The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-40.-4-1 WHEREAS, o petition was heretofore filed with the Town Board of the Town of Southold by ........... ~.~./jl~........~. ~.~'. .................................................. requesting a change, modification and amendment of the Building Zone Ordinance including the Building Zone Maps made a part thereof by chang- ing from .".~..;~l~l.,....~..~g~..~f~.*.... District to .~..~1~.~'..~.~'~.....!~..~.~~'~ District the property described in said petition, and WHEREAS said petition was duly referred to the Planning Board for its investigation, recommendation and report, and its report having been filed with the Town Board, and thereafter, a public hearing in relation to said petition having been duly held by the Town Board on the ....... '/.~......doy of ...... I~/~' ....................... , 19~..~...., and due deliberation having been had thereon NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the relief demanded in said petition be, and it hereby is B~It'BC~ aa o£ l~oven~c~x' X7. t'ovn o£ ~ou~:hold PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 15, 1995 Thomas H. Wickham, Supervisor Members of the Town Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Annexation of Geier Property from Southold Town to Greenport Village Dear Supervisor Wickham and Members of the Town Board, On the issue of whether to permit the Village of Greenport to annex the Geier property from the Town of Southold, the Planning Beard wishes to offer the following recommendation: if the Town Board wishes to approve the annexation by the Village that the proposed use or uses of the property be set forth clearly by the Village prior to a vote to permit annexation. The Town should be' apprised of this information so as to be able to judge the effect the proposed use or uses might have on the Town, whether they be positive or negative. Richard G. Ward Chairman JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK I{EGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MAI~RiAG E OFFICER RECORDS. MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFOI/MATION OFIqCER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determinatlon of Si~m~ificance Town Board of the Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: July 12, 1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. .The.lead agency has detern~n.' ed that the proposed action described below will not have a s~gmficant effect on the envaronment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Actiom SEQR Status: Project Description: Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCFM# 10OO40 ~. 1 ~rs CR 48, 400 feet w/o Moore's Iane, Unincorporated eenport Type I Action The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves a the change of zone of 10_q5 acres from "Hamlet Density" to "Residence-80.". The project site contains freshwater wetlands assoaated wath Moore's Woods (NYSDEC Freshwater Water Wetlands #SO-l). The site is surrounded by Village of Greenportparkland. The proposed project is one of six (6) change, of zones being considered by the Town Boardat this t, me in the same geographic area and will involve common and potentially siEnificant impacts. · HD' Change of Zone SEQR Determination 1000-40-4-1 Location: The site consists of 10.55 acres and is located on the south side of CR 48, 400 feet west of Moore's Lane, Unincorporated Greenport. Comments** The Town Board is reviewing this project simultaneously with the followin~ applications: Change of Zon~ on Town Board's Own Motion $C'I~I# 1000-40-3-1 s/s CR 48, more than 1000' e/o Chapal Laa~, Gre~nport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 1000-35.1-25 n/s CR 48, 1,139 fcct e/o Sound Road, Gre~nport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 1000-4.5-2-10.5 e/s Chapel Lane, Grccnport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 1000-45-2-1 s/s CR 48, 805 feet e/o Chal~l Lan~, Gre~nport Propof~.d COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 1000-3.5-1-24 n/s CR 48, 564 feet c/o Sound Road, Gre~nport Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: (1) The sRbje, ct eh~n? Of zonin~ does aot ex~ ~y ~ ~ ~ f~ ~e~inin~ ~ifi~ ~ n ~on ~fal ~ ~ pr~din~ sup~ for ~ ~ a N~ D~om Th~ Wopof~.d project will re~tuc~ tl~ potential d~vclopmcat deasity on the mxbject ~ite. A~ a result, dr~i~y derived impacts indudinU water us~; s~nitary wast~ volume; disturbanc~ of land; traffic generation; and solid waste generation will also I~ rezluced. Accordingly, the subject rhan~e of zonin~ is expexied to reduce the impact of site d~velopme~t with regard to these impact areas, a~ compared to current zonin~ The proposed zeroing is consisteat with land use and zoning of surrounding lands, and will therefore not caus~ a ~io~nifieant impact. A~ a re. suit, thc proposed vhan~e of zonin~o ~ haV~ & be.~ficlal impact upon land u~e i- the area of the site. Page2 of 3 "HI~ Chnn~oe Of Zone SEQR Determination (4) Considernfi,~n has been given to the review of the prolx~d zone change conducted by a consultant to the Town Board, which concludes ~e following wRh regard to the site in consideration of unique site resources: 'Th_ese flndln~ sugges~ that any development on this site will have environmental impacts. Our initial impression is that rezonin~ to "R-80' residential will provide a ~i~ifiennt increased measure of protectioa for the environment than th~ "I-ID' zonln~ HOW provides. (~) Cons~derntion has been given to a plnnning doc~nent prepared by the Sonthold plnnnlng Staff entitle~d, "Rev~v of Haralet DensiO~ Zoning i~ $outhold Town - Report to t~e Town Board" dated February 1994. This repo~ concludes the following with regard to the s~e in conslderakon of unique site resources: (6) The subject site cont~in~ unique resources, and is occupied by freshwater wetlands over appro~mately 33 p~rce.