HomeMy WebLinkAboutLocal Erosion Management Plan
.
.
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
'.(~"'."~'~Uf-fU'cr_.......
;'.-SS . "C;.
\\ig '.''S
Cl '
<I> ""
'>-,
'. ~ '.'-
........ .<:-
~,,,%: . '. "
<.........0, .it '.'
:~.. ......;r ;-
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
March 8, 1995
Philip C. Sears, Vice President
Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc.
117 East 29th Street
New York, New York 10016
Dear Mr. Sears:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
Inasmuch as we are ili receipt of the executed agreements for the
Town of Southold Harbor Management Plan and Erosion Management Plan,
I am returning herewith your two (2) certified bid checks in the amounts
of $2,500.00 and $4,500.00.
Very truly yours,
~~
Judith T. Terry .
Southold Town Clerk
Enclosures
.
.
"
I
ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING INC.
0012990
DATE INVOICE NO. DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT DEDUCTION AMOUNT
11-29-94 112994.10 SECURITY DEPOSIT 4,500.00 .00 4,500.00
,
,
I
I
CHECK > I CHECK l> I TOTALS )
DATE 12-01-94 NUMBER 12990 4,500.00 .00 4,500.00
PLEASE DETACH THIS PORTION AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS.
.
.
"
/
ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING INC.
0012988
DATE INVOICE NO. DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT DEDUCTION AMOUNT
11-29-94 112994 SECUR !TY DEPOSIT 2,500.00 .00 . 2, 500 . 00
I
I
., .
CHECK ). . If HECK ,> I TOTALS )
DATE 12-01-94 NUMBER 12988 2,500.00 .00 2,500.00
PLEASE DETACH THIS PORTION AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS.
.
.
Allee
King
Rosen &
Fleming, Inc.
Environmental and Plarming Consultants
117 East 29th Street. New York, NY 10016 . 212/6%-0670
FAX Number 212/213-3191
March 7, 1995
Ms. Ruth D. Oliva
Deputy Supervisor
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
RE: Contracts for the Harbor and Erosion Management Plans
Dear Ruth:
Please find enclosed signed and notarized copies of the contracts for
preparation of the Harbor Management Plan and the Erosion Management Plan for
the Town of Southold. It is our understanding that the Town can now return
our bid deposit.
We had a very productive meeting with Department of State last week, and
their input was quite helpful. We are planning on submit the draft plans to
you by mid- to late- March. I am in the processes of analyzing the data we
have gathered, and plan on being in Southold mid-week, March 13th to complete
the data gathering. I will call you a couple of days before I come. We have
been told that a meeting with DEC in late March has been arranged to discuss
placement of dredged materials. If appropriate, I will attend that meeting.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact
us.
Sincerely,
ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, INC.
liL.~(",~ C ~-/-UK.,-L
Philip C. Sears
Vice President
cc: Steve Ridler, NYS DOS wlo enclosures
Bob White
PCS:wp
shold-2.let
.
.
THIS AGREEMENT made this 2nd day of March ,1995, between the TOWN OF
SOUTHOLD, a municipality of the State of New York, having its principal office at 53095
Main Road, Southold, New York (the "Town") and ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, INC.,
having its principal office at 117 East 29th Street, New York, New York (the "Contractor")
agree as follows:
1. Performance of the Work. The Contractor shall perform the services for
preparation of a draft and final Erosion Manaaement Plan in accordance with the
description of those services set forth in the Request for Proposal prepared by the Town of
Southold and the Proposal submitted by Contractor and dated December 6, 1994.
2. Compensation. The above described services shall be provided for a fee not to
exceed $25,000.00.
3. Commencement and Completion Dates. Contractor shall commence the work
immediately and shall diligently and continuously prosecute the work at such date as will allow
it to be completed no later than March 31, 1995, unless the Town allows an extension.
4. Workers Compensation. Contractor agrees that it has or will secure, for the term
of this contract, Workers Compensation coverage as required by law.
5. Non-Collusive Bid. Contractor certifies that its bid has been arrived at by the
Contractor independently and has been submitted without collusion with any other vendor of
materials, supplies or equipment of the type described in the invitation for bids, and the
contents of this bid have not been communicated by the Contractor nor, to its best knowledge
and belief, by any of its employees or agents, to any person not an employee or agent of
.
.
the Contractor or its surety on any bond furnished herewith prior to the official opening of the
bid.
6. Contractor's Representations. Contractor makes the following warranties and
representations:
A. Contractor warrants that Contractor shall comply with all federal, state and
local laws, ordinances or regulations applicable to all of the services to be performed by
Contractor.
B. Contractor represents that the information furnished by Contractor with the bid
is accurate and complete and Contractor acknowledges that Town has relied upon the
accuracy and completeness of that information in the selection of Contractor as the lowest
responsible bidder.
C. The Contractor represents that Contractor shall utilize its best efforts to insure
that Minority and Women Owned Businesses (MBE's and WBE's) have the opportunity to
participate as subcontractors under this Agreement. In the event the contractor subcontracts
twenty-five percent (25%) or more of its work hereunder, Contractor shall submit to the town
an MBE and a WBE Utilization Plan, prior to execution of this Agreement.
7. Quality. Contractor agrees to provide, perform and complete all of the foregoing
in a proper and workmanlike manner, consistent with the highest standards of professional
and construction practices and in full compliance with, and as required by or pursuant to, this
contract, and with the greatest economy, efficiency, and expedition consistent therewith, with
only new, undamaged and first quality equipment, materials and supplies.
8. Technical Ability To Perform. Contractor represents and warrants that it is
sufficiently experienced and competent, and has the necessary capital, facilities, plant,
.
.
organization, and staff, to provide, perform complete the work in full compliance with, and as
required by or pursuant to, this contract.
9. Warranty of Work. Contractor warrants that the work and all of its components
shall be free of defects and flaws in design, workmanship and materials and shall be fit,
sufficient and suitable for the purpose expressed in the specifications.
10. Contract Price and Payment Schedule. The contract price shall be paid in lump
sum payable in two payments: 1) 60% of the fee upon submission of a draft plan; and 2) 40%
upon submission of a final plan in a form satisfactory to the Town Board. The Board shall
review it within two weeks of submission. Contractor shall provide the Town with
documentation of nature and hours of work performed.
11. Prevailing Wage Rates. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of the
New York State Labor Law relating to the payment of prevailing wage rates to the extent
applicable, or the applicable State Law in the state of disposal. In the event that at any time
during performance under the contract the Contractor is required to increase the wages paid
to any of its employees as a result of such requirement, all costs resulting there from shall be
borne exclusively by Contractor.
12. Insurance and Indemnification. Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and
hold harmless the Town of Southold against any and all liability, demand, cost or charge
which the Town may directly or indirectly suffer as a result of Contractor performing the terms
of this agreement.
13. Subcontracts. Contractor shall not enter into any subcontracts in connection with
the services to be performed by Contractor hereunder, except for those subcontractors named
in the Proposal, without the prior written approval by the Town of such subcontracts, All such
3
.
.
subcontracts shall make express reference to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and
shall obligate the subcontractor to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws,
ordinances or regulations relating to the services to be performed under the subcontract.
In the event the subcontractor is required to furnish any insurance or bonds for the
benefit of Contractor, the Town shall also be named as an additional insured or obligee.
14. Prevailing Wage Rate. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of the
New York State Labor Law relating to the payment of prevailing wage rates to the extent
applicable, or the applicable State Law in the state of disposal. In the event that at any time
during performance under this Agreement the Contractor is required to increase the wages
paid to any of its employees as a result of such requirement, all costs resulting therefrom shall
be borne exclusively by Contractor.
15. Independent Contractor. Contractor agrees that it will conduct itself consistent
with its status, said status being that of an independent contractor and, Contractor, its
employees or agents will neither hold themselves out nor claim to be an officer or employee of
the Town of Southold nor make claim to any right accruing thereto including, but not limited to,
Worker's Compensation, Unemployment Benefits, Social Security or Retirement Membership
or credit.
16. Dispute Resolution Procedure. If Contractor disputes or objects to any
requirement, direction, instruction, interpretation, determination, or decision of Town,
Contractor may notify Town in writing of its dispute or objection and of the amount of any
equitable adjustment to the contract price or contract time to which Contractor claims it will be
entitled as a result thereof; provided, however, that Contractor shall, nevertheless, proceed
without delay to perform the work as required, directed, instructed, interpreted, determined, or
4
.
.
decided by Town, without regard to such dispute or objection. Unless Contractor so notifies
Town within two (2) business days after receipt of such requirement, direction, instruction,
interpretation, determination, or decision, Contractor shall be conclusively deemed to have
waived all such disputes or objections and all claims based thereon.
17. Contractor's Remedies. If Town fails or refuses to satisfy a final demand made
by Contractor pursuant to this contract, or to otherwise resolve the dispute which is the subject
of such demand to the satisfaction of Contractor, within ten days following receipt of such
demand, then Contractor shall be entitled to pursue such remedies, not inconsistent with the
provisions of this contract, as it may have in law or equity.
18. Town's Remedies. If it should appear at any time prior to final payment that
Contractor has failed or refused to prosecute, or has delayed in the prosecution of, the work
with diligence at a rate that assures completion of the work in full compliance witl;J the
requirements of this contract on or before the completion date, or has attempted to assign this
contract or Contractor's rights under this contract, either in whole or in part, or has falsely
made any representation or warranty in this contract, or has otherwise failed, refused, or
delayed to perform or satisfy any other requirement of this contract or has failed to pay its
debts as they come due and has failed to cure any such default within five business days after
Contractor's receipt of written notice of such default, then Town shall have the right, at its
election and without prejudice to any other remedies provided by law or equity, to complete
all defective work, have such correction performed at Contractor's expense, terminate the
contract without liability for further payments, or pursue such remedies as it may have in law
or equity.
5
.
.
19. Binding Effect. This contract shall be binding upon Town and Contractor and
upon their respective heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, and permitted
successors and assigns. Every reference in this contract to a party shall also be deemed to be
a reference to the authorized officers, employees, agents, and representatives of such party.
20. Assignment. Contractor shall not (1) assign this contract in whole or in part, (2)
assign any of Contractor's rights or obligations under this contract, or (3) assign any payment
due or to become due under this contract without the prior express written approval of Town,
which approval may be withheld in the sole and unfettered discretion of Town. Town may
assign this contract in whole or in part, or any or all of its rights or obligations under this
contract, without the consent of Contractor.
21. Notices. All notices required or permitted to be given under this contract shall be
in writing and shall be deemed received by the addressee thereof when delivered in person
on a business day at the address set forth below or on the third business day after being
deposited in any main or branch United States post office, for delivery at the address set forth
below by properly addressed, postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, return receipt
requested.
Notices and communications to Town shall be addressed to, and delivered at, the
following address:
TOWN OF SOUTH OLD
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Attention:
Thomas Wickham, Supervisor
Notices and communications to Contractor shall be addressed to, and
-
delivered at, the following address:
6
.
.
ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, INC.
117 East 29th Street
New York, New York 10016
Attention:
Philip C. Sears
22. Governing Laws. This contract and the rights of Town and Contractor under this
contract shall be interpreted according to the internal laws of the State of New York.
23. Non-Discrimination Clause. In accordance with Article 15 of the Executive Law
and all other State and federal statutory and constitutional non-discrimination provisions, the
Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of
race, creed, color, sex, national origin, age, disability or marital status.
24. Non-Collusive Bidding Requirement. If this contract was awarded based upon
the submission of bids, Contractor warrants, under penalty of perjury, that its bid was arrived
at independently and without collusion aimed at restricting competition.
25. Default. In the event Contractor fails to perform its obligations under this
Agreement or in the event the Town is notified that its state grant funds for this project have
been rescinded, the Town may terminate such Agreement. Contractor shall be paid for all
expenses incurred prior to notice of termination of the contract, but Town shall not be liable for
any expenses incurred thereafter.
26. Severability. The provisions of this contract shall be interpreted when possible to
sustain their legality and enforceability as a whole. In the event any provision of this contract
shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, in whole or
in part, neither the validity of the remaining part of such provision, nor the validity of any other
provisions of this contract shall, in any way, be affected thereby.
27. Entire Agreement. This contract sets forth the entire agreement of Town and
Contractor with respect to the accomplishment of the work and the payment of the contract
price therefore, and there are no other understandings or agreements, oral or written, between
Town and Contractor with respect to the work and the compensation therefore.
7
.
.
Nothing in this contract shall be construed to waive or limit any aspect of Town's
lawful authority to regulate the activities of Contractor, its subcontractors' or any other person
or to regulate the work, the work site or any other matter falling within its lawful regulatory
jurisdiction and powers. No review, inspection, test, audit, measurement, order, determination,
decision, disapproval, approval, payment for or use or acceptance of the work, or any other
act or omission of Town shall imply, create any interest in, be deemed to be the issuance of or
require Town to issue any license or permit to Contractor or any subcontractor.
28. Amendments. No modification, addition, deletion, revision, alteration or other
change to this contract shall be effective unless and until such change is reduced to writing
and executed and delivered by Town and Contractor.
29. Miscellaneous.
A. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York.
B. Contractor shall not assign, conveyor otherwise transfer its rights or
obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Town.
C. This Agreement, including the Bid Specifications, Bid Form, and all Exhibits
attached thereto represent the entire agreement between the Town and Contractor relating to
the Services to be performed hereunder. This Agreement may be modified only by written
agreement of Contractor and Town.
D. To the extent of any inconsistency among the documents constituting the
agreement of the parties, the priority among those documents shall be:
1. This Agreement
2. The Request for Proposal
3. The Contractor's Proposal
E. If any provision of the Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid or
unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any of the
remaining provisions of the Agreement and this Agreement shall be enforced as if such invalid
and unenforceable provision had not been contained herein.
8
.
.
F. Contractor agrees that it shall not discriminate and that it shall cause there to
be no discrimination against any employee who is employed in the work, or against any
applicant for such employment, because of race, religion, color, sex, age, marital status,
handicap or national origin in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or of the
State of New York.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto set t ir hands and seals the
day and year first above written.
TOWN OF SOUTH
By:
Thomas H. Wickham, Supervisor
ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, INC.
By:
r ( I'" f
/'J ,'v.-.uA"J..., , _ .A--i'~
Philip C. 'Sears, Vice President
STATE OF NEW YORK)
ss:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
On this 2nddayof March
, 1995, before me personally came
THOMAS H. WICKHAM, to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that
he resides at Private Road, Cutchogue, New York, and that he is the Supervisor of the Town
of Southold, the Municipal Corporation described in and which executed the foregoing
instrument; that he knows the seal of said Town; that the seal affixed to said instrument is
such Town seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Town Board of the Town of Southold,
and that he signed his name thereto by like order.
~~
otary puqnS"l .",,;.,
, .! '.'''', ',I 'l,-,I ~~
15
9
.
.
STATE OF NEW YORK)
ss:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
On this 14'L day of nfMch
, 1995, before me personally came PHILIP C.
SEARS, to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he is the Vice
President of Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. the corporation described in and which
executed the above instrument; and that he signed his name thereto like order.
~
Notary Public
- SHARON SllVERMAIIf
Notary Public, Slate of f,.w York
No. $1-4972435
Qualified in Nevi York County
Term Expires Oct. 1, 199v
10
l
,"Z7-1995 14:00
. DOS CMP
. 473 2464
P.02
it
STATE OF NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
AL8ANY. NY 12231-0001
ALiXANDEa ~. TR'IADWaLL
Slc..n.AY o. S1'ATI
Honorable Thomas H. Wickham
Supervisor
Town of Southold
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
February 27, 1995
Dear SupcIVUor Wi,,1rham;
The proposed subcontlaCtS between the Town of Southold and Allee, King, Rosen and Fleming.
Inc. for completion of the Town's HaIbor ~anagement Plan and Local Erosion MaJlaien1ent
Plan have beenxeviewed and found to be in agteenlOI1t with the tasks of the grant agreoments
between the NYS Department of State and the Town (Comptroller's Contracts No. COO5627 and
COOS628), and are approved punuant to Article I of the agreements. A copy of the executed
subcontracts should be returned to me at your earliest convenience.
If you have any questions, please COnt.cl Kevin Millington at 474-6000.
y,
rt R. Stafford
Director
Division of Coastal Resources
and Waterfront RcviraH7ation
., .,
",. .
, GRS:sdr
.' . .
.
.
FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC.
Pia nn ing / Development / Environ ment / T ra ns po rtalron
Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut
David J Portman, AICP
Howard I. Reynolds, PE
David H. Slolman, AICP
350 Theodore Fremd Avenue
Rye, New York 10580
(914) 967_G~'"
Michael A. Galante
Joanne P. Meder, AICP
Jim Donovan, RLA ASLA
December 19, 1994
Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Town of Southhold
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P. O. Box 1179
Southhold, New York 11971
RECEiveD
DEe 2 2 1994
rDlYJ1 Clerk &outhoId
Subject: Harbor Manaaement Plan and Local Erosion Manaaement Plan
Dear Ms. Terry:
Thank you for sending us Requests For Proposals regarding the
preparation of the above captioned plans for the Town.
Unfortunately, due to our current workload, we will not be
submitting proposals to you for these projects.
We wish you the very best of luck with these projects and we look
forward to the prospect of being of service to the Town in the
future.
Very truly yours,
(~8
David H. Stolman, AICP
Executive Vice President
DHS:crc
Connecticut. (203) 255-3; 00
FAX. (914) 967-6615
Long Island. (516) 364-4544
.
.
.
..
RECElvec
DEe 1 6 1994
rown Clerk Southold
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
/'Iff---
Decemberl\ 1994
AGENDA
1. Overview of Background and Status of LWRP
2.
Down the
A.
B.
Road: The Next Six Months
Coastal Erosion Study and Plan
Harbor Management Study and Plan
! I
,
3. Who? What? When?:
A. The Shape and Role of the Advisory Committees
B. Coordination with the Consultants
C. Deadlines
OCT-27-1994 16:09 FROM
.
TO
8-9007111P167651823
P.17
ATrACHMENT 3: REQl.lIREMENTS FOR CONTRACT MAP PRODUCTS
GENERAL MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
The following general canographic requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor:
1) Map Products - The Division's preference is for the delivery of digital map products that meet the
specifications outlined in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section. If analog map products are
produced, they must meet specifications outlined in the Digital-Ready Map Product Requirements section.
The ability to provide digital map products will be one of the factors used in selecting a Contractor.
2) Deliverable Format - All digital map and attribute table files must be provided in Maplnfo 3.0 for
Windows fO{lllat on 4 mm DA T tape or 3.5. floppy diskette media. Alternatively, the digital products
may be provided in UNIX or PC ARCllNFO binary format or AutoCAJj DXF format on the same media
types upon approval of the Division. All other digital formats require prior approval of the Division.
All non-digital map products must be provided on stable base material at a scale agreed upon by the
Division_ The map products must include an index map to all map sheets and thorough descriptions of
all the cartographic elements portrayed on the maps.
3) Documentation -- A data dictionary must be included along with the map files describing file contents.
file names, map projection, coordinate system, RMS accuracy, information sources, and creation
methodology.
4) Map Accuracy - Unless otherwise stated by the Division, all deliverable map products must conform
to National Map Accuracy Standards for horizontal accuracy as established by the United States
GeologiCal Survey (USGS). For example, maps at 1:20,000 or smaller, not more than 10% of the well-
defined map points tested must be more than 1150 inch (5 mm) out of correct position. At 1 :24,000, this
tolerance translates to a required horizontal accuracy of.40 feet.
DIGITAL CARTOGRAPHIC FILE REQtJlREMENTS
The following cartographic construction requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor:
1) Edge-matcbiog - All map sheets must be both visually and coordinate edge-matched with adjacent
map sheets. No edge-matcl1 tolerance will be allowed. Attributes for splitable features must also be
identical.
2) Common Boundaries - All features that share a common boundary, regardless of map layer, must
have exactly the same coordinate position of that feature in all common layers.
3) Point DupUcation - No duplication of points that occur within a data string is permitted.
4) CoDJJeCtivity - Where graphic elements visually meet, they must be also digitally meet. All
confluences of line and polygon data must be exact; "overshoots", .undershoots". .slivers", or
.offshoots" are NOT p=itted.
16
GCT-27-1994 16:10 FROM
.
TO
S-9007111f167651S23
P.1S
5) Line Quality - A high quality cartographic appearance must be achieved. Transitions from straight
lines to curvilinear elements must be smooth, with angular inflections at the point of intersection. The
digital representation must not contain eJltraneous data at a non visible level. There should be no jags,
hooks, or zero length segments. Any lines that are straight, or should be straight, should be digitized
using only two points that represent the beginning and ending points of the line.
6) Polygon Closure - For area features being digitized, the last coordinate pair must be exactly
(mathematically) equal to the first coordinate pair. No line or polygon must cross itself except to join
at an actual confluence. All digitized features across map boundaries must be edited to effect smooth and
continuous lines.
7) Graphic Precision - All digital graphic elements must contain positional coordinates significant to
one thousandth (.001) of a foot.
8) Digitizer Accuracy - The required RMS error for digitizer accuracy must be .003 or better for digital
map registration.
DIGITAL-READY MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
The following requirements for non-digital map products must be followed to facilitate the future
conversion of the maps to digital map products.
1) Base Map Media - All maps must be created on mylar or other stable base material.
2) Map Scale - All maps of a similar series should be created using the same base scale. U niess
otherwise stated by the Division, all maps should be compiled at 1:24,000. If other map scales are
approved by the Division, they will conform to standard map scales such as 1:9600; 1:50,000; 1:75,000;
or 1:100,000.
3) Map Registration -The maps must provide a minimum of four (4) comer and four (4) interior ticks
tied to USGS/NYSDOT quadrangle LatlLong or NYTM coordinates. The maps must be geometrically
correct and should register when overlaid on the appropriate USGSINYSDOT quadrangle control ticks.
4) Map Projection and Datum - The maps must include the map projection and the map datum used.
5) Map Title and Legend - The maps must provide a title and legend block describing the jnformation
contained on the maps.
6) Cartographic Quality - The quality of all map line work and symbolization must conform to items
1 - 6 in the map criteria set forth in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section outlined above.
17
OCT-27-1994 16:10 FROM
.
TO
8-9007l11f167651823
P.19
CONTRACT DATABASE STANDARDS
Delivery Media
All database and tabular files must be delivered on 4 mm Digital Audio Tape (OAT) or 3.5" diskette.
Delivery in another media fonnat must have prior approval of the Division.
Softwlll"e Format
All database and tabular files must be provided in Borland's Paradox for Windows version 4.5 format.
Other formats that are convertible to Paradox may be used with prior approval of the Division.
Geographic Attributes
Database and tabular files that contain elements with a geographic reference must provide a corresponding
data field and a geographic coordinate pait for each feature location.
18
TOTAL P.19
NOU-01-1994 17:13 FROM
.
TO
8-9007~167651823
P.04
4. Deljverables
A. A draft Local Erosion ManagmlUll Programfor the Town of Southold containing the foUowing
elmlUllS:
TASK A1:
Provide a descriptive analysis of the coastal area and shol"dine of the Town of
Southold that provides an understanding of the geological setting, coastal
processes, land use and flooding and erosion prone areas.
NOTE: The presentation of this task should be targeted at increasing the basic understanding of
coastal processes for Town officials, staff and local residents. Technical terminology should be
clearly explained to enable cOmprehension of the report.
Products:
A general description of the morphology of the coast. This will cover a description of the
geology, landforms, aquifers, wetlands and sediment within the coastal areas of the Town, the
location and geomorphology of coastal features such as beaches, dunes, bluffs, inlets, wetlands,
barrier landforms and rocky shorelines and the general conditions that led to their formation, how
these fearures function to abate flooding and erosion, factors affecting their stability and the
current natural resource values that they support.
A description and analysis of the natural coastal processes affecting the shoreline and the physical
forces driving these coastal processes, including wind and wave characteristics, storms, tides,-
currents, longshore sediment transport, and sea level rise.
A general change analysis of the coast addressing:
interaction of processes and natural fearures reflecting dynatnics of the coast
storm events and their role in shaping the coast
engineering projects and their role in shaping the coast.
A discussion of the existing land use patterns of the coastal area. A current land use map,
narrative and aerial photographs are available at the Town of Southold.
An identification of flooding and erosion prone areas. An overview of the existing regulatory
framework for erosion management
Map Products:
A map of the Town of Southold showing the srudy area and identifying the specific shoreline
reaches that comprise the inventory and analysis.
A map or series of maps depicting the shoreline and identifying the morphology of the coast,
land use and delineating the flooding and erosion prone areas within the Town.
TASK A2:
Analysis of hazard areas and development, including characterization of at-risk
development and identification of potential for additional development.
Products: .
For each reach provide a detailed inventory and description of the current shoreline and adjacent
3
NOU-01-1994 17:13 FROM ~
TO
8411f779-5167651823
P.05
upland including:
coastal morphology
coastal processes ,
flooding and erosion prone areas, including a discussion of the type and intensity
of hazards occurring in each reach and an identification of regulatory authority
and the location of their boundaries
land use and development
upland structures
in-water/shoreline structures
infrastructure
dredging and dredge spoil disposal
observations regarding current practices associated with land use and
development as they interact with coastal morphology and processes - examples
of current practices include structural engineering standards, regulatory
standards, site plan and development characteristics.
For each reach, pwvide an analysis of the current shllreline that has resulted from the interaction
of the above inventoried items. Use historic maps depicting past shoreline, the historic shoreline
maps of Long Island Sound currently being prepared for the Department of State (if available)
and past and present aerial photography to compare the current coastal process conditions to
historical conditions. The analysis should delineate where the current shoreline configuration is
a result of natural processes. It should also indicate where the shoreline confIguration has been
altered hy human interaction and assess the effects of public and private man-made shore'
protection structures, dredging and other uses on coastal processes and on the shoreline.
II
,
Within identified flooding and erosion prone areas provide a characterization of at-risk
development and identify the potential for additional develllpment. This should include a
discussion of development (type, siting, density, constraints and trends) in the flooding and
erosion prone areas and an identification of vacant parcels in these areas suitable for development:
Potential development of these vacant parcels should be presented, based on development trends
in these specific areas and within the con~ of development trends on adjacent lands within the
reach.
Provide an assessment of the suitability of current regulations and management practices in
flooding and erosion prone areas.
Map products:
A series of individual reach maps at 1:24,000 ideIItifying as appropriate, coastal processes, the
location of the flooding and erosion prone areas identified in TlISk AI, the detailed location of
natural features and development ,contained in these areas.
TASK A3:
Synthesis of reach analysis into townwide flooding and erosion management
issues .
NOTE: The presentation of this task should be targeted at increasing the basic understanding of
coastal processes for Town officials, staff and local residents. Technical terminology should be
clearly explained to enable comprehension of the report.
4
NOU-01-1994 17:14 FROM
.
TO
8-9007~167651823
P.06
Products:
Using information collected in the reach analysis outlined in Task A2, identify common flooding
and erosion issues and delineate sections of coast (management units) with common t100dio,g and
erosion management objectives.
Using the LISCMP erosion policy (policy IS) as guidance, identify flooding and erosion
management objectives which should be applied to identified management units, consider positive
and negative impacts of each objective. Management objectives identified in Policy #5 include:
minimize loss of life and structures througb the following steps in order of priority:
avoidance
vegetation
soft structUres
hard structures
protect and restore natural protective features
maintenance of public lands
navigation infrastructure and management
public investment
building codes
NOTE: This task requires consultation with DOS to apply regional policy to develop flooding
and erosion management objectives for the Town.
TASK A4:
Specific application of the LISCMP erosion policy (Policy #5) to the town..
including the geographic application of standards and the development of specific I i
structural or numeric standards.
Products:
Identification of specific policy standards from the LISCMP erosion policy (policy #5) to be
applied to the management units identified in Task A3.
Refined standards specific to the conditions in the Town of Southold ret1ectio,g flooding and
erosion management objectives for common management units, specific shoreline structures,
alongshore variations in coastal conditions, and applicable management measures.
Compare standards against local regulations. Identify where current regulations meets standards
and where changes are required. Suggest appropriate implementation.
NOTE: This task requires consultation with DOS to apply regional policy and develop policy
standards for the Town.
TASK AS:
Define post-storm recovery plans including recommendations for regulatory
coordination, decision making and public investment.
Products:
Define post-storm redevelopment and development goals for each management unit, consistent
with erosion management objectives.
Discuss various options for post-storm redevelopment and development and the impacts on future
5
NOV-01-1994 17:14 FROM...
TO
8iii0779-5167651823
P.07
hazard mitigatian.
Develap post-slOrm redevelapment and development recommendatians for each managemCllt unit
which will take advantage of the post-5lOrm environment 10 accomplish defined management
abjectives. Provide background 10 support these recommendatians.
Define procedures for post-slOrm redevelapment including standards far qualification for
emergency permitting and recommendatians for a procedure 10 establish coordinated between
Town, State and Federal agencies.
Define the areas where emergency public and private property protection is allowable and the
methods of protectian allawed within each management unit.
TASK A6:
Opportunities and aptians for implementing flooding and erasian management.
Produds:
Identify and describe capital projects to implement flooding and erasian management abjectives.
Provide an indicatian of cost, funding saurces and phasing.
Identify areas requiring consultation with the Department af Environmental Conservatian to-
abtain multi-year permits for lang-term management actians.
Provide options on additional resources required to achieve the management gaals such as studies;
maps, manilOring, coordination with ather agencies, taXing districts, and cost share arrangements. i ~
TASK A7:
IdClltify apportunities 10 use the results af this study to raise public awareness af
flooding and erosion issues.
Produds:
Provide recommendatians an haw the findings of this study can raise public awareness in support
af flaoding and erosian management objectives in the Town af Sauthald. Focus an where to
avaid development, what structural standards apply and how 10 accomplish flooding and erasion
management objectives.
B. A detailed eroswn nuuuzgemmr plan for shordine reach #2 Ultl/JJbtg from Duck. POI'Id PoW to.
Horron Pow.
Fallawing the general analysis af this reach completed in the Tasks A I-A 7, the consultant shauld
undertake a detailed investigatian af reach #2 using available information, including but nat
limited to. maps, air photos, site .inspectians, engineering models, and other available saurces.
In a separate section af the final draft Loca1 Erosian Management Program, a plan shauld be
presented which includes the following information for reach #2:
TASK Bl:
Examine the available historical maps and air phalO information for this reach
and identify areas of erasian, accretian and stability prior to 1964, from 1964 to
1974, from 197410 1984, and fram 1984 to the present with particular emphasis
on the impact af share pratectian structures.
6
NOU-01-1994 17:15 FROM
.
TO
8-900~167651823
P.08
Products:
Determine"the approximate rates of erosion and accretion over time. Describe the methodology
used to determine the approximate rates of erosion and accretion and assess the accuracy of the
calculated rates. This should include a table providing the distance each of these unstable
shoreline areas has moved landward or seaward over the specified periods of time and the rate
of erosion or rate of accretion for that particular area.
Discuss the relative contribution of incident coastal processes to the measured shoreline erosion.
Include also the contribution of factors affecting bluff stability in appropriate locations.
Map products:
Map showing the areas of erosion and areas of accretion based on an examination of historical
maps and air photos, and keyed to the table above.
TASK BZ:
Review the shoreline development within this reach.
Products:
Expanding on the analysis conducted in Task A2, provide a comprehensive presentation of the
land use adjacent to the shoreline in this reach, DOting developed shoreline parcels which would
be seriously inlpacted by continued shoreline flooding and erosion.
Discuss public and private land use practices in the reach which directly influence land stability
relative to "shoreline erosion. "
A table should be prepared identifying each of the shore protection structures within the reach
and providing a general description including the location, age, size, type of construction,
ownership of the structure, land ownership, pemrit history, and general condition of each
structure.
TASK 83:
Identify the direction of littoral drift, the net volumes of sediment transported in
the longshore direction, seasonal and annual variations in the longshore sediment
transport where possible, and the sediment sources and sinks.
Products:
Within the reach as a whole, and within the sub-reaches identified below, discuss the direction
of littoral drift and any variations that occur, the sedinlent sources and the sedinlent sinks that
may exist. Based on the physical shoreline changes identified in Tasks 81 and 82 and
calculations based on historical maps and air photos, a table should be included showing the
estimated net annuallongshore"transport volumes within the reach and sub-reaches over the time
intervals identified in Task B 1. .
Sub-reaches for the purpose of this analysis include:
1. " Duck Pond Point to Goldsmith Inlet
2. Goldsmith Inlet to Bittner Groin
3. Bittner Groin to westernmost Lockman Groin
4. Lockman Groin field
5. Kenny's Beach (easternmost Lockman groin to Kenny Rd)
6. Horton Beach (Kenny Rd to Horton Pt)
7
NOU-01-1994
17:16 FROM
.
TO
8~0779-5167651823
P.09
TASK B4
Using a sediment budget approach, determine the impact of each shore
perpendicular structure within this reach on the littoral transpon volumes and the
rate of shoreline erosion/accretion.
Products:
Pl'epare a simple sediment budget that would examine the sediment sources and sinks and identify
the quantities of sediment into and out of the entire reach and each of the sub-reaches identified
in Task B3, over each of the time intervals identified in Task B1.
Compare sediment transport between each time interval for each sub-reacb and the reach as a .
whole, to determine if measurable impacts are occurring as a result of existing shore protection
structures.. Where possible, impacts shoUld be quantified.
Compare measurable impacts due to disruption of longshore transport with erosion identified in
Task B I. Discuss whether resUlring the natural sediment transport would significantly reduce the
erosion that is presently occurring in these areas.
TASK B5:
Assess the condition of the shoreline in the reach with a focus on the beaches
adjacent Ul each of the shore perpendicular and shore parallel structures within
the reach.
Products:
Using the information developed in Tasks BI-B4, assess the condition of the shoreline in the'
reach in general and in the sub-reaches. Where feasible, note the impact of each shore I I
,
perpendicular and shore parallel structure within the reach.
Discuss the effects structures in the reach over time and the extent of these effects along the
shoreline.
Discuss the potential future shoreline condition assuming current management practices continue.
TASK B6.
Identify the range of methods available for addressing shoreline erosion
problems.
Products:
Using the general reach analysis completed in Tasks AJ-A6 and the specific reach information
developed in Tasks BI-BS, discuss the various options and combiilations of options available to
the Town for addressing erosion, including non-structural, soft-structural, and hard structural
methods, and the positive and negative impacts of each option. Identify appropriate timing for
implementation of options.
Discuss the effectiveness as an erosion control method, of modifying the existing shore protection
structures to restore the natural sediment transport. This discussion should be based on an
analysis of potential impacts which would occur in the reach derived from simple model studies
and available case histories.
Non-structural approaches should identify opportunities available to the Town for relocation,
acquisition, regulatory changes, zoning changes, fiscal expenditure changes, and various
8
. ,
NOU-01-1994 . 17:16 FROM
.
TO
8-9007~167651823
P.10
incentives and disincentives to influence development practices and existing land use. Discussion
of appropriate post-storm approaches should be included.
TASK B7:
Recommend the most suitable methodes) for short and long term management of
this section of shoreline.
Products:
Recommend the best methodes) of. managing this section of shoreline and the individual parcels,
based on a consideration of the existing conditions and future trends as presented in the general
reach analysis and clarified by this specific analysis.
If modification of existing shore protection is recommended, explain in detail the type of
alteration to be made, estinlate the cost to modify the structure, and discuss the positive and
negative inlpacts updrift and downdrift of the remaining structure due to typical coastal conditions
and severe storm events.
If non-structural alternatives are recommended, explain in detail the procedures which should be
followed by the Town for inlplementation. Estimate the cost(s} for this recommendation.
Discuss the positive and negative impacts which would result from this method. .
If structural alternatives are recommended, explain in detail the type of construction required,
estin1ate the cost of construction and maintenance, and outline the procedure which the Town
should follow for inlplernentation. Discuss the positive and negative impacts which could result
from this structural recommendation.
C. Five copie$ of the final draft weal Eronon ManagemcrJ Plan including CQt1I1tIe1IU on the draft
report provit:lLd by the lJepartmuIt oj State 01111. the ToW/! oj SoUlhold, 01111. a 3. S' floppy disk
COlllaining the report in WordPerfta S.l joTmlll.
5. Proposal Requirements
Each proposal received will be c:arefi1l1y evaluated for its technical merit. The following items must be
addressed in the proposal. Those proposals whicli most satisfactorily address the following items will
be considered in the final selection: .
A. A work program for performing the Flooding and Erosion Inventory and Analysis based on the
performance standards set forth in Section 3, Performance Standards, and provisions for
delivering all data products Iisteil in Section 4, De1iverables as a minimum. Work program
should show the Contractor's ability to provide the necessary products and meet the deadlines for
delivery described in Section 4, De1iverables. Work program should also discuss the
methodology and specify sources of information for performing the Local Erosion Management
Program.
B. Your firm's ability to perform me required services. Names, titles, qualifications, and relative
contribution of all the individuals who will be providing their services should be given for
evaluation. Indicate how tI1eir combined qualifications! assignments enable them to competently
9
NOV-01-1994 17:17 FROM
.
TO
8-900779-5167651823
.
P.ll
complete the work. Your firm's direct experience in the inventory and analysis of geological
conditions, coastal proces~ and hazard management planning in the coastal environment should
be presented.
C. Your finn's fee for performing the required services. The funding available for completing this
flooding and erosion inventory and analysis and plan development is limited to $45,000. For bids
up to this amount, full payment will be made for all services provided. Bids exceeding $45,000
will not be accepted. A list of all the data products in Section 4, Deliverables that could be
provided for a charge of $45,000 will be acceptable in the event that available funds are
insufficient to complete Section 4 in its entirety.
6. Schedule of Work
The following schedule of major milestones and accompanying completion dates shall be maintained in
developing the final draft Loca1 Erosion Management Program for the Town of Soutbold.
MAJOR MILESTONE: DUE DATE:
Issue Request For Proposal ..................................... . 11/94
Pre-proposal meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . _ 11/94
Proposal Due Date ............................................ 11/94
Proposal Review and Selection ................................... 11/94
Contract Award Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11/94
Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Work Program I I
and Meeting .......................................... 12/94 '
Public Meeting # 1 ........................................... 12194
Progress meeting wlTown & DOS ................................. 01/95
Progress meeting wlTown & DOS ................................ _ 02195
Draft Local Erosion Management Program ............................ 03/95
Public Meeting # 2 ............. ... ... ..... .................. - 03/95
Comments from DOS and Town on
Consultant Draft Report . . . . _ _ . . . . _ . _ . _ _ . . . . . . . . . _ _ . . . . . . _ . 03/95
Final Draft Local Erosion Management Program. . . . . . . . .". . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03/31/95
10
.
.
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFF1CER
RECORDS MANAGEMEm' OFFICER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 16, 1994
Philip C. Sears, Vice President
Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc.
117 East 29th Street
New York, New York 10016
Dear Mr. Sears:
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
This is to confirm that the Southold Town Board, at a regular meeting
held on December 13, 1994, accepted your proposal, at a fee not to exceed
$24,770.00, to provide consulting services for a Town of Southold Harbor
Management Plan, and your proposal, at a fee not to exceed $44,940.00,
to provide consulting services for a Town of Southold Local Erosion
Management plan. (Certified resolutions are enclosed.)
Your bid deposits on both proposals will be returned upon executed
of the agreements with the Town for the aforesaid services.
Very truly yours,
~~
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Enclosures
.
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
.
REGISTRAR OF VITAL srATIsrlCS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
RECORDSMANAGEMENTOF~CER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 16, 1994
Gregory T. Greene
Director of Environmental Programs
Cashin Associates, P.C.
1200 Veterans Memorial Highway
Hauppauge, New York 11788
Dear Mr. Green:
Please be advised that the Southold Town Board, at a regular meeting
held on December 13, 1994, accepted the proposal of Allee King Rosen &
Fleming, Inc., at a fee of $24,770.00, to provide consulting services for
a Town of Southold Harbor Management Plan. The Board also accepted the
of Allee King Rose & Fleming, Inc., at a fee of $44,940.00 to provide
consulting services for a Town of Southold Local Erosion Management Plan.
Thank you for submitting your proposals on these projects.
Very truly yours,
~~
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
.
.
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
Town HaJJ, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1800
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 13, 19911:
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby accepts
the proposal of Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc., at a fee not to exceed
$44,940.00, to provide consulting services for a Town of Southold Local
Erosion Management Plan, and authorizes Supervisor Thomas Wickham to
execute an agreement for said services, all subject to the receipt of the
New York State Grant for the study, and the approval of the Town
Attorney.
dAfd~~
r~~
Southold Town Clerk
December 111, 19911
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.-
.
.
A/RB/LL
PACKAGE
TRACKING NUMBER
751"3617'2
USE rillS AIRBILL FOR SHIPMENTS WITHIN THE CONTINENTAL U,s.,l... ALASKA AND HAWAII.
USE THE INTERNATIONAl AIR WAYBILL FOR SHIPMENTS TO PUff/TO fileD AND AlL NON U,S. LOCArIONS.
QUESTIONS? CALL 800-238-5355 TOLL FREE.
151"3117'2
10n-"Q2~-e
From (Your Name) Please Print
T. T....."
TOWN OF SOlJTI.fOl..D
MAIN R[J
8EN11E11'8 copy
Dale
11/./'tur ~ho~e Number {Very Important)
Slate
lfpRequired
To (Recipient's Name) P:ease Print
Ex~~~nntfliv~"&SOrpO,liPCOdeS)
Cityll2 ~.... A~la"
ZCUTHOlO HY 1 1 9 1 1
YOUR INTERNAL BILLING REFERENCE INFORMATION (optional) (First 24 charactm will appear on Invoice.)
:.1YMENT lli(Billsender 20 Bill Rocipienl's FedExAcct. No 3D Bill 3'd Party FedExAcet. No
Og~~~ AcctlCredilCardNo
SERVICES
(Check only one box)
~PrlOiiiYo;;om'iiiir - Sii.iidiiii~
(iJ.iimy 0, !Ie" "",;""" .'11O,",~" ([Ie"''''''k,'r:;;;~~~'~;;;:::r"''"
11 D ~lE~GING 51 0 ~I~~GING
16DFEDEXLmER' 56 o FEDEX LETTER "
12~FfDEXPAKo 52DFEDEXPAKo
13 D FEDEX BOX 53 D FEDEX BOX
140 FEDEXTUBE 54 D FEDEX ruBE
oonomy y \"8f'7'Itl'IMt
IO''''''rylJys"ona,,,m,,,,,",Y'! iR""""~(or",,/I()",,~",,,'.O~'
46 DffrJR
41 D~fr;&GE
"""""
(/()rp'CUg<'O,,"'I5IJIIJS)
70 0 OVERNIGHT 80 0 TWO-DAY
FREIGHT" FREIGHT"
((;on1'nnod ,...",at>on ,",,"'cedi
tDelrveryCQmm'ln1$11lmaj 'DocI.,edVal..l.JrmSSOO
be laleron some.""" "C.lllordeli~ sche<lllle
DELlVERV AND SPECIAL HANDUNG
_~__~,_<~?:!!" services required) __
HOLD IFill In { 1 D WEEKDAY
FOR
PICK-UP Box H) 31 D ~TURDAY
{ 20,"",EKDAY
DELIVER
3 0 ~r~~?:J:~e~;=;1
4 D DANGEROUS GOODS {Extracl1argel
50
6 0 g~.~u;GQ(!(I$sn,pper'$Decl.mIM not "qui"d
flo,<bl,e,Ll<IIl45, kg,1I1
7 o OTHER SPECIAL SERVICE
9 0 ~~=IPlCK.UP
o
12 D ~?;:.o:!::L1VERY (~~.w)
F HOLD FOR PICK-Up, Print FfDEX Ad ress ere
Street
Address
State
4DSil'Cred"Card
,,'
Date
PACMGfS WEIGHT YOUROEC/.ARElJ
I~P(J<Yl<JS VALUE
Only !s..~.gtr!)
-----,_._~-~_._,._-_._..,,-_._--.._-
SERVICE CONDITIONS, DECLARED VALUE
AND UMIT DF UABIUTY
UseollhisairbillconstitlI1esyouragreemenllolheservicecondilions
in our current Service Guide, available upon request. See back 01
semie,'s~opy oi lhi~ <\"0'" iur irllul"Odiiu,.. 3~I.i"" oUlo"il,ul", Il'dY
vary for Go,'e'nment Ovem,gl1l SerVice, See :.),S, Government
SeflliceGui(!etordetails
Total Total Total
We ",ill not ~c IC~~v~~:~:c :J, J~i' ~:~:'" :~ ~x~c:;~ cf S~88 ;cr
packa~e, whether lhe result of loss, damage, delay, non-delivery,
misdelivery, orm,sontormaMn, unless you declare a higher value,
o~y ~n ~dditional charge. and document vour actual 1055 for a timelv
cla,m.LlmltatlonsloundonthecurrentFederalExpressServlCeGUlde
apply,_Your right to recover from Federal Express for any loss,
loclud'flgiotflnslcvalueotthepackage.lossofsales,lncomelnteresl,
prolit, attorneys fees,cosls,and OIher forms of damage whelhe'
d,rect,lnGld$ntal,consequenMI,orspec,aIISllmrtedtOlhegreaterof
$100 or the dedared vatue speclfie<l to the left Recovery cannot
e~c~e:! aC"!~~' ~~~'~",e"'~~ !~~~. Tk~ "'~~,~.~"' ~~C'~,~~ \.I~',,~ ,~.
FeclExLetteranclFedExPakpackages's$500,QO
Ir Ihe even: r,f urk'c!y deliver,', F~(wJ: :=xpr~'<, ':,'i:1 " YCLr
requesl and w,th SOme IlmltaliQns refund alltransportaMn charges
pafd.SeeServlceGuldeforfurtherintormatlon
SenderauthQrizesFederatExpresstodl!I'verthisshipmentwithou!
~;~~~~ ted~~~regp~~~~al~~~ ~~~ ;I~r~s '~~;Rt~~~ t~~~ef~~d
DIM SH/PMENT(Chargeable Weight)
o
L
ibs.
w
x
H
x
20 On-CaR Stop
."nl)
518
!Z~'!lNO
ZIPRequired
Z/pRequired
I >'edera! E~press Use
I Base Charges I
I D<>r1,n>;v'-"cr'T,uge
.,
I Other 1
IOtherz
I Total Charges I
IREVISIONOATE6192
I FORMAT #'36
11361
!0199'-92FEDEX
PR(~TED I~
U.S.A
13:
i!lll
EO. . ~l c.
;~i~~
I~ ;j~ ~
~1i <.\ ~ ~ ~
Q5i!~ ~
.. --u,"",,",
!; r...~~ ~
g OJ-g~ ,...
td~~~ !
- ~ ~~. ~
~ffi:' ~
g",
$ "-, ~ ~
'g '0 i-5
~ ~.~ ~
iL<g~
,- 8 i1>
2~~g:
3 ::>~
~",;l
I. i? ~ ~
B.!l2.~
::m~J.~Jtt
~_ 8. ~ ~ it "j i~ :"
~ ;: " 15 0; ~
~~
.
~
~,
iEl~
N
o
;;
N
~
.
.
___________'1......
~
'.'
:;;
"j";r
: II! Iii
t., _ '" 3 0 3_
~~~~ ~ ~~
f,cnoS''"3
B:~ii.~!
538~~iil3
~, _gr~~;_~:a
o ;;: --'0 Q.~-g
~~~~~Q~
"' aC'''' '" ~
S_:;-S'~~ s
~<a 0.,< g ~
bY'S.. 2.: [
~:~a~l~?
.
~':l'
05
<; ~
"c"
~;~
'0
~,~ ~
?75 ..
. 0'
0-'
":0.<11
~.wii
0_'
-o~
;;",,:!:
:r~S'
0;;0
~-~.~
g g ~
,-",,,,
;-;;;~. ~
~~ a i
~]-;; "'"
g a~. ~
0; ~ 3 =
~'1il; ii
~ ~ ~ iI
tl.!2.~ ..
'0'
,,~~
'" _ii'
~ ~i
c ._
2" ~
d-
~. B g
1'"
,~J
'F
~;I
IJ
!l
~
.,
~
"
"
'"
~
!l1
..
Ol
..
r,-"
::r0
~~
",,-,
"~
lR~
~ :
?o...
w~
,.
, ,
g!
~~
~~
~o
-,
f
- ~
II
~
.
::!'''-
~~w
" .
g,:;:! :
ao-
~~g
i-Il>~
0.0
~ llii
~ =0.
~",ij
~,~ ~
g~g ::a
:> g~ ~
;~ ~
"'5 ~
3 ~ ;;
~ ~ ;::
- ::;
~ ~ ~
~
;0 ~
ti ~
~ III ;:,:
~l i
3. ~
~!
~~
'~
!i
h
,.
g- ~:'
g g'"
~;~
"--
0-"",
. .
gg-~
"'~&
am-
~i1?
3lZ8
",_".e:.
Q ~ S
il", ~
:i'g ~~
~~~
:;: '.' - "'"
-, ~
i:!
is
~
~
...
,; ~
~
s
"
...
::;
~
..
=
i
..
ii
OJ
=
~
..
~
ill
..
og
" c. ~
:~gfn5
:{~~i
'= ~ '.c ".l
~-jf i
nn
c~ c. "' co
"'c."'''
~gl5~
~;;~~
~8~~
l'2.5l,'l
~ ~~;,
~ ~ 1"8
OQ.'>I_
~
~a
" "
00
Ob
"00
~.m
g~
=5
Qm
5C1)
j~
:g ~
J'il
-.,
~~
!O
g=
0"
w:S
, !;l
j OJ
.
",E.f_
~ "'2
-, '!f ~
,
,
~
~
"-
,
I
c
.
.
i
.
00
'7c ~ ~ ~
" g ~
E ~ =~
.~t[t
~j~~
~ HH~
illiiH
".- ~ ~,~iid i
~ .9:.x.,;r;
;: ~a f'!'2 =
&:.:&3_~&~
~,;. ~ ~~<g: (':l
..; ,- 5i ga-~ ;:
'i 330";;!!
~~ HH
g ~~~ I
it 3"'0 i:
...., ~ s!i
~35'
dO';;;
!a!2"~
s~g
"u:> -
sc'
l
~~
C-'GlCl)
:~i!
~ a~,~
~ ~ (OJ 15-:"
; ".p
~ ?-
li!
!e
"
...
'"
..,
<or"
~ ~
~
Vi'"
~ e
g P.
o
o
"
.
~t;~:~~~~ ~>
~~-~I~~~~i~
~ R:;t$~ft"'iilm1,=;
t lllllliil!.
~ a S&(".~Q~-e:~ ~ ~
i I HfiUH ~ i
~~~a~~~~~
5. ~.g ~ I: () :l
~Sf~~~~!<.
H': .. I "
,3' 0 ii g[ ~ :
u; ~! ~ 1
~rd~-~-"
;,!j~~.j~
:>~~ ~~ ~ ~
! j; ! f ~ .
gg ~ j i" ; I
,
~~
o ~
,
.
,
~
g
I
i
.
.
"
.
.
.
"~
o.
"
ro>
<ra
::=
?~
€~
,
~. i
iJdi
~t
~ ~o
~ ~ i ~
~ ~~!B
~ ~i-~
~ ~~ =
~ ,,OJ
~ 0
I ~
g
~?7
:\,)
~ r :~
,oj
000
ia2:o
.
~~g
",;:::1>
$"'~ a
i. ~!
<0
.'
~: g' L
.,-
liR
I
.
i
~
~
~
~
I
.
I
~- ~ g =lj '"
"~, '" 3 II> ~<
, 0 Sl. OIOG 0
}~~i~:i
"~~~Q~~
l!im
~~~i
~ ~ ~ ~i;
" "8r
~~!~i!
;;; ~!il 3':'
gs:~ ".'"
.~; I~"-
_~~ i ~
._,
;~~ t~
a ~::o i-
j-~~ . &
. ' ~':<
;i3 i:
!;~ ~.'
_0.5' ..
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
,.
I
I
I
I
, I
, I
I
. I
I
I
I
I
I
. .
Local Erosion
Management
~ Plan
Proposnl
SUBMITTED TO:
tho Town of Southold
SUBMITTED BY:
All"" King Rosen & Fleming. Inc.
December G. 1994
INVOICE NO.
ALLt:.1:: KING KU::it::N & t-LEMING INC.
. --. DESCRIPTION' -----p:NlrOlCEAMOUa DEDUCTION
I 4.500.00 .00
0012990
DATE
------ ~
AMOUNT
11-29-94
112994.10 SECURITY DEPOSIT
4 ~ :;::,00 . 00
CHECK
DATE
12-01-94
~~~~~_....!299~ J TOTALS__.4. 500....CJ~-r_
I'LEAsr: DETACH THIS PORTION AND RE1AIN FOR YOUR HECOR[lS
4 . 500 :?.<='...J
.Oc)
,
ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING INC.
117 EAST 29TH ST
NEW YORK, NY 10016
LV National
17 ~ Westminster ~9.? 5TH AVE
\.'::.\--.1 Bank USA NEW YOnK. N.Y 10036
0012990
1.32/210
(1 ::~~ ;- ":t "'if ~ :;:': ~ r:-~ ~,
\....... "".. ..;.: j,! <i,:.i ..: t_'.~. '''''''
Pay:
Four
thousand
..fr,iliM~ ~:WvGtfEF:.~r,.t;1R~vl~.w'l,and
Yf, I, __...... .. ;-. '.: _' _ _: ,_ _ tJ~~"')" I'll
I'}';~;,','. '~.:": :~:.:::::-,'::)' ~\;:::8RS~TE
1'0
cents
CHECK NO
AMOUNT
I"
O/.~ ::~~-:C!1-:1.0":T O;<;~J)" 51.~ -.f!..9 4
'.JILl_Am, OF":f'{;jllH:t'~-'-lDJ. ,..'ce...,. '.'. "54 7)
.'.',1 .~." ,,~, /. c.. ..." . r .2i?
~~~;~._".:~:"... . ~~2~
f;Ut:Wi!Z9d S~gn3tur~
08 NOT OF-SiROY
lI'O~2'1'10Il' I:02WOO:l221: 25'1~ 51,
_ _7!1~~~___
PAY
TO THE
ORDER
OF
1_
~ b 5 211'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
Allee
King
Rosen &
Fleming, Inc.
Environmental and Planning Consultants
117 East 29th Street. New York, NY 10016. 212/696-06'iU
FAX Number 212/213-319t
December 5, 1994
Ms, Judith Terry, Town Clerk
Town of Southold
53095 Main Road
Town Hall, New York 11971
RE: Proposal to Provide Consulting Services
Town of Southold Local Erosion Management Plan
Dear Ms, Terry:
Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc, is pleased to submit this proposal to
provide planning and environmental services to the Town of Southold for the
preparation of its Local Erosion Management Plan, As stated in the request for
proposals,
the purpose of this study is to identify coastal and flood-
ing erosion hazard areas, to regulate land use and develop-
ment in those hazard areas, to identify appropriate beach
management practices for mitigating the impacts of flooding
and erosion on specific shoreline reaches, to educate and
raise public awareness of coastal flooding and erosion and
warn of the dangers of development in coastal hazard areas,
and to establish post-storm recovery guidelines and stan-
dards for regulatory coordination and decision making fol-
lowing storm events.
For this project, we have assembled a project team that specifically meets
the Town needs as defined by the scope of work, Our team is composed of:
Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc, is well known throughout the state as a
leader in the field of environmental analysis, waterfront planning, and
policy development, We are a multidisciplinary consulting firm with par-
ticular experience in waterfront studies and coastal zone management.
Allee King will lead the team and be responsible for the report prepara-
tion; undertaking the environmental, coastal erosion, and planning inves-
tigations; drafting and organizing the policies and recommendations; over-
all project management; and client contact,
Moffatt & Nichol Engineers will provide the technical support in the
shoreline dynamics and erosion studies, Currently, the firm is involved
in a number of projects in the area, including a study of erosion along
the entire north shore of Long Island, and is known across the country for
its work in coastal engineering.
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I.
I
I
I
.
.
Ms. J. Terry
-2-
December 5, 1994
The Saratoga Associates will lead the Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
mapping on this project. Saratoga is highly experienced in GIS mapping
and presentation.
Our team members bring to this project a full range of services, with
experience in the field of waterfront and coastal management planning, the
issues related to erosion control and flooding management, policy formulation,
and waterfront environmental concerns and shoreline dynamics.
Our proposal consists of:
o
Section I: Auuroach to Work. Here we explain the methods and tech-
niques, references, models, and strategies for undertaking each task
in the proj ect.
o
Section II: Organization and Schedule. We outline the organization
to the project team, including the Town and state staff and the ef-
forts and responsibilities of The team members.
o
Section III:
by task, and
Proiect Costs. This provides the hours of effort, costs
the rates for each team member.
o
Section IV:
projects and
ual resumes.
