The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHarbor Management Plan I I I I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I Harbor "loDgement Plan Proposal SUBMITTED TO: the Town of Southold SUBMITTED BY: Allee King Rosen & Fleming, In<:. December G, 1994 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 117 Easl 29th Street' New York. NY 10016' 212/696-0670 FAX Number 212/213-3191 December 5, 1994 Ms. Judith Terry, Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York Town Clerk 11971 RE: Proposal to Provide Consulting Services Town of Southold Harbor Management Plan Dear Ms. Terry: Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to assist the Town of Southold in the preparation of its Harbor Management Plan. As stated in the request for proposals, "the purpose of this study is to be a comprehensive examination of all the surface waters within and adjacent to the Town and to identify problems of conflict, congestion and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands." We see this work and its objectives as an important project in support of the Town's maritime industry, recreational boating activities, and economy. Ultimately, this will be a significant element in the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). For this project, we have assembled a team that is specific to the Town needs as defined by the scope of work. Our team consists of: o Allee King Rosen & Fleming. Inc. is well known throughout the state as a leader in the field of environmental analysis, waterfront plan- ning, and policy analysis. We are a multidisciplinary consulting firm with particular experience in waterfront studies and coastal zone management. Allee King will lead the team and be responsible for the final product, preparation of draft policies and recommenda- tions, the environmental and planning studies, project management, and client contact. I will be the Project Manager; assisting me will be Robert White. o Neil Ross Consultants will provide technical assistance in the prepa- ration of the marina inventory work as well as the strategy and poli- cy recommendations. Mr. Ross is a nationally known specialist in the field of marina inventory and investigation (he led the U.S. National Marina Inventory of more than 8,300 facilities), boating and harbor activities, and in providing direction on ecologically sound maritime practices. I I Ms. Terry I I I I -2- December 5, 1994 o The Sarato~a Associates -- a firm of planners, engineers, and land- scape architects -- will lead the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping. Saratoga Associates is highly experienced in GIS map- ping and presentation, and has worked on many planning and design projects across the state. o Mr. George Hossfeld is a longtime marina operator on the Long Is- land's north shore with more than 40 years of experience in operating the Jakobson shipyard and marina at Oyster Bay. Mr. Hossfeld's work- ing knowledge of marina and harbor activities will be important in developing policies and recommendations. Our team brings to this project a full range of services, including expe- rience in the fields of waterfront and coastal management policy and planning, harbor management, water quality planning, waterfront environmental concerns, and "hands-ontl experience in marina operation and waterfront management. I I I I I I I I Our proposal is composed of: o Section I: Approach to Work. In this section, we explain the meth- ods and techniques, references, and strategies for undertaking the various tasks for this project. o Section II: Organization and Schedule. This section outlines the organization of the project team, including the Town and State staff and the efforts and responsibilities of the team members. o Section III: Cost Estimates and Rates. hours of effort, costs by task, and the team members. This section provides the hourly rates for each of the o Section IV: Proiect Team Oualifications and Experience. Briefs on the various projects and experience of the team members are provided as well as individual resumes. We have also enclosed the required certified check for 10 percent of the proposal fee. We believe our team offers the breadth of knowledge, skills, dedication, and experience necessary to provide a high quality product that will allow the Town to move forward with its harbor management planning and complete an impor- tant element in its LWRP. As you know, we have submitted a proposal to the Town for the Local Erosion Management Plan, which is also to be an important element in the LWRP. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ms. Terry -3- If you or anyone in the selection group call me at (212) 340-9795. We thank you for to working with the Town. Sincerely, ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, Inc., f*e~~ Philip C. Sears Vice President cc: R. White PCS:wp P:\1994\southhar.let December 5, 1994 has any questions for us, please this opportunity and look forward I I I I. I II. I III. IV. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table of Contents Approach to Work................................................................................................................1_1 Organization and Schedule................................................................................................11_1 Cost Estimates and Rates .................................................................................................111_1 Project Team Experience, Resume, and References.......................................................IV-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. Approach to Work EJ!Ilntroduction As stated in the Request for Proposals (RFPl. the project goal is to develop a strategy for managing activities in the harbor and nearshore areas of the Town through a com- prehensive Harbor Management Plan. Ultimately, this plan will be part of the Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP), currently in draft form, and local regulations could be enacted by the Town Board to effectuate the goals and recommendations of the plan. It is the intention to complete the LWRP in the first half of 1995. This study will be used to develop an important component of the LWRP. Specifically, this project will provide guidance in how to manage boat traffic; general harbor uses; identification of appropriate locations for boat support structures, such as docks, piers, and moorings; pump-out facilities and spe- cial anchorage areas; and the classification of local and federal navigation channels. It will develop alternatives for use of the waterfront and identify their probable effects. Ancillary to the Town's completion of a Townwide Harbor Management Plan and its LWRP, there are two main areas of attention in this effort: 1) an inven- tory and analysis of recreational marinas in the Town; and 2) the preparation of a detailed Harbor Management Program for Mattituck Inlet. [lI Overview to the Work Program We see seven steps to this comprehensive planning effort: . Identify the problem; . Select goals to achieve problem resolution; . Gather the baseline data and information; . Develop alternative solutions to meet the goals; . Evaluate the alternatives; . Selection of an approach/strategies; and . Implementation. As outlined in the RFP, this study has five major tasks. Each task is discussed in greater detail below. Task 1: Identification and Mapping of the Harbor Management Study Area There are 10 shoreline reaches to be analyzed; 4 along the Sound, 5 along the bays, and Fisher Island. Mattituck Inlet is Reach 1. The study area will be the marine waters of the Town, or extending out to 1,500 feet from the shore- line, whichever is greater. Adjacent inland activities, including land uses-both maritime and general land use patterns-as well as natural and cultural features will be depicted where they are relevant to the use and manage- ment of surface waters and underwater lands. Working closely with the Town and state, we will devel- op a digital inventory of natural and built features within the study area. We are experienced in using both ARC/INFO or MapInfo for the creation and analysis of digital inventories and will work with the Town and state to determine which software best meets the project needs. As an initial action, we will meet with the Town and state to define in greater detail what is needed for each data layer, determine to what extent existing data will meet the needs of the project, and prioritize the data development process. The project budget does not allow creating a hard copy map of the inventory; however, the digital informa- tion will be submitted to the Town. Subsequent actions for developing and managing the GIS inventory are out- lined in greater detail below. To the extent possible, we will rely on existing digital data that meet the data standards outlined in Attachment 3 of the RFP. For example, it is our understanding that digital parcel boundaries, parcel centroids, and shoreline boundaries for the town have been prepared by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA). We also antici- pate using existing Digital Line Graph (DLG) data to rep- resent roads, streams, and many other elements of the inventory. For this effort, we propose to use digital baseline map products being prepared for the Erosion Management Plan that would be adjusted to meet the needs of this study. Townwide plan products would be at the 1:24,000 scale of the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) map as recommended in the RFP. A. Develop Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Procedures Our experience indicates that tight project schedules and limited budgets may compromise cartographic integrity. Therefore, we propose a stringent QAlQC procedure to protect the inventory and client require- ments. To ensure that all data included in the inventory are suitable for the project purposes, procedures will be established to verify that certain quality standards are met. Standard indicators of data quality to be consid- ered include: I-I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. Approach to Work Southold Harbor Management Plan Proposal . Positional Accuracy. How exact is the geograph ic location of the features represented in the data layer; . Accuracy of Attribute Information. Is the infor- mation associated with geographic features cor- rect? and . Completeness of the Data Layer. Are there fea- tures missing from the data later? Each data layer will go through a process of QA/QC checks before it is approved for inclusion in the inventory, including: . In-process checks (occurring as the data layers are being developed, by using such techniques as setting digitizing error tolerance); and · Town of Southold/New York State Department of State (NYSDOS) review. B. Document Data Sources and Quality To use the inventory in a convenient and accurate manner, it is important that a detailed record of infor- mation contained within each data layer be main- tained. A "data dictionary" will be designed to cata- log pertinent information about each of the data lay- ers. The following are examples of the type of infor- mation to be included in the data dictionary: . Data layer name; . Vintage; . Scale; . Data source; . Description of attribute information; and . Last update. C. Develop Initial Attribute Coding Scheme Information about a geographic features will be stored in an appropriate reference coding system. These codes are then used to efficiently select, query, and analyze geographic features. D. Establish Data Layer Naming Convention A logical system for naming the different data layers will be developed, allowing for descriptive and unique computer file names. E. Establish Backup Procedures To m;n;m;~e recovery time due to data loss, proce- dures will be routinely followed to back up all com- piled source data, work-in-progress, and complete data layers. F. Establish GIS Format We will use either an ARC/INFO or Maplnfo GIS for- mat for the project. The data layers developed in the next phase will then be stored in the preferred GIS format. Task 2: Data Inventory and Analysis Data Inventory This task will compile a comprehensive inventory of mar- itime activities, both commercial and recreational, as well as the natural, cultural, aesthetic, and recreational uses and activities within the study area, including a full inventory of all marinas in the Town. The marina inven- tory will provide a comprehensive database on current boating activities and the adequacy of available facilities. Results of this work will be important for examining the Town's future maritime infrastructure needs. Available references and maps developed by the Town and state include: . The Mattituck Inlet Study and Watershed Analysis (with a map); . An Inventory of Natural Resources in Mattituck Inlet; . The Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Policy 2-Water Dependent Uses; . A Parking Study of Marinas; . A study of development in marine zones; . The local Water Quality Assessment; . A road run-off study, plus the addendum of the shellfish Advisory Committee; . Aerial maps dating from 1988 and 1993; . Land use and zoning maps; . MI and MIl zoning ordinances; . Site plans of certain marinas; . RPPW Master Plan Studies; . A listing of properties that have Town trustee permits for docks, bulkheads, jetties, groins, and houses; and . A list of moorings. Additional reference data will be gathered from the Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program, such mar- itime gnides as the Waterway Guide published by Boating Industry Magazine, and local National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Nautical Charts, avail- able inventories of historical structures, historical records on shipwrecks, and other publications and references as relevant, many of which Mr. Neil Ross has authored or co- authored (see section IV). 1-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. Issues and Understanding of the Project Southold Harbor Management Plan Proposal Empirical data will be collected from field surveys and interviews with local officials, representatives, and mari. na operators. The focus of our effort will be on recre- ational marina activities and facilities. We expect this work to involve a series of interviews with town officials and maritime operators, the coast guard, and harbor police or bay constable. The inventory will also include an evaluation of the marinas in relationship to the ecolo- gy in the immediate area, including water quality, wet- lands, and the presence of shellfish beds, vegetation, and fish and wildlife habitats. After completion of the base- line data gathering, the results will be put into tabular and text form. Graphics will show the relevant data within the study area. Analysis This analysis and evaluation will support the recommen- dations and strategies proposed in the Harbor Management Plan. To be undertaken with the Town and state, this work will ultimately result in a series of poli- cies and strategies, establishing both long- and short-term goals and objectives for resolution of the problems and issues disclosed in the baseline data gathering. As demonstrated by our qualifications and experience (section IV), Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. and Mr. Neil Ross will bring to this analysis a particular expertise in problem-solving and public policy strategy within the realm of maritime planning. We will work closely with the Town and state in formulating the strategies that will be derived from this effort. This evaluation will include, but not be limited to, assessments of competing and potentially conflicting uses, constraints on maritime uses, uses ofregional importance, an overview of the regulato- ry environment (local. state, and federall with respect to construction of maritime physical structures and the pres- ences of physical and natural features along the water's edge. In addition to Mattituck Inlet, discrete harbor man- agement units may be identified as a result of this effort. In these areas, specific policies and recommendations may be appropriate. This effort will also identify any gaps in information or areas where further study is recom- mended. Task 3: Development of a Draft Townwide Harbor Management Plan Using text and graphics, the policies and recommenda- tions developed under Task 2 will be compiled into an overall water use plan for the study area. Each reach will be shown with the identified plan recommendations, pre- senting the recommended uses for the surface water and the underwater lands as well as any necessary capital improvements. Areas of specific regulation necessary for the implementation of the plan will be outlined. The underlying purpose of this plan is to present reason- able and practical solutions to the identified problems and conflicts. It will address the full range of maritime infrastructure needs, both in the water- such as naviga- tion channels, open water areas, and anchorages-and upland, including dry rack storage, parking. and traffic circulation. This plan could propose a number of alterna- tives solutions to particular problems and disclose the environmental and planning consequences of such alter- native recommendations. Task 4: Draft Harbor Management Program for Mattituck Inlet Task 4 will focus specifically on the issues about Mattituck Inlet. In conjunction with the Town and state, we will develop a detailed Harbor Management Program for the inlet that will be consistent with and apply the issues of the overall plan, such as competing and poten- tially conflicting uses, constraints on maritime uses, and uses of a regional importance. Ultimately, this effort will create a map showing the existing and recommended reg- ulations for uses along the inlet surface waters and under- water lands, as well as its natural and cultural features and any recommended capital improvements. Because the focus of the inlet plan study area is smaller, a larger- scale map would more appropriate. As with the larger plan, the inlet plan could include alternative solutions to particular problems and disclose the planning and envi- ronmental consequences of the alternatives. Task 5: Final Draft On completion of all text and graphics, five copies of a draft report will be submitted to the Town and state for their review. There will be two parts to the report: a townwide Harbor Management Plan and a detailed unit Harbor Management Plan for Mattituck Inlet. The report will include a discussion of the methodologies used as well as all references and sources of information. A pub- lic meeting will then be held to present and discuss the draft plan. To complete the study, a final draft report will be prepared incorporating the comments and recommen- dations of the Town and state. Text and graphics will be modified accordingly and five final copies will be sub- mitted along with a 3.5-inch disk that provides the text in WordPerfect 5.1 format and all graphics. 1-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II. Organization and Schedule fJ!I Project Organization As shown in the organization chart (Figure II-1), this proj- ect will be a cooperative effort between the Town, the state, and the consultant. Ultimately, this work will become part of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and provide guidance to local officials for plan- ning decisions and possible enactment of local laws and zoning changes. Therefore, the work will be conducted under the guidance of a subcommittee of the Town's Waterfront Advisory Committee and coordinated by the Town Planning Department, with technical assistance and input from the Department of State's Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization. Allee King's project manager will be Mr. Philip Sears. Mr. Sears has extensive experience and background in mar- itime studies and is widely published in the field of mar- itime and coastal program and policy issues. As project manager, he will be responsible for, oversee, and organize all work products and technical data and will be actively involved in the development and preparation of the report. A full copy of Mr. Sears' resume is provided below in section IV of this proposal. Mr. Robert White will be the Deputy Project Manager. Mr. White is a senior environmental planner, a member of the American Institute of Certified Planners, and a licensed Professional Planner in the State of New Jersey. He has more than 11 years' experience in the profession, with much of his work focusing on coastal environment, mas- ter planing, and zoning. Mr. White has led a number of environmental impact statements for the firm that have addressed coastal development issues, and has also obtained federal permits for construction in water (Section 10) and dredging (Section 404). A full copy of Mr. White's resume is also provided in section IV. Working with Allee King will be Neil W. Ross and George Hossfeld, Jr. Mr. Ross is a nationally known expert in the field of marina and boating studies as well as assessments of marina operations and water quality impacts. Mr. Hossfeld has more than 40 years of experience as the operator of Jakobsen's shipyard in Oyster Bay, and brings an extensive hands-on experience to our team. Mapping will be prepared by Saratoga Associates under the direc- tion of Brian McMahon. A working relationship among the Town and state staff and representatives and the consultant team will be cru- cial to the success of this study. This includes the Town trustees, many of whom are knowledgeable of the issues at hand; the members of the Waterfront Advisory Committee and the Harbor Management subcommittee; the Departments of Planning and Community Development and other appropriate agencies; and techni- cal staff from the Department of State's Division of Coastal Resources. This combined and coordinated effort will be vital in developing gathering baseline data and construc- tive and practical policies and recommendations. As part of this cooperative effort, we also anticipate local assistance ("in-kind" services) from Town staff, commit- tees, and other representatives in a number of areas, including making available previously prepared reports, back-up files, and summaries; establishing local contacts and arranging meetings with Town departments and rep- resentatives as well as marina operators and other indi- viduals; assistance in field surveys and interviews; arranging public notices and organizing the public meet- ings, as well as providing any handouts or project sum- maries; and provision of craft for marine field investiga- tions. []I Project Schedule This project requires a sizable work effort over a very fast track. about 3 months or 12 weeks (see Figure II-2). Our team brings to this project a proven record of providing quality work in a timely and efficient manner. Allee King Rosen and Fleming, Inc. has a multidisciplinary staff of more than 40 planners, engineers, environmental scien- tists, and transportation and historic resources specialists on whom we can draw to complete this effort. Moreover, this diversity in staff and experience allows us to address specific environmental and planning issues as they occur in the course of this effort. Weare also joined on this project by a team of individuals equally dedicated and respected in their ability to provide high quality products on a fast track schedule. Allee King believes in close communication with clients. To achieve this goal, from the start of work we will estab- lish ongoing contact with Town and state staff. We have found this to be the most effective technique for ensuring client satisfaction and a high quality product. We pro- pose a start-up meeting in late December between the Town, the state, and the consultant in which the project team can exchange ideas and available data and reports, as well as establish group and individual responsibilities and roles in the project studies. In addition, if deemed appropriate by the Town and state, three project team meetings could be held to coordinate the team and ensure product quality and schedule. At these meetings, certain II-I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Town of South old Waterfront Advisory Committee Harbor Management Plan Subcommittee New York Department of State Town of South old Division of Coastal Resources Planning Department and Waterfront Revitalization Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. Neil Ross Associates The Saratoga Associates Mr. George Hossfeld Figure IT-I Project Organization Harbor Management Plan Proposal - - ----------------- DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH TASKS Consultant Selection and Start of Work Indentilication and Mapping of Harbor Management Study Area Data Inventory and Analysis Development of Water Use Plan and Mattituck Inlet Harbor Management Plan Preparation of Draft Report Town and State Review of Draft Report Incorporating Comments, Final Amendments, and Submission of Five Copies . Project Team Meetings . Public Meetings Figure 11-2 Project Schedule I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II. Organization and Schedule Southold Harbor Management Plan Proposal products-such as mapping and the results of data gath- ering-will be presented for review. This will expedite and simplify the review of the final product. We also pro- pose a closing meeting to present the final report. Two public meetings are proposed. The first is tentative- ly scheduled for late December. However, to increase the opportunity for public input [which is difficult to obtain during the holiday season), we feel that an early January meeting would be preferable. These meetings could be held jointly with those on the Local Erosion Management Plan, which is on the same schedule. 11-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III. Cost Estimates and Rates Provided on the following pages are a table that shows the total estimated costs for the work to be undertaken and the hours of effort (see Table ill-i). Billing rates for Allee King Rosen & Fleming. Inc., Saratoga Associates, Mr. Neil Ross, and Mr. George Hossfeld are provide in Table ill-2. It has been stated that consideration will be given to an interim payment rather just one final lump sum payment. We request a 50 percent interim payment at the comple- tion of the data inventory and analysis, which is estimat, ed to be completed in mid-February 1995. III-I ------------------- SOUTHOLD HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, Inc. COST ESTIMATES Sr. Proj. Sr. Total Total Direct Total OfT. Plan. Plan. Map. Plan. Consult. Tech.I Tech.2 Hours Labor Expenses Cost 1. Mapping of Study Area 0 8 8 4 0 0 0 24 44 $2.640 $300 $2.940 2. Data Inventory and Anal. 4 8 32 0 32 12 4 0 92 $6,620 $100 $6,720 3. Development of Draft Water 4 16 32 0 32 0 0 0 84 $6,480 $100 $6,580 UselMatiituck Inlet Plans 4. Final Report Preparation 0 8 16 4 8 8 8 48 100 $5,680 $500 $6,180 5. Mana~ement/Meetin~s 4 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 24 $2,300 $50 $2,350 TOTALS 12 56 92 8 72 20 12 72 344 523.720 51.050 524.770 05-Dec-94 III. Cost Estimates and Rates Southold Harbor Management Plan Proposal I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table m-2 HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE Allee King Rosen & Fleming. Inc. Officer $160 Senior Planner 85 Planner 65 Tecbnician 1 55 Technician 2 45 Neil W. Ross Associates Project Planner 75 Saratoga Associates Senior Mapper Tecbnician 1 70 45 George Hossfeld 50 111-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References Introduction to the Team Our project team is com posed of: . Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc., one of the lead- ing planning and environmental consultants in New York State; . Neil Ross Associates, specialists in marina and har- bor management planning and analysis issues; . The Saratoga Associates, a planning and engineer- ing firm with extensive experience in land planning and mapping; and . Mr. George Hossfeld, an experienced shipyard and marina operator with extensive knowledge of issues on the North Fork. Provided below are details on each of these firms and Mr. Hossfeld. Allee King Rosen & Fleming [JI Overview Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc., founded in 1981, is a consulting firm specializing in environmental and plan- ning services. Since its establishment, the firm has grown into one of the largest and most respected environmental planning firms in New York State. The firm's cost-effec- tive and timely performance is rooted in the expertise of our professionals and our reputation for skillful and pro- ductive interaction with the public and, in particular, governmental agencies. The firm's experience includes preparing environmental analysis and providing techni- cal expertise for government agencies and private clients. Since opening its doors more than 13 years ago, the firm has undertaken more than 500 planning and environmen- tal projects, a large number of which were multifaceted or politically sensitive. These projects range from master planning studies for municipalities and community groups to environmental reviews for complex and contro- versial development projects. [lI Planning and Environmental Services The firm offers a full range of planning and environmen- tal services, including: . Marina, Port, and Other Waterfront Facilities Analysis . Coastal Zone Management . Waterfront Revitalization Program Consistency Determination . Wetlands and Ecosystem Evaluation . Land Use Planning and Impact Analysis . Water Quality Sampling and Modeling . Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology . Hydrogeology . Permit Applications and Acquisitions . Community Resources Planning and Analysis . Demographic Analyses . Socioeconomic Impact Analysis . Real Estate Market Analyses . Employment, Fiscal Impact, and Local and Regional Economic Analysis . Cost-Benefit Analysis . Relocation Planning and Analysis . Community Character Impact Assessment . Historic and Archaeological Studies . Traffic Impact Studies . Environmental Geology and Soils . Public Participation Programs [3!1 Selected Waterfront and Coastal Projects Culloden Point Subdivision, Town of East Hampton, N.Y. The firm prepared an environmental impact statement (EIS] for this 62-unit subdivision proposed in the Town of East Hampton. With some 292 acres of waterfront land and 1.3 miles of project coastline (much of which is steep bluffs) along Fort Pond Bay and Block Island Sound, ero- sion along the shoreline and the potential impacts of the project on the stability of the bluffs was a major issue for the project. To assess trends over time. U.S. coastal maps dating back to 1838 were reviewed, wave action analyses were performed, photographic records before and after major coastal storms were recorded, an evaluation of aer- ial photographs from 1955 and 1992 was undertaken, and historical topographic maps of the site were compared. These analyses led to the establishment of appropriate setbacks for structures and the development of vegetation preservation easements along the bluffs. Other issues were the preservation of wetlands, potential impacts on archaeological features (both historic and prehistoric], protection of historic resources, protection of vegetation and rare and endangered species, preservation of views of the site from the water and of natural topographic fea- tures, and traffic and transportation. This project is cur- rently in subdivision review by the Town Planning Board. IV-I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References Southold Harbor Management Plan Proposal Colgate-Palmolive Company-450.Slip Marina Design, Jersey City, N.J. The most important issue raised with this project was how to design a marina that could attenuate waves from winds and boat traffic at an exposed location, where the Hudson River meets New York Harbor, while being envi- ronmentally sensitive and meeting the regulatory require- ments of the State of New Jersey. Wave studies showed that the largest impacts were from boat traffic along the Hudson River, particularly tugboats and ferry traffic to the Statue of Liberty. A system was developed that adequate- ly attenuated the wave wakes while meeting the prevail- ing environmental standards. Other issues addressed were public access and compatibility with the proposed waterfront promenade at the water's edge, the presence of dilapidated underwater piers, riparian issues, the dredg- ing and disposal of 40,000 cubic yards of sediment, poten- tial view iropacts on the Statue of Liberty from a nearby public park, and the availability of maritime support ser- vices as well as pump-out facilities and amenities for transient boaters. Allee King worked with the marina designers and the state to ensure that certain design ele- ments and public amenities were provided, which led to the issuance of the project's waterfront development per- mit in September 1990. Colgate-Palmolive Army Corps of Engineers Permits, Jersey City, N.J. Allee King provided environmental and planning services and led a project team through the federal regulatory process to obtain permits for the Colgate-Palmolive inter- im waterfront recreation and infrastructure improvement projects. This included a mooring field for 104 craft as well as a boathouse, pier rehabilitation, repair and replacement of about 1,100 feet of bulkhead, a ferry ser- vice, and the in-water construction of a manifold to col- lect and abate combined overflow discharges to the Hudson River. Issues addressed were the safety of moor- ing boats at this location, public access to the redeveloped pier, and the ecological and water quality impacts of fill- ing the river to construct the proposed manifold. An exlensive alternatives analysis was developed that dis- closed no practicable alternative for the routing of the proposed manifold. The analysis also revealed the mani- fold's impact on water quality to be beneficial, not harm- ful. Working with the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, all issues were resolved and a mitigation plan developed. Federal permits for the project were issued in June 1994. Jakobson Shipyard, Oyster Bay, N.Y. The firm has secured permits and is currently managing the dredging and disposal of 5,000 cubic yards of sedi- ment at this former maritime construction and repair facility. Much of this sediment contains hazardous mate- rials and is being disposed of at an upland location. For this effort, the firm designed an innovative sediment cleanup program that employs a vacuum removal system. With this approach, the contaminated sediment can be removed without the suspension of additional material and impacts on the water column. This work is being monitored by NYSDEC, the Friends of Oyster Bay, the Bay Constable, and the National Fish and Wildlife Service. Maritime Support Services Location Study, Port of New York and New Jersey This study focused on the land and berthing needs of the maritime support service firms-tugs, barges, and supply craft-in the Port of New York and New Jersey. The first task was to identify all the maritime support service firms on the port and their locations. The number of floating equipment, their type, and the number of employees for each company were determined by interviewing the com- panies and researching published sources. The growth of the industry was projected to 2000 and their needs for new equipment, employees, and land were determined. Siting considerations including hydrographic conditions, markets, and supplies, were analyzed for all areas of the port. Candidate areas were identified for each of the dif- ferent kinds of maritime support services. Within the can- didate areas, specific locations were chosen as example bases for maritime support service firms. Conceptual lay- outs were developed for each site, and the development costs were estimated. The costs were annualized, and the ability of maritime support service firms to absorb these costs were discussed. Finally, a list oftecommendations for maintaining these firms in the port through 2000 were developed. Most of the recommendations have been iroplemented since the report was issued. Hudson River Park, New York, N.Y. The firm is leading a consultant team to prepare a Generic EIS (GElS) and provide other services relating to the plan- ning and environmental review of the proposed Hudson River Park. The project, sponsored by the New York State Urban Development Corporation, would provide for the renewal of Manhattan's west side waterfront by develop- ing a park and selected existing piers as public recreation, residential, and/or commercial uses along an approxi- mately 4-mile-long area on the Hudson River. Upon IV-2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References Southold Harbor Management Plan Proposal completion, it will be the largest park developed in Manhattan since the expansion of Riverside Park in the 1930's. Major issues of the project include its consistency with the city's Waterfront Revitalization Program; preserva- tion of sensitive historic and archaeological resources; visual quality, as a result of the changed character of the waterfront; effects on the habitat and aquatic systems of the river; increased pedestrian activity; traffic, air quality, and noise, since the park would be adjacent to Route 9A; and increased wastewater generation. Chelsea Piers, New York, N.Y. The Chelsea Piers Limited Partnership retained the firm to prepare the environmental impact statement for the proposed redevelopment of the Chelsea piers [Piers 59 through 62) on the Hudson River for a variety of commer- cial and recreational uses. The key environmental issues are consistency with the city's waterfront zoning and Waterfront Revitalization Program, historic and archaeo- logical resources, economic conditions, traffic and trans- portation, water quality, and natural resources. Howland Hook Container Terminal- Environmental Services, Staten Island, N.Y. The firm was retained by Container Transport Technology, Inc. to provide ongoing consulting concern- ing general environmental issues relating to New York City's administrative processes and the permitting process at the state and federal level. Container Transport Technology, Inc. representing the United States Lines, is involved in the phased expansion of the Howland Hook Marine Terminal in Staten Island, the largest container port facility on the East Coast. The terminal expansion was being undertaken as a joint venture between the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and the city of New York. Lake Erie Waterfront Analysis and Projections, Buffalo Metropolitan Area, N.Y. As part of an analysis prepared for submittal to NYSDEC, the firm analyzed land use and economic changes in the Lake Erie waterfront area of the Buffalo metropolitan area. The analysis included real estate sales and values, land use plans and zoning, and economic growth. The area is a pattern of residential neighborhoods, parkland, and com- mercial areas. As the Buffalo metropolitan area has grown, the Lake Erie waterfront has been undergoing changes. For a primary area of about five miles and a broader secondary area, the analysis addressed the effects of policy changes on existing land uses and their viabili- ty, land use plans and zoning, and real estate sales and values, as well as ma=ket responsiveness to changes. Village of Southampton Planning/Impact Study, Southampton, N.Y. The firm prepared a planning study analyzing develop- ment trends currently affecting the character of the Village of Southampton in Long Island and suggested spe- cific methods to shape future growth. The report focused on topics of particular concern in Southampton, includ- ing change in community character, loss of open space, retail expansion, water quality, traffic, beach access, and affordable housing. Payton Lane Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center, Town of Southampton, N.Y. Located on a site that lies partially within the Town and partially within the Yillage of Southampton, this project involves the construction of a 280-bed facility and a senior day care cente,. The firm prepared an EIS in which the principal issues Ere site design and visual character, community facilities. traffic and transportation, geohy- drology, and wastewEter treatment. The firm prepared an EIS for a proposed 300-unit water- front housing complex at Prince's Bay. The residential development is planned to include condominium apart- ments, a 100-slip marilla, and other recreational facilities. The EIS includes aquatic and terrestrial ecology analysis, a wetlands assessment, and analyses of water quality, land use, transportation, and archaeological impacts. The firm is also providing guidance to obtain dredging and disposal permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and NYSDEC, and will review the project's eligibility for flood insurance as administered by New York City. The project's relationship to the city's Waterfront Revitalization Program was also analyzed. Queens West Waterfront Development, Queens, N.Y. The firm was retained by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to prepare an EIS for a proposed large- scale mixed-use development on the Hunters Point water- front in Queens, N.Y. With more than 1-1/4 miles of shorelines, major issues with this site were public access, waterfront recreation, water quality, and coastal zone management. Other EIS issues were land use, zoning, and community character; social and economic conditions; open space and recreational facilities; historic and IV-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References SouthoJd Harbor Management Plan Proposal archaeological resources; visual quality; and traffic and transportation. East River Landing, New York, N.Y. The firm provided environmental services and permit acquisition support for this project, which would be located on 23 acres of platform construction over the East River, adjacent to the financial district of Lower Manhattan. Located south of the South Street Seaport, the project is envisioned as a major mixed-use development to be constructed on pilings and a series of platforms. Public amenities and improvements, such as the contin- ued expansion of the East River esplanade, would also be provided as part of the project. The location and scale of the project necessitated a com- prehensive environmental impact analysis, with special emphasis on the relationship of the project to the South Street Seaport Historic district (including an underwater archaeological study); traffic, transportation, and air qual- ity impacts; water quality and marine biology; and urban design and planning policy. A range of environmental permits, including federal dredge and fill (Section 404), structures in navigable waterways (Section 10), state tidal wetlands, water quality (Section 401). and consistency with the city's Waterfront Revitalization Program would be required. Regatta Cove, Staten Island, N.Y. The firm prepared an EIS for Regatta Cove, a major mixed- use development consisting of approximately 300 resi- dential condominium units and two 150-slip marinas, located on the South Shore of Staten Island. The project is situated in the New York State Coastal Zone Management Area administered by the New York City Waterfront Revitalization Program. The firm has been involved in the initial environmental planning to help minimize waterfront damage and to facilitate permit approvals. These include a Section 10 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a Title 15 permit from New York State for disturbance of a streambed, and dredging permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Environmental Conservation. A notable feature of the project is the creation of a tidal wetlands as the focus of a primarily residential complex. Significant issues addressed for the EIS include consistency with the Waterfront Revitalization Program, change in neighbor- hood character, site access through the area's limited vehicular road network, and effect on wetlands and the marine environment. HarborPointe Redevelopment Project, Bridgeport, Conn. The firm was retained by the Bridgeport Redevelopment Agency to provide technical services and manage the preparation of an EIS for this major waterfront redevelop- ment project in downtown Bridgeport. The project, which is jointly sponsored by public and private interests, pro- poses to redevelop an underutilized 135-acre parcel of Long Island Sound waterfront area and represents the most substantial development in the city's history. It would include residential, office, retail, and industrial buildings; and a l,OOO-slip marina. The full range of envi- ronmental analyses were undertaken for this complex project; land use and community resources (including displacement and relocation), historical resources, eco- nomic and fiscal conditions, traffic and transportation, air quality. water resources, noise, infrastructure, and munic- ipal services. Town of Cortlandt, New York, Master Plan, Cortlandt, N.Y. In June 1991, Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. complet- ed a new Master Plan prepared for and in conjunction with the Town of Cortlandt in Westchester County. The first phase of the Master Plan project involved the prepa- ration of a Goals and Objectives Statement that highlight- ed the critical planning concerns identified by the Town. Focusing on these identified areas of concern, a Base Studies report was prepared that provided a community profile, a services and infrastructure assessment, and an environmental setting assessment. Policy recommenda- tions were developed by analyzing issues identified in the base studies in concert with the Town's goals and objec- tives. The next phase was the preparation of a Draft Master Plan. The plan included nearly 120 policy recom- mendations, as well as open space, land use, and circula- tion plans and a detailed strategy for implementation. Final public review and the preparation of a Generic EIS to satisfy SEQRA requirements were also completed. The Town Board of the Town of Cortlandt approved the Master Plan, with minor modifications, in January 1992. Town of Cortlandt, Zoning Ordinance Revision GElS, Cortlandt, N.Y. The firm has been retained to prepare the GElS in support of the new Town of Cortlandt Zoning Ordinance. Implementation of a comprehensive revision to the ordi- nance was a key component of the recently completed Town Master Plan (also prepared by the firm). The GElS will compare the proposed and existing ordinances and highlight the changes and new features associated with IV-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IV. Project Team Experience, Resumes, and References Southold Harbor Management Plan Proposal the revised ordinance. The GElS will examine the poten- tial impacts on land use, community character, natural resources, and cumulative and growth-inducing aspects of the proposed zoning ordinance. US Truck Body Plant, Jamaica Bay, N.Y. With the assistance of NYCEDC, this project is a proposed expansion of an industrial manufacturing complex on two city-owned parcels adjacent to Barbados Basin on Jamaica Bay in Rockaway, Queens. Of particular impor- tance are an analysis of effects on breeding areas for birds and other wildlife; the probable loss of a roost site for a small number of black-crowned night herons, a colonial water bird known to nest at two locations in Jamaica Bay; the loss of upland foraging habitat; and impacts on adja- cent tidal wetlands. Mitigation measures to lessen these impacts were proposed. The project's effects on coastal zone management, storm water runoff, land use and zon- ing, community resources, visual quality, historic and archaeological resources, social and economic conditions, traffic and transportation, air quality, noise, infrastruc- ture, and hazardous materials are also analyzed. [!]I Resumes Resumes for Philip C. Sears, Robert M. White, Arnold F. Fleming. and William Reynolds follow directly after page N-5 of this section of the proposal. Ell References Mr. John J. Huston Real Estate Project Director Colgate-Palmolive Company 300 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022-7499 212-310-3030 Ms. Lisa Liqouri, Director Town of East Hampton Planning Department 300 Pontigo Place Town of East Hampton, New York 11937 516-324-2178 Mr. Allan Marchisotto Moran Towing 2 Greenwich Plaza Greenwich, Connecticut 06830 203-625-7846 IV-S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PHlT .TP C. SEARS is a vice president of the firm with more than 19 years of experience in analyzing the impacts of projects around the world. He is the firm's technical director in charge of all its waterfront analyses. He has supervised surveys, studies, and designs involving water quality, coastal erosion and sedimentation, aquatic biology, wetlands, and terrestrial ecology. In addition, Mr. Sears has prepared and coordinated applications for Corps of Engineers and state resource agency permits for various waterfront projects. Mr. Sears' responsibilities include project management, supervision of technical staff, and task leadership for waterfront, water quality, natural resources, infrastructure, and contaminated materials analyses. Among his recent projects are: · Montauk, East Hampton, N. Y. -Calculated the erosion rate, including the effects of sea level rise, on the Fort Pond Bay shoreline. · Seguine Point, Staten Island-Project manager, overseeing the preparation of a report evaluating shoreline erosion for a Coastal Erosion Area Hazards permit, as well as preparation of SPDES, freshwater wetlands, and tidal wetlands permits. · US Truck Body, Jamaica Bay, N.Y.