~t of the 10-~5 acre site. The proposed ehan~o~ of zonin~ W~l minimiT~ impac~ upon wetlands resources by redu,'~ng the po~¢nHal land use density adjacent this habitat: In addition, the lower potentlnl land use densily will provide more flexible land use options to ma~dmiTe setbacks and ensure preservation of unique habitat areas. For Further Information: Contact Person: Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold Address: Phone No.: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1800 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commi.~sioner-Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12231 Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation, SUNY @ Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY Suffolk County planning Cornmksion Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYS Lec~islative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Lono Island Southold Town Plannin9 Board~'~-~ Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Buildin{j Department Villaoe of Greenport Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board John Geier g Ano., cio Marion Geier, Atlantic Mobil Park, P.O. Box 30, Newport, N.C. 28570 l~ge 3 of 3 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Ma~ S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 June 27, 1994 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mrs. Terry: Change of Zone on Town Board's Own Motion: SCTM % 1000-40-4-1 - J. Geier SCTM % 1000-35-1-25 - LBV Properties SCTM % 1000-45-2-10.3 - Richard Mohring (a.k.a. San Simeon Retirement Community Inc.) SCTM % 1000-45-2-1 - Siolas & Tsunis SCTM ~ 1000-35-1-24 - Jem Realty SCTM ~ 1000-40-3-1 - KACE Realty At its June 24th meeting, the Planning Board adopted the following report: The Planning Board endorses the townspeople's vision for their Town, which calls for individually distinct or discrete hamlets separated from each other by open or farmed countryside, and which calls for the equitable distribution of affordable housing density throughout the Town. The Planning Board also recognizes that achieving this vision will require the careful consideration of the land use within and adjacent to its hamlet centers; that the Town's Zoning Map should reflect the intent of the community's vision; and that the Town must weigh the community's interest in its collective future against the private interest of individual property owners in the use of their land. The Planning Board recognizes that the proposed rezoning of these properties will not deny these property owners the right or capacity to develop their land; that the proposed zone of R-80 is the base zoning of the Town and is by no means the most restrictive zoning categorization in Southold. The Planning Board endorses the report: "Review of Hamlet Density Zoning in Southold Town: Report to the Town Board", and its recommendation that the zones of these six properties be changed from Hamlet Density to a lower density such as R-80. Chairman JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRJAG E OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FI~EEDOM OF INFO}~AATION OFFICER Town HaLl, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Tclcphone (516) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 20, 1994 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith map of of a proposed change of zone on the Town Board's own motion from Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District to Low Density Residential R-80 District on the property of John Geier and Another, located on the south side of Route 48, 400 feet west of Moore's Lane, Greenport, N.Y. Please prepare an official report with respect to the proposed change of zone, and transmit same to me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry $outhold Town Clerk Attachment JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTIOM~ OF VITAL STA'i]STICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765 1823 Telephone (516) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Dotcrmlnatloll of Non~ignificence De~rmination of $1Enificance Town Board of the Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Data' May 31, 1994 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: SEQR Status: Project Description: Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SC'TM# 100040-4-1 ~s CR 48, 400 feet w/o Moore's Lane, Unincorporated reenport Unlisted Action The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves a the change of zone of 10.55 acres from 'Hamlet Density' to "Residence-80". The project site Page 1 of 3 'HD' Change of Zone SEQR Determination contains freshwater wetlands associated with Moore's Woods (NYSDEC Freshwat. er Water Wetlands #SO-l). The site is surrounded, by Village of Greenportparldand. The proposed project ~s one of six (6) change of zones being considered by the Town Boardat this time in the eeo a hic area and will involve common and sam g grp . potentially s~gnificant Lmpacts. 1000404 1 Location: The site consists of 10_55 acres and is located on the south side of CR 48, 400 feet west of Moore's Lane, Unincorporated Greenport. Comments: The Town Board is reviewing this project simultaneously with the following applications: Change of Zone on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 100040-3-1 s/s CR 48, more than 1000' e/O Chapel [.an% Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 1000-35-1-25 n/s CR 48, 1,139 feet e/o Sound Road, Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 1000-45-2-103 e/s Chapel Lane, Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 100045-2-1 s/s CR 48, 805 feet c/o Chapel Lane, Greenport Proposed COZ on Town Board's Own Motion SCTM# 1000-35-1-24 n/s CR 48, 564 feet ¢/o Sound Road, Greenport Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and IL and the following specific reasons: (1) Thc subject change of zoning doca not e. xeeexi any of the criteria for determining significance of an action that would warrant the preparation of a Draft EIS. Conversely, the action will mlnlmi~,¢ potential environmental impacts thereby provMing support for issuance of a Negative Declaration. (2) The proposed project will reduce the potential development density on the subject site. As a result, density derived impacts indudin~ water uae; sanitary waste volume; disturbance