Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-38.-7-4 ! ! ! ?/ ! J. FREF'ERF~NCE¢ ZONI~G,CHAPTERIOO FROPd TH[{ COPE THE TOWN OF ~O~THOLD ZONE NI-I~ GENERAL F:E~-ID, ENC~ DIS'FNICT LOT COVERAGE; AL~WABLE: (1)ACCE SsOP'f ~LDG. TOTAL : '¢~ COV ERAGE: ~ ~ ~ -r.,7 7% : 400,706 0WELLING UNIT ALLOWABLE: ,'~OO0 ,[ (RdF: IO0, H6) PROPO%ED', , PARt<lNG: 5ET BACKS e,L~DG LENGTH ALLOWABLE~ 17-5~ FqA× LENGTH ~EtpARATION REQUIRED ; ~O' OR (R~F: IOQ,5Z) HEIGHT OF ELO6, REF, IQO.13,FORSLOPED ROOF ~EAN HEIGHT BETWEEN EAVE AND R~D~E TO FINISH GRADE ~ FRONT OF BLDG, PROPOSED', LENGTH; IZS' HEIGHT: 20' DISTANCE BE%WEEN BLDG': DIgT, BET, 5LDG, &A~Eg~, LIVABLE FLOOR ~N, ALLOWED tGOO AREA', PROPOSED', ~11 ~ ( STUDIO UNIT) OCF-~TR~T (REP, PARI~IN6 & HULk. SCHEDULE) PROPOSED~ ~;~CARS-DWF-LL. UN.T5 4" CARS -ACC~.~..~ ~hl~¢~. (,REF, PARI<IN~ & ~ULK SCHEDULE) FRONT YARD: REQUIRED; 50 ~ pROPO'~6 O: 50' ONE 51DE YARD:R~(~UIRED; ZO~ P ROPO~EP; ~O~ BOTHSIDEYAAD:REQUIRED~, AB' PROPOSED', lO0~ PROPOSED¢iO0~ HEIGHT:(RF~F, PARI<!NG ~, BU~k`. 5CHC-DULE ?RO POS 6~ SO t NGINEE RS'& ARCHITECTS '~IE:W YOR:K 'ClT~, 'NEW YbRK '100~9I HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr., Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr. GEORGE RITCH1E LATHAM, Jr. WILLIAM F. MULLEN, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE 7654938 January 17, 1983 Mr. Victor Lessard Building Administrator Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Cleaves Point Village Amended Site Plan Dear Mr. Lessard: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Plan- ning Board, Monday, January 10, 1983. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve as amended the site plan entitled Cleaves Point Village, dated November 11, 1982, subject to a one year review and an on site inspection by the Planning Board prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. If you require additional information, please contact our office. Very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD cc: David Kapell, agent By Susan E. Long, Secretary HENRY E. RAYNOR,$r..Chairman FREDER!CK EeOv~ JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jn GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. William F. Mullen, Jr. PZ¸ D TO D $outhold, N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE 765-1938 June 24, 1981 Mr. George Fisher Senior Building Inspector Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Fisher: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board at a regular meeting held June 22, 1981. APPROVAL of the last amended site plan with the exclusion of the marina for the subject of Emanuel M. Kontokosta. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Linda Kimmins, Secretary HENRY E. RAYNOR, Sr., Chairman FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI. Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 December 18, 1979 TELEPHONE 765-1938 Richard Lark, Esq. Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Lark: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board at a regular meeting held December 17, 1979. WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of a subdivision plat, entitled Minor Subdivision of E. M. Kontokosta, was submitted to the Planning Board on October ll, 1979, and an application fee of $30 was paid on October ll, 1979, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the said subdivision application and Plat at the Town Hall in Southold, New York, on November 14, 1979 at 8:00 p.m., and WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met by said subdivision Plat and application, Now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the application of E. M. Kontokosta for approval of said subdivision plat prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl, P.C. and dated September 25, 1979 be approved subject to the following modifications, and that the Chairman of the Planning Board be authorized to endorse approval on said subdivision Plat upon compliance by the applicant with such modifications as noted below. Modification of said Plat to show the following conditions of the Su£folk County Planning Commission: Richard Lark, Esq. December 18, 1979 1. No residential structure shall be located within 100 feet of the mean high water line. 2. No sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or. installed within 100 feet of the mean high water line. ® A conservation buffer or easement having a minimum width of at least 50 feet shall be established along the shoreline. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision and any of the lots shall be discharged directly into Gardiner's Bay. 5. No lot shall be subdivided in the future without the approval of the Planning Board. I am enclosing a copy of the Suffolk County Planning Commission letter. The Board was confused as to exactly what the Commission meant by the third condition. Therefore, I am writing a letter to them requesting clarification. Yours truly, Enaolosure Muriel Tolman, Secretary Southold Town 'Planning Board HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr., Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr. GEORGE PdTCHIE LATHAM, Jr. WILLIAM F. MULLEN, Jr. Southold, N.Y. II971 December 7, 1982 TELEPHONE 765-1938 Mr. Victor Lessard Building Administrator Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Cleaves Point Village East Marion Dear Mr. Lessard: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, November 29, 1982. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the site plan of Cleaves Point Village, located at East Marion, for certification, noting the following amendments:to the original site approved 6/22/81. 1. Addition of two tennis courts. 2. Addition of a chain-link fence. 3. Addition of driveways. 4. Addition of one car garages for each unit which will reduce parking area. (44 parking spaces required, 72 spaces proposed) 5. Reducti6n of one dwelling from 45 to 44. 6. Configuration of last quad to the North. The Board requested that the perimeters of the last quad be staked for a field review. Three copies of the site have been attached for certification. Very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Susan E. Long, Secretary HENRY E. RAYNOR. Jr., Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. William F. Mullen, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 July 10, 1981 Mr. Richard Lark, Esq. Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Lark: For your records, the following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board at a regular meeting held June 22, 1981. RESOLVED to approve the last amended site plan with the ex- clusion of the marina for the project of Emanuel M. Kontokosta. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD TELEPHONE 765- 1938 By Linda Kimmins, Secretary HENRY E. RAYNOR. Jr.. Chairman FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI. Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. SLaY Southold, N.Y. 11971 AugUst 7, 1980 TELEPHONE 765 - 1938 Richard Lark, Esq. Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Lark: For your records, the following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board at a regular meeting held June 30, 1980. RESOLVED to approve the site development plan for the Shipyard Lane Project as prepared by Kontokosta Associates, Engineers and Architects, said plan dated 2/7/79 with revisions on 8/6/79, 10/24/79, 11/28/79 and 6/5/80, subject to the recertification of the building inspector as to compliance with the Code of the Town of Southold. Mr. Kontokosta picked up the site plan from the office. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Muriel Tolman, Secretary MAYOR GEORGE W. HUBBARD TRUST£ES JEANN£ M COOPER GAlL F. HORTON DAVID E. KAPELL WILLIAM H. LIEBL£1N SUFr. OF UTILfflES JAMES 1. MON~ELL /lay o£ reen?o 't 236 THIRD STREET GREENPORT, SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK 11944 UTILITY OFFICE TEL. (516) 477-1748 FOWER PLANT TEL, (516) 477-0172 September 12, 1986 Mr. E. M. Kontokosta Kace Construction Corporation 43 West 54th Street New York, New York 10019 Dear Mr. Kontokosta: I am in receipt of a memo letter dated September 9, 1986, signed by you indicated your need of water from the public water supply to test a building housing 18 residential units. This project has no contract with the Village of Greenport. In my letter to you of June 27, 1986, I requested that you make the necessary applications for water service. Plans must be approved, materials must be approved and a contract signed between the two parties. If there is any taking of water, the Village fully intends to charge you with "Theft of Services". The Village Attorney, Mr. John Munzel and the entire Village Board are aware of your approach to circumvent a contract for water. If I can be of further service, please call. Very truly/~o~rs . ~ ..) James I. Monsel l Superintendent of Public Utilities JIM:hr CC: Mayor George Hubbard All Village Trustees Village Attorney Utility Committee Pau! Ponturo, S.C.H.D. Samuel McLendon, P.E. Victor Lasard, Southold Town Southold Town Planning Board/ KACE CONSTRUCTION CORP. 43 West 54th Street NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK 100].9 To LETTER (212) 5826100 Sept. 9 1986 Mr. James I. Monsell 18 Residential Units Supt. of Public Utilities ~b~ct Cleaves Point Commons Village of Greenport 236 Thir~ Street Greenport, NY 11944 CERTIFIED MAIL Dear Mr. Monsell: We are at a point in our construction schedule where water will be consumed for the purpose of testing our domestic water systems in nine of the eighteen additional residential units constructed at Cleaves Point in East Marion. We are therefore requesting that watermeters be installed for each of these units to allow for the determination of water consumption. Kindly advise us as to when you intend to comply with this reouest, since time is of the essence. Your expeditious installation of these meters will mitigate any damages resulting f~this delay. [] Please reply [] No reply necessary SIGNED PHONE: 7Z7-4700 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE JUN ~ ~ REC'I7 To Whom This May Concern: The ~,l Map of: Was Filed, 5-~-£ 3 /-'.~0 /S£~[ riled Number, Abstract Number, Township, ~Ot~/O/J Very truly yours, County Clerk Map Department Form No. 49 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONtS, JR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, .IR. T.",';,'~ V TUTi;; LL ROBERT .J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER Joseph H. Sawicki Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN RI-lAD- STATE RI-lAD 25 ¢~I-IUTHI3LD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 April 8, 1981 To: Re: N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Army Corps of Engineers Suffolk County Department of Health Southold Town Board ~r Southold Town Planning Board ~hold Town Conservation Advisory Council Appeal No. 2772 - Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta For a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance Location of Property: West Side of Shipyard La, East Marion Gentlemen: As you know, the Board of Appeals as lead agency determined the above project to be a Type I Action per the State Environmental Quality Review Act. At a regular meeting held April 2, 1981, the Board of Appeals also determined this project as proposed to have a significant effect upon the environment and requested that applicant submit a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Upon receipt and acceptance of the Draft EIS, copies shall be submitted to your office immediately. Enclosed herewith are copies of written correspondence from each of the agencies involved in this action. Yours very truly, CHARLES GRIGONIS, CHAIRMAN CG:lk Enclosures JR. MAYOR GEORGE W. HUBBARD TRUSTEES WILLIAM D. ALLEN JOSEPH M. PUFAHL WILLIAM H. LIEBLEIN ROBERT T. WEBB SUPT. OF UTILITIES JAMES I. MONSELL l lajae olr t'een?ot'g 236 THIRD STREET GREENPORT. SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK 11944 UTILITY OFFICE TEL. (516) 477-1748 POWER PLANT TEL. (5161 477-0172 March 30, 1981 $outhold Town Board of Appeals 8outhold Town Hall MainRoad Southold~ N. Yo llg?l Atten: Dear Mr. Grigonis: Re: Application of Emanuel Kontokosta for property located at Shipyard Lane, East Marion Charles Grigonis, Chairman Please find enclosed a copy of the letter dated March 4, 1981 from our consulting engineers - Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C. regarding the application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta for a special exemption to the Zoning Ordinance concerning proposed dredging and construction on Shipyard Lane~ Eest Marion. At a meeting of the Village of Greenport Board of Tn~stees held on March 16~ 1981 a motion was made and carried to forward a copy of this letter to the Southold Town Board of Appeals to be entered into their record.. J~,l:nc Enc. If you wish further information, please feel free to contact my office. [//? Very truly/ve~rs~ · ~ I. Monsell <_./ Superintendent of Utilities cc: Mayor & Village Board of Trustees Village Attorney~ Village Clerk H2M Corp. HOLZMACHER, McLENDON and MURRELL, P.C.~~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS and PLANNERS March 4, 1981 Board of Trustees Village of Greenport 236 Third Street Greenport, NY 11944 -&/ Bc:r of ppea s Re: Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta for a Special Exemption to the Zoning Ordinance West Side of Shipyard Lane, East Marion Gentlemen: As per your request, Me have reviewed the above referenced application for the dredging and construction of the 420' by 120' and 9' deep (6' below water) marina. In our review we have concentrated on the impact of.the dredging on the local ground- water and the village of Greenport Pumping Station No. 4. Pumping Station No. 4 is located approximately 4,000' north of the proposed marina. Chloride concentrations have been grad- ually increasing in the three wells at the site but to date have not surpassed the recommended 250 mg/1 limit. We believe the increasing chlorides are primarily due to the proximity of the wells to Fordham Canal and Dawn Lagoon. Well No. 4-6 is located approximately 2,000' from Dawn Lagoon and 2,500' from Fordham Canal. These inlets should never have been permitted, or if ~ermitted, not without the construction of a deep rela- tively impervious barrier to maintain water levels by restricting underground flow. To the north of the well'field lies Long Island Sound approximately 2,500' away from Well No. 4-8. Since the location of the proposed marina is substantially further away from the Pumping Station than the other bodies of existing salt water it will have no measurable impact on water levels at the Pumping Station. Although the marina will have no measurable impact on Pumping Station No. 4, it will have an impact on the ground- water in the immediate vicinity of the marina. The ground- water elevation Qf the northern end of the marina is approx- imately 6" above mean sealevel. This will be reduced t~ ~ sealevel with corresponding reductions in water levels near the marina. These reductions in water levels and depth to salt- ~ HOLZMACHER, McLENDON and MLq~I~I..L, P.C. / H2M C(~ RP. water may impact the ability to develop nearby parcels with on-site water supply systems. This potential impact can prob- ably be mitigated by supplying those parcels within the Greenport Water service area with public water and extending the service area to properties east of Shipyard Lane. This is feasible since a 6" main presently runs to the south end of Shipyard Lane. In June 1967, a report entitled "Town of Southold, Suffolk County, Long Island, NY; Investigation of Water Resources" by Malcolm Pirnie Engineers, recommended "the discontinuance of the approval of projects which include dredging channels inland from salt water estuaries or bays." This recommendation is as applicable now as it was then and any construction of these marinas, particularly those which cut deeply inland will have very detrimental effects upon the water supply in the area. Consideration may be given to opposing the construction of this proposed marina to deter continued proposed development of this sort. They can be very harmful to the already limited fresh water resource available. Please call if you wish us to do further study i~ this matter. Very truly yours, SCM/jm HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P. MAYOR GEORGE W. HUBBARD TRUSTEES WILLIAM D. ALLEN JOSEPH M. PUFAHL WILLIAM H. LIEBLEIN ROBERT T. WEBB SUPT. OF UTI LITIES JAMES L MONSELL Vi[[a e o[ gt'eenflod 236 THIRD STREET GREENPORT, SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK 11944 Mr. Charles Grigonis, Jr. Chairman, Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 UTILITY OFFICE TEL. (516) 477-1748 POWER PLANT TEL. (516) 477-0172 March 6, 1981 Dear Mr. Grigonis: The application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta to construct a boat marina at the foot of Shipyard Lane - East Marion has been forwarded to our Consulting Engineer, Mr. Samuel McLendon, P.E. for study and recommendation. The Village of Greenport, Water Department is very concerned about the digging away of land for this purpose aB it may have an adverse effect on the ground water reservoir. We are planning to drill a new public water supply well north of Shipyard Lane near our East Marion well field. If the above applica- tion were granted, we may mot be able to continue with our proposed new well field, which we feel is essential due to our near critical water supply. Would the Board of Appeals be kind enough to await the recommend- ation from our engineer before taking any action on this matter. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. ~,,n~T James I. Monsell Superintendent of Public Utilities JIM:nr CC: George Hubbard, Mayor All Village Trustees Allen Smith, Attorney Samuel McLendon, P.E., Engineer SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL Southold, N. Y. March 26, 1981 Mr. Charles Grigonis, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Grigonis: The Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council made an inspection of the property of Kontokosta on Shipyard Lane at East Marion on March 21, 1981. The group agreed with the' proposal if it can be shown that there will be no damage to the water table. Therefore, the board will reserve making a recommendation until they are shown where the fresh water table is and whether there will be a chance of salt water intrusion. They suggest test wells be put in at 100 foot intervals in the center line of the proposed marina. They also would like to know what is proposed to retain the soil to keep the mouth ~ open and what is proposed to retain the soil in the whole facility. Yours truly, FRANK CICHANOWICZ III, CHAIRMAN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL By Muriel Tolman, Secretary New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Regulatory ~fairs Bldg. 40, SUNY - B~om 219 Stony B~ook, NY 11794 (516) 751-7900 March l8, 1981 Robert F. Flacke Commissioner Charles Grigonis, Jr., ChaJ_rman SoutholdTownBoardofAppeals M~in Road - Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 A~'TN: T,inda Kowalski: Re: Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta for a Special Exception at the h%st Side of Shipyard Lane, E. M~rion In response to your letter of 2/17/81 please be advised that this Deparb~nt agrees with the Town Zoning Board designation as lead agency for the Type I action D~Dted abov~. Also, we consider the project as one which may adversely impact the enviror~nt and as an involved agency l~=c~a~nd the preparation of an Enviror~_n~l Impact Statement. The proposal to excavate 265' inland to construct a large marina has the potential to create decreased fresh water supply in storage and the possibility of salt water intrusion into nearby well supplies (see report - Town of Southold Investigation of Water Resources-June 1967, by Malcolm Pirnie Engineers). ~3nk you for the opportunity to o~m,~nt. Please send a oopy of the DEIS when available. Sincerely, DDR:cr cc: D. J. Larkin C. T. Hamilton A. S. Candela J. R. Renkavinsky Associate Environmental Analyst March 6, 1981 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. Mr. Charles Grigonis, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta, Property W/S Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Mr. Grigonis: A preliminary and cursory review of the above referenced revised applica- tion indicates that the total daily flow will exceed the Department's maxi- mum limitation of 30,000 gallons per day. Accordingly, this application would now require a sewage treatment plant and public water. By virtue of carbon copy of this letter to Mr. Konto- kosta, he is notified that revised site plans will be necessary in order to accommodate these needs. This office is in agreement that the Town of Southold should assume lead agency status. The writer will be in touch when revised site plans have been prepared and submitted to this office. Robert W. Jewell, Public Heal th Engineer General Engineering Services RWJ:cah cc: Mr. Emanuel M. Kontokosta TO~FN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR P.O. BOX 728 TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 December 28, 1982 TEL. 765-1802 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Subject: Cleaves Point Village Site Plan revision #2, dated 11/11/82 Gentlemen: With reference to item #1 of letter dated December 7, 1982 for certification of this site plan revision, please refer to certification dated November 5, 1982 for tennis courts. Item #2 (chain-link fence): the only chain-link fence indicated on site plan is shown as a backstop for tennis court, as such I would consider it to be an integral part of the tennis courts. The original approved site plan did not include the two sections of 8'-0" high stockade fencing as shown along front- yard area at south entrance. In the M-1 district there are no regulations for fencing. Fencing (screening) would come under site development, Art. III, Sec. 100-13q D (5) & (6). The one objection under zoning would be the closeness of the garages to dwellings. The 'Zoning Analysis' on Site plan states a distance separation of 20'-0". This complies to Art. V, Sec. 100-52 B. However, the site plan does not scale to 20'-0". It would be advisable to move garages on site plan to scale to a 20'-0" separation and show a setback dimension such as was done for distance separation of principal buildings. In the M-1 district, accessory uses are permitted under Art. V, Sec. 100-50 C (1). There are no regulations for loca- tion of accessory structures, this would come under Art. XIII, Sec. 100-134 D (1) for site development. Sec . EFH:ec This certification is made in accordance with Art. XIII, 100-133 C, relative to zoning requirements. Building & Housing Inspector xc ZBA APPEALS BOARD MEMRERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS. JR SERGE DOYEN, JR ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Southold Town Board of'Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 c~OUTHOLD. L.I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 November 29, 1982 Mr. David E. Kapell 143 Sixth Street Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Cleaves Point Village Condominiums Site Plan Revised November 11, 1982 Dear Dave: In reviewing the site development plan submitted by you on November 17, 1982, it will be necessary to receive the following before we may proceed on this proposal: 1. Amended permit from the D.E.C. pursuant to discussion with Mr. Dennis Cole; 2. Submission to the Building Department for their review and referral to our office for specifics (i.e. variances needed); 3. Amended Special Exception application forms; 4. Approval of the amended plan by the Planning Board. We will hold the copies of the site development plan in our file pending your filing of the Special Exception. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call. lk CC: Building Department Planning Board/ Yours very truly, CHA I ~AN ~ Southold Tow. Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 119'71 TELEPHONE (516) 766-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGON]$, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWlCKI November 23, 1982 Mr. David E. Kapell 143 Sixth Street Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Appeal No. 2956 Parkside Heights Co. Dear Dave: With reference to the amended maps submitted 11/17/82 in the above-entitled matter, please be advised that the follow- ing approvals are required before this board will be in a position to schedule this application for public hearing: 1. Approval of the amended plan by the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation; 2. Approval of the amended plan by the Southold Town Planning Board; 3. Approval by the Army Corps of Engineers. Please keep us advised regarding developments. Yours very truly, lk CC: Planning Board/ Building Department GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN DAVID E. KAPELL 143 Sixth Street Greenport, New York 11944 516-477-;~3¢~9403 REAL ESTATE ENTERPRISES CONSULTING SERVICES lqovember 17, 1982 l~r. Henry E. Raynor Cha.tzuan Southold To~n PlanninS Board To~n of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Dear Henrys Ny client, ~nanuel Kontokos~a, wishes to revise the approved site plan for his Cleaves Point Village Condominitns project on Shipyard Lane, East Nation. In connection with this I enclose the followins: 1. ~copies of the revised site plan. 2. Correspondence dated November 12, 1982 frouMr. Kon~okosta ~o you detailinS the revisions proposed. Please keep me posted of all actions concerning review of this matter. Sincerely, David E. Kapell as asent Enclosure8 KONTOKOSTA ASSOCIATES · ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS 43 west 54th street / new york city, new york 10019 / 212-582-6100 e.m. kontokosta p.e. gary rogers r.a. November 12, 1982 Mr. Henry E. Raynor,Jr,Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Re: Cleaves Point Village Condominiums Revised Site Plan Dear Mr. Raynor: Enclosed please find a revised site plan for your review and approval regarding Cleaves Point Village Condominiums on Shipyard Lane in East Marion. The revised plan shows the following changes: 1. Two tennis courts approved by the Planning Board on 8/30/82 have been incorporated on the overall plan 2. Propose the installation of an 8ft high fence at the southerly entrance to the project so as to screen the unsightly loading dock of the Oyster Factory. 