Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-63.-6-1 " p. y:..', \ \\ Ic(n . ) Mr. Edwards: No. Mr. Orlowski: Ms. Scopaz? Ms. Scopaz: No. Mr. Orlowski: O.K. Being no further comments or questions I will declare this hearing closed. *********************************** Mr. Orlowski: O.K. Next changes of zone. Griswald-TerrV-Glover- Board to make recommendation to the Town Board on this change of zone for the American Legion Hall. What is the pleasure of the Board? Mr. Ward: Mr. Chairman, with the discusions that we have had, I would like to move with the consensus is. Is that we recommend deniel of the change of zone based on the fact that the long range goals would not be served by such a change of zone. In that it is not the change of zone that will be in conformence with our proposed master plan. It would be a commercial zone that would intrude into a more natural zoning progression out from the center of our hamlet. Although the Griswold-Terry-Glover is an ongoing organization and does render a great service to the Town that we feel that the long range will best be served by not creating a change of zone at this time. So, I move that we recommend denial. Mr. Mullen: Second. Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and 'seconded. Any questions on the motion? All those in favor? Vote of the Board; Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward, Edwards. Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. Mr. Latham: It will be existing noncomforming as it is then? Mr. Ward: As it is now. Mr. Bruer: Can I ask the Board a question? Everybody is aware of the structure that exists there. Does anybody have any suggestions if it was stop being used as an American Legion Post what that building could be used for? In terms of your long anticipation of the future growth of that particular spot. You must have some thought on it. Mr. Mullen: I don't think it is our position to tell what is going to come in the future. Mr. Bruer: I know, but, you must have some category of what that building could be used for. It is a monstrosity other than being used as a Legion Post. Mr. Mullen: We will turn it over to a likable situation, thats all. Mr. Bruer: To a likable situation? It's not transferrable, I don't think. Mr. Mullen: VFW. 0<,;~ Mr. Bruer: I don't think we have/ji/ll;;;b~FW Mr. Mullen: Some other nonprofi~~ization. in town now. Mr. Bruer: To buy it and use it. Mr. Mullen: That's right. Mr. Bruer: Thank you very much. *********************************** Mr. Orlowski: Next we have Carr-Wanat change of zone _? application. Do you have some comments on this, Ms. Scopaz. Ms. Scopaz: Basically the applicant met with the Town Board at a Scoping session. I represented the Planning Board at this meeting. The Town Board has taken Lead,Agency status on the change of zone an~ has asked for a envpronmental impact statement to be p~pared. We have had some questions about the coordination with the Planning Board because the Planning Board has lead agency on the Norris Estates subdivision proposal. The applicant is proposing to use the Carr/Wanat change of zone as . alternative to placing the~ensity Norris property. What /' / was agreed to at the scoping session was that the Planning Boa~d ~~ would retai~.j~ lead agency status. In the draft environmental ~ impact stat~rwhen it is prepared, it has not been submitted to the Planning Board yet, the alternative section will include, amon~/~ther alternatives, a verY~detailed description of the Carr~nat property as an altern2tive. Basically the Town Board will wait for the Planning Board~ review of the draft environmental impact statement for the Norris property before proceeding with the change of zone application. That is basically what was agreed to. Mr. orlowSk~cte won't hold any determinations at this time. Ms. Scopaz: The question is, that one of the alternatives will include the CarE/Wanat property. That is basically the agreement ~ that was reac~here. I think the Board could convey to the applicant that it understands that and that that is the nature of the coordination between the two lead agencies. That you are going to do the review as a subdivision and make forward your comments to the Town Board after you have completed your review of the draft environmental impact statement. So you still have review over the subdivision prQGc~do~. P~~U~I Mr. Orlowski: O.K. Does the Board have any comment to make on this right now. < /' '-- < / ----- < ~ ~. Board: No. , Mr. Orlows~: No comment. L ~ -;7? 7~ ~r:::.TfD':" "". / LP-!:~ ~, )0 I.' , 11\"" . . .-',... , ',..""',..."'....' ',...., ..............i: ./ . .,21988 i~ !!~J 4330 Oakla~n Avenue Extension Southold, N. Y. 11971 516-765-2054 August 4, 1988 ,j lID' ~ @ ffi n ~t~l~\ l\Jll~ 5108R \II!} I' -' ," ! ~_._,. . 71..': i. ~:'v ':;,.>: ,,\' ') "" \, (-.. 'j ......"~............."'...... I \'~-'""",::".__.- "" UTHOLD TOWN .~ PlANNING 80ARe Frank Murphy, Supervisor To~n of Southold Main Road Southold, N. Y. 11971 Dear Frank, As I'm sure you are a~are, the Gris~old Terry Glover Post 803 American Legion voted at a business meeting in the spring of this year to pursue a change of zoning on our post home. A committee consisting of Russ Mann, Dick Diehl and Joseph Zimmer, was appointed to handle any and all correspondence concerning this issue. Their job ~as to also, coordinate ~ith the To~n Board. It opposed on any concur pursue has been brought to my attention that my name has been mentioned as being to this change in zoning. Please set the record straight, because my position matter concerning the Gris~old Terry Glover Post 803 American Legion, is to ~ith the ~ishes of the Post as a body. Therefore, since the Post voted to a change of zoning I SUPPORT THIS POSITION 100 PERCENT. I ~ould suggest that in the future any and all dialogue concerning this particular issue be negotiated through the above mentioned committee. As a member of Gris~old Terry Glover Post 803 American Legion, r kno~ that the membership can rely on your support concerning this issue. If you have any questions about any pending Veteran's issues, please contact me at the above address. I have been appointed as the Legislative Chairman for the Suffolk County American Legion. Yours~jn ~r' }'/! //'~ 0../ .