-Analyzed the effects of development on tidal wetlands fringing the site, evaluated the effects of storm water discharge from the site into the bay, and assessed the visual impacts of the project. . Great Kills Harbor, Staten Island-Prepared New York State Tidal Wetlands permit applications for the expansion of an existing Spanina marsh, construction and rehabilitation of a marina, and installation of a boardwalk along the shoreline. · Port of New York and New Jersey-Project manager for maritime support services location study. Tasks involved defining maritime support services, determining the size and future needs of the industries, finding potential locations in the port for them, and formulating policies to help retain these industries. · Queens West Development Project, Queens-Analyzed the consistency of the project with the Waterfront Revitalization Program and the effects of development on the shoreline. Before joining the firm, Mr. Sears directed a wide variety of water resources and waterfront-related projects, including: · Babylon, Long Island-Calculated erosion rate for the Cedar/Gilgo beaches and designed protective measures for the sewer line under the beach. · Long Island-Supervised inspection, design, and construction support of the rehabilitation of the boardwalk at Jones Beach as well as four fishing piers and a barge mooring pier. · New York Harbor-Supervised and conducted a detailed inspection of over 300 waterfront facilities in four locations, developed removal or repair plans for each facility, analyzed environ- mental impact of the plans, and developed cost estimates for each facility. · Massachusetts-Developed detailed plans for removal of PCB-laden sediments from the Housatonic River, including river diversion for dry removal, underwater removal, and river training works, and analyzed the environmental impact of the removal methods. 12/94 res I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I · New York Harbor-Surveyed New York Harbor for sources for drift material and debris, developed plans for the removal and disposal of derelicts and piers, prepared the New York Harbor Drift Removal Program, and conducted an in-depth management review of the present methods of debris collection and disposal. Education Marietta College, B.S., Geology, 1968; Old Dominion University, M.S., Oceanography,.1973. PublicatiolL'l and PresentatiOlL'l "Holocene Evolution of the Shelf Surface, Central and Southern Atlantic Shelf of North America" (with D.J.P. Swift, J.W. Kofoed, F.P. Saulsbury), Shelf Sediment Transpon: Process and Pattern, Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pa., 1972. "Estuarine and linoral depositional panerns in the surficial sand sheet, central and southern Atlantic Shelf of North America" (with D.J.P. Swift) in International Symposium on Inter-relationships of Estuarine and Continental Shelf Sedimentation, Bordeaux, Memoir 7, Institut de Georgie du Bassin d' Aquitaine. "Distribution and Genesis of Virginia-North Carolina Inner Shelf Sands" (with D.J.P. Swift, G.L. Shideler, B.W. Holliday and J.F. McHone), U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Center Technical Memo, 1974. "Evolution of a Shoal Retreat Massif, North Carolina Shelf: Inferences from Areal Geology" (with D.J.P. Swift, B. Bahlke, R. Hunt), Marine Geology, 1978. "Design of a Small Craft Harbour" (with R.A. EI Kawafi), Coastal Structures 79, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1979. "Renovation of New York Harbor" (with T. Civena), Coastal Zone Management 80, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1980. "Reuse of the Brooklyn Waterfront" (with T. Costanza), Coastal Zone 85, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1985. "Defining and Analyzing the Maritime Suppon Service Industries" (with K. Beasley, E. Hanhardt), Coastal Zone 91, American Society of Civil Engineers. Membership in ProressioD31 ~nj...molL'l American Society of Civil Engineers Years or Experience With Allee King Rosen & Fleming: 6. With other firms: 14. 12194 res I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ROBERT M. W HlTE, AlCP, PP, is an environmemal planner experienced in waterfront planning, environmental permitting, ecological studies, and zoning and master planning. In his more than 12 years of experience, he has been involved in projects throughout the New York metropolitan region, specifically in the five boroughs of New York City, northern and central New Jersey, and eastern Long Island. Since joining Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Mr. White has served as a manager for the following major projects : · Culloden Point Subdivision, Town of East Hampton, NY. Mr. White led the preparation of an environmemal impact statemem for this proposed 62-unit subdivision. With some 1.3 miles of coastline (much of which is bluffs) along Fort Pond Bay and Block Island Sound, erosion along the shoreline and potential impacts on the stability of the bluffs was a major issue. To assess trends over time, U.S. coastal maps dating back to 1838 were reviewed, wave action analyses were performed, photographic records before and after major coastal storms were recorded, an evaluation of aerial photographs from 1955 and 1992 were undertaken, andhistorical topographic maps of the site were compared. These analyses resulted in establishing appropriate setbacks for structures from the bluffs and implementing vegetation preservation easements. Other issues were the preservation of wetlands, potential impacts on archaeological features (both historic and prehistoric), protection of historic resources, protection of vegetation and rare and endangered species, preservation of views from the water and natural topographic features, and traffic and transportation. · Colgate-Palmolive Company-450-Slip Marina Design, Jersey City, NJ. The principal issue raised with this project was how to design a marina that could attenuate waves from winds and boat traffic at this exposed location while meeting the regulatory requirements of the State of New Jersey. Wave studies showed that the largest impacts were occurring from boat traffic associated with ferry travel to the Statue of Liberty. A system was ultimately developed that adequately attenuated the wave wakes while meeting the state environmental regulatory standards. Other issues were public access and compatibility with the waterfront promenade at the water's edge, the presence of dilapidated underwater piers, riparian issues, the dredging and disposal of 40,000 cubic yards of sediment, potential view impacts on the Statue of Liberty from a nearby public park, and the availability of maritime support services as well as pump-out facilities and amenities for transient boaters. Mr. White worked with the project designers and the state to ensure that certain amenities were provided and design changes were made that led to the issuance of a waterfront developmem permit for the project in September 1990. · Colgate-Palmolive Army Corps of Engineers Permits, Jersey City, NJ. Mr. White led a project team through the federal regulatory process to obtain permits for the Colgate-Palmolive interim nse project. This interim project included a mooring field for 104 craft as well as a boathouse, pier rehabilitation, repair and replacement of about 1,100 feet of bulkhead, a ferry, and the in-water construction of a manifold to collect and abate combined overflow discharges to the Hudson River. Issues addressed were the safety of mooring boats at this location, public access to the redeveloped pier, and the ecological and water quality impacts of fIlling the river to construct the proposed manifold. Under Mr. White's direction, an extensive alternatives analysis was developed that disclosed no practicable alternative for the routing of the proposed manifold. The analysis also revealed the manifold's impact on water quality would be beneficial, not harmful. Working with the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, these issues were resolved. Federal permits for the project (Sections 10 and 404) were issued in June 1994. 11/94 res I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I · East River Landing, New York, NY. Mr. White was the Assistant Project Manager in preparing baseline studies for this waterfront project proposed for development on piers off lower Manhat- tan. Environmental and planning data were gathered on water quality and ecology, public views and access, maritime activity, and the adequacy of the waterfront infrastructure and bulkhead. Before joining the firm, Mr. White's experience included: · Senior environmental planner with the Monmouth County (N.J.) Planning Board. Mr. White was specifically responsible for reviewing coastal development projects in the county. Many of these projects displaced existing maritime facilities, while other provided marina slips but no upland support facilities. Mr. White worked with the state in evaluating these changes and trends over time, and the potential effect on the recreational boating indnstry. Other issues were the potential for impacts on water quality and aquatic ecology, and the compatibility of projects with local zoning and master planning, and the county's Growth Management Plan, which contained specific policies related to coastal development and the preservation of the county's maritime industry. · Senior planner with the RBA Group, a planning and engineering firm based in Morristown, N.J., and New York City. While with RBA, Mr. White's experience included site selection and environmental and development feasibility services for the U.S. Postal Service's relocation of 13 facilities throughout the New York and New Jersey area, and a relocation feasibility study for a 150,OOO-square-foot carrier station currently located inmidtownManhattan; an environmen- tal assessment and development feasibility study of a 14-acre trucking facility in North Bergen, N.J., proposed for acquisition by New Jersey Transit Bus Operation, Inc.; an environmental assessment for an office complex proposed for a 4OQ-acre undeveloped site in Readington Town- ship, N.J.; the preparation of an E1S for a proposed widening of a 7-mile stretch of the Garden State Parkway, concentrating on the socioeconomic, water, and coastal resources analyses; site development feasibility studies for the Marriott Corporation's Courtyard Hotel projects proposed for the New York metropolitan region; and street design improvement reports for the City of New York, including 14th Street in Manhattan. Other prior experience includes assistance in preparing the EIS for Newport City, a 300-acre mixed-use waterfront development in Jersey City, N.J.; siting analyses for the disposal of resource recovery residu- als; and flood damage assessments for the Army Corps of Engineers. Mr. White also assisted in the preparation of two master planning studies and zoning recommendations for rural towns in western New Jersey. In addition, he has participated in a variety of zoning compatibility and variance application reviews and analyses. Education Rutgers University, B.A., Urban Studies/City Planning, 1982. New York University, Certificate in Business Management Practices, 1993. Professional Registration American Institute of Certified Planners Professional Planner, New Jersey Years of Experience With Allee King Rosen & Fleming: 71h. With other firms: 5. 11/94 res I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ARNOLD F. FLEMING, P .E., is principal and senior vice president of Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. and has been a professional engineer for more than 20 years. He has developed a panicular expenise in the environmental analyses of water quality issues. Some of Mr. Fleming's projects include: · Captain's Quaners Residential Development-Obtained permits from the Army Corps of Engi- neers pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act for this 290-unit town house development in Staten Island. · Port Regalle-Obtained Section 10 and 404 permits from the Army Corps and permits from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation pursuant to the Tidal Wetland Act and Protection of Waters Act for this 350-plus-unit residential condominium and marina in Great Kills Harbor in Staten Island. · HarborPointe-Preparing an application to the Army Corps for permits pursuant to Section 10 and Section 404 for this large waterfront development project in Bridgeport, Connecticut to allow for the development of a marina which requires dredging, fill, and bulkheading. · ShorehavenEstates-Preparing shoreline stabilization and tidal wetland permits for DEC approval in connection with this large residential project on the waterfront in the Bronx. The project is located adjacent to a wetland and is also in a flood plain. . Prince's Bay-Prepared a tidal wetland permit for DEC approval for this 3 ,OOO-unit condominium development located on a peninsula in the Raritan Bay in Staten Island. Mr. Fleming is also principal-in-charge for the EIS for the project. · Battery Park City-Obtained SPDES permit for a 30,OOO-gpm discharge of the commercial center of the 92-acre mixed-use development project. Special attention was paid to the unusual cooling requirements of the center's computer system. Previously, Mr. Fleming was a Professional Associate and senior project manager for Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. He was responsible for providing technical expertise and direction for all of the fIrm's environmental water pollution-related projects. His responsibilities included permit manager for a Strategic Petroleum Reserve site in Texas, including design direction for conl.min.ted drainage handling; project engineer for a study of utilizing industrial waste for irrigation of highway landscaping, including analyses of soil-vegetative impacts and their effects onmaintenance costs; director of environmental studies for liquid waste disposal for a proposed large petrochemical complex in Rio Grande do Sol, Brazil; and project manager for the upgrading of the world's largest sanitary landfill (Fresh Kills) to obtain state and federal operating permits, including design assistance for transportation improvements to minimize neighborhood impacts associated with current and project truck delivery of solid waste. Mr. Fleming was also project manager for water quality impacts of Westway on the Hudson River and surrounding New York Harbor area waters, and for the design of an industrial park in Pennsylvania, including roads and an environmental management system to control pollutant discharges both during construction and operation. Education Manhattan College, B.S.C.E., 1968; Master of Sanitary Engineering, 1%9. Publications "The Environmental Impact ofPL 92-500 on the Hudson River Estuary, " A. Fleming, et al., Proceedings of the Founh Hudson River Environmental Society Symposium, 1976. 11/93 res I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "River Dynamics and Power Plants," presented at the Hudson River Environmental Society Conference on Land and Water: Resolving Development Conflicts Along the Hudson, May 1978. "Upgrading the World's Largest Landfill," A.F. Fleming, Clearwater. 11/93 res I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NEIL W. ROSS, Consultants Neil W. Ross is an internationally recognized authority on marina and coastal issues and the owner of Neil Ross Consultants located in Kingston, Rhode Island. He has over twenty-fi~~rears experience studying, advising and educating private and government professio about recreation small craft harbors and Marina facilities in thirty-nine states and twelve nations. Internationally recognized as an authority on the marina industry, the US Environmental Protection Agency selected him to conduct special focus group meetings around the nation on toe then proposed CZARA 6219 nonpoint pollution guidance for marinas and boats. He is a key industry advisor to the US Fish & Wildlife Service on the current Clean Vessel Act pumpout grant program. Widely read, his writings have been used as professional guidance on four continents and translated into four languages. Many in government and industry acknowledge him as the leading proponent of modernizing marina facilities, environmental compatibility, public/private partnerships for access for the public to recreational waters. Mr. Ross specializes in: · Environmental Management · Marina Facility Planning & Expansion · Boat Sewage Control & Pumpout Grants · Operations & Management · Floating Wave Attenuation · US Marina Business History & Trends · Coastal Planning for Boating Access · Marina Automobile Parking & Usage Standards · Safety Aspects of Red Tide & Hypothermia · US National Marina Facilities Database · Standardizing Marina Terminology · Building Marina Professionalism Professional Experience Nationwide - President of the National Clean Marina Program of the nonprofit Marine Environmental Education Foundation - a consortium of various environmental, government, academic and trade associations. NEIL W. ROSS, Consultants I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Nationwide - Leader and instructor the 1M! National Marina Environmental Workshop Series, funded by the US EPA Eleven training programs have been held thus far (12794) with two scheduled in early 1995. The seven hour course covers recent Federal environmental guidelines for the stormwater and nonpoint pollution control programs, and the national pumpout grantprogram. International - CoFounder and first President of the International Marina Institute, a nonprofit research, education and clearinghouse on technical information about marinas. (1986-93) . Nationwide - The first marina recreation specialist in nationwide Sea Grant Program at the University of Rhode Island Sea Grant Marine Advisory Service, he helped establish and facilitate extension programs in most coastal states on recreational boating. (1969-86) International Technical Lecturer on four continents (1969-94). Consultant to governments in Indonesia, France, Turkey and Australia. Organizer and director, US National Marina Facility Inventory which telephone interviewed over 8,300 facility representatives in all 50 states. (1985-87) Creator and director of the Advanced Marina Management School at the University of Rhode Island, now at the International Marina Institute. The only professional managers school existing with over 180 graduates. (1985-90) University of Wisconsin Docks & Marinas Conference - Keynote Speaker (annually since 1976). US EPA Region 1, director of New England Coastal Marina Pumpout Station Survey. 1st Executive Director, Rhode Island Marine Trade Association (1972-73) Manager, Rhode Island Boat Show (1973) Chairman at over 15 National & International Marina Conferences (1980-93) Organized training programs in USA and France for over 6,000 marina managers, coastal engineers, boating industry leaders, planners and government officials US Peace Corps - Volunteer Dominican Republic, national campus recruiter, director of small scales fisheries training for Philippines & Papua New Guinea. Education BS, MEd - University of Rhode Island Post ~aduate courses at Southern Illinois University, University of Washington, University of Kentucky, Rhode Island College NEIL W. ROSS, Consultants I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Awards & Recognition International Marina Institute - 1993 Outstanding Achievement University of Wisconsin Dept. Engineering Professional Development - .1992 Distinguished Lecturer New England Marine Advisory Service - 1986 Outstanding Service to Northeast Region Rhode Island Marine Trade Association - 1973 & '86 Outstanding Service to Rhode Island Boating Publications & Presentations The Marina DictionaIy. 1989 International Marina Institute. (2nd edition in progress) The only professional dictionary which standardizes the terminology about boating facilities. Ecology of Marinas & Boating. (with G. Chmura) 1982 University of Rhode Island. The first comprehensive review of environmental impacts; became a national reference. Auto Parkin~ In Marinas. 1989. International Marina Institute. Used as the basis for most state parking standards for boating facilities. Marina Qperations Manual. Editor. 1992 International Marina Institute. The only comprehensive guide for facilities managers; in use in every state and in 10 nations; adopted by US Navy as official manual. Regular articles in professional trade magazines: Boating Industry, Soundings Trade Only, Marina Dock Age, Marina Management International, Authored over 235 technical papers, articles, books & published reports. ProCessional Organizations International Marina Institute, life member, past president, CoFounder Boston Computer Society Save The Bay NEIL W. ROSS, Consultants I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEORGE J. HOSSFELD, JR. Consultant Marine Leasing and Delivery Co. of Delaware 1209 Orange Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 EXPERIENCE Mr. Hossfeld is a Long Island resident and experienced maritime expert with more than 40 years of working knowledge of the maritime indnstry. He has been president and operator of a major shipyard on the north shore of Long Island, JakoDsen's in Oyster Bay. In this position, he served as marina operator and oversaw dredging activities, waterfront facility construction, vessel operation, vessel construction and repair, waterfront facility pfannj.ng, and the review of local Waterfront Revitalization Programs on Long Island's north shore. He is also a highly experienced small-craft sailor, both recre- ational and commercial. EDUCATION Massachusetts Institute of Technology, B.S., Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. 12194 res I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES r: BRIAN J. McMAHON, AICP Senior Associate Professional Experience: Mr. McMahon specializes in the area of community and open space planning. Prior to joining The Saratoga Associates, Mr. McMahon was a Principal Environmental Planner for the Maryland National Capital Parle. and Planning Commission in Silver Spring, Maryland. Mr. McMahon has extensive experience with the application of innovative open space planning programs and has served as conference speaker on open space and farmland preservation techniques on several occasions. Representative Waterfront Planning Projects: · Waterfront Management Plan, Eves Point - The Open Space Institute, New Yorle., NY · Waterfront Management/Sensitive Habitats Management Alternatives AnalysisJPapscanee Island, East Greenbush, NY - The Open Space Institute, New Yorle., NY · Geographic Information System for Waterfront Acquisition Planning - Lake George Basin Land Conservancy/The Nature Conservancy, Lake George, NY · Continuing assignment - Hudson River Valley Greenway Conservancy and Council, Albany,NY · Continuing assignment - The Open Space Institute, New York, NY · Town of Babylon, NY - Master Plan for a waterfront community · Town of Potsdam, NY - Raquene River Corridor Master Plan · Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Syracuse, NY - Land and Recreation Studies along a variety of river systems · Horizons Waterfront Action Plan, Erie County, NY - Waterfront revitalization study Education: B.A. - Environmental Science and Geography, State University of New Yorle., Plattsburgh M.S. - Environmental Science, SUNY, College of Environmental Science and Forestry at Syracuse Special Recognition: Currently serves on Board of Directors for the Saratoga Springs Open Space Project Currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Saratoga County Land Conservancy Served as Special Assistant to the New Yorle. State Governor's Task Force for preparation of a Strategic Plan for the Lake George Basin. Served on the Governor's Environmental Leadership Group, a government and citizen forum created to address environmental policy issues and regulatory development in Maryland. ..- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES c. ~UNGZHANG,MLA Computer Specialist Professional Experience: Ms. Zhang has extensive experience in Geographic Information Systems (ArcInfo - UNIX Version, PC ArcInfo Arc CAD, MapInfo), AutoCADlLandCAD and Image Processing (TIPS), and coordinates projects utilizing these applications. She is proficient in the integration of GIS, CAD and Image Processing technologies in the planning and design process. Her main areas of study have been landscape architecture and geography. Prior to joining The Saratoga Associates, Ms. Zhang was the Manager and Senior Research Assistant for Metropolitan Landscape Planning (METI.AND) Research Group for the Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst She has taught computer applications in landscape planning design using PC ArcInfo, TIPS, Apple Macintosh computers and Microsoft Word, SuperPaint, and Excel. Representative Project Experience: · Town of Babylon, NY - Comprehensive Land Use Plan - GIS Database Development, Analysis & Mapping · Lake George Basin Land Conservancy, NY - GIS Database Development, Analysis & Mapping · NYS Thruway Authority - NYS Canal Inventory - GIS Database Development & Mapping · Town of Keene, NY - Master Plan - GIS Database Development, Analysis & Mapping · Town of Burlington, MA - Master Plan - GIS Database Development, Analysis & Mapping · CCAC, PA - Campus Planning - GIS Database Development, Analysis & Mapping · Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.. NY - Property Inventory - GIS Database Development & Mapping · Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., Salmon River, NY - GIS Analysis · Author: The Integration of Compurer Technology in Historic Preservation and Townscape Enhancement in the Town of Uxbridge, Massachusetts · Researcher: Comprehensive Investigation and Assessment of Water Pollution in Beijing Metropolitan Area · Co-Author: Optimum Condition for Pressure Digestion Technique of Soil and Sediment Samples Used in Environmental Analysis · Research Assistant for Beijing Municipal Research Institute of Environmental Protection, Beijing, P.R China · Adjunct Lecturer, CADD in Site Planning - Dept of Planning and Geog. SUNY Albany Education: Master of Landscape Architecture - University of Massachusetts, Amherst Master of Science - Geography - University of Massachusetts, Amherst Bachelor of Science - Geography - Beijing University, Beijing, China Zhq I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES (; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) PROJECTS . Lake George Basin Land Conservancy, Lake George, New York - Needs assessment, data collection and development of a land trust's conservation strategy. Products included a multi-tier conservation strategy and a three-dimensional digital terrain model. . New York State Canal System Inventory, New York - GIS for 524-mile water corridor linking canal systems throughout New York State. Approximately 6,000 individual parcels will be inventoried and analyzed as the fIrst phase toward a comprehensive master plan to develop and preserve recreational, economic, and cultural resources. . Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Syracuse, New York - Evaluation of alternative mixes of land uses using economic and environmental management, environmental preservation and recreation enhancement program for NMPC holdings throughout New York State. Plan is focusing on the analysis of highest and best use of 90,000+ acres of non-operating utility company property for over 20 site projects along the Hudson River, Raquette River, Black River and Salmon River. Currently providing database management for entire holdings. . Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Lake Luzeme Property, New York - GIS mapping and overlay analysis of NMPC Lake Luzerne property. Site development opportunities and constraints analyzed to select site conservation and development zones. Coordinated with Forestry Department Timber Management Plan and data. . Town of Keene, New York - First Adirondack Park town to prepare complete Geographic Information System (G.I.S.) using Arc-Info for community master planning and natural resources management. Coordinated with existing Arc-Info databases from Adirondack Park Agency (AP A) and NYS Department of Equalization and Assessment for project use. . Town of Stuyvesant, New York - Development of a parcel-based GIS inventory for analysis of agricultural preservation, waterfront protection and tourism development. Funded by the Hudson River Valley Greenway Council as a model cities project. . Town of Jamestown, New York - Completion of a GIS inventory for examining alternative economic development strategies. . Town of Burlington, Massachusetts Master Plan - Community master plan including data collection, public participation surveys, scheduling and coordinating public meetings, land use plan, and development of Town goals and policies. GIS will be utilized for this project, coordinating with Massachusetts GIS. . Town of Babylon, New York - Coordination and management of Master Plan using ArcInfo, GIS system for purposes of townwide planning with special emphasis on use of GIS for demographic analysis. . Horizons Waterfront Commission, Inc., Waterfront Action Plan, Erie County, New York- Coordinated digital mapping and analysis of natural and manmade attributes for comprehensive planning of 90-mile study corridor along Lake Erie and the Niagara River. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES 1/ . Sterling Site Task Force, Sterling, New York - Coordinated GIS mapping project, included mapping the property boundaries, topography, and inventory and analysis of over 12 environmental factors for application in highest and best use analysis. . IBM, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown, New York - GIS mapping of property and various environmental data for use in planning and regulatory compliance issues. . OffoCampus Centers, Community College of Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania- Feasibility and need determination of off-campus centers using demographic analysis of area school population and GIS program. . Fulton County Community College, Johnstown, New York - Automated mapping of campus space utilization for master planning and space programming. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES E; WATERFRONTS . Horizons Waterfront Action Plan, Erie County, New York - Preparation of an award- winning strategic land use plan for 90 miles of the Erie County waterfront which identifies and facilitates immediate development projects of both a public and private nature, identi- fies long-term private development and public improvement (e.g., recreational, infrastructure) opportUnities, and provides the policy framework for ongoing management of the shoreline. . Champlain Canal Corridor Development Study, Lake George, New York - Evaluation of the canal system to guide local communities in the development of strategies that utilize the Canal Corridor as a stimulus for increased tourism, recreation and economic development Specific products of the study include: I) identification of historic and other regionally significant sites and areas; 2) public participation; 3) development of goals and objectives; 4) formulation of appropriate proposal development of regional significance and; 5) identification of public and private-sector funding sources. · Master Plan Recommendations for Papscanee Island, East Greenbush, New York - Developed a comprehensive master plan recommendation for the conservation and develop- ment of the town's waterfront. The plan emphasized the preservation of significant tidal habitat along the Hudson River, protection of world-class agricultural soils and creation of an 1 DO-acre waterfront park. . Eve's Point Conservation Plan Saugerties, New York - Unique management plan of large waterfront conservation/recreation area along the Hudson River prepared on behalf of the Open Space Institute and Scenic Hudson, Inc. The plan established the framework for integrated management by the Palisades Interstate Park Commission of state-owned land and property owned by the land trusts. Primary focus of plan was production of visual and open space character. . Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Upper Hudson Parcel Management and APA Permitting - Preparation of a comprehensive land use plan for an 18-mile stretch of the Hudson River between HadleylLake Luzerne to Warrensburg in Saratoga and Warren Counties. The plan included residential use, hamlet commercial and a significant green way along the east side of the river. Comprehensive plan submitted and approved by the Adirondack Park Agency allowed sale of residential parcels to lessees as well as implementation of the Greenway concept. *The plan received two awards: The Adirondack Centennial Awardfor Business and from the Adirondack Council. . Orchard Beach, Pelham Bay Park, Bronx, New York - Master plan for development of high-use waterfront recreation area, including consideration of both passive and active water related activities. . Potsdam Riverfront, PotsOOm, New York - Riverfront and corridor action plan including the exploration of the enhancement, development and recreational/environmental protection and potential of the Raquette River. This project resulted in the preservation of Potsdam's riverfront resources, while creating new projects for the central business district. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES L . Hamlet of North Creek, New York - Creation of a Downtown Revitalization plan which includes a Hudson Riverfront park and cultural area, walking trails and incentives for business development. · Oswego Harborfront, Oswego, New York - Conceptual development plan for tourism and recreational development potential of the harbor area including linkage to the downtown business district on Lake Ontario. · Waterfront Studies - Rensselaer Coastal Zone, Greenport Coastal Zone, Rochester Canal Zone, North Greenbush Coastal Zone, Buffalo Waterfront, Waterford Canal. · Development Feasibility Study, Breneman Site, Oswego, New York. Feasibility study of five-acre site and a 150,000 s.f. mill complex to determine best use, includiing site analysis, market survey, financial feasibility, and preparation of the RFP to developers. · Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation - Hydroelectric Relicensing/River Systems Analysis. Analysis of land use recreation and environmental enhancement components for Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) relicensing application (Exhibit E) associated with several hydroelectric facilities on six river systems. Evaluation of alternative mixes of land uses using economic and environmental criteria to assist in developing a multi-objective land management, environmental preservation and recreational enhancement program. · Chalmers Building Development Plan and Strategy, Amsterdam, New York - Feasibility Study for Montgomery County Economic Development Corporation to explore the possible uses of the former Chalmers Knitting Mill, a 300,000 s.f. vacant building zoned as light industrial and incorporated into the neighborhood character. · Sterling Site, Lake Ontario, New York - Feasibility study for 2,800-acre parcel owned by Rochester Gas & Electric (RG&E) on Lake Ontario's shoreline known as Sterling Site. The study incorporates a development plan and strategy to include mixed use, shoreline recreation, conservation areas and infrastructure improvements. The scope includes market feasibility and economic evaluation, physical planning, environmental planning and regulatory processing. · Moreau Industrial Park, South Glens Falls, New York - Working with the Saratoga Economic Development Corporation and Niagara Mohawk Corporation, The Saratoga Associates are providing a master plan and design of a 265-acre industrial park along the Hudson River. Development of the park could create 4,900 new jobs and tremendous economic opportunity for the area. · Hudson River Greenway Inventory, Hudson River Greenway Council, Albany, New York- Completion of a management study for the council's geographic information system data base for the Hudson River Valley. Emphasis on creating opportunities for integration with local and county planning programs. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES l:l . New York Stille Ca1UlI Inventory, New York Stilte Thruway - Preparation of a comprehensive inventory of land and structures along the 524-mile New York State canal system. Services include inventory development and suppotting GIS and data input, data conversion, photogrammeoic interpretation and field reconnaissance services. · Buffalo Waterfront, Erie County, New York - TSA assisted the ECIDA in the site develop- ment of indusoial sites throughout Erie County to encourage local businesses to maintain their current operation as well as to assist them in expansion programs to provide more job opportunities. The process provided for a site analysis and understanding of the program needs of the industry, an environmental assessment of the potential impacts associated with any expansion program, and plans for the ultimate development of the expansion. The program was intended to review a variety of sites including the inner-city urban locations and the waterfront sites. · Harborfront, Lackawanna, New York - Award-winning comprehensive redevelopment plans and strategy for the 1350-acre, former Bethlehem Steel heavy indusoial site on Lake Erie. The master plan included environmental, indusoial and recreational land use components. wrR-LP ------------------- TOWN OF BURLINGTON ._.:'A~TE~P~~ ("'. ,.... NEW YORK STATE \ CANALS INVENTORY' ., .-----. 1-----------.---. .}.. <"-~ -----.-\. I '. \_..J\ \ i '\ /"'\."-,,.1 \.' ... 'A. t , l> ~:") / '. / ' / ............. \ _._./"t....~~. " , {.",,_..-.J /'/ .. ~, ,. i I "~/' . " l?......_.~ TOWN OF BABYLON " COMPREHENSIVE " LAND USE PLAN > / GIS Projects The Saratoga . 1994 Index A~~ocia te~ - New York - Massachusetts - Pennsylvania "..' ...... "..' i i i j i i j j j i i . ------.-.___._. J/'..........' _.-._.-._._.-._..-._._.~ ~ CCAC CAMPUS PLANNING TOWN OF KEENE MASTER PLAN LAKE GEORGE BASIN LAND CONSERVANCy - - - - - - - - - - - , I , \ SARATOGA COUNTIL .- -- --.- /- / , " ,/ \ \ \ \ \ \ i \ \ I \ \ \ \ : \ \ , \ \, Scl:n:NECfADY CQUNTY \ . ". , 'I -.....-.-., .-..--.-- \ \ ! '. "~" " ...." " '-, '~. , .... 't, ........\ ..rl.._ \ \ " \. ._~~" -......,..1 - - - - - - - - J t. i I /1 , \ 1....-'" '. ")-" \ I I .' \ ..l<i,-./" \ f., \ ~(\"' ..' " / I '-._-~./ ; I ! \ i ! i , '. -;, -1' V 1.,- \ "".~-. ---...,.. / RENSSElIjER COUNTY! , ! i i / , . .:-/ ' ,,~.., (~' I "q \,.J., I, r~~"Ri1-':. '\\[ '(1 --, II' <"h J '- .- \ I.,! ",. Ai.MNy COUNTY i '.> ;.:~. '\~"'''\,..:,. ',' ...... - ri1 TOUIUSl\I RESOURCt:S A --- NYS CANAlS INVENTORY PROJECf , !aJklt:4I,llOO ~.' =- __ _ _.rat \.][7 ti::~=r.::.":.==..~"":".:: ==";:.~'::;:...'";:.:-..::r."Z.:..o":..."'" _..._......_~_. NOlO York s.... TIuuwa)- _Ibod.,. 2OO!IoulNrn ............,.. NY 12:lDI --- - ""-- o _"'k --- -- ~- ~- '==-E'::.t:."!:S...;::;"'!::' :;;:::.':.=r.~--j; __ -- --..- - ------- - ...f"'; .......~:~ r.; /WAIERvLon>-' TJO\' .__.......-..-......r-. i ; ,- "MIl-_ ....- .......- -- ,,-- Na....yu... N~u.. -- n ~.""'..""""'..n , .. . ' w:";' It' -.-u.. I!I....- 0_- , (It,'wt..M_ 0- o_w...r~ y-- . .......... . ....- -~ I I ..,.,..., !~ \ CHAMPlAIN CANAL ~CORRIDOR STUDY I The Saratoga Associales MASTER PLAN I tla::I=lIIIor '''~ -.. Tlo:I.&rO""'....L.Mo:..... -.......- I I I GLENS FALLS FEEDER CANAL CORRIDOR . HUDSON RIVER OVERLOOK . HA VlLAND'S COVE PARK . UME KILN STATION . MAlN STREET COMMERCIAL AREA AND THE BOAT BASIN . PEARL STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT AND CULTURAL AREA . SA WMlLL GREENWAY AND LOCK 12 . FIVE COMBINES. RESTORED LOCK AND CANALBOAT RIDE . BOND CREEK BOAT BASIN . TRAIL UNKAGE I I I I GLENS FALLS - ADIRONDACK GATEWAY I CENTRAL CITY . CANAL I RIVER WATERFRONT REVITAUZATlON . MIXED. USE DEVELOPMENT AND DOWNTOWN CONNECTION . ENTERT AINME~'T - THEATER . COMMERCIAL (FOOD. SHOPS. ACCOMMODATIONS) . RESIDENTIAL . POTENTIAL VISITORS' ~'TER I I I T_"'~ I ,~ I I I .............. I Figure 18. TO 1CRlMa\'lU.E, AUANY, NEW YOU aT\' '!1.AIL.TOfIOLl..OVt,'MAu.:ft1U!ET SI<JIrIIISBOROUl:;DRIVE WHITEHALL. LAKElNORTHERN GATEWAY . URBAN CULTURAL PARK . HARBOR I BOAT LA UNCH . EDUCATIONAL I HISTORIC THEME . EXPAND LODGING AND SERVICES . HOSPITALITY LOCK (12) MUL TI.USE, FOUR SEASON CANAL CORRIDOR. CONNECT WITH FEEDER CANAL TRAIL. SEGMENTS AS MARKED . BOATING . BIKING . WALKING I HIKING . SNOWMOBILING (AS NOTED) , . HORSEBACK RIDING . AUTO ROUTE . CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING . IN.UNE SKATING .- T_",,~ T__Ngto n.... "':;L1i..Jil.GH. Il;.iRW..vrOl\. "'O~ill.[.AL PROPOSED CAMPING AREA ; FORT ANN. MIDWAY POINT . PROVIDE ANCHORAGE SITE . CONNEcrJON TO VILLAGE CENTER .. ct ....:.a "- ~ . o . -.... " . HUDSON FALLS . FE"cDER CANAL CORRIDOR . CANAL-SIDE COMMERCIAL I RECREATION ENHANCEMENTS .... ~ .f .. f.... .---../ T_.._ BLUE HERON NESTING SITES. ENVIRONMEI'<'T ALLY SENSmVE AREA , \ FORT EDWARD. RlVERlSOUTHERN GATEWAY . YACHT BASIN AND PARK . ROGERS ISLAND . OLD FORT HISTORIC THEME . OLD CHAMPLAIN CANAL TRAIL . AQUEDUCT PARK . HOSPITALITY :~_(7l;:;" - -- ... . CANAl.. OWN!D LAND """"'...,.... ..... _.,,c..... ~ ""'_" -:~~':<D - 'TUZL POt.LDt.'S CANA,L. nun ~I:...um -- ~ ''''''~- .- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Cultural Resoun::es ,: l-' i~').( ~~~':-- UbaI7~,,"~ ~"Ilumma-Jf 1t ~ Lc> / ~ -~J <~ i _^ I....!J cr- 1 /~~-rr .- ,,'/ '\.! I~.:.--..... .',' ,,/'; FortAlm~~~ ~ """ , ~ /i~~ Hyde / l """"':'-=.\ ~~i? ='.2\ \ .~ fl,! - ~\'A! ,~/ /7/:', i _F"""_~ _-4-~'-2~~:-:i-E,0;//;- y Fcrt5J.rmfmeUbntry -''-:.:::.: ~ _~.r'" ~Ccun:yRis:mic:a! ~~ .~-.:/'r- s.Qay G.l=Fclb...,- r"': ~_ " Fz-! . :'//~.' FcrtEtl..mArtClrnfeor ""_" Bw=l~..sy; - _:'~OJdFaa~1liJRNnD /"-J V , / ~~ ..iy .. . . NORJH llbtmn CUltural_ CUfturaI Fscili1ics A GIS system may be used to analyze many types of data. The ARCI\"FO system allows data to be layered and compared with other information, with all layers accurately located. These examples show how various factOrs influencing the corridor plan were smdied and compared to projects currently planned. CHAMPLAIN CANAL CORRIDOR Pipeline Projects / Proposa1deYr!lapm::Dtof --z-- _ ' / Cootc'slsJandtar~ j;.~ 7::::-V:"'!:miI mrdmvtn:mmcntal~ ,...,.-.. __ _'\.~.- '~oI1Ddc12~/ ;:-.'~ brlttJe ~/~ Rrdevr:'JcptDC!I1lattilflk '1_. tom :--_,~ r~ ',,,: i. -,,) '--../t/:>--Pt::r:z.ibkillmS"tar Z'~ BIJdn:1fmg ,/ -~ -----~:::; 7i['irrtoW.trn.'JJCow7fy~ b/J(e'W<JY / Enh.mcro H;;JviJand's-: f' COVI"PiUtr I ...,...J ~Dam\.qltt:- ~~-r':t j =--<:-;..J. I i. '\e " i-- " "Jj GII::::>.,l:b ~-"--Ma'f'Stm"tCcimml:'rci.JIA.rtIJ .' __, -- v ilndM.lnmdd1cf>~ ~,~..,,/ ',',;-.. \. -- . - ,d::t:/ -'7.-- -.-~ PcJrtSt1f'ctHisroncDctrict :~-~_ /" - - c-- 5awmiIJGrecnw.:ly;Lock1Z ,- !~., 'J~BondC:n'cl<EJaar.BJsiD ;.. FM'CombincsPa:rklIIld :~, LD:;Jr;1lTStOr.ztIon ;.'~~ &p.mdlcnham:e yadrtBasin Part i ~"'~Dcvt'/opmcntofdighea~tmd ;~;::.- --::- CLItwr.lI~,I.'nID'" r-- ,,; ShmnanttlWll'- i, "')(,,-- Lrd 7 frrfomntion Ccnrcr....tthfie.lntD P.1f1r !" GGFT Bu;.; S}'2m /"--PrtviIrclYdevr!1opcdlTJJJinapmpcsed ; \ ~ forthesoathmltJpofRf:Jg(n.lsIand 'if , '&ORTH Proposed projects Figure 5. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~C ~~ wffi l?Cf) ~z 00 15u ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ B l=Q ~ .p::; ~ b~ :>> 1nu S~ SO ~~ /., ~ ~ > ~ z ~ !il c.:l 25 I il :$ J l~ · E) QI ~ ~ '-",.-...-.. ~~-~~'l "f~-""--' "_"'-,~ l..........."'... ...-"...... ...--"- ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TOWN OF KEENE, NY Development of the town master plan and site plan review guidelines. Specific design guidelines were developed for four common scenic landscape themes present within the town, including hamlets and historic gateways, steep slopes and ridgelines, highway corridors and upland areas. Master Plan Community Character Guidelines THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I i I I I OVERLAY OF CONSERVATION & DEVELOP:MENT FACTORS . High Conservation . Moderate Conservation . High Development . Moderate Development . High Conservation & High Development ~ High Conservation & Moderate Development Wl Moderate Conservation & High Development o Moderate Conservation & Moderate Development o Low Conservation or Low Development WJ Private land Boundary (Total 29618 Acres) t l' . 0" II ~- - \:-"', I ' \ k =. ~...r'---....., ....._ \.'---fJ..." ~ "~~- y.// /- . . . ' . . . OVElLAY fACTOiS HI GH CONSUVATION WOOEIATE CONSERVATION HIGB DEVELOPMENT WODUATI DEVnOPIlENT m GH CONS. " HI GH DEV. m GB CONS. l 1I0D. DEV. 1100. CONS. " HI GH DEV. WOO. CONS. "WOO. DEV. LOW VALUIS . . . , , " ,;=. - . .- -. ...-.'P : ~,.,,- ~~ ,'- - . \ \" ~ 9 I-:'1 ._ /~~,.j ""v-~ r' '. ./ dO -- , / / . . . . . ACREAGE PElCENTAGE 01 PUVATI LAND TOWN OF KEENE MASTER PIAN ESSEX COIJNI'Y, NEW lOIIIC The SmIop ........- . 1030.04 2547.95 4201.44 1102.49 1054. " 511.14 541.13 724.10 10057.21 4.13 1.10 14.21 2 0.10 3.51 1.15 I. 13 2.45 33. Ii - - - , -- ~ lofl c..riIlI.IJ................... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ANALYSIS 1 TOWN OF BABYLON COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN DEMOGfW>HICS PLANNING LECEND: ANAl. YSIS 1 mI CIll'l!RlO IJ Median .. YOU"fl!" TnIn l2J VIm bl MKI.. Ho&.Wlold trmrnr. '- 1llan $CU11llll cl_.""_Id: _1llan:U DCIll'l!RlO I)~an. Older Tnan !2.! __ b} Mldiln Halalhald lna:lmI: ..... 1llan S42,S11llll cl_.""_1d: '-_:u Iii OTHEIS ~( l _", l",,", t.'i. ~ ~~ ~=:s [) ~~ "&;"",j'~ {\-,' ' I, _"'_ .-' d~ I .<. "'''''''':>:-.) ~ - '''')'::0--_ t ~ " "",!''''j!::; -' -... l~ ""-...,~'r:~;;;;.;;::-;;'. ...... fC~~ \ "'-~~I ( I... '_'_ .~::::7- ->-.~... \)-""'" ...______ I rt>f... /.It- ,....... 1:\ "<I-~:'- \ ~ \ -, ~ -..;,' '. ., I'~O_~S. ~ .___~;' '. ''''''1' ...r-::-._' of/ ___-:.. " J ~,,-...! .-'.....~-..;K / ""11 -....' ~,.,,~. .~~' t=::i', "',' ~~. 6'..-""'":"__- _ ,.t,' . (,i,;.-~,'-' ..-~'_,:, .--' _... -___ rt ~.. .rl /'... ", '."..."# ..... i 1r.r- ,...):.~.--- . --' I ~........... ......./ V" ...... , ....... , ~..... L......... TOWN OF BABYLON. NY The Town of Babylon, located on Long Island. is a built-out community with a 2OO.000z population. TSA is developing a GIS-based community comprehensive land use plan focused on social. demographic. economic and physical factors. A major component of the plan is the rewrite of Development Guidelines and the Zoning Ordinance. Also included is data collection. planning surveys. scheduling and coordinating public meetings. SEQRA issues and development ofEAF-EIS. Comprehensive Master Plan Downtown Revitalization Plan SEQRA Compliance Zoning Revisions Design Guidelines THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES . I I MEDI"N HOLJSEhOLD INCOME I I ......,...... ..-10...... .......ID__ liiI.-.-m..... O....'la__ 1iI___...... I I I POPUL"TION P:R HOUSEHOLD I .... 0...,.. Su.u .-.. I I ~. 1f-.' (,;."t:f.J~.~ J-~4 w '.,)a~~~ .L: ~~-. L:::::l . ~-- ...-...... "'.-- I I IV\CE I :THNIC GROUP ANALYSIS I I I 0_......' -.oc _ 8'MC1t)>_... ....\1:.._101 .110:_11I. "'''lC C I" .-.a_..... -.0__ .~.-... --...... _c_ D.....:.. .... MaCe...' _eM I I HOUSEHOLD VALUES PER aNSUS TIV\CT, 1989 --.... 11_- ....~... . "" to..... CII.....lO__ 8....'10__ .mrIl.......__ ~ORm. WORKERS: 11_ ........- 0_ --- I """ '~"~~~'1~ C? "'W'-:--- ' .~-;;".-~. ..___.rf (.,..;.-"-_.. -.~ -:..