of land; traffic generation; and solid waste generation will also be reducexL Accordingly, the subject change Of zoning ill Page2 of 3 Change of Zone SEQR Determination expexted to reduce the impact of site development with regard to these impact areas, as compared to ¢llri'ent zoning The proposed zo,~i-g is consistent with land uae and zoning Of surrounding lands, and will therefore not cause a ~igni6cant impact. As a result, the proposed ,'hange of zoning will have a beneficial impact upon land use in the area of the site. (4) Consideration has been given to the review of the proposed zone change conducted by a collsnltant to the Town Board, which concludes the following with regard to the rate ia consideration of unique site resources: '['hese findings St~ge.,st that any development on this sitc will have cnviromncntal impacts. OUr initial impression is that rezoning to 'R-8ff' rc6idontial will provide a ~i~nific. ant iacreasexl measure of protextlon for the environment *h~n the 'I-ID' zoning now provides. (5) Consideration has been given to a pla.nlng document prepared by the Southold planning Staff entitled, "Review of Hamlet Density Zoning in $outhoM Town - Report to the Town Board" dated February 1994. This report condudea the following with regard to the site ia considesaiton of unique site resourcea: "This parcel could be developed in a manner not requiring multiple density uses. Rezoning to a lower density i~ recommended." (~) The subject site contaln~ unique resources, and is occupied by freshwater wetlands over approximately 33 percent of th~ 10.55 acre site. The proposed change of zoning wi~ mlnim]Te impact upon wetlands resources by reducing the potential land use density adjacent ~ habitat. In addition, the lower potential land use density will provide more flexible land uae options to maxlmiTe setbacks and ensure preservation of unique habitat areas. For Further Information: Contact Person: Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold Address: Phone No.: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1800 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, NY 12231 Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation, SUNY @ Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY SuffoLk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island Southold Town Planning Board~ Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Village of Greenport Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin 13oard John Geier & Ano., c/o Marion Geier, Atlantic Mobil Park, P.O. Box 30, Newport, N.C. 28570 Page3 of 3 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK RI*2GISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECOI~DS MANAGEMENri' OFEICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765 182~ Telephone (516) 765 1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 11, 1994 Lead Agency Coordination Request l?. APR I 3 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD The purpose of this request is to determine under Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental and 6NYCRR Part 617 the following: Article 8 (State Conservation Law 1. your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed you will find the $outhold Town Board's findings and a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: John Geier & Another, c/o Marion Geier, Atlantic Mobil Park, P.O. Box 30, Newport, N.C. 28570, SCTM #1000-40-4-1, property located on the south side of Route 48, 400 feet west of Moores Lane, Greenport, N.Y., containing 10.55 acres. Requested Action: Change of Zone on the Town Board's own motion from Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District to Low Density Residential R-80 District. SEQRA Classification: Type I Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk, Town of Southold The lead agency will determine the need for a environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. If you have an interest in being lead agency, please contact this office immediately. If no response is received from you within 30 days of the date of this letter, it will be assumed that your agency has no interest in being lead agency. Page 2 A~lency Position: [ ] This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. [X] This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. [ ] Other. (See comments below) Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry $outhold Town CIorR Enclosures Copies of this request and all attachments to the following: Commissioner Langdon Marsh, NYS-DEC, Albany Robert Greene, NYS-DEC, Stony Brook NYS ,Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Department of Health Services Southold Town Planning Board/ Southold Town Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk's Bulletin Board (without attachments) John Geier & Ano., c/o Marion Geier, Atlantic Mobil Park, P.O. Village of Greenport Box 30, Newport, N.C. 28570 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MAR[IlAG E OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southol& New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 5. 1994: OWNER PARCEL g 1000-40-4-1 JOHN CEIER & ANO., c/o Marion Geier Atlantic Mobil Park P.O. Box 30 Newport, NC 28570 PROPERTY LOCATION South Side Route 48 400 Feet West of Moores Lane Greenport, New York 11944 WHEREAS, the Master Plan of the Town of Southold and the recommendations of the Town's advisory Stewardship Task Force have increasingly emphasized the promotion of growth in and around the hamlet centers, to strengthen their business prospects while keeping open space and farmland undeveloped; and WHEREAS, the Town..Board has examined and extensively discussed a report entitled "Review of Hamlet Density Zoning in the Town of Southold" dated February 1994 which assessed the appropriateness of the zoning of all undeveloped HD zoned properties in the Town of Southold; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the Town of Southold concludes that HD zoning of this property is not appropriate for the following reasons: The property has not been developed pursuant to the HD zoning