3. Propose to revise the location and size of Bldg #3 and #4 so as to increase the setback from the shoreline and thus better con- form to the setback location of the buildings on the proposed project to the west. 4. Propose to provide one car garages for each of the units in Bldg #3 and #4 along with an additional driveway parking space for each of said units. This will increase the number of parking spaces for the entire project from 44 required to 72 actual spaces. 5. Propose to reduce number of units from the approved 45 to the proposed 44 dwelling units. Your expeditious review and consideration will be greatly appreciated. EMK/ck Enclosure- Four (4) copies of Site Plan TOWN OF SOUTHOLn OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR P.O. BOX 728 TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL. 765-1802 November 5, 1982 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Subject: Cleaves Point Village Certification of site plan amendment Gentlemen: In the M-1 Zoned District, accessory uses are permitted under Art. V, Sec. 100-50 C (1), however, this section is specific to the uses permitted and it does not mention tennis courts. This will certify that building permit can be issued a variance is necessary before a for this cons tTction. Y~ t r~//. Edward F. Hindermann Building & Housing Inspector EFH:ec Attch. HENRY E. RAYNOR, .Ir.. Chairman FP. ED---R!CM E CORD'?."! SAME6 WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI..Ir. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. Jr. William F. Mullen, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE 765-1938 June 9, 1982 Mr. E.M. Kontokosta Kontokosta Associates 43 West 54th Street New York, New York 10019 Re: Cleaves Point Village Shipyard Lane Dear Mr. Kontokosta: We are in receipt of your letter dated May 24, regarding approval of a tennis court within the above captioned property. We are unable to comply with your request until such time as we are in receipt of a denial-from the Building Inspec- tor's office. At such time, we will expedite whatever actions are necessary of the Planning Board. If you require additional information, please do not hes- itate to contact this office. Very truly yours, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Susan Eo Long, Secretary KONTOKOSTA ASSOCIATES · ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS 43 west 54th street / new york city, new york 10019 / 212-582-6100 e.m. kontokosta p.e, gary rogers r.a. May 24, 1982 Mr. Henry E. Raynor,Jr; Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Re: Cleaves Point Village Shipyard Lane Dear Mr. Raynor: Within the next 30 days, we will be in contact with the Building Department for the certificates of occupancy covering the 14 units in Building #1. Since we have completed the site work only in front of and surrounding the Bldg #1, the building inspector,based on our past experience, will not give consideration to our request unless prior approval and/or comments are received from the Planning Board. The site work that has been completed consists of the parking area for 18 cars, drai~nage for said parking area, and the site lighting all immediately adjacent and serving Building #1. It is our intention to complete the respective site work as each building is completed. In addition, we would like to amend th~ ~te~to include the installation of two tennis court~--~-or this pro.ct. The proposed location is indicated on the enclosed site plan along with the indication as to the extent of the site work which has been completed. We hope that your board can grant approval to the phasing of~the site work so as to allow the prospective buyers to occupy and enjoy their units during the coming summer months. The approval of the tennis courts will allow the residents the flexibility of other than water sports. Your favorable response would EMK/ck be greatly appreciated. Enclosure' COU~T¥ OF GUFFOL~ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES August 20, 1981 Mr. Emanuel M. Kontokosta Kontokosta Associates 43 West 54th Street New York, New York 10019 Dear Mr. Kontokosta: Re: Board of Review Hearing Shipyard Lane Project, Property W/S Shipyard Lane, East Marion, Town of Southold At the hearing held on July 29, 1981, you had an opportunity to presen~ your appeal of the department's ruling on the sub- application. In accordance with the provisions of Section 220 of Article 2 o£ the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, the determination of the Board of Review is as follows. Based on the information submitted, that individual septic tank leaching pool facilities meeting the design flow pro- posed in the new standards ~e accepted. Very truly yours, H. W. Davids, P.E. Director Division of Enviromnental Health HWD/lst cc Aldo Andreoli, P.E. .Town of Southold Planni~g Board HENRY E. RAYNOR. ,Ir., Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. Jr. William F. Mullen, Jr. TO ,D S $outh01d. N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE 765- 1938 June 10, 1981 Mr. Charles Grigonis, Jr., Chairman Southoid Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Grigonis: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board at a regular meeting held on June 1, 1981. With the exclusion of the marina on the proposed application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta, the Southold Town Planning Board concurs with the findings of the Southold Town Board of Appeals with re- gard to the Environmental Assessment Form filed with.you by the applicant. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Linda KJmmins, Secretary Southold Town Board o£ Appeals HAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONI$, JR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, .JR. T E R 7,',' TUT;::LL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER Joseph H. Sawicki To: May 21, 1981 Army Corps of Engineers N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Health Department ~thold Town Planning Board Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Re: Appeal No. 2772 - Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta For a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance Property: West Side of Shipyard Lane, East Marion Gentlemen-. Continuing on our letters of February 17, 1981 and April 8, 1981, please find enclosed the following documents concerning the above matter: (a) (b) Environmental Statement submitted date hereof; by the applicant herein same Amended Site Plan dated May 6, 1981 with Amended Special Exception application received May 13, 1981. It appears after reading the correspondence submitted by each agency involved that the portion of this project particularly of concern and which may adversely effect the environment (the impact of the dredging on local ground water) is the marina. Upon reviewing the amended site plan and related documents and being thoroughly familiar with the site in question, it is the general con- sensus of the members that the project as revised would not have any adverse effect upon the environment and provided of course they are able to meet all other department/agency requirements. Your thoughts are requested as soon as possible. Thank you for your time and assistance. Yours very tzuly, CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. CHAIRMAN Enclosures ~cc: Southold Town Board Village of Greenport TOWN OF 8OUTHOLD~ NEW YORK C AMENDED APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION NO. DATE .~..a. 3.....1...2..,......1981 TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, N. ¥. I, ~ Emanuel .M.. Kon.t.o._k..o..s..t...a.. of ._4..~....W~.~.t....~.4.t..h....~.t..r..~.e-.t. ..................................... Name Street and Number New York Municipality New York 10019 State hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE V SECTION 100-50 SUBSECTION B(3) & C(2) On December 24, 1980 the Petitioner filed with the Board of Appeals an application for a Special Exception copies of which with attached exhibits are on file with the Board. The Petitioner desires to amend the Site Plan dated November 20, 1980 deleting the marina and 48 residential units to provide for 45 residential units. The revised Site Plan dated May 6, 1981 is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. As in the previous application for a Special Exception all the residential units will be in the condominium form of ownership which will require approval from the Attorney General's Office, and contain a coffee shop, administration office and.swimming pool as accessory uses. EMANUEL M. ~KONTOKOST~ PET.I~TgNER ) ,~ ~ ............... ::vL ....................... i ....... CO~Y OF ~0~ ) / S~a~re/ Richard F. Lark, as Attorney ....... ~otary Public FORM ZB2 RICHARD F. [.,,ARK .~,']'~ORN~Y ,Ar [.AW May 18, 1981 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road SouthQld, New York 11971 ATT: Charles Grigonis, Jr., Chairman RE: Emanuel M. Kontokosta - Shipyard Lane Project Dear Mr. Grigonis: In connection with the above-captioned matter I am enclosing an Environmental Assessment Form, Parts I, II and III executed by me as attorney for Mr. Kontokosta. As to your request for a Draft Environ- mental Impact Statement concerning the marina project, be advised that Mr. Kontokosta has cancelled the preparation of same as he has previously withdrawn this portion of the project and sees no relevancy in completing the Impact Statement when it primarily involves the dredging and install- ation of the marina and its impact on the local groundwater supply. Kindly advise when this matter is placed on the Board's hearing agenda. RFL:bc Enclosure cc: Emanuel M. Kontokosta Very truly yours, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART A~NDED pRgJECT I~O~ATIO~ Shipyard Lane Richard F. Lark, Esq. Main Road P. O. Box 973 Cutchogue, New York 11935 Emanuel M. Kontokosta (:~e) 43 West 54th Street New York, New York 10019 ()..~. } (Stat-~) ~.a~ p~0~E: (212) 582-61QQ in condominium form of Qwnershio and cn~mm office and swimminq pQ01 as accessory uses. residential units 3. Total acr~ce o~ ~j~t ama: · Suouro~n , ~ur~! X, Fore~: ~Jnve-..e:a t ed ioad~, ~ui idizQs %~-. ~e eta~ed. Sand below top soil -- ~cr~s 1-1/2~cr~s 9_,...?,_!crts 7,7 tcr~s 6. Approximate percentage of' proposed project site with slopes: O-lO%] (~0 g~aCa~ -- ~. 7. ~s p~ject can:i~uaus ~a. ar c~ntain a building ar st~e lis~ed on the Ha~f~nal Register o~ P1~ces? Yes ' X No 8. Whet is the depC% :o :he water table? 3-15 .fee: g. ~ hunting or fishing appo~unities ~resently axis: in :he project area? Yes X No lO. ~es project site canCain any species of plan: or animal life that is identified as threatened endangered - Yes ~ Ilo, acceding to - Identify each species -- II. Are there any unique or unusual land fo~s on the p~ject site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geologic1 fo~ations- Yes ~qa. (Describe . ) 1~. Is ~e p~Ject site presently us~ by the ~unity or neighborhood as a~a - Yes ~ No. --.. 13. ~ the present site offer or include scenic views or vis~s kno~ to be impo~ant to.~e c~n(ty) . Steams ~i~in o~ can~iguaus ~a p~ec~ ~: a. N~ a~ stream and n~me a~ ~lve~ ~ whic~ i~ is ~ibuC~rz ~o~e f. g. h. 1S. Lakes; Pon~s, Wetland areas within or contiguous r~ project area: a. Ra~ Great Peconic Bay ; b. Size (in acres) .... unknown 16. What is ~e dominant lanJ use an~ zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of single family residential, R-~) and ~e scale of development (e.g. 2 story). _ I. Physi~l dimensions and s~la of p~ject (fill in dimensions ~s app~priate) Total contiguous acreage o~ed by ~mje~ sponso~ No~e acres, Project acreage developed: ~-l/3cres tnitially;~es ultimately. Project acreage ~ r~ain un~veloped 7.7 Length of project, In miles: ~/A (if appropriate) If p~.ect is ~ ~pansion of existing, indicate percent of ~pansion proposed: building'square foot- a~e N/A ; developed acreage N/A . N~er of effostreat parking spaces existing ~None Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 5 If residential: Number and type of housing units: · . OhO'Pokily Two Family Multi;la racily Condominium Initial 4~ Ultimat~ If: O~entation Neighborhood-Ct ty-Regional Estimated ~plc~ent Regional 40 pe:son~ .J~u:~ng const:uct~on) ..; proposed _ 72 - .Iupon completion of project} Comnarcial Industrial J. Total height of tallest proposed structure 22 feet. 11. Ho~v much natural mater1¢~ (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be from the site - None t~ns -- cubic yards. NOw many ac~s of vegeta'~ion (trees, shrubs, %~r°und covers) will be removed from site - N__o.n~acres. Will any mature foreb'c {over 1D0 years old) or other locally-tmportaot vegetation be removed by this project? Yet · X ,,jNO Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? .X Yes ..No If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months, (including demolition), If n~Jlti-.phased project: a. Total nt~ber of phases anticipated N/A ..No. ' - b. Anticipated date of co,.~encement phase 1 N/A. month year {including demolition) C. Approximate completion date final phase N/A month year. · d. Is phase 1 financially dependant on subsequent phases? mN./A .Yes Will blasting occur during const~'dction? Yes X No Ntmber o? Jobs generated: du~ing construction 4~0; after project is complete __6_ · Number of jobs eliminated by this project None. l~tll project require ~locatton of any projects or facilities? .Yes ~ X yes, explain: 12. a. Is suri~ace er subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? X Yes b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) K~w. ng~ . ..- c. If surface disposal nmr~ of stream into which effluent will be discharged N/A . . . 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? . _Yes .X No.. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year r'/eod plain? X Yes No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? ~es X No b. If yes, will an existtng solid waste disposal facility be used? N/A .Yes Xo c. If yes, give name: N/A ; location d. :.lill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? .; Yes X 16. Will projeot use herbicides or pesticides? ..____Yes X _.No 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Yes ~X .NO 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes X No lg. Will project ~esult. in an increase in energy use? X ...Yes ..No. If yes, indicate type(s) __ Fuel used for heating purposes If water supply is from we]ls indicate pure, ping capacity N/A gals/minute. To,al anticipated water usage per day_4~000 ~als/day. Zoning: a. What is dominant'Zoning classification of site? M-1 b. Current s~ectftc zoning classification of site M-1 c.- Is proposed use consistent with pre,eot zoning) Yes d. If OD, indicate desired :Doing N/A 20. NO -3- 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? Yes- b. Does project involve State or Federal funding C. Lo~al and Regional approvals: Approval Required (ies, rio) ~, Tovm, ~,)~l'~l No Xkt~XTown, X)~ Planning 8oar~ Y~s X~XTown, ~oning Board Y~ ~County Health Oepar~ent ~ Other local agencies Other regional agencies ~No ~tate Agencies- DEC ~ ?ederal Agencies C. IIdFO~'dAI'IO~(AL DETAILS Yes X ' No Submittal Approval (Date) (Oate) Site Plan ~n~ ~v~pti~/8% Attach any additional info.orion as may be needed to clarify your project. If the're are or may ~e any adve~e impacts associated with the'Rmposal, ple.~se discuss such impacts and the ~asures which can be ~fi,~manuel ~ gntokosta, Owner TI~ OAT~: May i6, i98i TOW~-~ OF SOUTh{OLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS}LEaNT - PART PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR ~AGNITUDE General Information (Read Carefully) - In completing the form the reviewer should be guided ~y the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonable) The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying teat an effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily sionificant. Any large effect must be evaluated in FART 3 to determine significance. ~y.identifying an ~ffec: in ~olumn Z simply asks that it be looked at further. - The Examnles provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the threshold of m~ that would trigger a response in col~rm 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any soeciFic project er si:e other examples and/or lower thresholds may be ,.-ore appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each qocality, will vary. ig~erefore, the examples have been offered as guidance. ~hey do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacta and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the i~portence of each question. INSTRUCTI0~IS (Read Carefully} a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PA~T 2. Answer Yes if there will be anz effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the eo~ro:riate ~ox {column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the imoact. If impact threshold equals :r ~ mod any example provided, check column ~. If impact will occur but threshold is lo~.;er than examoie, check column I. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact ~?~consider the imp. act as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less.t~am large magnitude, place a Yes in colu:rn 3. A ~lo response indicates that such e reduction is not possible. t. z. ~MPACT ON LAND WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL PROJECT SITE? Examoles that Would Apply to Column Z No )SMALL TO POTEntIAL CAN IMPACT MODEPATE LARGE REDUC2D BY IMPACT I~!PACT PROJECT C.HA ~IGE X NO YES Any constructioo on slopes of 1~% or greater, (15 foot rise per lO0 foot of length}, Or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Constroction on Land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Ye s No.. Construction of hayed ~arking area for I,S00 or ~ore vehicles. No ~nstruction on land ~here bedrock is exposed or le~eralIy within 3 feeC of existing ground surface. NO Construction chat will continue for more than 1 'year or involve NO £xcavation for mining purposes that would ~move core than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e. rock or soil) ~er year. ~o Construction of any new sanitary landfill. -5- Construction in a designated f~oadway. Other impacts: NO YES WILL THERE ~E AN EFFECT TO A~(Y UNIQUE OR U~;uSUAL ~.Nfl FOPJ'IS GO FOUN(7 0~[ l'~E SITE? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, geological forma- blahS, etc.) Specific land Forms: IItPACT ON WATER NO YES WILL PROJECI' A,FECT AI~Y WATER BOOY OESi~',ATEO AS .......... Q O PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15. 24, 25 of the Envir- onmental Conservation Law, Examples.. that Would Apply to Col~nn Oredging more than lO0 cubic yards of material From channel of a protected C=ns~ruction in a designated Freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: ¢, WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY ,IO,~-PROTECTED EXISTIN~OR"~! NO YE-~ BODY OF ,'!ATER? ......... GO Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 A lO~ increase or decrease in the surface area of any body ~ of water or ~ore than a lO acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds lO acres cf Other impacts: - NO YE-< WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUNOWATER flUALiTY? ' Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 " Project will require a discharge permit. Project requires use of t source of water +.hat does not have approval to serve proposed project. Project requires water sumply From wells with greater than 4S ge)Ions per minute pu~ping capacity. Construction or oneretion causing any contamination of a public water supply system. Project will adversely 'affect g~undwaCer. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site facilities which presently de not exis: or have inadequate capaci tr. Project requiring a Facility that would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Project will likely cause siltation or other discha~a into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Other Impacts: WILL P~OJECT ALTER OP. AINAGE FLO;I, PATTER,qS OR SU,qFACE !.~ATER :~0 RU:iOF.F? ................................................... £xamol% that ~:ould Aeply to Project would i¢oede flood water flows. Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ,,. Other impacts: _ INPACT ON r~ YES 7. WILL PROJECT AFFECT AIRQUALiT~? ....... ".-.: ............... G 0 Examoles that Would Apply tm Column 2 Prqject will induce 1,O00 or more- vehicle trips in any given ~ hour. Project will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton ~ of refuse per hour. Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than t0 million BTU's per hour. Other impacts: _ ~MP~CT O.~,' PLAN?$ AND ~N!m"AL~ · ,NO Y£~ WILL PROJECT AFFECT A~(Y THREATEIfDJ OR ~NDAMGER~ SPECIES? £xemmles that ~ould Apply im Column 2 Reduction cf one or more species listed on the ~:ew York or Federal list. using the site. over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wild- life habitat. . Application of Pesticide or herbicide over more than t)~ice a year other t~an for agricultural purocsas. Other impacts: WILL P~OJECT SU~ST~TIALLY AFF~_CT ~!O~I-T~REATE~iE-J ~R ENDA:~GE2ED S?ECiES? ...................................... ~xamole that would Apply to Column 2 Project would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish Or wildlife species. Prnject recuires the removal of more than lO acres of mature forest (~ver IO0 years in age) or otne~ locally import2nt vegetation. .©0 XO -© ~;~ALL TO POTF,~FFIAL CAN £IiPACT ~ODERATE ~RGE REDUCED BY IMPACT Ir~PACT PRQJ ECT CMA~(GE ) :$ ) ES I~'PACT ON VISUA~.~SCURCE WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT VIEW'S, ¥i'STAS OR mE VISUAL NO CHA.C~CTER OF THE riEIGHBORFOOD OR CO?NUN[TY? .............. V Examoles that gould Apply to Column An incompatible visual affect caused by the introduction of new materials, colors and/or furm. s in contrast Co :he surrounding landscape. A project easily visible, not easily screened, that is obviously different imm others amund it. Pmject will result in the elimination or major screening of scenic views or vistas known to be important to the area. Other impacts: ll. I~PACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCE_S WILL©PROJECT II,IPACT ANY SITE OR STRucTURE OF HISTORIC, NO YES PRE-HISTORIC OR PALEONTOGICAL I~PORTANCE? ................. ~(~ Vv Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project occurin~ wholly or partially within or contiguous to any facility or site listed on the National Register of. historic places. Any impact to an archeolegical site or fossil bed loceted within the project site. Other impacts: ~MPACT ON OPEN SPACE & REC~EAT)O!! WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE QUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING NO YES o. TURE OPEH SP C S on RECR TIO" L OPPORTU.ITiES? ...... Exammles that ~uld Apply to ¢~lu~ 2 The per~nanent fo~closure of · future rec~tional oppo~unity. A meier ~duc~ion of an mpem space i~ortant to the Other impactm: I~P~CT n~l TEqNSPORTATtOr[ WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO E~ISTING TP~qNSP~RTATiON SYSTemS? ............................................... Examol~[ that Would Apply to Column 2 Alteration of present patterms of m~vemenC of people and/or goods. Project will result in severe traffic problems. NO YES Other im:acts: ,, ~ POTE~ITIAL lARGE lHPACT CA~; I.~PACT.BE~ REDUCED PROJECT CH. ANOE; 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT TRE CHARACTER mF THE EXISTI~IG MO YES Examole thai: Would Apgly to ColL~:,n The population of the City, Town or Village in .,ihich the -- project is located is likely to grow resident human population. The municipal budgets ?or capital exoenditures or opera- ting services will increase by more than 5~ per year as a result of ~.his project. 