The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-40.-5-1 (2) Notes from meeting with Costello and Fishetti May 1986 Proposing a mix of moderate price housing nothing higher than 140,000 for three bedroom with the garage Mix would be 100 3 and 4 bedroom units for $100,000 each other 100 would be 1 and 2 bedroom units, mostley 2 bedroom units. it would be condo ownership, separate houses with 0 lot line 3D' apart for fire separations. Mr. Fishetti stated that he did a job in Coram with 0 lot line which were attached by storage room. single family houses on courts 50% of the houses about 75,000 - 85,000 would have to negotiate with the Village of Greenport for utilities. Would not ask for waiver on the roads but would need 2 ingress/egress or 2 tap streets would put in 200-212 units however would have to be "Multiple" because the zone change only allowed for one-acre lots. IJ '.~N' A: c~si-E1:io 206 Wiggins Lane Greenport, New York 11944 "", ... " MAR 12 1986 March 11. 198~ Re: Southold Town Hall Meeting. Friday March 14th. 3:00' p.m.. To Whom It May Concern: Since November. 1984 I have been attempting to purs~e a development on Moore's Lane to provide an opportunity for young working people in Southold Town to stay here and work for the goal of owning their own home. I am sure that there are. many interested people. especially our our public officials. that would like to see the same thing accomplished. Financially I .cannot procede on an indefinate time schedule, Presently there are several areas of decision making that have to be done ty our local governmental bodies to proceed. First of all. to get the required density I will require public water and public sewer. of which ,the Village of Greenport has control. Secondly. Southold Town presently has no zoning for detached housing on ~-acre lots (under proposed Master Plan it will be allowed under Hamlet Oensity Zoning. but I do not feel that it will be adopted as quickly as intended). Thirdly. I will need possibly a variance or waiver to develop seperate lots. Next. I will need site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. and lastly. I will need permits from the Southold Town Building Department. Again. I would like to reiterate that I cannot afford to pursue this project indefinately. If the municipal oficials want something to become of this. I am sure that the decisions will be made quickly and possibly something can be done. If not. I would like to be told so. I would appreciate your input on' Friday'March 14th at the Town Hall so that I Will know what direction I will have to pursue. incerely. ~-; . a~~~ John A. Costello JAC: 1 cw cc: Southold Town Board Greenport Village Trustees Southold Town Planning Board Village of Greenport Superintendent of Utilities Greenport Development Supervisor Southold Development Supervisor Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Board of Health cjr~J~\.v ,~ . . WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. HEFTER CHARLES R. CUDDY STEPHEN R. ANGEL ..JAMES HEFFRON ESSEKS, HEFTER, CUDDY &. ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 (516) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MONTAUK HIGHWAY P. O. Box 570 WATER MJLL, N.Y. 11976 (5t6) 726-6633 TELEX-EHCA 6852318 UW ,i;:.c;:;mD \lAR 7 ;986 March 3, 1986 .r "",,, ':1,...., 5outhoid Town Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Board Members: John Costello is the fee owner of approximately 50 acres of land on the west side of the Village of Greenport all within the Town of Southold. On December 3, 1985 the property was rezoned upon his petition to "M" Light Multiple Residence zoning status. An informational hearing was recently held concerning a proposed amendment to the Master Plan and/or the rezoning of various parcels throughout the Town. From this informational hearing it would appear that the subject parcel, which had recently been rezoned as aforesaid, is going to be rezoned to two acre residential status. This rezoning seems inappropriate. We assume it is an oversight. We call this to your attention and ask for your advice as to whether or not there is any zoning change proposed for the subject premises. We await your advice. Very truly yours, lI_v,\Yl1 William W. Esseks WWE:cf Copy: John Costello CfB'tJ\. (3 # I( - ~ . . TEL. 765-1802 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR P.O. BOX 728 TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 January 7, 1986 Mr. John A. Costello 206 Wiggins Lane Greenport, NY 11944 Dear Mr. Costello: To answer your letter of December 31, 1985, I shall first have to make you aware of the difference between a multiple residence and a one family residence. I have enclosed the section of the zoning law that defines the two. In the M-Light Multiple Residence District you are permitted to have the following uses which are subject to a site plan approval by the Planning Board. 1. One family dwellings not to exceed one dwelling on each lot. The lot size would have to be minimum 80,000 square feet and property would require subdivision approval by the Planning Board. (Sec. 100-40 A (1)). 2. Multiple dwellings, must be designed for and occupied by not more than four families in one building not to exceed 125 feet in length. (Sec. 100-40 A (2)). Your 48 acre parcel may be subdivided into 40,000 sq. ft. lots as permitted by Art. IV, Sec. 100-41 Bulk Schedule. The use shall be for a multiple dwelling and the density is subject to availability of public water and sewage. If either one are not available, then the lot size would have to be 80,000 square feet of land for a building containing four living units. To establish single dwelling units, each on a lot of 10,000 square feet under single ownership in the M-Light Multiple Residence District you will require variances under the following sections of zoning as it stands today. 1. Art. IV, Sec. 100-40 A (1), this section permits single family residence as regulated by Sec. 100-30 A. 2. Art. III, Sec. 100-31, Bulk Schedule, this section sets lot size requirements for the one family residence under Art. III. tf6H \-l-~ r:sv.€,y . . . ,. Mr. John A. Costello January 7, 1986 Page 2 In the developement of a site for multiple residence use the density would be calculated on the square foot area of the parcel being developed. Unlike a subdivision for single family residence where each lot is held in single and separate ownership, the roads, in this case driveways, are not disallowed in computing density requirements. Keep in mind this type of developement is in single ownership. If you were developing under a condominium concept the land would be in common ownership. I am including copies of zoning that apply to your proposed develope- mente Trusting this to be of some help to you in developing your plans. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, ~~~ Edward F. Hindermann Building & Housing Inspector EFH:ec Enclosures xc: Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board./ '---=-: .- ~, .. . . ~ ~t1/ TEL. 765-1802 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR P.O. BOX 728 TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 January 7, 1986 Mr. John A. Costello 206 Wiggins Lane Greenport, NY 11944 Dear Mr. Costello: To answer your letter of December 31, 1985, I shall first have to make you aware of the difference between a multiple residence and a one family residence. I have enclosed the section of the zoning law that defines the two. . In the M-Light Multiple Residence District you are permitted to have the following uses which are subject to a site plan approval by the Planning Board. 1. One family dwellings not to exceed one dwelling on each lot. The lot size would have to be minimum 80,000 square feet and property would require subdivision approval by the Planning Board. (Sec. 100-40 A (1)). 2. Multiple dwellings, must be designed for and occupied by not more than four families in one building not to exceed 125 feet in length. (Sec. 100-40 A (2)). Your 48 acre parcel may be subdivided into 40,000 sq. ft. lots as permitted by Art. IV, Sec. 100-41 Bulk Schedule. The use shall be for a multiple dwelling and the density is subject to availability of public water and sewage. If either one are not available, ,then the lot size would have to be 80,000 square feet of land for a building containing four living units. To establish single dwelling units, each on a lot of 10,000 square feet under single ownership in the M-Light Multiple Residence District you will require variances under the following sections of zoning as it stands today. 1. Art. IV, Sec. 100-40 A (1), this section permits single family residence as regulated by Sec. 100-30 A. 2. Art. III, Sec. 100-31, Bulk Schedule, this section sets lot size requirements for the one family residence under Art. III. . . . . Mr. John A. Costello January 7, 1986 Page 2 In the developement of a site for multiple residence use the density would be calculated on the square foot area of the parcel being developed. Unlike a subdivision for single family residence where each lot is held in single and separate ownership, the roads, in this case driveways, are not disallowed in computing density requirements. Keep in mind this type of developement is in single ownership. If you were developing under a condominium concept the land would be in common ownership. ment. I am including copies of zoning that apply to your proposed develope- Trusting this to be of some help to you in developing your plans. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, .. Edward F. Hindermann Building & Housing Inspector EFH:ec Enclosures xc: Zoning Board of Appeals Planning Board ,.. .HN A. COSTEllO 206 Wiggins Lane Greenport. New Yark 11944 . :) ecember '31, 1985 JAN 3 f'?!sW } II1r. Edward F. Hiniernann, Ch,irnan 'I'Own of SouthaLl Building I) eFartment Southold Town Hall "Ia in Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 I)ear \1r. Hinderna nn: I h<.1ve reeellLly reyue:oLeu <.1 chanye ot zone on a forty-eight acre parcel of land, located on Route 48 and \1oore's Lane in the unincorporated Village of Sreenport, from A-qesi'lential/l\'jricultural to :\i-Light Multiple Resiiential. I have recieved this zone change. I would 1 ike to ascertain, if under \1-Lig ht zoning, it is possible to have four separate and distinct dwelling units within a forty-thousand square foot area or do the units have to be attached and conform to the maximum one-hundred-twenty-five foot building length as described in 100-40 A2? I am asking this question under the presulnption that I will be granted public water and sewer. What are the basic steps required to proceed with a development allowing one detached unit on each ten- thousand square feet of land? I am aware that site plan approval is necessary and in the new proposed MPster Plan HD allows for the detached housing. Under present zoning, how do I proceed in obtaining the necessary approvals? Lastly, I would like to know if the density on the property is calculated on the total area divided by forty-thousand or is there a discounted allowance for roads and drainage discharge under '-I-Light Residential zoning? Any assistance you can give me in questions will be greatly appreciated. advance for your help in this matter. answering these Thank you in Very trul y your s, JAC:el cc: B. Orlowski / G. 30ehringer ~'(~I '-" ",..: ,,~ /. , ' . ~ "( ...~......", /.... , <.... ~ :'{ ~ . John A. Costello . .' /1 ,. C:{\JrJ/"\ r 5'60 . . . Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 3, 1985 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Costello Rezoning DEIS Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, December 2, 1985. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accepts the report of David Emilita dated November 25,1985 and forwards these comments to the Town Board to go on record with regard to the Costello Rezoning DEIS. Attached is a copy of that report for your review If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, ~f1..1li,tt Qrlo..u~ tti., ~ clYLQ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M.Schultze, Secretary attachment cc: Town Board Town Attorney , . ~~ P'J(A~NING:B(}ARD >:I. ~. '" .. fff....'iJ7.. :: ..~.-:;;;\ '" ,,,1 ;"';::',.t:'i}:'~:-:~,( -.( ~ TOW1N o SOU HOLD s\:;~Ni~fut~y ~.4'" "o"'^ "if.,!, :~~ ;\, ' :rrf. . Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 The Planning Board wishes to go on record with regard to the C~st~llo Rezoning DEIS. The DEIS is basically very similar to the one prepared for the former annexation effort and so much of its content has been reviewed and commented on previously. This project, however, has potentially significant and different impacts from the annexation and these need to be addressed. These are as follows: 1) "M" Zone vs "RD" District The "M" Zone will not entirely accomplish the applicants stated desire, that is to produce affordable single family lots. Nor will it in itself accomplish affordable housing of any kind. It is thus recommended that the "HD" District be applied to this site as soon as feasible. In the interim, covenants and restrictions should be utilized or a rezoning conditioned on the provision of affordable housing as defined by the Town. 2) Impact on on-site-well It has not been clearly demonstrated what effect that 180 dwellings on 48 acres will have on an on-site well in terms of recharge quality. Input from the Village water system and the County Health Department would seem necessary in this regard. Existing water quality in the test well is acceptable, but there will be a loss of recharge due to consumptive use and wastewater collection, and there will be an introduction of lawn fertilizers and other household contaminants into the recharged groundwater. The impact on groundwater, (and the on-site well) has not been stated. Input from the Village of Greenport's water system and from the Suffolk County Department of Health would also seem necessary in the event that one or both public utilities would prove to be unavailable. ( A letter from the Health Department on the annexation alternative is included in this DEIS. We ~on't feel this is acceptable as a review of this project under SEQR.) In conclusion, we agree with the stated merits of the rezoning proposed, but some conditions need to be placed on it to assure the Town that the stated purpose will be achieved. DE/jmb s C.1i~~ De--PoNb FLU;::. COPY FOR YOUR INfORMATION T R~CEIVEO SEP 1 7 1985 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 September 17, 1985 Town Clerk Southord Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 RE: Change of Zone John Costello Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, September 16, 1985. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board that the change of zone application of. John Costello from "A" Agricultural and Reaidential to "M" Light Multiple, located at Greenport, be approved. It is the Planning Board's intent, in endorsing the M, Light- Multiple zone, to obtain affordable housing. Therefore, the Board also recommends that any approval be conditioned upon obtaining approved covenants and restrictions to parallel the . "Hamlet Density" zone in the proposed zoning ordinance to provide for affordable housing. , fJ~.erp J)&~ )/77 .~ 7~. fi?;;.>t:-. ~ ..c/ ?,,>://"? L/ ~ Very truly yours, ~'Dt~~h_~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., ch~IRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD CdU~I.Jf~J7?'" q-- GY"L..4.{}TC-b,5, By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary ~;/ /-::r- -?/~ ~ OS .-~ '--....,.- . . JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Dated: December 3, 1985 .. Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Board, as lead agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Petition of John A. Costello for a Change of Zone from "A" Residential and Agri- cultural District to "1'11" Light Multiple Residence District on certain property located at Greenport, Town of Southold, at the southeast corner of the intersection of Moores Lane and County Route 48. The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environ- ment because a Draft Environmental Impact Statement has been filed and circulated and there have been no comments in the allotted time, and because this Draft Environ- mental Impact Statement indicated that no significant adverse effect to the environment are likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. Further information may be obtained by contacting Mrs. Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Copies to: Charles Hamilton, DEC, Stony Brook Commissioner Williams, DEC, Albany Town Board Members Southold Town Planning BoardV Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Department of Health Services Town Clerk's Bulletin Board . . S41 SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS S41 TO: RE: FROM: DATE: Southold Planning Board Costello Rezoning DEIS David Emilita 11/25/85 The Planning Board should go on record with regard to the Costello Rezoning DEIS. The DEIS is basically very similar to the one prepared for the former annexation effort and so much of its content has been reviewed and commented on previously. This project, however, has potentially significant and different impacts from the annexation and these need to be addressed. These are as follows: 1) wMw Zone vs wHOw District The wMw Zone will not entirely accomplish the applicants stated desire, that is to produce affordable single family lots. Nor will it in itself accomplish affordable housing of any kind. It is thus recommended that the wHOw District be applied to this site as soon as feasible. In the interim, covenants and restrictions should be utilized or a rezoning conditioned on the provision of affordable housing as defined by the Town. 2) Impact on on-site-well It has not been clearly demonstrated what effect that 180 dwellings on 48 acres will have on an on-site well in terms of recharge quality. Input from the Village water system and the County Health Department would seem necessary in this regard. Existing water quality in the test well is acceptable, but there will be a loss of recharge due to consumptive use and wastewater collection, and there will be an introduction of lawn fertilizers and other household contaminants into the recharged groundwater. The impact on groundwater, (and the on-site well) has not been stated. Input from the Village of Greenport's water system and from the Suffolk County Department of Health would also seem necessary in the event that one or both public utilities would prove to be unavailable. ( A letter from the Health Department on the annexation alternative is included in this DEIS. We don't feel this is acceptable as a review of this project under SEQR.) In conclusion, we agree with the stated merits of the rezoning proposed, but some conditions need to be placed on it to assure the Town that the stated purpose will be achieved. DE/jmb 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown. RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 . . S41 SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS S41 TO: RE: FROM: DATE: Southold Planning Board Costello Rezo~g DEIS David Emilita\.YL... 11/25/85 The Planning Board should go on record with regard to the Costello Rezoning DEIS. The DEIS is basically very similar to the one prepared for the former annexation effort and so much of its content has been reviewed and commented on previously. This project, however, has potentially significant and different impacts from the annexation and these need to be addressed. These are as follows: 1) nMn Zone vs "RD" District The "M" Zone will not entirely accomplish the applicants stated desire, that is to produce affordable single family lots. Nor will it in itself accomplish affordable housing of any kind. It is thus recommended that the nHD" District be applied to this site as soon as feasible. In the interim, covenants and restrictions should be utilized or a rezoning conditioned on the provision of affordable housing as defined by the Town. 2) Impact on on-site-well It has not been clearly demonstrated what effect that 180 dwellings on 48 acres will have on an on-site well in terms of recharge quality. Input from the Village water system and the County Health Department would seem necessary in this regard. Existing water quality in the test well is acceptable, but there will be a loss of recharge due to consumptive use and wastewater collection, and there will be an introduction of lawn fertilizers and other household contaminants into the recharged groundwater. The impact on groundwater, (and the on-site well) has not been stated. Input from the Village of Greenport's water system and from the Suffolk County Department of Health would also seem necessary in the event that one or both public utilities would prove to be unavailable. ( A letter from the Health Department on the annexation alternative is included in this DEIS. We don't feel this is acceptable as a review of this project under SEQR.) In conclusion, we agree with the stated merits of the rezoning proposed, but some conditions need to be placed on it to assure the Town that the stated purpose will be achieved. DE/jmb 23 Narral!;ansett Ave. Jamestown. RI 02.835 (401) 423-0430 . . S41 SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS S41 TO: RE: FROM: DATE: Southold Planning Board Costello Rezo~g DEIS David Emilita\.Y.l- 11/25/85 The Planning Board should go on record with regard to the Costello Rezoning DEIS. The DEIS is basically very similar to the one prepared for the former annexation effort and so much of its content has been reviewed and commented on previously. This project, however, has potentially significant and different impacts from the annexation and these need to be addressed. These are as follows: 1) "M" Zone vs "RD" District The "M" Zone will not entirely accomplish the applicants stated desire, that is to produce affordable single family lots. Nor will it in itself accomplish affordable housing of any kind. It is thus recommended that the "HD" District be applied to this site as soon as feasible. In the interim, covenants and restrictions should be utilized or a rezoning conditioned on the provision of affordable housing as defined by the Town. 2) Impact on on-site-well It has not been clearly demonstrated what effect that 180 dwellings on 48 acres will have on an on-site well in terms of recharge quality. Input from the Village water system and the County Health Department would seem necessary in this regard. Existing water quality in the test well is acceptable, but there will be a loss of recharge due to consumptive use and wastewater collection, and there will be an introduction of lawn fertilizers and other household contaminants into the recharged groundwater. The impact on groundwater, (and the on-site well) has not been stated. Input from the Village of Greenport's water system and from the Suffolk County Department of Health would also seem necessary in the event that one or both public utilities would prove to be unavailable. ( A letter from the Health Department on the annexation alternative is included in this DEIS. We don't feel this is acceptable as a review of this project under SEQR.) In conclusion, we agree with the stated merits of the rezoning proposed, but some conditions need to be placed on it to assure the Town that the stated purpose will be achieved. DE/jrnb 23 Narragansett Ave. lamestown. RI 01835 (401) 413-0430 . . S41 SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS S41 TO: RE: FROM: DATE: Southold Planning Board Costello Rezo~g DEIS David Emilita\.Y.l- 11/25/85 The Planning Board should go on record with regard to the Costello Rezoning DEIS. The DEIS is basically very similar to the one prepared for the former annexation effort and so much of its content has been reviewed and commented on previously. This project, however, has potentially significant and different impacts from the annexation and these need to be addressed. These are as follows: 1) "M" Zone vs "HO" District The "M" Zone will not entirely accomplish the applicants stated desire, that is to produce affordable single family lots. Nor will it in itself accomplish affordable housing of any kind. It is thus recommended that the "HD" District be applied to this site as soon as feasible. In the interim, covenants and restrictions should be utilized or a rezoning conditioned on the provision of affordable housing as defined by the Town. 2) Impact on on-site~well It has not been clearly demonstrated what effect that 180 dwellings on 48 acres will have on an on-site well in terms of recharge quality. Input from the Village water system and the County Health Department would seem necessary in this regard. Existing water quality in the test well is acceptable, but there will be a loss of recharge due to consumptive use and wastewater collection, and there will be an introduction of lawn fertilizers and other household contaminants into the recharged groundwater. The impact on groundwater, (and the on-site well) has not been stated. Input from the Village of Greenport's water system and from the Suffolk County Department of Health would also seem necessary in the event that one or both public utilities would prove to be unavailable. ( A letter from the Health Department on the annexation alternative is included in this DEIS... We don't feel this is acceptable as a .review of this project under SEQR.) In conclusion, we agree with the stated merits of the rezoning proposed, but some conditions need to be placed on it to assure the Town that the stated purpose will be achieved. DE/jmb 23 Narragansett Ave: Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 . . S41 SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS S41 TO: RE: FROM: DATE: Southold Planning Board Costello Rezo~g DEIS David Emilita'-.SV.- 11/25/85 The Planning Board should go on record with regard to the Costello Rezoning DEIS. The DEIS is basically very similar to the one prepared for the former annexation effort and so much of its content has been reviewed and commented on previously. This project, however, has potentially significant and different impacts from the annexation and these need to be addressed. These are as follows: 1) "M. Zone vs .RD. District The "M. Zone will not entirely accomplish the applicants stated desire, that is to produce affordable single family lots. Nor will it in itself accomplish affordable housing of any kind. It is thus recommended that the .HD. District be applied to this site as soon as feasible. In the interim, covenants and restrictions should be utilized or a rezoning conditioned on the provision of affordable housing as defined by the Town. 2) Impact on on-site-well It has not been clearly demonstrated what effect that 180 dwellings on 48 acres will have on an on-site well in terms of recharge quality. Input from the Village water system and the County Health Department would seem necessary in this regard. Existing water quality in the test well is acceptable, but there will be a loss of recharge due to consumptive use and wastewater collection, and there will be an introduction of lawn fertilizers and other household contaminants into the recharged groundwater. The impact on groundwater, (and the on-site well) has not been stated. Input from the Village of Greenport's water system and from the Suffolk County Department of Health would also seem necessary in the event that one or both public utilities would prove to be unavailable. ( A letter from the Health Department on the annexation alternative is included in this DEIS. We don't feel this is acceptable as a review of this project under SEQR.) In conclusion, we agree with the stated merits of the rezoning proposed, but some conditions need to be placed on it to assure the Town that the stated purpose will be achieved. DE/jmb 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 t . . -Td4N A. C05r~ Left; ( Introduction ( The following checklist of topics is intended as a starting point for developing a detailed scope for a project-specific Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Typically, no one project will require a discussion of all the topic areas contained in this document. Through the scoping process, this list of topics should be refined to reflect issues unique to the proposed project. Topic areas may be deleted, added, or elaborated upon, to arrive at the final scoping document. The purpose of the checklist format is to identify the basic topic areas for the Draft EIS. This is accomplished by reviewing the list and placing a check in the box located to the left of those topics which should be discussed. The model scoping checklist can also be used as a worksheet, including comments, suggestions and identification of the particular example(s) that are relevant to a detailed discussion of the topic or issue that has been check- ed. Conversely, those topics which are not checked, are issues not associated with the project, and may be eliminated from discussion in the Draft EIS. Minimum requirements for any Draft EIS are already checked for convenience. The next step is to expand the list to include or elaborate on those topics unique to the proposed project. A blank sheet is included at the end of the checklist for such additional information. The scoping process involves several steps in addition to compiling a list of topics. Scoping also includes discussiors on the quantity and quality of information required and the methods for obtaining that data. ( NOTE: This checklist was designed to be used in conjunction with the section on scoping con- tained in the SEQR Guideline-Draft and Final EIS's. It is also important to emphasize that this checklist should serve only as a model to assist in the scoping of a Draft EIS. It should not be used as a substitute for actively scoping a Draft EIS for a specific pro- ject. I. Cover Sheet All EIS's (Draft or Final) shall begin with a cover sheet that indicates: A. Whether it is a draft or final statement B. Name or other descriptive title of the project C. Location (county and town, village or city) of the project D. Name and address of the lead agency which II!J required preparation of the statement and the name and telephone number of a person at the agency to be contacted for further in. formation E. Name and address of the preparers of any portion of the statement and a contact name and telephone number F. Date of acceptance of the Draft EIS G. In the case of a Draft EIS, the deadline date by which comments are due should be in- dicated II. Table of Contents and Summary . A table of contents and a brief summary are re- ~U1red for Draft and Final EIS's exceeding 10 pages In length. However, one should include these features in any size EIS to provide the review agency with easy reference to EIS topics_ . The summary should include: SeA. Brief description of the action B. Significant, beneficial and adverse impacts (issues of controversy must be specified) , C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternatives considered E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals, funding) III. Description of the Proposed Action Place a check in the box to the left of those topics to be included in the draft EIS. o A. PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED V" 1. Background and history V" 2. Public need for the project, and municipality objectives based on adopted community development plans -- 3. Objectives of the project sponsor o B. LOCATION Ed.