HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-55.-6-35 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERO�SVFF�(A'CO •
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. �Q G� P.O. Box 1179
Chairman Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
WILLIAM J.CREMERS Z Southold, New York 11971-0959
KENNETH L.EDWARDS O Telephone (631) 765-1935
GEORGCHARDHCIE LATHAM,AGG O JB, y'1101 �aO� Fax (631) 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
February 12, 2002
Mr. Jeffery L. Seeman, CEP REM
Coastal Environmental Corporation
42 Lewis Road
East Quogue,New York 11942
Re: Bayberry Estates Subdivision
SCTM# 1000-55-6-3.5 and 1000-56-1-1
Dear Mr. Seeman:
In response to your October 11, 2001 letter, the Planning Board has reviewed the above file. As indicated
in Ms. Spiro's prior letters dated June 26, 1997 and June 18, 1996,preliminary approval of the application
has expired.
Due to the extensive time lapse, a new application with updated fees and environmental assessment forms
must be submitted for further consideration of the above project.
If you have any questions,please contact Mark Terry from my office at 765-1938 extension 243.
Sincerely,
Bennett Or owski
Chairman
LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART III - EVALUATION OF IMPACTS
GROUP
BAYBERRY ESTATES SUBDIVISION
' SCTM #1000-55-6-35,
36 AND 56-1-1
' LAUREL AVENUE
SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
NEW YORK
1
1
1
LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
PART III - EVALUATION OF IMPACT
BAYBERRY ESTATES SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN
PROPOSED ACTION: Residential Cluster Subdivision
PROJECT LOCATION: Laurel Avenue
SCTM 1000-55-6-35 , 36
and 56-1-1
Southold, New York
APPLICANT: Dr. Francis O'Malley
_ c/o Mars Sloan & Conlon
_ 1770 Motor Parkway
Hauppauge, New York 11788
Mr. Donald Rettaliata, Attorney
FILING AGENCY: Planning Board Office
Town of Southold
' 53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
PREPARER AND CONTACT: Maguire Group
Architects/Engineers/Planners P.C.
3237 Route 112 Suite 7A
Medford, NY 11763
' ( 516 ) 696-6007
J frey L. Seeman, REM, REA
' "\RoNMF�II
ZuQ
cc S
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOPIC SECTION
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . 0
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . 0
IMPACT ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 0
* Land Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 1
* Water Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 2
* Vegetation & Wildlife Resources . . . . . . . . . 3 . 3
* Agriculture Land Resources . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 4
* Open Space: & Recreation Resources . . . . . . . . 3 . 5
GENERAL ASSESSMENTS & CONCLUSIONS STATEMENT . . . . . . . 4 . 0
PHOTOGRAPHS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . 0
BAYBERRY ESTATES SKETCH PLAN, OCTOBER 1989 . . . . . . . 6 . 0
APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . 0
' 1 . Environmental Assessment Form Dated May 1987
2 . Test Hole Data/Sketch Plan Dated June 13 , 1989
3 . Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Report of February 19 , 1991
LIST OF REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. 0
-- 1.0 INTRODUCTION
The proposed action involves Suffolk County Tax Map number
(SCTM# ) 1000-55-35-36 and 56-1-1 under application to subdivide
50 . 0171 acres to provide an 18 lot clustered subdivision along
the west side of Laurel Avenue, Town of Southold, New York. The
subject site is located approximately 700 linear feet north of
Main Road (NYS Rt. 25 ) and 150 linear feet south of Yennecott
Drive; for site development a ± 1600 linear foot access roadway
is proposed with connection to Laurel Avenue.
In accordance with New York State Quality Review part 617 (SEQR)
a Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) Part I was filed
together with the proposed Bayberry Estates Subdivision Map
(Young & Young) in May 1987 . Subsequent revisions to the map
- have resulted in the current layout - "Cluster" Subdivision
Sketch Plan prepared for Bayberry Estates at Southold, October
23 , 1989 (Young & Young) . An addendum to the LEAF was filed in
August 1990 , at the request of the Planning Board, Town of
Southold. Southol.d' s environmental consultants, Cramer, Voorhis
& Associates ( CVA) reviewed the application and filed a report
_ with the Town in February 1991. The CVA report recommended the
Planning Board request a completed LEAF Part III - Evaluation of
_ Impact Narrative to further assess significance of impact.
Resources of concern include:
1 . Impact on Land
' * Construction on slopes of 15% or greater.
* Construction in an area containing intermittent streams
and poor soils.
2 . Impact on Water
* Action requires use of a municipal water supply that has
not approved availability.
* Suitability of soils and subsoils for sanitary disposal.
* Impact to wetlands ; natural drainage and hydrology.
3 . Impact on Plants and Animals
* Site supports wildlife habitats for raptors, heron, deer,
and herptiles of species of special concern and potential
1 threatened species status as identified by New York State
and/or Federal lists.
4 . Impact on Agricultural Land Resources
* Proposed action would irreversibly convert more than ten
acres of agricultural land.
5 . Impact on Open Space
I * Potential :reduction of open space.
1
The Maguire Group was engaged by the applicant to prepare the
LEAF Part III narrative. The assessments and impact analyses
presented in this document are based on current and previously
accepted reports and data, Maguire ' s field observations and our
professional interpretation of this scientific and engineering
information. where applicable, the narrative proposes mitigation
_ plans to reduce impact significance. The minor revisions to the
subdivision sketch resulting from mitigation are not included
with this report. This information will be submitted upon
request, in response to the Town' s comments and findings to the
Part III .
Additionally, to enhance brevity, reproduction of standard
technical documents used in preparation of this report has been
excluded. A complete list of references is included at the end
of this report. (Refer to Section 8 . 0 List of References or
contact Maguire Group directly) .
2
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
-- The Applicant proposes to subdivide a 50 . 0171 acre parcel into an
18 lot, clustered residential subdivision known as "Bayberry
Estates" . The property is an irregular shaped piece, located
±700 feet north of New York State Route 25 with approximately
1„760 feet of frontage along the west side of Laurel Avenue, Town
of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The proposed Subdivision
Sketch Plan prepared by Young & Young dated October 23 , 1989
provides for 15 lots ( lot# ' s 3-10 , 12-18 ) designed around two cul
de sacs placed ( as spurs) north, and south off the east - west
1 , 600 LF access road. A third cul de sac provides for access to
_ a single lot ( lotl# 11 ) and dead ends the road at the western
boundary. The two additional lots, numbers 1 and 2 are located
in the north-east corner of the site with direct access from
Laurel Avenue. The Long Island Rail Road tracks border the site
to the south. To the north, are residential homes and a park;
■ Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) power lines and towers
transect (northeast to southwest) the site in the northerly area,
r extending to the property edge. To the west is "High Point
Meadows” and to the east, "Long Pond Estates" , residential
subdivisions currently under construction.
' Zoning use district for the site is designated "R-80" ,
residential low density "A" ; the action conforms with current
land use ordinances. The site contains a New York State
' Freshwater Wetland; flagged by the State on June 1 , 1989 . The
wetlands area appears on the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Preliminary Freshwater
' Wetland Map dated May 31 , 1991. The wetland area is also shown,
together with the State required 100 foot buffer zone, on the
October 23 , 1989 Subdivision Sketch for Bayberry Estates . All
proposed lots and structures remain outside the wetlands buffer
zone. The applicant has proposed a 33 . 9 ± acre open space area,
the majority of which includes the wetlands and a contiguous
upland zone. This area also provides a deep buffer to the
' existing residential lots along the north boundary, and along the
west boundary. Actual development is clustered within a zone
approximately 300 feet north of the existing railroad tracks and
600 feet west from Laurel Avenue.
3
3.0 IMPACT ANALYSES
_ 3.1 Land Resources
Construction on Slone of 15°% or Greater
This action requires minor areas of construction on slopes
greater than 15%. The impact results from the combined affects
of the natural topography ( >15% slope) and the proposed use of
the area for a stormwater recharge basin, roadway and cul de sac.
The cul de sac provides access to lot #11 . It is suggested, by
the CVA analysis , that lot 411 be accessed by a private drive to
avoid a need for the cul de sac and reduce fill required for its
construction. The total area of construction on slopes greater
- than 15% is relatively small when compared to the entire parcel
( less than 2% of the total area) . To reduce slope impacts by
allowing access to lot #11 via a private drive is reasonable,
providing the tap road alignment with the parcel to the west can
be achieved.
One alternative examined included relocating the recharge basin
to an area south of lot #11 ( and provide the private drive
access ) . This would further mitigate impacts to slopes greater
than 15% and avoid disturbing the natural topography. While
■ impact to slopes would be reduced, the redirection of the site ' s
collected stormwater would reduce the quantity of run-off now
entering the natural swale area north of lot #11. Subsequently
disturbance to the overall natural drainage pattern and hydrology
is expected by this alternative. The area of impact is specific
' to the impervious road surface area where run-off is controlled
by the proposed stormwater collection and storage system. This
alternative is expected to adversely impact natural hydrology and
could contribute to wetland deterioration.
Therefore, it is more desirable to retain location of the
recharge basin as shown on the subdivision map dated October 1989
t and utilize the existing topography and natural drainage basin.
Only minor impacts are expected. It is also reasonable to
predict that construction on slopes greater than 15% can be
' mitigated by minor design changes. The area of construction
along the 15% slope is not very significant. When compared to
the site ' s area, the impact occurs to less than 2% of the parcel.
Therefore, the importance of the impact on land caused by
construction on slopes of greater than 15% is of minor to
moderate significance.
Intermittent Streams/Poor Soils
The proposed action, was assessed by CVA to require construction
in an area containing intermittent streams and poor soils.
' 4
The U. S. Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of Suffolk
County, New York, existing topographic maps and test hole data
recorded in June 1989 indicate conditions exist that may support
intermittent, perched stream activity; particularly in the area
where the recharge basin is proposed. Field visits and
observations did not confirm presence or absence of intermittent
stream activity. The site ' s soil types are classified as:
_ Haven loam of 2%-6o slopes
Haven loam of 0%-2% slopes
Plymouth gravelly loamy sand of 3%-8% slopes, eroded
Plymouth gravelly loamy sand of 8%-15% slopes , eroded
Canadice silt loam
These soil types have generally acceptable engineering
limitations for building except for the Canadice silt loam.
According to the Soil Survey, the Canadice silt loam soils are
seasonally wet and their slow permeability in the upper horizons
provide a less desirable use for drainage structures . However, 5
to 6 feet below the upper soil level the Canadice silt loam has
very rapid permeability characteristics. This would provide a
suitable soil for stormwater recharge; providing the upper soil
level is excavated/or excavated and back filled with clean fill
material, suitable for recharge basin design and construction.
It is feasible to locate the recharge basin as proposed on the
Bayberry Estates sketch plan, providing these soil
' characteristics and construction considerations are addressed.
To reduce disruption to area hydrology, it is suggested that an
outlet such as a positive overflow pipe or spillway be provided
at the recharge basin. The outlet would outfall to the natural
swale area ( remaining after basin construction) immediately north
of the proposed recharge basin, and supplement the natural
hydrology which may currently support the wetland area. This may
' be particularly important during low rainfall events. The
elevation of the outlet should be considered in the final design
of the stormwater control plan.
' An alternative design scheme would provide relocation of the
recharge basin to the south of lot #11. Providing the soils are
' suitable for recharge, an overflow structure would not be
suggested. Under this alternative design, the natural swale area
which exists north of lot #11 would remain undisturbed.
Hydrology may be impacted particularly during periods of low
' precipitation. However, the impact to hydrology would likely be
moderate to minor because the run-off that now enters the natural
swale would continue to flow to the swale after development, with
' exception for the quantity of run-off altered by the proposed
roadway and drainage collection system. This would be directed
to the new recharge basin south of lot #11.
It is our opinion the recharge basin is more suitably located as
shown on the Bayberry Estates Sketch Plan dated October 1989
(north of lot #11 ) . As a mitigation for potential impact to
hydrology an overflow outlet to the natural swale area should be
provided.
i 5
Dependent on future test hole results, the existing soil in the
recharge basin area may need to be excavated to a depth of 5 to 6
feet and suitable fill placed in the effective area of recharge
within the basin bottom and walls. This mitigation may be
required whether the recharge basin is placed north or south of
lot #11 . It is more the result of engineering limitations of the
soil conditions and not purely the result of significant impact
or proposed mitigation. Therefore if the existing soils are
_ determined not to be Canadice silt loam in either area proposed
for the recharge basin, there may be no need for additional
excavation and fill; and disturbance to hydrology is expected to
result in only moderate or minor impacts .
' 6
-- 3.2 Water Resources
Water Supply
The action requires drinking water supply from the Greenport
Water District. This water purveyor has experienced supply
limitation, and the proposed Bayberry Estates subdivision will
have an impact on water supply resources. A typical family of
four will use approximately 90 gallons per capita per day for
drinking, food preparation, washing and sanitary needs. Although
water conserving devices ( i.e. low flush water closets, flow
restrictors , etc. ) are becoming standard in modern residences , a
figure of 360 gallons per day per unit is assumed to be an
acceptable water demand level for Bayberry Estates. This
computes to an overall site demand of 6, 480 gallons per day ( say
6 , 500 GPD) .
The impact to drinking water supply cannot be thoroughly
evaluated at this time. The applicant has requested a statement
of availability from Greenport Water company. The response from
the purveyor, indicates water will be provided for the project at
a future date. If water is not available, the project cannot be
built; there would. be no predictable impact to water resources
under a no build scenario. If the purveyor grants water supply,
it. is anticipated that (because water is available) the impact to
water resources would be only of minor to moderate significance.
tSanitary Disposal
Each residential unit is expected to generate 300 GPD of sanitary
discharge. These flows are recommended by design standards
suggested by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services ,
(SCDOH) the agency that will review and respond to sanitary plans
for the subdivision. No municipal sewer system exists in this
area of Southold, and it is desired to utilize an individual
septic system for each lot. As required for the SCDOH approval
of: sanitary waste disposal designs, test pits must be excavated
and inspected for each septic system. Soil permeability
characteristics will be evaluated with respect to leaching
capability. If soil types are unsuitable for septic systems
' design, leaching pool areas can be excavated to an acceptable
depth and backfilled with clean sand to provide suitable disposal
conditions . Minimum lot areas accepted by SCDOH for septic use
is 20 , 000 SF. The Young & Young yield plan is well within these
' regulations .
Lot numbers 9 and 10 and 6 and 7 are contiguous to and at higher
elevations (±10 feet) than the wetlands/buffer area. There is
concern for potential impact to the surface water, intermittent
stream, wetland hydrology from sanitary disposal generated from
these four lots . The sanitary flows generated from the entire
' subdivision is also a concern with regard to groundwater impacts.
i
There is always concern for the pollution impacts to water
resources generated from land development, on Long Island,
particularly in Eastern Suffolk County. Municipal sanitary sewer
- systems and treatment facilities can provide some control to
sanitary waste disposal, but availability is often limited in
areas of Suffolk.
Existing treatment facilities are experiencing operational
_ difficulties on the East End, largely due to capacity and design
limitations of the plants. In June of 1991 , the NYSDEC assessed
the success of Denitrification Systems use in Suffolk County.
