The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-50.-6-4 _ � � �rr?C,� , � ;'; , , �, 1 �' �r�;�, ' � �� , � € _ � PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �5 �' ;t -"' SCOTI' L. HARRIS � ; , a Bennett Odowski, Jr., Chairtnan � � ` � �,� .� ,e� ^ George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ��-f�'�. '��;.�;�� . Supervisor � � Richard G. Ward � "� �r ��'�y � ^c_:�zc:��`� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York I I971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-I93R TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 17, 1993 Sanford Hanauer 130 Woodbury Road Woodbury, New York ill97 RE: Hanauer and Bagley Property S/s Sound View Ave. and W/s Lighthouse Road, Southold SCTM# 1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Hanauer: The file for the two lot pending, subdivision application for the above mentioned property has been closed in accordance with the officeaof�thefCountyaClerknonRJunei$ti1993W(Liber�11632edpaQethe 635) . The Declaration includes a statement that the premises shall constitute one (1) building lot and shall not be further subdivided. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, i JaG�W�/�' '6`• !�/R'.i�D!'�f Richard G. Ward Chairman _ � � , ,K.R. �y � r(�� @, 3�a5l�-�+, .. ;, � ,. � � � AIN'ING LV IVii��V��VI\�.Y . -, � ' �v___. � _ � 1I632�s35 .�`� � � • DBQ,�gATION OF OOVS�NTS �p x�^rxrcr=oxs��; FEL 2 fi !� �--:�----�_ DECLARATION _'Y"'"'.;--"' �... made this 22 day og February, 1993, by Si7E^ . HANAUER, residing at 130 Woodbur �/�G� Nassau Y Road, Woodbury, County of �S"L�Lc�} �Ypress D ive of New York, and JOAN BAGLEY, residing at 95 ' . Woodhury� County of Nassau, State of New York �tnl:C}C hereinafter collectivel �� Y referred to as the ��Declarant��, , � _ �E�S. the Declarant "`'�= certain is the owrier in fee sim r � Aarcel of land situated Ple �f a �� Avenue at Lighthouse Road and Soundview , Southold, Town ag Southold �'� ' , Count -"= _� of New York, desi Y of Suffolk and State ,��'�) ynated on the Suffolk Count � /(�/f��'strict 1000, Section 50 Y Tax Map as i � . B1oCk 6, LOt 4 + d scription of w � a metes and bounds � � � � hich is shown on Schedule ��A�� annexed hereto and 1 S �, made a part hereof, , � hereinaPter referred to as the ��premises", , �}+J NOW, THgREFORE� Declarant aPoresaid does hereby declare that the �GS "�• � Premises and ever Y portion thereof is hereby held and ��;�c- p� shall be conveyed aubject to c.�L'� .? restrictions the conditions, covenants and � hereinafter set forth, and that �'C � said Premises every purchaser of I or any pprtion thereof, by the acceptance of � deed � thereto, covenants and ' a :/ `. purchased $gre� that the Premises so shall be held sub � restrictions �ect to the covenants, conditio hereinafter set forth. ns and 1• The Premises hereinafter described shall constitute °ne (1) building lot and shall not be further subdivided. �(J L � � � 6 � � d�;��16 _ � � � - �Nd ( 5 1993 . ` ��. . .; ' � � SOUTHOLD TOWN'�� ' - ` PLANNING BOARU � c�vEFOI�-�, � ,�ti�ic.c-' � � M 5 - �^'y- . RAYMOND L. JACOBS � � JAMES A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF � `� ENGINEERZNG AIGHWAYS 'f.�! �� INSPECTOR � 765-3140 765-30I0 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JUNE 17, 1991 Mr. Raymond L. Jacobs Superintendent of Highways Town of Southold Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 RE: Joan Bagley/Sue Hanauer Property S.C.T.M. �/ 1000 - 50 - 6 - 4 Dear Mr. Jacobs: As per your request, I have reviewed the drainage situation at the intersection of Lighthouse Road and Soundview Avenue. A copy of my memo to you dated 1/30/91 regarding the adjacent Bitses property is enclosed for your reference. Also enclosed is a letter from the Town Trustees concerning Mr. Bitses application to construct a "Flood Gate" on the North side of the road. The parcel of land indicated above is located directly to the south of the intersection. A major portion of this parcel is considered to be Fresh Water Wetlands. The major concern of the Owners, as I understand it, is that road runaEf is entering their pond from the adjacent streeta and contaminating the�r pond. It has also been stated that the culvert below soundview avenue, (which . allows the two ponds to achieve equilibrium) , is also adding to the contamination. It is true that road runoEf does make its way into both ponds. However, it is also true that this pond is the low point in an area which acts as a drain for the surrounding +/- 50 acres. The pond on both sides of the road is acting as a natural recharge basin for the entire area. A recent letter that you have received from Mr. Irving Like, who is the attorney for the Owners of the above referenced property, states that the Town is responsible for the "Defective design, construction and maintenance of the road and drainage facilities". This statement, in my opinion, is not very acurate. Soundview Avenue was dedicated to the Town in the year 1914. The design criteria of the times would have probably been to use whatever natural drainage areas that were available. Recent aerialsurvey mapa clearly show that before the road was built, the two ponds on both sides of Soundview Avenue were connected. Therefore, any reference to the connections of the two ponds by way of a culvert would be, in my opinion, irrelevant. cont. ' Jlp., 11991 � ��g�FFO(� �. � � RAYMOND L. JACOBS tgi � JAMES A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF � � ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS 'j.yol ,�1yQ� INSPECTOR � 765-3140 765-30I0 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Raymond L. Jacobs JUNE 17,1991 Page 2 of 2 The road runoff that is directly entering the ponds, although somewhat undesirable in an environmentally concious world, is an existing situation that has existed for at least 75 Years. The Fresh Water Pond on both sides of the road seems to be thriving as it always has. Without data to document the levels of suspected contamination, that may or may not exist, it would be premature to even discuss possible alternatives. A meeting has been requested by Mr. Hanauer through Mr. Likes letter dated 6/10/91. Please feel free to schedule this meeting at your convenience. I will be glad to meet with you and Mr. Hanauer to discuss this matter. If you have any questions concerning the above, Please feel free to contact my office. incerely t James A. Richter, R.A. ENC:" cc:- Matt Kieman Assistant Town Attorney - John M. Bredmeyer, III President-Board of Tru ees - Bennett Orlowaki, Jr. � Chairman-Planning Board _ _ _ - _, _ 1 _ ____ � � � rr � t�� r��1�'�li�I+` _ .i` �J " t �� '' + �i K � �� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS � � c N;: rn SCOTT L. HARRIS V'� I }' N Bennett Odowski, Jr., Chairman � °tr iy�^ ."`�� :�$' o� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. � '9� �`�� ` Richard G. Ward �'�.�+" '1 >>� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York I 1971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTFIOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: All Involved Agencies FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman�nd✓y�s � ✓` �✓ RE: Scoping Session for Hanauer and Bagley SCTM#1000-50-6-4 DATE: June 19, 1991 , A Scoping Session has been set for 3 P.M. , Tuesday, July 2, 1991, for the above mentioned subdivision application. The meeting will be held in the conference room of the Town Hall which is located on the Main Road in Southold. A copy of the Positive Declaration may have been sent to you on May 23, 1989. Another copy is enclosed with this letter for your convenience. If you are unable to attend the Scopinq Session, please send any comments you may have as to items you wish addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, to the Planning Board office. The Board' s facsimile number is 765-1823. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Board office at 765-1938. Encl. cc: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Harvey A. Arnoff, Town Attorney Matthew G. Kiernan, Assistant Town Attorney Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, Board of Town Trustees Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent James Richter, Road Inspector John Holzaphel, Conservation Advisory Council Vito Minei, Director, Office of Ecology, SCDHS Robert DeLuca, Office of Ecology, SCHDS Louise Harrison, Office of Ecology, SCHDS Stephen Costa, Suffolk County Department of Health Services Frank Dowling, Suffolk County Department of Planning Walter C. Hazlitt, Exec. Director, SC Water Authority . ' � � ; Thomas Jorling, NYSDEC Albany David Morrell, NYSDEC, SUNY Stony Brook Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Sanford Hanauer, Applicant Joan Bagley, Applicant Irving Like, Attorney . ._ ... . . '^^-_m"^'^"_ _ .--� ,,,�„�...-,;t,� . _. � . :<c� , v - , _ __ _ ___ _ ' � � ;,� ... � � . � _ � �1 �.� Town Hall. 53095 lbfain Road `' >' ' P.O. Box 1179 ,.'n, .''`� .�r'.,` Southold, New York 1 1971 " � � TELEPHONE J (5I6) 765�1936 . PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 05/23/89 POSITIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conserva�ion Law _ State _Environm�ntal Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR part 617, Section 617.10 and chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency for this unlisted action described below has determined that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. NAME OF ACTION: ' Sue Hanauer and Joan Bagley SCTM $1000-50-6-4. SEQR STATUS• Type I . Unlisted V DESCRIPTION OF ACTION• Applicant proposes to subdivide a 4. 945 acre parcel into 2 lots, 2. 466 acres and 2. 479 acres respectively. This parcel is zoned A-C (Agricultural Conservation) . It is located on Sound View Avenue at Southold. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: The Planning Board has reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment Form, has completed Parts II and I22, and has conducted a field Inspection of the site. Based on the above, the Planning Board has determined that: The proposed action has the potential of having a significant impact to the physical characteristics of the � project site. . There may be an effect on the existing freshwater pond and CONTIC]UED . _ _ . " � * wetlands on the site due to the proximity of the proposed� construction. The proposed action will involve construction within the required setback from a freshwater body. There may be an effect on the existing freshwater pond and wetlands on the site due to the fact that the proposal includes private wells within 70 feet and individual sewage disposal systems within 100 feet. The upland area of the subject premises does not meet the minimum lot area requirement for two dwellings. CONTACT PERSON Further information can be obtained by contacting Jill M. Thorp, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk county Planning Commission Robert Greene, DEC Commissioner Mohabir Perseud, Department of State Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. James Schondebare, Town Attorney Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Applicant Planning Board . • ' � ` , - ; - 4 \ � \� � �.:_ _-_�_:_ , , , , �;,_ �- � b� ��-; -, _ _ _ b _ -� � � i , ,/ �/ � � � / , \ 4 i � i .�,° � .�`F.� =�;�� ,4 � � �! j�✓o-- 1 I � � ' /P�` ,.. 4�bh � � V 1 I / °,��at�e 90� \/C�(� 1 1 1.. ��.:�`Gi i'/ \ . .. S9 Y \ � ��`MG�i��•` I / \ 1� \ � //i ?a '/ \ ��`'. //��n�OVs N \ � ��s+ \ � �� o' � � . �e �\ �� +� � �� i:�� '^� \ � � \ - \ `�/ /, u, \� \I � � � �� i oW t � � � .° F' ,�iao° � `,� ` �` n \ � So�NO��<<bo;3?, e 1�. \ \ ..a�` \ � ' _ � ��.�'�,�, �� Np °`, � I � � � ' ' �„J\�f � ` e� . � •� � �, � -'Q� . J `, t � � ' ;" � �i� ' � 's 90; ,a S�6 e �I,T \ � _ �"�\', � � � � 1�: � �Gl%�2. I 9`� <y ' x�:1 1 1 1��' � �o/fCJs� `{�'`i��. ` -" � . � � � _ O . 9 \ � T � �� \ 1 `` � o �,- i'�n F'^ �;,> c° , .:.;..�, , � � , ` G'2��%r %J^'O�°.. D � 1¢"�` , �a�.�.`i , � �l \ "��4�il I�i 1c � t � •• ��p,-p I1 r��a, � oP o o t P �1 L/� ti , �oo°'�z`4 �i �'i �• `,' , \ � '�bv o°. �.`� ,J� . �,o\P6P �9'�" \f�. �' q{4 '� ` y_ "✓' '� i � �I I� �\t,\ � P pOo � vC.. :•':: � / � 3 ,1 1 ,•• �` ��P f�P� j ; , t :.� �o"I � \ /�Y \ `\ �\� 66 pc`;y` P� �� 1�'�N~�/ \~�y> \ � .l �✓�/ � �� P p�° � � \ p /� � �' � \ \ �O ` Y \� h,,0" \ \ . \ ` �/ / \ \40 � �dJ�?O C / \ ��el/ . . �LwE CF JAESHNAiER Y.FTL>rv05 GS p rset�j�o\rrv.consu..en*s.i•K\'C�o� _ , S19�a �Q "m' �\ ./� a� � \ Pl � "�pG. il '�P, � _ � � � P �rL VS �_eo— � iES�MOIE 0-1 TFST MOLE B-2 _CO'� 1. I P,c� \ `°i"Y � � ';�.!� pp �f P��C 1� ' y /),QpY1 ,�¢ �� ^ �\ S �, "Pr I1\�'` `N / / \ I � _�a P4P' �JT ��r�/ �e � ` /9,E ,4+�' � .b ,/a�. � °�� /.•� norc_ � � 1 r�'" es° °° �.i �.:,.a.�ME�, . y�� 2.SUFfO�It CpUNTI �n�. .e�n�. \ � /t .✓j �.S . oist.iaoo scn: I •' 3.TOTGL 4PEP =0 f � / � � [IEWTqN4 1PE R vo ��J no '0 5 ELEV4TION5 SIp11N TXVS:___�8--- �P , 6 CON1ClIFS SWwx � ✓ �l. \ �TOqGfl�M6 Mu � � �� TME SUFlQK CW� TNE W�TEP 9UPGL�GNO SFWG4E pY05A PG[IL�TIES fCfl GL� LpTS IN TMIS�FVFIDYMENT� \ = � COMPLY WITNTIE ST�NpLRO]�NpREOUIfl[MtMT50f TN[SI�fiOLR�WNi�OtMNlMCNi�lqE�UM `� - .r......, .�.�... �, _ �wweno w.ip�nc. s ��¢nu�Se9� \ `�� — ��T:='"=--� i � . �MINOR SUACIYISION PLAN FOF — � — •�. i . �SUE HANAUER B JOAN BAGLE _ ./; I�.. �.:+ . . ' '. �Ii ' • , , n* sou,Hao . ',. ' I r � . ' ,,.••,, , . rov�.c� sourno�o ,�'. . . . � .. . . , . • , . SV�fOIN COIIN�Y. NEV �pq✓ ... __ . ._... _ _ . ... . . . _ ... .� _ Y . . . � __... _— _ _ ._ . . . v--.. ._ " % � � �eu�o � �no �.- .s-� .o.o _ _ - _-_ � �/ \ ' ' _" _ _- _' � �—_ � -- � fa E � 4 �: � _ .\ \ -W- •�+c� �� . 1 �^ 1 .`Y� i — �� ,,. , ;�: '`, s -- , 9 ti,, .«�� , ,e y �_ . e � -�— a ��°O•. O(/ \ y,,.o .� � �'" \�� • � F s� • I ,� - • � . � � i , �, s � � — �� . �� _ � �� \ 'j - �� \ � ` \ LOC4TION n�no � — � � I � � ♦ \ SCALE: I��=600' — �`• `� \ � ' \ � '— i� � ♦ ` ^` I �� ♦ � � �` — � 1 ' � °�, \ I . - � ♦ \ \ 1 - \ J ` _ � \ � ��`� � � I ��+ I �\ \ \ I ;�O g'�` __=. � � .n 4�04r�� I �r_ \� ,1 � � p�S YO: �P°°y�s � � � 1 1 1�a� '�` gr:_� I rr � t 1 A��\e.� \ � ' � I 1 � � � I �� 1 1 � yi Q9 � wn� 1 1 \I I - p,c� 1 ' � o?i°. 1.. � 1� \ 7� ` � � 19 t� � :! o� 1 � >,�" >. � •= 2 �, go��5t* �, .i gt � � `��T'c%'� � I ��_� � y� 0 3 .`e � � y . � I . o� P ,s, . �. G i.it.+�'' � \ — �' pQ' �O W� I a�a'.e� 4./ce�,� � I _ p`' e� �� ::�s; � E�°� � I �'� oF �,P � '` ° � � — JQ i \i oe�. i I � _ TF.p'OQ I '� �p� �yE"l �i -- PF.p' � � � I I - — ' i � p 9a I � .� ' ,yo '�' i -_ /� 29 � � / � � / � f— \p \ � _az� _ .. � �N� / � _ � � j � .\�e � ��., _ J � I _�yCJ — SO� I " \ — C�' : . � p' — r° � ' �� /�� 4�e�� ,o / / ^ \\ . _ e� / 4 _:._ i D V� 0(I � � �•'y1' .� ae NOTE: � ayy�o CO \ ` / � I.i- MONUMENT Q:LATN � 2.SUPFOLK COUNTYTAX MAP � �_, . . DIST. 1000 SECT.50 BLK.6 L0T9 3.TOTAL AR E A =4.9q5 lICRES � � 4. ELEVaTqNS pRE REFERENCED TO NGVD. (MSL 929) 3 ELEVATIONS 51qWN THUS+4T.q ANO CONTOURS SXOWN THUS�---48--- qRE FROM ACTUAL SURVET. 6 CONTOURS SHOWN TXUS�—=�B--ApE FROA1 �— ��TOPOCRAPHIC M4V•5 EASTERN TOWNS��PREPPRED FOR � THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF PUBLIC WOqKS. `�iiLi ! � fSO�,n:,: _.'___. " Pi n,: -__�__" iMINOR SUBDIVISION P�AN FOR !SUE HANAUER 9 JOAN BAGLEY i i NOV 22.1988 i �. 4UG. 2,1988 - I AT $OUTHOL� OeiE JULY �5, 19B8 _ � i �wH � DEC. 23�B87 ' SOUTHOLD sc•�c i":so .�`... �� I SU�FOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Mo 87 -2025 �i'r.. ( '.. •' � .... � ..� � - "" " ._ .__. __. -. .._. ... .... .... � //• � t� ' r�`'r _ . ._ �. . . / � � .S�u3Fi�" ` REILLY, LIKE & TENETY ��a3 wrrowvEvswTuw ��j 200 wEST MnIN STREEC �xvnva u�m P.O.BOX 218 BE��•��'�'Y BABYLON,NEW YORK 11702 viNcexr c�venr (sis��3000 FAX(516)669�122 °F� June 5, 1991 JOSEPH H.MeSPEDON Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.�. Ba�it 11;3` Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application for Variance Hanauer and Bagley SCTM f1000-50-6-4 Gentlemen: We represent Hanauer and Bagley on thair application for a variance under Section 100-239 of t,he Zoning Code in the proposed minor subdivision into two lots, which is pending with the Southold Town Planning Board and Suffolk County Health Department. Enclosed is a copy of a letter dated May 22, 1991 from the Board of Appeals. In accordance with its directions, I am herewith notifying you that our client intends to proceed under the coordinated SEQRA review, and requests a Scoping Session at your earliest possible date. ��r:z;� �ruly your�, RE , LIKE, TEN AMBROSINO IL:ch IRV G LIK Encl. - cc: Southold Board of Appeals Sanford Hanauer JU�I — 6 i991 'h• . . (� �'�'� 2 41g91 }yo��gUfFO(�� °y�,� APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS �o '� � SCOTT L.HARRIS '� W A1 Y SUPCLV1SOf Gerard P.Gcehringer,Chairman "�y� � O�'F� Chatles Grigonis,Jr. � Oj � .�,`a,.'%� Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen,Jt. ��,;J r P.O.Boz 1179 James Dinizio, Jr. SouUtold,New York 11971 Robert A. Villa BOARD OF APPEALS Faz(516)765-1823 Telephone(516)765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone(516)765-1800 May 22, 1991 Irving Like, Esq. Reilly, Like & Tenety 200 West Main Street P.O. Box 218 Babylon, NY 11702 Re: Application for Variance ��N '- s 1991 Hanauer & Bagley 1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Like: This will confirm that we are in receipt of your recent application for a variance under Section 100-239 of the Zoning Code in the proposed minor subdivision into two lots, which is pending with the Southold Town Planning Board and Suffolk County Health Department. Pursuant to the requirements of the N.Y.Y. Environmental Quality Review Act, Part 617, Sections 617. 3, the Board of Appeals has notified the Planning Board, as lead agency in this project, that an application for an area variance has been filed and that the Planning Board, together with the applicants, should proceed with a Scoping Session as part of the requirements for preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. In accordance with the requirements of SEQRA, the area variance is being held in abeyance, however, the Board of Appeals will, of course, participate as an involved agency in assisting the lead agency in the preparation of a scoping checklist and areas of concern. You are requested to coordinate all SEQRA documentation through the Planning Board as Lead Agency, or to help expedite the reviews by simultaneously providing our office with extra copies of the documentation. In the interim, please: ( a) notify the Planning Board as to your intentions to proceed under the coordinated agency SEQRA review and requested Scoping Session; (b) provide us with seven (7) prints of the original map; 4_ � � ` � Yage 2 - May 22, 1991 To: Irving Like, Esq. Re: Hanauer & Bagley (c) provide us with a copy of the most current Suffolk County Health Department approved map locatinq the new cesspool and well systems for the new dwelling (for which Huilding Permit #16160 has been written) in the most westerly section of the premises. Very trul yours� % GERARD P. GOEHRINGE CHAIRMAN lk r� * � , �gUFFO(,�c S4,bFiGE p� O PP �� G� � APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS y � SCOTT L.HARRIS ,�. T Supervisor Gerard P.Gcehringer,Chairmau �,f, • �� Charles Grigonis,Jr. �O,( � �,0� Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen,Jr. P.O.Box 1179 James Dinizio, Jr. Southold,New York 11971 Robert A. Villa BOARD OF APPEALS Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone(516)765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone(516)765-1800 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Planning Board FROM: Jerry Goehringer, Chairman Board of Apgeals DATE: May 22, 1991 SUBJECT: Your File - Hanauer & Sagley CTM #1000-50-6-4 This memorandum is to advise that we have received an application for an area variance concerning the above pendinq subdivision project. It is our understanding in reviewing the Planning Hoard file that a SEQRA Scoping Session was postponed without a date as requested by the applicants' attorney. Although we are in receipt of the area variance request, the Board of Appeals would like to be included in your list as an involved and interested agency under SEQRA by the Planning Board, which is Lead Agency in this project. It is our reco�nendation that the Planning Board notify the applicants' attorney and re-schedule the SEQRA Scoping Session, (or pursuant to Section 617.7a, alternatively prepare for exchange a written scope of issues to be addressed in the DEIS) . You may note in the SEQRA rules that a written scope of issues should be provided (within 30 days of a Positive Declaration) , and if none is provided, then the applicant may submit a DEIS. Also, if the applicants prefer (within 30 calendar days) not to proceed with a Scoping Session, the applicant may prepare a DEIS. The applicant should, in any event, decide within the next 30 days. Pursuant to Section 617. 3 (a) , any further ZBA action to decide or carry out the variance application must be held in abeyance until such time as SEQRA has continued with the MAY 2 d 199� , i ., � � Page 2 - May 22, 1991 To: Planning Board Re: Hanauer & Bagley involved ageneies and finalized by the Planning Board, as lead agency. Thank you for giving us this opportunity to participate in your coordination of this matter under SEQRA. GG:lk cc: Town Attorneys _ _ _ _ —_ �\ � �U��O��^D �" - G�c PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o ' � T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 0 � ' O� Supervisor George Ri[chie La[ham, Jr. ry4' � Richazd G. Ward ��.� �� Town Hali, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards pLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York i 19"71 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 21, 1990 David Kapell 400 Front Street Greenport, NeFr York 11944 RE: Subdivision Proposal for Hanauer/Bagley SCTM# 1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Kapell; The Planning Board has reviewed the discussion which took place, at your client's request, at the November 13 , 1990, Planning Board meeting. The Board's position has not changed from that stated in their July 3 , 1989, correspondence (copy enclosed) . The parcel is located in the Agricultural-Conservation (AC) District. The upland areas of the proposed lots do not meet the minimum lot requirements for this district. The Planning Board can not proceed with this application as it does not conform to the requirements of the above mentioned district. if you wish, you can proceed with an application before the Zoning Board of Appeals for an area variance. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, ��.:.t�� i/� Bennett Orlowski, Jr. v Chairman enc. cc: Sanford Hanauer, Applicant Milton Baqley, Applicant Harvey A. Arnoff, Town Attorney Gerard P. Goehrinqer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector �nurta.��::. x....M:«;r3..w�u,�iWwrv=;.-+'�I.�.�.hr�'keARc.�a�.,.. . . , ,. . �i s � � r...�"b °�� :Yaev.�+Je4W��'r'r�� . . .. ^r�3..�+.4d3g$au PLANNING BOARD . 19 NOVEMBER � 1990 � C Mr. Raynor: I can go in and get it updated, I can go in . tomorrow but I didn' t want to go in, have it updated have it filed and then not be able to pump it to the satisfaction of the commissioners. I will await your instructions. Mr. McDonald: Would you be prepared if the commissioner could find their way clear to take care of this you would be prepared to pump it off for them in any manner they prescribed. Mr. Raynor: Yes. Thank you very much. ***********x********x*********x*****z*** Mr. Orlowski: Good evening, Mr. Hanauer and Mr. Baqley are here. — Mr. Irving Like: I 'm a council to the Wickham firm. Mr. Bagley is not here, Mr. Hanauer and Mr. Kapellare here. There' s an old mexican curse that says, may your life be filled with lawyers and I 'm afraid that Mr. Hanauer and Mr. Bagley have been afflicted with that curse. I appreciate you giving us the opportunity to meet with you in this informal way. Back in July of last year, you wrote a letter to Mr. Kapell stating that, the Planning Board has reviewed the concerns brought up at the meeting held on June 12, 1989 as C stated in the positive declaration, the upland area of the subject premises does not meet the minimum lot area requirement to the agricultural conservation A-C district and the Planning Board cannot proceed with this application as it does not conform to the requirements of the above mentioned district. If you wish upon receipt of a disapproval from the Building Department you can proceed with an application before the Zoning Board of Appeals for an area variance. The reason we are here tonight is to ask you respectfully to reconsider that position in the light of a number of equitable considerations that I would like to bring to your attention as well as some very practical reasons. First a little chronology 2 think may be helpful. Back in July of 1985 the Southold Trustees passed a resolution which authorized the issuance of a permit to build one house. In July of 1985, this is the letter I am referring to (Submitted letter) . On February 19th of 1987 a memo was sent to you from Victor Lessard stating that it was his understanding that parcels containing wetlands, for purposes of determining the area of the parcel must be included in the calculations and he stated that the board should take this approach until such time as the state wishes to change this clause. Then, , on May 15th of 1987 the Board of Appeals addressed the letter to the Wickham law firm and I will hand it up to you in a moment, in which it stated that the Town Attorney has advised that court decisions were rendered during 1986 indicating that wetland areas cannot be deleted when calculating ` the area of lots in pending or proposed divisions of land. That is this letter. That is May i5th, 1987. Now, that date is PLANNING BOARD ! 20 NOVEMBER � 1990 ; very important because on May 23rd of 1987 Hanauer and . C Bagley submitted an application for a minor two lot subdivision. On May 29th of 1987 the Suffolk County Department of Health Services sent a letter stating that the two lots were considered to be suitable for the installation of individual sewage disposal systems and I will hand that letter in. Now, as of May 29th, 1987 so far as the Board of Appeals was concerned, so far as the Town Attorney was concerned, so far as the courts were concerned, if you came in with an application and there was wetlands or land under water on your property, you would none the less have to count that towards density. In May of 1987, these applicants, I believe, had a right to proceed with a two lot subdivision. A building permit was issued on July 23rd, 1985 to build the first house so what you had before you in May of 1987, was a two lot subdivision under which a building permit had been issued for one house and then in August of 1987 the foundation was installed. Mr. Orlowski: The building permit was issued on one lot. Mr. Like: I understand that, it was issued on one lot. Mr. McDonald: There was a lot and a building permit was issued for one lot. Mr. Like: Then there was an application for a two lot C subdivision on which that one lot on which the building permit was issued was shown and located. In August of 1987 the foundation was installed. Now, it wasn' t until February of 1989 that you amended your zoning ordinance to prohibit the calculation of land under water towards computing density and I believe, correct me if I 'm wrong, that it was on the strength of that amendment of the ordinance which led you in July of 1989 to say that you could not proceed with the application. Now, there is a lot of case law and I won' t burden you with it now, which states that where you have a map pending before a body such as the Planning Board, where you have a permit that has been issued or you have the commencement of physical construction on the property pursuant to the permit, the applicant has the vested right to proceed. Put that aside for the moment because I said earlier that 2 want to deal with equities of the situation. Now you have suggested that the applicant go before the Board of Appeals. The Board of Appeals has already expressed itself and the correspondence before you indicates that the Board of Appeals believes that the land should be counted towards density. Furthermore, as you know, when you seek a variance you have to establish before the Board of Appeals that you will suffer significant financial injury if the variance has been denied. We have consulted with an appraiser and we have an appraisal report indicating that if a variance is denied so that this owner is limited to one house he will lose approximately $130,000.00. That is the value of the building lot in this area � based on market data and comparable sales. We believe that going before the Board of Appeals we could make a case of PLANNING BOARD � Z1 NOVEMBER•, 1990 significant financial injury that would justify getting a permit � Cto complete a minor subdivision for two lots and we think it would be a waste of the board' s time to come forward again with all of the layout that would be incident to that procedure. Now, here is a practical consideration that I said I would discuss earlier. You are aware of the problem that has been caused by the business with the pond. Primarily, what has been happening is storm water drainage from the town road carrying with it contaminants gets into the pond on the Hanauer property and the overflow of storm waters also causes the pond to rise and to swell beyond its normal configuration. We have commissioned a report by the Barrett Engineering Firm and they have informed us that based on the preliminary investigation of the area, approximately 1300 linear feet of town roads, Soundview AvenuE and Lighthous� road drain directly to the low point on Sound View into the ponds on the Hanauer property and on the property to the North. The only drainage that is provided by the town are two twelve inch metal pipes on the south edge of the pavement of Sound View Avenue draining into the pond onto the Hanauer property and a culvert which connects the two ponds. Mr. Barrett, we've asked him to do a more detailed analysis but he has already indicated that a minimal amount of drainage that would be necessary to correct the situation on the town road would be a substantial dollar amount so we have a situation where we' re being denied the opportunity to build two lots and we are confronted with a C condition of flooding which comes from a town road and we are left with a situation where there is significant financial injury. What I would like to do now is introduce Mr. Hanauer and ask him to submit to you a proposal which would involve your permitting him to go forward with two lots and a suggestion as to correct the drainage problem. Mr. Sanford Hanauer: As Mr. Like has indicated the following would be my suggestion or a suggestion. Being that the elevation of the road is I believe around fifty feet and the low point which is on the adjoining property which is about forty-seven to fifty in this area. What happens is the water runs into the pond and when it reaches its crest it backs up through the culvert floods the neighbor to the north. Several years ago, about a year ago, there was a berm down here that was placed there by a farmer some twenty odd years ago, I understand, was cut open and released the water on the property t� the south which is the Too Bee Property and created a wetland area. Being that this is the low point, what we would like to suggest is being involved in the Too Bee Property also. The best way to control the water here is to create some sort of a drainage system in this northwest corner of the Too Bee property whereby with a pipe controlling the level of the pond so this way the water could continue to spill into the pond and be controlled by a level in here and we are willing to give the town an easement to a section of this property to construct such � a drainage ditch and I think that would solve everybody' s problem. PLANNING BOARD . 22 NOVEMBER •, 1990 Mr. McDonald: How long have you owned this property? � CMr. Hanauer: About five years. Mr. McDonald: The pond was there when you bought it. Mr. Hanauer: Yes. Mr. McDonald: The drainage situation was approximately the same at the time you bought it. Mr. Hanauer: I wrote a letter to Ray Jacobs asking him when the culvert was installed and I have a photograph showing this road without any disturbance to the blacktop. Mr. McDonald: Was this pond here at the time you bought that? Mr. Hanauer: Yes. The pond showed on the original maps in 1873 without a road. Mr. McDonald: So it was one pond. Mr. Hanauer: It was one pond so I think what happens there is the water starts up here and flows into this pond and then when it really overflows onto the road in the winter time when there are icy conditions it becomes hazardous and I think that is why � the Highway Department put the culvert underneath the road to avoid the spillover onto the road and as a result more water comes into our pond. Mr. Orlowski: Did you ever get a variance to put that foundation in so close to the pond? Mr. Hanauer: Yes, at that time fifty feet was required. Mr. Orlowski: This is forty-six feet. Mr. Hanauer: Well, the pond has changed since this last survey was taken. Mr. McDonald: This foundation is in compliance with all the regulations7 Mr. Aanauer: That is correct. Mr. Orlowski: I think it was suppose to be seventy-five. Mr. Hanauer: At the time, we originally wanted to put it on the edge of the pond and they asked for a fifty-foot setback. Mr. McDonald: And you are forty-six. � PLANNING BOARD « 23 NOVEMBER �, 1990 ' - Mr. Hanauer: Well, that survey was made after the wetland Csurvey so we have had changes in the elevation of the pond, it fluctuates. Mr. Orlowski: I can remember and I go back a little ways. This was in a long, long time ago I even think before you owned it. Mr. Hanauer: Which? Mr. Orlowski: This piece of property on a subdivision. Mr. Hanauer: It was previously owned by a family called Stefenson, we purchased from tihem. I really don't know if they had made any applications. Mr. McDonald: We've been told that the DEC had an order to close the openinq that had been created in the southern part of the pond, is that correct? Mr. Hanauer: That is correct. Mr. McDonald: Has it been closed? Mr. Hanauer: Yes, it was closed. The DEC asked us to do it and we complied. The ditch showed on this map. Originally, we C had a negative declaration on this piece of property and then when this water was let out onto this property it was a request from the Town Trustees to go back and they designated it as a wetland. But we requested when the dike was put back, if they would go back six months and examine it they would remove the wetlands designation. Mr. McDonald: Well, the subdivision map shows the buffer no matter what the Trustees would do in the future that shows in the subdivision map with this other property. Mr. Hanauer: Which property? McDonald: For this wetlands, so whatever the Trustees say that would remain in the subdivision map no matter what. Mr. Hanauer: Well, O.K. , but if it was found that this was done illegally by creating the wetland, we know it was cut open we have evidence, we have a document from the Police Department and the Bay Constable has it. Ms. Scopaz: You said earlier you are proposing drainage. By putting in a pipe would that not in effect establish the wetlands permanently? Mr. Hanauer: No, not unless you put in a storm drain or a � sump. PLANNING BOARD � 24 NOVEMSER�, 1990 Mr. McDonald: Why that rather than just a natural drainage area? . CMr. Hanauer: I 'm not an engineer. Mr. McDonald: How much do you envision lowering the water table, not the water table but the level of the pond? Mr. Hanauer: We would like to keep it at a level of roughly forty-seven. Mr. McDonald: And its present level is? Mr. Hanauer: I think now it is way up, 2 think it is about forty-eight. Mr. McDonald: So you envision lowering the level of t.he pond? Mr. Hanauer: Just to control it so it doesn' t back up and allows for heavy rainfall and drainage, it' s like a valve. Mr. McDonald: See, these are two problems. One is a drainage problem. You' re talking about drainage from the town road to your property which is really not in our province in a sense. The other one you are talking about the actual subdivision of the property which clearly is in our jurisdiction. C Mr. Hanauer: The Planning Board has the power to deal with conditions with this sort here and solve these problems and if what we are suggesting is that (inaudible) minor subdivision you can also solve the problem that otherwise might burden the tax payers with the town that would be prudent on the part of the Planning Board. So I think your powers are considerable and we are proposing a solution which we think will not only take care of the two lot subdivision but take care of a festering problem that has caused nothing but acrimony. Ms. Scopaz: If you are proposing to allow the two subdivisions to be considered as one piece of property for purposes of drainage. . . . Mr. Like: No, what we' re suggesting is that Mr. Hanauer will consent to burden another piece of property of his by either creating a storm drainage easement or dedicating it so that it serves as a safety valve to prevent flooding from occurring on a town road and from flooding occurring on his property and the neighbor to the north. Incidentally, the other point I would like to make is that under none of the proposals that are being presented to you will there be any disturbance to the. pond. The pond will be kept as a resource and it will be kept as open space. Whatever buffers you feel are necessary will be established, we even could, as part of any arrangement with whoever buys these properties create a two party homeowners � association with covenances protecting the pond. If we had presented this to you as a cluster, we could have given you a PLANNING BOARD � 25 NOVEMBER� , 1990 ; map with three lots, two of them being lots on which the two . C buildings were to be constructed and the third lot being the pond and that could be protected in some fashion to be dedicated and be protected. Mr. McDonald: Do you have a sketch plan on this? Is there a sketch plan approval? Is there any approval? 2 'm not the Board of Appeals so I 'm not going to get into it really but you are essentially saying your vested but you don' t even have a sketch plan approval. Mr. Like: I know, I 'm saying that there was a minor subdivision submitted. Mr. McDonald: Where is it, where is the sketch plan? Mr. Like: There was a application submitted. Mr. McDonald: You don' t even have a sketch plan approval on it though. I mean where is the vested? Is there a sketch plan approval on it? Mr. Kappel: We applied in May of 1987 for a subdivision application. Subsequent to that a determination of a requirement that we file a long form environmental assessment was made by this board. I prepared and filed a long form � environmental assessment which the board found inadequate and suggested that we hire a professional to do the same thing which we did. We hired En-Consultants from Southampton and filed a new long form environmental assessment which specifically addressed the comments of the town's engineer at the time in response to my original filing. We submitted the amended or revised assessment. The town engineer proceeded to re-review the original filing that I had made as opposed to reviewing the filing that En-Consultants provided which resulted in at least a three or four month delay. When we finally received the town engineers seconds review it became obvious that he had reviewed the same document twice. So then the town retained the services of Dave Emilita' s firm and Mr. Emilita proceeded then over a three or four month period to finally review En-Consultants submission. Upon the completion of that review, Mr. Emilita suggested that there was a necessity for a survey of the potential for impacts on endangered wild life and animal species, so we contracted with Hampton Manor Associates to conduct such a survey at considerable expense. The survey was completed and submitted and as a result of all of these submissions the .Planning Board then made a positive declaration on the long form environmental assessment. We did have a scoping session and that was, I believe in June or July of 1989 and that' s where the thing left off. At that point, and during this period of time, the Town Board amended the zoning such that the requirement that the wetland area be excluded from ( the computation for density purposes. It was altered. ` Meanwhile, we had diligently pursued all of the steps that the PLANNING BOARD � 26 NOVEMBER� , 1990 Planning Board had laid out, operating under the assumption that C , the wetlands were going to be included in the density calculation, thousands of dollars were spent and a considerably amount of time elapsed. The fact that the Planning Board didn' t take action on it is of no fault of ours. Mr. McDonald: We had a scoping session? Mr. Kapell: We had a scoping session yes. Mr. McDonald: And you submitted an impact statement? Mr. Kapell: No, we never submitted a draft environmental impact statement because at that point we were told that we had to go to the Zoning Board. In other words, two years elapsed. Essentially what happened H�as two years elapsed during which time we complied with various requirements that were set before us. Mr. McDonald: Let me see if 2 understand. You had a scoping session, you never submitted a enviromental impact statement. In the meantime, you've gone to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Kapell: No, no. We didn't, we elected not to. Mr. McDonald: You elected not to but you took no other action Cas well. What other action did you take after that? Mr. Kapell: We haven' t done anything since July of 1985. Mr. McDonald: So you didn't submit the impact statement and you did nothing else. Mr. Kapell: No, there was no point in submitting an impact statement if we were going to have to go to the Zoning Board first and get a variance. What was the applicant to gain by spending several thousand dollars in more time preparing a draft environmental impact statement when in fact the Zoning Board might very well turn them down. Mr. McDonald: But you would have had to have it for that too. You would have had to have the SEQRA process at the ZBA as well. Mr. Kapell: The point is , is that at that point and if I can speak for you Sandy, at that point, the whole question of the town' s disposition towards this application became a subject of discussion because the rules essentially had been changed in mid stream. The question of the inclusion of the wetland area into the density calculation had never been an issue until the scoping session. � Mr. Orlowski: It' s been a year and a half and now your back here telling us that you have some type of status. PLANNING BOARD � z7 NOVEMBER� , 1990 Mr. Kapell: Well, we waited two years to get to the last , Cpoint. Mr. Like: The answer to that Mr. Orlowski, is that my client has been stunned and it was that dilemma of being caught between a rock and a hard place that led them to consult me and I reviewed the file and we' re here tonight in the interest of working this out in an applicable way and that is why I started out by saying we think the equities here suggest, as well as the practicality suggests that should allowed to proceed. We don't think that being allowed to build two lots will be injurious to the environment. We believe that all of our consultants have come to that conclusion. Nobody has negative. . . , nobody has come forth and said you are going to hurt the pond in anyway. Mr. Orlowski: Well, there hasn't been any formal impact statement. Mr. McDonald: The process hasn't been entered into it. Mr. Like: We are perfectly prepared to defend the two lot subdivision as being one that is compatible with good environment practices We are perfectly prepared to protect the pond in any reasonable way. We are prepared to adopt whatever mitigation proposals the Planning Board makes as well as the DEC, if the DEC is interested and my experience is that a project of C this minimum size can be handled in a matter that is compatible with good planning. We don't think we are asking a great deal to be allowed to go forward. Especially, when not to go forward means a substantial loss financially for the client. Mr. McDonald: I don' t see how we can do anything, I mean the section of the code triat is applicable here about his density is in the Zoning section of the code and that is clearly in the province of the Zoning Board of Appeals. We can't simply waive that requirement. If it was in the subdivision section, if we thought it had equity we could but since it's in the Zoning section any relief from that section of the code would have to come from the Zoning Board Appeals. I 'm talking about the section about deletion, the present existence in the code, the deletion of wetlands is in the zoning section. Not in the subdivision section. Mr. Like: The court cases indicate that where you have an owner who would be entitled to the density under Section 281B certainly in this instance we would be entitled under Section 281B of the town law or under your cluster to come in with two lots that we are entitled and to go forward with two lots not withstanding the local ordinance of the type you're talking about. Mr. McDonald: That determines the actual yield. You haven't � determined your yield yet. � • � � ` - . , � ♦ • 2• The abovement ' construed loned covenant and restrict ' .. a$ a covenant ru�in l�n sha11 b_ i continue and g with the land / remain in full ' and shall against the o�er r_ force and effect at all times as of the p _mises in perpetuity, rN WITNESS WfIF.I�EOF, the this Declaration og Declarant has hereb Covenants and �' executed first above Restrictions the _ written. day and ye�. � A � J � J01�g�Y � STATE OF NEW YO�� COi7NTy pF NASSAU � ss. personall the a3�'D aaY of February describedy c�e� S� �NAUEg acknowled ln and who exec ' known to ' 1993. bePore me ged that she execu ed�e f°reg 1 g bns�he individual he same� rument, and �� STATE OF N� Y�� Nota�' ��,� COUNTy pF NASSAU ) ss' t CARO!1 K,7FNlG '� �Nc 4ry839377�M of hzW Yak Personall the �� daY oP Feb �0mm��ianEx;.N�L�'AL�y ; Y came ,7�� o be �e � s r.arr.h 3, :9y described in a�d who exe�uted�O me�to993' before me ackriewledged that she executed�e fOregoin individual �e S�e. 9 instrument, and N ta�i � . y�_ L � i IVutanl P�pj��St2Ke ot Na:v�ari Nc.48.�8377-Nassau CouM,Y Commissicn;�p�re;;Farc.h 3. ;9`�`/ _ _ Z _ STATE OF NEW YORK ss.: • � County of SuH'oik I,EDWARD P.ROMAINE,Gerk of the County of Suffollc and Cletk of the Supreme Courl of the State of New York in and for said County(said Cour�being a Court of ge�rd)DO HEREBY CERTIFy that I have compazed the annexed co of _ naa uner 63 9 at Page �3 � x�oraea �—i�—gg and that it is a just and liue copy of s�h ori6� Declaratlou � of the whole thereof. � IN TESI7MON1'WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my 6and and afFixed the seai of said County and Caurt Uiis !/ day of 1993 ............................................��``� ��.......... , ..................... orm No. 104 Clerk _ _ , . _ _ ' _ _ _ � � r � � 11632P�635 SCHEDULE A All that certain plot, piece or parcel of land situate lying and being at Hortons Point, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows, to wit: BEGZNNING at a corner formed by the intersection of the westerly side of Lighthouse Road with the Southerly side of� Soundview Avenue; RUNNING�THENCE along the westerly side of Lighthouse Road, South 41 degrees, il minutes, 00 seconds East 419 . 04 feet to land now or Pormerly of John McGuire; TIiENCE along the northerly line of land now or formerly of John McGuire, South 48 degrees, 55 minutes 10 seconds West ' 456.94 feet to the easterly line of land now or formerly of Genevieve Sepenowski; - THENCE along the easterly line of land now or formerly of Genevieve Sepenowski, North 42 degrees, 15 minutes, 20 seconds West 515.04 feet to the southerly side of Soundview Avenue; THENCE along the southerly side of Soundview Avenue North 60 degrees, 31 minutes 30 seconds East 476.50 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING. � �� _....--_..--"' �/�� SAnlFo20 h��4NAcJE� ' ,so w000.a.