- f- 1. Establish geographic boundaries of the 't:>{ \ project (use of regional and local scale maps is recommended) 2. Description of access to site 3. Description of existing zoning of propos. ed site. 4. Other: . o C. DESIGN AND LA YOUT (;Jt(,~ V 1. Total site area ' ro l4 a.) proposed impervio surface (roofs, parking lots, roa b.) amount of land to be cleared c.) open space 2. Structures a.) gross leaseable area (GLA), if ap- plicable, b.) layout of buildings (attached, enclos- ed, separate) c.) site plans and profile views 3. Parking a.) pavement area b.) number of spaces and layout 4. Other: o D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION 7'< 1. Construction a.) total construction period anticipated b.) schedule of construction c.) future potential development, on site or on adjoining properties d.) other: 2. Operation a.) type of operation b.) schedule of operation c.) other: D. 1:.. CLOSURE AND POST CLOSURE PLANS ~. (for projects of planned limited life such as landfills) o F. APPROVALS 16.J 1. Required changes or variances to the zon. SLofl..B ing regulations T f'B~' Other permit approval or funding re- quirements 1)..,. "l L f-L~. ~M<)<'- IV. Environmental Setting ~ew{\k eJ~ Plac In e box to the left of those topics to be included in the Draft EIS. ( \ Natural Resources o A. GEOLOGY o 1. Subsurface a.) composition and thickness of subsurface material examples: -depth to, and nature of, bed- rock formations and imperme- able layers -occurrence of an extractive mineral resource -usefulness as construction material b.) earthquake potential o 2. Surface a.) list of soil types b.) discussion of soil characteristics examples: -physical properties (indication of soils hydrological (infiltra. tion) capabilities) -engineering properties (soil bearing capacity) c.) distribution of soil types at pro- ject site d.) suitability for use examples: -agriculture -recreation -construction -mining e.) other: o 3. Topography a.) description of topography at pro. ject site examples: -slopes -prominent or unique features b.) description of topography of sur- rounding area o B. WATER RESOURCES o 1. Groundwater a.) location and description of aquifers and recharge areas examples: -depth to water table -seasonal variation -quality -quantity -flow {: ( C-2 l . . ( ( b.) identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater examples: -location of existin!'j wells -public/private water supply -industrial uses -agricultural uses o 2. Surface water a.) location and description of sur. face waters located on project site or those that may be in- fluenced by the project examples: -seasonal variation -quality -classification according to New York State Department of Health b.) identification of uses and level of use of all surface waters examples: -public/private water supply -industrial uses -agricultural uses -recreation c.) description of existing drainage areas, patterns and channels d.) discussion of potential for flooding, siltation, erosion and eutrophication of water sources o C. AIR RESOURCES o 1. Climate a.) discussion of seasonal variations and extremes examples: -temperature -humidity -precipitation -wind ( o 2. Air quality a.) description of existing air quality levels examples: -list the National and State Air Quality Standards for the pro- ject area and the compliance status for each standard b.) identification of existing sources or pollutants. fixed or mobile . c.) identification of any sensitive receptors in project area examples: -hospitals, schools, nursing homes, parks d.) description of existing monitor- ing program (if applicable) o D. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY o 1. Vegetation . a.) list vegetation types on the pro. ject site and within the surround. ing area b.) discussion of site vegetation characteristics examples: -species present and abundance -age -size -distribution -dominance -community types -unique, rare and endangered species -value as habitat for wildlife -productivity o 2. Fish and Wildlife a.) list of fish and wildlife species on the project site and within sur. rounding area, including migratory and resident species b.) discussion of fish and wildlife population characteristics examples: -species present and abundance -distribution -dominance -unique, rare and endangered sped es . -productivity o 3. Wetlands a.) list wetland areas within or con- tiguous to the project site b.) discuss wetland characteristics examples: -acreage -vegetative cover -classification -benefits of wetland such as flood and erosion control, recreation C.3 . . , Human Resources . o A. TRANSPORTATION o 1. Transportation services a.) description of the size, capacity and condition of services examples: -roads, canals, railroads, bridges -parking facilities -traffic control b.) description of current level of use of services examples: -a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic flow -vehicle mix -sources of existing traffic volume o 2. Public transportation a.) description of the current availability of service b.) description of present level of use o 3. Pedestrian environment o 4. Other: o B. LAND USE AND ZONING o 1. Existing land use and zoning a.) description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area examples: .,-commercial -residential -agricultural -business -retail -industrial -vacant b.) description of the existing zoning of site and surrounding area Land use plans a.) description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area b.) discussion of future development trends or pressures ,,~,fk 2. o 3. Other: ( o C. COMMUNITY SERVICES (for this section in- clude a list of existing facilities and a discus. sion of existing levels of usage and pro. jected future needs) Sa..L 0 1. Educational facilities ~,~D 2. Police protection ~ 0 3. Fire protection " 0 4. Health care facilities " 0 5. Social services . - 0 6. Recreational facilities D,~ U 8. Other: 'I<W \6\J - ~Ol:lt ll; 0 27 () () I ( ,?>I/OL o D. DEMOGRAPHY o 1. Population characteristics I>ew(, 1 ~ a.) discussion of the existing popula. ).: . It' tion parameters --r: examples: ( I ~ -distribution ~ -density -household size and composi- tion b.) discussion of projections for population growth o 2. Other: o E. CULTURAL RESOURCES o 1. Visual resources a.) description of the physical C:kw; character of the community example: D" -urban vs. rural n'vi._....CS -oov" b.) description of natural areas of significant scenic value c.) identification of structures of significant architectural design o 2. Historic and archaeological resources a.) location and description of historic areas or structures listed on State or National Register or designated by the community b.) identification of sites having ~ potential significant ar- chaeological value I I C-4 (\ . . Q.e~tM toRO es-'ts ( L . 1\' Noise a.) identification of existing level of noise in the community b. identification of major sources of noise examples: -airports -major highways - industrial/commercial facili- ties (jI\ \0 4. Other: V. Significant Environmental Impacts Identify those aspects of the environmental set- ting in Section IV that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed, ction and re- 1~e~.n._~t ~ (-faX) VI. Mitigatior/M~%ft~~ 1m ze nvironmen- tal Impact Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Section V. The follow- ing is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major areas of impact. Natural Resources 4s W( ~<;Q..I0 o A. GEOLOGY -l- .5.. t!.. 1. Subsurface a.) use excavated material for land reclamation b.) use facility wastes (ash, sludge) for land reclamation co) other: 2. Surface a;) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration and landscaping b.) minimize disturbance of non- construction sites c.) design and implement soil ero- sion control plan d.) other: 3. Topography a.) avoid construction on areas of steep slope b.) design adequate soil erosion devices to protect areas of steep slope c.) other: . o B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a.) design adequate system of treat. 01) ~Sl '.1_ ment for stormwater runoff prior ~ to recharge of groundwater b.) maintain permeable areas on the site c.) institute a program for monitor- ing water quality in adjacent wells d.) other: 2. Surface water a.) ensure use of soil erosion control techniques during construction and operation to avoid siltation examples: -hay bales -temporary restoration of vegetation to disturbed areas -landscaping b.) design adequate stormwater con- . trol system c.) restrict use of salt or sand for road and parking area snow removal d.) avoid direct discharges to surface water resources e.) other: o C. AIR RESOURCES 1. Air quality a.) assure proper construction prac. tices examples: -fugitive dust control -proper operation and maintenance of construction equipment b.) design traffic improvements to reduce congestion and vehicle delay c.) install and ensure the proper operation of emission control devices d.) initiate a program for monitoring of air quality e.) other: C-5 . . . o D. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation a.) restrict clearing to only those areas necessary b.) preserve part of site as a natural area . c.) after construction, landscape site with naturally occurring vegeta. tion d.) purchase open space at another location and dedicate to local government or conservation organization e.) other: 2. Fish and Wildlife a.) provide adequate habitat (shelter and food) for remaining wildlife species b.) schedule construction to avoid sensitive periods of fish and wildlife life cycles c.) other: Human Resources o A. TRANSPORTATION 1. Transportation services a.) design adequate and safe access to project site to handle pro. jected traffic flow b.) install adequate traffic control devices c.) optimize use of parking areas d.) encourage car pooling and opera- tion of facility during non.peak traffic times e.) design special routing and restricted hours for delivery truck traffic f.) other: 2. Public transportation a.) adjust public transportation routes and schedules to service the facility b.) encourage use of public transpor- tation by using incentive pro- grams for employees or by sell- ing tickets in facility c.) other: ( o B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Existing land use and zoning a.) design project to comply with ex. isting land use plans b.) design functional and visually ap- pealing facility to set standard and precedent for future surrounding land use c.)other: o C. COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Police protection a.) minimize local police protection responsibilities by providing private security force b.) provide security systems, alarms for facility c.) provide equipment. funds or ser- vices directly to the community ." I d.) other: 2. Fire protection a.) use construction materials that minimize fire hazards b.) incorporate sprinkler and alarm systems into building design c.) provide equipment. funds or ser- vices directly to the community d.) other: 3. Utilities a.) install utility services undergrotmd b.) incorporate water saving fixtures into facility design c.) incorporate energy-saving measures into facility design d.) other: o D. CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources a.) design exterior of structure to physically blend with existing surroundings b.) minimize visual impact through thoughtful and innovative design of lighting and signs (consider: height, size, intensity, glare and hours of lighting operation) c.) design landscaping to be visually pleasing and to serve as a buffer between surrounding land uses, parking areas, operational equip- ment and facilities d.) other: ( E (,6 . , . ( ( 2. Historic and archaeologic resources a.)allow historical and ar. chaeological officials access to the project site during excavation b.) devote space within project site to a display of historical and ar. chaeological artifacts of local in. terest c.) preserve architecturally signifi. cant structures and make a photographic and statistical record of those that must be destroyed d.) other: 3. Noise a.) schedule construction/operation to occur during "normal business" hours minimizing noise impact during sensitive times (early morning, night) b.) assure adherence to construction noise standards c.) design berms and landscaping to block and absorb noise d.) other: VII. Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot be Avoided if the Project is Implemented Identify those adverse environmental effects in Section V that can be expected to occur regardless of the mitigation measures considered in Section VI. l VllI. Alternatives This section contains categories of alternatives with examples. Discussion of each alternative should be at a level sufficient to permit a com. parative assessment of costs, benefits and en- vironmental risks for each alternative. It is not ac. ceptable to make simple assertions that a particular alternative is or is not feasible. Identify those categories of alternatives which should be included in the EIS by placing a check in the box located to the left of the topic. o A. ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES 1. Site layout a.) density and location of structures b.) location of access routes, park- ing and utility routes 2. Orientation a.) compatibility with slope and drainage patterns b.) site size and setback re- quirements 3. Technology a.) pollution control equipment b.) innovative vs. proven technologies 4. Mix of activities a.) addition of businesses which would affect the operational nature of the facility . DESIGN AND o B. ALTERNATIVE SITES 1. Limiting factors a.) availability of land b.) suitability of alternate site to ac. comodate design requirements c.) availability of utilities d.) suitable market area e.) compatibility with local zoning and master plan f.) compatibility with regional ob. jectives g.) accessibility of site to Vansporta. tion routes and the service population o c. ALTERNATIVE SIZE 1. Increase or decrease project size to minimize possible impacts 2. Increase or decrease project size to correspond to market and com. munity needs o D. ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION/OPERA- . TION SCHEDULING 1. Commence construction at a dif- ferent time 2. Phase construction/operation 3. Restrict construction/operation work schedule C-7 . . ,. o E. ALTERNATIVE LAND USE 1. Suitability of site for other uses a.) other types of commercial uses . b.) other types of industry c.) different types of housing d.) other: 2. Public vs. private use o F. NO ACTION 1. Impacts of no action a.) effect on public need b.) effect on private developers'need c.) beneficial or adverse en. vironmental impacts o G. OTHER: ~)<l~ -r IX. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section IV that will be consumed, converted or made unavailable for future use. X. Growth Inducing Aspects Describe in this section the potential growth aspects the proposed project may have. Listed below are examples of topics that are typically af. fected by the growth induced by a project. o A. POPULATION 1. Increases in business and resident population due to the creation or relocation of business 2. Increases in resident population due to the construction of housing o B. SUPPORT FACILITIES 1. Businesses created to serve the in. creased population 2. Service industries created to supply new facility o C. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 1. Introduction or improvement of in. frastructure (roads, waste disposal, sewers, water) to service proposed project 2. Creation of further growth potential by construction of improved in- frastructure o D. OTHER: ( XI. Effects on the Use and Conservation of Energy Resources Identify the energy sources to be used, an. ticipated levels of consumption and ways to reduce energy consumption. The examples listed below are typical issues to be considered when addressing this topic. o A. PROPOSED ENERGY SOURCES AND ALTERNATIVES o B. ANTICIPATED SHORT-TERMlLONG.TERM LEVELS OF I;:NERGY CONSUMPTION o C. INDIRECT EFFECTS ON ENERGY CON. SUMPTION 1. Increased dependence on automobile use 2. Increased levels of traffic due to pro. posed project o D. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES 1. Design methods to reduce fuel use for heating, cooling, and lighting a.) conventional technology examples: -insulation -thermopane windows -use of low wattage lights b.) innovative technology examples: -heat pumps -solar panels -:;wind energy -use of waste heat from an in. dustrial plant c.) efficient layout examples: -orientation of structures in relation to summer and winter sunlight -clustering of structures to maximize common walls -shortening of utility runs -shared insulation and heating 2. Indirect energy benefits a.) location and design of facility to accomodate mass transit b.) use of shuttle buses c.) location of facility to minimize travel distance ( E o E. OTHER: C.8 , .. . ( ( c . . XII. Appendices Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the EIS. A. List of underlying studies, reports and infor. mation considered and relied on in preparing state. ment B. List all federal, state, regional, or local agen. cies, organizations, consultants and private persons consulted in preparing the statement C. Technical exhibits (if any) at a legible scale D. Relevant correspondence regarding the pro. jects may be included (required in the Final EIS) Additional Draft EIS Scoplng Topics Indicate any additional topics for discussion in the Draft EIS. Attach additional sheets if necessary. ~UNTY OF SUFFOLK · ~ ~ ~~l fOR YOUR ~\W'i'\'W~ Iti\1 ul...dHii..:\''i ~~~ f2/~CI.6f~c{ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE FILED TOWN ClEqK'S OFFICE LEE E. KOPPELMAN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING '85 OCT 23 Al1 II II October 22, 1985 RiVE RH EAD, NEW YORK Mr. William W, Esseks 108 East Main Street P ,0. Box 279 Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 Re: Application of "John A. Costello" for a change of zone from "A" Agricultural and Residential to ''M'" Multiple Residence, Town of Southold (SD-85-l5). Dear Mr. Esseks: In response to your letter of October 18, 1985 relative to the above referenced and the conditional approval set forth by the Suffolk County Plan- ning Commission on October 2, 1985, please be advised that phraseology in the Commission determination permits discretionary criterion as established by the Town of Southold. A source for such affordable housing and related criteria is Chapter 9 of the Southampton Town Code. Very truly yours, RECEIVED Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning :.,J~';t Chief Planner OCT 2 41985 Town Cl"rk Southold GGN:jk Encl.: (1) Chapter 9 cc: Town Clerk ./ ~ ~ \,ch 0.,\ \V \ O~ VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, L.l.. NEW YORK 11788 IS18) 380-51 112 ~ . .. . EP 26 \986 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Dated: SeptEmber 24, 1985 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, does hereby detennine that the action described below is a Type I action and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Petition of John A. Costello for a change of zone fran "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District on certain property located on the corner of Route 48 and Moores Lane, Greenport, New York. Further infonnation may be obtained by contacting Mrs. Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Copies to: Charles T. Hamilton, DEC, Stony Brook Comnissioner Williams, DEC, Albany Southold Town Planning Board------- Southold Town Building Department Suffolk County Department of Health Services Town Clerk's Bulletin Board John A. Costello ~rl.D\fS 6'P .. . . JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS 'TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS AOOPTED BY THE SOurnOill 'TOWN OOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HEI.D ON SEPTEMBER 24, 1985: WHEREAS, John A. Costello has heretofore su1:mitted a petition to the Southold Town Board for a Change of Zone fran "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District on certain property located on the corner of Route 48 and Moores Lane, Greenport, New York, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conserva- tion Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, does hereby detennine that the action proposed is a Type I action and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Town Clerk shall file and circulate such determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. 3. That the Town Clerk inmediately notify the applicant, John A. Costello, of this detennination, all in accordance with said law, rules and code. And, whereas, previous application has been made to this Board by said applicant for the same land for annexation to the Village of Greenport, in which proceeding this Board required that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement be prepared, which was prepared and filed by the applicant in said proceeding. And, whereas, the previous Draft Environmental Impact Statement, with respect to the annexation proceeding, Embraced many of the matters which would be contained in a Draft Environmental Impact Statement with respect to the present change of zone application, it is detennined by the Town Board that the applicant shall be required to submit the previous Draft Environmental Impact Statement as to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement in this proceeding, provided, however, that the same be nxxIified and/or added to by an addendum to address such issues as are detennined in a Scoping Session to be held by the applicant with the Town I s planning consultant David Emilita. r:l'.~d~~~ ~~ith T. Terry (/ Southold Town Clerk. i \ i: 0 ~~:()~~ if\)' " , , LEGAL NOTICE ~ NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSAL TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing will be held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., on the 29th day of October, 1985, on the proposal of John A. Costello to amend the Building Zone Ordiannce (including the Building Zone Maps) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, by changing from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District all that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the easterly line of Moore's Lane with the southerly line of Middle Road (County Road li8), said point being the northwesterly corner of the premises herein described; running thence along said southerly line of Middle Road three courses: (1) Nortll 66 degrees, 09 minutes, 10 seconds East 96.61 feet; thence (2) North 69 degrees, i i 02 minutes, 10 seconds East 985.10 feet; thence (3) North 71 degrees 28 I minutes 20 seconds East 312.6li feet to the westerly line of a subdivision known: I as "Fleetfield"; thence along said westerly line of "Fleetfield", South 16 degree~, 01 minutes 50 seconds East 1li50.11 feet to land of Village of Greenport; thence along said land of Village of Greenport, two courses: (1) South 58 degrees, 15 minutes 00 seconds West 71li.Oli feet; thence (2) South 7li degrees, liS minutes 00 seconds West 670.00 feet to said easterly line of Moore's Lane; I I I thence along said easterly line of Moore's Lane, North 17 degrees, 15 minutes, 00 seconds West 1523.22 feet to the point of BEGINNING. Containing li8.7186 ac res. I i' , Any person desiring to be heard on the proposed amendment should ;:Ippp-rlr ;:Jt the time and pl;:u",:p. t=thovp c;n "'ppdfiP.d ~ DATED: October 8, 1985. " " JUDITH T. TERRY SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK * * * Page ",PUbliC Hearing - John A. cos. I' " PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE, OCTOBER 17, 1985, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH T. TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, .SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971. Copies to the following: !; The Suffolk Times The Long Island Traveler-Watchman Town Board Members Town Clerk's Bulletin Board /' Southold Town Planning Board J,/ John A. Costello " :1 ;1 il ;I U " " i , I II II I II I, " L .I 'I II II II I I' I , , I !I ,I " I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I. I , t . . ~c9~d.7Zcit ,O/Z/l ~ PUBLIC HEAR ING NOV 1 1985 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OCTOBER 29, 1985 7:30 P.M. IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JOHN A. COSTELLO FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM "A" RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "M" LIGHT MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT AT GREENPORT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK. Present: Supervisor Francis J. Murphy Councilman Joseph L. Townsend, Jr. Justice Raymond W. Edwards Councilman Paul Stoutenburgh Councilman James A. Schondebare Councilwoman Jean W. Cochran * * * Town Clerk Judith T. Terry Town Attorney Robert W. Tasker SUPERVISOR MURPHY: This is a public hearing on the change of zone petition of John A. Costello, the legal notice to be read by Councilman Townsend. COUNC ILMAN TOWNSEND: The legal notice reads as follows: "Pursuant to Section 265 of the Town Law and requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, a public hearing will be held by the Town Board of the Town of Southold at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., on the 29th day of October, 1985, on the proposal of John A. Costello to amend the Building Zone Ordinance, (including the Building Zone Maps) of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, by changing from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District all that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and more particularly bounded and described as follows:" What follows is a the metes and bounds description which I'll dispense with now. The property lies on southeast corner of Route 48 and Moores Lane, approximately 48 acres. We have notice of publication in The Suffolk Times, The Long Island Traveler- Watchman, and posted on the Town Clerk's Bulletin Board. There is a recommendation from the County Planning Board which reads as follows: "Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on October 2, 1985 reviewed the above captioned application and after due study and deliberation Resolved to approve it subject to the following: 1. Premises shall be restricted for affordable housing accomodations; 2. All dwelling units shall be owner occuped; and 3. A qualified purchaser clause shall be established with occupancy guaranteed for a minimum of five (5) years. If the housing unit is sold prior to the expiration of such time period, all profits shall be retained by the Town of Southold for affordable housing purposes." Signed, Lee Koppelman. We have a letter from the Town Planning Board: "Resolved that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board that the change of zone application of John Costello from "A" Agricultural and Residential to "M" Light Multiple, located at Greenport, be approved. It is the Planning Board's intent, in enforsing the M, Light Multiple zone, to obtain affordable housing. Therefore, the Board also recommends Page 2 - Costeahange of Zone hearing . t ~ that any approval be conditioned upon obtaining