~;: h/ - /"/{//'r' /" //b'" 'Z,c"{ L-f< o:0"/c?~ >Rob~rt F. Neville, Past Suffolk County Commander American Legion . Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 MEMORANDUM To: From: RE: Southold Town Board Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner Petition for change of zone by the Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 seTM #1000-63-6-1 April 13, 1988 Date: The proposed petition for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural to "B" Light Business should be denied for the following reasons: 1. The proposed zoning district is not compatible with the established residential character of the surrounding neighborhood. A. The two churches across the street are exceptions to the prevailing character of the neighborhood. However, they are uses that are allowed within the "A" Residential Agricultural District. B. The site is located on a dangerous curve; a known accident corner in Southold hamlet. Increasing the volume of traffic at this particular intersection is not recommended. 2. The proposed zoning district, if implemented, would encourage the spread of the business district outside of the existing hamlet business area. This precedent would encourage strip zoning, which works against protecting the vitality of the core business district. , . . '~"2.61218"1-9c 617.21 Appendix E State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance SEaR Project Number Date Feb 2 88 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing repulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental ConserVation Law. The Southold Town Board . as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Change-of-Zone for Griswold - Terry Post No. 803 SEQR Status: Type I 0 Unlisted 1XI Description of Action: To change the zoning of the above premises from.its present A Residential to BLight. Location: (Include street address and the name 01 the municipality/county. A location map of appropriate scale IS also recommended:1 See attached maps ----.- ----- .------.-- r ------'"~---~--------- SEOR Negative D~_.&ratlon "nsons Supporting This Determination: (See 617.6(g) lor requirements 01 ttlls determination; Ilee 617.6(h) forGondltloned Nel;1ative Oec'B' allon. See EAF Part II and II attached A change-af-zone for this parcel alone would Tesult in nc si(:rn:_t_i(:~-l; impact on the environment. However J as the Part III stateme~t reveals, the Town would put itself in ;:i positllm of vulnerabili.r-,' with respect to the remainder of the properties along Main Road- between Horton I s Lane and Ackerley Pond Road 2nd with respect t-_'..: other Fraternal Lodge Organizations with similJr pre-existina nonconforming uses. If the Town wishes to further consider this zoning change, it should cause a generic EIS adrlressing the above two situations to be prepared by the applicant. II Conditioned Negative Decleretlon, provide on attachment the specillc mitigation measures imposed. For Further Information: Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Address: Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, NY Telephone Number: 516-765-1801 For Type I Actions and Condltlonad Negative Declarations, a Copy 01 this Notice Sent to: Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Woll Road, Albany, New York 12233.0001 Appropriate Regional Office 01 the Department 01 Environmental Conservation-S tony Brook, N. Y . Office 0.1 the Chiel Executive Officer 01 the political subdivision In which the action will be principally located. Applicant (il any) I Other involved agencies (if any) 1- Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Planning Board Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq. for Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Department of Health Services "_"'''''.''_''_'''",">__,,''_''';_''c'~_~''''''~''.,''''>~"'.'''.;'_'~;""~"'-"'_'-''''''''''''''''''_' _.~,;;""...,_..,' " . . '~"'b-2 12,~?)-?c ,. 117 .21 Appendix A Slale Envlronmenlal Qualily Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEOR .' Purpo..: The full EM " deSigned to help appllcan" and agencies determine. in an orderly manner. whether a project or action may be SignIficant The question of whether an action may be Significant IS not always easy to answer. Frequent- Iv. there are aspects of a proJect that are subJectIVe or unmeasureable. It IS also understood that those who determine s.'gndteanc€> may have little or no formal knowledgE" of the environment or may be technICally expert in environmental analysiS In addition. mdny ......ho have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectIng the question Gf -signlhcance The full EM is tntended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly. comprehensIve tn nature, yet fleXible to allow introductIon of informatIon to f,t a proJect Dr actIon. full EAf Componenl.: The full EAF is comprised of three parts. Pari 1: PrOVIdes object.ve data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. ot assists a reviewer in the analy"s that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action It provides guidance as to whether an impact.s Iokely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact The form also identlhes whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. P.r1): If any impact In Part 2 is identlfi,.rl fll~ ~I:'te:"'lt:~~~.y.lcil"~. then f'art 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact IS actually important DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAr completed for this projeel: 5iI Part 1 12 Part 2 6lPart 3 Upon review 01 the onformatlon recorded on thIS EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supportong onformatlon. and conSIdering both the mag.tude and Importance of each impact. it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that o A The proleC! WIll II0t result in any large and important impactls) and. therefor.,. is one which will nol have a Slgnl1lca'"!t Impact on the environment. therefore.. neltlti\'e declu~lion will be "prep..red. o B Although the prolect could have a SIgnificant effect on the environment, there will not be a signifICant effect for thIS UnlISted Action because the mitigallon measures described in PART 3 have been requrred. there'ore . CONDITIONED nes'live decl..ation will be prep.red." ~. C Tht: prowrt ma, re!lult In one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on th" f'n\.'ltonmf'nt tht.'refort' a positi\'f' dtdu~tion ".i11 be pre-pare-d. . A (onrll:l(lnI'G 'Pgil~I\(- OPe IMallOn r'" only valid lor Unllqed Actions hange-of-Zone for Griswold - T .erry Post No. 803 '\,(1f"!h' 01 Action Southold Town Board '\,.11;,' ,,' 1",1,' '\~,'n( \ 1"1I11," \\:' -,.,' " ~ . .:,' 1)'1".'" I'.": \,',' __._" _ _ _ ..S.l.lP~; c;nr _. ~ _____ Zrlull '-Y"'L1;i:J'/\_ iJr'-{/ ~"l.:n.1liHl' 0' Prl'r..1~~ lit dlllt'H'nl1H'nl ff"..pnnqblt' olflcer) Francis J. Murphy - -- ------ -.. ~I..:n..ll'lr,. 