Oualifications and Exuerience. Briefs on the various
experience of the firms are provided as well as individ-
Also enclosed is the required certified check for 10 percent of the pro-
posal fee.
We believe we offer the diversity of knowledge, skills, dedication, and
experience to provide a high quality product that will allow the Town to move
forward with its local erosion management planning and complete an important
element in its Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). As you know, we
have submitted a proposal on the Harbor Management Plan study, which is also to
be an element in the LWRP.
If you or anyone in the selection group has any questions about our pro-
posal, please call me at (212) 340-9795. Thank you for this opportunity; we
hope to work with the Town on this interesting project.
Sincerely,
ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, Inc.,
f~e~
Philip G. Sears
Vice President
cc: R. White
I
I
I I.
I II.
I III.
IV.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
Table of Contents
Approach to Work................................................................................................................1_1
Organization and Schedule ................................................................................................11_I
Cost Estimates and Rates .................................................................................................111_1
Project Team Experience, Resume, and References .......................................................IV-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. .
I. Approach to Work
[JIlntroduction
As stated in the Request for Proposals (RFP). the goal of
this study is to develop a strategy for erosion control and
flood management in the coastal areas of the Town of
Southold. To this end, a draft Local Erosion Management
Plan will be prepared and become part of the Southold
Local Waterfront Revitalization Program, several ele-
ments of which are already completed. This study will
also be used to provide guidance for local officials in
drafting regulations to effectuate the goals and recom-
mendations of the plan. While this is a comprehensive
townwide shoreline study, the reach of major focus is
from Duck Point to Horton Point (Reach #2, a distance of
about 8 miles) on the shores of Block Island Sound shore-
line.
An ancillary purpose of this document is to increase local
understanding of coastal process and dynamics. Local
officials, staff, and residents will use this document to
assist their understanding of the issues in their town
regarding coastal erosion and flooding, and then make use
of this information in the decision-making process.
[]I Overview to the Work Program
This comprehensive proposal is for erosion control man-
agement within the Town that focuses on the Long Island
Sound shoreline. Specifically, the results of this study are
to:
. Identify coastal flooding and erosion hazard areas,
while discussing the coastal geological conditions,
natural and altered shoreline dynamics at work,
and the natural resources characteristics and land
use and development trends in the coastal zone;
. Apply to the Town the erosion policies and stan-
dards contained in the state's Long Island Sound
Coastal Management Program, as well as the exist-
ing federal, state, and local regulations, with specif-
ic recommendations resulting from this study for
the regulation ofland use and development in haz-
ard areas, focusing on Reach #2 and other critical
areas, as appropriate;
. Advise the Town on appropriate beach manage-
ment practices to mitigate the impacts of flooding
and erosion along specific shoreline reaches, partic-
ularly Reach #2;
. Develop hazard management goals, options, and
recommendations to improve long-term hazard
management within the Town;
. Recommend public education opportunities and
raise awareness to coastal flooding and erosion,
warning of the dangers of development in coastal
hazard areas; and
. Suggest post-storm recovery development guide-
lines and standards for regulatory coordination and
decision-making.
Work undertaken for the Town germane to this current
investigation and available data and materials from previ-
ous studies includes:
. A townwide inventory of natural erosion protection
features;
. Information on dredging;
. Federal Emergency Management Agency flood
maps and regulations;
. Local ordinances on bluff and wetland setbacks;
. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program 12-
Natural Erosion Protection Features;
. Local Waterfront Revitalization Program 15-
Waterfront Fortifications;
. A report on the failure of the Goldsmith jetty;
. Historic data on the Goldsmith jetty;
. Aerial photographs of the Town from 1988 and
1993;
. A listing of properties that have Town trustee per-
mits for docks, bulkheads, jetties, groins, and
houses;
. A list of moorings; and
. Certain technical data that may be available from
the Department of State's (DOS) shoreline change
analysis of Long Island Sound, although a final
report is not expected to be completed.
In addition, the Department of State is in the process of
completing the Long Island Sound Coastal Management
Program (USCMP), which outlines erosion control
polices. The Governor's Coastal Task Force has also
developed a series of goals, principles, and objectives for
local erosion control management. This study will build
on the policies and recommendations contained in these
documents and further these efforts with recommenda-
tions specific to the Town of Southold waterfront.
~ Project Tasks
As outlined in the RFP, there are a number of major
tasks to this study. Each of these is discussed in greater
detail below. A listing of deliverables and product con-
tents for each task is provided in Table 1-1. The tasks are
I-I
I . .
Table I-I
I OVERVIEW OF PRODUCTS AND DELlVERABLES
TASK TEXT DISCUSSION MAP PRESENTATION
I Al . Coastal geomorphology . Overall map of the town
showing the study area
. Natural coastal processes and reaches
I . Coastal dynamics and influences . Map or series of maps
. Existing land use patterns depicting coastal
geomorphology, land use,
I . Identification of flooding areas and erosion-and flood-
. Erosion-prone areas prone areas for each
I A2 . Shoreline inventory and adjacent upland for each reach . Reach maps (at 1:24,000)
identifying coastal
. Discussion of historic evolution of coastline processes and flood- and
I Identify flood- and erosion-prone areas and "at risk" erosion-prone areas,
. natural features, and
development development land use
. Assessment of the suitability of current regulations and patterns
I practices
A3 . Identify common flooding and erosion issues
I . Delineate areas of common issues
. Identify flooding and erosion management objectives
I A4 . Apply LISCMP policies to town
. Refine standards to town issues and Objectives
. Compare standards against local regulations
I AS . Define post-storm recovery plans
. Make recommendations for each management unit
I . Define post-storm recovery procedures
. Define areas for emergency public/private property
I protection
A6 . Identify capital projects, costs, and funding sources
. Determine areas for multi-year DEC permits
I . Provide options on achieving management goals (maps,
monitoring, coordination)
I A7 . Provide recommendations on increasing public awareness
of flooding and erosion
Bl . Determine approximate rates of erosion over time . Delineate areas of erosion
I . Describe methodology used and accretion keyed to
table
. Provide a table showing distances of change
I . Discuss the impacts of incident coastal processes
I
I 1-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TASK
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
.
.
Table I-I (Continued)
OVERVIEW OF PRODUCTS AND DELlVERABLES
TEXT DISCUSSION
. Provide information of land use patterns and changes
. Discuss land use practices that could affect shoreline
stability
. Provide a table of shore protection structures and
characteristics
. By subreach, discuss coastal dynantics
. Provide a table on net longshore transport volumes
. Prepare sediment budget analysis
. Determine impact of existing shoreline protection features
. Assess impact of restoring natural transport
. Assess shoreline conditions
. Discuss effects of shoreline structures
. Discuss potential future condition
. Present shoreline management options and phasing to town
. Discuss effectiveness of method
. Consider non-structural approaches
. Make recommendations for short- and long-term
management
. Explain in detail procedures and costs for structural and
non-structural approaches
. Discuss positive and negative impacts of recommendations
, 1-3
MAP PRESENTATION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I. Approach to Work
.
.
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
organized below, for both the townwide study and the
Duck Pond Point to Horton Point Reach #2 substudy,
under three major headings: 1) baseline studies; 2)
analysis; and 3) policies and recommendations. This
organization allows the presentation of interim products
to the Town and State (this is described in greater detail
in section II, "Organization and Schedule").
Task I: Baseline Studies
A. Townwide
A-I Using text and graphics, this task will essentially be
an introduction and overview of the shoreline condi-
tions and coastal forces within the Town, providing
an overview of the Town's shoreline characteristics
and natural features. Designated New York State
Department of State (DOS) Significant Coastal Fish
and Wildlife Habitats will be identified. Forces that
have shaped the coast-such as wind, waves, tides,
incident storms, longshore sediment transport, and
sea level rise-will be described. This task will intro-
duce and explain the various terminologies used in
coastal analyses and set the geologic setting, coastal
processes, land use, and flooding and erosion areas
along the shore.
Sources and references for this discussion will
include most of the previously prepared studies list-
ed above, supplemented by field surveys, as appro-
priate. Storm and tide data will be compiled from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and the National
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA). These will focus on major storms and
weather data in the 20th century, with particular
focus on the post-war period (1955-present). Recent
publications and issues related to sea level rise will
be presented (e.g., the findings of the National
Research Council). Other references on general
coastal dynamics will be used to augment the discus-
sion.
A-2 With text and a graphic for each reach, this task will
look specifically at the 10 reaches that comprise the
study area and compile data, inventory, and describe
the coastal conditions, forces at work, and trends.
Graphics will show the shoreline conditions with
contours and patterns to display the principal natur-
al features, such as bluffs, dunes, and wetlands.
Specifications on the graphics are provided at the end
of this section. The text will describe the evolution of
the current shoreline and what natural processes, as
well as those altered by human interaction, are at
work. This section will also provide a historic
overview of the coastal changes, including historic
coastal and survey maps, such as the U.S. Coastal
Survey maps of 1838 and 1892, and the Belcher Hyde
survey maps of 1906, 1916, and other available and
appropriate years as well as aerial photographs.
Locally produced aerial photographs dating back to
1955 are available and the Town has photographs for
1993. Older photographs are available from the
National Archives; however, the resolution of these
photographs is typically marginai to poor, and it can
take a long time to obtain them.
Coastal land uses and trends will be taken from avail-
able references and interviews with the Planning
Department. Current land uses will be mapped and
future conditions and proposed projects identified
based on these trends and the available land in the
study area.
Federal rules and regulations (e.g., COE dredging and
filling, construction in navigable waters permits and
Federal Emergency Management Act rules and regu-
lations). New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (DEC) rules and regula-
tions (e.g., Coastal Zone Erosion Act, tidal wetlands).
and Town regulations (e.g., zoning setbacks) of
coastal area development will be presented as well as
an assessment of their adequacy as protection mech-
anisms.
B. Reach #2
B-1 Focusing on the shoreline between Duck Pond Point
and Horton Point, a distance of about 8 miles, we pro-
pose to examine erosion rates and coastal change over
the periods between 1955 and 1964, 1964 and 1974,
1974 and 1984, and 1984 and 1993. Aerial pho-
tographs are available for the Town for the years
1955, 1963, 1966, 1969, 1972, 1977, 1984, and 1988.
Therefore, some minor adjustments in the periods of
analysis described in the RFP may have to be made,
unless there are other sources oflocally available data
or photos. We anticipate working at a scale of 1"=200
(consistent with the scale of the Town's 1993 aerial
photography). We will map the water's edge and/or
base of bluff and the edge of vegetation to assess the
changes in beach configuration and beach width.
Matching these features over time with common ref-
erence points, rates of erosion and accretion will be
calculated and presented. The focus of this analysis
will be to asses the impact of coastal erosion struc-
tures on natural dynamics. Any evident incident
changes will be identified. If the Town has any his-
torical topographic maps from subdivision or site
1-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I. Approach to Work
.
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
plan applications or other sources, they would also
be helpful in assessing changes along the waterfront.
Text, tables, and graphics will chart the evolution of
the shoreline over these time periods.
B-2 Working with the Town Planning and Building
Departments, we will gather land use and develop-
ment trend data along this shoreline reach, including
both public and private land use activities. Shoreline
parcels that could be seriously impacted by erosion
will be highlighted. Based on the available data, a
table will be prepared on each of the shore protection
structures along this reach.
B-3 Using the available data on currents and shoreline
changes, engineering modeling will be undertaken to
calculate longshore transport volumes. We will use
models developed by COE's Coastal Engineering
Research Center as well as proprietary models. This
will be done for each of the six subreaches identified
in the RFP.
B-4 Using a simplified sediment budget approach, sedi-
ment sources and sinks (as well as sources into and
out of the reach and its subreaches) will be calculat-
ed for the four time periods presented under B-1.
Changes that are attributable to shoreline protection
structures will be the focus of this effort, with a dis-
cussion on how the restoration of natural patterns
could change erosion conditions along this reach.
B-5 Based on the work undertaken in B-1 through B-4,
assess the current conditions for the reach and sub-
reaches, identify the historical impact of shoreline
protection structures on beach dynamics, and project
the future conditions under the current shoreline pro-
tection techniques.
Task 2: Analysis
A. Townwide
A-3 This task will establish a number of shoreline types
(e.g., eroding bluffs, stable rocky shoreline, sandy
beach, etc.) along the Town's coastline that share
common flooding and erosion characteristics. Using
the LISCMP erosion policies as guides, Town flood-
ing and erosion control management issues and
objectives will be defined by reach. Before undertak-
ing this work, we will consult with the Town and
DOS to apply those regional policies for the Town.
B. Reach #2
B-6 A range of methods for addressing the shoreline ero-
sion issues within Reach #2 will be identified. These
could include modifying the current structures as
well as non-structural, soft-structural, and hard-struc-
tural methods, with the positive and negative impacts
of the alternatives presented as well as phasing.
Models and case histories will be provided. A dis-
cussion of appropriate post-storm approaches will be
provided.
Task 3: Recommendations
A. Townwide
A-4 We will submit to the Town and State a list of specif-
ic standards and objectives for erosion control and
flood management for each common management
unit that will serve to meet the standards and objec-
tives of the LISCMP erosion policies, while address-
ing the specific erosion and flooding concerns of the
Town. Where furtherance of local regulations is
appropriate, such recommendations will be made as
well as an implementation strategy. Before undertak-
ing this task, we will consult with the Town and DOS
to apply the regional policies for the Town.
A-5 We will establish a series of goals for implementing
post-storm recovery plans that are consistent with
management objectives. We will document all sup-
port for these recommendations. Areas and proce-
dures for emergency permitting, and allowable public
and private protection methods for each management
unit, will be defined.
A-6 We will outline opportunities, techniques, and con-
straints for implementing the proposed recommenda-
tions. These will include cost evaluations, funding
sources, and phasing; multiyear permits for long-term
actions; additional studies; and mouitoring and fund-
ing techniques, such as taxing districts, which are
mechanisms used in many towns to provide tax for
the specific users of a municipal service or improve-
ment.
A-7 We will present methods and techniques for increas-
ing public awareness, including examples from other
coastal jurisdictions as available. We will focus on
how to avoid development in risk areas, what stan-
dards should apply, and steps to achieve the progrsm
objectives.
B. Reach #2
B-7 We will make a series of recommendations that are
specific to the Duck Pond Point to Horton Point reach and
the individual parcels along the reach. This could include,
but not be limited to, shoreline protection structure
1-5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I. Approach to Work
.
South old Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
modifications. For each recommendation, cost and other
impacts-such as regulatory, coastal dynamics, costs, tim-
ing and phasing, and natural resources impacts-will be
assessed. A matrix will present the evaluation of the alter-
natives on a single table.
Task 4: Draft and Final Report Preparation
On completion of the above tasks, text, graphics, and all
work will be documented into a draft report, with five
copies to be submitted to the Town and State for review.
It is likely that interim reports and memos will be sub-
mitted during the course of completing these tasks. We
will incorporate comments or recommendations made on
these interim products. We will provide a glossary, and
all technical terminology will be explained. There will be
two parts to the report: a townwide Local Erosion
Management Plan and a detailed unit for the Reach #2.
The report will include a discussion of the methodologies
used as well as all references and sources of information.
After the report is issued, a public meeting will be held to
present and discuss the draft plan. To complete the study,
a final report will be prepared that will incorporate the
comments and recommendations of the Town and State.
Text and graphics will be modified accordingly and five
final copies will be submitted with the necessary com-
puter disks.
i!l!II GIS Mapping Approach
A. Inventory
Working closely with the Town and state, we will devel-
op a digital inventory of natural and built features within
the study area. We are experienced in using both
ARCIINFO or MapInfo for the creation and analysis of
digital inventories and will work with the Town to deter-
mine which software best meets the project needs.
As an initial action, we will meet with the Town and state
to define in greater detail what is needed for each data
layer, determine to what extent existing data will meet the
needs of the project, and prioritize the data development
process. The project budget does not allow creating a hard
copy map of the inventory; however, the digital informa-
tion will be submitted to the Town. Subsequent actions
for developing and managing the GIS inventory are out-
lined in Appendix A (GIS Management Approach).
To the extent possible, we will rely on existing digital
data that meet the data standards outlined in Attachment
3 of the RFP. For example, it is our understanding that
digital parcel boundaries, parcel centroids, and shoreline
boundaries for the town have been prepared by the
Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA). We also antici-
pate using existing Digital Line Graph (DLG) data to rep-
resent roads, streams, and many other elements of the
inventory.
B. Develop Quality Assurance and Quality
Control (QAlQC) Procedures
Our experience indicates that tight project schedules and
limited budgets may compromise cartographic integrity.
Therefore, we propose a stringent QAlQC procedure to
protect the inventory and client requirements.
To ensure that all data included in the inventory are suit-
able for the project purposes, procedures will be estab-
lished to verify that certain quality standards are met.
Standard indicators of data quality to be considered
include:
. Positional Accuracy. How exact is the geographic
location ofthe features represented in the data
layer;
. Accuracy of Attribute Information. Is the informa-
tion associated with geographic features correct;
and
. Completeness of the Data Layer. Are there features
missing from the data later.
Each data layer will go through a process of QA/QC
checks before it is approved for inclusion in the invento-
ry, including:
. In-process checks (occurring as the data layers are
being developed, by using such techniques as set-
ting digitizing error tolerance); and
. Town of SoutholdlNYSDOS review.
C. Document Data Sources and Quality
To use the inventory in a convenient and accurate man-
ner, it is important that a detailed record of information
contained within each data layer be maintained. A "data
dictionary" will be designed to catalog pertinent informa-
tion about each of the data layers. The following are
examples of the type ofinformation to be included in the
data dictionary:
. Data layer name;
. Vintage;
. Scale;
. Data source;
. Description of attribute information; and
. Last update.
1-6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I. Approach to Work
.
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
D. Develop Initial Attribute Coding Scheme
Information about a geographic features will be stored in
an appropriate reference coding system. These codes are
then used to efficiently select, query, and analyze geo-
graphic features.
E. Establish Data Layer Naming Convention
A logical system for naming the different data layers will
be developed, allowing for descriptive and unique com-
puter file names.
F. Establish Backup Procedures
To minimize recovery time due to data loss, procedures
will be routinely followed to back up all compiled source
data, work-in-progress, and complete data layers.
G. Establish GIS Format
We will use either an ARC/INFO or MapInfo GIS format
for the project. The data layers developed in the next
phase will then be stored in the preferred GIS format.
1-7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. .
II. Organization and Schedule
[J!I Project Organization
As shown in the organization chart (Figure II-ll. this pro-
ject will be a cooperative effort between the Town, the
state, and the consultant team. Ultimately, this work will
become part of the Local Waterfront Revitalization
Program and provide guidance to local officials in their
planning and decision-making. Therefore, this study will
be conducted under the guidance of a subcommittee of
the Town's Waterfront Advisory Committee and coordi-
nated by the Town's Director of Community
Development, with technical assistance and input from
the Department of State's Division of Coastal Resources
and Waterfront Revitalization.
Allee King's project manager will be Mr. Philip Sears. Mr.
Sears has extensive experience and background in coastal
geomorphology issues and is widely published in the
field of maritime and coastal program and policy. As pro-
ject manager, he will be responsible for, oversee, and
organize all work products and technical data and will be
actively involved in the development and preparation of
the report. A full copy of Mr. Sears' resume is provided
below in section N of this proposal.
Mr. Robert White will serve as Deputy Project Manager.
Mr. White is a seuior environmental planner, a member of
the American Institute of Certified Planners, and a
licensed Professional Planner in the State of New Jersey.
He has more than 11 years' experience in the profession,
with much of his work focusing on coastal environment,
master planing, and zoning. Mr. White has led a number
of large and complex environmental studies for the firm
that have addressed coastal development issues, and has
also obtained federal permits for construction in water
(Section 10) and dredging (Section 404). A full copy of
Mr. White's resume is also provided in section IV.
Working with Allee King will be Mr. John Headland of
Moffatt & Nichol. Mr. Headland has extensive experience
in shoreline management, coastal engineering, shore pro-
tection design, and modeling/assessment of shoreline
processes. He has also led a number of projects on the east
end of Long Island. Graphics will be prepared by Saratoga
Associates under the direction of Brian McMahon.
A strong working relationship among the Town's staff and
representatives, the State's technical experts, and the con-
sultant team will be crucial to the success of this study.
The relationship will include the Town trustees, many of
whom have a working knowledge of the issues at hand;
the members of the Waterfront Advisory Committee and
the Local Erosion Management subcommittee; the
Departments of Planning and Community Development;
and other appropriate agencies. This combined and coor-
dinated effort will be vital both in gathering baseline data
and developing constructive and practical policies and
recommendations.
As part of this cooperative effort, we also anticipate local
assistance ("in-kind services) from Town staff, commit-
tees, and other representatives in a number of areas,
including making previously prepared reports, back-up
files, and summaries readily available; establishing local
contacts and arranging meetings with Town departments
and representatives as well as other individuals; assis-
tance in field surveys and interviews; arranging public
notices and organizing the public meetings, as well as
providing any handouts or project summaries; and provi-
sion of craft for marine field investigations.
[]I Project Schedule
This project requires a sizable work effort over a very fast
track,about 3 months or 12 weeks (see Figure II-2). Our
team brings to this project a proven record of providing
quality work in a timely and efficient manner. Allee King
Rosen and Fleming, Inc. has a multidisciplinary staff of
more than 40 planners, engineers, environmental scien-
tists, and transportation and historic resources specialists
on whom we can draw to complete this effort. Moreover,
this diversity in staff and experience allows us to address
specific environmental and planning issues as they occur
in the course of this effort. We are joined on this project
by a team of experts and professionals individuals equal-
ly dedicated and respected in their ability to provide high
quality products on a fast track schedule.
Allee King believes in close communication with clients.
To achieve this goal, from the start of work we will estab-
lish ongoing contact with Town and state staff. We have
found this to be the most effective technique for ensuring
client satisfaction and a high quality product. The infor-
mation compiled to date will be the starting point for this
investigation. We propose a start-up meeting in late
December between the Town, the state, and the consul-
tant in which the project team can exchange ideas and
available data and reports, as well as establish group and
individual responsibilities and roles in the project stud-
ies. In addition, three project team meetings would be
held to coordinate the team and ensure product quality
and schedule. At these meetings, certain products.such as
mapping and the results of data gathering, will be pre-
sented for review. This will expedite and simplify the
II-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
Town of Southold
Waterfront
Advisory Committee
Local Erosion Management Plan
Subcommittee
New York Town of Southold
Department of State Director of
Division of Coastal Resources Community Development
and Waterfront Revitalization
Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc.
Moffatt & Nichol Engineers
The Saratoga Associates
Figure II-I
Project Organization
Local Erosion Management Proposal
-------------------
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
TASKS
Consultant Selection
and Start of Work
III
.
Collection of Baseline Data
III
Data Inventory and Analysis
.
Development of
Draft Erosion Management Plan
III
Preparation of Draft Report
Town and State
Review of Draft Report
Incorporating Comments,
Final Amendments, and
Submission of Five Copies
.
III Project Team Meetings
. Public Meetings
Figure 11-2
Project Schedule
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
II. Organization and Schedule
.
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
review of the final product. We also propose a closiog
meeting to present the final report.
Two public meetings are proposed. The first is tentative-
ly scheduled for late December. However, to increase the
opportunity for public input (which is difficult to obtain
duriog the holiday season), we feel that an early January
meeting would be preferable. These meetings could be
held jointly with those on the Harbor Management Plan,
which is on the same schedule.
11-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. .
III. Cost Estimates and Rates
Provided on the following page (Table ID-l) are the total
estimated costs for the work to be undertaken and the
hours of effort. Billing rates for Allee King Rosen &
Fleming, Inc., Saratoga Associates, and Moffatt & Nichol
are provided in Table ID-2. It has been discussed that pay-
ment on the project could be tied to the submission of
interim products rather than a single final fee. Subject to
approval by the Town, we request that consideration be
given to the following payment schedule: 50 percent on
submission of baseline conditions, 30 percent on submis-
sion of a draft report, and 20 percent on completion of
work.
III-I
-------------------
SOUTHOLD LOCAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PLAN
ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, Inc.
COST ESTIMATES
Sr. Sr. Total Labor Direct Total
Task Off. Plan. Map. Plan. Tech.! Tech.2 Hours Cost Expenses Cost
AI. Description of Coastal Area 0 4 4 8 0 40 56 $2,940 $100 $2,940
Features and Dynamics
A2. Analysis of Hazard Areas and 4 8 4 12 0 40 68 $4,180 $50 $4,180
Development
A3. IdentitY Flooding and Erosion 2 12 0 16 0 0 30 $2,3 80 $50 $2,380
Management Issues
A4. Apply LISCMP Policies 0 8 0 4 0 0 12 $940 $50 $940
to Town
AS. Post Storm Recovery Planning 2 8 0 4 0 0 14 $1,260 $100 $1,310
A6. Opportunities and Options 0 16 0 4 0 0 20 $1,620 $50 $1,620
for Flooding/erosion Man.
A7. Recommendations for Public 0 2 0 12 0 0 14 $950 $100 $950
Awareness
B1. Examine Historical 0 24 8 80 0 40 152 $9,600 $250 $9,600
Erosion Rates
B2. Land Use and Erosion 0 4 0 12 0 0 16 $1,120 $100 $1,120
Protection Inventory
B3. IdentitY and quantitY 0 40 0 8 0 0 48 $3,920 $50 $3,920
Littoral Changes
84. Prepare Sediment Budget 0 24 0 8 0 0 32 $2,560 $50 $2,560
Analysis
B5. Assess Present and 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 $680 $250 $680
Future Shoreline Conditions
B6. Present Shoreline Management 0 8 0 2 0 0 10 $810 $100 $810
Options
B7. Recommendations 4 16 4 8 0 0 32 $2,800 $50 $3,050
Draft Report Preparation 0 4 0 8 16 0 28 $1,740 $250 $2,240
Final Report Preparation 0 4 0 8 8 0 20 $1,300 $500 $1,400
ManallementIMeetings 4 16 0 16 0 0 36 $3,040 $100 $5 240
TOTAL 16 206 20 210 24 120 596 $41,840 $2 200 $44 940
.
.
Dee 5, 1994
I
III. Cost Estimates and Rates
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
Table III-2
HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE
Allee King Rosen & Fleming. Inc.
Officer
Senior Planner
Planner
Technician 1
Tecbnician 2
$160
85
65
55
45
Moffat & Nichol
Supervisory Engineer/Scientist 114
Senior Engineer/Scientist 108
Engineer/Scientist I 70
Senior Technician 82
Drafter 49
Saratoga Associates
Senior Mapper
Technician 1
11I-3
70
45
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. .
IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References
Introduction to the Team
Our project team is composed of:
. Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc.. one of the lead-
ing planning and environmental consultants in
New York State;
. Moffat & Nichol, a leading firm in coastal engineer-
ing with extensive experience on Eastern Long
Island
. The Saratoga Associates, a planning and engineer-
ing firm with extensive experience in land planning
and mapping; and
Provided below are details on each of these firms.
Allee King Rosen & Fleming
[JI Overview
AIlee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc., founded in 1981, is a
consulting firm specializing in emironmental and plan-
ning services. Since its establishment, the firm has grown
into one of the largest and most respected environmental
planning firms in New York State. The firm's cost-effec-
tive and timely performance is rooted in the expertise of
our professionals and our reputation for skillful and pro-
ductive interaction with the public and, in particular,
governmental agencies. The firm's experience includes
preparing environmental analysis and providing techni-
cal expertise for government agencies and private clients.
Since opening its doors more than 13 years ago, the firm
has undertaken more than 500 planning and environmen-
tal projects, a large number of which were multifaceted or
politically sensitive. Tbese projects range from master
planning studies for municipalities and community
groups to environmental reviews for complex and contro-
versial development projects.
[]I Planning and Environmental
Services
The firm offers a full range of planning and environmen-
tal services, including:
. Marina, Port, and Other Waterfront Facilities
Analysis
. Coastal Zone Management
. Waterfront Revitalization Program Consistency
Determination
. Wetlands and Ecosystem Evaluation
. Land Use Planning and Impact Analysis
. Water Quality Sampling and Modeling
. Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology
. Hydrogeology
. Permit Applications and Acquisitions
. Community Resources Planning and Analysis
. Demographic Analyses
. Socioeconomic Impact Analysis
. Real Estate Market Analyses
. Employment, Fiscal Impact, and Local and Regional
Economic Analysis
. Cost-Benefit Analysis
. Relocation Planning and Analysis
. Community Character Impact Assessment
. Historic and Archaeological Studies
. Traffic Impact Studies
. Environmental Geology and Soils
. Public Participation Programs
~ Selected Waterfront and
Coastal Projects
Culloden Point Subdivision, Town of East
Hampton, N.Y.
The firm prepared an environmental impact statement
(EIS) for this 52-unit subdivision proposed in the Town of
East Hampton. With some 292 acres of waterfront land
and 1.3 miles of project coastline (much of which is steep
bluffs) along Fort Pond Bay and Block Island Sound, ero-
sion along the shoreline and the potential impacts of the
project on the stability of the bluffs was a major issue for
the project. To assess trends over time, U.S. coastal maps
dating back to 1838 were reviewed, wave action analyses
were performed, photographic records before and after
major coastal storms were recorded, an evaluation of aer-
ial photographs from 1955 and 1992 was undertaken, and
historical topographic maps of the site were compared.
These analyses led to the establishment of appropriate
setbacks for structures and the development of vegetation
preservation easements along the bluffs. Other issues
were the preservation of wetlands, potential impacts on
archaeological features (both historic and prehistoric),
protection of historic resources, protection of vegetation
and rare and endangered species, preservation of views of
the site from the water and of natural topographic fea-
tures, and traffic and transportation. This project is cur-
rently in subdivision review by the Town Planning Board.
IV-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References
.
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
Colgate-Palmolive Company-450-Slip Marina
Design, Jersey City, N.J.
The most important issue raised with this project was
how to design a marina that could attenuate waves from
winds and boat traffic at an exposed location, where the
Hudson River meets New York Harbor, while being envi-
ronmentally sensitive and meeting the regulatory require-
ments of the State of New Jersey. Wave studies showed
that the largest impacts were from boat traffic along the
Hudson River, particularly tugboats and ferry traffic to the
Statue of Liberty. A system was developed that adequate-
ly attenuated the wave wakes while meeting the prevail-
ing environmental standards. Other issues addressed
were public access and compatibility with the proposed
waterfront promenade at the water's edge, the presence of
dilapidated underwater piers, riparian issues, the dredg-
ing and disposal of 40,000 cubic yards of sediment, poten-
tial view impacts on the Statue of Liberty from a nearby
public park, and the availability of maritime support ser-
vices as well as pump-out facilities and amenities for
transient boaters. Allee King worked with the marina
designers and the state to ensure that certain design ele-
ments and public amenities were provided, which led to
the issuance of the project's waterfront development per-
mit in September 1990.
Colgate-Palmolive Army Corps of Engineers
Permits, Jersey City, N.J.
Allee King provided environmental and planning services
and led a project team through the federal regulatory
process to obtain permits for the Colgate-Palmolive inter-
im waterfront recreation and infrastructure improvement
projects. This included a mooring field for 104 craft as
well as a boathouse, pier rehabilitation, repair and
replacement of about 1,100 feet of bulkhead, a ferry ser-
vice, and the in-water construction of a manifold to col-
lect and abate combined overflow discharges to the
Hudson River. Issues addressed were the safety of moor-
ing boats at this location, public access to the redeveloped
pier, and the ecological and water quality impacts of fill-
ing the river to construct the proposed manifold. An
extensive alternatives analysis was developed that dis-
closed no practicable alternative for the routing of the
proposed manifold. The analysis also revealed the mani-
fold's impact on water quality to be beneficial, not harm-
ful. Working with the Army Corps of Engineers, the
Environmental Protection Agency, the National Marine
Fisheries Service, and the Fish and Wildiife Service, all
issues were resolved and a mitigation plan developed.
Federal permits for the project were issued in June 1994.
Jakobson Shipyard, Oyster Bay, N.Y.
The firm has secured permits and is currently managing
the dredging and disposal of 5,000 cubic yards of sedi-
ment at this former maritime construction and repair
facility. Much of this sediment contains hazardous mate-
rials and is being disposed of at an upland location. For
this effort, the firm designed an innovative sediment
cleanup program that employs a vacuum removal system.
With this approach, the contaminated sediment can be
removed without the suspension of additional material
and impacts on the water column. This work is being
monitored by NYSDEC, the Friends of Oyster Bay, the Bay
Constable, and the National Fish and Wildlife Service.
Maritime Support Services Location Study, Port
of New York and New Jersey
This study focused on the land and berthing needs of the
maritime support service firms-tugs, barges, and supply
craft-in the Port of New York and New Jersey. The first
task was to identify all the maritime support service firms
on the port and their locations. The number of floating
equipment, their type, and the number of employees for
each company were determined by interviewing the com-
panies and researching published sources. The growth of
the industry was projected to 2000 and their needs for
new equipment, employees, and land were determined.
Siting considerations including hydrographic conditions,
markets, and supplies, were analyzed for all areas of the
port. Candidate areas were identified for each of the dif-
ferent kinds of maritime support services. Within the can-
didate areas, specific locations were chosen as example
bases for maritime support service firms. Conceptual lay-
outs were developed for each site, and the development
costs were estimated. The costs were annualized, and the
ability of maritime support service finns to absorb these
costs were discussed. Finally, a list of recommendations
for maintaining these firms in the port through 2000 were
developed. Most of the recommendations have been
implemented since the report was issued.
Hudson River Park, New York, N.Y.
The firm is leading a consultant team to prepare a Generic
EIS (GElS) and provide other services relating to the plan-
ning and environmental review of the proposed Hudson
River Park. The project, sponsored by the New York State
Urban Development Corporation, would provide for the
renewal of Manhattan's west side waterfront by develop-
ing a park and selected existing piers as public recreation,
residential, and/or commercial uses along an approxi-
mately 4-mile-long area on the Hudson River. Upon
IV-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References
.
South old Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
completion, it will be the largest park developed in
Manhattan since the expansion of Riverside Park in the
1930's.
Major issues of the project include its consistency with
the city's Waterfront Revitalization Program; preserva-
tion of sensitive historic and archaeological resources;
visual quality, as a result of the changed character of the
waterfront; effects on the habitat and aquatic systems of
the river; increased pedestrian activity; traffic, air quality,
and noise, since the park would be adjacent to Route 9A;
and increased wastewater generation.
Chelsea Piers, New York, N.Y.
The Chelsea Piers Limited Partnership retained the firm
to prepare the environmental impact statement for the
proposed redevelopment of the Chelsea piers (Piers 59
through 62) on the Hudson River for a variety of commer-
cial and recreational uses. The key environmental issues
are consistency with the city's waterfront zoning and
Waterfront Revitalization Program, historic and archaeo-
logical resources, economic conditions, traffic and trans-
portation, water quality, and natural resources.
Howland Hook Container Terminal-
Environmental Services, Staten Island, N.Y.
The firm was retained by Container Transport
Technology, Inc. to provide ongoing consulting concern-
ing general environmental issues relating to New York
City's administrative processes and the permitting
process at the state and federal level. Container Transport
Technology, Inc. representing the United States Lines, is
involved in the phased expansion of the Howland Hook
Marine Terminal in Staten Island, the largest container
port facility on the East Coast. The terminal expansion
was being undertaken as a joint venture between the Port
Authority of New York and New Jersey and the city of
New York.
Lake Erie Waterfront Analysis and Projections,
Buffalo Metropolitan Area, N.Y.
As part of an analysis prepared for submittal to NYSDEC,
the firm analyzed land use and economic changes in the
Lake Erie waterfront area of the Buffalo metropolitan area.
The analysis included real estate sales and values, land
use plans and zoning, and economic growth. The area is a
pattern of residential neighborhoods, parkland, and com-
mercial areas. As the Buffalo metropolitan area has
grown, the Lake Erie waterfront has been undergoing
changes. For a primary area of about five miles and a
broader secondary area, the analysis addressed the effects
of policy changes on existing land uses and their \iabili-
ty, land use plans and zoning, and real estate sales and
values, as well as market responsiveness to changes.
Village of Southampton Planning/Impact Study,
Southampton, N.Y.
The firm prepared a planning study analyzing de\'elop-
ment trends currently affecting the character of the
Village of Southampton in Long Island and suggested spe-
cific methods to shape future growth. The report focused
on topics of particular concern in Southampton, includ-
ing change in community character, loss of open space,
retail expansion, water quality, traffic, beach access, and
affordable housing.
Payton Lane Nursing Home and Rehabilitation
Center, Town of Southampton, N.Y.
Located on a site that lies partially within the Town and
partially within the Village of Southampton, this project
involves the construction of a 2BO-bed facility and a
senior day care center. The firm prepared an EIS in which
the principal issues are site design and visual character,
community facilities, traffic and transportation, geohy-
drology, and wastewater treatment.
The firm prepared an EIS for a proposed 300-unit water-
front housing complex at Prince's Bay. The residential
development is planned to include condominium apart-
ments, a 100-slip marina, and other recreational facilities.
The EIS includes aquatic and terrestrial ecology analysis,
a wetlands assessment, and analyses of water quality,
land use, transportation, and archaeological impacts. The
firm is also providing guidance to obtain dredging and
disposal permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and NYSDEC, and will review the project's eligibility for
flood insurance as administered by New York City. The
project's relationship to the city's Waterfront
Revitalization Program was also analyzed.
Queens West Waterfront Development,
Queens, N.Y.
The firm was retained by the Port Authority of New York
and New Jersey to prepare an EIS for a proposed large-
scale mixed-use development on the Hunters Point
waterfront in Queens, N.Y. With more than 1-1/4 miles
of shorelines, major issues with this site were public
access, waterfront recreation, water quality, and coastal
zone management. Other EIS issues were land use, zon-
ing, and community character; social and economic con-
ditions; open space and recreational facilities; historic
IV-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References
.
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
and archaeological resources; visual quality; and traffic
and transportation.
East River Landing, New York, N.Y.
The firm provided environmental services and permit
acquisition support for this project, which would be
located on 23 acres of platform construction over the East
River, adjacent to the financial district of Lower
Manhattan. Located south of the South Street Seaport, the
project is envisioned as a major mixed-use development
to be constructed on pilings and a series of platforms.
Public amenities and improvements, such as the contin-
ued expansion of the East River esplanade, would also be
provided as part of the project.
The location and scale of the project necessitated a com-
prehensive environmental impact analysis, with special
emphasis on the relationship of the project to the South
Street Seaport Historic district (including an underwater
archaeological study); traffic, transportation, and air qual-
ity impacts; water quality and marine biology; and urban
design and planning policy. A range of environmental
permits, including federal dredge and fill (Section 404),
structures in navigable waterways (Section 10), state tidal
wetlands, water quality (Section 401), and consistency
with the city's Waterfront Revitalization Program would
be required.
Regatta Cove, Staten Island, N.Y.
The firm prepared an ElS for Regatta Cove, a major mixed-
use development consisting of approximately 300 resi-
dential condominium units and two lSD-slip marinas,
located on the South Shore of Staten Island. The project
is situated in the New York State Coastal Zone
Management Area administered by the New York City
Waterfront Revitalization Program. The firm has heen
involved in the initial environmental planning to help
minimize waterfront damage and to facilitate permit
approvals. These include a Section 10 permit from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a Title 15 permit from New
York State for disturbance of a streambed, and dredging
permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
Department of Environmental Conservation. A notable
feature of the project is the creation of a tidal wetlands as
the focus of a primarily residential complex. Significant
issues addressed for the ElS include consistency with the
Waterfront Revitalization Program, change in neighbor-
hood character, site access through the area's limited
vehicular road network, and effect on wetlands and the
marine environment.
HarborPointe Redevelopment Project,
Bridgeport, Conn.
The firm was retained by the Bridgeport Redevelopment
Agency to provide technical services and manage the
preparation of an ElS for this major waterfront redevelop-
ment project in downtown Bridgeport. The project, which
is jointly sponsored by public and private interests, pro-
poses to redevelop an underutilized 135-acre parcel of
Long Island Sound waterfront area and represents the
most substantial development in the city's history. It
would include residential, office, retail, and industrial
buildings; and a 1 ,ODD-slip marina. The full range of envi-
ronmental analyses were undertaken for this complex
project: land use and community resources (including
displacement and relocation), historical resources, eco-
nomic and fiscal conditions, traffic and transportation, air
quality, water resources, noise, infrastructure, and munic-
ipal services.
Town of Cortlandt, New York, Master Plan,
Cortlandt, N.Y.
In June 1991, Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. complet-
ed a new Master Plan prepared for and in conjunction
with the Town of Cortlandt in Westchester County. The
first phase of the Master Plan project involved the prepa-
ration of a Goals and Objectives Statement that highlight-
ed the critical planning concerns identified by the Town.
Focusing on these identified areas of concern, a Base
Studies report was prepared that provided a community
profile, a services and infrastructure assessment, and an
environmental setting assessment. Policy recommenda-
tions were developed by analyzing issues identified in the
base studies in concert with the Town's goals and objec-
tives, The next phase was the preparation of a Draft
Master Plan. The plan included n~arly 120 policy recom-
mendations. as well as open space, land use, and circula-
tion plans and a detailed strategy for implementation.
Final public review and the preparation of a Generic ElS
to satisfy SEQRA requirements were also completed. The
Town Board of the Town of Cortlandt approved the
Master Plan, with minor modifications, in January 1992.
Town of Cortlandt, Zoning Ordinance Revision
GElS, Cortlandt, N.Y.
The firm has been retained to prepare the GElS in support
of the new Town of Cortlandt Zoning Ordinance.
Implementation of a comprehensive revision to the ordi-
nance was a key component of the recently completed
Town Master Plan (also prepared by the firm). The GElS
will compare the proposed and existing ordinances and
highlight the changes and new features associated with
IV-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References
.
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
the revised ordinance. The GElS will examine the poten-
tial impacts on land use, community character, natural
resources, and cumulative and growth-inducing aspects
of the proposed zoning ordinance.
US Truck Body Plant, Jamaica Bay, N.Y.
With the assistance of NYCEDC, this project is a proposed
expansion of an industrial manufacturing complex on
two city-owned parcels adjacent to Barbados Basin on
Jamaica Bay in Rockaway, Queens. Of particular impor-
tance are an analysis of effects on breeding areas for birds
and other wildlife; the probable loss of a roost site for a
small number of black-crowned night herons, a colonial
water bird known to nest at two locations in Jamaica Bay;
the loss of upland foraging habitat; and impacts on adja-
cent tidal wetlands. Mitigation measures to lessen these
impacts were proposed. The project's effects on coastal
zone management, storm water runoff, land use and zon-
ing, community resources, visual quality, historic and
archaeological resources, social and economic conditions,
traffic and transportation, air quality, noise, infrastruc-
ture, and hazardous materials are also analyzed.
i!lI Resumes
Resumes for Philip C. Sears, Robert M. White, Arnold F.
Fleming, and William Reynolds follow directly after page
IV-5 of this section of the proposal.
[}II References
Mr. John J. Huston
Real Estate Project Director
Colgate-Palmolive Company
300 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022-7499
212-310-3030
Ms. Lisa Liqouri, Director
Town of East Hampton Planning Department
300 Pontigo Place
Town of East Hampton, New York 11937
516-324-2178
Mr. Allan Marchisotto
Moran Towing
2 Greenwich Plaza
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
203-625-7846
IV-5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. .
IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References
Introduction to the Team
Our project team is composed of:
. Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc., one of the lead-
ing planning and environmental consultants in
New York State;
. Moffat & Nichol. a leading firm in coastal engineer-
ing with extensive experience on Eastern Long
Island
. The Saratoga Associates, a planning and engineer-
ing firm with extensive experience in land planning
and mapping; and
Provided below are details on each of these firms.
Allee King Rosen & Fleming
EJI Overview
Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc., founded in 1981, is a
consulting fIrm specializing in environmental and plan-
ning services. Since its establishment, the fIrm has grown
into one of the largest and most respected environmental
planning fIrms in New York State. The firm's cost-effec-
tive and timely performance is rooted in the expertise of
our professionals and our reputation for skillful and pro-
ductive interaction with the public and, in particular,
gove=ental agencies. The firm's experience includes
preparing environmental analysis and providing techni-
cal expertise for gove=ent agencies and private clients.
Since opening its doors more than 13 years ago, the firm
has undertaken more than 500 planning and environmen-
tal projects, a large number of which were multifaceted or
politically sensitive. These projects range from master
planning studies for municipalities and community
groups to environmental reviews for complex and contro-
versial development projects.
[]I Planning and Environmental
Services
The fIrm offers a full range of planning and environmen-
tal services, including:
. Marina, Port, and Other Waterfront Facilities
Analysis
. Coastal Zone Management
. Waterfront Revitalization Program Consistency
Determination
. Wetlands and Ecosystem Evaluation
. Land Use Planning and Impact Analysis
. Water Quality Sampling and Modeling
. Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology
. Hydrogeology
. Permit Applications and Acquisitions
. Community Resources Planning and Analysis
. Demographic Analyses
. Socioeconomic Impact Analysis
. Real Estate Market Analyses
. Employment, Fiscal Impact, and Local and Regional
Economic Analysis
. Cost-BenefIt Analysis
. Relocation Planning and Analysis
. Community Character Impact Assessment
. Historic and Archaeological Studies
. Traffic Impact Studies
. Environmental Geology and Soils
. Public Participation Programs
~ Selected Waterfront and
Coastal Projects
Culloden Point Subdivision, Town of East
Hampton, N.Y.
The fIrm prepared an environmental impact statement
lEIS) for this 52-unit subdivision proposed in the Town of
East Hampton. With some 292 acres of waterfront land
and 1.3 miles of project coastline [much of which is steep
bluffs) along Fort Pond Bay and Block Island Sound, ero-
sion along the shoreline and the potential impacts of the
project on the stability of the bluffs was a major issue for
the project. To assess trends over time, U.S. coastal maps
dating back to 1838 were reviewed, wave action analyses
were performed, photographic records before and after
major coastal storms were recorded, an evaluation of aer-
ial photographs from 1955 and 1992 was undertaken, and
historical topographic maps of the site were compared.
These analyses led to the establishment of appropriate
setbacks for structures and the development of vegetation
preservation easements along the bluffs. Other issues
were the preservation of wetlands, potential impacts on
archaeological features (both historic and prehistoric),
protection of historic resources, protection of vegetation
and rare and endangered species, preservation of views of
the site from the water and of natural topographic fea-
tures, and traffic and transportation. This project is cur-
rently in subdivision review by the Town Planning Board.
IV-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References
.
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
Colgate-Palmolive Company-450-Slip Marina
Design, jersey City, N.j.
The most important issue raised with this project was
how to design a marina that could attenuate waves from
winds and boat traffic at an exposed location, where the
Hudson River meets New York Harbor, while being envi-
ronmentally sensitive and meeting the regulatory require-
ments of the State of New Jersey. Wave studies showed
that the largest impacts were from boat traffic along the
Hudson River, particularly tugboats and ferry traffic to the
Statue of Liberty. A system was developed that adequate-
ly attenuated the wave wakes while meeting the prevail-
ing environmental standards. Other issues addressed
were public access and compatibility with the proposed
waterfront promenade at the water's edge, the presence of
dilapidated underwater piers, riparian issues, the dredg-
ing and disposal of 40,000 cubic yards of sediment, poten-
tial view impacts on the Statue of Liberty from a nearby
public park, and the availability of maritime support ser-
vices as well as pump-out facilities and amenities for
transient boaters. Allee King worked with the marina
designers and the state to ensure that certain design ele-
ments and public amenities were provided, which led to
the issuance of the project's waterfront development per-
mit in September 1990.
Colgate-Palmolive Army Corps of Engineers
Permits, jersey City, N.j.
Allee King provided environmental and planning services
and led a project team through the federal regulatory
process to obtain permits for the Colgate-Palmolive inter-
im waterfront recreation and infrastructure improvement
projects. This included a mooring field for 104 craft as
well as a boathouse, pier rehabilitation, repair and
replacement of about 1,100 feet of bulkhead, a ferry ser-
vice, and the in-water construction of a manifold to col-
lect and abate combined overflow discharges to the
Hudson River. Issues addressed were the safety of moor-
ing boats at this location, public access to the redeveloped
pier, and the ecological and water quality impacts of fill-
ing the river to construct the proposed manifold. An
extensive alternatives analysis was developed that dis-
closed no practicable alternative for the routing of the
proposed manifold. The analysis also revealed the mani-
fold's impact on water quality to be beneficial, not harm-
ful. Working with the Army Corps of Engineers, the
Environmental Protection Agency. the National Marine
Fisheries Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, all
issues were resolved and a mitigation plan developed.
Federal permits for the project were issued in June 1994.
jakobson Shipyard, Oyster Bay, N.Y.
The firm has secured permits and is currently managing
the dredging and disposal of 5,000 cubic yards of sedi-
ment at this former maritime construction and repair
facility. Much of this sediment contains hazardous mate-
rials and is being disposed of at an upland location. For
this effort, the firm designed an innovative sediment
cleanup program that emplo)'s a vacuum removal system.
With this approach, the contaminated sediment can be
removed without the suspension of additional material
and impacts on the water column. This work is being
monitored by NYSDEC, the Friends of Oyster Bay, the Bay
Constable, and the National Fish and Wildlife Service.
Maritime Support Services Location Study, Port
of New York and New jersey
This study focused on the land and berthing needs of the
maritime support service firms-tugs, barges, and supply
craft-in the Port of New York and New Jersey. The first
task was to identify all the maritime support service firms
on the port and their locations. The number of floating
equipment, their type, and the number of employees for
each company were determined by interviewing the com-
panies and researching published sources. The growth of
the industry was projected to 2000 and their needs for
new equipment, employees, and land were determined.
Siting considerations including hydrographic conditions,
markets, and supplies, were analyzed for all areas of the
port. Candidate areas were identified for each of the dif-
ferent kinds of maritime support services. Within the can-
didate areas, specific locations were chosen as example
bases for maritime support service firms. Conceptual lay-
outs were developed for each site. and the development
costs were estimated. The costs were annualized, and the
ability of maritime support service firms to absorb these
costs were discussed. Finally, a list of recommendations
for maintaining these firms in the port through 2000 were
developed. Most of the recommendations have been
implemented since the report was issued.
Hudson River Park, New York, N.Y.
The firm is leading a consultant team to prepare a Generic
EIS (GElS) and provide other services relating to the plan-
ning and environmental review of the proposed Hudson
River Park. The project, sponsored by the New York State
Urban Development Corporation, would provide for the
renewal of Manhattan's west side waterfront by develop-
ing a park and selected existing piers as public recreation,
residential. andlor commercial uses along an approxi-
mately 4-mile-long area on the Hudson River. Upon
IV-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References
.
South old Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
completion, it will be the largest park developed in
Manhattan since the expansion of Riverside Park in the
1930's.
Major issues of the project include its consistency with
the city's Waterfront Revitalization Program; preserva-
tion of sensitive historic and archaeological resources;
visual quality, as a result of the changed character of the
waterfront; effects on the habitat and aquatic systems of
the river; increased pedestrian activity; traffic, air quality,
and noise, since the park would be adjacent to Route 9A;
and increased wastewater generation.
Chelsea Piers, New York, N.Y.
The Chelsea Piers Limited Partnership retained the firm
to prepare the environmental impact statement for the
proposed redevelopment of the Chelsea piers (Piers 59
through 62) on the Hudson River for a variety of commer-
cial and recreational uses. The key environmental issues
are consistency with the city's waterfront zoning and
Waterfront Revitalization Program. historic and archaeo-
logical resources, economic conditions, traffic and trans-
portation. water quality, and natural resources.
Howland Hook Container Terminal-
Environmental Services, Staten Island, N.Y.
The firm was retained by Container Transport
Technology, Inc. to provide ongoing consulting concern-
ing general environmental issues relating to New York
City's administrative processes and the permitting
process at the state and federal level. Container Transport
Technology. Inc. representing the United States Lines, is
involved in the phased expansion of the Howland Hook
Marine Terminal in Staten Island. the largest container
port facility on the East Coast. The terminal expansion
was being undertaken as a joint venture between the Port
Authority of New York and New Jersey and the city of
New York.
Lake Erie Waterfront Analysis and Projections,
Buffalo Metropolitan Area, N.Y.
As part of an analysis prepared for submittal to NYSDEC,
the firm analyzed land use and economic changes in the
Lake Erie waterfront area of the Buffalo metropolitan area.
The analysis included real estate sales and values, land
use plans and zoning, and economic growth. The area is a
pattern of residential neighborhoods, parkland, and com-
mercial areas. As the Buffalo metropolitan area has
grown, the Lake Erie waterfront has been undergoing
changes. For a primary area of about five miles and a
broader secondary area, the analysis addressed the effects
of policy changes on existing land uses and their viabili-
ty, land use plans and zoning, and real estate sales and
values, as well as market responsiveness to changes.
Village of Southampton Planningllmpact Study,
Southampton, N.Y.
The firm prepared a planning study analyzing develop-
ment trends currently affecting the character of the
Village of Southampton in Long Island and suggested spe-
cific methods to shape future growth. The report focused
on topics of particular concern in Southampton. includ-
ing change in community character, loss of open space,
retail expansion, water quality, traffic, beach access, and
affordable housing.
Payton Lane Nursing Home and Rehabilitation
Center, Town of Southampton, N.Y.
Located on a site that lies partially within the Town and
partially within the Village of Southampton, this project
involves the construction of a 280-bed facility and a
senior day care center. The mm prepared an EIS in which
the principal issues are site desigo and visual character,
community facilities. traffic and transportation, geohy-
drology, and wastewater treatroent.
The firm prepared an EIS for a proposed 300-unit water-
front housing complex at Prince's Bay. The residential
development is planned to include condominium apart-
ments, a 100-slip marina, and other recreational facilities.
The EIS includes aquatic and terrestrial ecology analysis,
a wetlands assessment, and analyses of water quality,
land use, transportation, and archaeological impacts. The
firm is also providing guidance to obtain dredging and
disposal permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and NYSDEC, and will review the project's eligibility for
flood insurance as administered by New York City. The
project's relationship to the city's Waterfront
Revitalization Program was also analyzed.
Queens West Waterfront Development,
Queens, N.Y.
The firm was retained by the Port Authority of New York
and New Jersey to prepare an EIS for a proposed large-
scale mixed-use development on the Hunters Point
waterfront in Queens. N.Y. With more than 1-1/4 miles
of shorelines, major issues with this site were public
access, waterfront recreation. water quality, and coastal
zone management. Other EIS issues were land use, zon-
ing, and community character; social and economic con-
ditions; open space and recreational facilities; historic
IV-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and Referl!nCes
.
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
and archaeological resources; visual quality; and traffic
and transportation.
East River Landing, New York, N.Y.
The firm provided environmental services and permit
acquisition support for this project, which would be
located on 23 acres of platform construction over the East
River, adjacent to the financial district of Lower
Manhattan. Located south of the South Street Seaport, the
project is envisioned as a major mixed-use development
to be constructed on pilings and a series of platforms.
Public amenities and improvements, such as the contin-
ued expansion of the East River esplanade, would also be
prmided as part of the project.
The location and scale of the project necessitated a com-
prehensive environmental impact analysis, with special
emphasis on the relationship of the project to the South
Street Seaport Historic district (including an underwater
archaeological study); traffic, transportation, and air qual-
ity impacts; water quality and marine biology; and urban
design and planning policy. A range of environmental
permits, including federal dredge and fill (Section 404).
structures in navigable waterways (Section 10). state tidal
wetlands, water quality (Section 401), and consistency
with the city's Waterfront Revitalization Program would
be required.
Regatta Cove, Staten Island, N.Y.
The firm prepared an EIS for Regatta Cove, a major mixed-
use development consisting of approximately 300 resi-
dential condominium units and two lSD-slip marinas,
located on the South Shore of Staten Island. The project
is situated in the New York State Coastal Zone
Management Area administered by the New York City
Waterfront Revitalization Program. The firm has been
involved in the initial environmental planning to help
minimize waterfront damage and to facilitate permit
approvals. These include a Section 10 permit from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a Title 15 permit from New
York State for disturbance of a streambed, and dredging
permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
Department of Environmental Conservation. A notable
featnre of the project is the creation of a tidal wetlands as
the focus of a primarily residential complex. Significant
issues addressed for the EIS include consistency with the
Waterfront Revitalization Program, change in neighbor-
hood character, site access through the area's limited
vehicular road network, and effect on wetlands and the
marine environment.
HarborPointe Redevelopment Project,
Bridgeport, Conn.
The firm was retained by the Bridgeport Redevelopment
Agency to pro,'ide technical services and manage the
preparation of an EIS for this major waterfront redevelop-
ment project in downtown Bridgeport. The project, which
is jointly sponsored by public and private interests, pro-
poses to redevelop an underutilized 135-acre parcel of
Long Island Sound waterfront area and represents the
most substantial development in the city's history. It
would include residential, office, retail, and industrial
buildings; and a l,OOO-slip marina. The full range of envi-
ronmental analyses were undertaken for this complex
project: land use and community resources (including
displacement and relocation), historical resources, eco-
nomic and fiscal conditions, traffic and transportation, air
quality, water resources, noise, infrastructure, and munic-
ipal services.
