Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-53.-5-12.3 Nov 1f) 1986 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION November 10 , 1986 BAYVIEW REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP. , owner of premises known as the Sage Property in Southold, New York, hereby authorizes HENRY E. RAYNOR, JR. as its lawful agent to withdraw previous subdivision applications filed by said Corporation and, further, i; to file present or future zoning applications with respect to ii said property. I I This authority includes any and all actions necessary and proper in order to further said applications. BAYVIEW REALTY DEVELO MENT CORP. By: E Y F R ELLI , President i I i �I I COUNCILMAN STOUTENBURGH- Dave Emilita wanted me to let you know that there is a scoping session on Friday, June 6 , 1986 at 11: 00 a.m. for the DEIS of Breezey Shores (the Sage property) if you would like to attend. Diane M. Schultze 0 cv�FOLY ��, P CAS D TOLD S Y 41 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 23 , 1986 Mr. Jeffery Forchelli Attonery at Law 120 Mineola Blvd. Mineola, NY 11501 Re: Scoping Session Sage Property Dear Mr. Forchelli: Enclosed, in accordance with your request, is a copy of the minutes of the scoping session regarding "Breezey'.` Shores" Please contact this office if you have any questions . Very truly yours , Z 'k NNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CtAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. BREEZY SHORES PART III 1 . Demolition and construction of single family homes could take over 1 year for completion. This will extend other potential impacts (ie noise, erosion, etc . ) which combined could have potentially larger impacts . 2 . An unusual land form found on the easterly end or the site is a 1. 566± island. This island is probably a protective haven for wildlife (ducks, geese, etc. ) . Any use of this land may have adverse impacts . 3 . With the possibliity of construction of 23 sewage systems within the close proximity of Southold Bay there is the potential for effluent seepage into the Bay. Mitigation measures could include a "Community type" system or relocate systems or connection with adjacent development. 4 . Potential for groundwater contamination from sewage systems and possible fertilization of lawns (singularly and combined) :siltation and storm runoff is likely into Southold Bay during demolition and construction stages of project. 5 . Erosion possible, during demolition and construction, into Southold Bay. 6 . Dust may be raised during construction. Heavy machinery can also add higher amounts of CO2 and NO2 particulates into air. 7. Resident and migratory wildlife will be driven from the site during construction. 8 . Larger two-story homes will replace existing smaller one- story cottages causing a visual difference on site. Due to the lack of screening and the topography (low lying) of the area the site is easily visible to surrounding homeowners. 9 . With the introduction of 23 year round homeowners an increased burden on recreation compared to the "seasonal" residents whose burden would be mainly summer. 10 . A major increase of year round traffic will be introduced onto Route 25 from Sage Blvd. The increase will also cause a direct burden on Sage Blvd. being that there isn only one means of ingress and egress . A second means to relieve traffic congestion should be devised. 11. Destruction of wetlands is proposed. Adverse impacts on drainage, water quality, wildlife hamitate, plant species and possibly endangered species would occur. 12 . Noise increase during demolition and construction. 13 . Increase in need for police, ambulance, and fire protection. Also an added burden on the sanitary landfill. 14 . Public controversy has been received relating to the project. • BREEZEY SHORES • BASED ON 12 NOVEMBER 1985 PART I AND CONCEPT PLAN 7 MARCH 1986 YIELD MAP AS SUBMITTED EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART II Project lmoacts and Their Maar,itude General infar-ation ;Prod Carefully) - In completing tre &am. the reviewer should be guided by the question: Save my decisions and determinations been reasonable' The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying that ar effect will be potentially large (col" 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily sicnificant. Ary large effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. By identifying an arTe—ctin colunn 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. - The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever cossible the threshold of maga tune that would trigger a response in caluin 2. The examples are generally applicable tnrougneut the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower t.hresnolds may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, an each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the exanoles have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each nuestion. - The miter of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any, effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering yes to a question then check the apomoriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check cclumn 2. If Impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact then consider the imeact as notentially large and oroceeo to PART 3. - e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than large magnitude, place a Yes in colunn 3. A No response indicates- that such a reduction is not possible. 1. Z. 3. [SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE ERATE LARGE REOUCEO BY PACT 1MPACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON LA40 NO YES WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE TO O PROJECT SITE? Examples that uoula Acaly to Colum. 2 N Any -onstruc-or on sicoes of 15' or greater, (15 foot rise ner 1C0 foot of lematr;, or -.here the general slooes in tie project area exceed 10t. Y Construction on Lana wnere the depth to the water taole is less X X than 3 feet. N ronstruction of naved nartinc are- frr I.` or more venicles. _ N Censtraction on 13rd where bedrock is exnosed or aeneraliy .it^in 3 feet of existing ground surface. Y Cans-.ract,d- tra• will continue for rare than I wear ar invoive X X rare than ice re3se or —3ce. -- N `-xcevet•.on far ^ -na purposes :hat .auld rera ve -.are -man ! _'CC tens cf rdtur3l al i1.e. rpCx or sail` `er year, N ons:^:c Liar a` lnv ne, ;anitary lanaf;ll. <"ALL -a P07 T:AL CAN ; 'FAC 3c ^.ERA TE LARGE RECUC LC 3Y ,uoar, 'un a CT N Const rucn on in a dei ign ace? floadway. -- - - Y Other imoacts: Construction_in_a_FIRM ± f1nnd znne X X —_'?) YES — 2. WILL THERE 3E AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL LANn Fn RMS��g�X) FOUND ON THE SIT-? (i.e. Cliffs, dunes, aeoloalcal fora- V V cions, etc.) Y snec;fic land foms:1. 566 ± acre Island on X X easterly end of site. > (!'PACT CN WATER 5 NO YES 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER BODY DESIGNATED AS ..........0 12 PROTECTED? (Under 4rtitles 15, 24, 25 of the Enrir- onmental Conservation Lav, E.C.L.) F`- "r Examales that 'Would Anply to ColuwI 2 cceerntia1 Oredgine pore than 109 cubic y& 0 sfS is l e frau X X c.^.annel of a Protected stream. — Y Construction in a designated freshwaterq,,at 11ddal .etland. W _X Other ,mbdC23: 3. WILL PROJEC AFFECT ANY 9CN:PRCTEu.ED EXISTING OR NP9 90 YES 5COY OF bA i'cR? .. ... .....0 r� Examples that 'Would Aooly to 'Olu:rn 2 (�`�) A lO: Increase or decrease in the surface area Of any body I _ of eater or +ore than a 10 acre increase or decrease. l+ N .PnstruCtiOn Of a todY of Water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. - Y Other r"acts. Poss . effluent_ runoff into I _X Sou7h`ld Ba v from indivdual sewage }- syystems. --CTT YES — 'J;L: ;QUE T AFFFCT SI1RFACE 74 4ROUNOWA7ER IIIALITy? O X Ev3-0 i,s that 'could A^_91y td Cclu m 2 ". aro .c• Wil' renu,re a discharge oemtt. Y R^'ect 'ecu'"S ase 9f a scu-'_e of tracer that does not nave X X anraval -c serve :nco sea Pro;ecrt. — 0....e.- - ' N err res ,ater sx:Iy rvm ei's .it, hr-_at'r canons :e• „lout=_ nurc ng caoaC,'y. — N .r;<c':n .rera:•on caus,ng any con:an,naci on o`^a :ucl•c ,a ter sucoly Satem. — r Y -.___ „ aor..sell a' ___ Ir:undWa t_. . X X r of, ce . site :. _. .nl :resentiv,tcr nave — ¢ ..:ac.. ':at .Pula s d . - X X During demolition and construction 1. 2. _ 3. 71Z TO NITEVIAL I CA11 IHPACT SE OERATE LARGE RECUM OY NPACT I"P4CT PROJECT CHANGE Y Otner Impacts- Localized Nitrate loadi�n�g �and X orgainc confaminna=po�EiarUlle—foTn fertilizers and household chemicals. S. 'TILL PROJECT ALTER ORAINAAF FL71, PATTEPIS OR SIIRFJW.E !LATER 00 YES RUNOFF?., ...................................................0® Exa_ale that Yowld Apply to Cali" 2 Y Protect would impede flood water flows. X _ X Y Prohact is likely to cause substantial erosion. during demolition and construction. Protect is intomatibl* with existing drainage patterns. X X_ Other impacts: ICAACT YN AIR 110 YES 1. WILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR OMITY?..........................•O O F:amles that Would Apply to Colum 2 _N Project will induce 1,900 or son vehicle trips in any given Mur. N ►eject will result in the incineration of rani than 1 ton of refuse Per hour. N Project emission rate of all contawinants will Cached S Its. per hour or a heat source Producing aunt than 10 — million BTU's par Mur. Y other impacts: dust raised during _X construction and heavy equip.operatio . Ives" ON PANTS ANn ANIMALS 8. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR ENOANFEREO SPECIES? 90 YESO O Examples that Would Apply to Colum 2 Reduction of one or rare species listed on the New York _ or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of mY oartion of a critical or significant wild. — life hnbt tat. . _ 40olication of Pesticide or herb Iciju over mons than _ bice A vearother than {pr d'Y'<➢ILYryI PYrPp{nS. _ - X n.i.r i,-pacts: cannot answer until inventor _ is completed _ 9. BILL PROJECT SU9STA'ITIALLY AFFECT IiON.7HREATE71E0 OR NO YES ENOANGERED SPECIES? ................. Example teat Mould Apply to Colum 2 OO Y Froiect mould substantially interfere witn any resident X X °dui9iltlPg cbnnbgf'z14{A pnw:- _ Project reouir5 'ne r.mpvel of rare ".an i^ acres of _ ,ature 'crest (over 1^,0 n en,) or Oyer 1cUlly lroorcant vegetation. s L PALL Tn -OTE!ITIAL CA: (;'PACT 3E . OERATE LARGE REDUCE➢ 9Y I'*ACT eITACT PROJECT r�ANGr 10. WILL THE 0*rJFCT AFrZC7 ylr;q, yISTAS C.1 111F vTSDAL "A YES CHARACTER OF THE UFIGHBnRwrO OR CO"•'IITv? .............. O Eaammles that %'ould Apply to Colum 2 .Y_ An incompatible visual affect caused by the introHuction �y y of ner materials, colors and/or forms in contrast jo the LimundJno Landscape. La er two- for + homes compar d o existing one-sfgry smalsl cc tages. Y A project easily visible, not easily screened.that Is X X obviously different frpn nthyrS around it, project Will result in the elimination or ,ajar screeslnq of scenic viers or vistas known to be Important to the area. Other Impacts: IMPACT On RISTORIC RESOURCES 11. WILL PROJECT II'PACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC. NO YES PRE-HISTnOIC OR PALEONTOrICAL IrMPTANCE? .................0�"` Exam)as that 'Hauld Aooly to Cal urn 2 `f Pm tett oceurine rholij or nartially within Or contiouops to any facility or site listed on the National Resister of historic places. Any impact to an archeological site or fossil bed located .ithin the project site. _ Other 'impacts: cannott affirm until :inventory is completed IrPACT 74 OVEN SPACE 3 RECREATION 12. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTLIG NO YES OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES?...... O Examples that 'dould Apply to Colum 2 N The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational oonartunitY. _ N A major ".duction of an open space important to the comunity. Y other immacts: An addition recreation burder. X X of 23 year-round homes IrvaC' IN raANEPC a?A;1C'1 IO. I'!LL THERE 3E AN EFFECT TO EXISTTNC TRANSPORTATION NO YES SYSTc'S7 ............................................... 00 'Awales :^at Gould Annly to Column 2 Alteration of present oatte rns of revement of neaple and/or goads. Y aro'ect 11 result " sever_ trsf'lc ^.rppl ems. Intersection— g_ of Sage Blvd. and Route 25 (Main Road) _y_ :tner --ac:s: Significant increase of traffic X (year-round) on Sage B1vd.Also Sage Blvd. having only one (1) means of ingress and egress 3 SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAR IMPACT CE Is00ERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT PIPACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON ENERGY la, WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COM1il1NITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR No YES ENERr.Y SUPPLY? ...........................................©O Examples that Would Apply to Colum 2 Project causing greater than 5% increase in any form of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences. Other impacts: IMPACT ON NOISE 15. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, NOISE, GLARE. VIBRATION 40 YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ....0 Examples that Would Aooly to Column 2 LL- Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. N Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). N Project will Produce ooerating noise exceedine the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. N Project will remove natural Carriers that would act as a _ noise lcreen. X Other impacts: Noise during demolition and construction _ X IMPACT ON HEALTH S wAZAPOS N0 YFS 16. HILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH ANO SAFETY? ............G O Examoles that Hould Apply to Colum 2 `-W.l Project will cause a risk of exvlosion or re'ease of ha2ardous substances (i.e. Oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation. etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will he a chronic low level discharge or enission. Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" (i.e, toxic, poisonous. highly reactive, radioactive, irritating. infectious, etc. , includinq wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases.) Stance facilities for one million or more qallnns of liquified natural gas or other liquids. Itner imoacts: ."A .07ErT:AL CA', .wr,C, EE OE^PATE LA 0.1,,E RECUCEO 3Y . pCT 111VAC7 PROJECT ANG' I-DACT ON CSfTH :NO :'ARAC-72 Me n-y.-Y ^o rr^PP^Puh^r 17. WILL P2n_JECT AF----.T 71HE C:-APACT P nF THE EXISTING 40 YES CC9MUNITY? ................................................0 Example that Would Apply to Col�ynn 2 _ The population of the City, Tom or Village in which the project is located is likely to arae by mare than 5S of resident human population. The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera- X ting services will increase by more than 55 per Year as a result of this project. Increase in police, fire, and ambulance and poss. burder on sanitary landfill Will involve any permanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove nri,re agricultural lamas from cultivation. _ The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, _ structures or areas of historic importance to the czrimunity. Development will induce an influx of a Particular age __ group with special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future projects. _ Project will relocate 15 or more employees in one or rare businesses. Other impacts: 40 YES 18. :S THERE PUBLIC CJNTRCVEPSY COKERNIAG THE PROJECT? ... .. 00 Examcles twat Wm'Would Apply to Column 2 Eitner government or-citizens of adjace^.t communities I g have expressed occositicn or rejectec the oroiect or nave not peen contacted. Y Cbtections to the rro�ect from within the community. _� I _ X F :F ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS :CUIIFCEO AS A ME:7TIAL LARrE IMPAC CR IF YOU CANNOT CE-7 .414E 7HE "AGNITUCE OF :MPACT, PROCEED 70 PART j. PORTIONS OF :AF C:HPLETEO FCR THIS FRCJ---. DETER-I5ATION PART I � X PART I: _ X PART ; X_ Upon review of the info„ration recorded on this EAR (Parts 1, 2 and j) and consider,nd Pain the -acnitude and imnortance of each 'moa<:, it Is reasonaoly detenined that: oREDIRE A 117171V! C6:LARAIIC9 A. 'he o";ect oil! result in r0 ^.djor ieoaats and, therefore, O ,s one onion lay not ause sicnif'.cant :amace to :ne environment. 3. -1:hcucn :roiect -.old ^ave a s:cnificant effect :n :ne envirorrent, e 9111 not :e a sigpificantfIn :his case tecause :re mil,,,atiom -easures 2^sc,-ced in 3.1T3 raYe nein O 'nc!•,ced as oar• of ' e oro_ased as proposed , .. "e :ro'ec%oilatult one or -ore "d'pr adae,Se i-vac's ._-•.o.E =CE:-:'/r ---.S cahnc. _e Civet ro -a;! c]us2 S•nni°•C]^. 12-a,- :.. /1^ a 2I - 1c3: a C - • EAF EfIVIROHMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART III IFVAUATION OF THE TMfRTAYCE OF IMPAC INFORMATION . Part 3 is prepared if ane or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially lane. - The amount of writing necessary to answer part 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of rm decisions? INSTRUCTIONS Complete the followinq for each impact or effect identified in Colon 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than large meati by a pro- ject change. 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonahle to conclude that this irmact is important to the minicipality (city, town or village) in which the project is located. To answer the question of importance, consider- - The probability of the impact or effect occurring - The duiatlon of the impact or effect Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources or values - Whether the impact or effect can be controlled . The regional consequence of the impact or effect - Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the pnject anoly to this impact or effect. DETERMINATION OF SIGiIFIUBCE An action is considered to be significant if: nne (or more) impact is determined to both lame and its (their) consequence, based an the review above, is important. — PAPT III STATEMENTS (Continue on Attachments, as needed) eDACep'Si— A"N atl 44�vhii �u��4, y+E + ad t,ttl sv t+"rf`tl�( E i^M1,' ��iP3 rP tl }i Mt„4+'kr sF ,P PIi� k y o .}h I i f f' wj. i PI iek �ikyyy++ it i(^ =PSS: Ia� ',u? it+i° ,tIR �9t •d{ F tlt C"� I� � � �V�f is 4P r _ti I� k tri WI 4 3.EP M3iit��r�nt'' � 4iim H IPfr a,t�ia '46(at`ilsa vT t }kPr�l-bN u IN4 y 1rf4u II4 ,E,. � S ar°'P s r�dBPFP' . xPk-, ^d `PHIk�} ; Ydrr tl s tea th 3 i` yE tl - k e v t t 1Ik u I tl pp to w' i q � ,� h r x,kw t � �i�t��y i :+EF E ,5t dS Vy"t 2'° hw iv �".yi'tiw'7,( t d �He' 4 iI M� i�aj�w 4a 0t iv+k°""y-t 6 ki,rl I` : 4 N 2 E W E.h4I t 3 A +{ 'I :I 'tl M1' 3 4 y l S'aa $ E (� t kG Hk t t "m w ++; a :eek �Ie,i eI I .' >II . 1. Cover Sheet ntroduction All EIS's(Draft or Final)shall begin with a cover sheet that indicates: The followingchecklist of topics is intended as a starting point for developing a detailed scope ✓'A. Whether it is a draft final statement for a project-specific Draft Environmental Impact w- ' . Name or other descriptive title of the project Statement. Typically, no one project will requi ✓C re a . Location(county and town, village or city)of discussion of all the topic areas contained in this the project document. Through the scoping process, this list of ✓ D. Name and address of the lead agency which required preparation of the statement and topics should be refined to reflect issues unique to the name and telephone number of person the proposed project. Topic areas may be deleted, added, or elaborated upon, to arrive at the final o the agency to be contacted for further ther in- f scoping document. formation 4.E. Name and address e the preparers of any The purpose of the checklist format is to portion of the statement identify the basic topic areas for the Draft EIS. This nt and a contact name is accomplished by reviewing the list and placing a and telephone number �p1� check in the box located to the left of those topics F. Date of acceptance of the Draft EIS cd4kk- ✓G. In the case of a Draft EIS, the deadline date which should be discussed. The model scoping by which comments are due should be in- checklist can also be used as a worksheet, including dicated 91"k- comments, suggestions and identification of the particular example(s) that are relevant to a detailed H. Table of Contents and Summary discussion of the topic or issue that has been check- A table of contents and a brief summary are re- ed. Conversely, those topics which are not checked, quired for Draft and Final EIS's exceeding 10 pages are issues not associated with the project, and may in length. However, one should include these be eliminated from discussion in the Draft EIS. features in any size EIS to provide the review agency Minimum requirements for any Draft EIS are with easy reference to EIS topics. already checked for convenience. The summary should include: The next step is to expand the list to include L. A. Brief description of the action or elaborate on those topics unique to the proposed 46� B Significant, beneficial and adverse impacts, project. A blank sheet is included at the end of the (issues of controversy must be specified) checklist for such additional information. v C. Mitigation measures proposed The scoping process involves several steps in ✓7D. Alternatives considered addition to compiling a list of topics. Scoping also V£ Matters to be decided (permits, approvals, includes discussiors on the quantity and quality of information required and the methods for obtaining funding) that data. 111. Description ofthe Proposed Action NOTE: This checklist was designed to be ! Place a check int a ox tot e left of those used in conjunction with the section on scoping con- topics to be included in the draft EIS. tained in the SEQR Guideline-Draft and Final EIS's. X A. PROJECT PURPOSE AND NEED j It is also important to emphasize that this checklist ✓' 1. Background and history should serve only as a model to assist in the scoping ✓' 2. Public need for the project, and of a Draft EIS. It should not be used as a substitute municipality objectives based on adopted for actively scoping a Draft EIS for a specific pro- community development plans ject. ✓3. Objectives of the project sponsor C-1 B. LOCATION Natural Resources t.-1. Establish geographic boundaries of the A. GEOLOGY project (use of regional and local scale maps is recommended) 1. Subsurface ✓'2. Description of access to site . a.)composition and thickness of ✓3. Description of existing zoning of propos- subsurface material ed site examples: 4. Other: =depth to, and nature of, bed- rock formations and imperme- C. DESIGN AND LAYOUT able layers ✓]. Total site area —occurrence of an extractive mineral resource .�a.)proposed impervious surface area —usefulness as construction (roofs, parking lots, roads) material vb.)amount of land to be cleared b.)earthquake potential ✓t:.)open space ✓2. Structures ® 2. Surface a.)gross leaseable area (GLA), if ap. ✓a.) list of soil types plicable ✓b.)discussion of soil characteristics ✓b.)layout of buildings (attached, enclos- examples: ed, separate) —physical properties (indication c.)site plans and profile views of soils hydrological (infiltra- 3. Parking tion) capabilities) a.)pavement area —engineering properties (soil b.)number of spaces and layout bearing capacity) 4. Other: vc.) distribution of soil types at pro- ject site D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION vd.)suitability for use ✓f. Construction examples: a.)total construction period anticipated —agriculture b.)schedule of construction —recreation c.)future potential development, on site —construction or on adjoining properties —mining d.)other: e.) other: 2. Operation 3. Topography a.)type of operation ,. a.) description of topography at pro- b.)schedule of operation ject site c.)other: examples: —slopes ❑ E. CLOSURE AND POST CLOSURE PLANS —prominent or unique features (for projects of planned limited life such as vb.)description of topography of sur- landfills) rounding area ® F. APPROVALS ® B. WATER RESOURCES ✓1. Required changes or variances to the zon- 1. Groundwater ing regulations y.a.) location and description of ✓2. Other permit approval or funding re- aquifers and recharge areas quirements examples: v—depth to water table ✓+—seasonal variation IV. Environmental Setting y-quality Place a check in the box to the left of those ,-—quantity topics to be included in the Draft EIS. v —flow C-2 ✓b.)identification of present uses and c.) identification of any sensitive level of use of groundwater receptors in project area examples: examples: —location of existinq wells —hospitals, schools, nursing ✓—public/private water supply homes, parks —industrial uses d.)description of existing monitor- -agricultural uses ing program (if applicable) 2. Surface water ✓a.) location and description of sur- D. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY face waters located on project 1. Vegetation site or those that may be in- `,a.) list vegetation types on the pro- fluenced by the project ject site and within the surround- examples: ing area �—seasonal variation J).)discussion of site vegetation _'quality characteristics examples: ✓—classification according to New York State Department of %,—speciespecies present and abundance —age Health V—size identification of uses and level of �') �—distribution use of all surface waters U—dominance examples: . —community types public/private water supply v—unique, rare and endangered —industrial uses —agricultural uses species —a g v value as habitat for wildlife 'recreation ✓—productivity c.) description of existing drainage F"Kh Wa('W areas, patterns and channels 2. Fish-ar Wildlife// d.)discussion of potential for �_a.) list of fiskrawd`wildlif species on flooding, siltation, erosion and the project site an within sur- eutrophication of water sources rounding area, including migratory and resid nt species ❑ C. AIR RESOURCES �b.)discussion of f. wildlife ❑ 1. Climate population characteristics examples: a.)discussion of seasonal variations species present and abundance and extremes --distribution examples: --dominance —temperature —humidity --unique, rare and endangered species —precipitation - —wind —productivity 3. Wetlands ❑ 2. Air quality .tea.) list wetland areas within or Ion- a.) description of existing air quality tiguous to the project site levels --b.)discuss wetland characteristics examples: examples: —list the National and State Air "�--acreage Quality Standards for the pro- '—vegetative cover ject area and the compliance classification status for each standard —benefits of wetland such as b.) identification of existing sources flood and erosion control, or pollutants-fixed or mobile recreation C-3 Human Resources ® C. COMMUNITY SERVICES(for this section in- clude a list of existing facilities and a discus- sion of existing levels of usage and pro- 1. Transportation services jected future needs) ,,A.)description of the size, capacity and condition of services ® 1. Educational facilities examples: ® 2. Police protection —roads, canals, railroads, ® 3. Fire protection bridges —parking facilities 4. Health care facilities —traffic control ® 5. Social services mob.)description of current level of use �] 6. Recreational facilities of services examples: ® 7. Utilities —a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic ❑ g. Other: flow —vehicle mix —sources of existing traffic U D. DEMOGRAPHY volume '® 1. Population characteristics ❑ 2. Public transportation , discussion of the existing popula- a.)description of the current tion parameters availability of service examples: b.)description of present level of —distribution C use "i..—density ❑ 3. Pedestrian environment —household size and composi- ❑ 4. Other: tion ✓b.)discussion of projections for B. LAND USE AND ZONING population growth ❑ 2. Other: 1. Existing land use and zoning a.)description of the existing land use of the project site and the ® E. CULTURAL RESOURCES surrounding area 1. Visual resources examples: a.)description of the physical " commercial L--' character of the community ./—residential example: ✓ agricultural —urban vs. rural ":—business b.)description of natural areas of ✓—retail `l significant scenic value ✓—industrial �) identification of structures of ✓—vacant significant architectural design �)description of the existing zoning of site and surrounding area ® 2. Historic and archaeological resources ® 2. Land use plans a.) location and description of „a.) description of any land use plans v historic areas or structures listed or master plans which include on State or National Register or project site and surrounding area designated by the community ✓ b.)discussion offuture developmentb. identification of sites having trends or pressures L�potential significant ar. ❑ 3. Other: chaeological value C-4 ❑ 3. Noise B. WATER RESOURCES a.) identification of existing level of 1. Groundwater noise in the community a.)design adequate system of treat- b. identification of major sources of ment for stormwater runoff prior noise to recharge of groundwater examples: b.)maintain permeable areas on the —airports site —major highways c.) institute a program for monitor- -industrial/commercial facili- ing water quality in adjacent ties wells ❑ 4. Other: d.)other: 2. Surface water a.)ensure use of soil erosion control V. Significant Environmental Impacts techniques during construction Identify those aspects of the environmental set- and operation to avoid siltation ting in Section !V that may be adversely or examples: beneficially affected by the proposed action and re- —hay bales quire discussion. —temporary restoration of 1. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmen- vegetation to disturbed areas tal Impact —landscaping escribe measures to reduce or avoid potential b.)design adequate stormwater con- C adverse impacts identified in Section V. The follow- trol system ing is a brief listing of typical measures used for c.) restrict use of salt or sand for some of the major areas of impact. 1• road and parking area snow All 1YNQt-5A4*?.5 ive (obe_to 6jWeJ removal Natural Resources d.)avoid direct discharges to surface water resources A. GEOLOGY e.)other: 1. Subsurface a.) use excavated material for land reclamation b.)use facility wastes (ash, sludge) for land reclamation ❑ C. AIR RESOURCES c.) other: 1. Air quality 2. Surface a.)assure proper construction prac- a.) use topsoil stockpiled during tices construction for restoration and examples: landscaping —fugitive dust control b.)minimize disturbance of non- —proper operation and construction sites maintenance of construction c.)design and implement soil ero- equipment sion control plan b.)design traffic improvements to d.)other: reduce congestion and vehicle 3. Topography delay a.) avoid construction on areas of c.) install and ensure the proper steep slope operation of emission control b.)design adequate soil erosion devices devices to protect areas of steep d.)initiate a program for monitoring slope of air quality c.) other: e.)other: C-5 D. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Vegetation 1. Existing land use and zoning a.) restrict clearing to only those a.)design project to comply with ex- areas necessary isting land use plans b.)preserve part of site as a natural b.)design functional and visually ap- area pealing facility to set standard c.)after construction, landscape site and precedent for future with naturally occurring vegeta- surrounding land use tion c.)other: d.)purchase open space at another [ C. COMMUNITY SERVICES location and dedicate to local 1. Police protection government or conservation a.) minimize local police protection organization responsibilities by providing e.)other: private security force 2. Fish and Wildlife b.)provide security systems, alarms a.) provide adequate habitat(shelter for facility and food) for remaining wildlife c.) provide equipment, funds or ser- species vices directly to the community b.)schedule construction to avoid d.)other: sensitive periods of fish and 2. Fire protection wildlife life cycles a.)use construction materials that c.)other: minimize fire hazards b.)incorporate sprinkler and alarm systems into building design c.) provide equipment, funds or ser- Human Resources vices directly to the community A. TRANSPORTATION 3 .) i other: . UUtilities 1. Transportation services a.) i n s t a I I utility services a.)design adequate and safe access underground to project site to handle pro- b.)incorporate water saving fixtures jected traffic flow into facility design b.)install adequate traffic control c.) incorporate energy-saving devices measures into facility design c.)optimize use of parking areas d.)other: d.)encourage car pooling and opera- D. CULTURAL RESOURCES tion of facility during non-peak 1. Visual resources traffic times a.) design exterior of structure to e.)design special routing and restricted hours for delivery truck physically blend with existing traffic surroundings f.) other: b.)minimize visual impact through 2. Public transportation thoughtful and innovative design a.) adjust public transportation of lighting and signs (consider: routes and schedules to service height, size, intensity, glare and the facility hours of lighting operation) design landscaping to be visually b.)encourage use of public transpor- c.) talion by using incentive pro- pleasing and to serve as a buffer grams for employees or by sell- between surrounding land uses, parking tickets in facility parking areas, operational equip- c.)other: meet and facilities d.)other: C-6 2. Historic and archaeologic resources A. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND a.) allow historical and ar- TECHNOLOGIES chaeological officials access to A. Site layout the project site during excavation ✓' a.)density and location of structures b.)devote space within project site ✓b.)location of access routes, park- to a display of historical and ar- ing and utility routes chaeological artifacts of local in- v2. Orientation terest t, a.)compatibility with slope and c.) preserve architecturally signifi- drainage patterns cant structures and make a tib.)site size and setback re- photographic and statistical quirements record of those that must be 3. Technology destroyed a.)pollution control equipment d.)other: b.)innova tive vs. proven 3. Noise technologies a.)schedule construction/operation 4. Mix of activities to occur during "normal a.)addition of businesses which business" hours minimizing would affect the operational noise impact during sensitive nature of the facility times (early morning, night) b.)assure adherence to construction noise standards B. ALTERNATIVE SITES c.)design berms and landscaping to ✓ 1. Limiting factors,okywr.'�P block and absorb noise tea.)availability of land d.)other: ✓b.)suitability of alternate site to ac- comodate design requirements ,c.)availability of utilities ✓d.)suitable market area ✓e.)compatibility with local zoning VII. Adv ran Environmental Effects that Cannot and master plan be Avoided if the Project is Implemented L.- f.) compatibility with regional ob- Identify those adverse environmental effects in jectives Section V that can be expected to occur regardless ✓g.)accessibility of site to transporta- of the mitigation measures considered in Section tion routes and the service VI. population ® C. ALTERNATIVE SIZE ✓1'. Increase or decrease project size to minimize possible impacts VIII. Alternatives ✓2. Increase or decrease project size to correspond to market and com- This section contains categories of alternatives munity needs with examples. Discussion of each alternative should be at a level sufficient to permit a com- parative assessment of costs, benefits and en- D. ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION/OPERA- vironmental risks for each alternative. It is not ac- TION SCHEDULING ceptable to make simple assertions that a particular ✓7. Commence construction at a dif- alternative is or is not feasible. Identify those ferent time categories of alternatives which should be included ✓2. Phase construction/operation in the EIS by placing a check in the box located to Restrict construction/operation the left of the topic. work schedule C-7 . L r..�•pti�ibl�.u.{ >ec�6r"�S 3�""� E. ALTERNATIVE LAND USE ^ XI. Effects on the Use and Conservation of Eeergy 1. Suitability of site for other uses Resources a.) other types of commercial uses d�entry the energy sources to be used, an- b.)other types of industry ticipated levels of consumption and ways to reduce c.) different types of housing energy consumption. The examples listed below are d.)other: typical issues to be considered when addressing this 2. Public vs. private use topic. F. NO ACTION ❑ A. PROPOSED ENERGY SOURCES AND 1. Impacts of no action ALTERNATIVES a.)effect on public need b.)effect on private developers'need ❑ B. ANTICIPATED SHORT-TERM/LONG-TERM c.)beneficial or adverse en- LEVELS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION vironmental impacts ❑ C. INDIRECT EFFECTS ON ENERGY CON- SUMPTION ❑ G. OTHER: 1. Increased dependence on automobile use IX. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of 2. Increased levels of traffic due to pro- Resources posed project Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section IV that will be consumed, converted or ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES made unavailable for future use. 1. Design methods to reduce fuel use ` 1 for heating, cooling, and lighting C X. Growth Inducing Aspects a.)conventional technology Describe in this section the potential growth examples: aspects the proposed project may have. Listed —insulation below are examples of topics that are typically af- —thermopane windows fected by the growth induced by a project. —use of low wattage lights NZ A. POPULATION b.)innovative technology 1. Increases in business and resident examples: population due to the creation or —heat pumps relocation of business —solar panels 2. Increases in resident population due —wind energy to the construction of housing —use of waste heat from an in- dustrial plant B. SUPPORT FACILITIES c.)efficient layout 1. Businesses created to serve the in- examples: creased population —orientation of structures in 2. Service industries created to supply relation to summer and winter new facility sunlight —clustering of structures to C. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL maximize common walls 1Introduction or improvement of in- —shortening of utility runs t/ frastruc[ure (roads, waste disposal, —shared insulation and heating sewers, water) to service proposed 2. Indirect energy benefits project a.) location and design of facility to Creation of further growth potential accomodate mass transit by construction of improved in- b.)use of shuttle buses frastructure c.) location of facility to minimize travel distance ❑ D. OTHER: ❑ E. OTHER: C-8 C XII. Appendices Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the EIS. A. List of underlying studies, reports and infor- mation considered and relied on in preparing state. ment B. List all federal, state, regional, or local agen- cies, organizations, consultants and private persons consulted in preparing the statement C. Technical exhibits (if any) at a legible scale D. Relevant correspondence regarding the pro- jects may be included (required in the Final EIS) Additional Draft EIS Scoping Topics Indicate any additional topics for discussion in the Draft EIS. Attach additional sheets if necessary. C9 • ,GU Rt( „z� • P It�I. N G Q AR D T7VVT O O QLD E)L Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 2 , 1986 Mr. Henry E.Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Breezey Shores Dear Mr. Raynor: Please let this confirm the following action taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, May 19 , 1986 . WHEREAS, Bayview Development Corp. has heretofore applied to the Southold Town Planning Board for a subdivision of 83 . 118 acres into 23 residential building lots in the cluster concept located at Sage Blvd. , Greenport, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS : 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Planning Board , as lead agency, does hereby detrmine that the action proposed is a Type I action and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Planning Board shall file and circulate such determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. 3. That the Planning Board immdeiately notify the applicant, Bayview Development Corp. , of this determination, and further request said applicant to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, in accordance with the scope and contents required by the Planning Board and Town Planner, all in accordance with said law, rules and code. Please let this also confirm that the scoping session has been set for 11 : 00 a.m. on Friday, June 6 at the Town Hall with the Town Planner. Henry E. Ryanor, Jr. Page 2 6/2/86 ------------------------------------------------------------ Enclosed, for your review is a copy of the Town Planner ' s Part II and Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Please contact this office if you have any questions . Very truly yours , SnL O� `QfI )4 BES , J�. SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. jPj*D TD Ln Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 SCOPING SESSION "BREEZEY SHORES" A Scoping Session was held at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold at 11: 00 (actually began at 11: 25 a.m. ) on June 6 , 1986 , with regard to the above mentioned subdivison. Present were: Town Planner David Emilita Councilman Paul Stoutenbourgh Henry E. Raynor, agent for applicant Joseph Demma - Newsday Reporter Henry Wiessman - Neighbor Melissa Spiro - Planning Intern Frank Flynn - neighbor Richard Mohring - principal Jeffrey Forchelli- principal and attorney for application Mr. Emilita: Okay, I would like to get started here. Mr. Forchelli: Are you the Town Planner? Mr . Emilita: My firm is. Szepatowski Associates. Mr. Forchelli: Would you spell that please and could I have the address. Mr. Emilita: S-Z-E-P-A-T-O-W-S-K-I , and the address is 23 Narragansett Avenue, Jamestown, Rhode Island. Mr. Forchelli: Are you a PE? Mr. Emilita: AICP. Mr. Forchelli: What does that stand for? Mr. Emilita: American Institute of Certified Planners . Charter Member. Mr. Forchelli : And what kind of degree do you need for that? Scoping Session Breezey Shores Page 2 6/6/86 Mr. Emilita: National certification. Mr. Forchelli : I just saw today. We submitted an assessment form. . . Mr. Emilita: Part I . Mr. Forchelli : With additional information on November 5 or whatever date you received it. And, so then until this positive declaration was made from November through May there were no declaratins made on this in the interium. Am I correct? Mr. Emilita: That is correct , as far as I know. Mr. Forchelli: Now the purpose of this meeting is scoping out what you want in the Environmental Impact Statement. Mr. Emilita: I will bring us to the present date. First off, not all of us know each other here so I would like to go around the table and introduce ourselves for the record. My name is David Emilita, Consulting Planner to the Town. Councilman Stoutenbourgh- Paul Stoutenbourgh, Councilman to the Town Board. Henry Raynor: Henry Raynor, agent for the proposed subdivision. Mr. Demma: Joe Demma, Newsday. Mr. Drum: Henry Drum Mr. Weissman: Henry Weissman, neighbor Ms . Spiro: Melissa Spiro, Planning Intern Mr. Flynn: Frank Flynn, neighbor Mr. Mohring: Richard Mohring, principal Mr. Forchelli: Jeff Forchelli, attorney and principal Mr. Emilita: To bring us to the present date on May 5 the Southold Town Planning Board took the following action, Resolved that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act for the subdivision to be known as "Breezey Shores" located at Sage Boulevard, Greenport for 23 lotson 81 acres . " On May 19 , Notice of Significant Effect on the Environment was made pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 , of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code. The Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency does hereby determine that the action as described below is a Type I action and is likely to have a significant on the environment. The description of the actionis the same as I just made. On June 2 , letter from Chairman Orlowski was sent to Mr. Raynor, as agent informing him of the determination or notice rather made on May 19 and stating the following. Whereas, Scoping Session Page 3 • 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr.Emilita: Bayview Development Corp. has heretofore applied to the Southold Town Planning Board for subdivision of 83. 11 8 acres into 23 residential building lots in the cluster concept located at Sage Boulevard, Greenport. Now, therefore, be it resolved as follows : That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the ECL Part 617 of Title 6 of the NY Codes and Rules and Regulations and chapter 44 of the Town Code the Planning Baord as lead agency does hereby determine that the action proposed, is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. That was point No. 1, point No. 2 Planning Board shall file and circulate the determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. Three, that the Planning Board notify the applicant, Bayview Development Corp. of the determination and further request that said applicant prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with the scope and contents required by the Planning Board, Town Planner all in accordance with said rules , law and code. Please let this also confirm that the scoping session has been set for 11: 00 a.m. , Friday, June 6 at the Southold Town Hall which is were we are today. Any questions? Mr. Forchelli: Yes, Is there any particular reason why there was a delay from November until May in doing this. It seems to be violative of the Environmental Conservation Law and the Rules and Regulations . Mr. Emilita: There was no delay. There was a time lapse, yes , during which time the submissions were reviewed and early questions were formed. And the Planning Board' s deliberations resulted in its desire to have a yield map produced in order to show what would be the true yield of the land. Mr. Forchelli: A yield map between November 7 and March 5 was submitted. So you are saying that between November 7 and March 5 that how long it took to decide that they wanted a yield map. Mr. Emilita: This is not the only application, which the Board has to approve. Mr. Forchelli : And then from March 5 . . . . Mr. Emilita: If this were the only application your claim of delay might make more sense. But it isn' t and it doesn' t. Mr. Forchelli : So, in other words the Board is very busy so that the fact that the time passed here is not of concern. Mr.. Emilita: The East End of Long Island is exploding with development and Board ' s with no staff in particular are under stress to produce reasonably deliberate responses. Mr. Forchelli: So, in other words if you under delay. . . Mr. Emilita: There was no delay. Scoping Session Page 4 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Forchelli: . . . then the time limit set forth in the Environmental Conservation Laws don' t apply. Mr. Emilita: There was no delay. I object to the inference of a delay on anybody' s part. Mr. Forchelli: Again, so you just don' t feel bound by the time limit in the Environmental Conservation Law, the fifteen days I am referring to. Mr.. Emilita: what 15 days? Mr. Forchelli: The 15 day period to act on the submission. Mr. Emilita: What specific 15 day period are you talking about? Mr. Forchelli: I submitted to you an environmental assessment form and nothing happened until March. Mr. Emilita: There is no 15 day period. Mr. Forchelli: Okay, then let' s move ahead. Mr. Emilita: You are incorrect in referring to one. Mr. Forchelli: Well, wether I am incorrect or not. I don' t know if you or I have the ability to say that. Mr. Emilita: There is no time period and if you know the rules and regulations you will know that there is no time period involved. Mr. Forchelli: Let' s move ahead then. Now, we have this letter this form which I saw today, this Environmental Assessment Form. Is this what we are going to be discussing today? Mr. Emilita: That will form the basis of the discussion from which we will move using Appendix A of the handbook put out by the DEC and using the outline in Appendix A to form the outline of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. This is the model checklist, this is the model checklist for the DEIS. This is not a checklist for a DEIS, this is a model checklist. This is simply a form that we have to complete for the Board to make a SEQRA Declaration. Mr. Forchelli : So, in other words , these items that a part of Part III , the 14 points, these form the basis for the decision to positive dec this? And these were prepared by you? Mr. Emilita: Yes . Mr. Forchelli: And these apply to this property or any property? Scoping Session Page 5 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Emilita: Obviously they apply to this property only. Mr. Forchelli: This property only? Mr. Emilita: Yes . Mr. Forchelli: Okay. So, now what are your going to do, tell us what you want in the Environmental Impact Statement? Mr. Emilita: We are going to establish what the scope of impact statement will be, based on the checklist, based on the analysis of the Part II and Part III. This , I hope, will be a cooperative discussion back and forth, so we all agree what it is we need to look at and what it is that we don' t have to look at. That is the purpose of this scoping session so we don' t get an EIS this big or one that is that big. We get one that is appropriate to the genuine concerns of the project so that someone can ' t come along later and say I wasn' t aware why didn' t you look at this. All those questions will be answered right here and now today. I ' ll go through this item by item for those of you who are not familiar with the scoping session. This may draw it out a little bit but I think we would like to go through these steps and not have to retrace them again. Okay. First, obviously you need a cover sheet and all EIS ' s or Draft EIS ' s shall begin with a cover that states whether it is a draft or final statment and in this case it' s a final . A name or other descriptive title of the project. The location meaning the Town of this project, the name. . . Mr. Forchelli: Dave, Dave, we are familiar. . . Mr. Emilita: I 'm doing this for the record, if you don' t mind. I said I would like to go through this once and then we don' t have to retrace our steps again. Mr. Forchelli: Okay. Mr. Emilita: The name and address of the lead which requied the preparation of the statement and the name and telephone number of the person at the agency to be contacted for further information. The name and address of the prepares of an7 portion of the statement and a contact name and telephone number. The date of acceptance of the Draft EIS and that will remain blank until the Town has reviewed the submission and determined it to be adequate and sufficient for review as a Draft. In the case of the Draft EIS, the deadline date by which comments are due and that shall remain blank until such time as the Town accepts the EIS. Two-Table of Contents and Summary: A table of contents and a brief summary are required for Draft and Final EIS ' s which exceeds 10 pages in length and I assume this one will. However, should, one should include these featues in any size EIS . Okay, the summary should include brief description of the action, the significant, beneficial and adverse impacts of the action, Scopping Session Page 6 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Emilita: issues of controversy must be specified, the mitigation measures proposed, the alternatives considered and the matters to be decided, permits, approvals , funding. Okay, Item Three, Roman Three, Item A the Project Purpose and Need- Item No. 1 Background and History- here we would like to get into the history of the site a little bit as what we see topography and physically on this site as resulted from its past use and the physical character of the surface and subsurface is as a result of what ' s there, what the site has been used for. It would be helpful to frame what' s happened here and what will happen here and some of that. Mr. Forchelli: Can I ask a question? Mr. Emilita: Sure. Mr. Forchelli : You asked about subsurface, in areas that are going to be left as open space you don' t want us to send machines in there to dig test holes do you? Mr. Emilita: At some point in time test wells or test holes may be required for various purposes . We are not going to expect you to do that now in as far as youare able to describe the subsurface conditions without it. Mr. Forchelli : So, in other words, what you are saying in this area here, you may at a future date want us to sample some of that. Mr. Emilita: I doubt that. We are talking about possible construction in areas which are shown as wetlands. Mr. Forchelli: Well, this is not the plan, this is the yield, why don' t we look at the plan. Mr. Emilita: Okay. Mr. Forchelli : This 31 acres here is open space alright nothing will happen with this . Are you saying that some time you may want us to make a determination as to what' s underneath? Mr. Emilita: By construction aroung the wetlands , we will need to know . . . . Mr. Forchelli: I don' t think shows construction, I think this shows a 50 ' right-of-way , the Town does not require you to pave 50 ' . Mr. Emilita: They might. Mr. Forchelli: They might. Mr. Emilita: You wouldn' t have 50 ' pavement, you would have 50 ' right-of-way. Scoping Session Page 7 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr Forchelli: That is what I said. I said that the Town wouldn' t require us to pave 50 ' and you said they might. Mr. Emilita: I said within that 50 ' , but if this road has to be at a sufficient elevation not to flood, we are talking about filling at least to the extent of the right of way and possibly beyond, we need to know if what exists can support and what are the impacts . Mr. Forchelli: There is an existing road there now so would you want to know how many times a month the existing road floods. Mr. Emilita: Yes , that existing road for the purposes of this development is not sufficient. There for the purposes of this development, you will have to construct a road and that involves construction. That takes care of background and history. Two- public need for the project, and municipality objectives based on adopted community development plans . Mr. Forchelli: Let me ask you a question with respect to that. Behind me, is this the proposed Master Plan? Mr. Emilita: That is the proposed zoning map. Mr. Forchelli: The Proposed zoning map? Mr. Emilita: Yes. Mr. Forchelli : They have on part of this property as marine recreational. Mr. Emilita: Marine Business Mr. Forchelli : It says here Marine Rec. Mr. Emilita: It' s the map on the top. Mr. Forchelli: On the top, it's MB? So how do we handle that or do we make believe that it doesn' t exist, and it ' s under the existing zoning? Mr. Emilita; Well, right now you are coming in under the existing zoning and that is proposed so we are talking about the existing zoning. Mr. Forchelli: So, we should just ignore that? Mr. Emilita: For the present time, yes . Mr. Forchelli: Is there any plan or schedule for adopting that? Mr. Emilita: There is no schedule for adopting that. It is under consideration and there is no schedule, to my knowledge. Scoping Session Page 8 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Emilita: So we are coming in under existing zoning. Item No. 3 -Objectives of the project sponsor - what do you expect to accomplish with this development. Again, still under Roman Numeral Three, Description, Major Item B - Location - One - Establish the geographic boundaries of the project. I believe we have done that. Two- describe the access to the site. That would be the existing access road. Three - describe the existing zoning of proposed site. Now, this project complies with the existing zoning. Okay, under Location I don' t think we need any more data at this time. Okay, Item C, Major Item C - Design and Layout. I think we have listed here the total area of the site, we need the proposed impervious surface area, in other roads , roof tops and any other hard surface where water will run from. B - the amount of land to be cleared for structures and impervious surfaces . C-the amount of open space to be left, undisturbed. Two - Under Structure - the , well gross leaseable area,doesn' t apply, we are talking about a residential subdivision. The number of buildings , type, the site plan which will consist of the proposed cluster subdivision and yield map, which you have already submitted. Parking we are not concerned about since these are residential lots. Any other features of the design that the applicant would wish to describe to better explain the benefits of this particular scheme over any other proposal for the site including leaving the site alone. Okay, major item D - Construction and Operation, this will be fairly important here since we are near to surface water and we may possibly be looking on some encroachment on either freash or tidal wetlands. So we need to look at the construction period that is anticipated, the time period anticipated for the project, a projected schedule of construction including phasing if any if you will not construct the whole entire project at once, we will need to know precisely what things will be happening when. And, also the construction as it relates to potential development on adjoining sites of property and as you well know there is the possiblity of reconstruction here at the marina and we have an adjacent, under two or three separate ownerships, adjacent here, here and this is part of the lot. Diane, I am pointing to the land that is identified as now or formerly of Anesthia Group and the land of Posillico James Possillico and Possillico construction. Mr. Forchelli: How about over here, this piece of property that we wrap around? Mr. Emilita: The marina. Mr. Forchelli: Isn' t this a change of zone application? Before the Town? Mr. Emilita: There is a development application now before the Town, it also requests a special exception and I believe Scoping Session Page 9 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr . Emilita: there are some variances that are requested but there is no change of zone per se for that piece of land. There is no change of zone per se, they are proceeding assumming that the application can conform or can be made to conform with the current zoning and proposed designation per se. Mr. Forchelli: Assuming that it can conform to the proposed designation? Mr. Emilita: They are trying to model that project, as far as I can understand it, so that it will fit for both the existing zoning and proposed. Mr„ Forchelli: Were they required to do the Draft EIS. Mr. Emilita: Yes . Mr. Forchelli: Now, their service road is the same that road that we are to the largest extent. Correct? Mr. Emilita: Yes . Mr. Forchelli: Did they considere all the roads, things that you are going to require us in their DEIS. Mr. Emilita: As you know, before their application is finally approved a suitable access will have to be approved. Mr. Forchelli: Right, but in their DEIS, were they required to look at this road to the extent that we are. Mr. Emilita: Yes . Mr. Forchelli : Well, if they did, presumably they submitted that information why do we have to submit it again. Mr. Emilita: You mean so far as borings? Mr. Forchelli : Well, just the reconstruction of the road. Mr. Emilita: You own this right-of-way do you not? Mr. Forchelli : Irrespect of who owns it. You said you have in here that there will substantial additional traffic, Sage Blvd. and Main Road, a major increase of year round will be introduced onto Route 25 from Sage Blvd. This increase will also cause a direct burden on Sage Blvd. being that there is only one ingress and egress . Now this is 23 house 18 of which are up in this area. Now these 18 houses are going to come out this way and according to what I read here this will be a major increase of year-round traffic and you want us to discuss paving this road out for 18 houses . Now the proposal here for a marina, a hotel , resturant, and so on I presume would have would Scoping Session Page 10 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Forchelli: more than 18 houses. And, I want to know if they have already discussed this in their DEIS or if we are doing it now on behalf of them or for some other reason, that is all I 'm asking. Mr. Emilita: You are asking this , I think, already knowing the answer that we have already held a joint meeting on the subject of this road knowing that the road would have to be jointly improved in some manner before either development would receive final approval or at least the paperwork for improving would have to be in place before final approval would be given to the project. Mr. Forchelli: Let me ask you this. . . Mr. Emilita: The precise level of improvement is yet to be determined. Mr . Forchelli : What I am asking is , alright, let me ask you another question, when I have to consider this road. . . Mr. Emilita: You own this road, you can not ask ome e else to consider a private road or some other riglt.-o-way tht they do not own. all I can do is lead the two parties together. Mr. Forchelli: In other words, the environmental law doesn' t apply to him if he doesn' t own the road? Mr. Emilita: No, no, the environmental law applies to him, what I am saying is that I cannot require him to improve something he doesn' t own. What I 'm saying is that he won ' t get his approval. Mr. Forchelli: Alright, let me ask you this. I have 18 houses that are going to come from here heading west, okay, now in considering that road for 18 housing coming out which is going to be a major increase in year round traffic according to Num ber 10 here, he has a project, am I supposed to consider what I need or am I supposed to consider what he needs? Mr. Emilita: Both have to consider joint needs . Mr. Forchelli: I 'm supposed to consider what he needs also. Okay. Mr. Emilita: Obviously. yes, and he has to consider what he needs . Mr. Forchelli: Is your answer obviously yes. Mr. Emilita: Yes, unless one of you are going to go out another way, which is also a possiblity. 0 Scoping Session Page 11 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Forchelli: How about I consider in there what I need and if he needs more, let him worry about it. What do I have to worry about him for. Mr. Emiiita: I hope that you would be a cooperative as you were at the meeting we held about a month ago. Mr. Forchelli : I am willing to discuss this with anybody, but when I here that 18 homes , 31 cottages , will have a major impact in traffic I must tell you that you are scaring me off. Mr. Emilita: I am not scaring you off. Mr. Forchelli : If that is major for his we will need the Long Island Expressway to take his out. Mr. Emilita: In relation to the traffic, year round traffic that those cottages generate now, we are talking about potention year round units from "x" number of seasonal cottages which generate no traffic in the wintertime, no traffic for nine months of the year. That is all I 'm saying. Mr. Forchelli : Well, the cottages are open from May until October, six months a year. So we don' t know if these will be all year round or summer. Mr. Emilita: I assume that ultimately they will be all year round youmay market them as summer units but sooner or later the prevailing experience on Long Island is that one time seasonal units eventually get lived in year round. Not by the present owners or first time owners but by their children or people they sell it to. That has been the experience all the way out the Island. Mr. Forchelli : So what you' r intructing us then is to do the traffic impact considering his project and. . . Mr. Emilita: Yes. Mr Forchelli: Okay, thank you. Mr Emilita: Okay, construction. I think for the moment, unless anyone else has anything that is all I have. Okay, let ' s skip Closure and Post Closure Plans , Approvals - required changes or variances to the zoning regulations that may or maynot be needed and other permit or funding requirements. Number one, required zoning approvals pertain to the Town' s regulations and let' s review them now so we can make sure that they are all addressed. WE need subdivision approval by the Planning Board, we will need at least a review by the Town trustees for any jurisdicition. I am not aware of the necessity for any variances on any of the proposed lots . I think you have 0 Scoping Session Page 12 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Emilita: a submission that does not anticipate any, in other words, everything conforms. Okay permits from Suffolk County, okay before we jump to the County, other muncipalities. Village of Greenport, you are intending to tie in to the water system. Mr. Forchelli : We are already in it. Mr. Emilita: That ' s right. Method of wastewater treatment will be Village or on site? Mr Forchelli : On site. Mr. Emilita: Okay, we can say that the Suffolk County Health Department will be needed for the method of sewer. At this time, I don' t see any other county agency being involved. State approvals - we will need approval from the State DOT for any improvements on the connection of Sage Boulevard and Route 25. Mr. Raynor: Dave, if I could interrupt you, you are going to have to go to the Suffolk CountyPlanning Commission. Mr. Emilita: That' s right, you ' re right, we are within 500 ' of the State Road, State Highway. Other State approvals will probably be from the StateDEC Tidal WEtlands Regulations, Freshwater Regulations , other State Agencies, I don' t believe and I don' t think there are any Federal Agencies involved. Now, we will jump into the major subject heading Environmental Setting. Under major topic Natural Resources, the firest one being Geology. Okay, here rather than repeat the datum of what is in the checklist under geology, you have a copy of this , I would say that under subsurface all of the items under subsurface "a" should be addressed, in otherwords , composition and thickness of subsurfacematerial with examples of, discussion under the examples of, depth to bedrock I don ' t think you ' ll have to worry about earthquake potential, we don' t have to worry about. Under Surface Conditions - we are talking here about the surface and what is immediately underneath it. Soil, soil characteristics , its physical and engineering properties , distribution of soil types or mapping and the suitability of the soil types for the uses proposed. In other words for supporting structures and roads . Mr. Forchelli: Now, in determinig soils, you have existing there a number of cottagesm, cesspools and so on, 31 cottages , and cesspools for 31 cottages and son on. We really don' t know what standards there were put in under like much of the Town and Long Island. So those, if we were to put in sanitry systems , the cesspools all have to be approved by the County Department of Health Services and they have to have certain tolerances two foot clearance from water to cesspool for perculation and so on so if our test hole 0 0 Scoping Session Page 13 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Forchelli: reveals that there is perculating material and our cesspools are going to be put in to county specs with regard to tolerances and so on, how much further than that do you want to go? You want us to make a comparison that it is better or worse than existing? That there is fewer in number or more than is existing there? Mr. Emilita: For purposes of the Draft, that will probably suffice to get the draft deemed sufficient for review, I can' t anticipate what other agencies or what the Baordmembers may request for additional information, but for the purposes of getting this declared sufficient for review, that should do it. Mr. Forchelli: On here, you have, we are talking about the environmental setting, right. We have item 2 an unusual land form of 1. 556 acres , and propsed use, we don' t have any proposed use for that that is just a give away to nature so for any use of that land, we don' t propose any use of that land. Mr. Emilita: Okay, that is all part of the whole information package that this proposal should present. This land is out there, there is no proposal to use it, we propose to dedicate to the Peconic Land Trust, or whatever you propose to do with it, it becomes a part of the total application package. Mr. Forchelli: You have mitigation measures could include a community type system or re-locate systems or connection with adjacent development. If our proposed system fully comply with the Suffok County Health Services, do you want us to go beyond that and talk about a communitysystem or, this is number 3 . Mr. Emilita: As a mitigation measure, let us say that we have a problemor you have a problem with IS-DS ' s individual sewage disposal systems, and what we are suggesting here is that and community super septic system may be a mitigation measure, but that in its context will be discussed under Roman Numeral. . . will be discussed later on in the impact statement, okay under Roman Numeral VI. Topography, we have a topo sheet here, okay major item B under Water Resources - 1. Ground water, this becomes , well the importance of it will be brought out. Ground water - we need to know the location and description of, well I don' t want to use the term recharge areas , but areas which will be used for drainage. We need to know the depth to ground water, seasonal variation, I think may be important in some of the areas near the saltwater. Quality, quantity, well we are not proposing to use ground, but we may have an impact on it. Okay, (b) the identification of present on site uses of ground water if any. Are there any wells on the site that are used now and if they are how are they proposed to be used for. Okay, area No. 2 Scoping Session Page 14 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Emilita: Surface Water - the location and description of surface water located on the project site or those that may be influenced by the project. Okay, we are talking about potential impacts on the surface water in the Bay. Surface water, again, seasonal variations , quality, and classifications which have been assigned by the NY State DEC, they are currently under review but . . . B - identification of uses of all surface waters, I believe the proposed use of any surface water will be open space. Description of any existing drainage areas, and patterns, and a discussion of a potential for flooding. , siltation, erosion and eutrophication of water sources . C - Air Resources - this is a subject which on the East, unless we are talking about a potential polluter to the air, we don ' t really need to address in a residential EIS. D- Terrestrial and aquatic ecology - 1. vegetation - since we are in an area that has a potential for the existance of rare, threatened or endangered species I think we need a fairly detailed inventory of the existance of vegetation types on the site . Mr. Forchelli: Once again, would that be in the DEIS for the marina project? Mr. Emilita: There was an inventory taken, yes . Mr. Forchelli : Was it satisfactory, would it give us a starting point? Mr. Emilita: Not totally satisfactory. I am not sure how applicable it would be for your site since what we were concentrating, or what the Board was concentrating here was shellfish and the fact that the principal site, the upland site was pretty disturbed by existing development that what was there was really not a truly indigineous species to the area back here you will find plant and animal life that is really native to the area. Again under this heading, I think the items that are contained in the outline under vegetation should be addressed. Under the fish and wildlife heading I think it more the wildlife species on the upland that should be addressed, there is little concern with this project on fish. Item 3 - wetlands - this will be a major concern. The existing wetlands should be discussed and described interms of what kind they are, the acreage, cover, how they may be classified and the benefits that derive from leaving them as is . Under Human Resources - Item A Transportation - basically concerned here about something we have already touched on, the increase of traffic on Sage Road iteself and on the intersection of Sage Road with Route 25 . The other items relating to public transportation I don' t think we need to address. Under Item B - Land Use and Zoning - we touched on this before, a description of the existing land use and zoning on the site and some descriptionof the existing land use on the site in terms of existing dwelling and open areas and what may be proposed to be done with the existing dwellings , whatever you propose to do with them. Again, description of existing zoning and if you feel it is relevant, proposed zoning, but at this point you are really operating under existing zoning. Scoping Session Page 15 6/6/86 Mr. Forchelli: May I ask a question? Do you want us to consider under here prior applications that were made on this property. Mr. Emilita: That I think you could discuss under history to bring us up-to-date on where you are now. Mr. Forchelli : So, in other words , I could put in there that las year there was a negative declaration on it. Mr. Emilita: Sure, whatever, you feel that. . . becuase this will be reviewed by more than the people sitting, the people in the Town who have some idea of what ' s happening here both physically and from a procedural point of view, someone sitting up in Stony Brook is not going to know that. Land Use Plans - again this may relate the proposed zoning or the land use plan itself. How is this development compatible with and if you feel that it does how it enhances the comprehensive plan. Under community services we are really still talking. . . . Mr. Forchelli : May I interrupt. Just going back to how this would enhance a comprehensive plan of the Town, it doesn' t enhance it. I doesn' t enhance the comprehensive plan of the town. Mr. Emilita: This is not the comprehensive plan, this is the proposed zoning, there is a difference. Mr. Forchelli : Isn' t the proposed zoning part of the Master Plan? Mr. Emilita: The proposed zoning ordinance is a major document of the land use plan. Mr. Forchelli : So the proposed zoning is the land use plan. The proposed zoning which I see behind me is for Marine Business , so then what shall we say that under the existing zoning it enhances the plan with proper density, but under the propsed zoning it doesn' t enhance the plan, because it can' t even be developed under the proposed zone. Mr. Emilita: That may well be the case, that the zone as shown could not environmentally ever be developed on this piece of property, that is very possible. Mr. Forchelli: Well, our plan here under the proposed zoning, from what I understand, we would not be able to put residential there. Mr. Emilita: Okay, without getting out the proposed zoning text I couldn' t answer that, I would have to look it up. Mr. Raynor: Is it cummulative, it might be? It is cummulative you can go down to a lower use if it is not, you can' t. Mr. Forchelli : Well, should we look into that? Mr. Emilita: Yes . Scoping Session Page 16 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Raynor: The existing one is . Mr. Emilita: I don ' t know without looking it up. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: I think it is. Mr. Emilita: Still under Community Services - here we are talking about the services that the Town/Village provide to the site. A brief description again with the idea of how the project will adversly or beneficially effect these services, in this section of the EIS we are simply looking for a description of them. Educational, police, fire, health care, social recreational and utlities . A brief discussion of demography might be in order and this may relate to the purpose and need for the project. In other words , will this project again the end result of this is why we need it. Will this project have any sort of impact one way or another on population characteristics to the Town . Initially we can probably assume no, but it depends on the marketing plan. Mr. Forchelli: On your EAF, increase of use for police, ambulance, fire protection. Is there any way to quantify that. Mr. Emiiita: The way I would recommend that this be properly be addressed would be to contact the municipal agency in charge of the service for Greenport Fire, Town Police and submit with the statement a letter from the head of the department stating his opinion as to wether or not this will cause a noticible increase of the service requirements or a significant increase in the service requirements on his department. But leave that judgement up to him because by doing that you will have an objective response. Mr. Forchelli; And the sanitary landfill, the added burden on the landfill . Mr. Emilita: Yes , in other words a letter from the police chief saying no problem puts that problem to bed. That is the best way to handle it. We can' t tell the police or fire chief can tell. Mr. Forchelli : The sanitary landfill , who do we get a hold of for that? Mr. EMilita: The Superintendent of Public Works. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: Ray Jacobs. Mr. Emilita: E. Cultural Resources -there are a couple of major topics there. The first one is visual. We need a description of the existing visual character of the , particularly of the part of the development or parts of the development that will be visible from off the site. Page 17 Mr. Emilita: The end result of this and identification of significant architectural designs that will be used and the types of construction that will be used. And, that should probably handle that. Item 2 - Historic and archaeological resources - we know there is some past history to this site, some description of its past use and any evidence of it and of its significance in an historical context to the community should be made. Mr. Forchelli: What is the past history? Mr. Emilita: Well, the site has been mined. I think that is why we see its configuration as it now exists . We need an identification of the potential archaeological value on the site. And, this will take contact and perhaps an on site survey by a impartial archeologist. Okay, Noise - we are not talking about a project that is expected to generate any unusual noise, so I don' t think any particular discussion of this topic is necessary. Next major subject heading - Significant Environmental Impacts - I won' t go over this topic by topic because it will be up to the description of the project and what it is expected to impact. This will be revealed in the draft and it will develop over the analysis of the draft. The next major heading - Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmental Impact - what this section will look at will be the ways to modify the project in a manner that significant impacts will be reduced to a non-significant level. Mr. Forchelli : Do you want us to consider, I guess we are required to consider the no action alternative which would be to leave the 31 cottages and leave it the way it is. Mr. Emilita: Okay, we do have a couple of headings down we will discuss the whole topic of alternatives. Let us skip over this whole thing. Okay, the next major heading is Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot be Avoided if the Project is Implemented - at this point unless anyone can identify or wants to see some particular or can anticipate some particular unavoidable adverse effect we will let that come out of the draft. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: I would like to add something in here and it has to do with alternatives . Mr. Emilita: That would be the next topic. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: But, it also has to do with what we are talking about right now, the adverse impact on the environment. Have you thought of leaving these areas vacant and putting more down in this area. Mr. Forchelli: We tried that. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: I know you have. Have you tried that as an alternative, I think you should use that again. Do you follow Scoping Session Page 18 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Stoutenbourgh: what I 'm saying. So that this area here possibly canbe thought again maybe thinking of this as an alternative. This is the key area that you want for your houses and if we could significantly save all of this, you' d be having less detrimental effect as far as the environment goes as far as the wildlife, the plantings and the wetlands and what have you, you would actually be gaining here. If you can convince the Board of this , which you tried, I know, but that should be one of your alternatives. That is all I 'm saying. Basically you are going to have difficulty as these people here are putting in these wet areas the houses and what have you. It would help everybody if you could. Mr. Mohring: This is a monumental task and you are throwing so many roadblocks that you might as well forget the map. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: What I said? Mr. Mohring: No, what he said. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: No, no. . . Mr. Mohring: It would take a long time to do all that he is talking about and maybe never get finished and the cost would prohibitive, might as well junk it, or wait until the marine stuff comes along there and take a tax loss. What you said is good, that is our first plan but that got washed out and for some reason and for some reason it is the best plan and it was a plan that we could live with, but this kind of stuff is hogwash. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: Well, it might be hogwash but it is necessary none-the-less, it ' spart of the review that they go through and what I 'm trying to say. Mr. Mohring: Well, if you are on the other side of the how can you possibly do all this stuff. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: I say then that you should have thought about that before you bought the property but that is neither here nor there. The point I 'm just trying to make is there might be an alternative here , let' s just think about it and use it as an alternative. Mr. Mohring It is the only alternative we have. Mr. Stoutenbourg: No, no you have other alternatives . Mr. Forchelli : Let me say this. Diane, are we on the record or off the record? Mr. Emilita: Everything that is said here is part of this discussion. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: We are still on the record. Scoping Session Page 19 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Forchelli: I look at this and I say to myself this road here, going through wetlands , I have to worry about him, I don' t want to worry about him. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: He is asking you to confur with him so that the both of you create this road. That is what he is asking you to do, not you do your thing and he do his . Mr. Forchelli: I think we are forgetting that there are existing uses to the land so probably everything I have heard here today, and I look at the sheet here and I see increase in need for police, ambulance, and fire and I wonder if everyother subdivision is required to look into that. Mr.. Stoutenbourgh: Absolutely. Mr. Emilita: Every development that is subject to a SEQRA review has to be reviewed, every item. We are learing more and more as SEQRA is implemented and not implemented how to implement it and it is best to err on the side of strict compliance. Mr. Forchelli : So in other words what you are saying Mr. SToutenbourgh, is this is. . . Mr. Stoutenbourgh: I 'm saying keep everthing down in here and keep everything out of here. Mr. Forchelli: Leave this all open here. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: That would be an alternative. It would be one way of having less environmental impact that is what I 'm saying. If you do your impact down here you don ' t do this you don' t do this, you don ' t do this, that kind of thing. You dedicate this as a natural area. Mr. Forchelli : What I have trouble in my own mind is , if we are trying to protect the environment here, leave this open and don' t do anything here I 'm getting a mixed message because I look behind at the Master Plan and see this marine business which is a much more intense and environmentally damaging use than four houses and I 'm getting a mixed message as to here I 'm being asked to dot every i and cross every t and identify species of birds , and animals and flora and fuana and talk about the Town Lanfill and then I see behind me on the wall the proposed Master Plan a marine business for this property and to tell you the truth I am totally befuddled. I don' t know what to think. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: What you have to remember is that this is a proposed plan, which has not been adopted. Mr. Mohring: Are you saying that that will never happen? Mr. Stoutenbourgh: No, I 'm saying that you. . . Scoping Session Page 20 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Mohring; Well, if a lot of money has been spent on it it must be imminent. Mr. Raynor: On the first proposal for this property, under the cluster, the Board negative decd it. If we were to revert to the concept again where does that let this project stand in other words is it within the Board' s domain at this juncture, were we to go back to plan A and try to come up with a suitable plan for the ZBA to leave the initial negative determination or now that the Board with plan B has come in a declared positive action and to purue this would have to go through that. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: In other words your asking if this would hold this thing up, to such an extent. Mr. Raynor: Well , I 'm trying to get an idea of whether we have that option to proceed in either direction. Mr. Emilita: Let me see if I understand what you are saying. You are saying either one or two things , either withdraw this and resubmit that or submit that as an alternative to this . Mr. Raynor: My question is what happens to the standing of the initial determination on the cluster. I think the Board went and say okay we declared a negative determination on the cluster proposal down here and we ran a fowl to ZBA with some of their restrictions and they said we are going to reject it on that basis . I 'm getting vibes from Paul that we should at least consider this again. Mr. Forchelli : Henry, I think I understand. In other words if we went and said alright, this is our imaginary line we don' t want to touch this any more than you or the Town would want us to but we have to get a certain yield to get out of here and so we had a negative dec on the plan which was just up here these units . If we came back with that plan and said and just added this as all non-touchable space and this came in with effectively that plan same road, same everything are we entitled to, can we rely on the old negative dec? Mr. Emilita: Well, we can' t scuttle this procedure. Mr. Forchelli : If we withdraw this application and come back with a new application? Mr. Emilita; You have to start all over again. Mr. Raynor: I wouldn' t do that. Mr. Emilita: I wouldn' t do that. I would say inthis procedure looking at the total site if that is the best plan, that firg€'= 0 Scoping Session Page 21 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Emilita: one, that will stand out as the first one and that is the way that the property will be developed. Mr Stoutenbourgh: That is what I 'm hopping that they would overview this thing and say well the first plan actually, we have to let the man use his property and possibly the first plan might be even better. Mr. Forchelli: Under my understanding under the Town law is that, of course, this would have to be interperted by the Town Attorney, that the Town Board in approving the cluster can authorize the Planning Board to give the necessary variances. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: I 'm not sure. . . the Town Board can not overrule the ZBA. Mr. Forchelli: No, but they can by special resolution under 7728 can make alteration to the zoning. Mr. Emilita: You mean 281 cluster? Mr. Forchelli: 7728? No. 7728 is the village, yes 281. Mr. Emilita: Okay, tht is what this whole project would be implemented under. The Planning Board now has that power what common practise is for the Planning Board to review an application in its sketch plan form with the Town Board confirming that the cluster concept is appropriate for the site. Mr. Forchelli : Right now they say you can cluster down from two acre zoning. In order to make this work we will have to cluster down substantially more. Mr. Emilita: Okay, I think that is implicit with in the, myself, I think that is implicit within the Town Board' s affirmation of the cluster concept, but again, we would need an interpretation from the Town Attorney. In other words why is the one acre minimum, and can it go below one acre. Mr. Raynor: I think that should be explored because if we are going to leave that as a viable alternative, a better alternative, then I think we should get an interpretation from the Town Attorney. If the implicationfrom the Town Board of approving the cluster allows the Planning Board lattitude to do this. Mr. Mohring: I still don' t know the answer. We still don ' t know the answer to the question you asked. Which is going to sufice the positive or negative if we go back to the other plan. Mr. Raynor: Yes , that is what I asked. If I understand Dave correctly, you can' t go back to what we had originally. Mr. Emilita: My response to that was that you can' t scuttle Scoping Session Page 22 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Emilita: this procedure. We are in it now. If that is the best plan , it will show as the best plan. Mr. Raynor: It may in essence modify what is being submitted to you. Mr. Mohring: We are trying to shorten the time. You've held this thing long enough. Mr. Emilta: I understand you concern. But the true facts are the Board' s concern that this plan in context with its other work and it hasn' t been delayed, it hasn' t been held up. It ' s been processed as expediently as it could be. The fact that you ran a foul with the Zoning Board on a prior application probably explains better than anything why we are where we are. Mr. Mohring: At this point we are willing to sell it back to the Town, give us our money back. There is no money in this any more . Why don' t you buy it back as a park if everybody is so interested in it. Maybe we could donate it and keep it as a park. Mr. Emilita: Can we proceed on this now,we are seeing the light at the end of the tunnel. Mr. Raynor: Dave, can we get a determination from the Town ATtorney, because I think it is a very viable piece of information and it' s relative to making an alternative decision. Mr. Emilita: Sure. I would say, Henry, you as agent or whoever make a written request. Mr. Raynor: Because if we can proceed as a TypeI , which you are indicating to us , that would preclude the various information that is necessary for the bulk of the property. We can substantially address the environmental concerns in a greatly shortened form. Mr. Emilita: I 'm not sure that would be the case. Where are you getting all your yield from. Mr. Mohring: From the high ground. Mr. Emilita: Yes , but where are you getting the density from. Mr. Raynor: Alright, I see what you are saying. Mr. Mohring: Yes , but we are not disturbing it. Mr. Emilita: I know you are not, but if you can' t disturb it any way then where are you getting the density from. Are you picking it out of the air and saying 20 units. Scoping Session Page 23 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Forchelli: They are all there now. Mr. Emilita: No, no you only have five units there , five year round units. Mr. Forchelli: This brings me to something that I have to - we have identified wetland here, then we calculated in accordance with the Town Ordinance and we came up with a yield for 23 even though there are 31 existing cottages . Now we came up with a yield for 23 and said okay, we' ll go with that yield. Then, along the course of the way I was told by Henry who was told by you that you wanted a yield map. I called you and said why do you want a yield map becuase it isn' t in the zoning ordiance for it, didn' t we calculate it right? And you said philosophically I want to see that you are not getting more than on a convential subdivision and I said that there is nothing in the ordinance requiring me to give a yield map and I said what if I don' t and you said if I don' t you are going to get a positive declaration on this . Then, hoping not to get a positive delcation we supplied you with a yield map. So what you are saying now is that the 23 lots that we say we have, if we go through this process what we might do is disqualify all of them and then we will be down to maybe fewer lots . Mr. Emilita: I am not saying that. Mr. Forchelli : But, that is where we are headed. Mr. Emilita: No that is not what we are saying at all. Mr. Forchelli: I just don' t understand how the Town can we can go through a process here, and you are saying that you are going to positive dec and you are going to look at all of this to determine our yield and yet you are telling me that the Town will negative dec the whole thing and put this into marine business. I don' t understand this . Mr. Emilita: You are mixing apples and oranges. We are not talking about the same thing, or the same level of investigation. We are not talking about the same actions . Mr. forchelli : You are talking about putting something into a highly environmental sensative area, you are talking about putting something into Marine Business and at the same time you are telling us that maybe we are not even going to be able to count that land for our yield. And the I am also being told, well put everything up here and leave this open. I don' t know why I should leave this open, should I leave this open so the Master Plan can be implemented here. I don ' t understand. I am at a total loss . Scoping Session Page 24 6/6/86 Breezey Shores Mr. Emilita: Okay, you asked a number of questions. Let us get back to the beginning. There is a CO on the property for 5 year round dwellings and 3 cottages . We are talking about an established legal yield of 5 lots. , right now trying to get up some number that the site can sustain. The fact that you have any number of seasonal cottages is not relevant to the zoning. Mr. Forchelli : We don' t know if they are seasonal or not. Mr. Emilita: Well, that is what the CO says and that is all. I can go by. So what we are trying to do, or what you are trying to do is increase that number up to whatever and I 'm trying to look at the land with its physical constraints and trying to adjust this . That is all I 'm trying to do and we use the concept of the yield map as a mechanism to do that. How many conforming lots can you get on here. Okay, you come up with that number but physically we don' t want them here, physically we want them out there. That is the procedure we are using. I 'm not trying to use this as a cannon. I 'm trying to use this as an impartial, unquestionable procedure by all parties who look at this as to the way to do it and this is not pertenant only to this application nor to the Town of Southold, nor to NY State, this is a standard way to do it. Even though the zoning code does not specifically say, yield map conventional yield map that is the procedure how you do it. And that is why. Mr. Stoutenbourgh: Perhaps I shouldn' t even have brought this up. But, I thought it would be an alternative for you and a way out, I still think it is an alternative. You've already suggested that you speak to Tasker. Mr. Forchelli: There is no sense exploring something. Mr. Stoutehbourgh: Well , you have to have an alternative. Mr. Forchelli: Here is exactly what I gather, that you are looking to disqualify all this area we are not even going to count it for yield, what is the point. Mr. Emilita: No one said that. Mr. Forchelli : I hear where you are coming from. Mr Emilita: I hear what you are saying and I 'm not thinking that it is not my intention and I 'm only out to do justice to the land that is it, for your rights and the rights of the birds and frogs that are out there. Whatever else this property can sustain with a significant environmental impact that is what we have to work toward. To get you through the process . Mr. Forchelli: Anything elsC? • Scoping Session Breezey Shores Page 25 6/6/86 Mr. Emilita: Okay, we are under the section under alternatives and we have pretty well gotten into it. We have 5 , 6 , 7 major topics here. NO. 1 - Alternative Design and we have batted that around pretty good, tried looking at three major field options and again I would suggest that you use this standard for here for the outline as a guidance, with out getting into all the line items. B - Alternative Sites- This is an item that needs to be addressed in that we have some legal precedent to address it and what we only expect you to do in identify sites that may be presently owned and similarly zoned as this site in the vicinity that may be utilized in a similar manner. Mr. Forchelli : We don' t the power of condemnation. Mr. Emilita: I realize that, I said presently owned. Item C - Alternative size - anyone of these alternative designs there may be fine tuning of the number of units involved to mitigate adverse impacts. Alternative D - Construction and Operation Scheduling - Actually construction scheduling different ways of scheduling the construction activities to mitigate environmental impact and this item is really gauged at major large scale construction project, here we about some 23 lots , address itas you see fit. Alternative Land Uses - under present zoning assuming alternative uses are few in nature. And then there is the no action alternative, not changing the uses on the site. Next major topic - Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources - that generally deals with the construction material. The next item - Growh Inducing Aspects - in terms of population and support facilities meaning businesses and services and the development potential of adjacent sites needs to be addressed. Here I think we are talking principally about the other developments which will depend on the joint improvement of Sage Boulevard. Final subject topic - the Effects on the Use and Conservation Energy Resources - here we are looking at what types of energy conservation measures will be incorporated on the project. And, finally as appendices, any background which you may have produced for the report, inventories of the wetlands, and what have you, copies of your expert consultants reports. That is, I think, all I have. Time frame is up to you, the next step would be when you submit the Draft and whether the document, the draft document is sufficient to review in the context of SEQRA, in other words , send it out to all the agencies for review and comment. Being no further discussion , the scoping session was adjourned at 12 : 50 p.m. R�esppecttXfu'lyll�ly suub[mitnt�eld, Diane M Schultze, I e e-tay� Southold Town Planning Board 0 P ^U'AID ��V .•, t T .moi S LD Sf L y Y Ol y,`o Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Dated May 19, 1986 Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations , and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action described below is a Type I action and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Proposal of Breezey Shores is for a cluster subdivision of 83 . 118 acres into 23 building lots with the existing 31 strutures to be removed. This proposal is located at Sage Boulevard, Greenport. Further information may be obtained by contacting Diane M. Schultze, Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York, 11971. Copies to: Robert Flack, DEC Commissioner NYS, DEC at Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor Henry E. Raynor, Jr. Agent PLAI'NI G` OARD TO. SOU H LD SUF 4&r°w r 'J" TY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 6, 1986 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattituck,NY 11952 Re: Breezy Shores Dear Mr. Raynor: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, May 5 , 1986 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself lead agency under the State Environmental Quality Review Act for the subdivision to be known as "Breezy Shores" located at Sage Blvd. , Greenport for 23 lots on 83 acres . If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours ,l - BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Jeffrey Forchelli PLANNING-BOARD j1_ TOWN O SOU H¢LD SU ,F UNTY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 4 , 1986 Mr . Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re : Breezey Shores Dear Mr. Raynor: Please let this confirm the request at the Monday, Ma=ch 3 , 1986 Planning Board meeting regarding the above mentioned subdivision proposal. It was requested that conventional layout be submitted for the proposed subdivision. The certificates of occupancy, as previously requested, have been submitted to the file. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very trulyp yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. , CHAT MAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc : Jeffrey Forchelli DV 1219 *NG" ajg# . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRO;IMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART I Project Information NOTICE: This document is desimed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to comolete PARTS 2 and 3. It is ezpecteo that completion of the EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring sucp additional cork is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. AMENDMENT OF 9/17/84 EAF FOR SAGE ESTATES NAPE OF PROJECT: NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different Charlotte Sage and Bayview Bayview Development Corp . Realty Development Corp. BreezL Shores (formerly Sage (Name) states) (No #) Sage Boulevard ADDRESS AND N/UtE OF APPLICANT: (Street) Bayview Development Corp. Greenport, NY 11944 c/o Jeffrey D. Forchelli, Esq. TP17state - ant P. O . BOX 31 gUSt NCSs PHONE: p 120 Mineola Boulevard — LreeL Mineola, NY 11$01 1 tau 1p DESCRIPT104 OF PROJECT: (Briefly describe type of projector action) Applicant seeks to subdivide the subject premises into 23 building lots with 23 separate boat slips and remove all 37 existing structures and docks . (PLEASE CDMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if not applicable) A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Phvsical setting of overall project, both deveioned and undevelooed areas) 1. General character of the land: Generally uniform slope X Generally uneven and rolling or irregular 2. Present land use: Urban Industrial Commercial Suburban Rura) forest Agriculture _, Other 31 existing subs dard resTdentl Cottages 3. Total acreage of oroject area: 83.118 acres including 11 .551 underwater Aoprozimate acreage: Presentiv After Completion Presently After Completion Meadow or Brushiand 2 1_7acres 2 8 . 7acres Nater Surface Area 4 acres 4 ac-^s Forested 27 acres 10 _acres Unvegetated (rock, earth or fill) 0 acres 0 acres Agricultural 0 acres 0 acres -- Roads, buildings Hetland (Freshwater or and other paved Tidal as her Articles surfaces 6 acres 16 acres 24, Z5 or F.C.L.) 12_8acres 12• Cres Unde water--- 117 thew n i ate ty'+e) acres acres \ Made Wand 1+8�fg, HavP� 3 m 20%,—r"( vertu / 4. 'mat is �redcminant soil type(s) on nroject site? head Sand loam 1tS%, CanadlCe S11t e/ 1 10%S. e. Cre tnera y 7 drotk out[rooing5 on ern j«ct si V? _Yes X 90 Oam a, CU I� t . "hat is deoth to bedrock? N/A ('n Beet) _1 _ 6. Approximate Dercentaoe of proposed or�JeCt site with slopes: 0-107 100%: greater _q, In-i5Z ; 157 or 7. Is project contiguoub�to, or contain a buildinn or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? _Yes X No S. What is the depth to the water table?5-13 feet generally 8 feet 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? X Yes _No 10. Does project site contaity any species of plant or animal life that is identified 4s threatened op , en dance red - Yes n ;10, according to - Identify each species No speClea a _aing to Threatened or Endangered Species Lists prepared ander / hnaan ra pecies 1ct (lea ) and NYS Environmental Conser. Law Section 11 -0 ' state 11. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the roject sitq? (i.e c'.iffs, dun s, iher eological formations - X Yes _No. (Describe 1 . 6� acre island to be c�ea�'iea ea ) 12. Is the projer. sit r na$ura_ p p p_presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - _Yes No. 13. Does the pr12ent site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? Yes No 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary wetland pond tributary to Southold Bay 15. Lakes, Ponds, Hetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Na'rc Hashamomuck Pond ; b. size (in acres) 172 acres approx. within z mile 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. Land single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). Zoning— 2 acre residente.l use-- Single-family residential on average lot size of 10 , 000 sq . ft. and B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION commercial (marina) use I. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 83. 118 acres. b. Project acreage developed: 39 acres initially; 39 acres ti tel of which approx. 16 acres wil� �°e >Xbads , buildings and paved c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 44 ae..(including 11 .551 underwater) areas d. Length of project, in miles: 0. 85m• (if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: age N A ; developed acreage building square foot- f. Number of off-stunt parking spaces existino 60 proposed -46 9. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour0 _(upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial _ 23 Ultimate 23 I. If: Orientation :'eighborhood-City-Recional Estimated Emoloyment Commercial N/A Industrial N/A j. Total height of tallest nronosed structure 25-30 feet. -2- 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc. ) will be removed from the site - 0 tons Cubic yards. 3. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed frog site . acres. a. Will any mature forest (over 1^0 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this Project, Yes X No 5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? X Yes _%0 6. If sincle phase project: Anticipated period of construction 18 months, (includina demolition), 1. :t Tu1•i-^baled project: a. Total number of phases anticioa ted N/A No. b, Anticipated date of con. ncement phase 1 month Year (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date final phase month _year, d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseouent phases? _Yes No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? _Yes X No 9. Nimoer of jobs generated: during construction 10 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? X Yes No. If yes, explain: .in3ividual Relocation of internal subdivision road and exisuing,�wazer services 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? X Yes _Yo: b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial , etc.) sewage into individual on—Site S?'ISYSL,rZ�i�'S c7IC�L'E'S"�p'o�1 S c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Will surface area of existing lakes ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? —Ye z x No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? X Yes No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? X Yes _No In. If yes, will an existing solid waste disnosal facility be used? X Yes vo C. If yes, give name: private sanitato location Town of Southold landfill cars — d.. hill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? _Yes X No 16. Will orniect use herbicides or pesticides? Yes X No 17. Will project routinely produce odors (mom than one hour Der day)? _Yes X No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? _Yes X No 19. will project result in an increase in energy use? _Yez X No. If yes, indicate types) 20. If water supply is from wells indicate oumoing capacity N/A gals/minute. 21. Total anticinated water usage per day _8,0420 gals/day. 22. Zonino: a. What is dominant zoning classification of site? Residential A b. Current specific zoning classification of site 2—acre residential _. Is or000sen use consistent with Present zoninq? YES d. If no, indicate desired ioninq E'XiS1171 cotta are nonconforming and app leant see s to re uce nonco Ag -3- 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal Permit ouired' Yes X No b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? Yes -x No c. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes, No) (Type) (Date) (Date) Town Trustees Yes Storm repair 10/16/85 10/21/85 4-�, Town, e_. Board l• �/ 5 --.r-�-.. Yes Caster �0/ 05/8 2 g 8 See � : .own, "* Planning Board asuos arvision 10 = } 477d5-Prelim. Below City, To.m, Zoning Board tv City, County Health Department Yesw T:e a at. "enalns Other local agencies Yes a w2r S b. YencS nom_ Other regional aaencies IG State Agencies NYSDEC YesePT -rams Lyng Federal Agencies -jG6 C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the sat, pl se cu such cts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid them. '6 m PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: Jean A Celender, Envir. Planner TITLE: President, JAC Planning Corp. REPRESENTING: Bayview Development Corp. DATE: November 6, 1985 See attachment for additional information concerning project Note: Approvals heretofore given may need reapproval for amended map. -4- JAC PLANNING CORP. ATTACHMENT TO EAF BREEZY SHORES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) is submitted to amend the previous application by Bay-view Development Corp . to subdivide 83. 118 acres in the Town of Southold as designated on Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000, Section 053, Block 5, Lot 1 . The previous application for a major subdivision, entitled "Sage Property, Section 1 ," was determined not to have a significant effect on the environment (Negative Declaration) and was granted*approval by the Southold Planning Board on March 4, 1985. The applicant proposes the following modifications to the subdivision sketch plan of January 21 , 1985 on a new sketch plan entitled "Breezy Shores , " dated October 23, 1985: 1 . Project is now single-phased and plans are submitted for the entire site . Previously on Sage Property the plans called for a total of 31 lots in two sections ; 19 in Section 1 and 12 in a future section (not detailed on the map) . The proposed plan for Breezy Shores is for a total of 23 cluster lots in conform- ance with the 2-acre zoning and available yield for the site . In addition, existing residential cottages , non-conforming under tke Code, will be removed as well as the docks on the east side of the lagoon. These docks will be replaced by a floating dock on the west side of the lagoon with 18 slips, a ramp and fixed platform to be utilized by residents in the eastern portion of the property. For the five homes proposed in the western portion of the site near Main Road, a smaller dock with 5 slips will be constructed for their use . A total of 32. 61 acres of open space will be preserved (61% of the upland area) which contains 16. 8 acres of pond and wetlands . 2. No variances are required from the Zoning Board of Appeals . Previously, the Sage Property Sketch Plan required setback variances and lot area variances. 3 . Sage Road is relocated north on the eastern end of the site to allow for the design of cluster lots in conformance with Town cluster provisions and Suffolk County Health Dept, standards . The minimum lot size proposed on Breezy Shores is 42, 000 sq. ft. The previous Sage Property had lots with an average size of 12, 000 sq. ft. The proposed plan seeks to eliminate the existing nonconformity of the 31 residential cottages , which are built on lot sizes of approximately 10 ,000 sq. ft. or less . * - sketch plan -5- JAC PLANNING CORP. ATTACHMENT TO EAF (CONT-D. ) The water main presently runs along the existing Sage Road and is part of the distribution system of the Greenport Water District. New ccnnections to the main will be provided for each of the new residences and an easement will be granted to the Greenport Water District to enable continued servicing of the main for the fourteen lots which it transects . In accordance with Chapter 44 of the Code of Southold, the applicant sets forth the following reasons why the proposed amended action will not have a significant effect on the environ- ment and should be issued a Negative Declaration by the Lead Agency: 1 . The proposed "Breezy Shores " represents an improvement in design and environmental parameters than the approved Sage Property Sketch Plan, which was determined not to have a significant effect on the environment. Likewise , the amended plan should also be granted a Negative Declaration. le-A 2 . Public water by the Greenport Water District is available on-site via an existing water main along Sage Road. New connections will be provided to the water main for each of the new residences . Sufficient supply of potable water is available to service this development, which is projected to have an average f water use of 8, 050 gallons per day. The� water l ( requirements of the proposed project are less than if Sthe 31 existing cottages were occupied (certificate of occupancies granted) or construction of the proposed Sage Property for 31 homes. Both of these alternatives would result in additional water usage ; estimated at an average of 10 , 850 gallons per day. 3. The test hole data indicate that soils on-site are i{�' ��"' capable of supp6rt3rig sizi surface septic tanks and cesspools for each residence. The lot sizes are in conformance with County Health Department standards for development with individual on-site subsurface systems . The systems can be designed on each lot to meet required separation distances mandated by the town and county. Furthermore , the proposed action will eliminate the present old subsurface systems that service the existing cottages which are proposed to be removed. The project site is located outside of the deep recharge area or Hydrogeologic Zone III as defined in the 208 study. The site is located in Hydrogeologic Zone IV. A significant portion of precipitation which is recharged to groundwater is eventually lost as underflow to Southold Bay and does not contribute to a prime recharge area. -6- 0 JAC PLANNING CORP. ATTACHMENT TO EAF (CONT°D. ) The project's proposed low density below 1 unit per acre (0 . 5) is expected to result in nitrate-nitro- gen concentration in the groundwater well below the drinking water standard of 10 .0 milligrams per liter. `Nater quality protection will be afforded by the low density of development and preservation of open space recharge areas . With the sandy soils present on the site , it is expected that minimal lawn areas will be developed and therefore a low application of fertilizers is anticipated. In conclusion, public water supply to the residences will ensure a safe and reliable water supply system, without posing adverse environmental consequences to groundwater resources or to the service of the Greenport Water District. On-site subsurface systems will not threaten the quality of water supplies since nitrate-nitrogen concentration in groundwater will continue to be well below drinking water standards with implementation of the project. Furthermore , the proposed revised plan represents a reduction in homesites from the existing 31 cottages and 31 proposed building lots on the Sage Property Sketch Plan. The reduction of 8 homes (and approximately 20 people) and replacement of old outdated subsurface systems with modern sanitary systems will result in a decrease of expected nitrate-nitrogen concentration in groundwater and an overall benefit to the environment, 4. The existing Sage Road does not have any drainage facilities for containment and recharge of stormwater runoff. The proposed plan will provide for installation of roadway drainage facilities to contain 100% of the stormwater runoff on-site . This represents a beneficial impact to street drainage and eliminates the potential for ponding, erosion, etc . with the development of the proposed amended plan. 5. The existing bulkhead in the eastern portion of the site along Southold Bay was severly damaged by Hurricane Gloria (September 27, 1985) = The bulkhead will be restored with similiar materials to original condition under an approved Town Trustees permit (see attached Fe m t) . -7- �j`��I'`_sc_'-��Lm't`=_�'�`�"f��•��y�r�+''�-t`Sl"y.�..rt,` 'R. ��r y rS. .. - r -. _ zw w_O �� -ar+. ..cL, �v�- - -• V _ az. �� _ �a - ,Y"- _ _ S z.-�� =`�'.1F.�s1'0"m<'(-aEv .\ Sir- oll N LL. _ W p Ln Lu H ILL © J z p ia. 76 LU Lu ca LU o O wo Asa r_ y� ) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD t o v�q 1z 1985 ENYIRO;IMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART I Project Information NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these Questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide anv additional information you believe will be needed to complete PARTS 2 and 3. It is expected that comoletion of the EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring sucp additional work is unava liable, so indicate and specify each instance. AMENDMENT OF 9/17/84 EAF FOR SAGE ESTATES NAME OF PROJECT: NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different) Charlotte Sage and Bayview Bayview Development Corp. Realty Development Corp. Breezy Shores (formerly Sage ame Estates) (No #) Sage Boulevard ADDRESS AND NAME OF APPLICANT: (Street Bayview Development Corp . Greenport, NY 11944 c/o Jeffrey D. Forchelli, Esq. TFW--� state - ame F. O . BOX 31 120 Mineola Boulevard BUSINESS PHONE: p — treet Mineola, NY 11501 7—u7 tate (Lip) DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT- (Briefly describe type of project or action) Applicant seeks to subdivide the subject premises into 23 building lots with 23 separate boat slips and remove all 37 existing structures and docks . (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if not applicable) A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas) I. General character of the land: Generally uniform slope X Generally uneven and rolling or irregular 2. Present land use: Urban Industrial Commercial SuDurDan Ru ra) Fn rest Agriculture gther 31 existing subs�and and redden tiarCot tages .3. Total acreage of project area: 83.118 acres including 11 .551 underwater Aoproxima to acreage: Presentiv After Completion Presently After Completion Meadow or Brushland 21 -7acres 2 8 •7acres Hater Surface Area 4acres 4 acs^s Forested 27 acres 10 _acres Unvegetated (rock, Agricultural 0 acres 0 acres earth or fill) 0 acres 0 acres Roads, buildings Netland (Freshwater or and Other ;laved Tidal As ner ArticlesQ surfaces 6 acres 16 acres ?a, 2c o- F-C.L. ) 12. 8acres 12•`fcres Underwater--- 1 v 11 7 Made lOand ( " t ate type) cres acres 8�, Hav 3a�-m 20%,-7tver- C- '+hat is ^,edWinant soil tvpe(s) on project site? head sand loam 1 , canadice silt oam 121o, cut I fiij-lo% 5. a. Ore there bedrock out[ropoinns or, ^rniett sit?? — Yes X 90 t . What is de0thh to bedrock? N/A (In meet) �_ A 6. Approximate percentaoe of proposed 1110ect site with slopes: 0-1OS 100%: In-1. 15: or greater 1. —t. 7. Is project contiguou@�to, or contain a buildinn or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? _Yes X No S. What is the depth to the water table?5-13 feet generally 8 feet 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? X Yes _No 10. Does Project site contai�any species of plant or animal life that is identified 4s threatened oCC endangered - Yes _io, according to - Identify each species No specie c�'lZ�drQlrig t0 Threatened or Endangered Species Lists prepared under i�T3—hnclaneerPT�Decie Act (Fed) and NYS red Law Section 11-0535 (state) 11 Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the groject site? (i.e cl iffy, dunCs aLher 9eol�gtcal formations - -y_Yes _No. (Describe 1 . 6b acre Island to De U i a-ceQ 12. Is the project sit r natura P P ) P J P_presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area Yes XX No. 13. Does the prevent site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? Yes X No 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of stream and name of river to which ;t is tributary wetland pond tributary to Southold Bay 15. Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Hashamomuek Pond ; b. Size (in acres) 172 acres approx. within 2 mile 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. Land single family residential. R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). Zoning-- 2 acre residential use-- Single-family residential on average lot size of 10 , 000 sq. ft. and B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION commercial (marina) use 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 83. 118 acres. b. Project acreage developed: 39 acres initially; 39 acresti tet of which approx. 16 acres wil`� tae >Xoads , buildings and paved c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 44 ac ..(including 11 .551 underwater) areas d. Length of project, in miles: 0 . 85m. (if appropriate) e. If pro.1'ec ;s an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot- age N/A ; developed acreage f. Number of off-strr.t parking spaces existino 60 ; proposed 46 g. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour 30 (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial - 3 Ultimate 23 I. If: Orientation eighborhood-City-Regional Estimated Employment Commercial N/A Industrial N/A j. Total height of tallest nronosed structure 25-30 feet. _2- 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc. ) will be removed from the site - 0 tons cubic yards. 3. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed fro, site - acres. t. Will any mature forest_(over 1^D years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project.' Yes 1i No 5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? X Yes No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 18 months, (including demolition). 't Tulti_..r,a<ed oro jest: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A No. b. Anticipated date of commencement phase i month y ear (including demolition) C. Approximate completion date final phase month _year. d. Is phase I financially dependent on subseouent phases? _Yes No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? _Yes X No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? X Yes No. If yes, explain: Relocation of internal subdivision road and exiisMn2V9AW er services 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? X Yes _4p: b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial , etc.) sewa e into individual on-site s SL'—'-Gc'III1L'S c iu CEMS 7O is c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged N/A 13. Will surface area of existing lakes ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by pr000sa l7 Yes x No. la. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? X Yes No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? X Yes _No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disnosal facility be used? X Yes 40 C. If yes, give name: private Sanitat, location Town of Southold landfill cart�r� — d. '.till any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? _Yes X No 16. Will Droject use herbicides or pesticides? _Yes X 40 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more.than one hour Der day)? _Yes X No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? _Yes X No 19, will project result in an increase in energy use? —Yes X 40. If yes, indicate types) 20. If water suooly is from wells indicate pumping capacity N/A gals/minute. 21. Total anticinated water usage per day _$_r_25gals/day. 22. Zoning: a. What is dominant zoning classification of site? Residential A b. Current specific zoning classification of site 2—acre residential C. Is proposed use consistent .ith nresent zoning? YES d. If no, indicate desired zoning Existing cottages are nonconforming and applicant seeks to reduce noncom ormity -3- L 26. Approvals: a. Is ary Federal perm 0"ouired? _Yes X No • b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? Yes X No C. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes, No) (Type) (Date) (Date) Town Trustees Yes Storm repair 10/16/85 10/21/85 See �'' Town, �•g`-aaa'dBoard Yes Cluster 10 0 84_.2 OZ/85 , Town, Planning Board Yes uS-bTivision 10 1 4 8 5-Prelim. Below City, Town, Zoning Board -'IIi6— City, County Health Department les Sewage Wat. e'en ing_ Other local agencies Y9,6- YYU r en ing_ Other regionalagencies No State Agencies ?YSDEC Yds W-ee l"aan= Peeing Federal Agencies _'11_6 C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with th�Celen plea Se cu such Acts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid them. L/CJJ PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: Jean Ader, Ehv1r. Planner TITLE: President, JAC Planning Corp. REPRESENTING: Bayview Development Corp. DATE: November 6, 1985 See attachment for additional information concerning project Note: Approvals heretofore given may need reapproval for amended map. -4- JAC PLANNING CORP. • ATTACHMENT TO EAF BREEZY SHORES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) is submitted to amend the previous application by Bayview Development Corp. to subdivide 83 . 118 acres in the Town of Southold as designated on Suffolk County Tax Map as District 1000 , Section 053, Block 5, Lot 1 . The previous application for a major subdivision, entitled "Sage Property, Section 1 ," was determined not to have a significant effect on the environment (Negative Declaration) and was granted*approval by the Southold Planning Board on March 4, The applicant proposes the following modifications to the subdivision sketch plan of January 21 , 1985 on a new sketch plan entitled "Breezy Shores , " dated October 23, 1985 : 1 . Project is now single-phased and plans are submitted for the entire site . Previously on Sage Property the plans called for a total of 31 lots in two sections ; 19 in Section 1 and 12 in a future section (not detailed on the map) . The proposed plan for Breezy Shores is for a total of 23 cluster lots in conform- ance with the 2-acre zoning and available yield for the site . In addition, existing residential cottages , non-conforming under tle Code, will be removed as well as the ks on the east side of th These docks will be rep aced by a oating dock on the west side of the lagoon with 18 slips , a ramp and fixed platform to be utilized by residents in the eastern portion of the property. For the five homes proposed in the western portion of the site near Main Road, a smaller dock with 5 slips will be constructed for their use . A total of 32. 61 acres of open space will be preserved (61% of the upland area) which contains 16 . 8 acres of pond and wetlands . 2. No variances are required from the Zoning Board of Appeals . Previously, the Sage Property Sketch Plan required setback variances and lot area variances. 3+ Sage Road is relocated north on the eastern end of the site to allow for the design of cluster lots in conformance with Town cluster provisions and Suffolk County Health Dept. standards . The minimum lot size proposed on Breezy Shores is 42, 000 sq. ft. The previous Sage Property had lots with an average size of 12,000 sq. ft. The proposed plan seeks to eliminate the existing nonconformity of the 31 residential cottages, which are built on lot sizes of approximately 10 ,000 sq. ft. or less . * sketch plan -5- JAC PLANNING CORP. ATTACHMENT TO EAF (CONT'D. ) The water main presently runs along the existing Sage Road and is part of the distribution system of the Greenport Water District. New connections to the main will be provided for each of the new residences and an easement will be granted to the Greenport Water District to enable continued servicing of the main for the fourteen lots which it transects . In accordance with Chapter 44 of the Code of Southold, the applicant sets forth the following reasons why the proposed amended action will not have a significant effect on the environ- ment and should be issued a Negative Declaration by the Lead Agency: 1 . The proposed "Breezy Shores " represents an improvement in design and environmental parameters than the approved Sage Property Sketch Plan, which was determined not to have a significant effect on the environment. Likewise , the amended plan should also be granted a Negative Declaration. 2. Public water by the Greenport Water District is available on-site via an existing water main along Sage Road. New connections will be provided to the water main for each of the new residences . Sufficient supply of potable water is available to service this development, which is projected to have an average water use of 8, 050 gallons per day. The water requirements of the proposed project are less than if the 31 existing cottages were occupied (certificate of occupancies granted) or construction of the proposed Sage Property for 31 homes . Both of these alternatives would result in additional water usage ; estimated at an average of 10 , 850 gallons per day. 3. The test hole data indicate that soils on-site are capable of supporting subsurface septic tanks and cesspools for each residence . The lot sizes are in conformance with County Health Department standards for development with individual on-site subsurface systems . The systems can be designed on each lot to meet required separation distances mandated by the town and county. Furthermore , the proposed action will eliminate the present old subsurface systems that service the existing cottages which are proposed to be removed. The project site is located outside of the deep recharge area or Hydrogeologic Zone III as defined in the 208 study. The site is located in Hydrogeologic Zone IV. A significant portion of precipitation which is recharged to groundwater is eventually lost as underflow to Southold Bay and does not contribute to a prime recharge area. -6- 1AC PLANNING CORP.• • ATTACHMENT TO EAF (CONT'D. ) The project' s proposed low density below 1 unit per acre (0 .5) is expected to result in nitrate-nitro- gen concentration in the groundwater well below the drinking water standard of 10 .0 milligrams per liter. Water quality protection will be afforded by the low density of development and preservation of open space/recharge areas. With the sandy soils present on the site , it is expected that minimal lawn areas will be developed and therefore a low application of fertilizers is anticipated. In conclusion, public water supply to the residences will ensure a safe and reliable water supply system, without posing adverse environmental consequences to groundwater resources or to the service of the Greenport Water District. On-site subsurface systems will not threaten the quality of water supplies since nitrate-nitrogen concentration in groundwater will continue to be well below drinking water standards with implementation of the project. Furthermore, the proposed revised plan represents a reduction in homesites from the existing 31 cottages and 31 proposed building lots on the Sage Property Sketch Plan. The reduction of 8 homes (and approximately 20 people) and replacement of old outdated subsurface systems with modern sanitary systems will result in a decrease of expected nitrate-nitrogen concentration in groundwater and an overall benefit to the environment. 4. The existing Sage Road does not have any drainage facilities for containment and recharge of stormwater runoff. The proposed plan will provide for installation of roadway drainage facilities to contain 100% of the stormwater runoff on-site. This represents a beneficial impact to street drainage and eliminates the potential for ponding, erosion, etc . with the development of the proposed amended plan. 5. The existing bulkhead in the eastern portion of the site along Southold Bay was severly damaged by Hurricane Gloria (September 27, 1985) , The bulkhead will be restored with similiar materials to original condition under an approved Town Trustees permit (see attached permit) . -7- �^' �-- `" ,'mss "."�" �„4+F3. �'�' ��=-'- �.��,�k�-• ,R+�-e^^�' �' ��;n "�--- .z. y ,L- , • ,G _ t,�S�a-a`�.�cT-eR x e'�'� � -ga- 'y.�'' 9-` -1 Za Zli tv ce lu in LU L KLLF 1 L v N O J .� UA lu aA 3 r m° WO ✓y } � � ~ tW. _H V, s W �> Fm Im _g_ 'play '% > Rrr�n D'AMATO, FORCHELLI, DBERT, SCHWARTZ F3 MINEO COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P. 0. BOX 31 MINEOLA, NEW YORK 11501 ARMAND P. D'AMATO* WASHINGTON OFFICE JEFFREY D-FORCHELLI* (516) 248-1700 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N_W. JACK L. LIBERT'* WASHINGTON, D. C 20006 DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ* PETER R. MINEO* (202) 783-4802 THOMAS J. DUNCAN* January 22 , 1986 OF COUNSEL RICHARD C GOLDBERG*- JAMES W. PARES* STEPHEN GUARNERI* ROBERT A. MELILLO* PETER ALPERT* _-- MNER M1 Y BAR THOMAS V. PANTELIS* Mc.MBeR D BAR Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. David Emilita RE: Cluster Subdivision Breezy Shores Dear Dave: In connection with the above, I enclose herewith4 copy of the Certificate of Occupancy for the thirty-seven (37) existing buildings. Very truly yours, J FF Y ORC LLI JDF/js Enclosure TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NONCONFORMING PREMISES . DATE : July 24 , 1984 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the Pre C . 0.#Z12637 Land / X/ Builpng(s) �/ Use(s) located at 67380 Main Road Arshamomague Greenport Street Hamlet shown on County tax map as District 1000, Section 053 .00, Block 05 . 0 Lot 001 . 001 , does{not conform to the present Building Zone Code of the 'Town of Southold for the following reasons: There are 6 dwellings on one lot . There are 25 non-conforming­ seasonal cottages . On the basis of information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, it has been determined that the above nonconforming /_/ Land /g/ Building(s) /x/Use(s) existed on the effective date the present-Building Zone Code of-the Town of Southold, and may be continued pursuant to and subject to the appli- cable provisions of said Code. IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that, based upon information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, the occupancy and use for which this Certifi- Property contains 5-1 story houses , 1 -2 story tate is issued is as follows: house , 2-accessory bldgs . , 25 seasonal cottages , 2 garages , 2 sheds ( 37 bldgs . ) . This property has access to Rt . 25 a State maintained highway , in the A zone .Non-conforming seasonal dwellings Charlotte Sage , Michael Sage , James Sage The Certificate is issued to & pa ricia Sage . (owner, xllF3R9t9ta° (k�)of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval N/A UNDERWRITERS CER'T'IFICATE NO. N/A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the owner of the above premises HAS NOT CONSENTED TO AN INSPECTION of the premises by the Building Inspec- tor to determine if the premises comply with all applicable codes and ordin- ances, other than the Building Zone Code, and therefore, no such inspection has been conducted. This Certificate, therefore, does not, and is not intended to certify that the premises comply with all other applicable codes and regula- tions. Boi!dino Inspector — � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NONCONFORA'IING PRElIISES DATE : July 24 , 1984 THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the Pre C . O .## 12637 Land / X/ Building(s) / X/ Use(s) located at 67380 Main Road Arshamomague Greenport Street Hamlet shown on County tax map as District 1000, Section 053 . 00. Block 05 . 00 Lot 001 . 001 doe<not)conform to the present Building Zone Code of the Town of Southold for the following reasons: There are 6 dwellings on one lot . There are 25 non-conforming seasonal cottages . On the basis of information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, it has been determined that the 'above nonconforming /—/ Land /j / Building(s) /X/Use(s) existed on the effective date the present Building Zone Code of the Town of Southold, and may be continued pursuant to and subject to the appli- cable provisions of said Code. IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that, based upon information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, the occupancy and use for which this Certifi- Property contains 5-1 story houses , 1 -2 story tate is issued is as follows: house , 2-accessory bldgs . , 25 seasonal cottages , 2 garages , 2 sheds ( 37 bldgs . ) . This property has access to Rt . 25 a State maintained highway , in the A zone . Non-conforming seasonal dwellings . Charlotte Sage , Michael Sage , James Sage The Certificate is issued to & Patricia Sage . (owner, � S��N<3D AFS) of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval N/A UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE NO. N/A NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the owner of the above premises HAS NOT CONSENTED TO AN INSPECTION of the premises by the Building Inspec- tor to determine if the premises comply with all applicable codes and ordin- ances, other than the Building Zone Code, and therefore, no such inspection has been conducted. This Certificate, therefore, does not, and is not intended to certify that the premises comply with all other applicable codes and regula- tions. Buiidir- Inspector FORM NO. 6 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Building Department Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Instructions A. This application must be filled in typewriter OR ink, and submitted in duplicate to the Building Inspec- tor with the following, for new buildings or new use: 1. Final survey of property with accurate location of all buildings, property lines, streets, and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. Final approval of Health Dept. of water supply and sewerage disposal—(S-9 form or equal). 3. Approval of electrical installation from Board of Fire Underwriters. 4. Commercial buildings, Industrial buildings, Multiple Residences and similar buildings and installa- tions, a certificate of Code compliance from the Architect or Engineer responsible for the building. 5. Submit Planning Board approval of completed site plan requirements where applicable. B. For existing buildings (prior to April 1957), Non-conforming uses, or buildings and "pre-existing" land uses: 1. Accurate survey of peoperty showing all property lines, streets, buildings and unusual natural or topographic features. 2. Sworn statement of owner or previous owner as to use, occupancy and condition of buildings. 3. Date of any housing code or safety inspection of buildings or premises, or other pertinent informa- tion required to prepare a certificate. C. Fees: 1. Certificate of occupancy $5.00 2. Certificate of occupancy on pre-existing dwelling or land use $5.00 3. Copy of certificate of occupancy $1.00 Date . . . .a. y. . . , . .M71.9. . .84 . . . . . . . . . . . . New Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . Old or Pre-existing Building . . XXX Vacant Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . Location of Property 7 . . , , _ , . Main Road Arshamomaque /-` House No. Street Hamlet Owner or Owners of Property Charlotte Sage, Michael Sade, James Sage &. PA .T1Cia Sa County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . . , . 053 . 00. . . . Block . . . O5 . 00 . , , , Lot . . . . . I -. . . Subdivision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Filed Map No. . . . . . . . . . .Lot No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Permit No. . . . . . . . . . . Date of Permit . . . . . . . . . .Applicant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Health Dept. Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Labor Dept. Approval . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Underwriters Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Planning Board Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Request for Temporary Certificate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Final Certificate . . . . . .XX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fee Submitted $ . 15 . 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction on above described building and qrmit meets all app bl co es and regulations. Applicant . . /, ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Irvin L. Price, J Attorney/Agent for Rw. to 10.78 Appl cant i �`{ ?�.2 l X STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ss. : � I, CHARLOTTE SAGE, residing at Sa Ii New York, being duly sworn, deposes and say That I am one of the present owners of the at Main Road (Route 25) , Greenport, New York, designated on the Suffolk' County Tax Map as Distric 1000, Section 053.00, Block 05 . 00 , Lot vTrr:vvr, and more particularly set forth on survey for Richard Mohring dated March 24 , 1984 by Young & Young attached hereto; i That I am familiar with said premises; That the structures situated thereon and highlighted in red on the attached survey for Richard Mohring have been designed, arranged'. and physically occupied as single family dwellings or seasonal cottages as depicted on said survey; it That the condition of the existing structures on the premises is good; i That I make this affidavit in the knowledge that the Building Department of the Town of Southold will rely on the accuracy thereof in issuing a certificate of occupancy for a non-conforming pre- existing re-existing use for the structures depicted on the attached survey. Charlotte Sage Sworn to before me this 701w day of May, 1984 . /dul No,tar Public/ IRVING PFI.CE, JR. NOTARY FOLIC, 3P'„_ 1'JRK iaiding Ci. ::g: cf zypalr;lmen� u' Yv Cnmmhs:on Excirrrrs ',;arc5 -,I IcF_X_ JL f^+ i /i v✓i/?o N I j Memorandum from . . . BUILDING INSPECTORS OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL,BOX 728,SOUTHOLD,N.Y. 11971 �G 765-1802 x L i P-z tl r 1 t� ti i77, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NONCONFORMING PREMISES THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the Land Building(s) / Uses) located at Street Hamlet shown on County tax map as District 1000, Section C'j 3 , mock C) S , Lot O 3 , does�.not�conform to the present Building Zone Code of the Town of Southold for the following reasons: n 'P C On the basis of information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, it has been determined that the above nonconforming /—/ Land /// Building(s) _ I — /I/Use(s) existed on the effective date the present Building Zone Code of the Town of Southold, and may be continued pursuant to and subject to the appli- cable provisions of said Code. IT IS FURTHER CERTIFIED that, based upon information presented to the Building Inspector's Office, the occupancy and use for which this Certifi- cate is issued is as follows: The Certificate is issued to (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval UNDERWRITEFtS CER'TIFICAT`E NO. }'i•-tt Y NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the owner of the above premises ILSS NOT CONSENTED TO AN INSPECTION of the premises by the Building Inspec- tor to determine if the premises comply with all applicable codes and ordin- ances, other than the Building Zone Code, and therefore, no such inspection has been conducted. This Certificate, therefore, does not, and is not intended to certify that the premises comply with all other applicable codes and regula- tions. 3ui:di g 'n=_pector — IZA TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPERTY RECORD CARD OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT FORMER OWNER N r E 1 ACR. 30 S W TYPE OF BUILDING I` C�i- ".' �� Imo' �` � U� ,� -,-- :f �:.n✓I t•� ^, RES. SEAS. VL. FARM COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS �'• Q .�o--tCl 1+/.�.' . �, 1 9 '? 3 P! - _ , -!' p7 - n h/ I:Ir.n . .6 rt ____ 17-Za r — Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER Ylwdlcnd FRONTAGE ON ROAD Meadowland DEPTH O' Hofue Plot BULKHEAD _ Total Z l�G g � l l-S Sl�✓ C�t �-r PCASf`�e WAS OA Cla o ' Pw olo�no� U�C�SYLfa � Q��K . LK �pwfi �Ju� �� � -r 11 w►5�«sscw� . a. ZNei� s G4tW 6kj4-\crnv4MVrs 4 -2, uaw cis . iS V�¢ceSszr� , r [I Pcz-1 ekLwUYK caO �T-40"P14tQ Clti iFl-1 S , 3h,{4rztM Ei(o �p SKt.-TcN AerizvAi­ —saw abo z N.orwv Goti1J�tJT10Na` Yltrw # c�F Lc-rv&L- G C '_% EEXisn&Cj /JOT' AP*Wem6j;p .� Town Ball, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T. F1 PRY FELEPHONF. TOWN CLERK (5 16) 765-1801 REGISTRAR or VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 24, 1986 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: The Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on January 21, 1986, adopted a resolution authorizing you to consider the property of Bayview Development Corp. , entitled "Breezey Shores", located at Greenport, as being developed in the Cluster Concept. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk G�rFU(%fr PSD TS0U -II LD , . T �•-111 �� Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 31, 1985 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: "Breezy Shores" Sage Property Dear Mrs. Terry: In response to your correspondence of December 19 , being as the above mentioned property lies in a fragile area, the Planning Board believes that some of this area would be preserved by clustering. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, Lftt �i CSC c BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. , CHA RMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary z = •Ln Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T.TERRY TELEPHONE TOWN CLERK (516)765-1801 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 19, 1985 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: The Southold Town Board, at their work session on December 17th, reviewed your referral relative to proposed cluster concept for the Sage property, known as "Breezy Shores". The Town Board will again consider this matter on December 27th and would like an explanation from the Planning Board giving your reasons for considering this as a cluster concept. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk ���V��LYn,� PLAINN NI (} D TON SO HQLD SLTFOY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 4 , 1985 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: "Breezy Shores" Sage Property Dear Mrs. Terry: At the December 2 , 1985 Planning Board meeting, the Board referred the above mentioned subdivision to the Town Board for their approval of the cluster concept. Enclosed are three copies of the sketch map, metes and bounds description, copy of the Planning Board resolution and correspondence from the attorney regarding this subdivision. If you have any questions, or require any additional information, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, Ve BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. , CHAI AN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. PL•XYNIN � O,A=RD TOS O�V SO -HOLD SUn 'F'FOL t ItNTY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 4 , 1985 Mr . Jeffrey D. Forchelli Attorney at Law 120 Mineola Blvd. Mineola, NY 11501 Re: "Breezy Shores" Dear Mr. Forchelli : The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, December 2 , 1985 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the sketch map for the subdivision to be known as "Breezy Shores" to the Town Board for their approval of the location of this proposed cluster development. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAI N SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze , Secretary cc: Town Clerk Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 10 _qS D'AMATO, FORCHELLI, LIBERT, SCHWARTZ F3 MINEO COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P. O. BOX 31 MINEOLA, NEW YORK 11501 ARMAND P. D'AMATO JEFFREY D. FORCHELLI (516) 248-1700 TELECOPIER:(516)248-1729 JACK L. LIBERT DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ OF COUNSEL PETER R.MINED JAMES W. PARES THOMAS J. DUNCAN November 18 , 1985 ROBERT A. MELILLO PETER ALPERT MEMBER N Y 0 D C BARS ANTON J. BOROVINA RICHARD C. GOLDBERG' STEPHEN GUARNERI THOMAS V. PANTELIS Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 RE: Application of Bayview Development Corp. Sage Property Cluster Development located at Greenport Dear Mr. Orlowski: In connection with the amended map in the above matter, I would like to set forth that the 11. 551 acre underwater parcel will be open land belonging to the twenty-three (23) proposed homeowners. In addition, we would like to restrict the area East of the right-of-way on Lots 20 through 22 to no development, i.e. , left in its natural state. We believe this would substantially improve e proposed map. Very truly you s, t JEF Y D. FOR HELLI JDF/js G_%zcy D'AMATO, FORCHELLI, LIBERT, SCHWARTZ F3 MINEO COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P. O. BOX 31 ARMAND P. D'AMATO MIN EOLA, NEW YORK H501 JEFFREY D. FORCHELLI (516)248-1700 TELECOPIER:(516)248-1729 JACK L. LIBERT DONALD JAY SCHWART! OF COUNSEL PETER R. MINEO JAMES W.PARES THOMAS J. DUNCAN November 26, 1985 ROBERT A.MELILLO PETER ALPERi Memeen N.. a o c. eons ANTON J. BOROVINA RICHARD C GOLDBERG- STEPHEN GUAR.NERI THOMAS V.PANTELIS Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 RE: Application of Bayview Development Corp. Sage Property Cluster Development located at Greenport Dear Mr. Orlowski: In connection with the above, I would like to correct the second paragraph of my letter dated November 18 , 1985 . The area to be restricted is West of the right-of-way. In other words, between the right-of-way and the main road. In addition, if the map is approved as subm' t ed, we would like to file Covenants and Restrictions limitin it use to resi- dential development. Very truly yo rs, EFF R CHE LI JDF/ls �—J n1w �� � at. D'AMATO, FORCHELLI, LIBERT, SCHWARTZ 8 MINEO KV COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P. O. BOX 31 ARMAND P. D'AMATO* MINEOLA, NEW YORK 11501 WASHINGTON OFFICE JEFFREY D_FORCHELLI* (516) 248-1700 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W_ JACK L. LIBERT* WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ* PETER R MINED* (202)783-4802 THOMAS J. DUNCAN* November 7 , 1985 OF COUNSEL RICHARD C. GOLDBERG*, JAMES W_PARES* STEPHEN GUARNF.RI* ROBERT A. MELILLO* PETER ALPERT- — MF.MBFN. THOMAS V. PANTELIS* MeM Bee o c BnB Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Ms. Diane M. Schultze Secretary RE: Cluster Subdivision Breezy Shores Dear Diane: In connection with the above, I enclose herewith twelve (12) copies of the Revised Sketch Plan along with two (2) copies of the Amended Environmental Assessment Form. Very truly ur LU, JE E D. ORCHELLI JDF/ js Enclosures P. S. Enclosed are two descriptions of the entire property. This will be needed by the Town Board for cluster approval . s BAYVIE*EVELOPMENT CORP . BREEZY SHORES SCHEDULE A Nov The premises in which the insured has the estate or interest covered by this policy PARCEL I ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate , lying and be- ing at Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument set on the easterly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) where the same is intersected by the northerly line of lands as shown on Subdivision of Southold Shores , Suffolk County, file map number 3853; RUNNING THENCE along the easterly side of Main Road the following four courses and distances : 1. North 15 degrees 13 minutes 47 seconds east 127 .90 feet to a point; 2 . North 7 degrees 21 minutes 28 seconds east 677. 17 feet to a point; 3. North 12 degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds east 376 . 45 feet to a point; and 4 . North 7 degrees 21 minutes 28 seconds east 165 . 76 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along the southeasterly line of lands now or formerly of Long Island Rialroad north 42 degrees 20 minutes 23 seconds east 442 . 74 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along the southwesterly line of lands now or formerly of James Posillico, Posillico Construction Co. Inc. , Anesthesia Group and Alexander McBride the following four courses and distances : 1. South 45 degrees 21 minutes 46 seconds east 205 . 42 feet to a point; 2. South 55 degrees 49 minutes 26 seconds east 2735 . 76 feet to a monument; 3 . South 39 degrees 35 minutes 10 seconds east 1326 . 69 feet to a monument; and -^on� nued- SCHEDULE A (CONTINUED) PARCEL I CONTINUED 4 . South 39 degrees 35 minutes 10 seconds east 232. 72 feet to the approximate high water mark of Shelter Island Sound; RUNNING THENCE along the approximate high water mark of Shelter Island Sound the following five tie line courses and distances: 1. South 81 degrees 29 minutes 38 seconds west 21. 81 feet; 2. North 74 degrees 33 minutes 18 seconds west 51. 30 feet; 3 . North 66 degrees 24 minutes 48 seconds west 47. 68 feet; 4 . North 70 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds west 96 . 13 feet; and 5 . South 89 degrees 20 minutes 28 seconds west 70 . 96 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along a wood bulkhead the following nine courses and distances: 1. South 31 degrees 18 minutes 45 seconds west 11. 31 feet to a point; 2 . North 64 degrees 40 minutes 01 seconds west 197 . 34 feet to a point; 3 . North 64 decrees 37 minutes 42 seconds west 380 . 06 feet to a point; 4 . North 64 degrees 32 minutes 31 seconds west 289 . 24 feet to a point; 5 . South 76 degrees 09 minutes 50 seconds west 43 . 85 feet to a point; 6 . North 64 degrees 27 minutes 27 seconds west 220 . 43 feet to a point; 7 . North 17 degrees 10 minutes 37 seconds west 36 . 68 feet to a point; 8 . North 68 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds west 308 . 25 feet to a point; and 9 . North 35 degrees 02 minutes 49 seconds east 43 . 24 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along the approximate high water mark of Shelter Island Sound and the "Basin" the following eighteen tie line courses and distances : 1. North 69 degrees 08 minutes 00 seconds east 37. 16 feet to a point; 2. North 83 degrees 44 minutes 07 seconds east 22 . 45 feet to a point; -continued- SMEDULE A CONTINUED PARCEL I CONTINUED 3 . North 45 degrees 28 minutes 13 seconds east 22 . 99 feet to a point; 4 . North 1 degree 13 minutes 46 seconds east 54 .52 feet to a point; 5 . North 18 degrees 28 minutes 55 seconds west 178 . 54 feet to a point; 6 . North 31 degrees 30 minutes 56 seconds west 40 . 19 feet to a point; 7 . North 67 degrees 19 minutes 26 seconds west 36 . 31 feet to a point; 8 . South 70 degrees 40 minutes 38 seconds west 37 . 59 feet to a point; 9 . South 27 degrees 53 minutes 33 seconds west 29 . 58 feet to a point; 10 . South 0 degrees 16 minutes 23 seconds west 73 . 63 feet to a point; 11. South 4 degree 51 minutes 27 seconds west 146 . 85 feet to a point; 12. 'South 3 degrees 07 minutes 36 seconds west 168 . 58 feet to a point; 13. South 36 degrees 26 minutes 28 seconds east 25 . 57 feet to a point; 14 . South 7 degrees 04 minutes 51 seconds west 109 . 75 feet to a point; 15 . North 49 degrees 17 minutes 24 seconds west 40 . 93 feet to a point; 16 . North 2 degrees 15 minutes 32 seconds east 31. 60 feet to a point; 17 . North 48 degrees 14 minutes 49 seconds west 61. 23 feet to a point; 18 . North 57 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds west 32 . 07 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along the easterly and northerly lines of lands now or formerly of Howard and Dorothy Zehner the following two courses and dis- tances : 1. North 4 degrees 11 minutes 12 seconds east 771. 06 feet to a point; and 2 . North 80 degrees 27 minutes 08 seconds west 453 . 84 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along lands now or formerly of William Kilian, Joseph and Marie Knizak, Joseph and Rose Zuda and Murray and Selma Jacobs the following five courses and distances: -continued- SCHEDULE A (CONTINUED) PARCEL I CONTINUED 1. North 7 degrees 43 minutes 02 seconds east 35 . 83 feet to a point; 2 . North 61 degrees 29 minutes 58 seconds west 239 .75 feet to a point; 3 . North 76 degrees 56 minutes 38 seconds west 154 . 13 feet to a point; 4 . North 77 degrees 56 minutes 38 seconds west 218 feet to a point; and 5 . South 12 degrees 03 minutes 32 seconds west 106 . 19 feet to the approximate high water mark of the "Basin" ; RUNNING THENCE along the approximate high water mark of the "Basin" the following twenty-three tie line courses and distances : 1. 'North 53 degrees 30 minutes 11 seconds west 32. 97 feet to a point; 2 . North 81 degrees 39 minutes 02 seconds west 91. 68 feet to a point; 3 . North 69 degrees 06 minutes 55 seconds west 144 . 84 feet to a point; 4 . South 77 degrees 32 minutes 28 seconds west 85. 62 feet to a point; 5 . North 84 degrees 55 minutes 15 seconds west 46 . 29 feet to a point; 6 . North 65 deqrees 57 minutes 15 seconds west 61. 09 feet to a point; 7. South 78 degrees 51 minutes 55 seconds west 90 . 31 feet to a point; 8 . South 25 degrees 15 minutes 03 seconds west 96 . 05 feet to a point; 9 . South 3 degrees 18 minutes 30 seconds west 107. 58 feet to a point; 10 . South 14 degrees 30 minutes 58 seconds west 42. 56 feet to a point; 11. South 1 degree 29 minutes 18 seconds west 51. 75 feet to a point; 12. South 31 deqrees 47 minutes 24 seconds east 55 . 37 feet to a point; 13. South 54 degrees 31 minutes 33 seconds east 43. 32 feet to a point; 14 . South 70 degrees 35 -inutes 52 seconds east 58. 24 feet to a point; 15. South 44 degrees 03 minutes 17 seconds east 47. 42 feet to a point; 16 . South 38 degrees 03 minutes 53 seconds east 46 . 81 feet to a point; -continued- SCHEDULE A (CONTINUED) PARCEL I CONTINUED 17 . South 74 degrees 21 minutes 02 seconds east 56 . 14 feet to a point; 18 . South 40 degrees 51 minutes 45 seconds east 62 . 14 feet to a point; 19 . South 35 degrees 14 minutes 07 seconds east 64 . 61 feet to a point; ' 20 . South 30 degrees 47 minutes 59 seconds east 18 . 09 feet to a point; 21. South 79 degrees 55 minutes 17 seconds east 47 . 45 feet to a point; 22. South 65 degrees 45 minutes 22 seconds west 19 . 34 feet to a point; and 23. North 76 degrees 27 minutes 07 seconds west 17 . 63 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along the northerly line of lands shown on subdivision "Southold Shores" filed map number 3853 north 76 degrees 27 minutes 34 se- conds west and through a monument 945 . 33 feet to the easterly side of Main Road (N.Y. S. Route 25) at the point or place of BEGINNING. BAYVIE> EVELOPMENT CORP . B EEZY SHORES SCHEDULE A The premises in which the insured has the estate or interest covered by this policy PARCEL II ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and be- ing at Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being more particularly bound and described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeasterly corner of the herein described premises where same intersects the southeasterly corner of lands now or formerly of John H. Mulholland; RUNNING THENCE along the approximate high water mark of Shelter Island Sound and the "Creek" the following twenty-five courses and distances: 1. South 59 degrees 14 minutes 34 seconds west 49 . 84 feet to a point; 2. South 87 degrees 14 minutes 26 seconds west 60 . 42 feet to a point; 3 . North 77 degrees 03 minutes 09 seconds west 78 . 38 feet to a point; 4 . North 71 degrees 42 minutes 05 seconds west 167. 77 feet to a point; 5 . North 73 degrees 51 minutes 08 seconds west 141. 22 feet to a point; 6. North 68 degrees 04 minutes 00 seconds west 237 feet to a point; 7 . North 61 degrees 21 minutes 05 seconds west 198. 05 feet to a point; 8 . North 42 degrees 14 minutes 52 seconds west 90 feet to a point; 9 . North 26 degrees 01 minutes 22 seconds east 86. 77 feet to a point; 10 . South 1 degree 13 minutes 04 seconds east 83 . 96 feet to a point; 11. South 33 degrees 35 minutes 08 seconds east 54 . 07 feet to a point; 12. North 57 degrees 10 minutes 41 seconds east 46 . 76 feet to a point; 13. South 5 degrees 15 minutes 25 seconds west 45. 15 feet to a point; 14 . South 52 degrees 29 minutes 59 seconds east 27. 25 feet to a point; 15 . North 79 degrees 35 minutes 04 seconds east 112. 08 feet to a point; 16 . South 19 degrees 14 minutes 31 seconds east 95 . 11 feet to a point; 17. South 66 degrees 43 minutes 36 seconds east 22. 49 feet to a point; a_ SCHEDULE A (CONTINUED) PARCEL II CONTINUED 18. North 15 degrees 33 minutes 07 seconds east 97. 79 feet to a point; 19 . North 35 degrees 59 minutes 31 seconds east 35 . 54 feet to a point; 20. South 76 degrees 46 minutes 24 seconds east 91. 98 feet to a point; 21. South 14 degrees 31 minutes 40 seconds east 68. 49 feet to a point; 22. South 36 degrees 35 minutes 53 seconds east 84 . 30 feet to a point; 23. South 74 degrees 10 minutes 59 seconds east 72. 31 feet to a point; 24. North 80 degrees 47 minutes 59 seconds east 80. 62 feet to a point; and 25 . South 58 degrees 18 minutes 46 seconds east 206 . 98 feet to the southwest corner of lands now or formerly of John H. Mulholland; RUNNING THENCE along the southerly line of lands now or formerly of John J. Mulholland south 80 degrees 36 minutes 55 seconds east 112. 80 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. SoS�FFQ�co Jun 2, o 1985 Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SDUTHOLD. L.L, N.Y. 1171 �- TELEPHONE (516) 76E,-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3320 Application Dated December 31 , 1984 lo. - lo.-C, ` 4 r.. ,, fhnncllan+ !v 1.1 ay. JCI IICy D . IrVl-l.l,lcll Fl mato , Forchelli , Libert , Schwartz ; Mineo and Weinstein 120 Mineola Boulevard , Box 31 Mineola , NY 11501 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on the above appeal was considered , and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [X] Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100-31 [ ] Request for Upon application for BAYVIEW DEVELOPMENT CORP . (SAGE ) , by J . Forchelli , Esq . , 120 Mineola Boulevard , Mineola , NY 11501 for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance , Article III , Section 100-31 , Bulk Schedule , and Article XIII , Section 100-136A for approval of insufficient area of each lot in this proposed 19- lot cluster development or subdivision and insufficient setbacks . Location of Property : 67380 Main Road , Greenport , NY ; County Tax Map Parcel No . 1000-053-05-001 , 001 . 3 , 12 . 3 ; known and referred to as " Breezy Shores . " In this appeal , Bayview Development Corp . seeks numerous variances from the lot area , lot width , frontyard setback , and side yard requirements with respect to the 19 lots shown on a proposed subdivision of Section One of its property , plan updated December 18 , 1984 . Appellant is the owner of a tract of land comprising approxi - mately 83 acres of land bounded on the north by N . Y . S . Route 25 , or the south by that portion of Peconic Bay locally referred to as Pipes Cove . The premises are shown on the Suffolk County Tax Map as Dis- trict 1000 , Section 053 , Block 05 , Lots 1 , 1 . 3 , 12 . 3 . Appellant has filed a sketch plan for the development of Section One as a cluster development , pursuant to Section 100-136 of the Town Zoning Code . Although Section One comprises an area of 43 . 756 acres , 29 acres thereof consists of ponds , wetlands and marsh land , which is proposed as "open area " ; 2 . 5 acres proposed as a boat basin ; 1 . 556 acres consists of an " island" ; and the remaining six acres comprises 19 proposed subdivision lots adjacent to Pipes Cove , and which lots are the subject of this appeal . The 19 lots comprising Section One range in area from 9 ,000 sq . ft . to 25 ,000 sq . ft . with the average being approximately 12 ,000 sq . ft . in area . The lot widths along the southerly line of the private road range from 25 feet to 105 feet , with an average of approximately 67 feet . The frontyard setback is proposed to be 25 feet . Section 100-136 (A ) [2] of the Zoning Code provides as follows : " . . . (2 ) In a cluster development , lot area shall not be ern DATED: (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD ao� OF APPEALS I Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) Page 2 - Appeal No . 3320 Matter of BAYVIEW DEVELOPMENT CORP . Decision Rendered June 19 , 1985 reduced by more than fifty percent ( 50%) , and lot width and depth , front yard , rear yard , and side yards , shall not be reduced by more than thirty percent (30%) of the minimum requirements set forth in the Bulk and Parking Schedule . . . . " The premises are located in the "A-80" Agricultural and Residential Zoning District , and the Bulk and Parking Schedule requires a minimum lot area of 80 , 000 sq . ft . , minimum lmt width of 175 feet , a lot depth of 250 feet , front yard of 60 feet and rear yard of 75 feet ; one side yard of at least 20 feet and both side yards having a total of not less than 45 feet . It is apparent that none of the 19 lots comply with the code requirements for a cluster development with respect to lot area , lot width or front yard setbacks . The largest lot ( No . 1 ) has an area of 25 ,000 sq . ft . , or 63% of the required area . Four of the smallest lots ( 10 , 14 , 15 and 17 ) have an area of 9 ,000 sq . ft . , or 23% of the required lot area . The sideyard dimensions are not shown on the sketch plan , but appear to be substantially below the minimum requirements . An examination of the sketch plan indicates that Appellant proposes the land north of the 19 lots and across the private road , comprising 20 . 5 acres to be subdivided as another Section in the Future . No explanation is given why this land cannot be added to the lots in Section One to increase the lot areas and setback requirements to conform to the code requirements . It has been held by the courts (VanDusen v . Jackson , 35 AD2d . 58 ) that a Board of Appeals cannot under the semblance of a variance exercise legislative powers . It is apparent that the variances requested are substantial with respect to lot area , lot width , and other setback requirements and would affect each and every lot in the proposed subdivision . The effect of the grant of the variances requested would be to establish a zone district completely at odds with all other zone districts provided for in the zoning code and zoning map . This board does not be- lieve that it has the authority to create new zoning districts under the guise of a variance . Such authority is vested in the Town Board , the legislative body of the Town . Now , therefore , on motion by Mr . Grigonis , seconded by Mr . Sawicki , BE IT RESOLVED, that it is the determination of this Board that it is without jurisdiction to grant the relief as requested , and the appeal is therefore denied . Vote of the Board : Ayes : Messrs . Goehringer , Grigonis and Sawicki . (Member Douglass abstained . ) _ (Member Doyen was absent . ) This resolution was adopted by majority vote of the four members present . GER Z P . GOEHR NGER , AIRMAN � � lune 19 . 1985 D'AMATO, FORCHELLI, LIBERT, IOVINO, SCHWARTZ 8 MINED COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P. O. BOX 31 ARMAND P. D'AMATO- MINEOLA, NEW YORK 11501 WASHINGTON OFFICE JEFFREY D. FORCHELLI- (516) 248-1700 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. JACK L LIBERT'• WASHINGTON, D. C 20006 PETER A. IOVINO° (202) 783-4802 DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ• PETER R. MINEO` OF COUNSEL THOMAS J. DUNCAN* June 10, 1985 JAMES W. FARES' ROBERT A.MELILLO* RICHARD C GOLDBERG*o STEPHEN GUARNERI* 'MEMBER H Y. BAR PETER ALPERT' MEMBER o C BAR Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 RE: Application of Bayview Development Corp. Sage Property Cluster Development located at Greenport Dear Mr. Orlowski: In connection with the above application, I en ose herewith a list of shareholders of the corporation which ns he above property. Very truly yo rs, JE R D. O C LLI JDF/js Enclosure S ,A r Fl(1T,nK S . RICHARD MOHRING RR #1 056- 24--1537 Box 362 Mill Neck , N .Y . 11765 60 Shares RICHARD MOPPING , JR. 35 Mohring Bay Court 072-52-4625 Sayville, N .Y . 11709 40 Shares JEFFREY D . FORC3ELLI 1 JDF Court 131-36-0084 Oyster Bay, N .Y. 11771 23 Shares A.RNAND P . D' AM.ATO 15 Ostend Road 113-34-1810 Island Park, N .Y . 11558 16 Shares JACK L . LIBERT 141 Willow Road 128-38-5980 Woodsburgh, N .Y. 11598 13 Shares DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ 3653 Mahlon Brower Drive 107-38-1977 Oceanside, N .Y. 11572 9 Shares PETER R. MINCU 21 Beikiey Road 062-44-6130 Mineola , N . Y. 11501 9 Shares KENNETH J. WEINSTEIN 2929 Bay Drive 061-38-9008 Merrick, N .Y. 11566 12 Snares THOMAS J. DUNCAN 2 Meadowbrook Road 063-40-1584 Syosset , N.Y . 11791 6 Shares JAMES W. PARES 19 Ridge Road 126-16-5041 Sayville, N.Y. 11709 6 Shares RICHARD C. GOLDBERG 3977E Sedgwick Avenue 058-38-3552 Apt. 14A Bronx, N.Y . 10463 3 Shores STEPHEN GUARNERZ R.D. 2 -- Hilltop Road 058-40-7269 Oyster Bay, N . Y . 11771 2 Shares PETER ALPERT 570 Saddle Ridge Road 066-40-3579 Woodmere, N .Y . 11598 1 Share COUNTY OF SUFFOLK I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING (516) 360-5513 LEE E. KOPPELMAN DIRECTOR OF PLANNING June 5, 1985 Town of Southold Board of Appeals Re: Application of "Bayview Development Corp.", Town of Southold (Appeal No. 3320) . Gentlemen: Please be advised that pursuant to Sections 1323 to 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter, the above captioned application will not be reviewed because of noncompli- ance with requirements for notice and maps as stipulated in Informational Bulletin No. 8 of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. The following information will only be accepted upon submission through the offices of the municipal referring agency. Please provide the following: (1) a map depicting the subject parcel(s) in- cluding upland/wetland acreages; (2) a dwelling unit yield map acceptable to the Town of Southold; (3) a copy of the Town Board resolution authorizing clustering; (4) depict various acreages referred to in correspondence for subdivision sketch plan - last revised January 21, 1985 (with a net area of 39.056 acres) ; (5) an overall development plan of petitioner's landholdings in the area; and (6) avail- able information demonstrating compliance with the SEQRA requirements. Thank you. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning by C'; \\Q�� Gerald G. Newman Chief Planner VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY • HAUPPAUGE.L. L. NEW YORK • 11788 i • PLAN_ NINE BO,ARD 614O Tov O SQ 2 KqD SU_FF �OK�>aGONY 1 � Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 6 , 1985 Jeffrey Forchelli Attorney at Law 120 Mineola Blvd. Mineola, NY 11501 Re: Sage Property Section I , Cluster Dear Mr. Forchelli: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, March 4 , 1985 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the aketch map for the cluster subdivision of "Sage Property, Section I" located at Greenport for 19 lots on 38 acres , plans dated as last revised January :.21 , 1985 subject to the approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals for the variances needed . If you have any questions , please don ' t hesitate to contact our office . Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN UTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze , W"c( etary cc : Zoning Board of Appeals PL"AN'NING`BOARD � V '(,0 . TOR' OI SOU LD S UFFOJLTY Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 NEGATIVE DECLARATION March 4 , 1985 Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617 , Section 617 . 10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION The major subdivision of "Sage Property, Section I" is a cluster subdivision of 19 lots on 38 acres located at Greenport. The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons : An environmental assessment has been submitted which indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. Because there has been no correspondence from the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time , it is assumed that there is no objection nor comments by that agency. The Suffolk County Department of Health Services is in agreement with our initial determination, they have no objection to our designation of lead agency status , they have no record of an application to the department,project can be served by community water supply; further comments cannot be made at this time due to the difficulty in ascertaining the scope of the project without information on the future sections . The project will meet all the requirements of the Code of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations . Further information can be obtained by contacting Diane M. Schultze , Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 Copies mailed to the following; Robert Flack, DEC Commissioner NYS , DEC at Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Francis J . Murphy Jeffrey Forchelli, esq . Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.L, N.Y. 11971 II °` ✓ - ail TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER. CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI TO : Bennett Orlowski , Jr . , Planning Board Chairman FROM: Jerry Goehringer , Board of Appeals Chairman DATE : February 8 , 1985 SUBJECT : Applications Involving Planning Board We would like to bring you up-to-date and to request your comments or recommendations on each of the following matters recently filed with our office prior to the advertising deadline , if possible . (Once our hearing is concluded , no additional input legally can be accepted for consideration . ) Date Filed Matter of Tentative Deadline 2- 1 -85 Dominick Varano ( Subdivision ) 3-4-85 1 -28-85 Emilia T. Pike ( Subdivision ) 3-4-85 1 -29-85 Briden Machine ( Site Plan , etc . ) 3-4-85 1 -28-85 Wm . & Helen Coster ( " " ) 3-4-85 1 -9-85 Joseph Lizewski ( Hearing 3-7-85 ) 1 -9-85 Colgate Design ( 7-11 , Cut ) (Hearing 3-7-85 ) 12-4-84 Cutchogue Free Library (Hearings 2- 14-85 ) 2-8-85 /auyview l Millman (Spec . Exc . & Var ) 3-4-85 12-31 -84 Development Corp . 3-4-85 The following matters have received your responses and have been arranged to be held for hearings in the immediate future : Thomas Perillo (Hearing 2- 14-85 ) Robert and Aldona Norkus (Hearing 3-7-85* ) John and Frances DiVello (Hearing 3-7-85* ) Alice D . Currie (Hearing 3-7-85 ) Meehan and Leonardi ( Hearing 3-7-85 ) PT ( jIID T WY 5 LD bf 2F S ' () $ Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 8 , 1985 Jeffrey Forchelli Attorney at Law 120 Mineola Blvd. Mineola, NY11501 Re : Sage Properties Cluster Dear Mr . Forchelli: As per your request, enclosed herewith is a copy of the Town Board' s decision regarding the above proposal . If you have any questions , please don' t hesitate to contact our office Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWNPLANN.ING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze , Secretary enc. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 JI!DITH l_ 11 RRY -CF:LHPHONE TOWN( IIRK n (516) 7654801 Ri:GiSrkn R of Vi I NiS[ \i M u S OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 7, 1985 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Dear Bennie: The Southold Town Board at their regular meeting held on February 5, 1985 authorized the Planning Board to consider the property of Sage Properties, Section I, located at Greenport, New York, to be developed in the cluster concept. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk D'AMATO, FORC-1ELLI, LIBERT, IOVINO, SCHWARTZ 8 MINEO COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P O. BOX 31 ARMAND P. D'AMATO* MINEOLA, NEW YORK IISOI WASHINGTON OFFICE JEFFREY D. FORCHELLI* (516) 248-1700 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W. JACK L LIBERT* WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 PETER A. IOVINO° (202)783-4802 DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ' PETER R MINED* OF COUNSEL THOMAS J. DUNCAN* January 25, 1985 JAMES W. PARES* RICHARD C GOLDBERG*. ROBERT A. MELILLO* STEPHEN GUARNERI* meea I eAa PETER ALPERT* °memeea c enx Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Ms. Diane M. Schultze Secretary RE: Application of Bayview Development Corp. Sage Property Cluster Subdivision Dear Diane: Enclosed please find the two additional copies of the sketch plan as per your request. Very trly yours, IrFOIRCHELLI MJ JDF/-js Enclosures (2) 0 D'AMAro, FORCHELLI, LIBERT, SCHWARTZ, MINED 8 WEINSTEIN COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD {} P. O. BOX 31 MINEOLA, NEW YORK 11501 (516) 246-1700 (516) 742-1400 ARMAND P. D'AMATO JAMES W. PARES JEFFREY D. FORCHELLI of COUNSEL JACK L LIBERT DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ January 22, 1985 PETER R. MINEO KENNETH J.WEINSTEIN THOMAS J. DUNCAN RICHARD C. GOLDBERG STEPHEN GUARNERI PETER ALPERT Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Ms. Diane M. Schultze Secretary RE: Application of Bayview Development Corp. Sage Property Cluster Subdivision Dear Diane: In connection with the above, I enclose herewith a metes and pounds description of the property along with a revised sketch plan map which shows the metes and bounds . Very truly yours, i EF FORCHELLI 1 JDF/js Enclosures (2) EXPRESS MAIL JR N 2 3 1985 SAGE CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT SECTION I ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being at Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, being more particularly bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Main Road (N.Y. S. Route 25) , the following four courses and distances from a monument set on the easterly side of Main Road (N.Y. S. Route 25) , where the same is intersected by the northerly line of lands as shown on Subdivision of Southold Shores, Suffolk County, filed Map Number 3853; RUNNING along the easterly side of Main Road: 1. North 15 degrees 13 minutes 47 seconds East 127 . 90 feet to a point; 2. North 7 degrees 21 minutes 28 seconds East 677. 17 feet to a point; 3. North 12 degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds East 376. 45 feet to a point; and 4. North 7 degrees 21 minutes 28 seconds East 165. 76 feet to lands now or formerly of the Long Island Rail Road, the true point or place of BEGINNING; RUNNING THENCE along the southeasterly line of lands now or formerly of Long Island Rail Road North 42 degrees 20 minutes 23 seconds East 442. 74 feet; RUNNING THENCE along the southwesterly line of lands now or formerly of James Posillico and Posillico Construction Co. Inc. , the following two courses and distances: 1. South 45 degrees 21 minutes 46 seconds East 205. 42 feet to a point; 2. South 55 degrees 49 minutes 26 seconds East 1346. 25 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE South 34 degrees 10 minutes 34 seconds (gest 456 . 94 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE southeasterly along the arc of a curve bearing to the right having a radius of 250 feet a distance of 67 . 39 feet; THENCE South 61 degrees 29 minutes 58 seconds East 281. 16 feet ; THENCE southeasterly along the arc of a curve bearing to the left having a radius of 200 feet a distance of 99. 48 feet; THENCE South 89 degrees 59 minutes 58 seconds East 267. 11 feet; THENCE southeasterly along the arc of a curve bearing to the right having a radius of 126. 19 feet a distance of 196. 02 feet; 2 - THENCE South 0 degrees 59 minutes 58 seconds East 80. 00 feet; THENCE southeasterly along the arc of a curve bearing to the left having a radius of 195 . 00 feet a distance of 78. 28 feet; THENCE South 23 degrees 59 minutes 58 seconds East 225. 69 feet; THENCE southeasterly along the arc of a curve bearing to the left having a radius of 380. 00 feet a distance of 269. 21 feet; THENCE South 64 degrees 35 minutes 28 seconds East 990. 90 feet; THENCE northeasterly along the arc of a curve bearing to the left having a radius of 50. 00 feet a distance of 59. 93 feet; THENCE easterly along the arc of a curve bearing to the right having a radius of 60. 00 feet a distance of 98. 10 feet; THENCE South 39 degrees 35 minutes 10 seconds East 422. 29 feet to the approximate high water mark of Shelter Island Sound; RUNNING THENCE along the approximate high water mark of Shelter Island Sound the following five tie line courses and dis- tances : 1. South 81 degrees 29 minutes 38 seconds West 21. 81 feet; 2. North 74 degrees 33 minutes 18 seconds West 51. 30 feet; 3. North 66 degrees 24 minutes 48 seconds West 47 . 68 feet; - 3 - r 4 . North 70 degrees 42 minutes 04 seconds West 96 . 13 feet; and 5. South 89 degrees 20 minutes 28 seconds West 70 . 96 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along a wood bulkhead the following nine courses and distances: 1 . South 31 degrees 18 minutes 45 seconds West 11. 31 feet to a point; 2 . North 64 degrees 40 minutes 01 seconds West 197 . 34 feet to a point; 3. North 64 degrees 37 minutes 42 seconds West 380 . 06 feet to a point; 4 . North 64 degrees 32 minutes 31 seconds West 289 . 24 feet to a point; 5. South 76 degrees 09 minutes 50 seconds West 43. 85 feet to a point; 6 . North 64 degrees 27 minutes 27 seconds West 220. 43 feet to a point; 7. North 17 degrees 10 minutes 37 seconds West 36. 68 feet to a point; 8 . North 68 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds West 308. 25 feet to a point; and 9. North 35 degrees 02 minutes 49 seconds East 43. 24 feet to a point; 4 - RUNNING THENCE along the approximate high water mark of Shelter Island Sound and the "Basin" the following eighteen tie line courses and distances: 1. North 69 degrees 08 minutes 00 seconds East 37 . 16 feet to a point; 2. North 83 degrees 44 minutes 07 seconds East 22. 45 feet to a point; 3. North 45 degrees 28 minutes 13 seconds East 22. 99 feet to a point; 4 . North 01 degree 13 minutes 46 seconds East 54. 52 feet to a point; 5. North 18 degrees 28 minutes 55 seconds West 178 . 54 feet to a point; 6. North 31 degrees 30 minutes 56 seconds West 40. 19 feet to a point; 7. North 67 degrees 19 minutes 26 seconds West 36 . 31 feet to a point; 8. South 70 degrees 40 minutes 38 seconds West 37 . 59 feet to a point; 9. South 27 degrees 53 minutes 33 seconds West 29. 58 feet to a point; 10. South 00 degrees 16 minutes 23 seconds West 73 . 63 feet to a point; 5 - 11. South 04 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds West 146. 85 feet to a point; 12. South 03 degrees 07 minutes 36 seconds West 168. 58 feet to a point; 13. South 36 degrees 26 minutes 28 seconds East 25. 57 feet to a point; 14. South 07 degrees 04 minutes 51 seconds West 109. 75 feet to a point; 15. North 49 degrees 17 minutes 24 seconds West 40. 93 feet to a point; 16. North 02 degrees 15 minutes 32 seconds East 31. 60 feet to a point; 17. North 48 degrees 14 minutes 49 seconds West 61. 23 feet to a point; 18. North 57 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds West 32. 07 feet to a point; RUNNING THENCE along the easterly and northerly lines of lands now or formerly of Howard and Dorothy Zehner the following two courses and distances: 1. North 04 degrees 11 minutes 12 seconds East 771. 06 feet to a point; and 2. North 80 degrees 27 minutes 08 seconds West 453. 84 feet to a point; 6 - RUNNING THENCE along lands now or formerly of William Kilian , Joseph and Marie Knizak, Joseph and Rose Zuda and Murray and Selma Jacobs the following four courses and distances: 1. North 07 degrees 43 minutes 02 seconds East 35 . 83 feet to a point; 2. North 61 degrees 29 minutes 58 seconds West 239. 75 feet to a point; 3 . North 76 degrees 56 minutes 38 seconds West 154. 13 feet to a point ; 4 . North 77 degrees 56 minutes 38 seconds West 218. 00 feet to a point; THENCE southwesterly along the arc of a curve bearing to the left having a radius of 220. 00 feet a distance of 76. 79 feet; THENCE westerly along the arc of a curve bearing to the right having a radius of 485. 00 feet a distance of 169 . 30 feet; THENCE North 77 degrees 56 minutes 38 seconds West 291. 19 feet; THENCE southwesterly along the arc of a curve bearing to the left having a radius of 430. 00 feet a distance of 185. 36 feet; THENCE South 71 degrees 21 minutes 28 seconds West 385. 09 feet; - THENCE southwesterly along the arc of a curve bearing to the left having a radius of 28. 56 feet a distance of 34 . 90 feet to the easterly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) ; 7 - THENCE along the easterly side of Main Road (N. Y. S Route 25) the following three courses and distances: 1 . North 07 degrees 21 minutes 28 seconds East 437 . 17 feet; 2 . North 12 degrees 23 minutes 13 seconds East 376. 45 feet; and 3 . North 07 degrees 21 minutes 28 seconds East 165. 76 feet to the lands now or formerly of Long Island Rail Road, the point or place of BEGINNING. 8 - �S�FF�LK P1I ''Sr:<D To v ci °so.0 [o�LD SLTF,FQ Rz : f� Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 January 10 , 1985 Jeffrey D. Forchelli Damato, Forchelli, Libert, Schwartz and Mineo and Weinstein 120 Mineola Blvd. Mineola, NY 11501 Re : Sage Property cluster subdivision Dear Mr. Forchelli: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, January 7 , 1985 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the cluster subdivision of the Sage Property to the Town Board for their approval of the cluster concept, for Section I . If you have any questions , please don' t hesitate to contact the office . Very truly yours , 1 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc : Henry E. Raynor, Jr. l i P S�FF�r�a. D T D „- F SC. - Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 January 10, 1985 Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Cluster proposal for Sage Properties , Section I Dear Mrs . Terry: Enclosed herewith, for the review of the Southold Town Board are three copies of the sketch map for the cluster proposal of Sage Properties , Section I , located at Greenport and an accurate metes and bounds description of the property. Please advise this office as to the action taken by the Town Board. Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze , Secretary cc : Town Board enc . Town Hall, 53095 Main Road v� • P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T. TERRY I'PLPPHONS TOWN('I I RK (516)765-1801 10 GIST R%R 01 VII AI,sr ii>rRS OFFICE OF THETOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 10, 1985 Diane: If the Town Board should recommend Sage Properties, Section I for a cluster concept on January 22nd, 1 shall need a metes and bounds description. The attached is really just north, east, south, west. Do you have, or can you obtain, a complete description? Thank you. v ' 0 v �Cy� SCIIEDULE A ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Hamlet of Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and State of New York, bounded and described as follows : Bounded on the North by Main Road (Route 25) and Long Island Railroad; Bounded on the West by land now or formerly of Reese ; Bounded on the South by Peconic Bay; and Bounded on the East by land now or formerly of Anesthesia Group, Inc. , Pasillico Construction Co. , Inc. , and ,James Pasillico, less parcels previously conveyed out by seller and their predecessor in title . BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN_OF SOUT-HOLD__—_ - in the Matter or the Petition of 5!YVIEW DEVF1,OPbNOTICE TNP CORP. - TO to the Board_of Appeals of the Town_of Southold_: ADJAC', NT PROPERTY OWNER TO: YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold to request a (Variance) (wee-al €1.___.:x _1 (S�ee+a�Re+i j (Other) [circle choice] 2, That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: _She_31�t�ttrlges.�3ntl-sLr•oLnc�7ug � _known a�the 1.&Ige°° propertyand-_ no-as--as-.BreLzy 3- That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: _-A Tz,sidential .DisYsict.__— ----------- -- ---------- = 4. that by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: variance of area and y�i r'ith rn-�11.ire*r+r_n1�St��I]d._�rari anr•� �'�.fmnt� Si da and zcYal .uf_1 _ Qz> ta4 -� t1�--ti _retnaining 19 cottacTes on leQtl lots. .._--- -_-- 5. That the provisi f the Southold Town Z 'Rg 'obe applicable to the relief sought by the under- s;g.,eri are Article 1 Section----_� a- ------- - ----- __---- - — 6. That within five: days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 765-1$09. 7. 1 hat before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to-the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated:_._pS22�er�t22;_2��778��/_719-$�� BAYV>E' DEVEIOPMEN'I'_CORP. - --- - Petitioner . - Ila I I Post Office Address c/o Jeffrey D. Forchelli, u 120 Mineola Boulevard Mi.neolaNew York 11501 _-_ 1 _ Yw � .. l • r a < r,)nCHEEL LBEnT, t" •d,`.r � A BOUL� .� - X1,9 �y S' s,—x s Howard Zehner Box 250 Greenport, New York 11944- p 1949pp 623 650 888 i .. u b� n � X o s t NC. 1 y d r � � d a n Z � T •1 f I IIp DEC 14 1984 D'AMATO, FORCHELLI, LIBERT, SCHWARTZ, MINEO F3 WEINSTEIN COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P O. BOX 31 MINEOLA, NEW YORK 11501 (516) 248-1700 (516)742-1400 ARMAND P. D'AMATO JAMES W. PARE5 JEFFREY D. FORCHELLI OF COUNSEL JACK L. LIBERT DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ December 11, 1984 PETER R. MINEO KENNETH J.WEINSTEIN THOMAS J. DUNCAN RICHARD C GOLDBERG STEPHEN GUARNERI PETER ALPERT Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 RE: Application of Bayview Development Corp. Sage Property Cluster Development located at Greenport Dear Mr. Orlowski: This letter will confirm that Section I in t bove appli- cation, which totals nineteen (19) units, will ha e total overall acreage of at least thirty-eight (38) acr s. Very truly yours, JEF REY 0 LI JDF/js s D'AMATO, FORCHELLI, LIBERT, SCHWARTZ, MINEO 8 WEINSTEIN COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P.O. BOX 31 MINEOLA, NEW YORK II501 (516)248-1700 (516)742-1400 ARMAND P. D'AMATO JAMES W. PARES JEFFREY D. FORCHELLI OF COUNSEL JACK L. LIBERT DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ November 19, 1984 PETER R. MINEO KENNETH J.WEINSTEIN THOMAS J. DUNCAN RICHARD C. GOLDBERG STEPHEN GUAR.NERI PETER ALPERT Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 RE: Application of Bayview Development Corp. Sage Property Cluster Development located at Greenport Dear Mr. Orlowski: This letter will confirm that in the event Section One of the above subdivision is approved substantially in accordance with the application presently on file, we will develo ection Two shown on said map in accordance with the Marine Commer is zoning if said is adopted by the Town Board. Very truly y urs C JE E D. 0 CHELLI JDF/js OWater Supply System Sea C40MY1+ e14tS A Public Water Supply System Individual Water Supply System(s) Other: 08. Comments: The Health Department' s primary environmental concern pertaining to development is that the applicant comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code especially Article V and VI , and relevant construction standards for water supply and sanitary sewage disposal . These considerations are to be reviewed completely at the time of application. Full consideration in placement of water supply wells and disposal systems is given to state and town wetland requirements . The Health Department maintains jurisdiction over final location of disposal and well systems and the applicant should not undertake to construct any water supply or disposal system without Health Department approval . Other portions of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code also apply to commercial development such as Article XII. The Lead Agency is requested to forward a copy of this form to the applicant with its findings. Ple�sc NoTe cot mwi,T j Lv creRS..pP�'/- wail bQ 2ey,�;?e.� . ® Fu ie rr�e-.e co.,,m o-n 7-s ca✓n n.or be en Vd Q— 4, T;V;s ri1"e GQuz r_o Ti42 cP:FC rCu L7y I't ASc aiz-ra, n,/q rile. Sccd-2 of T)4 �aJ ecT w; TTI 7'FIQ Lactf o` inF -7n ion G;u�.v ConCo. j 7H e. F.-.7"u22 Sec n on S Further comment may be provided upon completion of the application review. Name Phone y 9- 3 3 !g-, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 1984(� /� �9 PETER F. COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS.M.D..M.P.N. COMMISSIONER To: p/annI 6c ?Ci Date GcTo.F,�k , K iv y 5,7�9�h7a:i /2oac� .1ou7NdC1, V y. //971 A�Ten TJoiy, h71P.�onn a77 oRLo ws.e; %?. i Re: Dear /hm.o2Gcws K1' We are in receipt of your letter dated macro b at ii /2"ey concerning the above referenced project. O1. This Department has no objection to your designation of lead agency status.. O2. This Department is in agreement with your initial determination. 3. This Department does not agree with your initial determination. See Comments. 4. Insufficient information is available for technical comments. O5. There is no record of an application to this Department. A more accurate project location is needed. (Suffolk County Tax Map #) 6. This Department has received an application and it is : Complete Incomplete Other: 7. It appears that the project can be served by: Sewage Disposal System Sewer System and Treatment Works Subsurface Sewage Disposal System(s) Other: COUNTY CENTER 548-3318 RIVERHEAD.N.Y. 1 1 90 1 P ANI B17 D ''Ll TOW1 0? .41SOUS D S FQ�K OLI Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 9 , 1984 Mr. Jeffrey D . Forchelli Attorney at Law 120 Mineola Blvd. Mineola, NY 11501 Re : "Sage Property' cluster subdivision located at Greenport Dear Mr. Forchelli: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, October 8 , 1984 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare themselves lead agency with regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act for the major subdivision of the "Sage Property" located at Greenport. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board refer the major subdivision of "Sage Property" to the Town Board for their approval of the cluster concept, subject to receipt of the building lay-out for Section Two. The Board also requests that an application be made to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the variances needed. Please submit twelve ( 12) copies of the lay-out for Section Two; and see the Building Department on the procedure for applying to the Zoning Board of Appeals . If you have any questions , please don ' t hesitate to contact our office . Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN OUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARDOr By Diane M. Schultze , Secretary c,UFFQC,-n PJ:-A YN'l T W q -so I� LD SUFFq� C - OL,N, Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 11 , 1984 Environmental Analysis Unit DEC, Building 40, Room 219 Suny Stony Brook, NY 11794 Gentlemen: Enclosed find a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the major subdivision of "Sage Property" This project isunlisted and an initial determination of non-significance has been made . We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination in our role as lead agency. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until October 25 , 1984 . We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN UTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane nt©Scrthulrt�zke,' acrdet enc . cc : Department of Health Services 1984 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) 44%e4approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The app cancftse owneor of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . .... 3AYVTF4q.DEVEW)?=.�O$1�, $A �, PROPERTY ....................... .......................... .. .......... .... ...... ...... .... ... . ....... .. . . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggesttcd.)t1lQptj{r e' h Id by^the applicant£, •� 4. The landis a ..a.,_ a_...t_ „_a..a c.rr_„_ r,,.._ r,__, 84i@0 Re 4el!lews: Liber . ............ .... .. . . ... Page ............... . . ..... On . .................... . . . Liber . .... ...... ............. Page . .. ...... .... .. .. .. ... On Liber . .. .. ........ ...... ..... Page . .. ...... ..... . .. .. .. . On Liber . .. .. .. ...... ........... Page ..... .. ........ . . .. ... On . .. .. .... ... . ... . ...... Liber . .. ...... ............... Page . .. ...... .. .. .. . . .. . .. On . . ... .. . . .... .......... . as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . .. .VJEX4.}C,, ,$age,, ,, ,, ,, ,,•• , whose f J P e AMichael S. Sae and arae distributees.?X'@.C�l�'Io...��.S?4@,. ..�6..., .S�3.�....... .. .. ......4........... . ............................ ........ .... .. .... .. . . .. . . ...... .......... . ... . 5. The area of the land is . .. ..W,117. .... . acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid.eKeegt ... ,,, , ,• ,, . . . . ... .. .. .. .. .. .... . . .. .... .................. . . . . ... . .. .. .. .. . ....... .. .. .. .. . . . ... . .. ... ... . 7. The land is encumbered by . .... .4Q... .. .. . . .. .. .... . . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . . .. ...... . ... . . mortgage (s) as `aa-eallew9 (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. .. . . . . . . . Page . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . in original amount of $. . . . . .. . . . . .. . unpaid amount $ . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held by . . ... . . .. .. .. ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . address . ...... . . ... . . .... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . (b) 'Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. . . .. .. Page in original amount of . . . .. . . . . . . .. . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . held by . . ... ... . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .... . . .. .. .. . address . . . .. . . . . ... .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .... .. .. .. .. ...... ..... . .... (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . ... . . . . . . . Page . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. . in original amount of ... .. . . . . . . . . . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . held b ... .. . . . . .... .. .... .. . address . .. . . .. . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . ... . . . . . .. .. ... .... . . 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except WatQ .Tg4in casement, .held by.the.Inctorporated.Village..of.GxeenpQxt.. .. .. .. .. ...... . ............. .. 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts .A Resi(C d'ltial.A UO,AC i.aultux4 .Distxict......... .... .... . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . .. .... .. .. ...... ... ................ 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept :.... ........ ... . ... . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. ....... .......... ... . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . ..QiKQQP1?Qat:. .. . . .. . . ... . .. .. .. .... .. . ... .. . .. ............. . 13. Water mains will be laid by .eXist.iaq. . . . . .. . . .. .... . . .. .... .. .. .. .. .. . . . . ... ......... . end (a) (no) eher e Will be -nage got `--'-"=_q_id __ __. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by .eZiatillg. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. ....... . c'-� -' ---b_ BAR be tteade Fer insialling said lFwes Upgrade of lines will be paid by applicant. 15. Gas mains will be installed by . .4PP1AQ$Rt x . .. , • • 16. If streets shown on the plat arc claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. li. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold IIighway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18, There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceediu};s, the applicant will rifer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed decd for lots sllo%ving all restrictions, covenants, vtc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be 30Q,QQ0. as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . .. .. .. .. . . . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F" DATE ..Ontober.l........ .. .. ...... 19.84. BAYVIEW D . .... - (\Tame o A i t By . . . .. .. . .. . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .... . (Sig atu an Title) 0 I, Vice President 120la Boulevard;,P,Q,.ROx.3]...... . (Address) Mineola, New York 11501 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . .. .... . ..... .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . ... .. ss: Onthe ..... . .. . .. .. .. .. . day of. . . .... .. .. .... . ...... .... .... 19. .. . . .. before me personally came .•..... . . .. .. . . .... .. .... .. . . .... .. .. ... .. . . to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . . .. .. .. .. . executed the same. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .. .. . Notary Public .. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . N8SSA4.. . .. .... .... .. .. . ss: On the . . . .. . 1$t;. . . .. . day of . . 1??r. .. ., 19.$4.. ., before me personally came JEFFREY .D..FDRCH=1... . td hue known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . .. .. .. .. .. . resides at No. .120. Millmla.8Ri112'axd. .. .. .. .. . .. . ............ . Mineola.,. .New.York . .11541 . . . . that . .. .. . . . .he. . . . .. .. .. . . .. . is the . .. .. .. .. . Vic?.Pzesident. of . .. . . .. . . . . .. >3AYV7k�T.DZZEWPMENT. MPID.. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . ... .. ....... .. . the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that . . he. . . ..... knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. awl omt . . . . . he. . . . signed . .. . .his . . .. . name thereto by like order. (� MARGARET A.KLEIN Notary Publ mom"PLUM.Stas of Now York ll 001 edMS fooWC MY ai�aa4abn Expires March 330, 1 aL�/ SCILMDULE A ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Hamlet of Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, county of Suffolk, and State of New York, bounded and described as follows : Bounded on the North by Main Road (Route 25) and Long Island Railroad; Bounded on the West by land now or formerly of Reese ; Bounded on the South by Peconic Bay; and Bounded on the Fast by land now or formerly of Anesthesia Group, Inc. , Pasi_llico Construe_ion Co . , Inc . , and James Pasillico, less parcels previously colvand Oit by seller and their predecessor in title. . 0G1 2 1984 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for '(tentative) (-bra}) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town ' Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: Co tra t V dee of 1. The appucanf iW iiee owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . .... J3AYV7J`'41'-WWTQMEM,tr0$ia,, , ,$AG.F• PROPERTY . .... ........ .. .... .. ........ ........ . ........... . . ........ .. .. ... ... .. .... .. . . .. ........... . .. . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) t1je Cor�tdract Vendgr of 4. The landis he byAthe applicant under--dulls--re� .�^tea,—ir;. c .rfo^n. C sky ri^_s.'_ _ifiee _- €ollowa: Liber . ... . . . .. . . .. .... .. . . .. . Page . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . On . . . .. .. .. .. ....... . ... . ; Liber . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. ..... Page . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . On Liber . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . Page . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Liber . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .... . . . Page . . . .. . . .. .... . . . . . . .. . On . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. .... .. Liber . . . . . .. .. . . .... .. .. ..... Page . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . .VPS$.}C;, ,$�g�. ,, , _ , . . , -• _-.. - . _,-. whose . . are Charlotte Ja s P Sae Michael S. Sa e and or-ss dsstnbut�es. .. .. .. .... .......S: q�.. .. . . . . .. . . .3.<... . . .. .. .. ..... .4........ .... P lti7i< a.:C-..Sage... .. .... .. . . ................ .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .... .. . . . . . . .... . .. . . . . 5. The area of the land is . .. ..$3..117. .. .. . acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the (late hereof have been paid.C:x e--p4 • . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . ... . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . ... . 7. The land is encumbered by . .... .t)0.:. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... . ... . . . ... . mortgage (s) as—foiltAve-! (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. . . . . . . . . . PaGc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . in original amount of $. . . . . . . . . . . . . . unpaid amount $ held by . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . address . . . .. .. . . .. . . ... .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . .. .. Page in original amount of . . . .. . . . . . . . . . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held b . .... . . . . . . . . . address . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. (c) Nfortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. .. . . . . . . . Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . in, original amount of . . . . . . . . . . . .. . unpaid amount $. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held b ..... . . .. . . .... .... .. . address . .. . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . .. .... . . . .. 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except Nrdt4'1=. T0qin easement, -beld.by.the.Incorporated.Viljage..4f.GzeenPnxt.. . . .. .. .. .. ....... ........... .. 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts A. RGS1d�S1t1d� .3DCiAgT}Cq�tLLXI� .. .Dish:ict_. . .... .. ..... . . . .. .. . . .. .... .. . . ... . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. ...... ..... ........... .. . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept :.. .. ... ... .. .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .... .. ............ . ... . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does) (-ekres-neS-) lie in a Water District or Nater Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . ..... ... ... . . F 13. Water mains will be laid by .exist,]rlg. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . ... ... . . . . .. . e::d--{n j---(no}�?�a rhe-w+la-been 2de-€or-in 34aa44ew-sstirl-+ rw: 14. F_lectric lines and standards will be installed byFzistiOg. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. . . -• -- -- .. .. . • •• • • •• •. .. ..... . . .. . . . . . anal-(a)- -(no)cbergt-wi{I-be made for ussta??ate-�ai� Iincs. Upgrade of lines will be paid by applicant. 15. Cas mains will be installed by . applica.Pt. ,i€. r�uired. a_rd---(a) - (no)- -charge wM Le made for installing- --ii�n; , 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold IIighway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing snaps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 30. In the course of these procecdintis, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec. 333 of the Peal Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of propo=_ed decd for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, rte Annex Scl.cdule •'D•' ' 7.2. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improv.ements will be $.300.011 as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . .... .. .. .. . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F" DATE . .Or-tobez .1.. .. .. .. . . .. . . . ... 19.84 t BAYVIEW D PILI .. . . ..... ..... . ( Tame o A t t l By . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . ... .. .. . ... . . . (Sig atu an Title) ORCI I, Vice President 120 :n laBoulevard;- P,Q,, B 3-1..... . (Address) Mineola, New York 11501 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. ss: On the . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . day of. . . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. 19. . . . . ., before ine personally came Cr . .. . . _„ . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .... . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . to me kno%%n to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . . . . .. . . . . . executed tl:e same. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . Notary Public - STATF_ OF NE\V YORK, COUNTY OF . . NASSAU . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . ss: On the . . . . . . ).str- - . . . . day of . .moto r. . . ., 19.84. . ., before me personally came JEFFREY .D..F.0Mi1'f LI.. . . to' hue known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . . . .. . . . . .. . resides at No. JN. MiPP-QIa.B0QTQYA0. .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . .. . .. .. .. . Nlineola,. .Now. York— .115D1 . . . . that . . . . . . . . .b2. . . . .. .. . . . . .. . is the . .. . . .. .. . Vice- Pr S d4Dt. of . . . . . . . . . . . . . J3AYVTIW-DI,VZWPMGN'P. SOki,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . the corporation describer) in and which executed the foregoing instrument ; that . . he. . .. .. . knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. ;rid illat . . . . . hQ. . . . signed . . . . .his . . . . . name thereto b)- like order. . . . . . ( :""��'?✓ � ( cam .... . ... . MARGARET A- KLEIN Notary PublLb' G:$YARY PUBLIC, State of New York VVVV No. 52-4766332 Cu Mfied in Suffolk County I: COmmission Expires March 30, 1 SCRE,DULE A ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Hamlet of Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and State of New York, bounded and described as follows ; Bounded on the North by Main Road (Route 25) and Long Island Railroad; Bounded on the West by land now or formerly of Reese ; Bounded on the .South by Peconic Bay; and Boanded on the East by land now or formerly of Anesthesia Group, Inc. , Pasi_ilico Construction Co. , Tne . , and James Pasillico, less parcels urevio�asly cOlvaVd out by seller and their predecessor in title . M r �r �s n T , o so n Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 September 11 , 1984 Mr. Jeffrey Forchelli Attorney at Law 120 Mineola Blvd P.O. Box 31 Mineola, NY 11501 Re: Cluster subdivision Sage Property Dear Mr. Forchelli: Please let this confirm the request of the Planning Board, Monday, September 10, 1984 . Prior to any further action the Board requests that the enclosed Long Environmental Assessment Form be filled out and submitted. The Board will make a field inspection of the property. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our offfice. Very truly yours , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN --SOU`HOLD TOWNLLA�NNNNING (yBBOARD -,�� Diane��11MF- huly ze Sf! arA enc . �y 1 S A� i k � r Lc 1. C a- � � - 1984 D'AMATO, FORCHELLI, LIBERT, SCHWARTZ, MINEO 8 WEINSTEIN COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINFOLA BOULEVARD P. O. BOX 31 MINEOLA, NEW YORK 11501 (516) 248-1700 (516)742-1400 ARMAND P. D'AMA TO JAMES W. PARES JEFFREY D. FORCHELL.I OF COUNSEL JACK L. LIBERT DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ October 1, 1984 PETER R. MINED KENNETH J.WEINSTEIN THOMAS J. DUNCAN RICHARD C GOLDBERG STEPHEN GUAKNFRI PETER ALPERT Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Ms. Diane M. Schultze Secretary RE: Application of Bayview Development Corp. Premises: Sage Property Southold, New York Dear Diane: In connection with the above, I enclose herewith the applica- tion for approval of plat in duplicate. Also enclosed please find our check in the su of $465. 00 which represents the application fee. Very truly you s, J FF Y D F R HEL I JDF/js Enclosures (3) 6. Approximate percentace of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10%100p1 S; 10-I5; 4; 15.' or . greater 1. Is project contigueusXto, or contain a building or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? _Yes _No 8. What is the depth to the water table? —10 feet 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? X Yes _. No 10. Does project site contaip_any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or end2ncered - Yes X No, according to - Identify each species 11. Are there any ique or unusual land forts he roi.e t situ (i.e. cliffs, dunes other geological formaticns - Yes No. -(Describe Tstanc� to 'be dedicated for natural use 12. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - Yes F No. - - 13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to .the community? - , Yes X No - - - 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: - - a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary Southold Bap 15. Lakes, Ponds, 'Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: _ a. Name b. Size (in acres) 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 114 mile radius of the pro'ect (e.g. single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). Commercial i:. Residential B. PROZECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) - a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 83 acres. b. Project acreage developed: 40 acres initially; 43 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped all aregs required under cluster developrent d. Length of project, in miles: _1 (if appropriate) — - e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square fcot- age developed acreage f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 60 ; proposed 60 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 12 (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One'FamiIy Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial 31 Ultinate 31 i. if: Orientation Neighborioad-City-Regional Estimated Employment _ Coar;erci al Industrial J- Total height of tallest proposed structure ** feet. **as Per zoning ordinance. w .. rOWN2 OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT — PART I PROJECT INFOMiLATION y0T This dacu.Tanc is de5icned to assist in deter-tntig '.net. er tae action pro;oseo Tay nave a -ienificant afraci on the envircnment. Please complete tae entire lata Sheec. Ans'+ers to t`esa ;uestions 4111 ae conslaerld as part of `,ie application for acoroval and may be subjec= to furtner verrficacion and public review. Provide any aaaiv ortal information you believe will be neeced to cimoleca ?ARTS 2 and 3. t is axce^_ed -.net Comaletion of tae EAF will :3e dependent on informacton currently available oral gill not 'nvolve sew S=14,es, rasadrtn or investigation. I; tnfo r..piton recuiring such aaditional +arx is.-unava(;acle, so indicate and soecify iaen instance. • ';ArF .7F PGCJECT: -_-.. ._ •U�E IMO .ACCRESS JF .WF? (rf Oif?erenc) Bayview Development Corgi . CFAPJ/J'1TE SAGE, VIl rAEL•SAGE, JMIFS SAGE and PATRICIA SAGE Sage Estates (Name) (No #) Sage Boulevard A001ESS a70 7IWtE OF APOI_trspT: ,Street: Bayview Development Corp. . Creenport, New York 11944 c/o Jeffrey D. Forchelli, Fsq. P �•, l5 ca ca) t.ip) :Iaea1 P. U. BOX .' 120• Mineola-Boulevard. 3USSaE25 ?F.CNE. Lrze Mineola, New York _T15tY1 n, _T! IF oo Applicant seeks to subdivide �_c°"�-: � OJ EC': (orier"ly describe type of Project or action) the subject premises into 31 separate building sites, 19 of which shallbe in a, present subdivision and 12 of which shall be in a future subdivision. (PLEASd COMPLEE'S EACH QUESTION - Indicate I.A. if not aoclicaole) A. SI-= :ESC?IPT.O,I ,.._.,. - _,. . ..- . . •: _:::r'(' _. (Physical sacztn; of overall project, both develacec and ;ndevelcoed areas) 1. General cnarac=er of tae land: Generaily unirorn slope X Generally =even and roiling or irregular :. Pr-sant 'and ase: Urban [ndusirial Cor=ercial Suournan _, dural 'rarest riculture _• OGnergl Existzug Fes'dent ia=.hares, J. Total ac-eace o' project srea.�M.11'ju.•s(APPAOXIP.°ATES) Approximate acreage: Presently After Comolatian Presently After Ccmoiet,on we adcw or 3risnland 24 aures 24 acres '..lacer Suraci :,na 11 ecris �l pins Forest 35 ac--s so is Unveceta cad ;^cs, eer:n or fill; -cr-s _acr-s ' 3ar Cuicaral - acr-s _ __ icaCs, 3uild`'as ;declare f­snwata^ or ant 1:719r lav: 1 rlcai as•3er 5 r� iU rr'Cas __ - 's i�icr^ S 't, '_5 :r =._._. ; ?cres _r_. ^._er . :nei_ata -yvei -cres sand, loam and clay mixture a, k " e hat is or= cm:nant soil typs) on 3roi,C_ i. a. Are t.._. e ieCr^CX putLrapdings :n 3rajec. 1. :_==? _ Jas X 'la b. 'what is czot' :a tedr=CX' N/A r- pet) . 3/1!73 t 40 • r 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? Yes X No b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? _Yes X. No c. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes, Ho) (Type) (Date) (Date) City, Town, Village Board YFS Cluster Development City, Town, Villace Planning Board YF'b'- 1t15�yision City, Town, Zoning Board � City. County Health Department YES— , an1 2.rt y _ Other local agencies _ Other regional agencies State Agencies - a Federal Agencies C. INFOR,WATI0%AL DETAILS Attach any additional informati as me be needed to cl fy your p oject. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associ ted wit pro al, ple se cuss sufh ' pacti and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or a id t PREPARER'S SIDIIATURE: TITLE: REP SESENTI: *7I 9 DFVELpPP c:OFP. DATE: 'sKptkber 17, 1984 1 f, 2. How much natural material (i.e. rack, earth, etc.) will be rexavn_d from the site - - tons .� cubic yards 3. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site - --acres, 4• will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this protect? Yes X Na S. Are there any plans for re-vagetation to replace that removed during construction? a Yes —_No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipated 2 No. - - b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 10 month Sear (including demolition) e. Approximate completion data final phase 10 conth 87 Year. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent an subsequent phases? Yes No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? _Yes •" No 4. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10 after project is complete G - 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? yYes No. If yes, explain- Existing water service line from main to houses. 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? }_Yes No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial , etc.) sewage in existing cesspools e. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged ^I/-A 13. Will surface area of existing lakes pends, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? _Yes . No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 1C0 year flood plain? ti Yes No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? __Yes No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? ° Yes No c. If yes, give name: private sanitation : location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal cyst=_m or into a sanitary landfill? !Yes Na 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes X No „ 17. Will project routinely produce odors (mere than one hour per day)? Yes No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes — No 19. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Yes _No. If yes, indicate types) - 20. If water supply is fromwells indicate purging capacity gals/minute. V. Total anticipated water usageter day _ gals/day. V. Zoning: a. 'What is dominant 'zoning classification of site? Residential A _A� b. Current wecific zoning classification of site 2 Acre Residential c. Is prrposed use consistent with present Zoning? See F_elow _ d. If no, indicate_ desired zoning 11xisting cottages are nonconforming Applicant seeks to reduce nonconformity. s _3 h! D'AMATO, FORCHELLI, LIBERT, SCHWARTZ, MINED 9 WEINSTEIN COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P O BOX 31 MINEOLA, NEW YORK 11501 (516) 248-1700 (516)742-1400 ARMAND P. D'AMATO JAMES W. PARES JEFFREY D. FORCHELLI OF COUNSEL JACK I-. LIBERT' DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ PETER R MINED KENNETH J. WEINSTEIN September 17, 1984 THOMAS J. DUNCAN RICHARD C-GOLDBERG STEPHEN GUAR.NERI PETER ALPERT Planning Board Town of Southold Southold , New York 11971 Attention : Ns. Diane M. Schultze , Secretary RE : Cluster subdivision Sage property Dear Diane : As per your letter of September 11 , 1984 , I enclose herewith the completed long Environmental Assessment Form. Very tr ly your , / e e Forchelli JDF/br Enclosure iAUG f 71984 • D'AmTO, FORCHELLI, LIBERT, SCHWARTZ, MINED 8 WEINSTEIN COUNSELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P O. BOX 31 MINEOLA, NEW YORK 11501 (516) 248-1700 (516)742-1400 ARMAND P. D'AMATO JAMES W. PARES JEFFREY D. FORCHELLI OF COUNSEL JACK L. LIBERT DONALD JAY SCHWARTZ PETER R. MINEO August 15, 1984 KENNETH J.WEINSTEIN THOMAS J. DUNCAN RICHARD C GOLDBERG STEPHEN GUARNERI PETER ALPERT Planning Board Town of Southold Southold , New York 11971 Re: Application of Bayview Development Corp. Premises : Sage Property Southold, NY Dear Sirs : In connection with the above, I enclose herewith six copies of the proposed subdivision map, along with our check in the sum of $50 . 00 . I would appreciate if we could meet with the Board for a pre-submission conference. Thanking you in advance for you an icipated courtesy and cooperation, I remain V y my o s, r D. orchelli JDF: dbc Enclosures f TOWN OF. SOUTHOLD PF'O�ERTY REGARD CARD _ 7 8 -- -- - (;WNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB. LOT '.O41P __ Y /I'! ✓.�{//I µ_lm is_ FORMER OWNER N E r+ ACR. 3 6'7 S W TYPE OF BUILDING R_ SEAS. VL. FARM COMM, CB. MICS. Mkt. Value . LAND J IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS - O 0 y /I y�ro x s o ' �3 . 9 z 0,12.,�-7 .S'ao ' x 3 oc 3 `fsr 7,f-o 3 .r_ao A k-'O �IG2( 4-- 42.75 v�,3U� 7l 7d- 15't3f .. AGE ( I BUILDING CONDITION 3&Az � rrtdG„oI�IQ — �te�'>' SaeXe R ��S r NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE 8as,n ' _ _ 3 --r I •. . r �- T ,o.�L -qb tom- c FARM i Acre Value Per ----- Value "� 0•SO — 1_ Acre Ig�9(� n518 �5 �.� 1,ZakHer/2�pc1�s—n-8ma bon `Tillable FRONTAGE ON WATER ' 4 - L4s 11-1 z'n�d luu w,i�rye! V<'cadland FRONTAGE ON ROAD N.eadcwlancl I L DEPTH `-louse Plot i BULKHEAD Total DOCK i � N N D F D O N P s O O O F N P Ps7` p 00 O O - N P P O O p� PO O 00 so OJNA GENERAL N oOTES 0 a 0 PREF'ARED BY fltsox N xvN ¢ I POSLER 8 BARTLETT, I NL BY PHOTOGRAMMETR C METHODS. N` ep°[pD DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY MARCH 10,1984 2. GRID SHOWN HEREON IS IN THE NEW YORK STATE -f PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (LONG ISLAND ZONE). 3. VERTICAL, DATUM IS THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL N ' DATUM OF 1929 (MEAN SEA LEVEL, SANDY HOOK,N.J ) 0 SIT loo 0 100 200 300 LEGEND N'y\6000 - SCALE I"= 100' - PAVED ROAD " BASM CONTOUR INTERVAL' 2' - -- - UNPAVED ROAD - - - -- o --_- - TRAILS T I\ BUILDING -1O \J / / OBIVE pv T/.flPON pl Es COVE WOODED AREA INDIVIDUAL 10 CULVERT / WATERLINETREE Q - IDA / X X103 / /7 C - j CULVERT LOCATION MAP MARSH SCALE. "= GOOD s.6 now Or forme 195 x / / 1 / FENCE - b _~ � I 1X2 Jame Pos, lir / Xze - LIGHT POLE O� 4x X6 / �, - UTILITY POLE POLE 0 P 20 -- W.E36 00 zs / n w o I x � sz I 592 10 / /a Or formerly MANHOLE oMH POsil IiC RETAING WALL X7 zlCon ruction Co BULKHEAD Oro I 5.55° 2611 E PIER OR DOCK 7 2 5 X 0 x - / 614.12 12.1 / 00 . x - ___ __ X :/ / RAILROAD TRACKS 65 -}�- gbx4 X ZI I 9.2 _ _ _ _ MH 1 CONTOURS --20 10 N \ 7A I x ° MOH _ Z /.' SPOT ELEVATION x 6 9 - - _ . . T _ - - WATER ELEVATION WE 5.2 V. X X130 X139 j 2 X 50 I 0 \O 6.1 X 5 8 / l0 12 \1 �,, \ 10 7 .76 5.9 ///�/ 5.5 X5.1 10.8 \ I\ X9.9 _I5 I x x \ \� LOT NO. AREA (SO.FTJ LOT NO. AREA(50. FT.) at,I 25,000 14 9,000 29 X5.4 I I 90 212,800 15 9,000 71 X \ 0 3 11,250 16 10,500 2X - X S qn r 95 4 15,000 17 9,000 5�8 °35'/ esrhe X f _ 5 18,000 18 10,000 x 7 X 1.7 / < \ 9.91 10 . - O „F. /O ormBr/y 7 6 13,600 19 000 X , 5 ONE \\g ¢ \ 03 group 12,000 zres 3.0 zo { SECS\ON 14� 9.5 �\ x ' ' � " x / \ 9 10,500 10,500 X \ Xz1 AreO¢ /j�� \ FUTURE SECTION 0 9,000 \ \ Il 10,5002®X Acres Area = x 12 10,500 B3 13 10.500 X\6 \ 0 W.E. 6X 70 - 1-Zj a x ,I TO ^ X \ x11.1 KI \ \ I `11 fJ \ I I �O \ /O I \ 5 3 Q v Q +- PRO SED PAVEMENT �/� y6`38 ����� \\\ \ \ I I\83\1 �/ X 7 X 6x TO � x 1 r+ ' x � \\ T OURtS \\ \\I \ 2. so � V / I I 50 nN _ P \ /O \ /, -J \\\ \ A A C8 \\ 7X EXISTING BITUMINOUS P VEMENT 81 \ \. . . - . / o i \ \ - X ; Ae A II II � 1BX P 2 P \\ \I \ \\ 5.1 4 ° 1. SANO 3.0 3% r 0 566' Cre 30 �i I%9 5% - T \ r� / d 6 eo' To' o so O LLL.JJ�""LLL a .]o' 0 g X X / I !ice^v ��\\\ // -` P V \ so ]o 'er ios ' 4.2 II 12 13 14 15 1\ eOO �I('�J1 X 8 O9 10 4 16 . 1 I AREA=3 S F. , L % 3.8 - \ / / �\ P O \ \` O \\ © U 9 m G �z rs r�' X is i6 X N Is a za 2 zz z zw � BEACH AREA 7 2 DOCKS / / \ 8.3 \oo°od9 r \ 28 PooW\1 N Mov\bov�00% -. \ x SECTION 27 \�V B.4 83 F X \ A 6 4 x.X .. X P P P 8. s00 2X \\\ R X zx \ P� \\ So % a o \ N�\6 150 \ \\\ 76 X -- 2 \ 4.4 2.9 X S 5' AGre X7/ 3.0 ,13 %1I X6.5 x a t S 0 7.0 X 3.0 79 0 S.BI _ 2 x �y0 - X 845.33 E�`"I SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN SOUTHOL D 54 PREPARED FOR 4.6 X ` m eX e6 „ \_ BAYVIEW DEVELOPMENT CORP. - SAGE PROPERTY 0 3853 11.3 X _///.,\/ NOTE : - . \O S Jbd\v log de o � \\- TOTAL AREA = 83.117 t ACRES TOTAL NUMBER OF EXISTING REs1oENces = 31 VILLAGE OF GREENPORT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 5 10 I Co' I 1 X 11.7 'I ' ' - - TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS IN SECTION I = 19 - - / X 5Ufa' J underwater ter land - I I - _ ACRES TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS IN FUTURE SECTION= 12 n --'x 10.1 I I . RECEIVED BY Pwwrx°uunAfn:..a. zwnw INDICATES EXISTING RESIDENCE TO REMAIN »mrs svnw ra ao. ao•+cr OlD TOWN PIANNINC pp = ° '' " °X; ; 000 0�`v� - NOTE I. TOTAL AREA = 83.117 ACRES ENARO SSP Wi !Sz"e11L V Fovis c:;e¢ svl.r.. :,. -_r�wNns _ _ J 0 1X:w+D suev:vn:s n :D seat on ,� Z'� 4 2 w:O35FC su Sr"t ,:) e[eoNsiD[iED 'pTr Io of., v�..D 2. SUFF. CO. TAX MAPS - "" * puv,Msa Umic..+:a 1.1-.A InAu 1U. �ARp0N D1sn�° SECT 058 BL °5 LOT! ONLY TO a4 >ni°i+I.. M.na 5.0 - DM x6 X _ _ 4S {A- V'tfl' - S.AF MF[S w6 WJi 1. 11n6 _ 15 IPET%f D. ANO X15 LfX%.6 r°ME _ T. 73 �C ho 4589'' offs cent:n.°.G°P1:16-J s AGWCY RC 3ln V+SLIUi ';LI51.Xf0.f9q.A. - - rvu usmvrioNS oa swsXwev \ LOCKWOOD, KESSLER & BARTLETT. INC, YOUNG a YOUNG, RIVERHEAD, N.Y. _ ALDEN W. YOUNG, NA BE. . L.S.LIC. 5813 _ CONSI/LTINrr ENGINEERS NQ�ETN��� %� y0� HOWARD W. YOUNG,NAS. L5.-LIC,N0. 45893 -- JULY II , 1984 REVISED JULY 9 , 1984 -------- a oo 000 N N N T (n ( p p •- D N N p p rn p� lS O p0 s00 00 O 00 ' SO 00 0 - O 0 GENERAL NOTES: _ _ - - L MAP PREPARED BY LOCKWOOD,KESSLER a BARTLETT, INC _ BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS. e DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY MARCH 10,1984, 2. GRID SHOWN HEREON IS IN THE NEW YORK STATE a PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (LONG ISLAND ZONE) 3. VERTICAL DATUM IS THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 (MEAN SEA LEVEL, SANDY HOO K,N.J.) 00 .. 100 0 100 200 300 LEGEND SCALE I"= 100' CONTOUR INTERVAL 2' PAVED ROAp -�10 / / \ UNPAVED ROAD - - - -- TRAILS ---- -- /n/ /•/ \ BUILDING to a 10 WOODED AREA x /x1o.3 / / INDIVIDUAL TREE / now or merl WATERLINE� / - X.s // James stili CULVERT ��j x 49 x z.B � MARSH / WETLANDS �J1.� _ x x FENCE N 0 20S 42 f 10 LIGHT POLE O� 00 I I X - UTILITY POLE o POLE 0 s.z v 2.9 now r for - _ - - � „w_ < rly Fbsilli ° `. pMH 0 a / Structio MANHOLE C� Ci I S.55° 'z6" E_ ` 1X7 .Q 12.1 n . Inc. - / II x ( X - - x _ Q z0 z z5 1X6 RETAING WALL '��V N3 500 6.sO I i e 12X� 5.7 - BULKHEAD /! I - 14.2 71 2 I I g% � ' - -, � X 12.1 � � PIER OR DOCK o ff RAILROAD TRACKS ��- O MH L- 10 0 _ CONTOURS -20 C� x 5..0 - - - 7SPOT ELEVATION X 6.9 x 61 x X 13.0 x 139 / I J I _ W£ 52 WATER ELEVATION 5.8 - � x 0 0 I 2e ` x'.a AC x51 °`� oye\ \\ x99 0 / .9 2 CONSTRU (GHWAY 0 SOUTHOLD \ / �` aYa + TOW ECIFLCATION- zs r °W x / - T 1 9.O10D Or for t I �I . - / l x ��"wl! S.F_ 81 .• jam. ' erlY 11 .Ja 2.5 / I.T Wb , k r/ ♦ � 5.8� °3 95 esfh •F � 'v i S. 'Qry 7.0 F. Cr P \ \ x7.1 �- x /��= -\\ t x a.I ✓x ¢ 210 \�\ L, I' 67 io ad \ ' = 76000 SF. I� 53000 S.F.- / / 1 FOR OV IN g� E,cN�INE EASEMENT FOR OVE HEAD UTILITIES \1 \ 74 we 04 ' i �\eb \ Ig 30 max___ 3T0' AIIN 340 PWILL BE AVEMENT NT WBEAR OVED 0.3 __ \ POND '-\= s ` �J T )D \ � \\ \\ �1 \\ \\ S. . /?� /25 x a 1 1900 7.0 7 4r/ zl 64 \ / d \\ \ -`�o-\ \X B.4�w /5 a u z 1 \ \ '� O O 3.0 2, x �X °'-" � z P nlf°r\eK�2°k � \ a.l i \\ } 9 � 54000 3.a 6 x _ Acre _ 3.° 1. 56 a4k2I 5 I I I 1 1 x Areo - Q - S 1 S.F.'- 1, Z X 3.8 2.7 \\\ x FLOATING DOCK � a , s } �_ O J e,3 ILJI a.2 a4 5 BOAT SLIPS ® x a If \\and( p \ ro x W/ RAMP 8 FIXED FLOAT DOC& $ ( ,3w \ \ B OAT B IN PLATFORM er\1 e�ne< 18 ATSLIPx a z25`+ P P P P hnNM / s \ / F O l°rmo��ti / RAMP 8 FIXED B8 ��� PLATFORM x 9p z P \ x y>2• \\\ t ��� GRAS - no°�d P - \ + \ 000 $' ERCP 5g\ } e� \ \4� 7 x ,w \st0 \\• BUILDING ENVELOPE ALL BUILDINGS IN VIOLATION OF I 2x \\ PREP (TYPICAL) THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE WILL BUILDING ENVELOPE DOCKS ON EAST SID F L DON BE REMOVED N3\r WILL BE REMO2.9 a \ 76 44 ` 3.0 \ - a , O 5.9 2.z y 3.0 5 J ix t O M.N. 9 $.f. g45 Charlotte now orf Q �I Y f 4.6 1Td ' / $ 5.X B% H -, - SOUTHOLD [J ry N SET BIAN IME � \ - W S.C.TAXDESIGNATIONI 10 -53- 5- 12.3 CLUSTER NCEPT = SKETCH PLAN Nx. N.1 °2? 34 „ $0 1 ores \\ \ / c\�r •cQ�ey\v - - - - - ' cKoyy`c' SITE DATA BREEZEY SHORES to b IQyS\o y e D. 6 1L3 i ' / e �-� 0° TOTAL AREA = 83. 118 AC. - _ _ AT GREENPORT - / 55 _ S° f' to \\ - ��� ° CLUSTER CALCULATION UNDER WATER = 11. 551 O IDA Uff, ° I I x 11.7 41 46, ISLAND = 1. 566 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD NET AREA• 80% = 80000= LOT YIELD WETLANDS = 16.8 SUFFOLK COUNTY NY 53.201 • 43560. 0.80= 80000 23 NET UPLAND AREA = 53.201 AC.:'- ' 'x 10.1 I OWN 00 - BAYVIEW DEVELOPMENT CORP. c/o OAMATO ,FORCHELLI( LIBERT,SCH RTZ d MINED , ESQS. - - /O = POB 31 / 120 MINEOLA BLVD. - �pFtPON MINEOLA. N.Y. 11501 7.3 RECEIVED BY - 1z6 x - - - - SC�ihlh ) rth(IIlU�6 NO NOV 1 9 1985 OnrE - -1 - L©CKWOOD, KESSLER & BAMETT, INC. YOUNG IN YOUNG ' - - _ -CONSULTING ENGINEERS- - SYOSSET,NEW YORK i 3, 1965 ALLDENSW.YOUNG, N.Y.S.ANDER 9E.8 LSADLIG. NO.12845 O 000 1- - --- -__- "- --------- -- - ----- - --- ----- yyOO SACALE OCT 100' HOWARD W.YOUNG,N.YS. LS LIC. NO.45893 N3\y yp0 Ny\y 000 _ N3\A y0 - �.�\A N'�\ NW. 83 - 1201 - L. K S. 4022, 4/64 a ° ° 0 YP 8 qac SSpN K WIN ¢° , P pGENERAL NOTES Br'/EG 0 I MAP PREPARED BY LOCKWOOD,KESSLER R BARTLETT, INC BY PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS DATE OF PHOTOGRAPHY MARCH 10, 1984 2 GRID SHOWN HEREON IS IN THE NEW YORK STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (LONG ISLAND ZONE). b\Is 3. VERTICAL DATUM IS THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL s DATUM OF 1929 (MEAN SEA LEVEL, SANDY HOOK,N J ) N y SITE ` a 100 0 100 200 300 / 0 rc BASIN" LEGEND SCALE 1"= 100' a CONTOUR INTERVAL : 2 '1 / PAVED ROAD 10 UNPAVED ROAD T/.PPOx OPIVE �' P TRAILS / 10.4 10 / 4 ES COVE X1o.3 / / BUILDING / a z'6 now or foWOODED AREA rme 19s / �✓� 13.2 Nome // •' / / LOCATION MAP INDIVIDUAL TREE x -- - - - e Pos" lic / X26 - WATERLINE - . . _ N _ 49 / /� SCALE "=600' x /�X / / - CULVERT �-... 36 10 MARSH ° WE$6 - - - X - ' x / - FENCE -x ❑ fio ti I I 29 ja n w LIGHT POLE o-` 0 OQ Or I UTILITY POLE I � S55° Posillic formerly XI-� - : X26" E. POLE - o AT � I 70 X 1X7 1XICon ruction C 500 Q• I I g 5 7 2.5 136 0' • l \ \ 6X5 I 2X - MANHOLE OMH N 7X -V� I i 9X /346,Z5 _ RETAING WALL -p - X 12.1 BULKHEAD 54 MH x / m / ° 78H - % j / PIER OR DOCK X _ /: RAILROAD TRACKS ---�-- ° J I x50 I• 6I x X130 x j 13.9 CONTOURS IO \0 _ / -20 58 � SPOT ELEVATION x6-9 7 WATER ELEVATION WE 52 28 �'. X2.4 X5.1 6 12 151 % X \9.9 .• \ \ 2.8 X 71 90 °sW X 5.4 25,000 ' 11 2(5 ONE X1.7 /�R=/26./ \\� OR, / LOT NO AREA (50 FTI LOT NO AREA(SO FT.) \ SEC(10N / 58 s or / 14 9.000 es ° 6 70 a �' 8 i s 9.X IO % °3S, gnesr 95 2 12,200 15 9000 prep° 70 95 II 4 -0 /o ^ he . X f 3 11,200 16 10,500 X 5827. 9.5 � 118,000 18 10,000 X3 f /O OfinBr/ - 4 15.000 17 9.000 �/ 6.7 _ �� ��\ \ CrOSA Y 6 13.600 19 13.000 X /� \ o u, 7 12,000 = 5 39 .6 914 E" 2B/./G' O FUTURE SECTION 10,500 L 9 - m 4 Area = Acres \ \ 10, 500 L/ x to 9,000/ � 1 10,500 a % 8 \ 1 °°° 6 g 8.2 \ \ \ 2 10,500 10 \ � � 41�\ aX \ 13 10,500 W. " 10.7 x N. � \ 1 2 `��` � 6 fi � \ 7a p ;1 7C3 O ? \ 6.X7.0 (J © /PRO 19E1) PAVEMENT P \`� \ SE`unts \\ \ \ 111 SEDT / 99 Q CO 3.X 2 1X9 5.9 -).e X - \\ /O \� L-� X \ A A 0 I\ 3�� 7 1 EL m 5a 8.% �� B4 \';r /SS9 \ X /9 P x EXISTINe BITUMINOUS P VEMENT - � el \ V � \ 2/ . �5. .$S' 59o.Ho' ❑ - ��: - der er� X5 I 0 60 Z drp IIl �.JI Irf"0SII I� GIO PTo i�-1 �T4RSAND 3Xp X F 154ACreze 56 2.7 P 1 Area F X I \\ \ 4.2 �' / \\ p Is Iv Ie ,� zI z{z zi z \ AREA'3 S.F. X 3.8 N I \ s' Is' \ l T ` s II 13 LLL'Alll Isl X \ ¢ D I 6 X P -�y za• IUB a I 8.3 m BEACH AREA - '�_ �_ 2 0 = IN SEMON --`�9_ Oro c ���. or to a oyloPd' B60.OG • P � � P P P � q�� '��N rF4 Po+' a�Tb x w, P xVELOPE O 2 PE l G G O V LO O /V.6Q`37¢z'W 1 \ \ PPOPOSEp BIIILO=NG EN f 2 , \ 7'x �NOE \\•56 _ �s °2727°!l�/ kJ. X \� \ ,21 Z \ Ep` /t/ 8O17O8�5° 0 220¢3 /°Oho N a°oa"'V,IV _ �L N�` � h• E \\ 5 X h - � J \ 4.428.56 ' \\ 7fi 'e 6 N zX \ X R- 3¢.90 \\\ 7s / g /V.�.9aB"oo"E. 3R/� u c \ Q N83 44b7E. 22 \ SEtf 2 / ® N4-5°28/3"E 2799 3.0 \ T =arJt ACTe �j/ 2 � . . . a x N (IJ � N 2855"IV /7B.s�j" 78 - 5.0 \ fL117o`2a58'N 3759' _ \\ 7.�0�x ® S E7- -W 29.58' 25 \ O X5.9 % y 30 79 X s a \Q X m.uN"R 1 nuMwn°n°rAs. OTT 36'26'28'E. 25 57' TO :«,s E .D Is n NuN us sN of g45 33 Q S. 7°04'S/'IL /09.75' puC'enol.'u,v r 1Np N`w laY 'ATE 46 �9°.! Or R411 5U?yry qpP N°r YNYIVG YS`•.Y •�'3"CLOP /✓G9°/T22°N 4093 �� � wEoss:c sw s•:.z., _ envcuEo +` NZ%5'32"E 316 ro o:A ,. .> r•c,1171 X Jq�.," ( /T�J 3aJ O U / �I O D Q 8)2 \ - / /y4b°i4'49'"W 6L2 GG.,. es 'g4 Sh \ \ ,/L 57`3G28/C! 5Z.D7' on.r To a:e ae s,.N roe ewoN n, - , o °2T - SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN ar'E"'1� "�CGI:I4Dn�° r° „ N.7 \ \ `m<comr.nnr, cov:cw.,.•:•u Ac.No nNr iuol:.c WC11L . lsr:c Fen(ou, /,Np "NON "ASANrE25 wps rvor rewnslFTuu PREPARED FOR TO ME A.SIcrn:s or rxs lenamG lNm. 10 , lon - \ 0. 3 11.3 ` � � / - / O5 SUbdiv Ile 10 \\ _X '�� o.l Co. x Self. I I % 11.7 B AY V I E W DEVELOPMENT CORP ra AaclrlaNAL INSrITUrIONS ,wNNi. TOTAL AREA = 83.1172 ACRES NOTE TOTAL NUMBER OF EXISTING RESIDENCES 31 _ SAGE PROPERTY X�TOLI underwater land - 11 .551 t S TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS IN SECTION 1 = 19 VI LLAGE OF GREENPORT, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 00 " \ / Island - 1 . t ACRES Jam_ � I l TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS IN FUTURE SECTION= 12 /o OR,VE INDICATES EXISTING RESIDENCE TO REMAIN PtE OF NF r`ENOTE: \ 7.3 1X6 \ % -'_ - 2. SUFF.L CO. A% MAP: 17 t ACRES OPOSED YARD SETBACKS y DIST-120 SECT O�_BL os LOT! FRONT - 25 - 3- TOTAL AREA SECTION "~I = 41592ACRE5 - • ONE SIDE -10 TOTAL SIDE YARD-25 ' FAR - 30 4N ° 45393 s LOTS LESS THAN 10 510E YARD Ep Id NO L SD5vLY0 " Oi 9 EAST SIpE LOT US' 510E LOT 1 EAST SIDE LOT ITEAST SI OE - -- LOT IB EAST 510E aea.. 5500 000 o LOCKWOOD, KESSLER & BARTLETT. INC. JAN. 21 I9a5 N O CONSULTING ENGINEERS SYOSSET. NEW YORK DEC 18, 1984 YOUNG 8 YOUNG, RIVERHEAD, NY. 0° NOV 12, 1984 ALDEN W YOUNG,N.Y.S. PE B L.S. LIC NO. 12845 L. K B.#4022, 4/84 JULY 11 , 1964 HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.YS. L.S LIC. NO. 45893 C� REVISEDJULY 9 , 1984 _ �.'uF`Sv - i t. .�.;"�' r-i "se„".h;�!y -�Tr'�'Z'` - -. ,a. �.-�«�r_ -.<2�x n. -f _a ..✓ ,t, - nr ,"� � _x a- _ < -, _ e -_, ', -, [_ r• . - :._s_ .._z a - _, rr ,- _ - `.sum *,�[',_- •. ,,.�- ,`,� _ ., _ -� . ,tea, ,.� . �� � �_. ��•_� ,a __ _ _ . -- __ _ 2 - ♦r - •} _ _ - _.., -. .. .. . _ - n _ . . - . -=b 3'rcn.=' „'.�{a- .�-'a ,"y".. •}j<s�" -,ex'_ _ _ _ _ _ ... WIN a 3� t . . .. 1. 4- ._. _ .�f -...___ 5 .. . .: - .- . ._ -. 'kms r w - e x �m r _ _ _ _ _ •. _ �_. ._ -� --.. _ _- _ •- _ -. . . ... ..-_ _ ,-,. :-: :: ::._:- p 't : =r ::-- ',e y _ _< a . .. _ _ .l - _ ' . . _. _. _ .• ..-.., - _ n ... _ _ _ -, _ .. _. .- � - h. _ _ _ _ _ _ -Qe f.� - 4a eUI�+II:-O¢430' }��FIONLL -zF�i ISLW)�sa x N S±�s h t� , n / a • 5 . .. ,_. -a _ r < -v F - 5._ _ - +�r. ., - o. .•• ,. ,:- . '< - :- -'o_ <._ ,: _ r :ili [FRGJN .... .r ._ _s •__-� .rte- . � _ , ._._ _. ...-- ., - _-- _ _,- ._ _ . � _ _.. - _-__ _ ._ .._ _ __ _ _ _ ____ _•- ___ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ - - � _ [-: _ -,vim.- ': , - _ .'- - -- - - - -- - - - - - - -� - - - - - - ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - Q , .49 v ",Goos.F p Vali 1�e I \ /00,000 95,Gb0 S.F P� DPp5�9 � 20pp 84,000,5 F_ - g5,00Q 5,F; cl -_ T1ROF089f3 = .r.,O' ROGa -- - 7� se.CrioN OAIE D � U LS1 OO s.F A �- \ J t2 SOUTHOLP BAY PREPA"v FOR 1 AYV1sW= Dav9LOF Afa -r coep. 546 =A�OP��TY �![! LdQF ;OF=.�M7 7 Na�1f E3F3©EtTk i -SEIPFOGIG CAU,VTY, V.Y. SCALE 40 OS7-)'FdND6Q 4VE, ,2NERyEt1D,NY- _ - - LLDEN W YOUNG, N.YS. PE. G LS, NO-128d5 t1OWd,et7 W. YOL C-, Al.Y5, L.S. A(O, 49$93 - ALBERTSON LANE e° c _ \ Or qo 3 _ MURRAY G S x .. - PLAINVIEW OR JACOBS JOSEPH a MARIE \ sABE eD°SPA ep REST \ q„ TIAL E BLVD KNpAK - - RESIDEN�1qLOUE, N.Y ' ,° Aes/nE,yr A(.As \ ASIR. R/DD(TO°A( rA e / R1GEIBLVDILION \ O0N °s/Ye l°xr/xnuAr°iA RESIDEN'ALOUE.NY. N, A / S4YyIEW REALTY DEVELOPMENT P.O. OBOX 65UDA CORP SAGE BOULEVARD POBOX 31 C/O JEFFREY D. FORCHELLI, E9p, 1 ce °pYE . RSEDEN 141- . 11944 O5, N.Y—. _ MINEOLA, N. 11501 483.84- ' m n LOCATION 600'MAP 4C.; 'm =O�Nf�L O I BUjf1104 O+r��PC s-82°I6-58"E / N5 X01 500, 300.00'I Uplapd I DOCKS Area = 8.625 t ac. 500' 0 501\,6 0 IIIb-JIr(-�r�I O G6 0 p5 p6N tl{,\�6 n I H— r BADE BUILDING ' OM' VK 6• IILIII 0.0. \p0.a OEPOOp0.0 f �` O vi . I 9°p0.�0. o �P0.0 56S a � c 6°OA 50�OOp P� n Underwater Land 1 2 G�6 0.<\ i Area =3.7 . MARINA RIN I 6�5\°0. �aC BUILDINGS 0. p0.`vE % I 1 p0.PON NPNN . X6\5 116 6CNP 0.y RL I STORAGE DUILDINO 6Na1 pati9 N S. SD9aaPROPOSED OPOSED 1 5 M-1 GENERAL MULTIPLE \ exp N0. RESIDENTIAL ZONING USE DISTRICT 3 OE 510.�N1 °v PEs\O MAP TO ACCOMPANY APPLICATION x61.01 0% 62- PREPARED �,/ FOR CHANGE IN ZONING USE DISTRICT Z\p5 NlQO3j4 eye \gra e„W Oi 569° \ PREPARED _ FOR \- 4\ge, OT7'AOES S 4 7 SOUTHPORT DEVELOPMENT ti \� Z BS° T1ELlNE a � /l \ 4eF,yS'� 4pPROk, NIGH I AT GREENPORT p0./\N m.W, e343 ?F N o WATER MARK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 6V4 ° p5`'OC\a f D - 100 ?PD\ PY pP0.0.N{. O `0.pPE5 9AA hoz Area 0. 12 ± ac. MAY 2411985 1a0�1 51 y \\ GE, 33w l 9° p0.N 1\P 500 F0.0?00.1'tNi� 6g\2631 °P�\°�N pflEEP1 �'P S SOUTHOLD BAY ' H IPC 7 TIE LINE APPROX. HIGH WATER MARK / r F OF NEN. Y 4 r�PpD W, Fo.C. ` 61 APPLICANT NOTE : 11 SOUTHPORT DEVELOPMENT I. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP NO. 1725 Hobart Road DIST 1000 SECT 57 BK 01 LOT 38.3 Southold, NY 11971 2 EXISTING MARINA USE IS TO REMAIN 3 EXISTING ZONING USEDISTRICT = "C" LIGHT INDUSTRIAL YOUNGB D,N.Y. 4. PROPOSED ZONING USE DISTRICT M-1 GENERAL MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ALDENW.YOUNG, . .S.PE.a L.S.LIC.NO.12845 5. TOTAL AREA= 12461 i ACRES HOWARD W.YOUNG,N.Y.S. L.S.LIC.NO.45093 rt 85-596