01 H'''l "...dd. I J:~ II fr In I f'cHi -\~,'I,' \ D....l. 1 .1/ . ;/1 ! . i J .~" 0'.\ t . A.' _. 0., .,''"'' ) ,r,"':; {5c j ~~, w o o ." , I '" / J-' .; --I ~ ..., , , ,..__.~,_.,-;,,,,,,,,>~,,.,, :,-~';:"~*'~~":'~ . ~~(~':;::t~N;_" :r: .. ~'Y' . . --:.1'~-" -~ '~""'~i':,: ''"l' ',;",," ~","",' ""-'- i . 1 I ! , .', ~> ", ..-'-( 0:.) "', 'tt . ,(;',,>>; '-.", '" ,.;. , . ~-'.... , ," .:; ~rr ' ~ . ~~t~<~, -f':~(, .~<{J1' ,//'-" ~ - - -'" , ' . r#.,::ri j/ '., ,.i) . . s-r. P'\rr.?!(lL'" :::;(U:UH ///.. " ,.,"v" ,', , ~ '.l~ / , .... '. ,'" '/ .)'. ----", ;t- / ,p / ",>>'-, .\/ ,K<O,j //, }-1A<~N"'!'II.Er2'-"', AoV '/'",v/ ','(-,'\ /' " (.' ,(j' I ,,", y' 'p "':-'~"", ~"'f';;>;o'r"r'n-.::rI-':"--''''~/ ',IV ./l(.' ,<' ' ~":,'- .:.- ~~/ <9-i ~ '~.t ,- ~r& - ~- '-,- ::-~". _/ .!}<..'f" ,.;F .:.:-....~'.1. / ~'v, ~ l. ~ 'l-l'''''Al.U'IoJ'~'~\. 4"_ v <~;/:. I> '" ~ . / ,)'i. '. ~ ~' 3 I r /".. iJ.'-.""'. :yi,~ 1-.',-, ~-" I (,wi" "I I!. . '" ,r.. I rial, '-v/'v//''Y ~ /-i~' I' "~~ 1: '.' LJ-' . /" 'd' ,,,/ "'t\r,~.. U'J "_: J _""_.__ ,...,1 '::i:'/ '. ,,_....._~ v- \ 's' ~~.., ':-;~i;I"~" -; \"~'-. __tUC1lEG.r ~:~. '... L~'=ff ~ .,'StIJEi~""L~~ ,:/;': /I~~ -----1 ----,p 'i'"~l,, .... j()/ '-:"": /. /. /. 'll"' __IlU'jI-" , . ;,,:,L' . " ", ':!IU/~ I.l} '/' /'", ,\ n~ ,,;- . '.' ,''; , y' ~ 10; \ il! f"" . /l"I<f-M.5C>5, '," '-"". /-' / " 'I 1"IWlS""'!~} '~l1") l~ G .. I' /,', /,/ .,' " /.) _..1.-.--' ./'p'/""';"'j'~ ' r.J' J ..,~ 1 t;)v,IA;:;J't-J/.J//X ,.::.;--. v;l \ QU'I:.': /<1:/ .; -..", '. ---....!'!..,--.. --1-- ~nl ~~~I':j:).;. ..,.-1.'////.1 ~<"J l / \;... . . , . .. 01.::: !i',,' , 1:1 ' -:1' --< r.w . '-; . , / / />1~' .."-"T' " .l~lj"" , ';J II '\1.11 t;.J r ""/,' '~.J.J--.:-..I-~. \-~--. /1 .'s' i:i ~'~ 1'--'>-1\1i.--n ,j, :r3.' ..\ ""\"1:I'^~ \ ~.' rf.J~ C\':I-I~ r. 1 Ul I" "- 'l"~j""'" _ r.. ~ >3 ,~. '!fI ~ ! ~ ! m J, ~!L ~:. ~ r .fu~ / ~ . ~j ~_ \ r :_~__ . --~'-~.o:. '_; -.......!:"_ J.__-~- --....-. ~7~.;.....(~~_~__ ""'\ 'l--- . "'-~~~~~~---'-..i,~li:~~>"ji(; ~~. c:1b. \ 'O~ l""'o" ~~. ,K"..,~" -j) ,,~c \. --- , -, ' - ' ~ tt/ ' 1 ,.:----- I .pI' , ""C...-l!:,l-, .- ~,AN~ ---< ~ . " ;.-.... -. ~ ".I ..j-I \ I (_.: _ _____-- '. ~ '_, _ -- lC0N\4lJN-\' '!;'r-- ,%~! ". _--1---']>\ , r- .. ~..UoJ_ ,J; r~~~~-;1 -1\..--' ,.-- " \ '\- ': \ .,'It'4-& ".' -.:~\>r I... ~. ~. ., T.' , . . T C '\' '.--------' t t-u."-.t.~\{I;:, , \ ", V fT~;'lJ:(f. l t / I I 1 1 . .. i r--'" , I I .:;.:-' ..;;r. :;..\. ,I,~.~P ~. 1--'i' ..-J__ :~.:.lF.~~.t:~. ( - -; S.E-~"~;X:'~~"~-? .t,_: '_~~~-...- '~~::: ." , 'S,t~-':~"':~J"\,./ .I~YA .:~. . -....-.... "-:---,.-- "'-.--- ,. -..--_..-:- -- , ' -'t" 1- t:"", '. ">1" ('t. ,~;,: ..~' h~~~~~~79.~'_~2 :j00 -..( _ ,.., ,<' '-, -,.... '0 _~. I)'" -T'" ,~,,~, .~.....~ \;. :::-:.......v.!. ___'!'t_,:.:..I.:":,. ~.~ .'~;<,~_~~~;~.l~, :~;~)o t ~ '-1'1 ~~~'.l "'."'.-t.-':: ' ---[,_~~~, .:"1 ,~~r= _~:..':.' '~:~C:.r..~_;-~'J~. !.~ r; c:i"1f"; ....:n T/~'v ~~ DAT~. !' ""'.:". :.- -':_'_:~--_::_.._..-:.---~ .-,---.--'------.-..-. ~_. " t 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND ~"::'? V'M?Y--.''''-:: Responsibility of Ledd A~,e, ! I Gener.1 Inform.tion (Read Carefully) . In completing the form the revIewer should be guided by th~ CL'~S l,n IV' r ,\ f '> )~-' reasonablel The reviewer is not expected to be an expert env'rcrHT ':nr en. I~' t . Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) doe ml~ '"e i 1 or;l I~ Any large Impact must be evaluated In PART 3 to determine SlgnI1Ca.!:Cl' ll'rti\l~,l l' asks that it be looked at further :lnd determinations been , necessarily significant. ;lpact In column 2 simply posSIble the threshold of throughout the State and \olds may be appropnate . The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by shOWing types it l'nt::~1C:~ .ir:,~ ....i,Pit.. magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are gt~ne;,d If lh. (,,)\1 for most situations. But, for any specifIc project or site other 2'(arnpf!:,~ ,lnC/')[ \-;,';>f trrr <- for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part j . The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, wdl",'ar't Therefore, the eqmples are illustrative and have been offereo as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive li~t of Impaus and zhresj-,c!l!.Js to answer each question . The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question . In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlatllJe effecb. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be ~ny impac b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. Ii answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to Indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold is lower than example_ check column 1. d. Ii reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the Impact as potentlaliy large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change{sl in the prolect to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. ThIS must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project Site' I1JNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. . Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet . Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. . Construction on land where bedrock IS exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface . Construction that will contmue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage . ExcavatIon for minmg purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i e., rock or sod) per year .~ Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill . Construction in a deSignated flood~vay . Other Impacts 2 Will there be an effect t' __.IV u/:,que or unusual land forms found on the Site' (Ie, cliffs, dunes, geologIcal formations, etc.)lnNO DYES . SpecifiC land forms 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change I 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes oNo [] 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes DNo I I I I I 0 0 DYes DNa , i 0 0 DYes ONo I I 0 0 [., nNo ,--,Yes I 0 0 I DYes DNo I i 1 I 0 0 I DYes ONo I I "," ;_~,',,_~,,"'-'-"''''>;'-',''''''_'''''_'_' ...,_.,',_..,.,.,_;._.,_"........"",..w_,~"".-.h.-;,-";,,"'.-.,," . IMPACT ON WATER 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected' (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the EnVIronmental Conservation law, ECl) IliINO DVES Example. that would apply to column 2 . Developable area of Site contains a protected water body. . Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream . Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body . Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland . Other impacts: 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water' !9NO DVES Eumple. that would apply to column 2 . ^ 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water pr more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. . Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. . Other impacts 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity' LllNO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 . ProposEd Action will require a discharge permit. . Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. . Proposed Action requH~s water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumpmg capacity . Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. . Proposed ~ction will adverse\ affect groundwater . liqUid effluent will be conve",.,! off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity . Propo~ed Action ",,"ould use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day . Propo':>ed II ctlon will III..('J\ C:.U~,. 5iltation or other discharge mto an eXisting body of W~tt'f te. It i' f>x((".1 thilt there will b(' an ob\IOUS vIsual contrast or; nJ.tura: condItions . Propo':>ea Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons . Proposed ActIOn wrll allow residential Llses In areas 'without water and,lor sewer services . Propnsed Action locate'_ LonlmPf( 1.::1 and/or Industflal u<"ps \,...hlch mav requirE' nE'\'" or pxpan"IOIl nl {-\I\!Hlg V\,(l)tf' trf'iltmpnt and or sloragf' f a( d I'I(~'S . Other Impacts 6 Will nropoSE'd act.on alter drainage ':l'" or patterns. or <.urfacE' "'dlP1 runoffl ZiNO :!YlS EXrl -,ples tr.at would app:y to colun:'" .! . Pr( ~,r,:)C"d Action "",'ould c.han~l' f:ood Wd:er ilows 7 . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa . 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNo - 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa D 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes 01'0 D D DVes ~, L-1 No D D eYes eNo D 0 DYes :JNo 0 D C'Ye<; ~f\;o . " : ...., i .. eYes eNo ~ . Proposed Action ma\~ cause substantIal erosion . Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns . Propo,ed Action will allow development in a deSIgnated t100dway . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7 Will propo,ed action affect air Quality? (jjNO DYES hample, that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. . Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refu,e per hour. . Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed Sibs. per hour or a heat ,ource prodUCing more than 10 million BTU', per hour. . Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to mdustrial use . Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development withm eXlstmg industrial areas. . Other impacts. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Propo,ed Action affect any threatened or endangered ,peCle,' [}JNO DYES hample, that would apply to column 2 . Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the Site, over or near Site or found on the site. . Remov;;' of any portion of a critical or ,ignlflcant wildlife habitat . Application of pestiCide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for aericultural purposes . Other impacts 9 \\'111 Proposed ActIon substanllally affect non-threatened or non.endangt'red spt'clcs1 0t\'O DYES h.ilmples that would applv to column 2 . Propos€'d Action would sub~tanllally Int€'rlere With any reSident or migrator\" II..h, sh('lltl~h or wildlife Spf'CIIo''' . Propo\pd Action requlff'<' lhf' rt'moval at more than 10 acre~ 01 rn;llur(' I.orf,q (O\{'r 1(}() YI'M~ at agt'J Of other localh Importanl \Pgct,lllon IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 1() \\111 ttlt' Pror()~l'd A(llOn "lid! agricultural land re~ourc('s' CYfS x"o Elclmpl('!l th,1t \\(juld Jpph, to (olumn ) . lhf' rr0p()~l'd ,H lion l'l.OlJirl <,f"\-I.r (IO~~ or Ilmll ~1((('~S 10 agrlcullural Idnd (IrHlud('~ (ropl.lnd h,l\tl('ld~ pastur(' \Int'\ard. orchard. elc ) 8 1 Small to Moderate Impact o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 'I r 2 Potenti~1 Large Impact n I...J o LJ [J o o o o o o o o o o o o it ,- 3 i' Can Impac\ Be I Mitigated By i I Project Change eYes DVes DYes DYe, DYe, DYe, DYes DYe, DYe, DYe, DYe, DYe, DYes DYe, DYe, ~~~) f'S o~o [JNo [JNo DNa DNa oNo oNO oNO ONO ONo ONo oNo oNo oNO oNO 'Ie []NO _,No . . Construction activity \vould excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land . The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or. If located in an Agricultutal District. more than 2.S acres of agricultural land . The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural lar~ management systems le.g . subsurface drain lines. outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) . Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources' ~NO DYES (If necessary. use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21. Appendix B) Example. that would apply to column 2 . Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural . Proposed land uses, or proJect components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetIC qualities of that resource. . Prolect components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of sceniC views known to be important to the area, . Other Impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic. pre- histOriC or paleontologICal importance' Il:iNO DYES Eumples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or sIte listed on the State or National Rt'gister of hIstoric places . Any Impact to an archaeologIcal site or fossil bed located within the' project sIte . Proposed ActIon will occur In an area designated as se.nsitive for archaeological slles on the ~YS Site Invpntory . Olh('r Impans IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 \\'111 Pror)Q~pd A<tlon ,lllt>C!-the.quolnllt\' or qualIty of e,Xistmg or tuture opC'n ~~MC€'~ or H'( rt'allOnal opportunities} hamples that "ouio "ppl\' to column 2 ~NO DYES . Thp pprmanenl tott.'clo'\ure of a tuture reot'dtional opportunity . A major reduction 01 Gn open span" Important to the community . Other Impact\ 9 . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large M itigatPd By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 DYes DNo o o DYes o o DYes o o DYes o o DYes o o DYes o o DYes o. o , .. '- I e) o o DYes o o DYes o o o o o o DYes DYes DYes ONo ONo DNo ONo ONo ONo ON" ONo ONO ONo DNo ONo IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? GINO DYES ham pies that would apply to column 2 . Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods . Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed act,on affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? IX) NO DYES hamples that would apply to column 2 . Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. . Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ~ransmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use . Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors. noise, or .vibratlon as a result of the Proposed Actionl 0NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facd,ty . Odors will occur routmely (more than one hour per day) . Proposed Action will produce operating nOIse exceedIng the local ambient noise levels for nOIse outside of structures . Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a nOIse screen. . Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Wdl Proposed ActIon affect public health and safetyl 0NO DYES hamples that WOuld apply to column 2 . Propospd Action may (aus!:' a risk of explOSion or release of hazardous substances (I e od, pestiCides. chemicals, radiation, etc] In the event of dccldent or upset conditions, or there may be a chrOniC low level dischargE' or emiSSIon . Proposed ActIon may result In the burial of "hazardous wasH"s" in any form (I e tOXIC. pOl"onou,>. highly reactive. radioactive. Irritating, Infertlous, ele ) . Storagt' faedlfle,> for ont' mtllloll or more gallon<. of IIQudled natural gas or other tlammablp liqUids . Propo,>ed anion mJ", rt'suJ! m the ('xcavatlon or other dl,>turbanc(' WithIn 2,000 feet of a ,>lte u'-.ed for the disposal of sol,d or hazardous waste . Ot!-\"r Impacts 10 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By i Project Change I ---=-...! 0 ,~ DYes I, L.J ,..__No 0 :..J Yes DNo 0 0 DYes DNa ~ o o o o o o o o [J o o D o D o o o o o o L_ r-~ " ~ e-J -...J DYes DYes DYes [JYes DYes Liles []Yes DYes r-' l.-.:Yes ONo UNo ONO DNa DNa r' L;NO ONo ONo Yes [JNO Yes !'\;e; Ye~ 'n Yes n ,~t'O " LJ~o . ,..<~..."...-,.~".."""~.~,,,,..,*,.",,,~,,,,_..,,,,...;.........,,_.~-._''''''''''';;.''''"'''''-"''''^ . . IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? DNO I2iIVES Eumples that would apply to column 2 o The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. . The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this proJect. - o Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. o Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. . Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. . Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) o Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. . Ploposed Action will create or eliminate employment. . Other impacts: . 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 lXl !XlVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 m lXlVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 0 0 DVes DNa 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? I2iINO DVES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large. even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions DIscuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2' 1 Btlefl~. describe the impact 2 Descnbe (If applicable) how the Impact. could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by proJect changers) 3 Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the questIon of importance, consider . Thf' probability of the impact occurtlng . The duration of the impact . Its Irreversibility, includmg permanently lost reSOUfces of value . \Vheth(>f the' Impact can Of will be controlled . The regIonal consequence of lne impact . Its potpntlal dIVf"f~enCe from local needs and goals . \Vhether known ObwctlOns to the prOject r('latl' to thiS Impact {Continue on attachments} 11 Part I II 1. Impact on Growth and Charater of Community or NeiqhborhooQ The Part II analysis shows little significant environmental impact of this singular zone change petition, however f a precedent would be set for zoning change petitions along the West side of Main Road and this type of precedent would require a GElS for the entire strip. A precedent would also be set for zone change requests on other sites improved with buildings used by fraternal organizations throughout the Town. This proposal is also in conflict with the proposed zoning map for the Tovm. It will lead to the deterioration of the only RO District in the Southold Hamlet. "._. .w'e"_' ,"".." .,_..~..,._._____~_,~,"..."^__..,,..," "'^~"-"'_"""""",""'~-~' .,. 'O,,~ ."."""....... .~.,.,""",...'""'.,,'''"'~o;",",,'''...,..~'''''"''"''.>,,;'''''<''''~''''''';'''''..,_'''1" ,.-".~,,~- ..'c ~;.~'?'.~'" '" ~ ... -.J .... :z " -' '" '" l< l u > ::J V '- l '} '" o '- .-1- r--- . / , I ~__~.I. , (' --- \' "- -,. '" ,J 7 c_ r- '--...i.. .' //.{ /\ / l " - , -:...~ , "1--'". ,. r7 ~_ _. "}rei' /"Ms. /; .J / , '" / .