��y ,eo �.li!i?0� `��j�f1S �..... _ , ::_�,-� cvo o v.6 cr.0� .t1•�/. /i79� �,a� 'J -'�;RtQ3 E6. �!G 9S II I I �F c�uaoa��. 7��9� � a :oo P.m , � ��,�s� � �� f��` l��/LGf� d7o-�., Td�ux��",�s.r�xGr/ � /�/a'r�a� , C�+��-[../ � C//�"YGt�t�.- �li�iia..r��o��.r, � �-a�`_ ��n��r G�� G�'"�,,�� , ' , �� '��ee_,i ''��j�" , � f I'zv c �� C C, r� .4�j�vl�NE h�lZ. A�L,c��?' -�a-.�y�uz � JT�e...�.,� ^ � li�r �-r� l�n /�a ��`U�� l e� �1�'�'w"'L' � � ��oC.�� r.�s, ' ,�'��G�— ��' __ ._ _... .-_._ . .. ___.., ..--sr `�_ . ... . __.._.-._.�.�,._.r. --�._.. _._ .. . .. _ . . -_.. . ... . . _ . .._ - �� ,o��FF�c , y' ''� � � To�vn Hall, 53095 Main Road Q w �. P.O. Box 1179 �1 � �bo Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 � PLANNING BOARD OFFICE • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 3, 2989 David Kapell 400 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Hanauer/Bagley SCTM#100Q-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Kapell: The Planning Board has reviewed the concerns braught up at the meeting held on June 12, 1989. As stated in the Positive Declaration, the ugland area of the subject premises does not meet the minimum lot area requiremeat for the Agricultural-Conservation (AC) District. The Planning Board can not proceed with this application as it does not conform to the requirements of the above mentioned district. If you wish, upon receipt of a disapgroval from the Building Department, you can proceed with an application before the Zoning Board of Appeals for an area variance. The Planning Board will withhold the re-scheduling of the scoping sesss.on until notification that the 2oning Board of Appeals has made a determination on the application. Please coatact the office if you have any further questions. ery t ly o s . , rGyt/►t BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAti cc: Sanford Hanauer, Applicant Milton Hagley, Applicant Kenneth Coenen, Applicaat' s Consultaat ,Tames A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Thomas W. Cramer, Town Consultant Zoning Board of Appeals Building Department _ . � °=�' � ;`� ,�5 r��""3"',�:� � r� � , �, �.v r � y�c.... +`. � L"�� , � .�¢ � . • � r r �()� ��NA FQ �.SY Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ' �,� ;; �.� P.O. Box 1179 �" 1f/ ;y ";a�J:- Southold. New York I 1971 �-�.,�-._ ' TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 19, 1989 David Kapell 400 Front Street Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Hanauer/Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Kapell: A review of our books indicates that the fees for the ongoing environmental review of the above-referenced project subject to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act have not been paid. Enclosed you will find a copy of the bill that was sent to the Planning Boaxd by its environmental coasultant, Szepatowski Associates, Inc. for the review of the above-named project to date. It would be appreciated if you would submit the balance, which is $925.00, to this office by July 3, 1989. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. V truly yours, � ^ ;��''ry�� ';'s. ,,�%% � .!,:tist✓' • ,_ _ . • ' , ;,. . �� BENNETT ORLOWSICZ,JR. l� CHAIRMAIZ cc: James A. Schondeba=e, Town Attoraey John A. Cushman, Town Accountant 1 �_' _... �< e ' , ��1�r;,i,(.: . �...� �� .� += =t'd � + =' �t' �• �n:, , �.� � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road O�"ti� �' ' P.O. Box 1179 � �"�y�f( �:� `'�'`�� Southold. New York 1 1971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 � PLANNING SOARD OFFICE • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 3, 1989 David Kapell 400 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Hanauer/Bagley SCTM#1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Kapell: The Planning Board has reviewed the concerns brought up at the meeting held on June 12, 1989. As stated in the Positive Declaration, the upland area of the subject premises does not meet the minimum lot area requirement for the Agricultuzal-Conservation [AC) District. The Planning Board can not proceed with this application as it does not conform to the requirements of the above mentioned district. If you wish, ugon receipt of a disapprQval from the IIuil�ing Department, you can proceed with an application before the 2oning Board of Appeals for an area variance. 'Fhe Planning Board will withhold the re-scheduling of the scoping session until notification that the Zoning Board of Appeals has made a determination an the application. Please contact the office if you have any further questions. eryr�' ' l.y o s .,lirt/+L � r . BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAt1 cc: Sanford Hanauer, Applicant Milton Bagley, Applicant Kenneth Coenen, Applicant' s Consultant �ames A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Thomas W. Cramer, Town Consultant ° Zoning Board of Appeals ' ;�'� " � `,_ Building Department r . � � .4'k , ��. —.' -u �-x�u^'�lt� �, ,�. .. ,.� �[�' *':3r'" "k��_i.,. Py�t¥Ti4d . - . y a y,. •4' f • i-'�n..a.... .� -..i.�' r mr d�na��ii�dk».t. " _;:riw„ ... . .,.� ..., . . . ,�:�ec�s�rwe-�.:Weax^`�*-- � � p C� � L �_�.... � `� I � 1�9 r(i� ' ws�so°cuTE"us�i'N�c D E S 1 G N E R S SOUTHOLD iOWN wOODB�U�RBY N 1iR90 FLANNINGBOARD ; 5ts s92 aa04 July 17 , 1989 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. Planning Board Office Town of Southold P, 0. Box 1119 Southold , New York 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski : Re : Hanauer/Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4 Your letter of June 19th to Mr. David Kapell requested we submit the balance of 5925 covering the environmental revieN of the above-named project by Szepatowski Associates . Attached to your letter, were copies of the following invoices from SzepatoNski : September 29, 1988 E425. 00 April 27, 1989 �500. 00 The April invoice is marked "Corrected Invoice" ; therefore , would you please review this matter and advise if the balance due is �425 or 5500. 61e would also appreciate receiving all back up materlal on what was done by Szepatowski Associates . Ve truly yours , Sanford Hana e aAc SH :cdk cc : Mr . David Kapell Mr. Milton Bagley _ � _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ � _ �' � G�-e-�`V 7/��9 . p � 6L� � " 9 �' �' �T � JI1L (]pn ; i`' ' s""F°no"""'"'e" I 9 J�c�J ��,� ASSOCIATES INC D E S I G N E R S � � 130 WOODBURY RQ4D SOUTtIOLD 70WN woo�BURv Nv tn97 "' PLANNIkGBOaRD 5ts s92•aa0a July 17, 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski . Jr. Planning Board Office Town of Southold P. 0. Box 1119 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski : Re : Hanauer/Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4 Your letter of June 19th to Mr . David Kapell requested we submit the balance of E925 covering the environmental review of the above-named project by Szepatowski Associates . Attached to your letter, were copies of the following invoices from Szepatowski : September 29, 1988 E425. 00 April 27, 1989 $500. 00 The April invoice is marked "Corrected Invoice" ; therefore , would you please review th9s matter and advise if the balance due is $425 or 5500. We would also appreciate receiving all back up material on what was done by Szepatowski Associates. Ve truly yours , Sanford Hana e �Pc SH :cdk cc : Mr . David Kapell Mr. Milton Bagley PLANNING BOARD � 2g NOVEMBERj, 1990 Mr. Like: I 'm saying the case law consisting of Forte versus , C the Village of Worwick, the Done Company case, friends of Shawangunks, Inc. all say that where the owner has the right to a cluster under Section 281B of the Town Law, which we obviously do in this case, that that gives him the yield and that under those circumstances you can' t delete land under water from calculating density. Mr. Orlowski: I think that was a minimum of ten acres to wasn' t it? Mr. Like: No, your cluster provisions allow you to go forward with less than ten acres. Back then you didn' t have the requirements. Mr. McDonald: You're not requir.ed to cluster at the present time. Mr. Like: I 'm saying that from the standpoint of vested rights that we believe we have right now to go forward. Mr. McDonald: But you're not a cluster subdivision, there would never be any question if it would be a cluster. What is your total acreage? Mr. Like: 4. 9 acres. � Mr. McDonald: The code doesn't talk about cluster until you're ten acres. Mr. Like: No, that' s when it is mandatory but we can apply for a cluster under B of that Section of your Zoning ordinance. You have the right to mandate cluster if it is more then ten acres but you and your discretion can treat this as a cluster and we can apply for cluster. I 'm simply asking you to exercise your discretion in an equitable manner here to treat this applicant as one against who the rules were changed in middle of the procedures. Mr. orlowski: Well back then, and being on the board, it was written in the code it was "land subject to flooding" left a lot of things open and we were having some problems with it. Back then the board felt any land under water was unbuildable period. As policy we stuck to that. In this case here I would say we would be on good grounds and sticking to our policy that this isn' t wetlands or land subject to flooding, we're talking about land under water and that is why even now brought it up to send it before the Zoning Board of Appeals. You know this isn' t even close. One half is under water and one half is above. Ms. Scopaz: Mr. Chairman, I would just like to mention one thing. I understand your argument but I do want to point out � one thing, the statement that was made earlier that in 1989 when the Town Board changed the Zoning Code. � The things that you are PLANNING BOARD � 29 NOVEMBER� , 1990 asking the Planning Board to do are not within their � ! jurisdiction. They were determined by the Town Board, by the � adoption of the zoning code, and there was no grandfather clause built into it and that was something that was made very clear to this board. The town board does not care at what stage a subdivision was in, if it does not have final approval then all the rules of the game have changed.. The town board is quite aware that it has done that. Your arguments about the vested interests have to do with the building permit application and that is not a matter before the Planning Board. If you have a question about whether your foundation is vested that is an issue that you would take up before the Zoning Board of Appeals. The way the code currently stands, my understanding is, you have to go to the Zoning Board to ask for the relief, and present your case to the board, including all the case law that you've sited. I don' t think that this board has any jurisdiction, it says very clear, in the code, whether they would want to or not. Mr. Like: I respect your comments and I am aware of what we would have to do before the Board of Appeals, but what I am trying to do however, is to see whether or not there is a basis for a practical solution that will accomplish not only the end results of fairness for everybody concerned, but also solve a drainage problem. Now, what is your, and I am seeking some guidance now from you, what is your sense as to how you would C regard an application for a cluster where we would present you with a site plan showing let us say three lots. Two of which would be the lots on which the buildings would be built and the third lot would be the pond. We have certainly the amount of area to have a cluster. Mr. McDonald: We would deny it for lack of variance and you would go to the ZBA. That section of the code is very clear that that is deleted. It doesn't talk about whether it' s cluster or not cluster that's section 239. That section says that if it is underwater it is deleted from the yield calculations. Now, we don' t have the power, even if we saw merit in this we don't physically have the power over that. If the case that you are siting is correct the ZBA is still the place to do that. I don' t see how we can get into their section of the code and tell them what to do. Mr. Kapell: To carry this on a little bit. Say the applicant decided to apply for the variance wouldn't the zoninq board ask ' this board for a recommendation on the variance? Mr. McDonald: On the basis of something that was submitted they would ask for our comments. Mr. Kapell: They would ask for your recommendation wouldn' t they? ` PLANNING BOARD � 30 NOVEMBEE�3 , 1990 Mr. Like: Do you see any equity in this situation? Are we just . C wasting our time tonight or our we trying to get through to you that what' s happened here is unfair to this applicant. This applicant pursued every request that was made by the Planning Board and the ground was cut out from under him. Mr. Orlowski: I really don' t see that. I ' ll have the town attorney review this with us. You know you also waited another year and a half to come back in and there is no sketch granted here. The Planning Board, and I told you our policy before, this land was under water so we did not entertain and sent it to the ZBA. Mr. Like: The ZBA at the time you sent it to them said you have to count that land even though it is under water. When this matter was originally brought to the attention of the ZBA they said you've got to count it under water, the town attorney said you've got to count it under water, the court said you had to count it under water. Then while this application is pending, and this applicant is breaking his chops and spending his money getting all the studies you want, and the town board qoes and changes all of the rules. Now, if that doesn't sound like equity, I think I would be very much surprised if you would not feel deep down that something here needs attention and needs direction. That is not fair. That is not fair play with this applicant. Now, you can say to me you don' t have the power but I C know you know deep down that this guy was shafted. This applicant was shafted and he stands to lose $130,000. 00 plus all the other monies plus the delay and you' re forcing him into an issue where he' s got to go to the courts. We don' t want to go to the courts. We would rather sit down and work out a solution that is not going to hurt anybody. Mr. McDonald: We' re not telling you that. In fact, if you went to the court at this point, again I 'm not a lawyer so it' s only the way I understand it, you wouldn' t get anywhere in the courts now until you went to the ZBA. You would have to exhaust all your local possibilities before they would entertain it. The next step with this is the ZBA isn' t it? Mr. Like: I would be very happy to talk to the town attorney, you might mention to the town attorney the case of DuVail vs. Ross. Mr. McDonald: I ' ll be happy to let you take care of that. Mr. Like: Whether it' s a Planning Board or a Zoning Board of Appeals or any kind of a board, if an applicant is delayed and because the delay is prevented from getting vested rights he is entitled to relief from the courts. Mr. Orlowski: That' s if you were delayed. ` Mr. Like: There is no question that we were delayed. PLANNING BOARD . 31 NOVEMBER� , 1990 , Mr. McDonald: Where is your impact statement that you were � requested to do? Mr. Like: 2 explained to you that if you're telling the applicant "we're only going to give you one lot but we want you to spend $10,000. 00 on a full impact statement. Mr. McDonald: You don't have to determine that in advance, the impact statement is part of it. Mr. Like: But you have already determined that you are not qoing to give him more then one lot why should he spend $10,000. 00 on a full impact statement. After he gives you the impact statement you' ll say "sorry fellow you've got only one lot" . Mr. McDonald: Hut his contention all along that he has two lots. Mr. Like: But you told me he didn' t have two lots. Mr. McDonald: If we tell you now that you don't have two lots then you're going to go to court. Mr. Like: You' re saying to him we' re not going to give you two lots go get an impact statement. Does that make sense to get an impact statement after you tell him. � Mr. McDonald: 2 wasn' t here so 2 'm not 'sure but there was a scoping session that you entered into. Mr. Hanauer: We requested a scoping session and two people appeared at this scoping session. Melissa and En-Consultant and the first question we asked was why was there a change, why were they deleting the calculation of the water? No one could answer that. Your new consultant said we have to do whatever statement has to be done before we talk about anything else. I said, well we have to get this question answered and we can never get it answered. We started out initially as a variance then when they said you could calculate the water as part of it, we were told to change it to a minor subdivision after going through two years of all the shenanigans and everything that was asked for. We come back now and now we' re back to a variance. Mr. McDonald: I guess I know what is really confusing here, the problem I have a problem with, why do you need a scoping session with the Planning Board at all, hold it, if your not trying to get a subdivision. Mr. Hanauer: You called a scoping session, we didn' t call it. Mr. McDonald: Why are you even talking to the Planning Board if � it' s a single lot you would be with the building inspector. The mear fact that you are with us means that you are trying to .,�.:.. PLANNING BOARD � 32 NOVEMBEE�3 , 1990 subdivide the property and the scoping session must have been � Cabout that subdivision property. Yes or no? Mr. Hanauer: When we received the positive declaration with a letter from Mr. Orlowski, we questioned it because we wanted to talk about it. That' s what we wanted to talk about. Mr. McDonald: It must have been about a subdivision though, it couldn' t have been about anything else. Mr. Kapell: What it all boils down to if we were taken by complete surprise that after two years of attempting to pursue the subdivision and complying with the various requests that had been made of us to supply information in order for the board to advance the subdivision that we were at that point advised that , the wetlands, that underwater area was going to be deleted from the density calculation. That' s the problem, that' s the hub of it. Had we been advised of that at the onset, that the position that the zoning board had taken that it should be included was not going to be respected by this board, other avenue' s might have been considered at that point. What the beef is here is that that wasn't put forward and then as a result a considerable amount of time and expense were expended by the applicant. That' s the issue and that is where the question of fair play arises. So now what we are saying to you I think, is that rather than go ahead now and spend another several thousand C dollars on the draft environmental impact statement, and five hundred dollars or whatever the new fee is to apply to the Zoning Board for a variance, knowing that that variance application has to come back before this board for recommendation. If you guys are going to recommend against it. Mr. McDonald: Well, I for one will not give a recommendation before the time that they ask for it. I don' t even know what you are going to go in front of them with. You can tell me here but that' s no guarantee of what is going to come from them. I am not going to put myself in the position of telling you something before I really even know what it is. I understand you are trying to operate in good faith but from my standpoint how can I possibility do that. You want me to tell you all the answers in advance and I won' t do it. Mr. Kapell: I think essentially what, and I don' t want to take your chair Mr. Like, but I think essentially what we are asking you for is to give consideration to the fact that we were encouraged to pursue this application on the assumption that the position of the Zoning Board had taken with regard to the underwater land would be respected. That is really what it boils down to. Now the question is, can we pursue it on the original assumption? If not, then I think it is up to Mr. Like and Mr. Hanauer. � Mr. Like: I would like to suggest that you confer with the Town Attorney on this particular matter and see whether or not he _ _ _ PLANNING BOARD � 33 NOVEMBE�3 , 1990 feels there isn' t some way that this can be resolved at the � CPlanning Board level if he feels not, if he feels that you are powerless then we will understand. If he feels that you are powerless but we have some equity based on the presentation that we have made then we would hope that we would get a favorable recommendation for the Board of Appeals. We don' t plan on making any drastic changes, we have shown you what we have in mind, whatever we showed you is what we' re going to show the Board of Appeals in terms of seeking their approval. On that basis we were hoping that by meeting with you today, we could have some indication from you without a commitment because certainly you would want to see the final papers before you committed yourself. We need to have some encouragement before we go ahead and spend a lot more money and time on this. Mr. Orlowski: Well, I think the board has agreed that our hands are tied as far as what we can do and I think that you will have to go to the Zoning Board of Appeals. We will talk with our Town Attorney. Mr. McDonald: Should Mr. Like actually discuss it with the Town Attorney? Mr. Orlowski: Well, he has that option and I would like to discuss it with him first also. 2 don' t see that we can do C anything. This board has made no decision one way or the other for or against, I 'm sure we are going to have to want for a impact statement and make our recommendations after that. Mr. Like: You do understand that we are reluctant to present you with a impact statement. Mr. Orlowski: I do. Mr. Like: When we know that you will not give two lots. Mr. Orlowski: Well, we can't. Mr. Like: Whether you can do it or not is in my book something to be discussed with the Town Attorney. Mr. Orlowski: When you go to the Zoning Board of Appeals is when you are going to have to prove a hardship of some sort. Mr. Like: Well, I think $130. 000. 00 bucks is a hell of a hardship. Mr. McDonald: You will not proceed to a decision from them without the SEQRA. I mean, they will not do it without the SEQRA process. � Mr. Kapell: Nobody proposes to evade the SEQRA process, that is not the issue. PLANNING BOARD • 34 NOVEMBER� , 1990 � Mr. McDonald: What I am saying is, almost any route you take � except simply forget it, you are going to have to do this. Mr. Like: It is a matter of timing. If we are told by the Board of Appeals, we approved your variance but you still have to go through the SEQRA process. Mr. McDonald: No, no, they will not, they cannot do that. They can' t take any action without that in place. It will be done before they make any determination what so ever. Otherwise, it won' t be legal. Now, I hope you get in touch with the Town Attorney, I would look forward to the Town Attorney' s comments really. It is interesting. Mr. Y.apell: I think really what the question of hardship revolves around is this assumption that the Zoning Board of Appeals oriqinal position with regards to whether or not the wetlands were going to be included. Mr. Orlowski: The Zoning Board of Appeals assumption and our policy can be two different things. Mr. McDonald: If that is the case, they would take that into account in their decision. Mr. Kapell: You are both under the same roof. We're on the � outside. You are all under the same roof, I don't think it is unreasonable for an applicant to assume that two boards in the same town would have some coordination. Mr. McDonald: Coordination yes, but that does not necessarily mean that we are going to either be in agreement or that we would completely overlap what we are doing. Mr. Kapell: But let me say in all fairness there was never any correspondence from this board or anything on the record to indicate that this board disagreed with the ZBA's determination. We were lead along for two years filing these various documents and the first indication that this board was not going to honor the ZBA's position with regard to that question was when the positive declaration came along two years after we applied. That is the problem. Mr. Hanauer: Why did you put us all through those steps? Mr. McDonald: What we don' t have the power to do, we can't do. I mean I would love to be able to just kind of solve problems like that but other people have authority in certain areas and I will not infringe on their authority anymore than 2 would allow them to do ours. The ZBA cannot subdivide property. We wouldn' t allow it but at the same extend the kind of relief you need under the code comes from them. It really comes from � them. Now, if the Town Attorney has an opinion that is really different to that and it is his opinion and he has case behind PLANNING BOARD • 35 NOVEMBEF�3 , 1990 it and it is a general agreement, I don't think we are close to � ! that but, on the basis of what I read I just don' t see where we � have it to do for you. We just don' t have that power to do it for you. Mr. Like: You have the power to recognize the equities in the situation. You have the power after having heard the equities in the situation to make an appropriate comment to the Board of Appeals. That you do have the power to do because that is recommendatory and that the Board of Appeals either considers it or doesn't consider it and I take it they take seriously what you tell them. You now have a better understanding of the hardships that have been opposed upon this applicant and how they have arisen and I think that we are not asking too much of you to give serious consideration to making a positive recommendation to the Board of Appeals. We will then go forward and do what we have to do with the Board of Appeals including whatever SEQRA documentation is required. Mr. Orlowski: Any recommendation from this board will not come through until the SEQRA process in finished. You are on a very fragile area there and there are a lot of guestions to be answered. When you say you can build a house without any impact, that is what you are going to have to prove and this board would want to see that. The Zoning Board will ask for our recommendation and we will make our recommendation and they are C going to decide whether it is a hardship. I mean, we are out of it and we haven' t made a recommendation to deny or approve this one way or another since day one and what you say was a delay well, maybe it was or maybe it wasn' t but you waited another year and a half to come back and tell us that we were dragging our feet. 2 think that the way the code is written right now you have to go to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Like: You said the rug was pulled out from under this applicant you know suddenly and without warning after he spent a lot of money and was led to believe based on what the Town Attorney has said and what the Board of Appeals have said that you count it and then you have a change that says you can' t count it and that is the classic situation where courts of law say there are equities here which should be respected and what we are saying to you is that you believe you don't have the power then the very least you can do is to say to the Board of Appeals, this applicant has an equity and the Planning Board assuming your satisfied with the environmental analysis we' ll recommend he be granted his variance. We will take care of the financial part. We will demonstrate to the Board of Appeals what the financial injury is going to be but it would certainly be helpful for the Planning Board to make some comment which is not negative to our chances before the Board of Appeals. Mr. McDonald: I think our determination is going to be built on � planning considerations the equity won't enter into it. That is PLANNING BOARD � 36 NOVEMBEP�i , 1990 a job for the Zoning Board of Appeals. There' s criteria that � Chas been handed down under who knows how many court cases. Mr. Like: I have been going before Planning Board' s for the past twenty years and you can't tell me that the Planning Board is unmindful of (inaudible) that is simply not true. Mr. McDonald: The recommendation we' re qoing to send to them is going to be based on Planning consideration. They will entertain the equity question. That is their job and that is really their job, that' s their expertise. In this case we' re not going to substitute our jobs for this, we' re going to look at this on a planning basis. That' s what they ask us our recommendation on. They don' t need our opinion on the equity of it, there are going to actually ma'ce a determination. They are going to u�e their judgement to make this determination, net ours in that matter and we' re going to comment on the planning aspects of it. I think if you have case, go. If you have it then you will win. If you do not, you will not. Mr. Like: Are there any other questions you have at this point? Mr. Orlowski: Not right now. We ' ll talk with the town attorney. CMr. Hanauer: How do we address the drainage? Ms. Scopaz: Can I make one suggestion. I think it would be useful for the record if you would condense your presentation in a letter, if you can present your presentation that you made earlier this evening into writing and this way we can use that as the basis for our discussion with the town attorney. In other words he would have something in writing so that we are all talking about the same thing and it would also be in the file for the record that you're pursuing this matter and I think that that would just be useful just to make sure that in our discussion with the town attorney that we' re touching on the same points that your touching. Mr. Like: Could I get a transcript �of the tape which will be helpful to me in composing such a summary. Mr. McDonald: It will take time. Mr. Like: If you' ll furnish me with a transcript it would be a great help. Could you give me a copy of the tape? Mr. MCDonald: With our facilities 2 would'nt absolutely count on it. Mr. Latham: Let's keep the thing going one way or the other. ` Mr. Like: Thank you. _ _ PLANNING BOARD � 37 NOVEMBE�3 , 1990 Mr. Hanauer: We didn't discuss the drainage? How do we � Cresolve the drainage? Mr. McDonald: If there was a subdivision, assuming you got through the ZBA and you had whatever variances, whatever drainage problems existed on the site would have to be dealt with within the Planning process. At that time, I would think in conjunction with the Highway Department that we would be able to solve the drainage problem. We have to solve the drainage problem. Then, I think that would finally fall into our laps. We would count highly on the Highway Department and their comments on the subject and our consultant as well. Mr. Hanauer: You' ll be looking into that in the meantime? Mr. McDonald: No, for anything you've submitted we would have to send to the consultants and they would want money for that, for the reviews and to do it before there was anything in the way of approvals would be premature. Mr. Hanauer: I mean regardless, even if we didn' t get the approvals we still have the drainage problems. Mr. McDonald: If it' s not a subdivision, we no longer have any power over it. I 'm not denying the problem no matter how you look at it. It' s whether we have the power to do anything about C it. As a subdivision, the drainage would be in purview but as a lot, it is not within our purview anymore. We no longer have any power over it. Mr. Hanauer: Who would then? Mr. McDonald: The Highway Department. Mr. Like, Mr. Hanauer, Mr. Kapell: Thank you very much. Being there was no further business to come before the board, the meeting was adjourned at 8: 30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ��-� /C �/'%/✓,i/�n��_ (/ Jane Rousseau, A � Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Cha' an ` � C�iAMER, V R OCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS � June 15 , 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Planning Board Town of Southold i, -. . Town Hall , 53095 Main Road •� P.O. Box 1179 ' ; ', soutr,oia, xew York iis�i ;;_� ��N � 9 ��g a `--_�.__: ; _ RE: Scoping Meeting for SUUTFlq�v pyy,�y--••� DEIS Hanauer & Bagley @ Southold PL�Nr,tp!��gp��y SCTM #1000-50-6-4 ` Dear Benny: As per our discussion of yesterday, a scoping meeting was scheduled to be held on June 12 , 1989 at the Southold Town Hall , for the above referenced action. However, the scoping of the DEIS was not accomplished for the following reasons: * The apglicant objected to the Positive Declaration, claiming sufficient information had be provided. * The applicant wishes to have the Poaitive Declaration rescinded. * The applicant feels the proposed parcels have sufficient square footage to conform to the zoning. ( ie. disagrees with the Town' s gosition that underwater land cannot be used in computing lot square footage requirements) * The applicant feels that the Zoning Board of Appeals should first act on the lot area variance, if appropriate. He wishes the Planning Board to render a decision on the need for a variance. Those present at the meeting were: Milton Bagley Applicant Kenneth C. Coenen Hampton-Manor Associates, Inc . (Consultant to Applicant) Page 1 of 3 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 � i • ' � Hanauer & Bagley Scoping Meeting Thomas W. Cramer, ASLA Cramer, Voorhis & Associates (Consultant to Lead Agency) Mr. Hanauer Applicant David E. Kapell Real Estate Agent Melissa Spiro Planning Board Staff The need Por the DEIS was explained to all present, as well as the relevent procedures and the rules and regulations of SEQR. After about 45 minutes the meeting ended, with no scoping of the document (at the applicant ' s request) and the applicant wishing the Board to render the above cited decision. In light of the above we would like to make the following observations and suggestions , based on the rules and regulations oY SEQR: 1 . IP a variance is required for the proposed lot areas , then the Zoning Board of Appeals would also be an Involved Agency, according to SEQR ( 617 . 2 (t) ] . 2 . If, through the establishment of Lead Agency, the Planning Board did not contact the ZBA, the Planning Board should coordinate the additional involved agency (ZBA) for the Lead Agency status [617 .6 (d) ] . 3 . The Planning Board should once again seek Lead Agency status based on the criteria for determining lead agency contained within SEQR [617. 6 (5 ) ] . 4 . The Planning Board, after re-establishing Lead Agency should re-affirm the Positive Declaration with the involved agencies , based on the criteria for determining significance (617 . 11 ) . No agency ( including the ZBA) can issue a decision on an action which the lead agency has issued a determination that it may have a significant effect on the environment, until after the SEQR grocess is completed [617 . 3 (a) ] . 5 . While scoping of the DEIS document is optional , the Board should seek input on the acope from the CRAMER, V R SOCIATES Page 2 of 3 ENVIRONMEN G CONSULTANTS _- � � . Hanauer k BaSley Scoping Meeting ZBA, and contact the applicant to set up a new scoping meeting . IY the applicant does not wish to attend a scoping meeting, a written scope of issues should be prepared, in a timely manner, and supplied to the applicant (617 . 7 ) • 6 . If the applicant does not exercise the option to prepare the DEIS, the Lead Agency shall prepare it , cause it to be prepared, or terminate its review of the action [617 . 8 (a) l • We hope the above has been helpful to the Board in the consideration of the action. If we can answer any questions concerning the above or supply any additional information please feel free to contact us. Very trul mas W. Cramer, ASLA Page 3 of 3 CRAMER, V R SOCIATES ENVIRONMEN G CONSULTANTS ,� , _--_ . �_. . r . ,. . ,. r :... _-._,�..- . . . � � a4c�,1EFQ(�-� �g Town Hall, 53095 Main Road �d � P.O. Box 1179 � # '�� Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE � (Sl6) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: All Involved Rqencies FROM: Southald Planning Baard RE: Hanauer & Bagley SCTM �1000-50-6-4 Date: June 5, 1989 A positive declaratiQn was declazed on this application oa May 15, 1989. A copy of which was mailed to you. A scoping session has taeen set for Monday, June 12, 1989 at 2: 00 p.m. If you wish to attend ar send co�nents, please notify this office at 765-1938. enc. cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Environmental Conservation, SB Suffolk CouIIty Department of Planninq Judith Terry, Tawn Clerk Cramer, Voorhis fi Associates, Inc. Building Department Trustees Zoning Soard of Appeals Applicant Planning Hoard � .�.�A2.L'nQ3Yl')� � J'y fS. V 7:A .1>r l P �) '1 l��l �� . �� ' � 7s 2[� �� '� �Mp ��Id Town Hall, 53095 Main Road i �� ' �? � •C',,�f,' P.O. Box 1179 ��` �1� '3 ;� ��;}�'` Southold. New York 1 1971 .... TELEPHONE (S l6)765-I938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD D1ay 22, 1989 David Kapell P.O. Box 463 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Hanauer & Bagley SCTN! #1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Kapell: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 15, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board make a determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act of a significant effect on the environment. (See enelosed Positive Declaration) . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. , Ver ruly yours, �(S/ � ..IiYt/�[��' '' . BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN cc: Kenneth Coenen enc. jt � „�yzU�.. � ;yi�' "�"�,?�. " i' ji I {;i� ..'+ '�,, { ,,,' ( "`"°"'*, ' � .r.. �� a \�.y ��l� . . 'J' �� t s�� y �! � E r, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road �'�%'', ' �`'� � ��;'%'i P.O. Box 1179 �. '�r1 °� ',: =� 'y Southold. New York 1 1971 �;-y;,i;,;a.r' iELEPHONE (5I6)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD O5/23/89 POSITIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Article S of the Environmental Conservation Law _ State _Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR part 617, Section 617.10 and chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency for this unlisted action described below has determined that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. NAME OF ACTION: Sue Hanauer and Joan Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4. SEQR STATUS: Type I Unlisted V DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant proposes to subdivide a 4.945 acre parcel into 2 lots, 2. 466 acres and 2.479 acres respectively. This parcel is zoned A-C (Agricultural Conservation) . It is located on Sound View Avenue at Southold. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: The Planning Board has reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment Form, has completed Parts II and III, and has conducted a field Inspection of the site. Based on the above, the Planning Board has determined that: The proposed action has the potential of having a significant impact to the physical characteristics of the project site. There may be an effect on the existing freshwater pond and CONTINUED � � wetlands on the site due to the proximity of the proposed construction. The proposed action will involve construction within the required setback from a freshwater body. There may be an effect on the existing freshwater pond and wetlands on the site due to the fact that the proposal includes private wells within 70 feet and individual sewage disposal systems within 100 feet. The upland area of the subject premises does not meet the minimum lot area requirement for two dwellings. CONTACT PERSON Further information can he obtained by contacting Jill M. Thorp, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk county Planning Commission Robert Greene, DEC Commissioaer Mohabir Perseud, Department of State Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. James Schondehare, Town Attorney Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Board of Appeals Board of Trustees --- - Applicant Planning Board � � a�'�I SZEPATOWSKI /15SOCIATES INC. e d' ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS& LANDUSE PLANNERS aX7 __.__ .. . . . _. --- , April 13, 19�9 ''` , •a k � ��' �Wk � Z � `s F Melissa Spiro SOU7HOLDTO�NN ° Planner pIANNINGBOARD ; Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision Hanauer/Bagley Dear Kelissa: Enclosed please find a completed LBAF Parts II and iII for the above mentioned subdivision proposal. Also enclosed is a recommended declaration for the Board' s considezation. If you have any questiona, please don' t hesitate to call. Sincerely SZEPATOWSRI P►SSOCIATES, INC. � hl I� .�� i Diane M. 3chultze Planner DMS:jlm enc. 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (�01)423-0430 Office (401)423-0037 Fax T_-'. _. _ . � �,_ �.. � . . _ . , ��.� _.�. . � � .n--e , � r ' ,;:,62 (2r,971-7c p ' `�� , � „ . s��.2� ( APR I 7 1989 seoR Append(x A State Environmental �uality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT F R <i::`:`. ' � etF,�tr.n,; Purpose: The fvll EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a projett or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also undenrood that those who determine significance may have litde or no formal knowledge oi the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concems affecting the question of-significance = '-� " The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly. comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAf Componenls: The full EAF is tomprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and infarmation about a Qiven project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: It any impact in Part 2 is identifiPd ac n�!enti�l�y-laige, then Part 3 is used to evaluare whether or not the impact is actually important DETERMINATION OF SIGNIfICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions o( EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 CX Part 2 �Part 3 � Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 'I and 2 and 3 if appropriateJ, and any other supporting , information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: G A. The project w111 not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a signit�cant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [j{ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effea for this Unfisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been requ�red, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.• � C The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on thr em-ironment. therefore a positive dedaration will be prepared. ' A Condrtioned ��?gati<�e Declaration is onl�� valid ior llnlisted Actions Mino� Subdivi�ion_ for Sue Hanauer and Joan Bacrlev �A,imi� o� Achon Town of Southold Planning Board ___ _ — ---- �a�,. „• i ,. .,�+ ,�,;��c� � Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman _ .. - --- _ _ _ — -- __------- -- -- ------ Pnni �u 1�{.�� ..�. �. � r' � �. , � 1 . � . � . i . .. .. . 1 t, � � . Fr . . . ,,,� t 1.• . , Si�;nahirr ot R�•.; u.�f.�l� i1;��.� �.r �n Le�ad Agrr„ � C��naturt�otF'r��pamr(Ifditfe�renttromre>ponsibleoifkerj . _. .._.__.._. _.-----_._--�-'---- —� . __ I1nio � Y _ . .,.�.�,�_..�..�..r._,�.� �, � -��... _ _ Part 2—PROJEC�PACTS AND THEIR MAGNITU� . Responsibility of Lead Agency � " Genenl Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonablet The reviewer is noE expecred to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. �dentifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. . • The E:amples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are genera�ly applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, Ihus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhauscive list of impacts and threshoids to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance ot each question. • In identitying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. ' instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Smail to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated 8y IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change � . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site7 ❑NO �'IYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 f� ❑ �]Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than � � �Yes ONo 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more � ❑ ❑Yes �No than one phase orstage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of naWral marerial (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No , • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ �Yes ❑No ' • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yez ❑No 2. Will there be an effect t�. ...ry ur:.que or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etcJONO �]YES • Specific land forms: freshwater pond and wetlands � �] C�Yes ❑No - 6 . _ —.,� � _�� _� � __�__�___� ... . . . ��::... .,�. �,�-.� _�.. ! 'r " .� 1 2 3 Small to Pat�ntial Can Impact Be tMPACT ON WATER Moderate !arge Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any N-ater body designated as protecFed? �mpact Impact Project Change (Under Artides�5, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO S]YES Exampks that would appiy to column 2 ' , • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than '100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution fatilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • tonstruction in a designated freshwater or tidal wedand. 0 ❑ �Yes �No • Othe� ITp3ft5: (`�nc+rnr+inn �ui+}iin "3f1 fPPI' nf a ❑ � �Y25 ❑NO freshwater wetland 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body ot water? ONO [�YES Ecamples that would apply to column 2 • A '10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ � ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds'10 acres of surface area. � ❑ �Yes ❑No • Other impacts: constructson of dwellinqs with ❑ � �Yes ❑No private wells and isds within 100 feet of s. �#�o��sg��c�c�o�daf��s��t�ag�o�°�"ro�iii�FSat�Pdy of water . _ quality or quantity? ONO �YES E:amples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Actioi� will require a discharge permit. � � �Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ � �Yes ❑No . have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requir?s water supply from welis with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. �. • Proposed Sction will adverse'� affect groundwater. ❑ � ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid eifluent will be conve�-•�.'off the site to facilities which presently ❑ � ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Propo�ed Action would use water in excess ef 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day. • Proposed ?ction Nill likelv ct.us� siltation or other diycharge into an ❑ � �iYes ❑No existing body of w�ter tc u ? Pxte�:t that there will be an ob�ious visual contrast -o naturai conditions • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical � ❑ ❑Yes uNo products greater than 1,'100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allov. residential �ses in areas �+ithout water ❑ � d]Yes ❑�o andlor se�•er services. • Propr,sed Action locate�.. iommerual andlor industnal uses �.�hich mav ❑ ❑ G'Yes ❑�o require new or e*pamion n( eusting �rasle lreatment and or ciorage facihhes • Other impacts-____.. — ❑ ❑ rl'es r'Ko 6 Wi�l propo>ed action alte•r drainage CoH or pattems, or wrface �.a�Pr runoffl ❑NO �'YLS [::. �iples lr.at would apP�Y to column : • Prt��ii�d Attion N�ould change fiood wa:er �lo�+s � �— ��ei CnO , � ____.._.....�.� � _.. _. . .. . � , : � .. ____._,.. � n __ �. � . � � .. . .. 