approved covenants and restrictions to parallel the "Hamlet Density" zone in the proposed zoning ordinance to provide for affordable housi ng. " There are a couple of letters on the file. One is a statement by Martin Trent of Orient. He would like it read so I will comply with that request. "Statement by Martin Trent of Orient, New York to the Southold Town Board regarding the Costello zone change request at the public hearing held on October 29, 1985. I believe the Town Board members already know my views, and that I can support those views with facts. So, I'll just briefly restate them for the record. I oppose the size and density of the requested downzoning. It is eight times the density currently allowed. Two acre zoning was adopted by Southold to preserve its rural character, quality of life, and to protect the environment. One quarter acre zoning does nothing to further these goals. The proposed downzoning would result in the loss of open space and a desperately needed watershed area for the Village of Greenport's water supply. One quarter acre zoning does nothing to address these problems. The requested downzoning is contrary to the recommendations of the North Fork Water Supply Plan, allowing up to eight times the consumptive water use. This is of great concern considering that Greenport Water District had to close down well fields 4 and 8 this past summer due to saltwater intrusion. One quarter acre zoning would make matters worse and exacerbate this situation. The proposed downzoning would result in Southold Town subsidizing greater profits for a real estate speculator who knowingly purchased a property zoned two acres. I don't need to hear lectures about the desirability of affordable housing. Of course it's desirable. I've worked my tail off since I was 16 years old to make my home affordable! The Town Board need not approve this proposal just because it's there. Southold deserves better. For these reasons, I ask the Town Board to retain the current zoning. " The second letter is from William L. Schoreher, President, Stirling Eastern Shores. "We wish to bring to your attention that recent statements made as to the current zoning of Eastern Shores as being 1/3 acre is incorrect. Eastern Shores is comprised of two sections - the smaller of the two entering on McCann's Lane. This contains 66 lots on 35.05 acres; the average lot being approximately 1/2 acre in size. The larger portion of Eastern Shores enters onto Moore's Lane North and is nearest the Costello property; consequently it will be most effected by any down zoning. This section is zoned for 1/2 acre lots with some parcels nearly an acre or more. Also, please be aware that Homestead, Acres, a new development now under construction near the Costello property is zoned for 1/2 to one full acre plus lots. Thank you for your time, we hope this clarifies some of the facts involved." I believe that is the entire file. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Thank you, Joe. Is there anyone here would Iike--I see the applicant here. Would he like to address the Town Board, or his representative? John? MR. JOHN A. COSTELLO: Well, as you all know there is a lack of affordable housing projects in Southold. I'm not recommending that even this could possibly be affordable. Moderate income housing is a problem. There are no small lots. They are being bought up. I don't know if Mr. Trent is here--- SUPERVISOR MURPHY: He's not here. MR. COSTELLO: Mr. Trent is advocating--there is a watershed area in this district. If the water isn't used in some areas, this water isn't stagnated, it flows out to the sea, then it is lost. There's hundreds of acres of watershed area next to this parcel in the Greenport area. There's water on this parcel that I think will accomodate more than what we're advocating on the property. Presently I don't believe that Southold .pa~e 3 - Costello Change of ZO.hearing . Town has the zoning, has any guarantees, has any stipulations that will guarantee any type of affordable housing. "M" zone, I don't believe, completely does it. Southampton has modified their "M" zone and gives an incentive for putting higher densities on. For instance on their similar "M" zone zoning their incentive is to put more houses on the property you have to allow a certain percentage of that housing to be developed as moderate income housing. Even on their five acre parcels, their three acre parcels in Southampton they'll give you increased density if you will allow a percentage of that density to go to affordable housing. This hasn't been done in Southold. You know, as of July 16th you decreased the density on the "M" zone. With water and sewer, before July 16th, there was six units--dwelling units allowed. In July you reduced it to four. Without water and sewer you have it down to two. I mean I'm sure there must have been a lot of thought into that. This "M" zone presently and the reason for this hearing only allows one acre parcels. If the "M" zone is approved. It's going to take time to pursue water and sewer. Mr. Trent also speaks about consumptive use of water. Roof runoff with dry well systems, proper recharging in the area, which is basically one of the Planning Board's jobs, will have a positive result in groundwater. Mr. Trent, you know, can figure that one out and then he can talk with his engineers or whoever, you know. I know Mr. Trent isn't speaking for the Health Department, but as an individual and God bless him for it. These concerns, right now are to try to get the lots developed to give any of the young people the best opportunity that's available in Southold Town. Presently "M" zone is it. I think there's a lot of work that has to be done on it. I'm going to try to pursue the "M" zone. Thank you. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Thank you, John. Merle, do you want to speak? f- MR. MERLON WIGG IN: I might just add a couple of things to what John has already said. The "M" zone, as you know, is limited to 40,000 square feet. The density can be four units. This means you would have a choice of apartment type units of four units within a single structure. This makes it difficult to pursue the public idea of quarter acre zoning and sweat equity in your own house on your own lot. Now one thing this perhaps does do is that after the "M" zone is approved and the master planner comes along the line and then it gets changed to a Hamlet Density, then that provides the provision to go to one quarter acre lots, which is what we've been talking about at many of the public hearings. I would just like to clarify that. This "M" zone is only a step towards what we've been trying to achieve for the affordable housing and moderate income housing. The other thing I might add is that this is probably---Iet me back up a second. When we did the DEIS we were directed to look at other lots that would be available in Southold Town that could be developed for moderate income houses. This is probably the best possible there is available that has the most easy access to public water and public sewer. Some of the others do have public water, but none of them have public sewer. Most of the others are zoned two acres now, with one, I think, proposed in the Master Plan to be zoned one acre. So it's been talked about numbers of need in Southold Town of 150 to 200 house lots or moderate income housing units. This is probably one of the best parcels available for this. If this is not pursued along this line then it makes it more difficult, in our opinion, to find other parcels that could be used to meet the needs of the moderate income housing. Hopefully I clarified some of the things of what the "M" zone does and what it does not do. ~ COUNCILMAN STOUTENBURGH: Merlon, excluse me. Would you just clarify that first point again. Page 4 - Costell.hange of Zone hearing . '. - MR. WIGGINS: The size of the "M" zone lots? COUNCilMAN STOUTENBURGH: Yes. MR. WIGGINS: That's 20,000 square feet, so to achieve the density of four units per acre, or 40,000 square feet, it has to be in a single structure. There is only one structure allowed per acre lot in the "M" zone. Does that clarify that? COUNCILMAN STOUTENBURGH: Yes. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Okay. On the left over here, is there anyone would like to speak in favor of this proposed zone change? (No response.) Anyone in the middle? (No response.) Anyone on the right? (No response.) Anyone like to speak in opposition to this proposed zone change? Go ahead, sir. MR. WI llAIM L. SCHOREHER: First of all in yesterday's Newsday it said that John Costello is going to build 72 houses in this area. Is Mr. Costello going to be the prime contractor on this project? And will the 72 homes take up the entire property, 50 or 48.5 acres, whatever it is? If not, what's going to happen to the balance of the acreage? Number two, I don't know where Mr. Costello got his information from, but Eastern Shores and Homestead Acres are not 1/3 acres. They are half acre plots. And number three, I don't think I'm stupid, but I would like to know what affordable housing is in Southold Town? Nobody has ever defined it or described it to me. I would like somebody to describe it to me, whether it be Mr. Costello or Joe Townsend. Thank you. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Is there anyone else would like to make any comments? (No response.) Anyone like to make any comments at all? John? MR. COSTEllO: I'd like to answer Mr. Schoreher. There's five different subdivisions in Eastern Shores. Anytime you'd like to submit the maps of the division. The largest parcel on it is one acre lot up on the Sound and down on McCann Drive and a few of those Drives it calculates the entire subdivision, there are three houses per acre and I'm willing to supply him with maps. At that day and age, you know, that was allowable 'lnd it's a fact and I think it's a good community for the Village of Greenport and Town of Southold. We need that size lots. I'm not condemning them for it. This subdivision was just planned that way and it was allowed at that time. Well, as affordable housing goes, and he wants an explanation on affordable housing, I think that to start affordable housing is trying to get a smaller lot at the most economical price in the hands of the person that needs it. That's a start. I think--I don't believe that any young person, and I'm sure and himself included, didn't contribute and didn't work on his house in stages over a period of years. A second home builder might be able to ,write the checks. The working man and the younger people, and I'm sure most everyone here, everyone in this room, put the sweat equity into it because they didn't have the money, but they had plenty of backbone. That develops into affordable housing. They can stop anytime you get tired. Or run out of money. And each and everyone of us doesn't have wheelbarrows full of it. As a second home, if you sold ypur first one and made a big profit, you might be able to hire the entire job out. I would hate to build a house, with a garage, landscape it, put sod in, put sprinkler systems in, pour the water on the grass, have it green, and then have some young guy say, you worked it right out of my ballpark. I can't afford the garage, the fireplace, the sod, the sprinklers, but I would take the bare house. And I think there's more people in that field and more people with that need than any other single group in Southold and I'd like to see them get it. Get that opportunity. And I believe that Southold Town has that obligation to make sure they do. Thank you. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Thank you, John. Joe, would you like to make a comment? . P<tge- 5 - Costello Change of za hearing . COUNCILMAN TOWNSEND: Just on--I don't to--wanted to know what the price, or what was. That was, I think, your question. know whether Mr. Schoreher was referring I thought the price of affordable housing MR. SCHOREHER: That's right, Joe. What is the price for affordable housing? COUNCILMAN TOWNSEND: I think on the Housing Committee they looked at that and the figures they came up with were, I think, between $65,000 and $70,000, based on the mean income of Southold residents. I have to review their report, which I didn't bring with me at this time, but I think that was the figure they came up with. There are guidelines as to what affordable housing is and it's based on a certain percentage of your income being used for mortage payments and so forth, and making certain assumptions about how much money you may have set aside. But generally that figure is anywhere from $65,000 to $80,000. I think in this Town it's a little bit shy of $80,000 because we don't have that high a mean income. Jay just points out that under certain proposals that we have before us they're proposing a $58,000 house. That house is subsidized by the other houses in that particular proposal. I know that Greenport has found someone who will put a house up on a lot for $48,000 and those are under contract now. MR. SCHOREHER: Is this considered subsidized housing? COUNCILMAN TOWNSEND: No, I don't believe it's considered subsidized, other than the fact there may be some zoning considerations. That could be a subsidy of sorts, but I don't think it's subsidized by any straight dollars from the Federal government or from your taxes. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Okay. Is there any other Town Board member would like to make any comments on this? COUNCILMAN TOWNSEND: I'm just answering some questions. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Would you like to make some comments on the hearing? COUNCILMAN TOWNSEND: No. SUPERVISOR MURPHY: Jay? (No.) Jean? (Thank you, no.) Ray? (Nothing, thank you.) Paul? (No.) Anyone else? (No response.) If not we'll close the hearing. Hearing closed at 7: 53 P.M. * * * '~4~u(~~</-~ <0jJudlth T. Terry c7 Southold Town Clerk ~-~ - , Southold. N, Y, 11971 (516) 765-1938 September 17, 1985 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 RE: Change of Zone John Costello Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, September 16, 1985. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to ~ the Town'Board that the change of zone application of John c-~ Costello from "A" Agricultural and Residential to "M" Light Multiple, located at Greenport, be approved. It is the Planning Board's intent, in endorsing the M, Light- MUltiple zone, to obtain affordable housing. Therefore, the Board also recommends that any approval be conditioned upon obtaining approved covenants and restrictions to parallel the "Hamlet Density" zone in the proposed zoning ordinance to provide for affordable housing. Very truly yours, ~'Dt~~jl1J~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR., cliiIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS . SEP J 1985 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 28, 1985 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gent/emen: Transmitted herewith is the petition of John A. Costello requesting a Change of Zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M" Light Multiple Residence District on certain property located on the corner of Route 48 and Moores Lane, Greenport, New York. Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in'" said petition and determine the area so affected by your recommendation and transmit the same to me. Very truly yours, ~M ~'~:r- Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Attachment ~13\1>.5 . SEPf 1985 COSTEllO MARINE CONTRACTING CORPORATION DOCK BUILDING · JETTIES · BULKHEADING · STEEL & WOOD PILING. FOUNDATIONS RECEIVED I/.US 211985 BOX AK . GREENPORT. NEW YORK 11944 . (516) 477-1199 . (516) 477-1393 Town Clerk Southold August. 19, 1985 ~ ~rs. Juiith Terry, 'lbwn Clerk '1b wn of Southold '-lain Road S:lUt hold, N. Y . t> ~e: Town of Southold, EAF Dear Mr s. Terry: Enclosed please find a completed Environmental Assessment Fbrm, Parts 1 & 2 for the proposed zoning change of the M:>ore slane, Gr eenport, N. Y. property. ~ the best of my knowledge, I have provided answers to all applicable questions. )bur s trul Y , t7~ A. Co stello JAC/eml enc. P.s. The required surveys are being prepared as specified and will follow shortly. '.,----- 'ff)- . ....1, ...... 'J..: ,- .:..~ <II '" ., , RECEIVED IA\J6 21 \985 . TOIVN OF SOUTHOLD St3 1985 To""" Cle'" Southolc:l EAF ENVIRO:IMENTAL ASSESSMENT: 'PART Project InforTl'lGtion "OTICE: ThlS doC~~n: t~ de"~ned to assist In determintng whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on t~e eflvlr':-ll'f\tant. PieaSl!' eOl'lJ1lete the entire Data Sheet. Answers tl1 these questions ..i11 be cor.siderec IS D4rt o( the I9pli~atlon for appreval and ~y be subject to further Yerfflc4~;on and public review. Provide Iny.dditi.n.l InfO""4tion you belte.e will be needed to comoleu PARTS 2 .nd 3. . !t is e'Pecto. tn.t CO~.lctjcn of the EAF will bo dopendent on inf.rm.tion cu~rontlY ...fl.ble .nd will not ::.:~;:c:~ ;~~d::;~i~;'::;~\~~t:~;:~tiqitjon. If info"".tion requirinp such .ddition.1 work 15 unmilable. . ~AME OF PROJECT: NAME ANO AODRESS OF OWNER (If Oifferont) s/E: cor. of "1oore I slane , '. &. Cq 411 -,\. (N.mo) SAME '- '---- . A~OArss AND NAlfE OF APPUCANT: ------------ (Str..t) c:::n.MR ,ro hn A. C oute 110 TJi-r-------------- 206 Wiqgi.nu Lane (H....t) Greenport, N.Y. 11944 IP,O,) (Stat.) (Zip) 711""1\""- "......., SAME BUSfN~SS PHONE: (Stite) 477-1199 (lIp) DtSCAIPTIC~ OF pqOJECT' (Bri.f1y describ. typo of proJ.ct or actton) Rezone 48.71 ac. p~rrpl f~om current RI-AG to ~l (~ulti-family residential) (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTIon - Indlc.te N,A. if not applic.bl.) A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Phystc.1 'etting of ov.,.11 project, both do.elonod .hd unde.eloped .ro.s) 1. Ceneral character of the land: rMtnerally untform slope Generally uneven and rolltnQ or irre~ular _' (elev. 9-22') . - . 2. Pre..nt land use: ~ro'n , Indu'd,f^\: . Comnercill, 'l~b~~ . Ruro1 . Forest -' Ag'iculture~, Other va a 'Land prevJ.UtrS i 11 ' e:~~~B ' "8 71 un1er going OLa I: e ""uC 3. iota I acreage of oroject aree . acres. Aooroximate acreage: Presently After Completion Meadow or 9rushland ~lCres _L.eres ~_.cres _acres Hater Surface Area Presently After Completion o _acres _ _ _ac."~s Fores ted __acres Un..g.t.tod (rock. ...th or fl11) 2__acres __acres Aaricultural acres - Roads, buildinQS and other j).ved surf"ces ~_ac!"'es ~acrcs __ae!".s l'~tl.tnd (Fre~hwdter or Tidal ~s ner Artlcles ~4, ;.~ or ~.C.L.) _~acres _acres 4. '4rat l! "'''edolftil'l"nt soil typ~(s) on r)ro~ect SUe? -1'2.E.._~'?...i_!.L _~1.::lXI._S2E~ . 5. . ~'''e :ner~ ~"fJrO'1( outcrO'Jolnos on "lr01Pct Slt~? Y X &I '?iverhead Sandy loam) ~s __:1C' \_"'- O~he' (indic.te ty.e) ._.cre! ,:~::& t. ""p!a;. a d~:)"h tc bedroc~? .--.--~,QQ.~--.__._.._('" 'eet) OIV} .( . . 6. A;>pro.inate percent.~e of proposed project site with slooes: O-lO:1_2.~~: In-H~ _I: 15: Or. greater _So 7. Is prOject contiguous to. or contain a bul1dintt or site listed on the National Reghter of Historic Phces? Yes X No . - - 8. Wh.t h the depth to the water table? 5-1a,.~et 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? _____yes ~No 10. Does project 51te contatn any species of plant or animal life that is identified IS threatened or end.noered - ~Yes ~lo. according to _ Identify each species . . . 11. Are there .ny unique or unusu.l land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs. dunes. other geological form.tions - ______yes ~No. (Describe 12. Is the prOject 51te presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation are. - ______yes ~No. 13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? ______Yos ~No 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of stream and name of river to Which It is tributary N/A (none) ------..---------.------. 15 Lakes. I'onds, I'etlantl are.. within or c.lltlgu.II. to pr'oject area: a . Ila.. _...I1QM ; b. Size (In .cres) ;~/A . 16. Wh.t Is the domin.nt l.nd use and zoning cl.ssificatlon within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g, single family residential, R-2) .nd the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). Bingle. family ce.sidential 1-2 story B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) 48.71 .0 Total contiguou, acreage owned by project sponsor Icres. b. Project acreage developed: ~ acres initially: 48. 7~res ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped loA.:! t .:llllt. compa table .wi th zonin<j regulation s d. Length of project, in miles:' (if appropri.te) (1500 'x1400' ~ ) e. If projei-t is an expansion of ex1stinq, indicate percent at expansion proposed: building ~iquare foot- age N't/\: : developed acreage NIl\: . , f. lIumber of off-str"'t parking spaces existin9 0 ; proposed _ i !Ht .' . g. Ha.lmum vehicular trios generated per hour (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of hOUSing units: * :;)ne fam; ly Two Family Hultiple Family Condominium Initial 7'") 0 118 0 Ul t Imate 1'j. 0 US 0 1. If: Orientation :~e 19hbornood-Ci ty- Reg; ona 1 Estimated Emoloyment COlm1erclAI 140n~ 'J1l\ Indust,.;.1 none !l/l\. j. Total he'9ht of tallest ~roposed structure 30 feet. .-If '1 b'l't of public sewer and water and To be determine1 based on ava1 a 1 1 Y Planning Board recomendations. . . p' {. . ',.'. . . " . . . , . . 2. How much natural material (1.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be rerroved from the site- n o tons cubic yards. 3. Ho~ many acres of veqetation (trees. shrubs. ground covers) will be r~ved fro~ site ~~acr~s. 4. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by tn15 project? _____yes ~NO 5. Are th,rr. any plans for re-vegetation to reolace that removed during construction? ~~es _____~o 6. If single Dhase project: Anticipated period of construction~/1\ months. (including demolition). 7. If multi-~hased oroject: a. Total number of phases anticipated ~No. b. Anti:ioated date of commencement phase ~ ______month ~vear (including demolition) . pen:ll.ng c. Approximate completion date final phase month _~ea~. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseQuent ohases? _____yes ~NO 8. Nill blasting occur during construction? ______yes ~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during constructfon~. after project is complete 11--. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ______yes ~o. If yes. explain: 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? -X-Yes _No" b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial. etc.) ""oc.!;non+-; ::11 c. If surface disposal name of stream into whicn effluent will be discnarged WA 13. Will surface area of existing lakes. ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? ~Yes ~No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? _Yes L-No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? ~Yes _____No b. If yes. will an existing solid waste disoosal facility be used? _Yes __NoT/B/D c. If yes. give name: : location d. Hill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? _Yes _Polo 16. Will project use herbicides or pp.sticides? _____yes ~~o 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more tnan one hour Der day)? ______yes ~No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? _____yes ~NO 19. ~il1 project result in an increase in energy use? ~Yes _____No. If yes. indicate type{s) residential consumption 20. If water supoly is from wells indicate purtloing capacitYlD..Dl14' gals/I'l;nute. 21. Total anticiflated water usage per day 2.o..,..o.oll...-9als/day. 22. 2 acre Hhat is doninant zoning classification of site? _~"--Ar: M (town of Southold) Current soecific zon1ng classification of site '-2.__ Zoning: a. b. c. !S orooosed US~ CQ"lsisten": ''I1th I"lresent zonin~? nn d. M-l If no. indicate desired ZQrlnq -}- . . " .1 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal penmtt required? ______yes ~No b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? _____yes _~No c. local and Regional approvals: Approval Required (Yes. No) (Type) Submittal (Date) Approval (Date) C i t Y . CToWlt,. V 1110 ge CBoa;:a-, City. ~ Village ~ng Board City. Town. Zoning Board City. County Health Department Other local agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies ;:s<: :i:IT'"C~n~~f~1fnge- R-l q-85-__ C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS . . Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated wit the proposal. please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid t m. PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: REPRESENTING: DATE: " August 19,1985 -4- : . ~ ..,. "'1 . . EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART II Proiect Impacts and Their Maqnitude Gen!ral tnf~""'3ti'):1 ("F-:!r! Cdrefully) - In comple~ing t;.t fo~ tht reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reascr.aD1e: The reviewer is not expected to be an exoert environmental analyst. - Identifying t~at a. effect will be potentially large (column Z) does not mean that it 5fonifica~t. Ar;y lc!r9~ effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to detennine significance. eftect in column Z simply asks that it be looked at furthor. is also necessarily By identifying an - The Examoles provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possi~le the thres of magnItuDe that would trigger a response in column Z. The examples are generally applicable throughout th, State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or tower thresholds may be more ap_ro_riate for a Potential Large Impact rating. . Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore. the examples have been offered as guidar They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each nuestion. . The number of examples per question does 'not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART Z. Answer ~ if there will be ~ effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as' Yes answers. c. If answering ves to a ouestion then check the appropriate box (column 1 or Z) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any exampie provided. check column Z. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact tile" consider tne imoact as ootentially large and proceeo to PART 3. . . t. If a potentially large magnitude, place a Yes impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than large in colUr:ln 3. A No response indicates. that such a reduction is not possible. 1. 2.. 3. IMPACT ON LANO NO YES 00 1. .ILL THERE BE A~ <FFEeT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHAHGE TO PROJECT SiTE? Examoles that WOuld A~olJ to Column Z Any constru~t;o~ on slopes of 15% or greater. {15 foot rise ~er 100 foot of lenatn:. or where the general slooes in the project area eJtceed 10:: Construction on land where the denth to the water table is less than 3 feet. ronstruction af naved narkina are-l f'('Ir 1, """''1 or more vehicles. ~nstruction on lan1 where bedrOCk 1S ex~osed or qenerally within J feet of existing ground surface. ~ !:ons:ruct;o~ tha' will continue for more than year or involve mo~e tha~ 0r.e ~~ase or stage. EJ~~v"tion 'or ~;~;n~ ,urposes that would ~emove ~ore than 1,000 tons c,f r.at:Jral M~terial (Le. rock or soll) fler year. Construct;on of any new sanitary landfill. -5- SMAll TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT 8E MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT I~PACT PROJECT CMANGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . Construction in a desi9nlted floodway. Other impacts: 2. 1f') ~Ill THERE BE AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL lP.Nn FnRMS IV\r'\ rOUNO ON THE SITE? (i.e. cliff.. dunes. oeoloaical fo","- ~ tlans, etc.) . . . S!?ecific lana forms: /t'PACT ON WATER NO 3. WIll PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATEP. BODY DESIGNATED AS ..........~ PROTECTEO? (Under Articles 1S, 24, 2S of the Envfr- ~ onmental Conservation Law. E.C.L.) Examoles that ~ould A~ply to Column 2 Dredgino ~re than lOq cubic yards of material from channel of I protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: 4. WIll PROJECT AFFECT ANY lION-PROTECTED EXISTING OR NFH NO BDOY OF lIATER? .....................H.....................QD Examoles that Wo~ld Apply to Column 2 A 101 increase or decrease 1n the surface area of any body of ~ater or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other {mlets: ------------.- S. WIll PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER nllAllTY? NO (Z) , -r. EXI"oles that Would Ap,ly t.o Column 2 * Project will re~uire a discharge peMmft. Project requires use of a source of water that does not have aporoval to serve ,reposed project. PreJect requires water supply frc.m wells with "reater than 1!5 9a110ns per minute ~umoin9 capaCity. ~ Construction or ooeration causing any contamination of a pUblic water supply system. ;( * Project will adversely affect groundwater. liqUId effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities wnich presently do not exist or have inadeQuate capaclty. ~ Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of Z~lryOO gallons per day. _ PrOject will lHelj cause siltation or other dhcharge into an existing t=~y of water to the extent that there will be an ~bvjous visual contrast to natural conditions. * * To be determine1 ~.'-'. \" .<. . '. . 1. 2.. 