~ . I " i '" /"'-::7 / Goose . . ROBERT H. BERNTSSON ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1939 JAMES A. SCHONDEBARE TOWN A TIORNEY TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board ,~ James A. Schondebare, Town Attorneyorrl March 14, 1988 GRISWOLD-TERRY-GLOVER CHANGE OF ZONE I have been asked to review your resolution of February 22, 1988, concerning this change of zone. Your resolution states "If as an American Legion Post ceases revert back to residential zone." the current use of the property to exist, the parcel would It appears that you have conditioned a change on who owns the property. The courts have held that zone can not be for the benefit of one party, but on a comprehensive plan regardless of who now owns later own the parcel. of zone based a change of must be based or who will Please provide the Town Board with a new resolution. cc: Town Board JAS:cms .......,... "" ~. Plli~~~~G;B~l'I!,D 11~''';iJfjl' -q~ Tdw-~' Ql1;gou Dh~D uJ -~t ~-", #f1 s u 'F.:qfK2' g~ y "'IlJ. ....,-,,\~ ..:~-. , .~ . .. COpy fOR YOUR H1FORMATION REC'CNEO FE.a '231987 Southold. N. Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 South"l,! T ,,,,.~ Clerk February 23, 1988 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Southo1d Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 RE: .Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 . SCTM# 1000-63-6-1 Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 22, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board for the change of zone for the Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District on certain property located on the west side of Main (Route 25) Road, south side Tuckers Lane, Southold, subject to the following condition: r.rE the current use of the property as an American Legion post~as~ to exist the parcel would revert back to a residential zon~ If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. 3/7/8'6 5,=L t, ~ ~ , [) DoS c.~ lo.-ur of ~ 1; 2U ~ ~1.~3~ Very truly yours, -b.e71.l)~ Cr:. ,1_ /...f ';Jr y ~~,I...J' BEN. NETT ORLOWSKI, JR ( CHAIRMAN~, . . SOUTHOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD jt (1.- ~. ~ ~ J().N ~~ ~ S~'.. l . p D Southold. N. Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 April 13, 1988 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 RE: Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 SCTM i1000-63-6-1 Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, April 11, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board to deny the Change of zone for the American Legion Hall. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. jt Very truly yours, ~L~~.~ CHAIRMAN r , , jl ~ Southold, N,Y, 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 23, 1988 Mrs. Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 RE: Griswold-TerrY-Glover Post No. 803 SCTM# 1000-63-6~i Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, February 22, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board for the change of zone for the Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District on certain property located on the west side of Main (Route 25) Road, south side Tuckers Lane, Southold,subject to the following condition: If the current use of the property as an American Legion Post ceases to exist the parcel would revert back to a residential zone. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, b.e1vn.a.0 ~) A,. y. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR(jCHAIRMAN , . SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD . jt . . '--."~ j, JUDITH T. TERRY ro\\.'N CLERK REGISTRAR 01- VITAL STATISTICS Tow'a""'Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765.1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 20, 1988 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the petition of Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B" Light Business District on certain property located on the west side of Main (Route 25) Road, south side Tuckers Lane, Southold. Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in said petition and determine the area so affected by your recommendations, and transmit the same to me. Thank you. Very truly yours, JU~ Southold Town Clerk Attachments . . "",,:r,,:'v"=,,*, .,....- ~ . . JAIl: 1988 Soalt1,H "own Clerk ~J .:2-/ CASE NO: ......... .............. STATE CF NEW YORK PETITION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IN THE. MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FOR A Cl-LlNGE, MODIFICATION OR AMEND:\!ENT OF THE BUILDL.'IG ZONE ORDL"- ANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. , ............................................................................. TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. I, ..~':.~.~.!:R}.9.7.I!\!:D::gJR)(!':.r...~R!!.L!'!R...~0~ residing at ..!:l.'!J.~..!l-!?'!9.....~.2!!.tl;1.9..I.fi.....N..x.,.. (Insert name of petitioner) Suffoll, County, New York, the undersigned, am the owner of certain real property situated at Town of Southold Suffolk Co.NY d t' I 'I' b d d d d 'b d f]} . ..................................1........................... tin more par ICU 0.1 > oun e an escn e as 0 ows. BEGINNING at a stake set at the intersection of the southerly line of Tucker's Lane with the westerly line of Main Road, and running thence along said westerly line of Main Road, South 13 degrees 53 minutes West 196.75 feet to land of Thomas Stacy; running thence along said land of Thomas Stacy, North 71 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds West 210.00 feet; thence still along said land of Thomas Stacy, South 13 degrees 53 minutes West, 100.00 feet to land of Arthur B. Gordon; thence along said land of Arthur B. Gordon, North 71 degrees 13 minutes 50 seconds West, 142.72 feet to a strip of land reserved for a private road fifty feet in width; thence along said strip of land, North 22 degrees 15 minutes East, 315.01 feet to said southerly line of Tucker's Lane; thence along said southerly line of Tucker's Lane, South 67 degrees 45 minutes East, 308.90 feet to the point of BEGINNING. 2. r do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of South old to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, inclUding the Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: Change the zoning of the above premises from its present "A"-Residential/Agricultural zoning, with nonconforming use as a catering operation and place of public assembly, to "B"-Light BUSiness, under which zoning the present uses of this property are permitted. d . :'tj. '-----_._--"._--_.