1 - 2 3 • Small to Potenti2t Can Impacl Be Moderate Larpe Mitipated By Impact Impact ProJect Chanpe • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosioa ❑ � �Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage pattems ' ❑ " Q �Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will ailow development in a designated floodway. D � OYes �No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality7 �NO �YES Eaamples that would apply to column 2 ' • Proposed Action wiil induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given • ❑ ❑ �Yes ❑No ' hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than '1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per houc • E�nission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ibs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per houc • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial � ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ O OYes ❑No ' IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS g Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? S�O OYES Ezamples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction o( one or more species listed on theNew York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes �No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removz' of any portion of a critical or significant Wildlife habitat. ❑ � ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than tor �Qricultural purposes. • Other impacts: O O ❑Yes ❑No 9 N'ill Proposed Aclion substaniially aHect non4hreatened or non•endangered species� ��O �YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed I.ction would substantiaity imerfere with any resident or � ❑ �Yes ❑No migratory tah, shellhsh or N�ildlde species • Proposed Act�on requires the remo��al o( more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑�o ot mawre (orrst (o��i�r '100 ��ars of age) or other Iocally �mportant � ��setation - IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL I.AND RESOURCES 10 V�'ill �ho Propo>�•d Ac tion niti•rt agriculWral land resources� �NO C'�f S E.amp�es the� �+ould apply to column 2 • lhr proposed auion �+ould <��'o�, ero5s or hmn access to agncultural C ❑ ❑1'es ❑No . ' Iand (mcludi•s eropland, ha�lield�, pasture, vine�ard, orchard, etr 1 . 8 � -�-- 3 . . ^�S AC ' aN TRRNSPORTATION Small to Pa4e� tia Can Impact Be 14. Will • e e . ��e o existing transportation systems? Moderate Lar �e Mitigated By �CXTlO ❑YES �mpact imp +ct Project Change Ecample � . u'd oly to eolumn 2 , ---' • Alteral�c n ir i � t F �ms of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ �_ ❑Yes ❑No � • Propose�:'�. -�c� n � I n . t in major traffie�problems. . ❑ �- ❑Yes ❑No • Other �r,�::� . __ = ❑ L ❑Yes ❑No Ip!� 4CT ON ENERGY 15. Will �•rc :�� r a tio ffect the community's sources of fuel 0.� energ, : _i{, � L�NO ❑YES - EramG�les . 3 r ule ; ply to eolumn 2 • Proposesi - c � + I c ? a greater than 5°o increase in the use of 7 �. ❑Yes ❑No � any fo�r: c � � ; � in municipality. - • Propose,� c' � � I n re the creation or extension of an energy ❑ �_ ❑Yes ❑No transmis<ic i . � 'y s m to serve more than SO single or two family residencas o . r �e ajor commercial or industrial use. • Other ir�,: :c . __ _ ❑ [: OYes ❑No ��I:'f 4ND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Wili the e E ! ec able odors, noise, or.vibration as a result ot the P e: c \ct t�;INO ❑YES Ezamples tv � : iid dy ro column 2 • BlastinE; v,�r i ` )C� of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ I_ ❑Yes �1No facility • Odors �� d c � � utii (more than one hour per day). ❑ C ❑Yes ❑No • proposed �� ill juce operating noise E�Kceeding the local ❑ �_ ❑Yes C)No ambient n i, I � c fc oise outside oi structures. • Proposr.;l i� _ � ill ,� ove naWral barriers that would act as a ❑ �_ ❑Yes �7No naise sre�a�n • Other �moe� � _ __ � I_' ❑Yes UNo kF'< : ON PUBLIC HEALTH V Will f r. � � � tio fect public health and safety? I �10 OYES E:amG,l� ; a + ol< Ply to column 2 ' • Proposr�:! .c r � y c e a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ I. I ❑Yes C7No ' substar.� e (� �ecl es, chemicals, radiatron etc.)in the event of accider�� r r � an ons, or there may be a chronic low level ' distharE��r �r i �� r� �'�. • Propose:l ,c � ' ,� r t in the burial oi "hazaidous was[es" in any � �_ ❑1'es ��No fOrm (i e L � � ( 7ise �s, hlghly reactive, radioactive, irritating, � ��. infectic,.:s e. J �,.. • Storage f.: _-� �� ( r c �nillion or more gallons of liiquified natural ❑ ��_ . ❑Yes ��No '�. gas or o��.h��r a � i 361 �uids. 'i • Proposed a� � r a, �It m the ezcavation cr other disturbance ❑ C , ❑Yes ❑NO ; within 2,0� 0 � r z used foi the disposai oi solid or hazardous i waste � • Oth�r i-n��a � r. . _ __ . . ..-.. . . ❑ I_ � ❑Yes ❑No j .—__ . _. ._..— __. . . 10 . ro+ . L Tu - ., ._ _._ � ..� � . .... ._.._. . .... ^ � .�v.�: ._. ...;:y..y_... .y{..... . • 1 2 3 IMPkCT Or, GROWTH ANU CHARACTER Smali to Potential Can Impact Be I pF (;pM�`.UNITk OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderaie Large Mitigated By 18. Willproposed action affect [hecharacterof theeaistingeommunity? �RjpaCl IrtlpeCt Project Change �, ONO �.�'ES Ezamples that would appl�� to column 2 .� . � ❑Yes ❑No • The permaner.: populztion c f the city, town or village in wh�[h the ❑ � - project is locz!e� is li4.ely tc grow by more than 5%. �� ❑Yes ❑No • The municipal budget for c.+pital expenditures or operating services __� ❑ will increase by more +han 5% per yeai. as a result of this projett.` � � ❑Yes ❑Nc ' --•-Proposed actfon H�ill conflice-with�officially adopted piansor goals. . . .� ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause .: change in the densiry of-land u�e. � � ❑yes �No • Proposed Action will �f placc or eliminate existing latilities, itructures ' ❑ � or areas of historic impor[ance to the community. . � OYes ❑No • Development will crezre a demand for additional community services ❑ (e.g. schools, police a �d firc, etcJ �Yes �No • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ � � ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. O ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts:_.-- 19 I� there, or is there likely to be public controversy related to Fotential adverse environmental iropacts? ❑NO �]YES None as of March 28 , 1989 It Ana Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Poteniiai Large impaci or If You Cannot Deiermine the Magnitude ot Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part ��—EVALUATIO�! OF TtiE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS ResponsibilitY of l.ead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if nne or more impact(s) �s considered to be polentially large, even i( the impact(sj may be mitigatcd. Instructions Discusc the follo�+�inF for ea_h impact identified in Column 2 ot Part 2�. 1 Bnefly descrioe th�� imp� ct. 2 Descrlbe(if applicz'�le)hc w the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project chan�;e;s). 3 Based on the info matio� available, dec�de if i� is reasom ole to conclude that this impact is important. To ans�vcr the question of importance, consider. • ThF proba bility �f the impzct occurring • The durat on of the impaet - • Its irrrver�.ibilit�, including perman�nl!•: lost reso�..rces ot �alue • 11'hether �he im�acl ean or �eill be co�trolled . • lhe regio ial coisequ«:nce of the impact • hs poieni al dnergenr.e (rom local needs and �go.��ls • \�'heiher �.no�+�n object�ons to the projoct relate �,> lhi� impacl (Continue on attac`imt�nts) _ . --- -- ------- ---- — — -.. _ __ _ � - .__. �, . ._ . �.._. �.� . . ��: .�y _ - ._.. .,�,L., .,...•. . �_� :.:,� .�" • �.. .. �� , _. _ �,�.,� 1 2 3 Smali ta Potentiai Can Impact E3e Mnderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change . ; _ ,rr ,� �, azca.ace ci compa::t �h� so ' ;�iofile of ❑ 0 ❑Yes ❑No +��:'�.; �.. tur:�� . �. . • 1 �:�� •o�,c�.�� , � � �� reve�s�bly comert m��n� ;han ��0 acres ❑ ❑ � ❑Yes ❑No . ,��c,:��!.- �. I � r�� catecf in an AgricLltut.� D�str�,ct, more r. �� _ 5 a, �- ri< . � lancl - • 1 � :�p��-<<��. �. . w::� . �� i rupt >r pre�ent instz Ilar.i:n of a��icultural ❑ � ❑ ❑Yes ❑No � � . � �-�an�:�.�� i � -ste - � ;., subsuriace drain lines, outle�. ditches,�� e .� �op;�� , eat i ed tur such meawres (E �:. c.��e a farrP, � < ,. ':� dr„�r � . e�.�� xrezsed runoffl - � . : , -� ir�,; : � -- - ------------ -_ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No wtl �� T :�F ..�:STHETIC RESOURCE" t i pra; � . , , ion t aesthetic reso:irces? 7NG C}}YES iec:s,; - , a d i ual I Af Addendur.i �n �ecc�on 617.21, ��er,r , E.arnples �.� , � � uld . . I � to column 2 � � � . ed ,_ , cr : � :t campunents :�b�ious'�- dii�e ent from ❑ � �Yes ❑No - harp :, i to � r : sur+ound ng land in� p.atte�ns whether , � �� adr ;�� , i �. � I. • �'��-�<<e:i I :� �� , s, � �� ject componenu visible to users of ❑ � �Yes ❑No i- ''.��°ic -e!< u � whi ' .�� I elininate or � gn�=i�aotly reduce their � , ier �' , �sth c �alities of ihat resc�rce. �5 � ��' �o-i � i ��. thi � i resi.��lt in ihe e�-im azt.i::n o� s�.gnificant ❑ U �Yes ❑No .. . . .� �,np n�. � ., via� �� rwn in be impo�tan•. to ihe �n�a. ' + .. � Ir•,p��. . _ . —._ . . —..----------_—_—_ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No h1�ACT Or+ HI >` '�RI^: �' N ) ARCHAEqLOGIGA�. P,ESOURCES 1 tl��. F'rc;�„�=.. .�� tirn - � .ct any Sitr, or c-ructure ��f h�=�oric, pre- ...��onc r. � �,,.,_ �, �. itol . i impnrtancet $J�O �YES [e:.n�pNei ... - . � �Id .. . y to er.,lumn 1 . � �= , � .e;:l .� : �� . r � �ur � � holly or p,�nial.v H�tF.ir nr t.:b�.tantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No �o�� ci, � te lis ed nr�the Sta� : er hatic� , ' Register . ��`or��. .�. .. .. � �, , ip3:i , :i cl�,; � ical ite o tossJ brd Icrate:i �.ithin the ❑ 0 `'ies Onb .. , �.�I,.�. � � , � �e:l ' � i� i ill � r in a � e.rea det��;naled [�s a��i:ive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No { �. I :��. o � , � , � o- �� " YS 5 ter In:enten. + : � iri: , —. - --.._. --------- -._— . __ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo iMi',;( N �; F '� SPACE AND RECREA'fION 9 ' i Pf�,:� �� .. ticn � :t �hD� qU�Nih� or rualii•, o' t �isti�g Or � ..i, •e ri:�r � , . . �s �: ratio�-i;�l oPF.ort..nit ey� . ,.:�-i{�Ies �. �; '! . � ul;l . I to col��mn 2 !_��J L�YES � I' � i- n^a.!.r �� t . cl<; .� � � f a futurc reue:tional o�;po�l�aitl' ❑ Q ,�Yes ❑No ' e, - � �� i�.'-i.�: . o( � � en Sl�a<e �*��po�*.an� to the ro�nmunrty. ❑ � �YeS ❑No . :) �� irnpr� —_. _ —_�___.�----- ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No .. _.._..__. _. . —. . - ---�.—.�_. —. . __. ___. __ . . _._ . -_—n- —_. - __ . ._.. . . .i..:�.�._. . . � ` Part III Imvact on Land• The proposed action will result in a potential large impact to the physical characteristica of the project site. Construction on proposed lot No. 2 will occur on alopes of 158 or greate;. This cannot be mitigated by project change due to the fact that there is already a foundation in place on this lot. There will also be an sffect on the esisting freshwater pond and wetlands on the site due to the prosimity of the propoeed construction to these areas. While this cannot be entirely mitigated by project change, it can be minimized by allorring only one dwelling to be constructed, that being the completion of the dwelling on Lot #2. �uact on Water• The proposed action will have a large impact on the freshwater wetland, particularly since the set back from the wetland line on Lot No. 1 is 5@ feet and the setback on Lot No. 2 is only 30 feet. This can be mitigated by project chanqe. The construction also includes private wells within 70 feet of the freshwater wetlands and individual sewage disposal systems within 108 feet. These private wells will produce a draw down effect on the wetlands and the individual sewaqe disposal systems will introduce additional pollution to the pond. The proposed action will also affect surface and groundwater quality since it requires the use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve the proposed actions. Also, the project will likely cause siltation or other discharge into the exiatinq body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. This can be mitigated by a project change limiting construction to one dwelling only and mitigation measures during construction. The propoaed action will alter surface water runoff by creating more impervious surfaces and elimination of existing veqetation. �Q' SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. �f ENVIRONMENTALENGINEER56lANDUSEPLANNERS ._ � � �p$ct on Plants and Animals: The proposed action could affect non-threatened or non-endangered species in that it may interfere with resident or migiatory wildlife sgecies, particularly in that the freshvater pond is most likely used as a source of drinking water. the pond is also a habitat to a variety of local water species such as ducks, geese, and swans. Imoact on A@sthetic Resources: The propoaed action will affect seathetic resources since the uses are in sharp contrast to the surronnding natural resources. The proposed land use will also be visual to users of aesthetic resources and will eliminate their enjoynent of the aeathetic qualities of those resourcea, as well as elininate the scenic view of the pond which are important to the area. imnact on Onen SDace and Recreation: The proposed action Nill result ia the permanent closure of a future recrestional opportunity which is the use of the pond as an area for bird ratchinq and ice skating. Thia proposal will also cause a �ajor reduction and ultimate elimination of an open space important to the community. ImDact on Growth and Character of Community or Neiahborhood: This proposed action will set an iaportant precedent for future projects, particularly in areas with natural resources such as those present on this site. This action rrould be a diverqence from the local goals and policies of the Town which include preservation of the wetland areas, and natural resources important to the community. The aubject premises contains an upland area barely sufficient for one dwelling. It do�s not meet the minimum lot area require�ent for two dwellinqs. Therefore a subdivision into two conforming lots cannot be accomplished on this parcel. �� SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. �' ENVIRONMENTALENGINEERS&LANDUSEPLANNERS � • From a review of the environmental factors present on this parcel a two lot subdivision would create a severe adverse impact on the pond and its environs. Reduction to one lot only using the existing foundation and using praposed location of well, septic system, and driveway on "Lot 2• , with no clearing within 5@ feet of the pond (ezcept whece it eaists now) , aad no fertiliaed vegetation, including lawn, on the property except for native indigenous species fertilized with slow-release orqanic fertilizers, all taken together would mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest deqree practicable. The best mitigation measuze is the acquisition of this parcel for use as a Town skatinq area since that has been the historic use of the site. The eaisting foundation could then be utilized for an accessory building to the skating area. � SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. �' ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS&LANDUSE PLANNERS -...F-._.r�.�=__.•7..-�-�-^^^--«^-_.....r..a. .,q_w�n �. . .,r,..�x . �..�^�as^'c�s:„�,n,—^a.^" . .-., r :._^ -;-.z,..,.-�v :-.-E+�w�n�s'ie+�'�`a+r -..�_ " ... . a. . . . . " �.. '. .. �.y . .. . .. .� . . .. . .. . . . � � • . . � ib-72-7'12187>-gc .. . . . . " . .. - � . . . �. 1` . . ' SEQR � , - sti�.s� . Appendix F Stale Environmental Ouality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION ` Notice of Determination of NornSignificance Project Number Date 4/11/II9 . . .. . .'.ri� .�y ` This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the impiementing regulations pertaining to A�ticle ,. 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Southold Town Planning Board �' , as lead agency, - has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the � environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. -- Name of Action: Mir�or Subdivision --- — Hanauer and Bagley SEQR Status: Type i ❑ Unlisted (7� Conditioned Negative Deciaration: �Yes ❑No Description of Action: Realty subdivision of 4.945 acres, includinR a 2 . 6 acre pond, into 2 building lots . I i I � , Location: (Include street address and the name of the municipalitylcounty.A location map of appropriate scale is also recommended.) Located at the Southwest corner of Soundview Avenue and Lighthouse Road, Southold, in the Town o£ Southold, County o£ Suffolk. See attached location man. > ,. .:;; . . :� . . - -�- . ,� . : ; . �' � _ . ,.;, 7 � ,• SEQR Negative Declaration � " �, :' Page 2 Reasons SupportFng This Determination: {See 817:6(g) for requirements of this determination;see 617.6(h)for Conditioned Negative Declaration) See Parts II- and II2 attached: This negative declaration is conditioned on the following: • : A reductiQn to one 1ot only using the existing foundation and using the proppsed locatip,n of well, septic system and drivewav on "Lot 2" , No clearinq p+ithin fifte (50) feet of the pond_, (except where it exists now)' and no feritlized vegetation, - - -- - __ -_ including lawn, except for native indigenous species fertilized caith slow-release organie fertilizer. These measures, all taken together, would mitigate environmental •.impacts to the greatest degree possible. • _ _ __ Ii Conditioned Negative Declaration,provide on attachment the specific mitigation measures imposed. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Qhairman Address: Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 Telephone Number: 516/765-1938 For Type 1 Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a Copy of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-0001 Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation Office ot the Chiet Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally j located. Appiicant (if any) Other involved agencies (if any) _ _ _ ,�� ,:. ._ ,.r�� _ - ' � � . _ . . _ � � � � .� . w.�eo _.... souwo� .._ . . � � � . . . - �OM4 � - � _ � . . . � � � � � ��. � . . " � � '� .�� - _. . ._ _ _. . . . � � fOUMD Y„M . .. . . _. . _. . .. �. . . 4 _ ,-< Y�� _ _�_ � _ _ � � . . . y . . . _ f . . .. _ . 4 'J�� J�4� I�� • I '� d�v f� . . . . __. . s � ,/ \ 10 C AT� i SCALE� 1��=600� MINOR SUBDIVISION PROPOSAL HANAUER AND BAGLEY :��.. �.� ,.-.�. �.�..,�_._ _ . ��, � ---_ p � L� B � I� � � o� o i�1�1 �� $OUTHOLDTOWN �►$gOC1ATES INC PLANNING BOARD 3 D E S I G N E R S 130 WOODBURY RQ4D WOODBURV NY 11797 516�692�4404 March 29, 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr . , Chairman Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall , 53095 Main Road P. 0 . Box 1179 Southold , New York 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski : Re : Proposed Minor Subdivision Hanauer-Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4 With regard to the above minor subdivision , Mr. Kappel submitted , at the end of January , the information that you requested in your letter of October 25, 1988. Last Friday, I stopped in at the Planning Board to see what the status was , only to find out that the information you obtained the end of January just Nent out to Mr. Emilita a few days ago. This accounts for another two-month delay , and I Nould appreciate your expediting the procedures . Thanking you for your attention to this matter , I am Very y ours� � Sanford anauer � SH : cdk cc : David Kapell �' � ,i�,°`i.:%F.?'<y»� � �� i�, J.1 ,�.' s �y� A� S`�y� ^ `4 ti , � . � i"�µn4 �. . ��,. v � :. ,� i r � "' P T( Town Hall, 53095 Main Road �4�. �'S �,w�� j P.O. Box 1179 �'��/ ?y r��' Southold,New York 1 1971 � , :::�:::J='" 7e�srHoxe (S l 6)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUI'HOLD ' March 22, 1989 David Emilita, AICP Szepatowski Associates Inc. 23 NarYagansett Ave. Jamestown, Rhode Island 02835 RE: Minor Subdivision of Hanauer & Bagley SCTM#1000-50-6-4 Dear Dave: I Enclosed please find the response of the applicant to your review dated September 26, 1988. The applicant submitted the enclosed to our office in February. The Planning Board was reviewing a Title Search for the pareel, and the enclosed was inadvertently not sent to you. Please review as soon as possible. Thank you in advance for your assistance. ry tru y s�c..+�"'.v � �� ..Gp'C�st ' BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN enc. � � � KAPELL REAL ESTATE, INC. 400 Front Street Post Office Box 463 Greenport, New York 71944 R � �� f? BRANCH OFFICES 516-477-0100 D L5 16�� 2 `; �� 13 21 North Feny Road,Box 1009 _�;� She/ter Ieland,New Yo�k 11964 E �sie»nv-oioo � ' . _ 6 1989 ;t_, 10 Flandera Road,Box 1771 Riverhead,New York 11901 �,-.�,�- i � `r,,''.V (516) 369-0100 - ` _',�i_;.;;;D March 4 , 1989 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold , N.Y. 11971 Re: �MinQr`� ��Subd�.vision o£ Hanauer & Bagley SC�M -#1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr . Chairman : In connection with the above referenced subdivision , refe- rence is made to my letter dated 'January 27 , 1989 . My clients have asked me to inquire as to the review of the items submitted at the time . � Our original submission of the long form environmental asessment requetsed by your board was made on August 24 , 1987 . The review of same has been extraordinarily protrabted and my clients are anxious to bring this project to fruition . We would appreciate anything you can do to expedite this matter for us . Very truly yo s , �� David E. Kapell as agent � � KAPELL REAL ESTATE, INC. 400 Front Street Post Office Box 463 Greenport, New York 11944 r-- ----� -- ' -; ;a c I) -y7 ' �a. BRANCHOFFICES �J�6-477-�7�� e j LS �j �l Ij ��! �y f ry j 21 North Fecry Road,Box t009 '� ' , ;� Shelror Isiand,New York 11964 �� (516) 749-0100 �� - ' -, - '� 10 Flanders Road,Box 1771 � � Riverhead,New York 11901 (516) 369-otoo W�.AUNNIN6 BORRD Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . Chairman , Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold , N .Y. 11971 January 27 , 1989 Re : Minor subdivision of Hanauer & Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr . Chairman : Pursuant to your letter dated October 25 , 1986 I submit herewith the following items requested by David Emilita in his review of the Long Form Environmental Assessment filed in connec- tion with the above referenced project : 1 . Revised surveys prepared by Young & Young 2 . Report of Hampton Manor Associates as to presence or lack thereof of any threatened or endangered species . I would appreciate anything which you can do to expedite final review and action on these submissions . Review of our assessment is now in its 18th month . Very truly yours , �I��85wy o�,�s.u.ry T;�IQ. �ea-�.c,h. � esaJ��"'1 ""_ ` David E. kapell as agent . , � � . KAPELL REAL ESTATE, INC. 400 Front Street Post Office Box 463 Greenport,New York 11944 (I� n M 2 BRANCHOFFICES 51��"�� D � �/ � IJ V IS ' � 21 North Fwry Road,Hox 1009 Shelta:laland,New York 11964 � (516) 749-0100 FEB - 3 19�9 10 Flanden Road,Box 1771 Rivaxhead,New York 11901 (516) 369-0100 �c-,�:,�;,;;�, ��HO��W�D Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . Chairman , Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 3anuary 27 , 1989 Re: Mfnor:'�nlodauision of Hanauer & Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr . Chairman : Pursuant to your letter dated October 25 , 1988 I submit herewith the following items requested by David Emilita in his review of the Long Form Environmental Assessment filed in connec- tion with the above referenced project : 1 . Revised surveys prepared by Young & Young 2 . Report of Hampton Manor Associates as to presence or lack thereof of any threatened or endangered species . I would appreciate anything which you can do to expedite final review and action on these submissions . Review of our assessment is now in its 18th month . Very truly yours , � �� David E. kapell as agent • ' � � Hampton-Manor Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 308 � � � � �� Manorville, New York 11949 � FEB — 31989 d,�A; (516) 878-1031 SOUTHOLD TOWN � PLANNING BOARD � January 11, 1989 Ms. Sue Hanauer and Joan Bagley C/O Sanford Hanauer Associates 130 Woodbury Road Woodbury, H. Y. 11994 Re: Minor 3ubdivielon at Lighthouse and 3oundview Southold Dear Ms. Hanauer and Ms. Bagley: This o£fice has reviewed the minor subdivieion plan for the property noted above, and completed field studiea of the flora and fauna Pound on the property. Fi�ld inepections were done on January 9 � 10 of this year with the results noted below. At the time of field inapections, ice covered the pond found on the property which limited the inve�tigations into the aquatic life which could be found in the pond. Additionally, iavsstigations centered on the propoeed lot nuaber 1 of thm minor subdivieion regarding flora nnd fauna as a Youndation is already in place on lot number 2. Ov�rview of Site Conditions The property conaists o£ a total of 4. 945 acras and includes a pond, aipparently mnn made aa evidenced by an earthen dam at the southern end of the pond. The pond supports vegetation consi�ting of flooded shrubs and emwrgent vegetation. A smnll fringe of freshwater wetlands surrounds the western, eouthern and eastern portions of the poad. The northern portion of the pond is bounded by Sound View Avenue with a culvert connecting this pond to a smaller pond on the north side oP the road. Several other culverte were also noted indicating that road runoYf from both Lighthouse Road and Sound View Avenue are directed to this pond. Road runofi from Sound View Avenue and Lighthouse Road may adversely afPect the water quality in the pond. Ad�acent ta the freshrmter vretlande nre wooded uplands __ _ __ � . _ __ _ ; � � � The property has residential development to the north, west and east, while an open, fallow farm field is found to the south o£ the property. Wi1d11Ye populations directly observed coneist primarily of songbirds, although two epecie� of gamebirde were observed and others are likely to inhabit the property at other times of the year. Again, a specific inventory is included below. Flora Inventory The following flora speciee have been identified on the minor subdivieion property o£ Sue Aanauer and Joan Bagley, this list is not to be conaidered a complete site inventory, as field identification of vegetation is limited by the time of year in which the inventory was completed: V�tland Sp�ci�� Clethra alniPolia Sweet Pepperbush Cephanalanthus occidentalie Buttonbuah Vacclnium corymbosum Highbush Blueberry Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle Smilax rotundiflora Catbrier Carex spp. Sedges Juncus spp. or Hlocharie spp. Ruehes IIpiaad Sp�oi�s Quercus rubra Red Oak Quercus velutina Black Oak Quercu� alba White Oak Prunue serotina Wild Cherry Juniperus communis Dwarf Juniper Betula lenta C3rey Birch Betula populifolia White Birch Kalmia latifolia Mountain Laurel Smilax rotundiPlora Catbrier Rabina pseudo-acadia Black Locuet Ilex verticillata � Winterberry Lonicera tatarica Tartarian Honeysuckle Hote: Some species can be Pound in both the freshwater wetland and the vpland habitata. s � � � Fauna $p�eiN Thc+ £ollowing species oY wildlife vrere directly observed on the sub�ect property, or evidence of their use of the property was found. Avian Populatione Parus atricapillue Black-capped Chickadee Parue bicolor TuPted Titmouse Hylocichla mustelina Wood Thrush Cyanocitta cristata Blue Jay Corvus brschyrhynchoa Gommon Crow StUrnue vulgarie Starling Richmond�a cardinalen�ie Cardinal Picoides pube�cens Downy Woodpecker Colinus virglnianus Quail Phasianus colchius Ring-Necked Pheaeant Larus argentatus Herring C3u11 Although not physcially obeerved due to the Prozan conditions of the pond it is aesumed that the pond is habitat to a variety of common local water speciee including ducks and geese during time6 when the poad is open. Additionally, the pond is likely used by a variety of migratory epecies as a resting place and a �ource Yor food. Mammal .Populations The following spec2es were directly observed, or evidence was found of their habitation of the property in queetion. . Odocoileus virginiaaus White-tailed Deer Sylvilegus Floridans Haat�rn Cottontail Scuirus carolinensis Gray Squirrel Additionally, it is likely that raccoons, opoeeum, chipmunks, mice, molee and bats could b� Pound on the property. Ao inventory of reptiles and/or amphibians waa poseible due to the weather condltions, however, it is likely that the pond and surrounding habitat ie the home to a variety af Y • � � � common reptiles snd amphibians, including froga, toada, ealamandere, turtlee and possibly garter snakee. Rare, Threatened and Hndangered Speciee ao direct obeervation of any rare, threatened or endangered epecies wae made on the sub�ect property, nor was the habitat found con�idered to be of such a aature that the existence oY any rare, threatened or endangered species be likely on this property. Summary The sub�ect property ia habitnt to a variety of flora and Paunal apecies, most of whlch are quite common to the area. Ho unusual apeciee were noted during the field inepections conducted. Bo �pecies ooneldered rare, threatened or endangered woere observed, nor was the habitat Pound which would eupport any of the�e specles. This report can be ueed a� you see fit, particularly as a submi�eion to the Town of Southold Planning Board, in compliance with their request�. Should you have any questions regarding tLe content oP thie report, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ��.��._ Kenaeth C. Coenen, AICP Preeident KCC/ cc: David Kapell � yL �;;,�r,�,� i . �,� r,?,� �^,yJ � - ��V L .�( } �I � . { .�;1: � + �ry`i t� �.. � f<• �,.,� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road � ,,"'„ a� ,. � P.O. Box 1179 ��'r� � �� Southold, New York 1 1971 �.1 .-�t +'�',� TELEPHONE (Sl6)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 25, 1988 David Kapell P.O. Box 364 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Proposed minor subdivision of Hanauer & Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Kapell: Enclosed please find David Emilita' s report dated September 26, 1988. The Planning Board requests compliance with the report, specifically with numbers Four ( 4) and Five ( 5) . The Planning Board will proceed with their review upon receipt of this information. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to con�act this office. Ve�truly yours, •V' ��„1 �'i ,//.�yyy � r''�t� � .�'i T / � P � //�'� r' i/ .�� r r / t l �f-7' � t:;::y,�`S��/�� + er'�' /✓r i' �J'r�w p�1'f.d3/_�%� '4.:^'j,��+''-�".�i4 cyv'l..r'7� ,.- `!� BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. .� � CAAIRMAN enc. MS/jt - 'i �;y�, ! ; ;,r� � ,�j`�''� �r�� y�9 �i',� � � �S ! � �7 � Y�� ; :; ,y 1 V'] r➢� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road , ,Y -�„� sy'< �' P.O. Box 1 179 ��%� '�y,,✓ �e'�` Southold, New York 1 1971 ?.�� a :'�� TELEPHONE �'`�+�'r%1"� (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Board of Trustees From: Planning Board RE: Hanauer & Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4 Date: October 25, 1988 Enclosed please find a revised map for the above mentioned subdivision. The Trustees previously inspected the property, however since that time the applicant flagged the wetlands and delineated them on the map. Please see David Emilita' s varification of the flagging. Please review and refer any comments to the Planning Board office. enc. MS/jt � � �5�FF0(,YC p � :� 0 1� FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., Ptesident � � OCT — 3 � 0 ALBERT]. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President N 1�1 '�'ELEpHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III 0 `F (516)765-3892 sour�o�o rowa JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. � M.ANNING 80ARD HENRY P. SMITH �'� � �� BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road � P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 1 1971 October 3, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Aall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed subdivision for Hanauer and Bagley 1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Please be advised that the Town Trustees inspected the above referenced property on September 23, 1988. The Trustees have no objection to this project. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President To��;� �� By: Ilene Pfif e ng, Cle � FAK:ip A r � 9 � s�l � � � SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATE$ INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS & PLANNERS SEP 2 9 � �' SOUTHOL�TOWN p�pNNING BOARD September 26, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53@95 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hanover & Basley Dear Mr. Orlowski, Per your request of 25 August the premises was field inspected again on 14 3eptember with the updated survey dated 2 August 88. Referring to our letter of 16 May 88, I make the following comments. 1. Freahwater wetlands flagged but not numbered either on the survey or in the field. Since I agree with the accuracy of the field flagging and of the placement of the field fla9ging on the survey, this need not be corrected. For the future however, this practice may not prove acceptable. 2. it is assumed all permits on Lot 2 are now in the Planninq Board file. 3. Except for the northeast and southwest corners of Tax Parcel 4, which I could not find due to dense underbrush, all other corners were located. 4. No proposed sanitary system location ace shownt no proposed well on Lot 1 is show, presumably the existing well on Lot 2 will be utilized but no SCDHS permit for it appears in the file copies sent to us; no driveway location for Lot 2 is indicated on the survey; all other information ia okay. 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 - - _ _ � � 5. Species docwaentation is not supplied. The first page of communication dated 25 April 85 from the Land Use Company to Abigail Wickham is not sufficient to complete a Part I or Part iI. 6. Please draw the applicant' s attention to items 4 and 5 above. We are available for any questions. Sincerely, SZEPATOWSRI ASSOCIATES. INC. r�c.t.tr'CIX.(./f .�L• �+/iM.LaC.(dJLC_.(mr'J David J.S. Emi ita, AICP Principal Planner DJSE:mt � � . D�SUEFA1k�,0�� =F.. � � . � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road � P.O. Box 1179 w4,�` �og Southold, New York 1 1971 "��,( �� TELEPHONE . (516)7654938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 25, 1988 David Emilita Szepatowski Associates,Inc. 23 Narragansett Avenue Jamestown, Rhode Island 02835 RE: Proposed Minor Subdivision for Hanauer & Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Emilita: Enclosed please find material submitted for the above mentioned subdivision as per your letter dated May 16, 1988. Please notify us if any additional imformation is needed. V truly yours !/+" �✓ , .GYt/rG , BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN enc: jt � , Qo5�EF0(��,DG� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road � ` � P.O. Box 1179 �0� � O!' Southold, New York I 1971 �'�Ol � � TELEPHONE (S l6)7654938 � PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: The Board of Trustees FROM: The Planning Board RE: Proposed minor subdivision for Hanouer and Bagley � SCTM #1000-50-6-4 DATE: August 25, 1988 Attached please find the map for the above mentioned subdivision. Also find a copy of correspondence from your office dated August 6, 1986 (Please excuse the poor print, we do not have the original) . This letter is not clear as to which lot it refers to. The house shown on the enclosed map on Lot 2 is closer than the 50 ' noted in this letter. Please review and respond. Thank you for your assistence. enc: jt _ ._— _ Ef%x'� 1 �„� 3 0� �S � �2 �I'�'-� �'h�5 i S �w �e� c,�ocs�� .K�.,e�- r+'�q:1 �y T ��-1� �=e-I dt��c l3 KAPELL R L ESTATE, INC. Ov �}- �1�� P-f Cc��' 400 F t Street Q� Post Offic ox 463 O Cov 1�+� d' LOC��/ Greenport, New rk11944 ��-�� Tq� O� � � �r f��wC e `5 6 r1G. �.� 516-477-01 0 � U _,. _. � �,, , {i BRANCH OFF ES (�V w } � �� ` U 21 North Fetry R d,Box 1009 -�-(.� (e �DU L.� K� � �" (�' �� ' � i;�� Shelter Island,New oxk 11964 ` (516) 749-0100 ��T�� ,� I� .d- LO�K �'�C�� I 10 Fianders Road,Box 71 � Riverhead,New York 119 ,�- �� 1 Q� t � '�' Gt,,,C�C.c�� Q�LA NING BO D (516) 369-0100.� . � 1 t�`,S �:N.�.c�,�s '�cQ� � yr�v t� ��5 �4 ��u�eS ��} don'{. �_ a gust ia , i9aa 1,Qos� c� t�;n�.�s . � Mr . Bennett Orlow i , Jr . � Chairman , Southold own Planning ard � , Main Road So�utheold, N.Y. _ 119��,��-�j�-w��„� `� =�� ,��r,p "_ ' .Y.nn R/�e: - Han,�au.e�r✓�-& Bagley et-o I: " �` H.e�6�'�� / TI*�'�.ed ��-� Dear Mr Chpurman • � � wa�7` aiO'�`' ��/ O.�� %�- /`'`''`�'''��.",�/',`/',�,�`' ,�5�' 4N� . In connection wi� tdAe abov / 7 eT�� o�ect tha�5 'Will � serve as our response to The lette ��8 from Davi Emilita and addressed to you in r w �orm environ- mental assessment dated January 13 , ,�C.sv'�.*�z�ck,t�,4,t�"w We submit , herewith , the follo ing items as requested: y 1 . Revised survey made by oung & Young dated Auqust 2 , �88 1� This survey contains 1 the inEormation requested by Mr .�-`�; Emilita. � � 2 .Copies of the bu' idng permit for lot #2. aad-a-�ee}9y-�f �,�1,.,Ka,s . Also a copy oE 7D• _„ � a letter �of o jurisdiction issued by the N.Y. S .-D.E.C. ��'`0 OM� �A� rp 3 . Copy letter dated May 29 , 1987 from the SCDHS confir- "� �'� mi their approval of soil borings for both lots. l & 2 . �4 . opy oE letter from The Land Use Company describing vege- tation on the site . 5 . Please be advised that we have had the pond perimiter flagged , as best as possible , as requested. I hope that this provides you with the information necessary -t� t on our long form assessment , the review of which has been extra- rdinarily protracte3. f/�./f��/�'"' � Oa��ruC-J�2 .�s� _ , 1 .M�"�/"'""- .f�/ Oavid E. Kapell as aqent � . • s . KAPELL REAL ESTATE, INC. 400 Front Street Post Office Box 463 _.. ___. Greenport, New York 11944 �-� r� 516-477-0100 � � � � ..---- t �{ � i1 BRANCH OFFICES ��pp u 21 Noith Feny Road,Box 1009 � ' 9 pRr Shelter Island,Now York 11964 . (516) 749-0100 10 Fla�ders Road,Box 1771 N Riverhaad,New Yort 11901 PLANNING BOAR� (516) 369-0100 � August 18 , 1988 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re : Hanauer & Bagley Set-off Dear Mr . Chairman : In connection with the above referenced project this will serve as our response to The letter dated May l6 , 1988 from David Emilita and addressed to you in review of our lonq form environ- mentgl assessment dated January 13 , 1988 . We submit , herewith , the following items as requested: 1 . Revised survey made by Young & Young dated August 2 , 1988 . This survey contains all the information requested by Mr . Emilita. 2 .Copies of the builidng permit for lot #2. �'�f , . Also a copy of a letter o£ no jurisdiction issued by the N.Y.S .-D.E.C. 3 . Copy of letter dated May 29 , 1987 from the SCDHS confir- ming their approval of soil borings for both lots 1 & 2 . 4 .Copy of letter from The Land Use Company describing vege- tation on the site . 5 . Please be advised that we have had the pond perimiter flagged , as best as possible , as requested. I hope that this provides you with the information necessary to act on our long form assessment , the review of which has been extra- ordinarily protracted. cy�.a�uWQ �e� avid E. Kapell as agent .,.»' _ _ . , � � E�ONMENTAL CONSULTANTS & PLANNERS �ry� � v� 1g88�/ �� May 16, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board 53995 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hanauer and Bagley Dear Mr. Orlowski, Per your request of 21 April, I field inspected the site on 4 May. The written documentation i received from your office consists of a LEAF Part I dated January 13, 1988 and survey dated February 26, 1985. , In order to complete a Part II ceview the following information needs to be completed: 1. Verified delineation of freshwater wetlands (using a numbered flagging system) . , 2. Copies of all permits on "Lot 2" . 3. Field flagging of all lot corners, existing and proposed. 4. Up-to-date survey showing verified wetland flagging, location of the existing foundation, building envelopes, pcoposed well, sanitary system and driveways and edge of pond by tie liness (rather that sketch) all in addition to and correction of information shown on the February 26, 1985 survey. 5. independent verification of threatened and endangered species. " Upon receipt of this information we will proceed with further ceview. Sincerely, ' . SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES, INC. ``1\i^-t'.�. � ��M�'r' ' David J.S. ilita Principal Planner, AICP DJSE:mt `'� 23 Narragansett ��ve. )amestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 _ __ i ' � � KAPELL REAL ESTATE, INC. 400 Front Street Post Office Box 463 Greenport, New York 11944 516-477-0100 BRANCfl OF�ICES 21 North Ferry Ro�d,Boz 1009 Shelter Islend,New Yo�k 11964 (516) 749-0100 10 Pundera Road,Box 1171 Riverhead,New York 1I901 (Sl6) 369-0100 June 23 , 1988 Mr . Victor Lessard Building Dept . Administtator Southold Town Hall ' Main Road Southold , N.Y. 11971 Ref: Building permit � 16160 dated 7/1/87 Sue Hanauer 6 Joan Bagley Dear Vic : On behalf of my clients , Sue Hanauer & Joan Bagley , I hereby request a six month extension of the above referenced building permit which is due to expire on Ju1y 1 , 1988 . The foundation for the proposed house has been installed and we anticipate framing to begin shortly . Thanks for your assistance in this matter . Reqa ds , ��-�` ,�� n David E. Kapell �, e as agent �� j:` �/�� 6/3o�pa, � _ � ��A 1 r. � �..��y� _ �_ M t'.�"fy��. i� '4 �. ��" ��6��'�(S�(��' �`: �� s�� ' i ��1�� .�� A �{�� x�� 6� ' 1•i vJ�, !7'Aqj�'Yi f fpt xt ' • r / } �, � � `t l� �",y� t� } i �}rv r M: ��KQ �L;�� + �S�} Y f f � �� ,,, , �OFKSOUTHOLD � � r,,. w � �,,�� r�� ,.,} � ILbING'�EPARTMENT, —�! 3� 1 4!1�';' �'AI1�Yf��l� {4 'y�' ��v �1�1raTOWN HALL��,�.��t �1: 4 .Yi �;n , SOUTHOLD N Y '' � ' �'"'` � '�'�+'� ' � = �.: s , '��t k .. 4 .. . �' ��.�'3� F l i �. � �.� j� ) i' . �„f .� '�„ �� , � r "�'� �� i �.�3 '� : �»,Iq � � ,�r.v� { y � ��, r �u, .� j ��.f" 1 S •R��:5 �- ^ ��' f Y 2 ;e} V Y I� . ! r F'." �f''f�j'ai1�" ��a ' °t � �> � ; � � tiR � f Sa v� f y� � � �4�. �k '.'�i !wM ! ,n r �� , ��'*'� �'A��fc�'� � UILDIPIG�'PERAA1T�i`�N, �'R' . � `sf:�,�x, 7.R � �`w�r �l�, !��a Y �ti: � p ,! " � ' `` '' .,, �� ..". r �� , 1ti''�"t'�9',. r .r � � V'�' d° �'�� i �� (THI$ PERMIT MU57 BE�KEPT.ON. � � � � ` � �y �' �a �i 3° � � � � � , THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL ',�, � , J ; , � y r� � r � � ¢ � :+r! 4 h �F 1+ 3 ii p p �� , ,< C�IMPLETIO O E WORK AUTHORIZED) .�"u � � � � ' y�y� � g ' � � F. '.b r r'Vt�'Ftti�`� �� ;54,x� . l;e k��'�'� `1�'i'�P :. 7 �- J � �c � ��, .�vy �9 � r c ,. aY��;�. r >4M . d' .. �v�= 1 � < � f.�� 7 f n u ,, � c �ji z . � k r'$'' NO ;, ,' �,, • . �. t 7` r a�' „a , :, ,�'� �`' 16l ` � ��',' " " �� '�y�:.� '4,�e§ �� y'W '� �!-^ :� �OtB ... : q ,[� F. ��. u� '�. r'. r��(' � ! w?P 2s�y��ft�'4�t' e"�rr "r�.r �� '�'�� °� � �9 �� ' p � a � '4 p„ 'd'�' n:.5. r3 i .'� rFi m� at ,i . �t�e_. ��±�'� ,'i �' i �' �� !.. . . . ,. . . . ' i i„'�t. _� . �' 1:'c s � Perm�ission is hereb t;,. ° Y 9r6nted to ' � r " ' � ��1}�� +,/�� 5�� '.� �'� ' iyy `f fry;}� u ��%.: '^1 .• i � 5 l..MkT ! s;.:y�� 1.� I k� s �"�1 dc �^q �� • �� w ,>,: �g i� iu��}� 7+�� fi ' ��yy.t n'n h�Q/ ' • + ,;�p�`�� f,,y�S��,;�pF�n��' fai* ,�yy� � N 'k� r .1 a.'1�� f�y y]/ � •' II�� F'y�e �'#j �'" "T'si�� '� r� �'�F .fO�M�,. �.. ��µ'�.'.d •. 3�r�� !�l�F� i� � ��+�R1 {��.i � ��°�C �� r;�:. K � �1�1 � � - I� ',•;., � � _ �� '�� •' . T�� -��-��1��v ��- ///�� t � .. N 4.. . F �,��J �� .... }�� Cj+� � � 'r� '� "•••"••'�u.� ... • �• �� Y � 4 .� ^ . � .?r � ... ......./ �{�5., �. � .... .� ...:. �, at prernises located ot 2i u� S„7�y_�� -I r ' � T ..�!:::"'�f3.. . .a �.. � c�S,-•.+-aJ�«rJ ,�n?f �rl(L�'Y(,1(. s .23,; . • ........ .. . . .. � .. . .... ..... � . . ... d,�i�:?.�^' . y ��;� i .:. � � �� . . ,,. . . ...�. °�� ' �� ' " 'r'. :�:s �.,Y..WMi �' yY.�i t �,: c �� ...... r . 4 y �Y,�. County�Tox Mop No 1000 Section ..S�.rti� ... Blxk . . OG?, ' s`�`'�('��( ,'� � W'�" � � ; .,gr �r y^�r,,,, r,,.s Lot No, T... � rM ,' �' ;' � Pursuant to opplication�'rvdoted,� `�+�;h� � �' .... .. �"�... d�oPP by°;�he•! � �;�" ... ;, a r t i ' = YAF . .. .. , 1R cn �,� � ¢ Building Inspector x r. . .w�„ <t . � '� �qj !n .t 1 „ , . '�b ' �� ; �Fee S.. �.�...... ..... � `r°,� :'y, ti � � .. ` w/� � . ... . ..�... ........ � � . 4y.�� ' . '` . �` Build(n � 1 �ir . `r 0 ►tSDector' ' .. . . . �. �.,'...yk5.. � � � "� � ,. . - '�.� " n. - +�y^ Rev. 6/30/80 � • � � o�S�FFO(k�,o `' " y IIENRY P. SMITH, Pcesident ti '� � JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. N � � � - TELEPHONE PHILLIP J. COOBEAUD �- T f516) 765-1892 ALBER'C KRUPSKI, JR. � : ELLEN M. LARSEN � O�yyO,( Ws� `�� BOARD OF 1'OR'N 7'RUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town 1IaIl, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York I 1971 August 6, 1986 Abigail A. Wickham Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, P.C. Main Road, P.r 0.� Box 1424 , Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: Sue Hanauer and Joan Bagley Dear Ms. Wickham: A question has been raised regarding this proposal by the Board of � Appeals. Please be advised that approval. by che Town Trustees has been granted based on the Suevev fnr Sue Nan;,��r h .T�an Baeley at Snutholrl . --.': -.. ��b. ��, �:J� ..uu iev;.seu .,a� ,.,, �„ iyp� yhowing the building envelope placement 50' from the edge of [he pond. �. Please be advised that there is to be no distuibance to the Emergent Aquatic Vegetation in this area and the fol.lowing provisions shall be taken during construction: � 1. During excavation the fill must bo. contained so that it does not wash into the pond. 2. Care should be taken so as to pre�lude the entry of any construction material into Uie pond, 3. Blacktop driveways can not b�. usc,l. 4. Following construction all areas ��f exposed soil shall be properly protec[ed with s��ic:il,le .•rosi_on control devices and/ or vegetated to prevent entrv uf s;oil i.nto the pond. If you have any ques[ions �.�r ��un��.�i.ns , please do not 'hesitate to con[act this office. :,.�r�� rrul.y yours, ,�� ,� � �� ,C , � � NEW YORK S�.l7E DEPARTMF.NT OF FNVIRONMFFffAL .JNSER�7IOV Regutn.tort,/ n�(6a,ine un.i.t B4i!g. 40� SUf�Y--Room 219 S.tony [�cook, NY 11194 (516) 751-7900 � i c{:�ia�+. F f�Ui � k�,oi., �ece�.n� er 2 � 19 �a Main /2� L ��or Louf re►.cG Sfep�etiso P.o. ao� � �z � Ma-t�; �u� k, C • Z, �ll� I/9S2 RE: PrOP-cr�y o � Lawrokce S`f G/o�thSOh vuu Ms. �} bi9 a ; � I/lf�ck �,Q�,., +or Lau� re .,cc s �"cp� cas A n.ev�.uv haa 62¢n made o5 yoev� p2opoeaC .to: I O(e�e�v�o �J roP e r �y Norton P� . Hor�on P�• l own, a -F Seu��o�� 1 / I 1 � l�f�+ Ro�, a►+o� .Sour.a� I�itw /-rvt• TnT�rSCeT�or. D / �,9 ouSt � T. o��"+��t�`°n�P4rce � rs Si�u.�ecl or+ -ft,e torner Ot fl�iS /nfcr$�cf/ov� (aa�a�.,,+ ) and -F �ti� sou�� . Suf�'o/K Co. -�-..�rm.e�P P,s�,-;�t#�odr �°�'� s,o" (c OSO � as S�ow �h -�aJl maP oN Tke Nuv Vo S ¢ ¢pan.xm� o� Env.ih.onmen.t.a.t Co►uenvati.on hcu d�t¢hmi,ned �� t 4 ' .tha.t .the above prtojeat ,i.e: . �P-l.- n r` _ Mon.e .than 100' F.wm�Frteehiva.ten. Iu�tlnncfa ��u �,�-�o; Y 7he Fneeluua,ten. We.LCunds prt¢aen.t art¢ .Lenta.t�.veCy manp¢d a.e Ce,ae ,than 12.4 ��ct �`� ac/�ee and have no.t 6een dea�.gna,ted by tJi¢ Sia.te ae hav�ng unuauat .Cocn,L .impo2tnnce a.t .thi.e .Li.m¢ ea an.¢ not ctvuceru:£y negu4a.ted by 1JYS�EC S"�� _ The we.tLanda pn.¢aen.t an.e T.i.da.l and .i.t appuvee .tha.t you need .to appX.y 6oR /� � � a Ttd�, (V2tCancte Pel�mi,t wl C� rh�.e6on.e,�o pe�mi� unci¢h. An.ticEe 24 f Frteehwtiteie G!e,LCanrle 1 0� .the Fnv.veon- � meh.t.a,L Conaenva.ti.on Lcuu .i,e n.equ.ih.ed, �'�� Vehy�o�•�t�►�^^�rs` � .�0 2 Da►u.eP J. Lwcfu.n ' Reg�.ona.Z. P�mi.t A�.mini.e.tha,toh DJL�RNT:ez , . __ _ . _. . _. . . � S COUNTY OF SUFFOLK q� � � Michael A. LoGrande SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECtJTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES D�vio Mwrtpis,M.D.,M.P.H. COMMISSIONER May 29, 1987 � . David E. Kapell Kapell Real Estates Inc. 10 Flanders Road Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 � RE: Hanauer & Begley (T) Southold Dear Mr. Kapell: � Based upon the information you have submitted, the soil conditions appear to be acceptable for the installation of individual sewage disposal systems on Parcels 1 and 2. In addition, any final maps submitted to the Department should clearly show the high water mark and wetlands of the pond. Since the Zoning Board is no longer involved in the SEQRA process, this Department will be coordinating with the Planning Board in relation to the location of the sewage disposal system to any wetlands. If you have any questions concerning this, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, � �\� � ' Roydl R. Reynolds, P,E. Sr. Public Health Engineer Bureau of Wastewater Management RRR:ljr cc: Southold Planning Board courvrr ceHren 548-3312 RNERHEAO.N.Y. 1 1 g01 _ _ . . . _ . ___ , IU'�� , ' 2�c��- e-•z� (,. � � � �i� i, i 9.