Town of Cortlandt, New York, Master Plan,
Cortlandt, N.Y.
In June 1991, Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. complet-
ed a new Master Plan prepared for and in conjunction
with the Town of Cortlandt in Westchester County. The
first phase of the Master Plan project involved the prepa-
ration of a Goals and Objectives Statement that highlight-
ed the critical planning concerns identified by the Town.
Focusing on these identified areas of concern, a Base
Studies report was prepared that provided a community
profile, a services and infrastructure assessment, and an
environmental setting assessment. Policy recommenda-
tions were developed by analyzing issues identified in the
base studies in concert with the Town's goals and objec-
tives. The next phase was the preparation of a Draft
Master Plan. The plan included n~arly 120 policy recom-
mendations, as well as open space, land use, and circula-
tion plans and a detailed strategy for implementation.
Final public review and the preparation of a Generic EIS
to satisfy SEQRA requirements were also completed. The
Town Board of the Town of Cortlandt approved the
Master Plan, with minor modifications, in January 1992.
Town of Cortlandt, Zoning Ordinance Revision
GElS, Cortlandt, N.Y.
The firm has been retained to prepare the GElS in support
of the new Town of Cortlandt Zoning Ordinance.
Implementation of a comprehensive revision to the ordi-
nance was a key component of the recently completed
Town Master Plan (also prepared by the firm). The GElS
will com pare the proposed and existing ordinances and
highlight the changes and new features associated with
IV-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References
.
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan Proposal
the revised ordinance. The GEIS will examine the poten-
tial impacts on land use, community character, natural
resources. and cumulative and growth-inducing aspects
of the proposed zoning ordinance.
US Truck Body Plant, Jamaica Bay, N.Y.
With the assistance ofNYCEDC. this project is a proposed
expansion of an industrial manufacturing complex on
two city-owned parcels adjacent to Barbados Basin on
Jamaica Bay in Rockaway, Queens. Of particular impor-
tance are an analysis of effects on breeding areas for birds
and other wildlife; the probable loss of a roost site for a
small number of black-crowned night herons, a colonial
water bird known to nest at two locations in Jamaica Bay;
the loss of upland foraging habitat; and impacts on adja-
cent tidal wetlands. Mitigation measures to lessen these
impacts were proposed. The project's effects on coastal
zone management, storm water runoff. land use and zon-
ing, community resources, visual quality, historic and
archaeological resources, social and economic conditions,
traffic and transportation, air quality, noise, infrastruc-
ture, and hazardous materials are also analyzed.
[!l!I Resumes
Resumes for Philip C. Sears, Robert M. White, Arnold F.
Fleming, and William Reynolds follow directly after page
IV-5 of this section of the proposal.
Ell References
Mr. John J. Huston
Real Estate Project Director
Colgate-Palmolive Company
300 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022-7499
212-310-3030
Ms. Lisa Liqouri, Director
Town of East Hampton Planning Department
300 Pontigo Place
Town of East Hampton, New York 11937
516-324-2178
Mr. Allan Marchisotto
Moran Towing
2 Greenwich Plaza
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
203-625-7846
IV-S
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
PHIl .W C. SEARS is a vice president of the frrm with more than 19 years of experience in analyzing
the impacts of projects around the world. He is the frrm's technical director in charge of all its waterfront
analyses. He has supervised surveys, studies, and designs involving water quality, coastal erosion and
sedimentation, aquatic biology, wetlands, and terrestrial ecology. In addition, Mr. Sears has prepared
and coordinated applications for Corps of Engineers and state resource agency permits for various
waterfront projects.
Mr. Sears' responsibilities include project management, supervision of technical staff, and task leadership
for waterfront, water quality, natural resources, infrastructure, and contaminated materials analyses.
Among his recent projects are:
· Montauk, East Hampton, N. Y. -Calculated the erosion rate, including the effects of sea level
rise, on the Fort Pond Bay shoreline.
· Seguine Point, Staten Island-Project manager, overseeing the preparation of a report evaluating
shoreline erosion for a Coastal Erosion Area Hazards permit, as well as preparation of SPDES,
freshwater wetlands, and tidal wetlands permits.
· US Truck Body, Jamaica Bay, N.Y.-Analyzed the effects of development on tidal wetlands
fringing the site, evaluated the effects of storm water discharge from the site into the bay, and
assessed the visual impacts of the project.
· Great Kills Harbor, Staten Island-Prepared New York State Tidal Wetlands permit applications
for the expansion of an existing Spartina marsh, construction and rehabilitation of a marina,
and installation of a boardwalk along the shoreline.
· Port of New York and New Jersey-Project manager for maritime support services location
study. Tasks involved defining maritime support services, determining the size and future needs
of the industries, finding potential locations in the port for them, and formulating policies to
help retain these industries.
· Queens West Development Project, Queens-Analyzed the consistency of the project with the
Waterfront Revitalization Program and the effects of development on the shoreline.
Before joining the firm, Mr. Sears directed a wide variety of water resources and waterfront-related
projects, including:
· Babylon, Long Island-Calculated erosion rate for the Cedar/Gilgo beaches and designed
protective measures for the sewer line under the beach.
· Long Island-Supervised inspection, design, and construction support of the rehabilitation of
the boardwalk at Jones Beach as well as four fishing piers and a barge mooring pier.
· New York Harbor-Supervised and conducted a detailed inspection of over 300 waterfront
facilities in four locations, developed removal or repair plans for each facility, analyzed environ-
mental impact of the plans, and developed cost estitnates for each facility.
· Massachusetts-Developed detailed plans for removal of PCB-laden sediments from the
Housatonic River, including river diversion for dry removal, underwater removal, and river
training works, and analyzed the environmental impact of the removal methods.
t2l94 res
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
· New York Harbor-Surveyed New York Harbor for sources for drift material and debris,
developed plans for the removal and disposal of derelicts and piers, prepared the New York
Harbor Drift Removal Program, and conducted an in-depth management review of the present
methods of debris collection and disposal.
Education
Marietta College, B.S., Geology, 1968; Old Dominion University, M.S., Oceanography, 1973.
Pnblications and Presentations
"Holocene Evolution of the Shelf Surface, Central and Southern Atlantic Shelf of North America" (with
D.J.P. Swift, J.W. Kofoed, F.P. Saulsbury), Shelf Sediment Transport: Process and Pattern,
Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pa., 1972.
"Estuarine and littoral depositional patterns in the surficial sand sheet, central and southern Atlantic
Shelf of North America" (with D.J.P. Swift) in International Symposium on Inter-relationships of
Estuarine and Continental Shelf Sedimentation, Bordeaux, Memoir 7, lnstitut de Georgie du Bassin
d' Aquitaine.
"Distribution and Genesis of Virginia-North Carolina Inner Shelf Sands" (with D.J.P. Swift, G.L.
Shideler, B.W. Holliday and J.F. McHone), U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Center
Technical Memo, 1974.
"Evolution of a Shoal Retreat Massif, North Carolina Shelf: Inferences from Areal Geology" (with
DJ.P. Swift, B. Bahlke, R. Hunt), Marine Geology, 1978.
"Design of a Small Craft Harbour" (with R.A. EI Kawafi), Coastal Structures 79, American Society
of Civil Engineers, 1979.
"Renovation of New York Harbor" (with T. Civetta), Coastal Zone Management 80, American Society
of Civil Engineers, 1980.
"Reuse of the Brooklyn Waterfront" (with T. Costanza), Coastal Zone 85, American Society of Civil
Engineers, 1985.
"Defining and Analyzing the Maritime Support Service Industries" (with K. Beasley, E. Hanhardt),
Coastal Zone 91, American Society of Civil Engineers.
Membership in Professional {)rg;In;'7>Ifions
American Society of Civil Engineers
Years of Experience
With Allee King Rosen & Fleming: 6. With other firms: 14.
t2l94 res
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
ROBERT M. W Hl'l'K, AlCP, PP, is an environmental planner experienced in waterfront planning,
environmental permitting, ecological studies, and zoning and master planning. In his more than 12
years of experience, he has been involved in projects throughout the New York metropolitan region,
specifically in the five boroughs of New York City, northern and central New Jersey, and eastern Long
Island.
Since joining Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Mr. White has served as a manager for the following major
projects :
· Culloden Point Subdivision, Town of East Hampton, NY. Mr. White led the preparation of
an environmental impac(statement for this proposed 62-unit subdivision. With some 1. 3 miles
of coastline (much of which is bluffs) along Fort Pond Bay and Block Island Sound, erosion
along the shoreline and potential impacts on the stability of the bluffs was a major issue. To
assess trends over'time, U.S. coastal maps dating back to 1838 were reviewed, wave action
analyses were periorIDed, photographic records before and after major coastal storms were
recorded, an evaluation of aerial photographs from 1955 and 1992 were undertaken, and historical
topographic maps of the site were compared. These analyses resulted in establishing appropriate
setbacks for structures from the bluffs and implementing vegetation preservation easements.
Other issues were the preservation of wetlands, potential impacts on archaeological features
(both historic and prehistoric), protection of historic resources, protection of vegetation and
rare and endangered species, preservation of views from the water and natural topographic
features, and traffic and transportation.
· Colgate-Palmolive Company-450-Slip Marina Design, Jersey City, NJ. The principal issue
raised with this project was how to design a marina that could attenuate waves from winds and
boat traffic at this exposed location while meeting the regulatory requirements of the State of
New Jersey. Wave studies showed that the largest impacts were occurring from boat traffic
associated with ferry travel to the Statue of Liberty. A system was ultimately developed that
adequately attenuated the wave wakes while meeting the state environmental regulatory standards.
Other issues were public access and compatibility with the waterfront promenade at the water's
edge, the presence of dilapidated underwater piers, riparian issues, the dredging and disposal
of 40,000 cubic yards of sediment, potential view impacts on the Statue of Liberty from a nearby
public park, and the availability of maritime support services as well as pump-out facilities and
amenities for transient boaters. Mr. White worked with the project designers and the state to
ensure that certain amenities were provided and design changes were made that led to the issuance
of a waterfront development permit for the project in September 1990.
· Colgate-Palmolive Army Corps ofEngineers Permits, Jersey City, NJ. Mr. White led a project
team through the federal regulatory process to obtain permits for the Colgate-Palmolive interim
use project. This interim project included a mooring field for 104 craft as well as a boathouse,
pier rehabilitation, repair and replacement of about 1, 100 feet of bulkhead, a ferry, and the
in-water construction of a manifold to collect and abate combined overflow discharges to the
Hudson River. Issues addressed were the safety of mooring boats at this location, public access
to the redeveloped pier, and the ecological and water quality impacts of fIlling the river to
construct the proposed manifold. Under Mr. White's direction, an extensive alternatives analysis
was developed that disclosed no practicable alternative for the routing of the proposed manifold.
The analysis also revealed the manifold's impact on water quality would be beneficial, not
harmful. Working with the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency,
the National Marine Fisheries Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, these issues were
resolved. Federal permits for the project (Sections 10 and 404) were issued in June 1994.
It/94 res
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
· East River Landing, New York, NY. Mr. White was the Assistant Project Manager in preparing
baseline studies for this waterfront project proposed for development on piers off lower Manhat-
tan. Environmental and planning data were gathered on water quality and ecology, public views
and access, maritime activity, and the adequacy of the waterfront infrastructure and bulkhead.
Before joining the firm, Mr. White's experience included:
· Senior environmental planner with the Monmouth County (N.J.) Planning Board. Mr. White
was specifically responsible for reviewing coastal development projects in the county. Many
of these projects displaced existing maritime facilities, while other provided marina slips but
no upland support facilities. Mr. White worked with the state in evaluating these changes and
trends over time, and the potential effect on the recreational boating industry. Other issues were
the potential for impacts on water quality and aquatic ecology, and the compatibility of projects
with local zoning and master planning, and the county's Growth Management Plan, which
contained specific policies related to coastal development and the preservation of the county's
maritime industry.
· Senior planner with the RBA Group, a planning and engineering firm based in Morristown,
N.J., and New York City. While with RBA, Mr. White's experience included site selection
and environmental and development feasibility services for the U.S. Postal Service's relocation
of 13 facilities throughout the New York and New Jersey area, and a relocation feasibility study
for a 150,OOO-square-foot carrier station currently located inmidtown Manhattan; an environmen-
tal assessment and development feasibility study of a 14-acre trucking facility in North Bergen,
N.J., proposed for acquisition by New Jersey Transit Bus Operation, Inc.; an environmental
assessment for an office complex proposed for a 4OO-acre undeveloped site in Readington Town-
ship, N.J.; the preparation of an EIS for a proposed widening of a 7-mile stretch of the Garden
State Parkway, concentrating on the socioeconomic, water, and coastal resources analyses; site
development feasibility studies for the Marriott Corporation's Courtyard Hotel projects proposed
for the New York metropolitan region; and street design improvement reports for the City of
New York, including 14th Street in Manhattan.
Other prior experience includes assistance in preparing the EIS for Newport City, a 300-acre mixed-use
waterfront development in Jersey City, N.J.; siting analyses for the disposal of resource recovery residu-
als; and flood damage assessments for the Army Corps of Engineers. Mr. White also assisted in the
preparation of two master planning studies and zoning recommendations for rural towns in western New
Jersey. In addition, he has participated in a variety of zoning compatibility and variance application
reviews and analyses.
Education
Rutgers University, B.A., Urban Studies/City Planning, 1982.
New York University, Certificate in Business Management Practices, 1993.
Professional Registration
American Institute of Certified Planners
Professional Planner, New Jersey
Years of Experience
With Allee King Rosen & Fleming: 7'12. With other firms: 5.
11/94 res
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
ARNOLD F. FLEMING, P.E., is principal and senior vice president of Allee King Rosen & Fleming,
Inc. and has been a professional engineer for more than 20 years. He has developed a panicular expertise
in the environmental analyses of water quality issues. Some of Mr. Fleming's projects include:
· Captain's Quarters Residential Development-Obtained permits from the Army Corps of Engi-
neers pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act for this 2OO-unit town house development in Staten Island.
· Port Regalle-Obtained Section 10 and 404 permits from the Army Corps and permits from
the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation pursuant to the Tidal Wetland
Act and Protection of Waters Act for this 350-plus-unit residential condominium and marina
in Great Kills Harbor in Staten Island.
· HarborPointe-Preparing an application to the Army Corps for permits pursuant to Section 10
and Section 404 for this large waterfront development project in Bridgeport, Connecticut to
allow for the development of a marina which requires dredging, fill, and bulkheading.
· ShorehavenEstates- Preparing shoreline stabilization and tidal wetland permits for D EC approval
in connection with this large residential project on the waterfront in the Bronx. The project
is located adjacent to a wetland and is also in a flood plain.
· Prince's Bay-Prepared a tidal wetland permit for D EC approval for this 3, OOO-unit condominium
development located on a peninsula in the Raritan Bay in Staten Island. Mr. Fleming is also
principal-in-charge for the EIS for the project.
· Battery Park City-Obtained SPDES permit for a 30,OOO-gpm discharge of the commercial center
of the 92-acre mixed-use development project. Special attention was paid to the unusual cooling
requirements of the center's computer system.
Previously, Mr. Fleming was a Professional Associate and senior project manager for Parsons
Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. He was responsible for providing technical expertise and direction
for all of the firm's environmental water pollution-related projects. His responsibilities included permit
manager for a Strategic Petroleum Reserve site in Texas, including design direction for contaminated
drainage h"nclling; project engineer for a study of utilizing industrial waste for irrigation of highway
landscaping, including analyses of soil-vegetative impacts and their effects on maintenance costs; director
of environmental studies for liqnid waste disposal for a proposed large petrochemical complex in Rio
Grande do Sol, Brazil; and project manager for the upgrading of the world's largest sanitary landfill
(Fresh Kills) to obtain state and federal operating permits, including design assistance for transportation
improvements to minimize neighborhood impacts associated with current and project truck delivery
of solid waste. Mr. Fleming was also project manager for water quality impacts of Westway on the
Hudson River and surrounding New York Harbor area waters, and for the design of an industrial park
in Pennsylvania, including roads and an environmental management system to control pollutant discharges
both during construction and operation.
Education
Manhattan College, B.S.C.E., 1968; Master of Sanitary Engineering, 1969.
Publications
"The Environmentallmpact ofPL 92-500 on the Hudson River Estuary," A. Fleming, et aI., Proceedings
of the Founh Hudson River Environmental Society Symposium, 1976.
11/93 res
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
'.
COASTAL PROJECTS
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
Statement of Qualifications
to Provide
Coastal Engineering
Services
Table of Contents
A - Introduction to the Firm
B - Environmental Planning and Assessment
C - Representative Projects
D - Water Quality Modeling
E - Key Personnel
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers
250 West Wardlow Road
Long Beach, CA 90807
(310) 426-9551
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers
3717 National Drive
Raleigh, NC 27612
(919) 781-4626
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers
2809 Boston Street, Suite 6
Baltimore, MD 21224
(410) 563-7300
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers
131 Stewart Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 227-4080
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
"River Dynamics and Power Plants," presented at the Hudson River Environmental Society Conference
on Land and Water: Resolving Development Conflicts Along the Hudson, May 1978.
"Upgrading the World's Largest Landfill," A.F. Fleming, Clearwater.
11/93 res
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
COMPANY mSTORY & BACKGROUND
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS
INTRODUCTION TO THE FIRM
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is a multi-disciplinary engineering and planning firm providing a full range
of services from conceptual planning to construction support, including engineering design, for a wide
array of infrastructure facilities for public and private clients. Moffatt & Nichol Engineers is recognized
for providing quality engineering solutions in the areas of transportation and public works engineering.
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers' highway engineering expertise enables us to provide comprehensive
planning and design services for complex urban transportation problems. We provide complete roadway
design services for projects ranging from local street improvements to major interchanges and freeways,
including high occupancy vehicle (HO) facilities.
Structural capabilities at Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers encompass a range of services from inspection of
final design for bridges and grade separations. The firm has prepared construction documents for more
than 400 highway bridges and railroad grade separation structures. These projects have included both
fixed and moveable spans, some in excess of 50 feet, and have incorporated all types of concrete and steel
superstructures in their design. national recognition has been achieved in the form of awards for several
of Moffatt & Nichol's major bridge design projects.
Many of the projects designed by Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers require traffic engineering capabilities.
This includes traffic signals and safety lighting, signing and striping, construction staging and traffic
maintenance during construction, traffic operational analyses and traffic studies.
Rail and transit capabilities at Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers includes experience in track and structural
design for both light and heavy rail applications. Projects have included rapid transit facilities and
industrial rail projects including internodal freight facilities, switching and marshalling yards, and
industrial sidings.
The professional design staff at Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers consists of over 50 licensed civil engineers,
20 licensed structural engineers, and 1 licensed traffic engineer, may of whom have more than 25 years
of experience in the design of transportation facilities. These engineers are licensed in Florida, California
and/or North Carolina. The group of registered professionals leads a total transportation design group
of more than 90 individuals.
Moffatt &Nichol, Engineers have proven success on state and local highway and bridge projects, including
projects that required multi-agency participation and coordination, accelerated design schedules, and
budget constraints.
The main office of Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers is located in Long Beach, California with fully staffed
branches in Santa Ana, Walnut Creek, San Francisco, Sacramento, Ventura, San Diego, California;
Raleigh, North Carolina; Baltimore, Maryland; Virginia Beach, Virginia and Tampa, Florida.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR COASTAL PROJECTS
PLANNING
Conceptual Studies and Estimates
Master Planning
Environmental Assessments
Permits
Shore Protection
Dredging and Disposal Planning
Flood Protection Studies
Facility Condition Surveys
CRITERIA, STUDIES AND SPECIFICATIONS
Criteria and Design Manuals
Technical Studies and Reports
Equipment Performance Specifications
Operational and Systems Evaluations
Shoreline Evolution Modeling
FACILITY DESIGN, MODERNIZATION AND REPAIRS
Shore Protection Systems
Basin and Channel Dredging and Material Disposal
Storm Drainage Management
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Construction Estimating
Construction Documentation
Bid Evaluations and Contractor Selection
Construction Inspection and Consultation
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
HISTORICAL PROJECT SUMMARY
Since 1945, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers has been responsible for the following:
~ More than 20 miles of breakwaters
~ More than 20 miles of piers and wharves
~ More than 80 miles of bulkheads
~ More than 100,000 marina slips
~ More than 200 million cubic yards of dredging
~ More than 400 bridges
~ More than 2,500 acres of wetlands
~ 10 federal design manuals (US Navy and Army Corps of Engineers)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE COASTAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS
North Shore of Long Island, Reconnaissance Study
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers, New York District
An ongoing reconnaissance level study aiming to provide storm damage protection and beach
erosion control reco=endations for study area ranging from the East River, Queens County, to
Orient Point, Suffolk County. Development of improvement alternatives for two co=unities,
Bayville, Nassau County, and Asharoken, Suffolk County, will be completed. For the
remainder of the shoreline reach, pertinent data will be evaluated to allow a screening of the
co=unities to identify problem areas, and to complete an assessment of conceptual engineering
solutions. M&N reco=endations for these remaining areas will be evaluated by the Corps to
determine locations that should proceed to a pre-feasibility study or requiring no further action.
Additionally, an evaluation of existing coastal structures in the study area, including their past
effectiveness, will be prepared.
Breach Contingency Plan, Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, Long Island, New York
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers, New York District
M&N completed a study of the southern Long Island barrier shoreline to establish plans to react
and respond to barrier island breaches, which may occur prior to the completion of long-term
improvement plans. Tasks included the evaluation of barrier island breaching potential and
breach impacts on bay hydrodynamics and storm-induced damages; design of an emergency
breach closure cross-section; borrow source identification and preparation of a decision matrix
regarding their use; analysis of cost differences based on different closure construction methods
and time of breach closure operations; and determination of the most cost-effective method of
breach closure. These pre-breach evaluations of engineering and cost parameters will allow
emergency breach closure to proceed in an expeditious, environmentally sound, and cost-
effective manner.
Section 14, Shoreline Erosion and Protection Report, Rikers Island, NY
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers, New York District
Prepared a study examining shore protection/storm damage prevention alternatives available to
curtail shoreline recession threatening facilities on Rikers Island. For without- and with-project
conditions, M&N evaluated coastal processes to determine shoreline erosion rates, tidal current
and surge effects, wave height-frequency of occurrence relationships, wave runup and losses for
storms with various recurrence intervals. For with-project alternatives, M&N designed three
shore protection alternatives. Finalized layouts, cross-sections and provided detailed quantity
and cost estimates for chosen alternative.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
MOFFAIT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE COASTAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS (Continued)
Westhampton Beach Storm Damage Protection Interim Plan, Long Island, NY
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers, New York District
M&N completed a detailed planning study for interim shore protection along Westhampton Beach.
Project involved attempt to reduce shoreline recession, storm damages and the risk of island
breaching by improving the shoreline using a combination of existing groin modification, beachfIlI
placement, and new groin construction. Included topographic mapping, coastal studies and
economic analysis of various improvement alternatives. For without- and with-project conditions,
M&N completed coastal studies which included detailed numerical modeling of waves, water levels
and shoreline processes including storm-induced dune and shoreline erosion, development of
sediment budgets, design of beach nourishment using dredge sand, design of groin field-beachfIlI
transition schemes, detailed cost estimates for project elements, and preparation of monitoring plans.
Shoreline Preservation Study, San Diego, CA
Client: San Diego Association of Governments
This is an ongoing M&N project to develop a comprehensive plan to manage the San Diego County
shoreline for both recreation and property protection. The technical database is the US Army Corps
of Engineer's Coast of California Study. One strategic goal is to provide for a coordinated, long-
range program of beachfilling and beach maintenance. The study is also evaluating structural and
mechanical methods to reduce sand losses and to redistribute sand along the shoreline. Regulation
of coastal land use, inland development (effect on sand delivery to the coast), and property
protection measures such as seawalls, revetments and artificial dunes are also components of the
strategy.
Shore Protection Project, Atlantic Coast of New York City, Brooklyn, NY
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers, New York District
M&N provided engineering and economic reevaluation of beach fill project. Included field damage
surveys, estimation of long-term erosion rates from historic shoreline positions and aerial photos,
and calculation of shoreline retreat due to storms using EBEACH and DUNE (numerical) models.
Performed economic analysis of beach fIll alternatives using USACE's Principles and Guidelines.
Subsequently prepared General Design Memorandum for a 2.28 million cubic yard beach
nourishment project. Work included determining shoreline retreat rates, offshore borrow area
studies, including sediment budgets, seismic profiling and vibracoring, sand compatibility analyses,
and evaluation of beach fIll, as well as other structural/non-structural alternatives, underwater
archaeological investigation of borrow area, cost estimates, damage surveys, economic analyses,
contingent valuation (CVM) estimates of recreational benefits, and final report preparation.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
REPRESE~T'fATIVE COASTAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS (Continued)
Wallops Island Shore Protection Study, Wallops Island, VA
Client: NASA
M&N developed and evaluated design and construction concepts and alternatives for shoreline
protection of the Goddard Space Flight Center. Evaluated several available alternatives, including
armor stone and concrete block revetments, artificial headlands, and beach sill modules. Described
their advantages/disadvantages, and estimated costs and environmental impacts. Monitored
effectiveness of the demonstration project in providing shore protection and retaining sand. Field
data collected included quarterly beach profiles, weekly readings of several pipe ranges established
at each installation, periodic aerial photographs, repetitive ground level photographs from established
vantage points and continuous hourly wind records, which were used to hindcast wave conditions
due to local winds. Hindcasted maximum monthly wave heights from a years' worth of hourly wind
records.
Low-Cost Shore Protection Demonstration Program, Various Sites, Nationwide
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers
M&N performed field investigations at 36 sites ttationwide in the areas of Delaware Bay, the Great
Lakes, Alaska, Hawaii, and along the Pacific, Atlantic and Gulf coasts to assess the relative merits
of various low-cost shore protection devices ranging from vegetation to shoreline hardening, with
structures constructed of rock, concrete, steel and timber. The five major categories of shore
protection systems investigated were bulkheads and seawalls, revetments, breakwaters and sills,
groins, and vegetation. Construction tttaterials included fIlter cloth, rubble, concrete blocks,
gabions, steel fuel barrels, longard tubes, quarrystone, asphalt mastic, marsh and dune grasses,
mangroves, and other species of wetland and aquatic vegetation. Data collected included wind,
waves and currents, bathymetric surveys, aerial photographs, and sediment samples. Data were
analyzed on the basis of stability, effectiveness, maintettance requirements and cost. Results were
input to the USACE's Final Report on the Erosion Control Demonstration Program (Section 54),
published in 1981. The project culmittated in a 794-page report to Congress. Since the Final
Report's completion, no maintenance of the demonstration projects was accomplished at the 16 sites
constructed by the USACE. A "revisit" to those sites was made to inspect the low-cost shoreline
erosion control devices to learn how the devices had withstood the environmental conditions of those
sites after 10 years. Results of this revisit were documented in the USACE's Shoreline Erosion
Control Demonstration Program -Revisited, published in 1989.
.
.
.
-
.
-
-
MOFFATI & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE COASTAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS (Continued)
-
Breakwater and Shoreline Protection, Diego Garcia, BlOT
Client: US Navy
M&N designed a breakwater to shelter Navy small boat harbor and basin perimeter slope protection.
Provided site investigation, study and designs for use of dredge fill to create sacrificial beaches at
critical areas of island shoreline, including protection of airport runway and parking apron.
Provided site investigation and evaluation of mining reef for fill material and determination of
maximum limits for reef mining operations.
.
-
Lake Worth Inlet Beach Erosion Study, Lake Worth Inlet, FL
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers
-
-
.
-
Completed a study of the effect of the Lake Worth Inlet channel and jetties on the adjacent
shoreline. Historical records and available hydrographic survey data were assessed, a wave-energy
analysis of local wave climate was conducted, and the hydraulics on the inlet were numerically
modelled. Shoreline evolution was compared with fillet-growth and downdrift-erosion theory at a
littoral barrier, and a time-phased accounting of the sand budget at the inlet was presented.
-
.
Guidelines to Evaluate Seacliff Protective Devices, Laguna Beach, CA
Client: City of Laguna Beach
Over the years, 106 seawalls, bulkheads and foundation walls were constructed to protect property
atop or on the seacliffs at Laguna Beach. Some of these devices were poorly conceived and failed
to adequately consider the complex dynamics of their environment. After examining the often
conflicting desire of the public to protect, preserve and possibly restore sandy beaches for
recreation, and the desire by the private sector to protect its shorefront property, the City
commissioned M&N to develop a study to obtain a more thorough understanding of local shoreline
characteristics. Using the results of this first phase of the study, M&N applied that understanding
towards the development of a comprehensive beach management plan. The methodology used to
evaluate alternatives for the protection of seacliffs from wave attack, while preserving the sandy
beaches, was the most important aspect of the plan.
The study showed that, in this case, in most locations a seawall or revetment will have little affect
on beach width if it passes a four-part test. The main elements of this test include a comparison of
the effect the seawall or revetment will have on beach width versus the effect of the unprotected
seacliff on the beach. Thus, the comparison was used to ensure negative effects that would occur
as a result of a proposed seawall or revetment did not exceed negative effects already occurring as
a result of wave interaction with the seacliffs.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE COASTAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS (Continued)
Sand Management Guidelines, Newport Beach, CA
Client: City of Newport Beach
M&N prepared a set of sand management guidelines and strategies. Within the context of the study
and the approach, sand management is the act of controlling the littoral sediment resource to the
extent possible to benefit the recreational and protective functions of the beach. The resulting
strategy required that changes in shoreline position and beach width be anticipated before they occur
so that decisions could be made and cost-effective methods implemented to deal with future
undesirable shoreline behavior. In this case, the key to having effective and economical sand
resource management was to have a plan that anticipated the changes. Without the plan, options
for dealing with beach problem were limited, more costly and, in some cases, resulted in the
permanent loss of beach.
'.
Sedimentation Study, Parris Island, SC
Client: Marine Corps
M&N examined the tidal flow conditions through Ballast Creek to determine if changing the flow
pattern by closing an auxiliary channel would increase the flushing action through the main channel
and reduce a severe silting problem, which required frequent channel dredging. Project included
site investigations; field data collection and numerical modeling of existing and future tidal flow
conditions, auxiliary channel closure alternatives, marina relocation and vertical closure of auxiliary
channel with various dredge disposal alternatives; economic analyses of continued maintenance
dredging versus vertical closure with various dredge disposal alternatives; and preparation of plans,
specifications and estimates. Project also included determinations of tidal prism, velocities at
various stages during the tidal cycle, the most feasible engineering alternative and the most feasible
economic alternative.
Marina Design and Protection Breakwater System, Pensacola, FL
Client: City of Pensacola, FL
M&N conducted a feasibility study to determine the most effective means of providing a sheltered
marina basin at the proposed project location. This study evaluated marina basin layouts and
protective breakwater structural systems for the proposed marina complex. Study results identified
the most effective structural breakwater alternative, and the general basin size and configuration that
would optimize marina development investment. Project included developing site wind and wave
climate (involving analysis of 80 years of hourly data), drogue study of existing basin circulation
characteristics, developing design criteria, breakwater design analysis (rubblemound versus wave
baffle), water quality analysis for each alternative, and cost estimates.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE COASTAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS (Continued)
Mission Bay Littoral Study, San Diego, CA
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers
Performed a sediment budget study of Mission Bay cell as part of the Coast of California Storm and
Tidal Waves Study. Results of the study used to assess future regional scale shoreline changes due
to the natural forces, such as storms, and to man-made modifications to the shoreline, such as
harbors and groin fields. The study provides a set of baseline conditions for the Mission Bay
Littoral zone on which future engineering and planning efforts and decisions will be based.
Lakeview Park Cooperative Beach Erosion Control Project, Lorain, OR
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District
Designed beach fJJ.I protected by a series of three segmented offshore breakwaters. The beach at
Lakeview Park gradually disappeared after adjacent harbor structures interrupted longshore sediment
transport and, consequently, the beach's natural resupply of sand. M&N was retained to analyze
the problem and to compare potential erosion control solutions. Alternative solutions were evaluated
based on first costs, annual costs, benefits, environmental impact, public interest, and opinions of
federal and non-federal agencies. M&N prepared the Phase II General Design Memorandum
(GDM) which led to the implementation of a Cooperative Beach Erosion Project between the Buffalo
District and the City of Lorain. The selected design, presented in the GDM, consisted of a beach
fill protected by three detached rubble-mound breakwaters and kept in place by two existing groins
which were rehabilitated. A primary consideration in project design was prevention of tombolo
formation behind the breakwaters which would interrupt littoral drift and prevent longshore sediment
transport to adjacent beaches. A two-year post-construction monitoring program found a net project
gain of 5,000 cubic yards of material, with the eastern and central breakwaters trapping sand while
the western breakwater lost material.
Silver Strand Littoral Cell Study, San Diego, CA
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers
Completed a study of the Silver Strand littoral cell as part of the Coast of California Storm and
Tidal Wave Study. The study identified the quantity and affect of all major components in the
sediment budget, and outlined a series of fmdings and recommendations to further the understanding
of the area and to help in future planning decisions.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE COASTAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS (Continued)
San Diego Region Historic Wave and Sea Level Data Report, Southern California
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers
Prepared a report on the historic wave data an sea level data available in the San Diego Region as
part of the Coast of California Storm and Tidal Wave Study. The project included compiling wave
data from existing databases, historic and predicted sea level data, and a chronology of extreme
storm events, and conducting an extreme event analysis for the wave and sea level data.
Sand Spit Breakwater Extension at Santa Barbara Harbor, Santa Barbara, CA
Client: City of Santa Barbara
Prepared a report to assess the feasibility of extending the sand spit breakwater to prevent waves
from entering the harbor. Preliminary engineering analyses included investigation of breakwater
extension configurations, alignments and structure types; wave refraction analysis for the breakwater
configurations; assessment of navigation channel alignment; and discussion of construction methods
and costs.
Feasibility of a City-Operated Dredging Program for Santa Barbara Harbor,
Santa Barbara, CA
Client: City of Santa Barbara
Determined the feasibility of the City owning and operating a dredge or sand bypass system to better
maintain the navigation channel and mooring area in Santa Barbara Harbor. The feasibility study
included establishing dredge selection criteria based on historical dredging practice, shoaling patters,
sediment type, disposal areas, and permitting restrictions and requirements. The type and size of
dredge appropriate for Santa Barbara Harbor were identified in the study, as were the benefits and
costs of a city-owned dredge.
Buhne Point Shoreline Erosion Demonstration Project, Humbolt Bay, CA
Client: US Army Corps of Engineers
Project involved the design, construction and monitoring of a shore protection project designed to
protect the community of King Salmon. Project features included a 23-acre sandf1ll, a groin and
a breakwater. M&N analyzed the monitoring data and prepared a report describing the performance
of the project, an operational and maintenance manual, and the final project report. Coastal
engineering analyses include the review of aerial photographs, dredging records and beach profile
data.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
REPRESENTATIVE COASTAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS (Continued)
National Coastal Erosion Study, Malaysia
Client: Government of Malaysia
Performed coastal processes investigation and quantification of beach erosion problems and solutions
along the entire coast of Malaysia. The study was conducted in two phases. Phase I involved an
assessment of coastal erosion along the 4,OOO-kilometer shoreline. Phase II included a series of
detailed feasibility studies on selected sites to mitigate coastal erosion. Sedimentation rates in rivers,
and sediment transport and deposition pattern at river entrances was a part of the study.
Hydrographic surveys and wave climatic analysis were also conducted. M&N also completed
detailed plans and specifications for coastal protection works at four severely eroded sites.
Impacts of Illinois Beach State Park Marina on Littoral Processes,
IDinois Beach State Park, II.,
Client: Epstein Civil Engineering
Prepared a report to address the potential impacts of a marina on the littoral processes at and
adjacent to the project site. Ranges of littoral transport rates were defmed using previous studies.
Potential erosions and accretions upcoast and downcoast of the marina were then determined using
an implicit numerical model. Calibration of the model was done using historic shoreline data.
Model input consisted of longshore sediment transport rates at each computational cell, boundary
conditions, initial shoreline positions, depth of profile change and magnitude of offshore losses.
Longshore transport rates were obtained from energy flux calculations using deep water wave
hindcasts.
The results of the shoreline evolution model were used to discuss potential impacts upcoast and
downcoast of the marina. Mitigation measures, including sand bypassing alternatives and structural
alternatives, were discussed.
Wye Island Shoreline Erosion Control, Queen Anne's County, MD
Client: Maryland East Shore Resources Conservation
M&N prepared the design, plans and specifications for a non-structural shoreline erosion control
project at Wye Island. The project involved the use of sand fill, stone groins, and wetland grass
plantings of smooth and saltmeadow cordgrass.
,
I
I
I
I~
I
I
I
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
.
.
EXPERIMENTAL SAND BYPASS SYSTEM
Location:
Client:
Services Provided:
Oceanside, California
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District
MoHalt & Nichol, Engineers designed a major experimental project to test the use of jet
pumps and fluidizers for maintenance dredging of channels. In addition to jet pumps, the
project inciuded developing projects to test engines, slurry pumps, electrical power
generation, climate control and many other auxiliary systems located on a lift-barge. All
were controlled and monitored centrally by a SCADA system. Two diesel engine driven
pumps were utilized in the system, and a 16-inch slurry pipeline carried dredged material
from either of two areas up to 10,000 feet down-coast. An auxiliary electrical snore booster
pump station was also designed to be compatible with a recreation environment. Project
documentation and equipment data were also assembled and catalogued for this project,
together with an Operation and Maintenance Manual which gives stepwise instructions for
operation of the system.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
I
I
.
.
I SANTA BARBARA HARBOR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Location:
Client:
Services Provided:
Santa Barbara, California
City of Santa Barbara and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District
Moffatt & Nlcnol, Engineers has been a major participant in the development of Santa
Barbara Harbor and Its waterfront. The City of Santa Barbara has entrusted the protection
of Its harbor facilities to Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers' expertise in shore protection and littoral
processes. Designs and documents to support construction in the area include a 250-loot
extension of the breakwater, repair and rehabilitation of West Beach groin. and repair of
storm damage to piles beneath Stearns Wharf. A two-phase study to repair marinas 3 and
4 In the harbor included an inspection, feasibility study, and design and construction for
repiacement of the floating docks and utilities. Studies of wave penetration and feasibility
of operating a City-owned dredge were prepared to improve operations and lessen
shoaling in the harbor area. For the Harbor Master Plan, technical elements in harbor
design and planning for increased parking, dry boat storage, and launching facilities were
developed.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
HERBERT C. BONNER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STUDY
Location:
Client:
Services Provided:
Oregon Inlet. North Carolina
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Moffatt & Nichol. Engineers analyzed the coastal processes and the impact ;ney would
have on replacement options for a major highway bridge over one of the largest tidal inlets
in the world. Because of the extremely dynamic coastal environment. the stc:ly had to
address such factors as inlet migration and beach erosion. Investigatlons;c describe
historic and existing coastal conditions were conducted. Future shoreline positions as well
as the future location and orientation of principal and main subsidiary channels through the
inlet were forecast for the 50-year life of the project. A shoreline evolution model was used
to project future shoreline conditions in response to a new terminal groin under ccnstruction
in the study area. The future conditions forecast also considered the possibili:y of major
jetty construction at the inlet. Various replacement crossing alternatives were evaluated
with consideration given to secure approach and abutment locations. navigation channel
requirements and anticipated scour impacts.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
NATIONAL COASTAL EROSION STUDY
location:
Client:
Services Provided:
Malaysia
Government of Malaysia
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers performed coastal processes investigations and prepared a
detailed study of beach erosion problems and solutions along the entire coast of Malaysia.
The study was conducted in two phases: Phase 1 invoived an assessment of coastal
erosion along the 4000-km shoreline; Phase 2 included a series of cetailed feasibility
studies on selected sites to mitigate coastal erosion. Sediment transport and deposition
patterns at river entrances were part of the study. Hydrograohic surveys and wave
analyses were also conducted. The firm also completed detailed plans and specifications
for coastal protection works at four severely eroded sites.
~1~~'~;f:~,~~j~t~'"'
-.- :-};
.-.;';"..~
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
I
I
.
.
I CONEY ISLAND BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Location:
Client:
Services Provided:
Brooklyn, New York
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers conducted an engineering anc economic evaluation of a major
beach fill and groin project. The firm performed coastal engineering analyses and
prepared the engineering appendices for the Project General Design Memorandum. Our
work included all coastal engineering aspects of the project. such as wave forecasts, wave
refraction studies, shoreline change rates, sediment budgets, design of 32 fill alternatives,
design of terminal groins, evaluation of structural alterna1:ves to a beach fill (headlands,
revetments and seawalls), estimates offuture shoreline pcs;tions, beach and dune erosion
modeling, long-term field measurements of tidal currents and wave ccnditions, and all
inputs to damage model including long term erosion, Stcrm recession distances, wave
attack distances and inundation levels. Other elements of the project prepared under
Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers' direction included hydrograocic surveys, aerial topographic
mapping, seismic refraction studies, vibracoring of an o~snore borrow area, underwater
archaeology, and complete economic analyses of anticipated damages and benefits.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
I
.
.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
I
COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
I
I
Project Description Comments
Coney Island General Design ,;' ,;' ,;' ,;' ,;' General Design Memorandum for Major
Memorandum Corps of Engineers Project (5.6 million
cubic yards, $62.9 million initial cost).
Review of Design for Presque Isle ,;' ,;' ,;' .I .I Major public involvement! hearing
Breakwaters, Presque Isle, PA component.
Planning and Design of Small Beach .I .I .I .I .I .I Beach renourishment and sand recirculation
Management and Sand Backpassing study for a smalllOwn which was designed
Plan, Long Beach, NC to be self-funded.
Figure Eight Island Beach .I .I Beach renourishment pennitting and
Renourishment construction monitoring.
Wallops Island Shore Protection .I .I .I Structural evaluation of several miles of
Study groins and bulkheads. One year of
monitoring and e,.aluation of low cost shore
protection devices.
Coastline of Malaysia .I ,;' .I .I .I Nationwide shoreline management plan.
Delaware Marina Regulations .I I3 public workshops and 2 formal public
hearings were pan of a major public
involvement process on a controversial
project.
Coastal Studies to Suppon .I .I Complete coastal engineering srodies
Replacement of the Bonner Bridge, including shoreline evolution for 60 years
Oregon Inlet, NC into the furore.
Coastal Srodies to Support Design .I .I .I .I Prediction of furore shoreline positions using
of Nonh Point Marina and a finite-element shoreline evolution model.
Breakwater, Winthrop Harbor, IL Develop a sand management plan for furore
maintenance.
Shoreline Preservation Strategy for - .I .I .I .I .I Comprehensive plan of San Diego County,
San Diego Association of CA for long term beach maintenance.
Governments Includes beach nourishment and evaluation of
existing structures and regulatory program.
Guideline to Evaluate Seacliff .I .I .I Development of guidelines for use and
Protective Devices, City of Laguna regulation of sea\\'ails to protect property
Beach, CA while preserving public beaches. Develop a
comprehensive beach management plan for
the City.
Sand Management Guidelines, City .I .I .I .I Prepared set of management guidelines and
of Newpon Beach, CA strategies to make maximum use of existing
sand resources.
Design of Sand Bypassing System ,;' .I .I .I Develop complete coastal processes
for Oceanside Harbor, CA description, sediment budgets, and sand
management plan which included largest jet
pump sand bypass plant in the U.S.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
A WARDS AND COMMENDA TIONS
1993 The Waterfront Center, Excellence on the W aterfront Award
Huntington Beach Pier, Huntington Beach, CA
1992 Pacific Division, NA VFAC, Certificate of Appreciation in Recognition of
Exemplary Performance
Wave Study and Mooring Analysis, Ammunition Wharf (Kilo), Guam, Mariana Islands
1991 Charleston Naval Shipyard, NA VFAC, Letter of Appreciation for a Job "Splendidly
Done"
Hurricane Repairs to Several Piers, Charleston, SC
1990 Southwest Division, NA VF AC, Letter of Appreciation for Superior Job Performance
Pier 12, Naval Station, San Diego, CA
1988 American Landscape Architects Design Award and Excellence on the Waterfront
Award, Park/Walkway/Recreational Category
Municipal Fishing Pier Plaza, Imperial Beach, CA
1988 American Shore and Beach Preservation Association Award of Recognition
Cooperative Beach Erosion Control Project, Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH
1988 City of San Clemente Letter of Commendation
Reconstruction of Municipal Pier, San Clemente, CA
1987 Northern Division, NA VFAC, Certificate of Appreciation
Capstan Repair Project, Drydocks 2, 3, 4 and 5, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, PA
1987 Southern California Ready-Mixed Concrete Association and Portland Cement
Association, Southern California, Outstanding Paving Project
Long Beach Bicycle/Pedestrian Path, Long Beach, CA
1986 City of Pismo Beach Commendation for Innovative Design
Reconstruction of Municipal Pier, Pismo Beach, CA
1985 Consulting Engineers of California Engineering Excellence Award
Shiplift and Land Level Transfer Facility, Todd Pacific Shipyard, San Pedro, CA
1982 Atlantic Division, NA VFAC, Certificate of Appreciation
Revisions to Design Manual DM 29.3, Drvdocking Facilities
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
.
.
AWARDS AND COMMENDATIONS
1981 Long Beach Naval Shipyard,.NAVFAC, Superior Accomplishment of NAVFAC
Contract
Ship Wastewater Collection Ashore, Long Beach, CA
1979 Pacific Division, NA VFAC, Letter of Commendation
Breakwater and Harbor Restoration, Guam, Mariana Islands
1978 Mare Island Naval Shipyard, NA VFAC, Letter of Commendation
Facility Certification Report, Drydock #1, Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Vallejo, CA
1975 Long Beach Naval Shipyard, NAVFAC, Letter of Commendation
Study for Industrial Waste and Ship Wastewater Collection and Disposal Facility,
Drydocks 1, 2 and 3, Long Beach Naval Shipyard
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
JOHN R. HEADLAND
Vice President
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Headland, Vice President and Branch Manager of M&N's Baltimore office, has extensive
experience in shoreline management, coastal engineering, shore protection design, and numerical
modeling/assessment of shore processes. Prior to joining M&N, he served as the US Navy's
worldwide technical consultant for harbor and coastal facilities. His service in this role was honored
in 1989, when he received NA VFAC's Engineer of the Year award. Mr. Headland currently serves
as principal-in-charge of and project management for a variety of coastal engineeering and coastal
zone management studies within the northeast U.S. and at other locations throughout the world.
RELEVANT PROJECTS
North Shore of Long Island, Reconnaissance Study
Project manager of shore protection reconnaissance level study for the New York District of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers. This study will provide recommendations for storm damage protection
and beach erosion control recommendations for the entire north shore of Long Island. Specific
projects will be considered for Bayville and Asharoken, NY.
New York District Breach Contingency Plan
Project manager for an extensive evaluation of barrier island breaching potential and subsequent
corrective actions for a fifty mile section of shoreline on the south shore of Long Island. This work
is being performed for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District.
Rikers Island Emergency ShoreIine Protection Project
Served as project manager for design of a protective revetment for the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, New York District.
Westhampton Beach, New York
Project manager for the interim shore protection project for Westhampton Beach, New York. This work,
which was performed for the New York District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, involved a coastal
planning study for the design of shore protection (beach nourishment and modification of an existing
groin field) to a critically eroding portion of Westhampton Beach.
Poplar Island, Maryland
Project Manager for the design of a 1000 acre artificial island for dredge material. The work, which
is being conducted for the Maryland Port Authority, includes a detailed coastal engineering
assessment of winds, waves, waterlevels and long-term and storm-induced shoreline changes as well
as environmental assessment and design of the complete facility. The project will recreate a badly
eroded island, will create more than 700 acres of intertidal wetlands and more than 7 miles of
protective dikes.
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
John R. Headland (cont'd)
Page 2
Low-Cost Shore Protection Report (Section 54)
Participated in preparation of a nationwide study on low-cost shore protection performance. This
project involved field investigations of shore protection systems in the areas of Delaware Bay, the
Great Lakes, Alaska, Hawaii, and along the Pacific, Atlantic and Gulf coasts. The systems
investigated were non-structural devices, bulkheads and seawalls, revetments, breakwaters and sills,
and groins, which were analyzed on the basis of stability, effectiveness, maintenance requirements
and cost. The results were published in 1981, in the USACE's "Final Report on the Erosion Control
Demonstration Program. "
Dam Neck, Virginia
Prepared a comprehensive shoreline management plan for the US Navy's Fleet Combat Training
Center at Dam Neck. The work included preparation of protective dune and dune/seawall designs.
Kings Bay, Georgia
Developed comprehensive five-year plan for monitoring shore and estuarine processes in the vicinity
of the Naval Submarine Base at Kings Bay, Georgia.
Wallops Island, Virginia
Conducted a comprehensive investigation of shore processes at NASA Wallops Island Flight Facility.
The purpose of the work was to define cause and effect between environmental site dynamics and
historical shoreline movements. Work included extensive modeling of longshore sediment transport
and dune erosion.
Figure Eight Island, North Carolina
Monitored construction of an emergency beach nourishment project.
Diego Garcia, Indian Ocean. Prepared a study of shore processes in support of an airfield extension
project. Prepared design of a protective beach fill of course dredge material. Detailed shoreline
evolution modeling was used to design the project.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Alexandria, VA.
Responsible for preparation of Navy design manuals, DM 26.1 "Harbors," DM 26.2 "Coastal
Protection, " and DM 26.3 "Coastal Sedimentation and Dredging."
REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer: California, Maryland, Virginia
EDUCATION
Doctoral Studies, Civil Engineering: Duke University
M.S., Civil Engineering: California State University
B.S., Civil Engineering: George Washington University, Graduated with Special Honors
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
FlANG JENG
CoastaIffiydraulic Engineer
EXPERIENCE
Dr. Feng Jiang is a coastal/hydraulic engineer for M&Ns Baltrmore office and has extensive
experience in coastal planning, coastal engineering, environmental engineering and numerical
modeling. His practice in coastal and hydraulic engineering has included areas located on the
Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific shorelines of the U.S as well as numerous overseas assignments. Dr.
Jiangs has recently been involved in several major coastal engineering projects located along the
shorelines of Long Island, New York.
RELEVANT PROJECTS
Westhampton Beach, New York
Carried out beach erosion modeling for Westhampton Beach. SBEACH storm-induced erosion model
was used to evaluate beach erosion with and without beach fills under storm conditions. Dr. Jiang
also prepared sediment budgets and shoreline evolution modeling for this site. This effort was a part
of coastal engineering study at Westhampton.
Moriches Bay, New York
Developed a 2-D numerical model of Moriches Bay, Long Island, NY. The work was aimed to
evaluate Moriches Bay tidal circulation patterns and impacts of erosion control plan and breading
conditions on residence time, flushing time, flow field and salinity distribution.
Fire Island Inlet and Great South Bay, Moriches Inlet and Bay, Shinnecock Inlet and Bay, New
York
Developed a method to evaluate the inlet stability of a two-inlet bay system. Applied a numerical inlet
hydrodynamic model to obtain the stage-frequency relationships for different storm return periods.
This work was a part of Interim Breach Contingency Plan, Long Island, NY.
Blind Pass, Lee County, Florida
This investigation was to examine the stability of Blind Pass in conjunction with a study to develop
options for the management of the inlet and the nearby breaches. The study efforts entailed using
analytical models based on Keulegan-type inlets to attempt to characterize the long-term stability of
Blind Pass, and a numerical model based on one-dimensional integrated momentum, flow and
sediment continuity equations to model its short -term stability.
Lake Okeechobee, Florida
Participated in a study of wave and wave-induced circulation on the lake. His specific responsibilities
included collection and statistical evaluation of wave data. This work was performed for the Water
Management District of South Florida.
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Feng Jiang (cont'd)
.
.
Page 2
Corpus Christi, Texas
Developed a one-, two- and three-dimensional finite element hydrodynamics and salinity model of
Corpus Christi Bay. This work was done to evaluate the effects of a major navigation channel
deepening and widening on the circulation and salinity structure of the Corpus Christi estuarial
system. The model will also be used on this on-going project to evaluate channel sedimentation and
long-term maintenance dredging requirements.
Belmont Center Marina
Developed a dynamic water quallty model for Belmont Center Marina. The model was successfully
used to access water quality inside the marina under tidal conditions. This water quality analysis
constitutes an important part of a Joint Permit Application (JPA) for the construction of the marina.
Mobile Bay, Alabama
A nearshore beach mound was placed at this site as part of a beneficial use of dredged material. A
detailed evaluation shoreline response in the vicinity of the mound was conducted. This work
demonstrated the wave attenuating features of the nearshore mound.
Mayport Wave Study
Applied RCPW AVE numerical model to obtain individual wave transformation at Mayport, Florida.
A methodology was developed to transform directional wave spectra from offshore deep water to
Mayport entrance channel. The transformed directional wave spectra have been used for navigation
risk analysis in Mayport channel by Naval Surface Warfare Center.
Pier 400 Mooring Analyses
Prepared a detailed dynamic analysis of container vessels exposed to long waves (Le. seiche) in Los
Angeles Harbor. The work involved the application of a 6 degree of freedom time domain ship
motion analysis. A large series of runs were prepared to evaluate downtime analysis for a new
container berth.
E.I. Mooring (Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center)
Developed a suite of nonlinear ship mooring models for one and three degree of freedom systems in
the frequency domain. The models are capable of evaluating both linear and nonlinear mooring
dynamics in wind or/and wave spectra, and serve as a powerful, cost-effective tool for diagnostic
analyses of offshore mooring problems. The models have been developed for use by the U.S. Navy
in concert with their design manuals OM-26.5 "Fleet Moorings" and OM-26.4 "Fixed Moorings".
Jupiter Inlet, Florida
Prepared a study of longshore sediment transport in this inlet as part of an overall effort to develop a
sediment management plan for the area.
REGISTRATION
Engineer in Training
EDUCATION
Ph.D. Civil Engineering
M.S., Civil Engineering
B.S., Civil Engineering
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
MOFFATT & NICHOL, ENGINEERS
GRAY SMITH
Coastal/Hydraulic Engineer
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Smith, a Coastal/Ocean Engineer and project manager in Moffatt & NicholS Baltimore office,
has experience in beach fill design, economics and monitoring; dredged material placement and
monitoring; coastal engineering and shore protection; tidal hydrodynamics; and numerical and
laboratory modeling/assessment of flood mitigation measures. He has additional experience in the
areas of coastal structure design, construction cost estimating, barrier island breach management, and
in assessing the efficacy of coastal construction methods. Aside from his primary responsibilities,
Mr. Smith has been involved in civil engineering that includes stormwater management, wetlands,
riverine hydraulics, and site development. He is responsible for contracting, technical calculations,
written reports, feasibility studies, design plans, quality assurance, and project management.
RELEVANT PROJECTS
North Shore of Long Island, Reconnaissance Study
Project engineer of ongoing reconnaissance level study providing storm damage protection and beach
erosion control recommendations for study area from the East River, Queens County to Orient Point,
Suffolk County. Work involves assessing coastal conditions for the recommendation of future Federal
project sites. Coastal process analysis; improvement plan analysis and cost estimates; and
identification of areas most vulnerable to coastal damages are efforts included in this study.
New York District Breach Contingency Plan
Project engineer of extensive evaluation of barrier island breaching potential and subsequent
corrective actions for a fifty mile section of shoreline. This work provides emergency contingency
plans to take effect in the event of severe barrier island storm damages. Performed coastal process
analysis, construction alternative evaluation, breach closure design, site assessment, and numerical
modeling of storm-induced erosion and breach prediction and evolution.
Rikers Island Emergency Shoreline Protection Project
Served as project engineer in evaluating emergency shoreline protection alternatives. Work included
coastal process analysis, coastal structure design, construction cost estimating, and structural analysis
of coastal damage mechanisms to Island infrastructure.
Corpus Christi
Participated in screening of alternatives to lightering of VLCCs for the Port of Corpus Christi
Authority .
Tomes Landing
Provided estimates of water quality impacts and input to project alternative analysis for a private
marina development effort.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Gray Smith (cont'd)
.
Page 2
.
Mitigation of Contaminated Dredge Disposal Material
Conducted extensive numerical model testing of the stability of in-situ capped contaminated
sediments, and examined the feasibility of different remediation measures for dealing with disposal
site contaminants.
Peach Orchard and Chesterwood Parks
Served as project engineer providing coastal design and site assessment input to project developing
plans and specifications for the design of shoreline enhancement and stabilization at two parks.
Project work also included facility upgrade of a derelict boat removal facility, and preparation of
permit application.