--' TOWN OF BABYLON, NY Geographic Information System As part of the planning commission, a compre- hensive GIS system was developed for the town. While this GIS was extremely valuable during the planning process, it was conceived and constrUcted as a long-term management tool for Town government. I THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES . I ------------------- Site Name:' Deer Park TOWN OF BABYLON COMPREHENSIVE lAND USE PIAN LAND USE 1992 LEGEND: . Asrieultural [J Residenllal fJ Vacant . Commercial f:J Recreation II Community Service . Industrial In Pub!;'; Service ITI Wild Land and Park il~U~ Ma;-.---- w::tV) [I I.._~_._~---- SOLE 1 : 6.000 ~ -~~..--~-...-'-.~,.cioo FT. :,~ The Saratoga "'sodares . Greenrnan-Pedersen, Inc. I I I I C. IIDDU!SEX 1lJlItRC! - AREA " IIEllEARCH AIID Il!VB.CIPIlENI" CAMPUS CORRIDOR. CREATE INTERNAL SPINE ROAD SYSTEM U. NEIGHBORHOODS .. MAlNTAfN AND IMPROVE PUBUC SPACES AND AMENmeS L GREENWAY, OPEN SPACE ANt RESOURCE PROTECT1ON TRAILS WHERE APPROPRIATE I A. TOWN CENTER .. ENHANCE COMMUNITY IDEHTlTY AS A PEDESTRlAN-ORIENTED COMMERClAL AND CIVIC CENTER I B. VINE BROOK.. WATER RESOURCE PROTEcnON AND NATURE OBSERYAT10N K.. MILL POND PRESERVE- NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTlON AND PASSIVE OllTDOOR RECREAnON I J. HOUSING OPTIONS I I L WINN STREET NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. ENHANCE APPEARANCENISUAL ""ENIllES I D. SOUTHERN GATEWAY.. HOSPlTAUTY AND SUPPORT USES;CREATE INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS E. 8URUNGTON UAll ROAD.. AREA 12 MAINTAIN PR!II1ER COIWERClAL CHARACTER G. TOWN GATEWAY (TYPICAL).. WELCOUING LANDSCAPE TREATMENT AND $IQNAGE I .SEE REPORT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION F. WHEELERlBLANCHAAD ROADS- AREA a PLANNED COMMERCLAU INDUSTRIAL REVlTAUZATlON ANn rwnnnnR RPt':RFATION I I TOWN OF BURLINGTON, MA Goals and strategies and comprehensive land use services for the development of a comprehensive plan. A town-wide resident and business survey, and an inventory and build-out analysis using GIS technology led to the development of a plan enhancing town character, economic development and open space preservation. I Comprehensive Land Use Plan Downtown Revitalization Economic Development I I I I THE SARATOGA ASSOCIATES . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I THE SARATOGA ASSOCL~TES l '" ! 111111, '1_' .'"j' "111" .::\'" ", , 1.1\\\""", '.\ \ ,',' 1\11 '"'"' '- \ '~ :', '. \ \\\ \ \"\\ " , \ \, '. '~ it. 'fll, , "" I, 11".,'\1 \ \ i i 1 \ \1 \ ,\ \ \ \ \. I, \ II \ \ \ \ \ \ , ' HORIZONS W AlERFROI'.'T COMMISSION Preparation of a physical land use plan far 90 miles of Erie County shoreline to identify private and public develop- ment improvement projects and provide a policy frame- wotk far ongoing management of the shoreline. A plan Was developed forrecreation, transportation. and develop- ment oppornmities. Waterfront Action Plan. Erie County. New York Also, an Environmental Impact Statcinent (EIS) was prepared. Within the framewotk of an active public participation process, the .' r', timdamental objective was to bridge divergent economic and environmental interests, n:giona1 and local perspec- tives, development and preservation interests into a cohesive waterfront plan. The illustration above is an artist's rendering of the Harbor Development area, which is one of ten Phase I projects to be developed in the overaJ1 plan. Two projects an: now in the design phases. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1993 HONOR AWARDS --- .-- -- -._.~-- --- - + Horizons Waterfront Action Plan Erie County (Buffalo), New York The work recognized here is a truly comprehensive plan for the Lake Erie shoreline that comprises the marching orders for a significant intergovernmen- tal body, the Horizons Waterfront Com- mission, Ine. This entity, a subsidiary of the New York State Urban Development CoIJ'., is itself a major accomplishment The com- munities of Buffalo, Lackawanna, Tona- wanda, Hamburg, Evans and Brant plus Erie County and later Grand Island all joined forces to form the corporation, recognizing Horizons as the lead agency in certain projects, the master planning instrument, coordinator of private invest- ment and as the vehicle for Federal and other assistance. Horizons Waterfront ~1r # ~~ Commission is governed by 16 voting plus 18 non-voting members. The master plan addresses the chal- lenge of how best to convert the consid- erable industrial acreage along the shores of Lake Erie into new and different uses, blending the myriad and sometimes con- flicting aspirations of the different com- munities and interest groups in the area. An additional challenge for the five-firm planning team was to develop year- 'round uses in an area with severe winters. The team has developed an aelion plan and implementation strategy as well as establishing broad goals. Among its sound planning principles are the suggestions that waterfront "aeli,'ity centers" be established for public enjoy- Waterfront Plans ment, that these centers be linked to each other and their communities with a greenway system of parkways and trails, and that both the natural and built environments be celebrated. Presl!rlled 10: Daniel Sitler, principal, Saratoga Associates, Saratoga Springs, N.Y.; Thomas D. Blanchard Jr., presi- dent, Horizons Waterfront Commission, Buffalo, N.Y. I<Sl.t V1EV "AF-t::. (....,""") . .~. 4. / .....' \ .....-..... - \ ?H,l.;! 1 tlMt.orHEl.'T \ ~ f.~~~ ILLUSTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR RIVERFRONT PARK . . JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 8, 1995 Philip C. Sears, Vice President Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. 117 East 29th Street New York, New York 10016 Dear Mr. Sears: Town HaJI. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Inasmuch as we are in receipt of the executed agreements for the Town of Southold Harbor Management Plan and Erosion Management Plan, I am returning herewith your two (2) certified bid checks in the amounts of $2,500.00 and $4,500.00. Very truly yours, ~~ Judith T. Terry . Southold Town Clerk Enclosures . . Allee Iqng Rosen & Fleming, me. Environmental and Planning Consultants 117 East 29th Street. New York. NY 10016 . 212/696-G670 FAX Number 212/213.3191 March 7, 1995 Ms. Ruth D. Oliva Deputy Supervisor Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Contracts for the Harbor and Erosion Management Plans Dear Ruth: Please find enclosed signed and notarized copies of the contracts for preparation of the Harbor Management Plan and the Erosion Management Plan for the Town of Southold. It is our understanding that the Town can now return our bid deposit. We had a very productive meeting with Department of State last week, and their input was quite helpful. We are planning on submit the draft plans to you by mid- to late- March. I am in the processes of analyzing the data we have gathered, and plan on being in Southold mid-week, March 13th to complete the data gathering. I will call you a couple of days before I come. We have been told that a meeting with DEC in late March has been arranged to discuss placement of dredged materials. If appropriate, I will attend that meeting. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, INC. Il"Wi- e ~w.~ PhiliP" C. Sears Vice President cc: Steve Ridler, NYS DOS'wlo enclosures Bob White PCS:wp shold-2'.let . . THIS AGREEMENT made this 2nd day of March ,1995, between the TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, a municipality of the State of New York, having its principal office at 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York (the "Town") and ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, INC., having its principal office at 117 East 29th Street, New York, New York (the "Contractor") agree as follows: 1. Performance of the Work. The Contractor shall perform the services for preparation of a draft and final Harbor ManaQement Plan in accordance with the description of those services set forth in the Request for Proposal prepared by the Town of Southold and the Proposal submitted by Contractor and dated December 6, 1994. 2. Compensation. The above described services shall be provided for a fee not to exceed $24,770.00. 3. Commencement and Completion Dates. Contractor shall commence the work immediately and shall diligently and continuously prosecute the work at such date as will allow it to be completed no later than March 31,1995, unless the Town allows an extension. 4. Workers Compensation. Contractor agrees that it has or will secure, for the term of this contract, Workers Compensation coverage as required by law. 5. Non-Collusive Bid. Contractor certifies that its bid has been arrived at by the Contractor independently and has been submitted without collusion with any other vendor of materials, supplies or equipment of the type described in the invitation for bids, and the contents of this bid have not been communicated by the Contractor nor, to its best knowledge and belief, by any of its employees or agents, to any person not an employee or agent of . . the Contractor or its surety on any bond furnished herewith prior to the official opening of the bid. i. 6. Contractor's Representations. Contractor makes the following warranties and representations: A. Contractor warrants that Contractor shall comply with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances or regulations applicable to all of the services to be performed by Contractor. B. Contractor represents that the information furnished by Contractor with the bid is accurate and complete and Contractor acknowledges that Town has relied upon the accuracy and completeness of that information in the selection of Contractor as the lowest responsible bidder. C. The Contractor represents that Contractor shall utilize its best effQrts to insure that Minority and Women Owned Businesses (MBE's and WBE's) have the opportunity to participate as subcontractors under this Agreement. In the event the contractor subcontracts twenty-five percent (25%) or more of its work hereunder, Contractor shall submit to the town an MBE and a WBE Utilization Plan, prior to execution of this Agreement. 7. Quality. Contractor agrees to provide, perform and complete all of the foregoing in a proper and workmanlike manner, consistent with the highest standards of professional and construction practices and in full compliance with, and as required by or pursuant to, this contract, and with the greatest economy, efficiency, and expedition consistent therewith, with only new, undamaged and first quality equipment, materials and supplies. 8. Technical Ability To Perform. Contractor represents and warrants that it is sufficiently experienced and competent, and has the necessary capital, facilities, plant, . . organization, and staff, to provide, perform complete the work in full compliance with, and as required by or pursuant to, this contract. 9. Warranty of Work. Contractor warrants that the work and all of its components shall be free of defects and flaws in design, workmanship and materials and shall be fit, sufficient and suitable for the purpose expressed in the specifications. 10. Contract Price and Payment Schedule. The contract price shall be paid in lump sum payable in two payments: 1) 60% of the fee upon submission of a draft plan; and 2) 40% upon submission of a final plan in a form satisfactory to the Town Board. The Board shall review it within two weeks of submission. Contractor shall provide the Town with documentation of nature and hours of work performed. 11. Prevailing Wage Rates. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of the New York State Labor Law relating to the payment of prevailing wage rates to the extent applicable, or the applicable State Law in the state of disposal. In the event that at any time during performance under the contract the Contractor is required to increase the wages paid to any of its employees as a result of such requirement, all costs resulting there from shall be borne exclusively by Contractor. 12. Insurance and Indemnification. Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Town of Southold against any and all liability, demand, cost or charge which the Town may directly or indirectly suffer as a result of Contractor performing the terms of this agreement. 13. Subcontracts. Contractor shall not enter into any subcontracts in connection with the services to be performed by Contractor hereunder, except for those subcontractors named in the Proposal, without the prior written approval by the Town of such subcontracts. All such 3 . . subcontracts shall make express reference to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and shall obligate the subcontractor to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances or regulations relating to the services to be performed under the subcontract. In the event the subcontractor is required to furnish any insurance or bonds for the benefit of Contractor, the Town shall also be named as an additional insured or obligee. 14. Prevailing Wage Rate. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of the New York State Labor Law relating to the payment of prevailing wage rates to the extent applicable, or the applicable State Law in the state of disposal. In the event that at any time during performance under this Agreement the Contractor is required to increase the wages paid to any of its employees as a result of such requirement, all costs resulting therefrom shall be borne exclusively by Contractor. 15. Independent Contractor. Contractor agrees that it will conduct itself consistent with its status, said status being that of an independent contractor and, Contractor, its employees or agents will neither hold themselves out nor claim to be an officer or employee of the Town of South old nor make claim to any right accruing thereto including, but not limited to, Worker's Compensation, Unemployment Benefits, Social Security or Retirement Membership or credit. 16. Dispute Resolution Procedure. If Contractor disputes or objects to any requirement, direction, instruction, interpretation, determination, or decision of Town, Contractor may notify Town in writing of its dispute or objection and of the amount of any equitable adjustment to the contract price or contract time to which Contractor claims it will be entitled as a result thereof; provided, however, that Contractor shall, nevertheless, proceed without delay to perform the work as required, directed, instructed, interpreted, determined, or 4 . . decided by Town, without regard to such dispute or objection. Unless Contractor so notifies Town within two (2) business days after receipt of such requirement, direction, instruction, interpretation, determination, or decision, Contractor shall be conclusively deemed to have waived all such disputes or objections and all claims based thereon. 17. Contractor's Remedies. If Town fails or refuses to satisfy a final demand made by Contractor pursuant to this contract, or to otherwise resolve the dispute which is the subject of such demand to the satisfaction of Contractor, within ten days following receipt of such demand, then Contractor shall be entitled to pursue such remedies, not inconsistent with the provisions of this contract, as it may have in law or equity. 18. Town's Remedies. If it should appear at any time prior to final payment that Contractor has failed or refused to prosecute, or has delayed in the prosecution of, the work with diligence at a rate that assures completion of the work in full compliance witl'l the requirements of this contract on or before the completion date, or has attempted to assign this contract or Contractor's rights under this contract, either in whole or in part, or has falsely made any representation or warranty in this contract, or has otherwise failed, refused, or delayed to perform or satisfy any other requirement of this contract or has failed to pay its debts as they come due and has failed to cure any such default within five business days after Contractor's receipt of written notice of such default, then Town shall have the right, at its election and without prejudice to any other remedies provided by law or equity, to complete all defective work, have such correction performed at Contractor's expense, terminate the contract without liability for further payments, or pursue such remedies as it may have in law or equity. 5 . . 19. Binding Effect. This contract shall be binding upon Town and Contractor and upon their respective heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives, and permitted successors and assigns. Every reference in this contract to a party shall also be deemed to be a reference to the authorized officers, employees, agents, and representatives of such party. 20. Assignment. Contractor shall not (1) assign this contract in whole or in part, (2) assign any of Contractor's rights or obligations under this contract, or (3) assign any payment due or to become due under this contract without the prior express written approval of Town, which approval may be withheld in the sole and unfettered discretion of Town. Town may assign this contract in whole or in part, or any or all of its rights or obligations under this contract, without the consent of Contractor. 21. Notices. All notices required or permitted to be given under this contract shall be in writing and shall be deemed received by the addressee thereof when delivere€l in person on a business day at the address set forth below or on the third business day after being deposited in any main or branch United States post office, for delivery at the address set forth below by properly addressed, postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. Notices and communications to Town shall be addressed to, and delivered at, the following address: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Thomas Wickham, Supervisor Notices and communications to Contractor shall be addressed to, and delivered at, the following address: 6 . . ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, INC. 117 East 29th Street New York, New York 10016 Attention: Philip C. Sears 22. Governing Laws. This contract and the rights of Town and Contractor under this contract shall be interpreted according to the internal laws of the State of New York. 23. Non-Discrimination Clause. In accordance with Article 15 of the Executive Law and all other State and federal statutory and constitutional non-discrimination provisions, the Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, sex, national origin, age, disability or marital status. 24. Non-Collusive Bidding Requirement. If this contract was awarded based upon the submission of bids, Contractor warrants, under penalty of perjury, that its bid was arrived at independently and without collusion aimed at restricting competition. 25. Default. In the event Contractor fails to perform its obligations under this Agreement or in the event the Town is notified that its state grant funds for this project have been rescinded, the Town may terminate such Agreement. Contractor shall be paid for all expenses incurred prior to notice of termination of the contract, but Town shall not be liable for any expenses incurred thereafter. 26. Severability. The provisions of this contract shall be interpreted when possible to sustain their legality and enforceability as a whole. In the event any provision of this contract shall be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, in whole or in part, neither the validity of the remaining part of such provision, nor the validity of any other provisions of this contract shall, in any way, be affected thereby. 27. Entire Agreement. This contract sets forth the entire agreement of Town and Contractor with respect to the accomplishment of the work and the payment of the contract price therefore, and there are no other understandings or agreements, oral or written, between Town and Contractor with respect to the work and the compensation therefore. 7 . . Nothing in this contract shall be construed to waive or limit any aspect of Town's lawful authority to regulate the activities of Contractor, its subcontractors' or any other person or to regulate the work, the work site or any other matter falling within its lawful regulatory jurisdiction and powers. No review, inspection, test, audit, measurement, order, determination, decision, disapproval, approval, payment for or use or acceptance of the work, or any other act or omission of Town shall imply, create any interest in, be deemed to be the issuance of or require Town to issue any license or permit to Contractor or any subcontractor. 28. Amendments. No modification, addition, deletion, revision, alteration or other change to this contract shall be effective unless and until such change is reduced to writing and executed and delivered by Town and Contractor. 29. Miscellaneous. A. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York. B. Contractor shall not assign, conveyor otherwise transfer its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Town. C. This Agreement, including the Bid Specifications, Bid Form, and all Exhibits attached thereto represent the entire agreement between the Town and Contractor relating to the Services to be performed hereunder. This Agreement may be modified only by written agreement of Contractor and Town. D. To the extent of any inconsistency among the documents constituting the agreement of the parties, the priority among those documents shall be: 1. This Agreement 2. The Request for Proposal 3. The Contractor's Proposal E. If any provision of the Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of the Agreement and this Agreement shall be enforced as if such invalid and unenforceable provision had not been contained herein. 8 . . F. Contractor agrees that it shall not discriminate and that it shall cause there to be no discrimination against any employee who is employed in the work, or against any applicant for such employment, because of race, religion, color, sex, age, marital status, handicap or national origin in any manner prohibited by the laws of the United States or of the State of New York. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. By: Thomas H. Wickham, Supervisor ALLEE KING ROSEN & FLEMING, INC. By: j7 ~ e-~,vZ Philip C. Sears, Vice President STATE OF NEW YORK) ss: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On this 2nddayof March , 1995, before me personally came THOMAS H. WICKHAM, to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at Private Road, Cutchogue, New York, and that he is the Supervisor of the Town of Southold, the Municipal Corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said Town; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such Town seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Town Board of the Town of Southold, and that he signed his name thereto by like order. ~~ o ary Public '~~ C~l(.,r",'::<'~ ';' - "-,' ,:,~V York , 1./ ". ,.:,.....>".', ~ .,:.:..,_,:"."...:'........ :;;1" .. -"r'! '>~" '" _ '_' 1:;...__ 9 . . STATE OF NEW YORK) ss: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On this L day of ~1 WI cl~ , 1995, before me personally came PHILIP C. SEARS, to me known, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he is the Vice President of Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; and that he signed his name thereto by like order. ~~1 ~/~?/l)1~-! ./ Notary Public ... .... SHARON SILVERMAN Notary Public. Sta~e of New York No. 31-t:~,72~B5 Quallfled i:l N8W Yor';< CO'..lnty Term Expires Oct. 1, 199 , 10 /""27-1995 14: 00 .YS DOS CMP AI.&XANDiR ~. TRi:ADWIELI. saCAETAAY 0' STAT. Honomble Thomas H. Wi.cJrham SupetVisor Town of Southold Town Hall S309S Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Supcrvilor Wil'1cham: * STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALeAHY. NY 12231-0001 .8 473 2464 P.02 February 27, 1995 The proposed subconttacts between the Town of Southold and Allee, King, Rosen and Flemin:, Inc. for completion of the Town's Harbor M~~ent Plan and LociI1 Erosion MaDqement Plan have beenxeviewed and found to be in agreement with the tasks of the grant agreements between the NYS Department of State and the Town (Comptroller's Contracts No. COOS627 and COOS628), and are approved putluant to Article I of the agreements. A copy of the executed subcontracts should be returned to me at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions, please contact Kevin Millington at 474-6000. , GRS:sdr y, e R. Stafford Direetor Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront RcviVlIi7~tion ',' ..... . ~ l)Iinl~.~rKYCllId.pape, TOTAL P. 02 . . FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning / Development/ Environment/T ransportation Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David J. Portman, AICP Howard I. Reynolds, PE David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Rye, New York 10580 (914) 967-G,,"0 Michael A. Galante Joanne P. Meder, AICP Jim Donovan, RLA. ASLA December 19, 1994 Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southhold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southhold, New York 11971 RECEIV!D DEe 2 2 1994 rDWn CIerIl lioulI1oId Subject: Harbor Manaaement Plan and Local Erosion Manaaement Plan Dear Ms. Terry: Thank you for sending us Requests For Proposals regarding the preparation of the above captioned plans for the Town. Unfortunately, due to our current workload, we will not be submitting proposals to you for these projects. We wish you the very best of luck with these projects and we look forward to the prospect of being of service to the Town in the future. Very truly yours, (~8 David H. Stolman, AICP Executive Vice President DHS:crc Connecticut. (203) 255-3100 FAX. (914) 967-6615 Long Island' (516) 364-4544 . . RECEIVl!C DEe 1 6 1994 Town Clerll Southnld LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM N~ Decemberl\ 1994 AGENDA 1. Overview of Background and Status of LWRP 2. Down the A. B. Road: The Next Six Months Coastal Erosion Study and Plan Harbor Management Study and Plan ! I , 3. Who? What? When?: A. The Shape and Role of the Advisory Committees B. Coordination with the Consultants C. Deadlines ~~1-~'7-1994 16:09 FROM . TO 8-90~167651823 P.17 ATTACHMENT 3: REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACT MAP PRODUCTS GENERAL MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS The following general canographic requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor: 1) Map Products - The Division's preference is for the delivery of digital map products that meet the specifications outl ined in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section. If analog map products are produced, they must meet specifications outlined in the Digital-Ready Map Product Requirements section. The ability to provide digital map products will be one of the factors used in selecting a Contractor. 2) Deliverable Format - All digital map and attribute table files must be provided in Maplnfo 3.0 for Windows format on 4 mm DA T tape or 3.5" floppy diskette media. Alternatively, the digital products may be provided in UNIX or PC ARC/INFO binary format or AutoCAD DXF format on the same media types upon approval of the Division. All other digital formats require prior approval of the Division. All non-digital map products must be provided on stable base material at a scale agreed upon by the Division. The map products must include an index map to all map sheets and thorough descriptions of all the cartographic elements portrayed on the maps. 3) Documentation -- A data dictionary must be included along with the map files describing file contents. file names. map projection, coordinate system, RMS accuracy, information sources, and creation methodology. 4) Map Accuracy - Unless otherwise stated by the Division, all deliverable map products must conform to National Map Accuracy Standards for horizontal accuracy as established by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). For example, maps at 1:20,000 or smaller, not more than 10% of the weU- defmed map points tested must be more than 1/50 inch (5 mm) out of correct position. At I :24,000, this tolerance translates to a required horizontal accuracy of.4O feet. DIGITAL CARTOGRAPHIC FILE REQUIREMENTS The following canographic construction requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor: 1) Edge-matc:bing - All map sheets must be both visually and coordinate edge-matched with adjacent map sheets. No edge-match toler8l1ce will be allowed. Attributes for splitable features must also be identical. 2) Common Boundaries - All features that share a common boundary, regardless of map layer, must have exactly the same coordinate position of that feature in all common layers. 3) Point Duplication - No duplication of points that occur within a data string is permitted. 4) Connectivity - Where graphic elements visually meet, they must be also digitally meet. All confluences of line and polygon data must be exact; "overshoots", "undershoots". "slivers", or "offshoots" are NOT permitted. 16 GCT-27-1994 16:10 FROM . TO 8-900~67651823 P.18 S) Line Quality - A high quality cartographic appearance must be achieved. Transitions from straight lines to curvilinear elements must be smooth, with angular inflections at the point of intersection. The digital representation must not contain extraneous data at a non visible level. There should be no jags, hooks, or zero length segments. Any lines that are straight, or should be straight, should be digitized using only two points that represent the beginning and ending points of the line. 6) Polygon Closure - For area features being digitized, the last coordinate pair must be exactly (mathematically) equal to the first coordinate pair. No line or polygon must cross itself except to join at an actual confluence. All digitized features across map boundaries must be edited to effect smooth and continuous lines. 7) Graphic Precision - All digital graphic elements must contain positional coordinates significant to one thousandth (.001) of a foot. 8) Digitizer Accuracy - The required RMS error for digitizer accuracy must be .003 or better for digital map registration. DIGITAL-READY MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS The following requirements for non~igital map products must be followed to facilitate the future conversion of the maps to digital map products. 1) Base Map Media - All maps must be created on mylar or other stable base material. 2) Map Scale - All maps of a similar series should be created using the same base scale. Unless otherwise stated by the Division, all maps should be compiled at 1:24,000. If other map scales are approved by the Division, they will conform to standard map scales such as 1:9600; 1:50,000; 1 :75,000; or 1 :100,000. 3) Map Repstration - The maps must provide a minimum of four (4) comer and four (4) interior ticks tied to USGSINYSDOT quadrangle LatILong or NYTM coordinates. The maps must be geometrically correct and should register when overlaid on the appropriate USGSINYSDOT quadrangle control ticks. 4) Map Projection and Datum - The maps must include the map projection and the map datum used. S) Map Title and Legend - The maps must provide a title and legend block describing the information contained on the maps. 6) Cartographic Quality - The quality of all map line work and symbolization must conform to items I - 6 in the map criteria set forth in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section outlined above. 17 U",";I-~(-J.~~.q lb.1I:1 J-k:UM . IU 1;-'M\1', (.167651823 P.19 CONTRACT DATABASE STANDARDS Delivery Media All database and tabular files must be delivered on 4 mm Digital Audio Tape (DAl) or 3.5" diskette. Delivery in another media format must have prior approval of the Division. Software Format All database and tabular files must be provided in Borland's Paradox for Windows version 4.5 format. Other formats that are convertible to Paradox may be used with prior approval of the Division. Geographic Attributes Database and tabular files that contain elements with a geographic reference must provide a corresponding data field and a geographic coordinate pair for each feature location. 18 TOTAL P.19 NOU-01-1994 17:13 FROM . TO 8-90~676S1823 P.04 4. Deliverables A. A draft Local Erosion Manag01Wll Programjor the Town of SoU/hold conJaining the joUowing elO1Wlls: TASK AI: Provide a descriptive analysis of the coastal area and shoreline of the Town of Southold that provides an understanding of the geological setting, coastal processes, land use and flooding and erosion prone areas. NOTE: The presentation of this task should be targeted at increasing the basic understanding of coastal processes for Town officials, staff and local residents. Technical terminology should be clearly explained to enable cOmprehension of the report. Products: A general description of the morphology of the coast. This will cover a description of the geology, landforms, aquifers, wetlands and sediment within the coastal areas of the Town, the location and geomorphology of coastal features such as beaches, dunes, bluffs, iDlets, wetlands. barrier landforms and rocky shorelines and the general conditions that led to their formation, how these features function to abate flooding and erosion, factors affecting their stability and the current natural resource values that they support. A description and analysis of the natural coastal processes affecting the shoreline and the physical forces driving these coastal processes, including wind and wave characteristics, storms, tides,. currents, longshore sediment transport, and sea level rise. A general change analysis of the coast addressing: interaction of processes and natural features reflecting dynamics of the coast storm events and their role in shaping the coast engineering projects and their role in shaping the coast. A discussion of the existing land use patterns of the coastal area. A current land use map, narrative and aerial photographs are available at the Town of Southold. An identification of flooding and erosion prone areas. An overview of the existing regulatory framework for erosion management Map Products: A map of the Town of Southold showing the study area and identifying the 5peCific shoreline reaches that comprise the inventory and analysis. A map or series of maps depicting the shoreline and identifying the morphology of the coast, land use and delineating the flooding and erosion prone areas within the Town. TASK A2: Analysis of hazard areas and development, including characterization of at-risk development and identification of potential for additional development. Products: . For each reach provide a detailed inventory and description of the current shoreline and adjacent 3 NOU-01-1994 17:13 FROM ~ TO ~00779-5167651823 P.05 upland including: coastal morphology coastal processes . flooding and erosion prone areas, including a discussion of the type and intensity of hazards occurring in each reach and an identification of regulatory authority and the location of their boundaries land use and development upland stnlctures in-water/shoreline Stnlctures infrastructure dredging and dredge spoil disposal observations regarding current practices associated with land use and development as they interact with coastal morphology and processes. examples of current practices include structural engineering standards, regulatory standards, site plan and development characteristics. For each reach, provide an analysis of the current shoreline that has resulted from the interaction of the above inventoried items. Use historic maps depicting past shoreline, the historic shoreline maps of Long Island Sound currently being prepared for the Department of State (if available) and past and present aerial photography to compare the current coastal process conditions to historical conditions. The analysis should delineate where the current shoreline configuration is a result of natural processes. It should also indicate where the shoreline configUration has been altered by human interaction and assess the effects of public and private man-made shore' protection StnIctures, dredging and other uses on coastal processes and on the shoreline. I, , Within identified flooding and erosion prone areas provide a characterization of at-risk development and identify the potential for additional development. This should include a discussion of development (type, siting, density, constraints and trends) in the flooding and erosion prone areas and an identification of vacant parcels in these areas suitable for development: Potential development of these vacant pllltels should be presented. based on development trends in these specific areas and within the context of development trends on adjacent lands within the reach. Provide an assessment of the suitability of current rqulations and management practices in flooding and erosion prone areas. Map products: A series of individual reach maps at 1:24,000 identifying as appropriate, coastal processes, the location of the flooding and erosion prone areas identified in Task AI, the detailed location of natural features and development .contained in these areas. TASK A3: Synthesis of reach analysis into townwide flooding and erosion management issues. NOTE: The presentation of this task should be targeted at increasing the basic understanding of coastal processes for Town officials, staff and local residents. Technical terminology should be clearly explained to enable comprehension of the report. 4 NOV-01-1994 17:14 FROM . TO 8-90077~67651823 P.06 Produds: Using information collected in the reach analysis outlined in Task A2, identify common flooding and erosion issues and delineate sections of coast (management units) with common flOoding and erosion mllDagement objectives. Using the LISCMP erosion policy (policy #5) as guidance, identify flooding and erosion management objectives which should be applied to identified management units, consider positive and negative impacts of each objective. Management objectives identified in Policy #5 include: minimize loss of life and structures through the following steps in order of priority: avoidance vegetation soft structUres hard structures protect and restore natural protective features maintenance of public lands navigation infrastructure and management public investment building codes NOTE: This task requires consultation with DOS to apply regional policy to develop flooding and erosion management objectives for the Town. TASK A4: Specific application of the LISCMP erosion policy (Policy #5) to the town,. including the geographic application of standards and the development of specific structural or numeric standards. Products: Identification of specific policy standards from the LISCMP erosion policy (policy #5) to be applied to the management units identified in Task A3. Refined standards specific to the conditions in the Town of Southold reflecting flooding and erosion management objectives for common management units, specific shoreline structures, alongshore variations in coastal conditions, and applicable management measures. Compare standards against local regulations. Identify where current regulations meets standards and where changes are required. Suggest appropriate implementation. NOTE: This task requires consultation with DOS to apply regional policy and develop policy standards for the Town. TASK AS: Define post-storm recovery- plans including recommendations for regulatory coordination, decision making and public investment. Products: Define post-storm redevelopment and development goals for each management unit, consistent with erosion management objectives. Discuss various options for post-storm redevelopment and development and the impacts on future 5 NOU-01-1994 17:14 FROM . TO 8-900779-5167651823 . P.07 hazard mitigation. Develop post-stonn redevelopllleDt and development m:ommendations for each management unit which will take advantage of the post-ltonn environment to accomplish defined management objectives. Provide background to support these m:ommendations. Define procedures for post-storm redevelopment including standards for qualification for emergency permitting and recommendations for a procedure to establish coordinated betWeen Town, State and Federal agencies. Define the areas where emergency public and private property protection is allowable and the methods of protection allowed within each management unit. TASK A6: Opportunities and options for implementing flooding and erosion management. Products: Identify and describe capital projects to implement flooding and erosion management objectives. Provide an indication of cost, funding sources and phasing. Identify areas requiring consultation with the Department of Environmental Conservation to obtain multi-year permits for long-tenn management actions. Provide options on additional resources required to achieve the management goals such as studies; maps, monitoring, coordination with other agencies, taXing districts, and cost share arrangellleDts. ! ~ TASK A7: Identify opportunities to use the {C$u1ts of this study to raise public awareness of flooding and erosion issues. Products: Provide m:ommendations on how the findings of this study can raise public awareness in support of flooding and erosion management objectives in the Town of Southold. Focus on where to avoid development. what structural standards apply and how to accomplish flooding and erosion management objectives. B. A detaU.ed erosion managenrenr plan for shoreline ret1dl #2 etttn4btg from Dude POI'Id Poilll ro. Honon PoinJ. Following the general analysis of this reach completed in the Tasks AI-A7, the consultant should undertake a detailed investigation of reach #2 using available infonnation, including but not limited to maps, air photos, site "inspections, engineering models, and other available sources. In a separate section of the final draft Local Erosion Management Program, a plan should be presented which includes the following infonnation for reach #2: TASK Bl: Examine the available historical maps and air photo infonnation for this reach and identify areas of erosion, accretion and stability prior to 1964, from 1964 to 1974, from 1974 to 1984, and from 1984 to the present with particular emphasis on the impact of shore protection structures. 6 NOV-01-1994 17:15 FROM . TO 8-90077~67651823 P.08 Products: Determine,the approximate rates of erosion and accretion over time. Describe the methodology used to determine the approximate rates of erosion and accretion and assess the accuracy of the calculated rates. This should include a table providing the distance each of these unstable shoreline areas has moved landward or seaward over the specified periods of time and the rate of erosion or tate of accretion for that particular area. Discuss the relative contribution of incident coastal processes to the measured shoreline erosion. Include also the contribution of factors affecting bluff stability in appropriate locations. Map products: Map showing the areas of erosion and areas of accretion based on an examination of historical maps and air photos, and keyed to the table above. TASK B2: Review the shoreline development within this reach. Products: Expanding on the analysis conducted in Task A2, provide a comprehensive presentation of the land use adjacent to the shoreline in this reach, noting developed shoreline parcels which would be seriously impacted by continued shoreline flooding and erosion. Discuss public and private land use practices in the reach which directly influence land stability relative to 'shoreline erosion. A table should be prepared identifying each of the shore protection structures within the reach and providing a general description including the location, age, size, type of construction, ownership of the structure, land ownership, pennit history, and general condition of each structure. TASK 83: Identify the direction of littoral drift, the net volumes of sediment transported in the longshore direction, seasonal and annual variations in the longshore sediment transport where possible, and the sediment sources and sinks. Products: Within the reach as a whole, and within the sub-reaches identified below, discuss the direction of littoral drift and any variations that occur, the sediment sources and the sediment sinks that may exist. Based on the physical shoreline changes identified in Tasks Bl and B2 and calculations based on historical maps and air photos, a table should be included showing the estimated net annual longshore' transport volumes within the reach and sub-reaches over the time intervals identified in Task B 1. . Sub-reaches for the purpose of this analysis include: 1. Duck Pond Point to Goldsmith Inlet 2. Goldsmith Inlet to Bittner Groin 3. Bittner Groin to westernmost Lockman Groin 4. Lockman Groin field 5. Kenny's Beach (easternmost Lockman groin to Kenny Rd) 6. Horton Beach (Kenny Rd to Horton Pt) 7 NOU-01-1994 17:16 FROM. TO 1Iir0779-5167651823 P.09 TASK B4 Using a sediment budget approach, determine the impact of each shore perpendicular structure within this reach on the littoral transpon volumes and the rate of shoreline erosion/accretion. Products: Prepare a simple sediment budget that would examine the sediment sources and sinks and identify the quantities of sediment into and out of the entire reach and each of the sub-reaches identified in Task B3, over each of the time intervals identified in Task BI. Compare sediment transport between each time interval for each sub-reach and the reach as a whole, to determine if measurable impacts are occurring as a result of existing shore protection structures.. Where possible, impacts shoUld be quantified. Compare measurable impacts due to disruption of longshore transport with erosion identified in Task B I. Discuss whether restoring the natural sediment transport would significantly reduce the erosion that is presently occurring in these areas. TASK B5: Assess the condition of the shoreline in the reach with a focus on the beaches adjacent to each of the shore perpendicular and shore parallel structures within the reach. Products: Using the information developed in Tasks BI-B4, assess the condition of the shoreline in the' reach in general and in the sub-reaches. Where feasible, note the impact of each shore perpendicular and shore parallel structure within the reach. Discuss the effects structures in the reach over time and the extent of these effects along the shoreline. Discuss the potential future shoreline condition assuming current management practices continue. TASK B6. Identify the range of methods available for addressing shoreline erosion problems. Products: Using the general reach analysis completed in Tasks A3-A6 and the specific reach information developed in Tasks BI-BS, discuss the various options and combinations of options available to the Town for addressing erosion, including non-structural, soft-structuraI, and hard structural methods, and the positive and negative impacts of each option. Identify appropriate timing for implementation of options. Discuss the effectiveness as an erosion control method, of modifying the existing shore protection structures to restore the natural sediment transport. This discussion should be based on an analysis of potential impacts which would occur in the reach derived from simple model studies and available case histories. Non-structural approaches should identify opportunities available to the Town for relocation, acquisition, regulatory changes, zoning changes, fiscal expenditure changes, and various 8 NOU-01-1994 17:16 FROM . TO 8-90077~67651823 P.10 incentives and disincentives to influence development practices and existing land use. Discussion of appropriate post-storm approaches should be included. TASK B7: Recommend the most suitable method(s) for short and long term management of this section of shoreline. Products: Recommend the best method(s) of managing this section of shoreline and the individual parcels, based on a consideration of the existing conditions and future trends as presented in the general reach analysis and clarified by this specific analysis. If modification of existing shore protection is recommended, explain in detail the type of alteration to be made, estimate the cost to modify the structure, and discuss the positive and negative impacts updrift and downdrift of the remaining structure due to typical coastal conditions and severe storm events. If non-structural alternatives are recommended, explain in detail the procedUl"es which should be followed by the Town for implementation. Estimate the cost(s) for this recommendation. Discuss the positive and negative impacts which would result from this method. . If structural alternatives are recommended, explain in detail the type of construction required, estimate the cost of construction and maintenance, and outline the procedure which the Town should follow for implementation. Discuss the positive and negative impacts which could result from this structural recommendation. c. Five copies of the flnol draft LocoJ. Erosion MarragemenJ Plan including co11lJl1OllS on the draft report provitkd by the Departmot.r of State and the ToWll of Southold, and a 3.S. floppy disk conJoi1ling the report in WordPerfta S.l fomwl. 