__._~-----_.- . . . 3. Such request is made for the following- reasons: The subject premises have been used continuously as a catering operation and place of public assembly since 1948, which uses pre-exist the zoning ordinance of the Town of Southold. The property' was granted nonconforming status in 1957 rather than the appropriate "S"designation. The currently proposed Master Plan for the Town of Southold places this property in an area assigned the designation: "RO"-Residential/Office, which will not rectify but merely perpetuate the nonconforming status of this property. The applicant desires to insure that the premises may forevermore retain its present use, without fear that future events may affect its nonconforming status. (L. S.) .......///....... . /.~/.. . .................... STATE OF NEW YORK,) ) SS:- COU:\TY OF SUFFOLK, ) ..... ~!'~.'!~l?P..~...jlF.u.~,...................... , BEI;{C DULY S\VORX, deposes and sa)'s th~t /attorney for . he is the petitioner in the within action; that he has read the foregoing Petition and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to his (her) OWn knowledge, except as to the matters the:-ein stated to be alleged on informatic:1. and Lc lief, and tb;J.t as to those matters he believes it to be true. (L. S.) /d; ..........Y.................... . . ...... Sworn to before me tf; this. ((.. day 01 ...... ,J.~~,:,!':rY........., 19.8.~. .~~~~ ...... .,.*.. .>:0;;;;- p;;;,;; it :" !!,:: 14-16-2 (2/87)-7c . . 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically e.xpert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3: Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may OCcur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE_ Type 1 and Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: 0 Part 1 Unlisted Actions Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magi tude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that. o A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. o B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment. there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' o C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. . A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions o Part 2 oPart 3 GRISWOLD - TERRY - GLOVER POST NO. 803 Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer In lead Agency Title of RpsponSlole Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in lead Agency Signature of Preparer(lf different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1-PROJECT INt-uRMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed mav have d significant effr~( on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E, Answers to the~e questions will be consldere a5 part of the application for approval and may be subject to further \i'~rification and public review. Provide any additioni:i information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and) It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on Information currently available and will not Iflvolvc new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, ';0 indicate and spec:if\ each instance. "----~--------- NAME OF ACTION Proposed change of Zone for Griswold-Terry-Glover Post No. 803 LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) (Noll) Main Road, Southold, New York, County of Suffoik - NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Edson & Bruer, Esqs. --- ADDRESS Main Road, P.O. Box 1466 ------ CITY/PO Southold ,- NAME OF OWNER (If different) Griswold - Terry - Glover, Post No 803 ----,---_.~_._-- ADDRESS (Noll) Main Road, Southold, ----..~---------_..._- CITY/PO Southold -~.--- DESCRIPT10N OF ACTION Proposed rezoning of this 80,000+ s .f. parcel from !I A" Residenti' "BI! - Li ht Bus ness g 1 Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project. 1 Present land use: DUrban DForest -: BUSINESS TELEPHONE L~~1165-1222 _.__ ----r STA-T.ETZIPCODE--~-': , , iN v : j'll'!'l Il..L. i _1.7, IBUSINESS TELEPHONE ~J.516 IJ0-=2'2'_6., '':;TAn:: --T ZIP CODE IU97i _-----.ll.:!.__.:________ _ll'1....y.. all Agrlcui_turaJ t both developed and undeveloped areas Dlndustrial OCommercial lZlResident!allsuburbal1! DAgriculture ImOther non-conforming business PRESE~nY .___~__..__,ICr('S o ,lcres -0- o 2. Total acreage of project area: 2+ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non.agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland. pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECl) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads. buildjngs and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) Landscaped _,__lI_,____ o approx. 3/T'-' -----_....~-_._- approx. lL_ 3. \Vhat IS predominant soil type(s) on projf'ct a Soil drainage: DWell drained site? information unavailable 1:::i\1odcr,ltt,)y we!1 drained 0;, {,f "It!' % of s.itc !JRural (non..tllrrn use \IHR COMPI Hl0~, uu,~u__. "crps (1 acres :!l.:rcs ,1er(", ;\UPS o )C;C' ,1Cl't'S ..___",iL_~ <lea's ;1(1"(", aup<; ,) c rt.'~ approx. '3 1+ <\Cll~('; derc.., Q:I2QI.Q~L___ ~lU(''-. CPoorly drained % of site b. If any agflculturdlland is Involved, how many acres of soli are classtiied wlthHl sod group 1 through 4 ',l: dlt' .,('{, land Classification Systeml acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4 Are there bedrock outcropplflgs on project sIte? DYes KNo a, What IS depth to bedrock' NI A (In feet) 2 ,. .. ,. "_.,..,,..,.~,,~_,,_,_"'",~ ."...;.,..,'0',. ",~-;,,'_",,".,'U""''''"~'' '.'~'",,.,,,",,_",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,""-'M' " .... 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Approximate percentage of proposed plct site with slopes: Information unavailable 00-10% 015% or greater .