Tylers Beach, Virginia
Participated in field investigation of contaminated dredged material disposal and effects on nearby
oyster seeding grounds. Utilized latest technology to monitor dredged material plume movement,
which indicated no negative impacts on oyster bed.
Federal Emergency Management Administration, New England Coastline
Conducted field evaluations of coastal vulnerability to flooding following a major northeaster event.
Recommended remedial measures for approximately 100 miles of eroded Massachusetts coastline.
Revere Beach, Massachusetts
Evaluated coastal flood protection provided by newly-placed beach fill. Study involved laboratory
experiments that defined site-specific runup and overtopping processes, which were used along with
numerical simulation procedures to recommend an optimal design. Effort resulted in significant
savings, as unnecessary coastal revetment was eliminated and replaced with protective dunes.
Beach Fill Engineering
Served as the principal investigator of US Army Corps of Engineers', Coastal Engineering Research
Center, work unit investigating beach nourishment design procedures.
Long Beach, New York
Numerically evaluated long-term shoreline evolution of different beach fill design alternatives.
Recommended design and project tennination procedures.
Glynn County, Georgia
Participated in numerical analysis of beach fill design alternatives. Focused on long-term shoreline
evolution and storm-induced project response.
REGISTRATION
Engineer in Training
EDUCATION
M.C.E., University of Delaware, Civil Engineering
B.S., University of Delaware, Civil Engineering
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 HE::> Ae A TOG A ASS 0 C Ie T E S
I:'.
BRIAN J. McMAHON, AICP
Senior Associate
Professional Experience:
Mr. McMahon specializes in the area of community and open space planning. Prior to joining
The Saratoga Associates, Mr. McMahon was a Principal Environmental Planner for the Maryland
National Capital Park and Planning Commission in Silver Spring, Maryland.
Mr. McMahon has extensive experience with the application of innovative open space planning
programs and has served as conference speaker on open space and fannland preservation
techniques on several occasions.
Representative Waterfront Planning Projects:
· Waterfront Management Plan, Eves Point - The Open Space Institute, New YOJX, NY
· Waterfront Management/Sensitive Habitats Management Alternatives Analysis/Papscanee
Island, East Greenbush, NY - The Open Space Institute, New YOJX, NY
· Geographic Infonnation System for Waterfront Acquisition Planning - Lake George
Basin Land Conservancy/The Nature Conservancy, Lake George, NY
· Continuing assignment - Hudson River Valley Greenway Conservancy and Council,
Albany, NY
· Continuing assignment - The Open Space Institute, New YOJX, NY
· Town of Babylon, NY - Master Plan for a waterfront community
· Town of Potsdam, NY - Raquette River Corridor Master Plan
· Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Syracuse, NY - Land and Recreation Studies along
a variety of river systems
· Horizons Waterfront Action Plan, Erie County, NY - Waterfront revitalization study
Education:
B.A. - Environmental Science and Geography, State University of New York, Plattsburgh
M.S. - Environmental Science, SUNY, College of Environmental Science and Forestry at
Syracuse
Special Recognition:
Currently serves on Board of Directors for the Saratoga Springs Open Space Project
Currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Saratoga County Land Conservancy
Served as Special Assistant to the New York State Governor's Task Force for preparation of
. - -------_.------------ . - - ---. ---_._~------_.--- -----
a Strategic Plan for the Lake George Basin.
Served on the Governor's Environmental Leadership Group, a government and citizen forum
created to address environmental policy issues and regulatory development in Maryland.
..-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lHE S.ATOGA ASSOCaTES
~
WEmUNG ZHANG, MLA
Computer Specialist
Professional Experience:
Ms. Zhang has extensive experience in Geographic InfoImation Systems (ArcInfo - UNIX
Version. PC ArcInfo Arc CAD. MapInfo). AutoCAD/LandCAD and Image Processing (TIPS).
and coordinates projects utilizing these applications. She is proficient in the integration of GIS.
CAD and Image Processing technologies in the planning and design process. Her main areas
of study have been landscape architecture and geography.
Prior to joining The Saratoga Associates. Ms. Zhang was the Manager and Senior Research
Assistant for Metropolitan Landscape Planning (METI.AND) Research Group for the Department
of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning at the University of Massachusetts. Amherst.
She has taught computer applications in landscape planning design using PC ArcInfo. TIPS.
Apple Macintosh computers and Microsoft Word. SuperPaint. and Excel.
Representative Project Experience:
· Town of Babylon. NY - Comprehensive Land Use Plan - GIS Database Development.
Analysis & Mapping
· Lake George Basin Land Conservancy. NY - GIS Database Development. Analysis &
Mapping
· NYS 1bruway Authority - 1\'YS Canal Inventory - GIS Database Development & Mapping
· Town of Keene. NY - Master Plan - GIS Database Development. Analysis & Mapping
· Town of Burlington. MA - Master Plan - GIS Database Development. Analysis & Mapping
· CCAC. PA - Campus Planning - GIS Database Development, Analysis & Mapping
· Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.. NY - Property Inventory - GIS Database Development &
Mapping
· Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.. Salmon River. 1\'Y - GIS Analysis
· Author: The Integration of Computer Technology in Hisroric Preservation and Tawnscape
Enhancement in the Town of Uxbridge. Massachusetts
· Researcher: Comprehensive Investigation and Assessment of Water Pollution in Beijing
Metropolitan Area
· Co-Author: Optimum Condition for Pressure Digestion Technique of Soil and Sediment
Samples Used in Environmental Analysis
· Research Assistant for Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection.
Beijing. P.R China
· Adjunct Lecturer. CADD in Site Planning - Depl of Planning and Geog. SUNY Albany
Education:
Master of Landscape Architecture - University of Massachusetts. Amherst
Master of Science - Geography - University of Massachusetts. Amherst
Bachelor of Science - Geography. Beijing University. Beijing. China
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE SAeATOGA ASSOCaTES
~
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) PRO.TECTS
· Lake George Basin Land Conservancy, Lake George, New York - Needs assessment, data
collection and development of a land oust's conservation strategy. Products included a
multi-tier conservation strategy and a three-dimensional digital terrain model.
· New York State Canal System Inventory, New York - GIS for 524-mile water corridor
linking canal systems throughout New York State. Approximately 6,000 individual parcels
will be inventoried and analyzed as the first phase toward a comprehensive master plan to
develop and preserve recreational, economic, and cultural resources.
· Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Syracuse, New York - Evaluation of alternative mixes
of land uses using economic and environmental management, environmental preservation and
recreation enhancement program for NMPC holdings throughout New York State. Plan is
focusing on the analysis of highest and best use of 90,000+ acres of non-operating utility
company property for over 20 site projects along the Hudson River, Raquette River, Black
River and Salmon River. Currently providing database management for entire holdings.
· Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Lake Luzeme Property, New York - GIS mapping and
overlay analysis of NMPC Lake Luzerne property. Site development opportunities and
constraints analyzed to select site conservation and development zones. Coordinated with
Forestry Department Timber Management Plan and data.
· Town of Keene, New York - First Adirondack Park town to prepare complete Geographic
Information System (G.I.S.) using Arc-Info for community master planning and natural
resources management. Coordinated with existing Arc-Info databases from Adirondack Park
Agency (APA) and NYS Department of Equalization and Assessment for project use.
· Town of Stuyvesant, New York - Development of a parcel-based GIS inventory for analysis
of agricultural preservation, waterfront protection and tourism development. Funded by the
Hudson River Valley Greenway Council as a model cities project.
· Town of Jamestown, New York - Completion of a GIS inventory for examining alternative
economic development strategies.
· Town of Burlington, Massachusetts Master PUl1l - Community master plan including data
collection, public participation surveys, scheduling and coordinating public meetings, land
use plan, and development of Town goals and policies. GIS will be utilized for this project,
. ---- coordinating with Massachusetts GIS.
· Town of Babylon, New York - Coordination and management of Master Plan using ArcInfo,
GIS system for purposes of townwide planning with special emphasis on use of GIS for
demographic analysis.
· Horizons Waterfront Commission, Inc., Waterfront Action Plan, Erie County, New York-
Coordinated digital mapping and analysis of natural and manmade attributes for
comprehensive planning of 90-mile study corridor along Lake Erie and the Niagara River.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
THE S A. A TOG A Ass 0 C . T E S
II
· Sterling Site Task Force, Sterling, New York - Coordinated GIS mapping project, included
mapping the propeny boundaries, topography, and inventory and analysis of over 12
environmental factors for application in highest and best use analysis.
· IBM, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown, New York - GIS mapping of propeny
and various environmental data for use in planning and regulatory compliance issues.
· Off-Campus Centers, Community College of Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-
Feasibility and need determination of off-campus centers using demographic analysis of area
school population and GIS program.
· Fulton County Community College, Johnstown, New York - Automated mapping of campus
sp~e~ utilization f?r~~,aster plllIll1ing and sPac:e programmingo. . . .,..' '....., .''_
"...------0..-- _,_ _ .._ _. ..... '.'_"'__~_'.____'____~___ n . _~ .__..____.._.__._~..__.._
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lH.I: :'.ATOGA ASSOC"TES
El
WATERFRONTS
· Horizons Waterfront Action Plan, Erie County, New York - Preparation of an award-
winning strategic land use plan for 90 miles of the Erie County waterfront which identifies
and facilitates immediate development projects of both a public and private nature, identi-
fies long-term private development and public improvement (e.g., recreational,
infrastructure) opponunities, and provides the policy framework for ongoing management
of the shoreline.
· Champlain Canal Corridor Development Study, Lake George, New York - Evaluation of
the canal system to guide local communities in the development of strategies that utilize the
Canal Corridor as a stimulus for increased tourism, recreation and economic development
Specific products of the study include: I) identification of historic and other regionally
significant sites and areas; 2) public participation; 3) development of goals and objectives;
4) formulation of appropriate proposal development of regional significance and; 5)
identification of public and private-sector funding sources.
· Master Plan Recommendations for Papscanee Island, East Greenbush, New York _
Developed a comprehensive master plan recommendation for the conservation and develop-
ment of the town's waterfront. The plan emphasized the preservation of significant tidal
habitat along the Hudson River, protection of world-class agricultural soils and creation of
an lOD-acre waterfront park.
· Eve's Point Conservation Plan Saugerties, New York - Unique management plan of large
waterfront conservation/recreation area along the Hudson River prepared on behalf of the
Open Space Institute and Scenic Hudson, Inc. The plan established the framework for
integrated management by the Palisades Interstate Park Commission of state-owned land
and property owned by the land trusts. Primary focus of plan was production of visual and
open space character.
· Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Upper Hudson Parcel Management and APA
Permitting - Preparation of a comprehensive land use plan for an IS-mile stretch of the
Hudson River between HadIeylLake Luzeme to Warrensburg in Saratoga and Warren
Counties. The plan included residential use, hamlet commercial and a significant green way
along the east side of the river. Comprehensive plan submitted and approved by the
Adirondack Park Agency allowed sale of residential parcels to lessees as well as
implementation of the Greenway concept *The plan received two awards: The Adirondack
Centennial Awardfor Business and from the Adirondack Council.
· Orchard Beach, Pelham Bay Park, Bronx, New York - Master plan for development of
high-use waterfront recreation area, including consideration of both passive and active water
related activities.
· Potsdam Riverfront, Potstlam, New York - Riverfront and corridor action plan including
the exploration of the enhancement, development and recreational/environmental protection
and potential of the Raquette River. This project resulted in the preservation of Potsdam's
riverfront resources, while creating new projects for the central business district
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 H E ~.. A TOG A ASS 0 C Ie T E S
(g
.
Hamlet 0/ North Creek, New York - Creation of a Downtown Revitalization plan which
includes a Hudson Riverfront park and cultural area, walking trails and incentives for
business development.
.
Oswego Harbor/ront, Oswego, New York - Conceptual development plan for tourism and
recreational development potential of the harbor area including linkage to the downtown
business district on Lake Ontario.
.
Waterfront Studies - Rensselaer Coastal Zone, Greenport Coastal Zone, Rochester Canal
Zone, North Greenbush Coastal Zone, Buffalo Waterfront, Waterford Canal.
.
Development Feasibility Study, Breneman_Site, Oswego, New York. Feasibility study of
five-acre site and a 150,000 s.f. mill complex to determine best use, includiing site analysis,
market survey, financial feasibility, and preparation of the RFP to developers.
.
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation - Hydroelectric Relicensing/River Systems Analysis.
Analysis of land use recreation and environmental enhancement components for Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) relicensing application (Exhibit E) associated with
several hydroelectric facilities on six river systems. Evaluation of alternative mixes of land
uses using economic and environmental criteria to assist in developing a multi-objective
land management, environmental preservation and recreational enhancement program.
.
Chalmers Building Development Plan and Strategy, Amsterdam, New York - Feasibility
Study for Montgomery County Economic Development Corporation to explore the possible
uses of the former Chalmers Knitting Mill, a 300,000 s.f. vacant building zoned as light
industrial and incorporated into the neighborhood character.
.
Sterling Site, Lake Ontario, New York - Feasibility study for 2,8oo-acre parcel owned by
Rochester Gas & Electric (RG&E) on Lake Ontario's shoreline known as Sterling Site. The
study incorporates a development plan and strategy to include mixed use, shoreline
recreation, conservation areas and infrastrucrure improvements. The scope includes market
feasibility and economic evaluation, physical planning, environmental planning and
regulatory processing.
.
Moreau Industrial Park, South Glens Falls, New York - Working with the Saratoga
Economic Development Corporation and Niagara Mohawk Corporation, The Saratoga
Associates are providing a master plan and design of a 265-acre industrial park along the
Hudson River. Development of the park could create 4,900 new jobs and tremendous
economic opportunity for the area.
.
Hudson River Greenway Inventory, Hudson River Greenway Council, Albany, New York-
Completion of a management study for the council's geographic information system data
base for the Hudson River Valley. Emphasis on creating opportunities for integration with
local and county planning programs.
.
-
THE SAeATOGA ASSOC.TES
.
-
-
-
. New York State Canal Inventory, New York State Thruway - Preparation of a
comprehensive inventory of land and structures along the 524-mi1e New York State canal
system. Services include inventory development and supporting GIS and data input, data
conversion, photogrammetric interpretation and field reconnaissance services.
.
.
. Buffalo Waterfront, Erie County, New York - TSA assisted the ECIDA in the site develop-
ment of industrial sites throughout Erie County to encourage local businesses to maintain
their current operation as well as to assist them in expansion programs to provide more job
opportunities. The process provided for a site analysis and understanding of the program
needs of the industry, an environmental assessment of the potential impacts associated with
any expansion program, and plans for the ultimate development of the expansion. The
program was intended to review a variety of sites including the inner-city urban locations
and the waterfront sites.
-
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. Harborfront, Lackawanna, New York - Award-winning comprehensive redevelopment
'"plans and'strategy for the 1350-acre; former Bethlehem Steel heavy industrial site on Lake
Erie. The master plan included environmental, industrial and recreational land use
components.
WTR.LP
-------------------
GIS Projects
The Saratoga
.
Index
A$$ocia te$
1994
TOWN OF KEENE
MA$TER PLAN
- New York
- Massachusetts
- Pennsylvania
LAKE GEORGE BA$IN
LAND CONSERVANCY
,.
,.
t"-
I
i
.,
i
j
i
i
j
j
j
i
i .
.---------.---.-----. /-~.;
----------------
~ c~C CAMPUS
PLANNING
TOWN OF BURLINGTON
._._~STE~PU~
f'"'
~.
NEW YORK STA TE' \
CANALS INVENTORY I .,
__. L__._._._._._._ .}.. <:.~
-.-.-.-.-.-\.\ i \ ",-_.J\
J. " ,,'~ -'- J
. \,.......,. '.
t.. ....
.....7'o.! l> ..
I ~,
....... \ ".
/ .......... (". /.(\..~.
""'. ] --- /..
I {./..-.J-' ",,'
. - .",.-
f a_.",,' .
l?......_.~ TOWN OF BABYLON
COMPREHEN$IVE
LAND USE PLAN
/
i
i
"
"
>
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1/
"
'.
'\..--\
L(';.t~)
::;::~-- r:t:
;- , '--'-!lL
i, > ;::J -;;--~ '_
'-"_ i m ~.._-'_
'J U'l ~--
z::>
li!8
.~,....~
,
\
\
\
\ -"
.__J ,~ j
, -
1,.1-
,j7~
1 '
(
f.--
I
\~....,I"'''''''--\
\.--.----\
----
--..
..----r\
::> \
o \
U i
is \
O ""
".
~
, .~
. '-/"' \
".
''''''
\
.--..-......\
......-
....--......
i
,.
-,.
/
/
/
/
"
/
i;; //
~,/
() ~--
....u i
--" \"
-----.--- @ ,
u \
!;t .
111._......----
~---_._.__.~
---
!
'.
\
,
\
\
,
\
~
::>
o
U
~.,.~",.,..,
~~ ),/
( ,/,'
!:>.-..~~t/
"
l(
~/
i
i
/'
..
\
!
\../
..
"
...
"
/
I.
\./
//
,/
{
,j
/
/
i
,J
~..
\ -
\
l
I 11
O.
~ \
\
Jj
J J
. .
J I
dlJ)lJ
!J I I I
<::.!3. .0'
UPlji
fLU
J~~.;<."I:~:t
~~~!.
-< 6' 00
= ..
· .f
tr.l Il. :IF.'
~ ~ n.ln
u
~ 0 Inlll
Ol~ 1,,,"
tr.lJ .
;lJ>l
::;l~~ li~
.,1
tr.lr I'R
ca ::.
:;;;> " ~d
o Jl I roll!
.... fit;:
~ !II"
:Ia.
.1!".1
rI HI
..I
b I
'IlB HI
t~ UJ
I' -
sit r
I
'G j I '" I J
I
e I Ij I
)
JzllJj~ II I
t
,
i
I
..,." ,
I ! ~ \ CHAMPlAIN CANAL
~CORRIDOR STUDY
The Saratoga Asoeiates
I
MASTER PLAN
I
0..-. ,,,)
-..
TIc Lak 0...-.J.Mc GMJIO
---
I
I
I
GLENS FALLS FEEDER CANAL
CORRIDOR
. HUDSON RIVER OVERLOOK
. HAVILAND'S COVE PARK
. UME KILN STATION
. MAIN STREET COMMERCIAL
AREA AND THE BOAT BASIN
. PEARL STRE.."T HISTORIC
DISTRICT AND CULTURAL
AREA
. SAWMILL GREENWAY AND
LOCK 12
. FIVE COMBINES. RESTORED
LOCK AND CANALBOAT RIDE
. BOND CREEK BOAT BASIN
. TRAIL UNKAGE
I
I
I
I
GLENS FALLS -
ADIRONDACK GATEWAY I
CENTRAL CJ1Y
. CANAL I RIVER WATERFRONT
REVIT ALlZA TlON
. MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
AND DOWNTOWN CONNECTION!
- ENTERTAINMENT \
. THEATER .
- COMMERCIAL (FOOD. SHOPS.
ACCOMMODATIONS)
. RESIDENTIAL
. POTENTIAL VISITORS' c:e.J\'TER
I
I
I
I
'_rl.~
I
I
I
,....r......
I
Figure 18.
m ICIIUt'UIlVlLU, 4UANY.
_ YOU ern
.
.
TR.uL TO~',,4I); sn.I!ET.
KENiSaClROUGHDRJVE
WHITEHALL _
LAKE'NORTHERN GA TEW A\'
. URBAN CULTURAL PARK
. HARBOR I BOAT LA UNCH
. EDUCATIONAL I HISTORIC
THEME
. EXPAND LODGING AND
SERVICES
. HOSPITAUTY LOCK (12)
,_..r_
MULTI-USE. FOUR SEASON
CANAL CORRIDOR. CONNECT
WITH FEEDER CANAL TRAIL.
SEGMENTS AS MARKED
. BOATING
. BIKING
. WALKING I HIKING
. SNOWMOBILING (AS NOTED) .
. HORSEBACK RIDING
. AUTO ROUTE
. CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING
'IN-UNESKATING
PROPOSED CAMPING AREA
..:t.~. ,~~~
'; ~I\I--
"j ,-"'....-
FORT ANN - MIDWAY POINT
. PROVIDE ANCHORAGE SITE
. CONNECTION TO VILLAGE
CENTER
....
/'c~
..
\l.~
HUDSON FALLS
. FEEDER CANAL CORRIDOR
. CANAL-SIDE COMMERCIAL I
RECREATION ENHANCEMEi'ITS
'J_"~
.....
-.-
BLUE HERON NESTING SITES.
ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE
AREA
FORT EDWARD.
RlVERlSOUTIIERN GA TEW A V
. V ACHT BASIN AND PARK
. ROGERS ISLAND
. OLD FORT HISTORIC THEME
. OLD CHAMPLAIN CANAL
TRAIL
. AQUEDUCT PARK
. HOSPITALITY LOCK m
-'.
T_.......
-
IiIIIIlIlIIII
....
CAHAl.""""'.....
...-..........
.......
taAn.~C\NAl...Sl'KEZT
SC"AU I: C2.lXJJ
--
~ ,.~,_.. f_
(J)
-
.-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Cultural Resources
I'
r
'--, :'..(
/ ""'1---
~~~.....);:.-
"',~
~Ilamm-~/;-" '[ \'~.::nhnJ
uz;P '_\.........
-_I .J-.:--
/ - t\
! _r-,I
/-0-
I i-::-
IL/
,-/:,,/
\) J~::' '-
'''' :
FortAmr~~~cnrt
-----; A=
, r
/i~ "
"""';\ : j
~ ~;;15
0=<0II / ~
J..1btz1y\ I-'~Ir,,'\.j
~ \ \'" '~~ I "'c--___Ub=y
M= \~r-\. .Y, 'r \ \
.,.:\ ~~~~-~~ FwtUJ-mN=I..ll1=y
~~'e ?~Fort '~~==::.-
\'-"E:twu:tl-"~
:;....:--~ adFQ11ff::c=~
f--.--__.)
V
\,/
c1y
.'lOHTH
l Urtmn Cu!tur.1/ Park
CuIJizraI Fm:iTdies
A GIS system may be used to analyze many types of data. The ARCINFO sysr= allows data
to be layered and compared with other information, with all layers accurately located. These
examples show how various factors influencing the corridor plan were studied and compared to
projects currently planned.
CHAMPLAIN CANAL CORRIDOR
Figure 5.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~G
~~
~ffi
OV)
~~
t5u
~~
~
o
~
~
3
~
~
lfi:
>-<~
~~
Cf}u
-- 5- ~_u
eio
rnZ
>~
!
J
l~ ·
C]
GI
!9
'"
...J
=
to
:>
~
z
~
c.?
a;
I
-~ ..
~~0 ~
"J\~~ !<.
"'v~~ 3
=
-
.
.
.
TOWN OF KEENE, NY
Development of the town master plan and site plan
review guidelines. Specific design guidelines were
developed for four common scenic landscape themes
present within the town, including hamlets and historic
gateways, steep slopes and ridgelines, highway
corridors and upland areas.
Master Plan
Community Character Guidelines
THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OVERlAY OF
CONSERVATION
&
DEVELOPMENT
FACTORS
. High Conservation
. Moderate Conservation
. High Development
. Moderate Development
. High Conservation &
High Development
II High Conservation &
. Moderate Development
!!ill Moderate Conservation &
High Development
o Moderate Conservation &
Moderate Development
D Low Conservation or
Low Development
IlYI Private Land Boundary
(Total 2%18 Peres)
t l' ..
.' .
. .
~
.-
-
\:--^"
)
.
\
\v, ~-
~ ~/'---------- ---
~ ~------ .-
~ .-
J
)lJ
/
.
11 . . t "
ovuur FACIOlS
HIGH CONSERVATION
MODERATE CONSERVAtION
m GH DEVELOPMENt
MODE UTE DEVELOPMENT
. - m GH CONS. , HI GH on.
m GH CONS. 'MOD. DEV.
MOD. CONS. 'HI GH DEV.
MOD. CONS. 'MOD. DEV.
LOW VALUES
, . .
,,1 l II I'"
I
.~
~r=;.
-
-
"
.- -.
'.
:
iV
.
--
r
.
.
9
J.r~
.," '\....--
/> ';:f '.
/.
. .
.
. .
ACREAGE PElCENTAGE Of
PUVAtE UNO
TOWN OF KEENE MASTER PlAN
ESSEX COUNTY. NEW ~
14 30.04
2547.95
1207. H
1102.19
1014.79.
511.71
SlI.Il
721.10
10017.21
1.13
1.10
14.21
20. 10
3.51
I. 75
I. 13
2. IS
33. "
The Soratop ........-
.
-
.
--
~
. - -
""101:1
~.Al""~""",,,,,,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
ANALYSIS 1
.
TOWN OF BABYLON
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
DEMOGR.6J>HICS PlANNING
l!CEND:
ANAl. YSIS 1
Il1ICIlI'!!R>'<
a) Median ...
Yayn... ThIn m VIllI
b) ModI.. -.. _
1.8 Thon S4J.>,3JlQ
c....~..._
..... Thon 3A
OClll'!!R>'<
IJ Median /WI:
Oldor Thon ns _
b) Mldiln .....ald kIcDmt:
..... '!ban SC2,513JlQ
c_..._
1.8 Thon 1A
Iii OTHERS
/ 1. Jil lb. ""
~Q'Ril9~'f4l: .\0 ~.~
. <0, ~ _ ~ \ _~;~
,-1..,,2:""-'- :;;,::--t
.~ .,.J::.;r~.) ,/ -...-..~ .~ y~-- .
[-~. ~;:., .-' . ".;> I -.....:.- ~I
I /" '_'_ "'''"=7, 1~:i;..lV/\r __-_____ I
~ ~ ... ~'"'"": 0:"'\ Ii: _ ~r \ -;
q '-"".<t/e,'::z(' "'-. \ ,-.I'.:..t::==-,.-,JP' ___-.,:. !
I ~,.~ - "'I.J-:-. ",/ i
"'- --.' ....,. ,- -- - .~'
F::=:l:i'l.;~ ,..i-:~'-- '
~'1 ,_/ ,-<.;' J "> .~-~_____ t!i
:1.1 .-.-.......~ ;.-....--..../.. ~ 1
n ~::.-- -,,/ -
..-'.... --........-. -
~...
I _______
l-......
The Town of Babylon, located on Long Wand, is a
built-out community with a 2OO.o<Xl::t: population. TSA
is developing a GIS-based community comprehensive
land use plan focused on social, demographic, economic
and physical factors. A major component of the plan is
the rewrite of Development Guidelines and the Zoning
Ordinance. Also included is data collection, planning
surveys. scheduling and coordinating public meetings.
SEQRA issues and development ofEAF-EIS.
TOWN OF BABYLON, NY
Comprehensive Master Plan
Downtown Revitalization Plan
SEQRA Compliance
Zoning Revisions
Design Guidelines
THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
MEDIo\N HOIJSEHOLD I~COME
. Ia ,. ....
II uu. to....
......"'--
g....tD......
DlU.-lCI__
liGIDIIR........
POPULATION PER HOUSEHOLD
....
0.......
SUo'"
.-..
'.
IVCE I ETHNIC GROUP ,-\NAL YSIS
OW!Cfl)o_....
-.:=c 1ft
._".....
.....~--
8-..0:__'
_U:C ....
811IIO:_..'
~-..
.......\,C......
-.:c_.
......
IJMIIlI\Cc ...
_c_,
... . ..
.
HOUSEHOLD VALU5PER CENSUS TIY'CT. 1989
----.....
.--
...~....
. ".. 10.....
C .1.... 1V .....
8-----
a.-nl1Mil\__
M'\IORITY WORKERS:
II =-"'~_
O::::",ClCIUM_
TOWN OF
BABYLON, NY
Geographic Information System
As part of the planning commission, a compre-
hensive GIS system was developed for the . _ __.__
-'- town; While this GIS was eXlremely vaIuable- -- - ,- - -
during the planning process, it was conceived
and constructed as a long-term management
tool for Town government
THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES
.
-------------------
G1J~ trLrJ t~J It~.: ~ -J ~Ll
-'- . fillHl:::: -- ~ ~ -= -'r LEGEND,
1 --1\
:' ,.-~~;~-~I- =,llli\
.:../\\.\
-')1 \ /
',. . ~\:J-l- .'
-" I
TOWN OF IlA8YLON
COMPREHENSIVE lAND USE PlAN
lAND USE 1992
. "fIrlcultural
o Residential
n Va"In'
. Commercial
['J Recreation
. Community Sarvla!
. Industrial
l!l Public Sarvla!
1m! Wild Land and Park
.
lcatlon ~D
~1f1
.
SCAlE 1 : 6.000 'tJ
-- -. _ ,.---.....- ./
r--"ii!- I \ I
o 150 500 1,000 FT. -,'
The Saratoga I'osociales
.
Greenman-Pedersen, Inc.
I
.
.
I
I
... TOWN Cl!NTEII.
ENHANCECOMUUNnYlDENTnY
AS A PEDESTRlAN.QRIENTED
COMMERCIAL AND CIVIC CENTER
II. NEIGHBORHOODS_
MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE
PUBUC SPACES AND
AMENmes
L GREENWAY, OPEN SPACE ANt
RESOURCE PROTECTION
TRAILS WHERE APPROPRIATe
I
I
B. VINE BROOK.
WATER RESOURce PROTEcnON
AND NATURE OBSERVAnON
K. MILL POND PRESERVE-
NATURAL RESOURCE
PROTEcnoN AND PASSIVE
OUTDOOR RECREATION
I
C. &.-- ~T\RR(E- AREA"
IlI!!lEARCH AND lIEVEI.llPMENr
CAMPUS CORRIDOR. CREATE
lNTI!RNAL SPI'lE ROAD SYSTal
I
J. HOUSlNG OPTIONS
I
I
D. SOUTHERN GATEWAY.
HOSPlTAUTY AND SUPPORT
USES;CREATE INTERCHANGE
IMPROVEMENTS
E. BURUNGTON MALL ROAD. AREA 112
MAINTAIN PREMIER COIWERCIAL
CHARACTER
'~ji~~, ,~
-".;~c'~"~' ~:-H. CAMBRIDGE STREET SOLJTH.
AREA ..
I!NHANCED COMMERCIAL
CORRIDOR
HOUSING OPTIONS
L WlNN STREET
NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL. ENHANCI
APPEARANCE/VISUAL
AMENmES
I
G. TOWN GATEWAY (TYPICAl.).
WelCOMING LANDSCAPE
lREATIIIENT AND S1GNAGE
I
'"SEE REPORT FOR FURTHER INFORMAnON
F. WHEELERlBLANCHARD
ROADS- AREA 13
PLANNED COMMERClAU
INDUSTRIAL REVlTAUZATlON
ANn nlrrnnnR R~r.RF.&nnN
I
I
TOWN OF
BURLINGTON, MA
Goals and strategies and comprehensive land use
services for the development of a comprehensive plan.
A town-wide resident and business survey, and an
inventory and build-out analysis using GIS
technology led to the development of a plan enhancing
town character, economic development and open space
preservation.
I
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Downtown Revitalization
Economic Development
I
I
I
I
THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
":- ."~""r,..." :>:l
T.SARATOGA ASSOCIATES.
l
!<.
!
~
....
IiI Iii III
/ill " "
,1/ 11111111'"
/ I I'll III J I II
~,,~~ :';:,,": ;', ',;::::', '.'
\),,~ 1111/ 1,,'II,IIII,;llI\1
_ _ \ ~/:!I.f.JII 1-/",' ~ II I" \
\\,..,'\,', \
\ \\,\\ \ \ \ \
\ \ \\ \ \ \ \
HORIZONS WATERFRONT
COMMISSION
Preparation of . physical land
use plan for 90 mi1es of Erie
Cowry shore1ine to identify
private and publie develop-
ment improvement projeets
and provide. policy frame-
wodc for OII8oiug management
of the shore1ine. A plan was
developed for =ation,
IIlInsportalion and develop-
ment oppommitiea.
Wa!Ctfront Action Plan,
Erie County, New York
Also, an Environmental
Impact Sratement (ElS) was
prepared. Within the
framewodc of an aetive public
participation process, the
..
m
~
,
\
\
fundamental objective was to
bridge divergent economic and
environmental interests,
regional and local perspec_
tives, development and
preservation intetests into .
cohesive waterfront plan.
The illustration above is an
artist's rendering of the Harilor
Development area, which is
one of ten Phase I projeets to
be developed in the ovc:n1l
plan.
Two projects an: now in the
design phases.
.
.
1993 HONOR AWARDS
- - - --- _. .---- --.. --
... Horizons Waterfront Action Plan
Erie County (Buffalo), New York
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Waterfront Plans
The work recognized here is a truly
comprehensive plan for the Lake Erie
shoreline that comprises the ma:ching
orders for a significant intergovernmen-
tal body, the Horizons Waterfront Com-
mission, Ine.
This entity, a subsidiary of the New
York State Uman Development Corp., is
itself a major accomplishment The com-
munities of BuHalo, Lackawanna, Tona-
wanda, Hamburg, Evans and Brant plus
Erie County and later Grand Island all
joined forces to form the corporation,
recognizing Horizons as the lead agency
in certain projects, the master planning
instrument, coordinator of private invest-
ment and as the vehicle for Federal and
other assistance. Horizons Waterfront
Commission is go\'emed by 16 voting
plus 18 non-voting members.
The master plan addresses the chal.
lenge of how best to convert the consid-
erable industrial acreage along the shores
of Lake Erie into new and different uses,
blending the myriad and sometimes con-
flicting aspirations of the different com-
munities and interest groups in the area.
An additional challenge for the five-firm
planning team was to develop year- .
'round uses in an area with severe winters.
The team has developed an action
plan and implementation strategy as
well as establishing broad goals. Among
its sound planning principles are the
suggestions that waterfront . acti\~ty
centers" be established for public enjoy-
ment, that these centers be linked to each
other and their communities with a
greenway system of parkways and traJis,
and that both the natural and built
environments be celebrated.
Presented to: Daniel Sitler, principal,
Saratoga Associates, Saratoga Springs,
N.Y.; Thomas D. Blanchard Jr., presi-
dent, Horizons Waterfront Commission,
Buffalo, N.Y.
Iii.! V1EV l"AI:.I<
I....''''''') "
~~
~#
~
-
...~,
\
--.."
-
\
PHkSE 1
IiMLOI"I1ENT \
~
F:':~
ILLUSTRATIVE
DEVELOPMENT
PLANS FOR
RIVERFRONT PARK
.
.
.
.
PROPOSAL
.
.
Consulting Services
Local Erosion Management Plan
.
Submitted to:
Town of Southold
Southold, New York
.
December 6, 1994
.
.
First Coastal Corporation
161 Sunset Avenue, Westhampton Beach, New York 1197B - (516) 2BB -2271
.
.
.
Cashin Associates,
.
P.C.
Engineers and Architects
Hauppauge, NY. Woodcliff Lake, N.J . Miami, FL
December 5, 1994
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Proposal for Consulting Services -- Development of a Local Erosion
Management Plan
Dear Ms. Terry:
Cashin Associates, P.c. is pleased to submit the enclosed proposal (7 copies) for
development of a Local Erosion Management Plan. The proposal has been prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the Town's Request for Proposal and discussions
held at the pre-submission conference on November 17, 1994.
The proposal includes a discussion of our technical work programs, qualifications,
project team, and fee proposal. Please note that we have also submitted an Insurance
Certificate stating the limits of our professional and general liability insurance and
naming the Town of Southold as the Certificate Holder. As Cashin Associates, P.c. is a
Professional Corporation in the State of New York, our performance is not covered
under bond guarantees, but by professional liability insurance. If required, clients can
be named as additional insureds under such policies.
For this assignment we have included the firm of First Coastal Corporation as a
subconsultant to assist in addressing specific technical issues relating to coastal
processes. Together, our two firms have the full range of professional and support
resources to complete this project within the Town's schedule and budgetary
constraints.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal.
Very truly yours,
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
~T.~
Gregory T. Greene
Director of Environmental Programs
GTG/tf
9400-249
Enclosures
1200 Veterans Memorial Highway. Hauppauge, NY 11788 . {516l 34B~7600 . FAX (51 Bl 348-7801
Sea~n, Ross & Wiener,
6851 Jericho Turnpike
Syosset NY 11791
Douglas Schenendorf
516-921-9100
INSURED
Inc.
n. ..CsRTti DATE (MMIDDIYV)
.CA5HINA 11/30/94
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
A.~..lt...
CERTIFICATA>F INSURANCE
PRODUCER
COMPANY
A
ROYAL INSURANCE
COMPANY
B
Cashin Associates P.C.
1200 Veterans Mem Hwy- Ste 200
Hauppauge NY 11788
COMPANY
C
MISCELLANEOUS
~
ST. PAUL
FIRE & MARINE
COMPANY
D
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE
INDICATED, NOlWlTHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO
LTR
lYPI! OF INSURANCE
POUCY NUMBER
POUCY EJ::FEcnVE POUCY EXPlRATiON
DATE (MM/DDIYV) DATE (MM/ODIYV)
UMITS
GENERAl UABIUTY
B X COMMERClALGENERAlUABIUTY RP06628461
ClAIMS MADE 00 OCCUR
OWNER'S 6. CONTRACTOR'S PROT
07/08/94
07/08/95
GENERAl AGGREGATE $ 5,000,000
PRODUCTS. OOMP/op AGG $ 5,000,000
PERSONAl & ADV INJURY $ 5,000,000
EACH CX::CURRENCE $ 5,000,000
FIRE DAMAGE (Anyone fire) $ 5,000,000
MEO EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000
AUTOMOBILE UABIUTV
A X ANY AUTO
AU. OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS
NON-owNEO AUTOS
RST212278
07/08/94
07/08/95
COMBINED SINGLE UMIT
.
BODILY INJURY
(Per person)
.
BOOIL Y INJURY
(Per accident)
.
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
GARAGE UABIUTY
ANYAllTO
EXCESS UABIUTY
A X UMBRELlA FOAM
OTHER mAN UMBREUA FORM
A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' lIABIUTY
PLA330543
07/08/94
07/08/95
AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $
OTHER TIiAN AUTO ONLY:
EACH ACCIDENT $
AGGREGATE $
EACH OCCURRENCE $ 3,000,000
AGGREGATE $ 3,000,000
.
X STATUTORYUMITS
EACH ACCIDENT
THE PROPRIETOR/
PARTNERS/EXECUTlVE
OFFICERS ARE:
OTHER
INCL 95PCS326136
EXCL
05/01/94
05/01/95
DISEASE. POUCY UMIT $
DISEASE. EACH EMPlOYEE $
A Acct Rec/Va1 Pap
C Comm Umbre 11 a
PLA330543
TBA/UMBRELLA
07/08/94
11/23/94
07/08/95
11/23/95
$350.000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATlONS/LOCATlONSNEHICLES/SPECIALITEMS
CERTIFICATE HOLDER INCLUDED AS ADOlTIONAL INSURED WITH RESPECTS TO THE
OPERATIONS OF CASHIN ASSOCIATES P.C.
TOWNOFS
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POUCIES BE CANCEllED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION OATETHEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPAHYW1Ll ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
~ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTlACATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,
BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALl IMPOSE NO OBUGATlON OR UABIUTY
OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TOWN HALL
53095 MAIN ROAD
P.O. BOX 1179
SOUTHOLD NY 11971
------ ... IF .
A4.4~1.1~ . .
'_H~~~~~-:->>~ERTIFICA TE INSURANCE
.
~ DAle (MM/OOIYY)
'ROlIJC6<
lEAMAN ROSS & WIENER,INC
'0 BOX 468
;851 JERICHO TPKE
lYOSSET, NY
L1791
116-921-9100
11-30-94
THIS CERTIFIt:krE IS Is!'iUEiD Aii,(l\II..dygROF INFORMATION ONLY AND
CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE
DOES NOT AMEND. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE
POLICIES BELOW.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
......"
COMPANY AC.N.A.
LETTER
COMPANY B
lETTER
COMPANY C
LETTER
COMPANY D
LEITER
COMPANY E
lETTER
:ASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C.
:ASHIN TECHNICAL SERVICE
L200 Veterans Highway
Iauppauge, NY 11788
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATEDtNOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENL TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICA E MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAJ~ THt: INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO All THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POU....IES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID ClAIMS.
lJ.
.TR
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY .........
POLICYa=FH:1lVE PCl.JCY EXPRATION
DATE (MM/OO/VY) DATE (MMIDDIYV)
LMITS
GENBW... UABLITY
(X)f,..1MERSIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
a..A1MSMADE DOCCUR
OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S ffiOT.
PROF.
LIABILITY
3987823
GENEFW. AGGREGATE
PAODUCTS-coMP!OPS I>GG.
PERSONAl & N:N. INJURY
EACH OCCURRENCE
6-30-94 6-30-95 FIRE [)At..4h3E (Anyone fire) $
MED. EXPENSE (Anyone pelSon)
<xJMBINED SINGLE $
L"'rr
BOOIL Y INJURY $
(Per person)
EKlO/LYINJURY $
(Per accident)
propERTY QAM.&GE $
EACH """"""NCE $
""'REGAlE $
,
AUTOMOOLE UABLITY
Mf( AUTO
All O'vWIIED AUTOS
SCHEOUlEO AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS
NQI\I-CM'NEO AUTOS
GARAGE LIABILITY
EXCESS UABIUlY
UMBRELLA FCHA
OTHER THMI UMBRELLA FOFtv1
WOFU<ER'S COMPeISATKlN
TWO
EMR...OYERS'LIABlJTY
DISEASE-POlICY Lf..4IT
DSEftSE-EACH EMPLOYEE
""""
[ES'CRPTlQN <F OPERA. TIONSILOCATIONS/VEHICLES/5PECIAL. nBtS
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO
MAlL30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR
LlABlLllY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITSAG NTS OR REP!tE~ENTATIVES.
~/C7
WWN OF SOUTHOLD
WWN HALL
;3095 MAIN ROAD
'.0. BOX 1179
;OUTHOLD, NY 11971
.
.
.
PROPOSAL
.
CONSULTING SERVICES
LOCAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PLAN
.
.
Submitted To:
.
Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Southo/d Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southo/d, New York 11971
.
Prepared By:
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
Engineers and Architects
1200 Veterans Memorial Highway
Hauppauge, New York 11788
(516) 348-7600
in association with:
.
FIRST COASTAL CORPORA TlON
161 Sunset Avenue
Westhampton Beach, New York 11978
(516) 288-2271
.
December 6, 1994
.
.
.
.
.
.
J(ia
~c:~
Section One
IntrocCuction---ancC Overvtew
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
.
Introductorv Statement
.
Cashin Associates, P.c. (CA), in associated with First Coastal Corp., has prepared this
proposal in response to the Town of Southold's Request for Proposal (RFP) for
consulting services to develop a Local Erosion Management Plan for the Town. CA has
reviewed the RFP and attended the pre-submission conference held on November 17,
.
1994, and we are familiar with the Town's objectives and requirements for the project.
Section 2 of this proposal contains our proposed work program for developing a Local
.
Erosion Management Plan within the budgetary and schedule constraints identified in
the RFP. The development of this work program is based on our existing knowledge
of the Town's coastal zone and erosion/flooding issues acquired through our earlier
work on the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP), as well as our
.
extensive coastal zone management experience throughout the region. CA has teamed
with First Coastal Corp. as a subconsultant on this project to ensure that the project
team has all the technical and support resources to complete the assignment.
.
Overview of Oualifications
.
CA's Environmental and Planning Division provides specialized services in coastal and
marine studies, including the preparation of coastal zone management plans, local
waterfront revitalization plans and other coastal zone studies. CA has in-house
personnel with expertise in the full range of disciplines required for these studies,
.
including marine scientists, planners, environmental scientists, geologists, coastal
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
SECTION 1
.
.
.
engineers, transportation planners, economists, and civil engineers. CA's environ-
.
mental scientists and planners have recently assisted in the development of Local
Waterfront Revitalization Programs (LWRP's) for a number of major Long Island
municipalities, including the Town of Southold. They have also completed numerous
.
specific environmental, engineering, and planning studies related to the coastal zone,
erosion and marine resources.
CA has conducted studies of erosion and flooding hazards in coastal areas of New York
.
State. We are familiar with the procedures for assessing such hazards, and the options
available for alleviating erosion and flooding threats. CA also has the capabilities of
assessing the potential economic impacts of storm and flood damage, and of preparing
.
cost estimates for different storm protection measures. CA has performed these
services as part of the planning and pre-design phases of shoreline project
.
developments. Most recently CA has investigated erosion and beach nourishment
issues for projects performed for Suffolk County, and for the Towns of Brookhaven and
Oyster Bay.
.
Because of our prior work in waterfront development plans, CA is familiar with the
sources of information and data required to define shoreline conditions in terms of
their physical characteristics (e.g. beach width, dune height, bluff conditions, etc.) We
.
are familiar with Southold's shoreline areas, its associated erosion issues, and the
reports and studies available as background data for this study. As part of our work
for the Peconic Estuary Program, CA has already investigated the availability of
historical aerial photography for the shoreline areas of Long Island's East End.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES. P.C.
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
SECTION 1
.
.
.
Our recent coastal zone experience includes several projects for the New York State
.
Department of State performed as part of the Governor's Task Force on Erosion
Control. These studies included an analysis of hazard management strategies, local
governmental arrangements for dealing with coastal flooding issues, and an
environmental review of new inlet formation.
.
First Coastal Corp. is a firm which specializes in erosion control issues on Long Island,
and the firm is highly regarded for its technical expertise in addressing erosion issues
.
on eastern Long Island. Cashin Associates, P.c. and First Coastal Corp. are presently
working together in preparation of a Dredging Management Plan and EIS for Suffolk
County.
.
Proiect EXDerience -- Marine and Coastal Studies
.
CA has provided environmental, planning and engineering services for a variety of
marine and coastal projects in the region. Representative projects include:
.
.
Preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Plans for the Towns of
South old, Brookhaven, Huntington, and North Hempstead, New York and
the Villages of Lloyd Harbor and Sag Harbor; and assistance on LWRPs
for the Towns of Islip and Oyster Bay
.
Biological/Geological Resources Assessment for the Suffolk County
Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Comprehensive Dredging
Program, Suffolk County, New York, including analysis of beach
restoration alternatives
.
. Study of Coastal Erosion and Remedial Actions, including field monitoring
of beach profiles, for Stehli/Ransom Beach, Bayville, Town of Oyster Bay
.
Environmental Assessment and Permit Acquisition for Wading River
Channel Improvements and Beach Restoration, Town of Riverhead,
New York
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
SECTION 1
.
.
.
. Detailed botanical and ecological investigation of valuable coastal
wetlands and habitats along the Peconic Bay for the Town of Riverhead,
New York
.
. Preparation of a Harbor Management Plan and supporting technical
studies for the Oyster Bay Harbor, Town of Oyster Bay, New York
. Preparation of Harbor Management Plans for the Villages of Port
Jefferson and Sag Harbor
.
. Technical Studies as part of the Peconic Estuary Program, including
shoreline surveys and analysis for the entire Peconic shoreline of
Southold Town
. Analyses of Shellfish and Sediment Data for Oyster Bay Harbor, Town of
. Oyster Bay, New York
. Environmental and technical studies of the Peconic River system and
estuary, Town of Riverhead, New York
. Design for Shorefront Bulkhead Reconstruction and Erosion for the Town
. of Smithtown, New York
. Environmental Inventory and Study of the Barrier Beach and Bay Island
Communities, Town of Babylon, New York
. Planning and design for remedial measures for erosion, and storm
damage to fishing piers and channels at Mt. Sinai, Town of Brookhaven,
. New York
. Planning and design for repair to storm damage and erosion at Town
shoreline facilities for the Town of Brookhaven
.
First Coastal Corp. has completed numerous technical studies and field investigations
of erosion and shoreline processes for eastern Long Island. The firm has been involved
.
in addressing erosion issues in the region for over 15 years.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C.
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
SECTION 1
.
.
.
Experience of Kev Personnel
.
Work on this assignment would be performed by a team of environmental, planning
and engineering specialists in CA's Environmental Division. Mr. Gregory T. Greene,
.
CA's Director of Environmental Programs, would serve as Principal-in-Charge. Mr.
John Ellsworth, a Marine Environmental Scientist experienced in coastal zone
management, will serve as Project Manager. Ms. Wendy Salvati, Senior Planner, will
be responsible for issues relating to shoreline mapping and planning. Ms. Laura
.
Schwanof, RLA, an Environmental Scientist formerly affiliated with the U.S. Soil
Conservation Service, will assist on issues relating to erosion and shoreline resources.
Both Ms. Salvati and Ms. Schwanof were primary participants in CA's LWRP work for
.
South old. Engineering expertise will be provided by: Mr. John Guidi, PE, LS, Coastal
Engineer with extensive experience in Long Island's East End, including various Corps
of Engineers' projects; Mr. James Gladysz, PE, who has been responsible for planning
.
and design of numerous erosion and flood control projects; and Mr. Francis Ribaudo,
PE, who recently served as Project Manager for erosion control projects in Oyster Bay.
Mapping will be performed by CA's in-house CADD and mapping group.
.
Personnel from First Coastal will include Aram Terchunian and Walter Bundy, who will
address specific technical issues for the project. Both are well known specialists with
.
extensive experience in addressing erosion control issues on Long Island. CA and First
Coastal have the professional and support staff to commit to this assignment, and to
complete it within the required March 31, 1995 timeframe. CA's prior experience in
the Town of Southold and the technical expertise of both CA and First Coastal will
.
provide substantial advantages to effective and efficient completion of the work. The
CASHIN ASSOCIATES. P.c.
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
SECTION 1
.
.
.
.
team's coastal zone work in eastern Suffolk County, and specifically in Southold, will
.
also provide us with a substantial head-start for this assignment.
Summarv of Work Prol!ram
.
CA has prepared a work program which meets the technical objectives of the Town's
RFP, within the given schedule and budgetary constraints. The program will result in
the preparation of a Local Erosion Management Plan which will serve as an integral
.
component of the Town's overall Local Waterfront Revitalization program. The
program will include the development of a working relationship between Town and
Department State Officials which will help assure that both Town and State objectives
.
are met. Section 2 of this Proposal contains a discussion of our work plan. Items
listed in the RFP which we feel are not necessary to accomplish as part of this
program, given the budgetary and schedule limitations, are identified and discussed.
.
Overall, our work program will provide for a cooperative effort between CA, the Town
and the Department of State to prepare an Erosion Management Plan which will serve
as a policy document for dealing with important flooding and erosion issues in the
.
Town of Southold.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C.
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
SECTION 1
.
.
.
.
.
~\
>S\
Section Two
Proposed Work Program
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
SECTION 2 - PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
.
PART A - TOWN-WIDE PLAN
.
The work performed under this part of the project will be compiled into a stand-alone
report (including maps, as specified herein) that will be titled "Town of Southold Local
Erosion and Floodinl! Manal!ement Plan". That report will also comprise the local
erosion and flooding management component of the Town's Local Waterfront
.
Revitalization Program (LWRP).
Task A 1 - Description of Coastal Geolol!ic Processes
.
Completion of this task and Task A2 will provide a comprehensive inventory of existing
environmental conditions. This information is essential to all subsequent tasks in the
.
program.
Under Task Al, the CAlFCC team will review existing documents, including the current
.
draft LWRP, to develop a description of the coastal morphology in each of the ten sub-
areas of the Town's local waterfront area. Important natural coastal features (i.e.,
beaches, dunes, bluffs, inlets, wetlands, barrier landforms, and rocky shorelines) have
.
been mapped for the draft LWRP at a scale of 1 :24,000, and will not be remapped for
this project. These existing maps (which also show the boundaries of the ten sub-
areas) will be reproduced for inclusion in the subject erosion and flooding management
report, and the information contained in these maps will be incorporated into the
.
written program.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
.
The CAlFCC team will also provide an overview of coastal processes, as they apply to
the shoreline of the Town of Southold. Included in this discussion will be a description
of the geologic processes involved in the formation and evolution of the natural coastal
features enumerated above, especially with regard to sediment transport. The effect
that factors such as wind and wave characteristics, storms, tides, and currents have on
.
sediment transport patterns will also be discussed, both in terms of the lateral
movement of sediment along the shore and on-shore/off-shore transport. The influence
of long-term sea level rise on coastal processes will also be addressed.
.
.
The importance of each of the previously listed natural coastal features will be defined
with respect to its ability to abate coastal erosion and flooding. Factors that enhance
or diminish the mitigative value of each feature will also be discussed. The impact of
hardened shoreline structures and "soft" protection measures, in particular, will be
addressed.
.
The overall effect that severe storms have had on the shoreline in the Town of
Southold will be described in general terms, based on existing documents and
.
discussions with knowledgeable Town officials. Both hurricanes and extratropical
storms (particularly northeasters) will be discussed.
.
In order to make the information presented in the Local Erosion and Floodine
Manaeement Plan understandable to Town officials and to the general public, the
CA/FCC team will create a glossary of technical terms, which will be an attachment
at the end of the report.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
Task A2 - Inventory of Erosion-Prone and Flood-Prone Areas
.
Sub-task 1 - Land Use Patterns in Erosion-Prone and Flood-Prone Areas
Under this sub-task, the CAlFCC team will provide an overview of the current land
.
uses in the coastal zone of the Town of Southold, based on maps included in the draft
LWRP, the latest NYSDEC coastal erosion maps, the FEMA flood maps, maps available
from the Suffolk County Water Authority, and aerial photographs available from the
.
Town. This discussion will be organized into subsections for the ten LWRP sub-areas.
The concepts of "at-risk development" and "development potential" in erosion-prone
and flood-prone areas will be defined with respect to factors such as coastal
.
morphology, coastal processes, shoreline structures, and dredging and dredged material
disposal (especially beach nourishment).
.
The amount of development at-risk to coastal erosion and flooding within the Town,
as well as the development potential for vacant lands within erosion-prone and flood-
prone areas, will be defined usinl! in-kind services provided by the Town Planninl!
.
Department. The following is an outline of the proposed methodology to be
undertaken by Town personnel, as overseen directly by the CAlFCC team. The CAlFCC
team will attend informal meetings and will be available for telephone consultation, as
.
needed, to facilitate this work.
a) The amount of development at-risk to coastal erosion will be estimated by
superimposing the boundary of the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area (CEHA, as
.
delineated on the official New York State map) on the aerial photographs. The
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
actual number of primary structures within the CEHA will be counted for each
.
of the ten sub-areas.
b)
The amount of development at-risk to coastal floodinl! will be estimated by
superimposing the V zone and A zone boundaries (as delineated on the FEMA
.
Flood Insurance Rate Maps) on the aerial photographs. The actual number of
primary structures within the V and A zones will be counted seDarately for each
of the ten sub-areas.
.
.
c) The development potential for vacant lands within erosion-prone and f1ood-
prone areas in the Town will be quantified in each of the ten sub-areas by cross
referencing the working maps produced under items (a) and (b) above with the
Suffolk County tax maps and the zoning map for the Town of Southold. Counts
will be made of the number of vacant tax lots within the CEHA or the flood
.
zone which conform with the zoning requirements of their respective zoning
districts. Existing tax lots for which development would require special action
by the Town, such as variances due to substandard size or dimensions, would
.
not be counted. Lots which would require subdivision approval would be
counted separately, since these would require discretionary approval; as
compared to straight building permits, which are considered ministerial
.
approvals and generally afford the Town little or no discretionary authority. V
and A zones will be considered together to simplify this analysis.
.
In cooperation with the Town, the CAlFCC team will analyze the information generated
through the work program outlined above and produce a tabular data summary and
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
a synopsis of findings.
.
Based on the working maps generated by the Town, the CA/FCC team will produce a
series of maps at 1 :24,000 scale for inclusion in the report depicting the extent of
.
current development and the development potential of vacant lands in erosion-prone
and flood-prone areas.
Sub-task 2 - Identification of Critical Areas of Erosion and Flooding
.
Although all erosion-prone and flood-prone areas (as identified through the analysis of
CEHA maps and FIRMs specified under Sub-task 1) are clearly at-risk to coastal storm
.
damage, certain portions of the Town's shoreline have historically experienced a
relatively larger degree of impact. The work outlined under this sub-task will define
those areas that are presently experiencing critical erosion and flooding problems and
.
which, therefore, require the most immediate attention under the Town's Erosion and
Floodinl! Manal!ement Plan.
.
Under this sub-task, the CA/FCC team will review historic maps, charts, and aerial
photographs (as collected usinl! in-kind services provided bv the Town Planninl!
Department) to identify areas that have experienced critical erosion. The role that
.
shoreline structures and other human activities have played in the occurrence of
erosion in each critical area will be defined. Areas where natural coastal processes
have been dominant in the evolution of the existing shoreline configuration will also
.
be identified and described. The existing information contained in the draft LWRP will
be used as a starting point for this analysis. Interviews with knowledgeable individuals
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES. P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
in the Town will provide supplemental, anecdotal information.