�s. s ��E �and 2csE �o►��a�.y N. COUNTRY RD. � BOX 36i WADING RIVER. N.Y. n79: (5i6) 9�9-3515 April 25, 1985 Wickham, Wickham , & Hressler, P. C. Main Road, P. O. Box 1424 Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 Attn: Abigail A. Wickham, Esq , � Re : Hanauer 8nd Bagley Lightt�ouse Rd and Soundview Ave . Southold, N.Y. � Dear Ms . Wickhams As per your request, I have personally inspected the above referenced property and can offe,r the follocring comments relative to the parcel ' s development potential. 1) Upland vegetation found at the subject surrounding the small freahwater pond is predominantly Black Cherry CPrunus serotina) and Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) . Said trees average 6" - 8" diameter breas't� height (dbh) and cover an understory of honeysuckle and greenbriar. The pond shoreline area containa a freshwater Wetland fringe 10 ' to 20 ' in width. Hetlands species obsezved include Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) and SummersWeet (Clethra alnifolia) . 2) The southeast corner of the property appears to have sufficient area to consiruct one single family dwelling. Said dwelling should be sited as to prevent fertilizers , and road/roof rUnoff from entering the wetland system and a natural buffer area should be established between the pond and improved areas . Turf landscaping should be minimized and subsurface recharge utilized for roof dtains and driveuay drainage . Lastly� hay bales should be installed •along the wetland buffer area prior to any construction activities . � � �FFO(,� P Z � TO D v� ' � � SL 1 �, -�,a Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 � May 25, 1988 David Kapell , P.O. Box 463 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Hanauer and Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Kapell: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 23, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept and request compliance with Dave Emilita' s report dated May 16, 1988. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, -!a'f/+t�9�� r . BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN Enc: ]t _ . _ _ � � Ltd. /� ENVIR!NMENTAL CONSULTANTS & PLANNERS �~� 1 � �A J88� � ■' May 16, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board 53895 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hanauer and Bagley Dear Mr. Orlowski, Per your request of 21 April, I field inspected the site on 4 May. The written documentation I received from your office consists of a LEAF Part I dated January 13, 1988 and survey dated February 26, 1985. In order to complete a Part II review the following information needs to be completed: 1. Verified delineation of freshwater wetlands (using a numbered flagging system) . 2. Copies of all permits on "Lot 2". 3. Field flagging of all lot corners, esisting and proposed. 4. Up-to-date survey showing verified wetland flagging, location of the existing foundation, building envelopes, proposed well, sanitary system and driveways and edge of pond by tie lines; (rather that sketch) all in addition to and correction of information shown on the February 26, 1985 survey. 5. Independent verification of threatened and endangered species. Upon receipt of this information we will proceed with further review. �,Of,�c.e�s..r �.�-a-� / Sincerely, �a�o-o-�C�. — yb �c-.r SZEPATOWSRI ASSOCIATES� INC. , , ^ ,`1�\�� 74Lc.a� , � �a ��.P�.c.r—e,c-.-c.. David J.S. ilita /i��i��"'`�' Principal Planner, AICP A"�,a� � !� _.a,.....r DJSE:mt ` �7 � 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 028 _ _ ,. �. ,�_ _ _ � �FFO(,� � P Z � . TO' D SL � � 1 ,�(. � Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 21, 1988 . Dave Emilita Szepatowski Associates,Inc. 23 Narragansett Avenue Jamestown, Rhode Island 02835 RE: Environmental Assesment form of Hanauer and Bagley Dear Dave: Please be advised that i am sending a revised Environmental Assesment form of Sue Hanauer and Joan Bagley for your review. Our office was under the impression that this had been previously sent to you. However, it has been brought to our attention that this may not have been the case. As an appreciable amount of time has passed, we would appreciate your review and comments as soon as possible. Very truly yours, � Q emm� O.�C„�1«;�;. BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR� CHAIRMAN ]t �. ,� . . _ / . } � • • APPEH01% A EAF � ENVIRO�IMENTAL A55'_SSMENT - VART 1 Pro.fect Inforr.ntion � NnTiCf: rtiis dncu�neat �s des�cned 'o assist in determinin9 Nhether the action proposed mey have a signiH cant Nfect on the a�rlronment. vtease conplete the ent5re Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as cart �! !ne avvli:ati�n for aoerr,val and may be subject to further veriH cation and Dublic review. Drovfde any a�Aitiona� �n�ormation you believe will be needed to complete PARTS 2 and 3. it is exveaon r�ut ccmole:icn cf the EAF wi)1 be deDendent on information currently available and will not im�ol'+e new s:udies, research or investinetion. If iMormation roquirina such addltional vork is unawl�ble. so indlcate and sretily eath instance. �IptlE OF PROJECT: , � �"" NAME AMO ADDRESS OF OYNER (If �ifferent) ___ Su� H�u�r and Joan Baalev lHame) ' 130 Woodl�u-y Road ADDNESS ANO NNtE OF APPLILANT: treet Wood6ury� New York 11797 En—Consultants, Inc. �'} t�te p �we 1329 North Sea Road au9tHEss PtqNE: 516�692-4904 treet Sout�ian�ton, New York 11968 Applicant proposes to divide a F tace v of land with an area of 5.556 ac into iwo residential building lc OESCRIDTI09 OF PROJECL• (Briefly descrlbe type of oro,�ect or action) �c3 sanitary systPm on each. � r a s o ui on o ave n receiv an a oun a on is in. � (PLE�SE COHVLETE EACH qUESTInN - Indtute N.A. tf not appitceble) � � A. SIiE DESCRIPTION . '"g- (Physfcet settfng of overell pro�ect, both develoned and undereloped areas) 1. General char�cter of the land: Generally unifonn slope X &narally uneven end rvlling or irn�lar 2. Prcsmt land use: Urban , ]ndust�aCant'reSlclentiaY�� Suburtan _ , Rurel , Forost � _. Agrlculture ,,�ther _ � ' -- 3. iotal ecreage of eroject arca: 4_95cres.or 215�404 s.f. Aoproximate acreaqe: Presentiv After Completion Vttsently Atter ConqleNon hkadaa or Brushtand acres __acres Hater Surface Area 109_,006crsaf. 109,10(3� s Fo�ested 203�404»s�,182i4Q4es.f, Unvegetated (rock, earth or fillj _atres _�cres 4aricuttural acres acres ' — —' Roads, buildinns �ieUand (Freshwater or �nd other paved � 7tdat rs ner Arttcles surtnces �_acres4�0005a s ?a, '� a� r.c.l.l *11�OQ[2r�.f,1�QL?es.£. — — *Approxitndtion Other (indicate tyne) 0 acres6�0005a€rrs r__�$capinq a. vnat is �redominant sotl typeGs) on nroject site? Montauk 1ne SaFid lo�m, 3-8$ slopes (MEII) --- �---- -- -- -Y------ 5. �. Srp u�ero b�erock outcro�oi�os on �rniPct �:ite? ___ Yes X_ Mo RiVCThead S�ndy lOanl 3-8$ (R�. � • �a: ic dr.D[h to bedmck? 20�+� I+n feet) 9/l/;8 "_..._.._' ."__ . , , � � . 6. Apnroxina.e oer,-pn:a�e �° ;:ropos^C nrojet[ ti[� ui!q slooes' 0-10; 1��".; ;n_15.': _X; 75: or grcater _t,. 7. ls oroject cor�tiqur,�u to, or contain a buildinn nr site listed on the National Reqister of Historic - PLces? res X Ho � 9. tmsc ;s cne eeoth to tne �a!er table? 27+ ieet based upon Y&Y test hole. I�PF'-`�r t/�u.��i�;, ..1' �ro-..d w..Fcn. _ +S� � 9. Do huntinq or /ishing oD�ortunitie Dresentty exist in thre FraJed area? X Yes _No 10. Does project site contain any sDeties of Dlant or animal life Chat is identSH ed u threatened qr endanqered - __Yes _ _70, according te - Identify each sDecies NOn2 dppdZ'P.��].inE O£ fi21d inS�ectiOn (12/18/87) _ 11. Are there any u0loue or unusual land forms o [5e.Frojett site7 (i.e. c`ifts, dunes, other geological ' forwations - X Yes Na. (Describe �OriCi 12. is the pryiec[ site presen[ly used by Che cor�emnity or neighborhood as an open sDace or rccreation �rca - �Yes , _Ib. 13. Cbes the present zite offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be iryartant to the com�unity? X Yes No 14. Streaws witM n or contiguous to Drojett area: a. Na�e of streae anA na�e of river to which it fs tributary 15. Ukes, ionds, MetLnd areas within or contiguous to Oro�ect area: ,, �� Unn� pond ; b. Site (�n acres) �•5 acres 16. Mhat is th. dwtn�{�nt lat,ned useza�nda�zon�tng classtfic�tlon� within ap 1/4 mile r�dtus ot the Dro�ect (e.g. single �1RC�lesTc'lI[I11Y�T2S1C1PSltld�"anc��agriCUl�tI1C31. 2 itory). B. iROJECT DESLRIPiION 1. Physical dieensions and sule of projact (fill in dlmensions as apOropriate) a. ToGI contiquous urcaqe ownad by pro�ect sponsor 4.9+ ��res. b. vroJect �tre�9e developed: •25d'atres t�itt+tly; •25+ acres ultimately. c. Pro)ect acre�ye to rew�ln undevelooed 4_65+A d. Length o( Dro,Ject, in niles: N�A (it aopropriate) e. If D� ct is an e■vansion of eatsttng, indicate Oercent of ezpansion Droposed: bullding sQuare toot- age 1� ; developed acreage f. Mun�ber of off-strset parkin9 spaces eaistinq � ; proposed _ 6.��a,- g. Maxf�nun vehicular trioz generated oer hour 1.$ (upon canpletton of proJect) h. If rezidenti�l : Number and tyDe of housinq units: � �ne Family Tvro Family MultfDle family Condominium lnitial z .� Ultimate 2 �n� i. If: qrientation - ''ei9hborhood-City-Regional Estimated Emoloymen[ Commertial N�� Industrial �'� � j. To[al heiqht of tallesL'�'onosed struc[ure _ _ 35 feet. � . . . � � � 2. Now much na!ural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed fran the site - � tons __cuDic yards. 3. How many acres of veQeta:ion (trees, shruhs, ground tove.rsj will 6e remove0 fror site �5+ a[res. • d. Nill any maturo fere;tX:over 190 years old) or other locally-importan[ veqetation be removed hy this pro.je[t' ''rs N� � 5. Are thrre any plans for re-vagetation to replace. that removed during cons[ruction? X Yes _t10 6. If sinale ohese �r�irct: Antici0ated neriod of construction l�months, (including demolition). � 7. (f mut;i-nFased oroject� a. Total number of phases anticiDated N�A No. b. Anticioated date of com�encement Dhase 1 month �ear (including demolition) c. AODroximate comoletion date final phase month �ear. � d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseauent oAase:? _Yes _No 8. Nill blasting occur during construction? Yes X No 9. Nunber of ,jobs generated: during construction 12 ; after pro.lect is complete �. 10. Number of ,jobs eliminated by this DroJect � 11. Mill project require relocation of any pro�ects or facilities7 Yes X No. If yes, exDlain: 12. a. I5 surface or subsurface liqutd waste disposal involved? X Yes Ya. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, lndustrfal, etc.) sewage c. ]f surface disvosal name of stream into which effluent wtll be discharged 13. Wili surface area of ezisting lakes.xponds, streams, bays or other Surface watenrays be increased or decreased by Or000sal? _Yes _No. 70. Is proJect or any Dortion of Droject located in the 100 yeer flood 01ain? _Yes X No 15. a. Does project involve disposal o� solid waste? X Yes _No b. If yes, will an existing so11d waste disnosal facility be used? X Yes _ No� c. ir yes, q�ve name�Southold Carting _; �ocation Southold Taan Iandfill, Mattituck d. lNll any wastes not go into a seaage disnosal system or into a sanitary landitll? Yet X No � 16. Niil pmJect use herbiclAes or pr.sticides? Yes X No � 17, Will Droject rouN nely Drodute odors (more than one hour oer day)? ��-i:.Yes X NO 18. Will projec[ produce oFerating noise exceeding the local ambience noise level5? _Yet X No 19. 4111 Droject result in an intrease in energy use? X Yes _No. If yes, indictte type(s) Electricity and fuel oil . 20. If water supply is from wells fndica[e numning capacity z gals/minute. Zl. � Total anticina[ed water usage pnc�day _ 300 Qals/Aaylhous2 22. Zoning: a. Ilhat is Aonlnant zoning class�ficati�n ot si[e? A A rie/Resident - _—�—__' b, Curren[ soecific zoninq class�fication of site S�nt-' c. Is nronoSeA use co�sisten! �.�rh rresent zoninq? Y2S `� _—__ d. lf no, indy�icate desired zoninq _____ _________ ___._._. ______ •` .i_ ... . , : . � + 26. Apvrovals: a. Is any Federal permit required? Yes X No b. Does Droject lnvolve State or Federal funding or financfngl __Yes _X No c. Local and Regional approvals: � Approval ReQuired Submittal Approval (Yes, No) (Type) (Date) (Date) Ltty, Town, Viltage Board � Ltty, Town, Ytllage Ptanning Board �— �tafr'— ��-- ---- City, Town, loning Board — ----— City, County Health �epertment —� S�II71'T.�'Q'�'�StHn�id"Ae11 � Other local agencies — Other regional agenttes -- State Aqencies � �--27�— �Z Federal Agencies L. INFORINTIONQ DETAILS � � � Att�ch �ny addittonal informetlon as e needed to tlarify your pro7ect. If there are or nay be any adverse lmpacts assoclated with the p tal, p easB discuss such impacts and the measures whfch can be t�ken to ntti9ate or avoid them, i" ��j iREPAAER'S SIGIUTURE: 1 '� TIrLE: Y a] � s En-ConS t5 II1C REPRESEHTIMG: Su2 HandueZ' and JOdn Bagley DATE: Januasy 13, 1988 � .w� A� �� . _n_ \ • _< t � i S1Dl :Y B. BOWNB 8� SON $Itlney B.80WnB,P.E.,L.S. (�_�,��j��.�� RolenO AnAerb (79pp-79$Q) """"'��" � Frank Cepobianco aey. P.E.,L.S. ReBa L Cocchi ChBe�e!C KBI 45 Manor Road Frencis J L Alexandre W.Mercil,P.E. � 1T�� Roberl A.$tenton, P.E. SRIItFItOW1I� N.Y. 11787 Philip Schlo�xhaue� RobBri W. Brown,L.S. rji B 7Z4'OB�� Joaeph F.Stegmen Zabtliel A.Blackmen, P.E., L.S. � � Paul F.Stavana — Willlem T.Styne George A.Sryle, P.E. Richem B.Weber Jerry D.Almont, P.E. Georga L. Fagan,Jr., Ph.D., P.E. � Thomes R. Pynchon,L.S. � March 29, 1988 Mr. Bennet Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Hanauer & Bagley Subdivision, Southold, N. Y. (SBB N0. 87136) S. C. T.M. Designation: 1000 - 50 - 6 - 4 Dear Sir: We have reviewed the latest submission of Part I Environmental Assessment for the above noted project The following are cortments on it�ns that must be corrected or revised prior to Part II evaluation. It is to be noted that the bulk of the comments or required corrections are repeats of those presented in the October 27, 1987 repor� We alsa requested earlier that a site plan showing proposed structures and appurtenant features be submitted. The plan that we have been provided with is dated February 26, 1985 and does not show any proposed development If there are any facets of this report that you wish to have clarified, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, SIDNEY B?�BOWNE & SON CONSULTING GINEERS / EDWARD . HA ANN EJJ:cIg 0 � oAP�R I � � �� MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An EWN OpporlunNy Empbyar M/FM , , , • Mar,ch�, 1988 HANAUER & BA6LEY SUBDIVISION, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK S. C. T.M. DESIGNATION: 1000 - 50 - 6 - 4 EAF - PART I - REVIEW � A. 3. Correct forested area - that will not remain the same after development If a foundation has been installed as noted in letter of January 22, 1988 by Roz Haje that the structure should be shoan on the map submitted and taken into consider- ation when fi119ng out the EAF. Indicate are of wetlands. Enter area of all unvegetated surfaces, i. e. area denuded due to construction, paths and any other travelled ways. s Area of roads, buildings and all paved surfaces must be + entered. d Note: Take into consideration the effect of development in " t��after completion column". e 4. Refer to the Suffolk County Soils Survey Book for proper soils Y description. a. 5b. Enter depth to bedrock. 8. Enter depth to water table as shown on "Suffolk County Water B Table Map" (March 1987). a 10. This phase of study to be conducted by a qualified profes- "' sional person. � e 11. The geological formation which creates the pond basin should be described and the question answered in the affirmativa & B. lb. The site is presently undeveloped and the ultimate developed acreage is to be based on a site plan showing the proposed 5 features of development, i. e , house driveways, walks, and any o other appurtenant features. This data is to be used in answering the question. � c. Enter the correct figure. f. Enter the number of off-street parking space This would include any space that the haneowner would use to park his/her c ar. g. Enter the maximum vehicular trips generated per hour by the completed deve�en� SBB N0. 87136 Disc/SH-1 1. . t ' ' � Marc , 1988 h. No one-family units exist at present, however, ultimately two will exis� j. Enter the height of the tallest proposed structure. 6. 3. This project requires cleari�g of ground cover and possibly trees and brush. This combined area rtwst be entered here. 5. It is common procedure to landscape disturbed areas when building is completed Therefore, this should be answered in the affirmative unless there is no intention to landscape, i. e , 1 awns, shrubs, etc. 6. Indicate length of time anticipated for completion of project 5 9. Complete this question appropriately. d 15a. b. c Fil l out properly. " a 20 & 21. Complete these questions with correct figures. y The commentary on the original EAF submitted to the Town of Southold, a. see report dated 10/27/87 is for the most part a repeat of the cort�nents presented in this repor L B 0 w n e G S 0 n SBB N0. 87136 Disc/SH-1 2. � � �FFOLK P � � T D 5L � � � � 1 ,�. � Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1935 April 19 , 1988 Mr. David Kapell P.O. Box 463 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Hanauer and Bagley Dear Mr. Kapell : Enclosed is a copy of the engineer' s report for the above mentioned subdivision. The Planning Board hereby requests compliance with this report. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, �trnnc�� 91tQ.ou�.�.lu, (�. BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR.P� CHAIRMAN jd �t _ __ �, _ � P �FFOL,Y�, D Az .: � TO� ' D ' SL, �p� ' � y �+1 � �� ` Southold, N.Y. 11971 � (516) 765-1938 . . . rnat'c,� �I � �a � Robert Brown Sidney and Bowne and Son Hauppague, NY 11787 Dear Nr. Brown: Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following: Application of (N�ajor subdivision,�minor subdivisionl site plan) a,nau 2 .a �na 1ev Iiamlet � � � MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File ll �g 'vn , R7 � 36 Suffolk County Tax �iap No.. IOO� � 5� — �j — L� Sketcl: plan Preliminary map Street Profiles Grading Plan Preliminary site plan Final Map Other Comments: E i Very truly ours, /��a�?�� p2� , BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,CHAIRMAN�S• , SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD � i S�FFD(,� P � � T D � � S Y 1 ,Y. � Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 November 9, 1987 Mr. David Kapell - P.O. Box 463 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Hanauer and Bagley Dear Mr. Kape1L• Enclosed is a copy of the engineer's review of the LEAF, for the above mentioned subdivision. Would you please comply with this report and resubmit a corrected form. Upon receipt of same, we will continue the review of this proposaL If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, .B�rnr��k �Z�k� (� BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN� SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD ' ' � October � 1987 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD EAF REVIEW, PART I HANAUER & BAGLEY SUBDIVISION, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK A.3 Forested acreage will not remain the same after b�u Tdi g. Wetlands item not completed. Roads buildin s and other aved surfaces - if project s to e u t on t e a er canp etion column must be filled in, s 4. Refer to the Suffolk County Soils Survey book for proper � soils description, d � 5.b Enter depth to bed rock. e 8. Enter depth to water table as sho►+n on Suffolk County r Water Table Map (Mar. 1987) . Also show actual depth to existing water level based on actual test hole. e 10. This phase of study to be conducted by a qualified professional with back up data. This is atso a D.E.C. B requirement. 0 11. The pond is the result of a geological formation - the w answer here should be "yes". � 13. This answer should be "yes" � B.l.b. Presently the site is undeveloped and the ultimately � developed acreage is to be based on a site plan showing the intent. No such plan has been submitted. s c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped. The pond (2.5 acres) will not be developed nor will be some peripheral ° areas to the pond. Compile data and enter. � f. Off-street parking would include driveway parking by hane owners. g. Enter maxi�aum vehicular trips generated per hour by two residences. See Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers - (1983) . h. Under "one family" initial indicate "zero" as none exist at present. j. Indicate the height of the tallest proposed building. SBB N0. 87136 D/85 - 1 - � ' ' � October 30, �7 6,3 In order to construct 2 homes and appurtenances which is the stated intent, the area to be cleared must be entered here. 5. If, as is normal procedure, landscaping is to follow construction this should be answered uyes". 6. Indicate length of time it is anticipated to canplete construction. 9. Indicate number of jobs 9enerated to construct 2 homes (i .e. excavator, concrete crew. carpenters, sheet rockers, roofers, electrician, plumbers, etc.) S 15.a. Project does involve solid waste (household refuse) . d b. Enter "yes" " a c. Enter name of private carting firm and location of dump site. Y 20. Complete this question with pumpiny capacity. B. 21. Estimated water demand for two residences must be entered. B 26. The project involves a body of fresh water, therefore, ' the N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation requires `" ayency approval . � e G 5 0 n SBB N0. 87136 D/85 - 2 - � �..a,...,.F. :,�,,,�.... , _ . . .. : ,. � � � ;S ' • ;,.,� ,:. . . �EC�IVED BY ':` f - �� i TOIVN OF SOUTfIOLD S�UF1'U��OARD .f . r . r H �� EAF . DATE � . ENYIRO;IMENTAL ASSESSMENT -�PART I � Proiect inform;tion � NOTICE: TAis aocunen: ++ des�cned to asstst 1n determintng whether the attion prvposed may have a siqnifi eftect on t�e envl�c•,mrnt. Pieaze conplete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions wi11 be cor. as oart of tne apoli:ation for aOD�cva1 and may Ce zubject to turther verification and Dublic review. Pro any additinna� �n�ormacion you Eelieve wtll 6e needed to comoletr. PARTS 2 and 3. - . it is erDeccea cnat tar.oletir,n of the EAF wi11 be deoendent on information currently avatlable and will noc • involve new stuaies, reseerce cr inrestiqation. !f lnformation requirina Such additional rork iz unavai�Cle so lndica[e and soecify eac� instance. • � ;IANE OF 7ROJELT: � � �-� MAME AND AODRE55 OF OMHER (if fliff>rent� � Hanauer & Bagley �Set-off ` Sue Hanauer & Joan 8aq_ley� ,..�(Namel_ — —_� _--�--' . . ^ AJOaESS AHO NA1tE 0: Ao7UCANT: , Sve<t; � � David E. Kapell , as agent Woodbury , N.Y. 11797 __ _ _ . jP.?'.�—�5[ace Zipj ame . . � BUSSN:SSPHOHE: 477_9�QQ_.,__ ___.. —_-__-__ 400 Front Street Box 463 - — [RCC Greenport , N.Y. 11944 � . ca�e � ip . . DESCRIDTiCY OF DCO,IECT� (Briefly des[1'1be type of pro�ect or action) Annl i nant � nrnnnaaa __ . tn AiviAp a ��rncl nf lanA �oi +h - ^rea n� S _ �i5(� arroc intn __ tivo residential hn; ld; nq lota .__ (PLEASE COHPLETE EACH qUE57f00 - Indlcate N.A. if not aDDlicable) .1 � . � � . . ' . _ . , A. SITE DESCRIPTION , � . � ' . � (Physical setting of overail project, both develoned and undevetooed areas) - ' 1. General cnaracter of the land: Generally uniform slope X Ganerally uneven and rollina or irre� 2. Prcsenc land use: Urnan , Industrial , Commercial _, SuCurDan _ , Rural , Fo� __, Agriculture �_, 9th:r VaCan� � —" ---- � --- -.. _ � . J. iotal acreage of oroject area$ 5 5�cres. �� Aouro%Imate acreage: �-Presen[ly After Completlon Presently After to�� Neadov or Brushland _acres acres Ila[er Surface Aree � �Zacres 2 ,� foresced _�acres �_a[re Unveqetaced (rock, eartn or fi11) acres aa�icu � _ acres _acres --- — - RO ds, builCinns b(la�d (ire;��a[er o . anG otner paveC T�aal ns ner Art+cles surf.�ces _atres °a, ": nr �.C.l.! __aCres _a[res — . — - O[�er (indiC�te ty�e) acrei <. '+ra: �: ^-eao��r�c saii [yor(s1 an orm,ect si[e. Loam Sand & _ .s.--'•-----=-•=— --'_-- - _ � 5. : '�re :�er� YErutR outtro�oinas o� v ' Y�s X 9p t . �^a: 'S C[]!T IG �eOrGCk? __(�n •PeT) � -' 9:1::6 . � �•,'..� - � . __ _ _ - _ . , • � � SIDNEY B. BOWNE 8� SON SiEney 8.8owne,P.E..L.S. C�__,,,/�;,,,.�j,°�y�y, fiolen0 nnaers ROge�L.Cocchi (1922t959) V•��Y�•—� Frencia J.LYnc� Cheater C Kelaey. P.E.,L.S. 4S M811Of ROBd Phili05chlmzhauer AlezenAre W.Mxcil.P.E. Sm{thtOWl1� N.Y. 11787 JoseO�F.Stegman Robert A.Stenton,P.E. Peul F.Stevena RODert W. Brown.L.S. �rji 6� 724'OB�� wmam T.s�Y�e Zabtliel A.Blackman,P.E., L.S. RicharC e.weeer Oeorpe A.Sryle.P.E R'��-��°��BOIUID Jerry D.Almont,R.E. �� George L Fegan,Jr.,Ph.D.,P.F�'�y+�{y�(�4�� Frank Capobianco,QE. 'V V V �}, — ___� October 30, 1987 Thomes R.Pynchon,l.S.�---- ,,., : � Mr. Bennet Orlowski , Jr., Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Diane Schultze, Secretary, Planning Board Re: Hanauer & Bagley Subdivision, Southold, New York (SBB N0. 87136) Dear Sir: We have reviewed the Environmental Assessment Form for the above noted project. There are a number of omissions and incorrect answers. Upon resubmission of the corrected form we will submit the Part II portion of the EAF (Project Impacts and their Magnitude) . It is to be noted that a body of fresh water lies within the project site. The Department of Environmental Conservation holds jurisdiction over the pond and a 76' buffer strip. They will also require a Cultural Resource Inventory conducted by a professional archaeologist as is mandated by SEQRA. The applicant has failed to date to comply with items requested in letters dated May 29, 1987 by the Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services and August 3, 1987 by this office. If there are any items that the Planning Board feels should be discussed, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CON ULTIN I IEERS s �r��_. � N Encl . EJJ:cIg xc: Ray Jacobs, Supt./Hwys. Ray Dean (SBB) D/85 MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER � An Eqwl OppMunHy Employu M/FM . _. . . . . .__._ . , ., . � � � • :S.' ; : : . ,�� • � � 6. A�pro:inate oercentaae of proDosed orojett site wSth ttooes• 0-193100 .".: 1^-15' Y; I5; or greater _S. ' — — 7. Is DroJect contiguous to, or contain a buildinq or site ltsted on [he National Register of His[oric Places? _Tes �(_No 8, what ts the deocn to tne water ta61e _fe greater than 27 feet g, Do huntfng or fishing opportunities presently ezist in the project area? _Yes X No • 10. Does project ecies of plant or animal tife tha[ iz identified as threatened or endanaere _Yez �_.__�.lo, ccord;ng to - Identif,y each species s. . . I1. Are there a r unu:ual land forms on the project site? �(1.e. c7iffs, dunes,—other geological fomations Ye 3F Pio. (Uescribe ) 12. 15 the Dro,jec te Dresently used by the community or neiqhborhood as an open sDace or recreation area - �.Yes No. 17. — resent site offer or include scen7c views or vistas known to be fmportant to the community? Yes No 16. amz within or tontiguous to projett area: N.A. � -� a. Name of stream and name�of river to which it is tributary 15. Lakez, Donds, Netland areas within or contiguous to Droject area: , a. Rane __ Nn nama : b. Size (in acres) 2 _5 a�res 16. Nhat is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of tAe proJect (e.g. stngleiamily residen[ial, R-2) and the scale of develovment (e.g. 2 story)$iRg12 f3mily - residenti3l- & agricultural . 6. PROJECT OESCRIPTI04 - � 1. Pnysical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as avoropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor acres. C. Vroject acreage develoDe V es initial y res ultimatety. c. Pro,ject acreage to remain undeveloDe� . � . d. _ Lengtl� of pro.)ect, in miles: ni�T^(if aDPropriate) � e. If project is an exDansion of existing, indicate Dercent of.expansion praposed: building square foot- age N. A . ; develooed acreage /. Ilurtber of off-str[r.[ oarking spaces existina , propos `�Y . g. Na:imum vehicutar triqs generated per h �� (u n canpletion of project) � h. (f residen[iai: Number and type of housin, � • i � � :ne Family Two Family � Multiple �amily Condominium � Initial � . .. . Ultimate 2 � 1. I(; firientation � . � �"e+gnCornooa-Ci[y-Regional Ettimated Emoloymen[ Cormercial � Indus'rial � . j. Total he�g�c ef tallese nronozea structu ��. f ec. - . . � * � � .,,. . ., ��.' . . Z, Ho� much naturnl material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) wilt be removed fran Che zSte - � tons v � - tubic ya ). Nor rany acres of �eqetation (treez, shrubs, ground covers) will De reRnved fror� sit -�'��•ak�°s• ►� 1, 11f11 any mat�re forest (over 100 years old) or otner locally-important veaetatSon be removed �y this proJeCt' _Yet _�No . � �.�� 5. Are tnrrc any plans for re-vagetatian to reolace that removed during construction 'd '�'� 6. If single onase Dro]ett: AnticiDated Deriod of construc io �hs, (including emolition). 7. `�ft multt-nhased oroject: a. Total number of phases ant�c No. • b. llnti;ioated date of connencement Dhase : month _;ear (inctuain N.A. demolition) - � . . C. ApDroximate conoletion date final Dhase month. _�tar, � � � d. Is Dhase 1 financially deDendent on su6:eavent ohases? Yes _ 8. HS1,1 blasting occur during [onstrutttont . No �� ' � - � � 9. Hunber of jobs generated: during canstruc on�lE"'R�a er project ts co lete _ . t0. NuRDer of jobs eliminated by this project N_� . . . - � 11, Will Droject require relocntion of any projects or facilities? _Yes X No. If yes, exclain: 12. a. Is surtace or subsurface liquid waste disDosal involved? X Yes you: . b. ]f yes, indicate type of Naste (sewage, industrial, etc.) SeWaqE _— .. C. If surface dis0osal name of stream into which effluent will De discharged N.A _ 1S. Ni11 surface area of existing lake{, vonds, streams, bayz or other surface waten.ays he increased or detreased Dy.pr000sal? _Yes �t Na. ld. Is Oroject or any Dortion of projett located in the 700 year flocd vlain? Yes �_��No � �S I5. a. Does vroject involve disvosal of solid wast Yes i • — — b. If es, wi11 an existing solid waste disnosal ' ' be used? Yes '� Y � c. !f yes, give name: ocatio�_ _ _. - . � d. :Ifil any wastes not go into a 5erage discosal,system or Snto a sam�tary 1anCfil�YeS X_ 16. Yflt prnject use herbicides or vr.sticides? Yes �_No ' � 7), Nill project routinely Droduce odors (more than one hour oer day)? � Ye5 X NO 18. Nill project produce overating noise exceeding the local ampience noise levels? Yes X No 19, 4i11 projec[ result in an increase in energy use? X Yes _40. If yes, indicate type!5) tricit fuel for two homes . __ ___ � ' 20. 1!. water suooly is from wells indica[e oumoin caoacity �gals/minute.2 residential wells � 21. To[al anticinated uater usage �er day __ ls/day. Se2 above . . 22. Zaning: a. Ilhaf i5 doninan[ zoning t1a55��ta[�On Of Si[e? A Aqricultuarl/Resident ' - b. Curr�n[ Soe[iliG Zoning C1aS5ificallon of Site $3rt12 _____ _ . .. !s OrppOSPA uze co^s+s:en- ..it� nresent :on�nr,? Yes __ _ � d. If no, indicate desired .'cr�nn � .�: . _ __ _ EiVED BY ... � . � C • � 8(IUTN��WN FLANNING BORRD .� . � �. ' HUG 24 i987 . EAF UnTE ENViRONMENTAL ASSESSHENT. - PART II �y ��/ ��t� � ro�ec 5 and ir H anit,_ _ude _� ".� � v �� .�,i �- i Ts�v .- Gen=ral 1n!a�3:i•7'n :c�+d Csre.'u11y) �� . In comple:i�g t.^•a fnm �oshould be gutded by the question: Fave my decisions and dete., �een reascr.zole? The�� i t expected to be an exoert environmental analyst. - - -- � � - fden[ifying tha[ zr. effect will be Dotentially large (column 2) does not mean thaS it is also nete- siani`?ca:,t. ar;y 7args e!fect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Ry idencvfy eTreci in celu,nn 2 simply asks that it be loaked at furtner.. � _ ' - The Examotes vrovided are to assist the revieNer by showing types of effects and wherever oossi�!e ' af magnicuoe that would trigger a response in column 2. The ezamples are generally a0olicaSle thn State and for r..ost situations. But, for any sDeciflt Dro,�ect or site other examDles and/or lower � may he more ao�ro�riate for a Potential Large Impact reting. . � - Each Dro.lect, an each site, in each. localTty, will vary. Therefore, the exanptes have been offere� They do not constltute an exhaustive list of impacts and threshoids to answer each queztion. - The nu�er ot exampies per question doe5 nat indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) � . a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will De anv effect. b. Ma�6e answers should be considered as Yes answers. t. If answering Yes to a ovestion then check the aDProoriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the o --size of the imoact. If impact threshold e0uals or exceeds any exampie Drovided, check column-2 SmOact will occur bvt threshold is lower than examDle, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact then consider tne imoact as notentially larg OroceeC to PART 3. � � e. If a oo[entially laroe imoact or effect can be reduced by a change in [he Project to a less tha magni[uae, place a Yes in co'.�r.,n 3. A Ilo resoonse indicates� tha[ such a reduction is not ootzi 1. 2. SHAII TO POTENTIAL CAN 1 � MODERATE LARGE REOG � � IHPACT INPACT PROJE IM7ACT OH LANO ' . NO YCS 1. G1LL THERE 9E Arl EFFEr.? p5 A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHAtIf,E TO "'eO . PRJJE�T SiTE? � Exacoles [hat Houla .4eo1� to Cotunn 2 A�y co^scru.tio^. on <_lopes of 15; or grca[er, (15 foot rise ner � -� ' IOO �fon: of lenat^.;, .^r,where the aeneral slooes in the project -- -- . - � area excced 10:... � - • Ccr.struction on Land where the denth Co [he wa[er tahle is less tnan J feet. � �� - — �ons[ruttion c( naved' narkina area. fnr 1,^'^ or mnre ve�icle5. " - _ Cnn<.crut:inn on 1�n9 where bedrock is e.nosed or qenerally � . .�tnin J /eet cf exis[�ng ground sur/ace. � -- — _ Ccnt:�rat!�o� trd• wi11 cont�nue for morr. than 1 �ear or tnvolve cA-P !haR Lrn �•.d:C Pr ;[dOE. -� .- � (�t±vt!tpn �y- -�r�ny 9ur70525 [hdC 'a0u�d �^rovP r.OrP C�dO I ,��JQ . � � :ccs c/ r.a;oral n_,enal (i.e. rock or soil) per vedr, — — - CC�s[r.�t+on o` dnv new Sdnita�y lanC('Il. , •5- � . . • • ' f � \ • � � . . . . . 1. 3. ' e•au rn �OTE9TIAL CFN I'1PACT BE � . � � OERATE L�RGE HEDUCED BY , � � ".oefT IMPef.T Do�IECT CNANf� _ Consiruction lA a deSlqoated flooEuay. _ Otner imoacts: . , ' . . —� — � — r . _� ' � ' +. :`� 2. VILI TY.ERE BE AY EFfECT TO ANY UNIl�U$ 0R UNtlSUM LPNO FORM$ �, Y�5 — -- �� FOUND ON TME SRE? (i.e, c11ff;, dunes, owlogical fornu- OO tfons, ett.) _ Snecitic lan6 forms: � II�VaCT ON BATER � • � ." . - .�� . . . , Nfl YES � � 7. VlLL VROJECT AFFECT ANY NATEP. BODY OESIGHATE� AS .. ...Q PROTEC7ED? (UnCer Articles 15, 26, 25 of tAe Env1r- onRental Canservation Law, E.C.L.J � � Exanoles tnat Noule AOD1Y to Colunn 2 � . _ Dredgtna more tAan 109 tuDic yards of materfal frpn � cAannel of a pro[e[ted Stredm. — — �— _ Construction in a designated freshwater or tfdal wetland. _ Other im0acts: d. YI(l 7R�JECT AFFECT ANY N04-VROTECTEO EXISTINf, pR HFH NO YES BOOY OF 41ATER? ............................................0 O E:a-oies that Would Apoly to Column 2 . _ A IOS Sncrease or decreeze 1n the surface area of any body Of water or more tnan a 10 acre tncrease or decrease. —� _ [onstroctfon of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of . � SurfdG! dfea. . � . � � � Ot�er imnaCts• _________'___"_ � _ _ —F1a YfS —� — — 5. 41L1 VROJELT AFFECT SURFACE OR ,R71140vATEB OUALITY? O Eaarolnz that 5!ould Ap�ly to Column 2 . x � _ 7ro�ect �i11 reauire a discnarge permit. _ _ _ _ Project reouires use of a source of water tAat Coes not have aporoval to serve Drauosed proJec[. — — -. — ' _ oro7ect reQu�res �ater suooly lrom welis ritn greater � � tnan 4i oallons per minute �umoing caDacity. � — — . — � _ CJn,(r•x[+on or ooera[iDn Causing any cOn[anlna[ipn ' 0� ! �uO�IC wdIPI SUO��f SyS[l'm. � � � _ vro�ect �ill edversely a!lect groundwa[er. " � _ L�:oia e��loen[ .ill Er conveyed o/( [ne site to � �.='lic�es •��c� presently do no[ eais[ or n�ve — — — �ne[r:�ace c,f7ac�[7. � . . . _ ��o7e:t re�u�n nq a /ic�lity tnat rould use water in . e�.a:s ai :r.n60 ;alio�s per aa�. — — —.. �'=:e=t �.•ill I+�el� cause s�ltation or otner Ciscnarae � - �^:� an e.is:in� e-ay o� �ater to tne e.tenc [ne[ cnero — — — "�� Cr an opvious visu�l [u�crds[ t0 �aturel conC�n ont, ' . . . C � � 'r , �. ...,;: . . . . � � , 1. 2. 3 �au rr vnr¢yna� r.aa tnv^ � QOEPATE LAp6E �R��=� . . I'�DaL: 1"ocC' DP9JECT � �L��r ImOdCti' ___'__ _"___'_" � � _ 6, '�ILL OROJCCT Al7ER Oa41NAf,F FL�'�, PATTE^9S 04 SIIRFACE !IATER X9 YES . �� 0.!IY�Fi? ...................................................�0 . " Exannie tha: ':ould P.nD�y to Colurm 2 � Droject rnu10 fmoede f1ooQ rater floNs. � . _ _ . — Proiect is lSkely to cause su�stantial erosian. __ _ _. _ Vroject is lncomDa[iCle with e:istt� dratnaae Datterns. �� —. — �Mer lmnacts: � �_ _ LC4CT OY RIq - p0 YFS 7. I�ILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR OUAL1TYi...........................Q O , � Faanoles thei Hould AOOIy to Colurtn 2 . _ ProJect r111 induce�1,900 or more veM cle trips 1n any glven �_ -� _ �our. Vrv�ect rilt result Tn the inclneration of morc Nan 7 ton _� �_ _ rf re�use per hour. 7ro�ect emisslon rate of all contamtnents wi71 excred 5 �_ -: Its. 7er novr or a hea[ source croducing mor. t�an 10 mfllton BTU's Der hour. � _ 0[ner imoatts: _ _ �_ , � Iwo+�T ny m l47c ;IVn l4rupi t 40 YES � 8. NILL PP.OJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED CP, ENOANfERED SPECIESi O O - Examules tha[ Mould Aooly to Column 2 ' Rnduction of one or more species tfsted on the New York __ _ — or Federal list, usin9 tne site, over or neer site or founa on tne site. - - t1e^nval of anr oor[ton ot a crtticel or sioniflcant wild- _ _ __ 1 i tr h�b+tJC. . � _ 400licatinn o1 7e5ticide or tie�OiciJc o�er nnre than _ _ _ t�•�c- a yearotner ttvn foreqr:cwwvl rurpaas. . � 0!1•r icoac[5: � , 9. t11L1 »9dECT SU9S7:pTIALLY AifECT I!pN-THFEAiE:lE9 0A NO YES � E'1�A'1,EdE7 SPECIES? .......................................0 O , . E,n-�Ie ;nat �oula Aooiy to Colunn 2 . � . . fro�^C[ ++ould SuOs[an[ta11y �nter/ere w�t� an•. reSlA9nt _ � _ or �+�q�a[ory �ii� or v�IElifc zpe[�e5. � o�o�ett �rau�res tne r.�val o( r.ore tnan I^. acres nf r.a:ur? /creSC !over 170 vp�ri �n enel or o(n�r lo[]Ilv inporcant �eqe[atio�. _ _� . _ � � � � . . . � ,. 2. �. � !'ALL T� �CTE;!TIAL Cf111 f8?ACT ;� .Q7ERATE IARGE P.EO�JCEO 9Y �NnqfT 1^�aC' Pa�JECT CP4��%� 1"^�R C't ':IS'.'�L or°'O•pCE 19. l.fl.L T9E ocn1F[T AR�C Vlr:�e, °iSTFS C't T!IF 475D4L HO Y�5 . CPP.4ACiEd 9F LIIE �IFiGI{gqR?MO OC CC�"'""IIT�? .............. � � ' '�'i�m�lg5 Ud[ ��Ould Apply to Colunn 2 � ' An fncomratitle visual affec[ caused bv tbe intro�uction 01 new naterials, colars and/or forrs in cnn[rast to the surroundinc landsca�e. . A oroject easily visihle, not easily screened,t4at is � _ _ � oDviously different fron nthers around it. - _ Pro]ect ••ill resutt in the nlirination or najor . � _ �_ screening of scenic views or vistas kno��m to be ` � � important to t�e area. � � Other in0a[t5• ' � 1!'PRCi OY Hf�T02IC� ?f50URCES • 11. NILL PROJECT ICP0.CT ANY SITE OR $TRUCTURE OF HISTORiC. NO YES Fa.E-�:tst�viC ne va�Eo'ITO�lCAL It•MPTANCE? .................Q O Eaacoles [hat ��ould Aoolv to Colurn 2 � _ Prciect occurino rnolly or nartially wi[hin or contiauous _ _ _ to anY �acilitv ar site listed on the National Renis[er at � Mstoric 7laces. _ Anv inoact to an archeologicat site or fossil b?d located _ _ — . within the pro;ec[ site. � _ �Lher in7aCt5: , �_ � . � IHonf,T �7 O�E`1 SPqCE S RErQcATtOt: . 12. WILL THE PANECT AFFECT THE OUAIlTITY OR OUAIITY OF E%ISTIIIG NO YF.S OR FUTURE OPE11 SPACES CR RECP.E.4TIOt1AL OPPORTU'(ITIES?.......Q O ' Examoles that Giauld 0.oply to Column 2 � _ The pernanen[ foreclosure of a future reCreational 0000rtunity. __ _ __ _ A major reduction o( an open s0ace important to the comiunity. -- — Other i�oac[S: - �uonf. nq TCGq�pnaT�7!^� 1J. :'ILL T°ESE °E A'1 EFi�CT TO CXISTf:IC TRAlIS7C4L1ilOt1 110 rES . � $YSi[�.ci ............................................... O O . � E�eFo�oT !net .oula =.vnlv to Colunn 2 � � _ Alterat�o� of prese�t :atterns a/ roveren[ e! neoDle _ _ _ dn0/or g:oa5. Orotect .ill �esuit in severe [ra/Ii[ aro0lens. � �� iR�.lr �r]dCti: ______"_"'_"' ____'"___ _ . - . ',t•• . � � _ � , , ,�,. ��*• - �' 1 Z 3. � • S"U�LL T� pn,TE9TIAL CA7 IHPAC 7'ODERPTE LARGE I REOOCED IMFACT I'17ACT PROJECT L ��DRfT CN E."IERGY � 10. IIILL PPOJECT AFFECT THE COHHUNITIES SOURCES DF FUEL OR NO YES E4EA,Y SUPPLY? ...........................................�O . Eza�oles that Nould A.DD1Y to Column 2 � � _ Praject causing vreater than 5: fncrease in any form of _ _ enerqy used in municipality. — Droject reauiring the Creation or extension of an ener�y ` transnission or suDDly systen t0 Serve more than 50 5inale or'two fanity residences. � � _ Other impatts: �� __ _ _ iMPAfT 011 NOTSE ` . . 15. Nlll THERE BE 09JECTif1NqBLE OCARS, NOISE. GLARE, VIBRATi�N !10 YES � or ELECTRiCAI 'JISTUR9ANCE AS A RESULT OF TNIS PROJECT? ••"OO O Ezar.oles that lloulA Aooly to Colufm 2 _ Blasting withi� 1,590 feet of a hospital, schoot or other _ _ _ Sensitive facility. _ _ Odors �ill occur routinely (�rqre than one hour per day). _ _ _ _ Droject vill nroduce ooerating noise exceedinn the local ambient noise levels� for noise outside of structures. _ Dro]ect will rerove naturat barri?rs that vould act as a _ _ - _ noize screen. - • ,_ �ther inpatts: IPPQC7 ON NEAI,TH F H47_4R05 . � !10 YFS 16. !11L1 DAOJECT AFFECT PUBLIL IIEALTH ANO SAFEfY? .........•••'O O X . Ezamolcs t�at Ilould 4p0�Y to Column 2 _ Droject will cause a risk of exvlosion or release of hazardous _ _ suDstances (i.e. oil. Desticidrz, chemicals, raAiation, etc.) in tne event of accident or uoset conditions, or there will - � he a chronic loc� level discharge or enission. - _ Oroj?ct t�at �•ill �result in Che burial of "hazardnus-was[es" _ �_ ' (i.�. [ox�c, �Dnisonous, hi�hlv reattive, radioac[ive, irritating, � infectious, etc. , inclu:finn was[es that are solid, semi-solid, ��puld Or CO�Catn qd5¢5. ) . ' - _ S[oraoe facilitirs for one million or more aallnns of liouified naturai ;as or o[ner liouids. — — __ 0!�Cr ICOdCCS: _____'_"_"_'�_- _ : . � • c ! . . . �.. . ., . � . s�� n �cre,�r,,.� c.,r, �n�, ;� ' � OOE0.P.TE LFRGE� REOUCED BY fl'.PACT IIIP4CT PROJECt CHANGi �NDAfT 0•'i G�011TH AYD CNFRACT�R OF COYM79ITY !1R 'IEfrpq�Runnn , �J, NiIL FC�JJECT AfFECT TNE CHAPACTES ^F THE E%ISiiN6 ,.. .NOp O C0:!MU81TY? ............................. X . . Exemole that Nould ADoly to Column 2 _ The ooDulation of tAe City, Town or Village in which the _ __ — project is loceted ts likely to arow by more than SS of �esi�nt human poDulation. ' _ The munlciDal budgets for ca01ta1 expendttures or o?era- � _ ._ _ tfn9 services will Sncrease Ey more than 5: per year as a resulC o( [Ais Droject. � VI17 involve any �ermanent faciltty of a non-agrScultural _ — � — use in an agricul Wral district or remove nrime-agricutturai � lands from cvltiva[ion. � The orojeci wtll reolace or eltminate ezlstin9 tacilltte.s, — __ — structures or areas of histarSc importanee to the corte+unity. Develoo+�ent wtll lnduce an influx of a Darticular age ' _ — grouD with SDectal needs. � _ Project wilt set an imDortant Drecedent for future vroiects. _ _ -- _ vroJect wSll relocate 15 or more em�loyees 1n ane or rore — _— Eusinesses. Other imvactr. � - NO YCS 18. IS THERE PUBUC CONTRCYERSY CONCERflf!1G THE PRqJECT? .......Q O . Eze^ol.s tha[ uould AOD�Y to Colunr� Z - _ El;her 5overnren[ or citizens of adjace�t cor.n:unities _ � have eaoressed oo7osition or rejected t�e Orotec[ or have — — no[ 0len cOntac[ed. _ OSjections to tne nroject from within t�e community. " — � (F hNY ACT10'7 1�J 7ART 2 IS IDENTIFIED AS A � � � . - � POTEi1T1AL IARf,E IY.PACT 01l IF YOU G,4V0T OETERMINE -'� � � THE MAGiIIN�E OF iH7AC7, OROCEEO TO 7ART 3. . P9RTIOt15 OF EA� COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: �E7EPM(11AT[ON PART I _ PAAT I1 — 7ART 3.__ �Con review of the In(or*ratian recorded an thls EAF (Parts 1, 2 � and 3) ane conslEerina bot� [�e maanitude and imnortance of each 1rt9ect, 1t fs reesonaDly determined that: PREVARE A IIE�ATIVE OECLARATiON . � A. The oroJect will result in no major imoacts and, theretore, O , . - is one wh�ich nay no[ cause significan[ damaae to tne environmen[. � B. Altnouoh tne oroje[[ could have a signifitan[ ef(ect on the � !nv�ronren[. [�crn will not Ce a Signifi[an[ e!(c[t in Chiz cdie PREPAFE A FEf�T1YE f1:ClAFAT[Ot1 Eeceuse tne nit�qat�on meeTures destri6ed in CART J have heen �- O �ncludeC as pnrt of the nro0o;ed Oro)ect. C. -7he Orojett vill resul[ in one or more major ndverse imoatts GREPARC COSITII'E CECL3FATW�1 PROCEEO NITH EI t�a[ cennot �e reCuteC and may [auie ziqnificen[ Eamage CO O t�e Cnviror.r.en[. �e[e 5�anacure o( Ros;ons�olt utrlciai �n Leaa 4gencv ��gr.aWre or :renerer (�i a�Hrren[ �ro� resnons�olr o�ncer) �� nt or c7�e na^e or resoans�ole orfic�al Sn LeaO Agenc+_ . • � � � . .,_ .. ;• , .. ,. • • .y ' � ' E4F ' EIlVIRDqHENTAI ASSESSHEH7 - VART lIl �� ' � EVAIUATI01i OF TH� C!P�CTAYCE OF INPACTS 1'IFOR`U1110t1 . . .....__ .. .-"._.--- - - Pari 3 is preDared if o�e or more impatt or effect is considered to be Dotentially larae. , - The anount of writina necessary to ansHer vart 3 may b? determined by ansNering the avesttan: !n �rie comnletin9 Che instructions below have I ptaced in this record sufficient information to indicate t�e- reasonaCleness of nv decfsions? INSTRUCTIOt75 . . - � Cocqlete the follawinq for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 0` Part 2: 1. BHefly descri6e the imvact. . � � 2. Describe (if apoticable) how the lmpact might be mitigated or reduced to a 1e55 than larae imnact by a �ec[ c�ange. - 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonante to conclude that this inract is imeorta � to the minictpality (city, town or viltaqe) in ��bich the project is located. - - - To ansxer the question af importante, tonsider: � - The probability of the fmpact or r.ffect accurrinq - The duretion of the impact or effect - Its irreversibility, including permanen[ly lost resources or vatues - Ilhether the impact or effect can be controlled . - The regional consequence of the impact or effect . � . . - I[s ootential divergence from local needs and 9oals . � � - I:hether knoNn objettions to the O��Ject apoly to this impatt or ef(ect. � DETEr�lryAT19N QF S1G7!IFICA!ICE � : - � An action is considered [o br. significant if: �ne (or �rore) imoact is determined to both larne and its (their) conseauence, hased on the revir a6ove, is inoortan[. � CAPT I11 STATE9E.'IT$ � (Cnntinue on Attachmen[s, as needed) � _ � _ ,,'. � : � � � { ! . . ► ' 26. ADorovels: a. Is any Federal permit reauired? _Yes �_No E. Does Droject involve State or Federal funding or financing? _ Yef _�No .. c. Locat and Regional aOCrovals: � Avoroval Revuired Submittal Ao�roval . ' (Yes, No) (Tyae) (oace) (oace) City, Town, l'ftlaoe Board ___ City, Town, Village Planning Board e s S�S�'f— S'f'$7' ,, tity, Town, Zoning Board � Ltty, Caun[y Health�Department 25 �VI �— Otner local agencies � Other re9ional agenties � State Agencies , � � � ' Federal AgencSes C. INFOR�ATIOHA� DETAILS - - � , Attach any addtttonal infarmation as may be needed to clarify your projett. If there are or may be any � adverse tmpacts assaciated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the m^asures whitA can be taken to mitfgate or o m. PREPARER'S 5I6VATURE: �7� . TITLE: Agent REPRESE'iTING: . SU2 Hanauer & JOd[i Bagley DnrE: July 29 , 1987 a ' _ .. .�. .. - . .ww..Frq <...._ .. _ . . _ ... . ._ .. .. _ , � . �`� S�FFOG� P � � T D � � � SL Y � Southold, N.Y. 11971 s. � (516) 765-1938 Ocbb�-aa ,�9�� Robert Brown Sidney and Bowne and Son Hauppague, NY 11787 Dear Mr. Brown: Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following: �A plication of (Njajor subdivision, 'nor subdivisio , site plan) Q YYl j,�PY `I t'��L _ Hamlet `��(j�� MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File I/5��. U1��0 I1 Suffolk County Tax Niap No. 17�0� � -�D � `1' Sketch plan Preliminary map Street Profiles Grading Plan Preliminary site plan Final Map Other � GOTJ�_p� LOY1q t'�VIVbY1MLrt�Zt.1 I�TY�C.YIt �S1�hA Comments: W��d v'ee u -ta a PJ� . Very truly yours, `��c O,�,t�k:� ��'d�— BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD - _ „ • : ,;. : ;, � � • • '• ' % ' ” RECEIVED BY . � ` TOiVN OF SOUTHOLD $��H'YY'�+�lj'��ARD ' " Iil1U r� EAf DATE ' EMYIRO�IMENTAL ASSESSMENT -�PART I � Proiect Infornstton � MOTICE: TAts aocument +� desiened to asslst i� determining whether [he at:ion proDosed may have a signific effecc on tne enviro•,.