Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-50.-3-14 , 08-09-1995 08:34RM FROM CRZENOUEINC0RP0RATED TO .- 15167651823 P.01 f"l5 SY1ti=F �o i�� CAZENOVE INCoMRATM 1177 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS NEW YORK,N.Y.1OW6 TSJWHON5:=376745 FACSMU; (MM 3765387 MEMFB FACMC STOCK EXCHANGE 8 / Q /1995 FACSDME: f+ G ,g 7-3 To: r Toga! P�w.fJ�JG Bo�?�1 Company: aF: S Cni iE4 cy� From: S o.. S1Xk#A0J5 Total of Pages (Including cover Page) 3 PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL _ � �' /Y 15, /6 me✓��� S�:tt¢ rn .Oon�e anw z S06&Z")5ion trL 2 lois neuer,- THIS MINOR_SUBDIVISIO I FOR �_ LOTS ON �.�26 ARES LOCATED 91'f' oK a f-0-,4 �d L �� ,�.e IN SCTM$t 1000- s o — _ ,4 /J- /G 1. MINOR SUBDIVISION (NO ROAD) Complete application received Wo .14. ✓CetL�ov Application reviewed at work session ,ro.` oK rm•� Applicant advised of necessary revisions 5116 of Revised submission received ,��,ro` oK L�r42, ,Nro. OK Sketch plan approval -with conditions 9 i31 0 Ski l Lead Agency Coordination -i-10,6tw cA `,`j giSRA-.dGkS�S 1 ' SEQRA determination 1 Sent to Fire Commissioner 1— 93 Receipt of firewell location Notification to applicant to include on final map Sent to County Planning Commission s 3Nro.` oK Receipt of County Report '°0I` OK not Review of SCPC report tiA7 Draft Covenants and Restrictions received ,Nro. OK WIJ Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed Nro. oK Filed Covenants and Restrictions received Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval . Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions Endorsement of subdivision •115 il�il`i U 511 Iq I lu' e �q -It viee x0195 Zg A � Y 91D � `1I8�1 : ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 106 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAO, N.Y. 11901 (516) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MONTAUK HIGHWAY MARCIA Z. HEFTER TELEX-EHCA 6852318 UW P. 0. BOX 570 STEPHEN R.ANGELN.Y. 11976 TELECO PIER NUMBER(516) 369-2065 WATER MILL, JANE ANN R. KRATz (516) 726-6633 JOHN M.WAGNER ALAN D. OSHRIN WILLIAM POWER MALONEY OF COUNSEL THOMAS F.WHELAN September 28, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall <- Main Road Southold , New York 11971 Re: Land Division of Charles H. Lewis S .C.T.M. #1000-50-03-14 , 15 & 16 Dear Sir/Madam: I enclose the following documents for filing with your office in connection with the captioned minor subdivision application: 1 . Application for Approval of Plat; 2 . Part 1 of the Short Environmental Assessment Form; 3 . Questionnaire; 4 . Form letter regarding drainage; 5 . Copy of Suffolk County Tax Map showing subject premises , outlined in red; 6 . Copies of deeds for each of the three lots; 7 . Twelve prints of the survey for the land division prepared by Peconic Surveyors; and 8 . Check in the amount of $2,000.00 made payable to the Town of Southold . OCT 2 ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW A letter of authorization for the undersigned to act as agent for Mr . Lewis in this application will be forthcoming shortly. Please contact the undersigned or Michelle Klima, of my office, if you have any questions . Verb truly yours , Stept�n R. Ang r SRA/mlk Enclosures cc: Mr. Charles H. Lewis APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Ru es and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be .Land. .VAVJ s7An..o.£ . I haxlas. .H.. .Levis. . . . ........... .. .. ...... .. ...... ....... .. ...... . . . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... . . ... . . ... ... . . . . .. . . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suygcsted.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: Liber . .. ..10,859. .. .. .. . . .. . Page . .. .268 . . .. . . . . . . . . . On . . .5/.18/.89 Liber . .. ..10.85.Q............ Page . . . ..27.0 . . . . . . . . .. .. . On . . .5/.18./.89. .. . . . . . . . . ; Liber . .. . .1085.9. .. .... . . .. . Page . .. ..27.2 .. .. . . . . . . . . . On . . .5•/.18./.8.9 .. .. . . ... . ; Liber . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . Page . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . O n . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . .. . . Liber . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... . Pn1-e . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . O n . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . ; as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . .N./A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . or as distributce . . . .. .... .. .. .. .. ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .:. . ... .... ....... . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. ............................ . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. I . . . . .. .. .......... . . . . 5. The area of the land is . .. ?.•.2612.. .. ... acres. 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the (late hereof have been paid except . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . current . . . .. . . . . .... .. .. ....... : . . . ...... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . .... . . . . . 7. The ]and is encumbered by . .None.. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. ... . . . . . . . . .. . mortl-nlc (s) as follows: (a) \fortga,Gc recorded in T.ibcr . .. .... . . . . . . . Palc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . in original amount of $. . . . . . . .. . . .. . unpaid amount $ . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . held by . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . address . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Mort.lqngc recorded in Liber . .. . . .. . . PaI-e in original amount of unpaid amount $. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held by . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . address . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .: . . . . ... . . (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . in original amount of . .. ... . .. . ... . unpaid amount $. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . held by . .. .. ...... .. .. .... ... . .. .. .. ........ .. ..... address 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except XCI . . . .. ... applicant's.. .. .. . . . .. . . .. .. ... . . . .. . . . . .. . ... . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. .... .. .. .. .. ..... . . .. . . ........ 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts R-.4.0. .... .. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. .. . . . . ... . . .. .. ... . .... . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . ... .. .. .. ....... ........... . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex. cept . . . NP't:kAl14. A49WR .9t:1. Atlrye'Y 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (does)CEnot lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if within a District, is . .. .. .. . ... .. . 13. Water mains will be laid 1)), . . A/A and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by A IA .... . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. .... . . . . .. ........ .. .. . . . . . .. . . . and (a) (no) charge will be maac for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by . .. and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat arc claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets it, the Town of Southold llighwav system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which ltle not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat ,Iiox%.s proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division timps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said Pxistill,,, maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 1 20. In the course of these proceedings, the :Llll)IiC:Illt will offer proof of title as required by See, 03; of the kcal Prnperty Law. 21. Sel),!I;t ;j copy of proposed (teed for lots shov.'in­ all testriC6,11s, covelialitS, etc. %une Schedule "D".- x 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will he N/A $... .. .. .. . as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . .... .. .... . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". tc a�DATE . ..:� .. 19.90. . . Charles H. Lewis . .. .. .. ..... .... ..... . ... . . . . . . . . . . . Name Clic nt By . .. .. . . .... . .V�.. .IfoApplicant .. .. .. .-. . . . . ...: : (Sign urc nd Title) SteR. Angel, At orney and Agent P.O: Box 279; Riverheadt NY 11901 (Address) STATE OF NEW PORK. COUNTY OF . .. . .S.uffolk. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. ss: On the . . .. !. .. . . .... . day of. .��'' II\,�. . ,.!!' rV. .u,-. . . .. before me personally came •• • ��� •• • • C.�l ... . . . a to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . . . . executed the same. MICHELE L C p NoNry plblt•,SIW of al NN aw Yak �l � No,4UM•Wok Co . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . (fgllmWgl&*UApr.17,19 Notary, ublic STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. . . .... .. .. .. . ss: Oil the . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . day . . . .. . . .. ... of . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. 19. . . . . ., before me personally came . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .... . to me known. who being by me duly sworn did de- pose and say that . .. .. . . .. .. . resides at No. . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . ...... . . . . .. . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . a. . . . . . . . that . . IS Ills . . . .. .. .. . of . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . the corporation described in and which executed the fon•,,"oing instrument; that . . . . . . . . . . . . I:nows the zeal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. thatsigned . . . . . .. .. . . . . . name thereto by like order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notary Public ,, 1d•16d(2l87)_Tezt 12 � � _ _ _ _ PROJECT I.D.NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PART I— For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME _ J. PROJECT LOCATION: L 111d Divisi -ii MUnICIPallly °f harles H. Lewi: d. PRECISE LOCATIOCounty N See (Street address and road intersections,prominent landmarks,etc.,or provitle map) copy of Suffolk County Tax Map attached location . herewith for precise 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: RINew El Expansion 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Motlification/alterallon Applicant seeks approval lots. See survey to subdivide his three for project description, lots into two 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFF C7ED: Initially 2 • 2 6 1 �_ acresUltimately ®Yes EXI ❑No If No, describe Onelly 2 . 2 6 1 2 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY - - WITH STING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTINGGLAND USE RESTRICTIONS? Cg• WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? RIResitlential ❑Intlustrial Describe: ❑Commercial ❑Agriculture ElParWForest/Open space ❑Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A STATE PERMIT ®OR LOCAL) APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERA Yes ❑No If yes,list agency(s)and permit/a Suffolk C tyDeppprovals t .Pof Health ossibly aDECdetermination letter may 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE AC-!CN HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR gPPROVAL,4 u i r e d 13 Yes 91 No If yep,list agency name anQpermitlapproval 72. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes No 1 CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE APPlicant/sponsor name: Cha es H. Lewis g Ste hen R. Angel , Signatures Att - Ind en or Applicant Date' �a A If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you-area agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II—ENVIRONMENTAL SSMENT(To be completed b A. DOES ACTION EXCEED q NY TYp RESHOLD IN 6 y Agency) � ❑Yes ❑No NYCRR, PART 617.127 y B. WILL ACTION R If es, coordinate the review rocess antl use ECEIVE COORDINATED p the FULL may be superseded D REVIEW qS PROVIDED y anomer involvetl agency. FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCR ❑Yes ❑No R,PAR7sit 7.6? C. COULD ACTION RESU If No.a negative I CL Existingqualm IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH air Y. surface or Potential for erosion, groundwater quality or quantity, np se Elevels elsLOxistin (Ans A•er,;,-Way tlrainage or flooding Problems? s, solid dwntten, If legible) Explain brielly; 9 tralllc patterns, solltl waste Orotluetion or . C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explal C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish.Shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species7'Explaln briefly; C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted.or a change In use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explalr C5. Growth, subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly. C6. Long term,short term, cumulative,or other effecls not Identified In C'I Explain briefly, C7. Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)?Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL A ❑Yes ❑No It Yes,explain briefly OVERSE EN VI RON&fEN7AL LLIPACTS? FART III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCDe E INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above COmpletedb Each effect should be assessed in connection with its a y Agency) determine whether it is substantial,large,im o irreversibility; (e) geographic sco ( ) settin explanations contain sufficient deta I to sho, ,that all ref levant as g (I a urban or rural); (b P rtant or oche ry, add attachmen ) Pence Probability of in materials. Ensure it, is or reference su curring; (c) duration; dverSe impacts have been identified and rade materials. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more Ensure th adequately addressed, occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/Or1efetially lar ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on P pare a large or significant adverse im documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in anon anive declaration. Pacts which MAY AND provide on attachments asd action the information and analysis above necessary, the reasons su y sand ignificant adverse envir omental any porting pporting this determination: impacts a Namr ul LrdJ AFa•nc Y Hnnl °! IVPe Ndm,•UI ReSPunNplr '"Tl in Leet)Aga•ncV • rnlr m Kr+Pummla•Unuv . )iKnyfulC UI I(rSPUnt,Lyle Ulfi[eI In LPdd AgCncY Signa rule o! I'repa4r III Juh•lrnl unm revPonvrple ongen Dale 2 ED(,�� PLAjVNI G- RD T014I O SOUS HOLD SU FOL$= TY uj i ,v Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH YOUR APPLICATIONS FORMS TO THE PLANNING BOARD Please complete, sign and return to the Office of the Planning Board with your completed applications forms. If your answer_s , please indicate evidencece: y to any of the following questions is e these your guaranteed surveor submit other appropriate 1. Are there any wetland grasses on this parcel? Yes (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined No by the Town Code, Chapter 97, for your reference) a . Are there any other premises under your ownership 4 parcel, Yes No 3, Are there any building permits pending on this parcel? Yes No 4• Are there any other applications pending concerning this property before an her department or agenc ? (Town y of � Stat . ) Yes - � e, (Count etc \ 5. Is there any application P No any other agency pending before project on this parcel?ith to a different " Yes No 6• Was this property the subject of any prior application to the Planning Board? Yes No 7. Does this property have a valid certificate of occupancy, if yes please submit .a copy of same Yes No I certify that the above statements are on by th Plan ' ng �rd . considerin true and will be relied 9 his applic ttio Signatu e o property own r or authorized a c a �J CHARL S H LEWIS By : S PHEN R. ANGEL, gent dat ATTOR EY AND AGENT FOR APPLICANT Attachment to questionnaire for, the Planning Board STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ss : On the day ofYv) � before me came__ 5'�� - �� � y� Personally Irl to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. Notary Public N bNow Yak bon*.11,to Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision S .C .T .M. # 1000-50-03-14 , 15 , .1r Gentlemen: The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: (1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads . (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are proposed. You truly, St phe R. Ange SRA/mlk l A torn y and Age t for Applicant I I' Ei� 4 � s � i K I I I ri� '• o ' S + i r O F f f 3 e I 1 n VIII hill 1 � 9 F � F II II K p ? Y = s � F i � r' .F 1 p• Ei Y • r O V. • � ; G � v . •c ;y 1 r y K ,� � ~r J 1 i� '•. i��•' � O "I •S i �� �• '•�' � ? • • i a i t V � C O I III �i ^ n � + r`` :• O, C .. 0 0< y •I I n Ir �_ O `� •.' 9Lf '�" ` i f `- _ 1 1 I iyT I • •p " S e� Ir m � CIS! rr �' I,p &*-A I eall.at,e„e laaral .r = M 7b r .0 r•7 •�lgnaa tNr/rN.nen.rras ae'IaaAna Statue II ' as -- YftIRF�wrr41N — ;� GIMRCE 5. .. �9h C, ri LF7rIS and CHART helm At lav of ANN n, Lt . — OD the LL day of Oot n6rr 1. .��' "r' ' rvtldent 1 = �yp1 Y \, Pab el i%,*Pam Mai CRULEE If, e Ontario. CannA.St .� rr,.tdl nq ar 659 St , Pl^rrc Strep, +111 0-111114 -f�.r y�A+M"�"w~"M JY r1. rtrw~A.r.A\n rrM\rlN.lrr•n rrr rT nlln\I.41d I. r, 'aN.••1 tlr I.rr\ nl tb.,n tt•W .M .r4a.r unla Ib INrtn of h 1 n ALL r►el ryA MrnA. er'ela.. PI•r. I�w. ..r rwn rl •.1 I.M 011: �_ +i!•: It N+R 1�• y,.���� 1111CSeXt ola i\�ey]q C`IIIIti•.a`t�vint"e 'Id 11.1 N, 139—e�O� trttersrc-f!rn < rth..,�t toner :+( the '\otcr>� erd detlttrlhr ifr• lt.n'rt•..iz SSt•t ma ry M'li P(Wof thRthUtM S and n( t+. 7Aanm al Amir', 71. Byatt., atNl tu..t. — first 1 CI said p 7�f Ilir•ll, to rK 1•r X20' E.111.In'go at," Otty� nitlutof ..I n tM land 0"t"Ily Ilrw , i".T•�rh�}• ,Y.rirr.M •N.I' LN'l t, 2a�Bela r 11• — - 'lla'npt albey lye ,� rb..'rr fly lln th;.411RY of ttr orae _ )1.11 Ond p.N , 1 — drVrr..I A. " M11 `-•a ,f ttr` aecbtd Fa R. N.1 1 no. It MOM `rld 1Yti wAlt, 17' cw^ t r�l"d"fSAM Wle r E. Nya�,.:� J MAW of �:Xlfr• 'k111- 02. 2 __ 1'\Oetrnr rt th n^ 0� N _ lCt i!r r! sIl ^r1 rl3}rt n( ynl f Ract In vthh fi'N 1v n( ttN• f 11D1 4mr •rte Y. V-Il- Jl^. r....r;.:A,,t"IFY ..I z!rvthr Nteld Party rly y ..t ' Rlap It ■ rrdlt Rnr.• . jrry MY P rtarifrt Of tnr frsT` hnze,•~�i���CRY If th, first ntll _ ' L1��alal A M-tn Orr^1SM for•UN! P�.xrf,f� `-zatt t tllrr first t t'I dPOE!df tAe PIR mf Said nrr' MnN•, et'te•rtrlo M1,4 WIP M,a.,1. — LM.CTM �q w =. •rl AAF M woti M. n 41 N IAr r�I+Aq\F M.�w.A..•.rwrM.IAw tlr.Mnr ..1 A C pan >•TI iAr~•tN"Nrrt`'L.i r`t zrirl.'.0.°',r„'^/I�.rne+/. .. ~!'b AfM r., drat Al. 1. Data +Trw.l�ne M,.r 11•r Nnp , "A . n >Kirl��'Ar.�M A.. **-'w d Al AN-1'.rrw rA.y'VAwa .It mar/.rteow I.M_• 11 1 fal�_.• ^^Mr�.Jr.tar P.A. .I 4, AA AAY.r.IA.oNr of IAN wolowT. b r ' /•A1 A..4A n-WW` 1"4 Asti 4 M r MIT cY w " I wlbw w w wd.tNtgt►w!�.' 4,I L.J'd✓-.°a ,,C ea/fit,, w cA t a P--,*raa. YtYS r•Z 10 PR,Irlon s.1►two 16 •�• ♦.+ CE(IRCF. S. Lr W f S Mr.wyl. drr d �4sees rt I i e ry - r 1� Y ssr Vw�1R�1► ISM 4dlrld.d — 'they Y+�►sYd lhr itr �x dse '1 tbn �.•r..�u..111M �� M tM hldir46ul ,� C STAN ' '.Ikftey Pot) !o' toraar at r&tr 1S1t4ry Public,701596 pSts of Ktw Yr.rk lu - ver _.; MtFCarLdon Expire" 7/70/91 Iuthorl,ed and al tnted by bgRw NRI .d�tdlt►w 4nsdn to •dwfnLue wtha 1 art. ki} r dl�Weiksrytrf�lrn I °t ' M MR y tN/ R(r yby� � t9 6e_fore se Os tow daf st , M { yv 4Wbt trsldn r1 by !L�m M did Ldry,w rl,d t�N/rat[ G I I t 14111, r�ilsM a'Paa� y for r. ti b w ..1.q dpt dasdyldtmy .►1 , I. • �.',' _ — 7 ko M psi _ bw ►•ksu b b�rY Isr~��^�Mratiss'Wl�d"•�r..Ml dsq asd Iky `dtr 1.yj •� •r r Mrt n M. yid but tresbd do It, •. d b 1lrlse dselra kY �a~y.Mr. y eOWNS,dlr rase that .ysp:; yld dol rabrerihrl y NIIS! I .,.; . aJ<1V� t I .lrtkd 114L µrssr�I "Oeo d.ndm SCC"m BLOM OtOR0C IAT I ; tF71f7$ and CNARGtetlL!;tyl S, taopf171 at 7osn •• 1 i l 70 {CRARLt$MtwlS i. !it'll"bt 7Wt I f At-LAN rr. STAN ESO . . .. .. _ thl New York Alenuv - N•Irrtfngton, ?few 70r1h tr I . ,I a t .. 0 rN7 kfns > uNR 15 10 tl��Sit.1"175►71. rates .�Y� fN J}t".jJR,FMe �'C V H 7r L6M46 nr•.,nfflyyrtt_nal waiftrMtrrr rNdM p o 4iC vi •�: ,�a W • Tom Opp med.the lTNtB[tr r -- . eiwrina hued'ed m.t hi hells Eat• LEW S and CHAR'-E, 1!- i.Ht'IS, aB bole dlatll.l•u'.v:t�• nl law of ANN B. LFKfS, vhr died a resident c>f' Na f:.i; ; !f In. on the Is day Of' Oct ober, 1986 , re Mrg4d.ffrr p,,%"d _ C11ART.C3 R, LEMIS, resld:ng at 658 St. nVerre Street, T Ontario; Canada - W � 3 Writ .f dre t..,..t Put. -- "T WiJ�P.", q rti I.", ..f"' F, 1 Mn of Teo t do Wrt. nl Ilre�. Wn.m..anidnd �ly•_•r� "t «en 4..tT...f rM W , A.., tiere, ,trent enJ rrhar unb�74n eod oder •luM::�iw C rrni ne t All tlut eMun WA. w/rM an.vr,I Mr1 lorevn. Wrtr of the Moo:l 1. 1 I le 5i'hJ d.:4:n:l t(., t yl�t'ijL"'rt, •oh dr Fuld�n.. vnl .,w�hr 1)a,drr rrr •n n d. y,. - • hoed, . :.folk Cnlnl rrnr the \7 t Iagt• O� f _ Hyatt. 141.40'; •.r l 1tOum kd On the [lest 1 t t�h r: P wr - rn tth tkI , by et!rr land Of th• pert of lenl of 4r li! 1� _ SCRI rn tri y ty by , th•r ITx] Of th" putty, of the first SOattA Y thrt e f( -sr. �t,r ywitihh NP°"t'"e^ta2`+' in t:'" an rr�\lald by llnd of R.J�lbekefe�l:cu-� tl;>on � �.. Pottitla of t rladt 1a pss to and fro Ouar Bald right running fro GO L.Itt t& or (� he land hrrr•tn to Lighthouse 111tY frrn t34� I C ttl ur: - ,.,yr�TM Road. SC db — y • t 'i t 63- N _ - i ,. 4i.J1.i°1 ••. iF - LOT MhY l8 d .p rR •. • .0 r4h1. lith erM ler. - o MW to t 1 1t a why ppaniwr.,rlr~..M f. 6jt,.br In a"dt TM N M Min'Iu1r111 n4, - part rh.bein M wn".rN.Md 4V�A`fV�7Y ly f!i11, 4�O the Wet .f the fry AM4 W^^,4L AM Lrvw rw,on•IM+r.e��rl,`^elate) ../rM 1. hJort.ed Ir file KI f 4.4p a,po nwr.k." _ pert.iR Wrt in e..,n I •hNean.•vr .. M'�Ned.er ryhie {( - JJ 71rr.yd d,nY jtrOr wp !.!4it6 ro.r e1 rM N tw.AnmlYor pl aI. b.e.er.,,t w d■n.d'p.nra`ifn.-f~,"the t mr�a iy M mwi Ml.r pP� as mmm� �otoe Ir -Li' � MIYa the Wirt M rM hrrr We hM J.I. n tedrr%m b to M �. nw.J•w AnJ tin*1 n w Set �.: � ✓-ILtJ4e: .. �. 7 {'�Al p MOM _. I r" � 4afcm-Ct...` 19 tl0.M."ww rM rM k sor C80RC.r: 5. J.r wIS ! d,•.d Ok..e s 4.+a w he tM idiridnJ • M IM h iaalra.rwy, drwri6d in .wd .h„ .. 1 �.. 1. w ' ALLAN C. 9TJi4 . . otary - Att.r ,, at Jw - - N"tar. .bt. Ir. tnrL /n - 4.. ltl.k 70i5rh .1JC G. CA Lr - 4a•av Co..ner-Cq�lufon ixpl re. 3/3019 Aurhorlre.l and nt.,Intnx 1 Canada to aJmf plater o � � � h MA"Mopt.tratar fredarfc r�, iar.,11. a t4r f "! 0406 ir of r. "A".n mw rat aatawr 6" sol�+a�ar. tC .4lnee s Q de d. al _ ••S fw,V y� Lr r N• .ala. dd &V,.4 sob Rs rave S !1 . al"wiwwa;hiRf cows is thm a(1 kr 1. .�a/q did deyuvP�`a�,e tMlinYd, r b r n e� - V aaA ..hkh esalrd def do"rMwiw d.,ali ekr 6]weal.. —— wait law N wy a." .. t►^7�rs' sw'd SSW4M L , Balk rrrr` wdr d dw h.wA 1 �,rMr,.t ya also • W�jrM1r yw +M tw�red Nr 1 .t�h, ii ra d.t lal i i r `also h lye w dr r.e +Iw*i�4ii m; saw , 1 h �1 tlrdfr ' row i.rnl 11 ,w 1 i - — llru •V.A. .E1.T10f. atom ..-M CrLOT LEWIS end CSARIXSAI.E.i IS, G71.'JlfT 0111aNN _ Harv=!tr wA I I r l — ALLAN C. STAN. •. 483 Nov rork — i fl•mt fngton, New 1 — _:., .pew.;PL' 7•^ di r ' - i .J\707 d1'11wZ 1 = to rr 3 0 111`Jif111'r 0111"If FA.wit 81 � c=�rn:1n 4 �� 2?Pa 4 s.ea s aaa tin wlnrawwl-nu trrtausnnt"tows M tar ov uve.lsnf onit ^ 3•'l57.?e �.�.x• �atdr'.r „11th edlNuf[yRt�wwL dr 1/-_..a,f.( .:wwat 6,,,dad ad el r _ oc^ GLLIIGt S. LL%IS nM CHAHLSS 4. t5wt5,' es ante distrlbuttres and 'q Vr, tllsld at law of A1R A. LL111S, wt 1i. ,• r,•aldent of Nassau Caunty1f 5'y, ,���f�. ;•., {�• z the, lot day of O-•amber, l9Hb A • P"4 V fwa Part ad ? — 0'` tVLPS 11. LEWIS. residing at bib Ontario, ( asada St. Pierre Street, Tecumseh, ` - _ .. rat" .4 ad�e��too�od Pm. - '� �. ^,•^w.11itrt,da Ib ra•n ..l rM fir+port.is.a.•dnauw of TM Dft'.andt1b. slaa�east, ,.atYa ' M4 hr tl.Psm of tM•r...d tun d.+,tw,.l•, Prat .a,l•,4r ala the r _ v.anar. Mol o-4—,,l n. nn, ..f the w,.,d pan b,•r.r Mae 4 dr tsswtrd rat ilr his ' >'e 4 .,t ]IC11't"�[�f's to-I--. mar rlr I.url,lrn}+ a•.I iwl.mrawa. tbr„w .tweed. oilasra, h near Smthoid, in the Canty of arf.`olh aM Ftarr r( N+ Y.xk. t++m,V d DSwrl of StrrihuId' Wr,INITIC at, a print �r, •ir !r, ]tfd detw�rlbed ollorst erirr•; Iter tctic•, and Of the party of the first Dt'I Nit arrf lard le the p n It of •,,, e,�i Part, at Lisa .. aald {ad of tic pertter. It thr e,._rn] llor't3atesLazly t�tmr of _ part: and hart [ S.dl "ster'ny0bojoUn-.l9n q^rf.v.t rr,ra r,'rncrote ta=nnentl lTtwoCBielrn�r' 11r1e v tk+rtMastr_rl :r,- t!r• pirtv of the first 42 deqrsama ICC� 11' 10' F♦25.0 fort: :`a�•Kv a; IiM of tin• party of the firstrtparrt. 4 ecarses. _ as [ollowst - �c- Ill on a lute at richt amlt,.p to ter ]art drtncrlhed rrttlrar 14• 5n• w,170.11 Inter t-, el.• •,rr, atnue, S.47 deQirnoe - after d"scrll.,d: TTa+tn• !>r.'.^.t•-rty Iltr of a 30 fnot. right Of way, bevels- 5e. 121 m n line paral!-I wl th thr se rno ctyrr dea ritM alxtue and along Solid 11- Northeasterly line of said 30 fret right o[ way, N.d2 Thence 131 still along %,l:] !1•.t»b,vtnrl 1 �, 11. 10• %.100..0 feetp (. N-SS degrees r2' S0' %.233.c1 ft<•.. Tt� in u N.44 degrees 30 foot r right Of way. J _ -_ [o laM clow re fomerly 33 trs. tt.S.A.1 T°tetice al degrees 52 20' !.231.05 fast "�-- mg Bald lard now to faaarrl J tlw U.B.A.. S.dO hcn.w .]' 20• E.°.0.05 feet point of ]' -�' � the B�IIs. fly. lfii kiILAll —- NAT 18 11-t.1 TAX 1tI MIf11 wp N twM. as4 ad rnl. d a,. ,d dr -_ I+rl) 4 d. dry rat w ANDA to Mt thew and M N I�M and r M y M P.-aft to de t a ti,w, ll MI fOGXIFR with dw _ dr Puha lwtsio or Wo can.ow Pont of.J,0 GM yn is ad re rtid p"Was. To HAVE AY _ tl►tawed pre tw.rr., Pat. tti tri,ar rrr.w.n tsrJ nwiPr of 14.pot"of . ter I-1 low P"•1 da dM I-,r, vvwaan tAw 0-Pan• .d dr 6r Pat"sus M A—of•a/.tad onvi,pat,whas�P - Pawtws far Isra.n,u•,M.d w.nr .., whslner..t.e�s a d.wv4 ./6e LM rti w UW th . :i of Nr Luw I�w...w.aay da d% r.awdrf -a int IM,rno,•,aw.awl.i0 Iraa I.wrd w.V ss11i•d do/ .ew_ pPs. hdd,k ryda R toes.wA /.ar 4 aaaNaP•Airs - f', M wstd'r«n sh.s to f d.•aP.warwt•M..rt sass sor port 4 d.s�,y 4 ja,eae M awl ad'apph 6.Poor A~ Fa rts r%a rad'twa _wArwr 6 11►srwsr 4 r►i adw)'crow. r w M�MItO1DOF.14 Port -16.dm Pon aa.dah raaalsd da Aad MaJ...4 A..6. = 1.tsot�wts w_ �. i �f 1 Pr ' wrwwTw�'+� "` . .. . P14�•e+,_r !t lra l�:e �. _., /� � /1 .:t, .. .f+Irrs�YatwYswt tKgws• � G r '` PrMe,rT err CEORGE S. IFD1 al Ki• �� ''n. . it•�' Inil. -, r.i we 1 i lop, � .rolord tWra • k k.,adieWe,.l/dealSd w ern they 1140e6adrdu1 1(W .h..tir n...41�•.e�.„.vn r-I r.iy.drbrw•"aWaRwewW.wr •. _ ti.fAT f., STA}( At to�y at Law 4+tan Nblfe. State (11 New Y,•r4 So. 10-47075% FTIzT'I' c.--t'F :,;`XrIF{,i i. _.._.... . Saaaau Coo Autt. rl,• !ti aad +PMtnted b I' .7 .4utb•r Hrnw�� Faplrea 11)0/91 Lamda atrint.tet cattle, 1, - 11f •t �, , -- ti tr r dq J t s Rat! 0 elr raw Comm or _ p...e,.aF er w rtP!Gtldr..r D W w dr14 n�dn r nw~ too j* ee,,�did depsr low uerMmbra aYalgoallfta titre,• r ie M,a...nr .werr 4 i O - Yir 4 i tlr •.,we,,Aid Iyr.tal,af Yy V nw 4. ilti _— thr 4 kew i aad eAir► ererRel tie Ike eerp.y.a d•.vd.d kae,re, tka eM d add Rii irrewe: au, 4 e idor i iea, Ie, A °+M•eee,: dnl W eel ebad decried i and r4r wrfi ♦ b n.. 1. ,r1 W. , afirN b�aedr�il Ibb ej .4 b: tb" a r.e M ar Yn. aW eiwriill vita wr �i,!er 1i N 04 W V .d 1, i dio a.- 17"=&Z .•f re,id a.,pre eee.e,Ikr r�r: e,r YM I 16 til r!r l�. daed ► e,s turn 1 " rrdn. r M •ane tie e.k.rYel k low a .. ..1 aR tw ot.. aFrederf, C. 1•arre11. - It . Rt,. r Sccnor 1 ;i t,Kfe tlw Kot. - IOT � GEORGE LEWIS and CRARLF.Sd.-,rWrS. COOM an t0p - To - CRARLESILLL'RTS Rfll�R I:tlU i. AL'.LA1'. C. — ' 411 t4•v totk Arar ne .c... Runtlnaton. New In -- .._t r s.y... •t 1..,,e 1i a 1;1743 P qy..• e,,4.. } •r I I i rt'j:r>t9 uflrfl, —_ Lt t� 08-09-1995 08:35AM FROM CAZENOUEINCORPORATED TO ' 15167651823 P.02 W'F=simile Town Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971 Attn: Melissa August 9, 1995 Dear Melissa, I am writing to inquire as to the status of lots 14, 15, and 16 adjacent to Horton Point Lighthouse as shown on the attached tax map. I am the owner of lot 12 and understand that lots 14-16 have recently been offered for sale. Specifically, I am interested in learning from you the following: 1) are lots 14-16 as shown on the map accepted/recognized by the Town as the current configuration of the property (the previous owner had applied for a variance for a different sub-division of the property which I understood to be dormant)? 2) are lots 14-16 (disregarding the proposed sub-division) "buildable lots"9 what are the specific zoning regulations which apply to these lots? 3) can you tell me the amount of annual real estate tax which applies to each of the three lots? Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you are not the appropriate office to respond to my questions, please forward my correspondence to that office. Kind regards. Yours sincerely, W. Scott Simmons 710 West End Ave.,#6A New York,NY 10025 (212)-376-0894(office) (212)-749-2623 (home) C Encl. r(i _. 9 19OLDTOWN- ING BOARD 08-09-1995 08:30RM FROM CRZENOVEINCORPORATED TO A r� . � 15167651823 P.02 L.043 _ ,a S e00 / /90•� 5 .s6 zaa a 614(07: -r, a A3 • �Ja " ° .oe `°° lzray �1; /'/3v �Q.. - ra, J ° 2 w^' 1 t• • $DL�)D rap /,j 2 "�q� i'r+o"FC' SOUTHOLD PARK DIST. ', v Z°° s L / 11 0 If p .' ~® " &13A(c) 1 1.1A It IO a,• '°° arf ..• dr rS' .�° aor F° �a M1i ear ni 1s,•• f. :a, • '•r p� .fP'iV +a. 4 v .� oa o. r . 6 /S /B,a •e. & �''• �• SGC 'b. 9� l � !O .. /o9 e ..•. - Ig 19.1 + � / s 8•, 6 9 •aa. ,ar 3-04 (�./, ti 4 \�� "� • pq/ 6g4k) aN• 00 �q� J '1 eJ i u 9 Is 22.2 ..... 6344 13A 22.4 c'°. �J \l� aO: \1.._ /�) �•a. z- t ro• a,lA 5 �a / 1 I ;4 y )44(e) a rt: A 22 } r•., % FOR PARCEL MO. sa / SCE SEC.NO-054-03024- < LINE a J; VKC!! OR1WN OTNCRWIl C, 41L OROvCpTICS`rJ 1RC 1017901k THE rOLLOWlr4 Gil Tp lENOOL ! _ if WE/_ Ww0 i1Rl�! � MrOR1Rr -- 116wr��4! --------,_ fEr MAP ,;0 M O l Property zoo .4W © COUNTY OF SUFFOLK I - =— - Rea "� `�- —^N:.�I :.:�;.1T Tax Servic;: Age C- Jnty Center I Riverhead, L. )„ New York 050 03 Oo341 _ TOTAL P.02 yDUTMD40 Stt6FJL P� SOUTHOLD FIRE DISTRICT P.O. BOX 908, SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 October 23, 1993 Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Office PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Charles H. Lewis 1000.-5-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Ward: This is to notify you that the Southold Fire District Board of Commissioners has reviewed the survey for the above mentioned parcel. At this time, there is no need for fire- wells on this property. The Board of Commissioners feel that there is adequate fire protection for that area. Sincerely, aa►�q Cynthia Caprise Secretary nrT 2 619M APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS J SCOTT L.HARRIS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman -4 Supervisor Serge Doyen,Jr. James Dinizio,Jr. 3>, _.? �P" Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Robert A.Villa P.O. Box 1179 Richard C.wilton 1 N SoutholdFax (, New e 765-k 11 w York 1971 y � Telephone (516) 765-1809 Telephone (516) -1823 00 BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 30, 1993 John M. Wagner, Esq. 108 East Main Street Riverhead, NY 11901-0279 Re: Appl. No. 4184 - Charles H. Lew-As (280-A) Dear Mr. Wagner: Enclosed please find a copy of the findings and determination, with conditions, rendered by the Board of Appeals concerning the above-noted variance application. Please notify our office in writing as to the date of completion and extent of improvements within the right-of-way in order that arrangements may be made for acceptance. Also, please be sure to return to the Building Inspector, Planning Board, and any other agency which may have jurisdiction for issuance of final permits and approvals before commencing construction activities on either lot. We have furnished copies of this approval to the Building Department and Planning Board offices for their update and permanent recordkeeping. Very truly yours, Enclosure Linda Kowalski Copies of Decision to: Building Department Southold Town Planning Board APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L.HARRIS Gerard P.Goehringer, Chairman Supervisor Serge Doyen,Jr, James Dinizio,Jr Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Robert A.Villa ' � � r �ti P.O. Box 1179 �. / �x ;�� Richard C. WiltonSouthold, New York 11971 Telephone (516)765-1809 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF"pEATR Telephone (516)765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Appl. No. 4184. ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Upon Application of CHARLES H. LEWIS - Variance as provided by New York Town Law, Section 280-A requesting standards of minimum improvement to the traveled bases of two separate (private) rights-of-way for safe and sufficient access by emergency, fire and other vehicles located as described below: Access, to Lot No. 1, as modified, with its proposed access over a right-of-way extending from the westerly side of formerlyof sRoPantel, referred toasrpremises Parcel #1000-50-3-3. 4, and over premises now or formerly of Suffolk County, known as Parcel #1000-50-3-3. 1. Access to Lot No. 2, as modified, with its proposed access over a right-of-way extending from the northerly side of Sound View Avenue, Southold, NY, in a northerly direction over lands now or formerly of Regan, Lindermayer, Stanley, Kudinka and/or Garcia and Sileo, referred to as Parcels #1000-50-3-16, 7, 8, 23, 9 and/or 19.1. The subject lot requiring Section 280-A approval is shown as new subdivision Lot No. 2 as modified and further identified as County Tax Map Nos. 1000-50-3-14, 15, and 16 for a total combined area of 2. 2612 acres, and which is pending before the Southold Town Planning Board for re-division into two lots. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on August 18, 1993 and September 20, 1993, at which time those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded (see transcript prepared under separate cover) ; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and Page 2 - Appl. No. A14 • Matter of CHARLES LEWIS (280-A) Decision Rendered September 20, 1993 WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. RELIEF REQUESTED. There are two separate easement areas over which the applicant is requesting two separate access routes. The first right-of-way (referred herein as ROW No. I) is shown on the map prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. revised August 17, 1993 as the "westerly 30-ft. wide right-of-way" extending from a point along the northerly side of Soundview Avenue, North 42 degrees 5 minutes 23 seconds West 623 . 46+- feet, to proposed Lot No. 2 {as re-divided in this change of lot lines} . The second right-of-way (referred herein as ROW No. II ) is shown as the "easterly 25-ft. wide right-of-way" extending from a point 654. 52 feet north of the intersection of Soundview Avenue and Lighthouse Road, running along the westerly side of Lighthouse Road South 55 degrees 02 minutes 20 seconds West 201. 85 feet, thence North 41 degrees 4 minutes 10 seconds West 72. 68 feet, thence South 48 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 158. 35 feet to the southerly property line of proposed Lot No. 1 {as re-divided) . The owner of proposed Lots No. 1 and No. 2 does not own title to the lands over which this access route is shown. Sufficient notice to the owners of said lands has been furnished for the record. The attorney for the applicant has assured the Board that the rights-of-way as shown are not in dispute and the easements are deeded to the applicant and his predecessors in title. 2. PRESENT CONDITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY. The condition of the base of both rights-of-way are in fair condition, and is further noted below: a) ROW No. I is shown at a full easement width of thirty ( 30) feet, and a traveled stone roadway approximately ten (10) feet in width; b) ROW No. II is shown at a full easement width of 25 feet,, and a traveled dirt roadway width varying from 8 to 10 feet. The base of each right-of-way is in need .of improvement, and the traveled portions should be widened to 12 feet and have at least a 15 ft. unobstructed clearance for sufficient maneuvering and access by emergency (fire) vehicles and trucks. 3 . In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: the detrim) the benefithe to the safetplicant, as weiqhed against y, welfare of the community, Page 3 - APpl. No.084 • Matter of CHARLES LEWIS (280-A) Decision Rendered September 20, 1993 is greater, and is not unreasonable or substantial in relation to the requirements; b) the benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some other method, feasible for applicant to pursue, other than this request; c) the relief requested will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district; d) the difficulties created are related to the land and are not personal to the landowner; e) this application, as conditionally granted, will not be adverse to the preservation and protection of the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Accordingly, on motion by Chairman Goehringer, seconded by Member Wilton, it was RESOLVED, to ADOPT the following standards of improvements, and conditions, in this application for relief under the provisions of New York Town Law, Section 280-A: 1. The entire length and base of both rights-of-way (I & II) be improved a minimum of 12 feet in width, and have an unobstructed clearance at 15 feet in width within the easement areas; also, driveway areas must have an unobstructed clearance between 12 and 15 feet in width; 2. Straightening of the turn within ROW (best possible) ; 3. Since approval is requested over both rights-of-way, all potholes must be filled with bank run ( 20% content) for the entire length of both rights-of-way, as well as placement of 2" Of compacted stone blend for a full width of 12 feet and entire length, {and scarified where necessary) ; 4. Both rights-of-way must be kept in good condition at all times, and continuously maintained. In the event this right-of-way is found in poor condition, the Town may take whatever action is necessary -- including the reopening of this new applapplicationseforuthisand/or oher notice tpublic hearing, and/or require utilizing these same rights-of-wa properties in the area routes; and Y as their only legal access "Page �4 - Appl. No. 64 • Matter of CHARLES LEWIS (280-A) Decision Rendered September 20, 1993 5. A description of the improvements to the rights-of-way, after completed, shall be sent in writing to the office of the Board of Appeals, before acceptance is made by the Chairman or his authorized representative. It shall be the authority of the Chairman (or alternate Board Member) to accept or reject the improvements made, or require other modification for further improvement or better maneuverability within the easement area. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Dinizio, Villa and Wilton. This resolution was duly adopted. lk � //G%�' GERARD P. eGEHRINGER CHAIRMAN � 9-z5-43 ��r,,Uf Fll(t{C pG g� t L _ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS "C.p ^� SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard G. Ward,Chairman i a ' b ��. Su prn7 ver George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. '' 'Ibwn Ilnll. 53095 Main Rood Mark S. McDonald = P_ 0. Ifoz 1 179 Kenneth L. Edwards Smahoki. Nrw York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE F-: (51 F,) 765 - 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD t Frederick R. Weber, Secretary v Southold Fire District Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Weber: En . Osed please find ( 2) surveys for Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by y f, cooperation. Thank you for your er tr 1y enc. Officers PLLcc9e of greea�nor� INtoRvoNgTEO I.J. SUPERINTENDENT OF UTILITIES MAYOR NEW INCORPORATION APRIL),1868 JAMES I.MONSELL REINCORPORATION UNDER GENERAL LAW MAV]8.1891 STEPHEN L CLARKF, � ASST.SUPT,OF UTILITIES ,IJV r*, WATER I WASTEWATER TRUSTEES '�•t V GERALD W.HICKSON JOHN A COSTELIP fi .�y„J` ELECTRIC JOANNE DOLINAR �,.0 N C I S LAN ARTHUR 1.APICELLO GEORGE W.HUBBARD q-y�-" `y UTILITY OFFICE VICTORIA SWENSEN ou.r.a •+'� IS 161477 174H 236 THIRD STREET PAX(516)477-1707 VILLAGE ATTORNEY GREENPORT. NEW YORK 11944 DANIEL C.ROSS POWER PLANT (516,477 017, September 23 ,1993 Richard G. Ward Re-. Choak-s Lel,uis Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.0-Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Richard, There is no impact to the Greenport Utilities , water, waste water or electric . Thank you for the request for our comments. Sincerely/, —ltfix,. Gerald W. Hickson Asst . Superintendent Water and Waste Water GWH: fka cc-Mayor Stephen L. Clarke Village Board of Trustees Utility Committee James Monsell-Supt . of Utilities o SES 28 few Rich Caggiano-Bldg. Inspector Over 100 Years o/Community Service • • uric COUNTY OF SUFFOLK MS 9 YG� ROBERT J.GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING HAROLD J.WITHERS,PH.D. DEPUTY DIRECTOR September 22, 1993 Richard Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Minor Subdivision: Charles Lewis Tax Map No. : 1000-50-3-14, 15, & 16 SCPD File No.: 1333-NJ-93-07 Dear Mr. Ward: Please be advised that pursuant to Section A 14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code that the above captioned plat is not within the jurisdiction of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. Very truly yours, Stephen M. Jones Director of Planning S/s Frank Dowling Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division FD:mb Irl) "" fl SEP 2 4 H.LEE DENNISON BUILDING ■ VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY ■ HAUPPAUGE, NEW YORK 11788 ■ (818) 833-3192 f V n PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS "' 2 �! SCOT17 L. HARRIS Richard 0.Wald.Chahrnan Supervisor George Ritchie Latham,Jr. � .�i �- � .'J f Bennett orlowsk4 Jr. = �� Town Hall,53095 Main Road Mark S.McDonald `'''=mµ::a^' P.O.Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SepA ) ,19 9 S Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed Subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of - mar\,eS ewi s Hamlet/Locality C S.C.D.P,W, Topo No. ; Zoning _ R- 40 S.C. Tax Map No. : 100c) - So 3 - ILL 15 + 18 Major Sub. Minor Sub. _Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: r Skc,4c� �l-r�93 ===may Plat ( 3 copies) ,/Road Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1) _Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan ( 1) _ Grading Plan (1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) 1 Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an �Unlist_ ed) _ me I) � TYPa II)Action. 2. A `Negative De last (D term. of Non-Significance) 1has ebeen l adopted)by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) (J��. 4. The proposed division has received approval from the S.C. Dept of Health, es (No) . Comments: -------------- We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (No) Referral received - 19 by Suffolk County Planning Commissio and assigned File NO. n Very truly yours, /J Richard G. Ward rrs Chairman LfFO( e .2), PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS CIO 3fi` Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS FSP;,.. ��, .`` �r Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. '�f��` �^y Richard G. Ward3rr�, '0 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald "�"" P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11`971 Telephone (516) 765-1939 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 7, 1992 Michelle L. Klima Esseks, Hefter and Angel 108 E. Main Street P.O.Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision Charles Lewis SCTM#1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Ms. Klima: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 6, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency status, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. The proposed project is sensitive to the environmental constraints on the wetlands on the site. No significant environmental impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, �� Bennett Orlowski, J +� Chairman Encl. f :'c o "4: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Roar Mark S. McDonald - P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance April 6 , 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Minor Subdivision Charles Lewis SCTM# : 1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Location: Site is located off a right of way from Lighthouse Road in Southold SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X) Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X ) Description of Action: Subdivision of 2. 2612 acre parcel into 2 lots with areas of 55, 183 and 43,314 square feet. • Page 2 Charles Lewis SEQR Negative Declaration Con' t. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The site contains an important wetland habitat area identified in the National Wetlands Inventory as a Palustrine, scrub/shrub wetland, dominated by broad-leaved deciduous shrubs. The system is identified as being seasonally saturated. This wetland is regulated by the Town Trustees, the submiyyed by the Trustees indicates that the proposed subdivision will not jeopardize the integrity of the wetlands if all new construction is more than 75 feet from the limit of wetlands shown on the map. Adequate building envelopes have been provided by the applicant to satisfy this requirement. The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms of density, each lot is larger than 40,000 square feet. Access to both lots is provided from a 25 foot right of way from Lighthouse Road. Lot 1 shall not have access over the 30 foot right of way shown on the map because use of the right-of-way would require disturbance of the land within 75 feet of the wetland. Zoning Board of Appeals review of access over the 25 foot right-of-way will be necessary before building permits may be issued. The proposed project conforms to Suffolk County Department of Health Services density criteria and sanitary system installation, providing average lot sizes of greater than 40, 000 square feet in Groundwater Management Zone VI . The project is not within the Water Budget area, nor is it within an area served by public water. As a result, Private water supply wells will be used for on-site water s!ipply. Supply well sampling must be performed to the satisfaction of the SCDHS, and potable water supply must be provided in accord with Article IV of the Sanitary Code. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Page 3 Charles Lewis Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: ( 516) 765-1938 CC: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Roger Evans, DEC Commissioner Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Board of Trustees Applicant PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Richard G. Ward, Chairman > 'S". ✓ ��^..., Supervisor George Ritchie Latham.Jr. '—_ n Road Town Hal), 53095 Main Bennett Orlowski.Jr. ` - _ Mark S. McDonald ""' P. O. Box Mai 179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold,New York 11971 Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516) 765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 14, 1993 John Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision for Charles H. Lewis SCTM# 1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Wagner: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday September 13 , 1993 : Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated August 17, 1993 subject to the following conditions: 1. 280-a approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals. 2. There is to be no disturbance or alteration of the soils or vegetation within the 75 buffer area adjacent to the wetland. This restriction must be contained in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. As indicated on the map, there exists a dirt road which provides access to Lot Number 2. It is suggested that an easement be provided over Lot Number 2 for access to Lot Number 1 over the existing dirt road. Charles Lewis September 14, 1993 Page 2 The Planning Board's files contain one map with a stamp dated October 24, 1990, from the Suffolk County Health Department noting that the subdivision is exempt from Article VI, Section 609. Five ( 5) paper copies and two (2) mylars of the final map all containing this stamp must be submitted before the final hearing will be scheduled. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of these maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The sketch plans have been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for review. You will be notified upon receipt of the report from this agency. The Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the report and review of the final maps. Therefore, it is not necessary to prepare the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions at this time. The" sketch plans have also been referred to the Southold Fire District for their recommendation as to whether a firewell is necessary for fire protection. You will be notified under separate cover if the Planning Board will be requiring a firewell as part of any subdivision approval. The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that it is inadequate in size for a reservation of land for park and playground use. Therefore, a cash payment in lieu of land reservation will be required as per Section A106-38 (E) of the Town Code. The amount to be deposited with the Town Board shall be $2,000 . 00 (two thousand dollars per lot for each vacant lot in the subdivision. ) Payment is required prior to any final endorsement of the subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, // It /�4. -h� Richard G. Ward IM5 Chairman . cc: Zoning Board of Appeals Richard Caggiano, Greenport Village Administrator Gerald Hickson, Asst. Superintendent, Water Utility Dept. • 04 Southold Town Planniig Board Town Hall Southold, New York 1..971 Re: Minor Subdivision Gentlemen: S . C .T . M. # 1000-50-03-14 , 15 , ,1 The following statements are offered for your consideration in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its referral to the Suffo. k County Planning Commission: �1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a residential building is proposed. (Z) No new roads are )roposed and no e changes will be made in the grades of the existing roads . (3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing structures are prcposed. You s truly, St phe R. Angelet't'for - Applicant SRA/mlk A torn y and Ag PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS supervisor Richard O.Ward,Chairman George Ritchie Latham,Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski.Jr. - _ - P. O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald '"" Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 14, 1993 John Wagner Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision for Charles H. Lewis SCTM# 1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Wagner: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday September 13, 1993 : Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated August 17, 1993 subject to the following conditions: 1. 280-a approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals. 2. There is to be no disturbance or alteration of the soils or vegetation within the 75 buffer area adjacent to the wetland. This restriction must be contained in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. As indicated on the map, there exists a dirt road which provides access to Lot Number 2. It is suggested that an easement be provided over Lot Number 2 for access to Lot Number 1 over the existing dirt road. Charles Lewis September 14, 1993 Page 2 The Planning Board' s files contain one map with a stamp dated October 24, 1990, from the Suffolk County Health Department noting that the subdivision is exempt from Article VI, Section 609. Five (5) paper copies and two ( 2) mylars of the final map all containing this stamp must be submitted before the final hearing will be scheduled. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of these maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The sketch plans have been referred to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for review. You will be notified upon receipt of the report from this agency. The Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the report and review of the final maps. Therefore, it is not necessary to prepare the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions at this time. The sketch plans have also been referred to the Southold Fire District for their recommendation as to whether a firewell is necessary for fire protection. You will be notified under separate cover if the Planning Board will be requiring a firewell as part of any subdivision approval. The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that it is inadequate in size for a reservation of land for park and playground use. Therefore, a cash payment in lieu of land reservation will be required as per Section A106-38 (E) of the Town Code. The amount to be deposited with the Town Board shall be $2,000. 00 (two thousand dollars per lot for each vacant lot in the subdivision. ) Payment is required prior to any final endorsement of the subdivision. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely,/l ic%n� Q // n/ o�n�I" /(4• A� Richard G. Ward 'mS Chairman cc: Zoning Board of Appeals Richard Caggiano, Greenport Village Administrator Gerald Hickson, Asst. Superintendent, Water Utility Dept. Ess EKS, HEFTER S ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD. N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESsEKS (516) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R. ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER 15161 369-2065 P. O. BOX 570 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 JANE ANN R. KRATz (516) 726-6633 JOHN M. WAGNER WILLIAM POWER MALONEY THOMAS F. WHELAN August 30, 1993 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for Charles H. Lewis, Situate at Southold, Town of Southold -- Suffolk County Tax Map Nos. 1000-050.00-03.00- 014. 000, 015.000, and 016.000 Dear Members of the Board: I enclose, for your use, eight (8) prints of the proposed "Land Division for Charles H. Lewis, last revised August 26, 1993 to show (a) the travelled portions of the rights-of-way providing access to the subject property and (b) the locations of houses and structures within 50 feet of the boundaries of the subject property. If you require anything further, please call. Very truly�you//rs, NOka.,./ John M. Wagner /JW Encls. N-Tniq AUG 3 11993 a s APPEALS B OARD MEMBERS SCOTT L.HARRIS Supervisor CD Gerard R Goehringer, Chairman Go Serge Doyen,Jr. 'Ibwn Hall, 53095 Main Road James Dinizio,Jr. PO. Box 1179 Robert A.Villa Southold, New York 11971 Richard C.Wilton Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 BOARD OF APPEAIS Telephone (516) 765-1800 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM TO: tX I Planning Board Building Department Town Trustees FROM: Board of Appeal 6 1993 DATE: August 5, 1993 D TOWN NING BOARD SLTBJECT: Our Coordination Request for Comments-Preliminary Subdivision Proposal - Charles H. Lewis Property ID #1000-50-3-14, 15, 16 at Southold The applicant and attorney in the above project has confirmed with our office that he has met on a preliminary level with Planning Board Members. Since the application before this Department concerns a request for relief under New York Town Law, Section 280-a over both private rights-of-way, we request your comments and recommended specifications concerning the access within the subdivision created for the proposed flag lot. You should be aware that the attorney for the applicant has indicated that they would be agreeable to continuing a common driveway for access to buildings on both lots rather than creating a new driveway area for the northerly lot. The driveway was previously used for many years as a common driveway for both dwelling structures. The use of a common driveway would not necessarily require a change in the configuration of the flag lot proposed by the Planning Board on the present map. In the event you are not able to transmit your views in writing by August 17, 1993, please feel free to communicate directly either through our office or attendance by a planning staff member at the public hearing. Thank you. lk 00 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �s .i` r? SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman p , j' -", Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. IOi Richard G. Ward .r Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Richard G. Ward, Chairman Ru/ Mf RE: Minor Subdivision Charles H. Lewis Southold SCTM# 1000-50-3-14, 15, 16 DATE: August 11, 1993 The Planning Board has received your Coordination Request for Comments for the above mentioned subdivision proposal. The Planning Board has no objection to your Board granting relief under New York Town Law, Section 280-a over the 251 wide right-of-way. In response to the concerns regarding the driveways within the subdivision, the Board has asked the applicant to submit a map showing the location of all adjacent houses. The Board has reserved commenting on the driveway situation until this map has been submitted and reviewed. In addition, please note that the Planning Board took lead agency and granted a Negative Declaration on April 6, 1992. I have enclosed a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. enc. C�Ga PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn ,? SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 0� -�'S?J','"" �r Supervisor Georgie Ritchie Latham. Jr. `�%!J�"� •3� Richard G. Ward _ `at Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (,516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 7 , 1992 Michelle L. Klima Esseks, Hefter and Angel 108 E. Main Street P.O.Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision Charles Lewis SCTM41000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Ms. Klima: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 6, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency status, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. The proposed project is sensitive to the environmental constraints on the wetlands on the site. No significant environmental impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours., zwar Bennett Orlowski, J of Chairman Encl. AFF Z. �oLH [/ y� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS N "+ • = SCOTT L. HARRIS :- Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman %YL " �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward =, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone 15161 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance April 6, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Minor Subdivision Charles Lewis SCTM# : 1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Location: Site is located off a right of way from Lighthouse Road in Southold SEQR Status : Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X) Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X ) Description of Action: Subdivision of 2. 2612 acre parcel into 2 lots with areas of 55, 183 and 43 , 314 square feet. Page 2 Charles Lewis SEQR Negative Declaration Cont. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The site contains an important wetland habitat area identified in the National Wetlands Inventory as a Palustrine, scrub/shrub wetland, dominated by broad-leaved deciduous shrubs. The system is identified as being seasonally saturated. This wetland is regulated by the Town Trustees, the submiyyed by the Trustees indicates that e oftheowetlandsbifvallonew1ll not constructionriszmoreeintgr thane 75ity feet from the limit of wetlands shown on the map. Adequate building envelopes have been provided by the applicant to satisfy this requirement. The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms of density, each lot is larger than 40,000 square feet. Access to both lots is provided from a 25 foot right of way from Lighthouse Road. Lot 1 shall not have access over the 30 foot right of way shown on the map because use of the right-of-way would require disturbance of the land within 75 feet of the wetland. Zoning Board of Appeals review of access over the 25 foot right-of-way will be necessary before building permits may be issued. The proposed project conforms to Suffolk County Department of Health Services density criteria and sanitary system installation, providing average lot sizes of greater than 40, 000 square feet in Groundwater Management Zone VI . The project is not within the Water Budget area, nor is it within an area served by public water. As a result, private water supply wells will be used for on-site water satPsfactiuppl S well sampling must be performed to the provided in accord with Article pIVaofewater must theSanitaryyCode. be Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Page 3 Charles Lewis Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: ( 516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Roger Evans, DEC Commissioner Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Board of Trustees Applicant • i S�� ms August 4, 1993 ZBA Board of Appeals Town of Southold Att: Linda Kowasky Ref: Petition of Charles H. Lewis To whom it may concern: As the owner of the property next to Mr. Lewis, I have to object to the proposed variance for which he has applied because of the following reasons: 1) The access road to plot 01 would be less than six (6) feet from my house. Two bedrooms and my living room are located at that end of the house, as well as, a section of outside patio. 2) My well is located in the shed that would be right on the access road and within fifty (50) feet of lot #1 and #2 proposed building envelopes. One hundred fifty (150) feet distance from my well would cover almost entirely the building envelope #1. Andre Rubin's well would also be within 150 feet of the proposed lot #1 building envelope. 3) Lot #1 would be turned into a flag lot upon which the town has frowned in the past. 4) My property value would be greatly diminished along with the privacy that I currently enjoy. The Lewis property has not been used in at least the three(3) years that I have owned the property, and the former owner of my home also informed me that it was not used for at least three(3) to five(5) years before that. Please take these objections into consideration before approving this variance. Thapk you, (Rinald A.Mi nor 1a; AUG 6;1993 PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. SuBGrt� P.O. Box 909 04S 54655 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 516-765-5020 FAX 516-765-1797 John T.Metzger,L.S. July 29 , 1993 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road / Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re : Land Division for Charles H. Lewis 1000-50-03-14 , 15 & 16 To whom it may concern: We are submitting the attached four survey prints of the above captioned land division on behalf of John M. Wagner, Esq. , 108 East Main Street , Riverhead, New York, tel . , (516 ) 369-1700. Feel free to contact Mr. Wagner or myself if further information is needed. Thank you. Sincerely, 411J0P. Metzger, S . �I „ry5t JTM/tas Att . JUL 3 01993 ' Jp� ' m5 ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW IOB EAST MAIN STREET P. O. BOX 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (5161369-1700 MARCIA Z. -EFTER WATER MILL OFFICE STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER(516) 369-2065 MONTAUK HIGHWAY JANE ANN R. KRATZ R. 0. BOX 570 JOHN M. WAGNER WATER MILL. N.Y. 11976 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY (516) 726-6633 THOMAS F. WHELAN July 27, 1993 BY HAND Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road 2 9 � P-O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Minor Subdivision for Charles H. Lewis, Situate at Southold, Town of Southold Suffolk County Tax Map Nos. 1000-050.00-03.00- 014.000, 015.000, and 016. 000 Dear Members of the Board: I enclose herewith eight (8) prints of the proposed Land Division for Charles H. Lewis, last revised July 26, 1993 . I ask that you schedule the enclosed plan for sketch plan approval and otherwise proceed with processing of the subdivision. For your information, the subject subdivision has been pending before the Board since 1990. By letter dated February 26, 1992, the Planning Board advised me that dimensional and Town Law §280-a variances were required for the proposed subdivision lots before the Board would proceed with a sketch plan determination. Since that time, I have had a title search performed to determine the legal accesses to the subdivision property. I have also referred the map to Thomas Fisher of the Building Department, as a predicate for an application to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The title search has revealed that the subdivision has deeded easement access over both the 30-foot right-of-way to the southwest of the property and the 25-foot right-of-way to the southeast of the property. I have advised Mr. Fisher of the easement rights associated with the subdivision and he has determined that the front, rear, and side yards of the proposed subdivision lots are located as EssEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW Southold Town Planning Board July 27, 1993 Page 2 shown on the enclosed plat revised July 26, 1993 . Mr. Fisher has also issued a Notice of Disapproval, dated May 24, 1993 , a copy Of which is enclosed. The Notice of Disapproval indicates that the only variance required is from the provisions of Town Law §280-a. Within the past week, I have made application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance of the provisions of Town Law §280-a. While the Zoning Board of Appeals application is pending, there appears to be no reason why the subdivision application should not proceed. Thank you for your cooperation. If you require anything further, please call. Very truly yours, /JW John M. Wagner Encls. • ` ��e i` FORM NO.a TOIVN Or SOUTIIOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOIVN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTIIOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Date . . . . .MAY 24 To , Esseksr Hefter 6 Angel, Attys — a/c CHAS. LEWIS . ., 19 93 " . . . . Boa 279 . Main. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Riverhead, N.Y.. 11901 - - PLEASE TAKE NOTICE thatPP our application dated OCTOBER. . .18 y . ?. . . . . . . . . ., 19 .91 „ for permit to DEVELOPS MINOR SUB—DIVISION OF CHARLES LEWIS Location of Property . _ , , . , LIGHTHOUSE ROAD . ' ' ' ' ' ' . . • • at House No. . . . . . . • . . . . . . . SOIITHOLD, N.Y. County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . . , ,050 . . . . . . . . . . . .Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • •. Block . , 03 14, 15 6H /et Subdivision . CHAS•. IHWIS Lot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Filcd Map No. . . . . . . . . . . . . Lot No. . is returned herewith and disc � � � � � � . . ' " ' ' ' ' ' pproved on the following grounds . , IAG� ACCESS (TOWN LAW 280A) REQUIRED. ACCESS IS OUTSIDE OF SUB—DIVISION SO APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED BY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J IIu ' ding Inspector THOMAS J FISHER ( °M RV 1/80 -,1 € 291998 3 C3 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman p " ® SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham. Jr. ��Q ' - ao\. Supervisor Richard G. Ward F `� Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1939 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 April 7, 1992 Michelle L. Klima Esseks, Hefter and Angel 108 E. Main Street P.O.Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision Charles Lewis SCTMp1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Ms. Klima: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 6, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency status, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. The proposed project is sensitive to the environmental constraints on the wetlands on the site. No significant environmental impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for Your records. Very t�ruull,_y yours, �J Benne` O sk i/ Chairman Encl. • �D,UFfO(,�-c • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman p = SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �,A,f a�`. Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance April 6, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Minor Subdivision Charles Lewis SCTM# : 1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Location: Site is located off a right of way from Lighthouse Road in Southold SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X) Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X ) Description of Action: Subdivision of 2. 2612 acre parcel into 2 lots with areas of 55, 183 and 43, 314 square feet. Page 2 Charles Lewis SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as Planned. The site contains an important wetland habitat area identified in the National Wetlands Inventory as a Palustrine, scrub/shrub wetland, dominated by broad-leaved deciduous shrubs. The system is identified as being seasonally saturated. This wetland is regulated by the Town Trustees, the submiyyed by the Trustees indicates that the proposed subdivision will not jeopardize the integrity of the wetlands if all new construction is more than 75 feet from the limit of wetlands shown on the map. Adequate building envelopes have been provided by the applicant to satisfy this requirement. The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms of density, each lot is larger than 40, 000 square feet. Access to both lots is provided from a 25 foot right of way from Lighthouse Road. Lot 1 shall not have access over the 30 foot right of way shown on the map because use of the right-of-way would require disturbance of the land within 75 feet of the wetland. Zoning Board of Appeals review of access over the 25 foot right-of-way will be necessary before building permits may be issued. The proposed project conforms to Suffolk County Department of Health Services density criteria and sanitary system installation, providing average lot sizes of greater than 40, 000 square feet in Groundwater Management Zone VI . The project is not within the Water Budget area, nor is it within an area served bypublic water. As a result, Private water supply wells will be used for on-site water sarisfactSuppl Sand well sampling must be performed to the Provided in accord with ArticleIV of the water must theSanitaryyCode. be Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Page 3 Charles Lewis Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. For Further Information: Contact Person: Melissa Spiro Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: ( 516) 765-1938 cc: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Planning Commission Roger Evans, DEC Commissioner Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Judith Terry, Town Clerk Board of Trustees Applicant CRAMER, V R OCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS April 2, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Utti Re: Review of EAF Charles Lewis SCTM NO. 1000-50-3-14, 15 and 16 Dear Benny: As per the your request,we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with your correspondence of February 26, 1992. T completed activities are identified as follows: asks and I. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Environmental and Planning Considerations The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The project involves the proposed subdivision of a 2.2612 acre parcel of land into two (2) lots with areas of 55,183 and 43,314 square feet. Approximately 5,000 square feet of the site is identified as wetlands. The site is located north of Sound View Avenue and west of Lighthouse Road, in Southold, New York. The project is an unlisted action, and a Long EAF has been submitted for review and coordination purposes. The subject site is located in an area zoned R-40, allowing residential dwellings based on a yield of 40,000 square foot lots. The site has existing improvements on each lot. A dilapidated structure was observed 75 feet from the wetlands on Lot 1 alongigm with 4 overgrown, indicating that the site has not been ccup eand an old foundation. The areas around d for ome time.ctures are sT'hereis tay dwelling on the east side of Lot 2, along with 3 small sheds. This lot consists of first growth woods vegetation, and light penetration has allowed viney understory to grow. A significant number of locust trees have been downed as a result of wind storms in the fall of 1991. The areas around the structures are also overgrown. The site has variable terrain, with no areas of excessive slopes with the exception of the side slopes of the wetlands area. In addition, the Suffolk County Soil Survey indicates the soil type on site is Montauk Fine Sandy Loam. This soil has moderately Page 1 of 3 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Charles Lewis Long EAF Review slow permeability, and therefore percolation tests will be required to determine suitability for sanitary leaching for new sanitary system construction. The depth to groundwater beneath the site is 80 feet. The wetland area on site is a result of perched water contained in less permeable soils occupying the depression. The site contains an important wetlands habitat area identified in the National Wetlands Inventory as a Palustrine, scrub/shrub wetlands, dominated by broad-leaved deciduous shrubs. The system is identified as being seasonally saturated. Field inventory has confirmed the designation identified in the National Wetlands Inventory. The wetlands was,Joined with a similar small wetlands system to the west; however, the access road has bisected the system. The system is regulated by the Town Trustees, and a report from the Trustees has been prepared indicating that the proposed subdivision will not jeopardize the integrity of the wetlands provided all new construction is in excess of 75 feet from the limit of wetlands shown on the map. Adequate building envelopes are provided to meet this requirement. The remainder of the site did not contain any significant habitats or threatened, endangered or special concern species observed on site during field inspections. The parcel is surrounded by residential development and open space. The proposed project conforms to existing zoning in terms of density, providing lots with an average size of greater than 40,000 square feet. In terms of access there is an existing 30 foot right-of-way on the west side of the parcels which could provide access to Lot 2; however, access to Lot 1 from this right-of-way is not recommended due to the wetlands. Alternate access to both lots is provided from a 25 foot right-of-way from Lighthouse Road. An existing unimproved road asses between existing dwellings to gain access to the lots. A flag connection is provided from Lot 1 to this right-of-way. Zoning Board of Appeals review of access will be necessary, and driveway location for Lot 2 can be determined at the time of building permit review for any new construction which may be contemplated on this lot. The proposed project conforms to Suffolk County Department of Health Services density criteria and sanitary system installation, providing average lot sizes of greater than 40,000 square feet in Groundwater Management Zone VI. The project is not within the Water Budget area, nor is it within an area served by public water. As a result, private water supply wells will be used for on-site water supply. The area is not in an area identified as being affected by nitrate or aldicarb contamination in the North Fork Water Suppplyy Study. Supply well sampling must be performed to the satisfaction of the SCDHS, and potable water supply must be provided in accord with Article IV of the Sanitary Code. Subdivision approval as well as individual lot approval from SCDHS will be required for water supply and sanitary disposal. During this review, the sanitary system design will consider suitability of subsoils for leaching purposes. If poor leaching soils are present, methods are available to backfill with coarse textured soils in order to construct an operable sanitary system. 4. Conclusion and Recommendations Based upon the review of the Long EAF Parts I and 11, site inspection and documentation noted above, we feel that the proposed project does not impinge on environmental constraints on site (wetlands), nor is any significant environmental impact anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The Planning Board approval should specify that all future construction must be in excess of 75 feet from the CRAMER, VCJSOCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 2or3 0 Charles Lewis Long EAF Review identified freshwater wetlands. In addition, Lot 1 shall not have access to the right-of- way from Sound View Avenue, as indicated on the map. Building permits shou d be reviewed for conformance to these conditions when re-development of the site is contemplated. If the Planning Board is in agreement,we feel that the Planning Board could appropriately issue a Negative Declaration, not requiring the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement, based upon the reasons noted above. I hope this letter provides the Board with the information needed to continue review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very trApyoursell , arles J. Voorhis,CEP,AICP enc: Part I/II LEAF CRAMER, V SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 3of3 13-16-2 (2(87)-7c 617.21 • p LC M n Appendix A ; SEQ: State Environmental Quality Review ? SJ Ir. FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT F 4-+ Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an. or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easylNo answer. Frequent ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determ nC significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may u technically expert a environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader t i concerns nvir affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. • Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 7 and. Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: Part 7 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impacts) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared, A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Land Division of Charles H. Lewis Name of Action Sw /7 G �lanh�r, as vc( Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of 15p n I O icir T ( Signature of Responsible Officer 'in Lead A enc P ii b y ignature of Preparer(If rent m r Z 2 le er) SOUTHOLO TOWN Date -., MN(;RQAtN 1� PART 1-PROJECT INFORATION NO�jCE: This doe '' Prepared by Project Sponsor is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant onthe environmen Ple se complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consi a do for a infdrinTa tib approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addi• believe ill be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not in new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and sp each instance. NAME OF ACTION and Division of Charles H. Lewis LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Siteat Address,Municipality and County) North of Sound View Avenue , West of Lighthouse Rd . , at Southold , NY NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Esseks Hefter & Angel Attn : Stephen R. An el Es BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS g , q . (516) 369-1700 108 E . Main St . Box 279 , CITY/Po Riverhead STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER(If different) NY 11901 ADDRESS H. Lewis BUSINESS TELEPHONE t 1 CITY/PO erance DESCRIPTION OF ACTION STATE ZIP CODE XXXXX N8N1W7 lots . Minor Subdivision into two lh ots - of land which presently consists of tree SC 7-M l00c) - r0 _ /4` / s Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overallp�roject, both developed and undeveloped areas. I. Present land use: I urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial VResidential (suburban) ❑forest ❑Agriculture OOther ❑Rural (non-fan X 2. Total acreage of project area: :�7,[6 1 APPROXIMATE ACRE9CE acres. Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) r 70PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Forested �' acres - _ O ,9¢ ------" acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) -- acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres acres Water Surface Area � ---- 4�8 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) �— acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces -- acres — acres Other (Indicate type) Gam. � � acres o / —�_ acres x 3• What is predominant soil t ype(s) on Project a _�.� ( - ro ect site? �/7YQ �/� ,4NDt� cres� ZG acres �� a. Soil drainage: OWell drained e/o of site PwAoderately well drained So Apoorly drained 'z-0 % of site a e. of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through •I of the NYS Land Classification System? 4. Are there bedrock outcro acres. (See 1 NYCRR 37 ppings on project site? OYes //0). o a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5:•'Approximate percentage of prop PC .ct site with slopes: C�'0-10/o ? • o 5—( o L'J70-1590 ��_ 015% or beater Is Project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes MO � '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes x 8. What is the depth of the water table? 5± --�¢._(in feet) �v 8 �" s M k- LJNo �! 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? DYes 0/No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes fX11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened endangered? ❑Yes o According to h v/�C GL ccc>fZD/,.y. O G VA F/�L Identify each species �I['G /pn/ \�12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geol �\ Dyes QAo Describe 1'lO/Jl ,¢QCdfah h� � � ;7 " 7_ _7 / i TE / ogical formations) 13. Is the project site pfesently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes EeNo If yes, explain y14. Does the present si include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes V40 V15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: A1061 e- a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary . 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name 17. Is the site served by existingb. Size (In acres) public utilities? yes ONO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? 11]'Y/es DNo/ b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes No \ , 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, /X Section 303 and 304? Dyes E)Ko f!/19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous�to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? DYes —UI/ LffNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? DYes ONa B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of.project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) 02 . lro a.-Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor s. b. Project acreage to be developed: a•� acres. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped Jacr cres.ly; /c O [7 acres ultimately. d. Length of acres. project, in miles: e. If the (If a I is P appropriate) pro . an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing o; g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ;proposed h. If residential: Number and t (upon completion of Project)? ype of housing units: One Family y Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Ultimately I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure cu height; width: j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will ocOft length. Py is.r id h 3 X* 2. How much natural md4_ria�., rock, earth, etc.) will be removes fr IVO-1,5 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? he site[ tons/tubi DYes ONO �N/A C yard a. If yes, for what intender purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO X 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? D 5. Will any mature orest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? X acres. Dyes No 6. If single phase Project: Anticipated period of construction 7. If multi-phased: IBJ Vc4t months, (including demolition). a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase (number). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year, (including demolition). d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? month _ year. 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes ❑Yes ONO 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction �r6N° 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project after project is complete 11. Will Project require relocation of any projects or facilities?fDyes ONO If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes a. If yes, indicate t (sewage, c.) a type of waste sews e, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? 14. Will surface area of an existing water bodinvolved? XIYes ONo Tyne �C��jnbo l GOA !5` Explain Y increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes pLcl 15. is project or an Project r'.O y Portion of roject located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? a. If yes, what is the amount per month es. No b. If yes, will an existing/ solid waste facility b tons 'S/yON c. If yes, �d/l�F/�� es ONO give name ���� d. Will any wastes not go mto a sewage disposal system or into location /landfi v 'ecy 6 -/C/1 6:z Ue e. If Yes, explain Y y r�i'i2l ll✓ 7 /.eyes ON 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? �No b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? —�— tons/month. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Years. ❑Yes CJJNo 19• Will project routinely Produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels?21. Will project result in an increase in energy r Dyes �No If yes , indicate t gY usp. Dyes p�no type(s) /�/ L �I 22• If water supply is from wells, indicate Pumping �� 23. Total anticipated water usa a er da P P g capacity /�> �_ gallons/minute. 6 P Y G gallons/day, 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes ON/ If Yes, explain r10 4 ^2S. Approvals Required: • • l Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes la'No !T City, Town, Village Planning Board Oyes ONo LcGr.N J ' ,1 City, Town Zoning Board ty; - t L�n Dyes (rNo �r r1-�-4AZ14"Q r 2510 -A City, County Health Department 93'Yes ❑No YV\t (11f `>��h c\nnr vQ9 Other Local Agencies Dyes lZTNo S(2-7 Other Regional Agencies Dyes ONo State Agencies Dyes Cd"No Federal Agencies Dyes O�No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? M/Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment Xzoning variance ❑special use permit IrJsubdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? Z'k4-C) �Esi rJE.v i iia L L or a D�'.vsrr� 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? ' 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? S0.M2 $�2 �,y /C ! 5. What is the maximum potenn M tial development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? f 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a / mile radius of proposed action? CAP 12±i (A tl. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a /, mile? Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed?� t ilt� a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? y win 40 (��Cj 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes ��/� 11 . Will the proposed action create demand for any communis 4eNo fire protection)? Dyes y provided services (recreation, 0 education, police, • a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes - / a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? 6�No Dyes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be an impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. Y adverse E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant)Sponso Name John T. Meter L . S . Signature Date 10/2/91 Title "and S•tt�,� for AnP-11LA t If the action is m the Coastal Area(nnd you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 P,( 2-VOJECT IMPACTS AND 1( 1AGNITUDE General Information (Read Carefully) Responsibitiiy of Lead Agency • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations beer reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The irrlpacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 7 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 1KN0 OYES • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ 3 feet. 13 ❑Yes ❑No • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. [) • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ Dyes ❑No El 3 feet of existing ground surface. E3 Dyes ❑No • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ than one phase or stage. ❑Yes ❑No • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ • Construction in a designated floodway. Cl ❑1'es ❑No ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect t=.. ..,,y un,que or unusual land f rms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.))NNO OYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 3. Will pro IMPACIN WATER , Proposed action affecBe t any water body Small.to 2 3 (Under Articles 15, 2a, 25 of the Environmental Conserva ion Law, ECL Potential Y designated as Protected? Moderate Can Impact rated y Examples that ) Impact Ira Mitigated By • Developablewould apply to column 2 /NNO ❑YES Pact Project Change area of site contains a protected water body. • Dredging more than 100 cubic Protected stream. Yards of material from ❑ • Extension of utility distribution facilities throughm channel of a ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a deli a Protected water body. ❑ ❑ ED Yes ON. • Other i ionated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO 4. Will ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO of waterposed action affect any non- Dyes protected existin ONO Examples that would a �$j °f new body • A 10% increase PPIY to column 2 !'(NO ❑YES or more than a 70ra decrease Seh surface area • Construction of a body decrease. of any body of water • Other y of water that exceeds 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No mpacts: of surface area. 5 Will Pro ❑ a Dyes ONO Proposed Action affect surface Dyes quality or quantity? °r groundwater ❑No Examples that would apply • Proposed Action will to column 2 � `NO [DYES re • Proposed - quire a discharge Permit. Action requires have approval to serve use of a source of ❑ Proposed (Project) Water that does not ❑ • Proposed Action re I ) action. ❑ Dyes ❑No gallons Per minute pumpmter supply from wells with g 4S ❑ Dyes ONO Construc. supply system, r operation causianbaany contamination °fester than ❑ ❑No ❑ ❑Yes Proposed Action will a water ❑ • Liquid effluent will be adversely affect ❑ do not exist or c°nve� groundwater. ❑Yes ONO have ' rd off the site to facilities which presently ❑ • Proposed Action inadequate capacity. ❑ would use ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No day, water in excess of Dyes• Proposed 20,000 gallons per ONO P Action will likely cai;se siltation or other dischar. ❑ existing body o(wa ter to the exte ❑ ❑Yes contrast to t that t , e into an ONO naturai conditions. here will be an obvious visual ❑ Proposed :Xction will re ❑ ❑Yes products greater tha q°ne the Stora ON. n 7,100 storage °f Petroleum or clic Proposed Action will gallons, Chemical ❑ and/or sewer services.allow residential uses in areas ❑ without [Dyes ONO Proposed Action locates co ut water ❑ equire new or ex commercial l and/or industrial uses ❑ ❑Yes acilities. expansion of existing which may ON. Ither g waste treatment and/or storage ❑ impacts: ❑ Dyes ONO Hill proposed action alter drains 13 ❑ ramPles pater runoffs drainage or Yes ONO =posed that apply to Patte�rgs, or surface would a Y colo flow �j Action would than mO 2 IQ1N0 AYES change flood water (lows. ❑Yes ONO C � Sm0o 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By • Proposed Action may Impact Impact Project Change y cause substantial erosion. • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ • Proposed Action will allow ❑ ❑ es ❑No development in a designated ❑ • Other impacts: gnated floodway. ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ Dyes ONO IMPACT ON AIR ❑ ❑Yes ONO 7 Will proposed action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 XNO OYES • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle tris in an hour. P • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of y given ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO refuse per hour. more than 1 ton of • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's . per hour ora [� ❑ • Proposed action will allow an increase in the per hour. Dyes ONO to industrial use. mount of land committed • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ED Yes ONO ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO IMPACT ON PLANTS Will Proposed AND ANIMALS P Action affect any threatened or endan red species? Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or NO OYES pecies list, using the site, overornear site ore oundd on ton he tfhe site. or Federal Removal of an ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO y Portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a ❑ than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Other Year, other ❑ ❑ Dyes impacts: ONO I Will Proposed ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No P Action substantially affect non-threate ed or non-endangered species? Examples that would a NO OYES roposed PPIY to column 2 i Action would to interfere with any resident or 'gratory list,, shellfish or wildlife species. oposed ❑ ❑ Action requires the removal of ❑Yes ONO mature forest (over 100 more than 10 acres 6etation. Years of age) or other locally Important ❑ ❑ Dyes IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND ONO Nill the Proposed Action affect agricultural RESOURCES land res�j urces? xamples that would apply to column 2 O OYES - Proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural I 1 (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) ❑ Dyes ONO 8 y 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact l3e (i Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑yes ONO of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more ❑ ❑ than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. ❑Yes ONO • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, ❑ ❑ strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm Oyes ONO field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 • Will Proposed action affect aesthetic resources? XNO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21 Appendix a.) - Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed and uses, or ect • or in sharp)contrast to current suror undingtlandviously usse patterns, whether man-made or natural. ent from ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their ❑ ❑ enjoyment of the aesthetic ❑Yes ONO • Project componentsqualities of that resource. that will result in the elimination or significant screening Of scenic views known to be important ❑ ❑ • Other impacts: portant to the area. Oyes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? (� Examples that would apply osed Act' to column 2 /ZNO OYES Prolly of • contiguous u to any facility or site listed on theStatly eor Nationthin or al Register ❑ of historic places. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. ❑ • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ Oyes ONO archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. ❑ • Other impacts: ❑ Oyes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑YesONO IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column ) The Permanent foreclosure of a future recreational otNO OYES • A major reduction of a Portunity. n open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO ❑ ❑Yes ONO 9 IMPACT ON 14. Will there be an effect to TR•s transportation y 2 existing Small to 3 s st msi' Potential Can Im Examples that would a Moderate Large pact Be PPIY to column 2 NO DYES Impact Mitigated By _.Jtera[ion of Impact Project Chan Present patterns of move ge • Proposed Action will result in movement of people and/or • Other impacts: major problems.or traffic Goods. [� ❑ ems. ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ Oyes ED No ❑ IMPACT ON ENERGY ❑Yes ONO 15. Will proposed action affect the community's so energy supply) c Y Examples that would a of fuel or Proposed Action will ca pply to column 2 ANO AYES any form of energy use a in the greater than 5% increasen the use of municipality. i (� • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ transmission or supplyED yes ONO residences or to sve system rna °�orve ❑ sint commercial alcor industrial al use. e or wo family ❑ • Otlter impacts: ❑Yes ONO pacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO NOISE AND ODOR IMpgCTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors Of the Proposed Action? noise, or vibraJN as a result Examples that would apply to column 2 BlastingO DYES within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility, . its will occur routinely (more than one hour ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will per day). O ambient noise levels for Produce ouui[Jeto( structures ❑ exceedingthe local ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ' Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that ❑ Oyes ONO noise screen. would act as a Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT O ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO Will Proposed Action affect PUBLIC HEALTH public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 NO DYES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances(iu oil, Pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the eve accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic lowOf ❑ ❑ discharge or emission. event el ❑Yes ONO level Proposed Action may Y result in the burial of "hazardous wastes,, ' (i.e. toxic, Poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive to any infectious, etc.) ❑ ❑ irritating, ❑Yea ❑No I Storage facilities for one million or ,as or other flammable liquids, more gallons of liquified natural 'roposed action may result in the ❑ ❑ +ithin 2 excavation or other disturbance El yes ONO 000 feet o( a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑NO �t•.... impacts. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No / 10 I IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 1 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential ' Can Impact Be 18. Will Proposed action affect the character of the exist n communit r Moderate Large Mitigated By (� P P `i l�ryg y Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 �NO AYES • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ E3 ❑Yes ❑No ❑ or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No' • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ El 11 Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ Cl ❑Yes ONO 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controver y related to Potential adverse environmental impacts? O OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Part 3 must be prepared if one or more imResponsibility of Lead Agency mitigated. Pacts) is considered to be Potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact b 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. ' P y project change(s). To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact (Continue on attachments) 11 ? 1 rA PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y _ Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman d " �• SCOTT L. HARRIS �' George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor� %;+�j'�-� 9t` �' Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald _ �� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OFPOFax (516) 765-1823 e ruary 25, 1992 Michelle L. Klima Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 E. Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision of Charles Lewis SCTM#1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Ms. Klima: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 24, 1992. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Veerly_ truly yours, �i Bennett Orlowski, j � Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals p t i • gUFF04 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y r Z Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward 4 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 26, 1992 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Charles Lewis SCTM#1000-50-3-14, 15 16 Dear Messrs. Voorhis and Cramer: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Also enclosed is a copy of the map, a copy of the report from the Trustees and Planning Board correspondence dated February 26, 1992 and February 25, 1992. The planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on February 24, 1992. The $400. 00 review fee has been submitted by the applicant. If all is in order, the Board will make their SEQRA determination at the April 6th public meeting. Please submit your report no later than March 30th in order for the Board to review your report before the meeting date. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. /J"s Chairman Encls. NLI O�gUEEO P� TRUSTEES John M.Bredemeyer,III,President o t 1 SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith,Vice President W A = SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski,Jr. p John L.Bednosid,Jr. Town Hall John B.Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Planning Board FROM: Board of Trustees RE: Subdivision of Charles Lewis SCTM #1000-50-3-14,15,16 DATE: May 9, 1991 The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on Thursday, May 2, 1991: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees accepts and forwards the April 17, 1991 report of Consultant Bruce Anderson to the Planning Board. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. JMB:jmt enc. cc: CAC Bruce Anderson • Environmental Consultant D To: John Bredemeyer , President Southold Board of Trustees From: Bruce Anderson TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Environmental Consultant Date: April 17 , 1991 Re: Environmental Review - Subdivision Charles Lewis Situate n/o Sound View Ave w/o Lighthouse Road SCTM # 1000-50-3-14, 15 , 16 Subject parcel contains 2. 2612 acres and is located in an R-40 zoning district. The applicant proposes to subdivide the parcel into two lots . On the survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors dated November 20 , 1989 , proposed lot #1 contains 1 . 2005 acres . Proposed lot #2 contains 1 . 0607 acres . Proposed lot #1 contains wetlands . Lot #2 is comprised entirely of upland vegetative communities . The wetland found on proposed lot #1 is generally characterized as a buttonbush - swamp loosestrife wetland. The size and shape of the wetlands found on site appear to accurately reflect the existing wetlands . The wetland system is actually split by the previous construction of the gravel unimproved road used to access the site . Wetlands are similar in nature west of the gravel road but appear to be much larger than those found on subject parcel. Wetlands on subject parcel were flagged during the field inspection of April 14 , 1991 . Soils underlying the wetland are quite mucky and the wetland is regarded as having been formed as a result of the soils . Perched above the water table , this wetland collects standing water as a result of overland runoff . The standing water, present during the time of field inspections may disappear during periods of extended drought . However , it appears that standing water has sustained itself for most if not all of this year as evidenced by the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation. The uplands are generally wooded and contain two dilapidated buildings , eight sheds also in dilapidated condition and the remains of an old foundation. In and around these structures , the land has been most recently disturbed . The woodlands are characterized as early successional . The presence of mature black locust which 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 dominate the woodlands area are typically considered indicators of disturbed lands . However , a rather lush shrub understory has become established throughout the upland/woodland areas . The following species were identified within the wetlands area: Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis Swamp loosestrife Decodon vertillatus Common greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia Cat brier Smilax glauca Black tupelo Nyssa sylvatica Water milfoil Myrophyllum spp. Slender spikerush Eleocharis spp. Highbush blueberry Vaccinium corymbossum Dead decaying trees The following species were observed in the uplands Portion of the site : Black locust Robinia psuedo-acacia White oak Quercus alba Grey birch Betula populifolia Flowering dogwood Cornus Florida Pignut hickory Cary a labra Red cedar g White Cedar Juniperusocc occidentalis Red raspberry Thuja occidentalis Rhubus idaeus Black raspberry Rhubus occidentalis Blackberry Common elderberry Rhubus allegheniensis Scotch broom y Sambucus canadensis Green brier CYstis scoparius Cat brier Smilax rotundifolia Cross vine Smilax glauca Virginiaacreeper Bignonia capreolata Poison c Parthenocissus quinquifolia Rhus radicans Recommendations : 1- The wetlands as shown on the survey prepared by Peconic Associates appears to adequately portray the size and Shape of the existing wetlands on site. These wetlands have been flagged. The Trustees may wish to have the flagged wetland boundary placed upon the survey. However , it is unlikely that such a formal wetland delineation will have any effect upon the subdivision yield of the property. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971—(516—) 7-65-4-07-1 --- 2- The existing transitional and upland habitats from eisting #le wetlands distanceextend scalesetoxapproximatelyn75ofeetofromdthlo et freshwater wetlands above which has been disturbed by clearing in and around subject dwellings . Given the existing setback from the wetlands , there appears to be more than sufficient room further east for future housing construction . It would therefore seem logical and reasonable for any future dwelling to be located not closer than 75 feet to wetlands . It is recommended that a building envelop be located on the survey of the proposed subdivision reflecting a setback of at least 75 feet from the freshwater wetlands . .s- It is recommended that lands within 75 feet of the wetlands be retained in their natural condition . 4- The probable redevelopment of the dwelling on proposed lot -1 should be regulated as to prevent erosion into the natural areas within 75 feet of the wetlands . This preventative technique is usually accomplished by the use of haybales placed end to end and firmly staked into the ground . The Trustees may wish to make such a recommendation. «� J 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY-1-19-71—(5-16) 765-4071 ��osu�Fot 5 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O '- _ SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Su p ervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald ��Yv Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 John Wagner February 26, 1992 Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision for Charles H. Lewis SCTM# 1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Wagner: The Planning Board has reviewed the maps dated October 30, 1991 for the above mentioned subdivision. Neither lot conforms to all of the requirements of the Bulk Schedule for the R-40 Zoning District. Therefore, variances for these lots will be required before the Planning Board can proceed with the sketch determination. In addition, access to the lots is over land other than that owned by the subdivider. Therefore, you will need to obtain 280-A access approval. The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on February 24, 1992. You will receive a copy of that resolution under separate cover. Please contact this office if you have any questions 'regarding the above. Very truly your, Bennett Orlowski, J/mf Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals �13FFat PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS i Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman `a O �`� y SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. by _ Supervisor ��.ry, Richard G. Ward , { _-.3 Mark S. McDonald Town Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OFSOYTHOLD February 25, 1992 Fax (516) 765-1823 Michelle L. Klima Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 E. Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision of Charles Lewis SCTM#1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Ms. Klima: The Planning Board watgarMeeting os heldondMonday, February t24, 1992. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, / Bennett Orlowski, J 121s� Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals 14.16-2 (2/87)-7c • 617.21 \ p °/7 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review j ''� Iq�, I SEQs �'• FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT F Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be,significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine t significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert a environmental analysis. In addition,many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby a Process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flex ble toallow i t odu t o�n of es Informal ornto f ttathdetermination project ora tion. • Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially. large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: tUpon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and t3 if appropriate),❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead a • and any other supporting agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared, A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Land Division of Charles H. Lewis Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer ( Signature of Responsible OF(icer fn Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 —� PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This doc `' is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe on the environmen Pie se complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considers do for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition infdrrii tI' believe ill be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spec, each instance. I F ACTION and Division Of Charles H. Lewis N OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) h of Sound View Avenue , West of Lighthouse Rd . , at BUSINESSTd , NE F APPLICANTISPONSOR 51 6) 3 59-1700 ks Hefter 6 An el Attn: Stephen R. Angel , Esq . t S E. Main St . Box 279 , STATE Zip CODE NY 11901rhead BUSINESS TELEPHONE OF OWNER(If different) SSer rice STATE ZIP CODE O XXXXX N8N1W7 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor Subdivision into two lots of land which presently consists of thre. lots . Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall ciect, both developed and undeveloped areas. �( 1. Present land use: U]Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-f, ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other y 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACRE,jCE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIO acres acr: Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) O• O, / acres / aen Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres act Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) O. / acres 0, / act acres act Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres act acr Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres n Other (Indicate type) C A"`^ �' G acres act 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through •1 of the Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 3770). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes M/o a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5.'Approximate percentage of ro P P4o Pc .ct site with slopes: Y0-10% 10-15% S Is Project substantially contiguous to, or co ❑15% or greater o main a building, site, or distri Registers of Historic Places? ct, listed on the tate or the National i El ONO Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes i`( 8 f'1No What is the depth of the water table? �.5_ (in feet) i1 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer?- /10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing ❑Yes _"° opportunities presently exist in the project area? 11. Does project site Dyes o According to contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened endangered? ./ Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes C', 0 Describe 13. Is the project site Pfesently used b the y Dyes [ y communis or neighborhood :a:S::an::o:P:e:n::sP:aCeoIf yes, explain or recreation area? 'N 14 Does the present sine include scenic views ❑Yes o known to be important to the community? 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: Name �( 17. Is the site served by existin b. Size (In acres) /( a) If Yes, does sufficient capacitylexist htoeallow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessar es ON \ , 18. Is the site located in an a y to allow Pursuaw connection? ❑Yes [7�� /X gricultural district certified No Section 303 and 304? Dyes nt to Agriculture and Markets Law, �79. Is the site located in or substantially contiguo�us�o a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant ttocle Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes L7No 20- Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes /No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of.project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) x a.-Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: U acres. c. Project acreage to remain undevelopedacres initially; �7 acres ultimately. d. Length of project, in miles: �— acres. e. If the (If appropriate) project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing t;. Maximum vehicular tri s ��; Proposed Y h. If residential: Number and type of housing ted per hour �_ (upon completion of project)? Pe units: One Family Two Family Initially L y l Multipe Family�— Y _ . Condominium Ultimately i. Dimensions �--� �-- (in feet) of largest proposed structure - j. Linear feet of frontage alonga g height �— Public thoroughfare Project will occupyw'dth; length. is? � ft. 3 tons/cubic yards, ,Y 2. How much natural SriaA-„ e., rock, earth, etc.) will be re ,,moved from the site? / 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ONO Lr4/N/A �Y a. If yes, for what intender: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. X 5, Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes ( No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: Q V1% a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑YeAs\\` 36No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction IV 1� after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 04 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes ONO If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes 11A a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes VNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ,�:PNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project Iota:; In a 100 =ar flood plain? Dyes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONO C. If yes, give name ; location — --- d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ONO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes IVNo ~a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes (JJNo 19. Will project routinely Produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes /PNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes /01N0 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Dyes )No If yes , indicate type(s) I is from wells, indicate pumping capacity /” gallons/minute. X 22. If water supply 23. Total anticipated water usage per day Goff" gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes UIN0 If Yes, explain 4 ^25- Approvals Required: • • {� Type l Submittal City, Town, Village Board Date City, Town, Village Planning Board Dyes ❑No .' Oyes No City, Town Zoning Board Dye City, County Health Department Qly-es C�No l tvl Yes ONo `f�c t� Other Local Agencies . YraV-0 q (� •--r Iq� Dyes fZ1No - -t-4_L Other Regional Agencies State Ageneses Dyes 121No Dyes Q(No Federal Agencies -- Dees ErNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? If Yes, indicate decision required: '""es ONNo Ozoning amendment Ozoning variance Ospecial use permit '-'subdivision Onew/revision of master plan Oresource management plan ❑other ❑site plan 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 1Z—yz) 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? T,,2Q, c��S 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5cLYhq S• What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? T � f 7.6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes ❑ What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/. mile radius of No proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ' 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many mile? Yes ONo lots are proposed? t t� a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? 11 . Will the proposed actin create demand for an (a,G fire protection)? Dyes o Dyes Y community provided services (recreation, education, 0 - a. If yes, is existing Police, cient cted 12. Will the Proposed action result in thesufgeneration generati nuof Itrafficesignificantly demand? eD present leyes vels? Dyes a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. Dyes ❑Yes 63N 6 Q o D. Informational Details ONo Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your posal, please discuss such impacts and the measues which You avoid them. proles[. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your pro Y propose to mitigate or E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge Applicant/Sponsor Name John T. Metzger Signature Date 10/2/91 If the action is to the Co Title T.and S,u Coastal grea�nd you are a state agency, ��� for Anp 1 i can= wills Ihis assessment. y, complete the Coastal Assessment Form beforero p seeding 5 i Ptd 2 JROJECT IMPACTS AND 1(, _Ih MAGNITUDE Responsib;:Ity of Lead Agency General information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of e generally applicable throughout the State and magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples ar les andlor lower thresholds may be appropriate for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examp for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The irrlpacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. An Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. or 1 to c. If answering Yes to a question then check the impact If impactthreshold equals or exceeds any example provided ,(column lcheckcolumn2if indicate hpotential mpactwill occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. 3. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART by change(s) in the pto e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated project to s small not possible. moderasible. Thi impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is must be explained in Part 3. 2 FE]Yes Small to Potential Be Moderate LargeBy ES IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact nge 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to t❑ projectNO ❑Yte? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ No • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%• ❑ ❑No• Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑3 feet. ❑ ❑No • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. n ❑ ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑Nc than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N� tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑N, • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ Dyes ON, • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑N- • Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect h.. _,y ur:.que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO OYES ❑ ❑ Dyes ON • Specific land forms: 6 • c ---- ----- - 3. Will IMPACT ON WATER I (UnderrOPosed action affect any water body 2 Articles 15, 2q, 25 of the Environmental Small.to Potential 3 gnated as Protected? Moderate Examples that would a Conservation Law, ECL Large Can Impact Be • Developable PPIy to column 2 ) Impact Im Mitigated By Fable area of ONO OYES Pact Project Change • Dred site contains a Protected Dredging more than 100 cubic water body, Protected stream. Yards of ❑ material from channel of a ❑ • Extension of utility distribution facilities throw ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo ' Construction in a designated gh a ❑Yes • Other freshwater Protected water body. ONo impacts: or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ 0 ❑Yes ONO q. Will proposed action O ❑Yes ONO Of water? affect any non-protectedO ❑Yes existing or new body ❑No Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease en the surface ONO OyES or more than a 10 acre increase • Construction of a body area of any body of water or decrease. ❑ • Other Y °f water that exceeds 70 acres ❑ impacts: ❑Yes ONo of surface area. ❑ 5- Will Proposed Action affect surface or ❑ O Oyes ❑ ONO quality or qu,rntetyt groundwater Oyes ONO Examples that would apply to column 2 OYE • Proposed Action ONO S Will require a discharge permit. • havoeoPP apprctioval requires use a a e of • Proposed Actio to serve proposed (Projource Of ect) actio seater that does not ❑ O gallons n fequires water su n. ❑ ❑Yes ONO Per minute pumping ca PPIy from wells with ❑Yes • Construct- or Pacity. Greater than q5 ONo supply system, Operation causing any contamination ❑ ❑ • Proposed Actio ° of a ❑Yes ❑N0 n will a water O ' Liquid effluent will be dversety affect ❑ d0 not exist conveyed off groundwater. ❑Yes or have made the site to facilities w ONo ' Proposed Action equate capacity, which O ❑ ❑Yes day, would use water in ex ❑ cess ❑Yes ONo Proposed Actio °f 20.000 gallons per ONo existin ° will likely cause seltatio ❑ g body of waver to the exte�t that therer Other ❑ ❑Yes contrast t. natura' an ob r ONO Proposed t cOndtttons, will be an obv ousnto an ❑ fiction well visual ❑ products greater require the Stora � ❑Yes ONo than 1,100 gallons, be of Petroleum Proposed Action will allow mor chemical ❑ -n or sewer residential uses in areas ❑ services Oyes'quire eroposd Actio without water ONO Action locates commercial and/or industrial ❑ 'quire new or expansion of existing waste ❑ cilitieS. uses which may ❑Yes ONo ther treatment and/or storage ❑ impacts: ❑ ❑yes ONo 'ell proposed action alter drama ❑ ❑ iter runoffr ge flow or ❑Yes Pies that would a Patterns, or surface ON. m PPI osed Action would y to column 2 ONO OYES change flood water flows. 7 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. i • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS d. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 rhe proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No :and (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 7 Small to Potential ' 3 Moderate Can Impact Be Impact Large Mitigated By • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil Impact Project Change agricultural land, profile of 0 • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ayes ONO of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • The proposed action would disrupt or land management systems p Prevent installation of agricultural strap cropping)- (eg, subsurface drain Ines, outlet ditches, ❑ ❑ 61 or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm aYQ5 ONO field to drain Poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: a ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed action affect aesthetic resourcesf ❑I.Ip ❑yE5 A necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land Pr in sed uses, or project components obviously different from p contrast to current ether surrounding land use patterns, whether o ❑ ❑Yes ❑No man-made or natural. • Proposed land roject aesthetic resourceseWhicch Will eliminate por significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic ts visible to users of p ❑ Project co qualities of that resource. ayes ONO mponents that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important• Other impacts: Portant to the area, ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ayes ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre historic or paleontological ;mportancef ExamPles that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action Occurring ON OYES contiguous to any facility or site listed on thePartia •torn or substantially of historic places. ❑ ❑ • Any iruPact to an archaeological National Register ❑Yes ONO project site. brcal site or fossil bed located within the Acti Proposed ical sites will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ archaeological sites on the NYS ayes ❑Nn • Other impacts: Site Inventory. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ayes ONO IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of future open spaces or recreational Opportunities? ExamPles that would aY existing or apply The to column • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational Opportunity. • A major reduction of an o ❑Ntu OYES • Other impacts: Pen space important to thCom n rnity. a El ❑ ❑Yes ONO El ❑ ayes ONO ❑ ❑Yes ONO 9 l y 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation syst ms? Moderate Large Mitigated By NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 _.Iteration of present patterns of movement of people andfor goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sou Of of fuel or energy supply? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than S% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ Dyes []No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibratVN as a result of the Proposed Action? O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • rrs will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ Dyes LINO noise screen. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed'Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous Cl ❑ Dyes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous r w; t7t...., impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 1 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 2 3 � 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Small to Potential ' Can Impact . Moderate Large Mitigated BeB Examples that would apply to column 2 EINO OYES Impact Impact Project Change • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. ❑ ❑ • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. ❑ Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans ro goals. ❑ 13 Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ E3 Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ❑ • Proposed Action will set an important ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will precedent for future projects. create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No ❑ El Yes 0J No Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to Potential adverse environmental impacts? ❑NO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Part 3Responsibility of Lead Agency mitigated. morim must be prepared if one or e pacts) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may 6e Instructions Discuss the following for each ' part 2:mpact identified in Column 2 of 1. Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the im r tant. • The duration of the impaPt ct occurring • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional conse quence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs • Whether known objections to the prgoals oject and dtgto this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 14.14-11 G.97)-9c • C 617.21 Appendix B SEQR State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional in the Full EAF.form relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility Distance Between 1. Would the project be visible from: Project and Resource (in Miles) • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available B I/4 /4 '/2 /z 3 3-5 5+ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation El ❑ ❑ ❑ C] of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State Parks? • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Park Service lands? • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic C1 11 E3 ❑ E3or Recreational? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for ❑ C1 ❑ El establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ • Municipal park, or designated open space? • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ONO 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ONO of Year 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMEN'. 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *1/4 mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ Cl Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: 11/2 mile ❑Yes *1 miles ❑Yes ❑No *2 miles ❑Yes ❑No *3 miles []Yes C1 No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while FREQUENCY the proposed action is Holidays/ Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Activity ❑ ❑ El Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS -4 C6 r , a Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman p i ' SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. .�L'-- f 0� fr Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 John Wagner February 26, 1992 Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision for Charles H. Lewis SCTM# 1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Wagner: The Planning Board has reviewed the maps dated October 30, 1991 for the above mentioned subdivision. Neither lot conforms to all of the requirements of the Bulk Schedule for the R-40 Zoning District. Therefore, variances for these lots will be required before the Planning Board can proceed with the sketch determination. In addition, access to the lots is over land other than that owned by the subdivider. Therefore, you will need to obtain 280-A access approval. The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on February 24, 1992. You will receive a copy of that resolution under separate cover. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly your, Bennett Orlowski, J/wf Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals y-r.2zz,> SUFF01 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS CZ Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman p '`% T SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Superk isor Richard G. Ward ,( t Mark McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kennethh L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 f e�ruor� 26, 1972- RE: 972RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYC part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2 . Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist Project Name: you in your response. e.�a e �.ew1S 5oILI 15 6- Requested Requested Action: �eSj taQ S�hA' ac e SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( X ) Unlisted Contact Person: /Ylel(5ira_4 Sc�rao (S16) 765 1938 • i The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty the date of this letter, wheplease respond in writinge ( 30) days of have an interest in being lead agency- Planning or not you Planning Board Position: ( X ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming status for this action. g lead agency ( ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: �1 u.L� "I o zV /!y Please feel free to contact this Office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski ms Jr. cc: Board of Appeals Chairman Board of Trustees HF4L1�l n T _ Southold Town Board *Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services vNYSDEC - Stony Brook *NYSDEC - Albany c C heat ..a '•� nfi_ i.F m�_ * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies % .1.14-16-2 (2187)-7c • RR 617.21 D 6 L...� nn Appendix A ; SED. State Environmental Quality Review .ji7 — li �. FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT F �J Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in anWN or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy tto eanswer. Frequent ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determ nc significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmenta analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. • Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance ato whether an impact ilikely be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. t. The form also identifies whether her an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 reformation, and considering both theation ded on magitudesandF importance of each Impact, it is reasonably determined b (Parts appropriate), and any other supporting lead agency that: y the ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.• ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he prepared, A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Land Division of Charles H. Lewis Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency , Title of Responsible Officer ( Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 !M PART 1—PROJECT INFO[AmATION 1� Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This doc ( is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe ori the environmen Ple se complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consider �y pa do for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additior infofintatto believe ill be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and speci each instance. NAME OF ACTION Land Division of Charles H. Lewis LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) North of Sound View Avenue , West of Lighthouse Rd . , at Southold , NY NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Esseks Hefter & Angel Attn : Stephen R. Angel, Esq . (516) 369-1700 ADDRESS 108 E. Main St . , Box 279 , - CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Riverhead NAME OF OWNER(it ditterent) BUSINESSSTELEPHONE T 11901 Charles H. Lewis ( ) ADDRESS 71 0 s er nce STATE ZIP CODE CITY/PO XXXXX N8N1[d7 Tecumseh , Ontario DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Minor Subdivision into two lots - of land which presently consists of three lots . Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description y Physical setting of overall roject, both developed and undeveloped areas. burban) ❑Rural (non-f 1. Present land use: (HUrban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (su ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other y 2. Total acreage of project area: ?•T-61 acres. APPROXIMATE ACRE,9GE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIO Meadow or Orushland (Non-agricultural) O' c' acres O, acr: Forested • / acres / acr Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acr Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECU D' acres 0, / acr Water Surface Area acres acr Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acr Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acr Other (Indicate type) -A., O• G acres l>. acr 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: OWell drained % of site ❑Moderately well drained of site ❑Poorly drained Z-O % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through •1 of the Land Classification System? — acres. (See 1 NYCRR 3/770). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes C1TNo a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5�pproxlmate percentage of prod pC .ct site with slopes: 00-10% of i [J/10_1 5 4% 015% or greater Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the Sta Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes ONO te or the National i X� '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table? �6e S--` 9. Is site located over a (in feet) Oyes INo primary, principal, or sole source aquifer?- Dyes 0/No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes �� 11. Does C7No project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified ❑Yes o According to as threatened or endangered? Identify each species f12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? /\ Oyes 'QAO Describe (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) 13. Is the project site pfesently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes o If yes, explain Y14. Does the present sits include scenic views known to be important to the community? Oyes o 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: / : a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: \ , a. Name X 17. Is the site served b b. Size (In acres) V existing public utilities? Yes ❑NI0 / Ca) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? lla ❑ / b) If Yes, will improvements be necessaryto allow connection. ❑Yes N(� 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified ? No pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Ye5 �o 1 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous��((o a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 /( of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 677? Oyes E No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a,—Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 6) 6. Project acreage to be developed: 0 acres. c. Project acreage to remain undevelope acres initially; f7 -- acres ultimately, d. Length of project, in miles: �— acres. e. If the project (If appropriate) P lectis an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed -" I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing — %; generated 9. Maximum vehicular trips Proposed h. If residential: Number and per hour (upon completion of project)? VPe of housing units: One Family Two. Family Initially - L V Multiple Family Condominium Ultimately �— i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest b proposed structure height; — j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thg width; length. oroughfare project will occupy is? -men O ft. 3 X 2. How much natural mCi, ,i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removea fi-.n the site? tons/cubic yards, / 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ONO 9?(N/A a. If yes, for what intender: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO X4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? X Dyes IDNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 1V 7. If multi-phased: `VQ4t a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes IZSNo Q 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction A ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project. 11. Will p o'ect require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes ONO If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes �No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ON Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ,F;N0 Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes ONO. 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes /ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONO c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ONO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes 9(N0 Via. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes 91No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes '010 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes /0'No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Dyes �No If yes , indicate type(s) - X22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. / 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes 040 If Yes, explain - -- 4 125. Approvals Required: • Type Submittal City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes f2�No Date ' City, Town, Village Planning Board Oyes ❑No - Cit y, Town Zoning Board Dyes 2rNo City, County Health Department ud�.,� nn Yes ❑No '�t (\1S Other Local Agencies Dyes fr1No Other Regional Agencies Dyes f1(No State Agencies ❑Yes Cd'No Federal Agencies - Dyes ErNo -------------- C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? / If Yes, indicate decision required: l�Yes ❑NO ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit 'resubdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Z' �}l� 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as Tu--1� P permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5,1,VY\�!" 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? f 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land ---4— use plans? Yes ONO 7- What are the predominant land use /,s) and zoning classifications within a ' mile radius of proposed action? G D. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin ing/surroundin& land uses within a '� mile Yes 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how ❑No a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? +'\ n7is are proposed?� t ivt� n 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes 11 . Will the proposed action create demand for any communis fire protection)? ❑Yes o o Y provided services (recreation, education, police, a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes - / a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Flo D1 Informational Details ❑Yes ❑No Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify project, impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures wfeh YOUproposeto n avoid them. y be any adverse utigate or E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge, Applicant/Spons�oor.))Name John T. Metzger L . S. SignatureS.�'y:_ —�—L � 71--fir— Date 10/2/91 If the action isin the Coastal Arca nd you are a stale agent tme T.a n d SU f- n�A n.P i c a nom___ wills this assessment. Y, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding 5 Pit PROJECT IMPACTS AND 1'• _ MAGNITUDE Responsibi:11y of Lead Agency , General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and)or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 2 3 Small to fLarge ential Can Impact Be Moderate Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact pact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? — ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more El ❑ Dyes ONO than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No El I-] Dyes ❑No • Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect V. ..,y u;:.que or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO OYES • Specific land forms: ❑ El ❑Yes ❑Nr 6 3. Will proposed action affect any ON WATER 1 (Under Articles 15, 2 water bodySmall.tp 2 3 4, 25 of the EnvironmentaldConservat on Moderate Potential protected? Large Can Impact Be Examples that would a Law, ECL) Impact Impact Mitigated By • Developable area of site to column 2 ONO ❑YES Project Change • Dredgingcontains a protected water body. more than 100 cubic yards of Protected stream, ❑ material from channel of a ❑ • Extension of utility distribution facilities thro ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal ❑ ❑Yes • Other ugh a Protected water body. ❑No impacts: wetland. Y ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑NO 4. Will proposed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO of water? action affect any non- EJ Yes Exam Protected existingONO Examples that would °f new body • A 10% increase or decrease totcolumn he 2e area of anyONO DYES Or More than a 10 acre increase • Construction of or decrease. body °f water ❑ • Other Construction a body Of water that exceeds Cl Pacts: 10 acres of surface area. ❑Yes ❑No 5 Will Proposed ❑ Q ❑Yes ONO quality or Action affect surfs Examplesquantityr :ace or groundwater Yes ONO • Pro that would apply to column 2 DYES Proposed gc11On ONO will require a discharge permit. • Proposed Action re res have approval to serve tp ousedf a source of water that ❑ PropAction re (Project) action. does not ❑ gallons per minute requires wabtecrasupPly from r ❑ ❑Yes ❑N ❑ ° • Construction orPumpin . m wells with greater than 45 ❑Yes ❑No Parity, ❑ supply system. operation czusing any contamination of a ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will adverse v water ❑ • Liquid effluent will be I affect ❑ do not exist or have inadequate groundwater. ❑Yes ❑No made the site to facilities which presently ❑ • Proposed Action quare capacity. ❑ day, Would use water ❑ ❑ ayes ONO m excess Of 20000 Oyes• Proposed Ballo ONO Action will likely ns Per ❑ existing bodyaof - ..conditions. thattheo with other discharge into an ❑ EJ Yes contrast to disc ❑No rt • Proposed,:?tctio ns, an obvious visual ❑ ❑ Products nth�ll require the storage O( ❑Yes greater ONO Proposed n 1'100 gallons. Petroleum or the and/or se eftion will allow mica) ❑ residential uses in areas without water ❑ services ❑Yes Proposed Action to ON. require new rates commercial and ❑ ❑ facilities. or expansion of existing /or industrial uses ❑Yes b waste treat which may ❑NO Other impacts: treatment and/or s[ora$e ❑ (] ❑Yes ONO Will proposed action alter drains ❑ water runoff? ❑ C'Yes Exam drainage flow or patterns, ONO Examples that would a or surface roposed Action would PPIY to column 2 ONO DYES change flood water flows. 7 ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS J. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered �. species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ' Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 rhe proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 2 Small 3 to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Impact Mitigated By • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil p Impact Project Change agricultural land- profile of • The Proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ayes ONO than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more ❑ ❑ ayes ONO • The proposed actiogwould disrupt or Prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, ❑ strtP cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm ❑ ayes ONO field to drain Poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 1l . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617,21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or or Project components obviously different from n- sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether ❑ man-made or natural. ❑ ayes ONO • Proposed land uses aesthetic , or project resources whiccomponents visible to users of h will eliminate or significantly reduce their ❑ enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Project components that will result in the screening of scenic views known to be important tootheoarea.nificant ❑ . • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, historic or paleontological importance? Examples that would a YES • Proposed Action Occurring to column 2 ONO OYES contiguous to any facility r sitelisted or on tholly within Nationsubstantially l to tally of historic places. ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO • Any impact to an archaeological Register project site. site or fossil bed located within the • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ayes ONO archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ayes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality future open spaces or recreational opportunities) of existing or Examples that would apply to column ) The Permanent foreclosure of a future recreational o ONO OYES • A major reduction of an opens opportunity. • Other ac impacts: P e important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ayes ONO ❑ ❑ ayes ONO ❑Yes ONO 9 7 . 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation syst ms? Moderate Large Mitigated By NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 _.Iteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sourcgg's of fuel or energy supply? LgNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy Cl ❑ Dyes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibratio as a result of the Proposed Action? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO facility. • rrs will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO noise screen. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? f�r/ NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a.chronic low level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑NO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous Ot..... impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER y 2 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential 3 f18 will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Examples that would apply to column 2 EINO OYES Impact Impact Project Change • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. El ❑ • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services Dyes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. ❑ ❑ • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. El Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ El ❑No 13 • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures Elor areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ Dyes ❑No El Dyes ❑No • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ❑ ❑ • Proposed Action will set an important Yes ❑No • precedent for future projects. ❑ Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. El ❑No ❑ Dyes ❑No ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 19 Is there, or is there likely to b Potential adverse environmental impact�s?c controversy related to ONO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Part 3 Responsibility of Lead Agency must he prepared if one or more impacts) is considered to be potential) mitigated. Instructions Potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly describe the impact. 2. Dg5cribe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact b 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this irn To answer the Y project change(s). question of importance, consider: pact is important. • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently los[ resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 .• ... .. 14.14-111?97,-9c • 617.21 \ Appendix B SEQR Mate Environmental Quality Review C Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question ] 1 of Part 2 of the Full GAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Visibility Distance Between I. Would the project be visible from: Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-'/a /a-'/z /z-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places? El ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ • State Parks? • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ El El • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? El ❑ ❑ ❑ 11• National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? El ❑ ❑ • National Park Service lands? • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ El ❑ ❑ or Recreational? El 11 ❑ Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak?as ❑ El ❑ ❑ • A governmentally established or designated interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for ❑ ❑ ED ❑ ❑ establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ scenic? El El ❑ El r Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El El El ❑ • Local road? Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) El Yes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes E]No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMEN'. : 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *1/4 mile * I mile Essentially undeveloped a Cl Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond El Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat El Hilly EJ F-1 Mountainous Other NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: 11/2 mile Dyes ❑No *1 miles ❑Yes ❑No *2 miles ❑Yes ❑No *3 miles Dyes ❑No • Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work 0 ❑ Involved in recreational activities . 0 E Routine travel by residents El El El 0 At a residence El El 0 El At worksite 0 E] ❑ Other El ❑ ❑ 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS f .r ! SCOTT L. HARRIS � Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman `" George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor � `�'. "'":� .. c r Richard G. WardO Mark i' �� V Town Hall, 53095 Main Road McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kennethh L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF POVTHOLD ebruary 25, 1992 Fax (516) 765-1823 Michelle L. Klima Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 E. Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision of Charles Lewis SCTM#1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Ms. Klima: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 24, 1992. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, zwve Al ti Bennett Orlowski, J S Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals c PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS w Bennett Orlowski, Jr., ChairmanO i .1a� J SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward ��-� ia� ?s��j11� Mark S. McDonald ���r««� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 John Wagner February 26, 1992 Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision for Charles H. Lewis SCTM# 1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Wagner: The Planning Board has reviewed the maps dated October 30, 1991 for the above mentioned subdivision. Neither lot conforms to all of the requirements of the Bulk Schedule for the Zoning District. Therefore, variances for these R-40 lots wil required before the Planning Board can proceed with the be sketch determination. In addition, access to the lots is over land other than that owned by the subdivider. Therefore, you will need to obtain 280-A access approval. The Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on February 24, 1992. You will receive a copy of that resolution under separate cover. Please contact this office if you have any questions .""regarding the above. Very truly your, &� �2�" Bennett Orlowski, Jrl Chairman CC: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL /"!v COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. BOX 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. NEFTER (516) 369-1700 STEPHEN R. ANGEL WATER MILL OFFICE _ TELECOPIER NUMBER(516) 369-2065 MONTAUK 1'11GHWAY JANE ANN R. KRATZ P. O. BOX 570 JOHN M. WAGNER WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY (516) 726-6633 THOMAS F. WHELAN February 12, 1992 Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Chairperson Re: Minor Subdivision of Charles Lewis SCTM #1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Mr, Orlowski : Enclosed please find 12 prints of the amended map per Your request in your October 10, 1991 letter to me. I believe you will be able to proceed with the sketch Plan determination. Very truly yours, Michelle L. Klima, Paralegal Enclosures cc: Mr. Charles Lewis 0ons FEB 13 W2f t TNOLD TOVVIv NNING BOARD PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS i cm - � Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS George Ritchie Latham, Jr. `�_,. � �_ gip ,: Supervisor Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald rq ,,a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Michelle L. Klima 0(;tober 10, 1991 Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision for Charles H. Lewis SCTM# 1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Ms. Klima: The Planning Board has reviewed the maps submitted on October 3 , 1991, for the above mentioned subdivision. The following revisions/clarifications are required: 1 • Lot numbers must be indicated on each lot. 2. It is the Planning Board' s understanding that not all structures indicated on the map exist. It must be indicated on the map which buildings are habitable, and are to remain, and which structures are inhabitable and are to be removed. In addition, it should be noted that only one dwelling unit per lot is allowed. 3 . The 50 ' front yard setback for Lot 2 is not shown for the entire front yard. The area adjacent to the land now or formerly Mesdalgna Kudirka is also the front yard. Therefore, this area should have a 50 ' setback rather than a 20 ' setback. 4. Access to Lot 1 is to be via the 25' wide r-o-w to Lighthouse Road. Lot 1 shall not have access via the 30 ' wide r-o-w. This should be so indicated on the map. Page 2 Charles Lewis 5 . Access to the lots is over land other than that owned by the subdivider. Therefore, you must apply to the Zoning Board of appeals for 280-A access approval. 280-A approval will be required prior to the Planning Board granting any final approval to this subdivision. Upon receipt of maps revised as mentioned above, this application will be scheduled for a sketch determination, and the State Environmental Quality Review process will be initiated. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlwoski, Jr. s Chairman ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET '/q/�fs P. O. BOX 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS MARCIA Z. HEFTER (516) 369-1700 _ WATER MILL OFFICE STEPHEN R. ANGEL TELECOPIER NUMBER (516) 369-2065 MONTAUK HIGHWAY JANE ANN R. KRATz P. O. BOX 570 JOHN M. WAGNER WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 WILLIAM POWER MALONEY (516) 726-6633 THOMAS F. WHELAN October 2, 1991 HAND DELIVERED Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 rlr..c N µeq Attn: Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman of Planning Board Re: Minor Subdivision for Charles H. Lewis SCTM#1000-50-03-14, 15 & 16 Dear Mr. Orlowski : Per your letter of May 16, 1991 as to the Planning Board' s request for a revised survey for the captioned subdivision, I enclose herein 12 prints of same. As well, I enclose the LEAF, which was prepared by Mr. Metzger of Peconic Surveyors, and a check in the amount of $400 .00 as payment for environmental consultant fees in connection with the LEAF. I believe that you now have all the information you will need to proceed with your review of this application. If that is not the case, please contact the undersigned. Thank you. Very truly yours, Michelle L. Klima, Paralegal Enclosures PtAMP11 IG BO RD i4•g6-2 (2187)-7c • IR� 817.21 p LC M n Appendix A S OR State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT F 4-+ Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an. WIWI or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determ ne significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. • Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to eval impact is actually important. uate whether or not the DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions FdentiFyy the Portions of EAF completed for this project: .4 Part 1 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),❑ Part 2 ❑part 3 information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the and any other supporting lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared, ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Land Division of Charles H. Lewis Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 O PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor N�(�k; Thrc is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe 00^'[[�6e environmen se complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considere or approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition. inf be ill be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expectert at comp etion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involy new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specii each instance. NAME OF ACTION Land Division of Charles H. Lewis _ LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) North of Sound View Avenue , West of Lighthouse Rd . , at Southold , NY NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Esseks Hefter & Angel Attn : Stephen R. Angel , Esq . (516) 369-1700 ADDRESS 108 E. Main St . , Box 279 , CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE NY 11901 Riverhead NAME OF OWNER(It difterent) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Charles H. Lewis I 1 - . ADDRESS e 710 CITYIPO — STATE ZIP CODE XXXXX N8N1W7 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION ' Minor Subdivision into two lots . of land which presently consists of three lots . Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. �( 1. Present land use: 50Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-fa ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other - - y 2. Total acreage of project area: 2 G!� acres. APPROXIMATE ACREPIGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETIOP Meadow or Orushland (Non-agricultural) O.5 acres O 5 acre- Forested / acres j acre Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acre Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) O ✓ acres 0, / acre Water Surface Area acres acre Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acre Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acre Other (Indicate type) 6A` ^ O• acres tom• C' acre �( 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? l` a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained % of site ❑Moderately well drained iso % of site ❑Poorly drained 20 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the i Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 377/0). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes f�tvo a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5: 'Approximate percentage of proposedp•ct site with slopes: L50-10/o o o, y �• o --- :7 LJ1 10-15% S 015% or greater . % Is Project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes ONO X� '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes 8. What is the depth of the water table? �S ` (in feet) �NO 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes XNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes (!I/No / 11. Does project site �c/oPtain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes o According to Identify each species iIX12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes Ui(qo Describe 13. Is the project site pfesently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes INNO If yes, explain _ 1/14. Does the present si include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes o 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: \ , a. Name X served by existing b• Size (In acres) 17. Is the site g public utilities? Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? � b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes ❑NLhNo \ , 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, /X Section 303 and 304? Dyes EJ�Qo `19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous o a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 /•( of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes IGNo B. Project Description X1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: 0 acres. acres c. Project acreage to remain undevelopedinitially; _ C7_ acres ultimately. d. Length of project, in miles:P lett is an expansion, acres. e. If the pr P (If appropriate) indicate percent of expansion proposed %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing -- g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour PfOP°sed h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: (upon completion of project)? One Family L Two FamilyInitially / Multiplele Family Condominium Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest 6 proposed structure hei ht �— j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project height; r width; p ft length. PY is. 3 X 2. How much natural ma,-rial (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removeo from the site? N� tonslcubi� yards, 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? OYes ONo PN/A a. If yes, for what intender purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Oyes ONo X4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. X 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes MNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N`N a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Ye{sl ,INo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction "' after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Wil�pJo(ect require relocation of any projects or facilities? OYes ONo If yes, explain 12. Is a surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes ONo Type -- 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? OYes JZNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? OYes ONo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? OYes 01No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? OYes ONo c. If yes, give name ; location - -- d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes ONo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes INo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes PNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes YIN 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? OYes J25No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? OYes )dNo If yes , indicate type(s) - X22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 4-�C�2— gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes f3No If Yes, explain 4 -25. Approvals Required: • Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes [allo City, Town, Village Planning Board OYes ❑NoGrp J ' City, Town Zoning Board t Y� Si [lr� Dyes f�No City, County Health Department Efies ❑No Other Local Agencies ❑Yes fr1No ( Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes IZNo State Agencies ❑Yes Cd"No Federal Agencies ❑Yes 0"No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? N//Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit usubdivision ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other ❑site plan 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? LIZ) 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? SVyL\ 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? f 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a y, mile radius of proposed action? —IR01, 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Y. mile? IYeT ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed?-`t I: C-) a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? +\ ADC) 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes ,�,/� 11 . Will the proposed action create demand for any communitycKo fire protection)? ❑Yes provided services (recreation, education, Police, a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes —/ a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑No h3No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. if there are impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you oProp se tomitigateor avoid them. Y adverse E. Verification Icertify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Na e John T.T. ---Me = L,. S. Signature Date 10/2/91 -- � Title Land Sy1r-V-f-�Y-QX fDr A an If the action is to the Coastal Are nd you are a state agency, Complete the Coastal Assessment For with this assessment. m before proceeding 5 Pt 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND 1 . IR MAGNITUDE Responsibi:ity of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential :Can Impact Be Moderate Large tigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact ect Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 El El Yes ❑No • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ El ❑Yes El No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ El ❑Yes ONO than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 El 171 ❑Yes ONO tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO El El ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t.-- ...,y un,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO DYES El Cl ❑Yes ❑No • Specific land forms: 6 3 Will proposed actio IMPACT ON WATER (Under n affect an SMall,to 2 3 Articles 15,24 Y water body designated as Potential Can Impact 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Moderate Protected? Large ' Pact Be Examples that Impact ImpactMitigated By • Developablewould apply to column 2 Pro' area of site contains a ANO ❑yESJect Change • Dredging more than 100 cubic Protected water body. Protected stream. Yards of material from ❑ • Extension of utilityrT� channel of a ❑ ❑Yes ❑No distribution facilities through a Protected ❑ ❑ • Construction in a designated ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: freshwater or d water body, pacts: tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will Proposed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON. of waterP action affect any non- ❑Yes ❑No Examples that would apply Protected existing or new bod • A 10% increase or Ppl n column 2 y decrease in the surface area ONO ❑YES or more than a 10 acre increase or • Construction of a body decrease, of any body of water • Other impacts: V of water that exceeds 10 acres ❑ ❑ Pacts' of surface area. ❑Yes ONO S. Will Pro ❑ O ❑Yes ❑No Proposed Action affect surface Quality or quantity? or groundwater ❑Yes ❑No Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will re ONO AYES • Proposed quire a discharge permit. lave approval Action re reusequires of • Proposed Action requires Serve P opo ed (project) actionwater that does not Source of ❑ ❑ n requires water su ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute Pumping PPIY from wells with ❑Yes ❑No • Construction orcapacity. Greater than qs supply system, operation causing any contamination of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will adverse y water ❑ • Liquid effluent will be conve.� affect r. ❑ do not )rd off the site to facilities which ED Yes ❑No exist ti have inadequate capacity. ❑ • Proposed ,action would use Presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes day. water in excess ❑ ❑NO Of 20,000 ❑Yes ❑No Proposed Action will likely gallons per ❑ existing body of w • Y cause siltatio ❑ contrast to a`Qf to the exte't that n °r other dischar ❑Yes ❑No natural conditions there will be an obvious visuan al ❑ Proucts posed Action will require the storage ❑ ❑Yes greater ❑No than 1 100 ge of petroleum or the Proposed Action gallons. chemical ❑ and/or sewer will allow tesidential uses ❑ services. in areas Dyes'roposed without water ❑No Action locates commercial and o ❑ equire new or expansion of ❑ Icilities. and/or industrial uses ❑Yes ❑No existing waste which may ether impacts: treatment and/or storage ❑ ❑ ED Yes ❑No Vdl Proposed action alter drainage ❑ ❑ ater runoff? ge flow or ❑Yes ❑No -amPles that Patterns, or surface 'Posed would apply to column 2 Action would chap ANO OYES change flood water flows 7 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate 'Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS d_ Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO ' of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 __ The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural El ❑Yes ONO land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be C Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. ❑ ED ❑No ction • The of agriculturalal land or, fdlocatedsin anonvert Agricultutalore [han Districtamoe than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • The Proposed action.would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, ❑ ❑ strip cropping); or create a need for such measures e. Oyes ❑No field to drain Poorly due to increased runoff) ( g cause a farm • Other impacts: ❑ 0 ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix a.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • or inosed sharpland contrast to current surrounding components land use pattterns, whether ifferent from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO man-made or natural • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their ❑ ❑ enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. ❑Yes ONO • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. ❑ Oyes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ 0 Oyes ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 ANO OYES • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially 0 contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register ❑ of historic places. ❑Yes ONO Any impact to an n the archaeological site or fossil bed located within project site. 0 ❑ • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑Yes ONO archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. 0 ❑ • Other impacts: ❑Yes ONO 0 0 Oyes ONO IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 • The Permanent foreclosure of a future recreational Opportunity. OYES • A major reduction of an open PPortunity. � � • Other impacts; p space important to the community. ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ 0 es ❑No 0 ❑Yes ONO 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation cyst ms? Moderate Large Mitigated By ¢7NO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 _.Iteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sou rcgg's of fuel or energy supply/ x0 DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5%u increase in the use of ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 1G. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibratVN as a result of the Proposed Action? O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO facility. )rs will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious. etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous / w: l Ot•... impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO 10 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 1 2 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential' Can Impact Be 18. Will proposed action affect�. the character of the existing community? Moderate Large 9 Mitigated By Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO OYES Impact Impact Project Change • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. ❑ El Dyes ONO • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. 11 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • ❑Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ Dyes ONO or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ Dyes ONO • Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) ❑ El Dyes ONO • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO ❑ ❑ El Yes ONO 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to Potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. P To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its Potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact, (Continue on attachments) 11 14.14.11 (:.97)-9c 617.21 SEAR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review C Visual EAS' Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-1/4 /4-'/z 1/2-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMEN'. T 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *'/a mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *1/2 mile []Yes ❑No *1 miles ❑Yes El No *2 miles ❑Yes El No *3 miles []Yes El No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 + �UrF17l,�r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Benne[[ Orlowski, Jr., Chairmanyf Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. '"'�q� -•y ���,,.,.' Richard G. Ward '= Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 16, 1991 Michelle L. Klima Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Minor Subdivision for Charles H. Lewis SCTM# 1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Dear Ms. Klima: The Planning Board has reviewed the enclosed report which was adopted by the Board of Trustees on May 2, 1991. The Planning Board requests that the map be revised as follows: 1. The upland area and the wetland area for Lot 1 must be indicated on the map. The upland portion of each lot must be 40, 000 square feet in area. 2 . A seventy-five (75) foot buffer area must be shown adjacent to the wetland area. This buffer area is to be left in a natural state and is not to be disturbed. 3 . The access proposed for Lot 1 is not acceptable. The lot lines for the two lots should be changed so that access to Lot 1 is outside the seventy-five (75) foot buffer area. 4. Both lots must conform to the width and depth requirements for the R-40 Zoning District. 5 . Building envelopes must be shown for both lots. 6 . The map scale must be changed to 1" equals 1001 . In addition, the following items are required: In addition, the following items are required: A. A Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) . A Short Environmental Assessment Form was submitted with the application. However, the Planning Board requires a LEAF for all subdivisions. B. The Planning Board will be referring the LEAF to their Environmental Consultant for review. There will be a $400. 00 fee for this review. Payment should be submitted with the LEAF. Upon submission of the above mentioned items and revised maps, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, J Chairman enc. ,ZFFC1 s TRUSTEES John M.Bredemeyer,III,President SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith,Vice President w E T SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski,Jr. `, r John L. Bednoski,Jr. ' �� n� ; 3 �5 , Town Hall John B.Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Planning Board ����nnnn FROM: Board of Trusteesp. jr c;- RE: Subdivision of Charles Lewis SCTM 41000-50-3-14,15 , 16 DATE: May 9, 1991 The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on Thursday, May 2, 1991: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees accepts and forwards the April 17, 1991 report of Consultant Bruce Anderson to the Planning Board. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. JMB: jmt enc. cc: CAC FFOIA-c0 ,a/3 TRUSTEES SUPERVISOR John M.Bredemeyer,III,President : SCOTT L.HARRIS Henry P. Smith,Vice President Albert J.Kmpski,Jr. John L. Bednoski,Jr. y'�Ql �a�! Town Hall John B.Tuthill # 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Planning Board FROM: Board of Trusteesc RE: Subdivision of Cha les Lewis SCTM #1000-50-3-14 ,15,16 DATE: May 9, 1991 The following action was taken by the Southold Town Board of Trustees on Thursday, May 2, 1991: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Trustees accepts and forwards the April 17, 1991 report of Consultant Bruce Anderson to the Planning Board. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. JMB: jmt enc. CC: CAC 9 iJ91 Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant 6 To : John Bredemeyer , President D Southold Board of Trustees -" From: Bruce Anderson T W� OF SOUTHOLD Environmental Consultant Date: April 17 , 1991 Re: Environmental Review - Subdivision Charles Lewis Situate n/o Sound View Ave 1 W/o Lighthouse Road SCTM # 1000-50-3-14 , 15 , 16 Subject parcel contains 2 . 2612 acres and is located in an R-40 zoning district. The applicant proposes to subdivide the parcel into two lots . On the survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors dated November 20 , 1989 , proposed lot #1 contains 1. 2005 acres . Proposed lot #2 contains 1 . 0607 acres . Proposed lot #1 contains wetlands . Lot #2 is comprised entirely of upland vegetative communities . The wetland found on proposed lot #1 is generally characterized as a buttonbush - swamp loosestrife wetland. The size and shape of the wetlands found on site appear to accurately reflect the existing wetlands . The wetland system is actually split by the previous construction of the gravel unimproved road used to access the site. Wetlands are similar in nature west of the gravel road but appear to be much larger than those found on subject parcel. Wetlands on subject parcel were flagged during the field inspection of April 14 , 1991 . Soils underlying the wetland are quite mucky and the wetland is regarded as having been formed as a result of the soils . Perched above the water table , this wetland collects standing water as a result of overland runoff . The standing water , present during the time of field inspections may disappear during periods of extended drought. However , it appears that standing water has sustained itself for most if not all of this year as evidenced by the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation. The uplands are generally wooded and contain two dilapidated buildings , eight sheds also in dilapidated condition and the remains of an old foundation . In and around these structures , the land has been most recently disturbed . The woodlands are characterized as early successional . The presence of mature black locust which 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 dominate the woodlands area are typically considered indicators of disturbed lands . However , a rather lush shrub understory has become established throughout the upland/woodland areas . The following species were identified within the wetlands area: Buttonbush Cep'nalanthus occidentalis Swamp loosestrife Decodon vertillatus Common greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia Cat brier Smilax glauca Black tupelo Nyssa sylvatica Water milfoil Myrophyllum spp. Slender spikerush Eleocharis spp. Highbush blueberry Vaccinium corymbossum Dead decaying trees The following species were observed in the uplands portion of the site : Black locust Robinia psuedo-acacia White oak Quercus alba Grey birch Betula populifolia Flowering dogwood Cornus florida Pignut hickory Carya glabra Red cedar Juniperus virginiana White Cedar Thuja occidentalis Red raspberry Rhubus idaeus Black raspberry Rhubus occidentalis Blackberry Rhubus allegheniensis Common elderberry Sambucus canadensis Scotch broom Cystis scoparius Green brier Smilax rotundifolia Cat brier Smilax glauca Cross vine Bignonia capreolata Virginia creeper Parthenocissus quinquifoiia Poison ivy Rhus radicans Recommendations : 1- The wetlands as shown on the survey prepared by Peconic Associates appears to adequately portray the size and shape of the existing wetlands on site. These wetlands have been flagged. The Trustees may wish to have the flagged wetland boundary placed upon the survey. However, it is unlikely that such a formal wetland delineation will have any effect upon the subdivision yield of the property. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 2- The existing transitional and upland habitats from the wetlands extend to the existing dwelling on proposed lot #1 . This distance scales to approximately 75 feet from the freshwater wetlands above which has been disturbed by clearing in and around subject dwellings . Given the existing setback from the wetlands , there appears to be more than sufficient roam further east for future housing construction . It would therefore seem logical and reasonable for any future dwelling to be located not closer than 75 feet to wetlands . It is recommended that a building envelop be located on the survey of the proposed subdivision reflecting a setback of at least 75 feet from the freshwater wetlands . 3- It is recommended that lands within 75 feet of the wetlands be retained in their natural condition. 4- The probable redevelopment of the dwelling on proposed lot r'l should be regulated as to prevent erosion into the natural areas within 75 feet of the wetlands . This preventative technique is usually accomplished by the use of haybales placed end to end and firmly staked into the ground . The Trustees may wish to make such a recommendation. COc- 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Bruce Anderson 14S Environmental Consultant To: John Bredemeyer , President v1 Southold Board of Trustees �! From: Bruce Anderson WN pF $pUTHOLD Environmental Consultant Date: April 17 , 1991 Re: Environmental Review - Subdivision Charles Lewis Situate n/o Sound View Ave w/o Lighthouse Road SCTM # 1000-50-3-14 , 15 , 16 Subject parcel contains 2 . 2612 acres and is located in an R-40 zoning district. The applicant proposes to subdivide the parcel into two lots . On the survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors dated November 20, 1989 , proposed lot #1 contains 1 . 2005 acres . Proposed lot #2 contains 1 .0607 acres . Proposed lot #1 contains wetlands . Lot #2 is comprised entirely of upland vegetative communities . The wetland found on proposed lot #1 is generally characterized as a buttonbush - swamp loosestrife wetland. The size and shape of the wetlands found on site appear to accurately reflect the existing wetlands . The wetland system is actually split by the previous construction of the gravel unimproved road used to access the site . Wetlands are similar in nature west of the gravel road but appear to be much larger than those found on subject parcel. Wetlands on subject parcel were flagged during the field inspection of April 14 , 1991 . Soils underlying the wetland are quite mucky and the wetland is regarded as having been formed as a result of the soils . Perched above the water table , this wetland collects standing water as a result of overland runoff . The standing water , present during the time of field inspections may disappear during periods of extended drought. However , it appears that standing water has sustained itself for most if not all of this year as evidenced by the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation. The uplands are generally wooded and contain two dilapidated buildings , eight sheds also in dilapidated condition and the remains of an old foundation. In and around these structures , the land has been most recently disturbed. The woodlands are characterized as early successional . The presence of mature black locust which APR 2 4 1991 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 dominate the woodlands area are typically considered indicators of disturbed lands . However , a rather lush shrub understory has become established throughout the upland/woodland areas . The following species were identified within the wetlands area: Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis Swamp loosestrife Decodon vertillatus Common greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia Cat brier Smilax glauca Black tupelo Nyssa sylvatica Water milfoil Myrophyllum spp. Slender spikerush Eleocharis spp. Highbush blueberry Vaccinium corymbossum Dead decaying trees The following species were observed in the uplands portion of the site: Black locust Robinia psuedo-acacia White oak Quercus alba Grey birch Betula populifolia Flowering dogwood Cornus florida Pignut hickory Carya glabra Red cedar Juniperus virginiana White Cedar Thuja occidentalis Red raspberry Rhubus idaeus Black raspberry Rhubus occidentalis Blackberry Rhubus allegheniensis Common elderberry Sambucus canadensis Scotch broom Cystis scoparius Green brier Smilax rotundifolia Cat brier Smilax glauca Cross vine Bignonia capreolata Virginia creeper Parthenocissus quinquifolia Poison ivy Rhus radicans Recommendations : 1- The wetlands as shown on the survey prepared by Peconic Associates appears to adequately portray the size and shape of the existing wetlands on site. These wetlands have been flagged. The Trustees may wish to have the flagged wetland boundary placed upon the survey . However , it is unlikely that such a formal wetland delineation will have any effect upon the subdivision yield of the property . 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 2- The existing transitional and upland habitats from the wetlands extend to the existing dwelling on proposed lot #1 . This distance scales to approximately 75 feet from the freshwater wetlands above which has been disturbed by clearing in and around subject dwellings . Given the existing setback from the wetlands , there appears to be more than sufficient room further east for future housing construction . It would therefore seem logical and reasonable for any future dwelling to be located not closer than 75 feet to wetlands . It is recommended that a building envelop be located on the survey of the proposed subdivision reflecting a setback of at least 75 feet from the freshwater wetlands . 3- It is recommended that lands within 75 feet of the wetlands be retained in their natural condition . 4- The probable redevelopment of the dwelling on proposed lot #1 should be regulated as to prevent erosion into the natural areas within 75 feet of the wetlands . This preventative technique is usually accomplished by the use of haybales placed end to end and firmly staked into the ground . The Trustees may wish to make such a recommendation. CL'• 3' C (4c- 475 4c475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 =o�gUFF01,rcoGy C* TRUSTEES N 'Vi M. Bredemeyer, III, President � SCOTT L. HARRIS� '� Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President '>�Q� �.D�! Albert 1. Krupski, Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road John L. Bednoski, Jr. P.O. Boz 1179 John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold, New York 11971 Fax Telephone (516) 765-1892 765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephonene (5(516) 765-1800 April 4, 1991 Bruce Anderson 475 Rambler Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Charles Lewis SCTM #1000-50-3-14,15 & 16 Dear Mr. Anderson: Please note that this office has received the $140. 00 fee for Proposed consulting work. Please continue your review in this matter and submit same as soon as possible. Thank you. Sincerely, John M. Bredemeyer, Ii II President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmt CC: Planning Board APR - 5 1991 Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant To : John Bredeme er Southold Board ofTrustees �I resident From: Bruce Anderson Environmental Consultant �4 TMIM OFSOUTI LD Date: April 17 , 1991 Re: Environmental Review - Subdivision Charles Lewis Situate n/o Sound View Ave w/o Lighthouse Road SCTM # 1000-50-3-14, 15 , 16 Subject parcel contains 2 . 2612 acre; and is located in an R-40 zoning district. The applicant proposes to subdivide the parcel into two lots . On the survey prepared b1 Peconinsic S1rveyors dateres . d November 20 1989 , proposed lot acres . Proposed lot #1 contains wetlands . conLotain#2sis '0607 comprised entirely of upland vegetative communities . The wetland found on proposed lot ;11 is generally characterized as a buttonbush - swamp loosestrife wetland . The size and shape of the wetlands found se on accurately reflect the esite appear to xisting wetlands . The wetland System is actually split by the previous construction of the gravel unimproved road used to access the site . Wetlands are similar in nature west of the gravel road but appear to be much larger than those found on subject parcel . Wetlands on subject parcel were flagged during the field inspection of April 14 , 1991 . Soils underlying the wetland are quite mucky and the wetland is regarded as having been formed as a result of the soils . Perched above the water table , this wetland collects standing water as a result of overland runoff . The standing water, present during the time of field inspections may disappear during periods of extended drought . However , it appears that standing water has sustained itself for most if not all of this year as evidenced by the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation . The uplands are generally wooded and contain two dilapidated building ition and s , eight sheds also in dilapidated condthe remains of an old foundation. around these structures , the land has been most rIn and ecently disturbed . The woodlands are characterized as early successional . The presence of mature black locust which 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 dominate the woodlands area are typically considered indicators of disturbed lands . However , a rather lush shrub understory has become established throughout the upland/woodland areas . The following species were identified within the wetlands area: Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis Swamp loosestrife Decodon vertillatus Common greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia Cat brier Smilax glauca Black tupelo Nyssa sylvatica Water milfoil lyrophyllum spp. Slender spikerush Eleccharis spp. Highbush blueberry Vaccinium corymbossum Dead decaying trees The following species were observed in the uplands Portion of the site : Black locust Robinia psuedo-acacia White oak Quercus alba Grey birch Betula populifolia Flowering dogwood Cornus Florida Pignut hickory Cary a labra Red cedar g White Cedar Juniperusocc occidentalis Red raspberry Thuja occidentalis Black raspberry Rhubus idaeus Rhubus occidentalis Blackberry Rhubus allegheniensis Common elderberry Sambucus canadensis Green brier Cystis scoparius Cat brier Smilax rotundifolia Cross vine Smilax glauca Bignonia capreolata Virginia creeperParthenocissus quinquifolia Poison ivy Rhus radicans Recommendations : 1 - The wetlands as shown on the survey prepared by Peconic Associates appears to adequately portray the size and shape of the existing wetlands on site. have been flagged. The Trustees may wish to have the These wetlands flagged wetland boundary placed upon the survey. it is unlikely that such a formal wetlaHowever, nd have any effect upon the subdivision yidelineation will eld deell the property. 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 V z- The existing transitional and upland habitats from #le wetlands distanceextend scalesetoxapproximatelyn75ofeetofrromdthlo et freshwater wetlands above which has been disturbed by clearing in and around subject dwellings . Given the existing setback from the wetlands , there appears he be more than sufficient room further east for future housing construction. It would therefore seem logical and reasonable for any future dwelling to be located not closer than 75 feet to wetlands . It is recommended that a building envelop be located on the survey of the proposed subdivision reflecting a setback of at least 75 feet from the freshwater wetlands . 3- It is recommended that lands within 75 feet of the wetlands be retained in their natural condition . 4- The probable redevelopment of the dwelling on proposed lot #1 should be regulated as to prevent erosion into the natural areas within 75 feet of the wetlands . This Preventative technique is usually accomplished by the use of haybales placed end to end and firmly staked into the ground . The Trustees may wish to make such a recommendation. CSL � 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 Fp(,f-`D �5 Telephone cn Town Hall. 53095 Main Road (516) 765-1801 O • P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Trustees From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Dated: Decmeber 18, 1990 Re: Planning Board Subdivison of Charles H. SCTM #1000-50-3-14, 15 and 16 Lewis The Conservation Advisory Council made an inspection of the above referenced site. Wetlands are located in the n/w corner of the property. The Council suggests aerial photos be used to determine whether some wetlands are involved but unlocated during inspection due to heavy vegetation growth. cc: Planning Board 0 OG TRUSTEES r�i� s Z SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III, President O ` .F Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. own� THall, 53095 Main Roa John L. Bednoski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 November 19 , 1990 Stephen Angel Esseks, Hefter & Angel 108 East Main Street P.O. Box 279 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Consulting Fees for Charles Lewis SCTM #1000-50-3-14,15 & 16 Dear Mr. Angel: Enclosed please find a memo from Bruce Anderson, consultant to the Southold Town Board of Trustees in regard to his fees. The fee of $140. 00 must be submitted to this office prior to any further action on this application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Vepy truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees �19V 2 0 " JMB: jmt CC: Planning Board I l Druce Anderson Environmental Consultant IL --1November 14 1990 John Bredemeyer, President Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall P . 0. Box 1179 Southold , NY 11971 Re : Estimate of Environmental Services Minor Subdivision - Lewis SCTM# 100-50-3-14, 15 , 16 Total expense for environmental services in conection with the above referenced project is estimated at $140.00. This includes field inspection, natural resources inventory covering existing flora and flagging of the wetlands boundary . Sincerely, Bruce Anderson 475 Rambler Road, Southold, NY 11971 (516) 765-4071 i 0 ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL Sue)FIC COUNSELORS AT LAW "nS b0z I 106 EAST MAIN STREET p[,� P. O. BOX 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (516) 369-1700 MARCIA Z. HEFTER WATER MILL OFFICE STEPHEN R. ANGEL TetEx-EHCA 6852318 UW MONTAUK HIGHWAY TELECOPIER NUMBER(516) 369-2065 P. O. BOX 570 JANE ANN R. KRATZ WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 JOHN M. WAGNER WILLIAM POWER MALONEY (516) 7265633_ THOMAS F.WHELAN ALAN D. OSHRIN OF COUNSEL October 26, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Main Street Southold, New York 11971 Re: Land Division of Charles H. Lewis S .C.T.M. #1000-50-03-14 , 15 & 16 Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed please find the approved map for the above application, which we received from the Suffolk County Department of Health. The Health Department has determined this application to be exempt under Article VI , Section 609.2 (d) of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. Please retain this in your files . Very truly yours, Michelle L . Klima, Paralegal Enclosure cc: Mr . Charles H. Lewis W79 Suc�Fr�� ESSEKS, HEFTER & ANGEL COUNSELORS AT LAW 108 EAST MAIN STREET P. O. Box 279 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 WILLIAM W. ESSEKS (516) 369-1700 WATER MILL OFFICE MARCIA Z. HEFTER MONTAUK HIGHWAY STEPHEN R.ANGEL TELEx-EHCA 6852318 UW P. 0. BOX 570 TELECOPIER NUMBER (516) 369-2065 WATER MILL, N.Y. 11976 JANE ANN R. KRATZ (516) 726-6633 JOHN M. WAGNER WILLIAM POWER MALONEY ALAN D. OSHRIN THOMAS F.WHELAN October 9 , 1990 OF COUNSEL Southold Town Planning Board Suffolk Cty. Dept. of Health Southold Town Hall Bureau of Wastewater Mgmt. Main Road Riverhead County Center Southold , New York 11971 Riverhead, New York 11901 Re: Land Division of Charles H. Lewis S.C.T.M. #1000-50-03-14 , 15 & 16 Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed please find a copy of the signed authorization by our client, Charles Lewis , authorizing our firm to act as the attorney/agents on the captioned minor subdivision. Please retain it in your files. Thank you. Very truly yours, �J J I Stephen R. Angel SRA/mlk Enclosure AUTHORIZATION I hereby authorize the firm of Esseks , Hefter & Angel to act as my Attorney/Agent with regard to my minor subdivision application before the Southold Town Planning Board, and any other applicable agencies , which may review this application. AJC �V Lrz�L- DATE CHARLES H. LEWIS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ^ SCOTT L. HARRIS u� 1'„ r Supervisor Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman :+�'' �►" George Ritchie Latham, Jr. :,'9� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: John Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. sjp•�/*� Chairman DATE: October 18, 1990 RE: Minor Subdivision for Charles H. Lewis SCTM# 1000-50-3-14, 15 & 16 Enclosed please find a map dated November 20, 1989 for the above mentioned subdivision. Please review the delineation of the wetland line and advise if there are any other wetlands located on the property. This is a new application before the Planning Board. No approvals of any kind have been granted by the Board. Thank you in advance for your assistance. enc. cc: John Holzapfel, Conservation Advisory Committee Stephen R. Angel, Attorney for applicant e se p B k I SOUNO 15Lp NO LONO 2 F ,i4r1' a O �r k�SDUTIgLD NIRN DIST Yysl t � 9 J r� m © COUNTY OF SUFFOL 50 OLD x...,„.,r.-.,��•.. „, -w--r—�—� Re PerIY Tax $er c n �r - ss < c - PROPE0.lY MAP H { • r t - 7 \ i hhjjtfi , y: -,,` 9: ` 4 J -• �yy/• 1 i• Yet All •F�f N. r/ <y . .l' °S� v! - x � syr- �J�y i ✓i .r . -..{f \ ♦ r'�l Sr���`.,,Ji\ � � ���. . 'p' rs" r'S�� � - - ♦ •'. �f'",\ I�•, �, ,:gi9w� �u5 ,yam, .,ytyt, :! 3yyc � _ t u+•X 1�V �q� � . re M w, =' ;.r� �f�. ;, 1..,✓ AA -� I Afj 1p leeears �;W�/•i i�r �r�Y r .r+ j�TY d(+� � .. ,f,{,��-fit ' . vell +� � /,� +��'��t'�'as $�� /` y� - � •S./, "` — , '� t 6; � a$.1, a. .� 1 1`. '• t_• �. xt .� -"¢r+V. ., + - � 1. r• t A. � �t C t ��__�Y. �' i G � J. fl,t. J pf 2 SOU10 - :1 ,SLANQ xF,, - ONB. o, N/O/F N/O/F EDNA TERRY HARNAN VIRGINIABENNETT MOORE MOSS 1 ry � Y I 11 VMGINA BENNETT MOORE MOSS SOUTHOLD ' o PARK \ r ?31.85' .w Ir W aM N I4' b8' O7" E W 127.76' a a DISTRICT 'P 104.08' g 00 + ° do KEY MAP h g 30 WIDE R O W m " ° SCALE 1 600' I I J� e O o .It to 4 \ FIN. GRADE �K F _ L 0 T - Q Z PROPERTY LINE Q W � \ 02 DAL. FINISHED iflABE U TlE'i 2 J TANNABE T I'MIM. I'MIN. 1 Ir 1\( O i i Q' 2�MPIf u e'MAN WELL w � w ( W qtr , 1 �lveY a AREA = 1. 05 acres L O ,°Pvc. T= Ti cc N FWD 2 z B �T ,"pv° \'� . ,"CABIN, ' o a' 04. .800 eQ Far Pr Z _ w - '' sib e WA L AWG" t >x I 30' DRDbNO WATER N �T * ' kil W Ef ' I ' v°o OAt. PTIbTANN�Q \� sUBMER9I BLE & Y "" LEAW41 zf MIM 1 ._ IY ..� V O PUMP eO_P.M. 2'MIN� R J 4"y Dp8NH0 WgT�fl PDDR fIAIN., } 1 S. 48' 00' 00" W. 31167' FMD ' \ TYPICAL WELL TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM' TYAPLOT PLAIN S' Rtli N. 48' 00', 00" E. 3 _ e J THE .WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSALLOTS IN + o c, � COMPLYIES WITHOTHEL STANDARDSHIS 8 REQUIREMENTS LAND DIVISION ' VI SI O ' L_I W W OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPA�M ENT OF HEALTH. �I y T LU F y �— OR I for W 2 W 2 PMrd O E., 0 1 F _ 4 I � 'es. �' w '� Y EO LAND BG , CHARLES H. LEWIS ' ,, \ _ y I. Met Z �� �Oa9 A A T SOUTHOLD ` " ""° 'COMPLETED CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS MADE BY US FROM ACTUAL SURVEYS W o° �� .. �," '0^ o Q O COMPLETED °E'' ?* /9w9 AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHOWN THUS: 4 T O • W N OF SOU THOLI,De 4O �' a HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN F �O '^ ., f,�. q I 3 Z AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS 6RE CORRECT, Nj. Q'b w U yTFOF NE`I'I�O SUFFOLK COUNTY, NI Y. 1y B1'� AREA 1060 _ N T., MET GE . :S. LIC. NO. 49818 Z I — O $ 1000 - 50 03 - 14T acres 15 � 16 y 3 Scale 1" _ f3' Oc 1' 24, 19`� " ~ THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PL.'r HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE ¢ PLANNING BOARD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BY RESOLUTION OF '� APPROVAL DATED Nov. 20, 1989 (revise ) rise S MON :p N 4e' oo' oo' E 15828 FNO W 11a.00 s a' oo' oo ' FND D '1 I o BY DATE CHAIRMAN PLANNING BOARD 0.!'a q h I 25 WIDE R O W '!0 . - N", E.a4 O.L'E t0 O' e.r•W 170.00' S IT 54' 37" W .� o N/O/f N55'02'20" J88' Q BLDG. ZONE DISTRICT: �` R - 40 -- O FIRE DISTRICT: / 28 D _ N/O/F -- FIRE DI DISTRICT: 5 y� ' NUOLE K(/DBPKA I (,.YD ,E/ „ MESOALONA KUDBPKA R D w RONMENTAL HEALTHOWNER AND APPLICAINT; DELTH SERVICES, StMLK COUNTY"' - VIEW W AVE . N /0 /F 7Ho LESPERAN ELES H. ls HAUPPAUGEI N.Y. DCT_ 2 4 - SOU N D H E R I N GO TECUMSEH „ ONT N8NIW7 `�\ Prsparld M Mtwoh lcl PHM dH A&mw ,# standards for dfN surppwrp u nyWdos�Md - /I� _ _ .. rot s oh usi y Th Kew York State Lind "° v '-I Ir 1t; i' fl 11f1 „'I T1Ns Association. I''P S J 1 ';gll'' 'OCT 2 91490 OUND VSE �1 C PECONIC SURVEYORS , P. C . AVENUE � - 516 ) 765 - 5020 AREA = 2. 2612 ACRES P. O. BOX 909 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD , N. Y. 11971 - 89 - 342 r SOUryO `S`PNo b o \ N/O/IF WO/F H'ARNAN VIRGINA BENNETT EDNA TERRY MOORE MOSS " { {{ VI RGINA BENNETT AIOORE MOSSv W� � SOUTHOLD asi.aa' t- w, PARK ~ w N 440 aa' 07" E ww iv.i vac DISTRICT 44' e' �`\\ 104.08' goo KEY MAP °pp Yf• p M M •� - 30 WIDE R, 0 W . N 4a' 00' 00" E SCALE f"=600' W - Wcv Q O e `•E°t 4 O \ FIN. GRADE PROPERTY LINE L O T 1 O 2 E2 GAL FINISHED GRADE a tu 2 m STORAGE _ U 3 y/O, I I TANK I• MIN. �p MAX WELL 1 '' / MN. a Or Lu yc L'�J w v,^ 1ur;r� IL u- (D N — AREA 12005acres ? ,"PvO. TR { I1T�T gPvc 11{LI ' O y I FTQ ¢ i 1° u y .,MM ]00 S°.FT. ,I W Y LN+N ("CASIN 01 b Z Lu �" I 1 SIDE HALL AREP NO 69 . JT. LEACHING POOL T Z D_ Z 3— Lu0 Ef GR011N0 WAiEfl !00 GAL. - 10'MIN. W W y SEPTIC TANNOn Z C A sEPT1D TANN Q 1 / I \ SIIBMER910LE o- r - - I °'MIN. U O , \ 4EAOIWO p PUMP EG.D.P. 2'MIN� p0.GIN0 WATEN POOL MIN. S —^ —` ROAD ,1 I W S, 48' 00' 00" W. . I � �<. NAP INE s � TYPICAL WELL TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TYPICAL PLOT PLAN 37167, -I - 31LBT PAID � N. 48' 00' 00" E. - el : THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE' DISPOSAL :� I--' FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS 13 REOUI,REMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH LAND DIVISION _; A w y US 6y' - y h FOR Z - LOT .."I 2 � ,reu/' zzv (yw1 LAND - F° E G E C 2 t CHARLES H. L WI,. w c F � o F � e ti •� 9 O µ r,PB 2 w u D su J HEREBY CERTIFY FY THAT THIS MAP A6 MADE BY SFR M ACTUAL SURVEYS 9 � ., I H RE ER I I O 2d d �^ COMPLETED Acr C UALL AND THAT ALL CONCRETE MONUMENTS SNOWY THUS. q {; A O W FPA J i T SOUTHOLD 1 wL� !'" �•. C $ ACTUALLY IS AND THEIR POSITIONS 6 RE CORRECTLY SHOWN O a$ e�, � � HEREON ACT A Y E% T A N A Y H AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS RE CORRECT. �, •>t• TOWN OF SOUTHOLD $1 3 'KU TFh449c+eyOQ SUFFOLK COUNTY, M. Y. Z - - - _ _ SSSS J6/11N T. MET GE S. LIC. NO. 49618 OF NE`N O AREA = 1.060 acres 100050 050 - 03 14, 5 & 16 3 3 - 1 H = i Scale 1" = 30 ' Oct. 24, 198 h a ti PLANNING BOTHIS IS TO ARDIFY THETTOWN OF SOUTHOLD BY RESOLUS SUBDIVISION PLAN TION OF APPROVED BY THE C PIGS "No APPROVAL DATED Nov 20, 1989 ( revise ) Poe � SNr N 48' oo' 00' E laasa�MDM 2 W 118.00' S a' oo' 00. w Fro O ° -Cp Le I`I IS `_ O BY DATE p{A sTMh 25 WIDE R 0 w dp , CHAIRMAN PLANNING BOARD AR P.zs 11pp f0 tl A 170.00' S 47' 54' 37" W - - ^ IF Ott OCT 21990 O) N/O/F Naa'OP' "K BLDG. ZONE DISTRICT: R - 40 'I - — O FIRE DISTRICT: 28 N/O/F MUOLE KUDIIPKA I SCHOOL DISTRICT: 5 I I MESOALGNA KbON7KA R o w , OWNER AND APPLICANT; N /0 CHARLES . LEWISNCE SON pV EIry AVE . H E R I TECUMSEH , ONT NBNIW7 Z Premed h1 eeoerdame with the1efondyde for 60 suvinoys 487 h I"LLA.L.a. endipr oved .dpptorm Such uSS by ThS Kew York atAto LindTitle AS°oDIetlOn. SOUNDV/E�,rV PECONIC SURVEYORS , P. C . AVENUE ( 516 ) 765 - 5020 AREA 2.2612 ACRES P. O. BOX 909 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD 1 N. Y. 11971 - 89 - 342 This is to certify that the subdivision plan has been approved by the planning board of the Town of Southold by resolutionSOUND of approval dated ISLAND N LONG b N y Chairman Planning Board I hereby certify that this imp was made from actual surveys co ted Oce 24. iQa9 and that aN moumaents shown thus ■hereon aotu&Vy exist and their positions are "ray correctly shown and ail dimensional and Geodetic details are correct. ��-ANDS 25FNS. Jo T. Met4gWW. Y. S. LIC. NO. 49 18 j` $ F9 a \ Jd4 KEY MAP THE WATER SIMPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL N FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN T/IS DEVELOPMENTD.he P� WILL COMPLY W?H TW SMAIDARDS AM 9TF sss� �o Scale 7" = B00' REQLMWAIENTS OF ThE SUFFOLK COUNTY OF NL`I'I DEPARTMENT OF WEAL TM Sa\04 W E 0�5 31991 S AWN J<�0 / If saau o,t !Ilk �� a°�a�R � LAND DIVISION 10 0 �y5 sties FOR � 0. �� CHARLES H. LEWIS _^ \ �m �,���� �o`�� `gb �: A T SOUTHOLD '�� o0. aPa „ . 4ea o• ,/ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ago � �• �, � ;v i•'v � �_ SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. -oy a �•. 0'� 1000 - 50 - 03 - 14, 15 & 16 Scale 1" = 1oo' �" �z �e °�• \ \ OC t. 24, 1989 a A •oo Nov. 20, 1989(revise) J ; %y +� \ foo t. s % oo• \ June 28, 1991(reviae,) 5't \ \ �0� tr i� Sept 19, 1991 (revisions) of Z0 y�'°' G Z 4a. (f 7 �0 TOTAL AREA=2.2812 ACRES AREA LOT 1 = 55,183 sq. ft. AREA WETLANDS= 5,000 Sq. fta AREA LOT 2= 43,314 sq. ft — AVENUE TAX MAP LOT LINE VSE PROPERTY LME ouNo 82 GALLON IMSHEO GRADE- JI p 1 rrMMIEo °1'1p£ s OWNER/APPLICANT STORAGE 'MAX I'wR CHARLES H. LEWIS b EVAx WELL '"M'' BUILDING ZONE DISTRICT R - 40 - 710 LESPERANCE L TECUMSEH, ONT N8MW7 4' +"PVQT ' + PVC p SCHOOL DISTRICT 5 Sao M FT.4• CASWO $ e ° W sOf W.4.L AREA .1 LEACWG POOL HOUSE 28 DISTRICT 2B GNAUND WATER T am GALLON /a- IN 4 GC TAME SEPTC SURI1 TA °•My rs 6.P. Prepared in accordance with the minimum PUMP IR 'P'N' I _I''L"' i GROUNO WATER LEAF S standards for title surveys as established by the L.LA.L.S. andapproved anal ad ted ROAD for such use by The= York State Lath PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. TYPICAL WELLTide Association. (516) 765 - 5020 TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TYPICAL PLOT PLAN P. O. BOX 909 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 89 - 342 r' This is to certify that .the subdivision plan has been approved by the planning board of the Town of Southold by resolution ISLAND SOUND of approval dated N LONG by Chairman Plarming Board l heroby certify that thin map was' mads from acted surveys completed oc7 P4 IGa9 and that aN maam»nts + she thw a hereon eonry exist and their positions are correctly shown and all dimensional and Geodetic datalla -40 are correct �0� d Jo T. Mst Y. S LIC. NO. 49819 cI , Fi o KEY MAP THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL ZI FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS MV TIAN DEVELOPMENT 1l . 4 4� Scale 1- = 600' WILL{{//aeC77�EOM�LtPEMML1TTY WITH THE STANDARDS AAD E� NEtI RDEPARTIIENT OFOF hEAALLTM OLK COUNTY W E \6 o`y.1a QP S 0 Ole LAND DIVISION A o" P p� +''`t ss \\4 � � ' /a'°'� 0�`°' O � �`� CHARLES 10 H. LEWIS Jap �� ��� ;QIP. A T SOUTHOLD di" b � ° �� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD oTF �� ,.e; °off ` °I, ' � ,- ryo�� $:,� o`\ '4. 91 a /' SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. aT �, / a / '? �. 01 1000 - 50 - 03 - 14, 15 & 16 b� �° '/ a' Scale 1" = 100' Ar b,� 01 �J' �" Oct. 24 1989 Nov. 20, W9(revise) June 28, 1991(revise,) os'�• 5"°� ( �O f o 0 ,� o�F �^ Sept. 19, 1991 (revisionk) 1 ,db �� / �Po \ `$$a� Z� OCT. 30,1991 (revision$ ) �P� G 5 o1F 6 �' "?r TOTAL AREA=2.2812 ACRES j F AREA LOT 1 = 55,189 sq ft Iluunnujuj AREA WETLAf�S= 5,000 sq. ft± FEB 13 1992 U' AREA LOT 2 = 43,314 sq. ft. ACCESS TO LIGHTHOUSE ROATO BE D 25' WIDE vENr�E SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD TAX MAP LOT LINE O VIG�I FINISHED GRADE PROPERTY LIDE OWN G y, ,xrs0 eRAGE AAON ' `9 ;, e1 l OWNER/APPLICANT : TWGECHARLES H. LEWIS N , R - �0 S E BUILDING ZONE DISTRICT TECUMSEH. ONT NSMW7 �2 4- PVC T & NT 4-Pvc � ,p SCHOOL DISTRICT 6 y W i N SOO 50. FT. /• CASING m N SIDE HALL AREA NOMSE 28 LEACINMG POOL FIRE DISTRICT WA! WATER _ _ 1" GOO GALLON /O'IMI _ _ — S&F= TANS BEPM SU,,IERSIKE LEA TA ° IW/ Prepared in accordance with the minimum P( P !S G.P.M. I Vb r'N& RW OD NATER J'Iw stmrdsrda for title surveys as sstabbbed by the L.1.A.L.3 and roved end adopted PECONIC SURVEYORS P.C. ROAD for such ups byy The IVew York State Land 16) 766 TYPICAL WELL TitH A20 000/ation. P. BOX 809 TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TYPICAL PLOT PLAN MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD. N.Y. 11971 89 - 342 This is to certify that the subdivision plan has been approved ISLAND SOUND by the planning board of the Town of Southold by resolution of approval dated LONG N by Chairman Planning Board is I hereby certify that this map was made from actual anrrveys , completed ocr 26 L9 and that aN mounmants shown t7m heron actuaNy exist and their Positions are correctly shown and 0 dimensnonal and Geodetic details �o 4 8� are correct. John T. Met e . Y. S. LIC. NO. 48618 v 'M KEY MAP THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL �� !Q�- Scale 1" 600' FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT x WILL COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND ?rfoF N yU REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH W E 0� 00 0 QPK S , 0 /Olt XX LAND DIVISION FOR °�� s �" `�� i �°,�$ / 0 " M1°'� CHARLES H. LEGIS �' A T SOUTHOLD 0. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD GPL9 �o��. �' E �� P• SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. k° s ' [ , °0 e a �� o' 1000 - 50 - 03 - 14, 15 & 16 Scale 1" = 100' dipa� / mss. % r b� O P.g qa. `( _ ��,� ° ►► � \ P Oct. 24 1989 ,�t m ry Nov. 2 , 1911 rOviiae) �!! s k oa y� June 28, 1991(revise,) Qe� �0'4 ° � �,e ✓ �F Sept. 19, 1991 (revisionts) �qr; by '� e v `'; _ �,• #%o '� ��. OCT. 30,1991 (re visions ) 3a � N= \'' �✓ I\ oti^ P A tJ i July 24, 1993 (revisions) 9o�rL\h � 9 l � ��� G July 26, 1993(revisions) �Q TOTAL AREA=2.2612ACRES AREA LOT 1 = 55,183 sq. ft. AREA WETLANDS= 5,000 sq. ft+ AREAL OT 2 = 43,314 sq. ft. ACCESS. O°a+nroUSSE ROAD VIA 25' WIDE 0e ,TAX MAP LOT LINE � FINISHED OR OF PROPERTY LIRE 50 G OWNER/APPLICANT: .! J1 ,9 FINISHED GRADE GE GALLON CHARLES H. CE TANKAGE F,.WX u p•'y X WEAL' yac R - 40 - 710 LESPERANCE 1 1I BUILDING ZONE DISTRICT TECUMSEH, ONT N8NIW7 uq••nn r Ne••Pn r CANADA q'•PVC T N j�,��, q..PVC ,,6y SCHOOL DISTRICT 5 po 3G0 50. FT. \q' CASING u G SIDE WALL AREA HOUSE 26 �J- LEACMG POOL FIRE DISTRICTpR Jl1L 2 91993 T900 GALLON fO.- q GRAUNO WW=TEfl _ 11. SEPTIC TANK SEPTK "-" 8-W SUJl41bLU ID ffl Prepared in accordance with the minimum � ITeE; SUIMERSIELE LEA standard@ for title curves as estWehed PUW I3 G.P.Y. ) 0 2'HIN GROUND WATER S•IIPI 7 _ by the 4I.A.L.S and approved and adopted PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. ROAD for such use by The/Viw York State Lend (516) 765 - 5020 Title Assobfahon• P. O. BOX 909 TYPICAL WELL TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM TYPICAL PLOT PLAN MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11,971 89 - 342 This is to certify that the subdivision plan has been approved by the planning board of the Town of Southold by resolution SOUND of approval dated ISLAND N LONG b N y Chairman Planning Board I hereby certify that this map was made from actual surveys completed OCr 8411909 and that a9 mounments shown thus ■hereon actua9y exist and their positions are ' correctly shown and all dimensional and Geodetic details are correct nit Jo T. Met e . Y. S. LIC. NO. 49615 v/ r 0 KEY MAP THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL WILLIUC�OISIIPLyWITH THE IN RDS AID \ ."q`r +,���y y 3 REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK cOL9JTY C1F pt�W , Scale 1" = 600' DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH iy E �G O\y�R P S <�D / IF SID 0LAND DIVISION F 01 / .oma /- 0� a FOR r " 6 CHARLES H. LEWIS �� °'� '� ✓O�`�°° ;g 0 A T SOUTHOLD • '� b e°M14. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -off �d#�o�� % F \\ SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. °j ;;;o�� `` � o'., {d1'z5 °` s1 \ 1000 - 50 - 03- - 14, 15 & 16 e0 os. ' Q, f b � ' rte. $ `� Pc� \ Scale 1" = 100' "' / Oct. 24, 1989 -d \ Nov. 20, 1989(revise) 0 o°' ✓ June 28, 1991(revisej Oil P \ iC Sept 19, 1991 (revisions) L9r s ~' x gyp' a` v°a` S OCT. 30,1991 (revisions ) iJuly 24, 1993(revision's) '�e9�r� \�§a �' t s y�1e► \ `� �G July 26, 1993(revisions) 4+�F ° �pl�.CP �� ' TOTAL AREA=2.2612 ACRES AREA LOT 1 = 55,183 sq. ft. AREA WETLANDS= 5,000 sq. ft{ AREA LOT 2= 43,314 Sq. ft R.O.W.S TO OLOT TO BE VIA LIGHTHOV E ROAD 25' WIDE �E TAX MAP LOT LINE vIEw\N PVEN FINISHED GRADE PROPERTY LINE BE GALLON / H FlNawEO MADE OWNER/APPLICANT: STORAGE ,,N CHARLES H. LEWIS TANK. Q'NAX 6 PVAK WELL . MMM. BUILDING ZONE DISTRICT R - 40 - 710 LESPERANCE L 1 TECUMSEH, ONT N8NIW7 JUL 3 01993 v+••r... r 1 Ne••P..r 111111T _ T CANADA . SCHOOL DISTRICT 1'[AGING11 1 6 SOPTHOL TOW n TT 300 50. FT. b e IW' SIDE WALL AREA ` LEACHWG POOL HOUSE FIRE DISTRICT 28 NEW 900 GALLON GRI WATER _ _ q /D'MW •`P R.M!}P SEPTIC TANK SEPTIC lj Off? CB* TA :w SUBNERSaLE e ' fti `6�0 PIRIP 11 G.P.N. I P'MIN LEAW Prepared in accordance with the minimum .k GROUND WATER 5-W standards for title surveys as established by the L.I.A.L.S. andapproved and adopted ROAD for such use by The New York State Land PECWRO �/' FYP.C. TYPICAL WELL TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ' TYPICAL PLOT PLAN Title Association P. 0 MAI SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 89 - 342 the vision lan has been by This the planning fboardt of the Tot p Town of Southold by resolution SOUND of approval dated ISLAND N SONG by 1v Chairman Planning Board ■ . �'s I hereby certify that this map was made from actual surveys completed OCT 4 YOAa _and that aN molmments +. shown thus ehereon actually exist and their positions are correctly shown and all dimensional and Geodetic details are correct. Aft 4p, mtf John T. Met2gWW. Y. S. LIC. NO. 49818 ° {. + KEY MAP THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DOPOSAL FACILITES FOR ALL LOTS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT '"q ^, �s yp? Scale 1" = 600' WILL COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AAV Tp�, NW REOUNPE'MENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 7 vJ W E TOTAL AREA = 22612 Acres ?P�� AREA LOT 1= 55,183 sq.ft AREA WETLANDS=5,000 sq.ft± Jed / F k 0 o a AREALOT2= 43,314sq.ft "y LAND DIVISION FOR �°����v" CHARLES H. LEWIS AT SOUTHOLD s \ e+' ;�+` e� 1, �., �q, °a°� .,� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD „e;P:s; ' N GP`s y' �N� t { �''� � / SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. o '°h51 " &r° o'r�A 1000 - 50 - 03 - 14, 15 & 16 Scale 1" = 100' /• t/ 2 1989 Nov.ov. 20, 1989(revise) June 28, 1991(revlse.) ./ % � Sept. 19, 1991 (revisiona) o v `•a .�o;Fy+ ��, 't' y � 4. ry^^., �?. � � y� OCT. 30,1991 (revisions ) July 24, 1993(revision's) R�yrH'x yQ July 26, 1993(revisions) cb C, Aug. 17,1993(revisions) PROPERTY LNE f+,. WELL 1. WL O TIL' - 9•NPL /y LEACHING POOL -0 TV ---r5,wKWv ACCESS O LOT I O BE VIA 25' WIDE R.O.W. TO LIGHTHOUSE ROAD ROAD TYPICAL PLOT PLAN / / ---_ .TAX MAP LOT LINE vJEW P moo. 50 U140 FINISHED GRADE �• FINISHED (MADE 94�. � O WNERLAPPLICANT, Gz GauDN CHARLES H LEWIS TANKAGE I'MIN 'MAX TANK 'MAXEz•NAR - 40 - 710 U S EH. O E - eL 1 i BUILD/NG ZONE DISTRICT TECUMSEH, ONT NBN/W7 vr'PA, ' Ll ve^P.- r• 5 CANADA — a^Pvc T o . "I Pvc SCHOOL DISTRICT - -•• j- C LJ W N m 300 SD. FT. �� L] +• CASING b - $ S WE MALL ARF! 4 28 1 ����md—� LEACHING POGL FIRE DISTRICT l T 900 GALLON AUG 3 1 1993 GRAUNU WATER _ = a.., SEPTIC TANK —_ SLIPWRSIBLE P Prepared in accordance with the minimum s°ANU TOWN PLANNING G PUMP IS G.P.Y. MIN_ ago uNG W=TER atL/dardl for title surveys as established - BOARD by the L./.A.L.S. and approved and adopted PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. for such use by The New York State Land (518) 785 - 5020 TYPICAL WELL TYPICAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM Title Association P. O. BOX 909 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 Ll 89 - 342