.
The identification of areas of critical floodinl! will be based on existing documents and
information provided during interviews with knowledgeable individuals.
.
The critical erosion and flooding areas in the Town identified under this sub-task will
be depicted on the maps generated under Task 1, if feasible. If those maps would
become too cluttered with this additional information, a second set of maps will be
.
created at an appropriate scale.
Sub-task 3 - Current Coastal Erosion and Flooding Laws and Regulations
.
Under this sub-task, the CAlFCC team will review and summarize pertinent laws and
regulations enacted on the Federal, State and local level which address erosion and
.
flooding management. This will include the FEMA flood zone regulations (as
implemented through Chapter 46, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Town Code), the
NYSDEC model flood damage prevention law (July 1993), the Federal Coastal Barrier
.
Resources Act (as it applies to certain areas on Fishers Island), the New York State
CEHA regulations (as implemented through Chapter 37, Coastal Erosion Hazard Areas,
of the Town Code), and the zoning law and other applicable chapters of the Town
Code.
.
Task A3 - Primarv Town-wide Erosion and Floodinl! Issues
.
Under this task, the CAlFCC team will synthesize the results of the inventory compiled
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
under Tasks Al and A2, which will entail the following work.
.
Based on the inventory information, the CAlFCC team will delineate distinct,
geographic erosion and flooding "management units". Each such unit will
.
comprise all of the coastline segments within the Town that are subject to a
given set of erosion and flooding problems and which, therefore, would be
targeted for a common set of management objectives.
.
Using the L1SCMP erosion and flooding policy (Policy 5), and in consultation
with Town and State officials, the CAlFCC team will define the specific erosion
and flooding management objectives that would be applied to each of the
.
management units. The objectives that would be considered include:
(a) following a hierarchy of management approaches in order of decreasing
priority from avoidance of construction in coastal hazard areas and relocation
.
of structures at-risk, to the planting of stabilizing vegetation along the shoreline,
to the use of "soft" measures (e.g., beach nourishment, artificial dunes and
wetlands, etc.) and, finally, to the installation of hard protective structures;
.
(b) protecting and, where possible, restoring natural protective features;
(c) maintaining and, where possible, restoring natural coastal processes;
(d) maintaining public ownership of public lands in hazard areas; (e) managing
.
dredging and dredge spoil disposal programs in a manner that minimizes erosion
.
and flooding impacts; (f) limiting public investment for coastal erosion and
flooding management only to those projects which would render a
proportionate public benefit; and (g) amending building codes to minimize
damage due to coastal storms.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
Task A4 - Erosion and Floodinl! Policy and Imolementation Techniques
.
Sub-task 1 - Refinement of L1SCMP Erosion and Flooding Policy
Under this sub-task, the CAlFCC team will revise and refine Policy 5 of the L1SCMP for
.
application to erosion and flooding management in the Town of Southold. The
amended policy statement will contain specific, Town-wide standards (and sub-policies,
as applicable) to reflect the management objectives developed under Task A3 for each
.
of the management units.
Sub-task 2 - Implementation Measures
.
Under this sub-task, the CA/FCC team will evaluate the efficacy of existing laws and
regulations in mitigating erosion and flooding problems in the Town. On the basis of
.
that analysis, the CA/FCC team will develop a list of recommendations for improving
current laws and regulations to enhance the degree of erosion and flooding protection.
Consultation with appropriate Town and State officials will be conducted to ensure that
.
the recommendations are realistic and feasible.
Task A5 - Post Storm Recovery Plan
.
Under this task, the CAlFCC team will draft a Town-wide, post-storm recovery strategy,
based on the policies and objectives that are formulated under Tasks Al through A4,
and in consultation with appropriate Town and State officials, and in consideration of
.
the FEMA Hazard Mitigation Survey (974-DR-NY) and the findings of the Governor's
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
.
Coastal Erosion Task Force. The strategy will be specific to each of the management
units defined under Task A3.
The development of a post-storm recovery strategy will take into account the unique
opportunity that may be presented in the aftermath of a catastrophic storm to correct
.
certain pre-existing problems. In particular, an assessment will be made to determine
which management units should be allowed to undergo full redevelopment, which
should be targeted for the relocation of storm-damaged structures out of the hazard
.
area, and which may be appropriate for redevelopment with certain limitations.
Guidelines for evaluating emergency shoreline protection works will also be developed.
.
Wherever the lack of adequate factual information precludes the completion of certain
specific aspects of the post-storm recovery plan, the information gap will be defined,
and a program of future study to correct the deficiency will be recommended. Various
.
agencies (e.g., U.S. Army Corps of Enginet'rs, FEMA, NYSDEC, the New York State Sea
Grant Institute) will be consulted to determine the scope of future investigations that
would be needed.
.
The existing intergovernmental management structure that applies to post-storm
.
emergency response in the Town of Southold will be defined usinl! in-kind services
Drovided bv the Town Planninl! Department. This includes a review of governmental
assistance programs for property owners in disaster areas, as well as regulatory
.
programs that govern post-storm reconstruction (especially with regard to provisions
for "emergency" permitting). Deficiencies in individual programs and in the level of
coordination among the various programs will be identified, and recommendations to
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
correct these problems will be formulated.
.
Task A6 - Recommended Proiects
.
Under this task, the CAlFCC team will identify specific projects that would advance the
policies and objectives of the program, as established under Tasks A3 and A4. A
preliminary cost estimate and possible funding sources will be identified for each
project, as well as the possible need for long-term phasing. Consultation with
.
appropriate Town and State officials will be conducted to ensure that the proposed
projects are realistic and feasible.
.
The CA/FCC team will define the need for long-term permits from NYSDEC andlor the
.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to undertake the proposed projects. In consultation with
the Department of State and other appropriate agencies, the CA/FCC team will also
identify the resources that will be needed for the implementation of the proposed
Erosion and Floodim! Manal!ement Prol!ram, including: future requirements for
research, monitoring, and mapping (in consultation with the New York State Sea Grant
.
Institute); available sources of funds to finance projects, such as Federal and State
monies (and the cost sharing provisions that apply to these monies), and the formation
of taxing districts to encompass property owners in affected areas; and pertinent
.
technical assistance from local, State, and Federal agencies.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
Task A7 - Public Education Recommendations
.
Under this task, the CAlFCC team will develop recommendations for a public education
and outreach project program to raise the level of awareness regarding coastal hazards
and, thereby reduce the amount of property at risk to those hazards. The public
.
education recommendations will stress hierarchy of management options (i.e.,
avoidance> vegetation> soft measures> hard structures) as well as the Town's other
coastal erosion and flooding management objectives.
.
.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
. SECTION 2
.
.
.
PART B - EROSION MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SHORELINE REACH #2
.
The work performed by the Project Team of CA and FCC under this part of the project
.
will be compiled into a stand-alone section of the report (including maps, as specified
herein) that will be titled "Town of Southold Detailed Erosion Manal!ement Plan for the
Duck Pond Point to Horton Point Shoreline Reach".
The investigation of reach #2 will be based on the analysis of this reach completed in
.
Part A (Tasks A1 -A7), a review of existing maps, air photos, other documents available
from the Town, and site inspections.
.
TASK 81 - Identification of Erosion. Accretion and Stability Areas
Completion of this Task will provide a determination of the approximate rates of
.
erosion and accretion over the specified time periods, with emphasis on the impact of
existing shore protection structures. The approximate rates of erosion and accretion
will be determined utilizing available aerial photographs and NYS DEC coastal erosion
.
maps (as collected usinl! in-kind services provided by the Town Planninl! Departmentl,
and determining stable reference points which will be used to measure the erosion and
accretion of the transient beach.
.
As part of this Task a description of the methodology used to determine the
approximate rates of erosion and accretion will be provided including an assessment
of the accuracy of the calculated rates.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
The areas of unstable shoreline will be identified in a tabular data summary including
the distance each of these unstable shoreline areas has moved landward or seaward
.
over the specified periods of time and the rate of erosion or rate of accretion for that
particular area. The areas identified in the tabular data summary will be keyed to a
map showing the areas of erosion and accretion.
.
A discussion of the relative contribution of incident coastal processes to the measured
shoreline erosion will also be provided as part of this Task.
.
TASK 82 - Review of Shoreline Development
.
This task will provide an evaluation of the land use and development in areas adjacent
to the shoreline in this reach based on the information provided by the in-kind services
of the Town Planninl! Department identified in Part A (Task A2).
.
The information provided in Part A (Task A2) will be analyzed in cooperation with the
Town and a review of public and private land use practices in the reach which directly
influence land stability relative to shoreline erosion will be provided along with a
.
determination of developed shoreline parcels which would be seriously impacted by
continued shoreline flooding and erosion.
.
A tabular data summary will be provided usinl! in-kind services of the Town Planninl!
Department identifying each of the shore protection structures within the reach and
.
providing a general description including the location, age, size, type of construction,
ownership of the structure, land ownership, permit history, and general condition of
each structure.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
.
TASK B3 - Identification of Direction of Littoral Drift & Sediment TransDort Variations
This task will provide an identification of the direction of littoral drift, the net volumes
of sediment transported in the longshore direction, annual variations in the longshore
.
sediment transport where possible, and the sediment sources and sinks.
.
A sediment budget analysis will be provided addressing the reach as a whole and the
following sub-reaches identified below:
Sub-reach 1. Duck Pond Point to Goldsmith Inlet
.
Sub-reach 2. Goldsmith Inlet to Bittner Groin
Sub-reach 3. Bittner Groin to western most Lockman Groin
Sub-reach 4. Lockman Groin field
.
Sub-reach 5. Kenny's Beach (eastern most Lockman groin to Kenny Rd)
Sub-reach 6. Horton Beach (Kenny Rd to Horton pt)
.
A tabular data summary will be provided based on the physical shoreline changes
identified in Tasks 81 and B2, and calculations based on historical maps and aerial
photographs (as collected usinl! in-kind services provided bv the Town Planninl!
.
DeDartmenO. Existing data, studies and information will be accessed and analyzed via
the ACES computer software developed by the US Army Corps of Engineers for coastal
engineering. Littoral drift maps including littoral drift directions, sediment budget and
.
bathymetric information will be provided for comparison to the tabular data summary
and to identify the sub-reaches included in the summary.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
TASK 84 - Determine Impact of Shore Structures
.
Under this task a simple sediment budget would be prepared identifying the quantities
of sediment into and out of the entire reach and each of the sub-reaches identified in
Task 83, for only the current time frame, including all data from 1984 through the
.
present.
The approximate rates of erosion and accretion will be determined utilizing available
.
aerial photographs (as collected usinl! in-kind services provided by the Town Planninl!
Department), and will be compared to the location of the shoreline structures and the
sediment budgets developed in Tasks 81, 82 and 83 to determine the relative impact
.
of the identified structures.
TASK 85 - Assessment of Shoreline Conditions
.
.
This task will provide an assessment of the condition of the shoreline in the reach,
focusing on the beaches adjacent to each of the shore perpendicular and shore parallel
structures within the reach.
The assessment will be based on the information developed in Tasks 81-84 and will
.
address the impact of major (significant) shore protection structures within the reach.
.
The assessment provided will be complimented by a map indicating the anticipated
future shoreline development conditions prepared, utilizing the maps prepared for the
Town's Draft LWRP, and will indicate the anticipated impact of each major shore
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
protection structure within the reach.
.
TASK 86 - Identification of Options - Shoreline Erosion Problems
This Task will identify options available to the Town for addressing erosion, including
.
non-structural, soft-structural, and hard structural methods. The task will be based on
the general reach analysis completed in Tasks A3-A6 and the specific reach information
.
developed in Tasks 81-85, will address the positive and negative impacts of each
option, and will identify appropriate timing for implementation of options.
The options identified for the shoreline erosion problems will include an evaluation of
.
the effectiveness of modifying the existing shore protection structures as an erosion
control method, to restore the natural sediment transport in the area. The evaluation
will be based on an analysis of identified potential impacts which would occur in the
.
reach based on existing simple model studies and available case histories provided
usinl! in-kind services Drovided bv the Town Planninl! Department.
.
The evaluation of non-structural approaches will identify opportunities available to the
Town for relocation, acquisition, regulatory changes, zoning changes, fiscal expenditure
changes, and various incentives and disincentives to influence current development
.
practices and existing land use in the specified reach, and a discussion of appropriate
post-storm approaches for the reach area will be provided. The opportunities
identified will include those projects recommended in Task A6 which are appropriate
for the reach including, structural, beach renourishment, armoring and offshore
.
breakwaters.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES. p,c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
TASK 87 - Short and Lon!! Term Mana!!ement Recommendations
.
This Task will develop recommendations for the short and long term management of
this section of shoreline including the adjacent parcels, based on an evaluation of the
existing conditions and future trends as developed in the general reach analysis
.
performed.
The recommendations addressed will include all available options including,
.
modification of existing shore protection structures, and structural and non-structural
alternatives. Under this task, the recommendations will be prepared in consultation
with appropriate Town and State officials to ensure that the recommendations are
.
realistic and feasible.
The recommendations provided will include an explanation of the type option
.
presented, including an estimated cost for construction and maintenance as
.
appropriate, and a discussion of the positive and negative impacts. The effect of
typical coastal conditions and severe storm events will be addressed. The procedure(s)
which the Town should follow for implementation will not be addressed by this task.
This task is recommended to be completed at a later date when subsequent funds are
available.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
Meetings
.
The CAlFCC team will attend two public meetings for the purpose of gathering public
input and presenting the draft plan to the public. In addition, three to four joint
meetings with the Town and NYSDOS will be held to finalize the work program and
.
discuss project progress. It is also anticipated that a number of informal meetings with
Town representatives will also be required during the course of work on this project
to obtain information needed for the Local Erosion and Flooding Management Program.
.
All such information gathering meetings necessary to complete this plan are included
.
in this proposal. Meetings with the Town Waterfront Advisory Committee, outside
parties, andlor individual community groups will be handled by the Town and the
information generated at these meetings will be forwarded to the CAlFCC team.
Submissions and Schedule
.
.
By March 1, 1995, in accordance with the specifications of the RFP, the CAlFCC team
will submit a preliminary draft copy of the Local Erosion Flooding Management
Program (prepared using WordPerfect 5.1) for review and comment by the Town and
NYSDOS. Five preliminary draft copies of the report would be provided to the Town
for review. The Town and State shall each provide one set consolidated set of
.
comments to the CA/FCC team for responsive action.
Based on the comments on the preliminary draft report received from the Town and
State, and generated during the public meeting held in March of 1995, the CAlFCC
.
team will prepare a final draft report. This final draft will include the comments
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
generated from the preliminary draft report. The scheduled delivery of the final
.
document will be March 31, 1995, at which time five copies of the final draft report,
including associated maps, and a 3.5 inch floppy disk containing the report in
WordPerfect 5.1 format will be provided, to the Town, as set forth in the RFP.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM
SECTION 2
.
.
.
.
Jia
~~\
~ ,>"
M' __ ~~
Section Three
- . - -
QuaCiJlcations and EKperience
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
SECTION 3 - QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
.
Overview of Corporate Qualifications
Cashin Associates, P.c. (CA) is a multi-disciplinary engineering and
.
environmental consulting firm which has been providing professional services
throughout the region since 1959. The firm offers a wide range of services
including:
.
.
. coastal zone management studies
. environmental consulting and permitting
. civil and site engineering
. architectural design
. electrical/mechanical engineering
. construction inspection
. environmental audits
. building inspections/site assessments
. solid waste management
. insurance investigations/construction claims analysis
. wastewater management and environmental engineering
. tank management and design services
. hazardous material management studies
. roadway/highway design and inspection
. traffic and transportation engineering
. landscape architecture
. CADD and computer services
I~
.
.
CA is staffed with approximately 80 engineers, environmental scientists,
.
planners, architects, inspectors, surveyors and other technical support
personnel. With offices in Suffolk and Putnam Counties, New York, Woodcliff
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
.
.
Lake, New Jersey, and Miami, Florida, CA is active throughout the eastern
.
United States. The firm also provides inspections and other specialized services
throughout the nation.
.
Coastal Zone Planninl! Services
CA has provided extensive services in the preparation of coastal zone
.
management programs, local waterfront revitalization plans, harbor plans and
other coastal and marine studies. The firm has full in-house capabilities in the
planning and environmental disciplines required for this work. CA's staff
.
includes planners, environmental scientists, marine scientists, geologists, zoning
and land use specialists, coastal and civil engineers, and mapping specialists.
CA's engineering divisions provide support services in coastal engineering,
.
transportation planning and civil engineering, as necessary. CA's coastal zone
experience also includes numerous projects involving tidal wetlands, marine
resources, dredging and dredged material disposal, coastal erosion control, flood
.
hazard areas, and water quality.
CA assisted the Town of Brookhaven on the preparation of a comprehensive
.
town-wide local waterfront revitalization program. More recently, we have
assisted the Town with site specific improvement plans for various Town
.
shorefront parks and marinas. CA has undertaken the preparation of waterfront
revitalization programs for the Towns of Southold, Islip, Huntington, and North
Hempstead, and the Villages of Lloyd Harbor, Port Jefferson and Sag Harbor,
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
.
.
.
NY. CA has also prepared a Generic Environmental Impact Statement for a
waterfront development plan for Oyster Bay Harbor, an embayment with
important fishery, commercial and recreational resources on Long Island's North
.
Shore. CA recently prepared a draft harbor management plan for Oyster Bay
Harbor, and we are presently assisting the Village of Port Jefferson in
developing its harbor management plan. These projects involved the inventory
and analysis of a wide range of environmental conditions, including erosion
control, ecological resources, recreational facilities, existing land use, water
.
supply, surface/groundwater quality, endangered species habitat,
commercial/residential uses, and economics.
.
CA has prepared a comprehensive plan and environmental study of the Barrier
Beach and Bay Island Communities on the South Shore in the Town of Babylon,
NY. The project involved the analyses of recreational usage of coastal areas
.
and other recreational facilities, and addressed complex issues relating to water
quality, wetlands and coastal erosion. CA recently completed technical studies
on erosion control and shoreline management for the New York State
.
Department of State relating to the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force
.
Management Plan. The firm has initiated technical studies as part of the
Peconic Estuary Program being conducted for the Suffolk County Department
of Health Services and the u.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFICATlONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
.
.
Waterfront and Coastal Enl!ineerinl! Exoerience
.
CA's engineering design group is well experienced in the planning, design and
permitting of waterfront structures, including erosion control facilities, beaches,
parks, marinas, fishing piers, and other recreational facilities. These projects
.
have included the development of master plans for coastal engineering and
shorefront projects. CA has also worked on the design and permitting of
seawalls, bulkheads, docks, marinas, and dredge material disposal areas. CA's
.
structural and civil engineers have extensive experience in the design of
waterfront and marine structures. The staff is further strengthened by several
on-staff marine scientists who have specific backgrounds in the environmental
.
aspects of construction in coastal areas. CA's landscape architectural group is
experienced in site work for shoreline parks and other developments.
Recent CA projects have included engineering and environmental services for
.
channel dredging, erosion control and beach nourishment projects for
municipalities on Long Island, NY. CA has also provided design and inspection
services for construction of bulkheads, jetties, marinas and related structures for
.
various public and private clients. CA's environmental and planning divisions
have prepared coastal zone management plans for extensive areas of the New
York shoreline, including both undeveloped and port areas. CA has performed
.
numerous site specific studies of coastal wetlands, sensitive habitats, marine
ecosystems and water quality. CA's environmental division also provides permit
application services for waterfront and coastal engineering projects, and the
.
staff is highly knowledgeable of the permits and approvals required from the
local, county, state and federal agencies.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUAlFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
.
.
The project experience summarized above has helped to make the CA staff
.
extremely familiar with the shoreline of Southold Town, and the environmental,
flooding and erosion control issues associated with the Town's coastal zone. CA
is aware of the sources of existing information which are available, as well as
.
the governmental and scientific organizations which can provide relevant data
and technical input. As a local firm involved in Long Island coastal zone
management, CA has a realistic knowledge of the types of policies and
.
administrative procedures that are utilized for erosion and flooding control.
.
Proiect Experience - Waterfront Planninl!
PROJECT:
Client:
.
Services:
.
.
.
.
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION
PROGRAM
Town of Southold, Southold, New York
Assistance to the Town in preparing a waterfront management
plan and GElS for the Town's coastal zone, which included 163
linear miles of diverse shoreline on Peconic Bay, Gardiners Bay
and Long Island Sound. CA provided comprehensive inventories
and mapping of existing environmental conditions including
critical habitats, recreational facilities, wetlands, residential/
commercial developments, and other factors. Important issues
included water quality of coastal waters, coastal erosion,
dredging, public access and recreation, and protection of shellfish
resources. The project included identification of inlets, channels,
marina basins and other marine areas requiring dredging, existing
disposal sites, and analysis of State Coastal Zone Management
Policies relating to dredging.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALflCATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
PROJECT:
..
Client:
Services:
.
.
PROJECT:
Client:
.
Services:
.
.
.
.
.
MIAMOGUE POINT WETLAND/EROSION CONTROL STUDIES,
JAMES PORT, NEW YORK
Town of Riverhead, Riverhead, New York
Planning and environmental studies relating to erosion control,
beach nourishment and channel dredging for an area along
Peconic Bay. CA conducted a detailed ecological study of a
valuable tidal wetland and wildlife habitat threatened by shoreline
erosion. Alternative actions and costs for erosion control were
investigated. Coordination and consultation with New York State
and local officials included in CA's responsibilities.
WADING RIVER DREDGING AND BEACH RESTORATION
PROJECT, WADING RIVER, NEW YORK
Town of Riverhead, Riverhead, New York
Planning and environmental services for dredging of a navigable
waterway and restoration of an adjacent public beach subject to
erosion. CA designed and supervised dredging and beach
nourishment programs to restore a navigable channel and provide
enhancement to eroded shoreline areas with residential homes.
Preservation of sensitive wetlands and marine habitats adjacent to
the sites was critical aspect of CA's involvement. CA was also
responsible for acquisition of permits from the NYSDEC, Corp of
. Engineers, and NYS Department of State.
TOWN-WIDE
PROGRAM
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION
Town of Brookhaven, Brookhaven, New York
Preparation of a waterfront revitalization and management
program and GElS for the Town's coastal zone, which consists of
over 100 linear miles of shoreline including barrier beach, open
ocean, bays, wetlands and developed shorelines. CA conducted
detailed inventories of existing environmental conditions,
proposed development, and potential environmental impacts.
Technical areas included water quality, ecology, wetlands, land
use/zoning, cultural resources, dredging and spoil disposal,
residential/ commercial development and development potential.
Work involved close coordination with N.Y. State and local
governmental agencies. The project included identification of
inlets, channels, marina basins and other marine areas requiring
dredging, existing disposal sites, problems associated with
dredging, and analysis of State Coastal Zone Management Policies
relating to dredging.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
.
PROJECT:
Client:
.
Services:
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
.
.
.
.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF HAZARD MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
FOR LONG ISLAND COASTAL ZONE
New York State Department of State, Albany, New York
Technical analysis to evaluate alternative long term strategies for
management of specific Long Island marine coastal areas subject
to erosion and flooding hazards. The study is being done as part
of the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force, implemented in re-
sponse to storm damage incurred during 1992-93. The study
involves an analysis of various erosion control and shorefront
stabilization alternatives and their costs to construct and maintain.
ANALYSIS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONAL
ARRANGEMENTS FOR COASTAL HAZARD PLANNING, NEW
YORK COASTAL MARINE ZONE
New York State Department of State, Albany, New York
Detailed review and analysis of existing organizations, regulatory
authorities and program responsibilities for selected local
governments in study area relating to land use and development
planning, regulation and emergency response to coastal flooding
and erosion.
MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT FOR DREDGING AND DREDGED MATERIAL
DISPOSAL, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works, Yaphank, New York
Comprehensive ecological and environmental analyses and long-
term plan for County-wide dredging program, including
investigation/analysis of biological and ecological resources for
approximately 150 locations. Inventories of rare/endangered
species, wetlands and sensitive habitats included. Use of dredged
materials for erosion control and beach nourishment is an
important issue addressed in the study.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
.
PROJECT:
Client:
.
Services:
.
.
PROJECT:
Client:
Services:
.
.
.
.
.
PECONIC ESTUARY PROGRAM SUBMERGED AQUATIC
VEGETATION STUDY
Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Riverhead, NY
CA has been selected as one of the main consultants on the
Peconic Estuary Program. CA is conducting a detailed study of
submerged aquatic vegetation and other resources in the Peconic
Estuary and its ecological importance to the ecology of the
Peconic Estuary. CA's work includes a detailed field survey of
seagrass distribution and abundance, and the development of a
plan to enhance the ecological and recreational resources of the
bay.
DRAFT HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OYSTER BAY
HARBOR
Town of Oyster Bay, Oyster Bay, New York
Development of a draft comprehensive plan for management of
Oyster Bay Harbor and its marine and coastal resources. Issues
addressed in the plan include water quality protection,
recreational usage, wetland preservation, special habitats,
commercial shellfishing, dredging and spoil disposal needs, and
designated areas for recreational boat mooring. The plan involved
a detailed inventory of the bay's resources including water
quality, sediments, shellfish abundance, wetland distribution,
wildlife habitats, and recreational/visual resources.
PORT JEFFERSON HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN
Village of Port Jefferson, New York
Assistance to the Village in preparing policies for Harbor
Management for Port Jefferson Harbor, a north shore embayment
with important commercial, recreational, scenic and ecological
resources. CA is presently preparing a harbor and shorefront plan
for the Village.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFlCATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
.
.
.
.
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PLAN FOR VILLAGE OF
LLOYD HARBOR
Village of Lloyd Harbor, Lloyd Harbor, New York
Inventory of existing coastal resources including wildlife habitats,
recreational facilities and land uses, and preparation of a coastal
zone management plan for the Village.
TOWN OF HUNTINGTON
REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
LOCAL
WATERFRONT
Town of Huntington, Huntington, New York
Preparation of a GElS and waterfront management plan for the
Town's coastal zone, which consists of shoreline areas along
Huntington Harbor, Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island Sound, and
associated inlets and creeks. CA's work has included detailed
inventories of existing environmental conditions including
wetlands, water quality, land use, critical habitats and cultural
resources. Important issues addressed included: development
potential, dredging and spoil disposal, and preservation of
ecological resources and habitats.
TOWN OF NORTH HEMPSTEAD LOCAL WATERFRONT
REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
Town of North Hempstead, Manhasset, New York
Assistance to Town in preparation of a waterfront revitalization
management plan and GElS for the Town's coastal zone, which
includes developed harbors, wetlands and undeveloped areas.
Primary issues have included water quality of embayments, water-
dependent uses of the shoreline, and public access. CA has
provided technical assistance on all aspects of the plan, including
detailed inventories of existing environmental resources and land
use.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
PROJECT:
Client:
.
Services:
.
.
PROJECT:
Client:
.
Services:
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
.
.
.
.
TOWN OF ISlIP LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION
PROGRAM
Town of Islip, Islip, New York
Technical and planning assistance to the Town in preparing the
Town's waterfront and coastal zone management plan in
accordance with New York State and local requirements. CA
specifically assisted in coastal zone issues relating to land use and
proposed coastal improvement projects, in preparation of
basemaps of existing/future environmental conditions, and in
organizing the plan in format required by New York State. CAts
work involved detailed inventories of the Town's shoreline,
including the channels, canals and marinas on Great South Bay.
BARRIER AND BAY ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY AND
PLAN
Town of Babylon, Lindenhurst, New York and New York State
Department of State, Albany, New York
Comprehensive study of the shoreline environment and
communities, and identification of environmental impacts and
mitigation for sensitive coastal areas in the Town of Babylon.
CAts work included detailed recreational analysis, inventory and
assessment of existing data relating to coastal bird, shellfish/finfish
distribution, wetlands, water quality, coastal erosion, and
dredging/beach nourishment needs and practices in the area.
GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE
OYSTER BAY SHORELINE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
Town of Oyster Bay, Oyster Bay, New York
Preparation of a Generic Environmental Impact Statement and
technical studies for Oyster Bay Harbor Redevelopment plan.
Project involved a comprehensive evaluation of environmental and
socioeconomic conditions surrounding the harbor, and important
residential, commercial and historic areas. Main issues addressed
included preservation of water quality in the bay, which includes
a national wildlife preserve and commercially valuable shellfish
resources. CA conducted a detailed analysis of contamination
threats to water quality and shellfish as technical support to the
EIS. Analysis included resolution of conflicting uses of the harbor
including shoreline development, residential use, recreation and
habitat protection.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
.
.
.
VILLAGE OF SAG HARBOR HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN AND
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
Village of Sag Harbor, New York
CA is preparing a harbor plan and waterfront reviaatlization plan
for Sag Harbor, and importnat Village, historic and harbor district
on Long Island's South Shore. The project involves detailed
inventories of existing environmental, recreational and
commercial resources of the harbor, and the identification of
conflicting uses and isses associated with the harbor and
shoreline, including protection of water quality, wetland
preservation, shoreline development, navigation, erosion control,
flooding, and aesthetics.
Proiect Experience - Shorefront and Recreational Site ImDrovements
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
.
STEHLl/RANSOM BEACH RECONSTRUCTION AND EROSION
CONTROL, BAYVILLE, NEW YORK
Town of Oyster Bay Department of Public Works, Syosset, New
York
Study, survey and design for reconstruction of popular shorefront
recreational facility severely damaged by winter storms and
erosion. Reconstruction of entrance, parking lot, lighting,
walkways, fencing, erosion control structures and beach required.
Installation of recreational facilities including playground and
picnic areas also included. CA's responsibilities included subtidal
survey, preparation of beach profiles, engineering evaluation of
existing facilities, design, and permit applications.
LANDING AVENUE PARK BULKHEAD AND SITE
IMPROVEMENTS, SMITHTOWN, NEW YORK
Town of Smithtown Department of Environment and Waterways,
Smithtown, New York
Survey, engineering design and inspection for site improvements
to shorefront park including new 200 ft. long bulkhead to replace
highly deteriorated and damaged bulkhead, and for erosion
control. Design of improved drainage system also included. The
park is located at the Nissequogue River estuary on Long Island's
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
.
PROJECT:
Client:
Services:
.
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
.
PROJECT:
Client:
Services:
.
.
.
.
.
MASTER PLAN FOR WADING RIVER BOAT RAMP AND
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK
Town of Riverhead, Riverhead, New York
Submission of Federal and State applications, environmental
assessment and supporting technical data for beach nourishment
and maintenance dredging of a navigational channel in Wading
River, New York, including Corps of Engineers and State permits.
CA supervised the dredging and beach nourishment during the
construction phase. Preparation of Master Plan for site
improvements to boat landing ramp, marina and shore support
facilities included in the project. Project provided for use of
dredged material to reduce erosion on critical beach areas.
MT. SINAI PIER AND BEACH RESTORATION AND REPLACE-
MENT, MT. SINAI, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK
Town of Brookhaven, Medford, New York
Survey, design and construction inspection for major recon-
struction of 400-ft. long fishing pier destroyed by severe winter
storms. Work involved dredging of sand deposited in Mt. Sinai
Channel and deposition for restoration of adjacent beach areas at
Cedar Beach, replacement of aids to navigation including inlet
light, and installation of boardwalks and other facilities for public
access and recreational fishing.
SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO DAVIS PARK MARINA FACILITY
TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK
Town of Brookhaven, Medford, New York
Inspection, damage survey, subsurface surveys, design and
construction supervision for repairs and improvements to
shorefront park and marina with 250 boat capacity. Site
improvements to boardwalks, playground, bathrooms, docks and
bulkhead included. Erosion control for severely damaged beach
included in the project.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
.
PROJECT:
Client:
Services:
.
.
PROJECT:
Client:
.
Services:
.
PROJECT:
Client:
.
.
.
.
.
.
SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BLUE POINT DOCK RECREATIONAL
AREA, BLUE POINT, NEW YORK
Town of Brookhaven, Medford, New York
Inspection, survey, design and construction supervision for repairs
and improvements to shorefront recreational area including
boardwalks, bulkhead, lighting, fencing and fishing pier. Repair
of damage caused by severe winter storms and erosion included
in project.
IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR SEAFORD
HARBOR YACHT CLUB MARINA IMPROVEMENTS
Town of Babylon, Lindenhurst, New York
Inspection of existing conditions, identification of improve-ment
alternatives and cost estimates for upgrading municipal marina
and associated recreational facilities.
HARBOR CLUB MARINA EVALUATION, PORT JEFFERSON
HARBOR, NY
Group II, Port Jefferson, New York
Preparation of and Environmental Impact Statement, permit
acquisition, and environmental studies for development of a
marina, residential complex and public access areas on Port
Jefferson Harbor. CA's services included collection/analysis, land
use/ socioeconomic analyses. Major issues included dredging
needs, visual quality of the shoreline, public access, recreation
and wastewater disposal.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFICATlONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
PROJECT:
.
Client:
Services:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ROOSEVELT MEMORIAL PARK AND MARINA IMPROVEMENTS,
OYSTER BAY, NEW YORK
Town of Oyster Bay, Oyster Bay, New York
Design and construction phase services for ballfield improvements
including lighting, and electricalllighting improvements for
Marina. Engineering services for improvements to fuel storage
systems also provided by CA.
SITE PLANNING AND MARINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
FOR THE LONG ISLAND AQUARIUM, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK
Okeanos Ocean Research Institution, Hampton Bays, NY
Preparation of environmental impact statement, wetland permit
applications, sampling and analysis of surface water quality, and
assessment of potential impacts from the aquarium. CA is also
providing site engineering design services for the project.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES
QUALFICATlONS AND EXPERIENCE
SECTION 3
.
. .
TOWN OF OYSTER BAY
CASHIN ASSOCIATES SERVICES
RANSOM BEACH RECONSTRUCTION
STORM DAMAGE SURVEY &
DESIGN FOR EROSION CONTROL
.
.
.
.
Ransom Beach looking east, showing major loss of beach and
damage to parking and utilities.
.
.
.
.
Ransom Beach looking west, showing loss of beach and
undermining of shoreline.
.
.
. .
TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.e. SERVICES
BLUE POINT AVENUE FISHING PIER
DAMAGE SURVEY & DESIGN FOR RECONSTRUCTION
.
.
.
Blue Point Avenue fishing pier. Looking south.
.
.
.
.
Portion of failing bulkhead and localized erosion.
.
.
. .
TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.e. SERVICES
DAVIS PARK MARINA REPAIRS, FIRE ISLAND N.Y.
DAMAGE SURVEY & DESIGN
FOR REPAIRS & EROSION CONTROL
.
.
.
.
Bayside area, showing severe loss of beach and
exposure of bulkhead deadman system.
.
.
.
Failure of bulkhead at marina.
.
.
VILfAGE OF SAG HAtBOR
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. SERVICES
HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN AND
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
.
.
.
.
Sag Harbor Cove
.
.
.
.
Long Wharf, Downtown Sag Harbor
.
- - -
.
VIL~GE OF LLOYD tfARBOR
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. SERVICES
LOCAL WATERFRONT REVIT ALlZA nON PLAN
.
.
.
Lloyd Harbor
.
.
.
.
Lloyd Harbor
.
.
...--
VILftGE OF PORT JEffERSON
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES P.C. SERVICES
HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN
.
.
.
Bayles Dock - Village of Port Jefferson
.
.
.
.
Wetlands and Shoreline Development
.
.
.
.
l\,
-fC;w
,;g
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
....
.
____. _ MM
Section Four
Project Team
.
.
.
.
SECTION 4 - PROJECT TEAM
.
General Personnel Resources
.
With a staff of approximately 80 engineers, planners, environmental scientists,
architects, construction inspectors and other technical support personnel, Cashin
Associates (CA) has in-house capabilities in the wide variety of disciplines
.
required for the firm's engineering, environmental, planning and construction
supervision projects. The engineering staff includes civil, environmental,
sanitary, mechanical, electrical, transportation and coastal engineers, landscape
.
architects, inspectors, surveyors and technicians. The firm's environmental
personnel have expertise in planning, biology, geology, marine/coastal resources,
land use/zoning, traffic, environmental regulations, solid/hazardous waste
.
management, and socioeconomics. The construction inspection staff, which
consists of licensed engineers and NICET inspectors, has extensive experience
in construction of roadways, bridges, and other public works improvements.
.
The firm also utilizes state-of-the-art CADD systems and full-time CADD
operators for design and mapping services.
.
CA's project teams are selected to meet the specific needs of the assignment.
All work is performed under the direct supervision of experienced and licensed
project managers who adhere to the highest standards in technical quality
control. CA places great importance on maintaining close liaison with the firm's
.
clients, and in completing projects within schedule and budgetary limits.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROJECT TEAM
SECTION 4
.
.
.
.
CA has engineering and environmental personnel with specific expertise in
.
shoreline projects, marine science, coastal resources, and coastal engineering.
These capabilities will be valuable in preparing the Local Erosion Management
Plan for the Town of Southold. CA has the professional and support resources
to complete the work within the time frame required by the Town.
.
First Coastal is a specialized firm in coastal erosion, and its professional staff
consists of recognized experts in the field in this region.
.
Proiect Team
.
Cashin Associates' project team has recent direct experience in preparation of
.
master plans and shorefront planning for municipal clients. Mr. Gregory T.
Greene will serve as Principal-in-Charge. Mr. Greene has directed the previous
environmental and planning work performed by CA for the Town of Southold
LWRP over the last several years, and he has directed the preparation of
numerous other master plans and coastal zone studies throughout Long Island.
.
Mr. John Ellsworth, Senior Environmental Scientist, will serve as Project
.
Manager. He has directed CA's work on coastal planning for the Town of
Oyster Bay, and on technical studies performed for the New York State
Department of State. Planning expertise will be directed by Ms. Wendy Salvati,
Senior Planner, who is a specialist in coastal zone planning, and she has assisted
numerous municipalities in site and shoreline planning in Nassau and Suffolk
Counties. The team will also include Ms. Laura Schwanof, R.L.A., an environ-
.
mental scientist and specialist in soil conservation, erosion control and wetland
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROJECT TEAM
SECTION 4
.
.
.
ecology. She was formerly associated with the Soil Conservation Service before
.
joining CA. Both Ms. Salvati and Ms. Schwanof were primary participants in
CA's previous LWRP work for Southold. Mr. James Gladysz, P.E., Senior Civil
Engineer, has directed engineering evaluations and design for erosion control,
municipal marinas, beaches, shorefront structures, recreational facilities on
.
numerous projects on Long Island, and he has directed the preparation of
Master Plans for shoreline improvements at a variety of sites for the Town of
Brookhaven. Technical expertise will also be provided by Mr. John Guidi, PE,
.
LS, a coastal engineer with over 30 years of experience in erosion, shoreline
construction and dredging in Suffolk County.
.
Principals from First Coastal to be assigned to the project are Mr. Aram
Terchunian, Mr. Walter Bundy, and Mr. Christopher Jones, P.E. They will assist
CA in addressing specific technical issues, and in helping to prepare the overall
.
Erosion Management Plan.
An outline of the project team is as follows.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROJECT TEAM
SECTION 4
.
.
.
PROJECT TEAM
.
Gregory T. Greene Director of Environmental Principal-in-Charge
Programs
. John Ellsworth Senior Environmental Sci- Project Manager
entist
Wendy Salvati Chief Planner Coastal Planning,
Land Use Inventories
James A. Gladysz, PE Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Evaluation,
. Erosion Control
Laura Schwanof, RLA Landscape Architect Erosion Control,
Flood Plain Inventories
John Guidi, PE, LS Senior Coastal Engineer Coastal Engineering, Ero-
sion Control
. Francis D. Ribaudo, PE Principal Civil Engineer Engineering Analyses -
Shoreline Facilities
Robert Pedneault, PE Environmental Engineer Field Inventories, Coastal
Resources Analyses
. Joseph Iannucci CADD Supervisor CADD/Mapping
Lynn Southard Graphic Artist CADD/Mapping
.
Aram Terchunian
President
Erosion/Coastal Processes
& Analyses
Coastal Planning!
Policies Analyses
Sediment Budget
Analyses/Coastal Planning
Walter Bundy
Programs Administrator
.
Christopher Jones, PE
Coastal Engineer
Resumes of Kev Personnel
.
Resumes of key personnel to be assigned to this project follow in this section.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
PROJECT TEAM
SECTION 4
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
.
GREGORY T. GREENE
Director of Environmental Programs
EDUCATION/REGISTRATION
B.A., Geological and Geophysical Sciences, Princeton University, 1975
M.S., Marine Environmental Sciences, SUNY at Stony Brook, 1978
.
EXPERIENCE
.
As Director of Environmental Programs at Cashin Associates, Mr. Greene serves as project
manager for major environmental planning and assessment projects. He has directed the
preparation of numerous environmental impact statements, master plans and technical
studies for coastal zone management and public works projects. He is highly
knowledgeable of local, state, and federal regulatory requirements.
Recent environmental projects completed under Mr. Greene's direction included:
.
. Preparation of a comprehensive environmental study and plan for the barrier
beach and bay islands system in the Town of Babylon, NY.
. Preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Plans for the Towns of Southold,
Brookhaven, North Hempstead and Oyster Bay, NY.
. Environmental/planning studies for the Oyster Bay Harbor Redevelopment Plan,
including technical studies of shellfish and marine resources.
.
. Series of technical studies as part of the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force for
the New York State Department of State.
. Assessment of biological resources at approximately 150 coastal locations in
Suffolk County as part of a Dredging GElS and Master Plan.
.
. Detailed field study and analysis of the distribution of aquatic vegetation as Part
of the Peconic Estuary Program
.
Other recent assignments conducted by Mr. Greene included: area planning studies and
site assessments throughout the northeast for the U.S. Postal Service; various ecological,
marine and coastal zone management studies throughout Long Island; preparation of the
master plan for restoration of Central Park, NY; environmental assessments for utility
installations as part of the restoration of Ellis Island, NY.
.
Mr. Greene was also employed for four years at a national environmental consulting firm
where he was involved in the preparation of environmental impact studies for the U.S.
EPA. He acquired extensive experience in project planning, field work, data analysis, EIS
preparation and expert testimony in this position. He served as project manager for a
major EIS on the proposed remediation of PCB-contaminated sediments from the Hudson
River, and for an assessment of impacts of sewering on marine resources of the Great
South Bay, NY. He prepared EIS's for regional wastewater disposal systems on Long
Island, upstate New York, New Jersey, and Puerto Rico.
.
.
.
.
.
Mr. Greene's specific areas of expertise are coastal geology, marine ecology and coastal
erosion. In addition to his educational training in these fields, he has completed numerous
assignments in these areas as a consultant to various governmental clients. In addition,
he has written numerous technical articles on the geological and biological aspects of long
Island's marine environment. An outline of projects for which Mr. Greene served as Chief
Scientist in the area of coastal/marine studies is given below.
. Impacts of Shoreline Development on Shellfish Resources in lake Montauk, NY --
Town of East Hampton
.
. Distribution of Surficial Sediments and Seagrasses in Eastern Great South Bay, NY
-- New York State Sea Grant Institute
. Estuarine Impact Assessment for Shellfish Resources in Great South Bay, NY -- US
Environmental Protection Agency
.
. Environmental Inventory of the long Beach - Lido Beach Area -- Nassau County
Department of Public Works
. Engineering Analysis of Dredge Spoil Disposal Alternatives, Town of Hempstead,
NY -- US Army Corps of Engineers
.
. EIS for the Hudson River PCB Reclamation/Containment Project -- US
Environmental Protection Agency
. Hard Clams, Competitors, Predators and Physical Parameters in Great South Bay,
NY -- New York State Sea Grant Institute
.
. Coastal Erosion Study for Shoreline Property, East Hampton, NY --
New York State Sea Grant Institute
. Environmental Assessment for Underwater Utility Lines, Restoration of Ellis Island,
NY -- National Park Service
.
. Marine Fisheries Inventory for the Northwestern Atlantic -- National Marine
Fisheries Service
. Population Dynamics of Hard Clams in Great South Bay, NY -- Marine Sciences
Research Center, Stony Brook
.
. Winter Kill of Hard Clams in Great South Bay During the Severe Winter of 1976-
77 -- New York State Sea Grant Institute
. Bacterial Contamination of Shellfish and Shellfish Growing Waters, Great South
Bay, NY -- Princeton University
. Growth of Hard Clams in Great South Bay, NY -- Princeton University
.,
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C.
GREGORY T. GREENE
PAGE 2
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
.
JOHN M. ELLSWORTH
Environmental Scientist
EDUCATION/REGISTRATION
.
Master of Science, Marine Environmental Sciences, State University of New York at Stony
Brook, 1982.
Bachelor of Science, Biology-Geology, University of Rochester, 1978.
EXPERIENCE
.
Mr. Ellsworth is an Environmental Scientist at CA who specializes in projects relating to
marine science, coastal zone management, and environmental impact assessment. He is
highly experienced in the application of computer modeling to processing of
environmental and field data. Mr. Ellsworth's recent project experience includes:
.
. preparation of a series of technical studies on coastal erosion, hazard protection
and marine/coastal resources for the New York State Department of State as part
of the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force Program;
. preparation of an EIS and permit applications for a proposed marina in Port
Jefferson Harbor including mitigation measures for surface waters and wetlands;
.
. conceptual design of channel stabilization and shoreline improvement project at a
Town of Riverhead recreational facility in Wading River;
. preparation of permit requirements for a proposed dredging and beach nourishment
project in Jamesport, NY, including a detailed tidal wetlands inventory;
.
. preparation of a Bay Resources Management Plan for the Oyster Bay/Cold Spring
Harbor Complex, including plans for wildlife habitat and water quality protection.
. assistance in the preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Plans for the Towns
of Southold, Brookhaven, Islip, Huntington, North Hempstead and Oyster Bay.
.
Prior to joining CA, Mr. Ellsworth was a technical specialist at the Marine Sciences
Research Center, Stony Brook, where he was involved in various projects relating to
dredging, dredged material disposal, coastal geology, water quality, and marine resources.
He worked on several projects for the US Army Corps of Engineers including:
development of a microcomputer-based dredged material analysis program; development
of a microcomputer-based model of plume dispersion from dredge material disposal;
studies of possible dredge material containment sites in New York Harbor; development
of a microcomputer-based information storage/retrieval system for the Port Authority of
New York and New Jersey.
.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
WENDY WEBER SALVATI
Environmental Planner
.
EDUCATION/REGISTRATION
B.A., Environmental Design, SUNY at Buffalo, 1984
B.A., Geography, SUNY at Buffalo, 1984
M.S., Urban Planning, Hunter College, NY, 1989
EXPERIENCE
.
.
As a Planner at CA, Ms. Salvati is responsible for projects involving environmental
planning, site planning, and socioeconomic analyses. She is primarily involved in coastal
management planning and zoning and land use studies for Long Island municipalities. Her
recent project experience also includes preparation of coastal management planning
programs as well as land use and zoning analyses in support of environmental impact
statements for several major site developments on Long Island. Recent assignments
conducted by Ms. Salvati include:
. Preparation of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plans (LWRP) for the Towns of
Southold, Brookhaven and Huntington;
.
. Preparation of a harbor management plan for the Village of Port Jefferson and
Village of Sag Harbor;
.
. Preparation of a draft Bay Resources Management Plan for the Oyster Bay/Cold
Spring Harbor Complex for the Town of Oyster Bay;
. Development of a feasibility study and conceptual master plan for a proposed golf
course recreational facility for Suffolk County, NY;
. Assistance with the preparation of the Town of Islip's LWRP draft report;
.
. Preparation of the sections concerning recreational use, public access and
development potential for the Town of Babylon Barrier Beach and Bay Island
Community Study;
. Visual impact analysis, assessment and master plan for proposed residential
development/marina at a former industrial site on Port Jefferson Harbor, NY;
.
. Preparation of the Town of North Hempstead's Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan
(LWRP) and associated EIS; and
.
. Review of regulatory requirements and conducted a noise monitoring study for
preparation of a community noise ordinance for the Town of Oyster Bay, NY.
Prior to joining CA, Ms. Salvati held a position of Planner for another engineering!
environmental firm, where she was responsible for various environmental impact studies
and site planning projects. She was the primary author of a regional Generic
Environmental Impact Statement for future land use in a 20 square mile area in the Town
of Huntington, NY. Ms. Salvati's prior experience includes assignments within the New
York City Department of Planning and the Downtown Flushing Development Corp., where
she was responsible for zoning studies, land use analyses and commercial revitalization
programs.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
JAMES A. GLADYSZ, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
.
EDUCA lION/REGISlRA liON
B.C.E., Civil Engineering, Villanova University, 1981
Registered Engineer in the States of New York and Virginia
.
American Society of Civil Engineers
New York State Professional Engineers Society
EXPERIENCE
.
Mr. Gladysz has a broad range of planning, design and construction supervision experience
in several civil engineering disciplines including marine structures, erosion control, and
environmental permitting and impact analysis. His experience includes design and
construction supervision for over 100 coastal engineering projects with New York State
including bulkhead design, marina berth plans, erosion control systems, beach nourishment,
boat launching ramps, pier design and dredging operations. Mr. Gladysz headed a team for
storm damage survey responsible for estimating and design recommendations for damage
resulting from several major storms in the last 10 years. Repair work included permitting with
NYSDEC, US Army Corps of Engineers and local agencies. Representative projects include:
.
. preparation of a master plan for improvements to Cedar Beach, a popular recreational
beach facility on the Town of Brookhaven's North Shore;
.
design and construction supervision of gabion erosion control system to protect
roadway and renourish beach area adjacent to navigational channel, Mt. Sinai Harbor
Channel, NY;
.
. master plan and design of beach and marina improvements, including erosion control
systems, bulkheads, rest rooms, picnic areas, harbormaster quarters and recreational
areas, Davis Park, Fire Island;
.
.
design and construction supervision of 400 + L.F. of steel bulkhead at marina including
parking facility, dockmaster tower, drainage system and dredging, Port Jefferson
Marina, NY;
. design and construction supervision of 500 + L.F. of steel bulkhead, including parking
and lighting construction, Stony Brook Channel, NY;
.
.
launching ramp design and construction supervision for Mt. Sinai, Port Jefferson, Forge
River-Mastic, Maple Ave-East Moriches, and Corey Park-Blue Point Marinas;
. master plan and beach nourishment projects involving survey, permitting, construction
supervision of material handling, placement and grading for Cedar Beach, Mt. Sinai,
West Meadow Beach, Stony Brook and Sands pit Beach, Patchogue, NY;
.
.
survey, design and supervision of inlet dredging, Mecox Bay, Watermill; and
. design supervision of free standing steel jetty to protect channel, Abets Creek, East
Patchogue, NY.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
.
LAURA ZAIMES SCHWANOF, R.L.A.
Landscape Architect/Ecologist
EDUCATION/REGISTRATION
.
B.S., Forest Biology, State University of New York, College of Environmental
Sciences and Forestry, 1980
B.S., Environmental Sciences and Art, Syracuse University, 1980
R.L.A., 1994
.
American Society of Landscape Architects
Society for Ecological Restoration
National Audubon Society
The Nature Conservancy
The Wildlife Society
EXPERIENCE
.
Ms. Schwanof is a landscape architect and ecologist at CA who is responsible for site and
landscape designs, the preparation of ecological studies, wetland and vegetation surveys,
and other environmental projects. Her areas of expertise include terrestrial and wetland
ecology, soil and water conservation, and site planning. She has recently completed
several major impact statements for projects in Suffolk County, New York, and she is
especially knowledgeable of the biological, physical and regulatory aspects of Long Island.
Ms. Schwanof's recent experience includes a study of colonial waterbird habitats and other
wildlife resources in the Town of Babylon Barrier Beach area. She has prepared landscape
designs for a wide variety of land use types including parks, recreational areas, wildlife
preserves, residential properties, municipal facilities, and commercial properties.
.
.
Ms. Schwanof received a first place award for a Bird Sanctuary for Hofstra University in
Uniondale in a national competition for landscape design for conversion of a recharge
basin into a wildlife sanctuary and education center.
.
She has assisted in the preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Plans (LWRP's) for
several major municipalities on Long Island, NY including the Towns of Huntington,
South old, Brookhaven and Islip. She recently completed detailed ecological studies in
support of Environmental Assessments for proposed new highway construction in Dutchess
County, NY and Westchester County, NY.
Prior to joining CA, Ms. Schwanof worked for eight years as a Soils Conservationist and
Acting District Conservationist for the USDA Soils Conservation Services, where she was
responsible for conservation planning for numerous projects on Long Island. Her
responsibilities included field research, review of site plans, public presentations, and
coordination with other governmental agencies. Examples of projects completed by Ms.
Schwanof include:
.
.
.
.
.
LAURA ZAIMES SCHWAN OF (continued)
.
. Planned, designed, supervised and inspected erosion and sediment control plans
for numerous construction projects.
.
. Participated in Coastal Vegetation Steering Committee to coordinate Federal, State
and local efforts on bluff and shoreline stabilization.
. Various soil conservation, site plan review and farm planning studies in the Towns
of East Hampton and Southampton.
.
. Preparation of the Potential Erosion Hazard Area Map for the Town of Oyster Bay.
. Coordination of soil and water conservation activities with other governmental
agencies, including the Nassau and Suffolk Cooperative Extension Services, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Services, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation, and New York Sea Grant.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
.
JOHN GULDI, P.E., L.S.
Chief Coastal Engineer
EDUCATION/REGISTRATION
.
B.S., Civil Engineering Technology, Rensalaer Polytechnic Institute
M.S., Marine Science, Long Island University
Special Program - Water, Sewer and Drainage Installation, Cornell University
Registered Engineer in NY
Licensed Surveyor in NY
.
EXPERIENCE
.,
Mr. Guidi has approximately 30 years of experience in survey, design and construction of
waterfront structures and other public works projects, and he has served as resident
engineer for numerous public works projects throughout Suffolk County, NY. His
experience includes survey, design and supervision of construction for waterfront
structures, channels, marinas and erosion control structures. He has supervised major
public works projects involving coordination and management of multiple contractors.
An outline of his major project experience is as follows:
.
Chief of Waterways Division, Suffolk County Department of Public Works -- Mr.
Guidi was responsible for the County's waterways construction, maintenance and
dredging projects, including engineering, permitting, and inspection for numerous
projects throughout Suffolk County, NY.
.
.
Chief of Construction, Suffolk County Department of Environmental Control -- Mr.
Guidi supervised $640 million in construction related to the Southwest Sewer
District, including pumping stations, treatment plants, service buildings, sewers and
ocean outfall.
.
. Resident Engineer, Suffolk County Department of Public Works -- Mr. Guidi
supervised construction of the Shinnecock Canal Lock and Tide Gauge facility in
Southhampton, NY.
.
Civil Engineer, Corps of Engineers -- Engineer-in-Charge of erosion control projects.
.
. Civil Engineer, New York State Department of Transportation -- Construction
supervision for roads, bridges and other public works improvements.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
.
FRANCIS D. RIBAUDO, P.E.
Principal Civil Engineer
EDUCATION/REGISTRATION
.
B.S., Bachelor of Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, 1973
Professional Engineer in New York
EXPERIENCE
.
Mr. Ribaudo is a Principal Civil Engineer at CA who is responsible for engineering
supervision of CA's civil engineering projects. Projects presently under his direction
include design of renovations to OTB Headquarters and Branch offices, renovations to
L1LCO District offices, construction of landfill capping, grading, drainage, water supply,
and wastewater treatment for various residential and commercial developments. He is
also responsible for civil engineering on several municipal engineering projects involving
infrastructure improvements, site development and downtown area improvements. His
recent assignments have included:
.
. design for repair and improvements to Ransom Beach, a shorefront park in the
Town of Oyster Bay, NY;
.
. planning and design for site improvements at a shorefront recreational facility and
boat ramp for the Town of Riverhead;
. design and reconstruction of a fishing pier, channel and adjacent beaches at Mt.
Sinai, NY;
.
. design and construction of equipment rooms and buildings for numerous cellular
telephone facilities;
. design and construction of major renovations to buildings and equipment for six
sewage pumping stations for Nassau County, NY;
.
. design for an ash disposal facility, leachate collection system, landfill capping and
other solid waste management facilities for the Town of Babylon, New York;
. design and construction for a new railroad parking facility and entrance roadways
for the Town of Islip, New York; and
.
. site engineering services for a multi-unit residential development in the Village of
Port Jefferson.
.
Prior to joining CA, Mr. Ribaudo held a position as Chief Civil Engineer for another civil
engineering firm, where he served as manager and supervisor for numerous civil
engineering projects. His experience includes site engineering for numerous commercial
and recreational developments, and design for numerous wastewater treatment plants,
pump stations and associated facilities. He was responsible for the site engineering,
including wastewater disposal, drainage and utility supplies, for a variety of major
residential and commercial developments. Prior to this position, Mr. Ribaudo was also
employed at Consoer, Townsend and Associates, as a Project Engineer. He was primarily
involved in the planning and design of wastewater treatment and conveyance facilities.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
.