These sanitary disposal systems were designed to remove nitrogen
from sanitary wastewaters; and allow the nitrogen depleted
_ wastewater to leach back to groundwater. The method expected a
— reduction in nitrogen loading of water resources and to restore
water to groundwater resources. As of this date, the NYSDEC
determined that the Denitrification System is not an acceptable
method for sanitary waste disposal in Suffolk County.
■
Subsequently, Bayberry Estates is exclusively limited to
individual septic system use for sanitary waste disposal in
accordance with Suffolk County Department of Health and NYSDEC
requirements. It is upon this criteria that a determination of
no other reasonable alternative can be proposed and assessed for
' sanitary disposal. Therefore only septic system disposal impacts
are evaluated.
Impact from nitrogen laden wastewater on water resources can be
theoretically quantified. Nitrogen loading from septic system
disposal can be calculated, and a zone of influence established
to determine and assess pollutant loading impact of nitrogen on
ground and surface water. For the assessment groundwater
monitoring wells, test pits, soils taxonomy and characteristics ,
hydrologic data (vertical and horizontal flow direction and
' quantitative data for surface and subsurface water including
intermittent stream activity if present etc. ) would need to be
established. Additionally, the effect that the disposal method
would have on wetland deterioration could require a Wetland
Evaluation Technique (WET) analysis and assessment be conducted.
The WET method is a wetland qualitative assessment developed by
I the US Army Corp of Engineers & USEPA requiring extensive, long
range field and historic data collection for 144 parameters. The
LEAF Part III narrative does not require assessment in the detail
described above. Generally this type of environmental assessment
' is conducted for regional impacts on wetlands and water quality.
If conducted for Bayberry Estates, these detailed assessments
would be misapplied; examining only a small geographic area and
disregarding impacts caused by regional and seasonal influences.
This approach was ruled out for the Part III Narrative because of
its nonconformance. Generally, nitrogen loadings in densely
developed areas are a concern to groundwater impacts . Impacts
from the 18 lot clustered development over 50 acres will have
lesser significance than projects of higher density. Obviously a
net increase in nitrogen loading of water resources is
unavoidable. The effect of nitrogen may be lessened by the plant
life in the wetland area and buffer zones. Vegetation utilizes
8
nitrogen as a nutrient, collecting the compound through the plant
root system. Providing the soils permit adequate leaching of
sanitary waste, nitrogen concentrations are expected to be
- diluted by interaction with natural hydrologic conditions and
absorbed by plant life sustained by existing wetland and/or
upland conditions.
This may reduce impact to a degree which can only be
theoretically determined by long range multifaceted field and
historic data assessment. Providing the septic systems are
adequately maintained and land use limited to acceptable density,
water resource deterioration from Bayberry Estates is at this
time not quantifiable but expected to be of moderate impact. The
SCDOH regulations and review will provide for future and final
determination of sanitary disposal methods .
It is recommended to review the SCDOH evaluation for a final
evaluation of water resource impacts.
Impact to Intermittent Stream and Wetlands
The use of the southwest corner of the site and impact concerns
regarding potential intermittent stream activity and wetland
resources has been presented in Sections 3 . 1 and 3 . 2. The
importance of the wetlands and uplands for habitats for plants
and animals is more extensively evaluated in Section 3 . 3 .
9
3.3 Vegetation and Wildlife Resources
It has been reported the site supports raptors, heron, deer and
herptiles , potential threatened species and species of special
concern.
The Town of Southold required that the site' s habitats and
wildlife be characterized as support for maximum preservation of
_. open space through clustering.
Description of EcolcLcjy
The site is characterized by wetland and upland environments that
provide ecologically significant habitats for a diverse
population of wildlife and vegetation. To observe and record
habitat conditions, Maguire Group conducted a field visit and
pre" iminary assessment on June 10 , 1991.
The wetland area delineated by NYSDEC includes a stillwater pond
approximately 60 feet wide and 100 feet in length (with an
unknown depth) . The pond' s perimeter is heavily vegetated with
almost no areas of open space along the banks. The transition
zone between the wetland and upland area is also densely
vegetated with saplings and shrubs .
Soil survey maps and an evaluation by CVA (CVA February 15, 1991)
suggest the wetland is indicative of intermittent stream
t activity. However, the lack of a formulative transition zone
sustaining a dominance of faculative wetland vegetation and the
density of shrub and saplings in the wetland area and pond,
' suggests the surface water may be resultant of an abandoned man
made irrigation pond. Test hole data in the wetland zone shows
the presence of hydric soils , and this area may in fact be the
zone where the Canadice silt loam soils predominate. It would be
sensible from an agricultural viewpoint to locate an irrigation
pond in this area because the upper soil level would retain
water. This area is too wet to sustain mature trees in the pond
and several fallen trees were observed, Red-osier dogwood tree
stumps were observed with a ±3" caliper, with new shoots
generation. Black gum, Red maple, wild grape and sensitive fern
' also characterize the swamp and bank area. The vegetation of the
upland area is indicative of old field and judging from the
wetland and pond vegetation, the site may have been abandoned for
agricultural use 25 to 30 years ago.
1 Areas within the wetlands have been disturbed; a 55 gallon drum,
abandoned farm equipment and several large deposits of scallop
shells were observed. This disturbance is minor and generally
the wetland is well protected by vegetation and not easily
accessed by man, resulting in a high quality wetland area.
i 10
These conditions provide for wildlife habitats classified as
"Shrub Swamp" . Beyond the swamp, in the poorly defined
transition zone and upland area, the habitat is characteristic of
"Shrub Sapling/Opening Edge" . These two habitats, while
separated by a NYSDEC jurisdictional delineation, are
interrelated ecological zones. The swamp provides food and
shelter for birds, mammals, vegetation, insects and herptiles
which themselves act: as food source for upland birds and mammals.
Wildlife hunting space includes the shrub sapling/opening edge
and the open upland area to the north of the site, especially
important to avian predators. Deer lays were observed in the
shrub sapling/opening edge; frogs and turtles visually and
audibly identified :in the shrub swamp; rabbits, catbirds mourning
doves, crow, northern flicker, mocking bird and sparrow also
visually and or audibly observed.
Upland vegetation included but was not limited to gray birch,
weeping willow, eastern red cedar, white birch, Russian olive,
red oak, eastern Baccharis ( saltbrush) and varieties of golden
rod, ferns , Rosa multiflora, grasses and poison ivy. The
vegetation in the upland area provides ground cover, avian
cover/nesting areas and shelter. The open areas are suitable for
_ raptor feeding on small mammals. The CVA report supports the
assessment of wildlife habitat abundance by visual observation of
species and presence of spent shells from use of the property by
hunters.
Evaluation
The NYSDEC published list (which includes the Federal list) of
potentially threatened species and species of special concern,
' and the State list of protected plants identify vegetation and
wildlife protected by State Conservation law. There is
indication that the natural environment of the site can or does
provide permanent and/or periodic habitat for several species of
protected plants and animals.
The area of open space provided in the Bayberry Estates Sketch
1 Plan is warranted and its geographical location with respect to
natural wildlife habitat co-existance with the proposed clustered
subdivision is well selected. The wetland area in the west area
of the site is as ecologically significant to the habitats in the
northerly open space area as is the open uplands importance to
the wetlands . The 100 foot wetlands buffer provides both a
protection to the designated wetland area and an enhanced
transition area that extends the shrub sapling/ opening edge
habitat into the habitats defined by upland area. The plan
provides preservation of low ground cover, open field, mature
' trees , wet areas and areas of transition among a mixture of
habitats. This permits wildlife movement on the ground and in
the air for purposes of nesting, hunting and hiding, unrestricted
by manmade features. Generally it is not the pure presence of
people that disturbs wildlife habitat but rather man' s physical
changes that create problems. Physical change can be minor as
with walking through a field and disturbing a rabbit to the more
extreme level of a major agricultural development that would
remove all natural habitats , vegetation, disturb hydrology, etc.
� 11
Therefore , to further encourage preservation the clustered
development is well placed within the site, with respect to the
more valuable natural resource area. Some disruption to wildlife
will occur, habitats will be significantly disturbed in areas of
development; this is resource loss and impact which cannot be
avoided. As construction takes place, the animals from these
habitats will likely seek refuge in the preserved area or
relocate to areas off-site. The wildlife that cannot relocate
may not survive, however the disruption is limited and may be
outweighed by the continuity of the preserved areas ; more likely
to support habitats for species of protection and concern.
The habitats for plant and wildlife preservation may be enhanced
by the long range impact of the residential development. There
may be protected species that under current conditions are being
destroyed by unlawful hunting and trapping practices. If the
residents elect to prohibit hunting and trapping of animals and
restrict access to the open space zones, sensitive habitats will
_ be protected. This is expected if a natural resource management
program is developed and maintained. It is not encouraged to
obstruct the open areas with fencing or structures that would
restrict wildlife movement. Enhancing the perimeter with natural
landscaping that would screen out unnatural movement and
_ discourage entry by people, but still allow for lateral movement
of wildlife between habitats, is permissible. Future placement
w of an osprey platform may provide additional wildlife refuge.
Attention to future development and potential impacts from the
i area along the west boundary of Bayberry Estates should be
considered. Ideally this parcel should include a zone of open
space preservation contiguous to the area proposed by Bayberry
1 Estates .
The impact to wildlife and vegetation is considered moderate
because of the balance between preservation of the existing more
i valuable natural resource area and a low density cluster plan;
albeit these are forms of mitigation.
i
i
1
i
1
i
1 12
PARTIAL LISTING OF SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED TO EXIST IN
HABITATS - By Common Name
ANIMALS:
*Great Blue Heron *Eastern Screech Owl
*Great Egret *American Goldfinch
*Snowy Egret *Mourning Dove
*Common Yellow Throat Redwing Blackbird
*Swamp Sparrow Crow
*Northern Harries: *Brown Headed Cowbird
Bull Frog *Northern Flicker
Green Frog *Brown Thrasher
Wood Frog *Mocking Bird
Spotted Salamander Field Sparrow
Eastern Newt Eastern Cottontail
_ Two lined Salamander White Tailed Deer
Snapping Turtle Eastern Harvest Mouse
Painted Turtle *Eastern Box Turtle
_ Eastern Ribbon Snake *Alder Fly Catcher
*Red Tailed Hawk Northern Leopard Frog
Red Bat ***Osprey
*Gray Catbird
VEGETATION:
iRed Oak Poison Ivy
Eastern Red Juniper **Golden Rod
' Red Swamp Maple Chokeberry
Black Gum Milkweed
Gray Birch Saltbrush
**White Birch Russian Olive
Crested Wood Fern Weeping Willow
Sensitive Fern Rosa Multiflora
**Alder Duckweed
Sassafras Common Ragweed
**Wild Grape Catalpa
* Protected wildlife in New York State
** Some species of these plants are protected by New York State
*** Threatened species of wildlife
13
71 - 06z •�� , �7
rJ 12 ' r+a r - -•. - IOY .��sel�\ 1t"z+ - -a
�0 "LU
j�\ L'�'�1L/�J� - .•o% �\, �" � ' -� - �+yq`-��'4 !� , yam`=y�i-�' �. _v
IO
/ /�. a / 77
SO-4.
a 9 Jennings Pt
Beix
WNARY FRESIOATER WETLAN r�
MAP . SUBIEC -t0 REV�StON`,;<s rF
r �southo>
-k 8.:�. This is a sfction of the
o. J Tentative',freshw� ter Wetlands Map I S I
dor GQJ�L-- ouniy
F°°nda Prared urs cant to Artict� of he Environrtental
eP 63 JS
2� R I� ISLI
Landing
Park Jr
Harpers a Con
t' a C �+
Pt J
Cr New York State QepartrrsentE-p\\ntentai
1 l °`kgy Southold Conservation -1 ,
:,, Bay,. ,7 � "� /�� ��/rJ�.g�1_, . .0 �.- _'•\ .
3 O
�9M
i'20 •d r ri'. _
(. _ � ,.. ( '• \ ' �'�-mow.'• _ ... � - ': 1T `-..._
26 Parad
I Soulno�d
/• ],7,__- - i- s a Yacht Clu _s Point
7 lo
it
dl :2s .u. ,o �rr. e. , �I}n� '� 2 IIJ1:� J •3 -
Ir
q Y9 ' rP
`3a�
".\ 7/n,
no
/ �.� l�.t r�/-'-'•I V eci�,= �
'+-.-�:f y� � C�•eo —'-^� -��p�' n tC � --�o tie o �Il
/�� .. y r --� -s°��7 a-= J Y:s ca- YC7 F --��r, ( eda �PAAX'
14
3 . 4 Agricultural Land Resources
The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres
of agricultural land, into a residential land use. An impact to
agricultural land use was a noted concern.
_ The site is assessed to have some agricultural value albeit
limited in area by some soil types, wetlands and the natural
topography conditions ; obstacles in converting the land for
agriculture. Evidenced by the old field vegetation, and what may
be an old irrigation pond, sections of the site may, in the past,
been farmed. Development of the site for residential purpose
will have unavoidable long term impact to the use of the site for
agriculture. Other sites exist in Southold where agricultural
use could be considered. The subdivisions under construction to
the west of the site and along the east side of Laurel Avenue
create a compatible land use with the proposed action but compete
with overall land to remain for farming. Bayberry Estates
exacerbates the condition of land use for residential development
that historically was planned for farm use. This impact to land
use (with focus on agricultural land resources in Southold
Township) was assessed by comparing the subdivision impacts to
agricultural impacts.
' The alternative land use for agricultural purposes may have a
more significant adverse impact over several environmental
concerns:
' * Disturbance to Natural Hydrologic Conditions - due to
regrading and potential to significantly alter natural
drainage to attain maximum site yield.
* Potential for Surface Water Contamination - Agricultural
' use could provide a high risk to wetland deterioration if
herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers are misapplied or
if an accidental spill occurs.
* Removal of Natural Vegetation - converting the site would
drastically and potentially, irreversibly destroy habitats
preserved by the Bayberry cluster plan. Similar
preservation of the habitats could result in economic
hardships to farming a restricted site by reduction of
crop yield and land use. Natural resource availability
within Southold Township, would be reduced if sections of
the site were not preserved for open space.
A productive use of approximately twenty acres of agricultural
' land resources would adversely impact area wide farmland use.
This impact must be weighed by the potential deterioration of the
site ' s ecological value in comparing impacts between the cluster
' residential and agricultural uses. Relative to this comparative
analysis, impact significance to agriculture is expected to be
moderate to minor.
15
3 5 Open Space and Recreation Resources
The development of`. the 18 lot cluster subdivision will
potentially reduce open space and recreational resources in
Southold.
The proposed action provides slightly more than 30 acres of open
space area. The cluster unit plan concentrates the area of
development and provides essential open space which includes an
important wetland - transition zone - upland continuity. As
stated in section 3 . 3 the natural existing ecology is best
supported by this land preservation approach.