and the building(s) existing when the property was so zoned have fallen into disrepair and appear to be irreparable; The HD zoning of this site is not consistent with the Town's comprehensive plan t3ecause it encourages high density residential growth at a significant distance from the nearest hamlet center of Greenport and encourages suburban sprawl; The HD zoning is not consistent with the environmentally sensitive parkland which borders this property on the east, west and south, and the Iow density R-40 and R-80 zoning to the north; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED. that the Town Board of the Town of Southold finds that rezoning this property from HD to R-80 is appropriate for the- following reasons: R-80 is the base zoning of the Town because it retains the open rural environment so highly valued by year-round residents and ,those people who support the Town's economy; R-80 zoning ~s most consistent with the zoning on immediately adjacent properties; R-80 zoning will best suit the property because it will permit development to be sited so as to avoid any adverse impacts on the wetlands on this parcel; The poorly drained soils on the site present moderate to severe limitations on the construction of homesites, streets.! pipelines and landscaping for intense development. R-80 zoning will better enable these constraints to be overcome. Southold Town Clerk April 6, 1994 14-'16-2 617.21 APt~ndlx A St,t. Envlronm,nt,I Qu,llty R,vlew FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM .SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is desi;ned to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant,. The question-of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full [AF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and ils site· By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action, it provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of £AF completed for this project: F~ Part 1 -- Part 2 E3Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Part~ 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it ~s reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ~ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore, is one which will not have a s~gnificant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Z 8. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* · ~ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may havea significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. · A Conditioned Negative Declaration ~s only valid ior Unlisted Actions Change of zone for SCTM # 1000-40-4-1 Name of Action Town of $outhold Town Board Nameof Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) 1--PROJECT INFORMATI~I Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This clocum~-' is designed to assist in determining whether the actio~ proposed may ha;4 a sigr~iflcant effe~l on the environment. Ptease complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered' as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona. · information you believe will be needec~ to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent'on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation, if information requiring such addkional work is unavailable0 so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF A~T]ON Change of zone for SCTM # 1000-40-4-1 LOCATION OF ACTION (Includ~ Strut Addr~s. Municipality and C~unly) s/o CR 48, 40'- + w/o Moore's Lane, Greenport NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Town of Southold Town Board (516t 765-1891 ADORE~S 53095 Main Road cFrYmo I STATE I Z~P CODE Southold NY 11971 NAME OF OWNER (If d(fferenl) BUSINESS TELEPHONE .. · John & Ano Geier c/o Marion Geier [ ) ADDRESS Atlantic Mobil Park Box 30 crrYiPO Newport I STATE ZIP CODE NC 28570 DESCRI~IONOFACTION Change of zone to R-80 residential from HD on a 10.55 acre parcel located on the south side of County Route 48, more than 40 feet west of Moore's Lane in Greenport. Subject parcel contains three abandoned buildings and approximately 1/3 of its area is designated wetlands. The change of zone is on Town Board's own motion. Please Complete Each Question-indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: nUrban ~lndustrial [:]Forest [:]Agriculture 2. Total acreage of project area: 10. 55 acres· APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Nor.-agricultural) acres acres Forested 4.168 acres 4. 168 acres Agricultural [includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.] acres acres Wethind (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24. 25 of ECL) 3.4 15 acres 3.41~ acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces .249 acres .249 acres Other (indicate type~bandoned landscape 2 . 718 acres 2 . 718 acres C3Commercial [:]Residential (suburban) [:]Rural (non-farm} ~OtherAbandoned structures/Residential RdA-Riverhead sandy loam 0-3%slopes; 3. What is predominant soil typ~s)on project site? Sudbur¥ sanov Loam, ca-candzce sanGy ~oUam. a. Soil drainage: (Well drained 60 % of s3te [~Moderately well drained 20 % of site []Poorly drained 20 % of site b. If any agricultural [and is involved, how many acres ot soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N' Land Classification System~__~NA acres (See I NYCRR 370) 5. Approximate p~rcenta[e of propo~l~project site with slopes: ~0-10% % · . ~15% or gteat~ 6. Is project substantiany contiguous to, o: contain a building, site, or district, list~ on the State or t~ Nati~l Registers of Historic Places~ ~Yes ~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks~ ~Yes 15 . 