'Jill involve any ~ermanent Facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove prime agricultural lands from cultivation. l~ne project wdll replace or eliminate existing Facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the co~m, unity. ~)evelopment will induce an influx o? a particular age group with special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future projects. Project will relocate 15 or more employees in one or ~ore businesses. Othe~ impacts: 18. NO ' IS Ti(ERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCER~iING THE PROJECT? .... ~--~ ~ V V Exa~,mles ~hat Would Apply to Column 2 Either government or citizens of adjacent co~nunities have expressed opposition or rejected the pro.ject or have not been contacted. Objections to the project from within the co~unity. JIF A:(Y ACTIO,9 IN PART 2 IS IDE~iTIFIED AS A. POTEHT!AL LARGE IMPACT O~ IF '¢OU.C~:;h'OT OETEPJ.II~IE l"HE HAG~;ITdDE OF [t. PAuT, PROCcE~, TO PART 3. DETE~LqATION PORTIOtIS OF EAF CO,~.IPL~--~EO FOR THIS PROJECT: PART I X~ PART Il X PART 3 ~ Upon revi~ of the ink.arian ~co~edon this ~F (Parts 1, ~ and 3} and ~nsidering both the magnitude and i~ortance of each impact, it is reasonably datelined that: The will resul~ in no major impacts and, there?ore, ~roject is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment. B. A1 though the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case ~ecause the mitigation m~asu~s described in PART 3 have been included as part of the proposed ?ojecc. C. The project will result in one or more major adverse !manors that cannot be reduced and may cause significant damage ~o the envi~nment. ilarF 116, l~l~ ~qna[ure bCPreoa~? (if ~fFe~nt from ~sponsibla officer) ~Emanua~ M. ~ontoKos~a PREPARE A DIEGATIVE 0ECLAi~ATION _--© PP. EPARE A ,~EC~AT!'IE DEC~P~ATION PREPARE POSITIVE Dc.~.,,~,,A~zO,, PROCEED ~ITH ~gnature cf Responsible OYficiai in Lea, Agency P~in~ or type name of responsible offi~i in Lead Agency 14. W~LL pROJECT AFF-CCT T~E CO~.DIUNITIES SOURCES OF F~J~L,]R Examoles that Would Apply to Column Project causing greater than S% increase in any for~. of energy used in muni¢ipa)ity. Project requiring the creation or extension of an transmission or sueoly system to serve m~re than 50 single or ~o family residences. Other impacts: ~MPACT OH NOIS~ WILL FHERE BE OBJECTIONABL~ OOORS, NOISE, GLARE, VZ?ATIQN NO YES or ELECTRICAL DIS~dRSA~C~ AS A R£SULT OF THiS PROJD.'T? .... Examoles that I(ould Apoly to Column 2 Blasting within l,~O0 Feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur r:utinely emote than one hour ~er day}. Project will or, duce operating noise exceedin~ the local a~bient' noise levels For noise outside of strictures. Project will remove natural barriers that would act ss e Other impacts: IMPACq', 0~) HE~d & HAza~D.S NO Examoles that Would Apply th Col~ 2 P~jec: will c~use a risk of explosion or release of h~z~rdous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chenille, radiatlan, etc.) in the evenC af accident or upset conditions, or there will be a ch~nic Iow level dis~a~e or e~ission. P~ject that will msult in the burial of "haz~r~:us wastes" {i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, r~dioact!ve, irritating, infectious, etc., includin~ wastes t~aC ar~ solid, s~:i-solid, liquid or contai~ ~or~qe Facilities for ~ne million or ~ore gallons of liquified natural gas or ot~er liquids. Other imoacts: TOWN OF $OUTHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPO~%TANCE OF IMPACTS, Part 3 is prepared if one or,more impact or effest is considered to be po:entially large. The amount of writing necessary to answer Part 3 may :e determine~ by answering :he question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I ~laced in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of my decisions? .~. iNSTRUCTiONS Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in'Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. Describe {if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than iarge impact by a pro- ject change. Based on the inforr~.atien available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is ~portant to the minicipaltty (city, town or village) in w~ic~ the project is located. To answer the question of importance, consider: The probab)lity of the impact or effect occurring The duration of the impact or effect Its irreversibility, including permanently los: resources or val~es Whether the impact or effect can be contr~lIed The regional consequence of the impact or effect Its potential divergence from local needs and ioals Whether known objections to the project ap~ly to this impact or effect. O~T~YI~'~TION OF SI~IIFICANC~ An action is considered to be sisnificant if: One {or m~re) imaact above, is imeortan~.. is determined to both la~e and its (their) consequence, based on the review PART !II ~ATE?dE~(TS (Continue on Attachments, as needed) Th±s p~oject ±s a Tgpe II act±o~ anO w±11 have no aOve:$e ±mpact on the e~v±:onment. The domestic ~ate: ±s to be suppl±e~ bg the Y±11agg.O~.G:een~o~t ~ate: Sgstem. The San£ta:g D±sposal system w±11 be des±gned to meet the S~££olk ¢ountg 5ealth Depa:tment :egu±:eme~ts. The ~:oposed ~$e o~ the g:o- ~e:tg con£o~m$ to the ex±st±rig ~on±~g o~ the $outhold ~o~n Maste~ Plan. · Southold Town Board of Appeals APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, ,JR. TERRY TUTH:LL ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER Joseph H. Sawicki To: May 21, 1981 Army Corps of Engineers N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Health Department ~thold Town Planning Board Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Re: °Appeal No. 2772 - Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta For a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance Property: West Side of Shipyard Lane, East Marion Gentlemen: Continuing on our letters of February 17, 1981 and April 8, 1981, please find enclosed the following documents concerning the above matter: (a) (b) Environmental Statement submitted date hereof; by the applicant herein same Amended Site Plan dated May 6, 1981 with Amended Special Exception application received May 13, 1981. It appears after reading the correspondence submitted by each agency involved that the portion of this project particularly of concern and which may adversely effect the environment (the impact of the dredging on local ground water) is the marina. Upon reviewing the amended site plan and related documents and being thoroughly familiar with the site in question, it is the general con- sensus of the members that the project as revised would not have any adverse effect upon the environment and provided of course they are able to meet all other department/agency requirements. Your thoughts are requested as soon as possible. Thank you for your time and assistance. Yours very truly,~ CHARLES GR~GONIS, JR. CHAIRMAN Enclosures cc: Southold Town Board Village of Greenport RICHARD F, LARK May 18, Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road South~ld, New York 11971 ATT: Charles Grigonis, Jr.~ Chairman 1981 RE: Emanuel M. Kontokosta - Shipyard Lane Project Dear Mr. Grigonis: In connection with the above-captioned matter I am enclosing an Environmental Assessment Form, Parts I, II and III executed by me as attorney for Mr. Kontokosta. As to your request for a Draft Environ- mental Impact Statement concerning the marina project, be advised that Mr. Kontokosta has cancelled the preparation of same as he has previously withdrawn this portion of the project and sees no relevancy in completing the Impact Statement when it primarily involves the dredging and install- ation of the marina and its impact on the local groundwater supply. Kindly advise when this matter is placed on the Board's hearing agenda. RFL:bc Enclosure cc: Emanuel M. Kontokosta Very truly yours, C TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK. C .~vr~NDED APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION NO. TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, N. Y. I, kVA~ Emanuel...M_:...K_on..t..o.~.o..s...t...a. ~ 43 W~.s.t .54th S.~..e...e.~ .................................... Name Street and Number New York Municipality New York 10019 State hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with ~he ZONING ORDINA/~CE ARTICLE V SECTION 100- 50 SUBSECTION B(3) & C(2) On December 24, 1980 the Petitioner filed with the Board of Appeals an application for a Special Exception copies of which with attached exhibits are on file with the Board. The Petitioner desires to amend the Site Plan dated November 20, 1980 deleting the marina and 48 residential units to provide for 45 residential units. The revised Site Plan dated May 6, 1981 is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. As in the previous application for a Special Exception all the residential units will be in the condominium form of ownership which will require approval from the Attorney General's Office, and contain a coffee shop, administration office and swimming pool as accessory 6ses. EMANUEL~_~//~.jKON~OKOST~ PET~'IONER .......... ...... COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) Richard F. Lark, as Attorney · 12th · Ma 81 Sworn to~h~ ....~.9..~ ............ d~ of ............... ~ ............. , 19 ................ ........ .......................... ~otar¥ Public FORM ZB2 . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRO5%~ENTAL AS SESS-~LENT PART AbLENDED PROJECT I ~TE OR~{AT IO .N.. Shipyard Lane Richard F. Lark, Esq. Main Road - P. O. Box 973 Cutchogue. New York 11935 Emanuel M. Kontokosta 43 West 54th Street New York, ~ew York 10019 ~m~P~(~: (212) 582-6100 office and swimminq PO~i as accessory u. ses. (~hysi~l s~tt!ng of over3]l ~j~, boc~ develec~ ~nd undavelco~ ar~as) ], ~neral ~arac:sr ~f L~e l~d: Gene~ily unifo~ ;;ooe X , , Agr~cul:u~ , (Srier'ly descr%be type of ~rojec-. 3r ac:~on) 45 residential units condominium form of ownership and omf~ :hm~: m~m~:*~me~ e~_r'..q ar r'ill) ;ca:;, ~ui idir, q$ t~_. ~eqeta~ed, Sand below top soil -- :c:~.s 9_,_2_-'cr'-s 7,7 ~¢res 7. 8. g. 10. Apprexi.r, ate percentage of prapesed project site with slopes: 0-1O'~l (lO '~; 10-15~' ~, 15: or greater -- ~. Is pre jeer contiguous to. or contain a buildingor site listed on the ~(ati~nal Register or. Historic Places? Yes ' X No What is the depth to the water table? 3-15.?est 09, hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes X,.,.No l~es project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered - Yes X lie. according to - Identify each species -- Il. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - - Yes ,X ,.'Ne- (Qescribe lZ. Is the preject site presently used by the cor..~.,unJt¥ or neigh.borhood as an open space or recreation area - Yes 2[ ,~o. - ~ :'~ 13. 0oes the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important t0.the c~aunJty? 7es X ,'lo ... .... 1¢. Streams within or contiguous ta project area: a. Nam. e of stream and name ot' river to '~hich it is tributary None lc. Lakes~ Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous ta project area: a. Name Great Peconic Bay ~ b. Size (in acres) __ unknown 16. What is the dominant lanJ use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.~. single family residential, R-Z) and the scale of development (e.g. Z story). . - ' Industr±al and comme~c±al PR0,1ECT DE$CRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions end scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) Total contiguous acreage o~rned by project sponsor None ~cres. Project acreage developed: 1-1/~cres initially;1-1/2ecres ultimately. Project acreage to remain undeveloped. ?. ? . . Length of project, in miles: N/A (if apprepKiate) If prelect is an expansion af existing, indic, ate percent of expansion proposed: building'square a~e N~A · $ developed acreage N/~ Numar of off-str~-~--t perking spaces existing None ,~axi~u~ veh'icular trips generated per hour 5 If residential: Number and type of housing uni~: Initial ; proposed 72 - (upon completion of prO~ect) One'Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium 4~ Ultimate C~ercial Orientation ~(erighborhood-Ci t¥-Rsgional Regional Estimated Empl oy~ent 40 persons (d~:±ng construct±on Industrial Total height of tallest proposed structure 22 feet. much natural mater (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be re~o( g. lO. 11. Jfrom the site - None t~ns " How many ac~s of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ~round covers) will be re.moved fro~ site - No.ne_..acre$. 'Jill any mature fore'~c (over ID0 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Yet . X Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that re~oved during construction? X Yes If single p~,~ase project: Anticipated period of construction 12.___~months, (including d~,olition). If multi-.phased pFoject: a. Total number of phases anticipatedN/A No. · - b. Anticipated date of co~ence~ent phase 1 N/Amonth demolition) ¢. Approximate cOr. mpletion date final phase N/A ~nth . d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phases? Will blasting occur during conetr~Jction? ,.Yes X No N~nber of jobs generated: during constroctio~ 4~0; after project is complete G Number of jobs eliminated by this project None. Will project require relocation of ~ny projects or facilities? Yes X Xo. If yes, explain: cubic yards. year (including 12. a. Is surface or subsur(aoe liquid waste disposal involved? X Yea ~o. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) ¢. If surface disposal n~e of strea~ into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, stream, s, bays or other surface wa(arrays be increased or decreased by proposal? ..Yes ~ No. . . ' ' 14. IS project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain?_X Yes ~N° 1S. a. Ooes project involve disposal of solid waste? .Yes X No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste dis;osal facility be used? N/A Yes c. If yes, give n~e: _ N/A .,; location , d. Hill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ; Yes X 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? . .Yes X 17. Will project routinely produce odo~ {~re than one hour per day)? Yes X Ho 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local a~.btance noise levels? Yes X No lg. Will project ~esult. in an increase in energy use? X Yes ~o. If yes, indicate type(s) Fuel used for heating purposes If water supply is f~m we]ls indicate puz. ping cepacity N/A gals/minute. Total anticipated water usage per day 4t 000 ~als/day. ~oning: a. What ts dominant'arming classificacion of site? M-i b. Current specific zonicg classification of site _M-1 ¢.. Is proposed use coqsis:ent with ~resent zoning? Yes d. If no, indicate desired zoning N/A No -3- 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal par~iC required? Yes- X _2No b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? ¢. Lo~al and Regional approvals: Approval Required (ies, No) (Type) Yes X No Submit:al Approval (Date) (Oats) X~, Tom, k~:~)~_~ No l~XTown, X~X~ Planning ~oard Yes Site Plan ~Xrown, Zoning Board Y~S~ .:v~=~q ~ ~v~pti~/81 ~ County Health Other local agencies Other regional agencies ~o_ ~tat~ Agencies- DEC ~deral Agencies r. INFOP~VATIG)G%L O~TAILS DATE: Attach any additional infareat(on as ~ay be needed to clarify your projact. If there are or may )~'e any adverse impacts associated with the ~r~posal, ple.~Ise discuss such impacts and the ~asures which ~an be .ken ~o mitigate or avoid~/~~:~.~ ~ /Y . ~~man~el' 5~ K~ntokosta, Owner TITL~ May ~6, ~98~ TOW~ OF SOUTDtOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSblE~N~T - PART PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR ~AGNITUDE General Information (Read Carefully) - In Completing the form the reviewer should be guided ~y the queation: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. - IdentiFying that an effect will be potentially large (column Z) does not mean that it is also necessarily sioni?icant. Any large effect must be evaluated in 9ART 3 to determine s~gniftcance. ~y.identifying an ~ffe:: in column ~ simply asks that it be looked at further. - The ~xammles provided ere to assist the reviewer ~? s~ewing types of effects and wherever possible the threshok o? magn~tuo~ that would trigger a response in col:~m 2· The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations· But, ?or any soeci~c project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds · ~y be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. . - ~ach project, on each site, in each 9ocalit¥, will vary. Tlmrefore, the examples have been offered as'~utdance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacta and thresholds to answer each question. - · - The number of examples per question does not indicate the i~portance of each question. INS19~UCTION$ (Read Carefully} b. Answer each o? the 18 questions in PART 2. Ans'~er Yes if there will be ~ny effect. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the a~or:eriate box (colum~ 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the imaact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check eolu¢,n ~. If i~pac: will occur but threshold is lo~er ~gan examele, check column 1. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impac~ ~Qo~consider the imp. act as potentially large and proceed to PA~¥ 3. o~ .... change in the project to a lees.t~an large I? a potentially large impact or effect can be r ..... d by a magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. t. Z. NO YES IMPACT ON LANO WILL~THEg.~ BE AN EFFECT AS A I~E_SULT OF A PHYSICAL CFA:;G2 T0 P.~0J ~CT SITE? Exa.r.~les that :~ould Apply to Column ~ NO Yes ©® Any construction on slopes of 1~% or greater, (lg foot rise per I00 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Const.'-dction on Land where the depth tm the water table is less than 3 feet. No Construction of oaved ~arking area for l,~OO or ~cre vehicles. No r~nstructicn on lane where bedrock is exposed or ~erally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. NO Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more than one phase or stage. No Excmvation for mining ~urposes that would r~ve core than 1,000 tons of natural ,,-mterial {i.e. rock or soil} ~er year. N° Construction o? any new sanitary landfill. S)!ALL TO POTE!(TIAL CAN IMPACT BE ,!,DO [P. AT[ LAP, GE R[DUC2D 8Y IMP~C i IMPACT PROJ~CT CHAIqG:: X No No Construction in a designated fgoodwa¥. Other impacts: YES WILL THE~E 5E AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR Ut;USUAL POU~ID O~l THE SITE? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, geological forma- lins, etc.) Specific land form. s: NO YES WILL PROJECt AFFECT At, Y WATER BOOY OES,~',ATEO AS .......... ~ OJ PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, ~¢, 25 of the Envir- onmental Conservation Law, Examples that Would Apply to Col~..n ~ ' 0redging more than 100 cubic yards o¢ ,-~terial from channel o? a protected stre~. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: 4. WILL pROJECT AFFEC~ ANY ~ION-PROTECTED ~ISTI)IG ORM~3 NO YES BOBY OFI':ATER? ........................... . ......QO Examoles that Would Apply to Column ~ A 10~ increase or decrease in the surface area of any body '" of water or more than a lO acre increase or decrease. Construction o? a body of water that exceeds l0 acres o? Other impacts: ~0 YES WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROU)IOWATER QUALITY? ' O C Examnles ~at Would Apply to Colun~q ~ " Project will require a discharge pe~it. Project requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed preject. Project requires water supply from wells with greeter than 4S gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or o:eration causing any contamination of a public water supply system. Project will adversely'affect greundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site Co facilities which presently do not exis~ or have inadequate capacity. Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 20,0D0 gallons per day. Project will likely cause siltation or other discha~e into an existing body of water to the ~ ~ will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. UP,CT Other [mpafta: WiLL pROJECT ALTE.q 8p.A[NAGE FLOH, PATTEP.DS OR SUP.:ACE !"ATER :(0 YES RUt,OFF? ......................... QO Examole that ~ould Aoply to 6ol~m 2 P~ject would imD~de flood waCer ~ows. P~ject is likely to cause substantial e~slon. P~ject is incompatible wi~h existing drainage patterns. Other impacts: " IMPACT ON AIR, ~ YES 7. WILL PROJECT A,F,CT AIR QUALITY? ..... :.".--~ ............. '~'G 0 Exam:les that Would A~ply to Column 2 Project will induce 1,O00 or more_ vehicle trips in any given Project will result in the incineration elm are than 1 ~ of refuse per hour. Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed lbs. per hour or a heat source groduoing more than lO million BTU'$ per hour. Other impacts: P...~aCT Examples %ha: Would Apply to Reduction of one or more species lis%ed on the ?~ York or Federal list, using the site. over or ~ear sit~ found on the site. Re¢oval of any ~ortio~ of · critical or significant w~ld- life habitat. Ao~lic~tion o¢ Pesticide or he~icide over ~ than Other impacts: ~_. PROJECT SU~STJ~T~ALLY AFF~_CT ~!O:t-T~R~ATE~i:"~ 12 :Nb,,..~c~..~ SPECIES? .................................. Example that t.~ould Apply to Column 2 Project would ~ubstantlally interfere with any r~sident or mlgraCory fish or wildlife species. Prnject reouires the removal of more than )0 ~cres of mature forest (~,~er IOQ years in age) or etna- locally i:port~nt vegecation. ~oLL TO POTFJ.tTIAL CA~! IIlPACT ERATE LARGE REDUCED IMPACT If~PACT P P. OJECT CHA~IGE ) '.S ) ES Y£S 10,- ll. 1Z. IPPACT 0~! VISUAL PESGU~CE WILL THE PPOJECT AFFECT VIEW'S, ¥I'$TAS OR THE VISUAL NO CHA.~ACTER OF T~E ,EL:HGO~. OOD OR COb!~U~t[TY? ........ · · ---. Ex,males that t,'ould Apply ta Column ~ An incompatible visual affect caused by the introduction of new materials, colors and/or form,.s in contrast to the surrounding landscape. A project easily visible, not easily screened, that is omviously different lmm others amund it. Project ;~ill result in the elimination or major screening of scenic vi~s or vistas knov:n to be important to the are~. Other impacts: INPACT aN HISTORIC RESOUPCE~ Exam~le~ that Would Acply to Colum Z Project occuring wholly or partially within or contiguous to any facility or site listed on the National ~egister of. historic places. Any impact tn an archeologic~l site or fossil bed located within the project site. Other impacts: · ~IPAC"F ON OPEN SPACE & REC.:.EATIO!( .' WILL TH.E PROJECT AFPECT THE OUA~ffITY O~ QUALITY OF EXISTING NO YES OR FUTURE oPE)I SPACES OR RECREATIO~IAL OPPQRTU~IITiE$? ...... ~ ~ Kxa~eles tha'~ ~Inuld Apply to C~'lum ~ l'he pertinent foreclosure of a future recreational oppor~.unity. A major r~_duction of an open specm important to the community. Other impact~: IMPaCT nN T~ANSPORTAT!O~! 13. WILL THgE BE A~I EFFECT TO EXISTING TP~NPCETA?iO~i SYSTB~S? ............................................... Examoles that Nould Apply to Column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movamenC of people and/or goods. Project will result in ~evere ~raffic problems. NO YES Other impacts: ~ALL TO YES ~ POTEtffIAL LARGE I~4PACT [CAI.,<tPACT .BE j , R~'gUC.~. ~)y, . I PROJECT CH.A,~OE. j 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHARACTER ~F TH~ EXISTI~;G ~0 CO.~,g,~ ................... Ex~mu]e that Would AppJy to CoJ~n 2 The ~opu]atlon o? the City, Town or Village in which the ~ project is located is likely ~o gr~w by more than ~ residen: human popula:~on. ~e municipal budgets for capital exmenditures or opera- ting services will ~ncre~se by more than 5: per ?ear as a result of :his p~jec:. Will involve any :e~anen: ?acility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultur~! district or remove prime zgricultural lands f~m cu]tivation. ~e p~ject will replace ar el~mlnate ex~sting facilities, st~cture$ or areas of historic impo~ance to the co,unity. Development will induce an ~n~ux of a pa~icular g:up with special needs. P~jec: wi41 ~et an Jmpo?~nt precedent for future Project will relocate 15 or more employees in one or ~re bustnes~s. Othe~ ~mpacts: 18. NO ' YE: IS THERE PUBLIC CO~T~OVERSY CONCERNI:~G l~HE PROJECT? .... Examoles ~hat Would Apply to Column 2 Either government or citizens of adjacent co~unities ..... have expressed opposition or rejected the project or have not been contacted. Objections to the project from within the community. .~ "- J IF A:(Y ACTIO,9 I)~ PART 2 IS IOE,qTIFIED AS A /POTENTIAL LA~GE IMPACT OR IF YOU CA~i:~OT ~ETEPJ.II.E J THE MAGi;Il"dOE 0~, IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART · D?TE.~HI:;ATION PORTIONS OF FAF CO,qPLEI'ED FOR THIS PROJECT: PART I ~ PART Il × PART 3 ~ Upon review of the information reco~ed on this ~AF (Parts 1, and 3) and considerin~ both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: The :roject will resul~ in no major impacts and, ~ ~?~" is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment. " ~ "h the oroject could hzve a significant environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation m~asures descrlbee in PART 3 have been in¢!uced as part of the proposed C. The broject wilt result in one or more major adverse imoacts chat cannot be reduced and may cause significant dsmage to :he env(r~nment. ....................... ~ ~ 'Slenature oCPreoar~? (if qirfer, ent from office:,) PREPARE A ~IEGATIVE DEC~RATIOH ___© PREPARE A NEC~AT!'I~ OECLAP. ATION · R.. A,~. ?OSiTIVE D~.u.~RA~O, PROCEED ~gnature of Responsible O:fficial in Agency )4. I~P~¢T ON E.~IERGY WILL PROJECT .AFFECT THE COf!f,IUNITIES SOURCES OF ?J--L ,:P, NO YE.~ E;~RGY SUPPLY? ....................................." ' " 'GO Exammles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project causing greater than S~ increase in any for~. of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of an e~er~y transmission or sunni? system to serve ~re than )0 single or ~o family residences. Other impacts: ~PACT ON NOIS~ 15. WILL ~HE~E BE OBJECTIQf(ABLE OOORS, )tOISE, GLARE, VZ?