-- The lack of disturbance to this mix of habitats is important to
recognize when considering open space and recreation. Even
passive recreation (hiking, exercise trails , etc. ) can disrupt
sensitive nesting and hunting habits of birds , reptiles and
amphibians. The picking or transplant of New York State
protected plants :is ecologically damaging and unlawful. To
reduce the occurrence of ecological degradation even by
' unintentional practices, the open space areas are not recommended
for recreational use. Recreational suitability is also
questionable because of the density of vegetation in some areas.
' Attempts to eradicate nuisance vegetation ( i.e. poison ivy) could
have more significant impact on other plants and animals.
Similarly uncontrolled hunting, fishing and trapping could damage
the natural resource value of the open space areas .
The subdivision will predictably restrict access to the site by
the general public. This results in a net loss of available,
' public recreational space but a net gain in controlled open space
resource management. There is a park along the North border of
the site ; recreational facilities exist in the immediate area.
' Therefore, the cluster plan supports open space preservation and
impact to open space and area lost for recreation is of moderate
to minor significance.
' 16
4.0 General Assessment and Conclusions Statement
The proposed action impact concerns predominate on the sensitive
_ environmental conditions established by the existing wetland
system and its inter-relationship with transition zone and upland
- ecological natural. resource values. While intermittent stream
activity cannot conclusively be verified or denied, the parcel
has valuable wet resources including hydrophytic vegetation,
- aquatic wildlife, water dependent species and hydric soil
conditions. These: characteristics are equally important to the
- upland habitats that greatly depend on the wet area for survival.
The Bayberry Estates cluster subdivision as presented in the
Young & Young Sketch Plan, has produced an extreme and cautious
approach to avoid disturbance of the site' s natural resources .
Several additional_ mitigating measures proposed in the Cramer,
Voorhis & Associates Bayberry Estates Lona EAF Review Report,
' February 1991 concur with Maguire Group' s specific assessments .
Construction on slopes of 15% or greater can be further mitigated
by accessing lot till with a private driveway, thus eliminating
the cul de sac at the westerly terminus of the access road.
' Suitability of soils for stormwater recharge can be mitigated by
either:
1 ) Relocation of the recharge basin to the south of lot #11
(although this may adversely impact wetland related
hydrology)
' 2 ) Locating the recharge basin as proposed, excavating
unsuitable soil and backfilling the effective area of
recharge with suitable material. To encourage natural
hydrology supporting the wetlands , an outlet structure is
suggested at the north end of the recharge basin.
Suitability of soils for sanitary waste disposal can be mitigated
by:
1 ) Evaluation of test pit information as required by Suffolk
County Department of Health prior to sanitary disposal
plan approval.
2 ) Removal of unsuitable soils and replacement with soils
' acceptable for septic leaching
Availability of drinking water supply must be confirmed by the
' Greenport Water Company. Physically, water supply is readily
available from the main running north and south along the west
side of Laurel Avenue. If water is not available, there would be
no net loss of water resources.
Disruption to potential intermittent stream activity and the
wetland area has been minimized by clustering and by suggestions
' regarding drainage and sanitary structures .
17
Habitats for valuable vegetation and wildlife resources have been
carefully preserved by cluster designs. The upland/wetland open
space is largely contiguous with total open space comprising
about 600 of the site.
Agricultural land resource reduced by the residential use
development of more than 10 acres of agricultural is an
unavoidable impact. It is assessed that if the natural resource
of the site ' s ecology is preserved, approximately 20 acres remain
for farming. The practicality of crop yield for ± 50 acre site
is questionable. Potential impacts to the environmentally
sensitive areas caused by agricultural pesticides and herbicides,
alteration to hydrology and suitability of soils for agriculture
may greatly reduce agricultural value, and/or adversely impact
significant ecological land value.
The Bayberry Estates plan supports open space goals by use of
' subdivision cluster techniques. Recreational activity of the
site will likely be restricted to the immediate homeowners.
Providing an acceptable natural resource program is implemented
' and. maintained, unauthorized (hunting, trapping, vegetation
removal) activities will be minimized. This could result in an
overall protection to sensitive habitats. Additionally, other
' recreational areas are provided within reasonable distance of the
site.
In accordance with the review of impact concerns of land use,
' water, ecology, and existing environmental conditions the
Bayberry Estates residential subdivision plan (October 1989 ) has
been evaluated to have moderate to minor impact to these
' parameters. It is recommended that soil conditions be evaluated
and further assessed for suitable stormwater and sanitary
disposal practices , as required for Suffolk County Health
Department Approval, and a final determination of drinking water
availability be confirmed.
' 18
BAYBERRY ESTATES PHOTO LOG
PHOTO
NUMBER DESCRIPTION
L Bayberry Estates site looking north along Laurel
Avenue
2 Bayberry Estates site looking west from Laurel
Avenue
3 Bayberry Estates site looking south along Laurel
Avenue
4 Upland area looking northwest
' 5 Old field - potential hunting zone for avian
predators
' 6 Open space upland area
7 Upland - old field looking north
' g Upland area - note ground cover
t9 Upland area - note ground cover
10 LI:LCO Tower transects northeast to southwest
' 11 Typical upland plant
7.2 Wetland looking west
13 Wetland - possibly old irrigation pond
14 Probable deer lay area
15 Shrub swamp wetland
' 16 Scallops shells
17 Shrub swamp wetland
18 Typical wetland vegetation
' 19 Wetland - note uprooted tree
20 Wetlands
21 Wetlands - note abandoned drum
22 Wetland vegetation - food source
1
� f
r
ne
r. �t
I
I
a 1
I
1 i
r ,
0
.rw w ',
i-
I
.r)
� w f F 1 �,' ],� {i�' ••.sem • l^ 1... ..�nw� •
— !e( ,1 ,ice � � s •� /�j y ` � � �1Y�I � � 'c�'`',.s� _
4
•
� * •mow :3 `�
W " `�� • .�. '�, a .�" �+, r -'�,- � � .
` IK
5
, l ,
J' a
.Iii
Car-
h `� • y� Imo..• ,�F'
r y N- 04
I i
fs
��; ` �� , , -01 IL V �� _ ��.� � "moi •
}
• ii � .;Awl..."
� J
1,7
i f, •
/ � r _ � _.3 1._ _ � •` �- SIM.
. � T
APPENDIX A
EAF
EXVIR !PMAL A.M!".ENT - DART I
Pre 1-c• InMry Nan
NOTICE: This dedtm*set �• dettened to asit:t In daterseininq whether the action omoased "Y nave a slsrniflunt
_ effete on the "vdrt t. Please to fete the "tire Oats Sheat. Answers ID these auestlae+ .111 be casldered
U Oars Of the "011Ca91" for aearevAI And way Do Subject to further verlfl Catton And aabllC nriw. Prarido
any additional isferaatt" you belt,ve will be needed to coailatn PAATS 2 and 1.
It Is livened that eoanietian Of Lia EAF will be dao"dent an Infore,stton cum"tly availableand .111 net
imol" newatssdiei. researtl or inv"Cloati". If Infor,,Att" r"uirina such additional wort Is uneva Saa,a.
to tndl"t, and specify each instants.
1A7tE OF PDOJECT: NAIrE MM A000E13 OF OWNER (Tf nlfer.-e•s
Francis O'Malley
Laurel Avenue, Southold, New York `al
ACCOM AND RAME OF APCLICXVr:
Francis O' Malley c/o Donald Rettaliata ._.I
has i
285 West Main Street Esq. �� P1tonE: 589-2500
cr..cl
Savville, New York 11782
•, (S fatal t P1
OtSCt1PtT^-1 OF PWUECT: (Briefly describe type of oroJect or action) _
Realty Subdivision aT SZ), �/ 7 j /F C2 e3 1N7)0 /he,o7s • O,Tlvs/ �
t v/nI /e-90 2ONIN6 S V tt✓/L'• s/O/(.l �l i/L/ZL`S Z Et I TO M/f'f/V 7)1�/V
(PLEASE CCIIPLETE EACH MEST1011 - Indicate M.A. If nae aooll to) '- 9 /FC,'_iS C/
A. SITE OESCIIPTSOt1
(Physi Cel setting of overall PrsJ,Ct, bath dorelonArd and unde"icoed arae)
1 I. GAeeral Character of the land: roRorally U,ifom +Jac, Generally "a•" and relllna or irm-ular
1. Preterit land usew
- Uraan Industrial Ca. erciel rbabmoan�'C Pural _, F•inst/�1',�L
Agriculture - trier VAl'knl r• �A i7 A-n/nn%t�l i-h 1.?M �C-�
7
1. Total acreage Of aroJect arae: 50 teres.
Aooroaimto atnage: Prrserntly After Conaletion ►refevfly After cz vait Non
1 gledaar Or erushland 39 ,Cris 27. litre, Hater Surface Ana O urea at",
Forested 3 tern 3 acres Unvegatite! (rock,
1 A riculturaln acres n acres earth or fill) O—ser" 0 acres
Roads. buildings
Noland (Frrinrater Or And otrier oared
Tidal at ner Articles surfaces 0 lent Z
8 ,Q ac•-s
or F C.L.) 8 Acres _acres
1 Other (Indicate ty-t) O ores 9. �,-r•t L
a. •mat It ---10M.Ant salt vme(t) on nro!Kt site? 1(a VPrl (_0d]M _
1 S. a tT tier- n,arat, outcro]danal on=.nlrcc lit-, rrs X� yr ,
--at !t -P.atn :d bedne:' N/A — 70e t I'a •reel
i
1
y�S,/ 7
A. Aoorosimate oercentaga of proPa%ed cro)eet. site .Itn %laces: 0-10: IJdV Y.: 1P-IST �7 : IS: or �y
_ gnetar :.
1. Is project contiguous to, ar contain A buildtnn or sitt listed on the National Register of Mlstmrtc
- FlicHl - les A no
8. what is the dean to the .&ter table20 +bet /Z 7D 27 i 3' its PC-7z YoUV6, � Ye U"1'7
9. Oo hunting or fishing cocamunitles presently exist in no ;mint areal —res —L-Ma A-10o GzdDU,-,l
10. DoH oralact sits contain any %oeaies of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or
endanaerd - —Tag X .lo. According to - Identify tech species ''v9 .�'mn5 r"?2✓rrn H,QL'�7N-i
e,1, 71^-Fr- Fr2 : eje P1!CY 144PPIrn
11. Are nen any unique or unusual land toren an the Project site? (I.e. cjtffs, dunes. other geological AVO SF•rLr
fon&ecions - _yes X hd. (Describe
12. Is thePtvjpet sit. presently used by the coneunity or neighborhood as an poen spate or rxnatlais Cry` rJ "
AM �! TH � Mo. CyiDeYMCC- OF EX7Z7V:;1V, USC- :EY Cr 1L-b,'
17. Dom the oresent sits offer or include scenic views or vistas knees to be Nagartant to the cteeenityl IAJ
T
as ho
11. Stream within or contiguous to project treat -WQQQ- SM r4Ll- �7Y2 E�4M FtFL10 u.•�c71�r'pS %l�l.��
w• A. Mas of stnsse and hes of river to Mier it is tribuury NIA Cnosscm 5/77 FRaM _TCU 7)7-
777 A/C,.T/fWE 7-
IS. Was. Pends. Wtland am&s within or contiguous to Project ane-. -
a. Ilan N/A It. Sita (in acres) N/A
la. VIAU it the d"Hiiant land use and zoning elassiffestion within a 1/4 Pile radius of the Project (e.g.
' Single faolly nsldtnti Al. R-2) and the sole of develooment (e.g. 2 story).
/1-Ci/_'i CL( T-iJ?�'/��i 4!"7-/h-J_ ✓A LA}N 7-
a.
1. PROJECT DESCAIMCM
1. Physical dimensions and scale of sroject (fill in dimensions as sopropristal
a. Total contiguous acreage awned by project sponsor 50 aeras.
b. ►rojtct acreage develcoed: 0 acres Initially: 11 .9 acres ultistely. '
C. Project acreage to raisin undeveleoed '1R 1 .
it. Length of orojtet. in miles: N/A If atiamorlactl
e. If project is an expansion of Hinting, Indicate percent of expansion proposed: building scuan foot-
age N/A ; developed acreage N/A .
f. Muaner of off-%trent aiming spaces existino 0 propmed : 40
g. Maxieuh vehicular trios generated per hour 2.5 (noon completion of project) Ads 7YtAP5/f1
h. If residential: hummer and type of housing units: �r�/ / 67)
' ae Family Tun Faml l♦ Mui tlple Family condominium
Initial X
Ultimate X
I. If; Orientation
'•rlgn0a MOad-Clty-aegicnal Estimated Emoloyment
' Commercial
Industrial
J. •cul neiynt of tallest -ro'ased itr-ic Care !!L.
2. Non wcn natural agtertal ll.a. rocx, earth, ase.)
will be raioved /mr the Sita • 0 tons
0 auric yards.
2. Nor any acres of vegetation (treeshrubs,s, sbs, gmune Loversv
) will be reeved feta•. lite crus.
s
a. Will any acture famtt (aver I" years old) or other locally-iaeprtant vegetation be removed Dy t",
project! yes o
S. Are there any plans for m-vegatatlen to replace that removed during construction? Y yes
6. If single phase pmjtetz Anticioated period of construction 2Liionth2, (including dentllftienl.
T. If assitI-phased project: a. foul nurner of phases anticivatedll/A go.
• b. Anticipated data of evneneam hSt prate :Fal I month 19A7war (Includenq
danolition)
C. Approximate David lotion date final all,,, Fall •ontn1990 veer.
d. 11 phase 1 financially dependent: m subsaauent mases? _Yes _'vi N/
6. Will blasting occur during c:mtruction! _yo X Ile -
__ 1. Master of jobs generated: during.construction c_; after project is Loxolete 0 -
Ia. Rustler of jobs eliminated by this project 0 -
11. W11 Dmjett i•eduim relocation of any projects or facilities! yes Y np. If yn. uolaen: -
12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disooasl lanilved2 X Yes _40.
b. Ifyea. indicate type of waste (sawe".- Industrial, etc.) Sewace
c. If surface disposal name of Strom into which effluent will ba discnarged [)/A .-
17. Will surface area of existing IakesX ponds., Ismaat, bays or other surfs" watera:Ays be Increased or
decreased by proposal! --Yes —.o.
la. Is project or any portion of project located 1n the 100 year flood plain! -Y" -L—yo
15. a. Does project Involve disposal of solid waste? -L—Yes —No
' b. If yes. will an existing solid waste disnosal facility be used? X yes
C. If yes, give name: T/0 Southold : location Cutchoatie
d. 9111 any %sites not go Into A savage dtsrosal Systase or into a sanitary landfill? _Yes 40
16. WIII project use herbicides or prsticides? X Yes —4a Lawns
' 17. Will project routinely produce Dears (nom than one hour per day)? _ les Y 10
mo - —
16. Will project produce operating nails exceeding the local aienea noise levels? . les X vo
19. 4111 project result in an Increase In energy usa? X Yes _". If Yes, Indicate t7ws)
v-2�C'yt/c:, C'.fs riL w+ TY? /7 /X
� r-
20. If water suooly Is fron wells Indicate pumoinq capacity N/A gals/m,nute.
11 "
21. weal chit el hated water6000 usage per day -__ dols/da r. /" - P,Q
22. Zoning: A. What is doninant zoning classification of site? A - Resident.lal /Aclrlrllltl,yo
b. Current Soeciflt zoninq classfftcacion of site rills
C. !s omaosed ase co-s ncrn- ..itn nrr3mt toni..c! Yns
d. If n0. Indicate desires
i
i
1
26. ADo"vali: a. Is any Federal parelt reoulredT _ Yes �Mo
0. Dots project Involve State or Federal funding or ftnancingl _ Yai X Md
c. local and Regional norovels:
Approval Reouirvd Submittal Aooroval
(Yes. no) (Typt) (Oats) (Oats)
City. Toon. Village Board PS cllfst.pr
City. Town. V11199t planning Board 5 U t 1 V 1 5},x[1
_ City. To . Zoning Board �T17S—
city. County Health Otoartant 75; ) u
e
Other-local agencies
Other regional agencies -7r7 l— FLJH111 19 COFW1- — .—
State Agencies NO
Federal Agencies 17Cf
C. IRFORK1itORAL DETAIL
Attach any additional information as�my be needed to clarify your project. If *dery are or may be any
advent latucta assuclated with the proposal, please discuss such leoacts and the measures vlrtch can be
Ulm to mitigate or avoid (q�+�-m. 't}e
iRVAREVS SIGRATURE: "' h'e '" // � ,I
TITLE: LK)'AO 5 f/2 E�a2
REPRLSEXTIR6: 417 4- 4-L6:'L/ .S C//�j/J/ 5 V IU
GTL:
I
1
A.