3. C\~!4ll Tf) POTE~TIAl CAN I "PACT BE '"'DERATE l^RGE REDUCEO BY I 'MParr IMPACT P~OJECT CHANGE - - - - - - YES - - - - - - - - - YES C - - -. - - - - - - - - - YES 0 - - - - - - - - - I , YES - - - 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . '. ,I: ". .' .' . . . . , . . 1. 2.. ~. "ltl'\4"r lrnoacts. 'lALL Tr pnTE~Tl^L WI IIlPACT BE WlOEP,ATE LARGE REDUCED oy I!~?AC7 P'P~CT PP~J ECT CHA"GE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . 6. :IlLL PRnJECT ALTER ORAI"ME FLC". P^TTEP:IS OR SIIRFA~E !IATER NO YES R~N~FF? ...................... .,............................ <DO Exam"le tha~ '~ould JI.l"lply to Colum 2 Project W"ut~ ;~ede flood water flows. PI"'O.1ect is likely to cause substantial erosion. Project is t"co~attble with existing drainage patterns. Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. 110 YES \lILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR OUALlTT?..........................OO 0 rumples tl'lat Would Apply to Calum 2 Project w111 1nduce".noo or II'Ore vehicle trips 1n any given hour. Project will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ('f refuse per hour. Project emission rate of all contll~1nlnts will exc~erl 5 lbs. Del'" hour or a heat snurce "reducing IIIOrll! than 1~ million BTU's per hour. Other tmoacts: I~D~rT O~ Pl~NTS ANn ~~!~Al ~ 8. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR ENOANr.EREO SPECIES? ~ YES ~O Examtlles that Would Apoly to Column 2 ~p.duct;on of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site. over or near site or found on the site. Retl'Qval of any oort;on of a critical or sioniffcant wild- 1ff. /l.bit.>t. '~D')l ieat;n" of Pesticide or "lernici de over more than t~'ice a ~ear' other- ttun for o!J9'~lc;,"t.ur~l P"rpoi'~s. Ot1"!r ir:loacts: 9. !IILL P~OJECT SUBSTA:ITIALLY AFFECT l!nN.THREATE:IEO OR NO YES E~OANr,ERED SPECIES? .......................................(3) 0 ~ that would Apply to Colu~ 2 rro]ect would sUDstantially lntel"fel"'e with an:' res;r1ent or 1l'I1Qratory fish or wildlife specles. Project reauires the r~moval of nor! than 1~ acres of nature fcrest (over 100 years in ane) or other locallv lr:lportant ~egetation. -7- . . " ...'J .' 1. 2.. 3. Ell.,Jm.,l~s that llould A?ply to Column 2 An incom~atible visual affect caused by the intro~uction of new l"Iatcrlals. colors and/or forms 'in tentrast to the surroundin~ landsca,e. ~o "ALL Tn oCTErlTIAL CA:I WPACT BE ~DERATE LARGE REDUCED ~Y rl.4p~Ci to'r.a,cl' PRllJECT C~.a,j1~E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - P'\"Ir,CT ('.: ':ISt'IlL Q':S~~'RCE 1'. l!I1.L T!4E tlonJfCT ArrEC":' VI~!/~. "ISTAS l:l~ THf '/15t1A,L C~~.~ACTER OF TIlE :IFIGHsnR"f)()D nr. CD"""IITV? .............. A. oroject eaSn? visible. not easily screened._tllat is obviousl.v different fror.'l nth-:rs around ft. . . Project ~il1 result in the plf~ination or major screening of scenic views or vistas known to be important to the area. Other impacts: ,. , I~PACT ON HlqD~IC RESOURCES 11. \lILL PROJECT mpP.CT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC. NO YES PP.E.'HSTOPIC OR PALEO~lTOr,ICAL lI~rDPTANCE? .................(6)0 EUr.'Ioles that I~ould Aool.v to Colunn 2 Prt'.iect occurina wholly or oartially within or contiguous to any facilitv or site listed on the National Renister of historic ~laces. Any impact to an archeological site or fossil bp.d located within the project site. I)ther im::lacts: I"PACT ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATION 12. WILL THE PRnJECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR OUALITY OF EXISTING NO' YES OR FUTURE OPEll SPACES OR RECRE.~TIorl.AL OPPDRTU~IlTIES?..... <X) 0 Examoles that ~Iould Aopl.v to Column 2 TI1e pemanent foreclosure of a future recreational ODDortunity. A major rp.duction of an open space important to the co~unity. Other i:noacn: I"O~CT ON TPANSPOPTATIO~ Exa~oles tnat Would ~~~lv to Colu~n 2 NO YES 000 13. !'ILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO EXISTlNC TRANSPORTATION SYSTE"S? ............................................... Alteration of present ~atterns of nove~ent of oeople and/or goods. Proiect will result in severe traffic nroblems. ___ Other '~pacts: -8, . ~. ", ~:. .:'. 't . I~PACT ON E~IERGY . 1 2. ~ S'1All TO Pn.TE~TI.4l CAil IMPACT CE f~DERHE lMGE REDUCED BY IMPACT I'iPACT PROJECT CHANGE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14. IlIll PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO YES ENERr,y SUPPLY? . . ., . . .. .. u . . . .. .. . .. u . .. . . .. . u .. .. . .. .."" 0 Examoles that Would Apply to Column Z ~ Project causing oreater than 5~ increase in any form of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 sinqle Dr 'two family residences. . Other impacts: IMPACT ml NOISE 15. WIll THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODCRS, NOISE, GLARE, VIBRATION NO YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? u..1Y\ 0 Examoles that Woulrl Aooly to Column Z ~ Blasting with;n 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive fac;lity. Odors wnl occur routinely (.ore than one hour per day). Project will oroduce ooerating noise exceed;nn the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Project will reMOve natural barriers that would act as a notse screen. Other ;mpacts: IHPACT ml HEALTH & HAZARDS 16. !Ull PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC ilEAL TH AND SAFETY? NO YFS ..... u u u u(g) 0 Examol.. that Ilould ~pply to Column Z Project will cause a risk of ex~losion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticidr.s. chemicals, rarliation. etc.) in the event of accident or UDset conditions, or there will he a chronic low level discharge or eMission. . Proj~ct that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" (i.e. toxic, poisonous. highly reactive. radioactive. irritating. infectious. etc., includinn wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases.) Storace facilitip.s for one million or more qallnns of liouified natural gas or other liouids. I')ther imoacts: ------------ ------.----. ------ .--. -!'. . . , .. '.'~ . l"lALL TII MODERr.TE H'PAr.T POTE;mAL LARr,E !I1P~CT CMN 1M"." I dE REDUCED BY PROJECT CHANGE I~PACT 011 GR01lTH AND CHARACT,R OF CO~llUNITY OR II!:Ir,HRnR"OOD 17. WIll PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPACTER "F THE EXISTING NO YES :::~:T::a~ .~~~;~.~~~;~. ~~. ~~;~~.~............."...... "(6) 0 . The population of the City, Town or Village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5'; of resident human goputatfon. The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or ooera- ting services wi 11 increase by more than 5% per year as a resul t of thi 5 project. . . " , . IF ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS IDEIITIFIED AS A PryTEUTIAL LARGE IMPACT on IF YOU CANNOT DETERMINE THE MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT. PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: DETER~INATION PART I '-- PART II _ PART 3_ Upon review of the fnfamltia" recorded on this EAF (Parts " 2 and 3) and cons1der1nq both the ma9nftude and fmoortance of each impact. it 15 r.asonably determined that: PREPARE A IIEr.ATIVE DECLARATION A. The project wnl result in no major impacts and, therefore. is one which may not cause significant dama~e to the environment. o B. Althou9h the project could have a significant effect on the ~nvlronmentl there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mjti~aticn measures described in PART 3 have been included as part of the Droposed project. . C. The project will result in one or more major adverse impacts that cannot be reduced and may cause si~nificant damage to the envi~nmpnt. Oate PREPARE A N~VE nECLARATIOU PREPARE POSITIVE ORATlOU PROCEED WITH EIS '{ Slgnature of Preoarer (if different from responsible officer) Signatureot Rl>spons;ble Official in Lead :~gencv Jrint or tyoe na....e of responsible official in Lead Agenc 1/. < -Ie- - - ~ .. f .. .._'\0', . . . E~F ErlVIROUMENTAL ASSESS'1EIH PART II I EVMUATlO:1 OF THE 1~1PORTA~CE OF IMPACTS 1~IFOR~T1O:I - Part J is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially laroe. . The amount of writin~ necessary to answer Part 3 may bp. determ;ned by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient infonmation to indicate the reasonableness of ~v decisions? INSTRUCTlOIIS t COm?lete the followinq for each impact or effect identified in Column Z of Part Z: 1. Br1efly describe the impact. 2. Oe.cribe (if apolicab1e) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a Ie.. than lar~e imnact by a pro- Ject c~ange. 3. Rased on the information available, decide if it is reasonahle to conclude that this inract is jmoortant to the mtnictpal1ty (citYI town or village) in which the project is located. To answer the question of importance. consider: The probability of the impact or .ffect occurrinq - The duration of the impact or effect Its irreversibility, including penmanently lost resources or values Whether the impact or effect can be controlled - The regional consequence of the im~act or eff~ct Its potential divergence from local needs and goals - ~hether known Objections to the project a~ply to this impact or effect. OETER."INATION OF SIG:IlFlCA'ICE ^n action is considered to bp. significant if: nne (or more) imoact is determined to both ~ and its (their) conseauence, based on the review above, is imoortant. PAPT III STATE~E~TS (Continue on ^ttachments, as needed) -11- . . ESSEKS, HEFTER, CUDDY & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAl N STREET P. O. Box 279 R1VERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 SEP J 1985 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. HEFTER CHARLES R. CUDDY STEPHEN R. ANGEL. .JAM ES HEFFRON (516) 369-1700 WATER MILL. OFFICE MONTAUK H IGHWA'f P. Q. Box 570 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 (516) 726-6633 TnEx-EHCA 6852318 UW THOMAS J. OS'RE~IVED AU6 1 5 iSdS August 15, 1985 Town Clerl< Southold Town of Southold Town Clerk Main Road southold, New York 11971 DELIVERED BY HAND Re: Application of John Costello Change of zoning status Gentlemen: Enclosed herewith please find an original and two copies of the petition of John Costello which seeks a Change of zoning status Classifcation for his property which is now zoned "A" (Residential and Agricultural) to "M" (Light Multiple Residence). Also enclosed is an original "Notice" together with an original affidavit of mailing to all adjacent property owners. It is my understanding that Mr. Costello dropped off the required $500.00 check. very truly yours, /" Ii\-! ~ william w. Esseks WWE:cf Enclosures V...-J' . ~p J 1985 JOHN A. COSTEllO 206 Wiggins Lane Greenper:, New Yerk 11944 RECEIVED AUG 1.61585 August 14, 1985 Town Clerk Southolcl Mrs. Ju:lith Terry, 'lbwn Clerk 'lbwn of S:>uthold Main Road 8:) ut hold , N. Y. 11971 Re: Moore's lane property Dear Mrs. 'Ierry, In lieu of submitting an EAS with the zoning change application, please note that we have recently submitted both a DEIS and a FEIS regarding the above property. The DEIS and FEIS is addressing a change of zone which would have been automatic on the transfer, of property from 8:)uthold I s two acre to the Village of Greenport's qua~tar acre zoning. Therefore,I feel that this application requesting rezoning from two acre to "'1-1 (1/4 ac.l in Southold Town is completely in accord with the FEISonfile. . Your~.t:~~ #.~ .J:>hn A. Costello JAC/ eml cc: Southold Town B::lard . . TOWN BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD _____________________________________x In the Matter of the Application of RECEIVED AU6 1 5 '005 JOHN COSTELLO, Town Clerk Southold petitioner, PETITION h:F, -'<' 1 (J For a Change of zoning Status in The Town of Southold for property located in said Town from "A" (Residential and Agricultural District) to "M" (Light Multiple Residence District). -------------------------------------x TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK The petitioner herein, John Costello, respectfully submits to your Town Board as follows: I 1. petitioner is the owner of a parcel of real property within the Town of southold and consisting of 48.718 acres situate on the east side of Moores Lane and bound on the north by Middle Road (county Road 48), all as described upon Schedule A annexed hereto. Said premises are presently zoned "An (Residential and Agricultural District). By this petition, leave is sought to have the property rezoned to "M" (Light Multiple Residence District). 2. The subject premises was acquired by petitioner from East End Associates by deed dated January 28, 1985 and recorded in the office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on February 28, I 1985 in Liber 9744 at page 117. 3. The subject premises is vacant. It has 1523.22 feet , of frontage on Moores Lane and 1394.55 feet of frontage on County Road 48 and has access on its east from the stub ends of Washington Street and Bennet Road. . . 4. The premises to the east, known as "Map of Fleetwood", Map NO. 1351, is developed on a four (4) units per acre basis. The premises to the north across county Road 48, known as "Eastern Shores Sections 1 through 5", Map Nos. 4021, 4426, 4475, 4586 and 5234, respectively, are developed on a three (3) unit per acre basis. 5. The premises are bounded on the south by lands known as McCann Trailer Park which are employed for recreational purposes for camping and recreational vehicles, and by lands of the Incorporated Village of Greenport which are employed for municipal purposes such as water shed and recreational and municipal utility functions. 6. On the west side of Moores Lane, across from the subject parcel is the Incorporated village of Greenport's Water plant NO.3, the village's sewage treatment plant and the scavenger waste treatment facility now under construction. 7. That upon information and belief, the Town of Southold has an obligation to assist in the community's providing I housing for the residents of the Town regardless of their economic status. This petitioner is desirous of having the zoning status of the property changed so as to allow the property to be developed for multiple residence use. with such a zoning status this petitioner can undertake the construction and marketing of I multiple residence units at a price to the public that will assist in helping fill the existing residential demand for "moderate income" housing. In this manner the Town will be better able to attract and retain workers of a more modest income than , ~ . . that of the "second" homeowners who are able to afford houses on two acre sites. WHEREFORE, your petitioner prays that the Town Board entertain the subject application and upon due consideration change the zoning status of the premises to Light Multiple Residence. Dated: August 14, 1985 II . . . STATE OF NEW YORK) . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)SS.. JOHN COSTELLO, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is the Petitioner herein; that he has read the foregoing Petition and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to the knowledge of your deponent, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief and that as to those matters he believes it to be t ~'J n Costello Sworn to before me this 14th day of August, 1985 (~~ lJ "'1 Notary Public Wll.LIAM WI8SElCI ....,........ .... CJI New Y\wll No. 0-1112178 ~ ....1n~~1..7 .4 11ft...... ..... e t ,. - . . All that certain plot. piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York more particularly bounded and described as follows: Beginning at the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of North Road with the easterly side of Moores Lane; running thence North 66 degrees 09 minutes 10 seconds East along said southerly side of North Road 96.61 feet; running thence Nort~h 69 degrees 02 minutes 10 seconds East still along said southerly side of North Road 985.10 teet; runnin~ thence North 71 degrees 28 minutes 20 seconds East still along said southerly side of North Road 312.64 feet to land now or tormerly of Henry Fleet and Clarence Fleet, now or formerly k.nown as "Fleetfield"; running thence South 16 degrees 01 minutes 50 seconds East along said last mentioned land and along land now or tomerlv of Conc.tant Sootr. and the heirs of Silas I~ebb 1450.11 teet to land no.: or fomerlv of the Village of Greenport; running thence South 5R degrees 15 ~inute~ on seconds West along said last mentioned land 7l~.04 fect; running thence South 74 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconrJ!' Pest still along ::aid last land 670.00 feet to the easterly side of Moores Lane; running thence North 17 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds West along said easterly side of Moores Lane 1523.22 teet to t.he corner t.he point or place of beginning. :-;c:m:lll'u: ^ . .- . .~ . SEP j 1985 TOWN BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD _____________________________________X RECEIVED I\UG t 5 IG3;) In the Matter of the Application of JOHN COSTELLO, 'Town Clerk Southold petitioner, NOTICE For a Change of zoning Status in The Town of Southold for property located in said Town from "A" (Residential and Agricultural District) to "M" (Light Multiple Residence District). _____________________________________X pursuant to SlOO-152 of the Town Code of the Town of southold PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Petitioner herein, John costello, proposes to file a petition with the Town Board of the Town of southold requesting a change of zoning district classification. The description of the property which is the subject of said petition is annexed hereto as schedule A. The present zoning district classification of the property is "A" Residential and Agricultural. The proposed zoning classification district is "M" Light Multiple Residence. within five (5) days hereof, the Petition requesting the change in zoning district classification will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office, Main Road, southold, New york, and may then be examined during regular working hours. A public hearing with respect to the subject petition will be held by the Southold Town Board before such a change of zone can become effective. A notice of said hearing will be -. . .' . published in the official town newspaper not less than ten (10) days prior to the public hearing. At the time and place of the public hearing, all those receiving a copy of this notice, or their representatives, have the right to appear and be heard. This "Notice" is given to those people set forth upon Schedule B annexed hereto, they being the adjacent property owners who are entitled to notice pursuant to Town Code S100-152(A). Dated: August 14, 1985 JOHN COSTELLO, PETITIONER c/o Esseks, Hefter, Cuddy & Angel Attorneys for the petitioner 108 East Main Street P. O. BOx 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 . . - All that certain plot, piece or parcel.of land, altuate, lying and being in the Town of southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York more particularly bounded and described as follows: Beginning at the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of North Road with the easterly side of Moores Lane: running thence North 66 degrees 09 minutes 10 seconds East along said southerly side of North Road 96.61 feet: running thence North 69 degrees 02 minutes 10 seconds East still along said southerly side of North Road 985.10 feet: running thence North 71 degrees 28 minutes 20 seconds East still along said southerly side of North Road 312.64 feet to land now or formerly of Henry Fleet and Clarence Fleet, now or formerly known as "Fleetfield": running thence South 16 degrees 01 minutes SO seconds East along said last mentioned land and along land now or fOlTlerly of Constant Booth and the heirs of Silas '~ebb 1450.11 feet to land no",' or formerly of the Village of Greenport: running thence South 5R degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds West along said last mentioned land 714.04 feet: running thence South 74 degrees 45 Minutes 00 seconds "!est still along said last land 670.00 feet to the easterly side of Moores Lane: running thence North 17 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds Nest along said easterly side of Moores Lane 1523.22 feet to the corner the point or place of beginning. SCHEDULE A . Mr. & Mrs. Willard Crayton 390 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. & Mrs. James E. Chute 9 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mary zipkas P. O. BOx 222 Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. Antone F. volinski, Jr. Middleton Road Greenport, New york 11944 Mr. William E. Adams, Jr. 770 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Barbara A. McGinness 820 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. & Mrs. Sam Campbell 23 Middleton Road Greenport, New york 11944 . Mrs. Bertha Martocchia 960 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. & Mrs. paul poerschke 27 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. & Mrs. Arthur E. Nichols North Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. & Mrs. Claudio Giovannelli 3 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 village of Greenport village Clerk 236 3rd Street Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. Robert Campbell, Jr. Bay Shore Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. Paul Corwin 31 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. John Mulhall 480 Clearview Avenue West southold, New York 11971 SCHEDULE B . . TOWN BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of JOHN COSTELLO, petitioner, For a Change of zoning Status in The Town of Southold for property located in said Town from "A" (Residential and Agricultural District) to "M" (Light Multiple Residence District). -------------------------------------x AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)ss.: Elizabeth Ann Stotsky, being duly sworn deposes and says: That deponent is not a party to the action, is over 18 years of age and resides at Riverhead, New York. That on the 15th day of August, 1985 deponent served the within Notice, by certified mail, return receipt requested, upon the owners of record, listed below, of every property which is adjacent to the property which is the subject of the above-captioned petition in accordance with the provisions of Section 100-152 of the Town Code entitled "Notice of proposed Change of zoning Classification", copies of the postmarked return receipts are attached hereto. Mr. & Mrs. Willard Crayton 390 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mrs. Bertha Martocchia 960 Middleton Road Greenport, New york 11944 Mr. & Mrs. James E. Chute 9 Middleton Road Greenport, New york 11944 Mr. & Mrs. paul poerschke 27 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 . . : Mary zipkas P. O. BOx 222 Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. & Mrs. Arthur E. Nichols North Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. Antone F. volinski, Jr. Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. & Mrs. Claudio Giovannelli 3 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. William E. Adams, Jr. 770 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Village of Greenport Village Clerk 236 3rd street Greenport, New York 11944 Barbara A. McGinness 820 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. Robert Campbell, Jr. Bay Shore Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. & Mrs. Sam Campbell 23 Middleton Road Greenport, New york 11944 Mr. paul Corwin 31 Middleton Road Greenport, New York 11944 Mr. John Mulhall 480 Clearview Avenue West S~~O~jij _ Eli abeth Ann totsky Sworn to before me this 15th day of August, 1985. JJ~ iAN.D~a..... Notary public CLAIRE FANEUA Notary Public. State of New York No. 62 ..00949 Ou8IiIled In Suffolk County Commllllon ElqIIra M8nlh 30. 1188 ,,{;~/l07 575 649 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL 1.0 INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT fOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) 1:8tat'hN"R~k8hols PO., Stale and ZIP Code 4 Green ort NYl194 Postage S CtHlified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showir\O . :i;l'tr.,' to whom and Date Oellveretr ' .,;4-. P 107 575 645 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL 'jO Ir.SURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED I.OT fOR IfHERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) . o "' . . .; ., ~ J oj 0: j Postage Ii ~ . Cerll/led Fee York 11 44 $ SpeCial Delivery Faa Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered " G ,. o G L ~ PO~lmark o , E 5 L ep 107 575 1;38 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COHRAGe PROVIDED NOT fOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) . ~ .' . ,:~ kas O. P.o.. State and ZIP Code NY 0: l;reen ort, ci Postage <h :i . 11944 $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Oilte N .. '" ~ .0 . U- S gj E ij ... 111 P 107 575 647 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURAI.CE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT fOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) . q .. . . .; ., 0> Cler <> 0: ci iii :i ., Certified Fee 11944 $ Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered ~ Return receipt ~ Date, and Ad .0 . ... g Postmark gj ~ If l/) Q. $ P 107 575 641 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED M NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOI NOT fOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) ... ent 10& o r. i ~ Willard c;j 0: ci iii :i . Certified Fee 11~ $ Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing 10 whom and Date Delivered N .. '" ~ .0 . U- S Postmark .. ., P 107 575 641! RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED" NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIO NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Rever.e) enlJO r Oc Mrs. Claudio S'r.., ~nd N~iovannelli $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fe. . Restricted Delivery Fee ; ~ N ... co ~ .0 ~ - .. P_107.575 b35 P 107 575 634 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAil (See Reve,.e) RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAil (See Reverse) 1 a J ~aQctNo U Miadleton Road ~nlto J:larbara . McGinness ~2'tt1frddleton Road P.O., Slate and ZIP Code e) 0: ci 0; :;; . s PG't~'etnpg~t~od1-lew York 11 44 Postage Postage s " -Ie;; CttrilfieJ Fe.e Cerlified Ft. Special Delivery Fee Special Delivery Fee , ' :',,\1: Restricted Oelivery Fee Restricted Dstivery F~ '. ,..:;. ,-,\ '. Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered ~ Return rec"'pt showing to whOm. ~ Dati, and Address of Oelivery .tl . ... g Postmalic ~ E ~ .. ... P 107 575 b39 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL 1;0 INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT fOR INTERNATIONAL MAil (See Reverse) P 107 575 633 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAil, NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOEO NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAil (See Reve,se) Mrs. James E. Ch te I ~ P.O., State and ZIP Codo ~ Green ort NY d Postage 0; :;; . s. Sam Carn bell Poslage York 11 44 s 11944 s . Curlilled Fee SpeCial Oelivery Fee Certified Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Special Delivery Fe. Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing 10 whom and Date D'livered ,.". .. = - .. :I - .tl . ... g III E o ... .. ... .tl . ... g III & .. ... P 107 575 b36 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED M NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOl NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAil (S.. Reve,.e) ... nltoA j r. ntone F. Voli~ i s~Ua'reton Road .. P.O., State and ZIP Cod. e) 0: d Postage 0; :;; tl Certified Fee , s SpeCial Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered P 107 575 6-50 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAl NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAil (S.. Reverse) I s~.,t ~f<1d let:n Road GO ~ P~e~~.~~t~ 11944 d Postage S 0; :;; . Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted DeUvery Fee Return Receipt ShOwing to whom and D.~. Dell~ N Retum receipt :I Oat.. and Add - .a TOTAL Posta . ... Postmark or P 107 575 643 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOEO NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAil (See Reve,.e) ! t t ~ . ~ SO.. SIl\le e~d l'P <:l>lIe , outnoJ.d New ~ Postage ; York s Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered ~ Retum receipt II Date. and Add' g TOTAL Poll. f Postmark or , , '" III 7] 3 l;l ~.WISOd ~ ." . !" ~ .. .. .. peJ8A!l8Q .,eo pue WOllM 01 OUIMOI.IS \d180QI:j UJnI8'=1 119 1 88:1 AJe^!IeQ pe\::llJIUtl 99;:t AJ9AII8Q leloeds s 1]1]611 ":I pamlJ8:) .- c !II .. :a p eOelSOd AN :po uaa.:t~ apo:) dlZ pUB ale,s '.~.d i : ew (as./aAel/ ees) llVri WNOIiVNH3iNI HOl iON 0301AOHd 3SVH3A03 33NVHnSNI ON 'IVW Q31:11J.1I30 110:1 J.dI30311 '[5'1 5105 100l( d P 107 575 b44 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED M NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIO NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAil (See Reverse) .. 58n110 ~ Mr. Paul Corwin i tt'e~c\'aleton Road .0.. State and ZIP Co<l<l... 119/ reen ort 1'1:1: q ... d postage <1\ :> . Certified Fee special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Oa1. Delivered N .. .. ~ ..; . ... l E o ... III 0. . - . ~ ,. " . . .