5~ 8. What is t~ depth of the water table~ [in feet) Perched water at 0+ feet. 9. Is site located over a primal, principal, or sole source aquifer~ ~Yes ~No 10. Do hunting, fishin~ or shell fishin8 op~unities presently exist in t~ project area~ ~Yes ~No' 11. D~s project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is idenfifi~ as threaten~ or endanser~7 ~Yes ~No Accordin[ to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unu~ua~ land forms on the project site~ (i.e., cliffs, dune~, other ~eological formations) ~Yes ~No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation oread OYes []No If yes. explain 14. ' Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? eYes ~]No 15. Streams within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name NYSDEC # SO-1 bl Size (In acres)180-+ acres 17. is the site served by existing public utilities? [~Yes OHo unknown a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes ~No b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection.~ ~Yes '__:'No 18. is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article Section 303 and 304? OYes ~,No '19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 -'Yes 20 Has the s~te ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ___Yes '%No unknown Project Description Project is a proposed rezoning Physical d:lmensions and scale of proiect (fiJ! in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlle~i by project sponsor 10.55 acres, b Proiect acreage to be developed: NA acres initially; acres ultimately c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped NA acres. d. Length of project, in miles:, NA (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing NA ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour NA (upon completion of proiect)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multip, le Family Condominium Initially Ultimately NA NA ~ Dimensions (~n feet1 of lar~e',t prooo',ed structure height _ v,,dth __ length .2. How much natural material (i.e., rock. earth, etc.)will be removed from the site? 3. Wil! turb~l areas be reclaimed? OYes rqNo a. If yes, for what intend . purpose is the site be ng rec a reed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? DYes I-1No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? D-lYes F1No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. 'shrubs. ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 . acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 ye',rs old) or other Iocally-importanL vegetation be removed by this project? I-'lYes ~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7, If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? i-lYes [}No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ 0 10. Number of iobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any proiects or facilities? (number). 0 · tons/cubic yards month month r-lYes months, (including demolition). year, (including demolition)· year. r-INo ; after project is complete D-lyes 13No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ~]Yes I~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? r~Yes ~]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain [:]Yes ~3No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? DYes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? J~Yes a. If yes. what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? E]Yes I-~No c. If yes. give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes. explain []No OYes ;C3;N o 17. Wilt the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes. what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes fqYes ~No tons/month. years. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? F1Yes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [}Yes E~No If yes . indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N,~ gallons/day ~No OYes gallons/minute. lgNo 25., Appre~ats Itequire~: Type Submittal Date City. Town. Village Board FRYes i"lNo City. Town. Village Planning Board aYes fqNo City, Town Zoning Board I-Wes I-1No City, County Health Department ayes Other Local Agencies ayes Oiher Regional Agencies I-lYes C]No State Agencies [~Yes [~No Federal Agencies [Yes E~No Change of Zone C, Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~]Yes [3No If Yes, indicate decision required: ~3zoning amendment [zoning variance I-qspecial use permit E~subdivision E]site plan E3new/revision of master plan ~]resource management plan Oother 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? HD 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 15 units with out public sewer/31 units with public-sewer R-80 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 3 units 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? []Yes 7 What are the predominant land use{s) and zoning classifications within a '/, mile radius of proposed action? Village ~arkland/PD, Undeveloped lan~/P-4n~ ~-80 , Unfinished Subdivision/R-4( 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V~ 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water district-s? 11 12 mile? I~Yes ImNo NA [Yes []No Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police. fire protection)? []Yes ~No a. If yes. is existing capaoty sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes ~]No will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [Yes ~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? I-lYes []No D. Informational Details Attach any additional intormation as may be needed to clarify your project_ If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the informati'on provided above is true to the best of my know[edge. Applicant/Sponsor N~e.~ ,\^tk~ ~.,~'~ ~' ~t'l~/~- ,~LA' Date ~' Part 2--1 JECT'IMPACTS AND THEIR kGNITUDE . I~e~po~bitih, of Le~l General Informatlo~ '°-ad Carefully) · In completing the torm the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and ~l-.terminat,ions be~n rea~mable! The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) 6oes not mean that it is lbO necessarily ~lgnlflc~M. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying ·n impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at fur[her. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts an<l wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would t~i~er a response in column 2. The examples are ~enerally applicable throughout th~ State and for most situations. But, for any specific proiect or site other e~amples and~'o~ lower thresholds may be appropriate fo~ a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluatioa in Part 3. · The impact~ of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Themfoce. the examples are illustrath/e.and have be~n offered as guidance. They do ~ot constitute ·n exhaust~e list o{ impact~ and thresholds to answ~ each question. · The number of examples per questio~ do~s not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. In~tructlon~ (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be ar~, impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered ·s Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 o~ 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If imp·ct threshold equals or exceeds any example prov~ed, check column 2. If imp·ct will occur but thresholc is lower than example, check column 1. _ d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the imp·ct then consider' the impact as potent/ally large and proce~ to PART 3 e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be initiated by change(s) in the project to a small b3 moderat~ impact, also check the Yes ]>ox in column 3. A No response indicate~ that ~uch · ~duction is not pos$~le. Thi · must be e~plained in Part 3. 1 2 3 SmaJI to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mit!gated By -' F~paL-t'* impact PTOject Ch~ng~ O [-] OYes I--)No [] [] OYes i--)No [] 0 OYes [] [] OYes I']Nc [] [] OYes [] [] OYes 0 [] OYes 0~ ~ti~ [] OYes i-IN( IMPACT ON LAND ..... - 1. wm ~ propo~d ·~o~ re, u~ in a p~:,I ~han~ ~ ~ ~o~ ~NO OYES Examp~ ~at w~ld apply to ~[umn 2 * ~y c~stmction ~ slo~s of 15% or ~reater, (15 f~t rise ~ 1~ f~t of lensth), or where t~ ~eneral slo~s in the project ·re· ~c~ 10%. - Const~ction on land where the depth to the water table is [~s than 3 . Construction of pav~ park[n~ area for 1,~ or more vehicle. ~ Construction on la~ w~re ~r~k is ex~ or 8enerally ~hin 3 f~t of existin~ 8r~nd sudace. ~. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or invol~ more than one phase or e Excavation for minin~ pur~ses that would remove more than 1,~ tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) ~r year. - Construction or expansion of a san[ta~ landfill. ~ Construction in a desi~nat~ flyway. - Other impac~) Change of zone will reduce the with of a significant physical chanqe of th~ ]and reduction of density. 2. Will ~ere ~ an ~tf~cl t,. -.,~ un,qo~ or unusual land form~ f~nd on t~ sit~ (i.~.. cliffs, dun~, ~o~ical fo~ati~, ~tc.)~NO OYES - 5~cific land fo~s: ~SJII tO IMPACT ON ~'ATER 3 Will pro', ~.d action affect any watt~ body designated as protected~ (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of t~e Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ~NO ~YES Ezampl~ that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site cont~ins'a protected water ~y. ·Dr~ging more than protected stream. · Construction in a ~signat~ freshwa~r or t~al wetla~. Change of zone removes density away · Other impact: from freshwater wetlands. Wetlands are a substantJ al portion of this site. 4. Will pro.ned action affect any nomprotected existing or new of wated ~NO ~Y~S E~ampl~ that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in t~ sudace area of any ~Y of water or more than a 10 acre increa~ or ~rease. · Construction of a ~Y of water that exce~s 10 acres of sudace area. · Ot~r impact: S. Will Pro~S~ Action aff~t sudace or groundwater qu~li~ or quanti~? ~NO ~YES E~ that ~uld apply ~ colu~ 2 . p~ Acti~ r~uires u~ of a ~rce of water that have approval to se~e p~~t) action· · Pro~ Acti~ ~uir~ wa~r supp~ from wells with greater than 45 gall~s ~r mince ~m~ng ~a~c~. · C~ct~ ~ ~rat~ ca~ing ~ contaminati~ of a water su~ly system. · Proud Action will adversely affe~ groundwater. · Liquid effluent will ~ convey~ off ~ site to facilities which pre~ntly do ~t exist or have inad~uate ca~ci~. · P~s~ Action would use water day. · Pro.ned Action will iikel" c~use sil~tion or other discharge into an existin~ ~Y of wale, lu the e.:icnt t~t there will ~ an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Propos~ Action will r~uire t~ storage of ~troleum or chemical pr~ucts lreater than 1.1~ ~altons. · Pro.ned Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer se~ices. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may r~uire new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities · Other impac~:~he reduction of density will redu9 ootential impacts to the wetlands from future run-off w a ong wi the e ' ' Poor sollsand high .qro~. · .~ water [~zmpl~ that would eDPlY to column Moderate Impact [] 0 0 [] 0- [] 0 0 [] [] O densit signif 2 Potential Large Impact O O 0 [] [] [] 0 O [] 0 [] [] [] 0 [] [] could cant imp $ Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project C~ange OYes ON• OYes I-IN• OYes ON• OYes ON• OYes I-IN• OYes J'-iNo OYes ~NO OYes ON• OYes ON• OYes I-IN• F'lyes ON• OYe~ ' 'i--iN• OYes i-IN• OYes ON• OYes J--]No OYes ENo OYes ON• OYes •Nc OYes J-]Nc ve cts. · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. 0. Other impacts: Entire area is lowlying and poorly drained. Intensive development will cause impact A change of zone would eliminate this potential. IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will propos~ed action affect air quality~ [~NO OYES E~amp[es that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle uips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 miliion BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Ot~r impactS: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered sl:~ciesi' ,I~NO nYES Eumplm that Would apply to column J ' · Reductio'n of one or more species listed on the New York c~ Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on th~ site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitaL · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9. Will Prdposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? 5~NO I'~YE S Example~ that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than '10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRIOULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ~NO OYES E~,mple~ that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, p~sture, vineyard, ~c~ard. etc.) Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Imp&ct Impact Project Change [] n OYes •No [] 0 [-]Yes DH· [] O OYes •No [] [] OYes •No [] O · OYes ON· [] [] OYes ONo [] [] OYes E3No [] O I-lyes ON· [] O OYes i--iN· [] [] DY& [] 0 OYes ONo [] [] OYes ON· [] [] OYes []No [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] OYes []No [] [] Ov~ •No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the ~oil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more · than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · T~e proposed action would disrupt cx prevent insballafio~ of agric~l~ral land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping3; c~r create a ne~ for such measure~ (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impact3: I1 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By rmpact Impact Project Change O 1'-1 OYes ONo O 0 OYes I-]No O O OYes I-]No O O OYes [~]No 0 O OYes ONo 0 O iOY [-1 O OYes E)No 0 O DYes I-)No O O OYes ONo [] [] OYes [] O OYes O [] OYes 0 O O [] []]Yes OHo IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~NO OYES (if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Example~ that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from o~ in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whet~r' man-made or natural. ., · Proposal [and uses, or project cornpor~nts vhible to us~-s of aesthetic resource~ which will eliminate or significantly reduce t~ir · enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant "~creening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities;' Examples that would apply to column 2 E]NO ~)YES )The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. '"~ A maior reductionsoiftaen ~n space important to the community. zs surrounded by park · Other impact3: _ distri_ct zqni_ng.. IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importancei' [~NO [-]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Re~ister of histqric places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil ~ located within th~ project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitNe for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Site contains historic structure , · Other impacts: other cultural resourses expected. Hiqh density could impact these resources. IMPACT ON TRANSF~). RTATION 14 Will there b~ an effect to existing transportation s,...ms~ ~NO I-lYES Jaample~ that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in maior traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY ' 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply~ ~"INO f-lYE S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in [he use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to ser~e more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial u~e. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectkmable odor~, noise, or vibraticm as a result of tbe Pr~posed AcUon? ~NO · r'IYES E~amples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Propos~] Action will produce ope/,~ting noise exceeding t~'l'oc~'l- ambient noise levels for noise o~JLside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Otber impact~: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? I~INO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil. pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbaqce within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impact~: Small to Moderate Impact O O. O [] O [] O [] O O 2 Potential Large Impact O O [] O O O 0 O O [] $ Can Impact B, Mitigated By Project Chang OYes nNc OYes ONe i-lYes ONe []Yes ON~ OYes ON~ OYes OYes F'iN I-iN O~ OYes Oh []Yes OYes •l []Yes O OYes [] IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community~ ~NO ByES Example~ that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · · The municipal budget for capital expenditures o~ operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project· · Proposed actJo~ will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause · change in the c~nsity of land use. · Proposed Action will replace, or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future project~. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other'~ impacts: Present development is an unoccupied residential building. Existing zoning is for multi- family. I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact B~ Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [-] E] Byes ONe tr-I O OYes ONe O O OYes DNo ,~] O OYes [*-]No ~ O OYes Ohio [] [] OYes ONe [] [] [-]Yes ONe i [] O OYes ONoI O O OYes ONe Change of zon~ would, r~Dke 19. IS ~ere, or lstnere li~etoC~,P~u~i~l~n~ys~u~ding land use. potential adverse environmental impacts? (~NO OYES I1 Any Action In Part 2 I$ Identified aa a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS %e:~-pom~bility of Lead A%ency Part 3 must be prepared if or~ or more impact(s) is corrs~defed to be potentially Jar%e, even if the impact(s) may b< mitigated. Instructions Discuss ,the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s 3. Based on the information available, decide it it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of' importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility0 including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the p~oject relate to this imp~act (Continue on attachments) CRAMER, vOORHIS &'~SOCIATES ENV RONMENTAL:AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Ms. Valerie Scopaz Planner Town of Southold Main Road Southold, New York 11971 March 8, 1994 RE: Proposal for Services Preparation of Long Environmental Assessment Forms (EAF) for Proposed Hamlet Density Zoning in the Town of Southold Dear Valerie: Pursuant to your request, the following will serve as a proposal for services with regard to the above referenced. It is our understanding that the Town Board wishes to consider the possible rezoning for six undeveloped parcels from Hamlet Density (HD) to L' nce-80 R-80 This proposed action is a result of the study prep,a, red by you and the Reside ( )' - .... a ~t~f¢ ~nt~tl~rl "R~iew of Hamlet Densttv Zomng tn the Town of Southold , dated Febru ry 1994. The following are the