V.
I ``
YOUNG lt� YGUNC
400 OSTRANDER AVENUE
RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 1196,
- 616-727-2963
ALDEN W. YOUNG FAX 316-727-0144
P.l....o.e1 [�md Sun..ya
HOWARD W.YOUNG
Bayberry Estates
Southold
Town of Southold
(Francis O'Malley)
Cluster Subdivision
Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form
August 1, 1990
Part 1 Item A 8
The elevation of groundwater is approximately 3 feet above mean sea
level and since the ground elevations vary from elevation 15 to
elevation 31, the depth of groundwater ranges from 12 feet to 27 feet.
Perched water exists on the site at elevation 16. 5 more or less.
' Part 1 Item A 4
Although the predominant Soil Type is haven Loam, a list of all -.oil
Types are as follows:
HaB Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
HaA Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
PmB 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes , eroded
PmC 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded
Ca Canadice silt loam
r• y
2 3
Small to Potential Can Impae
IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated
- 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Ch.
(Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conserat'on Law, ECL)
X10
OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2 /
• Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes L
• Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a Cl ❑ Dyes I
_ protected stream.
• Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes L
• Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ O ❑Yes L
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes L
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected exist i r new body
g
of water? �10 OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
— • A 106 increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water O ❑ ❑Yes I
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
• Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes f
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I
S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? ONO AYES
Examples that would apply tq column 2
• Proposed Action will require a discharge permit ❑ O ❑./Yes
• Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ yes
have approval to serve proposed(project) action. /YvST ;3C- c D ,� wc,-,o Ayes
• Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
gallons per minute pumping tapacity.
1 • Construction of operation causing any contamination of a water C1 O []Yes
supply system.
• Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ Dyes
• Liquid effluent will be conveyec:off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
• Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
day.
• Proposed Action will likel- caose siltation or other discharge into an ❑ O ❑Yes
existing body of water to the»:tent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
• Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
• Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water O ❑ ❑Yes
and/or sewer services.
• Proposed Action locates commercial andlor industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
• Other impacts:—a!% ❑ XYes
J . Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoff? ONO OYES
Ess:nples that would apply to column 2
0 Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
a a
Small to Potential Can Impact
Moderate Large Mitigated
Impact Impact Project Cha,
• Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑.
• Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑,
• Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑
•. Other impacts: m-1i- ❑ ❑Yes ❑
r
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? .FINO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑
four.
• Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑
refuse per hour.
• Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes n
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes L
_ to industrial use.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ Oyes f
development within existing industrial areas.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
e. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? ONO AYES
Examples that mould apply to column 2
' • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes f
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
• Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ Dyes I
• Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I
than for agricultural purposes.
• Other impacts: 577!- S�"027-2 2-4P-rV.2s c r nrrr,- ❑ 9Yes 1
vP1tf/3i 0i= «'rZi iZ
CcLti"c
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threakened or
non-endangered species? O ❑YE5
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
• Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
' vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?.
ONO AYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ [--)Yes f
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
8
1 2 3
small to Potential Can Impact "
Moderate Large Mitigated B-t
Impact Impact Project Cham
• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N
agricultural land.
• The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑Yes /
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District. more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
• The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON
land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑t-
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCE
11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resoui sl O OYES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Sec ion 617.21,
Appendix B.)
' Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C3?
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
manmade or natural.
• Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 01-
aesthetic
?aesthetic resources which will eliminate or signtficandy reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑,
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure oistoric. pre-
historic or paleontological importance) NO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
• Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑
' project site.
• Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑
' IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NOYES
( )The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportun ❑ ❑ Yes ❑
yr ,
'=mer rection of an open space important to the community. ❑ Yes ❑
• Other impacts: 0 ❑ Yes ❑
1 2 3
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Imp&
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation sy'stems? Moderate Urge Mltlgatet
(ANO OYES Impact Impact Project Ct
Examples that would apply to column 2
e Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ Dyes
• Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
e Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the communitys so rcrc5r of fuel or
energy supply? ZPKJ�O OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
e Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of 11 ❑ ❑Yes
any form of energy in the municipality.
e Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ Dyes
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
e Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibra4'ofy as a result
of the Proposed Action? [ANO OYES"'
' Examples that would apply to column 2 / \\
e Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ Dyes
facility.
' e Odors will occur routinely (move than one hour per day1 _ - ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
e Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local 0 ❑ Dyes
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
e Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ Dyes
noise screen.
e Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safeV?/
IMNO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
e Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
substances(i.e.oil,pesticides,chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of
' accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
e Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ Dyes
' form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating.
infectious, etc.)
e Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
gas or other flammable liquids.
e Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ Oyes
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste. _ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
0 Other impacts:
Im2p: 23
IMPACT ON GROWTH ANO CHARACTER llto Potential Can Impact
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD ate Large Mitigated E
to Will proposed action affect thecharacterof theexisting jommunity? et Impact Project Chat
TaTNO DYES --
Examples that would apply to column 2 �
• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes CD
project is located is likely to grow by more than S%.
• The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C3
will increase by more than S% per Year as a result of this project.
• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑
• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes
• Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ Cl ❑Yes L
or areas of historic importance to the community.
• Development will create a demand for additional community services Cl El ❑Yes
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
• Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ 13 ❑Yes L
• Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I
❑ ❑ Oyes I
t • Other impacts:
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? x170 OYES
1 If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s)
mitigated.
' Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1 . Briefly describe the impact
2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project ci
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
t To answer the question of importance, consider:
• The probability of the impact occurring
• The duration of the impact
• Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
' • Whether the impact can or will be controlled
• The regional consequence of the impact
• its potential divergence from local needs and goals
' • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Q
SCOTT L HARRIS
' Bennett Orlowski. Jr_ Chairman x+�4A ^� Sunerc nor
Grorcc Ritchie Latham. Jr. >y�o :5y
Richard G. Ward -- �_ -Lown Hall. "(0i %lain R,
dark S. McDonald ���yr� P O- Bov 1179
Kenneth L. Edwards .Southold. Ne-.i 1'(,rk 119-
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
lelenhonc 15161 765-1918 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax 1516i _65-1823
March 8 , 1991 �_ R"'� rT-)
Donald A. Rettaliata
Attorney At Law
285 West Main Street APR
P .O. Box 493
River-head, New York 11901
ct,u MARS. 5LOANE & CCNLON
' RE: Proposed Major Subdivision
Bayberry Estates
SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 , 36
1000-56-1-1
Dear Mr . Rettaliata:
The Board has received their environmental consultant ' s
review of the above mentioned subdivision. A copy of the report
is enclosed.
' The Board would like you to complete Part III of the Long
Environmental Assessment Form.
iThe consultant has suggested that access to Lot 11 be via a
private drive, so as to avoid the construction of the cul-de-sac
' for one house. Although the lot/road configuration may be
revised after review of the Part III , you are still required to
provide a tap road to the land now or formally of Edwin Mooney.
Upon submission of the Long EAF Part III , it will be
forwarded to the consultant for a cost estimate for the review.
Payment must be submitted by your client before the Planning
Board will authorize the review.
Please contact this office if you have any questions
regarding the above.
Very truly yours ,
Bennett Orlowski , Jr. � ,m5
Chairman
Encl .
CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES
' ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS y,rJ
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. February 15, 1991
Chairman
Southold Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Bavberry Estates
SCI-JAW 1000-55-6-35 & 36
t1000-56-1-1
Dear Benny:
As per the your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above
referenced project In accordance with our correspondence of October 11, 1990. Tasks and
completed activities are identified as follows:
1. Review Part I LEAF
The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and
' amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached.
2. Prepare Part 1I LEAF
The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional
information concerning our findings is included below.
3. Advise as Necessary
' The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and
area have been consulted. Overall, we find this parcel to be extremely sensitive due
to the presence of an extensive perched wetland system, and significant use of the site
by area wildlife. We fully support the use of clustering as a means of reducing
potential environmental impacts to these resources. Due to the extreme sensitivity of
this parcel, we feel that the Board would benefit through the preparation of a Ling
EAF Part III narrative discussing the existing environmental setting, the potential
impacts of the project, and mitigation either presently reflected in the cluster plan, or
additional means which could be employed to reduce environmental impacts. The
Long EAF Part III would constitute additional information needed by the decision-
king
agency un support of the Determination of Significance, which the Planning
Board is required to issue. The Long EAF Part III narrative could either be prepared
by a consultant retained by the applicant, in which case the information presented
should be reviewed by the Board (and/or consultant) for accuracv, or we would be
pleased to prepare the narrative.
' The following is a brief synopsis of the basis for our findings:
Environmenutl Resources
The subject parcel is 50.0171 acres in size, and contains an area of freshwater
wetlands as designated by the NYSDEC on 6-1-89, and reflected on project maps prepared
Page I "1 4
54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 IS161 331 14�5
Bavberry Estates
Long EAF Review
by Young & Young. 'he wetlands location has been reviewed by the Town of Southold
Trustees, and is found to be accurate. Accordingly, if activity is located beyond 75 feet from
these wetlands, the Trustees have no further jurisdiction. Nevertheless, the Planning Board
is obligated to consider impacts upon the integrity and use of these wetlands and associated
Wildlife resources, as a result of increase in intensity of use in adjacent areas, and other
potential impacts.
The subject we¢lands are identified as Palustrine wetlands, forested in Broad-leaved
' deciduous plants, and Seasonally Saturated, as indicated in the National Wetlands Inventory.
This classification is accurate with the exception of areas dominated by emergent vegetation
within areas containing; standing water. The wetlands support a significant amount of
wildlife activity.
The soils map was reviewed for information pertaining to the existence of these
wetlands. Young & Young accurately identify the soils on site in the LEAF addendum. The
wetlands is underlain with Canadice silt loam, which retains significant moisture. The soil
survey also indicates that there are several intermittent streams associated with these
wetlands. Intermittent streams are located within the wetlands and in areas below 20 foot
elevation in the western and north central area of the site. T}tese areas are identified as "not
crossable without tillage" and "unclassified". Inspection of the area surrounding the site,
finds existing stream crossings in the vicinity of the intersection re laurel Avenue and Iv,
' Road (south of the site), and across Yennecott Drive, north ain
of the site. The presence of
flowing surface water streams north and south of the site, coupled with the poorly drained
soils and intermittent streams identified in the Soil Survey on the site itself, strongly suggests
a perched stream or some fairly extensive perched water condition, beyond the limits of
designated wetlands depicted on the map. Accordingly this should be considered in the
context of site use.
iThe site also contains significant avian species, mammals and herptiles. in
conjunction with wetland and overgrown field habitat. Great Blue Heron and raptors were
identified in association with the wetland and adjacent areas. Common winter-resident
I avifauna were identified, as well as activities associated with fox, rabbit and deer. A high
concentration of"gun shells" suggests an abundance of game on the site.
The topography of the site is irregular; however, few areas contain steep slopes which
pose a constraint. One area which should be given consideration is the depression to the
southwest corner of the site (south of the isolated wetlands), which has slopes of up to 22
percent.
Potential Impacts
The yield plan appears to be feasible, and provides a basis for eighteen (18) clustered
lots. The "cluster' plan is effective in preserving the entire wetlands and a 100 foot wetlands
buffer. Further, there is significant upland open space buffer associated with the "cluster"
plan, which we feel is essential.
Potential impacts are substantially mitigated under the "cluster' plan through the
preservation of 33.9 acres of land, or 68 percent of the site. We believe that the extreme
sensitivity of this parcel as identified above warrants this subdivision concept. Given the
CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES
ENVIRONMENTAL,,AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 2 A 4
\)/r1A,
4 t
Haybem Estates
Long EAF Review
sensitivity of the site, the obligation of the Planning Board to take a "hard look" at the
t implications of a decision, and several issues raised above, we feel that the Board would
benefit from the preparation of a LEAF Part III narrative.
' The following is an outline of issues which should be discussed. In addition,
recommendations for preparation of documentation and possible design changes and
mitigation is also included:
' IMPACTS LAND
Construction on slopes of 15% orgreater
South recharge area should be strongly considered for a natural recharge basin. The
' temporary cul-de-sac encroaches on depression which could be used for natural
recharge. Natural recharge concept and feasibility should be determined.
Consideration could be given to accessing Lot 11 by private drive, in order to avoid
' constructing additional cul-de-sac for one house.
Construction in an area containing intermittent stream and poor soils
Perched stream conditions may be present in area of south recharge basin and Lot 11.
Sanitary system functioning and hydrologic impacts should be considered. Test holes
and/or lot relocation should be considered.
' IMPACT ON WATER
Action requires we of a water source currently experiencing supply limitations
Action appears to be within or near the franchise area of the Greenport Water
' District. Water availability from this source should be determined.
Suitability of soils and subsoils for sanitary wastes
Soil leaching limitations should be considered in the context of potential ground,
' surface and/or perched water impacts.
Impact to intermittent stream and wetlands
' Use of southwest corner of site should be considered in the context of impacting
natural drainage characteristics.
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
Site supports raptors, heron, deer and herptiles, potential threatened species and species
of special concern
Habitats and wildlife should be characterized as support for maximum preservation
of open space through clustering.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
' Proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land
Agricultural suitability of site, land use compatibility of agriculture and availability of
alternate agricultural land should be considered.
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
Potential reduction of open space
Site open space resource and character should be identified as support for maximum
' preservation of open space through clustering.
CRAMER. VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES
ENVIRONMENTAL AND. PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page oro
ma/ m
Bayberry Estates
Long EAF Review
I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to continue review
of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do
not hesitate to call if you have any questions.