5. Proposal Requirements Each proposal received will be carefully evaluated for its technical tnerlt. The following items must be addressed in the proposal. Those proposals which most satisfactorily address the folIowing items will be considered in the final selection: A. A work program for performing the Flooding and Erosion Inventory and Analysis based on the performance standards set forth in Section 3, Performance Standards, and provisions for delivering all data products listeiI in Section 4, Deliverables as a minimum. Work program should show the Contractor's ability to provide the necessary products and meet the deadlines for delivery described in Section 4, Del1verables. Work program should also discuss the methodology and specify SOUl"ces of information for performing the Local Erosion Management Program. B. Your firm's ability to perform the required services. Names, titles, qualifications, and relative contribution of all !he individuals who will be providing their services should be given for evaluation. Indicate how their combined qualificationsl assignments enable !hem to competently 9 NOU-01-1994 17:17 FROM . TO 8-900779-5167651823 . P.11 complete the work. Your firm's direct experience in the inventory and analysis of geological conditions, coastal processes and hazard management planning in the coastal environment should be presented, C. Your firm's fee for performing the required services. The funding available for completing this flooding and erosion inventory and analysis and plan development is limited to $45,000. For bids up to this amount, full payment will be made for all services provided. Bids exceeding $45,000 will not be accepted. A list of all the data products in Section 4, Deliverables that could be provided for a charge of $45,000 will be acceptable in the event that available funds are insufficient to complete Section 4 in its entirety. 6. Schedule of Wad<. The following schedule of major milestones and accompanying completion dates shall be maintained in developing the final draft Local Erosion Management Program for the Town of Soutbold. MAJOR MILESTONE: DUE DATE: Issue Request For Proposal ..................................... . 11/94 Pre-proposal meeting. . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11/94 Proposal Due Date ............................................ 11194 Proposal Review and Selection ................................... 11/94 Contract Award Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11/94 Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Work Program andMeeting .......................................... 12194 Public Meeting # 1 ....... _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/94 Progress meeting wlTown & DOS ................................. 01/95 Progress meeting wlTown & DOS ................................. 02195 DraftLocalErosionManagementProgram ......................... _..03195 PublicMeeting#2 ...........................................03195 Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Draft Report . . . . . . . . . . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ _ 03/95 Final Draft Local Erosion Management Program. . . . . . . _ . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03/31/95 10 . . JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFiCER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 16, 1994 Philip C. Sears, Vice President Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc. 117 East 29th Street New York, New York 10016 Dear Mr. Sears: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soulhold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1801 This is to confirm that the Southold Town Board, at a regular meeting held on December 13, 1994, accepted your proposal, at a fee not to exceed $24,770.00, to provide consulting services for a Town of Southold Harbor Management Plan, and your proposal, at a fee not to exceed $44,940.00, to provide consulting services for a Town of Southold Local Erosion Management plan. (Certified resolutions are enclosed.) Your bid deposits on both proposals will be returned upon executed of the agreements with the Town for the aforesaid services. Very truly yours, ~~ Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures . . JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Soulhold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1801 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFF1CER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFF1CER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 16, 1994 Gregory T. Greene Director of Environmental Programs Cashin Associates, P. C. 1200 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Dear Mr. Green: Please be advised that the Southold Town Board, at a regular meeting held on December 13, 1994, accepted the proposal of Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc., at a fee of $24,770.00, to provide consulting services for a Town of Southold Harbor Management Plan. The Board also accepted the of Allee King Rose & Fleming, Inc., at a fee of $44,940.00 to provide consulting services for a Town of Southold Local Erosion Management Plan. Thank you for submitting your proposals on these projects. Very truly yours, ~~ Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk . . JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 13, 1994: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby accepts the proposal of Allee King Rosen & Fleming, Inc., at a fee not to exceed $24,770.00, to provide consulting services for a Town of Southold Harbor Management Plan, and authorize Supervisor Thomas Wickham to execute an agreement for said services, all subject to the receipt of the New York State Grant for the study, and the approval of the Town Attorney. d ~d ~~__ ~hT. Te;;'y' r SouthoId Town Clerk December 14, 1994 . . pg -i7l- GEOFFREY B. STEADMAN Land and Water Resources Planning. Coastal Area Management December 5, 1994 RECEMD DEe 8 19M via Facsimile Transmission and Regular Mail fDIII 0IlIl IDuIIiaIlI Town Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Subiect: "Request for Proposal - Harbor Manaaement Plan" Dear Members of the Town Board: Thank you for inviting me to submit a proposal to develop a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold. I reviewed your "Request for Proposals" very carefully and have significant interest in this type of work. Currently I am serving as consultant for waterfront and harbor management in several Connecticut communities and for the Village of Catskill in New York state. I discussed your RFP with Ocean and Coastal Consultants, Inc. of Trumbull, Connecticut, a firm with extensive computer-aided mapping capabilities. We have worked together on several successful harbor management projects, and our initial thought was to submit a joint proposal for preparing the Southold Harbor Management Plan. We concluded, however, that we would not be able to suitably complete the required scope of work within the desired time period. Our experience leads us to believe that a 12-month schedule would likely be needed to successfully complete work of this extent. Otherwise, it may not be possible for the community to be adequately involved in the formulation of the plan, including the formulation of policies and reco~~endations to address at least some issues that will prove difficult and contentious. We must therefore respectfully decline to submit a proposal for developing a harbor management plan for the Town of Southold. I wish you success in your endeavor. sincerely, , ~stea_n ~ GS:gs 345 NORlH MAIN ST. WESTPORT, CONNECTICUT 06880, TEL.& FAX. 203(226-9383 . . . PROPOSAL . . . Consulting Services Harbor Management Plan . Submitted to: Town of Southold Southold, New York . . December 6, 1994 . . . . Cashin Associates, . P.C. Engineers and Architects Hauppauge, NY. Woodcliff Lake, N.J . Miami, FL December 5, 1994 Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposal for Consulting Services -- Preparation of a Harbor Management Program Dear Ms. Terry: Cashin Associates, P.c. is pleased to submit the enclosed proposal (7 copies) for preparing a Harbor Management Program for the Town of Southold. Our proposal is based on the requirements of the Town as given in the Request for Proposal and as discussed at the pre-submission conference on November 17, 1994. CA has in-house capabilities in the range of environmental, planning, and support resources required to complete the project within schedule. Our prior work on the Town's waterfront revitalization program provides us with a substantial advantage for performing this work. The proposal includes a discussion of our technical work programs, qualifications, project team, and fee proposal. Please note that we have also submitted an Insurance Certificate stating the limits of our professional and general liability insurance and naming the Town of Southold as the Certificate Holder. As Cashin Associates, P.c. is a Professional Corporation in the State of New York, our performance is not covered under bond guarantees, but by professional liability insurance. If required, clients can be named as additional insureds under such policies. Our program will provide for a coordinated effort with the Town, the New York State Department of State, and associated participants to complete the Harbor Management Plan within schedule and budgetary constraints. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal. Very truly yours, CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. ~1~ Gregory T. Greene Director of Environmental Programs GTG/tf 9400-248 Enclosures 1200 Veterans Memorial Highway. Hauppauge. NY 1178B . (516) 348-7800 . FAX (518) 348-7601 '.pERTIFIGAT"F INSURANCE ..i~fAss'I1{tIA .. O~~;;W;~ THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE A4~..ltlt. ~RODUCER ieaman, Ross & Wiener, ,851 Jericho Turnpike ;yosset NY 11791 louglas Schenendorf ;16-921-9100 NSURED Inc. OOMPANY A ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY B FIRE & MARINE ST. PAUL Cashin Associates P.C. 1200 Veterans Mem H~- Ste 200 Hauppauge NY 11788 OOMPANY C MISCELLANEOUS COMPANY D THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLlCV PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDmON OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDmONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ;0 .TR POUCY HUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MM/ODIY'/) DATE (MM/ODIY'/) TYPE OF INSUHANCE B GENERAL UABIUTY X COMMERCIAL GENERAlllABlUTY ClAIMS MADE [!] OCCUR OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT 07/08/95 GENERAl AGGREGATE PAOOUCTS. COMP/op AGG PERSONAl & MJV tNJURY EACH""""""'" FIRE DAMAGE (Any one nre) MED EXP (Any one person) 07/08/94 RP06628461 A AUTOMOBILE UABIUTY X ANYAUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEOOLED AUTOS HIRED AlfI"OS NON-DWNED AUTOS BOQIty INJURY (Per accident) 07/08/94 07/08/95 COMBINED SINGLE UMrr RST212278 BODILY INJURY (Pefperson) PROPERTY DAMAGE S C1ARAOE UABIUTY ANY AUTO AUTO ONLY. EA ACCIDENT OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: EACH ACCIDENT $ AGGREGATE S ~ EXCESS UABIUTY X UMBFELlA FORM OTHER THAN UMBREUA FOAM WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPlOYERS' UABIUTY X STAruTORY UMfTS EACH ACCIDENT DISeASE. POLICY UMIT PlA330543 07/08/95 EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE 07/08/94 A THE PROPRlETOR/ lNCL PARTNERS/EXECUTlVE OFFICERS ARE: EXCL OTHER $ $ DISEASE - EACH EMPlOYEE $ 05/01/94 95PCS326136 05/01/95 ~ C Acct Rec/Val Pap CORIO Umbrella PLA330543 TBA/UMBRELLA 07/08/94 11/23/94 07/08/95 11/23/95 ESCRIPTlON OF OPERATlONSILOCATlONSNEHICLES/SPEClAlITEMS :ERTIFICATE HOLDER INCLUDED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED WITH RESPECTS TO THE JPERATIONS OF CASHIN ASSOCIATES P.C. UMITS $ 5,000.000 $ 5,000.000 $ 5.000,000 $ 5.000,000 $ 5.000,000 $ 5.000 $ $ $ $ 3.000,000 $ 3.000.000 $ $350,000 TOWNOFS SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POUCIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL ~ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERllFICATE HOLDER HAMED TO THE LEn, BUT fAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOllCE SHALl IMPOSE NO OBUOAllOH OR UABIUTY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL 53095 MAIN ROAD P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD NY 11971 OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTAllVES. ,~.QRtl~$;${31$3""'....'."""'" ...............................................................................................................................................i~ii~~~:.i;~R~~;;:ii~~...~.... ....,~$~{(rffj,,~~rl!..tjb . .j.993 ROlllJCHl :EAMAN ROSS & WIENER, INC '0 BOX 468 .851 JERICHO TPKE :YOSSET, NY 1791 .16-921-9100 .~~f!!~~!~~~ERTIFICATE.INSURANCE . . ~~~d~~~:) 'THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MArTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE 'SLIlBJ COMPANY AC.N.A. LETTER COMPANY B LETTER COMPANY C LETTER COMPANY 0 lETTER <XlMPANY E LETTER :ASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C. :ASHIN TECHNICAL SERVICE .200 Veterans Highway :auppauge, NY 11788 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICAtE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAltj, THEINSUAANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO All THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POUvIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID ClAIMS. o. m TYPE <F INSIJRANCE POUCY NlMlEA POLICYe=FECT1VE PClJCV EXPRATION DATE (MWllD/yy) DATE (MM/llD/YY) LNrrs Ga<SW.llAIlLlTY CXlM~W. GENERAL llABU...lTY ClAIMSM.'DE DOC:X::UR CMtIER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT. PROF. LIABILITY ALrTCM:fIlE UABLITY ANY AUTO ,6Ll OWNED AUTOS SOiEDULED AUTOS HlFED NJTOS NQN-CMtlED .-urns GARAGE U.&BlLfTY 3987823 GENEFW. MGfEGATE PRODUCTs-ca.t=l1OPS MG. PERSONAL & NN. lNJl.IRY EACH ooo.mENCE 6-30-94 6-30-95 AFt:: ONMGE (My one fire) $ MED. EXPENSE (hly one person) COMBINED SN3LE $ LNrr 8X)l. y tlJlRf $ (P~ pe<son) 8OOIl.Y NJlRf $ (P~ a<rldenl) PMPERTY ~E $ E1CH oc:a.JFFtENCE $ AGGREGATE $ EXCeSS LWlIUTY l.If.UELLAFOFf.t OTHER THm UM8RELLA FOFt.A ~'SCCM'EftSATDf AM> EMPLOYBlS'lIABUTY EACH ""'DENT DlSEASE-POuey LMtT DISEASE-EACH EMPLOYEE $ $ $ OTHER EiCRPTION CFOPERATtCNiILOCATICJNSI\'EHK1.ESFECIAL rn:MS OUTHOLD, NY 11971 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WIU ENDEAVOR TO MAll30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIACATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHAll IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR llABIUTY OF ANY KINO UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AG NT$ OR RE.~~E~ENTATIVES. .-t-/C:;?, OWN OF SOUTHOLD OWN HALL 3095 MAIN ROAD .0. BOX 1179 . . . PROPOSAL . CONSULTING SERVICES HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN . Submitted To: . Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Southo/d Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 . . Prepared By: . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. Engineers and Architects 1200 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 (516) 348-7600 . Route 22 Brewster, New York 10509 (914) 278-2500 50 Tice Boulevard Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey 07675 (201) 930-1600 601 Brickell Key Drive/Suite 606 Miami, Florida 33131 (305) 579-2006 . December 6, 1994 . . . . TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW . Introductory Statement Overview of Qualifications Project Experience -- Marine and Coastal Studies . Experience of Key Personnel Summary of Work Program . Section 2 PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM Scope of Services Section 3 OUALlFICATlONS AND EXPERIENCE . Overview of Corporate Qualifications Coastal Zone Planning Services Waterfront and Coastal Engineering Experience . Project Experience Waterfront Planning Shorefront and Recreational Site Improvements Client References . Photographs of Relevant Project Experience Section 4 PROIECT TEAM General Personnel Resources . Project Team Project Team Table Resumes of Key Personnel '. Section 5 FEE PROPOSAL . . . . . -@ uw W---Y-, '=::J \ Section One Introduction and Overview . . . . . . . . . . - - - . - -I I , , , .i , ! -t i I I I -I I , I i -! . . . SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW . Introductorv Statement . Cashin Associates, P.c. (CA) has prepared this proposal in response to the Town of Southold's Request for Proposal (RFP) for consulting services to develop a Harbor Management Plan for the Town. CA has reviewed the RFP and attended the pre- submission conference held on November 17, 1994, and we are familiar with the . Town's objectives and requirements for the project. Section 2 of this proposal contains our proposed work program for developing a Harbor Management Plan within the budgetary and schedule constraints identified in the RFP. The development of this . work program is based on our existing knowledge of the Town's coastal zone and management objectives acquired through our earlier work on the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP), as well as our extensive coastal zone . management experience throughout the rl'gion. Overview of Oualifications . CA's Environmental and Planning Division provides specialized services in coastal and marine studies, including the preparation of coastal zone management plans, local . waterfront revitalization plans, harbor management plans and other coastal zone studies. CA has in-house personnel with expertise in the full range of disciplines required for these studies, including marine scientists, planners, environmental scientists, geologists, coastal engineers, transportation planners, economists, and civil . engineers. CA's environmental scientists and planners have or are presently assisting . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW SECTION 1 . . . . municipalities with development of Harbor Management Plans, including the Village of Sag Harbor, Village of Port Jefferson, and the Town of Oyster Bay. They have also assisted in the development of Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs (LWRP's) for a number of major Long Island municipalities, including the Town of Southold. They . have completed numerous specific environmental, engineering, and planning studies related to the coastal zone, erosion and marine resources. . As a part of CA's earlier work on Long Island, we have assisted various municipalities in addressing complex coastal management issues relating to land use, flood protection, erosion control, water quality protection and preservation of marine/coastal resources. CA is well informed of the specific shoreline issues facing East End muni.cipalities, as . well as the great importance of the coast and its resources to the aesthetic, recreational and commercial fabric of the community. Our harbor management work for Oyster Bay, Port Jefferson and Sag harbor has involved analysis and resolution of . conflicting environmental and use issues which are also present in Southold. Because of our prior work in harbor waterfront development plans, CA is familiar with . the sources of information and data required to develop effective management programs. We are familiar with Southold's shoreline areas, its associated land use, development and erosion issues, and the reports and studies available as background . data for this study. Our recent work on the Peconic Estuary Program has already provided us with extensive biological and geological data for much of the Town's harbor and shoreline areas. . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW SECTION 1 . . . Our recent coastal zone experience includes several projects for the New York State . Department of State performed as part of the Governor's Task Force on Erosion Control. These studies included an analysis of hazard management strategies, local governmental arrangements for dealing with coastal flooding issues, and an . environmental review of new inlet formation. Proiect EXDerience -- Marine and Coastal Studies . CA has provided environmental, planning and engineering services for a variety of marine and coastal projects in the region. Representative projects include: . . . . . . Preparation of a Harbor Management Plan and supporting technical studies for the Oyster Bay Harbor, Town of Oyster Bay, New York . Preparation of Harbor Management Plans for the Villages of Port Jefferson and Sag Harbor . . Technical Studies as part of the Peconic Estuary Program, including shoreline surveys and analysis for the entire Peconic shoreline of Southold Town . Preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Plans for the Towns of Southold, Brookhaven, Huntington, and North Hempstead, New York and the Villages of Lloyd Harbor and Sag Harbor; and assistance on LWRPs for the Towns of Islip and Oyster Bay . Biological/Geological Resources Assessment for the Suffolk County Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Comprehensive Dredging Program, Suffolk County, New York, including analysis of beach restoration alternatives . Study of Coastal Erosion and Remedial Actions, including field monitoring of beach profiles, for Stehli/Ransom Beach, Bayville, Town of Oyster Bay . Environmental Assessment and Permit Acquisition for Wading River Channel Improvements and Beach Restoration, Town of Riverhead, New York . Detailed botanical and ecological investigation of valuable coastal wetlands and habitats along the Peconic Bay for the Town of Riverhead, New York CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW SECTION 1 . . . . Analyses of Shellfish and Sediment Data for Oyster Bay Harbor, Town of Oyster Bay, New York . . Environmental and technical studies of the Peconic River system and estuary, Town of Riverhead, New York . Design for Shorefront Bulkhead Reconstruction and Erosion for the Town of Smithtown, New York . . Environmental Inventory and Study of the Barrier Beach and Bay Island Communities, Town of Babylon, New York . Planning and design for remedial measures for erosion, and storm damage to fishing piers and channels at Mt. Sinai, Town of Brookhaven, New York . . Planning and design for repair to storm damage and erosion at Town shoreline facilities for the Town of Brookhaven . EXDerience of Kev Personnel Work on this assignment would be performed by a team of environmental and planning specialists in CA's Environmental Division. Mr. Gregory T. Greene, CA's . Director of Environmental Programs, would serve as Principal-in-Charge. Ms. Wendy Salvati, Senior Planner, serve as Project Manager, and will be responsible for issues relating to shoreline planning and policy development. Mr. John Ellsworth, a Marine . Environmental Scientist experienced in coastal zone management, will serve as Senior Scientist, and will be responsible for data analysis and report preparation. Ms. Laura Schwanof, RLA, an Environmental Scientist formerly affiliated with the U.S. Soil . Conservation Service, will assist on issues relating to erosion, wetlands, ecology and . resource management. Both Ms. Salvati and Ms. Schwanof were primary participants in CA's LWRP work for Southold. Harold Mayer, Esq., Environmental Counsel, will assist in review of existing regulation, at the Federal, State and local levels, and in evaluating administrative and governmental aspects of plan implementation. . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW SECTION 1 . . . . Engineering expertise will be provided by: Mr. John Guidi, PE, LS, Coastal Engineer with extensive experience in Long Island's East End, including various Corps of Engineers' projects; and Mr. James Gladysz, PE, who has been responsible for planning and design of numerous erosion and flood control projects on eastern Long Island. . Mapping will be performed by Ms. Lynn Southard, Graphic Artist and other personnel in CA's in-house CADD and mapping group. . CA has the professional and support staff to commit to this assignment, and to complete it within the required March 31, 1995 timeframe. CA's ability to perform all required services with existing, on-staff personnel will provide a substantial . advantage to effective and efficient completion of the work. Our prior coastal zone work in eastern Suffolk County, and specifically in Southold, will also provide us with a head-start for this assignment. . Summarv of Work Prol!ram . CA has prepared a work program which meets the technical objectives of the Town's RFP, within the given schedule and budgetary constraints. The program will result in the preparation of a Harbor Management Plan which will serve as an integral component of the Town's overall Local Waterfront Revitalization program. The . program will include the development of a working relationship between Town and Department State Officials which will help assure that both Town and State objectives are met. Section 2 of this Proposal contains a discussion of our work plan. Items . listed in the RFP which we feel are not necessary to accomplish as part of this program, given the budgetary and schedule limitations, are identified and discussed. . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C. INTROOUCTION ANO OVERVIEW SECTION 1 . . . . ~ Section Two - ProposeiI--Work Program . . . . . . . . . . . SECTION 2 - PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM . Cashin Associates, P.e. (CA) will provide the required consulting services for the preparation of the Town of South old Harbor Management Plan, which will include a . detailed management program for Mattituck Inlet. This plan will be prepared in accordance with the New York State Department of State (NYSDOS) Guidelines for the Preparation of Harbor Management Plans, as required in the Request For Proposal (RFP) dated November 1, 1994. The following scope is based on our review of the . RFP, the NYSDOS guidelines, and the Town's draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). This proposal is also based on our familiarity with the required work, which we have acquired through extensive prior work experience on . waterfront/coastal zone management and harbor management projects for numerous other Long Island communities (including the preparation of the Town of Southold draft LWRP). . Scope of Services . CA will provide technical support services to the Town of Southold to assist in the preparation of a Harbor Management Plan (HMP) that examines the waterfront and surface waters of the Town, and the activities occurring in these areas. This plan will . contain a detailed management program for Mattituck Inlet. The evaluation of marinas component of this project, as outlined in Attachment 1 of the RFP, would be undertaken by the Town Planning Department as in-kind service assistance, as . overseen by CA. In-kind service assistance from the Town and other designated providers (such as Cornell Cooperative Extension) would also be utilized, where . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM SECTION 2 . . . required, in the collection of data for the inventory of resources for the Town-wide . and Mattituck Inlet portions of the HMP. The HMP will be prepared as a stand-alone document that will supplement the Town's LWRP. This plan will place an emphasis on critical waterside issues specified in the LWRP, particularly those outlined in Policies 2, 4, 7, 9, 19, 21, and 34, among others. The basic tasks of the proposed . HMP are enumerated as follows. A. Harbor Management Area Boundaries . CA, in conjunction with the Town Planning Department, will define the harbor . management area boundaries for the Town at-large and the Mattituck Inlet area. The study area will encompass waterfront upland areas, Town-owned and State- owned underwater lands, and surface waters extending to a distance of 1,500 feet from the mean high water line. CA will also prepare a map illustrating the study . area, which will include delineation of the ten reaches (or sub-areas). B. Inventory of Resources . CA will prepare an inventory of resources. This inventory will document all natural and man-made features and resources found in each of the ten sub-areas that . comprise the harbor management study area, including waterfront and surface water uses and activities. Data for the HMP inventory will be compiled using existing studies (including the LWRP) and other information on file with the Town and various regulatory agencies such as the New York State Department of . Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) or Suffolk County Department of Health . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM SECTION 2 . . . Services (SCDHS). Maps and tables will be prepared to illustrate the existing conditions information presented in the inventory for each of the ten sub-areas. . The information compiled for the HMP inventory will be supplemented through the use of aerial photography and, where necessary, field surveys, and through interviews with government officials and other knowledgeable individuals. . Assistance in the collection of data for the inventory of resources will be provided, where required, by the Town Planning Department and other designated providers of in-kind services. . The inventory of resources will include: land and surface water uses, noting the extent and types of waterfront . development (including water-dependent and associated upland uses), surrounding land uses and municipal jurisdictions, zoning designations, types and extent of vessel activity, underwater land ownership patterns, important . historic and cultural resources, and scenic resources; harbor infrastructure, including the stormwater drainage system, upland . roadways, upland sanitary facilities, local and federal navigation channels, Suffolk County and private dredging sites and dredge spoil disposal areas, docks and bulkheads (outside of marina areas), docks and bulkheads (outside of . marina areas), public water supplies, and other pertinent public facilities (other harbor infrastructure information will be obtained through the marina survey - see item C below); . natural resources, including the location of commercial and recreational . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM SECTION 2 . . . shellfisheries, aquaculture and mariculture areas, shellfish harvest closure areas, . State-designated tidal wetlands, water quality classifications and use standards, existing water quality conditions, State-designated Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats, and Town-designated Critical Environmental Areas; . public access and recreation facilities/resources, such as public parks, swimming areas and bathing beaches, park district facilities, public and private docks, boat . launch facilities, and marinas, vessel mooring and anchorage areas, charter boat services, passenger ferry services, the extent of recreational boating, etc. C. Evaluation of Marinas . Significant data for the inventory of resources will also be derived from the survey and evaluation of local marinas. To assist with the preparation of the Town of . Southold HMP, the inventory and analysis of marinas would be conducted by the Town Planning Department, as an in-kind service for this project. This work would be overseen by CA staff. As specified in the RFP, yacht clubs and private boat . basins within subdivision developments on private and patent lands would also be considered for the purposes of this study. The inventory prepared by the Town will follow the outline contained in Attachment 1 of the RFP and will consider . facility location and land use, site layout, docks and in-water structures, and ecological and cultural resources. This task would be commenced immediately upon the start-up of this project to ensure that the data from this study is available for inclusion in the inventory and analysis. . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM SECTION 2 . . . D. Harbor Management Program for Mattituck Inlet . CA will prepare a detailed harbor management program for Mattituck Inlet. Supplementary maps will be prepared to detail specific aspects of this program. The development of the program would involve expanding the initial resource . inventory information gathered for the Town-wide HMP, and the inventory and analysis prepared for the Mattituck Inlet maritime center discussion, as contained in the Long Island Sound Coastal Management Plan. This task would be . coordinated with the Department of State. E. Review Existing Regulations . CA will review existing regulations at the federal, state and local levels to determine the effectiveness of these laws and determine where revision or the enactment of new legislation may be necessary. . F. Agency Roles and Responsibilities . CA will examine the roles and responsibilities of federal, state and local authorities, as they relate to harbor management considerations in the Town. The involved agencies include the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, . the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers, U.S. Department of Interior, NYSDOS and NYSDEC (among other State agencies), SCDHS and other Suffolk County agencies, certain Town entities (including the Town Board and the . Board of Trustees), the Town Harbormaster and Bay Constables, local police services, etc. . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM SECTION 2 . . . G. Analysis of Issues, Problems, and Opportunities . Based on a detailed analysis of the inventory of resources, CA will describe the important issues, problems, and opportunities that pertain to the Town's harbor management area. Emphasis will be placed on the delineation of issues and . opportunities for the Mattituck Inlet area. The following is a preliminary outline of the potential issues and opportunities that would be addressed in the Town of Southold HMP (amendments and additions to this listing may be indicated after the . inventory of resources has been finalized): water quality degradation problems caused by stormwater runoff, failing septic systems, vessel wastes, etc.; . the need to provide maintenance of faulty on-site cesspool and septic systems in unsewered residential areas; the need to increase the availability of vessel waste pump-out stations at private marinas to serve transient, as well as seasonal, vessels; . the year-round and seasonal closure status of harbor management area waters with respect to shellfish harvesting; conflicts between commercial and recreational boating interests; . conflicts between upland, waterfront uses, including those that may arise from inconsistencies in the zoning code or the need for rezoning of certain properties; conflicts between various surface waters uses, with regard to uses that require a high level of water quality (Le. - shellfish harvesting and swimming) which can be adversely impacted by certain other activities; . the need to protect existing water-dependent uses along the waterfront; identification of areas where new water-dependent uses could be established or where existing water-dependent uses could be revitalized (as a supplement to the information contained in the lWRP); . the degree to which waterfront infrastructure requires upgrading; the need for dredging of navigation channels in Town waters; . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM SECTION 2 . . . potential methods to more effectively allocate vessel mooring and berthing space; and . the potential need to improve or expand public access to the shore and surface water resources. H. Harbor Management Goals and Objectives . . Once the important issues, problems, and opportunities have been defined, CA will prepare a discussion of the Town's overall goals and objectives for harbor management. These goals and objectives will be designed to address the identified issues and problems, and to take advantage of the identified opportunities in a manner that can be reasonably achieved through LWRP policy development, new . or amended local laws, and/or capital improvement projects. For example, it is anticipated that the following goals and objectives would apply (others would be identified when the inventory and analysis have been completed): . improve surface water quality through the initiation of an on-going monitoring program in all Town creeks and other water bodies, the expansion of the Goose Creek adopt-a-creek program, increased public education efforts aimed at boat owners, and the designation of Town waters as No-Discharge Zones; . designate additional areas in the coastal zone as Critical Environmental Areas; develop mooring plans for Town creeks, and expand and coordinate mooring activity in certain embayments; . investigate the feasibility of acquiring the 3.5-acre Marine Bay Club site in New Suffolk (Sub-Area 8) and the Long Island Oyster Farm property (Sub-Area 5) to promote the revitalization of these areas; and renovation/revitalization of the former tank farm, former asphalt plant, and adjoining vacant properties in the Mattituck Inlet area (Sub-Area 1) as less intensive water-dependent uses. . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM SECTION 2 . . . I. Harbor Management Plan Map . CA will also prepare a Harbor Management Plan Map to illustrate the proposed water uses within the harbor management area. This map will be prepared at a . scale sufficient to show the necessary information, such as the HMP boundaries, harbor use zones and any designated special use areas, mooring areas, navigation channels, sensitive habitat areas, designated shellfishing areas, upland waterfront uses, shoreline structures, waterfront infrastructure, and proposed public . improvement projects. J. Techniques for Implementation . In order to make the HMP Map a working plan for the Town, CA would formulate appropriate techniques for implementation. These techniques include amendments . to existing laws, such as the zoning or wetlands laws, and/or the adoption of new laws, such as a sediment and erosion control ordinance. . K. Procedural Actions CA will also develop a discussion of procedural actions that are necessary to . implement the HMP and associated map. This will involve establishing specific recommendations for the preparation of studies to address problems in specific harbor areas and along the shorefront, and/or physical projects to construct or improve shoreline structures or facilities. . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM SECTION 2 . . . . As with the recommendations for the adoption or amendment of laws and regulation, the recommendations for procedural actions would be based on the findings of CA's examination of the inventory of resources and the analysis of the . issues, problems, and opportunities, as outlined above. This examination and analysis will also lead to a determination of whether other State or Federal actions will be necessary to implement the HMP. . CA will undertake the aforementioned actions in an effort to prepare a Harbor Management Plan and associated HMP map, and a Harbor Management Program for Mattituck Inlet, that are suitable supplements to the Town of Southold draft . LWRP, and which meet the specific requirements of the Secretary of State with regard to the preparation of such documents. The HMP will provide sufficient detail to enable the Town of Southold to undertake further actions that will be . necessary to implement the plan, including information required to draft new laws and amendments to existing legislation. . L. Meetings . CA will attend two public meetings for the purpose of gathering public input and presenting the draft plan to the public. It is anticipated that a number of informal meetings with Town representatives will also be required during the course of CA's work on the project to obtain information needed for the HMP. All such information gathering meetings necessary to complete this plan are included in this . proposal. Meetings with the Town Waterfront Advisory Committee, outside . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM SECTION 2 . . . . parties, and/or community groups will be handled by the Town and the information generated at these meetings will be forwarded to CA. M. Submissions and Schedule . By March 1, 1995, in accordance with the specifications of the RFP, CA will submit a preliminary draft copy of the HMP (prepared using WordPerfect 5.1) for review . and comment by the Town and NYSDOS. Five preliminary draft copies of the report would be provided to the Town for review. The Town and State shall each provide one consolidated set of comments to CA for responsive action. . Based on the comments on the preliminary draft HMP received from the Town and State, and during the public meeting held in March of 1995, CA will prepare a final draft HMP. This final draft will include the comments generated from the review . of the preliminary draft report. The scheduled delivery of the final document will be March 31, 1995, at which time five copies of the final draft HMP, the associated HMP map, and a 3.5-inch floppy disk containing the report in . WordPerfect 5.1 format will be provided, to the Town, as set forth in the RFP. . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM SECTION 2 . . . 1a 'C'=-Y _:::J\ . . . . . . . . . Section Three ..<._MMM'" _~~ _ _M___ M MM _ - - Qua[i fications and E~perience . . . SECTION 3 - QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE . Overview of Corporate Qualifications Cashin Associates, P.c. (CA) is a multi-disciplinary engineering and . environmental consulting firm which has been providing professional services throughout the region since 1959. The firm offers a wide range of services including: . . . coastal zone management studies . environmental consulting and permitting . civil and site engineering . architectural design . electrical/mechanical engineering . construction inspection . environmental audits . building inspections/site assessments . solid waste management . insurance investigations/construction claims analysis . wastewater management and environmental engineering . tank management and design services . hazardous material management studies . roadway/highway design and inspection . traffic and transportation engineering . landscape architecture . CADD and computer services . . . CA is staffed with approximately 80 engineers, environmental scientists, . planners, architects, inspectors, surveyors and other technical support personnel. With offices in Suffolk and Putnam Counties, New York, Woodcliff . CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . . . Lake, New Jersey, and Miami, Florida, CA is active throughout the eastern . United States. The firm also provides inspections and other specialized services throughout the nation. . Coastal Zone Planninl! Services CA has provided extensive services in the preparation of coastal zone . management programs, local waterfront revitalization plans, harbor plans and other coastal and marine studies. The firm has full in-house capabilities in the planning and environmental disciplines required for this work. CA's staff . includes planners, environmental scientists, marine scientists, geologists, zoning and land use specialists, coastal and civil engineers, and mapping specialists. CA's engineering divisions provide support services in coastal engineering, . transportation planning and civil engineering, as necessary. CA's coastal zone experience also includes numerous projects involving tidal wetlands, marine resources, dredging and dredged material disposal, coastal erosion control, flood . hazard areas, and water quality. . CA recently prepared a draft harbor management plan for Oyster Bay Harbor, and we are presently assisting the Village of Port Jefferson and the Village of Sag Harbor in developing their harbor management plans. CA assisted the Town of Brookhaven on the preparation of a comprehensive . town-wide local waterfront revitalization program. More recently, we have . CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . . . assisted the Town with site specific improvement plans for various Town . shorefront parks and marinas. CA has undertaken the preparation of waterfront revitalization programs for the Towns of Southold, Islip, Huntington, and North . Hempstead, and the Villages of Lloyd Harbor, Port Jefferson and Sag Harbor, NY. CA has also prepared a Generic Environmental Impact Statement for a waterfront development plan for Oyster Bay Harbor, an embayment with important fishery, commercial and recreational resources on Long Island's North Shore. These projects involved the inventory and analysis of a wide range of . environmental conditions, including erosion control, ecological resources, recreational facilities, existing land use, water supply, surface/groundwater quality, endangered species habitat, commercial/residential uses, and economics. . CA has prepared a comprehensive plan and environmental study of the Barrier Beach and Bay Island Communities on the South Shore in the Town of Babylon, . NY. The project involved the analyses of recreational usage of coastal areas and other recreational facilities, and addressed complex issues relating to water quality, wetlands and coastal erosion. CA recently completed technical studies . on erosion control and shoreline management for the New York State . Department of State relating to the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force Management Plan. The firm has initiated technical studies as part of the Peconic Estuary Program being conducted for the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the u.S. Environmental Protection Agency. . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . . . Waterfront and Coastal Enl!ineerinl! ExDerience . CA's engineering design group is well experienced in the planning, design and permitting of waterfront structures, including erosion control facilities, beaches, parks, marinas, fishing piers, and other recreational facilities. These projects . have included the development of master plans for coastal engineering and shorefront projects. CA has also worked on the design and permitting of seawalls, bulkheads, docks, marinas, and dredge material disposal areas. CA's . structural and civil engineers have extensive experience in the design of waterfront and marine structures. The staff is further strengthened by several on-staff marine scientists who have specific backgrounds in the environmental . aspects of construction in coastal areas. CA's landscape architectural group is experienced in site work for shoreline parks and other developments. Recent CA projects have included engineering and environmental services for . channel dredging, erosion control and beach nourishment projects for municipalities on Long Island, NY. CA has also provided design and inspection services for construction of bulkheads, jetties, marinas and related structures for . various public and private clients. CA's environmental and planning divisions have prepared coastal zone management plans for extensive areas of the New York shoreline, including both undeveloped and port areas. CA has performed . numerous site specific studies of coastal wetlands, sensitive habitats, marine ecosystems and water quality. CA's environmental division also provides permit application services for waterfront and coastal engineering projects, and the . staff is highly knowledgeable of the permits and approvals required from the local, county, state and federal agencies. . CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . . . The project experience summarized above has helped to make the CA staff . extremely familiar with the shoreline of Southold Town, and the environmental, land use, flooding and erosion control issues associated with the Town's coastal zone. CA is aware of the sources of existing information which are available, . as well as the governmental and scientific organizations which can provide relevant data and technical input. As a local firm involved in Long Island coastal zone management, CA has a realistic knowledge of the types of policies . and administrative procedures that are utilized for land use regulation, development and erosion and flooding control. . Proiect ExDerience - Waterfront Planninl! PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . . . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM Town of Southold, Southold, New York Assistance to the Town in preparing a waterfront management plan and GElS for the Town's coastal zone, which included 163 linear miles of diverse shoreline on Peconic Bay, Gardiners Bay and Long Island Sound. CA provided comprehensive inventories and mapping of existing environmental conditions including critical habitats, recreational facilities, wetlands, residential/ commercial developments, and other factors. Important issues included water quality of coastal waters, coastal erosion, dredging, public access and recreation, and protection of shellfish resources. The project included identification of inlets, channels, marina basins and other marine areas requiring dredging, existing disposal sites, and analysis of State Coastal Zone Management Policies relating to dredging. CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIfiCATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . . PROJECT: Client: Services: . . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . . . . DRAFT HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OYSTER BAY HARBOR Town of Oyster Bay, Oyster Bay, New York Development of a draft comprehensive plan for management of Oyster Bay Harbor and its marine and coastal resources. Issues addressed in the plan include water quality protection, recreational usage, wetland preservation, special habitats, commercial shellfishing, dredging and spoil disposal needs, and designated areas for recreational boat mooring. The plan involved a detailed inventory of the bay's resources including water quality, sediments, shellfish abundance, wetland distribution, wildlife habitats, and recreational/visual resources. PORT JEFFERSON HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN Village of Port Jefferson, New York Assistance to the Village in preparing policies for Harbor Management for Port Jefferson Harbor, a north shore embayment with important commercial, recreational, scenic and ecological resources. CA is presently preparing a harbor and shorefront plan for the Village. VILLAGE OF SAG HARBOR - HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN AND LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM Village of Sag Harbor, New York CA is preparing a harbor plan and waterfront revitalization plan for Sag Harbor, and important Village, historic and harbor district on Long Island's South Shore. The project involves detailed inventories of existing environmental, recreational and commercial resources of the harbor, and the identification of conflicting uses and issues associated with the harbor and shoreline, including protection of water quality, wetland preservation, shoreline development, navigation, erosion control, flooding, and aesthetics. CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION J . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . . PROJECT: Client: . Services: . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . . . TOWN-WIDE PROGRAM LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION Town of Brookhaven, Brookhaven, New York Preparation of a waterfront revitalization and management program and GElS for the Town's coastal zone, which consists of over 100 linear miles of shoreline including barrier beach, open ocean, bays, wetlands and developed shorelines. CA conducted detailed inventories of existing environmental conditions, proposed development, and potential environmental impacts. Technical areas included water quality, ecology, wetlands, land use/zoning, cultural resources, dredging and spoil disposal, residential/ commercial development and development potential. Work involved close coordination with N.Y. State and local governmental agencies. The project included identification of inlets, channels, marina basins and other marine areas requiring dredging, existing disposal sites, problems associated with dredging, and analysis of State Coastal Zone Management Policies relating to dredging. TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF HAZARD MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR LONG ISLAND COASTAL ZONE New York State Department of State, Albany, New York Technical analysis to evaluate alternative long term strategies for management of specific Long Island marine coastal areas subject to erosion and flooding hazards. The study is being done as part of the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force, implemented in re- sponse to storm damage incurred during 1992-93. The study involves an analysis of various erosion control and shorefront stabilization alternatives and their costs to construct and maintain. ANALYSIS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR COASTAL HAZARD PLANNING, NEW YORK COASTAL MARINE ZONE New York State Department of State, Albany, New York Detailed review and analysis of existing organizations, regulatory authorities and program responsibilities for selected local governments in study area relating to land use and development planning, regulation and emergency response to coastal flooding and erosion. CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . PROJECT: Client: . Services: . . PROJECT: Client: Services: . . . . . MANAGEMENT PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR DREDGING AND DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works, Yaphank, New York Comprehensive ecological and environmental analyses and long- term plan for County-wide dredging program, including investigation/analysis of biological and ecological resources for approximately 150 locations. Inventories of rare/endangered species, wetlands and sensitive habitats included. Use of dredged materials for erosion control and beach nourishment is an important issue addressed in the study. PECONIC ESTUARY PROGRAM SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATION STUDY Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Riverhead, NY CA has been selected as one of the main consultants on the Peconic Estuary Program. CA is conducting a detailed study of submerged aquatic vegetation and other resources in the Peconic Estuary and its ecological importance to the ecology of the Peconic Estuary. CA's work includes a detailed field survey of seagrass distribution and abundance, and the development of a plan to enhance the ecological and recreational resources of the bay. LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PLAN FOR VILLAGE OF LLOYD HARBOR Village of Lloyd Harbor, Lloyd Harbor, New York Inventory of existing coastal resources including wildlife habitats, recreational facilities and land uses, and preparation of a coastal zone management plan for the Village. CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . PROJECT: Client: . Services: . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . . . . TOWN OF HUNTINGTON REVITALIZATION PROGRAM LOCAL WATERFRONT Town of Huntington, Huntington, New York Preparation of a GElS and waterfront management plan for the Town's coastal zone, which consists of shoreline areas along Huntington Harbor, Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island Sound, and associated inlets and creeks. CA's work has included detailed inventories of existing environmental conditions including wetlands, water quality, land use, critical habitats and cultural resources. Important issues addressed included: development potential, dredging and spoil disposal, and preservation of ecological resources and habitats. TOWN OF NORTH HEMPSTEAD LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM Town of North Hempstead, Manhasset, New York Assistance to Town in preparation of a waterfront revitalization management plan and GElS for the Town's coastal zone, which includes developed harbors, wetlands and undeveloped areas. Primary issues have included water quality of embayments, water- dependent uses of the shoreline, and public access. CA has provided technical assistance on all aspects of the plan, including detailed inventories of existing environmental resources and land use. TOWN OF ISLlP LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM Town of Islip, Islip, New York Technical and planning assistance to the Town in preparing the Town's waterfront and coastal zone management plan in accordance with New York State and local requirements. CA specifically assisted in coastal zone issues relating to land use and proposed coastal improvement projects, in preparation of basemaps of existing/future environmental conditions, and in organizing the plan in format required by New York State. CA's work involved detailed inventories of the Town's shoreline, including the channels, canals and marinas on Great South Bay. CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . PROJECT: Client: . Services: . . PROJECT: Client: . Services: .> . . . BARRIER AND BAY ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY AND PLAN Town of Babylon, Lindenhurst, New York and New York State Department of State, Albany, New York Comprehensive study of the shoreline environment and communities, and identification of environmental impacts and mitigation for sensitive coastal areas in the Town of Babylon. CA's work included detailed recreational analysis, inventory and assessment of existing data relating to coastal bird, shellfish/finfish distribution, wetlands, water quality, coastal erosion, and dredging/beach nourishment needs and practices in the area. GENERIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE OYSTER BAY SHORELINE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Town of Oyster Bay, Oyster Bay, New York Preparation of a Generic Environmental Impact Statement and technical studies for Oyster Bay Harbor Redevelopment plan. Project involved a comprehensive evaluation of environmental and socioeconomic conditions surrounding the harbor, and important residential, commercial and historic areas. Main issues addressed included preservation of water quality in the bay, which includes a national wildlife preserve and commercially valuable shellfish resources. CA conducted a detailed analysis of contamination threats to water quality and shellfish as technical support to the EIS. Analysis included resolution of conflicting uses of the harbor including shoreline development, residential use, recreation and habitat protection. MIAMOGUE POINT WETLAND/EROSION CONTROL STUDIES, JAMESPORT, NEW YORK Town of Riverhead, Riverhead, New York Planning and environmental studies relating to erosion control, beach nourishment and channel dredging for an area along Peconic Bay. CA conducted a detailed ecological study of a valuable tidal wetland and wildlife habitat threatened by shoreline erosion. Alternative actions and costs for erosion control were investigated. Coordination and consultation with New York State and local officials included in CA's responsibilities. CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . . .- WADING RIVER DREDGING AND BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT, WADING RIVER, NEW YORK Town of Riverhead, Riverhead, New York Planning and environmental services for dredging of a navigable waterway and restoration of an adjacent public beach subject to erosion. CA designed and supervised dredging and beach nourishment programs to restore a navigable channel and provide enhancement to eroded shoreline areas with residential homes. Preservation of sensitive wetlands and marine habitats adjacent to the sites was critical aspect of CA's involvement. CA was also responsible for acquisition of permits from the NYSDEC, Corp of Engineers, and NYS Department of State. Proiect Experience - Shorefront and Recreational Site Improvements PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . PROJECT: Client: . Services: . . STEHLIIRANSOM BEACH RECONSTRUCTION AND EROSION CONTROL, BAYVILLE, NEW YORK Town of Oyster Bay Department of Public Works, Syosset, New York Study, survey and design for reconstruction of popular shorefront recreational facility severely damaged by winter storms and erosion. Reconstruction of entrance, parking lot, lighting, walkways, fencing, erosion control structures and beach required. Installation of recreational facilities including playground and picnic areas also included. CA's responsibilities included subtidal survey, preparation of beach profiles, engineering evaluation of existing facilities, design, and permit applications. LANDING AVENUE PARK BULKHEAD AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS, SMITHTOWN, NEW YORK Town of Smithtown Department of Environment and Waterways, Smithtown, New York Survey, engineering design and inspection for site improvements to shorefront park including new 200 ft. long bulkhead to replace highly deteriorated and damaged bulkhead, and for erosion control. Design of improved drainage system also included. The park is located at the Nissequogue River estuary on Long Island's North Shore. CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . . PROJECT: Client: Services: . . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . PROJECT: Client: Services: . . . . . MASTER PLAN FOR WADING RIVER BOAT RAMP AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK Town of Riverhead, Riverhead, New York Submission of Federal and State applications, environmental assessment and supporting technical data for beach nourishment and maintenance dredging of a navigational channel in Wading River, New York, including Corps of Engineers and State permits. CA supervised the dredging and beach nourishment during the construction phase. Preparation of Master Plan for site improvements to boat landing ramp, marina and shore support facilities included in the project. Project provided for use of dredged material to reduce erosion on critical beach areas. MT. SINAI PIER AND BEACH RESTORATION AND REPLACE- MENT, MT. SINAI, TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK Town of Brookhaven, Medford, New York Survey, design and construction inspection for major recon- struction of 400-ft. long fishing pier destroyed by severe winter storms. Work involved dredging of sand deposited in Mt. Sinai Channel and deposition for restoration of adjacent beach areas at Cedar Beach, replacement of aids to navigation including inlet light, and installation of boardwalks and other facilities for public access and recreational fishing. SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO DAVIS PARK MARINA FACILITY TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK Town of Brookhaven, Medford, New York Inspection, damage survey, subsurface surveys, design and construction supervision for repairs and improvements to shorefront park and marina with 250 boat capacity. Site improvements to boardwalks, playground, bathrooms, docks and bulkhead included. Erosion control for severely damaged beach included in the project. CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . . PROJECT: Client: Services: . . PROJECT: Client: . Services: . PROJECT: Client: . . . . . . SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO BLUE POINT DOCK RECREATIONAL AREA, BLUE POINT, NEW YORK Town of Brookhaven, Medford, New York Inspection, survey, design and construction supervision for repairs and improvements to shorefront recreational area including boardwalks, bulkhead, lighting, fencing and fishing pier. Repair of damage caused by severe winter storms and erosion included in project. IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR SEAFORD HARBOR YACHT CLUB MARINA IMPROVEMENTS Town of Babylon, Lindenhurst, New York Inspection of existing conditions, identification of improvement alternatives and cost estimates for upgrading municipal marina and associated recreational facilities. HARBOR CLUB MARINA EVALUATION, PORT JEFFERSON HARBOR, NY Group II, Port Jefferson, New York Preparation of and Environmental Impact Statement, permit acquisition, and environmental studies for development of a marina, residential complex and public access areas on Port Jefferson Harbor. CA's services included collection/analysis, land use/ socioeconomic analyses. Major issues included dredging needs, visual quality of the shoreline, public access, recreation and wastewater disposal. CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . PROJECT: . Client: Services: . . . . . . . . ROOSEVELT MEMORIAL PARK AND MARINA IMPROVEMENTS, OYSTER BAY, NEW YORK Town of Oyster Bay, Oyster Bay, New York Design and construction phase services for ballfield improvements including lighting, and electrical/lighting improvements for Marina. Engineering services for improvements to fuel storage systems also provided by CA. SITE PLANNING AND MARINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES FOR THE LONG ISLAND AQUARIUM, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK Okeanos Ocean Research Institution, Hampton Bays, NY Preparation of environmental impact statement, wetland permit applications, sampling and analysis of surface water quality, and assessment of potential impacts from the aquarium. CA is also providing site engineering design services for the project. CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . . . Client References . 1. Jeffrey Kassner Director Division of Environmental Protection Town of Brookhaven 3233 Route 112 Medford, NY 11763 . (516) 451-6955 2. John P. Petito Commissioner Department of Public Works Town of Islip . 401 Main Street Islip, NY 11751 (516) 224-5610 3. Anthony Varrichio, P.E. Town Engineer . Town of Babylon 200 East Sunrise Highway Lindenhurst, NY 11757 (516) 957-3124 4. Stephen P. Hayduk, P.E. Commissioner . Suffolk County Dept. of Public Works 335 Yaphank Avenue Yaphank, NY 11980 (516) 852-4010 5. Peter A. Scully . President Islip Resource Recovery Agency 401 Main Street Islip, NY 11751 (516) 224-5691 6. Karl J. Leupold, P.E. . Commissioner Department of Public Works Town of Oyster Bay 150 Miller Place Syosset, NY 11791 (516) 921-7347 . CASHIN ASSOCIATES QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE SECTION 3 . . VI.!AGE OF SAG HAtBOR . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.e. SERVICES HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN AND LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM . I. I . . Sag Harbor Cove . J'-, / /~?' .J' .~ ....../.. ..' ..../.. .-- -.---.-- . ~ - I .:~ t J ~ . .---.--- . . Long Wharf, Downtown Sag Harbor . . . VILLAGE OF LLOYD HARBOR . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.e. SERVICES LOCAL WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PLAN . . . Lloyd Harbor . ~l . . . Lloyd Harbor . . . . VILLAGE OF PORT JEFFERSON . CASHIN ASSOCIATES P.c. SERVICES HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN . . . Bayles Dock - Village of Port Jefferson . . . I. Wetlands and Shoreline Development . . . . TOWN OF OYSTER BAY CASHIN ASSOCIATES SERVICES RANSOM BEACH RECONSTRUCTION STORM DAMAGE SURVEY & DESIGN FOR EROSION CONTROL . . . . Ransom Beach looking east, showing major loss of beach and damage to parking and utilities. . . . . Ransom Beach looking west, showing loss of beach and undermining of shoreline. . . . . TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.e. SERVICES BLUE POINT AVENUE FISHING PIER DAMAGE SURVEY & DESIGN FOR RECONSTRUCTION . Blue Point Avenue fishing pier. Looking south. . . . . Portion of failing bulkhead and localized erosion. . . . . . . TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.e. SERVICES DAVIS PARK MARINA REPAIRS, FIRE ISLAND N.Y. DAMAGE SURVEY & DESIGN FOR REPAIRS & EROSION CONTROL . . -~~ ~ - .,~ ,',-".- '0;;.',,' '-~...~.r-~~ ,- . . " ';"'.i."I~1R:~ ."- I 'l~n ,~" f~V ,f r 1 of, '1 ~' f 'If ...- . Bayside area, showing severe loss of beach and exposure of bulkhead deadman system. . -~--, __ ,~~~.:L:.-::: ... :~ ------' . ---'~ ""'""- ".....;.. ................. ..n<.', - ..... ~---'.- - ,...,.. ......."'" - ~~~~.~ co:' 'x;~--,w"v---""'~ --.. ,- . . .~~<,.,;C . ..- ..: ~"?t~'-'U"-l;;lll- --'ll ~ Failure of bulkhead at marina. . . . . JalsL ~~ . . . . . . . . . Section Four Team . . . SECTION 4 - PROJECT TEAM . General Personnel Resources With a staff of approximately 80 engineers, planners, environmental scientists, . architects, construction inspectors and other technical support personnel, Cashin Associates (CA) has in-house capabilities in the wide variety of disciplines required for the firm's engineering, environmental, planning and construction . supervision projects. The firm's environmental personnel have expertise in planning, biology, geology, marine/coastal resources, land use/zoning, traffic, environmental regulations, solid/hazardous waste management, and . socioeconomics. The engineering staff includes civil, environmental, sanitary, mechanical, electrical, transportation and coastal engineers, landscape architects, inspectors, surveyors and technicians. The construction inspection . staff, which consists of licensed engineers and NICET inspectors, has extensive experience in construction of roadways, bridges, and other public works improvements. The firm also utilizes state-of-the-art CADD systems and full- . time CADD operators for design and mapping services. CA's project teams are selected to meet the specific needs of the assignment. . All work is performed under the direct supervision of experienced and licensed project managers who adhere to the highest standards in technical quality control. CA places great importance on maintaining close liaison with the firm's clients, and in completing projects within schedule and budgetary limits. . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES. P.c. PROJECT TEAM SECTION 4 . . . CA has engineering and environmental personnel with specific expertise in . shoreline projects, marine science, coastal resources, and coastal engineering. These capabilities will be valuable in preparing the Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold. CA has the professional and support resources to . complete the work within the time frame required by the Town. Proiect Team . Cashin Associates' project team has recent direct experience in preparation of . harbor plans. master plans and shorefront planning for municipal clients. Mr. Gregory T. Greene will serve as Principal-in-Charge. Mr. Greene has directed the previous environmental and planning work performed by CA for the Town of Southold l WRP over the last several years, and he has directed the . preparation of numerous other master plans and coastal zone studies throughout long Island. Ms. Wendy Salvati will serve as Project Manager. Ms. Salvati is a Senior Planner and a specialist in coastal zone planning. She has assisted numerous municipalities in site and shoreline planning in Nassau and Suffolk . Counties. The team will also include Ms. laura Schwanof, R.l.A., an environ- mental scientist and specialist in soil conservation, tidal wetlands, and ecology. She was formerly associated with the Soil Conservation Service before joining . CA. Both Ms. Salvati and Ms. Schwanof were primary participants in CA's previous lWRP work for Southold. Mr. John Ellsworth, who will serve as Senior Environmental Scientist for the project, has directed CA's work on coastal . planning for the Town of Oyster Bay, and on technical studies performed for the New York State Department of State. Harold Mayer, Esq., Environmental . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. PROJECT TEAM SECTION 4 . . . Counsel, will assist in review of existing regulation, at the Federal, State and . local levels, and in evaluating administrative and governmental aspects of plan implementation. Mr. James Gladysz, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer, has directed engineering evaluations and design for erosion control, municipal marinas, beaches, shorefront structures, recreational facilities on numerous projects on . Long Island, and he has directed the preparation of Master Plans for shoreline improvements at a variety of sites for the Town of Brookhaven. Technical expertise will also be provided by Mr. John Guidi, PE, LS, a coastal engineer . with over 30 years of experience in erosion, shoreline construction and dredging in Suffolk County. An outline of the project team is as follows. . . . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C. PROJECT TEAM SECTION 4 . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. - PROJECT TEAM . Gregory T. Greene Director of Environmental Principal-in-Charge Programs Wendy Salvati Chief Planner Project Manager Land Use/Planning . Laura Schwanof, RLA Landscape Architect Ecology and Resource Inventory Harold Mayer, Esq. Environmental Counsel Regulatory Review and Evaluation . John Ellsworth Senior Environmental Data Analyses and Scientist Report Preparation James A. Gladysz, PE Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Evaluation, Erosion Control John Guidi, PE, LS Senior Coastal Engineer Coastal Engineering, Ero- . sion Control Robert Pedneault, PE Environmental Engineer Field Inventories, Coastal Resources Analyses Stephen Ferretti Transportation Engineer Traffic/ Transportation issues . Joseph Iannucci CADD Supervisor CADD/Mapping Lynn Southard Graphic Artist CADD/Mapping . Resumes of Key Personnel . Resumes of key personnel to be assigned to this project follow in this section. . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. PROJECT TEAM SECTION 4 . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. . GREGORY T. GREENE Director of Environmental Programs EDUCATION/REGISTRATION B.A., Geological and Geophysical Sciences, Princeton University, 1975 M.S., Marine Environmental Sciences, SUNY at Stony Brook, 1978 . EXPERIENCE . As Director of Environmental Programs at Cashin Associates, Mr. Greene serves as project manager for major environmental planning and assessment projects. He has directed the preparation of numerous environmental impact statements, master plans and technical studies for coastal zone management and public works projects. He is highly knowledgeable of local, state, and federal regulatory requirements. Recent environmental projects completed under Mr. Greene's direction included: . Preparation of a comprehensive environmental study and plan for the barrier beach and bay islands system in the Town of Babylon, NY. . . Preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Plans for the Towns of Southold, Brookhaven, North Hempstead and Oyster Bay, NY. . Environmental/planning studies for the Oyster Bay Harbor Redevelopment Plan, including technical studies of shellfish and marine resources. . . Series of technical studies as part of the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force for the New York State Department of State. . Assessment of biological resources at approximately 150 coastal locations in Suffolk County as part of a Dredging GElS and Master Plan. . . Detailed field study and analysis of the distribution of aquatic vegetation as Part of the Peconic Estuary Program . Other recent assignments conducted by Mr. Greene included: area planning studies and site assessments throughout the northeast for the U.S. Postal Service; various ecological, marine and coastal zone management studies throughout Long Island; preparation of the master plan for restoration of Central Park, NY; environmental assessments for utility installations as part of the restoration of Ellis Island, NY. Mr. Greene was also employed for four years at a national environmental consulting firm where he was involved in the preparation of environmental impact studies for the U.S. EPA. He acquired extensive experience in project planning, field work, data analysis, EIS preparation and expert testimony in this position. He served as project manager for a major EIS on the proposed remediation of PCB-contaminated sediments from the Hudson River, and for an assessment of impacts of sewering on marine resources of the Great South Bay, NY. He prepared EIS's for regional wastewater disposal systems on Long Island, upstate New York, New Jersey, and Puerto Rico. . . . . . . Mr. Greene's specific areas of expertise are coastal geology, marine ecology and coastal erosion. In addition to his educational training in these fields, he has completed numerous assignments in these areas as a consultant to various governmental clients. In addition, he has written numerous technical articles on the geological and biological aspects of long Island's marine environment. An outline of projects for which Mr. Greene served as Chief Scientist in the area of coastal/marine studies is given below. . Impacts of Shoreline Development on Shellfish Resources in lake Montauk, NY -- Town of East Hampton . . Distribution of Surficial Sediments and Seagrasses in Eastern Great South Bay, NY -- New York State Sea Grant Institute . Estuarine Impact Assessment for Shellfish Resources in Great South Bay, NY -- US Environmental Protection Agency . . Environmental Inventory of the long Beach - Lido Beach Area -- Nassau County Department of Public Works . Engineering Analysis of Dredge Spoil Disposal Alternatives, Town of Hempstead, NY -- US Army Corps of Engineers . . EIS for the Hudson River PCB Reclamation/Containment Project -- US Environmental Protection Agency . Hard Clams, Competitors, Predators and Physical Parameters in Great South Bay, NY -- New York State Sea Grant Institute . . Coastal Erosion Study for Shoreline Property, East Hampton, NY -- New York State Sea Grant Institute . Environmental Assessment for Underwater Utility Lines, Restoration of Ellis Island, NY -- National Park Service . . Marine Fisheries Inventory for the Northwestern Atlantic -- National Marine Fisheries Service . Population Dynamics of Hard Clams in Great South Bay, NY -- Marine Sciences Research Center, Stony Brook . . Winter Kill of Hard Clams in Great South Bay During the Severe Winter of 1976- 77 -- New York State Sea Grant Institute . Bacterial Contamination of Shellfish and Shellfish Growing Waters, Great South Bay, NY -- Princeton University . Growth of Hard Clams in Great South Bay, NY -- Princeton University . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. GREGORY T. GREENE PAGE 2 . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. WENDY WEBER SALVATI Environmental Planner . EDUCATION/REGISTRATION B.A., Environmental Design, SUNY at Buffalo, 1984 B.A., Geography, SUNY at Buffalo, 1984 M.S., Urban Planning, Hunter College, NY, 1989 . EXPERIENCE . As a Planner at CA, Ms. Salvati is responsible for projects involving environmental planning, site planning, and socioeconomic analyses. She is primarily involved in coastal management planning and zoning and land use studies for Long Island municipalities. Her recent project experience also includes preparation of coastal management planning programs as well as land use and zoning analyses in support of environmental impact statements for several major site developments on Long Island. Recent assignments conducted by Ms. Salvati include: . Preparation of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Plans (LWRP) for the Towns of Southold, Brookhaven and Huntington; . . Preparation of a harbor management plan for the Village of Port Jefferson and Village of Sag Harbor; . Preparation of a draft Bay Resources Management Plan for the Oyster Bay/Cold Spring Harbor Complex for the Town of Oyster Bay; . . Development of a feasibility study and conceptual master plan for a proposed golf course recreational facility for Suffolk County, NY; . Assistance with the preparation of the Town of Islip's LWRP draft report; . . Preparation of the sections concerning recreational use, public access and development potential for the Town of Babylon Barrier Beach and Bay Island Community Study; . Visual impact analysis, assessment and master plan for proposed residential development/marina at a former industrial site on Port Jefferson Harbor, NY; . . Preparation of the Town of North Hempstead's Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan (LWRP) and associated EIS; and . . Review of regulatory requirements and conducted a noise monitoring study for preparation of a community noise ordinance for the Town of Oyster Bay, NY. Prior to joining CA, Ms. Salvati held a position of Planner for another engineering! environmental firm, where she was responsible for various environmental impact studies and site planning projects. She was the primary author of a regional Generic Environmental Impact Statement for future land use in a 20 square mile area in the Town of Huntington, NY. Ms. Salvati's prior experience includes assignments within the New York City Department of Planning and the Downtown Flushing Development Corp., where she was responsible for zoning studies, land use analyses and commercial revitalization programs. . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. . LAURA ZAIMES SCHWANOF, R.L.A. Landscape Architect/Ecologist EDUCATION/REGISTRATION . B.S., Forest Biology, State University of New York, College of Environmental Sciences and Forestry, 1980 B.S., Environmental Sciences and Art, Syracuse University, 1980 R.L.A., 1994 . American Society of Landscape Architects Society for Ecological Restoration National Audubon Society The Nature Conservancy The Wildlife Society EXPERIENCE . Ms. Schwanof is a landscape architect and ecologist at CA who is responsible for site and landscape designs, the preparation of ecological studies, wetland and vegetation surveys, and other environmental projects. Her areas of expertise include terrestrial and wetland ecology, soil and water conservation, and site planning. She has recently completed several major impact statements for projects in Suffolk County, New York, and she is especially knowledgeable of the biological, physical and regulatory aspects of Long Island. Ms. Schwanof's recent experience includes a study of colonial waterbird habitats and other wildlife resources in the Town of Babylon Barrier Beach area. She has prepared landscape designs for a wide variety of land use types including parks, recreational areas, wildlife preserves, residential properties, municipal facilities, and commercial properties. . . Ms. Schwanof received a first place award for a Bird Sanctuary for Hofstra University in Uniondale in a national competition for landscape design for conversion of a recharge basin into a wildlife sanctuary and education center. . She has assisted in the preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Plans (LWRP's) for several major municipalities on Long Island, NY including the Towns of Huntington, Southold, Brookhaven and Islip. She recently completed detailed ecological studies in support of Environmental Assessments for proposed new highway construction in Dutchess County, NY and Westchester County, NY. . Prior to joining CA, Ms. Schwanof worked for eight years as a Soils Conservationist and Acting District Conservationist for the USDA Soils Conservation Services, where she was responsible for conservation planning for numerous projects on Long Island. Her responsibilities included field research, review of site plans, public presentations, and coordination with other governmental agencies. Examples of projects completed by Ms. Schwanof include: . . . . LAURA ZAIMES SCHWANOF (continued) . . Planned, designed, supervised and inspected erosion and sediment control plans for numerous construction projects. . . Participated in Coastal Vegetation Steering Committee to coordinate Federal, State and local efforts on bluff and shoreline stabilization. . Various soil conservation, site plan review and farm planning studies in the Towns of East Hampton and Southampton. . . Preparation of the Potential Erosion Hazard Area Map for the Town of Oyster Bay. . Coordination of soil and water conservation activities with other governmental agencies, including the Nassau and Suffolk Cooperative Extension Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, and New York Sea Grant. . . . . . . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. . HAROLD B. MAYER, JR., ESQ. Environmental Counsel EDUCATION/REGISTRATION . B.A., Liberal Arts, Pennsylvania State University, 1973 J.D., Sf. John's University, 1977 EXPERIENCE . Mr. Mayer has extensive experience in regulatory, zoning and socioeconomic Issues associated with site development and other construction projects. His expertise also includes permit requirements, public financing and government administration. He has over 14 years of experience, including 9 years in local government. His recent experience includes participation on behalf of the Town of Oyster Bay, New York, for the planning and procurement of a 1000 tpd resource recovery facility. Mr. Mayer serves as a legal and technical director for Cashin Associates' major surety projects. His responsibilities include review and analysis of contract terms, conditions and procedures. His role further includes assessment of any breach of contract claims, whether by commission or omission. His familiarity with government contract procedures is particularly applicable in the timely assessment of technical surety issues. He serves as an interface between CA's engineering technical staff and the legal/technical staff of the client and its counsel. . . Mr. Mayer served with local government for nine years. While with the Town of Oyster Bay, New York, he served in a variety of capacities, including most recently as the Chief Town Negotiator for the Town's Industrial Development Agency. As such, he directed the work of the negotiating team and was lead negotiator in contract talks. Those negotiations resulted in a Memorandum of Understanding with a major construction company to build and operate a 1500 tpd resource recovery facility. He coordinated and supervised the efforts of engineers, lawyers, insurance agents and bond underwriters to create a viable vendor-equity project to be financed with tax exempt debt. He also participated in the preparation and review of the EIS and other permit documents required for the project. Mr. Mayer served as the Executive Secretary of the Zoning Board of Appeals in Oyster Bay, a town with over 300,000 people. In that post, he administered a department which processes over 50 variance hearings a month, while also functioning as the key advisor to the citizen members of the Board. While a Deputy Town Attorney, Mr. Mayer had drafted much of the current Zoning Ordinance now in effect in Oyster Bay. . . . Mr. Mayer has been a member of the New York Lawyer's Association since his admission to the bar in 1978. He has subsequently been admitted to the Federal District Courts in both the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York and the U.S. Supreme Court. He is also a member of the Fidelity & Surety Committee of the American Bar Association and its Torts and Insurance Practice section. In 1986, he was nominated by the Long Island Association (the bi-county Chamber of Commerce) for membership on the local Private Industry Council under the Federal Job Partnership Act. In making that nomination, the Association recognized him as "...an experienced attorney, government administrator, corporate executive and active community leader". After four years as a member, he was recently elected Chairman of the Council. . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. . JOHN M. ELLSWORTH Environmental Scientist EDUCATION/REGISTRATION . Master of Science, Marine Environmental Sciences, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 1982. Bachelor of Science, Biology-Geology, University of Rochester, 1978. EXPERIENCE . Mr. Ellsworth is an Environmental Scientist at CA who specializes in projects relating to marine science, coastal zone management, and environmental impact assessment. He is highly experienced in the application of computer modeling to processing of environmental and field data. Mr. Ellsworth's recent project experience includes: . . preparation of a series of technical studies on coastal erosion, hazard protection and marine/coastal resources for the New York State Department of State as part of the Governor's Coastal Erosion Task Force Program; . preparation of an EIS and permit applications for a proposed marina in Port Jefferson Harbor including mitigation measures for surface waters and wetlands; . · conceptual design of channel stabilization and shoreline improvement project at a Town of Riverhead recreational facility in Wading River; . preparation of permit requirements for a proposed dredging and beach nourishment project in Jamesport, NY, including a detailed tidal wetlands inventory; . . preparation of a Bay Resources Management Plan for the Oyster Bay/Cold Spring Harbor Complex, including plans for wildlife habitat and water quality protection. . assistance in the preparation of Local Waterfront Revitalization Plans for the Towns of South old, Brookhaven, Islip, Huntington, North Hempstead and Oyster Bay. . Prior to joining CA, Mr. Ellsworth was a technical specialist at the Marine Sciences Research Center, Stony Brook, where he was involved in various projects relating to dredging, dredged material disposal, coastal geology, water quality, and marine resources. He worked on several projects for the US Army Corps of Engineers including: development of a microcomputer-based dredged material analysis program; development of a microcomputer-based model of plume dispersion from dredge material disposal; studies of possible dredge material containment sites in New York Harbor; development of a microcomputer-based information storage/retrieval system for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. . . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. JAMES A. GLADYSZ, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer . EDUCATION/REGISTRATION B.C.E., Civil Engineering, Villanova University, 1981 Registered Engineer in the States of New York and Virginia . American Society of Civil Engineers New York State Professional Engineers Society EXPERIENCE Mr. Gladysz has a broad range of planning, design and construction supervision experience in several civil engineering disciplines including marine structures, erosion control, and . environmental permitting and impact analysis. His experience includes design and construction supervision for over 100 coastal engineering projects with New York State including bulkhead design, marina berth plans, erosion control systems, beach nourishment, boat launching ramps, pier design and dredging operations. Mr. Gladysz headed a team for storm damage survey responsible for estimating and design recommendations for damage resulting from several major storms in the last 10 years. Repair work included permitting with . NYSDEC, US Army Corps of Engineers and local agencies. Representative projects include: . preparation of a master plan for improvements to Cedar Beach, a popular recreational beach facility on the Town of Brookhaven's North Shore; . design and construction supervision of gabion erosion control system to protect roadway and renourish beach area adjacent to navigational channel, Mt. Sinai Harbor Channel, NY; . . master plan and design of beach and marina improvements, including erosion control systems, bulkheads, rest rooms, picnic areas, harbormaster quarters and recreational areas, Davis Park, Fire Island; . . design and construction supervision of 400 + L.F. of steel bulkhead at marina including parking facility, dockmaster tower, drainage system and dredging, Port Jefferson Marina, NY; . design and construction supervision of 500 + L.F. of steel bulkhead, including parking and lighting construction, Stony Brook Channel, NY; . . launching ramp design and construction supervision for Mt. Sinai, Port Jefferson, Forge River-Mastic, Maple Ave-East Moriches, and Corey Park-Blue Point Marinas; . master plan and beach nourishment projects involving survey, permitting, construction supervision of material handling, placement and grading for Cedar Beach, Mt. Sinai, West Meadow Beach, Stony Brook and Sands pit Beach, Patchogue, NY; . . survey, design and supervision of inlet dredging, Mecox Bay, Watermill; and . design supervision of free standing steel jetty to protect channel, Abets Creek, East Patchogue, NY. . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. . JOHN GULDI, P.E., L.S. Chief Coastal Engineer EDUCATION/REGISTRATION . B.S., Civil Engineering Technology, Rensalaer polytechnic Institute M.S., Marine Science, Long Island University Special Program - Water, Sewer and Drainage Installation, Cornell University Registered Engineer in NY Licensed Surveyor in NY . EXPERIENCE . Mr. Guidi has approximately 30 years of experience in survey, design and construction of waterfront structures and other public works projects, and he has served as resident engineer for numerous public works projects throughout Suffolk County, NY. His experience includes survey, design and supervision of construction for waterfront structures, channels, marinas and erosion control structures. He has supervised major public works projects involving coordination and management of multiple contractors. An outline of his major project experience is as follows: . Chief of Waterways Division, Suffolk County Department of Public Works -- Mr. Guidi was responsible for the County's waterways construction, maintenance and dredging projects, including engineering, permitting, and inspection for numerous projects throughout Suffolk County, NY. . . Chief of Construction, Suffolk County Department of Environmental Control -- Mr. Guidi supervised $640 million in construction related to the Southwest Sewer District, including pumping stations, treatment plants, service buildings, sewers and ocean outfall. . . Resident Engineer, Suffolk County Department of Public Works -- Mr. Guidi supervised construction of the Shinnecock Canal Lock and Tide Gauge facility in Southhampton, NY. . . Civil Engineer, Corps of Engineers -- Engineer-in-Charge of erosion control projects. . Civil Engineer, New York State Department of Transportation -- Construction supervision for roads, bridges and other public works improvements. . . . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. ROBERT J. PEDNEAULT, P.E. Environmental Engineer EDUCA T10N/REGISTRA TION B.S., 1986, Civil and Environmental Engineering . M.S., 1991, Civil and Environmental Engineering Safety at Hazardous Materials Sites, 40-Hour Certificate, 1990 licensed Professional Engineer in NY . EXPERIENCE Mr. Pedneault is an Environmental Engineer with specialized experience in marine and coastal engineering and science. As an advanced certified diver, he has served as Project Engineer on a variety of assignments involving underwater surveys and inspections. This project experience includes: . . . . preparation of an environmental assessment and technical studies for the proposed long island Aquarium in Riverhead, NY beach and underwater survey of Ransom Beach and subtidal areas, Bayville, NY non-destructive bulkhead inspections for the Town of Huntington, NY underwater analyses and investigations as part of an EIS for the North Fork of long Island Condo Complex, Greenport, NY preparation of dredging plans and permit applications for marinas on the Hudson River and Huntington Bay, NY underwater surveying and mapping for preparation of a long Island Dive Guide canal bottom sounding survey for a waterfront development on long Island's south shore benthic layer and water columns sampling/analysis for bio-assays and chemical toxicology various work involving rescue and care of protected marine mammals for the Okeanos Ocean Research Foundation . . . . . . . . Mr. Pedneault also has expertise in environmental site assessments, remediation projects, and other assignments related to hazardous materials management. He has conducted site inspections and environmental assessments for a wide variety of sites including commercial, industrial and residential site sites. The performance of the audits requires a thorough knowledge of environmental conditions and hazardous materials, as well as the environmental codes and regulations on Federal, state and local levels. In addition to environmental inspections, Mr. Pedneault is assisting on other environmental projects at CA including: preparation of a health and safety plan for all operations at a solid waste disposal facility and landfill, which is a designated FederallSuperfund" site; implementa- tion of testing and remediation program for underground fuel storage tanks for a major municipality on long Island; and an assessment of a non-permitted construction debris landfill. . . . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. . STEPHEN P. FERRETTI Transportation Engineer EDUCATION/REGISTRATION . B.S., Statistics and Economics, SU NY at Buffalo, 1987 M.S., Transportation Engineering and Planning, Polytechnic University, 1991 EXPERIENCE . . Mr. Ferretti presently serves as Project Manager for CA's transportation and traffic engineering studies. He is presently directing traffic impact studies for a major develop- ment in Suffolk County, NY. This study involves extensive field data collection, computer modeling, evaluation of present and future traffic conditions, and design for mitigation for roadways and intersections. Mr. Feretti is also responsible for evaluation and design of traffic signals and other intersection improvements. Mr. Ferretti's recent projects have included traffic studies for: . . Town of Brookhaven Traffic Signal Optimization Program; . the expansion of St. Charles Hospital and Rehabilitation Center, Port Jefferson, NY; . the reconstruction of Anderson Hill Road (CR 18), Westchester County; . the realignment of Arthursburg Road (CR 42), Dutchess County; . the Town of Oyster Bay Jericho Turnpike Corridor; and . . Roadway improvements in downtown Port Jefferson, NY. Mr. Ferretti is also responsible for the planning and design of roadway improvements, site access roads, and parking facilities. He is thoroughly familiar with the latest computer applications for traffic/transportation analysis and has field experience overseeing major construction projects. . With a background in statistics, Mr. Ferretti also assists in other data procuring activities performed in support of CA's environmental projects. He is familiar with numerous types of computer programs and their applications to traffic analyses and environmental assessments. . . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. . JOSEPH IANNUCCI Supervisor - CADD Operations EDUCATION/REGISTRATION . B.S., Architectural Technology, 1981 A.A.S., Electrical Technology, 1975 Engineering Technician Construction Engineering Technology (NICET) . EXPERIENCE . Mr. Iannucci is supervisor of CA's CADD operations, which utilizes AutoCAD ReI. 11 c2. His responsibilities include CADD operations on a multitude of assignments including design of buildings, pump stations, wastewater treatment facilities, storm drainage, ponds and grading. Projects have included municipal, residential, commercial and industrial facilities. Recent CA projects completed utilizing CADD under Mr. Iannucci's supervision include: . . Preparation of coastal zone inventory maps for harbor management plans prepared for the village of Sag Harbor and Village of Lloyd Harbor; . Conduit design for New York Telephone throughout Nassau and Suffolk Counties; . Renovation/addition to service building at the Bay Park Wastewater Treatment Plant for Nassau County DPW; . . Environmental engineering improvements for water/industrial sampling, analysis and pre-treatment for Marsel Mirror Company, Brooklyn, NY; . Water supply and wastewater treatment systems for The Highlands, a multi-unit residential complex in Port Jefferson, NY; . . Design of building renovations for NYNEX Mobile Cellular Telephone Trans- ceiver Sites; and . Interior Renovation of 3 Long Island Lighting Company Improvements. . . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. . LYNN SOUTHARD Graphic Artist EDUCA TION/REGISTRA nON A.A.S., 1975, Advertising, Art & Design . EXPERIENCE . Ms. Southard is a Graphic Artist at Cashin Associates, P.c. who has substantial experience in graphic design, drafting and mapping for civil works projects, especially those related to coastal projects. She is familiar with computer drafting and designing techniques, as well as traditional graphic art procedures. Her relevant project experience includes the following assignments: . preparation of contour maps for the Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project, Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, for the U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers; . . preparation of shoreline map of Coney Island, Brooklyn, NY for the U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers; . preparation of shoreline and subsurface maps for Hempstead Harbor, NY for the U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers; . . Topographic mapping for three shoreline parks - Riverside Park, Port Washington Park and Soundview Park, New York City for the NYC Parks Department; . Preparation of a graphic overlay series for Oyster Bay Harbor showing natural resources, wetlands and other material and man-made features for the Town of Oyster Bay, NY; . . Graphic overlay to Coastal Zone Management Plans, Town of North Hempstead, NY; . Preparation of base maps for the design of storm repairs and erosion control for Stehli-Ransom Beach, for the Town of Oyster Bay, NY; and . . Preparation of coastal zone inventory maps for harbor management plans prepared for the village of Sag Harbor and Village of Lloyd Harbor. . . . . . . JiztL ~s . . . . . . . . Section Five Fee . . . SECTION 5 - FEE PROPOSAL . CA's professional fee for preparing the Harbor Management Plan in accordance with . the work program described in Section 2 of this proposal is $25,000. An estimated manhour and fee breakdown is given in Table 1. CA proposes to invoice the Town on an hourly basis, based on the number of hours . expended on the project by CA professional personnel and their standard billing rates. CA will not bill the Town for travel or other direct expenses, and all labor, direct and indirect costs are included in the total fee. . The RFP states that the Town will pay the consultant in-full upon final submission of the Final Draft Harbor Plan. CA proposes to submit interim invoices during the course . of the project. Cashin Associates request that interim invoices be paid by the Town contingent upon the Town receiving payment for the Department of State. It is recognized that the final amount will not be paid until the Harbor Management Plan . is completed. . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.c. FEE PROPOSAL SECTION 5 . . . Table 1 . . ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND FEE BREAKDOWN SOUTHOLD HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN . Estimated Dollar Manhours Amount Harbor Management Boundary Definition 10 700 Resources Inventory 100 6,500 Plan Development 80 5,500 Review of Regulations and Agency Roles 10 700 Issues Definitions and Analysis 40 2,500 Harbor Management Map and Other Graphics 70 4,000 Draft Report Preparation 40 2,600 Final Report Preparation 20 1,500 Meeting Attendance 15 1,000 385 hours $25,000 . . . . . . CASHIN ASSOCIATES, P.C. fEE PROPOSAL SECTION S . . RFP - HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN DUE: 10:00 A.M.. Tuesday. December 6. 19911. /' 11/141. Larry Tuthill. P.O. Box 162, Greenport, N.Y. 11944 11/152. Wave Abatement Systems, 3392 Oaklawn Ave., Southold, NY 11971-765-9292 - ~FCIr\~ 11/18 3. Andy Forsberg. 56 Washington AVe., Cedarhurst, NY 11516 - 378-7640 11 /28 4. Daniel Rothenberg. 166 Cliffmore Rd.. West Hartford. CT 06107 5. 6. . . December 1,1994 Ms. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 R.ECEMD DEe 6 1994 r 0lIIIl ClII1C SoulhollI Re: Consulting Services for Harbor Management Plan Dear Ms. Terry: Thank you for considering QP&K for the Town of Southold Harbor Management Plan. We are unable to respond to this solicitation since our in-house discip1ines do not support this service. QP&K is a multi-disciplined architectural/engineering firm. We look forward to other opportunities to serve the Town of Southold, so please keep us in mind for future projects. Very truly yours, QUINLIVAN PIERIK & KRAUSE, Architects/Engineers ):t.S~t Joanne F. Stewart Marketing Manager JFS:mvs 73~m-- QUINUVAN PIERIK & KRAUSE ARCHITECTS ENG I N EERS 450 s. SAliNA $T. P.O. BOX 29 SYRACUSE, NY 13201 . 0029 TELEPHONE (315) 472.7806 FAX (315) 472-7600 . . ~ -7#- CDM CAMP DRESSER & McKEE environmental engineers, scientists, planners, & management consultants 100 Crossways Park West Woodbury, New York 11797 496-8400, Fax: 496-8864 November 21, 1994 Ms. Judith T. Terry Southhold Town Clerk Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southhold, New York 11971 RECEIVeD NOV 3 0 1994 fown Clerk SoothoI" Subject: Request for Proposals for Consulting Services to Develop a Harbor Management Plan Dear Ms. Terry: Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM) was pleased to receive the above referenced Request for Proposal. However, due to our current schedule, we will be unable to respond at this time. We appreciate the Towns interest in CDM and look forward to receiving future requests. cc: M. Memoli (dt16/terry) Printed on recycled paper . , . 1./94 Mailed to all on list except for the following which Ruth Oliva faxed copies to: Cashin Associates John Robson Greenman Pedersen, Inc. Louis Saulino Maguire Group Gregory Greene Chashin Associates Philip Sears Allee, King, Rosen & Fleming Inc. Aram Terchunian First Coastal Corp . . COUNCILMEN Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765. 1891 Fax (516) 765 - 1823 SuPERVISOR Thomas H. Wickham Joseph J. Lizewski Alice J. Hussie Joseph L. Townsend. Jr. Ruth D. Oliva Justice Louisa P. Evans TOWN BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Dear Madam/Sir: Enclosed is the list of data that the Town has acquired over the years. The list was requested by those that were present at the pre-bid conference. In order to be absolutely fair, we decided that everyone on the list for RFP's should receive the same list. We hope this listing of the available data base will be helpful in your bid process for the Harbor Management and Erosion Studies for the Town of Southold. Sincerely, ~~ Ruth Oliva Deputy Supervisor . . . . HARBOR MANAGEMENT Listing of available data 1. Mattitick Inlet Study with map of the watershed analysis. 2. Inventory of Natural Resoutces of Mattituck Inlet. 3. LWRP Policy 2 - Water Dependent uses. 4. Parking study of Marinas. 5. Development in Marine Zones. 6. Water quality Assessment. 7. Road run-off study plus addendum from Shellfish Advisory Committee. 8. Aerial maps from 1988 and 1993. 9. Land use map - Zoning map. lO.MI and MIl ordinances. 11.Site plans of some Marinas. 12.RPPW Master Plan studies. 13.Listing of properties that have Trustee permits for docks,bulkheads,jetties groins and houses. 14.List of moorings. ,'. . . . Erosion List of available data 1. Natural Erosion Protective Features (Inventory-General Town wide). 2. Dredging information. 3. FEMA - maps and regulations. 4.' Ordinances for bluff and wetland setbacks. 5. LWRP Policy 12 - Natural Erosion Protective Features. 6. LWRP Policy 15 - Waterfront Fortifications. 7. The Failure of Goldsmith Jetty. 8. Aerial maps of Southold - 1988 and 1993. 9. Listing of properties that have Trustee permits - docks,bulkheads,jetties groins and houses. lO.Moorings. 11.Some historic data on Goldsmith's jetty. . . 723-rfr OLKO ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS. DESIGNERS 136 WEST 21 STREET NEW YORK, N.Y 10011 U.S.A. CABLE: OLKODESCON NY STEPHEN M. OLKO PRINCIPAL TELEX: 226000 ETLX UR-ATTN OLKO FAX: (212) 243-9743 TEL: (212) 645-9898 RECEIVED NOV 1 7 1994 Southold Town (I"", November 14, 1994 Ms. Judith T. Terry Town Clerk Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposals For: 1. Harbor Management Plan 2. Erosion Management Plan Dear Ms. Terry, Thank you for inviting us to submit two proposals to the town of Southold, to develop 1) A Harbor Management Plan and 2) An Erosion Management Plan. Unfortunately, because of other commitments, we will not be able to complete either study by the March 31, 1995 deadline. Thank you for contacting us. Hopefully, our schedules will mesh better on some other, future project. Sincerely, ~1lta/J; S.M. Olko Il~GROUP · ~~77J Holzmacher, Mclendon & Murrell, P.c. . IUM Associates, Inc. H2M Constrnction Management, Inc. . H2M Ubs, Inc. O ACEC Member ; . ':'1 Supporting Excellence .,,' In Engineering 575 Broad Hollow Road, Melville, NY 11747-5076 (516) 756-8000 . Fax, (516) 694-4122 November 16, 1994 RECEIVED NOV 1 7 1994 Ms. Jud~h T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 South"l..! T "wn ("I"r~ RE: Request for Proposal for Consulling Services to Develop a Harbor Management Plan. Dear Ms. Terry: After reviewing the documents regarding the above referenced project we are unable to subm~ a proposal at this time. We appreciate having had the opportun~y to subm~ a proposal and would be most interested in being considered for future projects w~h the Town of Southold. Very truly yours, HO~MACHER, McL:NDON f MURRELL, P.C. fflUw{d1l G ~{!lMf/ Rosemarie Scuro (~~ Proposals Manager lln RS:ppt ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS PLANNERS CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS SURVEYORS c i,( , LEGAL NOTA' .REQUESTF?JP PROPOSALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of South old isRe- questing Proposals for con- sulting services to develop a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold to provide a comprehensive ex- amination of all surface waters within or adjacent to the Town and identify and address the problems of conflict, conges- tion, and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands. Proposal Specifications may be obtained from Judith Terry, Southold Town Clerk, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold,NeWYork II97I,dur- ing regular business hours. It is the responsibility of each proposal, before submitting a Proposal, to examine the speci- fications and to reflect the in- formation contained therein in the Proposal. Proposals shall be submit- ted in a narrative format, de- scribing the work to be per- formed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule showing the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the performance of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the fum and its prin- cipals and a list of references showing the satisfactory per- formance of similar jobs. All Requests for Proposals must be signed and sealed in envelopes plainly marked "Re- quest for Proposal - Harbor Management Plan", and sub- mitted to the Office of the Town Clerk, RFP's will be received by the Town Clerk until read aloud in public. Proposals shall not be qualified, modified, limited or restricted in any way. Incom- plete proposals .will not be con- . sidered. A pre-submission confer- ence will be held on November 17,1994 at 10:00 A.M., at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Dated: November I, 1994 JUDITH T. TERRY SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK lx-l 1110/94 . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Pat.ricia Wood, being duly sworn, says t.hat she is the Editor, of the TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold. in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy. has been published in said Traveler-Watchman once each week for / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . weeks succ~ivelY. commencing ..If........ r ~.~' ....)l~Q.......... ~.........L(...-:-... ..... on the Sw~n to before me on ...I4....day of this IJ~ .......................................... , ''If .19. .. L2, a-d~ ..........~................. Notary Public BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER NOTARY PUBLIC, Stale of Hew York No. 4806846 Qualified in Suffolk CoanIy Commission Expires r /3,/96 STATE OF NEW YORK) ss: COUNTY OF SUFFOIJ{ ) ~hn wem... of Mattltuck, In said Cono~, being duly sworn, lIllYll that he/she Is PrIncipal Clerk of THE SUFFOIJ{ TIMES, a Weekly Newspaper, published at Mattltuck, In the Town of Southold, Conoly of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed Is a printed copy, bas been regularly ~ed In said Newspaper once each week for weeks ~txrm;;Jr on the day of ,r--- ~_~;t NcmcE IS dtVI!Iof tIlaI lbeTowD Board of the Town of Soulhold is Ileq....ua. Propouls far -... _ to ......... . Barbor'M__...t Pbm for Ihe Town of SouIhoId to provide s com- prebeasive Il'!dininarif'll\ of all swfacc _ within or adjacent to Ihe Town lIIll\ idOotify .... _so Ihe problems of ccioruct. _Doo, and co~- lion for space in the use of harbors, surface wa_ and underwater lands. Proposal Specifications may be obtained from Judilh Tetr)', Souchold Town Cieri<, Town Hall, 53095 Mmo Road, Soulhold, New Yo,k 11971. during regular business hours. It is the responsibility of each proposer. ~ befOre submittiog a Proposal, to ex- amine _ specificatiofts and to reflect the infonnation contained therein in Ihe Proposai. Proposals shall be submitted in a nsnative fonDal, describing Ihe work to be perfonncd. the estimated time to perfonn such work. and a rate sched- ule showing the hourly rates for the work. together with a maximum price for Ihe perfonoance of each task. The proposal shall aJso include a resume oflhe fum and its principals and a list of .-eferen<;es showing Ihe satiSfactory perfaImJitce, of simiIarjobs. . All Requests for Proposals must be ~... sealed in envelopeS plainly marked --Request for Proposal - llarher Management Plan", and submitted to the Office of the Town Clerk. RFP's will be received by the Town Clerk until 10:00 A.M., Tuesday, Decem.ber 6, 1994, at which time they will be opened and read aloud in public. Proposals shall 001 be qualified, mudified, limited or restricted in any way. Incomplete pro- posals will DOl be considmd. A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17, 1994 at 10:00 A.M.. at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Roae( Southold, New York 11971. - Dated: November I, 1994. JUDITHT. TERRY SOU1HOLD TOWN CLERK 8137-ITNIO Principal Oerk Notary Publlc Sworn day of . . . 77i3- m TAMS November 11, 1994 Ms. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 aKEI'ItO ~OV '\ 4 1004 .~nl'~ \ '-.,:; ;'''h{1.t )(.';' 1""~'.' ' .,... RE: RFP in Local Erosion Management Plan RFP for Harlem Management Plan Dear Ms. Terry: Thank you for sending the referenced RFPs to TAMS Consultants, Inc. We are not in a position to respond to these particular RFPs at this time. We would appreciate, however, being kept on your mailing list in case future opportunities arise. Yours truly, TAMS Consultants, Inc. ~ n., Crt4Jl-~ Karen M. cOghlan-' Department Head Marketing Services TAMS Consultants, IDe. The TAMS Building 655 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017 (212) 867-1777 Fax (212) 697-6354 Telex ITT 422188 . . 7l!3 - /77- TAMS November 11, 1994 Ms. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RECENtD . A 094 NOV 1 '-i L ,-(" J~'\~\\~~ ',:; . -\" 1\ RE: RFP in Local Erosion Management Plan RFP for Harlem Management Plan Dear Ms. Terry: Thank you for sending the referenced RFPs to TAMS consultants, Inc. We are not in a position to respond to these particular RFPs at this time. We would appreciate, however, being kept on your mailing list in case future opportunities arise. Yours truly, TAMS Consultants, Inc. t.~'V" 1'1), Co-~~~ Karen M. Coghlan I Department Head Marketing Services TAMS Consultants, Inc. The TAMS Building 655 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017 (212) 867-1777 Fax (212) 697-6354 Telex ITT 422188 .NOU. -1994 15:40 FROM . TO 8-90~167651823 P.01 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF COASTAL RESOURCES AND WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION 162 WASHINGTON AVENUE . ALBANY, NEW YORK 12231 Phone: (518) 474-6000 FAX: (518) 473-2464 FAX MESSAGE TO: Ruth Oliva FROM: Steve Ridler DATE: November 9,1994 MESSAGE: Here are two more consultants, they should receive the harbor management RFP. I should be able to send you some more soon. Number of sh.... (Uleluding eover page): 1- If then is a queotiOD or probl..... call: Steve Ridler at (518) 474-6000 NOU~-1994 15:40 FROM FROM: URBAN HARBORS lNST. .0: TO B-90~167651B23 P.02 NOU P'1994 9:28AM 11'318 P.01 <URBAN HARBORS INSTITUTE Fax: Telephone: (617)287-5575 (617)287-5570 FAX ANNOUNCEMENT DATE: November 8, 1994 TO: Steve Ridler FAX NO: (Sl~)473-2464 FROM: Jack Wiggin NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: 0 COMMENTS: l>rivate consultants with harbor planning experience: Jack Meuee Appledore Engineering 600 Stale Street, Suite D Portsmouth, NH 03801 Horsley Witten, Inc. 3179 Main Street P.O. Box 7 Barnstable, MA 02630 I'm looking into others and will send them along. TOTAL P.02 "~~.-"'J..rT "'".~ '1"-11-' . ~ ~II~ ~~~.~"'~ . . .....'" NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF COASTAL RFSOURCES AND WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION 162 WASHINGTON AVENUE ALBANY, NEW YORK 12231 Phone: (518) 474-6000 FAX: (518) 473-2464 FAX.MESSAGE TO: Ruth Oliva FROM: Steve Ridler DATE: November 3, 1994 ME$SAGE: Here are two mlllmllg 1ists for erosion and harbor mRnllgement, as you can . see there are many consultants poteutially <:ould do both.projects (or at least should be sufficiently intereSted to receive both RFPs). Some of the addresses are pn:tty old and some companies may not exist or have changed their addresses - so do not be sUIprised if you get some returns. I have not mllnllged to get a response from the coastal programs in Connecti.cut, Rhode IsJand and Massachusetts - hopefully they will get . back to me tomorrow with some consultants they have used. If so I will pass these on. I will be arranging for the completion of the gIlII1t contracts tomorrow. Numb<<" of ""_ (iDcluclia& eova- pogo): S If d1ere is a queoriOJl 01" problem, call: Steve RidIer.. (518) 474-6000 NGV-03-1994 17:01 FROM . TO 8-90077~167651823 P.02 Tbis is the mllllillf list for the Harbor Managemeat RFP, those marked with au .. may be able to do the Local ElvsiOD Management Program. Olko Engineering .. 136 We5t 21 Street New York, NY 10011 Geoffrey B. Steadman 345 North Main St WeslpOrt, cr 06880 SaratOga Associates .. 443 Broadway Saratoga. NY 12866 A1TN: Brian McMahon Bagdon Enviromnental Associates .. 3 NOllllanskill Blvd Dell1iar.NYI2054 A1TN: Mark Bagdon Buckhurst, Fish, Hutton, Katz .. 72 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10011 Carr, Lynch Associates .. 1385 Cambrdge Street Cambridge. MA 02139 Sasaki Associates, loc. .. 64 Pleasant Street Watertown, MA 02172 Fredericll: P. Clark Associates, Ine: 350 Theodore Friend Avenue Rye, NY 10S80 The LA Group, Ine: : /J/h/jd. 468 Broadway v'- Saratoga Spr" Baystate Enviromnental Consultants, Ine: .. 296 North Main Street East Longmeadow, MA 01028 Clough Harbor Associates .. m Winners Cicle PO Box 5269 Alabany, NY 12205.5269 Cashin Associates, PC .. 1200 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Iohn D.M. Luttman -Iohnson, P.E. Consortium .. Total Marine Concepts, Ine:. 150 Front Street - Suite 203 Mill Wharf Plaza Scituate, MA 02066 Arthur D. Little, Inc: .. Ac:om Park ClID1bridge, MA 02140-2390 Fort Point Associates .. 300 CoIIgress Street Boston, MA 02210 Albertson, Sharp, Ew~, ~. .. ~ _ 17 North Avenue ~ Norwalk, CT 06851 DI Cesare - Bentley Engineers, lne:. .. Century Professional Centec 100 Fort Hill Road Groton, CT 06340 Gruber, Kirshen and As PO Boll. 710 Brewerton, NY 13029 OPK 101 East Wat<< Street PO Box 29 Syrac:use, NY 13201 CE Maguire, Ine: .. One Court Street New Britain cr 06501 Fred Hart Associates ~ _ ,--I' . 530 5th Avenue ~~ ~ New York, NY l0036r""'~" rT 1...........~.1.='='.... .1.r.~.1. l""l'Ii:un . Beyer, Blinder, Belle * Architecls and Planners 41 East 11th Street New York, NY 1003 TAMS Consulting, Inc: * The TAMS Building 655 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017 Fay, Spofford and Tho 6 St. James Avenue Boston, MA 02116 Coastal Consultants * PO Box 1149 Madison Square Station New York, NY 10159 CT Male Associates * PO Box 727 50 Century Drive Latham, NY 12110 Manuel S. Emanuel Associates * 50 Piermont Avenue PO Box 832 Nyack, NY 10960 r Environmental Design and Research, P.C. * 6007 Fair Lakes Drive. Suite 300 Syracuse, NY 13057 Inter-Science Research Associates, Inc. * PO Box 1201 36 Nugent Street Southampton, NY 11969 Natchez: & Associates 916 East Boston Post Road Mamaroneck, NY 10543 Ocean and Coastal Consultants, Inc. * 35 Corporate Drive Trumbull, CT 06611 Peconic Associates, Inc. One Bootleg Alley PO Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 ,u C-~f~~.1.CrC~~C~~ r.",-, 'NOV-03-1994 17'01 FROM . TO 8-9~5167651823 P.04 TIJis'is the list or coosulCan1S ror the Local Ea-osiOD Managemeat Prvgram, tho5e IIJlII'bd with an $ ~ be able to do the IIaI'tlor MaugemeDl Program: Gary A. Rozmus * Senior Vi<:e President &Ier Associates 480 Forest Avenue Locust Valley, NY 11560 Mr. Robert V. Wood Vi<:e President Gibbs &. Hill, Inc. 11 PemI Plaza New York, NY 10001 Mr. James W. Ford, P.E. · Partner Storch Associates 30 Jericho Eltecutive Plaza Jericho, NY 11753 Mr. Roger C. Wilhelm, P.E. . Vi<:e' President Roy F. Weston, Inc. I Old Country Road, Suite 430 Carle' Place, NY 11514 Mr. Donald A. Sioss. P.E. * . Vi<:e President H2M Group 575 Broad Hollow Road Melville, NY 11747 Mr. Norman H. Bewnel * Coastal Planning &. Bogineering, Inc. 2481 NW Boca Ratan Blvd. Boca Ratan, F'L 33431 Mr. John C. Hennillg.<on, P.E. * Vi<:e President Malcolm Pirnie 2 Corporate Park Drive, Box 751 White Plains, NY 1060Z-()751 Mr. Ethan C. Eldon · President Ethan C. Eldon Associates, Inc. 900 Ellison Avenue Ewstbury, NY 11590 Ms. Leslie Fields * Aubrey Consulting Suite 2-3 350 Gifford Street Falmouth, MA 02S40 Mr. Erik 1. Olsen · Olsen AsSociates 4438 Herschel Street Jachsonville, F'L 32210 Mr. lohn Robson * Vice President Greenman Pedersen, Inc. 325 West Main Street Babylon, NY 11702 Ms. Karen Chadwick $ Ecologistics Limited 490 Dutton Drive Sui1c Al Waterloo Ontario Canada N2L 6H7 Mr. Louis Saulino, P.E. * President Maguire Group 3237 Route 112 Medford, NY 11763 Dr. Paul W. Grosser, Ph.D., P.E. * President P. W. Grosser Consulting P.O. Box 39 Sayville, NY 11782-8705 Ms. Jane Rubenstein * President Rubenstein Environmenta1, Inc. 4 Welder Court Huntington Station, NY 11746 Mr. Gregory T; Greene Director of Environmeota1 Programs , Chashin Associates, P.C. ~ .ae.. d_ lli Jh~udw~ 9f~..6 ItfltJt:J,~ . '~--(j . -Pla;....;~w, NY ll'6~t~ '11f/. II,//;!~~~ . ~aJ-03-1994 17:02 FROM . Mr. Curtis F. Velser, Jr., R.L.A. * Associate Camp, Dresser & McKee 100 Crossways Park North Woodbury, NY 11797 Mr. Philip C. Sears * Vice President Allee, King, Rosen & Fleming Inc. 117 East 29th Street New York, NY 10016 Dr. Rutherford Platt Dept. of Geography U nivcrsity of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01002 URS Consultants '" Mack Centre II Mack Centre Drive Paramus, NJ 07652 Dr. Mark Byrnes Coastal Studies Inst. 332 Howe-Russel Geosci Complelt Baton Rouge, LA 70803 Dr. Henry Bokuniewicz Marine Sciences Research Center SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 11790 Mr. Aram Terchunian First Coastal Colp. P.O. Box 1212 Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Mr. Timothy Kana '" Coastal Science & Engineering Inc. P.O. Box 8056 Columbia, SC 29202 Applied Technolgy & Management, Inc. * P.O. Box 20336 Charleston, SC 29413 TO 8-900779-5167651823 . P.05 TOTRL P.05 . . STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) III JUDITH T. TERRY, Town Clerk of the Town of Southold, New York, ! being duly sworn, says that on the 4th day of November 1994, I! she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, II in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town I' of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin I Board, Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. I I I I ,I I I Legal Notice, Request for Proposals for consulting services to develop a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold. RFP's due 10:00 A.M., Tuesday, December 6, 1994. ~J-'~_ tY Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Sworn to before me this 4th day of November ,1994. ~ hv. CU~ Notary Public JOYCE M. WILKINS Notary Public. State of New York No. 4952246, Suffolk Co~n~. ./ Term Expires June 12. 1 '> P" / ( <...P'. , ' r ~ f;? __ iv:' / jV(~H-1 _ v 1_ \ ( Jjz1;i 4 ~~ . ~jl - - ./ . ../, /~ ~c/{~f ;/ ,/ ~-rL-- II LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold is Requesting Proposals for consulting services to develop a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold to provide a comprehensive examination of all surface waters within or adjacent to the Town and identify and address the problems of conflict, congestion, and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands. Proposal Specifications may be obtained from Judith Terry, Southold Town Clerk, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, during regular business hours. It is the responsibility of each proposer, before submitting a Proposal, to examine the specifications and to reflect the information contained therein in the Proposal. Proposals shall be submitted in a narrative format, describing the work to be performed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule showing the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the performance of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the firm and its principals and a list of references showing the satisfactory performance of similar jobs. All Requests for Proposals must be signed and sealed in envelopes plainly marked "Request for Proposal - Harbor Management Plan", and submitted to the Office of the Town Clerk. RFP's will be received by the Town Clerk until 10:00 A.M., Tuesday, December 6, 19911, at which time they will be opened and read aloud in public. Proposals shall not be qualified, modified, limited or restricted in any way. Incomplete proposals will not be considered. A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17, 1994 at 10:00 A.M., at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Dated: November 1, 1994. JUDITH T. TERRY SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK * * * . Page 2 - Harbor Management Plan ~ . PLEASE PUBLISH ON NOVEMBER 10. 1991l, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL. P.O. BOX 1179, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971. Copies to the following: The Suffolk Times The Traveler-Watchman Town Board Members Town Attorney Town Clerk's Bulletin Board ~. :ceu?i: ;h; fed .,_____t:=ia 'i-Cti~'L--- LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold is Requesting Proposals for consulting services to develop a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold to provide a comprehensive examination of all surface waters within or adjacent to the Town and identify and address the problems of conflict, congestion, and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands. Proposal Specifications may be obtained from Judith Terry, Southold Town Clerk, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, during regular business hours. It is the responsibility of each proposer, before submitting a Proposal, to examine the specifications and to reflect the information contained therein in the Proposal. Proposals shall be submitted in a narrative format, describing the work to be performed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule showing the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the performance of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the firm and its principals and a list of references showing the satisfactory performance of similar jobs. All Requests for Proposals must be signed and sealed in envelopes plainly marked "Request for Proposal - Harbor Management Plan", and submitted to the Office of the Town Clerk. RFP's will be received by the Town Clerk until 10:00 A.M., Tuesday, December 6, 1994, at which time they will be opened and read aloud in public. Proposals shall not be qualified, modified, limited or restricted in any way. Incomplete proposals will not be considered. A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17, 1994 at 10:00 A.M., at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Dated: November 1, 1994. JUDITH T. TERRY SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK * * * . . Page 2 - Harbor Management Plan PLEASE PUBLISH ON NOVEMBER 10, 1994, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH TERRY, TOWN CLERK, TOWN HALL, P.O. BOX 1179, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971. Copies to the following: The Suffolk Times The Traveler-Watchman Town Board Members Town Attorney Town Clerk's Bulletin Board "! . . LEGAL NOTICE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town Board of the Town of Southold is Requesting Proposals for consulting services to develop a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold to provide a comprehensive examination of all surface waters within or adjacent to the Town and identify and address the problems of conflict, congestion, and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands. Proposal Specifications may be obtained from Judith Terry, Southold Town Clerk, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971, during regular business hours. It is the responsibility of each proposer, before submitting a Proposal, to examine the specifications and to reflect the information contained therein in the Proposal. Proposals shall be submitted in a narrative format, describing the work to be performed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule showing the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the performance of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the firm and its principals and a list of references showing the satisfactory performance of similar jobs. All Requests for Proposals must be signed and sealed in envelopes plainly marked "Request for Proposal - Harbor Management Plan", and submitted to the Office of the Town Clerk. RFP's will be received by the Town Clerk until 10:00 A.M., Tuesday, December 6, 19911, at which time they will be opened and read aloud in public. Proposals shall not be qualified, modified, limited or restricted in any way. Incomplete proposals will not be considered. A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17, 1994 at 10:00 A.M., at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Dated: November 1, 1994. JUDITH T. TERRY SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK * * * . . Page 2 - Harbor Management Plan PLEASE PUBLISH ON NOVEMBER 10. 19911, AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION TO JUDITH TERRY, TOWN CLERK. TOWN HALL. P.O. BOX 1179. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971. Copies to the following: The Suffolk Times The Traveler-Watchman Town Board Members Town Attorney Town Clerk's Bulletin Board . . PART I SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE To develop a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold to provide a comprehensive examination of all surface waters within or adjacent to the Town of Southold and identify and address the problems of conflict, congestion, and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands, as further provided herein. 2.0 SCHEDULE The schedule below is an estimate of the time period leading up to the commencement of the Agreement. Its intent is to provide each Proposer with an idea of when certain events may occur. The dates given are guidelines and should not be construed as firm dates or deadlines due to the multiple parties involved in the decision-making process. EVENT DATE Advertising for proposals Pre-submission conference Proposal Opening Town Board Approval Agreement Executed Operations Commencement November 10, 199~ November 17, 199~ at 10 a.m. December 6, 199~ at 10 a.m. December 13, 199~ before December 23, 199~ December 26, 199~ 3.0 EXAMINATION OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS AND FAMILIARITY WITH WORK It is the responsibility of each Proposer before submitting a Proposal to examine the specifications herein and notify the Town Clerk of all conflicts, errors or discrepancies in the Proposal Specifications. Proposals shall be expected to reflect the information contained in these specifications. A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17, 199~ at 10 a.m. at: Town Hall Conference Room 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 . . 1l.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT Proposals shall be submitted in a narrative format, describing the work to be performed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule showing the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the performance of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the firm and its principals and a list of references showing the satisfactory performance of similar jobs, as more specifically described in Part II, Section 5 of these specifications, entitled Proposal Requirements. PROPOSALS SHALL NOT BE QUALIFIED, MODIFIED, LIMITED OR RESTRICTED IN ANY WAY. Incomplete proposals will not be considered. The proposals shall be submitted to the Office of the Town Clerk, Town of Southold, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, 11971, prior to 10 a.m. on December 6, 1991l. Each proposer shall submit seven (7) separate complete sets of his Proposal which shall be enclosed in a sealed opaque envelope plainly marked on the outside with the title of the work and the name and address of the Proposalder. No Proposal will be considered unless filed on or before the time and at the place designated in the Notice to Proposers. Proposals received after the time set for the opening will be returned to Proposers unopened. Any Proposer may withdraw its Proposal upon receipt of a properly notarized written request made no later than the time set for Proposal opening. No alterations to these Proposal Specification will be considered valid unless in writing and issued as Addenda. All questions must be received at least ten (10) calendar days before proposal opening in order to be answered. All addenda will be on file at the Town Clerk's office at least twenty-four (21l) hours before proposals are opened. The Town will not be bound by oral clarifications. Each Proposal must be accompanied by a Proposal guaranty in the sum of ten percent of the proposal price. No proposal will be considered unless it is accompanied by the required guaranty. The proposal bond shall name the Town as the obligee. The proposal guaranty shall ensure the execution of the agreement and the furnishing of the required bonds and insurance by the successful Proposer, as specified in these specifications. 5.0 EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT The successful Proposer, or its legally authorized representative, shall be required to appear in person within ten (10) days of the Notice of Award by the Town at the place and time designated by the Town to execute the Agreement. 6.0 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS The Town of Southold reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals if such action is deemed to be in the best interests of the Town. Proposals will be evaluated as specified in Part II, Section 5 of these specifications entitled Proposal Requirements. . . 7.0 PAYMENTS The town will pay the contractor upon final submission of the Town of the Final Draft Harbor Management Plan in a form satisfactory to the Town Board. The Town shall be entitled to deduct from any payment owing to Contractor any sums expended by the Town to cure any default or other non-compliance by Contractor. 8.0 DEFAULT In the event the Contractor fails to perform its obligations under the Agreement, the Town may terminate such Agreement and the Town may procure the services from other sources and hold the Contractor responsible for any excess costs incurred and deduct from payments owing to the Contractor and/or draw upon the Performance Bond as full or partial reimbursement of such excess costs. The Town reserves the right to terminate the Agreement for just cause. . . NOTICE TO PROPOSERS The Town of Southold will receive sealed proposals for preparation of a draft Southold Harbor Management. Plan. The proposals will be received until the time and at the location herein specified which will then be opened and publicly read aloud: PLACE: Office of the Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1800 DATE: TIME: Tuesday, December 6, 199~ 10:00 AM EDST (LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE OPENED) Proposals must include a narrative setting forth a work program for preparing a Harbor Management Plan and delivering necessary data, as well as information on experience and references. Upon payment of non-refundable fifty dollars ($50.00) Proposal Solicitation may be picked up at: Office of the Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Judith T. Terry Town Clerk . . PART II TOWN OF SOUTIlOLD HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN November 1, 1994 WORK SPECIFICATIONS 1. Description Background: The Town of Southold is requesting proposals from qualified consultants for the development of a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold. A harbor management plan addresses the problems of conflict, congestion and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands. The finished product will be used to complete the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). The importance of harbor management has become clear in recent years, as the dramatic increase in the popularity of recreational boating and changes in the use of harbors has resulted in competition for space within and along the shores of the State's harbors and nearshore waters. Conflicts have increased between recreational users of harbors and waters, between recreational and commercial activities and between all uses and natural and cultural resources. These conflicts and a lack of clear authority to solve them has resulted in degraded natural and cultural characteristics of many harbors, and their ability to support a range of appropriate uses. In order to resolve these issues, Chapter 79 I of the Laws of 1992 was enacted, amending Article 42 of the Executive Law (Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resources Act) to provide local governments with the clear authority to comprehensively manage activities in harbor and nearshore areas by developing comprehensive harbor management plans and laws to implement those plans. This is outlined in amendments to 19 NYCRR Part 601 which contains procedures for the development and approval of harbor management plans and have formed the basis for the development of this RFP. The harbor management plan will be part of the Town's LWRP. The Town has been working on its L WRP for a number of years and is now concentrating on its completion. The focus of the L WRP is on protecting the coastal environment and enhancing recreational access to it. In order to complete an approvable L WRP, the Town of Southold and the Department of State have identified the need develop a town wide harbor management plan. The Town and the Department of State have also identified the need to focus on two issues. These are a town wide marina study and a detailed examination of the Mattituck Inlet. In 1994 the New York State Department of State produced the Draft Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program. This detailed study of the Sound resulted in the development of regional coastal policies, refining the State policies to reflect the issues and conditions of the Long Island Sound region, and the proposal of a series of Special Management Areas. The Regional Policies that consider harbor management issues will be applied in the preparation of the harbor management plan for the Town of Southold. The Regional Program identified that Mattituck Inlet be designated a Maritime Center. These have been identified as the most suitable locations for new or expansion of existing water-dependent commercial and industrial uses on the Sound. The Department of State further recommended the development of harbor management plans for the proposed Maritime Centers. Mattituck Inlet is Southold's only active harbor on Long Island Sound. It is the easternmost soundfront deepwater port of call on Long Island that is open to commercial fishing boats and transient recreational . . boaters. The Inlet has been the focus of the Town's attention since 1980, when the Mattituck Inlet Advisory Committee was appointed to focus on concerns about the declining ecological health of the Inlet. Their inventory and analysis work, contained in the Watershed Study of Mattituck Creek, led to specific recommendations that were never adopted by the Town. Task: Develop a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold to provide a comprehensive examination of all surface waters within or adjacent to the Town of Southold and identify and address the problems of conflict, congestion, and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands. It will examine both town wide and geographically specific issues and provide recommendations for harbor management opportunities. These will provide guidance in managing boat traffic, general harbor uses, optimum location and number of boat support structures such as docks, piers, moorings, pump-out facilities, and special anchorage areas, and identification of local and federal navigation channels. Examine existing harbor management regulations at the federal, State and local levels and present town wide and geographic specific harbor management recommendations. The Harbor Management Plan will identify discrete harbor management units located within the Town and provide various alternatives for optimum waterfront and harbor use, while at the same time analyzing probable environmental effects of these alternatives. The Harbor Management Plan will highlight two main issues for immediate attention: an inventory and analysis of marinas in the Town of Southold the preparation of a detailed unit Harbor Management Plan for Mattituck Inlet Organization: The preparation of the Harbor Management Plan will be developed by a consultant under the guidance of a subcommittee of the Town's Waterfront Advisory Committee and coordinated by the Town's Planning Department. Technical assistance will be available from the New York State Department of State. Project cost: A maximum of $25,000 is available for this project through the New York State Environmental Protection Fund. 2. Study Area The study area is the marine waters within the Town of Southold or abounding the Town of Southold to a distance of fifteen hundred feet from the shore, whichever is greater. This includes in-water areas adjacent to open shorelines as well as actively used enclosed bays or harbors and associated uplands. The study area has been split into 10 shoreline reaches, developed by the Town of Southold as part of their Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. There are 4 reaches along the Long Island Sound, 5 reaches along the bays, and the shoreline of Fishers Island. Emphasis will be placed on harbor management issues within Mattituck Inlet, located within Reach I. 3. Performance Standards The final report shall contain the completed Harbor Management Plan for the study area and a detailed unit Harbor Management Plan for Mattituck Inlet, with all of the products listed in Section 4, 2 . . Deliverables, as a minimum. The final report should also include a discussion of the methodology used, reference all sources of information, and identify any information gaps and issues requiring further study. This final report shall incorporate and respond to the comments from the draft report provided by the Department of State and the Town of Southold. The consultant will be required to attend two public meetings organized by the Town to provide the opportunity to highlight local concerns on harbor management issues and for public comment on the draft document. The report shall be prepared using WordPerfect 5.1. Map products and tabular data shall be prepared using the guidelines in Attachment 3. 