery truck physically blend with existing traffic surroundings f.) other: mob.)minimize visual impact through thoughtful and innovative design 2. Public transportation aof lighting and signs (consider: .)adjust public transportation routes and schedules to service height, size, intensity, glare and the facility hours of lighting operation) b.)encourage use of public transpor• 1�c.)design landscaping to be visually pleasing and to serve as a buffer talion by using incentive pro- between surrounding land uses grams for employees or by sell- ing tickets in facility parking areas, operational equip•, ment and facilities c.)other: d.)other: C-6 m C t'E. ALTERNATIVE LAND USE XI. Effects on the Use and Conservation of Energy .i1 oSuitability of site for other uses Resources a.) other types of commercial uses Identify the energy sources to be used, an- b.)other types of industry ticipated levels of consumption and ways to reduce w-r)different types of housing energy consumption. The examples listed below are d.)other: typical issues to be considered when addressing this xx 2. Public vs. private use topic. n Er-F' NO ACTION G CSA. PROPOSED ENERGY SOURCES AND M wwY' Impacts of no action ALTERNATIVES a.)effect on public need b.)effect on private developers'need ❑IB. ANTICIPATED SHORT-TERM/LONG-TERM c.)beneficial or adverse en- LEVELS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION vironmental impacts ❑ C. INDIRECT EFFECTS ON ENERGY CON- SUMPTION ❑ G. OTHER: 1. Increased dependence on automobile use IX. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of 2. Increased levels of traffic due to pro- Resources posed project Identify those natural and human resources lisle ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES in Section IV that will be consumed, converted o made unavailable for future use. L—f'- Design methods to reduce fuel use for heating, cooling, and lighting X. Growth Inducing Aspects ►-`Q.)conventional technology Describe in this section the potential growth examples: aspects the proposed project may have. Listed —insulation below are examples of topics that are typically af- —thermopane windows fected by the growth induced by a project. —use of low wattage lights CSA. POPULATION &..b.)innovative technology 1. Increases in business and resident examples: population due to the creation or —heat pumps relocation of business —solar panels t/L. Increases in resident population due —wind energy to the construction of housing —use of waste heat from an in- dustrial plant ❑ B. SUPPORT FACILITIES ..-e-.}efficient layout 1. Businesses created to serve the in- examples: creased population —orientation of structures in 2. Service industries created to supply relation to summer and winter new facility sunlight clustering of structures to ❑ C. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL maximize common walls 1. Introduction or improvement of in- V-=shortening of utility runs frastructure (roads, waste disposal, y­shared insulation and heating 2. Indirect energy benefits sewers, water) to service proposed project a.) location and design of facility to 2. Creation of further growth potential accomodate mass transit by construction of improved in- b.)use of shuttle buses frastructure c.) location of facility to minimize travel distance ❑ D. OTHER: ❑ E. OTHER: C 2. Historic and archaeologic resources PI-A. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND a.)allow historical and ar- TECHNOLOGIES chaeological officials access to v^r. Site layout the project site during excavation a.)density and location of structures b.)devote space within project site b.)location of access routes, park- to a display of historical and ar- ing and utility routes chaeological artifacts of local in- r,/2. Orientation terest a.)compatibility with slope and c.)preserve architecturally signifi- drainage patterns cant structures and make a b.)site size and setback re- photographic and statistical quirements record of those that must be 3. Technology destroyed a.)pollution control equipment d.)other: b.)innovatIve vs. proven 4--3'Noise technologies re )schedule construction/operation 4. Mix of activities to occur during "normal a.)addition of businesses which business" hours minimizing would affect the operational noise impact during sensitive nature of the facility times (early morning, night) assure adherence to construction noise standards 0'� ALTERNATIVE SITES r c.)design berms and landscaping to tet. Limiting factors block and absorb noise a.)availability of land d.)other: b.)suitability of alternate site to ac- comodate design requirements c.)availability of utilities d.)suitable market area e.)compatibility with local zoning AVII. Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot and master plan be Avoided if the Project is Implemented f.) compatibility with regional ob- Identify those adverse environmental effects in jectives Section V that can be expected to occur regardless g•)accessibility of site to transporta- of the mitigation measures considered in Section tion routes and the service VI. population L-C. ALTERNATIVE SIZE ✓I. Increase or decrease project size to minimize possible impacts 6,.2. Increase or decrease project size to Vlll. Alternatives correspond to market and com- MThis section contains categories of alternatives munity needs with examples. Discussion of each alternative should be at a level sufficient to permit a com- parative assessment of costs, benefits and en- ❑ D. ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION/OPERA- vironmental risks for each alternative. It is not ac- TION SCHEDULING ceptable to make simple assertions that a particular 1. Commence construction at a dif- c alternative is or is not feasible. Identify those ferent time categories of alternatives which should be included 2. Phase construction/operation in the EIS by placing a check in the box located to 3. Restrict construction/operation the left of the topic. work schedule C-7 G XII. Appendices Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the EIS. A. List of underlying studies, reports and infor- mation considered and relied on in preparing state- ment B. List all federal, state, regional, or local agen- cies, organizations, consultants and private persons consulted in preparing the statement C. Technical exhibits (if any) at a legible scale D. Relevant correspondence regarding the pro- jects may be included (required in the Final EIS) Additional Draft EIS Scoping Topics Indicate any additional topics for discussion in the Draft EIS. Attach additional sheets if necessary. C-9 SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS S4' TO: Southold Planning Board RE: Costello Rezoning DEIS FROM: David Emilita DATE: 11/25/85 The Planning Board should go on record with regard to the Costello Rezoning DEIS. The DEIS is basically very similar to the one prepared for the former annexation effort and so much of its content has been reviewed and commented on previously. This project, however, has potentially significant nt and different impacts from the annexation and these need to be addressed. These are as follows: 1) "M" Zone vs "HD" District The "M" Zone will not entirely accomplish the applicants stated r. desire, that is to produce affordable single family lots. Nor will it in itself accomplish affordable housing of any kind. It d is thus recommended that the "HD" District be applied to this site as soon as feasible. In the interim, covenants and restrictions should be utilized or a rezoning conditioned on the provision of affordable housing as defined by the Town. 2) Impact on on-site-well It has not been clearly demonstrated what effect that 180 dwellings on 48 acres will have on an on-site well in terms of recharge quality. Input from the Village water system and the r County Health Department would seem necessary in this regard. i II Existing water quality in the test well is acceptable, but there will be a loss of recharge due to consumptive use and wastewater collection, and there will be an introduction of lawn fertilizers I and other household contaminants into the recharged groundwater. The impact on groundwater, (and the on-site well) has not been stated. �I Input from the Village of Greenport's water system and from the Suffolk County Department of Health would also seem necessary in the event that one or both public utilities would prove to be unavailable. ( A letter from the Health Department on the annexation alternative is included in this DEIS. We don't feel this is acceptable as a review of this project under SEQR. ) i In conclusion, we agree with the stated merits of the rezoning i proposed, but some conditions need to be placed on it to assure the Town that the stated purpose will be achieved. DE/jmb i 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 i; i Cly • • • • S�FFotKc P D T 4 = LD S Y • Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 12, 1987 Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin PResident Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Costello Affordable Housing Project Dear Mr. Wiggin: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, March 9 , 1987 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare themselves lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act for the major subdivision of Costello for 84 lots on 26. 4 acres in the affordable housing district located at Greenport. If you have any questions , please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary 5�FF011(e -c T , . : LD S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 12 , 1987 Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin PResident Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Costello Affordable Housing Project Dear Mr. Wiggin: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, March 9, 1987. WHEREAS, John Costello, has applied to the Southold Town Planning Board for a subdivision for 84 lots on 26. 4 acres in the affordable housing district located at County Route 48 and Moore' s Lane, Greenport, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That pursuant to the provision of Article 8 of the Environemntal conservation Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed is Type I and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2 . That the Planning Board shall file and circulate such determination as required by' the aforementioned law, rules, and code. 3. That the Planning Bord immediately notify the applicant' s agent, Merlon E. Wiggin, of this determination, and further request said applicant' s agent to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with the scope and contents required by the Planning Board and Town Planner, all in accordance with said law, rules, and code. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Merlon 09gin + Page 2 • 3/12/87 ------------------------------------------------------------ Very truly yours , (0 �vot-� BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary 49 q Q.� �l P a D T LD S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT March 9 , 1987 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes , the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, does hereby dtermine that the action descriped below is Type I and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Proposal is for a subdivision of 26. 4 acres into 84 residential lots in the affordable housing district located at County Route 48 and Moore ' s Lane, Greenport to be referred to as "Costello Affordable Housing Project" , tax map no 1000-40-5-p/ol. Copies mailed to : Henry Williams, DEC Commissioner NYS DEC at Stony Brook Sufoflk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor Merlon Wiggin, agent ��FFo�c T LD Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 7, 1986 Mr. John Costello P.O. Box AK Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Affordable Housing Proposal Moore' s Lane, Greenport Dear Mr. Costello: The Planning Board has reviewed the above mentioned proposal with the Town Attorney and offer the following as their reco endation to obtaining affordable housing on the site. Set-off 1/2 of the property and do 1008 Affordable Housing o this 1/2. The affordable housing must be 50% of th otal acreage prior to the set off. 2. The affordable housing must be plotted on 10 , 000-46 2 /afJ square foot lots. Covenants and restrictions that for each unit constructed on the M-zoned area, a unit will be constructed on the affordable housing side. Would you please review this matter with Mrs. Carroll and Mr. Bracken. The Planning Board has scheduled an appointment at the October 20 Planning Board meeting at 8 : 00 p.m. to discuss this. Would you please advise us if this is convenient for you. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD eo : Cct�vwt� By Diane M. Schultze , Secretary P Z T D SL Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Housing Committee FROM: William F. Mullen, Jr. Member DATE: May 28, 1987 RE: Costello housing project This is to advise you with regard to the status of the above mentioned affordable housing project located at Greenport. The Planning Board is making their review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) . The Draft Environmental Impact Statement has been reviewed by the Planning Consultant, David Emilita; and, his comments on the completeness of the DEIS are expected by the end of this week. Upon receipt of same, the Board will continue with the SEQRA process. The Board is in favor of the layout and will be proceeding with the site plan and subdivision applications upon completion of the SEQRA process. 1 Planning Board Page 6 9/15/86 Breakers at Lands End Mr.Hyman stated that this would be detailed on the final water and sewer plans to the Village. Mr. Orlowski stated that the drainage problem can be worked out. On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Edwards , it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site plan for "The Breakers at Lands End" located at NYS Route 25, Greenport for construction of 350 condominium units and amenities as indicated on the site plan dated December 2 , 1985 (sheets 1-25) by Steve Hyman, subject to: 1. Covenants and restrictions filed with the office of the County Clerk that the roads within this development will remain private and will not be offered for dedication and will not be under the jurisdiction of the Southold Town Highway Department. 2. Posting and acceptance by the Town Board of a performance bond in the approved amount of $100, 000 for bluff plantings for the Long Island Sound bluff stabilization and erosion control on the site. 3. Receipt of an insurance policy naming the Town as an additional insured with rgard to the unfenced ponds. 4. A one-year review by the Planning Board and inspection prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. It was noted that this project has been certified by the Building Department, and has a signed contract with the Village of Greenport forwater and sanitary sewer facilities. There. was also concern among the Board with regard to the use of ground water for the make-up water for the ponds proposed on the site. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Edwards, Wards Mr. John Costello, Mr. Donald Bracken Mrs. Diane Carroll and Mr. Charles Egosi were present to discuss the affordable houseing project at Moore ' s Lane and County Route 48, Greenport. Mr. Egosi, the architect explained the proposal to the Board. Mr. Egosi stated that 50% of the property would be used for affordable housing and the remaining 50% would be used for townhouses. Mr. Egosi had a rendering of the proposal for the Board' s review. The affordable side of the project would be two-family or semi-attached homes and the other half would have a cluster of four townhouses. Mr. Egosi stated that he had proposed a two-family dwelling to reduce the amount of roads. Mr. Egosi stated that with the lot coverage, 81% of the land would be left without construction, existing vegation of replaced vegatation. Mr. Egosi staed that a private drive-way Planning Board Page 7 9/15/86 Costello, et. al. cont. ✓ will be constructed for the townhouses. There will be 42 lots, with two units on each for the affordable houses which willl be 84 individual homes and onthe townhouses, twenty four clusters inclusters of 4. Mr. Mullen questioned if the project would be in two sections, with no ingress or egress from either one. Mr. Egosi staed that this was the way it was proposed. The townhouse side will have one driveway which will create a loop. Mr. Egosi stated that he did not proposed through traffic since he had experience in the past with this and he felt that through traffic would reduce the privacy of the community. Mr. Mullen questioned if there would be any vegetation between the two sections? Mr. Egosi stated that there would be a buffer of 80 ' between the two sections. Mr. Mullen asked if a condominium association would be used on both sections for maintenance of the open space. Mr. Egosi stated that the single family would be sold as individual residences with approximately 8500 '`- squre feet of land. The layout ❑Prm; ts a rear vardpf 70 ' ani there w' line betwe t ched aras T is will give maximum privacy to each of the semi attached 1 units. Mr. Mullen asked the maximum square footage of grog _ M, for the sinss ilv dwellings exclu� nq Mr. Egosi s si that they wound h feet. T]�e units would be slab construction. Mr. Mullen quetioned who wou -d be in c arge o emaintenance on the open space area of they were not having an association to maintain it. Mr. Egosi stated that the homeowners association will be in charge of the entire open space area. Mr. Mullen questioned the projected cost for the units. Mrs. Carrol stated that she had previously stated that they would be selling in the $75, 000 area to try to bring it in at that price. Mrs. Carroll clarified and stated that the price would be mid $70 , 000 price range. Mr. Mullen questioned the design of the homes. Mr. Egosi stated that they would be cape design with a possible extension on the second floor and the approximate upstairs area would be another 400-450 square feet. Mr. Egosi stated that there would be no service on the second floor to try to cut down on the building costs. Mrs.Carroll stated that they had not contemplated the cost of the homeowners association for each member, however, on a project which they completed in Port Jefferson it came to about $80 per home. Mr. Bracken stated that to avoid confusion, he wanted to clarify that the homeowners association would be on the Townhouse side of the project only. This association would maintainall the open space. The houses of the affordable housing side were to be sold all single and separate. Mr. Mullen asked if they could give any consideration to reducing the projected price because every little reduction helped the homeowner; Mr. Mullen stated that for $75 , 000 per house the occupants would have to earn $25 , 000 and in a study which Mr. Mullen conducted, people in the Town do not make that much. Mrs. Carrol stated that most people take 30 year mortgages and that difference in the 30 year mortgage helps out.Mr. Mullen asked if they would consider getting a construction loan. Mrs. Carrol stated that she has had experience with the banks out' here that they offer morgages based on the land and construction loan commitment. This is passed along to the people so there Planning Board Pge 8 9/15/86 Costello, et. al. cont. are savings. Mrs. Carroll stated that there would be closing costs savings to the person who used the bank. Mr. Mullen stated that this was a very good idea. Mr. Mullen stated an example with the Town of Brookhaven who had an affordable housing program and asked for $3, 000 to $4, 500 in cash at the closing. He stated that he was simply trying to save the homeowners money. Mr.Mullen stated that he would be happy if something could be looked into with regard to the mortgages with the banks. Mrs. Carroll stated that she would look into this with the local banks and was pretty sure that they would cooperate since they wanted affordable housing too. Mr. Mullen asked if Mrs. Carroll and Mr. Bracken had put up any affordable housing anywhere else. Mrs. Carroll stated that they have not put up housing in this price range before. Mr. Bracken stated that he is a contractor who has been inthe business 37 years and he has five sons who work with him in the businss. Mr. Latham asked why there was no through road. Mr. Egosi stated that in the Village of East Hampton he had designed a subdivision and everybody used the through road as a short cut making a lot of traffic on it. Mr. Latham asked for a ball park price for the townhouses. Mr. Egosi stated that they would be $130, 000 to $140, 000: Mr. Ward questioned why the layout was proposed as such when variances would be required, thus adding anouther level of approvals to obtain. Mr. Egosi stated that because the affordable housing zone had not been granted he had to do what conformed with the M zone. Mr. Ward stated that the proposal did not conform to