% 010-15% % Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Placesl DYes IJ<INo Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Naturallandmarksl DYes IJ<INo What is the depth of the water table? (in feet)Information unavailable Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole Source aquifer? DYes DNa Information unavailable Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? DYes I&JNo Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes DlNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) DYes I&JNo Describe % 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? DYes I&JNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes IJ<INo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Is the site served byexisting public utilities? IXIYes DNo a} If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant Section 303 and 3041 DYes IXINo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECl, and 6 NYCRR 617? DYes KINo 17. 18. DYes DYes DNo N/A DNo N/A to Agriculture and Markets law, Article 25-AA, 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes 1 DYes IKINo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: N/ A acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped N/ A acres. d. length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/ A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 100 ; proposed 100 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour N / A (upon completion of project)? h. If reSidential. Number and type of hOUSing units: N/ A One Family Two Family 2+ N/A acres. acres ultimately. %; Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (In feet) of largest proposed structure N/A height; i. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? Multiple Family Condominium width; 820.66 ft. length. 3 2. How much natural mOl-erial (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removt'Cl from the site? -IJ- t,r)fls/cublc ya.rde.; 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed' DYes DNo rnN/;\ a. If yes, for what intend~~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? ~----'~--'~~-----'-- b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation' DYes ["I No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation' DYe, 5ilNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? __-------=_0-___ 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by DYes [jgNo __.___ d(fPS. this prowct? 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction N/A months. (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: N/ A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month ~___ Yf~ar, (including demolition! c. Approximate completion date of final phase month ____. year d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases' DYes UNo 8. Will blasting occur during construction' DYes DNo N/ A 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction N/ A after project is complek 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project N/A 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? DYes I)QNo If yes. explain _____._._ ____~__..___~_.__________n.__ ..___......__ __ 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved' DYes [JNo N/ A a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, mdustrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged - --~----_.._--^.._-----_.__._~---------- ...___m___.___._ __ ______..___n...._______.___.______.._ 13 Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes IJ No N / A Type ___._____________ 14 \\'ill surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposail r:-iYes '_:>qNo '" J. Explain Is project or any portion of project located In a 100 year flood plain? L~~'{ es kJNo 16. Will the prolect generate solid waste' a. If yes, what is the amount per month b If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used' c. If yes, give name d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system e If Yes, explain [jYes ~No tons [JYes i'lNo location _____.__________,.._ _ ___.____~_ _~_.~m____ or mto a sanitary landfill? :Yf" i'\O 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste' a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated Site life' DYes [jgNo tons/month years 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides' i]Yes 5ilNo 19 \Vill project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)7 C\'es :-:>;No 20. \Vjll project produce operating noise exceeding the 10Cid ambient noise levels( DYes ~:j{jN() 21 \Vill project result in an increase in energy use? If yes. indicate type(s) UYes GaNo information 22 If water sllpply is from wells. Indicate pumping capaCIty l1n.<:lVR; li'lhlegdllonsrnllflute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/A gallons/day 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? If Yes, explain DYes l2lNo 4 ^.. .".",.........,.,...,."..""..o>.~"._.",._~.~,.,'~."..."'-..,,.".~",."'i--,,,,'.-":"';..4."'"."';"."'.~,..-,.,''''',.-''''"'.,. c. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? UlYes DNa If Yes, indicate decision required: IRIzoning amendment Dzoning variance Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision Dsite plan Onew/revision of master plan Oresource management plan Oother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? A-Residential/ Agricultural 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? N/A -Site to remain unchanged 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? B-Light Business 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A - Site to remain unchanged . . '25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department Other local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies . rnYes DNa DYes rnNo DYes UlNa DYes @No DYes rnNo DYes UlNo DYes @No DYes 0No . Submittal Date Type Change of Zone 1/ /88 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 7. What are the predominant land users) and zoning classifications within a Y. mile radius of proposed action? DYes DNa 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a y. mile? 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A 3. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(sJ for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes DNa 5 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? DYes rnNo DYes ~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes IKlNo 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DYes DNa a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes DNo. D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Edson & Bruer, Esqs. Title Attorney for Date Applicant 1/11 /88 E. Verification Signatur If the act/on i in th Coastal Area, and you are a state agency. complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment.