The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-52.-5-59.3 & 59.4 APPROVED BY PLANNING BOARD ToWN OF sOUTHOLD FINISHED GRADE TYPICAL P"'W,aGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEICAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPL Y WITH THE STANDARDS & REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEAL TH. SET OFF MAP '~" FOR ,~" , ANDREW C, ASSlDY & AT GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y. 1000 - 52 - 05 - 59.3 & 59.4 iF A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS HAS BEEN FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE WHICH AFFECTS LOTS IN THIS SUBDIVISION. LIBER 11631 PAGE 637 ZONING DISTRICTS' L,I. I & R 80 OWNER, ANDREW CASADY 1~5 ALBERTSON LANE GREENPOR~ ~ TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION FROM FiVE EASTERN TOWNS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP AREAS LOT I = LOT 2 = 4.5131Acres 58.0698 Acres TOTAL AREA= O~, 62.5829 Acres . Aj~O' G ./ ,2. : "= 100' Jan. 15, 1993 ~ Jan. 20, 1093 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY'THE PLANN~6 BOARD OF APPROVAL DA BY DATE CHAIRMAN PLANNING BOARD I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED / POND SITE KEY MAP Scale~ I"= 600' TEST BORING 14' LIC. NO. 49618 ~R~ -m~.. MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N,Y, 119TI PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 October 4, 1994 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Andrew Cassidy & Sons SCTM# I000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 3, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the SouLhold Town Planning Board authorize the Chai,,,~n to endorse the final surveys dated September 27, 1994. Conditional final approval was granted on August 22, 1994. All conditions have been fulfilled. Enclosed please find a copy of the map which was endorsed by the Chairman. The mylar maps, which were also endorsed by the Chairman, must be picked up at this office and filed in the office of the County Clerk. Any plat not so filed or recorded within sixty (60) days of the date of final approval, shall become null and void. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman enc. cc: Tax Assessors Building Department PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971 Fax (516) 765 -3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 23, 1994 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Andrew Cassidy & Sons SCTM# 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, August 22, 1994: The final public hearing, which was held at 7:50 p.m. was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Andrew Cassidy & Sons are the owners of the property known and designated as SCTM# 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 located on the west side of Main Rd. (NYS Rt. 25) and the south side of Albertson's Lane in Gmenport; and WHEREAS, this proposed set off is to set-off a 4.5131 acre parcel, located in the L.I. Zoning District, from an existing 62.5829 acm parcel located in the R-80 Zoning District and the L.I. Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on April 12, 1993; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on August 22, 1994; and Page 2 Pmposed m~orsubdN~n ~rAndmw Cass~y & Sons August22,1994 WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore, RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated August 3, 1993, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to fulfillment of the following conditions. All conditions must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution: 1. Submission of six (6) paper prints and two (2) mylara of the final subdivision. All maps must contain a valid stamp of Health Dept. approval and a notation that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed. The notation must include the Liber and Page Number of the recorded declaration. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Jim Monsell, Greenport Public Utilities Richard Caggiano, Village of Greenport 11631 tl? DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS Cassidy, Carole Cassidy and Andrew R. Cassidy, residing at 1815 '~/Albertson Lane, Greenport, New York, hereinafter called the DECLARANTS. WHEREAS, the Declarants are the owners in fee simple of a certain parcel of land situate at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of ~0~f~k'Di~t°~0~~ ~io~e~i2~n~kO~ t~tSuffolk County Tax approximately 62.5829 acres, being the sa~e pre~sC~i~ie~g ,~y the DECLARANTS by deed dated ~'~'~1 ~ )('~ and re~rded in ~the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on ~,,~ ~,1~ in Liber i~c Deeds at page ~1 and referred to here'inafter as the "premises" and WHEREAS, the Declarants intend to subdivide said premises for residential purposes and desire to subject said premises to certain conditions, covenants and restrictions in order to preserve the maximum open space, natural scenic beauty and natural vegetation and to prevent the overcrowding and to conserve the ground water resources of the Town of Southold, and WHEREAS, the Declarants have applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval to set off 4.5131 acres from 62.5829 acres, THIS INDENTURE made this~Xday of ~ , 1993 by ANDREW F. CASSIDY AND THOMAS P. CASSIDY, as attorneys in fact for Herbert O. Cassidy, Joan Corie, Thomas P. Cassidy, Ellen P. Cassidy, Andrew F. NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarants do hereby declare that the aforementioned said premises and every portion thereof is hereby held and shall be conveyed subject to the conditions, covenants, and restrictions hereinafter set forth, and that every purchaser of said premises or any portion thereof, by the acceptance of a deed thereto, covenants and agrees that the premises shall be held subject to the covenants, conditions and restrictions hereinafter set forth. Ail stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of this subdivision or any of its lots shall be retained on the site by adequate drainage structures so that it will not flow into the right-of-way of Main Road (S.R. 25). 2 o A buffer area in compliances with the minimum standards of Section 100=213 of the Southold Town Code will be required prior to the issuance of any building permit for Lot Number 1. o A landscaped strip in. compliance with the minimum standards of Section 200-212 of the Southold Town Code will be required prior to the issuance of any building permit for Lot Number 1. 4 o There shall be no further subdivision of Lot Number 1 in perpetuity. Lot Number 2 shall not be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. o That all of the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained herein shall be construed as real covenants running with the land and shall continue and remain in full force and effect at all times as against the owner of the premises or any portion thereof in perpetuity. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be binding upon, inure to the benfit of and be enforceable by. the Declarant, their heirs, successors and assigns, and the Town of Southold and its successors and assigns, and the failure of any of the foregoing to enforce any of such covenants, conditions and restrictions shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be requird. The Declarants grant the continuing right in perpetuity to the Town of Southold or any of its designated representatives to inspect any areas designated open space, common areas or similar.nomenclature so as to insure continued compliance with the covenants, terms and provisions designated herein in regard to same and to insure that such covenants, terms and provisions have not been violated. The Declarants grant the continuing right in perpetuity to the Town of Southold or any of its designated representatives to enforce the conditions and restrictions of the covenants as they relate to the open space, common area or nomenclature and to take any legal action it deems necessary to enforce the conditions and restrictions of the covenants. These rights of inspection and enforcement shall be binding upon declarants, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors, assigns and transferees. STATE OF NEW YORK) .ss: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) THOMAS P. CASSIDY ~/ On this ~q day of fY%~ , 1993, before me personally came Andrew F. Cassidy and Thomas P. Cassidy, to me known to be the individuals described herein and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed same. NOTARY PUBLIC ARLENE J. TUTHILL NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New Yor No. 4856450 - ~k County Commission Expires, Apd114, 199q PHONE:852--2000 SUFFOLK COUNTY CLI=IqK'S OFFICE Edwar~ p. Romazne, COUNTY CLERK Town of Southold Assessor ~,/Town of Southold Planning Board Chief Deputy County Treasurer To Whom This May Concern: The Subdivision Map Of: Filed Number, qf88 ~,~tr~t ~er, Township, Southold - Owner: Very truly yours, County Clerk Map Departmenl No. 49 SET OFF THI5 PROPO5AL I5 TO 5ET OFF A "/.~l~l ACRE PARCE,L FROM AN EXISTING g~'~'~_ ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON -'rt,_ ~.~ ~.;& ~ ~,~ ~',~ r'~ ~c.~+~ ,~.~ ~,~ -)~ Complete application received Application reviewed at work session Applicant advised of necessary revisions Revised sub mission received Sketch plan approval -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination Sent to Fire Commissioner Receipt of firewell location Notification to applicant to include on final map Sent to County Planning Commission Receipt of County Report Review of SCPC report Draft Covenants and Restrictions received Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval Final Public Hearing Approval of set off -with conditions Endorsement of set off ~ {a~O.~) ..................................... ,o~Lh 19 d~-greea 03 m/nu~ea 50 ~econd& we~C. 202.92 ~eet; ~n~ng chance ' ~eg~ee~ 42 ~gr'vea 46 l,:~ce[ ea~c, 3~6.5~ :eec~ runnLng thence n~ O0 ~,~T teut~ runnt~g thence aou~h :1 degrees 49 m~nu~e~ east, 130.0~ east, ~1. 5 fee~z tun:~in~ thence ~outh aS de~z'oea 47 n~h~t~ jher~w~h. ' . ' ' ' : I ~ elf siae~ lit;o nvoJ · . Prepared by Project Spo~ F' NOTICE: This document is d ed to ~ss~st in determining whether ,he act,on ~osed on ~he environment Pleas~ complete the enbre form, Psrts A through E Answer~hese:qumt,gn~ as p~rt of the ~p~ic~tion for approval and m~y be sub/eot to further verii cabOn a new ~tudie~, research or investigation If intormation requiring such ~ddidonal . each instance. spec ~A~ oF Acno~ ~: .... ~*~o~~o~so~ '" =- ~- '- ,$uf~l~ ..... . . . _c, o Thomas Cas~ic~v < _.) '£O setoff Li~;:t ~ndustrial' zone~ d~:z~rict line, frorl ren~ainin~ 5~ property, 2o!io',./ing zoning Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A.' if not applicable A. Site Description Physical serf;ag of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. " 1. Presen~ land use: [2]Urban E]lndustria/ r-lCommerc~at E]Resident~al (suburban) ~Rura/(non-farm) nForest ~Agriculture ClOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 6 ~. ~l ~ acres APPROX;~TE ACRfAGE ~eadow or Bt6shlahd fNomn~ric~ltural) ~0 'PRESENTLY AFTER COMPEETION Forested acres ~ A~ricukural (includes Orchards, cropland, pasture, e~c.) ~ ~0 acres 30 *WeflaM ~freshwa~er or ~ida~ ~s per A~ficles 74, 25 of EC~] 1 o ---- ~ acres Water Surface Area - - _ acres --. l~ acres Unvege~ated Cgock, earth or fill) - t~ acres ~ .5 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces - acres ~ acres Other (Indicate type)~ acres ~ acres 3. What is ~redominant soll type(s~ on project site? ~o~oL~, [O~m, bahk~n a. So~l drainage: ~Well drained TO % of ~te ~,~loderately well drained _2~ ~Poorlydrained_ 10 ~ % of site - % of site b. ~ any agricultural l~nd is h~voJved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS [and Classification System~ __ _ acres. ~$ee 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcropp ngs on project site? ~Yes ~No ~ a. What is depth to bedrock~ _ ~ 3~ ¥¥ifl d~sr(~rbed ,~reas be reda,fled;' rmYes a. ~t yes, for wh;~ in , rpose is the site being reclaimed~l ' b. Will topsoil be stockpiled ~or reclamadon~ ~Yes c- Will upper subsod be stockpiled for reclamation¢ E3Yes ~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, g?ound covers) will be removed from site? _ n acres, 5. Will any mature forest 'over I00 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project[ F~No · 6. If single phase project; Anticipated period of construction ~ 7. If multi-phased: ' · , a. Total number of phases anticipated _ (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate Completion date of final phase ,,, d. I$ phase 1 functionally dependent on ~ubsequent phases? 8. Will blasting Occur during construption~ F'lyes r-lNg 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 90 Number of jobs eliminated by this project ;, ll. Wi)! pro)ecl require relocation of any projects or facilities? months, (including demolition). month year, lincluding demolition) month _ year. E3Yes ~]No ; after project is complete ~. fi'lyes IF;lNg If yes, explain 12 Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? fi'lYes ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b, Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? F~Yes ~N0 Type 14 Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal~ Explain 15. Is 'project or any pordon of proiect located in ~ 100 year flood plain~ ~Yes E]Yes ~No 16 Will the project generate solid waste* 'E3Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month _ tons b. If yes, will an e×~sting solid waste fac'ility be used? E3Yes c If ye~, give name _ ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain EIYes l~No 17. Will the proiect involve· the disposal of solid waste? ~Yes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ,., b, If YeSi what ~s the anticipated ~ite life? years, 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticidest E3Yes ~No tons/month. 19. Will project routinely produce odor~ (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes l~No 20. Wig[ Project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? I-lyes 21 Will project lesuJt in an increase in energy use? ~Yes i~No If yes , indicate type(:;) ...... 22. If water suppty is from 'wells, indicate pumping capaoty ~ gallons/minute 23. Total anticipated water u~age pet day ~ gallon~/day. 24 Doe~ project involve Local, State or Federal ~unding? ~Ye~ ~No If Yes, explain .. ~No 4 6. IS prolec{ Substantially conti , or centare a building, site, or di~'c£,~.,~ted on [he State or the 'National Registers of Historic Places? L~Yes ~'7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? '~.9 (in feet} 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~Yes ~No 1~. O0 hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportuniUes pre~enUy exist In the prolec~ area? ~Yes ~No il, Does project si~e contain any spec,es of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ~Yes ~No According to ~ ~n ~ ~mDti~n ~d ldentif~ each 12. Are the~e any umque or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)' ~No Describe 13. Is the Proiect ske presently: used 'by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? If yes, explain 74, Does the present site include scemc views known to be important'to the community? ['-IYes ~No 15. Streams within or contiguous' to ptoiect area: .,, krRhamom~ue Pond a, Name of Stream and name of R~ver tO which it is ~ributary bIill Creek C 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name .. b. Size (In acres) 1 '~ 17. Is the site served by ex~sting public utilitles? -'~Yes ~No a,~ If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allo,,-, connection? ~Yes r-INo b} It Yes, w~ll improvements be necessary to allow connec~on~ ~Yes ~No 18. Is the site located in an agucuJtural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Market~ Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~Yes ~No 19 Is the si~e located in or substantia[ly contiguous to a Critical ~nwtonmentaJ Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes ~No gnkno,>]n 20.. Has the ~i:e ever been used for the disposal of ~olid et hazardous wastes? ~Yes ~o B. Project Description " 1, ?hys~ca! dimensJo ~s and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned Or controlled by project sponsor 69 .:~ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: . 4 . 5 _ acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 5~ . ~ acres, d, Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ._ ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project]? h. If resldenhaJ: Number and type of housing unit.s: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium lni6all¥ C i, jJtimately i. Oimensions {m feet) of larges! proposed structure ~ height; __ , ,. width; length. j Linear feet Of frontat, e along a public ',hotoughfaro project will Occupy:{s? 5~9ft. PART 1--PROJECT !NFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor ~ NOTICE: This document is desig.~ed to assist in determining wh,:~her the action on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E Afiswe/ as part of the apphcation for approval and may be sublect .~o fLit:her venilcahon m information.you believe w/Il be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information new studies, research or investigation if information requiring such .~dd~tional wot . each instance, may have a sight ,~hese£qu~stlon~l bH~~ Haered,7 SOUTHOLO TOWN, ,, :urren~?~N~l~ will no1 ~nvoJve effect NAME OF A~ION LOCATION OF A~ION (Include S~ree~ A00ress. Mumcipaht) and C0umy) 1459 ADDRESS ~p LOVe c~w~o t8U$1N :.$S TELE~:'HONE ADDRESS West Hill ~n~3 Sor. s c/o Thoma.~; Ca.~sic~v CITY/PO TO setoff~1.~' '"';:t Industrial zon~,~ ~_rooer~y, dLs~rict line, fron ren~ainzn~ STATE j ZIP CODE :;'5. I ]. !97 ]_ following zoning Please Complete Each Question- Indicate N.A.' if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas 1 Present land use: ~Urban Dlndustrial nForest l~A§riculture 2, Total acreage of pro;eot area: ~ ?, ~ ~ acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushla~d (Non:a~ricuhural) A~ricukural (~ncludes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) *Wedand (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ~CL) Water Surface Area Unvecelated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site~ ~c~so~, F-1Commeroal ~Other E3Resldential (suburban) ~Rural (non-farm) PRI:$ENTLY AFTER COMPLETION 90 acres ~ acres '30 acres 30 acres 1 ~ acres 1 ? acres .5 acres .5 acres bankr~ a Soil drainaCe: E3Well drained 70 % of ~ite C~Moderately well drained 26, % of sire E]Pootly drained 1-0 % o¢ site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group '~ th,ough 4 of the NYSe_- Land Classification System~ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). ~. 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~]Yes ~'~No a. What is depth tO bedrock? Q (in feet) 2 [] i'5% or grea~/~, % 6, Is prolec~ substantially contig or contain a building, site, or district?~l~ted on the State Registers Of Historic P~ce? ~Yes ~No ~7. Is pro,eot substantially contiguou~ t0 a site listed on the Registe~ of National Natural Landmarks/ 8 Wh~t is the depth of the water t~b~e? ~ ".,~ ~ ~in, fee~) 9. Is s~te Ioc~ed over a primary, principal, or ~ole ~outce aquifer? gYes ~No 10. Oo hunbng, fishing or shel~ fishing opportunities presently exist m the prelect a~ea? ~Yes ~No 11. Does p~oject site contain a~y spec.es el plont or animal life that is identified as threa;ened or endangered~ ~Yes ~No According to u?~n ~.~rm~ti~ n~d bel~ identify each species ~2. Ate ~he~e an~ unique or unusual land forms on the pto~ect si~e~ (i,e,~ cliffs, du~eS, other ~eo]o~lcai formations} ~Ye~ ~No Describe or the National ~]Yes is the proiect ~;te presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? .rqYes {~No I~ yes, explain DOe~, the ptesen~ si~e include scemc view~ known to be important to the community? ~Yes ~No Streams within or contiguou~ [o project area:, ~rshamom~ue Po~d a. Name of Stream and name of R~ver to which it is tributary ~11 ~reek C 16. Lakes, ponds, wedand a~ea~ within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b, Size (In acres) 1 9 17 [s the site served by exlstin~ pubtic utilities? :~]Yes ~No a] If Yes, does suffJcier:t capacity exist to allow connec:ion:~ [3~Yes ~No b) It Yes, wdl ~mprovements be necessar~ to allow connection~ ~Yes ~No 18, Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and ~arkets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 3()3 and 304? ~Yes ~No 19 Is the site located in or substantially contituous to a C~itical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 o{ the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617~ ~Yes ~No Unkno'..~ ' 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal oi ~olid or hazardous was(es? ~Yes ~qo C B. Project Description 1. Phys~ca! dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguOuS acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor __6,9 b. Project acreage to be developed: ,, ,4,5 acres initially; c. Protect acreage to remain undeveloped _. 5~ acres, d. Length of project, in miles' (If appropriate) e. [f the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f Number of off-street parking spaces existing __ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour h If residential: Number and type ~ hottsing unlt~.: One Family Two Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (m ieet) of largest proposed structure __ I Linear leer of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy-~s." acres. acres ultimately, proposed ,)er towr~ code (upon comp]euon of prelect)? Multiple Family Condominium height; width; length. 570 ft, Type Date ~- :~in= Oectsion? ~]Yes ~]No ~speoal use permit ~]subdw;s~on E]$ite plan management plan I~other ~ne s~te ~f d~vetoped as permitted by the ~resent zomngt ,~ s,~_ d developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? nded uses in adopted local land use plans,) ~zYes ' '~.sifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? gNo ',rroundin; !and uses within a % rniJe;' ~Yes ~No v many lots are proposed? ~ 2 ~ro:'n 1 :ho fo,'mation of sewer or wa~er districts? ~Yes ~No 'mrnunky provided services (recre;,tion, education, pofice, ~'rojected demand? ~Yes C]No ,Uic s~gnificandy above present levels{ ~Yes ~No h ,ndle the ~dditionoI traffic? ~Yes ;,niy your project If /:here are or rna,/ be any adverse and the measures which you propose to mitigate or ..tot my knowledge -on~ult~nt the Coastal Assessment Form before I~roceeding 3 Wil~ d*s[urbed a~as b~ recla.'ned~ ~Yes ~No ~}N]A a. It yes, for ,what mtend_~l'pose is the site being recialmed? b. Will topsoil be s~ockpded rot reclamation~ ~Yes ~No c. Wd~ upper subso,I be ~toc~piled for reclamaSon~ ~Yes ~No 4. How many acres of vege:ation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site~ ~ acres S. Will any mature Jores~ (over '100 ~ ears old) or other locally-important vegetation De removed by this project~ ~No ' 6. If single phase ~rolecL Ant~z,pated period of construction _ months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased a. Total number ot pha~es ~nUcipated . (~umbeu. b. Anticipated aate of commencemen~ phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month ~ d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~Yes ~No 8. Will blasting occur du~ing ¢onstruction~ ~Yes ~No 9. Number of ~obs generated: during construction ; a~ter prolect ~s complete ~. ~0 Number of iabs eliminated by this project 1~. Will pro~ect require relocation of Any prolec~s or facilities? ~Yes ~No If Yes. explain year. hncluding demolition) 12 is surface liquid waste d,sposal involvedt ~lyes ~No a If yes, indicate type of waste [sewage. industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will oe discharged 13 Is subsurface liquid waste disposal ~volved? ~Yes [~No Type 14 Will surface area of an exlst,ng water body tncrease or decrease by proposal? I~xplain I-lyes ~No "i5~ Is 'proiect or any port,on of protect located m a 100 year flood plain? E]Yes 16 Wdl the project generate solid waster ~lYes ~No a. If yes, what i~ the amount per month tons b. If yes, wff} an ex~sting solid waste fac[llty be used~ ~Yes c If ye~, give name ; location d. wdl any wastes not go into a sewage d~sposal system or into a sanitary ~andfi[l? e. If Yes, explain ~No 17. Will the ptoiect involve the disposal of solid waste~ a. If yes, what is the an¢icipated rate of disposal? b. If ye~, what ~s the anticipated site life? 1~. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? r'lYes ~Yes tons/month. years. ~]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (rnore than one hour per day)? I~Yes ~]No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? C]Yes 21 Will proiect ~esuJt in an increase in energy use? F'lyes E~No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply iS from wells, iIldicate pumping capacity __ gallons/minute 23. Total anticipated water u~age per day c~ gallons/day 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~Yes ~]No If Yes, explain J~No Southold Town Planning Board .Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk'County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only P~ART I~PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. ~-L~C,,~h'TISPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LI~CATION: ' I 4. PRECtSE LOCATION (Street address an-d road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) SEQR 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: .'~ New [] Expansion [] Modiflcatlonlal;e~'atJon 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF ~NO AFFECTED: acres Ultimately ~ ~ acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WiTH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING ~ND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~ No If No, describe briel~y 0 Residenllal ~,nduslrlal ~ Commercial ~Agriculture 0 Par~ForesllOpen spaca ~ 10. DO~S ACTION INVOLV~ A PERNIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTH~ GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, 8TATE OR LOCAL)? ~ Yes ~No If yes, Iisi agency(s) and permit/approvals ~. DOES AN~ ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ~ Yes ~No If yes, list agency name and petmiUapptovBl 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL ~ISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ~- ~f the action'~ I t' !- ' ' ' --- J is n he Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete J.~ Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment the OVER PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSI~T (To be completed by Agency) A. COE:~ ACTION ~XCEED ANY TYPE I THRES'~I~[D IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.t27 If yes, coordinate [] Yes [] No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No, a negative declaration [] Yes [] NO C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adOl~t~d, or a change in ~se or intensity of use of lanci or other natural resources? Explain brlefl Growth, subsequent development, or relatad activities likely to be Induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO eE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACTS? [] Yes [] NO If Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF S!GNIF_!CANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse eUect Identified above, deferrnine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each eltect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materiaJs. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that alt relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequafely addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF andlor prepare a positive declaration. ~ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the 'reasons supporting this determination: Name ol Lead Agency Date 2 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your 'completed applications forms. If your answer to any of the following questions is yes, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence. 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership~ abutting this parcel? ~_Y~s)~ 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, County, etc.) 5. Is there any application pending before ' ' any other agency with regard'to a different project, on this parcel? 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? 7. Does this property have a valid cer%ificate of occupancy, if yes please submit a copy of same Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No I certify that the above statements on ~y~the Planniqg ~oaAud in considering this application. ~ Zig ~a~.~U~e/~of' 'r~er/t,~o~L~%/ ~,~.~% ~ ~ / ~'/~ ~_~l~ -~e of IP P' y.~ ~er o~ authorized agent . ~ate / are true and will be relied Attachment to questionnaire for_the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: On the ~9~ .day of ~ · , 19~, before me personally came /~ ~, ~i~qQ'~ . to me known to be the individual d~escribed iQ' and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that Notary Public SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: COMMENTS: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER To the Plannln* B ~ nard of the Town of Southold: " [ The undersigued applicaut hereby applies for' (tentative) (final[----- accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Tc subdivision pla Planning. Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land nnder application. (If the applicant is not owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in s land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be 8eL off of' Cas$icty ' - 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy' of de sugg.ested.) ~ 4. The land is held by the applicant tinder deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office follows: ......... Pag.e .... Liber .' ............... p ........ age ....... 0 Liber Page . Liher .................... Pag.e Liber ........................ Pag'e ...................... · On as devised under the Last V,'ilI and Testameut of ...... or as distr~butee ....................................................................... 5. The area of the land is 15 3 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been' paid except C~one ............ 7. Tile land is encumbered bv .. "' mortg'age (s) as follows: ..................................................... (a) Mort~'a~'e recorded in l.iber · "~. ............. Pa.~e .................. in orlgh al amount of $ .............. nnpaid amount $ ..... ' .......... ...... held by ... .............. address ........................... (h) Mortgag.e recorded iu Liber ......... Pag.e ............... ........ iu original amount of tulpMd ~-~- .............. amount S ................... held hv ' address (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber .............. Page ................ in original amm of .......... unpaid amount $ ..:': held ...................... address ~ $. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except ...................... ·.. ~Qiq,~ ............................................................................. 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts Light Industrial and A/C I0. No part of the ]antl lles under water ~vhetber tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, e cept none - 11. -The appIicant shall at his expense iostall all required public improvements. 12. Th~ land ~does not) Iie in a \Vater District or \Vater Supply District. Name of tract, ,,*'"n a strict, r. ,. 13. \\rater mains ~vill be laid by and (a) (no) charge w 1 be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lioes and standards w/Il lie installed by . ......... ......... ~hT[~.q:0 ..................... and (a) (uo) charge will be made for installing salt lines. 15. Gas maios will be installed hy n/a and (a) (no) charge will be made for iastalling said ma/ns. c 16. If streets shownon the plat are claimed by the npl>licant to be existing public streets in tht Suffolk Couoty Ilighway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on'the plat are claimed by the ai)plicant to be existing public streets iu the Town of Sonthokl Ilig way sys c , atmex Schednle "C" hereto to show same. lS. There are no cxistinz [mildin~s or strnctnrcs on the land which arc not located mid shown on the plat.' ~. 19. Where tile plat slmx~s i)r,~l~,scd >Ir'cots which are extensions t,f streets on adjoining snb- division maps heretic/ore filcd, there are m) reserve strip%r~t the end of the streets oo said cx~stmg maps at their conjm~ctimks with the propt~scd st~ts. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the alqflicant will offer pr,~f of title as required by gcc. 335 of the RcM Property Law. . 21. Submit a copy of proposed lced for lots s v.'inz ali rcstricti,ms, covenants, crc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements ~vill he $ .......... as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at .............. years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company tmless other~vise sho~vn on Schedule "F". DATE .............. ............... (Name of Applicant) '[ ........ (Signature and Title) (Address) STATE OF NE\V YORK, COUNTY OF ...~..C/.~-. ~]./~..~ .................. ss: On the ... ¢>~.~ ........... day of... ~..~ ~/~ .......... 19.c~.~k-., before me personally came ..~. 1. h ~p..,~.. ?.:.~ ...... '%~.....~.~...~...~.~. f'~t~ ........... to me kno,vn to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that ............ executed the same. Notary Public c~ ARLENE J. TUTHILL NOTARY PUBLIC, Stal~ oJ New'Yo~ No. 4856450. ~ffolk County Commission Expires, April 14, lgO/ STATE OF NE%V YORK. COUNTY OF ............................ ss: Oo the ................ day ............ of .............. , 19 ....... before me personally came ....................... to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that ............ resides at No ..................................................... .............................. that .......................... is the .......... tile corporation described in ~od which execoted tile foregoing instrument; that ............ kno~vs the seal. of said corporation; that the seal affixed hy order uf the board of directors of said corporation. and that ............ signed .............. natne thereto by like order. Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and referral to the Suffolk'County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed.~ · (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. No new drainage structures or alteration ofexl~t~g' '~ '~ structqres are proposed. Yours truly, $ 617,21 SEQR Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only P?RT I--PROJECT iNFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) $, iS PRQPOSED ACTION: 7. AMOUNT OF LJ~NO AFFECTED: WILL PROPOSE0 ACTION COMPLY WIT~ EX!STING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING L.~ND USE RESTRICTIONS'/ WHAT IS PflE~ENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF pROJECT? 10. 0OEE ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY tP~DERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? DYes If yes, list DOES ANY ASpeCT OF THE ACTlatl HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ~'tyes ~No l! y~. list agcncy name ancl perm~Uapp~eval 12. AS A RE~,ULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? I"q Ye~ Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 Southold, N,Y, 11971 ($16) 765-1938 OUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FO~4S TO THE PLANNING Please complete, sign and re:urn to the Office of ~e Planning Board with your completed applicatlon$ forms. If ycur answer to any of the followlng questions is v_~es, please indicate ~hese on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence. ~ 1. Are there any wetland grasses on ~his parcel? (Ateached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by ~he Town Code, Chap<er 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your ownership, abutting this parcel? 3. Are there any building permits pendinq on this parcel? 4. Are there any other applications pending Concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, County, etc.) 5. Is there any ppllcat~on pending before any other agency wi~h regard'to a different project, on this parcel? 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Boa<d? 7. Does this property have a valid certificat& of occupancy, if yes please submit a COpy of same Yes No Yes ~ % certify that the above statements are true and will be relied on ~y, the PlanniRg ~&~d in considering this application. . Signature of {prop'~:t~ov er Or au ori~ed ~ge~ Attachment to questionnaire for the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, CQUNTY OF SUFPOLK, ss: On the ~/~ day of ~ , 19~_~, before me Personally individual escribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument Notary ~ublic X / Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk'County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structqres are proposed. Yours truly, PROJEC'F I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I~PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) ~i A~7-L~C,~-ISPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME ~. PROJECT LC~CATION: ' ) Municip.,lt, County 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) SEQR S. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: ?. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially ¢-~ ~ acres Ultimately ~ ~1~ acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? No If No, describe brielly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential ~.~lnclustrlal [] Commercial Describe: ~Agriculture []Park/Forest/Open space []Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes '[~No I! yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals tl. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTIOtl HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes ~No If ye;, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes [:~No I CERTIPY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE eEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ction~s I J If the a In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the L Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PAP, T II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSr 'MENT (To be completed by Agency) DOES ACT[ON EXCEED ANY TYPF ! THHESHOLD ]N 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 !f yes, coordmate the revmw process and use the FULL EAF. C. COULD ACTION RES!JLT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, it legible) C1. Existing air qu~Jity, surface or groundwaler quality or quantity, noise levels, existing tratfic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potenti~ for elcsion, drainage or Uoocgng problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aeslhetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, sheltfish or wddllfe species, slgnitlcant habitats, or threatened Or endangered species? Explain C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain brlefly.t ' C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly, C6. Long term, short term, cumulaRve, or other effects not identified in C1-C57 Explain brietly. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain brielly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SlGNIF_!CANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For e~ch adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each elfect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occu~ Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [~ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Name of Lead Agency Ddte · S UEFO, LK --COU'~Ty Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer to any of the following questions is y_~, please indicate these on your guaranteed survey or submit other appropriate evidence~ 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) 2. Are there any other premises under your Ownersh±p.% abutting this parcel? ~es~> 3. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? 4. Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before any other department or agency?(Town , State, County, etc. 5. Is there any application pending before any other agency with regard'to a different project~ on this parcel? 6. Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? 7. Does this property have a valid certificate of occupancy, if yes please submit a copy of same No Yes ~ Yes ' o~ Yes ~ Yes ~ Yes N~ I certify that the above statements are true and will be relied on DY, the Planning Boa-rd in considering this application. . Sigma are of prop~ert~y~o~er o au~or~ed~a en· Attachment to questionnaire for~.~the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss: On the ~ day of_ ~ . , 19~_~, before me personally came~ ~ ~(~'~ to me known to be the individual escribed in' and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that .~ exe~ute~the sameT~ Notar~ Public ~ LINDA $. TAGGART Nolm'Y Pul3~I~ Slale ol' New y~.~ · , Prepared by ProjectS. ...... on the environment Please complete the entire fOrm, Parr5 ^ th,ough E ,nforma~on ~rou believe will be needed ~o complete Parts 2 and 3 / h zs expected that ~omplebon of the full EAF will ~e dependen~ on information ~wdl new studies, research or investigation If in~G~ma~ioq requ~rina such Jddidonal worL ~s~n~a~ a9 ~, so ~n -~ spec each instance, LoVe ~an~ Bnx .!459 I<atti[uak Andre~,~ Camsi,~ anc~ Sons %'est Hill To setoff' '~' ~ %";t Industrial du:-; trier tBUSINESS TELEPHONE (5,16~ ~98-Sz! 29 TELEPHONE zone¢? ~rooerty, 2o!Iov~ing zoning line, ~rom ren~ainin~ 5~ :~c-~rs$. Please Complete Each Question- Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas 1. Present land use: ~Urban DJndustriaJ r-lCommerc~al L'3Res~denual (suburban) ~]Forest 2, TotaJ acreage of project area: 3. What is predominant soil typefs) on project site? ~Agriculture E3Other 5 ?, ~. ___ acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE . PRESENTLY Meadow or Brush[a~d (Non:agricultural) Forested acre~ A~rJcu[turaJ ~tndudes orchards, cropland pasture, etc.) ~ acres *WeHand ~Freshwater or ~idaJ as per Attic es 24 25 of ECL) 1 ~ _ acres Water Surface Area .5 acres Unve~etated (Rock, earth or fill) acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate typeL b~kru~ topsoil, ~RuraJ (non-farm) A. FTE R COMPLETION .... a~res 3 D acres _ 1 ? acres ..... ,-,-- acres a. Soil drainai;e: ~Well drained. 70 % of site E3Modera~ely well drained 2C % of site C3Poorly drained 10 ~ % of site br If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soft are classified within soil groLp 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? ~acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) ~ 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ~]Yes ~No a. What is depth to bedrock? _ ~ _ (in feet) 6, ;Is Prole¢~ substantially con,t~uous to, o~ con,am ~ building, s~te, or Re~is~ers of Historic Ptaces~ ~Yes ~No 7: Is projec~ substantially cont%guous to a si~e listed on the ~e~ister of National Natu;al Landmarks~ ~Yes ~No 8 Wh~t is the depth of the water table~ t.g (in feet) 9. Is site loc~ed over a primary, ptmci.paL or ~a]e ~ourco aquiier~ gY~s ~No 10 DO hunt.n~, fishm~ or shell fi~hing opportunities presently exist m the prolect 11. Does project si~e contain any species of plan~ or animal life that is ~dentified as threaLened or enda~ered? ~Yes ~No Accatdin~ to upOh ~n~m~tin~ Identify each species 12. Are there any umque or unusual land forms on the pro~ect sitet [i.e., cliff% dunes, other geological formations) Describe 13. is the project ~ite presenUy used by The community or neighborhood as an open ~pace or recreahon area)' If yes, explain., 't4. Does the present site include scemc views known to be important to the community? E]Yes [~No 15. Streams within or contiguous' [o project area: .,, ~hamo~u,~ PO~d a, Name of Stream and name of R~ver to which iL is ~ributary Mill Creek C 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name , b. Size (Ir1 acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilitie$~ :~lYes al If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? "~Yes ~No b) If Yes, wdJ improvements be necessary to allow connec~on~ ~Yes ~No ~8. ls ~he s~te located in an ~gr~cul[ural district certified pursuant to A~ricuJture and Market~ Law, Article 25-AA Section 3(~3 and 304~ ~Yes ~No 19 is ~he site located in ot substantially cont~uous ~o a C~tical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes ~No gnknovT~ 20, Has the site ever been used for [J~e disposal of solid or hazardous wastes~ ~Yes C B. Project Description 1. Physical d.;mensions and scale of project [i~ill in dimensions as appropriate) a, Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor . 6~. _~ , acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 4.5 acres initially; acres ultimately, c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped 5.q ,., acres. 'd, Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. if tile project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ' proposed ,)er t~t.]~ code g. Maximum veh,cuJat trips generated per hour (upon completion of proiect? h If reslder, t~aJ: Number and type Of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family C:ond~minium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (m feet) of targest proposed suucture __ height .... width; length I. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy-~s? 3 City; ]'own, Village Board E3Yes ~No City, 'rown, Village Planning Board ~]Ye.s E3No City, TOwn Zoning Board ~]Yes Cty County Health Depart?neat Other Local Agencies F3Yes Other Regional Agencies F-~Yes F3No State Agencies , ~Yes ~No Federal Agencies - ~Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? . If Yes, indicate decision required: ,'-INa Date l-lz°ning amendmen[ ~'zonm~, variance ~speclal use permit []]subdivision Usite plan ~new/revision of master plan ~resource management ~lan ~othec 2, What is the zoning classification[slof the si~e? ~ R-~0 -' 3, What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present z0ning7 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ~ DD 5, Wha[ is the maximum potentiaJ development of the s,te if developed as permitted by the ptoposed zoning? 6. Is the Proposed denon consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Yes 7 What are the predominant land use(si and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed ~ct on? 8. Is the proposed action com0at/ble with adjoining/surrOunding land uses within a ~ rniie~ ~Yes ~No 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot s~ze proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(~) for the formation of sewer or water distucts? ~Yes ~No 11, Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided Services (recreation, education po/ce tire protecbon)? ~Yes ~No , a, If yes, is emstmg capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic s~gnificantiy above preset~t levels~ ~Yes ~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes O. Informational Details Attach any additiona. I information as may be needed to clarify your project If there ar~* 0r may be any adverse impacts associated with you/proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which yc,o propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification · .. I..certify that the information provided above is tr . '~P~?~t'~r,ISponsclr Name ~:le~z'v ~. R~.~Or ue to the be~t of my knowledge ..... ~ ~ ~ .~ Tire 20~ulLanL - " .-- ' with this assesSmenl 5 . Will di~[urbed ar~as be reclautj~ EYes ~No ~N/~, a, If yes, for ,what intend~Furpose is the site being recta reed? b. Will topsoil .be ~tockpded tot reclamation? ~Yes ~No C. Will upper 5ubsod be ~tockpiled for reclamation~ ~Yes ~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? n acres, S. Wilt'any mature fores~ (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed b~ this project~ ~No 6. If single phase project: Antizipated period of construction ~ , months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated _ b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase __ (number). month year, lincluding demolition month year d, Is phasel functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8, will blasting occur during c0nstruction~ ~Yes [Z]No 9. Number of iobs generated: during construction 10 Number of lobs eliminated by this project . 71. Will proiect require relocation of any projects or facilities? 12 Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ~lyes ~No a If yes, indicate t;ype of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b, Name of water body ir. to which effluent will be discharged f-rYes ~No ; after project is complete __. I-~Yes ~]No If yes. explain 13 Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes [~No Type '14 Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposat~ Explain OYes fi]No 15. Is project or any portion o~ project located in a 100 year flood plain? 16 Will the project generate solid wastu~ (Z]Yes F~No a, If yes, what iS the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used~ ~]Yes E3No c If yes, give name ; location d. E}Yes l~]No Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? If Yes, explain ElYes E3No ~,7. Will the proiect involve the disposal of solid waste? ~3Yes :~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b, If yeS, what ts the anticipated ~ite life? years, 18, Will prelect use herbicides or pesticides~ r'lyes t~No 191 Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ,~Yes ~]No 20. Will prelect produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ~Yes 21 Will project result in an increase in energy use? E~Yes l~No If yes , indicate type(s} g~No 22. If water supply, is from ,wells, indicate pumping capacity 23, Total anticipated water usage per day N gallons/day 24. Does project involve Local, State or .¢ederal funding? E]Yes If Yes, explain __ gallons/minute l~3No TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OWNER FORMER OWNER L~oa~c S PROPERTY RECORD CARD VILLAGE DIST.I ACR. W SUB. LOT TYPE OF BUILDING ' RES. SEAS. VL. COMM. CB. MICS. Mkt. Volue ID IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS - ,~. Woodland ,: 5- ~ Meadowland House Plot Total j ..---//../..:~...,. / FRONTAGE ON WATER FRONTAGE ON ROAD DEPTH. BULKHEAD OWNER FORMER OWNER TOWN OF $OUTHOLD PROPERTY RY. S~S. STREET VILLAGE N W IMP. TOTAL /as DATE BUILDING CONDILrlON BELOW ABOVE Value Per Value AGE NEW NORMAL FARM Acre RECORD CARD SUB. ACR. CoZ &_ TYPE OF ~ING LOT COMM. REMARKS CB. /~ICS. Mkt. Value dl I .... , . Meadowland i / ' '~, ' House Plot Total FRONTAGE ON ROAD .DEPTH BULKHEAD FRONTAGE ON WATER CO~iENTS: ; ~iJcc( $OUTHOLD lOWN _ I PLANNING BOARD ,] SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD DATE: SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM#: SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER F r,,~ ~y COMMENTS: (~ pri~ SEP I 3 1994 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ~ld Tow;n P~nnin~ Bo~rr~ 14 Aul~us~ 22, 1994 Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Ward: Andrew Cas id Sons - This proposal is to set off a 4.5131 acre parcel from an existing 62.5829 acre parcel located on the west side of Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and the south side of Albertson's Lane in Greenport. SCTM# 1000-52-5- 59.3 & 59.4. (change tape). Is the applicant here tonight? OK, the agent is here. Henry Raynor: Good evening Mr. Chairman, members of the Board. My name is Henry Raynor, representing the Cassidy's. This division set off you have before you is basically to allow a use on the LI property, 4.5 acres, from the remaining residential farm. This action was begun before your Board in November of 1992 and we received a Negative Declaration from your Board in March of 1993. There's been considerable back and forth, discussion and correspondence in regard to the covenants and restrictions on the property and finally we received approval from the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services at the end of 1993. In July of 1994 we received the final approval from Suffolk County as well as the County Attorney's office with regard to the property. I believe your Board is in possession of the signed, stamped, working copy from the Dept. of Health. As of yet, the mylars and the paper prints have not been returned to us; we weren't in possession of those until last Saturday. We're aware the Board is still in need of those and we'll probably be able to produce those within a week. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them. Mr. Ward: Is there anybody here that would like to address the Board on this particular set off? If not, I think even/thing is in order to close the hearing. Mr. McDonald: I move to close the hearing. Mr. Latham: I second that. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. McDonald: I make a further motion that WHEREAS, Andrew Cassidy & Sons are the owners of the property known and designated as SCTM# 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 located on the west side of Main Rd. (NYS Rt. 25) and the south side of Albertson's Lane in Oreenport; and WHEREAS, this proposed set off is to set-off a 4.5131 acre parcel, located in the L.I. Zoning District, from an existing 62.5829 acre parcel located in the R-80 Zoning District and the L.I. Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on April 12, 1993; and 15 AugL~l: 22. '1994 WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said subdivision application at the Town Hall, Southold, New York on August 22, 1994; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore, RESOLVED, t~hat the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated August 3, 1993, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to fulfillment of the following conditions. All conditions must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution: I. Submission of six (6) paper prints and two (2) mylars of the final subdivision. All maps must contain a valid stamp of Health Dept. approval and a notation that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed. The notation must include the Liber and Page Number of the recorded declaration. Mr. Latham: Second the motion. Mr. Ward: Motion seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. War~L Demetrios A. Tertis and Goose Creek Assoc ates, Inc.- This lot line change is~subtract 2,914 square feet from a 48,653 square foot by Demetrios'A.: Tertis and add it to a 38,332.8 square foot right of owned by Goose Creek As§'ec~iates, Inc. located in Southold, SCTM# 1000- and 1000- 79-2-3.8. Is the al~l~[i, cant here or agent of the applicant, th like to address the Board? '. Tony Lewandowski: I was a'~,cl by the ap[ questions you might have. Mr. Ward: Is there anybody here on this particular lot ne change? If hearing. Mr. Orlowski: So moved. and answer any that would like to address the Board I think everything is in order to close the Mr. Latham: Second. Mr. Ward: Secor All in favor? Ayes: Mr, Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Ward. Opposed? Motion carried. What's the pleasure of the Board? Mr, STATE OF N, YORK] ) SS: ~UN~ OF._SU~9, _L~.) ^ ~of Mattituck, in said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMF_~, Weekly Newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of 8uffulk State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regular- ly published in said Newspaper once each week ~ ~T._ weeks s _uccessively, .l~o~nmencing on .day of ~..~19(L~. SOUTHO~D PLANNING B O~L?__... ..... LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Plan- ning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 22nd day of August, 1994 on the question of the following. 7:30 P.M. Final public hear- ing for the proposed major subdivision, for Angel Shores, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suf- folk, State of New York. Suf- folk County Tax Map Number 1000=88-6-1, 4 & 5. The property is bordered on the northeast by Main Bayview Rd; on the southeast by Cedar Beach Rd; on the southwest by Cedar Point Rd, by land now or formerly of Zevits, by land now or formerly of Kophen, by land now or formerly of Hancock, by land now or formerly of Mullins; by Peconic Bay, by land now or formerly of Vanderbeek; on the southeast by Little Peconic Bay Lane; on the northwest by Terry Waters Subdivision (Suffolk County File f2901), and Rambler Road. 7:35 P.M. Final public hear- ing for the proposed minor subdivision for Jeanann Gray Dunlap, Martha Kent Gray and Benjamin H. Gray, on Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suf- folk, State of New York, Suf- folk County Tax Map Number 1000-6-5-13.1. This propertyis bordere? q the north by Fox Ave; o~ .e northeast by land now or formerly of Doyen; on the southeast by land now or formerly of Edwards; on the southeast by Mansion House Drive, by Sappho Rd; on the south by land now or formerly of McCance; and on the northwest by Fox Ave. 7:40 P.M. Final public hear- ing for the proposed minor subdivision for Willow Ter- race Farms, in Orient, Town of Southold, County of Suf- folk, State of New York, Suf- folk County Tax Map Number 1000-26-39.10. This property is bordered on the north by land now or formerly of Douglas, by land now or f~ormerly of Schiller, by land now or formerly of Brenner and by land now or formerly of Schorer and by King Street, on the northeast by land now or formerly of Kanz, by land now or formerly of Liburt, by land now or formerly of O'Con- nor & Leudesdorf; on the east by land now or former- ly of Major Associates; o9 the southeast by land now ot formerly of Douglass, on the south by Willow Terrace Lane, on the southwest by land now or formerly of Lot #8 of Willow Terrace, Section 1, by land now or formerly of Mager; on the west by Rowe Drive, by Lot #11 of Willow Terrace, Section 1, by land now or formerly of Douglass, by Nelson Drive. 7:45 P.M. Final public bear- ing for the proposed set off for Mary Holland (Estate of Frank Dawson), in New Suf- folk, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-117-9-19.1 This property is bordered on the north by land now or formerly of. Gandolfi; on the east by Third Street; on the south by Jackson,Street; on the southwest by land now or formerly of Price and Herschfeld; and on the nor- thwest by land now or formerly of Price. 7:50 P.M. Final public hear- ing for the proposed set off for ~ Aml~ C~u~fidy and Sons, ~n Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suf- folk, State of New York, Suf- folk County Tax Map Number 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4. The property is bordered on the north by land now or formerly of Cassidy, by land now or formerly of Barz- czewski, by Albertson's Lane and cemetery; on the east by land now or formerly of Melrose; on the southeast by NYS Rt 25; on the south by Long Island Railroad; on the southwest by Arshamoma- que Pond; on the west by land now or formerly of Yaxa; and on the northwest by land now or formerly of Cassidy. 7:55 P.M. Final public hear- ing on the proposed lot line change for Demetrios A. Ter- tis and Goose Creek Associates, Inc., in Southold Town of Southold, County of Suffolk State of New York, Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-78-8-21 and 79-2-3.8. This property is bordered on the north by Goose Creek Lane; on the northeast by North Bayview Road; on the southeast by land now or formerly of Tertis; and on the southwest by open space in the James W. Dawson Field Subdivision, Map No. 7987. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time .and place specified. Dated July 18, 1994 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Richard G. Ward Chairman 1X-8/11/94(1) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Editor, of the TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Traveler-Watchman once each week for z/ .............................. weeks suc~sj~Jvely, commencing on the Sworn to before me on this of Notary Public BARBARA k SCHN£1DER NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No, 4806846 Qualified in Suffolk Co~m~, Commission Expires o°~.~V?~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Odowski, Jr. Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 July 12, 1994 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Andrew Cassidy & Sons SCTM# 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 11, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, August 22, 1994 at 7:50 p.m. for a final public heating on the maps dated August 3, 1993. Please note that five (5) paper prints and two (2) mylms of the final subdivision must be submitted prior to the heating. All maps must contain a valid stamp of ttealth Depm~anent approval and a notation that a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed. The notation must include the Liber and Page number of the recorded declaration. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman cc: Jim Monsell, Greenport Public Utilities HENRY E. RAYNOR PO BOX 1459 32~] LOVE I. ANE MATTITUCK, N.Y. 11952 516-2c~8-8420 TN: ~nl ITH~I RF': 1~1~O-52 ¢5-59.3 ~ND 59.4 ENCLOSED HERWITH ARE ENDORSED COPIE~ <2~ 0F MAP APPROVED BY THE SUFFOLK CTY. DEPT OF 'HEALTH. IF ALt_ IS IN ORDER PLEASE SET THIS FOR A FINAL_ PUBLIC HEA~ING AT THE BOARD'S EARLIEST MEETING. I ~:: SOUTHOU) TOWN I FI.ANNING ~OARD HENRY ~. ~AYNOR PO BO~ 1459 320 LOVE LANE MATTITUCK. N.Y. 11952 516-298-8420 516-~9B 2127 (FAX) JUNE 30. 1994 TO: SOUTHOL~ TOWN PLANNING BOARD RE: CASS~DY MINOR ~ ~ ~S~--~"q°~/ PLEASE BE AIgV~SED THAT WE ~AV~ JUST ATTAINED APPROVAL OF THE COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS N~CESSARY ~0~ THE SUFFOLK COUNTY ~E~. OF HEALTH, IF THERE ARE ANY EXTENSION NECESSARY AT THIS TIME; DLEAS~ CONSIDER THIS AS A FORMAL REQUEST. AS SOON AS DEPT~ OF HEALTH PAPERWORK HAS B~EN STAMPED. ~'~ ARE REOU~STIN~ A ~INAL WEA~ING AS SOON ~S POSSIBLE. SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY OU~TIDNS~ PLEASE DON'T HE~ITAT~ TO C~LL 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY June 6, 1993 11952 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: minor subdivision of Cassidy at Main Road, Southold Dear Sirs: As requested, pIease find enclosed a conformed copy of the covenants and restrictions filed at the County Clerk's office with regard to the above referenced subdivision. Sincereiy, nry,£. RWynor, Jr. HER:m1 Enc. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY May 19, 1993 11952 VIA FAX 765-1823 Southo!d Town Planning Board Main Road $outhold, NY 11971 ATTN: Melissa Spiro RE: Proposed set off fox' Andrew Cassidy & Sons w/s Main Road and s/$ Albertsou's Lane, Greenport SCTM ~ 1000-u.-u-~9.3 and 59.4 Dear Melissa: As.equ_s~e.,~ ~-~ ~ May. 4, 1993, please find enclosed tlne revised covenants and restrictions with regard to the above captioned whzcn include those ~.,~ue~ by the Suffolk County Planning Commission. We await the Town Attorney's approval of same so that a copy can be filed %.~ith the Suffolk County C!erk'5 office. Sincerely, Henry E. Raynor, Jr. HER :ml Eno. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTR%CT%0NS THIS INDENTURE made this day of , 1993 Dy ANDREW F. CASSIDY AND THOMAS P. CASSiD¥, as attorneys in fact for Herbert O. Casaidy~ Joan Corie, Thomas P. Cassidy, Ellen Po Cassidy. Andrew F. Cassidy, Carole Cassidy and Andrew R. Cassidy, residing i~t 1815 Albertson Lane, Greenpor%, New York, hereinafter called ~he DECLARANTS. WI{EREA$, the Declarants are the o~ners in fee sis!plo of a certain parcel of land situate at Greenport, Town of Southold, C~unty of Suffolk~ State of New York, designated on ti~e S~ffolk County Tax Map a~ Distr~ct 1000, Section 52, Bloc~ 5, Lot 59~4 containing approximately 62.5829 acres, being the same premises acquired by the DECLARANTS by deed da~ed August 19, 3986 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on in Libor cf Deeds at page and refer~ed to hereinafter as the "premises" and WHEREAS, the Declarants intend to subdiv}~e said premises for residential purposes and ~e~ire to subject said premises to certain cendition~, covenants an~ restrictions in order to preserve the maximum open space~ ~aturhl ~cenic beauty and natural yes, oration and to p~event the overcrowding a~kd to conserve the §round water resources of the To~n of Southold, and WHEREAS~ the Decla~nts h~ve ~pplied to the P~annlnq Board of the Town of Sodthold for approval to set off 4.5!3! acres from 62.5829 acres, NOW, THEREFORE, the DeclaraBts do hereby declare that the aforementioned s~la premises and every pertion thereof is hereby held and shall be conveyed subject, ko the conditions, covenants and restri-"tions hereinafter set for%h, and that every purchaser of said premises or any portion thereof, by the acceptance efa deed thereto, covenants, and agrees that the premises shall be held subject ~.o the covenants, condir, ions and restrictior~s hereinafter set forth. All stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of this subdivision or any of its lots sha!l be re%ained on the site by adeq~ate drainage structures so that it will not flow into the right-cf-way of M~in Road (S.R.25). A buffer area in compliance with the minimum standards of Section 100-213 of the Southo]d Tow~ Code will be required prior %o the issuance of an}' building permit for Lot Number A landscaped strip in of Section 200-212 of prior to the issuance compliance with the minimum standards the Southold To~,.;n Code will be required of any building permit for Lot Number 1. There s~%al= be no further subdivision of Lot Number 1 in perpetuity. Lot Nu~nber 2 shall not be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any further date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Plannin~ Board. That all of the covenants, conditions and restricticns contained herein shall be soDstr~led as real covenants running with the land and shall continue and remain in full force ~nd effect at a!l times as against nhe owller of the premises or any portion thereof in perpetuity. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be binding upon, inure to the benefi~ of and be enforceable by the Declarant, thei~ heirs, successors and assigns, and the Town of Southcld and its successors or assigns, and the failure of ~ny of the foregoing to enforce any of such covenants, conditions and restrictions shall in no event be deemed ~ waivere of the right to do so thereafter. The Declarantg ~raat the continuing right in perpetuity to the Town of Eouthoid or any of its designated representatives to inspect any areas dcsi~=~.a%ed as ope~% space, common areas or similar nomenclature so as ~o insure conti~ued compliance with the covenants, t~rms and provisions designated herein in regard to same artd to insure that svch covenants, ter~s and provisions have not bee~ , load*ted. The Declarants grant th~ continuing right in perpetuity to the Town of Southcld or shy of its designa%ed representatives to .~nfcrce the conditions ~nd restrictions of the coYenants as they rel.xte to the open space, common area or nomenctat~re and to take any legal action it deems necessary to enforce the conditions and restrictions of the covenants. These rights ¢)f inspection and enforcement s~a!l be binding upon decl=rants, their heirs, executors, legal represe~tst~ves, distributees, successors, assigns and tcansfereeso ANDREW F. CASSIDY THOMAS P. CASSIDY STATE OF NEW YORK) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) On %h~s d~y of , !993~ before me personally came Andrew F. Cassid¥ and Th(~mas P. Cas£idy, to me known to De the individuals described herein and who ~×ecuted the fiorego~ng instrument and ~cknow!ed~ed that they ex~cuted same. NOTARY PUBLIC PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York I 1971 Fax (516) 765-1823 May 4, 1993 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed Set-off for Andrew Cassidy & Sons W/s Main Road and s/s Albertson's Lane, Greenport SCTM9 1000-52-5-59.3 & 5 .4 Dear Mr. Raynor, The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 3, 1993: BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the April 15, 1993 Suffolk County Planning Coramission report with the following amendments (numbers correspond to numbers in report): 91. Is to remain as written. #2. Is to be revised as follows: As per Section 100-213 of the Town Code a transition buffer area is required along all boundaries of a nonresidential lot abutting any lot in a residential district. The minimum buffer area for Industrial districts as required by this Section is thirty (30) feet. A buffer area in compliance with the minimum standards of Section 100-213 will be required prior to the issuance of any building permit for Lot Number 1. #3. Is to be revised as follows: As per Section 100-212 of the Town Code, in all nonresidential districts, there shall be a landscaped strip in the front yard area. The minimum area in the Light Industrial Districts is a strip twenty-five (25) feet in width. A landscaped strip in compliance with the minimum standards of Section 100-212 will be required prior to the issuance of any building permit for Lot N~mber 1. #4. Is to be revised as follows: There shall be no furhter subdivision of Lot Number 1 in perpetuity. (The applicant has put forth a covenant and restriction on this lot restricting it from any further subdivision.) Lot Number 2 shall not be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any further date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. 95. Is to be omitted. Buffer areas as described in Numbers 2 and 3 above will be required. Numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4 must be presented in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in proper legal form. (These covenants and restrictions should be included with the previously submitted covenants and restrictions so that there is only one Declaration for the subdivision.) A copy of the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Town Attorney. Once approved, the document must be filed in the Office of the County Clerk and the Liber and Page nun~ber of the recorded document must be noted on the final maps. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman Encl. cc: Suffolk County Planning Commission PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S, McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 May 5, 1993 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Set-off for Andrew Cassidy & Sons W/s Main Road and s/s Albertson's Lane, Greenport SCTM9 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has received the draft covenant and restriction revised as per your letter of April 4, 1993. Please refer to the Board's letter of May 4, 1993 for additional covenants and restrictions pertaining to the subdivision. Upon submission of a revised draft including the additional covenants and restrictions, the document will be be forwarded to the Town Attorney for review. Sincerely, Melissa Spi~o Planner DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFfNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE Arthur H. KUNZ April 15, 1993 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision - Andrew Cassidy & Sons N/w/s of Main Road, N.Y.S. Rte. 25, 584.37 feet s/w/o Albertson's Lane, Greenport, New York Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on April 14, 1993, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Andrew Cassidy & Sons" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning Fr~ Dowling, Srz~anner Subdivision Reviw~ivision File: S-SD-93-02 FD:mb Attachment cc: J. Baler, C.E., SCDHS H LEE DENNISON BUILDING · VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY · HAUPPAUGE NEW yORK 11788 · (516) 853 5192 File No. S-SD-93-02 Resolution No. ZSR-93-31 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, RESOLVED, RESOLVED, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on March 4, 1993, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Minor Subdivision - Andrew Cassidy & Sons" submitted by the Town of Sonthold Planning Board affecting premises located on the n/w/s of Main Road, N.Y.S. Rte. 25, 584.37 feet s/w/o Albertson's Lane, Greenport in the Town of Southold, New York, and said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on April 14, 1993, and the Commission has voted to approve with certain changes said referral, Be It Therefore That the Suffolk County Planning Co~ission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Further Be It That said proposed plat is approved subject to the meeting of the following conditions that are deemed necessary to help preserve the natural and aesthetic attributes of the adjoining residential area and the traffic and safety carrying capacity of Main Road (S.R. 25). All stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of this subdivision or any of its lots shall be retained on the site by adequate drainage structures so that it will not flow into the right-of-way of Main Road (S.R. 25). A buffer or replanting area at least 25 feet in width shall be established along the boundary of Lot No. I with the residential property. Except for curb cuts and proper sight distance requirements a buffer area shall be provided along Main Road to help preserve the natural vegetation along the road, so as to enhance the aesthetics of the road and help minimize the erosion potential. No lot shall be subdivided or its lot lines changed in any manner at any future date unless authorized by the Town of Southold Planning Board. A fence, in accordance with zoning requirements as to height and type, shall be erected by the subdivider along the common boundary of this subdivision with the adjoining residential property. The fence will help to avoid any conflicts that may arise between the future lot owners and the users of the industrial property. Resolution No. ZSR-93-31 Page 2 The 2o Commission also offers the following con~nents on the map: As part of the site plan review process, a limit of 2 curb cuts should be allowed on the property with coordinated parking if possible to help preserve the safety and traffic carrying capacity of Main Road. It is suggested that before approval is granted to this subdivision that the subdivider be required to submit this proposal to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for review to insure that the proposed subdivision will meet the requirements and standards of that agency. According to a map that was received from the State of New York this property appears to be located within an area that is considered to be archaeologically sensitive. Many sites contain material and/or buildings that are of prehistoric or historic value. These sites should be preserved or developed with a sensitivity for historic or cultural values that can be available for the appreciation of future generations. Motion by: Commissioner Shepard Seconded by: Commissioner Stahlman Commission Vote: i1 Present Yeas i1 Nays 0 Abstentions 0 Dated April 14, 1993 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 April 13, 1993 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Set-off for Andrew Cassidy & Sons W/s Main Road and s/s Albertson's Lane, Greenport SCTM# 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on April 12, 1993: Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this Type 1 action, and as lead agency, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. The set off is not expected to have a significant environmental impact as at this time it will result in the creation of two lots divided along the zoning boundary. Future subdivision of the R-80 portion of the site will undergo careful delineation of the wetlands and detailed environmental review. The applicant has put forth a covenant and restriction on the LI portion of the site restricting it from any further subdivision. Any site plan submitted for the parcel will require wetland delineation, and depending upon the use and design, mitigation may be required. A copy of the Negative Declaration is enclosed for your records. Andrew Cassidy & Sons April 13, 1993 Page 2 Please contact this office if you have an~- quest].ons regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard Gl Ward Chairman Encl. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY April 4, 1993 11952 Southold Town Main Road Southold, NY Planning Board 11971 RE: Cassidy Set off (1000-52-5-$9.3 and 59.4) Dear Sirs: We propose to include t:he following paragraph in the covenants and restrictioDs requested by your Board to clarify that only the parcel to be set off will be subject to these covenants· To be inserted as "1."' "That the condltions~ covenants and restrictions set forth herein shall affect only the 4.5131 acre parcel to be set'off from the 62~5529 acres. The balance of the remaining property shall in no way be affected by these couditioas, covenants a~d restrictions.- If this meets with the Town Attorney's approval, we will ~ake the necessary revisions to the covenants submitted, then file them at the County Clerk's office. We await your reply. Sincerely, · Rayn(~r, Jr. HMR:ml / SOUTHOLO TO~A'N -i L PLANN{NG BOARD ~t~Mt=R v OCIATES April 2, 1993 Mr. Richard Ward Chairman Southold Planning Bo.ard Town Hall, 53095Mare Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, NewYork 11971 Re: Andrew Cassidy & Sons Setoff SCTM# 1000-052,00-05.00-59.3 & 59.4 Dear Dick: · As per your re quest, we. have...,completed, a prelimh~ary. ,, review, of the above referenced project, Tasks and completed acuvme~ are ~denufied as foho,'s. 1. Review Part ! LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by C. VA, a~.d, ~he LEAF has beert reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same ~s attacnca. Prepare Part I_,I LEAF The Part II LeAF ch, ecklist h~.as .been completed and i5 also attached. Additional i.,fforrnadon concermng our findings is included below. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and .area'have been consulted, Theproj?ct.is currently vacant. The site totals 62.58 acres m size. x'i~e proposal involves tile dtvls:on of property into one 4.5 acre lot for a future industr, iai use (Lot 1) and one 58,1 acre lot (~ot 2) for a fut. ure. res.!.dential uses. The subject site is adjacent Hashamomaque Pond and docs. contain s;lgmficapt _ _ environmental resources as defined by wetlands. This site is zoned K-80 and LI. The LI-light ~,ndustrial zoning requires a lot yield based upon 40,000 squ__are foot lots,or greater a.n,d the R-80 reqmres lots in excess of 80,000 s.q. uare feet. 'll~.e proposea project wul have to conform to the Suffolk County Samtary Code Ar :~¢le 6 for any t'uture uses on the two lots to be created, Fbqcl ~nqnection finds that the site contains significant wetlands. Freshwater wetlands are present on much of h~e. wesl side o~ proposed lot. 1, as .w.,:!l as Ix~t .~. Sofi.s on. site include Haven Loam and filled land (adjacent the railroad line and some weuana areas). Wac depth to ground ,,vat,er i.s less_than !,0 feet ore, ira, u. ch 9.f ,:h.e si?. Tl].e site is within the Greenport Wa.:er D~stnct.. ?.rounawater .unu. enymg me she :s no, no,urn compromised due to nitrogen and pest~clde use on agriCUltural lands. The upiana ~ NO~TH ~OUNTRY ROAD, ~UIT~ ~, ~ILLEF~ PLA~E~ NY 117~ ~ ~[ANNIN~ BOARD Andr~ Cas$1dy & Sons Scroll Long EAF Review ' of the site are dominated by,overgrown field, and Are ?.?ectecl t.o su. pport a pot?ohs ~ . -~ ...... ,~;~ ~,,-cles as well as some h,,rpules. The site nas variety ot avian a.nu ,n?.-,.-~-,,~_~., e Bate access t£ot~. ~1~ ~Oao ~b}rtson or Cas~idy Lane. %e site is visible from both of these roadways. ~e [aad division.is not expected [o hav~.9?igal?~t ynylronp~ental.impact as i time ~t will result m the creation o[ ~o i:z) mt~ mvx?a ~long tee zonm~ ~t th ~ ~ t "~' '-:~' ~ 'he R 80 nort~on of the sge will reauire car~tul , he submission occurs. Wetlands wall req ' design, ~tigatlon may be requked. B~se~ u on this. review, and if the Board is in.agreement, ~ fe~I t~at a ocl~rauoa is ~nro~nate for thiq project. I hooe th~sletter vrowaes the ~caro w~ta me . ,,.,[L~ [2 ~,~,~ ~e revtew of tfiis ~roject. ~e would be pleased [o provide additional input upoa request, flease oo not nes~a~ [~ ~ ..... : .......... Charles J. Voorh[s, c£p, enc: Part I/II LEAF CONSULTANTS Page 2 d ,~tt;~ of overall ~toJect, ba~h develeped and ~nd~doped ;; ~OXI,~TE ACREAGE . 'PRESENTLY ;Mcludcs 6rch~rds. cropland, pa~tur~>, etC.) ~_~0 .... tFteshwater or [ida/n~ p~r A;~;c/es 24, 2~ of ~CL) [Rock, e~rth or till) ~ildi~gt and other paved s'drf~CC~ ..... aCreS ~:<. , .Lzr~dCi~ss,fica:~n ~ystom~ ..... =ares [~ee , NYC~R ~70) AFTER CQMPLETIO~ acre: .... _ ~Cre! :, ~Y~ ~No A~COrOm~ tO ',, ~. Nlme ~.. ,~. ...... ,. _.~ b Size (In acros} 1~ '' 11. l~: th~ ~,te s~rwd by ~x~st~ng punic utilities? :~Yes 5. , bJ It Yc~, will im~tovim~ntt be nocessoey to allow connecbon~ ~er,hi.~ ~tsuant to ' ot ~h~ ~CL, ~nd 6 biYCRR 517, ~Yes ~No ~j H~* f~ ~i~e ever b~h u$~d for th~ ~$po~al ~3ohd or hazardou~ Boscrlptlon Prolect acreage to remain under, Ctoped _~..,.. . ~ ff the ptojecl 1~ an exjanqion, indica}a percen~ o~ ~xpan,{4,1 p/oposed ....... %. Number of off-street parklnw ' , ' ' , One Family Two F~mHy Mu(tip~o Famdy ('und,)mlnl~m , ~¢ O{~en$,~s (m te~t) of largesl ptopoled ~;rucCurO ~ height; ...... w d~h .~ lensth. ;' Lmea, Icet o~ {ron~*~e ~ton~ a public lhorou~F, fare .4 ', ' ' , ~ · r' ,, ,,,' , 4, How m~ny ~¢ra¢ o~ v.ge,*.~n ,~ ees. ~hrubs. g~ound COvetS)'will be removed f~om ~. (,f single obese proi*cl: Anbcipa~ pctlod of construction ..... mon~RS, (;rctud~n~t demolition). ?. It multi }ha~J. " ~. Approximat~ compiezicn d~¢ of final ph~*~ .... month b, N~me of water b~dy ir, t,) wMch eh,ucn~ w~l! be "' ' ' ' .. ............ 1~, I$'pro~ec~ or any por~',~n of ~oi.ct oc~ted m ~ 100 'tear flood pl*;n~ ~Yc~ a Il ,/et, what r¢ the amour,~ per mornh _ .-~ ~ ~ tons d. Il yet. ~,hai Js the anticipated ra~e of dispos~i? ...... tons/m~n(h. project routinely produce odors (more than one hour pet dav]~ ~Yes ~N,~ DtOJeC~ prOduCe opcr~On~ noise e~cceding ~fle toe31 ~mbient no;~ levels? ~Ycs Total ~ndcip~ed woter u~,sg. ~,~r dnv ~ _ ~Ilans/d~y Does pin eot mvoh e Local Si.re ot r~der~l fuflgt/[g? ~Yes ~No .,. ,'"2~. Approval',- Requi~ed: 0x~''' Clty, Towfi Zo~in8 ~rd ~Y¢$ L~No City, Coun[y Health Department Other Local A~e~Cies ~Yes Other Re~;on~l A~encieS ~Yes Federal Agencies ~Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information Type , If Yet indicate decision requited: ~No 2, Wh~t is the zonin~ c}ns~ifica~ion{s)of the ~i'~ ..... ~.___~;q~ ......... -- 3. What is ~he ma<~mum p,4ent~i devetopmen~ o~ ~he site if developed a~permitted by ~he present zoning? 4. What i$ the proposed - 'n ' no ~Oal ,~ Of the ~;ie~ ........................ 7",',, 7, Wlnat ~re the p~edamin~n~ i~nd u~e(s] ~nd ~cnin~ c;~s~ificatlon~ within a '4 reda 8. Is fha proposed a¢tion c~mpatibIa wi~h ~djmnin~/surFou~din~ !~nd uses wi~hin 9. If the proposed action Is d~e subdivision of land, how many lot) ate proposed? _ 2 frora ), a. Wha{ i~ the mm~um lo: $;le propo~d? ~_~5 ~.__.~.~~ 10. W;t~ proposed action Cequl~e any author~zat~or,(s) ~o~ ti~e formation of ~¢w~r or water d~tricts? ~Ye$ 11.Will the proposed ~¢~;On Cre~i~ a demand far any ¢ommun,[y provided services fire protection)? ~Yes ~No o, If yes, t~ existln8 CapOCity su~flclent to hcnd~e prolected demand? D. Informatlonal Detail$ Attach any additional Information as may be needed to clarif~ you; prolog%. avoid them. E. Verification I cer~if,t that the lnt,)rm2tJon ptovid,~d above is true to the bes~ of ray knowledge. tl ..... ~.- --~ m, ~- ~ 2/7/93 DECLARATION OF COVI~NANT5 AND RESTRICTIONS THIS ~NDENTURI~ made this S~ f% day of ~l~;~/~,~a_ . 1993, by ANDPJ.~4 F. CASSID! and THO~IAS P. CASSIDY, as a~%orn, eys in fact for Herbe-~, O. Cassidy, Joan Corie, Thomas ~. Cassid¥, Ellen ?. Cassidy, Andrew F. Cassidy, Carole Cassid¥ and Andrew R. Cassidv, residinq a% !815 Albertson Lane, Greenoort, New York, here:i_nafter called the DECLARANTS. !4'rr~REAS, the Declarable are ~.he owners i~ fee simple of a certain parcel of land siauate at Greenport, To'wa of Southold, mount'¢ of Suffolk. State of Ne'¢ York, desiqnated on the ~ffolk County T~x Ymp as Dart of District. 1000, Sec;ion 52, BloCk 5, Lot 59.4 containinq aporoxiEately 4.5131 acres, beinq part of the sam, e premises acquired by %,he DECLA~'S by deed dated Auqust 19, 1986 and recorded in the Suff~ County ~ler~'s office on in Liter of Deeds at also ~dentified as Lot 1 on the Set off -~D for ~drew Cassid? & Sons, dated J~]ua~/ 20, 1993, prepared by Peco~,ic Suz~geyors, P-C., and referred to hereinafter~ as the the "premises" and ~LREAS, ~he Declarants intend to subdivide said premises for residential and '*-~ - Q~=zre to subject said premises to certain conditions, covenants and restr~c%~ in order to preserve the maxib%um open space, na~%~al scenic beauty ~nd natural veqetation and to prevent the overcrowdinq and to conserve the Qrour~d :cater resouftues of the Town of Southold, and I WH~AS, the Dec!arants nave ~pplied to the plam~inq Eoard of the To~¢n of Southold for a~pro%ql to set off 4.5131 acres frem 62.5829 acres, NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarants do hereby declare that the aforementioLed said Dre] and every portion thereof is hereby held and shall be conveyed subject, to the con~ covenants arid restrictions hereinafter set forth, and that every purc?~a~er of ssi, ises itions prarai£es or any portion thereof, by the acceptance of a deed thereto, covenants add JAMES A. KUZLOSKI REGIONAL DIRECTOR STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FRANKLIN E. WHITE COMMISSIONER March 9, 1993 Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Melissa Spiro, Dear Ms. Spiro: Planner Our Case No. 93-4~2 Proposed Submission Andrew Cassid¥ Route 25, GreeDort SCTM 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 Your March 2, 1993 Submission The subject material will be reviewed by Mr. J. Lentini of my staff. He can be contacted at (516) 360-6020 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Regional Traffic Engineer JOF: JL: JS EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACT/ON EMPLOYEff upon declarants, t~heir heirs, executors, legal representative~, distrihutees, successors, assigns and transferees. STATE OF NEW YORK) *SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ANDREW F. CASSlDY ,THOMAS p. CASSIDY On this ~ day of ~)9~34 , 1993, before me personally cama ~ndrew F. Caasidy and Thomas P. Cassidy, ko m~ }cnown ko he the individuals described herein and who executed the fora~oing ins=rt~ent and acknowledged that they executed same. Notary P~blib ARLENE J. TUTHILL NOTARY PLtBLIC;, S13t~ of New ¥oi No, ,t856450 - Suffolk Count~ Commission ~pi~eS, April 14, 19q~ JAMES A. KUZLOSKI REGIONAL DIRECTOR STATE Of New YORK DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY. 11788 FRANKLIN E. WHITE COMMISSIONER March 9, 1993 Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Melissa Spiro, Planner Dear Ms. Spiro: Our Case No. 93-4~2 Proposed Submission Andrew Cassid¥ Route 25, Greeport SCTM 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 Your March 2, 1993 Submission The subject material will be reviewed by Mr. J. Lentini of my staff. He can be contacted at (516) 360-6020 if you have any questions. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, JOF:JL:JS AIV EQUAL OPPORTUIV/TY/AFFIRMAT/VE ACT/OIV EMPLOYER SUBMISSION WITHOU? COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SC~4~: COr~MENTS: ~NNt~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards T¢ ephone {516) 76_ d938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTt L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 March 2, 1993 Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Set-off for Andrew Cassidy & Sons w/s Main Road and s/s Albertson's, Greenport SCTM~ 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 1, 1993. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this Type 1 action. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated January 20, 1993. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The final maps (five (5) paper prints and two (2) mylars) must contain a current stamp of Health Department approval, and must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. Page 2 Andrew Cassidy & Sons The Planning Board has referred this subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. You will be notified should any COvenants and restrictions be required. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman HENRY E. RAYNOR 320 LOVE LANE MATTITUEK, N.Y 11952 516-298-8420 FAX 516~298-2127 FEB. 11, 1993 TO: MELISSA SPlRO SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD RE: CASSIDY SETOFF ENCLOSED LIST OF OWNERSHIP IN THE ABOVE £APTIONED PROPERTY. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT T,~OMAS p. CASSIDY AND ANDREw F. (~-ASSIDY ARE ATTORNEYS IN FA£T FOR ALL THE PARTNERS 1N THIS FAMILY APPLICATION. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION~ AND ENUlROMENTAL FEE TO FOLLOW VIA MA~L. C AND RS FOR ~ r~ ~AR_~L TO HAvE NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION TO FOLL_D~ NEXT WEEK, AS EXECUTED BY THE ABOVE ATTORNEYS IN FACT, WILL BE FORTHCOMING. THANK YOu. SOU Mr. Herbert O. Cassidy R. F. D. 2, Box 656 Riverhead, N. y. 11901 Ms. Joan Corie Summit Avenue Northport, N. Y. 11768 Mr. Thomas p. Cassidy ~_est Mill Creek Drive Southold, N. Y. 11971 Ms. Ellen p. Cassidy 2110 La Mer Haslett, Michigan 48840 'z'U: Mr. Andrew F. Cassidy 1815 Albertson Lane Greenport, N. Y, 11944 Ms. Carole Cassldy Cassidy Lane Greenport, N. y. 11944 Mr. Andrew R. Cassidy 6 Hill Drive Port Jefferson, N. ¥. 11777 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 7654823 March 2, 1993 Vito F. Lena NYS Dept. of Transportation NYS Office Building Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed subdivision for Andrew Cassidy & Sons w/s NYS Rte. 25 and s/s Albertson's Lane Greenport, Town of $outhold SCTM~ 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 Dear Mr. Lena: The Planning Board has received an application to set-off a 4.51 acre parcel from the above mentioned 62.58 acre parcel. I have enclosed a copy of the map for your review because access to the proposed 4.51 acre parcel is from NYS Rte. 25. The 4.51 acre parcel is located in the Light Industrial (LI) District and the remainder of the property is zoned Residential R-80. The applicant will be recording a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions prohibiting any further subdivision of the LI property. Please submit any comments you have on the proposal to this office. Sincerely, Melissa Spiro Planner PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 1993 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: ~ ~q~ ~ C-~on5 ~Crn%~ tooo-~-5-s?.~ ~ ~?,~ Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: (~) Type I L~,..,~ ( ) Unlisted Contact Person: ~P_~l,~<o~ %,~0 (516)-765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (~) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below). Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further Sincerely, information. cc: ~card cf ApDcalc. ~Board of Trustees Bui!~ing'DcpartmenL Southold Town Board ~Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services ~NYSDEC Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany S.C. Dept. ef Public Worku U.S. Army~erp of Engineez~ ~N.Y.S. Dept. of Transportation * Maps are enclosed for your_review Coordinating agencies Richard G. Chairman Ward PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 ~arch 3, 1993 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Andrew Cassidy & Sons $CTM~1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 Dear Messrs. Cramer and Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. I have also enclosed the following: Map dated January 20, 1993; Planning Board resolution dated March 1, 1993; Letter dated February 11, 1993 from the applicant stating that a covenant and restriction will be recorded prohibiting further subdivision of the parcel to be set off. The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on March 1, 1993. The $400.00 review fee has been submitted by the applicant. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the April 12, 1993 public meeting. Please submit your report no later than April 2, 1993 in order for the Board to review it before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours, Planner Encls. .14-16 2 (2/871-- 7c - 617.21 ~[~i~" ~ , ' -~! State Environmental Quality Review ~H[.J; i i.~ FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORIV~ L_ .~ / Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orde~.~a~z~J'~hether-_a;p~oje¢~ or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- IV, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The fuji EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potential[v- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the 'impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF compleled for this project: [] Part 1 []' Part 2 [~Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the mag[rude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only vapid for Uqiisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Dhte PART 1--PROJECT INFORMA'I~ON Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A throu§h E. Answers to these questions will be considered. as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public rewew Prov de any additiona!~. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 2,. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such Jdditional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION dP ACTION (include SIreet Address, Municipality and County) BUSINESS TELEPHONE BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER (If different) ADORESS CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION : ..... i~ ~ :' ' ~¥;>'~ :<~-~ni:~ ;~ ~'~l'~. Please Complete Each Question- Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [~]Urban ~llndustrial ~Forest ~Agriculture 2. Total acreage of proiect area: ~?.~ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or grushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) *Wetland ~,Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other pave~ surfaces Other (indicate type)__ 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on proiect site? ho-~oi]., E3Commercial E]Other [~Residential (suburban) ~Rural (non-farm) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres ~ '~ a, Soil drainage: E]Well drained 7r? % of site E]Moderately well drained ~ rr ~ of site [~ Poorly drained ~ '~ ' % of site b.Landlf anYclassificationagricultural landsystem?iS involved,___hOWacres.many(seeaCresl NYCRR°i: soil are370),classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS{t 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? E]Yes F:INo a. What is depth to bedrock? '~ (in feet) 2 5. A!~aroximate percentage of proposed prolect site with slopes: []0-10% 100 % [10-15% % [15% or greater 6. Is proiect substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? []Yes [~No ~'7. ts project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ~]Yes ~]No 8. What is the depth of the water table? ~_9 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? []Yes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [Yes [~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant.or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [Z]Yes g:lNo According to ~.~0on ']~orm~ior~ .-~nct Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) I-lYes []No Describe 13. Is the proiect ~ite presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? []Yes ~]No If yes, explain , 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to b~ important to the commun []Yes E~No 15 Streams within or contiguous to project area: A.]F~hPI'aO~lnQL~e ~c, nc~, a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary . j~:~_l?_ 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) _ ~? 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? '~E~Yes [~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~2Yes ~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? I~Yes [No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law. Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~Yes 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 E~Yes [No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes [~No B. Project Description ° 1. Physical dimensions and scale of proiect (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor _ 62 b. Project acreage to be developed: ..... ~ . 5 acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped ~ acres· d. Length of project, in miles: _ (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure __ height;_ j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy~s? 3 acres. acres ultimately. (upon completion of project)? Multiple Family Condominium width; length. 500 ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? . C] tons/cubic yard~ 3. Will disturbed areas be rec aimed? I-lYes I-'INo [N/A a. If yes, for what intend.Z purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? r']Yes I-1No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I~Yes []No ( 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs ground covers) wilt be removed from site? F' acres. .5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project:~ []Yes []No ' 6. If single phase projec't: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-lyes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [Yes (No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project' 11. Will proiect require relocation of any projects or facilities? months, (including demolition). year, (including demolition). year. (No ; after project is complete [~Yes [3No If yes, explain . 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? []:]Yes f'lNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? (3Yes E]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain 15. Is project or any portion of proiect located in a 100 year flood plain? I--lYes [Yes ~No [~No 16 Will the project generate solid waste? []:]Yes [::]No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b, If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [Yes [No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain []Yes '~7. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? [Yes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [Yes fqNo 19. Will project routinely produce odd'ts (more than one hour per day)? [3Yes [~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the Focal ambient noise levels? [~Yes 21. Will proiect result in an increase in energy use? [Yes If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity - gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day n gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [3Yes [:]No If Yes, explain ~No 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board [Yes []]No City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes DNo City, Town Zoning Board fqYes [~No City, County Health Department 'DYes DNo Other Local Agencies E]Yes DNo Other Regional Agencie~ :il]Yes State Agencies ~lYes ~lNo Federal Agencies E]Yes [No Submittal Type Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~]Yes []]No · If Yes, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment ~]zoning variance Dspecial use permit [~]subdivision Dsite plan [~new/revision of master plan []]resource manaBement plan E~]other ~(~to ~ ~ 2. What is the zoning dassification(s}of the si~e? L.t. R-qO 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? r~o dh~nnqe 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? []lYes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~¼ mile radius of proposed action? L.I P,-~O, R-A0 [~No 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V~ mile? E3Yes I'qNo 91 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 2 from a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? gl .5 adz'es 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [[]Yes ~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services {recreation, education, police, fire protection)? []]]Yes 2~]No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? []Yes ENo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DYes ~]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [2]Yes O. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may he any adverse impacts associated with your proposal please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. ' E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. :A~l~1?~]ffi~/Spon,sqr Name Henry E. Raynor Date ?/?/?_____3 l!:[hke, La.Ctlon ,s in the Co/astal Area, and y~u area slate agency, complele the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding Part 2- AOJECT IMPACTS AND THEiR ,.,AGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. ( Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. Bui, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PAR.7- 2. Answer Yes if there will he any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold i~ lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentiaily large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigate.d by change(s) in the proiect to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? []NO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~ntinue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or ~bil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t,...,,y umque or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)D1NO r-]YES · Specific land forms: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Larqe Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] ElYes []No L-] [] []Yes []No [] [] E~Yes [~]No [] [] [:]Yes []No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Ves ~No I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765- 1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York II971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Anthony Volinski, Chief Greenport Fire District 3rd Street Greenport, New York 11944 Dear Mr. Vo~inski: Enclosed please find (2) surveys for Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by .~ -/o cooperation. · 1993. Thank you for your enc. Tf/ ' ;IP RD Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (5161 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOWl' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of - ~aace~ ~655;~ ~ ~,~ S.C.D.P.W. Topo No.: S.C. Tax Map No.: _~ - Major Sub. Minor Sub. MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Hamlet/Locality &ee~%, Zoning L,'~, - £ - 6Z 3 ~ Site Plan Cluster ..c ...... nary Plat (3 copies) /x Road Profiles Drainage Plans (1) __.Topogroaphical Map (1) (1) Site Plan (1) __ Grading Plan (1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: The project is an (Unlisted) T~-~ I~ (Type II)Action. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes)~. ' 4. The proposed division has received approval from the S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) ~. We reg~est aekno~ledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (No) Referral received 19 by Suffolk County Planning Commiss~-~n and assigned File NO. Very truly yours, Richard Ward Chairman Southold Town Planning Board .Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and' its referral to the Suffolk'County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Lathara. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S McDonald Kcnneth L. Edwards Telephone ( 516 / 765- 1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'IT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax {516) 765-1823 March 2, 1993 ttenry E. Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Set-off for Andrew Cassidy & Sons w/s Main Road and s/s Albertson's, Greenport SCTM~ 1000-52-5-59.3 & 59.4 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolutions were duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 1, 1993. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this Type 1 action. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated January 20, 1993. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of final maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The final maps (five {5) paper prints and two (2) mylars) must contain a current stamp of Health Department approval, and must be submitted before a final public hearing will be set. Page 2 Andrew Cassidy & Sons The Planning Board has referred this subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. You will be notified should any covenants and restrictions be required. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward Chairman HENRY E. RAYNOR 320 LOVE LANE MATTITUCK, N.Y 11952 516-298-8/,20 FAX 516-298-2127 FEB. 11, 1993 TO: MELISSA SPlRO SOUTNOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD RE: CASSIDY SETOFF ENCLOSED LI~T OF- OWNERC~HIP IN THE ABOVE CAPTIGNED PROPERTY. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT THOMAS P. CASSIDY AND ANDREw F. CASSIDY ARE ATTORNEYS IN FAC'[ FOR ALL THE PARTNERS IN THIS FAMILY APPLICATION. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION~ AND ENVIRO~"ENTAL FEE TO FOLLOW VIA MAIL. C AND RS FOR PARCEL TO HAve NO FURTHER SUBDIVISION TO FOLLOW NEXT WEEK, AS EXECUTED BY THE ABOVE ATTORNEYS IN FACT, WILL BE FORTHCOMING. THANK YOu. SOU Mr. Herbert O. Casstdy R. F. D. 2, Box 656 Riverhead, N. y. 11901 Ms. Joan Corte Summit Avenue Northport, N. Y. 11768 Mr. Thomas p. Cassidy ~sest Mill Creek Drive outhold, N. Y. 11971 Ms. Ellen p. Cassidy 2110 La Mer Haslett, Michigan 48840 Mr. Andrew F. Cassidy 1815 Albertson Lane Greenport, N. y. 11944 Ms. Carole Cassidy Cassidy Lane Greenport, N. Y. 11944 Mr. Andrew R. Caesidy 6 Hill D~ive Port Jefferson, N. ¥. 11777 14-1(~ 2 (2/87)-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FU LL ENVIRON MENTAL ASSESSM ENT aFnORN~'' Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in orde~~e~ a.project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby apphcants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full [AF [omponenls: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3, Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action, It provides guidance as to whether a~ impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced, Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 [:]Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared· [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared, * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency PrOd Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered..-- as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona!{. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3, It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. [f information requiring such ~dditional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION (include Street Address, Municipality ~nd County) NAME OF ~PPLfC~NT~'SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITY/PO ~ STATE ZIP CODE BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER (If different) ADDRESS CITY/PO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION STATE ZIP CODE Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [Urban I~lndustrial E]Forest DAgriculture 2. Yotal acreage of project area: ~'~_5 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) *Wetland !Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL] Water Surface Area Unvegetated {Rock, earth or fill) ~- Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other {Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? E~Commercial []Other E~Residential (suburban) E3 Rural {non-farm) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION a. Soil drainage: []Well drained 7~ % of site [Moderately well drained *T % of site [Poorly drained l.q _ % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See I NYCRR 370). ~' 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on proiect site? I-lYes E3No a. What is depth to bedrock? '~ (in feet) 2 5. Al~proximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ].0O % []10-15% % []15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? I~Yes ~No C7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [:3Yes []No 8. What is the depth of the water table? ".9 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? []Yes ~]~'No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes []No 11. Does project site co~tain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [~Yes [~]No According to t~t~on ~-n~orm~tio~ atn(fl ~el~e~ Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) C]Yes []No Describe 13. Is the project ,ite presentlV used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? If yes, explain ' 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to b~ important to the community? E~Yes [2]'No 1S Streams within or contiguous to project area: Ar~h~mom~c[ue Ponc~ a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary [~I;J_l! Crc,'~k 16. 17. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name Is the site served by existing public utilities? '~Yes ~lNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? b. Size (In acres) [3]Yes E~No I~Yes []No 17 18 Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? [~Yes :~]No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 [~Yes ]qNo O~k~o~ 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [~Yes [~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor (~')' -~ acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: /!.. 5 acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped ~ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed ?~er g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure_ height; width; __ length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare.project w I occupy:~S? 50,0 ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? [:]Yes [:]No I~N/A a. If yes, for what intend.~, purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for rec amation? [:]Yes [:]No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [:]Yes []No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? q acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? []:]Yes 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated {number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase I month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? []Yes [No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [Yes E3No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11, Will project require relocation of any projects or fac lities? [~Yes E~No If yes, explain tons/cubic yards year, {including demolition). year. 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes []No a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc,) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? []:]Yes [~]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain []:]Yes []No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [Yes 16 Will the proiect generate solid waste? [:]Yes []No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? I-lYes [qNo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain ~]No []--lyes f"iNo 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? [~Yes ~'JNo a. If VeS, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b, If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? []-lyes 19. Will project routinely produce odor~'(more than one hour per day)? E3Yes E3No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? []:]Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? []:]Yes []No If yes , indicate type{s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity . gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~ . gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? []:]Yes l~No If Yes, explain ~No 4 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board E~Yes []No City, Town, Village Planning Board [~Yes FqNo City, Town Zoning Board DYes []No City, County Health Department '[]Yes E~No Other Local Agencies DYes DNo Other Regional Agencie~ ~]Yes E3No State Agencies I~Yes DNo Federal Agencies []Yes iNn HufF. Cry ?. C C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? :~Yes I~No · If Yes, indicate decision required: [zoning amendment I~zoning variance [special use permit I-]subdivision Dsite plan r~new/revision of master plan Oresource management plan ~other s~-'to ~ E 2. What is the zoning ciassification(s)of the site? L.]~. Ii-qO 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? no chanqe S. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local [and use plans? E~'Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a V~ mile radius of proposed action? L.I P,-~O, R-qO DNo 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¥~ mile? r~Yes rqNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 2 from a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 4.5 acres 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? f-lYes l/No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? I~Yes "~] N o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [Yes iNn 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DYes :J~]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes ~lNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge· ~p'l~[~/Sp~ame He~ry E. Raynor Date 2/7/93 Signature- ~,/ with this assessment. 5 Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would t?igger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part'-'3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 auestions in PAR_T 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold i~ lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentiaily large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially Jarge impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? I~NO [qYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, {15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is ~xposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will c~3ntinue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t~...,,y umque or unusual land forms found on the s re? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)fiqNO I~YES · Specific land forms: 6 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [~]Yes ~'-~ No L--] [] []Yes [~]No [] [] ]~Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E~Yes ~]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No K 1.3 '~'"' ~ ~a.~ ........................... ' i HE~NR¥ Ej. RQYNOR !d~] T T I ~'UCK, N.Y T3: 5t]l ~THQ D TObJ",: PI AN;'~'I'qG FOR $,75J~.~E] FEE FOR SETOFF 0~' THIS A~:q'~'i ICATION FUR APPRE~VAI. DF THIS PL.E~SE SCHEDULE F']R TIIF EA~ IFCT [:'OSSIBU DPTF~ cb Ci~L D YOU HAVE ANY ~t)E?T!C~N~ P~ EASE CONTAC] THAN~4 YOU cOR YOUR ATTENTIE]N IN ]HIS ~nT SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: COMMENTS: 1i11 SEP I 8 1992 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Halk 53095 Main Road P.O, Box 1179 Southold. New York II971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: RE: Southold Town Board Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman~.~ Members of the Planning Board . Cassidy Property W/s State Route 25, S/o Albertson Lane, Greenport, N.Y. SCTM g 1000-52-59.3 and 59.4 DATE: October 5, 1992 The Planning Board urges the Town Board to follow the reconmmendation of the Town's Land Preservation Conunittee that the Cassidy property be acquired with the Town's Open Space monies. The Planning Board finds that this 65 acre property would be an ideal addition to the Town's open space holdings for the following reasons: The scenic views of Hashomomaque Pond provided by the property in this immediate area is argueably one that could be enjoyed by anyone whether they be a resident or a tourist. o Acquisition of this property would provide for enhanced public access to Hashomomaque Pond. At this time, Hashomomaque Pond is unaccessible other than by two or three road endings, and the bridge on SR 25. The railroad bridge is used to gain access also, but, all too often with tragic results. This particular property is one of the most accessible pieces due to its ~rontage on both SR 25 and Albertson Lane. Thus public access could be provided here with little or no impact on the neighboring residents. If this were to be purchased, the proposal to remove the dikes and restore the wetlands could only enhance the ecological health of the Pond, which is one of the Town's most productive shellfishing areas. Given the known impacts of development, preservation of this parcel would help keep Hashomomaque Pond viable for shellfishing. In sum, this parcel is a prime example of the type of property that the Open Space monies were intended for. Accordingly, we heartily endorse the Land Preservation Committee's recommendation that this parcel be purchased with the Open Space monies. The attached copies of the tax map and aerial photograph have been marked for your convenience. cc: Land Preservation Committee, Southold Board of Trustees, Southold Conservation Advisory Council, Southold James McMahon, Community Development Office To: From: Re: TOYTiY OF SOUTItOLD LAND PRESERVATION COMMITTEE Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 · I August 26, 1992 Southold Town Board Art Ross, Chairman, Land Preservation Committee Land Preservation - Cassidy Property - Open Space Tax Map 1000-52-5-59.3 & 1000-52-5-59.4 --~'ei. 765-1801 RECEIVED 2 6 992 So.thc~/~l 'r ..... At our meeting of August 18, 1992, the Committee reviewed the appraisal of this parcel by Richard A. Winters, dated July 27, 1992, which fixed the fair market value at $500,000. The Committee voted to recommend acquisition of this land for Open Space by the Town Board. I am sending this report to you now, rather than wait for the meeting . minutes, because of the concerns expressed by the Town Board during its consideration of the Cassidy proposal at the Executive Session on July 14, 1992. If the Committee can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to call on US. · .cc: Land Preservation Committee Members SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER SENDER: SUBJECT: SCTM~: COMMENTS: vzco ..c TRUST Scott L. Harris, SuPervisor Southold Town Board Members Town of Southold P.O. Box t 179 Southold, New York 11971 July 21,1992 Re: Cassidy Property Dear Supervisor Harris and Southold Town Board Members: I would like to thank ~,0u for taking the time to meet wifli'Timothy Caufield and me on Tuesday, July 14th, ' As we stated in our meeting, we believe that the Cassidy property is an ideal prospect for acquisition by the Town of Southold. It is worthy of your careful consideration. In light of our discussions last week, we recommend ~at the Town negotiate a "bargain sale" directly with the Cassidy Family. '~ This potential acquisition represents a rare opPortunity to protect a property which can pr. ovide a wide variety ofpttblic benefits: 1) the natural diversity of the pr°~e, rty (wetlands, woodlands and 6pen fields) can provide significant benefits as waterfowl and wildlife habitat; 2) restoration of the wetland portion of the property offers the' oppormniiy to revitalize significant tidal wetlands and provide water quality benefits to · Hashamomuck Pond (one of the town's most productive creeks). 3) the property lends itself to public access with frontage on a public ro'ad and public waters; We believe this acquisition can be justified to town residents on its own merits. It is all the more justifiable given the possibility of acquiring and restoring the property at below fair market value. Please let me know-if the Trust can provide any further clarification or assistance in this regard. We continue to be interested in the restoration of the site given the unique opportunity it provides. Thank you very much. Sincerely, cc: T. Cassidy John v.H. Halsey President L DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS THIS INDENTURE made this~ day of ~ , 1993 by ANDREW F. CASSIDY AND THOMAS P. CASSIDY, as attorneys in fact for Herbert O. Cassidy, Joan Corie, Thomas p. Cassidy, Ellen P. Cassidy, Andrew F. Cassidy, Carole Cassidy and Andrew R. Cassidy, residing at 1815 Albertson Lane, Greenport, New York, hereinafter called the DECLARANTS. WHEREAS, the Declarants are the owners in fee simple of a certain parcel of land situate at Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York, designated on the Suffolk County Tax b6~0Map as District 1000, Section 52, Block 5, Lot 59.4 containing approximately 62.5829 acres, being the same premises acquired h _~y t e DECLARANTS by dee~ da ted ~w%l ~))~ and recerded in m~lthe Suffolk County Cleft s Office on ~ / ~11~ in Liber ~ Deeds at page ~1 and referred to hereinafter as the "premises" and WHEREAS, the Declarants intend to subdivide said premises for residential purposes and desire to subject said premises to certain conditions, covenants and restrictions in order to preserve the maximum open space, natural scenic beauty and natural vegetation and to prevent the overcrowding and to conserve the ground water resources of the Town of Southold, and WHEREAS, the Declarants have applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval to set off 4.5131 acres from 62.5829 acres, /. OW, THEREFORE, the Declarants do hereby declare that the aforementioned aid premises and every portion thereof is hereby held and shall be onveyed subject to the conditions, covenants, and restrictions // hereinafter set forth, and that every purchaser of said premises // or any portion thereof, by the acceptance of a deed thereto, covenants / . and agrees that the premises shall be held subject to the covenants, conditions and restrictions hereinafter set forth. o Ail stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of this subdivision or any of its lots shall be retained on the site by adequate drainage structures so that it will not flow into the right-of-way of Main Road (S.R. 25). A buffer area in compliances with the minimum standards of Section 100=213 of the Southold Town Code will be required prior to the issuance of any building permit for Lot Number 1. A landscaped strip in. compliance with the minimum standards of Section 200-212 of the Southold Town Code will be required prior to the issuance of any building permit for Lot Number 1. There shall be no further subdivision of Lot Number 1 in perpetuity. Lot Number 2 shall not be subdivided or its lot changed in any manner at any future date unless by the Town of Southold Planning Board. lines authorized That all Of the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained herein shall be construed as real covenants running with the land and shall continue and remain in full force and effect at all times as against the owner of the premises or any portion thereof in perpetuity. Said covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be binding upon, inure to the benfit of and be enforceable by. the Declarant, their heirs, successors and assigns, and the Town of Southold and its successors and assigns, and the failure of any of the foregoing to enforce any of such covenants, conditions and restrictions shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be requird. The Declarants grant the continuing right in perpetuity to the Town of Southold or any of its designated representatives to inspect any areas designated open space, common areas or similar nomenclature so as to insure continued compliance with the covenants, terms and provisions designated herein in regard to same and to insure that such covenants, terms and provisions have not been violated. The Declarants grant the continuing right in perpetuity to the Town of Southold or any of its designated representatives to enforce the conditions and restrictions of the covenants as they relate to the open space, common area or nomenclature and to take any legal action it deems necessary to enforce the conditions and restrictions of the covenants. These rights of inspection and enforcement shall be binding upon declarants, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors, assigns and transferees. STATE OF NEW YORK) .ss: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ANDREW F. CA~S~IDY . ~ THOMAS P. CASSIDY ~ On this ~H day of ~ , 1993, before me personally came Andrew F. Cassidy and Thomas P. Cassidy, to me known to be the individuals described herein and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed same. NOTARY PUBLIC ARLENE 3, TUTHILL NOTARY PUBLIC, State o! New Yor No. 4856450 - Suffolk County Commission Expires. April 14, 19ct~ ~o I ~ ~ POND SETFOR OFF MAP ANDREWA TCASS/D YGREENPORT& SONS., TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HAS BEEN APPROVED BY'THE PLA~S BOARD OF 1 I - ~ -~ ~ // '~ i/ 1815 ALBERTSON LANE I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ~AS MADE BY US GRE~ORT, N.Y. FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS COMPLETED z//+l~ AND THAT SHQFN THUS, · HEREON ACTUALLY ALL MONUMENTS ~ ~-o~'oo' ~. LONG ISLAND ---~E ........... ROAD-' - KEY MAI= $omle: I'%8oo' (516) 765 - 50~-0 P. O. BoX 909 / MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. ,' THE WA TER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS & REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUEFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEAL TH. T YP/CA L ~ . ' ~. SI TE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ~ -~ ~' ~;~x - , , ,, KEY MAP ~ Sc~: 1'~ 6~' ~ ~ "~ ~. %' ; C~N~ ~P~.~.H~TH SE~~ POND in eff~ ~ the fl . ~ ~ _.~ ._~ ,~ ~v~ shall ~ v~ only In the ~ ~ p~ is d~y fi~ with the ~'~-~' · ~ ~. ~ is hereby ~ve which IN~ endorBe~ al~e~ in Gse (:~ce / SET OFF MAP FOR ANDREW CASS/DY & SONS SUFFOLK COUNTS N K I000- 52- 0~- 59.3 & 59.4 Scale: 1"= I00' J~. 15, 1993 / ~// , .,'.~ , . / xx ~. , T~$ IS TO CERTIFY TWA[ THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS SEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANN~G 80ARD ~ I , r'. /'~----~' ,¢N~ ( ~ .... -. ~..~ ....... /o .... __/. TEST BORING THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BY RESOLUTION OF I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US ~ FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS CCMP~ETED ///+,,, AND THAT ~ ALL MONUMENTS SHO~N TRUe. · HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONE ~RE CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND G~TIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT. JOd~ T. MET~G~.Y.& LIC. NO, 49618 OWNER ANDREW CASS/DY I815 ALBERTSONoRT, N.Y. LANE , OPOGRAPHICAL INFORMA nON ~OM RVE EASTERN TOWNS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ¢ , :, AREAS / LOT/= 4.5131Acres LOT2 = [8.0698Acres TOTAL AREA- ' '¢ 62.5829 Acres ~UG s LONG ISLAND - ~AIL' SEP 1 3 1994 BOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNIN8 BOARD THE RATER SUPPLY AND SEF/AGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPL Y lC/TH THE STANDARDS ~ REOUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK ~COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEAL TH. ZONING DISTRICTS, L.I. I & R 80 OWNER, ANDREW CASADY 1~5 ALBERTSON LANE GREENPOR~ ~ TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMA T/ON FROM FiVE EASTERN TOWNS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP AREAS LOT I = LOT 2 = 4.5131Acres 58. 0698 Acres FINISHED GRADE T YPICA L 7' '%a, GE DISPOSAL S'dS TEM SET OFF MAP FOR ANDREW CASSIDY & AT GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y. 1000 - 52 - 05 - §9.3 & 59.4 Scale: I"= 100' Jan. 15, 1993 Jan. 20, 1993 8/3/93 TOTAL AREA= , ,~ 62.5829 Acres ,~,0u ¢5¢F¢ ' DA TE REVISION TEST BORING ADDED · A TER MAIN THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BY RESGLUTION OF APPROVAL DA TED' BY DA TE CHAIRMAN PLANNING BOARD I HERBY CERTIFY THAT THI~ MAP F/AS MADE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS CDMPLETED ///'H~3 AND THAT ALL MONUMENTS SHOFIN THUB, I~ HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITION~,;~'E CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND G~O~TIC DETAILS A'RE CORRECT. JOl~i~! T,,MET~G~I.y.S, L/C, NO,'49615 ,~t I I TEST BORING '-. ---- i /919.35' LONG ISLAND - - -~-' "~I~AIL ........... ROAD KEY MAP Scale: r'.-- 600' 3.5 / ~ \ // / -- .__ -' ~.0 "'% 340.65' SEP 1,31994 THE I~A TER SUPPLY AND SE~'AGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS & REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEAL TH. ZONING DISTRICTS~ L,I. OWNER. ANDREW CASSIDY I815 ALBERTSON LANE GREENPORT, N. Y, 4' PVC P/N/SHED GRADE LEACH~S POOL TYPICAL '-' 'v,'zt,qE DISPOSAL. SET OFF MAP FOR ANDREW CASSlDY & A T GREENPORT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y. ,i S YS TEA,: SITE ~DDED THIS IS TO C~RTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED BY'THE PLANNING BOARD OF ~ ~ ~ /// .r ~ '~ ~ ~~'~5~N~. //' ' '-~ TEST BORING THE TOEN OF SOUTHOLD BY R~SOLUTION OF ~ ( "~ ' " APPROVAL BATED' EXIST AND THEIR POSITION8 ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN AND ' EASTERN TO,NS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP f~ , O~ LOT I = 4.5131Acres LOT 2 = 58.0698 Acres - -~ ~' . P. O, .... .." MAIN ROAD S 55'01'00' E. LONG ISLAND ---~IL- ........... ROAD- ~,, ,~ TEST B~IN' AD~O 4'~2'93 SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971