the M zone either. Mr. Egosi stated that they could not accomplish their objectives on the property as it was currently proposed and they would have to et variances to accomplishe their objectives. Mr. Ward also questioned the second access road and why it was not provided in the plan. MR. Ward also asked if they were still considering water and sewer fromthe Village. Mr. Costello stated that presently they are negotiating withthe Village. He presented copies of the minutes from the Village Board meeting. Mr. Costello stated that Jim Monsell was to submit a letter today stating that the attorneys have to come up with a description of the roads where the utilities will be located. They will supply them with a survey for well locations . They are trying to locate the well in the buffer area so Greenport can have the well area. Mr. Costello stated that he is inthe process of obtining everything that has to be submitted to the Village, to get the contract underway. Mr. Edwards questioned if the homes would be on-site construction or manufactured homes. Mr. Bracken stated that they would be on-site construction. Mr. Orlowski asked why the affordable houses are attached. Mr. Egosi stated that this was to make better use of the land and to reduce the cost of the development. Everything will be sepearate except the connection to the sewer on the attached houses. There is 32 ' of road frontage for every unit and this is a savings versus normal residential construction. Mr. Orlowski questioned if they would be submitting a written guarantee that the units will be affordable. Mrs. Carroll stated that they would submit that, and for that size house it would be Planning Board Page 9 9/15/86 $75, 000 to $79, 000. Mrs. Carroll stated that they would submit this whenever it was asked for. Mr. Orlowski stated that they hve been over this proposal with Mr. Costello many times and everything was contingent on the providing of affordable houses. Mr. Orlowski questioned John Costello if he was still involved in the project. Mr. Costello stated that he was involved as long as it was to provide affordable housing. Mr. Costello stated that he could guarantee a price if the Board could guarantee a completion date to him. Mr. Mullen questioned if Mr. Bracken would give consideration to providing the spread sheets for the project. Mr. Bracken stated that he would not want to do this. Mr. Orlowski questioned if they would guarantee prices under $75, 000 on the affordable housing side. Mr. Bracken stated that he could not guarantee that unless he got a commitment from the Board on the plan. Mr. Egosi stated that the only way the site would bear the affordable houses would be if they had the luxury condominiums to bear some of the costs. Mr. Bracken staed that he was proposing town houses not condominiums. They would be individual homes with there own separate parcel of land. Mr. Ward stated that he would like to see an outline of how the applicants were proposing to proceed since they know what variances they will require. Mr. Ward stated that it would be very helpful if the applicants submitted an out line of what direction they were heading in since they needed other various approvals, for instance the Board of Appeals. Mr. Egosi stated that it was just a matter of interpretation and perhaps variances were not needed. Mr. Egosi requested the Board' s approval of the preliminary layout so that he could prepare the final maps and get whatever variances were required. The Board will make a field inspection prior to any further recommendations or comments. 8: 35 p.m. Planning Board Member William F. Mullen, Jr. , left the meeting at this time. Mr. Daniel Natchez was present for a presubmission conference to discuss the site plan for Brewer Yacht Yard located at Greenport. This site plan is for re-design of an existing marina. Mr. Natchez is the president of Daniel S. Natchez and Associates a water front development environmental planning company and with him was Michael Abo the general manager of Brewers yacht Yard. Mr. Natchez stated that they had proposed an amended site plan from the one which was previously approved and they were redesigning the basin. The first approval took two years to obtain with all of the agencies and therefore, the price of the first plan was now too costly to do, which is why they are proposing the change. They had alsoproposed to re-design the travel lift so that you have two lifts as opposed to one. There is also a proposed swimming pool, on of the existing buildings would be extended 50 ' x 40 ' and a new building for the transformer has been already approved. I � -� rJUNX���_ DDT oFlvjS % X02, 0 - 15 1 10 g 25 23 21 1� 17 r ve7xTioN B. - d le 07 -- 2422 20 18 16 14 6 C4jEMEnP �3 1 � - p I I _ 1111 I i { I I cS _ 28 ISI I l' 11 1 1 II , 'I Ilf(Illlfllllllllll! 49I Il 41 658 55 52 111 43� I II, .I rll �f iflgi, I I 3q7ETaz� 36 Q �dttEc-` ion 4'r2PA _ _ - 3 _ 3511 60 57 54 48 1 45 42 39 51 rla�nR srG zea rU�� �`°�R` ==s-=- Ll 1 � ul. t t t I Lnl I I 1 ��y_ At;i I II t =-__- - -._ - -_ _oaLt.�c(iss•.arz�a.s 2 EAG F 7 . t 56 53 50 47 44 - EM N L— 4 41 3 - 8 - 3 s G 59 - - RECEIVED BY J. - - 33 _ + rrlo..� { � zS;uE-4>c�1V, 1 -1of":r - ".� ►J''1; u fl • N'a�i �" sT C2 �� �a Cs {}.c2 3ea9Z. n1• Il`r6�3 c�r�/Gy