~A?ION NO YES or ~IECTRI~AL DIS~dR~ANC~ AS A RESULT OF Examoles that t(ould Apnly to Column ~ Blasting within 1,~00 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely ~more than one hour per P~ject will ~r~duce operating noise exceeding the local a~bienC noise levels for noise outside of strictures. Project ~ill remove natural barriers that would ac~ ~s a Other impacts: IMPACT, 0)! HEA~ & ~AlSPDS NO YES Exa~nles that Would Apply to Column ~ , Project will c~use a risk o? explosion aP release of ~zardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of acciden~ er upset conditions, or tne~e will be a chronic low level discharge or e~ission. Project that will r~suIt in tho burial of "hazardous wastes' {i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., includin~ wastes that ere solid, s~mi-solid, liquid or ccntain gases,) ~-, S~ora~e facilities for ~e million or ~re gallons of liquified natural gas or ot~er liquids. ~.ALL TO POTE.qTIAL .CA~( r: . 2~CT ~ ~OOEP. ATE LARGE RE~UC-~O BY IMPACT ' I!IP~CT PROJECT CHA,'~GE TO$~ OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PAI{T III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Part 3 is prepared if one ormore impact or effe:t is considered to be poCentially large. The ~J:ount of writing necessary to answer Part 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I ~laced in this record sufficient inform, orion to indicate the reasonableness of my decisions) INSTRUCTiO~IS Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in'Column 2 of Part 1. 2. Briefly describe the impact. Oescribe (if applicable) how the t.q~act might be mitigated or reduced to a less than iarge impact by · pro- ject change. Based on the inform, orion avaiIable~ decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important to the minicipality (city, town or village) in ~hic~ the project is located. To answer the question of importance, consider: l'ne probability of the impact or effect occurring The duration of ~e i~act or effect Its irreversibility, including pemanently los: resources or values Whether the impact or effect can be controlled The regional consequence of the impact ar effect Its potential divergence from local needs and ~oals Whether known objections to the project apaly to this impact or effect. is determined tm both la~e and its (their) consequence, based on the review DE'F~H.~T!0N OF SI~IIFICA~ICE An action is considered to be significant if: One {or m~re) impact above, is imoortant. PART !II ~AT~4E~ITS {C~ntinue on Attac)!man:S, as needed) This p~o~ect is a ~ype II act±on and will have no aclve~se ±m~act on the env±~onment. The domest±c wate~ is to be supplied'by the Villag~,o£.G~ee~po~t Wate~ System. The San±ta~y Disposal system will be designed to meet the Suffolk County Health Department ~equi~ements. The p~oposed use o~ the ~o- pe~ty con£o~m$ to the ex±sting zoning o~ the $outhold ~own Maste~ Plan. RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW CUTCHOGUE* NEW YORK 1193~ May 12, 1981 Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road - Town E&ll 8outhold, New York 11971 ATT: Charles Grigonis, Jr., Chairman RE: Dear Mr. Emanuel M. Kontokosta Shipyard Lane Property, East Marion, Grigonis: On December 24, 1980, the Petitioner, F~anuel Kontokost& filed with your Board an application for a Special Exception ~nder the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Southold. The inordinate delay in time in obtaining a public hearing on this application has caused considerable economic hardship to the Petitioner. Therefore, he has decided to amend his application by deleting the marina portion of this application and reducing the number of residential units from 48 to 45. Accordingly, I am enclosing an emended application for a Special Exception and six copies of the revised Site Development Plan dated May 6, 1981. In order to expedite matters I have also forwarded a copy of this letter and the revised Site Plan to ~he Planning Board and Building Inspector for their con~nents. I do 'not believe it is necessary for the revised Site Plan to have an Environmental Impact Statement as ~he Board did not require such a statement when they granted the original Special Exception for 28 apartment units, 21 motel units and the accessory coffee shop on January 17, 1980. In any event I would appreciate your scheduling this for a public hearing at the earliest available time. Very truly yours, RFLIbc Enclosures Emanuel M. Kontokosta Planning Board Building Inspector RiChard F. Lark RICHARD F, I.ARK May 12, 1981 Southold Town Building Department Town Hall - Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATT: George H. Fisher, Senior Building Inspector RE: Emanuel Kontokosta Shipyard Lane Property, East Marion, N.Y. Dear Mr. Fisher: I am enclosing a copy of the revised Site Plan which has been submitted to the Southold Town Board of Appeals in the above-captioned matter. I would appreciate your reviewing same and forwarding any comments to the Board of Appeals with a copy to me. Very~truly ~our$~;~ ~ichard F/Lark RFL:bc Enclosures cc: Emanuel Kontokosta TOWN OF SOUTh<OLD, NEW YORK AMENDED APPLICATION FOR %PECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION NO. DATE ..M.a.Y.....1.,~.~.....19 81 TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, N. Y. Name Street and N~ber ...... ~...~9~ .................................................................. New York 10019 M~icipality State hereby apply to THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE V SECTION 10 0- 5 0 SUBSECTION B(3) a C(2) On December 24, 1980 the Petitioner filed with the Board of Appeals an application for a Special Exception copies of which with attached exhibits are on file with the Board. The Petitioner desires to amend the Site Plan dated November 20, 1980 deleting the marina and 48 residential units to provide for 45 residential units. The revised Site Plan dated May 6, 1981 is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. As in the previous application for a Special Exception all the residential units will be in the condominium form of ownership which will require approval from the Attorney General's Office, and contain a coffee shop, administration office and swimming pool as accessory uses. EMANUEL M. KONTOKOST~k~ PET~IONER ) ~$ B.y ................. ;/. ................................ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) , Slgnature,~' R±~'hard F. Lark, as Attorney Sworn to,4his ....~.~.~..h. ............ dayo~ '. ........ ..M,~. .............. 19...~.~:. ....... Notary Public FORM ZB2 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, .IR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER Joseph H. Sawicki Southold Town Board o£Appeais MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD. L.I.. N.Y. 119"71 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 April 8, 1981 To: Re: N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Army Corps of Engineers Suffolk County Department of Health Southold Town Board ~hold Town Board Planning Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Appeal No. 2772 - Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta For a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance Location of Property: West Side of Shipyard La, East Marion Gentlemen: As you know, the Board of Appeals as lead agency determined the above project to be a Type I Action per the State Environmental Quality Review Act. At a regular meeting held April 2, 1981, the Board of Appeals also determined this project as ~proposed to have a significant effect upon the environment and requested that applicant submit a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Upon receipt and acceptance of the Draft EIS, copies shall be submitted to your office immediately. Enclosed herewith are copies of written correspondence from each of the agencies involved in this action. Yours very truly, CHARLES GRIGONIS, CHAIRMAN CG:lk Enclosures JR. HENRY E. RAYNOR, Jr.. Chairman JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. William F. Mullen, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 April 1, 1981 TELEPHONE 765- 1938 Mr. Charles Grigonis, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Grigonis: The Planning Board has reviewed the proposal of E. M. Kontokosta to construct a marina at his property at the end of Shipyard Lane in East Marion. It appears that the depth of nine feet as proposed is excessive. The primary concern of the board would be salt water intrusion into the fresh water interface. It would appear that if the orientation of the basin were turned 90% this possibility would be minimized. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Muriel Tolman, Secretary Telephone 516-765-1938 BOARD Soutt 11971 JSTEES March 6, 1981 Mr. Charles Grigonis, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Grigonis: The trustees feel as a body that the application for a marina at the bay at the end of Shipyard Lane is unacceptable because of problems with the canal to the west and the public safety as far as drinking water goes. Yours truly, ANNA T. HATAIER, PRESIDENT BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES By Muriel Tolman, Clerk SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL Southold, N. Y. March 26, 1981 Mr. Charles Grigonis, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. G~igonis: The Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council made an inspection of the property of Kontokosta on Shipyard Lane at East Marion on March 21, 1981. The group agreed with the proposal if it can be shown that there will be no damage to the water table. Therefore, the board will reserve making a recommendation until they are shown where the fresh water table is and whether there will be a chance of salt water intrusion. They suggest test wells be put in at 100 foot intervals in the center line of the proposed marina. They also would like to know what is proposed to retain the soil to keep the mouth and open and what is proposed to retain the soil in the whole facility. Yours truly, FRANK CICHANOWICZ III, CHAIRMAN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL By MUriel Tolman, Secretary SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL Southold, N. Y. March 26, 1981 Mr. Charles Grigonis, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Grigonis: The Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council made an inspection of the property of Kontokosta on Shipyard Lane at East Marion on March~21, 1981. The group agreed with the' proposal if it can be shown that there will be no damage to the water table. Therefore, the board will reserve making a recommendation until they are shown where the fresh water table is and whether there will be a chance of salt water intrusion. They suggest test wells be put in at 100 foot intervals in the center line of the proposed marina. They also would like to know what is proposed to retain the soil to keep the mouth ~ open and what is proposed to retain the soil in the whole facility. Yours truly, FRANK CICHANOWICZ III, CHAIRMAN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL By Muriel Tolman, Secretary New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Regulatory Affairs Bldg. 40, SUNY - Poc~ 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794 (516) 751-7900 March 18, 1981 Robert F. Flacke Commissioner Charles Grigonis, Jr., Cha~ Southold Town Board of App~ls M~in Road - Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 A~TN: T,inda Kowalski: Re: Application of ~nanuel M. Kontokosta for a Special Exception at th~ West Side of Shipyard Lane, E. Marion D~r Ms. Kowalski: In response to your letter of 2/17/81 pl~e be advised that this Depazbt~nt agrees with the Town Zoning Board designation as lead agency for the Type I action noted above. Also, we consider the project as one which may adversely impact the envzronment and as an involved agency reccmnend the preparation of an Enviror~nsntal Impact Statement o The proposal to excavate 265' inland to construct a large marina has the potential to create decreased fresh weter supply in storage and the possibility of salt water intrusion into nearby well supplies (see report - Town of Southold Investigation of Water Resources-June 1967, by Malcolm Pirnie Engineers). Thank you for the opportunity to o~m~nt. Please send a copy of the DEIS when available. Sincerely, DDR: cr cc: D. J. Larkin C. T. Hamilton A. S. Candela J. R. Renkavinsky David Deaidaer Associate Enviror~=_ntal Analyst March 6, 1981 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. COMM IS$IONIER Mr. Charles Grigonis, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta, Property W/S Shipyard Lane, East Marion Dear Mr. Grigonis: A preliminary and cursory review of the above referenced revised applica- tion indicates that the total daily flow will exceed the Department's maxi- mum limitation of 30,000 gallons per day. Accordingly, this application would now require a sewage treatment plant and public water. By virtue of carbon copy of this letter to Mr. Konto- kosta, he is notified that revised site plans will be necessary in order to accommodate these needs. This office is in agreement that the Town of Southold should assume lead agency status. The writer will be in touch when revised site plans have been prepared and submitted to this office. Very truly yours, Robert W. dewell, t°.E. Public Health Engineer General Engineering Services RWJ:cah cc: Mr. Emanuel ~. Kontokosta MAYOR GEORGE W. HUBBARD TRUSTEES WILLIAM D. ALLEN JOSEPH M. PUFAHL WILLIAM H. LIEBLEIN ROBERT T. WEBB SUPT. OF UTILITIES JAMES 1. MONSELL /i[[a Te of 236 THIRD STREET GREENPORT, SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK 11944 Mr. Charles Grigonis, Jr. Chairman, Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road $outhold, New York 11971 March 6, 1981 UTILITY OFFICE TEL. (516) 477.1748 POWER PLANT TEL. (516) 477-0172 Dear Mr. Grigonis: The application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta to construct a boat marina at the foot of Shipyard Lane - East Marion has been forwarded to our Consulting Engineer, Mr. Samuel McLendon, P.E. for study and recommendation. The Village of Greenport, Water Department is very concerned about the digging away of land for this purpose as it may have an adverse effect on the ground water reservoir. We are planning to drill a new public water supply well north of Shipyard Lane near our East Marion well field. If the above applica- tion were granted, we may not be able to continue with our proposed new well field, which we feel is essential due to our near critical water supply. Would the Board of Appeals be kind enough to await the recommend- ation from our engineer before taking any action on this matter. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. amenStI. Monsell Superintende of Public Utilities JIM:nr cc: George Hubbard, Mayor All Village Trustees Allen Smith, Attorney Samuel McLendon, P.E., Engineer H2M Corp.~ HOLZMACH ER, McLE NDON and MURRELL, P.C.~~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS and PLANNERS March 4, 1981 Board of Trustees Village of Greenport 236 Third Street Greenport, NY 11944 .c2r of oi $oul ol Re: Application of Emanuel M. Kontokos~a for a Special Exemption to the Zoning Ordinance West Side of Shipyard Lane, East Marion Gentlemen: As per your request, ~e have reviewed the above referenced application for the dredging and construction of the 420' by 120' and 9' deep (6' below water) marina. In our review we have concentrated on the impact of the dredging on the local ground- water and the Village of Greenport Pumping Station No. 4. Pumping Station No. 4 is located approximately 4,000' north of the proposed marina. Chloride concentrations have been grad- ually increasing in the three wells at the site but to date have not surpassed the recommended 250 mg/1 limit. We believe the increasing chlorides are primarily due to the proximity of the wells to Fordham Canal and Dawn Lagoon. Well No. 4-6 is located approximately 2,000' from Dawn Lagoon and 2,500' f~om Fordham Canal. These inlets should never have been permitted, or if ~ermitted, not without the construction of a deep rela- tively impervious barrier to maintain water levels by restricting underground flow. To the north of the well'field lies Long Island Sound approximately 2,500' away from Well No. 4-8. Since the location of the proposed marina is substantially further away from the Pumping Station than the other bodies of existing salt water it will have no measurable impact on water levels at the Pumping Station. Although the marina will have no measurable impact on Pumping Station No. 4, it will have an impact on the ground- water in the immediate vicinity of the marina. The ground- water elevation qf the northern end of the marina is approx- imately 6" above mean sealevel. This will be reduced to ~ sealevel with corresponding reductions in water levels near the marina. These reductions in water levels and depth to salt- HOLZMACHER, McLENDON and P.C,/ H2M CORP. water may impact the ability to develop nearby parcels with on-site water supply systems. This potential lmpact can prob- ably be mitigated by supplying those parcels within the Greenport Water service area with public water and extending the service area to properties east of Shipyard Lane. This is feasible since a 6" main presently runs to the south end of Shipyard Lane. In June 1967, a report entitled "Town of Southold, Suffolk County, Long Island, NY; Investigation of Water Resources" by Malcolm Pirnie Engineers, recommended "the discontinuance of the approval of projects which include dredging channels inland from salt water estuaries or bays." This recommendation is as applicable now as it was then and any construction of these marinas, particularly those which cut deeply inland will have very detrimental effects upon the water supply in the area. Consideration may be given to opposing the construction of this proposed marina to deter continued proposed development of this sort. They can be very harmful to the already limited fresh water resource available. Please call if you wish us to do further study i~ this matter. Very truly yours, SCM/jm HOLZMACHER, McLENDON & MURRELL, P. Officers MAYOR GEORGE W. HUBBARD TRUSTEES WILLIAM D. ALLEN JOSEPH M. PUFAHL W1LLIAMH. UEBLEIN ROBERT T. WEBB SUPT. OF UTILITIES JAMES I. MONSELL of, reen?od 236 THIRD STREET GREENPORT. SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK 11944 UTILITY OFFICE TEL. (516) 477-1748 POWER PLANT TEL. (516) 477-0172 March 30, 1981 Southold T~;n Board of Appeals Southold Town Hall Main Road $outhold, N. Yo 11971 Dear Mr. Grigonis: Re: Application of Emanuel Kontokosta for property located at Shipyard Lanes East Marion Atten: Charles Grigonis, Chairman Please find enclosed a copy of the letter dated .March 4, 1981 from our consulting engineers - Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.C. regarding the application orE manuel M. Kontokosta for a special exemption to the Zoning Ordinance concerning proposed dredging and construction on Shipyard Lane~ Edit Marion. At a meeting of the Village of Greenport Board of Tnlstees held on March 16, 1981 a motion was made and carried to forward a copy of t~his letter to the Southold Town Board of Appeals %o be entered into their record.. If you wish further information, please feel free to con~ac% mV office. J~.I:nc Eno. Very truly~rs, ..~ /? ~Super'Jm~nSde~tMo?Seultillities cc: Mayor & Village Board of Trustees ViLlage Attorney, Village Clerk Southold Town Board of Appeals TELEPHONE {516} 765-1809 APPEALS r~OARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, JR. T~ ROBERT J. DOUGLASS ~ERARQP~OF~RING~R. osepn M. TO: Arm~ Corps of Engineers N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Department of Health Southold Town Board uthold Town Planning Board uthold Town Conservation Advisory Council Village of Greenport Board of Trustees RE: Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta for a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance Location of Property: West Side of Shipyard La, East Marion. DATE: February 17, 1981 Gentlemen: Pending before the Board of Appeals is an application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta for a Special Exception for approval of: (1) a 58-boat man-made marina approximately 420' 'by 120' and 9' deep; (2) 20 additional residential units rather than the 21 motel units which had originally been granted during January 1980; (3) accessory building to be located at the head of the marina to be utilized as a coffee and maintenance shop and offices for the complexes; (4) swimmingpool at the head of the marina'--all to be constructed on premises located at the west side of Shipyard Lane, East Marion, as shown on the attached Amended Site Plan. This agency has determined itself lead agency and has determined this project to be a Type I Action per SEQRA and likely to require an environmental impact statement. At this time you are respectfully requested to provide any informa- tion available which might identify possible significant environ- mental effects, the position you will be taking as an involved agency, and your comments regarding the subject application. February 17, 1981 Re: Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta If you have any questions information, please do not Kowalski at 765-1809 (alt. regarding this matter or wish additional hesitate to contact our Secretary, Linda 765-1802) between 9:00 and 4:00. Thank you for your consideration. Yours very truly, CHARLES GRI~ CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS CG:lk Enclosures: Amended Site Plan Environmental Assessment Short & Long Transmittals Application for Special Exception Related Documents  TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~ SHO ' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT R~ INSTRUCTIONS: (a) In order to answer the questions in this short EAF it is assumed that the preparer wi1! use currently available information concerning the project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected that additiona! studies, research or other investigations wi1! be undertaken. (b) If any question has been answered Yes the project may be significant and a completed Envlronmental Assessment Form ks necessary. (c) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is not sign~flcant. (d) Environmental Assessment 1. Will project result in a large physlcal change to the project site or physicaZly alter more than i0 acres of land? ............... . ....... x Yes No 2. Will there be a major change to any unique or unusual land form found on the s£te? ........ Yes ×No 3. Will project alter or have a large effect on existing body of water? ..................... Y~s ×No 4. Will project have a potentially large impact on groundwater quallty? ..................... Yes ×~o 5. Will project significantly effect drainage flow on adjacent sites? ..................... __Yes ×No 6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? ......... Yes ×No 7. Will project result in a major adverse effect on air quality? ............................. Yes ×No 8. Will project have a major effect on visual character of the community or scenic views or v~stas known to be important to the community? Yes ×No 9. Will project adversely impact any s~te or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance or any site designated as a critlcal envlronmental area by a local agency? ............................ Yes ×No ZO. Will project have a.major effect on existing or future recreational opportunities? ......... × Yes No 11. Will project result in major traffic problems or cause a major effect to existing transportation systems? ....................... Yes. ×No 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable , odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrlcal disturbance as a result of the project's. operation? ....... --- .---.. -- ..-... --.-.- Yes × No 13. Will project have'any'impact'°n'Public'heaZth'- or safety? .................................... Yes × No 14. Will project affect the existing community by directly causing a growth ~n permanent population of more than 5 percent over a one year period or have a major negative effect on the chara~'~'er of the community or neighborhood? ................................. Yes × No 15. Is there public controversy concerning the . project? ..................... .~ ...... '. Yes. × No PREPARER'S SIGNATUR ~ : h as Attorney REPRESENTING Emanuel M. Kontokosta DATE December 22, 1980 APPENDIX A EAF EHVIRO;(MENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART I ~roject Information NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant ...effect on the environment. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as Dart of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete PARTS 2 and 3. it is expec:ed that como)orion of the EAF will be dependent on infor$~ation currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investtqation. If information requiring such additional work is unavaibble. so indicate and specify each instance. NAHE OF PROJECT: ADDRESS AND NA)tE OF APPLICANT: ($treet~ NAME ANO ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different) (PLO.) (State) (Zip) BUS~NESS PHONE: ~Y~-- ~ --~/~0 (P.O.) ey) {Zip) DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: (Briefly describe type of project or action) (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTIDU - Indicate N.A, if not applicable) A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas) V/ Generally uneven and rolling or irregular General character of the landi Generally uniform slope __ Present land use: Urban , Industrial .