+..nt. Diease coeq:lete the entire Data Sheet. Answers .o these questions uitl be c�r.s as oart o/ tne apoli;ation for aDOroval and may be subject to further verification and�DuDltc review. irov �ny additione� �n�ormaCion you Eelieve w111 he needed to comolete PARTS 2 and 3. ' � - It is exoectea cnat cc�oleti�n o1 the EAF wi11 De dependent on informatfon currently avallable and wi11 not involre ner s[ud�es, reseirc� er inyesciaation. If tnfortcation requirina such addiUonal work it unavai�Dle.. so tndicate and soecify eat� instance. . • ;IANE Of OROJECT: � � -- NAME ANU ADORE55 OF OY.HER (if Diff•rent� � Hanauer & Baqley �Set-off Sue Hanauer & Joan Ba le . amel � . - -- " A�JaE55 AND NANE OF A�DLICANT: . Stre?c) rn�h��r� a � -�- � David E. Kapell , as agent Woodbur N.Y. 11797 eme �� Sta[e �p]- �-- 400 Front Street Box 463 eustt�.ss PHonE: 477-0100 trcec Greenport , N.Y. 11944 . _... _ ta�e � �P . : � DESCRIVTICY OF vaa,7ECT� (Briefly descNbe type of proJect or actton) �nnl i c�an} � nrnnncPs . �D- f1i v i Ao � p � � � . . '?----ynre.�r�f S S S Fi a * tW0 r c; �entiai bnildinQ lo (PLfASE CONPl.ETE EACH QUESTION - Indltate N.A, if not aDP1lcaDle) � �� .�� . � � . . ' . � A. SITE DESCRiPTIOH � . � � (Physical setting of overail project, both develoned and undeveloped areas) . � 1. Ganerel cnaracter of the land: Generally unlform slope X .Generally uneven and ralltna or irre�ul 2. Prcsent land use: L'roan , industrial , Commercial , SuburDan , Rural , Fores _, Agritulture _�_, �th=r v�_an�i — --_ —. 7- iotal acreaqe of oroject areas�B�res. � _ � Aooroximate acreage: -�Presen[ly After Completton � �� Presenfly A(�er fompl � MeaCow or Brushland _acres _at�es Ilater Surface Aree �� Z,_yacres ZS__ ForesceE .3_acres �_acres Unvegetated (ro[k, 4ariculturai � � _acres _acres eartn or fill) ___acres __ 9.t1anC (Fre;nvater or Roads, 6uilAinny T�ael ns ner Arttcles d�d Ot�er �ave0 � . -'a� -: �r °.C.L.! —_acres _acres Surfntes . __a�,�= -- lltner (indic�te ty�e) acres a. '��e: �s ^-eaom��a�c :oit t;�or(s) an nro;ect sitet _Loam� sand &_ gravel . 5• i '��e :ner� p�OrG[[ oulCro�O�noi on +rnlPc[ S1V' "—.Yps X ._ 9p ""'---__--' 9:1::b � ••'a: :i Cq0!n [C �eCrcck.' '�'_ __""'-.. __. . C) -- _.__1'n •'!e ,. _ - .-- _ � � • . � � ' 6. Apv�oxinate vercentaoe of pro0ased oro,�ect site with slooes: 0-lOS 1 0 0 ': 1^-15' Z: 15: or greater _%. — — 7. Is Orojec: cantiguous to, or contain a buildinn or site listed on the Hational Regtster of Historic Places? _Yei _�Ho e. What 1s the deotn to the water tabte? _feet qreater than 27 feet g, po hunting or ffshing apportunities presently ezist in the proJect area? _Yes X No • 10. Ooes projett stte contain any species of plant or animal life that is identitied as threatened or endanaered - _Yes �_lo, according to - Identify eath sDecies 11, Are there any unidue or unusual land forms on the project site? �(t.e. tlifts, dunes.—other geologlcal fomations - Yes X Plo. (�escri6e _ ) 12. I5 the Droject site Dresently used by the community or neighborhood as an open s0ace or recreatian area - �.Yes No. 1J. Daes the present site offer or include scenTt views or vista: known to be imDortant to the community? _Yes �_Mo 1<. Streams wfthin or contiguous to project area: N.A. � � �� a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary 15. lakes. Ponds. Vetland areaz Nithin or contiguous to project area: . d• 4ame _Nn namP : b. Size (in acres) 2 _ 5 anrPs 16. Mhat is the dominant land u5e and zoning tlassificatfon within a 1/4 mile radius of tAe projett (e.g. single family residential, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story)$ingle family residenti�l & agricultural . B. PR0,IECT DESLRIPTION � . 1. Vhysical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as avoropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage orned by project s0onsor S _ S acres. � b. Project acreage develooed: 5 5 .:tcres initially;�L acres ultimately. . c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped _�_. � . d. Lengtl� of Oroject, in miles: p� � (ft apDroFriate) � e. If project is an eaDansion of existing, indfcate percent of.expansian proposed: building square foot- age N.A. ; developed atreage , . f. tlurtber of off-strcr.t oarking sDaces existino N.A.: proposed � g. Naaimum vehicular trios generated per hour N.A. (upon canpletion of project�) � h. If residenCial: Number and type of housinG units: • . i � :ne family _ Two Family � Multiple Family Condominium - Initial 2 � Ultimate 2 1. !/: firienta[ion � � - � -:'e�gncornoaa-Ci[y-Regional Estima[ed Emnloymen[ � Corrercidl � � InCus!f�d� � ). Total he+gnt cf taliest �r000sea struccure N.A. feec. �� ' _. __ s � � . � � Z, Nor much na[urnl material (i.e. rock, earth, eic.) witt be removed fran the sSte - � tons N cubic ya 3. Hor r.any acres of veqetation� (trees, zhrubz, ground covers) will be re�roved from sit^ _N.A .acr=5. 4. Mill any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important veaetatSon be removed Dy tn�s project' _Yes _��No . . . 5. Are tnrrc any plans for re-vxgetation to reolace that removed during construction? _Y.es �_'�a 6. If sin9le ohase Drojett: Anticioated oeriod of construction ��months, (including demolitfon). � 7. it mu1H-nhased oroject: a. Total number of phases anticipated No. b. Anticioated date of cormen[ement Dhase '. month _�ear (intluain� N.A. demolitfon]� — • c. ApDroximate comoleNon date final Dhase mon[h.._�ea•. � � d. Iz phase 1 H nancially deDendent on subseauent ohases? _Yes _ 8. Ni11 blasting occur during construtttont YesN.A. No �� .� . � � 9. Hunber of jobs generated: during construction N_A: after projec[ is complete _ � . 10. Number of fabs eliminated by this Droject N.�A. � , 11. Mill project reduire relocation of any projects or facilfties? _Yes X No. If yes, exclain: 12. a. Is surface or :u6zurface liqufd Naste disDOSaI involved? X Yes _Ho: . b. ]f yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) Sewaqe _ _. c. I/ surface disposal name af stream into wM ch effluent wi11 be discharged N .A . . . 13. Vill surface area of existing lakei, Donds, streams, bays or oiher surface waten+ays be increased or decreased by pr000sal? Yes X No. 1E. Is project or any vortion of project located in the 100 year ftocd vlain? Yes _y�No 15. a. Does Droject involve disvosal of soiid waste? Yes X No b. It yes, wi11 an existing zolid waste disnosal facility Ee used? _Yes __!�o � c. If yes, give name: ; tocation d. !Ifll any wastes not go into a sewage disoosal system or into a sanitary landfill? _Yes X 16. Nitl ornject use herbicides or pr.sticides? _Yes .,�_No � � 17. Hill project routinely Droduce odors (more than one hour oer day)? _Yes X No 18. uili project produce ooerating noise exceeding the local amGience noise levels? _Yes X No 19. Vill Droject resul[ in an increase in energy use? X Yes _40. If yes, indicate type!s) , Flectricity & fuel for two homes . . 20. I! water suooly is from wetls indicate oumoing caDacity gals/minute.2 resid2ntial � . 21. Tocal ancicinated watcr usaqe oer day _ ___aals/day. S2@ aboVe �''ells . 22. Zoning: a. Ilha; �s doninant zoning claszification of sitc? A A� rlCultudrl/Re5ldEnti• . . ��---- —... � � � b. Curren[ soeciiic zonina ctassification of si[e Same ,. !s aro=oseA use co^s�sten: ,n th nresent zoninG? Yes � d. 1/ no. ��dttate de5ired icrin� .�. _ � � . . . . ► ' 26. ADorovels: a. Is any Federal permit reauired? Yes _�No 0. Does project lnvolve State or Federal funding or financing? _ Yes _�No , c.� Local and Regional apPravals: � Aporoval Reavired Submittal ADoroval � � (Yes. No) (Type) (Oate) (Date) City, TONn. PTllaae Board City, Tawn, Village Planning Board e s 5��— �7 City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Health DeDartment e S �VI g7`�� Otner total agencies Other regional agencies � — State Agencies ' Federal AgencSes _ C. (NFOR"ATtONAL DETAILS � � . Attach any addittonal informatfon as may be needed to clarify your proJect. if therc a�e or may De any - adverse impacts associated w5th the proposal. Dlease discus5 zuch Smpacts and the m•asures whic� can he taken to mttigate or o m. PRE7ARER'S SIG4ATURE: �7� TIiLE: Agent REPRESE47ING: . Sue Hanauer & Joan Bagley ontE: July 29 , 1987 a ____ ___ RECEEVED 6Y ' � �� ' '�.. �; , � , � SOUiHOI�, iGN'N PLANNING BURRD � �� • �L�� N 41�81 , EAF DArE� . ENYIRONMENTAL ASSESSHENL - PART II � Project Imoacts and Their Maanitude Generoi Inln��ti.�_ :crad CarefullY) - In complecing t.^•e fom t�e reviewer should be guided by the Question: Fave my decisians and de[erm-. Deen reascr.zo�e? The reviewer is nat expected to be an exoert environmental analyst. � .. � - ldentifying that ae ¢ffBCt will Ee potentTaily large (Column 2) d025 nOt mean th3t it iS 8150 nCceS= , siani`!caot. ar.y irrgr effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. 9y idenr fyi: erreci in celumn 2 sireply asks that it be looked at further. . _ ' - ihe Examoles provided are to assist the reviewer by shoHing types of effects and wherever eazsi�le t ' of maqnicuae that would trigger a response in Column 2. The eaamples are generally apolica6le Chroc State and for most situa[ions. But, for any sDecific project or site other examDleS and/or lower th may he more aoproariate for a Potential Large Impact rnting. . �. - Each project, on each site, in each locality, wilt vary. Therefore, the exanvles have been offered They do not constitute an exhausttve tist af impacts and thresholds to answer each �uestion. - The number of exampies per question does not indicate the importance of each question. IHSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefutty) � . a. Ansver each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there rili De anv effect. b. Ma�be answers should be considered as Yes answers. � c. If answering Yes to a auestion then check the apPro�riate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the o0 size of the imoact. if impact threshold equals or exceeds any exampie Drovided, check column 2. imoact will occur but threshold is lower [Aan examDle, check column 1. d. (f reviewer has doub[ about the size of the impact then consider the imoact as notentially large Droceea to PART 3. ' � e. If a ootentially larqe imoact or effed can be redoced by a chan9e in the projeU to a tess than magnituce, place a Yes in co!�^�n 3. A No resoonse indicates� that such a reduction is not oossib 1. 2. SFU1Ll TO POTENTIAL CAN IHi � MODERATE LARr,E REOUC- � � IMPACT INPALT PROJEC 1MPACT ON LAt10 ' �� NO YC$ 1. 411L TNERE 9E A.'7 :fFEr? pc q RESUIT OF A PHYSICAL CHANf,E TO O O � PRJJECT SiTE? E■anolos that Noula .4coly to Colunn 2 � _ A�y co�stru=tio^ on <lopes of 15S or greater, (15 foot rise oer � -. ' 100 -foot o� lenat^.;, ,^r_where the aeneral slooes in the project -- — . — - area eaceed 10:... - ' _ Construct'.on on Land wherr. the denth to Che aa[er tabie is less tnan J feet. � — -- -- — �oni[ru[[ion c(�daved narkina area fnr 1,^^^ or more vehicles. - . _ fnn;truc:inn on l,tnd where bedrock �s exnosed or qenerally � � ��em n 3 feet cf ex�st;ng ground surface. � -- -- _� fcnscrac!+o� �tra• wi71 cont�nue for more than 1 �ear or involve C4•e !har� 'c^ '+'.a;C Or :taoe. —� . �_ Ex[?vr!ion ��r r�r�ny �urpo5es [ha: '.uould ->nove nore than 1 ,�QC . . . . ;pr.s cf r.d;vral n„er�al (i.e. rock o� soil) per vedr. —' — _ __ C^.�S:r�,L�On 0� �lny new Sani[a^y land/!I1, 5 _ _ , . ; __ _ _ __ . � � , 1. 3. c!•4lL TD vniE.'ITtAL [An 19raCT BE . 7ERAiE ��RGE REDtICE� BY , �DA T �MpGf.T �oOdE[T CBANf,� _ Constructian in a Oesiqnated flmEway. _ OCAer impacts: _"______' — _—___.�� Yi5 � �� - 2. YILL iHERE BE AN EfFECT TO ANY UNIOUE OR UNIISUAL IPN� if1RN5 /-�� -FOUAD ON THE SITE? (i.e. c11ft;, dunes, otolopical forme- �X }( � ttons, etc.) ' `JtJ _ Snecific lan6 forms: ,� If�VaCT ON VATFR � • .� � - � � � • NO YES � D. HIIL VRO.7ECT AFFECT ANY NATEP. BODY DESiGNATE� AS ..........Q PNOTECTED? (UnGer Articles 15. 23, 25 of the Envir- onmental Conzervetion Lar, E.C.L.) . Exanoles that aou10 Aoply ta Colunn 2 ' . _ Dredgtno nore than 10q cubic yards of matertal iran � c�annel o� a protected siream. � � � _ Construction in a designated fres�water or tidal wetland. _ Other imDatts: � 6. Y(lL 7ROJECT AFFECT ANY t70N-VROTELTED EXISTiNf, OR MFH NO YES BOOY OF VIATiR? ...........................�................. XO O Ex:>oles [�at Nould ApD1Y to Column 2 . _ A 10: increase or decrease 1n the surtace aree o/ any bady ot racer or more tnan a 70 acre lncrease or decrease. — —� _ Constructlon of � Dody of water that exceeds ln acres of - surface area. . � . — — — _ Otner imnacti• ——-------'----'_ _ _ _ �1�6 Yf5 — — — S. vllL V40JECT AFFECT SURFFCF. 7R ,ROIIN04ATER �IiALITY? O E�anol.s tnat !+ould Apyly r.o [olunn 2 . X � _ Prn)ec[ will require a diz[narge permii. _ _ _ _ Project reQuires use of a source of wa[er that does not �ave auoroval to serve 7roposed Oroject. — — -� — � _ ��Iect reQuires rater suooly from rells witb areater • � cnan <i nailons per minute ?umoing caDacity. . � . � � _, Cuns[r�tn an or ooera[ion tausfng any con[anina[i0n � ui e ouoiic �eter suoply system, � —� — — _ vro�ecc will adversely a�fect grounaHater. � _, ��:o�a e��loent vlll bt conveyed o1f t�e site to � � ��='��[�e5 �n�Cn DresenUy 40 n0[ Ca�SC Or �dve � —� — Ind]�:udCt C]pJCI[%. . . � �. P��le:: re�u�n nq e /an ticy tna[ rou1C use ra[er in - P�C25S 0/ :P,q�f) gallons per Eav. —.. ��-:eC( �n��l I�tPIJ CduiP S��tdL10n Of O[�K d�SC�drdp - '^:o an e.+sn nq Ca:� o� water to tne erten[ tnet cnere — — — �'�� ce an cor,ous visuel concrast to nacural conai n oni. � _ ___. _ . _ _ _ • � , . • , ,.: :, . . � � , 1. 2. 3. �uu tc VOTEYTIa� r.aa �nvzc � hDE�ATE LAFGE pEJGCEJ � .. . Ivo�C7 I�•vaCr Ca9JECT [; � 9U�r ImoACtS' �_�'_' _"__'__ �� _ 6, 9ILL VROJCCT ALTER DA4INAf,E FL�", F4TTE^9S 09 SIiPFPCE !IATER RO YES . RU47fF? ...................................................�0 _ ' E:annle tha: ':ould P.npIY m Colum 2 � _ Pmject wnult� imoede flood watcr flows. � �_ -- � _ Vroiett Is likely to cause suDstantial erosion. �_ _� � _ Crojeci Is lncomDaNble rlth exist5�q dralnaae wtterns. �� —. — ()tht� tmnaets: _ _ IMD4CT ON 4�q � p0 YES 7. Ii1LL 7ROJECT AFFECT AIR OUALITY?...........�. Q �O - Faanoles that Hould ADp1Y to Colurtn 2 . _ ProJec[ rtil induce 1,900 or morc veh1Q e trtps tn any glvm �_ -� — �our. _ Dro�ect rtll result in the Sncineration ot morc than 1 tan _ __ _ M refuse per hpur. Pro�¢t emisston rate of a11 contanlnents wi11 ezc�eA 5 __ — —.- 1Ds. oer hour or e heat inurce croEucing more t�an ID million BTU's per hour. � Otner lmoacts• .. (roe�T n� oi eq7c .�yn ev��e� e 90 YES � 8. NIIL PP.O,)ECT AFFECT ANY iNREATENED OP, ENOANf.ERE'J SPECfES? O O � , . Eaamules that Mould ADoly to COlumn 2 ' _ Rod�ction o( one or morc sDectez ltsted on the New York _ � _ _ or federal list, using [Ae site, over or near site or found on the site. . � _ tlemoval of anv �orN on of a erttical or sianifieant wild- _ _ . lite hab�tJt. . � _ 400licatinn o1 7esticide or he�biciJe over more than _ _ G•ic± a yeero[ner ct�n {ora9r:cwtuql purpoacs. . � _ 9!1.r ic.patti: _ _ . 9. IIILI ��JECT SU95TA;1TIRLLY AFFECT I!ON-THPEATE:IE9 OR NO YES - - E`i7avaEaED SPECIES? .......................................0 O . - E.n-�le tnat uoula Aooly to [otunn Z . � _ .fro�^CC would SUET[an[ta�1y �nCerfere wltn dm� resid?nt _ _ __ or n�ycamry f�T� or wildlffc s7e[�eT. � � o�o)ect �rou+res [he r•mp�d� 0� �a�! t�dn 1^. dCreS n( na;ure �cres[ !over IOn veerT i� dne) or otner Ipc.tllv �n�ytnnt ��eqecatian. � _ _7_ . � ,:, _ • � • • � 1. 2. 3. . . ."ALL T� °CTE1iTl�l CA:I It:PACi iE CDERATE IpRGE P.EOVCED �Y . ��nar; I"�4C' GRnJECT C"4r„E pmtCT C'7 ';ISI"LL or•":'RCE � — _. 19. t.11l TvE ocnJfC7 Avr�CC VIE:�S. '�ISTAS ^.R T!IF 4t51NL NO Y£5 ' CYDRACTER Oi TIIE �IFIGHB�R�MD OC CO"""91T�? .............. �� ' . E:am,les cnat �'ouid A�ply to Column 2 � ' An incomratitie viival atfect caused by the intro�uctinn of neN material5, colors and/or torrz in rnntrast ta the surroundinc landsca�e. — ._ A oroject easilv vtsfhle, not easily screenod,[9at is � oCviously different fron nMers around it. ' _ Projett •.Ill result in the elimination or najor . � � Screeninq of Scenic vSews or vi5taz knonn to be � - � fmportant to the area. � O[her inoatts• � � - � IMCACi OY HISTORIC Rf50URCE5 • 11. NIIL PROJECT 11'OACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, YO YES PP.E-R[ST�o1L Oi VAlEO.'7TO�:CAL ICfOPTANCE? .................Q O Ezacales tAat ��ould Aooly to Colur.n 2 � Prciect occurina v�otly or nartially within or tontiavous _ _ to anY �acili[v or site li5ted an the National Reaister of � hlsmric places. . � _ Anv inoact to an arcneological site or foszil E?d located _ _ — . within tne project site. � Other inpac[s: � /Mvef,T 0`7 Oorry cpp�E 6 P.ECQEATiON, . 12, li(LL THE DRnJECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR OUALITY OF E%(STit7G HO YF.S OA FUTURE OPEft SPdCES OR RECP.E.4TIONAL OFPORiU'1(TIES?.......Q O � Examoles that Nould Aoply�to Column 2 � � _ The Oernanent foreclosure of a future recreational 0000r[unity. __ — _ _ A major rrduction ot an open sDace important to the [omiuni[y. -- — Otner i�oacts: . ' �upnr� M� TopqcDnAT�T!^�V 13. .^ILl TuEF° °E A'I EfiECT TO E%ISTi;IL TRAHSPORTATION NO YES . - SYSin.co ............................................... O O � . E.aroles [na[ '.oula ;onlv to Colunn 2 � � _ Altere[�oo o� pre5en[ pJ[[erns o/ rove�^e�t ef neoO�P — _ _ anaior ,oaaz. � Dro�et[ +�II resul[ in Severe Cra(fi[ aroElems. � _ _ �. _. __ itEer �r]dC[i: ______"" _"'_—"'"_._ � — ..� , ' , •. . ' �� . : . � • , .. �*• . '' 1 � 3. � � • $MALI TO PRTE9TIAL CAiI fYPqLT F!pOERPTE LA".6E � REOJCED B' IHFACT I'17pCT PROJECT Ck; ��vP�T CN E`IERGY � � 10. NILL CROJECT AFfELT THE CONHUN[TIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO YES E4ER�Y SUDPLY? ...........................................�O � . Examoles that Would A.Dp1Y to Column 2 . � � _ Project causing areater than 5: increase in any form of _ enerqy used in municipality. — — — � _ Project reauiring the treation or extension of an energy _ _ _ tranznissian or suovly system to serve more than 50 sinqle or'two fanily residences. • _ OCher impatts: IHP4fT�011 Npf$E � 15. WILL TNE0.E BE 09JECTIt1NA8LE OCORS, NOISE, ,LARE, VIBRATI�N NO YES or ELECTRICAL D15TL'R9ANLE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ••"OO O Exar.olez that WoulA Aooly to Columi 2 _ Blasting within 1,5qo feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facilitv. — — -- _ Odors will occur rovtinely (more than one hour per day). � _ _ _ _ Project wflt oroduce overating noise exceedin� the lacal a�bient noise levels for noisc outzide of structures. ,_ Droject will rernve natvral barri?rs that would act as a noise screen. - • —" — — � �ther in�attS: TF'�pCT ON HEALTH R HAZ4R�5 !I� YFS 16. !11L1 DROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC IIEALTH ANO SAFETY? .........•••'O O X . FzamolPs that Nould 4pp1Y to Column 2 _ Droject wi11 cause a risk of exolosion or release of hazardous � substances (i.e, oil, Oesticidr.s, chemicals, raAiation, etc.) in the event of acciden[ or voset condi[ions, or there will � � he a chrom c tooi level discharge or enission. � _ Oroject that witl �resul[ in the burial of "hazardnus�wastes" � ' (i.=. toaic, �onisonous, hi9hly reactive, radioac[ive, irritating, � infeccious, etc. , inciudinn wastes [hat are solid, semi-solid, ��Quid or contain qa;es. ) . � � _ S[araae facilitins for one nillion or more aallons of liauified natural yas or otner liouids. — _ �;�er trtDACtS: � .n. ' � __ _ _ . . . � • . . . . ,� , . � ll !� ?Gi:;iilnl C�6 tM y� � . ODERP.TE IARf>E� REDUCED BY � IYPACT IHC4LT PROJECT CHAHGi . �!!OACT 0'I GaO:lTH ANO CHARACTFR OF COeI^.1!liTY OR .'I�if,HR�R��np 17. NILL P¢O,IECT AFFECT THE CNAPACTE4 �F TNE E%ISTiNG NO YES CO'?AINITY? ................................................0 O Ezemole that Nould RDoly m Column 2 The oo0ulatfon of the City, Tow� or V111age Sn which the _ _ — Dro}ect is located ts likely to grow by more than SS of rosfEent Auman paDulatfon. � _ TAe mun1N oal Dudgets for caoital ez0enditures or o?era- � _ _ .— tlnq services will fncrease by more than 5. per year as a � result of CAis Droject. Ytll involve any oermanent facSilty of a non-agritultural _ __ — — use in an agricultural distN ct or rertave nrime-agricultural � lanAs (rom cultivation. � The oro]ect vill reolace or etlmtnate extsting facilittes. — _ — S[ruetures or areaz of Aistort[ importance to the tommunity. Develoo++ent will tnduce an inftuz of a parttcular age � _ — — group witn spectal needs. - _ Project rill set an important Drecedent for future Droiects. _ _ � � DrOjeCt will �llOCatB 15 or morc Bmnloy![5 In On! 0� ro�! � � �— euz;nesses. Other fmoatts: � � NO YCS 16. I$ THERE PUBLIC CONTRCVFRSY CONLERYING THE PROJECit .......� O . EYL'"�1�5 that Would ApD1Y to Column 2 - _ E1:her government or [itizens of adjateat tocr..unities _ _ _ ' have ezDressed oo7osftion or rejecteE the Droiect or have no[ oeen contac[ed. _ OSjectfons to the nroject from witMn the community. ' — � � IF 1111Y ALTIOY Ih FART 2 IS IDE71TiFiEO AS A � � � - � POTEi1T1AL LARfE IY.PACT OR iF YOU CAN!10T �ETERMINE � �� THE MAGHINOE OF IMVACT, ONOCEED TO PART ]. PQRTIONS OF EAF [OMPLETED FOP �THIS PAOJECi: � OETEPti1tIATf7N PARi I _ iART I! — DART 3__ UCon review o( t�e tnforsatton retorded on this EAF (Parts 1, 2 � and J) anC consldertna both the maenitude and lmnortance of each irt9ect, It is reesonably determined t�at: PREPARE A flE�pT1VE OECLARATION • A. The OroJect �will result in no major imoacts and, [herefore, O , - 15 one �hich nay not cause significant damaae to [he environment. � � B. Alcnouah the oro.ject could have a sigM ficant effecS on the � �nvironnent, tnere will no[ Ce a signifi[an[ e�fett in [his ca5e PREPARE A NEf�TfYE �;CLAFATIOq � Decause tne nitlnation measures describeE in VA81 J have been �- O ��CIuCeE dT DArt of [Ae orapo5ed pro)e[t. . C. -The oroject will result in one or more ma}or adverse imoac[s GREPARE POSITII'E CE:IAHATWtI PROCE;� NI7H EIS tnac cennot oe reducee and may cause siqm ficanc Camage [o O the envlror¢en[. ace ��ture of R�s;ons�Dlt 'urliciai �n �eea� 4gencv S�S^d[ure ot :ren�rer (if C�fterent rro� re5noni�ole orrtce�) . � ��[ or (ype �d^e o� resO��S�Die orflCtdl . . in �tdC Agen[� . . ' '1� - __-. ._... ____. . . . ' � ,. PL• . �, • � ��1 • E4F � ENVIROqHENTA� ASSE55�1ENT - PART I1I ` � � � � EVRUJATIOtt OF TNc 1"Pr1RTA9CE �F IM7ACT5 1'ffORltAT10t1 . .'.."- � —�- - - Part 7 is preDared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially larae. , - The airount of xritinu necezsary to anzHer oart 3 may b? determined by ansNering the auestion: tn briefl• comnleting tAe instructions �elow have I piaced in this record sufficient information to indicnte t�e reasonaoleness of nv decisions? IHSTRUCTIOt75 - . � . � Car7lete the fotlowinq for each impact or effect fdentified in Column 2 0` Part 2: 1. Brleily dezcribe the imvact. . � I. �escrlbe (if aDolicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than laroe imnact by a p Ject c�ange. 3. Aased on the information available, decide if tt is reasonable to conclude [hat this inract is tmoortant � to tAe minictoality (tfty, toNn or villaqe) in ��hich the Droject is located. � - - - - To answer the question of importance, tonsider: - The probability of the impact or r.ffect occurring - The duration of the impact or effect - Itz irreversibility, including permanently lost resources or values - Ahether the impact or effect can be controlled � - The regional consequence of the impact or eff?ct - , . - Its potential divergence from tocal needs and 9oals . � � - Lhe[her known objections to the prnject a;+oly to thSs impact or effect. - DETEP�INATI9N QF SIGBIFICA!ICE � . - � �-- An action is considered to be significant if: � nne (or more) imoact is detern:ined to both larne and 1ts (their) conseavence, hased on the review above, is SnoortanL � CAPT I11 STATEYE.'ITS � � (Cnn[inue on At[achmen[s, as needed) . . . ` • � RECENED BY KAPELL REAL ESTATE, I1vC. �1��1n�'� p�N��i6 B��D 400 Front Street Post Office Box 463 � �' Greenport, New York 11944 516-477-0100 BRANCH OFFICES 21 North Farty Road,Box 3009 Shelter Islend,New York 11964 (516) 749A100 30 Flanders Road,Box 1771 Rivarhead,New York 11901 . . (516) 369-0100 Ms . Diane Schultz Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Ref : Hanauer & Baqley Set-off August 24 , 1987 Dear Diane : Pursuant to the Planning Board ' s request i enclose herewith a com- pleted long form environmental assessment regarding the subject project . Thankyou for your help. Sincerely , CR.r.��- David E . Kapell RECE�VED BY SOUTHUtD T04iN PIANNIN6 BOARD �J, 1[; 9 � 14f2� DATE %, _ ��_ _ T�WN OF SOUTHOLD I�OPERTY RECORD CARD � ,�f�' OWNER STREEf VILLAGE DISTRICT SUB. LOT Y�c..__ - ,. , � ` , ^ , . ,. �i ;�`- �� -+��- c�_�.x_ ,_�cr� ��1s.�,_+,�Q.�,,, ��ti ,``�%`` �.,I FORMER OWNER S-E`p��Nsc�c� N E � � � --� ACREAG ��:.. , , �.� � ^ � . . , , 1,P,�..� �; , .�, �"� t� � y p . g� W ^ TYPE OF BUILDING �� '"` ?��c� �G�-v� �' (.�tr��Y2_.. � 1 � 13�� C��aI�,� �/��,��a�� Iu6.� � . '�)I'� �� 1'�'� _ — —� RES. yJJ SEAS. VL,�--- PARM COMM. I IND. CB. MISC. I Est. Mkt. Value LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE REMARKS � Y1, � ' � � v�r � — _�� ,� ' �' / •�� I :.?G o,, •��v � •� / o ' � r t; A /`'.3 - L'731f3 e 4�9 _ _ ._ ___ _ � � _ . , � rJ 'S-9g�Ll7 �J�� '�"7�-'�"•�'fF/SUN 'iONGit-5!ll. ��.•'E /(Hi - �JUUC...�` /sa/�.� .�P /f�/SJ co��s/r rje w dwc /� �/� �/Ge a�n �-� -- 7 04 t3�� 2 �.�n��s< i � z��.,- �t_� ��c�.�i i ��.�, i � ,�,,� , AGE BUILDING CONDITION � _. -- __...w�.._._, _ - NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FRONTAGE ON WATER � �I Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value FRONTAGE ON RO/�D 7�0, /1� + --- � — Tilloble 1 BULKHEAD Ti e 2 DOCK �/J ' --- -- Tillable 3 Woodland � _____..---_` �a -� d ..�, �'"�c��Q J Brushland House Plot � ��GA . 6 D O Total � �� S -- — � � g�FFD(A� P ti < T D � � � SL � Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 Robert Brown Sidney and Bowne and Son Hauppague, NY 11757 Dear Mr. Brown: Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following: Application of (N�ajor subdivision, minor subdivision, site plan) �-(1L-t ru tvl �Ll Joc4 i t �i D i_�, Hamlet MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File ll Suffolk County Tax Nap rro. �nao - 50 - � - �-I- Sketch plan Preliminary map Street Profiles Grading Plan Preliminary site plan Final Map Other Comments: i 1 ldilA l ��Cl (�P��- �.l�l nbl'1LfY2CRJX� �_1��.�/1 (ll l llil 1 n�- � Q �--k 1.A -------- - � Very truly yours, �AJW�� O/.�-D�l-�1ai.EC.I� 'O BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,CHAIRMAN � , SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD _ f_ • _ . � � • P g�EFO(,(��, D � � T LD � � � S Y � Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 J UL 8 1987 Robert Brown Sidney and Bowne and Son Hauppague, NY 11787 Dear Mr. Brown: Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following: Applic1ation of (N�ajor subdivision, 'nor subdivision site plan) :.�ue �1-��.n�12Z d- SQaN �aca�e.l . . � . Hamlet �,)\�cy - MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File ll Suffolk County Tax Nlap No. /CGb_�j- G- ti/ Sketch plan � Preliminary map Street Profiles - Grading Plan Preliminary site plan Final Map Other c�1tF r ' C mme ts: � � �• il/1 . ry truly yours, otil�al<:�., �,,�,:� BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD _ � ' _ _ __ � , __ _. ' a41w tele<) � � . �15' PR0IECT I.U.NUMBER , �� 11 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAlCONSERVATION - • � _`.},� , DIVISION OF RECUUTORY AFFAIRS . �• T -.. .... _— _ LZ� State Environmental �uallty Revlew \ � SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I ProJect Informatlon(To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) . 1. evo��nntlsponsor $U 2 H a n a u e r & J o a n B a g 1 e y 2, project Name David E . Kapell , as agent same � _ _ J. ProiKt Ixation: � �� -. Municipality $0 U t h O 1 d " co��v $U f f O 1 k � - _ a. Is vr000sed actiore . - QNew ❑ Expansion ❑ Mod'rficatia�altentian ' . 5. Desaibe project briefly� � . . . � Applicant proposes to set-off a building lot of 2-_497 acres from a parcel of 4 .945 acres . 6. Prttise Ixation(road intenections,prominent landmarks,etc.or provide map) � � � �� Southwest corner of Lighthouse Road & Soundview Avenue , Southold , N . Y . 7. Amount of land affected: � Initiallv a q a�+ acres Ultimately 4 9 a 5 acres !. Will proposed action comply with ezistiny zaning or other existing land use restriclionsi � � � Q Yes ❑ No If No,describe briefly � � 9. What is presmt land use in viciniry of projectt � � Residential ❑ Industria� ❑ Cammercial ❑ Agriculture ❑ Parkland�open space ❑ Other .�. Describe: . ' - 10. Does action involve a permiVapO��+l,or fundin�,now or ultimately,from any other governmental aeency(iederol,sbte or local�l � � Ves ❑ No If yes, list agency(s)and permiyapprovals � S. C . D. H. S. Article VI (pending ) 71. Does any aspe<t of the action have a curmntly valid permit or approval7 � ❑ Yes Q No If yes,list aeen<y name and permi�aDProval type 11. As result af proposed action will existing Dermi�approval repuirc modificationt � ❑ Yes � No .._ .__. . --_ . .. ___ 1 CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Sue Hanauer & Joan Bagley �aor�a�u� �ame: _O.a(�y id JCa{�.e-1-L,-_a� a g e n t oa�e: 5/2 3187-_ s�e�.m,�: `�W` . Q If the actfon is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER ' _ _ _ __ _ � �COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ,� 9 RECEN��;;��A� � � ,` � � �ObN �8> �,@' �UU1�1U Michael A. LoGr ppi SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAViD FiARRIS.M.D.,M.P.N. GOMMISSIONER May 29, 1987 David E. Kapell Kapell Real Estates Inc. 10 Flanders Road Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 RE: Hanauer & Begley (T) Southold Dear Mr. Kapell: B�sed upon the information you have submitted, the soil conditions appear to be acceptable for the installation of individual sewage disposal systems on Parcels 1 and 2. In addition, any final maps submitted to the Department should clearly show the high water mark and wetlands of the pond. Since the Zoning Board is no lonqer involved in the SEQRA process, this Department will be coordinating with the Planning Board in relation to the location of the sewage disposal system to any wetlands. If you have any questions concerning this, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, � � c�� --- . . � Royal R. Reynolds, P.E. � � Sr. Public Health Engineer ' Bureau of Wastewater Management RRR:ljr cc: Southold Planning Board COUNTYCENTER . .. 54a-3312 � - � RIVERMEAD.N.V. 11901 . � . � .. _ _ __ . _ _ � _ _ �OUNTY OF SUFFOLK ., REG��v��'gY � � � ;, �w��\�i6�A�D �� " SU�\\1 Michael A. LoGr �PS SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTOF HEALTH SERVICES DAVio HwRR�S,M.D..M.P.H. � . COMMISSIONER May 29, 1987 David E. Kapell Kapell Real Estates Inc. 10 Flanders Road Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 RE: Hanauer & Begley (T) Southold Dear Mr. Kapell: Based upon the information you have submitted, the soil conditions appear to be acceptable for the installation of individual sewage disposal systems on Parcels 1 and 2. In addition, any final maps submitted to the Departrnent should clearly show the high water mark and wetlands of the pond. Since the Zoning Board is no longer involved in the SEQRA process, this Department will be coordinating with the Planning Board in relation to the location of the sewage disposal system to any wetlands. If you have any questions concerning this, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, � ! l., l-`�' Royal R. Reynolds, P.E. Sr. Public Health Engineer Bureau of wastewater Management RRR:ljr cc: Southold Planning Board COUNTY CENTER . 548�3312 RWERMEAD.N.Y.11901 _. � _ _ _ _ � � BOWNE � SOtr SIDNEY B. Sidney B.Bowne,P.E..L.S. ({J__,,,/�„�.�°� Rolantl Andera Rogbr 4 Cocchi (7922-1959) ��•,•�� Frencia J.lYne� cna:ta.c Ke��r. P.e.,�.s. � 45 Manor Road Philip Schlo�zneuar Alexentlre W.MBrCiI, P.E. Joaepn F.Stegman Robert A.Stanton.P.E. SR1ItI1TOWn. N.Y. 1 1787 Paul F.Stevens Robeh W. Brown.L.S. �5�s� 72Q-Qg�� Wiliiem T.Sryne Zabtliel A. Blaekman.P.E., LS. pbnara e.weber George A.Style,P.E. Jerry D.Almonl,P.E. George L.Fagan,Jr.,Ph.D.,P.E. _ Frank Capobienco,QE. T�omas R.Pynchon.L.S. AU9USt 3� 198� Mr. Bennet Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Diane Schultze, Secretary to Planning Board Re: Hanauer & Bagley Minor Subdivision, Southold, N. Y. (SBB N0. 87136) Gentlemen: After review of the above referenced project, we suggest that the Minor Subdivision Plan be revised to include the following: 1. Location of proposed dwelling shall be shown on each lot, a distance of 75 feet must be maintained between the edge of wetland and the proposed structures. Driveways and proposed regrading shall also be shown; 2. The test hole shall be shown on the plan with location and existing elevation; 3. Additional topography shall be shown (200 feet overlap). Elevation of water surface of the pond on the northwesterly side of Sound View Avenue shall be shown along with any pipe or conduit between the ponds. Datum shal l be N. G. V. D. of 1929 and shal l be notd as such on the pl an. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS � !� , ROBE W. ROWN, L. S. ��.��9 RECEIVED BY cc: Ray Jacobs, suPt /Hwys. SOUiHOLD T6WN FWrr�liuG 6G�80 _ A uG o 5 �9�z DATE — - MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW VORK CITV • CLEARWATER An EQu�1 OppoNu^ib EmDloy�r M/FM ��; o��FFo�� , , � � Southold Town Board of A eals o � PP 0t' MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.1., N.Y. 11971 ��'� � �� TELEPHONE (5161 765-1809 AVPEALSBOARD MEMBERS GERARO P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRICONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. � • . ROBEFT J. DOUGLA55 May � 5 . � 98� JOSEPH N. SAWICKI � Abigail A. Wickham , Esq . Wickham , Wickham S Bressler , P . C . Mai � Road , Box 1424 Mattituck , NY 11952 Re : Appeal No . 3214 - Hanauer and Bagley (Variances ) Dear Gail : This letter will confirm our recent conversatio�s in the above matter. Our Town Attorney has advised that Court , Decisions were rendered during 1986 indicating that wetland areas cannot be deleted when calculating the area of lot (s ) in pending or proposed divisions of land . At our Regular Meeting held April 2 , 1987 , the Board � of Appeals reviewed and concurred with the February 19 , 1987 Memorandum of the Building Inspector and Town Attorney' s Opinion that wetland areas cannot be deleted from the area of a lot for proposed set-offs or other divisions of land . Inasmuch as your application is for Variances under Article III , Section 100-31 of the Zoning Code , it would appear that-•r'f your proposal is for a minimum lot area of 80 ,000 sq . ft. and minimum lot width of 175 feet for each proposed lot , for single-family dwelling use and meeting all other zoning requirements , a variance is not required. Please be sure to check with Mr . Lessard of the Building Department as to whether or not in his opinion any other variances or appeal would be necessary under the Town Code . If you feel that you would like to proceed with a variance application with all of the above in mind , please let us know. We are transmitting copies of this letter to the Planning � � i �... : ,-. . - May 15 . 1987 �' � i 2 - Hanauer & Bagley - �� APPealwickham14E59 • � ;� gai 1 A. � � Board and Building Department for their files , as well as the , Suffolk County Health Department for their pending Article VI ' aPP�ication• Unlis�n is toabe�deadfiled ,We Will assume that this variance apPlicat truly , Yours very , GERARD P . GOEHRINGER S CHAIRMAN 4 j�s! #; �. ; lk Enclosure i'}�r �� Building Department ' � Health Department �' � Suffolk County � • t'� f� l j a}{! ' : . 0. t i ', , c� / . . . . .. .. _ .__ . ..... ____ —.__ ___ . .._ . . � .' , (�, 5��+.�'`- --`�` �s�-��.�, r�a i. � i�3� ; - TGL.765-1802 �� % % // � �VFfOl1Y TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -: �J � �� OFFICE OF BUILDINC 1NSPECI'OR .0 P.O. BOX 728 � � '� � � TOWN IiALL ��,y�� O� SOUTFiOLD,N.Y. I 1971 ,c�\ �Ol ,�` �a - Y February 19 , 1987 Tp; Bennett Orlowski, Planninq Board Chairman FROM: Victor Lessard, Executive Administrator\ SUBJECT: Wetland Areas It is my understanding that parcels containing wetlands, sand pits, etc. for purposes of determininq the area of a parcel only, must be included in the ca- culations. The board should take this approach, until such time the State wishes to change its'' laws. . ' ` i,4� �,�1 � �� __ _ ,- _ r � � �u�� c� . � CRftMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES p� ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS �5 July 9, 1991 David Kapell 400 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 Re: Hanauer Bagley Draft EI Scoping Documentation Dear Mr. Kappell: A scoping meeting was held on the above referenced application on Tuesday, July 2, 1991. Attached is a list of those who were present at the meeting. The intent of the meeting was to discuss the scope and content of the Draft EIS for the proposed project. Contained herein is a copy of the Town Positive Declaration, a copy of the Long EAF Part III used as partial basis for the determination, and an oudme prepared by our office as a format and minimum scope of issues to be included in the Draft EIS. These items were discussed during the scoping meeting and the outline contained herein reflects comments discussed. T'his package should be used by a professional environmental consultant as a guide for the issues to be included in the Draft EIS. The Draft EIS will be compazed agamst the attached information and notes from the Scoping Meeting, in order to determine completeness in addressing issues of concern as expressed by the lead agency. Please review this information, and feel free to contact the Town for additional input during the preparation of the document. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very trul�y rs, I� maa'� Charles J. Voorhis cc: Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Valerie Scopaz JUL � 0 f991 ., 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 � , � � � .�Ga�o�,�ls�/h�_%_�_�Z�cc�i_✓__-i`"� _ � �`�G�v�2 a�2c --_...._�__.._ — _ . _ - -- — ----__ - -------- ---- - _--. ._—. — . �iu.��-.` l�llLc�uc�_c�o�/-��,_ T��—��-�a�-�---- - -- - �.� �/�a-��_ C'yr��_ �'l�i7YL�.,_-- . _.--------�-c.��a.st. __-- -s-��.�_°v__�_ "�' - - --= — . __._ G��_ . _� _._��__ _ _ ' r�� --- - - -- --- __ __� _��-e-� - -- _ _---_��-,��,-��'�`��'._ -- --- — �-f`zv_�� Cz --C. ��l �T_��N�. _ /-�1Z ��c��iT _--- ------.��_.,_��z.c� �JC�.,-��.c� _ ` ----�- /�� - - _ .1?� (/ --�G_ -- ------�i�/a�.co� �� — . .— _-- _ - -----------� �� _,�.______ _ - ----��'��-�.Ge�- - - �-��, _ _ __ � _- _ - rf%�'a `Lo`� ��" -- -- --- -- --- � _ _ 1 � • SCOPING OUTLINE HANAUER/BAGLEY DRAFP EIS I. TABLE OF CONTENTS AND SUMMARY A table of contents and a brief summary are required for Draft EIS if it is over ten (10)pages in length. The summary will include: A. Brief description of the action B. Significant,beneficial and adverse impacts, �issues Q controversv must]�g snecifiedl C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternative considered E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals, funding) II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION A. PROJEGT PURPOSE, NEED AND BENEFITS 1. Background and history-prior reviews, ap�rovals, etc 2. Public need for the pro�ect, and municipaliry objectives based on adopted community developments plans 3. Objectives of the pro�ect sponsor 4. Benefits of the proposed action a) social b) economic B. LOCATION 1. Establish geogra�hic boundaries of the project (use of regional and local scale maps is recommended) 2. Description of access to site 3. Descriprion of existing zoning of proposed site C. DESIGN AND LAYOUT (a table of site quantities is recommended) 1. Total site azea a) proposed impervious surface area (roofs, parldng lots, roads) b) amount of land to be cieared- areas of fertilized and non- fertilized vegetation c) open space - areas to remain wooded (specify if proposed for dedication or resuictive covenants) 2. Structures -- conceptual, building envelopes 3. Pazldng-- conceptual a pavement area b number of spaces and layout 4. Water Supply and Sanitary Disposal 5. Stormwater Disposal CRAMER, V OCIATES page 1 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS � � Hanauer/Bagley DraR EIS Scope D. CONSTRUCI'ION AND OPERATION 1. Construction a total construction period anticipated b� schedule of construction c) future potential development, on site or on adjoining properties 2. Operation a) type of operation- landscape and open space maintenance E. APPROVAIS 1. Permit approvals - Planning Board; Zoning Board; Suffolk County, sanitary/water supply; NYSDEC, freshwater wetlands; Town Trustees, other. III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1. Subsurface a) composition and thickness of subsurface material - general stratigraphy 2. Surface - Suffolk County Soil Survey a) List of soil types b) discussion of soil chazacteristics c) distribution of soil types at project site d) suitability for use 3. Topography a) descnption of topography at project site - slopes - prominent or unique features b) description of topography of surrounding areas B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater-from existing literature and test hole information a) location and descnption of aquifers and rechazge azes - depth of water table - seasonal variation - quality _ quanrity flow b) identi5cation of present uses and level of use of groundwater - location of existing wetls - �ublic%rivate water supply - industnal uses - agricultural uses 2. Surface water CRAMER, V OCIATES Page2 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS � .. � � Hanauer/Bagley Draft EIS Scope a) location and description of surface waters tocated on project site or those that may be influenced by the project examples: - depth of pond should be determined - seasonal variation - quantity - classification according to New York State b) identification of uses and levei of use of all surface waters - public/private water supply - agricu�tural uses - recreational c) description of existing drainage azeas,patterns and channels - as mitigation, reducrion of runoff into the pond was discussed as a restorative means of mitigating project impacts. d) discussion of potential for flooding, siltation, erosion and eutrophication of water supply C. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLAGY 1. Vegetation a) list vegetation types on the project site and within the surrounding area b) discussion of site vegetation characteristics - species presence and abundance - a�e - size - distribution - dominance - community types - unique, raze and endangered species - value as habitat for wildlife - productivity 2. Fish, She115sh, and Wildlife a) list of fish, shellfish and wildiife species on the project site and within surrounding area, mcluding migratory and resident species b) discussion of fish, shellfish and wildlife population characteristics species presence and abundance - distribution - dominance - unique, rare and endangered species - productivity 3. Wetlands a) list wetiand areas within or conUguous to the project site b) discuss wetland characteristics - acreage - vegetaUve cover - ctassification - benefits Qf wetland such�flood� r i n control• CRAMER, V OCIATES page3 ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS � � Hanauer/Bagley DraR EIS Scope recreation. wildlife habitat c) discussion of pond vegetation - emergent and submergents species - extent of wetiands, quality of wetlands and vegetation inventory d) discuss wetland regulatory setbacks as per Article 24 and Town Trustees Human Resources A. TRANSPORTATION 1. Transportin� services a) descnption of the size, capacity and condition of services - roads - access�egress from site b) descriphon of cunent level of use of services - source of e�usting traffic B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Fxisting land use and zonin� a) description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area b) description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area 2. Land use plans a) description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and sunounding area C. COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Educational facilities 2. Police protection 3. Fire protection 4. Recreational facilities 5. Utilities 6. Water supply 7. Solid waste disposal D. DEMOGRAPHY i. Population chazacteristics a} discussion of existing population E. CULTURAI.RESOURCES i. Visual resources a) description of the physical chazacter of the community 2. Historic and prehistoric resources a) location and description of historic areas or structures listed on State or National Iteg►'ster or desi�nated by the community, or included on Statewide Inventory b) determine prehistoric site sensitivity due to presence of potable water supply CRAMER, V OCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS PaBe 4 , . � � Hausuer/Bagiey DraR EIS Scope IV. SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Identify those aspects of the environmental setting in Section IV that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action and require discussion. Natural Resonrce A. GEOLOGY 1. Surface -List and discuss constrained soils and limitations 2. Topography- Discuss steep slope areas, drainageways, and potential for erosion B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater - Discuss conformance to County sanitay, surface water and well setbacks. Discuss 150 foot se�azation between well and sanitary for subdivision systems. Discuss vertical pro�le of sanitary system, and limitations due to de�th to groundwater. Ensure compliance with Article 6 SCSD design standazds. 2. Surface water - Discuss conformance to use guidelines as�er NYSDEC. Discuss potential eutrophication. Discuss drainage areas of flood potential. C. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLAGY 1. Vegetation- Quantify type and qnantity of vegetation and habitat changes on site. 2. Fish, Shellfish, and Wildlife -Discuss change is utilization of site by species identified in inventory on a habitat basis. Relate nutrient in�ut and�otential eutrophication to pond wildlife species. Give parriculaz attention to Endangered, Threatened and Species of Special Concern 3. Wetlands - Discuss potential impact on bene£cial values of wetlands. Human Resources A. TRANSPORTATION- Generally discuss ability of roads to accomodate site tr�c. B• LAND USE AND ZOIVING - General discussion of project with zoning and land use plans C. COMMUNTI'Y SERVICES - General discussion on ability of service disticts to service proposed project. D. CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resowces - Discussion of visual resource changes as a result of project. How will�roject be viewed from surroundings 2. Detemune potential impact upon historic and azchaeological resources CRAMER, V OCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 5 _ ., . M • Hanauer/Bagley DraR EIS Scope V. MITIGATION MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Section IV. The following is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major azeas of impact. Natural Resource A. GEOLOGY 1. Subsurface a) use excavated material for land reclamation 2. Surface a) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration and landscaping b) minimize disturbance of non-construction areas c design and implement soil erosion control plan 3. opography a avoid construction on azeas or steep slope b design adequate soil erosion devices to protect areas of steep slope B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a) design system of treatment for stormwater runoff of wastewater pnor to rechazge of groundwater b) maintain permeable azeas on the site 2. Surface water a) ensure use of soil erosion control techniques during construction and operation to auoid siltation - hay bales - temporary restoration of vegetation to disturbed azeas - landscaping b design adequate stormwater control system c� reduce or eliminate existing runoff to pond C. TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation a restrict cleazing to only those azeas necessary b preserve part of site as a natural azea c) after construction, landscape site with naturally occurring vegetation Human Resources A. TRANSPORTATION 1. Transportation a) design adequate and safe access to project site to handle projected traffic flow B. LAND USE AND ZOI�TING 1. Existing land use and zoning a) design project to comply with existing land use plans b) design funchonal and visually appealing facility to set standazd CRAMER, V OCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 6 . � i Hanauer/Bagley Draft EIS Scope and precedent for future sunounding land use C. CULTURAL RESOURCES i. Visualresources a) design exterior of structures to physically blend with existing surroundin�s b) minimize visual impact through thoughtful and innovative design of lighting and si$ns (consider: height, size, intensity,glare, and hours of hghting operation) c) design landscaping to be visually pleasing and to serve as a buffer between sunounding land uses, parking areas, operational equipment and facilities VI. ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECfS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF TEIE PROJECI'IS IMPLEMENTED Identify those adverse environmental effects is Section IV that can be expected to occur regazdless of the mitigation measures considered in Section V. VII.ALTERNATIVES This section contains categories of altematives with examples. Discussion of each altemative should be at a level sufficient to permit a compazative assessment of costs, benefits and environmental risks for each alternative. It is not acceptable to make simple assertions that a pazdcular altemative is or is not feasible. A. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOIAGIES 1. Site layout a location of structures - change front/side yazd setbacks b location of access routes, parking and utihty routes 2. Orientation a compatibility with slope and drainage pattems b site s�ze and set back requirements B. ALTERNATIVES SIZE 1. One dwelling alternative should be analyzed as compared to proposed project C. TRANSFER OF DEVELAPMENT RIGHTS 1. Potential for TDR - Other receiving sites owned by ap licant, availabity of land. TDR to approved four (4) lot subdvision to south was discussed. D. NO ACTION-Acquisition potential, funds, and possible identification of parcel for acquishon 1. Impacts of no action a effect on public need b effect on pnvate developers' need c beneficial or adverse environmental impacts CRAMER, V OCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 7 . � � Hanauer/Ba�ey Dren EfS Scope VIII.IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RE30URCES Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section III that will be consumed, converted or made unavailable for future use. IX. APPENDICES Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the EIS. A. List of underlying studies, reports and information considered and relied on in preparing statement B. Technical e�ehibits (if any) at a legible scale D. Relevant conespondence regarding the projects may be included CRAMER, V OCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS peBe g - _ _ . � � ;r � , ,��- � ; , , � . � .. , �. �� . �, h �Y To�vn HaIL 5309� Main Road ` ' �` + � �,.�✓ �:;.;. P.O. Box 1 179 �''n, •, y Southold. New York 1 1971 " " " ;.:�.=..,' TELEPHONE (516)765•1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 05/23/89 POSITIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law _ State .Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR part 617, Section 617.10 and chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency for this unlisted action described below has determined that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. NAME OF ACTION• ' Sue Hanauer and Joan Bagley SCTM #1000-50-6-4. SEQR STATUS: Type I Unlisted V DESCRIPTION OF ACTION• Applicant proposes to subdivide a 4. 945 acre parcel into 2 lots, 2. 466 acres and 2. 479 acres respectively. This parcel is zoned A-C (Agricultural Conservation) . It is located on Sound View Avenue at Southold. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: The Planning Board has reviewed the Long Environmental Assessment Form, has completed Parts II and III, and has conducted a field Inspection o� the site. Based on the above, the Planning Board has determined that: The proposed action has the potential of having a significant impact to the physical characteristics of the � project site. There may be an effect on the existing freshwater pond and CONTINUED _ � � S wetlands on the site due to the proximity of the proposed construction. The proposed action will involve construction within the required setback from a freshwater body. There may be an effect on the existing freshwater pond and wetlands on the site due to the fact that the proposal includes private wells within 70 feet and individual sewage disposal systems within 100 feet. The upland area of the subject premises does not meet the minimum lot area requirement for two dwellings. CONTACT PERSON Further information can be obtained by contacting Jill M. Thorp, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk County Department of Health services Suffolk county Planning Commission Robert Greene, DEC Commissioner Mohabir Perseud, Department of State Cramer, Voothis & Associates, Inc. James Schondebare, Town Attorney Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Board of Appeals Board of Trustees — _ Applicant Planning Board � � Part III Impact on Land• The proposed action will result in a potential large impact to the physical characteristics of the project site. Construction on proposed lot No. 2 will occur on slopes of 158 or greater. This cannot be mitigated by project change due to the fact that there is already a foundation in place on this lot. There will also be an affect on the existing freshwater pond and wetlands on the site due to the proximity of the proposed construction to these areas. While this cannot be entirely mitigated by project change, it can be minimized by allowing only one dwelling to be constructed, that being the completion of the dwelling on Lot i2. Imnact on Water• The proposed action will have a large impact on the freshwater wetland, particularly since the set back from the wetland line on Lot No. 1 is 59 feet and the setback on Lot No. 2 is only 30 feet. This can be mitigated by project change. The construction also includes private wells within 70 feet of the freshwater wetlands and individual sewage disposal systems within 100 feet. These private wells will produce a draw down effect on the wetlands and the individual sewage disposal systems will introduce additional pollution to the pond. The proposed action will also affect surface and groundwater quality since ,'_t_ requires the use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve the proposed actions. Also, the project will likely cause siltation or other discharge into the existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. This can be mitigated by a project change limiting constcuction to one dwelling only and mitigation measures during construction. The proposed action will alter surface water runoff by creating more impervious surfaces and elimination of existing vegetation. Jyy� SZEP/�TOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. �' ENVIRORMENUIENGWEER56�ANDUSEPUNNERS � . _ _ _ . . . . � � ,I�npact on Plants and Animals: The proposed action could affect non-threatened or non-endangered species in that it may interfere with resident or migratory wildlife species, particularly in that the freshwater pond is most likely used as a source of drinking water. the pond is also a habitat to a variety of local water species such as ducks, geese, and swans. Impact on Aesthetic Resources: The proposed action will affect aesthetic resources since the uses are in sharp contrast to the surrounding natural resources. The proposed land use will also be visual to users of aesthetic resources and will eliminate their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of those resources, as well as eliminate the scenic view of the pond which are important to the area. Imnact on Open Space and Recreation: The proposed action will result in the permanent closure of a future recreational opportunity which is the use of the pond as an area for bird watching and ice skating. This proposal will also cause a major reduction and ultimate elimination of an open space important to the community. __ _ Imoact on Growth and Charac pr o Co munity or Ne�ghborhood: This proposed action will set an important precedent for future projects, particularly in areas with natural resources such as those present on this site. This action would be a divergence from the local goals and policies of the Town which include preservation of the wetland areas, and natural resources important to the community. The subject premises contains an upland area barely sufficient for one dwelling. It does not meet the minimum lot area requirement for two dwellings. Therefore a subdivision into two conforming lots cannot be accomplished on this parcel. • .Y1I SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. C� A' ENV�RONMENTALENGINEER56LANDUSEPLANNERS �'�� . _ _ _ . . , � � From a review of the environmental factors present on this parcel a two lot subdivision would create a severe adverse impact on the pond and its environs. Reduction to one lot only using the existing foundation and using proposed location of well, septic system, and driveway on "Lot 2", with no clearing within 50 feet of the pond (except where it exists now) , and no fertilized vegetation, including lawn, on the property except for native indigenous species fertilized with slow-release organic fertilizers, all taken together would mitigate environmental impacts to the greatest degree practicable. The best mitigation measure is the acquisition of this parcel for use as a Town skating area since that has been the historic use of the site. The existing foundation could then be utilized for an accessory building to the skating area. �71ry� SZEPATOWSKI i1550CIATES INC. C� if' ENVIRONMENTALENGINEER58LANDUSEPLANNERS �^"1 _ . . .. . _ _ _.. . . .. _ . . . .. . _. . 1 � , � ♦ h � � `` . P �� Su�C.+E- , REILLY, LIKE & TENETY A7TORNEYS AT IAW ?AO WEST MAIN STREET IRVINO LIKE P.O.BtlX 218 � . ': � . . . � . sExNwRD r.nE�L1.Y gpgy�,pN,NEW YORK 11702 VINCEIYI'G'IPNL+fY (5t6)669-3000 FAJC(516)669-1122 .;;J'.� i � � . °F� June 10, 1991 IOSEPH H.MeSPEDON � Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman 2oning Board of Appeals Tcwn of uuut.o�d 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application for Variance � Hanauer & Bagley - 1000-50-6-4 ( M�Na� su�6� � Dear Mr. Goehringer: As requested in your letter of May 22, 1991, enclosed is a copy of a survey of our client's property showing the Suffolk County Department of Health Services' (SCDHS) stamp of approval of construction of the proposed house shown thereon. Please note Exhibit "J" of the Appeal, whioh is a letter dated May 29, 1987, in which the SCDHS concluded that the soil conditions on the subject property appear to be acceptable for the installation of individual sewage disposal systems on parcels 1 and 2 . These are the minor subdivision lots. Very truly yours, L LIKE, TENETY & AMBROSINO IL:ch IR NG Encls cc: Mr. Sanford Hanauer , . �► - ! POND •� _ _.--�---�•�� __. � � \ �` "� _^ — ) ti�'� �i ��sOUND � ' .�,so.� VIEW 1��,�� AVENUE �I�491 i^' ��.si.� . �s,... �, ( / ii / \� ^--'___—__� ..,r• �. . � N�J°3i3 ��E. i��----- - ------ 4,- ------ --. �. �n r .f .s � � 476 �� \ � / / 1 1 ' � �/ � � � � } / � � � � � / NOTE� 11PPADVAL SOBIECT 1'O SRTElt SUPPLY '� 1 �„�. ., i i ; �, ccraos�eu� r+rru srnra»ms. xcsr � j r � Y= , / � .,` � % / wer.r. nroicaras rssrzcrDe coemn�rammzox. � � �� _ � / � // / � . I j.. ' N ` �� + I I � �� . � o I � [ s •''o�• /� / � I I � p� � �� £ : i % 1 � � m Z �,$ , � �� / - I I � S �,. ,. /� ,( I � � i O`\ � / � � � i � m ` 1 I � � � . i \ POND i i � � ' �\ \\ ; I � � \ � � 1 �i '� 1 1 � \ \ � ��—� R � \ I � 1 1 � , � � \\ \� � . � `\ ; � � � . � \ HEW WELL '- .. � ` ` I I � � ! \�. 1 \ 1 1 . � � � � \ ' \ \ �q� `� I � . / / \\ �\ ` � v ' I `m ! ��' � p � / . � \ i/ �'� \\L`\;• - 'Y. _ . � � /' �o� g. / � �i � � . . t � � � ,�,�. � � i�v°°osso Y 'w�p�a�^ y . � / / �OGMp✓gL Mo��K fl�l0. D / / OF b' ' ; � �� // qg5.94 a . / / ��T NOL6 L[Wl9NIPLWM O ��OwNO��V[LL � / � 7YIOf10QR � A�O�LMD A �V 5 ,W �� 5.46° g�� cGuiB 1 � �ah� A. M r�rau�o noW o� formerry ,r.cca�ve� l . 1 iso :� ' SURVEY FOR SUE HANAUER B JOAN 6AGLEY • WFFOLK COUNtY DE►ARIMENT O� Hl�liM StRVICEs AT SOUTHOLD MSil:l2, 1980.� D�TE FE0.28�1l83 � FOA �oPROVAI OF CONSTRUCiION ONLY �OwN OF $OUiHOLD .: ' SC4E• I�.gO' . . C Ci g s f 0}L SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW 1'ORK MO. �b•�g �[ MS REF.NO._-�--------� •�urwai[[s 4rtiuno�o��opr�e+ m n�q �utF v �` `7 i��v[.��rieuriew v�[erio� rto�a*wt � . r.o.K f nrt ewuna u� pr u. ^ , _ •CM�O v M�1]Y�V(I Mpt K.1�q iNL��NO �.��' 24 �V��[�OK! WRCO �[LL 011 LM�O!!LP MI�1MLLL ' S1 � A�PR�� Ql�[COYl�O[MO t0�(��1t10 /�V�<0�� p ��p W ' �7. hEµtMOEwpIMENf•G�i�f1M��vYNtl� WIWSIN�Cf __ "'K."'� '• ' . .•'•s`: ��0} rf �l�u�! T i�[I�r�t(O�INx..�MUw- •K�qfT YI� afOWi �Mqb rt{ � tt� Mfwtq �cf/K �`Dl[xOwt 1TUut�MUf�<0 * '� �� 1�� yM �1� �y� •t/�C>�Y YN M��^oo�(CliOY.mY�FOt��S LOi yQy wp[O�.�xo�O n�l�H��nita oi Iw[�t�OiwP t •TKIt YL Iq A(LIpM� �II�W� w�nn w rM�r�er[�rr M�ilf�f�p�. Wy��h�(�1 �wL Mf �yhuL��Ri �. OiMM MY}M01( tMO�Y MA��. 0��DOis M�l I�tTItY IOIp 011 N�KYV(M� ' � •�Mlrf(AfWIl1Y0��1y�bfqKf��1fY�0I11Mi�A0�0[Y4 ' I � VIu�d1�OM1 1p 1N(�t�MOI}O�O/TIKlM/f1.1 COVIIIY CLIIIITMCYi •OI�t��G[1 fMbl�l M(IKWI (Ilql N1NLI11�4Mlt � q 11tlLTM�ONIC[�. IJP��M� /111oCNs[/ Y�Iql �fKtl/IC Q 689� MNCYIf. —_ IWIOSt ��0 ��[ MOT TO�[Yf[0 W(�l�KItM + uY�w �MK11(I 4M[{OR 1011 dl[�LCTI011 p/tNCH � (�� . ' m(n - -- ----"` YOUNG � YOUNG ��.'�w"o�'E NOTE�1�•MpNYMENT ' ,:, � � 'i �+ 2.CONTOUR LINE SMOWN TNUS� —90-- �LOCM W.YDUNC�PROFESS�ONA� CNGINEER _ � '�,,1, ; ' i�� 3.T07ALAqE►•4.963ACRE3 �MOUwDStINVErpxM.Y.AUCtNSEN0.128�3 �� -_ '_!( ;'�,: NOWARO W.'�M1N6. lAMO SYRVf YOR � ,�I ' i •MIKY�OMOIRI(�Nf(RKiNIt(�17�C[�Y00.lplF�PdMn[0� MY.S.UCENSEMO.ISl9! JUly � i� rc nar n[u oniMrwYf wo w e�u enrYn r�ar ar�u� ' 1 ' . � . . . .__ _._ . . ....._ __. ' �__.. .. � . . � � . �. � _- - ZONING SOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x Appeal of SUE HANAUER and JOAN BAGLEY, Appellants, From the Buildinq Inspector's "Notice of Disapproval for Building Permit", dated December 5, 1990. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x NATORB OF APPR�7• 1. The Appellants, SUE HANAUER, residing at Woodbury, New York, and JOAN BAGLEY, residing at Woodbury, New York, who are the owners of the premises hereafter described, hereby appeal for an area variance to the Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") of the Town of Southold from the Building Inspector's °Notice of Disapproval for Building Permit" , dated December 5, 1990 (Exhibit "A") , whereby the Building Inspector denied to Appellants a building permit to construct for residential use a dwelling on Lot ,�1, southwest corner of Soundview Avenue and Lighthouse Road, Southold, NY, Suffolk County Tax Map Section 1000, Slock 6, Lot 4 , Filed Map No. 87-2025, Lot 1 and 2, pursuant to an application for a building permit, dated November ' 26, 1990 (Exhibit "B") . The variance requested would allow a lot area for parcels 1 and 2 as shown on the two lot Minor Subdivision Plan referred in paragraph 2 below to have less than 80,000 square feet of upland area per lot as required by , � ! � ♦ Southold Town Code Article III, §§100-31 (A) and 100-32 and Article XXIII, $100-239. 2. The premises which are the subject of this appeal are approximately five (5) acres in size and are shown on the 2 lot Minor Subdivision Plan prepared by Younq & Young dated December 23, 1987 and revised July 25, 1988, August 2, 1988 and November 22, 1988 (Exhibit "C") . 3 . This appeal to the ZBA is necessary because the Building Inspector issued the Notice of Disapproval as a consequence of the Southold Planning Board's statement e3cpressed in its letters of July 3, 1989 (Exhibit "D") and November 21, 1990 (Exhibit "E") , that it cannot proceed with the application because of its position that: A. Appellant may, upon receipt of a disapproval from the Building Department, proceed with an application before the ZBA for any area variance, and B. The Planning Board will withhold the reschedulinq of the [SEQRA] scoping session, until notification that the ZBA has made a determination on the appeal. 4. On December 2, 1982, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ('�NYSDEC") issued a letter to the former owner of the premises (Exhibit "F") stating that the subject premises were less than 12.4 acres in size and had not - 2 - . . � ! � � _ . � been designated by the State as having unusual local importance and, therefore, no permit under Article 24 (Freshwater Wetlands) of the Environmental Conservation Law was required. 5. On December 8, 1983 , appellants made an application to the Planning Board for a Minor Subdivision of two lots. 6. Appellants ' attorneys, Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, Esqs. , by letter dated December 8, 1983 to the Building Inspector (Exhibit "G") , informed him that, because there were less than two acres of upland for each lot, the Planning Board was required to deny sketch plan approval based upon the two acre zoning ordinance, and informed the Building Inspector that appellants intended to apply to the Board of Appeals for a variance, and requested that the Building ��inspector send a Notice of Disapproval. The appellants then applied to the ZBA for variances under Article III, §100-31 of the zoning code. 7. Thereafter, the Town of Southold adopted Local Law 6-1984, requiring a permit to conduct activities on wetlands (Southold Code §97-20Aj , and before a new building could be constructed on an area adjacent to a freshwater wetland, permissian was required from the Southold Board of Town Trustees. 8. On July 18, 1985, the Southold Trustees adopted a resolution granting appellants permission under the provisions of the Southold wetland ordinance to construct a dwelling on the - 3 - � �, � � premises, which permission was extended through July 23 , 1987. The foundation for that dwelling was later located on that portion of the premises shown as Lot 2 on the Minor Subdivision Plan. 9. Appellants undertook to determine whether the lots covered by the Minor Subdivision Plan contained sufficient area to permit appellants to construct a second dwelling on the premises in compliance with the requirements of the zoning ordinance. 10. On February 19, 1987 , Victor Lessard, Executive Administrator of the Building Department, sent to Bennett Orlowski, the Planning Board Chairman, a memorandum (Exhibit "H") in which he stated: It is my understanding that parcels � containing wetlands, sand pits, etc. for purposes of determining the area of a parcel only, must be included in the calculations. The board should take this approach, until such time the State wishes to change its' (sic) laws. 11. On May 15, 1987, the Chairman of the ZBA sent a letter dated May 15, 1987 to appellants' attorneys, Wickham, Wickham & Bressler, Esqs. (Exhibit "I") , stating in part: This letter will confirm our recent conversations in the above matter. our Town Attorney has advised that Court Decisions were rendered during 1985 indicating that wetland areas cannot be deleted when calculating the area of lot(s) in pending or proposed divisions of land. • - 4 - , � � � . _ At our Regular Meetinq held April 2, 1987, the Board of Appeals reviawed and concurred with tha February 19, 1987 Memorandum of the Building Inspector and town Attorney's Opinion that wetland areas cannot be deleted from the area of a lot for proposed set- offs or other divisions of land. As a consequence of this letter, the appellants ' variance application was deadfiled. 12. The appellants also proceeded with an application to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (��SCDHS") for approval of the installation of sewage disposal systems on parcels 1 and 2 of the Minor Subdivision map. 13 . On May 29, 1987, the SCDHS issued a letter to appellants' agent, David Kapell (Exhibit �tid��) , stating that the soil conditions on the subject premises appeared to be acceptable for the installation of individual sewage disposal systems on parcels 1 and 2, and further stated: Since the Zoning Board is no longer involved in the SEQRA process, this Department will be coordinating with the Planning Board in relation to the location of the sewage disposal system to any wetlands. 14. On July 1, 1987, the Building Inspector issued a building permit to construct one house on the premises described therein (Exhibit "K") , to be located on that portion of the premises which is shown as Lot 2 on the Minor Subdivision map. - 5 - ' � � � . . 15. On or about July, 1987, a foundation was installed pursuant to such permit. 16. On August 24, 1987, the Southold Town Planning Board received from appellants an Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) in connection with appellants ' prior Minor Subdivision proposal to divide the premises into two residential building lots. 17. The Planning Board engaged Sidney B. Bowne & Son, consulting engineers, to review the project and appellants ' initial EAF. 18. On October 30, 1987, Sidney B. Bowne sent a letter requesting additional information and a revised EAF. 19. In response to Sidney B. Bowne's comments, appellants engaged En-Consultants and filed a new Long Environmental Assessment Form ("LEAF") dated January 13 , 1988, which specifically addressed those comments. Unfortunately, Sidney B. Bowne proceeded to re-review the initial August 24, 1987 EAF, instead of reviewing the En-Consultants' January 13 , 1988 LEAF, thereby causing several months delay. 20. Further delay ensued as the result of the Planning Board engaging Szepatowski Associates as new consultants to review the project, and the En-Consultants' LEAF. The Town's second consultant took three or four months to review En-Consultants' submission. - 6 - __ . � ' � . Upon completion of that review, the Town's consultant requested a survey of the project's potential impact on endangered wildlife species. . This necessitated appellants' contractinq with Hampton Manor Associates to conduct such survey at considerable expense. The survey was completed and submitted to the Planning Board. 21. On or about January 10, 1989, while the SEQR process on appellants ' Minor Subdivision proposal was pending, the Town adopted supplementary regulations by Local Law 1-1989, prohibiting the inclusion of land under water in computing development density (Zoning Ordinance §100-239) . 22 . On March 4, 1989 and March 29; 1989, appellants ' agent, David E. Kappell, wrote letters inquiring of the Planning Board as to its extraordinarily protected review of the items submitted in connection with the Minor Subdivision project, and requested that it expedite its procedures so as to bring the project to fruition. 23 . On April 13 , 1989, Szepatowki Associates, Inc. submitted to the Planning Board completed LEAFs Parts II and III for the Minor Subdivision Plan, and recommended a negative SEQR declaration conditioned, in part, that the Minor Subdivision be reduced to one lot only, using the existing foundation, and undertaking certain mitigation measures. - 7 - _ � � � • 24. On May 22 , 1989, the Planning Board informed appellants' agent, David E. Kapell, of its adoption on May 15, 1989, of a resolution that it make a positive SEQR declaration. As a reason in support of its SEQR determination, the Planning Board stated that: The upland area of the subject premises does meet the minimum lot area requirement for two dwellings. PRACPICAL DIFFICULTIES 25. Appellants registered their objection with the Planning Board to its determination. 26. Applicants had proceeded in good faith with the Minor Subdivision project in reliance upon the opinions of the Building Inspector, Town Attorney and ZBA that the portion of the premises which was under water could be counted in determining the density of development under the A-C zoning and, therefore, appellants were entitled to build on each of the two lots of the Minor Subdivision Plan. 27. In further reliance, the appellants had built a foundation on lot 2 , and expended substantial sums for engineering, contractors, agents, environmental consultants and attorneys fees in furtherance of the project. 28 . Were it not for the protracted Planning Board SEQRA review of the Minor Subdivision application, appellants would - 8 - . �► �- � � � . have received its approval of two building lots, and obtained from the Buildinq Inspector a building permit to construct a second residential dwelling on lot 1 of the Minor Subdivision, before the chanqe in the zoning ordinance on January 10, 1989 which prohibited the inclusion of land under water in calculating density. 29. The Planning Board reviewed appellants ' concerns at its meeting on June 12, 1989, and then issued its letter of July 3, 1989 (Exhibit "L") which informed appellants that, upon receipt of a disapproval from the Building Department, they could proceed with an application before the ZBA for an area variance. The Planning Board further stated that it would withhold the re-scheduling of its scoping session (SEQR) until notification that the ZBA had made a determination on the application 30. On November, 1990, appellants' counsel and representatives met with the Planning Board and requested it reconsider the position taken in its letter of July 3, 1989. 31. The ZBA, however, adhered to its position as evidenced by its letter dated November 21, 1990, (Exhibit "M") . 32. The Planning Board informed appellants that it lacks the power to giva appellants the equitable relief they seek 33. Accordingly,� appellants have followed the procedure outlined in the Planning Board's letter of November 21, 1990, - 9 - _ . _ . �- � � M � and have obtained the Building Inspactor's Notice of Disapproval for Building Permit, necessary to the initiation of the instant appeal to the ZBA for an area variance. 34. Sased on the foregoing, it is clear that there are practical diffsculties present here which justify the ZBA in granting the requested area variance. FINANCIAL HARDSffiP 35. Appellants have incurred many thousands of dollars in fees and expenses for their own and the Planning Board's engineers and consultants in connection with the Planning Board's protracted SEQRA processing of the Minor Subdivision Plan. 36. In addition, the Planning Board's refusal to approve appallants' Minor Subdivision Plan for the reasons stated in its letter of November 21, 1990 has caused the loss of a major part of the value of appellants' property in that it has deprived applicants of all beneficial use of one of the two building lots of the Minor Subdivision Plan. 37. Appellants have engaged Andrew D. Stype, C.A.R. , a firm of appraisers, to estimate the economic injury to appellants caused by the loss of one buildinq lot. 38. The appraisal report of Andrew D. Stype, C.A.R. , - 10 - . � � � �► dated October 22, 1990, a copy of which will be introduced in evidence at the ZBA hearing on this appeal, establishes that appellants ' damages are one Hundred Thirty Thousand ($130, 000.00) Dollars, an amount whose magnitude is sufficient to justify characterization of the Planning Board's action as a confiscatory taking of appellants' property. 39. According the grant by the ZBA of the requested variance is necessary to assure that appellants' due process rights are not violated. ECOIAGICAI, Il�ACP OF MINOR SIIBDIVISION 40. The Suffolk County Department �of Health Services has concluded that soil conditions on the Minor Subdivision Plan are satisfactory for the installation of individual sewage disposal systems on each of the 2 lots of the Minor Subdivision Plan (Exhibit "J ") . 41. The affidavit of ecologist Ken Coenen, dated March 21, 1991 (Exhibit "N") and the full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) appended thereto as Exhibit "O" , establishes that a residential dwelling can be constructed on Lot no. 2 of the Minor Subdivision Plan without unacceptable adverse environmental impact to �the subject premises or to surrounding properties, and in a manner compatible with the principles governing ZBA qrants of area variances. - il - , � r � � 42. In view of the significant economic injury inflicted � upon appellants by disapproval of a buildinq permit for a second dwelling, and the absence of adverse health or environmental impacts to the subject premises or surrounding properties that would result from the grant of such building permit, appellants are also entitled to an area variance on the ground of financial hardship. 43. For all the reasons and grounds stated, appellants respectfully request the ZBA to grant an area variance permittinq the appellants to obtain a building permit to construct a residential dwelling on Lot 1 of the Minor Subdivision Plan as described in Paragraph 1, supra. Dated: Babylon, New York REILLY, LIKE & TENETY � April 25, 1991 Attorneys for Appellants Office and P.O. Address 200 West Main Street P.O. Sox 218 Babylon, NY 11702 (516) 669-3000 - 12 - . ,- . � V � fOPMNp.1 � . Totivrv or soilTTro�.� BUILDING DL•PARTIIL•'NT . TO�VN CLLRK'S OPPICL SOUTIIOLD,N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Datc . . . .December .5� . . . . . . . . . . ., 19 9� . . TO , Sue Hanauer 6 Joan Bagley 130 Woodbury Road . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noodbury, N.Y. ] 1797 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noveiober 26 90 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . ., 1� . . . . . forpermitto . , Construct a second residence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . at Location of Proper[y . , _ ,�5160 Soundview Ave: 6 2205 Lighthouse Rd. Southold, N.Y. HouseNo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Strcet Ham/et County Tax Map No. I000 Scction . . . . 50. . . . . . . . Block . , . .6, , 4 . . . . . . . Lot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Subdivision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Filed Map No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lot No. . . . . . . , is retumed }terewith and disapproved on the followin�orounds . . . . , , ,Under Article III . . . . . . . . . . . Section 100-31 A �I) only 1 (one) one family dvelling permitted on each lot. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amend disapproval.of Dec. 5, 1990 to include folloving: The area of parcels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 and 2 contains less than 80,000 square feet of upland area as required by . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Article %%III, Section ]00-239 and Article III, Section 100-32. Action � required by.the_ Zoning.Board.o£ Appeals: • . . • . . • • • . - • • - • • - . • • . . . . . • . . . . • . ' . Action.also. required by N.Y. State Department of Environnental Conservation � and Board of Tovn Trustees. • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • � � � . ./;- ;7 , �,' ,. _�I'i:� - ' . . . . i c'�ni<-G. "'—_':�:�l1 �Iluilaing Inspector � � � ' " , � ,� RV 1/80 _ _ - - - -_ _. _ . . - - - ,:, , • � • � �✓ 80AR0 OF HEAI.l'F1 . . . . . . . . - FORhiN0. 1 1 SETS OF PL,1N$ „ , � ' SURVEY . . . . . . . � � � � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CI�CCK � � � � � � � � � - EiU1LDING DFPARTMENT � � � � � � � � " " ' • SEPTIC FORl1 . . . . . . . . , , 70WN HALL ' ' • • $OUTiip�.(LLY_ i1771 t:OiIFY � TEl•: 7G5�1II02 CALL . Ex�mincJ . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. !9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P1nIL T0 : Approved . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 19 . . . P . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. cnnit No. . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • Disapprovcd a/c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •(Building Inspcctor) . . . . . • . , �1PPlICATION FOR 8Ul1.D11VG PERNIIT , • Dace .Noye�lb6C.��1.. . .. t; . INSTRUCTIONS a. Tlus applicasion musi be completcly Cticd in by typewriter or in ink and submittcd to the Building InsRectot,�»� scts of pLuu,�rcutatc plot plan to scnle. Fee acmRt�n� to schedule. b• PbI pl.Vf showin5 loc�tion of lot and oC buildin;s on premises, rctationship to adjoinin; premises or publie sti or areas, and ;ivin� � detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the di�;ram which is p�n o(��s �, cation. , ' e. The �vork covered by this app�ication may not be commenced beCorc issuance of Buildin� �d. Upon approval of tliis application, the Buiidin; Inspactor will issucd a Buildino Permit to he applicattt, Such pe� shat! be kept on the premises av�ilobte for inspection throu�hout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whoie or in part for any purpose whatever untii a Certificate of Occup� sh�ll have been granted by the Buildine Inspector. APPLICATION IS HERE$Y MADE to the IIuildin; Department for the issuance of a Building Permit ptusuartc to 3uilding Zone Ordinance of the Towa of South�id, Sulfolk County, New York, and other applicabie Latvs, Ordin�nce te;ulations, !or the eonstruction of buildings, additions or alteracions, or for removal or demolition, as herein descrit �>>� �PpNcant a;rces tn eomp�y with all app�ic�5;� laws, ordinances, building code, housinG code, and re;u1�[ions, and dmit authocized inspectors on premises and in buildin� for necessary inspections. ' • � � �(Signature�oi applieant, or name, if a eorpor�tionj� . . 130 .Woodb;qry;Ro,�d;, WQQdOur.r...N..v.� ,t». . (hiailing address of applicuit) tate �vhether applicant is o�vner, lessee, agent, architect, engincer, oeneral contr�ctor, tlectrician, plumber or build� . . ..... ... . . . . . . . . .9e�nt . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . �meofownerofpremises . ,$u8„FJdOALe,r, • • • . • •• • • ••� �� .ao�. .lvan. .8a9ley. .(Gem.ini) , , , , , , (asonthetaxrollorlatestdeed) � � � � � � �� " " ' �PP��nt is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer. . . .... . . .. . . + , . (1�'ame and tille of corporate oCGccr)� � � � � � � � � ' • • f3uildcr's Liccnsc �(o. .. . . . ........ . . .. . . . . . . . . ' Plurnber's Liccnsc No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Elcctrici�n's Liccnsc No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' OlhcrTradc'sLiccnscNo, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ; , , , , , , Location of lanJ on wl�ich proposeJ work will bc dor.c; • Lot, p1 ; . Southwest corner of Sqynd,v,i,�y�, A„�n�€, & ,4ighthouse, Road; Southotd . . . . . Ilousc Numbcr Strcct • • • . . . . . . .. . .. .. . • Hamlet ' • •• • • • County 7'�� Na, (000 S¢ction , , 100Q, , , . . . . . . . : Bluck5,4 .�1ock 6 .. Lot . . SubJivision S.4? .HP!�.a4gC'. b. 1odn. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.... . .. . . . ,` , .. . . • .Hdgl e.y. . . . . . . . F.ilcd A[ap No. .$�:�Q?� . . . i�2tc csistin� usc and occup�ncy o,f prcmiscs and intcnJcd usc �nJ occu • • Lot .�. .�{.2. - . . .... , s �'��Y of proposed eonstruction: A. kxisting usc end occupancy. . . . . ... . • B. Intended use and occupancy. . . . . .T,WO:story. r.esiden • •• • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •• ••• •. • ••• •••• � ce . on .�ot. �:t .. . . . . . ..... . . . . .. .. . a P R — 3 — 4 1 W E D 1 0 : 0 S , H A N H U E R A S S O C .� r . � 1 . ,T �" � . � � ' � . ' . N�turc of�vork (check ��hich appticable): Nc�v puilJing X. . . . . . . . . AJditicn . . . . . . . . . . �Utcnlio� . . . . . . . . . Rcpzit . . . . . . . RFmov�l . . . . . . . . Dcmolition . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Swi:nnin� pool. . . . . . . . . . Tennis�Court� . . . . . . . . . Accessory 6uilding. . . . . . . . . . Fence . . . . . . .0[her Work: . . . . . . . . . • Estimatcd Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (tn �c paid on filing this aDDlic�tion� IC dwcllin„aumbcr of d�vcllin; units . . . . . . . . �. . . . . . Numbcr o!dwclling units on cach floor . �. . . .: . . . . . . . . ICearocc. num bcrolcars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . If busincst,commcrci�l or mi�cJ occupancy, spccify naturc and cxtcnt of cach typc of usc . . . . • • • . . .. . . . . . . . . . Dimcnsions of c�cistine structutcs, if any: Pront . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rcar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dcpth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H�i:lit . . . . . . . . . . . . Num bcrofStoncs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . Dimcnsions of samc st�vcturc witt� altcrations or�Jditions: Front . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R�� • • • • - • • •• • • • • • • • • pcpth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ticight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nuinbcr of Storics . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . Dimcnsions of cntirc ncw constn�ction: f•'ront . 3A. . . .2. . . . . . . Rcar . . . . 2 Q . . . . . . . . Dcpth . . . .�lQ. . . . . . . . Hcigl�t . . . 24. . . . . . . . Numbcr oi Slorics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Sizc of lot: Fiont . . . . . .ZZS. . . . . . . . . . , . P.car .163...94 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dcpth. . �J��`.•04. . . . . . . . . . . DatcofPutchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Namc o[ �ormcr O�vncr . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • ••• • • Zone or use district in wliicli premises are situated . . . . . . AC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • �¢� Docs ro osed Constroction viotatc an zonin law, ordinancc or rc�ulation: " .�p�" •�'*'`'`�`�``�`?' • P P Y S � �� . ' . 14J1 lot bm reoraded . . . . . . NA . � .1Yill excess fill be removecl from.premises. Y�= � NameoCOwnerofprcmises .SJ��.y$Dauer(Joanpdcircu1�0 Woqdbt{ry Rd., PlioncNo515:Ii92:.44.Q4 . Na+neoCArchitcct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .BdqleypddressWOA.dbUCY.�. .N.Y.. . .PhoneNo. . . . • . . . . . . N�+ne oCConiractor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. : . . . . . .Address . . .. . . . . . .. . . Phone No. . . .. . • .Is this propecty located vithin�;pp feet of� a tidal �vetlaad? *y�s• • • •t�0� . *If ye3 , Sou[hold Towo Trus[ees Pcrmit may be required. PLOT DIAGRA�i Loe�te eleatly and distinctly all buildings, whcthcr existing or proposcd, and.indicatc all set-back dime.^.::o�: t: ,perty Unes.Give street and block numbcz or dcscription according to deed, and show street names and indicatc ��::_::. erior or corner IoG See attached survey •, � , � - • TATG OF �E�V YORK, S.S OUNTY OF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ,,, , , , . . . .580 foxd .tlanAue C'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . bcine dt�:y s�vam, dcposcs and says thot he is the appli:�. . , �(N�me of individual sianins contract) . bove namcd. . �c ;stl�c . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Agent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . : .. . .. .. .. . . . .. . .. . . ' •(Convactor,agenc, corpontc offiecr, ctc.) • C said o�vnct or owncrs, and is duly authorized to perform or havc perCormed thc said work and lo mal:c and Glc U rr��uon; that all statcmcnu containcJ in this application uc Iruc to thc bcst of liis knowlcJgc and bclicf;�nJ that t 'ork �vill bc perl'omicd in U�c mar+ner sct forth in thc applic�tion filcd tlicrc�vitl�. wom to bciotc mc Uiis � • „ . , 26th, „d�ya�, , , , , , ,November �� 90 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. /� J �otary Public, . . .��.Lr4... .��h3� County . • , �� N�as«tu�Ca� ' � . . . . . . '. . .��. . . . . . . W�a March 4,�Z (Si;n�ture of applicy _ _. _ I-. . . � � i � � , . i � � � a I . I � • � 4 ' �°� .- - ---_=_-__ ` ,,' '• �— , , �� I '� � 1 � . , ?_ � i �, i ,,'° / � ''<;',�-' � ' c 4 �, \ ; �` � �ky".a,�"�`!� �•e . ,, m,�y�o r \ �`• '\ /. �a,�+�v ��ti � a, G�'r`. .; \ \�_ ��r �� y `�� •�� .i' N � \ � i•� e�n . ... � �d. `` \ �fcua:�f.wC \ �V ``♦ � 1 I w � ��O�w `� \6•, `�t s� ` a`��`�� • '¢09 \I \� _�'�' ` , , et � ,,•, `,' 1` � pO `� ` � � � '�o O; � � �i� 1 P 1 \ i �A � I s` \ 1 1 )1 ,,\ � ` � iC.�=v'�'I�} `�!3',JI �1 �` 1111 � Y �,` �� 1 , 3'h� 9 J `. , • � �, � `` � � � • .�/ o g .� ��.',� •y) s' �. ,� �J� i � � , A1+ar \\ �� '"iF�1'��'1 �A ,,. '�p �,� , � ,a;o' \ � � � � �� •�t�'�a "� ; "`� ' `� \� �/ ��°3,; a�`J�S'T , b A: tv � � •p_ I, `�Jd ; �'� �� I �\ • . r• �,��" �� ,%/ Fd' \ ��/ . � ` �^.i � � \ 'M1 1 +' `� � e�� / \�_..� . -. .,/ \ -'� '� � ��i�kn�r wms�+m,i. � � �o °•a ty� � � ~ \�� :i P �� 1 � P ' �'G`� `-�•—' — ^\ . � � �4`� � p' nn xeu�-� tor ro�e rx ` oyy, � �� . / \ u _ _y �� f. � 1` ��d 11�M � � � �• 47 '�J �1. t� O � bi[� �� „i o4' '4,, �� ;1..sr:� � � i�.wnr[xr a.urx K I ---1�/ 1.�YIPol11 WMT�TY WI � �. -pR 1p00 HCT.G,��l�\Ipt� � Z' . . . � . . .. . . . ].IYTk M[� ��.M!1PG � . •.iLL'��}�Yfll[RY1nIhMW. IWl�H1 .... •n�r+wr�sw n.w�.�r mnwn rwx � —a—� � . _.._ . nun--x--u`nr�nue wxi� .. •m�ww aew riws.--w--.M nar �te nw (/� 'I(MYMC W�.�WIYII\O�I��MOYONI ,j \ . . .•� _ V � I_L/ M MIIOR iM�Y AR M N49 FI16 M'IIT(11�YN�IYO f�Y[OMIL I�S111N Ipl Yl IOT�IY�N�p[Y[IpYLMT/ . LIVLY�ITXMRYWi�Y�11fYOlI�1�pTILY1R�UpM�pfMIpIOM[4TM. � a...... .�.a-- x � IOMp Y, 1f.lA�IC.p�Nq . . .. MINOR SUBDIVISqN PIAN fOR fUE IUNAUEII 0 JO�N BdBLEY �pv n,nr � �w ;,xr awi x .hr � � �T 6M110.D e�rt e[c.u.M1 rrwae� AVM OI SOYIIIOLO KY[ f�W fYlFou Cawn.r�[v r01M� .o n•eaa � -TW ; ;_- --1;� _,...�_ S = ,.. _ wu_ ... .. '.�..�..`.�'.'t'��..0«.^�.'.�..�.. � •r `�O`f wr ..�i'A � ' �i��.�. .aox��wwr�i.r wN.µ��, `.„p� , �. \ II.... '.��,�n ... . ��iw�i �w w�_ir�ii •M. � . �� u�.rw�• }~ I� �� • a�rrux . . a.L�i`~'�.�r�"rii"iau:+ii • P Y , ' ' »".�..^�'..�"'L�'.nS.TdC"' t M ._.._.,.._ — — _ .«�• .�,:�:�...;;.... �v J --'=5��— ...�..��..�.»....... .ao ,..,�.� .�.� �..,. ...,�., ��»«f o,s.,u.. �.s,�,. YOUN6 6 YOUNG "...� MV[111[M•M[�1011F IIN��M�.MpfAM�4[y�IM � IIpC1[ MO) /C/N MIY�1M�{M�tfYU�LLN��Mf ' � wws.ww.iw�waw+ � Ittt4i[M[N�lM) � I � � � � •�" ��v�'r��a�� ..'' .:� 3 � � d v,''=, � v ,,,.+'9.�� . Town Hall. �309� Main Road py�--.� P.O. Box 1179 �>:�� .-� ',j�p�� Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE • TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 3, 1989 David Rapell 400 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Hanauer/Bagley SCTM#1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Kapell: The Planning Board has reviewed the concerns brought up at the meeting held on June 12, 1989. As stated in the Positive Declaration, the upland area of the subject premises does not meet the minimum lot area requirement £or the Agricultural-Conservation (AC) District. The Planning Board can not proceed with this application as it does not conform to the requirements of the above mentioned district. If you wish, upon receipt of a disapproval from the Building Department, you can proceed with an application before the Zoning Board of Appeals for an area variance. 'Fhe Planning Board will withhQld the re-scheduling of the scoping session until notification that the Zoning Board of Appeals has made a determination on the application. Please contact the office if you have any further questions. ery tr ly o rs . -Lrt/►t'' � , BENNETT OFtLOWSKI, JR. CFIAIRMAN cc: �anford Hanauer, Applicant Milton IIagley, Applicant ' Kenneth Coenen, Applicant' s Consultant James A. Schondebare, Town Atterney Thomas W. Cramer, Town Consultant Zoning Board of Appeals Building Department . _. .. � .� - _. � . �. ., .. -� _ �� .. �� .-� .� c �-. H .� �-. .1 � r . � 4 �^� � � =- ` � ��4�,yFfOC!(��G ' .. �, , .y � ,. :��?`, � � ;: ,y." z PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS c+ > '„r�' . �'r+ SCOTT L. HARRIS u'+ ' ::' �. . Bennetl Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �✓0•,;3� � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ;3'�� ;,.p� Rithard G. Ward �1 �� ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa� Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box I 179 Kenneth L. Edwards pLAN1VING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York I1971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765•1823 November 21 , 1990 ' David Kapell 400 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 RE: subdivision Proposal for Hanauer/Bagley SCTM# 1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Kapell; The Planning Board has reviewed the discussion which took p2ace, at your client' s request, at the November 13 , 1990, Planning Board meeting. The Board' s position has not changed from that stated in their Ju2y 3 , 1989, correspondence (copy enclosed) . The parcel is located in the Agricultural-Conservation (AC) District. The upland areas of the proposed lots do not meet the minimum lot requirements for this district. The Planning Board . can not proceed with this application as it does not conform to the requirements of the above mentioned district. Zf you wish, you can proceed with an application before the .Zoning Board of Appeals for an area variance. , Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, �� j� Bennett Orlowski, Jr. � Chairman enc. cc: Sanford Hanauer, Applicant � Milton Bagley, Applicant Harvey A. Arnoff, Town Attorney Gerard P. Goehrinqer, Chairman, Zoninq Board of Appeals Victor Lessard, Principal Suilding Inspector NHtl YOR� { ,4'f�R71dEf(T OF ENUIRONINEFf�h� Jl�(7I0'! • �REguRataui A�(5a,in.a Un.i.! . Bt.�g. 40, SU1N--Room 419 Stony Artook, NY 11794 (516) 151-7900 W i ciG i�...t F 1�11i ak�a�.. Yetern� sr 2 � /9 �'� Ma�n l�� L��or LdWrtr+ce Sftp�ehsoh, - p.o. E3o�J � `�'z `� -T �I.>! I/9S 2 r MQ�1 Tut �� L • L•� RE: �r�P.t1'Ty � T l�dW1�GkCC ��CphChSOh Duvc Ms. �} bi9 a � � ��c�C �aw, -1-or Lau� reMcc J 7�e�o� etiso� A hev.i.ew hae beQn mad2 oS yo:vr. ry�opoaai to: �) �/ ri[t�e�vP `,Jf'bPerT/ I / I — p.�. ; W„ o �/ Sau�ti1o%� I / n NOI"Ml� P�f' �oY�o�'► �e�n O � ��9��houSG RA. ar�q .SOur.�l vlCcu HV�. ,,. o�$oK�'L�t,�'�'OK' Tn�tru`+� on -fl,e c:orner �t -�.i.� /n�^crsecfior. , �brce � rs S�'�u•�ea,/ �, /K J � ^�S � ��at�ti'f) atn� '� -�-/ve Sou��. Su o Cp. -Tw YY14� F� �rief� 066 J �o�'� S o��(c O,S'p � as s�ow �w -�a�l ►'►'�.tP G�+ � The N�u Yo S e e�art�ent o� Env.i�co�nnt�l Conae�eva.tion {eas defi¢rtn�n�l �' /� a #hat .the a6ove prto�ee.t ,i,e: � j}e pa- D f _ �lone xhan ]Od' �l�com Fhe6kuo.t¢Jc (4p,t.Cttnda �c�y �q�e� u The Faeeha,w.te�c WetCande pn.eaent an.¢ .tvntazi.vety mapped aa Le,ee .thax 12.4 �Ir_ T� ae�r.es and have no.t 6een dee.i.gna.ted 6y .the Sta.te ae ha.v�.no uuwsua,L Locu,e Sy�/�� , .ioiport.taxae at .thi.e .time ao an.e not eunrtentty hegu�la.ted 6� NYS`DEC ' 7he we,ttande pa.v.ae�it evte T.i,da.� and ,i.t appuua .thaz you need .to appCy 6on. /f ' ')1� r ' — a T' G1etCancia P¢nmi.t Wl cf5�°� ThelceboRe,"no pvhmi.t wutaR AR.LEcee 24 (Fneaiwx�Le�c We.LCands l o,� .Lke Env.i�con- � a�er�ta,L Conaenva�i.on 1aw .i.e Requ.i/ced. � � � Wlc� 0� Ve�uj�ou�,a�� _ �2 Uan,i,eP J. Larth,i.n Reg.i.ona.� P�Junf,t Adinini.e.tltc.toa DJL=RNf:ez � �"'�'_ - _ �,, � . � � LAW OIIIC[3 WICKHqM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, n.c. MAIN ROAD, P.O. BOX 1424 MATTITUCk LONG ISLAND wiLu�w WiCnwr,m NEW YORR 11952 ERIG J.BRClSLCR - AGIOAII A.W 1CIf NAN 516-29B-B353 FNANa�YN w.F/�qR13 December 8, 1983 Building Inspector Town of Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Application of Hanauer fi Bagley Property at Soundview Ave. � Lighthouse Road, Southold, N.Y. Suffolk Co. Tax Map �1000-50-6-4 Dear Sir: Application was made to the Planning Board for a minor subdivision of two lots , as shown on the 'enclosed map . Because there are less than two acres of upland for each lot, the Planning Board was required to deny sketch plan approval based upon the two-acre zoning ordinance. We therefore in- tend to apply to the Board of Appeals for a variance and would appreciate your sending us a Notice of Disapproval. • Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, ��l , Abigail A. Wickham AAW:emu encl. cc : Mr. Sanford Hanauer - y w�v t;�3vu-x�v.