Very t //y �/
(�-' r' LLT��JLc_
' arles J. Voorhis
enc: Part I/II LEAF
t
CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES
ENVIRONMENTALAND::PLAdNING CONSULTANTS Page 4 of 4
' 8.0 LIST OF REFERENCES
' Wetlands, Audubon Society, by William A. Niering, Pub. Alfred A.
Knopf Inc. , Chanticleer Press Inc. NY, September 1989
Field Guide to North American Wildflower, Audubon Society, by
Niering & Olmstead, Pub. Alfred A. Knopf Inc. NY,
Chanticleer Press Inc. NY, January 1988
' Field Guide to Norah American Trees, Eastern Region, Audubon
Society, by Little, E.L. , Pub. Alfred A. Knopf Inc. NY,
Chanticleer Press, NY, October 1988
1 Soil Survey of Suffolk County, NY, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington DC,
1970
Munsell Soil Color Charts, Kollmorgen Instruments Corp. ,
Kollmorgen Inc. , Baltimore, MD, 1990
Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional
Wetland, by Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland
' Delineation, (USACOE, USEPA, USF&W, USDA Soil Conservation
Service) Washington DC, 1989
National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northeast
' Region, by P.B. Reed, gr. US Fish & Wildlife Service, 1988
List of Protected Plants - NYS Department of Environmental
1 Conservation, Albany, NY
List of Protected Wildlife Species, NYSDEC Albany, NY
Preliminary Freshwater Wetland Map, NYSDEC Region I , Stony Brook,
NY
' The Field Guide to Wildlife Habitats of Eastern United States, by
Janine Benyus
' Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering, by Cook, Magraw
Hill, 1990
Standards for Sewage Disposal Systems, Suffolk County Department
of Health Services, Riverhead, NY, 1984
t
270
� x
N
`\ A°
31.0 Dp 4
X
Lot 39 . 30\ -- 4
Lot 40 -__
459.66 w
OR\� N.8493E 30 E.
I 33.5
YENNEOOTT I z N33.0
\ LO o
I s \\ \ w0CP 17 P E N O SITE
I I Filed No. 5187 I \ . $ o_ r \
Suff. Go. \ •Lot 41 �_
Yennecott Park Lot 42\\ I � p p G E V6
Subdivision- I I /Lot
4z1`. `11
now or formerly Loi 45 I / \ 112363
Lot 46 I.
park
Yennecott A560
property wners
prof O 28.5 /
/✓ N.83°42 OOr E. 24.5 --*-
\
r i 1 1
10
/ � 1 5 \ \ 20.5 ♦\ I \ .,
-
Oo + 6 ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE
Lot 47 .c 142aP� -
CID
56000*5.F `\ 2ro�\ 2s, , - PO N
\ , r 00±r,,F \\ bo \v i \ LOCATION MAP
/ 150 N 2 U4 /tJO lI I SCALE: I° = 600'
` �. \26.0 p
U_ as
/ 1 N , / v
19
I^\\\♦ 23°..\ / 145
a
now or formerly
Richard H. 9 Loureen E. Wheeler w s \
W. —
O_ \
IIII \
oI 0 11 \
\� 1 x \
' '— _ --_— -``•2 / /� 19.5 — _ \ \\Ds O 1\ 11 � 17 1 0 /�
LO 1
I ( 1 I 1 29.0
y
A'\000
" \\ o 1
0 j
I
245
' J
30.5
I 4 / \ \ \ + q0 \\ `\
\ 41000r- 5.F. OO
\ I I m \ 1 O + $F 34.0 \�j \ -
572.83 I \
w S.88°5730°W. 1
N
40000 4 SI.Q 11
Up
_ N
1Wr
m_"
21.0\tel - i / \ S.F \\ \ \
now or formerly Florence Moffat l+ 010 240, I ` •
\
� / \64
Z
°
C--
110 Io \ \ 0 4p0 \ 1
0 0
i \ lus ♦ \ O OSe \ 1
\I
F I\ I
\ I
o P
19 0 1 '
Y' h 12 Pie f GLUcOTER
vvA r ,wm 1I 4/000
•
NN" SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN
\ \ p SF 1 1
PREPARED FOR
OR
{ A ; \\\ N FRANCIS 0 MALLEY
O \. 270
AT SOUTHOLD
I A3O two `S.q 11 w I II
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SITE DATA s�
NOTES' I 22.5 O I
I. SUFFOLK CO. TAX MAP I Total Area = 50 Ac.+- I 10 I / \ 2 SUFFOLK C O U N T Y , N . Y
DIST. 1000 SECT. 055 BLD-6 LOT 035 B03G 2 Zoning Use DI'strict - A-Residential Agricultural I / g08 5
DIST. 1000 SECT. 056 8L 01 LOT 01 / \— N
3 Total No. Lots = 20 O , s `°
2. TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON IS FROM 1{\B<\y --
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP-FIVE EASTERN TOWNS' 4. Length of Road = 1990tFT. or {a< Moo\\eyl i RO °'w_ 4�tE oR "�w
PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. / �,
nov' Pnn 1 i / RP\L o' ��`° w• ro�rr
OF PUBLIC WORKS 1<\G\a 1 ma \
O
r°
u mY su{Ym f n 1b1A1NF •t'
on or>M raw rarN 191N , , \ ` O `i0F• °. 4599"
'r.e wm uWYk9°Ws NNY Yu wuagp r
.wa,sy aw sxnu xm p0ya� \ I I
FA
LAND 100y
/ Oo520 \ r
YOUNG & YOUNG
„.x+uree.wak+ro xmoN wys ay \\ I1 DATE : JAN 24,1986 400 OSTRANDER AVE , RIVERHEAD ,N.Y.
m.ra Yxe pnSaN Nb WINIa ro■aM
..om, rasp ox xa a•rnrr ro wN \
SCALE ! 1 = 100 0. ALDEN W. YOUNG,N.Y S. P.
NO 85-1482- E. a L.S. LIC. NO. 12845
**�.:w.msunaN wro Nrnnw.sNp I-/
TM'" •w�xeNaasra rNw.aa NarN HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.B. L.S.LIC. N0. 45893
't"'Y r�,,,a...w,4 ur r�r n•xswsna.
50038
'70
Ix
N
31.,0
Lot 39
i\ m -- ^4
Lot 40 '°,
459.86
OQ.\� N,64°3830 E rr
I33.5V—
YENNECOTT I z V
\ I O 330
(
x
I W
\ O N °
Suff. Co. Filed No. 5187 I \ `\ $o 0
" Yennecott ParV� Lot 42`\ \Lot 41 £ gp000 s y F
Subdivision- I Lot 43 I 0- SITE
I ,L'ot m
now or formerly I Lot 45 I 1 "aO
Lot 46
Yennecott Park I / 1123.63��
PrOPerty
Owners Asso
. I \
/ x r /
_ \
/ N.8304200�;E. za.5 \\ �r i —�\ °. '1�\ J�\r
20.5
Lot 47
O¢ \ _
O � \ 1/ I o ° \\ \\ m \\ a^17 -hF r 1 LIL CO ELECTRIC —�
m 0! 1\ 1 O i/ m 80000 - 80000 910 \) \ MISSION LINE
TRANS
1 + S.F. - 5.F \ `2
83000 '-'S.F ° s, , .83000 *+- `' F' II
"0
26,0
LOCATION MAP
\�\ I 3mOo ROAD \ 2es' 260 \ SCALE' I' = 600' -
\ I 8
r5 \
i N
now or formerly
Richard H. 9 Loureen °
E. Wheeler W . 1
W . l \\ ,I o• / -1 - N'�G f \ \ `41
p I Po \ \ O
• \ I i .-- - 'y \ \ 5 -----_ — O� 630 \ -
+ e.F ' illlL
111000 - �pO 10
92000 ` 6.F. 36.0 11 11
PARK
1 `\
11 ( \ I 1 29.0 \� \\ • PON 1 \\ F,=+••"� \ \ 10 11 LO 1
\ v vI fV° EGREATION10
o AREA
\ r \ 1
01
O
11
` 1 /
�111\I��L y
\ \ \ \ \
\ \ 1 I N D 30.5 r
S.88°57'30°W. 572.83 3a.o \ / x \
\
` N
o
.M 11 1 82040
now or formerly Florence Moffat 01 y' 21,
0
10
A /
\
00000 9 F.
55 r� 8000°
8,20170
1 C
IW \ \2 1 I5 1
1 A \ Q�
160 t9 I
/ � \\ 19.0
\ I I
1
Za5 1 1 000"y FCl
0 TAN DA K D c�0cl n\ -
0 � � t
Bey SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN
F.
\\ ao, o0 118\p00+ y t\\ 1 \ •.1
3p6 PREPARED FOR
92°00 '^\
27. I9 I FRANCIS 0 MALLEY
/ 1 \\ 16 r I m I 1 //
1 W 1 -
N1.O SUFFOLK CO. TAX MAP '
ES SITE DATA 11 16 r j11 I AT S O U T H O L D
Total Area = 50Ac.- I O `, rTOWN OF SOUTHOLD '
DIST. loo° SECT. 055 BL Q.9 LOT 035 B 036 22.5 ,
DIST. 1000 SECT. 056 BL 01 LOT 01 2. Zoning Use District - A-Residential Agricultural �' j 17 i \` �'� 5
2. TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREON IS FROM 3. Total No. Lots = 9 I I 8082
SUFFOLK COUNTY N . Y
TOPOGRAPHIC PREPARED FOR THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT AP-FIVE EASTERN TOWNS" 4. Length of Road = 2030* FT. gord`erloney I __ '/ () (`n
OF PUBLIC WORKS O< M° 1 1 + 6 F' / ' C\ b'°
0\-W
n°��o Pnn I a0pp0 i PA- w
p 196
.rRRR.rrn»R°..ran°. 1\ 1 �.a \\ / Std E O keV
`
P° R o_ MP� 3 r° ° w. �° °+f
1 S \
PNS
r° ma euRm 0 A wa�rou ar �tm �
:[Copy Rrr h W raw ont
:oRw r an SIaVlr rut NOR nwxRR: / \ O�/
Mu lWll YVYAYOR'S IIS YH p 1 / \ v \
InViS`Ip qN yWl np1![°NY'aal
,o n n vun rba carr. 1\ // �lj'VI. � 1 46693
�uo�nnriorox wwRR m R1FR '
S70°52 \ 1O lexo sua+EyO,
,cnmrrW. oWllYwwxu
Awl Oyu •' 1
nunnmwR n \ 1 YOUNG B YOUNG
.uwx oar w m ww.c Aen.
mYu,„ cv..�Rrm,rR Rqr ner4RRuw DATEJ - 04 , 1986 40005TRANDER AVE., RIVERHEAD N.Y
SCALE : 1”- 100' ��11 ALDEN W YOUNG,N.Y.S. P.E. BLS. LIC. NO. 12845
' 'nan,w,nammq,n nRs�Raur. . NO 85-1482-A HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y. S. L,S LIC. NO. 45693
50038
1
I
LEGEND
b������ PAVED ROAD
o�J SPOT ELEVATION + 29. 38
O
\ Lot 39 ar° CONTOURS - ----32-----
Lot 40 To N
WOODED AREA
OR��E 1 Ng4°38L30 E. MARSH �1D_ _ 41
25.39' / LONB SERVER
TRIB. AREA BOUNDARY -- -� --- 11
Y ENNECOTTo ED
AN 28 -is 9 ,m11 N �o
I" , Suff Co. File No. 5187 O
I cost Park I ° N
"Yenne Lot 41 f
SU 11' I Lot 42 z7 22' l aED
Lot 44 Wt 43 I 25 60' P P. G j;� 1\ pNp; �! ,-
I Lot 45 I i \ m m II1�11 j
I Lo146 1123.631 I ''I 1129 e3• N, N Y ��
playground1• O.D.NO. g ;
.. I yTA. 11.72
Parkzzz--- \ 11
TIC- 21.00 1 _
�N.8 4200 E ! 1 ',--�`y \, ,I' � N LE.a 1750 1 27 IB ' _•2B '
D5� `�_� 25.90'
�- _
16.159' 36. 1`I�--� ` /E ,2s'11a•�-� 26__ _ EASEMENT °rw i° I
17 a3' .I�2'
PDAo
-�-1- 15.29' 21.00 '\ 1 -. �- �� - P
'1
1 ffi ` \\• 1 .`� 1 GOO _.` -� ♦ N 1•J
39' I 37 56'
17 5E '
19.4x. \ \ pi c' Y r, .22_5' , `, zq , --� - s -�LILCO ELECTRI
'i 1] .a0' \ 910 ± 'D.F. e I 90' Bx. • :oa ._-..__ - _��' N ��- C RANS i
1a o 00 IeA I aFl gc,OP a 1 W =15910N LINE
17 .6U' �, B O.6,00%
W ' I 1 .78' 38.89+ 2 �+ p 4\3 \♦ ABg 2 33•
Lot 47 io 1p m \ ;� I P S`SOOO +.ojF , ° e20 P
p U, - yL 7 'GRIT cHAM BER PO _ s M I
LLT \ f O 1. .02 12?S;2-BL°DIA` o \'1 9p IN t
1 q 4.R's f
- 17 7.- 19.Jb' •�• �2'�.J]' `� 1 2 `J9' - 20
_ - ' '122:74• _ .-' + I I RF 6 A a 1 A P I_
�7.q3' \ III 1 .96' SB c��. 1e.10' N \ zsdop 2418 M39 5 T A°j 076 A o pe A8 G1 O Oh REN. Is.7o•
1 02' N .' \ / 9L ,1 \ r98_ �•. 0 0. 43% P / ,V�.�1" \ R,1' ♦_ S' R'r\ \ 11 1 N 1N W E-
0
41' _ V
TO
- _ - _
I ED
now or formerly ------------� - _
ifi 7' \ 20.96' - ° - -
`3 �/ems
Richard H. Wheeler 81 19."27 ' R 2$ 03' , -119 - // SCALE =fi00
9 5 '' /HQ I9 '" � ' Jy/ � � LOCATION MAP
Loureen E. Wheeler N .69 - - - 1F , a1 ' , 16 73� ... 50 " 2� / 1 �,U a� pROp��s 0
W ' 16.62' 1bYs1-_ 21 .4 .� Q _�_{�L\ __ _ __ _
7J 1
'o .4 %`\ LINE OF WETLAN DLJ U,.
\ 1 ,I / 18.01 ' 1124+ 5 ? o0K/ \9•P� a A 18
231731 '.. \2,024`.-+ ' Ili. ]9' �` 2 .8 �O 433 �].3%^ ` pet,, INIS SITE DATA
` 3a.4ei o r 2 ADO ' M1B 1 m N �, S O
1 1 56. \ 1 _ a• ° „1 ,m to
A . 46' ,TE JT HOLE N0.1 `. ` e lP'1 ' O
69' -
G / - /' \ \ 2�O e• a gyp ' TOTAL AREA = 50.017,1 ACRES
9.79 1A.'I fi.fi0\ / 97'0 241,, E711 a' " �L //��11y Z� 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT = A- RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL
SIL ffi SJ .04' ��ii'' 7r-
19.