-- , Commercial , , ,, Agriculture__, Other Total acreage of oroject area: ~acres, Aaproxtmate acreage: Presently After Completion Meadow or Brushland f. ~:~ acres ~'_~acres Suburban ., Rural ~ Forest Hater Surface Area Forested acres acres Unvegetated (rock, earth or fill) Agricultural .acres acres Roads, buildings Hetland (Freshwater or and other paved Tidal as per Articles surfaces ~4, 25 or E,C.L.) Presently After Completion ~ .acres /_-~_ac-es g/~/78 Other (indicate tyne) acres What is ~redominant soil type(s) on project site? .... .~___/~'.~_ ~o~-~ 7-r_~ ~'J)~C a. Are the~e bedrock outcroppings on nrn,i~ct'site? .... Yes .... V/~No t. I~hat is depth to bedrock? .... ./~/7~_.~._, ............. (!n Feet) 7. 8. g. 10. 11. Approximate oercentage of orooose~roject site with slooes: O-lO~ /C~(P~: %; 15~ or greater Is project contiguous t~p,. or contain a buildino or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? Yes What is the deeth to the water table? feet OD hunting or fishing opportunities oresently exist in the project area? Yes )//'NO ODes p~oJect site contain )ny species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endanqered- Yes .~/ ;lo. according to - Identify each species -- 'e there any unique or unu~al land forms formations - Yes V' No. (Describe on the ~roject site? (i.e. cliffs, qunes, other geological 12. Is the project site p, xesently used Dy the community or neighborhood as an open soace or recreation area - Yes V' No. 13. ODes the prese, lat site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? Yes ~v/No 14. Streams within o~ contiguous to project area: a~,'Name Of stream'and name of river to which it is tributary 15. Lakes. Ponds. I~etland areas within or 6bnttguous to project area: a. llama , ; b. Size (tn acres) 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g... single family residential. R-2)and the scale of develol~ment (e.g'.'2 story). .~"Yv'~$~x~_ P?,OJ ECT DESCRIPTION . ~, .-., ~ .',. ,.:~.,, lr.;~.Phgs!;a) ,~t~nsions and scale of project ·(fill in dimensions as appropriate) ~:a.-:TOt~lr~onttguous acreage owne~ by project s~onsor ff~. acres. b. ~ ~Je~t acreage develooed: ~e~ acres Inttiall y; ~, ~acres ulti~tely. ~c. P~Ject acreage to remain uhdevelooed ~- ~ d. tength of project, in mile~: ~ (if appropriate) e. If p~Ject Is an expansion of existS, indicate percent of expansion ~roposed: building square foot- ~age,- '~ ; developed acrea~ge ~. ~ . H~er~of off-strut parking~'s~ace~ e~i~inq ~ i proposeo ~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour /~ .(upon c~letion of project) 'h. If :~¥'dential: '~mber and type of ,hoosing units: '; ~L.:- 'One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium ' ~ ' i. ' :)etghborhood-C~y-Regional Estimated Emoloyment Total height of tallest nroposed s~ru~t~re ----~ ~,~..feet. -2- How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed From the site - tons cubic yards. How many acres of veqetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site Will any mat{ire forest"~er lO0 years' old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project'? .Yes .t/' ~re there ~y plans for re-vagetation to ~eplace that re~ved during construction? /Yes ~;o IfJsing!e'p~ase' project: Anticipated period of construction /~ months, (including demolition). ~f mult~k~h,~s~d ~rojectF:~. a. TotJl n~ber of phases anticipated /T/~o./ b.' Anticipated date of co~encement ~hase I ~month ~year (including de~l i tion ) c. ADprox(mate completion date final phase ~nth year. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent phases? Yes · ~ill blasting occur.during const6b'ction? ~Yes~ N~ber of jobs generated: during construction ~00; after project is complete Numar of Jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? __Yes I//~o. If yes, explain: 16. 17. 18. lg. 20. 21. 22. Is surface or subsurface liqutd waste disposal involved? ~Yes No. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) ~'~-~--~-~ c. If surface disposal name of stream into w~tch ~fluent will be discha~ed . Will surface area of existin~Q~'lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by ProPosal? ~/~ Yes Is ~roject or any )ortion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? V/Yes No a. Does DroJect involve disposal of solid waste? Yes b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disQosal facility be used? ~ Yes c. If yes, give name: ~ -- : location d. Uill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes ~No Will project ~utinely ~roduce odors {more than one hour per day}? Yes ~NO Will .project. produce operating no,se exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes ~/~o Will project result ~ an increase in energy use? ~/~Yes __No. If yes, indicate type(s) If water suOply is from wells indicate pumping capacity ~l~ gals/minute. Yes _--V/'~No Total antt~t~a~{ed water usage per day ~/~_~o gals/day. Zoning: a. I.~hat is dominant zoning classification of site? ~. Current specific zoning classification of site c IS proposed use consistent ,vith nresent zoning? d. If no, ind?cate desireo zoning ___ . - .... Approvals:' a. Is any Federal permit required? Yes l//~No b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? Yes c. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required (Yes, No) (Type) Submittal Approval (Bate) (Bate) City, Town, Vlllage Board City, Town, ~ Planning Board City, Town, Zoning Board~/~,~EAc~ City, County Health Department Other local agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies ~/~.~ . Federal Agencies C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as r~ly be needed to clarify your project. adverse impacts associatqd with the~posel (>lease disc~ impacts taken to mitigate or avot.d the_~ PREPARER' S SIGNATURE~ TITLE. REPRESENTING: ~/ ~ ~. If there are or may be any and the measures which can be -4- ~/~ Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: W. ILL 2.. THERE BE AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL LANQ FOIUiSj~/ ,.~' FOUND ON THE SITE? (i.e. cliffs dunes ecological Forms- /. t$ons, etc.) ~ Specific land forms: Ii!P~ACT ON WATER 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANy WATER BODY DESIGNATED AS ... PROTECTED? {Under Articles 1S. 24. 25 of the Envir- onmental Conservation Law. E.C.L.) j Examples that Would Apply to Cot~nn 2 y~:~ Dredging more than IOQ cubic yards of material from ~ channel of a protected stream. ~'~aConstruction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ~ Other impacts: NO YES Examples that Would Apply to Column 2' A 10% tnc~ase or decrease tn the surface area of any body of water or more than a IO acre tnc~ase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds lg acres of surface area. Other i~acts: i m lv :!CALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IttPACT BE aOOE~LATE LARGE REOUC£O BY I)IPACT IHPACT PROJECT CHANGE S ) 5. tiILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUNDHATER nlIALITY? /~ Examples that ~lould Apply to Colu~q 2 ~ Project will require a discharge permit. __ P~ject requires use of a source of water that does not have aporoval to serve proposed project. ~ Project requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. -- Construction or operation=causing any contamination of a public water supply system. ~ Project will adverse)~ affect groundwater. __ Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or hsve inadequate capacity. ~ Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 2A,OO0 gallons per day. __Project will likely cause sil{atton or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART II Project Impacts and Their Maqnitude General Information {Read Carefully) - In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying that an effect will be potentially large {column 2) does not mean that it is al so necessarily significant. Any large effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. By identifying an effect in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. - The ~ provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be an_~y, effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the Size of the impact~en consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. IMPACT ON LAND 1. WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE TO (J~') PROJECT SITE? VV Examples that Would Aoply to Column 2 ~ Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. ~Y Construction on Land where the depth to the water table is less ~/t~ than 3 feet. ronstruction of naved oarkinq area ¢or 1,?nO or more vehicles. ~ C~nstruction on land where bedrock is exoosed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. ~ Construction that will continue for more than 1 vear or involve more than one phase or stage. ~ Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than l,OOO tons of natural material {i.e. rock or soil) per year. ~ Construction of any new sanitary landfill. -5- S)~ALL TO POTENTIAl CAN IMPACT BE MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE :~ILL PROJ£CT ALTER DRAINAGE FLO' PaTT£~qS OR oU,OFF? ................................ ....... '..: ... Project would i~ede flood water flows, Project ts incomoatible with existing drainage uatte~s. 7. UILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY? ..... r~O/Y~ES Examples that ~ould Apply to Column 2 __ Project will induce 1,OOO or more vehicle trips in any giver hour. -- Project ~ill result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per neut. -- Project emission rate of a11 cont~p[n~n_t.~_w, il] ~xcee~ S ' lbs. uer ~our or a heat s~-e ~roduclng more than 10 mt111on BTU's Per hour. Other tmoacts: ~ACT ON PLAHT5 ~ND ANX~I~ WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENEO OR ENDANGERED SPECIES? ~xamples that Would Apoly to Column ~ Reduction of one or moro species listed on the llew York or Federal list, uslng the site, over or near site or found on the site, Removal of any nortlon of a crtttcal or sioniftcant wJld- life ~abiG)C. An~licatt~n of Pesticide or herbicide evermore than tv,ice a year other t'~n ~oea[ip:¢altar~l puri~es' Other i~pacts: SI~ALL TO POTENTIAL CArl UIPACT BE ~ODERATE LARGE REDUCED DY i?PtCT ' Pa CT PROJECT CHA?~GE ) m m m !fILL PROJECT SUBSTAITIALLY AFFECT PON-THREATE:IED OR NO//~ES ENDANGERED SPECIES? ............... ' ........................ Examole that Would Aoolv to Column ~ ~ ~ __ Project would SUbstantially interfere wit~ any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species. __ Project reouires the removal of core than lQ acres ~f mature forest (over lOA years in ape) or other locally imoortant vegetation. -7- I"OACT 0'~ V1St'~L ~ESOU~CE 10. UILL TNE PoOJFCT AFFECT.¥1EtIS. VISTAS OR THE V!SUAL CHAgACTER OF Tile ~IEIGHBORHQOD OR CO~'l!lITV? .............. Examnles that tlould Apply tn Column 2 _.~,~n incompatible visual affect caused by the introduction /,, of new materials, colors and/or forms in contrast to the surroundtn~ landscaoe. A oroject easily visible, not easily screened, t)lat is obviously different from nthers around it. Project will result in the elimination or major screening of scenic views or vistas knovm to be important to the area. Other impacts: SMALL TO nOTEI(TIAL CAN II~PACT BE I~PACT I'~PACT PROJECT CHANGE m m NO IMPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURC~ ll. WILL PROJECT I)iPACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF NISTORIC, PRE-HISTORIC AR PALEQNTOGICAL IItPOPTANCE? Examoles that Would Anolv to Column 2 __ Project occurino wholly or nartlally within or contiguous to any facility or site listed on the Rational Renister of historic olaces. ~ Any imoact to an archeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Other tm~acts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATION WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT T~E OUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING NO OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU)IITIES?.. ..... Exampl'es that Would Apply to Column 2 Th~ permanent foreclosure of a future recreational oooortunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the cm~unity. Other tmoacts: IMPRCT ON TRANSPORTATION 13. ))ILL'THERE BE AN EFFECT TO EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS? ............................................... Examples that Would Anply to Column 2 Alteration of present natterns of movement of neoole and/or goods. Project will result in severe traffic mroblems. 14. !MPACT ON ENERGY WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO _YES ENERAY SUPPLY? Examples that Would Aiii}'}~'~ii~'} ............. ~0 Project causing qreater than 5% increase in any form of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than SO single or two family residences. 1' 2. Other impacts: IMPACT ON NOISE 15. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, NOISE, GLARE, VIBP~ATION NO t YES or ELECTRIr~AL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? .... Examples that 14auld Aooly to Column 2 __ Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. __ Odors will occur routinely {more than one hour per day). Project will produce operating noise exceedinp the -- local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. __ Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: ~MPACT ON HEALTH & HAZAR~ 16. !JILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC IIEALTN AND SAFETY? ............. ~ Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 __ Project will cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances {~.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will he a chronic low level discharge or emission. Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc., including wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases.) Storaae ~acilities for one million or more gallnns of liouified natural gas or other liouids. Other impacts: SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAi( IMPACT CE '~DERATE LA~GE REDUCED BY IMPACT I'iPACT PROJECT CHAN.S~ IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTE~ OF CO!~I!UNITY OR 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPACTE~ nF THE EXISTINR COHMUNITY? ................................................ ~C Example that Would Apoly to Column 2 The population of the City, Town or Village in which the project is located la likely to grow by more than 5% oF resident human population. ' -- The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera- ting services will increase by mere than 5% per year as a result of this project. " ~ Will involve any oermanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remeve nrime agricultural lands from cultivation. ~ The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. __ Development will induce an influx of a particular age g~up with special needs. __ ProJect will set an important precedent for future prolects. __ Project will relocate 15 or mere employees in one or mere businesses. Other imoacts: 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 Either government or citizens of adjacent co~nuntties ~'have expressed opposition or rejected the prolect or have not been contacted. __ Objections to the nroject from within the community. NO DETERMINATION Upon review of the info.etlon recorded on this EAr (Parts l, 2 and 3) and constderinq both the mapnttude md tmnortance of each i~act, it is reasonably determined that: A. The project will result in no major impacts a~d, therefore, is one which may not cause significant damape to the environment. B. Although the project could have e significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been included as part of the oroposed project. C. The project will result in one or more major adverse impacts that cannot be reduce~and mY cause significant damage to the envi ronms~, ~/~ ~/~j '//,. .tgnature of ~narer (if~d~~sible office) PA ) !!1PACT PROJECT CiL~GE IF ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS IOEHTIFIED AS A [ POTENTIAL LARGE IMPACT OR IF YOU CANNOT DETEt~MINE ) THE MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. I PORTIONS OF F~AF COMPLETED FOR TWIS PR(~ECT: PART I ~'PART Ii ,, 7PART 3 PREPARE A tIEnATIVE DECLAI~TION 0 PREPARE A NE('~ATIVE (~ECLARATION © PREPARE POSITIVE DECLARATION PROCEED WITU EIS © Signature of Responsible Official in Lead Agency ~ or ty~e na.e of .esponsiblJ official in Lead Agency TOWN OF $OUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 February 11, TEL. 765-1802 1981 Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Re: Kontokosta Associates Site Development Plan November 20, 1980 Proposed Shipyard Project Gentlemen: This proposed project is in the M-1 Zone District. Referring to Chapter 100-Zoning: Marina for Non Commercial boats is a permitted use by special exception subject to site plan approval, 100-50B. See Chapter 32,100-23F mentions work below datum of mean high water of tidal waters must comply and be approved by all govermental agencies having such jurisdiction. See Chapters 32 and 97. Article V~M-1 Zone 100-50B (3): Multiple Dwellings are permitted by Special Exception subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board - Art XIII,100-51 Bulk Area Parking Requirement and Schedule: The proposed comply except the administration office Coffee Shop building cannot be any closer than 50' to the rear property line. Off street parking '100-112A: The Planning Board shall determine the number of parking spaces to be required. The parking spaces shown scales the minimum size that is required (10' X 20'). 100-112 J (1) Parking spaces shall be marked. 100 112J (5): The parking area shall be screened and approved by the Planning Board. The proposed Admistration - Coffee Shop building can be permitted if the intended use is only for accessory use 100-50C. Also at the completion of the project a complete set of drawings should be required to be filed with the Planning Board and or in the Building Inspectors office. Page #2 Planning Board Re: Kontokosta Associates Site Development Plan I would like to suggest a clear level access be provided for emergency vehicle (ambulance - a fire truck) from a paved area to the southerly end of the marina on both sides. Such access be 12 to 15' wide 100-50C, accessory use permitted as in 100-30C (4): The storage of boats owned and used by the occupants etc. shall be stored only in the required rear yard etc. 100-40C (3) Signs: I do not see any signs provision on the site plan. Yours truly, George H. Fisher Sr. Building Inspector GHF:JKD XC Atty. Richard Lark RICHARD F. LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW MAIN ROAD -P. O. BOX 973 ~. George H. Fisher Senior Building Inspector Main Road Southold, New York 11971 .~l~e Plan Emanuel M. Kontokos%a :'~' Approval ' Shipyard Lane, Lash ~%arion, New Yor~ Dear Hr. Fisher: ' A~ the request of the 3oar~ of Appeals I am submitting in triplicate the proposed ~.m~nded Site Plan in the above- cartione~ m:?Lter. After you have reviewe<~ same, kindly forward it the Planning Board as the i~oard of A.~peal. s would their comments. I would also appreci~ate receiving copy of your written Very ~iy yours, RFL:kc Enclosure~ CC; Southold Town Planning Board ~.manuel M. Kontokosta APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHARLES GRIGONIS, .JR., CHAIRMAN SERGE DOYEN, JR. T~. 7, 7, '.' ROBERT J. DOUGLASS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER doseph H. Sa~ick~ Southold Town Board of Appeals HAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 119'7'1 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 TO: Southold Town Planning Board FROM: Southold Town Board of Appeals DATE: January 7, 1981 SUBJECT: Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta - Appeal No. 2772 Gentlemen: As you know, Mr. Kontokosta has made an application for a Special Exception dated December 23, 1980 to amend the previously granted Special Exception concerning property located at the west side of Shipyard Lane, East Marion. The Board of Appeals in its original grant of the Special Exception approved 28 multiple-dwelling units and 21 motel units on the site. The new application proposes to eliminate the motel units; add an additional 20 multiple-dwelling units; and add a 58-boat marina. As to the multiple-dwelling units, the Board of Appeals in passing upon the application must determine that each multiple dwelling unit has a minimum of 9,000 square feet of land area available. The Board cannot at this time make this determination without first knowing what land area the Planning Board will require for the marina use when passing upon the Amended Site Plan. Therefore, the Board of Appeals would suggest that the Planning Board consider the Amended Site Plan at this time with particular reference to the marina use, including all parking and other facilities related thereto, in order that we may give consideration to the multiple-dwelling use. Very truly yours, CHARLES GRIGONIS, R. CHAIRMAN CG:lk TOWN OF $OUTHOLD, NEW YORK ~PPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION NO. ~ 7Y~ DATE .~g~rab~i:..2.3, 1980 TO TI~E ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, SOUTHOLD, N. Y. Emanuel M. Kontokosta of 43 West 54th Street Name Street and Number New York New York 10019 .................... Municipality State hereby apply to THai ZONING BOARD O¥ APPEALS for a SPECIAL EXCEPTION in accordance with the ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE V SECTION 100-50 B 2 & 3 and C 2 Petitioner received a Special Exception from the Southold Town Board of Appeals under Appeal No. 2579 to erect a 28 unit apartment complex, 21 motel units and accessory coffee shop on January 17, 1980. (A copy of said approval is attached hereto as Exhibit A). Subsequent to that approval, Petitioner received Site Plan Approval from the Southold Town Planning Board on June 30, 1980. (A copy of that approval is attached hereto as Exhibit B). On October 20, 1980, the Southold Town Building Department issued building permits #10924 and #10925 to construct two multiple dwelling buildings each containing 14 living units. (Copies of these permits are attached hereto as Exhibits C & D respectively). The amended Site Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit E, provides for: The addition of a 58 boat marina, approximately 420 feet long, 120 feet wide, and 9 feet deep, with a 50 foot wide access into the bay; the deletion of all the 21 motel units and provide in lieu of 20 residential units for a total of 48 units; the addition of a swimming pool; new locations for the westerly residential units and the accessory building to be located at the head of the marina so it can be effectively utilized as a coffee shop, maintenance shop and offices for the complex. The new plan provides adequate off-street parking, ample screening and landscaping. All the residential units will be in condominium form of ownership requiring approval by the Attorney General's Office. Simultaneously with this application approvals and permits are being sought from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and Suffolk County Department of Health. As seen from the Zoning Analysis on the Site Plan all the buildings will be located 100 feet from the ordinary high water mark of Gardiners Bay and will meet all the bulk and parking requirements for a "M-1 General Multiple Residence District." The proposal for the additional residential units rather than motel units will not change the character of the surrounding neighborhood which is basically residential as seen from a portion of the Building Zone Map attached as Exhibit F, except for the Long Island Oyster Farms oyster processing plant zoned C-1 General Industrial Distr~ct located on the easterly side of Shipyard Lane. EMANUEL M~KO~OKOSTA, PETIT~E~ STATE OF NEW YORK ) ' / /' ' ) ~s ~....j...: ........................................... COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) Richard F. LarkSignatuPe/ as Attorney Sworn to this .....2.~.~;.~1 .............. day of .D.~.~9.I1~.~.12. ......... , 19...~.Q ........ Notary Public ~&BETT2 CORNINE NOTAEY PIJ,~[IC, Stc?e of New York Suffc!k Count'/ No. 52-5792800 Commission Expires A~=rch 30, FORM ZB2 MATCH CD P D. 65 RICHARD F. LARK June 16, 1980 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road - Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Muriel Tolman, Secretary RE: Emanual Kontokosta - Site Plan Shipyard Lane, East Marion, New York Dear Ms. Tolman: Pursuant to the inspection report of John W. Davis dated May 28, 1980, the applicant, Emanuel Kontokosta made some minor revisions to his site plan dated February 7, 1979. I am enclosing an original and two copies of this map which do not constitute a new sub- mission, but merely conform with Mr. Davis' suggestions. Kindly advise me of the status of this matter. RFL:bc Enclosures Very ~u~y yours,. hard F. ~k cc: Emanue 1 Kontokosta INSPECTION REPORT TO: Raymond C. Dean, Superintenden~ Town Highway Department Southold, New York 11971 FROM: John W. Davis NO. DATE: May 28, 1980 SHIPYARD LANE at EAST MARION RE: (Grading and Water RetenTion) COMMENTS: Review of above plans, dated received 2/8/80, as follows: Grading: ' 1. A survey of the existing ground elevations was made by Van T~yl, fc~ the owners. Copy of this survey (50 ft. grid) attached. All contours shown based on this information. Existing contours and existing contours to remain are reasonably close to the Van T~yl work. 2. Access roads and parking areas are shown with minus grades to Shipyard Lane. Profiles for the access roads should be submitted and to show that no drainage runoff will go into Shipyard Lane. 0 Plans show an elevation of 2;9 at intersection of Shipyard Lane and the dual access roads. Van Tayl has a road elevation of 5.5 only 50 ft. south. Road elevations on Shipyard Lane should be submitted where new construction w~k is adjacent. The Van ~yl information starts at the R.O.W. line and with the exception of two roadway loca- tions, all elevations are off the road. Drainage: 1. Do not .agree with designer's 50% absorption for one inch of rain runoff at L.P.'s. The L.P.'s are limited to one ring-due-~d the water table at Klev. 0.O0 and infiltration will not be very effective. The adjacent access roads and parking areas are crowned to the center. The 2 northerly L.P.'s in the larger area are at the low ooint, Elev. 5:33. If these L.P.'s were pipe connected and with a discharge line into the westerly open area, drainage relief could be provided during heavy storms. 2. The smaller access road and parking area appears to have the same drainage relief. problem. The northerly L.P. here is also the low point at Elev. 5.33. A discharge pipe from this L.P. to the swale area along Shipyard Lane could provide some drainage relief. 3. Grading between the two road and parking areas shows contours that slope to Shipyard Lane. Drainage runoff would go to the same swale area. Use of the swale for drainage~ purposes should be further investigated by the owners. C.C. Southold Town Planning Board C.C. Highway Committee C.C. L.M. lhthill~ P.E. $OUTHOLD TOWN HWY. INSPECTION REPORT TO: FROM: .~aymond C. Dean, Superintendent Town Highway Department Southold, New York 11971 John W. Davis NO. 13h DATE: May 28, 1980 SHIPYARD LANEat EAST MARION RE: (Grading and Water Retention) COMMENTS: Review of above plans, dated received 2/8/80, as follows: Grading: ' 1. A survey of the existing ground elevations was made by Van T~yl, fc~ the owners. e Copy of this survey (50 ft. grid) attached. All contours shown based on this informatioN. Existing contours and existing contours to remain are reasonably close to the Van Tayl work. Access roads and parking areas are shown with minus grades to Shipyard Lane. Profiles for the access roads should be submitted and to show that no drainage runoff will go into Shipyard Lane. Plans show an elevation of .2~9 at intersection of Shipyard Lane and the dual access roads. Van Tayl has a road elevation of 5.5 only50 ft. south. Road elevations on Shipyard Lane should be submitted where new construction w~k is adjacent, qbe Van Tayl information starts at the R.O.W. line and with the exception of two roadway loca- tions, all elevations are off the road. Drainage: 1. Do not ~gree with designer's 50% absorption for one inch of rain runoff at L.P.'s. ~he L.P.'s are limited to one ring due -~6 the water table at Elev. 0.00 and infiltration will not be very effective, qbe adjacent access roads and parking areas are crowned to the center, qbe 2 northerly L.P.'s in the larger area are at the low point, Elev. 5~33. If these L.P.'s were pipe connected and with a discharge line into the westerly open area, drainage relief could be provided during heavy storms. 2. qbe smaller access road and parking area appears to have the sa~e drainage relier problem. The northerly L.P. here is also the low point at Elev. 5.33. A discharge pipe from this L.P. to the swale area along Shipyard Lane could provide some drainage relief. ~ 3. Grading between the two road and parking areas shows contours that slope to Shipyard Lane. Drainage runoff would go to the same swale area. Use of the swale for drainage~ purposes should be further investigated by the o%~ers. C.C. Southold Town Planning Board C.C. Highway Committee C.C. L.M. Tuthill~ P.E. SOUTHOLD TOWN HWY. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDKNG RqSPECTOR TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 March &, 1980 TEL. 765-~1802 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Site Development Plan Proposed Shipyard Lane Project Kontokosta Associates Date 2/7/79 Rev. 11/28/79 Gentlemen: The rear and side yards have been marked on the site plan (in red) according to the definition in Zoning, 100-13. Off-street parking 100-112: The Planning Board shall determine the number of parking spaces required for the twenty-eight (28) apart- ment units. The site plan says one (1) car parking per apartment. Shouldn't allowance be made for guests or two (2) car occupants of the apartment. The coffee shop is an accessory for occupants and no extra parking is shown or is required. According to my scaling of the parking area this plan does not meet the Section 100-112 Code. A minimum of 10' width for each parking stall is required. Referring to Section 100-112 J (1), parking spaces shall be individ- ually identified by means of pavement markings. Al~so,.100-112 J (5) screening of the parking approved by the Planning ~oarm. Yours truly, GEORGE H. FISHER Sr. Building Inspector xc: Richard F. Lark COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING LEE E. KOPP£LMAN January 15, 1980 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Map of Minor Subdivision - E. M. Kontokosta W/s Shipyard Lane 2,459'! s/of Main Road, East Marion, N.Y. Dear Mr. Raynor: It has been the policy of the Suffolk County Planning Commission to require as a condition of approval of a subdivision the establishment of a conservation buffer or easement along the subdivision's shoreline frontage. This condition is usually stated as follows: A conservation buffer or easement having a minimum width of at least 50 feet shall be established along the shoreline. The Comm4ssion has left the details of the establishment and regulation of the conservation area up to the discretion of the planning board. The objective of the Commission in mandating this requirement is to protect all tidal waters from situations caused by construction and regrading; from the influence of induced nutrients from fertilizers; and from any other materials that could cause degradation of the waters and harm to the animal and plant species therein. It is felt that by establishing a buffer or easement area that will be left essentially in a natural state or developed with sufficient ground cover to prevent the lateral movement of silts and fertilizers this objective can be achieved. It should be noted that lawn grasses that require heavy fertilization and treatment with fungicides, pesticides and herbicides prevent this objective from being reached. Landscaped areas planted with native and salt-tolerant species would be most desir- able. Fifty feet is considered to be the minimemwidth needed provided that the ground is level. Where the property slopes down to the water it is necessary to require a wider conservation area. Surface water will move over an area having moderate to steep slopes more rapidly than it will over level areas. Rapid movement of surface water will prevent much of the sediment from dropping out of the water Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman 2 January 15, 1980 ...................... m ....................................................... within the conservation area and will decrease the ability of the plants to ab- sorb the chemicals in solution. The nature of the soils will also play a role in the establishment of the width of the area. Therefore, there are many factors, many of a local nature, that must be considered in establishing the conservation area. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning · Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section File: S-SD-79-16 CGL:jk OP.Y e.m. kontokosia pe. gary rogers ~a. January 7, 1980 Mr. Charles Grigonis,Jr., Chairman Soutl~old Town Board of Appeals Nain Road, State Road 25 So~lthold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Shipyard Lane Project East Marion Dear' Mr. Grigonis: We are in receipt of a copy of your letter dated 12/30/80 to our attorney, Mr. Richard Lark, concerning the Shipyard Lane project. We are in the process of preparing for submission to the Appeals Board the information requested therein. However, since time is of the essence in that we plan to complete this project in 1981, we would like to meet with both you and the chairman of the planning board, Mr. Henry Raynor, for an informal ~neetin9 to discuss your thoughts on the project and how we can possibly expedite its approval in order ~o meet our construction schedule. Would you be so kind as to arrange such a meeting with Mr. Raynor at a mutually convenient time, and let me know so that I may attend. Your cooperation in this matter would / · be greatly appreciated. EMK/ck c.c: Mr. Henry Raynor, Chairman Planning Board HENRY E RAYNOR, Jr.. Chairman FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI. Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 January 10, 1980 TELEPHONE 765- 1938 Mr. Charles O. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section Suffolk County Dept. of Planning Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11787 Re: Map of Minor Subdivision of E. M. Kontokosta on west side of Shipyard Lane in East Marion Dear Mr. Lind: We are confused as to the exact meaning of the Commission's third, condition in regard to the above-captioned matter. It reads as follows - "A conservation buffer or easement having a minimum width of at least 50 feet shall be established along the shoreline." ¥~at would or would not be permitted within this area. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Muriel Tolman, Secretary Re: Kontokosta 1117/~O ~:proved, subject to the foL-Jwing conditions: 1. Approval from the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services. 2. Approval from the New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation. 3. Approval from the Southold Town Planning Board for Site Plan. Approval from the Suffolk County Planning Commission pursuant to Section 1331. Approval of the sewage disposal systems from the Suffolk County Dept of Health. No further subdivision except by application and approval from the Southold Town Planning Board and Board of Appeals and appropriate other agencies where required. No residential structure shall be located within 100 feet of mean hi( line. No sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or installed within 100 feet of mean highwater line. 9. A conservation buffer or easement having a minimum width of 50 feet shall be es- tablished along the shoreline. 10. No storm-water runoff resulting from the ~T~velopment and improvement of the pending subdivision and any of the lots shall be discharged directly into Gard- iner's Bay. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING December 6, 1979 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Map of Minor Subdivision - E. M. Kontokosta West side of Shipyard Lane 2,458.97 feet south of Main Road, East Marion, New York. Dear Mr. Raynor: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on December 5, 1979, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat entitled, "Minor Subdivision - E. M. Kontokosta", referred to it pursuant to Section 1333 of the Suffolk County Charter. After due study and deliberation it resolved to approve said map subject,' to the following 5 conditions deemed necessary to help preserve the natural and / aesthetic attributes of Gardiner's Bay: ~ 1. No residential structure shall be located within 100 feet of the mean high water line. 2. No sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or installed within 100 feet of the mean high water line. 3. A conservation buffer or easement having a minimum width of at least 50 feet shall be established along the shoreline. No stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of the subdivision and any of the lots shall be discharged directly into Gardiner's Bay. 5. No lot shall be subdivided in the future without the approval of the Planning Board. The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use and consideration: Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman 2 December 6, 1979 ............................................................................ The conditional approval granted to this subdivision applies only to the creation of the subdivision and should not be construed as an endorsement of any proposed multiple use requiring the approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any application made to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a special exception or vari- ance to permit the proposed multiple use will be subject ~o separate review and consideration bythe Commission. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section File: S-SD-79-16 CGL:Jk Encl.: Map New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Regulatory Affairs Unit Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 516-751-7900 Commissioner December 4, 1979 $outhold Town Board of Appeals Main Street Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Linda Kowalski, Secretary Re: Application by Emanuel Kontokosta, 28 unit apartment complex and 21 unit motel development at Shipyard Lane, Southold, New York TW 15278-0143, SPDES NY 0177059 Dear ~. Kowalskt: Recently I advised you of this Department's position and involvement per- taining to the above project. As indicated in my 11/19 letter we were anticipating the receipt of re- vised plans which were to mitigate the concerns we had for the project. For this reason I requested that the Board defer their formal decision with regard to the significance of the action. The applicant has submitted revised plans relocating the cesspools and providing for handling surface drainage and regrading to minimize runoff enter- ing adjacent waters. The application for the State Tidal Wetlands permit now appears to be approvable as revised, providing, however, that the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has no objections to the revised location and design of the dis- posal systems. We have reviewed your Positive Declaration dated 11/29/79 and note that the reasons given for significance were the same parameters we had concern for prior to seeking the revised plan. We have therefore advised the applicant to inform you of the modifications. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services is also being notified by copy of this letter (w/copy rev. plan). i  Attn: Linda Kowalski December 4, 1979 Please advise this Department if your determination of significance is changed by this latest submittal. We will consider the Tidal Wetlands and State Pollutant Discharge Elimima- tion System (SPDES) permits incomplete until a Draft Environmental Impact State- ment or a Negative Declaration is received from your agency. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Sincerely, David De Ridder Associate Env. Analyst DDR:ll cc: D. Middleton R. Jewell, SCDHS E. Kontokosta t~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK~ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS, M.D., M.P.H. December 3, 1979 Mr. Robert J. Douglass, Acting Chairman Town of Southold Board of Appeals Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Appeal No. 2579 Emanuel M. Kontokosta Dear Mr. Douglass: In regards to the pending application, we have met with Mr. Kontokosta and reviewed the preliminary layout of his proposed complex. Water supply for the complex will be from the Village of Greenport water system so that an on-site water supply will not be necessary. The proposed sewage disposal system or systems will be septic tank-leaching pool systems and as such may require the placement of fill to raise the grade in the areas of the sewage disposal facilities. Mr. Kontokosta is aware that site grading plans will be required by this office as part of his submission to the Health Depart- ment for approval. We will also require either a copy of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation wetlands permit if necessary, or if not required, their comments as they pertain to this site. Please keep us informed of arty action or decision on your part for our records. Very truly yours, Robert A. Villa, P.E. Chief General Engineering Services RAV:cah So H old Town of Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. I., N.Y. 11971 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS CHAR LES GR IGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. TERRY TUTHILL ROBERTJ. DOUGLASs ~, Acting Chairman TELEPHONE {516) 765-'1809 November 29, 1979 To: Southold Town Planning Board Re: Appeal No. 2579 - Emanuel M. Kontokosta Dear Sirs: This Department has received the subject application for permission to construct a 28-unit apartment Complex With 21 motel units With a coffee shop as an accessory use at Shipyard Lane, East Marion, Town of Southold, New York, part of County Tax Map Item #1000-38-007-04. Pursuant to Section 617.10 of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Act, notice is hereby given that the proposed action may have a Signi- ficant effect on the environment, -and that the applicant mqst prepare.a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Please let us know your comments and recommendations on this action if you have not already done so to be received by this Department not later We shall interpret a lack of response to mean no objection by your agency, than December 20,.1979. Enclosures Sincerely yours, ROBERT j. DOUGLASS, rman By~ Li~. Kowalskl. Secretary HENRY E. RAYNOR. Sr.. Chairman FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL BENNETT OItLOWSKI, GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. Southold, N.Y. 11971 November 20, 1979 'fELEPHONE ?65- 1938 Mr. Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Suffolk County Dept. of Pls~uing Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11787 Re: Minor Subdivision - E. M. Kontokosta - W/s Shipyard Lane East Marion Dear Mr. Lind: Our Town Attorney has advised us that at this time the above-captioned matter is to be viewed strictly as a subdivision in spite of the fact that there is a multiple use contemplated. At the time the plans are submitted to the Southold Town Board of Appeals, all necessary permits will be channeled through that Board for special exception under our zoning ordinance. As to the future development within the lot lines indicated on the subdivision, if we can at that point provide you with any further assistance, please feel free to call on us. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD HER/mt Copy to Richard Lark, Esq. Regulatory Affairs Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 516-751-7900 Commissioner November 19, 1979 Southold Tow~ Board of Appeals Main Street Southold, New York 11971 Attn: Linda Kowalski, Secretary Dear Ma. Kowalski: Application by Emanuel Kontokosta, 28 unit apartment complex and 21 unit motel development at Shipyard Lane, Southold, NY TW 15278-0143, SPDES NY 0177059 The purpose of this letter is to clarify this Department's position with regard to State Tidal Wetlands and State Environmental Quality Review (SEQRA) Act for the above project. This office has recently received updated plans from the applicant which has raised some concern about the project's possible effects on the adjacent littoral zone. The density of units proposed and the location of sanitary sewage systems create a potential for adverse impacts to Gardiners Bay. To mitigate or eliminate those impacts the applicant has been requested to resubmit plans relocating the sanitary systems further landward on the site and also prepare drainage plans to minimize the amount of runoff entering the waters of Gardiners Bay. We therefore request that you delay your formal decision with regard to the significance of the project until we have completed our review of the revised plans. Southold Town Board of Appeals Attn: Linda Kowalski, Secretary -2- November 19, 1979 Thank you for your cooperation. LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Hearings NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law, Public Hearings will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, in said town on the 14th day of November, 1979 on the questionof the following: 7:30 p.m. Approval of the minor subdivision of property of Zena and Rhoda Kaplan situate, lying and being at East Marion in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the southerly line of Main Road with the westerly line of Shipyard Lane and running along said westerly line of Shipyard Lane three courses: (1) S. 36° 36' 10" E. 833.33 feet; thence (2) S. 35° 56' 30" E. 832.52 feet; thence (3) S. 35° 41' 30" E. 643.12 feet to land of Parkside Heights Company; thence along said land two courses: (1) S. 55° 16' 00" W. 500.13 feet; thence (2) S. ll° 49' 30" W. 529 feet, more or less, to ordinary high water mark of Gardiners Bay; thence westerly along said high water mark 100 feet, more or less, to land of Kavanaugh; thence along said land of Kavanaugh four courses: (1) N. ll~ 49' 30" E. 467 feet, more or less; thence (2) S. 85~ 45' 20" W. 250 feet; thence (3) N. 33~ 30' 50" W. 427.54 feet; thence (4) S. 58° 49' 10" W. 87.89 feet to land of Dawn Estates Shopping Center; thence along said land of Dawn Estates Shopping Center, other land of Kavanaugh, and land of North Fork Equities, Inc. N. 33~ 22' 50" W. 812.15 feet; thence continuing along said land of North Fork Equities, Inc., N. 34° 34' 40" W. 1067.74 feet to the southerly line of Main Road; thence along said southerly line of Main Road four courses: (1) N. 71~ 44' 30" E. 93.75 feet; thence (2) N. 77* 42' 30" E. 221.37 feet; thence (3) N. 64* 53' 30" E. 115.23 feet; thence (4) N. 57~ 40' 40" E. 430.21 feet to the 'point of beginning. Excepting therefrom a parcel of land conveyed to the State of New York for drainage purposes. Containing 44.895 acres. 8:00 p.m. Approval of the minor subdivision of property of E. M. Kontokosta situate, lying and being at East Marion in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being more Legal Notice SPage Two particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane distant' 2458.97 feet southerly from the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) with the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane; thence S. 35° 41' 30" E. along the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane 755 feet to the ordinary high water line of Gardiners Bay; thence along the ordinary high water line of Gardiners Bay the following four tie line courses and distances: (1) S. 37° 28' 00" W. 346.66 feet; (2) N. 88° 33' 40" W. 201.57 feet; (3) N. 69° 06' 30" W. 367.59 feet; (4) N. 76° ll' 20" W. 300.18 feet to land now or formerly of Dawn Estates Shopping Center; thence N. ll° 49' 30" E. along the last mentioned land ~80 feet to land of Parkside Heights Co.; thence along saidland of Parkside Heights Co. the following two courses and distances: (1) N. 85° 45' 20" E. 229.70 feet; and (2) N. 55° 16' 00" E. 340 feet to the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane at the point or place of beginning. Containg 13.182 acres. 8:30 p.m. Approval of the minor subdivision of property of John C. and Frank J. Diller situate, lying and being at Peconic in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northerly line of Middle Road at the southwesterly corner of the premises herein described and being the southeasterly corner of land of Simon Estate; running thence along said land of Simon Estate three courses: (1) N. 34° 22' 30" W. 307.66 feet; thence (2) N. 45° 45' 30" W. 2827.53 feet; thence (3) N. 45° 52' 50" W. 1985 feet to ordinary high water mark of Long Island Sound; thence easterly along said high water mark 475 feet, more or less, to a point on the westerly line of land of Ross, said point being N. 67° 17' 40" E. 476.05 feet from the last described point; thence along said land of Ross S. 46° 25' 50" E. 666.77 feet to land of Morgan; thence along said land of Morgan So 46° 55' 20" E. 521.68 feet; thence continuing along said land of Morgan and along land of Minakyan S. 46° 35' 30" E. 1794.90 feet; thence continuing along said land of Minakyan three courses: (1) S. 46° 21' 10" E. 704.20 feet; thence (2) S. 46~ 17' 20" E. 364.33 feet; thence (3) S. 46° 52' E. 1171.20 feet to said northerly line of Middle Road; thence along said northerly line of Middle Road three Legal Notice Page Three courses: (1) S. 70° 45' W. 4.0 feet; thence (2) S. 71° 30' W. 639.0 feet; thence (3) S. 68° ll' W..80 feet to the point of be- ginning. Containing 53.649 acres. Excepting therefrom 2.589 acres conveyed to the County of Suffolk. 9:00 p.m. Approval of the minor subdivision of property of William L. and Muriel A. Murray situate, lying and being at Cutchogue in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument set on the northerly line of Main Road 572.7 feet easterly along said line from the easterly line of Cox's Lane, said monument being the southwesterly corner of the premises herein described and the southeasterly corner of land of Halikias; running thence along said land of Halikias and along land of Cox Lane Associates N. 43° 05' 20" W. 756.06 feet to a monument; thence continuing along said land of Cox Lane Associates three courses: (1) N. 43* 44' 40" E. 5.65 feet; thence (2) N. 23~ 44' E. 166.46 feet; thence (3) N. 31~ 04' E. 103.51 feet to a monument and land of Robinson; thence along said land of Robinson S. 43° 33' E. 650.75 feet to a monument and land of Brynda; thence along said land of Brynda two courses: (1) S. 38° 25' W. 150.13 feet to a monument; thence (2) S. 43° 53' E. 158.71 feet to said northerly line of Main Road; thence along said northerly line two courses: (1) S. 37~ 37' W. ll3.0 feet; thence (2) S. 43° 44' 40" W. 5~65 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 4.182 acres. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matters should appear at the time and place above specified. Dated: November 2, 1979 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN Copies to: PLANNING BOARD HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN The Suffolk Times The L. I. Traveler-Watchman Mr. Bernard Kaplan Richard Lark, Esq. John C. Diller Mr. and Mrs. William L. Murray Supervisor James F. Homan COMMISSION Seth A. Hubbard Chairman Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning Suffolk County Department of Planning JOHN V.N. KLEIN, County Executive Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, L. L, N. Y. · 2~:-~i~: 979-2918 November 8, 1979 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - E. M. Kontokosta W/s Shipyard Lane 2,453±' s/of Main Road, East Marion, N.Y. Dear Mr. Raynor: It was the consensus of the members of the Connnission that the referral of the proposed subdivision is premature and incomplete. The Connnission feels that it will be difficult to evaluate the impact of this proposal on the adjacent body of water, Gardiner's Bay, on the basis of the informa- tion provided. Of particular concern is the general, low lying nature of the tract, the proposed plans to develop Lots 1 and 2, and whether the development will be a condominium. It is suggested that information be provided on these aspects of the subdivision. In addition, information should be provided on the zoning aspects of this proposal; that is, does the zoning ordinance allow the type of development proposed. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Section File: S-SD-79-16 CGL:er HENRY E. RAYNOR. Jr., Cha~rma~ FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKL Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 October 25, 1979 TELEPHONE 765-19~ Suffolk County Planning Commission Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11787 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section 1333, Article XIII of the Suffolk County Charter, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed final plat to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Name of Plat - Minor Subdivision of E. M. Kontokosta Hamlet - East Marion in The Town of Southold Material submitted: Proposed plat - 3 copies Comments - This property is zoned M-1 General Multiple-Residence District. Mr. Kontokosta is seeking a subdivision into three lots. Upon approval of same, he will present an application to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold in regard to Lots I and 2. He is seeking a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 100-50 B(3) (4) and C(2) for permission to erect a 28 unit apartment complex with 21 motel units and a coffee shop. If he is successful with obtaining the special exception, he will be back to the Planning Board for site plan approval. At that time, the roads and drainage and grading will be defined and the maps will again be presented to your agency for comment. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Muriel Tolman, Secretary HENRY E. RAYNOR, .~r.. Ci~airma~ FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL BENNETT ORLOWSKI, Jr. GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM. Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 October 23, 1979 TELEPHONE 785- 1938 Richard Lark, Esq. Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Lark: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board at a regular meeting held October 18, 1979. RESOLVED to approve the sketch map of the minor subdivision of E. M. Kontokosta located at East Marion. RESOLVED to set 8:00 p.m., Wednesday, November 14, 1979, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and~place for a public hearing on the question of the approval of the minor subdivision of E. M. Kontokosta located at East Marion. Yours truly, Muriel Tolman, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board RICHARD F, LARK ATTORNEY AT LAW October 11, 1979 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall - Main Road Southold, New York 11971 ATT: Muriel Tolman, Secretary RE: Minor Subdivision for E, M. Kontokosta Dear Ms. Tolman: In connection with the above-captioned minor subdivision, I am enclosing the following: 1. Application of Emanuel M. Kontokosta and Parkside Heights Co, in duplicate, 2. Short Environmental Assessment Form. e Six prints of map of proposed subdivision prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl, P,C., dated September 25, 1979. 4. Affidavit of Alice Kontokosta and Cally Kontokosta, co-partners of Parkside Heights Co. 5. My check payable to the Town of Southold in the amount of $30.00. If all is in order, kindly place this matter on the agenda for the next meeting of the Planning Board and advise me of the date and time. Very J~r~uly yours RFL/mld Enclosures STATE OF NEW YORK: : ss.: COUNTY OF N~W YOR~ ALICE KONTOKOSTA and CALLY KONTOKOSTA~ being duly sworn, depose and say: That they are co-partners of Parkside He~§ht$co., a co- partnership with office at 8020 Colonial Road, Brooklyn, New York. That Parkside He~gh~$Co. holds title to Lot 3 on a map entitled "Minor Subdivision for E. M. Kontokosta" by deed dated December 6, 1978 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on December 20, 1978 in Liber 8553, page 89. That the co-partners and their addresses are as follows: ALICE KONTOKOSTA CALLY KONTOKOSTA 8020 Colonial Road 8020 Colonial Road Brooklyn, New York Brooklyn, New York Cally Kontokosta Sworn to before me this ~ day of ~- 1979 ~ Public, ~tate ~ HoW{,Y~ No. 24-4~02300 comOu~llfled ir~ Kings Coun~ mission Expires March 30, t~ APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subd/vision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) The name of the subd/vision is to be Minor Subdivision for E. M. Kontokosta The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's off/ce as follows: Liber .... .8.~i,5.~ .............. Page .8.~. .... On D~c. embar 20t 1978.(Lot 1) Liber ..... 1~I~,5..~ .............. Page .8.1~. On .De..e.e..nP~...r 20, 1978 (Lot 2) Liber ..... 85.53 .............. Page ..... 119 .............. On De.¢e.q~bar..20.,.19.7.8;(Lot 3) LT. .......................... Pa. ....................... Liber .................... ~ ............... ; as devised under the Las ' estament of ........................................ $. The area of the land is . ..~.~.~.2 ...... acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid ~ .......... 7. The land is encumbered by ...t~..~?..~., ..................................................... mortgage (s) as follows: Lot 1 (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .8..3.4.6. ..... Page .... 2.7.1. ............ in original amount of $..5.1., .8..3.0.: .0.0... unpaid amount ~. .1. ,. .8 . 3. .0 . . . 0. .0.... held byBa~lar, c]./i~p, li~rl. A i ~heodore .~..ap..~.a..n ................. address .!.4.. p..a.w.n...p.r~ .v.e. ,..C..e.n. ke..r?..a??.,' . .~.e.¥..Y..o.r..~... Lot 2 (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .8..3.4.6. ..... Page .. ~.~0 .............. in original amount of *..8.2., .3.6. .0.; p.O.., unpaid amount $..8.2. !.3..6.0....0.0... held by Ba~n.ard. Katalan. anti. t 3 (c)L~ortgage recorded in Liber 8.34fi ...... Page .25-7 ............... in original amoum of $.56,1190..0~1.. unpaid amgunt $.5. .6.~ o..9.9...99.., held by Bernar~l. Kaplan. and. Th.e~o~or..o. ~aplax~ ..... address . 1.4. Dawn. Drive ,..Centereaoh,..New..York... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land ~1118 ........................ 9. The land lies in the following zoni~ng use districts ·-M,-1. GerleraJ, .Mllltipl~ ....... ...l~tsiclone~. DJ.s.~ri~:. ............................................................ 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, l~- 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The landi (does) ~jl~li,e in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is Incorporated Village of Gree.n_Dort 13. Water mains X0gl~:lr~ll~y have. been..laid..ill. Shipyar~l .Lane ................. and:zfjg) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by .LXL~.0 ................................. .................................... anti (a) 0~11) charge will be made for installing said lines. Applicant or owner of land will pay all charges. 15 as mains wilt he installed by ............................................................ 16. If streets sho~vn on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. -qhipyal:'d l.alle ~s a 8outhold Town Hi~llwav 17. xx streets shoxvn on the plat are cta~me~t by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Sched.ule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. 20. 21. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". ~one 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of gradiug and required public improvements will he $ .... .-.0..-.. as itemized in Schedule 'E" hereto aunexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at .... .-.0..- ....years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed/ surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE .......... .~..eRt..e?.~..e..r...2.4,,' 19..72. Emanuel Pl. Ko. ntoko.a, ta ..z. / Parkaide H,i§htsCo.(applicant) 9 East 78th Street/ New York, New York CallY Ko~tokosta (Address) ' ' 8020 Colonial Road Brooklyn, New York STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF .... S..U.P..F.O..L~.. ..................... ss: On the ..... ~.4J~I ....... day of .... ~.~P.~.eI~b..~r ......... 19..79.., before me personally came Emanuel M. Kontokosta ............................................ to me known to he the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that .... h..e. ....... executed the same. Notary Public MA,RY LOU OOROSK.~ NOTs~RY pUBLIC, State ef New york NO. 52-1000858 Suffolk County O~mmlssl~ Expires Mm'ch $0, 19' 0~ / STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF .... .H~....X.O...R~. ................... ss: On the .................. day .. .' ..... ~ ........... 19.7.9... before me personally came Alice gontokosta & Cally Kontokosta ................................................ ~o me known, who bein§ by me duly sworn did ~o, se,a~nd s_ay that ............ ~~ .t.h..e_v .a..r.e....t~..e..g.o. Tp..a.r.t..n.e..r.s...o.f Parkside ~O~r~Cs' co., a co-pa.rtnership, and that they executed the %.n.~..t.r..ua!..e..nt..i..n t..h.e, fl..z!n..name of .x~t%x Parkside Heights x~Wp~x Co. and that th~' 'had' 'a~/~'6~Yt~' '~'6' '~fi' '~l~e s~';' ~'~'~hey a~k'~owled~' '~' 'me that they x~ ..e~.ecuted the same as the agt and deed of said firm for tlh~' %/~'~i 'li/xkl p~rp6'~' ~:'li~'~'fh' .'fi~'fii:'i6'fi~: ..................................... ............ ............ · Notary Public ~llc, State I~ ~ ~.._, biO. 24'4~02300 ~,~mlfled In K riga Con~ty Schedule A ALL that certain ploti piece or parcel of landr situate, lying and being at East Marion in the Town of Southold, County Suffolk and State of New York, being more particularly bounded an~ described as follows: · BEGINNING at a point on the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane distant 2458.97 feet southerly from the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) with the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane; THENCE South 35° 41' 30'~ East along the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane 755 feet to the ordinary high water line of Gardiners Bay; thence along the ordinary high water line of Gardiners Bay the following four tie line courses and distances: (1) South 37° 28' 00" West, 346.66 feet; (2) North 88° 33' 40" West, 201.57 feet; (3) North 69° 06' 30" West 367.59 feet; (4) North 76° 11' 20" West, 300.18 feet to land now or formerly of Dawn Estates Shopping Center; thence North 11° 49' 30" East along the last mentioned land 480 feet to land of Parkside Heights Co.; thence along said land of Parkside Heights Co. the following two courses and distances: (1) North 85° 45' 20" East, 229.70 feet; and (2) North 55~ 16' 00" East, 340.D feet to the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane at the point or place of BEGINNING. OF SOUTHOLD SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FO~ ~o che ~roJec~ sics ar ~h~ai~y ~i~ar than 10 ac~s of 1~? i · . , ......... %es.X . No an e~=4~ ~cdI cz wa~er? ~ ............ Tee X ~-~%er qu~i~? ............ Zes X ~. '~ projec= si~ican~7 effec: ~a~ Tes X No " en~r~en=~ ~ea ~ a Zoc~ ~ency? . . . Tes X No Ante ~ a res~ of ~k~ p~jec:'s ~per~cion'? · . !3. Wi1'. pr=Jecu ~ve ~-7 ~ac: ~u pubLL: k~ai~k 07 :~=?---,v~.-. OATE:' Sept. 24~ 1979 ;/l/T3 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board-of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 15 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application· (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . .M.i..n.o..r...S.u..b.d..i.v.i..s.i..o.n...f.9.r...E.... M:..K.g.n..t.°..k.°.sta 3.The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber ..... 8..5.5.3 .............. Page ...... 8..1 .............. On P.e..c.e..nkb..e..r..2..0.~..1..9.7..8;(L°t 1) Liber ..... 8..5.5.3 .............. Page ...... 8..5 .............. On .D.e..c.e..n~b..e..r..2..0.~..1..9.7..8;(Lot 2) Liber ..... 85-53 .............. Page ..... B9 .............. On Deceatlxer..2fl,..19.'/8;(Lot 3) Ltb=r ........................ Page ............... ~~ ;' Liber ................. ~ ................ ; as devised under the L ' Testament of ........................................ 5. The area of the land is . .~3.,,.1~8.~ ...... acres. 6. All taxes xvhich are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid Ry~9l~x .......... 7. The land is encumbered by . .Lhr..~.~ ...................................................... mortgage (s) as follows: Lot 1 (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber 8346 Page 271 in original amount of $.~1.,.~1-3.0 ,.Q0... unpaid amount $~..1.~ .8.3.9....09... held by .B.e..r.n.a..r.d...K..ap.1..a.n...&...T. heodore · .K.~ ~ ................ address..1.4. I~ aw.n. Drive ,..Centareach,..blew..Yo. rk.. Lot 2 (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber ..8.3.4..6 ...... Page . .25.0. .............. in original amount of $.8..2,.$.6.Q ,.Q.0... unpaid amount $..8.2. ~..3..6.Q t.0.0.., held by .B..e.r..n.a.r~..K.~.p.~.n...~,n..d. Theodore Kaplan address 14 Dawn Drive, Centereach, New York Lot 3 (e) Mortgage reeorde~ in Liber R3.4.6 ...... Page .257 ............... in original amoum of $. 5.6 ,.0.90., 0.0.. unpaid amount $..5.6. t.0.~..fl., .O.0... held by t3.~.lf~r, ql. ~.~p.l.~r;t..~.n.d.. · .. ~3.~. O.~O~.~..K. 0.p. ].~n. .....address . ~.4..D. &W~..DKi .v.~ ,..C~.r~:.~ lt.q~.~h,..I~.qW..¥O.~'~... 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land ~¢~ ........................ 9. The land lies in the following zoni.ng use districts . .M.-.1..General .Mul:~iple ........ ...~e.~ i.cl~n ~.e...~.i..s.e.r..i.e..~. ............................................................ 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, l~¥ 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land, (does) (1{t~[%%X~9{~ lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is ...X.n.~. 9.r.P.Q .~.a..t.~..d..V..L.~.l.a.g.e...o.f...G..r.e..e.n.l~p.r..t ............. 13. Water mains ~{llcl~m~c ha.v.e, be~n., laid. in..qhipy.ard. LaD. e ................. and :{Ir.) (no) charge ~vill be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by .IL.~.GQ ................................. .................................... and (a) O~R) charge xvill be made for installing said lines. Applicant or owner of land will pay all charges. 15. as mains xvill be installed by ............................................................ 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. Shipy&rd T.oa-'xe is a Southold Town Hiqhwav 17. If streets shoxvn on the plat are ctalmec~ by tile applicant to be existing public streets in tile Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant xvill offer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". None 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $ .... 7.0.':.. as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at .... .".qT .... years. The Performance Bond will be written by a lieense<} surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F'. DATE .......... ~.~p.t;eltl]~.l;-...2.4. t ;, 19.7, .9. Parkside He1 ghtsCo, (Applicant~ Call~ Kontokosta 8020 Colonial Road Brooklyn, New York (_St~gnature and Title) - ~ ~ ff -- York (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF...~UE~QL~ ..................... ss: On the ..... 2tLth ........ day of .... ~ep. temb~r ......... 19..79.. before me personally came ....... E..m.a..n.u. 9.~' . .M.:..K. 9.n.~..o.k. 9.s..t.a' ....... to me known to be the individual described in and' wh,~ executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . ...h..e. ....... executed the same. Notary Pubr ubli~ MA,RY LOU DOtlOSK~ NOT&RY PUBLIC, Stats af New York NO. 52-1000~58 Suffolk C~nty O~mnllsslon Expires March 30, 19' ~/ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ....~.E~. XORK ................... ss: On the .................. day . .. ' .... ~f ........... 19..7.9..., before me personally came Al..i.e..e..K..o.n..t.o..k.o..s.~.a...~..C..a.i.l.y...Kp..n.~..o.k.o..~.~.~to me known, who being by ~ne duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ XM~N~I~6. tlle.~, ar~..the., cD.-ga~tr~ers. ~f. Heights- Co., a co-partnership, and that they executed the foregoing inst~umeat, in..the. ~izm. ~a~e..o~ .... ~_~x_. P.a~kai~e. 'H e i-9 h t s. ~l~x..Co.... that they had authority to sign the same, and they acknowledged to me that..they.., x~k. executed, the..sams, as..tha, act. andL .decal .off. said. ~ixm..for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. DELLA ROSARIO NMMrV Public. State of No. 24-,4~230~ Qualified in Kings Comrn .al®n ~xplres March Schedule A ALL that certain plot~ piece or parcel of land~ s£tuate~ lying and being at East Marion in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being more particularly bounded an( described as follows: ~ BEGINNING at a point on the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane distant 2458.97 feet southerly from the corner formed by the intersection of the southerly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) with the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane; THENCE South 35° 41' 30" East along the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane 755 feet to the ordinary high water line of Gardiners Bay; thence along the ordinary high water line of Gardiners Bay the following four tie line courses and distances: (1) South 37° 28' 00" West, 346.66 feet; (2) North 88° 33' 40" West, 201.57 feet;i.(~3) North 69° 06' 30" West 367.59 feet; (4) North 76° 11' 20" West, 300.18 feet to land now or formerly of Dawn Estates Shopping Center; thence North 11° 49' 30" East along the last mentioned land 480 feet to land of Parkside Heights Co.; thence along said land of Parkside Heights Co. the following two courses and distances: (1) North 85° 45' 20" East, 229.70 feet; and (2) North 55° 16' 00" East, 340.0 feet to the southwesterly side of Shipyard Lane at the point or place of BEGINNING. HENRY E. RAYNOR..Ir. , Chin. P~EDE~ICK l~,. GORDON JAMES WALL Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 SePtember 7, 1979 TELEPHONE 765- 1938 Richard Lark, Esq. Main Road Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Lark: The following decisions were made regarding the properties formerly owned by the Dawn Estates and the Kaplans. It will be Mr. Kontokosta's responsibility to make application for a minor subdivision of the three southerly lots in the Multiple-Zoned property now in the names of Parkside ~u~ Kon~o.~ ~. .... 5h~o Company~ ~ ~ It will be the responsibility of the Kaplans to make application for the subdivision in the residential area and make note that one of the lots has been transferred to Parkside Heights Company. They must also include the 100 foot strip in the Multiple zone. Yours truly, Copy to Emanuel Kontokosta HER/mt HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. July 25, 1979 Mr. Roy L. Ha~e Regulatory Affairs Building40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: TW15278-01~5 Emanual Kontokosta Dear Mr. Haje: The Town of Southold desires lead agency status in the above matter. There are several steps which the applicant must take to proceed with this project. 1. Apply for and receive approval of a subdivision of the property. 5 Apply for and receive approval from the Bo~ Appeals for the proposed apartment complex. Apply for and receive site plan approval from the SoUthOld Tomm Planning Board. This matter will not be acted upon until the above have been complied with. It would appear that the Board of Appeals would assume the lead agency status for the Town. Yours truly, HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Muriel Tolman, Secretary (Br~sh) New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Bldg. 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 (516) 751-7900 July 17, 1979 l~bert P. Flacke Commissioner Ms. Muriel Brush Town of Southold Planning Board Fmqn Street Southold, NY 11971 Re: TW 15278-0143 Emanual Kontokosta On June 12, 1979 we forwarded_ an in~liry letter regarding lead age~y status (copy enclosed). To date we have had no formal response although you indicated by telephone that th~ Town wanted lead agem~-y status. May we pl~.~e have oonfinration of this and an indication of how the Town intends to act Penuit Administrator Encl. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 July 2, 1979 TEL. 765-1802 Rhoda and Zena Kaplan c/o Dawn Estates 14 Dawn Drive Centereach, New York 11720 Re: County Tax Map No. 1000-35-08-005 Dear Sirs: Our tax maps and records show that you have divided your property on the west side of Shipyard Lane, East Marion. I have not found any approval by the Planning Board of a subdivision. A division of any parcel into two or more lots is a subdivision and the subdivider shall apply to the Planning Board for approval. I am bringing this to your attention so you may apply to the Planning Board. Very truly yours, GHF:bcc GEORGE H. FISHER Sr. Building Inspector cc: Planning Board TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 July 2, 1979 TEL. 765-1802 Dawn Estate Shopping Center Corp. 14 Dawn Drive Centereach, New York 11720 RE: County Tax Map No. 1000-38-7-4 Gentlemen: Our tax maps and records show that you have divided your property on the westerly side of Shipyard Lane and the bay in East Marion. I have not found approval by the Planning Board of a subdivision. A division of any parcel into two or more lots is a subdivision, and the subdivider shall apply to the Planning Board for approval. I am bringing this to your attention so you may apply to the Planning Board. There was also a lot created not adjoining a street. Very truly yours, GHF:bcc cc: Planning Board Richard F. Lark, GEORGE H. FISHER Sr. Building Inspector Esq. a/c Kontokoska " e'w ' ~?1 t' N York State Department of Env,ronmenta Conserva ion Regulatory Affairs Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 516-751-7900 Commissioner Robert F. Flacke June 12, 1979 Ms. Muriel Brush Town of Southold Planning Board Main Street Southold, New York 11971 TW 15278-0143 Emanual Kontokosta Dear Ms. Brush: Pursuant to a recent telephone conversation between Mr. Raynor and Mr. David De Ridder of my office, I am enclosing a copy of our Tidal Wetlands Application, site plan, and EAF (short form). We understand the Town wishes to be designated lead agency under SEQR and are notifying the applicant, Mr. Kontokosta, of this fact by copy of this letter. As we must consider our application incomplete until notified by you of your decision coucerning the significance of the project, please keep us tn- formed of whatever action you may take on this project. Very truly yours, Alternate Lo~l Tidal Wetlands Permit Administrator RLR:ll cc: E. Kontokosta Enc. ^PPh,1] ~, t3 $]ICRT ENV1;[(,|INt:2ITAL A.,.~E.,~MENI' preiarer wilt use cur'rcntty avail, able Infon~ation concerning ~;he proJec~ and the i~e!y Impacts cf' the actlos. It Js not expected that additional s~udiee~ research other investigations will be uuderta~[e~, (b) If an? question has been answered Ye~ the proJec~ ~Y be significant and a (c) If all quOstions have been answered No i$ is likely %~t %his.: project no~ significant, ~d) ~]v il'o~nental Assessment 1, W~I pro~ect result, lu a ]t~rt~e FhysJcal to the pro3ect site or phys:ca~xy alter more X %hah 10 acres of land? . , , , . , , , . - Yes 2, Wil~ Lhe~ be a major change, bo any unique or unusual land form fo%~d on ~h8 si%e? · .... Ygs X... No ), W~i project alter or have a large effsc~ on X an existing body of water? · · , , , · · Yes -- No h. Will pro~ct, b~';o a potentially large impact on grou~%d'.;ater quality? , , · · , , , , , -- Yes--X No 5, Will project significsntly effect drainage fl~ .:~ X Yes No 6, 'Will p,':,Ject affect any bhreat, oue~ or endangered X plant'or animal species? · , · , , , , , Yes . No 7, Will proiect result in a major a,dverse affect cn ~-' X air quality? ........ ' ----Yes----Ilo Yes X NO known to be importan~ %o %he co~,~unity? 1 4 197g-- 9, Will project adversely i~pacb any site or lire cf historic, pre-historic, or paleoa%ok~i~ impol'tallc( Qr any site dnsJ. allate~[ as a cl'J.%~:8t~' D. ~. C. x environmental area b7 a local agency? EN~RON~EiJAL ANA~U~I~ __- iQ. l~tll proJec% have a major ef'fec~ on existing or future recreational opporlmnibies~ , , , Yes ,X 11, Will project result in malor tr~fftc problems or camde a major effect to existing transportation X Yes---- 12, Will project reguiar]y cause objectionable noise~ glare, vibration, ~r 91ectrical distur~ X ance as a result of the project's operation? , ~ · ~ __-- Yes __.- 13,Will ~u'o3ec% have any impact on public health or W~!] pro3ec% ef~'ect th~ ex~t~n~ community by Ho ~ ~~"'~ ~--~ .... Prof Engineer ~LEPAREh o SiGNAl I(E. . - ..... ~ ......... .,. ..... Owner ~ i)ATE: 4/3n/~ .... NEW yORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL C(J~RVATION APPII I~_AT I I'tN ^LSANY, NEW YORK ~2~33 1~ ! .............. FOR ~{MI T APPLICATION NO. ~,.~_~'Article 15 (STREAM PROTECTION) Environmental Conservation Law [] For the construction, reconstruction or repair of a DAM or other impoundment structure. [] For the construction, reconstruction or repair of any permanent DO CK, pier or wharf; and any dock, pier or wherf, built on open work supports, which has a top surface area of more than 200 square feet. [] For the disturbance of a STREAM BED or excavation in or fi|l of navigable waters. [] Article 24 (FRESHWATER WETLANDS) Environmental Conservation Law ~] Article 25 ( TI DAL W ETLAN DS) Environmental Consewation Law Read instructions on reverse side of last sheet before completing this application. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY IN INK. 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT First M.I. Last EJanuel 14. Kontokosts. ~reet 6ddress 6 court Street TELEPHONE NO. 212-&24-~177 Post Office State Brooklyn flew York 2. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If different from Applicant) First M.I. Last Street Address Zip Code Post Office State MAY 1 4 1979 Zip Code 3. AGENCY SUBMIT[lNG APPLICATION No Y. S. D, E. C. PROJECT DATA 4. LOCATION OF WETLAND OR ADJACENT AREA, STREAM, OR BODY OF WATER 8ody of Water Town County Gardt ncr' s BIy Scut, hold sulfa1 k Locate by giving distance and direction from a ceevnonly accepted and identifiabk~ landmark or body of water or U.S.G.S. coordinates. SIZE OF WC)RK SECTION 6. SPECIFIC LOCATION J7. WILL PROJECT UTILIZE STATE NED LANDS~ Dept. Publlc works 14ap-E2 456 O00;N 32710~[~yes ~]No TYPE AND EXTENT OF WORK (Feet of new channel; yards of material to be removed, draining, dredBins, fillinB, etc.) Pro,eot to be located vtthtn 300 ft of LZ zone 9. DOES PROJECT COMPLY WITH A. Use Guidelin(~s (If any) NO I B. Develolmlent Restrictions (If any} 10. PUR~SE (j To construct 28 apartment dwelling units and 21 motel units with accessory coffeeShop vtthtn 300 ft of LZ zone. P&rcel ts 9.2 acres. OR OBSTRUCTION, INDICATE Height Size of Pond 13. APpROXImATE COMPLETION DATE 11/82 14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF ~O OFFICIAL NEWSPAPE~ iN LOCALI~ WHERE P~SED ACTIVITY IS EOCATED 1. Suffolk Ttmes 2. Long Island Traveler ¥&tchJao . ~aJn Road One East Rate Street greenport, Ney York 11944 Rfverhead, Ney York CERT~FLCATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury J~t information provided on this form and alt attachments submitted here- with is true to the best of my knowled§e and ~lief. False s~ate~n~s made herein are punishable as ~ Class A misde~a~o~ pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. As a condition ~o the issuance of a ~rmit, ~he ~pplic~m ~ccep~s full lc;al res~nsibiliJy for all d8~e, dired or indirect, of whatever ~tu;e, and by whomeve; suffered, arisin~ out of the projec~ described herein and a~rees)o i~d~ify a~ save h~rmless ~he Sta~e from suits,actions, ~da~ges and costs of every na~ and description resulting from the said pmjem:'-~ DATE ~" SIGNATU~ (2~7) - SEE EEVE~E SIDE - FRANK S. COYLE HENRY E. RAYNOR. Jr. FREDERICK E. GORDON JAMES WALL Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold, N.Y. 11971 june 4, 1979 TELEPHONE 765- 1938 Mr. Roy L. Haje Environmental Analysis Unit Building 40 - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: TW 15278-0143 Emanuel Kontokosta Dear Mr. Haje: In reference to the above application for a Tidal Wetlands Permit to the Dept. of Environmental Conservation, we submit the following. Mr. Kontokosta has indicated that he anticipates he may have some environmental problems with this project and has elected to go to the Dept. of Environmental Conservation first. Because he has not submitted an application for site plan approval to this board at this point nor made application to the Board of Appeals for the special exceptions this pro~ect will require, we feel we cannot request lead agency status nor comment on the proposal. At the time when Mr. Kontokosta makes application to this board we would like to declare our status with regard to this project. Yours truly, HER/mb HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD New York Slate Department of Environmental Conservation Environmental Analysis Unit Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 516-751-7900 Commissioner Robert F. Flacke Muriel Brush Southold Town Planning Board Main Street Southold, New York 11971 Re: TW 15278-0143 Emanuel Kontokosta Dear Ma. Brush: We have received the above referenced tidal wetlands application to construct a one family dwelling (copy enclosed). While this project is unlisted making coordination optional, we should like to know if you desire lead agency status, and, if so, your determination of significance for the project. Your response by 6/5/79 would be appreciated. Ve~ truly~yo~r~, Roy"L. Haje ~ Alternate Local Tidal Wetlands Permit Administrator RLH:ll Enc o After investigation~d inspection, the Board ~lds that the applicant requests permission to erect a 28-unit apartment complex with 21 motelunits and an accessory coffee shop at premises located in an "M-1 Multiple Resi- dence District." The present zoning ordinance would allow for boarding or tourist houses, or multiple residences for not more than four families; however, for the use requested herei~ a Special Exception is required by this Board. Applicant's Site Development Plan as revised 11/28/79 appears to be in conformance with all the rules and regulations of the zoning ordinance and this Board has been informed that the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation and Suffolk County Department of Health Services permit applications appear to be approvable as revised 11/28/79. The Board finds that the circumstances present in this case are unique, and that strict application of the ordinance would produce practical dif- ficulties or unnecessary hardship. The Board believes that the grant of a Special Exception in this case will not change the character of the neigh- borhood and will observe the spirit of the ordinance. On motion made by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED, that EMANUEL M. KONTOKOSTA, 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York 11201, BE GRANTED a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance for permission to erect a 28-unit apartment complex with 21 motel units and accessory coffee shop as per the revised Site Development Plan dated 11/28/79, and SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1, Approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. 2. Approval from the New York State Department of Environmental COnservation. 3. Approval from the Southold Town Planning Board for Site Plan. 4.' Approval from the Suffolk County Planning Commission pursuant to Section 1331 of the Suffolk County Charter. 5. Approval from the Suffolk County Health Department for the sewage''- disposal systems. 6. No further subdivision except by application and approval from the Southold Town Planning Board and Board pf Appeals, and appropriate other agencies when required. 7.' No residential structUre shall be located within 100 feet of the mean highwater line. 8.. No sanitary disposal facility shall be constructed or installed within 100 feet of mean highwater line. 9. A conservation buffer or easement having a minimum width of 50 feet shall be established along the shoreline. 10. No storm-water runoff resulting from the development and improve- ment of the pending subdivision and any of the lots shall be discharged directly into Gardiners Bay.- 11. No loudspeakers or other noise-making devices may be permitted which would disturbthA-neighborhood.. 12. The coffee shop is permitted for use exclusively for the motel- apartment occupants, and shall not be permitted for use by the general public. Location of property: Westerly side of Shipyard Lane, East Marion; bounded north by Parkside Heights Co., east by Shipyard Lane, south by Gardiners Bay, west by Parkside Heights Co. County Tax Map 'Item No. 1000-38-7- part of Lot 4. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Absent: Messr. DQ.~glass. · APPROVED Messrs. Grigonis, Tuthill and Doyen. !~EW YOEK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL C~'BERV&T!ON i APPLICATION FOR RMIT ~ A~icle 15 (STflEA~I PROTECTION) Environmental Conservation Law ~ For the construction, reconstruction or repair of a DAM or other impoundment structure. ~ For the construction, re~nstruction or repai~ of any permanent DOCK, pier or ~harf; and any dock, pier or wharf, built on open work supports, ~hich has a top surface area of more than 200 square feet. ~ For the disturbance of a STREAM BED or excavation in or fill of navigable waters. ~ Article24 (FRESHWATER WETLANDS)Environmental Conservation Law ~ Article 25 (TIDAL WETLANDS) Environmental Conservation Law Read instructions nfl reverse side of last sheet Before completin~ this application. PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY IN INK. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT First M.h Last E m a n u_e 1 _~.!, ..... ~Ko~ n_t_o k_o_s_t_a., S r er Address ~ Court Street Post Office State Brookl y_n_ ttew NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If differenl from Applicant) Street Address 1.12.~ 1 Post office State Zip Code MAY 1 4 1979 z,~:.~. -. :'t ' 3. AGENCY SUBMI1T'ING APPLICATION N.Y.S.D.E.C. PROJECT DATA LOCATION OF WETLAND OR ADIACENT AREA, STREAM, OR BODY OF WATER Body ol Water Town County r, ardtner's Bay Southnld Locate by giving distance and direction from a commonly accepted and identifiable landmark or body of water or U.S.C.S. coordinates. 117, WJLLPROJECT bTILIZE STATE ~'Dept,SPECIFiC /i~I~/NED LANDS? Public works Hal)-E2 456 dn0;N 32710,,,.~yes ~No 5. SIZE OF WORX SECTION LOCATION I~. TYPE AND EXTENT OF WORK (Feet of new channel; yards of material to be removed, draining, dredging, filling, etc.) Project to be located within l~lfl ft of LZ zone DOES PROJECT COMPLY WITH A. Use Guidelines (If a~ly) ~JO J 8. Development Restrictions (If any( PURPOSE (HardsJ~ip) To construct 28 apartment dwelling units and 21 ~mtel units coffee shop within 300 ft of LZ zone. Parcel is 9.2 acres. with accessory 11, IF A DAM OR OBSTRUCTION, INDICATE Height Size of Pond ~4 i . NAME AND ADDRESS OF TWO ©PFICIAL NEWSPAPERS IN LOCALITY WHERE PROPOSED ACTIVITY IS EOCATED 12. PROPOSED STARTING DATE DATE 11 / 79 ~ I 1/82 13~, A~ROXJ)4ATE COMPLETION 1. Suffolk Times Hain Road Greenoort, New York 11944 Long Island Traveler ~!atchman One East 14atn Street ~Iverhead, New York CERTIFICATION I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury that information provided on this form and all attachments submitted here- with is true to the best of my knowledge and betiei. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal Law. AS a condition to the issuance oi~ a permit, the applicant accepts full legal responsibility for ali damage, direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whomever suffered, arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits,actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from the said ploject. 4/30/7q DATE SIGNATURE NEW YOi9( S'IATE E,r(i'7.I",'P~iENT ~,i: EUVIRONU?NTAL COiI2EilVATIO I PROJECT PE~IIT REO~I'I .... Rt..ICl T OUESTIO?INAI'!?', The purpose of this questionnaire is to assist the applicant in determining what, if any, Department Permits or approvals must be obtained before startinc work on a proposed project. If you are not sure if the action proposed is a regulated activity or is within an area subject to Department regulations (tidal wetlands, freshwater wetlands, etc.) contact onr regional office for clarification. A pre- application conference with our staff to obtain guidance in the Department's permit application review process can be arranged. __~NS!,rER ALL QUESTIONS N.~diE OF APPLICA~!T: E. M. Kontokosta, p.e. for Kontokosta Associates DETAILED PEOJECT DESCP, IPTION & LOCATIOM: Propose to construct 28 apartment dwelling units and 21 motel units with accessory use coffee shop. 1. Realty Subdivision Approvals in Ilassau Connty YES Does project involve subdivision of land into 5 or more residential lots that will be served by a public or community sewage disposal system? X 2. Minir.~ Permit Does project involve the ~,~lnin~ and commercial sale or off-site use of 1,000 tens of miperal within 12 calendar months (excepting excavation or grading in connection with on site construction or farming)? X._~' 3. Air Contaminatio? Permit a) ~"~ or I.~odifie~ Sonrcos~ ~. Does project involve the const~mtion, modification '~or operation of a boiler greater than 1 million BTU/hr rated heat input, an incinerator or an industrial pro- X tess? b) Indirect Source' Does project involve construction or highway~ airport or a parking facility more spaces? 4. Solid Uaste ?Iana~e~_n_ent Permit M~'f Does project involve the storage, transfer, proce~szng or disposal of solid waste? ~,,~..~ -' ~ X 5. !/ild~ Scenic & Recreational Rivers Permit Only aoplies to certain lands witb£n a~,.~; mil~. ....... the Carmans River. Consult D.E.C. Regional Office for exact determination. 6. Water Supply Per,it Does project involve the acquisition of land or con- struction of facilities for water supply or distri- bution purposes? X 7. Lon~ Island Well Permit a) Does project involve the construction of a new well or deepening or increasing the capacity of an existing well to witbdraw water at a rate greater than 45 gallons a ~inute? X b) Uill project reqoire the ten'porary lowerin~ of grouudwater levels for construction purposes? 8. Protection of Uaters a) Will project chauge, modif~ or otherwise dis- turb the cosrse~ chai1Eel or bed of any stream classified C(T) or higher? (Consult tile Regional· Gffice for classifications). X b) Does project involve the temporary or per- manent artificial obstruction of a natural stream or watercourse? X c) Does project involve the construction or re- pair of a permanent dock~ pier or wharf having a top surface area more than 200-square feet? X .... d) Does project involve any excavation or placing of fill in the navigable waters of the State and adjacent wetlands? X × NOT NO IINO! ~1 - 2 - 9. Tidal I'Tetlands Permit I. Will project be located~ a) in tidal waters, b) within 300-feet of either the landward edge of a tidal wetland boundary or a tidal body if water. NOT YES NO KKOWN X II. Will there be any subdivision of land or physical X alterations of land or water? Exemptions to the above regulated locations if: 1) Project will be located at a ground elevation of 10-feet or higher above mean sca level (excepting on the face of a bluff or cliff). X 2) A substaatial, man-made structure (such as a paved street or bulkhead) 100-feet or longer exists between the project site and tidal wetlands or tidal water. (Consult D.E,C. Regional Office X if unsure.) 10, Freshwater Wetlands Permit a) Will project area be within, or within i00-feet of, a freshwater wetland or freshwater body of 12.4 acres or larger? X b) Will project iuvolve draining, dredging~ filling, excavating, erecting structures, roads, utilities or other alterations or placing any form of pollution in a wetland? (Consult D.E.C. Regional Office if unsure). X 11. Section 401 - Uater ~uality Certification Letter Does project or activity require a Federal Permit or License? If so~ this State certification may be required prior to Federal approval 12. State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Permit Does project involve: a) A proposed subdivision of 5 or mo ~-~.~) A proposed or existing discharge of 1~000 gallons per day of sewage or any disch~fi~' of industrial or other wastes to ground waters? N.Y.S.D.E.C- X C) Any discharge of sewage, industria~N~0NM~N~AtANA~ ~ X other wastes to surface water? d) Any disposal of stormwater containing sewage industrial or other wastes? X e) Any storage and disposal of potentially toxic or hazardous wastes? X 13.The following additional required D.E.C. permits have been applied for: Type of Appli. Permit No. A_j?lication Filing Date Nome Applicant's Name (If different from application now being submitted) 14. List all other permits, licenses or approvals required by other agencies of government: T~e of Permit Governmental Status pr Approval Agency N0,e I certify that the above iD£6i~tion ~i~ corr~t to t~e ~est ofzmy knowledge. ~ ~ /% / ......... C-~ '~ DATE S-IG~',i~TUP~E OF APPLIC~NT,~R AOTH~RI~ ~P~SENTATI~ 0 CLEAVES POINT VILLAGE SITE PLAN scale:l"=lO0' '? d~AUTHORIZED ALTERA' THIS SURVEY IS A V SE~TION 7209 OF THE d '/ ,/, ;bo Notice c~ Hearings I~YrIcE ~, IS HEREBy GIVEN tl~i ~ ~o Snc- tion 276 of tbe Tow~ Law Publi¢~Heerings will be held by the Soathold To~n Plan- ning Board at the_Town Hall, Main Road, Soufhold, New York, in said town on the 14th day of November, 1979 on the question ~f the following: 7:~0 p.m. Approval of the min~ subdivision of property of ~enn and Rhnda Kaplan situate, lying and being at East Marion in the Town of Soathold, County of Suffolk and ~tnte of New Yo~k, b~d. ed and'deseribnd ai fo~ows: BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the southerly line of Main Road with the west~e of Shipyard Lane and i~4~[ng along said west- erly line of Shipyard Lane ~ cOurses: (1) S. 36' 36' 10' E. ~.'.~.33 feet; thence (2) S. 50'~ 50' 30" E. ~2.~2 feet; thene~ (3) S. 35° 41' 50" E. 643.1~ feet to land Of Parkside Heights Company; thence along said land two eoaree~: (1) S. 50' 16' 00" W. ~00.13 feet; thence (2) S. 11° 49' 50" W. $~ feet, more or less, to ordinar~ high water mark of Gardiners Bay; thence west- erly along said high water mark 400 f~et, more or l.esq, to land of Eavanangh; thence along said land Of Kavanangh foureoar~ee: (1) N. 11· 49' 30" E. 467 fee~, more or less feet; thence (3) N. 50' 30' ~0" W. 4,27.54 feet; thence (4) S. 58° 49' 10" W. 87.~9 feet to land of Dawn Estates Shopping Center; thence along said land of Dawn Estates Shopping Center, other land of Kavan- augh, and land of North Fork Equities, Inc. N. 33' 22' 50" W. 812.15 feet; thence eontinning along said land of North Fork Equities, inc., N. 34' 34' 40" W. 1067.74 feet to the southerly line of Main Road; thence along said southerly line of Main Road four eourees: (1) N. 71' 44' 30" E. 93.75 feet; theeee (2) N. 77' 42' 30" E. 221.37 feet; thence (3) N. 64° 53' 30" E. 115.23 feet; thence (4) N. 57° ~0' 40" E. 430.21.feet to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom a parcel of land conveyed to the State of New York for drainage purposes. Containing 44.895 ,f~:~ p.m. ApProval of the minor subdivision of property of E. M. Kontokesta situate, lying and being at East Mar- ion in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and Slate of New York, being more par- ticularly bounded and describ- ed as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the southwesterly side of Ship- yard Lane distant 2458.97 feet southerly from the corner formed by the intersection of _the southerly side of Main Road (~q.Y.S. Route 50) wi~ the southwesterly side of Ship~ side of Shipyard Lane 755 feet to the ordinary high water line of Gardiners Bay; thence along the ordinary high water line of Gardiners Bay the following four tie line courses and distances: (1) S. 37° 28' 00" W. 346,66 feet; (2) N. 33' 40" W. 201.57 feet; (3) N. 69° O6' 3O" W. 367.50 feet; N. 76* 11' 20" W. :11)0.18 feet to land now or formerly of Dawn Estates Shopping Center; thence N. 11' 49' 30" E. along the last mentioned land 480 feet to land of Parkside Heights Co.; thence along said land of Parkside Heights Co, the following two courses and distances: (1) N. 85° 45' 20" E. 229.70 feet; and (2) N. 55° 16' 00" E. 340 feet to the south- westerly side of Shipyard Lane at the point or place of begin- 30' Containing 13.182 acres. p.m Approval of the inor sulr sion of property of John C. ,.,d Frank J. Diller situate, lying and being at Peconic in the Town of South- old, County of Suffolk and State of N ", York, bounded and desc] . as follows: BEGINNtNG at a point on the northerly line of Middle Road at the southwesterly corner of the premises herein described and being the south- easterly corner of land of Simon Estate; running thence along said land of Simon Es- tate three courses: (1) N. 34° 22' 30" W. 307.66 feet; thence (2) N. 45' 45' 30" W. 2827.53 ~Y OF SUFFOLK. : OF NEW YORK. ~ss: W. 113.0 feeti thence (2) S. 43° 44' 4O" W. 5.65 feet to the point of beginnh~g. C~taining 4.182 ~, heard ~n the abeve n~ttors should appear at the Lime and place above ~ified~ Dated: N~b~r I l~/~ ': ' 'BY ORDER OF THE*SOUTHOLO ~OWN i~ PLANNING BOARD HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR., CHAB1MAN tat .~. F... is Printer and Publisher of the SUFFOLK LY TIMES, a newspaper published at Greenport, in said ~ and that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed has been published in the said Suffolk Weekhr Times ~ e~ch week, for .... Q~: ................... weeks siwly eommencin~ on the ...e.~g}!t..h ................ · ,'~ou~be~r ......... 19.7.9 ......... ~:~ V'.~.%-....~5..4~:~ fT....w- ......... e ,me ~iis ., .... .,: , Sound; thence easterly along said high water mark 475 feet, more or less, to a point on the westerly line of land of Ross, said point being N. 67° 17' 40" E. 476.05 feet from the last described point; thence along said land of Ross S. 46° 25' 50" E. 666.77 feet to land of Mor- gan; thence along said land of Morgan S. 46° 55' 20" E. 521.68 feet; thence continuing along said land of Morgan and along land of Minakyan S. 46° 35' 30" E. 1794.90 feet; thence con- tinuing along said land of Minakyan three courses: (1) S. 46° 21' 10" E. 704.20 feet; thence (2) S. 46° 17' 20" E. 364.33 feet; thence (3) S. 46° 52' E. 1171.20 feet to said northerly line of Middle Road; thence along said northerly line of Middle Road three courses: (1) S. 70° 45' W. 4.0 feet; thence (2) S. 71° 30' W. 639.0 feet; thence (3) S. 66° 11' W..00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 53.649 acres. Excepting therefrom 2.589 acres conveyed to the County of Suffolk. 9:00 p.m. Approval of the minor subdivision of property of William L. and Muriel A. Murray situate, lying and be- ing at Cutchogue in the Town of Soathold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bound- ed and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monu- ment set on the northerly line of Main Road 572.7 feet easter- ly along said line from the easterly line of Cox's Lane, said monument being the southwesterly corner of the premises herein described and the southeasterly corner of land of Halikias; running thence along said land of Halikias and along land of Cox Lane Associates N. 43° 05' 20" W. 756.06 feet to a monument: thence continuing along said land of Cox Lane Associates three courses: (1) N. 43° 44' 40" E 5.65 feet; thence (2) N. 23° 44' E. 166.46 feet: thence (3) N. 31° 04' E. 103.51 feet to a monument and land of Robin- son; thence along said land of Robinson S. 43° 33' E, 650.75 feet to a monument and land of Brynda; thence along said land of Brynda two courses: (1) S. 38° 25' W. 150.13 feet to a monument; thence (2) S. 43° 53' E. 158.71 feet to said northerly line of Main Road; thence along said northerly line two courses: (1) S. 37° 37' feet; thence (3) N'45°52'50" JO!~i ~AoT., O~ being duly Sworn. W. 1985 feet to ordinary high '~ 1TM~,r ' 1TN8-5021 - water mark of Long Island FILE NO. $-,5D-79-16 SUFFOLK CO. PLANNING DEPI SUB,D Rg~I',:W SECTION DECEMBER 5~ 1979 BY: '~he subdivision of this parcel, as proposed, has been approved by the Suf£olk County Plannin~ Co-~tssion subject to 5 conditions deemed neces- sa. fy to help preserve the natural and aesthetic ~ttributes of (~,a~ ~ i/"~ ~"~: 8aT. Refer to letter for cond{tions. iA I~ &~ 1416~J ~(A/D ~*/~J OWNER OF ADJACENT PARI<GIDE MEIGHT¢ &P~ P,O~ ¢70* or-ffrr.'/T Hob~ q. M R K GRAPHIC SCALE; ZONING ANALYSIS', REFERENC:E¢ zONIhI6~ CHAPTER I00 FROM THE CODE THE TOWN OF' 50UTHOLD SLTE/, ZONE M4~ ~ENERAL RESIDENCE DISTRICT AREA;9,IgD,qCRE~ OR 400~-/08, LOT COVERA6E; ALLOWABLE; REF, PARKIN~ ~'BOU< SCHEDULE A5 Aid F--N DED PROPOSED',(Z)APT BLDG, =13,750 ~ (2)I'qOTEL BLDG= 15,050 ,, (1) ACCES$OR'f 4, Z~_5 TOTAL 3~,0 25 I~ % COV ERASE', 33,ozs = ,o8 -- 8% 40Q~?08 DWELLING UNIT ALLOWABLE; APT UNIT: 9000 [~ LOT ~OTEL UNIT: 60001~1 LOT AREA REF; IO0, H6) PROPOSED; 2.SAPT UNITe: ZD2,000 2_1 ~QTEL UNITD= i'&G,O00 37B,000 E~] ~78,000E~ (400,708~ .'. DENSITY OK BLD6 LENGTH ALLOWABL6 ¢ ~'2-~* MAX, LE~iCTH ¢EPARATION REQUIRED ', ~0~OR Zx BLOC {REF', 100,SZ) HEICHT OF BLOC=, REF, RIDCE TO FINISH 8RAPE ~ FRONT OF BLDC. ¢~OPOSED', LENETH', I~~ HEICHT: DISTANCE BETWEEN 0LD85:40 DIDT. BET, BLP6, &AC. CES$. Lt\/ABLE FLOOR I'~IN, ALLOWED: 8,~0 I~ AREA'. PROPOGED; 9~.0 I~ ($fdALLEST ~JNIT) (REF. O0. OI=~-¢TREET (REP. PARI<,IN6 & BUL.J4 PARKING ', REQUIRED; 2.8 CAR5 - APT¢' PROPOSED; ~-8 CARS -APT~, 34 C, AR~ - MOTEL.5 SET BACKS (,REF, PARKING & BULK SCHEDULE) FRONT YARD: REQUIRED: 50' PROPOGED ', DO* ON~. 5i06 'YARD',REQUI RED ,' 7-O~ ~0THSIDEYARD'.REQUIRED~, 45~ PROPOGED~ 100' REAR YAR. D ,~ REQ, UIRED', DOI pROPOSED,~ I00I BLD6. HEI6HT'(REF. pAr~KIN6 & Bt,iLl< PP,OPOSEP; ~.01 I<,EY ' ........ EXICT IN6 Revisions 6X f.STI N'~ EO~ TOUI~$ '17-') F~E~IAIN f',16 W rONTOUI~$ KoNToKOSTA ASSOCIATES Sn~i,~eers & Architects Date ,,. 26 Cour,t Street, Brooklyn, New York 11201 PROPOSED¢ SHIPYARD LANE. PROJECT Title SITE ,z_T179 ' . Scale I"= 501 ' Job No. DEVELOPMENT Dwg No '