s~x parcels that roll be considered m the public hearings. SCTM# 100-40-3-1 100-40-4-1 100-35-1-25 100-45-2-10.3 100-45-2-1 100-35-1-24 Hamlet Location Greenport, umncorp. Greenport, umncorp. Greenport, umncorp. Greenport, umncorp. Greenport, unmcorp. Greenport, umncorp. Acreage 17.1 10.55 132.08 20.07 1.2 62.3 CVA proposes to complete the Long EAF nece, ssa~ for cold_intel, on, wit,h,,othe, r,.. involved agencies under the State Environmental Quality Keview I ag~i) Act. we wm also carry out field inspections on each of the subject parcels to assist in the preparation on the documents. It is also our understanding that you have certain information that will be made available to us to assist in the preparation of the Long EAF's. In consideration of the above we estimate that the preparation of each Long EAF will cost between $150.00 to $200.00, with a total sum of not to exceed $1,200.00. I hope you and the Board find the above proposal acceptable. If there are any qnestions with the above please feel free to contact me. If the Board authorizes this proposal, please let me know and we will begin work immediately as I understand that the public hearing will be set for March 22. Thank you for your consideration of CVA and I hope to hear from you shortly. Very truly, yofirs, ~ Thom[is W. Cramer, ASLA 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 2, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS, MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Souihold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516/ 765 1801 March 10, 1994 Thomas W. Cramer, ASLA Cramer, Voorhis & Associates 54 North Country Road, Suite 2 Miller Place, New York 11764 Dear Tom: This is to confirm that the Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on March 8, 1994, adopted a resolution accepting your proposal to prepare Long Environmental Assessment Forms for six proposed rezonings to be undertaken on the Town Board's own motion. A certified copy of the resolution is enclosed. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosure cc: V. Scopaz, Senior Plannerp~ SOUIHOLD Pt~FINING BOARD ~~ITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765 1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 8, 199ti: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby accepts the proposal of Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, dated March 8, 1994, at a total sum not to exceed $1,200.00, for the preparation of Long Environmental Assessment Forms for six (6) proposed rezonings to be undertaken on the Town Board's own motion. Southold Town Clerk March 9, 1994 NOTES: I. TOTAL AREA =10.5561 ACRES 2. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DIST I000 SECT. 040 BLK. 04 LOT OI ~ ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED TOPOGRAPHICAL,SURVEY PREPARED FOR DANIEL MARCUCCI AT GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK DATE~ SEPT. I, SCALE I'*: 80' NO. 87 - 1038 COUNTY, N.Y 1987 400 OSTRANDER AVE, RIVERHEAD~ ALDEN W. YOUNG~ N.Y.S. RE.& L.S. LIC. NO. 12945 HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y. 8. L.S. LIC. NO. 45895 rr t ~AY 2 4 19~ SOUTHOLDTOWN 7'/22.,~ - Z 1%4A~ (Retired) March 1, 1988 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Proposal of Daniel Marcucci Property of Geier S/s County Road #48, Greenport, SCTM# 1000-040-04-01 N,Yo Dear Mr. Orlowski: In our letter to you of December 2, 1987 (copy enclosed for your reference) we requested an informal meeting to discuss this project with the board members. We have not received a reply to that letter and are still looking to meet with you and the board. We have, in the intervening months, obtained additional information regarding the availability of water and sewer service, as well as a revised plan. Kindly advise as of a date and time when the board members will accommodate our request for a meeting. Sincerely, Rudolph H. Bruer RHB/df Enc. cc: Mr. Daniel Marcucci ~~ecember 2, 1987 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Proposal of Daniel Marcucci Property of Geier S/s County Road #48, Greenport, N.Y. SCTM# 1000-040-04-01 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Our client, Daniel Marcucci, has discussed the above-referenced proposal with Valerie Scopaz, as has the architectural firm of Fairweather-Brown. We understand Ms. Scopaz has, in turn, informed the board members of these discussions, and that the board members are requesting confirmation of water and sewer availability from the Village of Greenport before further consideration of this proposal. We enclose herewith a copy of 11/27/87 letter of James I. Monsell, addressed to Mr. Marcucci. The water district is looking for some direction with regard to allowable density. May we please meet informally with the board members to address this matter. Copies of the current plan and architect's rendering are enclosed for your reference. Kindly advise as to when the board members can accommodate our request. .~erely, R~dolpb'H. Bruer RHB/df Eric. cc: Mr. Daniel Marcucci MAYOR 236 T}IIRD STR}' ET PO BOX AH (;~EI:NPORT, SUFFOLK COUNTY NkW ~O~K 11944 November 27, 1987 UIIt. FI'YOi!ICI I11 (516) 477-174~ ~)WERPL^NF IlL. ($16) 477-0172 Mr. Daniel Marcucci 4400 Ventnor Avenue Atlantic City, New Jersey Dear Mr. Marcucci: 08401 Re: Proposed Ten Acre Development North Road, Greenport, N.Y. Your proposed development on ten acres of land formerly known as the Geier property in Greenport is near the Greenport Water Supply facilities and the Greenport Sewage Treatment facilities. You should get a decision from the Southold Town Planning Board on the following: (1) Density allowed witl~ Public Water and Public Sewer. (2) Density allowed with Public Water; no Public Sewer. When we have received this information, the Utility Committee can proceed with your application. If I can be of further service, please call. Very truly yours, /,~c,,~ ~ JanHmesn, I. Monsel l Superintendent of Public Utilities dlM:nr cc: George Hubbard, Mayor All Village Trustees Utility Committee MEMORANDUM TO: FILE FROM: Valerie Scopaz, To~n Planner MEMORANDUM Continued