ROBERT J. PEDNEAULT, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
EDUCATION/REGISTRATION
.
B.S., 1986, Civil and Environmental Engineering
M.S., 1991, Civil and Environmental Engineering
Safety at Hazardous Materials Sites, 40-Hour Certificate, 1990
licensed Professional Engineer in NY
.
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Pedneault is an Environmental Engineer with specialized experience in marine and
coastal engineering and science. As an advanced certified diver, he has served as Project
Engineer on a variety of assignments involving underwater surveys and inspections. This
project experience includes:
.
. preparation of an environmental assessment and technical studies for the proposed
long island Aquarium in Riverhead, NY
. beach and underwater survey of Ransom Beach and subtidal areas, Bayville, NY
. non-destructive bulkhead inspections for the Town of Huntington, NY
. underwater analyses and investigations as part of an EIS for the North Fork of long
Island Condo Complex, Greenport, NY
. preparation of dredging plans and permit applications for marinas on the Hudson
River and Huntington Bay, NY
. underwater surveying and mapping for preparation of a long Island Dive Guide
. canal bottom sounding survey for a waterfront development on long Island's south
shore
. benthic layer and water columns sampling/analysis for bio-assays and chemical
toxicology
. various work involving rescue and care of protected marine mammals for the
Okeanos Ocean Research Foundation
.
.
.
Mr. Pedneault also has expertise in environmental site assessments, remediation projects,
and other assignments related to hazardous materials management. He has conducted site
inspections and environmental assessments for a wide variety of sites including
commercial, industrial and residential site sites. The performance of the audits requires
a thorough knowledge of environmental conditions and hazardous materials, as well as the
environmental codes and regulations on Federal, state and local levels. In addition to
environmental inspections, Mr. Pedneault is assisting on other environmental projects at
CA including: preparation of a health and safety plan for all operations at a solid waste
disposal facility and landfill, which is a designated FederallSuperfund" site; implementa-
tion of testing and remediation program for underground fuel storage tanks for a major
municipality on long Island; and an assessment of a non-permitted construction debris
landfill.
.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
.
JOSEPH IANNUCCI
Supervisor - CADD Operations
EDUCATION/REGISTRATION
.
B.S., Architectural Technology, 1981
A.A.S., Electrical Technology, 1975
Engineering Technician
Construction Engineering Technology (NICET)
.
EXPERIENCE
.
Mr. Iannucci is supervisor of CA's CADD operations, which utilizes AutoCAD ReI.
11 c2. His responsibilities include CADD operations on a multitude of assignments
including design of buildings, pump stations, wastewater treatment facilities, storm
drainage, ponds and grading. Projects have included municipal, residential,
commercial and industrial facilities. Recent CA projects completed utilizing CADD
under Mr. Iannucci's supervision include:
.
. Preparation of coastal zone inventory maps for harbor management plans
prepared for the village of Sag Harbor and Village of Lloyd Harbor;
. Conduit design for New York Telephone throughout Nassau and Suffolk
Counties;
. Renovation/addition to service building at the Bay Park Wastewater Treatment
Plant for Nassau County DPW;
.
. Environmental engineering improvements for water/industrial sampling, analysis
and pre-treatment for Marsel Mirror Company, Brooklyn, NY;
. Water supply and wastewater treatment systems for The Highlands, a multi-unit
residential complex in Port Jefferson, NY;
I.
. Design of building renovations for NYNEX Mobile Cellular Telephone Trans-
ceiver Sites; and
. Interior Renovation of 3 Long Island Lighting Company Improvements.
.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
.
LYNN SOUTHARD
Graphic Artist
EDUCATION/REGISTRATION
A.A.S., 1975, Advertising, Art & Design
.
EXPERIENCE
.
Ms. Southard is a Graphic Artist at Cashin Associates, P.c. who has substantial experience
in graphic design, drafting and mapping for civil works projects, especially those related
to coastal projects. She is familiar with computer drafting and designing techniques, as
well as traditional graphic art procedures. Her relevant project experience includes the
following assignments:
. preparation of contour maps for the Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane
Protection Project, Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, for the U.S. Army Corp. of
Engineers;
.
.
preparation of shoreline map of Coney Island, Brooklyn, NY for the U.S. Army
Corp. of Engineers;
. preparation of shoreline and subsurface maps for Hempstead Harbor, NY for the
U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers;
.
Topographic mapping for three shoreline parks - Riverside Park, Port Washington
Park and Soundview Park, New York City for the NYC Parks Department;
. Preparation of a graphic overlay series for Oyster Bay Harbor showing natural
resources, wetlands and other material and man-made features for the Town of
Oyster Bay, NY;
.
.
.
Graphic overlay to Coastal Zone Management Plans, Town of North Hempstead,
NY;
. Preparation of base maps for the design of storm repairs and erosion control for
Stehli-Ransom Beach, for the Town of Oyster Bay, NY; and
.
.
Preparation of coastal zone inventory maps for harbor management plans prepared
for the village of Sag Harbor and Village of Lloyd Harbor.
.
.
.
.
.
.
rea
~~
Section Five
First Coasta( Corportion
Statement of Qua(ifications
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
FIRST
Coastal
CORPORATION
CORPORATE PROFILE &
MISSION STATEMENT
.
FIRST COASTAL CORPORATION is one of the oldest and most
experienced environmental consulting firms in New York. The firm's
professional staff have provided environmental consulting services
both in the U.s. and abroad since 1975. Today the firm's staff of
consulting environmental engineers and scientists, geologists, and
environmental resource planners provide the qualified services
which are demanded by government and private sector
environmental resource managers in the 1990's.
.
.
FIRST COASTAL CORPORATION is a full-service firm capable of
investigating, analyzing, and remediating problems in all environ-
mental media. Throughout the years, the firm has expanded its
service capability to meet the needs of our clients, comply with the
complex challenges introduced by new and more stringent govern-
ment regulation, as well as incorporate the advances in investigative,
analytical, and remedial technologies.
.
.
The prudent development, management, and protection of our
environmental resources is a corporate philosophy by which FIRST
COASTAL CORPORATION has built a recognized reputation of
excellence in the environmental consulting industry. In addition to
coastal resource management, FIRST COASTAL CORPORATION
provides qualified service in environmental engineering design and
analysis, risk assessment, community action support, regulatory
compliance assessment, and environmental resource management.
.
..
.
,
Environmental Services. Environmental Engineering Services. Erosion Control
First Coastal Corporation
161 Sunset Avenue, P.O. Box 1212
Westhampton Beach, NY 11978
Phone: 516-288-2271
Fax: 516-288-8949
.
Examples of Completed Permit & Design Projects:
. Stone Revetments -
- East Hampton, Southampton & Sands Point, NY
. Steel Bulkheads - Southampton, NY
. Timber Bulkheads- Westhampton Beach, NY
· Bluff Restorations -
from East Hampton to Riverhead Town, NY
· Dune Restorations -
from East Hampton to Rockaway Beach, NY
Call us for further information and a site visit.
.
.
FIRST
eoastal
CORPORATION
.
Environmental Services provides a full
service environmental consulting
capability driven by client needs and
marketplace demands.
.
Environmental Services accomplishes
this by providing a professional
consulting staff of environmental
scientists. coastal geologists, resource
analysts, and resource managers for
support of public, private, and not-for-
profit institutions. A full spectrum of
environmental resource managers,
including attorneys at law, government
regulators and administrators, real
estate developers, members of the
academic community, and private land
owners consult Environmental Services
on a daily basis in search of the multi-
dimensional environmental consulting
services we provide.
.
.
.
Environmental Services has the proven
capability to provide cost effective
coastal resource management,
regulatory compliance monitoring,
wetland management, and
environmental impact assessment.
.
Whether your needs require the
preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement; the formation of a
site development plan which is
compliant with all applicable federal,
state, and local environmental
regulation; support for a permit
hearing process; or the collection and
analysis of environmental data,
Environmental Services can provide
the timely, cost effective environ-
mental consulting services required to
complete your development or
management project.
.
.
.
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Specialties Include:
. EIS Scoping, Preparation, and Review
. New York SEQRA Process Administration
. Site Design, Planning, and Zoning analysis
. Environmental Permitting
. Tidal & Freshwater Wetland Permits
. Coastal Erosional Permits
· Expert Testimony
. Permit & Appeal Hearing Support
. Coastal Erosion Hazard Line Appeal
. Regulatory Compliance Assessment
. Air/Land/Water Sample and Data Collection
. Due Diligence Investigation
. Community Action Support
. Floodplain Analysis and Risk Assessment
. Coastal Erosion Analysis
. NPDES/SPDES Compliant Storm Water Management
. Marine Resource Management
. Numerical Modeling
. Wind and Wave Modeling
Examples of Completed Reports & Studies:
. Southampton Town Post 1992 Coastal Storm Report
. Barrier Island Breach Analysis - Westhampton, NY
. Tidal Wetlands Compliance - Broad Channel, NY
. Tidal Wetlands Inventory - Broad Channel, NY
. Coastal Erosion Hazard Line Remapping -
Southampton, NY
. Coastal Emergency Contingency Report -
Quogue, NY
Environmental Services. Environmental Engineering Services. Erosion Control
.
First Coastal Corporation
161 Sunset Avenue, P.O. Box 1212
Westhampton Beach, NY 11978
Phone: 516-288-2271
Fax: 516-288-8949
.
.
FIRST
eoastal
CORPORATION
.
.
Since 1975, Erosion Control
has maintained and
restored coastal properties
throughout Long Island,
Our coastal resource
management techniques
employ proven methods
which provide cost effective
erosion control.
.
Erosion Control will inspect
your coastal property, and
prepare a Coastal Erosion
Evaluation Report spec-
ifically for your property.
This report will evaluate
your beach / dune environ-
ment, and provide cost
effective recommendations
to help maximize flood and
erosion protection for your
coastal investment. Erosion
Control's Dune
Management Program
provides an inexpensive
long term approach to
erosion control, while our
Dune Restoration projects
provide immediate
solutions to immediate
coastal erosion problems.
.
.
.
.
Erosion Control's timely,
consistent, and cost
effective shoreline
management techniques
provide long term benefits,
as well as long term
customer satisfaction.
.
EROSION CONTROVM
Professional Contract Services Include:
· Coastal Erosion Evaluation
. Annual Dune Management Program
· Dune Restoration
· Beach Regrading
. Beach Grass Planting & Dune Re-Vegetation
· Beach Grass Fertilization
· Dune Irrigation
· Bluff Stabilization & Restoration
· Rock Revetment Installation & Repair
. Bulkhead Installation & Repair
· Wetland Restoration and Mitigation
· Wetland Species Re-Vegetation
. Storm Water Runoff Control & Sediment Control
· Sand Fence Installation
Example of Some Projects Include:
Dune Restoration:
. Wainscott Beach, East Hampton - 2000 linear ft. of dune
. Gin Lane, Southampton - 2000 linear ft. of dune
Beach Regrading:
. Davis Park, Fire Island -1200 linear ft. of dune
· Point O' Woods, Fire Island - 900 linear ft. of dune
Bluff Restoration:
. Oakwood on the Sound, Wading River - 800 ft. of bluff
. Gardeners Bay, East Hampton, - 800 ft. of Bluff
Wetland Restoration:
. Oneck Lane, Westhampton Beach - 15,000 sq. ft.
Sand Fencing:
. 40,000 ocean front feet annually (properties located from
Fire Island to East Hampton)
Beach Grass Planting Project:
. Fire Island - 240,000 sq. ft.
. Shinnecock Inlet - 160,000 sq. ft.
Rock Revetment:
. Moriches Bay, Remsemberg - 250 ft. of shoreline
Bulkhead Installation:
. Quantuck Bay, Westhampton Beach - 600 linear ft.
. Moriches Bay, Westhampton Beach - 250 ft. of shoreline
Call us for further information and a site visit.
.
Environmental Services. Environmental Engineering Services. Erosion Control
First Coastal Corporation
161 Sunset Avenue, P.O. Box 1212
Westhampton Beach. NY 11978
.
Phone: 516-288-2271
Fax: 516-288-8949
.
F1-~~
COc;J,:;/iiL
.
.
ARAM V. TERCHUNIAN, M. Sc.
Curriculum Vitae
.
Areas of Expertise
.
* Coastal geomorphology, coastal processes, and erosion analysis
* Coastal hazard area policy analysis and coastal hazard area management
* Coastal area permitting and erosion control construction
* Coastal disaster survey and evaluations
Experience
.
* 1990 to Present, First Coastal Corporation - President
Responsible for all aspects of the firms consulting and construction services for
coastal property owners, municipalities, and associations.
.
* 1988 to 1990 Coastal Stabilization, Inc. - Regional Manager of Development-
Market development and technical sales for the development of a proprietary
beach stabilization product. Prepared and executed marketing strategy,
prepared and presented technical results at national and international
conferences, and presented proposals and RFP responses to local, State, and
Federal agencies.
.
* 1984 to 1988, New York State, Department of State, Division of Coastal
Resources - Coastal Hazards Supervisor - Responsible for review and
recommendations for improvement of existing coastal hazard area management
programs in New York State, including coastal erosion hazard areas, flood
protection, and disaster relief. Represented the Secretary of State in post
coastal disaster survey, assessment, and evaluation teams. Reviewed erosion
control and coastal area development actions within coastal hazards areas in
New York's coastal zone.
.
* 1982 to 1983, University of Delaware and Ecuadorean Remote Sensing
Agency - Technical Advisor - Instructed Ecuadorean nationals in the use of
remote sensing techniques for natural resources mapping including mangroves,
coastal erosion, sea surface temperatures, and Amazon land use changes.
Prepared grant application for Space Shuttle Imaging Radar mission.
.
Education
* M. Sc. Marine Studies (Coastal Geology), University of Delaware, 1984
M. Sc. Thesis: Hen and Chickens Shoal, Delaware: Evolution of a Modern Tidal Shoal
.
* B. S. Environmental Science and Resource Management (Geology), Lehigh University,
1980
.
;Cirst Coastal Corporation, Postal Box 1212, 161 Sunset Avenue
\Ve~rhampton Beach, New York 11978 (516) 288-2271/FAX (516) 288-8949
printed on recycled paper
.
.
.
.
ARAM V. TERCHUNIAN, M.SC.
Curriculum Vitae
Page Two
Publications
.
* Terchunian, A. V" 1990, Performance of Beachface Dewatering: The
STABEACH System at Sailfish Point (Stuart), Florida, In Proceedinas of the
1990 Conference on Beach Preservation Technoloav, St. Petersburg, FL
.
* Ball, Sally, F.. P. R. Lanza, and A V, Terchunian, 1989, Coastal Hazard Area
Management in New York State. in Proceedinas of Coastal Zone '89,
Charleston, South Carolina, pp. 4749 - 4760.
* Terchunian, A. V.. 1988, Can Seawalls and Beaches Coexist? in Journal of
Coastal Research. Special Issue 4, Autumn, 1988 Krauss, N. and O. H, Pilkey
(eds.)
.
* Terchunian, A. V.. and C, H. Fletcher, III, 1984, Current and Shoreline Effects
of Shore Perpendicular Structures, in Proceedinas of the 10th Annual Coastal
Societv Conference. Atlantic City, NJ
.
* Terchunian, A. V.. V. Klemas, A. Alverez, B, Vasconez. and L Guerrero,
1984. The Effect of Shrimp Pond Development on Mangroves, In
Environmental Manaaement, v10 n3 .
Professional Affiliations
.
American Shore and Beach Preservation Association, Member
American Littoral Society, Member
Association of State Floodplain Managers, Member
Coastal Education Research Foundation, Member
Florida Oceanographic Society, Member
Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association, Member
Group for the South Fork, Member
Long Island Coastal Alliance, Member
Long Island Shore and Beach Preservation Association, President
Peconic Land Trust. Member
Surfrider Foundation. Member
The Coastal Society, Member
The Nature Conservancy, Member
The Cousteau Society, Member
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Walter F. Bundy
Areas of Expertise
.
. FEMA Mitigation Programs, including the Community Rating System (CRS) and Hazard Mitigation Grant
Program (HMGP)
Evaluation of pre- and post-disaster planning for FEMA HMGP applications
Aoplying the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Process
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Evaluation and analysis of standards and codes, and the negotiation and preparation of new standards
Experience
.
. 1994 to present, First Coastal Corporation - Programs Administrator/Analysist
Responsible for performing evaluations and assessments of Municipalities' Community Rating System
(CRS) Programs and preparing supporting CRS and Grant funding applications for submittal by Municipali-
ties.
.
. 1993 to 1994, FEMA, Region II Hazard Mitigation - Hazard Mitigation Program Officer
Responsibilities centered primarily on issues and interface with the New York State (NYS) Hazard Mitigation
Officers concerning NYS Hazard Mitigation (HM) Programs. Interacted with other FEMA Divisions and
Federal & State Agencies concerning the status and requirements of State HM Plans. Monitoring and
administration of HMGP Projects; and evaluation of pre- and post-disaster planning. Provided guidance and
special assistance to State officials regarding the HMGP Administrative Plan and HMGP Applications. Acted
as Team Leader for code issues and interacted with other Federal and State Agencies concerning the code
issues and recommendations included in the FEMA Interagency Hazard Mitigation Survey Team Reports for
recent NYS Disasters.
.
. 1992 to 1993, Local Organizations and Architects- Free Lance Project Manager
Project Management; codes analysis, and determination of Building and Site Improvements for Projects
Including commercial facilities and residences.
.
. 1982 to 1992, Grumman Corporation - three (3) positions held -
Project Engineer assigned to Facilities Engineering - Project Management; codes analysis and determi-
nation of building and site improvements; estimating; design; and specification writing for Projects including
commercial. office, technical and computer support, industrial and educational facilities.
Facilities Engineering Representative - Responsible for planning associated with all Government Owned,
Contractor Operated (GOCO) Gnumman Facilities. Evaluation of existing facilities and preparing five year
rehabilitation programs for all Gnumman GOCO Facilities in Bethpage and Calverton, New York.
Project Engineer assigned to Project Evaluation, Estimating and Scheduling - preformed review and
evaiuation of projects and provided an evaluation, cost estimate, planning schedule and ground nules and
assumptions associated with the projects for managements review and approval of funds. Monitored
projects progress and evaluated and accepted all proposed changes in scope and schedule.
.
.
. 1972 to 1982 Local/Regional Architects and Engineers -
Project Manager, Project Coordinator, Architectural DesignerlDraftsman and Specifications Writer-
for new work and renovation projects for numerous commercial, industrial, office and educational facilities,
and residential buildings.
.
@ Prin"',, ,,,' R,c~'cled Paper
FIRST
Coafla
.
.
.
.
Walter F. Bundy
Page Two
Education and Training
.
FEMA Seminars and Training
Regional-State Hazard Mitigation Training relating to the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) and
Hazard Mitigation (HM) Plan Requirements.
ApplYing the NEPA Process (National Environmental Policy Act)
. Architectural Seminars
Hofstra University
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Seminars
.
American Institute of Architects
Various Topics, including: Energy Conservation; Fire Prevention and Handicap Access; Access Security;
Plumbing Systems, and Accessible Design
American Arbitration Association
Construction Arbitration Principles
.
New York State Energy Conservation Construction Code Seminars
New York State Code Requirements for Accessible Design Seminars
.
Long Island Technical School - Graduated 1972
100 East Old Country Road
Hicksvllle. New York
Degree Certificate of Completion - Architectural Technology
.
.
.
.
.
.
Christopher P. Jones, P.E.
.
Educmion
M.S. 1977. Coastal and Oceano{,'Taphic Engineering, University
of Florida. Thesis: An Evaluation ojSandBypassing Systems
at TidallnJelS in Florida.
.
B.S. 1975. Engineering Sciences, University of Horida.
Rel1i~trHtinn
P.E. Florida, 1987 (civil engineering); South Carolina,
1987 (civil engineering); North Carolina, 1991 (civil
engineering), Virginia (pending).
.
Summmy of Experience
.
In his 17 years of professional experience, Mr. Jones has carried out and/or directed over 200
studics and projects related to coastal processes, erosion control, beach and dune restoration,
coastal construction codes, natural hazards planning, tidal inlets, dredging, marinas and
waterfront development. He has worked on projects throughout the United States, including
the Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, New England, Gulf of Mexico, Alaska and Hawaii; he has also
worked in the Caribbean and in the Middle East. Mr. Jones is a recognized expen on maners
related to coastal processes, tidal inlets and erosion control. Mr. Jones is experienced with all
aspects of coastal cnginocring and coastal management projccls, including: project planning,
data collection and analysis, design, permitting, COnstruction management, community relations
and expen witness testimony. He has served as a consultant to local. state and federal
agencies, as well as privare organizations.
.
Prior to joining EARTH TECH in 1993, Mr. Jones worked for coastal engineering consulting
finns in Florida and South Carolina. He also served six and one-half years as the statewide
coastal engineering specialist for the Florida Sea Grant Program.
.
Selected ElIperience
. SC and FL Beach Management Plans: Hony Co., Surfside Beach, rsle of Palms,
Sullivan's Island, and KiaWah Island, SC; Brevard Co., PI.
. Cape Charles, VA, Erosion Analysis and Detached Brcakwarer Design
. Lake La Vista Inlet, FL, Design of Jetty Repairs and Sand Bypassing Program
· South Carolina Coastal Council. Establishment of Erosion Rates/Setback Lines
. State of Delaware, Coastal Storm Preparedness and Recovery Plan
. Kuwait City, Kuwait, Shoreline Surveys and Stabilization Design
. Jupiter Inlet District, PI., Development of Sand Bypassing Perfonnance Standards
. Harwich and Nantucket, MA, Erosion Analysis for Submatine Cable Landfall
.
.
EARTH@)T EO H
Fnr",urly Apllli.oI TCl'hnltlugy (II Knf(innl!rintt, 1',<:.
.
.
.
.
.
First Coastal Corporation
161 Sunset Ave, P.O. Box 1212
Westhampton Beach, NY 11978
(516) 288-8949
LIST OF EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES JULY 1994
.
Land Survey Equipment (Transit, Rod, Chains, etc)
4x4 Field Survey Vehicles
1993 Jimmy
1992 Ford Explorer
1980 Ford F250 Pickup
1980 Chevy C-20 pickup
.
.
Field Equipment
Three (3) 35mm cameras
Compass, Hand lens, and Field Books
2" Hand Auger & 15' of extensions
Boats
32' plywood & fiberglass closed cabin survey boat
Oepthfinder & Mini Ranger adaptable
6' fiberglass closed cabin supply boat
.
Communications
Three (3) Motorola portable cellular telephones
One (1) Panasonic transportable cellular telephone
Two (2) sets field walkie-talkies
.
Computer Equipment
IBM Compatible Network:
One (1) 486 OX 66 with 16 Megs Ram & 200 Megs HO
Two (2) 486 SX (50) with 8 Megs Ram & 250 Megs HO
One (1) 486 SX (33) with 6 Megs Ram & 120 Megs HO
One (1) 386 SX (33) with 6 Megs Ram & 120 Megs HO
One (1) 286 PC
One (1) HP LaserJet 4
.
.
.
.
.
.
Computer Equipment (continued...)
.
.
Apple network:
One (1) Macintosh Mac II
One (1) Macintosh LC
One (1) Macintosh Plus
One (1) Apple Laser Writer 630
One (1) Macintosh Centris 650 (12MB RAM)
(1) Hard Drive Lacie ZFP (170MB)
One (1) Zoom Fax modem FX9624V
Apple 14" Monitor
Apple Keyboard II
Kensington Turbo Mouse
Hewlett Packard Laserjet IIIP
Various Computer Software
.
.
Various Technical Software
SURFER, ACES (v1.07), Quattro Pro, Wordperfect, Q&A, Canvas, WinFax
4th Dimension, Excell, MacDraft, Microsoft Word, Map Info
.
In House Library
Over 2,000 technical articles in house
Inter Library loan to SUNY Stony Brook Federal Repository Library
Subscription to 30 technical newsletter & scientific /engineering journals
.
Mechanical Tools, Surface, and Sub.Surface Exploration Tools
Air compressor with Pneumatic attachments
Vibra Vore Unit and attachments with Tripod
Hand Auger with 3 five foot extensions, Rod
Transit, and Tripod with 50', 100' and 300' tapes
.
Heavy Equipment
3 & 1/2 yard Hough payloader 650
2 yard combo International 1600 loader/backhoe
Case 750 bulldozer
2 & 1/2 ton 6 wheel military, all wheel drive
5 ton 8 wheel military, all wheel drive
6 wheel, 20 ton Mack Dump Truck & 20 ton trailer
.
c3\qAWIN\DOC\equip.100
.
.
.
.
.
~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Section Six:
Fee ProposaC
.
.
.
SECTION 6 . FEE PROPOSAL
.
CA's professional fee for preparing the Local Erosion Management Plan in accordance
.
with the work program described in Section 2 of this proposal is $45,000. An
estimated manhour and fee breakdown for both Cashin Associates and First Coastal is
given in Table 1.
.
CA proposes to invoice the Town on an hourly basis, based on the number of hours
expended on the project by CA professional personnel and their standard billing rates.
.
CA will not bill the Town for travel or other direct expenses, and all labor, direct and
indirect costs are included in the total fee. Subconsultant fees will be passed through
without mark-up.
.
The RFP states that the Town will pay the consultant in-full upon final submission of
.
the Final Draft Plan. CA proposes to submit interim invoices during the course of the
project. If possible, CA requests that interim invoices be paid by the Town contingent
upon the Town receiving payment for the Department of State. It is recognized that
the final amount will not be paid until the Plan is completed.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
FEE PROPOSAL
SECTION 6
.
.
.
TABLE 1
.
.
ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND FEE BREAKDOWN
SOUTHOLD LOCAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PLAN
.
Estimated Dollar
Manhours Amount
Task A 1 Description of Coastal Processes 70 $ 4,900
Task A2 Inventory 50 3,400
Task A3 Erosion/Flooding Issues Analyses 110 7,700
Task A4 Policy and Implementation Techniques 90 6,300
Task A5 Post Storm Recovery Plan 50 3,500
Task A6 Recommended Projects 30 2,100
Task A7 Public Education Recommendations 30 2,100
Subtotal 430 $30,000
Task B1 Historical Map Analyses 55 3,900
Task B2 Shoreline Development Review 30 2,100
Task B3 Coastal Processes Review 30 2,100
Task B4 Shoreline Structure Review 20 1,400
Task 85 Shoreline Condition Assessment 30 2,100
Task B6 Methods of Addressing Erosion Problems 20 1,400
Task B7 Management Methods 30 2,100
Subtotal 215 15,000
Total 640 $45,000
.
.
.
.
.
.
CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c.
FEE PROPOSAL
SECTION 6
.
f
RFP - LOCAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PLAN
DUE: 11 :00 A.M.. Tuesday. December 6. 1994.
11/141. Larry Tuthill. P.O. Box 162. Greenport. N. Y. 11944
11/152. Wave Abatement Systems, 3392 Oaklawn Ave.. Southold. NY - 765-9294-Richard Greene
11/183. Andy Forsberg, 56 Washington Ave.. Cedarhurst. NY 11516 - 378-7640
11/284. Daniel Rothenberg. 166 Cliffmore Rd. West Hartford. CT 06107
5.
6.
---.
.
.
a5 -771-
CONSULTANTS,INC.
November 14, 1994
Town of South old
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
~ECEMD
DEe 6 19M
Attention:
Ms. Judith T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
r own CIeri Suldllald
Reference:
RFP - Develop Local Erosion Management Plan
Dear Ms. Terry:
Ocean and Coastal Consultants, Inc. has reviewed in detail the RFP that was received for the above
referenced project. During our review, we developed a manhour/cost matrix of all the work tasks
being requested and the level of effort required to meet the goals and objectives of the Project. We
have determined that the project is under funded. Furthermore, the Town is requesting that a
significant amount offield work be undertaken during the winter months. Therefore, we will not be
submitting a proposal for this project.
We would like to be considered for future projects for the Town of Southold. Therefore, I have
attached a brochure with our company background for your files.
Best of luck with the project.
Very truly yours,
ULTANTS,INC.
Stanley M. White, P.E.
President
N :\PROPOSAL\SOUTHOLD.PRO
Attachment: OCC Brochure
35 Corporate Drive, Trumbull. CT 06611 (203) 268-5007 FAX 268-8821
I
I
.
-
-
CONSULTANTS, INC.
.
.
-
-
.
.
!!!!
CONSULTANTS,INC.
GENERAL OUALlFICATlONS
OCEAN AND COAST AL CONSULT ANTS, INC is a consulting firm founded in order to provide
the private and public sector with unique expertise for solving problems in the offshore and coastal
environments. The firm is constantly growing and offers a wide variety of services including: port
and harbor development; design of coastal structures; offshore related specialty equipment; prediction
of waves, surges, winds, and currents; sedimentation and erosion studies; design of intake and
discharge structures; complete permitting; preparation of contract plans and specifications; cost
estimating; and construction supervision.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC consists of a staff of trained professional
engineers. Their extensive United States and international experience provides clients with many
years of practical and theoretical expertise. OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC
appreciates important aspects of the business world such as economics, communication, and the need
to focus on a particular problem without pursuing costly and unnecessary diversions. The strong
practical background of the OCEAN AND COAST AL CONSULT ANTS, INC staff enables
effective and economical solutions to any engineering problem using state-of-the-art or theoretical
techniques.
35 Corporate Drive, Trumbull, CT 06611 (203) 268-5007 FAX 268-8821
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
RESOURCES
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC. resources include
-In-house PC Computer Network;
-Capability of communicating with any outside computer;
-Extensive library resources;
-Various numerical modeling programs and AutoCAD which can be developed
or adapted to suit the Client's needs
AREAS OF EXPERTISE
OCEAN ENGINEERING
-Design of special equipment for shipboard use
- Transportation
- Determination of design criteria
COAST AL ENGINEERING
- Design of port and harbor facilities
-Marina planning and design
_ Harbor protection - fixed and floating
-Site screening studies
- Determination of design criteria
-Sedimentation accretion and erosion
-Storm tide, current, wave and wind prediction
NUMERICAL MODELING
-Storm surge or wind set-up
-Coastal flooding
-Structural analysis
- Berthed vessel mooring loads
- Vesse] anchor loads
FIELD DATA COLLECTION
- Initial collection program design
-Operation
- Data breakout
- Data interpretation and analysis
FEASIBILITY STUDIES
- Dock Facilities
- Transshipment terminals
- Marine transportation
- Marinas
- Breakwaters
-Beach rejuvenation
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
- Planning
-Scheduling
- Permitting
-Construction supervision
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
II
!
. .
REPRESENTATIVE LIST OF CLIENTS
OIL COMPANIES
.Mohil Oil Corporation, Mount Vernon Teoninal
.Mobil Oil Corporation, Port Mobil Teoninal
.Mohi] Oil Corporation, Newhurgb Terminal
.Mobi] Oil Corporation, New !laven Teoninal
. Mobil Oil Corporation, Trenton T enninal
.Mobil Oil Corporation, Buffalo Tenninal
.Mohil Oil Corporation, Burlington Tennina]
.Mohil Oil Corporation, East Providence Tenninal
'Mobil Oil Corporation, South Portland Termina]
.Mohi] Oil Corporation, Norfolk Terminal
.lnternational-Matex Tank Teoninals
'Gu]f Oil Ltd. Partnc'fship, So. P0I11and T eoninal
~Champion Energy Corporation, Greenwich
.!lollinan Fuel, Stamford Teoninal
.]nland Teonina]s, Inc., Bridgeport Terminal
ENGINEER]NG F]RMS
..Storch Engincl..'fs (I3oston oflicc)
"Greiner Engineering Services, Inc.
. HydroQual, Inc.
ARCIIITECTS
"Environmental Design Associates
'Quennell Rothschild Associates
..Stuart Associates
.. Do Chung and Partners
"Landworks Architects
"Preiss Brcismcistcr, P.C.
MUN]C]PALITIES
.City of New York, Dept of Ports and leoninals
...Cit)rofNcw York, Dept. of Envirnn. Protection
..City of New York, Dept. of Sanitation
"City of New York, Dcpt. Parks and Recreation
.City of New Rochelle, NY
...Town of West port, CT
'Clty of Norwalk, Cl
.. Town of Groton, CT
.City of Stamford, CT
.Town ofMill()rd, CT
.City of New !laven, CT
'City ofllartt()rd, CT
.. Town of Daricn, CT
.Town of Catskill, NY
.. Town of Stratford
"'City of West llavcn
BANKS
'U.ST Bank (Bridgeport, CT)
. Den norske Bank (New York, NY)
..Consolidated Asset Recovery COIlJoration
FEDERAL AGENCIES
"Naval Undersea Warfare Center, New London
UTILITY COMPANIES
'United Illuminating, Bridgeport Harhor Station
.United Illuminating, New Haven Harbor Station
. Long Island Power Authority
.Delmarva Power & Light, Edgcmoor Station
DEVELOPERS
. Lexington Construction Corporation
..Cutter Development
. The Giegerich Co.
'Frank Mereede & Sons
.ARCORP Properties, ]ne.
"Collins Development
"Eichner Development
"Harbour Landing Development
.. Marketing Corporation of America
..(Juilmar, Inc.
.Old North Wharf Company
OWNER/OPERATORS
..Uridgeport & Port Jefferson Steamship Co
..Sonat Marine
"Constitution Marina
.Larehmont Yacht Club
..Shore & Country Club, Inc.
.. 79th Street Boat Owner's Association
.Sprite Island Yacht Club
..Cupecoy Bcach Resort
..Peckham Materials COJTloration
. Norwalk Yacht Club
.Cedar Pomt Y"eht Cluh
.BUlT Brothers Boat Yard
.. Noroton Yacht Club
. Pequot Yacht Cluh
.Saugatuek Harhor Yacht Club
.East End Yacht C1uh (Bridgeport, CT)
.The Belle Haven Cluh (Greenwich, CT)
.The Roton Point Club (Rowayton, CT)
..Furon CHR Division
'Manursing Island Cluh (Rye, NY)
N)M]RALTY LAW FIRMS
. Freehill, I logan & Mahar
CONTRACTORS
"McDermott International
.Fairfield Dock Company
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
LIST OF REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY
NEW HAVEN HARBOR STATION
NEW HAVEN, CT
REHABILIT A TION AND UPGRADE OF OIL DOCK FACILITIES
OCC performed underwater inspection of timber pile (1300) supported concrete decked (500' by
500') oil dock constructed in 1928. Evaluation of existing structures provided the basis of a
rehabilitation program over a two year period. OCC provided design and observation of work in
progress (full time engineer and diver) as well as assistance with obtaining permits. Worked with
Owner to develop data base monitoring system for QNQC of construction activities. Project
Ongoing.
CITY OF NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
CSO ABATEMENT PROGRAM
Subcontractor to HydroQual, Inc. for the design and observation of work in progress related to the
collection and legal disposal of floatables discharged from CSOs during a storm event. Project
included the design of booming systems, testing of specialized equipment, design of specialized
unloading systems and barges and assistance in the purchase of skimmer vessels at twenty four sites
Ongoing Project.
CITY OF NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION
MARINE TRANSPORTATION STATIONS
Subcontractor to Atometrics Inc. for the evaluation of barge fendering systems, as built drawings and
the development of alternative fendering system. OCC will be involved with the design and
construction of the rehabilitation of the fendering marine hardware. Ongoing Project.
GREENWICH HARBOR CLUB
COS COB MARINA
GREENWICH, CT
STEEL SHEET PILE BULKHEAD
Planning, final design, Contract Documents and construction supervision for approximately 1,700
linear feet of steel sheet pile bulkhead Bulkhead secured with traditional deadmen as well as ground
anchors.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
LIST OF REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
- 2 -
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
SOUTH PORTLAND TERMINAL
SOUTH PORTLAND, ME
MARINE FACILITIES UPGRADE
OCC provided engineering analysis to form a basis for the construction of four new mooring dolphins
and upgrading of two existing breasting dolphins New fendering systems and mooring systems were
included. OCC developed soil boring program associated with the engineering effort. Assisted
Owner in obtaining required permits. Assisted Owner in the evaluation of future needs for the
Terminal. This work included the evaluation of a 5,000 vessel data base for design and shipment
criteria
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
PORT MOBIL TERMINAL, STATEN ISLAND, NY
MARINE FACILITIES INSPECTION AND REPAIR
Ocean and Coastal Consultant, Inc. was retained by Mobil Oil Corporation to provide a complete
underwater and above water inspection of approximately 2,600 linear feet of steel sheet pile bulkhead,
1,600 linear feet of continuous barge fender system, Tanker Berth mooring and breasting dolphins
and Barge Cleaning Plant mooring and breasting dolphins. Areas of deterioration and mechanical
damage were identified. Structural analysis of existing conditions was performed. Project included
final design and Contract Documents of recommended repairs and obtaining all Federal, State and
Local permits. In accordance with permit requirements, observation of work in progress is provided.
CITY OF NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION
MARINE FACILITIES HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS AND DREDGE VOLUMES
Work included open ended three year contract to perform hydrographic surveys at NYCDOS marine
facilities, including Fresh Kill Landfill Reports generated to be used for condition surveys, pre-
dredge survey and post-dredge survey State of the art data collection and analysis utilized for all
phases of the contract.
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
NEWBURGH TERMINAL, NEWBURGH, NY
INSPECTION AND UPGRADE OF MARINE FACILITIES
Work included the complete inspection of the Terminal's marine facilities including access trestle,
unloading platform and two mooringlbreasting dolphins. Final design, Contract Documents, permits
and construction supervision for recommended repairs.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
LIST OF REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
- 3 -
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
NEW HAVEN TERMINAL, NEW HAYEN, CT
INSPECTION AND UPGRADE OF MARINE FACILITIES
Work included the complete inspection, above water and underwater, of the Terminal's marine
facilities including access trestle, unloading platform and dolphins. Previous inspection by others
recommended replacement offacilities. OCC developed a plan to rehabilitate the facility and perform
all construction activities while the Terminal remained active OCC provided services for final design,
Contract Documents, permits and observation of work in progress.
URBCO
STAMFORD HARBOR PARK., STAMFORD, CT
DESIGN OF MARINE FACILITIES
Project included planning, permitting, final design, Contract Documents and construction supervision
for waterfront facilities Areas of work included approximately seven hundred feet of steel sheet pile
bulkhead, marina facilities (docks and utilities) and dredging
OLD NORTH WHARF COMPANY
NANTUCKET, MA
RECONSTRUCTION OF WHARF
Ocean and Coastal Consultants, Inc. was retained to provide planning, permitting and final design
services for the reconstruction of a historic wharf that was destroyed during a fire in 1847.
RIVERFRONT RECAPTURE - CITY OF HARTFORD
CHARTER OAK AND RIVERSIDE PARKS
PIER FACILITIES
Scope of work included design, Contract Documents, permitting and construction supervision for a
pier that is used by commercial vessels as well as public access. Pier was designed to be completely
submerged during annual flooding of the Connecticut River.
NEW YORK CITY DEPT. OF PORTS AND TERMINALS
SHEEPSHEAD SAY, NEW YORK
REHABILITATION OF COMMERCIAL DOCKING FACILITIES
Project involved the preparation of a Preliminary Design Investigation Report (POI) for the
replacement of ten piers. The POI was used by a team of in-house engineers to complete the final
design. The POI provided guidance to the Department for the preparation of final design and
Contract Documents.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
j
.
CONSULTANTS,INC.
STANLEY M. WHITE. P.E.
PRESIDENT
EDUCA TION
Union College, Schenectady, New York
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Master of Science in Civil Engineering
Degree of Civil Engineering (Professional Degree)
(Ocean and Coastal Engineering)
PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION
Licensed Professional Engineer
State of Louisiana
State of Connecticut
State of New Jersey
State of Massachusetts
American Society of Civil Engineers
Former Chairman, Met Section - Waterway Group
NAUI Scuba Diver
State of Maine
State of Rhode Island
State of New York
PUBLICA TIONS
"Experimental Investigation of Submerged Condenser Cooling Water Discharge into Casco
Bay (William F. Wyman Station)", co-authored with G.H. Jirka and D.R.F. Harleman,
Technical Report No. 186, R.M. Parsons Laboratory for Water Resources and
Hydrodynamics, Department of Civil Engineering, M.LT., Julv 1974.
"Energy Dissipation on a Rough Slope", co-authored with O.S. Madsen, Journal of
Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering Division, VoL 102, No. WWI. February 1976.
"Reflection and Transmission Characteristics of Porous Rubble Mound Breakwater", co-
authored with O.S. Madsen, US. Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research
Center, Miscellaneous Report No. 76-5, March 1976.
"Optimizing Pier Design by Utilizing Deck Stiffness", co-authored with Dennis V. Padron,
Ports '83 Specialty Conference, Modernization, Upgrading and Repairs, New Orleans, LA,
March 1983.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS (ON FOLLOWING PAGES)
35 Corporate Drive, Trumbull, CT 06611 (203) 268-5007 FAX 268-8821
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCAT[ON
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
.
.
STANLEY M. WHITE (Cont'd)
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Marine Facilities Inspection and Repair
Staten Is[and, New York
Complete lU1dcrwatcr and above water inspcction of approximately 2,600 linear teet of sted sheet pile
bulkhead, I,GOO linear feel of continuous harge fender system, Tanker Berth mooring and hrcasling
dolphins and Barge Cleaning Plant mooring and hreasting dolphins. Arcas or deterioration and
mechanical damage Wt"j"C idt..'11tificd. Structural analysis of existing conditions was pctformed. Final
design and Contract Documents of recommended repairs are being prepared. All Federal, State and
Local pelmits will be obtained for Mobil. Construction supervision was provided.
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
T auker Berth Inspection and Repair
Staten rsland, New York
Work included inspection of upland facilities, design, Contract Documents and pcnnits for the
replacement of reinforced concrete dt."Ck, and emergency repairs required to hose lower structure.
Provided constmction supervision services.
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Inspection and Upgrade of Marine Facilities
Newhurgh T emlina[, Newhurgh, New Yark
Work included the complde inspection of the Terminal's marine facilities including access trestle,
unloading platti)lm and two mooring/brcasting dolphins. Final design, Contract Documents, permits
and constmction supervision fix recommended repairs. ConstlUction is complete.
MomL OIL CORPORA nON
Inspection and Upgrade of Marine Facilities
New Haven Tt.'tTI1inaL New Haven, Connecticut
Work included the complete inspection, above and under water, ofthc Terminal's marine facilities
including access trestle, W1loading platform and dolphins. Previous inspection hy others recommend-
ed replacement offacilitics. Developed a plan to rehabilitate the facility and perl{llTIl all C(lOstruction
activities while the Tcrminal remained active We provide services l{lr tinal desit.'1l, Contract nOCll~
ments, pelmits and construction supervision.
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Petroleum Products Tenninal RehabIlitation
New Jersey
Detail design and permit applicatIOn for berth upgrading to accommodate tankers or 80 to 280
KDWT, m(xlring load monitoring system, tire protcction system, and dredging.
MOBIL 0[[, CORPORATION
Petroleum Tenninal Fendcr System
New Yark
Preliminary study, detail design, permit application and construction supervision for a new fender
system for three product harge berths at Staten [sland.
MOBIL OIL CORPORA nON
Petroleum Tellllinal Rehahilitation
Massachusetts
Feasihility study and detailed design for rehahilitation or rep[aeement of existing timher piled reliev-
ing platti"nn tanker/harge herth.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLIl'NT
PROJECT:
I,OCATlON:
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PRO.mCT:
I,OCATION:
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT:
l.OCATION.
SCOPE:
CI.IENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
l.OCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
IDCA TION
SCOPE:
.
.
STANLEY M. WHITE (Coot'd)
MOBIl. 011, CORPORATION
Tanker Belih Repair
New York
Inspection, detailed design and permitting 1l..l[ the rehahilitation of a damaged tanker herth hrcasting
dolphm at Staten Island.
EXXON
Marine Tenninal Feasihihty Study
New Jersey
Prepared a feasibility study lor upgrading Pier No. I at Exxon's plant, Bayonne, NJ.
EXXON
Marine Tenninal Upgrading
New Jersey
Site investigation, pel1l1itling and preliminary design or upgJading of Piers No. I and 6 at Exxon's
plant, Bayonne, N.I.
CIBRO PETROLEUM, INC.
Barge Berth Improvements
New York
Surveys, preliminary studies, detailed design, pClmitting and constlUction supervision of the
installation of dolphins and piping manifold platJ(lIm replacing a deteriorated marine facility.
GREENWICH IIARHOR CLUB (COS COB MARINA)
Steel Sheet Pile Bulkhead
Greenwich, Connecticut
Planning, fmal design, C'mlraet Document, and construction supervision I(l[ approximately 1,700 Im-
car feet of steel sheet pile hulkhead.
NEW YORK CITY DEPT OF PORTS AND TERMINALS
Rehahilitation of Commercial Docking Faeihties
Sheepshead Bay, New York
Project involved the preparation of a Preliminary Design Investigation RCpot1 (PDt) for the replace-
ment of (en piers. The PDl was used hy a team of in-house engineers to complete the final desi~'11.
The PDI provided guidance to the Department for the preparation of final design and Contract
Documt...'1lts.
URBCO
IJesigI1 ()fMarinc Facilities
Stamford, Connecticut
Pn~jcct included planning, pcnnitting, fmal design, Contract Documents and construction supervision
h waterfiunt facilities. Arcas of work included approximately seven hundred fc'Ct of stecl sheet pile
bulkhead, marina t;,eilities (docks and utilities) and dredging.
CITY OF BRIDGEI'ORTIPOINl CONSTRUCTION (GENERAL CONTRACTOR)
Design of Utility SuppOlis and CoOcrdams
Berkshire A venue Bridge, BridgepOli, CT
Services included the design of temporary utility suppol1 trestle for fiber optic cahlcs, water and
sewage 'ystems Two cofhdams 11..00 "" the construction of new hridge piers were designed I(lr the
General Contractor. Work included construction supervision.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLlLNT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPI,
CLlI;NT
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJI;CT:
LOCATION.
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
.
.
STANLEY M. WHITE (Coot'd)
OLI) NORlIl WIIARF COMPANY
Rccol1:-itruction of I listoric Wharf
Nantucket, Massachusetts
Ocean and Coastal Commltants, Inc. was retained to provide planning, permitting and Iinal design ser-
vices for the reconstruction of a historic wharf that was destroyed during a fire in 1847.
u.S. NA VY
Pier Improvements
Connecticut
SWV'<.:y of existing Pier 17 used to moor floating dry docks and detailed dCSlt-,1Jl of modifications and
improvements to convclt it for mooring suhmmincs and service craft. Scope included new fender sys-
tem, deck repair, upgrading of all utilities and other miscellaneous \\'ork. ^lso included was modi-
fication of utili lies on Picr 2.
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW YORK DISTRICT
West Point Military Academy
New York
Survey of lire damage to existing P()I, I )ol,;k, detailcd design of repairs and Specifications fiX repairs
and dredging.
US NAVY
DM-26
Evaluated mooring data and established {I)fee curves flJr calculating mooring loads.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Breakwater Research
Ma~sachusctts
Investigated the dependence of\vave Lllcrgy dissipation on the fhmt face ofhrcakwatcrs as a function
of the angle or slope and size of construction material. Anal:,tical and physical model studies of
practical, thctn-ctical predictions of wave transmission and reflection charaderistics of porous lllhhle
mount hreakwaters. Methodology used in Shore Protection Manual.
SllELL OIL CORPORA nON
Installation Offshore Jacket
Gulf of Mexico
Design of special installation equipment, d:ynamlc analysis of offshore operations and pmticipatcd in
solving operational prohlems for the installation of "COGNAC PLATFORM AU project.
ELDEC CORPORA nON
Marine Equipment
Washington
Pnxluct detlnition and market analysis for onshore drillingjackup rig load monitoring equipment.
HONEYWI'I L, INC.
Dynamic Positioning Equipment
Washington
Dt.."'Sign of through- the-hull taut wire !-o'Ystem for dynamic positioning systems used hy drill ships in ice
floc areas.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PRO.n!CT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
CLIENT
PRO.n:CI
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PRomCf:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PRomCT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
.
.
STANLEY M. WHITE (Cont'd)
McDERMOTT
1500 Fe Saturation Diving System
Louisiana
f)csign of skid package for 15 man system One chamber could he launched as an emergency vesseL
ORBA CORPORATION
Conversion to Coal Transshipment Telminal
South Carolina
PaJiieipation in leasihility study and detailed design for coal loading terminal in Cliarleston.
INTERNATIONAL MARINE TERMINALS
Coal Transshipment Terminal
Louisiana
Detailed design for 15 MTPY coal transshipment terminal including 150 KDWT dock with 7000
TPH traveling ship-loader and two 4000 TIIP staeker/reclaimers.
ORBA CORPORATION
Dry Bulk Terminal
North Carolina
Participation in feasihilitv study (or dry hulk terminal at Radio Island
PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS
Marine Facilities
New Jersey
^bovc and underwater inspection, evaluation and prdiminaI)' and tinal dcsit.Jfl for the rehahilitation
of the marine facilities at the Scwarcn (feDerating Station. Project included 700 lcet or sheet pile
hulkheads, three sheet pile cells. eight timher dolphins, unloading plaUorm and coal unloading dock
relieving platt()ITn.
FLORIDA LImn CORPORA nON
Storm Surge Mudel
Florida
I ~valuated stOlm surge model and results for nuclear power plant site.
W. F. WYMAN POWER STATION
Thermal Discharge System
Maine
Physical model study of effluent's interaction with a deep tidal hay.
CZM
State of Maine
Advisory Commission that provide"" all pOlis in state with technical advice Il,r planning future
development. Specialty: harhor protection, including fixed and floating hreakwaters.
FREEHILL, HOGAN & MAHAR
Dock Damage
Variou:'i
Site SlU"vcys, cOIl."itIUction cost estimates and preliminary repair design of alleged damage to a numhcr
of marine facilities.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
.
.
STANLEY M. WHITE (Cont'd)
J RAY McDERMOTT (McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL)
Pipeline Stabilization
Kuwait
P1,1folmOO feasibility study related to the stabilization of six submarine pipelines which could not he
hWlcd by conventional methods. Pipeline diameters ranged between 18 and 48 inch. Designs in-
cluded special trenching techniques and undenvatcr reinforced eat1h heams.
AZZAWIY A REFINING COMPANY
Breakwater J:ailun.::
Libya
Analy/ro hrcak'\vatL"f to detcmtinc call~ offailurc; redesign, model study, technical specifications for
its reconstruction at ALzawiya.
EXXON RESEARCH & ENGINEERING
Demolition of On:...l1orc Structure
Libya
Study and cost estimate lor demolition and removal of VLCC bow mooring tower at Marsa cll3rcga.
SOFEC,INC.
Single Point Moorings
Denmark
Detailed design of a single anchor leg mooring lor military tankers up to 35 KDWT at lJndersted.
AZZA Wry A REFINING COMPANY
Single Point Moorings
Libya
Pct10nned feasihility study, prepared Tl.'llder Documents and assisted owner with contractor selection
for two single buoy mooring facilities at Ras LanufRcfincry.
McDERMOTT
Construction Supervision
( jcnnany
Coordinated the engineering and construction of an 1800 metric ton Idling portal crane that was built
in Ilamhurg tl.1f McDermott Scotland Fahrication Yard.
AMERADA HESS OIL COMPANY
Petroleum Products Terminal Rehahilitation
Virgin Islands
Detailed design of rcplaeement of loading platforms, catwalks, electrical systcm and piping systems
rlus cmdc oil, halla:-.t water and fresh water at Docks] and 2. Also included repair offender systems
and a new cathodic protection system.
DRA VO CORPORATION
Bulk I ,oading T elminal
Venezuela
Design cost cstimate and construction schedule for three altcrnative Iimcstone loading facilities in hi
Yaca!.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
CONSULTANTS,INC
JOHN C. ROBERGE. P.E.
PROJECT MANAGER
EDUCATION
Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Master of Engineering, Coastal & Oceanographic Engineering
PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION
Licensed Professional Engineer
State of Rhode Island
State of Connecticut
State of New York (Pending)
American Society of Civil Engineers
National Society of Professional Engineers
Connecticut Society of Professional Engineers
World Ocean Dredging Association
NAUI/PADI Scuba Certification
OSHA 19 I 0.120 HazMat Supervisor Training
PUBLICATIONS
"Performance of a Jetty-Weir Inlet Improvement Plan", with JA Purpura, B.C. Beechley, and
C.W. Baskette, Proceedings of the 14th Coastal Engineering Conference, American Society
of Civil Engineers, New York, 1975.
"Minimizing Wave Transmission Through Jettied Inlets", 25th Annual Hydraulic Specialty
Conference Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers, Texas A&M University,
August 1977.
Hydraulic Model Studies for the Expansion of the Port of Cham peri co, Guatemala, with J. T.
Kirby, Technical Report 122-77/M350CF, Alden Research Laboratory, Worcester
Polytechnic Institute, September 1977.
"An Evaluation of Porous Dike Intake Screening Systems", EPA/EPRI Workshop on Larval
Exclusion Systems for Power Plant Intakes, EPA and EPRI, San Diego, February 1978.
Investigation of a Thermal Plume in a Shallow River: Cooling Pond Blowdown Discharge,
Midland Nuclear Power Station, with RG. Nyquist, Technical Report 45-79/M I 23AF, Alden
Research Laboratory, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 1979.
35 Corporate Drive, Trumbull. CT 06611 (203) 268-5007 FAX 268-8821
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
JOHN Co ROBERGE. P.E. (Cont'd)
The Technical Feasibility of Grayel Transport by Hydraulic Pioelines in the Arctic Winter,
with M. Burnett and DB. Walker, SOHIO Petroleum Company, Report HQ-DEP-1304,
Dallas, October ]984.
Dimensioning of the Spent Fuel Pool for Installation of Maximum Density Fuel Storage
Racks, Maine Yankee Nuclear Station, Maine Yankee Power Company, Augusta, February
]993.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
CLIENT
PROJECT
IDCA TION
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCA TION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
u.S. NAVY
Inspection and Repair of Pile Jaekct Systems
Groton, Connecticut
Conducted underwater inspection of Pier 17 and developed remedial pile jacketing procedures for over
1 50 steel and concrete piles. Installed rigid fiherglass, flexihle bag, and unique combination concrete
tilled jaekeLs Provided all engineering services duting constIuetion including field design changes, cost
estimates, condition and as-huilt drawings, and liason with the U.S. Navy.
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY
Evaluation and Design of Breakwater Structures
Port Sheldon, Michigan
PCIfoTTIled a detailed wave refraction analysis, field data acquisition program, and comprehensive scale
hydraulic model studies to optimize the type, size, and orientation of jetty-breakwater strueturcs to
minimi/,e wave transmission through a recreational small hoat navigation channel. Studies included
detailcd cost analyses of altemative plans.
u.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Coastal Engineering Analysis of Ponce de Leon Inld
Daytona Beach, Florida
Detailed analysis of the littoral climate along the cast coast of Florida was conducted to detelmine the
impact of the jdty-weir structures upon the stability of the navigation channel and upon the adjacent
he aches. This work included a wave refraction and energy distribution analysis, an analysis of wave
dilliaction eflCcts, an historical evaluation of channel orientation and shoaling patterns, a sediment and
CWTcnt tracing program, and a structural stahility analysis. This work was used to develop maintenance
schedules and budgets and to evaluate the efTeetiveness of the jetty-weir sand-bypassing scheme.
TOWN OF WARREN, RI
Design of Municipal Wharf Facihties
WalTen, Rhode Island
Design of shcetpilc wharl' s~ucture, floating dock facilitics, and dredging of mooring area in the W8ITen
River. Wharf consisted of driven sheetpile structure filled with drcdged material. StlUeture included a
free Howing culvert located in the intertidal zone to maintain tidal flow throughout each tidal cycle and
to ensure no dq,~'adation of water quality. Work included preparation of alllJSACOE, State, and local
permit applications. Construction documents were prepared it)f phased operations to accommodate
municipal budgetary constraints. Project was noted for significantly enhancing thc locallishing industry
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
I,OCATION:
SCOPE:
.
.
JOHN Co ROBERGE. P.E. (Coot'd)
CT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Construction or DEI' Marine Patrol Docking Faeililtes
Old Lyme, COllilc"tieot
Installed over 2000 If of elevated timher hoardwalk. 200 If commercial pier 1()unded on driven timher
riles, SOOO sf of floating dock structures, fuel storage and sanitary hoat pump-out facilities. This ,\fork
also included dredging of the patrol hoat and research vessel herthing areas and driving over 500 If or
steel shcctpilc to fOlm the wharf and vessel staging area. Developed site alternative design for shcctpilc
bulkhead atlcr an extensive submerged timher crihbing structure was discovered along the driving line.
The remedial plan im.:luJcd removal of isolated sections of the crihbing by divers, hack tilling with [l
coarse blend and driving the original wall.
U.S. NAVY
Underwater Installation of Antenna Test Plat[onn
Fisher's Island, Nc\\" York
Precisely placed 60 ton platl()ml at35 It depth, including design and installation of stecl pile anchoring
system. Work included establishing shore based precision survey and marine locating station, dredging
of platfonTI site, undclwatcr cutting and welding of positioning hardware, concrete and armor stone
placement, and pile driving.
LONG 1SLAND LIGHTING COMPANY
Rehabilitation OrNOlihport Oil Platform
NorthpOl1, Nc\v York
Complete rehabilitation of off.,hore oil ofT loading platJ()rm included epo"y coating of all structural steel,
pwnping compont.'TIts, and underwater support piles. Designed innovative scafTolding system to suppol1
concrete deck repairs and intertidal pile remediation. Primary activities included the undel~'alcr repair
and cpox-)' coating of over 160 cylindrical steel piles and installation of cathodic protection ~1'stcm.
PROVIDENCr: & WORCESTER RAILROAD
Design or Dredged Material Disposal FaCIlity
Providence, Rhode Island
Design of 500,000 ey capacity dredged material disposal faeihty was completed to support the proposed
dredging of the South Quay marine facilily in the upper Providence Ilarhor. The design included an outlet
control \-veir and internal baffle system ,,,,hich assured less than 5 ppm suspended solids in the discharge
flow. Optimization study detcnnined the maximum size dredge and drcdging rates 10 ensure
environmental compliance during all phases of the dredging program.
U.S. ARMY CORI'S OF ENGINEERS
Dredging and Beach Restoration at Montauk l,ake Inlet
Montauk, New York
Complete pn~lcct oversight and constmction included dredging or approximately 70,000 cy of sand II-om
thc outer channel and inlet throat of this popular recreational harhor of refuge and an additional 12,000
cy of material from the U.S. Coast Guard hCI1hing area. Dn..-dged material was placed on the adjacent
heaehes hy conveying the dredged material through a pipeline suhmerged beneath the channeL
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLlI~NT
PROJECT:
LOCA nON
SCOPE:
CI.IENT
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CI.IENT
PROJECT:
LOCA nON
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCAr/ON
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CI.IENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPic'
.
.
JOHN C. ROBERGE. P.E. (Cont'd)
SUFFOLK COUNTY. NY
Dredging of Mud Creek Navigation Channel
Bahylon. New York
Emergency dredging of this commercial channel was required following a severe sllllm which resulted
in extensive shoaling and limited operating depths. Constmcted a dredged material disposal facihty,
mohilized a shallow drall dredge, ",mstmeted a 3000 If pipelme, and dredged over 45,000 ey ofmatenal
in twelve (12) days.
U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Dredging ofWetliersfield Cove Navigation Channel
Wcthersticld, Connecticut
Dredged over 15,O()() cy of river deposits Irom this recreational channel. Dredged malt..:rial was
dischru-ged onto the seasonal shoals and allowed to disperse into the COlillccticut River. This disposal
technique assured that the disposal operatIOn would have minimal impact upon the more sensitive
environment within the Wethersfidd Cove harhor of refuge and the sWTOlll1ding wetlands.
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Dredging of Old Ilarhor and State Beach Restoration
Block Island, Rhode Island
Dredged approximately GO,OOO c~' of sediment trorn the commercial navigation channel and berthing
facilities. Conductt:d pre and post dredging hydrographic sUlveys including verification of survey control
stations. Placed dredged material on adjacent recreational heaches to rernediate severe erosion and 10
protect hackshorc stmcturcs from potential wave damage.
CITY OF IDRAIN, OHIO
Dredging and Beach Restoration of WateIii:ont Park
torain, Ohio
Dredged over 40,000 cy from an offshore shoaling area in the lee of a series of detached breakwater
structures, pumped ilie dredged material approximately 4200 If to the eroded heaeh. Placed tlie dredged
matc'lial <m the beach lacc along 1.5 mi ofilie Watetihmt Park heach, graded the heaeh face, and prepared
the facility for recreational use.
U.S, HUREAU OF MINI'S
Mine Backlilling Program to Minimize Suhsidence
Roek Springs, Wyoming
I--li:-.tolical dCt.--p coal mining operations beneath Rock Springs resulted in suhsidcmx of the surface grade
and severe damage to community infrastmcture. The deslgn of the haekfilling program included the
openingofa I,OOO,OOOcy gravel pit operation, construction ofa slun)' pipeline to convey the gravel2.S
mi and installation of injector wells to pump the gravel slun)' into the derelict mine voids.
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Design oflidallnlct Sand Bypassing System
Mexico Beach, Florida
Developed slurry pipeline and jet pump injector design criteria as basis for 11 sand bypassing system to
minimize navigation channel shoaling and to artificially maintain littoral transport arollnd stlUcturally
improved tidal inlets. Design included pump and prime movers, slun)' pipeline system, all
instmmentation and controls, and development of operational procedures. Work included complete
analysis llf site wave climatology, sediment transport anal)'ses, and hydrographic surveys.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLIENT
PROJECT:
I,OCATION
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PRomCT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PRomCT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE
.
.
JOHN Co ROBERGE. r.E. (Cont'd)
CITY OF WARWICK, RI
Design of Bmshncck Cove Dredging Program
Warwick, Rhode Island
Designed a recreational boating channel, required dredging program, and associated dredged material
disposal facility f(n" this tidal cove in the upper NUlTagansctt Bay. Work also included an extensive
hydrographic survey of the projt."Cl site, geotechnical explorations and analyses of the marine site and
upland disposal sites, design of a pipeline crossing, and preparation of alllJSACOE, Slate. and local
pcmlit applications.
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Design of Sand Bypassing System and Beach Restoration
Oceanside, California
Based upon lahoratol)' and empirically developed operating and design int()lmation, developed the
design of a jet pump dredging and sand hypassing system. This system fOlmeu the nueleus of fin
extensive beaeh maintenance program and served to maintain operating depths in the inlet of the
Oceanside I Iarbor navigation channel.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Development of an I Iydraulic Pipeline Conveyor System
Olliec of Coal Mining
Devdopcd design !<lr pipeline transport system lor conveying coarse coal out of surface coal mines. Study
included a detailed h:chnieal and cost feasihility analysis as \vell as exhaustive site application analysis
at sul1'aee coal mines in Illinois, Colorado, and Wyoming.
RUST REME])]AL SERVICES INc.
Closure and Capping of Berkley Landfill
Berkley, Massachusetts
This project included thc exhtunation and placement of over 50,000 ey of municipal and industrial solid
waste onto the closed landfill, importing over 150,000 cy of backfill to create optimum slopes for
drainage, installation of over g40,OOO sf of HDPE cap to minimize leachate contamination of
grmmdwater, construction of 50,000 sf of sluny wall, and installation of a passivt:: gas clll1cction system
at a MA 2 I E landlill site. This work includcd preparation of IlazMat I Icalth and Safely Plan and
excavation of unknown drums.
SAFE IIARBOR WATER POWER COMPANY
Dcsign and Installation of Stoplog Gate Structures
Conestoga, Pennsylvania
Designed stop log gate stmclurc to enable dewatering of thc dmll tuhe and tailrace at a hydro-electric
turhine facility. Directed commercial divers during installation of the structure at 65 fi depth. Following
installation and subsequent dcwatl,'ting, conducted in~'Pcction of the C1.mcrctc tailrace walls and developed
concrete repair procedures.
CITY OF VIRGINIA REACH, VA
Dredging of Brigadoon Canal
Virginia Beach, VirgInia
ApproXimately 6,000 cy of scdiment and trash was dredged [rom this shallow nood control canal to
maximi/.c capacity. Material was pumped up to 1,500 l[to a containment facility.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCA TION
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT
IDCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT'
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPIi:
.
.
JOHN C. ROBERGE. P.E. (Cont'd)
NIAGARA MOIIA WK POWl,R COMPANY
Design of Power Plant Cooling Watcr Intake Screen
Dunkirk, New York
Designed unique porous gravel intake screen structure to eliminate fish impingement ami trash
accumulation on traditional travchng screen structures. Work included development of water surface and
wind wave loading and ice impact criteria. Design was based upon the construction of a rubble-mound
hrcakwater structure to enclose the existing intake. Pcrfonncd laboratory studies to develop methods to
reduce frazil ice formation on water intake structun::.
LONG ISLAND I.IGHTING COMPANY
Inspcclion ami Repair orUnden.vater Concrete Gate and Water Intake Structure
Port Jefferson, New York
In:-'l1CCtion, design, and repair of stoplog gate stmeture, including Undel\\.atcr placement of over 60 cy of
7000 psi grout. Work included inspection of the concrete structure, specification of remediation
procedures, design or all repairs including concrete and steel structures, and oversight of construction
NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY
Rehahilitation of Power Plant Gate Stmctures
F ails Village, Connecticut
D1,1TIolition and replacement of l<:mr (4) submerged sluice gate structures, repair of spallcd and eroded
concrete sections of head gate and turhine draft tube sttuctures followed detailed inspection and
devdopment of repair procedures. 'W'ork also required the design of gate guides and guide anchoring
~1'stcm and the installation of electronic gate actuators. Provided complete construction O\'ersight and as-
built condition survey following completion of the remedial work.
SOllIO PETROLEUM COMPANY
Feasihility Analysis or Hydraulic Pipeline Transp0l1 or Gravel
I larrison Bay, Beaufort Sea, Alaska
Developed pipeline transport system for conveying mined gravel from land hased pits to artificial
exploration islands during the Arctic \\'inter. System included a gravel heating plant, pipeline injection
system, and insulated pipeline components. Analysis included technical feasihility as well as an analysis
of construction and operating costs.
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Design of Rudee Inlet Sand Bypassing System
Virginia Beach, Virginia
A fixed plant hydraulic dredge system was designed and installed to supplement the low wcir sand
bypassing ~'Ystcrn which was included in the jetty design of this inlet system. I .ittoral material was dredged
fi'Om Ule protc'Ctcd impoundment area and pwnpcd to the erodmg down drill heaehes. The design ineluded
a large slurry pumping system, instmmentation and controls, a 2 mi long pipeline, pile suppol1cd trestle
system, and an enclosurc.
IIARHlRD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Dredging or Fosler Branch Navigation Channel
Ilarrord County, Maryland
This tidal channel, located in the upper Chesapeake Bav, required dredging of approximately 25,000 ey
of sediments to provide safc and reliable access to recreational vessels. Material was conveyed over J,200
If to a containment facility. This work included complcte project oversight, hydrographic survCy'S, and
relalcd conslIuction management.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC,
I
I
I
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
I
I
I
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCA TION
SCOPE:
I
I
I
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
I
I
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
JOHN C. ROBERGE. P.E. CCont'd)
CITY OF FAIRFAX, V A
(Joose Creek Reservoir Dredging Program
Lecshurg, Virginia
^ccumulation of ri\'crnorne sediments in the Goose Creek Reservoir will require dredging or
approximately 250,000 cy of fine silt to maintain optimum storage volumes in this water supply lacility.
Wllll includes identiiYing ~md dcsif:.'l1ing alternative dredged material disposal sites as well as evaluating
pos.'\ihlc end uses fiJr the dredged material, design of the containment stmcturcs, and development or the
dredging (lpcrations plan.
IIARTFORD STI ';AM COMPANY
1 Jndclwatcr Intipcction of the Dutch Point Pump house
I Iattfllrd, Connecticut
An undcr\vak"f inspection ofstmctural ck.mcnts, pump and pipeline facilities, nnd accumulated trash and
sediments was conducted. This survey served as the hasis for desit,1fl of rcmedial stmctural repairs of
voncrete hame walls and dJiven shcctpile guide walls. Thc inspection repOli identified pipeline and pump
modifications which wcre required to optimize the pumphouse operation. ^ completc estimate of
construction costs was includcd as a part of the final inspection repmi.
NORnmAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY
Trash Mitigation at Water Intake Structure
Jlartl()rd, Connecticut
^ detailed analysis of surface How patterns and trash migration tendencies was conducted in the
Connecticut River at the intake structun..: of South Mcadow Station. This field data was employed as a
basis tor developing alternative structural modifications and operational procedures which would reduce
the intake of trash into the power plant cooling watcr system
INDUSTRI-PLEX REMEDIAL TRUST
Superfund Sitc Rcmediation and Wetland Restoration
WOhUlll, Massachusetts
This CERCLA site required extensive mechanical dredging of highly contaminated sediments.
Contaminants included animal hidc residues, arsenic, lead, and ()ther metals, methyl mcn..:aplan, and
hydrogen sulfide. Approximately 30,000 ey or materials will be dredged and placed beneath an onSlte
impervious cap as part of the site n..medialion. Over G.5 acres ofwctland \vill he reconstlUctcd, including
undelwatcr capping and suhsequent hackfilling of the dredged areas.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EDUCATION
.
.
CONSULTANTS,INC.
JOHN E. CHAPMAN. P.E.
PROJECT ENGINEER
University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION
Licensed Professional Engineer
State of Connecticut
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
CITY OF MILFORD
Flood Control Structure
Silver Sands Beach, Milford, Connecticut
Field Engineer for construction of timber spillway structure. Timber piles and
sheeting were driven to protect an existing beach area from a large box culvert
discharge which was part of an upland flood control project.
BRIDGEPORT AND PORT JEFFERSON STEAMBOAT COMPANY
Breasting Dolphin and Access Ramp Construction
Bridgeport, Connecticut
Construction of timber breasting dolphins, pile supported precast concrete loading
platform, and installation of vehicular unloading ramp for Long Island Ferry
operations in Bridgeport. Hydraulically actuated gangway attached to fixed pier
installed for loading/unloading of vehicles on ferry.
CITY OF BRIDGEPORT
Pleasure Beach Fishing Pier Rehabilitation
Bridgeport, Connecticut
Field Engineer including layout and as-built survey for rehabilitation of 700 ft. long
pile supported fishing pier extending into Bridgeport Harbor. Work included near
total replacement of structural framing and selective timber pile repair and
replacement.
35 Corporate Drive, Trumbull, CT 06611 (203) 268-5007 FAX 268-8821
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
-
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE
I
I
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
I
I
I
I
I
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
.
.
JOHN E. CHAPMAN (Cont'dl
HARBOUR LANDING DEVELOPMENT
Oyster Point and Traders Dock Marina
New Haven, Connecticut
Field Engineer including layout and as-built survey for construction oflarge marina
project consisting of timber wave fence construction, floating dock installation,
timber bulkheading, and pile supported travel lift pier construction
CANFIELD ISLAND ASSOCIATION
Canfield Island Traffic Bridge
Norwalk, Connecticut
Field Engineer for total reconstruction of a 315 ft deteriorated timber bridge
Work included layout and as-built survey for prefabricated hardwood bridge
installation which consisted of greenheart support piles driven to support
prefabricated hardwood bridge sections. Construction was performed without
interruption of vehicular access for island residents or emergency vehicles.
INLAND FUEL TERMINALS, INe.
Steel Sheet Pile Bulkhead at Marine Terminal
Bridgeport, Connecticut
Field Engineer including layout and as-built survey for construction of 250 linear
feet of steel sheet pile bulkhead anchored by conventional reinforced concrete
anchor wall
CITY OF BRIDGEPORT
Pleasure Beach Bridge Rehabilitation
Bridgeport, Connecticut
Field Engineer for partial demolition and reconstruction of timber pile supported
swing bridge constructed in early I no's.
CONSUMERS PETROLEUM, INe.
Timber Pile Dolphin Replacement
Bridgeport, Connecticut
Field Engineer for replacement of existing damaged 13-pile timber breasting
dolphin at tanker berth.
CASWELL COVE, 1Ne.
Housatonic River Marina Construction
Milford, Connecticut
Field Engineer including layout and as-built survey for construction of new marina.
Work included installation of concrete floating docks as well as layout and
installation of a steel pipe pile supported precast pier. Concrete filled steel pipe
piles for fixed pier were socketed into ledge to obtain 75 ton bearing capacity
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
.
.
JOHN E. CHAPMAN (Cont'd)
CITY OF MILFORD
Municipal Launching Ramp Reconstruction
Milford, Connecticut
Field Engineer for complete reconstruction of an existing municipal boat launching
ramp. Precast concrete plank sections installed on crushed stone bedding.
PECKHAM MATERIALS CORPORATION
Steel Sheet Pile Bulkhead
Stamford, Connecticut
Field Engineer for installation of 200 linear feet steel sheet pile bulkhead with
intermediate fender piles to protect material barges during unloading.
SAUGATUCK HARBOR YACHT CLUB
Travel Lift Pier
West port, Connecticut
Field Engineer for construction of 3 5 ton capacity timber pile supported travel lift
pier.
CITY OF STAMFORD
Cove Island Footbridge
Stamford, Connecticut
Field Engineer including layout and as-built survey for construction of
prefabricated galvanized steel framed concrete deck pedestrian footbridge. Project
included reconstruction of new stone masonry seawalls.
WE O'NIEL CONSTRUCTION
Stamford Harbor Park
Stamford, Connecticut
Field Engineer including layout and as-built survey for construction of 500 linear
feet of steel sheet pile bulkhead. The new bulkhead was driven as part of an office
building and marina complex on the East Branch of Stamford Harbor A 25 ft.
diameter circular cell was also constructed as part of the bulkhead project.
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Pile Supported Pier Rehabilitation
New Haven, Connecticut
Field Engineer for pile jacketing of pier support piles to extend service life and
selective replacement of timber bracing.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EDUCA nON
.
.
CONSULTANTS,INC.
RAMESH T. BUZETA
STRUCTURAL DESIGNER/SENIOR DRAFTSMAN
City college of New York
REPRESENT A nVE PROJECTS
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCA nON
SCOPE
Mobil Oil Corporation
Barge Berth
New York
Members of inspection team performing detailed inspection, developing repair
scheme, and preparing drawings for bulkhead repairs for rehabilitation of a
barge berth.
U.S. Navy
Ammunition Pier Upgrading
New Jersey
Member of inspection team performing detailed inspection, developing repair
scheme, and preparing drawings for concrete deck repairs of 7,000 ft long
Pier lrrrestle I and 2,300 ft long Pier 2/Trestle 2 a Naval Weapons Station.
Sirte Oil Company
Harbor Rehabilitation
Libya
Drafting for rehabilitation of LNG terminal facilities and harbor expansion, at
Marsa el Brega. Precast prestressed concrete loading platforms and precast
caisson-type breakwater
Exxon Company, USA
Fender System
Texas
Detailing and drafting of an independent fender system for Dock I at Exxon
Baytown Refinery. Fender system will accommodate barges and tankers up
to 43 MDWT
35 Corporate Drive, Trumbull. CT 06611 (203) 268-5007 FAX 268-8821
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
pROJI eCT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPI':
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
I,OCATlON
SCOPE
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
.
.
RAMESH T. BUZETA (Conl'd)
Illtcmational Marine TcnninaIs
Coal T ctminal
I Jouisiana
I)ralling and dClailing ()f n barge to ship coal transshipment tC1l11inaJ with [) capacity of 15,000,000 tons
per yc.:ar on the 100vcr Mississippi River.
Sorce, Inc.
Onshore Mooring
Malaysia
Drafting fi.lr a single anchor leg lTI(xlting in 300 ft water depth at Tcmhungo. This was the deepest water
SALM to he buill a thaI lime.
Philadelphia Port COlV.
Pennsylvania
Port Impnwcmcnts
Inspection of the twelve Cily owned piers in the POlioI' Philadelphia. Dralhng fix rchahilitating Picr ')()
l{)r use as an automohile impol1ing facility.
ChwcmlTIcnl ()f Mnlaysia
LNG/Harbor
Malavsia
Drafting of a tenmnal for loading 125,000 cubic meter LNG tankers, including tanker berth, breakwater,
trestle and causeway at Bintulu.
Old North WhmfCompony
Whmi'Rehabilitalion
Nantucket
I,ayout and uraning for nn analysis study of design effect on a historic sliUctural rehabilitation and
impn)vcmcnt.
Mobil Oil C{lrp()rali()l1
Pier Rehabilitation
NC\\i York
Layout, detailing, and drafting of hreasting dolphins, pier render rchahilitntiol1, and replacement or
mooring dolphin at Ncwhurgh Tcnninal.
U.S. Navy
Pier and Trestle
New Jersey
Inspection and drafting fex a finger piL't" and connecting trc!-.tlc, including utility services, at Naval Weapon
Station 1 ~arlc. The pier features a unique partial douhle deck concept and all vertical pile stmctural
system.
Mobil Oil Corporation
Iircasting I)()lphin Replacement
New York
Layout, detailing and drafting of the new south breastmg dolphin on the tanker bel1h at Port Mobil
Reline!}' in Staten Island.
Bridgep0l1/Pol1 JeITerson Fen] Company
Ferry Dock
Connecticut
Detailing and drat\ing of dock, vehicle ramp, and pile clusler replacement in Bridgepol1 TemlinaL
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC,
I
I CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
I SCOPE:
CLlENT
I PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
I CLIENT
PROJI':CT:
I LOCATION
SCOPE:
I CLII'NT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
I SCOPE:
CLIENT:
I PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
I CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCA TION
I SCOPE:
I CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCA nON:
SCOPE:
I CLIENT:
PROJECT:
I I DCATlON
SCOPE:
CLlENT:
I PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
I
I
I
I
.
.
RAMESH T. BUZETA (Coot'd)
Inlond Fuel Compony
Spill Prevention
Connecticut
Research, preparation of pC1l11its, and detail design of underwater oil boom which features no
demobilization during traJTic and a permanent emergency precaution.
American 13ridgc C~)fnpany
Bridge Picr Protection
C(mncdicul
Detailing and uraning for replacement of channel fender system and rehabilitation or electrical tower
foundation in Cos Cob for the Metro N011h - New Haven Railway.
Marketing Corporation of America
Marina Modernization
Connecticut
Preparation ofpcnnil", design detailing and drafting for expansion or marina l':.Icility including dredging.
Mobil Oil Corporation
Petroleum Piers
Vermont
Preparation of inspection drawings of cellular and rectangulm- piers for elUde oil and petroleum at refinery
in Hurlinghm.
Various
Ilorhor Dredging
C(mnecticut
Planning, preparation of pennits, and dclailing of dredging and disposal for Connecticut I Iarhors.
Drakes ^ssociates
Bridge Channcllnspection
New York
Responsihle 1i)r data pmcessing of inspection surveys gathered to he used fiJr a study analysis and update
of various hridge waterways in New York State.
Town orWestp()11
Inlet/Pond Preservation
Connecticut
Inspection, detoilmg and drafting for reploeement of tide gotes in Sherwood Mill Pond.
Sorce, Ine
()fl:"horc Mooring
Molysio
Detailing and dralling for a catenmy: anchor leg mooring ror petroleum product tankers at Trcngganu.
Mobil Oil COlporation
Pier Rehabilitation
Connecticut
Inspcction, detailing ond dralling of bulkheod ond fender repmr ot New Ilo\'en Rclinery mm-ine telminat
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
CONSULTANTS,INC
TIM DEBARTOLOMEO. P.E.
ENGINEER
EDUCATION
University of Connecticut
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION
Licensed Professional Engineer
State of Connecticut
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE
United Illuminating Company
Rehabilitation of Oil Dock
New Haven, CT
Underwater and above water inspection and computer model of Oil Dock.
The Oil Dock was originally constructed in 1928. Project Engineer for design
of repairs and Field Engineer for Construction Management team of
rehabilitation to timber pile foundation.
CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE
Town of West port
Modernization of Marine Facilities
Compo Yacht Basin, Westport, CT
Project Engineer for design of modifications to marine facilities. Work
included the addition of concrete floating docks secured by steel piles, the
design of an additional access pier, and modification to existing structures.
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
Mobil Oil Company
Upgrade to Existing Oil Terminal
South Portland, Maine
Project Engineer for site survey and structural analysis of existing structures.
Project included the design of new mooring dolphins and the design of
modifications to existing breasting dolphins. Field Engineer for construction
of new structures, including new accessways and modifications to existing
structures.
35 Corporate Drive, Trumbull, CT 06611 (203) 268-5007 FAX 268-8821
I
I CLIENT:
PROJECT:
I LOCATION
SCOPE
I
I CLIENT:
PROJECT
I LOCATION:
SCOPE:
I
I CLIENT
PROJECT
I LOCATION
SCOPE
I
CLIENT
I PROJECT:
LOCATION
SCOPE:
I
CLIENT
I PROJECT:
LOCATION:
I SCOPE:
I CLIENT
PROJECT
LOCATION
I SCOPE
I
I
I
.
.
TIM DEBARTOLOMEO (cont'd)
City of New York - Department of Sanitation
Inspection of Marine Transportation Station Fender Systems
New York City
Inspection of seven Marine Transportation Stations to determine the as-built
and existing conditions of the vessel fender systems. Work included detailed
drawings of the each site supplemented by a report to describe the adequacy
of each fender system. Subsequent work will involve design of upgrades and
improvements to the marine facilities.
Halpern Building Corporation
Office Building at 301 Hamilton Avenue
White Plains, NY
Project Engineer for design of two office towers; one ten and one fifteen
story. Towers were connected by a seven level parking structures. Project
included a 64 foot span, 20 foot deep, plate girder and two concrete cores for
the main wind resisting system
Wyckoff Hospital
Hospital Expansion
Brooklyn, NY
Project Engineer for design of a five story vertical addition, a five story
horizontal addition plus a twelve story elevator tower. Project also included
structural modifications to the existing building.
Village of Mount Kisco
Mount Kisco Police and Court Facilities
Mount Kisco, NY
Field Engineer for construction of steel pile foundation for one-story precast
concrete and steel framed structure.
Beechnut Corporation
Beechnut Food Processing Plant
Canajoharie, NY
Investigation and analysis of existing three story concrete buildings; including
load tests and deflection monitoring.
Flakt Inc
Flue Gas Desulferization Plant
Tokyo,Japan
Computer modelling and structural design of plant superstructure. Braced
steel frames was the main wind resisting system. Plant was a secondary
pollution treatment for an industrial process
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EDUCA TION
.
.
CONSULTANTS,INC.
JOHN V. BAZZONI. JR.
PROJECT MANAGER
Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, CT
Bachelor of Science in Construction Engineering Technology
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
Lexington Hotel Corporation
Showboat Hotel
Greenwich, CT
Project Manager for replacement of existing bulkhead with new 650 LF
sheet pile bulkhead including drilled in tie-backs and horizontal tie-backs
with concrete deadmen.
Metro North Commuter Railroad
American Bridge Company (General Contractor)
Rehabilitation ofCos Cob Bridge over the Mianus River
Greenwich, CT
Project Manager for replacement of concrete foundations for transmission
towers (4). Work was performed beneath towers via temporary support
structures and cofferdams without interrupting service. Approximately 500
cubic yards of concrete was poured. Additionally timber fender systems
and catwalks were rehabilitated.
Metro North Commuter Railroad
Cianbro Corporation (General Contractor)
Devon Bridge Rehabilitation
Stratford-Milford, CT
Project Manager for rehabilitation of existing timber fender systems.
Town of West port, CT
Marina Rehabilitation (Compo Cove, E.R. Strait)
West port, CT
Project Manager for the following work:
At Compo Cove; installation of new launching ramp including precast
concrete planks supported by structural steel and pipe piles.
At E.R. Strait; installation of new sheet pile bulkhead (110 LF) including
tie-backs and concrete deadman.
35 Corporate Drive, Trumbull, CT 06611 (203) 268-5007 FAX 268-8821
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATIONS:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
SCOPE
CLIENT:
PROJECT
LOCATION:
SCOPE:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
SCOPE
.
.
JOHN V. BAZZONI. JR (Cont'd)
City of Stamford, CT
Cummings Park Fishing Pier Renovation
Stamford, CT
Project Manager for rehabilitation of fishing pier, including bent bracing,
pile repair, stringers, decking and handrails due to deterioration and storm
damage.
The Dock, Inc.
The Dock Shopping Center, Marina Expansion
Stratford, CT
Project manager for installation of floating docks with steel pipe and timber
piles as well as timber pile dolphins and access piers
The Country Club of Fairfield
Erosion Control at Southport Harbor
South port, CT
Project manager for installation of 200 LF Gabion bulkhead.
Memoli & Memoli c/o UST Bank
Parcell's Marina Rehabilitation
Bridgeport, CT
Project manager for rehabilitation of floating docks including wave
attenuator and guide piles.
Sikorsky Aircraft
THP Group, Inc. (General Contractor)
Fuel Calibration Facility II - Fdn Piling
Project manager for installation of approximately 4000 LF of foundation
piles.
City of New Haven, CT
Long Wharf Rehabilitation
New Haven, CT
Project manager for rehabilitation of pier including demolition of existing
pier topping, installation of approximately 650 LF of II '6" wide concrete
slab topping for access of docks. Work also included re-setting of
displaced armor stone, installation of utilities, rehabilitation of timber piers,
and installation of new concrete floating docks
United States Coast Guard
Waterfront Structures Repair, Station New Haven
New Haven, CT
Project manager for removal of existing timber floating docks and piles,
replacement with new concrete floating docks and rock socketed guide
piles. Also included was rehabilitation of existing pier and wave screen.
OCEAN AND COASTAL CONSULTANTS. INC.
.
11./94
Mailed to all on list except for the following which Ruth Oliva
faxed copies to:
Cashin Associates
John Robson
Greenman Pedersen, Inc.
/
Louis Saulino
Maguire Group
Gregory Greene
Chashin Associates
Philip Sears
Allee, King, Rosen & Fleming Inc.
Aram Terchunian
First Coastal Corp
.
.
.
COUNCILMEN
Town HaJI. 53095 Main Road
p. O. Box 11 79
Southold. New York 11971
Telephone (516) 765 - 1891
Fax (516) 765 - 1823
SUPERVISOR
Thomas H. Wickham
Joseph J. Llzewski
Alice J. Hussie
Joseph L. Townsend. Jr.
Ruth D. Oliva
Juslice Louisa P. Evans
TOWN BOARD
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Dear Madam/Sir:
Enclosed is the list of data that the Town has acquired over the
years. The list was requested by those that were present at the
pre-bid conference. In order to be absolutely fair, we decided
that everyone on the list for RFP's should receive the same
list. We hope this listing of the available data base will be
he'lpful in your bid process for the Harbor Management and
Erosion Studies for the Town of Southold.
Sincerely,
~~
Ruth Oliva
Deputy Supervisor
.
HARBOR MANAGEMENT
Listing of available data
.
1. Mattitick Inlet Study with map of the watershed analysis.
2. Inventory of Natural Resoutces of Mattituck Inlet.
3. LWRP Policy 2 - Water Dependent uses.
4. Parking study of Marinas.
5. Development in Marine Zones.
6. Water quality Assessment.
7. Road run-off study plus addendum from Shellfish Advisory
Committee.
8. Aerial maps from 1988 and 1993.
9. Land use map - Zoning map.
lO.MI and MIl ordinances.
11.Site plans of some Marinas.
l2.RPPW Master Plan studies.
13.Listing of properties that have Trustee permits for
docks,bulkheads,jetties groins and houses.
l4.List of moorings.
.
.
Erosion
List of available data
1. Natural Erosion Protective Features (Inventory-General Town
wide).
2. Dredging information.
3. FEMA - maps and regulations.
4. Ordinances for bluff and wetland setbacks.
5. LWRP Policy 12 - Natural Erosion Protective Features.
6. LWRP Policy 15 - Waterfront Fortifications.
7. The Failure of Goldsmith Jetty.
8. Aerial maps of Southold - 1988 and 1993.
9. Listing of properties that have Trustee permits -
docks,bulkheads,jetties groins and houses.
10.Moorings.
11.Some historic data on Goldsmith's jetty.
.
.
/9<'-'
; /'
OLKO ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS. DESIGNERS
136 WEST 21 STREET
NEW YORK, N.Y 10011
U.S.A.
CABLE: OLKODESCON NY
STEPHEN M. OLKO
PRINCIPAL
TELEX: 226000 ETLX UR-ATTN OLKO
FAX' (212) 243-9743
TEL: (212) 645-9898
RECF!VED
NOV 1 ? 19<)<1
Southolrl Town (lprk
November 14, 1994
Ms. Judith T. Terry
Town Clerk
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Proposals For:
1. Harbor Management Plan
2. Erosion Management Plan
Dear Ms. Terry,
Thank you for inviting us to submit two proposals to the town
of Southold, to develop 1) A Harbor Management Plan and 2) An
Erosion Management Plan.
Unfortunately, because of other commitments, we will not be
able to complete either study by the March 31, 1995 deadline.
Thank you for contacting us. Hopefully, our schedules will
mesh better on some other, future project.
Sincerely,
~ 111 V/~
S.M. 01ko
t-i~GROU~
. T7cfJ - //1
$. \ ACEC Member
Supporting Excellence
....' In Engineering
Holzmacher, McLendon & Murrell, P.c. . IUM Associates, Inc.
H2M Construction Management, Inc. . H2M Labs, Inc.
575 Broad Hollow Road, Melville, NY 11747-5076
(516) 756-8000 . Fax, (516) 694-4122
November 16, 1994
RECEIVED
NOV 1 7 1994
Ms. Judnh T. Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
50,,""'1,.1 T ~wn ('I..'"
RE: Request for Proposal for Consulling Services to Develop a
Local Erosion Management Plan.
Dear Ms. Terry:
After reviewing the documents regarding the above referenced project we are unable to submn a
proposal at this time.
We appreciate having had the opportunny to submn a proposal and would be most interested in
being considered for future projects wnh the Town of Southold.
Very truly yours,
HOL.Jt'., A. CHER, MCLE~DOl& URRELL, P.C.
MJ? //UtJUL . 'IdJ
Rosema~uro .;
Proposals Manager .{/ f v
RS:ppt
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS
PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS SURVEYORS
~
.
.
LEGAL NOTICE
REQUEST FOR
PROPOSALS
NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIVEN that the Town Board of
the Town of Southold is Re-
questing Proposals for con-
sulting services to develop
a Local Erosion Manage-
ment Plan for the Town of
Southold to focus on a
townwide study of flooding'
and erosion and a detailed ex-
examination of the shoreline reach
extending from Duck Pond Point
to Horton Point in theTownship of
Southold, New York.
Proposal Specifications may be
obtained from Judith Terry,
Southold town Clerk, Town Hall,
53095 Main Road, Southold, New
Y orl< 11971, during regular business
hours. It is the responsibility of
each proposer, before submitting a
Proposal,to examine the specifica-
tions and to reflect the information
contained therein in the Proposal.
Proposals shall be submitted in
a narrative furmat, describing the
work to be perfoimed, the estin1lifed .
time to perform such wor~ atld ii'
rate schedule showing the ho~ly
rates for the work, together with a
maximum price for the performance
of each task. The proposal shall also
include a resume of the firm and its
principals and a list of references
showing the satisfactory perfor-
mance ofsimilarjobs.
All requests for Proposals must
be signed and sealed in envelopes
plainly marked "Request for Pro-
posal- Loca1 Erosion Management,
Plan" and submitted to the Office,
of the Town Clerk. RFP's will be re-
ceived by the Town Clerk until
1l:00A.M., Tuesday,December6,
1994, at which time they will be
opened and read aloud in public.
Proposals shall not be qualified,
modified, limited or restricted in any
way. Incomplete proposals will not
be considered.
A pre-submission conference
will be held on November 17, 1994'
all :00 P.M., at the Southold Town
Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,
NewYorl< 11971.
Dated: November I, 1994
JUDITHT. TERRY
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
Ix-I 1110/94
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
STA~'E OF NEW YORK ss:
Patricia Wood, being duly sworn,
says that she is the Editor, of the
TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public
newspaper printed at Southold, in
Suffolk County; and that the notice
of which the annexed is a printed
copy, has been published in said
Traveler-Watchman once each week
for /
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . weeks
~~~~~~~~:' commencing
on
the
day of
1 9 :9.'(. . .
..7?~.......,
.--. .
. .)/~~. d=~ o~efore
me
on
this
.............~~.....,
9"
19.. .r
......... .~anl.~~..
Notary Public
BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER
NOTARY PUBLIC, Stile 01 New Yorfc
No. 4806846
Qualified in Suffolk County
Cum mISSion Expires F? /3,/96
LI!XiALMnK,;&.
UQUESr ro.. PlOPOSALs
N011CE IS HEREBY GIVEN that I
the Town Board of the Town of
Southold is Requesting Proposals
for consulting services to develop a
Lota. Erosion Management Plan
for the Town of SouthaJd to focus on
a townwide study of flooding and ero-
sion and a detailed examination of the
shoreline reach extending from Duck
Pond Point to Horton Point in the
Township of Southold. New Yark.
Proposal Specifications may be
obtained from Judith Terry, Soutbold
Town Clerk. Town Hall, 53095 Main
Road, Southald, New York 11971
during regular business hours. It is th~
responsibility of each proposer,
be~ore submitting a Proposal, to ex-
amIDe the specifications and to reflect
the infonnation contained therein in
lb. Proposal.
Proposals shall be submitted in a
narrative format. describing the warle
to be perfonned, the estimated time to
)lOIfona ..... woo..aod a rale schod-
. .. ..... !be .~ _ for !be
-. ......... wilb aliloximum price
.... ... ,...,.,..,. of..... __ n.
proposaJ shall also Include a _
of the finn and its, principals and a list
of referonces showing !be satisfactory
perfOl1DlUlcc of similar jobs.
. AU Requesls for Proposals must be
SIgned and sealed in envelopes plainly
marked MRequest for Proposal _
~ ~~ Ma.i&geIDent Plan",
STATE OF NEW YIK)
) ss:
COUNTY OF SUFTOIK )
of Mattltuck,
In said County, being duly swom, lIllYll that he/me Is
Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOlK TIMFS. a Weekly
Newspaper, published at Mattltuck. In the Town of
Southold, County of SuHolk and State of New York,
and that the Notice of which the annexed Is a
printed copy, has been regularly published In said
Newspaper once each week for L weeks
~Wm:]1ng on the ~ day of
Principal Oerk
Notary Public
Swom t~lJ~1s Jq~ -
daYOf~~
.
9 November 1994
RECEIVED
NOV 1 4 1994
Ms. Judith Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Southold r Own Clerk
Dear Ms. Terry:
11v!1l-
Thank you for sending us a proposal for consulting services to develop a Local Erosion
Management Plan.
We would very much like to work with your town on any architectural, planning or
interior design projects. Unfortunately, we do not develop local erosion management
plans.
Thank you for thinking of us.
Sincerely,
1l~~~n~ /Lltl^-
Associate
Beyer
Bhnder
Belle
Architects & Planners
41 East 11 Street
New York. New York 10003
212 777 7800
.
9 November 1994
RECEIVED
NOV 1 4 1994
Ms. Judith Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Southo'd Town CI~rk
Dear Ms. Terry:
115 ~~-
Thank you for sending us a proposal for consulting services to develop a Local Erosion
Management Plan.
We would very much like to work with your town on any architectural, plarming or
interior design projects. Unfortunately, we do not develop local erosion management
plans.
Thank you for thinking of us.
Sincerely,
']z~~~n~ aAf^-
Associate
..
.4 )i..._~\c"l-
Blillder
I ) l'l
!w e
,.\ Li,li'LI.-r,
: < .".;, )."~~
NOU-09-1994 15:40 FROM
.
TO
8-90041J-5167651823
P.01
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE
DIVISION OF COASTAL RFSOURCES AND WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION
162 WASHINGTON AVENUE
ALBANY. NEW YORK 12231
. Phone: (518) 474-6000
FAX: (518) 473-2464
FAX MESSAGE
TO:
Ruth ODva
FROM:
Steve Ridler
DATE:
November 9.1994
MESSAGE:
Here are two more consultants, they should receive the harbor
management RFP. I should be able to send you some more soon.
Numbw of sh_ (lncludiD& cover poae): 1-
If then is a queotioa or plObl_ call: Steve RidJeo: lit (S18) 47406000
FRElI'i: URBAN HRRBORS INST.
.0:
NOV.1~ - 9:-~ 1191B 1".01
'URBAN HARBORS INSTITUTE
Fax:
Telephone:
(617)287-5575
(617)287-5570
FAX ANNOUNCEMENT'
DATE: November 8, 1994
TO: Steve Ridler
FAX NO: (51')473-2464
FROM: Jack Wiggin
NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: 0
COMMENTS: Private consultants with harbor planning experience:
Jack Mettee
Appledore Engineering
600 State Street, Suite D
Portsmouth, NH 03801
Horsley Witten, Inc.
3179 Main Strcci
P.O. Box 7
Barnstable, MA 02630
I'm looking into others and will send them along.
TOTRL P.02
~-~~ ~-(.t:Jt:J rrcuy,
.
,u
C-~'~J.C'OJ.~J
r.~.1.
NEW YORK STATE DEPAR'IMENT OF STATE
DIVISION OF COASTAL RaOURCES AND WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION
162 WASHINGTON AVENUE
ALBANY, NEW YORK 12231
Phone: (518) 474-6000
FAX: (518) 473-2464
FAX MESSAGE
TO:
Ruth Oliva
FROM:
SteveRidler
DATE:
November 3, 1994
ME$SAGE:
Here are two m2mrtg lists for erosion and harbor management, as you can .
see there an: many consultants potentially c;ouJ.d do both.projecu (or at
least should be sufficiently iIltereStecl to receive both RFPs). Some of the
addresses are pretty old and some companies may not exist or have
changed their addresses - so do not be surprised if you get some returns.
I have not managed to get a response from the coastal programs in
Connecticut, Rhode Is1ancI and Massachusetts - hopefully they will get .
back to me tomorrow with some consultants they have used. If so I will
pass these on.
I will be 81T8IIging for the completion of the gnmt contracts tomorrow.
Numbe<" of sheels ~uding _ page): S
If lh.... is a queotiOD or prob!_ caD: Steve Rid1... II (S18) 47~
NOV-03-1994 17:01 FROM
.
TO
8-900~167651823
P.02
This is the mllilillllist for the Harbor MaDlgemeat RFP, those marked with an .. may be able to
do the Local EI:osion Management Program.
Olko Engineering ..
136 West 21 Street
New York, NY 10011
Geoffrey B. Steatlmal'l
345 North Main St
Westport, cr 06880
Saratoga AS$OCiates ..
443 Broadway
Saratoga, NY 12866
AlTN: Brian McMahon
Bagdon Environmental Associates ..
3 Normanskill Blvd
Delmar. NY 12054
A1TN: Mark Bagdon
Buckhurst, Fish, Hutton, Katz ..
72 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10011
Carr, Lynch Associates ..
1385 Cambrdge Street
Cambridge. MA 02139
Sasaki Asaociates, Inc. ..
64 Pleasant Street
Water1l)wn, MA 02172
Frederick P. Cart Associates, Ine
350 Theodore Friend Avenue
Rye, NY 10580
The LA Group, Ine,~. df.NAd
468 Broadway -V-'-
Saratoga Springs, NY 2866
Baystate Environmental Consultants, Ine ..
296 North Main Street
East Longmeadow, MA 01028
Clough Harbor AS$OCiates ..
ill Winners Cicle
PO Box 5269
A1abany, NY 12205.5269
Cashin Associates, PC ..
1200 Veterans Memorial Highway
Hauppauge, NY 11788
lohn D.M. Luttman -lohnson, P.E.
Consortium ..
Total Marine Concepts, Inc.
150 Front Street - Suite 203
Mill Wharf Plaza
Scituate, MA 02066
Arthur D. Little, In<; ..
A<:oI'II Park
Cambridge. MA 02140-2390
Fort Point Associates ..
300 Congress Street
Boston, MA 02210
Albertson, Sharp, Ew~ ~ Jl. ~r
17 North Avenue ~- .
Norwalk, cr 06851
DI Cesare - Bentley Engineers, Inc. ..
Century Professional Centec
100 Fort Hill Road
Groton, CT 06340
Gruber, Kirshen and AsSOC~'ates
PO Box 710 ~.#
Brewerton, NY 13029 ~
OPK
101 East Walee Street
PO Boll 29
Syracuse, NY 13201
CE Maguire, In<; ..
One Court Street
New Britain CT 06501
Fred Hart Associates ..
530 5th Avenue
New York, NY 10036
~
NOU-03-1994 17:01 FROM
.
Beyer, Blinder, Belle *
Architects and Planners
41 East 11th Street
New York, NY 1003
TAMS Consulting, Inc ·
The TAMS Building
655 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10017
Fay, Spofford and Thorndike Inc :,
6 St. James Avenue ~
Boston, MA 02116
Coastal Consultants ·
PO Box 1149
Madison Square Station
New York, NY 10159
CT Male Associates *
PO Box 727
50 Century Drive
Latham, NY 12110
Manuel S. Bmanuel Associates ·
50 Piermont Avenue
PO Box 832
Nyack, NY 10960
Environmental Design and RC$eafch, P.C. *
6007 Fair Lakes Drive, Suile 300
Syracuse, NY 13057
Inter-Science Research Associates. Inc. ·
PO Box 1201
36 Nugent Street
Southampton, NY 11969
Natchez & Associates
916 East Boston Post Road
Mamaroneck, NY 10543
Ocean and Coastal Consultants, Inc. ·
35 Corporate Drive
Trumbull, CT 06611
Peconic Associates, Inc.
One Bootleg Alley
PO Box 672
Greenport, NY 11944
TO
S-900741i5167651823
P.03
NOU-03-1994 17:01 FROM
.
TO
8-900~5167651823
P.04
This'is the 6st oC coosu1Cants Cor the Local Enlsioa Mlmagemeut Program, those IIIlII'ked with an
.. may be able to do the Harbor MaDgemeut Program:
Gary A. Rozmus ..
Senior Vice President
Eder Associates
480 Forest Avenue
LoCllSt Valley, NY 11560
Mr. Robert V. Wood
Vice President
Gibbs &. Hill, Inc.
11 Penn Plaza
New York, NY 10001
Mr. James W. Ford, P.E. ..
Partner
Stordl Associates
30 Jericho Eltecutive Plaza
Jericho, NY 11753
Mr. Roger C. Wilhelm, P.E. ..
Vice"President
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
1 Old Country Road, Suite 430
Carle Place, NY 11514
Mr. Donald A. Sioss. P.E. * .
Vice President
H2M Group
57S Broad Hollow Road
Melville, NY 11747
Mr. Norman H. Beumel ..
Coastal Planning &. Bngineering, Inc.
2481 NW Boca Ratan Blvd.
Boca Ratan, FL 33431
Mr. John C. Henningson, P.E. ..
Vice President
Malcolm Pimie
2 Corporate Park Drive, Box 7St
White Plains, NY 10602-{)751
Ms. Leslie Fields ..
Aubrey Consulting
Suite 2-3
350 Gifford Street
Falmouth, MA 02540
Mr. Ethan C. Eldon ..
President
Ethan C. Eldon Associates, Inc.
900 Ellison Avenue
Ewstbury, NY 11590
Mr. Erik J. Olsen ..
Olsen AsSociates
4438 Herschel Street
Jachsonville, FL 32210
Mr. John Robson ..
Vice President
Greemnan Pedersen, Inc.
32S West Main Street
Babylon, NY 11702
Ms. Karen Cbadwiclc ..
&ologistics Limited
490 Dutton Drive
Suite Al
Waterloo
Ontario
Canada N2L 6H7
Mr. Louis Saulino, P.E. ..
President
Maguire Group
3237 Route 112
Medford, NY 11763
Dr. Paul W. Grosser, Ph.D., P.E. ..
President
P. W. Grosser Consulting
P.O. Box 39
Sayville, NY 11782-8705
Mr. Gregory T; Greene
Director of Environmental Progra,ms .
o-~lliiB AIf.....;~tP.. P.C. r'~~'
~~~=~ve.fH've ~E?l~N-'~~
lI.\U , 'fi 118a~Alrlrrt'K
Ms. Jane Rubenstein ..
President
Rubenstein Environmental, Inc.
4 Welder Coun
Huntington Station, NY 11746
~-03-1994 17:02 FROM
.
Mr. Curtis F. Velsor, Jr., R.L.A. *
Associate
Camp, Dresser & McKee
100 Crossways Park North
Woodbury, NY 11797
Mr. Philip C. Sears *
Vice President
Allee, King, Rosen & Fleming Inc.
117 East 29th Street
New York, NY 10016
Dr. Rutherford Platt
Dept. of Geography
University of Massachusetts
Amherst, MA 01002
URS Consultants *
Mack Centre II
Mack Centre Drive
Paramus, NI 07652
Dr. Mark Byrnes
Coastal Studies Inst.
332 Howe-Russel Geosc:i Complelt
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Dr. Henry Bokuniewicz
Marine Sciences Research Center
SUNY at Stony Brook
Stony Brook, NY 11790
Mr. Aram TerclIunian
First Coastal Corp.
P.O. Box 1212
Westhampoon Beach, NY 11978
Mr. Timothy Kana *
Coastal Sciente & Bngineering Inc.
P.O. Box 8056
Columbia, SC 29202
Applied Technolgy & Management, Inc. *
P.O. Box 20336
Charleston, SC 29413
TO
8~5167651823
P.05
TOTRL P.05
.
.
II
,
,
i
STATE OF NEW YORK)
SS:
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
I JUDITH T. TERRY, Town Clerk of the Town of Southold, New York,
being duly sworn, says that on the 4th day of November 1994,
I'
II she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy,
in a proper. and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town
of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin
Board, Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971.
I
I
I
I
I
Ii
I
i
I
!
Legal Notice, Request for Proposals for
Erosion Management Plan for the Town
Tuesday, December 6, 1994.
consulting services to develop a Loca~
of Southold. RFP's due 11:00 A.M'1
I
I
,
I
i
I
I
tL/~~~
t/ Judith T, Terry
Southold Town Clerk
Sworn to before me this
4th day of November 1994.
~J~d" O. ~"4J
- Notary Pub ic
LlNDAJ. 800fIER
"Noa..~ St8te of N_Yerk
: . Suffolk Countyn 'f
Term Expi_ December 31. 19 '7
l!zry/:4t~t t1-
;&;IT
I~
. /~~'~:{ J/~J>' ~
,. //
Qu1
LEGAL NOTICE
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold is
Requesting Proposals for consulting services to develop a Local Erosion Management
Plan for the Town of Southold to focus on a townwide study of flooding and
erosion and a detailed examination of the shoreline reach extending from Duck Pond
Point to Horton Point in the Township of Southold, New York.
Proposal Specifications may be obtained from Judith Terry, Southold Town
Clerk, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, during regular
business hours. It is the responsibility of each proposer, before submitting a
Proposal, to examine the specifications and to reflect the information contained
therein in the Proposal.
Proposals shall be submitted in a narrative format, describing the work to be
performed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule showing
the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the performance
of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the firm and its
principals and a list of references showing the satisfactory performance of similar
jobs.
All Requests for Proposals must be signed and sealed in envelopes plainly
marked -Request for Proposal - Local Erosion Management Plan", and submitted
to the Office of the Town Clerk. RFP's will be received by the Town Clerk until
11 :00 A.M., Tuesday, December 6, 19911, at which time they will be opened and
read aloud in public. Proposals shall not be qua Ii fi.ed, modified, limited or
restricted in any way. I ncomplete proposals will not be considered.
A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17, 1994 at 1: 00 P. M. ,
at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971.
Dated: November 1, 1994.
JUDITH T. TERRY
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
*
*
*
.
.
Page 2 - Erosion Management Plan
PLEASE PUBLISH ON NOVEMBER 10, 19911, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT
OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, P.O. BOX
1179, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971.
Copies to the following:
The Suffolk Times
The Traveler-Watchman
Town Board Members
Town Attorney
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
~~"-L---
LEGAL NOTICE
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold is
Requesting Proposals for consulting services to develop a Local Erosion Management
Plan for the Town of Southold to focus on a townwide study of flooding and
erosion and a detailed examination of the shoreline reach extending from Duck Pond
Point to Horton Point in the Township of Southold, New York.
Proposal Specifications may be obtained from Judith Terry, Southold Town
Clerk, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, during regular
business hours. It is the responsibility of each proposer, before submitting a
Proposal, to examine the specifications and to reflect the information contained
therein in the Proposal.
Proposals shall be submitted in a narrative format, describing the work to be
performed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule showing
the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the performance
of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the firm and its
principals and a list of references showing the satisfactory performance of similar
jobs.
All Requests for Proposals must be signed and sealed in envelopes plainly
marked "Request for Proposal - Local Erosion Management Plan", and submitted
to the Office of the Town Clerk. RFP's will be received by the Town Clerk until
11 :00 A.M., Tuesday, December 6, 19911, at which time they will be opened and
read aloud in public. Proposals shall not be qualified, modified, limited or
restricted in any way. Incomplete proposals will not be considered.
A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17, 1994 at 1: 00 P. M. ,
at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971.
Dated: November 1, 1994.
JUDITH T. TERRY
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
*
*
*
.
.
Page 2 - Erosion Management Plan
PLEASE PUBLISH ON NOVEMBER 10, 19911, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT
OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, P.O. BOX
1179, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971.
Copies to the following:
The Suffolk Times
The Traveler-Watchman
Town Board Members
Town Attorney
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
.
.
LEGAL NOTICE
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold is
Requesting Proposals for consulting services to develop a Local Erosion Management
Plan for the Town of Southold to focus on a townwide study of flooding and
erosion and a detailed examination of the shoreline reach extending from Duck Pond
Point to Horton Point in the Township of Southold, New York.
Proposal Specifications may be obtained from Judith Terry, Southold Town
Clerk, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, during regular
business hours. It is the responsibility of each proposer, before submitting a
Proposal, to examine the specifications and to reflect the information contained
therein in the Proposal.
Proposals shall be submitted in a narrative format, describing the work to be
performed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule showing
the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the performance
of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the firm and its
principals and a list of references showing the satisfactory performance of similar
jobs.
All Requests for Proposals must be signed and sealed in envelopes plainly
marked "Request for Proposal - Local Erosion Management Plan", and submitted
to the Office of the Town Clerk. RFP's will be received by the Town Clerk until
11 :00 A.M., Tuesday, December 6, 19911, at which time they will be opened and
read aloud in public. Proposals shall not be qualified, modified, limited or
restricted in any way. Incomplete proposals will not be considered.
A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17, 19911 at 1: 00 P. M. ,
at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971.
Dated: November 1, 19911.
JUDITH T. TERRY
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
*
*
*
.
.
Page 2 - Erosion Management Plan
PLEASE PUBLISH ON NOVEMBER 10, 19911, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT
OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, P.O. BOX
1179, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971.
Copies to the following:
The Suffolk Times
The Traveler-Watchman
Town Board Members
Town Attorney
Town Clerk's Bulletin Board
.
.
PART I
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE
To develop a Local Erosion Management Plan for the Town of Southold to
focus on a townwide study of flooding and erosion and a detailed examination
of the shoreline reach extending from Duck Pond Point to Horton Point in the
Township of Southold, New York.
2.0 SCHEDULE
The schedule below is an estimate of the time period leading up to the
commencement of the Agreement. Its intent is to provide each Proposer with an
idea of when certain events may occur. The dates given are guidelines and
should not be construed as firm dates or deadlines due to the multiple parties
involved in the decision-making process.
EVENT
DATE
Advertising for proposals
Pre-submission conference
Proposal Opening
Town Board Approval
Agreement Executed
Operations Commencement
November 10, 199~
November 17, 199~ at 1 p.m.
December 6, 199~ at 11 a.m.
December 13, 199~
before December 23, 199~
December 26, 199~
3.0 EXAMINATION OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS AND FAMILIARITY WITH WORK
It is the responsibility of each Proposer before submitting a Proposal to
examine the specifications herein and notify the Town Clerk of all conflicts,
errors or discrepancies in the Proposal Specifications. Proposals shall be
expected to reflect the information contained in these specifications.
A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17, 199~ at 1 p.m.
at:
Town Hall
Conference Room
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York
11971
.
.
4.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT
Proposals shall be submitted in a narrative format, describing the work to
be performed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule
showing the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the
performance of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the firm
and its principals and a list of references showing the satisfactory
performance of similar jobs, as more specifically described in Part II, Section
5 of these specifications, entitled Proposal Requirements.
PROPOSALS SHALL NOT BE QUALIFIED, MODIFIED, LIMITED OR
RESTRICTED IN ANY WAY. Incomplete proposals will not be considered.
The proposals shall be submitted to the Office of the Town Clerk, Town of
Southold, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, 11971, prior to 11 a.m. on
December 6, 1994. Each proposer shall submit seven (7) separate complete sets
of his Proposal which shall be enclosed in a sealed opaque envelope plainly
marked on the outside with the title of the work and the name and address of
the Proposalder. No Proposal will be considered unless filed on or before the
time and at the place designated in the Notice to Proposers. Proposals received
after the time set for the opening will be returned to Proposers unopened. Any
Proposer may withdraw its Proposal upon receipt of a properly notarized written
request made no later than the time set for Proposal opening.
No alterations to these Proposal Specification will be considered valid
unless in writing and issued as Addenda. All questions must be received at
least ten (10) calendar days before proposal opening in order to be answered.
All addenda will be on file at the Town Clerk's office at least twenty-four
(24) hours before proposals are opened. The Town will not be bound by oral
clarifications.
Each Proposal must be accompanied by a Proposal guaranty in the sum of
ten percent of the proposal price. No proposal will be considered unless it is
accompanied by the required guaranty. The proposal bond shall name the Town
as the obligee. The proposal guaranty shall ensure the execution of the
agreement and the furnishing of the required bonds and insurance by the
successful Proposer, as specified in these specifications.
5.0 EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
The successful Proposer, or its legally authorized representative, shall
be required to appear in person within ten (10) days of the Notice of Award by
the Town at the place and time designated by the Town to execute the
Agreement.
6.0 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
The Town of Southold reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals if
such action is deemed to be in the best interests of the Town.
Proposals will be evaluated as specified in Part II, Section 5 of these
specifications entitled Proposal Requirements.
7.0 PAYMENTS
.
.
The town will pay the contractor upon final submission of the Town of the
Final Draft Local Erosion Management Plan in a form satisfactory to the Town
Board.
The Town shall be entitled to deduct from any payment owing to
Contractor any sums expended by the Town to cure any default or other
non-compliance by Contractor.
8.0 DEFAULT
In the event the Contractor fails to perform its obligations under the
Agreement, the Town may terminate such Agreement and the Town may procure
the services from other sources and hold the Contractor responsible for any
excess costs incurred and deduct from payments owing to the Contractor and/or
draw upon the Performance Bond as full or partial reimbursement of such
excess costs. The Town reserves the right to terminate the Agreement for just
cause.
.
.
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS
The Town of Southold will receive sealed proposals for preparation of a draft
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan. The proposals will be received until
the time and at the location herein specified which will then be opened and
publicly read aloud:
PLACE:
Office of the Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
(516) 765-1800
DATE:
Tuesday, December 6, 199~
TIME:
11:00 AM EDST
(LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE OPENED)
Proposals must include a narrative setting forth a work program for preparing
a Local Erosion Management Plan and delivering necessary data, as well as
information on experience and references.
Upon payment of non-refundable fifty dollars ($50.00) Proposal Solicitation may
be picked up at:
Office of the Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Judith T. Terry
Town Clerk
.
.
PART II
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LOCAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM November 1, 1994
WORK SPECIFICATIONS
1. Description
Background:
The Town of Southold is requesting proposals from qualified consultants for development of a final draft
Local Erosion Management Program for the Town of Southold. This program would identify coastal
flooding and erosion hazard areas, regulate land use and development in hazard areas, identify appropriate
beach management practices to mitigate the impacts of flooding and erosion on specific shoreline reaches,
educate and raise public awareness of coastal flooding and erosion and warn of the dangers of
development in coastal hazard areas, and establish post-storm recovery guidelines and standards for
regulatory coordination and decision making following storm events. The finished product will be used
to complete the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP).
Erosion management has become increasingly important in recent years due to the flooding and erosion
impacts from a number of severe coastal storms. As a result of these storms, the Town of Southold has
experienced significant erosion along sections of its Long Island Sound shoreline, leading to increased
need for erosion management planning.
The recommendations of the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force identified a need for local erosion
management planning. Specifically, the Task Force calls for local governments to develop comprehensive
erosion management programs as components of their L WRPs. Completion of the Local Erosion
Management Program should be consistent with all of the goals, principles, and recommendations of the
Task Force which are applicable in the Town. The New York State Department of State has recently
completed the Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program (LISCMP). The erosion policy
established in the LISCMP should serve as the starting point for development of an erosion management
plan in the Town. As part of the implementation of the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force and the
LISCMP, the Department of State is initiating a shoreline change analysis for the Long Island Sound
shoreline and a study of potential areas along the marine shoreline that would benefit from sand by-
passing. It is unlikely that these will be completed during this grant period.
The Town has been working on its L WRP for a number of years and is now concentrating on its
completion. The focus of the L WRP is on protecting the coastal environment and enhancing recreational
access to it. In order to fully address erosion issues, the Town of Southold and the Department of State
have identified the need to develop a comprehensive Local Erosion Management Program. The Local
Erosion Management Program will be used to complete the Town's LWRP and to provide guidance to
the local officials in the Town of Southold in their future planning and decision making.
Task:
Develop a final draft Local Erosion Management Program for the Town of Southold. This program will
focus on a townwide study of flooding and erosion and a detailed examination of the shoreline reach
extending from Duck Pond Point to Horton Point.
Objectives which must be completed for the Local Erosion Management Program include:
develop a town-wide flooding and erosion inventory and analysis which describes the geological
conditions of the coastal areas within the Town and the natural coastal processes affecting the
I
.
.
Town's shoreline
identify and describe specific shoreline conditions and trends relative to flooding and erosion by
shoreline reach
identify the coastal hazard areas within the Town and the natural resources and development
trends within these hazard areas
apply the LISCMP erosion policy and standards to the Town of Southold
evaluate the existing hazard management regulations at the federal, State and local levels and
present town wide and reach-specific hazard management recommendations within a
comprehensive plan that coordinates regulation.
develop hazard management goals, options and recommendations for general town-wide actions
to improve long term hazard management for the Town of Southold.
develop recommendations for post-storm redevelopment
address public education opportunities.
The Local Erosion Management Program will include a study of erosion issues between Duck Pond Point
and Horton Point, resulting in management proposals that mitigate erosion problems in this reach.
Organization:
The Local Erosion Management Program will be prepared by a consultant under the guidance of a
subcommittee of the Town's Waterfront Advisory Committee and coordinated by the Town's Director
of Community Development. Technical assistance will be available from the Department of State.
Project cost:
A maximum of $45,000 is available for this project.
2. Study Area
The study area is the entire marine shoreline of the Town of Southold. The study area has been split into
10 shoreline reaches, developed by the Town of Southold as part of their Draft Local Waterfront
Revitalization Program. There are 4 reaches along the Long Island Sound,S reaches along the bays, and
the shoreline of Fishers Island.
3. Perfonnance Standards
The final report shall contain the completed final draft Local Erosion Management Program for the Town
of Southold with all of the products listed in Section 4, Deliverables, as a minimum. The final report
should also include a discussion of the methodology used, reference all sources of information, and
identify any information gaps and issues requiring further study. This final report shall incorporate and
respond to the comments on the draft report provided by the Department of State and the Town of
Southold. The consultant will be required to attend several progress meetings and two public meetings
organized by the Town to highlight local concerns on erosion issues and to provide the opportunity for
public comment on the draft document.
The report should be prepared using WordPerfect 5.1. Map products and tabular data shall be prepared
using the guidelines in Attachment I.
2
.
.
4. Deliverables
A. A draft Local Erosion Management Program for the Town of Southold containing the following
elements:
TASK AI:
Provide a descriptive analysis of the coastal area and shoreline of the Town of
Southold that provides an understanding of the geological setting. coastal
processes, land use and flooding and erosion prone areas.
NOTE: The presentation of this task should be targeted at increasing the basic understanding of
coastal processes for Town officials, staff and local residents. Technical terminology should be
clearly explained to enable comprehension of the report.
Products:
A general description of the morphology of the coast. This will cover a description of the
geology, landforms, aquifers. wetlands and sediment within the coastal areas of the Town, the
location and geomorphology of coastal features such as beaches, dunes, bluffs, inlets, wetlands,
barrier landforms and rocky shorelines and the general conditions that led to their formation, how
these features function to abate flooding and erosion, factors affecting their stability and the
current natural resource values that they support.
A description and analysis of the natural coastal processes affecting the shoreline and the physical
forces driving these coastal processes, including wind and wave characteristics, storrns, tides,
currents, longshore sediment transport, and sea level rise.
A general change analysis of the coast addressing:
interaction of processes and natural features reflecting dynamics of the coast
storm events and their role in shaping the coast
engineering projects and their role in shaping the coast
A discussion of the existing land use patterns of the coastal area. A current land use map,
narrative and aerial photographs are available at the Town of Southold.
An identification of flooding and erosion prone areas. An overview of the existing regulatory
framework for erosion management
Map Products:
A map of the Town of Southold showing the study area and identifying the specific shoreline
reaches that comprise the inventory and analysis.
A map or series of maps depicting the shoreline and identifying the morphology of the coast,
land use and delineating the flooding and erosion prone areas within the Town.
TASK A2:
Analysis of hazard areas and development, including characterization of at-risk
development and identification of potential for additional development.
Products:
For each reach provide a detailed inventory and description of the current shoreline and adjacent
3
.
.
upland including:
coastal morphology
coastw processes
flooding and erosion prone areas, including a discussion of the type and intensity
of hazards occurring in each reach and an identification of regulatory authority
and the location of their boundaries
land use and development
upland structures
in-water/shoreline structures
infrastructure
dredging and dredge spoil disposw
observations regarding current practices associated with land use and
development as they interact with coastw morphology and processes - examples
of current practices include structurw engineering standards, regulatory
standards, site plan and development characteristics.
For each reach, provide an anwysis of the current shoreline that has resulted from the interaction
of the above inventoried items. Use historic maps depicting past shoreline, the historic shoreline
maps of Long Island Sound currently being prepared for the Department of State (if available)
and past and present aeriw photography to compare the current coastal process conditions to
historicw conditions. The anwysis should delineate where the current shoreline configuration is
a result of naturw processes. It should wso indicate where the shoreline configuration has been
wtered by human interaction and assess the effects of public and private man-made shore
protection structures, dredging and other uses on coastal processes and on the shoreline.
Within identified flooding and erosion prone areas provide a characterization of at-risk
development and identify the potentiw for additionw development. This should include a
discussion of development (type, siting, density, constraints and trends) in the flooding and
erosion prone areas and an identification of vacant parcels in these areas suitable for development.
Potentiw development of these vacant parcels should be presented, based on development trends
in these specific areas and within the context of development trends on adjacent lands within the
reach.
Provide an assessment of the suitability of current regulations and management practices in
flooding and erosion prone areas.
Map products:
A series of individuw reach maps at I :24,000 identifying as appropriate, coastw processes, the
location of the flooding and erosion prone areas identified in Task A I, the detailed location of
naturw features and development contained in these areas.
TASK A3:
Synthesis of reach anwysis into townwide flooding and erosion management
issues.
NOTE: The presentation of this task should be targeted at increasing the basic understanding of
coastal processes for Town officiws, staff and locw residents. Technicw terminology should be
clearly explained to enable comprehension of the report.
4
. .
Products:
Using information collected in the reach analysis outlined in Task A2, identify common flooding
and erosion issues and delineate sections of coast (management units) with common flooding and
erosion management objectives.
Using the LISCMP erosion policy (policy #5) as guidance, identify flooding and erosion
management objectives which should be applied to identified management units, consider positive
and negative impacts of each objective. Management objectives identified in Policy #5 include:
minimize loss of life and structures through the following steps in order of priority:
avoidance
vegetation
soft structures
hard structures
protect and restore natural protective features
maintenance of public lands
navigation infrastructure and management
public investment
building codes
NOTE: This task requires consultation with DOS to apply regional policy to develop flooding
and erosion management objectives for the Town.
TASK A4:
Specific application of the LISCMP erosion policy (policy #5) to the town,
including the geographic application of standards and the development of specific
structural or numeric standards.
Products:
Identification of specific policy standards from the LISCMP erosion policy (policy #5) to be
applied to the management units identified in Task A3.
Refined standards specific to the conditions in the Town of Southold reflecting flooding and
erosion management objectives for common management units, specific shoreline structures,
alongshore variations in coastal conditions, and applicable management measures.
Compare standards against local regulations. Identify where current regulations meets standards
and where changes are required. Suggest appropriate implementation.
NOTE: This task requires consultation with DOS to apply regional policy and develop policy
standards for the Town.
TASK AS:
Define post-storm recovery plans including recommendations for regulatory
coordination, decision making and public investment.
Products:
Define post-storm redevelopment and development goals for each management unit, consistent
with erosion management objectives.
Discuss various options for post-storm redevelopment and development and the impacts on future
5
.
.
hazard mitigation.
Develop post-storm redevelopment and development recommendations for each management unit
which will take advantage of the post-storm environment to accomplish defined management
objectives. Provide background to support these recommendations.
Define procedures for post-storm redevelopment including standards for qualification for
emergency permitting and recommendations for a procedure to establish coordinated between
Town, State and Federal agencies.
Define the areas where emergency public and private property protection is allowable and the
methods of protection allowed within each management unit.
TASK A6:
Opportunities and options for implementing flooding and erosion management.
Products:
Identify and describe capital projects to implement flooding and erosion management objectives.
Provide an indication of cost, funding sources and phasing.
Identify areas requiring consultation with the Department of Environmental Conservation to
obtain multi-year permits for long-term management actions.
Provide options on additional resources required to achieve the management goals such as studies,
maps, monitoring, coordination with other agencies, taxing districts, and cost share arrangements.
TASK A7:
Identify opportunities to use the results of this study to raise public awareness of
flooding and erosion issues.
Products:
Provide recommendations on how the findings of this study can raise public awareness in support
of flooding and erosion management objectives in the Town of Southold. Focus on where to
avoid development, what structural standards apply and how to accomplish flooding and erosion
management objectives.
B. A detailed erosion management plan for shoreline reach #2 extending from Duck Pond Point to
Horton Point.
Following the general analysis of this reach completed in the Tasks A I -A 7, the consultant should
undertake a detailed investigation of reach #2 using available information, including but not
limited to maps, air photos, site inspections, engineering models, and other available sources.
In a separate section of the final draft Local Erosion Management Program, a plan should be
presented which includes the following information for reach #2:
TASK Bl:
Examine the available historical maps and air photo information for this reach
and identify areas of erosion, accretion and stability prior to 1964, from 1964 to
1974, from 1974 to 1984, and from 1984 to the present with particular emphasis
on the impact of shore protection structures.
6
.
.
Products:
Determine the approximate rates of erosion and accretion over time. Describe the methodology
used to determine the approximate rates of erosion and accretion and assess the accuracy of the
calculated rates. This should include a table providing the distance each of these unstable
shoreline areas has moved landward or seaward over the specified periods of time and the rate
of erosion or rate of accretion for that particular area.
Discuss the relative contribution of incident coastal processes to the measured shoreline erosion.
Include also the contribution of factors affecting bluff stability in appropriate locations.
Map products:
Map showing the areas of erosion and areas of accretion based on an examination of historical
maps and air photos, and keyed to the table above.
TASK B2:
Review the shoreline development within this reach.
Products:
Expanding on the analysis conducted in Task A2, provide a comprehensive presentation of the
land use adjacent to the shoreline in this reach, noting developed shoreline parcels which would
be seriously impacted by continued shoreline flooding and erosion.
Discuss public and private land use practices in the reach which directly influence land stability
relative to shoreline erosion.
A table should be prepared identifying each of the shore protection structures within the reach
and providing a general description including the location, age, size, type of construction,
ownership of the structure, land ownership, permit history, and general condition of each
structure.
TASK B3:
Identify the direction of littoral drift, the net volumes of sediment transported in
the longshore direction, seasonal and annual variations in the longshore sediment
transport where possible, and the sediment sources and sinks.
Products:
Within the reach as a whole, and within the sub-reaches identified below, discuss the direction
of littoral drift and any variations that occur, the sediment sources and the sediment sinks that
may exist. Based on the physical shoreline changes identified in Tasks B I and B2 and
calculations based on historical maps and air photos, a table should be included showing the
estimated net annual longshore transport volumes within the reach and sub-reaches over the time
intervals identified in Task B 1.
Sub-reaches for the purpose of this analysis include:
I. Duck Pond Point to Goldsmith Inlet
2. Goldsmith Inlet to Bittner Groin
3. Bittner Groin to westernmost Lockman Groin
4. Lockman Groin field
5. Kenny's Beach (easternmost Lockman groin to Kenny Rd)
6. Horton Beach (Kenny Rd to Horton Pt)
7
.
.
TASK B4
Using a sediment budget approach, determine the impact of each shore
perpendicular structure within this reach on the littoral transport volumes and the
rate of shoreline erosion/accretion.
Products:
Prepare a simple sediment budget that would examine the sediment sources and sinks and identify
the quantities of sediment into and out of the entire reach and each of the sub-reaches identified
in Task B3, over each of the time intervals identified in Task Bl.
Compare sediment transport between each time interval for each sub-reach and the reach as a
whole, to determine if measurable impacts are occurring as a result of existing shore protection
structures. Where possible, impacts should be quantified.
Compare measurable impacts due to disruption of longshore transport with erosion identified in
Task B I. Discuss whether restoring the natural sediment transport would significantly reduce the
erosion that is presently occurring in these areas.
TASK B5:
Assess the condition of the shoreline in the reach with a focus on the beaches
adjacent to each of the shore perpendicular and shore parallel structures within
the reach.
Products:
Using the information developed in Tasks BI-B4, assess the condition of the shoreline in the
reach in general and in the sub-reaches. Where feasible, note the impact of each shore
perpendicular and shore parallel structure within the reach.
Discuss the effects structures in the reach over time and the extent of these effects along the
shoreline.
Discuss the potential future shoreline condition assuming current management practices continue.
TASK B6
Identify the range of methods available for addressing shoreline erosion
problems.
Products:
Using the general reach analysis completed in Tasks A3-A6 and the specific reach information
developed in Tasks BI-B5, discuss the various options and combinations of options available to
the Town for addressing erosion, including non-structural, soft-structural, and hard structural
methods, and the positive and negative impacts of each option. Identify appropriate timing for
implementation of options.
Discuss the effectiveness as an erosion control method, of modifying the existing shore protection
structures to restore the natural sediment transport. This discussion should be based on an
analysis of potential impacts which would occur in the reach derived from simple model studies
and available case histories.
Non-structural approaches should identify opportunities available to the Town for relocation,
acquisition, regulatory changes, zoning changes, fiscal expenditure changes, and various
8
.
.
incentives and disincentives to influence development practices and existing land use. Discussion
of appropriate post-storm approaches should be included.
TASK B7:
Recommend the most suitable method(s) for short and long term management of
this section of shoreline.
Products:
Recommend the best method(s) of managing this section of shoreline and the individual parcels,
based on a consideration of the existing conditions and future trends as presented in the general
reach analysis and clarified by this specific analysis.
If modification of existing shore protection is recommended, explain in detail the type of
alteration to be made, estimate the cost to modify the structure, and discuss the positive and
negative impacts updrift and downdrift of the remaining structure due to typical coastal conditions
and severe storm events.
If non-structural alternatives are recommended, explain in detail the procedures which should be
followed by the Town for implementation. Estimate the cost(s) for this recommendation.
Discuss the positive and negative impacts which would result from this method.
If structural alternatives are recommended, explain in detail the type of construction required,
estimate the cost of construction and maintenance, and outline the procedure which the Town
should follow for implementation. Discuss the positive and negative impacts which could result
from this structural recommendation.
C. Five copies of the final draft Local Erosion Management Plan including comments on the draft
report provided by the Department of State and the Town of Southold, and a 3.5" floppy disk
containing the report in WordPerfect 5.1 format.
5. Proposal Requirements
Each proposal received will be carefully evaluated for its technical merit. The following items must be
addressed in the proposal. Those proposals which most satisfactorily address the following items will
be considered in the final selection:
A. A work program for performing the Flooding and Erosion Inventory and Analysis based on the
performance standards set forth in Section 3, Performance Standards, and provisions for
delivering all data products listed in Section 4, Deliverables as a minimum. Work program
should show the Contractor's ability to provide the necessary products and meet the deadlines for
delivery described in Section 4, Deliverables. Work program should also discuss the
methodology and specify sources of information for performing the Local Erosion Management
Program.
B. Your firm's ability to perform the required services. Names, titles, qualifications, and relative
contribution of all the individuals who will be providing their services should be given for
evaluation. Indicate how their combined qualifications/ assignments enable them to competently
9
.
.
complete the work. Your firm's direct experience in the inventory and analysis of geological
conditions, coastal processes and hazard management planning in the coastal environment should
be presented.
c. Your firm's fee for performing the required services. The funding available for completing this
flooding and erosion inventory and analysis and plan development is limited to $45,000. For bids
up to this amount, full payment will be made for all services provided. Bids exceeding $45,000
will not be accepted. A list of all the data products in Section 4, Deliverables that could be
provided for a charge of $45,000 will be acceptable in the event that available funds are
insufficient to complete Section 4 in its entirety.
6. Schedule of Work
The following schedule of major milestones and accompanying completion dates shall be maintained in
developing the final draft Local Erosion Management Program for the Town of Southold.
MAJOR MILESTONE: DUE DATE:
Issue Request For Proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11/94
Pre-proposal meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11/94
Proposal Due Date ........................................... 11/94
Proposal Review and Selection ................................... 11/94
Contract Award Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11/94
Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Work Program
and Meeting .......................................... 12/94
Public Meeting # I ........................................... 12/94
Progress meeting w/Town & DOS ................................. 01/95
Progress meeting w/Town & DOS ................................. 02/95
Draft Local Erosion Management Program ............................ 03/95
Public Meeting # 2 ............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03/95
Comments from DOS and Town on
Consultant Draft Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03/95
Final Draft Local Erosion Management Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03/31/95
IO
.
.
ATTACHMENT 1: REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACT MAP PRODUCTS
GENERAL MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
The following general cartographic requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor:
1) Map Products -- The Division's preference is for the delivery of digital map products that meet the
specifications outlined in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section. If analog map products are
produced, they must meet specifications outlined in the Digital-Ready Map Product Requirements section.
The ability to provide digital map products will be one of the factors used in selecting a Contractor.
2) Deliverable Format -- All digital map and attribute table files must be provided in MapInfo 3.0 for
Windows format on 4 mm DAT tape or 3.5" floppy diskette media. Alternatively, the digital products
may be provided in UNIX or PC ARC/INFO binary format or AutoCAD DXF format on the same media
types upon approval of the Division. All other digital formats require prior approval of the Division.
All non-digital map products must be provided on stable base material at a scale agreed upon by the
Division. The map products must include an index map to all map sheets and thorough descriptions of
all the cartographic elements portrayed on the maps.
3) Documentation -- A data dictionary must be included along with the map files describing file contents,
file names, map projection, coordinate system, RMS accuracy, information sources, and creation
methodology .
4) Map Accuracy -- Unless otherwise stated by the Division, all deliverable map products must conform
to National Map Accuracy Standards for horizontal accuracy as established by the United States
Geological Survey (USGS). For example, maps at 1:20,000 or smaller, not more than 10% of the well-
defined map points tested must be more than 1/50 inch (5 mm) out of correct position. At I :24,000, this
tolerance translates to a required horizontal accuracy of 40 feet.
DIGITAL CARTOGRAPIDC FILE REQUIREMENTS
The following cartographic construction requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor:
1) Edge-matching -- All map sheets must be both visually and coordinate edge-matched with adjacent
map sheets. No edge-match tolerance will be allowed. Attributes for splitable features must also be
identical.
2) Common Boundaries -- All features that share a common boundary, regardless of map layer, must
have exactly the same coordinate position of that feature in all common layers.
3) Point Duplication -- No duplication of points that occur within a data string is permitted.
4) Connectivity -- Where graphic elements visually meet, they must be also digitally meet. All
confluences of line and polygon data must be exact; "overshoots", "undershoots", "slivers", or
"offshoots" are NOT permitted.
II
.
.
5) Line Quality -- A high quality cartographic appearance must be achieved. Transitions from straight
lines to curvilinear elements must be smooth, with angular inflections at the point of intersection. The
digital representation must not contain extraneous data at a non visible level. There should be no jags,
hooks, or zero length segments. Any lines that are straight, or should be straight, should be digitized
using only two points that represent the beginning and ending points of the line.
6) Polygon Closure -- For area features being digitized, the last coordinate pair must be exactly
(mathematically) equal to the first coordinate pair. No line or polygon must cross itself except to join
at an actual confluence. All digitized features across map boundaries must be edited to effect smooth and
continuous lines.
7) Graphic Precision -- All digital graphic elements must contain positional coordinates significant to
one thousandth (.001) of a foot.
8) Digitizer Accuracy -- The required RMS error for digitizer accuracy must be .003 or better for digital
map registration.
DIGITAL-READY MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
The following requirements for non-digital map products must be followed to facilitate the future
conversion of the maps to digital map products.
1) Base Map Media -- All maps must be created on mylar or other stable base material.
2) Map Scale -- All maps of a similar series should be created using the same base scale. Unless
otherwise stated by the Division, all maps should be compiled at 1 :24,000. If other map scales are
approved by the Division, they will conform to standard map scales such as 1 :9600; 1 :50,000; 1 :75,000;
or 1:100,000.
3) Map Registration -- The maps must provide a minimum of four (4) corner and four (4) interior ticks
tied to USGS/NYSDOT quadrangle Lat/Long or NYTM coordinates. The maps must be geometrically
correct and should register when overlaid on the appropriate USGS/NYSDOT quadrangle control ticks.
4) Map Projection and Datum -- The maps must include the map projection and the map datum used.
5) Map Title and Legend -- The maps must provide a title and legend block describing the information
contained on the maps.
6) Cartographic Quality -- The quality of all map line work and symbolization must conform to items
1 - 6 in the map criteria set forth in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section outlined above;
12
, .
.
.
CONTRACT DATABASE STANDARDS
Delivery Media
All database and tabular files must be delivered on 4 mm Digital Audio Tape (DAT) or 3.5" diskette.
Delivery in another media format must have prior approval of the Division.
Software Format
All database and tabular files must be provided in Borland's Paradox for Windows version 4.5 format.
Other formats that are convertible to Paradox may be used with prior approval of the Division.
Geographic Attributes
Database and tabular files that contain elements with a geographic reference must provide a corresponding
data field and a geographic coordinate pair for each feature location.
I3
.
.
JUDITH T. TERRY
TOWN CLERK
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southo1d, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823
Telephone (516) 765-1801
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 1. 19911:
,.
RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes
and directs the Town Clerk to advertise for Requests for Proposals to
obtain the services of consultants for assist the Town in the preparation of
a Harbor Management Study. and a Coastal Erosion Shoreline Study; said
RFP's to be subject to the approval of the Town Attorney.
d./d~
~di~hT: 'Terry - ~
Southold Town Clerk
November 2. 19911
/"
/
.LbolQ..::a r~u",
~
~,
,
iPe:V@
jP;: {5/
s:
Bach proposal received will be carefully evaluated for its techDical merit. The following items must be
addressed in the proposal. Those proposals which most satisfactorily address the following items will
be considered in the final selection:
A work program for performing the Harbor Management Plan based on the performance
standards set forth in Section 3, Performance Standards, and provisions for deliverin: all data
products listed in Section 4, Deliverables as a minimum. Work proif3ll1 should show th~
ContractOr's ability to provide the lleC""ury products and meet the deadlines for delivery
described in Section 4, Deliverables. Work program should also diSCl1Ss the methodology and
specifY sources of information for performing the Harbor Management Plan.
,
A.
B. Your firm's ability to perform the required services. Names, titles, qualifications, and relative
contribution of all the individuals who will be providing their services should be given for
evaluation. Indicate how their combined qualifications/assignments enable them to competently
complete the work. Your firm's direct experience with harbor management planning should be
presented.
6. Schedule of Work
The following schedule of major milestones and accompanying completion dates shall be maintained in
developing the Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold.
",'-',":
MAJOR Mll-ESTONE:
Issue Request For Proposal
Proposal Due Date
Proposal Review and Selection
Contract Award Date
Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Work Program
Public Meeting # I
Draft Inventory and Analysis
Public Meeting # 2
Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Draft Report
Final Draft Harbor Management Plan
6
DUE DATE:
11194
12/94
12/94
12/94
12/94
12/94
03195
03195
03/95
03/31/95
LEGAL NOTICE
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold is
Requesting Proposals for consulting services to develop a Local Erosion Management
Plan for the Town of Southold to focus on a townwide study of flooding and
erosion and a detailed examination of the shoreline reach extending from Duck Pond
Point to Horton Point in the Township of Southold, New York.
Proposal Specifications may be obtained from Judith Terry, Southold Town
Clerk, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, during regular
business hours. It is the responsibility of each proposer, before submitting a
Proposal, to examine the specifications and to reflect the information contained
therein in the Proposal.
Proposals shall be submitted in a narrative format, describing the work to be
performed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule showing
the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the performance
of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the firm and its
principals and a list of references showing the satisfactory performance of similar
jobs.
All Requests for Proposals must be signed and sealed in envelopes plainly
marked "Request for Proposal - Local Erosion Management Plan", and submitted
to the Office of the Town Clerk. RFP's will be received by the Town Clerk until
11 :00 A.M., Tuesday, December 6, 1994, at which time they will be opened and
read aloud in public. Proposals shall not be qualified, modified, limited or
restricted in any way. I ncomplete proposals will not be considered.
A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17,1994 at 1:00 P.M.,
at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971.
Dated: November 1, 1994.
JUDITH T. TERRY
SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK
*
*
*
PART I
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE
To develop a Local Erosion Management Plan for the Town of Southold to
focus on a townwide study of flooding and erosion and a detailed examination
of the shoreline reach extending from Duck Pond Point to Horton Point in the
Township of Southold, New York.
2.0 SCHEDULE
The schedule below is an estimate of the time period leading up to the
commencement of the Agreement. Its intent is to provide each Proposer with an
idea of when certain events may occur. The dates given are guidelines and
should not be construed as firm dates or deadlines due to the multiple parties
involved in the decision-making process.
EVENT
DATE
Advertising for proposals
Pre-submission conference
Proposal Opening
Town Board Approval
Agreement Executed
Operations Commencement
November 10, 19911-
November 17, 19911- at 1 p.m.
December 6, 19911- at 11 a.m.
December 13, 19911-
before December 23, 19911-
December 26, 19911-
3.0 EXAMINATION OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS AND FAMILIARITY WITH WORK
It is the responsibility of each Proposer before submitting a Proposal to
examine the specifications herein and notify the Town Clerk of all conflicts,
errors or discrepancies in the Proposal Specifications. Proposals shall be
expected to reflect the information contained in these specifications.
at:
A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17, 19911- at 1 p.m.
Town Hall
Conference Room
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York
11971
~.O PROPOSAL FORMAT
Proposals shall be submitted in a narrative format, describing the work to
be performed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule
showing the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the
performance of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the firm
and its principals and a list of references showing the satisfactory
performance of similar jobs, as more specifically described in Part II, Section
5 of these specifications, entitled Proposal Requirements.
PROPOSALS SHALL NOT BE QUALIFIED, MODIFIED, LIMITED OR
RESTRICTED IN ANY WAY. Incomplete proposals will not be considered.
The proposals shall be submitted to the Office of the Town Clerk, Town of
Southold, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, 11971, prior to 11 a.m. on
December 6, 199~. Each proposer shall submit seven (7) separate complete sets
of his Proposal which shall be enclosed in a sealed opaque envelope plainly
marked on the outside with the title of the work and the name and address of
the Proposalder. No Proposal will be considered unless filed on or before the
time and at the place designated in the Notice to Proposers. Proposals received
after the time set for the opening will be returned to Proposers unopened. Any
Proposer may withdraw its Proposal upon receipt of a properly notarized written
request made no later than the time set for Proposal opening.
No alterations to these Proposal Specification will be considered valid
unless in writing and issued as Addenda. All questions must be received at
least ten (10) calendar days before proposal opening in order to be answered.
All addenda will be on file at the Town Clerk's office at least twenty-four
(2~) hours before proposals are opened. The Town will not be bound by oral
clarifications.
Each Proposal must be accompanied by a Proposal guaranty in the sum of
ten percent of the proposal price. No proposal will be considered unless it is
accompanied by the required guaranty. The proposal bond shall name the Town
as the obligee. The proposal guaranty shall ensure the execution of the
agreement and the furnishing of the required bonds and insurance by the
successful Proposer, as specified in these specifications.
5.0 EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
The successful Proposer, or its legally authorized representative, shall
be required to appear in person within ten (10) days of the Notice of Award by
the Town at the place and time designated by the Town to execute the
Agreement.
6.0 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS
The Town of Southold reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals if
such action is deemed to be in the best interests of the Town.
Proposals will be evaluated as specified in Part II, Section 5 of these
specifications entitled Proposal Requirements.
7.0 PAYMENTS
The town will pay the contractor upon final submission of the Town of the
Final Draft Local Erosion Management Plan in a form satisfactory to the Town
Board.
The Town shall be entitled to deduct from any payment owing to
Contractor any sums expended by the Town to cure any default or other
non-compliance by Contractor.
8.0 DEFAULT
In the event the Contractor fails to perform its obligations under the
Agreement, the Town may terminate such Agreement and the Town may procure
the services from other sources and hold the Contractor responsible for any
excess costs incurred and deduct from payments owing to the Contractor and/or
draw upon the Performance Bond as full or partial reimbursement of such
excess costs. The Town reserves the right to terminate the Agreement for just
cause.
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS
The Town of Southold will receive sealed proposals for preparation of a draft
Southold Local Erosion Management Plan. The proposals will be received until
the time and at the location herein specified which will then be opened and
publicly read aloud:
PLACE:
Office of the Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
(516) 765-1800
DATE:
TIME:
Tuesday, December 6, 199~
11:00 AM EDST
(LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE OPENED)
Proposals must include a narrative setting forth a work program for preparing
a Local Erosion Management Plan and delivering necessary data, as well as
information on experience and references.
Upon payment of non-refundable fifty dollars ($50.00) Proposal Solicitation may
be picked up at:
Office of the Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Judith T. Terry
Town Clerk
PART II
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LOCAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM November 1, 1994
WORK SPECIFICATIONS
1. Description
Background:
The Town of Southold is requesting proposals from qualified consultants for development of a final draft
Local Erosion Management Program for the Town of Southold. This program would identify coastal
flooding and erosion hazard areas, regulate land use and development in hazard areas, identify appropriate
beach management practices to mitigate the impacts of flooding and erosion on specific shoreline reaches,
educate and raise public awareness of coastal flooding and erosion and warn of the dangers of
development in coastal hazard areas, and establish post-storm recovery guidelines and standards for
regulatory coordination and decision making following storm events. The finished product will be used
to complete the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP).
Erosion management has become increasingly important in recent years due to the flooding and erosion
impacts from a number of severe coastal storms. As a result of these storms, the Town of Southold has
experienced significant erosion along sections of its Long Island Sound shoreline, leading to increased
need for erosion management planning.
The recommendations of the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force identified a need for local erosion
management planning. Specifically, the Task Force calls for local governments to develop comprehensive
erosion management programs as components of their LWRPs. Completion of the Local Erosion
Management Program should be consistent with all of the goals, principles, and recommendations of the
Task Force which are applicable in the Town. The New York State Department of State has recently
completed the Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program (LISCMP). The erosion policy
established in the LISCMP should serve as the starting point for development of an erosion management
plan in the Town. As part of the implementation of the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force and the
LISCMP, the Department of State is initiating a shoreline change analysis for the Long Island Sound
shoreline and a study of potential areas along the marine shoreline that would benefit from sand by-
passing. It is unlikely that these will be completed during this grant period.
The Town has been working on its L WRP for a number of years and is now concentrating on its
completion. The focus of the L WRP is on protecting the coastal environment and enhancing recreational
access to it. In order to fully address erosion issues, the Town of Southold and the Department of State
have identified the need to develop a comprehensive Local Erosion Management Program. The Local
Erosion Management Program will be used to complete the Town's LWRP and to provide guidance to
the local officials in the Town of Southold in their future planning and decision making.
Task:
Develop a final draft Local Erosion Management Program for the Town of Southold. This program will
focus on a townwide study of flooding and erosion and a detailed examination of the shoreline reach
extending from Duck Pond Point to Horton Point.
Objectives which must be completed for the Local Erosion Management Program include:
develop a town-wide flooding and erosion inventory and analysis which describes the geological
conditions of the coastal areas within the Town and the natural coastal processes affecting the
Town's shoreline
identify and describe specific shoreline conditions and trends relative to flooding and erosion by
shorel ine reach
identify the coastal hazard areas within the Town and the natural resources and development
trends within these hazard areas
apply the LISCMP erosion policy and standards to the Town of Southold
evaluate the existing hazard management regulations at the federal, State and local levels and
present town wide and reach-specific hazard management recommendations within a
comprehensive plan that coordinates regulation.
develop hazard management goals, options and recommendations for general town-wide actions
to improve long term hazard management for the Town of Southold.
develop recommendations for post-storm redevelopment
address public education opportunities.
The Local Erosion Management Program will include a study of erosion issues between Duck Pond Point
and Horton Point, resulting in management proposals that mitigate erosion problems in this reach.
Organization:
The Local Erosion Management Program will be prepared by a consultant under the guidance of a
subcommittee of the Town's Waterfront Advisory Committee and coordinated by the Town's Director
of Community Development. Technical assistance will be available from the Department of State.
Project cost:
A maximum of $45,000 is available for this project.
2. Stndy Area
The study area is the entire marine shoreline of the Town of Southold. The study area has been split into
10 shoreline reaches, developed by the Town of Southold as part of their Draft Local Waterfront
Revitalization Program. There are 4 reaches along the Long Island Sound, 5 reaches along the bays, and
the shoreline of Fishers Island.
3. Performance Standards
The final report shall contain the completed final draft Local Erosion Management Program for the Town
of Southold with all of the products listed in Section 4, Deliverables, as a minimum. The final report
should also include a discussion of the methodology used, reference all sources of information, and
identify any information gaps and issues requiring further study. This final report shall incorporate and
respond to the comments on the draft report provided by the Department of State and the Town of
Southold. The consultant will be required to attend several progress meetings and two public meetings
organized by the Town to highlight local concerns on erosion issues and to provide the opportunity for
public comment on the draft document.
The report should be prepared using WordPerfect 5.1. Map products and tabular data shall be prepared
using the guidelines in Attachment I.
2
4. Deliverables
A. A draft Local Erosion Management Program for the Town of Southold containing the following
elements:
TASK AI:
Provide a descriptive analysis of the coastal area and shoreline of the Town of
Southold that provides an understanding of the geological setting, coastal
processes, land use and flooding and erosion prone areas.
NOTE: The presentation of this task should be targeted at increasing the basic understanding of
coastal processes for Town officials, staff and local residents. Technical terminology should be
clearly explained to enable comprehension of the report.
Products:
A general description of the morphology of the coast. This will cover a description of the
geology, landforms, aquifers, wetlands and sediment within the coastal areas of the Town, the
location and geomorphology of coastal features such as beaches, dunes, bluffs, inlets, wetlands,
barrier landforms and rocky shorelines and the general conditions that led to their formation, how
these features function to abate flooding and erosion, factors affecting their stability and the
current natural resource values that they support.
A description and analysis of the natural coastal processes affecting the shoreline and the physical
forces driving these coastal processes, including wind and wave characteristics, storms, tides,
currents, longshore sediment transport, and sea level rise.
A general change analysis of the coast addressing:
interaction of processes and natural features reflecting dynamics of the coast
storm events and their role in shaping the coast
engineering projects and their role in shaping the coast
A discussion of the existing land use patterns of the coastal area. A current land use map,
narrative and aerial photographs are available at the Town of Southold.
An identification of flooding and erosion prone areas. An overview of the existing regulatory
framework for erosion management
Map Products:
A map of the Town of Southold showing the study area and identifying the specific shoreline
reaches that comprise the inventory and analysis.
A map or series of maps depicting the shoreline and identifying the morphology of the coast,
land use and delineating the flooding and erosion prone areas within the Town.
TASK A2:
Analysis of hazard areas and development, including characterization of at-risk
development and identification of potential for additional development.
Products:
For each reach provide a detailed inventory and description of the current shorel ine and adjacent
3
upland including:
coastal morphology
coastal processes
flooding and erosion prone areas, including a discussion of the type and intensity
of hazards occurring in each reach and an identification of regulatory authority
and the location of their boundaries
land use and development
upland structures
in-water/shoreline structures
infrastructure
dredging and dredge spoil disposal
observations regarding current practices associated with land use and
development as they interact with coastal morphology and processes - examples
of current practices include structural engineering standards, regulatory
standards, site plan and development characteristics.
For each reach, provide an analysis of the current shoreline that has resulted from the interaction
of the above inventoried items. Use historic maps depicting past shoreline, the historic shoreline
maps of Long Island Sound currently being prepared for the Department of State (if available)
and past and present aerial photography to compare the current coastal process conditions to
historical conditions. The analysis should delineate where the current shoreline configuration is
a result of natural processes. It should also indicate where the shoreline configuration has been
altered by human interaction and assess the effects of public and private man-made shore
protection structures, dredging and other uses on coastal processes and on the shoreline.
Within identified flooding and erosion prone areas provide a characterization of at-risk
development and identify the potential for additional development. This should include a
discussion of development (type, siting, density, constraints and trends) in the flooding and
erosion prone areas and an identification of vacant parcels in these areas suitable for development.
Potential development of these vacant parcels should be presented, based on development trends
in these specific areas and within the context of development trends on adjacent lands within the
reach.
Provide an assessment of the suitability of current regulations and management practices in
flooding and erosion prone areas.
Map products:
A series of individual reach maps at I :24,000 identifying as appropriate, coastal processes, the
location of the flooding and erosion prone areas identified in Task A I, the detailed location of
natural features and development contained in these areas.
TASK A3:
Synthesis of reach analysis into townwide flooding and erosion management
issues.
NOTE: The presentation of this task should be targeted at increasing the basic understanding of
coastal processes for Town officials, staff and local residents. Technical terminology should be
clearly explained to enable comprehension of the report.
4
Products:
Using information collected in the reach analysis outlined in Task A2, identify common flooding
and erosion issues and delineate sections of coast (management units) with common flooding and
erosion management objectives.
Using the LISCMP erosion policy (policy #5) as guidance, identify flooding and erosion
management objectives which should be applied to identified management units, consider positive
and negative impacts of each objective. Management objectives identified in Policy #5 include:
minimize loss of life and structures through the following steps in order of priority:
avoidance
vegetation
soft structures
hard structures
protect and restore natural protective features
maintenance of public lands
navigation infrastructure and management
public investment
building codes
NOTE: This task requires consultation with DOS to apply regional policy to develop flooding
and erosion management objectives for the Town.
TASK A4:
Specific application of the LISCMP erosion policy (policy #5) to the town,
including the geographic application of standards and the development of specific
structural or numeric standards.
Products:
Identification of specific policy standards from the LISCMP erosion policy (policy #5) to be
applied to the management units identified in Task A3.
Refined standards specific to the conditions in the Town of Southold reflecting flooding and
erosion management objectives for common management units, specific shoreline structures,
alongshore variations in coastal conditions, and applicable management measures.
Compare standards against local regulations. Identify where current regulations meets standards
and where changes are required. Suggest appropriate implementation.
NOTE: This task requires consultation with DOS to apply regional policy and develop policy
standards for the Town.
TASK AS:
Define post-storm recovery plans including recommendations for regulatory
coordination, decision making and public investment.
Products:
Define post-storm redevelopment and development goals for each management unit, consistent
with erosion management objectives.
Discuss various options for post-storm redevelopment and development and the impacts on future
5
hazard mitigation.
Develop post-storm redevelopment and development recommendations for each management unit
which will take advantage of the post-storm environment to accomplish defined management
objectives. Provide background to support these recommendations.
Define procedures for post-storm redevelopment including standards for qualification for
emergency permitting and recommendations for a procedure to establish coordinated between
Town, State and Federal agencies.
Define the areas where emergency public and private property protection is allowable and the
methods of protection allowed within each management unit.
TASK A6:
Opportunities and options for implementing flooding and erosion management.
Products:
Identify and describe capital projects to implement flooding and erosion management objectives.
Provide an indication of cost, funding sources and phasing.
Identify areas requiring consultation with the Department of Environmental Conservation to
obtain multi-year permits for long-term management actions.
Provide options on additional resources required to achieve the management goals such as studies,
maps, monitoring, coordination with other agencies, taxing districts, and cost share arrangements.
TASK A7:
Identify opportunities to use the results of this study to raise public awareness of
flooding and erosion issues.
Products:
Provide recommendations on how the findings of this study can raise public awareness in support
of flooding and erosion management objectives in the Town of Southold. Focus on where to
avoid development, what structural standards apply and how to accomplish flooding and erosion
management objectives.
B. A detailed erosion ItUJ1Ulgement plan for shoreline reach #2 extending from Duck Pond Point to
Honon Point.
Following the general analysis of this reach completed in the Tasks A I -A 7, the consultant should
undertake a detailed investigation of reach #2 using available information, including but not
limited to maps, air photos, site inspections, engineering models, and other available sources.
In a separate section of the final draft Local Erosion Management Program, a plan should be
presented which includes the following information for reach #2:
TASK Bl:
Examine the available historical maps and air photo information for this reach
and identify areas of erosion, accretion and stability prior to 1964, from 1964 to
1974, from 1974 to 1984, and from 1984 to the present with particular emphasis
on the impact of shore protection structures.
6
Products:
Determine the approximate rates of erosion and accretion over time. Describe the methodology
used to determine the approximate rates of erosion and accretion and assess the accuracy of the
calculated rates. This should include a table providing the distance each of these unstable
shoreline areas has moved landward or seaward over the specified periods of time and the rate
of erosion or rate of accretion for that particular area.
Discuss the relative contribution of incident coastal processes to the measured shoreline erosion.
Include also the contribution of factors affecting bluff stability in appropriate locations.
Map products:
Map showing the areas of erosion and areas of accretion based on an examination of historical
maps and air photos, and keyed to the table above.
TASK B2:
Review the shoreline development within this reach.
Products:
Expanding on the analysis conducted in Task A2, provide a comprehensive presentation of the
land use adjacent to the shoreline in this reach, noting developed shoreline parcels which would
be seriously impacted by continued shoreline flooding and erosion.
Discuss public and private land use practices in the reach which directly influence land stability
relative to shoreline erosion.
A table should be prepared identifying each of the shore protection structures within the reach
and providing a general description including the location, age, size, type of construction,
ownership of the structure, land ownership, permit history, and general condition of each
structure.
TASK B3:
Identify the direction of littoral drift, the net volumes of sediment transported in
the longshore direction, seasonal and annual variations in the longshore sediment
transport where possible, and the sediment sources and sinks.
Products:
Within the reach as a whole, and within the sub-reaches identified below, discuss the direction
of littoral drift and any variations that occur, the sediment sources and the sediment sinks that
may exist. Based on the physical shoreline changes identified in Tasks B I and B2 and
calculations based on historical maps and air photos, a table should be included showing the
estimated net annual longshore transport volumes within the reach and sub-reaches over the time
intervals identified in Task B I.
Sub-reaches for the purpose of this analysis include:
I. Duck Pond Point to Goldsmith Inlet
2. Goldsmith Inlet to Bittner Groin
3. Bittner Groin to westernmost Lockman Groin
4. Lockman Groin field
5. Kenny's Beach (easternmost Lockman groin to Kenny Rd)
6. Horton Beach (Kenny Rd to Horton Pt)
7
TASK B4
Using a sediment budget approach, determine the impact of each shore
perpendicular structure within this reach on the littoral transport volumes and the
rate of shoreline erosion/accretion.
Products:
Prepare a simple sediment budget that would examine the sediment sources and sinks and identify
the quantities of sediment into and out of the entire reach and each of the sub-reaches identified
in Task B3, over each of the time intervals identified in Task B I.
Compare sediment transport between each time interval for each sub-reach and the reach as a
whole, to determine if measurable impacts are occurring as a result of existing shore protection
structures. Where possible, impacts should be quantified.
Compare measurable impacts due to disruption of longshore transport with erosion identified in
Task B I. Discuss whether restoring the natural sediment transport would significantly reduce the
erosion that is presently occurring in these areas.
TASK B5:
Assess the condition of the shoreline in the reach with a focus on the beaches
adjacent to each of the shore perpendicular and shore parallel structures within
the reach.
Products:
U sing the information developed in Tasks B I-B4, assess the condition of the shoreline in the
reach in general and in the sub-reaches. Where feasible, note the impact of each shore
perpendicular and shore parallel structure within the reach.
Discuss the effects structures in the reach over time and the extent of these effects along the
shoreline.
Discuss the potential future shoreline condition assuming current management practices continue.
TASK B6
Identify the range of methods available for addressing shoreline erosion
problems.
Products:
U sing the general reach analysis completed in Tasks A3-A6 and the specific reach information
developed in Tasks BI-B5, discuss the various options and combinations of options available to
the Town for addressing erosion, including non-structural, soft-structural, and hard structural
methods, and the positive and negative impacts of each option. Identify appropriate timing for
implementation of options.
Discuss the effectiveness as an erosion control method, of modifying the existing shore protection
structures to restore the natural sediment transport. This discussion should be based on an
analysis of potential impacts which would occur in the reach derived from simple model studies
and available case histories.
Non-structural approaches should identify opportunities available to the Town for relocation,
acquisition, regulatory changes, zoning changes, fiscal expenditure changes, and various
8
incentives and disincentives to influence development practices and existing land use. Discussion
of appropriate post-storm approaches should be included.
TASK B7:
Recommend the most suitable method(s) for short and long term management of
this section of shoreline.
Products:
Recommend the best method(s) of managing this section of shoreline and the individual parcels,
based on a consideration of the existing conditions and future trends as presented in the general
reach analysis and clarified by this specific analysis.
If modification of existing shore protection is recommended, explain in detail the type of
alteration to be made, estimate the cost to modify the structure, and discuss the positive and
negative impacts updrift and downdrift of the remaining structure due to typical coastal conditions
and severe storm events.
If non-structural alternatives are recommended, explain in detail the procedures which should be
followed by the Town for implementation. Estimate the cost(s) for this recommendation.
Discuss the positive and negative impacts which would result from this method.
If structural alternatives are recommended, explain in detail the type of construction required,
estimate the cost of construction and maintenance, and outline the procedure which the Town
should follow for implementation. Discuss the positive and negative impacts which could result
from this structural recommendation.
C. Five copies of the final draft Local Erosion Management Plan including comments on the draft
report provided by the Department of State and the Town of Southald, and a 3.5" floppy disk
containing the report in WordPerfect 5.1 format.
5. Proposal Requirements
Each proposal received will be carefully evaluated for its technical merit. The following items must be
addressed in the proposal. Those proposals which most satisfactorily address the following items will
be considered in the final selection:
A. A work program for performing the Flooding and Erosion Inventory and Analysis based on the
performance standards set forth in Section 3, Performance Standards, and provisions for
delivering all data products listed in Section 4, Deliverables as a minimum. Work program
should show the Contractor's ability to provide the necessary products and meet the deadlines for
delivery described in Section 4, Deliverables. Work program should also discuss the
methodology and specify sources of information for performing the Local Erosion Management
Program.
B. Your firm's ability to perform the required services. Names, titles, qualifications, and relative
contribution of all the individuals who will be providing their services should be given for
evaluation. Indicate how their combined qualifications! assignments enable them to competently
9
complete the work. Your firm's direct experience in the inventory and analysis of geological
conditions, coastal processes and hazard management planning in the coastal environment should
be presented.
C. Your firm's fee for performing the required services. The funding available for completing this
flooding and erosion inventory and analysis and plan development is limited to $45,000. For bids
up to this amount, full payment will be made for all services provided. Bids exceeding $45,000
will not be accepted. A list of all the data products in Section 4, Deliverables that could be
provided for a charge of $45,000 will be acceptable in the event that available funds are
insufficient to complete Section 4 in its entirety.
6. Schedule of Work
The following schedule of major milestones and accompanying completion dates shall be maintained in
developing the final draft Local Erosion Management Program for the Town of Southold.
MAJOR MILESTONE: DUE DATE:
Issue Request For Proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11/94
Pre-proposal meeting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11/94
Proposal Due Date ........................................... 11/94
Proposal Review and Selection ................................... 11/94
Contract Award Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11/94
Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Work Program
and Meeting .......................................... 12/94
Public Meeting # 1 ........................................... 12/94
Progress meeting w/Town & DOS ................................. 01/95
Progress meeting w/Town & DOS ................................. 02/95
Draft Local Erosion Management Program ............................ 03/95
Public Meeting # 2 ............................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03/95
Comments from DOS and Town on
Consultant Draft Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03/95
Final Draft Local Erosion Management Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03/31/95
10
ATI'ACHMENT 1: REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACT MAP PRODUCTS
GENERAL MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
The following general cartographic requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor:
1) Map Products -- The Division's preference is for the delivery of digital map products that meet the
specifications outlined in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section. If analog map products are
produced, they must meet specifications outlined in the Digital-Ready Map Product Requirements section.
The ability to provide digital map products will be one of the factors used in selecting a Contractor.
2) Deliverable Format -- All digital map and attribute table f1Ies must be provided in Maplnfo 3.0 for
Windows format on 4 mm DAT tape or 3.5" floppy diskette media. Alternatively, the digital products
may be provided in UNIX or PC ARC/INFO binary format or AutoCAD DXF format on the same media
types upon approval of the Division. All other digital formats require prior approval of the Division.
All non-digital map products must be provided on stable base material at a scale agreed upon by the
Division. The map products must include an index map to all map sheets and thorough descriptions of
all the cartographic elements portrayed on the maps.
3) Documentation -- A data dictionary must be included along with the map files describing file contents,
file names, map projection, coordinate system, RMS accuracy, information sources, and creation
methodology .
4) Map Accuracy - Unless otherwise stated by the Division, all deliverable map products must conform
to National Map Accuracy Standards for horizontal accuracy as established by the United States
Geological Survey (USGS). For example, maps at I :20,000 or smaller, not more than 10% of the well-
defined map points tested must be more than 1/50 inch (5 mm) out of correct position. At I :24,000, this
tolerance translates to a required horizontal accuracy of 40 feet.
DIGITAL CARTOGRAPmC FILE REQUIREMENTS
The following cartographic construction requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor:
1) Edge-matching -- All map sheets must be both visually and coordinate edge-matched with adjacent
map sheets. No edge-match tolerance will be allowed. Attributes for splitable features must also be
identical.
2) Common Boundaries -- All features that share a common boundary, regardless of map layer, must
have exactly the same coordinate position of that feature in all common layers.
3) Point Duplication -- No duplication of points that occur within a data string is permitted.
4) Connectivity -- Where graphic elements visually meet, they must be also digitally meet. All
confluences of line and polygon data must be exact; "overshoots", "undershoots", "slivers", or
"offshoots" are NOT permitted.
II
5) Line Quality -- A high quality cartographic appearance must be achieved. Transitions from straight
lines to curvilinear elements must be smooth, with angular inflections at the point of intersection. The
digital representation must not contain extraneous data at a non visible level. There should be no jags,
hooks, or zero length segments. Any lines that are straight, or should be straight, should be digitized
using only two points that represent the beginning and ending points of the line.
6) Polygon Closure -- For area features being digitized, the last coordinate pair must be exactly
(mathematically) equal to the first coordinate pair. No line or polygon must cross itself except to join
at an actual confluence. All digitized features across map boundaries must be edited to effect smooth and
continuous lines.
7) Graphic Precision -- All digital graphic elements must contain positional coordinates significant to
one thousandth (.001) of a foot.
8) Digitizer Accuracy -- The required RMS error for digitizer accuracy must be .003 or better for digital
map registration.
DIGITAL-READY MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS
The following requirements for non-digital map products must be followed to facilitate the future
conversion of the maps to digital map products.
1) Base Map Media -- All maps must be created on mylar or other stable base material.
2) Map Scale -- All maps of a similar series should be created using the same base scale. Unless
otherwise stated by the Division, all maps should be compiled at 1 :24,000. If other map scales are
approved by the Division, they will conform to standard map scales such as 1 :9600; 1 :50,000; 1 :75,000;
or 1:100,000.
3) Map Registration -- The maps must provide a minimum of four (4) corner and four (4) interior ticks
tied to USGS/NYSDOT quadrangle LatlLong or NYTM coordinates. The maps must be geometrically
correct and should register when overlaid on the appropriate USGS/NYSDOT quadrangle control ticks:
4) Map Projection and Datum -- The maps must include the map projection and the map datum used.
5) Map Title and Legend -- The maps must provide a title and legend block describing the information
contained on the maps.
6) Cartographic Quality -- The quality of all map line work and symbolization must conform to items
I - 6 in the map criteria set forth in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section outlined above;
12
CONTRACT DATABASE STANDARDS
Delivery Media
All database and tabular files must be delivered on 4 mm Digital Audio Tape (OAT) or 3.5" diskette.
Delivery in anotber media format must have prior approval of tbe Division.
Software Fonnat
All database and tabular files must be provided in Borland's Paradox for Windows version 4.5 format.
Otber formats tbat are convertible to Paradox may be used witb prior approval of tbe Division.
Geographic Attributes
Database and tabular files tbat contain elements witb a geographic reference must provide a corresponding
data field and a geographic coordinate pair for each feature location.
13