4. Deliverables A. A draft Harbor MlllUlgement programfor the Town ofSouthold containing thefollowlng elements: (i) Identification of the Harbor Management boundary area. This shall be supplemented with a map of the Harbor Management study area depicting the boundary for the study area. (ii) An inventory and analysis of by reach of the existing uses of the surface water area and adjacent uplands that are relevant to the use and management of surface waters and underwater lands, natural and cultural features and conditions in this area. The Consultant will work closely with the Town of Southold to develop the inventory and analysis. For each reach, the inventory and analysis should address the following considerations: a. The location and extent of, where applicable: commercial shipping recreational boating* dry rack storage commercial and recreational fishing and shell fishing aquaculture and mariculture waste management mineral extraction dredging and deposition of dredge spoil Andros Patent Lands public access recreation habitats and other natural resource protection water quality open space aesthetic values water dependent uses common law riparian or littoral rights public interests, including interests under the Public Trust Doctrine other uses and circumstances determined to be significant by the Town. This shall be supplemented with a map for each reach depicting the boundary for the study area and identifying the existing uses of the surface water area and 3 . . adjacent uplands that are relevant to the use and management of surface waters and underwater lands, natural and cultural features and conditions in this area. * This stage of the inventory and analysis should include a survey of marinas located in the Town of Southold as detailed in Attachment I. b. Identification and discussion of conflict and competition for space among the uses and users of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands. c. Identification and discussion of conditions which operate as constraints on utilization of underwater lands and navigable waters by the public. d. Identification and discussion of issues of regional and local importance. Identify regional needs for any of the various uses or users likely to be attracted to the particular qualities of the area. e. Discussion of existing regulation of the construction, size and location of wharves,docks, moorings, piers, jetties, platforms, breakwaters, or other structures, whether temporary or permanent. f. Discussion of opportunities, long and short term goals and objectives. Identification and discussion of economic, cultural and social considerations fundamental to responsible management of underwater lands and navigable waters. g. Identification of discrete harbor management units for which specific policies, recommendations and implementation measures could be developed in subsequent harbor management plans. (iii) A water use plan that provides a rational basis for the allocation and use of space within the harbors and nearshore areas of the Town of Southold, effectively zoning surface water areas and underwater lands for specific uses or a range of specific uses in order to avoid conflicts or improve conditions within harbor or nearshore areas. The water use plan shall include: a. A plan that addresses the allocation and use of space within the harbors and nearshore areas of the study area. This plan should address, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: navigation channels fairways open water areas mooring areas and allocation procedures anchorage areas dredging and deposition of dredge spoil boat launches marinas marine structures dry rack storage 4 . . sanitary facilities fuel storage parking and traffic circulation water dependent uses associated upland uses This shall be supplemented with a proposed water use map for each reach depicting the boundary of the study area and the harbor management units and identifying the proposed uses of the surface water area and underwater lands in the study area. The map should also identify proposed capital improvement projects and areas of specific regulation. b. Specification of policies concerning present and future use and management of the study area. The consultant will work closely with the Department of State to apply regional coastal policies on harbor management. c. Identification of capital projects necessary to implement the Harbor Management Plan. d. Specification of existing and proposed techniques and authorities to implement the Harbor Management Plan. (iv) The preparation of a detailed Harbor Management Program for Mattituck Inlet. This plan will facilitate the optimum utilization of Mattituck Inlet as a working harbor and Maritime Center, while also improving the Inlet's surface water quality, enhancing natural productivity and protecting its ecological integrity. The consultant will work closely with the Department of State in the preparation of this detailed harbor management plan. Initial inventory and analysis of Mattituck Creek was undertaken as part of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program. This is included as Attachment B and provides the framework for this task. This plan will serve as a model for further Harbor Management Plans within the Town. This plan should be supplemented by detailed maps of the Inlet, depicting: the boundary for the study area and identifying the existing uses of the surface water area and adjacent uplands that are relevant to the use and management of surface waters and underwater lands, natural and cultural features and conditions in this area. the boundary of the study area and identifying the proposed uses of the surface water area and underwater lands in the study area. The map should also identify proposed capital improvement projects and areas of specific regulation. B. Five final repon copies including comments from the draft repon provided by the Depanment of State and the Town of South old, and a 3.5" floppy disk containing the repon in WordPerfect 5.1 format. 5. Proposal Requirements 5 . . Each proposal received will be carefully evaluated for its technical merit. The following items must be addressed in the proposal. Those proposals which most satisfactorily address the following items will be considered in the final selection: A. A work program for performing the Harbor Management Plan based on the performance standards set forth in Section 3, Performance Standards, and provisions for delivering all data products listed in Section 4, Deliverables as a minimum. Work program should show the Contractor's ability to provide the necessary products and meet the deadlines for delivery described in Section 4, Deliverables. Work program should also discuss the methodology and specify sources of information for performing the Harbor Management Plan. B. Your firm's ability to perform the required services. Names, titles, qualifications, and relative contribution of all the individuals who will be providing their services should be given for evaluation. Indicate how their combined qualifications/assignments enable them to competently complete the work. Your firm's direct experience with harbor management planning should be presented . 6. Schedule of Work The following schedule of major milestones and accompanying completion dates shall be maintained in developing the Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold. MAJOR MILESTONE: Issue Request For Proposal Proposal Due Date Proposal Review and Selection Contract Award Date Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Work Program Public Meeting # I Draft Inventory and Analysis Public Meeting # 2 Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Draft Report Final Draft Harbor Management Plan 6 DUE DATE: 11/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 03/95 03/95 03/95 03/31/95 . . ATI'ACHMENT 1: EVALUATION OF MARINAS An inventory and analysis of marinas located in the Town of Southold. The study will help to determine the appropriateness of the existing uses, and the need to expand or increase the number of marina facilities, assuring that an adequate portion of the waterfront is reserved for water-dependent uses. Marinas are defined as those facilities adjacent to water providing safe and secure mooring, berthing, or storage for boats including the functions of marinas and related ancillary structures; e.g. docks, piers, boat launching ramps, anchorages, breakwaters, channels, moorings, basins, repair service, fuel sales, rentals, and parking areas. Yacht clubs and private boat basins within subdivision developments on private and patent lands will also be considered, along with marinas, for the purposes of this study. The analysis of existing conditions should consider the following factors: A. LOCATION AND LAND USE Location on the shoreline - is it at the head or mouth of a creek or inlet or on a bay? is it appropriate to increase boat traffic and activity in this location? roning - does the site/use fit the current zoning requirements? are the roning requirements reasonable and adequate or are they in need of amendments? surrounding land uses - what land uses surround the site? what are the permitted land uses? do all existing land uses support the intent of the marine zoning districts? compatibility - is the marina compatible with the existing zoning and character of the area, with consideration being given to scale, architectural style, density and intensity of use? traditional uses - what is the development history of the marina? have water-dependent and water-enhanced uses been commonplace, since the opening of the facility? water supply and wastewater disposal - what are the sources of water supply, how is wastewater handled and how is it disposed of? marina services - what is the level of services offered at the marina (e.g. boat repair and maintenance, boat storage, boat launch and haul out, vessel winterization, boat sales, motor sales, fuel, pumpout facilities, sail making and repair, and bait shop)? are water- enhanced uses (e.g. restaurants and retail stores) associated with the marina? what are the projected demands? types of boats - what is the pattern of boat usage (e.g. recreational, transient, commercial fishing, charter/party boats)? overnight accommodations - are accommodations provided for boaters wishing to stay on their boats overnight? vehicular access to and within the site - is it adequate? is it compatible with the connecting roads/highways? what are the existing and potential trip generators? the Town Trustees operate as a "marina" owner through their regulation of moorings on Town-owned bottom - how do the Trustees operate this function? where are moorings permitted? what is the access to moorings? what are the size of boats? what are the types of moorings? could procedures be improved? B. SITE LAYOUT existing layout - what is the layout and design of permanent and temporary uses on the site? are additional parcels leased or used by the marina? expansion potential - is there additional land area available for facility expansion? does the current zoning enable appropriate expansion? how practical or appropriate would it be for the marina to expand? 7 . . parking - what is the number of dedicated parking spaces? is there a further breakdown, with regard to the # of spaces associated with a specific use? is the ratio of spaces sufficient to meet the demand of the facility? are transportation alternatives available which would effectively reduce the demand for additional parking? is off-site parking a viable option? boat storage - what types of boat storage are available (e.g. in-water, upland storage, dry rack)? boat maintenance areas - are they present? are they designed in such a way that all maintenance activities can be accomplished over dry land and under roofs? are water quality mitigation measures employed? shoreline protection structures - approximately how much of the marina's shoreline has been bulkheaded? what material is used? C. DOCKS AND STRUCTURES IN WATER navigability/dredging - is navigation, adjacent to and within the confines of the marina, easily achieved? do the present locations of docks or moorings pose a problem to navigability? where, and how often, is dredging performed? is the dredging performed by private contractors, at private expense, by the federal government, or by the County? is there a federal navigation channel? fixed vs. floating docks - what is the total number of fixed docks and floating docks, respectively, in the marina? what is the total number of dockside slips rented? length and configuration - what is the length and width of the docks in the marina? what is the general configuration? is there expansion potential? moorings - does the marina lease mooring sites? if so, where are commercial moorings located? what is the total number of moorings operated by the marina? are moorings adequate to meet current and future demands? underwater lands - who owns the underwater lands within the marina? does the Town have jurisdiction? if not, which entity has jurisdiction? D. ECOLOGY water quality - what are the water quality classifications? where are the stormwater discharge points located, if there are any present? is there a noticeable and concerted effort, to the extent feasible, to direct runoff away from adjacent waters and wetlands by site grading or other methods? what marina best management measures are employed? shellfish beds - have shellfish harvest closures occurred as a result of the proximity of the marina to the shellfish bed? has expansion of marina based activities, in the past, resulted in the closure of the bed(s)? habitats - are there habitats or other natural areas in the vicinity which could be impacted by marina activity? E. CULTURAL RESOURCES historic and archaeological resources - are there structures or sites of either historical or archaeological significance in the vicinity of the marina? visual access - from land: how visible is the water from any public point either upland or adjacent to the marina? if the public's view is impaired or blocked, what is the nature of the visual impediment? from water: what is the view of the shoreline from the water? public access - is there a provision for public access on the site? if so, where? are there public lands adjacent to the facility? 8 . . ATIACHMENT 2: MATIITUCK INLET Mattituck Inlet is located in the hamlet of Mattituck on the north shore of Long Island, in the Town of Southold, and is the only harbor on the north shore to the east of Mount Sinai Harbor. The tidal inlet is extremely narrow and approximately two miles long. The widest parts of the inlet, which are only a few hundred feet wide, are in the southern half. The inlet supports substantial vegetated tidal wetlands, shell fisheries, and a state-designated Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. It also contains a number of commercial and recreational water-dependent uses which are concentrated in three locations: at the inlet's extreme southern end; at its midpoint; and on the west shore near the northernmost end of the inlet. Residential development surrounds most of the inlet. Water-dependent uses include five marinas, commercial fishing, party and charter boats, and a transient anchorage area and two boat ramps in the extreme south end of the inlet. Most of the water-dependent uses are concentrated on the west side of the inlet. Agriculture is a major land use within the inlet's watershed. Approximately 21 acres of vacant, underutilized land, wned Marine-II (M-I1), is available for new commercial development or redevelopment on the northwest side of the inlet. This is a former industrial area which consisted of petroleum and asphalt tank farms. This area could accommodate new marinas and other recreational or commercial water-dependent uses, or a mix of uses. Sufficient space exists for upland dry rack storage of vessels and limited in-water facilities, boat ramps, and associated parking areas. WATER DEPENDENT USES Commercial Fishing and Shellfishing Facilities in the inlet support approximately 20 to 25 commercial fishing vessels. Most of these boats make daily runs, although several make extended trips. There are excellent docking facilities for commercial fishing vessels, with over 250 feet of bulkheaded dock space. One facility has a hydraulic crane for loading and unloading and, unlike most ports on the Sound, provides some gear storage space. No ice is available, and fuel facilities are deficient, requiring fuel to be brought to commercial vessels. Mechanical and engine repairs for commercial vessels are lacking, but is provided by on1:all mechanics. Unlike other ports on the Sound, Mattituck is used by transient commercial vessels from Shinnecock Inlet during the summer. Although the inlet is relatively small, it is also an extremely productive shellfish growing and commercial harvesting area, producing hard clams, soft clams, and oysters of local and regional importance. Recreation The inlet is the only harbor on the north shore east of Mount Sinai Harbor and provides long-term and transient recreational vessel anchoring, slips, and services. Five marinas in the inlet provide dockage for approximately 600 recreational vessels, and approximately 150 recreational vessels are moored throughout the inlet. The greatest single concentration of moored transient vessels (approximately 25) are located in the federally dredged anchorage area at the extreme southern end of the inlet. Two boat ramps, one owned and operated by the Mattituck Park District for district residents and the other owned by the town and for town residents, are at the south end of the inlet. A 1.3 acre parcel at the extreme northwest corner of the inlet south of the west jetty, recently acquired by the Town of Southold in 1993 using Environmental Quality Bond Act funds, is an appropriate and suitable site for a public boat ramp due to its proximity to the Sound. Two parks and beaches, which are part of the Mattituck Park District, front 9 . . Long Island Sound on both the east and west side of the inlet and are limited to use by park district residents. The park and beach on the west side abuts the inlet's west jetty at the inlet's entrance. The east park and beach abuts the inlet's east jetty and the Mattituck Inlet Wetlands Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat located south of the beach. The inlet also supports some recreational shellfishing. The state-owned wetlands and the park abutting them on the east shore provide opportunities for passive recreation such as nature study and observation. NATURAL RESOURCES Wetlands and Habitat Vegetated tidal wetlands exist throughout the inlet. The most extensive undisturbed vegetated wetlands are part of the approximately 60 acre state-designated Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat, which includes most of the open water of the inlet and its wetlands north of Mill Road. Most of the vegetated wetlands in the designated habitat are owned by the state Department of Environmental Conservation. The remainder of the underwater lands and tidal wetlands are owned by the Town of Southold. Wetlands are highly productive and support a variety of fish and wildlife within the inlet and in Long Island Sound near the inlet, including a substantial soft clam and oyster shellfishery, which is dependent on high water quality and undisturbed wetlands. Water Quality The water quality classification in the inlet is SA, and its highest assigned use standard is shellfishing. The inlet fails to meet the class SA water quality and use standards during the summer. Conditional shell fishing is allowed, however, in the winter except following a 0.2" rainfall within a 24 hour period, when coliform loadings exceed acceptable levels. Agricultural and urban nonpoint runoff within the inlet's narrow drainage basin are the primary sources of water quality and shellfish harvesting use impairments. Roadway drainage pipe discharges to the creek have been identified by the town as a source of nonpoint pollution. Water quality and use impairments are also related to large numbers of vessels in marinas and the public anchorage at the south end of the inlet. SUMMARY OF ISSUES AND PROBLEMS The issues and problems confronting Mattituck Inlet as a maritime center are summarized below and illustrated on map 20.0 Problems within the inlet and its immediate area include: limited public access to the inlet and its resources for water-dependent recreation, navigation, and shell fishing; use conflicts within the inlet; insufficient infrastructure; and substandard groundwater and surface water quality. Issues include: the need to protect and prevent the displacement of water-dependent uses within the inlet; to redevelop approximately 21 acres of vacant and underutilized waterfront land at the north end of the inlet; to improve surface water quality for shellfishing; and to maintain high value natural resources within the inlet. Commercial Water-Dependent Uses Although the existing water-dependent uses are consistent with their current M-II zoning category, the M-II district also allows non-water-dependent uses which could displace the important water-dependent uses. The displacement of docking facilities for the commercial fishing fleet would be disastrous, since the existing facilities are the only ones available in this part of the Long Island Sound region, and their loss would adversely affect the commercial fishing industry on Long Island. There is also a need to 10 . . maintain the existing marinas in the inlet to meet the demand for recreational vessel storage and servicing. There is an opportunity to facilitate the location of new water-dependent recreational facilities or a mix of water-dependent and water-enhanced uses within the existing 21-acre underutilized area at the north end of the inlet. This area is most appropriate for new water-dependent uses, such as marinas, boat yards, and boat ramps, due to its proximity to the Sound, its previously disturbed and leveled terrain, and few natural resource constraints both on and immediately off-site. This is also one of the only areas in the inlet large enough to provide sufficient buffer area between water-dependent uses and residences. Petroleum tanks have been removed; however, some remaining tanks may still contain asphalt. It is not known if the area is contaminated or in need of remediation prior to redevelopment. If these areas are redeveloped for commercial or recreational water-dependent uses, such as marinas or boat yards, remediation may not be necessary. Navigation and Access to Underwater Lands and the Foreshore New in-water structures, such as docks and bulkheads, have become prevalent throughout much of the inlet. These structures impede access along the foreshore and to underwater lands for shell fishing and other uses, and impede navigation in narrow, shallow areas. New in-water structures which adversely affect access and navigation need to be limited to the minimum necessary in order for property owners to exercise their littoral rights of access to the water, in order to prevent impairments to navigation and public access along the shore. Structures that cover large areas of underwater lands should be limited to areas adjacent to upland areas zoned for water-dependent uses, and should be limited in length so as not to interfere with navigation channels and navigation buffer areas. The anchorage at the south end of the inlet does not provide moorings for transient vessels. These vessels must use conventional anchors with greater scope than moorings. As a result, the vessels swing in large arcs and use valuable space in the basin. Vessels often anchor outside of the basin due to a lack of space. Permanent or semi- permanent moorings and tackle for transients, which are safer than conventional anchors and use a shorter scope, would result in better use of space in the basin. A greater concentration of vessels could be moored in the anchorage rather than spread out elsewhere in the inlet. Infrastructure Constraints Major new development and major expansions of existing development are constrained throughout the inlet due to the lack of a readily available potable water supply, insufficient roadway infrastructure and parking space for major expansions of existing commercial uses, and insufficient surface water area between the established navigation channel and commercial upland uses. The shallow groundwater table, which has been the area's source of potable water, has been polluted from agricultural pesticides. It is not economically feasible to extend new public water supply lines to the area. Narrow, winding residential streets surround the entire inlet, except at its extreme south end, where a major county road is within a few hundred feet of the Mattituck Park District and town boat ramps. Limited parking is available at the south end of the inlet at the boat ramps, the park and beach at the entrance to the inlet on its west side, and at the park and beach at the entrance to the inlet on its west side (all for district residents only). Little space is available for new in-water structures or uses, since the inlet is so narrow and the existing navigation channel occupies much of the inlet. Erosion and Inlet and Beach Maintenance At the entrance to the inlet, beach erosion and shoaling is a problem that needs to be resolved. Shoaling of the inlet is a hazard for large commercial and recreational vessels, and the two jetties along each side of the inlet's entrance prevent the downdrift movement of beach material, resulting in downdrift erosion of the beach on the east side of the inlet. Sand bypassing of the inlet would reduce inlet shoaling and restore the sand budget to downdrift beaches. II . . Water Quality and ShellrlShing Substandard water quality resulting from nonpoint source pollution precludes the inlet's assigned use for shell fishing during most of the year, except during cold and dry periods during the winter when there is very little runoff entering the inlet. While water quality frequently fails to meet the inlet's assigned SA water quality standards, it may be possible to improve water quality, retain the SA classification, and reopen areas within the inlet for shellfishing. This will require adequate control and treatment of stormwater and agricultural runoff using nonstructural as well as structural management practices prior to its entry into the inlet. If these improvements are effective, the standard for closures might be amended to relax the 0.2" rainfall standard to allow shellfishing more often. In addition, use conflicts between shell fishing and concentrations of vessels in marinas and mooring areas need to be minimized in order to reopen portions of the inlet to shellfishing. Some of the potential risks of vessel waste pollution may be reduced by providing sufficient pumpout or dump stations for vessel wastes and designating the inlet a vessel waste no-discharge zone, but the potential for pollution from concentrations of vessels would still exist. In order to effectively resolve these use conflicts, concentrations of vessels will have to be limited to specific areas and prohibited in areas that are most important for shellfish harvesting. SUMMARY OF OVERALL OBJECTIVES I. Protect and maintain existing water-dependent uses in their present locations and improve conditions, so that they can operate cleanly and more efficiently, and allow these uses to expand within well-defined limits. 2. Facilitate the siting of new water-dependent uses on former industrial sites at the north end of the inlet, such as at least one public boat ramp and parking area, marinas and/or boat yards with dry rack storage. Any in-water facilities would be limited in size to prevent intrusions into the main navigation channel of the inlet. 3. Provide necessary infrastructure improvements (roads, parking, water supply, inlet and channel maintenancelbypassing, water quality improvements) to sustain existing and new development. 4. Maintain high natural resource and habitat values throughout the inlet. 5. Improve water quality for shellfishing and high value habitats by remediating water quality impairments resulting from agricultural and stormwater runoff and vessel waste discharges. 6. Prevent use conflicts between shell fishing in highly productive shellfishing areas and congregations of commercial and recreational vessels in the southernmost anchorage basin, at marinas, and at other facilities and areas within the inlet. 7. Protect, maintain, and improve public access to underwater lands and the foreshore for shell fishing, fishing, recreational boating, and passive recreation. ACTIONS NEEDED Develop a harbor management plan as a component of the town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program that achieves the preceding objectives and includes priority actions, such as the following projects and procedural recommendations: 12 . . PROJECTS 1. Commercial Fishing - Provide ice, fuel, and mechanical repair facilities and services for commercial fishing vessels. (Objectives 1,2) 2. Recreation - Provide permanent or semi-permanent mooring tackle at the public anchorage at the south end of the inlet for more efficient use of space by transient vessels, and prohibit concentrations of anchored or moored vessels in productive shellfishing areas. User fees for moorings would pay for upkeep and maintenance of mooring tackle, etc. This would reduce vessel versus shell fishing conflicts by providing for a greater concentration of vessels in the anchorage rather than productive shellfishing areas, and preventing conflicts in important shellfishing areas. Provide a public park and a boat ramp with associated parking lots on the 1.3 acre state-owned parcel on northwest side of inlet. Maintain the inlet channel and anchorage basin at adequate depths and use clean dredge spoil for downdrift beach nourishment. (Objectives 1,2,3,5,6,7) 3. Water Quality - Install detention or retention basins, provide street end improvements to control and treat runoff, retrofit direct pipe discharges from roadways to treat runoff before discharge to the inlet, and maintain or create adequate buffers along watercourses tributary to the inlet. Direct runoff to buffer areas for treatment prior to discharge in the inlet. Use federal Clean Vessel Act funds to provide sufficient vessel waste pumpout and dump stations for all vessels using the inlet. (Objectives 1,3,4,5,6,7) 4. Shellfish - Improve water quality by managing, controlling, and treating agricultural and urban nonpoint runoff. Construct detention or retention basins, create buffers, and improve street ends to prevent direct discharges to the inlet. Limit vessel mooring in productive harvesting areas and increase public anchorage capacity to relocate vessels from harvest areas. Establish shellfish spawner areas (especially for oysters). Transplant shellfish from anchorage area, marinas, and channels to spawner areas and other areas for harvesting. Increase access for shellfishing during winter months by providing public boat ramp at north end of inlet. (Objectives 1,2,3,4,5,6,7) 5. Access - Provide a public boat launch near the mouth of the inlet (see recreation above). Limit new bulkheads along the shoreline which result in loss of intertidal areas used for access along inlet's shoreline. Limit the length of new docks to the minimum necessary to prevent impairments to navigation in channels and access to underwater lands for shellfishing. Provide pedestrian access to the inlet from street ends as part of street end improvements designed to control and/or treat roadway runoff. Maintain the inlet channel and anchorage basin. (Objectives 1,2,3,4,5,6,7) 6. Marinas - Maintain the inlet channel and anchorage basin at adequate depths. (Objectives 1,2,3,6,7) PROCEDURAL 1. Regulatory Simplification - Simplify the state and local regulatory process for public and private actions that are consistent with the harbor management plan. (Objectives 1,2,3) 2. Water-Dependent Uses - Maintain the M-II districts in their current locations to ensure that water- 13 . . enhanced uses can not displace water-dependent uses, and amend the M-II zoning text to eliminate non-water-dependent uses. Consider a specific provision for protecting commercial fishing facilities from displacement. (Objectives 1,4,6) 3. In-Water Structures - Establish seaward perimeter boundaries for new and eXlstmg water- dependent uses within M-II zoning districts. There is a need to limit the seaward extension of in-water structures given the narrow nature of the inlet. Within these perimeters, allow modifications to docks, piers, floats, pilings, etc., without requiring new regulatory permits for every minor modification, although changes should be reported to the town and state. Allow these in-water uses despite the SA water quality classification. Where commercial uses exist, reclassify surface waters to SB within the area occupied by these uses and within a limited and well-defined adjacent area, where shellfishing does not occur or where the area is not a productive shellfishery. (Objectives 1,2,4,6,7) 4. Tax Assessments - Assess existing water-dependent uses for their value as water-dependent uses, rather than assessing them as non-water-dependent uses, since non-water-dependent uses would be prohibited by the amended M-II roning. (Objectives 1,2) 5. Water Quality - After sufficient vessel waste pumpout and dump stations are available (most conservative standard would be one facility for each 300 vessels), designate the inlet a federal and state vessel waste no-discharge rone, and delegate federal enforcement authority to the state and town pursuant to Section 312 of the Clean Water Act. (Objectives 3,4,5,6,7) 6. Harbor Improvement District - Establish a harbor improvement district, pursuant to Section 190 of the New York State Town Law, to provide a funding mechanism for public projects and physical improvements in the inlet, such as water quality improvement projects, studies, construction and maintenance oflaunching ramps, public docks, anchorage areas, bulkheads, land acquisition, public docking facilities, dredging, etc. (Objectives 1,2,3,4,5,6,7) 14 Mattituck Inlet Maritime Center . :., .. <. J . ./\\ ...~.- ~ -,~ ~ I t i;, " ..';:".--' ........... KEY: :::::!.;: ~ l:1:r1J'i o Marine a Zoning District Commercial FIshing SuPpOrt Facilities Opportunicy fel'" WQ.(er Dep.ena.enc Redev,elopmoent . Public Access/Strecc End fmprovemencs .Proposed Vesse! Wasto Facil icic:s ~ SH S5 T Dreclged Maurial Dbposal/Bcach Nounshm..<ISand Bypauiag Signific::ant Habiclt Signific:am: ShoUlWIcri.. UrbulAgricuJturaJ Nonpoint Source Pollution MATTITUCX HARBOR. N. Y. Q.AruN. .........\,OIfG ''R."lOOQ SOU'OlJ.., )~.: '"It.:.. '''.a'~.l:'~ JCl.g... ",1.1.. . ..1"....'3..g "'I.I.. ~o.ao ~., -~~':! .~ ~""d:~'t. Z.:i'. !!::.:.... .. s.... ",., SC,o,I.-C 0' "''!:cr , ",., MAP 20.0 . . ATIACHMENT 3: REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACT MAP PRODUCTS GENERAL MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS The following general cartographic requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor: 1) Map Products -- The Division's preference is for the delivery of digital map products that meet the specifications outlined in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section. If analog map products are produced, they must meet specifications outlined in the Digital-Ready Map Product Requirements section. The ability to provide digital map products will be one of the factors used in selecting a Contractor. 2) Deliverable Format -- All digital map and attribute table files must be provided in Maplnfo 3.0 for Windows format on 4 mm DAT tape or 3.5" floppy diskette media. Alternatively, the digital products may be provided in UNIX or PC ARC/INFO binary format or AutoCAD DXF format on the same media types upon approval of the Division. All other digital formats require prior approval of the Division. All non-digital map products must be provided on stable base material at a scale agreed upon by the Division. The map products must include an index map to all map sheets and thorough descriptions of all the cartographic elements portrayed on the maps. 3) Documentation -- A data dictionary must be included along with the map files describing file contents, file names, map projection, coordinate system, RMS accuracy, information sources, and creation methodology . 4) Map Accuracy -- Unless otherwise stated by the Division, all deliverable map products must conform to National Map Accuracy Standards for horiwntal accuracy as established by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). For example, maps at 1:20,000 or smaller, not more than 10% of the well- defined map points tested must be more than 1150 inch (5 mm) out of correct position. At I :24,000, this tolerance translates to a required horizontal accuracy of 40 feet. DIGITAL CARTOGRAPIllC FILE REQUIREMENTS The following cartographic construction requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor: 1) Edge-matching -- All map sheets must be both visually and coordinate edge-matched with adjacent map sheets. No edge-match tolerance will be allowed. Attributes for splitable features must also be identical. 2) Common Boundaries -- All features that share a common boundary, regardless of map layer, must have exactly the same coordinate position of that feature in all common layers. 3) Point Duplication -- No duplication of points that occur within a data string is permitted. 4) Connectivity -- Where graphic elements visually meet, they must be also digitally meet. All confluences of line and polygon data must be exact; "overshoots", "undershoots", "slivers", or "offshoots" are NOT permitted. 16 . . S) Line Quality -- A high quality cartographic appearance must be achieved. Transitions from straight lines to curvilinear elements must be smooth, with angular inflections at the point of intersection. The digital representation must not contain extraneous data at a non visible level. There should be no jags, hooks, or zero length segments. Any lines that are straight, or should be straight, should be digitized using only two points that represent the beginning and ending points of the line. 6) Polygon Closure -- For area features being digitized, the last coordinate pair must be exactly (mathematically) equal to the first coordinate pair. No line or polygon must cross itself except to join at an actual confluence. All digitized features across map boundaries must be edited to effect smooth and continuous lines. 7) Graphic Precision -- All digital graphic elements must contain positional coordinates significant to one thousandth (.001) of a foot. 8) Digitizer Accuracy -- The required RMS error for digitizer accuracy must be .003 or better for digital map registration. DIGITAL-READY MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS The following requirements for non-digital map products must be followed to facilitate the future conversion of the maps to digital map products. 1) Base Map Media -- All maps must be created on mylar or other stable base material. 2) Map Scale -- All maps of a similar series should be created using the same base scale. Unless otherwise stated by the Division, all maps should be compiled at I :24,000. If other map scales are approved by the Division, they will conform to standard map scales such as I :9600; I :50,000; 1:75,000; or I: 100,000. 3) Map Registration -- The maps must provide a minimum of four (4) corner and four (4) interior ticks tied to USGSfNYSDOT quadrangle Lat/Long or NYTM coordinates. The maps must be geometrically correct and should register when overlaid on the appropriate USGS/NYSDOT quadrangle control ticks. 4) Map Projection and Datum -- The maps must include the map projection and the map datum used. 5) Map Title and Legend -- The maps must provide a title and legend block describing the information contained on the maps. 6) Cartographic Quality -- The quality of all map line work and symbolization must conform to items I - 6 in the map criteria set forth in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section outlined above. 17 . . CONTRACT DATABASE STANDARDS Delivery Media All database and tabular files must be delivered on 4 mm Digital Audio Tape (OAT) or 3.5" diskette. Delivery in another media format must have prior approval of the Division. Software Fonnat All database and tabular files must be provided in Borland's Paradox for Windows version 4.5 format. Other formats that are convertible to Paradox may be used with prior approval of the Division. Geographic Attributes Database and tabular files that contain elements with a geographic reference must provide a corresponding data field and a geographic coordinate pair for each feature location. ..... 18 . . CONTRACT DATABASE STANDARDS Delivery Media All database and tabular files must be delivered on 4 mm Digital Audio Tape (DAT) or 3.5" diskette. Delivery in anotber media format must have prior approval of tbe Division. Software Format All database and tabular files must be provided in Borland's Paradox for Windows version 4.5 format. Otber formats tbat are convertible to Paradox may be used witb prior approval of tbe Division. Geographic Attributes Database and tabular files tbat contain elements witb a geographic reference must provide a corresponding data field and a geographic coordinate pair for each feature location. 18 . . JUDITHT. TERRY TOWN CLERK Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southo1d, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1801 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDSMANAGEMENTOF~CER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 1. 19911: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes and directs the Town Clerk to advertise for Requests for Proposals to obtain the services of consultants for assist the Town in the preparation of a Harbor Management Study. and a Coastal Erosion Shoreline Study; said RFP's to be subject to the approval of the Town Attorney. T.'~ Southold Town Clerk November 2. 19911 / '0'= C_'. .;-; ~: ;Pel 11 -8J iP"F p/ s Each proposal received will be carefUlly evaluated for its techD.i~al merit. The following items must be addressed in the proposal. Those proposals which most satisfactorily address the foUowinl items will be considcled in the final selection: A work program for performing the Harbor Management Plan b~ on the performance standards set forth in Sec:tion 3, Performance Standards, and provisions for deliverin: all data products listed in Section 4, De1iverables as a minimum. Work proif8Dl should show th~ ContractOr', ability to provide the ~''VY products and meet the deadlines for delivery described in Sec:tion 4, Deliverables. Work program should also di~ the methodology and spe<:ity sou~ of information for performing the Harbor Management Plan. , A. B. Your firm's ability to perform the required servl~. Names, titles, qualifiations, and relative contribution of all the individuals who wUl be providing their servi~ should be given for evaluation. Indicate bow their combined qualifiationslassignments enable them to competently complete the work. Your firm's direc:t experience with harbor management planning should be presented. 6. Schedule of Work The following schedule of major milestones and aa:ompanYinl completion dates shall be maintained in developing the Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold. MAJOR MILESTONE: Issue Request For Proposal Proposal Due Date Proposal Review and Selection Contract Award Date, Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Work Program Publi~ Meeting # 1 Draft lDventory and Analysis Public Meetin& # 2 CoDlJD,CDtS from DOS and Town on Consultant Draft. Report Pinal Draft Harbor Management Plan 6 - DUE DATE: 11/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 03/95 03/95 03/95 03/31/95 PART I SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 1.0 PROJECT PURPOSE To develop a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold to provide a comprehensive examination of all surface waters within or adjacent to the Town of Southold and identify and address the problems of conflict, congestion, and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands, as further provided herein. 2.0 SCHEDULE The schedule below is an estimate of the time period leading up to the commencement of the Agreement. Its intent is to provide each Proposer with an idea of when certain events may occur. The dates given are guidelines and should not be construed as firm dates or deadlines due to the multiple parties involved in the decision-making process. EVENT DATE Advertising for proposals Pre-submission conference Proposal Opening Town Board Approval Agreement Executed Operations Commencement November 10, 1994 November 17, 1994 at 10 a.m. December 6, 1994 at 10 a.m. December 13, 1994 before December 23, 1994 December 26, 1994 3.0 EXAMINATION OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS AND FAMILIARITY WITH WORK It is the responsibility of each Proposer before submitting a Proposal to examine the specifications herein and notify the Town Clerk of all conflicts, errors or discrepancies in the Proposal Specifications. Proposals shall be expected to reflect the information contained in these specifications. A pre-submission conference will be held on November 17, 1994 at 10 a.m. at: Town Hall Conference Room 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 , /l.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT Proposals shall be submitted in a narrative format, describing the work to be performed, the estimated time to perform such work, and a rate schedule showing the hourly rates for the work, together with a maximum price for the performance of each task. The proposal shall also include a resume of the firm and its principals and a list of references showing the satisfactory performance of similar jobs, as more specifically described in Part II, Section 5 of these specifications, entitled Proposal Requirements. PROPOSALS SHALL NOT BE QUALIFIED, MODIFIED, LIMITED OR RESTRICTED IN ANY WAY. Incomplete proposals will not be considered. The proposals shall be submitted to the Office of the Town Clerk, Town of Southold, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York, 11971, prior to 10 a.m. on December 6, 199/l. Each proposer shall submit seven (7) separate complete sets of his Proposal which shall be enclosed in a sealed opaque envelope plainly marked on the outside with the title of the work and the name and address of the Proposalder. No Proposal will be considered unless filed on or before the time and at the place designated in the Notice to Proposers. Proposals received after the time set for the opening will be returned to Proposers unopened. Any Proposer may withdraw its Proposal upon receipt of a properly notarized written request made no later than the time set for Proposal opening. No alterations to these Proposal Specification will be considered valid unless in writing and issued as Addenda. All questions must be received at least ten (10) calendar days before proposal opening in order to be answered. All addenda will be on file at the Town Clerk's office at least twenty-four (2/l) hours before proposals are opened. The Town will not be bound by oral clarifications. Each Proposal must be accompanied by a Proposal guaranty in the sum of ten percent of the proposal price. No proposal will be considered unless it is accompanied by the required guaranty. The proposal bond shall name the Town as the obligee. The proposal guaranty shall ensure the execution of the agreement and the furnishing of the required bonds and insurance by the successful Proposer, as specified in these specifications. 5.0 EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT The successful Proposer, or its legally authorized representative, shall be required to appear in person within ten (10) days of the Notice of Award by the Town at the place and time designated by the Town to execute the Agreement. 6.0 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS The Town of Southold reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals if such action is deemed to be in the best interests of the Town. Proposals will be evaluated as specified in Part II, Section 5 of these specifications entitled Proposal Requirements. , 7.0 PA YMENTS The town will pay the contractor upon final submission of the Town of the Final Draft Harbor Management Plan in a form satisfactory to the Town Board. The Town shall be entitled to deduct from any payment owing to Contractor any sums expended by the Town to cure any default or other non-compliance by Contractor. 