�� f� O`4 � � CE OF IIUILRING INSPGCY�r � ' � :� PA, DOX 728 ' : � TOWN liALi. ' `� '�� +' � � SOU"fiIOLA,N.Y. i 1971 � .,c�\1 �� E' Y��'�� . r • February 7.9 , 1987 To: Bennett Ot�lowski, Planning Board Chairman ,/ � EFtOM: Vzator Le�satd, 8xecutive Adininistrator`� SUII�7ECT: Wst7.xind Areas Zt is my undesstanding that pazcols containing wet7.ands, sand pits, 2tc. for purposes o£ det¢zmining the area of a parcel only, raust be zncluded in the ca- cuiations. The board �hould take this appzoach, until such ti,me the State wishes to changa its° laws. . - ; � . ' . �.1� �tl ��1 � 2�� • . . .. . � TOTRL P.01 � . __.. . . . _ _ . �1szC+ � ° y\ y/� A � �, .��. ..��.., . �,Q' � ' l A� \� � T r�J L�. � L j . TCL. ��s-iso, 1\aJ �g�1FF0�K�`0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD � �i� OFFICE OF l3UILDING INSPC•C'I'Olt ��C�!\ � � P.O. BOX 7'8 TOWN HALL �\�\ �+'� �� SOUTHOLD, N.Y. I 1971 �C �1 � ,�� February 19 , 1987 TO: Bennett Orlowski, Planning Board Chairman FROM: Victor Lessard, Executive Administrator\ SUIIJECT: Wetland Areas It is my understanding that parcels containing wetlands, sand pits, etc. for purposes of determining the area of a parcel only, must be included in the ca- culations. The board should take this approach, until such time the State wishes to change its ' laws. � C�� `� �\� C . • r • c�FFO(,YC � � � � �� Southold Town Board of A eals � �' MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SDl1THOlD. L.I.,pp 11971 �l � r� TELEPHONE (516) 765�1809 APPEAl580AND �r� C ��— 9',` � MEMBERS GERARO P. GOEHRINGER, CNAIRMAN CHARlES GRIGONIS.JR. SERGE DOYEN. JR. ROBERT J. DOUGLASS Md,Y � 5 � � 9H� JOSEPH M. SAWICKI Abigail A. Wickham , Esq . Wickham , Wickham & Bressler , P . C . Main Road , Box 1424 Mattituck , NY 11952 Re : Appeal No . 3214 - Hanauer and Bagley (Variances ) Dear Gail : This letter will confirm our recent conversations in the above matter . Our Town Attorney has advised that Court Decisions were rendered during 1986 indicating that wetland areas cannot be deleted when calculating the area of lot (s ) in pending or proposed divisions of land . At our Regular Meeting held April 2 , 1987 , the Board of Appeals reviewed and concurred with the February 19 , 1987 Memorandum of the Building Inspector and Town Attorney' s Opinion that wetland areas cannat be deleted from the area of a lot for proposed set-offs or other divisions of land . Inasmuch as your application is for Variances under Article III , Section 100-31 of the Zoning Code , it would appear that if your proposal is for a minimum lot area of 80 ,000 sq . ft . and minimum lot width of 175 feet for each a proposed lot , for single-family dwelling use and meeting J� all other zoning requirements , a variance is not required. � Please be sure to check with Mr . Lessard of the Building Department as to whether or not in his opinion any other variances or appeal would be necessary under the Town Code . If you feel that you would like to proceed with a variance application with all of the above in m4nd , please , let us know . We are transmitting copies of this� letter to the Planning . • � � � , Page 2 - May 15 , 1987 Re : Appeal No . 3214 - Hanauer & Bagley Abi9ail A. Wickham , Esq . Board and Building Department for their files , as well as the Suffolk County Health Department for their pending Article VI application . Unless we hear otherwise , we will assume that this variance application is to be deadfiled . Yours very truly , ��j��--� GERARD P . GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN lk — � Enclosure cc : Planning Board Building Department Suffolk County Health Department , � C�NTY OF SUFFOLK � � m'o 0 . � � �� %q Michael A. LoGrande . SUFFOLK COUNTY E%ECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTN SERVICES Davio H�rtn�s,M.D..M.P.N. . COMMISSIONER � May 29, 1987 David E. Kapell ' Kapell Real Estates Inc. 10 �landers Road Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 � RE: Hanauer & Begley (T) Southold Dear Mr. Kapell: Based upon the information you have su�nitted, the soil conditions appear to be acceptable for the installation of individual sewage disposal systems on Parcels 1 and 2. In addition, any final maps submitted to the Department should clearly show the high water mark and wetlands of the pond. Since the Zoning Board is no longer involved in the SEQRA � process, this Department will be coordinating with the Planning Board in relation to the location of the sewage disposal system to any wetlands. If you have any questions concerning this, please feel free to contact me. • Very truly yours, � a��— � Royal R. Reynolds, P,E. Sr. Public Health Enqineer Bureau of Wastewater Management RRR:ljr . cc: Southold Planning Board COUNTYCENTCq 548-3312 WIVERIICAO.N.Y. 11901 l • � * ' 1'OEH N0. f TOWN OF SOUTHOLD lUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HAI.L SOUTHOLD, N. Y. BUILDING PERMIT (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL GQMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) ►va 15 i 5U z oate ........: .. . . ....�........................., i9..?�.� Pertnissi� is hereby gronted to: Al�:..�7..C�,n.aw4-..Y... ..J c�� ...�.�..�'��:...............................�'.� .�.1:��-�"....�.:y.: 1 � ?�..y .......... . ......... . . .. �o .P��.�(':.....�...�:....�...�.�.�:,,�:..`�.�-:�-Q-�-':•:.�.....�...�?.�t,�-d.... `-}Q:;�., ' � v-a a.�..�„�.Q / ' / S� ......... ........ ........... .. ......�...............�.....�.....��.........�.............�.�...��.........� ...... ..... ... . .. ... � � n ct premius Ixcted ot �2 J J..Si.:.�.....�:'�:.`.!-�-� �� S � � �3�-•-��W �1,Jt • �k WJ�'tY. ....................... ............. ........... +.............i................ ................................................................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................................................................................ County Tox Map No. 1000 Section ......Q 5�...... Block .....��........ Lot No. ...0...!............. oursuant to application dated .....�!�'!�!:�X...�..�.................... 19�.�.., and cpproved by rhe Building Inspector. Fee $•..'.�.'.....�/ i-. . ! ; �� . �.� ; �:.� �/i �...!'. �-:"� VL... ..�.............�...5..... ........... Guiioing inspecro� • - � _ _ ` - - �: „'�;i'=`' � � � , '� ��y✓ .4:�,1�?�� r� . � ��;• �,.. .� � � '::' �iN,. �' �L. � '�'..Y :•"3�� YI� T^ . u,�,,� ,,�� .� to�cn Hall. 53095 Main Road p`•:��'"' , �' P.O. Box 1179 ''✓ - ,.••�� Southold. A'ew York 1 19?1 �.'•a� '?; ',a TEIEPHONE (516)765-19J8 PLA,�INING BOARD OFFICE ' T01�N OF SOUTHOLD July 3, 1g89 � David Kapell 40U Front Strest Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Har,auer/Bagley SCTM#1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Kapell: The Planning Board has reviewed the concerns brought up at the meeting held on June 12, 1989. As stated in the Positive Declaration, the ugland area of the subject premises does not r�eet the minimum lot area requirement for the Agricultural-Conservation (AC) District. The Planning Board can not proceed with this application as it does not conform to the requirements of, the above mentioned district. If you wish, upon receipt �` a flisapproval �ro^+ t;�e F3uilding Department, you can proceed with an appli��tion refore the Zoning Board of Appeals for an area variance. The Planning Boazd will withhold the re-scheduling oE the scoping session unti2 notification that the Zoning Board of Appeals has made a determination on the application. Please contact the office if you have any further questions. ��t�tr ly o s . � • BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. • CHAIRMAN � cc: Sal�ford Hanauer, Applicant Milton Bagley, Applicant • Kenneth Coenen, Applicant's Consultant �ames A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Thomas W. Cramer, Town Consultant Zoninq Board of Appeals Buildinq Department �� •� � .� r � • � .� • . a � • �� • � � �i � �. � �.. � �. � ._. �• • � �/\�1 T ` ' ��c.�1�fOt1(�+�G . � � . .'��t7V� � PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o � a'r . - '�'�*+ SCOTT L. HARRIS `, � Benneq Odowski, Jr., Chairman 0�,.�� . � Supecvisor Geurge Ritchie Latham, Jr. �'� ;`b0 Richard G. Ward �1 :.'� � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box f 179 Kennzth L. Edward� Southoid, New York I1971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765•1823 November 21, 1990 � David Kapell 400 Front Street Greenport, New York 11944 ' RE: Subdivision Proposal for Hanauer/Bagley SCTM# 1000-50-6-4 Dear Mr. Kapell; The Planning Board has reviewed the discussion which took place, at your cZient' s request, at the November 13 , 1990, Plattninq Board meeting. The Board's position has not changed from that stated in their July 3, 1989, correspondence (copy enclosed) . Tt�e parcel is located in the Agricultural-Conservation (AC) District. The upland areas of the proposed lots do not meet the minimum lot requirements for this district. The Planning Board can not proceed with this application as it does not conform to the requirements of the above mentioned district. If you wish, you can proceed with an application before the .Zoning Board of Appeals for an area variance. Please contact this office if you have any questions reqardinq the above. Very truly yours, ��riswi�' � �i/� Bennett Orlowski, Jr. l� Chairman enc. cc: Sanford Hanauer, Applicant � Milton Baqley, Applicant Harvey A. Arnoff, Town Attorney, Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoninq Board of Appeals Victor Lessard, Principal Buildinq Inspector I , . �� ZONIYG BOARD OF APPEALS I'OWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORri AP?EAL OF SUE HANAUER 8. JOAN BAGLEY, APFELLANTS FROM THE BUILDING INSPECTOR' S "NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT, " DATED UECEMBER 5, 1990 STATc^ OF YEW YOkK) � ss: COUNTY OF SUFFOLti) KENNETH C. COENEN, being duly sworn. deposes and says: 1. My name is :Senneth G. Coenen ana I reslde at 18b Wading c?iver Hoad, Manorville, Y. Y. 11949. This a22idavit is written on benaif oi the peLicioner's application to che Southold Town Zoning Boara of Appeals ior a variance, ana in supporc oi Lhe above captionea appeai. 2. Since January of 1974 I have been employed in various capacities as a proxessionai planner, specializing in environmental planning. Mucn oi my proieasionai career involvee a variety of projects located on the eastern end of Long Island, including the 'iown oY Southold. 3. The application of Hanauer 8. Bagley for a division oi property and the buiiding of two houses on said property ` { � a • locaied in the ?own oi Southoid vill not, in my opinion narm the environment, nor cause any damages to wetlands locaLea on the property. 4. Chapter 97 02 the Coae of the Town oi Soucnoid, antitlea "Wetlands" was enacted to provlde ior the "protection, preservation , proper maintenance ana use oi ithe Town'sJ wetlands in order to minimize damage iorm erosion, turbidity or siltation, �altwater intrusion. loss oY fisn, sheilsish or otner beneiicial marine organisme, aquatic wildlife and vegeLation and the destruction oi the naLural haDicat tnereoi, to minimize danger of flood and storm-tide damage and pollucion ant to otherwlse protect the quality oi weclands, tidal waters, marshes, shorelines, beaches and natural drainage systems for their conservation, economic , aesthetic, recreational and other public uses and values, and, further, 'to protect the potable fresh water suppiies oY the tovn from the dangers oi drougnt, overdrait, pollucion irom saltwacer intrusion and misuse or mismanagement. " 5. Phe lana whicn appllcanLs Hanauer and Bagley wish to � dlvide concains a small ireshwater pond and an associated . � � • �� • � wetland fringe surrounding the pond. The wetlands have been delineated on several surveys prepared by Young and Young, land surveyors. b. Freshwater wetlands, as defined by the Town of Southold in Ghapter 97 oi the �ode oi tne Town o2 S'outhold are " ( 1 ) Freshwater wetlands as deiined in Article 24, iitle 1 Subsection 24-0107, 5ubdivisions 1 (a) to 1 (d) inclusive of the Environmental Gonservatlon Law oi che S'tate o2 New Yoric; and ( 2> Al1 land immediately ad�acent io a "Sreshwater wetland" as definea in Subsection 8( 1 ) and iying within seventy-five C75) feet landward oi the most landward edge of a "fresnwater wetland. " " (7) In Subsection 97-20 "Permii required. " af Southold Town's Wetland Lavr, a permit is required ior; "A. Permit required. Notwithstanaing any prior course 02 conduct or permisaion granted, no person shall conduct operations on any wetlands in the Iown o3 Southold unless he ahall 2irst obtain a written permit therefor issued by � authority of the Trustees as hereina2ter provided and only . �- � �- • while such permit remains in effect. (emphasis added> "9. Notwithstanding the provisions oi Subsection p o= this section, the Trustees may, by resolution, waive the requirement oi a permit with respect to lands immediateiy adjacent to wetlands, as deiined in 3ubsection A(3) or B(2) of the aeYinition oi ' wetlands' in Subsection 97-13, i2 the i'rustees iind and determine that no operations are proposed on sucn lanns, or that the operations proposed thereon. comply vith the standards set iorr.h in Subseccion 97-28 oi chis chapter. " 8. Operations are definea in Subsection 37-i:i oi the Wetland law as; "A. The removal oi ma2er�a1 from weclands. B. The deposit oi material on wetlands. C. The erection, construction, alteracion or enlargement oi any building, docic, pier. wnarx, bulkhead, jetty, groin or other structure, temporary or permanent, on wetlands. " 9. Applicants Hanauer and Bagley are proposing no2hing thaL is a regulated activity according to the Town o2 .__._ .. .. . . . . � � �- � . � � Southold Wetland Law (Chapter 97 of the Town Code) in 'that they are only proposing to subdivide the land whicn is an unregulated activity. Additionally, the proposed house construcLion on the lot without a building permit, is also an unregulatea activity because che enLire construccion will be beyona the 75 ioot line from the edge of the wetlands, ana thus is outside the jurisdiction of the wetland law. 10. The Southold Town Planning Boara, in procesaing the application of Hanauer and Bagley for subdivision approval, has addressed the State Environmental Buality Review Act, <SEORA) by first issuing a negative declaration, if the applicants were to abandon their effort to subdivide the property, and only consLruct the house ior which a building permit was issued. The Planning Board, in a subsequent decision, issued a positive declaration and requested the preparation of a full Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS> ior the subdivision oi the land into two lots. The Planning Board was concerned regarding several issues related to the wetlands and pond located on the property, particularly the potential for contamination o2 the pond from , , � • �- � underground sanitary systems. 11. The Planning Board, in issuing their positive declaration, ignored much intormation supplied to the Planning Board by the applicants, including the engineering :epori stacing the pond is a perched boay oi water, noi connected io the groundwater in the area, and Would not be aifected �y the construction oi an underground sanitary sysiem which would discharge to the aqui2er and not the waters oP the perched pond. The Planning Board also ignored the various reports supplied to the board regarding the nature and extent oi the wetlands iound on tne properiy which found the wetlands to be common vegetation type wetlands surrounding che fringes o= the pond, oifering no speclal values other than those vaiues normally associated with vetlande. �:_��(`-��'�� riennech �. Goenen Sworn to beiore me this ��/%�day of March, 1991. � Notary ublic :AflOI :. HA;:SAi1K ':JTFRY PIl?LIC. :tate of Npw�a� quolified in SuriolM CeunW , `io. 5:�"26"/3 ?nrm Exn!rey /� �3//%� . . � � • � � riE�iNETH C. COENEN, AI�P i3o waaing rciver koaa � Manorville, �. Y. :1949 � � 515-ei7II-7.398 Educational Sackgrouna 1571-1972 Moncclair Siace Coliege, Upper Montclair, N. J. i972-1974 Long Islana Universlty, 5outnampton Genter, Southampcon, ;[. z. 3. A. cnvi�onmenLal 5cience rroiessionai Experience 1588 - Present ;resiaent, tiampton - ilanor Associates, Manorville, Y. Y. rirm provides planning, aevelopment and zoning se�rvices environmencal asseasment ana zaciliciea locacions servicea and permit processing services. ConsultaLion servicea provided co a numner oi clients regarding real estace ana oLner matiers. iiecent pro�ecc� include preparation of a Environmental Impact Statement ior 96• acre wateriront subdiviaion, design and procesaing o2 several residential developments ana permic services ior several ciients. Consultant to the newly incorporated Village oi Pine Valley, N. Y. regarding preparation of a Kaster Plan, zoning codes and other village legislaiion. Appearances belore various planning boards, zoning boards ana Town ana Village Boards as well as stace and county agencies. Inscructor ior the land use segment o£ training :equired tor persons enrollea in Heal Estate Salesperson courses at two private schools. 1985-1987 General Manager, Clause Planning Goncepts, Inc. Mactituck, N. Y. Duties included the preparation and processing of subdivlsion plans, zone cinange applicazions for the . � � � � Kenneth G. Coenen, AICP rage �. construction oi senior citizen housing, a=fordable housing plans, commercial siie plans, preparation oi environmental impact studies and reai escate consultation ior a variety ot pro�ects located on eastern Long Island and in southwest Florida. Preparation of a Pacilities location study as subcontractor 1or Lhe relocation ot the East Hampton Post Of.tice. Appearances before a variecy oi Town and Village boards and agencies. 1982-1584 Senior Envlronmental Planner, inter-Science itesearcn Associates, Inc. Southampton, N. Y. 11968 Involved with the design ana processing �i subdivision applicaiions within several political ,7urisdictions, preparation oi Environmental Impact Statemencs ior several ma�or development projects within the Towns o2 Southampton and East Hampton, N. Y. Preparation of a business area plan for tne Pown oY East Hampton 2or 10 minor business districts, and an environmentai study ior the Lake ilontaux drainage basin. Involved aith reviews of updated master plans and zoning ordinances ior several clients. 1980-1982 Environmental Planner, Frederick P. Clark Associates, Rye, N. Y. 10480 Partial responsibilities included preparation of wetland maps for the Town of Darien, Ct. , environmental management plan Sor the Village oi Mill Neck, N. Y. , subdivision design Por several developments in Weatchester and Rockland County, traffic and parking study for the Wasnington Heights/Inwooa area oi Mannattan. Conaulting Town Planner to the 'Cown ot Pound Ridge, N. Y. where responsibilities included the day to day review o2 development plans and environmental studies and final preparation oi an update of the Town's Master Plan. Assisted in the preparation ot several major environmental impact siatements ana a plan ior the iuture of Hempstead Harbor for the Town oi North Hempstead. Project Planner for the Town oi East Hampton Business area plan. 1974-1980 Group for America's South Fork, Inc. , , � � • , ' , Kenneth G. Goenen, AICP ?age 3. Bridgehampton, N. Y. 11932 Began as student intern and progresseG to increasingly responsible positions of Research Assistant and finally Research Director within this not-for-profit organization. Responsible Ior providing poiicy statements regarding land use issues and environmental research. Issues included, residential and commercial land development, planning and zoning, cransier oi development rights and purchase o2 development rights as planning tools, potable water policy, iarmland preservation, ecological resource protection, parkland and open space policy, shoreline and wetlands protection. Znitiaied independent water quality laboratory program which received State certiiications. Supervised atudent intern program. Appointed to the Town oi Southampton Farmland Preservation Advisory Gommittee. Guest speaker at various civic functions and guest lecturer ai Long Island University, Southampton Center, regarding shoreline issues. Appearances beiore a wide variety oi state, county and local agencies. Personal Data Born: March 18. 1953 Paterson N. J. Married with three sans Achieved rank oY Eagle Scout with the Boy Scouts Executive Board member and General Manager oi the Manorville Athletic League, Inc. Licensed Real Estate Salesman Pro=essional Affiliations Member - American Institute of Gertified Planners Member - American Planning Association . �. � �- � � PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION � Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the applicatio� for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional infarmation you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and wiil not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION I �� bA�vig , o.� � � Sve l�.Y,�Aa�a ,— Jv�tti: �3r}c � LOCATION OF ACTION(Ineluds StraN AdErsae.Munlelpallty aM County) �7 y�' C y. uv � v ,rui �•�e �� L� t�o�JSE I��A �o✓( 4c�.D .l�C /�' C./ : NAME OF APPUCANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE ' E � ,� � �� 3�r� <<�.�, �3 z- � ADDRE55 ��J � W EC7� tl a'� � CITY/PL `1 ATE 7JP CODE �`'t �jvL'• N . /l�l NAME OF OWNER�111 Altlerant) BU51NE55 TELEPHONE 1 1 ADORESS CIN/PO STATE ZIP COOE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION / / „(� � 5�5� ��7,v-� .�� y. 5 �-�,zE ��rz« ��, T� z. ./� �5 I Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable , A. S1te Deacription Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present fand use: rJUrban ❑Industrial �Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) �Rura� (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture S�Other VA-u>wf� v��'��+ l ��✓sF UA�GER CuuS7��.z}�c.; 2. Total acreage of project area: U � y � acres. APPROXIMATE ACREACE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) � � � acres �• 5 acres Water Surface Area � � S acres � ' � acres Unvegetated (Rock, eartfi or fili) - scres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) 'a �'�'>�/}N� � • y acres 2� ' acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? S�^`��5 �p"'ry ��i��`! a. Soil drainage: �Well drained 2 3 "/o of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site OPoorly drained �� % of site , b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the �YS land Classification System? N � acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on pro�e t site� ❑Yes '�o � � a. What is depth to bedrock? �� (in feet) 2 • � i � � �ppro�;mate percentage oi proposed�project site with slopes ��0•tU':o _S__ '�o _10-1 i6o 2 ci o� �15% or grea[cr ^.o G. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Nauonal Registers of Historic Places? C�Yes �o ". Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ,:.,Yes �vo 8. What is the depth of the water table? _�(in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquiter? �es ❑No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing apportunities presently exist in the project area? �'es ONo �7. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? •-- ❑Yes ��lo Aeeording to r�.-= T .N`l,n�c'F:c.� r 2e-?e+n'r' - /�PNNE'f'L C Ci+.-.u2-.� Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) 1�4es ❑No Describe �-2��c� w�-fit�z �r'n,.y� 13. Is fhe project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ,�Yes ❑No If yes, explain i,7 ,�.•tr;z i<_� -;�rr{;,;i nN F�v.+� 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community7 6�'es ❑No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: � /�'" a. Name of Stream and name of River to whic it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name �%B� ��""�n b. Size (In acres) �, 5�T 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? �es ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow cannectiont �es ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allaw connection? �Yes �'flo '18. Is the site located in an agricultural strict certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304� ❑Yes � o 79. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the EGL, and 6 NYCRR 677? OYes -�'No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal oF solid or hazardous wastes� �Yes '�40 B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale oF project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor �• i '- acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: � - � '� acres initially; �. 5= acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped � acres. d. length of project, in miles: � � (If appropria[e) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed /� � %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing � ; proposed � . Zi g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)� h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Candominium Initially Z `� �_ � Ultimately Z . '/,�- i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure � height: width: length. j linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? �� ft. 3 ♦ i � / • .• �. • ` 2. How much natwal material (i.e -ack, earth, etcJ will be removed from the site? � ronslcubic y�rds 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? �es ❑No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intend_.. purpose is the site being reclaimed? ��< > b. �'ill topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation7 --E,iTYes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ��es ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? � " '' acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes �Io 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction � �— months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of finai phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases� ❑Yes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction� ❑Yes .�lo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction �; after project is complete �� - '10. 'Number of jabs eliminated by this project � . 'I'I. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes �o If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved� ;es �No - a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etcJ and amount _ _.,,_.�_ _. ' b. Name of water body into which effiuent wiil be discharged 13.:Is subsurtace liquid waste disposal involvedT �es ❑No Type �4. WiII surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal� ❑Yes [S�14o Expiain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a '100 year flood plain� ❑Yes J9d�lo 16. Will the project generate solid wastet �Ses ' ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month �f�S �*�� / tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ��Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name '��.� ��,��• � � ; location �A��.n �n d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfillT pYes 7�iCo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? �IYes �No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposall ��=-s tt�r.0 i tonslmonth. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? �% � years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes �No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes �lo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes �fVo p�G= S�,�f 21. Will project resul[ in an increase in energy use? �Yes ❑No �f yes . indicate tYPe(s) �' � ( ; �`, e ��ctn,� ,�.i G„:z H�wf �,� �,�� . '�;2A-�✓r.oaz�'fitL.� � i 22. If wa[er supply is �rom wells, indicate pumping capaci[y � � gallonslminute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day - s`� �"�gallons�day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding� �Yes �1Jo If Yes, explain 4 --. __ _ __ _ . + � � « •:5. Appro�a:• Requ.�ed: �� Submiltal Type Date Ci.Y. Town. �u�.,ge Goaru _�..1'es �No � City. Town. Villa4e Planning Board c'�Yes ❑No �pr'1mr�l /5 3 3 City. Town Z.onir,g Board �Yes ❑No �" e'W l 9 5 I City, Counh• Health Department FYes ❑No ��sRN��-.�}+z7 �p,ed�� Other Local Agencies ❑Yes �lo Other Regional Agencies �Yes �Jo State Agencies ❑Yes Q�No Federal Agencies OYes �o C. Zoning and Planning Information 'I . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision� �es ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ,� � ❑zoning amendment �zoning variance ❑special use permit 9lsubdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 2 �<- �' t �?�Si n�,��r I 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? � 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? _ � ��k 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ►J ) r� ' { 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted localland use plans? �es ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/. mile redius of proposed action� A<� �1 �:Q Z A-�i2E� ��5 ;:� :N��4� � 7G�'Y �rTcD i2E�.Jc.c.�i�t� DcJF�U�•°�-w� �l 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining(surrounding .land uses within a Y. mile? �(es ONo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposedt � a. What is che minimum lot size proposed? Z { ActC"5 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer ar water districts? OYes '�No 17 . Will the proposed ction create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? �es Jo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? �Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of treffic.significantly above present levelst ❑Yes ❑No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional ireffic? .�es ONo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clariFy your prcject. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the inFormation provided abov/e�is true to the best of my knowledge. �pplicant.'Spons'o/r Name,��ti� / � e � LVF�c.0 �S il-„EtiIV- - Date �5 9/ iignature �-'--�! �• �£R+"�-- Title ��%'9✓ �fi� If lhe action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete Ihe Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 _ ___ . _ _ � �.. r � � ' ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Appeal of SUE HANAUER and JOAN BAGLEY, Appellants, From the Building Inspector' s "Notice of Disapproval for Building Permit" , dated December 5, 1990. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . REILLY, LIKE & TENETY Attorneys for Appellants 200 West Main Street Babylon, NY 11702 Tel. (516) 669-3000 _ F�DD Ni>W..�PO�I � IV�.� DECLA 7 ��r ' „ ,. . �».� �..y . „«,.�.w.� � �,�„� ..�„ — ` ` ` N i. ,' �] l �'� : 5 3 �-- _ ��,k ; fR PiG >80Q OOlOi ��.� 1 ril i�� '��'�r��. �� _ .« M. , �LI..E PdUMB , ��"i�Af� : '.: , :. . � . � .. __. �E.AD F�( ENt Y .�G.� F300 � ��. I �w i � �( . � , ... " i _... . , � . IIIi ' �i � . i . � .. � '.. ..: " �� : � �: � � . . ' — JFF'[CE �r� BOARC - Flann�ing Boea �9 � �- � �'� �� '��'� ' .:�� " .,,, . . � '�� .:�<Y .....�.. � � � .,. .,... . /N)� ...... � : : ....:: �: .,, : ... . :�. � . . .. . ...... . .. . ... .. _ .�, �.. � � , r�� ' � ,�.�.NERI:C ESS: N �'� TIT�E Hanauer & !'anlev , � ' ' `: l�b �-�P;! TNVOL.VFD : �.N. ..... .. :: ..,,". , ' i..... .. : �.:. ;�� „ . ..... , ' ..,...... . .. ,. . - - �::� . �ESCRIPTION R�bd.�vade 4. 945 i�, i��- '� � .�' � .::�, : .'�'.� � .....: -�� ' In � . .. , .. ..... � .�� . - , _ , ,;� , 1 oc Sc,und ' �� - View Avenue. � ; ;' ,` ; :°' ':: :: , d��lll�lta�l�lll�!!l�i�l�`��i��'�l�� .. __ 3FVELOPM�'N f 1 YF'� K '� , ...::::: ,Dd I E '>,__ � ,:ftes9.da�ntial s�.�bdivision �:.: '� -a< .'s. t: � � -� � � � � '�' :ii � �; �� '! i ...:.:.. . .� omm�.. rc�. -�1 Ir��ustria] , � � � � a � ' Priv�tR Other Governm' t � i .r� f .� I I �. �� _ .. . ..... ..... .. �..:::: ..I"�P_C�1�� 1 � .. . .... ....... ......:.::::.:: ;�i'ri t�i � rarus o: ' ... ...... . .................. • / ; � � ... ...... ................ . : ...... .. ........... 'i r�ari : :�� i � nt . ......:..:.:.:::::: ::_: , . � 9f'S O ..;.. � OK Withdrawn Void��"�`�:��i�� E.EE;°:EF ina.�. f [ � '�`; ' ........................ ... . . ..........:::::::::.:::::::::i ::::::::::::::::..:.....:_:...:.::.. . :... ............................. .... . .. . ...;! �: ............. .. .. ....... .. .::. .... ............ .:::::-::P"ind:�.i��c�s r':.1�-��i �' / / . ..... ... :. :: �� - :: �� .................. .......... .: ... ::: ......... �� .... .... .............................:::::::::::::::�:::::::�::::: .cil::iiiiiiiiiiiiiSiililiiiiEiiiiicii![iiiliiia:iiEiiiE'ieiEEiEiElEiilEfii:'i[iiiiifEiEiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiEfiiiEii�f'i ................... �-+r'r`n t F'E�r. � '� , ,.. . . ....... . ........;..... :::-::.: ��IfHI1�N�ll{II�'I��4; �: :..::.: :::::: �u6Fi� 2MPORTANT �� y 7� �_ 1 E:, ];��.aixa�.lb�r : �� '?S ]? ]I. - «1, "a' ;>, t:r r,:) aJ — O O 1 O 3 ': Us,� t:Y c e��.�o�..�e� �number in all c:�r�•� :�_ �,��-�r��.,=, �,�out this action ! ' To the Lead Agency : The above in}ormati��n c�;,iy°;[i�•in;; 1;h_�',: y=;� ,.irv,:;;;;; on the describcd Positive Declaration were oi`•P �cr.L2;i:l:.y r;" :=i;�✓n.;y ::�,� , and entered in the SEf,IR Repository on the deatefa; l sh•ux�r i •i thne bc:�;; headed DATE RECEIVED above. The latest filinci is :.ndi.c�it:ed I � � 1::fr> rmost recent date in that box. The dete and t:imer :,n t:hc� se :r i�cl : irie show when this document was printed. Pl.��a._�E� ��h�:�r.k tl� � [r-,Pc+-on�et;i;,�n above carcfully. For corrections or question:e, ror�;E�ct C ir, r•le=s L,c;�,r.:N;rpW, (518)457-2224, or write to: >E(Jii Itgp��<, at7r..�r ,,. PJY@iIJEC p; � :i .;:icri r,sv° F?e9ulatory Affairs °iiD Wo:.�` F'crid, f�or.�rn Pi14 Altii9n)': P 'Y' 1.2�''.';S3 Town of SOUTHOLD Planning Board ` 53095 Mein Road-P. O. Ba;c lil7"3 JUL T 1991 Southold, NY 11971 � c, a., . . _, _ ; � FORM NO. 7 ��`/ � '1 y. �� TQWN OF SOUTHOID BUI�DING DEPARTMENT � I Z� TOWN HALL v � . SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11977 g�pG.DEP'f• � � TEL.: 765•1802 �py,�N OF 80 Examined . .c7�!�.�!. .z�. ., 19�� Received . . . . . . . . . . . , 19 . . APproved . �I.�.�.G.,Y. . z3. . ., 19�'. Permit No. l`�./ 5�,� I .��,�.Q� L^�:� . Disapproved a/c . . . . . . . . . ---�— ,� -��-C� ",-� . . . . .� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ��' -�_ __-- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Building Inspector) APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date . . . . . . 7��Z . . . . ., 19 S: INSTRUCTtON3 a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector, with sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public stree or areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this apF cation. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Such per�r shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupan� shall have been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to t Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein describc The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. � �- S'UE /�fINl�u£,��,��y; .�AFrL,F, r �� (Signature of applicant, or name, if a corporation) �01 l�t701�Q!JS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .��.�yl?�43 �•/GSSC j !/7c�/ (Mailing address of applicant)�� State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, azchitect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or�bdilde � . . . LG'it: iic�A�7 � VErI�"DF'f- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Name of owner of premises f.��!�'?=.NCt_� :S7Er'//Eit,'.Sp� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (as on the tax roll or�latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Name and title of corporate officer) Builder's License No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plumber's License No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " Electrician's License No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O[her Trade's License No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ��U�,� L Location of land on which proposed work will be done. . . S�L�. �Or/�� 4( lr��oGIS'2 �� d �o , r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L i�'r��. ..Q c/�LJ�i�° c�Gy��o/r� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ouse Number Street Hamlet t"`" County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . . . . : .<�. . . . . . . . B1ock . . . . . .�p, . . . . . . . . . Lot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ----- _ Subdivision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Filed Map No. Lot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Name) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy V��n'�r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Intended use and occupancy . . . . . .'S./��/E' fQ�N'� vPSr,�'eh. . . . . . . . "�1 . . . . . . .`, . . . . . . .^.i. �?—;. . . . . ,,�t. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � � ,. - -- � . ,�:nsd < � � � �Gut..�.�1 I �u." JAMES BITSES, KATHERINE BITSE - ` FLORENCE RIEFF, STEVE ALDI, L`'tiiD i �� OBJECTO7 � � �,� � TO: � � � � THE PLANNING BOARD � 5�l�� ` ' TOWN HALL � MAIN ROAD � SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - `C'v' � - S IRS: � PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that it has come to our attention that two applications have been made for minor subdivisions on the westerly side of Lighthouse Road near the intersection of Soundview Avenue in Southold. (See Map #1 , made part hereof) I Application #1- Minor Subdivision of Sue Hanauer and Joan Sagley (two lots) Application #2 - Minor Subdivision of Too Bee Realty Corp. (four lots) ' �- 1. We object to the granting of these subdivisions for the fdllowing reasons: Both proponents Hanauer and Bagley and Too Bee Realty are one and the same., using the fiction of two legal entities to + circumvent the Statutes requiring that subdivisions of five or more lots must comply to the requirements of a major subdivision. -1= _ � '� 2- The map filed by Hanauer and Bagley is in error as to the extent of water covering their subdivision. An examination of the filed map (Map #i herein) shows the pond waterline on the easterly side of the parcel ciosely paralleling the 55 foot contour. The � waterline on the left side of the pond is purely imaginary and ' diverges radically from the 55 foot contour. (See enclosed Map #1) As shown on Map #1 the failure to report this condition is a majcr underrepresentation which a field inspection will disclose. ' i 3- Both proponents (Too Bee and Hanauer and Bagley) maintain an I illegal dam at the boundary between the two minor subdivisions. i (See Green line on Map #1) This dam masks the fact that there I is a marshy area in the northwesterly corner at the Too Bee subdivision (Shown in red on Map #1. This is a major ' underrepresentation. 4- Both proponents have erected a dam as aforesaid which is blocking the normal flow of ground water and causing the same to back-up and inundate the properties of Bitses, Rieff and Aldi to the north, contrary to Southold Town Statute Sec. 82-2A. � This is a major underrepresentation. 5- The erection of this dam is in violation of Southold Town Statutes Sec 82-2A; 81-6(3); 81-7K; Bl-5(1) 81-13; and 82-2A as aforesaid. The erection of this dam is unreported to the Dept of Env. Con. as required by law. The environmental impact statement filed by both minor subdivisions is fataly defective and contains major underrepresentations requiring a reinspection by both the DEC and the Southold Planning Board.,, and raises doubts j as to the bona fides of both applications. 6- On at least three occasions the dam has backed up ground waters to the extent of flooding Soundview Avenue to a depth of six inches, making it impassable to vehicular traffic and constituting a legal public Nuisance. On one occasion (as is shown in the Highway Department Records) the Highway Departm:em�t � removed the dam in order to unflood Soundview Avenue. On two other occasions the dam was removed by others to relieve the flooding at Soundview Avenue. The highway culverts have been raised twice to accommodate the overflow and are now at Soundview Avenue levei and cannot be raised any £urther. The overflow continues, the damage to adjoining upland property owners continues and 4 the situation is now .critical. -2- _ _ _ _ _ � � � 7- Many of the above objections were raised at the Public Hearing, as the record thereof will show. at which time proponents were advised of the circumstances herein. i W H E R E F O R E For these and other valid objections the j i I undersigned respectfully requests thatthe Planning Board (a) Stop all proceedings as to these two subdivisions (b) Conduct a field inspection in company with the objectors listed herein and the proponents Too Bee Realty and Hanauer and Bagiey (c) Schedule ' a rehearing before the Planning Board of both applications for minor subdivisions (d) Set �side any ana:all approvals, if any granted to proponents and withhold such approvals until such time as the serious questions raised herein have been resolved Respectfully submitted, JAMES BITSES � KATHERINE BITSES FLORENCE RIEFF STEVE ALDI MARY ALDI Objectors I -3- _ _ . _ . ^ _ _ �. ` � � � , r-�-�--_..�_.________. -°------------____ ____..------ ! ------._ __._.-----------.. ._ �1I�P __ '�.l ___ ; _ ____ � U � A• �'�l/A � . ��__y f :�' ��,7;r�'_ `1�.;' -' _ � 1 t �] �} 2 _ � �' 2a _ -� f` � �i..`f,,�; � C} r_ -�- � �J�.> �� :,`'�� f� �! i .�� i �.a �- `` � , \./ � ` � q �� ..�h� ,iti L, f F-- o ' 1 i �' ' .. _ .. - - �' � S `• , �_ ) 1 , 1 r �.�h - 6•SC i'✓ u .. . . ~ . �.l _' � _, � ,�i r , , �- �� ._ �1 "'� _ . � ..._..._� . . _ � �. ` � ��`� � � . ��71 u � � f � >� � �D v� I } O (y� �� : � � 1 . ' F�F r�C ' ` r �� ' L ' ; r �r � ��,`': .: , I �2. t.�.. - • I � ( � � . =--r a F,�� ; i � ! � � � . " ' , Qz � ' qa � i ; �y a :: ' : , . a :, ; < � � ';� . ; ` ' i �� __ ' � . � �J � n-f , � � � : - �� , , \ � � - ;y' ;, -� . . l�� f%��- i ' �-' -tl��9/i/ ;U I ( -a- :.., - � �r � �! — ___ �n�� i � � 'm -=r --- ---- - -- -, ' � [�y J �� 'n � � p ��/. � .__ .=t . � O l� � 'O u ! � � ; � f w , Q� � '.� ' _ - - - ^--�'�-.. '_:f . ZFi�.[_; , ,. :, � � � �� , � � � � ' � � v . . a� . . �; . ; : � ; � � � . . - - � _ _ _ _ _ . " i416a(9IBq * � - ` ' � ' PROIECT I.O.NUMBER • . �� NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION Of RECULA70RY AFFAIRS , � State Environmentel Qualiry Revlew SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I ProJect Inlormatlon(To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) . 1. Appli<an�sponsor 5�B H a n a u e r & J o a n B a g 1 e y Z, Project Name � David E. Kapell , as agent same 3. Project laation; � - M°^'�'P��h' S o u t h o 1 d � ca��N S u f f o I k � �. Is pronposed action: . . w N�"' ❑ EMwnsion ❑ ModiHntionlaltention � � . 5. Descri6e project briefiy: - — � - Applicant proposes to set-off a building lot of 2 .497 acres from a parcel of 4 . 945 acres . 6. Precise iocation(road inhnections,prominent landmarks,etc.or provide mapJ . � �-� - Southwest corner of Lighthouse Road & Soundview Avenue , Southold , N . Y . . 7. Amount of land affected: -- - -- � Initialfy d 9 a 5 acrcs Ultimately d Q a F acres L. Will pmposed action comply with ezistina zoninQ w pther existin{land use restrictions7 � - - - QYes ❑ No If No,describe brieFly 9. Wha[is Drcsent land use in vicinity of projecti -- - � � Residential ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Agri<Wture ❑ Parkland/open space ❑ Other " ' Describe: -- � 10. Does action involve a permit/apP�owl,or funding,now or ultimately,fmm any other Qovemmmtal agmcy�Federal,state or Iotal)t � � Yee ❑ No If ya. liat aeency(s)and permi�aPProvals . S . C . D. H. S. Article VI (pending ) 11. Does any aspect of[he action have a currmtly wlid permit a approvalt - - ❑ Yes � No If yes,list agency name a�permit/approvai type 12. As result of proposed action will esisting Oertniyapprova�require modi(ication7 � _ ❑ Yes � No I CERTIFV THAT THE INFORMATION VROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Sue Hanauer & Joan Bagley �ovGcanVs name: ��Lj_(�_.. � K a n a 1 1 � a c a n c n+ / �/R 7 ' (((�� ^'�� Date: SiQnature: `\� Q � It the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER _ . � � � , _ `�S�F�UI.� P �, �� D T � ` s:, � LD 3 ,,�1� �Y 1 :�. � Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 28, 1987 Mr. David Kapell Kapell Real Estate, Inc. Front Street Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Hanauer and Bagley set off Dear Mr. Kapell: The above mentioned proposal was reviewed by the Planning Consultant, David Emilita. Based on this review, a Long Environmental Assessment is requested to be filled out. Enclosed is a Long Environmental Assessment Form £or you to fill out and return. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truiy yours, �s2i'l.►1Q.�.. �l�.bk).��(.�.,�-�-�,�, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PI,ANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary enc. -,��--_..�_ ��_. : �� . , _�r_._�,,,��_ � __.. � �.F, � � �i�.ak�r� �.gle� �t U�.��.or S�.,��- I tc� � �eSSs � I�, �?�� l �1 �� , � . 1 .� • , j ',, �r�.sed�.a �t� ��s�r� t� es�r�• 1�� s c�� '� a.,�,d a. � { s►.,.bd�r` ' � , t�. p �� Pi� ��'' ' � ' fP� �.�i'�� l'��b �. ;�� , ,; '�! ,��` �`�'r'r` a P�t'°''`a' G�'�'s ti�l�''►s'c'"''�p �.g. (a��l . !,'; e�2a�f .Q,c ��ua,++�U. �c.Jc�Gr� .�tcc�,;� J 1 ' �'; Gorsl�r o� -� tu�,ss 4 cor►, �.�.�t.,r' j� �1� �'}7�1I� Sd�l G S�!��j h t�.�/l 2w� �LZ'i Uy� . ,,. -� �✓ a..� so c� w►Zl �¢ Gl se�..,�tc ��' r; . ';;rn. �,e �,.�►rak w�.�,.-!�: �i;s►� � '�l u� F.�.� (�e f��¢. � ar,.e eL.�Q I�� os l.tt+.� � S1 � .2 �'' � � � y ��; ��' ' r �, d �,u.s re.¢. �' r..�u ,r� ' �,. f {a � � ,�� ,, ;�� f� ` 4`c�7,�.��t`ts ,,, , . � �n41J�Q.�j.�,QL. t►� V�.'�IIPw�. uwo�,� i: �Ibv�� .,�1 �� rh�L z4 C.�'rQ�.�a�.��,,��l,�1 s> t� �rP�,' '' �,. �e�.�� s�' . li; 010 �-�F -�d�,c2d �lt� �l o�ut�Q, c� �,/ � �� u��c i i ,�? m�... . a„��.�ti..*are,� l u1e� a�..-�lt�►,�s � � �,,te�'l.«�.ds�, l�.s�- c�,1�8 0-,�.�1Pw,s G„�Q c-a�,sy'c�l',¢�L l da,.t, � • � `� ij;�� ;i. , . _ ;' "� �as �� 1« �,�.�..� c��.l �. ��,� �� : _- - __ - -- - - _. .,�.,,�..�.�..� _.,n,. .: _ ...,.,.—��—. —,-�-_,..—..__-__---�,�—,-�w ws � • O a�,�� sQ�>61� °�#'a G�ms�s� Jecr►a.,� G��2 ti1�SDQS Loa��"cl h( Q,(� du,,,,, (re U.ocess . �� s � � t.J� f�t u��.�1 �a..�{-o�� -�' (,�. . �a.�� ,'_ogs�..�ac.fit�., ( �� 't� o�c�.�,r �dlN�► � Q..I G�►� I �� a`► � '��J�r� � �tGQ S�. �a � d , � '� �" _ , � ---- _ _ . � � 5�2qI�7 KAPELL REAL ESTATE, INC. � 10 Flanders Road Riverhead,New York 11901 (516)369-0044 400 Front Street Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-9403 21 NoRh Ferry Road She@er Island,New York 11964 (516)749-3030 Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. Chairman , Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold , N . Y. 11971 May 23 , 1987 Dear Mr. Chairman : I enclose herewith on behalf of my clients , Sue Hanauer & Joan Bag- ley , an application for a set-off of property they own at the southwest corner of Lighthouse Road & Soundview Avenue , Southold , N . Y . Please note that this application replaces the application which you have had pending for a lot line change on the same property . My clients have instructed me to withdraw the request for same . I have attached to the set-off application a copy of a letter from the Southold Town Board of Appeals concerning the subject property and the Town of Southold s new position regarding wetlands which exist on the site . Thankyou for your assistance in advancing the project and please no- tify me as to how I may assist the Board in its review. incerely , :�.�� David E. Kapell as agent _ _ _,�,,_,_ _ _ _ _ . _ � � .4ddendum Set-Off Application Sue Hanauer & Joan Bagley 1 . Tax map # 1000-50-6-4 2 . There are no existing restrictions which apply to the subject property. 3 . Adjoining property owners : 1 . TooBee Realty Corp . 2 • Ivan A. & Danica A. Kitanof 3 . Genevieve Sepenoski _. __ : • ! APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision platin accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Reg�lations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. Thenameofthe subdi�iSionistobe . ,Sue, .Hanauer . &. .Joan B,agley , David E. ICapell , es agent ' "' � " " . .. .. .... .. .. . . .. . . ... . .. .. . .. .. ... .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber . .. .. .. 9842.. . . . . . . .. . Page . .. .. .. . .598. . . . . . .. 8/ 1 /85 . On . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : Liber . . . . . . . . . . . .. ........... Page . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . On . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; Liber . .... .. .. .. .... .. .. . . .. . Page . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. . On . .. .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . .. . ; LiUer . .. . . .. . . . . .. .... ...... . Page . .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. . On . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . : Liber . ...... .... .. ........... Page . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . On . .. . . .. . . .. . . ... . .. .. . . ; as d'evised under the Last Will and Testament of . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .... . . . . .. .. . . . . . ... or as distributee . .. .. .. .... .............. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. . . . ... ... . . . . .. ...... .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. ................... . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . ..... ... . . . . 5. The area of the land is . .. . .4..94�. .. .. . acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except . . . .. . . .. , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. ....... ..N:A... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . ... . .. .. . . . . . 7. The ]and is encumbered by . .. .N.A... .. .. . . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . . mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. .. . . . . . . . Paqe . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . in original amount of $. . . . . . . . . . . .. . unpaid amount $ . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held b y . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . address . .. ...... ... . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. .. .. . . Page . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . in original amount of . .. .. . . .. . . . . . unpaid amount $. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . held b y . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . address . .. .:.. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . _ _ _ �. . � � ` (c) Mortgage recorded in Libet . . . .. . . . . .. .. . Page . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . in original amount . of ... .. . . .. . . .. . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. . held by . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. ....... . .... .. . . .. .. .. . ... .. . address . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . ... .. . . .. . . . . .. . 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except . . . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. . . .. ... ... . . .. .. .. .... . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . N:.A. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ..... . .. . . . ...... .. . .. ... 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts .A-A J r}C�I 1,Y��I,r 1],-f;��,1�2 fl t� d,l , . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . .. . . .... . . ..... . 10. No part of the land lies under ��ater whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex• �ept . . . .. .. .,as. .shown_ .on survey.. attached . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . ..... .. .. ... . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (�jq(,J�) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 13. Water mains will be laid by . . . ..N./�.. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . N .A. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. .. .... • • • •• •• •• • • • • •• •• •• • • •• • • • • . . . .. .. . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made forinstalling said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by . .. N,.A. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets sho�vn on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land �vhich are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Wliere the plat shows proposed streets W Il1CI1 are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing.maps� at �their conjtmctions �vitli the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant �vill oifer proof of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Property Law. 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showin� all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annes Schedule "D". ' . : ' � 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will Ue $• •• •• •• •. . as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . .. .. .. .. .. . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". Sue Hanauer & Joan Bagley DATE ..... ..... . .... MdY.. .. .. .. . . ., i9.$7. . .. .Da.�i.d. .E.. .Ka.Re.11.,. .a.s. .a9ea�. ... .... . ( f Applicant) r By . . .. . . .. .�C..X!�:�;��'��.�Qp� (Sig ture and Title) .1 — �� . . . ,P,.O.Box . 463,, . Green.port,,, . N,;Y_., . ,.11944 (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . .. . . . . . . .S.Uf,f,Ol.k. .. . . .. .. .. .. ss: .2 � On the . . . .. .. � day of. .. .. . . .. . . .. .May. . . . . . .. .. ., 19. $�. ., before me personally came . . D a y i d. E.. K a p e 11.. . . . , to me known to be the individnal described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . . .h2. . . .. . executed the same. �� .. .��,�.�- . .. . . .�.. .. ... . Q�� otary Public � STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . .. . . ss: On the . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . day . . . .. .. .. . . . of . . . . . .. .. . . . . ., 19. .. .. ., before me personally came • • � � • • . . . . . ... . . . . . to me kno�vn, who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . .. .. . . .. . . . resides at No. . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . that . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . is the . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . of . . . .. . . . . .. ..... . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tlie corporation described in and which execnted the foregoing instrument; that . . . .. . . . . . . , knows tlie seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. :in�l tliat . . . . . . . . . . . . signed . .. . . .. .. . . .. . name thereto by like order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. .... . Notary Public __ .. , , � � Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Set-Off Application of Sue Hanauer & Joan Bagley David E. Kapell , as agent Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads. (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. Yours truly, � c�.�,� �� David E. Kapell as agent . _ __ .__ , _ _ _ ___ , ��aER 9842 ��599 � � fTAT! Of N!W tORK, COYNTI� O� SUFFOLK • fft fTAri O� NtW YOtK, COYNTY O� fft ' On ehe 26{h day of July� 1985 � �fore me On the day oE 19 , before me personally came personally came LAWRENCE W. ST�PHENSON to me knawn to br the individiwl described in and who to me known to be the individual deacribed in and who executrd the forcgoing instrumrnt, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. executed the same. �� Notary Public AtR7iQMY 8. TOHpiI, ' tl037lIAY PPlBJC.6<ab o(Rf�w YeeL � . r�. 'M o^a'itjn , . ..h,, d . ��':F r'.:.u,.•v � — _—�_._�. ._ � . . . .,.�.:�5 94. 10� � . � "-----'._,_. . ..-- — .__ _,...,.. _ a-V!1�LA"4�C_�'f--- -..__ . . ��.-,.�.��....–�__.......,4.,...—.....�_._. .. �. ss. • ___ . __._ _ ... TY OF SCTFFOLK ) . STAT! O� NtW YOl1I, COYNTY OP fS: �n the 26tkt day of Jul 1965 � �hO �Y °f 19 , before me *e me ' ' P�r%�ally pme personally came �oe . Ste�nsCn the aubscribing witness to the foregoing instrumrnt, with = known to be the individual described in whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly :Ha, executed the foregoing instnnnent and awom, did depose and say that he naides at No. _= known to be the attorney-in-fact of • �i.J. StiepileriSari the individual(s) �hat he'knows ' 'ibed in, and who, by said attorney-in- executed the same, and acknowledged that described in and who executed the foregobng n trument� :ecuted said instrument as the act and that he, said subscribing witnesa, was present and saw of said SUsati J, S� execute the same;md that he, said witnas, rtue of a power of attorney dated at the same time subncribed h name as wiMess thereto. I_y 18� 1985 and intended to be ded simultaneously herewith. � 1�' "� _._. � ---- �AM'A+�►fY-3S.it]rQTs _ - �. . AO7JL7fY FVllS.14^,9ttrt• oi N�w Yae! � Xa ��l410iS10 � � � . � Qea11F�d!a 8•.illo1!Co�tqtp . , - p► �. • •+/�:=r�,'_.� Mmeh 9B. 1�Y�i �.. � � � � --...�,�,_.�...z., .i., -«.�. _ ._ r .. . ' . . . _ ` -.�_:.�__.. � _-_•__ '- . . . . ._ .,_.__�.__ . �Q�itt �tt�t �►M[P �PP�1 , NI7H CpyENANT AGAINSC GRANTOR�3 ACfB SEG710N � � � -e No. S'� c�i /O ��,�', acocK '' � LAWRENCE N. STEPHENSON LOT �fa LAWItENCF,�,�7. STEPHENSON et al, � COUNTY OR TOWN � �. HANAUER & JOAN BAGLEY � lternrded at uat d E.. � . .. E INSU��L.�Q� f . _ ` i -.NO�RD FORM OF NEW YORK lOARO OF TIiLE UNOEPWRITERf �yrp � �� ' : Distributed by � ' WICKHAM, WICKHAM & BRESSLER, ° CHYOA80 TITLi ESQS� �1psi7itANCa COulPA11�7C Main Road - PO Box 1424 Mattituck, NY 11952 Lp xo. A1Nl�O� z��'� �1 V7'F3�l��1��"�f.. � � sa�wa � z I �n � ti3t]Ho��li f � . � �FORM NO. 1 t r�i�� `�� ." ___.� TO�NN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT � , Z� TOWN HALI ✓ 90UTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 g�p6.pEPT• � TEL.: 765-1802 �1N Of Examined . .c7.�1�.�!. . z�. ., 19�� Received . . . . . . . . . . . , 19 . . � � .�/�r""., Approved . <I.�,�.L.�! . z-3. . ., 1�Permit No. l�/ 5�, �� ' Disapproved a/c . . . . . . . . . . . . . .� . . . . . . . . . . . . "��:�(.C/ ��,'�- � . . �---- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Building Inspector) APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT ; Date . . . . . . 7/��: . . . . ., 19�: INSTRUCTIONS a. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector, with sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public stree or areas, and giving a detailed description of layout of ptoperty must be drawn on the diagram which is part of this apF cation. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of BuIlding Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issued a Building Permit to the applicant. Such perrr shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate oF Occupan� shall have been granted by the Building Inspector. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to t' Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Iaws, Ordinances Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions or alterations, or for removal or demolition, as herein describe The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. � .�� S'c�E .NN�t/�u��e�.��✓ ,�A��:F� T (Signature of applicant, or name, if a corporation) '�01 lc�t'TOI�!?US . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .y.�'`r. .Cc'trl�43 �•/GSst% !/r9i (Mailing address of applicant)�� !�� State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contraetor, electrician, plumber or b il e , _ ��.CiL� %%�HC�% CE�ti��Jf�<=.- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A[ h'f- iVC'f_ �57Ei'//EiL�.SO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Na�ne of owner of premises :.- . . V . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !� (as on the tax roll or�latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Name and title of corporate officer) E3uilder's License No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plumber's License No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Electrician's License No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Trade's License No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / ' � �.��:( 1. Location oF land on which proposed work wilt be done. . . �1!�L. . �Q�� l��o�P x`�. d `�o`�" . . . . . . . . .�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L;F�,<<., . ,,4 t�e.c��c�:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ��o.l�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . }iouse Number Street Hamlet � / County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . . . . : _<�. . . . . . . . Block . . . . . .�7 . . . . . . . . . Lot . . . . . . . --------__ Subdivision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Filed Map No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Name) 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use aud occupancy I�QC�7 oi�' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b. Intended use and occupancy . . . . . .5��/E'. .fa.�7'.'/`� `pS�tA?�'l�'�-..- ,• �`'M ,- . . . . . . .--- . . . . . . .,• ^� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i 3. Nature of work check which a licable : New Buildin L�� PP ) . . . . . . . . . . �.ddition . . . . . . . . . . Altaratiot� Repair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Removal . . . . . , . Demolition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . g . . Other Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . :��S � � . . . . . . . 4. Estimated Cost . . . . . . . . . l�0 �� ,�t // � (Description) .` . . . �. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fee . F� . .T`�/ . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' ��`�='� `' �to be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling, nuinDer of dwelling units . . . . . . �, . , , , , , . Number of dwelling units on each floor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . If garage, number of cars . 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front . . . . . . . . . . Height . . . . . Rear . . . . . .--. . . . . Depth . . .:-:.-. . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • . . . . . NumberofStories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front � � � � � � � � � ' ' ' ' Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Height . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front S�'�, R_��RearNumber of Stories • � th . . .. . . . . . . . . . HP�ght . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • P . . . . , . . . . . . . . . Number of Storics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. Size of lot: Front '` ! . . .--�;`# . . . . �/.`.J . . . . . . Rear . . . . . . . :S./,S . . . Depth :�,� �j, , , , , !0. Date ofPurchase • • • • • . . . . . . . . . . " " " ' � • • • • • � • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . ameof ormerOwner 1 1. "Lone or use district in which premises are situated . . . . . . . . . .�' � � � � � � � � � ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' � � 12. Does proposed construction violate a y zoning law, ordinance or regulation: . .� 13. W�]I lot be regraded . . . . . . . . �. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14. Name of Owner of premises . . . .� , , , , _ , , , , , , . Addressxcess fill be removed from premises: Yes �I� Name of Architect ,1.A(✓�('/!./� ,C//�/l,�>qL�E,C� • • • • • • . Phone No. . . . . . . .�/ . C , • • • . Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Phone No.(�92:. Y.�. .y. , Name of C:ontractor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Phone ThD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PLOT DIAGRAM Locate clearly and distinctly all buildings, whether existing or proposed, and.indicate all set-back dimensions froi property lines. Give street and block number ot description according to deed, and show street nwnes and indicate whetl�� interior or corner lot. _��' c. �x .��rt r �i<<.� STATE OF NEW YORK, � COUNTY OF . . :I:f.F,�!f; , , , S.S . . . . . . . . . f�l,� .�;/ .9. ��;',,�lia� . �'' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' � �• • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the applican (Name of individual signing contract) above named. He is the . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . . . . . �. .�'Yrl?+ �(p;::. �¢�,�2?!'?��'iC :COCf�'.��.� l . . . . . p tractor;��ent, corporate officer, etc.) � � � � � � � � � � � of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file thi application; that all state�reents contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief;and that th� work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application fled therewith. Swom to before me this � i%� � ; ., i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�,-i. . . . .dayof. . . . .tc� *) . . . . . . . ., 19 .�5— . . . . . . / / Notary Public, . . . . . . . . . . ' /� .�;1 .�. , , , , , , , County /, � � . . . . � . .. . �l16LEN K DE YOE � ,.�� ... . . . . . . . . . . �YP�BIIC.SI+te � . . . . . . . . . .4�' -( e°i 1' Na iA1618,Suf13� . Tr�Eaqr�i� � (Signaturo of applicant) _ �� .�� (/e� _ _. , . _ _ . � ER9842 P�598 - /(j SunAatd N.Y.B.T.U. Porm BOpq—ypb —g��in ami 5�1e Dsed�wi�h�vmanu�pim�Gmm�r'�An�— ' . _ CONSULT rOYR LAWI'ER�prpR�SIQ�NIN6 THIS INfTRYM�NT.'��S INSTRYMlNT fNOYLD��[Uf 0�T LANry{ V THIS INDEN7VItE, made the 26tH day of Jul gg�E� Y , ninetem hundred and eight X'� LAWRENCE �. STEPHENSON zesiding at 2241 West Monona STEPHENSONenresiding�at 13627Wa1denSRo d,JWalnut �y � Creek, California 94596 . party of the 6rst part,and SUE HP,NAUER and JOAN BAGLEY, as tenants in common, 149 residing at 2 The Hollows, Syosset, New York 11791, . and 95 Cypress Drive, Woodbury, New York 11797, respectively, party of the second part, or�WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable conside- uccessoers and assihes af he�rt, does hereby gnnt and rdease unto the party af the second part, the BT� party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, pieca or parcel of Iand,7WGW�K� lyingandbeing�a at Hortons Point, Town� Sou�hold, County of Suf and State of New York, bounded and descri�be�d��a�s p�o� t�it, BEGINNING at a corner formed by the intersection of the westerlj side of Lighthouse Road with the southerly side of Soundview Avenue; RUNNING THENCE along the westerly side of Lighthouse Road, Souti DISTRICT 41° 11' 00 East 419. 04 feet to land now or formerly of John McGuire; 1gQQ THENCE along the northerly line of land now or formerly of John McGuire, South 48' S'S' 10" West 456. 94 feet to the easterly line SECTION of land now or formerly of Genevieve Sepenowski; THENCE along the easterly line of land now or formerly of Genevi I 050. 00 Sepenowski, North 42° 15' 20" West 515. 04 feet to the southerly , side of Soundview Avenue; �p�K THENCE along the southerly side of Soundview Avenue North 60° C 31' 30" East 476.50 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING. 06. 00 . _.�._ _.�________ .----�-� _.. . _�.._,,._- BEING and intended to be the same premises conveyed to the parti= LOT of the first part by deed dated 1/8/73, recorded in _the Suffolk County Clerk's Office on 1/8/Z3,� in Liber 7318, page 454. 004. 000 There has been executed and intended to be recorded simultraneousl � herewith a purchase money first mortgage from the grantees herein S'1'4S to the grantors herein in the original principal sum of $40,000. 0 ,,s.;m*+>+� i �� t,� ?��a � . � TOGETHER with all right, tiHe and interest, if any, oE the party of the 6rst y roads abutting the above described premises to the centrr lines thereof; TOGETHEk with the appurtenance= and all the estate and rights of the party of the first �n in and to an streets an� �, HOLD thc premis�s herein granted unto the �n �n and to said premises; TO HAVE qND Tc_ �he party of the second part forevec �rty of thr c�ond part, the hrirs or successors and assigns o; I � � AND the ,£ - ' .y party of the first part mvenants tliat the party of the first pa�t has not done or suffered anythin� whereby the said premiy�g have bem rncumbered in any way whatcveq exeept as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Srctiorz 13 of :he Lien I,aw, �o�•enants that the party of ihe first part wiil receive the cw�sideration for this mmeyancn and will h01d the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to 6e applieti first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and wil!appIy thr same first to the paymmt of thc cost of the improvement before using 8ny part of the total of the same for 1 ) any otha purpose, � � The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the smse of this indentpre so requires. \ IN W�Fgg �yHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed tliis deed the day and year first abova writtm. . � IN PiEggNCE OP: R�CFI ED ' �� . ! y � ; a.... :�I�S�--� •, ' � �: � REAL E3TqTE' , � .: �-� ' . ' ! AOG I i965 nc,ro�.�,..� � � n• �inrrtENSON a�nce r i �e�henson � 1 � TRAI�SFER T � -�"'� ��a�` � � SUFFpLKAX . SUSAN ,7, g EPHEN 0 �Y�w��_—_.�`_''_'� Ste henson as att by Lawrence W. Q,p ., � COUNTY P qrney-in-fact _ _ _ � ... Ol�a= _ __ _ __ _�--�--- _..a-�-.�.�- . _ . , . k}..'. . • - � � . ♦ � . . ?�� rIC�� . ..I • .. .. � �� .. I. . � . • .. �k._: �.. ' . . � - .. . . ,:Sie . . � � . . . .l'' ' .. � . . . � � . . � . � . 3� �•..'_ . " .. . ' ' � . . . ' .. � �:� � �� .. ., - � . , _ . ' ��_ - �� 38MES SITSES,� KATE3ER��7E� BIT�ES � ` �� FLORE�TCE RIEFF, S�'EVE. A1.,D�, MARY AL.DI �� I�bt1° t�'"�:0'u �'' AY 1 � 198� „- � _ ' OBJECTORS �aa,r�' - ,, , , . ,,. .., . ; ;: . ,y,, , } y;=� � ;, ' TO: _ ,. 'i<:t.: x _;, ,,.: „,:.y *°`+v� THE Pi,ANDiING BOA$D T'dVdN HA�.L •z�' MAbN ROAI7 �''� SOUTHO�,1�, N. �. 1]J71 ,.,- ti� � � � � � � � � � :� _ _ ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X , S IRS: . `. "'� PL��.��ISE 1�'1"TCE that` it ha�-,come.to our,attention that �;. • �,, two appli:catioris ��ve bee� m3de for minar Subdivisions on the ' �",� � �' � . �„'" westerly side of L,ig3athouge Ii�[i�.ti,�ear the ir�t��ectfion of Sound�izw : : , �.� , .. - Auenue in Southold �e 3VIap #1 ' ��' part hereof} ,,, �� Application #I- ,1Vli.twr SubdavisitirY of Sita Hanauer and Joan Hagley' (two lots) . ; . ' , w• . ..: - , , "�, _ Ap�lice,�ion .#2 - Minor ��bd3'vision of Too Bee ,�,ealty Cdrp. u;<�";'� � (four lots) '�-;?ry .ix L[�? Pbject tn t17e ,g�a�S#a:ng of these subc3ivisions for the I ,'.,` i 4 rw+ ` 'f�,lowing reasons: _ ,. Both praparnenxs Ha.�auer. and Bagley axid Tbo $�e gea7.t�• �e' � : one and the same„ ,ta9ing, tT�e fj.Ct3an o€,taso lega,l entities to ' ��;., „ .�� circumvettt:the Sta'hate�,rec}uiring that sabdic�fsions of fi�e or � � more lots znuet comply �o the requir�xnents of a major '�E , sub8ivision. . �_ , , � ,.; � � -�'" � .X�%�, � � � .;.t� '' � l � � � . :; � � ��` � �� .� � . � w�c _ �'� _,_ ��,: ; �� .. r � � � � � � , � � .-�� :_____._. �:� _ , �....��...-o- ��.�-�� . � .-�. � . . • � r . � • . ' . . . . . 2- The map filed by.$anauer and Bagley.is in error as to the extent of water covering their subdivision. An eX2mination of the filed ' map ��Ulap #1 herein) +sk�ows the pond waY.�rline on the easterly sid'e of �he parcel' cLos�ly:parai�.elir�g;the 55 foot contour. The ;;waterlin,e on tHe left sirle of the pond is purely imaginary and diverges radically fro'm the b5 fbot contour. (See enclosed 1VIap #1) . i As shqwn on n(�ap #1,tk�e failure-to report this condition is a i ' ' majcr undP�e�re�ehtation which a Eield inspection will disclose. � 3- �Botti proponents -(.Too �Bee and ffanayer and Bagley) maintain an I illegal:d�xn at the.boundary between the,two minor subdivisions: - ' - (5'e�- Gre�n-line on Map #1) This da,m masks the fact that ttiere is a mars�y ar6a in the northwest�r�y corr�er at the Too Bee subdiuision (Shorun in red on Nia� #1. This 3s a major underrepresentation. 4- Both proponents'have ere�t�:�-a dart2 as. 8foresaid which is ' blockixig the normai flow of,ground water ar�d aa�zsing the'same to back�;up and inundate the properties ;of Bitses, Riet'£'and Aldi tc� tl�e north, cqntrary to Southolc� T'own 9tiatute Sec. 82-2A. Thig is a major.underrepresentatiort.' 5- The erection of this dasn is in violation,of Southold Town Statutes Sec 82-2A; 81-6(3); ��-71{; 81-5(1I 81-I.�;, aad �2-2A as afor�s2id. - The erection of tYais dam i5 unreported to the Dep#,of Env, Con. as requirgd by lau�. The envirorimental,! ixr�pact statement , filed by ijoth minor aubdidisions is�at�Yy defective and contains majAr utiderrepresent�tions' requiring a reinspection`by bo�th: t the DEC and the.�ou,thold Planriitsg Board.,, and raises . 8otxbts � as to the bo�a fides of b'oth applicatio�ts. 6- On 2t least three occasions the dam has backed�i#p ground waters { to. the extent.of floodirig Soundview Avenue to a depth of six inches, rtiaking if ixn�assable to v�hicul2'�° tratfic. and congtti.tutin�`` � a legal public Nuisance. 9Dn one occaszon (as is"shown z� �te Highway :Department �,ewords) the '�Iigh�vay ,D"epartx�3� removed the da� ir� order to unflood $�undview Av�nue. On two 4ther occasions the dam wa5 r�tnasred by pEheps 'to ` ' relieve the flooding at Soundview Avenwe, The highway ` culverts have be�n raised twiEe ta accos}�moc}ate the _ overt7.aw and are now at Soundview Avenue level and c,annot be raiB;ed any fur,the.r, The ovexfloiw cantinues, the " � d�ri��ge.; to adjaining,upland propert�t owne�*s contznues and the situation 3s now. :C�Y�i.�,�,, _�_ � - ._., �-, �: . . _ . . . . . . � � . , � • � ' . . . . , ` � , 7- 1Vlany of the above objec't4o�ls were raised at the Public Hearing, as ihe record' thereof will show. at which time proponents were advised`of the circumstances herein. I � I W H E Ft E F O R E For these and other va:lid objections the � I � underaigned reap2ctful.ly requests tHat tlre<Planning Board {a) Stop all � proceedings aS to these two subdivisions (b) Conduct a field I I � inspection in company,with the tSbjectors Tiste<3 hereim and the � � j proponer�ts Too Bee Realty and Haaauer �.ud Bagley (c) Schedule _ a rehearing before the Planrii3ag'Bv��d of both applications for �. minar subdivisio�Ss (d) Set �side att�:anakaall approvals, if any granted f ' to proponents and withhold suCh' approvals until euch time as 'the � _ I ', serious questions raised herein have been resalved " , � ; �.; � ; . , � R tfuTly swb eM"'-�-� AMES BTTSES' . , _ KA7.'H�RINE=�3��SE S ,j FL�RENCE . RIEFF � STE VE 1�Y�D� _ , ' , ,NIARY AT:;DI - . Objectors i , �, ,, : , . . . . . .. _ ' , , +r. . . . .. . . . . . �. �� . . . . ..:� . .. �. .., ` . . � � . . ... . �, ,. � � . . . . . � �s� ..� . .. . . . . . �, .. i . ' ' . . . .� ' ..'.. ... � ':. . . .<_ .... , � � .. . . :�_ . � :.::�c ^ ...,, , :,. . . . _ . .' _ - . ...d:..A . c . . � l . . . . _. . �..._ . .��i�,. ��4� . . 1 . . _. I �d r f{ � i�� f� � , .1 n-�. sl't�_''�'♦ 11f � I . y• � } : �♦ \ _' ,�'� � � w . . ;..� �t: � , � . , �� ..,. ' _ ^ � � � ' . 3'9: �.. � �� \ . .". �P'.. � T. ' � ' �=� 1 '� y �,� �. � � i` �l�� di p� '3 T'' ��i_, � 0. ' '� l� � �a �� °�� .. �I' T - � �.<, ,��. ..i -s� �'� n ' ' h _ �� , � >'.. � �I+� � , � �� '� Yr, 11'"' s- •� 1 @'� '� �, � � �'�,� I k`t �l. ' a. "� ' r� . � � , � �I � �":y�r- � ' �.��+* � ��:1 '�� ' �- a '; t s �;: ' 'i 1 ` t�s k." � • xt* u ,�uT` � i� . ; � , . s � � - r _ i r � y��` � ; "� 2 � '' : ` t � �� `�'� _.r.. :. � � ` . '�'� �- .��' � �� ,. „ 4 �4y4��i � O/y\ l� �.- `�� 'ki'� � W � .y� �g� t� '� � ; 1 �'h y ' ,�`7 �.��e J� �Xw� 7s r M' Y� 'Y' ��t � r,. � �. _,,,,... .. a ' f '``/3 =�' „' � .��i f `��et 'A C� � ` ', �' .� � � 6 ^ .. A,� 4 S � ' . ,; '"1`" .. .. •4 � F' - w°�"� .i� � ." . /,y!��ly. , -.,3:+ � � �• �'*�," ��, �JY �� +�'� Y � /�''% �I . :N � ��.�� I � rc - X . / �� ., j ' . . ./ � .� l� �, l� ��I �` �.. � � .� �� : � �� , � . ; �- � � .,� � � �.l KT'- .a '� �? �, � ` ~ ; ' � f � 'r ' ,%��s ,� �� Y � �� P"� j� ::��"�+ . '� i:i` / � � �� .�kq �C��. �� '� A . � � `'`� � �-.S r , . � � A�y J • /�' � ��y� � `�J � •r�� f .� �� en 'k �y�,-_ w _� '� r !�� A� . L!+' �F t _ ! !' f.r �. �� ` a. ,* � �o ; � i r' . ��I � .. }�:. ti � _ iRF �..?_ ��. i ,� : �� „� __ __ . __. . _ _ . • ' � , � � �` i _ t� � : . . . . . i � � . r , ...�.. { -. . .. _ ._ ,. � � t � ' (,. 1.. � . � �l ' -_/ � � _,�...� ��/...r'1�... ....i L„ .')� t t -� I . �� ..� ' . .._" _ . � � � �;�F� 4�E� ,� �t� r �,!„�Ir`��EYf � F'��' ;� : � � -� � _._ — -_ - .__-.__ _ _ _ -. ___ , �_ _ �_ ; � , ; ^ � � ._�. , . , ; ; —�_ ; I , � �� , . � e� '—,- __ ' j •✓ 4�. � _ i r �., r s s��.... � ,: I i ----� � � _ i ( —� - _ � _ «_ ' �9 _. . _. ! � ----._ ,, .1+.,�� ' - � � i , ^ " � Ur ��—:.' 6U 3�3G � , � _ _ � /r_x. ; � r�� _ , � � 1�'� � _ , � �� ', � • �'---f f-` `'� j ---'�� _.... i � `` ] 23 _ _ ` ��i Q3 >;�.. ,1L,�� __ _ y�� f . -- _ _ __ _ __ � I ,-� # �- _ _ � E .� I � (? `•L ry 1 4 . � ,_ r_ •4.'r: ' j A� I, , . ; _ . `{ i_ � � p.• 41 � � / � A� ` -,_`` � d ' �'�� 57 Cl ;r� �/ % :. � �- .--, 1 '� ti - �� _�-�� W � - r . . tda,ig -- rC _,.___ =%,.1�;�, ,, _- , .. , __ W � I J "-.� ' � �; 4 h 5�• r , +�t . . , , , , _ , h �, �� 6 �� , -. .� . _ � , � � �.d- ,'_ i ` Ati� �'� - __ _ ___.; - ; , � ( , _ ! � - �{ � �' � � _ _ , . , �� - µ p ,, � ' � � . , _ . � � � ,CTh� - �E � - � � i ',1 � � , � >[ ' ; , � � � i�� (� , , tfS � •.i;CE � � � i � � ' � FE E , ,�, i i - , � ^ ' � I ��qr.FF-` i � :. i � � : �4C. 2.7-78 AG � � � , � � , ' � ' '� , i � � I 4 � �; F1;�P ;�, , � ; � . � � w ! �� + i i ,A L � , � � � � �� J - � �� Z j `� � %' � � �i _ :t.`ti' r"iA F i � � _ { _ i1 _ __ C�j , i -- .. j ,... li7 � I�- . -! X �' . "ti�...7 � � . .. . � , _� .. ; „ � t r,} �,-� _ , -l. ' �• 1 �' � � !' � � � r , �,; � i . � . . Jc� t3.�t� r�: �,: : � , , ' : � -: ! �.,� � � ` _— _ -- ..� `�' � '(,� � i � .< <.: � . ,,. , � , , x- . � ` � ��,� ~ _ � � 1 � F � r ~. 5 � b , � � + �. !—�i�/LJ x,,yj� ! � � � � . �. � } .' �� m�s�w�e�d+u os� I ' �} :. S�,w,n 7x(X4 af thn nen vork�ID�[s I 3 I E .?' � � •, a,.t N i ;�i - &'am.&an Irve. � � • c'`�' � f . .. ' }y �� .t cavr oE nr"r s�n+r man tr.t b,.rina � / � �. —. ....•. ?��.l�3 � ::t " ; � - / ms is,c's,ervera'F int�anl or . _.____._ � � i � �}�� .....__ � .. _`3.. _._ __.__.____�„f�{ - �, � smcoaca� sentalr'ItnMbaaomidarcd � E � � ' �. �4 i � (,*} _ to be a veli^_vu.1 ao�Y• � � , {/(�� .,r_g , � [� � ... ard;rnn�t.ry�CetK v#rorn Me�urvM � � � � � � ia�s ervv rrt6 cn Mfi* naS to the , s tu cr 7V fl�vwrm-0niela!o�KYEnL � QL+. i�.+ n n+eo�lesteuna�can er�¢7 � � � � � o P�C] �?EE. flE/�L Y . f? Y �,. . � �=�cn� i�.,a�a�oc�- ! � ; � r � %l � . \�['� . z ear,Pr,not transtzrabM/ ; . .�T r1t.t:�� . x.: a:i�t ens er wleMuent � � 1 ` �` , . � �i �O � � Y ti�.t�'� w � _sJ.��d� M' t� CL�J.F`1�.�►tC .� .... � � , ! @� � . . ' � A�cc� �4Nirlt� .��F !,� ��a�.�4� ':�;�, f, ` ;. , � r � � : � � ; , . � � � �� t f, � _ - = -- -- - � �, �C a a ' 4 V�/�Tf�r.�i',-!� Y � `-�WA=�. L �.+i'+✓lLc_. ; r ` % N;`.', � . , I � :. ft � .� ,�jr �,� _ � -'•` .. , __._ ._ ... _ . --= -��--�-� pF NE � ( � � W�VL �JT�F✓Ic � �G 1 ME : � A° ��.sA('`✓`, :tr-� t ,t,_ r-/_ � ' / .�-�_ tiP�R�cK v,yN��9 � � .3�F'�F -J tiE:Yi Vf" F-{Et� i r-i .it�IG�l�`��. ! ,C, � �! G�.....� > � °j¢� ��<t � `I _— _ _'_. _'_"___ ... . __ _.. . . . _._. ._. ... ` .-, . . � �..�� , � � + _ . �. � .. '�- � �iC: F .✓ _. .., . � �. FZZo �ti'!b ;._li.. �1 :.� . . ->� � �-'. _ ._... �... ._. . . . -- t- .- ._. . .. _ CS 2c� �J . . __ _�__ . _.. .__ _ . `SF c�)P .. Nl. � ;: tvJ �,t�.x�Gu Gt�L_�r y, ^' �� dcar�c � , �. ---M._.._ �____......_....._.___._�._._._.w...�..,.. _..__..__..,....___.._..._..�...J..�.>�.. _...__ , ._ _r.._ �._._.�,�..� � �� . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . toy'r.r�. .r... . " _ . __ _ _- _ __ __ _ _ , , I POND . 1 � � � _ I � � � � � � ' - - - _ — / -�\75 \; �; �,SSOUND� e1=30.3 VIEW �,.,a� AVENUE e1=494 i l e,�s,., ��E � �� /N60°31�3 ��E / i��- --�—-----,— 48 - -- -- - - - \` � n e : z.a � 476 ^' �� \\ �• � � �� • � //� �� \ �. "'• / ce / NOTE: ]IPPROVN. SOBJECP TO V�TE1t SUPPLY � � ��—� "' �o � / / / �IS. COHI�'ORMING WIT$ STAt�IDARDS. TEST � � / � � '^ Z // ��"' � � � T�ffi.L II�ID�ATSS P88TICIDB C70NrAl�tATIOiQ. � ��. � ��\ / / � � � � �' , ° / � � y� � �I � � A . � > o lT � � ry� � � o . .�o'sm.y.O' � /y � / a° � � = r 'n o / / / . � � I p_ � �Nu � � I m� � � I � m =1 �'' � � /� � i I � _ � / � I I � �'� / � � I ^' // tc1� �� / ( � I i i m 1 � � � / i �\ POND � I I I 1� � �\ �\ f I � � �� I I 'a 1 � � � �' 1 1 �� o \\\ �� . � � \ 1 � � � . � \ � �n NEW wELL � I .._..`� \� `� � � 1� --�- _ � � � ' ��• � � � � � � � . � � `` � � �, � � � D� , � - N � � . / � \ � � A � . . � � � � . . �� '�.O�� . . • � . •. �� '� � .. ��,. ' .. . I � � . t n��' �t� � \ . - _ �_... , __�____.�. _ .�;�i,,�,,�:..� ......_._.....�.__:..__...._:,-�.,... . .._.._._. 4 � ._. . �. .. O '� / . ..`p.0 . , .. . ..,. ... . �, / � �// ` �\ \ . �T I ��/ / � �R�P . .. . � � / PR�ppSbD \ /Pp��ssP°° •y � � fµTouo� bY T�K . / e1.50•2 , � / 'o. • � �� 456•94' TESTHOLE Q / ,� HOLE LT.BPN.SANDLOAM � TE9 ��OWNe�AVfLL �� , / / sAN0,1100K �IIAOMEN79 � el:�s.� S.48og510��W• � M�G�ire � John A• 1 �oW or �O�metly TMCEGIIAVEL � 1 ezo SURVEY FOR SUE HANAUER 8� JOAN BAGLEY � SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT Of HE�ITH SERVICES AT SOUTHOLO MAR. i2, 1985 04TE� FEB. 26, 1985 FOR APPROVAL OF CONSTRUGTION ONLY 7OWN OF SOUTHOLD SCALE� I"= 60� � Q s �Q 3� SUFFOLK COUNTY� NEW YORK No. e5-2i6 � ` � HS REF. NO. r�-- M WMUTNqt12E0 �Lt[I1AilOM OR 10DITIOM ro nus �)ATE SUI1VEr 1!� VIOl�T10M OF!(CTION 7109 OF TXE NEW YORKlTATE fWC�TIOM 1111Y t U� '-.,' ^ ' M CO►IES OF TNO 0U11yEv NO7 �[MWO tX[ UNO �,1E �y J J�,/� SUIIVEY011'S IMKED lEAI 011 EM�OS7E0 7E�L 7N1LL S ♦ ♦PPROVE" ' _• ` ' M6U�MTCEl�NIDIGTCD,N[R[ON SM��LERUNv01/L`/ 10 y1r'pD W' F� O�f fIE4LTH DEPANTMENi-DATA FOR APPROM4L, TO CONSTRUC7 T� ��" FOR wNor TNE SUINEI' 13 PIIEP�RED p oG •Mo a ws scw�r m rNc n��c cownwr,aovuw- � r Z #f MWI(fT W�q YiM MI.� M30UIIC WTEI1��t�MTE �U�Lit� MENtA� AA6E[NCY�Np LEMOIMB IMSTITUTIOM 1157E0 / p II WI C0. t�7I A1M piT�QQ![CTION�M,OCK.y�g LpT�_ Mq[ON,�MD TO 1NF Af31BN[[5 Of TNf LEMOINB # Mf iM[K Al1E ND plr[LLNI{f WITMIM 100 FE[T Oi Tlllf /RO►[IITt �T��IONALu1NSTITUTWNf OIINSU�XOY[MT,��E CiTNM TMAN tNOfE fMbW1 NL11tOM. O�IME11f Mf TME WAT[11 7YML�AMDlZ1M�( q�/p�AL 7'/fTW IOIt Mlf IIp1DEMCf {�01lT�N[ff SIqON NCIICOM f110M MO�E11Tr UM[f � Y11tL CON/OIIM 70 TIIL fTAMW1IM pf TN[ fIMF0.K COYNTY O[►MTN[MT TOEKIlTIM{ �TIIVCiUR(1 YK fM � �►FCl/IC �'f�} °• 589�' CIF MtLLTN �l11vICLf. AJ►IICMIT� ►IM►OSE AMD��Ilf MOT TO �E UfEO TO EST�RIfM / '� 4 ►I�OIE11Tt �INES OR f011 TNE [11ECilON OI FEMCff ( J'�4yD SUF�� AOOREff - "` YOUNG � YOWNG �R�►+�Ao,"NEwroR E NOTE� 1.�=MONUMENT 2.CONTOUR LINE SHOWN THUS� —50 — ALDEN W.YOUNG,PROF£SSION6L ENGINEER � � 3.TOTAL AREA=4.945 ACRES � 4ND IAND SURVEYOR N.Y.S.UCENSE N0.128�3� • � rnc�oo►naar�UMl,a[►ncr�wcbtl�eqMooukr)fMwwNpe[pi HOWAROW.VOUN6, LANpSURVEYOR � r�e n�ar nno aac�rwrs wioo�an o�T�ton►or orNus N.Y.S.UCENSE NO.�SB93 � - - - --_ _._ _ __ - _- - - -___--_ � , / I - . � � o-a — � � , j � g . • ,/ --�— .-'_'��\ _`-�. � . .. —� 'r� r'+ �/ ,� .. 4( N . "s \�,�1 ~,: 1/� S� ' Y.• r��ii �, . .. '\_' ..� � . j� . r ';, $ _ � �3 i\- `��\\ � . .. e �m A O . : @y'• �� . • � �� ';� �� \ '+,;�. � ... a � � � :� � �� ' �� ,�� F ♦ `�z� �• • / ' �� 'd: ,• � \"'/ �i.. 3 . , ty - . , . . � �y➢ . ; t. � ir �D � . � . ..., a , r I 1 � f �� `// .`�_ .: �. � � F,_ �j � ` ` e '` ^1r �q:�W O . �iQOP � ti. _^ 'y 7� ie � i �J =Mi �P4. N p p'e \ .�� •O Cy � �+ . . . 04 � E '� . a , y •�.` . ,� _ . �� % y� 4 p I n� 9n ,�i .. v ' 1 . o \ ', < r ' '�r` , �, �V ::� ,'�. . /' � � x"� �° y • \ \ ' ` ` ,�. j ' , , 1 •` ' _;,� O,,> �' ' � ; ' ~4' _ 4 O ,•/ { � � /0 '4 Y • '+' \ � . .. ;� o• . i = �\ s? y yi o. �" •" � `+l � : \ : a � j� t . PON�� l. � � t � o : � , Q � �� . .. r t., i iI� �` � ' . t _ . o-o . . % p � 'Ci � .. i e . . . .\ '. � •°�� . �� 3ns� o~ � ' �-e a ! . . �.,r ; O , 'o ' '/� � f 4i - . .obs e„ � - .i � � ~ . •�J'� ,h ' liO �o ,'/�� "i. ' . t :o .i-?�- �, '' : ✓� a/��Q , „ • t t. R , ;�. ro� ~� ;�'r� �'� rl }.. �. ' � . •F. . � � i/ .� a �° t � I. . ~ .k , .F3 � -� �� ' ' � - � �'�� 1 . . � O+j''__�,� � � >� M3^ z ��/\�.%� ¢ t�,: 7 I ` �. � ` .:O ... ��/ � ' aj` r�7 ,� / / �`/ /^� .i� �� , �a ; .. . � � ,. .r / i ,�/ � /;'� _ t I " ~r.p y / , !a�,� / l•� .; .. � ON�OS \ �B2 �, + / + � v. J . . S N,S�� / / / , � I� p . . / � }, �. r R �\.. /.// \/ L� '� � o .�' �,s _ _ . . . � i �', � � ��. � ' �� . I � \ I . I � � ' J ' / i � � i� , ' -�.` II � � y"i e,' �� I 7 _ I 1 � I . . ..::1 I : Iy _�q.. i � j � � _- _..� _ . � : I ' 78]' < eS^ iti , k � 1� � II . .. �a:S .6� ./t iA r�� ._'^�� . .r�� y�.. ' �.t j�Ff.��1i-� �W�� _._____"._ .. . .uYyi; � P'k�+f(•4�y�i�,y•��.Lln�• � �.� � � . � w .,�,'F�^�'�PYY�-=.�'I.y� � =�' �Y �,,R f r �. n+c�$�T �' 1n. ) _.t... '�: ; �e. _` : " • +" '°^.7F�.�'a'T� _ � ' . � ' ._._- 1{y�rt' =, ..�� . t '.,.l�.,'t-.,„3yy�.:. ,:.. _ .. . . . r .�n ar �.'k 4 t �e% L�__Y. . ., . . .. . �.L,..�_ .v _ .. . .. . . n •. . . 1 �x; ,aa ,� .w :a:+ .1; ,-.S!r'.,�q'e+ < �.:,�c_ ;k ".a"�.," c _ ,�& ,k.w �*:, :�. -':u .s w�s-.. ��.�, �pv�_ F ��„`,�.;.. � . „ t j a `�'v r �� *4�' �`Y.- , x k' F "'�,''i.'i "h e. fi . .: : . . , .: .. . ..� . ; . z . . . -. . .. '. '.. . ' zc4%A�z-��'".qt�.,w�i,�;,, u. .�, e�� „.r '� ..aM�i'-n .' %. #e�'=Y'.c�+ l?k'rc � � ,..�.:s. �.�z � �#r�t�.kx�. .;rv'- �'..�f � 5'�, r ' ,`- . : , , 1 , � . . .�., , e ... „ e . :.. ,. . . � ,� � ''r _ §at , ,,, .-s_ . . . �.. .a�.: ' i;� . , - ,_.:,:_ .,a.r t , � °'+� �.`wa r . . ,..r... ....... : . . ..... w n., „ J.a .F , .:� „:. ...,. , y..-.. ; � 5``5 ,•>.�.,,�, �'s.,t, w.-s �+.'• 4��-`�;3 �,.^u i w :;e.A?a. - «,«t;rs e��ez'$'�5fa x'� ��,ss¢='.�.x s � ,.s. , �Q . �y - -.� . .. ..�. .., .«.- . _ .., ..�.� ., .� ..... 1.. � -.,.. ,., � K -.,' +.� .�. '°5�� 5 . . , �. .- ., � �,; � �;... �: « � x _. . . " . s c. �- .,. ..�� . .. . , . .' . ..a. . .. .. � _ _ . �.."�e w,..:.�`'� '�r 'v3� `_r, _' . , _ .v . . �e � .��v . � .. �;� , .,w.m m '� �. . - . .. . . � .a. .. . .F, . � ,« . � . . F ' m:- "+..w. � � � . .. � . . �� . . . . . � . . ' ` �. .., .. „ . �.. ,.,, - .. . . ,. {. _ . . . . . . . �V . " i . N_ 3 �� . : ` s.. .� _ . , . . . . -, � `'\ . 1 \� �� J \\ P� � \ \ 4ya \ � NO \ . � s� ` � � .r _ � _ _ � � ` ` ` o .SQ(� _ — � � • � ND - - _ , �,� _ � ` \ \ ' � � ��n N o � � _ V� .r \ � O Q 6p 3/3p'E- �E� �'ro � q / "� ` o y � �B � �4//E �: �, � o. °�" � - _ _ — so NUE ; ` �w ; � C� j� - — __ — _ s � � � i � � � , � �� g � � o g o � � / _ � a�65p ._ � � � v, °` I ' / � isBSo. _ - _ � ,., � v 4 � � //� � � . souMo ;'q�y.4 c t"�€ 0 � � / A � � o ' t ��. � V/EM' AYE � .� � N r /'� / � � ,Para � �-�-� � 1 � , �-�- � � � , � , 'S� I � � � / / � w i � � \ ° � � � � � �O i o G� � � ( j' I � � � LOCAT/ON MAP � I . + ;F� ° OO y SCALE' /�=600� � 1` r � � � �; � / � : � \ 1 / � ,� � � PO ND TNEWATERSUPPLYANOSEWi0GE0/SPoSALFAC/Ur/ESFORALLLOI�S/NTN/SDE✓ELO NTSHALLCOMPLY � I O \ :f� / :.' � � � �� 1 � W/7H THESTANDAHDSAND�OU/REMENTS OFTHES7/FFOLK COUVTj'�DEPARTMENT Of�AL7H. . � � � � �.! •, �, T � � LOT 2 _ i nl �dj,1��w.L1 (A�• ro'-'T -� — � 3'o A A=2.446` �ACRES AREA=2.479 ACRE,¢' P / i ' � I I � 1 � NOTE� /. PLAN PREPAAEO FROM SURVEYBY OTHERS � � ? � �� I 2. CONTOUq L/NESNOWNTNUS�--� 50 � Wi7SAPPROX/MAI'EOFROXIU.S.G.S CNART. ? � 3. SUFFOLK COGWTY TAX MAP' D/ST. /000 SEC7 OSO BL K.06 COT 004 ��- � I � �� . TOTAL A/7EA= 4.9�f3 ACHES ` i <D � � � l a ` I j- I I �\I _. . xe ^b � � � I � m i � �/ � I 1 �_� < � ��' � � � �� 1 j I '4 / � � . .; J � � � � � � � O � �, � �• / I 0 �3 , / � � � � M/NOR SUBD/V/S/O/V PLAN FOR ��, �' � �, �i � O SUE NA/VAUER � ✓OA/V BA6L EY � O i �O """�wy�,ureuna+oR�oomon � � / � � � � p ro nas su�ver K�vp�,�np�a AT SOUTHOL D �E oF i / 'A �°"»°°°�n�ravr rou s*�n WN OF$OUTH�LO 1�� N!�►' n � � �� , , � �� ` [DUCATION IAW. SUF , NEW YORK o:��° w �° rt i / COVIES Of THIS SURVFT MAP�qT�� p y �' I � � fHE UND SIIRVEYO0.'S INKFD SFAI 00. SCALE' I =VO' T r O(� p .� C / � LMbSSED SEAL SHALL NpT�E�qq�DRFD 'j 2 f0�E A VAUD iRUE COVY. AUG I7, /9B3 � �i� C I / � � uUARANiEES WDICATED HGtFON SHALL RUN � � � i ONLY itl iNE GfR50N FOR WHOM iXE SWVEt � ('J� � / �� IS PREGqFW, AND ON MIS 6E4ALF i0 iHE �� s �f � I / 94� `_ _ _ _ / / i � flTlE COMVANY, GOVERNMENiAt AGENCY ANp �:, 29 . O\/ IENDING INSiliUilJrv tISTfD H:RtON, App � IO THE ASSIGNF[S OF iHt 4ENDING INSib / '� - i / G� �t�� Q � � S. 4B°55,��„W � roT�ooi�ioH�imsrrtunorsioa�iuweeAN.e �r� ! / �` 456.94 � �� wucet. �1 � . �/�;�+Yii. '�. ��. � ��v.e � ; � �. �� YOUNG B YOUN6, LA�D SUFV�O/PS � •�„� 400 OSTRANDEF A NUE, F/VEHNEAD,N.Y. I ALDENW. YOUN!'s, N.Y.SP.£.BL.S.UC.NO./2B4.'f ` now or former/y ✓ohn A. MC6uire HowaAo w. rouNG, N.Y.S.LS L/C NO. t3B93 � NO 83-63f �- � +1.� ' \\ 1 .� �01.0 1 �� \ ��p I � �� POyp � � � �+'o L. s/�J� � � � � � �^ „ \ � � ''o` � � � � � \ \ � � ( � ` \ 4p L. � � � � _ �"'^-�":. � �' e�.��UA'�� _ � � ' — 1 _ _ _ ` �\ \ : � `\ _ iy �� ` � � � � N� �?3 � Ns�e3/3p �� ei_se.3�I�LC'� � � � _ �� } � n � � / � / � --��.— ",S 1 �D ;, ti, / E' ; a i � � o. , h � � � 2TB o � — _ AliE-^/ E - - ' E �1 g �' 0 6 / / / � � - _ � _ -� ` J /V(/ ei:49 j� - � ��J / /b a / / / / / �— _ 4B �� 4 r i � / h � � ~ � � a4 � / / // � / / ' � 7 � �\ °�=r.., _ � " � � � / � /9gs�. _ - � 4 0 � � /52 /h� � � � � � �awe ,,� . a � / � � y�, � E $ � , , � �� / ' � � ,---�� "'� .—o o � � � � _�--' � W � � � � � � , : / � a I I , � , ' � � � � ti � � � � � I �'� � � � � y � � � � � � I Q. I � f � \ � � LOCAT/ON MAP � I I � ° � I � � O � SC.�LE' /':i00' 1 Q g \ I I P O N D � ' ' � �i�o`� TNEWAT£ASY.MtiYAMD SEIY�ED/SPI�SAL FAC/L/T/ESFORALL LO /NTN/SO£VEL T SHALL CAMpYY � � \ ' LOT l urGlsrLl:47.B j I� ,� f � � �` W/THTHESTi1Aq41�lSM17�S O F 7 J A E,�/f F O L K C A U V T�o e�,��M c��r� l I � � ' L�T 2 � ��,,�� \ TOTAL AREA=2.4_ � ACRES TOTAL AREA=P.479 ACRE,¢'� � � � ��'�' �i•. T=� �y AREA Ofp�N�p ,POO 3.F = AREA OFPoND=59,001'� . .F�! � � r� �� 1 AREA OFUPL�s1N0- 3,T,OOOSE' AREA OFUPLANO=50 .F • Na�E` � I � I i Cavr�uiv u�siawav rHur— so— 1 � 2 SI/FA9LK COGVTYTAX ANP O/ST. /000 SEC7. O30 BLK.06 LOTOOt � O � � � � � � 3. TOAtt ABEA� �.9I1 ACNES � � � I I � I A �' / � i � � � I ( ,__, �e � I � /1 � , �I I i � I o" � � / � � 1I i � I � � � '� . � � , ' � , � � � ; � � _ ; � I I 0 � i� / ` � y �� M/NOR SUBD/V/S/ON PLAN FOR / � � � O SUE HANAUER Q ✓OAN BA6L EY � I �� 1 b � AT SOUTHOL D I _ _ i p i - / � � � � � � �! TOWAI OF SOUTHOLO i / � / ..nwn�xue� u��xnu.r.�+� wWmun / � � � � � , , o ,„,5 5„a�E, ,� • ��ouT�o� o� SUFFOLlr COUNTY, NEW YDRK / � �� \�__/ �.FCTION �Y09 Of THF NEW YOw ST�iI // I � 1 0��„o„�^w SCALE� / =60" / / 'J tE OF YF� . I / � �O�IES Of �HIS SURVEY MAV NOl NARINC AUG I/, /9B3 f�1P I / 1 � I fHF LAt�D SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR OCT �4, /983 �j''pD w� `�� . / � ) FMBOSSED SEAI SHAU NOl BE GONSIDFREC � � ' YO BE P VALID TRUF WYY FEB. 26,/5185 � r° � /63.94, \ � ' � 293.00, C��SO,j aUARANTEE5INDICATfO ME0.EON SHAIL 0.UN � . . ONLY TO TNF PF0.50N f0R WH�M TXE SU0.VE� � . � I t / S.4B•55,��„W. � 456.94, / IS PREPA0.ED. �ND ON HIS BEHALf TO TNF / / pTIF COMiANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCr AM / �fMpMG INSTITUTION 45TE�NE0.EON. AND � � �O TXF ASSIGNEES Oi TNF LENUING IN576 �'" tUTION. Gl1ARANTEES AAE NOT i0.ANSfERAM1 � � � I �o uDU1TION�L IMAIiUT10N3 Of SUSSFM�- �IO VEIPNEAD�N.Y. . now or former/y ✓ohn A. MCGuire `°` �p�' a t.s uC.n�o.i2si3 rr��n w. rvuMc, �!r.s c.s vc.�vo. �ses� , . - ^ ,� � , „ , � . � � � � �\�� ' p�.Rxo aooxo ' � i � . , , . , , � . , . ' , . ': \� ,,.\ , �e?\ ��ax� _ - _ ��' - ' � ,� , . ,� � I" . . � ' _ . , ' , � .. � � � . �e —� ' I ` ' ' ' 1 �4 ' `' � � ' , . , , , _ � � . � ,e`� �ouxo y� ' �� ` � e��l � � � � � � � Q � � �� . � � � 1 _ , i. � ; ,� -a- �, / p� �}r� , � �{ l ��I ` � � � �� ' �4ff\i''e';y�l�'� _� ` � '�, , ��{T ,. ��I � � �� " � �, � , .. , � � ��. : , , 4 ... .,�� , , , , - � � � �, � �� (� r�, � M .� �bp7�ir,lq , ! " � �ya��'� � '. � � sy� 'yJ, ., ' I ' �, �� f�(�`��'if° ' ! �, , . , '� �� . i^�' !� � . _ yr � , ` � �� >� / i'„ ` � Op��Q>_ s i ,� \ � , '� � `41�st `� i ' , � V�n l� pdyJ4,�i � e �♦ l9' � „ . � � \ ,,.�;� �\ , �bn.� P , , , . , � . � � � ,. . \ i )' � � \ ', , � � , . _ ,' ,`� � \ ' ` � � � i \~" _�r i �` . / � � . ' � p , �t � � � , � , � � ' � '� A� �� i/ � � , , , , . �\ �� \� 1 ' \ ' ��.�r,1 � � � ' � '�� // . N � � . \ �� ` LOCATIQN MP.P i �e\ � \ � /� � .�i9 . \� `� `� � \ SCALE� 1��=600� ' , , \ � �� 1 � O � �� ♦ \ \ , .. , � f ` � Q / O ' `\ \ \ \\ �` r` i. , ' I e �� / 2199 ,� Oe �� \ ` �• � �` c�� \ � � � � °. � �� o'�� i ` � � � e\�� 1 . ,� � ro,.�` ��E�60 I \\j w` 4 �I 11., �. . \\ so` e+PC' I _� - I �R'� � i v \ � �°a �o� I •�� ``� o}� e�' ` �ir � `. . �� 1� , �p 4'�~' � ` ` F O'9 e'�946 , . '�� ( 11\ �`` � � � QO �� 1 1 1 �S Q i P � �' -';-- -- '`� , i �e � �i`� ` �, �� 1 I�i � �� , � S� � i � �, �n,r d \ . , ` �� i �Na � $�� e � \ � . , � , , SG F6y,D i0 i � � yo �� e � �" � �� a \ I o rvr is�p '�! � � ,,." ' °�° � �*' °' ° � � � � ' ^�Q � \ , 9 p' y � tl� �'r \ 1 1 �co�°� ,v(� I�'�+,:*'° 1 t• y � ; l`i: � � . �� \ 4�So"G�y 4a`9' �•; e ,. , i . ��a�` � ;I � � �i ; i)' , , � .f�Gl,i1��,p,l � �� G _ ,�(f� � �� . Q\� P� h9,�p� �5ib � `� ��"S�� \ � ' \ �Q o�,000, �e ,` , , �, F. O �3' ,;g• � Qa �e�'tl �%Pj� i �, � � 'k? � ��b��a0 i � C.� o� � •a . 4p'yF P ' i i !� � i�` a "�,:� / �S� I� - �isp � - `� . q0�p�JQ�' I v ete°� .L'� � ' ; , , , I i ` � . ri�^ `�� :A P,P O I �✓� . � i , ' � � i , ;i °� ' , � p��° PQ� /� � � p°j''�� ' , � � ' ", , ' � / ' ' , `. {� , � � � : , , ' , \ � � ' ex�:�a�. 66�� yk•h., �� ti� � / t ` �, b �g� / � � \�- � "�,6'��'� / ' _ \ �.� 9� � ' '.,,�6� . '�c49 �\ �5 \� {j'� , \\ r 64, . �, � \ ,�' �e j .� � -,��!i; , -.'� � � �� P��ap � , , pb��. : - � ' ' - . . � . � � a�. \�4�1NE GF ESHWAT6R �WE'R.AN0.5 (S \ � O �n . � @ i , � ,� ` V �JQ� ' �' � � � �ET I 9V � IN-CQNSl1LTANTS� INC , .\ \Q^ � O�'�Pp . � Pi \ ,� , ' \, � �6„ i'� 'i � �'�,R.P :�� C�°�� —eo— � ^ ^ � . , °+ � �,, l � P , � �' � � ..� � p. � � ' � �G� . � . 1 � � p � ' TEST HOLE 9-I TEST HpLE B-2 ` � ��p� � �� ' ��r � � ' a.a o.o - — _.. �—e� , � 1 �0<� / / \ % . ' LTJIIX,��M61OAM enx.nn�oui , , � , � i,Q-� 1 t .�orx onWcur Y,a , �eown�LLnuxo e.o sP4 SS i , 1 �,y� . `0�.��0 „�t� � No7E: . � , � uxo.nuex ��ta[ MAY6 P / � ' ��YkMi� � ' � � I � rl� � - � e.o � ` ' / �`,�i �i , 1 O � O� \ � IJ= MONUMENT 4=4A7H , _ � .�� _p4r � �tj� C � / 2.SOFFOLK COUNTYTAX MAP � . DIST. 1000 SECT.50 BLK,6 LOT4 t�xuno ' g� 3.TOTAL 4REA = 4.943 ACRES r�i unn rwa �M�vSL � " O� � ♦nree ara \ 4. ELEVATIDNS ARE flEFERENCED TO NOVD. (M9L- B29) 5 ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS� 47.4 ANO CONTOl1RS SHOWN \ _ea� / ' / ' - THUS�---48--- ARE FROM ACTUAL SURVEY. . 6. CANlOURS SHDWN THUS�—=48--ARE FltIX.I 2'0 2T Q ��TOPOORAPFI�C MAP- 8 EASTEflN TOWNS° PREPAflED FOR , � THE SUFFOLK COIINTY UEPT. ..k,pBLic WORKS. - i �p7 � C� G � M [� THEWATERSUPPLYAND9EWAOEDIDP09ALFACILITIE9FOkALLLOTBINTHIl�EVEIDPMENT� \ jnj P�f � � . COMPLY WITHTHE SI'ANDARDSANDREOUIIIEMENT90FTME9UFWLNCOUN7Y DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH, i IJLI FEB - 3 �ggg @�I �� .� �- ' � s HOWqRD W. YOUNG� Y.9. L.9. LIC.N0.46883 ' SOUTHOL�TOWNJ � PLANNING BOARO MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAN FOR ,�noPcerr uNr SUE HANAUER d JOAN BAGLEY aua: Zz',isee ' . °'''m', weu fM'l9NE0 cn�ne DaTE� UE0. 23;�587 � wEcc �r a� A? SOUTHOLD , E ' Sm,ase — '� . �9GLE I'�=60� ' _ g , r�wR � rirvisHen, c��nd '�M'N OF SOUTHOLD , � . �'wix -r-�--' i'wix. SUFKOLI( COUMTY� NEW YORK No. e7 - 2025 ' ' r'.vex� „ ' � r'.t.< � . e +uWurNoeia�o ��nm�nwi oe+oanox ro mn op N i � ' . �, y ' , � �� } � � lYIIV Y �� YI0.�lIOM R[CTIOM TlO� OI TNE Z� F . � � N[� o11N t1MTl lWC1 �ON U1M S r0 t' � , ' //t",l' � .1/19l'..._� , � � iP K' " NM/SE�' E � � . '� � � � +4 ' n} M cw�b 4 mi� rMv[r wo7 a��wo tM[ L�Mo pp W .� , , A ' : �. '1y � ' . n ' i'aVc' ' �'f ' T. �,"cvc. we t»e'� iwuo a�� o�qto�feo su ex�u ,�� ' Yp f , , Q, ' , e i � .� � , � L LIkT �� , , iwi�i[ cON/IOL1�osor.�vAiioreaeco�Fr o ' W, : , p t ■.u�...,a� �QIGT[0 NCIICON WLL� ��w oxr m �, r z �r ' i, ' � ' ' W � �' , ' I�N/M lOO.W. A. M[/dlfqq lOI1�ItlON TXC fYMRT if �I1@��CO � y� 0 0 a ' P�_OfM'O_WAIC� ypp�y,yy�� MO OI Ny H14tlf f0 T�TTL[COwMMr�OOVpM- - ¢-3'Ml � . ' , g[ . ' - - .• � - �' � LEALH/ACN�[ M[NpI .�MNCYYMllN31M�1M1TIt4TI0M1.IfT[P f � �l/L' lANM 9 PT/C L1MY �. . NGS�i w0 t0 ME �tlNM¢!DI iNl LEMOIM • ' ' , . ' _ �T 900 �G<L. IM�TtiVTlql. �UAII�M1Cp W1[ IIOT iM11lIL11��4[ ♦ SEiYI[ MNR W IWOInGM�I IMtt1TUTI011,1{ 011 !u�!!Ou[Hr ry ? o�wcWs � ° 4 � LFApI/M6 /OM. GE.1LN/N6 /GI/L � ' " � � , tOL�Yf11Ml{ ��CN ff�YlL OA �[CIIIC�M[f SF� �0 1 . 2 — —YM/N. — J� _ Mpj�Ti^LIMLt OIIMlOR?Xf�Lll[Cti M M ![NC67 �AND SU „ 0 G./M GRPVNO NMT F � ' SUiMf.�jYlLF�PUN/ , . � , � , , �,�A� � - � " TyP/CAL WELL OETAIL , � �P/CAC� SEWAGE' O/SPOSAL srsT£M � �� .YOUNG a YOUN�G R�FlFEAD� N R '��K� �� - � - � ' � � - � �LDEN W.YOWNG,PROFES910NAL ENGINEER � , , � � , ' ' � ' ANO LANO SOhVEYOH N.YS UCENSE N0.@B�S ' ' �, 7YP/CAL ' PL 07, PLAN - ' � � . ' . ' ' � NOWARO w.Y0UN0„L�NO SURYEYtl11 � , � � � � , . . �. ' � ' �M.KS.kICEMEE M0.43B93 ' � � � , ' , �� „ ' - ' ' , , . , � . , � , ': 601Tb .� . ' ' " . ' � ��"' ,