3. NO. OF LOTS = 20
6 ss OPEN CO PAGE =6 , I'\ +', 2 � '+ (1 `9 5fi' \ a, �y 17 -%A
4. LENGTH OF ROAD = 1910*- FT.
� 31 . 1 ' _ \, ,� N '^I`. 27t
ACRES w ' O �o G o 0 5. AREA OF OPEN SPACE = 27_AGRES
/ \ + - 6. PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE = 54%
;420001 Co.F. °3 , A° 1
23. 13 �25. 8' 1\/ RA s- �� �O &R OOM.PC�060% N
20 20 ' YL I',I i 3d sfi i slid °
30.25• 2 � 16' 1
16.82 .` x '1664'`, +c =I ID A ' li i 52OaI - UJ.F. �ALREA '', '•1a O.B NO.g �6.N0.2
- m I1� STA.5106 EDTA.0+96 T
19.65 W it 1 �Sj39' , 2 14+ •G.6.N04 3 011 IE.T29.86T'80 N N FILE N0, 13'a3-t.1I'-
OTA 0+
572.831 ' 3 1 1 N �i AOT T. 2T.31 a 9Q �43oo ,F " ° SUFFOLK CO. PLANNING DEPT
5.88 571S011W. y 1 ���..//// s f+ N
\ '1� 1 , � Q211.60• - III ,�•�, IE.� 23.N1
\� NW L I'
17 16' '-'�-
16 t I
o
19 79' - 4 TEST HOLri /
�v\
��- Nom• 1 19'M BY T D �
° �'� • 0 3 2N.5o TRI D. 1° S BIREVIEW SECTION
�"IK \ pREA �/ ^y
\ °LL I �` + } 65 ,�� ,� 40 e \ 2270 i KL°.2 N 0 15 B.G O.M.P 0 0.4000 ��T G.� ,
19 45' 1 7� 'I , 31 .0 3 .1.27.1 \moo. L m�OF
£ 0 1� 460 600 %j y »'
IE.5b' t), 22 72'r'. 2 2y p.PJ.NQ+ti�T2
\ SIL / '--' s /' \ TA� 2 This Proposed
/20, 16' • S0 \ /'\�W c.D.NO.6 �m I TR"E' .27.83 AcIII;- 422 P P sed plat is not within
`F `( AV' 1L�, AREAthe jurisdiction of the Suffolk County
19. 17' 8 3 \ / '„_- 1 ` 4c 1 1., 7 l OTA.3+00 Q P75 OF IB D.OGMP
/ _ Tc.=24.74 9 0 "IO.0 a9s°/, Na.l m
20.94' SS' LE= 2107 / 1Planning Commission.
2ij�fi2'„ `\n
now or formerly Herbert R Mandel - - - `6 �O�„yt oo• .-„ 1, -r/\ m02b. 10`, , ���I O -
2o a6' p'h O 21 .Gb• `� 1 / 24.0 :,p`• 2 0§50 DE
k b �4P 14a.
y. ,tcb oo OP 0' c�0 I o � I 1 > N t*1
20 E5, 2 ,23 1 ,1` /� _ b5' V 11 /25.94 _ . R° _ \ 26 CJ,.I I 000 t
N}°10 \tel'
/25.79 \ a2_
°• ` `� 1 \I 2 OTA.3+00 x N
\ 4.OS Op T.O,=24,94 I'1J °`I\
` X. 1I` I „ LE.'E1.7 -•C 24,67
i 23.39• 4' 24, 6 \\ \`.; O 1`\SIN 76.1 III III SEE by,-
0. as'or 15°D.00. J•
% 1111 ° I \ � �,,0 B2 r .3 p /,I @0.600% /
` ' 'y B� \ PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP
6 ,
A2 `III Illi' S `1 111 �,�Y?S.G�Ao-1� y `D2� YO2,E �`
24 77'\24. 1
m o£
2E,59','. 111,II ,za 9h// \ ,✓ PREPARED FOR
TEOT HOLE MO. ! TENT HOLE NO.S Il Ile; 1 ` 12 .In
NOTE. O.o Oo ' III I` / ' A0' O.�D��6,0Z RO e, 25.37'
I. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP `I d ` r R 00 I > iT' N FRANCIS O � MALLEY
DK.BROWN DK.BROWN .N `
1000 055 26 035 a03fi O Q 27.69 1 v , 01A L+„ 5. `, 23 2a e D �
DIST. 1000 LOT LOAM LOAM 1
1000 056 01 01 0.8 1.l' O 0B A - •I'�
DIST 1000 BL.- LOT _ 7 14. 1 U AK
DROWN L° N� ' I _� i�„ •21.iN ,•
OILTY DROWN .� \I-�¢ P'°� I , ,. BR,'. ,�1� ` \ '` I 23.37' ---- AT SOUTHOLD
,•2 METALPPIpE,ICATES BITUMINOUS COATED CORRUGATED c0AN0 24 'NANO 2 2 GR` �2 °L 25 24 12 '� cd • Z I I �,• \ ! \
RED/BROWN REO/DROWN GR�' `, ° ���/ \ 23. t3-
3 PIPES CONNECTING LEACHING POOLS ARE IS" DIAMETER. 601 OOARgk <2 1, �r 9I 00 21.25'\ 3 - VUILDING ENVELOPE (TYP) / TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
0 \/
4 ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED mANv OANO @ 0a° ,Lp1' go ,o- O
TO M.S.L.(N.G.Y.D - 1929) 3.2' 9.4 O,N,P 'O tiry TRIB'gA 'I 66' ` e 24 a0'
DROWH/6RY GREYISH OD,G 2'd' C`.� I\ •RSA` i _
,5 23.33• ,. SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y
CLAY BROWN 1 OF 21 .89' �, o - �/
CLAY \B 5•. `I ` `` a 2'
DANDY (WATERI CA 1O \ I I `O � YN^6
CRY/BROWN ID 19. 01
CLAY 4.8 CLAY D \ OO 20.9 - D 2�1?2' 21.7,6' � JE OF N#11,
DROWN1e3.0+3• A..G•,.•'' 0
OA ESE mANOY O 9 O P / (p�O P,O
wI SANG CLAY O 20.35' a y1 ' .4 •'C` It
., 7.4(J1IATER) (�. /t d S 1 22 J2' N ?o�,y10 W. YO Y
o Tws SERVER Is A m°unON a 0R0wN T5 O \. 21.04' 11���� * 6
,Ecnml v1Ds onxE NEw you sign PALE BRN. O 'n --
:Duc AnON IAw. COARSE COARSE V 20. \ '•'
,TIES OF THIP SELDRY MAP NOT REAAl11G NAND GJAND ' _ - -•' G''
MF LAIRD SUIVEVO0.'S INKED SEAL O0. 1 B4O '� /3 1 ` _ .
13 n 20 40• 20.79'/ 808 Q e-
'Moos;m SIAL SHALE NOT IT CONS mEP30 \V/ O
lO RE A VALID TRUE Copy 22 52' NiAND Su 3
°o jLN\V
IUAA'LRS INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN
\ A N 4
Ir TO ixE PERSEN EOA wxom HE SERVO -1) ;L OO IANC SU1NE O
N
PXEPAAEU, AN0 GN HIS LEHALE TO THE 20.4 23'67 p O
111E COMPANY,GOVLXNMENiAL AGENCY ATOP / fi' p L" +. -, „ • „
EN01n1G IN91iU11ON LISTED LEXE°N. AND . �� 5
IOTIG
nsslcNLEs of RHE LENDING msnl / 23.56' DATE MAY 1, 198] . YOUNG B YOUNG
ON GUARANTEES ARE NOT TXANsfEM04 T SCALE , I " = ICO' pp pp
,.umnENA.wES ARE Ns oA suessauNn 400 OSTRANDER AVE.,RIVERHEAD, NY,� Q 1 �tl
�. �2 g �j NO. 85 -1482 ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S PE. 0 L.S. LIC. NO,•I? 45 x"1
- .T`+ 20.6 i 6' �� HOWARD W. YOUNG, RCS. L.S. LIC NO.45893
rill
N^ 11
,f1141a.r:l I'13H
' .- -1-�OF 2 51
LEGEND
n
'Q PAVED ROAD
1
a"_
o
o SPOT ELEVATION + 29. 38
A
Lot 40 1 Lot 39 ��m CONTOURS '---32--
Q w` 1459.86 ' -�Jm 4 WOODED AREA
R 1 N.84°38'�oIIE
25.39' MARSH
I , 24 07 • LoxD
YENNECOTT ? TRIB. AREA BOUNDARY -- xEex �1
i w m1 p l
I No. 5187 41 • 6
30,
Suff. Co. File .� za de/ N YIHNEL°TT Y'1
SubdivIS6 pYennecott Park° I LO 7 41 °_°" OF, E N �\Q, "
I 42 £ a a% o Y NNEGD T DR. €0 11
Lot 43 Lot I 27 22 (D R
Lot I Lot' 45 I Lot 44 25.6x ' P A j i'•'� ��
L 46
Park 81 Playground I 1123.63' I \
- �� `•I i9 B9^ ' '1• %AN�
c. 9f2�' > a 4 A S
� N,8 42 00' E .-� \ c N r. - I
21.00
16.159' _ . 1 t4 �_ : 25.9Y • : SB
/
17 43' -. �� I I-` �n S EA
23 2- '�zsi ^-21�� = -26' _ SEMENTIt
aN -+
2J os' U a
� \ \ � ,. �
1. `, \- \ Goo
-4-�--``
- ]J.SE' � N P
1/. YO ' ( 19.49 \ \ ' ` , _(�, `` \
S f o \ T 91000 + 20 `xz6` , 2s.21 P `
W 1J .6O'\ I 5'F:' , 90 of 16.1 I,L `p as `O,j` �24- -�� __ ` �• LILD X
Lot 47 O jq t0 AD \ \ I 1 .Je' 19 69' 23 O•�0O jN 16.39 r�-. .W LECTRIC TRANSMISSI - ._-
¢, W _ ml. F G 3''3000- E ` o '`\\ �` .yG 1 ON LINE
I } -� 33' 1
16 Sb 79' \ I I 1. .02 II 2 (2RILT CHAMBER a , ?20, P
° 3J.Jfi. \ •I • I 2 b oPIA.`x,?4Q4 '0
Y(. "
r = B. 0 �
W
''22 7 J .9d' : II I N11 O
1 02' 4N.'' i / + I 1 .9B' I I \ 'I 19.9�/'•/ GWF o oPQ 8G `'OO / f I �j1
IF q., �� Ib. 0' 23F/0 24AI Pj�.G(L.M.P np' 0' , \a �° < 9 V / O (n ', 'D
i' O. 43 `. x J
BI rW
0 ° '11X Nib - L''G Mx,X
i
now or formerly ` 32 \ __ o- Is 000 \ o
Richard H. Wheele a 16. 7 ' \ 20!96' �\ 0 3
I
Laur n E er ? fig \ ... ... Na O``- \'7 l\/�
ee Wheel y l 2
N 1 1�, O y SF ,1 ' , 16 73 19 '27' 'l� 1' \
q\ N 25 03' , -Dq x @5.59' J y D O _ ' <-ED / LOCATION MAP
E4 .gi• �iT �, '" S / SCALEI =600
29
/ J �?ROp01 :
A °1 .4p ' ` LINE OF WETLAND�J �� V y"6 27 e9 � , _ _ _ _ 9�_ / I\ • 1�' 1 I ' Av� I
XU). -ze G ONp
\ p
6 -7
a
28175 .. SU .OS ' 24 9 O / \
20.24' 16.79 18
19.65' ` I 1J JE' "36.53 / DOO / IP'
/ ..��... \\9h _S- 31 al . �.,3e t`�. `°':
O.__ A4. o +SIN/ •I '" S
\� - X0.46'\\ 90 x \ 000 //\\
17.69' 4E ! ,TEOT HOLE NO.1 •` \ 31 - \ S• o A �, \ I, ,Nx �, A 1(\ SITE DATA
16.90\ ./ ( SF. 97\ 1 24 1 37 11I \• Zqo � s 1 N. .m 1m'� ON O < -
NI'• 4 \! 00 6 S I. TOTAL AREA = 50.0171 ACRES
I 6.s9'� O P E N C-J P A G E J o4 166 .� \ u.! �\ i� N A (?9.99' \\ I L O 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT
�J• �: '•, 1 9 96 s 's m � /1' z = S DENTIA
N '`, - A- RE I L/AGRICULTURAL
�I, \ m r 17 „N N s 3. N0. OF LOTS = 20
i �\ I \1s I it 1 31 1� - ° �\ of X 1 0 Q 4. LENGTH OF ROAD = 1910 * FT.
\\ / 5. AREA OF OPEN SPACE = 27-ACRES
20.20'
23. 13" 42000 �.e o\ N 6. PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE = 54%
SIC 3d.56�_ 33. O ' s� \ ,�-,1 IBx D.4L.M.P&LOOD,%
lfi 92 F `, i 30.25' �\ 2 1 N
19.85' c m Ip 0 1520 - �.R „q REA, 16 "
_ c.e.NO9
W 2 IQ,! NI O.4 !I, TG= 27.81 AOT.T.6.=27.80
5.88°57150°W 572.831 s �] A39' •Gb N0.4 a (T z¢.31
2 �1' ' N 1 aiTA.0+28 `T`, /r A I.E.=23.88
3 100
1�. 1 ' Q21 00' '', , 6 ALT. 2T,31 / 9.(s \\ ,{, P o
19 79' q13 ]IC
,
:
_ 4 ° 17 16• -
Tv 'FlE J/1T HOLE/
NiO. l
/ :' II ,` .� `� IE = zael x R,q 43000 Lj.F.
\ P A' EG
03285O'0.16.
'¢ (11 27 I AN02
£ N0.2 0 - 0 0 000
O,' `\ 2 1 X nB LO.MP
\ 16.Se' N '-2.72 Y', 2T!A' 33' 0600_ ` 2'}':G O,GO �O.G00•/�- d ' GO OF IB
19. 17' . ./8 N� / •/ 20. Sfi' I. / 29S'/ ' � 6*5.F / pe _ 't------/fO•/. .o D.N019G
' 1 - \AO oA/�.e ` ,, 7 l gTi.N4+00 Sm TRI9.40 00T,00": 12
now Or former) Herbert R. Mandel 20.54 \ � � . ' ` ` , T.G,. E¢74 9 0G .JPO yyfi. AREA • hEs 2T „
Y - _ \, F!TEI OF IB'b.4GMP 27.B3 A 2A.42
11 n 00' ..-T 22\62' ,\p \ LE.= 21.07 /n �`/• NE, N
S^O 02b 10`, q� N N
28. 13 O' L P'b�_
24 /\ b
11 p 4.4 14
el'� ,/^Y` g0\ x• Y rv° P P R3 I •'E
\' x2 \
3'1 _ n \ nK
20 .65' 5
: 1 25.94 g
,,(/-
25.7900
/( [9.05 f1 2 0T u3+oO °IN WE v
" 'L TOa24.74
E20 2 ' .