8.0 DEFAULT In the event the Contractor fails to perform its obligations under the Agreement, the Town may terminate such Agreement and the Town may procure the services from other sources and hold the Contractor responsible for any excess costs incurred and deduct from payments owing to the Contractor and/or draw upon the Performance Bond as full or partial reimbursement of such excess costs. The Town reserves the right to terminate the Agreement for just cause. NOTICE TO PROPOSERS The Town of Southold will receive Southold Harbor Management. Plan. time and at the location herein publicly read aloud: sealed proposals for The proposals will specified which will preparation of a draft be received until the then be opened and PLACE: Office of the Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1800 DATE: Tuesday, December 6, 199~ TIME: 10:00 AM EDST (LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE OPENED) Proposals must include a narrative setting forth a work program for preparing a Harbor Management Plan and delivering necessary data, as well as information on experience and references. Upon payment of non-refundable fifty dollars ($50.00) Proposal Solicitation may be picked up at: Office of the Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Judith T. Terry Town Clerk PART II TOWN OF SOUTHOLl> HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN November 1, 1994 WORK SPECIFlCATlONS 1. Description Background: The Town of Southold is requesting proposals from qualified consultants for the development of a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold. A harbor management plan addresses the problems of conflict, congestion and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands. The finished product will be used to complete the Town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP). The importance of harbor management has become clear in recent years, as the dramatic increase in the popularity of recreational boating and changes in the use of harbors has resulted in competition for space within and along the shores of the State's harbors and nearshore waters. Conflicts have increased between recreational users of harbors and waters, between recreational and commercial activities and between all uses and natural and cultural resources. These conflicts and a lack of clear authority to solve them has resulted in degraded natural and cultural characteristics of many harbors, and their ability to support a range of appropriate uses. In order to resolve these issues, Chapter 791 of the Laws of 1992 was enacted, amending Article 42 of the Executive Law (Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resources Act) to provide local governments with the clear authority to comprehensively manage activities in harbor and nearshore areas by developing comprehensive harbor management plans and laws to implement those plans. This is outlined in amendments to 19 NYCRR Part 601 which contains procedures for the development and approval of harbor management plans and have formed the basis for the development of this RFP. . The harbor management plan will be part of the Town's LWRP. The Town has been working on its LWRP for a number of years and is now concentrating on its completion. The focus of the LWRP is on protecting the coastal environment and enhancing recreational access to it. In order to complete an approvable L WRP, the Town of Southold and the Department of State have identified the need develop a town wide harbor management plan. The Town and the Department of State have also identified the need to focus on two issues. These are a town wide marina study and a detailed examination of the Mattituck Inlet. In 1994 the New York State Department of State produced the Draft Long Island Sound Coastal Management Program. This detailed study of the Sound resulted in the development of regional coastal policies, refining the State policies to reflect the issues and conditions of the Long Island Sound region, and the proposal of a series of Special Management Areas. The Regional Policies that consider harbor management issues will be applied in the preparation of the harbor management plan for the Town of Southold. The Regional Program identified that Mattituck Inlet be designated a Maritime Center. These have been identified as the most suitable locations for new or expansion of existing water-dependent commercial and industrial uses on the Sound. The Department of State further recommended the development of harbor management plans for the proposed Maritime Centers. Mattituck Inlet is Southold's only active harbor on Long Island Sound. It is the easternmost soundfront deepwater port of call on Long Island that is open to commercial fishing boats and transient recreational boaters. The Inlet has been the focus of the Town's attention since 1980, when the Mattituck Inlet Advisory Committee was appointed to focus on concerns about the declining ecological health of the Inlet. Their inventory and analysis work, contained in the Watershed Study of Mattituck Creek, led to specific recommendations that were never adopted by the Town. Task: Develop a Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold to provide a comprehensive examination of all surface waters within or adjacent to the Town of Southold and identify and address the problems of conflict, congestion, and competition for space in the use of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands. It will examine both town wide and geographically specific issues and provide recommendations for harbor management opportunities. These will provide guidance in managing boat traffic, general harbor uses, optimum location and number of boat support structures such as docks, piers, moorings, pump-out facilities, and special anchorage areas, and identification of local and federal navigation channels. Examine existing harbor management regulations at the federal, State and local levels and present town wide and geographic specific harbor management recommendations. The Harbor Management Plan will identify discrete harbor management units located within the Town and provide various alternatives for optimum waterfront and harbor use, while at the same time analyzing probable environmental effects of these alternatives. The Harbor Management Plan will highlight two main issues for immediate attention: an inventory and analysis of marinas in the Town of Southold the preparation of a detailed unit Harbor Management Plan for Mattituck Inlet Organization: The preparation of the Harbor Management Plan will be developed by a consultant under the guidance of a subcommittee of the Town's Waterfront Advisory Committee and coordinated by the Town's Planning Department. Technical assistance will be available from the New York State Department of State. Project cost: A maximum of $25,000 is available for this project through the New York State Environmental Protection Fund. 2. Study Area The study area is the marine waters within the Town of Southold or abounding the Town of Southold to a distance of fifteen hundred feet from the shore, whichever is greater. This includes in-water areas adjacent to open shorelines as well as actively used enclosed bays or harbors and associated uplands. The study area has been split into 10 shoreline reaches, developed by the Town of Southold as part of their Draft Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. There are 4 reaches along the Long Island Sound, 5 reaches along the bays, and the shoreline of Fishers Island. Emphasis will be placed on harbor management issues within Mattituck Inlet, located within Reach I. 3. Performance Standards The final report shall contain the completed Harbor Management Plan for the study area and a detailed unit Harbor Management Plan for Mattituck Inlet, with all of the products listed in Section 4, 2 Deliverables, as a minimum. The final report should also include a discussion of the methodology used, reference all sources of information, and identify any information gaps and issues requiring further study. This final report shall incorporate and respond to the comments from the draft report provided by the Department of State and the Town of Southold. The consultant will be required to attend two public meetings organized by the Town to provide the opportunity to highlight local concerns on harbor management issues and for public comment on the draft document. The report shall be prepared using WordPerfect 5.1. Map products and tabular data shall be prepared using the guidelines in Attachment 3. 4. Deliverables A. A draft Harbor MaJUlgement Programfor the Town ofSouthold containing thefollowing elements: (i) Identification of the Harbor Management boundary area. This shall be supplemented with a map of the Harbor Management study area depicting the boundary for the study area. (ii) An inventory and analysis of by reach of the existing uses of the surface water area and adjacent uplands that are relevant to the use and management of surface waters and underwater lands, natural and cultural features and conditions in this area. The Consultant will work closely with the Town of Southold to develop the inventory and analysis. For each reach, the inventory and analysis should address the following considerations: a. The location and extent of, where applicable: commercial shipping recreational boating* dry rack storage commercial and recreational fishing and shell fishing aquaculture and mariculture waste management mineral extraction dredging and deposition of dredge spoil Andros Patent Lands public access recreation habitats and other natural resource protection water quality open space aesthetic values water dependent uses common law riparian or littoral rights public interests, including interests under the Public Trust Doctrine other uses and circumstances determined to be significant by the Town. This shall be supplemented with a map for each reach depicting the boundary for the study area and identifying the existing uses of the surface water area and 3 adjacent uplands that are relevant to the use and management of surface waters and underwater lands, natural and cultural features and conditions in this area. * This stage of the inventory and analysis should include a survey of marinas located in the Town of Southold as detailed in Attachment 1. b. Identification and discussion of conflict and competition for space among the uses and users of harbors, surface waters and underwater lands. c. Identification and discussion of conditions which operate as constraints on utilization of underwater lands and navigable waters by the public. d. Identification and discussion of issues of regional and local importance. Identify regional needs for any of the various uses or users likely to be attracted to the particular qualities of the area. e. Discussion of existing regulation of the construction, size and location of wharves,docks, moorings, piers, jetties, platforms, breakwaters, or other structures, whether temporary or permanent. f. Discussion of opportunities, long and short term goals and objectives. Identification and discussion of economic, cultural and social considerations fundamental to responsible management of underwater lands and navigable waters. g. Identification of discrete harbor management units for which specific policies, recommendations and implementation measures could be developed in subsequent harbor management plans. (iii) A water use plan that provides a rational basis for the allocation and use of space within the harbors and nearshore areas of the Town of Southold, effectively zoning surface water areas and underwater lands for specific uses or a range of specific uses in order to avoid conflicts or improve conditions within harbor or nearshore areas. The water use plan shall include: a. A plan that addresses the allocation and use of space within the harbors and nearshore areas of the study area. This plan should address, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: navigation channels fairways open water areas mooring areas and allocation procedures anchorage areas dredging and deposition of dredge spoil boat launches marinas marine structures dry rack storage 4 lU~l "lUla.C~ parking and traffic circulation water dependent uses associated upland uses This shall be supplemented with a proposed water use map for each reach depicting the boundary of the study area and the harbor management units and identifying the proposed uses of the surface water area and underwater lands in the study area. The map should also identify proposed capital improvement projects and areas of specific regulation. b. Specification of policies concerning present and future use and management of the study area. The consultant will work closely with the Department of State to apply regional coastal policies on harbor management. c. Identification of capital projects necessary to implement the Harbor Management Plan. d. Specification of existing and proposed techniques and authorities to implement the Harbor Management Plan. (iv) The preparation of a detailed Harbor Management Program for Mattituck Inlet. This plan will facilitate the optimum utilization of Mattituck Inlet as a working harbor and Maritime Center, while also improving the Inlet's surface water quality, enhancing natural productivity and protecting its ecological integrity. The consultant will work closely with the Department of State in the preparation of this detailed harbor management plan. Initial inventory and analysis of Mattituck Creek was undertaken as part of the Long Island Sound Regional Coastal Management Program. This is included as Attachment B and provides the framework for this task. This plan will serve as a model for further Harbor Management Plans within the Town. This plan should be supplemented by detailed maps of the Inlet, depicting: the boundary for the study area and identifying the existing uses of the surface water area and adjacent uplands that are relevant to the use and management of surface waters and underwater lands, natural and cultural features and conditions in th is area. the boundary of the study area and identifying the proposed uses of the surface water area and underwater lands in the study area. The map should also identify proposed capital improvement projects and areas of specific regulation. B. Five final report copies including comments from the draft report provided by the Department of State and the Town of South old, and a 3.5" floppy disk containing the report in WordPerfect 5.1 format. 5. Proposal Requirements 5 Each proposal received will be carefully evaluated for its technical merit. The following items must be addressed in the proposal. Those proposals which most satisfactorily address the following items will be considered in the final selection: A. A work program for performing the Harbor Management Plan based on the performance standards set forth in Section 3, Performance Standards, and provisions for delivering all data products listed in Section 4, Deliverables as a minimum. Work program should show the Contractor's ability to provide the necessary products and meet the deadlines for delivery described in Section 4, Deliverables. Work program should also discuss the methodology and specify sources of information for performing the Harbor Management Plan. B. Your firm's ability to perform the required services. Names, titles, qualifications, and relative contribution of all the individuals who will be providing their services should be given for evaluation. Indicate how their combined qualifications/assignments enable them to competently complete the work. Your firm's direct experience with harbor management planning should be presented . 6. Schedule of Work The following schedule of major milestones and accompanying completion dates shall be maintained in developing the Harbor Management Plan for the Town of Southold. MAJOR MILESTONE: Issue Request For Proposal Proposal Due Date Proposal Review and Selection Contract Award Date Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Work Program Public Meeting # I Draft Inventory and Analysis Public Meeting # 2 Comments from DOS and Town on Consultant Draft Report Final Draft Harbor Management Plan 6 DUE DATE: 11/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 12/94 03/95 03/95 03/95 03/31/95 A'ITACHMENT 1: EVALUATlON OF MARINAS An inventory and analysis of marinas located in the Town of Southold. The study will help to determine the appropriateness of the existing uses, and the need to expand or increase the number of marina facilities, assuring that an adequate portion of the waterfront is reserved for water-<lependent uses. Marinas are defined as those facilities adjacent to water providing safe and secure mooring, berthing, or storage for boats including the functions of marinas and related ancillary structures; e.g. docks, piers; boat launching ramps, anchorages, breakwaters, channels, moorings, basins, repair service, fuel sales, rentals, and parking areas. Yacht clubs and private boat basins within subdivision developments on private and patent lands will also be considered, along with marinas, for the purposes of this study. The analysis of existing conditions should consider the following factors: A. LOCATION AND LAND USE Location on the shoreline - is it at the head or mouth of a creek or inlet or on a bay? is it appropriate to increase boat traffic and activity in this location? zoning - does the site/use fit the current zoning requirements? are the zoning requirements reasonable and adequate or are they in need of amendments? surrounding land uses - what land uses surround the site? what are the permitted land uses? do all existing land uses support the intent of the marine zoning districts? compatibility - is the marina compatible with the existing zoning and character of the area, with consideration being given to scale, architectural style, density and intensity of use? traditional uses - what is the development history of the marina? have water-<lependent and water-enhanced uses been commonplace, since the opening of the facility? water supply and wastewater disposal - what are the sources of water supply, how is wastewater handled and how is it disposed of? marina services - what is the level of services offered at the marina (e.g. boat repair and maintenance, boat storage, boat launch and haul out, vessel winterization, boat sales, motor sales, fuel, pumpout facilities, sail making and repair, and bait shop)? are water- enhanced uses (e.g. restaurants and retail stores) associated with the marina? what are the projected demands? types of boats - what is the pattern of boat usage (e.g. recreational, transient, commercial fishing, charter/party boats)? overnight accommodations - are accommodations provided for boaters wishing to stay on their boats overnight? vehicular access to and within the site - is it adequate? is it compatible with the connecting roads/highways? what are the existing and potential trip generators? the Town Trustees operate as a "marina" owner through their regulation of moorings on Town-owned bottom - how do the Trustees operate this function? where are moorings permitted? what is the access to moorings? what are the size of boats? what are the types of moorings? could procedures be improved? B. SITE LAYOUT existing layout - what is the layout and design of permanent and temporary uses on the site? are additional parcels leased or used by the marina? expansion potential - is there additional land area available for facility expansion? does the current zoning enable appropriate expansion? how practical or appropriate would it be for the marina to expand? 7 ..--- --0---- ...... -..- .. V" ~Y"'''''''''' WU~V"""'_ n".u Q. o:)P"""'I.I.I.'" u.o:)~: I.., UI.II;i .auu u. l)V~ sufficient to meet the demand of the facility? are transportation alternatives available which would effectively reduce the demand for additional parking? is off-site parking a viable option? boat storage - what types of boat storage are available (e.g. in-water, upland storage, dry rack)? boat maintenance areas - are they present? are they designed in such a way that all maintenance activities can be accomplished over dry land and under roofs? are water quality mitigation measures employed? shoreline protection structures - approximately how much of the marina's shoreline has been bulkheaded? what material is used? C. DOCKS AND STRUCTURES IN WATER navigability/dredging - is navigation, adjacent to and within the confines of the marina, easily achieved? do the present locations of docks or moorings pose a problem to navigability? where, and how often, is dredging performed? is the dredging performed by private contractors, at private expense, by the federal government, or by the County? is there a federal navigation channel? fixed vs. floating docks - what is the total number of fixed docks and floating docks, respectively, in the marina? what is the total number of dockside slips rented? length and configuration - what is the length and width of the docks in the marina? what is the general configuration? is there expansion potential? moorings - does the marina lease mooring sites? if so, where are commercial moorings located? what is the total number of moorings operated by the marina? are moorings adequate to meet current and future demands? underwater lands - who owns the underwater lands within the marina? does the Town have jurisdiction? if not, which entity has jurisdiction? D. ECOLOGY water quality - what are the water quality classifications? where are the stormwater discharge points located, if there are any present? is there a noticeable and concerted effort, to the extent feasible, to direct runoff away from adjacent waters and wetlands by site grading or other methods? what marina best management measures are employed? shellfish beds - have shellfish harvest closures occurred as a result of the proximity of the marina to the shellfish bed? has expansion of marina based activities, in the past, resulted in the closure of the bed(s)? habitats - are there habitats or other natural areas in the vicinity which could be impacted by marina activity? E. CULTURAL RESOURCES historic and archaeological resources - are there structures or sites of either historical or archaeological significance in the vicinity of the marina? visual access - from land: how visible is the water from any public point either upland or adjacent to the marina? if the public's view is impaired or blocked, what is the nature of the visual impediment? from water: what is the view of the shoreline from the water? public access - is there a provision for public access on the site? if so, where? are there public lands adjacent to the facility? 8 ATI'ACHMENT 2: MATI'ITUCK INLET Mattituck Inlet is located in the hamlet of Mattituck on the north shore of Long Island, in the Town of Southold, and is the only harbor on the north shore to the east of Mount Sinai Harbor. The tidal inlet is extremely narrow and approximately two miles long. The widest parts of the inlet, which are only a few hundred feet wide, are in the southern half. The inlet supports substantial vegetated tidal wetlands, shell fisheries, and a state-designated Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat. It also contains a number of commercial and recreational water-dependent uses which are concentrated in three locations: at the inlet's extreme southern end; at its midpoint; and on the west shore near the northernmost end of the inlet. Residential development surrounds most of the inlet. Water-dependent uses include five marinas, commercial fishing, party and charter boats, and a transient anchorage area and two boat ramps in the extreme south end of the inlet. Most of the water-dependent uses are concentrated on the west side of the inlet. Agriculture is a major land use within the inlet's watershed. Approximately 21 acres of vacant, underutilized land, zoned Marine-II (M-I1), is available for new commercial development or redevelopment on the northwest side of the inlet. This is a former industrial area which consisted of petroleum and asphalt tank farms. This area could accommodate new marinas and other recreational or commercial water-dependent uses, or a mix of uses. Sufficient space exists for upland dry rack storage of vessels and limited in-water facilities, boat ramps, and associated parking areas. WATER DEPENDENT USES Commercial Fishing and ShelIrlShing Facilities in the inlet support approximately 20 to 25 commercial fishing vessels. Most of these boats make daily runs, although several make extended trips. There are excellent docking facilities for commercial fishing vessels, with over 250 feet of bulkheaded dock space. One facility has a hydraulic crane for loading and unloading and, unlike most ports on the Sound, provides some gear storage space. No ice is available, and fuel facilities are deficient, requiring fuel to be brought to commercial vessels. Mechanical and engine repairs for commercial vessels are lacking, but is provided by on-call mechanics. Unlike other ports on the Sound, Mattituck is used by transient commercial vessels from Shinnecock Inlet during the summer. Although the inlet is relatively small, it is also an extremely productive shellfish growing and commercial harvesting area, producing hard clams, soft clams, and oysters of local and regional importance. Recreation The inlet is the only harbor on the north shore east of Mount Sinai Harbor and provides long-term and transient recreational vessel anchoring, slips, and services. Five marinas in the inlet provide dockage for approximately 600 recreational vessels, and approximately 150 recreational vessels are moored throughout the inlet. The greatest single concentration of moored transient vessels (approximately 25) are located in the federally dredged anchorage area at the extreme southern end of the inlet. Two boat ramps, one owned and operated by the Mattituck Park District for district residents and the other owned by the town and for town residents, are at the south end of the inlet. A 1.3 acre parcel at the extreme northwest corner of the inlet south of the west jetty, recently acquired by the Town of Southold in 1993 using Environmental Quality Bond Act funds, is an appropriate and suitable site for a public boat ramp due to its proximity to the Sound. Two parks and beaches, which are part of the Mattituck Park District, front 9 Long Island Sound on both the east and west side of the inlet and are limited to use by park district residents. The park and beach on the west side abuts the inlet's west jetty at the inlet's entrance. The east park and beach abuts the inlet's east jetty and the Mattituck Inlet Wetlands Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat located south of the beach. The inlet also supports some recreational shellfishing. The state-owned wetlands and the park abutting them on the east shore provide opportunities for passive recreation such as nature study and observation. NATURAL RESOURCES Wetlands and Habitat Vegetated tidal wetlands exist throughout the inlet. The most extensive. undisturbed vegetated wetlands are part of the approximately 60 acre state-designated Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitat, which includes most of the open water of the inlet and its wetlands north of Mill Road. Most of the vegetated wetlands in the designated habitat are owned by the state Department of Environmental Conservation. The remainder of the underwater lands and tidal wetlands are owned by the Town of Southold. Wetlands are highly productive and support a variety of fish and wildlife within the inlet and in Long Island Sound near the inlet, including a substantial soft clam and oyster shellfishery, which is dependent on high water quality and undisturbed wetlands. Water Quality The water quality classification in the inlet is SA, and its highest assigned use standard is shellfishing. The inlet fails to meet the class SA water quality and use standards during the summer. Conditional shell fishing is allowed, however, in the winter except following a 0.2" rainfall within a 24 hour period, when coliform loadings exceed acceptable levels. Agricultural and urban nonpoint runoff within the inlet's narrow drainage basin are the primary sources of water quality and shellfish harvesting use impairments. Roadway drainage pipe discharges to the creek have been identified by the town as a source of nonpoint pollution. Water quality and use impairments are also related to large numbers of vessels in marinas and the public anchorage at the south end of the inlet. SUMMARY OF ISSUES AND PROBLEMS The issues and problems confronting Mattituck Inlet as a maritime center are summarized below and illustrated on map 20.0 Problems within the inlet and its immediate area include: limited public access to the inlet and its resources for water-dependent recreation, navigation, and shell fishing; use conflicts within the inlet; insufficient infrastructure; and substandard groundwater and surface water quality. Issues include: the need to protect and prevent the displacement of water-dependent uses within the inlet; to redevelop approximately 21 acres of vacant and underutilized waterfront land at the north end of the inlet; to improve surface water quality for shell fishing; and to maintain high value natural resources within the inlet. Commercial Water-Dependent Uses Although the existing water-dependent uses are consistent with their current M-II zoning category, the M-II district also allows non-water-dependent uses which could displace the important water-dependent uses. The displacement of docking facilities for the commercial fishing fleet would be disastrous, since the existing facilities are the only ones available in this part of the Long Island Sound region; and their loss would adversely affect the commercial fishing industry on Long Island. There is also a need to 10 maintain the existing marinas in the inlet to meet the demand for recreational vessel storage and servicing. There is an opportunity to facilitate the location of new water-dependent recreational facilities or a mix of water-dependent and water-enhanced uses within the existing 21-acre underutilized area at the north end of the inlet. This area is most appropriate for new water-dependent uses, such as marinas, boat yards, and boat ramps, due to its proximity to the Sound, its previously disturbed and leveled terrain, and few natural resource constraints both on and immediately off-site. This is also one of the only areas in the inlet large enough to provide sufficient buffer area between water-dependent uses and residences. Petroleum tanks have been removed; however, some remaining tanks may still contain asphalt. It is not known if the area is contaminated or in need of remediation prior to redevelopment. If these areas are redeveloped for commercial or recreational water-dependent uses, such as marinas or boat yards, remediation may not be necessary. Navigation and Access to Underwater Lands and the Foreshore New in-water structures, such as docks and bulkheads, have become prevalent throughout much of the inlet. These structures impede access along the foreshore and to underwater lands for shell fishing and other uses, and impede navigation in narrow, shallow areas. New in-water structures which adversely affect access and navigation need to be limited to the minimum necessary in order for property owners to exercise their littoral rights of access to the water, in order to prevent impairments to navigation and public access along the shore. Structures that cover large areas of underwater lands should be limited to areas adjacent to upland areas zoned for water-dependent uses, and should be limited in length so as not to interfere with navigation channels and navigation buffer areas. The anchorage at the south end of the inlet does not provide moorings for transient vessels. These vessels must use conventional anchors with .greater scope than moorings. As a result, the vessels swing in large arcs and use valuable space in the basin. Vessels often anchor outside of the basin due to a lack of space. Permanent or semi- permanent moorings and tackle for transients, which are safer than conventional anchors and use a shorter scope, would result in better use of space in the basin. A greater concentration of vessels could be moored in the anchorage rather than spread out elsewhere in the inlet. Infrastructure Constraints Major new development and major expansions of existing development are constrained throughout the inlet due to the lack of a readily available potable water supply, insufficient roadway infrastructure and parking space for major expansions of existing commercial uses, and insufficient surface water area between the established navigation channel and commercial upland uses. The shallow groundwater table, which has been the area's source of potable water, has been polluted from agricultural pesticides. It is not economically feasible to extend new public water supply lines to the area. Narrow, winding residential streets surround the entire inlet, except at its extreme south end, where a major county road is within a few hundred feet of the Mattituck Park District and town boat ramps. Limited parking is available at the south end of the inlet at the boat ramps, the park and beach at the entrance to the inlet on its west side, and at the park and beach at the entrance to the inlet on its west side (all for district residents only). Little space is available for new in-water structures or uses, since the inlet is so narrow and the existing navigation channel occupies much of the inlet. Erosion and Inlet and Beach Maintenance At the entrance to the inlet, beach erosion and shoaling is a problem that needs to be resolved. Shoaling of the inlet is a hazard for large commercial and recreational vessels, and the two jetties along each side of the inlet's entrance prevent the downdrift movement of beach material, resulting in downdrift erosion of the beach on the east side of the inlet. Sand bypassing of the inlet would reduce inlet shoaling and restore the sand budget to downdrift beaches. II Water Quality and ShellflShing Substandard water quality resulting from nonpoint source pollution precludes tbe inlet's assigned use for shell fishing during most of tbe year, except during cold and dry periods during tbe winter when tbere is very little runoff entering tbe inlet. While water quality frequently fails to meet tbe inlet's assigned SA water quality standards, it may be possible to improve water quality, retain tbe SA classification, and reopen areas witbin tbe inlet for shellfishing. This will require adequate control and treatment of stormwater and agricultural runoff using nonstructural as well as structural management practices prior to its entry into tbe inlet. If tbese improvements are effective, tbe standard for closures might be amended to relax tbe 0.2" rainfall standard to allow shellfishing more often. In addition, use conflicts between shell fishing and concentrations of vessels in marinas and mooring areas need to be minimized in order to reopen portions of tbe inlet to shellfishing. Some of tbe potential risks of vessel waste pollution may be reduced by providing sufficient pumpout or dump stations for vessel wastes and designating tbe inlet a vessel waste no-discharge zone, but tbe potential for pollution from concentrations of vessels would still exist. In order to effectively resolve tbese use conflicts, concentrations of vessels will have to be limited to specific areas and prohibited in areas tbat are most important for shellfish harvesting. SUMMARY OF OVERALL OBJECTIVES I. Protect and maintain existing water-dependent uses in tbeir present locations and improve conditions, so tbat tbey can operate cleanly and more efficiently, and allow tbese uses to expand witbin well-defined limits. 2. Facilitate tbe siting of new water-dependent uses on former industrial sites at tbe north end of tbe inlet, such as at least one public boat ramp and parking area, marinas and/or boat yards witb dry rack storage. Any in-water facilities would be limited in size to prevent intrusions into tbe main navigation channel of tbe inlet. 3. Provide necessary infrastructure improvements (roads, parking, water supply, inlet and channel maintenance/bypassing, water quality improvements) to sustain existing and new development. 4. Maintain high natural resource and habitat values tbroughout tbe inlet. 5. Improve water quality for shellfishing and high value habitats by remediating water quality impairments resulting from agricultural and stormwater runoff and vessel waste discharges. 6. Prevent use conflicts between shellfishing in highly productive shellfishing areas and congregations of commercial and recreational vessels in. tbe soutbernmost anchorage basin, at marinas, and at otber facilities and areas witbin tbe inlet. 7. Protect, maintain, and improve public access to underwater lands and tbe foreshore for shell fishing, fishing, recreational boating, and passive recreation. ACTIONS NEEDED Develop a harbor management plan as a component of tbe town's Local Waterfront Revitalization Program tbat achieves tbe preceding objectives and includes priority actions, such as tbe following projects and procedural recommendations: 12 PROJECTS I. Commercial Fishing - Provide ice, fuel, and mechanical repair facilities and services for commercial fishing vessels. (Objectives 1,2) 2. Recreation - Provide permanent or semi-permanent mooring tackle at the public anchorage at the south end of the inlet for more efficient use of space by transient vessels, and prohibit concentrations of anchored or moored vessels in productive shellfishing areas. User fees for moorings would pay for upkeep and maintenance of mooring tackle, etc. This would reduce vessel versus shell fishing conflicts by providing for a greater concentration of vessels in the anchorage rather than productive shell fishing areas, and preventing conflicts in important shellfishing areas. Provide a public park and a boat ramp with associated parking lots on the 1.3 acre state-owned parcel on northwest side of inlet. Maintain the inlet channel and anchorage basin at adequate depths and use clean dredge spoil for downdrift beach nourishment. (Objectives 1,2,3,5,6,7) 3. Water Quality - Install detention or retention basins, provide street end improvements to control and treat runoff, retrofit direct pipe discharges from roadways to treat runoff before discharge to the inlet, and maintain or create adequate buffers along watercourses tributary to the inlet. Direct runoff to buffer areas for treatment prior to discharge in the inlet. Use federal Clean Vessel Act funds to provide sufficient vessel waste pumpout and dump stations for all vessels using the inlet. (Objectives 1,3,4,5,6,7) 4. Shellfish - Improve water quality by managing, controlling, and treating agricultural and urban nonpoint runoff. Construct detention or retention basins, create buffers, and improve street ends to prevent direct discharges to the inlet. Limit vessel mooring in productive harvesting areas and increase public anchorage capacity to relocate vessels from harvest areas. Establish shellfish spawner areas (especially for oysters). Transplant shellfish from anchorage area, marinas, and channels to spawner areas and other areas for harvesting. Increase access for shell fishing during winter months by providing public boat ramp at north end of inlet. (Objectives 1,2,3,4,5,6,7) 5. Access - Provide a public boat launch near the mouth of the inlet (see recreation above). Limit new bulkheads along the shoreline which result in loss of intertidal areas used for access along inlet's shoreline. Limit the length of new docks to the minimum necessary to prevent impairments to navigation in channels and access to underwater lands for shell fishing . Provide pedestrian access to the inlet from street ends as part of street end improvements designed to control and/or treat roadway runoff. Maintain the inlet channel and anchorage basin. (Objectives 1,2,3,4,5,6,7) 6. Marinas - Maintain the inlet channel and anchorage basin at adequate depths. (Objectives 1,2,3,6,7) PROCEDURAL I. Regulatory Simplification - Simplify the state and local regulatory process for public and private actions that are consistent with the harbor management plan. (Objectives 1,2,3) 2. Water-Dependent Uses - Maintain the M-I1 districts in their current locations to ensure that water- 13 enhanced uses can not displace water-dependent uses, and amend the M-II zoning text to eliminate non-water-dependent uses. Consider a specific provision for protecting commercial fishing facilities from displacement. (Objectives 1,4,6) 3. In-Water Structures - Establish seaward perimeter boundaries for new and existing water- dependent uses within M-II zoning districts. There is a need to limit the seaward extension of in-water structures given the narrow nature of the inlet. Within these perimeters, allow modifications to docks, piers, floats, pilings, etc., without requiring new regulatory permits for every minor modification, although changes should be reported to the town and state. Allow these in-water uses despite the SA water quality classification. Where commercial uses exist, reclassify surface waters to SB within the area occupied by these uses and within a limited and well-defined adjacent area, where shellfishing does not occur or where the area is not a productive shellfishery. (Objectives 1,2,4,6,7) 4. Tax Assessments - Assess existing water-dependent uses for their value as water-dependent uses, rather than assessing them as non-water-dependent uses, since non-water-dependent uses would be prohibited by the amended M-II zoning. (Objectives 1,2) 5. Water Quality - After sufficient vessel waste pumpout and dump stations are available (most conservative standard would be one facility for each 300 vessels), designate the inlet a federal and state vessel waste no-discharge zone, and delegate federal enforcement authority to the state and town pursuant to Section 312 of the Clean Water Act. (Objectives 3,4,5,6,7) 6. Harbor Improvement District - Establish a harbor improvement district, pursuant to Section 190 of the New York State Town Law, to provide a funding mechanism for public projects and physical improvements in the inlet, such as water quality improvement projects, studies, construction and maintenance oflaunching ramps, public docks, anchorage areas, bulkheads, land acquisition, public docking facilities, dredging, etc. (Objectives 1,2,3,4,5,6,7) 14 .::..; ,. <, ;,~. , ~ ~ ..... .,..... ..:.......... Mattituck Inlet Maritime Center KEY: :::::!.;: ~ H'l::r.( o Marine a Zoning District Commet'l:iaJ FtShing Support Facilities Opportunity for Water Dep~na~n( Redo=velopm~n( . Public Access/Scree! End [mprovements .Proposed Vesse! Waste Facil jci~ ~ SH S5 T Dredged Mac:eriaJ Disposal/Beach NourishmeaclSand ByPassing Signific:anc HabiClt Significant SheUruhcrie:s Urban/AgriculturaJ Nonpoinc Soure~ Pollucion MATTTTUCK HARBOR. N. Y. OAruM '" ''''-~''''OHG ''l:t..uoo lau"44] ~'l J:..: "0\.:" '''''0. ~.~:::~ J!!:l..O'" ".S.l.. ...I.....<QLO "'Ll.. '0..0.0 ..'] -{'7 -;.. --'.l-::-. ~.:~6' !!'-.:..... s.... . .."'" 5c.,L....E: a... #'t.E":' , .~ MAP 20.0 I ATTACHMENT 3: REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACT MAP PRODUCTS GENERAL MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS The following general cartographic requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor: 1) Map Products -- The Division's preference is for the delivery of digital map products that meet the specifications outlined in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section. If analog map products are produced, they must meet specifications outlined in the Digital-Ready Map Product Requirements section. The ability to provide digital map products will be one of the factors used in selecting a Contractor. 2) Deliverable Format -- All digital map and attribute table files must be provided in Maplnfo 3.0 for Windows format on 4 mm DAT tape or 3.5" floppy diskette media. Alternatively, the digital products may be provided in UNIX or PC ARC/INFO binary format or AutoCAD DXF format on the same media types upon approval of the Division. All other digital formats require prior approval of the Division. All non-digital map products must be provided on stable base material at a scale agreed upon by the Division. The map products must include an index map to all map sheets and thorough descriptions of all the cartographic elements portrayed on the maps. 3) Documentation -- A data dictionary must be included along with the map files describing file contents, file names, map projection, coordinate system, RMS accuracy, information sources, and creation methodology. 4) Map Accuracy -- Unless otherwise stated by the Division, all deliverable map products must conform to National Map Accuracy Standards for horizontal accuracy as established by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). For example, maps at 1:20,000 or smaller, not more than 10% of the well- defined map points tested must be more than 1/50 inch (5 mm) out of correct position. At I :24,000, this tolerance translates to a required horizontal accuracy of 40 feet. DIGITAL CARTOGRAPffiC FILE REQUIREMENTS The following cartographic construction requirements must be adhered to by the Contractor: 1) Edge-matching -- All map sheets must be both visually and coordinate edge-matched with adjacent map sheets. No edge-match tolerance will be allowed. Attributes for splitable features must also be identical. 2) Common Boundaries -- All features that share a common boundary, regardless of map layer, must have exactly the same coordinate position of that feature in all common layers. 3) Point Duplication -- No duplication of points that occur within a data string is permitted. 4) Connectivity -- Where graphic elements visually meet, they must be also digitally meet. All confluences of line and polygon data must be exact; "overshoots", "undershoots", "slivers", or "offshoots" are NOT permitted. 16 5) Line Quality -- A high quality cartographic appearance must be achieved. Transitions from straight lines to curvilinear elements must be smooth, with angular inflections at the point of intersection. The digital representation must not contain extraneous data at a non visible level. There should be no jags, hooks, or zero length segments. Any lines that are straight, or should be straight, should be digitized using only two points that represent the beginning and ending points of the line. 6) Polygon Closure -- For area features being digitized, the last coordinate pair must be exactly (mathematically) equal to the first coordinate pair. No line or polygon must cross itself except to join at an actual confluence. All digitized features across map boundaries must be edited to effect smooth and continuous lines. 7) Graphic Precision -- All digital graphic elements must contain positional coordinates significant to one thousandth (.001) of a foot. 8) Digitizer Accuracy -- The required RMS error for digitizer accuracy must be .003 or better for digital map registration. DIGITAL-READY MAP PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS The following requirements for non-digital map products must be followed to facilitate the future conversion of the maps to digital map products. 1) Base Map Media -- All maps must be created on mylar or other stable base material. 2) Map Scale -- All maps of a similar series should be created using the same base scale. Unless otherwise stated by the Division, all maps should be compiled at I :24,000. If other map scales are approved by the Division, they will conform to standard map scales such as 1:9600; 1 :50,000; 1 :75,000; or 1:100,000. 3) Map Registration -- The maps must provide a minimum of four (4) corner and four (4) interior ticks tied to USGS/NYSDOT quadrangle Lat/Long or NYTM coordinates. The maps must be geometrically correct and should register when overlaid on the appropriate USGS/NYSDOT quadrangle control ticks. 4) Map Projection and Datum -- The maps must include the map projection and the map datum used. 5) Map Title and Legend -- The maps must provide a title and legend block describing the information contained on the maps. 6) Cartographic Quality -- The quality of all map line work and symbolization must conform to items I - 6 in the map criteria set forth in the Digital Cartographic File Requirements section outlined above. 17 CONTRACT DATABASE STANDARDS Delivery Media All database and tabular files must be delivered on 4 mm Digital Audio Tape (DA T) or 3.5" diskette. Delivery in anotber media format must have prior approval of tbe Division. Software Fonnat All database and tabular files must be provided in Borland's Paradox for Windows version 4.5 format. Otber formats tbat are convertible to Paradox may be used witb prior approval of tbe Division. Geographic Attributes Database and tabular files tbat contain elements witb a geographic reference must provide a corresponding data field and a geographic coordinate pair for each feature location. .... 18 , CONTRACT DATABASE STANDARDS Delivery Media All database and tabular files must be delivered on 4 mm Digital Audio Tape (OAT) or 3.5" diskette. Delivery in another media format must have prior approval of the Division. Software Format All database and tabular files must be provided in Borland's Paradox for Windows version 4.5 format. Other formats that are convertible to Paradox may be used with prior approval of the Division. Geographic Attributes Database and tabular files that contain elements with a geographic reference must provide a corresponding data field and a geographic coordinate pair for each feature location. 18