24 13 All 24 67
23.39
J6' PbOjy r44' Uy`• 28,OF e"b6.O.M.P. \)
\AY1I II O \\ sA1 -�b\ e\y 3 Ad O0I• \ RR O..- 1. //
0''4 o 9� n'
a 4 ; ,1 A,b�� 1. 6 Y pb \ N PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP
TE�JT HOLE NO TELJT HOLE NO.2 O 26 59' ' I I, T q A,
,. 24.77' 24. 1 / / W
NOTE: ° '�• z H E�' PREPARED FOR
I SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP o.o
7 O A11A s. 11 ', 62 P'l' 92� `\` - 211 3__•'
DK.BROWN O.O 11 LA I !\b Xb 7' O
DIST, 1000 SECT.056 BL.OB LOT 03680!8 OK.DRO WN
DIST. 1000 SECT.086 BL 01 LOT 01 LOAM LOAM O 27 99' YII ,I F / A0 `1%�'2\�.'h O \,\ /2' 25.37
0.8 I' O , 1, ;.-O'L:! A;6' 3 OO , , 23.24 W FRANCIS 0 � MA
2. B.C.C.M.P INDICATES BITUMINOUS COATED CORRUGATED
DROWN tOIL � .,68 LLEY
61 LTY �JILTY W \E.
METAL PIPE. NANO SANG .c ,�, EAi d"� i _ •�!'Br G4 /y •21.ie 1,, 3.
2.4 2.2 GNP, ,Be 00 241. f2 'a - 4 0.d y\' \ \ ��•A ` 11, ____
\v/ 7S' i
23.3'• AT SOUTHOLD
3. PIPES CONNECTING LEACHING POOLS ARE 18" DIAMETER, RE0/ORawN REO/DROWN GR\g 00AI• X 25 a1' ',\ XD I I a' ,
60AR9f LOAR9E (2' , O \, 23. 13' ,
4. ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED /OANO
!ANO 00,6p0 �• p, 90 MLP -°O 23.25' ,
TO M,S.L.(N.G.V,D. -1929) 91 \ F7JLDNG ENVELOPE (TYP) TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
3.2 3.k P / ' :' ti1L e, �'( �" .K 24. 1J' _
DROWN/CRY. GREYIlOH M' ' . 0 TRI 1.69' S ,\ `. \ --,,/
CLAY DROWN 3 � pJ bO' i ,t p,5 NIV I\
`G
CLAY PFI° 21 as<' 22,; o- / SUFFOLK COUNTY, N Y S�PtE DFW FFy`
OJANPY 4.4(WATERI \3 \ }, 23.33'
pffi
LAY G CLAY
lD \ )t ` IO ' \` p
4.B LLAY 19 0: NO/ ', ' O\ o,•
WEE
DROWN A 20.9 D 2�.fi2' .. �
••�moxl<m nnExnNOn ax ADDIIIDA ,LOAR%E 'O Q ,1 /, 21.7,6'
q V °wm
OYXIs N.
s'. IsA VIOIAiION pF �'A'N� hCLA Y • ^ 7 \ O 23.0\3' P
aa:ory GEL Of ixF AMP ,0 20 35' N P.`_ ra4A `O`
ouc,,NOn:LAW NFW YOAM STATf T4(yyA,TERI fes. f' ,M a 22.72• ! 4'••``OPD
BROWN 75 O d V O
HoE IIIGF,11 THE su LOAR%E PALE 60.N, O ,T. .,b 21 .04' �\\ N Y<r,A By3
51{p f11AVFY0AVEY MAP NOT OR LOAR%E \ _ _ (+
A'S INKED SOL OR hANO 9 2O 4, A^ °DD
O'-qfD 5fµ""1 N0,CF CONEIDEAm OANO /) `( -w
WE .1 uD ICA 13.0 33. 1 ________ _. 7:5 40F04
(WIND50110
COPY, 130 O 20.40' 20.79' ` \ /21.FieI _p87 O
V:v THE
INDICATED XfAEOry SHALL AIM • \ / • E a O-
^nYIE: I rHE PEASON FOA WHOM i O V -n' 22.5'2' -
,,M,, AN' ON HIs AEHALF TO THE
GRV[I \ \y m
i° GiMPANY,
AGEN
GOVEANMFNIAL ry
,ONW L
` SiGp ESC ll5ipp HEREON,AND 23 97
A551GNETOf .L 20.4 ¢�O V'1
ME(ENDING INSiI{ 6 • 975
GWAgNTEES AAf NOi LRANSfE0.AYL[
NAE wvmuTIONA ox mAsfou.u, / 23.56'
DATE MAY
. I, 1987 YOUNG
8 YOUNGSCALEIloot
400 OSTRANOEfl
AV E.,RIV ERHEAD,
N.Y.
NO. 65 -1482 ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.YS, PE. 8 L S LIC. NO 12845
HOWARD W. YOUNG, NYS L S. LIC. NO.45893
19HEET I OF 2 50038
G6 N0. 9
PI =28.72 PI = 2756 PI =28.50
Lot I 900E 18�� 6GG.M.P 0 0.600% PI =2198 PI = 23. 18 SII - - - - V66 11
Vcc= + 0.08 Vcc= - O.OB 27.60
21.00 + 1.583�� -0.600% AOT= 2764 AOT= 28.42
GRIT CHAMOER _ AGT= 28.58 _ - - - + 0.600% -0.6 00
Lot 2 p + 0.600
4 + .800% / m
0.6 N0. 1
AGT.T.G.=2772 Q
I.E.= 24.22 w
P o
\ 1 I / K G. 0.1 NTC,
I.E.= 23.86 p.. AGT. T.G. =278 Q
11 II a�P HP .yI LF F
t \ / 230 OF 24� @GCM P 0 6-3413% 28. 61 2764 I- U z
1 1 ZO \
o N aD N Nm N'7 - w
N 0 - 00 O O cti e6 m 00 I'
01 N co = N N
Lot 3 N \n N
S
0 o O o o+ O O m )D O O
N O N O IOn m o
N i,vo -
1- 4) O N N + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + O+
+ + + + + + + + + +
O m 0) m N r I- \3 3 in V) in 't 't 't 0) to m (O N N N O O O
I \
/ Pf' OFILE f OAP "All
END hECTION II I 1 GAL E
I.E. - 16.00HORIZ 50,
I I I I VERT 1° = 10'
>L >L XL I ) I
11 I
i 1 1 I 1
�IL \
I 1
]1L yL 4- I I I I 11 Lot 4
I
• i 1\ 2764_
PI < 21.50 ,
I I \\ V66= +0.16
II II 11 \\
jACT- 21.66 + LOi°3%
_ T 0 27.
1.480% - -
T.G = 27.81
2-l5 OF 18 pLGM? C• O. 990•• I E = 24 3
495' OF 18 @ACNP 0 99o•/. Q
1 I I 1 135'AF IB 66 a.M.P C+ 0.3o0'/. GC. L10. $
SIC JI! I I I I TG = 2474 G6 N0.4 p
1 1 G. 6 N07ALT TO =2731 Q
1 I li w N 1 TO.=21. 82 IE.= 21.24 IE.= 2381 O
1 1 N i I E = 18. 32 06 N,O.6 OL
31( .W i �+ II I 1 T L.= 24 74
21.
i I G6. N0. 8 F'
I LE = 07
1
m I I I Lot 5 T. G= 21. 82 2
Z N II I. E. = 18. 15
r -
L S4
m LP
i ry III V 21. 65
LINE OF WETLAMOC9 I 0 d
Q 1 / 0- -
_ O N N
XL vA / I i / , o , °_� %i d Id ad ad ao
I / M = Gi _ N N N N N N N N N N
N N _ N N N
to
� 1
END CDECTION
I E. = 16.00O
/ O O O 0 O O O O O
O 0
F N O H O V) O N O N O N
]IL .vL /I i i 1 Lot 6 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
� I I ro n r 3 3 310 Y1 N N d' d m
P20F1 LE COAD
/ I I
I
\
HORIZ' I° _ 50
/ I \
VERT" 11 10,
I
Lot DfZAINAGE 621TEPIA
1, i II G 6. Mo. I f, 2
� ) I
)
V=ARO
A=TRIDUTARY AREA
R=
MJF
\ ��\ R= 2° RAINFALL = O 17
G = GOEFF. OF RUNOFF = 0.30 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP
M.H. °A" ` 20000 C.9.F F O. 17 + 0 ,30 = 1020 G F.
I.E = 16.81 I IOO�OF 18��0.G G.MP@0.810% 1020 6F. _ 4224 LF./FT. = 24. 1 FT PREPARED FOR
I UCDE (4)- 8'-0 DIA. c 61-0 DEEP L.P"h W/00N0. &.JLA5
FIRC9T L.P TO HAVE G. I. FRAME & COVER FRANCIS 0MALLEY
I
Lot 8
/ PONDING AREA
PK'AINAGE DETAIL V = ARG AT SOUTHOLD
�JGALE ° III = 501 A = TRIDUTARY AREA = 558000 'OF
R= 6° RAINFALL = 0.50 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
,I EXI�ITING CONTOUR -40-"" G= LOEFF OF RUNOFF = 0.25
2900E 18 O.GGMP@0.300% PROPOCOED CONTOUR X24-- SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y
558000 •'J.F • 0. 50 '� 0.25 = 70000 L.F.
TOTAL RERUI REP VOLUME = 70000 G.F.
Lot 9 TOTAL PROVIDED VOLUME = 720006.F
LATCH DAc9INf9
ALL LATCH DAhIMc9 TO LON&JIc9T OF
PRE6Ac9T 4K4 D0X WITH CONCRETE- (a LAD
& O. I. FRAME & GRATE.
- FLOGKHART FOUNDRY TYPE 683
CODE NO 60281 OR E4UAL
O140 OF1819)O.6M.P00300% 6
0
DATE' MAY I, 1987 YOUNG 8 YOUNG
o NO. 85 - 1482 400
� G 6. NOB �
3 RIVERHEAD, MY
v ALDEN SW. YOUNG, N.Y.S� PE. a L.S. LIC. NO. 12845
I,E.=1768 Pv HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. LIC. NO. 45893
6 � O
GRIT DHA, •°
-- (2-6_-o vu• 2'-c L.P.'S) G 6 N O.T
- I
LEGEND
- M PAVED ROAD
\
b0
SPOT ELEVATION + 29.38
Lot 39 o_m CONTOURS '---32--
Lot 40T
N WOODED AREA , �1
1 `459.86 w 1�`
N.84°38''�0'IE -- - w MARSH
25 39'
-q-
TRIB. AREA BOUNDARY `1
YEN
N
ECOTT
, N1
N
Co. Fill No. 5187 0 .� 25. 9 N N Cm m
I I" , Suff. E N N x
I Park °O- O P N °' p
"Yennecott I Lot 41 £ m
Subdivlson Lot 42 27 22' N, U)
Svc
N / /
I Lot 44 Lot 43 I 25.60 ' � P A G i;� �\ w a o- = ��
Lot' 45 I I ` , �l `r �`', m m A
Lot 46 I 1123.63 I � 29 63' Y'
Playground
SIT- , , PITA 21.00
park 21.°0 1\
IYB 42Dd'E �. XPj I ` • \ , fP 1 E. IZ50 I 27 19'
2597' '. '1,
,
y .` EAS k N
23 ' 2' ^_- •, 1 its 1121�_� _26--- �M�`Nr
17 ,43" / \~ ... �_�� t3 1� ,_ , , 27.05' m - °♦
21.0° '\ , , .' ���� f r _
ti1..0 9s Ate=.. A GOO v ,_ �. -- �'{_ N
d" ' �- 1
25 2i '
\ 17.56' \ -
17 9p' «s9.4s' m a0 tyO '24- _ r-- Ln a .. --tom 0 ELECTRIC TRA
., I 1 a _ I 91000 _+ yF IIY so OF IH".Bac1.e ` Q,♦ •,0a'. __ __ ' yam_', W ��.. ISSION LINE i.
` \ ®
0. A,
- 16.3 y 0
W P
\ I, 23. O \ \ .33 0.
P A L
Lot 47 ryI [ 3�oao•*.5e �2
I La D1A•+2'BER e`
oS7ne 16.]6. O - \ Ot.'R ` 20
- - �7;93' 1 .98' I .. I 11/ 79 5 . 0` _. I P6 OA 1 `v0 / �(. ' / / - o
22 791 '/ Sby9E= 16 O'
23 OF�4Yig O.GM P, 2* �f0 /B 9Q 268/
1 02' N .uL I -` 3143•/. u`.v�' S \ ° S' \ DO
1 / =^F \Bv a0
1 116 41 _o i
' - "p IS 1 LOCATION MAP 1,
now or formerly \5 a2ti �/3�J T
N% �� yt0 / PRCpI�SE� SCALE'1" -600'
S6. ,Z' , 128 96 \ 25.03
Richard HI Wheeler 81 z� 69 '' � 19 `2]
LOUr - r 16.]3' -
een E. Wheeler 91 m S V
., (wll \ ' 16_62x / 16x+1- ,- /° \ 1 214
6. 12
O ( i�. LINE OF WETLANDS2�6�Q
"4 AS FLAOEED BY N.Y.S. DEC. 6 79 / - -- -
1 II LOCATED 6/1/89 \ e.oi '24 9 OD x�' r \9 �s 18 �I a '
I. •�..�., , 2 6 0 / 9 198' (' •, S
, 'ifi1fi3 r�-,(/a \ 4
- 19 65 17.75 - hy" O 31 01 -
/ • 3 4i0.48A000fayrye0 11 m SITE DATA
4 / 17.69, ,1'F.4F TEST HOLE NO 1 `, \ ,,• Zed ` A d)' �' % F, m < I. TOTAL AREA = 50.0171 ACRES -
000 0
E9• 37 F.' IIS
";•� - �pl{.1 1 .�� 2, ZONING USE DISTRICT A- RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL
Y" It
4.96 mos B Nm I'I 26.99 '. ' Z 3. NO, QF.,LOTS = 20 '
P' � N ' �J CO PAC \ -� J � II , 11\,, "I 5 a v m f7 / `,� o 4. LENGTH OF ROAD = 1910:t FT.
o- 5. AREA OF OPEN SPACE = 27*ACRES
6. PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE = 54%
23 135 . '\25 i420�� �.F ,•\s • N '
I S' 600 13u8,GGAt.P@LooO%
20.20' \ � 1`\\`�\ ffi � � 3tl.56 ' 1 N '
�' Z �\` '� � 330 9 � 2 m '
\ 161 .N
_ TRLb._ l A PT u3+OG %TA.0196
62OLZ G7.F. ` ,.P OTA. 0.2
q Ac RSA
1 ✓ / �� < W �� 1 2 1(y/ N0.4 d �T.G=2M9� 4OTT 'zT. 0 NI _
31 A39' •G.D.N0,4 d LE.
S.88-57'50"W 572.83' I A ! , I OTA.O N P8 m- 9
�\ _ oi .60. \ , N 6 ACT.T.G . 27.31 u, RFq 43000
SE \31C N'O 17. 16' 'I '',` 1 ' >l 0 1j� -26--7-� �I NO 9 2H.SO TAR5A
19.79' . ----------- �\ /
VV 1 I
1 of � 2TO' N0.2 O ® GOO'.
PJT HOL �` ' Gg�3. / %0 lv
19. 45'. . 1 7"� O' 'i I _\ 31.0 a v 2]G SH00% O.Cy00%_/� GL,OF 16
18.90' SIG £ / O 2 .33' CG006 v, _________ I w N
e /T\j[ µpi07T2
95. `I .I ry/• 140' -ACAtOsE ,
20 . 16' aF1 K OD' 0(. 0 TRIG. A•L2 ¢A.,¢2
19. 17' /8 .1 L, 7 ( P0TA.9+00 \ ¢=6'GF IH 54GMP AREA•2T.83
I . - - \' \ 4 T,G=24.T4 0 @ 996% -
20.5a' \ LE.= 21.07 \ f0 I'/ P ♦ N
1.1 ' ' 22\62'_ , TSP o�5. 10`.,. 1 26. 13' B�/ 4-H'-OI IA. xG' L.P'b��' N n, ra
m ' 'i
now or formerly Herbert R. Mandel - - e o _°O 1 , )/� ?
�? �'
Y-6 tt�
a9 §s°: T 1420 06' 021.y6' ea.a�"�\, ° Y, II UI'n
gy$ no _s - •.^`� i,a' }/� g�4 r� Y b m' \ �' 0o,
4- _ __ 1,1, .%S I N IR5.09' .- i o •w PIN
1« Yr .p I `'uJ.F. N (ER /V\ '
)4-26 _ q.4000 tAG yVP ,
° , \ , 1 c+s1, �0" \ 25.79 0 ���o• .'._, �� 6x1rrJ?I '
-
' TO N05
- / 4.05 h P1TA.3+00
-p�' `\\ O \``, 1 .20.23 �/ r 0 • TE.•PI4.P4 13 �`T.0\) 24 b7
24 E \ \\ \, O \ \ 1 3°j5 Q,vU 28 OF 18" 5.0.0 M,'@
23.38' \ \\11 O \ 'FN 7E :. U, 0 UU f @ O.GOO•/. - r
N . PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP
- •,1 II t5 " \�'Ao- B \K zb 24.77'\ 4
26,59':. t,l m 11` a ` �/ 0 °` / z3 g._..' N �' PREPARED FOR
E
TOJT, HOLE NO.1 TEOT HOLE NO.2 _
NOTE. s' 7 O \n ' s. I " �b�bm2 R \ ,�I ' x`.n 25.3]'
SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP O.O' O.o ' `I ss\ -` ' �° D°'AP ':9 0 j �` N. BAYBERRY ESTATES
OK,HROWN DK. DROWN p �^ 2J .69' ' \ 1` / N ♦ `\ . 23 29 m
DIST. 1000 SECT.055 BL.Rs- ''LOT 036 .036 LOAM LOAM O Q i(.�lp �' �'�-
DIST 1000 SECT.mss BL.RI-- LOT 01 0.8 1.1' 7 ,1 GH 1 01• \x 3.75' PROPOUJED 1Y1(ATER MAIM'
DROWN DROWN N� \ k '21.7m \SILTY P ]I-TY .\0G Ne 4.,.'SY 1 .,� \OG // , \ `' 23 3J' -- AT ' SOUTHOLD
2 METAL PPIPE INDICATES BITUMINOUS COATED CORRUGATED ' yANO gOANO t Cop,N.52'O 2_ 2a; 12 `a �Q4' '\ z R • I I s•, /`\\ �'' -
/y/ O \ //
REP/BROWN P.4' ftE7/DROWN 2.2 6Iz\&O \ 23. 13'
3. PIPES CONNECTING LEACHING POOLB ARE IB DIAMETER. COAROE COARSE cz zoo l• d ,��P 91 Op 21 25 ,\` \ - PJUILDIIJG ENVELOPE (TYP) _ / TOWN ' OF SOUTHOLD
4 ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED v�s.NP PJANO 0 0 20.' ti 3 RA % 24. 10'
TOM.S.L.(N.G.V.D. - 1929) 32 3.4! Nn P. o `V TR,3'O. 1.66• S -
, 1 23.33' SUFFOLK COUNTY N . Y
DROWNIGRY. GREYISH I,S�.A ,L,0,5 p1/ ,� ``, _
CLAY DROWN a0F I6 '
CLAY
4.4(WATER)
r
CLAY
PJANVY 4.8 GRY/DROWN !0 19. 0; O , lO 20.9 \V/ ` 4: 21.76:
I 'LAY 0 \ N - O 2 62' ( 0
C, D - _
cOANOV - .' O '' \ 0I e3 03• P h;hOPIt
� 20 35' \+ 22. 'LA-(WATER) LLAY S` -- 3 \° rwt suever 6 A VlourlON mr 7.5 O a. 21.L 4' \72 ' «R'T ` 'RR\�ME NW YOR®xn PALE SRN. O 4' O 0 ._ SS y1�R O' W' �Q COARSE V " 20. \ ��' �_W
oHFs os Iws sunver NAr Nor oFwlliN_ POAMP ) '. d /3. 1 / / "21 W r
m
.NH
UI,s A s TOR ^ 13.0 O 20.4D' 20.79'/ ,_ \ .fib' $Q$7 * O
mi0951N sEAt s"nLL NUl rF CU'4iOflF1 13.0 \V/
a ,¢ n YALID TAUT CO" 1 - 1^ 22 52' n E\\ T
00 M, S�- _
,u ANANTEb ,IM1IKARO HEREON SHALL XNn \ 'JP .L / " ,
nilY Ib rHf P"AoI` f0!WHOM TNI sY4Vi l / A 1 /' 23 67' Q yt'� • -
rxnnsso, ANP oN N0 mWHO T11 i - •L 20.a nL'O JUNE 13, 1989 NO 4589°'
dR! `UX ', GWERIIMPNIAI fVG[NCY IN ,. - / 6• - L,J'��� _- MAY 4' )BBT ✓
IU C.R+s"Tu HON IIII a 11s Arm s I 23.56' DATE MAY I, 1987 8`QrO UNH 59 "
Y mF es...r." oe tee WHIM Nslb _ / YOUNG 8 YOUNG
N., 11I.IErs nuo NUI TRnr+srellAt' l ' SCALE = I = 100' 400 OSTRANDER
UNG N SRR ER HE AD, N.Y.
N� . NO. B5 -1482 ALOEN_W:YOUNG, NYS. BE B L.B. LIC. N0. 12845
�2'g vO HOWARD W.YOUNG, N.YS. L.S. LIC. NO. 45893
20.6 6' , r
\Y
�.9 H'EET I OF 2 50038 . -
l
A
4
o
O
O 0 �7
Lot 39 0-0=
Lot 40
\459.86' -'' �^ �•
3
OR\\I� 11 N.84°38V
��- lON° OgEEN1`
` 24.07' -p_
`( ENNECOT
O 27.60'
No. 5187 -26 e9. •isl Poi
I A . 6Y99' E NECOTT DR, U p I
ILI guff. Co. Fil
Par
l I o to N
I "Yennecott Lot 41 £
I
Subdivision - I I Lot 42 I • `..25.60. 27 22' d ''�•' ,� 'e �/
Lot 44 Lot 43 '
now or formerly I Lot 45 I 3.63' I 2 ^�
Park I Lot 46 112 \ B.B3 N
Yennecott A9So. 2Oo'0 F% ; N
Prof arty owners n I`1 19L B9^ N nl
"Park & playground" 2p0°E. 27 16 z
�1 g 1 zs.9r 1 e
36 1•'' '1 ��] •`\2 `\ 1 I 1 'I ••�ILONG ENVELOPE 220 s� Nj
..1 S.
_i 1 1
16.159' - 1 23.', 2' •` . -�_�..]�-1��� 1� 4 of LILco >:L 9cTNlc -'_ 27.05' PPD
17.43' I A 15.29' 1 •� �*----_ YFSANZ I
1 M ti910 L
1 22.56'
1 `
4
N
1 .39 17 5 \ , \ 1 \ 25.2L
[/ -�
'I 37 40' ' 19.45' 17 56' �m 2O \ 2 _z 23.95'
W
\A 4 _________--
1 0 `N• `\ 3:100'.. -�
i 6
1.
17. 0' ' `' 2 '
.33 ' •� "Pp.
W i � is 19.]8' 16.69' 23.L 16.39
V' P
Lot 47 is m
' _ ``v 1 1 `
M SB.7B' � ^`2 `77' , , e
N
' //I r I I
It m 17 78' '/ D�G N I' Ae 11 . •. ` 1e.63' 21 .52' ', D
-- C) '•--- \ 7.93' i/ 1 9e• 26.10 ; AGI; PAM
••� � 19.94T• 1 I P
1 22:74'• . ' -
N'� 36.98' ✓1 .lis. O' .u� E.� I 215.70'
3 02' L A N D 5 p.fJ"r -q �T 3.�0' _ _._____ ___ 19.B6' o 'gyp
N
SCALE I 600
now 16 - - / I 1
`- 1 ` D LOCATION MAP
or formed \•,• 126.24';: S- ¢5 5
Rich y 16.7]' (e I 20.96'
Richard of 81 Z`.y ' 39.'2]OP \` 'e
Loureen E.Wheeler
64 0 16.41' 6.73' 9 1 p /
Wheeler e
W i '' / .6 17 .70'
\1 LINE OF WETLAND
0 .4 S 11 •'� /� ///((
f/ AS FLAG EDD 6/1/8. DEC. ve o1•` '2,q g 9{ �0 30 . \32dlld-��7 1iP•'
it I d LOCATED 6/I/B9 16.79' �• 26`1 - 2 1` '01
2L0.24t.,i 6.53 ...���.. .S '1 -3 dd i' eJ_F_ 45 31 1 ' psi
231751'.. -- S ,
19.65' ` 17 78
1 .7 1 -
.�• Q ``� J. 30 48,;
1 ` 1 1 34'
I 17.69' 2
4•,37"1' 6. '`
a
19.79' J. �'
9' 36.60' 20.99' '
17 X04' 29.96 q
��// 6. '• Q e Tlu
c `IS 1 11 \\\ I OI 31. 34. v r 3.100\% S�F. �taal
\ 4�oo3Co.r-
'23. l a 6 P O
Y 13' \25.35 0 •6 1M 0 I SITE DATA
1 x \ \\ 346';' • / 0 2UJ4 N• I. TOTAL AREA = 50.0171 AC
zo.zo• 16.46 'l11 s• 0a 1 '� 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT - 'R - 80 RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY 'A'
3. TOTAL LENGTH OF ROAD = 16001 L.F
19.es• CR \ I '39• i SD32oo 0: 5.F :. 4. TOTAL N0. OF LOTS = IB
` I ';' N ° 5 OPEN SPACE AREA = 33.9 i AC.
S.88°57'30°W. 572.83' Z S 1 zeo•
1 , '` 28.7
19.79' - sb
16
' 00 h
,, 3
1$0,
.
i DO P N
- Oy � )' 31.06-
0
19.45' 1 7 �' ' +0' 0 d
18.90' £ 36.58' rU = 2rl 2$.33' . NO o
20. 16' i' 1 0 V
r3 - ', ` a 1000 ± 3.r N d 117 \j 27 N r
20.94' 11' .00'..- ``v , . 13' 3 1 dGliO + aj Y
now or formerly Herbert R. Mandel ">i' s5'
fi. ` ` 24.05
20.06' 600 21.f76' ,• ,', . \ loo' D Q i r9e�'�// ••`. i
�9N9j A1d`�,4' 2e69• ' o
21' .85
1 23. 3 e m
20.66 r-- W79' 5 + AG R Eh
! -pY 1` -
L1 , _
. .3 _
z4. 1 - �O. ' 'll ` 1'0' , . , •�.as• ;. T" z 2• I(o , ; N II
CLUSTER ''
2 67 +
4 24.6 11 1•\ 20.12P 11, 35000 '_ �i.G �1 26:•33'
_
23.38' ---- ,N'" SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN
111 '1 1`'• L2o `\
'I (A, 60\ �.? s 2491' '�35OddS �J F. e �a�l
�a PREPARED FOR
{ 11 J� 21 `� N e
NOTEI - 25.37' , BAYBERRY ESTATES
'I '1 '��6. 71 5' s NN 1 b e4N ,II}
1 SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX NAP .^ 27.a9' �` ` 3 5 \ 200' 23 2q NW
DIST. 1000 SECTOSO SL.O9 LOT 03• •03• �•O Jpd ;f, " ;,� 2] 7fi' '`, 23 /� ` � _ ' AT SOUTHOLD
DIST. IoOa SECT 03s SL.O1 LOT 0I P P' �`; ,� •_L 12 �` AD / 23. ____
2 ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO M.S.L. / '�' 1 4J+ 24. 12 O TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
DATUM (N.G.V.D.- 1929). 1-PF 25.01' I 1 ', \ 33000 thF�- ] '\ '
23. 13'
484p0 /1.25' /// ` C i1 14
N /,�'/• ryi9a' 1 X21 6B' 0 ti00/ \ 1� 3'G 1�'QO '-/5.F /
�/ SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y
21.87
'-mom , V) .�A�,52300 iFG. �. \\\\����•••• \ / ,2 '.N o D
O � 3300f✓Y �J.� `
/ 23.09' / 4 OI\O o St'jE OF Ne is
�O 20.35. \\\/ 22.72' R 1^
4.
5UPVFr
IS 1, IOL 21 04 ' _______
OiXI5 '4+ •
.LOTION]]oG O! fHL NEW YO0.N Siprl Q -
c°rlEs OL IN'S WN", IMF Nar"A".D 7 23. 11' •� -" ,;e 1.69' - p$Q5 O
IN, LAND 10QVWONF weLD SIAL OF O 20.40' 20.79'
NA.'Sm 4N.SH"" NOr Y MILL PFO 22.32• PN ,
I° . AvSLM TELL COW 1 0�W S\- ` -
:UAIAMLES IWH,AWD NFEFON SHALL FEN N: -]• \ `' No 43899
7 4
>Mr ro TxL FNO om HOs dL'nOi ra LLHFRVF3 A' 23.B7 ' pQ �.
'6 vltevAMD, A •Pt, 20.4 S2 Tr.,sr,A A� . 4 f01�IND SUF'1ti�•0 �
NILE COIMANY.-W,,,1 11EHAL AGFNCY ANTI Cj.` O
pTNDINEE DEITITL110N LEmD NFFFOH. AND �' DATE OCT, 23, 1989 YOUNG 9 YO NG
.0 THE eeslcmu.1 IIA ISNDING INsn 1 23.56' SCALE I ' = 100' 400 OSTRANDER AVE.,RIVERHEAD, N.Y.
1 GUANANLHS ARE NOT PANSMAA9N0.
D ADE i..IIL INSTt"'N'N, no +��-1- d2 9 Ow\ 85 -1482 ALOEN W. YOUNG, NN.YS L S L L.S, LIC. N0. 12845
•
HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y9 L S LIC.N0.45893
50038